Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0437 Lime Kiln Road
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: October 28, 2005 \drb\sit\pg_adams\misc_fill _limekiln.doc Plans received: October 25, 2005 437 LIME KILN ROAD MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION #MS-05-11 Agenda # Meeting date: November 15, 2005 Owner/Applicant Property Information Paul G. Adams Tax Parcel 1034-00437 1215 Airport Parkway Mixed Industrial & Commercial (IC) Zoning South Burlington, VT 05403 District 2.52 acres Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING PROJECT DESCRIPTION ^� Paul G. Adams, hereafter referred to as the applicant„is seeking to *4111� Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on October 25, 2005 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: Table 1. Dimensional Requirements IC Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 40,000 SF xx Max. Building Coverage 40% xx �l Max. Overall Coverage 70% xx �l Max. Front Yard Coverage 30% xx Min. Front Setback 50' xx Min. Side Setback 10, xx Min. Rear Setback 30' xx zoning compliance I�rx4 ab�� tk�s This application shall be reviewed under Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the Development Review Board. The Development Review Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested in connection with the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a resource extraction operation. Standards and Conditions for Approval: (A) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for compliance with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). An application under Section 3.12(A) above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or addition of material. The applicant submitted a plan, containing two (2) sheets showing the placement of the fill on the subject property. The plans depict the existing and proposed contours. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING TON 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING (B) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time. Staff does not feel this requirement is applicable to the subject application. (b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing drainage, and other appropriate measures. The applicant has stated that the area to be filled will be grassed. No buildings or operations are proposed for the filled area. (c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure compliance with the provisions of this Section. Staff does not feel this requirement will be necessary for the subject application. (d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under Section 3.07, Height of Structures. The pre -construction height for future development will be the existing grade. Other The proposed fill is located within the defined 100-year Floodplain Overlay District. According to Section 10.01 (F) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, "no encroachment, including fill, new construction, substantial improvement, or other development that would result in any increase in flood levels within the regulatory floodway during the occurrence of the base flood discharge, shall be permitted. " The applicant should submit a review by a professional hydrologic engineer that discusses the proposed fill's compliance with this criterion. The fill shall only be allowed provided that the applicant can adequately prove that the proposed fill will not cause any increases in flood levels. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING i ON 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (� Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed addition of fill will not impact any of the criteria of Section 14.06, as listed above. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the South Burlington Development Review Board Miscellaneous Plan Application #MS-05-11, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document. Respectfully submitted, Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Paul Adams, applicant 11,'08?2005 14:48 FAX 802 863 41109 PG ADMIS 0001 07 WIP - W Heavy Sending Specialists 1215 Arport Parkway * South Burlington, VT 05403 Voice: B021862-8664 - Fax: 802/863-4709 South Burlingtor Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 We would like to withdraw our site plan application for adding fill to the property at 437 Lime :kiln. Road at this time. Thank You, -j)ley land Paul Adams P.G. Adams, Lm. 1215 Airport. Park -way South Burlington, VT 05403 80'-5/862-8664 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONI' 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 8, 2005 PG Adams Attn: Kristine 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 437 Lime Kiln Road Dear Kristine: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, `� �U-\0,4b Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 1 ) id� ` X -ft-J City of Smith BL-itlirigt;orl L*)l VA WATER DEPARTMENT 403 QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL, 864-4361 October 26, 1990 Mr. John A. Steele Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated One Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 Re: Act 250 Review; Lot 42 Ethan Allen Farms Subdivision, Airport Parkway, South Burlington Dear Mr. Steele: In response to your request as to the capability of the South Burlington water distribution system to supply water to the above referenced project I submit the following: 1. Your estimated demand of 450 gallons per day can be met by the existing water distribution system without encumbering the existing users. Regarding your inquiry on flow and pressure data for hydrant #52, we have no current information available but would be happy to schedule a flow test. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT Tracy Bessette Administrative Assistant cc: J. WeithZ J. Fay -ITY OF SOUTH BURILINGTONJ DE-PAItR.TMENT OF PLAN1',TE'I0 & ZONENG 575 DORSET STREET SOIJTI-± BUIRL.E"JGTON, VERNfONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAY, (802) 846-4101 Permit # K- 0 - 1 APP ICA,TION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one).- ( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation ( ) Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance (Z)•�r PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY'): WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING'? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #): �""M�.dlai■Cm=a IrMIMRAMMM� 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) C;� M onIt j 3) ArPPLICANT �name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mail g address, p�ne & fax # if different from above): ��V1� o a ���� �; - �, �� _" /-,,,,rNA A AA 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:'' 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: i0N 00 4 -3 9 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate L1SP�' B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): C. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): D. Height of building 8, number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): :- (p ok ' ? \k `) - � I k a,`y t s -- U a i a'Sl SI E. Numoer of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): F. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): la -e y-)j 2[AV y ,tiA c Ta nA j (..kt'40 G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE A. Total parcel size: b�l ,� Sq. Ft. B. Buildings: Existing 1 ; % / (1'0 ' $Co Sq. Ft Proposed i `:i ''a % / ( ly , �oj Sq. Ft. C. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / L46, (per Sq. Ft. Proposed j, _%/_(45, 11 _Sq. Ft. D. Total area to be disturbed during construction: Sq. Ft. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES A. Building (including interior renovations): $ B. Landscaping $ C. Other site i 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: L. --_JA. A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 16 B. A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): _iL C. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION k (�e '12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION r -C- 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 14) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (list names and address of all abutting property owners, including those across any street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet of paper if necessary): Q�&Y a'� S�Y� CSnc� I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. r SIG A U O PLICANT 4, -Jed �j SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: / a� REVIEW AUTHORITY: evelopment Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this application and find it to be: L7/COMP ❑ Incomplete ax/� lanning & Zoning or Designee to has been EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (l 1" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible). o Survey data (distance and acreage). o Contours (existing and finished). o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety, and size) as required in Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations. o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. o Zoning boundaries. o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 13.01(b) of the Land Development Regulations). o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 13.01(I) of the Land Development Regulations). o Location of septic tanks (if applicable). o Location of any easements. o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard. o North arrow. o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). o Bicycle rack as required under Section 13.01(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations. o If restaurant is proposed, provide number of seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats. APPLICATION FEE ❑ Appeal of Administrative Officer $ 110.00* ❑ Conditional Use $ 135.00* ❑ Miscellaneous $ 85.00* ❑ Variance $ 135.00* *includes $10.00 recording fee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 November 7, 2005 Stuart Chase Farwater, LTD 444 S. Union Street, Ste 220 Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website lvww.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the November 15, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal for development that abuts your property. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, �64 6�4 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 8, 2005 PG Adams Attn: Kristine 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 437 Lime Kiln Road Dear Kristine: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. vwvk� tlJC S►ZE= 2,5Z p�S (iog,}2 sF) ,�x►ST►rc� Bu�cotrsca 1�,,8op sF►s.3�) 4` 0 7°) PPcRiCb AR1VE', 2a,F�.�c SF �2co.3'7., -MThl I ov 14�f ---------- �„.,tw�� •+arm—'='"_ —. _ -- — -- j - `t---- - r / Qj t1 c� N .. L; I I -.►1— cue LA-6A -10" C!#1d. i f kph r It •� i 24 �Q G,p,l/ltdi'F / hip vso- S' x le° w,r; fosTs RECEIVE® OCT 2 5 2005 City of So. Burlington r r? om ! S�f (ci.iP !�, i FFlM VT *VD', Urn KiL'4 -- so-"m 40 -.u5 SO 260 Fq,c"K y IVED i 2005 3udington Schedule "A" To Proposed Site Plan 437 Lime Kiln Exterior Lighting Detail: RectangubarHtD(1NailMou"O ESeries Sr: d, t. is fi• r��. ,,�.. 7MnhagN hWay DkrWlpa 5�'# D�rn�l tlun Umyi kwmar lo�Wsn {cc fgrirneterCuWit SDM' f3e05• wah - f wwt 3wrp f WNPS 3SD3-7 Mk+ 5Dwt .t Any • -,-- 62 YyWjiIPS .?*,674 wAif3umn . 64 ':t011YdIH'S�SiU4MiYrquaipy i�� wv�tatt faFu•o '; rt�ut>t �� 7Ua+ArI 41Dr it www a 1hN+p+ SWit{ Kt►aawwu4 �Wu9�*N+ �M f�r+0t�S7 7+12DV t,377v 9.?fltV 1.NaV a.a.fv 4.0,al-7p YIU$ rrol:tiv;a+C adeSpwtabt.f lrv.7QWMu.t 7V ODuwrr:nwnt a. qMM� °jwdAft D�ccciplion 3riAAD WIN 368'W1+diru6Nar,Pis fie z77VtufN� 3~r`vo�uu' r+tynrprec�tictw D#tit rt x PSiz arq+ue ulv5lvavd is G�leGelpr�t,ruud 4 yrNtiWMuueatpDttiGahsw� i _. +��IID f>�+wltxWt.MnLW+t§��fNwtnAX tw� ��tt� aarpxgrDdtertt tatenay �''���..w..�F.� lE: Nns his �wtw,trla »iph Mssutrladree eaN. J�euctWttY4W+� IlPe sianAar4 raU>i•M+w Wuasif+e4 SWtµ Keyes, 4tctiarir+t:�NNMtrili2N ,' tley'!'tpttM �ttYtflDlDf CR �: Surtxt alN1 f$H•1 ION ItidtattC4tQlti7techtlgi1ldDwau+cud �'" '.. �s LihM3fi1114�H(d(t GetUW81k1t0 ilYG � ,. : � t� skies Ut fjte tixlute. }tv� wo b 4 L11ikt1,fit+Odlpk.ftDltStilBxltgLttU ' ...• �,. * iD4betwwlfixivim1he£3 $e,�t5 , ;;csareatst7avaliBGhiet �..��" ..-�i I gdflt><j?�,:nlu�i for ttwwrrt r :;,a �a A0� xrn ar. #YIINNwrx uuRouwgtrWAp�►3'. j t�ktYgYUW'a.lbaturtlW.into72��- �'CplbCtten )ltCf�llt°rygrpfp7rwt:; ItUhtputa,tri Dwaylt�t311ffr7 Ux7u<�, An�xC€NEtit �hoks tar tiytatlttestpali parick+>tror 04cateas1wittobu40tags ftimetercutulf Pf4jectIunCutoff 1 niiP ,ta°mQunStr,gt,eigiq. low WS,IC'ttttuMOOtielgtrt IMN Q,1,0 - Itl' w 40, W ' , * 1Y o p MINOR CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY In accordance with Sectio �20 of the oning Regulations the premises located at 16 a ���% IW'�Lt%4 having been completed % in Zoning Permit No. 05 may now be used for �4 Temporary Certificate valid46r p (;- Au44,S la P(AO APPRDVAU as per s//pecciifications outlined sated _&,,,,/ � _ g//o occupancy. L i 9� � days. Zoning Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 August 12, 1998 Paul Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Site & Landscaping Alterations, 1890 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Adams: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the City Planner on August 7, 1998. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. JW/mcp I Encl ZONING t802)658-7958 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailin address, phone and fax #) 1a1i5 t a 2- _ 61 2) APPLICANT (Name mailing address, phone and fax #) ad u�-C da&j ais C&± rx rt- 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) ; I�Q6 Cciaoto, 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:i� 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) /d — Z"J0 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) A /1/WL 0 _ /)ten - . b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) a : �-c.L e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed �/4- % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed t4 0- % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed c, % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ im A- 6) Pi'4 .t b) Landscaping: $ jj, c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): CL�fMc:& b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): 4VO CIVA(A-), c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): Wo - _ IL, 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATUR OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: %D REVIEW AUTHORITY: Planning Commission City Planner I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be- 0 Complete 4, Cit (Apfrmsp) Incomplete © �� % )/e�� l x_ - - Planner or Designee EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. • Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) • Survey data (distance and acreage) • Contours (existing and finished) • Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations • Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping • Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways • Zoning boundaries • Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) • Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) • Location of septic tanks (if applicable) • Location of any easements • Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard • North arrow • Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date • Exterior lighting details (must be down casting and shielded) • Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) • Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations • If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE 0 New Application $ 50.00 Amendment $ 25.00 (Apfrmsp) SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY PLANNER The following site plan applications will be reviewed by the South Burlington City Planner as authorized under Section 26.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The City Planner shall issue a decision no sooner than two (2) days from the date of this notice. A decision of the City Planner may be appealed by an interested party to the Planning Commission within 15 days of the Planner's decision. Notice of an appeal shall comply with the provisions of 24 VSA, Section 4465. 1. Site plan application of Paul Adams to amend a previously approved plan for a 16,600 square foot wholesale/warehouse/distribution building, 1890 Airport Parkway. The amendment consists of modifications to landscaping, and adding outdoor storage and screened dumpster areas. Site Plan applications may be reviewed at the Planning Department offices, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont, 05403. July 9, 1998 (Spcp) P.G. Ate, Imo. 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Phone: (802) 862-8664 Fax: (802) 863-4709 July 6, 1998 Dick Ward Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St., South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Ward, This letter is to inform you that the commercial rental space at 1890 Airport Parkway is fully occupied. The tenants, contact person and telephone follow: Carts Vermont - Terry Wilson, 862-6304 Resource Recovery - Kevin DelMastro, 878-3500 Frito-Lay - Dennis Connell, (518) 783-9026 Sincerely, �/ J Paul Adams CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone I' / 6, '4110011limeT i9/2�ijtJ/9� V`� , JrJ�2�l /i✓lo To� (%% 4t-5L54/03 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #),�y��iC/�/•y �cESc��Ti�c��O 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) _ #'`/� �%f-1,Qr✓ r4Gli✓ s�j412i'Y�� 6) PROPOSED USE (S) G� ✓d�•�0 �.15� �t` LSTOi2 loE �i�sl t- / 7 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) yw 57/A)G eel k 411,0G /Z, G j9.0 S. `, - 6/d0)'00.560 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES tv �Or.4,{ 9) LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas"�8 % building, parking, outside storage % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ /UD Coo Landscaping $ %O, ODO Other Site Improvements (please list with cost') $ SD, O D D 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: e1%0A-)j5 / %9 6 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 12�2. Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon / 12-1p.m. ' ; 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. ; 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Tea - •'o O �OrYi 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: A*`�"��f % SW 7-0�ZvO V � DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING ICNATURE OF APPLICANT PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (11 X 17) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible). Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to or greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 181) with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (see Table 26-1 of zoning regulations). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking, and outside storage, landscaped areas and front yard. Location of site (street # and lot #). North arrow Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 August 8, 1991 Paul Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Warehouse Building, Lot 42, Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Adams: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the July 23, 1991 Planning Commission minutes. Please note the conditions of approval which must be met prior to obtaining a permit. Please call if you have any questions. S:i ce e y, 1 uU WC1-L.11, Ciry Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: John Steele 7/23/91 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Paul Adams of P.G. Adams, Inc., for construction of a 12,000 square foot building for wholesale, warehouse, distribution use as depicted on a 5 page set of plans, page one entitled "Ethan Allen Farms, Lot 42, South Burlington, Vermont, Site and Utili- ties Plan, "prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., and dated August 1990, last revised 7/16/91, with the following stipula- tions: 1. This approval is conditioned on the granting of a setback variance by the Zoning Board of Adjustment. 2. The applicant shall post prior to permit a $7,200, 3-year landscaping bond. The landscape plan shall be revised prior to permit to show the second hydrant removed. 3. The applicant shall contribute $880 toward long range im- provements to the Airport Parkway/Ethan Allen Drive/Shamrock Road intersection. This fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 4. All lighting shall be downcasting, shielded luminaire and shall not cast light beyond the property line. 5. The gravel parking lot shall not be paved without prior ap- proval by the Planning Commission. Impacts of runoff shall be addressed if paving is proposed. 6. Two full sets of the revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit. 7. The zoning/building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. i City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 July 19, 1991 Mr. John Steele Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates One Wentworth Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Warehouse Building, Lot 42, Airport Parkway Dear John: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 23, 1991 at 8:30 P.M. to represent your request. S' cerely, C i1[L Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW//mcp cc: Paul Adams MEMORAEDUM T-: South Bi_ir? ingt.on Planni.na (7-=i ,;,n Prom: Joe Wei th . r'i ty P1 .annAr Re: July 23, 1991 agenda items Date: July 19, 1991 ** JOINT DISCUSSION WITH CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF INTERIM ZONING WILL BEGIN AT 7:30 P.M. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 8:30 P.M. FOLLOWING THE DISCUSSION ** Enclosed is a memo from Chuck Hafter to the Council regarding SEQ Zoning. 2) PAUL ADA S• LOT 42 As discussed at the last meeting, this application received Planning Commission approval on October 16, 1990 (minutes en- closed). The applicant failed to obtain a zoning permit within the 6 month time frame, and therefore the approval expired. The applicant is resubmitting the application for a new approval. All of the conditions contained in the approval have been met. The only change proposed is to delete one of two proposed fire hydrants. This is acceptable to the Fire Chief (see enclosed memo). Setbacks: Since the 10/16/90 approval, the zoning of the adjoin- ing parcel to the north owned by Ray Unsworth was changed to Residential 4. Section 19.104(c) of the zoning regulations requires a 65 foot setback for commercial uses from residential zones. The proposed building is only 15 feet from the residen- tial zone. This plan can be approved only with a setback vari- ance granted by the Zoning Board. I do not believe it will be difficult to obtain a variance. Due to the topography of the site (i.e. very steep bank), it would be extremely difficult to construct a building within the 65 foot setback and other setback requirements. Additionally, an old quarry exists between the applicant's property and the developa- ble area on the Unsworth property. Therefore, the proposed building location would not negatively impact a residential development. 1 Memorandum - Planning July 23, 1991 agenda items July 19, 1991 Page 2 I recommend that the Planning Commission approve the application subject to the granting of a setback variance by the Zoning Board. 3) SONNY AUDETTE, CAPITAL PLAN Enclosed is the Street Department's 5 year construction plan Capital Plan as approved by the council last spring. Sonny Audette will be present at the meeting to discuss the plan and answer questions. Sonny and I have been talking over the last few months about presenting the plan to the Commission so that the Commission is informed of the time line for certain roadway improvements. This will be an opportunity for the Commission to discuss proposed improvements to the Route 116/Kennedy Drive and Route 116/Williston Road intersection. 3) SEWER ALLOCATION POLICY Enclosed is the City's sewer allocation policy. A couple of weeks ago, the Commission decided to review the policy and consider revising the policy to allow the exchange of allotments for reserved sewer capacity between separate lots. This review of the policy was initiated by Lochmore Associates regarding Lakewood Commons development. Enclosed is a letter from Charles Brush of Lochmore Associates, Inc. addressing this issue. Background Staff conducted research into the background of the sewer alloca- tion policy. It appears that the policy was first adopted by the Commission in August, 1978 and revised in January, 1983. The policy was never officially adopted by the Council, therefore, it is a Planning Commission policy. The City has a separate sewer ordinance which was officially adopted by the City Council in 1969 and last amended in June, 1980. The sewer ordinance does not address allocation of reserve capacity. 1 �Ult�� �UTjC1t��IIIt �YIC ��}��L`�IIi�Dt� 5751 +igurset ttreet �nntb +-,6nrlingtnn. Vermont 054113 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: LOT 42 ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE DEVELOPMENT DATE: TUESDAY JULY 16,1991 ON TUESDAY JULY I HAD A MEETING WITH MR. JOHN STEELE FROM FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN'S OFFICE. MR STEELE HAD NEW INFORMATION ON HYDRANT LOCATIONS FOR THE PAUL ADAMS PROJECT LOT 42 ETHAN ALLEN FARM DEVELOPMENT. AT THIS TIME AFTER REVIEWING THE PLAN WITH THE INFORMATION MR. STEELE HAS ONLY ONE HYDRANT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. r- 802) 658 7960 he 1\I11II x N/F RAY UNS WORTH 1000 GALLON CO CRETE �N K1�111'1111 _84'2210" • ■• ON ON --- - -- u1 '�• SEP77C TANK \ 1 ._�■` 149. NOT PART OF THIS CONTRACT, ..��... r•- I � till>t.,l 1 I N SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE ,x6' ti � 85'S340' E PURPOSES ONLY yeog .—....��..� 6.34�_ i +' L it'I tl _ __ - --'-- - _,(��o■��'..r- -- ; III I�I iI II ' S 1H USTOA B W TON 761 260 -- `��"1 o. m 59 10' GRAI EL 251.2 ROPO�E•:D BUl .DING zsso E X 200• 25,. _ _, 2 J O - _ ,y,; i ,, / ,) o LOCUS 25s6� 12 OVC E zss \�P A SLEEVE ,os 0 5' LOADING DOCKSASPHALT CONCR�7E I --- 7OWDED FOR BAYS / ;/%; �" ! %:'%i �/ �• V GRAVEL ar ,os �r BOX- ar `.\ 4'LOADING DOCK S ----- zaa� / ,i o:�.i�� is j�i'�i%jj'%:i' BOX- - PRONDED FOR BAYS a ni i1�'//�/-, j :�/// i %iPARKING/ROADWAY LIGHTS 175 ATT INV /N 2532 CON CR TE SIDEWALK 1 IHROUCH 6 - �, i/'i cez'^ `ij %'/� % ' G / _//i5i / /����: ; i ! ,' METAL HALIDE TYPE FM RECTANGULAR �'� ' %� �. /'%' i : i/ ONE WAY CUTOFF LUM/NAIRE C 20' • "" 1NV OUT 253.0� \ // �' /''� . '- �/jai':%4g%%.'%' / i�/�i�/ �' % SQUARE STEEL POLE, BLACK l • RETAINING WALL ANODIZED FINISH. GARDCO �H- G, 9YaTRfR9 /i i' \ -- %9`// ':z4y� i".r' 14-1-FM-120-175MH-BLA zss• r -- 0 ' i ��_��asi - _i s4o ;,, :�35 /�i 'i OR EQUAL • tu• . 25t _ 10'zae6 yy31 —1fls, Asa sq. Fr. • p■ N I I ,n, ---- ,� o GRAVEL''�� i%�'i:_'�ji��� 2.52 Acres io PRIMAI Y I I �/� ar ro� / ," _ i/ / / - -----' ��,__''-' �:� -'��� :-i'' '' -- �■..ter AREAOSAL Z-O' TO CENTER : / i�� / % i'i i_ i ', •i i / ■�■/■■` 8 x8" WOOD POSTS 6'-3" O.C. W/ STEEL �� ---- -25J a BEAM GUARDRAILS y3° SEE DETAIL SHEET 30F5 ABANDONED CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND SLAB LEGEND B X8' TAPPING - SLEEVE & VAL ■UOOMe■■� PER/METER PROPERTY LINE --- ---- RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENT LINE ---------------- L-XIS77NG CONTOUR - PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTING FENCE LINE GATE VALVE un,v -0HW— EX/S77NC OVERHEAD WIRfIZ/TILITY POCIZ BUILDING SETBACK LINE I ECr PROPOSED BUILDING Yrr PROPOSED GUARDRAIL • � IRON PIN TO POLE BE SET Unary Unary J U L 16 1991 ►• WATER VALVE IF PROPOSED L16HT City of So. Burlington Y. •'� EX/SIlNG LIGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED NOT PART OF THIS CONTRACT, SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY NOTES 1. Owner / Applicant: Paul G. Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont, 05403 2. Lot Area: 2.52 Acres J. Lot coverages: Building :12,000 sq.ft. 10.9X Parking :29,9/J sq.ft. 27.2X Green Area:67,886 sq.ft. 61.8X Total Lot Coverage :41,913 sq.ft. J8.2X 4. Perimeter property line information from plan entitled "Ethan Allen Forms Industrial Subdivision - Overall Site Plan' by Fitzpatrick Llewellyn Incorporated. Lost revised date 14 October 1988. 5. Topographic Information and existing features by FitzPatrick-LlewellM Incorporated, surveyed during topographic survey June 1990 6. The presence of utility lines on site indicate the presence of a utility easement, no research was performed by this office. 6. 26 Total Parking Spaces; 26 spaces required by Planning Commission, GRAPHIC SCALE I IN FEET I 1 Inch - 20 }t. PA _ AUTO -BODY '"G ETHAN ALLEN FARMS EXIST? O LO T 42 SHOP � N/F FRANK NAEF, RANDY VOLK - - - - - - - --- -- - _ SITE AND UTILITIES PLAN �I II __ RELOCATE PARKING ENTRANCE 7Jj�/��n jVj o 90064E" PROVIDE PAVED APRON TO EDGE �✓ �( �J [� W W - o„ OF APPROVED GRAVEL. BASED ON LL �� p ���nn AUG 1990 APPROVED NAEF, VOLKs-i, PROPERTY W w REMOVE AND REGRADf EXISTING I ` PARKING ENTRANCE 5/TP PLAN SHEET S-1, 1-17-90 INCORPORATED SLM rN—IIING ANO PLANNING s—ces D 3493 IA9LLISTON VERMONTIL City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 July 16, 1991 Mr. Paul Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Lot #42, Ethan Allen Farms, Industrial Building Dear Mr. Adams: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from Fire Chief Goddette. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S"n erely, oe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW//mcp cc: John Steele City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 July 15, 1991 Paul Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Lot 42, Ethan Allen Farms, Industrial Building Dear Mr. Adams: Enclosed are my preliminary comments on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S' cerely, oe Weith, City Planner Encl JW/mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: Project File From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: Preliminary Comments, July 30, 1991 agenda items Date: July, 1991 CHITTENDEN BANK DRIVE-THRU RECONSIDERATION. 508 SHELBURNE ROAD The purpose of this item is for the Commission to decide whether conditions have substantially changed to justify a rehearing of the application. -- the proposed modification will result in a handicapped space being converted to a regular space and two (2) parallel parking spaces will be lost. --- traffic exiting the drive-thru will re-enter the flow of traffic in close proximity to a relatively busy four-way inter- section. The proposed modifications do not improve this situa- tion. This situation will get worse if and when O'Dell Parkway is connected through to Farrell Drive. WITHERS 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - 265 KIRBY ROAD - PRELIMINARY PLAT Additional information required on preliminary plat: --- address of record owners. --- contour lines at intervals of five (5) feet based on USGS datum of existing grades. Other: --- the house at #261 Kirby Road is quite close to the proposed access drive to lot #2. The applicant should plant a row of evergreen trees between the access drive and the westerly bound- ary of lots #1 and #2 to screen the access drive from the house at #261 and houses on Picard Circle. These trees should be at least 4-5 feet tall. PA L ADAMS a WAREHOUSE -AIRPORT PARKWAY - REAPPROVAL --- plans comply with requirements of October 16, 1990 approval. 1 f CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1 OWNE OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) 2 f Azj'e--)� <'�� ;?, -4, X, I -�"// 01 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone/%#/)_ " 57 / // l t i7 %� / L// 2 A's je 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: No AW B V/e 7-56' S."P 9) LOT COVERAGE: building �B%; landscaped areas % building, parking, outside storage3VtZ-% 1 U ) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $_Z 061Z9 , Landscaping $ �a O Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $� �, �� 0 I-C, Cad 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:-�A j/ 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) _x-,!5A Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION : 4-- SU13MISSION OF APPLICANT DATE OF SIGNATURE DATE OF HEARING PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (11 X 1.7) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible.) Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. (This requires sepa- rate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot U . North arrow Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. �A CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: a) Owner of Record Paul Adams, P.G. Adams Inc. 1215 Airport Parkway, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 b) Applicant Paul Adams,:P.G. Adams Inc. 1215 Airport Parkway, .South Burlington, Vermont 05403 c) Contact Person FitzParick-Llewellyn Incorporated, John Steele 878-3000 Michael Dugan, Architect 878-0070 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Lot 42 Airport Parkway 3) PROPOSED USE (s) Wholesale, Storage and distribution, warehousing in "mixed industrial and Commercial District" (IC) 4) SIZE OF PROJECT: (i.e. Building Square Footage, #units, maximum parcel area: 109,798 sq.ft. height and #floors 122000 sq.ft. 8 units, 30 feet high, one floor 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full and part time) : 24, (29 parking spaces) 6) LOT COVERAGE: Building 10.9 %; Building, Parking, Outside Storage: 38.2 % 8) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings: $ 240,000 ; Landscaping $ 39.60 Other Site Improvements: (Please list with cost) $ Paved entrance __road (10,000) graveled parking ($15,000) Guard rail ($3,500) Lighting ($4,500) 9) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 1991 10) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 84 AWVTE 11) PEAK HOUR(s) OF OPERATION: Sam to 5pm ; am peak - 20 VTE�pm peak-12 VTE 12) PEAK DAY (s) OF OPERATION: Mondav -Fridav SIGNATURE OF APPLICA T State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT AMENDMENT CASE NO 4C0643-12 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT Paul Adams 10 V.S.A., CHAPTER 151 ADDRESS P.G. Adams, Incorporated (Act 250) 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, VT 05403 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0643-12, pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 270, Page 359, of the land records of the Town of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Paul Adams, the "Permittee" as "grantee". This permit specifically authorizes the Permittee to construct a 60' x 2001, single story, preengineered industrial building, 26 vehicle parking spaces, 300' long access drive off of Airport Parkway, on -site septic system, water line extension and other related on -site improvements as approved herein. This project is located on a 2.5 acre parcel of land identified as Lot #42 of the previously permitted 21 lot subdivision off of Ethan Allen Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. The Permittee, and its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate, and maintain the pro- ject as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All the conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0643 and its amendments are in full force and effect, except as amended herein. 2. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained as set forth in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Ap- proved" and on file with the District Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. Page 2 Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0643-12 3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing juris- diction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accor- dance with the terms of the permit. 4. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittee confirms and agrees for himself and all assigns and successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and all as- signs and successors in interest. 5. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by this permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. 6. The project is approved for the following maximum cumulative impacts: 26 vehicle parking spaces; 450 gallons per day of water and wastewater; 84 vehicle trips per day; 20 a.m. peak hour vehicle trips; 12 p.m. peak hour vehicle trips; 7. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit #WW-4-0380 issued on April 29, 1991 by the Regional Engineer, Division of Pro- tection, Department of Environmental Conservation, Agency of Natural Resources. 8. The Permittee shall apply and maintain water and/or calcium chloride on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. 9. The building approved herein is not approved for any manufac- turing use or the on -site disposal of any process wastes. The Permittee shall apply and receive approval for any change in the use of the building which involves the storage or handling of any regulated substances or the generation of hazardous wastes. 10. The installation of floor drains is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. Page 3 Land Use Permit Amendment #4CO643-12 11. The Permittee shall apply to the District Environmental Commis- sion for approval for any change in the use of the building and land which would cause noxious or unhealthy emissions into the air or injection of toxic wastes into the soils. 12. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall install and maintain water conserving plumbing fixtures. The plumbing fixtures shall operate with the following specifica- tions: (1) internal system water pressure of 50 psi maximum, (2) toilets with a maximum of 3.5 gallons per flush, (3) showerheads operating with a maximum of 3 gallons per minute, and (4) faucets on sinks and lays shall operate at a maximum of 3 gallons per minute. An alternative water conservation plan may be presented to the Commission for approval before implementation. The ap- proved alternate shall be implemented and maintained by the Permittee for the duration of the permit. 13. The Permittee shall comply with Exhibits #8, and #23 - #27 for erosion control. Hay bale dams and silt fences shall be installed as depicted on the plans prior to commencement of construction. The Permittee shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. All disturbed areas of the construction site shall be stabilized, seeded and mulched within 1 to 14 days of initial disturbance, and prior to October 1, to ensure proper stabilization of disturbed soils. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as they deem necessary. 14. Prior to commencement of construction, the Permittee shall have a professional engineer, or other qualified person certify that the erosion control plan contains site specific erosion control mea- sures necessary to provide a level of protection at least equiva- lent to the procedures outline in the "Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites." 15. The Permittee shall incorporate all erosion controls set forth in the above stated Conditions 15 and 16 in the contract documents for site work and shall submit a copy to the District Environmental Commission prior to commencement of any site work. 16. In addition to conformance with the requirements of conditions #15 - #17 the Permittee shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste materials into any surface waters. Compliance Page 4 Land Use Permit Amendment #4CO643-12 with the requirements of this Permittee from compliance wit h 17. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall continually maintain the landscaping as approved in Exhibit #27 by replacing any dead or diseased plantings as soon as seasonably possible. 18. Prior to any site work, the Permittee shall install and maintain snow fencing a minimum of 5 feet outside the dripline and around the tree line to be retained as depicted on Exhibit #27. 19. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those approved in Exhibits #8, #19, #21, #23 and #27, and shall be mounted no higher than 20 feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 20. Exterior signs shall be limited to the one 8 ft. high, externally illuminated, freestanding sign and the one 10 sq. ft. wall mounted sign located and installed as approved in Exhibits #8, #23 and #27. 21. The installation of interior lighting is limited to high - intensity discharge lamps of either metal halide or high- pressure sodium lamps. 22. The water heaters shall have a 10 gallon capacity heated with electric heat. 23. This heated structure approved herein shall be constructed with insulation with an R Value of at least R-19 in the interior ceiling and walls, and exterior ceiling, and at least R-10 around the foundation or slab. 24. The installation and or use of electric resistance space heating is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 25. The installation of roof -top heating and ventilation units is strictly prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Commission. Page 5 Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0643-12 26. Each prospective purchaser of this parcel of land shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan, Subdivision Permit, Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit and the Land Use Permit before any written contract of sale is entered into. 27. No further subdivision and/or development of this parcel of land beyond that approved herein shall be permitted without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 28. All construction on this project must be completed by October 15, 1992. 29. This permit shall expire on February 20, 2011 unless extended by the District Commission. Notwithstanding, this permit shall expire one year from date of issuance if the Permittee has not demonstrated an intention to proceed with the project. In any event, substantial construction must occur within two years of the issuance date. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 6090(b). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this -(~ day of May, 1991. Louis Borie District #4 Coordinator By Jol^ Collins, Chairman Dis rict #4 Commission Commissioners participating in this decision: Patricia Tivnan EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION # 4CO643-12 Page 1 E D R E A=APPLICANT X A E N T=TOWN H T C T TPC=TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION I E E E RPC=REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION B I R AEC=AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION I V E AOT=AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION T E D DPS=DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE D ANR=AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES N B VDH=VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH O. Y NATURE OF EXHIBIT DATE ENTERED 1 02/06/91 A Land Use Permit Application (01/25/91) 2 11Schedule A - Fee Information 3 ofWater Supply & Wastewater Disposal Application (01/25/91) 4 Schedule E - Adjoiner Information 5 Schedule F - Certification of Service (02/06/91) 6 Municipal Impact nuestionnaire (11/02/90) 7 Location Maps (2) 8 Schedule B - Act 250 10 Criteria Information 9 Letter by Everett Marshall, Nonqame & Natural Heritage Program (11/13/90) 10 Letter by Eric Gilbertson, Director Division for Historic Preservation (01/29/91) 11 Letter by John Vergin, Burlington Regional Office, Dept. of Labor & Industry (12/26/90) 12 Letter by Louis Fonte, GMP Corp. (12/27/90) 13 Letter by Michael Poirier, Manager, Vermont Gas (12/27/90) 14 Letter by Gary Sundberq, New England Telephone (12/03/90) 15 Letter by James Fay, Operations Manager, Champlain Water District (10/30/90) 16 Letter by South Burlington Water Department (10/26/90) 17 Letter by South Burlington Fire Department (11/09/90) 18 Letter by South Burlington Police Department (11/12/90) 19 Lighting Information EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION # 4CO643-12 Paae 2 E D R E A=APPLICANT X A E N T=TOWN H T C T TPC=TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION I E E E RPC=REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION B I R AEC=AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION I V E AOT=AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION T E D DPS=DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE D ANR=AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES N B VDH=VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH O. Y NATURE OF EXHIBIT DATE ENTERED 20 02/06/91 A Sign Information 21 it Plan: Building Elevations A-2 (11/22/90) 22 Plan: Floor Plan A-1 (11/22/90) 23 Plan: Site and utilities plan, sheet 1 of 5 (08/90) 24 Plan: Details, sheet 2 of 5 (08/90) 25 Plan: Details and Specifications, sheet 3 of 5 (10/90) 26 Plan: Erosion Control Plan, sheet 4 of 5 (10/90) 27 Plan: Landscape Plan, sheet 5 of 5 (08/90) 28 02/13/91 Plan: Site and Utilities, sheet 1 of 5 (08/90, revised) 'i ? CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Louis Borir, District #4 Ij Coordinator of the Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing LAND USE PERMIT AMENDMENT #4C0643-12 by U. S. Mail, postage paid, on this 9th day of May, 1991 to the �j following: 1 Paul Adams P. G. Adams, Inc. 1215 Airport Parkway So. Burlington, VT 05403 John Steele Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 it Margaret Picard, City Clerk Chairperson, Board of Selectmen Chairperson, City Planning Commission Joe Weith, City Planner City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 j Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission P. O. Box 108 i Essex Junction, VT 05453 Kurt Janson, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street - 2 Center Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission John Collins Patricia Tivnan 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Ernie Christianson, Regional Engineer ANR, 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Donna Chandler VT Department of Health 60 Main Street Burlington, VT 05401 Dated at Essex Junction, VT, this 9th day of May, 1991. BY: 'An" 6K�.1► Louis Borie Nc District #4 Coordinator 4C064312/#2 PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 December 3, 1990 Paul Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Lot 42, Ethan Allen Farms, Industrial Building Dear Mr. Adams: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact & Decision on the above referenced project. Please note any conditions which are part of this decision. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincezely, Raym23 J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant cc: John Steele RJB/mcp E YAP �Du,�o — �%� 4 xk pl-"4 lyle*�L 3 36c> ") �.2 5- rlo 4i JIB ? 0, '/a3%8`l ,1 �;�' ao� .A 9 ,ram �'� : /�co``� .� ��' ����". ��' City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 29, 1990 Mr. John Steele Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates One Went -worth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: 3-Lot. Subdivision, Airport Parkway Dear John: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the October 2, 1990 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please call if you have any questions. u , Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl cc: Paul Adams JW/mcp C, 1000 GALLON CONCR£ SEPTIC TANK / it =<. 70' � O zs+e Z 1?' DL iRON SLEE ASPHALT, �•. CONCRETE b ,� \ GRAVEL ti,j� DISTRIBUTION -4'' c' `� + 4' LOADI BOX- CR / PROND£D INV IN 15J.2 �I\ CON7£ SIDEWALK 1 IHROU INV OUT 253.0 i \ It ,os GR' Y AVEL. �■ I I , I (j ` `_ `\ , hh PRIMA DISPOSAL / AREA i I 18 LINES INDICATE LOCATION , E,. OF PROPOSED PAINTED STRIPING IF AREA i } I BECOMES PAVED (TYP. "/l it I I {•� REPLACEMENT DISPOSAL AREA - I-- �- -- I L._1 TRUCK TURN -AR ND \ s �y6 � .. ,/fie• •' I�,e ,// -a`/� ,, � ,'� ABANDONED CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND SLAB LEGEND �••��■•� PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE ---- RIGHT- OF- WAY/£ASEMEN T LINE ------- --------- EX/STING CONTOUR --- ---- PROPOSED CONTOUR ---------- EA7S17NG FENCE LINE ----� r HW— EXIS77NC OVERHEAD W1RE/UT7LITY POLE -- - - - - - — BUILDING SETBACK LINE PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED GUARDRAIL • IRON PIN TO BE S£r UTILITY POLE M WATER VAL VE F PROPOSED LIGHT - 4--- ------ � --- l sv::: TE N/F RAY UNSWOR7H-'-_----_ _ _- __- - _ 5' MINIMUM '�� '11\11'lli\� _= 10� -- 'SETBACK .' v-,1\" \� �11r\ 1��\,�1 \T\•.��•• 149.72 :.� 3140-r~ 'E"...��--�""•-�.—.. -_�". / 1;ui'li ;' II' i�i\ - - - - - - - - Jill it 11/1/Irl/I n rm i' GRA�£C ROPO�ED BU DING Rl Pikm ios �•z.5' / LOADING DOCK 0VIDED FOR BAYS _----- 7 TROUGH 10 NG DOCKS s / fOR BAYS METAL HALIDE £ FM RfCTPARKING/J?OADWAY LICH G A n 1,7 WATT IULAR ONE WAY CU T(LUMINA/Rf C1}J 20' • SQUARE STEEL POLE, BUCK I • ANODI RETAINING WALL ZED FIN / ISH. GARDCO FH- / 14-1-FM1720-175MH-BLA -'/o' jh5. :ice' / OR EQUAL l� l AREA = 1o9 79B Sq. FtOIGsF/` 2.52 Acres - 2-0- TO CENTER ....... POST (TIP.) �.'�/� /�/%/ ,i %� � ' '/ ' - I � � ,.a .._... _�.•�-• par. e / / / /i//. _ .'� «,'►-' C ��.��+��Y.�� ' , , i ,,,, //,,/%,, ,.-�- _ -• NOTES '14-41' N/F JOHN BEL TER Owner E •• 1. OA 1/cant: Pau/ G. Adams 79�� % / PP N ��•• // 1215 Airport Porkwoy i// y ?i�iy/ / / �' �'.// •�••_-516'O5_,+,.- i South Burlington, Vermont, 05403 -` J / �%,'i�'''���YY /�/ „/•-`•- ti g(�.(�' �j►�) 7,�� S-�" 2Lot Area: 2.52 Acres '-60 ;/ i 4 1.1 a... '�-G' k/1 J. Lot coverages: Building : 12,000 sq.lt. 10.9x EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE Parking :29,913 sq.fV 27.2T REMOVED OR RELOCATED Green Areo:67,886 sq.R. 61.8X -12" ASH TO BE REMOVED Total Lot Coverage :41,913 sq.lt. J8.2Z 4. Perimeter property line information from plan entitled Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision -Overall Site Plan* by Fitzpatrick LJewell)n Incorporated. Lost revised dote 14 October 1988, j9 5. Topographic information and existing features by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn 8'x8' WOOD POSTS hf' ,gyp Incorporated, surveyed during topographic survey June 1990. 6'-J' O.C. W/ STEEL + BEAM GUARDRAILS I / 261 -----" 6. The presence of utility lines on site indicate the presence of o SEE DETAIL SHEET ! _ zee--____ __ __ _- -- utility easement, no research was performed by this office. -- — I 6. 29 Total Parking Spaces; 28 spaces repaired. .7jtl,,/ 6 xB' TAPPING 1 '" PROPOSED ASPHALT ACCESS ROAD SLEEVE & VAtV£� ` ; Q,' �I , \ 25e--- I '-`� 2 GRAPHIC SCALE I j RK/ G W reel 1 I -ua-- o'e - 20 n. GATE VALVE / - _ I PA ,NG ETHAN ALLEN FARMS EXISTING LOT 42 /� Aura -Boor Q i N/F FRANK NA£F, SWM BJP{mG10N vt'pvovr L O I �� iSHOP i RANDY VOLK I n - -, - y - ----------J L SITE AND UTILITIES PLAN EXISTINGFENCE WOOD I - - - -_-- I REMOVE WESTERL Y PORTION i f O RELOCATE PARKING ENTRANCE I �t PROVIDE PAVED APRON 70 EDGE JEuIP2%un 90064 `OF EXIS71NG GRAVEL. BASED DIV AUC 1990 i r \• REMOVE AND W£CRADE EXISTING APPROVED NAEF, VOLKS-7, PROPERTY L�� qL v, SITE PLAN SHE£r S-i, 1-17-90 SLM PARKING EN7I�ANCE �Yoan.rl'1--. I INCORPORATED • ..c ..rl •e= wc,.u.�.c r.,,,.«+c v.»as D 3493 3 WI-LISTON VERMONT i 1 a" 3 261 a 260 c' i r 3 LEGEND O IRON PIPE g UTILITY POLE WATER LINE GATE VALVE TY - HYDRANT — X X X — EXISTING FENCE LINE EXISTING WATER MAIN atlw EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE LOCATION -- --' -- EASEMENT BUILDING SETBACK LINE �--.-++--. PROPOSED GUARDRAIL - -- - - EXISTING CONTOUR Q EXISTING TREE � I o P P I EXISIIN I PAasMPO�S/�L I I I I +I 1 I 161 MARK OTY. BOTTANICAL NAME COMMON MANE SIZE ROOT COMMENTS ® 7 ACER SACCHARUM SUGAR MAPLE 2 1/2' CAL (MIN.) BB 6' TO LOWEST BRANCH ® 11 PINUS STRUBUS WHITE PINE 4' HEIGHT (MIN.) BB Q PLANT LIST JAN0 6 1995 City of So. Burlington .•��, BesJlc // GIs S S E 3° \� erarrzT r I i �a I LOCATION MAP N N 1►r $ N.T.S. 1 \ IRON PIPE N/F RAY UNSWORTH I FOUND ( --8 -22 T_-------__ / ' 436.34' _ C N 6340 E 35 I I \ 199.9' EXISTING PRE-ENGINEERED BUILDING g � 1 ' ss / 10•: WIDE BERM. TYP. GRAVEL LOADING �/ // a Rt / STAKED HAYB S / / ' AREA. TYP./� PRELIMINARY 20' PERMENAFORCENT SAMAINNITARY J E E �1+ NOT FOR cOPISTRUCTION E RESERVE FOR / / / � � / DATE 1 ENT DISPOSAL AREA // 1. —W D..dblkn: '� (\ / f — cors1m1c11w or A 4,eoD sr. trA.ulDasc NXIITDN. Im r1. a a n..�. (2) Pa.. t1...rty r.w+4...t 1.rt1. by a< 05' p� - vAUD a .D.us ij 10' SPIKE + - I SET h EXISRNG 1000 CAL CONCRETE / / O. i W OMW �i /' / DoDW '� Tab B X B' WOOD POSTS 6'-3' O.C. W/STEEL BEAM GUARDRAILS C-"\ SITE PLAN SCALE 1" = 20' Graphic Scale feet 20 0 20 40 60 BO P G .DNR. MC. snulk a G— n aa4o3 (eat) m2-eee4 Prultl 4M»• - 1 .o.gldn Cwr.mp Fny...�. 2a P...� I>a.e. v.o. D544e c..moc ea.eom.. ( ) ees-eoeo m61k NDIM (1)pbn Y .o. tgwpmnk 1./Pm� mIY vb Y rol tP lro r.4 prop.rly lwMvy _r —I— y Iwe. sw mPa111. m Y J.daO m a m.r..mwo4 P.P�tY �Y •may (2) N .r etlm..n..P m 1n1. Mm on 1-1m m —1e�e.b. _ m. not u._ 0)fy v.v m .ro d1...... tM wd aanl.xtar r.a . �~F+.wl_y — NMiW lwl...~i VuFd d— and adW IYa —I.. 4) 1n. �a c.Pt.at> .ndi .mm�t IMG sAv .t 1-eoo-225-4D77) my I— to Paw�rvt.Y ..td41w t1ro l.wtl.n of dl ubwglolmE IBkbs IPc.t.O m IM prvpct a.. 1M m.M PngM.r .....dE1.ly rE. dslm.km. ...om.wnr 1. .r.v. toot ue I>Ai.c1 EraaYp. 1.II.et U.. bta••1 nM.bn.. (Y` tq. ~p IPlnm.tkn fr., plm m tU.E rum A.m Pmm lM 42 - Sk. ob Utrttw Plm' e.t.E � teso. (4) At tn.. 1 a ..a .. y.. a mmldw ..n wa a ZO�q ee.a.ulnl BuIEFp vCaravann a . R..N .a.fe. A60o 14-W SP4T232.f.. ill%N.13 ...1I. . m5. .]42tD Tetal let cmwaes 37.2L0 .1 Mll* 45.— .1. (41.It>t) Po." .v..e 1e f.'Ed4.E REVISIONS BY COPYRIGHT © 1994 OU PIAN 076LLTNG Bowls ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NRAAM m Ix w w z I.! p111AWN LRB GJB 1' = 20' cA 12/29/94 94152 C - or 3 .wms T � , O Ia I I N/F JOHN BELTER I I I I I Y I LY I Q SI / \ O / EXISTING I a / TAPPING aD / SLEEVE k VALVE I 1 / w EXISTING 3 GATE VALVE I I I i I I m +I I I = I o I I I 3 E%ISTING HYDRANT / o 1 1 �_�--258-' 261--"-1 _ T 259'--_ c� A__ O O_ EXISTING GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD \ _ 258 — � ' , a EXISTING AUTO -BODY N/E FRANK NAFF h RANDY VOLK SHOP (� SITE PLAN CONTINUED SCALE 1' s 20' Graphic Scale feet 20 0 20 40 60 80 SSTT_ TIRES HOER S CAL our TREES Y CAL !OVER. TREE R00T C SHALL EAR SAME RELATION ro PRISED 1-4 MADE AS IT BORE TD IEYER CO, IEAER PREWOAY EBSTND GAADE E—T N AREAS E ACTED `TIC RUNT 1RFE5 SO ROOT — R ABOVE FBBSED USE B® SYRAPPNG ro E__ MRE 2/3 W TREE OR TD TIEE STAES-SRE OR 2 x 2 iNST BRANCH HWOWDOD-J PER TREE REMOTE BMRAP TREE EIRIP `TON TOR NS BALL EcI WTI TrE NO— IOPSLI 4' TO FORM SAHIO.R PLANING NNZTLAE ;III- III• PER SPEC. T III. 3GARRY BOITIw ! III IE'�I 90ES i• DEER I � OSTro API BFIDB OF .��GVE BOTRIM E TREE nT - n TYPICAL TREE STAKING DETAIL N.T.S. le YN. PLANT MIX GRAVEL COMPACTED SLAPE AWAr FROM BLAIDNG AT 1/B•/rT. YIN. NATIVE MATERIAL. COMPACTED ©TYPICAL DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. STEED. BEAM GUABDRAI� BOLTED THROU POsm (TYP) LEGEND O IRON PIPE UTILITY POLE WATER LINE GATE VALVE YY HYDRANT — X — X X — EXISTING FENCE LINE • EXISTNG WATER MAIN — IINI'M EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE --�— APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE LOCATION ----. ------ EASEMENT - — — — — — - BUILDING SETBACK LINE +--r+••r• PROPOSED GUARDRAIL - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING CONTOUR 0 EXISTING TREE REC"EIVED B MDM EAR 6A E J 4 N 0 6 1995 PFIATON9AP ro `IN491FD MHAE AS IT BME ro NRU0HI5 ExLSTNG aAOE City of So. Burlington IVT ! IEJEONE I� rl I IJ I11= A Il�r �I -I I� 3DER J PITSTS 1 T M. ABi MIME n TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. s PLANT MIX MAMII BADUEL PLANT Mx GRAM BAOETLL STALL OMSST Oi FTEFIDAABNG MANJW MATERIA SATEACTORLY SYNTHER FILTER FABRIC MAED, REASONABLY `WEE 'NON IDAH. SILT. CLAY. AND ORGANIC MATERIALS. AND MEET THE fY%1OYNG SEQIREDCTO HARDWOOD POSTS IXATERIA: SEK M1E I PASSING 2 NOTES lm t Tn NOTES BS - tm 1 J/B NOESNO, 4 NO. 1O IS - `0 FLOW NO. 40 10 - 2p M0. 2m 2 - 6 'I COiAC110NN 6 BACKFYL ANCHOR FABRIC wTH SML, n 2 PEAMT IS x GAVEL SACx SNAIL E NSTALIED IN 6' (4' MIN. DEPTH). TAMP AND BAOQTLL MAxYIM ID zMTAL LTTS AND C ACTED ro NOT LESS THAN BSR 0' THE MADMUM DRY DCN OF THE MATEMA t AT T MTNM OSTNE CONTENT AS ESTA XJS ED BY BRM 2' x 2' HARDWOOD POSTS 6. O.C. TE STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (ASTM BIDS). /-a-'\ SILT FENCE DETAIL PLANT MIX GRAVEL SPECIFICATION - N.T.S. N.T.S. j I I PRESSURE TREATED WOOD Posm ITYP.) 9' x ar x 6•-O' SPACED e'-3' ar WOm solo GAV, BULT W/WASHER JL4 ffT _ 4' TOPsoi ! SEED MATCH GRADE 2 L v4•m. c Iw I I I I I I I I L_J 2 ASCALE: A ADETAIL 3/4' - 1•-0' PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE ' 5 16 "000 sTANE HOW 4' VEWIMII FAE EMBEDDING DETAIL � TµMARD GU STY w�Y lnD BAIF nw 2-2' n2' GIDUDST_ j 111 I t 1� BAES lA9 SIDE BY 5DE W THE OKxIO 2--0' I—) /-51BALED HAY EROSION CHECKS N.T.S. sEmm BP®N'ATYN B® 1BIIILBE - BIG ILM RED ACIE WBI0f1 NNE m,'" [Y BBWT Et 111E B® BBIE AOE CPfEPwG RED `FSOE 3.5 a5 YEroIXY BIUEMLASS 3T.2S W/ N lER BANDY, PEEMAA RYE MM 3 .5 IDfMlfflt - 1b 1' B91 NMe V. {LTA�LLLD,M�SEFIAMG NOT LESS MAN'a5TOTAL GA VB ATE AMLLN APPTOWD TIPXMI w7wilwww1 MABDFMARM MIARA ITEE NO 6 B®M TIIE CONTRACTMt SIA11 REAEWPNSMIE FSIT THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE• NOMDIID WAIETNNG, Ili s®ED MEA Lmm THE 9EDNG a NSPECTEO AIL AI%iPTED BY 1NE FNOPEER. NSI'ECMXI SNAG E MAOE ALIEA TIE SECOND MON11G. DE O]NTRACTOR STALL NOTEY TE MONGER 4e HOURS N ADVANCE ■HEM THE SECOND HOBI IS SO ISCAAM. RESEEDING SHALL E DOE UNIX Aµ ARIAS ARE OA49ETFLY COVEgED w1H A wTAE STAND Ir GRASS. AREA SHALL E CONSIDERED mVEI® wIE1N TIE EN1NE SURFA¢ OONTAMS A Y1mROU$ STAR 6 MIASS. AREAS THAT. N THEOPIINON Oi THE ETNGNEER, AE PTRDMwIAHTLY REEDSSHALL RE —, FINE OIAOED, FFTlx1IID AND RESEEDED N THE YANIER 9R:61E0 ABOV£. n SITE RESTORATION REVISIONS BY BIBI COPYRIGHT ® 1994 IN OIAI" N19LA16 BOEM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Ny'�tiN wN �_ :M== DRAWN LRB OHNNOMCD GJB 81 1' = 20• DALE 12/29/94 94152 C=2 OP' .3 NMNBiTi FIELD VERIFY THAT- LAODING DOCK T.O.W. do T.O.S. ELEVATIONS MATCH EXISTING FIN. FLOOR ELEVATION rc 0 rc U µ BARS O 18' O.C. 3-/4 BARS, CONT. EXISTING PRE-ENGINEERED BUILDING A e 12,0D0 S.F. \1FALL Moar.JT F>F-'tE21dL uv"r1u` 1�� PREFORMED JOINT FILLER 8� WALL 6X6-W2.9 X W2.9 NN I. CLR. COVER 11 rhm' GRANULAR BACKFlLL, 2' CUR. COMPACTED F.G. ' /4 BARS O 12' O.C., CONT. /4 BARS O 12' O.C. �3" CLR. COVER Q TYPICAL LOADING DOCK DETAIL SCALE: 3/4' - 1'-0' I PROPOSED LOADING DOCK)Ii i t BUILDING FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/2' _ ,'-0' Gr ptI Scdl feet 10 10 20 30 40 50 �acfv7NVr MID(WSiNuu4l ESaks i �31 TYPICAL EXTERIOR LIGHTING DETAIL E)USnNG PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION RECEIVED JANO b 1995 City of So. Burlington PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE GRANULAR BACKFlLL: GRANULAR BACKFlLL SHALL CONSIST OF FREE -DRAINING GRANULAR MATERIAL SATISFACTORILY GRADED, REASONABLY FREE FROM LOAM, SILT, CLAY AND ORGANIC MATERIALS AND MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: SIEVE NUMBER x PASSING 2 INCHES 100 NO. 4 40 - 70 N0. 100 5 - 20 NO. 200 4 - B COMPACTION OF GRANULAR BACKFlLL: GRANULAR BACKFlLL SHALL BE INSTAI I Fn IN 6' MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL LIFTS AND COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% OF THE MAXMUM DRY DENSITY OF THE MATERIAL AT THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS ESTABLISHED BY THE STANDARD PROCTORE TEST (ASTM D698). a GRANULAR BACKFlLL FOR STRUCTURES REVISIONS BY COPYRIGHT ® 1994 CNNFLNI COL9LTM9 BIDTFHLS ALL RBGHTS RESERVED LE 'tTA� r/ `y\ V' Z KW F E4 > a o E IS I w a m a .z A � � d z a W T� a a x E-4 w ,n DRAWM LRB GJB �OIILE AS NOTED DA 12/29/94 94152 C-3 or 3 s1¢Ts FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont * 05495 • (802) 878-3000 19 October 1990 Mr. Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Drainage inlet and easement for Lot 42 Ethan Allen Farms FILE: 90064 Dear Mr. Szymanski: Upon revisiting the site and giving this matter considerable thought I do not feel that constructing an inlet at the proposed access road entrance to Lime Kiln Road would be useful at this time. The drainage in the vicinity of the new access road flows generally southeast at a 2 to 3% slope across the front yards of Daniel's Auto Body and K.C. TV and Video. To collect storm water in this area would require extensive curbing and the joint efforts of Naef-Volk, Paul Adams and the City. This raises the question of an optimum location for a storm drain easement. Due to the narrow 30' row and the 24' road width an alternate route seems preferable to crossing Lot 42 and discharging or piping over the steep 1:2 bank. Would a north -south layout east of and parallel to Lime Kiln Road be more advantageous to the City in the event this road is curbed and drained? I discussed your concerns with the Planning Commission last evening and they are leaving it up to you to decide whether or not an inlet and easement will be a condition for granting a zoning permit. I would be happy to meet with you on site to review the drainage and resolve this matter. Please call me. Sincerely, FITZPIATRICK-LLEWEL�YN INCORPORATED i John A. S le JAS/kal LNJS#1:90064-2 enclosure Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying Title 24 V.S.A. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT Chapter 117 (b) Each zoning permit issued under this section shall contain a statement of the period of time within which an appeal may be taken. Within three days following the issuance of a zoning permit, the administrative officer shall: (1) Deliver a copy of the permit to the listers of the municipality; (2) Post a copy of the permit in at least one public place in the municipality until the expiration of fifteen days from the date of issuance the permit. (c) If a public notice is issued under this chapter with respect to the adoption or amendment of a bylaw, or an amendment to an ordinance adopted under prior enabling laws, the administrative officer shall not issue any permit under section (a)(1) of this section, if the permit is with regard to the bylaw, or amendment to a bylaw or ordinance, for the period commencing upon the date of that public notice and ending upon the effective date of the adoption or rejection of the bylaw or amendment, except with the written consent of the legislative body of the municipality given after public hearing upon public notice. Sec. 4444. ENFORCEMENT; PENALTIES (a) Any person who violates any by-law after it has been adopted under this chapter or who violates a comparable ordinance or regulation adopted under prior enabling laws shall be fined not more than fifty dollars for each offense. No action may be brought under this section unless the alleged offender has had at least seven days' warning notice by certified mail. An action may be brought without the seven-day notice and opportunity to cure if the alleged offender repeats the violation of the by-law or ordinance after the seven-day notice period and within the next succeeding twelve months. The seven-day warning notice shall state that a violation exists, that the alleged offender has an opportunity to cure the violation within the seven days and that the alleged offender will not be entitled to an additional warning notice for a violation occurring after the seven days. In default of payment of the fine, such person, the members of any partnership, or the principal officers of such corporation shall each pay double the amount of such fine. Each day that a violation is continued shall constitute a separate offense. All fines collected for the violation of by-laws shall be paid over to the municipality whose by-law has been violated. (b) Any person who, being the owner or agent of the owner of any lot, tract or parcel of land, lays out, constructs, opens or dedicates any street, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main or other improvements for public use, travel or other purposes or for the common use of occupants of buildings abutting thereon, or sells, transfers or agrees or enters into an agreement to sell any land in a subdivision or land development whether by reference to or by other use of a plat of such subdivision or land development or otherwise, or erects any structure thereon, unless a final plat has been prepared in full compliance with this chapter and the by-laws adopted under this chapter and has been recorded as provided herein, shall be fined not more than fifty dollars and each lot or parcel so transferred or sold or agreed or included in a contract to be sold shall be deemed a separate violation. All fines collected - 62 - MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Natural Resources Committee Re: Airport Parkway Warehouse Date: October 16, 1990 The Natural Resources Comi�dittee recviewed the site plans for the warehouse at its October 2 meeting. The following concerns were raised: 1. The parking lot is very close to the edge of the steep embankment. Slumping under the weight of parked vehicles is very likely, as seen elsewhere in the city. We suggest that the parking area, particularly the one space that partially overhangs the slope, be trimmed back. 2. Runoff from the rooftops and parking lot is likely to be a source of erosion and contamination. We suggest that rather than sending runoff right down the slope, it be collected into a basin designed to allow the collected rainwater to percolate into the soil, as it would naturally do. 3. The northern boundary of the property is alongside a proposed residential area. A row of vegetation along this border, such as the cedar that seems to grow so well in this area, would be very helpful in screening this structure from view. 4. According to the blueprints, the soils show evidence of seasonal high water (mottling as high as 3 1/2 to 4 feet from the surface). It's not clear that the leach field offers sufficient clearance for proper waste treatment. 5. As with all projects, erosion control is a major concern. With the steep banks here it is especially important. We suggest covering the exposed slopes with a jute mat as soon as possible, and sewing a rapidly growing seed mix for protective vegetation. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Natural Resources Committee Re: Airport Parkway Warehouse Date: October 16, 1990 The Natural Resources Comi-dittee recviewed the site plans for the warehouse at its October 2 meeting. The following concerns were raised: 1. The parking lot is very close to the edge of the steep embankment. Slumping under the weight of parked vehicles is very likely, as seen elsewhere in the city. We suggest that the parking area, particularly the one space that partially overhangs the slope, be trimmed back. 2. Runoff from the rooftops and parking lot is likely to be a source of erosion and contamination. We suggest that rather than sending runoff right down the slope, it be collected into a basin designed to allow the collected rainwater to percolate into the soil, as it would naturally do. 3. The northern boundary of the property is alongside a proposed residential area. A row of vegetation along this border, such as the cedar that seems to grow so well in this area, would be very helpful in screening this structure from view. 4. According to the blueprints, the soils show evidence of seasonal high water (mottling as high as 3 1/2 to 4 feet from the surface). It's not clear that the leach field offers sufficient clearance for proper waste treatment. 5. As with all projects, erosion control is a major concern. With the steep banks here it is especially important. We suggest covering the exposed slopes with a jute mat as soon as possible, and sewing a rapidly growing seed mix for protective vegetation. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Natural Resources Committee Re: Airport Parkway Warehouse Date: October 16, 1990 The Natural Resources Committee recviewed the site plans for the warehouse at its October 2 meeting. The following concerns were raised: 1. The parking lot is very close to the edge of the steep embankment. Slumping under the weight of parked vehicles is very likely, as seen elsewhere in the city. We suggest that the parking area, particularly the one space that partially overhangs the slope, be trimmed back. 2. Runoff from the rooftops and parking lot is likely to be a source of erosion and contamination. We suggest that rather than sending runoff right down the slope, it be collected into a basin designed to allow the collected rainwater to percolate into the soil, as it would naturally do. 3. The northern boundary of the property is alongside a proposed residential area. A row of vegetation along this border, such as the cedar that seems to grow so well in this area, would be very helpful in screening this structure from view. 4. According to the blueprints, the soils show evidence of seasonal high water (mottling as high as 3 1/2 to 4 feet from the surface). It's not clear that the leach field offers sufficient clearance for proper waste treatment. 5. As with all projects, erosion control is a major concern. With the steep banks here it is especially important. We suggest covering the exposed slopes with a jute mat as soon as possible, and sewing a rapidly growing seed mix for protective vegetation. ON N/F RAY UNS WORTH 2h' 5' MINIMUM 1 I1\ll�\`\GI ,\\ N 8422i0 :�.•' • x - 1000 GALLON CgIdCRETE _-. _ / �r K �1 I \ 1 1 \ •.• ..'"■■••72' / SEP77C TANK _ SETBACK /. + \ ; ■■■■� 14 9.72 - / - ESITE 6 / ti / _ - N 85 53'40" ..�■ I II 1 - - _—''z1y9 y ■���■su�•u�■��■■��■■�•3� — — — — — — — — —ll r{- li i , it,- I - ■q■■■n.■ _ - t -_.----- -.-- ..- _— ■fi,..,...■...■.�■.■S .. -- -- — — — — /lI III I I II II I,I IIII �, s n� , rim_�._. _ ■�a•� / �� '� • / IIllIlill IIj I I Il Ila�' 1ii)lr'lI /jIl"� l/hli;L/N TON srav 161 so _C11I)Ji0.a J 9 IF ROPO ED BUl DING z5..2 255.0 60' X 200' 259:0O1- US :s- cory ros < 1 2 - ----- � ��Js '���''� i'� i'���'%/ : / // P O �.-,.....x,.., - Nis 25J.6 � 12 DJJC ry'y O' li SL£E ro uJ 450 LOADING DO I _-' AS_PH_ALT_� � p NDED FOR BAYS // ,/� i •/ CONCRETE \ + GRAVEL / RI 1oJ .� _----- 7 THROUGH 10 i'%iij i • -j' �'S'•'�j%:. % 5 / / • DISTRIBU77ON-A-_ 01 _ PRO FOR BAYS ns- \�JJ\ \ '/�i ii1q� �� �i i � ��'''.'/ PARKINC/ROAOWAY UGH15 175 ATT CONCR TE SIDEWALK 1 THROUGH 6 --� �i� zi5' �! �''���,/ / j��' METAL HALIDE TYPE FM RECTA 'A TT / INV IN 2532 - p \ % ' ' INV OUT 253.01 / ONE WAY CUTOFF LUM/NA/RE 20' r SQUARE STEEL POLE, BLACK / ��� ANODIZED FINISH. GARDCO fH- I --RETAINING WALL .'O /• �._ \ �. ,q i .' .i �'i '/i �. / / / \-- -� i1'�� � jai/ 14- 1 -FM- 120-175MH-BLA OR EQUAL • �■ `25i - 10 ro r0s _y55 ���� O -�� �Ita a _Lc- ^■ o - i j/.Gi'_' --'i/r'/'i�//'/ i �" ,� AREA=109,798 Sq. Ft. r �■ i %%!-/%�� -- ,'''� �'i1///// ��°' 2.52 Acres J GRAVEL PRIMA Y I I \ h� - /i.// i / /I/ - - • DISPOSAL ` I 18' // / /' 2-0" TO CENTER /i %��% i ��'�,% - - ■./�'■ AREA OF GUARDRAIL 9i%//i% '' J l - •�' I LINES N)I1 CATf LOCAT70N POST (7YP.) OF PROPOSED fjAIMED , �i /i., i / r.■.t I STR/PlfiG IF AREA Pcs' 't� // /� j/ ��/ i. j� - - - _ - r•_� i �-,=�%%" - � NOTES I BECOMES PAVED (TYP. o' �46 i �////, �/ � ;• '� � _ rr I I /J REPLACEMENT 1 / ! '' i / / �'' E .• 1. Owner / Applicant: Paul G. Adams I`%�/ DISPOSAL AREA 1 �' i i'ii'i//j��i�'� N 79'1�••'+� N/F JOHN BEL TE'R 1215 Airport Parkway ■ I 1 %/ m 1oa T Q� //�j/i /' // / •.r/r�516.05 9 / '/ / /i' rr South Burlington, Vermont, 05403 , I (� \ \ /, % // ///'/ j/ r■�r o 2 Lot Area: 2.52 Acres TRUCK TURN -AR ND , �� %/ 'r i , , / /T ' ■■�+ J. Lot coverages: Building :12,000 sq.ft. 10.95 ■ - -- -{ �- 0 - zay _� , / r 1 I EXSTING LIGHT POLE TO BE Parking :29,91J sq.R. 27.T1C ■ $5f _ .. 1 a __ ) �;;Er', r�A, ,'/' ■ I REMOVED OR RELOCATED Green Area:67,886 sq.lt. 61.85 -12" ASH TO BE REMOVED Total Lot Coverage :41,91J s .ft. 38.2x r•■�� ti �e, / ,ti/ , . ,� ,�i� �- 1 ; , 4. Perimeter property line lnformatlon from plan b yd Ethan Allen F'•i�r•■e•■� zsa' ti b',% -,,, i iyi,�' 1 d Farms Industrial Subdivision -Overall Site Plan* by Fitzpatrick U'� Llewellyn Incorporated. Lost revised date /4 October 1988. •,jam 1 5. Topographic Information and existing features by Fitzpatrick-Uewellyn x \`.-. ti�h �, '•M1�' 8 8" Wt70D POSTS � �i r.�01 Incorporated, surveyed during topographic survey June /990 6'-3" O.C. W/ STEEL BEAM GUARDRAILS i 261 --- 6. The presence of utility lines on site indicate the presence of a SEE DETAIL SHEET • __-259--____ __ __ __ -- -' utility easement, no research was performed by this office. ? OF 3 N1 � 1 I ~'sv�� - -- -- --- -- ---- -- lu ABANDONED CONCRETE I l - —'2 e- j 6. 29 Total Parking Spaces; 28 spaces required. FOUNDATION AND SLAB - 1`1 zas A - N O LEGEND GRAPHIC E 6'x8' TAPPING -- { I PROPOSED ASPH%Ttq ACCESS ROAD --- 9 _� _--- _ _ SLEEVE & VALVE �I 25e -- GRAP SCALE 1 o a o I w w ��•• ••� PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE _ ---- ---- RICH T- OF- WAY/EASEMEN T LINE - 1 RK/ / C ET I ( 1N FE) -- -- - EXIS17NG CONTOUR I -see--- 1 m.e - 20 n PROPOSED CONTOUR ---- i PA INS EETHAN ALLEN FARMS --- --- XSANC FENCE LINE 1 - _ CATS VALVE--- 1 � -' EXIS77NG OVERHEAD WIREA77LITY POLE i � � fX/STING L�T 42 BUILDING SETBACK LINE ti — — - -- 1 1 � AUTO -BODY '� soum H;,HI iNGI�N ---- ---- ---- ------KRMONr ---------J N/F FRANK NA£F, PROPOSED BUILDING 6 i / ` � SHOP � RANDY VOCK - PROPOSED GUARDRAIL • IRON P/N TO 8E SET - 1- ----- r�SITE AND UTILITIES PLAN m UTILITY POLE END EXSRNG WOOD FENCE N WATER VALVE ; j REMOVE WESTERLY PORTION -- _ t PROPOSED LIGHT i \ RELOCATE PARKING ENTRANCEPROVIDE PAVED APRON TO EDGE o 0 90064u OF EXIIS77NG GRAVEL. BASED ON AUG 1990 — - 1 APPROVED NAEF, VOLK PROPERTY REMOVE AND REGRADE EXISTING S/7E PLAN SHEET S-1, 1-17-90 PARKING ENTRANCE NCORPORATED --J � u „� scaeccs D 3493 VERMONT 1 :«"' 3 NO !rA if UESL'RIP710N BY ,{ ---- ----------- City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 12, 1990 Mr. John Steele Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Warehouse Building, Lot 42, Airport Parkway Dear John: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also en- closed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 16, 1990 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. i cerely oe Weith, City Planner Encls cc: Paul Adams JW/mcp nttth ? iirf imitn" Yirr Tep(-i tillr"t + 'outf) TflurlinglUil. TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTEi RE: TUESDAY OCTOBER 16,1990 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: THURSDAY OCTOBER 11,1990 1. ETHAN ALLEN FARM LOT #42 Project # 90064 P.Lans have been Aeviewed by this depaAtment and at this time I do not see a prob.2em in given proper emergency protection ij needed. 2. WOODLAND COMMON UNIT #14 INDOOR MINI GOLF At this time I do not see a probtem with the change o6 use on this project which would e66ec.t emergency protection. 3. BONANZA RESTAURANT MOTEL ADDITION SHELBURNE ROAD PtanA have been reviewed by this depaA,tment and the jo.L.Lowing murt be done i6 we are .to beabte to g..ve emergency protection i6 needed; A. Two (2) hydrant6 are needed in a tocat.Lon approved by this 066ice. B. The exit to Swi6t StAeet mu4t be at tea6t 18' wide. Memorandum October 16, October 12, Page 4 - Planning 1990 agenda items 1990 Additional information required: --- address of the record owner --- scale (numerical and graphic) --- north arrow (true and magnetic) 6) PAUL ADAMS, WAREHOUSE, LOT 42 AIRPORT PARKWAY Paul Adams is proposing to construct a 12,000 square foot build- ing on a 2.42 acre parcel on Airport Parkway. The proposed use is for wholesale, storage and distribution warehousing. The property is zoned Mixed Industrial and Commercial. It is bounded on the north by property owned by Ray Unsworth which is proposed to be rezoned to residential. The property to the east and south is presently undeveloped. To the west are several small busi- nesses including an auto body shop and a video store. Access: Access to the property would be via an existing 30 foot right-of-way from Airport Parkway. The paved drive over this r.o.w. would be 24 feet in width. This right-of-way also serves as the access to the body shop. Parking/circulation: 26 parking spaces are required and, 29 spaces are shown including one (1) handicapped space. Size of parking spaces and dimensions of aisles and access drives meets minimum requirements. Since the plans shows 3 parking spaces above the requirements, it is suggested that the easterly parking area be reduced in size to move it away from the side lot line as it is proposed to be only two (2) feet from the boundary and also to move it away from the edge of the bank. Circulation of on -site traffic does riot appear to pose any prob- lems. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement for this project is $7200. The proposed landscaping is short $1587 worth of plantings. The planting plan includes sugar maple, white pine and 2 types of viburnum. Setbacks/Coverage: The building coverage is proposed to be 10.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). The total lot coverage is proposed to be 38.2% (maximum allowed is 70%). Only 10% of the required front yard will be used for driveways and parking (maximum al- lowed is 30%). The proposed building will meet all required setbacks. 4 Memorandum Octobe 16, October 12, Page 5 - Planning 1990 agenda items 1990 Lighting: A total of seven (7) parking/roadway lights are pro- posed. Each light will be 175 watt metal halides type FM rectan- gular one way cutoff luminaire on a 20 foot steel pole. Traffic_ This property is not within any Traffic Overlay zone. The applicant estimates the average daily traffic Lo Le 84 with an A.M. peak of 20 and a P.M. peak of 12. The applicant must. pay $880.00 towards his share of the required improvements to the Airport Parkway/Ethan Drive intersection. This fee was placed on the original 21 lot subdivision approval. Sewer: The property will be served by on -site sewer. The State will have to review and approve the on -site system. Other: The Natural Resources Committee reviewed these plans and will have comments for the Commission. This is a mixed use development which would require a conditional use permit from the Zoning Eoard of Adjustment. 7) WOODLANDS MINI -GOLF, 102 KIMBALL AVENUE This project involves the installation of an indoor mini -golf facility in unit #14 at Woodland Commons on Kimball Avenue. There will be no exterior changes needed. Access: Access to the project is via one (1) access drive to Kimball Avenue. No changes will be made to this access. Parking/Circulation: There will be 20 seats in the facility which will require seven (7) parking spaces. The plans submitted shows a total of 105 spaces for the entire development and the plan approved by the Planning Commission in 1986 shows 97 spaces. The easements which go with this unit indicate that it is enti- tled to 6.2`/0 of the common amenities which translates to six (6) spaces if there are 97 spaces and seven (7) spaces if there are 105 spaces. There will be no changes in circulation. Landscaping: This project does not require any additional landscaping. The plan submitted indicates a row of trees between the northerly building and the walking trail which do not now exist. Some of the required trees on the slope behind this building are either dead or are dying. Some other minor land- scaping changes have been made. 5 To: Joe Weith, City Planner From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: October 16, 1990 agenda items - Preliminary Comments Date: September 19, 1990 ETHAN ALLEN FARMS LOT 42 AIRPORT PARKWAY 1. An easement for sewer construction was given to Colchester in the vicinity of this lot. If it effects this lot, it should be shown on the plan. 2. At the intersection of the access Road with Airport Parkway, the drainage of that side of Airport Parkway is toward the access drive. An inlet should be placed in this area to intercept the drainage and piped to the east. BONANZA RESTAURANT SHELBURNE ROAD 1. This project will be served by the Bartlett's Bay sewerage treatment plant. The reserve capacity of this plant. is ail committed. 2. A site drainage plan shall be submitted. 3. The motel and parking area hooks up to the Lindenwood Drive residential neighborhood. If trucks are allowed to use this motel, especially trucks with refrigeration unit-;3 that run all night, will create a noise problem, for this neighborhood. -Z� ac�lVen, 71- 4ay , Ct,A.-.ego �,4.�.,4 —A _Z2Z FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORr fED Engineering and Planning Ser.. One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO > WE ARE SENDING YOU L�'Attached ❑ Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ ELFFUT-EELI, "@)F mumano-Tuaa. ��AM, .41M,IJ! j/ the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTIQN v J3 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted For your use Aiproved,a,$ noted L4As'requested r U0 >;orrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY PRODUCT 240-2 ees Inc., Croton, Mass. 01471, SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 September 20, 1990 John Steele Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Paul Adams, Warehouse, Lot 42, Airport. Parkway Dear Mr. Steele: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed for your review, please find preliminary comments on the above referenced project from myself, Bill Szymanski, and Chief Goddette. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. ii cere y , i � PJoe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp > > /14APO C-', %% /00 ca F,- q SMALL GROUP INSTRUCTIONS Purpose: Creative Thinking! The purpose of this activity is to generate as many ideas as possible in response to the questions. (Questions are attached) Rules: 1) Get out all the ideas and list them quickly on news- print. 2) Don't discuss or comment. Anything goes! 3) Repetition is O.K. 4) Work as fast as you can. Go for quantity. 2. Discuss and Identifv Issues Go back and discuss your brainstorm lists. Clarify the lists and eliminate repetition. Share opinions on the importance of the identified issues. (15 minutes) 3. Prioritize Issues From one or more of the separate brainstorm lists or issues lists, you now each get to pick the 4 issues that you feel are the most important. You have 4 colored dots - each is worth different points. Place the colored dots next to the issues identified on the newsprint in what you feel is their order of importance. The facilitator will add up the total to come up with the overall highest ranking items your groups identified. Color Points Blue 4 Red 3 Yellow 2 Green 1 4. Develop Goals - See attached page! 5. Report Out Select a member of your group to report out to the other groups. Report your key issues identified and goal state- ments developed. M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: October 16, 1990 Agenda items - Preliminary comments Date: September 19, 1990 1) PAUL ADAMS - WAREHOUSE -SLOT 42, AIRPORT PARKWAY Additional information to be shown on site plan: Show that portion of lot, if any, which lies within 100 year flood plain. Show location of all dumpsters. $2,936.00 in additional landscaping value is required to meet minimum requirement. One (1) handicapped space 13' x 20'. Other: The following information must be provided in order to determine minimum parking requirements: Square footage of floor area devoted to office use. The number of non -office employees. The number of company vehicles operating from the premises. 2) LARKIN PILLSBURY MANOR III - WILLISTON ROAD Additional information required to be shown on final plat: Graphic scale. True north arrow. Length of missing property line distance along Williston Road. Before the application can be warned, a survey plat, stamped by a licensed land surveyor, must be submitted. The plat shall show the entire property (both buildings) as one parcel. Appropriate survey data (mets and bounds) shall be shown including r.o.w.'s and easements_ 3) F.E.P. ASSOCIATES - SECOND FLOOR ADDITION Additional information required on final plat for Final Plat approval: Address of the record owner. Scale, (numerical and graphic). North arrow (true and magnetic). The drainage improvement as discussed between Bill Szymanski and your consultant should be shown on the plan. To: Joe Weith, City Planner From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: October 16, 1990 agenda items - Preliminary Comments Date: September 19, 1990 t' ETHAN ALLEN FARMS LOT 42 AIRPORT PARKWAY 1. An easement for sewer construction was given to Colchester in the vicinity of this lot. If it effects this lot, it should be shown on the plan. 2. At the intersection of the access Road with Airport Parkway, the drainage of that side of Airport Parkway is toward the access drive. An inlet should be placed in this area to intercept the drainage and piped to the east. BONANZA RESTAURANT, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. This project will be served by the Bartlett's Bay sewerage treatment plarit. The reserve capacity of this plant is all committed. 2. A site drainage plan shall be submitted. 3. The motel and parking area hooks up to the Lindenwood Drive residential neighborhood. If trucks are allowed to use this motel, especially trucks with refrigeration units that run all night, will create a noise problem, for this neighborhood. �§nut1 r urlington -7P ire T'wp tictIt f 575 Burset -�'%rcct mutt'Nurlingtnn. llermont 1154113 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY OCTOBER 16,1990 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: MONDAY SEPTEMBER 17,1990 1. LOT 42 ETHAN ALLEN FARMS PROPOSED 60X200' BUILDING Ptanz have been tceviewed by thi6 depatctment and at thi.6 time the ont y ptco bt em I bee t6 two (2 ) hydtcantz a&e kequ4.ned on the ptcopetty at a Location app&oved by thi6 oAAice due to the zize o j the buit ding . 2. Age.-Cotcman Building 518 Shetbukne Road ptan/s tceviewed and at this time 1 do not /see a ptco bt em with thin ptco j eet in given ptco pets emetcgeney ptcotection t4 needed. 3. Pittzbutcy Manok III U1ittiston Road Picojeet # 90101 Date Last Revised 8-22-90 Ptans reviewed on thi4 ptco jeet and at thi6 time I do not see a pnobtem ion outs depaktment i4 emergency ptcoteetion iA needed. 9-1 �7D PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 0 September 3, 1987 John Belter 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Intersection Improvements for Phase III Subdivision, Ethan Allen Farms Dear Mr. Belter: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 On Monday, August 31, 1987 City officials met with Lance Llewellyn and Roger Dickinson to discuss required intersection improvements for Phase III of your subdivision. After that meeting a,nd subsequent discussions with you, I believe we have resolved the traffic improvement requirements to everyone's satisfaction. The steps to this process were as follows: 1) We determined the short'range i.mprovements'that are a minimum requirement for this subdivision; 2) We determined the share of traffic growth that is attributable to 21 lots in Phase III; 3) We determined the long range solution and cost; 4) We assumed a 10% city share of this cost and applied the percentage in step 2 to this share. The result will be your contribution to the long range improvements. The following short range improve meats are required of you for this development approval.. a) Appropriate warning signs at each end of the intersection; b ) R i ght. turn north bourlc:l lane on Airport. Parlhwa,y to al low rights into Shamrock and Ethan Allen Drive. c) South bound 1-c4t, t-.ur•rj, t.hrot-igh lane. on ,Airport, Parkway; :a stop sign olI Shirimrr,< lc poail (rather than removal of the ('rest. i rl h .i. l ); John Belter September 1, 1987 Page 2 These items must be completed before we issue any building permits for these 21 lots. Please submit all signing and pave- ment marking plans to the City for approval prior to permit. Plans must conform with the MUTCD standards. I. A fifth item, a right turn lane at the top of Ethan Allen Drive, is also required as part of ,your project but will be completed by the City of South Burlington in conjunction with the planned road improvements to Ethan Allen Drive. In consultation with Roger Dickinson and Craig Leiner, we have determined that Phase III of Ethan Allen Farms will be responsible for 13.2% of the growth in traffic in the ,year 1992. In 1992 without Phase III, the sum of the approach volumes into the intersections is 1137. With Phase III, it will be 1287. Therefore, there will be a 13.2% increase in traffic through the intersection due to this project. The 1.992 figures assume build out of Phase I and Il. A number of long range solutions were reviewed by City Officials. The most desirable alternative is a complete bypass of this intersection with a dead ending of Airport Parkway in front of the four houses. The cost of this is estimated roughly- at $1.4 million. This assumes: 2000 feet of new road at $150 per foot or $300;000; The connection of Ethan Allen Drive to this riew road, a cul de sac in front of the four houses and prop(_r• si.gnage at $100,000; The bridge reconstruction costing S2 million split. between ('olchest.E�r acid Sough l;l.arl ingt.on or S1 million each. The total $1 .4 mi lliorl should cost, the City 10'% or $140,000. four sl"'(r of t.h i s , i l l be i 3 . 2% or $ 18, 480. This fee may he paid ors a per, lot basis at S880 per lot at the time c;f t,i.li iti.in, p c': t' m i t. . Pin 11} tlac 7, ��i l,t 1 i s i.l c;n 5e: �.c r fee ma} also be paid on a er lot. basis as t.� prFr'ccluisit� to p rFcei.ving building permits. This will 2i1.S0 rrl(lode tIi(,:_.E., lots t.h.:St are "'Inpc)Pal V 1.}' on se}_,i.i, a l l of t.11ese a Yrc eni,'r i s site; ald bc� P"t into I<r i t .in.g and s iric <�od by both ,ruu arm fii l i n >h �.tan�iings. to Olo!irnirlato any f.'utlfre misilrid- PLANNING COMMISSION 25 AUGUST 1987 PAGE 5 at level "E". Mr. Dickinson said location and they propose adding and signs. Mrs. Maher asked how "E". Mr. Dickinson replied until alternative roads exist.. this is a high accident additional warning beacons long it will remain at level widened or some other Craig Leiner said he is not sure the trip generation method used was the best. He has other concerns that the rates are as much as half the ITE rates. Mrs. Lafleur suggested the Planning Commission not necessarily agree with the proposed improvements but that the City Engineer, Craig Leiner, and the applicant and his traffic consultant get together and come up with a list of improvements and associated costs. The developer would then pay a share of these improvements based on the traffic he is adding to the probelm. Mrs. Maher suggested the Commission review the project every few years to see what is happening. Mr. Sutton of Shamrock Rd. opposed the project on the grounds of the dangerous traffic situation. He said on weekends, Air Guard traffic is so heavy they can't get in or out of their driveway. At least 3 people hit the pole last winter, and there have been many other serious accidents. It is one of the most dangerous intersections in the city. He felt that concessions should not be made at the risk of people's lives. Mr. Audette said he needed to know what will happen soon so he knows what to do with Ethan Allen Road. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the final plat of John H. Belter,Jr, for a 21 lot industrial -com- mercial subdivision as depicted on a 10 page set of plans en- titled "Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3. lots 22-42" prepared bv Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, dated February 1987, stamp dated August 5, 1987 with the following stipula- tions: 1. A landscaping bond for street trees in an amount deter- mined �2y the City Planner shall be posted prior to any con- struction. A suitable street tree shall be substituted for the Ash. All trees shall be at least 2-1/2 inch caliper, not 2 inch. 2. A bond shall be posted for streets prior to construction. The amount shall be determined by the City Engineer. 3. The following changes shall be made to the plan within 90 days — — — a. Sewer manhole #9 shall have an 8: stub northerly b. All previously approved lots along the northern PLANNING COMMISSION 25 AUGUST 1987 PAGE 6' side of the new street shall have a sewer stub c. Additional drainage inlets to drain where grades are flat and to limit drainage to 300 feet for each set of inlets 4. An association of landowners to maintain off -site holding ponds and drainage ponds shallibe formed. This will not be City responsibility. 5. The developer shall furnish the City with the name of the contractors doing the -street work, the architect and the en- gineer who will stake out and supervise the -work at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction. Upon comple- tion of the work, the architect and/or engineer shall certify that the work is in conformance with the approved plan, stip- ulations and a—i' other requirements and/or changes that the City requests. 6. The existing trees along Shamrock Road bordering lot 441 for a depth of 15 feet shall not be removed. 7. The private drive serving lots 39 and 40 shall be 24 feet wide within a 50 foot right of way. This shall be shown on the plans. 8. A sewer allocation of 6,000 gpd is made for the 20 lots. The $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. No construction can occur on lots 29 through 41 until capacity is available at the Airport Parkway Treatment Plant. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to see to it that lots 23-28 with on -site sewage disposal hook into the sewer system when it is completed. Prior to approval on 29-41, the pump station shall be in. 9. A plan detailing the location of gas, telephone, elec- tricity, TV cable and street lights shall be submitted for review and approval. 10. Water fittings shall be wrapped with polyethylene where concrete thrust blocks are used. 11. Trees shall be planted at least 5 feet from the water main.* T 12. Depth of topsoil replacement (4 inches) should be noted on typical detail on page 8. 13. The applicant shall be responsible for paying a share of the required improvements to the intersection or other solutions to traffic and safety problems based on the trips PLANNING COMMISSION 25 AUGUST 1987 PAGE 7 generated by these industrial lots. The total cost and scope of improvements shall be established 1?y the City Engineer in consultation with the Street Supervisor, City Planner, and the Regional Planning Commission Traffic Engineer., The share shall be established 1?y the City Planner in consultation with the Regional Planning Traffic Engineer. 14. The developer shall have the option of contributing $15 per linear frontage foot toward the city sidewalk fund or building a sidewalk along his frontage on the unnamed new city street. 15. It is the applicant's responsibility to record the corrected final plat with the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void. They shall be approved the City Planner 'and si ned �?y the Chairman or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. Mrs. Maher seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Following the vote, Mr. Belter resumed his seat on the Com- mission. 5. Site plan application of Orchard Lake Road Properties for construction of a 96,200 sq. ft. building for light manu- facturing on the 80 acre parcel south of Lane Press, 1020 Hinesburg Rd. Dick Trudell explained the development is on the former Semi - con property bounded by the Interstate and Hinesburg Rd. It was subdivided from the Lane Press property. An agreement exists between Semicon and Orchard Lake Properties for an easement. Peter Pollak, president of the company, said they manufacture high precision electrical equipment. It is a clean industry with no oils, no pcb's. They make their own electric current boards. 90% of their work is custom -build. They employ about 100 people now and plan to hire 75 new employees for this facility. These are mainly skilled jobs. Their ultimate aim is to locate the parent company here. The building will be south of Lane Press with access off the Lane Press road. the Sewer will connect through an easement to the pump station. The building will be completely sprink- lered. 160 parking spaces are provided. Mr. Trudell explained there will be a 3-foot berm around 1 side of the building with some screening from the Interstate. He said it is not their intention to hide the building but to . �� �'<•, ��� �;� ifs. y •G:► a,r STA'rE OF VERNIONT AGENCY OF DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION FOR 111STORIC PRESERVATION Presc rvin,E I/crmorit's historic-, architectural aild a1,C11e01o,&a1 rcsotirc c°s January 29, 1991 John Steele Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. I Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 Re: Lot 42, Ethan Allen Farms, S. Burlington. Act 250 #4C0643-3. Dear Mr. Steele: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above -referenced project. We apologize for our delay in responding to your letter. The Division has reviewed this undertaking for purposes of Criterion 8, 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250). Project review consists of identifying the project's potential impacts to historic buildings, structures, historic districts, historic landscapes and settings, and known or potential archeological resources. The purpose of our review is to provide the Environmental District Commission with the necessary information for them to make a positive finding under the "historic sites" aspect of Criterion 8. The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on any historic or archeological properties that are listed on or that may be eligible for inclusion in the State or National Registers of Historic Places. Si i.erely, Eric Gilbertson Director/State Historic Preservation Officer EG/SCJ cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Office location: 58 East State Street (802) 828-3226 Mailing address: Pavilion Building Montpelier, Vermont 05602 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services A t ^y One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 6 February 1991 Mr. Lou Borie, District Coordinator. District #4, Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 RE: Lot 42, Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision; Amendment to Land Use Permit #4C0643 FILE: 90064 Dear Mr. Borie: On behalf of our Client, Paul Adams, we are herewith making application for an Amendment to Land Use Permit #4C0643. The Client seeks permits to construct a 60' x 200' single story preengineered industrial building on the existing 2.56 acre Lot #42 off Airport Parkway. Plan includes a 24' wide asphalt entrance road, gravel parking for 26 vehicles, on site septic system, 8" water line extension, lighting and landscaping. To assist you and the Commission in your evaluation of this Amendment Application, we are enclosing (8 copies): 1. Completed Application Form 2. Schedule A - Fee Information 3. Fee Check for $949.00 4. Fee Check for $100.00 5. Schedule C - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal 6. Schedule E - Adjoiner Information 7. Schedule F - Certification of Service 8. Municipal Impact Questionnaire 9. Location Maps 10. Schedule B - Act 250 Information 11. Appendix I - Supporting Letters 12. Appendix II - Supporting Information 13. Architectural and Site Plans Information Please let us know if you have any questions or need additional material. Design 0 Inspection 0 Studies • Permitting 0 Surveying Mr. Lou Borie 6 February 1991 FILE: 90064 Page Two Since our client is anxious to start construction in the spring, any effort made to expedite this application, such as calling us with questions rather than relying on the main service, will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK7L EWELLYN INCORPORATED Jq n A. Steele cc: South Burlington Councilman, w/encl South Burlington Planning Commission, w/encl Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, w/encl Paul Adams, w/encl Michael Dugan, w/encl JAS/kal ACT250:90064 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services SCHEDULE F Certification of Service You are required by Section 6084 of 10 V.S.A. to send notice and a copy of your application to the municipality, the municipal and regional planning commission in which the land is located and any adjacent Vemont municipality, municipal or regional planning commission if the land is located on a boundary on or before the date of filing yuor application with the district commission. In order to verify that the statutory parties to the application have received copies of the application and thus avoid delay caused by improper distribution of the application, have a representative of the parties sign this form when they receive the application. You may, in the alternative, send copies of the notice and application by Certified U.S. Mail and list the names below. Applicant(s) Name Paul Adams I, the undersigned, have received a copy of an Act 250 application for the above applicant(s).` r Al for t selec n, a ermen, or trustees date fo t06 municipal planning commission date for the regional planni commission for an adjacent municipality, if any* for an adjacent planning commission, if any* for an adjacent regional planning commission, if any* 2le-- L I date date date date I hereby certify that I have forwarded a complete copy of this application to each of the arties entitled to notice pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 6084. AL -- (0 - Cf I Applican (s)/Agent Signature Date Attach additional sheets if more than one town is adjacent to the project lands. 3/89 : SCIIEDF.DOC State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES T. "+ Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Department of Fish and Wildlife Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Telephone #(802) 879-6563 Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist February 3, 1997 Paul Adams P.G. Adams, Inc. 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Adam's: Subject: WW-4-03 80; Industrial building on Lot #42, off Airport Parkway, South Burlington. Our office has received a construction completion report from your consultant, Tim Bergeron of Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. dated 4/5/95. This satisfies Condition # 12 of the above referenced permit for Lot #42. Thank you for your close attention to the permit conditions. ISSi cerely, Irene L. Roberge Administrative Secretary c Town of South Burlington Tim Bergeron of Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 January 29, 1997 Jerry Gerstein Vermont Waste Recovery 6 Green Dolphin Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 1890 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Gerstein: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 It is my understanding that you have made application to the State for a waste recovery recycling facility at 1890 Airport Parkway. Since this type of use may require outside storage, please be advised that outside storage is not permitted at this location without approval from the Planning Commission. Should you wish to discuss this or any other aspect of your project, please feel free to contact me. Sinc ely, GAG OTC r Raymo d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp State of Vermont Ceoartment of Fisn and Wildlife Department of Forests, Paris and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING WAIRED t 300-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-300-253-0195 Voice>TDD January 15, 1997 y&0 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Waste Management Division Solid Waste Management Program 103 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0407 (802) 241-3482 FAX (802) 244-5141 Jerry Gerstein Vemont Waste Recovery Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested 6 Green Dolphin Drive P 383 068 958 South Burlington VT 05403 Re: Categorical Certification for the proposed Vermont Waste Recovery Recycling Facility Solid Waste Management Program Facility ID #: CH037 Dear Mr. Gerstein: On January 3, 1997, the Solid Waste Management Program ("Program") of the Agency of Natural Resources received your application seeking Categorical Certification for the proposed Vermont Waste Recovery Recylcing Facility ("Facility"), to be located at 1890 Airport Parkway in South Burlington, VT. On January 15, 1997, the Agency received a letter from the Chittenden Solid Waste District affirming that this proposed recycling facility is in conformance with the District's adopted solid waste implementation plan. The Program has completed its review of the application documentation and has determined that the Facility qualifies for Categorical Certification under §6-310(c) of the Solid Waste Management Rules. Under the criteria of §6-310(c) of the Rules, the Facility is limited to handling less than four hundred (400) tons per year ("tpy") of various recyclable materials at this site. Collected recyclable materials shall be recycled in accordance with §6-201(aa) of the Rules, which states: "Recycle" means the process of utilizing solid waste for the production of raw materials or products, but shall not include processing solid waste to produce energy from fuel products. Under this definition, materials which are recycled must be sent to secondary processors or to manufacturers which take these materials and convert them into either raw materials or products. Recordkeeping of the type, amount (volume or weight) and source of recyclable materials handled at the Facility is required by §6-310(c)(3) of the Rules. An annual report which reviews Facility operations and which provides the information outlined in §6-3 1 0(c)(1)(A) - (F) and (c)(3) is required by §6-310(c)(4) of the Rules and must be submitted on or before January 20 for the preceding calendar year. If the Facility's records indicates that the 400 tpy limit will be exceeded, Vermont Waste Recovery shall apply for certification for the Facility pursuant to the requirements of 10 V.S.A. §6605 and §6-304 of the Rules. Please have the appropriate personnel review the cited sections of the Rules and this document to ensure compliance with these requirements. I have enclosed a copy of the Rules and the reporting form for your review and use. Chlorine Free 100% Recycled Paper Regional Offices - Barre!Essex Jct./Pittsforci/Rutland/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury Canute Delmasse, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Bv: Andrea Cohen, Program Manager Solid Waste Management Program enclosures c: (without enclosures) Stacey Coyne, Administrative Assistant Dwight D. Moody, Environmental Engineer Anthony Barbagallo, Chittenden Solid Waste District Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission South Burlington City Manager District 44 Environmental Commission AC:DDM:ddm vtwaste l.ccl FORM NR-1 COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS 3-(p vph (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax r� assessment) units (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER / CONSTRUCTION s.f. ( 5 ) l, TYPE OF USE (6) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE ( From Form NR-2 ) A4 (/7� 7t ?;,�> 0 FORM MR-2 COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES (1) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END $ 221.72 / vte (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (From form NR-1) %?_ vte (3) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (from line (3) of Form NR-1) %" units (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE (From Table ST-3) $ / unit (6) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS OF (4) x (5) $ (7) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From line (8) on Form NR-3) units (8) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE (From Table ST-4) $ �� / unit (9) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS $ (7) X (8) (10) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (9) $ / FORM NR-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-5) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) (6) LAND VALUE (From current tax records) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) / $1,000 49;00 s.f. $ 3cl� / S.f. $ b2) units ____RRRi 0 N ry m II N/F JOHN BELTER / I I I I N I I Q o i 1'� EXISTING8'x, TAPPINGSLEEVE h VALVEW EXISTING GATE VALVE n +1 EXISTING C HYDRANT 3 I I I I I I I I I0 I 3 I I I I I I � RRTIIEFs ODER r CAL — TREES r CAL B owL TREE HOOT CGLLM 9NALL BEM SAYE RRA_ TOFRASEm GRADE AS IT BGE TD PREVAOJSLr EI%TRD GRADE EiGPT IN AR t R i 2/! w TREE OR TO RIST BRAAO RYDVE NPIAP PROM TOP aE BALL RILANIRD Me"m PER SPEC. SCARIFY BOTTOM B DES A• D® \ NOTE NORTHERN PROPERTY UK IS BOUNDARY BETWIMI R4 AND IC ZONING DISTRICTS N � S ac cD z 0 0 ry 261 �"-- `�--259---- 259 — - 26p x \ Y X EXISTING GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD \ - _ 258 '" w I i EXISTING AUTO -BODY SHOP N/F FRANK NAFF k RANDY VOLK n SITE PLAN — CONTINUED SCALE I• - 20' Graphic Scale feet 20 0 20 40 60 80 HI ER WT LEADER m ■EB SIAARPWG TO SEOI RD RRE TREE STAG STEEL OR 2 x 2 HYI ,, PER TR¢ - TREE RRM SECURED VIN ♦• TO EGRM SAIIOA DRVE STAR TO 1F BELOR BOTTOM RF TREE INT r3-'\ TYPICAL TREE STAKING DETAIL N.T.S. Ili WN. PLANT WX GRAVEL COWACIED —A I 11PEAI iTOM BLADING AT 1/4•,,ET, MEL NATIVE MATERIAL COMPACTED n TYPICAL DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. PUNT Wx GRAVEL BAOOI L "I Wx OR VEL BACTOLL SENALL COHOST OF FTAmNUNRNG GRARRAA MMATERAL sATISFACTORLT GRADED, RI —ABLY NEE PROM La", SET. CLAY. AND DRGANIC WTRNIALS. AND MEET BE fi1LLOlElE CRIER, $}J<(MBB$ D PASSING 2 NOES ,N , In NINES 0- 1m !n NCN6 !0 - BID a ND. A 2s - As ND. TO TS - AO ND. f0 2 1- 20 . RD.2m 2 - e DOPACTON DP eA00EL PLANT Wx GRAV BACKI 1 9RALL BE NSTALLZD N 6• YA— IDIVZCNTAL LIFTS AID COMIPACTED TO NOT LESS MAIN %x OF THE -- DRY OETI9TY OE TIE YATERIAI AT TIRE 1pI MGSTJRE CONTENT AS ESTABLIRED BY TE STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (ASTM DB%} SLANT MIX GRAVEL SPECIFICATION N.T.S. LEGEND Q IRON PIPE UTILITY POLE WATER LINE GATE VALVE �-f - HYDRANT — X — X X — EXISTING FENCE LINE — W EXISTING WATER MAIN ow EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE LOCATION EASEMENT - — — — — — - BUILDING SETBACK LINE PROPOSED GUARDRAIL - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING CONTOUR C' EXISTING TREE NOTE 9aft 9W1 REAR SAW As RDATDro FRTc NRRADE AS rl RNRE ro INEMORrs E SIBf 040E frpr DRAO � Y RAD, NT . RMND.E r INnAP PRGN Tao n G MALL SDA Wx ,W 6� ! PM3 TPlOR ART MANIATE Tn--P TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. FLOW ANCHOR FABRIC RTN SOIL t IIRI. DEPTH), AW AND BACKFILL x 2• HARDROOD POETS • 6' O.c ra1 SILT FENCE DETAIL N.T.S. STEEL BEAM GUARDRAIL BOLTED THRWGH '• POSTE (TYP.) RELECTOR III 12'-B• O.C.. City of So. Burlington RRESWRE TREATED MOOD POSTS (TYP.) 6' x 6• x 6'-0• SPACED W-r O.C. s/WPx16•AL .a. S010 GV. BOLT r/rASIET P TOPSOIL ! 5® • 'I I MATCH GRADE 1 { 2 I I �1 I � I ,a•m. soPE { { I I I I I I I I I I L-J r21 TYPICAL GU DRAIL DETAIL SCALE. !/•. � ,'-D' WOOD STYE HDY (�I A• VEIIIICAI FACE EMBEDDING DETAIL +a BT LAD BYE FLOW AKES m:Pm aOLr WOODINo w Y-D• (INK) I II 1 I I � I 1 � LAD ROE BY SDE GR nE GROGD Y-O• I—) r5'\BALED HAY EROSION CHECK N.T.S. BImBR ET®LDR,LDR t® MDIRBE - RBB MA PER AGE mBLDR NAME POET 91 Elf L2L LIME f!m Pa NICE GEEPRNc RED PESCLIE is'.S As AEIITIICAY BWEORP35 371E 3T.s RNTER NAWY, Pvowu RlE M.m ll.s IElE1Blm1 - L• Pa ,LIDD V. Nc FALL SEmPMo NOT LEA TITAN %A OT TIE TOTAL CARBONATE . r APpNVFD TOPBOI MR/pIAAIDE. BYARMIQ AM AD®TYRW OF L®BR TIE CDRTRACroR SNNLL BE � RTIN TIE C.PRE AND MAIN1dANLL NCLIDING rATERRNIL Or SEEDED AREA ONx TE SEEDING 6 INSPECTED AID ACTED BY THE EMOKER. BISEECTION 9WL BE MADE AFTER THE SECTHD MOPING 'E COR, TOR SNRNL Rom "E ENDREDI N IMORIRS IN AWAA Z NON TIE X— NDIBRG IS SOEDIILID. RESEDRIG SINL BE DORE Rx ALL AREAS ARE COMPLETELY NVERD RTN A M.E S. AN STAID Or DRABAREA — RE OWSDOED O.A ED REIN lIE ONTRE OIFEACE CONTAINS A MODRGIs GRYE SrA OT ASS AS _T. I. M TPIBD — 0, ,E [NGRmL ARE T,1 ID B S STALL BE RAID. FRE GRADED. FOIxIIID AND RESEEDED IN M MYRET sPECBFD A n SITE RESTORATION REVISION'S BY rn,/+! mARAL REwGRs m COPYRIGHT Q 1994, 1995 OWFUN 019LTNC BIOFBIS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED EV 2 W a H a 17) A A w z d z W (� a 6- R a x E W 0 ORAwM LRB GJB 1•=20' wTx 12/29/94 94152 C=2 a 3 BN¢Ts REVISIONS I BY EXISTING PRE-ENGINEERED BUILDING A 12,000 S.F. WALL MOUNTED EXTERIOR LIGHTING, TYP. (7 PLACES) PROPOSED LOADING )IISTING PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION /'l1 BUILDING FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/ 3.' - 1'-0- FIELD LAOD VERIFY THAT LAODINC DOCK T.O.W. t PREFORMED JOINT FlLLER Graphic Scale T.O.S. ELEVAl10N5 8- MATCH E10S71NG FIN. WALL 6%6-W2.9 x W2.9 leel FLOOR ELEVATION 1 1 Y 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 1- VED CLR. COVER FEB 0 3 1995 JI a 3 6 f A Rectangular HID (Wall Mount) ESene n o City of So. Burlington ,1 GRANULAR BAOffILL. �,.. .m .... .c ...� 2- CUR. COMPACTED .. rnl� t o aok EXSTING F G ,� •` • r.,wxna+eu FgsurMMl /4 BARS O 12. O.C., CONT. 0. W' /4 BARS O 12' D.C. o... «°•-r o GRANULAR BACKFIW ... GRANULAR BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF FREE -DRAINING GRANULAR MATERIAL SATISFACTORILY GRADED, REASONABLY + FREE FROM LOAM. SILT, CLAY AND ORGANIC MATERIALS AND } f } MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1 - �-�n �me "�+ �1 SIEVE NUMBER X PASSING 2 INCHES 100 NO. 4 40 - 70 p BARS O NO. 1DO 5 - 20 18 O.C. mow„ NO- 200 4 - 8 '�"-'^" �"""" COMPACTION OF GRANULAR BACKFlLL: % ..i. _ GRANULAR BACKFlLL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN 6- MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL LIFTS AND COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% OF 97 THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY OF THE MATERIAL AT THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS ESTABLISHED BY THE STANDARD PROCTORE Y CUR COVER ..c...r TEST (ASTM D698). 3-/4 BARS. CONT. •-D '�`�+r`�°r'-`.. RUUD GRANULAR BACKFILL FOR STRUCTURES ,/�2 TYPICAL LOADING DOCK DETAIL SCALE: 3/4- - 1'-0- 7OW HPS WALL DOWNLIGHT 3\TYPICAL EXTERIOR LIGHTING DETAIL +rnM oFranu +civDa ce COPYRIGHT ®1894, 1995 OMIPLAN 099111C ENacm ALL RIGHTS RESERVED .91 WA 7i 0 z w� cti o zm om E- o0o m vi ohm z O aygm m� z -� x U 4. DwAw IN LRB GJB AS NOTED DA- 12/29/94 94152 spErr— C-3 0 3 = CHAMPLAIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL & FOUNDA77ONS • SITE PLANNING • SANITARY& WA7ER February 2, 1995 Mr. Ray Belair CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Planning and Zoning Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: PRE -HEARING COMMENTS - 1890 AIRPORT PARKWAY ADDITION South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Belair: Summarized below are responses to the pre -hearing comments received to date concerning the proposed 4,800 s.f. warehouse addition to 1890 Airport Parkway: PT.ANNTNr, Landscaping - the proposed landscaping plan has been revised to reflect the 7/21/92 original approval of this project. As requested, additional landscaping has been added to screen the north side of the existing building and proposed addition from the adjacent Unsworth property. The planting schedule, located on plan sheet C-1, has been revised to reflect these changes. Dumpster - no exterior dumpster is proposed at this time. Exterior Lighting - the building mounted exterior lighting proposed is RUDD LIGHTING (or equivalent) wall mounted E4 series projection cutoff units, 70 Watt high pressure sodium. Cut sheets of this product are attached for your information and are located on plan sheet C-3. North Property Boundary - the north property boundary between the Unsworth and Adams properties has been noted to be the boundary between the R4 and IC districts. Front Yard Coverage - the front yard coverage west of the front of the existing building to the westerly property boundary at the 60' r.o.w. intersecting Airport Parkway is approximately 11.3% of the total lot coverage, and includes the gravel driveway and parking area (11,900 s.f. or 10.80) and the paved entry area (500 s.f. or 0.50). Additional lot coverage calculations are summarized on plan sheet C-1. 128 Prim Road, P.O. Box 453, Colchester, Vermont 05446 802 •863 • 8060 Office Area Total Square Footage - the existing building square footage devoted to office area only is approximately 576 s.f.; the proposed addition will add another 220 s.f. of office area, making the total office area approximately 796 s.f. Total Employees - The existing building presently has 5 office employees only. The proposed addition will result in 2 new office employees and 2 new non -office employees, making the total number of employees = 7 office employees and 2 non -office employees. CITY ENGINEER The dimensions of the proposed addition have been added to the revised plan sheet C-1. Please call me at 863-8060 if you requiree any further information prior to the site plan hearing. Sincerely, CHAMPLAIN CONSU�LTI�N�G ENGINEERS Gre ombardier Enclosures Page - 2 Fair-.— = — _� ',' + L•4 •_• I L• o. •=. h E 11 •a i r-1 Z i r-1 -a F• . 0 1 r ;r 4 * f r t 1 {'�.. x , t I 1 Wattage/ Catalog Mounting Description LempType Number Petition 70w MH HPS Note; Suli x'13' Indicales glass lens lnserl is suppred. Vollega Suffix Key: (Avallablevohagesits listed under OPTIONS) I %120V 2.277V 3.208V 4.240V I.341V 11. Duakiap: In US In Cenada 5OW MH .120127TV: 70W MH .120/347V optionl:Change Add After AeA"y 0e1011pl10n suffix To Suffix 14W41. 208Vba4ast(HPSorly) 3 $J6 240Vbaliasl(HpsOnly) 4 J6 H Bronze VerticaiMounting(ESSerlescnlr) V �JQ (Notavallahlowhenbolhhot and oholot9lisup lien Tamperproof Lens fasteners J g NOTE: This opllon Is available for High Pressure Sodium only; Metal HaVIA hyluras are slandard with a dual•tap ballast (see VQllage Suffix Key above). Aeeettortes: (nll4•1nswIt4)(PopeHt033) Ae'&� Deeorlplion Cala►ooNumbar re Surlace Mounlirig Box Ese• 7 t j? Pole Mounting910el PAS-? Tan)Derp root Screwdriver TPS-1 1 �01 FV ES Series Up/Down Cutoff The optics provide controfled upiight and downllght with side cutoff, The E5 Series optics are also available for vertical mounling; add suffix "V" to catalog number. NOTE: Suffix V Is supplied with a glass lens inserl to allow operation in the wall-mounled position. Werles DeepShlelded Front brightness shielding is Provided without sacrificing yride Iighl disiribul[on. It is ideal over enlrances, UP/Down Cutoff 70WHPS, Wmountingheight. •d1' 40, 30' 20• 10' 0' .- - - WdpF 11-spermird OLMarc:JTi�I — — __r iai , �� II ��■. i`ate�fi�n■r' w■v.ww■r■' i+0" -�ar1WONr rnuI=1 ,I►IMhlrira 'jiff'' W wt imp •�■%w9■�■■■AC in eii"Ieiwr r* g ■ARat���llt! �. .�Mn■■www �rlRralt•�PalRpOrIN arwnw* F 0 I 7 9 4 5 01e*s! In Un'IS orldounlinj HEiyhl Mounting Mullpliers Height(11.) Multiplier 7' 2.04 8' 1. 8' 1.23 10' 12' 069 is, 0.44 20' 0.25 LUD TIN DeepShlclded 70WHPS, IS'mounfingheight. rAM�' Dislanca In Unlls of M;unliny ffelpht Mounting Mullpllers Helght(n.) Multiplier 8' 3.52 10' 225 12' 1.56 15' 1.00 Ob6 25' 036 This Ruud Lighting product features our Exclusive DeltaGuard"r"I'l Finish F-4 Ci '•, — -• — '=4 4 T 1_1 E 1 0 ' 4=1 LJ I F • •�_ •_ f� E r-� i r-� ._ Rectangular HID (Wall Mount) E Series "irk Recii ngulalrOydarinlotmation Vollspi 3u11Ix Key:(Aya':atievoRey?;ire li;:t0010UPIly"7) 1.120V 2.277V 3.208V 4.240V 5.347V D. Dual-I'1n U 5.120/277V; in Canada 5CW MH • 1201277V; 70w I'AH-1207347V OPIIons:;ladlry•lne:a!rOJ anpAdd dAtet AID OescrlpSuffix llon o lf xoldr•c 208V ballast (HPS only) 3 �`16 .. 2a0V ballast (HP5 only) 4 �- Vertical Mounting 0scnes01y) V �Flo (Not available when both hplandphoiccellsupptied) J Tamperproof Lens, Fasteners *NOTE: This option Is av311MIt for High Pressure Sodium only, Metal HalidOIIAWes _ are standard with a dual -tap ballast (see Vott"Ie Sullix Key above). ACCIJforiet: (14id•lnsfalled)(PagoH10331 ���y DeeorlPuon catalog Number Cu Surface Mounttng 11ox ES9'7 Pole Mounllna Hra0al PAS-7 16 Tam r roolScrAwdrlver TPS-1 1 win t r .. terinAnA W11h f1Ylrlrs. E3 Series PerimeterCutoff The reflector directs 110h1 downward to wash the wall below and to the sloes of the fixture. The wide distribution permits maximum spacing between fixtures • The E3 Series optics are also available for Vertical mounting: add suffix "V" to catalog number, E4Serles Projection Cutoff The rellerlor projects light out and away from the fixture. An excellent choice for lighting small parking Of public areas next to buildings. Perlttreter Cutoff 70VI 11PS,15' mounilnu height. For 100W HIPS W/208 or 240V and all MH Ilxlures, lha housloo depth IS 3', and IN overall Iixturs depth 1e 7.21. Projection Cutoff 70W HPS,15' mounting height. 3, 4 S o 1 c a Oi;:a rFlnUr I: offdccntlnpHelgM Distance Ir. Unit;ofMeuni;ngHeight Mounting Mul)pller9 Hel hl ft. Multiplier .� 3.52 10' 2.25 12' - 1 , 0. 25• 0.36 Mounting Munplfers Hal hf It. Mu111 leer 0• 3.52 10' 2.25 12' 1 20, 0, 0.36 0 SAVE 35-50 /o EVERYDAY when YoUr buy. facto ry-d i rect from Ruud Lightingl Phone y(800)236-/7�000 r_lY (A�tin) TI6.7500. M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files A�11 From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, February 14, 1995 agenda items Date: January 26, 1995 DAVID ROSS - AUTOMOTIVE ACCESSORIES OUTLET - SITE PLAN --- 15 evergreen trees were supposed to be planted as part of the original approval which have not been planted. These trees were to be planted at the north end of the parking area near Williston Road and along Gregory Drive. Applicant will be required to plant these trees. Plan should be revised to show these evergreen trees as shown on the original plan including several street trees along Williston Road. --- show location of nearest fire hydrant. --- plan should show current names of abuttors. --- provide details (cut sheets if possible) of all building mounted lights and show locations on site plan. --- two (2) handicapped spaces required, only one (1) shown. --- provide front yard coverage information along Willisotn Road and Gregory Drive. --- a bike rack should be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. --- the note "Proposed New Building" should be removed since this application is not for the construction of this building. PAUL_ADAMS - WAREHOUSE/STORAGE ADDITION - SITE PLAN landscaping planted is $3400 short of the $7200 required as part of the 7/21/91 approval. Proposed addition requires $3,000 of additional landscaping. Plan should be revised to provide $6400 of additional landscaping and include a planting schedule. Staff recommends that the additional landscaping be planted along the north boundary as shown on the 7/21/91 plan. --- plan should indicate that the north property boundary is the uF. boundary between the R4 and IC Districts. --- provide total square footage devoted to office use, provide total number of non -office employees and number of company vehicles operating from the premises (existing and proposed). --- provide front yard coverage information (along westerly boundary). --- indicate type and wattage of exterior lights. --- if the site will have a dumpster, it should be screened and shown on the plan. /67 No Text -Jo 3 -7 . �4 ; 7XO qw 4 41P 15 � '�' '� d� •ram � � ;0? ;45x 95 : 15; G 4 . —i " 31 1% �►-, d� %ate = IT _ 145� r7; /02vto �2. 53*' = �a s-• as City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 26, 1995 Greg Bombardier Champlain Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 453 Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1890 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Bombardier: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, February 3, 1995. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sin rely, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: February 14, 1995 agenda items Date: January 26, 1995 RIVCO, INC. - GREGORY DRIVE Site plan prepared by Mike Dugan with latest revision dated January 3, 1995 is acceptable. MERRIAM -GRAVES CORPORATION - WILLISTON ROAD 1. New curb cut on Victory Drive shall be a depressed concrete type and closed curb cut shall be the barrier type. The curb cut to be closed on Williston Road shall be granite as existing. The City Street Department may have some at the facility on Patchen Road. 2. Drainage from expanded facility shall drain toward the street especially the large 1660 square foot area. TEN FARRELL STREET - SWIFT STREET Plan received January 10, 1995 is acceptable. PAUL ADAMS PROPERTY - AIRPORT PARKWAY 1. Plan of proposed addition should have dimensions on it. 2. Except for above, plan prepared by Champlain Consulting Engineers dated 12/29/94 is acceptable. VON TURKOVICH - 260 SPEAR STREET 1. Water and sewer services to lot 2 should be shown on the plans. If they cross lot 1 an easement should be given to lot 2. I E #uutb N urltngtolu N tre Department 575 i9nrset fteet 1 � twth Nurhu9tan, Vermont 05403 FAX: (802) 658-4748 (802) 658-7960 TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Wallace Possich, Fire Chief DATE: January 25, 1995 RE: Plans Review for February 24, 1995 Meeting I have reviewed the following site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. von Turkovich Property Dated 1-12-95 260 Spear St. Project No. 306-94 Acceptable 2. Merriam -Craves Dated 1-11-95 Williston Rd. Acceptable 3. 10 Farrell St. Building Dated 1-10-95 Acceptable 4. Paul Adams Property Dated 1-6-95 Ethan Allen Farms Project No. 94152 Acceptable 5. Rivco Inc. Dated 1-3-95 Gregory Dr. Acceptable 6. Economou F'arms.Development Dated 1-4-95 Preliminary sketch plan is acceptable. Details on water system, hydrants, road widths, turning radii, etc. will of course have to be reviewed as development progresses. SITE PLAN CHECK LIST --- Lot drawn to scale -Y Survey data (distances and lot size) --- Contours (existing and finished). J� Existing vegetation and natural features. --- Proposed landscaping (number, variety and size) equal or greater than the required amount in section 19.104 of the Zoning Regulations. --- Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings. --- Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. --- Zoning boundaries --- Number and location of parking spaces. (RV parking for multi- family projects over 25 units). --- Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. --- Location of septic tanks (if applicable). --- Location of any easements. --- Lot coverage information: Building, overall and front yard. --- Location of site (Street # and lot #). --- North arrow --- Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. --- Exterior lighting details (must be downcasting and shielded). --- Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). --- Existing and proposed sidewalks (public). --- Sewer calculation --- Height of new construction. --- Setbacks (residential district, planned r.o.w., Interstate). --- C.O. Zone --- Bike racks --- Traffic generation --- Traffic Impact fees --- PUD/PCD standarads --- Airport Approach Cone --- outside storage/display --- F.A.R. --- Lot merger agreement CHAMPLAIN CONSULTINf $GINEERS, P.C. Bayside Squart . 336 Malletts Bay Avenue COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 863 - 8060 TO G! l ?-`r' d5>/C WE ARE SENDING YOU �ttached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints A19'Plans / ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ze, Fie LETTEOF TRANSMITTAL DATE / JOB NO. Z ATTENTIOfy..� RE: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION X:l&96-cT YEA / ('' x / 7" 11649re„�6P .W1� cr.�T<�� �' �'XeS cam'. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Make corrections noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Amend and resubmit ❑ Return corrected prints Y For review and comment ❑ Rejected see remarks ❑ FORBIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS JANu b RN5 city o 12 COPY TO CHAMPLAI ONSULT NGIN .0 SIGNE If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once/ CHAMPLAIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS S7RIJC'77/RAL& FOUNDA77ONS . SITE PLANNING • SANTIARY& WATER November 17, 1994 Mr. Raymond Belair CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: PAUL ADAMS PROPERTY - 1890 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Belair: Champlain Consulting Engineers has been retained by Paul Adams to develop a revised site plan for his 1890 Airport Parkway property. We are in the process of collecting as -built field information, and will submit a revised plan for your review as soon as possible. Feel free to call me at 863-8060 if you have any additional questions at this time. Sincerely, CHA;MPLAIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS Greg mbardier ti 128 Prim Road, P.O. Box 453, Colchester, Vermont 05446 802 •863 • 8060 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 13, 1994 Paul Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 1890 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Adams: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 A recent inspection of your property at 1890 Airport Parkway revealed that the site was not developed in conformance with the approved site plan. Consequently, you are in violation of Section 26.10 of the zoning regulations. To correct this violation you must either alter the site so it is identical with the approved plan or have a revised plan approved by the Planning Commission. You are also in violation for not planting the required landscaping and allowing the building to be occupied without a Certificate of Occupancy. Please contact me at your earliest convenience so we may discuss the steps you must take to come into compliance with the zoning regulations. Sinc 'rely, Raymbnd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 18, 1994 Paul Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 1890 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Adams: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This letter is in regards to the warehouse building you are presently constructing at 1890 Airport Parkway. At the time you were issued a zoning permit three (3) years ago, you gave the City a bond for the landscaping. This bond will expire on August 13, 1994. Since the landscaping has yet to be installed, the City requests that you provide another three (3) year bond for this landscaping. This is to assure that the plantings take root and have a good chance of surviving. ' If you do not choose to extend the bond, the City will have no choice but to cash in the bond. Please let me know by August 1, 1994 whether you will be extending the bond. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si rely, R ym d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 August 28, 1991 Paul Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Warehouse Building, Lot 42, Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Adams: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. JJev'Wmeith, 'rely, Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: John Steele CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PiiONE NUMBER OF: a) Owner of Record Paul Adams, P.G. Adams Inc. 1215 Airport Pkwy., South Burlington, Vermont 862-8664 b) Applicant Paul Adams c) Contact Person John Steele, FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive, Williston, Vermont 05495 878-3000 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Airport Parkway, Lot 42 Ethan Allen Farms 3) PROPOSED USE (s) Approved October 16, 1990 for 12,000 square feet of wholesale, warehouse, distribution; no change in use. 4) SIZE OF PROJECT: (i.e. Building Square Footage, #units, maximum height and #floors NC S) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full and part time): NC 6) LOT COVERAGE: Building NC %; Building, Parking, Outside Storage: NC g 8) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings: $ NC Landscaping $ NC Other Site Improvements: (Please list w ith cost) $ Proposed change: delete 150' of 8" water line and a 2nd hydrant as reviewed and approved by Fire Chief Goddette on 7/16/91. 9) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLE1ION DATE: Spring of 1992 10) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY ZRAFFIC (in and out) NC 11) PEAK HOUR(s) OF OPERATION: NC 12) PEAK DAY (s) OF OPERATION: NC SIGNATURE Paul Adams 1g112'`iI The appeal was granted unanimously. No. 4 Appeal of Paul Adams Appeal of Paui Adams, seeking a variance from Section 19.104(c) landscaped buffer requirements. Request is for permission to construct a 60'x200' struc- ture to within fifteen (15) feet of the northerly side yard (minimum setback 65 feet) which abuts a residential district, on a lot containing 2.5 acres, located at 1890 Airport Parkway. Mr. Ward informed the Board the area is zoned I-C District. Abuts R-4 Dis- trict - rezoned 1/28/91 (from I-C District to R-4 District). Section 19.104(c) requires a 65 foot setback with a 15 foot buffer strip (landscaped). Proposed 60'x200' structure = setback 15 feet (uses warehousing, wholesale, etc.). Lot contains 2.52 acres, no frontage - 30 feet right-of-way off Air- port Parkway. Mr. Adams had this approved over a year ago but he did not build it and the permit expired and he came back for a Planning Commission review and he has a different setback which requires a 60 foot setback with a 15 foot landscaped buffer strip. Mr. Adams informed the Board that the building is a commercial building for rental, but there are no tenants at this time. Mr. Johnson asked what the traffic thought is on this structure having no set use at this time. Mr. Ward replied the Planning Commission has already reviewed this proposed structure. The appeal was granted unanimously. Maureen O'Brien moved that we accept the findings of fact and the minutes of _'•uly 22, 1991. This was seconded by Mr. Johnson and all voted aye. Maureen O'Brien moved for adjournment. This was seconded by Mr. Chamberland and the meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Clerk r No. 2 Appeal of Peter Val Preda Appeal of Peter Val Preda, seeking a variance from Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements and Section 19.05 Conditional use expansion. Request is for per- mission to construct a 18'x 60' car wash to within nine (9) feet of the re- quired rear yard, located at Budget Rent-A-Car, 700 Airport Parkway. Mr. Ward informed the Board that the area is zoned I-C District. Existing use rental vehicles with car wash is Conditional use, Section 13.20 sub section 13.206. Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements - minimum rear yard 30 feet, proposed rear yard 9 feet. Section 19.05 Conditional use sub section 19.056 applies expansion to an existing conditional use. Plus a variance to dimen- sional requirements - proposed 18'x 50' car wash. Mr. Val Preda informed the Board that his existing car wash is too short so that when the cars come out they do not have a chance to dry off, especially in the winter. Mr. Johnson asked if this is going to be an increase on the sewer capacity be- cause it is a larger car wash. Mr. Val Preda replied no. Mr. Val Preda addressed the conditional use criteria. (1) The depth of the property is physically unique and the frontage of the lot is 1100 feet; (2) the physical irregularity of the property is the reason for the variance; (3) the hardship was created in the shape of the property to build this car wash; (4) the car wash will not alter the essential characteristics of the neigh- borhood because there is no other neighbor except for the airport; and (5) this is a minimum variance. The appeal was granted unanimously. No. 3 Appeal of Lawrence Press Appeal of Lawrence H. Press, seeking a variance from Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements. Request is for permission to construct an 8'% °' mud room to within twenty one (21) feet of the required front yard, located at 29 Meadow Road. Mr. Ward informed the Board that the area is zoned R-4 D:strict. Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements - minimum front yard 30 feet., proposed front yard 21.5 feet. Proposed construction of 8' x 8' mud room. Lot 100'x 100' = 10,000 square feet. The existing house is 24'r 30' cape with attached one car garage. The variance is for 9 feet. Mr. Press addressed the 5. Criteria (see attached Exhibit A). Mr. Johnson asked where the front yard faces. Mr. }'rise i eplied that the front yard faces Mrs. Barnes' back yard. 1 know of the addition. Mr. cress : eplied :.hat he idiot m,. j t1:at he W@S putting Up a S11?al aCj11: jf) whe- !-.e f it st met was REVISIONS I BY LEGEND O IRON PIPE •� UTILITY POLE WATER LINE GATE VALVE HYDRANT — X — X X — EXISTING FENCE LINE M EXISTING WATER MAIN allw EMSTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE - APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE LOCATION --- -- -- EASEMENT - — — — — — - BUILDING SETBACK LINE +-++-r• PROPOSED GUARDRAIL - EXISTING CONTOUR " Q EXISTING TREE n EXST 26, CA O � 1000 CAL CONCRETE SEPTIC TA _ SIONE-MAR(OR_�--- 261 FOUND — 101. I N� 260 ci W I - Em PAN ® w 257 l A 10' WIDE - BERM, TYP. /-- GRAVEL LOADING / AREA. TYP. MARK QTY. BOTTAIMCAL NAME COMMON MANE SIZE ROOT COMMENTS ® ® © ® 8 ACER SACCHARUM SUGAR MAPLE 2 1/2" CAL. (MIN.) 4' HEIGHT (MIN.) BB BB BB 6' TO LOWEST BRANCH 30 PILAUS STRUBUS WHITE PINE 22 LABURNUM DENTATUM ARROW WOOD VIBURNUM DARK AMERICAN ARBORVITAE _ FRAGRANT VIRBURNUM 3' HEIGHT (MIN:) 36 THUJA OCC. NIGRA 3' HEIGHT (MIN.) -.. -2' -. 2 1 IN. HEIGHT (MIN.) BB 9 1 WARBJRNUM CARLE51 /2 CONT. N/F RAY UNSWORTH / �16.34' PLANT UST 83$310" E .- ®,•.. ^ �. ;- ,may® ��:�t.�� � y,� � � � /� y� NOTE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE Is BOUNDARY BETVAEN R4 AND IC ZONING DISTRICTS. R ; NED FEB 0 3 '1995 City of So. Bu►lington N � 1 i O �1 1 1 \ •A ?.� iw`•• l �jl / Y1L1ZA PlKidy �l ��W. � M .V 4 NGTO LOCATION MAP N.T.S. IRON PIPE FOUND IRON )PIPE H 8_��-__�-- / / 149.72' / 135.3 I If PROPOSED ADDITION EXISTING PRE-ENGINEERED F.F. ELEV. • 259.0' 1 BUILDING F.F. ELEV. O 259.0' 0 _ OP �-- LOADING �� �' / // / DOCK EASTING PAVED / ' _ RAMP ' i" ,i// / 7N• ' / ►P ' / / 55 srAK® HAYeAI� _T'A FORE SANITARY SE \ / ' SEWER FORCE MAIN /i /// /q52•- // /// /`/ // //' / EASE TETONN HESTER RESERVE FOR / / / / / / / . = — --• DISPOSAL �A .bar.I.wn 1. P Pd Dssplbn: 6 • .AW :r. walwg aDana. J_r�� �. I 1 � L Qlyw QVw 10' SPIKE I ® ' _ 'LS 1A5 SET / 8• X 8' WOOD POSTS 1 / O•Y�� �,/ \\ 6'-3- O.C. W/STEEL BEAM GUARDRAILSSIP 1 ITE P AN SCALE 1' = 20' Graphic Seale feet 20 0 20 40 60 80 lam - PAVL a ADAYS P.G PDN13, a1c 9D1TX •1XulNciaN, yr pJIN (IO2) yet-ey1 PnIM En�w - ITwWa• re.auq Fn•rn.+ 1m PM1n ease P.D. Be. ass Celdnlls. Vsmalt ae.ye �K oQ (1) e1k pay Y b lapopiPk Pl/oa•i silt ana Y M m M aaw•..a s an amlrta arssll aawaar si'sY Prepsir Dr •.e.n v. aPweYnot• aM a• b r,llssln ori% aM mq ells i a amYa..a on a man ao•Pata s.isir lanaar aPwy. (2) N Ww11ma Mewl m 11* oli an •owe on m �w.aa LSWwwt aM sa not u.SG.Y. ae•lm. (3) Plb m es.w.a.e•y rl•.al trr D...a Cenevcl> rM ale.nyl ale ease Pea ovlauam �) Tlr Gard te.l ra. ws art:t Dc N m eoo-zm-aPn) tr1.e 1w. Pb m my •.eaium m amlMllY itotyl✓t 1P. loivan ae w ar.vla.�e lnwr ba1M m •w P.alla+ elm. (3) •l.a• sr...1a.. m Du vePe'1 a�awy. s• uMw. esmeel M so1Na Eiglwa �lwnalatsY b ebmmlbn. (a: o.ohal saMroa •y.Pilraw YY m aw.. ua (snitlY a iPgi lane td katl WMIw Play aema Al• IM sIE yW[iT able: <1) P.e.1a. ea.awla Iom1Y 7a a aar•w. aW 1M 9a+a PAPe _y olea.eaw .a1 — eY - _t Daopatbnd. 3aMY s.a wsln A•.1nrPoum (1491A), s e mwlnwm. a a mn.. (]) N segYala sW ldw •d M Pmy ee.sa0 a lYnloea.a a tM ak er aea .vuro •or (a) •1 lM ..a a .eel aaPaar. a r,mr..e .en r,a a 1lnlMW M rtl. a maxla i s m an ulaliMYaO as. meal P.O.M,t01 lot A.a zaz .er. (ta.7n ar.) lo< oon.e•� .Oa�ltlny A a••al 2a1. S410. a1. 3 5.25a al. zsjm arR3oe74SIf. •4,122ar. 4 Toll lot Co ways 37.M If. (33.9X) 46.•SD ae. (yt6>n Paey ides 13 ae+a.a Awyeatkn II- . 1.2 you/s 1t DYPoq a 140, a 1 . SW ia/1.2 you o qlv. mel — 1 - la . w slag e.a a•aa• m.1 COPYRIGHT 01994. 199 00MRIM 03mmw BIVFDIS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED_ '2S 0 z �Y z mmm F oo$m C m m O �gm U �s z N U a d x U .ri v �W � Ty, 1� O E. E4 4C" W O W i z a a d G. W z 4-4 W � a a 2 a z a d Ex -I W N DnAWN LRB GJB 1' - 20' DA 12/29/94 94152 IIIHIMICT C-� oP 3 yPQ1{ PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 23, 1991 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tues- day, July 23, 1991 at 8:30 P.M., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Terry Sheahan, Catherine Peacock, William Craig, Ann Pugh, David Austin Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; John Gie- bink, Charles Brush, Sonny Audette, Paul Adams 1. Other business a. Mr. Weith said the Commission's 7/26/88 approval for White Rock Point expires on 7/26/91. The subdivision regulations allow the Planning Commission to approve, after public hearing, an extension up to 2 additional years if applicant shows they have been diligently pursuing construction or further permits. Mr. Weith said a request has been received and he will warn a hearing for 8/27/91. b. Mr. Weith said that Mr. Farrell no longer wants the Commission to visit the Allenwood property to view the proposed future boat access as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. Instead, Mr. Farrell will be suing the City. Mr. Weith said he will present what information he has to the Commission for them to further evaluate the proposed boat access. Mr. Burgess said the commission should also re-evaluate the other "unresolved" issues including the land use change on Old Farm Road and pro- posed roadway over the Lake Buick property. 2. Site Plan application of Paul Adams for construction of a 12,000 square foot. buildiDE for wholesale. warehouse, distribu- tion use. lot 42. Airport Parkway Mr. Adams presented the plan and said the only change is to delete one of the earlier proposed hydrants. The Fire Chief does not have a problem with that. Mr. Weith said the zoning of the adjacent property has been changed since the last approval and that now a setback variance is required. He said due to the topography of the site, a variance should be justified. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Paul Adams of P.G. Adams, Inc.. for construction of a 12,000 square foot building for wholesale, warehouse, dis- tribution use as depicted on a 5 page set of plans, page one entitled "Ethan Allen Farms, Lot 42, South Burlington, Vermont. Site and Utilities Plan. "prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn. Inc.. and dated August 1990, last revised 7/16/91, with the following stipulations: 1 PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 23, 1991 1. This approval is conditioned on the granting of a setback variance by the Zoning Board of Adjustment. 2. The applicant shall post prior to permit a $7,200, 3-year landscaping bond. The landscape plan shall be revised prior to permit to show the second hydrant. removed. 3. The applicant shall contribute 880 toward long range improv- ments to the Airport Parkway/Ethan Allen Drive/Shamrock Road intersection. This fee shall be Paid Prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 4. All lighting shall be downcasting, shielded luminaire and shall not cast light beyond the property line., 5. The gravel parking lot shall not be paved without prior approval by the Planning Commission. Impacts of runoff shall be addressed if paving is proposed. 6. Two full sets of the revised Plans shall be submitted to the City Planner Prior to permit. 7. The zoning building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously. 3. Discussion with Director of Public Works, Sonny Audette regarding the Street Department Capital Plan Mr. Audette presented the 5-year construction plan. Of particu- lar concern is the rebuild of Kennedy Drive from Dorset Street to Williston Road. Mr. Craig said that the Commission has been struggling with the Kennedy Drive/Route 16 and Williston Road/Route 116 intersec- tions. A .recent traffic study indicated that substantial improvements will soon be necessary for these intersections. Mr. Audette said the Kennedy Drive/Route 116 intersection is a high priority with the State and should be improved within the next two years. In regards to Williston Road, it is 75% owned by the City. It can probably be incorporated into the Williston road improvement project. The Planning Commission indicated that they would like Mr. Au- dette to work with Mr. Weith to determine which improvments are necessary and could be paid for through development impact fees. This list should include a time schedule. 2 j State of Vermont WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Case #: WW-4-0380-1 Environmental Protection Rules Applicant: Paul G. Adams Effective September 10, 1982 Address: 1800 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 This project, consisting of constructing a 4,800 square foot addition to the building previously approved in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0380 and which is located on Lot 42 of Ethan Allen Farms located off Airport Parkway in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4CO643. GENERAL 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106 or 658-2199), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Job No. 94152 Sheet C-1 "Site Plan" dated 12-29-94 last revised 2- 14-95 prepared by Champlain Consulting Engineers and which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 3. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for public buildings under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0380-1 Page 2 4. A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. 5. In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and be subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. 6. All conditions set forth in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit #WW-4-0380 dated April 29, 1991 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 14th day of April, 1995. William C. Brierley, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Act 250 Coordinator -Louis Borie Water Supply Division Department of Labor and Industry Champlain Consulting Engineers State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voioe 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD April 5, 1995 Paul G. Adams 1890 Airport Parkway South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Applicant: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division ill West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802)879-6563 Subject: WW-4-0380-1 ; Ethan Allen Farms Lot 42 4800sf addition to prev approved commercial bldg no inc. mun. w/ons. sew. 2.52A located Airport Parkway in South Burlington, Vermont. We received your completed application for the referenced permit on 03/28/95, including a fee of $100 paid for by Check Number 0227. This application falls under the Water/Wastewater: Less than 500 GPD Program Area, and under the Performance Standards for this program area, we have 30 days of 'in-house' time for our review of your application. If we need further information from you in order to reach a decision on your application, the time we wait for your submittal of that information does not count against the allowable in-house time specified in the performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 30 days in-house, please contact this office. Please note that this does not constitute receipt of your application under the requirements of Act 250. If you have questions relating to Act 250 jurisdiction, a District Coordinator may be reached at 879-6563. Sincerely, l Administrative Secretary c South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Champlain Cons. Engr Chlorine Free 100% Recycled Paper Regional Office - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 16, 1995 Greg Bombardier Champlain Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 453 Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1890 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Bombardier: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on February 14, 1995. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si cerely, „� J e Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 16, 1995 Greg Bombardier Champlain Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 453 Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1890 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Bombardier: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the February 14, 1995 Planning Commissoin meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. erely, Job Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encl PLANNING COMMISSION 14 February 1995 page 13 beapprovedbythe City Planner rior to installation. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occu anc com liance permit, the a licant shall replace the four building mounted floodli hts with downcastin and shielded fixtures a roved b the City Planner. 7. The zoning permit shall be obtained within six months or this approval is null and void. 8. The ap ance from building. licant shall obtain the Administrative certificate of occupancy/com li- ficer prior to occupancv of the 9. An chan e to the approved siteplan shall require Planning Commission approval. Mr. Sheahan seconded. The motion assed unanimously._ Site plan application of Paul Adams to make site modifications and construct a 4800 sq. ft. addition to a 12,000 sq. ft. wholesale/warehouse/distribution building, 1890 Airport Parkway: Mr. Adams and Mr. Bombardier said they have a tenant using the front of the building and a prospective tenant who will require more space than what is left, so they need to expand the building. Mr. Burgess noted the Zoning Board granted a variance for setback requirements. Mr. Bombardier noted that none of the landscaping was done from the original project. Mr. Adams said they have added landscaping to the plan to make up for the $800 shortfall. They will also put in a bike rack. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan a plication of Paul Adams to make site modifications and con- struct a 4 800 s . ft. addition to a 12,000 sq. ft. wholesale warehouse distribution building_, 1890 Airport Parkwav, as de icted on a three a e set of plans a e one entitled_ "Paul G. Adams Pro ert , Ethan Allen Farms - Lot #42 Site Plan South Burlington, Vermont" re ared b _Champlain Cons ultin En ineers dated 12/29/94, last revised 1/31/95, with the following stipu- lations: 1. Any previous a royals and stipulations affectinq the sub'ect ro erty which are not superseded by this a roval shall remain in effect. 2. The a licant shall ost a $3 000 landscape bond prior to PLANNING COMMIS JN 14 February 1995 page 14 issuance of a zonin permit. three years to assure that the �ood chance of survivin . and shall remain in effect for scapinq takes root and has a 3. An new exterior li htin or change in existin_g li_qhtinq shall consist of downcastinq shielded fixtures so as not to cast light 4. The lan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning.p2rmit to show the changes listed below and shall requireapproval of the City Planner. Three co ies of the__appr2ved revised site lan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to either add additional lantin s or increase size of ro osed lantin s to meet the minimum requirement. 5. For ur ose of calculatin re uired road impact fees under the South Burlin ton Impact Fee Ordinance the Planninq Commission estimates that the proposedaddition will enerate 3.6 additional vehicle tri ends durinq the P.M. eak hour. 6. The a licant shall obtain a zoninq ermit within six months or this ---a roval is null and void. 7. Theapplicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occu anc Com li- ance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the new addition. 8. An change to the site plan shall re uire a roval b the South Burlin ton Plannin Commission. Mr. Sheahan seconded. The motion assed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 10:45 pm. Clerk P.G. ADAMS, INC. 1215 Airport Parkway S. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 862-8664 FAX (802) 863-4709 TO City of South Burlington > WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ _ LIETTIJ OF "TD LaGvMEOUTR& DATE 3 / 1 / 9 5 JOB NO. ATTENTION Raymond Belair RE: the following items: Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 2/23/95 Landscape bond in amount of $3,000.00 for 1890 Airport Parkway. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE __19_ REMARKS ❑ Resubmit_ copies for approval ❑ Submit_ copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO_ SIGNED: Paul Adams PRODUCT240-2 EeS Inc., Groton, Mm. olan_ if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. rY- ;t a F: Y MOTION OF APPROVAL PAUL ADAMS 2/14/95 I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Paul Adams to make site modifications and construct a 4,800 square foot addition to a 12,000 square foot wholesale/warehouse/distribution building, 1890 Airport Parkway, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one entitled "Paul G. Adams Property, Ethan Allen Farms - Lot #42, Site Plan, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Champlain Consulting Engineers, dated 12/29/94, last revised 1/31/95, with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The applicant shall post a $3000 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 3. Any new exterior lighting or change in existing lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior installation. 4. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised site plan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to either add additional plantings or increase size of proposed plantings to meet the minimum requirement. 5. For purpose of calculating required road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed addition will generate 3.6 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 6. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 7. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the new addition. 8. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Memorandum - Planning February 14, 1995 agenda items February 10, 1995 Page 11 Lighting: Exterior lighting consists of the following: --- four (4) 75 watt spotlights aimed at the building sign. --- four (4) building mounted 75 watt flood lights mounted over two (2) doors. These flood lights should be replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures approved by the City Planner. --- two (2) building mounted 75 watt metal halide lights with downcasting fixtures. --- five (5) pole mounted metal halide lamps of unknown wattage with downcasting shielded fixtures on nine (9) foot poles. 9) PAUL ADAMS - WAREHOUSE/STORAGE ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project consists of site modifications and constructing a 4,800 square foot addition to a 12,000 square foot wholesale/warehouse/distribution building approved on 7/23/91 (minutes enclosed). The applicant will be seeking a variance from the ZBA at their 2/13/95 meeting to allow the addition to project into the 65 foot setback requirement from a residential district boundary line. This property located at 1890 Airport Parkway lies within the IC District. It is bounded on the north by undeveloped property zoned residential, on the east and south by undeveloped property and on the west by several small businesses including an auto body shop. Access/circulation: Access to the property is via an existing 30 foot right-of-way from Airport Parkway. This right-of-way also serves as the access to the body shop. No changes proposed. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 15.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 41.6% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 11.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). The existing building and the proposed addition do not meet the 65 foot setback requirement from a residential district boundary. The ZBA previously granted a variance for the existing building and will review the applicant's request for a variance for the addition on 2/13/95. The building setback line along the northerly boundary should be 11 Memorandum - February 14, February 10, Page 12 Planning 1995 agenda items 1995 revised to reflect the 65 foot setback requirement. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement for the originalTI, building and the proposed addition, based on building costs, is $10,200 which is not being met. Plantings proposed are $850 short of the requirement and include Sugar Maple, White Pine, Viburnum and Arborvitae. Site plan should be revised to add additional plantings to meet the minimum requirement. Parking: A total of six (6) parking spaces are required and 10 spaces including one (1) handicapped space are being provided. A bike rack should be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. Traffic: ITE estimates that the proposed addition will generate 3.6 additional trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant � should be aware that the road impact fee would be approximately $250. Sewer: This property is served by on -site sewer. No allocation required. Lighting: Exterior lighting consists of the following: --- seven (7) building mounted 70 watt high pressure sodium lamps with downcasting fixtures. Dumpster: No dumpster proposed. 12 CHAMPLAIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS S7RUC17IRAL& FOUNDATIONS . SITE PLANNING • SANITARY& WATER February 20, 1995 Mr. Joe Weith CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Planning and Zoning Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: PLANNING APPROVAL CONDITIONS - 1890 AIRPORT PARKWAY ADDITION Dear Joe: Enclosed are 3 sets of revised project plans for Paul Adam's proposed addition at 1890 Airport Parkway. In accordance with the draft approval that we received from the planning commission on 2/14/95, the following revisions have been made: BICYCLE PARKING - a bicycle parking area has been incorporated into the site plan as noted on Sheet C-1. This location was chosen so as to keep the bicycles in view from the existing west facing building windows and keep the bicycles as far away as possible from the loading areas. LANDSCAPING - a complete planting list is summarized below and on plan sheet C-1. In ground prices for the various species are based on wholesale cost (provided by Ray Belair on 2/13/95) x 2.5 = planted cost. Item Qty. Subtotal, Planted Cost Sugar Maple 9 9 @ ($156.00 x 2.5) = $ 3,510. White Pine 33 33 @ ($ 36.50 x 2.5) = 3,011. Arrow Wood Viburnum 24 24 @ ($ 21.00 x 2.5) = 1,260. Dk. Amer. Arborvitae 37 37 @ ($ 21.00 x 2.5) = 1,942. Fragrant Viburnum 12 12 @ ($ 20.00 x 2.5) = 600. TOTAL PLANTINGS BUDGET ........................... $10,323. Based on your 2/10/95 planning memorandum concerning this project, I believe the minimum landscaping requirement is $10,200. 128 Prim Road, P.O. Box 453, Colchester, Vermont 05446 802 •863 • 8060 Please call me at (802)863-8060 if you require any further information to approve this project. Sincerely, CHAMPLAIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS Greg.Bbmbardier L .-) Enclosures Page - 2 m k City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 10, 1995 Greg Bombardier Champlain Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 453 Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1890 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Bombardier: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 14, 1995 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith� City Planner JW/mcp Encls PLANNING COMMISSION 16 October 1990 page 5 energy consumption. They have to move up the air conditioning units which are blocked. They can continue the second floor for the full length of the building. They also need more space for handling of trash. There will be no increase in retail square footage. Mr. _Austin_moved_the_Plannin ,Commission_a rove_the_Revised_Einal Plata lication-Of_F.E.P._Associatesr_c o -Champlain -Financial Group, -for _constrLict —ion -of -a-4800-s >_ft, _second_floor-addition for-stora e_ ur oses_to_an-existin _24,000_s ._ft._office/variety retail_buildin -as_de icted_on_a_ lan_entitled-"_O'Dell_Parkwa - Rome_Avenue_Inter.section,._South_Surlin ton _Vermont _Conce tual Entrance_Plan pre ared_b _Gra hic Construction_Mana ement_Ser- vices _Inc _and_dated_5 4 90 _last_revised_1D 12 90,_with_the_fo1- lowin _sti ulations: 1. _The_sti ulations_contained_in_the_6/12/90_a roval_and_not su erceded._b _this_a roval _shall remain-in-effect.- 2—This -aj2proval._is -conditioned _u on_ a_maximum_retail_floor_area of_14.500_s ._ft._as_re resented_b _the_a licant—An _increase in_retail_floor_area_shall_re uire_a roval_b _the_Plannin mission_ 3.._The_revised_final_ lat_shall_be_recorded_in_the_South_Burlin ton_land_records-within_90_da s_or_this_a roval_is_null_and_void, Ms,._Peacock_seconded,.__Motion_ assed_unanimousl t 6---Site- lan_a lication_of_Paul-Adams_of_P.G -Adams _Inc,_for construction_of_a_12r000.-s .._ft.._buildin _for_wholesale_warehouse distribution use _lot_42 _Air ort_parkwa Mr. Steele said this is lot 42 of the Ethan Allen subdivision. There will be a 24 ft. paved access into the site. They will eliminate 3 parking spaces from the plan, as recommended by the City Planner. There will be no filling over the edge of the bank and very minor site grading. Mrs. Maher asked why there is a re- taining wall. Mr. Steele said there is an elevated loading dock and they need to swing trucks around. Ms. Pugh asked what happens if in a year they decide to pave the gravel parking lot. Mr. Burgess said it can be stipulated that Commission approval is re- quired to do so. Mr. Burgess noted that Natural REsources suggests screening the residential area. Mr. Steele said he didn't thing it will adversely affect the housing. Mrs. Maher said she wouldrather see landscaing money used up front where it will be visible from the road. Mr. Weith suggested increasing the caliper of trees or adding a cedar hedge at the back. He suggested a hedge. PLANNING COMMISSION 16 October 1990 page 6 Mr. Steele said the sceptic system will be private but they haven't got a state permit yet. Mr. Weith said the City Engineer had reviewed the plans but made no comment. Members wanted an erosion control plan submitted.. Ms. Peacock asked if the existing drive to the auto body shop will be closed. mr Weith said that was part of a plan approved some time ago. They will close it and come in on the new access. Mr. Weith noted the Unsworth property to the north is warned for a zone change. A 65 ft. setback is required from a residential area and this application proposes 15 ft., but this proposal was sub- mitted before the last hearing on the zone change. State statute says even though a zone change doesn't affect site plan review, the Zoning Administrator may not be able to issue a permit unless approved by the City Council. The City Attorney says the project can be approved with such a stipulation. Mr --Austin -moved the -Planning -Commission - a roue_the.site_ lan-a - lication _of -Paul-Adams-of _P.G..-Adams,. _Inc, -for -const ruction -of -a 12 000_s .._ft.-buildin _ for _wholesale, -warehouse _distribution -use as -de icted_on-a-3= a e-set-of_ laps _ a e-one_entitled_"-Ethan Allen -Farms -L6t-42t -South _Burlin ton,_Vermon. _Site -and -Utilities Plan -pre ared-b -Fitz atrick_Llewell n -Inc _and-dated_Au gust 1990 _with-the_followin -sti ulations; 1.-The_a plicant-shall ost- rior-to- ermit_a_$2 200 - 3- ear landsca in -bond. The_ lan-shall-be-revised_ rior-to- ermit_to show-a-cedar_hed a_on_the-north-side-of-the_buildin 2_-The-plan _shall -be -revised- rior_to_ er.mit-to_show-th e_followin __a. -The -rear _ arkin _area_r.educed-in-size_and_moaed_further_awa from_the_ed e-of-the-bank-and-the_northerl _ ro ert _line: b-_The_sewer-easement_for_tbe_line-servin _Colchester_if_the easement_ oes_over_the_sub'ect- ro ert .. c._A_draina e_inlet_and_ i in _near-the-intersection_of_the_ac= cess_road-and _Air ort_Parkwa ,_if-recammended_b _the-Cit En ineer.. 3,-The_a licant-shall-contribute-,$880._toward_lon - ran e_im rove= ments-to -the _Air art-Parkwa /Ethan-Allen_Drive/Shamrock_Road_in= tersection _-_This_fee -shall.-be_ aid_ rior-to_issuance_of-a building_permit- 4--The_Plannin ..Commission-notes,that -the _a lication_for-the._ ro= 'ect_was_filed_after-an initial- ublic_notice_b _tlae-Plannin _Cam- PLANNING COMMISSION 16 October 1990 page 7 mission_of_a_Zonin ..Ordinance_amendment_that_would_increase-the setback_re uirement_alon _the_northerl-boundar _of_the_sub_'ect ro ert _from_15_feet-to_65_feet,.__Therefore,_this_a roual_is ranted_sub'ect_to_com liance-.with_the_re uirements_of_24_V-S AA.. Section-4443tcl,._if -.the_Administr.ative_Officer_fi.nds_them_a - �licable.. 5,_The_ ravel_ arkin _lot_shall_not-be aved_without_ rfor_a - roval_b _the_Plannin Commission.__Im acts_of_runoff_shall_be addressed_if_ avin _is- ro osedr 6r_An-erosion control_ lan-shall_be_submitted_ rior_to ermit_for approval: 7__The_buildin _ ermit-shall-.be_obtained--within-6-months_or_this approval -is -null -and -void.. Ms__Pugh_seconded, Motion_ assed_unanimousl 7. Site_ lan_a lication-of_Woodlands_Mini-Golf,_Inc,._for_5 000 s ,_ft,_of_indoor_recreation_use_in_con'unction_with_a roximatel 79,000_s ._ft._of_industrial_warehousin _use, -Woodland _Commons,. Kimball -Avenue, Mr. O'Brien said they want to install an 18-hole mini -golf course and small party area for children's parties. There would be about 20 seats in the facility. 7 parking spaces are required. The ex- terior of the building will not be changed. There would be 1 or 2 employees. Mr. Weith noted outdoor storage behind unit 20 which Mr. Palmer will remove. Also, storage in trucks by one of the tenants will go to -the Zoning Board next week. Mrs. Maher felt this an not an appropriate use in this setting. Mr. Burgess noted a letter of concern from Mr. Press. Mr. Press was present and said parking is already very crowded. He is a tenant 2 units down and foresees a lot more cars coming and going. Mr. Weith said he couldn't find a standard for mini -golf use so he based his figures on the 20 seats in the party area. Mr. Maher suggested continuing the application for 2 weeks until the applicant has been to Zoning. If Zoning approves it, she suggested the applicant come in with a parking plan. Mr. Press said he is also concerned with traffic on Kimball Ave. It is very bad now and he is concerned with cars blocking the STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: Paul G. Adams ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION #4 APPLICATION #4C0643-12A April 12, 1995 Rl�TP Y (1F A pPF A R A NrE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources, State of Vermont, by and through its attorney, Kurt Janson, Esq., in the above -captioned matter. PRE -HEARING COMMENTS Criterion 1(G) - WETLANDS Cathy O'Brien, Assistant Wetlands Coordinator with the Water Quality Division, reports that she will be conducting a site visit to determine whether there are wetlands issues that will need to be addressed. Ms. O'Brien will provide comments following her site visit. She can be reached at 241-3762. Criteria 9(F) and 9(J) - ENERGY CONSERVATION and PUBLIC UTILITIES Stuart Slote, Demand -Side Management Specialist with the Department of Public Service (DPS), has reviewed the application and finds there are some unresolved energy efficiency issues which need to be addressed prior to the issuance of a permit. To assure that the proposed development reflects the best available technology for efficient use. generation, conservation and recovery of energy, the applicant should address the following measures: 1) Provide specifications for the energy management system and thermostats. 2) Provide plans and specifications for interior lighting systems and controls, including lamp type, wattage, ballasts, and watts per sq. ft. The Dps recommends the installation of interior fluorescent lights with electronic ballasts and T-8 lamps and LED exit signs. 3) Provide plans and specifications for HVAC systems, including AFUE (annual fuel utilization efficiency). Application #4C0643-12A April 12, 1995 Adams Page 2 4) Provide plans and specifications for hot water heating systems, including E.F. (energy factor) and use of heat reclamation from refrigeration systems, if appropriate. The DPS recommends the installation of a time clock. 5) Describe energy efficiency consideration in any proposed loading docks/overhead doors. Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. (VGS) and Green Mountain Power Corporation (GMP) have programs to assist customers in evaluating equipment options relative to energy efficiency and load management. For information about the availability of energy efficiency programs, the DPS recommends that the applicant contact Bob Heryford, Workplace New Construction Program Administrator for VGS, at 863-4511, and Ken Couture, Commercial New Construction Program Administrator for GMP, at 655-8529. The DPS requests that the applicant address these outstanding items and submit a response to the DPS for review and approval prior to the issuance of a land use permit. If the applicant does not believe a particular measure is warranted, the applicant may submit information demonstrating that the measure is not applicable, or that an alternative measure is acceptable. All responses should be directed to Mr. Slote at (802) 828-4038, Vermont Department of Public Service, State Office Building, Montpelier, Vermont 05620-2601. Dated April 12, 1995, at Waterbury, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources By G�✓' . /�� J is A. Caffry, E CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Leah LaRock of Natural Resources, sent a copy of the Comments dated April 12, 1995 regarding postage prepaid, to the following: Paul G. Adams 1890 Airport Parkway South Burlington, VT 05403 Greg Bombardier Champlain Consulting Engineers PO Box 453/12g Prim Road Colchester, VT 05446 Margaret Picard, City Clerk Chair, City Council Secretary, of the Planning Division of the Agency foregoing Entry of Appearance and Pre -Hearing file #4C0643-12A (Paul G. Adams) by U.S. Mail, Chair, Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Date April 13, 1995 1 Waterbury, Vermont C-h c- )) _ LaRock retary CHAMPLAIN CONSULTIN( �GINEERS, P.C. Bayside Squar,- . 336 Malletts Bay Avenue COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 863 - 8060 TO G�1 ��� SC . �//2 i✓-7oicJ S 7S i ' ST �30 ,y�uitJC�� U71- 4e�sy-ee WE ARE SENDING YOU )4ttached ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter L IE77E)OF 7MM S W77/a L DATE JOB NO, I ATT TION� /c /V ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints Tans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order }�'>/2r,�/ 7��� /G COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION L 1 g.S .0 ser'5 G/ G Z G THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval or your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Make corrections noted ❑ Amend and resubmit ❑ Rejected see remarks 19 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO CHAMPL CONSU 16 GI S SIGN �✓ If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us a ce. ADAMS, Paul 1890 Airport Parkway Area zoned I-C District. Abuts R-4 District - rezoned 1/28/91 (from I-C District to R-4 District). Section 19.104(c) requires a 65 foot setback with a 15 foot buffer strip (landscaped). Proposed 601x200' structure = setback 15 feet (uses warehousing, wholesale, etc.). Lot contains 2.52 acres, no frontage - 30 feet right-of-way off Airport Parkway. 2 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Regula- tions and Chapter 117. Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment wi(I hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Munici- pal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Ver- mont, on Monde August 12, 1991 at 7:00 PM to consider the following: of and Jhn Appeal Gerald Larkin seeking approval from Section 11.50 Planned Commer- cial Development sub sec- tion 11.502 (b) Mufti -family units of the South Burling- ton Regulations. Request is for permission to con- struct 150 multi -family units In 7 buildings in con- junction with 40,000 square feet of retail area, a 20,000 square foot mov- ie theater on a parcel con- taining 32 acres, located Off Shelburne Road rear Of South Burlington Chrysler -Plymouth. #2 Appeal of Peter Val Predaseeking a variance from Section 18.00 Di- mensional Requirements and Section 19.05 Condi- I tional use expansion of ' the South Burlington Reg- ulations. Request Is for permission to construct a 16 x 50' car wash to within nine (9) feet of the required rear yard, lo- cated at Budget Rent-A- Car, 700 Airport Parkway. #3 Appeal of Lawrence - H. Press seeking a varf- ante from Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to con- struct an 8' x 8' mud room to within twenty one (21) feet of the required front yard, located at 29 Meadow Road. #4 Appeal of Paul Adams seeking a variance from Section 19.104 (c) Land- scaped buffer require- ment of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 60' x 200' structure to within fifteen (15) feet of the northerly side yard (minimum set- back 65 feet) which abuts a residential district, on a lot containing 2.5 acres, located at g890 Airport Parkway. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer July 27, 1991 City of South Burlington Application to Board of Adjustment Date July 23, 1991 Applicant Paul Adams, P.G. Adams Inc Address 1215 Airport Pkwy., Owner, leasee, agent So. Burlington, Vermont Telephone # 862-8664 Official Use APPLICATION # HEARING DATE FILING DATE 7L2SIJz FEE AMOUNT $30.00 Landowner Paul Adams Address South Burlington Tel # x 6 z - n h 6 4 Location 1. and description of property 2.52 acre, "Lot 42", off Airport Pkwy behind Daniel's Auto Body, K.C. T.V./Video, and Ashline Construction Type bf application (check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officb ( ) request for a conditional use ( X ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month`;(second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisment must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) mays prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provi,s'ions of zoning ordinance in question 19.104 C. "Buffer Strip" - Side yard setback increased to 65' between industrial/commercial use and Residential District Reason for appeal Side yard variance due to the recent rezoning of the adjoining property; ' plans' indicate required 15' landscaped buffer The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagram¢ (drawn to scale) traffic data and any other 'additional information which will serve as support�videice to the Board. August 12 1991 g � �. Hearing Date Signature of Appe�lan Pau A ams Do not write below this line _____ __ ______________ SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Tit16 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington,'Vermont on (Day of week) at to consider the following: (month and date) Time Appeal of seeking a from Section of the South Burlington Regulations. d. Request is for permission to I FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN IN 00RATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO WE ARE SENDING YOU ched ❑ Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS 1 f LIEUMEa 01F URROSMO TUL i ❑ Samples following Items: ❑ Specifications ONE MAMIM7 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US j COPY SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-1 Ee$ 1z, Gdm, Mea. 01471. It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify u at ❑ Samples following Items: ❑ Specifications ONE MAMIM7 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US j COPY SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-1 Ee$ 1z, Gdm, Mea. 01471. It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify u at ........................................... ..... ..................., ............ ......... / l e � low i � ��=��.► �i K G� L/pU "X�oc) " 44 04i d&.0.4a*,& l�JpVt-e 1� w.o _...._.. M E M O R A N D U M IU. SuuLii Burlington Planning Conunission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: July 23, 1991 agenda items Date: July 19, 1991 ** JOINT DISCUSSION WITH CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE EXTENSION OR INTERIM ZONING WILL BEGIN AT 7:30 P.M. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 8:30 P.M. FOLLOWING THE DISCUSSION ** Enclosed is a memo from Chuck Hafter to the Council regarding SEQ Zoning. 2) PAUL ADAMS, LOT 42 As discussed at the last meeting, this application received Planning Commission approval on October 16, 1990 (minutes en- closed). The applicant failed to obtain a zoning permit within the 6 month time frame, and therefore the approval expired. The applicant is resubmitting the application for a new approval. All of the conditions contained in the approval have been met. The only change proposed is to delete one of two proposed fire hydrants. This is acceptable to the Fire Chief (see enclosed memo). Setbacks: Since the 10/16/90 approval, the zoning of the adjoin- ing parcel to the north owned by Ray Unsworth was changed to Residential 4. Section 19.104(c) of the zoning regulations requires a 65 foot setback for commercial uses from residential zones. The proposed building is only 15 feet from the residen- tial zone. This plan can be approved only with a setback vari- ance granted by the Zoning Board. I do not believe it will be difficult to obtain a variance. Due to the topography of the site (i.e. very steep bank), it would be extremely difficult to construct a building within the 65 foot setback and other setback requirements. Additionally, an old quarry exists between the applicant's property and the developa- ble area on the Unsworth property. Therefore, the proposed building location would not negatively impact a residential development. 1 Memorandum - Planning July 23, 1991 agenda items July 19, 1991 Page 2 I recommend that the Planning Commission approve the application subject to the granting of a setback variance by the Zoning Board. 3) SONNY AUDETTE, CAPITAL PLAN Enclosed is the Street Department's 5 year construction plan Capital Plan as approved by the council last spring. Sonny Audette will be present at the meeting to discuss the plan and answer questions. Sonny and I have been talking over the last few months about presenting the plan to the Commission so that the Commission is informed of the time line for certain roadway improvements. This will be an opportunity for the Commission to discuss proposed improvements to the Route 116/Kennedy Drive and Route 116/Williston Road intersection. 3) SEWER ALLOCATION POLICY Enclosed is the City's sewer allocation policy. A couple of weeks ago, the Commission decided to review the policy and consider revising the policy to allow the exchange of allotments for reserved sewer capacity between separate lots. This review of the policy was initiated by Lochmore Associates regarding Lakewood Commons development. Enclosed is a letter from Charles Brush of Lochmore Associates, Inc. addressing this issue. Background Staff conducted research into the background of the sewer alloca- tion policy. It appears that the policy was first adopted by the Commission in August, 1978 and revised in January, 1983. The policy was never officially adopted by the Council, therefore, it is a Planning Commission policy. The City has a separate sewer ordinance which was officially adopted by the City Council in 1969 and last amended in June, 1980. The sewer ordinance does not address allocation of reserve capacity. Memorandum - Planning August 23, 1991 agenda items July 19, 1991 Page 3 Sewer allocation policy: As already mentioned, the sewer alloca- tion policy was last revised in January, 1983. Section 1 of the policy states that the policy "shall extend until the vote on the sewer bond issue (expected: May, 1984). At that time the policy shall be re-evaluated..." It appears the policy was never re- evaluated following the sewer bond issue in 1984. The existing policy should be officially readopted by the Commis- sion to clear up any confusion regarding Section 1. The policy also needs to be revised to reflect the current practice of granting sewer allocation which has developed over the years. Enclosed is a draft revision of the policy. Section 7 of the policy prohibits the exchange of reserved sewer capacity between parcels. The Commission indicated that this provision was included to prevent the creation of a market for the buying and selling of sewer capacity. The Commission was concerned with the potential for developers to get approval for projects, not for construction, but solely for the ability to sell sewer capacity. This provision would prohibit such prac- tices. Mr. Brush's letter highlights the benefits of allowing the trans- fer of approved sewer capacity. The City would not have to worry about developers getting approvals for the sole purpose of sell- ing sewer capacity since Bartlett's Bay is already at capacity. The Planning Commission may want to consider amending Section 7 to allow transfer of capacity within the Bartlett Bay service area only until such time as the plant is expanded. Other Communities Several communities in Vermont have adopted sewer allocation policies or ordinances which were officially adopted by the Board of Selectmen. In the Towns of Hartford and Williston, the poli- cies require the payment of fees to reserve the capacity for a certain period of time. If the projects are abandoned or do not receive State approval, a portion of the fees are returned. This system somewhat discourages the hoarding of sewer capacity. The Town of Hartford prohibits the transfer of sewer capacity between parcels. The Town of Williston allows such transfer only after approval by the Planning Commission. 3 Memorandum - July 23, 1991 July 19, 1991 Page 4 Planning agenda items Citv of South Burlington I recommend that the Council officially adopt a sewer allocation policy. This policy should be fashioned after the Towns of Hartford and Williston which requires the payment of fees to reserve capacity. I particularly like Hartford's which is actu- ally part of the Town's sewer impact fee policy. This issue should be addressed when we update the sewer impact fee (high on our things to do list). At this point in time, however, I recommend that the Planning Commission readopt its current policy as revised, until such time as an official policy is adopted. 5) REVISED PARKING LOT, CITY HALL As part of the Dorset Street project, a frontage road will be constructed along the front of the City Hall parking lot in order to provide access for the property on the corner of Dorset Street and the I-189 on -off ramp. As a result, 31 existing parking spaces will be lost. A new 31 space parking lot is planned on the south side of City Hall in order to replace the spaces to be lost (plan enclosed). Since this plan is part of the Dorset Street project, formal site plan approval is not necessary. This review will provide an opportunity for the Commission to make recommendations on the proposed design. Parking and circulation: The plan proposes 18 foot depths for the angled parking spaces and 20 foot wide aisle widths. These dimensions meet acceptable standards for angled parking. The aisle widths could actually be reduced further and still comply with accepted standards. The existing access road to the back parking lot should be wid- ened to at least 20 feet. Landscaping: An existing 25 foot wide dense planting of trees which currently exists between the access drive to the back parking lot and the lawn area on the south side of City Hall will be removed to make room for the new parking lot. The plan shows a 2 foot wide curb separating the access road from the new park- ing lot. 4 Memorandum - Planning July 23, 1991 agenda items July 19, 1991 Page 5 I recommend that the aisle widths be reduced to 17 feet and the proposed 2 foot wide curb widened to a 6 foot wide landscaped island. Several maple trees could be planted which would help shade the new parking lot and improve its appearance. Other: Handicapped spaces should be identified and ramps in- stalled in the proper locations. 6) MOST PRESSING NEEDS Enclosed is a memo from the CCRPC requesting the Planning Commis- sion to identify the 5 "most pressing needs" facing both the City and region. Provided below are my suggestions: Citv 1. Update zoning and subdivision regulations, to comply with 1991 Comprehensive Plan, including SEQ and City Center zoning. 2. Adopt Impact Fee Ordinance and Capital Budget and Program in accordance with State Statute. 3. Improve Shelburne Road and Williston Road. 4. Establish a City Center for South Burlington. 5. Computerize tax maps. Region 1. Adopt Regional plan. 2. Pursue funding and construction/implementation of regional transportation projects (i.e., Shelburne Road, Williston Road, Southern Connector, Circumferential Highway, South Burlington interchange, CCTA). 3. Strong regional economy. 4. Improve quality of and access to Lake Champlain. 5. Continue development of G.I.S. Department and service to communities. 5 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 t- PLANNER 658-7955 July 29, 1991 Paul Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont. 05403 Re: Zoning application Dear Mr. Adams: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, on Monday, August 12, 1991 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your zoning application. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1 Encl RW/mcp PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 i October 29, 1990 Paul Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning application Dear Mr. Adams: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, November 12, 1990 at 7:00 P.M. to consider our request for multiple use permit. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1 Encl RW/mcp ADAMS, Paul 1890 Airport. Parkway Area zoned I-C District. Section 13.10 Permitted Uses sub section 13.105, 13.106 and 13.111 allow for wholesale establishments, warehousing and storage distributions facility. Section 19.65 Multiple Uses - a maximum of -ten (10) uses proposed - Section 19.05 Conditional Uses applies. Proposed 60' x 200' building - approximately 1200 square feet per unit. Lot 2.52 acres served by 60 foot. right-of-way. /:: 2a,�� �✓Lr� .�' "'`.``-mod -- � �� a�..�O`�--Q.�-' i SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Reggulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlin ton Zoning Board of Adfustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Mu- nicipal offices, Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, No- vember 12, 1990 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: #1 Appeal of Paul G. Ad- ams seeking approval from Section 19.65 Mul- tiple uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for permission to construct a 60' x 200' building and occupy with a maximum of ten (10) uses (wholesale, ware- housing and storage -dis- tribution) on a lot containing 2.52 acres, lot 42 Ethan Allen Farm In- dustrial Park, Airport Parkway. #2 Appeal of Drake Ba kerles, Inc., Sam Mageed agent seeking approva from Section 19.65 Mul tiple uses of the Soutl Burlington Regulations Request Is for permissioi to occupy an existing structure as a retail outle and a warehouse-truc terminal d.b.a. Drake Ba kerles and Jason's Dr Cleaners, located at 37C Dorest Street. Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officei City of So' Burlington f Application to _ Ird of Adjustment Date 15 October 1990 John Steele Applicant FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated Owner, leasee, agent Address Williston,. Vermont Telephone # APPLI 'ION # HEARING DATE 15?'n _ ` 2`! // -/Z FILING DATE l'' - / 7 — 9 U FEE AMOUNT �Py c-S? .000"e-' 878-3000 Landowner Paul Adams, P.G. Adams Inc. Address 1215 Airport 'Parkway, South Burlingtot Location and description of property Lot 42 Ethan Allen__ Farms Commer is Subdivision Airport Parkway; behind Daniels Auto Body and KC TV & Video Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer.( X )request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question Article X:,;:, Section 19.65 "Multiple Use of Lots" Reason for appeal The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and any other additional information which will serve as s Board. ort evidence to the 12 November 1990 Hearing Date at ppe nt ------------------------ Do not w e below this line SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on �ZQ �d�, die- /sy6�t _ _'00 ,ru Day of Week /� to consider the following: Month and Date Time ./ Appeal of seeking from Section e__. Izt-Q.t VII of the South Burlington Regulati_ons.A Request is for permission to�- x— to O r,C e2cs e� � �-e��._e.-,�,,,� ��.�i � G�✓✓.l.�s� G2� � �GZ � A, _ /.e-�,., �e-.1, e VZ FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INC01"' Zes ATED Engineering and Planning - One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO LIE'TULJ OCR TURSEDUYU > WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover vi the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specificatio s ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ 'DESCRIPTION OF IFF0139,7117"MA /1i ����/►�r' l�. �_'/.���/� .ice THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted > �s requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE _ 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY PRODUCT 240-2 a Inc., Gr", Man. 01471. SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us City of S" h Burlington Application to and of Adjustment , Date 15 October 1990 John Steele Applicant FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated Owner, leasee, agent Address Williston,, Vermont J Telephone # APPL rTION # HEARING DATE FILING DATE FEE AMOUNT 878-3000 Landowner Paul Adams, P.G. Adams Inc. Address _1215 Airport 'Parkway,- South Burlingtc Location and description of property Lot 42 Ethan Allen Farms Commercial ibdivision Airport Parkway; behind Daniels Auto Body and KC TV & Video Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer.( X )request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question Article XY, Section 19.65 "Multiple Use of Lots" Reason for appeal The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale)affic data and any other additional information which will serve as s Board. p ort evidence to the 12 November 1990 Hearing Date at p1-e�1 nt ------------- Do not w i e below this line ----------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at Month and Date Appeal of seeking a Time Day of Week to consider the following: from Section of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to Iahv CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PIIONE NUMBER OF: a) Owner of Record Paul Adams, P.G. Adams Inc. 1215 Airport Parkway, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 b) Applicant Paul Adams, P.G. Adams Inc. 1215 Airport Parkway, .South Burlington, Vermont 05403 c) Contact Person FitzParick-Llewellyn Incorporated, John Steele 878-3000 Michael Dugan; Architect 878-0070 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Lot 42 Airport Parkway 3) PROPOSED USE (s) Wholesale, Storage and distribution, warehousing in "mixed industrial and Commercial District" (IC) 4) SIZE OF PROJECT: (i.e. Building Square Footage, #units, maximum parcel area: 109,798 sq.ft. height and #floors 12,000 sq.ft. 8 units, 30 feet high, one floor S) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (f u 11 and part time) : 24, (29 parking spaces) 6) LOT COVERAGE: Building 10.9 %; Building, Parking, Outside Storage: 38.2 % �) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings: $ 240,000 , Landscaping $ 3,960.00 Other Site Improvements: (Please list with cost) $ Paved entrance road (10,000) graveled parking ($15,00. Guard rail ($3,500) Lighting ($4,500) 9) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 1991 10) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 84 AWVTE 11) PEAK HOUR(s) OF OPERATION: Sam to 5pm ; am peak - 20 VTE,}pm peak-12 VTE 12) PEAK DAY (s) OF OPERATION: Mondav -Fridav >Q l IGNATURE OF APPLICANT FITZPATR I CK- LLEWELLYN INCC''7RATED Engineering and Planning /ices One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO D.1EUULJ OF -TMQUZDM0-TT=Q[L DATE J ME `' LIlii L� �1'l .� a f � > WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ElShop drawings �,jPrints Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ DESCRIPTION wmow, _ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Foy -your use El Approved as noted s requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY PRODUCT 240-1 � Inc., Groton, Mass. 01471. SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify ADAMS, Paul 1890 Airport Parkway Area zoned I-C District. Abuts R-4 District (rezoned 1/28/91) from I-C District to R-4 District. Section 25.108 Buffer strip. Required setback 65 feet with 15 feet maintained as a landscaped buffer. Existing structure 12,000 square feet, proposed addition 4,800 square feet. Original variance granted August 12, 1991. Lot 2.5 acres (109,772 square feet), no frontage, 30 foot right- of-way off Airport Parkway. Existing and proposed uses wholesale and warehousing. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 February 17, 1998 Ashley Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Landscaping at 1890 Airport Parkway Dear Ms. Adams: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that you must provide the City with a landscaping bond in the amount of $3325. This bond should be in effect for at least 18 months to cover two (2) growing seasons. Your landscaper, George Brady, informed us that he did plant the required dollar amount of landscaping at the rear of the building. He indicated that he had an "as -built" plan which he would give us to verify that the required value was indeed planted. To date, he has not provided us with that plan. The approved plan showed that an evergreen hedge was to be planted along the rear of the building. No evergreens were planted. Either the landscaping along the rear of the building must be replaced with the plantings shown on the plan or a revised plan must be submitted for approval by the Planning Commission. Please note that the zoning regulations require that a dense evergreen hedge be planted in this area because it is adjacent to a Residential District. Please let me know whether you plan on changing the landscaping or seek approval from the Planning Commission for a revised landscaping plan. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincereay, i Lymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 30, 1995 Mr. Paul G. Adams 1215 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Appeal, Lot #42 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Adams: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, February 13, 1995 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this hearing and be prepared to address the enclosed review criteria. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp Encl LEGAL NOTICES 1 *1. Appearl of Paul G. Adams seeking a variance from Section 25.108 Buf- fer strip and setback re- WG irements of the South Burlington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for per- mission to construct a 4,800 square foot addition to an existing 12,000 square foot building, lo- cated to within fifteen (15) feet of a residential dis- trict on a parcel con- tainingg 2.5 acres, located at 1890 Airport Parkway. M2. Appeal of Wakeman Industries, Michael Dugan agent seeking a variance from Section 26.00 Non- conformingg uses sub sec- tion 26.003 extension and Section 25.00 lot cover- age of the South Burling- ton Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct two (2) addi- tions (1660 square feet and 750 square feet) to a commercial building lo- Gated within a residential district. Proposed addi- tions Increase lot cover- age from thirty-eight (38) percent of the lot area to forty-six (46) percent, lo- cated at 1550 Williston Road. >l nUNOTM ON 140TICIE In aocordanoe with the South Burlington Zoning Re�tlons and Chapter 11 Title 24, V.S.A. the �Q! Zonirtg Board of I4�Nsa""rtt will told a public hearinq at the South ButWon Mu- nicipal Offices, Confer- enos Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Buriin Vermont on Monday. eb ruary 13, 1995 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: Continued Next Column M3. Appeal of Michael 3 Roberta Guerra seeking approval from Section 9.20 Conditional uses sub section 9.202 Day Care Center lit Section 26.65 Multiple uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for par - mission to convert an existing attached garage into a day care center (maximum 7 children) and enclose a 8'x13' patio to the rear of the garage RX a furnace room, in junction with an exists medical clinic located a 1540 Williston Road. So Appeal gtoofn C Y o South BBurn Hafter agent seeking proval from Section 7 Conditional uses sub- tlon 7.205 Municipal f ttyy of the South Burin Zoning Regulations. Rees ��{ quest is for permission tW construct a greenhouse) treatment facility/eduoa- tion structure containing 7875 square feet in OD junction with the existing - /wastewater treatment fatality known as the Bart- lett Bey Plant located at 15 Bartlett Bay Road. Plans are on file with the South Burlington Planning and Zoning Office, lo-' Gated at City Hall, 575� Dorset Street, South Bur- lington, Vermont. Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer January 28, 1995 Of i-ial Use City of Sou'h Burlington APPLICATION # > �oL/ Application to Board of Adjustment Date HEARING DATE 4C '9'S i /tom / FILING DATE Applicant��t�i 5 Gyp Owner, leasee, ��e nt FEE AMOUNT �Q el It 411", Address # 412 Telephone # Landowner �L�-�` C' flL�Gz�yy(�. Address Lon ation and description of propertyl�'d ,C.d Type of &tplication neck one 4/ ) appeal from decision (46f Administrative Officer( )request for a conditional use (✓ ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning grdinance in question oAa- er %yL-6h for appeal c%G c/Yt�Cy(�C. TGiL arc T r vz'YI r� yr v r 7 The owner or appl' ant should mit g with this application (8 copies plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and any other additional information which will serve as support evidence to the Board. /6�" - Hearing Date U Sllgnl&ture of Appellant C .G�yv1 Do not write below this line ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Day ,6f Week � 9J, at � � OV�'/Lf � to consider the following: Month and Date Time Appeal of-t'' t,• seeking a �/"from Section of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to -t�i`yca lit .i.o lsl v .fir �f -t s;: � G 4 -- Gt� c 4 44;t/ ISTRIBUTION 30X- Nv IN 25J.2� VV OUT 253.01 I DISPOSAL AREA LEGEND ,Ann r., I nN rnNr.9"Tr . ao' ayM1 ABANDONED CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND SLAB PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE' ---- ---- RICH T- OF- WA Y/EA SEMEN T LINE --------------------- EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTING FENCE LINE ---Dr+a1 OHW— EXISTING OVERHEAD WR£/UTILITY POLE — - - - - - - — BUILDING SETBACK LINE PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED GUARDRAIL • IRON PIN TO BE SET x UTILITY POLE H WATER VALVE PROPOSED LIGHT Ca:E N/F RAY UNS WORTH 8 x8" WOOD POSTS 6'-J' O.C. W/ STEEL - BEAM GUARDRAILS SEE DETAIL SHEET 2OF3 1:9. 72' / ////'rI /,/,/ it' ,,o / 10i 5' LOADING D OMDED FOR BAYS ''i ce ' '�% �� �� -; %:'%i / 4- ry 7 TtROUGH 10i�'% �'�%" �� :��%;' '�:' / • v \ i �% 'ice %�'%%%' '�' PARK/NC/ROADWAY UCHTS 175 �µy�ATT METAL HALIDE TYPE FM RECTAIJCULAR / �� =' %"%' �?•� % ��'!-i i ;� �� ONE WAY CUTOFF LUMINA/RE Ok 20' • ��.' SQUARE STEEL POLE, BLACK ������%'a•' �' ', �i� ��%ice'% � ''� ANODIZED FlNISH. GARDCO EH- ♦='_=''�i;'i:x•x� 14-1-FM-120-175MH-BLA •0 OR EQUAL / • =109,798 Sq. Ft. • 2.52 Acres _ l I J • 1 =11WIM LOCUS HIS _•`..�►•• NOTES E •-�� 1. Owner A licont: Paul G. Adams ry4'41-••j N/F JOHN BELTER / PP ' N 7� I215 Airport Parkway 05 South Burlington, Vermont, 05403 REMOVE AND REGRADE EXIS77NG PARKING ENTRANCE EXIS77NG LIGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED APPROVED NAEF, VOLK PROPERTY SITE PLAN SHEET S-I, 1-17-90 2. Lot Area: Z52 Acres J. Lot coverages: Building :12,000 sq.ft. t0.9x Parking :29,913 sq.ft. 27.2X Green Area:67,886 sq.ft. 61.8% Total Lot Coverage :41,9/J sq.ft. J8.2X 4. Perimeter property line information from plan entitled Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision - Overall Site Plan' by FitzPatrick Llewellyn Incorporated. Last revised dote 14 October 1988. 5. Topographic Information and existing features by FitzPotrick-Llewellyn Incorporated, surveyed during topographic survey June 1990 6. The presence of utility lines on site indicate the presence of a utility easement, no research was performed by this office. 6. 29 Total Parking Spoces; 28 spaces required. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET 1 u.E - 20 tt ETHAN ALLEN FARMS VNeURIgCrO LOT 42 SITE AND UTILITIES PLAN a gC n— 90064 FUZpj%U LL E w E LLY INCORPORATED AUG 1990 Z;, 0• J49J WILUSTON VERMONT 1 v' J 77 y PLANNING COMMISSION 13 MAY 1986 PAGE 2 toward the ravine, not toward Kirby Road. 4. A sewer allocation of 450 gallons per day per lot is made in accordance with the South Burlington sewer policy. 5. It is the applicant's responsibility to record the final plat with the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval shall be invalid. It must be approved �2y the Planner and singed �2y the Chairman or Clerk of the Planning Commission prior to recording. 6. The southeast corner of the 2.1 acres may be deeded to the adjacent property owner, Joan Swan. The Plat must be amended prior to recording. Mr. Belter seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Mr. Bevins of 36 Duval asked if it would be possible to clear and seed some of the city land that adjoins his, to even out his property. Mr. Jacob said he was sure it would be OK and suggested Mr. Bevins talk with Mr. Szymanski. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Final Plat application of John Belter for continuation of the industrial subdivision with lots #9-21 at Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Park (repeated due to applicant's failure to meet filing deadlines) Mr. Belter stepped down during this discussion. Mrs. Lafleur said the application is identical to the one passed except one of the stipulations on the last approval was the dedication of the 5.25 foot wide strip on either side of Ethan Allen Drive. It is not shown on the plan but the deed is already in the City's possession. She added that work on Ethan Allen Dr. will start in 1987-88. Sonny Audette is applying for special funds for fixing dangerous inter- sections. Ms. Peacock asked for some background on the project as she had not been on the Commission when it was passed. Mr. Jacobs provided a brief summary. Mrs. Maher moved that the S. Burlington Planning Commission approve the Final Plat application of John Belter for the 13 lot industrial subdivision as depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm, Industrial Subdivision lots 9-21" as prepared by Warren A. Robenstien, dated August, 1985 with the following stipulations: 1. On -site sewage disposal systems for each lot shall be in- stalled in the front yards so that connection to a future sewer main in Ethan Allen Drive is possible. 2. The 5.25 foot wide dedication for future street widening PLANNING COMMISSION 13 MAY 1986 PAGE 3 shall be shown to extend to the southeast corner of lot 48. Revised plans shall be filed with the City Planner within 30 days — — 3. The sum of 5000 shall be paid prior to permit for the im- provements to Ethan Allen Drive. It m_jjbe paid in 1000 in- stallments upon permit for the first 5 lots in this sub- division. 4. It is the applicants responsibility to record the revised Final Plat with the City Clerk within 90 days or this ap- proval shall be null and void. It must be approved 1?y the Planner and signed 12y the Chairman or Clerk of the Planning Commission prior to recording. Mrs. Hurd seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 4. Site Plan application of Dave Desautels, agent for Partner Tire, for construction of a 10,200 sq. ft. building on lot #3 of the Fassett's 3-lot subdivision, 1785 Shelburne Rd. Mr. Desautels explained this will be a 3-tenant building, all automotive related. The multiple use has Zoning Board approval. There will be a common drive between lots 2 & 3, and this building will use that driven Mr. Desautels said the use is a relatively low traffic generator. They expect 16 or 17 cars maximum in a peak hour. Mrs. Lafleur said the traffic overlay zone allows 89 cars. She noted that any change in use would have to come back to the Commission. Mrs. Maher asked how developers' projections are checked. Mrs. Lafleur said she uses ITE data. In this case, there are no comparable businesses, but specialty retail would generate 23 cars per peak hour, hardware 53, and a service station 31. She didn't think there would be a problem in exceeding the traffic overlay with the proposed uses. Mr. Desautels added he checked with the Partner Tire people and the prospective tenants on their present figures. He noted that no gas will be dispensed on the site. Regarding parking, Mr. Desautels noted the brook goes through the site. He felt the parking shown on the plan would be enough without having to cross the brook for additional parking. They agreed to review the situation after a year to see if the additional parking is necessary. Mrs. Lafleur felt the landscaping plan should be revised with more moved up front. Mrs. Maher suggested substituting some- thing for the flowering crab which are not doing well in many parts of town. Mrs Lafleur also noted a Wagner, Heindel & Noyse study will be required. Mr. Desautels advised they City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 3, 1995 James Knapp Gravel & Shea P.O. Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Lot #21, Ethan Allen Industrial Subdivision Dear Mr. Knapp: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I have reviewed and discussed with the City Attorney the issue of Lot #21 and whether its configuration as shown in map volume 252, page 43 is considered approved by the City. It is not clear whether this plat was recorded with the knowledge of the Planning Department, however, the City Attorney has advised that the Planning Commission in effect approved the present configuration of Lot #21 (as shown in map volume 252, page 43) when they approved a site plan for development of Lot #42. Lot #42 is the adjoining property to the north which shares a boundary with Lot #21 and which was also reconfigured when the above referenced plat was recorded. I am planning to resolve this issue by having the Planning Commission formally adopt a Resolution which officially approves the configurations of Lots #21 and #42 as shown in map volume 252, page 43. I hope to have this Resolution voted on at the April 18, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. Ai cerely JveWeith, Planner JW/mcp cc: Steve Stitzel Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 26, 1995 James Knapp Gravel & Shea P.O. Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Lot #21, Ethan Allen Industrial Subdivision Dear Mr. Knapp: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of a resolution which was approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission on April 25, 1995. The resolution officially approves the configurations of lots #21 and #42 of the Ethan Allen Industrial Subdivision as shown in map volume 252, page 43 of the City's land records. e Weith, ity Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl CHARLES T, SHEA STEPHEN R. CRAMPTON STEWART H. McCONAUGHY ROBERT B. HEMLEY WILLIAM G. POST, JR. CRAIG WEATHERLY JOHN R. PONSETTO NORMAN WILLIAMS JAMES E. KNAPP DENNIS R. PEARSON D. RUSSELL MORGAN GRAVEL AN D SHEA ATTO R N EYS AT LAW 109 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 1049 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 August 27, 1985 Mrs. Jane S. Bechtel City Planner 57.5 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Belter Subdivision of Industrial Lots 9-21 Dear Jane: TELEPHONE 658-0220 AREA CODE 802 CLARKE A. GRAVEL COUNSEL I enclose copies of a proposed offer of dedication and warranty deed concerning future widening of Ethan Allen Drive, a quit claim deed and transfer return to any interest the Belters may have in that triangular parcel of land located between Ethan Allen Drive and Shamrock Road, and an easement deed and transfer return concerning a stormwater drainage easement, all pursuant to the directives requested by the South Burlington Planning Commission in its proposed approval of the above -captioned subdivision. I am this day sending copies to Attorney Spokes for his review. I assume I will hear from him in the next week or two, giving his blessing or suggested changes, and then will have John Belter deliver the originals to you. Cordially, G V L and SHEA ,CX ,5tephen R. Crampton SRC:wsb Enclosures CC: Richard A. Spokes, Esq. (w/enclosures) John H. Belter, Jr. (w/enclosures) IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION AGREEMENT by and between JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER of South Burlington, Chittenden County and State of Vermont (hereinafter jointly referred to as "Owners") and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON (herein- after referred to as "City"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City's Planning Commission has approved a final subdivi- sion plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Plat Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission includes a condition that owners commit to and convey a five and twenty-five hundredths foot (5.25') strip of land on both sides of Ethan Allen Drive for purposes of widening Ethan Allen Drive, all as set forth in Final Plat Review of "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision Lots 9-21" dated September _, 1985; and WHEREAS, the above described lands and/or interest therein are to be dedicated to the City free and clear of all encumbrances, pursuant to said final approval and final plat; and WHEREAS, Owners have delivered to the City appropriate deeds of con- veyance for the above described lands and/or interest therein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the final approval of the City's Planning Commission and for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. Owners herewith deliver to the City a deed of conveyance, an unexecuted copy of which is attached as Exhibit A, said delivery constituting a formal offer of dedication to the City to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such offer of dedication by the legislative body of the City. 2. Owners agree that said formal offer of dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City of any time. 3. This irrevocable offer of dedication shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all assigns, grantees, successors and/or heirs of Owners. Dated this day of , 1985. In Presence Of: John H. Belter, Jr. Joyce N. Belter STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEU COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County, this day of , 1985, personally appeared JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER, and they acknowledged this instrument, by them signed, to be their free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public In Presence Of: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At South Burlington, in said County, this day of , 1985, personally appeared , duly authorized agent of the City of South Burlington, and he/she acknowledged this -2- instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the City of South Burlington. Before me, [Belter Irrevocable - PS13L] Notary Public -3- Exhibit A WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that, JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER of South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantors, in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantee, by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Parcel One: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and northerly of the existing sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends from the southwesterly corner of Lot 9 to the southeasterly corner of Lot 13. Said strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Parcel Two: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and southerly of the existing sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends from the northwesterly corner of Lot 14 to the northeasterly corner of Lot 18. Said strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Parcel Three: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and southwesterly and southerly of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends from an iron pin marking the intersection of the southwesterly sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way with the easterly sideline of the Shamrock Road right-of-way in a southeasterly and thence easterly direction along the existing southerly sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way to an existing monument marking the northwesterly corner of property now or formerly of Berard. Said strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Parcel Four: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and northeasterly of the existing sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends across the entire frontage of Lot 19 from said Lot's south- westerly corner to its southeasterly /ain rner (a distance of 504.21 feet). Said strip is depicted on a entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Included with this conveyance are all improvements located within, over, or under said roadway strip including, but not by way of limita- tion, paving, curbing, base preparations, hydrants, and all utility mains and appurtenances thereto. The small strips of property conveyed herein are a small portion of the property conveyed to the within Grantors by Warranty Deed of Rene J. and June A. Berard dated May 8, 1979 and recorded in Volume 148 at Pages 225-228 of the South Burlington City Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation, its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; And the said Grantors, JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER, for ourselves and our heirs, executors and administrators, do covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, we are the sole owners of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; except as above -mentioned, and we do hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, We hereunto set our hands and seals this day of , 1985. In Presence Of: John H. Belter, Jr. Joyce N. Belter STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County, this day of 1985, personally appeared JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER, and they acknowledged this instrument, by them signed, to be their free act and deed. Before me, [PS13L] Notary Public __1 A731530 r— — PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES No. A 7 3 1 5 3 0 MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05602 A. SELLER (TRANSFEROR) NAMFIS) MAILING ADDRESS 1% r_LL INCLUDING 71P CODE SC" %t SCURiTY Nlj"BLR John H. Belter, Jr. 102 Ethan Allen Drive 048-38-5113 Joyce N. Belter South Burlington, VT 05401 BUYER (TRANSFEREE) NAMEISI MAILING ADDRESS IN FULL INCLUDING ZIP CODE SOCIAL SECUP.ITY NUMBER city of SouthBurlington Souti>-Bur�iilgtalr; �`F-0540 • ' LOCATION (Such as "173 Maple St., Burlington" OR "The Smith Farm, Old Mill Hoar, T-1),id,le' If property is located in two towns, please list both. Ethan Allan Drive South Burlington, VT 05401 I1 the buyers acquired less than the entire interest (Fee Simple) in the property, please state the interest acquired (such as "Life Estate," "Perpetual Easement, etc,) APPROXIMATE LAND SIZE: I ACREAGE: AND LOT SIZE: FRONTAGE: DEPTH: Please check the applicable boxles) describing existing buildings. 1 u NONE 3 R HOUSE 5 ❑ BARN 7 ❑ M11061 LE HOME 9 0 STORE 2❑ FACTORY 4[:] CAMP .,VACATION HOME 6APARTMENT, NO. UNITS 8E] CONDOMINIUM, NO. UNITS 10[] OTHER (EXPLAIN) womPlease check the category which best describes the use of the property BEFORE TRANSFER as shown in the GRAND.LIST BOOK. 1 R PRIMARY RESIDENCE 2R TIMBERLAND 4[_] GOVERNMENT USE 6❑ OPEN LAND 8 ® OTHER (EXPLAI'publlc (excluding mobile homes) NEWLY CONSTRUCTED 3❑ OPERATING FARM 5 COMMERCIAL 7❑ INDUSTRIAL 9El CAMP OR VACATION adway (never occupied, less than 1 yr. old) EXISTING Please check the category which best describes the proposed use of the property AFTER TRANSFER. In PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3 ❑ OPERATING FARM 5 ❑ COMMERCIAL 71:1 INDUSTRIAL 9 CAMP OR VACATION 2❑TIMBERLAND 4 GOVERNMENT USE 6 ❑OPEN LAND 8 ® OTHER (EXPLAIN) public roa way 99alummTHIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED IF TRANSFER IS CLAIMED TO BE EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX. If such an exemption is claimed, you need not complete the section titled "TAX;' but you MUST COMPLETE the section titled "VALUE." - Transfer without actual consideration. CITE EXEMPTION and EXPLAIN: REAL PROPERTY VALUE INCLUDES the value of any notes, property, stocks, bonds, etc, given to seller, and the value of any mortgages or liens assumed by the buyer. If the transfer was a gift or was for nominal consideration, give the estimated fair market value of the real property transferred. TOTAL PRICE PAID S LESS PERSONAL PROPERTY S REAL PROPERTY VALUE S TAX PAYMENT DUE: FIVE TENTHS OF ONE PERCENT (0.0051 OF THE AMOUNT SHOWN ABOVE, BUT NOT LESS THAN S1.00 (FOR EXAMPLE IF THE VALUE WAS $10,000 THE TAX DUE IS $50.00; IF THE VALUE WAS $100., THE TAX DUE IS $1.00). AMOUNT DUE: )b. None Make checks payable to: VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES. If there were circumstances in the Transfer which suggest that the price paid for the property was either more or less than its fair market value, please explain: • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED: May 8, 1979 IF BY GIFT, DATE DONOR ORIGINALLY ACQUIRED. IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS BEING FILED, CHECK HERE: ❑ IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, INDICATE REASON BELOW (MUST BE ONE OF REASONS GIVEN IN INSTRUCTIONS.) Real Estate Broker's name (if any): If purchaser's principal residence exemption is claimed and purchaser fails to comply with exemption requirements, purchaser will be liable for full amount of Land Gains Tax. NOTE: Residents, Part -Year Residents, Non -Residents - If you realized a gain on the sale of your property that was included in your Federal Adjusted Gross Income, A Vermont Income Tax Return must be filed. CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 32 V.S.A. § 9606 (c) FOR SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (18 V.S.A. 1� 1218 et seq.) This transfer is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations of the Agency of Environmental Conservation and any permits issued thereunder. If this property has ever received a permit, specify the permit # . Permits must be obtained PRIOR TO TRANSFER. If exempt, specify which numbered item from the instructions applies or, on a separate sheet, explain other circumstances for exemption # . CERTI FICATE — Pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 9606 (e) we hereby swear and affirm that we have investigated and have disclosed to each party involved in this transfer all of our knowledge regarding FLOOD REGULATIONS, if any, which affect the site hereinbefore described. We hereby swear and affirm that this return and above certificates are true, correct and complete to the best of our knowledge as required by 32 V.S.A. a 9606 (b), (c) and (e). Willful falsification of any statement contained herein may result in a fine of not more than S1000. SELLER(S) SIGNATURES) DATE BOYER(S) SIG'.ATI IRE(S) City of South Burlington DATE John H. Belter, Jr: By, Its Duly Authorized Agent Joyce N_._Belter CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO32V.S.A.§§'9608FOR VERMONT'sLAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT LAW- ACT 250-(10V.S.A.;6001etseq.) This conveyance of real property and any development thereon is in compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250), Vermont's Land Use and Development Law and any permits issued thereunder. If this property has ever received an Act 250 permit, please specify the permit # If exempt, specify which numbered item from the instructions applies or, on a separate sheet, explain other circumstances. /We [the Seller(s)] hereby swear and affirm that this certificate is true and complete to the best of my/our knowledge as required by 32 V.S.A. § 9608. Knowing falsification of any statement contained herein is punishable by a fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment for not more than one year. SELLEMSI SIGNATURE(S) DATE SELLERIS) SIGNATURE(S) DATE John H. Belter, r. F Joyce N. Belter PREPARER'S SIGNATURE / V, PREPARED BY Stephen R. Crampton, Esq. PREPARER'S ADDRESS gavel and Sh (1 (PRINT OR TYPE) Burlington, VT 05402 • • • 7 • OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TOWN NUMBER TOWN/CITY RETURN RECEIVED TAX PAID, BOARD OF HEALTH CERTIFICATE RECEIVED. VERMONT LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACT DATE OF RECORD CERTIFICATE RECEIVED. n BOOK NUMBER _.___ PAGE NO, RETURN NO. H EASEMENT AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER, both of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, in consideration of One Dollar and other good and valuable con- sideration paid to their full satisfaction, do hereby GIVE, GRANT, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Vermont, a fifteen foot (15') wide easement and right-of-way in perpetuity for the purposes of installing, repairing, maintaining, restoring and/or replacing stormwater drainage improvements, the location of said easement being adjacent to and easterly of the easterly sideline of Lot 13 as depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision Lots 9-21", dated August, 1985 and recorded in Plat Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, together with drainage or flowage rights for said stormwater as it follows a current drainage course through Grantors' property. The above described easement and right-of-way is given over a portion of the property conveyed to the within Grantors by Warranty Deed of Rene J. and June A. Berard dated May 8, 1979 and recorded in Volume 148 at Pages 225-228 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington. Grantors, their heirs, successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the land subject to this right-of-way and ease- ment such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said easement and right-of-way, and specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement and right-of-way which would pre- vent or interfere with Grantee's ability to repair, replace and/or maintain said stormwater drainage easement. The City of South Burlington agrees that any structures, improvements and/or landscaping affected by said City's maintenance of the stormwater drainage easement shall be returned to the same condition that they were in prior to any change by the City and within a reasonable time after said maintenance. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto the said CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns, forever, and the within Grantors do covenant that they are the sole owners of the premises and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, free and clear of every encumbrance, and Grantors herein engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. The Bank of Vermont, Farmers Home Administration, Rene J. and June A. Berard execute this deed only for the purposes of subordinating their respective mortgage liens to the easement rights being conveyed herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereunto set their hands this day of , 1985. In Presence Of: John H. Belter, Jr. Joyce N. Belter STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of , 1985, personally appeared JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER, and they acknowledged this instrument, by they signed, to be their free act and deed. Before me, In Presence Of: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Notary Public BANK OF VERMONT By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At Burlington, in said County, this day of , 1985, personally appeared , duly authorized agent of the BANK OF VERMONT, and he/she acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the BANK OF VERMONT. Before me, Notary Public In Presence Of: FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION By: Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of , 1985, personally appeared , duly authorized agent of the FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, and he/she acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION. Before me. In Presence Of: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Notary Public Rene J. Berard June A. Berard At , in said County, this day of , 1985, personally appeared RENE J. BERARD and JUNE A. BERARD, and they acknow- ledged this instrument, by they signed, to be their free act and deed. Before me. [PS13L] Notary Public Q73_1529 DATE I/We [the Seller(s)] hereby swear and affirm that this certificate is true and complete to the best of my/our knowledge as required by 32 V.S.A. § 9608. Knowing falsification of any statement contained herein is punishable by a fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment for not more than one year. SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) SELLERIS) SIGNATURES) DATE Joyce N. Belter PREPARER'S SIGNATURE PREPARER'S ADDRESS Gravel and Shea, P. BOX 1049 F� PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES w NO. A 7 .} 1 5 2 9 MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05602 A. SE LER (TRANSFEROR) NAME(S) MAI IN ADDR SS I,l FULL . INCLUDING ZIP CODE S C3 S C RI Y U BEH . OHN H. BELTER, JR. 102 Ethan �il�len rive ��+--�1� JOYCE N. BELTER South Burlington, VT 05401 BUYER (TRANSFEREE) NAME(S) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON MAILING ADDRESS IN FULL INCLUDING ZIP CODE 575 Dorset Street SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER South Burlington, VT 05401 411_2; • ' LOCATION (Such as" 173 Maple St., Burlington" OR "The Smith Farm, Old Mill Road, Tunbridge'). If roperty is located in two towns, please list both. Ethan Allen Drive,. South Burlington, VT 0540C If h b t e uyers acquired less than the entire interest (Fee Simplel in the property, please state the interest acquired (such as "Life Estate," "Perpetual Easement, etc.) APPROXIMATE LAND SIZE: ACREAGE: AND LOT SIZE: FRONTAGE: DEPTH: - Please check the applicable box(es) describing existing buildings. 1 ® NONE 3[-] HOUSE 5❑ BARN 7❑ MOBILE HOME 9❑ STORE 2 FACTORY 4❑ CAMP or VACATION HOME 6E] APARTMENT, NO. UNITS 8 ❑ CONDOMINIUM, NO. UNITS 10 Q OTHER (EXPLAIN) -1 Please check the category which best describes the use of the property BEFORE TRANSFER as shown in the GRAND LIST BOOK." s 1 ❑PRIMARY RESIDENCE 2❑ TIMBERLAND 4GOVERNMENT USE 6❑ OPEN LAND 8 ® OTHER (EXPLAIN) storm (excluding mobile homes) ❑ ❑ ❑ drainage purpos ❑ ES NEWLY CONSTRUCTED 3 OPERATING FARM 5 COMMERCIAL 7 INDUSTRIAL 9 CAMP OR VACATION (never occupied, less than 1 yr. old) IDEXISTING Please check the category which best describes the proposed use of the property AFTER TRANSFER, in PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3 OPERATING FARM 5 ❑ COMMERCIAL 7 ❑ INDUSTRIAL g CAMP OR VACATION 2n TIMBERLAND 4 ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 6 ❑ OPEN LAND 810 OTHER (EXPLAIN) storm drainage purposes Emm • THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED IF TRANSFER IS CLAIMED TO BE EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX. If such an exemption is claimed, you need not complete the section titled "TAX;' but you MUST COMPLETE the section titled "VALUE." CITE EXEMPTION and EXPLAIN: — Transfer without actual consideration. REAL PROPERTY VALUE INCLUDES the value of any notes, property, stocks, bonds, etc, given to seller, and the value of any mortgages or liens assumed by the buyer. If the transfer was a gift or was for nominal consideration, give the estimated fair market value of the real property transferred. TOTAL PRICE PAID S LESS PERSONAL PROPERTY S REAL PROPERTY VALUE S TAX PAYMENT DUE: FIVE TENTHS OF ONE PERCENT (0.005) OF THE AMOUNT SHOWN ABOVE, BUT NOT LESS THAN $1.00 (FOR EXAMPLE IF THE VALUE WAS $10,000 THE TAX DUE IS $50.00; IF THE VALUE WAS $100., THE TAX DUE IS $1.00). AMOUNT DUE: >. None Make checks payable to: VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES. If there were circumstances in the Transfer which suggest that the price paid for the property was either more or less than its fair market value, please explain: • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED: May H, 1979 IF BY GIFT, DATE DONOR ORIGINALLY ACQUIRED: IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS BEING FILED, CHECK HERE: ❑ IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, INDICATE REASON BELOW: (MUST BE ONE OF REASONS GIVEN IN INSTRUCTIONS.) Property held over six years; transfer without consideration Real Estate Broker's name lif any): If purchasers principal residence exemption is claimed and purchaser fails to comply with exemption requirements, purchaser will be liable for full amount of Land Gains Tax. NOTE: Residents, Part -Year Residents, Non -Residents - If you realized a gain on the sale of your property that was included in your Federal Adjusted Gross Income, A Vermont Income Tax Return must be filed. CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 32 V.S.A. § 9606 (c) FOR SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (18 V.S.A. § 1218 et seq.) This transfer is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations of the Agency of Environmental Conservation and any permits issued thereunder. If this property has ever received a permit, specify the permit# . Permits must be obtained PRIOR TO TRANSFER. If exempt, specify which numbered item from the instructions applies or, on a separate sheet, explain other circumstances for exemption # . CERTIFICATE — Pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 9606 (a) we hereby swear and affirm that we have investigated and have disclosed to each party involved in this transfer all of our knowledge regarding FLOOD REGULATIONS, if any, which affect the site hereinbefore described. We hereby swear and affirm that this return and above certificates are true, correct and complete to the best of our knowledge as required by 32 V.S.A. § 9606 (b), (c) and (e). Willful falsification of any statement contained herein may result in a fine of not more than $1000. SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE John H. Belter, Jr: joyee N. BI.ItYsE IS1 SOkATgOEiLh Burlington DATE Ryo Its Duly Authorized Agent CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 32 V.S.A. § 9608 FOR VERMONT's LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT LAW- ACT 250 - (10 V.S.A. § 6001 etseq.) This conveyance of real property and any development thereon is in compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250), Vermont's Land Use and Development Law and any permits issued thereunder. If this property has ever received an Act 250 permit, please specify the permit # the instructions applies or, on a separate sheet, explain other circumstances. If exempt, specify which numbered item from PREPARED BY qf'PTl}1PnR C'.r2mT)i-c1i1 Esq. (PRINT OR TYPE) Burlington, VT 05402 TOWN/CITY DATE OF RECORD RETURN RECEIVED TAX PAID, BOARD OF HEALTH CERTIFICATE RECEIVED. VERMONT LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACT CERTIFICATE RECEIVED. RETURN NO. TOWN NUMBER FORM 912 VERMONT . QUJ -'%,AIM DEED TUTBLANX a.T 011 Tutt/E Law Pr�n t, Fub/iSh erS, NCl/dnp, L/1 of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden r111d ,'tate of Vermont Grantors , in the consideration - of -------------------------------Ten and More------------------------------- Dollars p(lid to our j`ull satisfaction- by CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation 4�' ita the Cortit,ty of Chittenden and .Stage of Vermont Grantee , have REMISED, RELEASED, AND FOREVER QUITCLAIMED unto the said CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON all right and title which JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER certain, piece of land in C01,172ty of Chittenden follows, 14Z: or their heirs haze in, and to a South Burlington in the and State of Verm,otzt, described as Being all our right, title and interest in and to a parcel of land, said to contain one-third of an acre, more or less, which lies westerly or southwesterly of Shamrock Road and easterly or southeasterly of Airport Parkway, said parcel being triangular in shape and formed by the intersection of Airport Parkway and Shamrock Road. Said property is conveyed subject to any and all easements, rights of way, conditions or other matters of record in the South Burlington City Land Records. The rights, title and interest to the above -described property would be any right, title and interest which Grantors received pursuant to the Warranty Deed of Rene J. and June A. Berard dated May 8, 1979 and recorded in Volume 148 at Pages 225-228 of the South Burlington City Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. [PS13L] kand assigns, that from and after the ensealing of these presents the said JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER kill have and claim no right, in, or to the said quit -claimed premises. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we hereunto set our hand sand seal this day of Jn tonVrw of _ s JOHN H. BELTER, JR. FAA All JOYCE N. BELTER STATE OF VERMONT, 1 it this CHITTENDEN County J SS' day of .4. D. 19 85 JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER personally appeared, and they acknowledged this instrument, by them sealed and subscribed, to be their free act and deed. Before me w U Cr.) LL. 0 O Notary Public (Title) IT Y z W U — w > O O O w w W J U W O Q LL W '0 0-- 0 Cr w W �- O Y w 0 OU o O I- n Q Q no Q fl� A731528 PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES NO. A 7 3 1 5 2 8 MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05602 A. SELLER (TRANSFEROR) NAME(S) MAILING ADDRESS IN FULL - INCLUDING ZIP CODE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBE H John H.Belter, Jr. 102 Ethan Allen Drive Joyce N. Belter South Burlington, VT 05401 BUYER (TRANSFEREE:I NAME(SI MAILING ADDRESS IN FULL - INCLUDING ZIP CODE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER ITY OF SOUTH B RL N 0 --t Street u limgun,_ VT 05401 • ' LOCATION (Such as'•173 Maple St.. Burlington" OR "The Smith Farm, Old %1,II Road, Tunbndce' I. If property is located in two towns, please list both. Ethan Allen Drive, If the buyers acquired less than the entire interest (Fee Simple) in the property, please state the interest acquired (such as "Life Estate, "Perpetual Easement, etc.) APPROXIMATE LAND SIZE: I ACREAGE: AND LOT SIZE: FRONTAGE. DEPTH Please check the applicable boxles) describing existing buildings. 1 ETNONE 3❑ HOUSE 5❑ BARN 7 ❑ MOBILE HOME 9 ❑ STORE 2 ❑ FACTORY 4❑ CAMP or VACATION HOME 60 APARTMENT, NO. UNITS 8[] CONDOMINIUM, NO. UNITS 100 OTHER (EXPLAIN) Please check the category which best describes the use of the property BEFORE TRANSFER as shown in the GRAND LIST BOOK. 1 ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 2❑ TIMBERLAND 4❑ GOVERNMENT USE 6EROPEN LAND 8 OTHER (EXPLAIN) (excluding mobile homes) NEWLY CONSTRUCTED 3❑ OPERATING FARM 5 ❑ COMMERCIAL 7INDUSTRIAL 9 CAMP OR VACATION (never occupied, less than 1 yr. old) EXISTING Please check the category which best describes the proposed use of the property AFTER TRANSFER. in PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3 OPERATING FARM 5 11 COMMERCIAL 7 INDUSTRIAL 9 CAMP OR VACATION 20TIMBERLAND 4❑GOVERNMENT USE 6JEJOPEN LAND 800THER(EXPLAIN) • • THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED IF TRANSFER IS CLAIMED TO BE EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX. If such an exemption is claimed, you need not complete the section titled "TAX;' but you MUST COMPLETE the section titled "VALUE." CITE EXEMPTION and EXPLAIN: Transfer Without actual consideration. REAL PROPERTY VALUE INCLUDES the value of any notes, property, stocks, bonds, etc, given to seller, and the value of any mortgages or liens assumed by the buyer. If the transfer was a gift or was for nominal consideration, give the estimated fair market value of the real property transferred. TOTAL PRICE IDS LESS PERSONAL PROPERTY S REAL PROPERTY VALUE S TAX PAYMENT DUE: FIVE TENTHS OF ONE PERCENT (0.005) OF THE AMOUNT SHOWN ABOVE, BUT NOT LESS THAN S1.00 (FOR EXAMPLE IF THE VALUE WAS $10 000 THE TAX DUE IS $50.00: IF THE VALUE WAS $100., THE TAX DUE IS $1,00). AMOUNT DUE: )Nmi- None Make checks payable to: VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES. If there were circumstances in the Transfer which suggest that the price paid for the property was either more or less than its fair market value, please explain: ,,f • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED: May H, 1979 IF BY GIFT, DATE DONOR ORIGINALLY ACQUIRED:' IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS BEING FILED, CHECK HERE: ❑ IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, INDICATE REASON BELOW. (MUST BE ONE OF REASONS GIVEN IN INSTRUCTIONS.) Property held over sixyears; transfer without actual consideration. Real Estate Broker's name (if any): If purchaser's principal residence exemption is claimed and purchaser faits to comply with exemption requirements, purchaser will be liable for full amount of Land Gains Tax. NOTE: Residents, Part -Year Residents, Non -Residents - If you realized a gain on the sale of your property that was included in your Federal Adjusted Gross Income, A Vermont Income Tax Return must be filed. CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 32 V.S.A. § 9606 (c) FOR SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (18 V.S.A. § 1218 et seq.) This transfer is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations of the Agency of Environmental Conservation and any permits issued thereunder. If this property has ever received a permit, specify the permit # . Permits must be obtained PRIOR TO TRANSFER. If exempt, specify which numbered item from the instructions applies or, on a separate sheet, explain other circumstances for exemption # . CERTIFICATE — Pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 9606 (e) we hereby swear and affirm that we have investigated and have disclosed to each party involved in this transfer all of our knowledge regarding FLOOD REGULATIONS, if any, which affect the site hereinbefore described. We hereby swear and affirm that this return and above certificates are true, correct and complete to the best of our knowledge as required by 32 V.S.A. § 9606 (b), (c) and (e). Willful falsification of any statement contained herein may result in a fine of not more than $1000. SELLEP,IS) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYFR(S) SIGNATURES) City of South Burlington DATE John H. Belter, Jr. By; Its Duly Authorized Agent Joyce N. Belter CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO32 V.S.A. §9608 FOR VERMONT'SLAND USSAND DFVELOPMENTLAW- ACT 250-(10V.S.A. §6001etseq.) This conveyance of real property and any development thereon is in compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250), Vermont's` Land Use and Development Law and any permits issued thereunder. If this property has ever received an Act 250 permit, please specify the permit # If exempt, specify which numbered item from the instructions applies or, on a separate sheet, explain other circumstances. I/We (the Seller(s)) hereby swear and affirm that this certificate is true and complete to the best of my/our knowledge as required by 32 V.S.A. § 9608. Knowing falsification of any statement contained herein is punishable by a fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment for not more than one year. SELLER(S) SIGNATUHE(S) I DATE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE John ti. Se-lter, Jr. Joyce N. Belter PREPARER'S SIGNATURE PREPARED BY Stephen R. Crampton, -Esq. Gravel and Shea, . 0. Box 1049 (PRINT OR TYPE) Burlington, VT 05402 PR EPARER'S ADDRESS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TOWN NUMBER TOWNICITY RETURN RECEIVED TAX PAID, BOARD OF HEALTH CERTIFICATE DATE OF RECORD RECEIVED. VERMONT LAND USE AND q DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACT CERTIFICATE RECEIVED. A 7 3 1- 5 2 V BOOK NUMBER _- _ PAGE NO. RETURN NO. CHARLES T. SHEA STEPHEN R. CRAMPTON STEWART H. MCCONAUGHY ROBERT B. HEMLEY WILLIAM G. POST, JR CRAIG WEATHERLY JOHN R. PONSETTO NORMAN WILLIAMS JAMES E. KNAPP DENNIS R. PEARSON D. RUSSELL MORGAN GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTO RN EYS AT LAW 109 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 1049 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 October 22, 1985 Mrs. Jane B. Lafleur City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Jane: TELEPHONE 6S8-0220 AREA CODE 802 CLARKE A. GRAVEL COUNSEL I have forwarded the original documents to John Belter for his execution and assume he will be bringing them to you directly. I enclose a copy of the revised warranty deed for the road widening which in Parcel Four now extends the 5.25 foot strip from Shamrock Road all the way to the Berard property. I assume this satisfies your request. Cordially, GRAVEL and SHEA S phen R. Crampton SRC:wsb Enclosure CC: John H. Belter, Jr. GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTO:R N EYS AT LAW CHARLEN T. SHEA STE R. CRAMPTON 109 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE TELEPHONE 658-0220 STEWART ROBER T B. EMLEY UGHY ROBERT B. HEMLEY POST OFFICE BOX 1049 AREA CODE 802 WILLIAM G. POST, JR. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 CLARIIE A. GRAVEL CRAIG WEATHERLY COUNSEL JOHN R. PONSETTO NORMAN WILLIAMS JAMES E. KNAPP DENNIS R. PEARSON D. RUSSELL MORGAN October 22, 1985 Mr. John H. Belter, Jr. 102 Ethan Allen Drive cSouth Burlington, VT 05401 Dear John: OI enclose the final documentation for you and your wife to execute and bring to Jane Lafleur. I will assume you will take care of that yourself unless I hear otherwise. Cordially, PCRAVEL and SHEA yStephen R. Crampton SRC:wsb Enclosures CC: Jane B. Lafleur Exhibit A 0 WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that, JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER of South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantors, in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantee, by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Parcel One: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and northerly of the existing sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends from the southwesterly corner of Lot 9 to the southeasterly corner of Lot 13. Said strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Parcel Two: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and southerly of the existing sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends from the northwesterly corner of Lot 14 to the northeasterly corner of Lot 18. Said strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Parcel Three: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and southwesterly and southerly of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends from an iron pin marking the intersection of the southwesterly sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way with the easterly sideline of the Shamrock Road right-of-way in a southeasterly and thence easterly direction along the existing southerly sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way to an existing monument marking the northwesterly corner of property now or formerly of Berard. Said strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Parcel Four: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and northeasterly of the existing sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends from an iron pin marking the intersection of the northeasterly sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way with the easterly sideline of the Shamrock Road right-of-way in a southeasterly and thence easterly direction along the existing northerly sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way to an existing monument marking the southwesterly corner of property now or formerly of Berard. Said. strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Included with this conveyance are all improvements located within, over, or under said roadway strip including, but not by way of limita- tion, paving, curbing, base preparations, hydrants, and all utility mains and appurtenances thereto. The small strips of property conveyed herein are a small portion of the property conveyed to the within Grantors by Warranty Deed of Rene J. and June A. Berard dated May 8, 1979 and recorded in Volume 148 at Pages 225-228 of the South Burlington City Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation, its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; And the said Grantors, JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER, for ourselves and our heirs, executors and administrators, do covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, we are the sole owners of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; except as above -mentioned, and we do hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, We hereunto set our hands and seals this day of , 1985. In Presence Of: John H. Belter, Jr. Joyce N. Belter STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County, this day of _ _, 1985, personally appeared JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and J_OYCE N. BELTER, and they acknowledged this instrument, by them signed, to be their free act and deed. Before me, [PS13L] Notary Public YOr 4�1� WARRANTY DEED �b k& KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that, JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER of South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantors, in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantee, by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Parcel One: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and northerly of the existing sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same ,w- extends from the southwesterly corner of Lot 9 to the southeasterly corner of Lot 13. Said strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Parcel Two: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and southerly of the existing sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends from the northwesterly corner of Lot 14 to the northeasterly corner of Lot 18. Said strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm 'Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Parcel Three: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and southwesterly and southerly of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends from an iron pin marking the intersection of the southwesterly sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way with the easterly sideline of the Shamrock Road right-of-way in a southeasterly and thence easterly direction along the existing southerly sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way to an existing monument marking the northwesterly corner of property now or formerly of Berard. Said strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Parcel Four: Being a strip of land five and twenty-five hundredths feet (5.25') in uniform width, to be used for public roadway purposes, said 5.25 foot strip being the 5.25 feet adjacent to and northeasterly of the existing sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way as same extends from an iron pin marking the intersection of the northeasterly sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way with the easterly sideline of the Shamrock Road right-of-way in a southeasterly and thence easterly direction along the existing northerly sideline of the Ethan Allen Drive right-of-way to an existing monument marking the southwesterly corner of property now or formerly of Berard. Said strip is depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision: Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Included with this conveyance are all improvements located within, over, or under said roadway strip including, but not by way of limita- tion, paving, curbing, base preparations, hydrants, and all utility mains and appurtenances thereto. The small strips of property conveyed herein are a small portion of the property conveyed to the within Grantors by Warranty Deed of Rene J. and June A. Berard dated May 8, 1979 and recorded in Volume 148 at Pages 225-228 of the South Burlington City Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation, its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; And the said Grantors, JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER, for ourselves and our heirs, executors and administrators, do covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, we are the sole owners of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; except as above -mentioned, and we do hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, We hereunto set our hands and seals this day of October, 1985. In Presence Of: STATE OF VERMONT CRITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Qljt., " 9. && I Joh H. Belteer��, Jr. Jo e A. Belter At South Burlington, in said County, thisC2� day of October, 1985, personally appeared JOHN H. BELTER, JR. and JOYCE N. BELTER, and they acknowledged this instrument, by them signed, to be their free act and deed. Before _ IISYI LaiY�'� Notary Public [PS13L] Ethan Allen Farm industrial Subdivision Lots 9-21 John H. Helter, Jr. Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, Vt. u54u1 May 13, 1985 On May 2 and 3, 1985 sail excavation anal y�si s was performed on Lots 9-21 for the Ethan Allen farm industrial Subdivision, with percolation testing performed on May 11 and 12, 118"j. Iwo test pit surveys and two percolation tests were performed per lot. Each test pit was approximately 7 feet deep. the percolation tests were at a depth of about 36 inches. Notes: April's monthly rainfall was below the typical monthly average. Lots 14-18 are it-) a much cultivated corn field. Streaking was evident in pi.ts on lots ;-18 in varying degrees. Fertilizer/manure and some roots were evident to a depth of nearly 4' on lots 14--18. A water table test pit was excavated between pits 11-ja and 14a. Ground water-- was evident at a depth of about 11 feet. The fol 1 owi ng are the results of the soi 1 excavat ion and percolation tests: Test ["it Analysis Per col at i on Rate LO1 9 09 r:!- 1u" top soi I 10"-84" f i ne brown sand B. 9 nti n i i n #9a 0-12" topsoil 12 "-84" fine brown sand Ei mi rri if) L O I It.) 131i� 0-10" topsoil fine brown sand 2. i min/ 1 n #ll!a u1 12" topsoi 1 12"- 84 " f i na brown sand 1 LOT 1] #11 CI-1r:I" topsoi 1 100•--84" f i ne brown sand 5.6 min / i n #11a 0-12" topsoil 1:"'--84" fine brown sand �.:� min / i n LUT 1-2 #12 ri-6" topsoil 6"-84" fine brown sand 4.4 min/in #12a a-12" topsoil 12"-84" fine brown sand LOT 1.3 #r_1-12" top -;oil 12"-48" fine brown sand 2 min/in 48" --66" Silty sand 66"-84" fine brown sanct #13a r:r 12 topsoi 1 12" 04" fine brown sand _. 4 min / i ii LOT 14 #14 0-12" topsoil (cultivated) 12"-54" fine brown sand with silt 4 miniir, 54"-84" fine brown sand #14a O-B" topsoil (cultivated) 13"-42" fine brown sand wi ttr si 1 t 42"-84" fine brown sand LOT 15 #15 0-8" topsoil (cultivated) 8"-18" sandy loam 18 -04" fine brown sand with si 1 t #lea topsoi 1 (cul tl vated) 8"-24" sandy loam 24"-44" fine brown sand witlr silt `5 min/iri 44"-f:34" fine brown sand 1-01 16 #16 a-6" topsoil (cultivated) 8"-24" sandy loam 24"-66" fine brown sand with silt 66"-84" fine brown sand #16a O-8" topsoil (cultivated) 8"--24" sandy loam 24"-4e" fine brown sand wi tF, si 1 t 48"-56" fried um --coarse sand 56"-B4 " fine brown sand LO r 17 #17 0-8" topsoil W`44" fine brown sand with silt 44"-92" silt with fine brown sand #17a 0-8" topsoil (cultivated) 8"-36" fine brown sand 36"-42" medium coarse sand 42"-72" silt with fine brown sand 72"-102" medium coarse brown sand LOT 18 418 topsoil (cultivated) 8"-42" fine brown sandy -loam witty silt traces 42"-1-jU" medium coarse sand 5C )"-84" fine brown sand #18a 0-18" topsoil 18"-66" fine brown sand with silt traces 66"-102" silt with fine brown sand LOT 19 #19 mottling C 12" 0-lV" topsoil sandy -silty loam `18"-cf4" fine brown sand with si i t #1.9a mottling L 12,, 0-12" topsoil 1 "--6(-)" sandy--si 1 ty loam 60"--84" fine brown sand with silt Soil saturated at 6 ' ; no st:-,ndi ng water to 7'. z J 1.'`.- rnin/irr �.E, min/ln I. 1 min/in 3.8 min/in 6. 7 rain/in "�.9 min/1n B.9 min/in `�. mini irr LOT 20 #20 mottling ® 12" 0-12" topsoil 12"-60" sandy -silty loam 60"-84" fine brown sand with silt #20a mottling @ 12" 0-12" topsoil 12"-60" sandy -silty loam 60"-84" fine brown sand with silt LOT 21 #21 mottling @ 12" 0-12" topsoil 12"-24" sandy -silty loam 24"-84" fine brown sand with silt #21a mottling @ 12" 0-12" topsoil 12"-84" fine brown sand with silt � Chri sto er D. Bishop, P.E. Vermont Registration Number: 4435 16 min/in 8.9 min/in 8 min/in 20 min/in 4 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant -p� J. N . & ,{ ;rk . 2) Name of Subdivision F- Ah A( es,, i;�s(u,4r,,ti 3) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application: ►7 ° h am 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: 5) Submit four copies of a final set of plans consisting of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit tfo draft copies of all legal documents required under section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. Jignature) applicant or contact person Vai� Date CITY OF SOUPH BURLI%-70N Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant- John h. Belter, Jr. 2) Name of Subdivision Ethan Allen Farm, Industrial Subdivision, Lots 9-21 3) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application: -,n i i Christopher D. Bishop, P.E. 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: Addition of storm drainage easement east of Lot13. 5) Submit four copies of a final set of plans consisting of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit too draft copies of all legal documents required under section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. (Signature) applicant o contact person ' Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLiNGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINAi3Y PLAT 1) Name of Applicant John H. Belter, Jr. 2) Name of Subdivisior, Ethan Allen Farm, Industrial Subdivision, Lots 9-21 3) Describe Subdivision (i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of lard use, include gross floor area if comm- ercial.) 1i - lot industrial sub iyisiQwj previously ajprn`rpcj .--i ffi i vi ci pn 4) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record,applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: None 5. Nam-, address, and phone number of: a. Enqineer b . Surveyor Warren A. Robenstien. 4 Farm Roac1,--CQI-oh-,stem_ Vt _ _.D5446 c. Attorney P1nt D6si^ner David H. Spitz_,_ North Country_pl, ping, _P,Q_ Box ._333, Winooski, Vt. 05404 1 6) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., sins this proposal was last before the Commission: Revised location of private road easement. as_per _ sketch plan request 7) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all cont- igous properties: _. See attachment 8) State title, drawing numb r, date of origi�,,l plus any revisions, -and designer(s) of the preliminary mar)(s) accompanying this appli- cation: �) attach a preliminary map showing the followina information: 1) Proposed subdivision name or iden-ifyinc title and the name of the city. 2) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. 3) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical -Features. 4) The names of all subdivisions immediately adjacent nnc the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. 5) The location and size of any existing sewers and grater mains, culverts and r,�ins on the property or serving the property to be subdivided. o) Location, names and widths of existing, and proposes streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks and other public or privately maintained opNn snares as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. 7) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of proposed finished grades where change of existing ground elevation will be five feet or more. 8) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. 9) Numerical 5nd graphic scalc!, crate and true north arrow. 10) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative means of providing water supply to the proposed subdivision. 11) Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provision for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 12) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed-, location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface'Vioil, rock and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results of percolation tests. 13) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. 14) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culverts which may be recruired . 15) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic lay- out in the field. Unless an existing street intersection is shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. 16) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 10) Developmental timetable (including number of phases, and start and compl -tion dates) Begin Fall 1985.anticipated completion, 1986 or 1987 11) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: 12) Attach a vicinity map showing the follo-aing: _ 1) All existing subdivisions, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the record owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street ad- joining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing filed or proposed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the sub - divider's entire holding. (signature) anplic contact person crate ETHAN ALLEN FARM ABUTTERS 1. Ray Unsworth, 1700 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 2. Rene J. & June A. Berard, 101 Ethan Allen Drive; South Burlington, Vt. 05401 3. S.T. Griswold, Williston, Vermont 05495 4. Martin C. & Ruth B. Schmidt, 8 Country Club Drive, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 5. Frank W. & Martha K. Lidral, 10 6. Richard J. & Lynne -Dell Dore, 12 -- 7. Donald R. & Carolyn S. McKenzie, 14 ++ " 8. Marc A. & Margaret E. Roy, 16 9. Norman D. Brochu, 18 10. Robert G. & Yolande J. Turmel, 24 11. Stephen A. & Lisa G. Phelps, 26 12. George D. & Helena M. Brooks, 30 13. Susan T. Weed, 34 " " 14. Charles M. & Ann M. Daley, 38 15. James A. & Jane E. Harrocks, 42 16. David B. & Patricia M. Myette, 46 " n 17. Willard-B. & Elaine M. Knight, 41 Mt. View Blvd., South Burlington, Vt. 05)101 18. Roger 0. & Lessie A. Campbell, 37 if if if 19. Sally C. Guerette & Ruth C. Paul, 33 if 20. Gladys L. Heath, 29 It ++ " 2i. Wilhelm H. & Suzanne F. Kalweit, 25 22. Kevin L. & Marianne B. Harding, 91 Country Club Drive East, South Burl,Vt. 05401 23. Clayton E. & Dorothy C. Swartwood, 92 It ++ " 24. John W. & Carol A. Rowe,, 96 if 25. Anton R. & Margaret A. Jaremczuk, 11 North Willard Street, Burlington, Vt. 05401 26. John J. & Janette T. Hamilton, 104 Country Club Drive East, So. Burl, Vt. 05401 27. Russell M. & Susan L. Agne, 110 28. Dennis M. & Linda A. Johnson, 114 29. Royce W. & Anita M. Irwin, 118 30. Edmund G. & Cynthia M. Fischer, 140 31. Tommaso D. & Elizabeth A. Rendino, 148 32. City of Burlington (Burlington International Airport) 33. Frank R. Naef & Randall C. Volk, 4 Park Terrace, Essex Junction, Vt. 05452 34. William E. Shfffler, Jericho, Vt. 05465 35. Randy M. Berard, 80 Ethan Allen Drive, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 36. Arthur F. Shields, Gary H. Mertens & Alfred J. Martell, 1350 Dorset St, So.Burl 05401 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record John H_ Bel tPr, .ir, South Burlingi-nn� Vermont - b. Applicant c. Contact person David 14- Spit7-, Nor- El, 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). Continuation of industrial suhdivieinn nnnsi-sting of 13 new lots in addition to 8 nrevi ousi ll -,„hdivided lets — C1 - 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) Fee simple ownership 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties See attached sheet 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. _ Green Mountain Power and VELCO power line easements �,.r,� t Cow 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. Existing public street (Ethan Allen Drive); private septic systems; CWD water supply. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjusctment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub- division, and include the dates of such actions: Planning Commission of 1st 8 industrial lots, May 1983. 8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) 'Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. (Signature) applicant or person a 7 S date ETHAN ALLEN FARM ABUTTERS 1. Ray Unsworth, 1700 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 2. Rene J. & June A. Berard, 101 Ethan Allen Drive, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 3. S.T. Griswold, Williston, Vermont 05495 4. Martin C. & Ruth B. Schmidt, 8 Country Club Drive, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 5. Frank W. & Martha K. Lidral, 10 p 6. Richard J. & Lynne -Dell Dore, 12 7. Donald R. & Carolyn S. McKenzie, 14 8. Marc A. & Margaret E. Roy, 16 �► „ „ 9. Norman D. Brochu, 18 10. Robert G. & Yolande J. Turmel, 24 11. Stephen A. & Lisa G. Phelps, 26 12. George D. & Helena M. Brooks, 30 13. Susan T. Weed, 34 14. Charles M. & Ann M. Daley, 38 15. James A. & Jane E. Harrocks, 42 16. David B. & Patricia M. Myette, 46 17. Willard B. & Elaine M. Knight, 41 Mt. View Blvd., South Burlington, Vt. 05401 18. Roger 0. & Lessie A. Campbell, 37 if if if 19. Sally C. Guerette & Ruth C. Paul, 33 if It 20. Gladys L. Heath, 29 if if „ 21. Wilhelm H. & Suzanne F. Kalweit, 25 It It „ 22. Kevin L. & Marianne B. Harding, 91 Country Club Drive East, South Burl,Vt. 05401 23. Clayton E. & Dorothy C. Swartwood, 92 Y1 11 24. John W. & Carol A. Rowe, 96 if it „ 25. Anton R. & Margaret A. Jaremczuk, 11 North Willard Street, Burlington, Vt. 05401 26. John J. & Janette T. Hamilton, 104 Country Club Drive East, So. Burl, Vt. 05401 27. Russell M. & Susan L. Agne, 110 11 11 „ 28. Dennis M. & Linda A. Johnson, 114 if ,f n 29. Royce W. & Anita M. Irwin, 118 it if „ 30. Edmund G. & Cynthia M. Fischer, 140 IT 31. Tommaso D. & Elizabeth A. Rendino, 148 �� �► „ 32. City of Burlington (Burlington International Airport) 33. Frank R. Naef & Randall C. Volk, 4 Park Terrace, Essex Junction, Vt. 05452 34. William E. Shiffler, Jericho, Vt. 05465 35. Randy M. Berard, 80 Ethan Allen Drive, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 36. Arthur F. Shields, Gary H. Mertens & Alfred J. Martell, 1350 Dorset St, So.Burl 05401 May 23, 1986 John Belter 102 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Ethan Allen Farm Subdivision Dear John: Enclosed are the minutes of your final approval. Please be sure to meet all of the stipulations within the required time. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp E n (-- 1 PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 May 9, 1986 John Belter Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05401 re: Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision Dear John: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission. I have also enclosed Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments as well as the traffic data from your Act 250 permit. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls cc: David Spitz 5/13/86 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Final Plat application of John Belter for the 13 lot industrial subdivision as depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm, Industrial Subdivision lots 9-21" as prepared by Warren A. Robenstien, dated August, 1985 with the following stipulations: 1. On —site sewage disposal. systems for each lot shall be installed in the front yards so that connection to a future sewer main in Ethan Allen Drive is possible. 2. The 5.25 foot wide dedication for future street widening shall be shown to extend to the southeast corner of lot #8. Revised plans shall be filed with the City Planner within 30 days. 3. The sum of $5000 shall be paid prior to permit for the improvements to Ethan Allen Drive. It may be paid in $1000 installments upon permit for the first five lots in this subdi- vision. 4. It is the applicant's responsibility to record the revised Final Plat with the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval shall be null and void. It must be approved by the Planner and signed by the Chairman or Clerk of the Planning Commission prior to recording. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, May 13, , 1986, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Public hearing: Final Plat application of Gregory and Carole Lothrop for the subdivision of a acre parcel into three single-familv lots measuring approximately 76 feet by 170 feet and balance of the land to be deeded to the City. roper y is located between #99 and #171 Kirby Road and is bounded by Paquette and Shepard to the east, Carrassi, raga, Bevins, _Swan and Murphy to the south, the City of South Burlington, Carney and Kynoch to the west and Kirby Road -to the nor 2) Final Plat application of John Belter for the continuation of the industrial subdivision with 13 new lots, #9 - Ethan Allen Farm. Applicaation was previously approved but expired due to failure to meet state require i ing ea ines. Propertv is bounded on the south by the Airport and National Guard Avenue, on the west by Shamrock Road, on the nortn by Naef. Bouchard and Unsworth, R. Berard, and the numerous residents of Country Club Estates and the Burlington International -rpor Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Peter L. Jacob Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission April 26, 1986 July 2, 1985 Katherine Vose AEC 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Belter - 13 lot Indastrial Subdivision, Ethan Allen Farm Dear Katherine: D� This letter serves to confirm that the South Burlington Planning Commission has approved the 13-lot Industrial Subdivision at Ethan Allen Drive. This is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Sincerely, r V , Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg cc: David Spitz John Belter i June 28, 1985 I John Belter i 102 Ethan Allen Drive Ethan Allen Farm South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 13 lot Industrial Subdivision Dear John: Enclosed are the minutes of the June 25 meeting at which your Final Plat was approved. Please record your plat with the City Clerk within 90 days. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 1 Encl cc: David Spitz 6/24/85 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Final Plat application of John Belter for the 13 lot industrial sub- division as depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm, Industrial Subdivision Lots 9-21" as prepared by Warren A. Robenstien, dated May 1985, with the following stipulations: 1. The drainage easement along the eastern part of the subdivision shall be extended to the drainage dit h. 2. On -site sewage disposal systems for each lot shall be installed in the front yards so that connection to a future sewer main in Ethan Allen Drive is possible. 3. A 5.25 foot strip of land on either side of Ethan Allen Drive shall be dedicated to the City for future street widening. 4. The land at the intersection of Shamrock Road and Airport Parkway shall be dedicated to the City for intersection straightening. 5. The sum of $5000 shall be,paid prior to permit'for the improve- ments to Ethan Allen Drive.' 6. Legal documents for the land dedication, the road widening dedication and the drainage easement shall be submitted to the City attorney for approval within 90 days. 7. A revised plan show ing the 5.25 foot dedication and the extended drainage easement shall/be submitted to the planner within 90 days. 8. The revised Final Plat shall be recorded with the City Clerk within 90 days. June 21, 1985 John Belter 102 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 13 lot Industrial Subdivision Dear John: Enclosed are the agenda and a copy of my memo and Bill Szymanski's memo to the Planning Commission. The land dedication for the road improvement at the corner has been accepted by Bill as explained in my memo. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg Encls LO, D 0 I,LO q ,1-?-- PUBLIC BEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 25 1985, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final Plat application of George Watson for Subdivision of parcel into two lots of 12,000 square feet and approximately 16,550 square feet bounded by properties of Clairmont, Samenfeld-Sperh . Levin, Mitchell and White to the north, Stockwell to the Part, Liu to the south and west and is located at 40 Birch Street, 2) Final Plat application of Harold Benson for 16 unit planned unit. development in conjunction with two offices. Parcel is bounded by properties of Heisse, Merchants Properties, City of South Burlington, Myers, Parsons & Sons Lumber Company, Zachary and Jarvis and is located at 65 Patchen Road. 3) Final Plat application of John Belter for the continuation of the industrial subdivision with 13 new lots, #9 - #21 at Ethan Allen Farm. Property is bounded on the south by the Airport and National Guard Avenue, on the west by Shamrock Road, on the north by Ashline, Unsworth and the Winooski River and internally b4L Berard Shields, ShiffIer, Naef and the numerous residents of C'nunt-ry Club Estates and Burlington International Airport 4) Final Plat application of LTH, Inc., for the planned rnmmPrrial May 17, 1985 John Belter Ethan Allen Farm South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision Dear John: Enclosed are the minutes of the meeting at which your Preliminary Plat was approved. Please let me know when you are ready to file for Final Plat review. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcq 1 Encl cc: David Spitz 5/14/85 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Preliminary Plat application of John Belter for the 13 lot industrial subdivision of Ethan Allen Farm as depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Alllen Farm, Industrial subdivision Lots 9-21", as prepared by Warren A. Robenstein, dated April 1985, with the following stipulations: 1) The Final Plat shall show a 15 foot drainage easement bewteen lot #13 and the Belter Farm to drain the low area of Ethan Allen Drive. The exact location of the easement will be determined by the applicant and the City Engineer prior to Final Plat. Legal documents shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval. 2) Land'shall be dedicated to the City along the southern side of Airport Parkway to Shamrock Road to allow for a right turn into Ethan Allen Drive.I. An assessment shall be made of the value of this land so that credit'may_be granted towards the $15,000 fee assessed to Belt-er for iilplp�6vements to Ethan Allen Drive. L`)A five foot dedication of land along both sides of Ethan llen Drive"made to the City to upgrade the road. Legal documents shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval. 4) The need for additional fire hydrants will be determined by the Fire Chief at site plan review on individual lots. 5) All septic systems shall be installed for future hookup to the street. 6) This approval expires in 12 months. *out4 Nurlington Nire Department �j 575 Dorset *treet ' 1 *out4 +Nurlington, 13ermont 05401 MAy 9,198S Ms. Jane Bechtel Planner City Of South Burlington S7S Dorset Street So. Burlington, VErmont OS401 Dear Jane , Plans have been reviewed by the fire department on the Ethan Allen Farm lots . The only problem I see is that the main road should be upgraded to take care of the growth in that area. The size of the lots will set the regulation for the site of the buildings on each lot. If more then one lot is used to build a large building we may have to look at it to see if more services are needed. me. If you have any questions please feel free to call Sincerely James W. Goddette Sri. Chief OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF 863-6455 May 10, 1985 David Spitz P.O. Box 333 Winooski, Vermont 05404 Re: BEQ$er Industrial Subdivision Dear David: Enclosed are the agenda my memo and Bill's and Jim's comments. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg Encls P(.BLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLING" PLANNING CaMMISSION The South.Burlington Planning Commission will hold a p!blic hearing at the So th Burli�i-fU —Cfty Hal%., Conference -loom; 575-Dorset Str t,- South -Burl.ing.ton._ Vermont on Tuesday, May_1985,_ at TOO P: to consider -the—_ -__--- following: \� D•-.l 4••.4 Dl -i- ,,1 ii n4-ir`n of .Tnhn N_ RP7_inuin. t Q n of the industrial subdivision with 13 new lots, AU thrn„rth 11 • i at Ethan Allen Farm Property is bounded on t-hp ^ni,t-h by tha Air )ort and National Gua i on the north by Ashlibe, Unsworth and th�Winonski River, internally by Berard, Shields, Shiffler and Naef and Y the numerous residents of Country Club Estates 2) Revised final plat of O'RriPn Rrntherc,/Milot Prnnerti�� --- for a 24 unit planned residential development on the Rn11rdealt1Ryo property on Hinesburg Road Property is bounded on the Georgetown Condominiums,on the east and south by other lands of O'Brien and on:the west by Hinesburq Road. Sidney B..Poger Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission April 27, 1985 ETHAN ALLEN FARM ABUTTERS 1. Ray Unsworth, 1700 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 2. Rene; J. & June A. Berard, 101 Ethan Allen_. Drive, South Burlington, Vt. 05401� 3. S.T. Griswold, Williston, Vermont 05495 4. Martin C. & Ruth B. Schmidt, 8 Country Club Drive, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 5. Frank W. & Martha K. Lidral, 10 if it It 6. Richard J. & Lynne -Dell Dore, 12 of " to it 7. Donald R. & Carolyn S. McKenzie, 14 if " it 8. Marc A. & Margaret E. Roy, 16 9. Norman D. Brochu, 18 10. Robert G. & Yolande J. Turmel, 24 11. Stephen A. & Lisa G. Phelps, 26 12. George D. & Helena M. Brooks, 30 13. Susan T. Weed, 34 14. Charles M. & Ann M. Daley, 38 15. James A. & Jane E. Harrocks, 42 16. David B. & Patricia M. Myette, 46 17. Willard.B. & Elaine M. Knight, 41 Mt. View Blvd., South Burlington, Vt. 05401 18. Roger, 0. & Lessie A. Campbell, 37 it " If 19. Sally C. Guerette & Ruth C. Paul, 33 it if 20. Gladys L. Heath, 29 it 21. Wilhelm H. & Suzanne F. Kalweit, 25 it 22. Kevin L. & Marianne B. Harding, 91 Country Club Drive East, South Burl,Vt. 05401 23. Clayton E. & Dorothy C. Swartwood, 92 to to It 24. John W. & Carol A. Rowe,,96 it if it 25. Anton R. & Margaret A. Jaremczuk, 11 North Willard Street, Burlington, Vt. 05401 26. John J. & Janette T. Hamilton, 104 Country Club Drive East, So. Burl, Vt. 05401 27. Russell M. & Susan L. Agne, 110 it it " 28. Dennis M. & Linda A. Johnson, 114 29. Royce W. & Anita M. Irwin, 118 30. Edmund G. & Cynthia M. Fischer, 140 31. Tommaso D. & Elizabeth A. Rendino, 148 32. City of Burlington (Burlington International Airport) 33. Frank R. Naef & Randall C. Volk, 4 Park Terrace, Essex Junction, Vt. 05452 34. William E. Shfffler, Jericho, Vt. 05465 35. Randy M. Berard, 80 Ethan Allen Drive, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 36. Arthur F. Shields, Gary H. Mertens & Alfred J. Martell, 1350 Dorset St, So.Burl 05401 M E IN9 0 ft A N D u M TO: South Burlington City Council FROM: Sonny Audette DATE: January 3, 1986 ]ZE: 10 Ycar Construction Plan The following is a proposed 10 Year Construction Plan for the Street Department from the operating budget and bond issue. This may change from year to year due to emergencies. LOCATION Hadley Road Swift Street Deane St. & Woodcres t Airport Road Kimblall Avenue Victoria Drive Ethan Allen Drive Kimball Avenue Mills Avenue Barrett Street 1986-1987 PROJECT Curbs & Paving Crubs & Widening Repaving Repaving Matching Funds Drainage 1987-1988 Matching Funds Drainage Sidewalks 1988-1989 COST ESTIMATE s0 ,000 15,000 20 ,000 12,000 26,500 5 000 $128, 0 60 ,0.00 14,000 40 , 000 10 ,000 $1 —00- FUNDING SOURCE � O.B. 9rk agap 0 8 O.B. OB. O.B. BOND 0. B. O.B. B OND O.B. Ethan Allen Drive 40,000 O.B. Sherry Road Rebuild & Drainage 30,000 O.B. Patchen Road Matching Funds 20,000 O.B. Dorset Street (south) 56,000 BOND $1Tff; 0U-0 1989-1990 Patchen Road Matching Funds 20,000 O.B. Dorset Street (south) 50,000 BOND Van Sicklen Road Repave 20,000 O.B. Shelburne Road Sidewalks 22,000 O.B. Bartletts Bay Road Rebuild 10,000 O.B. $122t000 10 Year Construction Plan, PAGE 2 1990-1991 COST LOCATION PIZOJECT ESTIMATE Dorset Street (south) 2S,000 Dorset Street (south) 50,000 Cottage Grove Repave 15,000 Bartletts Bay Road Repave 2S,000 San Remo Drive Repave 35 000 $ 140,000 1991-1992 Kennedy Drive (west) Matching Funds 75,000 White Place 10,000 Dorset Street (south) 20,000 $ 105,000 1992-1993 Kennedy Drive (west) Matching Funds 50 000 Kennedy Drive (east) Matching Funds 40,000 Dorset Street ((south) 30,000 $ 120 , 0 1993-1994 Kennedy Drive (east) Matching Funds 50,000 Imperial Drive Rebuild $ Pave 25;000 Dorset Street (south) 2S 000 $ 10 ,000 1994-1995 East Terrace Drainage & Cumbs 100;Q00 1995-1996 East Terrace Rebuild & Pave; 100 $600 1996-1997' Baldwin Avenue Repave 15,000 Poor Farm Road (Paved Area) 15,000 ranglewood Drive Drainage $ Paving 20,000 qewton ,Avenue Repave 15,000 Country Club Drive Drainage & Repave 20,000 $85,000 FUNDING is SOU IZCF O.B. BONI) O.B. 0.13. O.B. • : r r O.B. O.B. O.B. O.B. i O.B. i PLANNING COMMISSION 3. JUNE 25, 1985 3. Nine parking spaces are waived by the Planning Commission. Twenty-six spaces shall be provided. 4. A wa Post office. to the bank and post office shall be constructed diagonally' 1 1_ 11_ __ l.__ _____ . .. .. ... _ _ 5. There shall be a 2 foot to 3 foot minimum grassed separation area .between the narking lot curbs and the sidewalk. 6. The sidewalk between the middle 4 unit structure and the easterly 6 unit structure shall cut diagonally across the grassed area. 7. An additional fire hydrant shalLbe installed and shown on the plan as specified by the Fire Chief unless the final plat shows that all buildings, new or existing, are within 300' of a hydrant, either new or existing 8. Revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner within 90 days 9. The final plat as revised shall be recorded with the City Clerk within 90 days. 10: This approval expires within 3 years. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Final Plat of John Belter for continuation of industrial subdivision wi 13 new lots -21 located on Ethan Allen Drive Mr. Belter removed himself from the discussion due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Spitz said everything was the same except that the soil tests had been done and had turned out very well. It was noted that the land dedication question had been worked out with the City Manager. Mr. Belter said he hoped that when and if they ever came back for more lots he hoped the issue would not come up again. He felt he had made his contribution to fixing the road. Mrs. Hurd pointed out that whenever a developer comes before the Commission, they always try to get as much as they can. I+Ir. Belter said he would like to pay for the improvements to the road on a per lot basis and the Commission agreed, if it were paid after the first 3 or 4 lots. 5 was agreed to. Mr. Dooley had a motion. He moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of John Belter for the 13 lot industrial subdivision as depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm, Industrial Subdivision Lots 9-21" as prepared by 'Warren A Robenstien, dated May 1985, with the following stipulations: 1. The drainage easement along the eastern part of the subdivision shall be extended to the drainage ditch along the back line of the lots. 2. On -site sewage disposal systems for each lot shall be installed in the front yards so that connection to a future sewer main in Ethan Allen Drive is possible. 3. A_5.25 foot strip of land on either side of Ethan Allen Drive shall be dedicated to the City for future street widening. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 25, 1985 4. The land at the intersection of Shamrock Road and Airport Parkway shall be dedicated to the City for intersection straightening. 5. The sum of $1000 shall be paid prior to each of the first 5 building permits for the improvements to Ethan Allen Drive. 6. Legal documents for the land dedication, the road widening dedication and the drainage easement shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval within 90 days. 7. k revised plan showing the 5.25 foot dedication and the extended drainage easement shall be submitted to the Planner within 90 days. 8. The revised final plat shall be recorded with the City Clerk within 0 days. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Final plat application of LTH, Inc., for the Planned Commercial development for a 200 unit hotel and existing restaurant located on the Benes Inn lot and lot #t10 of the LTH properties, at 1710 Shelburne Road Mr. Belter rejoined the Commission. Ms. Bechtel noted that this plan would provide for better fire protection. It was noted that the hydrological study had just been received tonight. Ms. Bechtel said she could summarize it. Data put through the computer model showed that a retention pond was needed, and a 44,000 gallon size had been recommended. It was also found that this area is close to the drainageway, so the peak runoff time for its drainage will come before the peak runoff from the Spear Street area gets to this part of the drainage ditch. Mr. Krebs said fir. Larkin had agreed to put in a pond, even though they do not feel it is needed. Mr. Dooley wondered whether, if the drainage in this area were slowed through the retention pond, it would then be released when the peak upstream drainage passed by, thus increasing the Problem. Ms. Bechtel said she would ask the consultants. Mr. Krebs said they would install a series of catch -basins and would plan on flooding the parking lots as a way to slow drainage discharge. They are not planning on one large pond. Pair. 13elter asked whether the study covered just the area planned for development, or the whole area. Mr. Dooley said he did not want to see 200 units with access only to Shelburne Road. He noted that this plan did not show lot 10, through which the secondary access will pass. Mr. Larkin said they would build that road. Mrs. Hurd noted that the Fire Chief had told the Commission that he could not guarantee protection to something this large this far from the station. :,Ir. Jacob noted that the city had mutual protection and raid with --;helburne, and he said that the Council was looking into land for a station on Shelburne Road. ";s. Bechtel said revised landscaping plans were needed. 10r. Scott Tower of 4 Seasons went over the lr;ridscaping plans. Mrs. Xaher wanted the Planner to carefully review the landscaping plans. Ms. Bechtel said this was the first she had seen of it but she would verify the worth. Mr. Reg Boucher said he was the president of the Bartletts Bay Association and he asked about the drainage report. He asked for a copy and said he would like to review it before final approval was given. The Commission said they might like to talk to the consultants about the report and Mr. Jacob wanted the City Engineer's comments on it. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 14, 1985 3. A $20,000 performance bond for landscaping shall be posted prior to permit. The plan will show sufficient evergreens on the berm bordering Hinesburg Road to screen the development in the winter wont s. revised landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval within 30 days. 4. A bond for utilities shall be posted prior to permit in an amount determined by the City Engineer. 5. Snow fences shall be erected and maintained during construction around existing vegetation that is to be saved and along the CO zone. 6. The drainage system shall be agreed to by the City Engineer prior to permit. 7. A drainage swale shall be provided behind the unit adjacent to the Georgetown condominiums, and shall be shown on the plan. 8. A contribution toward the intersection improvements on Hinesburg Road/ — Kennedy Drive shall be made prior to and in advance of the issuance of a building permit in an amount determined by the City Planner in accordance with the formula. 9. All necessary legal documents shall be filed with the City Attorney within 90 days. 10. The Final Plat shall be recorded with the City Clerk within 90 days. Upon filing, all prior approvals are null and void. 11. The final plat shall clearly state that "this plan supersedes all other plats for this parcel." 12. Building permits must be obtained within 3 years. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Preliminary Plat application of John Belter for continuation of the industrial subdivision with 13 new lots at Ethan Allen Farm Mr. Belter removed himself from the discussion due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Spitz said Mr. Belter wanted to create 5 lots on the north of the road, 5 on the south, and an additional 3 lots near the intersection. Ti.ese will be on a private right of way. Room has been left for a future right of way to the back land, although nothing is planned for that area now. The back line of the lots has been matched with the Berard lots. Regarding lots 19, 20 and 21, Mr. Spitz said the road to serve them was in the 100 year flood area, so they planned to raise the grade of the road out of that floodplain area. It was noted, however, that they did not plan to raise the level of Ethan Allen Drive, so this road would have to dip to make the connection to Ethan Allen. The Commission felt it would be all right to have the entrance road be the same level as Ethan Allen Drive. Mr. Spitz said that when Mr. Berard requested permission for his lots, the city had said that Ethan Allen Drive would have to be upgraded, and that Mr. Berard and Mr. Belter should contribute to the cost of improving the intersection here. It was also felt that a right turn lane for cars coming onto Ethan Allen Drive should be added. Ms. Bechtel said there were 3 items here - a 5' dedication PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 14, 1985 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, May 14, 1985 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; William Burgess, Mary -Barbara Maher, Judy Hurd, Peter Jacob, John Belter, John Dooley Others Present Jane Bechtel, City Planner; Rudolph Fischer, Richard Pedrick, Stewart McConaughy, Allen Kieslich, Kevin Harding, David Spitz, Frank Davis, George Stern, Michael Dugan, Doug Fitzpatrick, Walt Adams, Roger Dickenson, Mr. Thomas, Ruth Poger, The Other Paper Minutes of May 7, 1985 The May 7, 1985 minutes were approved on a motion by Mr. Jacob, a second by Mrs. Hurd, and a unanimous vote. Revised final plat of Bourdeau-R e Planned Unit Development by O'Brien Brothers Milot Partnership for construction of 24 units on 4 acres, located on Hinesburg Road Ms. Bechtel noted that the number of units had been reduced from 28 to 24. All setbacks are maintained, and the distance between buildings is at least 30'. The Fire Chief has no problem with the plan. Ms. Bechtel noted that the City Manager/Engineer wanted curbs in the project to protect the grass, but Mr. Belter noted that without curbs, fire trucks could get closer to the buildings if they needed to. Mr. Burgess came in at this time. Mr. Kieslich felt there was no engineering reason for curbing and said he would prefer not to -put it in. He said it would not begesthetic, would be expensive, would be hard to maintain in the winter, and that the fire chief did not want it. The Commission did not feel curbs were needed. Mr. Poger said a sidewalk to Hinesburg Road was needed. It can be bituminous, and should be separate from the traffic coming in. Because the entrance road was short, though, other Commission members did not feel a sidewalk was needed. Mr. Fitzpatrick said there would be a 5' berm between Hinesburg Road and these units. Mrs. Maher wanted evergreens planted on top of the berm. She wished the Commission would go on record as preferring evergreens over deciduous plantings where possible because they provide screening in the winter as well as summer. Mr. Dooley moved that the Ljouth Burlin t n Planning Commission approve the revised final plat of U'Brien Brotiers Milot Properties for a 24 unit planned unit development as depicted on plans entitled "Bourdeau-Rye Properties: Revised Final Plat" renared by FitzpAtri k-I1 w llyn, Inc._, dated March IC465__ stamp dated P'Iay 9. 1985 with the followingstipulations: 1. A sidewalk shall be constructed from the corner of Kennedy Drive to the entrance to the development. A bond shall be posted prior to permit in an amount determined by the City Engineer. 2. A recreation fee of $200 per unit shall be paid prior to permit. PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 14, 1985 on each side of Ethan Allen Drive, a formula for the cost of road improvements that the city would do (Berard to pay $5,000 and Belter to pay $15,000), and the dedication of land for the right turn lane. The U20,000 is to widen, ditch, and drain the area. Mr. Spitz said Mr. Belter was suggesting that he be given credit towards his $15,000 cost for the value of the land for the right turn lane. Perhaps instead of just giving the amount of land needed for the improvement, the city should take the entire lot. The area needed was, very roughly 1112 an acre, Mr. Spitz guessed. The entire lot is about 1 acre. Mr. Dooley said he would prefer to let the City Manager make any deals of that kind. Mr. Poger said that the Commission wanted any such deal made before final plat, or they would require enough land for the lane. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of John Belter for the 13 lot industrial subdivision of Ethan Allen Farm as depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Farm, Industrial subdivision lots 9-21", as prepared by Warren A Robensten, dated April 1985, with the following stipulations: 1. The final plat shall show a 15 foot drainage easement between lot #13 and the Belter Farm to drain the low area of Ethan Allen Drive. The exact location of the easement will be determined by the applicant'and the City Engineer prior to final plat. Legal documents shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval. 2. The applicant shall pay the amount of $15,000 for improvements to Ethan Allen Drive. 3. Land shall be dedicated to the city along the southern side of Airport Parkway to Shamrock Road to allow for a right turn into Ethan Allen Drive. 4. A five foot dedication of land along both sides of Ethan Allen Drive shall be made to the city to upgrade the road Legal documents shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval 5. _Zhe need for additional fire hydrants will be determined by the Fire Chief at site plan review of individual lots. 6. All septic systems shall be installed for future hookup to the street 7. This approval expires in 12 months. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion and all voted for it. Mr. Belter rejoined the Commission. Consider site plan application of George Stern and Stan Davis, ayerit to convert the 18,000 sq. ft. Agel-Corman Furniture building into six retail shops and 6,000 sq. ft. of office space located at 518 Shelburne Road "s. Bechtel said the Zoning Board had apijroved the multiple use of the building, out had been concerned about parking. She noted that there was existing office space on the second floor of the building. Mr. Dugan said the second floor would remain unchanged. Entrances to the proposed retail stores would be on the south side of the building. He said there was a diagonal right of way from the entrance across from Home Avenue heading toward the Factory Outlet building. This will remain, and they would like to use timber edged planters to direct traffic in the lot. Parking to the 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 14, 1985 south of the building would be diagonal. Mr. Jacob felt the rows of parking closest to Shelburne Road should be closed at the ends along the diagonal right of way, but it was noted that a 50' right of way existed parallel to Shelburne Road in that area, so those aisles could not be closed, without the permission of everyone with rights to the right of way. Mr. Poger noted that if that right of way had to remain,'he was not sure parking could be put in it. The parking reduces the 50' width to much less than that. It was noted that Mr. Thomas owned the building and the land under it, but the land around the building was owned by Mr. Farrell. Mr. Thomas said the parking to the west of the building was parking in common and he had rights to that. He said no one was currently using that parking with him, of Mr. Farrell's tenants. If Mr. Farrell decided to develop further in the future, he has rights to this parking in common and it would have to be shared. Mr. Dooley noted that 124 parking spaces were shown and 149 were required. He asked if 25 more could be obtained. Mr. Thomas said people could park in the Old Board lot during the day when that lot is not used by the Old Board. Mr. Thomas said he had enough parking - he has rights in the Kravco lot. Mr. Poger said again that he wished Mr. Farrell would show the Commission a plan for what he wants to do with the whole area. Mr. McConaughy, representing Mr. Farrell, stated that there was an area known as O'Dell Parkway or Market Square. This is a right of way which was once considered as a possible public street connecting eventually to Farrell St. Kravco said it would not use this right of way, preferring the diagonal one, so they put parking in that area, which they have no rights to. He said he was concerned that the Commission had counted those spaces for the Outlet and might count them again for Mr. Thomas. He said Mr. Farrell might want those spaces in the future. Mr. McConaughy said Mr. Thomas owned his building and the land under it, and had exclusive rights to parking between the south line of his property and the northern line of Market Square (25-30'), about 10' of space to the north of the building, and about 25' of space to the east. In addition to that, he has rights in common with others for parking in the area between the west side of the building and Shelburne Road in an area bounded by the extension of the north and south lines of the building to the west. This produces a rectangular area the same depth as the building. Mr. Poger noted that if he were shopping in the area, he would just take a space where he could find it and he wondered if there were enough parking in the area for the proposed use plus the existing uses. Mrs. Maher asked the Planner to take the square footage of the Thomas building plus the Outlet building and weigh the parking requirements against the total spaces available. She noted, however, that she was negative on this plan and did not feel it should be approved without enough spaces. Mr. Dooley asked about the 16 spaces to the east of the building and Mr. McConaughy said he did not know who had rights there. Xr. Poger asked the applicant and Mr. Farrell to discuss with the Planner whether tiiere were enough spaces here, before the next rueeting. Mr. Dooley wanted to know how often the spaces Kravco claimed are actually used by Outlet customers. Mrs. Maher was not sure she wanted to waive a lot of spaces, since she felt parking was bad in that area now. Mr. Burgess felt the right of way issue had to be settled and Mr. Belter agreed. Mr. Dooley said he had thought the parking was going to be the easy issue. He said he did not feel he could vote for it because it was so far out of compliance with the traffic overlay zone. Mr. Poger warned the applicants that even if the parking were settled, it did not mean approval would be given, and PLANNING COMMISSION to Plan aDPlication for construction of a 5800 sq. ter retive Data --System IDS building, at ahelburne MARCH 12, 1985 ft. addition to the n _ I Mr. Steve Harris said they would be adding an additional 5800 sq. ft. to the building, for similar use, which is office and warehouse. There are .presently 66 employees and they want to add enough room for an additional 25. He said an additional 21 parking spaces had been provided, and that seemed adequate, since there was enough parking now. Access around the back of the building will be improved for fire protection. The building will be lengthened toward the north, but the addition will match the present building in style and materials. Mr. Harris explained the landscaping plan. They are still short $500. Mr. Poger suggested more plantings between the building and the parking lot, and perhaps some more in front of the parking lot. Mrs. Maher moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Breadloaf Construction for the construction of a 5800 sq. ft. addition to the existing office building at 1500 Shelburne Road as_deoicted on a plan entitled "Interpretive Data Systems 1500 Shelburne Road", prepared by Breadloaf Construction Company, Inc., dated February 6, 1985 with the following stipulations• 1. Twenty-one parking spaces shall be provided for this addition Two_ spaces are waived The spaces shall be paved in a uniform--arQ. not sawloothed as shown. 2. Revised landscaping with a value of $7500 shall be submitted to the__ City Planner for approval A bond in this amount shall be osted�rior to permit - 3. A sewer allocation of 375 gpd shall be allocated in accordance with - the South Burlington Sewer Policy. -- 4. Building permits shall be obtained within 6 months. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and all voted aye. Sketch Plan applicatio of John Belter for expansion of Industrial subdivision with 13 n-Alien Drive Mr. Belter removed himself from the discussion due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Spitz noted that most of the lots were straightforward. Room has been left to reach the land behind the lots next to the Berard land' He said that lots 2-6 as well as 19-21 backed up to a swale that was in the floodplain. All these lots will have usable area in front, but will not be buildable in the rear. Access to lots 19-21 will be through a private drive coming off' Ethan Allen Drive. Mr. Poger noted that usually roads were allowed to cross the floodplain, but not run through it as this one does. He noted that the real problem here will be the intersection of Ethan Allen Drive and Airport Parkway. Mr. spitz said. they would look into what could be done. Mr. Brennan noted that at one time there had been discussion about straightening Airport Parkway so it went straight from the top of the hill to the Limekiln Bridge'.-" Mr. Poger said that perhaps should be discussed with the City Council. Mr. Belter was asked why his lots did not go back as far as Mr. Berard's did. He said Mr. Berard had wanted to use all his land, whereas he wanted to provide 40,000 sq. ft. lots. People usually want smaller lots. /l 2. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 20, 1983 office, but that if it were to be a tenant, he would like a traffic analysis done. He directed the Planner to do a traffic count and look up the criteria for this zone, because he felt this tenant would cause a problem. Mr. Jacob objected that Soutay Burlington did not even own the street there - Burlington did and we have a letter from them saying there is no problem. Mr. Poger did not want to create an unsafe situation for citizens of either city. He said approval for the plan could be given and Mr. Farrell asked to return for approval of the uses based on the city's traffic criteria. Mr. Burgess felt the City Attorney should be consulted on South Burlington's ability -to control traffic in the city of Burlington, and Mr. Ward was requested to seek such an opinion from the Attorney. Mr. Poger felt .that if Mr. Farrell came in with a plan for 5 retail uses, no one on the Commission would have a problem with that. 'If he came in with a post office or other high..traffic use, he felt that use should be submitted to the Planner and a traffic analysis done. If there is any question, it should be resubmitted to the Commission. Mr. Jacob did not agree.with that, but Messrs. Burgess -and Belter and Mrs. Hurd indicated they could, as did Mr. Mona and Mrs. Maher. Mr. Poger so ruled. Mr.'Jacob moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission grant site plan approval for the application of Gary Farrell for conversion of the existing Sherwin-Williams, 370 Shelburne Road into five retail shops as depicted on a plan_ entitled "Site Plan, 370 Shelburne Road" dated August 11, 1983, and revised_ September 19, 1983, subject to the following stipulations: 1. That the most souther to State highway standards. curb cut along Shelburne Road be closed, accord 2. That sewage increase into the Burlington system be accepted by the City and that a letter be filed with the City Engineer confirming acceptance. 3. A performance bond for landscaping in the amount of $8,000 and $1,000 for curb closing shall be posted with the City prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Should one of the tenants be the United States Post Office or any other traffic generator the developer shall inform the City administrative officer ill have a traffic analysis done for approval of the use by the Planning Commission. 5. This approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. Mr. Poger noted that the Commission would still like to have a legal opinion regarding the Commission's ability to regulate traffic spilling onto Burlington streets. Mr. Farrell was warned that if he did come back with the post office as a tenant, it was possible the Commission would not approve the use. The motion carried unanimously.._____ Final plat a Allen Drive t industrial subdivision, E Mr. Belter removed himself from the discussion due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Ward said there had been no changes since preliminary plat approval on July 13, 1983. Mr. Berard said he would donate a 5' strip on land on both sides of the road plus the land that is needed at the 4 corners to straighten out the road. The a PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 20, 1983 latter parcel is now large enough to do something with, but once he gives up part of it, it will not be. He told the Commission he would give the whole thing to the city. Mr. Ward read the preliminary plat approval motion, which mentions a contribution to the cost of --improving Ethan Allen Drive. That road is a city street. Mr. Poger noted that the land to be donated hact a value and that might be considered part of the contribution. Mr. Berard said there were letters between him and former Planner Spitz discussing this issue. Mrs. Maher felt the land in question had to be tied down. It needs to be described specifically so everyone knows what is being discussed. Mr. Berard said the school bus shelter.sits on the parcel now. Mrs. Maher wanted to know the dimensions of the piece and what would be left if 20' were removed. None of the Commission members spoke against donation of the land in lieu of the contribution. $20,000 worth of improvements to the road was a figure mentioned by the City Engineer to have city labor drain and ditch the road. The division between Mr. Berard and Mr. Belter was set at $5,000 and $15,000. Mr. Belter mentioned that the city owned the road, and that counting the cost of the 5' on both sides that he was going to have to donate, he would be spending a lot of money to improve a road the city feels is a low priority. He was not sure he and Mr. Berard were being treated the same way other developers in the city are. Mr. Poger noted that the road was not built to city standards and that if it were a private road, it would still have to be built to city standards. The contribution is to bring it up to standards. Mr. Poger felt an assessment should be made to improve the road, ,and before a building permit was issued, either the cash, or land in lieu of cash should be offered. The land should be evaluated by the Planner and submitted to the Commission to be sure it was equal to or greater than the assessment. There was some discussion of the. ratio and Mr. Mona moved that an amount of S20,000 total and a ratio of $15,000 to $5,000 for Mr. Belter and Mr. Berard be used. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. Mr. Mona noted that if the motion passed, land could be given in lieu of cash, and Mr. Belter asked if that land included the 5' on both sides of the road. He was told it would not. Mr. Ward noted that this was a substandard road, and if no road at all existed there, Mr. Belter would have to pay a great deal to build one. He felt an assessment was fair. Mr. Jacob felt the city had an obligation to improve the road on a timely basis. The motion carried with all in favor. Mr. Jacob moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application by Rene J. Berard for an 8 lot industrial subdivision on Ethan Allen Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Property of Rene Berard, Final Plat" dated August 19, 1983 as prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates with the following stipulations: 1. Legal documents including a five (5) foot offer of dedication on both sides of Ethan Allen Drive for the purpose of widening and ditching and the lana necessary to improve the intersection of Ethan Allen Drive, Shamrock Road and Airport Parkway as suggested by the City Engineer shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to issuance of any permits. 2. That the Fire Chief review the final plat to determine the need for additional fire hydrants. 3• Final plat shall be recorded within 90 days. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. It was noted that the land referred to in #1 was a piece bordered by Ward, Shamrock Road and Airport Parkway. Mr. Berard has offered the entire piece to the city. The motion carried unanimously. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 20, 1983 office, but that if it were to be a tenant, he would like a traffic analysis done. He directed the Planner to do a traffic count and look up the criteria for this zone, because he felt this tenant would cause a problem. Mr. Jacob objected that South Burlington did not even own the street there - Burlington did and we have a letter from them saying there is no problem. Mr. Poger did not want to create an unsafe situation for citizens of either city. He said approval for the plan could be given and Mr. Farrell asked to return for approval of the uses based on the city's traffic criteria. Mr. Burgess felt the City Attorney should be consulted on South Burlington's ability to control traffic in the city of Burlington, and Mr. Ward was requested to seek such an opinion from the Attorney. Mr. Poger felt that if Mr. Farrell came in with a plan for 5 retail uses, no one on the Commission would have a problem with that. If he came in with a post office or other high traffic use, he felt that use should be submitted to the Planner and a traffic analysis done. If there is any question, it should be resubmitted to the Commission. Mr. Jacob did not agree.with that, but Messrs. Burgess -and Belter and Mrs. Hurd indicated they could, as did Mr. Mona and Mrs. Maher. Mr. Poger so ruled. Mr.'Jacob moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission grant site plan approval for the application of Gary Farrell for conversion of the existing Sherwin-Williams, 370 Shelburne Road into five retail shops as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan, 370 Shelburne Road" dated August 11, 1983, and revised September 19, 1983, subject to the following stipulations: 1. That the most southerly curb cut along Shelburne Road be closed, according to State highway standards. 2. That sewage increase into the Burlington system be accepted by the City and that a letter be filed with the City Engineer confirming acceptance. 3. A performance bond for landscaping in the amount of S8,000 and $1,000 for curb closing shall be posted with the City prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Should one of the tenants be the United States Post Office or any other high traffic generator the developer shall inform the City administrative officer who will have a traffic analysis done for approval of the use by the Planning Commission. 5. This approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. Mr. Poger noted that the Commission would still like to have a legal opinion regarding the Commission's ability to regulate traffic spilling onto Burlington streets. Mr. Farrell was warned that if he did come back with the post office as a tenant, it was possible the Commission would not approve the use. The motion carried unanimously. aDDlicatio Mr. Rene Berard, $)lot industrial subdivision, Ethan Allen Drive Mr. Belter removed himself from the discussion due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Ward said there had been no changes since preliminary plat approval on July 13, 1983. Mr. Berard said he would donate a 5' strip on land on both sides of the road plus the land that is needed at the 4 corners to straighten out the road. The 12 PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 20, 1983 latter parcel is now large enough to do something with, but once he gives up part of it, it will not be. He told the Commission he would give the whole thing to the city. Mr. Ward read the preliminary plat approval motion, which mentions a contribution to the cost of improving Ethan Allen Drive. That road is a city street. Mr. Poger noted that the land to be donated had: a value and that might be considered part of the contribution. Mr. Berard said there were letters between him and former Planner Spitz discussing this issue. Mrs. Maher felt the land in question had to be tied down. It needs to be described specifically so everyone knows what is being discussed. Mr. Berard said the school bus shelter sits on the parcel now. Mrs. Maher wanted to know the dimensions of the piece and what would be left if 20' were removed. None of the Commission members spoke against donation of the land in lieu of the contribution. t20,000 worth of improvements to the road was a figure mentioned by the City Engineer to have city labor drain and ditch the road. The division between Mr. Berard and Mr. Bolter was set at $5,000 and $15,000. Mr. Bolter mentioned that the city owned the road, and that counting the cost of the 5' on both sides that he was going to have to donate, he would be spending a lot of money to improve a road the city feels is a low priority. He was not sure he and Mr. Berard were being treated the same way other developers in the city are. Mr. Poger noted that the road was not built to city standards and that if it were a private road, it would still have to be built to city standards. The contribution is to bring it up to standards. Mr. Poger felt an assessment should be made to improve the road, and before a building permit was issued, either the cash, or land in lieu of cash should be offered. The land should be evaluated by the Planner and submitted to the Commission to be sure it was equal to or greater than the assessment. There was some discussion of the ratio and Mr. Mona moved that an amount of $20,000 total and a ratio of $15,000 to $5,000 for Mr. Bolter and Mr. Berard be used Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. Mr. Mona noted that if the motion passed, land could be given in lieu of cash, and Mr. Belter asked if that land included the 5' on both sides of the road. He was told it would not. Mr. Ward noted that this was a substandard road, and if no road at all existed there, Mr. Bolter would have to pay a great deal to build one. He felt an assessment was fair. Mr. Jacob felt the city had an obligation to improve the road on a timely basis. The motion carried with all in favor. Mr. Jacob moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application by Rene J. Berard for an 8 lot industrial subdivision on Ethan Allen Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Property of Rene Berard, Final Plat" dated August 19, 1983 as prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates with the following stipulations: 1. Legal documents, including a five (5) foot offer of dedication on both sides of Ethan Allen Drive for the purpose of widening and ditching and the lan necessary to improve the intersection of Ethan Allen Drive, Shamrock Road and Airport Parkway as suggested by the City Engineer shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to issuance of any permits. 2. That the Fire Chief review the final plat to determine the need for additional fire hydrants. 3. Final plat shall be recorded within 90 days. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. It was noted that the land referred to in #1 was a piece bordered by Ward, Shamrock Road and Airport Parkway. Mr. Berard has offered the entire piece to the city. The motion carried unanimously. M E M O R A N D U M To: Richard Ward, Zoni gAdministrative Officer From: Raymond J. Belai-F, ning and Planning Assistant Re: Ethan Allen Drive 5.25 foot strip Date: March 22, 1994 The proposed development of a lot on Ethan Allen Drive prompted me to research the status of a 5.25 foot strip of land along that street which was to be dedicated to the City. I found that the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for this strip was recorded but it has never been accepted. I spoke with Sonny about this, and he saw no reason why the City should not accept this strip of land. It is my recommendation that the City accept this strip of land. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: May 13, 1986 agenda items Date: May 9, 1986 2) LOTHROP PROPERTY, KIRBY ROAD 1. Same comments regarding drainage, tree removal as in preliminary plan review. 2. A neighbor along Duval Street is interested in a small corner (south-east) to square off their lot. I have no objection to this being done. 3) ETHAN ALLEN FARMS, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE 1. Same comments as previously submitted. 4) HARBOR INN, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Same comments as previously submitted. 6) 1. PARTNERSHIP TIRE AND SERVICE, INC., SHELBURNE ROAD Site shall include runoff control. 2. There should be a separation between the westerly property line and the gravel drive to serve as a snow storage areaa. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commissior�� �Oftv . From: Jane B. Lafleur, City Plannerff// Re: May 13, 1986 agenda items Date: May 9, 1986 2) LOTHROP SUBDIVISION, 157 KIRBY ROAD Mr. & Mrs. Lothrop propose to subdivide the 3.1 acre parcel between 99 and 171 Kirby Road into 3 lots of .28 acres each, enlarge the existing properties at 99 and 171 Kirby Road and dedicate the remaining two acres to the City. The property is zoned R4. Although the lots will be of adequate size for a duplex on each (12,000 square feet minimum), the Zoning Board has already granted a variance for the single-family frontage requirement of 80 feet; each lot has 76.1 feet of frontage. During Sketch plan review, Bill Szymanski noted that the large tree near 99 Kirby Road should be saved. There are two enormous trees and they are very much alive. 3) BELTER, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE, LOTS #9 - #21 John Belter neglected to record the mylar for these 13 lots within the required 90 days. Therefore, this subdivision is invalid. It was approved on June 25, 1985. The Commission has approved site plans for a number of lots in the first phase of the subdivision. All Act 250 permits have been obtained and all legal documentation is in order. Access: Lots #9 through #18 will access directly onto Ethan Allen Road. These driveway intersections have adequate site distance. A private road will be constructed to access lots #19, #20 and #21. Each lot will need separate site plan approval prior to construction. All lots will have on site sewage dispo- sal; systems must be installed so that a future connection to a sewer main in Ethan Allen Drive is possible. Traffic Impact: A 5.25 foot wide strip of land on either side of Ethan Allen Drive will be dedicated to the City for future street widening. Mr. Belter also dedicated land at the intersection of Shamrock Road and Airport Parkway so the intersection could be straightened. Also, he will pay $5,000 in $1,000 installments for future road improvements. Other traffic information that was presented to the Environmental Commission and their findings are enclosed. The Environmental Commission noted, as did the Planning Commis- sion, the unsafe intersection at Ethan Allen Drive. The Environ- 1 mental Commission retained the right to require Mr. Belter to install improvements at this intersection (stop sign or signal) until the last lot is sold. The maximum amount of trips in the 13 lot subdivision was limited to 815 weekday vehicle trips and 163 p.m. peak hour vehicle trips. (See enclosed Act 250 permit) Given the projected volume and the condition of Ethan Allen Road, I think it is essential that the City upgrade this road and straighten the intersection promptly. 4) LARKIN HOTEL, 1710 SHELBURNE ROAD This final plat application was reopened due to the failure to record the plat within 90 days. The Commission approved the plat on July 23, 1985. A recap of the issues follows: Project description: The project includes an addition to the 197 seat restaurant and the construction of 200 motel units in four buildings, 209 additional parking spaces and related site improvements. It is located on lots #10 and #11 of the previ- ously approved Bartlett property. This hotel/restaurant was reviewed using site plan criteria since it is different from a planned commercial development that has a number of different uses. For example, Lakewood Associates, with a restaurant and office facility (uses that are not commonly combined) was a legitimate PCD. As noted by the City Attorney, a restaurant and hotel are commonly together. However, this project did require a subdivision of lots; lot #10 was subdivided and therefore the public hearing and three step review process was followed. In sum, the subdivision process was followed and site plan criteria was used. The Commission used the Traffic Overlay criteria, not P.C.D. level of service criteria. In my opinion, this was handled correctly. Access and Circulation: Access will be through the existing driveway to the restaurant. A separate -left and right turn exit lane will be constructed . A road will connect to Harbor View Road at the eastern end of the property. This will remove some of the traffic impact on Shelburne Road and may make turns onto Shelburne Road easier since they will access at a better intersection. This road must be completed prior to occupancy. Traffic: As I noted at the last meeting, Craig Leiner has offered to critique the traffic study prepared for the developer but did not have the time to do an independent analysis. His comments are enclosed. Craig can not be present at this meeting. If necessary we can postpone discussion until he is available although I think we should at least begin to hear the data. The traffic overlay zone allows 481 trip ends during the peak hour for this 9.8 acre parcel. The hotel/restaurant projects 146 peak hour trip ends. The level of service at Green Mountain Drive/ Bartlett Bay 2 Recreation Fee: permit. The fee of $200 per unit must be paid prior to Landscaping: The Preliminary Plat required a landscaping plan with a value of $350 per unit or $5600. The proposed plan shows about $4600. Additional plantings are needed in front of the units. See Bill's memo regarding the grassed strips between the parking and the walkways in front of the units. The existing poplars on the site are probably worth at least $1000 and credit should be granted. Lilacs are proposed between the three new buildings along property line toward the Williston Road. 5) BELTER, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE This final plat meets the stipulations of Preliminary Plat. The drainage easement is shown from Ethan Allen Drive to the north. The 5 foot road dedication for road improvements should be shown on the plan and legals filed within 90 days. The City Manager has accepted the dedication of land at the intersection of Airport Parkway and Ethan All n Drive plus $5000 in lieu of the $15,000 contribution to road %provements. 6) LTH, HARBOR VIEW INN This final plat shows the 200 hotel rooms in 4 buildings plus the restaurant. The preliminary plat showed 3 buildings. The property is comprised of the former Benes Inn lot and part of Lot #10 of the LTH subdivision. Landscaping: The landscaping plan is being revised since it included $30,000 worth of top soil etc. which is not part of the formula. I expect to receive revised plans prior to the meeting. Access: The entrance drive shows a 2 lane exit and 1 lane exit as recommended by the traffic study. A 60 foot r.o.w. will continue through lot #10 to Harbor Road. Drainage: Plans and data have been submitted to Wagner, Heindel and Noyse. Their assessment is expected prior to the meet- ing. Parking: 269 spaces are shown which should be sufficient. Water and Sewer: The project is served by 8" water and sewer. The water is looped through the back of the lot to Harbor View Road. Other: See Chief Goddette's and Bill Szymanski's comments. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner Re: May 14, 1985 agenda items Date: 5/10/85 2) BOURDEAU-RYE, HINESBURG ROAD The applicant has revised this plan to show 24 units on 4 acres. All setbacks have been maintained and the distance between buildings equals or exceeds 30 feet in all cases. The driveways are 30' wide: internally with a 24" wide entrance drive. See Bill' s memo and letter from Chief Goddette. 3) JOHN BELTER, 13 LOT INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION John Belter proposes to subdivide a portion of his farm into 13 additional industrial lots in the Industrial -Commercial District. Ten lots (#9 - #18 are located between the Berard lots and the farm. Each one measures .96 acres. The floodplain is at the northern edge of five lots and should not obstruct construction. /0 Lots #19, 20, are located at the beginning of Ethan Allen Drive by the Airport Parkway/Shamrock Road intersection. These will be served by a 30 foot private road.onto Ethan Allen Drive. Bill has suggested that the'private driveway should be removed from the..floodplain. These lots are approximately 2 acres each. Ethan Allen Road must be improved. The Commission designed a formula at Mr. Berards"subdivision to assess Mr. Belter $15,000 and Mr. Berard $5,000 for the required improvements that include draining and ditching the road. A 5 foot dedication along both sides of Ethan Allen Drive is also required in order to upgrade the road to a width of 24 feet with 3 foot shoulders. The intersection at Shamrock Road and Ethan Allen Drive is poorly designed. There was no resolution of this problem at the Berard subdivision. Belters first subdivision urged resolution of this prior to further subdivision of this land. See Bill's memo. 4) DAVIS AND STERN, 512 SHELBURNE ROAD The applicant proposes to convert the Agel-Corman Furniture Store into 6 retail specialty shops (first floor) and retain the existing office space on the second floor. The property is zoned Cl. Circulation and Access: This property is part of the Farrell land. When the Outlet Mall was approved, the traffic was rerouted in this area. The curb cut is directly across from Home Avenue. The plan improves the traffic flow through this lot since it is now poorly defined and somewhat dangerous. I � �r M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: June 25, 1985 agenda items Date: 6/21/85 4) BENSEN DEVELOPMENT 1. Walkway from living units should tie into walkway toward bank and post office. 2. There should be a grassed separation between parking lot curb and sidewalk (2' - 3' minimum) to maintain entire width for pe- destrian traffic. 3. I recommend that the sidewalk between the middle 4 unit structure and the easterly 6 unit structure cut diagonally across grassed area. 5) ETHAN ALLEN FARM; --INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION 1. On site sewage disposal for individual lots shall -be so planned that when the sewer main is installed in Ethan Allen Drive, the service is as short and convenient to make as possible. I would recommend they be constructed in the front yards. 2. The r.o.w. width of Ethan Allen Drive is 49.5'. An additional 5.25' from each side should be deeded to the City to make it standard (60') and the necessary improvements can be made. 3. The drainage easement along the east part of this subdivision should extend to the drainage ditch. 6) HARBOR INN 1. Project should include a retenion pond to control run-off volume. It should be of a size determined by Wagner, Heindel and Noyse in consultation with the City. 2. The northerly side of parking lot should have a concrete curb to prevent runoff from entering adjacent property. There shall also be a swale along the north side because the area will be used for snow storage and the melting snow will run toward the adjacent property. uut4 Nurlingtnn Nire Department 575 Dorset *treet #nutli Nurlingtun, 'lRermnnt 05401 Ms. Jane Bechtel City Planner City Of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Ms. Bechtel, i Y C , OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF 863-6455 June 21,1985 Plans have been reviewed by the fire department on the Belter Farm lot sub -division on Ethan Allen Drive. As far as the development it's self I do not see a problem but the main road must be upgraded for the size of the development. me. If you have any Questions please feel free to call Si rely// a es W. Goddette Sr. C ief M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: May 14, 1985 agenda items Date: May 10, 1985 2) BOURDEAU-RYE, HINESBURG ROAD 1. A sidewalk should be included along access road to connect to sidewalk on Hinesburg Road. 2. Paved areas should include concrete curbs to protect landscaped areas except along the 24 foot entrance drive. 3) JOHN BELTER, 13 LOT INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION q 1. There should be a 15' drainage easement along the east side of lot 13 to drain the low area of Ethan Allen Drive. 2. The service road to serve 19, 20 & 21 should be out or along the limits of the floor zone area. 3. The intersection of Airport Parkway and Shamrock Road can be improved by adding a turning lane along the south side of Air- port Parkway to accommodate right turns and movements to Ethan Allen Drive. The land should be dedicated to the City and we will construct it. 4) AGEL CORMAN FURNITURE, 518 SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Site plan should show method of handling storm water. 2. Site has no area for snow storage. 3. The islands and landscaped areas should be lined with concrete curbs. 5) K.W. VENTURES, WILLISTON ROAD 1. Very undesireable location for this type of use. Being in the runway flight path, where there had been aircraft accidents in the past, the site should be a low people volume use. 2. There may be a stream setback that should be observed. The area, including downstream has to be carefull studied because the site serves as a ponding area. No permits should be issued until a study is completed to determine the impact and .such study is approved by the City. /. To: From: Re. Date: M E M O R A N D U M South Burlington Planning Commission William J . Szymanski, City Manager February 26, 1985 Agenda Items 2/22/85 4) VAL PREDA-PAPPAS, HOUGH STREET RELOCATION 1. A paved transitional flare shall be included where new street meets the reconstructed sidewalk in Baldwin Avenue. 2. A base slab shall be provided under the catch basin that inter- cepts the existing storm sewer on Baldwin Avenue. The catch basin can be a standard 21x2'. 3. Storm drain pipe type shall be specified on plans. It shall be P.V.C., concrete, or asbestoes cement. 4. Catch basin adjustment brick courses as shown on plans shall be precast concrete risers that are available in various thickness. 5) CHASTENAY, ETHAN ALLEN FARM, LOT NO. 4 1. Location of septic tank is not shown. Building plumbing should be so located that it can be connected to sewer main in the street. 2. Site shall be graded so that surface runoff is toward the east. 3. There shall be a depressed concrete curb across the entrance. 6) BABY FURNITURE OUTLET, 388 & 400 SHELBURNE ROAD 1. The eastern most Proctor Avenue road opening can be decreased by about 12 feet. 2. The parking lot spaces should be marked. 3. Work on Shelburne Street will require a permit from the City of Burlington. 4. There is a need for a sidewalk along Shelburne Street, however, it would have to be constructed with approval from the City of Burlington. If that is possible the front parking would conflict with pedes tr iarrs-.Qn the sidewalk. 7) ETHAN ALLEN FARM,)INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION 1. The proposed private road to serve lots 19,20 and 21 should intersect Ethan Allen Drive at 90 degrees. The traveled width should be not less than 20',easement should be 30' in width minimum. Memorandum February 26 Agenda Items 2/22/85 Page 2 2. Method of providing municipal sewage service to the area is shown in red on sketch plan. On site sewage disposal systems for each lot shall be so placed so that the future hookups can easily be made. A commitment from the developer for the proposed sewage pumping station site should be made. I would recommend a 50'x50' site as shown on sketch plan. 3. Unless there is a good reason, the back line of lots 9-18 should be a continuation of the adjacent Berard development lot line instead of the offset. Memorandum March 12, 1985 Agenda items March 8, 1985 Page 6 9) BELTER, INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION John Belter proposes to expand his 8--of industrial subdivision by creating 13 additional lots (numbered 9 to 21). Each lot measures at least 40,000 as required. The area is zoned Industrial -Commercial. The rear of three lots, #19,20 and 21, are officially designated as Flood Plain area. Uses are restricted in accordance with the ordinance. At subdivision of the first 8 lots, the Commission stipulated that improvements to the Ethan Allen Drive - Airport Parkway intersection shall be reconsidered. This was a major concern of the residents of Country Club Estates. Land in the Airport approach cone is subject to the provisions of Section 19.45. The airport's plans for extension of the north -south runway should be investigated.. See Bill's memo. 10) PETER JACOB, TWO LOT SUBDIVISION \ Peter Jacob proposes to subdivide and existing 1.07 acre parcel into two lots of 25,668 square feet and 21,168 square feet. There is a single-family uniton one of the lots. The area is zoned R4 and is located on Patchen Road. Both lots are of adequate size for a 2-family or a three-family structure, although neither meets the frontage requirement of 170 feet that is necessary for a 3-family .structure. Without a variance for frontage, these lots will be limited to duplexes. ADDEMDUM TO HARBOR VIEW INN: David Spitz has corrected the directional split contained in his study as follows: The directional split is 60% southbound and 40% northbound ON SHELBURNE ROAD, and the split from the lot is 61% (45 vehicles) northbound, and 39 % (29 vehicles) turning south. This makes the traffic access out of the lot much easier although the improvements recommended by David are still required. Also, I still believe a through driveway to the back of the lot is recommended. Memorandum February 26, 2/21/85 Page 3 1985 Agenda Items 6) BABY FURNITURE OUTLET, 388 and 400 SHELBURNE ROAD The applicant proposes to convert the former Ski Shop and adjacent building5for use as a retail childrens furniture and accessories store. The retail store will be in the main building (3600 square feet) and storage will be in adjacent buildings (1100 square feet) . Parking Presently ten the building. unlikely all needed most. Circulation parking spaces are in front and ten to the rear The applicant will keep all 20, although it is will be used at any one time. The front spaces of are There are 3 curb cuts at the front (2 on Shelburne Road, one on Proctor Avenue.) The applicant has agreed to close up the middle curb cut on Shelburne Road. This will require permission from the City of Burlington because it is their road. The curb cut to the rear parking lot will remain. Landscaping Proposed landscaping plan shows approximately $400 worth of new plant- ing. With a minimum area available, this plan is an improvement. 7) BELTER, INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION John Belter proposes to continue his 8-lot Industrial Subdivision by creating 13 additional lots (numbered 9-21). Each lot will be at least 40,000 square feet as required. The rear of three of the lots, #19, 20 and #21 and designated as flood plain area. No buildings can be constructed in this area, and uses are restricted in accordance with the ordinance. The w flood plain area to the north of lots #9-13 should be designated_ The Subdivision approval of the first 8 lots requires that when , � ui this land is further developed, improvements to the Ethan Allen Drive and Airport Parkway shall be reconsidered. Some of this land is in the Airport Approach Cone. This area should be shown on the plan and is subject to the provisions of section 19.45. The Airport will be contacted to determine the likelihood of extension of the north -south runway, as well. (See Bill's memo) � j �1 �-ar�nct ��..rr►rc.� -- `}o now, I 00o w.d'a. �,6� C eta n ,l c r. tie, r 6 cc 4-0 LaA a co,, Q & L.a.e... ,b�,x not i nci , rlC a� r , C� L f '"� VV , yt-I(, UP �t �(�s .on•. 1�tv1bi�� . ay��xv �� ►a-- �l wcur�'iuv.•A �) 1�t kct , a o , a VC& 114.:t. �Rz Ads . ��� c�_ c� State of Vermont 10 Subdivision & Public Building Permit LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. 4C0643-1 Chapter 3, Subdivisions APPLICANT John H. Belter, Jr. Chapter 4, Public Buildings ADDRESS Ethan Allen Drive Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal South Burlington, VT 05401 This project, consisting of Lots #19, #20, & #21 of the Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision, lot sizes ranging from 1.83 acres to 2.14 acres, located off Airport Parkway & Ethan Allen Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This Permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to construction. (2) The project must be completed as shown on the plans "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision Lots 9-21" dated August 1985 stamped by Warren A. Robenstien, L.S., Christopher Bishop, P.E., and Paul Duchesneau, P.E.; and in a letter dated October 29, 1986, to Ernest P. Christianson from Christopher Bishop, P.E., and which have been stamped APPROVED by the Division of Protection. No changes shall be made to the approved plan without prior written approval from the Agency of Environmental Conservation. (3) A copy of the approved plans and the Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (4) All conditions set forth in Permit number 4C0643, dated January 23, 1986, shall remain in effect except as amended or modified herein. (5) By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with the permit. WATER SUPPLY (6) Each lot is approved for connection to a municipal type water system approved by the Department of Health provided that all construction is in accordance with the approved plans and the Environmental Protection Rules, Effective September 10, 1982. SEWAGE. DISPOSAL (7) Lots #19, #20, & #21 are approved for the on -site subsurface disposal of wastewater within the soil boring and percolation testing area indicated on the certified plans. No buildings, roads, water lines, or other construction that might interfere with the installation or operation of the sewage disposal field is permitted on or near the continuous area. All isolation distances as set forth in Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 7, Appendix 7-D, shall be adhered to. Subdivision & Public Building Permit #4C0643-1 Page 2 (8) Each sewage disposal system shall be constructed as shown on the APPROVED plan and shall be operated at all times in a manner that will not permit discharge of effluent onto the surface of the ground or into the waters of the State. No construction (buildings, roads, water lines, etc.) that might interfere with the installation or operation of the sewage disposal field or its replacement area is permitted. All isolation distances as set forth in Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 8, Section 8-08, and Chapter 7, Appendix 7-D, shall be adhered to. (9) The installation of each sewage disposal system shall be inspected by a professional engineer registered in the State of Vermont who shall report in writing prior to use, that the work has been done in accordance with the approved plans and the permit. PLUMBING (10) No construction is permitted until such time as complete and satisfactory plans for the interior plumbing and ventilation have been submitted to and approved by the Protection Division. Dated in the Village of Essex Junction, Vermont, this 25th day of November, 1986. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer CC: Donald Robisky South Burlington Planning Commission / Katherine Vose Department of Health Department of Labor & Industry Warren A. Robenstien, L.S. Christopher Bishop, P.E. Paul Duchesneau, P.E. David Spitz Page 9 v=IXM• eMAW AU.CN I Findings of Fact #4C0643 AcT Q50 'F%"rj M C,S 15. Lots #19, #20 and #21 contain both level terrain and areas in which the slopes exceed 10%. The soils on these lots are Winooski fine sandy loams. Erosion control plans will be submitted at the time the development of the lots and the construction of the roads is planned (Exhibit #7, #32 and #36). The Commission will condition the construction of the access road and the sale and development of these lots as described in items 11, 12 and 14 of these Findings. SECTION 6086(a) (5) TRANSPORTATION: The Commission finds that this subdivision will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to transportation. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 16. Lots #9 through #18 will access directly onto the existing municipal road, Ethan Allen Road. These driveway intersections have adequate site distances (Exhibit #7). A private road is to be constructed to access Lots #19, #20 and #21,. Because the Applicant has not filed detailed information with respect to this road the Commission cannot alleviate its impact with respect to structure or site distances. Therefore, the Commission will prohibit the construc- tion of this road and the sale and/or development of these lots until an amendment application has been filed, which specifically addresses this criterion and, is approved by the Commission. 17. The Applicant estimates that these 13 lots will generate 815 average weekday trips and 163 PM peak hour trips per day. The existing industrial subdivi- sions on Ethan Allen Drive generate 982 average week- day trips and 197 PM peak hour trips per day. The total of 1797 average weekday trips and 360 PM peak hour trips will be added to existing Airport Parkway volumes of 5000 for an average day (36% increase) and 670 of the design peak hour (54% increase). This study concludes that, during the afternoon peak hours, congestion and back-ups can be expected on the side roads, that the periods of congestion on side roads should be relatively short in duration, that traffic on Airport Parkway should not be significantly affected, and that this subdivision will not cause undue congestion on Airport Parkway (Exhibit #25). Page 10 Findings of Fact #4C0643 The Commission notes that this intersection is diffi- cult because Airport Parkway is steeply sloped as it turns toward the northeast and into the intersection of Shamrock Road and Ethan Allen Drive. Blinking yellow caution lights have recently been installed at this intersection. Beyond concerns with the geometrics of this intersec- tion, the Regional Planning Commission has identified the Lime Kiln Bridge as being inadequate and in need of improvement (testimony of M. Munson). Because no party has identified any existing fund for either a traffic study of this area or bridge improvements, the Commission will not require a contribution from the Applicant. The Commission finds that the projected 16% increase an average daily traffic and the projected 24% increase in PM peak hour from the 13 lot subdivision the the projected 36% increase in average daily traffic and the projected 54% increase in peak hour traffic from the two existing subdivisions on Ethan Allen Drive are both substantial and could result in unsafe conditions at this intersection. Therefore, the Commission will retain the right to require that the Applicant install improvements at this intersection, being stop signs or an improved traffic signal until such time as the last lot is sold. The Commission will require that, prior to the commencement of any construction on any lot, the Applicant and any lot purchaser, and/or tenant file an amendment application which projects the average daily traffic and PM peak hour traffic and receive approval from the Commission. The Commission will limit the maximum traffic from this 13 lot subdivision to 815 weekday vehicle trips and 163 PM peak hour vehicle trips. State of Vern -writ. Department of Fish and Game Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Natural Resources Conservation Council C-�01"GAM Irx. �tL AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION September 24, 1985 Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 John H. Belter Jr. Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05401 RE: Application No. 4CO643 - 13 Lot Industrial Subdivision, Ethan Allen Road, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Mr. Belter: The Protection Division has reviewed the information submitted for the above referenced project. The information reviewed includes the plan for the subdivision identified as Ethan Allen Farm - Lots 9-21 dated August 1985 prepared by Warren A. Robenstien and the soil profiles and percolation tests provided by Mr. Christopher D. Bishop, P.E. Based on our review we offer the following comments: (1) All plans for the location of sewage disposal areas need to be stamped by a professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont. (2) The plans should identify a continuous area on each lot as specified in Chapter 3 - Subdivisions of the Environmental Protection Rules (each continuous area would be capable of disposing 450 gallons of effluent per day) or the engineer should design and locate on the plans a primary and replacement sewage disposal area for each lot. (3) Regarding the soils and possible location of the sewage disposal systems on each lot, we offer the following: A. Lots 9-12 , The soils are acceptable and the sewage disposal areas can be located anywhere on the lots provided all isolation distances to property lines, buildings, water lines, roadways and parking areas are met. B, Lot 13 - The sewage disposal area should be placed on the higher plateau and not in the low section near Ethan Allen Road. John H. Belter Jr. September 24, 1985 Page 2 C. Lots 14-18 - The sewage disposal areas should be located as close to Ethan Allen Road as permitted and maintain the isolation distances mentioned in A_above. D. Lots 19-21 - A possible seasonal high groundwater table was reported at 12 inches on each lot. It is recommended that ground- water monitors be placed on each of these lots within the proposed sewage disposal area and the goundwater levels recorded between March 1, 1985 and May 30, 1986. Each monitor would need to be read and recorded once each week during this period. Tt is asked that a plan showing the proposed sewage disposal areas and monitor locations be submitted for our review prior to installing the monitors. Upon receipt of the answers to the above comments, we will continue with our review. Should you have any questions in the meantime, please contact this office. Sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer CC Katherine'Vose City of South Burlington Christopher Bishop Warren Robenstien State of Vermont Department of Fish and Game Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Natural Resources Conservation Council AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office III West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 January 23, 1986 John H. Belter, Jr. Ethan Allen Drive So. Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Case #4C0643; Lots 19, 20 & 21, Airport Parkway, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Belter: The Protection Division has reviewed the soils report by Christopher Bishop, P.E., for lots 19, 20, and 21. Based on the soils reported by Mr. Bishop, and as observed by me, I offer the following. Please note, my comments are based on the plans referenced in Certification of Compliance 4C0643; Condition #1. Six test pits, identified as pits 20B, 20C, 20D, 21B, 21C, and 21D, located above ground elevation 245, show a minimum of 45 inches of permeable soil above a mottled soil. This area is suitable for an on -site subsurface sewage disposal system provided care is taken in the actual design and construction of the system to maintain the required depths of native soil below the bottom of the sewage disposal system to the seasonal high ground water table. Because the area available is limited in size, we have discussed the possibility of providing one sewage disposal area to accommodate 1, 2 or 3 of the lots. We also need to have shown that a primary and replacement sewage disposal system for a specified quantity of sewage can be located in this area and meet the required isolation distances to property lines, top of slope, etc. Therefore, we are not approving lots 19, 20, and 21 at this time and ask that the following items be forwarded: (1) A design of the sewage disposal system and replacement area. (2) The engineer's calculations for the proposed design flows to the proposed sewage disposal areas. (3) A proposal for which lots will be permitted to dispose of septic tank effluent to the sewage disposal system. Upon receipt of the above, and if found satisfactory, we can approve the proposed design and related quantity of sewage. We would then condition the approval that each proposed building would be evaluated based on the design flows to be disposed of to n John H. Belter, Jr. January 23, 1986 Page 2 the sewage disposal system. That is to say, if one building is constructed on lot 19, but the design flows for the building equals the design flows for the sewage disposal system, the building on lot 19 would be approved but no other construction on lot 20 or 21 would be permitted. Should you have any questions, pleast contact this office. EPC/bmg cc: Donald Robisky Katherine Vose City Planning Commission Christopher Bishop, P.E. David Spitz Warren Robenstien Sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer PLANNING COMMISSION 25 AUGUST 1987 PAGE 4 permitted exiting from the station. The applicant, working with the City Engineer, shall design the radius of the curbs to prohibit such t M s. The applicant shall furnish all signage for prohibiting such movements. The plans shall delineate all turning movements. 7. Approval is contingent upon there being no change in the status of the roadway between Gaynes and this Mobil station. A copy of the executed easement must be filed with the City Planner prior to permit. 8. The building permit must be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. In the vote which followed, the motion was defeated 3-4. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Final Plat application of John Belter, Jr. for a 21-lot subdivision of 38+ acres at Ethan Allen Farm, Ethan Allen Drive Mr. Belter stepped down from the Commission during this discussion. Mr. Roeder explained that the applicant will build a new road for this project. They will use city water and sewer, except lot 42 will always be on -site sewage and lots 22-28 will be on -site until the city sewer is extended with the new road. Each lot will have its own mailbox. Mrs. Lafleur noted that Mr. Belter prefers not to have side- walks because they are 2 miles from a bus stop and it would be hard to get a sidewalk plow there in winter. Mr. Belter noted the City is not putting in a sidewalk on Ethan Allen Drive which is being upgraded. Mr. Audette said this is due to lack of funds. Mrs. Maher said she would agree to a stip- ulation that as each lot develops, the cost for its sidewalk be put in the city sidewalk pool to be used where most needed in the City. Mr. Belter agreed reluctantly to this. Mr. Dickinson presented the traffic study. The intersection works fairly well except that left turns from Ethan Allen Dr. and Shamrock Rd. are at level "E". They anticipate 1,000 cars per peak hour with phase 3 development, but most of the traffic is not going to this development. The applicant pro- poses to add a right turn lane from Airport Parkway and a left turn lane from St. Michael's to Shamrock Rd/Ethan Allen Drive. They feel with this configuration a signal is not needed. A look at the capacity of the roadways showed that because of the lack of lateral clearances, this also operates PLANNING COMMISSION 25 AUGUST 1987 PAGE 5 at level "E". Mr. Dickinson said this is a high accident location and they propose adding additional warning beacons and signs. Mrs. Maher asked how long it will remain at level "E". Mr. Dickinson replied until widened or some other alternative roads exist.. Craig Leiner said he is not sure the trip generation method used was the best. He has other concerns that the rates are as much as half the ITE rates. Mrs. Lafleur suggested the Planning Commission not necessarily agree with the proposed improvements but that the City Engineer, Craig Leiner, and the applicant and his traffic consultant get together and come up with a list of improvements and associated costs. The developer would then pay a share of these improvements based on the traffic he is adding to the probelm. Mrs. Maher suggested the Commission review the project every few years to see what is happening. Mr. Sutton of Shamrock Rd. opposed the project on the grounds of the dangerous traffic situation. He said on weekends, Air Guard traffic is so heavy they can't get in or out of their driveway. At least 3 people hit the pole last winter, and there have been many other serious accidents. It is one of the most dangerous intersections in the city. He felt that concessions should not be made at the risk of people's lives. Mr. Audette said he needed to know what will happen soon so he knows what to do with Ethan Allen Road. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the final plat of John H. Belter,Jr, for a 21 lot industrial -com- mercial subdivision as depicted on a 10 page set of plans en- titled "Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase lots 22-42" prepared bv Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, dated February 1987, stamp dated August 5, 1987 with the following stipula- tions: 1. A landscaping bond for street trees in an amount deter- mined by the City Planner shall be posted prior to any con- struction. A suitable street tree shall be substituted for the Ash. All trees shall be at least 2-1/2 inch caliper, not 2 inch. 2. A bond shall be posted for streets prior to construction. The amount shall be determined by the City Engineer. 3. The following changes shall be made to the plan within 90 days: — — — a. Sewer manhole #9 shall have an 8: stub northerly b. All previously approved lots along the northern PLANNING COMMISSION 25 AUGUST 1987 PAGE 6' side of the new street shall have a sewer stub c. Additional drainage inlets to drain where grades are flat and to limit drainage to 300 feet for each set of inlets 4. An association of landowners to maintain off -site holding ponds and drainage ponds shall be formed. This will not be City responsibility. 5. The developer shall furnish the City with the name of the contractors doing the -street work, the architect and the en- gineer who will stake out and supervise the -work at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction. U on comple- tion of the work, the architect and/or engineer shall certify that the work is in conformance with the approved plan, stip- ulations and any other requirements and/or changes that the City requests. 6. The existing trees along Shamrock Road bordering lot #41 for a depth of 15 feet shall not be removed. 7. The private drive serving lots 39 and 40 shall be 24 feet wide within a 50 foot right of way- This shall be shown on the plans. 8. A sewer allocation of 6,000 gpd is made for the 20 lots. The $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. No construction can occur on lots 29 through 41 until capacity is available at the Airport Parkway Treatment Plant. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to see to it that lots 23-28 with on -site —sew —age —disposal hook into the sewer system when it is completed. Prior to approval on 29-41, the pump station shall be in. 9. A Plan detailing the location of gas, telephone, elec- tricity, TV cable and street lights shall be submitted for review and approval. 10. Water fittings shall be wrapped with polyethylene where concrete thrust blocks are used. 11. Trees shall be planted at least 5 feet from the water main. 12. Depth of topsoil replacement (4 inches) should be noted on typical detail on page 8. 13. The applicant shall be responsible for paying a share of the required improvements to the intersection or other solutions to traffic and safety problems based on the trips i 9�3J�d PLANNING COMMISSION 25 AUGUST 1987 PAGE 7 generated by these industrial lots. The total cost and scope of improvements shall be established 12y the City Engineer in consultation with the Street Supervisor, City Planner, and the Regional Planning Commission Traffic Engineer. The share or shall be established by the City Planner in consultation with ,17., 60 t the Regional Planning Traffic Engineer. 1 14. The developer shall have the option of contributing $15 per linear frontage foot toward the city sidewalk fund or building a sidewalk along his frontage on the unnamed new city street. 15. It is the applicant's responsibility to record the corrected final plat with the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void. They shall be approved the City Planner and signed by the Chairman or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. Mrs. Maher seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Following the vote, Mr. Belter resumed his seat on the Com- mission. 5. Site plan application of Orchard Lake Road Properties for construction of a 96,200 sq. ft. building for light manu- facturing on the 80 acre parcel south of Lane Press, 1020 Hinesburg Rd. Dick Trudell explained the development is on the former Semi - con property bounded by the Interstate and Hinesburg Rd. It was subdivided from the Lane Press property. An agreement exists between Semicon and Orchard Lake Properties for an easement. Peter Pollak, president of the company, said they manufacture high precision electrical equipment. It is a clean industry with no oils, no pcb's. They make their own electric current boards. 90% of their work is custom -build. They employ about 100 people now and plan to hire 75 new employees for this facility. These are mainly skilled jobs. Their ultimate aim is to locate the parent company here. The building will be south of Lane Press with access off the Lane Press road. the Sewer will connect through an easement to the pump station. The building will be completely sprink- lered. 160 parking spaces are provided. Mr. Trudell explained there will be a 3-foot berm around 1 side of the building with some screening from the Interstate. He said it is not their intention to hide the building but to AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: January 9, 2006 -January 19, 2006 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAMES AND ADDRESS: John & Joyce Belter 2 Country Club Drive So. Burlington VT 05403 GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER: 3-9010 Amended PERMIT NUMBER: 3870-9010 PREVIOUS PERMIT NUMBER: 1-0621 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington VT 05403 RECEIVING WATER: Unnamed tributary of the Winooski River EXPIRATION DATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE: August 5, 2010 DESCRIPTION: This is a draft authorization to discharge proposed for issuance to John & Joyce Belter and the City of South Burlington for the discharge of stormwater runoff from the Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision Phase III located in South Burlington,Vermont to unnamed tributaries of the Winooski River. The means of treatment include overland flow, vegetated swales and a detention basin. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application is on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records and may be obtained by calling 802-241-3770 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. J -2- PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed authorization to discharge are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) January 16, 2006, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Comments may also be faxed to 802-241-3287. The general permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. All comments received by the above date will be considered by DEC prior to issuance of an authorization to discharge under the general permit. FINAL ACTION/APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny an authorization to discharge under the general permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontjudiciary.or . The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660) Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation 1 nd ustr, mil. l,� State of Vermont�,.� 1�' 3 `'t t • LAND USE PERMIT CASE NO. 4C0643-3 APPLICANT John Belter, Jr. ADDRESS Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250) and Vermont State Environmental Protection Rules Chapter 3, Subdivisions Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0643-3 pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit applies to the lands identified in Book 148, Page 225 of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to John Belter, Jr., the "Permittee" as "grantee". This permit amendment specifically authorizes the Permittee to subdivide 6 lots (Lots22 through #2.8.and #42) of a proposed 21 lot subdivision and to construct 2300 feet of roads and utilities and the stormwater system. The subdivision is approved for on -site sewage disposal and municipal water and is located off of Ethan Allen Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. The Permittee, his assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, maintain and operate the project only as approved by the District Commission in accordance withh the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permits #4C0643 through #4C0643-2 remain in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. The project shall be completed as set forth in Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law #4C0643-3, in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Approved" and on file with the District Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the Districct Environmental Commission. 3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing juris- diction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit. Land Use Permit Amendment Page 2 #4C0643-3 4. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittee confirms and agrees for himself and all assigns and successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. 5. The 21 lot subdivision is approved for the following maximum cumulative impacts which may not be exceeded without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission: 315 parking spaces; 9450 gallons per day of wastewater and water; 1446 average daily vehicle trips; 149 average p.m. peak hour vehicle trips; and 1575 kVa of electricity. 6. Prior to the commencement of any construction on the 21 lots the Permittee, and any assigns or successors in interest, including any purchaser or tenant, shall file an amendment application as co -applicants which specifically addresses criteria l(Air), l(B), 1 (C) , 2, 4, 5, 7 (fire services) , 8, 9 (F) , 9 (J) and 9 (K) . 7. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Subdivision Permit EC-4-1183 issued on December 4, 1987 by the Regional Engineer, Division of Protection, Department of Environmental Conservation in compliance with the Vermont State Environmental Protection Rules. 8. During construction of the roads and utilities and on the 21 lots dust shall be controlled as needed through applications of water until all disturbed areas are fully stabilized. 9. Prior to commencement of construction the Permittee shall file a Discharge Permit from the Agency of Natural Resources. The Permittee, and all assigns and successors interest shall conform to all of the terms and conditions of this discharge permit. 10. All stumps and construction debris associated with the construction of the roads and utilities and the development of the 21 lots shall be disposed of at the South Burlington landfill. 11. The Permittee, and any assigns and successors in interest including any purchaser or tenant, shall install and maintain water conserving plumbing fixtures in any building constructed on the 21 lots including but not limited to low -flush toilets, low - flow showerheads, and aerator -type or flow -restricted faucets. All deeds for these lots shall require the installation and maintenance of the same. Land Use Permit Amendment Page 3 #4C0643-3 12. No construction, earth disturbance or storage is permitted on lots #35, #36, #37 and #41 below the 219 foot elevation. 13. Prior to the commencement of any construction the Permittee shall file a revised erosion control plan which provides erosion control below the stormwater outfall, at the road intersections, and specifies seeding and mulching immediately after reaching final grade and shall receive the approval of the Commission. The Permittee shall comply with Exhibits #5, #17 and #31 for erosion control during construction of the roads and utilities. No sediment may be transported beyond that area necessary for construction. Erosion controls shall at least comply with the Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites. From October lst to April 15th of any calendar year, all non -vegetated disturbed areas of the construction site shall be mulched until final vegetative cover is established. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as they deem necessary. 14. In addition to conformance with the requirements of condition #13, the Permittee shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste materials into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittee from compliance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 15. Prior to the occupancy of any buildong on any of the 21 lots the Permittee shall certify to the District Environmenntal Commission that the following improvements have been completed: a) a southbound left turn lane at Shamrock Road; b) a northbound right turn lane at Ethan Allen Drive; c) the widening to 3 lanes the Ethan Allen approach; d) the removal of the creat on the Shamrock Road approach; and e) the installation of hazard identification beacons on each Airport Parkway approach to this intersection. 16. No exterior lighting may be installed without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 17. Prior to the commencement of any construction the Permittee shall file a revised landscaping plan which includes appropriate ever- green landscaping in the area near Shamrock Road and shall receive the approval of the District Environmental Commission. Land Use Permit Amendment Page 4 #4C0643-3 18. All amendment applications for development of the 21 lots shall specify downshielded lighting fixtures and roofs of dark colors. 19. The removal of topsoil is specifically prohibited until the Permittee files an amendment application for a topsoil removal and reclamation plan and the District Environmental Commission issues a permit amendment. 20. All deeds for the 21 lots shall require that all heated structures shall be constructed with insulation with an R-Value of at least R-19 in the exterior walls, R-38 in the roof or cap, R-10 around the perimeter of the foundation and double -glazed windows. 21. The following shall apply to all lots which contain the Vermont Electric Power Company and Green Mountain Power Company easements: a) the sewage replacement area on Lot #39 be at least 25 feet from the parallel to the centerline of the easement; b) no stockpiling (including snow) shall occur in the easements without the written consent of the utilities; c) vegetation within the easements be limited to species with a mature height of 15 feet; d) all outdoor lighting fixtures in the easements shall be no higher than 12 feet; e) access to the easements be maintained; and f) all grade changes within the easement must be approved by the utilities. 22. All amendment applications for development on lots which contain the easement must contain a letter of approval from Vermont Electric Power Company and Green Mountain Power Company. 23. This permit shall expire on February 20, 2011 unless extended by the District Commission. Notwithstanding the latter date, this permit shall expire one year from the date of issuance if the Permittee has not demonstrated an intention to proceed with the project. In any event, substantial construction must occur within two years of the issuance date. 24. Failure to comply with any of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Section 6090(b). Land Use Permit Amendment Page 5 #4C0643-3 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of }ebllotltij 1988. J (,p vu-(Ir 'W" Katherine M. Vose Acting District #4 Coordinator KMV/ECA/aml By, Evan C. Archer, Chairman District #4 Commis on Commissioner partic'pating in this decision: Louise Wright STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION #4 RE: John Belter, Jr. Application #4C0643-3 Ethan Allen Drive Findings of Fact and South Burlington, Vermont Conclusions of Law 05403 and Order 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250) I. INTRODUCTION On August 11, 1987 an amendment application was filed by John Belter of Ethan Allen Drive, South Burlington, Vermont for Phase III of a previously approved subdivision ; the subdivision of 21 (lots #22 through #42) commercial lots and the construction of 2300 feet of road and utilities. The subdivision is to be served by municipal water and both municipal and on -site septic systems and is located off of Ethan Allen Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. The tract of land involved in the original subdivision consisted of 345 +/- acres. The tract of land involved in this Phase III, 21 lot subdivision consists of 38 acres. The Applicant's legal interest is ownership in fee simple described in a deed recorded on May 9, 1979. Under Act 250, projects are reviewed based on the 10 criteria of 10 V.S.A., Section 6086(a) 1-10. Before granting a permit, the District Commission must find that the project complies with these criteria and is not detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. Decisions must be stated in the form of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The facts we have relied upon are contained in the documents on file identified as Exhibits #1 - #44 , and the evidence received at a hearing held on September 8, 1987. This hearing was recessed pending the submission of additional information and deliberation by the Commission. A site visit was conducted on September 8, 1987. Parties to this application who attended the hearing are: The Applicant by John Belter, Lance Llewellyn, Roger Dickinson and James Roeder; and The Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission by Craig .Leiner. The Entry of Appearance and Pre -Hearing Comments by Fred Emigh, Land Use Attorney for the Agency of Natural Resources were entered into the record. Findings of Fact #4C0643-3 Page 2 II. BACKGROUND On February 13, 1986 the District Commission issued Land Use Permit #4C0643 approving the subdivision of 13 lots from the 345 +/- acre Belter Farm. This 13 lot subdivision involved 15.6 acres of land on the southwestern portion of the farm. The balance of the farm, the majority of which is located in the floodplain of the Winooski River, continues to be operated as a farm. This proposed 21 lot subdivision involves 38 acres which are adjacent to the previously approved subdivision. The previously approved 13 lot subdivision is subject to an "umbrella permit" in which maximum cumulative impacts have been approved for these 13 lots. The impacts associated with this 21 lot subdivision were not accounted for in the 13 lot subdivision and are, therefore, evaluated in these Findings. III. FINDINGS OF FACT In making the following findings, the Commission has summarized the statutory language of the 10 Criteria of 10 V.S.A., Section 6086 (a) : SECTION 6086(a)(1) WATER AND AIR POLLUTION: The Commission finds that this undue air and water pollution. supported by the findings note criterion. SECTION 6086(a)(1)AIR POLLUTION: subdivision will not result in This finding depends on and is 9 under the subsections of this The Commission finds that this subdivision will not result in undue air pollution. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 1. This 21 lot subdivision will involve the installation of 315 parking spaces (Exhibit #5). 260 parking spaces are approved for installation under Land Use Permit #4C0643. Therefore, a total of 575 contiguous parking spaces are to be installed by the Applicant which is below the threshold number of 1,000 parking spaces which the Agency of Natural Resources has determined will result in non -point source air pollution. Findings of Fact Page 3 #4C0643-3 2. The buildings to be constructed on these 21 lots will be heated with oil, gas or wood heating systems (Exhibit #5) which will not result in air pollution. 3. The uses permitted within this subdivision are not expected to generate process emissions, noxious odors, or unreasonable noise. Amendment applications for construction on these lots will address air pollution (Exhibit #5). 4. During construction dust will be controlled through applications of water and, upon completion, through paving and permanent vegetation (Exhibit #5). The Commission finds that this subdivision will not result in undue air pollution because sources of air pollution will be controlled and because sources of air pollution associated with individual uses will be reviewed in the amendment application process. The Commission will require that all dust be controled and will limit the cumulative number of parking spaces to 575. SECTION 6086(a)(1)(A) HEADWATERS: The Commission finds that this subdivision is not in a headwaters area as defined by the statute because the site is within the Winooski River Basin and is not charaterized by steep slopes and shallow soils (Exhibits #5 and #13). SECTION 6086(a)(1)(B) WASTE DISPOSAL: The Commission finds that this subdivision will meet applicable Division of Protection Regulations and will not result in the injection of waste materials or harmful or toxic substances into groundwater or wells. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 5. This subdivision will generate 9450 gallons per day of sanitary wastewater (450 gallons per day per lot) (Exhibit # 42) . Lots # 22 through # 28 and # 42 (8 lots) are to be served by individual on -site absorption trench type wastewater disposal systems. The wastewater from all other lots (6300 gallons per day) will be disposed of through connection to the South Burlington Airport Parkway Waste- water Treatment Plant (Exhibit #5). This plan has recently been expanded and the South Burlington City Manager has stated that 3,300 gallons per day of wastewater can be accepted for treatment at this plant (Exhibit #40). Sub- division Permit EC-4-1183 has been issued by the Regional Engineer, Agency of Natural Resources approving the subdivision of Lots #22 through #28 and #42 and requires Findings of Fact Page 4 #4C0643-3 that a public building permit be issued prior to the commencement of any construction on these lots. Lots #29 through #41 are not approved for subdivision (Exhibit #42). The Commission accepts this Subdivision Permit as evidence that the disposal of wastes on Lots #22 through #28 and #48 meets the applicable Environmental Protection Rules for on - site subsurface disposal and will not result in the injection of waste materials or harmful substances into groundwater or wells. 6. The stormwater system has been designed to account for stormwater from the road and the lots and has assumed a 70% lot coverage will be directed to catchbasins and conveyed to a sedimentation/detention basin which will treat the storm - water and maintain the discharge at pre -development rates (Exhibit #5). A discharge permit has not been issued. 7. Any stumps and all construction debris will be disposed of at the South Burlington landfill (Exhibit #5). 8. Any storage or disposal of hazardous materials will be addressed through amendment applications (Exhibit #5). The Commission finds that the disposal of sanitary wastes for Lots #22 through #28 and #42 will not result in undue water pollution and will require conformance to the Subdivision Permit. The Commission will not approved the subdivision of Lots #1 through #11 until a subdivision permit is issued by the Agency of Natural Resources. The Commission will require the filing of a discharge permit prior to commencement of construction. All amendment applications for development on these lots must address sewage requirements, conformance with the discharge permit and conformance with Findings #7 and #8. The Commission will limit the cumulative amount of generated wastewater to 9450 gallons per day. SECTION 6086(a)(1)(C) WATER CONSERVATION: The Commission finds that this subdivision will utilize the best available technology for water conserving for commercial and industrial subdivisions. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 9. All deed covenants will require the installation of low flow plumbing fixtures (Exhibit #5). Findings of Fact Page 5 #4C0643-3 The Commission will require both the installation and continued maintenance of these fixtures in a permit condition and will require any lot purchaser or tenant to file an amendment application which specifically addresses the installation and maintenance of these fixtures and receive the approval of the Commission. SECTION 6086(a)(1)(D) FLOODWAYS: The Commission finds that the development of this subdivision will not restrict or divert the flow of floodwaters or significantly increase the peak discharge into the stream or Winooski River within or downstream from the development and will not endanger the public health, safety or general welfare of the public or riparian owners during flooding. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 10. The property to be subdivided is not located within the floodplain of the nearby Winooski River (Exhibits #5 and #17, and Findings of Fact #4C0643). 11. An unnamed tributary of the Winooski River traverses this property on the west side of Lots #35 and #37. The 100 year flood elevation near the center of the site is approximately 218 feet. The only construction within the floodway elevation will be the wastewater pumping station and the stormwater detention and sedimentation pond which will not restrict flows (Exhibits #5 and #17). The Commission will proihibit any other construction, earth disturbance or storage of materials below the 219 foot elevation without the prior written approval of the Commission. SECTION 6086(a) (1) (E) STREAMS: The Commission finds that the development of this subdivision has been designed to maintain the natural condition of this stream and will not endanger the health, safety or welfare of the public or adjoining landowners. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 11. An unnamed tributary of the Winooski River traverses this property on the west side of Lots #35 through #37. No construction will be located closer than 75 feet from this stream exceAt for the storm drain outfall which will be stabilized with rip -rap upon completion (Exhibits #5, #17 and #22) . Findinqs of Fact Paqe 6 #4C0643-3 SECTION 6086(a) (1) (F) SHORELINES: The Commission finds that this subdivision will not be located on anv shoreline (Exhibit #5 and Findinqs of Fact #4C0643). SECTION 6086(a)(2 & 3) WATER AVAILABILITY AND IMPACT ON EXISTING SUPPLY: The Commission finds that there is sufficient water available to meet the needs of this subdivision and that this subdivision will not place an unreasonable burden on an existing supply. This finding der)ends on and is supported by the following: 12. This subdivision will require 9450 gallons per day of water (Exhibit #5). The has stated that there is sufficient water available and that the subdivision will not restrict nor encumber present users. The Commission will limit the cumulative water demand to 9450 qallons per day. SECTION 6086 (a) (4) SOIL EROSION AND THE CAPACITY OF THE LAND TO HOLD WATER: The Commission finds that it must require additional measures reqardinq soil erosion by condition to insure that undue erosion will not result and that the land area to be covered by pavement and buildings will not increase runoff significantly. This findinq depends on and is supported by the following: 13. The site is relatively flat and the soils are poorly drained silty sands and fine sandy loams in the Aqawam, Winooski and Limerick soil series (Exhibit #5). 14. Temporary and permanent erosion controls are depicted on Exhibit # 17 and are detailed and sequenced on Exhibit # 33. Temporary erosion controls will consist of silt fences or hay bale dikes. The sedimentation basin which will serve as a temporary erosion control will function as a permanent stormwater detention basin. All disturbed areas will be stabilized with pavement or vegetation after construction. All storm drain outfalls will be protected with rip -rap and stone linina will be placed in all swales where the slope exceeds 50 (Exhibits #5 and #33). Findinqs of Fact Paqe 7 #4C0643-3 15. Erosion controls to be employed during the development of individual lots will be reviewed through amendment applications (Exhibit #5). The Commission will require that the Applicant implement these controls and that these controls conform to the Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites. Additionally, the Commission will require that the Applicant file a revised plan (Exhibit #17) which provides erosion controls below the stormwater outfall, at the intersections of the new road with Ethan Allen Drive (such as stabilized construction entrance) and seed and mulch all disturbed areas immediately after reaching final grade. SECTION 6086(a)(5) TRANSPORTATION: The Commission finds that this subdivision will not cause unreasonable conqestion or unsafe conditions with respect to transportation. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 16. In Findings of Fact #4C0643 the Commission found that the 13 lot subdivision and existing industrial development siqnificantiv increased the traffic on Airport Parkway. The Commission noted safety concerns and the need for improvements to Lime Kiln Bridge. Therefore, the Commission retained the right to require roadway improvements. 17. The sight distances at the intersections of the new road with Ethan Allen Drive are sufficient for the posted and actua vehicle speeds (Exhibit #30 and testimony of C. Leirner) . 18. This 21 lot subdivision will generate an estimated 1446 average weekday vehicle trips of which 139 trips will occur in the a.m. peak hour and 149 trips will occur in the p.m. peak hour. All of this traffic will utilize the Airport Parkway and Ethan Allen Drive intersection. 19. The intersection of Airport Parkway, Ethan Allen Drive and Shamrock Road is operating close to capacity and this subdivision will increase the amount of congestion. This intersection is a high accident location and subdivision traffic will exacerbate traffic safety problems but will not lower the levels of services (Exhibit #30). Hazard identi- fication beacons should be installed on each of the Airport Parkway approaches to this intersection. The development of this subdivision will warrant the construction of a southbound left turn lane at Shamrock Road, a northbound Findinqs of Fact Paqe 8 #4C0643-3 right turn lane at Ethan Allen Drive, the widening of the Ethan Allen Drive approach to three lanes, and the removal of the crest on Shamrock Road approach (Exhibits #30 and #32) . 20. 350 of the sudivision traffic will travel over the Lime Kiln Bridge. The bridqe is presently operating close to capacity and is considered to be inadequate. The Agency of Transportation is performing a preliminary engineering study reqardinq the replacement of this bridge (Exhibit #30). The estimated cost to the City of reconstructing the bridge is $140,000 (Exhibit #34). 21. The City may relocate Airport Parkway and Lime Kiln Bridge to the west, correcting the current safety problems. The estimated cost of this relocation is $1,400,000 (Exhibit #34) . 22. The South Burlinqton Planning Commission has required that the Applicant contribute to the cost of the required intersection improvements and bridge improvements at a rate of $880 per lot (Exhibit #34). The Commission finds that the financial payment required by the Citv will sufficiently mitigate the impact of the traffic from this project on the Lime Kiln Bridge. The Commission will require that the required intersection improvements are installed prior to occupancy of any lot. Additionally, the Commission will limit this subdivision to a maximum vehicle trip generation and will require each amendment application to specify its estimated traffic. SECTION 6086(a) (6 and 7) EDUCATIONAL AND MUNICIPAL SERVICES: The Commission finds that this subdivision will not place an unreasonable burden on the ability of the municipality to provide educational, municipal or governmental services. This findinq depends on and is supported by the following: 23. This subdivision will not directly require educational services. 24. Municipal water, sewer, police and fire services can be provided to this subdivision (Exhibits #40, #15, #37 and The Commission will require that amendment applications for the development of individual lots be accompanied by evidence that the Fire Department can provide service to the particular buildinq and lavout. Findinqs of Fact Paqe 9 #4C0643-3 SECTION 6086(a)(8) AESTHETICS, SCENIC BEAUTY, HISTORIC SITES AND NATURAL AREAS: The Commission finds that the subdivision will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites, or rare and irreplaceable natural areas. This findinq depends on and is supported by the followinq: 25. On its site visit the Commission observed that the subdivision property is in a residential and growing industrial and commercial area. Airport Parkway provides vistas of the Applicant's Farm and the Winooski River Valley. The existing buildings do not obstruct these views because thev, and the property to be subdivided are located at an elevation lower than Airport Parkway. The subdivision property is very visible from adjoining Shamrock Road. 26. Only the roads and utilities are to be constructed under this application and no permanent project sign will be installed (Exhibit #5). 27. No exterior street lighting will be installed and all utilities will be installed unnderground (Exhibits #5 and #17) . 28. Deciduous street trees will be planted at 60 foot intervals along both sides of the new roadway. The City will maintain these trees after the street is accepted (Exhibits #5 and #17) . 29. The aesthetics of individual lots (landscaping, building construction and materials, signage and trash storage) will be addressed in amendment applications (Exhibit #5). 30. This subdivision will not adversely impact any wildlife habitat or historic sites (Exhibits #5, #12 and #14). The Commission finds that the existing buildings do not obstruct the vistas thev call attention to themselves, appearing scattered and out of character with the area. The planting of street trees will offer some unity to the 21 lot subdivision. To reduce the impact of this subdivision, the Commission will require that the Applicants revise the landscaping plan to include appropriate evergreen plantings in the area near Shamrock Road and will require that the roofs be finished in dark colors. The Commission will require that all exterior liqhtinq throughout this subdivision be downshielded and that amendment applications address the aesthetics associated with individual lot development. Findings of Fact Paqe 10 #4C0643-3 SECTION 6086(a)(9) CONFORMANCE WITH THE CAPABILITY AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The Commission finds that this subdivision conforms to the capacility and development plan. This finding depends on and is supported by the findings noted under the subsections of this criterion. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(A) IMPACT OF GROWTH: The Commission finds that the municipality will be able to accommodate the total growth and rate of growth that will result from this subdivision. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 31. When developed this subdivision will contribute an estimated $150,000 a year in tax revenue to the City which will outweight the costs of municipal water, sewer, road, police and fire services (Exhibit #5). The Applicant will contribute to the costs of road improvements (these Findings under criterion 5). SECTION 6086(a)(9)(B) PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS: The Commission finds that this subdivision will not result in a siqnificant reduction to the agricultural potential of the primary aqricultural soils. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 32. In the original application the Applicant presented a "Master Plan" which indicated that area of the farm to remain in agricultural use (237.1 acres) and that area of the farm to be developed at some time (91.5 acres). This 21 lot subdivision is located in the area planned for development and in the area which contributes the least to the agricultural production (Findings of Fact #4C0643, #25, Exhibits #5 and #36). SECTION 6086(a)(9)(C) FOREST AND SECONDARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS: The Commission finds that the subdivision site does not contain forest or secondary agricultural soils because the majority of the site contains primary agricultural soils. Those areas which do not contain primary agricultural soils contain slopes which preclude their contribution to an economic agricultural operation and are not of a size capable of supporting or contributing to an economic operation. Findinqs of Fact Paqe 11 #4C0643-3 SECTION 6086(a)(9)(D and E) EARTH RESOURCES AND EXTRACTION OF EARTH RESOURCES: The Commission cannot find that the proposed removal of topsoil will not have an unduly harmful impact upon the environmental or surroundinq land uses and development and that, after removal, the site will be suitable for the proposed subdivision. This findinq depends on and is supported by the following: 33. The subdivision property contains 12" to 15" of topsoil. The Applicant will remove topsoil from the property, and within the utility line easement, leaving 2" to 4" and will stockpile the topsoil on the site prior to sale (testimony of J. Belter, J. Roeder and L. Llewellyn). The Commission finds that the Applicant has not submitted sufficient information and a minimum of 4" of topsoil should remain to support vegetation. Therefore, the Commission will not permit the removal of topsoil until the Applicants file a plan depicting the area(s) from which topsoil will be removed, the phases in which it will be removed, specifying the minimum topsoil to remain, the stockpile areas and erosion controls, the timinq of the removal and a reseeding schedule. This information must be submitted as an amendment application. .qECTION 6086(a)(9)(F) ENERGY CONSERVATION: The Commission finds that this subdivision, as conditioned, reflects the principles of energy conservation and incorporates the best available technology for the efficient use or recovery of energy. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 33. Energy conservation measures to be employed in buildings constructed on these lots will be reviewed through the amendment application process (Exhibit #5). The Commission will require that the Applicant require, by deed covenant, minimum insulation standards of R-38 in the roofs, R- 19 in the exterior walls, R-10 around the perimeter of the foundations and double -glazed windows. The Commission will specifically prohibit the installation of electric resistance heating systems because they are generally known to be energy inefficient. The Commission will require that each amendment application specifically address energy conservation measures to be employed. Findinqs of Fact Paqe 12 #4C0643-3 SECTION 6086(a)(9)(G) PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES: The Commission finds that the only private utility involved with this subdivision is the stormwater system and finds that adequate surety is provided to the City through the Planning Commission's requirement that a landowners association be formed to maintain the pond (Exhibit #39). SECTION 6086(a)(9)(H) COSTS OF SCATTERED DEVELOPMENT: The Commission finds that this subdivision is contiguous to existinq industrial land use. SECTION 6086(a) (9) (J) PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES The Commission finds that utility service is available to this subdivision, that an excessive or uneconomic demand will not be placed on such facilities or services, and that the provision of such services has been planned on the basis of a projection of reasonable population increase and economic growth. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 34. Green Mountain Power Corporation has stated that 75 KVa per lot can be supplied to this subdivision (Exhibit #9). The Commission will limit this subdivision to a maximum total useage of 1575 KVa and will require each amendment application to address the specific energy requirements of each lot. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(K) DEVELOPMENT AFFECTING PUBLIC INVESTMENTS: The Commission finds that this subdivision will not unnecessarily endanger the public investment or materially interfere with the function and public use of adjoining public investments in the road or utility easement. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 35. The Applicant's road improvements and financial contribution are adequate to mitigate the impact that this project will have on the affected roadways (these Findings under Criterion 5). 36. Vermont Electric Power Company and Green Mountain Power Company hold easements which cross the area to be subdivided (Exhibit #17). VELCO and Green Mountain Power have concerns with the subdivision which include: Findinqs of Fact Paqe 13 #4C0643-3 a) that the sewage disposal replacement area for Lot #39 be at least 25' from and parallel to the centerline of the easement; b) that no stockpiling (including snow) occur in the ease- ment unless written consent is granted; c) that vegetation within the easement be limited to species with a mature height of 15 feet; d) that outdoor lighting fixtures within the easement be no hiqher than 12 feet and not interfere with access to the lines; e) that access to the easement be maintained; and f) that any grade changes within the easement be approved. Gree Mountain Power has stated that their concerns have been addreess (Exhibits #8 - #11). The Commission will incorporate these concerns into a permit condition and will require that all amendment applications for the development of lots be accompanied by a letter of approval from Vermont Electric Power Company and Green Mountain Power Company. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(L) RURAL GROWTH AREAS: The Commission finds that this subdivision is not located in a rural qrowth area as defined by the statute. SECTION 6086(a)(10) CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLAN: The Commission finds that this subdivision conforms to the local plan as evidenced by The Commission finds that this subdivision will not have a regional impact because it is relatively small and will not affect any regional resources. IV. CONCLUSION OF LAW Based upon the foregoinq Findings of Fact, it is the conclusion of this District Environmental Commission that the project described in the application referred to above, if completed and maintained in conformance with all of the terms and conditions of that application, and of Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0643-3 will not cause or result in a detriment to public health, safety or general welfare under the criteria described in 10 V.S.A., Section 6086(a). Findinqs of Fact Paqe 14 #4C0643-3 V . ORDER Based upon the foreqoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0643-3 is hereby issued. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this �I�k day of 't�Y(dp!f`�i� 1988. B C Y Evan C. Arcl-er, alrmaf� District #4 Commis on _ Commissioner participating in Katherine M. Vose this decision: Acting District #4 Coordinator Louise Wright KMV/ECA/aml EXH113I,r LIST FOR AT )ICA'rloN # 4CO643-3 L_ E X H I B I T •ON D R A E T C E E I V E D E N T E R E D A = APPLICANT T = TOWN TPC = TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION RPC = Regional Planning Commission AEC = Agency of Environmental Conservation NATURE OF EXHIBIT Date Entered 1 8-5-87 A master land use application - - 2 notice - comm. of cons. req. permit (7-31-87) 3 " certification of service form (8-5-87) 4 " " location map 5 Act 250 - 10 criteria information 6 " " abutting property owners list 7 " " site map 8 letter - re: Green Mt. Power from C. Miller (7-28-87) 9 letter - re: Green Mt. Power from E. Shlatz (7-22-87) 10 letter - re: Green Mt. Power from R. Gamelin(7-24-87) 11 letter - re: Vt. Electric Power Co. from C. Beard (7-9-87' 12 letter - re: Dept. of Fish and Wildlife by T. Myers (7-8-87) 13 letter - re: Dept. of Env. Cons. from Dennis Nealon (7-13-87) 14 letter - re: Dev. and Comm. Affairs from E. Gilbertson (7-22-87) 15 " " letter - re: So. Burlington Police Dept. from J. Race (7-8-87) 16 letter - re: City of So. Burlington Water Dept. from S. Messina (7-10-87) 17 " " plan - Overall Site Plan by Fitzpatrick & Llewellyn Sheet 1 of 9 (2-87) 18 " " plan - Site and Utilities Plan by same, Sheet 2 of 9 (6-87) 19 " plan - Roadway Plan and Profile by same, Sheet 3 of 9 3-87) 20 " " plan - same as above by same, Sheet 4 of 9 (3-87) 21 plan - Pump Station and Details by same, Sheet 5 of 9(5-87) 22 plan - Miscellaneous Details by same, Sheet 6 of 9 (3-87) 23 plan - Typical Details/Site Facilities, by same, Sheet 7 of 9 (3-87) 24 " " plan - same as above, by same, Sheet 8 of 9 (3-87) 25 i� plan - same as above, by same, Sheet 9 of 9 (3-87) 26 plan - Landscape Plan by same, Sheet 1 of 1 (7-87) 27 8-31-87 GMP letter - request for party status and concerns; by C. Miller, GMP (8-28-87) 271 It if letter - subdivision concerns by C. Miller, GMP (7-28-87) 28 9-4-87 ANR Entry of Appearance and Pre -Hearing Comments by F. Emigh, Land Use Attorney (9-2-87) 29 9-10-87 A diagrams - turning movement diagrams, "1992 DHV" (undated) (2 sheets) EXHIBIT LIST FOR AP- ')ICATION # 4CO643-3 Page E X H I B I T N 0. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 D R A E T C E E I V E D E N T E R E D IB Y 9-10-87 A /t ?t 9-28-87 12-4-87 1-4-88 1-14-88 it C ANR ff DOH C A = APPLICANT T = TOWN TPC = TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION RPC = Regional Planning Commission AEC = Agency of Environmental Conservation NATURE OF EXHIBIT Date Entered letter - traitic. report; by R. Dickinson, Fitzpatrick - Llewellyn (8-10-87) plan - Landscape Plan by same (1 of 1) (7-87) diagram - Sketch of Proposed Roadway Improvements (unsigned, undated) diagram - possible relocation of Airport Parkway on a South Burlington tax map letter - re: traffic improvements; by J. Lafleur South Burlington City Planner (9-3-87) document - minutes of 8-10-87 South Burlington Planning Commission minutes letter - re: agricultural soils by A. Jestes, Agricultural Land Use Planner, Dept. of Agriculture (9-1-87) memo - re: fire service; by Chief Goddette, South Burlington Fire Dept. (9-10-87) letter - re: no adverse comments; by A. Hull for Vermont Agency of Transportation (8-26-87) document - minutes of 8-24-87 South Burlington Planning Commission meeting letter - re: sewage treatment plant capacity by W. Szymanski, South Burlington City Manager permit - Subdivision Permit EC-4-1183; by E. Christianson, (12-4-87) Draft Discharge Permit by G. Schultz (12-21-87) letter of approval by H. Sargent (10-6-87) letter re: water system by S. Messina, Water Dept. (9-15-87) State of Vermont iTIIIDivision Permit LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. EC-4-1183 Chapter 3, Subdivisions APPLICANT John and Joyce Belter Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal ADDRESS 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ACT 250 APPROVAL UNDER CASE NUMBER 4CO643-3. This project, consisting of 6 lots, identified as Lots 22 through 28 and Lot 42, of a proposed 21 lot subdivision, located off Ethan Allen Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This Permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to construction. (2) The subdivision must be completed as shown on the Plans Project Number 87018 Sheet 1 of 9 "Overall Site Plan" dated February 1987 last revised September 1987 and Sheet 6 of 9 "Miscellaneous Details" dated March 1987 prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. and which have been stamped APPROVED by the Division of Protection. No changes shall be made to the approved plan without prior written approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. (3) A copy of the approved plans and the Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (4) Each prospective purchaser of any lot of the subdivision shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan, the engineer's site report, and the Permit prior to conveyance. (5) Lots 22 through 28 and Lot 42 are proposed for future commercial development with an anticipated sewage flow from each lot of 450 gallons per day. (6) Lots 29 through 41 as shown on the stamped approved plans are not approved for any type structure, the occupancy of which would require the installation of interior plumbing, water supply or the disposal of wastewater. Approval will not be granted until an amended application has been submitted to the Agency of Natural Resources showing that each lot can properly dispose of wastewater either by soil absorption or by connection to a municipal wastewater treatment facility. WATER SUPPLY (7) The lot is approved for connection to a municipal type water system approved by the Department of Health provided that all construction is in accordance with the approved plans and the Environmental Protection Rules, Effective September 10, 1982. (8) The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Department of Health's "Letter of Approval" to John Belter dated October 6, 1987. Subdivision Permit EC-4-1183 Page 2 SEWAGE DISPOSAL (9) Each sewage disposal system shall be constructed as shown on the APPROVED plan and shall be operated at all times in a manner that will not permit discharge of effluent onto the surface of the ground or into the waters of the State. No construction (buildings, roads, water lines, etc.) that might interfere with the installation or operation of the sewage disposal field or its replacement area is permitted. All isolation distances as set forth in Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 8, Section 8-08, and Chapter 7, Appendix 7-D, shall be adhered to. (10) Each sewage disposal field shall be constructed such that the bottom of the system shall be no deeper than 6 inches below the existing ground. (11) The installation of each sewage disposal system shall be inspected by a professional engineer registered in the State of Vermont who shall report in writing prior to use, that the work has been done in accordance with the approved plans and the permit. (.12) This permit shall in no way relieve you of the obligations of Title 10, Chapter 48, Subchapter 4, for the protection of groundwater. PLUMBING (13) Prior to construction of any structure on each lot, an amendment public building application is to be submitted to and written approval granted by the Agency of Natural Resources. The amendment is to include, but not limited to, 2 sets of the final site plan identifying building location and dimensions, location of the septic tank and sewage disposal systems (approved by this permit), water lines from the municipal water main to the building and all roadways, parking areas etc. Additionally, one set of interior plumbing plans are to be provided the Agency to ensure that the exterior sewer and water lines shown on the site plan coincide with the sewer and water pipes exiting the building. Subdivision Permit EC-4-1183 Page 3 (14) The applicant is hereby notified that all interior waste and water distribution plans must now be reviewed and approved by the Department of Labor and Industry prior to construction. This shall hold true for new buildings containing interior plumbing and for existing buildings where the interior plumbing is to be altered, replaced, or added to. You may contact the Department of Labor and Industry by telephoning 802-828-2106 or by writing to: Department of Labor and Industry, State Office Building, Montpelier, Vermont, 05602. Dated in the Village of Essex Junction, Vermont this 4th day of December, 1987. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION i Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer cc: Donald Robisky City of South Burlington Geoffrey W. Green Dept. of Health Dept. of Labor and Industry FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc. State of Vermont. Y rlic Building Permit CASE NO. PB-4-1202 APPLICANT John Belter ADDRESS Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05401 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES Chapter 4, Public Buildings Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal Chapter 8, Water Supply This project, consisting of construction of a 6,256 square foot building on Lot #3 of the Belter Subdivision (approved in Land Use Permit EC-4-0772) with municipal water supply and on -site sewage disposal, located at 6 Lime Rock Road, in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Sheet 1 "J-Care Supplies Inc., Lot 3 - Ethan Allen Farm, Site Plan" dated August 1986 prepared by FitzPatrick- Llewellyn, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by ,the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. WATER SUPPLY (3) The project is approved for water supply by construction and utilization of the municipal water service depicted on the approved plans. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection. SEWAGE DISPOSAL (4) The project is approved for wastewater disposal by construction and utilization of the site -specific wastewater disposal system depicted on the approved plans. No other method or location of wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection. (5) No buildings, roads, water lines, or other construction that might interfere with the installation or operation of the sewage disposal field is permitted on or near the site - specific wastewater disposal system or replacementarea depicted on the approved plans. All isolation distances as set forth in Chapter 7, of the Environmental Protection Rules. If at any time this system fails to function properly and/or creates a health hazard, the Division of Protection is to be immediately notified. (6) The future wastewater disposal "replacement area" designated on the approved plans shall be held in reserve for the eventual construction of a replacement disposal system in the event of failure of the primary system. No construction, earthwork, or other activity shall be allowed within the replacement area which would diminish its natural suitability for such eventual use as a wastewater disposal site. John Belter PB-4-1202 / Page 2 / PLUMBING ' (7) This permit authorizes construction of the exterior sewer and water services conditioned above and for the construction of each building provided the individual water and sewer services to each building remains as shown on the stamped approved plans. Alterations to the exterior sewer or water services shall be approved by the Division of Protection prior to installation. (8) Prior to commencement of construction of the building(s), the applicant must submit to the Division one set of interior plumbing floor plans which match the exterior water and sewer services. Patrick A. Parenteau, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By 7 1� Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 9th day of January, 1989. cc: Donald Robisky Town Planning Commission Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. Jeff & Betty Goldberg FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INC( ,DRATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 LLLE U TIELiu)w ��Li�1UV�IJVLJ� U �Liz1L5 DATE ! - 1 Z , 1Ug JOB NO. ^ �O�I(J ATTENTION Joe RE: �uLOAkVl,✓('C' l WE ARE SENDING YOU X Attached ❑ Under separate cover via &.0-1 t the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order a ✓etAlo t COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Zo55 Dv--era-l.Q G✓ct. (26-v _ Cvevt,�-ed. 4- 4,u,,--a+- kelgs THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS V' COPY TO, SIGNED: G -Ir-i� PRODUCT 240-2 Ees Inc.. Groton. M- 0147I If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ,IEMORANDUM 'South Burlington August 21, 1987 Planning Commission 3) MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, 811 WILLISTON ROAD This application was reviewed for the first time on August 11th. The Planning Commission continued the application because the meeting was running too late. Access: The major issue was access off Williston Road and the number of curb cuts that the Planning Commission would allow. The majority of the Planning Commission opted for one curb cut. Craig Leiner, the City's Transportation Engineer from the Chit- tenden County Regional Planning Commission will be present at the meeting to discuss access management for this section of Williston Road. See enclosed sketch. The applicants presented their case for why they need two curb cuts off Williston Road. They claimed that the new proposed Mobil Station was redesigned with two curb cuts in mind (as dictated by the AOT) and one curb cut would not work if they remained with this same design. Traffic: A traffic study was performed by David Spitz. He will explain the study in detail at the meeting. In summary, the study states that the use will not generate new traffic. The traffic using the gas station already exists on Williston Road. (As you know, we have not accepted this argument in the past since it is turning movements and delays that increase traffic problems.) They also claim that new, more efficient layout of the Mobil facilities will reduce congestion in that area. 4) BELTER �ETHAN ALLEN FARMS, 21 IOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION, LLEN DRIVE At preliminary plat approval on July 28, 1987, Mr. Belter agreed to the stipulation made in the motion of approval. He questioned concentrated mailboxes preferring to have them at each lot. The City Manager has agreed to allow this. Mr. Belter also questioned the requirement to build sidewalks along the new road and Ethan Allen Drive. His arguments are: 1) the subdivision is 2 miles from the closest bus stop and therefore it would be unlikely that employees in the subdivision would use sidewalks for that purpose; and 2) it would be difficult to get a sidewalk plow to this area in the winter. Traffic: A traffic study (enclosed) was completed by Roger Dickinson of Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn. Craig Leiner will have his comments on the study for the meeting. The study concluded that the project will adversely effect the intersection of Shamrock Road, Airport Parkway and Ethan Allen Drive and that it is a 2 w*jEMORANDUM South Burlington August 21, 1987 Planning Commission high accident location". The proposed improvements are: 1) Street lighting to provide adequate visibility and sight distances; 2) Signage; 3) Hazard identification beacons on each approach in conjunction with signage. The proposed geometric changes on Airport Parkway are: 1) Southbound left -turn lane at Shamrock Road; 2) Northbound right -turn lane at Ethan Allen Drive; 3) Widen Ethan Allen Drive to 3 approach lanes; 4) Remove crest on Shamrock Road to improve sight distances. In addition, 1992 Design Hour Volumes do not warrant a signal. The City of South Burlington recently signed an agreement with the Vermont AOT for them to perform a preliminary engineering study to replace Lime"Kiln Bridge. The Planning Commission should consider an impact fee to fund the reconstruction of Lime Kiln Bridge based on the trip ends generated by the entire industrial subdivision. The enumerated improvements should be funded in whole or in part by the developer and constructed to City standards. Green Mountain Power Company sent a letter to FitzPatrick- Llewellyn regarding development below the power lines. (See enclosed letter) All changes requested by GMP must be complied with in order to provide compatible joint use of the power line r.o.w. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. 5) ORCHARD LAKE ROAD PROPERTIES, HINESBURG ROAD The applicant proposes to construct a two-story, 96,200 square foot building on the 80 acre lot south of Lane Press. The building will be used to manufacture electrical equipment ("Dyna- Power"). Access: A 30 foot wide access drive is shown off the existing Private 30 foot wide drive to Lane Press to the north of the Proposed building. Future access will also be obtained from the proposed extension of Swift Street. (See Bill's memo regarding this alignment.) Circulation: Circulation is around the north west and south west. of the building where the parking lots are located. The 30 foot 3 'l+ 1 §�uut4 Nurltugtuu Fire Department 575 Doroet Itreet *nuth Burlington, Vermont 05401 r TO: FROM RE: DATE: 1. 0 3. MEMORANDUM $0. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE PLANS REVIEWED and".* Farrell Distributing Proposed Garage I OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658.7960 Plans reviewed and at this time the only problem I see is one hydrant in needed to be relocated. I did meet with Mark Lucas on the change. LBD Development Hinesburg Road No problem found at this time on the lay out of the lots but more information is needed on the water system and hydrant layout. Summer Woods Development Patchen Road The only problem I see at this time on this project is with the building units 41 to 46 we do not have proper access for equipment. 4. Ethan Allen Farm Phase 3 At this time I do not see a problem for the fire department in given fire protection. '5,uut +N urtington .dire Department 575 Borset #treet H -- —*outb liurlington, Vermont 05401 1 z ry OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 MEMORANDUM ---------------- TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY AUGUST 2S,1987 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: AUGUST 203,1987 #1. ETHAN ALLEN FARM SUB -DIVISION PHASE 3 LOTS 22-42 PLANS REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS PROJECT. #2. ORCHARD LAKE ROAD PROPERTY HINESBURG ROAD PLANS BEEN REVIEWED AND BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING THERE IS NOT GOOD ACCESS TO THE BUILDING FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT. #3. LOT-3 GREGORY DRIVE OVER ALL I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS BUILDING BUT DUE TO THE SIZE ONE HYDRANT SHOULD BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPERTY AND LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT. #4. DESLAURIER/DORSET STREET PROPERTY. Q�P�C�1fi��(i PLANS REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE FOLLOWING WAS FOUND WHICH NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED �aee_n FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE: A. ROADS TO BE NO LESS THEN 30FT. WIDE. B. BUILDINGS TO BE SO LOCATED ON PROPERTY FOR BETTER ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT. C. LOOPED WATER SYSTEM AND PROPER NUMBER OF HYDRANTS INSTALLED FOR SIZE OF BUILDINGS AT LOCATIONS APPROVED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: July 28, 1987 agenda items Date: July 25, 1987 3) IRISH FARMS, HARBOR ROAD EXTENSION 1. The parcel of land north of the water tank becomes a building lot and should be included in the subdivision. 2. The same type of road cross section as existing Harbor Ridge Road shall continue to the new cul de sac, that should also include sidewalk. The existing cul de sac shall be removed. 3. Two inlets shall be added where cross culvert exists to drain new roadway. Headwalls shall be constructed on extended culverts. 4. Detail plans shall be submitted. These plans shall show water, sewer, utility's including street lights. 4) ETHAN ALLEN FARMS, INDUSTRIAL PARK, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE 1. Sewer manhole #9 should have a 8" stub northerly. 2. Previously approved lots along the north side of the new street shall have sewer stub provided. 3. There should be additional drainage inlets. A set of inlets should drain no more than 300 feet of pavement especially where the street grade is flat. 4. On site sewage disposal should be discouraged even if it is temporary. The Airport Parkway Plant will accept additional sewage about October 1, 1987. 5. A turnout for a central mailbox location should be provided. 6. Provide a stub in MH 1-B so that the line can be extended. This line (along Ethan Allen Drive) should have service connections to serve previously approval lots. 7. An association of land owners should be formed. They should be responsible for maintenance of the off site holding ponds and drainage lines. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: August 25, 1987 agenda items Date: August 21, 1987 2) SUMMER WOODS, PATCHEN ROAD, REVISION DATED 8/19/87 1. This is a much better plan. I would recommend that the future extension of the street into the Munson property be shown in dash and a large note stating that the street will continue northerly into the Munson property when it is developed. 4) ETHAN ALLEN FARMS, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE 1. Comments in memo of July 25, 1987 especially number 1, 2, 3 were not complied with. 2. A plan detailing the location of gas, telephone, electricity, T.V. cable and street lights shall be submitted for review and approval. 3. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to see to it that lots 23 - 28, with on site sewage disposal, hook into the sewer system when it is completed. 4. Water fittings shall be wrapped with polyethylene where concrete thrust blocks are used. 5. Trees shall be planted at least 5 feet from the water main. 6. Depth of topsoil replacement (4 inches) should be noted on typical detail on page 8. 5) ORCHARD LAKE ROAD PROPERTIES 1. When Swift Street extension is constructed the joint entrance drive to this development and Lane Press will have to be adjusted slightly to intersect Swift Street Extension at a right. angle. The developer should anticipate this adjustment. 2. The previous owner allowed the City use of the vacant land for sludge disposal. The City would like to resume that privilege until the land is developed or the owner feels the City is creating a nuisance. The disposal will be by injecting the sludge into the soil. 1 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Kathryn Perkins, Acting City Planner Re: July 28, 1987 agenda items Date: July 24, 1987 3) IRISH FARM, TOM DROLETTE, FINAL PLAT Tom Drolette proposes a 3 lot residential subdivision on a 40.9 acre parcel. At sketch plan Mr. Drolette agreed to build a city standard road, with City sewer and water connections extended for each lot, to access each lot. A sidewalk will be built as well. A bond for the street shall be posted and the sewer fee of $2.50 per gallon (1350 gpd) shall be paid prior to permit. See Bill Szymanski's comments. 4) JOHN BELTER, ETHAN ALLEN FARMS, PHASE III, PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Belter proposes to subdivide 52.4 acres into 21 lots. At sketch plan the subdivision was on 32.2 acres. The lot numbers have changed. Lots 1 - 21 are now labeled as 22 - 40. A new road south of and off of Ethan Allen Drive, will provide access to all the new lots except lots 39 and 40. A future private driveway, 32 feet in width, is proposed to access lots 39 and 40. Elevations on all lots and floodplain information from the Flood Insurance Program maps were requested at Sketch Plan to be shown at Preliminary Plat. No construction is permitted within the Flood Plain. On site waste water disposal for several lots is proposed until municipal sewer can be extended to the lots by the developer. If this is not acceptable, the developer could contribute part of the cost of extending the sewer lines. This many on site disposal systems may be a hazard to the environment. See Bill Szymanski's comments. Chief Goddette is on vacation. He must approve these plans prior to permit. No street trees are shown on the plan. Hardwood Street trees must be planted 60 feet on center along both sides of new road. Bonds for streets and landscaping must be posted prior to permit. G > J Memorandum Planning Commission March 6, 1987 6) RPM DEVELOPMENT, 5 GREGORY DRIVE Paul Marquis proposes to subdivide the 80,822 square foot lot into two parcels of 40,364.and 40,458 square feet.. The Commis- sion approved a 6,000 square foot building on the southerly parcel two weeks ago. Access will remain from the existing curb cut. It is completely located on the southerly most parcel. A right—of-way must be granted to parcel B. The plan must be surveyed for the final plat and show all. utilities. See Bill Sz,ymanski's comments. 7), BELTER--, AIRPORT PARKWAY AND ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE John Belter proposes to subdivide 32.2 acres into 21 lots. This is on an expansion to the 21 lot subdivision already approved. The floodplain and GMP and Velco power lines limit development within this area. The area is zoned Industrial -Commercial. The majority of the new lots are shown south of Ethan Allen Drive behind the Belter and Berard lots. All but two of these new lots (#18 and 19) will be served by a new public street. The new street aligns with Lime Rock Road which is located on the north side of Ethan Allen Drive. It should be built to -r-o.mmercial standards with 32 feet of pavement width and curbs. The Commis- sion should discuss whether shared curbcuts should be located in advance to help control access., Access to two lots (#18 and 19) is shown by a 60 foot right-of- way since they have no road frontage. This could be reduced to 20 feet. The Planning Commission should discuss these two lots since they require specific approval. Two additional lots (#20 and 21) are shown as part of this subdivision. Lot *20 is located at the top of Ethen Allen Drive behind an existing building. This lot appears to be completely in the flood plain. Elevations on all lots and floodplain infor- mation from the Flood Insurance Program Maps must be shown at Preliminary Plat. Lot #21 will have a new driveway off of Air- port Parkway that is presently used by Ashline. The road is incorrectly labelled as Lime Kiln Road and should be labelled Airport Parkway. All lots should be serviced by City sewer and water. Details must be shown at preliminary plat. See Bill Sz,ymanski's comments. 3 3. Swift Street extension should have a paved width of 32 feet with curbs and sidewalk placed one foot off the street, 80 foot r.o.w. line. I would recommend curbs and sidewalk be waived for the first 500 feet because when the Calkins property is acquired the intersection will have to be realigned. 7), ETHAN ALLEN FARMS, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE 1: Lot 20 may be partially in the 106 year flood plain. 2. A commercial -industrial development of this density should have a street paved width of 32 feet. 3. Sewer design will be coordinated with the City so that the design is such that it can also serve Country Club Estates. s �§autb +i.." urlingtvn fire Department f 575 jDaroct �-�trect _i �autb i6tirlingtan. llermant L15401 f MEMORANDUM ---------------- TO: ISO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY MARCH 10,1987 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: MARCH 2,1987 #l. ETHAN ALLEN FARM PROJECT #87018 21 LOT SUB -DIVISION w OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THE LOTS, BUT MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED ON THE WATER SYSTEM AND LOCATION OF HYDRANTS. #2. AUTO RADIO SALES & WAREHOUSE 59 SWIFT STREET PLANS REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS PROJECT. #3. BURLINGTON AIRPORT FAA BUILDING PLAN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE ONLY THING NEEDED IS TO FINISH LOOPING THE WATER SYSTEM AND INSTALL THE LAST HYDRANT AS APPROVED WITH THE ADDITION TO THE AIRPORT MAIN BUILDING AND AUTOMATED FLIGHT BUILDING. #4. SOUTHSETT AT SWIFT PROJECT # 86037 THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE SERVICE ON THIS PROJECT: A. ALL BUILDINGS MUST BE 30FT. APART SINGLE HOMES AS WELL AS MULTI -FAMILY UNITS. B. ALL ROADS MUST BE AT LEAST 30FT. WIDE. C. MULTI -UNITS SHOULD HAVE MORE THEN TWO PARKING SPACES. GARAGES SHOULD NOT COUNT AS A SPACE. D. MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED ON HYDRANT LOCATION AND WATER SYSTEM. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCOR► SATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO L UV i t I VV ` Pain VL 1yfCq C 5-�- LrEUO�_.J' 01F UMRSOWMU DATE \ , L Z S _� JOB NO. $1 C 1 ATTENTION RE: 6#aVL k GV 6,1 Lv l51e-, WE ARE SENDING YOU [l Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: Ll Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order 1k "A &kA-A 11 Aj COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION i Felo 19 B1 _Za%6 00 e v' CJ t u-w Ve c o-v_rla bLL («. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use xAs requested ❑ For review and comment REMARKS ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections W1 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints Ll PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US cl.'U:6 ee, t I COPY TO SIGNED: UCCLLU(11)�_ PRODUCT 240-2 Ees Imo,&d., Mm 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCOF RATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO Cn .F 'zRy \;-\� CJ� CUB S-1S Tex e-� � jN�7�� r Uz OS�u3 LCEUUL A (D)IF TURZOADT"TQ& DATE � JOB NO. � /\ ATTENTION RE: Z/ (_ S��v�s4caJ WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via /VeS; &` the following items: 17 Shop drawings ❑ Prints I� Pllan,s, ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order 7 l� C/y'i1C COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2r21n�1�vg{u lAIt SLr30i✓i iUA-1 Ak u(A<)O-"-) '' NsTjZU C1'Q IAA.) Ns rLoR t r1 PL,• n THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment Did2 ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS �t2 1�.1:ZtYL 5410v�,o �� �4 '�IA� G�'t^I GF�►cxS ., t1k� ^ - -ti (WN2� t0 S'�41J _ F�PI '-i_h5ncN✓ A-uo C"W dr.P C"iEa- F n�, rra� ti��. a-Y0 , O0i, COPY PRODUCT 240.2 � Irk., GM , Me 0 14 71 SIGNED: �{;jynp,p CtytR/� It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. { ��U'H BUN IINC,pN f 44 *0 4 eMFo A r0 W X 9A PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 September 4, 1987 John Belter 2 Country Clu Drive South Burling on, Vermont 05403 Re: Ethan Allen Farms, Phase III Dear Mr. Belter: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the minutes of the August 25, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. It is your responsibility to record a revised final plat with the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Please be sure that all of the revisions in the approval motion are shown on your plans. Sincerely, 4 _ J� Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encl cc: Lance Llewellyn Roger Dickinson GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE • BOX 850 • SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05402 • (802) 864-5731 August 28, 1987 Mr. Geoffrey W. Green, Assistant District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: Application #4C0643-3 Phase 3 - Ethan Allen Farms Dear Mr. Green: Pursuant to our recent phone conversation, Green Mountain Power Corporation requests party status to Application #4C0643-3 under criteria 9K. All of our concerns and comments will be with regard to the approximately 4,000 feet of high voltage transmission lines through the project. I have enclosed -a letter dated, July 28, 1987 to Mr. Roeder at Fitzpatrick - Llwellyn, Inc. There are comments concerning sewage treatment areas for two of the proposed lots and some general comments that apply to all the proposed lots traversed by GMP 100' right-of-way. I spoke with Mr. Roeder on August 4 and he indicated that the mound systems had been abandoned and that the leach field on Lot #28 would be moved. I presume these changes are reflected on the site plan you have received. GMP is not opposed to the project; however, we would request to be notified for review and comments on the Site Plans for Lots #23-#37 when they each are presented for approval. Please submit any correspondence to me at the following address: Conrad H. Miller Green Mountain Power Corporation P.O. Box 850 South Burlington, VT 05402 Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely yours, �dZo Conrad H. Miller Manager of Real Estate CHM:dth cc: James Roeder, Fitzpatrick-Llwellyn, Inc. C. Lyons - VELCO Planning Commission, City of South Burlington I I City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 August 21, 1987 John Belter 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Ethan Allen Farm, 21 Industrial .Lots Dear Mr. Belter: ZONING ADMINISTRAT'= 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission. Also enclosed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 25, 1987 to represent your request. Sincerely, _or Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encl.s cc: Lance Llewellyn PLANNER 658.7955 City of South Burlinurton 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMCNr 05401 August 20, 198/ John Belter 2 Country C1ub'Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Ethan Allen Farms, 21 lot subdivisio:- Dear Mr. Belter: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the minutes of the July 28, 1,987 Planning Commission meeting. Please call me if yo.. have any questions. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encl cc: Lance Llewellyn FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCG )RATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878.3000 TO KrT R� P'KINS Cr/ Or- Syu711-4 SlA9ZUNG 7v(\) 1-1-9 :DbPSC i �CC� J 0 Lx D-A 0, P,L) ,JG701v , 1% �t r1n 0 NTF 05y()3 WE ARE SENDING YOU 0< Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings Cz/-Copy of letter ct•-10"1K P-rEmA ors umamnEou-mu- DATE — _7 ^o' JOB NO. -g7 �`U � ff ATTENTION RE: Sc,(- - ") ) V IS tO"J ?�Z,o Fri c, Ln,1'PA(fT L L(AE0 ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval XFor your use ❑ As requested X For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections El the following items: ❑ Specifications ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-2 EB$ iM., crobr, max 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at o FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INC )GRATED Engineering & Planning Services The Kiln - 15 Brickyard Road ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 (802) 878.3000 � s m WE ARE SENDING YOU XAttached ❑ Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings X Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ LEEUU� OF-TRUSETTYQ& DATE � , , � � JOB NO. ATTENTION J ckntiL RE: the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 4 o E41exvi h+ticv, Fo-v-an — Sk.e_+ean P1ay.- 1 � Ir��-�c.�► PI c,,�,�, 1� I ►c a.�, rn THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted XAs requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: !�-2k_-1 0 "C-C 1 1211 aia � PRODUCT 2402 � Inc., crtm, Mm 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Biirling;ton 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 March 23, 1987 John Belter 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 21 lot Subdivision, Ethan Allen Drive Dear John: Enclosed are the minutes of the March 10, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. You may apply for Preliminary Plat at your convenience. JBL/mcp cc: Lance Llewellyn Sincerely, r Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 March 6, 1987 John Belter 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Ethan Allen Drive, 2 Lot subdivision Dear Mr. Belter: Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Commission re- garding your plan. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, March 10, 1987 to represent your application. JBL/mcp Encls CC: Lance Llewellyn Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 July 24, 1987 0 Lance Llewellyn Fitzpatrick - Lewellyn Associates 1 Wentworth Drive, Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Ethan Allen Farms, 21 Lot subdivision Dear Mr. Llewellyn: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my comments to the Planning Commission regarding your plan. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 28, 1987 to represent your application. Sincerely, R 410e, L—L— Kathryn Perkins, Acting City Planner KLP/mcp cc: John Belter Encls Mate of Vermont AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental EnginE:cring Natural Resources Conservation Council Phone: 879-6563 Date: August 13, 1987 John and Joyce Belter 2 o rive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Departtnent of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 RE: EC-4-1183 21 lot commercial s 4C0643-3), So. Burlington Dear Mr. & Mrs. Belter: On behalf of the Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering of the Agency of Environmental Conservation, I acknowledge receipt of the application for the above referenced application. Based on our present workload, we anticipate review of yout project in approximately 300 days. Please refer to the above case number in any correspondence with this office. If you have not already done so, you should check with town officials regarding any local requirements you may need to meet. You are reminded that no construction can proceed until a permit is issued in writing. Sincerely, J i enda M. Gilmond Protection Secretary cc: Town Planning Commission Consultant , FitzPatrick-Llewellyn This letter fulfills the notice requirements of 18 V.S.A. -1218. 7/28/87 KLP MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Preliminary Plat • application of John Belter for a 21 lot , subdivision on acres, as depicted on a set of plans, the first page entitled, "Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3, lots 22 - 42, overall site plan," prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., dated February 1987, last revised July 1, 1987, with the following stipulations: 1. Sewer manhole #9 should have an 8" stub northerly. 2. Previously approved lots along the north side of the new street shall have sewer stub provided. 3, Additional inlets shall be provided. --grvv i de d . 5. A stub in MH 1-B shall be provided so that the line can be extended. 6. An association of landowners shall beAresponsible for the maintenance of the off -site holding ponds and drainage lines. 7. Hardwood street trees, 60 feet on center,shall be planted on both sides of the new road. Bonds for- and landscaping shall be posted prior to permit. �yY4-j 8. A traffic study shall be completed and reviewed by Craig Leiner prior to Final Plata oval. 9. Lots 22 through 28 and 42 shall be approved with on site sewer systems and the rest (29 through 4) must be hooked up to City sewer prior to issuance of building permit. The on site sewer system shall be designed so as to be able to hook into City sewer when it is extended Q4+t, &,,,ret -, 10. The street shall be built to City standards/P The developer shall furnish the City with the name of the contractors doing the work, and the architect engineer's name who will stake out and supervise the work within 7 days prior to beginning of road construction. Upon completion of the work the architect and/or engineer shall certify that the work is in conformance with the approved plans, stipulations and any other requirements and/or changes that the City request. Il-epv a� �,iv�.� c� ;u4r l W/in 50` n..c>�c� 1. The Final Plat application must be submitted within 12 months or this approval is null and void. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, August 25, 1987 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final Plat application of John Belter Jr., for a 21 lot commercial subdivision on a ± 38 acre parcel. The property is bounded on the north by R & L Shand, R & J Berard, J & E Goldberg, T. Chastenay, V.T. Ventures and J. McKeown, S & D Hard, F & M Taft, L & R Dumont, S. Unsworth and K. Martinez, F. Naef and R. Volk, D & L Barchard, City of South Burlington (Ethan Allen Drive), Green Mountain Power Corporation, A & R Berard, R. Berard, K & C Smith, on the west by N. Ward, N. Barrett and Fairdale Farms, G. Brady, 0. Kopystianskyj, D & R Sutton, H & J Bruner and on the bast and south by the Winooksi River and is located on Ethan Allen Drive. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. August 8, 1987 Peter L. Jacob Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission 1 1 ACT 250 NOTICE APPLICATION AND HEARING 10 V.S.A., Sec. 6083-6088 Application #4C0643-3 was filed on August 11,1987 by John H. Be.lte.r, 2 Country Club Estates, South Burlington, VT 05403 to further subdivide a 345 acre tract of land from of a prexiously approved commercial subdivision into 21 commercial lots and the construction of 2300 if of road and uti.l.it.ies to be served by municipal water and on -site septic systems, located oef of Ethan Allen Drive in South Burlington. This project will be evaluated in accordance with the 10 environmental criteria. of 10 V.S.A., 6086(a). Statutory parties to this application are the municipality of South Burlington, the South Burlington Planning Commission, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, affected State agencies and any adjacent Vermont municipality- and planning commission. Adjoining property owners may participate t.o the e�;tent that, the proposal will have a direct effect on their property under the 10 criteria. Other persons may participate at the discretion of the District Commission. If you wish to participate, please contact the Coordinator for further information before the first hearing or date specified below. Copies of the application and plans for this project are available for inspection by members of the public during regular working hours at the Colchester Town Office, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Office and the District #4 Environmental Office. A public hearing is scheduled for 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, September 8, 1987 at the Chittenden County Regional Planning Offic e, 66 Pearl Street, Essex Junction, Vermont.. A Site visit will be held at 4:30 pm on September 8, 1987 at the Ethan Allen Drive project in South Burlington, VT. By Geo fret' . Green, Assistant District #4 Coordinator 11.1 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 7/28/87 KLP MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Preliminary Plat application of John Belter for a 21 lot subdivision on 52.4 acres, as depicted on a set of plans, the first page entitled, "Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3, lots 22 - 42, overall site plan," prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., dated February 1987, last revised July 1, 1987, with the following stipulations: 1. Sewer manhole #9 should have an 8" stub northerly. 2. Previously approved lots along the north side of the new street shall have sewer stub provided. 3, Additional inlets shall be provided. 4. A turn out for a central mailbox location shall be provided. 5. A stub in'MH 1-B shall be'provided so that the line can be extended. 6. An association of landowners shall be responsible for the maintenance of the off -site holding ponds and drainage lines. 7. Hardwood street trees, 60 feet on center,shall be planted on both sides of the new road. Bonds for streets and landscaping shall be posted prior to permit. 8. A traffic study shall be completed and reviewed by Craig Leiner prior to Final Plat approval. 9. Lots 22 through 28 and 42 shall be approved with on site sewer systems and the rest (29 through 40) must be hooked up to City sewer prior to issuance of building permit. The on site sewer system shall be designed so as to be able to hook into City sewer when it is extended. 10. The street shall be built to City standards. The developer shall furnish the City with the name of the contractors doing the work, and the architect engineer's name who will stake out and supervise the work within 7 days prior to beginning of road construction. Upon completion of the work the architect and/or engineer shall certify that the work is in conformance with the approved plans, stipulations and any other requirements and/or changes that the City request. 11. The Final Plat application must be submitted within 12 months or this approval is null and void. 8/24/87 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat of John H. Belter, Jr. for a 21 lot industrial -commercial subdivision as depicted on a 10 page set of plans entitled "Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3, lots 22 - 42" prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, dated February 1987, stamp dated August 5, 1987 with the following stipulations: 1. A landscaping bond for street trees in an amount determined by the City Planner shall be posted prior to any construction. A suitable street tree shall be substituted for the Ash. All trees shall be at least 2 1/2 inch caliper, not 2 inch. 2. A bond shall be posted for streets prior to construction. The amount shall be determined by the City Engineer. 3. The following changes shall be made to the plan within 90 days: a) Sewer manhole #9 shall have an 8" stub northerly. b) All previously approved lots along the northern side of the new street shall have a sewer stub. c) Additional drainage inlets to drain where grades are flat and to limit drainage to 300 feet for each set of inlets. 4) An association of landowners to maintain off site Bolding ponds and drainage ponds shall be formed. This will not be City responsibility. 5. The developer shall furnish the City with the name of the contractors doing the street work, the architect and the engineer who will stake out and supervise the work at least 7 days prior to „v beginning of road construction. Upon completion of the work, the Vyy architect and/or engineer shall certify that the work is in conformance with the approved plan, stipulations and any other requirements and/or changes that the City requests. 6. The existing trees along Shamrock Road bordering lot #41 for a depth of 15 feet shall not be removed. 7. The private drive serving lots 39 and 40 shall be 24 feet wide within a 50 foot right of way. This shall be shown on the plans. D®O ^� 8. A sewer allocation of gallons per day is made for the f l sewered lots. The $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. No on lots 29 through 41 until. 2 capacity is available at the Airport Parkway Treatment Plant.l�.t 9. The applicant shall be responsible for payingra.-- -peena share of the required improvements to the intersectio based on the =� trip ends generated by these industrial lots. The total cost and scope of improvements shall be established_;" t City Engineer in consultation with the Street Supervisor] an e Regional Planning Commiss-ion Traffic Engineer. O eAoL 10. It is the applicants responsibility to record corrected final plats with the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void. They shall be approved by the City Planner and signed by the Chairman or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. QOC4\r 44- QA"o,,.-i 1,�� Moot �2 ce o',C11-i ate. -a°b PU151,1C 111-: AI?ING SOUTII lull'k I NGTON 1) LnNN I NG COMM I SS I ON The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Ro(mi, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final Plat application of Tom Drolette for a three lot residential subdivision on a 40.9 acre parcel. The property is bounded on the north by Mayer and Lyman,.'Rice, Linton, on the east by Trevithick, Benson, Smith, a•nd Pappas,: -'on the west'by the Irish Farm, and on the south by Champlain Water District and will -be located on Harbor -� Ridge Road extension. 2) Final Plat application of William Shearer for a 56 unit Planned Unit Development on 15.5 acres. Property is bounded by R. Munson and Melna Concrete to the north, J. Brill, T. Shepherd, S. Stebbins —tothe east. the City of South Burlington (Jaycee Park), R. LaBarge, C_ Perkins, Gardenway, Inc., and-R:-Precourt to the south, and F. Lamplough to the west , and is located west of 159 and 173 3) Preliminary Plat application of John H. Belter Jr., for a 21 lot commercial subdivision on a 52.4 acre parcel. The property is bounded on the north by R & L Shand, R & J Berard, J & E Goldberg, T. Chastenay, V.T. Ventures and J. McKeown, S & D Hard, F & M Taft, L & R Dumont, S. Unsworth and K. Martinez, F. Naef and R. Volk, D & L Barchard, City of South Burlington (Ethan Allen Drive), Green Mountain Power Corporation, A & R Berard, R. Berard, K & C. Smith, on the west by N. Ward, N. Barrett and Fairdale farms, G. Brady, 0. Kopystiansky-j , D & R Sutton, H & J Bruner and on the east and south by the Winooski River and is located on Ethan Allen Drive. 4 ) Revised Final Plat application of _IDB 7nnnrpnrated ( MPry Rros•in4 -for- -- a 112 lot single-family subdivision with 21 acres of open space__-__ 71.8 acres and a 28 acre parcel o� industrial land for the_fLture____ park facility. Property is bounded on the north by G. Rye and-E. El -ill, on the west by R. Calkins and D. Economou, on the south by Butler Farms Development (H & M Dubois) and is located at 1175 H_inesburzg__Road. Copies of the _ applications are available for public inspection - at the South Burlington City Hall. Peter L. Jacoh Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission July 11, 1987 GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE • BOX 850 • SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05402 • (802) 864-5731 July 28, 1987 Mr. James Roeder Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 Re: Ethan Allen Farms Phase 3 - Lots 22-42 Dear Mr. Roeder: Thank you for sending me a copy of your July 6, 1987 letter and the associated site plan dated July 16, 1987. I have also received a copy of Mr. Beard's letter to you dated July 9, 1987, concerning VELCO's easement area. In general, GMP's comments and concerns are similar to VELCO's. Specifically, GMP has the following comments: 1. Sewage treatment areas: a. Lot #29 - The normal replacement area crosses the centerline of the easement. If used, the finish grade of the area could jeopardize the clearances needed to conform with the N.E.S.C. The line would then need to be elevated. b. Lot #28 - The proposed leach field is also directly beneath the centerline. The finished elevation does not pose a problem; however, necessary travel by utility vehicles could damage the system. Required Changes: Place treatment areas twenty-five feet from and par- allel to the centerline of the easement. 2. Stockpiling of materials beneath live conductors: a. Is not permitted. b. Certain "temporary" construction stockpiling may be permitted with written consent from GMP. 3. Landscaping: a. Vegetation with mature height of 15 feet is recom- mended; otherwise it will be cut when it becomes a hazard. b. Placement should not be directly under the conductor for accessibility to the lines. Mr. James Roeder 7/28/87 Page 2 4. Outdoor Lighting: a. Maximum height should be 12 feet. b. Placement should not interfere with access to lines. C. Horizontal placement will be on an individual basis. 5. Access: a. Must be maintained for proper operation and mainte- nance. b. Fences are not permitted within the easement area; and appropriate gates, etc. must be provided if fences are placed along the easement area. 6. Changes in Grade: a. Cutting or filling within easement must be reviewed by GMP for comments and approvals. b. Costs for changing the lines due to cuts or fills will be the responsibility of the requesting party. GMP recognizes the need for some joint uses of its right-of-way. A variety of uses are certainly compatible and sometimes bene- ficial to the operation and maintenance of our facilities. Our primary concern in these comments is to provide for the continued safe and reliable electrical needs of our customers, both now and in the future. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, C Conrad H. Miller Manager of Real Estate CHM/ltr cc: C. Lyons - VELCO ',Planning Commission - City of South Burlington Act 250 - Essex CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGI"ON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1) Name of Applicant John H. Belter, Jr. 2) Nano of Subdivision Ethan Allen Farms, Phase 3 (1 ots 22-42) 3) Submit Subdivision Fee 4) Describe Subdivision (i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, gross floor area for caTunercial or industrial uses): 52.4 acres Commercial Subdivision, 21 Lots. General commercial uses anticipated -. 5) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: Address: 2 Country Club Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 6) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc. 1 Wentworth Dr. Williston, Vt. 05495 Attn: Lance Llewellyn 878-3000 b. Surveyor Warren A. Robenstien Sunderland Hollow Rd. Colchester, Vt. 05446 878-2359. See Plat entitled Ethan Allen Farm, Industrial Subdivision, Lots 9-21, dated c. Attorfey Charles Shea, C/O Gravel & Shea August, 1985. 109 South Winooski Avenue, Burlinvton, Vermont 658-0220 d. Plat Designer Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated 7) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since sketch plan application: Lot n rn ring schp-me_ changes{; minor lot line reykliQns_ Applicant is now applying for on -site wastewater disposal for several lots in the interim until municipal sewer can be extended. names and iiuiling addresses of owners of record of all contiguous �rties: See attached list of abutters. ' 9) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designers) of the preliminary maps) accompanying this application: See eight (8) sheet construction drawing set submitted herewith. 10) COST ESTIMATES for Planned Unit Deve lopments, mult i- family projects, and coiraroDrcial and industrial complexes: (a) Buildings permits are for sitework/utility construction only at this time (b) Landscaping $14,000 (street trees) (c) All Other Site Improvements (e.g., curb work) $400,000 for road & utilities 11) I:sTIMA,rED ` IW-' 'IC for Planned Unit Developux-,nts, multi -family projects, and c,-curunercial and industrial complexes (2-way traffic, in plus out) : A.M. Peak hour _ 151 vte/hr. P.M. peak hour 166 vte hr. Average dail traffic 1,278 vte/day of trucks 10-20% 12) Attach four copies of: a preliminary map showing the following information: 1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the city. 2) Name and address of owner of record,subdivider and designer of Prelim- i.nnry Plat. 3) NLunber of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas,and other essential exist- ing physical features. - 2- 4) The names of all sukxlivisions iiinediately adjacent and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. 5) The location and size of any existing sewers and water mains, culverts and drains on the property or, serving the property to be subdivided. 6) 1.4)cation, na►nes and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks and other public or privately mraintained open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. 7) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geoloq- ical Survey datum of existing grades and also of proposed finished grades where change of existing ground elevation will be five feet or more. 8) Witplete survey cif subdivision tract by a licer►sed land surveyor. 9) Numerical and graphic scale, date and true north arrow. 10) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative means of providing water supply to the proposed subdivision. 11) Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 12) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed,, location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface soil, rock and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results of percolation tests. 13) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. 14) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culverts which may be required. 15) The location of temporary markers adequate.to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic layout in the field. Unless an existing street intersection is,shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. -3- 16) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and t:he conditions of such dedication or reservation. 13) Developmental timetable (including number of phases, and start and coq:)letion dates) Commence work upon receipt of permits-(est. August 1987) Complete all site work within one (1) year, excepting pump station and force main 14) List the waivers-4pplicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: N/A 15) Attach a vicinity irk:ip showing the following: 1) All existing subdivisions, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the record owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street adjoining the proposed subdivision. ') Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or proposed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed sub- division and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the subdivider's entire holding. (signature) applicant or contact person date LIST -OF -ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS ETHAN_ALLEN_FARMS _INDUSTRIAL -SUBDIVISIDN_--�_pH4SE_3,_22-42 Note: All addresses are South Burlington, VT 05403, unless specified. Robert and Lynda Shand �m� 5Et|a- Allen Drive' �V' Rene and June Berard Box 2039 Jeff and Elizabeth Goldberg 40 Peterson Terrace ' Tom Chastenay �J 29 Charles Street « J.T Ventures and J. McKeown 51 Sand Hill Road Pi Essex Junction, VT 05452 Stephen and Daphne Hard Box 129 Burlington, VT 05401 Fred and Marion Taft 1893 Airport Parkway Leo and Robert Dumont 14 Duval Street S. Unsworth and K. Martinez Box 4060 , ~ F. Naef and R. Volk 4 Park Terrace �/ y� Essex Junction, VT 05452 Dave and Leslie Barchard 1906 Airport Parkway «- ^J City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street Green Mountain Power Corp. -� 25 Green Mountain Drive Bernard and Nancy Ward 5 Shamrock Road W L I ST _OF _ABUTTERS _FOR _ETHAN _ALLEN _FARMS , _PHASE _3 _ (CONTINUED) Norman Barrett and Fairdale Farms, Inc. V 7 Shamrock Road George Brady 9 Shamrock Road V Olga Kopystianskyj i 11 Shamrock Road V`� Donald and Rose Sutton Vi 15 Shamrock Road Harvey and Joyce Bruner 17 Shamrock Road Allan and Rose Berard 1430 Hinesburg Road Randy Berard 77 Ethan Allen Drive Kenneth and Charles Smith 6 Pheasant Way f4 ' /^ CIIly 0y SOUlH UUDUING-ION Subdivision Application - SKE�Iai PU\N l) 0anL-, address, and phone nmnbec of: a. owner of record John and Joyce Be|tcc Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 - b. Applicant same as above Lance A. Llev/c1koo, P.E. FbzParick-LlewellynIncorporated ' Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 2) Purposu, lcCatimFI, and Of xuL)division or develzxpioent, includimJ nuk-ur of Lots, units, oi //.//cels amd JAu[X/acd use(s). 21 Commercial/Industrial lots. 17 lots fronting on a 30/ wide road connecting Ethan Allen Drive. Two others served by a 60' right-of-way and two served by30' rights -of -way from Ethan Allen Drive and Lime Kiln Road. . 3) Applicant's lecial interest in thu property (fee sifiiple, option, etc) 4) Names of owners of record of all oonti uous pcopx�ctics /\sh|inc, Berard �) 1)8)e uL cX-1-�LLwJ uc [uOjx)c/1cm/�uuocc* on 1ou��1--ty uuo}/ as uuseoco��, covenants, rights o1 wuy, etc, G.M.P. Utility Easement (lOO' wide) V'E'L'C.O. DtUhz/ Easement (150' wide) )posed extension, relocation, or ircxlif:ication of municipal facilities ;h as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. Served by extensions from existing utilities 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Cor►rrrission which affect the proposed sub- division, and include the dates of such actions: Q) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous prolxrr.ties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all c:oriti.guous land Belonging to owner of record and (b) proposed suWivisiori. 3) Existing and proposed layout oL prolx�r:ty lines; type ,nd lcx.�:aka.ora of existing and prc>l;x)s(-,d restrictions on land, such Las easenu: nts WId COwe- nants. 4) `Ij/i:x- of, location, and approximate size of existinc3 anc Profx) (2d streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (nUuaaericd l Land gr�a{_)laic) . 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed sulk{ivi:;ion to gad jacent prol:x�rty and surrounding area. ���I 6"l G�t�2�-�Ct�_ ►TZpAc jTZIGIL- U v=U--f Q j "C, Ixr.son Z • (Signature applicant or contact. c{ate AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIVISION MAIN BUILDING, SECOND FLOOR ONE NATIONAL LIFE DRIVE MONTPELIER, VT 05620-3522 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: June 12, 2014 -June 23, 2014 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAMES AND ADDRESSES: Ethan Allen Farms 31 Commerce Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER: 3-9010 PERMIT NUMBER: 3870-9010.R PREVIOUS PERMIT NUMBER: 3870-9010 and 1-0621 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RECEIVING WATER: Unnamed tributaries of the Winooski River EXPIRATION DATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE: Ten years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft authorization to discharge proposed for issuance to Ethan Allen Farms and the City of South Burlington for the discharge of stormwater runoff from Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision Phase III located in South Burlington, Vermont to unnamed tributaries of the Winooski River. The means of treatment include overland flow, grass swales, and a detention basin. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application is on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Montpelier office. Copies will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records and may be obtained by calling 802-828-1535 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. -2— PUBLIC COMMENTS Written public comments on the proposed authorization to discharge are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) June 23, 2014, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Watershed Management Division, Stormwater Management Program, Main Building, Second Floor, One National Life Drive, Montpelier, Vermont 05620-3522 or send via email to anr.wsmdstormwatercomments(a state.vt.us. If sending by mail, the general permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the general permit number should appear on the subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered by DEC prior to issuance of an authorization to discharge under the general permit. FINAL ACTION/APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny an authorization to discharge under the general permit. Renewable Energy Projects — Right to Appeal to Public Service Board: Any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Vermont Public Service Board pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §8506 within 30 days of the date of this decision. The appellant must file with the Clerk an original and six copies of its appeal. The appellant shall provide notice of the filing of an appeal in accordance with 10 V.S.A. §8504(c)(2), and shall also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal on the Vermont Department of Public Service. For information, see the Rules and General orders of the Public Service Board available on line at www.psb.ven-nont.gov. The address for the Public Service Board is 112 State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05620-2701 (Tel. #802-828-2358). All Other Projects — Rightppeal to the Environmental Court Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Telephone #802-828-1660). David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation �vERMoNr Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Watershed Management Division Main Building, Second Floor One National Life Drive Montpelier, VT 05620-3522 June 11, 2014 Donna Kinville, City Clerk City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Runoff # 3870 — 9010.R, Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision Phase III Dear Ms. Kinville: Agency of Natural Resources (phone) 802-828-1535 (fax) 802 828-1544 Enclosed are two copies of the Public Notice for the comment period for an Authorization to Discharge under General Permit #3-9010 proposed for issuance to Ethan Allen Farms and City of South Burlington. We respectfully request that a copy of the Public Notice be posted in the Town Offices starting 06/12/2014 through 06/23/2014. The other copy is for your local officials. We are also sending copies of these notices to other local officials and interested persons who have asked to be included on our mailing list. We will be glad to send you additional copies if you desire or add names of interested parties to our mailing list. Sincerely, Stormwater Management Section Enclosures (3) jcc: Selectboard (w/enclosure) To preserve, enhance, restore, and conserve Vermont's natural resources, and protect human health, for the benefit of this and future generations. MASTER LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ETHAN ALLEN FARMS INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION, PHASE 3 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PREPARED BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED ONE WENTWORTH DRIVE WILLISTON, VERMONT 5 AUGUST, 1987 MASTER LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION PLEASE DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE No. Filed: (Loc Date Signature o oor inator I 1. APPLICANT NAME: John H. I3elter, Jr. Phone 1: 863-4!t71 Address: 7 Country Club Drive. South Rurlinntnn, �lnrmnnt 0540� 2. Ownerls) Name Address Phone No. 7ohn H. , Jr. and Joyce Better 2 Country Club Drive. South gur)inf:ton, Vermont R/,'-h 171 3. Book 143 Page 225 Date of Recording: 5/9/ ''9 I4. LEGAL ENTITY Form: Individual Date Formed: Place Formed: Date reg. in VT: (If partnership, list names and addresses of all partners on separate sheet.) 5. PERSON TO CONTACT Name: 1-once A L_levlel_l= Title: P.F. Address: FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc., Williston, VT Phone 1: R78-3000 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 21-' of Commercial Subdivision, includin- 2300 l.f. of roil construction (Include high and low elevations) 232 to 212 Check the municipal services you intend to utilize: Road Maintenance is Police X Fire Protection X Solid Waste Disposal X Water Supply X Sewage Disposal X 7. TOWN City of South Burlington Road s Name: Ethan Allen Drive 8. Attach a copy of town highway map showing the exact location of the project. 9. ACRES OWNED: 345 +/- Acres involved in project: 38 10. PROJECT TO BE STARTED: Fall 1987 Completed: Summer 1988 11. CONSTRUCTION COST: S 400,000 1 Lots: 21 Fee: $ 1 3 1 0.00 12. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the information in the application and the attached schedules are true and accurate, and that, for Act 250 projects only, I have forwarded a com- plete copy of this application to each of the parties entitled to notice pursuant to 10 V.S.A. S6084. (Usually the municipality, the municipal planning commission, and the regional planning commission.) f W'" V/ Q - # ' p icant J1 Date Lan caner s ate l tJ O T I C E COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES A PERMIT pursuant to Title 10 VSA Section 6081 (Act 250) "Commencement of construction" is defined by Act 250 as "the construction of the first improvement on the land or to any structure or.facility located on the land including work preparatory to construction such as clearing, the staking out or use of a right-of-way or in any way incidental to altering the land according to a plan or intention to improve or to divide land by sale, lease or otherwise transfer an interest in the land." (Environmental Board Rule 2 (C)). A violation of any provision of the rules if punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for each day of the violation or imprisonment for not more than two years, or both. (T. 10 VSA, Section 6003). I understand there is to be no site work or construction conurienced on this project until a written Land Use Permit is issued. I further understand that verbal indication that a Land Use Permit may be issued does not constitute authorization to commence construction. / `I. 6,ft, �, - App cant's Sig ature 17 /1� � Date THIS NOTICE MUST BE EXECUTED AND RETURNED WITH YOUR LAND USE APPLICATION. 14 I-EB -8 3 DATE: In accordance with Title 10 V.S.A., S6086, I certify that I have delivered complete sets of this application and all plans and attachments to the municipality (Selectmen, Aldermen, Trustees), the municipal planning commission, the Regional Planning Commission, and any adjacent municipality and municipal planning commission adjoining this project. FEE: "t V3t0.U0 LIST OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS AND ADDRESSES: -/ LOCATION MAP: ,/ COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION NOTICE: ✓ Si ature of Applicant o �M Messenger No Text ETHAN ALLEN FARMS INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 -- LOTS 22-42 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 22 JULY 19137 ACT 250 SCHEDULE B CRITERIA RESPONSES BRIEF -PROJECT -DESCRIPTION ----------------------- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN 1 WENTWORTH DRIVE WILLISTON, VERMONT This Project consists of a proposed twenty-one (21) lot commercial subdivision, 2300 feet of roadway, and associated sitework construction. The parcel of land is zoned for commercial development, and consists of approximately 30 acres of land adjacent to several existing commercial developments, located off Ethan Allen Drive, in South Burlington, Vermont. The lots are a minimum of one acre in size. This application is for a Land Use Permit to allow for land subdivision, and the construction of roadway, utilities, and general site work. These commercial lots will require a Permit Amendment to allow for development. At such time, particular issues dealing with each specific lot will be addressed. The Project is to be served by public utilities; however, several of the lots are proposed to be served by on -site wastewater disposal as an interim measure, until approval for construction of wastewater pumping facility is obtained. Upon completion of the sewer system, pump station, and force main, all lots shall be served by municipal wastewater disposal. Lot 42, due to its remote location, is proposed to be served by on -site utilities in perpetuity. Criteria -#1--Air -and -Water -Pollution -------------------------------- _A i r_ Pollution 1. Describe the type of heating system proposed (include BTU's if any known): RESPONSE: As this application is for subdivision and site construction only, the sources of heating are not known at this time, and are left to the discretion of the individual lot owner. Sources of heat currently available are oil, gas, and wood. Electric heat will not be used. We have requested Vermont Gas Systems' review of this Project, and are awaiting their response. It is reasonable to assume that natural gas or LP gas will be used. The combustion of LP or natural gas is relatively pollution -free, and would have a minimal effect on air quality. -1- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 2. Describe any process emissions, noxious odors or sources of noise which will result from the project, and measures proposed for control: RESPONSE: The uses permitted within this area are business, professional and medical offices, light manufacturing, wholesale, storage and distribution facilities, warehousing,etc., none of which are typically characterized by process emissions, noxious odors, or unreasonable sources of noise. However, as actual uses are not known at this time, we are requesting that this sub -criterion be specifically addressed with the Land Use Permit Amendments applications. 3. Describe methods that will be used to control dust during and after construction: RESPONSE: Dust will be controlled during construction by the application of water as conditions necessitate, and at the discretion of the contractor. Upon completion, all disturbed areas will be stabilized with pavement, where appropriate, or vegetation. 4. Indicate the number of parking spaces provided: RESPONSE: We are requesting an allocation of 315 parking spaces, or 15 spaces per lot. 5. If applicable, has an application been made to the Air Quality Section of the Agency of Natural Resources? RESPONSE: Not Applicable. Water Pollution --------------- (A) Headwaters: 1. Does the area qualify as a headwaters area as defined in the statute? RESPONSE: This land is not in a headwaters area because the site is within the Winooski River Basin, and the site is not characterized by steep slopes and shallow soils. -2- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 2. Estimate the maximum number of gallons or sewage per day to be generated: RESPONSE: The total anticipated wastewater design flow for this Project is 9450 gallons per day (gpd), or 450 gpd per lot. We have requested municipal sewer allocation for 9000 gpd. (Lot 42 is not to be served by municipal sewer.) 3. Indicate the type and depth of soils in the sewage disposal area: RESPONSE: The soils in the areas of the proposed wastewater disposal systems, primarily sandy loams, meet the requirements of the Vermont Environmental Protection Rules for the types of disposal systems proposed. See accompanying plans for soil test results and wastewater disposal system designs. 4. If a municipal system is to be used, indicate the name of the treatment plant and the uncommitted reserve capacity, if known: RESPONSE: The Airport Parkway (City of South Burlington) Wastewater Treatment Plant will be used for sewage disposal. This plant is presently under expansion to significantly increase it's capacity. We have requested a wastewater allocation for this Project, and a response is forthcoming. The uncommitted reserve capacity of the plant is not known at this time; however, this plant is scheduled to begin accepting additional flow in October, 1987. 5. Has the connection been approved by the municipality?: RESPONSE: Connection to the municipal system is being applied for concurrently with this application. However, final design of the pump station and force main will be completed prior to installation. b. If a community disposal system is proposed, how and by whom will it be maintained?: RESPONSE: Not applicable. 7. Has Certification of Compliance with Division of Protection Regulations been applied for?, Status?: RESPONSE: Certification of Compliance is being applied for concurrently with this application. B. Describe the stormwater disposal system: RESPONSE: Stormwater will be collected in drop inlets, and conveyed, via storm drains, to a proposed stormwater sedimentation / detention basin. This basin has been designed to provide treatment of stormwater in a manner consistent with the applicable water quality regulations, and will maintain stormwater peak flows at pre -development rates. -4- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services f 9. Will the project involve more than 1/2 acre of paved parking? RESPONSE: Yes. The stormwater management system proposed has been designed assuming 70'% total lot coverages, which is the maximum allowed by the applicable zoning regulations. 10. Is a Temporary Pollution or Discharge Permit required? Status of application: RESPONSE: A Stormwater Discharge Permit is required. Application is being made concurrently to the Division of Permits and Compliance for a stormwater discharge permit. 11. Describe methods of disposal of stumps or other construction debris: RESPONSE: The majority of the site is presently cleared; thus, there will be few stumps. Any construction debris generated by construction shall be disposed of in the City of South Burlington's landfill. 12. Describe method of storage and disposal of hazardous wastes, if any: RESPONSE: Not applicable under the master land use permit. We are requesting that this issue be addressed at time of permit amendments, should any of the individual lots require use or storage of hazardous wastes. C.-WATER-CONSERVATION 1. Describe specific water conserving devices or other practices that will be used: RESPONSE: The applicant is willing to mandate installation of low flow plumbing fixtures, as a condition of the land use permit. 2. Do deed restrictions, covenants or leases require the installation, maintenance, and continued use of such devices or practices? (attach a copy if available). RESPONSE: Applicable deed restrictions will be incorporated. D__ FLOODWAYS 1. Indicate high and low elevations of project above mean sea level. RESPONSE: Elevations range from approximately 232 to 212, based on USGS datum. 2. Indicate name of any nearby river or stream and the elevation of the 100 year flood. RESPONSE: An unnamed drainage way to the Winooski River traverses the site; the 100-year flood level of this waterway near the center of the site is approximately elevation 210. -5- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 3. Will any portion of the project (including proposed fill or storage areas) be located within the floodway or floodway fringe? RESPONSE: Only the wastewater pumping station and portions of the stormwater management system will be located within the floodway or floodway fringe. No lot construction is proposed therein. 4. If #3 is yes, is it likely that flows will be restricted or diverted? RESPONSE: No significant flow restriction will result. 5. If #4 is yes, provide calculations of increased downstream peak discharge, if any. ' RESPONSE: Not applicable. b. Describe any storage of floatable materials in the floodway or floodway fringe. RESPONSE: Not applicable E. STREAMS 1. If project is located near a stream or watercourse, provide name of watercourse and distance from nearest disturbed area: RESPONSE: As mentioned above, a small unnamed drainage way traverses the site. A storm drain outfall is located in this area; otherwise, no disturbance is proposed within 75 feet of said drainage way. 2. Describe any construction which will disturb the stream in any way: RESPONSE: As mentioned above, only a storm drain and outfall are to be constructed in this drainage way. 3. If stream is disturbed, describe methods that will be employed to maintain the stream in a natural condition. RESPONSE: Upon completion of storm drain installation, trench will be backfilled, and disturbed areas are to be stabilized immediately. 4. If required, has a stream alteration permit been applied for? Status? RESPONSE: No stream alteration permit is required. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services F. SHORELINES 1. Does the project involve the development or subdivision of any shorelines? If yes, describe. RESPONSE: No shorelines are impacted. 2. If yes, why must shoreline be developed or subdivided? RESPONSE: Not applicable 3. Describe methods used to retain the shoreline in a natural condition. RESPONSE: Not applicable 4. Describe how continued access to water and recreational activities will be maintained, how vegetation will be utilized to screen the development or subdivision from the waters, and how the banks will be stabilized from erosion with vegetation: RESPONSE: Not applicable Criteria 2 & 3 - Sufficient -Water-and- Existing - Water -Supply ----------------------------------------- - --- 1. Indicate the estimated demand for water in gallons per day. RESPONSE: The estimated water demand for the project is 9450 gallons per day, based on wastewater design flows. 2. Describe how water will be supplied to the project: RESPONSE: Water will be supplied to the project by connecting to and extending the existing B" water main in Ethan Allen Drive. Lot 42 will connect to the existing 8" main in Airport Parkway. 3. If a municipal or existing community system is to be used, provide evidence that the reserve capacity exists for this demand and that the connection has been approved: RESPONSE: We have made application to the City of South Burlington Water Department. We are awaiting a response from said agency, and will forward a copy upon receipt. -7- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 4. If an on -site source is proposed, provide evidence of the location and availability of potable water on adjacent property (indicate location on a USGS or similar map): RESPONSE: Not applicable. 5. If an on -site source has been completed, attach copies of yield tests (except for one lot subdivisions) and copies of chemical and bacteriological examinations: RESPONSE: Not applicable. b. If the project involves a public building or a community water supply which is not a public water supply (less than 10 connections) the information requested in Schedule -D must be included with the application. RESPONSE: Not applicable. 7. If the project is a public building, all of the information in Schedule- E_ Public_Huildings must be included with this application. RESPONSE: Not applicable at this time. Cri ter ia_4-_-Soi 1 _Erosion_and-the-Abi 1 i ty_of _The_Land-To -Hold -Water 1. Describe terrain (including slopes) in areas where earthwork is proposed: RESPONSE: The site is nearly flat, with slopes not exceeding 3%, generally. The soils within the site are primarily silty sands and fine sandy loams, and are fairly poorly drained. 2. Describe soils (or attach Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey Interpretation Sheet, if available): RESPONSE: Soils are mapped by the Soil Conservation Service as Agawam fine sandy loams, Winooski very fine sandy loams, and Limerick silt loams. A copy of the Soil Survey map is attached. ME FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 3. Describe nature and extent of earthwork proposed: RESPONSE: Earthwork proposed within the project area involves the construction of 2300 (+/-) feet of roadway, and underground utility construction, e.g. water, sewer, and storm drainage. No major earthwork is proposed for this Project, as the site requires minimal grade modifications to be developed. 4. Describe the temporary erosion control measures to be utilized: RESPONSE: A stormwater detention / sedimentation basin is proposed for the site; this will serve as a sedimentation basin during construction to prevent sediment from leaving the site. In addition, local erosion control measures (silt fences, and/or hay bale dikes) will be utilized. We have requested a review of this Project by the Chittenden Soil Conservation District; a response is forthcoming. S. Describe the permanent erosion control measures: RESPONSE: All disturbed site areas will be stabilized after I construction with vegetation, or installation of pavement in roadway areas. In addition, the stormwater detention / sedimentation basin will aid in preventing sediment from leaving the site. All storm drain outfalls will be protected with rip rap. In addition, swales with slopes exceeding S% will be stone lined. Individual lots should be reviewed for erosion control design at time of land use permit amendment, so that the particular needs of individual sites can be met. 6. Describe the sequence of the use of erosion control measures during construction if appropriate: RESPONSE: Prior to construction of road and utilities, sediment control measures shall be installed as shown on the drawings. The stormwater basin and contributing storm drainage system shall be I constructed. General site construction may progress; however, the erosion control measures must be maintained at all times. Upon completion of construction, all disturbed areas shall be stabilized, and road shall be paved. The storm drains shall be cleaned to remove sediment, and the sedimentation basin shall be cleaned out and stabilized. 7. Describe any measures or devices that will be used to prevent excessive runoff from the site both during and after construction: RESPONSE: Above described measures, as well as the stormwater detention basin will be used to limit stormwater runoff. Q7: I FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Cr i ter i a-S---Highway-Congest i on -and -Safety -------- - -- - --- ----- 1. Describe the access to the project: RESPONSE: A roadway is proposed to serve the Project. It is designed to City of South Burlington standards, 32 feet wide, paved. This road will connect to Ethan Allen Drive, which connects to Airport Parkway. One lot (Lot 42) will access Airport Parkway directly via a paved driveway. A traffic impact analysis is being prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated, and will be submitted to the District Environmental Commission upon it's completion. 2. Indicate the average daily traffic, existing and expected from the project: RESPONSE: See forthcoming traffic study. 3. Indicate the peak hour traffic, existing (if known), and expected from the project: RESPONSE: See forthcoming traffic report, being prepared by this office. 4. Describe the site distances at the intersection of the project access with the town or state highway: RESPONSE: See forthcoming traffic report. 5. Indicate the speed limit of the town or state highway: RESPONSE: The speed limit on Airport Parkway in this area is 25 miles per hour (mph). At present, no speed limit is posted on Ethan Allen Drive. We recommend that a 30 mph limit be established for this street. 6. Indicate the number of parking spaces proposed: RESPONSE: The total number of parking spaces proposed for each lot is unknown at the present time; however, we are estimating a total allocation of 315 spaces. 7. Provide evidence that the town or state has approved the project access: RESPONSE: The Project is currently under review by the City of South Burlington, which has jurisdiction over the adjoining roadways. A response from the City will be submitted to the District Environmental Commission upon it's receipt. Criteria -#6 -- -Educational -Services ------------------------------ 1. Estimate the number of students resulting from the project: RESPONSE: Educational services are not required, as this Project is a commercial development. -10- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 2. Indicate name and location of primary school(s): RESPONSE: Not applicable. 3. Indicate name and location of secondary school(s): RESPONSE: Not applicable. 4. Provide evidence that schools named above will be able to accomodate these additional students: RESPONSE: Not applicable. Criteria_ 7__- Mun i s ip a l_ Ser v i c es -------- - ------ ------ 1. Check the municipal services that will be utilized: Police - Fire Protection X_ . Soild Waste Disposal __X-_, Water Supply__X__, Sewage Disposal__X , Road Maintenance __X__, Other . --------------------------- 2. Attach letters from representatives of any of the services checked above which indicate that the services are available and will not be unreasonably burdened by the project. (Ensure that the responses from the fire department and ambulance service address the adequacy of emergency vehicle access). RESPONSE: We have requested review and approval letters from all of the above services. The responses are attached, or will be submitted to the Commission upon receipt. Criteria 8 - Scenic or Natural Beauty,Aesthetics,Historic_ Sites,_ Natural_ Area -or -Necessary -Wildlife -Habitat ------------------------- 1. Describe the site (include terrain and existing vegetation, buildings, if any): I RESPONSE: The site is located in an existing industrial park, and neighboring land uses are primarily small commercial buildings and businesses. The proposed development site is presently planted in corn, with some areas lying fallow. As mentioned above, site grades are generally 3'% or less. 2. Describe the proposed landscaping (include numbers, species, size of new plantings, and areas of existing vegetation to be retained): RESPONSE: Street trees are proposed along the proposed roadway as follows: green ash or red oak, min. 2" to 2-1/2" cal., at 60' spacing on both sides of roadway (approximately 67 trees). We are requesting that landscaping of individual building sites be considered at time of land use permit amendment for each lot, so as to coordinate landscaping with the needs of each lot. -11- IFITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 3. Describe any provisions for maintenance of landscaping and other improvements: RESPONSE: The proposed street trees will be in the public right-of-way. After the City assumes maintenance of the .right-of-way, the trees will be their responsibility. Maintenance of the proposed road and utilities will also be the City's responsibility. 4. Describe exterior lighting including fixture type, pole heights and locations: RESPONSE: No street lighting is proposed as part of this application. Lighting of individual sites will be the responsibility of site developers. We are requesting that this item be reviewed at time of land use permit amendment. 5. Describe all exterior signs (include materials, colors and type of illumination): RESPONSE: The only exterior signs proposed for the Project are normal traffic control and street identification signage. A project identification sign presently exists on the site. Again, we are requesting that signage of individual sites be reviewed at time of permit amendment application. 6. Describe building exteriors: RESPONSE: No buildings are proposed as part of this master land use permit application. We are requesting that building exteriors be reviewed at time of permit amendment application, as the color and materials of future buildings are not known at this time. 7. Indicate the location and description of any trash or garbage areas or receptacles: RESPONSE: Expected trash generated will depend upon specific usages. It is anticipated that each commercial lot will have it's own dumpster-type trash receptacle. Review of this matter is appropriate at time of land use permit amendment. We have requested a letter from the City of South Burlington addressing the ability of their landfill to accomodate the solid waste disposal needs of this Project. 8. Describe any known historic sites, natural areas, or necessary wildlife habitat that will be affected by this project: RESPONSE: The Project is currently under review by the Division for Historic Preservation, and a response if forthcoming. The Department of Fish and Wildlife has stated that they do not anticipate any adverse impact on wildlife populations or habitat. A response letter is enclosed. -12- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services ICr i ter i a- 9-__ Conformance_ with the Cap ab i 1 i ty_ and_ Deve 1 opment_ Plan (A)_Impact_of_Growth: (complete only if instructed to do so by the Coordinator) 1. Does the City have a duly adopted capital improvement program (defined as a plan of capital projects such as physical betterments or improvements, machinery, or land, including the estimated costs and proposed methods of financing): RESPONSE: Yes. 2. Estimate the total additional revenues to the town resulting from this project: RESPONSE: At this time we can only estimate the revenue to the City from the proposed commercial lots. Assuming an averaged assessed value of $300,000.00 per lot, at twenty-one (21) lots, based on the City's 1987 tax rate of $2.377 per $100.00 of assessed value, the total tax revenue from this development is projected to be $149,751.00 per year. 3. Estimate the additional costs to the town for the following services: education, highway access and maintenance, sewage disposal, water supply, and police and fire service: RESPONSE: The tax revenue from the Project includes sufficient funds to cover these costs. It should be noted that no educational services will be required. ( H) -&-(C) _--imarY_and-Seconday-Aqr icu1 tura1 _Soi 1s --- - --- ------------- ----- 1. Describe the type of soils (or attatch SCS Soil Survey Interpretation Sheet): RESPONSE: The soils on the site are mapped by the SCS as Agawam fine sandy loams, Winooski very fine sandy loams, and Limerick silt loams. 2. Which of the soils qualify as primary agricultural soils or forest or secondary soils pursuant to the definitions in Section 6001 (8) and (15): RESPONSE: The Agawam and Winooski groups are both classified as highest potential primary agricultural soils; the Limerick silt loam is classified as a primary agricultural soil with good potential. -13- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 3. Describe how the potential of these soils for agriculture or forestry will be affected by this project: RESPONSE: The development being proposed is within the area designated on the applicant's "Master Plan", submitted with previous subdivision application #4C0643. Per findings of fact item #25 under above -referenced permit number, the Commission has found that future development within the area designated on the Master Pland will not significantly reduce the agricultural potential of the Ethan Allen Farm. 4. If the potential of these soils will be significantly reduced by the project, respond on a separate sheet to the appropriate subsections of the subcriteria of 6086 (a), 9(B) and 9(C). RESPONSE: See attachment on primary agricultural soils issue. ( D)-Earth_Resources --- -------------- 1. Describe any mineral or earth resources on the site with a high potential for extraction: RESPONSE: The applicant knows of no mineral or earth resources on the site with a high potential for extraction, other than topsoil. (E) -Extraction -of -Earth -Resources ----------------------------- 1. Does the project involve the extraction of any earth resources (including topsoil)?__Yes __ If yes, describe in detail the site reclamation plan (include alternative use or development of site): RESPONSE: The applicant proposes to remove 6" to 9" of topsoil from the site prior to lot conveyance. 2. Describe how subsequent extraction or processing of these minerals or earth resources will not be prevented or interfered with: RESPONSE: Not applicable. ( F)-Energy_Conservat i on_ --- ------------ 1. Describe site related energy conservation considerations including building orientation, protective vegetation and solar access: RESPONSE: We are requesting that this item be reviewed at time of land use permit amendment application. -14- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 2. Describe all building related energy conservation measures: RESPONSE: This item is best addressed at time of land use permit amendment applications. 3. For large commercial or industrial projects, provide evidence that the structure and mechanical systems conform to ASHRAE 90-80 standards: RESPONSE: Again, we are requesting that this item be reviewed at time of land use permit amendment applications. (G)_Private_Utility_Sr evices ---------- ------ 1. Describe any private utility system proposed (i.e. water, sewer, stormwater, roads, etc.): RESPONSE: No private utility systems are proposed with this Project. 2. Describe the type of surety to be provided to protect the municipality in the event that it is required to assume the responsibility for these services of facilities: RESPONSE: Bonding may ne needed for road construction, etc. Details of this will be presented at or before hearing. 3. Include a copy of restrictive covenants to be used as deeds, or bylaws of any homeowners or condominium association. RESPONSE: To be submitted at or prior to hearing. (H)-Costs-of-Scattered-Developments --- ----- ----------- ------ 1. Describe the location of the project in relation to the nearest existing settlement: RESPONSE: As this Project is located in an area of existing commercial development, it is not scattered development. 2. If the project is not contiguous to an existing settlement, describe how the additional costs of public services or facilities will not outweigh the tax revenue and other public benefits: RESPONSE: Not applicable. -15- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services ( J )_Public_Ut i 1 i ty_Seryice --- ------ ------ --- 1. List any necessary supportive governmental or public utility services demanded by the project: RESPONSE: Public Utilities servicing the project are; Vermont Gas Systems, New England Telephone, Green Mountain Power Company, municipal water and sewer services, police and fire protection, etc. 2. Indicate why an excessive or uneconomic demand will not be placed on such facilities or services (usually a letter from the involved service or utility will be sufficient): RESPONSE: Information has been provided to Vermont Gas Systems, Green Mountaing Power, New England Telephone and the City of South Burlington, requesting their ability to serve the Project. Letters of response will be forwarded to the Commission upon receipt. (K)-Development_Affectinq_Public_Investments -- ------------------------- 1. List any adjacent governmental and public utility facilities, services and lands, including highways, airports, waste disposal facilities, office and maintenance buildings, fire and police stations, universities, schools, hospitals, prisons, jails, electric generation and transmission facilities, oil and gas pipelines, parks, hiking trails, forest and game lands, etc.: RESPONSE: There are two public investments which this Project may affect. Both Green Mountain Power Company (GMP), and Vermont Electric Power Company (VELCO) hold utility easements which cross the site. 2. Indicate why the project will not adversely affect any such adjacent property: RESPONSE: No site development is proposed within these easements, except for a portion of the stormwater management basin, and interim wastewater disposal systems for three (3) of the lots. We have requested a review of this Project from both utility companies in order to ascertain it's affect on their easements. Responses are forthcoming. 3IF-10 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Criteria_10-__Conformance-with-Local_or-Regional_Plan_or Capital -Program 1. Does the municipality have a duly adopted plan? RESPONSE: Yes. 2. Explain how the project conforms to this plan: RESPONSE: This area has been zoned by the City of South Burlington for commercial and light industrial development; thus this Project is in conformance with the City's plan. 3. Explain how the project conforms to the regional plan: RESPONSE: The project conforms to the regional plan as it allows for desired commercial development, thus providing needed employment opportunities in Chittenden County. We are concurrently making application to the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission. 4. Explain how the project conforms to the duly adopted capital program: RESPONSE: Not applicable. -17- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services LIST -OF -ABUTTING -PROPERTY -OWNERS - ------- -- ---- --- -- ETHAN -ALLEN -FARMS -INDUSTRIAL _SUBDIVISION -__-PHASE -3 , -LOTS -22 _42 Note: All addresses are South Burlington, VT 05403, unless specified. Robert and Lynda Shand 5 Ethan Allen Drive Rene and June Berard Box 2039 Jeff and Elizabeth Goldberg 40 Peterson Terrace Tom Chastenay 29 Charles Street J.T Ventures and J. McKeown 51 Sand Hill Road Essex Junction, VT 05452 Stephen and Daphne Hard Box 129 Burlington, VT 05401 Fred and Marion Taft 1893 Airport Parkway Leo and Robert Dumont 14 Duval Street S. Unsworth and K. Martinez Box 4060 F. Naef and R. Volk 4 Park Terrace Essex Junction, VT 05452 Dave and Leslie Barchard 1906 Airport Parkway City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street Green Mountain Power Corp. 25 Green Mountain Drive Bernard and Nancy Ward 5 Shamrock Road FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services LIST -OF -ABUTTERS -FOR -ETHAN -ALLEN -FARMS, -PHASE -3 -(CONTINUED) -------------------------------------------------- Norman Barrett and Fairdale Farms, Inc. 7 Shamrock Road George Brady 9 Shamrock Road Olga Kopystianskyj 11 Shamrock Road Donald and Rose Sutton 15 Shamrock Road Harvey and Joyce Bruner 17 Shamrock Road Allan and Rose Berard 1430 Hinesburg Road Randy Berard 77 Ethan Allen Drive Kenneth and Charles Smith 6 Pheasant Way FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services I 1 � �4 i ♦� Ny +l 1 � V/a "i -' . + 19f �nr "•/ ti ' y, r� � 1:. YY/ ��y ���� J'�C�,f, � �'�� r r� * � � '• � ;���' �1�i 'f CA .�,t�. � k,l f"�► ,�^, ,E � +w. � � 'y t.aHh�ii+v ft•! r.. r�i;+,. r',' >, IV I r a+! ' �r 2\"Nw "6�� • {Mj� t `'� ,�{, .��.lA•d . ; Ay ,��. 3 t .r0• ,.. I e' ndn , ; I ri y �f fi ti .a K� sf:n •� � � Sf (v1�cHael l .� t..r � �, � �'t `� .. � 14 . � h .•1 .� 'f � f�'r�rf � h HIE';'^ 1I, If. 'r • It IVIYU, w, fu 9 Le =1 \ , I. ti.�—, 4gnb qr �/ AgA e. r, � w.... , � ,,I•,.,",�,, }I �'( f t ^ { r9 HI '�..'�, -_•, t� Ia ' / +I,RCDp• i CAA L© t ,.Ialc f Wole �•, �,�, \ ','I Hh I � Fa , •tAdD~ o :" / IsY• ''•: t rt^ o� ` Ilt ` t� • %� /r :* rjf HIB r 't. •a r Gott t ` � ,w+ •, � .'\' �•,�/.: Vie,"I� ��Hhk•' k E' 1 fed` • :Fa �,t, Qa I' Le Wb �y HIB h'r s` °, 'r H( I :Q �'•o� �aG AgJ1 Wo"�* Fu �n tl Y ` ♦ to Wo if 1a'i �o HIB,I Y HID 'Ap11 M913 ti A', 411, It ` IT c S, /�ji'[, IL Ik AdA � F� rL 1 •r, t+ , 1 Ary` �^f � , + VVV . w� '.N.� wa. ' y \\ •(, ����M r 41 AdA y I _ / ) ✓4' f � •Ida 'OVA • t: Ao: . _ ^ VERMON T AIR (% . NATIONAL. GUARD y ' l F..i " �• . f . uq I I l��i i .•+ . A�, rri , •��t,'!.�`y'S �.' Jr" I�� (''h'. ��./ �/ ' � `r' , "i iN F� fir. ` , f ,,, ,,'� 1 a �/� ,:•1"� �� " ` .i f I rw*+r, ��bl t); r ji h41 fi ,1.t I . r � �,� rY11 • ,.... ^ �• tGl •1 n4 I�l i �t�Jn�IMt �) ,,� �X 1,* �� q ,w+^�tr) ,++ r },,F��''tY+tti'I �i �!4, F` + i s M. •��' tt. , GT `1� ` ' y;. \"7� FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE • BOX 850 • SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05402 • (802) 864-5731 July 28, 1987 Mr. James Roeder Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 Re: Ethan Allen Farms Phase 3 - Lots 22-42 Dear Mr. Roeder: IAA JUL" Thank you for sending me a copy of your July 6, 1987 letter and the associated site plan dated July 16, 1987. I have also received a copy of Mr. Beard's letter to you dated July 9, 1987, concerning VELCO's easement area. In general, GMP's comments and concerns are similar to VELCO's. Specifically, GMP has the following comments: 1. Sewage treatment areas: a. Lot #29 - The normal replacement area crosses the centerline of the easement. If used, the finish grade of the area could jeopardize the clearances needed to conform with the N.E.S.C. The line would then need to be elevated. b. Lot #28 - The proposed leach field is also directly beneath the centerline. The finished elevation does not pose a problem; however., necessary travel by utility vehicles could damage the system. Required Changes: Place treatment areas twenty-five feet from and par- allel to the centerline of the easement. 2. Stockpiling of materials beneath live conductors: a. Is not permitted. b. Certain "temporary" construction stockpiling may be permitted with written consent from GMP. 3. Landscaping: a. Vegetation with mature height of 15 feet is recom- mended; otherwise it will be cut when it becomes a hazard. b. Placement should not be directly under the conductor for accessibility to the lines. Mr. James Roeder 7/28/87 Page 2 4. Outdoor Lighting: a. Maximum height should be 12 feet. b. Placement should not interfere with access to lines. C. Horizontal placement will be on an individual basis. 5. Access: a. Must be maintained for proper operation and mainte- nance. b. Fences are not permitted within the easement area; and appropriate gates, etc. must be provided if fences are placed along the easement area. 6. Changes in Grade: a. Cutting or filling within easement must be reviewed by GMP for comments and approvals. b. Costs for changing the lines due to cuts or fills will be the responsibility of the requesting party. GMP recognizes the need for some joint uses of its right-of-way. A variety of uses are certainly compatible and sometimes bene- ficial to the operation and maintenance of our facilities. Our primary concern in these comments is to provide for the continued safe and reliable electrical needs of our customers, both now and in the future. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, U Conrad H. Miller. Manager. of Real Estate CHM/ltr cc: C. Lyons - VELCO Planning Commission - City of South Burlington Act 250 - Essex �rI GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE • BOX 850 • SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05402 • (802) 864-5731 July 22, 1987 Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 Attn: Mr. James A. Roeder Dear Mr. Roeder: FJUL' 2 r- 1987 We have reviewed your letter of July 6, 1987, which requests Green Mountain Power's ability to serve the electrical load for the proposed additional twenty-one commercial lots, part of Ethan Allen Farms industrial subdivision in the vicinity of Ethan Allen Drive, in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. As you know, our comments are required so that a meaningful assessment can be made under 10 VSA Sections 6086 (a)(9)(F) and (J). Green Mountain Power has estimated that the load for your pro- posed project will be approximately 75 kVa per lot. This re- quirement can be supplied from Green Mountain Power's existing and planned generation sources. We have evaluated the transmission and distribution system that will be used to serve your project's requirements and have determined that existing facilities are adequate for that purpose. We do not anticipate that your addition will require distribution or transmission improvements at this time or accel- erate routine system improvements planned for the near future. In view of these facts, we conclude that the proposed develop- ment will not put an excessive or uneconomic demand on Green Mountain Power Corporation's facilities. Details concerning be discussed with trict Office. ELS/ltr service size, scheduling, costs, etc., should Mr. Robert 0. Gamelin of the Williston Dis- Very truly yours, Eugene L. Shlatz Director of Engineering and Maintenance GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION July 24,, 1987 [t ! I `' Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. One Wentworth Dr. Williston,, VT 05495 Att. Mr. James A. Roeder Dear Mr. Roeder: 1987 This is a follow-up to the letter that our Mr. Eugene L. Shlatz wrote you on July 22,, 1987 which requests Green Mountain Power Corporation's ability to serve the electrical load for the proposed additional twenty-one commercial lots,, part of Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision in the vicinity of Ethan Allen Drive,, South Burlington,, Vermont. I would encourage that you forward to us a reproducible Mylar site plan at your earliest possible convenience. It requires up to 6 months to obtain some of the electrical materials to serve a commercial project from the time a commitment is made by you. Even though you may not,, at this time, have all your approvals,, we would like to do our electrical distribution design and quote your costs for its installation. I am enclosing a load sheet that must be completed and returned before a transformer is placed on order. I look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Sincerely,, Robert 0. Gamelin Field Representative Williston Service Center ROG: daf enclosure 14 Merchant Street 128 Atkinson Street Green Mountain Drive Barre, VT 05641 [fellows Falls, VT 05101 Montpelier, VT 05602 476.4133 463.3120 223.5235 22 Main Street 100 South Main Street Route 2A Wells River, VT 05081 While River Jct., V"r 05001 Williston, VT 05495 757.2250 295-3270 658,8000 Mechanic. Street Vergennes, VT 05491 877.2631 Haystack Road Wilmington, VT 05363 464-5208 37019 `V E Is ,.BOX 548 RUTLAND, VERMONT 05701-0548 802 773.9161 • • • July 9, 1987 Mr. James Roeder Fitzpatrick —Llewellyn Inc. One Wentworth Drive IJUL �'� �0 :1987 Williston, Vermont 05495 RE: Ethan All.en Farms Industrial Subdivision Dear Mr. Roeder: Thank you for forwarding the site plan for Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision — Phase 3 which shows some planned multiple —use of a transmission line easement owned by VELCO. This easement is parallel and overlaps a similar easement owned by Green Mountain Power Company. The response and con— cerns contained herein are solely those of Vermont Electric Power Company regarding its own easement and no representa— tion is made of their applicability to Green Mountain Power. The following concerns are set forth for your consideration although many of them may be more properly addressed in re— lation to specific designs for individual lot development. Specifically they are: 1. The mound system replacement area on Lot #39 is very close to the centerline of VELCO's easement and therefore beneath the energized line connectors. If the replace— ment mound ultimately may require significant grade in— crease which would result in insufficient clearance for the conductors, it is recommended that it be moved back at least as far from the VELCO centerline as the initial mound. 2. Some restriction should be placed on stockpiling of materials and supplies underneath the line by potential industrial occupants. VELCO is concerned with the safety of personnel on piles of material as well as use of cranes, etc. to handle such material. This concern extends to stockpiles of removed snow during winter. 3. Although no landscape plan has been provided, we request that vegetation within the easement be limited to species with a mature height of 15 feet. 4. The present plan does not address outdoor lighting fixtures. In general VELCO recommends that they not exceed 12 feet in height. Modifications of this rule are possible upon consultation with VELCO regarding specific instances. ' Box 548 RUTLAND• VERMONT 05701-0540 Mr. James Roeder -2- July 9, 1987 5. The•numerous narrow lots gives VELCO some concern regarding its access to the line for maintenance which is a condition of the easement. When specific sites are developed VELCO will need assurance that fences are con- figured, gates installed, etc. to provide such access. b. Changes of grade (cut or fill) within the easement when developing.individual sites must be referred to VELCO for comment and approval. This comment applies also to the "Future Private Drive" between Lots #30 and #31. 7. Add the words "and utility easements" to Note 3 regarding wastewater disposal systems. VELCO welcomes the opportunity to cooperate with the develop- ers for multiple -use of its right-of-way in a way which will be consistent with safe and reliable operation of the trans- mission system. We find that with proper advance planning the use of the land can, in most cases, be maximized to the benefit of both occupants although the use has changed signi- ficantly since VELCO's facilities were installed some thirty years ago. Please contact me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, VERMONT ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. �, 2eyo Carroll A. Beard - Director Planning and Engineering CAB/pcm CC: D.Watts C.Lyons/250 File C.Miller/GMP 070/6 State of Vermont AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Fish and Wildlife C Iartment of Forests, Parks, and Recreation C artment of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council I Mr.. James A. Roeder FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 Dear Mr. Roeder: DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE H 111 West Street ❑ 255 N. Main Street Essex Jct.., VT 05452 Barre, VT 05641 (802) 879-6563 (802) 828-2454 ❑ RR #1, Box 33 ❑ 180 Portland Street N. Springfield, VT 05150 St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 (802) 886-2215 (802) 748-8787 ❑ RFD 1, Pittsford Academy Pittsford, VT 05763 (802) 483-2300 July 8, 1987 PULE 'i ,3 -1987 I have reviewed your plans and conducted a site visit for the proposed Phase 3 (Lots #22-#42) of the Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision in South Burlington and do not anticipate any adverse impact on wildlife populations or habitat as outlined under Criterion 8 of Act 250. Thank you for the opportunity to review your plans in the early stages. Sincerely, I V"� R. lyllff Thomas R. Myers District Wildlife Manager TRM/tg State of Vermont AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION GENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES EPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 103 South Main Street D partment of Fish and Wildlife Waterbury, Vermont 05676 partment of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources partment of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering and Natural Resources Conservation Council Environmental ERglneerin Stpte Geologist I l .iCX•111,.tLLYa ' July 13, 1987 halati_�;Itu IMr. James A. Roeder Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. (One Wentworth Drive rJUL! 2 198T Williston, VT 05495 Dear Mr. Roeder: I have reviewed your client's (Mr. Belter) site plan for the twenty-one lot commercial subdivision and our files for the adjacent area. The Ethan Allen Drive project site in South Burlington is not located within an Aquifer Protection Area, which is an area contrib- uting recharge to a public water supply, nor do our files show a Class I or Class II ground water area or a Well Protection Zone. However, your request referred to the proximity of the subdivision to an aquifer recharge zone as required by Criterion (a)(1)(A)(v) of Act 250. Criterion (a)(1)(A)(v) refers to areas which supply significant amounts of recharge waters to aquifers. Unfortunately, there is not enough data in our files -to substantiate the amount of aquifer recharge that this site contributes to the ground water system. We recommend that you contact the Vermont Department of Health to determine if they have any ground water information for the area of interest. Your client may wish to conduct a hydrogeologic investiga- tion to answer the question since the burden of proof for Criterion (a)(1)(A) is upon the applicant. However, in our opinion, the issue may be muted somewhat in that the area is apparently served by a public water supply system which does not depend upon local ground water. This information should be confirmed with the Vermont Department of Health. If I may be of further service, please let me know. Si�ncerely�, Dennis Nealon Hydrogeologist DN/ eh cc: Fred Emigh, Land Use Attorney Katherine M. Vose, District Environmental Coordinator Gary Schultz, Director, Permits, Compliance & Protection Ken Stone, Department of Health Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury vbb 8 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF DI: VF:LOPAIIF_NT AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05602 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (802) 828-3211 JAMES A. GUEST, SECRETARY J U 12 2' 4i987 July 22, 1987 James A. Roeder Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 DEPARTMENTS Of Economic Development 828-3221 Housing & Community Affairs 828-3217 DIVISIONS Or: Administration 828-3231 Historic Preservation 828-3226 Vermont Travel Division 828-3236 Vermont Life Magazine 828-3241 Re: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3, South Burlington; Act 250 Dear Mr. Roeder: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above - referenced project. The Division has reviewed this under- taking for purposes of Criterion 8, 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250). David Skinas, on our staff, conducted a field inspection of the project area'on July 9, 1987. A prehistoric Indian site (VT-CH-17) is located on Lot 41 of the proposed development. Based on this information and other environmental and cultural data, other landforms within the project were believed to be archeologically sensitive and we requested the opportunity to conduct a field inspection to identify additional areas of specific concern, if any. In Lot 41, where site VT-CH-17 was located, there was evidence of considerable ground disturbance that may have resulted from logging operations. The degree of disturbance, however, appeared to be more extensive than that expected from typical logging activities. Approximately 12"-18" of topsoil had been scraped -off from this lot which destroyed most of the prehistoric Indian site, thus compromising its integrity. Due to extenuating circumstances, VT-CH-17 no longer contains significant archeological information and, unfortunately, does not warrant further protection or mitigation. Although the field inspection confirmed that other portions of the the project area have moderate archeological potential (ie. Lots 34-37), examination of exposed soils in the corn field and other terrain within the development did James A. Roeder Page 2 July 22, 1987 not reveal prehistoric cultural remains. Mr. Skinas felt that there was sufficient surface visibility to determine the presence of significant prehistoric materials, if any existed. Because of the above findings and especially the loss of site VT-CH-17, we conclude that the proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on any historic or archeological properties that are listed on or eligible for inclusion in either the State or National Registers of Historic Places. Sincerely, DI IS N FOR HISTORI PRESERVATION Eric Gilbe s n Director/Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer EG/DS/gmm cc: Katherine Vose Fred Emigh SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 575 DORSET STREET%!. i�y�urH c:,a"" a to SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 John M. Race, Chic) Q� L---' Telephone (802) 658-10.50 July 8, 1987 ri ff 0 James A. Roeder Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3 Dear Sir: I have reviewed the proposal for the Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision and have no objection to this project at this time. We feel we can render police protection since we anticipate staff•increases which parallel city growth. Sinc rely, J hn M. Race ief of Police JMR:mc Enc. g7(3iB City of South Burlington WATER DEPARTMENT 400 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 864-4361 Mr. James A. Roeder Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 rJU12 !I �987 July 10, 1987 RE: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase III File 87018 Plans Dated February 1987. Dear Mr, Roeder, I have reviewed the above referenced plans and the following conditions must be met to comply with South Burlington Water Department Rules, Regulations and Specifications: 1. A gate valve must be installed at approximately Station 15+50. 2. Current fire flow data must be obtained before final approval. 3. A second set of plans must be sent to this office; one will be returned to you indicating approval status and one is kept on file at this office. Sincerely, SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT Susan A. Messina Superintendent FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 31 July 1987 Ms. Amy Jestes Vermont Department of Agriculture 116 State Street; State Office Building Montpelier, VT 05602 RE: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3 South Burlington, Vt. File: 87018 Dear Ms. Jestes: On behalf of our client, Mr. John Belter, we are hereby requesting your review of this Project as it pertains to Criteria 9(B) and 9(C), of Act 250. The Project, which is located off Ethan Allen Drive, in South Burlington, consists of an additional twenty-one (21) lots to an existing commercial subdivision. The area slated for development at this time is within the bounds of the "areas proposed for future development / subdivision", as delineated on the Master Development Plan previously submitted by Mr. Belter. The Master Plan was submitted as part of Land Use Permit application 114C0643, a previous subdivision of Mr. Belter's lands. Thus, we feel that the development being proposed (Phase 3) is in compliance with the District Environmental Commission's findings in reference to Primary and Secondary Agricultural Soils. (See Finding of Fact 1125, under Land Use Permit 04CO643.) We have enclosed a copy of the Over-all Site Plan, as well as a copy of the U.S.G.S. topographic map of this area for your reference. We are concurrently submitting this Project to Act 250, and anticipate a hearing date within the next month or two. If you have any question, or desire additional information, please contact us. Thank you for your - cooperation. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED d qao--ames A. Roeder. cc John Belter Design • Inspection 0 Studies • Permitting 9 Surveying FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED IEngineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 6 July 1907 Mr. Wilfred New England PO Box 449 Burlington, Irwin Telephone VT 05402 FRE 001PV RE: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3 South Burlington, VT File: e701e Dear Mr. Irwin: On behalf of our client, Mr. John Belter, we are hereby requesting a review by New England Telephone in order to determine your ability to serve this proposed subdivision. This Project, which consists of an additional twenty-one (21) lots to an existing commercial park, is located off Ethan Allen Drive, in South Burlington. At this time, permits are being sought for the land subdivision, and the construction of roadway and utilities; thus, specific building types and usages are not known. However, it is reasonable to assume that small commercial businesses will predominate. We have enclosed a copy of the overall site plan for the Project for your reference. Please review this Project in order to ascertain New England Telephone's ability to serve this subdivision. If you have any questions or desire additional information, please contact us. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED L�tom, a6�Y James A. Roeder cc John Belter Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED IEngineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston o Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 6 July 1987 Mr. Cedric Griggs Green Mountain Cablevision 10 Avenue B Williston, VT 05495 RE: Ethan Allen Farms Ind-ustrial Subdivision, Phase 3 South Burlington, VT File: 0701E Dear Mr. Griggs: On behalf of our client, Mr. John Belter, we are hereby requesting your review in order to determine Green Mountain Cablevision's ability to serve this Project. This Project, which is located off Ethan Allen Drive, in South Burlington, consists of an additional twenty-one (21) lots to an existing commercial subdivision. Specific building usages are not known at this time; however, it is reasonable to assume that small commercial businesses will predominate. 'We have enclosed a copy of the overall site plan for this Project for your reference. A locus (vicinity map) is provided on this plan. (Please review this Project in order to determine Green Mountain Cablevision's ability to provide service for this Project. Should you lhave any questions or desire additional information, please contact us at your convenience. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Y_9� 4 I n_QL— (James A. Roeder cc John Belter Design • fnspection • Studies • Permitting 9 Surveying FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Ingineering and Planning Services Wentworth Drive a Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 July 1987 hief Goddette outh Burlington Fire Department 75 Dorset Street outh Burlington, VT 05403 E: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3 ile: 87018 Tear Chief Goddette: nEbehalf of our client, Mr. John Belter, we are hereby requesting a view of this Project by the South Burlington Fire Department, in order ascertain adequacy of emergency vehicle access and firefighting capabilities. he Project, which is located off Ethan Allen Drive, consists of an additional twenty-one (21) commercial lots to an existing industrial park, �well as 2300 linear feet of roadway, and utilities. The permit sought t this time is for road and site work construction only; building permits will be sought for individual lots prior to their development. tecifics of individual buildings are not known at this time, thus hydrant cations shown hereon are based on typical commercial building types. lease conduct a review of this Project for the Fire Department. ease find an overall site plan and other pertinent construction drawings. We remain available to discuss this Project, should you FTsire. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, IdTZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED James A. Roeder cl John Belter Enclosed so Design 9 Inspection 9 Studies • Permitting • Surveying FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED � Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 Ib July 1987 Mr. Don Hipes Chittenden Soil Conservation District 12 Towne Marketplace Essex Junction, VT 05452 IRE: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3 South Burlington, VT File: e7018 Dear Mr. Hipes: On behalf of our client, Mr. John Belter, we are hereby requesting your review of the above -referenced Project from the standpoint of sediment and erosion control design. We are seeking Act 250 approval at this time, and review by the Soil Conservation Service will be of assistance. This Project, which is located off Ethan Allen Drive, in South Burlington, (consists of an additional twenty—one (21) lots to an existing commercial subdivision. At this time, permits are being sought for the subdivision, and road and utility construction only. The erosion control design at this time addresses this construction only; erosion control design for (each building lot shall be performed at time of individual lot development, so as to specifically address the needs of each individual site. (Enclosed please find an overall site plan of the Project, 40-scale site plans, and pertinent stormwater and erosion control detail drawings. A permanent stormwater detention/sedimentation basin has been designed to I serve the stormwater management needs of the site; this basin shall serve as a sediment basin during construction. Also, local sediment control measures have been shown in other appropriate areas. (Please review this Project for the Soil Conservation District; we welcome your comments. If you have any questions, or desire additional (information, please contact this office. Your usual cooperation is appreciated. incerely, ITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED 0.04� James A. Roeder cc John Belter Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying FITZPATRICK LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED FRE 0 DPW Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 16 July 1987 Mr. Mike Sullivan Gas Systems, Inc. ,Vermont 31 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 IRE: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3 South Burlington, VT (File: B7018 ,Dear Mr. Sullivan: On behalf of our client, Mr. John Belter, we are hereby requesting your review, in order to determine Vermont Gas Systems' ability to provide gas (service for the above -referenced Project. This Project, which is located off Ethan Allen Drive, in South Burlington, consists of an additional twenty-one (21) commercial lots to an existing commercial subdivision. At this time, permits are being sought for subdivision, and roadway and utility construction only; thus, specific building usages are not known. However, it is reasonable to assume that small commercial businesses will predominate. Enclosed please find an overall site plan of the Project, as well as 40-scale site plans. . Please review this Project to determine Vermont Gas' ability to provide (gas service. If you have any questions, or desire additional information, please contact this office. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED ames A. Roeder cc John Belter Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED IEngineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 6 July 1987 Mr. William Szymanski, City Manager City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 HLE GUT11 RE: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3 File: 87018 Dear Mr. Szymanski: On behalf of our client, Mr. John Belter, we are hereby requesting wastewater allocation for the above -referenced Project. This Project, which is located off Ethan Allen Drive, consists of an additional twenty—one (21) lots to an existing commercial subdivision. Mr. Belter intends to construct a sewage pumping station to serve the site, and will discharge into the existing municipal sewer adjacent to Airport Parkway Wastewater Treatment Plant. Twenty (20) lots will be served; thus we are seeking allocation for 9000 gallons per day (gpd), 450 gpd per lot. the or Please inform us as to whether or not allocation is available, as we are seeking City and State approval at this time. If you have any questions or desire additional information, please contact us. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, IFITZPATRICK—LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED ames A. Roeder �c John Belter Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont e 05495 • (802) 878-3000 b July 1987 Mr. William Szymanski, City Manager City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3 File: 87018 Dear Mr. Szymanski: IOn behalf of our client, Mr. John Belter, we are hereby inquiring if the City's landfill can accomodate the solid waste disposal needs for the above -referenced Project. (This Project, which is located off Ethan Allen Drive, consists of an additional twenty-one (21) lots to an existing commercial subdivision. At (this time, permits are being sought for subdivision, and construction of roadway and utilities only; specifics of individual lot development are not known at present. However, it is reasonable to assume small ,commercial uses will predominate. Please provide us with a determination as to whether or not the solid waste anticipated to be generated by this Project will present an undue adverse impact on the City's landfill. If you have any questions, or desire additional information, please contact us. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, IFITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED 0- ames A. Roeder kc John Belter Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED lJ Op Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 3 August 1987 Mr. John Akielaszek Permits and Compliance 103 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 RE: Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3 South Burlington, Vt. File: 07010 Dear Mr. Akielaszek: On behalf of our client, Mr. John Belter, we are herewith making application for a stormwater discharge permit for the above -referenced Project. This Project, which is located off Ethan Allen Drive, in South Burlington, consists of an additional twenty-one (21) lots to an existing commercial subdivision. The site is presently a farm, and most of the land is currently in cultivation. The receiving water, an unnamed tributary of the Winooski River, traverses the western portion of the site. Infiltration was investigated as a means for stormwater management. However, the soils present on the site are not conducive to use of infiltration, due to relatively high silt content. A new roadway is to be constructed, along with a storm drainage system. This storm drainage system, which will serve the vast majority of the site, drains to a proposed stormwater detention / sedimentation basin, as shown on the enclosed plans. The basin has been designed to regulate outflow so that the peak runoff rate from the entire site after development is no greater than the peak runoff rate prior to development. A ten year, 24-hour storm event was used in the hydrologic computations. In addition, the basin has a modified outlet designed to retain sediment within the pond (see details of basin outlet, on the attached drawings). Two small site areas (designated as drainage areas 1 and 2), consisting of portions of several lots, do not drain to the basin, but drain to the receiving water by overland flow over vegetated peripheral areas. Design • Inspection* Studies • Permitting • Surveying Mr. John Akielaszek 3 August 1987 File: 87018 Page Two We have enclosed two (2) copies of the Overall Site Plan, with pre- and post -development drainage areas delineated; a copy of the hydrologic and basin computations; a copy of the U.S.G.S. topographic map of the Project area; a completed application and Schedule D form(s); and a check to cover the $35.00 application fee. We feel that the design being presented here conforms to the applicable regulations governing treatment and discharge of stormwater; however, we remain available to discuss this Project at your convenience. As usual, your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, FITZPATRI -LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED ame Roeder cc John Belter FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services .4TZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 August 10, 1987 John Belter 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Traffic Impact Evaluation - Phase III Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision South Burlington, Vermont FILE: 87018 Dear Mr. Belter: As requested, we have analyzed the potential impacts of the above - referenced Project on adjacent streets and intersections. This Project, as referred to in the following report, includes the subdivision of 21 industrial lots (Lots 22-42) and the construction of associated utilities on approximately 32 acres. There are two industrial subdivisions in this immediate area. The first consists of the first 21 lots of the Ethan Allen Farm Subdivision, and the other consists of 8 lots of the Berard Subdivision. The total area of the two approved subdivisions equals 34 acres. Of those, only nine lots were developed as of Spring 1987, or a total developed area of 11.6 acres. Access to this Project will be via a new looped roadway connecting with Ethan Allen Drive. The study area of this evaluation includes the intersection of Airport Parkway, Ethan Allen Drive and Shamrock Road, all three approaches immediately adjacent to that intersection and the Lime Kiln Bridge, which links Airport Parkway to Vermont Route 15 in Colchester. Three major areas of concern to local and state officials are addressed herein: Traffic Congestion, Traffic Safety and Geometric Improvements. The objective of this evaluation is to identify and assess potential traffic impacts created by this Project in each of the above areas of concern, .for both existing and future traffic conditions. Designs Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying John Belter FILE: 87018 August 10, 1987 Page Two TRAFFIC CONGESTION Information regarding traffic volumes on the streets adjacent to this Project was obtained from the following sources: 1. Automatic Traffic Recorder Count, Airport Parkway - Station D331, Vermont Agency of Transportation, Sept. 5-12, 1985. 2. Automatic Traffic Recorder Count, Airport Parkway - Station D259, Vermont Agency of Transportation, Sept. 5-12, 1985. 3. Automatic Traffic Recorder Count, Ethan Allen Drive - east end, FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated, April 13-16, 1987. 4. Automatic Traffic Recorder Count, Ethan Allen Drive - west end, FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated, April 13-16, 1987. 5. Turning Movement Count, Airport Parkway/Ethan Allen Drive/ Shamrock Road, FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated, July 27, 1987. The results of counts (3-5) are attached as Appendices A - C, respectively. The above -referenced traffic counts were used to develop 1987 average daily traffic volumes (ADT) and design hourly volumes (DHV) within the study area. Growth factors and DHV/ADT ratios, used to adjust the data to 1987 conditions, were obtained from Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAOT) data. The DHV is defined as the 30th highest hourly volume occurring on an annual basis, and is used as a design parameter in the design of highways, intersections and traffic control systems. The DHV typically occurs on a weekday during the P.M. peak hour from 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. Because projects, such as this, are seldom fully developed and occupied within a one year period, traffic volumes are typically projected td a future design year, and conditions also analyzed for that design year. For this Project, a five year projection, to 1992, was developed fron VAOT data. That information indicates that traffic on urban streets in the Chittenden County area, has been growing at an annual rate of approximately five percent per year. The existing traffic counts, particularly sources (3-5) reflect only a portion of the traffic which will eventually result from the development of the previously approved industrial lots. An accurate representation of "existing" traffic conditions requires that not FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services John Belter FILE: 37018 August 10, 1987 Page Three only normal growth be estimated, but also the growth resulting from the previously approved lots which remain undeveloped at this time. Because the nature of the existing undeveloped lots and of the proposed lots are similar, their respective traffic generation can be estimated using the same methodology as described below. The major determinants of the volume of traffic which will be generated by this Project are the type and size of the proposed land uses. Estimates of traffic generation are typically calculated through the use of vehicular trip generation rates from the "ITE Informational Report, Trip Generation, 3rd Edition". That report outlines the results of trip generation studies for numerous land uses during daily and peak hourly periods. Previous traffic estimates for industrial lots in this area have utilized Land Use Category 110 - General bight Industrial. Table 1 outlines the projected vehicular trip volumes of both the previously approved industrial lots which remain undeveloped, and the proposed lots, based on ITE trip generation rates. TABLE 1 PROJECTED VEHICULAR TRIP VOLUMES ITE Trip Generation Rates Undeveloped Proposed Lots Lots Average Weekday Vehicle 1,179 1 Trip Generation (vte/day) A.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation (vte/hour) Enter 217 309 Exit 39 56 TOTAL 25T 36-5- P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation (vte/hour) Enter 77 109 Exit 151 214 TOTAL 228 323 The actual traffic generation of the existing developed industrial lots in this area was determined from sources (3-4). These two traffic counts were located such that industrial -related traffic could be isolated from farm and residential traffic on Ethan Allen Drive. Actual traffic generation was found to be approximately 45.2 vte/acre/day, 4.33 vte/acre/hour during the A.M. peak hour and 4.67 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services John Belter FILE: 37018 August 10, 1987 Page Four vte/acre/hour during the P.M. peak hour. These rates are 86, 38 amd 116 percent of the corresponding ITE rates which were used above. There are several potential reasons for the actual rates being so significantly lower than "typical". First, and possibly the major reason, is the relatively remote location of this area. Contributing to this would be the lack of good access to major highways. Lastly, the nature of the uses which have located in this area have tended towards small commercial/industrial entities which do a lot of "off -site" business. It is likely that the above three items will continue to influence the development of this area. A more realistic estimate of the traffic generation of the previously approved and proposed lots is therefore important in order to prevent over -design of the roads and intersections within the study area. Table 2 presents the vehicular trip generation, based on the observed trip generation rates. TABLE 2 PROJECTED VEHICULAR TRIP VOLUMES observed generation rates Undeveloped Proposed Lots Lots Average Weekday Vehicle 1,017 1,114 Trip Generation (vte/day) A.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation (vte/hour) Enter 82 118 Exit 15 21 TOTAL 97 139 P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation (vte/hour) Enter 35 50 Exit 70 99 TOTAL 105 149 The directional patterns of Project -generated traffic were estimated using existing traffic patterns entering and exiting Ethan Allen Drive. Potential traffic congestion impacts of this Project were determined by performing intersection capacity analyses at the Airport Parkway/Ethan Allen Drive/Shamrock Road intersection, and roadway segment capacity analyses of Airport Parkway. The methodology used FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services .11 Belter :1LE: 87018 August 10, 1987 Page Five to perform these analyses was obtained from the "Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1985". Traffic conditions were analyzed using 1992 design hour volumes with two traffic conditions. The first, without this Project, includes normal growth plus traffic generated by previously approved undeveloped industrial lots. The second condition includes the foregoing plus the addition of this Project. Table 3 presents the results of the intersection capacity analyses. Detailed calculations are attached as Appendices D - E. 1S- TABLE 3 50 AIRPORT PARKWAVETHAN ALLEN DRIVE/SHAMROCK ROAD Ste" DESIGN HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE 1992 w/a 1992 w/ Project Project Airport Parkway SB Left Turn at Shamrock Rd. A A Ethan Allen Drive WB Movements at Shamrock Rd. A B EB Movements at Shamrock Rd. A A WB Left Turn at Airport Pkwy. E Shamrock Road All Movements at Ethan Allen Dr. A A NB Right Turn at Airport Pkwy. A A Highways and intersecitons are generally designed to maintain Level of Service (L.O.S.) C or better during DHV conditions. The concept of levels of service have been defined to represent reasonable ranges in the degree of loading and resulting vehicular delays and average running speed. L.O.S. A represents very low loading with ample reserve capacity and no vehicular delays; L.O.S. C represents average conditions; and L.O.S.E/F represents a street or intersection'at capacity, causing very long queues and vehicular delays. Generally, at unsignalized intersections, the overall intersection level of service is determined by the approach having the lowest rating. Consequently, for the above intersection the overall rating is Level of Service E/F during DIN conditions. In addition to the above analyses, roadway segment capacity analyses were performed at two locations along Airport Parkway. The first Z FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services John Belter FILE: 87018 August 10, 1987 Page Six segment exists between Kirby Road and the Lime Kiln Bridge. The second segment was taken at the Lime Kiln Bridge, which because of its geometric characteristics, further restricts traffic flow. The methodology of the the roadway segment capacity analyses was also taken from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, referenced previously. Detailed results of the analyses are attached as Appendices F - G. Table 4 presents the results of these analyses. TABLE 4 AIRPORT PARKWAY/LIME KILN BRIDGE DESIGN HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE 1992 w/o 1992 w/ Project Project Airport Parkway E E Lime Kiln Bridge E E The results of the above intersection and roadway capacity analyses indicate that Airport Parkway is operating at close to capacity during existing design hour conditions. Those existing conditions include traffic generated by previously approved industrial lots in this area, but have not yet been developed. Even though additional traffic generated by this Project will not change existing levels of service, increased levels of congestion will result. TRAFFIC SAFETY The safety of vehicular traffic traveling to and from this Project is largely dependent on the geometric and physical conditions of the existing roadways, projected traffic volumes, and on the presence of adequate control devices. The accident history of the Airport Parkway/Ethan Allen Drive/ Shamrock Road intersection, was obtained from the South Burlington Police Department for the period of July 1985 to July 1987. That information indicated that ten accidents occured at this intersection during the two-year period. Nine of those accidents involved property damage only. Seven occured when road conditions were snow/ice covered. All but one involved loss of control on the curve of Airport Parkway at this location. The foregoing vividly illustrates that the primary safety problem at this intersection involves through traffic which is traveling too S� fast for prevailing weather and road conditions. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services John Belter FILE: 87018 August 10, 1987 Page Seven The actual accident rate at this intersection was compared to the statewide average for similar intersections. The statewide average equals 0.533 accidents per million vehicles (acc/mv). The actual rate at this intersection, for the two-year period analyzed, equaled 2.23 acc/mv. The critical accident rate for this intersection was calculated to be 1.16 acc/mv. Because the actual rate exceeds the critical rate, it can be reasonably concluded that this intersection is a high -accident location. Intersection sight distances were inspected in the field from the location of the two accesses to this Project on Ethan Allen Drive. Existing conditions are, adequate in this regard. Since adequate sight distances and visibility are important to traffic safety, we recommend that adequate street lighting be provided at the two proposed intersections. In addition, available intersection sight distances were measured at the Airport Parkway/Ethan Allen Drive/Shamrock Road intersection. The posted speed at this intersection is 25 mph. Prevailing speeds, however, are estimated to be in the 30-35 mph range. The recommended minimum intersection sight distance, based on 35 mph, equals 385 feet. Adequate sight distances exist on all approaches except the Shamrock Road approach to its intersection with Ethan Allen Drive. The presence of a crest vertical curve on that approach reduces the S 1 f�59� available sight distance to 330 feet. 'I:: tc C!fzrt - Available intersection sight distances under winter conditions were also estimated in the field. Because of the curve on Airport Parkway, it is possible that high snowbanks could reduce the sight distance between westbound left -turning traffic on Ethan Allen Drive and southbound Airport Parkway traffic to approximately 280 feet. Because of the accident history of this intersection, a flashing warning beacon was installed several years ago by the City of South Burlington. There is, however, inadequate warning signage on the approaches to this intersection. To rectify this condition, additional signage should be installed on each of the Airport Parkway approaches to this intersection. In addition, the existing flashing beacon appears to be ineffective because it does not provide sufficient advance warning. Therefore, we also recommend the installation of hazard identification beacons on each of the approaches in conjunction with the above signage. Based on the above, it is evident that existing traffic safety conditions within the study area are inadequate. Increased future traffic volumes due to normal growth and this Project will exacerbate those safety problems. `7 `(YOQ c 1 ` e CSoOn�> FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services John Belter FILE: 87018 August 10, 1987 Page Eight GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS The results of the above analyses reflect existing geometric conditions within the study area. Current area traffic conditions are such that significant volumes of through traffic are using Airport Parkway to travel between U.S. Route 2 (Williston Road) and Vermont Route 15. Existing geometric conditions on Airport Parkway are inadequate to accommodate those volumes plus the traffic generation of abutting properties such as this Project. Analyses of the turning movement volumes which are projected to occur at both the Airport Parkway/Ethan Allen Drive/Shamrock Road intersection indicate that projected 1992 design hour volumes will warrant the construction of additional turn lanes on Airport Parkway. Specifically, a southbound left -turn lane at Shamrock Road and a northbound right -turn lane at Ethan Allen Drive will be warranted. Construction of these lanes should also include widening of the Ethan Allen Drive approach to three lanes, and reconstruction of the Shamrock Road approach to remove the crest which presently _ restricts sight distances. Examination of the peak hour volume warrant for the installation of a traffic signal indicates that projected 1992 design hour volumes with this Project will not warrant a signal. This conclusion is particularly important, as it attaches greater importance to the above -referenced geometric improvements as a means of reducing delays and improving traffic conditions within the confines of the existing unsignalized intersection. Outside of the immediate area of the above intersection, traffic conditions on Airport Parkway and over the Lime Kiln Bridge are similarly impacted by the high volumes of existing traffic. Given the constraints of a two-lane roadway within an existing developed area, the only option to improve off -site traffic flow will be to widen Airport Parkway to optimum lane and shoulder widths. Such widening, however, will not achieve desired level of service conditions. Geometric conditions of the Lime Kiln Bridge were also examined. This portion of Airport Parkway over the bridge to Route 15 is projected to serve as the route of travel for approximately 35% of Project -generated traffic. The Lime Kiln Bridge is a concrete -arch bridge constructed in 1913 spanning the Winooski River and the Central Vermont Railroad. Because of the latter, the design of the bridge incorporated a rather sharp crest vertical curve. The roadway width on the bridge is 20 feet with no clearance to the guardrail. The most recent (July 1986) inspection report of the bridge was obtained from the Vermont Agency of Transportation. That report FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services John Belter FILE: 87018 August 10, 1987 Page Nine rates the overall condition as a 5 on a scale of 1 to 10. Since the bridge was last rebuilt in 1969, significant deterioration of the concrete surfaces has occurred. The inspection report estimates the remaining life of this bridge to be 10 years. The bridge is rated at 52,000 pounds for single -unit trucks. CONCLUSION This report has evaluated potential traffic impacts resulting from a 21-lot industrial subdivision located on Ethan Allen Drive in the City of South Burlington. The results of the traffic congestion and safety analyses indicate that Airport Parkway in the immediate vicinity of the Project is presently operating at lower than desired conditions. The addition of traffic generated by this Project will adversely impact those conditions. With respect to congestion, however, the impact will not lower existing levels of service. To mitigate those impacts will require the construction of additional turn lanes and associated pavement widening at the Airport Parkway/ Ethan Allen Drive/Shamrock Road intersection. Those improvements are recommended to include the installation of additional warning signage and hazard identification beacons on each of the two major approaches of this intersection. It is also pertinent to note that the City of South Burlington recently signed an agreement with the Vermont- Agency of Transportation for the latter to perform a preliminary engineering study to replace the Lime Kiln Bridge. It is our opinion that the eventual solution of inadequate geometric and safety conditions on Airport Parkway in this immediate area should be linked to the above -referenced bridge replacement. The resulting combined highway improvement project would then better address the 'evolving transportation needs of the City of South Burlington. It would be reasonable to anticipate that this Project may be required to contribute in the form of impact fees to help fund such a future project. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services John Belter FILE: 87018 August 10, 1987 Page Ten We remain available to present the results of this evaluation to state and local officials. Should you have any questions concerning the above, or if we may be of additional assistance, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED -fir• Roger J. Dickinson, P.E. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services APPENDIX A AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC RECORDER COUNT ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE - EAST END FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services LOCATION: ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE — EAST END (FARM) SOUTH BURLINGTDN, VERMONT NON TUE WED THU 4-13-87 4-14-87 4-15-87 4-16-87 AVERAGE HOUR 000-100 2 0 0 1 100-200 C 0 0 0 200-300 C 1 0,`' 0 300-400 0 1 2' 1 400-500 2 4 0 2 500-600 2 2 4 3 600-700` 2 3 7 ` 4 700-800 10 21 19 17 800-900 11 7 19 12 900-1000 7 3 16 9 1000-1100 8 9 17 11 1100-1200 9 19 5 11 1200-1300 8 23 9 13 1300-1400 l2 12 25 . 16 1400-1500 13 8 17 13 1500-1600 8 10 10 9 1600-1700 17 8 12 12 1700-1800 12 8 12 11 1800-1900 6 15 11 11 1900-2000 11 2 4 6 2000-2100 0 4 2 2 2100-2200 0 0 3 1 2200-2300 1 4 1 2 2300-2400 0 2 0 1 TOTAL 80 134 190 98 167 OBSERVED AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME = MONTHLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = ' ANNUAL AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUME = 167 1.01 169 FITZyATRI[K-LLEWE,LLYN INCORPORATED Enginnorinoand Nanning Somicev APPENDIX B AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC RECORDER COUNT ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE - WEST END FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services . , � ' LOCATION: ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE - WEST END (AIRPORT PRKWY) SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT MON TUE WED THU 4-13-87 4-14-87 4-15-87 4-16-87 AVERAGE HOUR 000-100 3 0 0 1 100-200 1 0 0 0 200-300 0 300-400 1 0 '~ ' 0 0 1 2 1 400-500 3 5 1 3 500-600 4 6 7 6 600-700 24 25 38 29 700-800 71 66 61 66 800-900 57 52 75 61 900-1000 37 33 46 39 1000-1100 45 49 49 48 1100-1200 46 68 57 57 1200-1300 54 78 46 59 1300-1400 62 68 68 66 1400-1500 35 65 44 48 1500-1600 46 44 53 48 1600-1700 75 59 60 65 1700-1800 37 40 35 37 1800-1900 10 26 24 20 1900-2000 15 5 2000-2100 12 10 11 11 10 11 2100-2200 2 6 3 2200-2300 1 9 5 4 2300-2400 0 2 2 5 1 TOTAL 295 679 700 382 685 OBSERVED AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME = 685 MONTHLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = . 1.01 � H.m...UAL AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUME = 692 LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services APPENDIX C TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT AIRPORT PARKWAY/ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE/SHAMROCK ROAD FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services DIR PC TO PC T TOT DIR ao 7 J TOT PC T TOT DIR � Iq f TURNING MOVFMFNT DATA SHFET CODE NO.: `7014S FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED PLACE: Sv. uwL_iNk_)&J Engineering & Planning Services T TOT DIR PC T TOT DIR 111C T_ TOT HR ILI Isar -- �-- - -_ - a3- 6 IK N �[ Ll TOT _ TOT DIR PC T TOT HR • __ I b 1500 Moll F" 15 16vo T A 3 x 4 T1 ((��-------�� 4, TOYImm 1 1I I TOT 1 PC T TOT DIR y3 Ai)gwPoq- ALLcn �Al2KwAy �2i �G . M�m ANN _fit V TOT DIR cy 4 a� -► In PC All Passongwr cnri and 2-axle,4-fire trucks LIT OT TOT T = MedLual and heavy trucks and bu»es, DIR PC T TOT DIR PC T TOT DIR PC r T TOT HR u 6 3 9 O 15c� 6�f 87 _ ___1__— ►6vU i TOT _Jlef� TOT I H R I 15CIc 3 i(/Y A I O 10 k Q -1600 .)700 APPENDIX D AIRPORT PARKWAY/ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE/SHAMROCK ROAD INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES 1992 DHV W/0 PROJECT FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.............. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR...............''.....',......... 1 AREA POPULATION...'............''....'','........ 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.....'.''''.''.''.'.' ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.'.''''''''''''..'' SHAMROCK ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST..'''......''...'.'..','''.'.. R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...........''..... 8/06/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED....................''''''... 1992 DHV W/O PROJ. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ ` EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ LEFT 0 7 86 18 THRU 49 67 118 34 RIGHT 50 48 2 0 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE __... .... _..... ... ..... .... ....... .... ..... .... ... _..... .... .... ..... .... .......... ..... ___.... ..... ..... .... ..... _..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ... .... .......... _..... ..... ..... .... ..... _.... ... .... ..... .... .... .... ..... .... _..... ..... ..... ... .... ... ..... EB WB NB SB LANES 1 2 1 1 LANE USAGE L + TR LTR ADJUSTMENT _____________________________________________________________________ FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE _______ ANGLE __________ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND -2.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 4.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00, 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ___________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 10 _____________ 5 ---------------- 0 ` WESTBOUND 10 5 0 NORTHBOUND 3 2 0 SOUTHBOUND 3 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ --------------- WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 EB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 NB 5.00 5.0O 0.00 5.00 MINOR THROUGHS WB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 EB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 EB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF _____________________________________________________________________ -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESITRVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS _______ p ________ M _________ SH ____________ R SH ____________ ----- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 13 593 519 519 506 A THROUGH 120 747 699 > 699 > 579 > A RIGHT 86 975 975 > 792 975 > 587 889 >A A MINOR STREET EB LEFT 0 580 459 > 459 > 459 > A THROUGH 47 746 698 > 823 698 > 728 651 >A A RIGHT 48 998 998 > 998 > 950 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 89 1000 1000 1000 911 A SB LEFT 19 997 997 997 978 Al ' .' 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET...''...'....' 3O PEAK HOUR FACTOR.....'''.,...,...'........'..'''' 1 AREA POPULATION......'.............'.......'''''. 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..................... SHAMROCK ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET...,...'''......... AIRPORT PARKWAY NAME OF THE ANALYST........'.''..''.''''''....... R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 8/06/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED............................. 1992 DHV W/O PROJ. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB __ ____ ____ ____ LEFT -- 0 86 52 THRU ..+- 67 379 281 RIGHT -- 166 0 NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ` __ _______ _______ -------- LANES -- 1 1 2 HuuUMn&m/ r*u/uNm �- 'age-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE ____ FOR RIGHT TURNS ________________ FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ----- --- --- _________________ _ WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00. 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ _____________ --------------- EASTBOUND .... .... ..... ... ..... - --- WESTBOUND 10 5 0 NORTHBOUND 3 ' 2 0 SOUTHBOUND 3 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 MAJOR LEFTS^ SB 5.00 5.00 0.00 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.50 6.50 0.00 ---------- FINAL CRITICAL GAP ____________ 5.50 6.50 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS . p M SH R Si ..... ... ......... ... ___ .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ____________ .... ..... _..... _____.... ... ..... ..... ..... _ MINOR STREET WB LEFT 0 360 346 > 346 > > 718 > 535 RIGHT 183 718 718 > 718 > ` MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 54 813 813 813 ./ 346 > B >A 535 > A 759 A � ~` 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ` Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.............. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.....'........'.'..'....''..'..'. 1 AREA POPULATION..'...''......''.''''.'.'..'...... 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..........'''..'..... ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.......'''',..'.... AIRPORT PARKWAY NAME OF THE ANALYST..............''''..''..'..... R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...'''''.''....... 8/06/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED....'......''.,'''''.'''...'. 1992 DHV W/O PROJ. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ` LEFT -- 153 0 0 THRU ..+- 0 379 281 RIGHT -- O 97 O NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ..... ..... __... ..... --- ... ..... _... ..... ..... ..... _..... ... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... .... _ LANES -- 1 2 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ----- __________ --- ________________ --- ------------------ WESTBOUND 4.00 90' 20 N NORTHBOUND -2.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 2.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV`S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ________ ` EASTBOUND --- --- --- WESTBOUND 10 5 0 NORTHBOUND 3 2 0 SOUTHBOUND 3 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table ______________ 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ --------------- WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS1 SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS ` WB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF _____________________________________________________________________ -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL ` FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS .... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... p _..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... .... M ____.... ..... ..... ..... .... _ SH R Sid ..... .... .... ..... .... .... ..... ____ _..... ..... ..... __..... .... ..... ..... ..... ... ___ MINOR STREET WB LEFT 274 313 313 > 313 > > 313 > RIGHT 0 852 852 > 852 > MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 0 645 645 645 ./ 39 > E 39 >E 852 > A 645 A APPENDIX E AIRPORT PARKWAY/ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE/SHAMROCK ROAD INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES 1992 DHV W/ PROJECT FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET..'......'.... 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.....................'''.''....'. 1 AREA POPULATION....................''.''......... 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......'............. ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.......'''......... SHAMROCK ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST.............'....''''........ R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)....'.'''..''''''. 8/06/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED....................''''..... 1992 DHV W/ PROJ. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEB MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB *NB SB ____ ____ ____ LEFT 0 12 86 31 .. � THRU 79 116 118 34 RIGHT 50 83 4 0 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------- _-------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB .... ..... .... ... ..... ... _ .... ..... .... _..... ... ..... _______ _______ LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE _______ ANGLE __________ FOR RIGHT TURNS ________________ FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND -2.00 90 2(::)N _________________ WESTBOUND 4.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV`S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ___________ 10 _____________ 5 -------------- 0 WESTBOUND 10 5 0 NORTHBOUND 3 2 0 SOUTHBOUND 3 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ --------------- WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 EB 5.50 5.50 0.00 `5.50 MAJOR LEFT& SB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 NB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR THROUGHS WB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 EB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 EB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 /n LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: p="p-� .- __.__ _ -�..,^.� ~ _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... _ _..... .... ..... .... ..... __ _..... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ... ... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... .... ..... _.... ..... ... ..... .... ..... ... _.... .... ..... ..... .... _..... ..... ..... ..... MINOR STREET WB LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MINOR STREET EB LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MAJOR STREET NB LEFT SB LEFT 21 560 473 > 473 > 452 > A 208 735 682 > 752 682 > 374 474 >B A 149 974 974 > 974 > 825 > A 0 511 336 > 336 > 336 > B 76 733 680 > 776 680 > 652 605 >A A 48 998 998 > 998 > 950 ` > A 89 1000 1000 1000 911 A 32 997 997 997 965 A um5 Ium*L I Z Lu Im|MMU(ium,..i Fage-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET....'.'..'.'.. 30 ` PEAK HOUR FACTOR.......''..........'.''''....''.. 1 AREA POPULATION............................''.... 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...'.'''''.'..'''.''' SHAMROCK ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET............'''.... AIRPORT PARKWAY NAME OF THE ANALYST.......................''''... R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..........'....'.. 8/06/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED........'....'.''.''...'..''' 1992 DHV W/ PROJ. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES .......... _.... ..... ..... ... ..... _..... ..... __________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ... ... ... LEFT -- 0 0 65 THRU -- 0 382 286 ^» RIGHT -- 201 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ _______ LANES -- 1 1 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ----- ___ --- ________________ --- -------------------- WESTBOUND 0.00 0 100 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.0T 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND _______ --- ________ --- --- WESTBOUND 10 5 O NORTHBOUND 3 2 0 SOUTHBOUND 3 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ --------------- WB 5. 5(::) 5.00 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS x '^ SB 5. 00 5.00 0. 00 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 ` ~ CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF _____________________________________________________________________ -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p .... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... _ M SH ..... _.... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... R Sid ..... .... ..... .... .... .... ..... .... .... ..... __ ..... ..... ..... MINOR STREET WB LEFT RIGHT MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 0 349 331 > 331 > > 812 > 591 221 812 812 > 812 > 67 812 812 812 331 > B >A 591 > A 745 A ~ ' , 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.............. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR................................. 1 AREA POPULATION.....,....,.....'...''.''''.'...'. 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/.WEST STREET.........'.`'''.'.... ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.....''....''.'...' AIRPORT PARKWAY NAME OF THE ANALYST.............................. R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 8/06187 ` TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.......'.'..'..'.''..'...''.. 1992 DHV W/ PROJ. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB __ ____ ____ LEFT -- 202 0 0 THRU -- 0 382 286 ../ RIGHT -- 0 129 0 NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB .... ... .... ......... ..... ..... _.... .... _..... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... .... ..... .... LANES -- 1 1 1 ADJUSTMENT ---------------------------------------------------------- FACTORS Page-2 ___________ ` PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE _______ ANGLE ___ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ----- --- ________________ --- ------------------- WESTBOUND 4.00 90 30 N NORTHBOUND -2.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 2.00. 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES _______ ________ ________ EASTBOUND --- --- ___ WESTBOUND 10 5 0 NORTHBOUND 3 2 0 SOUTHBOUND 3 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ________ ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ___________ ---------------- WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS ^/ SB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS . WB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 ~-~'-~- - - UHr*Ul/, Hmu LLv��L-ur-BE�v��� Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH .... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... __..... .... _..... ..... ..... ..... _ .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... MINOR STR[ WB LEFT 362 349 349 > 349 > > 349 > -13 RIGHT 0 666 666 > 666 > MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 0 703 703 703 -13 > F >F 666 > A 703 A APPENDIX F AIRPORT PARKWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITY ANALYSES FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 1985 HCM:TWO—LANE HIGHWAYS **************************************************************** FACILITY LOCATION.... AIRPORT PARKWAY ANALYST.........'.... R.DICKINSON TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 8/07/87 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 1992 DHV MISC. INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS........................ 10 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH)....'.'................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.....................'...... .9 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 55 / 45 LANE WIDTH (FT)............................' 11 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 0 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.................... 100 CORRECTION FACTORS -------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN LOS E T E B E R f w f d f HV A 4 3 3.2 .65 __ .97 .... .... .... __ .77 B 5 3.4 3.9 .65 .97 .71 C 5 3.4 3.9 .65 .97 .71 D 5 2.9 3.3 .65 .97 .71 E 5 2.9 3.3 .82 .97 .71 ./ C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS _____________________________________________________________ INPUT VOLUME(vph): 910 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1011 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C � ___ _________ __..... ..... _ A 41 .03 B 164 .13 C 353 .28 D 542 .43 E 1432 .9 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: E 1985 HCM:TWO—LANE HIGHWAYS **************************************************************** FACILITY LOCATION.... AIRPORT PARKWAY ANALYST.............. R.DICKINSON TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 8/07/87 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 1992 DHV MISC. INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS........................ 10 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES.................''...... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH)...................'...... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR............................ .9 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 45 / 55 LANE WIDTH (FT)............................. 11 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... O PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.....'.............. 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS --------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS _..... ..... T B __.... ..... .... _..... .... ..... .... R w d HV A _____ 4 3 3.2 .... ..... .... ..... ..... .65 __... .... ..... .97 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .77 B 5 3.4 3.9 .65 .97 .71 C 5 3.4 3.9 .65 .(T7 .71 D 5 2.9 3.3 .65 .97 .71 E 5 2.9 3.3 .82 .97 .71 ~/ C) LEVEL _____________________________________________________________ OF SERVICE RESULTS INPUT VOLUME(vph): 999 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1110 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C A 41 .03 B 164 .13 C 353 ' .28 D 542 .43 E 1432 .9 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: E APPENDIX G LIME KILN BRIDGE ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITY ANALYSES FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services ` .~ 1985 HCM:TWO—LANE HIGHWAYS **************************************************************** FACILITY LOCATION''.. LIME KILN BRIDGE ANALYST..........'... R.DICKINSON TIME OF ANALYSIS.'... 8/07/87 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 1992 DHV MISC. INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS........................ 10 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH).......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.......'.................... .9 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 62 / 38 LANE WIDTH (FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 0 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.................... 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ` ------------------------------------------------------ ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS ..... _..... T _..... ..... .... .... ... B .... .... .... R w d HV A 4 ..... ..... _.... 3 3.2 ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... .58 __... .... ..... .93 .... ..... .... .... ..... .77 B 5 3.4 3.9 .58 .93 .71 C 5 3.4 3.9 .58 .93 .71 D 5 2.9 3.3 .58 .93 .71 E 5 2.9 3.3 .75 .93 .71 C) LEVEL .... ... ..... .... ..... ..... OF SERVICE .... _..... RESULTS INPUT ..... .... __________________________________________________ VOLUME(vph): 878 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 976 SERVICE LOS ___ FLOW RATE _________ V/C A 35 .03 B 140 .13 C 302 .28 D 464 .43 E 1256 .9 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: E ~ 'ZIP ' 1985 HCM:TWQ—LANE HIGHWAYS **************************************************************** FACILITY LOCATION.... LIME KILN BRIDGE ANALYST.............. R.DICKINSON TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 8/07/87 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 1992 DHV MISC. INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... _.... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... _.... .... ..... ..... ..... .... PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS........................ ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... 10 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES.....................'... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES...'.'.'. 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .............. ............ 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR......................','... .9 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN)....''.'.' 63 / 37 LANE WIDTH (FT)............................' 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 0 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.................... 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS _____________________________________________________________ ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R .... .... w d HV ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... .... ..... _..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ... A 4 3 3.2 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .58 ..... ..... ..... ..... __ .93 ..... ... ..... .77 B 5 3.4 3.9 .58 .93 .71 C 5 3.4 3.9 .58 .93 .71 D 5 2.9 3.3 .58 .93 .71 E 5 2.9 3.3 .75 .93 .71 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS _____________________________________________________________ INPUT VOLUME(vph): 931 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1034 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C ___ .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... A 35 .03 B 139 .13 C 300 .28 D 461 .43 E 1249 .9 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: E State of Vermont ,9/ 414 AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Natural Resources Conservation Council November 2, 1988 John & Joyce Belter 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Belter: Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office III West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 RE: Subdivision Permit EC-4-1183-1; Sewer Line Extension/Pump Station, Ethan Allen Drive, South Burlington, Vermont. On June 15, 1988, our office issued to you the above referenced Subdivision Permit for a sewer line extension, pump station and force main to be utilized by future commercial developments. Condition numbers 12 and 13 of the Subdivision Permit requires the installation of the sewer line, pump station and force main be inspected by a professional engineer. Further, the engineer shall submit a written certification along with supporting testing data to this office stating all. work has been completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans acid the permit. As of this date, we have not received the certification, etc. Projects are now being applied for which are to utilize Vour sewer line, pump station. Conditions of those approvals include no occupancy of the building is permitted until we accept the sewer line, pump station and force main. Please advise us by November 19, 1988 of the status of the sewer construction and when we will be receiving the engineers certification of construction. Should you have any questions, please contact this office, Sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer cc: City of South Burlington Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: JOHN H. BELTER, project in ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL South Burlington to subdivide ) COMMISSION IV a 345 acre tract of land from ) a prey. app. commercial ) APPLICATION 4CO643-3 subdivision into 21 commercial ) lots and the construction of ) SEPTEMBER 2, 1987 2300 LF of road and utilities ) to be served by municipal ) water and on -site septic. ) Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources, State of Vermont, in the above captioned matter. CRITERION 1. WATER AND AIR POLLUTION. Process water should be treated to drinking water standards before it is discharged. This comment would apply to the proposed development of any lot involved with this project. CRITERION 4. SOIL EROSION. The Agency requests that the following erosion controls be included in any permit which is issued for this project: 1. All areas of exposed soils shall be mulched at the completion of work days in which earth work h Xs occurred. 2. All overland flows of water shall be diverted away from areas of disturbed soils. 3. The erosion controls designed for this project shall be equivalent to or reference the "Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites". These measures will serve to minimize the possible siltation infiltration to nearby waterways. -2- I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Agency ENTRY OF APPEARANCE and PRE -HEARING COMMENTS was sent by U.S. Mail (postage prepaid) to all statutory parties. Done on this 2nd day of September , 1987 at Waterbury, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, Agency of Natural Resources by �, C�,(ti � , . ,, Frederic R. Emigh Land Use Attorney cc: All Parties Dear Mr. Dickinson: In response to your letter of May 4th, I have reviewed the above - referenced project with respect to its projected traffic impacts. Planning Commission approval of this subdivision, and others underway in this immediate area, have included conditions intended to mitigate anticipated traffic impacts. Your letter accurately outlines the conditions required of Mr. Belter. The City recognizes that improvements are needed at the intersection of Airport Parkway, Shamrock Road and Ethan Allen Drive. The present alignment of this intersection is poor. Available alternatives to improve that alignment and this,intersection's capacity are limited by existing property patterns and the presence of residences on the west side of Airport Parkway. Accordingly, the Planning Commission required Mr. Belter only to install additional turning lanes. The possibilty of installing a traffic signal at this intersection was discussed, however such a signal would cause additional traffic safety problems which would overshadow any improvement in capacity. The future relocation of Airport Parkway and this intersection to the westerly side of the existing residences is envisioned as a desirable long-range capital improvement. It is the City's goal to construct this realignment together with the replacement of the Lime Kiln Bridge. Both are presently under preliminary engineering study by the Agency of Transportation and Regional Planning Commission. A substantial amount of road maintenance work is scheduled for this year on Shamrock and Poor Farm Roads. Both are to receive drainage work, widening and repaving. Further repairs to Country Club Drive are being deferred pending the anticipated installation of sanitary sewers within the next several years. Overall, the White Rock Point subdivision, as proposed, will not create an undue impact on traffic conditions or upon the City's ability to maintain its roads. With improvement of Shamrock and Poor Farm Roads, the existing street network, including Country Club Drive, will have adequate geometrics and capacity to accomodate the additional traffic volumes generated by this subdivision. Furthermore, it is our opinion that accessing this subdivision by any means other than via Country Club Drive would create an unnecessary duplication of existing City streets. Sincerely, RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on May 13, 1986, the South Burlington Planning Commission granted approval to John H. Belter, Jr. ("Belter" herein) under the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations for a 13 lot subdivision, as shown on a plan entitled, "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision Lots 9-21", dated August 1985, which approval established boundaries for Lot #21 as shown on said plan; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 1987, the South Burlington Planning Commission granted approval to Belter under the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations for a 21 lot subdivision, as shown on a plan entitled, "Ethan Allen Farm Industrial Subdivision, Phase 3, Lots 22-4211, dated February 1987, which approval established boundaries for Lot #42 as shown on said plan; and WHEREAS, sometime after receiving the above described subdivision approvals, Belter recorded in Map Volume 252 at Page 43 of the City land records a plan which was not approved by the Planning Commission and which altered the common boundary between lots 21 and 42 as shown on the above -mentioned plans; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 1991, the South Burlington Planning Commission granted site plan approval under the South Burlington Zoning Regulations to Paul Adams for development of Lot 42 as shown on the plan recorded in Map Volume 252 at Page 43; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission hereby amends the above -mentioned subdivision approvals to modify the common boundary between lots 21 and 42 so that the boundary shall be as shown on the plan recorded in Map Volume 252 at Page 43. Approved this 25th day of April, 1995. City of South Burlington Planning Commission William Burgess, Chair City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 3, 1995 James Knapp Gravel & Shea P.O. Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Lot #21, Ethan Allen Industrial Subdivision Dear Mr. Knapp: T ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I have reviewed and discussed with the City Attorney the issue of Lot #21 and whether its configuration as shown in map volume 252, page 43 is considered approved by the City. It is not clear whether this plat was recorded with the knowledge of the Planning Department, however, the City Attorney has advised that the Planning Commission in effect approved the present configuration of Lot #21 (as shown in map volume 252, page 43) when they approved a site plan for development of Lot #42. Lot #42 is the adjoining property to the north which shares a boundary with Lot #21 and which was also reconfigured when the above referenced plat was recorded. I am planning to resolve this issue by having the Planning Commission formally adopt a Resolution which officially approves the configurations of Lots #21 and #42 as shown in map volume 252, page 43. I hope to have this Resolution voted on at the April 18, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. JityAil ceA eWeith, Planner JW / mcp cc: Steve Stitzel Ray Belair %e7 907 d4A� �) City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 27, 1995 Randy Berard P.O. Box 2039 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Street Trees, Commerce Avenue Dear Mr. Berard: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is in response to your letter of March 16, 1995 seeking permission to substitute other species of trees for the 67 Red Oaks approved along Commerce Avenue. The City approves your request to substitute Honey Locust, Summit Green Ash and Red Maple for the approved Red Oaks. As stated in your letter, the minimum size of planted trees shall be 21" - 3" caliper. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cerel , J Weith, C ty Planner JW/mcp cc: Richard Ward Raymond Belair Randy M. Berard P.O. Box 2039 So. Burlington, VT 05407 March 16, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset So. Burlington, VT 05403 ATTN: JOE WEITH City Planner Dear Joe: Per our conversation I would like to get permission to change the tree species on Belters Road from 67 Red Oaks to a mixture of: Honey Locust Summit Green Ash Red Maple The caliper would be the same size; for example maybe 20 Maples, 20 Honey Locust, and 27 Ash. The trees would be planted in groups so not to mix the species. Please let me know how this would work for you. Very Truly Yours, g'�'4 ;-hq Randy M. Berard PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 September 3, 1987 John Belter 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Intersection Improvements for Phase III Subdivision, Ethan Allen Farms Dear Mr. Belter: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 On Monday, August 31, 1987 City officials met with Lance Llewellyn and Roger Dickinson to discuss required intersection improvements for Phase III of ,your subdivision. After that meeting and subsequent discussions with ,you, I believe we have resolved the traffic improvement requirements to everyone's satisfaction. The steps to this process were as follows: 1) We determined the short'range improvements that are a minimum requirement for this subdivision; 2) We determined the share of traffic growth that is attributable to 21 lots in Phase III; 3) We determined the long range solution and cost; 4) We assumed a 10% city share of this cost and applied the percentage in step 2 to this share. The result will be your contribution to the long range improvements. The following short range improvements are required of you for this development approval. a) Appropriate warning signs at each end of the intersection; b) Right, turn north bound lane on Airport Parkway to allow rights into Shamrock and Ethan Allen Drive. c) South bound. .left turn% t.hrot.igh .Lane on Airport Parkway; d) A stop sign on Shamrock Road (rather than removal of the crest in hill..); r John Belter September 1, 1987 Page 2 These items must be completed before we issue any building permits for these 21 lots. Please submit all signing and pave- ment marking plans to the City for approval prior to permit. Plans must conform with the MUTCD standards. A fifth item, a right turn lane at the top of Ethan Allen Drive, is also required as part of your project but will be completed by the City of South Burlington in conjunction with the planned road improvements to Ethan Allen Drive. In consultation with Roger Dickinson and Craig Leiner, we have determined that Phase III of Ethan Allen Farms will be responsible for 13.2% of the growth in traffic in the ,year 1992. In 1992 without Phase III, the sum of the approach volumes into the intersections is 1137. With Phase III, it will be 1287. Therefore, there will be a 13.2% increase in traffic through the intersection due to this project. The 1.992 figures assume build out of Phase I and II. A number of long range solutions were reviewed by City Officials. The most desirable alternative is a complete bypass of this intersection with a dead ending of Airport Parkway in front of the four houses. The cost of this is estimated roughly at $1.4 million. This assumes: 2000 feet of new road at $150 per foot or $300,000; The connection of Ethan Allen Drive to this new road, a cul de sac in front of the four houses and proper signage at $100,000; The bridge reconstruction costing $2 million split between Colchester and South Burlington or $1 million each. The total $1.4 million should cost the City 10% or $140,000. Your share of this will. be 1.3.2% or $18,480. This fee may be paid on a per .lot basis at. $880 per lot at the time of building permi t, . Finally, the $2.50 per gallon se�,er fee may also be paid on a per lot basis as a prerequisite to receiving building permits. This will also include those Lots that are are temporarily on septic. All of these agreements should be put, into writing and signed by both you and Bill SrNmanski to eliminate any future misunder- stand.i n,gs . Thanks again for your cooperation in this matter. Please call me if ,you have any questions. Sincerely, j Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp cc: William J. Szymanski Sonny Audette Craig Leiner South Burlington► Planning Commission Lance Llewellyn Roger Dickinson Richard Ward PLANNER 658-7955 i 1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 January 14, 1988 Katherine Vose AEC 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05453 Re: Ethan Allen Farms, Industrial lots #21 - 42 Dear Ms. Vose: The South Burlington Planning Commission approved the subdivision of + 38 acres of Ethan Allen Farm into 21 additional industrial -commercial lots. This subdivision is in conformance with the 1985 Comprehensive Plan of South Burlington. JBL/mcp cc: Charles VanWinkle Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner State of Vermont ivision Permit CASE NO. EC-�83-1 APPLICANT John and Joyce Belter ADDRESS 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Chapter 3, Subdivisions This project, consisting of amending Subdivision Permit EC-4- 1183 from eight lots with on -site sewage disposal to 21 commercial lots identified as Lots 22 through 42 of the Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision (Phase 3) utilizing the municipal treatment facility located off Ethan Allen Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4C0643-3A. GENERAL (1) This permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project Number 87018 : SHEET TITLE DATE LAST REVISION DATE 1 of 9 Overall Site Plan Feb. 1987 May 26, 1988 3 of 9 Roadway Plan & Profile March 1987 June 1988 4 of 9 Roadway Plan & Profile March 1987 May 1988 5 of 9 Pump Station Details May 1988 6 of 9 Miscellaneous Details March 1987 June 9, 1988 7 of 9 Typical Details March 1987 August 1987 (for trench detail only) 8 of 9 Typical Details March 1987 June 1988 Prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (3) Each prospective purchaser of each lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. (4) This permit shall supercede Subdivision Permit No. EC-4-1183 dated December 4, 1987, thereby rendering it null and void. (5) A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (6) The Vermont Department of Health is to be contacted in regard to any regulations and/or licenses required by their department. (They may be reached at 60 Main Street, Burlington, Vermont, or by phoning 802-863-7220). (7) This project has been reviewed and the sewer and water line extensions approved for the proposed 21 lot commercial subdivision. No construction on any lot is authorized until complete and satisfactory plans for each lot has been received and approved by the Agency. Approval will not be granted unless each proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. Subdivision Permit EC-4-1183-1 Page 2 WATER SUPPLY (8) The project is approved for water supply by construction and utilization of the municipal water service depicted on the approved plans. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection. (9) The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Department of Health's "Letter of Approval" to John Belter, dated October 6, 1987. SEWAGE DISPOSAL (10) The project is approved for wastewater disposal by connection to the South Burlington municipal sewer system. No other method of wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. (11) The subdivision consists of 21 lots and is approved for connection to the South Burlington Airport Parkway wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 8645 gallons of sewage per day. (12) A professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont, is to generally supervise the construction of the sanitary sewer line extensions and, upon completion of construction, the supervising engineer is to submit to the Protection Division a written certification stating all construction has been completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans. The engineer's certification is to be submitted to the Division prior to the occupancy of any unit and the certification shall include, but not be limited to, the numerical results of all leakage testing performed on each segment of the sanitary sewer extension and all manholes, pump stations and force main as described in Appendix A, of the Environmental Protection Rules. (13) In addition to Condition No. 10 above, the supervising engineer shall provide a plan view of the sewer force main identifying each high point in the force main and final location of each air relief manhole. The engineer shall further certify that the proposed drop manhole has been constructed to provide a minimum inside diameter of 5 feet. Subdivision Pt At EC-4-1183-1 Page 3 PLUMBING (14) Prior to commencement of construction of the building(s), the applicant must submit to the Division one set of interior plumbing floor plans which match the exterior water and sewer services. Patrick A. Parenteau, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Byi,— Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this %S day of j%Uo7e— 1988. cc: Donald Robisky City of South Burlington' Louis Borie Dept. of Health Dept. of Labor and Industry FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. lir r State of Vermont A(�Mivision Permit LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. EC-4-1183 Chapter 3, Subdivisions APPLICANT John and Joyce Belter Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal ADDRESS 2 Country Club Drive / South Burlington, VT 05403 THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ACT 250 APPROVAL UNDER CASE NUMBER 4C0643-3. This project, consisting of 6 lots, identified as Lots 22 through 28 and Lot 42, of a proposed 21 lot subdivision, located off Ethan Allen Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This Permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from. the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to construction. (2) The subdivision must be completed as shown on the Plans Project Number 87018 Sheet 1 of 9 "Overall Site Plan" dated February 1987 last revised September 1987 and Sheet 6 of 9 "Miscellaneous Details" dated March 1987 prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. and which have been stamped APPROVED by the Division of Protection. No changes shall be made to the approved plan without prior written approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. (3) A copy of the approved plans and the Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (4) Each prospective purchaser of any lot of the subdivision shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan, the engineer's site report, and the Permit prior to conveyance. (5) Lots 22 through 28 and Lot 42 are proposed for future commercial development with an anticipated sewage flow from each lot of 450 gallons per day. (6) Lots 29 through 41 as shown on the stamped approved plans are not approved for any type structure, the occupancy of which would require the installation of interior plumbing, water supply or the disposal of wastewater. Approval will not be granted until an amended application has been submitted to the Agency of Natural Resources showing that each lot can properly dispose of wastewater either by soil absorption or by connection to a municipal wastewater treatment facility. WATER SUPPLY (7) The lot is approved for connection to a municipal type water system approved by the Department of Health provided that all construction is in accordance with the approved plans and the Environmental Protection Rules, Effective September 10, 1982. (8) The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Department of Health's "Letter of Approval" to John Belter dated October 6, 1987. Subdivision Permit EC-4-1183 Page 2 SEWAGE DISPOSAL (9) Each sewage disposal system shall be constructed as shown on the APPROVED plan and shall be operated at all times in a manner that will not permit discharge of effluent onto the surface of the ground or into the waters of the State. No construction (buildings, roads, water lines, etc.) that might interfere with the installation or operation of the sewage disposal field or its replacement area is permitted. All isolation distances as set forth in Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 8, Section 8-08, and Chapter 7, Appendix 7-D, shall be adhered to. (10) Each sewage disposal field shall be constructed such that the bottom of the system shall be no deeper than 6 inches below the existing ground. (11) The installation of each sewage disposal system shall be inspected by a professional engineer registered in the State of Vermont who shall report in writing prior to use, that the work has been done in accordance with the approved plans and the permit. (12) This permit shall in no way relieve you of the obligations of Title 10, Chapter 48, Subchapter 4, for the protection of groundwater. PLUMBING (13) Prior to construction of any structure on each lot, an amendment public building application is to be submitted to and written approval granted by the Agency of Natural Resources. The amendment is to include, but not limited to, 2 sets of the final site plan identifying building location and dimensions, location of the septic tank and sewage disposal systems (approved by this permit), water lines from the municipal water main to the building and all roadways, parking areas etc. Additionally, one set of interior plumbing plans are to be provided the Agency to ensure that the exterior sewer and water lines shown on the site plan coincide with the sewer and water pipes exiting the building. Subdivision Permit EC-4-1183 Page 3 (14) The applicant is hereby notified that all interior waste and water distribution plans must now be reviewed and approved by the Department of Labor and Industry prior to construction. This shall hold true for new buildings containing interior plumbing and for existing buildings where the interior plumbing is to be altered, replaced, or added to. You may contact the Department of Labor and Industry by telephoning 802-828-2106 or by writing to: Department of Labor and Industry, State Office Building, Montpelier, Vermont, 05602. Dated in the Village of Essex Junction, Vermont this 4th day of December, 1987. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer cc: Donald Robisky / City of South Burlington ✓ Geoffrey W. Green Dept. of Health Dept. of Labor and Industry FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc. PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JULY 1987 PAGE 3 brought u� to city standards. 3. A record plan shall show a 20 foot right-of-way to the Dewey Irish lot. All legal documents shall be submitted within 90 days and approved 12y the City Attorney. 4. The plans shall show water, sewer. & utilities. A sewer allocation of 1350 gpd shall be made and a fee of $2.50 per gallon shall be paid prior to permit. 5. A final plan must be recorded with the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void: The plan must be approved by the City Planner and signed 12y the Chairman of the Planning Commission prior to recording. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed 5-0, Ms. Pugh abstaining. 3. Public Hearing. Preliminary Plat application of John J. Belter, Jr., for a 21-lot commercial subdivision on 52.4 acres of Ethan Allen Farms During the discussion on this item, Mr. Belter stepped down from the Commission. Mr. Llewellyn explained that there will be a new road off Ethan Allen Drive to access 19 of the lots. One lot will access from Airport Parkway and one off Ethan Allen Dr. Water will be public. Catchbasins and stormsewers will handle stormwater which will then enter the drainageway. Lots 22-29, 39, and 42 will have on -site sewage disposal. Ms. Perkins said that Mr. Szymanski has agreed to this. The remaining lots will be hooked to the city sewer prior to permit. Once the sewer is extended, the remaining lots will be required to hook up. Mr. Sutton, a resident of the area, said he is concerned that the flow of traffic will increase even more. The present lots have already increased traffic which has no regard for resident traffic in the area.. He also said the stress on Lime Kiln Bridge is a problem. Ms. Perkins noted that a traffic study will be required. Mr. Sutton said that Shamrock Drive has been ruined because of truck traffic on it. Mr. Brady said there is a wetland on the southeast corner with teal and wood duck. It is the last wetland left in the area and he asked what would happen to it. Mr. Belter said that is part of the drainageway that serves Air Guard Road and will stay the way it is. Mr. Brady then asked if future generations will be better served by keeping the land agri- cultural or by making building lots. Mr. Jacob said that has PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JULY 1987 PAGE 4 no bearing on this hearing and that Act 250 will consider that question. Mr. Brady then asked what will happen to the trees on the east side of Shamrock Rd. in front of the Sutton house. Mr. Belter said most of the trees are on the steep bank and he saw no reason to cut them down. Mr. Llewellyn then presented the landscaping plan. There will be street trees every 60 feet. These will be green ash or red oak of 2 to 2-1/2" caliper. In answer to the questions in Mr. Szymanski's memo, they will provide a stub at Manhole #9, also a stub at the previously approved lots on the north side of the new'street, also in manhole 1-b. Residents asked whether the sewer will be extended to Country Club Estates. Mr. Jacob said they will be a lot closer now. Mr. Belter said it is in the city's 5-year master plan to extend the sewers to Country Club Estates. Mr. Llewellyn noted the pumping station can be expanded to serve Country Club Estates. Mrs. Maher questioned the central mailbox location. Mr. Belter said he didn't particularly like it and will check with the Post Office to see if it is necessary. Ms. Perkins said She will also check for general Planning Commission information. Members agreed to discuss the sidewalk question at final plat. Mr. Belter noted the city might want to put in the sidewalk on Ethan Allen Dr. when they redo it. Mr. Jacob said the Commission should discuss the general question of sidewalks for industrial developments. Mr. Llewellyn noted that the actual acreage is 38, not 52. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of John Belter for a 21 lot subdivision on 38 acres, as depicted on a set of plans, the first page entitled "Ethan Allen Farms Industrial Subdivision Phase 3, lots 22-42, overall site plan," prepared bv Fitz- patrick -Llewellyn, Inc, dated February 1987, last revised July 1, 1987, with the following stipulations: 1. Sewer manhole #9 should have an 8" stub northerly. 2. Previously approved lots along the north side of the new street shall have sewer stub provided. 3. Additional inlets shall be provided. PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JULY 1987 PAGE 5 4. A stub in MH 1-B shall be provided so that the line can be extended. 5. An association of landowners shall be responsible for the maintenance of the off -site holding ponds and drainage lines. 6. Hardwood street trees, 60 feet on center, shall be planted on both sides of the new road. Bonds for streets and land- scaping shall be posted rp for to permit. 7. A traffic study shall be completed and reviewed by Craig Leiner prior to Final Plat approval. 8. Lots 22 through 28 and 42 shall be approved with on -site sewer systems and the rest (29 through 40) must be hooked u� to City sewer prior to issuance of building permit. The on site sewer system shall be designed so as to be able to hook into City sewer when it is extended. 9. The street shall be built to City standards. The developer shall furnish the City with the name of the con- tractors doing the work, and the architect engineer's name who will stake out and supervise the work within 7 days prior to beginning of road construction. Upon completion of the work, the architect and/or engineer shall certify that the work is in conformance with the approved plans, stipula- tions and any other requirements and/or changes that the City requests. 10. The existing trees along Shamrock Rd. bordering on lot 41 for a depth of 15 feet shall not be removed. 11. The private drive serving lots 39 and 40 shall be 24 feet wide within a 50 foot right-of-way. 12. The Final Plat application must be submitted within 12 months or this approval is null and void. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Following the vote, Mr. Belter resumed his seat on the Commission. 4. Site plan application of 3060 Associates, Inc., to con- struct a 5,000 sq. ft. addition to an existing 15,000 sq. ft. building and an 8400 sq. ft. building for storage/dis- tribution at 3060 Williston Rd. Mr. Dugan noted that the building in which Explorer RV is now PLANNING COMMISSION 10 MARCH 1987 PAGE 4 the Commission was to increase the size of the trees. Mr. Anderson noted he would like to keep the sidewalk for cus- tomer convenience. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Charles Anderson & Albert St. Amand for construction of a 9600 sq. ft. commercial -warehouse building as depicted on a plan entitled "59 Swift Street:Anderson St. Amand, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared �y Michael Dugan, dated February 25, 1987 with the following stipulations: 1. A $4950 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. The plan shall be revised to reflect this amount and shall be approved by the Planner prior to permit. The plans should show any existing large trees at the rear of the lot. 2. A site drainage plan shall be submitted to the City En- gineer for approval prior to permit. 3. Plans shall be revised to show where pavement will be and where curbs will be constructed. 4. A 75 gpd sewer allocation is granted in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy. The $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. 5. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mrs. Maher seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 6. Sketch plan application of RPM Development (Paul Marquis) for a 2-lot subdivision of an 80,822 sq. ft. lot, 5 Gregory Drive Mr. Hirt noted one lot will be 40,364 sq. ft. and the other 40,458. A driveway will be split between the 2 lots. There will be only 1 curb cut. The Commission has already approved a building for one lot. Mrs. Lafleur said the plan meets all requirements, setbacks, etc. 7. Sketch Plan application of John Belter for subdivision of 32.2 acres into 21 industrial -commercial lots located on Airport Parkway and Ethan Allen Drive Mr. Belter stepped down during this discussion. Mr. Belter noted there will be anew street, 32 ft. wide which will be a city street with curbs. Mrs. Lafleur added that all lots except 2 are south of Ethan Allen Drive. Mr. Belter PLANNING COMMISSION 10 MARCH 1987 PAGE S will bring the sewer in to serve these lots. Land has been provided for a pump station. The question of improvements to Ethan Allen Drive was raised. A note will be sent to the City Council emphasizing the importance of reconstruction of this intersection. Mrs. Lafleur noted that 2 lots have no frontage but are served by a right-of-way. Mr. Belter said there would be a private drive to these lots. Concensus of the Commission was that a 40-foot right-of-way would be adequate. Mrs. Lafleur also noted that the new road lines up with Lime Rock Rd. Street trees are part of the subdivision require- ment. Members asked what the status of National Guard Rd. is. Mrs. Lafleur will check on this. 8. Sketch plan application of A & G Investments, Alan Bartlett and Gerry Milot for a planned unit development consisting of 99 single family lots, 80 attached units in 21 buildings; 2 acre parcel with the existing farm house and 68 acres of open space at the former Brand Farm, 900 Dorset St. Mr. Caulo said that over the past 14 months they have been discussing with the City a proposal to allow the city use of part of the parcel for a major city park. The land will thus be subdivided into 3 parcels: existing farmhouse, 68 acres for open space for the park, and 180 single family and multi- family units. The development will be clustered on the rear portion of the lot. They propose that a city street extend to the treeline where the residential units would be. It would be difficult to align perfectly with Swift St. because of the Calkins piece of property. If that can be acquired, the streets would align perfectly. Mrs. Lafleur said the Commission might want to waive putting curbs on the 'DUctintoc the development so that if the Calkins property is gotten by the developer or the city, the roads can then be properly aligned. The development work will attempt to conform with the general topography, with streets aligned with gradients. There will be 99 0-lot line lots of approximately 6,000 sq. ft. and 80 multi -family units in 21 buildings. They have been asked by the State to preserve the area designated as a wetland by the State and are working to develop a system that will maintain the quality of the water. Mr. Caulo said they would like the roads serving the condos to be private. Mrs. Maher objected strongly to this. She felt residents would soon be petitioning the City to maintain them. Mr. Caulo said they had no problems designing the t.4 cpUa, iWW..t-n l&f-A-4 t Ara , mi v l �ria,�t (,st i sad D V� 50 )o m� C� l 04 . f &A� 13 . a°6 LY� & < �ollo n Lu" &4 .- CU4;) w t k ml ft6 L&o� fst- �' 50. a00, o azz DO, 00.1-N 'Dr, n ru.zheA, -rww'A'v nc9 1 5 ► 5 r-a-50- I (9 S LLAJO-I I - oI-L AD 0 SCLUCA - � /it �- m s►t_ t� -. l _ a %S� = v LUC Tl -uT-3c'*k 14w (M 4:p�a 0Ic" -cw - L9-)�l Az �eN Lv 97A In Q►U Imo- �*U^ ."t-�- v�)�. �`b. �n K L" ey\ :S+DP vY-\ 3k0 ,n1N C � 5(T- 0 * vnk1-f11 irk L-.)) ' Ile LttbA 40 - InCol f° , D�a 15 1�� "-6atv, 1 I . S l oiferrccu �gAtx� AAY�6-L� &OLA �b &-&& ey�, CV w X�v � -):Sy- - -� 12 �0( TAIP cz:�Vvs 4 5-3 6SMVrzv `7 ---) (�4 �Y3 3 -Eit, '15, q '-I) � I --- --- ---- -3 ems, ( It 1, 3 - y 4 8 - --- T -- 7604 a/u, ui, 6 Y-"Ji • 1 �_ __ nw�►E = as,a X 4540 x _0. 0'7'� 14��OU .- r ----� �� vre/$A>l i A, m. ?N vj-e. - as . 2 x 43,56 U x v. u `1 S xIV vv i.3a� iQ{�_---- t 6 ✓T�NUN�--- —^ — --i �' �1. PH = �a_2 x y3,5� 0.0175 x 1.y3/1000— � fi 4 ty Ile, V a 13 ya --� - A w v i E __ 3 3--d _ y 3,._560 x 0. 07 5 k ly JUUv__ = /� 5 / q 1r_ DAY _ l3�_,'--A. nL -PH U i G = 33.2 x W -3 x_Q, U'7 t J. 3IIvUUvrc/i✓�uR— j + T,r _'P/avTc 33, a '� a3i._56� x U_U S ►� /, �13�l�U�- -- � 5 _ " /���r�—_ Use` �$ �1�T--------------- —--------- "kf �a � - -- A - - - -------- Rvel-D C-0 4vDF-VCL0?W0 Ppaovc-,o �Ors /73 'e q3,540 x I? x 1 q /0( !7 VrCJHUVg Lil. 56 0 % -K SHAmgtUUlf 'Ru r') 'J Cj')4h J A LUGN 'DR, vG G 7' 189 ,�pPno��cN Uou��r�ES t 1,13 '1 A)-DrROvc--J Lo ► S �►�r�mRoC'< Rca�o � �T14AJ rJl.l.Gr�1 'DR, vC 3a5 ra-�ri��aca I aw'l ('u�oV m�n91 a� la°� Inc. $ �,�,�, --+� l�•y-per �� w �� C-S/ ekDe & - (&�t ( NUT 5F trol ce" e'T?'Y) IZICE ie f 7SNAw-tp,t3c..k T;�-QAD . . ........... . . ........ �370I9 cvc ✓1 N �1T� 1 5U a4 N MEW WNri /7Na EI IVOIx �LIGIQNI�iC- I � f P I r jI I _ �h '7 �Y. �,�•r7'G'�+S / _ �O_l _ 1, �� r ` * M �'�� �,. le, Air` U NS WOR T r ���, Bj.Q.4fC0 Fip•CN ., - � T •` •r/ xr f r `•.� 1 LOT O Zir'F Cf•��•` r, .� .•' i : r 1, e. • r ti�4. - �,;1 -r_. ,34.' -•r �.� :JCLAc, .�?� +'•�.^^ O .1l rf� v � f��r � T � �1 � ♦ t � �t r ��t •1 .�j. 'ry�� ' .f��� } 1•� rf ~r . r}"►ir6 1 '-. r �%�. .. y.• e ` � 12f sf 4 � 2 �tiv � �.: fr�r•y ,-�,�tif ; r t�#" s� �l3•ii 'rr yQ K ►!n% , r , , A t 1 �•� r� L 'f • ;, r 1. t �,� •� i f \�T/ t ,w�• .� , t_ L fit; . C t. riti!• '!•� .�t Tie'{' ; r• f ' � � - ' .r' �rrit1'• . � � r ' �j'g�1�-r.� 'S� t: � .r • � f� .of •ti, •�r._r� _ l } (�C /�/ '• } r •, ltti'^ YS. r` ; 1• I`.. . 7:1-��7 '�/♦ j;> •��,f5 r� :, l'-'' {R rr �Z+#�t.!•i.}� 'S A��y ,s +f+Y L �2l i ��} � 'wi S'. L: t � J ail a �� •.��;• i' .'• r�,'^���ry r� fiij iit�•s'31'�} yw ''' ` ,. •YF ttit.' �• yA ,� �„��''�f \`r?'�i �.K+C �#;�e \ , 7..c u. :.�-��- .-_._ - � _ 9J r. fir• .�, 7j ry + „i.. w} r^ o-i s•iJlj. �e*Q � ;h i, � s{ "(-.-sti - _'�" .'•<.._. _rf r Y A s - 1{ �r �~' -:�.T •„P �..r �3 t C ` - � +' ` 1 >} i �'`':�t:+�• '�7f rf Via' }r� . . y �'t•"�''��r,. t 1 fi � Yt > . !'�}> - r.• f Y y�,. y r, ,! •2 '�4 i -r ►�"�e[a •Sr�yt �:�,. } � F •v j+'i' • � :� y'• �. , j, ! f•• ��.., C ;"ryvr '1 • ��.F+ (Y�HBf{/�r, . i ,'� �•,v, y rr � [� rr ;,w�i. 7fy� . r I �, 7�'' �r t"iY r r � � � •f •Ri_r.t'�'r +elT ,�' t r •.1 1 r�' "f7F L 1� r �l�� t r • r•' .•� il`'' {;/� '� r t. 5)Jo St Michael o ege Cem ` CP,m NNW 1 1 Llme Klin rN e u Q a r r ; 1 �--- ERMOf Quarry / 0.;. soo . • ; "_�, ` sage 0 ' I N AT i off] jam(\& Vwolvt-a �1% Qrfw►ovs S�'6o���s�a�n ��`. SU%'DV \S\O�,\ + p, a C w 1 `• -- • - � �ogdl �ronn ( l /9 lI t— ti�� iOS `rf `'J f2f AN �, ,� � f �,^,�iR M��.Ir , l8 PLAN' SCALE ioo so SCALE l = 200'