Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA0-08-09 - Decision - 0002 0004 Market Street#AO-08-09 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING CENTURY PARTNERS, LP —100 DORSET STREET, 2 & 4 MARKET STREET APPEAL #AO-08-09 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Century Partners, LP, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, is appealing the issuance of Notice of Violation #NV-08-11 for zoning violations at 2&4 Market Street and 100 Dorset Street. The Development Review Board held public hearings on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 and Tuesday, July 1, 2008. Mark Sperry, Esq., represented the appellant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The appellant is appealing the issuance of Notice of Violation #NV-08-11 for zoning violations at 2&4 Market Street and 100 Dorset Street. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Century Partners, LP. 3. The subject property is located in the Central District 1 and Commercial 1-Residential 12 Zoning Districts. 4. On May 5, 2008, the Administrative Officer mailed via Certified Mail, a Notice of Violation #NV-08-11 dated May 2, 2008 to Century Partners, LP informing them of zoning violations at 2 & 4 Market Street and 100 Dorset Street (EXHBIT 1). 5. On May 16, 2008, Century Partners, LP, hereinafter referred to as the "Appellant" filed a Notice of Appeal #AO-08-09 appealing the issuance of the Notice of Violation (EXHIBIT 2). 6. On May 28, 2008, a public hearing notice regarding the appeal was published in Seven Days (EXHIBIT 3). 7. On May 2, 2008, the Administrative Officer conducted a site visit to the 2&4 Market Street and 100 Dorset Street properties and discovered numerous zoning violations. They are as follows: a. The landscaping located between the Dorset Street right-of-way and the row of 35 parking spaces westerly of the Dorset Street building is new and was installed a few years ago without amending the landscaping plan - 1 - #AO-08-09 for the PUD (EXHIBIT 4). A site plan approved by the Planning Commission on 2/4/74 shows a row of trees in this location (EXHIBIT 5). b. A new "service area" for dumpsters has been added to the north side of the 100 Dorset Street building without approval from the Development Review Board (EXHIBIT 6). Suite 21 within the 100 Dorset Street building has been converted from general office use to medical office use for Rushford Family Chiropractic without the necessary approvals and zoning permit. The last three (3) amendments to the PUD for the subject property, SD-05-87, SD-06-61, and SD-07-47 did not include a request for conversion of any general office use to medical office use. All three (3) applications requested the applicant to provide a detailed description of the project including existing and proposed uses (EXHIBITS 7,8,9). As can be seen on all these applications, medical office use was never listed as either an existing or proposed use. The Appellant has indicated that the space occupied by Rushford Chiropractic has been used for medical office use since 5/1/97. This being the case, it appears that the Appellant has provided incorrect information on the last three (3) applications which may invalidate the approvals associated with those applications. d. The landscaping for the area to the east and north of the building at 2 Market Street has been altered from what was approved on 12/10/96 (EXHIBITS 10, 11 & 12). A portion of the approved landscaping plan is shown on EXHIBIT 13. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Section 14.03(A) of the Land Development Regulations requires that site plan approval shall be requested for "any alteration or change to an approved site plan". The discrepancies described in items 4a, 4b & 4d above constitute changes to the approved site plan. Since no site plan approval or any other approval was obtained for the described alterations, the Board concludes that these alterations constitute zoning violations. Section 14.03(A) of the Land Development Regulations requires that "site plan approval shall be required prior to the issuance of a zoning permit ...... for: 1) any new use, change in use, or expansion of use in any district". Section 17.02(A) of the Land Use Regulations provides that no land development may be commenced without a zoning permit, and "land development" includes a change in use of a building. Since Suite 21 at 100 Dorset Street was converted from general office use to medical office use without site plan approval and without a zoning permit, the Board concludes that this change in use constitutes a zoning violation. -2- #AO-08-09 DECISION Motion by h " seconded by , to uphold the decisio of the Administr tive Officer to issue N tice of Violati #NV-08-11. Mark Behr — e(hay/abstain/not present Matthew Birmingham — yea/nay/abstain/ t prese John Dinklage eS%nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley — :a ay/abstain/not t Eric Knudsen — yea/nay/abstain/ of pres f Peter Plumeau — yea/nay/abstain/ p esent Gayle Quimby yea nay/abstain/not present Motion carried by a vote of ! - 0- 0 i Signed this 5 day of 2008, by John Dinklat e, Chair Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRECP 5 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). -3-