HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - City Council - 02/16/2021AGENDA
SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
IMPORTANT:
This will be a fully electronic meeting, consistent with recently-passed legislation. Presenters and members
of the public are invited to participate either by interactive online meeting or by telephone. There will be
no physical site at which to attend the meeting.
Participation Options:
Interactive Online Meeting (audio & video): https://www.gotomeet.me/SouthBurlingtonVT/city-
council-meeting02-16-2021
By Telephone (audio only): (312) 757-3121, Access Code: 197-254-709
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO PARTICIPATE BY THE INTERACTIVE ONLINE MEETING TOOL ARE ASKED TO MUTE YOUR MICROPHONES WHEN NOT SPEAKING AND TURN OFF YOUR CAMERAS. IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON A PARTICULAR AGENDA ITEM, TURN YOUR CAMERA ON TO BE RECOGNIZED AT THAT TIME.
Regular Session 6:30 P.M. Tuesday, February 16, 2021 1. Welcome (6:30 – 6:31 PM)*
2.Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items. (6:31 – 6:32 PM)
3.Comments and questions from the public not related to the agenda. (6:32 – 6:42 PM)
4.Announcements and City Manager’s Report. (6:42 – 6:52 PM)
5. Reports from Councilors on Committee assignments. (6:52 – 6:57 PM)
6.Consent Agenda: (6:57 – 7:00 PM)
A.*** Consider and Sign DisbursementsB.*** Approve grant application for VTrans 2021 Small-scale Bicycle and Pedestrian GrantsC.*** Approve Roadway Impact Fee In-Kind Credit request – 324 Garden Street / SP-20-30
D.*** Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Contract for Furniture for theSouth Burlington Public Library
7.*** Update and discussion on the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Interstate-89Corridor Study – Charlie Baker, Executive Director, CCRPC (7:00 – 7:30 PM)
8. Update on the status of the PUD/Natural Resources work of the Planning Commission – JessicaLouisos, Chair, Planning Commission, Paul Conner, Director of Planning and Zoning. (7:30 – 7:50PM)
9.Consider and possibly approve a one-year collective bargaining agreement with the Police OfficersAssociation - Andrew Bolduc, City Attorney (7:50 – 8:00 PM)
10.Conduct interviews and possibly appoint members to South Burlington Boards, Commissions andCommittees. (8:00 – 8:20 PM)
11.***January Financials - Tom Hubbard (8:20 – 8:25 PM)
12. Possible Executive Session to hear matters related to personnel and to receive advice from Legal Counsel and to discuss appointments to City of South Burlington Committees, Boards, and Commissions. (8:25 – 9:45 PM) 13. Discuss and possibly make appointments to City of South Burlington Committees, Boards and
Commissions. (9:45 – 9:50 PM) 14. Adjourn (9:50 PM) Respectfully Submitted:
Kevin Dorn Kevin Dorn, City Manager
* Times assigned to agenda items are approximations only
*** Attachments Included
South Burlington Water Dept.
Accounts Payable Check Register Date: 02/17/21
Date Check No. Paid To Memo Amount Paid 2/17/2021 4197 Champlain Water District 59,192.51
Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/31/2021 VI-15261 SBWD-370 59,192.51 59,192.51
2/17/2021 4198 Champlain Water District 130,363.10
Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/31/2021 VI-15262 SBWD-363 78.25 78.25 1/31/2021 VI-15263 JANUARY 130,284.85 130,284.85
2/17/2021 4199 E.J. Prescott, Inc. 51.67
Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/25/2021 VI-15264 5821644 51.67 51.67
2/17/2021 4200 Office Essentials 78.68
Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 2/5/2021 VI-15266 37646 78.68 78.68
2/17/2021 4201 City Of South Burlington 269,060.23
Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 2/1/2021 VI-15259 JANUARY SEWER 269,060.23 269,060.23
2/17/2021 4202 City Of South Burlington 220,137.59
Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 2/1/2021 VI-15260 JANUARY STORMWATER 220,137.59 220,137.59
2/17/2021 4203 Ti-Sales Inc. 9,000.00
Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 2/3/2021 VI-15265 INV0126902 9,000.00 9,000.00
Total Amount Paid: 687,883.78
SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
Printed: February 08, 2021 Page 1 of 1
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager; South Burlington City Council
FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning and Acting Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Roadway Impact Fee In-Kind Credit request – 324 Garden Street / SP-20-30
DATE: February 16, 2021 City Council meeting
Chris Snyder and Tim McKenzie recently submitted the attached request for issuance of a in-kind credit for
Roadway Impact Fees ascribed to the 43-unit residential building approved last fall at 324 Garden Street under
application #SP-20-30. They are seeking credit in the amount of $26,798.89. This figure represents the Roadway
Impact Fee that would otherwise be owed.
The City’s Impact Fee Ordinance authorizes the City Council to issue credit as follows:
Section 8. Credits for "In-Kind" Contributions.
A. "In-Kind" contribution shall mean provision, by a person subject to payment of an impact fee, of land or
equipment or construction of facilities that are included in the impact fee analyses and computations, and
which are included in or consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
B. Upon recommendation of the Development Review Board or Administrative Officer, the City Council may
approve a credit against any impact fee levied under this ordinance for the value of "In-Kind" contributions.
The amount of credit for an "In-Kind" contribution shall be based on the actual cost to the person requesting
the credit of providing or creating the facilities. The Development Review Board or Administrative Officer
shall indicate the basis on which the amount of credit is determined. The amount of credit for an "In-Kind"
contribution shall not exceed the total amount of the impact fee for that type of facility which would
otherwise be levied on the proposed development.
The applicants in this project are constructing a portion of Garden Street and have provided construction costs.
Garden Street is among the streets previously identifies to be a part of the “City Center Road Network”
enumerated in the Impact Fee Ordinance.
Recommendation
Upon review of the letter provided by Messrs. Snyder and McKenzie and the findings of SP-20-30, the
Administrative Officer find the request to be consistent with the Ordinance and recommends issuance of a credit
of $26,798.89. This recommendation applies only to the development approved by SP-20-30.
MEMO
TO:Paul Conner, AICPDirector of Planning & Zoning
FROM:Chris Snyder – Snyder-Braverman Development Company, LLCTim McKenzie – South Burlington City Center, LLC
DATE:February 2, 2021
RE:Proposed multi-family building - 324 Garden StreetCredit for in-kind contribution
Road Improvement Impact Fee
In accordance with Section 8 of the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, we are requestingyour recommendation to the City Council for approval of an in-kind contribution for theconstruction of the northerly segment of Garden Street, thereby eliminating the Road
Improvement Impact Fee for the building to be constructed at 324 Garden Street.
· Site Plan application #SP-20-030 for the construction of a 43 unit residential building tobe constructed at 324 Garden Street was approved by the Administrative Officer onNovember 2, 2020.
o Decision #16 states that the Administrative Office estimates that the building willgenerate twenty (20) vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour.
o A zoning permit application has yet to be submitted for construction of the 43 unit
residential building and related sitework.
· Site Plan application #SP-18-18 for the construction of a 60 unit residential buildingconstructed at 310 Market Street was approved by the Administrative Officer on August10, 2018.
o The findings note that Garden Street will be constructed in phases as approvedin decision #SD-18-23. The application must post a bond for the estimatedconstruction cost of the segment of Garden Street north of Market Street, plus a
15% contingency (excluding street trees). The estimated construction cost wasapproved by the Director of Public Works in an email dated June 25, 2018.
o Decision #4 states that prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant mustpost a bond for the construction of each phase of Garden Street (north segment)as indicated below:
§ Phase 1 $473,800
§ Phase 2 $387,550
§ Phase 3 $103,500
o Decision #13 states that the Administrative Officer estimates that the building willgenerate twenty seven (27) vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour.
o The request for an in-kind contribution was granted, thereby eliminating the RoadImprovement Impact Fee.
o A bond was posted for the construction of Garden Street (north segment) prior toobtaining the zoning permit
o Construction of Garden Street (north segment) is substantially complete,although all components of phase 2 are not yet finished. The sidewalk andpaved path along the frontage of Lot D will be constructed prior to the completionof building construction on Lot D.
· Preliminary and Final Plat application #SD-18-13 was approved by the DevelopmentReview Board on June 7, 2018. The application consisted of subdividing a parcel into 5lots, and adjusting a boundary line between a previously conveyed right of way and a
pre-existing sixth lot.
o Garden Street is a planned street as shown on the Official City Map
o Decision 16 outlined the approved phased construction of Garden Street, north of
Market Street.
o Decision 18 required that a bond be posted for the construction of Garden Street,in accordance with the phased construction, plus a 15% contingency.
The total credit for the in-kind contribution, as well as the previously approved and proposedRoad Improvement Impact Fee reductions are summarized below:
Total in-kind contribution credit
Garden Street (north segment)$ 964,850.00
Road Improvement Impact Fee Reductions
#SP-18-18 / 310 Market Street60 unit multi-family buildingImpact fee = $602.36 per MF unit ($ 36,141.60)
#SP-20-30 / 324 Garden Street
43 unit multi-family buildingImpact fee = $623.34 per MF unit ($ 26,798.89)
Unused in-kind contribution credit $ 901,909.51
We reserve the right to request approval to apply the unused in-kind contribution against RoadImprovement Impact Fees for future development in City Center.
South Burlington City Center, LLC. approves of the use of the impact fee credits for this project
(#SP-20-030 / 324 Garden Street).
With your recommendation, we look forward to reviewing this request with the City Council.
TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager
FROM: Ilona Blanchard, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Contract
for Furniture for the South Burlington Public Library
DATE: February 12, 2021
BACKGROUND:
In October, staff issued a competitive request for proposals for
provision of mainly public area furniture for the South
Burlington Public Library and City Hall.
95% of the existing furniture will move to the new building.
Furniture that will not move is located in City Hall, and has been
deemed unsuitable due to age and wear.
The furniture package (what was put out to bid) was designed by
Ratio Design in Colorado (formerly Humphries Poli Architects, a
part of the project design team) to fit the aesthetics and use of
each area within the building and their respective storage areas as
appropriate. Thought has been given to the weight of stacking
chairs where they are moved often and the ability for a single
staff person to fold up tables and move them around.
Pieces are contract level (cruise ship grade), intended to be
cleaned, sat on by a variety of weights, and withstand long use.
Fabrics are cleanable and have been tested for wear.
Proposal
Furniture proposals were competitively sought based on Ratio
Design (formerly Humphries Poli) specifications. The package
included shelving, which was allowed to be priced separately.
The shelving contract has already been awarded by the Council
to Exterus.
The City received 20 requests for the bid package. Five vendors
responded to the furniture portion of the request for proposals.
Ratio Design reviewed each proposal. Per the Specifications,
respondents were allowed to submit substitutions for specified
furniture subject to the review of the Ratio designer as equal.
Background, Continued, Page 2
Proposals received were as follows:
Vendor Price Substitutions Rejected
Red Thread 310,833.43 18 7
Exterus 331,766.10 32 6
Office Environments 263,660.51 108 34
WB Mason 371,156.50 high bid
Creative Office Pavilion 373,167.50 no bid on several items
Creative Office Pavilion did not bid on items, and was dis-
allowed. It was also the highest.
WB Mason, was deemed of the remaining responses, the highest
bidder.
Office Environments submitted a low bid price, but the vast
majority of the proposal was substituted items (82%) for the
furniture specified. 34 of the substitutions were rejected (26% of
the total). Substitutions are allowed so that vendors may provide
an equal product at a lower price. Given that the other two
bidders had many less rejected items (about 5%), and such a high
resubmit and reprice on items is similar to repricing a portion of
the project, and the pricing for the next highest bidder is
acceptable, the designer recommended Red Thread or Exterus.
Red Thread is recommended as the most responsive bidder.
This company has provided furniture for many other commercial
buildings in the area, with positive reviews.
Funding
Purchase of furniture for the project is included within the project
budget and funding identified.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract
with Red Thread Spaces, LLC for furniture for the South
Burlington Public Library.
ATTACHMENTS: • Request for Proposals
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment
Project: Furniture – South Burlington Public Library and City Hall
Deadline: Thursday, November 19, 2020, 2 PM
Proposals, subject to the Terms and Conditions of this REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL and other contract
provisions, will be received by the Community Development Director at City Hall, 575 Dorset Street,
South Burlington, VT, before the closing time and date shown above. Proposals must be provided via e-
mail, addressed to rburns@ratiodesign.com and cc:ed to: iblanchard@SouthBurlingtonVT.gov and
have “Sealed Proposals – FF&E 180 Market St” with the closing date and company name in the
subject line.
Proposals may be withdrawn at any time prior to the official opening. Proposals may not be altered,
amended, or withdrawn after the official opening without the recommendation and approval of the City
Manager. The undersigned agrees if the proposal/bid is accepted, to furnish any and all items upon which
prices are offered, at the price(s) and upon the terms and conditions contained in the bid documents. The
period for acceptance of this proposal shall be ninety calendar days.
BY SIGNING BELOW ON THIS COVER SHEET, YOU SIGNIFY THAT YOU HAVE READ
THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT AND AGREE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN IN
OFFERING YOUR BID AT THE PRICE BELOW.
Company Name Company’s Authorized Agent
Company Address Signature Date
Federal ID Number (TIN) Name and Title (Typed or Printed)
Telephone No. Email address:
Total Price for Furniture (from Bid Submittal
Worksheet – sum of extended prices)
Total Price for Shelving (from Bid Submittal
Worksheet – sum of extended prices)
Total Price for warehousing, delivery, and
installation - FURNITURE
Total Price for warehousing, delivery, and
installation - SHELVING
Grand Total (in numerals and written out):
2
Contents
1.INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 2
2.PROJECT ........................................................................................................................................ 3
2.1 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Special Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 4
4.BID SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS ........................................................................................................ 4
4.1 Submittal ................................................................................................................................... 4
4.2 Evaluation.................................................................................................................................. 5
4.3 Contents .................................................................................................................................... 6
4.4 Format ....................................................................................................................................... 7
5.SCHEDULE ......................................................................................................................................... 7
6.QUESTIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 7
7.ADDENDA .......................................................................................................................................... 7
8.GENERAL CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................... 7
8.01 Bids, Proposals, and Qualifications ........................................................................................... 7
8.02 Contract ..................................................................................................................................... 8
8.03 Non-Binding .............................................................................................................................. 8
8.04 Irregularities .............................................................................................................................. 9
8.05 Rejection of Proposal ................................................................................................................ 9
8.06 Failure to Execute the Agreement ............................................................................................ 9
8.07 Verification of Information ....................................................................................................... 9
9.ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 10
Attachment A: Furniture Plans ........................................................................................................... 11
Attachment B: Specifications .............................................................................................................. 12
Attachment C: BID Form and BID Submittal Worksheet .................................................................... 13
Attachment D: Vermont Debarment and Non-Collusion Affidavit ..................................................... 15
Attachment E: City Contract – Draft .................................................................................................. 18
1.INTRODUCTION
The City of South Burlington is requesting Proposals from interested and qualified Firms (Proposers) to
submit bids to provide Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment services for the South Burlington Public
Library and City Hall.
3
2.PROJECT
The South Burlington Library, City Hall and Senior Center are relocating to a new building at 180 Market
St in South Burlington, VT. The project will include new FF&E, shelving and installation for the City
Lobby, Auditorium, Senior Facilities, Public Library and Outdoor Spaces.
The project team includes the City of South Burlington (Owner), Ratio (interior design/FFE Coordination),
Weimann Lamphere Architects (Architect), and Engelberth Construction (Construction Manager).
2.1 Scope of Work
Scope to include the following:
1.Submittals
a.Submit brochure or actual samples for final product selection during the Design phase
along with a submittal schedule.
b.Submit Materials Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), as applicable.
c.Submit certification that, to the best of the manufacturers and contractor’s knowledge,
no asbestos containing materials have been incorporated into this project.
d.Provide purchase orders for review prior to completing orders.
2.Furniture Delivery and Installation
a.Provide all labor, material, equipment, and supervision to acquire, deliver, set up, and
install products as a turnkey system onsite as specified in accordance with contract
documents. This includes all cords, accessories, and hookups needed for fully functional
furniture and equipment.
b.Track the arrival of goods and provide weekly delivery updates to the Library.
c.Coordinate freight, warehousing with vendors and delivery and installation with the
Library, City, and the GC.
d.Schedule delivery of products according to Project timeline and provide schedule in
writing for review. Construction Manager (CM) will be onsite during delivery and
installation working on various areas of the project, which may include finishing up punch
list items in individual areas. Firm will need to coordinate deliveries, material lay downs,
and work areas with the CM daily.
e.Provide all debris containment, debris storage, and debris removal as well as provide a
clean site at the end of each working day as required by the City. Note that this is a LEED
project and recycling and composting is required as directed by the Designer and
Construction Manager.
f.Inspect all deliveries for shortages or damage and in conjunction with the City, and
document this on a punch list with photos and dates as necessary. Firm will take the lead
in reaching out to vendors to correct damaged goods in a timely fashion.
g.The FF&E firm is to keep corridors and access points free and clear of debris and furniture.
h.Coordinate Attic Stock delivery to location of choice decided by the City.
i.Provide proper protection for doors, frames, flooring etc… as part of the installation as
well as conduct a pre-install walk-through to document existing conditions.
j.Provide a punch list for all items that require attention, a punch-list walk through, and
address all punchlist and additional items that are identified as per the Bid Documents.
3.Closeout
a.Provide final clean, and any repairs to premise or furniture or replacements are required.
b.Submit one hard copy in a binder and one thumb drive as a single PDF with plans, final
furniture schedule, followed by each Warranty and Operation and Maintenance Manuals
4
for each item labeled and organized by item code. The O&M manual shall contain a
narrative on operation of any equipment, preventive maintenance including, cleaning,
adjustment, and lubrication schedules (if required). The manufacturer’s warranty shall
include any service agreements.
c.Conduct a final walkthrough, inspection, and acceptance of project.
2.2 Special Conditions
Special Conditions for this project are:
1.Each candidate is responsible for inspecting the site as well as making themselves familiar with
the new layout of the building, under which they shall be obliged to operate. Neglect of this
requirement will not be accepted as a cause for delay or adjustment in fee.
2.Withdrawal of Proposal - No proposal shall be withdrawn for a period of thirty (60) calendar days
after the Proposal deadline.
3.Successful candidate shall be responsible for obtaining and for the cost of all necessary permits
and coordinating all necessary inspections and approvals from governmental agencies having
jurisdiction over the project.
4.Safety – The successful candidate is responsible for administering and enforcing a project safety
program in accordance with local, state, and federal requirements and the requirements in place
by the Construction Manager/General Contractor
5.Security – The successful candidate is responsible for coordinating any required security with the
Construction Manager and City.
6.Parking – Candidate shall follow the parking plan put forth by the Construction Manager and City.
7.Debris – Successful candidate is responsible for disposal of all refuse generated by their work as
coordinated with the Construction Manager/General Contractor, and is responsible for prudent
protection.
8.Protection of Premises – Service provider is responsible for protection of all surfaces, including
exterior such as parking surfaces, landscaping and driving surfaces. Service provider is expected
to prudently protect such areas to prevent damage. Service provider shall be responsible for any
and all repairs to existing finishes in order to bring them back to pre-test conditions. Any damage
caused by the performance of the contractor’s work will be the contractor’s responsibility to
repair.
9.Schedule - It will be the responsibility of the selected service provider to coordinate with the
Construction Manager / General Contractor and the SBL representative to schedule services
based on the construction schedule. Services shall be conducted in a timely manner so as not to
delay the CM/GC’s schedule.
Refer to all Contract Documents for additional information and requirements, including Plans,
Specifications, Schedules, and the Contract.
4.BID SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
4.1 Submittal
Proposals shall be submitted to the City by the date and time shown on the cover .pdf. The City may
follow up with questions or interviews, or accept a proposal as provided. Respondents for this Project
shall submit a Proposal in accordance with the following instructions:
1.Provide all information requested by this RFP.
5
2.Provide information as it pertains to your firm. When referencing projects that were joint
ventures, indicate such and explain your firm’s role in the project.
3.The Proposal should be well organized and as concise and complete as possible while still
providing the requested information. Non-requested information and lengthy responses
are discouraged.
4.Information you believe is relevant to the selection of your firm for this Project but not
requested by the RFP may be submitted as an appendix to the Proposal.
5.Due to COVID-19, provide the Proposal in PDF format in an e-mail to
rburns@ratiodesign.com and cc:ed to iblanchard@SouthBurlingtonVT.gov with the subject
line “Sealed Bid – FF&E 180 Market St.” the date and your firm’s name by the date and time
prior to the time indicated on the cover. PDF submittals will not be opened until the due
date and time. If you do not receive confirmation of receipt, please e-mail or call. There will
be no formal opening.
All communications concerning the selection process and questions related to the RFP shall be directed
in writing to Ilona Blanchard, iblanchard@SouthBurlingtonVT.gov. In e-mail communications, place the
name of the Project in the subject line.
All proposals upon submission become the property of the City of South Burlington. The expense of
preparing and submitting a proposal is the sole responsibility of the submitter.
4.2 Evaluation
A proposal’s responsive to the overall needs of the City shall be evaluated on the basis of the following:
Price ....................................................... 60%
The following (as applicable) .................. 40%:
1.Bidder’s experience and reputation, including past performance for the City.
2.Quality of the materials and services specified in the bid.
3.Bidder’s ability to meet other terms and conditions, including insurance and bond requirements.
4.Bidder’s history of financial responsibility.
5.Bidder’s availability to provide future service, maintenance, and support.
6.Size of bidder with respect to the size of the job.
7.Ability to meet the timeline.
During evaluation, the City of South Burlington reserves the right to request additional information to
assist in the evaluation of the proposal.
The selection of a vendor shall be made without regard to race, color, sex, age, religion, familial status,
sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, physical or mental condition, HIV status, military
service, or political affiliation. The City of South Burlington is an Equal Opportunity Employer and
encourages proposals from qualified minority and woman owned businesses.
6
4.3 Contents
The Vendor is to make a proposal which presents an understanding of the work to be performed. The
proposal should demonstrate and provide evidence that the Vendor has the capabilities, professional
expertise, and experience to provide the necessary services as described in this RFP. The Vendor shall
ensure that all information required herein is submitted with the proposal. Failure to provide all
information, inaccuracy or misstatement may be sufficient cause for rejection of the proposal.
1.Cover Sheet
2.Cover Letter:
a.One (1) page maximum
b.Summarize your understanding of the projects and the value your firm could add
c.Describe what sets your firm apart from others
2. Description of Firm & Relevant Experience and Qualifications:
a.Number of years in business (note years in Vermont if applicable)
b.Location of office where team members will be based
d.List of basic and detailed services provided by firm
e.List the firm’s experience with public libraries, projects in Vermont and your
experience in working with public agencies
f.Discuss the firm’s knowledge of and experience with providing FF&E services in
Vermont.
g.Provide information on all claims and/or litigation your firm has been involved as a
party to the claim/lawsuit within the past five (5) years.
h.Provide references including current contact information for 3 to 5 clients for whom
you have provided similar services within the past two (2) years
3.Fee Proposal:
a.Fee shall be inclusive of all costs related to fulfilling the scope of services (Cover
Sheet).
b.Bid Submittal Worksheet with detailed item pricing for the Furniture Specification
Schedule. Ensure the contractor’s name is listed on the sheet.
i.Costs provided in the Bid Submittal Worksheet are to reflect net cost only
and not tax, freight, crating, etc.
c.Costs associated with freight, crating or any other fees are to be summed and shown
on the cover page as a separate cost in the Bid Submission Cover Page.
d.The City is tax exempt; and as per the language in the draft contract, the City is exempt
from taxes on goods and services be entirely consumed on products to be delivered
to or consumed in the delivery of the Work.
4.Schedule. Provide an anticipated schedule to deliver the Work.
5.Substitutions. Attach to the Bid Submission Worksheet documentation for any
substitutions organized in the order of the Bid Submission Worksheet proving equitable
quality and aesthetic of the substitution. See Bid Documents for other requirements. If fabric
substitutions are proposed, these shall be provided to the Designer, Owner and Architect.
6.Subcontractors.Provide a list of any subcontractors with a statement of qualification and
references, such as for installers or other agents.
7.Exceptions/Clarifications. Any exceptions or clarifications to the Bid Documents/draft
contract terms must be listed on an item-by-item basis. If there are no exceptions or
7
clarifications, the Bidder must expressly state that no exceptions are taken or clarifications
to be made.
8.Affidavit. Attach scan of completed debarment and non-collusion affidavit. Original to be
provided for final contract.
4.4 Format
Provide one digital copy of qualifications in a single PDF format. No other format will be opened. PDFs
shall be no larger than 19 MB. If the file size exceeds 19 MB, break into multiple files with one per e-
mail, with 1 of X in the subject line.
5.SCHEDULE
(dates subject to change)
Advertised Monday, October 30, 2020
Last day to submit questions COB Monday, November 9, 2020
Proposals due date and time 2 PM, Thursday, November 19, 2020
Contract Award Monday, December 7, 2020
Contract Signature and Kick-off meeting December 10, 2020
6.QUESTIONS
All questions regarding this RFP must be submitted in writing by e-mail to Ramona Burns at
rburns@ratiodesign.com and cc:ed to Ilona Blanchard at iblanchard@SouthBurlingtonVT.gov no later
than the last day indicated above.
7.ADDENDA
Addenda may be issued to supplement this RFP. All candidates requesting a copy of the RFP are
considered registered. The list of registered participants will be used to issue all communications
regarding this RFP, including formal addenda and date changes. It shall be conclusively presumed that
each candidate submitting a response has received all subsequent communications relating to the
project. Candidates will be responsible for all such information issued by this method.
8.GENERAL CONDITIONS
8.01 Bids, Proposals, and Qualifications
After opening, a respondent may not change any provision of a qualification, bid or proposal in a
manner prejudicial to the interests of the Owner or fair competition. Minor informalities may be waived
or the applicant may be allowed to correct them at the discretion of the City.
All bids, proposals, qualifications, including attachments, supplementary materials, sketches, etc. shall
become the property of the City and will not be returned to the candidate.
8
Bids are subject to the terms of the Vermont Access to Public Records Act (1 V.S.A. Chapter 5,
Subchapter 3) and all rules, regulations and interpretations resulting from, and any other applicable
rules, regulations or judicial decisions regarding access to the records of government. Only particular
sections or pages which are so marked and separated from the other pages and sections of the proposal
and accompanied by a convincing legal justification regarding the exemption from release of the
material consistent with Section 316 of Title 1 within a separate sealed envelope marked
“CONFIDENTIAL” will be considered for exemption at the sole discretion of the City.
The selection of a vendor shall be made without regard to race, color, sex, age, religion, familial status,
sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, physical or mental condition, HIV status, military
service, or political affiliation. The City of South Burlington is an Equal Opportunity Employer and
encourages proposals from qualified minority and woman owned businesses.
The City reserves the right to reject any or all responses to the RFP, to contract with the respondent(s)
best suited for the interests of the City of South Burlington, to reissue the RFP or to issue a follow-up
RFP.
8.02 Contract
The successful firm will be required to enter into a written contract (see attached) with the City in a
form acceptable to the City.
Exceptions to the Contract shall be specified at the time of the proposal submittal. A failure to specify
exceptions will be deemed an acceptance of the Contract’s terms and conditions. Should the City
choose to negotiate, the City may consider any such exceptions but shall not be bound by any such
exceptions.
All plans, schematic proposals, various design alternatives, specifications and other documents resulting
from this contract shall become the property of the City.
The City retains the right to approve all project team members and to require alternatives be proposed
for the team if an individual or sub is not approved.
The contractor shall adhere to the schedule as laid out in this request or modified by the contract, or in
writing by both parties.
Vendors shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations in the performance
of service. If the type of work is typically performed by someone whose profession must be licensed,
then the vendor must be licensed in the State of Vermont.
8.03 Non-Binding
This RFP and/or any interview process, shall in no way be deemed to create a binding contract or
agreement of any kind between the City and the Proposers.
This solicitation in no way obligates the City of South Burlington to contract with any qualified
respondent.
9
8.04 Irregularities
The City reserve the right to reject any or all responses, to cancel the Project, to alter the selection
process in any way, to postpone the selection process for its own convenience at any time, and to waive
any defects in a response.
8.05 Rejection of Proposal
The City may reject any or all proposals and may waive any immaterial deviation in a proposal. The City’s
waiver of an immaterial defect shall in no way modify the RFP documents or excuse the Proposer from
full compliance with the specifications if awarded the contract.
8.06 Failure to Execute the Agreement
Failure to execute the agreement within the timeframe identified in the Project Schedule shall be
sufficient cause for voiding the award. Failure to comply with other requirements within the set time
shall constitute failure to execute the agreement. If the selected Proposer refuses or fails to execute the
contract, the City may award the contract to the next qualified, highest-ranked Proposer.
8.07 Verification of Information
Bidders are hereby notified that the City will rely on the accuracy and completeness of all information
provided in making its selection. As such, Bidders are urged to carefully review all information provided
to ensure clarity, accuracy and completeness of such information. As the City deems necessary and
appropriate in its sole discretion, the City reserves the right to make any inquiries or other follow up
required to verify the information provided.
PACDW
3'-6"FaceOutDoubleSided
3'-6"FaceOutDoubleSided PAC5'-6"DoubleSided 5'-6"DoubleSided
5'-6"DoubleSided 5'-6"DoubleSided
AUDITORIUM114
CLERK
108 STOR.
110
VAULT
111
CLERK WORK
AREA
104
WORK RM
107
STAIR A
105
LOBBY
103
VESTIBULE
100
BOOK DROP
102
LIVING ROOM
147
LIBRARY LOBBY
142
ELEV B
CORRIDOR
122
A/V CL.
115
WOMENS RR
116
FAMILY RR
117 MENS RR
118
ELEC
119
MECH
120
VEST.
121
SENIOR ACTIVITY
RM
125
CATERING
KITCHEN
130
SENIOR STOR.
126
ACTIVITY RM
129
ACT. STOR.
128STORAGE
132
STAFF
137
STAFF
141
JAN.
140 STAFF RR
139
LIBRARY STOR.
136 IT
141A
STAIR B
131
STORYTIME
144
EARLY
LEARNING/LITERACY
145
STOR.
146
OFFICE
138
OFFICE
135
FAMILY RR
134
ELEV A
(3) NOOKS
CHILDREN'S
CARTS
OVERHEAD
SOFFIT
TWEEN AREA
LOBBY
103
INFO
113
AUD. STOR.
109
SENIOR LIVING
RM
123
CORRIDOR
122
D
C
B
A
YZ
1 1.2 2 2.4 3
M
L
K
J.4
J
H.6
H
G
F
E
8
7
6
4
CLERK DROP
101
ADULT'S
CARTS CATALOG CARTS142A
CH-103-02
EX-103-02
EX-103-01
CH-103-01
5
LS-103-01
EX-103-03
CH-103-01
EX-103-04
TB-114-02
CH-114-01
EX-114-01
CH-123-01
TB-123-01
LS-123-02
TB-123-02
LS-123-01
TB-123-03
LS-123-03
AC-123-01
ST-123-01
TB-123-02
CH-125-01
TB-125-01
LS-143-01
LS-143-02A
CHILDRENS
LIBRARY
143
CH-143-01
TB-143-01
CH-143-02
CH-129-01
TB-129-01
WS-143-01
EX-143-01
CH-143-04
TB-143-02
TB-143-03
LS-143-03
LS-143-04
CH-143-03
LS-143-05
CH-143-05
LS-143-06
LS-143-08
TB-143-04
LS-143-07
ST-143-01
EX-143-02
LS-147-01
TB-147-01
LS-147-02
ST-142-01
CH-147-01A
CH-142-01
CH-142-02
TB-142-01
ST-147-01
TB-104-01
LS-143-02B
LS-142-01 AC-143-01A
AC-143-01B
AC-143-01C
TB-114-01
CH-147-01B
NURSING
143
CH-143-04
TB-143-02
FURNITURE PLAN GENERAL NOTES
1. REFER TO SEPARATE FFE SCHEDULES FOR FURNITURE SPECIFICATIONS
2. ALL EXISTING FURNITURE TO BE REUSED IS LABELED AS "EX".
3. THIS PLAN IS PROVIDED FOR DESIGN AND INSTALLATION INTENT.
4. REFER TO SHELVING PLANS FOR SHELVING INFORMATION AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
N
525 Hercules Drive
Suite Two
Colchester, VT 05446
802.655.5020
802.622.6567
wiemannlamphere.com
SCALE:
DATE:
DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NO:
SHEET
TITLE:
SHEET
NUMBER:PRINTED:PLAN NORTH
FILENAME:All reports, plans, specifications,
computer files, field data, notes and
other documents and instruments
prepared by the Architect as
instruments of service shall remain
the property of the Architect. The
Architect shall retain all common
law, statutory and other reserved
rights, including copyright thereto.
FOR REFERENCE
ONLY
As indicated
10/27/2020 11:40:58AMC:\Revit\37030 - SBL_R19_shelf study_rburns80.rvtLIBRARY + SENIORCENTER + CITY HALLABAP
37030
LEVEL 1
FURNISHINGS
PLAN
A8.01
MARCH 20, 2019SOUTH BURLINGTON,VT180 MARKET ST100% CD SetA8.01 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 LEVEL 1 -FURNISHINGS PLAN
NO
.DATE:REVISION:
9.13.18 DD REV-1
3.6.19 100% CD Review Set
3.20.19 !00% CD
PACPAC5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTINGPAC5'-6"DoubleSided
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided
5'-6"DoubleSided 5'-6"DoubleSided
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSidedMobile-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSidedMobile-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSidedMobile-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided
5'-6"DoubleSidedMobile-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSidedMobile-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSidedMobile-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSidedMobile-EXISTING5'-6"Double
SidedMobile-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"Double
SidedMobile-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"
DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING 5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSidedMobile-EXISTING5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"Double
SidedMobile-EXISTING
5'-6"Double
SidedMobile-EXISTING
5'-6"Double
SidedMobile-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"Double
SidedMobile-EXISTING
5'-6"Double
SidedMobile-EXISTING
5'-6"Double
SidedMobile-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided-EXISTING
5'-6"DoubleSided
FURNITURE PLAN GENERAL NOTES
1. REFER TO SEPARATE FFE SCHEDULES FOR FURNITURE SPECIFICATIONS
2. ALL EXISTING FURNITURE TO BE REUSED IS LABELED AS "EX".
3. THIS PLAN IS PROVIDED FOR DESIGN AND INSTALLATION INTENT.
4. REFER TO SHELVING PLANS FOR SHELVING INFORMATION AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
D
C
B
A
YZ
1 1.2 2 2.4 3
M
L
K
J.4
J
H.6
H
G
F
E
8
7
6
4
5
ROOF
TERRACE
OPEN TO
BELOW
EXISTING
POD
SWING, ATTACHED
TO BEAM ABOVE
RAISED READING
AREA
207
STOR.
208
RR
209
RR
212
RR
210
RR
213 DIR. OFFICE
214
OFFICE
216
STOR.
217
STAFF
215
ELEC
219
MEETING
218
STAIR B
231
FRIENDS OF
LIBRARY
220
F.O.L. STOR.
221
STOR.
224
LIB. LARGE
MEETING RM
222
LIBRARY STACKS
200
EMR
200B
ELEV B
XXX
STUDY
225
STUDY
226
STUDY
227
QUIET READING
RM/BOOK GROUP
228
MEETING
201
EMR
200A
STORAGE
203
STAIR A
205
CORRIDOR
202
GALLERY WALL;
PICTURE RAIL
GALLERY WALL
A_OV-VT
A_NON
FICTION
A_NON
FICTION
A_FICTION
A_FICTION
A_FICTION
A_FICTION
A_FICTION
A_FICTION
OUTLINE OF
SKYLIGHT ABOVE
4' - 1 1/2"A_CD
A_DVD
?
A_NON
FICTION
A_BIOGRAPHY
A_AUDIO
BOOKS
DIGITAL LAB
204
RESERVATION /
PRINT RELEASE
STATION
ELEV A 4' - 1 1/4"PUZZLES &
COLORING
DISPLAY
A_YOUNG
ADULT
A_LIBRARY
OF
THINGS
TB-222-01
CH-222-01
EX-222-01
AC-200-01
EX-200-02
TB-200-01
TB-200-02
EX-200-01
EX-200-02
EX-200-01
LS-200-01
EX-200-02
EX-200-01
LS-200-03D
EX-200-01
TB-200-03
LS-200-02
EX-200-03
TB-200-03
LS-200-02A
TB-200-04EX-200-03
LS-200-02B
TB-200-03
EX-200-03
LS-200-02B
TB-200-03
CH-228-01
TB-228-03
LS-228-03
EX-200-05
AC-228-01
EX-200-06
TB-228-02
TB-228-01
LS-228-02
LS-228-01
LS-228-04
LS-200-03D
CH-200-01A
CH-200-02
WS-200-01
TB-200-05
CH-200-03
LS-200-04
CH-RT-02
LS-200-02C
TB-RT-02
CH-RT-01
ST-200-01
LS-RT-01
TB-RT-01
TB-200-03
CH-201-01
TB-201-01
WS-200-02
CH-200-01B
LS-200-03B
LS-200-03B
TB-200-02
EX-200-02
CH-204-01
EX-204-01
CH-207-01
EX-207-01
CH-207-02
LS-207-01
LS-207-02
TB-207-01
CH-207-02
LS-200-05
CH-218-01
TB-218-01
TB-200-06
CH-207-03
TB-200-03
EX-200-04
LS-214-01 CH-218-02
LS-200-03C
LS-200-03A
WS-200-01A
AC-200-02
ST-200-02
N
525 Hercules Drive
Suite Two
Colchester, VT 05446
802.655.5020
802.622.6567
wiemannlamphere.com
SCALE:
DATE:
DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NO:
SHEET
TITLE:
SHEET
NUMBER:PRINTED:PLAN NORTH
FILENAME:All reports, plans, specifications,
computer files, field data, notes and
other documents and instruments
prepared by the Architect as
instruments of service shall remain
the property of the Architect. The
Architect shall retain all common
law, statutory and other reserved
rights, including copyright thereto.
FOR REFERENCE
ONLY
As indicated
10/27/2020 11:41:24 AM C:\Revit\37030 - SBL_R19_shelf study_rburns80.rvtLIBRARY + SENIORCENTER + CITY HALLABAP
37030
LEVEL 2
FURNISHINGS
PLAN
A8.02
MARCH 20, 2019SOUTH BURLINGTON,VT180 MARKET ST100% CD SetNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNO
.DATE:REVISION:
9.13.18 DD REV-1
3.6.19 100% CD Review Set
3.20.19 !00% CD
A8.02 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 LEVEL 2 FURNISHINGS PLAN
DWROOF TERRACE
TOUCH
DOWN
COPY/WORK
AREA
1/2 WALL W/
DUTCH DOOR
STAIR A
305
ELEV A
343
STOR.
304A
STOR.
304B
LARGE MEETING
303
P&Z WAITING
301
MEETING
306
LUA
307
COAT CL.
302a
PLANNING &
ZONING
302
LMA
308
EXERCISE RM
314
LOCKERS
314ARR
315
FILE STOR.
310
WELLNESS
317
ELEC
318
STAIR B
331
BREAK RM
319
CITY
MANAGEMENT
321
SKYLIGHT TO
LIBRARY STAIR
BELOW
LMA
329 STOR.
328
LUA
325
EXEC. CONF.324
LMA
322
LMA
330
IT SERVER
332RR
312
RR
311
CITY WAITING
333
MEETING
334
STOR.
309
JAN. CL.
320
LVL 3 LOBBY
300
D
C
B
A
YZ
1 1.2 2 2.4 3
M
L
K
J.4
J
H.6
H
G
F
E
8
7
6
4
HR STOR.
323
(6)
COPY/MAIL
326
CORRIDOR
313
(6)
(7)
(14)
(6)
(4)
BLDG STOR.
327
COAT CL.
321A
TV-60MAILBOXES(4)
5
LS-319-02
CH-319-03
CH-319-04
TB-319-04
TB-319-05
CH-319-01
TB-319-01
CH-319-02
CH-319-01
TB-319-02
LS-319-01
EX-319-01
CH-319-01
LS-324-01
TB-324-01
LS-303-01
TB-303-02
CH-303-01
TB-303-01
NOT IN SCOPE
FURNITURE PLAN GENERAL NOTES
1. REFER TO SEPARATE FFE SCHEDULES FOR FURNITURE SPECIFICATIONS
2. ALL EXISTING FURNITURE TO BE REUSED IS LABELED AS "EX".
3. THIS PLAN IS PROVIDED FOR DESIGN AND INSTALLATION INTENT.
4. REFER TO SHELVING PLANS FOR SHELVING INFORMATION AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
N
525 Hercules Drive
Suite Two
Colchester, VT 05446
802.655.5020
802.622.6567
wiemannlamphere.com
SCALE:
DATE:
DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NO:
SHEET
TITLE:
SHEET
NUMBER:PRINTED:PLAN NORTH
FILENAME:All reports, plans, specifications,
computer files, field data, notes and
other documents and instruments
prepared by the Architect as
instruments of service shall remain
the property of the Architect. The
Architect shall retain all common
law, statutory and other reserved
rights, including copyright thereto.
FOR REFERENCE
ONLY
As indicated
10/27/2020 11:41:40 AM C:\Revit\37030 - SBL_R19_shelf study_rburns80.rvtLIBRARY + SENIORCENTER + CITY HALLABAP
37030
LEVEL 3
FURNISHINGS
PLAN
A8.03
MARCH 20, 2019SOUTH BURLINGTON,VT180 MARKET ST100% CD SetNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA8.03 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 LEVEL 3 FURNISHINGS PLAN
NO
.DATE:REVISION:
9.13.18 DD REV-1
3.6.19 100% CD Review Set
3.20.19 !00% CD
South Burlington City Council
February 16th, 2021
Presentation Overview
1.Project Background & Overview
2.Review Interchange Concept Plans
3.Review Interchange Evaluation
–seeking input on metrics and scoring
-leading to direction on Interchange Investments
4.Introduce beginning concepts for Bundles
–seeking initial input on the bundles
5.Next Steps
Project Background &
Overview
Demographic Forecasts
2015 2050 2015 to 2050
% increase
Population 161,382 183,172 14%
Employment 135,511 182,688 35%
Household 63,498 79,151 25%
CCRPC Board Approved, March 2017
▪70% of Funding goes to System Preservation
▪Concentrate growth in our Villages and Downtowns
–90% of HH growth in areas planned for growth
▪Safety (HCL) Improvements
▪ITS Investments
▪TDM Programs
▪Increases in walking/biking
▪Capacity expansion only when needed
2018 ECOS Plan Metropolitan
Transportation Plan Priorities
▪Transit enhancements
–15 minute headways on all trunk routes (US2, US7, VT15 & North Ave)
–20 –30 min headways on all other routes and improved weekend
service
–New Colchester loop
▪Identified Need for I-89 2050 Study (Exits 12 to 16)
–I-89 Third Lane between Exits 14 and 15?
–Interchange Improvements: Exit 12B (placeholder) or Exit 14
reconstruction or Exit 14N or Exit 13 or other?
MTP Priorities (Cont’d)
MTP Outcomes –meeting our transportation
/climate/energy goals
▪The significant MTP investment in bike/ped, transit, and park
& ride projects, if fully implemented, is estimated to have the
following impacts on regional travel through 2050:
❑2.4% decrease in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
❑4.6%decrease in Vehicle Hours of Travel (VHT)
❑Increase in Non-Automobile Mode-Share from about 12% to 16%
❑90% fleet electrification to meet the State's energy goal of having 90% of
Vermont's energy needs provided by renewable sources by 2050
❑77%Reduction in Fuel Consumption compared to 2015
Roadway Capacity
20152050 BaseMTP▪Balance possible I-89
widening vs. local road
improvements
▪Pursue alternative ways to
reduce congestion
o Transit, HOV lane, Connected
& Autonomous Vehicles
▪Increase funding share for
alternative modes
Project Study Area
37 miles & 7 interchanges,
arterials immediately adjacent to
the interchanges.
Process after this study
There are likely to be three kinds of recommendations coming out of this study.
Each will have a different implementation process. All projects must be included in
CCRPC’s MTP and TIP if federal funding is required.
▪Minor capital investments (shared-use paths, sidewalks, crosswalks, park and ride lots,
technology, signage, lane or ramp changes, etc.) –These will follow the normal capital
budgeting and implementation process of the responsible agency (VTrans or municipality).
▪Operational investments (transit services, transportation demand management programs,
etc.) –These will follow the normal operating budget process of the responsible agency
(VTrans, GMT, or municipality).
▪Major capital investments (Interchange or I-89 projects) –These will have to go through the
federally-required NEPA process and will require an Environmental Impact Study (EIS).
The timing of the different types of investments will be included in Task 6 –Implementation Plan
and include monitoring of conditions and triggers (what circumstances will trigger the need for
improvements).
Current I-89 Vision & Goals
The 2050 Vision for the I-89 Corridor through Chittenden County is an interstate system (mainline and
interchanges) that is safe, resilient, and provides for reliable and efficient movement of people and goods in
support of state, regional, and municipal plans and goals.
–Safety: Enhance safety along the I-89 Study Corridor and Adjacent interchanges for all users.
–Livable, Sustainable and Healthy Communities: Promote compact growth that supports livable,
affordable, vibrant, and healthy communities.
–Mobility & Efficiency: Improve the efficiency and reliability of the I-89 Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges
for all users.
–Environmental Stewardship & Resilience: Establish a resilient I-89 Corridor that minimizes environmental
impacts associated with the transportation system.
–Economic Access & Vitality: Improve economic access and vitality in Chittenden County.
–System Preservation: Preserve and improve the condition and performance of the I-89 Corridor
There is significant uncertainty about long-lasting changes on where people will live and how they will travel in the future due
to the COVID-19 pandemic, technology, demographics, and other dynamics. We recognize that the I-89 Vision, Goals,
Objectives and implementation actions that will follow will need to be monitored and reassessed periodically to ensure that they
address the evolving situation.
•Two Rounds of Interchange Evaluation
First Round of Interchanges
Evaluated
Second Round of
Interchanges Evaluated
❑Exit 12B –South Burlington
❑Exit 13 –South Burlington
❑Exit 14 –South Burlington
Based on results from the first round of interchange evaluation, the I-89
Advisory Committee voted to advance Exits 12B, 13, and 14 to the second
round of evaluation
Interchange Concept
Plans
2018 ECOS Plan
Future Land Uses
Second Round of Interchange Evaluation -Overview
Exit 14
1.Diverging Diamond Interchange2.Enhanced Cloverleaf
Exit 13
1.Hybrid (NB off-ramp, NB on-ramp, U-turn) + Bike Overpass
2.New Interchange: Single Point Urban Interchange
Exit 12B
1.New Interchange
2018 ECOS Plan
Future Land Uses
Second Round of Interchange Evaluation: Exit 12B
Exit 12B
1.New Interchange
DRAFT
2018 ECOS Plan
Future Land Uses
Interchange Evaluation: Exit 13
Exit 13
1.Hybrid + Bike Overpass
2.New Interchange: Single Point Urban Interchange
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
2018 ECOS Plan
Future Land Uses
Interchange Evaluation: Exit 14
Exit 14
1.Diverging Diamond Interchange
2.Enhanced Cloverleaf
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Interchange
Evaluation
Second Round Interchange Evaluation Metrics –1 of 2
SAFETY GOAL: Enhance safety along the I-89 Study Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users
•Ramp Spacing
•Safety Impact
•Bike/Ped Safety
LIVABLE, SUSTAINABLE, & HEALTHY COMMUNITIES GOAL: Promote compact growth that
supports livable, affordable, vibrant, and healthy communities.
•Consistent with Regional Plan
•ROW Impacts
•Environmental Justice / Underserved Populations
MOBILITY & EFFICIENCY GOAL:Improve the efficiency and reliability of the I-89 Corridor and
Adjacent Interchanges for all users.
•Interchange Trips
•VMT
•VHT
•I-89 Corridor V/C
•Average Delay
•Bike/Ped Connectivity
Second Round Interchange Evaluation Metrics –2 of 2
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP GOAL: Establish a resilient I-89 Corridor that minimizes
environmental impacts associated with the transportation system.
•Wetland Impacts
•River Corridors
•Natural Habitats
•Fuel Consumption
ECONOMIC ACCESS GOAL:Improve economic access and vitality in Chittenden County.
•Connectivity to Areas Planned for Growth
•Job Access
SYSTEM PRESERVATION GOAL: Preserve and improve the condition and performance of the
I-89 corridor.
•Asset Maintenance Cost
•Construction Cost
•Maintenance & Construction Cost
Draft Evaluation Scoring Process
▪Metrics were identified and evaluated for each goal. Many are specific
to the interchange evaluation stage. Others are more general and can
be used for evaluating bundles in the next stage.
▪Are there any metrics that should be changed or added at this
stage?
▪Scoring was applied to the metric results to highlight differences
between interchanges:
▪The results were scored with a range from 0-4 comparing the
lowest to the highest so that each result received points based
upon which quintile it fell in.
▪Should some of the metrics be scored on a different basis?
For example, compared to a base of 0, compared to 2015, or
compared to a no-build?
Second Round Interchange Evaluation Matrix
▪Two summary tables
–Raw metric values (left)
–Metric scores (right)
▪Organized by project goal
▪26 total scored metrics
–Rows in gray provided for
information only (not
scored)
▪Metric scores :
–(0 = low, 4 = high)
These matrices are attached
separately and on the
website.
Exit 12B
New Interchange Hybrid + Bike Overpass SPDI Enhanced Cloverleaf DDISAFETY: Enhance safety along the I-89 Study Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users
Ramp Spacing Meets AASHTO Standard for Ramp Spacing to Next Closest Interchange Yes / No N/A Yes Yes*Yes Yes Yes
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change in Total Crashes across the Network % Change in Total Estimated Crashes Compared to 2050 Base Scenario N/A -3.2%-1.3%0.4%-5.0%-2.8%
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change in Fatal and Injury Crashes across the Network % Change in Estimated Injury / Fatal Crashes Compared to 2050 Base Scenario N/A -1.1%-1.9%-3.1%-4.5%-2.3%
Bike/Ped Safety Safety Improvements for Bicyclists and Pedestrians based on Proposed Accommodations, Number of Conflicts Points, and Type of Conflict Point
Relative Level of Safety Improvement for Bicyclists and Pedestrians N/A Improved Significantly
Improved Improved Improved Improved
Safety / Operational Commentary
*Left Off-Ramp and Left On-Ramp Not Advised
Declassify I-189 from Interstate to Limited Access State Highway
C-D Road
Advised at Current/Future Volumes for Loop Ramps
Removes Merge on Mainline
LIVABLE, SUSTAINABLE, & HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: Promote compact growth that supports livable, affordable, vibrant, and healthy communities.
Total Secondary Growth Households 0 593 203 203 0 0
Proportion of 2020 to 2050 Household Growth Located in Growth Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth 90.24%90.40%90.33%90.33%90.24%90.24%
ROW Impacts Approximate area of ROW impacts based on limit of disturbance around the interchange Acres of ROW Disturbance N/A 4.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1
Additional Travel Time for Traffic Analysis Zones Identified as EJ communities Minutes of Additional Travel Time in 2050 N/A 0.019 0.022 0.011 0.018 0.023
Average Trip Length in the Model Average Trip Length in minutes 15.69 15.61 15.66 15.68 15.69 15.72
Additional Travel Time for EJ TAZs as a Percent of Average Trip Length % Additional Travel Time per Average Trip in 2050 N/A 0.12%0.14%0.07%0.12%0.15%
MOBILITY & EFFICIENCY: Improve the efficiency and reliability of the I-89 Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users.
Daily trips using new interchange in 2050 Total Trips Using New Interchange in 2050 N/A 24,321 56,198 57,334 49,677 46,924
# of Daily Trips Using Exit 14 51,929 47,226 46,654 45,319 49,677 46,924
Percent Change in # of Daily Trips Using Exit 14 N/A -9.1%-10.2%-12.7%-4.3%-9.6%
Total VMT 5,207,449 5,219,058 5,206,473 5,201,707 5,203,632 5,200,102
VMT per vehicle trip 8.103 8.087 8.097 8.090 8.097 8.092
% Change in VMT per vehicle trip in 2050 N/A -0.20%-0.07%-0.17%-0.07%-0.14%
Total VHT 147,758 147,394 147,452 147,636 147,737 147,906
% Change in VHT in 2050 N/A -0.25%-0.21%-0.08%-0.01%0.10%
I-89 Corridor V/C Mainline corridor congestion as indicated by the number of miles with v/c of greater than or equal to 0.9 Miles of Mainline with Severe Congestion 1.34 2.18 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34
Average Delay Change in 2050 PM Peak Hour Delay at Exit 14 Change in Average Delay per Trip (seconds) N/A -40 -34 -37 -47 -41
Bike/Ped Connectivity Bicyclist and Pedestrian Connectivity Improvements Across I-89 Based on Existing and Proposed Accomodations Level of Bike/Ped Connectivity Improvements N/A Improved Significantly Improved Significantly Improved Improved Improved
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: Establish a resilient I-89 Corridor that minimizes environmental impacts associated with the transportation system.
Acres of Impact to VSWI Wetlands N/A 0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0
Acres of Impact to 50 ft Wetland Buffers N/A 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.3 0
Acres of Impact to River Corridors N/A 0 1.1 1.8 0 0
Acres of Impact to 100-year Flood Zone N/A 0 1.1 0.5 0 0
Natural Habitats Approximate area of rare, threatened, and endangered (RTE) species impacts based on the estimated limits of disturbance for the interchange improvements Acres of RTE Impacts N/A 7 0 0 0 0
Resilience Percent Change Network Trip Robustness (NTR)Percent change in robustness N/A -0.38%0.81%0.93%-0.08%-0.14%
Total Gallons of Fuel Consumed per Day in 2050 40,744 40,835 40,736 40,699 40,714 40,686
% Change in Gallons of Fuel Consumed per Day in 2050 N/A 0.22%-0.02%-0.11%-0.07%-0.14%
ECONOMIC ACCESS: Improve economic access and vitality in Chittenden County.
Connectivity to Areas Planned for Growth
Percentage of land area within 1 mile of interchange that is classified as an ECOS Growth Zone (includes Center, Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Percentage of area within 1 mile of interchange in ECOS Growth Zone N/A 87%90%90%100%100%
Total number of projected new jobs in 2050 compared to 2020 within 1 radial mile of the interchange including adopted job projections and secondary growth
Total number of New Jobs within 1 Radial Mile of the Interchange N/A 3,054 2,461 2,461 4,133 4,133
Total number of projected 2050 jobs within 1 radial mile of the new interchange infrastructure including adopted job projections and secondary growth
Total Number of Jobs Within 1 Radial Mile of Interchange N/A 11,416 9,592 9,592 27,220 27,220
SYSTEM PRESERVATION: Preserve and improve the condition and performance of the I-89 corridor.
Asset Maintenance Cost Estimated 30-year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 & 14 combined
Asset Maintenance Cost (Bridges & Culverts) for Exits 12B, 13, & 14 combined (not including assets replaced with construction)$94,151,074 $88,516,699 $90,832,324 $48,464,064 $74,859,153 $84,840,338
Planning-Level Cost Estimate (millions of 2020 dollars) (Includes PE, CON, and contingency)$0 $29,000,000 $15,000,000 $61,000,000 $44,000,000 $37,000,000
Remaining MTP Allocation for Interstate and Interchange Projects (MTP Allocation - Cost Estimate) $74,300,000 $45,300,000 $59,300,000 $13,300,000 $30,300,000 $37,300,000
Total 2050 Cost (inclusive of asset maintenance and new construction costs)$94,151,074 $117,516,699 $105,832,324 $109,464,064 $118,859,153 $121,840,338
Incremental Additional Cost $0 $23,365,625 $11,681,250 $15,312,990 $24,708,079 $27,689,264
Interchange Trips
Number of daily trips using the Exit 14 Interchange
Construction Cost Estimated cost for the interchange improvements
Maintenance & Construction Cost
Estimated cost for the interchange improvements plus 30-year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 & 14 combined
Job Access
Fuel Consumption
Networkwide change in Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) per vehicle trip with interchange improvement and projected growth compared to the Future Base ModelVMT
Wetland Impacts Approximate area of wetland/wetland buffer impacts based on the estimated limits of disturbance for the interchange improvements
River Corridors Approximate area of river corridor, floodway, and 100-year flood zone impacts based on the estimated limits of disturbance for the interchange improvements
VHT
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 142050 Base Scenario
Safety Impact
Environmental Justice / Underserved Populations
Consistent with Regional Plan
Proportion of 2020 to 2050 Household Growth Located in Growth Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth (includes Center, Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Total Fuel Consumption Across Model Network (based on 2050 projection assuming MTP Investments and 90% electric vehicle fleet)
Networkwide change in Vehicle Hours of Travel (VHT) with interchange improvement and projected growth compared to the Future Base Model
Exit 12B
New Interchange Hybrid + Bike Overpass SPDI Enhanced Cloverleaf DDISAFETY: Enhance safety along the I-89 Study Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users
Ramp Spacing Meets AASHTO Standard for Ramp Spacing to Next Closest Interchange Yes / No 4 3 4 4 4
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change in Total Crashes across the Network % Change in Total Estimated Crashes Compared to 2050 Base Scenario 3 1 0 4 2
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change in Fatal and Injury Crashes across the Network % Change in Estimated Injury / Fatal Crashes Compared to 2050 Base Scenario 0 1 2 4 1
Bike/Ped Safety Safety Improvements for Bicyclists and Pedestrians based on Proposed Accommodations, Number of Conflicts Points, and Type of Conflict Point
Relative Level of Safety Improvement for Bicyclists and Pedestrians 2 4 3 2 2
Safety / Operational Commentary
*Left Off-Ramp and Left On-Ramp Not Advised
Declassify I-189 from Interstate to Limited Access State Highway
C-D Road
Advised at Current/Future Volumes for Loop Ramps
Removes Merge on Mainline
LIVABLE, SUSTAINABLE, & HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: Promote compact growth that supports livable, affordable, vibrant, and healthy communities.
Total Secondary Growth Households
Proportion of 2050 Households Located in Growth Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth 4 4 4 4 4
ROW Impacts Approximate area of ROW impacts based on limit of disturbance around the interchange Acres of ROW Disturbance 0 3 4 3 4
Additional Travel Time for Traffic Analysis Zones Identified as EJ communities Minutes of Additional Travel Time in 2050
Average Trip Length in the Model Average Trip Length in minutes
Additional Travel Time as a Percent of Average Trip Length % Additional Travel Time per Average Trip in 2050 2 2 2 2 2
MOBILITY & EFFICIENCY: Improve the efficiency and reliability of the I-89 Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users.
Daily trips using new interchange in 2050 Total Trips Using New Interchange in 2050
# of Daily Trips Using Exit 14
Percent Change in # of Daily Trips Using Exit 14 2 3 4 4 1
Total VMT
VMT per vehicle trip
% Change in VMT per vehicle trip in 2050 4 0 3 0 2
Total VHT
% Change in VHT in 2050 4 4 2 1 0
I-89 Corridor V/C Mainline corridor congestion as indicated by the number of miles with v/c of greater than or equal to 0.9 Miles of Mainline with Severe Congestion 0 4 4 4 4
Average Delay Change in 2050 PM Peak Hour Delay at Exit 14 Change in Average Delay per Trip (seconds) 2 0 1 4 2
Bike/Ped Connectivity Bicyclist and Pedestrian Connectivity Improvements Across I-89 Based on Existing and Proposed Accomodations Level of Bike/Ped Connectivity Improvements 2 4 4 2 2
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: Establish a resilient I-89 Corridor that minimizes environmental impacts associated with the transportation system.
Acres of Impact to VSWI Wetlands 4 0 4 4 4
Acres of Impact to 50 ft Wetland Buffers 4 0 2 3 4
Acres of Impact to River Corridors 4 1 0 4 4
Acres of Impact to 100-year Flood Zone 4 0 2 4 4
Natural Habitats Approximate area of rare, threatened, and endangered (RTE) species impacts based on the estimated limits of disturbance for the interchange improvements Acres of RTE Impacts 0 4 4 4 4
Resilience Percent Change Network Trip Robustness (NTR)Percent change in robustness 0 4 4 1 0
Total Gallons of Fuel Consumed per Day in 2050% Change in Gallons of Fuel Consumed per Day in 2050 0 3 4 4 4
ECONOMIC ACCESS: Improve economic access and vitality in Chittenden County.
Connectivity to Areas Planned for Growth
Percentage of land area within 1 mile of interchange that is classified as an ECOS Growth Zone (includes Center, Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Percentage of area within 1 mile of interchange in ECOS Growth Zone 0 1 1 4 4
Total number of projected new jobs in 2050 compared to 2020 within 1 radial mile of the interchange including adopted job projections and secondary growth
Total number of New Jobs within 1 Radial Mile of the Interchange 1 0 0 4 4
Total number of projected 2050 jobs within 1 radial mile of the new interchange infrastructure including adopted job projections and secondary growth
Total Number of Jobs Within 1 Radial Mile of Interchange 0 0 0 4 4
SYSTEM PRESERVATION: Preserve and improve the condition and performance of the I-89 corridor.
Asset Maintenance Cost Estimated 30-year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 & 14 combined
Asset Maintenance Cost (Bridges & Culverts) for Exits 12B, 13, & 14 combined (not including assets replaced with construction)0 0 4 1 0
Planning-Level Cost Estimate (millions of 2020 dollars) (Includes PE, CON, and contingency)3 4 0 1 2
Remaining MTP Allocation for Interstate and Interchange Projects (MTP Allocation - Cost Estimate)
Total 2050 Cost (inclusive of asset maintenance and new construction costs)1 4 3 0 0
Incremental Additional Cost
Estimated cost for the interchange improvements
Estimated cost for the interchange improvements plus 30-year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 & 14 combined
Interchange Trips
Number of daily trips using the Exit 14 Interchange
Construction Cost
Maintenance & Construction Cost
Job Access
VMT
Proportion of 2050 Households Located in ECOS Growth Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth (includes Center, Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 14
Safety Impact
Environmental Justice / Underserved Populations
Consistent with Regional Plan
Networkwide change in Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) per vehicle trip with interchange improvement and projected growth compared to the Future Base Model
Fuel Consumption Total Fuel Consumption Across Model Network (based on 2050 projection assuming MTP Investments and 90% electric vehicle fleet)
Wetland Impacts Approximate area of wetland/wetland buffer impacts based on the estimated limits of disturbance for the interchange improvements
River Corridors Approximate area of river corridor, floodway, and 100-year flood zone impacts based on the estimated limits of disturbance for the interchange improvements
VHT Networkwide change in Vehicle Hours of Travel (VHT) with interchange improvement and projected growth compared to the Future Base Model
Goal: Safety
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
SAFETY: Enhance safety along the I-89 Study Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users
Ramp Spacing Meets AASHTO Standard for Ramp Spacing to Next Closest
Interchange Yes / No N/A Yes Yes*Yes Yes Yes
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change
in Total Crashes across the Network
% Change in Total Estimated Crashes
Compared to 2050 Base Scenario N/A -3.2%-1.3%0.4%-5.0%-2.8%
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change
in Fatal and Injury Crashes across the Network
% Change in Estimated Injury / Fatal
Crashes Compared to 2050 Base Scenario N/A -1.1%-1.9%-3.1%-4.5%-2.3%
Bike/Ped Safety
Safety Improvements for Bicyclists and Pedestrians based
on Proposed Accommodations, Number of Conflicts Points,
and Type of Conflict Point
Relative Level of Safety Improvement for
Bicyclists and Pedestrians N/A Improved Significantly
Improved
Significantly
Improved Improved Improved
Safety / Operational
Commentary
*Left Off-Ramp
and Left On-
Ramp Not
Advised
Declassify I-189
from Interstate to
Limited Access
State Highway
C-D Road
Advised at
Current/Future
Volumes for Loop
Ramps
Removes Merge
on Mainline
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 142050 Base
Scenario
Safety Impact
Goal: Safety
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
SAFETY: Enhance safety along the I-89 Study Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users
Ramp Spacing Meets AASHTO Standard for Ramp Spacing to Next Closest
Interchange Yes / No 4 3 4 4 4
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change
in Total Crashes across the Network
% Change in Total Estimated Crashes
Compared to 2050 Base Scenario 3 1 0 4 2
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change
in Fatal and Injury Crashes across the Network
% Change in Estimated Injury / Fatal
Crashes Compared to 2050 Base Scenario 0 1 2 4 1
Bike/Ped Safety
Safety Improvements for Bicyclists and Pedestrians based
on Proposed Accommodations, Number of Conflicts Points,
and Type of Conflict Point
Relative Level of Safety Improvement for
Bicyclists and Pedestrians 2 4 4 2 2
Safety / Operational
Commentary
*Left Off-Ramp
and Left On-
Ramp Not
Advised
Declassify I-189
from Interstate to
Limited Access
State Highway
C-D Road
Advised at
Current/Future
Volumes for Loop
Ramps
Removes Merge
on Mainline
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 14
Safety Impact
Goal: Livable, Sustainable, & Healthy Communities
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
LIVABLE, SUSTAINABLE, & HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: Promote compact growth that supports livable, affordable, vibrant, and healthy communities.
Total Secondary Growth Households 0 593 203 203 0 0
Proportion of 2020 to 2050 Household
Growth Located in Growth Zones Inclusive of
Secondary Growth 90.24%90.40%90.33%90.33%90.24%90.24%
ROW Impacts Approximate area of ROW impacts based on limit of
disturbance around the interchange Acres of ROW Disturbance N/A 4.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1
Additional Travel Time for Traffic Analysis Zones Identified
as EJ communities Minutes of Additional Travel Time in 2050 N/A 0.019 0.022 0.011 0.018 0.023
Average Trip Length in the Model Average Trip Length in minutes 15.69 15.61 15.66 15.68 15.69 15.72
Additional Travel Time for EJ TAZs as a Percent of Average
Trip Length
% Additional Travel Time per Average Trip
in 2050 N/A 0.12%0.14%0.07%0.12%0.15%
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 142050 Base
Scenario
Environmental Justice /
Underserved Populations
Consistent with Regional
Plan
Proportion of 2020 to 2050 Household Growth Located in
Growth Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth (includes
Center, Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban
Designations)
Goal: Livable, Sustainable, & Healthy Communities
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
LIVABLE, SUSTAINABLE, & HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: Promote compact growth that supports livable, affordable, vibrant, and healthy communities.
Total Secondary Growth Households
Proportion of 2050 Households Located in
Growth Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth 4 4 4 4 4
ROW Impacts Approximate area of ROW impacts based on limit of
disturbance around the interchange Acres of ROW Disturbance 0 3 4 3 4
Additional Travel Time for Traffic Analysis Zones Identified
as EJ communities Minutes of Additional Travel Time in 2050
Average Trip Length in the Model Average Trip Length in minutes
Additional Travel Time as a Percent of Average Trip Length % Additional Travel Time per Average Trip
in 2050 2 2 2 2 2
Proportion of 2050 Households Located in ECOS Growth
Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth (includes Center,
Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 14
Environmental Justice /
Underserved Populations
Consistent with Regional
Plan
Goal: Mobility & Efficiency
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
MOBILITY & EFFICIENCY: Improve the efficiency and reliability of the I-89 Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users.
Daily trips using new interchange in 2050 Total Trips Using New Interchange in 2050 N/A 24,321 56,198 57,334 49,677 46,924
# of Daily Trips Using Exit 14 51,929 47,226 46,654 45,319 49,677 46,924
Percent Change in # of Daily Trips Using
Exit 14 N/A -9.1%-10.2%-12.7%-4.3%-9.6%
Total VMT 5,207,449 5,219,058 5,206,473 5,201,707 5,203,632 5,200,102
VMT per vehicle trip 8.103 8.087 8.097 8.090 8.097 8.092
% Change in VMT per vehicle trip in 2050 N/A -0.20%-0.07%-0.17%-0.07%-0.14%
Total VHT 147,758 147,394 147,452 147,636 147,737 147,906
% Change in VHT in 2050 N/A -0.25%-0.21%-0.08%-0.01%0.10%
I-89 Corridor V/C Mainline corridor congestion as indicated by the number of
miles with v/c of greater than or equal to 0.9 Miles of Mainline with v/c > 0.9 1.34 2.18 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34
Average Delay Change in 2050 PM Peak Hour Delay at Exit 14 Change in Average Delay per Trip (seconds) N/A -40 -34 -37 -47 -41
Bike/Ped Connectivity Bicyclist and Pedestrian Connectivity Improvements Across I-
89 Based on Existing and Proposed Accomodations Level of Bike/Ped Connectivity Improvements N/A Improved Significantly
Improved
Significantly
Improved Improved Improved
Interchange Trips
Number of daily trips using the Exit 14 Interchange
Networkwide change in Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) per
vehicle trip with interchange improvement and projected
growth compared to the Future Base Model
VMT
VHT
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 142050 Base
Scenario
Networkwide change in Vehicle Hours of Travel (VHT) with
interchange improvement and projected growth compared
to the Future Base Model
Goal: Mobility & Efficiency
MOBILITY & EFFICIENCY: Improve the efficiency and reliability of the I-89 Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users.
Daily trips using new interchange in 2050 Total Trips Using New Interchange in 2050
# of Daily Trips Using Exit 14
Percent Change in # of Daily Trips Using
Exit 14 2 3 4 0 3
Total VMT
Average Trip Length in miles
% Change in average trip length in 2050 4 0 3 0 2
Total VHT
% Change in VHT in 2050 4 4 2 1 0
I-89 Corridor V/C Mainline corridor congestion as indicated by the number of
miles with v/c of greater than or equal to 0.9 Miles of Mainline with v/c > 0.9 0 4 4 4 4
Average Delay Change in 2050 PM Peak Hour Delay at Exit 14 Change in Average Delay per Trip (seconds) 2 0 1 4 2
Bike/Ped Connectivity Bicyclist and Pedestrian Connectivity Improvements Across I-
89 Based on Existing and Proposed Accomodations Level of Bike/Ped Connectivity Improvements 2 4 4 2 2
Networkwide change in Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) per
vehicle trip with interchange improvement and projected
growth compared to the Future Base Model
VHT
Networkwide change in Vehicle Hours of Travel (VHT) with
interchange improvement and projected growth compared
to the Future Base Model
VMT
Interchange Trips
Number of daily trips using the Exit 14 Interchange
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 14
Goal: Environmental Stewardship
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: Establish a resilient I-89 Corridor that minimizes environmental impacts associated with the transportation system.
Acres of Impact to VSWI Wetlands N/A 0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0
Acres of Impact to 50 ft Wetland Buffers N/A 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.3 0
Acres of Impact to River Corridors N/A 0 1.1 1.8 0 0
Acres of Impact to 100-year Flood Zone N/A 0 1.1 0.5 0 0
Natural Habitats
Approximate area of rare, threatened, and endangered
(RTE) species impacts based on the estimated limits of
disturbance for the interchange improvements
Acres of RTE Impacts N/A 7 0 0 0 0
Resilience Percent Change Network Trip Robustness (NTR)Percent change in robustness N/A -0.38%0.81%0.93%-0.08%-0.14%
Total Gallons of Fuel Consumed per Day in
2050 40,744 40,835 40,736 40,699 40,714 40,686
% Change in Gallons of Fuel Consumed per
Day in 2050 N/A 0.22%-0.02%-0.11%-0.07%-0.14%Fuel Consumption
Wetland Impacts
Approximate area of wetland/wetland buffer impacts based
on the estimated limits of disturbance for the interchange
improvements
River Corridors
Approximate area of river corridor, floodway, and 100-year
flood zone impacts based on the estimated limits of
disturbance for the interchange improvements
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 142050 Base
Scenario
Total Fuel Consumption Across Model Network (based on
2050 projection assuming MTP Investments and 90%
electric vehicle fleet)
Goal: Environmental Stewardship
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: Establish a resilient I-89 Corridor that minimizes environmental impacts associated with the transportation system.
Acres of Impact to VSWI Wetlands 4 0 4 4 4
Acres of Impact to 50 ft Wetland Buffers 4 0 2 3 4
Acres of Impact to River Corridors 4 1 0 4 4
Acres of Impact to 100-year Flood Zone 4 0 2 4 4
Natural Habitats
Approximate area of rare, threatened, and endangered
(RTE) species impacts based on the estimated limits of
disturbance for the interchange improvements
Acres of RTE Impacts 0 4 4 4 4
Resilience Percent Change Network Trip Robustness (NTR)Percent change in robustness 0 4 4 1 0
Total Gallons of Fuel Consumed per Day in
2050
% Change in Gallons of Fuel Consumed per
Day in 2050 0 3 4 4 4
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 14
Fuel Consumption
Total Fuel Consumption Across Model Network (based on
2050 projection assuming MTP Investments and 90%
electric vehicle fleet)
Wetland Impacts
Approximate area of wetland/wetland buffer impacts based
on the estimated limits of disturbance for the interchange
improvements
River Corridors
Approximate area of river corridor, floodway, and 100-year
flood zone impacts based on the estimated limits of
disturbance for the interchange improvements
Goal: Economic Access
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
ECONOMIC ACCESS: Improve economic access and vitality in Chittenden County.
Connectivity to Areas
Planned for Growth
Percentage of land area within 1 mile of interchange that is
classified as an ECOS Growth Zone (includes Center,
Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Percentage of area within 1 mile of
interchange in ECOS Growth Zone N/A 87%90%90%100%100%
Total number of projected new jobs in 2050 compared to
2020 within 1 radial mile of the interchange including
adopted job projections and secondary growth
Total number of New Jobs within 1 Radial
Mile of the Interchange N/A 3,054 2,461 2,461 4,133 4,133
Total number of projected 2050 jobs within 1 radial mile of
the new interchange infrastructure including adopted job
projections and secondary growth
Total Number of Jobs Within 1 Radial Mile
of Interchange N/A 11,416 9,592 9,592 27,220 27,220
Job Access
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 142050 Base
Scenario
Goal: Economic Access
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
ECONOMIC ACCESS: Improve economic access and vitality in Chittenden County.
Connectivity to Areas
Planned for Growth
Percentage of land area within 1 mile of interchange that is
classified as an ECOS Growth Zone (includes Center,
Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Percentage of area within 1 mile of
interchange in ECOS Growth Zone 0 1 1 4 4
Total number of projected new jobs in 2050 compared to
2020 within 1 radial mile of the interchange including
adopted job projections and secondary growth
Total number of New Jobs within 1 Radial
Mile of the Interchange 1 0 0 4 4
Total number of projected 2050 jobs within 1 radial mile of
the new interchange infrastructure including adopted job
projections and secondary growth
Total Number of Jobs Within 1 Radial Mile
of Interchange 0 0 0 4 4
Job Access
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 14
Goal: System Preservation
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
SYSTEM PRESERVATION: Preserve and improve the condition and performance of the I-89 corridor.
Asset Maintenance Cost Estimated 30-year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13
& 14 combined
Asset Maintenance Cost (Bridges & Culverts)
for Exits 12B, 13, & 14 combined (not
including assets replaced with construction)
$94,151,074 $88,516,699 $90,832,324 $48,464,064 $74,859,153 $84,840,338
Planning-Level Cost Estimate (millions of
2020 dollars) (Includes PE, CON, and
contingency)
$0 $29,000,000 $15,000,000 $61,000,000 $44,000,000 $37,000,000
Remaining MTP Allocation for Interstate and
Interchange Projects (MTP Allocation - Cost
Estimate)
$74,300,000 $45,300,000 $59,300,000 $13,300,000 $30,300,000 $37,300,000
Total 2050 Cost (inclusive of asset
maintenance and new construction costs)$94,151,074 $117,516,699 $105,832,324 $109,464,064 $118,859,153 $121,840,338
Incremental Additional Cost $0 $23,365,625 $11,681,250 $15,312,990 $24,708,079 $27,689,264
Construction Cost Estimated cost for the interchange improvements
Maintenance &
Construction Cost
Estimated cost for the interchange improvements plus 30-
year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 & 14
combined
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 142050 Base
Scenario
Goal: System Preservation
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
SYSTEM PRESERVATION: Preserve and improve the condition and performance of the I-89 corridor.
Asset Maintenance Cost Estimated 30-year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13
& 14 combined
Asset Maintenance Cost (Bridges & Culverts)
for Exits 12B, 13, & 14 combined (not
including assets replaced with construction)0 0 4 1 0
Planning-Level Cost Estimate (millions of
2020 dollars) (Includes PE, CON, and
contingency)
3 4 0 1 2
Remaining MTP Allocation for Interstate and
Interchange Projects (MTP Allocation - Cost
Estimate)
Total 2050 Cost (inclusive of asset
maintenance and new construction costs)1 4 3 0 0
Incremental Additional Cost
Estimated cost for the interchange improvements
Estimated cost for the interchange improvements plus 30-
year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 & 14
combined
Construction Cost
Maintenance &
Construction Cost
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 14
Next Steps
Initial Draft I-89 Corridor Bundles
Investments Bundle 1 Bundle 2 Bundle 3
Transit (new service, increased frequency, etc.)✓✓✓
Biking (lanes, paths, signals, etc.)✓✓✓
Walking (sidewalks, paths, crosswalks, signals, etc.)✓✓✓
Transportation Demand Management (park and ride lots,
ridesharing, telecommuting, TMA, etc.)
✓✓✓
Intelligent Transportation Systems (signage, signals, etc.)✓✓✓
Ramp improvements at Exit 14 -Route 2 WB to 89 NB ✓✓✓?
Reduce ramp terminal radii along US 2 to slow speeds ✓✓✓?
Either Exit 12B, Exit 13 Hybrid, or Exit 13 Single Point
Diamond Interchange
✓✓
Either Enhanced Cloverleaf or Diverging Diamond
Interchange at Exit 14
✓
Seeking Input
Metrics and Scoring, February-March:
▪Are there any additional metrics that should be evaluated at this
stage?
▪Should some of the metrics be scored on a different basis?
Next Steps, April:
▪Which of Enhanced Cloverleaf or Diverging Diamond Interchange at
Exit 14 should be included?
▪Which of Exit 12B, Exit 13 Hybrid, or Exit 13 Single Point Diamond
Interchange should be included?
▪Any other specific suggestions as to what should be included in
bundles?
Next Steps
▪Second Round Interchange Evaluation
–Outreach to Underrepresented Populations: February -March
–Other interested committees/groups: February -March
–South Burlington City Council: February 16th and March 15th
–Online Public Meeting: March 18th
–South Burlington City Council: April 19th
▪Advisory Committee Meeting #5: April/May
▪Corridor Evaluation & Public/Stakeholder Involvement:
Spring/Summer/Fall 2021
–Includes identifying the need for I-89 widening in Bundles 2
and/or 3
▪Draft & Final Report: Winter 2022
Thank you!
▪Charlie Baker cbaker@ccrpcvt.org
▪Eleni Churchill echurchill@ccrpcvt.org
Stay Connected!
Web: www.envision89.com
Twitter: @envision89
Facebook: Envision89
Please reach out to us if you would like to
request a similar presentation for a City
Committee, Neighborhood Group, etc.
This presentation as well as Interchange Evaluation Matrices
and Modelling Results and a separate pdf with Technical
Memos for review can be found on this project webpage under
Task 4: https://envision89.com/project-overview2
Exit 12B
New Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
SAFETY: Enhance safety along the I-89 Study Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users
Ramp Spacing Meets AASHTO Standard for Ramp Spacing to Next Closest
Interchange Yes / No N/A Yes Yes*Yes Yes Yes
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change in
Total Crashes across the Network
% Change in Total Estimated Crashes
Compared to 2050 Base Scenario N/A -3.2%-1.3%0.4%-5.0%-2.8%
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change in
Fatal and Injury Crashes across the Network
% Change in Estimated Injury / Fatal
Crashes Compared to 2050 Base Scenario N/A -1.1%-1.9%-3.1%-4.5%-2.3%
Bike/Ped Safety
Safety Improvements for Bicyclists and Pedestrians based on
Proposed Accommodations, Number of Conflicts Points, and
Type of Conflict Point
Relative Level of Safety Improvement for
Bicyclists and Pedestrians N/A Improved Significantly
Improved
Significantly
Improved Improved Significantly
Improved
Safety / Operational
Commentary
*Left Off-Ramp
and Left On-Ramp
Not Advised
Declassify I-189
from Interstate to
Limited Access State
Highway
C-D Road Advised
at Current/Future
Volumes for Loop
Ramps
Removes Merge
on Mainline
LIVABLE, SUSTAINABLE, & HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: Promote compact growth that supports livable, affordable, vibrant, and healthy communities.
Total Secondary Growth Households 0 593 203 203 0 0
Proportion of 2020 to 2050 Household
Growth Located in Growth Zones Inclusive of
Secondary Growth 90.24%90.40%90.33%90.33%90.24%90.24%
ROW Impacts Approximate area of ROW impacts based on limit of
disturbance around the interchange Acres of ROW Disturbance N/A 4.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1
Additional Travel Time for Traffic Analysis Zones Identified as EJ
communities Minutes of Additional Travel Time in 2050 N/A 0.019 0.022 0.011 0.018 0.023
Average Trip Length in the Model Average Trip Length in minutes 15.69 15.61 15.66 15.68 15.69 15.72
Additional Travel Time for EJ TAZs as a Percent of Average Trip
Length
% Additional Travel Time per Average Trip
in 2050 N/A 0.12%0.14%0.07%0.12%0.15%
MOBILITY & EFFICIENCY: Improve the efficiency and reliability of the I-89 Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users.
Daily trips using new interchange in 2050 Total Trips Using New Interchange in 2050 N/A 24,321 56,198 57,334 49,677 46,924
# of Daily Trips Using Exit 14 51,929 47,226 46,654 45,319 49,677 46,924
Percent Change in # of Daily Trips Using
Exit 14 N/A -9.1%-10.2%-12.7%-4.3%-9.6%
Total VMT 5,207,449 5,219,058 5,206,473 5,201,707 5,203,632 5,200,102
Average Trip Length in miles 8.103 8.087 8.097 8.090 8.097 8.092
% Change in average trip length in 2050 N/A -0.20%-0.07%-0.17%-0.07%-0.14%
Total VHT 147,758 147,394 147,452 147,636 147,737 147,906
% Change in VHT in 2050 N/A -0.25%-0.21%-0.08%-0.01%0.10%
I-89 Corridor V/C Mainline corridor congestion as indicated by the number of
miles with v/c of greater than or equal to 0.9 Miles of Mainline with v/c > 0.9 1.34 2.18 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34
Average Delay Change in 2050 PM Peak Hour Delay at Exit 14 Change in Average Delay per Trip (seconds) N/A -40 -34 -37 -47 -41
Bike/Ped Connectivity Bicyclist and Pedestrian Connectivity Improvements Across I-
89 Based on Existing and Proposed Accomodations Level of Bike/Ped Connectivity Improvements N/A Improved Significantly
Improved
Significantly
Improved Improved Improved
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: Establish a resilient I-89 Corridor that minimizes environmental impacts associated with the transportation system.
Acres of Impact to VSWI W etlands N/A 0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0
Acres of Impact to 50 ft Wetland Buffers N/A 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.3 0
Acres of Impact to River Corridors N/A 0 1.1 1.8 0 0
Acres of Impact to 100-year Flood Zone N/A 0 1.1 0.5 0 0
Natural Habitats
Approximate area of rare, threatened, and endangered (RTE)
species impacts based on the estimated limits of disturbance
for the interchange improvements
Acres of RTE Impacts N/A 7 0 0 0 0
Resilience Percent Change Network Trip Robustness (NTR)Percent change in robustness N/A -0.38%0.81%0.93%-0.08%-0.14%
Total Gallons of Fuel Consumed per Day in
2050 40,744 40,835 40,736 40,699 40,714 40,686
% Change in Gallons of Fuel Consumed per
Day in 2050 N/A 0.22%-0.02%-0.11%-0.07%-0.14%
ECONOMIC ACCESS: Improve economic access and vitality in Chittenden County.
Connectivity to Areas
Planned for Growth
Percentage of land area within 1 mile of interchange that is
classified as an ECOS Growth Zone (includes Center, Enterprise,
Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Percentage of area within 1 mile of
interchange in ECOS Growth Zone N/A 87%90%90%100%100%
Total number of projected new jobs in 2050 compared to 2020
within 1 radial mile of the interchange including adopted job
projections and secondary growth
Total number of New Jobs within 1 Radial
Mile of the Interchange N/A 3,054 2,461 2,461 4,133 4,133
Total number of projected 2050 jobs within 1 radial mile of the
new interchange infrastructure including adopted job
projections and secondary growth
Total Number of Jobs Within 1 Radial Mile
of Interchange N/A 11,416 9,592 9,592 27,220 27,220
SYSTEM PRESERVATION: Preserve and improve the condition and performance of the I-89 corridor.
Asset Maintenance Cost Estimated 30-year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 &
14 combined
Asset Maintenance Cost (Bridges & Culverts)
for Exits 12B, 13, & 14 combined (not
including assets replaced with construction)
$94,151,074 $88,516,699 $90,832,324 $48,464,064 $74,859,153 $84,840,338
Construction Cost Estimated cost for the interchange improvements
Planning-Level Cost Estimate (millions of
2020 dollars) (Includes PE, CON, and
contingency)
$0 $29,000,000 $15,000,000 $61,000,000 $44,000,000 $37,000,000
Total 2050 Cost (inclusive of asset
maintenance and new construction costs)$94,151,074 $117,516,699 $105,832,324 $109,464,064 $118,859,153 $121,840,338
Incremental Additional Cost $0 $23,365,625 $11,681,250 $15,312,990 $24,708,079 $27,689,264
Total Fuel Consumption Across Model Network (based on
2050 projection assuming MTP Investments and 90% electric
vehicle fleet)
Networkwide change in Vehicle Hours of Travel (VHT) with
interchange improvement and projected growth compared to
the Future Base Model
Approximate area of river corridor, floodway, and 100-year
flood zone impacts based on the estimated limits of
disturbance for the interchange improvements
VHT
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 142050 Base
Scenario
Safety Impact
Environmental Justice /
Underserved Populations
Consistent with Regional
Plan
Proportion of 2020 to 2050 Household Growth Located in
Growth Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth (includes Center,
Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Interchange Trips Number of daily trips using the Exit 14 Interchange. (Note: For
scoring purposes, larger reductions at Exit 12B and 13 were scored
higher, while at Exit 14, lower reductions were scored higher)
Maintenance &
Construction Cost
Estimated cost for the interchange improvements plus 30-year
asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 & 14 combined
Job Access
Fuel Consumption
Networkwide change in Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) per
vehicle trip with interchange improvement and projected
growth compared to the Future Base Model
VMT
Wetland Impacts
Approximate area of wetland/wetland buffer impacts based on
the estimated limits of disturbance for the interchange
improvements
River Corridors
Note: The grey cells include data for information purposes only.
Exit 12B
New Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
SAFETY: Enhance safety along the I-89 Study Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users
Ramp Spacing Meets AASHTO Standard for Ramp Spacing to Next Closest
Interchange Yes / No 4 3 4 4 4
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change in
Total Crashes across the Network
% Change in Total Estimated Crashes
Compared to 2050 Base Scenario 3 1 0 4 2
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Change in
Fatal and Injury Crashes across the Network
% Change in Estimated Injury / Fatal
Crashes Compared to 2050 Base Scenario 0 1 2 4 1
Bike/Ped Safety
Safety Improvements for Bicyclists and Pedestrians based on
Proposed Accommodations, Number of Conflicts Points, and
Type of Conflict Point
Relative Level of Safety Improvement for
Bicyclists and Pedestrians 2 4 4 2 4
Safety / Operational
Commentary
*Left Off-Ramp
and Left On-Ramp
Not Advised
Declassify I-189
from Interstate to
Limited Access State
Highway
C-D Road Advised
at Current/Future
Volumes for Loop
Ramps
Removes Merge
on Mainline
LIVABLE, SUSTAINABLE, & HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: Promote compact growth that supports livable, affordable, vibrant, and healthy communities.
Total Secondary Growth Households
Proportion of 2050 Households Located in
Growth Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth 4 4 4 4 4
ROW Impacts Approximate area of ROW impacts based on limit of
disturbance around the interchange Acres of ROW Disturbance 0 3 4 3 4
Additional Travel Time for Traffic Analysis Zones Identified as EJ
communities Minutes of Additional Travel Time in 2050
Average Trip Length in the Model Average Trip Length in minutes
Additional Travel Time as a Percent of Average Trip Length % Additional Travel Time per Average Trip
in 2050 2 2 2 2 2
MOBILITY & EFFICIENCY: Improve the efficiency and reliability of the I-89 Corridor and Adjacent Interchanges for all users.
Daily trips using new interchange in 2050 Total Trips Using New Interchange in 2050
# of Daily Trips Using Exit 14
Percent Change in # of Daily Trips Using
Exit 14 2 3 4 0 3
Total VMT
Average Trip Length in miles
% Change in average trip length in 2050 4 0 3 0 2
Total VHT
% Change in VHT in 2050 4 4 2 1 0
I-89 Corridor V/C Mainline corridor congestion as indicated by the number of
miles with v/c of greater than or equal to 0.9 Miles of Mainline with v/c > 0.9 0 4 4 4 4
Average Delay Change in 2050 PM Peak Hour Delay at Exit 14 Change in Average Delay per Trip (seconds) 2 0 1 4 2
Bike/Ped Connectivity Bicyclist and Pedestrian Connectivity Improvements Across I-
89 Based on Existing and Proposed Accomodations Level of Bike/Ped Connectivity Improvements 2 4 4 2 2
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: Establish a resilient I-89 Corridor that minimizes environmental impacts associated with the transportation system.
Acres of Impact to VSWI W etlands 4 0 4 4 4
Acres of Impact to 50 ft Wetland Buffers 4 0 2 3 4
Acres of Impact to River Corridors 4 1 0 4 4
Acres of Impact to 100-year Flood Zone 4 0 2 4 4
Natural Habitats
Approximate area of rare, threatened, and endangered (RTE)
species impacts based on the estimated limits of disturbance
for the interchange improvements
Acres of RTE Impacts 0 4 4 4 4
Resilience Percent Change Network Trip Robustness (NTR)Percent change in robustness 0 4 4 1 0
Total Gallons of Fuel Consumed per Day in
2050
% Change in Gallons of Fuel Consumed per
Day in 2050 0 3 4 4 4
ECONOMIC ACCESS: Improve economic access and vitality in Chittenden County.
Connectivity to Areas
Planned for Growth
Percentage of land area within 1 mile of interchange that is
classified as an ECOS Growth Zone (includes Center, Enterprise,
Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Percentage of area within 1 mile of
interchange in ECOS Growth Zone 0 1 1 4 4
Total number of projected new jobs in 2050 compared to 2020
within 1 radial mile of the interchange including adopted job
projections and secondary growth
Total number of New Jobs within 1 Radial
Mile of the Interchange 1 0 0 4 4
Total number of projected 2050 jobs within 1 radial mile of the
new interchange infrastructure including adopted job
projections and secondary growth
Total Number of Jobs Within 1 Radial Mile
of Interchange 0 0 0 4 4
SYSTEM PRESERVATION: Preserve and improve the condition and performance of the I-89 corridor.
Asset Maintenance Cost Estimated 30-year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 &
14 combined
Asset Maintenance Cost (Bridges & Culverts)
for Exits 12B, 13, & 14 combined (not
including assets replaced with construction)
0 0 4 1 0
Construction Cost Estimated cost for the interchange improvements
Planning-Level Cost Estimate (millions of
2020 dollars) (Includes PE, CON, and
contingency)
3 4 0 1 2
Total 2050 Cost (inclusive of asset
maintenance and new construction costs)1 4 3 0 0
Incremental Additional Cost
Networkwide change in Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) per
vehicle trip with interchange improvement and projected
growth compared to the Future Base Model
Fuel Consumption
Total Fuel Consumption Across Model Network (based on
2050 projection assuming MTP Investments and 90% electric
vehicle fleet)
Wetland Impacts
Approximate area of wetland/wetland buffer impacts based on
the estimated limits of disturbance for the interchange
improvements
River Corridors
Approximate area of river corridor, floodway, and 100-year
flood zone impacts based on the estimated limits of
disturbance for the interchange improvements
VHT
Networkwide change in Vehicle Hours of Travel (VHT) with
interchange improvement and projected growth compared to
the Future Base Model
VMT
Proportion of 2050 Households Located in ECOS Growth
Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth (includes Center,
Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 14
Safety Impact
Consistent with Regional
Plan
Environmental Justice /
Underserved Populations
Estimated cost for the interchange improvements plus 30-year
asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 & 14 combined
Interchange Trips
Number of daily trips using the Exit 14 Interchange
Maintenance &
Construction Cost
Job Access
MEMORANDUM
To: Charlie Baker, Eleni Churchill, Jason Charest
From: David Saladino, Karen Sentoff, Jeff Bachiochi
Date: February 11, 2021
Subject: Technical Memo on Estimating Construction and Asset Maintenance Costs &
Consistency with Regional Plan Metrics
________________________________________________________________________________________________
This memorandum provides an overview of the following elements of the second-round interchange
evaluation currently being conducted for the Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study:
• Summary of Construction and Asset Maintenance Cost Estimation Metrics
• Summary of Consistency with Regional Plan Metric
Summary of Construction and Asset Maintenance Cost Estimation Metrics
To align with the goal of preserving and improving the condition and performance of the I-89 corridor,
metrics regarding the construction capital costs and asset maintenance costs were included in the interchange
evaluation. The approximate capital costs for design and construction include the costs to construct,
reconstruct, or decommission any existing infrastructure within each respective alternative’s footprint. This
analysis offers a way to compare the relative costs of each interchange alternative by considering both (a) the
capital cost and (b) the cost to maintain the existing infrastructure outside of each project footprint.
Between 2020 and 2050, it is expected that substantial investment will be needed to maintain the existing
infrastructure that exists within the study area. The most significant maintenance costs over this timeframe
are expected for existing bridges and culverts. For the purpose of this evaluation, an “analysis area” was
defined to be all the bridges and culverts that fall within the footprint of any of the five interchange concepts.
Asset maintenance costs outside this analysis area would be same for all alternatives and were therefore
neglected.
In coordination with the VTrans Asset Management Bureau, network-level information, engineering
judgement, and historic unit-costs of likely treatments were used to approximate expected maintenance costs
assigned to each existing bridge and culvert based on its age and condition. From this evaluation, a total cost
to maintain all assets within the analysis area was found to be approximately $94 million, which is effectively
the maintenance cost of a ‘No-Build’ scenario between 2020 and 2050 for the existing bridges and culverts
located at the three interchanges being evaluated.
The fundamental principle guiding this assessment was to see how spending capital funds at an interchange
can reduce future maintenance costs for the broader system. For each interchange alternative, there are
several assets that would be repaired, replaced, or decommissioned as part of the construction or
reconstruction of the interchange, and the sum of those maintenance costs can be assigned to each
interchange alternative as “saved” maintenance costs.
Page | 2
When considering the likely time delay between this study and the start of a capital improvement project, it is
not realistic to assume that 100% of those maintenance costs could be avoided. Therefore, this analysis
assumes that 25% of these “saved” maintenance costs will be spent prior to project implementation,
regardless of the chosen alternative.
Figure 1 below shows the three construction and asset maintenance cost metrics included in the second
round interchange evaluation matrix. The three metrics were calculated as follows:
• Construction Cost: Estimated cost for the interchange improvements, including engineering,
construction, and contingency. Costs also include replacement or rehabilitation of existing assets (i.e.,
bridges and culverts) within each project footprint.
• Asset Maintenance Cost: Sum of (a) maintenance costs for assets outside the project footprint, plus
(b) the unavoidable maintenance costs of assets within the project footprint (i.e., 25% of the “saved”
maintenance costs).
• Maintenance & Construction Cost: Construction cost plus asset maintenance cost.
Figure 1: Draft Construction and Asset Maintenance Cost Metrics
Summary of Consistency with Regional Plan Metric
The CCRPC’s ECOS Regional Plan has a goal of directing 90% of future household growth to areas planned for
growth (i.e., areas designated as Center, Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban in the ECOS Plan). To
evaluate the consistency of the five interchange alternatives with this goal, the magnitude and location of
projected household growth associated with each interchange alternative was evaluated.
The projected household growth was assumed to be the number of households added between 2020 and
2050 inclusive of Secondary Growth for each scenario at the Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) level. In this
context, Secondary Growth is defined as the added land development that is anticipated to occur because of
the enhanced accessibility and connectivity provided by the interchange investment. This development could
be new to the area or attracted from growth that would have occurred in another part of the county.
Secondary Growth associated with the interchange alternatives was estimated based on feedback from a
Delphi Panel which was convened on July 28, 2020. A technical memorandum describing the Delphi Panel
approach and estimation of Secondary Growth is provided as an attachment to this memo.
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
SYSTEM PRESERVATION: Preserve and improve the condition and performance of the I-89 corridor.
Construction Cost Estimated cost for the interchange improvements Planning-Level Cost Estimate (millions of 2020 dollars) (Includes PE, CON, and contingency)$0 $29,000,000 $15,000,000 $61,000,000 $44,000,000 $37,000,000
Asset Maintenance Cost Estimated 30-year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13
& 14 combined
Asset Maintenance Cost (Bridges & Culverts)
for Exits 12B, 13, & 14 combined (not
including assets replaced with construction)
$94,151,074 $88,516,699 $90,832,324 $48,464,064 $74,859,153 $84,840,338
Total 2050 Cost (inclusive of asset
maintenance and new construction costs)$94,151,074 $117,516,699 $105,832,324 $109,464,064 $118,859,153 $121,840,338
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 142050 Base
Scenario
Maintenance & Construction Cost
Estimated cost for the interchange improvements plus 30-
year asset maintenance costs at Exits 12B, 13 & 14
combined
Page | 3
Figure 2 below shows the following consistency with Regional Plan metrics included in the second round
interchange evaluation matrix:
• Total Secondary Growth Households: The total number of additional households projected to be
added from 2020 to 2050 as a result of the Secondary Growth associated with each interchange
alternative. These values are provided for informational purposes and are not scored in the overall
evaluation matrix.
• Proportion of 2020 to 2050 Household Growth Located in Growth Zones Inclusive of Secondary
Growth: This metric identifies the proportion of new residential growth (2020-2050) falling within a
designated growth area for each interchange alternative. To calculate this metric, the TAZ boundaries
were overlaid with the areas targeted for growth in the ECOS Plan, which include Center, Enterprise,
Metro, Village and Suburban land use designations. A TAZ, and therefore its households, were
included in the area targeted for growth if there was at least 90% coverage of the TAZ within a
designated growth zone. For those TAZs with partial coverage by growth areas, it was assumed that
80% of the households would be directed to those areas targeted for growth and 20% would fall in
areas designated as Rural. Those TAZs that had complete coverage by the Rural land use designation
were considered outside of the growth areas. As noted in the table below, 90.24% of household
growth between 2020 and 2050 is expected to occur in designated growth areas in the 2050 Base
Scenario (i.e., no interchanges and no Secondary Growth). The additional Secondary Growth
households associated with the Exit 12B and Exit 13 alternatives largely fall within designated growth
areas and result in metric values slightly higher than the 2050 Base Scenario.
Figure 2: Draft Consistency with Regional Plan Metric
Exit 12B
New
Interchange
Hybrid + Bike
Overpass SPDI
Enhanced
Cloverleaf DDI
LIVABLE, SUSTAINABLE, & HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: Promote compact growth that supports livable, affordable, vibrant, and healthy communities.
Total Secondary Growth Households 0 593 203 203 0 0
Proportion of 2020 to 2050 Household
Growth Located in Growth Zones Inclusive of
Secondary Growth 90.24%90.40%90.33%90.33%90.24%90.24%
Chittenden County I-89 2050 Study
DRAFT Second Round Interchange Screening Matrix
Metric Metric Description Units
Exit 13 Exit 142050 Base
Scenario
Consistent with Regional
Plan
Proportion of 2020 to 2050 Household Growth Located in
Growth Zones Inclusive of Secondary Growth (includes
Center, Enterprise, Metro, Village and Suburban Designations)
MEMO
RSG 55 Railroad Row, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 www.rsginc.com
TO: Charlie Baker and Eleni Churchill, CCRPC FROM: Jonathan Slason, Benjamin Swanson, and Stephen Lawe, RSG CC: David Saladino, VHB DATE: February 11, 2021 SUBJECT: I-89 Secondary Land Use
Introduction
Direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts are required to be considered in transportation
projects as established in the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (40
CFR §§ 1500-1508). The emphasis of this memorandum is to summarize the activities to
evaluate indirect effects, specifically around land use and development, of the proposed
transportation investments being considered in the Interstate 89 (I-89) Corridor project.
Per FHWA, “Indirect effects are caused by the action and are later in time or farther
removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. Indirect effects may include
growth inducing effects and other effects related to induced changes in the pattern of
land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air and water and
other natural systems, including ecosystems.” (40 CFR § 1508.8) 1
The concept of indirect effects is effectively encapsulated by the following graphic
(Figure 1), which shows there are anticipated and likely actions that are a result of the
initial project actions that result in indirect effects. Case law has determined that these
likely actions should be based on reasonableness and how ‘ordinary’ persons would act
and need not to consider all conceivable impacts.2 Note that CEQ regulations use
“impact” and “effect” synonymously (40 CFR §1508.8).
1 https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/nepa/QAimpact.aspx 2 Sierra Club v. Marsh, 976 F.2d 763, 767 (1st Cir. 1992)
2
FIGURE 1: DIRECT VS. INDIRECT EFFECTS
Source: FHWA
FHWA uses the terms “secondary impacts” and “indirect impacts” interchangeably. For
the purposes of the I-89 Project, the team uses “secondary” as the preferred term used
herein.
Secondary Growth
The secondary growth impacts associated with the proposed transportation projects are
evaluated by first considering the direct effects of the projects, then making reasonable
forecasts of the secondary land use and economic effects, and lastly analyzing the
resulting changes in travel demand.
The project team convened a Delphi panel to
evaluate the potential secondary land use
effects3 of the Interstate 89 (I-89) Corridor
project within Chittenden County. The panel’s
meeting was held on the morning of July 28,
2020 over the Zoom video conferencing
platform. Six panel members with expertise in
commercial and residential development as
well as community planning were present.
Stephen Lawe of RSG led panel members
through a facilitated and structured set of questions and open conversation.
The following six panel members with expertise in commercial and residential
development as well as community planning were present:
• Brian Shupe, Executive Director, Vermont Natural Resources Council
• Paul Conner, AICP, Director of Planning & Zoning, City of South Burlington
• Dean Pierce, Director of Planning & Zoning, Town of Shelburne
3 Secondary growth, in this context, is the land development that is anticipated to occur because of the infrastructure project. This development could be new to the area or attracted from growth that would have occurred in another part of the county.
Delphi Panel: Outside experts and/or stakeholders are engaged in a collaborative discussion, typically through a structured process that also includes professional planners. The collaborative process is used to develop an estimate of the likely effects of a transportation project on land use. (AASHTO Assessing Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts under NEPA, 2016)
3
• Chris Snyder, President, Snyder Homes
• Jeff Nick, President, NAI J.L. Davis Realty
• Bart Frisbee, President, Sterling Homes
The group discussed the land use changes that would likely occur if investments were
made in the I-89 corridor. These investments focused on a set of preliminary projects
including: a potential interchange at Vermont Route 116 (VT 116) known as Exit 12B,
additional ramps creating new connections at Exit 13, operational enhancements at Exit
14 as well as a new northbound off-ramp configuration at Exit 14. Additionally, the effect
of widening the segment of I-89 between Exit 14 and Exit 15 was also considered.
The panel landed on three secondary land use scenarios associated with I-89
investments:
1. Exit 14 University Mall: Modest amount of commercial growth in and around the
mall.
2. Exit 13, 14, interstate widening between Exits 14 and 15: Slight residential
growth north of the project area and in downtown Burlington.
3. Exit 12B: Significant commercial and residential growth proximate to project with
a modest regional growth in residential development.
The degree of change in the land use was quantified by the panel using the terms slight,
modest, and significant. The I-89 project team translated the terms into magnitudes of
change from the baseline future conditions, with a slight change less than 10%, a
modest degree of change would result in a 10–20% difference, and a significant change
would result in something more than 20%.
The future baseline conditions from which these changes are compared to is based on
the forecast growth that the CCRPC has developed within the most recent ECOS
Metropolitan Transportation Long Range Plan (MTP) adopted June 20, 2018.4 The panel
and the initial forecasts all used a 15-year horizon out to 2035 to estimate the secondary
growth effects. The out year of 2035 is close enough to envision without being too close
to today’s specific conditions. The 2020-2035 forecasted growth was then projected out
to 2050 to align with the project’s horizon year. A discussion of the 2035-2050 growth
projections are discussed later in the memo.
Table 1 lists the amount of secondary growth associated with each of the above
scenarios by 2035 based on input from the Delphi panel. The growth is identified as that
which would be reallocated from forecasted growth elsewhere in the county and growth
that would be in addition to the established control totals identified in the future baseline
conditions.
4 ECOS. 2017. “2018 Chittenden County ECOS Plan: Supplement 5 – Metropolitan Transportation Plan.” Adopted 6/20/2018. Available at: http://www.ecosproject.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ECOSPlan_MTPSupplement5_Final_20180615.pdf.
4
TABLE 1: SECONDARY LAND USE BY 2035—SUMMARY OF RESULTS
SECONDARY GROWTH SCENARIO
NEW RESIDENTIAL (HH)
REALLOCATED RESIDENTIAL (HH)
NEW COMMERCIAL (EMP)
REALLOCATED COMMERCIAL (EMP)
1) Exit 14 U Mall. Modest commercial growth in and around U Mall. – – 78 78
2) Exit 13, 14, Widening btwn. Exits 14 and 15. Slight residential growth north and in downtown.
101 – – –
Franklin County growth 31 – – –
3) Exit 12B. Significant commercial and residential proximate to project, modest regional growth in residential.
186 155 450 450
Notes: HH – Household EMP - Employees U Mall – University Mall
Scenario 1: Exit 14 University Mall5
Panel members agreed that improvements at Exit 14 could create modest new
commercial land use growth in the area. This is because the improvements would create
an off-ramp through the current University Mall property and intersect Dorset Street at
either the Market Street or Garden Street intersection. Panel members also indicated
that the magnitude of secondary growth is likely to be 50/50 in terms of reallocating
already planned growth in the county versus creating new growth in the county.
Figure 2 shows the numbered traffic analysis zones (TAZs) in the project vicinity.
Approximately 780 new employees are included in the CCRPC forecast for these TAZs
through 2035.
5 The University Mall Exit 14 scenario was removed from further consideration after the secondary growth Delphi panel process.
5
FIGURE 2: TAZS IN THE PROJECT VICINITY (EXIT 14 U. MALL RAMP)
Source: RSG (background via ArcGIS Online)
TAZ number
6
The panel identified that the Exit 14 ramp would generate a modest increase in
secondary commercial growth. Table 2 shows the percentage increase of secondary
growth that would be added to the 780 employees in the impacted TAZs.
TABLE 2: SCENARIO 1 EMPLOYMENT GROWTH
% INCREASE SECONDARY GROWTH EMPLOYMENT
10% (modest) 78
15% (modest) 117
20% (modest) 156
25% (significant) 196
The panel’s proposed modest amount of secondary growth has been interpreted to
mean that a 20% increase could be plausible, resulting in 156 additional employees in
the affected area. The project team suggests using the higher end of the modest range
as this reflects the opportunity for reimagining what the area would look like if this ramp
went in.
Of the 156 employees attributed to secondary growth associated with the Exit 14
University Mall ramp, 78 would come from previously forecast growth in the county and
78 would be new employees in excess of the countywide control totals.
Scenario 2: Exit 13, 14, Widening between Exit 14 and Exit 15—Slight Residential Growth North and in Downtown Burlington
Scenario 2 accounts for the land use changes associated with any of the improvements
at Exit 13, Exit 14 (excluding the University Mall ramp), and interstate mainline widening
between Exit 14 and Exit 15. The degree of land use change is not expected to vary
whether one or more of these changes were to occur (i.e., the total land use change is
the same regardless of whether Exit 13 is pursued in addition to interstate widening, or
whether only one of the improvements are made).
The panel indicated that these improvements would result in slight changes in residential
land uses in central areas (Burlington and South Burlington) and areas to the north
(Colchester, Milton, and Franklin County). This scenario assumes that the secondary
residential growth would be new growth to the county, above the forecast control totals.
The effect on travel time savings is a valuable proxy to estimate the degree of impact
any change in transportation capacity is likely to have. The effects of the additional
capacity associated with any of these projects (Exit 14, Exit 13, and mainline widening
between Exit 14 and 15), was estimated to have up to 2–3 minutes of travel time savings
to a few locations.6
To estimate the degree of change warranted by this travel time savings, a sample trip to
the north between Burlington and St. Albans is used. An existing travel time of 34
6 The regional travel demand model, which was run early in the project, showed the travel time savings for a mainline widening between Exit 13 and Exit 16 resulted in a time savings of <2 minutes at the Franklin county border during the PM peak hour.
7
minutes between Burlington and St. Albans could potentially require 2 or 3 fewer
minutes, or a reduction of approximately 6% (in the absence of induced traffic and
secondary growth). This is estimated by the isochrones in Figure 3 and Figure 4 which
compares the area to the north that is reachable when the origin of the trip shifts 2-3
minutes further north (from Battery Street to Prospect Street).
FIGURE 3: ISOCHRONE FROM DOWNTOWN BURLINGTON (BATTERY/MAIN)
Source: Travel Time App
8
FIGURE 4: ISOCHRONE 2–3 MINUTES CLOSER TO ST. ALBANS (PROSPECT/MAIN)
Source: Travel Time App7
The panel’s belief of slight residential growth was evaluated for levels of 2.5%, 5%, and
7.5% increases in residential household units in excess of the forecast growth. The
amount of forecast growth and secondary growth is shown for each geography in Table
3.
7 TravelTime. “Map Demo.” Available at: https://app.traveltime.com/search/0_lat=44.47618&0_lng=-
73.20561&0_title=Pomodoros%2C%20South%20Burlington%2C%20VT%2C%20USA&0_mode=driving.
9
TABLE 3: SCENARIO 2 HOUSEHOLD GROWTH
SCENARIO 2 FORECAST GROWTH (2020–2035) 2.5% 5.0% 7.5%
Central
Burlington 1,683 42 84 126
South Burlington 1,135 28 57 85
Net Increase 2,818 70 141 211
% of Anticipated
County Growth (6,829) – 1.0% 2.1% 3.1%
Points North
Colchester 814 20 41 61
Milton 422 11 21 32
Net Increase 1,236 31 62 93
% of Anticipated County Growth (6,829) – 0.5% 0.9% 1.4%
Total county growth – 101 203 304
% of Anticipated
County Growth (6,829) – 1.5% 3.0% 4.5%
Franklin County
Net Increase 1,228 31 61 92
All Areas
Net increase
(central & north Chittenden Ctny., Franklin Ctny.)
–
132 264 396 Total % of NW Vermont Growth
(8,057 HH units forecast 2020-2035)
8,057
1.6% 3.3% 4.9%
Total % of State
Growth (10,000 HH forecast 2020-2035) – 1.3% 2.6% 4.0%
Notes: HH – Household NW – Northwest
The increase in access seen in areas of the county is supported by the panel’s assertion
that areas central and north of the improvements would experience a slight degree of
change associated with the improvement in travel time.
Travel time is just one of many factors that influences whether an individual changes
travel patterns, let alone where they live and work. As such, changes in capacity do not
directly affect the underlying land development patterns in a linear or straightforward
way, which is why the Delphi panel approach is valuable.
However, recent research8 points to a related aspect, which examines how expanding
capacity may result in that capacity serving new traffic over time, thereby increasing
overall net vehicle miles traveled (VMT). According to this research, induced demand is
8 Volker, J. M. B., Lee, A. E., and S. Handy. 2020. “Induced Vehicle Travel in the Environmental Review
Process.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674(7), 468–479. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0361198120923365.
10
often underestimated during the project planning process. Among the study’s findings
was that between 5–21% of the increase in VMT was associated with an increase in
population. It follows that some of that change will not only be existing users, but future
users (new households).
The estimated travel savings of 6% in travel time influences the degree of secondary
growth, estimated at an increase of 1.6% additional households in northwest Vermont
(above table). The relationship between a 1.6% growth in households associated with a
6% travel time savings, is a ratio of 1.6%:6% relationship (new households to travel time
savings). This is ratio new households to travel time is 26% (1.6 divided by 6), which is
slightly more than 5-21% increase in VMT associated with new residents noted in the
above research.9 Since traffic volume is more responsive (individuals can quickly shift
travel modes or the time they travel) than land use, this response is reasonable given
the estimated change in travel time associated with these improvements.
Therefore, the slight amount (2.5% additional) of estimated secondary growth of 132
households in key locations within northwestern Vermont by 2035 appears to be
reasonable.
Scenario 3: Exit 12B—Significant Commercial and Residential Proximate to Project, Modest Residential (Regionally)
Scenario 3 considers the effects of a new interchange at the existing VT 116 overpass.
The Delphi panel identified that the Exit 12B interchange would significantly affect
secondary growth in the area immediately surrounding the new interchange and
modestly affect residential growth in the nearby region.
The interchange was the focus of a 2010 scoping study that analyzed several
interchange configurations and future traffic operations. Since that time, it has been
included in a handful of other studies and evaluations. The most recent of these is the
VT 116/Kimball Avenue/Tilley Drive Land use & Transportation Plan. This study, referred
to here as the Tilley Drive study10 included Tilley Drive and the areas adjacent to the
potential interchange on the south side of I-89. The study included a build out estimation
developed through consultation with area property owners and the City. The commercial
and residential build out tables from that investigation are shown in Table 4 and Table 5,
respectively.
In both cases, the one-third build out scenarios are similar to the I-89 CCRPC MTP
forecast numbers for 2050. This suggests that these zones are forecast to achieve one-
third of their “build-out” potential by 2050 in the absence of significant changes in the
forecasts’ assumptions. If Exit 12B were to be built, this would result in a significant
9 These ratios are elasticities often used in transportation planning to communicate the degree of response one variable has onto another. For example a 10% change in gas price may reduce VMT by 1%, this is a 0.1 elasticity. This study identifies a 0.26 inelastic response of housing associated with the change in travel time. 10 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission. 2020. “VT 116/Kimball Ave/Tilley Drive Land Use &
Transportation Plan.” Available at: https://www.ccrpcvt.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Kimball-Tilley-Council-Presentation-2020-07-06.pdf.
11
change in the network and the market fundamentals of the parcels in and around the
interchange.
TABLE 4: TILLEY DRIVE STUDY—COMMERCIAL BUILD OUT (EMPLOYEES)
COMMON LAND AREA NAME 2015 BASE
STUDY BUILD OUT NUMBERS CCRPC MTP
1/3 2/3 Full Build 2035 Forecast 2050 Forecast
Meadowland PUD/Dynapower 1,306 1,642 1978 2,313 1,620 1,840
Rye 95 107 119 131 157 202
Technology Park 711 1,293 1,875 2,457 968 1,150
UVM-MC 207 395 583 771 319 398
Hill Farm 0 395 790 1,185 136 229
O’Brien Farm 17 80 143 205 107 170
Subtotals 2,336 3,911 5,487 7,062 3,307 3,989
TABLE 5: TILLEY DRIVE STUDY—RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT (HOUSEHOLDS)
COMMON LAND AREA NAME 2015 BASE
STUDY BUILD OUT NUMBERS CCRPC MTP
1/3 2/3 Full Build 2035 Forecast 2050 Forecast
Meadowland PUD/Dynapower 9 9 9 9 9 10
Rye 271 288 306 323 383 480
Technology Park 0 0 0 0 0 0
UVM-MC 6 76 146 216 27 45
Hill Farm 1 223 444 666 29 53
O’Brien Farm 214 447 681 914 329 426
Subtotals 501 1,043 1,586 2,128 777 1,014
Commercial
The Tilley Drive study evaluated the most affected properties near the Exit 12B
interchange and benchmarked the secondary growth that could be realized. Given that
by 2050 only the one-third build out is anticipated to be reached, the project team
recommends that the difference between the one-third build out and the two-third build
out (1,576) represents the amount of secondary growth associated with the construction
of the Exit 12B interchange by 2050 (roughly 45 new employees annually from 2015).
However, to remain consistent with the panel, by 2035, an estimated 900 new
employees (20 years at 45 per year) are to be added due to secondary growth, an
increase of 27% over the 2035 CCRPC forecast. The project team combined the
secondary growth of 900 employees with the existing MTP forecast growth of 971
employees. This resulted in an estimate of 1,871 new employees in this area by 2035.
The 1,871 figure represents 57% of the total forecast employee growth in South
Burlington by 2035.
12
Is this reasonable?
• Commercial land use is much more sensitive to travel time and access changes.
The project team used the regional travel demand model11 to reinforce and
quantify the Delphi panel’s input. The model compared the effects in the network
of an existing 22-minute trip from Tilley Drive to eastern edge of the county via
I-89. With Exit 12B in place, there were the following changes:
− Four (4) zones most affected with > 5 minutes of travel time savings (23–
26% savings).
− Seven (7) zones with over 4 minutes of time savings (19–26% savings).
− Sixteen (16) zones with over 2 minutes of time savings (9–26% savings).
− Thirty-four (34) zones with over 1 minute of travel time savings (5–26%
savings).
Figure 5 shows the existing travel time from Google Maps from Tilley Drive to the county
boundary on I-89 that the project team analyzed in the regional travel demand model.
FIGURE 5: 22-MINUTE TRIP FROM EXIT 12B TO CHITTENDEN COUNTY BORDER ON I-89
Source: Google Maps
11 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission. 2020. “Modeling.” Available at: https://www.ccrpcvt.org/our-work/transportation/transportation-resources/modeling/.
13
Figure 6 shows the changes in travel time with the Exit 12B interchange for specific
TAZs in the travel demand model.
FIGURE 6: CCRPC TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL—EXIT 12B TRAVEL TIME CHANGES
Source: RSG
The secondary growth of 900 new employees is an increase of 27.4% over the
forecasted growth in South Burlington (Table 6). Given the amount of travel time savings
(maxes out around 26%), this appears reasonable given the panel’s insight there is high
demand for accessible commercial land proximate to Exit 12B.
TABLE 6: SCENARIO 3 SECONDARY GROWTH—EMPLOYEES
FORECAST CHANGE BY 2035 (EMP GROWTH)
SECONDARY GROWTH (EMP)
TOTAL GROWTH (FORECAST + SECONDARY)
Growth in Employees – 900 1,871
South Burlington 3,290 27.4% 56.9%
Chittenden County 19,669 4.6% 9.5%
Vermont 28,754 3.1% 6.5%
New vs. Relocation Employment Growth
The total employment change (1,871) is 57% of the total CCRPC forecast employee
growth in South Burlington by 2035. This magnitude suggests that some of the
secondary growth (900) would be due to a shift from elsewhere in the county, with the
14
remainder being new commercial growth in Chittenden County above the county
control total.
The panel suggested that an estimate of 50% of the secondary growth is a good basis
for secondary growth that is new to the county because of the Exit 12B investment.
Therefore, the 900-employee secondary growth comprises the following:
• 450 new employees in the Exit 12B area would be relocated from elsewhere in
the county (already part of the countywide control total).
• 450 new employees in the Exit 12B area would be new jobs in the county adding
to the countywide control total.
Residential
Localized Residential Effects
The panel indicated that there would be a significant amount of residential secondary
growth in the area immediately proximate to the Exit 12B interchange. The increase
would occur in the areas planned for residential growth with the assumption that if the
interchange were to go in, allowable densities would increase to accommodate market
demand for additional housing.
The residential build out analysis for the Exit 12B area, summarized in Table 5, shows
that the one-third Tilley Drive forecasts are similar to the 2050 CCRPC forecast. Like the
commercial growth, the difference between the one-third and two-third forecasts is an
estimate of secondary growth that would occur because of the Exit 12B interchange.
The panel agreed that the Exit 12B area is a desirable place to meet the latent demand
for residential land in the county. If housing can be constructed to meet the market (e.g.,
entry level, affordable, accessible), it would be reasonable to expect housing unit growth
above and beyond the forecast. The forecast imbalance between jobs in the county
versus housing suggests that more housing in the county would find demand.
The residential secondary growth associated with Exit 12B is the difference between the
one-third and the two-third build out estimated from the Tilley Drive study. This change is
anticipated to occur over a period of years (perhaps by 2050 with current market
conditions) in the absence of an Exit 12B investment—averaging an annual net increase
of 15 households per year. Of the total difference between the one-third and two-third
build out (543), an estimated 310 housing units of secondary growth would occur by
2035. This represents an increase of 40% over the 2035 forecast.
Is this reasonable?
The MTP forecast for the Exit 12B area includes an increase of 276 households through
2035. With the secondary growth of 310 there would be a total of 586 new households in
this area by 2035. The residential forecast and secondary growth in the Tilley Drive area
immediately proximate to the Exit 12B area would experience a 117% increase from
15
2015 levels. The 586 new households also represent 51.6% of the total forecast growth
in households in South Burlington by 2035.
TABLE 7: SCENARIO 3 SECONDARY GROWTH—PROXIMATE RESIDENTIAL
FORECAST CHANGE BY 2035 (HH GROWTH)
SECONDARY GROWTH (HH)
TOTAL GROWTH (FORECAST + SECONDARY) Growth in Households – 310 586
South Burlington 1,135 27.3% 51.6%
Chittenden
County 6,829 4.5% 8.6%
Vermont 10,000 3.1% 5.9%
Notes: HH – Household
New vs. Relocation Employment Growth
The panel indicated that the Exit 12B housing demand is intended to meet the latent
demand in the county and mitigate the jobs-to-housing imbalance. A 50/50 split is
estimated for the secondary growth in housing, with 155 household units being
reallocated from elsewhere in the county and 155 household units new to the county in
excess of the control totals.
Regional Residential Effects
The panel indicated that in addition to the commercial and residential effects
immediately proximate to the Exit 12B interchange, there would be a modest amount of
increased residential growth in the region affected by the increased access that the
interchange provides.
The degree of change at the regional level is based on the amount of secondary growth
proximate to the interchange, which is estimated to be 310 new household units in
excess of the forecasts.
The project team selected the high end of the modest range based on an estimate of
what degree of growth is reasonable. At 20% of 155 (the new secondary growth in
excess of the county control totals), there would be approximately 31 new households
added to the control totals and forecasts for TAZs, which would benefit from improved
access to the interstate at Exit 12B, excluding those already receiving growth in the
earlier analysis.
The panel suggested that this growth would be entirely new to the county. The 31 new
households will need to be allocated to the specific TAZs based on the amount of travel
time savings as a measure for attractiveness. They aggregate to municipality as shown
in Table 8.
16
TABLE 8: ADDITIONAL HOUSEHOLDS, BY MUNICIPALITY
MUNICIPALITY ADDITIONAL HH BY 2035
South Burlington 11
Shelburne 9
Williston 7
Other 4
It may seem improbable that there was not more growth in communities south of the Exit
12B project area. The change in travel time based on modeled travel times to a point on
I-89 with and without Exit 12B in place12 was used to inform the relative attractiveness
that specific TAZs have within the county. It was determined that outside of the
immediate area surrounding Exit 12B there were a handful of TAZs in South Burlington,
Shelburne, and Williston that are most affected by the Exit 12B interchange. A handful of
other TAZs spread around St. George, Hinesburg, and Charlotte comprise the remaining
zones.
Scenario 3 Summary
Commercial Growth (2020-2035)
• Secondary growth: 900 new employees to the study area.
• 450 new employees into the county.
• 450 employees reallocated from growth anticipated elsewhere in the county.
Residential Growth: Proximate (2020-2035)
• Secondary growth: 310 new household units.
• 155 household growth to occur at Exit 12B from growth anticipated to have
occurred elsewhere in county.
• 155 household growth to occur at Exit 12B that is new to the county.
Residential Growth: Regional (2020-2035)
• 31 household growth that is new to the county.
Expansion to 2050
The second task in the development of the secondary land use is the extension of the
growth estimated by 2035 out to the future planning year of 2050. The initial three
secondary growth scenarios to 2035 are developed by changing the baseline forecasts
developed in the ECOS MTP. The expansion to 2050 follows the same logic by using
the baseline forecasts that were established for 2035 to 2050 and then applying the
12 The analysis run by RSG for the purposes of the Delphi panel and the secondary growth analysis. This analysis is shown in Figure 6.
17
same percentage changes. The details for each scenario are described below in each
section. The total secondary growth between today and 2050 is the sum of the changes
between 2020 and 2035 plus the changes between 2035 and 2050.
The summary of the secondary growth between 2035 and 2050 for the three
improvement scenarios is shown in Table 9.
TABLE 9: SECONDARY LAND USE 2035 – 2050 —SUMMARY OF RESULTS
SECONDARY GROWTH SCENARIO
NEW RESIDENTIAL (HH)
REALLOCATED RESIDENTIAL (HH)
NEW COMMERCIAL (EMP)
REALLOCATED COMMERCIAL (EMP)
1) Exit 14 U Mall. Modest commercial growth in and around U Mall. – – 75 75
2) Exit 13, 14, Widening btwn. Exits 14 and 15. Slight residential growth north and in downtown.
107 – – –
Franklin County growth 33 – – –
3) Exit 12B. Significant commercial and residential proximate to project, modest regional growth in residential.
139 116 338 337
Notes: HH – Household EMP - Employees U Mall – University Mall
Scenario 1: Exit 14 University Mall5
The secondary land use associated with the relocation of the northbound off-ramp
routing through the University Mall property is estimated to result in additional
employment surrounding the improvement.
The secondary land use growth between 2035 and 2050 is estimated by using the 20%
modest change in employment identified by the panel. The base forecast in the MTP for
the TAZs of interest (see Figure 2) has a change of 750 additional employees. The
secondary growth is estimated to be 150 new employees in these TAZs, with 75 being
new to the county and 75 being relocated from other TAZs in the county.
Scenario 2: Exit 13, 14, Widening between Exit 14 and Exit 15—Slight
Residential Growth North and in Downtown Burlington
The secondary land use associated with the capacity increases and reconfigurations of
Exit 13 and Exit 14 and any widening of the I-89 mainline between Exit 14 and Exit 15 is
expected to increase demand for regional residential growth and in downtown
Burlington.
18
The secondary land use growth between 2035 and 2050 is estimated by using the 2.5%
slight change in residential dwellings identified by the panel. The same logic used to
develop the secondary growth between 2020-2035 is used to estimate the secondary
growth between 2035 and 2050.
The results are summarized in Table 10.
TABLE 10: SCENARIO 2 HOUSEHOLD GROWTH – 2035 TO 2050
SCENARIO 2 FORECAST GROWTH (2035–2050) 2.5%
Central
Burlington 1,625 41
South Burlington 1,276 32
Net Increase 2,901 73
% of Anticipated Chittenden
County Growth (7,166) – 1.0%
Points North Colchester 903 23 Milton 486 12
Net Increase 1,389 35
% of Anticipated County Growth (7,166) – 0.48%
Total county growth – 107
% of Anticipated Chittenden
County Growth (7,166) – 1.50%
Franklin County
Net Increase 1,32213 33 All Areas
Net Increase 140
The base forecast in the MTP for the area of interest in scenario 2 is expected to
increase by 4,290 households in Chittenden County and 1,322 in Franklin County.
Applying the 2.5% increase in households across these areas results in an increase of
140 households total, with 107 in Chittenden County and 33 in Franklin County.
Scenario 3: Exit 12B—Significant Commercial and Residential Proximate to
Project, Modest Residential (Regionally)
The secondary growth by 2050 associated with the new interchange uses the previous
detailed analysis that comprised the VT 116/Kimball Avenue/Tilley Drive Land Use &
Transportation Plan. This plan informed the secondary growth by 2035 by estimating
what portion of the build out of the adjacent area is likely by 2035.
The build out analysis of the area adjacent to the interchange indicated that a 1/3 build
out aligned with the baseline 2050 forecasts included in the ECOS MTP. The degree of
13 Household change by 2050 estimated by multiplying the average change in households in the Central region (3%) and the Points North (12%) by the change forecast by 2035.
19
change in the area identified by the Delphi panel aligned well with the difference
between the 2/3 build out and the 1/3 build out. The total amount of secondary growth in
the area proximate to the Exit 12B area by 2050 is the total change between those two
build outs - 1,575 employees and 542 households. The build out numbers are shown in
Table 4 and Table 5 above.
The secondary growth expected between 2035 and 2050 is the total change minus what
is expected by 2035.
TABLE 11: SCENARIO 3 SECONDARY GROWTH BY 2050
TOTAL (2020-2050) 2020-2035 2035-2050
Employees 1,575 900 675
Households 542 310 232
The secondary growth in employment and households between 2035 and 2050 is
expected to be comprised of 50% growth new to the county and 50% taken from growth
that was assumed elsewhere in the county.
An additional 23 households are also expected to be associated with secondary growth
impacts of the new interchange slightly further away from the immediate project area.
The number of households (23) is estimated to be a 20% increase of the 116 new
households moving into the county (50% of the 232 households).
Summary of scenario 3 Secondary Growth between 2035 and 2050:
Commercial Growth (2035-2050)
• Secondary growth: 675 new employees to the study area.
• 338 new employees into the county.
• 337 employees reallocated from growth anticipated elsewhere in the county.
Residential Growth: Proximate (2035-2050)
• Secondary growth: 232 new household units.
• 116 household growth to occur at Exit 12B from growth anticipated to have
occurred elsewhere in county.
• 116 household growth to occur at Exit 12B that is new to the county.
Residential Growth: Regional (2035-2050)
• 23 household growth that is new to the county.
20
Land Use Allocation Process of the Secondary Growth
The secondary growth between 2020 and 2050 is allocated to the TAZs within the
regional model using a process akin to the original allocation of land use used to develop
the baseline future forecasts in the ECOS MTP.
Each of the three secondary land use growth scenarios is assessed individually and are
mutually exclusive.
Scenario 1: Exit 14 University Mall
The secondary growth in scenario 1 is focused within the TAZs immediately proximate to
the University Mall Exit 14 off-ramp. Because some of that growth is comprised from
relocated growth there is a countywide analysis that subtracts half of the growth in the
focused area from other growth in the county.
The removed employment growth throughout the county is based on the relative
employment attractiveness. A total of 55 TAZs across the county sent some of the
expected growth to the scenario 1 study area, with an average value of -.15 and the
maximum of -3.95 employees in any one zone. The land use analysis uses fractional
units throughout the development of the model inputs until a rounding to integers is done
at the end, just before using in the model. Figure 7 shows the countywide relocation,
with very minor negative values spread around and more significant positive values in
the University Mall study area.
21
FIGURE 7: 2050 SCENARIO 1 – RELOCATED EMPLOYMENT COMPARED TO 2050 BASE
Source: RSG
22
The total increase in employment in the area proximate to the new ramp is allocated in
proportion using both the absolute number of employees and the percent change the
TAZ experiences over the time periods. This is demonstrated in Table 12 for the
secondary growth between 2035 and 2050.
TABLE 12: ALLOCATION OF SECONDARY GROWTH (2035-2050)
TAZ FORECAST 2035 FORECAST 2050 CHANGE % CHANGE WEIGHT BY GROWTH
WEIGHT BY FUTURE SIZE
% CHANGE: WEIGHTING (75% GROWTH AND 25% SIZE)
TOTAL INCREASE (2035-2050)
707 404 405 1 0.25% 0.13% 7% 2% 2.9
708 1,470 1,643 173 11.77% 6.20% 30% 12% 18.1
722 480 543 63 13.13% 6.91% 10% 8% 11.4 723 115 128 13 11.30% 5.95% 2% 5% 7.6 724 239 270 31 12.97% 6.83% 5% 6% 9.5
725 542 581 39 7.20% 3.79% 10% 5% 8.2 726 116 132 16 13.79% 7.26% 2% 6% 9.1 727 703 860 157 22.33% 11.76% 15% 13% 19.0
734 18 22 4 22.22% 11.70% 0% 9% 13.3
736 328 548 220 67.07% 35.32% 10% 29% 43.4
737 393 424 31 7.89% 4.15% 8% 5% 7.5 Total 150
Scenario 2: Exit 13, 14, Widening between Exit 14 and Exit 15—Slight
Residential Growth North and in Downtown Burlington
Scenario 2 secondary growth only involves new residential growth above and beyond
the regional control totals. This requires only a consideration as to which TAZs are
eligible to receive that growth and then how to allocate it to those TAZs. The ECOS plan
identifies areas that are intended to meet 90% of the region’s growth. Only these TAZs
identified for this growth are used to receive the additional households identified in
scenario 2. In the end, 74 TAZs met the criteria, which included being identified for
growth and within the communities of Burlington, Colchester, Milton, South Burlington,
and Winooski.
The average TAZ received 1.4 households with no TAZ receiving more than 8.9
households. The distribution of the households is shown in Figure 8.
23
FIGURE 8: 2050 SCENARIO 2 – ADDITIONAL HOUSEHOLDS COMPARED TO 2050 BASE
Source: RSG
24
Scenario 3: Exit 12B—Significant Commercial and Residential Proximate to
Project, Modest Residential (Regionally)
The allocation of the secondary growth associated with the Exit 12B interchange is more
complex involving several steps. These include accounting for relocated households and
employment, new households and employment, and new household growth regionally.
The change in PM peak hour travel times associated with the Exit 12B interchange is
used in conjunction with the original land use allocation process used in the ECOS MTP.
The travel times account for how the interchange changes travel time to the
southeastern county boundary along I-89. Several origins and destinations were
reviewed during the secondary growth investigation and the I-89 project team
determined this destination had the most significant changes due to the interchange at
Exit 12B.
The land use allocation process used in the ECOS MTP considered the percent of the
TAZ developed and the amount of development that could be possible (considering
zoning, resource constraints, and other limitations imposed by the local government).
The relocation process used the travel time and previous allocation process to develop
an overall value for how ‘attractive’ the TAZs is (or isn’t) for household or employment
growth.
Areas least attractive to growth are the TAZs sending the most growth that will be
relocated to the area surrounding Exit 12B, while those most attractive will be the ones
receiving the relocated land uses. The households removed or added to a zone use the
overall attractiveness value of the TAZ relative to all other TAZs in the county (through
normalization) to guide how much is removed or added to any specific TAZ.
Households
The relocated households to the Exit 12B area were removed from 217 TAZs in the
county and added to 86 TAZs. The new regional households that are further away from
Exit 12B investment are added to 40 TAZs.
The secondary growth in households by 2050 is summarized in Table 13.
TABLE 13: SECONDARY GROWTH IN HOUSEHOLDS
RELOCATED
HOUSEHOLDS
NEW PROXIMATE
HOUSEHOLDS
NEW REGIONAL
HOUSEHOLDS
2020-2035 155 155 31
2035-2050 116 116 23
Total 271 271 54
25
Figure 9 shows the total change between scenario 3 secondary growth and the 2050
base forecast.
FIGURE 9: 2050 SCENARIO 3 – HOUSEHOLDS COMPARED TO 2050 BASE
Source: RSG
26
Employment
The relocated employment to the Exit 12B area were removed from 194 TAZs in the
county and added to 42 TAZs.
The secondary growth in employment by 2050 is summarized in Table 14.
TABLE 14: SECONDARY GROWTH IN EMPLOYMENT
RELOCATED
EMPLOYEES
NEW PROXIMATE
EMPLOYEES
2020-2035 450 450
2035-2050 338 337
Total 788 787
Figure 10 shows the total change between the scenario 3 secondary growth and the
2050 base forecast.
27
FIGURE 10: 2050 SCENARIO 3 – EMPLOYMENT COMPARED TO 2050 BASE
Source: RSG
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21 MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd 7 Jan
GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP.
CITY COUNCIL $147,250.00 $61,793.00 41.96%$85,457.00 $7,962.00
ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE $5,285,740.81 $2,149,392.69 40.66%$3,136,348.12 $240,793.30
CITY MANAGER $525,455.17 $258,718.65 49.24%$266,736.52 $36,598.33
LEGAL/ACCOUNTING ACTUARY $332,001.08 $181,261.51 54.60%$150,739.57 $18,394.07
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $1,130,583.90 $538,836.58 47.66%$591,747.32 $121,328.41
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $273,762.52 $161,368.79 58.94%$112,393.73 $18,301.61
CITY CLERK $262,806.95 $182,030.59 69.26%$80,776.36 $20,165.45
ASSESSING/TAX/FINANCE $368,688.73 $206,863.78 56.11%$161,824.95 $21,145.44
PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW $467,083.17 $210,725.34 45.12%$256,357.83 $32,601.47
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $469,733.00 $469,733.00 100.00%$0.00 $469,733.00
Total GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP.$9,263,105.33 $4,420,723.93 47.72%$4,842,381.40 $987,023.08
PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE DEPARTMENT $3,311,856.41 $1,927,773.67 58.21%$1,384,082.74 $244,863.71
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS $1,625.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,625.00 $0.00
AMBULANCE $158,400.00 $30,408.12 19.20%$127,991.88 $5,588.86
POLICE DEPARTMENT $5,234,415.90 $2,715,432.37 51.88%$2,518,983.53 $351,428.71
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $771,000.00 $764,583.82 99.17%$6,416.18 -$261.48
Total PUBLIC SAFETY $9,477,297.31 $5,438,197.98 57.38%$4,039,099.33 $601,619.80
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $3,391,697.77 $1,253,808.46 36.97%$2,137,889.31 $80,963.01
CULTURE AND RECREATION
RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $361,900.39 $164,816.05 45.54%$197,084.34 $23,224.36
PROGRAMS $21,000.00 $1,623.35 7.73%$19,376.65 $245.09
RED ROCKS PARK $8,850.00 $249.55 2.82%$8,600.45 $84.19
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21 MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd 7 Jan
FACILITIES $243,700.00 $55,168.32 22.64%$188,531.68 $1,017.72
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $129,600.00 $36,245.73 27.97%$93,354.27 $2,714.35
PUBLIC LIBRARY $617,899.04 $255,070.56 41.28%$362,828.48 $40,605.72
CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE $383,365.74 $156,498.43 40.82%$226,867.31 $21,382.69
Total CULTURE AND RECREATION $1,793,815.17 $670,223.73 37.36%$1,123,591.44 $89,363.40
OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES $749,987.00 $571,458.84 76.20%$178,528.16 $0.00
CURRENT PRINCIPAL BONDS $1,104,983.30 $723,589.00 65.48%$381,394.30 $0.00
CURRENT INTEREST BONDS $512,335.00 $117,458.20 22.93%$394,876.80 $0.00
Total GENERAL FUND $26,293,220.88 $13,195,460.14 50.19%$13,097,760.74 $1,758,969.29
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP.
CITY COUNCIL
General Expenses $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,500.00 $0.00
Housing Trust $50,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$50,000.00 $0.00
Designated Reserve $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00
Advertising $3,000.00 $75.00 2.50%$2,925.00 $0.00
G.B.I.C.$5,000.00 $5,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
V.L.C.T.$23,000.00 $23,440.00 101.91%-$440.00 $0.00
Chamber of Commerce $3,600.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,600.00 $0.00
Social Services $15,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$15,000.00 $0.00
CCTV-Clickable Meetings $21,000.00 $20,000.00 95.24%$1,000.00 $0.00
Councilors $7,750.00 $7,750.00 100.00%$0.00 $7,750.00
Liquor Control $500.00 $500.00 100.00%$0.00 $500.00
Front Porch Forum $4,900.00 $5,028.00 102.61%-$128.00 $0.00
Total CITY COUNCIL $147,250.00 $61,793.00 41.96%$85,457.00 $7,962.00
ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE
Salaries $112,282.00 $36,842.80 32.81%$75,439.20 $4,931.20
Payment to Sickbank Fund $125,000.00 $125,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
EAP Services $6,000.00 $2,000.00 33.33%$4,000.00 $0.00
Wellness/Fitness $13,400.00 $0.00 0.00%$13,400.00 $0.00
Fringe Benefits $8,500.00 $8,984.23 105.70%-$484.23 $850.84
FICA/Medicare $8,589.57 $2,752.28 32.04%$5,837.29 $393.20
Vision Plan $12,764.16 $3,225.66 25.27%$9,538.50 $1,035.14
Short Term Disability Pla $26,718.80 $15,046.98 56.32%$11,671.82 $2,164.54
Disability Insurance $28,048.68 $15,378.87 54.83%$12,669.81 $2,190.36
Group Health Insurance $2,417,319.00 $901,908.86 37.31%$1,515,410.14 $10,546.08
Bank - Benefits $8,000.00 $7,268.37 90.85%$731.63 $0.00
Group Life Insurance $37,604.70 $25,000.27 66.48%$12,604.43 $3,651.16
Group Dental Insurance $129,067.92 $62,140.15 48.15%$66,927.77 $11,129.41
Pension $1,418,474.99 $169,502.01 11.95%$1,248,972.98 $95,783.07
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
ICMA Match $208,470.99 $109,045.56 52.31%$99,425.43 $15,008.00
Advertising $1,000.00 $981.00 98.10%$19.00 $0.00
Dues and Subscriptions $1,000.00 $119.88 11.99%$880.12 $0.00
Workers Comp Insurance $361,000.00 $205,430.94 56.91%$155,569.06 $0.00
Property Insurance $268,000.00 $131,067.51 48.91%$136,932.49 $238.00
Bonding Insurance-Officer $6,100.00 $6,030.00 98.85%$70.00 $6,030.00
VLCT Unemployment Insuran $13,000.00 $5,785.00 44.50%$7,215.00 $0.00
Deductibles/Coinsurance $10,000.00 -$4,154.46 -41.54%$14,154.46 $0.00
Health Ctr-Lease&Services $0.00 $298,443.64 100.00%-$298,443.64 $83,298.80
Hiring-required testing $1,200.00 $1,423.10 118.59%-$223.10 $1,000.45
Payroll Services $32,000.00 $16,973.45 53.04%$15,026.55 $2,543.05
Contractual Services $28,200.00 $196.59 0.70%$28,003.41 $0.00
Travel and Training $4,000.00 $3,000.00 75.00%$1,000.00 $0.00
Total ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE $5,285,740.81 $2,149,392.69 40.66%$3,136,348.12 $240,793.30
CITY MANAGER
City Mgr.Salaries-Perm.$377,414.00 $222,883.05 59.06%$154,530.95 $25,162.40
Leave Time Turn-In $10,269.00 $8,205.60 79.91%$2,063.40 $8,205.60
FICA/Medicare $28,872.17 $15,963.32 55.29%$12,908.85 $2,610.04
Office Supplies $3,500.00 $1,081.76 30.91%$2,418.24 $216.77
Advertising $11,000.00 $1,616.00 14.69%$9,384.00 $424.00
Telephone $3,600.00 $1,993.44 55.37%$1,606.56 $341.38
Postage $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,000.00 $0.00
Dues and Subscriptions $3,700.00 $3,193.94 86.32%$506.06 $29.00
Printing $3,100.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,100.00 $0.00
Consulting Fees $60,000.00 $1,201.42 2.00%$58,798.58 $0.00
Travel & Training $8,000.00 $2,580.12 32.25%$5,419.88 $0.00
Training $14,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$14,000.00 $0.00
Total CITY MANAGER $525,455.17 $258,718.65 49.24%$266,736.52 $36,598.33
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
LEGAL/ACCOUNTING ACTUARY
FICA/Medicare $13,509.27 $7,254.00 53.70%$6,255.27 $7,254.00
Dues and Subscriptions $5,400.00 $3,643.22 67.47%$1,756.78 $586.51
Appeals/Abatements $6,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$6,000.00 $0.00
Gen Govt. Actuaries/Pensi $24,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$24,000.00 $0.00
Gen Govt. Audit/Accountin $28,000.00 $25,750.00 91.96%$2,250.00 $2,000.00
Legal/Labor/Suits $75,000.00 $34,661.61 46.22%$40,338.39 $180.00
Legal Costs $176,591.81 $109,952.68 62.26%$66,639.13 $8,373.56
Professional Development $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,500.00 $0.00
Total LEGAL/ACCOUNTING ACTUARY $332,001.08 $181,261.51 54.60%$150,739.57 $18,394.07
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Salaries $263,199.16 $161,719.21 61.44%$101,479.95 $20,251.20
FICA/Medicare $20,134.74 $14,185.32 70.45%$5,949.42 $2,230.66
Muni Bld Cleaning Supplie $1,000.00 $379.47 37.95%$620.53 $0.00
Vehicle - Maintenance $1,700.00 $572.51 33.68%$1,127.49 $69.25
Office Equipment Fees $10,000.00 $5,270.05 52.70%$4,729.95 $1,782.83
Branding and Outreach $25,000.00 $14,574.92 58.30%$10,425.08 $0.00
Digital Media $19,000.00 $10,681.50 56.22%$8,318.50 $0.00
Muni Bld Cleaning Service $30,300.00 $12,128.97 40.03%$18,171.03 $858.94
City Hall Maintenance $20,000.00 $5,683.96 28.42%$14,316.04 $0.00
Contingency Fund-Infrastr $140,000.00 $16,133.41 11.52%$123,866.59 $0.00
Energy Efficiency $40,000.00 $5,830.00 14.58%$34,170.00 $5,830.00
HVAC Maintenance $2,400.00 $916.09 38.17%$1,483.91 $0.00
Positive Pay Fee $850.00 $250.08 29.42%$599.92 $0.00
Archives and Digitalizati $25,000.00 $23,457.65 93.83%$1,542.35 $0.00
Electricity-City Hall $30,000.00 $19,310.86 64.37%$10,689.14 $4,577.26
Utilities-City Hall $17,000.00 $3,874.67 22.79%$13,125.33 $1,568.20
Street Lights $144,000.00 $72,138.03 50.10%$71,861.97 $12,762.73
Stormwater User Rent $321,000.00 $164,355.12 51.20%$156,644.88 $75,529.44
Generator Prevent Maint.$1,000.00 $276.59 27.66%$723.41 $0.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Council/Board Secretary $14,000.00 $7,098.17 50.70%$6,901.83 -$4,132.10
Public Art $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$5,000.00 $0.00
Total ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $1,130,583.90 $538,836.58 47.66%$591,747.32 $121,328.41
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
IT Staff $147,201.60 $99,395.85 67.52%$47,805.75 $13,549.40
IT-Overtime $29,700.00 $8,023.86 27.02%$21,676.14 $0.00
FICA/Medicare $11,260.92 $8,662.76 76.93%$2,598.16 $530.85
Computer Software $35,000.00 $16,062.12 45.89%$18,937.88 $1,374.65
IT Utility Services $16,600.00 $6,503.30 39.18%$10,096.70 $939.77
Computer Hardware $29,000.00 $20,669.65 71.27%$8,330.35 $1,224.44
IT Service $5,000.00 $2,051.25 41.03%$2,948.75 $682.50
Total INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $273,762.52 $161,368.79 58.94%$112,393.73 $18,301.61
CITY CLERK
City Clerk Salaries-Perm.$199,820.67 $142,672.58 71.40%$57,148.09 $15,143.02
Overtime $300.00 $82.43 27.48%$217.57 $0.00
FICA/Medicare $15,286.28 $12,637.49 82.67%$2,648.79 $1,174.11
General Supplies $2,500.00 $1,200.09 48.00%$1,299.91 $216.66
Animal Control $5,200.00 $1,050.22 20.20%$4,149.78 $0.00
Election Expenses $12,000.00 $4,281.90 35.68%$7,718.10 $109.50
School Election Expenses $1,500.00 $3,289.50 219.30%-$1,789.50 $0.00
Election Supplies $0.00 $8,258.11 100.00%-$8,258.11 $3,320.51
Telephone $400.00 $101.64 25.41%$298.36 $16.45
Postage $2,250.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,250.00 $0.00
Dues and Subscriptions $400.00 $360.00 90.00%$40.00 $35.00
Printing $350.00 $275.66 78.76%$74.34 $0.00
Board of Civil Authority $7,400.00 $2,191.12 29.61%$5,208.88 $0.00
Election Workers $7,100.00 $4,006.92 56.44%$3,093.08 $0.00
BCA Appeals/Abatements $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Office Equip Maintenance $2,100.00 $586.47 27.93%$1,513.53 $20.00
Travel & Training $4,200.00 $162.26 3.86%$4,037.74 $0.00
Photocopier Lease Prin $1,500.00 $874.20 58.28%$625.80 $130.20
Total CITY CLERK $262,806.95 $182,030.59 69.26%$80,776.36 $20,165.45
ASSESSING/TAX/FINANCE
Assessing/Tax Sal.-Perm.$321,633.75 $171,078.60 53.19%$150,555.15 $19,268.28
Overtime $800.00 $0.00 0.00%$800.00 $0.00
FICA/Medicare $24,604.98 $14,010.91 56.94%$10,594.07 $1,585.49
Office Supplies $2,000.00 $1,092.68 54.63%$907.32 $40.00
Tax Sales Advertising $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00
Telephone $250.00 $133.91 53.56%$116.09 $21.67
Postage $6,000.00 $6,010.94 100.18%-$10.94 $0.00
Dues and Memberships $800.00 $250.00 31.25%$550.00 $230.00
Printing $3,000.00 $6,516.74 217.22%-$3,516.74 $0.00
NEMRC/APEX $5,100.00 $6,595.00 129.31%-$1,495.00 $0.00
Travel & Training $4,000.00 $1,175.00 29.38%$2,825.00 $0.00
Total ASSESSING/TAX/FINANCE $368,688.73 $206,863.78 56.11%$161,824.95 $21,145.44
PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW
Planning Salaries-Perm.$339,603.50 $171,593.11 50.53%$168,010.39 $20,490.70
Overtime $6,300.00 $253.23 4.02%$6,046.77 $0.00
FICA/Medicare $25,979.67 $13,746.97 52.91%$12,232.70 $1,645.64
Office Supplies $2,700.00 $1,128.94 41.81%$1,571.06 $124.27
Public Meeting Advertisin $3,500.00 $1,922.40 54.93%$1,577.60 $475.20
Telephone $150.00 $70.99 47.33%$79.01 $11.49
Postage $800.00 $0.00 0.00%$800.00 $0.00
Dues and Subscriptions $1,650.00 $891.70 54.04%$758.30 $0.00
Document Printing $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Consultants $55,000.00 $11,016.65 20.03%$43,983.35 $1,100.00
Committee Support $2,900.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,900.00 $0.00
Payment for GIS Services $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,500.00 $0.00
PC/DRB Stipends $9,000.00 $8,754.17 97.27%$245.83 $8,754.17
Travel & Training $5,500.00 $1,347.18 24.49%$4,152.82 $0.00
Special Projects $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00
Total PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW $467,083.17 $210,725.34 45.12%$256,357.83 $32,601.47
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
Ambulance Department $155,000.00 $155,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $155,000.00
Fuel Pump Reserve Fund $8,200.00 $8,200.00 100.00%$0.00 $8,200.00
Open Space Reserve Fund $306,533.00 $306,533.00 100.00%$0.00 $306,533.00
Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $469,733.00 $469,733.00 100.00%$0.00 $469,733.00
Total GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP.$9,263,105.33 $4,420,723.93 47.72%$4,842,381.40 $987,023.08
PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Salaries-Permanent $2,010,155.14 $1,246,853.46 62.03%$763,301.68 $166,904.77
Fire Salaries-EMT $82,000.00 $54,385.59 66.32%$27,614.41 $7,169.08
Holiday Pay $335,100.00 $265,368.99 79.19%$69,731.01 $32,147.80
Fair Labor Standard O/T $141,804.00 $0.00 0.00%$141,804.00 $0.00
F/D Overtime - Fill-In $138,000.00 $74,630.67 54.08%$63,369.33 $8,831.47
F/D Overtime - Training $30,000.00 $8,380.97 27.94%$21,619.03 $1,361.81
F/D Overtime - Emerg Call $6,500.00 $8,457.45 130.11%-$1,957.45 $737.71
Wellness/Fitness $25,000.00 $11,049.98 44.20%$13,950.02 $708.33
Fire-Off Duty Outside Emp $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00
New Employee Training $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00
Fringe Benefits $700.00 $615.00 87.86%$85.00 $615.00
FICA/Medicare $210,647.27 $130,127.95 61.78%$80,519.32 $16,501.47
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Office Supplies $2,000.00 $989.38 49.47%$1,010.62 $121.27
Vaccinations-HEP $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00
REHAB Supplies $300.00 $17.94 5.98%$282.06 $0.00
Station Operating Supply $2,000.00 $307.95 15.40%$1,692.05 $164.97
Maintenance Tools $475.00 $0.00 0.00%$475.00 $0.00
Uniforms-Career $28,000.00 $2,884.22 10.30%$25,115.78 $1,827.27
Firefighting Clothing $20,000.00 $1,367.22 6.84%$18,632.78 $0.00
Vehicle Tools $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00
Gas Chief's vehicle & rei $2,800.00 $899.30 32.12%$1,900.70 $130.50
Diesel Fuel $19,000.00 $7,422.34 39.06%$11,577.66 $1,583.89
Oil $600.00 $260.43 43.41%$339.57 $61.20
Films and Books $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00
Fire Prevention Materials $1,500.00 $140.34 9.36%$1,359.66 $140.34
Fire Extinguishers $775.00 $93.00 12.00%$682.00 $0.00
Airpacks Maintenance $7,000.00 $3,777.52 53.96%$3,222.48 $0.00
Telephone $10,500.00 $5,648.76 53.80%$4,851.24 $1,011.45
Postage-Tool Shipping $200.00 $9.99 5.00%$190.01 $0.00
Dues and Subscriptions $1,500.00 $2,322.00 154.80%-$822.00 $475.00
Contractural Services $4,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$4,500.00 $0.00
Fire Station Maintenance $25,000.00 $10,687.13 42.75%$14,312.87 $1,084.26
Laundry and Bedding $5,000.00 $149.98 3.00%$4,850.02 $0.00
Radio Repair $2,500.00 $1,426.93 57.08%$1,073.07 $0.00
Vehicle Maintenance $38,000.00 $21,935.27 57.72%$16,064.73 $1,592.45
Vehicle Repair $30,000.00 $22,027.70 73.43%$7,972.30 $0.00
Equipment R & M $25,000.00 $2,243.93 8.98%$22,756.07 $165.72
Truck Tires $6,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$6,500.00 $0.00
Computers Contract ACS $7,000.00 $3,257.01 46.53%$3,742.99 $20.00
Public Safety Equipment $3,600.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,600.00 $0.00
Conferences $1,000.00 -$335.00 -33.50%$1,335.00 $0.00
Training Schools $6,500.00 $1,499.95 23.08%$5,000.05 $79.95
Training Equipment $1,200.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,200.00 $0.00
Recruiting & Testing $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,000.00 $0.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Fire Station #2 Heat/Elec $20,000.00 $8,513.44 42.57%$11,486.56 $1,428.00
Fire Safety Equipment $32,000.00 $28.48 0.09%$31,971.52 $0.00
F/D Furniture/Equipment $7,500.00 $29,250.40 390.01%-$21,750.40 $0.00
Firefighting Equipment-ho $3,000.00 $1,078.00 35.93%$1,922.00 $0.00
Capital Leases Prin $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00
Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $3,311,856.41 $1,927,773.67 58.21%$1,384,082.74 $244,863.71
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
Uniforms-Electrical Insp $625.00 $0.00 0.00%$625.00 $0.00
Dues and Subscriptions $250.00 $0.00 0.00%$250.00 $0.00
Training Schools-Electric $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00
Equipment Purchase $250.00 $0.00 0.00%$250.00 $0.00
Total ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS $1,625.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,625.00 $0.00
AMBULANCE
Office Supplies $750.00 $0.00 0.00%$750.00 $0.00
Medical Supplies-Disposab $49,000.00 $16,995.36 34.68%$32,004.64 $4,171.45
Medical Supplies-Oxygen $3,000.00 $3,049.78 101.66%-$49.78 $214.72
Medical Equipment Replace $17,500.00 $4,172.92 23.85%$13,327.08 $354.73
Uniforms-Career $7,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$7,000.00 $0.00
Diesel Fuel $6,800.00 $1,077.64 15.85%$5,722.36 $0.00
Training Films and Books $300.00 $0.00 0.00%$300.00 $0.00
Telephone $6,200.00 $3,243.08 52.31%$2,956.92 $540.09
Billing Postage $1,200.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,200.00 $0.00
Dues & Subscriptions $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00
Vehicle Maintenance $3,000.00 $271.88 9.06%$2,728.12 $271.88
Vehicle Repair $4,000.00 $35.99 0.90%$3,964.01 $35.99
Equipment R&M $3,400.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,400.00 $0.00
Office Equip Maintenance $250.00 $51.47 20.59%$198.53 $0.00
Billing Software/Upgrades $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Med Equipment Maintenance $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,000.00 $0.00
Training Programs $5,000.00 $1,510.00 30.20%$3,490.00 $0.00
Training Equipment $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00
To Reserve Fund-Training $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00
EMS Patient Care Discript $35,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$35,000.00 $0.00
Total AMBULANCE $158,400.00 $30,408.12 19.20%$127,991.88 $5,588.86
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Police Salaries-Permanent $3,385,868.00 $1,826,508.22 53.95%$1,559,359.78 $242,092.84
Police Salaries-Overtime $298,000.00 $154,749.37 51.93%$143,250.63 $11,869.70
Holiday Pay $220,000.00 $172,717.62 78.51%$47,282.38 $23,093.48
Shift Differential $48,000.00 $29,938.18 62.37%$18,061.82 $4,067.51
Off-Duty Police Salary $10,000.00 $23,130.00 231.30%-$13,130.00 $0.00
Fitness $10,000.00 $14,018.37 140.18%-$4,018.37 $0.00
FICA/Medicare $303,082.90 $168,420.23 55.57%$134,662.67 $21,346.22
Office Supplies $10,500.00 $5,402.00 51.45%$5,098.00 $790.54
Range Supplies $13,000.00 $8,926.60 68.67%$4,073.40 $0.00
Radio Equipment-Supplies $300.00 $0.00 0.00%$300.00 $0.00
Investigative Supplies $8,500.00 $2,082.54 24.50%$6,417.46 $377.30
Youth Services Supplies $5,000.00 $462.20 9.24%$4,537.80 $0.00
Traffic Unit Supplies $2,000.00 $1,205.00 60.25%$795.00 $0.00
K-9 Supplies $4,000.00 $1,700.47 42.51%$2,299.53 $376.89
Janitorial Supplies $3,200.00 $1,319.28 41.23%$1,880.72 $169.56
Uniform Supplies $38,500.00 $16,912.83 43.93%$21,587.17 $1,335.11
Tires $9,800.00 $5,164.92 52.70%$4,635.08 $0.00
Gas and Oil $55,000.00 $23,531.38 42.78%$31,468.62 $4,004.08
Community Outreach $60,365.00 $7,851.88 13.01%$52,513.12 $0.00
Telephone $30,000.00 $19,077.43 63.59%$10,922.57 $2,307.66
Postage $2,200.00 $1,065.81 48.45%$1,134.19 $35.45
Dues and Subscriptions $2,000.00 $1,065.00 53.25%$935.00 $865.00
Towing Services $1,000.00 $592.00 59.20%$408.00 $507.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Crime Prevention Supplies $2,000.00 $300.00 15.00%$1,700.00 $0.00
Building Repairs $65,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$65,000.00 $0.00
Building Maintenance $15,000.00 $245.00 1.63%$14,755.00 $245.00
3rd Floor Lease $50,600.00 $20,097.06 39.72%$30,502.94 $8,173.21
Uniform Cleaning $15,000.00 $6,546.41 43.64%$8,453.59 $1,228.15
Office Equip. Contract $6,000.00 $2,782.61 46.38%$3,217.39 $20.00
Generator Prevent Maint $1,200.00 $167.00 13.92%$1,033.00 $0.00
Radio Equip. Maintenance $2,000.00 $1,290.00 64.50%$710.00 $0.00
Vehicle Repair $55,000.00 $24,601.67 44.73%$30,398.33 $1,785.32
Computer Connections Syst $8,800.00 $5,415.00 61.53%$3,385.00 $0.00
Equipment Maintenance $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00
Records Management System $12,000.00 $10,545.00 87.88%$1,455.00 $0.00
Consulting Services $27,000.00 $11,900.40 44.08%$15,099.60 $1,902.80
Animal Control Contracts $26,000.00 $13,948.98 53.65%$12,051.02 $0.00
Conferences $6,000.00 $1,503.10 25.05%$4,496.90 $0.00
In-Service Training $32,500.00 $1,725.16 5.31%$30,774.84 -$866.00
Recruiting & Testing $4,000.00 $35.00 0.88%$3,965.00 $0.00
Tuition Reimbursement $6,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$6,000.00 $0.00
Electric-Police Dept.$60,000.00 $36,450.19 60.75%$23,549.81 $12,019.78
Heat/Hot Water $5,500.00 $799.73 14.54%$4,700.27 $244.45
Radio Installation Utilit $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00
Building Common Area Fees $65,000.00 $35,648.69 54.84%$29,351.31 $6,452.73
Cleaning/Building Service $33,000.00 $18,865.00 57.17%$14,135.00 $2,695.00
Vehicles and Equipment $126,000.00 $450.00 0.36%$125,550.00 $60.00
Vehicle Equipment $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$5,000.00 $0.00
Office Equipment $4,000.00 $1,216.86 30.42%$2,783.14 $0.00
Taser Replacement $3,500.00 $3,871.15 110.60%-$371.15 $0.00
Police Computerization $76,000.00 $31,187.03 41.04%$44,812.97 $4,229.93
Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $5,234,415.90 $2,715,432.37 51.88%$2,518,983.53 $351,428.71
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
To undesignated reserve f $21,000.00 $14,583.82 69.45%$6,416.18 -$261.48
To Capital Improvements $750,000.00 $750,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $771,000.00 $764,583.82 99.17%$6,416.18 -$261.48
Total PUBLIC SAFETY $9,477,297.31 $5,438,197.98 57.38%$4,039,099.33 $601,619.80
STREETS & HIGHWAYS
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Highway Salaries-Perm.$756,916.18 $468,131.66 61.85%$288,784.52 $4,462.26
Highway Salaries-Overtime $35,000.00 $25,251.28 72.15%$9,748.72 $14,341.31
FICA/Medicare $60,581.59 $35,784.55 59.07%$24,797.04 $1,584.66
Office Supplies $2,000.00 $1,318.15 65.91%$681.85 $89.63
Traffic Light Supplies $28,000.00 $4,975.84 17.77%$23,024.16 $17.46
Sign Supplies $7,500.00 $5,927.11 79.03%$1,572.89 $165.65
City Highways Material $37,500.00 $11,748.07 31.33%$25,751.93 $1,565.42
Road Striping $20,000.00 $8,266.13 41.33%$11,733.87 $30.00
Winter Salt $150,000.00 $50,192.53 33.46%$99,807.47 $18,289.84
Winter Sand $300.00 $0.00 0.00%$300.00 $0.00
Winter Liquid Deicer Addi $18,000.00 $6,256.25 34.76%$11,743.75 $0.00
Building Supplies $1,400.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,400.00 $0.00
Uniforms $20,000.00 $10,791.03 53.96%$9,208.97 $892.10
Vehicle Repair Parts $75,000.00 $35,001.97 46.67%$39,998.03 $4,619.20
School Bus Parts $30,000.00 $15,594.94 51.98%$14,405.06 $1,057.31
Gasoline $30,000.00 $10,739.59 35.80%$19,260.41 $3,924.14
Oil $6,500.00 $2,308.09 35.51%$4,191.91 -$171.62
Diesel Fuel $32,000.00 $9,131.42 28.54%$22,868.58 $7,917.03
Diesel/Gasoline Non City $140,000.00 $34,884.62 24.92%$105,115.38 $8,188.25
Fuel Station Maintenance $1,500.00 $749.70 49.98%$750.30 $100.00
Advertising $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00
Telephone/Internet $6,000.00 $3,235.32 53.92%$2,764.68 $483.90
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Building Maintenance $75,000.00 $13,411.18 17.88%$61,588.82 $2,028.62
HVAC Maintenance $5,000.00 $1,104.50 22.09%$3,895.50 $0.00
Generator Prevent Maint $4,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$4,500.00 $0.00
Tree Care $100,000.00 $3,802.30 3.80%$96,197.70 $455.17
Consulting Services $24,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$24,000.00 $0.00
Equipment Rental/Purchase $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00
Office Equipment Maintnce $1,500.00 $825.47 55.03%$674.53 $121.18
Travel & Training $9,000.00 $3,043.50 33.82%$5,956.50 $680.50
Utilities - Garage $18,000.00 $8,186.68 45.48%$9,813.32 $1,146.93
Utilities-Garage Heat $13,000.00 $2,787.24 21.44%$10,212.76 $1,514.86
Traffic Lights $20,000.00 $9,812.53 49.06%$10,187.47 $1,919.95
Vehicle Replacement $250,000.00 $12,033.00 4.81%$237,967.00 $0.00
Highway Paving $750,000.00 $445,104.10 59.35%$304,895.90 $0.00
Curbs and Sidewalks $2,500.00 $251.00 10.04%$2,249.00 $0.00
Facilities Stewardship $50,000.00 $6,457.84 12.92%$43,542.16 $0.00
Spc Prjcts/C Beautifictn $600,000.00 $6,700.87 1.12%$593,299.13 $5,539.26
Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $3,391,697.77 $1,253,808.46 36.97%$2,137,889.31 $80,963.01
CULTURE AND RECREATION
RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
Rec.Admin.Salaries-Perm.$271,760.70 $144,064.61 53.01%$127,696.09 $21,197.26
Leave Time Turn-In $7,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$7,000.00 $0.00
Overtime $1,500.00 $1,137.53 75.84%$362.47 $99.88
FICA/Medicare $20,789.69 $11,057.44 53.19%$9,732.25 $1,646.03
Office Supplies $3,000.00 $572.67 19.09%$2,427.33 $149.79
Clothing $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00
Telephone $1,500.00 $513.50 34.23%$986.50 $79.40
Postage $150.00 $0.00 0.00%$150.00 $0.00
Dues and Subscriptions $1,700.00 $576.00 33.88%$1,124.00 $32.00
Scholarships $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00
Printing $36,000.00 $5,022.94 13.95%$30,977.06 $0.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Software/Printer Contract $4,600.00 $91.49 1.99%$4,508.51 $20.00
Travel & Training $6,900.00 $1,571.00 22.77%$5,329.00 $0.00
Lease Printer and Copier $5,000.00 $208.87 4.18%$4,791.13 $0.00
Total RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $361,900.39 $164,816.05 45.54%$197,084.34 $23,224.36
PROGRAMS
General Supplies $11,000.00 $1,623.35 14.76%$9,376.65 $245.09
Advertising $7,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$7,000.00 $0.00
School Use $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00
Total PROGRAMS $21,000.00 $1,623.35 7.73%$19,376.65 $245.09
RED ROCKS PARK
Red Rocks Park Salaries $6,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$6,500.00 $0.00
General Supplies $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00
Clothing $200.00 $0.00 0.00%$200.00 $0.00
Telephone $250.00 $0.00 0.00%$250.00 $0.00
Utilities $400.00 $249.55 62.39%$150.45 $84.19
Total RED ROCKS PARK $8,850.00 $249.55 2.82%$8,600.45 $84.19
FACILITIES
Park Salaries $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00
Supplies $9,500.00 $210.00 2.21%$9,290.00 $0.00
Vehicle Maintenance $3,500.00 $490.49 14.01%$3,009.51 $58.58
Fuel-Gas $1,500.00 $483.96 32.26%$1,016.04 $170.86
Facilities Maintenance $2,500.00 $360.00 14.40%$2,140.00 $0.00
Port-O-Lets $7,000.00 $310.00 4.43%$6,690.00 $0.00
Electric-Jaycee Park $1,600.00 $620.81 38.80%$979.19 $209.46
Electric-Dorset Park $2,500.00 $1,149.48 45.98%$1,350.52 $237.08
Electric-Overlook Park $300.00 $383.24 127.75%-$83.24 $291.32
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Electric-Tennis Courts $300.00 $154.14 51.38%$145.86 $50.42
Facilities Improvements $32,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$32,000.00 $0.00
Capital Items $180,000.00 $51,006.20 28.34%$128,993.80 $0.00
Total FACILITIES $243,700.00 $55,168.32 22.64%$188,531.68 $1,017.72
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Adult Programs $18,000.00 -$225.00 -1.25%$18,225.00 $0.00
Special Events $18,000.00 $10,732.55 59.63%$7,267.45 $2,434.35
Swim Lessons-Sport/Fit Ed $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00
Youth Programs $30,000.00 $4,738.18 15.79%$25,261.82 $280.00
Driver's Education $36,000.00 $21,000.00 58.33%$15,000.00 $0.00
VRPA Discount $9,600.00 $0.00 0.00%$9,600.00 $0.00
Ski Programs $11,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$11,000.00 $0.00
Chorus Director $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$4,000.00 $0.00
SoBu Night Out $27,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$27,000.00 $0.00
Telephone $500.00 $551.74 110.35%-$51.74 $89.28
Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $157,100.00 $36,797.47 23.42%$120,302.53 $2,803.63
PUBLIC LIBRARY
Library Salaries $424,530.46 $157,608.19 37.13%$266,922.27 $12,354.91
FICA/Medicare $32,476.58 $26,084.58 80.32%$6,392.00 $14,320.72
Library Supplies $6,200.00 $3,522.98 56.82%$2,677.02 $549.28
Books - Adult $17,000.00 $4,676.51 27.51%$12,323.49 $1,441.27
Books - Children $9,000.00 $2,916.48 32.41%$6,083.52 $172.85
DVDs/CDs-Adult $6,000.00 $2,110.32 35.17%$3,889.68 $319.14
DVDs/CDs-Children $1,500.00 $274.64 18.31%$1,225.36 $0.00
Program Supplies-Arts/Cra $2,000.00 $837.79 41.89%$1,162.21 $25.00
Young Adult/Graphic Nov $3,000.00 $911.26 30.38%$2,088.74 $327.54
Bookmobile Maintenance $500.00 $187.44 37.49%$312.56 $0.00
Postage $1,400.00 $681.16 48.65%$718.84 $253.97
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Inter-Library Delivery $1,215.00 $683.68 56.27%$531.32 $268.88
Dues and Subscriptions $2,000.00 $436.68 21.83%$1,563.32 $148.00
Online & Print Subscripti $18,525.00 $8,961.74 48.38%$9,563.26 $1,710.00
Community Programs $6,000.00 $590.79 9.85%$5,409.21 -$229.86
Custodial Services $15,885.00 $5,413.10 34.08%$10,471.90 $117.75
Repair/Maintenance Librar $13,500.00 $6,732.45 49.87%$6,767.55 $692.81
Building Lease $46,200.00 $30,800.00 66.67%$15,400.00 $7,700.00
Computer Software $200.00 $0.00 0.00%$200.00 $0.00
Computer Hardware $2,100.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,100.00 $0.00
Travel & Training $1,500.00 $99.00 6.60%$1,401.00 $0.00
Computer Program Fees $4,167.00 $110.00 2.64%$4,057.00 $110.00
C/L Photocopier Lease Pri $3,000.00 $1,431.77 47.73%$1,568.23 $323.46
Total PUBLIC LIBRARY $617,899.04 $255,070.56 41.28%$362,828.48 $40,605.72
CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE
Park Maint.Salaries-Perm.$243,939.38 $114,938.94 47.12%$129,000.44 $16,647.48
Park Maint.Sal.-Overtime $10,000.00 $3,845.33 38.45%$6,154.67 $1,937.67
FICA/Medicare $19,426.36 $9,392.58 48.35%$10,033.78 $1,509.99
Park Supplies $30,000.00 $4,775.63 15.92%$25,224.37 $552.06
Landscaping $75,000.00 $21,730.00 28.97%$53,270.00 $0.00
Cemetery Supplies $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$5,000.00 $0.00
Homestead at Wheeler Park $0.00 $1,815.95 100.00%-$1,815.95 $735.49
Total CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE $383,365.74 $156,498.43 40.82%$226,867.31 $21,382.69
Total CULTURE AND RECREATION $1,793,815.17 $670,223.73 37.36%$1,123,591.44 $89,363.40
OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES
County Court $145,000.00 $142,362.50 98.18%$2,637.50 $0.00
Winooski Valley Park $60,494.00 $60,494.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
C.C.T.A.$508,732.00 $332,841.34 65.43%$175,890.66 $0.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - GENERAL FUND
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd7Jan
Regional Planning $35,761.00 $35,761.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Total OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES $749,987.00 $571,458.84 76.20%$178,528.16 $0.00
CURRENT PRINCIPAL BONDS
Public Works Facility $98,550.00 $98,568.00 100.02%-$18.00 $0.00
Kennedy Dr Reconstrction $22,493.70 $22,508.00 100.06%-$14.30 $0.00
Lime Kiln Bridge $22,494.00 $22,508.00 100.06%-$14.00 $0.00
PENSION LIABILITY-PRINCIP $381,454.00 $0.00 0.00%$381,454.00 $0.00
F/D Building Improvements $29,991.60 $30,005.00 100.04%-$13.40 $0.00
Police Headquarters $360,000.00 $360,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Communication Equip-CB $190,000.00 $190,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Total CURRENT PRINCIPAL BONDS $1,104,983.30 $723,589.00 65.48%$381,394.30 $0.00
CURRENT INTEREST BONDS
Public Works Facility $2,782.00 -$4,087.25 146.92%$6,869.25 $0.00
Kennedy Dr Recnstrction $5,011.00 $1,343.88 26.82%$3,667.12 $0.00
Lime Kiln Bridge $5,011.00 $1,343.88 26.82%$3,667.12 $0.00
PENSION LIABILITY-INTERES $279,494.00 $0.00 0.00%$279,494.00 $0.00
Sewer Note-Solar Array $12,005.00 $0.00 0.00%$12,005.00 $0.00
F/D Building Improvements $6,719.00 $1,791.50 26.66%$4,927.50 $0.00
Emergency Center $0.00 -$155.79 100.00%$155.79 $0.00
Police Headquarters $175,644.00 $91,458.00 52.07%$84,186.00 $0.00
Communication Equip-CB $25,669.00 $25,763.98 100.37%-$94.98 $0.00
Total CURRENT INTEREST BONDS $512,335.00 $117,458.20 22.93%$394,876.80 $0.00
Total GENERAL FUND $26,293,220.88 $13,195,460.14 50.19%$13,097,760.74 $1,758,969.29
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C.
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21 MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd 7 Jan
W/POLLUTION CONTROL EXPS.
Salaries-Permanent $537,669.66 $348,709.36 64.86%$188,960.30 $78,067.95
Payment to Highway-wages $280,454.00 $288,322.80 102.81%-$7,868.80 $1,061.48
Leave Time Turn-In $7,706.66 $0.00 0.00%$7,706.66 $0.00
Salaries-Overtime $50,000.00 $39,830.27 79.66%$10,169.73 $4,662.35
Payment to Sick Bank Fund $10,000.00 $10,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Payroll Svc & Testing to $1,788.24 $1,788.24 100%$0.00 $1,788.24
PAFO Certification $14,283.00 $0.00 0.00%$14,283.00 $0.00
Sick Bank Payouts $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00
FICA/Medicare $47,403.94 $29,012.27 61.2%$18,391.67 $6,468.59
Payment to Highway-FICA/M $21,454.73 $21,454.73 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Nontaxable Fringe Ben.$4,800.00 $600.00 12.50%$4,200.00 $0.00
Vision Plan $883.20 $219.40 24.84%$663.80 $70.06
Disability Income $1,835.76 $3,147.91 171.48%-$1,312.15 $447.02
Long Term Disability Insu $3,462.84 $0.00 0.00%$3,462.84 $0.00
Group Health Insurance $145,062.22 $76,447.61 52.70%$68,614.61 $369.24
Group Life Insurance $1,502.40 $1,035.03 68.89%$467.37 $147.89
Group Dental Insurance $8,170.80 $3,631.48 44.44%$4,539.32 $566.62
Pension $58,954.00 $36,650.66 62.17%$22,303.34 $20,609.05
ICMA Match $20,156.68 $11,314.92 56.13%$8,841.76 $1,472.42
Pension Note Payment $38,675.00 $0.00 0.00%$38,675.00 $0.00
Office Supplies $2,500.00 $926.66 37.07%$1,573.34 $0.00
Plant Supplies $100,000.00 $82,709.01 82.71%$17,290.99 $1,793.39
Polymer $60,000.00 $43,256.52 72.09%$16,743.48 $21,528.00
Sewer Line Maint/Supplies $25,000.00 $3,037.49 12.15%$21,962.51 $0.00
Pumping Station Supplies $25,000.00 $21,330.69 85.32%$3,669.31 $0.00
Laboratory Supplies $11,500.00 $6,537.66 56.85%$4,962.34 $337.64
Caustic Soda and Lime $100,000.00 $53,539.32 53.54%$46,460.68 $14,070.66
Alum $100,000.00 $85,540.50 85.54%$14,459.50 $12,489.93
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C.
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21 MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd 7 Jan
Water-Airport-B/B-Pump $1,400.00 $787.26 56.23%$612.74 $166.90
Generator Preventive Main $10,000.00 $5,726.26 57.26%$4,273.74 $0.00
Clothing Supplies $3,750.00 $1,662.91 44.34%$2,087.09 $360.87
Truck Parts $7,500.00 $7,903.05 105.37%-$403.05 $1,974.18
Gas - Diesel Fuel - Oil $11,000.00 $6,395.77 58.14%$4,604.23 $1,097.46
Fuel - Airport Parkway $60,000.00 $20,960.31 34.93%$39,039.69 $6,290.71
Fuel - Bartlett Bay $7,500.00 $1,233.08 16.44%$6,266.92 $682.14
Advertising $0.00 $1,092.13 100.00%-$1,092.13 $0.00
Telephone and Alarms $6,500.00 $3,124.45 48.07%$3,375.55 $540.52
Memberships/Dues $1,000.00 $774.99 77.50%$225.01 $0.00
Discharge Permits $15,000.00 $3,750.00 25.00%$11,250.00 $0.00
Workers Comp Insurance $35,671.06 $13,892.49 38.95%$21,778.57 $0.00
Property Insurance $55,562.57 $24,570.80 44.22%$30,991.77 $0.00
Safety $10,000.00 $645.42 6.45%$9,354.58 $0.00
Billing Payment to CWD $50,000.00 $30,180.00 60.36%$19,820.00 $0.00
Soil/Sludge Management $125,000.00 $67,113.66 53.69%$57,886.34 $17,673.91
Landfill Fees $2,000.00 $611.38 30.57%$1,388.62 $0.00
HVAC Maintenance $17,500.00 $43,640.31 249.37%-$26,140.31 $23,676.30
Auditing $6,214.00 $6,214.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Engineering/Consulting $15,000.00 $7,685.98 51.24%$7,314.02 $4,581.25
Landfill Engineering $17,500.00 $25,767.71 147.24%-$8,267.71 $6,980.15
PMT TO STORMWATER-GIS $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00
Administrative Services $150,336.00 $150,336.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Burlington Sewer Lines $0.00 $1,450.25 100.00%-$1,450.25 $0.00
Travel & Training $6,000.00 $2,486.08 41.43%$3,513.92 $935.00
Utilities-Pumping Station $75,000.00 $48,581.23 64.77%$26,418.77 $8,378.89
Utilities--L/Fill Station $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00
Electric-Airport Parkway $180,000.00 $112,145.58 62.30%$67,854.42 $31,307.35
Electric-Bartlett Bay $100,000.00 $81,512.53 81.51%$18,487.47 $11,363.31
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C.
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21 MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd 7 Jan
Replacement-Vehicles $40,000.00 $90,859.75 227.15%-$50,859.75 $0.00
Building Improvements $5,000.00 $677.00 13.54%$4,323.00 $0.00
Pumps Replacements $50,000.00 $46,349.60 92.70%$3,650.40 $0.00
Pump Repairs $40,000.00 $31,909.94 79.77%$8,090.06 $1,944.84
Shelburne Rd Relocation $0.00 $18,994.75 100.00%-$18,994.75 $18,994.75
Airport Pkwy Upgrade/Expn $0.00 $4,890.00 100.00%-$4,890.00 $0.00
Bartlett Bay Upgrades $400,000.00 $19,585.75 4.90%$380,414.25 $0.00
Hadley Sewer Project $225,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$225,000.00 $0.00
Loan for Airport Parkway $1,272,059.74 $0.00 0.00%$1,272,059.74 $0.00
Capital Improvements-CIP $260,000.00 $146,301.89 56.27%$113,698.11 $14,083.79
Total W/POLLUTION CONTROL $4,952,756.50 $2,198,854.84 44.40%$2,753,901.66 $316,982.85
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - ENTERPRISE FUND/ STORM WATER UTILITIES EXPS
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21 MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd 7 Jan
S/WATER UTILITIES EXPS
Salaries-Permanent $561,594.99 $342,123.67 60.92%$219,471.32 $96,678.49
Payment to Highway-Wages $78,215.00 $78,215.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Salaries-Overtime $23,000.00 $7,772.50 33.79%$15,227.50 $5,093.56
Payroll Svc & Testing to $1,788.24 $1,788.24 100%$0.00 $1,788.24
FICA/Medicare $44,721.52 $27,477.55 61.44%$17,243.97 $7,877.49
Nontaxable Fringe Benefit $4,200.00 $300.00 7.14%$3,900.00 $0.00
Vision Plan $711.61 $131.97 18.55%$579.64 $43.99
Disability Income Insuran $5,939.91 $3,791.79 63.84%$2,148.12 $500.80
Group Health Insurance $142,970.94 $64,927.35 45.41%$78,043.59 $369.24
Health Insurance FICA $1,119.96 $0.00 0.00%$1,119.96 $0.00
Group Life Insurance $1,605.69 $1,113.48 69.35%$492.21 $147.89
Group Dental Insurance $6,437.31 $2,732.24 42.44%$3,705.07 $452.34
Pension $79,047.77 $0.00 0.00%$79,047.77 $0.00
ICMA Match $28,736.12 $14,414.19 50.16%$14,321.93 $1,794.02
Pension Note Payment $26,510.00 $0.00 0.00%$26,510.00 $0.00
Office Supplies $1,750.00 $616.93 35.25%$1,133.07 $88.14
Small Equipment/Tools $2,500.00 $307.12 12.28%$2,192.88 $0.00
Uniforms/Supplies $7,500.00 $3,638.60 48.51%$3,861.40 $348.37
Gasoline $2,500.00 $947.26 37.89%$1,552.74 $232.76
Oil $300.00 $67.22 22.41%$232.78 $0.00
Diesel Fuel $5,000.00 $2,264.46 45.29%$2,735.54 $637.43
Permit Requirement-Educat $10,000.00 $6,000.00 60.00%$4,000.00 $0.00
Telephone $2,000.00 $1,001.85 50.09%$998.15 $153.79
Postage $50.00 $0.00 0.00%$50.00 $0.00
Membership/Dues $300.00 $225.00 75.00%$75.00 $45.00
Discharge Permits Renewal $20,000.00 $15,016.00 75.08%$4,984.00 $0.00
Workers Comp Insurance $22,999.48 $11,496.56 49.99%$11,502.92 $0.00
Property Insurance $12,849.33 $6,643.70 51.70%$6,205.63 $0.00
Unemployment Insurance $2,000.00 $2,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Expenditure Report - ENTERPRISE FUND/ STORM WATER UTILITIES EXPS
Current Year Period 7 Jan
% Budget Unencumbered FY-20/21 MTD
Account Budget Expenditures Expended Balance Pd 7 Jan
GIS-Fees/Software $38,000.00 $26,373.79 69.40%$11,626.21 $2,814.99
Sediment & Depris Disposa $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00
Water Quality Monitoring $33,000.00 $883.21 2.68%$32,116.79 $119.46
Building/Grounds Maint $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00
Vehicle Maintenance $7,500.00 $10,823.41 144.31%-$3,323.41 $2,184.76
Storm System Maint Materi $45,000.00 $33,284.66 73.97%$11,715.34 $19,184.50
Printing $100.00 $0.00 0.00%$100.00 $0.00
Legal Services $22,500.00 $1,002.50 4.46%$21,497.50 $0.00
To GF-Audit and Actuary $3,555.00 $3,555.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Engineering-Watershed $60,000.00 $3,720.25 6.20%$56,279.75 $941.25
Billing Payment CWD $50,000.00 $30,180.00 60.36%$19,820.00 $0.00
Office Equipment Maintena $2,000.00 $1,083.61 54.18%$916.39 $163.12
Equipment Rental $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00
Administrative Services $134,392.00 $134,392.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Conference/Training Expen $6,500.00 $3,773.75 58.06%$2,726.25 $113.00
S/W Bldg Utilities $3,500.00 $1,199.10 34.26%$2,300.90 $290.85
Stormwater Pumps Electric $300.00 $126.16 42.05%$173.84 $20.29
Vehicles/Equipment $171,000.00 $90,859.75 53.13%$80,140.25 $0.00
Stormwater Capital Projec $1,481,000.00 $160,471.23 10.84%$1,320,528.77 $3,150.50
Office Furniture/Equipmen $2,500.00 $99.81 3.99%$2,400.19 $0.00
Flow Restoration Plan Ana $7,500.00 $4,658.81 62.12%$2,841.19 $485.00
FICA Payment to Highway $18,773.00 $18,773.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Total S/WATER UTILITIES EXPS $3,185,467.87 $1,120,272.72 35.17%$2,065,195.15 $145,719.27
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Revenue Report - GENERAL FUND
January, 2021
Estimated Received % Budget Uncollected FY-20/21 MTD
Account Revenue To Date Received Balance Pd 7 Jan
TAX REVENUE
TAX REVENUE $16,941,889.09 -$12,738,714.21 75.19%$4,203,174.88 -$135,207.66
LOCAL OPTION TAXES $4,050,000.00 -$1,258,601.22 31.08%$2,791,398.78 $0.00
Total TAX REVENUE $20,991,889.09 -$13,997,315.43 66.68%$6,994,573.66 -$135,207.66
INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX $337,800.00 -$100,966.48 29.89%$236,833.52 -$1,381.53
Health ctr-Other Agencies $0.00 -$133,668.02 100.00%-$133,668.02 -$8,140.00
CITY MANAGER $662,462.00 -$495,795.15 74.84%$166,666.85 -$114,944.34
CITY CLERK $269,300.00 -$250,276.41 92.94%$19,023.59 -$32,783.50
PLANNING $389,700.00 -$177,568.83 45.57%$212,131.17 -$17,445.40
FIRE DEPARTMENT $440,700.00 -$234,616.54 53.24%$206,083.46 -$60,289.26
ELECTRICAL INSPECTION $70,000.00 -$17,995.00 25.71%$52,005.00 -$1,565.00
AMBULANCE $875,800.00 -$450,921.71 51.49%$424,878.29 -$218,607.19
POLICE DEPARTMENT $437,364.80 -$218,756.38 50.02%$218,608.42 -$54,541.68
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $1,606,815.00 -$739,212.31 46.00%$867,602.69 -$60,899.62
Total RECREATION $205,600.00 -$47,704.25 23.20%$157,895.75 -$8,000.00
COMMUNITY LIBRARY $5,790.00 -$2,921.27 50.45%$2,868.73 -$285.41
Total Department Revenue $5,301,331.80 -$2,870,402.35 54.14%$2,430,929.45 -$578,882.93
Total GENERAL FUND $26,293,220.89 -$16,867,717.78 64.15%$9,425,503.11 -$714,090.59
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Revenue Report - GENERAL FUND
January, 2021
Estimated Received % Budget Uncollected FY-20/21 MTD
Account Revenue To Date Received Balance Pd 7 Jan
TAX REVENUE
TAX REVENUE
Tax Current Budget $16,681,889.09 -$12,576,142.21 75.39%$4,105,746.88 -$135,207.66
VT Payment in Lieu of Tax $195,000.00 -$162,572.00 83.37%$32,428.00 $0.00
Taxes Reappraisal/ACT 60 $65,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$65,000.00 $0.00
Total TAX REVENUE $16,941,889.09 -$12,738,714.21 75.19%$4,203,174.88 -$135,207.66
LOCAL OPTION TAXES
Local Option Tax-Sales $3,000,000.00 -$1,027,820.59 34.26%$1,972,179.41 $0.00
Local Option Tax-Rooms/Me $1,050,000.00 -$230,780.63 21.98%$819,219.37 $0.00
Total LOCAL OPTION TAXES $4,050,000.00 -$1,258,601.22 31.08%$2,791,398.78 $0.00
Total TAX REVENUE $20,991,889.09 -$13,997,315.43 66.68%$6,994,573.66 -$135,207.66
INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX
Penalty Current & Prior $150,000.00 -$66,459.16 44.31%$83,540.84 $2,551.38
Interest Current & Prior $75,000.00 -$13,595.52 18.13%$61,404.48 -$3,932.91
Abatements/Write-offs $0.00 $148.20 100.00%$148.20 $0.00
Attorney Fees $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00
Fee to Collect State Educ $95,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$95,000.00 $0.00
Current Use $14,800.00 -$21,060.00 142.30%-$6,260.00 $0.00
Total INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX $337,800.00 -$100,966.48 29.89%$236,833.52 -$1,381.53
CITY MANAGER
Health ctr-Other Agencies $0.00 -$133,668.02 100.00%-$133,668.02 -$8,140.00
Administrative Services-W $47,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$47,500.00 $0.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Revenue Report - GENERAL FUND
January, 2021
Estimated Received % Budget Uncollected FY-20/21 MTD
Account Revenue To Date Received Balance Pd 7 Jan
Administrative Services-S $134,392.00 -$134,392.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Administrative Services-W $150,336.00 -$150,336.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
From Sewer-Audit & Actuar $6,214.00 -$6,214.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
From SW-Audit & Actuary $3,555.00 -$3,555.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Wellness Payment $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00
Pension Liab Note-WPC $38,675.00 $0.00 0.00%$38,675.00 $0.00
Pension Liab Note-SW $26,510.00 $0.00 0.00%$26,510.00 $0.00
From Water-Audit $2,100.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,100.00 $0.00
From WPC-Payroll Testing $700.00 -$1,788.24 255.46%-$1,088.24 -$1,788.24
From SW-Payroll Testing $480.00 -$1,788.24 372.55%-$1,308.24 -$1,788.24
Adminstrative Services-CJ $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00
Interest on Investment $225,000.00 -$24,600.85 10.93%$200,399.15 -$4,069.86
Solar Credits $12,000.00 -$8,122.44 67.69%$3,877.56 -$516.60
CIGNA/VLCT Insur Rebate $0.00 -$55.00 100.00%-$55.00 $0.00
Miscellaneous $2,000.00 -$164,943.38 8 247.17%-$162,943.38 -$106,781.40
Total CITY MANAGER $662,462.00 -$629,463.17 74.84%$166,666.85 -$114,944.34
CITY CLERK
Recording Fees $180,000.00 -$182,896.15 101.61%-$2,896.15 -$23,930.50
Preservation of Records $0.00 -$6.00 100.00%-$6.00 $0.00
Photocopy Fees $26,000.00 -$13,868.05 53.34%$12,131.95 -$1,538.00
Photocopies-Vital Records $26,000.00 -$28,111.00 108.12%-$2,111.00 -$3,735.00
Pet Licenses $23,000.00 -$3,326.90 14.46%$19,673.10 -$1,520.00
Pet Control Fees $1,500.00 -$600.00 40.00%$900.00 $0.00
Beverage/Cabaret License $9,000.00 -$2,035.00 22.61%$6,965.00 -$1,965.00
Entertainment Permits $0.00 -$25.00 100.00%-$25.00 -$25.00
Marriage Licenses $1,400.00 -$1,000.00 71.43%$400.00 -$70.00
Green Mountain Passports $300.00 -$220.00 73.33%$80.00 $0.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Revenue Report - GENERAL FUND
January, 2021
Estimated Received % Budget Uncollected FY-20/21 MTD
Account Revenue To Date Received Balance Pd 7 Jan
Motor Vehicle Renewals $600.00 -$162.00 27.00%$438.00 $0.00
Election Expenses Reimbur $0.00 -$8,805.00 100.00%-$8,805.00 $0.00
School Reimburse-Election $1,500.00 -$9,221.31 614.75%-$7,721.31 $0.00
Total CITY CLERK $269,300.00 -$250,276.41 92.94%$19,023.59 -$32,783.50
PLANNING
Zoning and Planning $90,000.00 -$53,308.67 59.23%$36,691.33 -$4,240.00
Bianchi Ruling $11,000.00 -$14,453.00 131.39%-$3,453.00 -$1,442.00
Building & Sign Permits $275,000.00 -$108,057.16 39.29%$166,942.84 -$11,463.40
Sewer Inspection Fees $2,500.00 -$1,750.00 70.00%$750.00 -$300.00
Peddlers' Permits $1,200.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,200.00 $0.00
Transfer in-Solar Credits $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00
Total PLANNING $389,700.00 -$177,568.83 45.57%$212,131.17 -$17,445.40
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Grant $0.00 -$73,148.00 100.00%-$73,148.00 $0.00
Outside Employment $700.00 $0.00 0.00%$700.00 $0.00
Fire Inspection Revenue $440,000.00 -$161,468.54 36.70%$278,531.46 -$60,289.26
Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $440,700.00 -$234,616.54 53.24%$206,083.46 -$60,289.26
ELECTRICAL INSPECTION
Electrical Inspection-Rev $70,000.00 -$17,995.00 25.71%$52,005.00 -$1,565.00
Total ELECTRICAL INSPECTION $70,000.00 -$17,995.00 25.71%$52,005.00 -$1,565.00
AMBULANCE
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Revenue Report - GENERAL FUND
January, 2021
Estimated Received % Budget Uncollected FY-20/21 MTD
Account Revenue To Date Received Balance Pd 7 Jan
Tax Revenues $155,000.00 -$155,000.00 100.00%$0.00 -$155,000.00
Ambulance Service Billing $710,000.00 -$294,522.80 41.48%$415,477.20 -$63,382.19
Grand Isle Billing $5,800.00 -$848.91 14.64%$4,951.09 $0.00
Miscellaneous Income $5,000.00 -$550.00 11.00%$4,450.00 -$225.00
Total AMBULANCE $875,800.00 -$450,921.71 51.49%$424,878.29 -$218,607.19
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Vermont District Court $10,000.00 -$3,582.57 35.83%$6,417.43 -$216.50
Traffic Safety Grant $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$5,000.00 $0.00
Sale of Cruisers/Bequest $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$4,000.00 $0.00
Police Reports $3,500.00 -$73.20 2.09%$3,426.80 $0.00
I.C.A.C.$3,500.00 -$1,944.83 55.57%$1,555.17 -$90.52
SHARP $20,000.00 -$4,257.98 21.29%$15,742.02 $0.00
Drug Task Force Grant $115,000.00 -$80,630.08 70.11%$34,369.92 -$16,719.64
Parking Tickets $0.00 -$4,661.12 100.00%-$4,661.12 $0.00
Alarm Registrations $20,000.00 -$1,830.00 9.15%$18,170.00 -$120.00
Alarm Fines $2,500.00 -$1,660.00 66.40%$840.00 $0.00
Off Duty Police $10,000.00 -$31,777.46 317.77%-$21,777.46 -$13,884.55
Bullet Proof Vest Grant $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00
Police Impact Fees $110,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$110,000.00 $0.00
3rd Floor Lease Revenue $103,489.80 -$74,712.13 72.19%$28,777.67 -$18,331.32
Solar Credits $1,375.00 -$7,122.01 517.96%-$5,747.01 -$4,869.15
Miscellaneous - Police $6,000.00 -$6,505.00 108.42%-$505.00 -$310.00
Xfer In-Fund 207 $20,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$20,000.00 $0.00
Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $437,364.80 -$218,756.38 50.02%$218,608.42 -$54,541.68
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Revenue Report - GENERAL FUND
January, 2021
Estimated Received % Budget Uncollected FY-20/21 MTD
Account Revenue To Date Received Balance Pd 7 Jan
Road Opening Permits $120,000.00 -$37,937.00 31.61%$82,063.00 $0.00
Overweight truck permits $2,000.00 -$120.00 6.00%$1,880.00 -$65.00
Highway State Aid $225,000.00 -$234,833.64 104.37%-$9,833.64 -$50,886.74
Paving & Other Grants $600,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$600,000.00 $0.00
Fuel Pump Surcharge $6,000.00 -$1,554.47 25.91%$4,445.53 -$360.47
HazMat Facility Lease $23,000.00 -$26,961.65 117.22%-$3,961.65 $0.00
School Bus Parts Reimbure $30,000.00 -$16,461.13 54.87%$13,538.87 -$3,829.62
School gas/diesel reimbur $140,000.00 -$13,839.40 9.89%$126,160.60 -$4,207.27
School vehicle repair pay $20,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$20,000.00 $0.00
Salary Reimbursement-WPC $280,454.00 -$280,454.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
FICA Reimbursement-WPC $22,944.00 -$21,454.73 93.51%$1,489.27 $0.00
Benefits Reimbursement-WP $78,215.00 -$78,215.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Salary Reimbursement-SW $18,773.00 -$18,773.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00
Benefits Reimbursement-SW $10,429.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,429.00 $0.00
Hgwy Misc Revenue $30,000.00 -$8,608.29 28.69%$21,391.71 -$1,550.52
Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $1,606,815.00 -$739,212.31 46.00%$867,602.69 -$60,899.62
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Donations $0.00 -$2,500.00 100.00%-$2,500.00 $0.00
VRPA Tickets $9,600.00 $0.00 0.00%$9,600.00 $0.00
Youth Programs $70,000.00 -$11,551.50 -16.50%$58,448.50 $110.00
Adult Evening Classes $28,000.00 -$427.75 -1.53%$27,572.25 $0.00
Special Event Revenue $12,000.00 -$8,000.00 66.67%$4,000.00 -$8,000.00
Afternoon Skiing/Middle S $16,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$16,000.00 $0.00
Drivers Education $40,000.00 -$25,225.00 63.06%$14,775.00 $0.00
SoBu Night Out $30,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$30,000.00 $0.00
Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $205,600.00 -$45,204.25 21.99%$160,395.75 -$8,000.00
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Revenue Report - GENERAL FUND
January, 2021
Estimated Received % Budget Uncollected FY-20/21 MTD
Account Revenue To Date Received Balance Pd 7 Jan
Total RECREATION $205,600.00 -$47,704.25 23.20%$157,895.75 -$8,000.00
COMMUNITY LIBRARY
Grants $390.00 -$720.00 184.62%-$330.00 $0.00
Library Lost Books $0.00 -$918.79 100.00%-$918.79 -$160.41
Fines and Fees $1,600.00 -$232.68 14.54%$1,367.32 $0.00
Non-Resident Fees $1,500.00 -$687.00 45.80%$813.00 -$40.00
Conference Room Rental $100.00 $0.00 0.00%$100.00 $0.00
Libriary Copies and Print $2,200.00 -$349.10 15.87%$1,850.90 -$85.00
LIBRARY MISCELLANEOUS $0.00 -$13.70 100.00%-$13.70 $0.00
Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $5,790.00 -$2,921.27 50.45%$2,868.73 -$285.41
Total GENERAL FUND $26,293,220.89 -$16,867,717.78 64.15%$9,425,503.11 -$714,090.59
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Revenue Report - ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C.
January, 2021
Estimated Received % Budget Uncollected FY-20/21 MTD
Account Revenue To Date Received Balance Pd 7 Jan
OPERATING TRANSFERS IN
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
W.P.C. User Fees $3,800,000.00 -$2,028,354.77 53.38%$1,771,645.23 -$269,060.23
W.P.C. Truck Charges $40,000.00 -$21,685.50 54.21%$18,314.50 $0.00
Connection Fees $350,000.00 -$138,142.83 39.47%$211,857.17 -$17,644.48
Total CHARGES FOR SERVICES $4,190,000.00 -$2,188,183.10 52.22%$2,001,816.90 -$286,704.71
BOND AND LOAN PROCEEDS
Colchester A/P Pkwy Pmt $742,310.00 $0.00 0.00%$742,310.00 $0.00
Notes and Bond Proceeds $0.00 -$2,342,375.03 100.00%-$2,342,375.03 -$2,342,375.03
Total BOND AND LOAN PROCEED $742,310.00 -$2,342,375.03 315.55%-$1,600,065.03 -$2,342,375.03
MISCELLANEOUS
Miscellaneous Rev.-W.P.C.$10,000.00 -$13,845.00 138.45%-$3,845.00 $0.00
Total ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C $4,942,310.00 -$4,544,403.13 91.95%$397,906.87 -$2,629,079.74
City of South Burlington General Ledger
Revenue Report - ENTERPRISE FUND/STORMWATER FUND
January, 2021
Estimated Received % Budget Uncollected FY-20/21 MTD
Account Revenue To Date Received Balance Pd 7 Jan
S/WATER UTILITIES REVENUE
Intergovernmental Revenue $750,000.00 -$49,254.34 6.57%$700,745.66 $0.00
S/W User Fees - Water Bil $2,400,000.00 -$1,493,160.29 62.22%$906,839.71 -$220,137.59
Payment from GF re: GIS $38,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$38,000.00 $0.00
Pmts from other towns $0.00 -$21,336.68 100.00%-$21,336.68 -$5,642.70
Land Owner Payments $725,000.00 -$58,357.37 8.05%$666,642.63 $0.00
Stormwater Miscellaneous $80,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$80,000.00 $0.00
Total STORM WATER UTILITIES $3,993,000.00 -$1,622,108.68 40.62%$2,370,891.32 -$225,780.29