Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 07_SP-19-39_793 907 Shelburne Rd_R L ValleCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON  DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD  SP‐19‐39_793‐907 Shelburne Rd Maplefields_2020‐02‐ 04_memo v3.docx  DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING   Report preparation date: January 29, 2020  Plans received: October 25, 2019  793 & 907 Shelburne Road  Site Plan Application #SP‐19‐39  Meeting date: February 4, 2020  Owner  793 Shelburne Road:    Phoenix 2, LLC, c/o Ernest  Hoechner  79 Commerce St  Hinesburg, VT 05461    907 Shelburne Road:  Skipco Inc.  793 Shelburne Road  South Burlington, VT 05403  Applicant  R. L. Vallee, Inc.  c/o Skip Vallee  P.O. Box 192  St. Albans, VT 05478  Property Information  793 Shelburne Rd: Tax Parcel 1540‐00793  907 Shelburne Rd: Tax Parcel 1540‐00907  Commercial 1 Residential 15 District  0.36 ac, 0.59 ac  Engineer  Civil Engineering Associates, Inc.  c/o Christopher Galipeau  10 Mansfield View Ln  South Burlington, VT 05403  Location Map        #SP‐19‐39  2    PROJECT DESCRPTION    Site plan application #SP‐19‐39 of R. L. Vallee, Inc. to demolish the existing structures at 907 Shelburne  Road and a portion of an existing service station at 793 Shelburne Road and construct an expanded service  station with two additional fueling positions for a total of ten and an associated 4,265 square foot retail  sales and restaurant building, 793 and 907 Shelburne Road.    CONTEXT    The applicant has concurrently applied for final plat approval for a subdivision to create the lot on which  this building is proposed under #SD‐19‐31.      In the Staff comments for the December 3, 2019 meeting, Staff notes indicated a number of issues  related to the approvability of the above‐referenced project.  A significant issue was that the applicant  had not submitted a valid subdivision application for consolidating the two existing lots.  At the time,  Staff recommended the Board hear the site plan application and allow the applicant to submit a valid  subdivision application.  As discussed in the staff memo for SD‐19‐31, the applicant provided a response  to Staff comments on January 24, 2020, but did not elect to submit the required sketch plan application  until January 29, 2020.      In recognition that the required subdivision procedure is in process, Staff recommends the Board  proceed with a limited review of the Site Plan application, but only to the portion of the applicant’s  January 24, 2020responses that Staff has had the opportunity to evaluate.  Staff strongly recommends  the Board limit the discussion to only these items, and continue the meeting to a future date to allow  time to review the remaining criteria.    These Staff Comments are hung on the framework of the Staff Comments for the December 3, 2019  meeting, with the original key staff comments in red (as always), the applicant’s responses outlined in  pink, and Staff’s January 29th analysis of the applicant’s response in green.  Criteria for which the  Applicant’s responses have not yet been evaluated by Staff are omitted.    The proposed project is within the Commercial 1 Residential 15 (C1‐R15) district, urban design overlay  district, and the traffic overlay district.  The parcel at 793 Shelburne Road is a non‐conforming lot (the  parcel being below minimum lot size) containing an existing non‐conforming structure (the canopy  having zero front yard setback, and in fact overhanging the property line) and two existing non‐ conforming uses:  1) an eight fueling position service station and 2) auto & motorcycle service & repair.   The existing use also does not conform to the traffic overlay district, which is discussed in detail below.  The parcel at 907 Shelburne Road contains a building approved as an existing extended stay hotel which  Staff understands operates as multi‐family housing.  This property also contains nonconformities, as the  lot itself is non‐conforming due to being under the minimum lot size, and the property contains an  existing non‐conforming structure (the building being located within the front yard setback).    PERMIT HISTORY    This complete application was submitted on October 25, 2019 and is therefore subject to the Land  Development Regulations effective October 7, 2019.      #SP‐19‐39  3  ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS    C1‐R15 Zoning District Required Proposed  Consolidated  Lot  Min. Lot Size 40,000 sq. ft.  0.95 ac 5  Max. Building Coverage 40%  15% 4  Max. Overall Coverage 70%  70%  Min. Front Setback 20 ft.  Overhanging 1  X Max Front Setback  Coverage  30%  65% 2  Min. Side Setback 10 ft.  >10 ft.  Min. Rear Setback 30 ft.  >30 ft.  @Building Height 5 stories  1 plus  mezzanine3    1. The front setback is governed by the Urban Design Overlay District.  The existing gas canopy  overhangs the front property line.  The proposed new building will be greater than 20 feet from the  front property line.  2. Taken together, the existing front setback coverage of the two existing lots is approximately 80%.   Discussion of this is included under Commercial District standards below.     3. The applicant has indicated the proposed finished floor elevation (FFE) of the building is 207.75, or  roughly level with the existing grades along Shelburne Road.  Staff estimates based on the provided  plan that the average preconstruction grade, from which height is measured, is approximately  elevation 200. The peak of the roof is proposed to be 25 feet high from FFE, or 33 feet from average  preconstruction grade.  4. The applicant has considered the fuel canopy a building.  Staff does not support this  categorization for the purpose of building coverage because the definition of building coverage  includes measurement from the exterior surface of exterior walls, and the canopy does not have  exterior walls.  Applicant response: None  Update:  The applicant has not responded directly to this comment.  Staff notes this comment is  based on the definition of building coverage, which is distinct from the definition of a building.   Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to update their calculation of building  coverage.    5. As discussed in the memorandum pertaining to application #SD‐19‐31, the applicant has not  submitted a valid subdivision application for consolidating the two existing lots.  Staff  recommends the Board review this application but they not close the meeting until a  determination is made on the proposed subdivision.  The decision on that subdivision will inform  whether this project meets certain standards, including dimensional standards.  Applicant response: None  Update:  As discussed above, the applicant submitted the required sketch plan application on  1/29/2020.  Therefore Staff recommends the Board proceed as described above.    Commercial 1 Zoning District    The purpose of the C1 District is as follows.  #SP‐19‐39  4    A Commercial 1 District is hereby formed in order to encourage the location of general retail  and office uses in a manner that serves as or enhances a compact central business area. Other  uses that would benefit from nearby access to a central business area, including clustered  residential development and small industrial employers, may be permitted if they do not  interfere with accessibility and continuity of the commercial district. Large‐lot retail uses,  warehouses, major industrial employers, and incompatible industrial uses shall not be  permitted. Planned Unit Developments are encouraged in order to coordinate traffic  movements, promote mixed‐use developments, provide shared parking opportunities, and to  provide a potential location for high ‐ traffic generating commercial uses. Any uses not  expressly permitted are prohibited, except those that are allowed as conditional uses.     At Sketch, the Board discussed that the existing service station and auto & motorcycle services & repair  businesses located at 793 Shelburne Road are existing non‐conforming uses (they are not allowed within  the C1‐R15 zoning district).  The proposed retail and restaurant uses are allowed.      Section 3.11 addresses nonconformities as follows.  3.11B.   Continuance and Restrictions.  (1)  Any lawful structure or any lawful use of any structure or land existing at the time of the  enactment of these regulations may be continued, although such structure or use does not  conform with the provisions of these regulations, provided the conditions in this Section 3.11  are met.  (2)  A nonconforming use may be continued provided that such structure shall not be enlarged  or extended unless the use therein is changed to a conforming use.  (3)  A nonconforming structure that is devoted to a conforming use may be reconstructed,  structurally altered, restored or repaired, in whole or in part, with the provision that the  degree of nonconformance shall not be increased.  (4)  A nonconforming structure, or part thereof, shall be maintained, repaired, or restored to a  safe condition as required by the Administrative Officer.  (5)  A nonconforming structure shall not have its degree of nonconformance increased.  (6)  A nonconforming use shall not be extended or enlarged, nor shall it be extended to displace  a conforming use, nor shall it be changed to another nonconforming use, nor shall it, if  changed to a conforming use, thereafter be changed back to a nonconforming use.  (7)  Nothing in these Regulations shall be construed to prevent the owner of a multi‐tenant  building containing one or more nonconforming uses from utilizing a portion of the building  for a conforming use, provided there is no expansion or extension of a nonconforming use  or uses as part of such a change in use.  3.11C.  Alterations to Conforming Structures with Nonconforming Use. A conforming structure  used by a nonconforming use shall not be reconstructed, structurally altered, restored or repaired  to an extent exceeding one hundred percent (100%) of the gross floor area of such structure unless  the use of such structure is changed to a conforming use.  The applicant is proposing to expand the existing service station use by adding two fueling positions. At  sketch, the Board provided direction that when taken together, 3.11B and 3.11C defines this as an  expansion of an existing nonconformity and is therefore not allowed.  Some of those reasons are listed  #SP‐19‐39  5  here.   LDR 3.11B(6) prohibits a nonconforming use (service station) from being expanded.     3.11B(2) also prohibits expansion of the structure containing a nonconforming use.     3.11B(3) does allow reconstruction of a structure containing a nonconforming use provided that  the degree of nonconformity is not increased.  By adding fueling positions and expanding the  canopy, the applicant is increasing the degree of nonconformity.     1. If the Applicant disagrees with the guidance the Board provided at sketch regarding expansion of a  non‐conformity, Staff recommends the Board ask the applicant to explain why they disagree.  Staff  recommends the Board require the applicant to either resubmit memoranda provided at sketch plan  substantiating their position or provide an updated memorandum substantiating their position.    2. If the applicant wishes to seek approval with additional fueling positions, Staff considers the Board  must deny the application.    Additional standards related to nonconformities are included in LDR Section 3.11.    Applicant Response:      Update to comments #1 & 2:  In addition to the expansion of a nonconformity discussed above, the proposed  additional fuel pump has significant impacts on the site layout, including circulation, lighting, and others.  Staff  considers this request analogue to an applicant requesting to condition an approval on a revised driveway  configuration without showing the Board what the revised driveway configuration would look like.  If the  applicant desires for the Board to review the application on the basis of four pumps, Staff recommends the  Board require the applicant to submit a plan set reflecting no additional pump, and Staff can prepare a set of  comments reviewing that configuration.      SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS  A. Site plan or PUD review required.  The applicant has requested site plan review.    B. Multiple structures, multiple uses within structures, and multiple uses on a subject site may  be allowed if the Development Review Board determines that the subject has sufficient  frontage, lot size, and lot depth.      Staff considers the lot size supports the proposed multiple uses based on the lot coverage  being no greater than the maximum allowed, but the lot frontage may not support the  proposed multiple uses based on the front setback coverage far exceeding the allowable  maximum of 30% (65% proposed, see dimensional standards above).    3. Staff considers the Board may require the applicant to reduce the front setback coverage in  order to demonstrate sufficient frontage as required for multiple uses.  #SP‐19‐39  6    Applicant Response:    Update to comment #3:  For similar convenience store and service station applications on  Shelburne Road, the Board has required the applicant to fully comply with front setback  coverage.  Staff considers the Board should not allow the existing front setback coverage to  be “grandfathered” and should require front setback coverage to be reduced as necessary to  meet driveway width, green space, and other considerations discussed elsewhere in the Staff  comments.    C. Parking, Access and Internal Circulation  (1) Parking requirements may be modified, depending in the extent of shared parking, the  presence of sidewalks or recreation paths, and residences lying within walking distance  (defined as no further than one‐quarter (¼) mile for purposes of commercial zoning  districts).  Any  requirements  for  shared  access  and/or  parking  must  be  secured  by  permanent legal agreements acceptable to the City Attorney.   The applicant has proposed 21 standard parking spaces and 10 fueling positions.  Under  the LDR effective October 7, 2019, which applies to this project, required minimum  parking for service station with convenience store is 10 spaces per 1,000 sf gross leasable  area, in addition to parking required for the operational function of the site.  Separately,  there is a minimum requirement of 5 spaces per 1,000 sf gross leasable area for retail  uses and 12 per 1000 sf for short order restaurant uses.  As characterized by the applicant,  the proposed use is service station and retail.  Staff considers the 10 fueling positions as  supporting the services station use.  The applicant has not indicated how much of the  proposed 4,265 sf building will be retail and how much will be restaurant.  Assuming worst  case scenario of 12 spaces per 1,000 sf, the applicant must provide 52 spaces, which they  have not done.      4. Staff therefore recommends the Board require the applicant to provide a breakdown of  retail vs. restaurant use in order to determine whether they wish to grant a modification  of parking requirements.    Applicant Response:    Update to comment #4:  Section 13.01B(3)(d) states that if a use is not specifically listed in  Table 13‐1 through 13‐6, the parking requirements shall be the same as for the most similar  use listed, as determined by the Development Review Board.  The Board at sketch discussed  that parking requirements would be calculated based on one of the above two methodologies,  and  the  applicant  had  no  objections.    Staff  considers  if  the  Board declines  to provide  a  breakdown of retail vs. restaurant, the Board may either assume worst case scenario and  #SP‐19‐39  7  require 52 parking spaces, or categorize the use as “service station with convenience store”  and require 42 parking spaces.  Alternatively, the applicant may withdraw and resubmit their  application to be considered under the LDR effective November 29, 2019, which does not have  a minimum required number of parking spaces for commercial use.  Staff notes that should  the applicant withdraw and resubmit, the applicant would be required to fully comply with the  November 29, 2019 LDR and may not apply only some of the updated regulations.    RECOMMENDATION    As discussed above, Staff recommends the Board continue the hearing to allow review of the applicant’s  response to staff comments #5 through #39.       Respectfully submitted,    Marla Keene, Development Review Planner    20' FRONTYARD SETBACK 30' REARYARD SETBACK 20' FRONTYARD SETBACK±25.3'10' SIDEYARD SETBACK EX. CWD EASEMENT EX. COVERS EX. ELEC.VAULT. EX. PLANTER W/ SIGN EX. TRAFFICLIGHT POLE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEW W W W W W W W W W W EX. JERSEY BARRIER (2) EX. MH#2RIM=206.8 (SEWER) EX. MH#1RIM=207.4 (SEWER) EX. CB#1RIM=206.4 EX. CONC. SIDEWALKEX. GAS CANOPY UEG 40'EASEMENT20'EASEMENT40'EASEMENT WWWWWWWWWWWWEX. RETAININGWALL GGGGGGGGGGGR.L. VALLEE ACCESSEASEMENT 7 3 EX. PAVEMENT PROPOSED RETAIL SALES/ RESTAURANT “VIF.F. ELEV. = 207.75 GREEN SPACENEWGREENSPACE 204199 EXISTING STORE (TO BE REMOVED) (1,680 s.f.±) EXISTING FUEL CANOPY & MPD'S TO REMAIN EX. SWALE 3.3 CMF0.3 BG EX. PAVEMENT CMFFLUSH 1" IPF 1.4 BG MH MH EX.PAVEMENT EXISTING BUILDING CMF1.0 AG 1" IPF0.1 BGDISTRUBED SIGN 9'± 177'±138'±59'± 126'±126'±125'±125'±138'±APPROXIMATE LOCATI O N OF EX. 24" DI LINDENWOO D D R I V E SHELBURNE ROADEXISTING BUILDING QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD 208 208207 207 207206 206206 206205205205204204203203203202202202201201201200200200 199199 198198 198 197 197197 196196196 196 195195194194194 193193193192192192 191190 HANNAFORD DRIVEEXISTING MOTEL (TO BEREMOVED) (1,315 s.f. ±)EXISTING MOTEL (TO BE REMOVED) (2,310 s.f. ±)PROPOSED CONNECTIONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY PROPOSED RETAININGWALL w/HANDRAIL(TYPICAL)RE-CONSTRUCTCONCRETESIDEWALK ADDITIONAL GREENSPACE WITH CURBIMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALK PROPOSED FUTURECONNECTION APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UTILITIESBASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED " MCDONALD'S CORPORATION WESTWOOD,MASS. MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY"PREPARED BY BUCK & PIERCE CIVIL ENGINEERS DATED SEPTEMBER 1974 20'20'22'24' 1 8 34" REBAR0.3 BG EXISTING CANOPY w/ (2) MPD's WW W WOE OE 2 PROPOSED 30" VALVE PROPOSED30" VALVE PROPOSED REALIGNMENT OF CWD WATER MAIN- 30" D.I. CLASS 52 PROPOSED CANOPY EXPANSION w/(1) MPD VI“ EX. RECREATION P A T H EX. PEDESTRIANCROSSWALK MARKING EX. CONCRETE SIDEWALK(±5' WIDE) TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS- REMOVE EXISTING CROSSWALK/ LANDINGS- ADD NEW CROSSWALK/LANDINGSAS SHOWN 25'REDUCE EXISTINGACCESS FROM“ 72 ADD LANDING FOR NEWCROSSWALK- IMPROVE GREEN SPACE- DETECTABLE WARNINGSURFACE ON LANDINGADD LANDING FOR NEWCROSSWALK-DETECTABLE WARNINGSURFACE ON LANDING-COORDINATE DESIGNAND LAYOUT WITHVTRANSCOORDINATE RELOCATION ORREPLACEMENT OF PEDESTRIANCROSSING CONTROLS/SIGNALS WITHSTATE OF VERMONT & TRAFFIC ENGINEER EX. PAVEMENT EXISTING STORE WATER VALVE(NOT FOUND) WATER VALVE(NOT FOUND)STST STSTST STSTAPPROXIMATELOCATION EX. CBRIM=192.3± INV.=184.8± MATCH EXISTINGPAVEMENT GRADE(TYP. @ RT 7)NEW EDGE OFPAVEMENT/CURB(MATCH EX. GRADE) NEW CONCRETECURB PROPOSED RETAINING WALL w/HANDRAIL (TYPICAL) RETAINING WALLw/ RAILING D D D REDI-ROCK WALL PROPOSEDFENCE SSSSSSSMH W W W EX.PAVEMENT PROPOSEDBIKE RACK SNOW STORAGE SNOWSTORAGE W W W W S S S STSTSTSTSSSPROPOSED 6" SDR 35 PVCSEWER CONNECTION w/OIL/WATER SEP. - SLOPE @ 14"/FT. (MIN.) PROPOSED 1" TYPE K COPPER WATERSERVICE TO EXISTING REC. PATH APPROX. LOCATIONEX. WATER SERVICE LINE - SIZE/TYPE UNKNOWN APPROXIMATE LOCATIONEX. 24" D.I. WATER MAIN- IN 36"Ø (71' LONG) STEEL SLEEVE UNDER ROUTE 7- C.L. SLEEVE ELEVATION = 198.5± APPROX. LOCATIONEX. SEWER SERVICE LINE - SIZE/TYPE UNKNOWN APPROX. LOCATION EX. SEWER SERVICE LINE- SIZE/TYPE UNKNOWN APPROX. LOCATIONEX. WATER SERVICE LINE - SIZE/TYPE UNKNOWN EXISTING CANOPY (1,835 s.f.±)8'5' 4' 4'5'E PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SERVICE LOCATION PROPOSED SEWER,19 “ - FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT- COORD. w/ENGINEER & PUBLIC WORKS ,19 “ INV. = “ "NO LEFT TURN" SIGN PROTECT/MAINTAIN EX. UTILITY POLE- COORD. CURB INSTALLATION w/UTILITY COMPANIES/VTRANS WIDEN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO8 FEET FROM NEW LANDING TOLINDENWOOD DRIVE -DETECTABLE WARNINGSURFACE ON LANDING-COORDINATE DESIGN AND LAYOUT WITH VTRANS PHASE II CONSTRUCTION:ALL WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE PEDESTRIANCROSSING OF ROUTE 7 & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTSTO LINDENWOOD DRIVE TO BE SCHEDULED INCONJUNCTION WITH THE STATE OF VERMONTSIGNAL PROJECT "SHELBURNE-SOUTH BURLINGTONNHG SGNL(51)". (CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR FALL2020 TO SUMMER 2021) W APPROXIMATE LOCATION EX. 24" Ø CLASS I D.I. WATER MAIN ±37.0'(PER TAX MAPPING)24'SWCLEANOUT DSM CJGPJM 1" = 20' 15104.07 C1.1 2/1/2019 SHELBURNE ROAD GULF PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED CONDITIONS PLAN ACCIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.E10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com R.L. VALLEE, INC. 282 SOUTH MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 192 ST. ALBANS VERMONT 05478 793 & 907 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT ZONING DISTRICT: COMMERCIAL 1 - RESIDENTIAL 15 NORTH LOT (793 SHELBURNE ROAD) REQUIRED EXISTING LOT AREA 40,000 S.F.“6) FRONT SETBACK 20' 0' SIDE SETBACK 10'25' REAR SETBACK 30'30' BUILDING COVERAGE 40%22% LOT COVERAGE 70%68% LOT FRONTAGE COVERAGE 30% (MAX.) 94% SOUTH LOT (907 SHELBURNE ROAD) REQUIRED EXISTING LOT AREA 40,000 S.F.“6) FRONT SETBACK 20'9' SIDE SETBACK 10'11' REAR SETBACK 30'59' BUILDING COVERAGE 40%14% LOT COVERAGE 70%53% LOT FRONTAGE COVERAGE 30% (MAX.) 68% COMBINED REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED LOT AREA 40,000 S.F.“6)“6) FRONT SETBACK 20'0'0' SIDE SETBACK 10'11'11' REAR SETBACK 30'30'63' BUILDING COVERAGE 40%17%15%LOT COVERAGE 70%58%70% LOT FRONTAGE COVERAGE 30% (MAX.) 80% 65% 2/1/19 CJG LOCAL SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL 2/11/19 CJG ADDED PROPOSED GRADING 5/15/19 CJG SITE REVISIONS/CWD REVIEW PLAN 1.UTILITIES SHOWN DO NOT PURPORT TO CONSTITUTE OR REPRESENT ALL UTILITIES LOCATEDUPON OR ADJACENT TO THE SURVEYED PREMISES. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AREAPPROXIMATE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL UTILITY CONFLICTS. ALLDISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT DIGSAFE (888-344-7233) PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. IN ADDITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE APRIVATE UTILITY LOCATING FIRM TO LOCATE OWNER OWNED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TOSTART OF ANY EXCAVATION.2.ALL EXISTING UTILITIES NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE FINAL DESIGN SHALL BE REMOVED ORABANDONED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS (WITH TIES) FOR ALL UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES. THOSE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER AT THE COMPLETION OF THEPROJECT.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR/RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS (ON OR OFF THE SITE) AS ADIRECT OR INDIRECT RESULT OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 5.ALL GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FULL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 6.MAINTAIN ALL TREES OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE ANDOPERABLE FACILITIES AND UTILITIES. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL ITEMS AND MATERIALSINCORPORATED INTO THE SITE WORK. WORK SHALL NOT BEGIN ON ANY ITEM UNTIL SHOPDRAWING APPROVAL IS GRANTED. 9.IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS SET IN THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THECONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS ANDANY LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS. 10.THE TOLERANCE FOR FINISH GRADES FOR ALL PAVEMENT, WALKWAYS AND LAWN AREAS SHALL BE0.1 FEET. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL EXISTING MANHOLES, COVERS, VALVES, CURB STOPS AND OTHER ITEMS TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO THE NEW FINISH GRADE. 11.ANY DEWATERING NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE SITEWORK SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE CONTRACT AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITHIN TOWN ROAD R.O.W. WITH TOWNAUTHORITIES. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ELECTRICAL, CABLE AND TELEPHONE SERVICES INACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES REQUIREMENTS. 14.EXISTING PAVEMENT AND TREE STUMPS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT ANAPPROVED OFF-SITE LOCATION. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS SHALL BE MADE WITH A PAVEMENT SAW. 15.IF THERE ARE ANY CONFLICTS OR INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS, THECONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR VERIFICATION BEFORE WORK CONTINUES ONTHE ITEM IN QUESTION. 16.PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION IS BASED ON PLAN ENTITLED " ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYBURLINGTON PLAZA" PREPARED BY DUBOIS & KING INC. DATED JANUARY 1997 AND A PLAN ENTITLED " LADNS OF MARTIN'S FOODS OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, INC. - 2 LOT SUBDIVISION" PREPARED BY LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON DATED APRIL 29,2008. THIS PLAN IS NOT A BOUNDARYSURVEY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AS ONE. MONUMENTATION RECOVERED ISCONSISTENT WITH RECORDED DOCUMENTS. 18.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICESINDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, TYPICAL FOR CONCRETE AND SOIL TESTING. 19.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LAYOUT AND FIELD ENGINEERING REQUIRED FORCOMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES WILL PROVIDE AN AUTOCAD FILEWHERE APPLICABLE. GENERAL NOTES UTILITY NOTE: EXISTING WATER & SEWER SERVICE LINE LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ONAVAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THETOWN AND OWNER. UTILITY SIZE AND TYPE ARE UNKNOWN. VERIFICATION OF SERVICE LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS WILL BE REQUIREDPRIOR TO START OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 9/27/19 CJG LOCAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL 10/21/19 CJG REVISIONS PER STAFF COMMENTS LOCATION MAP 1" = ±4000' BURLINGTON PROJECTLOCATION SO. BURLINGTON EXIT 13 SWIFT ST BREWER PKWY LINDENWOOD DR QUEENCITY HANNAFORDDR 7 7 LAUREL HILL 189 89 11/13/19 CJG REVISIONS PER VTRANS COMMENTS 1/03/20 CJG REVISIONS PER STAFF COMMENTS LEGENDFMEGST S T W 207 EXISTING CONTOUREXISTING CURBEXISTING FENCEEXISTING GRAVELEXISTING PAVEMENTEXISTING GUARD RAIL EXISTING SWALE WETLANDS WETLANDS BUFFER EXISTING ELECTRICEXISTING FORCEMAINEXISTING GASEXISTING STORM EXISTING GRAVITY SEWER EXISTING TELEPHONE EXISTING WATER STREAM TEST PITPERCOLATION TESTPROJECT BENCHMARK EXISTING WELL S EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE D EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING SHUT OFFEXISTING UTILITY POLEEXISTING LIGHT POLEEXISTING GUY WIRE/POLEEXISTING SIGNEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREEEXISTING CONIFEROUS TREEEDGE OF BRUSH/WOODSAPPROXIMATE SETBACK LINEAPPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE IRON ROD/PIPE FOUNDCONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND PROPOSED CONTOUR207 PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED PAVEMENT PROPOSED ELECTRIC PROPOSED STORM PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER PROPOSED WATER D PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED SHUT OFF PROPOSED SIGN x206.6 EXISTING SPOT GRADE PROPOSED SPOT GRADE+207.5 P:\AutoCADD Projects\2015\15104.07\1-CADD Files - SB Gulf\Dwg\15104.07 - Site.dwg, 1/13/2020 1:21:28 PM, pmead 20' FRONTYARD SETBACK 30' REARYARD SETBACK 20' FRONTYARD SETBACK±25.3'10' SIDEYARD SETBACK EX. COVERS EX. ELEC.VAULT. EX. PLANTER W/ SIGN EX. TRAFFICLIGHT POLE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEW W W W W W W W W W W EX. JERSEY BARRIER (2) EX. MH#2RIM=206.8 (SEWER) EX. MH#1RIM=207.4 (SEWER) EX. CB#1RIM=206.4 EX. CONC. SIDEWALKEX. GAS CANOPY UEG WWWWWWWWWWWWEX. RETAININGWALL GGGGGGGGGGGR.L. VALLEE ACCESSEASEMENT 7 3 EX. PAVEMENT PROPOSED RETAIL SALES/ RESTAURANT “VIF.F. ELEV. = 207.75 GREEN SPACENEWGREENSPACE 204199 EXISTING FUEL CANOPY & MPD'S TO REMAIN “ EX. SWALE EX. PAVEMENT MH MH EX.PAVEMENT EXISTING BUILDING SIGN APPROXIMATE LOCATI O N OF EX. 24" DI LINDENWOOD D R I V E SHELBURNE ROADEXISTING BUILDING QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD 208 208207 207 207206 206206 206205205205204204203203203202202202201201201200200200 199199 198198 198 197 197197 196196196 196 195195194194194 193193193192192192 191190 HANNAFORD DRIVEPROPOSED CONNECTIONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY PROPOSED RETAININGWALL w/HANDRAIL(TYPICAL)RE-CONSTRUCTCONCRETESIDEWALK ADDITIONAL GREENSPACE WITH CURBIMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALK PROPOSED FUTURECONNECTION APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UTILITIESBASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED " MCDONALD'S CORPORATION WESTWOOD,MASS. MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY"PREPARED BY BUCK & PIERCE CIVIL ENGINEERS DATED SEPTEMBER 1974 20'20'22'24' 1 8 EXISTING CANOPY w/ (2) MPD's WW W W“““ 194.0+ 208.0+ OE OE 2 PROPOSED CANOPY EXPANSION w/(1) MPD VI“ EX. RECREATION P A T H EX. PEDESTRIANCROSSWALK MARKING EX. CONCRETE SIDEWALK(±5' WIDE) TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS- REMOVE EXISTING CROSSWALK/ LANDINGS- ADD NEW CROSSWALK/LANDINGSAS SHOWN 25'REDUCE EXISTINGACCESS FROM“ 72 ADD LANDING FOR NEWCROSSWALK- IMPROVE GREEN SPACE- DETECTABLE WARNINGSURFACE ON LANDINGADD LANDING FOR NEWCROSSWALK-DETECTABLE WARNINGSURFACE ON LANDING-COORDINATE DESIGNAND LAYOUT WITHVTRANSCOORDINATE RELOCATION ORREPLACEMENT OF PEDESTRIANCROSSING CONTROLS/SIGNALS WITHSTATE OF VERMONT & TRAFFIC ENGINEER EX. PAVEMENT EXISTING STORE WATER VALVE(NOT FOUND) WATER VALVE(NOT FOUND) CB #1RIM=206.4INV.=202.4 ST+207. 7 +207.7 5 +207.7 5 +207.7 5 +207. 5 +207.5 ST 207.2+ CB #3 RIM=206.5INV.=200.8 +207.5 207.5+207.5+ T.O.C.=207.6B.O.C.=207.0 20 7 . 7 5 + 207 . 7 5 +207.0+ DMH #1RIM=206.4 INV.(15"N)=199.5INV.(24"W)=199.5INV.(15"S)=202.5STST207.5 + 207 . 5 + 203. 7 + ST ST +197.2ST CB #5RIM=194.5INV.=191.5 SUMP=186.5 207.2+ 207.5+ 205.9+““ APPROXIMATELOCATION EX. CBRIM=192.3± INV.=184.8±195196198200202197.8+207206204 205 206 203207 T.O.C.=199.3B.O.C.=198.7 T.O.C.=196.8 B.O.C.=196.2 199.1 196.6 199.3 199.1 MATCH EXISTINGPAVEMENT GRADE(TYP. @ RT 7)NEW EDGE OFPAVEMENT/CURB(MATCH EX. GRADE) NEW CONCRETECURB PROPOSED RETAINING WALL w/HANDRAIL (TYPICAL) 195 197 T.O.W.=202.0B.O.W.=199.0 RETAINING WALLw/ RAILING T.O.W.=203.0B.O.W.=199.0 198 D D CB #2RIM=207.5 INV.=201.6 +207.9 207.9+ D CB #6RIM=203.6INV.=199.6 DMH #2RIM=206.0INV.=201.5195197T.O.W.=194.0B.O.W.=193.0 T.O.W.=195.0B.O.W.=193.0 INV.=191.0 T.O.W.=SLOPESB.O.W.=193.0 T.O.W.=SLOPES B.O.W.=193.0 REDI-ROCK WALL 19912" STORM 15" STORM 15" STORM 15" STORM 15" STORM 15" STORM 12" STORM DMH #1ARIM=206.4INV.(24"E)=199.5INV.(12"SW)=199.2 +207.9 +208.4 +207. 9 193192208 197 198PROPOSEDFENCE 207206 CHAMBERSYSTEM +2 0 5 . 9 206 205 SSSSSSSMH W W W EX.PAVEMENT PROPOSEDBIKE RACK 191CB #4RIM=202.0INV.=198.0 SUMP=193.0 RISERRIM=192.5 5' WIDE OVERFLOWELEV.=193.5 W W W W S S S STSTSTSTSSSTO EXISTING REC. PATH APPROX. LOCATIONEX. WATER SERVICE LINE - SIZE/TYPE UNKNOWN APPROXIMATE LOCATIONEX. 24" D.I. WATER MAIN- IN 36"Ø (71' LONG) STEEL SLEEVE UNDER ROUTE 7- C.L. SLEEVE ELEVATION = 198.5± APPROX. LOCATIONEX. SEWER SERVICE LINE - SIZE/TYPE UNKNOWN APPROX. LOCATION EX. SEWER SERVICE LINE- SIZE/TYPE UNKNOWN APPROX. LOCATIONEX. WATER SERVICE LINE - SIZE/TYPE UNKNOWN “ 72: “%2: “ T.O.W. SLOPES FROM“72“B.O.W. SLOPES FROM“72“8'5' 4' 4'5'E PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SERVICE LOCATION "NO LEFT TURN" SIGN PROTECT/MAINTAIN EX. UTILITY POLE- COORD. CURB INSTALLATION w/UTILITY COMPANIES/VTRANS WIDEN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO8 FEET FROM NEW LANDING TOLINDENWOOD DRIVE -DETECTABLE WARNINGSURFACE ON LANDING-COORDINATE DESIGN AND LAYOUT WITH VTRANS PHASE II CONSTRUCTION:ALL WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE PEDESTRIANCROSSING OF ROUTE 7 & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTSTO LINDENWOOD DRIVE TO BE SCHEDULED INCONJUNCTION WITH THE STATE OF VERMONTSIGNAL PROJECT "SHELBURNE-SOUTH BURLINGTONNHG SGNL(51)". (CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR FALL2020 TO SUMMER 2021) W APPROXIMATE LOCATION EX. 24" Ø CLASS I D.I. WATER MAIN x207. 9 x206.8 x206.2 x207.5 x208.1 207.5x 207.0x 206.8x x206.4 207.7x 207.3xx207.8 x207.2 x206.2 x206.4 206.0x 206.0 x 205.7x±37.0'(PER TAX MAPPING)24' x207.5 x206.1 207.9x 207.4x SWx206.5 x206.6 x206.6 x206.8 x207.0 x207.5 x207.4 193.4x 193.1x 19 6 DSM CJGPJM 1" = 20' 15104.07 C1.2 9/27/2019 SHELBURNE ROAD GULF PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED GRADING PLAN ACCIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.E10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com R.L. VALLEE, INC. 282 SOUTH MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 192 ST. ALBANS VERMONT 05478 793 & 907 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 9/27/19 CJG LOCAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL 10/21/19 CJG REVISIONS PER STAFF COMMENTS 11/13/19 CJG REVISIONS PER VTRANS COMMENTS 1/03/20 CJG REVISIONS PER STAFF COMMENTS LEGEND FM E G ST S T W 207 EXISTING CONTOUREXISTING CURBEXISTING FENCEEXISTING GRAVELEXISTING PAVEMENTEXISTING GUARD RAIL EXISTING SWALE WETLANDS WETLANDS BUFFER EXISTING ELECTRIC EXISTING FORCEMAIN EXISTING GAS EXISTING STORM EXISTING GRAVITY SEWER EXISTING TELEPHONE EXISTING WATER STREAM TEST PIT PERCOLATION TEST PROJECT BENCHMARK EXISTING WELL S EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE D EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING SHUT OFF EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING GUY WIRE/POLE EXISTING SIGN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE EDGE OF BRUSH/WOODS APPROXIMATE SETBACK LINEAPPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE IRON ROD/PIPE FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND ST S W E PROPOSED CONTOUR207 PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED PAVEMENT PROPOSED ELECTRIC PROPOSED STORM PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER PROPOSED WATER D PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED SHUT OFF PROPOSED SIGN x206.6 EXISTING SPOT GRADE PROPOSED SPOT GRADE+207.5 P:\AutoCADD Projects\2015\15104.07\1-CADD Files - SB Gulf\Dwg\15104.07 - Site.dwg, 1/13/2020 1:27:22 PM, pmead 20' FRONTYARD SETBACK20' FRONTYARD SETBACK10' SIDEYARD SETBACK OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEW W W W W W W EX. GAS CANOPY UEG WWWWWWWWWWWWGGGGGGGGGGGEX. PAVEMENT PROPOSED RETAIL SALES/ RESTAURANT ±4,110 s.f.F.F. ELEV. = 207.75 EXISTING FUEL CANOPY & MPD'S TO REMAIN EX. SWALE EX. PAVEMENT MH MH EX.PAVEMENT EXISTING BUILDING SIGN LINDENWOOD D R I V E SHELBURNE ROADQUEEN CITY PARK ROAD EXISTING CANOPY w/ (2) MPD's W W WOE OE EX. RECREATION P A T H 25'EX. PAVEMENT EXISTING STORE STST STSTST ST D D D SSSSSSSMH W W W EX.PAVEMENT W W W W S S S STSTSTST"NO LEFT TURN" SIGN PROTECT/MAINTAIN EX. UTILITY POLE- COORD. CURB INSTALLATION w/UTILITY COMPANIES/VTRANS W“ (PER TAX MAPPING)SW36' PROPOSEDCURB CUT40' PROPOSEDCURB CUT104' EXISTINGCURB CUT29' EXISTINGCURB CUT40' EXISTINGCURB CUT20' FRONTYARD SETBACK20' FRONTYARD SETBACK10' SIDEYARD SETBACK OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEW W W W W W W EX. GAS CANOPY UEG WWWWWWWWWWWWGGGGGGGGGGGEX. PAVEMENT PROPOSED RETAIL SALES/ RESTAURANT ±4,110 s.f.F.F. ELEV. = 207.75 EXISTING FUEL CANOPY & MPD'S TO REMAIN EX. SWALE EX. PAVEMENT MH MH EX.PAVEMENT EXISTING BUILDING SIGN LINDENWOOD D R I V E SHELBURNE ROADQUEEN CITY PARK ROAD EXISTING CANOPY w/ (2) MPD's W W WOE OE EX. RECREATION P A T H 25'EX. PAVEMENT EXISTING STORE STST STSTST ST D D D SSSSSSSMH W W W EX.PAVEMENT W W W W S S S STSTSTST"NO LEFT TURN" SIGN PROTECT/MAINTAIN EX. UTILITY POLE- COORD. CURB INSTALLATION w/UTILITY COMPANIES/VTRANS W“ (PER TAX MAPPING)SW36' PROPOSEDCURB CUT40' PROPOSEDCURB CUT104' EXISTINGCURB CUT29' EXISTINGCURB CUT40' EXISTINGCURB CUTDSM CJGPJM 1" = 20' 15104.07 C1.3 9/27/2019 SHELBURNE ROAD GULF PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TRUCK TURNING PLAN ACCIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.E10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com R.L. VALLEE, INC. 282 SOUTH MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 192 ST. ALBANS VERMONT 05478 793 & 907 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 9/27/19 CJG LOCAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL 10/21/19 CJG REVISIONS PER STAFF COMMENTS 11/13/19 CJG REVISIONS PER VTRANS COMMENTS FIRE TRUCK TURNINGFUEL TRUCK TURNING 1/03/20 CJG REVISIONS PER STAFF COMMENTS P:\AutoCADD Projects\2015\15104.07\1-CADD Files - SB Gulf\Dwg\15104.07 - Site.dwg, 1/13/2020 1:59:12 PM, pmead