Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Planning Commission - 02/11/2020 - Joint Meeting with City CouncilAGENDA SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION Joint Meeting South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Special Meeting 6:30 P.M. Tuesday, February 11, 2020 1.Pledge of Allegiance. (6:30 – 6:31 PM) 2.Instructions on exiting building in case of emergency. Kevin Dorn (6:31 – 6:32 PM) 3.Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items. (6:32 – 6:33 PM) 4.Comments and questions from the public not related to the agenda. (6:33 – 6:43 PM) 5.Consent Agenda for City Council: (6:43 – 6:45 PM) A. ***Authorize City Manager to negotiate and sign an agreement with the recommended consultant, Stantec, to design and engineer the shared use path on the south end of Dorset Street project (STP BP19(4)). 6.***Planning Commission presentation, followed by joint discussion, of approach to and status of the Land Development Regulations (LDR) amendments prioritized as part of Interim Zoning, Jessica Louisos, Chair, Planning Commission (6:45 – 7:30 PM) 7.Convene public hearing to hear comments related to the possible extension of Interim Zoning in those areas currently covered by Interim Zoning for a three-month period [Council Action]. (7:30 – 8:00 PM) 8.Status Report of studies related to the economic assessment of conservation and development; Kevin Dorn, City Manager (8:00 – 8:10 PM) 9.Determine actions & schedule follow-up meeting for additional work: presentation and discussion of Arrowwood Environmental, LLC Habitat Block Assessment & Ranking; consideration of non-LDR- based implementation of Interim Zoning recommendations, final report on economic assessment of conservation and development (8:20 – 8:40 PM) 10.Consider and possibly approve extending Interim Zoning in those areas currently covered by Interim Zoning for a three-month period [Council Action]. (8:40 – 9:00 PM) 11.Other Business (9:00 – 9:05 PM) 12. Adjourn (9:05 PM) Respectfully Submitted: Kevin Dorn Kevin Dorn, City Manager Issues raised by Councilors or the public that have not been on a prior meeting agenda: 1.Cost of development/cost of open space. Issues that have been discussed by the Council where further action is pending: 1.Street light policy. 2.Airport noise survey. 3.Evaluate water billing and rate structure. South Burlington City Council Meeting Participation Guidelines City Council meetings are the only time we have to discuss and decide on City matters. We want to be as open and informal as possible; but Council meetings are not town meetings. In an effort to conduct orderly and efficient meetings, we kindly request your cooperation and compliance with the following guidelines. 1.Please be respectful of each other (Council members, staff, and the public). 2. Please raise your hand to be recognized by the Chair. Once recognized please state your name and address. 3.Please address the Chair and not other members of the public, staff, or presenters. 4.Please abide by any time limits that have been set. Time limits will be used to insure everyone is heard and there is sufficient time for the Council to conduct all the business on the agenda. 5.The Chair will make a reasonable effort to allow everyone to speak once before speakers address the Council a second time. 6. The Chair may ask that discussion be limited to the Councilors once the public input has been heard. 7.Please do not interrupt when others are speaking. 8.Please do not repeat the points made by others, except to briefly say whether you agree or disagree with others views. 9.Please use the outside hallway for side conversations. It is difficult to hear speaker remarks when there are other conversations occurring. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 8 02.846.410 7 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com To: Kevin Dorn, City Manager From: Ashley Parker, Project Manager Subject: Authorization to Negotiate and Contract for Shared Use Path along South End of Dorset Street (STP BP19(4)) Cc: Justin Rabidoux, Director of Public Works Date: February 11, 2020 Background: In November 2019, the City accepted a grant for federal funding of $661,000 to design and construct a shared use path along a 0.7-mile gap on the south end of Dorset Street. This facility was the preferred alternative identified in a scoping study completed by a team composed of City staff, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, Local Motion, and Toole Design Group in February 2017. The project will close a gap between Nowland Farm Drive/Old Cross Road and Sadie Lane, and will complete the South Burlington Dorset Street Shared Use Path System. The project’s 20% match of $165,400, will come from a combination of the following funds: $100,000 from the Penny for Path fund and available Rec Impact Fees (up to $100,000). On January 6, 2020, the City released a Request for Qualifications for this project with submissions due on January 27, 2020. City staff received five Statements of Qualifications (SOQs), and formed a Selection Committee to rank the SOQs. The Selection Committee consisted of: Ashley Parker, City Project Manager; Justin Rabidoux, Director of Public Works; Marla Keene, City Development Review Planner; and Scott Gurley, VTrans Municipal Assistance Bureau Project Manager. The Selection Committee used the following review criteria that was established by the RFQ: •Understanding of the Project (15%) •Knowledge of the Project Area (10%) •Availability of Technical Disciplines (20%) •Qualifications/Experience of Proposed Staff (10%) •Ability to Meet Schedules & Budgets (10%) •Past Performance on Similar Projects (25%) •Knowledge of Federal and State Standards and Policies (10%) Combined Scoring for each submission received was as follows: Respondent: Score (400 max) Stantec 371.5 Lamoureux & Dickinson 363 VHB 355 Fuss & O’Neill 326.5 DuBois & King 269 The Selection Committee felt that all of the SOQs were thorough and complete, and that each respondent was fit to handle this project. Stantec received the most total points by the Committee. Their team has a clear understanding of the project, the requirements associated with a project funded with federal dollars, and have recently completed a similar project in Colchester. Additionally, Stantec has worked with and for the City on numerous projects over the past few years and has always provided great service and value. The Selection Committee is recommending Stantec for the design and engineering contract for this project. The attached resolution authorizes the City to enter into negotiations and sign an agreement with the recommended consultant for a contract to design and engineer the Shared Use Path along the south end of Dorset Street (STP BP19(4)) project. Recommendation: Approve by motion consent agenda item that states – Authorize City Manager to negotiate and sign an agreement with the recommended consultant, Stantec, to design and engineer the shared use path on the south end of Dorset Street project (STP BP19(4)). 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager; South Burlington City Council FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning South Burlington Planning Commission SUBJECT: Presentation and discussion of LDR projects at Joint meeting DATE: February 11, 2020 Joint City Council / Planning Commission meeting Tuesday evening at the Joint City Council / Planning Commission meeting, Commissioners will give a presentation on their overall approach, status, and working decisions made to date on the various projects related to Interim Zoning. This will include a presentation intended to bring the pieces of the work together. The principal objectives of Tuesday’s meeting are: •To provide a clear overall proposed approach and working determinations by the Commission for land conservation & development in the City through careful and balanced regulation of natural resources, planned unit developments, and updated related zoning tools •To provide clarity on the proposed regulation of natural resources within parcels •To provide a proposed approach for addressing some recommendations from the TDR committee report •To identify possible work areas for Council outside of the realm of the Land Development Regulations. Several major pieces of updated Land Development Regulations have already been reviewed by the Planning Commission. Over the coming weeks, the Commission will receive the remaining pieces and begin to review them collectively as they relate to PUDs, Master Plans, natural resources, subdivisions, and changes to underlying zoning- all together for the first time. The Commission is strongly committed to stakeholder input and collaboration throughout their review of this work and is preparing for listening and work sessions in addition to the required public hearings. Enclosed with this memo are two summary documents that the Planning Commission voted to accept this past week. These documents recommend working Commission “positions” on a number of important components of their current work. In voting to accept these positions, the Commission wished to also st ate very clearly that these are working policy positions. As the Commission begins to review all of the pieces together and gather feedback, individual policies may be adjusted. The Commission felt it would be important at this stage, however, to have a set of guiding policy positions to help frame the remainder of the work, provide transparency of thought, and create some level of predictability. At Tuesday’s meeting, the plan is for the Commission to present all of this, discuss any Council questions about the approach & status of the work, and set a meeting date for presentation of the Arrowwood Environmental Habitat Block Assessment & Ranking and any discussion of non-LDR implementation of recommendations that the Council may wish the Commission to assist in. South Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 www.sbvt.gov 1 Affirming Decisions on Land Development Regulations Work – Approved 2020-02-03 Note: The following represent positions of the Commission at this advanced stage of our work. We believe we have provided a thoughtful consideration of comprehensive plan goals and have positions which reflect a balance of these goals. We share these at this stage in order to provide clarity in our positions and overall direction so that stakeholders can have a preview of what to expect. Undoubtedly, minor modifications may still arise in advance of a first full draft of text. 1. Regulated Natural Resources: a. Tiered levels to include hazards, level 1, and level 2, per the resource considerations document reviewed October 29, 2019, with updates per Arrowwood 2020 report and continued work on steep slopes and agriculture. These will apply citywide as part of Chapter 12 update. b. Accept findings & methodology of 2020 Arrowwood Report i. Habitat blocks shall be defined per identified areas of report; Commission still to evaluate whether to include all blocks and/or regulate at the same levels. No additional lands to be regulated as Level 1 habitat blocks. c. Some exemptions or reduction in regulation (example, City Center area) are intended to be reviewed shortly. d. No additional natural resources regulated as hazards or level 1 beyond those identified and accepted above. Those portions of parcels identified in the 2019 IZ Open Space report, that are not a regulated hazard, level 1 or level 2 natural resource shall not be regulated as a hazard, level 1 or level 2 natural resource. 2. Density Calculations: a. Max Residential Density calculated: multiply total land area less hazards by average weighted density i. Maximum density would remove hazard lands in all cases. For development without PUD, would also remove lands classified as Level 1 resource areas. ii. Some exceptions to this calculation for conservation PUDs. b. Minimum residential densities would apply in PUDs i. Calculate by multiplying land area exclusive of hazards and level 1 times residential allocation times underlying density maximum. ii. For SEQ, minimum density (of 4 units/acre for NRT/NR and 8u/acre for VC and VR) would be calculated as an effective density based on impacted land. This would not mandate use of TDRs to meet minimums. c. Minimum and maximum commercial densities are intended; work is ongoing and details tbd. 3. Changes to PUD requirements a. Confirm PUD types (conservation, TND, NCD, Campus) and Infill PUDs for smaller lots 2 b. Clean up LDRs to remove statements that require PUDs based solely on underlying zoning district (airport, SEQ as example) c. Require PUDS for 4+ acres (PC determination on 3/12/2019); special circumstances to be discussed d. PUDs to include mix of land allocations per PUD type e. Open space, road, and building types will be specified from typology standards 4. Master Plan- required for phased projects; details forthcoming. First draft available for review. 5. Affirm that some desired elements of work will take place after adoption of PUD/Subdivision/Master Plan work. These phase 2 components include: a. Score card for PUDs b. Remainder of underlying zoning updates c. Continued work on small lot subdivision d. How to utilize building and open space types City-wide e. Additional update to site plan standards f. Reserved sections of article 12 and scenic views 6. TDR Report Recommendations a. Per PC decisions 02/03/2020 (see separate memo) 7. Affirm intention for community outreach. General game plan to include testing and small group meetings/listening sessions with diverse groups of stakeholders. 8. Open Space Report: for any portions of identified parcels not already restricted in PC work related to natural resources (hazards, levels 1 and level 2), Commission recommends City Council review in balance with Earth Economics report and other metrics and consider any potential conservation using tools outside of the Land Development Regulations. South Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 www.sbvt.gov 1 Planning Commission Recommendations related to TDR Report – Accepted 2020-02-03 Note: The Planning Commission has reviewed and accepted the following recommendations related to the work of the TDR Interim Zoning Committee and its Report. This does not address all recommendations of the Committee Report at this time but instead reflects the Commission’s proposed priority work, alongside the approved overall approach to PUDs and regulations approved by the Commission on February 3 2020, on this subject in the nea rer term. 1. Expand the applicable geography of the Transfer of Development Rights Program throughout the City where appropriate and possible. 2. Expand the TDR Marketplace to establish Receiving Areas outside the SEQ in areas targeted for greater intensity development. a. Determine areas where TDRs can positively affect the marketplace in receiving areas b. Consider how TDR density bonuses could be set for where appropriate or possible - number of bonus dwelling units per acres and/or amount of coverage residential zones, and/or additional coverage and/or building bulk in commercial/industrial zones. c. Consider bonuses for dwelling unit or non-residential building size, height, etc. 3. Consider establishing additional optional Sending Area and/or Parcels from throughout the City, including: a. Land within parcels identified by the Open Space IZ committee as priority for conservation. At this point doing this would not conserve those parcels and/or areas but would give the owners a choice to conserve by selling TDRs, an option they do not have at present. This would not change the zoning for these parcels/areas. b. Areas designated as Level 1 Resources (Habitat Blocks & Steep Slopes 15-20%) as being reviewed under Article 12 of the Land Development Regulations. 4. Consider basing the number of TDRs on a particular parcel (the area used to calculate the number of TDRs) on acreage that excludes natural resources designated as Hazard Areas in the Land Development Regulations. 5. In making determinations, strive to establish a balance between capacity for TDR usage and the supply in order to create a fair and well-functioning TDR market. a. Estimate projected supply of sending areas land and TDRs available b. Estimate the potential market demand of proposed receiving areas c. Consider modifications to the TDR formula in receiving and/or sending zones 6. Collaborate with City Committees including the Affordable Housing Committee to find ways to service housing & conservation goals through tools available.