Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCU-03-07 - Supplemental - 0015 Lindenwood DriveDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 16, 2003 Tim Clark 15 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Clark: Notice of Decision Conditional Use CU-03-05 Front Porch - 15 Lindenwood Drive Enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board's (DRB) Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision for your front porch to extend 2 ft. beyond the limit set forth in the Zoning Regulations and the proposed Land Development Regulations. The DRB's approval is subject to the 2 conditions listed on page 3 of the enclosed decision. Accordingly you must obtain a zoning permit before October 16, 2003. If you have any questions concerning this approval, please call the Planning and Zoning Office. Sincerely yours, Janet M. Hurley Associate Planner /jmh enc. \drb \m isc\cla rk\C U-03-07. cor. doc CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD \d rb\m i sc\dark\porch . s rp. d o c DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: April 10, 2003 Plans received: March 11, 2003 CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-03-07 FRONT PORCH — 95 LINDENWOOD DRIVE Meeting date: April 15, 2003 Owner/Applicant Tim Clark 15 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Location Map Property Information Tax Parcel 1050 00015 R R4 District ±0.64 Acres ON CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\clark\porch srp doc Tim Clark, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting conditional use approval for a front porch at 15 Lindenwood Drive to extend 2 ft. beyond the limit set forth in Section 25.118(h) of the Zoning Regulations and Section 3.06 of the proposed Land Development Regulations. The subject property contains approximately 0.64 acres and falls within the Residential 4 (R4) District. COMMENTS Associate Planner Janet Hurley and Administrative Officer Raymond Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the Site Plan submitted on March 11, 2003, and have the following comments. Staff notes that the proposal must comply with both the Zoning Regulations and the proposed Land Development Regulations, Section 25.118 of the Zoning Regulations establishes criteria for exceptions to yard setback requirements. Section 3.06(J) of the proposed Land Development Regulations establishes the same criteria. EXCEPTIONS TO YARD SETBACKS Exceptions to setback requirements shall be permitted for single family lots that were in existence prior to February 28, 1974. In addition, exceptions to front setback requirements must meet the following criteria. (a) A structure may encroach into a required front setback up to the average front setback of principal structures on adjacent lots on the same street frontage, but in no event shall a structure have a front setback of less than 5 feet. The applicant has provided information indicating that the average front setback of residences on adjacent lots is 25.6 feet. The proposal involves a proposed front setback of 22.9 feet. Consequently, the criteria set forth in the next paragraph apply to this proposal. (b) Additional encroachment of a structure into a required front setback may be approved by the DRB subject to the provisions of Article 12, Conditional Uses, but in no event shall a structure be less than 5 feet from a front property line. In addition, the DRB shall determine that the proposed encroachment will not have an undue adverse affect on: (i) views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; (ii)access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; (iii) adequate on -site parking; and (iv) safety of adjoining and/or nearby property. The proposal involves an additional encroachment of 2 feet beyond the existing 24.9 ft. front setback on the subject property. This new encroachment will consist of a portion of the front staircase, which will be 11 ft. wide. This will not affect the view, access to sunlight, or safety of adjoining or nearby properties. (c) Any request to expand an existing structure, or place a new structure, to within less than 10 feet of any property line shall include the submission of survey data prepared by a licensed surveyor showing the location of affected property lines, existing and/or proposed structures, and any other information deemed necessary by the Administrative Officer. The proposal does not involve expansion of a structure to within 10 feet of any property line. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\clark\porch srp doc CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA The DRB must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. Staff believes that the proposal will not adversely affect municipal services. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff believes that the proposal is in keeping with residential uses on surrounding properties and will not adversely affect the character of the area or the ability to develop adjacent properties. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposal will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. The proposal is in keeping with applicable regulations. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposal will not affect renewable energy resources. (f) General public health and welfare Staff does not believe that the proposal will have an adverse affect on general public welfare RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve this conditional use application front porch at 15 Lindenwood Drive to extend 2 ft. beyond the limit set forth in Section 25.118(h) of the Zoning Regulations and Section 3.06 of the proposed Land Development Regulations, subject to the following conditions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted to the DRB dated March 11, 2003. 2. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months of this decision. Respectfully submitted, Janet M. Hurley, Associate Planner Copy to: Tim Clark, Applicant I�W'bvtfoe %4O Fk- 8A `Eg EctS�t�A Ott. cry Calk CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT,05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 11, 2003 Tim Clark 15 Lindenwood Drive 5. Burlington, Vermont 05405 Re: 15 Lindenwood Drive Dear Mr. Clark: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Flease be Sure that Someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April 15, 2003 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset 5treet. Sincerely, -a Raym nd J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 11, 2003 Dan & Beth Colligan 17 Lindenwood Drive 5. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear property Owner: Enclosed io a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This io being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing io being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106 or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely,' Raymond J. 6elair Administrative Officer End. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 11, 2003 Bob Marlowe 13 Lindenwood Drive 5. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the 5urlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being Sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 646-4106 or attend the Schedule public hearing. Sincerely? Kaymond J. 5elair Administrative Officer Encl. � I PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a .public hearing at the South Sur- lington City Hall, Confer - once Room, 575 Dorset Street,. South Burlington, Vermont on -Tuesdayy April 15., 2003, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: 1. Preliminary plat application #SD-03=16 of Marie Dubois to subdi- vide a_- 5.06 acre parcel into six (6) lotsand boundaryline adjustment between 79 Butler Drive (lot #68) and the, lot to be subdivided, "Butler Drive. 2 Application #CU-03-06 of Amy E. Vaudreuil seeking-, condi- tfonal ' use approval under _Section 26.05, ' Condi- tional Uses,. of the cur gent zoning regulations and under Section 14.10, Conditional` Use Review: General Provisions and Standards, of the pro- posed Land Development i Regulations. . Request: is r for permission for an ac. cessory residential unit, 78 Oakwood Drive. 3. Application #CU-03-07 of Timothy H. Clark seeking condi- tional use approval under Section 26.05, Condi- tional Uses, of the cur- rent zoning regulations and under Section 14.101 Conditional Use Review: General Provisions and Standards, of the pro- posed Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to allow a front entry to extend two (2) feet beyond the ,limi- tations set forth in Sec- tion 25.118 (h) of the current zoning regula- tions and Section 3.06 (J) (2) of the proposed Land Development Regu- lations, 15 Lindenwood Drive. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Review Board March 29, 2003 Permit Number (, U - a3 - 0-7 APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month . That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY Seaf6' ► ZS : I I f?(06) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? J1 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) /) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) SPA *k 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) See :* I 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1 S Lrn)4.,wbm) C) —we- 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 10a-10 �C�Q 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION nn -- a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 1� ae l&k JJML I n ,k b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) VAS% S©uaQ apf d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildingsandexiing (sttin builds to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) ' S6A RAMCGr' kdVS wI -V- Ye -U0 (an CY a19- e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 6 kre- f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically reque ted above ease note if Overlay Districts are applicable): A- N or�i" T. bewwh -SPC%nt Z,s�i to Oo� 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 6 ,'A % Proposed Sc i % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 1 % Proposed `l. % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % (does not apply to residential uses) 2 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 15Ub .ry b) Landscaping: $ Q N c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Doti 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I1-wde'Wob ofo>- 0-mo ( B-Itx for 1 Jrr� 3 I stud ems. wTr� D ve got tawf- 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT �Av �1' a SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: P"Complete ❑ Incomplete W/ I /0 Director of Pkahing & Zoning or 4