Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCU-03-07 - Decision - 0015 Lindenwood DriveCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FRONT PORCH — 15 LINDENWOOD DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-03-07 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Tim Clark, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting approval for a front porch at 15 Lindenwood Drive to extend 2 ft. beyond the limit set forth in Section 25.118(h) of the Zoning Regulations and Section 3.06 of the proposed Land Development Regulations. The South Burlington Development Review Board (DRB) held a public hearing on April 15, 2003. The applicant was present at the hearing. Based on testimony given at the above mentioned public hearing and on the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the DRB finds, concludes and decides as follows. - FINDINGS OF FACT The applicant is requesting approval for a front porch at 15 Lindenwood Drive to extend 2 ft. beyond the limit set forth in Section 25.118(h) of the Zoning Regulations and Section 3.06 of the proposed Land Development Regulations. 2. The subject property contains approximately 0.64 acres and falls within the Residential 4 (R4) District. 3. The proposal must comply with both the Zoning Regulations and the proposed Land Development Regulations. Section 25.118 of the Zoning Regulations establishes criteria for exceptions to yard setback requirements. Section 3.06(J) of the proposed Land Development Regulations establishes the same criteria. CONCLUSIONS EXCEPTIONS TO YARD SETBACKS Exceptions to setback requirements shall be permitted for single family lots that were in existence prior to February 28, 1974. In addition, exceptions to front setback requirements must meet the following criteria. (a) A structure may encroach into a required front setback up to the average front setback of principal structures on adjacent lots on the same street frontage, but in no event shall a structure have a front setback of less than 5 feet. The applicant has provided information indicating that the average front setback of residences on adjacent lots is 25.6 feet. The proposal involves a proposed front setback of 22.9 feet. Consequently, the criteria set forth in the next paragraph apply to this proposal. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION FRONT PORCH - 15 LINDENWOOD DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE #CU-03-07 (b) Additional encroachment of a structure into a required front setback may be approved by the DRB subject to the provisions of Article 12, Conditional Uses, but in no event shall a structure be less than 5 feet from a front property line. In addition, the DRB shall determine that the proposed encroachment will not have an undue adverse affect on: (i) views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; (ii)access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; (iii) adequate on -site parking; and (iv) safety of adjoining and/or nearby property. 2. The proposal involves an additional encroachment of 2 feet beyond the existing 24.9 ft. front setback on the subject property. This new encroachment will consist of a portion of the front staircase, which will be 11 ft. wide. This will not affect the view, access to sunlight, or safety of adjoining or nearby properties. (c) Any request to expand an existing structure, or place a new structure, to within less than 10 feet of any property line shall include the submission of survey data prepared by a licensed surveyor showing the location of affected property lines, existing and/or proposed structures, and any other information deemed necessary by the Administrative Officer. 3. The proposal does not involve expansion of a structure to within 10 feet of any property line. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA The DRB must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. 4. The proposal will not adversely affect municipal services. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. 5. The proposal is in keeping with residential uses on surrounding properties and will not adversely affect the character of the area or the ability to develop adjacent properties. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. 6. The proposal will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. 7. The proposal is in keeping with applicable regulations. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. 8. The proposal will not affect renewable energy resources. \drb\rn isc\dark\CU-03-07.fcdAoc 2 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION FRONT PORCH - 15 LINDENWOOD DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE #CU-03-07 (0 General public health and welfare 9. The proposal will not have an adverse affect on general public welfare. DECISION MOTION by tafry seconded by QXII- au fib to approve conditional use application #CU-03-07, subject to the following condi ions: 1. This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted to the DRB by the applicants and on file in the Department of Planning and Zoning. 2. Pursuant to Section 27.302 of the Zoning Regulations and Section 17.04 of the proposed Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months of this decision. Mark Bouchernay/abstain Larry Kupferman a nay/abstain Roger Farley a 4/nay/abstain Gayle Quimby a /nay/abstain Michele Kupersmith nay/abstain MOTION CARRIED by a vote of S - D - o Signed this day of /," 2003, by Mark Boucher, Vice Chair \d rb\m is6clark\CU-03-07.fcd.doc 3