HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-13-01 - Supplemental - 0252 Autumn Hill RoadCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
a #5
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
Report preparation date: March 1, 2013
Plans received: January 4, 2013
252 Autumn Hill Road 2-LOT SUBDIVISION
SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-13-01
Meetina date: March 5. 2013
Owner/Applicant
Vincent & Allyson Bolduc
252 Autumn Hill Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Contact Person Property Information
David Burke SEQ Zoning District- NRT & NRP Sub -Districts
1 Corporate Drive 16.45 acres
Essex Junction VT 05452
Location Map
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Vincent & Allyson Bolduc, hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking sketch plan review
to subdivide a 16.45 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) lots of 15.24
acres (lot #1), and 1.21 acres (lot #2), 252 Autumn Hill Road.
City Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff,
have reviewed the plans submitted on January 4, 2013 and have the following comments.
SUBDIVISION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions
shall comDly with the followina standards and conditions:
The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in
the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in
which it is located.
The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast
Quadrant.
Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines,
services, and service modifications shall be underground.
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the
affected district(s).
Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington
Comprehensive Plan.
Southeast Quadrant District
This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district. Therefore it is subject to
the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR.
9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following
standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning
District.
A. Height.
(1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ-
NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section
3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts.
(2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub-
district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall
not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
3
DEPARTMENT OF
PLANNING & ZONING
The applicant is proposing to construct one new home on the smaller lot. The Board should
discuss this.
B. Open Space and Resource Protection.
(1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize
opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels
(2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent
with the Regulating Plan for the applicable subdistrict allowing carefully planned
development at the average densities provided in this bylaw.
(3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing
management shall be established by the applicant.
(4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and
after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or
dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this
finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be
covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of
Environmental Conservation.
(5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland,
stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is
aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than
for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other
fencing made of natural materials is encouraged.
The Board should discuss whether the location of the proposed home on the smaller lot will have
any effect on potential future development of the larger lot with respect to the criteria (1-5) above.
C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged
through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited
to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer
areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and
infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such
as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall
neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types
are strongly encouraged.
The Board should discuss this.
D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development
Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific
development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the
location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not
limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities.
(1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet
the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as
evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water
and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation.
This shall be reviewed by the Director of Public Works as part of the preliminary plat application.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
(2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and
lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such
services and infrastructure to adjacent properties.
The Board should discuss whether it would be appropriate to require a recreation path
easement along the western property line as it has for other properties in the vicinity in recent
years. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee should review the plans and provide
comments prior to final plat approval.
Furthermore, the Board should discuss whether the subdivision of land or the placement of the
unit and driveway on the smaller lot will have any effect on the extension of infrastructure to
adjacent properties as indicated in the criteria above.
(3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that
is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific
agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City
Council.
Staff has already stated that the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee and City
Engineer should comment on this matter prior to final plat approval.
(4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate
fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not
limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two
directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number
and location of hydrants.
The Fire Department shall comment on the plans as prior to final plat approval.
E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management
strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficient to create
connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service
vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may
rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical
review by City staff or consultants.
The Board should discuss these criteria with respect to the plan presented.
(1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such
services and infrastructure to adjacent properties.
A private driveway is proposed as part of this proposal.
(2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and
maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to
maintenance that has been approved by the City Council.
A private driveway is proposed as part of this proposal.
(3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets
and neighborhoods shall apply.
R
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
5
A private driveway is proposed as part of this proposal.
9.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District; Specific Standards
DEPARTMENT OF
PLANNING & ZONING
The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as
enumerated in this Section.
A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern
(1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400
linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400
feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections..
(2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 400
feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not
exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to
allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open
space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4).
(3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the
property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these
Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly
encouraged.
(4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to
1:5 recommended.
B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards
(1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in
the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage
through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public
collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and
9-9 below.
(2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional
minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street.
Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that
promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require
supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose.
(3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3)
Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide.
Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City
Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches
DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center.
(4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4).
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
(5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing
distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5).
(6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be
provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces.
Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development
patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather
than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety.
C. Residential Design
(1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary
entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary
building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines
apply to arterial streets).
(2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation
approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades
should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches,
stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are
encouraged.
(3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the
building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings
should be set back fifteen feet (15') from the back of sidewalk.
(4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front
setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed
or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials.
(5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front
building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a
minimum of eight feet.
(6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods
and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and
within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing
types.
At this time the applicant is planning for the addition of a single dwelling unit. Staff recommends
Board should discuss this issue and decide if the applicant shall be bound to the design criteria
included above. If the Board would like to assess the design criteria, they should do so prior to final
plat approval.
Respectfully submitted,
a�-z &*,
Cathyan WLa Rose, AICP, City Planner
O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC
CIVIL ENGINEERING I REGULATORY AND PERMIT PREPARATION I LAND SURVEYING I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I LAND USE PLANNING
January 2, 2013
Mr. Ray BeLair
Zoning Administrator
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
RE: 252 Autumn Hill Road
Dear Ray:
We are writing on behalf of Vincent and Allyson Bolduc to request Sketch Plan
scheduling for a proposed two lot subdivision of their 16.45 acre single family parcel at
252 Autumn Hill Road.
Proposed Lot # 1 will be 15.24 acres in size and include the existing home, which
will continue to be served by Autumn Hill Road, an on -site individual drilled well and
on -site sewage system. Lot #2 will be 1.21 acres in size fronting Dorset Street and will be
served by a proposed driveway off Dorset Street and connections to municipal water and
sewer. The proposed layout of Lot #2 allows for potential future subdivision into two (2)
lots. Lot #2 does not meet the recommended 2 to 1 lot depth to width ratio for the
Southeast Quadrant. We request approval as proposed, as increase depth while possible
would simply place more wetland area in multiple ownerships. The access to Lot 42 is
via easement from Lot # 1 to allow for future potential subdivision of retained Lot # 1.
Please find the following attachments:
1. Five (5) full size copies, one (1) 11" x 17" copy and one (1) digital copy
of the Sketch Plan (Sht. 1;
2. Sketch Plan Review Application with $438.00 application fee (($350 base
+ $13 recording fee + ($37.50 / 1st two units x 2 units) = $438.00)
Southeast Quadrant Supplemental fee applies.
Please schedule this submittal for Sketch Plan at the next available hearing and
call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
David W. Burke
Enc.
cc: Vincent Bolduc
2007/7048/SketchAppCover
1 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE #1 ESSEX JUNCTION VERMONT 05452
TEL 802 878 9990 I FAX 802 878 9989 1 obca@olearyburke com
252 Autumn Hill Road
South Burlington, VT.
August 12, 2013
TO: Ray Belair
Office of Planning and Zoning
FROM: Vince Bolduc
RE: Our application for a one unit subdivision
Ray, we would like to request a six month extension on our application for the one unit
subdivision on our 16.45 acres on Dorset Street.
At our first meeting before the Planning Commission, the Commission expressed the hope that
our proposed access point on Dorset Street would align with Midland Ave. After the new survey
of our property was accomplished about two months ago, we saw that the overlap with Midland
was substantial, but not total. To address this, we would need an easement from the former
Dorset Farms developers of Milot, Larkin and Bartlett. They still own the open land to the south
of us, including the land that the City easement to the pumping station utilizes. Our proposal to
them would be for us to use much of that same easement in exchange for our allowing them an
easement on our property for better access to their property.
Not incidentally, they had contacted us several years ago about exactly such an easement for an
earlier proposal of theirs. We were prepared to make that arrangement, but their project was
ultimately dropped.
Since two of the principals are now deceased, I have been trying to reach Al Bartlett and have
just last week (through David Burke) made that contact. Bartlett seems to be interested but needs
to take our proposal to the two widows for their approval. This make take some time to finalize
this agreement (if we are successful) and thus the need for an extension.
Would this extension be acceptable to the City? A reply by e-mail would be sufficient.
I thank you in advance.
Vrck,Bold"
vbolduc(asmcvt.edu
252 Autumn Hill Road
South Burlington, VT.
August 12, 2013
TO: Ray Belair
Office of Planning and Zoning
FROM: Vince Bolduc
RE: Building a farm structure
Ray, following our conversation a few weeks ago, my wife and I have decided to proceed with
the sugar house on our property. It will be 12x 16 on a concrete slab and built from the Hemlocks
felled by last year's storm and milled on our property by a commercial sawyer. It will also be 35
feet from our nearest neighbor.
As you may recall, my wife and I have made small quantities of syrup in the past, but I had
preferred not to commit myself to generating $1,000 worth of income from our maple syrup
production, but the more I have explored the issue the more sensible it appeared to be. I hope I
will have this sugar house ready for production in the spring. Here are some calculations that
show its economic viability:
• I did a systematic survey of maple trees within reasonable distance from the house
revealing 67 mature and tap -able trees. Virtually all of these are greater than the 12 inch
minimum. Many are up to three feet in diameter.
• Minimum tress size for tapping: 12"
• Trees 12 -17 " only one tap
• 18-24" 2 taps
• 24+ 3 taps
• The ratio of sap to finished product is 42:1.
• Each TAP can produce 10-16 gals of sap per season.
• With 67 trees and an average of 2 taps per tree we could have 134 taps working.
• At 10-16 gallons per tap, that would give us between 1,340 and 2,144 gallons of sap.
• The minimum estimate of 1,340 gallons divided by 42 = 32 gallons of finished syrup.
• I just looked online for retail price per gallon and it is about $55.
• 32 times $55 is $1,769 in income.
• Our new evaporator is supposed to be able to boil off about 12 gallons per hour, so we
could make a gallon of syrup every 3.5 hours.
I also contacted Wendy Houston -Anderson at the Vermont Agriculture Department and found
that by their standards, this would indeed meet their definition of an agricultural operation.
This new initiative will be an extension of many of our other agricultural activities over the
decades. Besides our large garden, we have previously raised pigs, sheep, goats, chickens,
turkeys) and have planted thousands of trees (Pine, Ash, Maple, Locust). We continue to
carefully maintain both our wood lot at 252 Autumn Hill Rd., and our 6 acre wood lot on our
contiguous parcel at 1800 Dorset Street. We have already harvested some of these trees both for
saw logs and firewood. We mow many acres yearly. When I have the time, I am able to give
cords of split and dry firewood to charitable causes (e.g., "Warm Vermont") organized by the
local churches or the state. One year we gave 600 pounds of grapes to the Food Shelf. We have
18 apple trees that also allow us to give away extra produce, as well as occasionally some cider
made from our antique hand -crank cider press. While all of this has commercial value, we have
not until now thought about this as a productive agricultural effort.
Sincerely,
C
Vince Bolduc
863-4902
rr
southburlington
PLANNING & ZONING
Permit Number SD- 13 - d
(office use onl
APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT
All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the
requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being
rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please
provide pertinent information only.
1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #)
Vincent & Allyson Bolduc, 252 Autumn Hill Road, South Burlington, VT 05407
Phone: 802-863-4902
2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #) Vol: 134; Page: 515
3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as owner
4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.)
Fee Simple
5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #)
David Burke (802-878-9990; fax 878-9989), 1 Corporate Drive, Suite 1 Essex Jct , VT 05452
5a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS dwburke@olearyburke.com
6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 252 Autumn Hill Road
7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 77-01780
8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a) General project description (explain what you want approval for):
A proposed two lot subdivision of an existing 16.45 acre single family parcel with Lot #1 being 15.24 acres and
retaining the existing home and Lot #2 being 1.21 acres for a proposed single family home.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com
(/
b) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use
Existing single family home off Autumn Hill Road
c) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to
-emain) Residential, refer to Sketch plan for lot sizes.
d) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain)
3,500 S.F. Existing (Including Barn) on retained Lot #1, Approx 2,500 S F proposed for Lot #2
e) Proposed height of building (if applicable) 45 Feet maximum
fj Total parcel size(s) 16.45 acres
g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please
note if Overlay Districts are applicable) NIA
9) 9a: SEQ SUBDISTRICT (identify in each)
Acreage Units Existing Units proposed
NRP 274 0 0
NRT 13.71 1 1(2 total)
NR 0 0 0
VR 0 0 0
VC 0 0 0
9b: Are Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs) being utilized? No
If yes, please identify how many and from which parcel (street address)
10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements,
covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) Existing Autumn Hill Road access easement a proposed access utility easement from Lot #1 to Lot #2.
11) LOT COVERAGE
a) Building: Existing 0.35
b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc)
Existing 2.1 %
c) Front yard (along each street) Existing o %
Proposed 0.6 (5 Max.) %
Proposed 3 3 (30 max) %
Proposed 11.6 %
2 Southeast Quadrant Sketch Plan Application Form Rev 12-2011
It
12) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL
FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Proposed municipal water
and sewer connections for proposed Lot #2.
13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 2013
14) PLANS AND FEE
Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development
Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format)
copy of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of
submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. C
NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining
property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington
Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application
complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public
hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the
City prior to the start of any public hearing.
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is
accurate to the best of my knowledge. 1-��
111
c--
GNATURE OF APUKICANT
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER
Don t write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION: J�
I have reviewed this sketch plan application an find it to be:
Complete nco to
%s ,
inistrative Officer ` Date
The applicant or pernnttee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits
for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist.
Southeast Quadrant Sketch Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 15th day of February, 2013, a copy of the foregoing public notice for
Sketch flan application #SD-13-01, was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all
properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-
way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by
the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following
parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington
Land Development Regulations:
List of recipients:
(full names and addresses)
Parcel ID#: 0570-01760
Dorset East Associates, LLC
25 Pinecrest Drive
Essex Jct., VT 05452
Parcel ID#: 0085-00232
Jeffrey & Elizabeth Goldberg
232 Autumn Hill Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Parcel ID#: 0085-00250
Charles & Judith Scott
250 Autumn Hill Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont, this 15th day of February 2013.
Printed Name: Peter F. Heil El, CPESC
Phone number and email: hone: 802 878- 990• email: heil ole burke.com
Signature:
Date: 15113
Remit to: City of South Burlington
Department of Planning & Zoning
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
South Burlington Sample Certificate ojService Form. Rev. 1-2012
Legend -
rKOUEGT D ARY
-- --
rROfMTY LINE
5ETDACK
---------- ---------
CONTOUR LINE 1 U5G5 DATUMI
morO5ED FINISH GRADE GONTOLR
0
EXISTING IRON MPE
EI
EXISTING CONCRETE MON T
IRON rIM (TO DE 5ETI
GONC.RETE MONUMENT ITO DE SET)
`IIa
UTILITY rOLE
C
EXISTING ELECTRIC/TV/TI-rX HOW LINE
SEWER LIME
5TMWINE
WATERLRE
EXIST 1N6 OrO51W HYDRANT
- -
SILT FENCE
Zoning Informatio)
rAKC L ID1. 00155-00752 11645 ACRESI
ZONED. 50UTFEA5T QUACK - MEIG/CORHOOD
RESIDENTIAL -TRANSITION (MO-Nt-T ♦ SEO - W)
DIMUOWNML ►EQUMOOR!•
MINIMUM LOT AEA, 9000 5F DINGLE FAMILY)
SETDAGRb
FRONT. 70 FT ISO FT FKOIA DOR5ET 5TREETI
SIDE. p FT
REM. SO FT
DUILDIN& COVERA6E. DZ MAX
TOTAL LOT GOVEKA6 . = MAX
WATER• MU ICIrAL GONECTION
SEWER. MMIGIrA CONECTIM
5TORMWATER. ON-51TE
Soil Types
V48 VEX MINES CLAY 2-62 5LOrE5 I6M Ar-KESI
WC VERGENNES CLAY. 6-121 5LOrE5 1367 ACRES
CY GOVIWTON SILTY CLAY 1268 AC.RESI
AC FAKMINGTON EXTREMELY KOGKY LOAM 5-20Z
�C /
11 r Y� 1 r
If l \ ) 1 \ \ i �� �i mil✓ V
1 \ \ 1 1 \
T�' 30• X ! 4• HOMEidOlp
SG tLE PURPOSES ONLY (TO \ I 1 I / l•Y!
+ / I \1 \ BE 5ERVED DY MUNIGIPAL 1/ I I ( �
i ( I WATFK'*,\SEWER)
\� ) GLA55 2 WETLAND
\LOT 112 \ \\\`Q,/ ' / �l <\
1121 AGRE51
Fq, I r\ lf.A/ /�IIyI VF"x \Allb ' J
IP.
"- , 1
IDEr AcGGESS/Uf IL Il1Y111 I I I �s
, 'ice/,lilr•/ '!
URA11111C ('ally
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY'C.N S-E' AT
1-BBB-DIG-SANE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION
0 Arm10 6TAMwc 0 ARpAINMY
oA
O'LEARY-BURKE
CIVIL ASSOCIATES, PLC
60LDUC PARCEL
75] AUTUMN HILL RD SOUTH DUKLINGTON. VT
T WAOIMTEowE Y1EI
SKETCH PLAN I 1
RI`// \
I I I
Legend -
����� PROJECT DOUNDARY
PROPERTT LINE
SETDA"
---------- ---------
CONTOUR LINE 1 U5G5 DATUM I
FKOP056D FIN 15H GRADE CONTOUR
0
E%ISTING IRON FIFE
EXISTING CONCRETE MONJMENT
IRON FIFE ITO DE SETI
CONCRETE MONUMENT ITO DE 5ET)
`Ty
VT ILITT POLE
[
E%)STING ELECTKIC.M/TELEPHONE LIFE
5EWM LINE
f
STORMLINE
M
WATERLINE
E%)STING/PROPOSED HYd[ANT
51LT FENCE
Zoning Informatioi
rMCEL DO- 0065--0 2 1*45 AGRE5)
ZONED- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT - NEIGHDORHOOD
KE5IDQRIAL-TRANSITION DEO-W-T • SEO - WM
DaMMIO6ML R6pUMt1lORS-
MINIMUM LOT AREA- I20DO 5F (51NGLE FAMILY)
SC70VILRb
FRONT• X FT 150 FT FROM DOR5ET 5TREETI
SIDE• 10 FT
MAIL- JO FT
DUILD ING COVERAGE- Di MAX
TOTAL LOT COVERA6E- 251 MAX
WATM. M.M161FAL CONEGTION
SEWER M.NICIPAL GONEGTION
STORMVATER ON-51TE
Soil Types
NB VERGENNES CLAY, 2-61 5LOFE5 16n AC.RE5)
VOO VERGENIE5 CLAY, 6-12Z 51-OFE5 U67 ACRE51
CV C.OVINGTON 51LTY CLAY (266 AGRE5)
FiIC FARMIW TON EXTREMELY ROCKY LOAM 5-20Z
I rl�`\\
/I II
I Illllll��
HOME,ftOr/
/ I I SG .LE PURPOSES ONLY (TO \ \ / I I % V#B
I 1 \ \ DE 5ERVED DY MUNICIPAL-'
WA4FV'*, 5EWERI
\ p CLA55 2 WETLAND
h \LOT i2\
-1121 AGRE51
P{ \ PRpPObE01
I W�OEI ACCE55/UtILINYIl11 I I I
Q I LXA5EMlNT IT \LOY1 44 1
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY -DIGSAFETION AT
1-888-DIG-SAFE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVA