Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0070 0080 Kimball Avenue
Cit of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING 802) 658-MS December, 23, 1998 Mr. Winston Hart Allen Agency 252 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: LN.S. Letter of Credit 4NSL591318 Dear Chip: The City of South Burlington hereby releases the above captioned letter of credit in total. Please submit a copy of this letter to the Keybank National Association. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, J Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RWImcp ZONING (802) 658-7958 KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 149 BANK STREET P.O. BOX 949 KevBanlk BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0949 ****************************************************************************** DATE: DECEMBER 23, 1997 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. NSL591318 BENEFICIARY APPLICANT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON I.N.S. PARTNERSHIP 575 DORSET STREET C/O ALLEN AGENCY SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 252 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: THE ABOVE MENTIONED LETTER OF CREDIT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: THE EXPIRATION DATE IS EXTENDED TO DECEMBER IS, 1998. AS PER THE LETTER OF CREDIT TERMS THIS IS THE ULTIMATE EXPIRATION DATE. ALL REFERENCES TO THE EXPIRATION DATE BEING AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED ARE HEREBY DELETED FROM THE LETTER OF CREDIT AND ANY AMENDMENTS THEREOF. THE ISSUING BANK'S NAME IS NOW KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS KEY BANK OF VERMONT. DRAFTS MUST NOW BE DRAWN ON KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, BURLINGTON, VERMONT AND MUST NOW BE MARKED "DRAWN UNDER KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, BURLINGTON, VERMONT L/C NO. NSL591318 DATED 12/20/95". EXCEPT SO FAR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED, THIS DOCUMENTARY AMENDMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE "UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS" (1993 REVISION) INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, PUBLICATION NO. 500 ("UCP") AND TO MATTERS NOT GOVERNED BY THE UCP SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF VERMONT. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED. THIS AMENDMENT IS TO BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE ABOVE CREDIT AND MUST BE ATTACHED THERETO. YOURS FAITHFULLY, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ZED SIGNATURE City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 October 1, 1997 Mr. Winston Hart Allen Agency 252 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: I.N.S. Letter of Credit #NSL591318 Dear Chip: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the City of South Burlington agrees to reduce the amount of the above captioned letter of credit for the final year of the original three (3) years agreement. The expiration of the agreement is December 18, 1998. We agree to reduce the amount to three (3) thousand dollars. Please have the Key Bank of Vermont forward a revised letter of credit to this office. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp <Ey ��NK OF VERMONT 149 BANK STREET P.O. 'BOX 949 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0949 ****************************************************************************** DATE: OCTOBER 29, 1996 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. N'SL591318 BENEFICIARY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05403 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN�: APPLICANT SOUTH BURLINGTON I.N.S. PARTNERSHIP C/O ALLEN AGENCY 252 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON. VERMQNT 05401 THE ABOVE MENTIONED LETTER OF CREDIT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: EXPIRATION DATE IS EXTENDED TO: DECEMBER -�8, 1997. EXCEPT SO FAR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED, THIS DOCUMENTARY AMENDMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE "UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUME�TARY CREDITS" (1993 REVIST ION) INERNATIONAL M CHABER OF COMMERCE, PUBLICATION NO. 500 AND WHERE NOT APPLICABLE THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS GOVERNED BY THE �A�S OF THE STATE OF VERMONT. ALTER ERMS ND CONDITIOS REMAIN UNCHANGED. THIS AMENDMENT IS TO BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE ABOVE CREDIT AND MUST BE ATTACHED THERETO. YOURS FAITHFULLY, KEY BANK OF VERMONT L, S I T E P LAN L E T T E R O F C RE D I T AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT,' executed in triplicate between So. Burlington INS Partnership , of Burlington, Vermont , hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER", Key Bank of Vermont of Burlington, Vermont hereinafter referred to as ""Bank", and City of So. Burlington, Vermont , hereinafter referred to as "MUNICIPALITY" W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer has received site plan approval from the MUNICIPALITY'S Planning Commission for the development of property located at 70 Kimball Ave., So. Burlington , as depecited on a site plan entitled mmigra io & Naturalization,, dated July 20, 1995 f and prepared by Boyle & Associates WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete the construction of the development site in accordance with the plan approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish a mechanism to secure the obligations of the DEVELOPER for the work as set forth above; and WHEREAS, the BANK executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of issuer of a Letter of Credit hereinafter specified; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: Landscaping 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1 no later than December 15, 1995 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within one year after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guarantee of DEVELOPER's performance of all requirements hereunder set forth, DEVELOPER has caused the BANK to issue its Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the MUNICIPALITY, the original of which is attached to the MUNICIPALITY's copy of this Agreement, and a copy of which is attached to the DEVELOPER's copy of this Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall cause the attached Letter of Credit to be renewed at least thirty (30) days before the maturity date thereof. Failure of DEVELOPER to deliver evidence of such renewal to MUNICIPALITY thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration of said Letter of Credit shall constitute a default of the terms of this Agreement. 5. Said Irrevocable Letter of Credit provides that the drafts drawn under said credit, must be accompanied by a written statement signed by a duly authorized agent of the MUNICIPALITY, that in the judgement of the MUNICIPALITY, the DEVELOPER is in default under the terms of this Agreement, and that the funds to be drawn by the draft are in payment for, or in anticipation of payment for materials, labor and services required for completion of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Payment of each draft will be made at sight when presented to the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY, the payment limited only by the aggregate amounts presented in relationship to the maximum amount of the Letter of Credit. If DEVELOPER shall be in default of the Agreement for seven (7) days because of its failure to provide evidence of renewal of the Letter of Credit, required in paragraph 4 above, the MUNICIPALITY shall notify DEVELOPER by certified mail of said default. DEVELOPER shall then within three (3) business days provide MUNICIPALITY with evidence of said renewal of Letter of Credit or MUNICIPALITY may notify BANK of such default and request payment under said Letter of Credit. 6. The DEVELOPER of Twenty-four Thousand to secure DEVELOPER's not relieve DEVELOPER costs, if actual costs and MUNICIPALITY hereb y 7. The MUNICIPALITY will promptly submit to the DEVELOPER a copy of any draft it submits to the BANK. The consent of the DEVELOPER to payment of said draft by BANK to the MUNICIPALITY under said Letter of Credit shall not be required. 8. The MUNICIPALITY shall not file with the BANK a Statement of Default until ten (10) days after notice has been sent to the DEVELOPER, by certified mail, setting forth its intention to do so. 9. All funds drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used solely by the MUNICIPALITY for the purpose of completing construction of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Any work contracted for by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the MUNICIPALITY's own work force and equipment, or shall be accomplished in such other manner as in the judgement of the MUNICIPALITY shall accomplish the work more expeditiously and economically. 10. If payments are drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to said Letter of Credit, and it shall later develop that a portion of the monies drawn are in excess of the MUNICIPALITY'S needs, any such excess amount shall be refunded by the MUNICIPALITY to the BANK, to be credited by said BANK to the DEVELOPER. 11. This Agreement and said Letter of Credit shall terminate and shall be of no force and effect upon completion of the one year warranty period as described in the above Paragraph 3. If the MUNICIPALITY has not delivered any written notice to the DEVELOPER of any defective or improper work or materials in the construction of the improvements within the twelve (12) month period, or if notice has been given and the defective work or materials have been corrected by the DEVELOPER, the MUNICIPALITY shall forthwith notify the BANK in writing that the Letter of Credit may be canceled, and shall return the original Letter of Credit to the BANK, and both the DEVELOPER and the BANK shall be released from all obligations hereunder and under said Letter of Credit. 12. The BANK may not modify the Letter of Credit without first receiving written consent of the MUNICIPALITY. 13. DEVELOPER hereby agrees to indemnify and hold BANK harmless from all claims, causes of action or liability of any kind arising out of this Agreement or the issuance by BANK of this Letter of Credit, including attorney's fees, as long as BANK follows the terms and conditions outlined in said Letter of Credit. 14 This Agreement shall be binding on all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. 3 s Dated at Burlington , Vermont, thisgthday of December , 199 IN THE PRESENCE OF: So. Burlington Partnership ofl _ By: Duly Authorized Agent (DEVELOPER) Dated at a, , Vermont, this day of \A , 19 9.� . IN PRESENCE OF: Aldr y Authorized Agent ( BANK ) Date , ate , Vermont, this day of 4� 9 IN PRESENCE OF: By: Duly Authorized Agent (MUNICIPALITY) 4 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 27, 1995 Mr. Winston Hart South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership 252 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Hart: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 The City is in receipt of a letter of credit from the Key Bank of Vermont, a copy is enclosed. The City requires that a formal agreement stating the terms of the Letter of Credit be signed by the parties involved, i.e., the developer, bank and the City of South Burlington. Please find enclosed a draft copy of the Letter of Credit agreement. If acceptable, have it signed by an authorized agent for the Key Bank and I.N.S. Partnership and return for signature by the City. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp 1 Encl ' KEY BANK OF VERMONT . ~ - 149 BANK STREET �BANK P.D. BOX 949 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0949 ******************************************************************************* DATE: DECEMBER 20, 1995 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. NSL591318 BENEFICIARY APPLICANT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON I.N.S. PARTNERSHIP 575 DORSET STREET C/O ALLEN AGENCY SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 252 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 ATTN: WINSTON HART LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: WE HEREBY AUTHORIZE YOU TO DRAW YOUR DRAFTS AT SIGHT ON KEY BANK OF VERMONT, BURLINGTON, VERMONT, UP TO AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF US$24,000.00 (TWENTY-FOUR THOUSAND AND 00/100 U.S.DOLLARS), MARKED "DRAWN UNDER KEY BANK OF VERMONT, BURLINGTON, VERMONT LETTER OF CREDIT NO. NSL591318 DATED 12/20/95". YOUR DRAFTS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY YOUR DATED AND WRITTEN STATEMENT, PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY A DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON INDICATING NAME AND TITLE QUOTING: "SOUTH BURLINGTON I.N.S. PARTNERSHIP IS IN DEFAULT UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SITE PLAN LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT DATED 12/08/95 AND THAT THE FUNDS DRAWN BY THE DRAFT ARE IN PAYMENT FOR OR IN ANTI- CIPATION OF PAYMENT FOR MATERIALS, LABOR AND SERVICES REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION OF THE LANDSCAPING AT 70 KIMBALL AVE., SOUTH BURLINGTON, AS DEPECITED ON A SITE PLAN ENTITLED "US IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION" DATED 07/20/95 AND PREPARED BY T. J. BOYLE & ASSOCIATES". PARTIAL DRAWINGS ARE PERMITTED. PRESENTATION OF THE ORIGINAL LETTER OF CREDIT AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY DRAWINGS HEREUNDER. IT IS A CONDITION OF THIS CREDIT THAT IT SHALL BE DEEMED AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED, BY WRITTEN AMENDMENT, FOR ONE (1) YEAR FROM THE PRESENT OR ANY FUTURE EXPIRATION DATE HEREOF, BUT IN NO EVENT LATER THAN ITS ULTIMATE EXPIRATION DATE OF DECEMBER 18, 1998, UNLESS AT LEAST FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY SUCH DATE WE SHALL NOTIFY YOU IN WRITING AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA COURIER/EXPRESS/ CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, THAT WE ELECT NOT TO SO RENEW THIS LETTER OF CREDIT FOR ANY SUCH ADDITIONAL PERIOD. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT SETS FORTH IN FULL THE TERMS OF OUR UNDERTAKING AND SUCH AN UNDERTAKING SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE MODIFIED, AMENDED OR AMPLIFIED BY REFERENCE TO ANY DOCUMENTS, INSTRUMENTS OR AGREEMENTS REFERRED TO HEREIN, OR IN WHICH THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS REFERRED TO OR TO WHICH THIS LETTER OF CREDIT RELATES AND ANY SUCH REFERENCE SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO INCORPORATE HEREIN BY REFERENCE ANY SUCH DOCUMENTS, INSTRUMENTS OR AGREEMENTS. EXCEPT SO FAR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED, THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO THE "UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS" (1993 -REVISION) INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO 500 AND WHERE p� , . , ;NOT APPLICABLE THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF � IVERMONT. � CONTINUED ON PAGE PAGE 2 AND FORMING AN INTEGRAL PART OF IRREVOCABLE STANDBY L/C NO. NSL591318 WE HEREBY ENGAGE WITH YOU THAT ALL DRAFTS AND DOCUMENTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS CREDIT WILL BE DULY HONORED BY US ON DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS, AS SPECIFIED, IF PRESENTED TO: KEY BANK OF VERMONT, C/O KEY BANK OF NEW YORK, 66 SOUTH PEARL STREET, ALBANY, NEW YORK 12207-1501 ATTENTION: INTERNATIONAL DIVISION-NY-31-66-0416, ON OR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF DECEMBER 18, 1996, OR ANY AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED DATE AS HEREINBEFORE SET FORTH, BUT IN NO EVENT LATER THAN THE UNTIMATE EXPIRATION DATE OF DECEMBER 18, 1998. ALL COMMUNICATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THIS LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL BE IN WRITING AND SHALL BE ADDRESSED TO: KEY BANK OF VERMONT, C/O KEY BANK OF NEW YORK, 66 SOUTH PEARL STREET, ALBANY, NEW YORK 12207-1501 ATTENTION: INTERNATIONAL DIVISION-NY-31-66-0416, SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO THE NUMBER OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, KEY BANK OF VERMONT z;; City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 2, 1995 Terrence J. Boyle 301 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site Modification, 70 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Boyle: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the August 22, 1995 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. 7n rely, J Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Chip Hart PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 December 1, 1995 Chip Hart South Burlington INS Partnership 252 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning Violation, 70 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Hart: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that you are in violation of your August 22, 1995 site plan approval for site modifications at 70 Kimball Avenue. This approval required that you obtain a zoning permit prior to commencement of the modifications and the posting of a $24,500 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Please contact Zoning Administrator Dick Ward as soon as possible to obtain the required permit. Your cooperation in obtaining the zoning permit will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Raymdnd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Richard Ward City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 5, 1995 Terrence J. Boyle 301 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site Modifications, 70 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Boyle: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on August 22, 1995. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, iac— Joe Weith,/N City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Chip Hart SO. BURLINGTON I.N.S. PARTNERSHIP 252 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON, VT 05401 802/864-4200 December 8, 1995 Mr. John Whalen Bank of Vermont 149 Bank Street Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Landscaping Letter of Credit - 70 Kimball Ave. Dear John: As you know, we have been making modifications and enhancements to the exterior of our property at the behest of the tenant in the interests of security. Some of these included sitework and landscaping. Regarding the landscaping, the City approval requires us to provide a bond or letter of credit for three years as assurance that we will replace or repair any defective material. Therefore, please provide us with a letter of credit in the amount of $24,000 for this purpose. The City provides an agreement for this situation, to be signed by the Bank, the City and ourselves. Enclosed you will find three duplicate originals executed by me. Please let me know when you have executed them so I can get them to the Zoning Office. Thank you for your attention to this. Sincerely, el Winston W. Hart Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator Enc. existence or location of inderground utmhes are specifically no/♦warranted to be exact or complete Any Installed uNihes located by record drow,ng survey are designated by a check t1) mark. Tne porxing lots and budd,nq, locote.Y by the record drow,nq surveyare as shown on Me plan Deviations are dra dh hne d The Wood/ands wn w o es,gno a os o ows- R, E C E V E D \ / / r:x r•cc, of ....... New trrauure w ,:• _� �� ,.: .1 U L 2 5 1995 o.4 0 / /nv , 526 0 (4 r ,..I!•v •. �_ - _` ��-� :,\ _ N v , %/ ,p rnr our 3233(rP % � - . •, � i-{ � .�' _ D�, '•�, hart ;re; .... ram' tf , ,;� City of So. Burlington 10 Lot l (revised /_ —� / /� Mf` �� ♦ •`• Vt � ,fir �"--_ ,_` • �.'\n� `�/�n- �� / of of of /r / -, c .. `^ _ _ _ ,....o. •' , .. ! ,,�, • I Lat P s sugVc/ ro on cowmen/ a for ` 7-4 .�/ ��' / -f -� _-_� - �-- =_ = = _ _ - -_ ___ ` _ _ ` ` `` ` _ �\ /' me be/wb/ a/ LW / for ingress °Puss 64/weon / - +"E ,Y4• C'B1 r \ / � ' --/ I : � ) ,-s �1t• • �� `� - • \ +1 �.o�_ �� �/ Lot 1010 Kxnba// Av°nue owe won and MrapA r ••'lnr 3P0 /' ',r"_rut.. ,r �aao rNNN�i Me- arw. /OWNiMd on /M m Cu-O%ub ,br Loft 18 P' o"d 'Acnss a /owe LMP c4•w..w ,•.n .w ! I , J 1 , / / easement and right of w M/wn et/ab/tAo/M� k •r.w� / l i c0 / •Ste.-. �. a o,ss �e , / I \\, \�.4vr, er si \ / / Iar` ��� used m conrmm DYi °/�h ,2r, nAe c b / Of Bx1 �. •'eieerele \ ``I .�, I �� - / I �� . ur rl -� / mmn/mane, ego pfp .��.yyM//°�Y ��`�• ! / _� o� / o v°• 1 ` ` °•7. �er..� i ``` o0semenf anos AO/l be awnis )y/M a / I 'rJy n `a r I / 1r� / t; awRM Of Lot t f to on � / Sr ♦. � • / ° / � � \ ( -' � ' •'kx. • . �\a !I / / � � 2. 2 /s 6oroe o«»nf _���G/v r :1 ' / \ i ♦ \ \.L \ a \ i / / , 01 r /Cos for Me n 1/oh mar \ - \ or rI ImenI of f• h .a s iLY Lot 2 New CB,q / I ',I !I 1 -,rim u4tl, ` G/ \ \'. .• i •.. t'.,a.f- / Y i ' ' / / Inr J.666 .�• - �/ � •,♦\ � ..<. r•,rr.n / � i I � /• � \. , / / e 'lam I jD♦ \ �" ,r..s, r..".,,..,<. I. i' ro 4 �•d °. �/• •/'// .•,` des , / / , � °` / n hire .,. '� / / / - l � � � ♦� \ I to + r Poc°r � ', ( •0 6tt F'e � °/ Z / -SNnS pl,Il «.<. Jrwr .n �i\`, , ! I Finish Floor I / z --_I. - , Inr m//O.7J7661 �1,,-wru aTryDeO -_ �.�J•.O• I a 1 / ,e.. =�J' 7 3325 I , + ; , ; mr ,n /6 "coal/ 37660 w RrpRy.._._-. l ! sir szw,r.c,w,• - - \ _.\ rnr. ,n W'wil) J76. 79 _ s. // I 1pi •"r"„w . + ' �/ \ \ 1 �'• / Inv out JP6 37 •' 1••i,a`+ yr `-____ j.` 111 - �� ~ r'�' ' ',t. ``/' 1� •aN ,t' Nrw u..a •, „a xN •r,•. nlr., a.rn ewl.,enr �.� „`s! }��y` ` �.P% �,R/T- "" �,y.�j+vr �- i' ` T7 S_t� } � � I � � -- _`ice°`�\\ ✓ . i' ,r r - �` ,n�� \ , � i� � r� n y,� / � Y,ai.,.. _ 7y + O.a• .!.y'rr .. ��ea, i % �_ 1 *�+T,�j\- ♦ i , I ,A �.x• ♦f r,,,;r\� - I Q / s. u/` ./st°� d�� /jib / I�4 CB10 sq, « r: p•�-p\y\ )" . l l A°tl. "s ` / r pr eM1ej / R,m J57 38 -i .- sp•� r r,y _ \� \�1 r. ����/I r•/' Y , ,� ,•r.' // ,/ L7 / Inr out J23.1P N ' J.� ` \ \ C w/,a,lane ♦ / M °► °°Nr / / �� /�s` f / Co 9 �.ti t:r _� \ _�..' ,�\ d •'e•y,'b'1 •• I '///// / i/// d^+°� •n xa/°JJ2337 ;I Ar4 � ,�^61 �• rnr av/ JP4 47 o"� Construction Notes A',•�'� +o°on� / P\i� / TM location o/ undorpround utilities ,s no/ warranted ro be exact or cpmp/NI TM ContnKy r that/ be solely responsible for all existing uldl/ar and rMu un.nlerupMd serrrq A// pbshm •Ti` -�� \ - � r _ \ ® - \ i olfsat bbckhfl, Sheeluq, ~,no, dNONrwp, c000-V and grubbing, °r S00 control. dust rn- �/l (t - ` \•� ,\ ,� ;` \` \ / raw i conlro, traffic contra, grading, landscaping and all otlw modento/s shall be ncladed as 7 •\ \\ �,,.., .0o -.♦ \ / •.1 par, o/ be rmuvid work Archeological site �'� \ row "'rs.`,�^+ P' /' 2 Tne Contractor snot/ contact a// Wilily cowponies rnrovpn "O,p Sall "a over aawro•.d '♦ -'•eel moans ro locale existing utilities The Contractor shall also contact the Cry of South t Existing owrMad electric nM - - _ _ _ - 1 _ . , a • r M' �t i r co B ..� •\ ,/ a Burs rtinp/on ,n padt to any of their underground uI,/,tles TM Con/rotor snot/ cur► .m Pr �i\ - ••- ` �\ -•♦� - ,•. ,. - ♦ ♦ \ .--� Ann JJ2.43 onenr -one - .4.,yrl of WOY -. ' �.., \\ - ` / y� ~`1•r ." \ \ / Inr out J17J3 /u//y IxCOVO/i soft gels /o determine and rN,/y Inert /aCOtihef OM $hot/ regal b /M _ P r1 ------__-- -- 4ppro.,mo/e conservation loM .`.` - =- �---• - -`'♦ .♦�` ` Engineer any possible con/Acts -Co J Contours on shown a indicate d free/ drainage pattern TM Contractor shag morrMsel • - Woods / r _ _P�� R,m 332 47 ,his p011ern and of MceflOry CO/Ca/a,1 1nllrmedia/1 fp0/ grades ... - Existing dro no wo \ ._ - n, Jr. 4 ♦ ♦♦ ♦ .. ,4 r,. cN/n.Iw .•mI •.,., e• 9 W Y �) �_ A \ r ,. ,- �\ rnr ,n J2716 4 Contractor shall provide oil necessary manpower, material and e0u,prMn/ a connect SAMI \ \. - - - — I ' ,,.x... n,.I.4 .,,, Nr.,. Inr out J26 67 a existing sewer line All conneclahs Shan be boored Contractor shall also writ ,inert Exslinp conlOur -1 , , I , - v r / \ �,so '•ir' 4- u.,xu .1r. 4-,Nr. a,.N,. -���'- 276 ID• -, �,.' of existing fewer/mI N Olscrepincus are found Mldy /M Engineer of once ----,•.---- Smith contour - _ _ IS� 1 --- --o___.—_yLg,� out /3 d♦ - 0 5 Site o layout /r m alai t o fish ,�,s, ,.,., . e/ r /to Existing storm sewer / I (Digo7NoaI1Q 1e SNn O -- -- .P s as q,,,N M//I< n, oe .ass „o. uw.r. _ R,m 3J2 9B .,rx, 7/, r e ,. a m,•w -1 x....0 xn air ,•r, rw Nit : i 's%N%io —Sr• --- Now storm fewer .,w ,1 '99a As•/.�wsN J7J '4 -- ID ,-� Inr ,n(10"1 J23 6B wg t/, 'too co.nw,, rw.w,N NN, .Man• 1.ex , ./ 1 s/a0%IO -• Existing wo/si ` 0 ;�� Inr m (6"rots) 31558 .. -_---..--..- - - 'l • is �, I OI,. r. ,.I O.....ell., rrN.•./ 0.1. I Inr In /6 •'rut JPS B3 / SNA C - - a .I Inr eul 325.53 x - w New watts \ Rim iJ3 93 - �� - ' e''A der \ Design rut Rim J5o%J2473 •' Mew out/s/ Structure Drawn rcA/lip /D1m 5116 Plan / L/ghling Plan - v Existing sanitary sewer 32477 Rim 329 25 - S - New son/Or sewer mr m(6" rose/ J74 93 t `` Chocked m/b y "',,+ , LB 6 Inv. in 3270 (4 1 United Stales Immigration and nr out i24 66 • �- ---• • 41mils of construchbn/snow fence or s,/I /once /nv out 32J75 Scale /'x30' Rim 133 20 u, , un m r Je/ermm•J b , ✓ . \ _ , rs Uu. od /S. .V Jil #AW J) D"echon o/ new sneer drain q1- uut Jet tl Dale Notura/izalion Serving fur -L Pole /um,noire- single -Co5 - `New Shan / t � Rim 333 25: tr.n. ifiroject 19//4 Lo/ P Buvness Vwx NaIA ,Y,mboil Arenue So Burk,plpn, IMrerl Rim 333 31 Inv in (to') 5Z5 /4 Po/e /um,no"o - double 1 •J m, m rest 326.41 KKCt3. & LAMSIRG Calimitin Cn inccn, Inc Led hire �/.isri M bpw Inr in norm Inv in (6") 32597(#--r/w) C 9 9 p,➢pq , ,.., 17 Inv out (/073?5/ 10 Mein Street. COICbHIer, Vermont 05446 .,..bn, sari rmiwe Preliminary Plan ondscape architectS • planning consultants U. 2D.1995 S. a.K . &Naturalization Service 301 college street • bunington . vennont • 05401 • 802 • 658 . 3555 w. ,� t•.3g• outh H-Ur lfngton�Vermon T. I Boyle and Associates landscape architects • planning consultants 301 college street . burlington • vermont 05401 -- phone (802) 658.3565 fax (802) 863-1562 VIA FAX 658-4748 18 AUSLtst 1495 Mr. Rq Belau, Assistant Planner City of South Burlington. 575 Dorwt Street Soutl, Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ray, As you knew Vv re arO revising the original 1 planting h'Burlington`iilrequirements. Thl have it to you e Monday this 21st. The original platltict�, tnet o ±$16,000 in plantings as part of the proposed rn0jifications are dd� t ns to that required p41t7tin9. eritar lighting except that c�tle pole light at the west There are nip alterations to ext entrallec% is to be removed. The total eoverag(• information: Site Area 6.6, Acres; Buildies or ng Cove aw 11 be Acres or g",0; and Building and pavement coverage t5 03 indicated on the revisca planting plan. Again, the coverage is lcss than on the original Flan becattse of the removal of paivcment. I had, at your request, calctulatod the frunt y��rd covcrate to be 21.6"/, as indicated in my nletito to you of 27 July. A bike rack exists and will be Shown on the revised planting plan as well IS other plan,. Sincerely, rm List PLANNING COMMISSION 22 August 1995 page 6 Mr. Simindinger asked the Commission to table the item so they can go back and do some redesigning. Mr. Sheahan moved to table the application until 12 September. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion asked unanimousl . 7. Site Plan application of Chip Hart for site modifications to an existing 66,000 sq. ft. general office building (INS), 70 Kimball Ave: Mr. Boyle showed the entrance as it is today. The plan is to do away with one curb cut and move down to an access further down Kimball Ave. They would lose 17 parking spaces which would require a waiver. Employees would park in the back lot which will be gated. The purpose of the modifications is security. Mr. Boyle also showed the placement of lights and camera mountings. No issues were raised. Mr. Sheahan moved the Planninq Commi_s_sion appro_v_e_the_site plan application of Chip Hart for site modifications to the eiLl 66,000 s ft. eneral office building (INS) 70 Kimball Avenue as de icted on a four a e set of p1nna a e one entitled "U.S. Immi ration & Naturalization Service South Burlin ton Vermont-4-7 oreoared by T.J. Boyle and Associates,dated July 20_,_19951 with the followinq stipulations: 1. All revious approvals and sti ulations which are not su er- seded by this___approval shall remain in effect. 2. Any new exterior li htin shall consists of downcastin shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. An Chan e in lightinq shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation._ 3. The applicant shall ost a $24 500 landsca e bond prior to issuance of a zoning -permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three ears to assure that the landscapinq takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. The Planning Commission approyes 257 parking spaces which represents a seven s'ace of 2.7% shortfall. It is the com- mission's opinion that 257 spaces will be adequate since a si nificant ortion of theross s uare foota e of the buildin is devoted to stairway and elevator space which typically does not aenerate parkinq demand. 5. The 22plicant shall obtain a zoning permit for the site PLANNING COMMISSION 22 August. 1995 page 7 modifications within six months or this approval is null and__ void . r.�,..r. 6. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occu anc Com ance within six months or this. -approval is null and void. 7. Any change to the sit lan shall require approval by the South Burlinaton Plannina Commission. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion assed unanimousl . 8. Sketch plan applicatiion of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc, for the construction of a 50,000 sq. ft. addition to an existing 82,700 sq. ft. light manufacturing facility (Dynapower), 1020 Hinesburg Rd: Mr. Lavigne showed the current access, loading dock and main entrance. The facility is expected to employ 150 people. There are now 120 employed. The new addition is for new equipment. They will close off one truck well and move it to the new addition. They will also continue the fire lane around the new addition. Sewage and parking are adequate. They will, however, add some handicapped spaces and a bike rack. They will also add one light over the truck access area. The color of the building siding will be matched as closely as possible. Mr. Sheahan noted the 1988 approval stipulations that rooftop aparatus must be screened. That was never done. Mr. Lavigne said the equipment is currently in a box enclosure and asked how it might be further screened. Mr. Sheahan noted that Lane Press did a very good screening job for their equipment. Mr. Sheahan also said there are some building mounted lights that are not downcasting and shielded and they project into the res- idential zone. He asked that those be downcast and shielded. Mr. Lavigne said all new lights will be shielded fixtures. Mr. Teeson asked about landscaping. Mr. Lavigne noted they had previously planted an orchard. Mr. Lavigne said they will put trees on Hinesburg Rd. and also move berms and some trees. Mr. Burgess said the Commission would reserve the right to ask for landscaping where it feels it is needed and will rely on staff comments. No other issues were raised. 9. Sketch plan application of Cupola Golf Course, Inc, to subdivide a 25.7 acre lot into 4 lots of 2.9 acres, 3.2 acres, 8/22/95 MOTION OF APPROVAL rWTP HART I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Chip Hart for site modifications to the existing 66,000 square foot general office building (INS), 70 Kimball Avenue, as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled,"U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by T.J. Boyle and Associates, dated July 20, 1995, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 3) The applicant shall post a $24,500 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4) The Planning Commission approves 257 parking spaces which represents a seven (7) space or 2.7% shortfall. It is the Commission's opinion that 257 spaces will be adequate since a significant portion of the gross square footage of the building is devoted to stairway and elevator space which typically does not generate parking demand. 5) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit for the site modifications within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 6) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the areas affected by the site modifications. 7) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Memorandum - Planning August 22, 1995 agenda items August 18, 1995 Page 6 7) CHIP HART - SITE MODIFICATIONS - SITE PLAN This project consists of making site modifications to an existing 66,000 square foot general office building (INS). This office building was approved on 6/26/90 (minutes enclosed). This project located at 70 Kimball Avenue is located in the IC District. It is bounded on the east by a mixed commercial/industrial complex and an undeveloped lot, on the west by an undeveloped lot, on the south by Kimball Avenue, and on the north by Potash Brook. Access/circulation: Access is currently provided via two (2) curb cuts on Kimball Avenue. The westerly 36 foot wide curb cut will be pcN� eliminated. The easterly 30 foot wide curb cut will remain \ \- unchanged. The curb cut being eliminated will make the remaining `ir urb cut the main access. The pavement markings for the left turn ko lane will be shifted to the remaining curb cut. This curb cut also provides access to a vacant lot to the east., Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 12.7% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 45% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage will be reduced from 24.9% to 21.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. Landscaping: Additional landscaping has a value of $24,500. Plantings include Birch, Lilac, Arborvitae, Yew and Linden. The originally approved landscaping plan should be revised to reflect the proposed modifications. Parking: A total of 264 parking spaces are required by standard and 257 spaces including seven (7) handicapped spaces are being provided. This represents a seven (7) space or a 2.7% shortfall. The applicant is seeking a waiver for the shortfall. Staff supports granting the waiver since there are only 170 employees, the building is designed for 200, and a significant portion of the gross square footage of the building will be devoted to stairway and elevator space which typically does not generate parking demand. 2 andum - Planning t 22, 1995 agenda items t 18, 1995 ic: Not affected No additional allocation needed. ing: Details of existing lighting was requested but not tted. Proposed lighting consists of 21 building mounted s with 250 watt bulbs of unknown type and locations. Details Listing lighting and missing information on the proposed ing should be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior rmit issuance. EMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS - ADDITION- SKETCH PLAN project consists of the construction of a 50,000 square foot ion to an existing 82,700 square foot light manufacturing ity (Dynapower). This is an amendment to a planned unit opment approved on 1/26/88 (minutes enclosed). property located at 1020 Hinesburg Road lies within the IO ict. It is bounded on the north by Lane Press and I-89, on ast by undeveloped property, on the south by the undeveloped Acres industrial subdivision, on the west by Hinesburg Road everal residences. s/circulation: Access is provided by a 30 foot curb cut on burg Road. This access also provides access to Lane Press and Teen Acres industrial subdivision. A portion of this access become a City street (Swift Street Extension) when the trial subdivision is developed. One of the original tions of approval was that when Swift Street Extension is the parking lot shall be accessed to the street and the rary northern access be abandoned and seeded. This is shown e plan. Another condition of the original approval required ztersection of the Lane Press/Orchard Lake driveway and Swift t Extension be made at right angle when Swift Street Extension ilt. This should be shown on the plan. lation is adequate. age/setbacks: Building coverage is 3.4% (maximum allowed is Overall coverage is 6.1% (maximum allowed is 50%). Front coverage is 5.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). 7 AUG-21-1995 14:55 PLANNER 658-7955 ALLEN AGENCY REAL EST City of South$urlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658.4748 June 14, 1995 Chip Hart South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership 252 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: INS Building, 70 Kimball Avenue Dear Chip: P.02 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that your request to install additional building mounted lights as described in your letter dated 6/13/95 is hereby approved. The fixtures you propose to install meet the City's requirement for downcasting, shielded fixtures and is therefore consistent with the Planning Commission's original site plan approval. I understand that the lights (WDl8D2's and WD18D4's) will consist of 250 watt bulbs. Kin erely. / Jo Weith, Ci y Planner JW/mcp CC: Dick Ward Raymond Selair TOTAL P.02 AUG-21-1995 14:54 ALLEN AGENCY REAL EST P.01 SO. BURLINGTON I.N.S. PARTNERSHIP 252 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 802/864-4200 June 13, 1995. Mr. Joseph Weith, Planner City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05402 Re: INS Building, 70 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. weith: As you know, since the unfortunate incident in Oklahoma, federal agencies have started to implement a variety of measures to enhance security at federal facilities. Ours, at 70 Kimball Avenue is no exception. In that regard, we hereby request that you approve amending our site plan approval to accommodate the installation of twenty-one downcast lights on the exterior of the building. The lights, to be installed between the second and third floors at 21 feet elevation, will illuminate areas of the site close to the building which are presently too dark for surveillance to be properly done by video cameras (four on the building and four on the site) soon to be installed. The layout has been done by Bob Walbach. A plan is enclosed together with information on the lights. There will be eighteen WD18D2's and three WD18D41s. Sincerely, Winston W. Hart, Partner Enclosures cc: Charles Schenck, INS, (w/out enc.) RUG-10-1995 16:08 ADMIN DIU BUR 802 660 1180 P.01%08 It UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE IMMIGRATION and NATURLIZATION SERVICE EASTERN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER FACILITIES and SPACE MANAGEMENT 70 Kimball Avenue South Burlington, Vermont 05403-6813 Facsimile Number: (802)660-1180 Voice: (802)660-1154 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION LOG: ADDRESSEE: ADDITIONAL COPIES SENT TO OPERATOR: TIME SENT: NO. OF PAGES DATE: L TIME RECEIVED: PAGE 01 OF DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL SENT/RECEIVED (CHARTS, MEMOS, WIRES, ETC.) - `. n;j� "+ "'��,�; r —� 4 ��, o` 11`""' �' �-.;tea• •- a-o.. _ .� ..-. �I � r ` �� -� y i� � �....�C:.�`T �Y, �k?.3•'*Gei� ~.- i'r �C - — �� ��I •�l J� — ' _� s1� Y.L. ��";� � — G- - — =�— -- - --�-�_� � ''�'.'•r_'�� � � � �y?'f •-" '.�i, ..`mil' r? ._�"?{—r�- µ -.. _ _ _ _ _-- ___ —�--_ —f� —�—^_._ter .�•$;~ .^��. � +4y. _�'u�l+��.}�it, L Eastern Administrative Center - South Burlington 802 660 1180 AUG-10-1995 16:08 ADMIN DIV BUR 902 660 1180 P.02/08 i a K I M �IGHTiNG 802 660 1180 AUG-10-1995 16:10 ADMIN DIV BUR 802 660 1180 P.03i08 Adjustability Since the reflector systems for the Wall Director throw light away from the wall, only a small amount of adjustability is needed for fin tuning. The adjustment feature is integrated between the reflector and ballast housings, and can be accomplished with the fixture of Two stainless steel screws are loosened on either side of the balla� housing, This allows the reflector housing to rotate up to 101 while visually observing the light throw. When the screws are retightenec the reflector housing is locked and resealed to the ballast housinc Degree markers are cast into the reflector housing as shown in th( photograph above. The ability to fine tune the forward light throw is particu- larly useful in lighting large overhangs in ceilings and canopies. Sometimes the additional forward throw will be needed simply because the ceiling is curved or sloped. Normally the type IV distribution will be used for this application, and a few degrees of fixture adjustment is all that may be necessary.Jaft Optional 5° Shield Sometimes the advantages of fixture adjustment may �. need balancing to retain total cutoff. An optional shield is available for this purpose, allowing 5° of fixture ad- justment while keeping the cutoff edge of the lumi- naire horizontal. This shield can be used in any up or In down lighting applications, fixture down application. adjustment can bridge the differences between types 11, 111 and IV light distributions. For example, suppose you are lighting a narrow area between a building and property line using a type II distribution. The type Il distribution covers the ground area, but more light is desired on the perimeter wall. A few degrees of fixture ` adjustment will accomplish the desired increase in forward throw with minimal increase in fixture brightness. ` K I M LIGHTING Down • Z'ri Type tt Type in Type II For down lighting, the type If distribution is ideal for service areas behind buildings, alleys;, shopping arcades and pathways next to structures. For up lighting i applications, the type It is meant for narrower dvo►- Up hangs and building projections. In addition, the type 11 places the greatest amount of light on tho wall. Since the fixture is diroctly against tho wall, this is grazing light Alhich accents r(.'liafs and texiures on the wall or facade sti ucture;. Doan Type III For down lighting, the type; IiI distribution is normally used in conjunction with parking lot tic{htinq. Thu Wall t.)irer_tor Win in areas butwrx*n the building ailef whore poles mounted parking lot illuminralion falls off. Up " Increased light levol s may be de.sirod next to Ihr:. building for safoty and advertising. fit addition, y.�.� nitYliurn size overhangs, canopien rand cei1irty:: are ideal:for an upward Type ill. Down Type IV �""Q For down lightincf, this torwnrd throw diatributiori is paificut:arly u;:t:ful wttcn; pole: rnountc:d fumirtaiicir: wotiici pO z(+ uri obstruClion to cars or trucks. t=ttr UP1lghtir19, curved or,sioped Up ceilings and cafmpies will often require ;r the fnrwilid disirihiiGcatt at a type IV leflc:ranr. Type iv 802 660 1180 AUG-10-1995 16:11 ADMIN DIU BUR 802 660 1180 P.05i08 rt • Installation/ Maintenance Ease All Wall Director mounting plates are zinc plated steel. For the small Wali Director this plate is attached directly to the J-box. Large Wall Directors have two mounting options: a stan- dard plate that must be fastened to the wall surface outside the J-box, or an optional plate for casting into poured concrete walls and columns. See page 12, 2 Studs protruding from the mounting plate allow the Wall Director to be hung by keyhole slots located on the back of the ballast housing. This frees both hands to secure the luminaire and make field wire connections without holding the fixture, Since the reflector module is snapped out prior to fixture mounting, ample space is provided Inside the fixture for quick and easy work, Fixture aiming can be done now if the tilt angle has been predeter- mined. If not, fixture aiming can be accomplished while lighted and observing the visual effect, V The final installation step involves snapping the rp flector module into the housing, with quick disconnect plugs completing the wiring to the ballast. The reflector module hinges closed, the lens frame hinges shut and quarter turn latches lock and seal the lumi- naire for weather tight opera- t on. These same features make relamping or ballast access a quick and simple procedure. Note: For uneven or rough walls exposed to rain, caulking must be applied between the mount- ing plate and wall to insure a dry J•box, The Wall Director fixture has its own drainage system to prevent water from entering the back of the housing. The Wall Director may be in- stalled on existing walls hav, no built-in electrical outlets. optional Surface Conduit Mc (SCM) functions as both J-b and fixture mount. This mour device is fastened to the wa allowing external conduit en UL listed and CSA certified f through wiring. See page 11 K I M LIGHTING 802 660 1180 AUG-10-1995 16:12 ADMIN DIV BUR Ordering Information 1 Fixture Fixture catalog number specifies fixture size (14' or 18'), Up (U) or Dawn (fJ) configuration, and light distribution (2, 3, or 4), Smell UP 14' 7a 175w `-� DOWN 14' 70-175W Large UP 18' ;4 250-400W DOWN 1a' ---250-400W Type II distribution WD14U2 WD14D2 WD18U2 WD18D2 Type III distribution WD14U3 WD14D3 WD18U3 WD18D3 EIeCtricai Mode Catalog number specifies,lamp watts, lamp type and line voltage, 14' UP or DOWN Electrical Mode Line Line Max, Lamp (by others) Catalog No, Volts Watts Amps. 70 Watt 70HPS120 120 86 0.69 High Pressure Sodium 70HPS208 208 91 0.47 Clear ED17 Medium Base 70HPS240 240 91 0.40 7bHPS277 277 91 0.35 70HPS347 347 93 _ 0,30 100 Watt 100HPS120 120 116 1.50 High Pressure Sodium 100HPS208 208 130 0.76 Clear ED17 Medii,trn lase 100HPS240 240 130 0.66 100HPS277 277 130 0.60 100HP8347 347 130 0.44 1 150 Watt 150HPS120 120 170 2.25 High Pressure Sodium 150HPS20e 206 188 1.15 Clear ED17 Medium Base 150HPS240 240 188 1.00 150HPS277 277 186 0.85 150HPS347 w 347 186 0.56 70 Watt 7OMH120 120 89 0.85 Metal Halide 7OMH277 277 89 0.40 Clear ED17 Medium Base, 70MH347 -- 347 94 ---_. 0.30 100 Watt 100MH120 120 129 1.15 Metal Halide IOOMH277 277 129 0.50 Clear ED17 Medium Base 100MH347 347 129 0.40 175 Watt 176MH120 120 215 1.80 Metal Halide Clear ED17 Medium Base 175MH2O8 175MH240 208 215 1.05 240 215 0.90 175MH277 277 215 0.80 175MH347 347 215 0,65 Type IV distribution WD14U4 WD14D4 WD18U4 WD18D4 3)5 Electrical Mode Line Line Max. Lamp (by others) Catatog No. Volts Watts Amps, 250 Watt 250HPS120 120 295 2.70 High Pressure Sodium 260HPS208 20e 295 1,50 Clear E18 Mogul Base 2SOHPS240 240 295 1.30 250HPS277 277 295 1.15 2SGHPS347 347 295 0.93 -- 250HPS480 ^ 480 295 0.65 400 Watt 400HPS120 120 457 3.80 High Pressure Sodium 400HPS208 208 457 2.20 Clear E18 Mogul Base 400HPS240 240 457 1,90 400HPS277 277 457 1.70 400HPS347 347 457 1.32 400HPS480 480 457 1.00 250 watt °` PSOMH120 120 295 2.U; Metal Halide 250MH2O8 208 295 1.150 Clear ST20 or ED28 2SOMH240 240 295 1.30 Mogul Base 250MH277 277 295 1,10 Pin -Oriented 2SOMH347 347 290 0.90 250MH480 480 295 0.65 400 Watt 400SMH120 120 458 4.00 Metal Halide 400SMH2O8 208 458 2.30 Clear ED28` 400SMH240 240 458 2.00 Small Outer Jacket 400SMH277 277 458 1.75 Mogul Base 400SMH347 347 458 Pin -Oriented 1.40 400SMH480 480 458 1.00 _ 'Lamp available from I<lm: MS400/HOR/ED28 Venture High-Gutput horizontal burning metal halide; 400W; 40.000 lumeris; 4000°K; 20,000 hr. 4 10 K I M LIGHTING 802 660 1180 AUG-10-1995 16:1 ADMIN DIV BUR 802 660 1180 P.07i08 w Ordering Example: FIXTURE ELECTRICAL MODE FINISH OPTIONS WD14Q3 / 175MH277 / BL-P / A-33/ HS / 5DS 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... etc. 3 Finish TGIC powder coat finish applied to reflector housing, ballast housing and lens frame. Cat No. Color 13L-P Black. DB-P Dark Bronze LG-P Light Gray, WH-P White. Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and !anger lead times. Consult factory. 650 Shield Aluminum shield field -attached to lens frame, Maintains a horizontal cutoff fixture edge when the luminaire is tilted 50. Finished to match the fixture. Cat No, 5DS 9 Quartz Standby Integral electronic device energizes a T-4 mini -can socket during lamp warm-up and after a power interruption. De -energizes prior to HID lamp reaching full brightness. T-4 halogen lamp by others; 10OW max. for WD14, 25OW max. for WD 18, Cat No. oS 4 Photocell Factory installed o inside housing with fully gasketed sensor on side wall. Cat No. Line Volts A-30 120V A-31 208V A-32 240V A-33 277V A-34 480V A-35 347V 5 Houseside Shield Combination louver shield and black end - panel for reflector. Factory installed to reflector module, Reduces light toward wa• rll by the following amounts; APPROXIMATE LIGHT REDUCTION TOWARD WAU, Type II Type III Type IV WD14 -43% .74% -77% W018 -72% -73% -84% Cat No. HIS 7 POlycarbonate Shield For DOWN fixture models only. Vacuum formed clear polycarbonate shield replaces standard tempered �— glass lens. 250W maximum in WDI$ (see specs for higher wattage). CAUTION: Use only when vandalism is anticipated to be high. Useful life is limited by UV discoloration from sunlight and metal halide lamps, Cat No, PS 10 Wall Embedment Plate For WD18 only. ` 'F Zinc plated steel r '� mounting plate "uu for casting into poured concrete walls, beams and columns. Replaces standard mounting plate. See page 12 for dimensions. Cat No, WEP 8 Fusing All fusing is factory installed inside the fixture housing. Cat No. SF Single fusing for 120V, 277V and 347V primary. Cat No. DF Double fusing for 208V, 240V and 480V primary. 11 Surface Conduit -Mount Cast aluminum J-box and fixture mount for attachment (by others) to existing walls, beams or columns. SCM 18 has one Y,' NPT conduit tap in each side, top and bottom. SCM14 has one %" conduit tap in each side and bottom only. Finished to match the fixture. 1! "- I Cat No. SCM14U For W014 fixtures, UP only. SCM14D For all WD14 fixtures, DOWN only. SCM18 For all WO18 fixtures, UP or DOWN. K I M LIGHTING 802 660 1180 AUG-10-1995 16:13 ADMIN DIV BUR e02 660 11f3D P. oe/oe rleaf icafions T I 13' WD14 17' WD18 &%," WD 14 8Y4" WD18 7%' WD14 i r 83/" WD18 7 14M " WD14 18" WD18 Maximum Fixture Weight. WD14 (150HPS)� 26lbs. WD18 (400HPS)- 43 lbs. Warning: Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with local codes or the National Electrical Code. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. EO0 D d I • 0 • 6'/a- 0 0 0y Mounting Plate-WD14 Attaches directly td any standard 4'J-box 8'/::' WD 14 11 %i" W D 18 J-box in wall by others. See note below concerning mounting to uneven surfaces. Reflector Housing: One piece die cast aluminum with integral cooling fins. Rotates against ballast housing to provide 101 of ad- justment with degree markers Cast into housing, At O° adjustment, lens is totally concealed from view above horizontal with fixture aimed downward. Ballast housing: One piece die cast aluminum with integral cooling fins. Fastens to mounting plate with keyhole slots freeing both hands for securing and wiring. One stainless steel socket -head screw on each side of housing frees the reflector housing to rotate for aiming. Tightening the screws locks the two housings together with sealing provided by a silicone gasket. For visual aiming, adjustment may be accomplished with the fixture on. Lens Frame: One piece die cast aluminum with integral hinges and stainless steel pins. Two stainless steel quarter -turn fasteners secure lens frame to reflector housing with sealing provided by a one piece extruded and vulcanized silicone gasket. Lens is clear flat '/,e" thick tempered glass sealed to lens frame with a silicone gasket and retainer clips. For UP models, lens is mounted flush with frame for water run off, and is silicone sealed, Reflector Module: Specular Alzak optical segments are rigidly mounted to an aluminum module which attaches to the housing by a no -tool quick disconnecting hinge and fastener. For WD14 models all sockets are porcelain medium base rated 4KV, For WD18 models all sockets are mogul base with HPS rated 4KV, and MH versions have pin -oriented sockets with molded silicone lamp stabilizers. All sockets are factory prewired with a quick disconnect plug for mating to the ballast. Available in three light distributions, all interchange- able within the same housing. Electrical Components: High power factor ballasts are rigidly mounted inside the housing and are factory prewired with a quick 12 K I M LIGHTING 61A' WD18 LO 8,/?• �_ 5T%Te" Standard Mounting Plate-WO18 Must be securely attached to wall outside the J-box perimeter, Receptacle for fixture mounting screw (2). Optional Wall Embedment Plate-WD18 only. See specifications below, disconnect plug for mating to the socket. Starting temperatures are -40°F for HIPS lamp modes and -20°F for MH lamp modes. Mounting Plate: For WD14 models, mounting plate attaches di- rectly to any Standard 4' J-box. For WD1 S models, standard mounting plate is attached to wall (by others) outside the J-box perimeter. Optional Wail Embedment Plate (WEP) is available for WD18 models to eliminate mechanical attachment by casting dim rectly into poured concrete walls or columns. All mounting plates are zinc plated 14 ga. steel with reinforcing ribs. Two studs are provided in each plate with flange nuts to allow fixture mounting by keyhole slots. For rough or uneven surfaces, sealant must be ap- plied (by others) between mounting plate and mounting surface to insure a dry J-box. Optional Polycarbonate Shield; (For DOWN models only) Fully gasketed one piece vacuum formed clear UV stabilized polycar- bonate shield replaces standard tempered glass lens. For WD18 models-25DW max, May be used with 40OW HPS only in outdoor locations where ambient air temperature during fixture operation will not exceed 85°F. CAUTION: Use only when vandalism is antici- pated to be high. Useful life is limited by UV discoloration from sunlight and MH lamps. Finish: Black, Dark Bronze, Light Gray or White TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint applied over a chromate conversion coating on housings and lens frame. 2500 hour salt spray test en- durance rating. Certification: (UP or DOWN models) UL listed (120, 208, 240, 277 and 480 volt only) and CSA certified (120 and 347 volt only) for wet locations, All photometrics based on Independent Testing Labora- tory (ITL) reports. TOTAL P.08 T.J. BOYLE AND ASSOCIATES Landscape Architects & Planning Consultants 301 College Street BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 658-3555 FAX (802) 863-1562 TO 1 ,.. yK \ i r ;M+ WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ 112"Tum n OLP U ° LNQL!'1Jv UVLri LL DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION RE: ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 0. l "'f � `= 3a f' •� � THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO RECYCLED PAPER: '. Contents: 40% Pre -Consumer • 10 % Post -Consumer S I G N E D : If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burtington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 August 18, 1995 Terrence J. Boyle 301 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site Modifications, 70 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Boyle: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date., Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 22, 1995 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, JW/mcp Encls cc: Chip Hart please give me a call. Si erely Jo Weith, Ci y Planner PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JUNE 1990 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday 26 June 1990, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, William Craig, Catherine Peacock, David Austin Also Present Joe Weith, City Planner; Dan O'Brien, Bob Krebs, Dick Spokes, Bill Cimonetti, Bill Schuele, Carl Carlson, Barbara Bull, Chip Hart 1. Other Business No issues were raised. 2. Public Hearing: Continue Final Plat application of Daniel and Leo O'Brien for re -subdivision of lots 1 and 2 of the 11 lot Business Park North subdivision on Kimball Avenue to adjust the boundary between lots 1 and 2, thereby creating a 6.43 acre parcel (lot 2) and a 1.26 acre parcel (lot 1) Mr. O'Brien advised the Commission that an agreement has been reached on the traffic impact question. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Final Plat application of O'Brien Brothers Agency to adjust the boundary be- tween lots 1 and 2 of the eleven lot Business Park North subdivi- sion as shown on a plan entitled "Final Plat Revision, Lots 1 and 2, Business Park North," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated May, 1990 with the following stipulations• 1. The Planning Commission reserves the right to impose an assess- ment for traffic impacts resulting from developments on lots 1 and 2 on surrounding intersections including, but not limited to, Kim- ball Avenue/Kennedy Drive, Kennedy Drive/Williston Road, and Wil- liston Road/Shunpike Road. Traffic impacts shall be assessed at the time of site plan review for developments on these lots 2. The plat shall be stamped and signed by a licensed land sur- veyor prior to recording. 3. The Final Plat shall be recorded in the office of the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JUNE 1990 page 2 3. Continue Site Plan application of South Burlington I.N.S. Part- nership for construction of a 66,000 sq. ft. building for office use on lot 2 of the Business Park North subdivision on Kimball Ave Mr. O'Brien noted the sidewalk had been changed per agreement with the city. Turn lanes have been added for westbound traffic. Mr. Weith suggested striping to direct westbound traffic. Mr. O'Brien noted the landscape plan is consistent with what the City Planner wanted. Mr. Carlson, a resident of Treetops,noted that traffic at their intersection is terrible at rush hours and hoped consideration for a traffic light is being given. Mr. Burgess advised the appli- cant will pay $15,383 to the Williston Rd. area 2 Intersection Improvement Fund, and the City will install a light next summer before the INS building is occupied. Mr. Austin asked if the new computation system will produce enough funds to computerize the 3 intersections in question. Mr. Weith said it would. He added that the new formula would have to be made official by the City Council. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership for construc- tion of a 66,000 sq, ft. building for office use as depicted on a 6 page set of plans, page one entitled "Site Plan/Lighting Plan United States Immigration and Naturalization Service," prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc, and dated April 1990, last revised June 21, 1990, with the following stipulations- 1. The applicant shall post a $43,500, 3-year landscaping bond prior to permit. The Planning Commission grants a $3,500 credit for existing vegetation within the ravines surrounding the site. 2_. The plan shall be revised prior to permit to show proposed striping to clearly direct westbound traffic on Kimball Avenue away from the eastbound left turn lane. 3. The two proposed curb cuts on lot 2 shall be shared by both lots 1 and 2. Appropriate legal documents which allow lot 1 access over lot 2 shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to permit. The legal document shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to recording 4. Appropriate legal documents which allow parking aisles for lot 2 to be located on lot 1 shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to permit. The legal documents shall be sub- mitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to recording PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JUNE 1990 page 3 5. A sewer allocation of 268 employees. The fee prior to permit. of 4030 gpd is granted based on an estimate applicant shall pay the $2.50 per Gallon 6. The Planning Commission approves a maximum building height of 45 feet. It is the Commission's opinion that the additional height will relate aesthetically to other existing and proposed structures, will not detract from scenic views, and will allow re- tention of additional green space. The applicant shall submit building elevations which show preconstruction grade, post -con- struction grade, and building height, including rooftop apparatus, at time of permit application. 7. The applicant shall contribute prior to permit $15,383.._.to the Williston Road Area 2 Intersection Improvement �nci..:- w-This fund includes improvements to the Kennedy Drive/Kimball Avenue and Kennedy Drive/Williston Road intersections 8. Proposed lighting shall be downcast luminaire 9. Sidewalk construction and associated fees shall be in accordance with the attached sidewalk agreement dated 6/25/90 and signed by I.N.S. Partnership, Osgood -Hart Properties, and O'Brien Brothers. 10. A building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Comprehensive Plan Update a. Revised Draft #2, Southeast Quadrant; Mr. Austin raised the question of new interchanges. It was noted there is some money from University Mall for the additional on - ramp at Kennedy Drive. Mr. Burgess asked what is happening with the official city maps. Mr. Weith said the City Engineer has been working with an intern and the project is almost done. Mr. Burgess said that on p. 5 in the Land Use first paragraph, the work "exclusively" shoudl be changed to "primarily." Mr. Burgess noted that population issues are a political issue and didn't think the Commission should deal with them without direction from the City Council. Mr. Schuele said population is PLANNING COMMISSION 5 JUNE 1990 page 3 neighborhood relations as well as traffic problems. Mr. Belter expressed concern with moving the general aviation area closer to a residential neighborhood. Mr. Weith expressed an ad- ditional concern with closing the Airport Drive link. Mr. Flaherty noted this is a proposal and represents an innovative approach to moving airport traffic away from residences. Mr. Craig asked what would become of the old terminal. Mr. Paris said they are struggling with the idea. Mr Craig said he could foresee a commercial use there which would bring in traffic that they are trying to keep out. Mr. Paris said all traffic would be funnelled through the new access. Mr. Belter commented that it looks like half the facilities are going to be rebuilt. Mr. Paris said the current configuration requires these facilities to be constructed. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Revised Final Plat application of Daniel and Leo O'Brien for resubdivision of lots 1 & 2 of the 11 lot Business Park NOrth subdivision on Kimball Avenue to adjust the boundary between Lots #1 & 2, thereby creating a 6.43 acre parcel (lot 2) and a 1.26 acre parcel (lot 1) Mr. O'Brien said both lots meet minimum lot and frontage requirements. The resubdivision will not increase the intensity of use. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the final plat applicationof O'Brien Brothers Agency for resubdivison of lots 1 and 2 of the eleven lot Business Park North Subdivision to adjust the boundary between lots 1 and 2 as shown on a plan entitled "Final Plat Revision, Lots 1 and 2, Business Park North," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated May, 1990 with the following stipulations: 1. The pLannin Commission reserves the right to assess potential traffic im acts resultin from ro osed develo ments on lots 1 and 2 on surrounding intersections including, but not limited to, Kimball Avenue/Kennedy Drive, Kennedy Drive/Will ison Road, and Williston Road/Shunpike Road. Traffic impacts shall be assessed at the time of site plan review for developments on these lots. 2. The plat shall be stamped_ and signed by a licensed land surveyor prior to recording. 3. The Final Plat shall be recorded in the office of the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Mr. Craig seconded the motion. PLANNING COMMISSION 5 JUNE 1990 page 4 Mr. O'Brien said the stipulation about traffic impact was contrary to the history of the business park. He said they agreed to con- tribute their share to the Kimball Avenue/Kennedy Drive inter- section, but the new stipulation says they will pick up some un- determined cost for improvements at other intersections. Mr. Burgess said the Commission has more control over intersections at subdivision hearings. Mr. O'Brien insisted this is not a sub- division but is a boundary line adjustment. He said they discussed intersections 12 years ago. They are, he added, willing to participate in any fair plan. Mr. Austin said the Commission ought to determine if they are con- tractually obligated because of the previous stipulations and recommended getting an opinion from the City Attorney. Ms. Peacock and Mr. Craig agreed to withdraw their motion. Mr. Craig then moved to continue the hearing until clarification is received from the City Attorney. Mr. Belter seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5) Discussion ft. buildin subdivision with I.N.S. g for office on Kimball Partnership on contruction of a 66,000 sq use on lot #2 of the Business Park North Avenue Members agreed to hear an informal discussion since the subdivision request has been continued. Mr. O'Brien asked that the items be on the 26 June agenda since they are under time constraints. Members agreed. Mr. O'Brien said the building will be brick. It will house the offices of INS. They are dealing with General Services out of Boston for the project. There would be 2 curb cuts to serve the lot and these curb cuts would also serve lot #1. Ms. Peacock said she had a problem with 2 curb cuts. Mr. Weith noted that in the rest of the business park the lots have more than one curb cut. He had no problem with 2. Mr. O'Brien said they will build a sidewalk the length of the property of lots 1 and 2. Mr. Craig noted that because of a pre- vious stipulation, they will have to connect the sidewalk to 30 Kimball Avenue. Mr. O'Brien said they would build an equivalent amount of sidewalk further down to connect with #30. Mr. Craig said they have to build the sidewalk on the lot containing the parking lot and that he would agree to going that far. CITY OF SOUM [3Ui2LI N� ION Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant dj3�lt) ,3i2DT�C�.S 2) Name of Subdivision 1jQkK Af04 ,s1 3) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application: 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: or.y3a�A-ti°'� /3E'Tz Z4:,i.7� GOT 5 / '�` 2 - , &&E-4 i �46 5) Submit five copies of a final set of plans consisting of a final plat plus engineering -drawings and containing all information required under section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit tfb draft copies of all legal documents required under section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. 21 c7d (Signature) a r contact person Date 6/26/90 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Final Plat application of O'Brien Brothers Agency to adjust the bound- ary between lots 1 and 2 of the eleven lot Business Park North Subdivision as shown on a plan entitled "Final Plat Revision, Lots 1 and 2, Business Park North," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated May, 1990 with the following stipulations: 1. The Planning Commission reserves the right to impose an assessment for traffic impacts resulting from developments on lots 1 and 2 on surrounding intersections including, but not limited to, Kimball Avenue/Kennedy Drive, Kennedy Drive/Williston Road, and Williston Road/Shunpike Road. Traffic impacts shall be assessed at the time of site plan review for developments on these lots. 2. The plat shall be stamped and signed by a licensed land surveyor prior to recording. 3. The Final Plat shall be recorded in the office of the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void. M E M O R A N D U M To: 60utn buriington Manning Lommission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: June 26, 1990 agenda items Date: June 22, 1990 2) BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT, LOTS 1 AND 2. KIMBALL AVENUE The outstanding issue regarding this application is whether a stipulation can be included which would reserve for the City the right to impose an assessment on lots 1 and 2 toward traffic improvments to the Kimball Avenue//Kennedy Drive, Kennedy Drive/Williston Road, and Williston Road/Shunpike Road intersec- tions. I was instructed to get an opinion from the City Attor- ney. The original approval for the 11 lot subdivision stipulated that future developments could be assessed a fee toward a new traffic light at Kimball Avenue/Kennedy Drive. This approval did not address improvments to other intersections. It is Steve Stit- zel's opinion that since conditions have significantly changed since the original approval (e.g., the subdivision is taking much longer to build out than originally expected), it is justifiable to revise earlier conditions of approval. Therefore, he does not see a problem, legally, with including the stipulations discussed above. Such a stipulation may be the safest route for the City. Howev- er, as discussed in my memo to the Commission dated 6/15/90, the applicant has agreed to contribute $15,000 toward necessary improvements at both Kennedy Drive intersections (Kimball and Williston Road). A revised impact fee formula (also described in the memo) would assure a more appropriate contribution for lot 1 in the future when a building is proposed for that lot. There- fore, in my opinion, the stipulation is probably not necessary since the end result (i.e., contributions) will be the same either way. 1 Planning File Data for Computer Input. 1 . Original Property Owner Z. Developer's Name sa►.,�_ 3. Name of Developments-- 4. Address of Development or Project 5. Type of Project s �(/�.t�,- r-.,:;.. p�--� /t/-'. {C tS���-• �J .,f� . Minor Subdivision (MI) Major Subdivision (MS) Site Plan (SP) 6. Zoning District 1 -�— — 7. Zoning District Z R. Zoning Board Approval date if Required 9. Date of Planning Commission Hearings/Meetings Site Plan Date - or Sketch Plan Date 10. Preliminary Plat date _ 11. 1 Z Final Plat Date Revised Final Plat Date 1 (if . applicable)�� 13. Revised Final Plat Date 2 if applicable) 1 4 . Acreage of 'rotal Project 15. Use of Land 1 1 G . Use of' band Z Usc () f' Land 3 ()I' Land :1 t 9 . Niiinber of Lots 2 �'t�• `�umhot- of Single Fami I Unit �I Nttnthey- ()f Mt.tIti- t•rimily Units ritet it>t, ('ost �f Bit ldin� 23. Size of Building (Square footage) 24. Streets City Street CS Private Street PS 25. Date of Acceptance of streets by City _ 26. Bond -Landscaping _ 27. Bond -Streets _ 28. Bond -Sewer 29. Bond -Water 30. Bond -Other 31. Date Mylar Due (90 days after approval)' 32. Date Recorded - 33. Expiration date of Approval 34. Date of First Building Permit 34. Tax Map Number 36. Map File Location 1 37. Map File Location 2 38. Map File Location 3 Other fees (Type and amount) Preparers Name: Date: Posted in Computer (Name. Date): RELOCATE EXISTING PLANTS 5 2 1 t3 1 - 1 INS AUGUST 16, 1995 Common Name Austrian Pine Crabs Linden Locusts Plum Red Maple NEW PLANTING (-ty Botanical Name Common Name 2400 Ajuga reptans'Bronze Beauty' Bugleweed 13 Amelanchier canaciensis Downy Shadblow 9 Belula papyriiera 10 Betula papynfera 40 Cotoneaster apiculata 45 Junipertss horizontalis 'Emerald Spreader ? Malus 'Snowdrift 9 Synrvja amureasis 'Ivory sik 104 Thuja occidentalis nigra 26 Taxus 'Wardii' 3 Tilia oordata 200 Vinca minor 13 Planters (see schedule below) +2 yds. prepared topsoil Plants and drainage stone for planters Paper Birch Paper Birch Cranberry Cotoneas:er Emerald Spreader Snowdsfi Crabapple Japanese Tree lac Dark American Arborvitae Wards Yew Littteleat Linden Vinca Size 8-10' 2 1/2' 3" 3' 6-8' 3" Size 2 1i2' T-8' 2 112'-3' 12'-14' 18'-24' 1 a"-24' Notes w peat pot • S = 7 �� B&B nea f ��/5� 5 stern mn B&B B&B clump 42 Can B&B 1 3J4'-2' B&B heavy G j w — 8'-10' B&B heavy 3-4' B&B 18'-24' B&8- 2 1t2'-3" B&B street tree �a 2 112' peat pot �, Boyle and Associates landscape architects . planning consultants 301 college street • burlington • vermont 05401 phone (802) 658-3555 fax (802) 863-1562 VIA FAX 658-4748 27 July 95 Mr. Ray Belair Assistant Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: INS Frontage Yard Coverage Dear Ray, The current coverage allowed is 30% of 50' front yard and the front yard is 31,500 s.f. Thirty percent of this allows 9.450 s.f. and 7.840 s.f. exists. After the removal of the west entry, but leaving a 6' walkway, the coverage will be 6,800 s.f. or about 1000 s.f less than currently exists (about 21.6%). Sincerely, Te7r7-041 nce Jyle Preliminary Comments - Planning August 22, 1995 agenda items August 3, 1995 Page 3 HIP HART - SITE MODIFICATIONS - SITE PLAN --- 264 parking spaces are required by standard and staff counts only 257 spaces available which is a seven (7) space shortfall. This should not be a problem. --- the originally approve planting plan should be revised to reflect the proposed modifications. --- provide details (cut -sheets) for all alterations to exterior lighting and show locations on plan. --- provide revised front yard and overall coverage information. --- a bike rack should be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. M PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 August 2, 1995 Terrence J. Boyle 301 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site Modifications, 70 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Boyle: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to these comments with revised plans and or additional information, if appropriate no later than Friday, August 11, 1995. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Ran�dz d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls cc: Chip Hart M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: August 22, 1995, agenda items Date: August 3, 1995 ARRY HILL CLUB - EAST TERRACE - I-89 1. The City of South Burlington has a small parcel of adjacent land. It should be shown on the plan. 2. There exists a 60 foot r.o.w. adjacent to Dooley property to this parcel. It should be shown. 3. There exists water and sewer easements across this parcel from the Williston Road direction. They should be shown on the plan. DYNAPOWER CORPORATION- HINESBURG ROAD Preliminary site plan is acceptable, however, final plan shall include site drainage, etc. TIMBERLAKE ASSOCIATION - EXXON STATION - WILLISTON ROAD 1. It is recommended that a 3 foot grass strip be provided between the sidewalk and curb at the intersection of East Terrace and Williston Road. This is mainly because of snow removal. 2. Plans are well done and are acceptable. INS BUILDING - KIMBALL AVENUE Plan prepared by T.J. Boyle and Associates dated July 20, 1995 are acceptable. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Wallace Possich, South Burlington Fire Chief Re: Plans Reviewed for August 22, 1995 Agenda Date: August 10, 1995 I have reviewed the following site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. Dynapower Dated 7/21/95 Hinesburg Road Project No. 94053 Fire Lane (access) is needed on south side of addition, otherwise acceptable 2. Quarry Hill Club Dated 7/17/95 3. 4. 5. Spear Street Acceptable Timberlake Associates Williston Road Acceptable Flegenheimer Street Acceptable U.S. Immigration Service Acceptable Dated 7/14/95 Proejct No. 04-9411 Dated 7/25/95 Project No. 89114 I 4. Flegenheimer Street Project No. 04-9411 Acceptable 5. U. S. Immigration Service Dated 7/25/95 Project No. 89114 Fire Department connection and fire hydrant need to be relocated to "gateway" area to the right of main entrance so as to allow access near driveway; Otherwise Acceptable. Wall Director .t. T The Wall Director`" is a' i refreshing and innovative new approach to lighting ground surfaces, canopies,ceilings and architectural features from a wall mounted luminaire. Every aspect of its form expresses the functional qualities engineered into the design. Yet, the Wall Director is vigorously non -mechanical in looks. y Its flowing lines extend from the wall like a sconce, while simple geometry complements the architectural surface as functional enrichment. Combined with performance optics, total cutoff, adjustability and invertible mounting, the Wall Director embodies the ultimate architectural wall luminaire. TABLE OF CONTENTS DOWN Applications 2 UP Applications 3 Features 4-9 Ordering Information 10-11 Specifications 12 Related Products 13 Photometry: See the WD Series Photometric catalog in the separate Kim Photometric binder. 41kISM LIGHTING SITE /AREA PARKING STRUCTURE ROADWAY ARCHITECTURAL FLOOD / ACCENT LANDSCAPE 16555 EAST GALE AVENUE PO BOX 1275 CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA 91749 U.S.A. PHONE 818 / 968 5666 FAX 818 / 369 2695 U COPYRIGHT 1994 KIM LIGHTING INC. Patents Pending Wall Director is a trademark of Kim Lighting Inc. Total Cutoff All reflector systems for the Wall Director are engineered to achieve cutoff in the vertical plane while spreading light away from the wall to generate a type II, III or IV distribution. In the vertical plane, light is reflected at the highest possible angle for maximum fixture REFLECTED LIGHT- spacing. VERTICAL PLANE Excessive straight down illumination is avoided by the elimination of downward reflect- ing surfaces. In the horizontal plane, light is precisely directed away from the wall. All light striking the wall comes only from the lamp. This wall illumi- nation may be aesthetically de- sirable whether directed up or down, and may be substantially reduced by using the optional REFLECTED LtRhouseslde shield If desired. HORIZONTAL Non -cutoff wall fixtures are de- signed without any consideration for architectural compatibility by day, or human visibility at night. The tremendous glare from these fixtures represents wasted energy, contributes to the envi- ronmental problems associated with sky glow, and causes light trespass onto adjacent property. 4 K I M LIGHTING The term "total cutoff' as applied to a DOWN fixture, means that no portion of the luminaire's optical system is visible above horizontal. In addition to this physical requirement, the fixture must also meet IES photometric requirements for classification as a cutoff luminaire. The Wall Director meets both requirements. While some wall lumi- naires claim to be cutoff, their visible optical systems create bright- ness that overwhelms the surrounding architecture. The Wall Director utilizes a horizontal lamp orientation and a flat clear glass lens to achieve total cutoff. The distribution of light is handled en- tirely by a precision reflector system engineered for maximum fix- ture spacing with outstanding uniformity. 900 Adjustability Since the reflector systems for the Wall Director throw light away from the wall, only a small amount of adjustability is needed for fine tuning. The adjustment feature is integrated between the reflector and ballast housings, and can be accomplished with the fixture on. Two stainless steel screws are loosened on either side of the ballast housing. This allows the reflector housing to rotate up to 100 while visually observing the light throw. When the screws are retightened, the reflector housing is locked and resealed to the ballast housing. Degree markers are cast into the reflector housing as shown in the photograph above. The ability to fine tune the forward light throw is particu- larly useful in lighting large overhangs in ceilings and canopies. Sometimes the additional forwaethrowwill be needed simply because the ceiling curved or sloped. Normally the type IV distribution will be used for this application, and a few degrees of fixture adjustment is all that may be necessary. AMW In down lighting applications, fixture \ adjustment can bridge the differences between types II, III and IV light distributions. For example, suppose you are lighting a narrow area between a building and property line using a type II distribution. The type II distribution covers the ground area, but more light is desired on the perimeter wall. A few degrees of fixture adjustment will accomplish the desired increase in forward throw with minimal increase in fixture brightness. Optional 50 Shield Sometimes the advantages of fixture adjustment may need balancing to retain total cutoff. An optional shield is available for this purpose, allowing 5° of fixture ad- justment while keeping the cutoff edge of the lumi- naire horizontal. This shield can be used in any up or down application. K I M 5 LIGHTING Type II For down lighting, the type 11 distribution is ideal for IV service areas behind buildings, alleys, shopping arcades and pathways next to structures. For up lighting applications, the type 11 is meant for narrower over- Up hangs and building projections. In addition, the type II places the greatest amount of light on the wall. Since the fixture is directly against the wall, this is grazing light which accents reliefs and textures on the wall or facade structure. Down Type III For down lighting, the type III distribution is normally used in conjunction with parking lot lighting. The Wall Director fills in areas between the building and where pole mounted parking lot illumination falls off. Up Increased light levels may be desired next to the b1'Jh building for safety and advertising. In addition, medium size overhangs, canopies and ceilings are ideal for an upward type III. Down Type IV -44" For down lighting, this forward throw distribution is particularly useful where pole mounted luminaires would pose an obstruction to cars or trucks. For up lighting, curved or sloped Up ceilings and canopies will often require the forward distribution of a type IV reflector. Type IV Ordering Information 1 Fixture Fixture catalog number specifies fixture size (14' or _ 18'), Up (U) or Down (D) CM configuration, and light distribution (2, 3, or 4). Type II distribution Type III distribution Type IV distribution Small UP 14' lip, 70-175W WD14U2 WD14U3 WD14U4 DOWN 14' WD14D2 WD14D3 WD14D4 70-175W Large UP 18' 250-40OW WD18U2 WD18U3 WD18U4 DOWN 18' WD18D2 WD18D3 WD18D4 250-40OW 2 Electrical Mode Catalog number specifies lamp watts, lamp type and line voltage. � 1^ UP or DOWN Electrical Mode Line Line Max. Lamp (by others) Catalog No. Volts Watts Amps. 70 Watt 70HPS120 120 86 0.89 High Pressure Sodium 70HPS208 208 91 0.47 Clear ED17 Medium Base 70HPS240 240 91 0.40 70HPS277 277 91 0.35 70HPS347 347 93 0.30 100 Watt 100HPS120 120 115 1.50 High Pressure Sodium 100HPS208 208 130 0.76 Clear ED17 Medium Base 100HPS240 240 130 0.66 100HPS277 277 130 0.60 100HPS347 347 130 0.44 150 Watt 150HPS120 120 170 2.25 High Pressure Sodium 150HPS208 208 188 1.15 Clear ED17 Medium Base 150HPS240 240 188 1.00 150HPS277 277 188 0.85 150HPS347 347 188 0.56 70 Watt 70MH120 120 89 0.85 Metal Halide 70MH277 277 89 0.40 Clear ED17 Medium Base 70MH347 347 94 0.30 100 Watt 10OMH120 120 129 1.15 Metal Halide 10OMH277 277 129 0.50 Clear ED17 Medium Base 10OMH347 347 129 0.40 175 Watt 175MH120 120 215 1.80 Metal Halide 175MH2O8 208 215 1.05 Clear ED17 Medium Base 175MH240 240 215 0.90 175MH277 277 215 0.80 175MH347 347 215 0.65 q • or DOWN Electrical Mode Line Line Max. Lamp (by others) Catalog No. Volts Watts Amps. 250 Watt 250HPS120 120 295 2.70 High Pressure Sodium 250HPS208 208 295 1.50 Clear E18 Mogul Base 250HPS240 240 295 1.30 250HPS277 277 295 1.15 250HPS347 347 295 0.93 250HPS480 480 295 0.65 400 Watt 400HPS120 120 457 3.80 High Pressure Sodium 400HPS208 208 457 2.20 Clear E18 Mogul Base 400HPS240 240 457 1.90 400HPS277 277 457 1.70 400HPS347 347 457 1.32 400HPS480 480 457 1.00 250 Watt 250MH120 120 295 2.60 Metal Halide 250MH2O8 208 295 1.50 Clear BT28 or ED28 250MH240 240 295 1.30 Mogul Base 25OMH277 277 295 1.10 Pin -Oriented 250MH347 347 290 0.90 250MH480 480 295 0.65 400 Watt 400SMH120 120 458 4.00 Metal Halide 400SMH2O8 208 458 2.30 Clear ED28* 400SMH240 240 458 2.00 Small Outer Jacket 400SMH277 277 458 1.75 Mogul Base 400SMH347 347 458 1.40 Pin -Oriented 400SMH480 480 458 1.00 *Lamp available from Kim: MS400/HOR/ED28 Venture High -Output horizontal burning metal halide; 400W; 40,000 lumens; 4000'K; 20,000 hr. 10 K I M LIGHTING V x A 5 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) (802)865-4190 _ South Burlington INS Partnership 252 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone # ) (802)865-4190 Chip Hart 252 College Street, Burlington, Vt 05401 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone # ) 658-3555 Terrence J. Boyle 301 College Street Burlington, Vt 05401 A N -R •*-rT �: -,� �. Kimball Avenue z , i ,.�...:., . .,TA..:I T r.�tR-E,4S-: 5) LOT NUMBER ( if applicable) Lot 2 Business Park North 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Same as existing office building. 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 66,000 net usabl 3 floors at 22000 each 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 170 +/- Designed for 200 9) LOT COVERAGE: building less %; landscaped areas more % building, parking, outside storage % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ , Landscaping $ 25,000 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost') $_ 25,000 I 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 11/95 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) N/A Estimated trip ends (in and out) Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m._ 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m._ 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION:- 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION:_ 7/25/95 DATE OF SUBMISSION 8/22/95 DATE OF HEARING during the following hours: ; 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3 p.m. ; 5-6 p.m. ; 6-7 p.m. N/A N/A IGNATURE OF APPLICANT Terrence J. Boyle relocate ti \ proundcove crabapple a 1 Ca1nB• ti light boMa x \ granite bollard e existing light Ij II I I RECEIVED JUL2 5 1995 City of So. Burlington e Wh Hite tmcfi. juniper, cotoneaster, virra end bWOs T.J. Royle and Associates Preliminary Plan IarWecape aah teas . planning consultants 20.1996 U. S. Immigration & Naturalization Service 301 college streot . burlirpton • vermont • 05401 • BW • a5e • 3555 1p1r„ r ,�,� t'•zo' outh-6urlingtonl-Wrmont—l-- —Ca and bUbS J.Np•r Wean, Wilard ma control. 9-ft W W piw bWah cct..... .r 1&' ENTRY FROM PARKING LOT iwe cardedm of rod. SECTION THROUGH BERM Scala 1" = 5'-0" SECTION AT PLAZA Scale 1" = 50'-0" P���IbED JUL2 5 1995 City of So. Burlington -- - — SECTIONS Q larwWayeacndects • W«xlirpconwttmn a�w &Naturalization 301 caiepemeet • twdinpton • vermont • 05401 • 802 . 65B . 3555 rahwm uth Burlington, -Vermont SO. BURLINGTON I.N.S. PARTNERSHIP 252 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 802/864-4200 June 13, 1995 Mr. Joseph Weith, Planner City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: INS Building, 70 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Weith: As you know, since the unfortunate incident in Oklahoma, federal agencies have started to implement a variety of measures to enhance security at federal facilities. Ours, at 70 Kimball Avenue is no exception. In that regard, we hereby request that you approve amending our site plan approval to accommodate the installation of twenty-one downcast lights on the exterior of the building. The lights, to be installed between the second and third floors at 21 feet elevation, will illuminate areas of the site close to the building which are presently too dark for surveillance to be properly done by video cameras (four on the building and four on the site) soon to be installed. The layout has been done by Bob Walbach. A plan is enclosed together with information on the lights. There will be eighteen WD18D2's and three WD18D41s. Sincerely, Winston W. Hart, Partner Enclosures CC: Charles Schenck, INS, (w/out enc.) t FITZPATRICK-LLEMLLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 May 31, 1990 Mr. Winston Hart Allen Agency 252 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Mr. Daniel O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Realty P.O. Box 21E14 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Traffic Impact Evaluation - INS Office Building Kimball Avenue - South Burlington, Vermont FILE: 90061 Dear Messrs. Hart & O'Brien: As requested, we have evaluated potential traffic impacts resulting from the construction of the above referenced project to be located on Kimball Avenue in South Burlington. This office building will have a gross floor area of 66,030 square feet and will be occupied by approximately 266 employees. Access will be via two new curb cuts onto Kimball Avenue. Two major areas of concern to local and state officials are addressed herein; Traffic Congestion and Traffic Safety. The objective of this evaluation is to identify and assess potential traffic impacts created by this project in each of the above areas of concern, for both existing and future traffic conditions. For this evaluation, the study area includes three intersections in the immediate vicinity of this project: Kennedy Drive & Williston Road, Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue, and Williston Road & Shunpike Road. TRAFFIC CONGESTION Information regarding existing traffic volumes within the study area was obtained from the following sources: 1. Route Logs - Williston Road, Kennedy Drive and Kimball Avenue, Vermont Agency of Transportation. Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Two 2. Automatic Traffic Recorder Counts: a) Sta D36 - Williston Road, Vermont Agency of Transportation, April 26 - May 3, 1988. b) Sta D451 - Kimball Avenue, Vermont Agency of Transportation, April 24 - May 1, 1989. c) Williston Road (west of Industrial Avenue), Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, May 1, 1989. d) Kennedy Drive (two locations north and south of Kimball Avenue), Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, June 29, 1989. e) Kimball Avenue (east of Kennedy Drive), Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, June 29, 1989. 3. Turning Movement Counts: a) Williston Road & Kennedy Drive, Vermont Agency of Transportation, July 13-14, 1988. b) Williston Road & Shunpike Road, Vermont Agency of Transportation, August 2-3, 1988. c) Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue, FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated, May 14-15, 1990. The results of the above referenced traffic counts were used to develop 1990 and 1995 design hour volumes at the aforementioned intersections. The calculation of future design hourly volumes (DHV) involves several steps. First, annual average daily volumes (AADT) were projected at an annual background growth rate of 5.0% to 1990 and 4.0% from 1990 to 1995. DHV's were then determined from the AADT's, using DHV/AADT ratios recommended by the VAOT. In this case, K-factors (DHV/AADT ratios) of 12% and 11% were used for the 1990 and 1995 design years, respectively. The net result of these calculations is a DHV growth rate, from 1990 to 1995, of approximately 2.2% annually. For this evaluation, DHV's for both A.M. and P.M. peak weekday hours were calculated. The above growth rate is relatively high, particularly in light of recent statewide traffic growth trends. It was chosen, however, to account for the high level of development which is presently occurring nearby in Williston. Similarly, the lower 1995 K-factor was selected because of existing capacity limitations of major roadways and intersections adjacent to the study area. Once background traffic volumes were determined, it was necessary to estimate the volumes and directional patterns of the additional traffic which will be generated by this project. An estimate of the traffic generation for this project was developed through the use of vehicular trip generation rates from FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Three the "ITE Informational Report, Trip Generation, 4th Edition". That report outlines the results of trip generation studies for numerous land -uses. For this project, the applicable land -use category is "General Office Building". Table 1 illustrates the estimated trip generation. In this case, a good correlation was obtained between the trip generation estimated on both the gross floor area and the projected number of employees. TABLE 1 PROJECTED VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION Enter Exit Total Average Weekday 503 503 1,006 vte/day A.M. Peak Hour 122 1B 140 vte/hour P.M. Peak Hour 22 117 139 vte/hour The directional distribution of project -generated traffic was estimated from the distribution of population and projected trave CD�: routes within Chittenden County. Appendix A illustrates the resulting A.M. and P.M. peak hour directional distributions of project -generated traffic. Potential traffic congestion impacts were determined by performing intersection capacity analyses at the three intersections within the study area. The methodology used to determine intersection capacity was obtained from the "Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 19B5". Traffic conditions were analyzed for a number of existing and future development scenarios. By doing so, a better understanding of existing versus future conditions and the impact of this project can be obtained. The intersection capacity analyses also include an assessment of geometric and/or signal timing improvements needed to maintain desirable levels of traffic congestion or to mitigate any adverse impacts specifically created by this project. Levels of traffic congestion are defined by several parameters. For example, signalized intersections use vehicular delay (seconds per vehicle), arterial highways use average running speed (mph), and unsignalized intersections use reserve capacity (vph). In all cases, those parameters are subdivided into ranges which are then referred to as levels of service. Level of Service A represents very low loading with ample reserve capacity and no vehicular delays; C represents average conditions; and E represents a street FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Four or intersection at capacity, causing long queues and vehicular delays. One last range, F, occurs when traffic volumes exceed the available capacity of an intersection or street. Urban highways and intersections are generally designed to maintain Level of Service D or better during DHV conditions. One notable exception occurs at unsignalized intersections, where Level of Service E is not considered to be unreasonable on minor street approaches. Appendix B details the criteria for levels of service at signalized and unsignalized intersections. F-or clarity, the results of the intersection capacity analyses at each of the three intersections are presented separately. Williston Road & Kennedy Drive This intersection is presently a major point of traffic congestion despite being signalized and having multi -lane approaches. The results of capacity analyses of 1990 and 1995 DHV conditions without this project confirmed that this intersection is presently over -capacity with Level of Service F resulting. The results of capacity analyses of existing conditions without this project indicate that during 1990 A.M. DHV conditions, the westbound Williston Road left -turn and southbound Kennedy Drive movements experience F, while other movements experience levels of service ranging from B to D. By 1995, all movements on the eastbound Williston Road approach and the westbound Williston Road through/right-turn movements will drop to F also. During 1990 P.M. DHV conditions without this project, all movements on the westbound Williston Road approach plus the southbound Kennedy Drive left -turn movement experience F. Additionally, the eastbound Williston through/right-turn movements experience E. By 1995, those latter eastbound movements plus the northbound Airport Drive left-turn/through movements will drop to F also. The above capacity problems at this intersection have been previously identified, notably in a study entitled "Traffic Systems Management Study, JHK & Associates, July 1987" which was prepared for the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Five That study recommended several areas of geometric improvements plus the replacement of the existing pre -timed signal controller with a fully -actuated one. Those improvements, if implemented, would significantly reduce existing levels of traffic congestion without this project. Overall intersection levels of service during projected 1995 A.M. and P.M. DHV conditions without this project would be D and E, respectively. Those results were obtained with modifications to the existing signal phasing plus one relatively minor change in the northbound lane assignments. The latter change was to use double left -turn lanes in combination with the through lane; making the three northbound lanes exclusive left -turn, combination left-turn/through and exclusive right -turn, respectively. T- a impact of this project was determined by superimposing project -generated traffic onto the projected 1995 design hour volumes. The capacity analyses were then repeated, with overall results of D and E during 1995 A.M. and P.M. DHV conditions, respectively. The results of the capacity analyses at this intersection are summarized in Table 2. Detailed results are also enclosed under separate cover. These results show that even with this project, future traffic congestion conditions at this intersection will be substantially improved over existing conditions. Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue This intersection is also a major point of existing traffic congestion, primarily because traffic volumes have grown to a level where traffic signalization and dedicated turning lanes are needed. The results of capacity analyses of 1990 DHV conditions without this project confirmed that this intersection presently experiences Level of Service F on the Kimball Avenue and Treetop Condominium approaches. A signal warrant evaluation of this intersection was prepared by the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission in June 19B9. The results of that evaluation found that of the eleven warrants, all five volume -related warrants were satisfied. Typically, the satisfaction of only one warrant is required in order to install traffic signal control. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart S O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Six TABLE 2 WILLISTON ROAD & KENNEDY DRIVE DHV LEVELS OF SERVICE & DELAYS' Existing Geometrics - Without Project A.M. Peak Hour Approach/Lanes 1990 1995 Eastbound LT/TH C (17) F (82) TH/RT C (17) F (82) Westbound LT/TH Fe * Fe * TH/RT D (31) F (63) Northbound LT/TH C (16) C (17) ---- RT C (20) C (22) Southbound LT F * F TH/RT B (13) B (14) OVERALL F * F With Geometric Improvements Approach/Lanes Eastbound LT TH TH/RT Westbound LT TH TH/RT Northbound LT LT/TH RT Southbound LT TH/RT OVERALL 1995 w/o Project A.M. P.M. P.M. Peak Hour 1990 1995 9 (9) Bt' (10) E (45) F (95) F * F� F * F D (27) E (49) C (17) C (19) F * F B (14) B (15) F * F 1995 with Project A.M. P.M. D (29) D (29) D (29) D (29) D (35) D (33) E (47) D (35) D (35) D (33) E (47) D (35) E (54) F (73) E (54) F (73) B (13) D (29) B (13) D (29) B (13) D (29) B (13) D (29) D (33) E (53) D (35) F (95) D (27) E (45) D (28) F (63) D (35) C (22) D (35) C (22) E (53) F (107) E (53) F (107) D (26) D (32) D (28) D (32) D (31) E (42) D (35) E (46) ' Delays expressed in seconds per vehicle. e Operates as a de -facto exclusive left -turn lane. * Delays are not calculated when the volume/capacity ratio exceeds 1.20 on any lane group(s). FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Seven With signalization and exclusive left -turn lanes on both Kennedy Drive approaches, overall intersection levels of service during projected 1995 A.M. and P.M. DHV conditions without this project would be D and C, respectively. It should be noted that the present width of Kennedy Drive is adequate for a three -lane cross section, and that the only work required to provide those left - turn lanes is to install pavement markings. With only the above improvements and this project, the 1995 A.M. DHV condition drops to E, overall. The eastbound (Treetop) left- turn/through lane and northbound (Kennedy Drive) through/right- turn lane, however, will operate at F during the 1995 A.M. DHV. During the 1995 P.M. DHV, the overall intersection operates at C; while the above two lane groups operate at D. An examination of future turning movement volumes indicated that an exclusive northbound Kennedy Drive right -turn lane and related adjustments to the signal timing would significantly increase overall intersection capacity. Those additional improvements, when incorporated into the capacity analyses with this project, improved overall intersection levels of service to C during projected 1995 A.M. and P.M. DHV conditions, respectively. The results of the capacity analyses,at this intersection are summarized in Table 3. Detailed results are also enclosed under separate cover. These results show that even with this project, future traffic congestion conditions at this intersection will be substantially improved over existing conditions. Williston Road & Shunpike Road Shunpike Road is one of three possible routes linking Williston Road and Kimball Avenue. As such, it is relatively lightly traveled at the present time. Recent commercial development on the north side of Williston Road directly opposite Shunpike Road, however, has significantly increased turning movements at this intersection. The results of unsignalized intersection capacity analyses at this intersection without this project indicate that both the northbound Shunpike Road and southbound approaches presently experience Level of Service E during 1990 and 1995 DHV conditions. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Eight TABLE 3 KENNEDY DRIVE & KIMBALL AVENUE DHV LEVELS OF SERVICE & DELAYS' Unsignalized / Existing Geometrics - Without Project _Approach/Lanes Eastbound LT TH/RT Westbound LT TH/RT Northbound LT Southbound LT A.M. Peak Hour 1990 1995 F F C D F F A B A A C D Signalized and with Geometric Improvements 1995 w/o Project A.M. P.M. Approach/Lanes Eastbound LT/TH RT Westbound LT/TH RT Northbound LT TH/RT or TH`' RT=' Southbound LT TH/RT OVERALL E (42) C (17) D (29) B ( 1 1 ) D (29) D (39) E (48) B (8) a (22) (15) (32) (13) (29) (27) (24) (12) P.M. Peak Hour 1990 1995 E E B C F F C C A A A A 1995 with Project A.M. P.M. D (31) C (21) C (16) B (13) D (26) D (29) B (7) B (12) D (29) D (29) D (33) D (26) C (22) C (15) D (30) C (24) B (9) B (14) D (30) C (21) C (23) C (20) ' Delays expressed in seconds per vehicle. 1' De -facto exclusive left -turn lane. :� With Project scenario only. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Nine Superimposing project -generated traffic onto existing and future design hour volumes, and repeating the capacity analyses found that future levels of service with this project during 1990 and 1995 DHV conditions would continue to be E on both the northbound and southbound approaches. The results of the capacity analyses at this intersection are summarized in Table 4. Detailed results are also enclosed under separate cover. TABLE 4 WILLISTON ROAD & SHUNPIKE ROAD DHV LEVELS OF SERVICE & DELAYS Without Proiect A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Approach 1990 1995 1990 1995 Eastbound LT B D C D Westbound LT B C C D Northbound LT/TH/RT D D D E Southbound LT/TH/RT E E E E With Proiect A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Approach 1995 1995 Eastbound LT D D Westbound LT C D Northbound LT/TH/RT E E Southbound LT/TH/RT E E Additionally, even with this project, future traffic volumes at 7 this intersection during peak periods do not satisfy the warrants D for the installation of a traffic signal. TRAFFIC SAFETY The safety of vehicular traffic traveling two and from this project is largely dependent on the geometric and physical conditions of existing and proposed streets and intersections, projected traffic volumes, and the presence of adequate traffic control devices. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Ten The primary factor affecting traffic safety at the proposed access to this project is the availability of adequate sight distances. Kimball Avenue is posted at a 35 mph speed limit in this immediate area. Based on prevailing off-peak speeds of 40-45 mph, and a minimum of 7 seconds visibility time of oncoming traffic, the recommended minimum intersection sight distance equals 460 feet. Existing available sight distances from the two proposed curb cuts considerably exceed that distance in both directions. The most recent available five-year (1984-1988) accident histories of the three intersections within the study area of this evaluation were also examined. For clarity, the results at each of the three intersections are presented separately. Williston Road & Kennedy Drive Eighty-five (85) reported accidents occurred at this intersection during the above five-year period, resulting in an accident rate of 1.90 accidents per million vehicles. In comparison, the statewide average accident rate at similar intersections equaled 0.58 accidents per million vehicles. Because the actual rate exceeds the statewide average, the critical accident rate was also calculated for this intersection. The critical rate is a statistical test of the expected variability in the actual rate at a given location. At this intersection, if the actual rate exceeds the calculated critical rate of 0.89 accidents per million vehicles, the probability of it being an unsafe intersection equals 99.5%. That being the case, this intersection is classified as a high accident location. To better understand the possible causes of the poor accident history at this intersection, the types and causes of each accident were tabulated. Of the e5 accidents, 60, or 71%, involved vehicles turning in opposing directions. The causes of the 85 accidents were slightly more diverse, however the most frequent cause, failure to yield right-of-way, accounted for 53 accidents, or 62% of the total. These types and causes of accidents are indicative of a high - volume intersection lacking appropriate turning lanes and signal phasing. The signal phasing is important primarily in its treatment of left -turns. Protected left -turn phasing is much safer at high -volume multi -lane intersections. That type of FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Eleven phasing and additional turning lanes have been incorporated into the future capacity analyses and proposed improvements at this intersection. Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue Fourteen (14) reported accidents occurred at this intersection during the 1984-198$ period, resulting in an accident rate of 0.60 accidents per million vehicles. That rate exceeds the statewide average (0.58) for similar intersections by a small amount. Consequently, this intersection would not be considered to be an unsafe one. Th6 proposed improvements, which include signalization and additional turning lanes, are projected to substantially improve future traffic safety conditions at this intersection. Williston Road & Shunpike Road Fourteen (14) accidents were reported at this intersection during the same five-year period, resulting in an accident rate of 0.39 accidents per million vehicles. That rate is less than the statewide average for similar intersections; therefore this intersection would not be considered to be an unsafe one. CONCLUSION This report has evaluated potential traffic impacts resulting from the proposed INS office building to be located on Kimball Avenue in South Burlington. Existing levels of traffic congestion were found to require immediate attention at two major intersections within the study area of this evaluation: Williston Road & Kennedy Drive and Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue. The geometric and traffic control improvements necessary to restore reasonable levels of traffic congestion at those two intersections have been previously identified in traffic studies prepared by the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission. They are summarized on the following page. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Twelve 1. Williston Road & Kennedy Drive a) Construction of exclusive left -turn lanes on both Williston Road approaches. b) Construction of an exclusive left -turn lane on the Kennedy Drive approach. c) Replacement of the existing pretimed traffic signal controller with one that is fully actuated and which can provide protected left -turn phasing. 2. Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue a) Installation of traffic signal control. This signal would be semi -actuated and coordinated with the one at Williston Road & Kennedy Drive. It would also provide protected left -turn phasing on both Kennedy Drive approaches. b) Installation of pavement markings to provide exclusive left -turn lanes on both Kennedy Drive approaches. With the above improvements, the projected traffic congestion impacts of this project can then be addressed. Two areas of additional geometric and signal timing improvements were found to be specifically warranted by this project, however. They include: 1. Williston Road & Kennedy Drive a) Reassignment of the northbound Kennedy Drive lane assignments so as to provide double left -turn lanes. b) Modification of the signal phasing so as to provide split northbound/southbound phasing. This, combined with the above, will provide protected left -turn phasing on these two approaches. 2. Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue a) Construction of a northbound exclusive right -turn lane on Kennedy Drive. The effect of the above improvements at these two intersections will be to substantially improve existing traffic congestion conditions and effectively mitigate any impacts created by this project. Similarly, any potential traffic safety impacts of this project will also be effectively mitigated by the above improvements. Overall, future traffic safety conditions within the study are of this evaluation will be significantly improved over existing conditions. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Thirteen We wish to thank you for this opportunity to be of service. We remain available to present the results of this evaluation to state and local officials. Should you have any questions, or if we may be of additional assistance, please feel free to contact US. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Ro� Dickinson, P.E. cc. w/ enclosure John Osgood Susan Haitsma Richard Spokes FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services APPENDIX A PROJECTED PEAK HOUR DISTRIBUTIONS OF PROJECT —GENERATED TRAFFIC FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 /3 JOB ' /0061 SHEET NO. + Of CALCULATED 6Y `� S� DATE CHECKED eY DATE SCALE n 7'C/JK /coax?, 7,_0P F80 W 2061 Kees Mc.. Cmm. M— 01411. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 JOB %'E>/ r/ /S SHEET NO. Ig Of J0 CALCULATED BY " DATE _ %U CHECKED BBY)) I / DATE !'� SCALE //1i PEOaK IY6)tt).' T)s?IP_ ,y1,S-Fk9/R t jopJ pm=mtt nrta 'K. Gaak um oun. APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR INTERSECTIONS Signalized Unsignalized Level of Vehicular Delay Reserve Capacity Service (sec/veh) (veh/hour) A 0 - 5 >400 B 5 - 15 300 - 400 C 15 - 25 200 - 300 D 25 - 40 100 - 200 E 40 - 60 0 - 100 F >60 <0 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-15-90 TIME .......... 1990 AM DHV CONMENT....... W.'0 PROJECT __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 14 252 148 228 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 11.0 L 11.0 TH 801 630 122 149 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 R 11.0 TR 11.0 RT 206 173 397 25 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 13.6 3 WB 1.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 13'6 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 14.5 3 SD -1.00 2.00 N __________________________________________________________________________ 0 0 0.90 20 N 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 ' PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SD LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.827 0.522 16.8 C 16.8 C WB L 1.513 0.522 * * * * TR 0.960 0.522 31.3 D NB LT 0.523 0.411 15.9 C 18.0 C R 0.710 0.411 19.5 C SB L 3.281 0.411 * * * * TR 0.277 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.411 13.4 B INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 2.292 LOS = * 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-15-90 TIME .......... 1775 AM D||V COMMENT ....... W/O PROJECT __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUME8 : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 17 294 173 266 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 11.0 L 11.0 TH 935 736 142 174 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 R 11.0 TR 11.0 RT 240 202 464 29 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 13.6 3 WB 1.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 13.6 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 14.5 3 SB -1.00 __________________________________________________________________________ 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH 'X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X AT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 1.175 0.522 113.8 F 113.8 F WB L 2.752 0.522 * * * * TR 1.121 0.522 85.9 F NB LT 0.639 0.411 18.0 C 22.0 C R 0.830 0.411 24.8 C SB L 3.828 0.411 * * * * TR 0.323 0.411 13.8 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 3.226 LOS = * . 0 0 A: C, CL _j �u cu �u i7i t:Q E 10 uj LL_ z z x x x x x x LL, f3 L! cc, Cu 1711 1 X T- Cl� Lj 0 in n LU 77 ccl eu ru.. ou. i W Uj )k Z j:Q rn z4- e:: cr- C. iz rn u� T! LLI x el" z LL! LU <Z Ld 7' Li .5 >K "K X re n. 7 LL U J C- 0 M: 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY/AIRPORT DRIVES AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1993 AM DHV COMMENT ....... W/O PROJECT -__..... .... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... VOLUMES ..... ..... _.... .... .... ........ : ..... .... ..... ..... _________________________________________ GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 16 281 165 254 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 893 703 136 167 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 229 193 443 28 : TR 14.0 TR 14.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDG PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.3 3 WB 1.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.3 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.8 3 SB -1.00 2.00 --- ----------------- __ N 0 ---------- 0 0.90 ----------------------------- 20 N 19.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS _____________ CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT 'X TH X X TH X RT X X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X X TH X RT X X RT x PD X PD X GREEN 15.0 19.0 6.0 0.0 GREEN 11.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 5.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.114 0.089 28.7 D 34.7 D TR 0.997 0.356 34.8 D WB L 0.944 0.189 53.7 E 22.0 C TR 0.625 0.456 12.5 B NB L 0.721 0.144 34.8 D 33.3 D T 0.565 0.144 25.0 D R 0.942 0.333 35.3 D SB L 0.933 0.178 52.6 E 41.2 E TR 0.696 0.178 26.3 D _________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 31.0 ------------------------------------- (sec/veh) V/C = 1.168 LOS = D [a 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY/AIRPORT DRIVES AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 AM DHV COMMENT ....... W/ PROJECT . ------------ VOLUMES -------------------------------------------------------- : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 16 281 172 254 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 893 703 138 177 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 279 193 443 28 : TR 14.0 TR 14.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.3 3 WB 1.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.3 3 NO 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.8 3 SB -1.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 19.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 1:::11.1-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 P1-1-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X X TH X RT X X ' RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X X TH X X TH X X RT X X RT x X PD X PD X GREEN 15.0 19.0 6.0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 ----------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE _____________________ LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.114 0.089 28.7 D 46.7 E TR 1.047 0.356 47.0 E WB L 0.944 0.189 53.7 E 22.0 C TR 0.625 0.456 12.5 B NO L 0.891 0.222 50.2 E 25.7 D T 0.372 0.222 19.4 C R 0.765 0.411 18.1 C SB L 0.558 0.356 20.0 C 17.3 C TR 0.366 0.356 14.0 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 30.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.786 LOS = D 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY/AIRPORT DRIVES AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 AM DHV COMMENT ....... W/ PROJECT ..... ..... _..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... VOLUMES ..... ..... ... ..... ... ..... ... ..... ____________________________________________________ :' GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 16 281 172 254 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 893 703 138 177 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 279 193 443 28 : TR 14.0 TR 14.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUGTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.3 3 WB 1.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.3 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.8 3 SB -1.00 __________________________________________________________________________ 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 19.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X X TH X RT X X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X X TH X RT X X RT X PI) X PI) X GREEN 15.0 19.0 6.0 0.0 GREEN 11.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 5.0 5.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.114 0.089 28.7 D 46.7 E TR 1.047 0.356 47.0 E WB L O.944 0.189 53.7 E 22.0 C TR 0.625 0.456 12.5 B NB L 0.752 0.144 36.5 D . 33.7 D T 0.573 0.144 25.2 D R 0.942 0.333 35.3 D SB L 0.933 0.178 52.6 E 41.4 E TR __________________________________________________________________________ 0.731 0.178 27.5 D INTERSECTION: Delay = 35.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.189 LOS = D 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-15-90 TIME .......... 1990 PM DHV COMMENT ....... W/O PROJECT __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 19 308 248 305 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 11.0 L 11.0 TH 709 842 132 140 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 R 12.0 TR 11.0 RT 154 347 359 85 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.0 3 WB 1.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.0 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 19.8 3 SB -1.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 19.8 3 -------------------------------------------------- �_______________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.256 0.522 9.4 B 44.2 E TR 1.020 0.522 45.0 E WB LTR 1.707 0.522 * * * * NB LT 0.841 0.411 27.0 D 22.3 C R 0.623 0.411 17.4 C SB L 4.389 0.411 * * N. * TR 0.373 0.411 14.2 B ---------------------------------- w ----------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 2.889 LOS = * 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY/AIRPORT DRIVES AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ' ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 PM DHV COMMENT ....... W/O PROJECT __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 21 343 276 341 : L 12.0 L 12.0 LT 11.0 L 11.0 TH 791 939 147 156 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 R 12.0 TR 11.0 RT 172 387 401 95 : 14.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE AV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 13.9 3 WB 1.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 13.9 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 14.5 3 SB -1.00 2.00 --------------------------------- N 0 0 0.90 20 N ------------------------------------------ 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 P1 1-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH PH-3 P1 1-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------------------ ____________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.283 0.522 9.7 B 93.1 F TR 1.138 0.522 94.9 F WB L 4.652 0.522 * * * * TR 1.605 0.522 * * NB LT 0.984 0.411 48.6 E 34.2 D R 0.696 0.411 19.0 C SB L 4.907 0.411 * * * * TR 0.416 0.411 14.6 B __--------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 4.765 LOS = * ___ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY/AIRPORT DRIVES AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON ' DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 PM DHV COMMENT ....... __________________________________________________________________________ W/O PROJECT VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 21 343 276 341 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 791 939 147 156 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 172 387 401 95 : TR 14.0 TR 14.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 13.9 3 WB 1.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 13.9 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 14.5 3 SD -1.00 __________________________________________________________________________ 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 14.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X X TH X RT X X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X X TH X X TH X X RT x X RT X X PD X PD X GREEN 17.0 15.0 6.0 0.0 GREEN 21.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 5.0 5.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.149 0.089 28.8 D ' 33.0 D TR 0.974 0.311 33.1 D WB L 1.031 0.211 73.2 F 37.7 D TR 0.985 0.433 28.9 D NB L 1.396 0.256 * * * * T 0.345 0.256 17.8 C R 0.610 0.467 12.5 B SB L 0.720 0.378 25.9 D 20.7 C TR __________________________________________________________________________ 0.438 0.378 13.8 B INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 0.774 LOS = * 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY/AIRPORT DRIVES AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 PM DHV COMMENT ....... W/O PROJECT __________________________________________________________________________ VOLU!*,1ES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 21 343 276 341 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 791 939 147 156 : T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 172 387 401 95 : TR 14.0 TR 14.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb ' Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 17.5 3 WB 1.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 17.5 3 N8 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 21.3 3 SB -1.00 2.00 __________________________________________________________________________ N 0 0 0.90 20 N 21.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 P1-2 1"11 -1 1:",1-+-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X K TH X RT X X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X X TH X RT X X R-I*' X PD X PD X GREEN 17.0 15.0 6.0 0.0 GREEN 11.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 5.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.149 0.089 28.8 D 33.0 D TR 0.974 0.311 33.1 D WB L 1.031 0.211 ' 73.2 F 37.7 D TR 0.985 0.433 28.9 D NB L 0.905 0.144 52.6 E 35.7 D LT 0.911 0.144 45.1 E R 0.799 0.356 21.9 C SB L 1.113 0.200 107.3 F 75.1 F TR 0.829 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.200 31.5 D INTERSECTION: Delay = 41.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.186 LOS = E 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS . SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY/AIRPORT DRIVES AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 PM DHV COMMENT ....... __________________________________________________________________________ W/ PROJECT VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 21 343 824 341 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 791 939 157 158 : T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 181 387 401 95 : TR 14.0 TR 14.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 --- ---------- ------- --------- : 12.0 12.0 -------------------------- 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------ _______ GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 17.5 3 WB 1.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 17.5 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 21.3 3 SB -1.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 21.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 P1-+-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 1*'-"H-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X X TH X RT X X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X X TH X RT K X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 17.0 15.0 6.0 0.0 GREEN 11.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 ----------------------------------------------------- 5.0 5.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE _____________________ LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.149 0.089 28.8 D 34.7 D TR 0.984 0.311 34.8 D WB L 1.031 0.211 73.2 F 37.7 D TR 0.985 0.433 28.9 D NB L 1.062 0.144 94.9 F 53.2 E LT 1.005 0.144 63.4 F R 0.799 0.356 21.9 C SB L 1.113 0.200 107.3 F 75.2 F TR 0.835 0.200 31.9 D ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... .... ..... ..... _______________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 45.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.189 LOS = E 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ****************x**************************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR............'.......' 1 AREA POPULATION..........'',.'''.''.. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...'..... KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... KENNEDY DR. NAME OF THE ANALYST.............'.... R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).''.'' 5-15-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1990 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT INTERSECTION _____________________________________________________________________ TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------- _------------------------ EB WB NB SB LEFT 54 117 12 311 THRU 10 1 423 363 RIGHT 54 114 188 8 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ -------- LANES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE L + TR L + TR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE _______ __________ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION ' AND RV'S ___________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND _____________ 0 0 --------------- 0 WESTBOUND 5 2 0 NORTHBOUND 5 2 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 . 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------- __________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KENNEDY DR. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-15-90 ; 1990 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS _______ p ________ M _________ ____________ SH R IS ____________ ----- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 54 111 51 51 -3 F THROUGH 10 160 87 > 87 > 77 > E RIGHT 54 698 698 > 332 698 > 268 644 >C A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 122 137 68 68 -54 F THROUGH 1 181 98 > 98 > 97 > E RIGHT 119 584 584 > 560 584 > 440 465 >A A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 325 608 608 608 283 C NB LEFT 13 803 803 803 791 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KENNEDY DR. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-15-90 ; 1990 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT . 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.................'... 1 AREA POPULATION......''.''.''....'... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.....''.. KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET...'... KENNEDY DR. NAME OF THE ANALYST............'''... R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)'',... 5-15-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1990 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _ ____ LEFT 18 237 30 ___..... 87 THRU 5 4 481 465 RIGHT 19 236 107 55 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ LANES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE L + TR L + TR ^ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ------ -------------------------------------------------- _____________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE _______ ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 __________ 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ . % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV`S ___________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EAST BOUND 0 _____________ 0 ----------------- 0 WESTBOUND 5 2 0 NORTHBOUND 5 2 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table ______________ 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KENNEDY DR. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-15-90 ; 1990 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... _____ ____________ ____________ ------- MINOR STREEl EB LEFT 18 107 60 60 42 E THROUGH 5 185 162 > 162 > 157 > D RIGHT 19 602 602 > 385 602 > 361 583 >B A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 248 153 130 130 -118 F THROUGH 4 193 169 > 169 > 165 > D RIGHT 247 572 572 > 550 572 > 299 325 >C B MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 91 625 625 625 534 A NB LEFT 31 679 679 679 648 A YING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KENNEDY DR. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-15-90 ; 1990 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT . . . . - ^ ^ ` 1985 HCU: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... INFORMATION ..... ..... ______... ..... ..... ..... .... ... ..... ..... .... ____..... .... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR...............'..... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... KENNEDY DR. NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/d6/yy)...... 5-31-00 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED...............,. 1995 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH ' CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ... ------------------------------------- _____________________ EB WB NB SB ..... ..... ... ... ____ ..... ..... __ ..... .... ..... _ LEFT 61 130 14 347 THRU 11 1 472 405 RIGHT 61 128 209 9 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB ' NB SB ..... ..... ..... .... __..... ... .... .... .... ..... .... ..... _______ _... ..... .... .... .... ..... LANES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE L + TR L + TR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE _______ __________ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _..... ..... ..... ..... _... ..... ..... ..... __..... .... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... __..... _..... .... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... _..... ... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... __________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ___________ _____________ 0 0 ----------------- 0 WESTBOUND 5 2 0 NORTHBOUND 5 2 0 SOUTHBOUHD 5 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS ..... ..... ..... ..... .... _..... ... ... ..... ... ..... ... _... ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... ________________________________________________ TADULAR VALU S ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ______________ ________ ___________ -------------- EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KENNEDY DR. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS ..... 5-31-90 ; 1995 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT CAPACITY AND _____________________________________________________________________ LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOG ..... ..... ..... ..... .... _..... p ........ .... _..... ..... ..... ..... M ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... SH ..... .... .... _..... .... .... ..... ... ..... R SH _______.... ..... ..... ..... ..... MINOR STREET EB LEFT 61 86 30 30 -31 F THROUGH 11 128 55 > 55 > 44 > E RIGHT 61 661 661 > 247 661 > 175 600 >D A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 136 109 42 42 -94 F THROUGH 1 148 64 > 64 > 63 > E RIGHT 134 542 542 > 512 542 > 377 408 >B A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 363 562 562 562 200 D NB LEFT 15 765 765 765 750 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KENNEDY DR. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-31-90 ; 1995 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...'''.,. KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... KENNEDY DR. NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5-31-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1995 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATIOH.... W/O PROJECT INTERSECTION __________________________________________------------------------------ TYPE AND CONTROL . INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES � _..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... .... EB WB NB SB ..... ..... ... _ ____ ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... _ LEFT 20 265 33 97 THRU 6 5 537 518 RIGHT 21 264 120 61 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------ ----------------------- ------------------ ------- ---------- _____ EB _______ LANES 2 LANE USAGE L + TR WB .... ..... NB ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ... .... ..... .... ..... 2 1 L + TR SB _______ 1 ^ � � ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ------- --- --- ---------------- ----- ___________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND _______ __________ 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUHD 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION .... ... ... .... .... .... .... ..... ..... .......... __________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATIOH AND RV'S ___________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUHD _____________ 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 5 ' 2 0 NORTHBOUND 5 2 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ______________ ________ ___________ --------------- EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ HAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KENNEDY DR. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-31-90 ; 1995 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT . CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... p ..... ... ... ... ... ..... ..... .... M _..... .... .... .... ..... ......... .... ..... ..... SH ... .... ..... .... _.... ..... ..... .... .... R SH ..... .... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... _ ..... .... _ MINOR STREET EB LEFT 20 83 39 39 19 E THROUGH 6 152 129 > 129 > 123 > D RIGHT 21 562 562 > 322 562 > 295 541 >C A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 277 126 102 102 -175 F THROUGH 5 159 135 > 135 > 130 > D RIGHT 276 527 527 > 500 527 > 219 251 >C C MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 101 578 578 578 477 A HD LEFT 34 632 632 632 597 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... KIMBALL/TREETOP NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KENNEDY DR. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-31-90 ; 1995 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT ^ "^ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR. AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-15-90 TIME .......... 1990 AM DHV COMMENT ....... W/O PROJECT __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 54 117 12 311 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 10 1 423 363 : R 10.0 R 11.0 TR 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 54 114 188 8 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------- : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 20.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 5.00 __________________________________________________________________________ N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X GREEN 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 26.0 20.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.533 0.222 26.5 D 22.1 C R 0.144 0.311 17.0 C WB LT 0.544 0.222 25.5 D 18.2 C R 0.188 0.467 10.7 B NB L 0.090 0.089 28.6 D 25.6 D TR 0.877 0.433 25.6 D SB L 0.848 0.244 35.3 D 20.2 C TR 0.374 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.589 7.5 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 22.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.787 LOS = C ` . ` 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR. AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-15-90 TIME .......... 1990 AM DHV COMMENT ....... W/ PROJECT __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 54 123 12 418 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 10 1 423 363 : R 10.0 R 11.0 TR 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 54 140 231 8 1 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSEP PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 20.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 __________________________________________________________________________ 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X GREEN 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 26.0 22.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.921 0.200 78.7 F 51.0 E R 0.155 0.289 18.1 C WB LT 0.658 0.200 30.2 D 20.0 C R 0.230 0.467 10.9 B NB L 0.090 0.089 28.6 D 33.4 D TR 0.946 0.433 33.5 D SB L 1.045 0.267 71.5 F 41.0 E TR __________________________________________________________________________ 0.360 0.611 6.7 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 35.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.970 LOS = D 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION� SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR. AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-15-90 TIME .......... 1990 AM DHV COMMENT ....... __________________________________________________________________________ W/ PROJECT VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 54 123 12 418 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 10 1 423 363 : R 10.0 R 11.0 T 12.0 TR 14.0 RT 54 140 231 8 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 20.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 __________________________________________________________________________ 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 P1 1-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH x X RT X RT X X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD . X GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 17.0 27.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.529 0.244 25.3 D 21.0 C R 0.134 0.333 15.9 C WB LT 0.513 0.244 23.7 C 15.0 B R 0.190 0.567 7.2 B NB L 0.090 0.089 28.6 D 24.7 C T 0.803 0.333 26.3 D R 0.578 0.300 21.7 C SB L 0.865 0.322 31.4 D 20.6 C TR ----- _____________________________________________________________________ 0.389 0.567 8.4 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 21.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.751 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR. AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSOH DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 AM DHV COMMENT ....... W/O PROJECT --------- _________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 61 130 14 347 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 11 1 472 405 : R 10.0 R 11.0 TR 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 61 128 209 9 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0' 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 20.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 5.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PI) X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PI) X GREEN 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 26.0 20.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0'0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.759 0.222 41.6 E 30.4 D R 0.162 0.311 17.1 C WB LT 0.654 0.222 28.8 D 19.9 C R 0.211 0.467 10.8 B NB L 0.105 0.089 28.7 D 38.8 D TR 0.977 0.433 39.0 D SB L 0.946 0.244 48.0 E 26.2 D TR 0.417 0.589 7.8 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 30.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.915 LOS = D 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR. AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 AM DHV COMMENT ....... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... _______________________________________________________________ W/O PROJECT VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 61 130 14 347 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 11 1 472 405 : R 10.0 R 11.0 T 12.0 TR 14.0 RT 61 128 209 9 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 20.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 P1-1 PH-2 PH-3 P11-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 17.0 27.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 ... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 0.0 _.... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... .... 0.0 _____________..... 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.� LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.597 0.244 27.6 D 22.3 C R 0.151 0.333 16.0 C WB LT 0.578 0.244 25.1 D 16.2 C R 0.173 0.567 7.1 B NB L 0.105 0.089 28.7 D 29.5 D T 0.896 0.333 33.4 D R 0.523 0.300 20.8 C SB L 0.718 0.322 23.6 C 15.5 C TR 0.434 0.567 8.7 B ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... _..... ..... _.... INTERSECTION: ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Delay = 21.4 ..... ..... __________________________________________ (sec/veh) V/C = 0.751 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR. AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 AM DHV COMMENT ....... W/ PROJECT __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 61 134 14 407 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 11 1 472 405 : R 10.0 R 11.0 TR 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 61 137 234 9 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 20.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 __________________________________________________________________________ 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X WB LT X ` SB LT ' X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD x GREEN 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 24.0 23.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 1.010 0.211 106.2 F 65.6 F R 0.168 0.300 17.7 C WB LT 0.726 0.211 33.2 D 21.5 C R 0.215 0.489 10.0 B NB L 0.105 0.069 28.7 D 68.4 F TR 1.072 0.411 69.1 F SB L 0.976 0.278 51.1 E 29.1 D TR ---- _-------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.410 0.600 7.4 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 45.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.028 LOS = E __ . 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR. AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 AM DHV COMMENT ....... .... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... ..... .... ..... _______________________________________________________________ W/ PROJECT ..... VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 61 134 14 407 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0. L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 11 1 472 405 : R 10.0 R 11.0 T 12.0 TR 14.0 RT 61 137 234 9 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 20.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 5.00 __________________________________________________________________________ N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 P1 1-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X X RT X ' RT X X PD X PD X GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 17.0 27.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 ------------------------------------------------------ 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE _--------- ______ ..... ___ LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.655 0.244 30.8 D 24.0 C R 0.151 0.333 16.0 C WB LT 0.598 0.244 25.6 D 16.3 C R 0.186 0.567 7.2 B NB L 0.105 0.089 28.7 D 29.5 D T 0.896 0.333 33.4 D R 0.586 0.300 21.8 C SB L 0.842 0.322 29.6 D 19.1 C TR 0.434 0.567 8.7 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 22.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.811 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR. AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-15-90 TIME .......... 1990 PM DHV COMMENT ....... W/O PROJECT __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 18 237 30 87 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 5 4 481 465 : R 10.0 R 11.0 TR 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 19 236 107 55 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : '12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 20.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 __________________________________________________________________________ 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 P1 1-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT K X PD X PI) X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PI) X GREEN 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 27.0 15.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EA-3 LT 0.353 0.267 21.5 C 18.3 C R 0.044 0.356 14.4 B WB LT 0.707 0.267 26.8 D 19.8 C R 0.398 0,456 12.6 B NB L 0.225 0.089 29.1 D 21.1 C TR 0.806 0.444 20.6 C SB L 0.307 0.189 24.1 C 12.8 B TR __--- --- 0.575 0.544 10.9 B ------------------ INTERSECTION: Delay ----------------------------------- = 17.8 (sec/veh) _____________ V/C =.0.672 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR. AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-15-90 TIME .......... 1990 PM DHV COMMENT ....... .... ... .... ....... ..... W/ PROJECT ..... .... .......... ________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 18 278 30 106 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 5 4 481 465 : R 10.0 R 11.0 TR 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 19 339 115 55 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 20.8 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SB 0.00 __________________________________________________________________________ 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 18.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH l( X RT X RT X X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X GREEN 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 27.0 15.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.353 0.267 21.5 C 18.3 Cl R 0.044 0.356 14.4 B WB LT 0.841 0.267 34.6 D 23.7 C R 0.571 0.456 14.6 B NB L 0.225 0.089 29.1 D 21.6 C TR 0.818 0.444 21.2 C SB L 0.374 0.189 24.6 C 13.2 B TR 0.575 0.544 10.9 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 19.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.772 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR., AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 PM DHV COMMENT ....... W/O PROJECT -------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES : 1 ------------------------- GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NO SB LT 20 265 33 97 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 6 5 537 518 : R 10.0 R 11.0 TR 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 21 264 120 61 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 --------- ------------------------------------------ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ----------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ________ GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm N6 Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 15.3 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 15.3 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 13.3 3 SB 0.00 5.00 __________________________________________________________________________ N 0 0 0.90 20 N 13.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X' PD X WB LT X SB LT x TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X GREEN 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 27.0 15.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 ----------------------------------------------------- 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 _---------- LEVEL OF SERVICE _________..... ..... LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.397 0.267 22.3 C 18.8 C R 0.049 0.356 14.5 B WB LT 0.810 0.267 32.2 D 22.7 C R 0.445 0.456 13.0 B NB L 0.247 0.089 29.2 D 27.1 D TR 0.901 0.444 27.0 D SB L 0.342 0.189 24.3 C 13.7 B TR 0.640 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.544 11.9 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 21.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.757 LOS = C , 1985 HCH: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIMBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR. AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 PM DHV COMMENT ....... __________________________________________________________________________ W/ PROJECT VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 20 288 33 108 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 6 5 537 518 : R 10.0 R 11.0 TR 14.0 TR 14.0 RT 21 322 124 61 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 --------------- ------- : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ____________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 15.3 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 15.3 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 13.3 3 SB 0.00 ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _______________________________________________________________ 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 13.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X GREEN 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 25.0 16.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.397 0.278 21.8 C 18.3 C R 0.047 0.367 14.0 B WB LT 0.854 0.278 35.1 D 23.5 C R 0.518 0.478 13.0 B NB L 0.247 0.069 29.2 D 35.0 D TR 0.954 0.422 35.3 D . SB L 0.360 0.200 23.9 C 14.3 B TR --------------------------------------------------- 0.653 0.533 12.5 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 24.2 (sec/veh) V/C = --------------------- 0.802 LOS = C ____ ^ ^. 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..KIHBALL/TREETOP/KENNEDY DR., AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. DICKINSON DATE .......... 5-31-90 TIME .......... 1995 PM DHV COMMENT ....... W/ PROJECT ------------------------------------------ VOLUMES : ---- ---------- __________________ GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 20 288 33 108 : LT 10.0 LT 11.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 6 5 537 518 : R 10.0 R 11.0 T 12.0 TR 14.0 RT 21 322 124 61 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _..... ..... ... _..... .... ... ..... .... __..... __... ..... ..... ..... ..... : ____________________________________________________ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.85 0 N 15.3 3 WB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 15.3 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 13.3 3 GB 0.00 5.00 ____________________________________________________________________ N 0 0 0.90 20 N 13.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS' ----- CYCLE LENGTH = ----- ---- ---- ---- _ 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 1:::11 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X Ti X TH X X RT X RT X X . PD X PD X GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 23.0 16.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.397 0.300 20.8 C 17.3 C R 0.045 0.389 13.0 B WB LT 0.791 0.300 28.9 D 20.0 C R 0.495 0.500 11.8 B NB L 0.247 0.089 29.2 D 23.8 C T 0.850 0.400 25.5 D R 0.254 0.367 15.2 C SB L 0.360 0.200 .23.9 C 15.5 C TR 0.681 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.511 14.0 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 19.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.732 LGS = C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR...........''''''''.. 1 AREA POPULATION..........,...'....... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SHUNPIKE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST...............''. R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy),..'.. 5-11-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1990 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT INTERSECTION _____________________________________________________________________ TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SD ____ ____ ____ LEFT 34 23 6 10 THRU 922 1064 3 0 RIGHT 17 14 31 12 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ -------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE. - GRADE ANGLE _______ __________ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90' 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ___________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND _____________ 5 3 ---------------- 0 WESTBOUND 5 3 0 NORTHBOUND 5 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 SD 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 WB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 SB 6.30 6.30 . 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 SB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-11-90 ; 1990 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ------- MINOR STREE NB LEFT 6 83 73 THROUGH 3 103 93 RIGHT 32 339 339 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 10 83 70 THROUGH 0 103 93 RIGHT 12 281 281 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 36 350 350 WB LEFT 24 413 413 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION > 73 > 67 > E > 194 93 > 153 90 >D E > 339 > 307 > B > 70 > > 118 93 > > 281 > 350 413 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-11-90 ; 1990 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT 59 > E 95 93 >E E 268 > C 314 B 389 B 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET...'''. SHUNPIKE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST............'''''' R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5-11-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1995 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT INTERSECTION _____________________________________________________________________ TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT 43 30 7 13 THRU 1177 1358 4 0 RIGHT 22 18 40 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SD _______ _______ _______ -------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE _______ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND __________ 0.00 90 ' ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ___________ _____________ 5 3 ----------------- 0 WESTBOUND 5 3 0 NORTHBOUND 5 0 0 SOUTHBDUND 5 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ --------------- NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 8B 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 WB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS . NB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 SB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 SB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-11-90 ; 1995 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ..... .... ..... ..... .... .... .... ... ..... ..... ----- _________ ____________ ____________ ----- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 7 83 64 THROUGH 4 103 84 RIGHT 41 239 239 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 13 83 58 THROUGH 0 103 84 RIGHT 15 186 186 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 45 238 238 WB LEFT 32 299 299 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION > 64 > 57 > E > 157 84 > 105 80 >D E > 239 > 198 > D > 58 > > 92 84 > > ` 186 > 238 299 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-11-90 ; 1995 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT 45 > E 63 84 >E E 170 > D 193 D 268 C 1985 HEM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SHUNPIKE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST.............'..'' R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5-11-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1990 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT INTERSECTION ------------------------------------------------------ TYPE AND CONTROL _______________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT 36 50 5 17 THRU 1050 1245 2 0 RIGHT 62 13 15 39 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND _______ __________ 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV`S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ___________ 5 _____________ 3 ----------------- 0 WESTBOUND 5 3 0 NORTHBOUND 5 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ ------------- NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.10 5.10 ' 0.00 5.10 WB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 SB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 SB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-11-90 ; 1990 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT CAPACITY AND LEVEL —OF _____________________________________________________________________ —SERVICE Page-3 POTEN— ACTUAL FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOG _______ p ________ M _________ SH R Sid ____________ ____________ ----- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 5 83 59 THROUGH 2 103 84 RIGHT 15 277 277 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 17 83 65 THROUGH 0 103 84 RIGHT 40 220 220 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 38 279 279 WB LEFT 53 336 336 [DENTIFYING INFORMATION > 59 > 54 > E > 135 84 > 113 82 >D E > 277 > 262 > C > 65 > > 127 84 > > 220 > 279 336 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-11-90 ; 1990 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT . 47 > E 70 84 >E E 180 > D 241 C 283 C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.....,..'''',........ 1 AREA POPULATIOH...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SHUNPIKE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mmldd/yy)...... 5-11-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1995 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT INTERSECTION _____________________________________________________________________ TYPE AND CONTROL INTERGECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB ____ WB NB SB LEFT 46 ____ ____ 63 6 22 THRU 1340 1589 3 0 RIGHT 79 17 19 50 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ -------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ' ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE _______ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND __________ 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ___________ 5 _____________ 3 ----------------- 0 WESTBOUND 1" 3 0 NORTHBOUND 5 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ______________ ________ ___________ NB 5.70 5.70 ' 0.00 5.70 SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 WB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 SB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 SB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-11-90 ; 1995 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF _____________________________________________________________________ -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS _______ p ________ M _________ SH R SH ____________ ____________ ----- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 6 83 THROUGH 3 103 RIGHT 19 182 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 23 83 THROUGH 0 103 RIGHT 51 134 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 49 177 WB LEFT 66 225 :DENTIFYING INFORMATION 35 > 35 > 29 > E 63 > 87 63 > 58 60 >E E 182 > 182 > 163 > D 47 > 47 > 24 > E 63 > 85 63 > 12 63 >E E 134 > 134 > 82 > E 177 177 128 D 225 225 159 D NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET, ..... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-11-90 ; 1995 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/O PROJECT ' 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...'''... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STRE[T'....', SHUNPIKE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5-16-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1990 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------ _____________________ EB ____ WB NB SB LEFT 34 ____ ..... ..... ..... _ ____ 46 6 10 THRU 922 1064 3 0 RIGHT 17 14 34 12 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ' -------------------------------------- --------------- -------- ---- ____ EB WB NB SB _..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... _..... .... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ... _..... ..... .... ... _____ LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE _______ ANGLE __________ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND ___________ RV`S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 _____________ 3 ----------------- 0 WESTBOUND 5 3 0 NORTHBOUND 5 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ ' TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ -------------- NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 WB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 SB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 SB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION j --------------------------- NAME ------------------------------------------- OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-16-90 ; 1990 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT CAPACITY AND LEVEL —OF —SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN— ACTUAL FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ---- MINOR STREE NB LEFT 6 83 THROUGH 3 103 RIGHT 35 339 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 10 83 THROUGH 0 103 RIGHT 12 281 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 36 350 WB LEFT 49 413 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 70 89 339 66 89 281 350 413 > 70 > 64 > E > 196 89 > 152 86 >D E > 339 > 304 > B > 66 > > 114 89 > > 281 > 350 413 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-16-90 ; 1990 AM DHV OTHER IHFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT 56 > E 91 89 >E E 268 > C 314 B 365 B y 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------ _______________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......,. WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SHUNPIKE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5-16-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1995 AM DHV OTHER INFORHATION.... W/ PROJECT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES � _____________________________________________________________________ EB ____ WB NB SB LEFT 43 ____ ____ 53 7 13 THRU 1177 1358 4 0 RIGHT 22 18 43 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB LANES 1 LANE USAGE WB _______ NB _______ 1 1 LTR SB 1 L T R ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _____________________________________________________________________ Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE _______ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS __________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES ___________ % MOTORCYCLES _____________ EASTBOUND 5 3 0 WESTBOUND 5 3 0 NORTHBOUND 5 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 ' 0 CRITICAL GAPS _... ..... ..... __________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ --------------- NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 WB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 SB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 SB 6.80 ' 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-16-90 ; 1995 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL ' FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R GH _______ ________ --------- ____________ ____________ ----- MINOR STREE' NB LEFT 7 83 60 THROUGH 4 103 78 RIGHT 44 239 239 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 13 83 53 THROUGH 0 103 78 RIGHT 15 186 186 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 45 238 238 WB LEFT 56 299 299 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION > 60 > 52 > E > 155 78 > 100 74 >E E > 239 > 195 > D > 53 > > 86 78 > > 186 > 238 299 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-16-90 ; 1995 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT 40 > E 58 78 >E E 170 > D 193 D 244 C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ . AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION..''''''''''''''''' 1s0000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET....'''.. WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SHUNPIKE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST........'......... R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).'.,'. 5-16-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1990 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT INTERSECTION _____________________________________________________________________ TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SD LEFT 36 54 5 17 THRU 1050 1245 2 0 RIGHT 62 13 37 39 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND _______ __________ 0.00 90 ________________ 0 2 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV`S VEHICLES ___________ % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND _____________ 5 3 ---------------- 0 WESTBOUND 5 3 0 NORTHBOUND 5 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ______________ ________ ___________ -------------- NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 WB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 GB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 SB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS ..... 5-16-90 ; 1990 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE ' Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ..... .... .... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... _.... ... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... .... __..... .... _..... .... ..... ..... ... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... .... ..... _..... MINOR STREET NB LEFT 5 83 58 > THROUGH 2 103 83 > 181 RIGHT 38 277 277 > MINOR STREET SB LEFT 17 83 60 > THROUGH 0 103 83 > 122 RIGHT 40 220 220 > MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 38 279 279 WB LEFT 57 336 336 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 58 > 53 > E 83 > 136 81 >D E 277 > 239 > C 60 > 83 > 220 > 279 336 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-16-90 ; 1990 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT 43 > E 64 83 >E E 180 > D 241 C 279 C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 **************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SHUNPIKE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST..........''...... R. DICKINSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).,..,. 5-16-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1995 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT INTERSECTION _____________________________________________________________________ TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT 46 67 6 22 THRU 1340 1589 3 0 RIGHT 79 17 41 50 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ EB LANES 1 LANE USAGE WB NB _______ _______ 1 1 LTR ADJUSTMENT _____________________________________________________________________ FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE _______ __________ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ___________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ------------- 5 3 --------------- 0 WESTBOUND 5 3 0 NORTHBOUND 5 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ ---------------- NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 WB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS ' NB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 SB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 SB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-16-90 ; 1995 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH .... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _.... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... .... .... ..... ..... __________ ____________ ..... ..... ..... MINOR STREET NB LEFT 6 83 34 THROUGH 3 103 62 RIGHT 42 182 182 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 23 83 41 THROUGH 0 103. 62 RIGHT 51 134 134 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 49 177 177 WB LEFT 71 225 225 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION > 34 > 28 ":- > 111 62 > 60 59 >E E > 182 > 140 > D > 41 > > 79 62 > > 134 > 177 225 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... WILLISTON ROAD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SHUNPIKE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5-16-90 ; 1995 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... W/ PROJECT 18 > E 5 62 >E E 82 > E 128 D 154 D t 212 00 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 14, 1995 Chip Hart South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership 252 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: INS Building, 70 Kimball Avenue Dear Chip: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that your request to install additional building mounted lights as described in your letter dated 6/13/95 is hereby approved. The fixtures you propose to install meet the City's requirement for downcasting, shielded fixtures and is therefore consistent with the Planning Commission's original site plan approval. I understand that the lights (WD18D2's and WD18D4's) will consist of 250 watt bulbs. Sin erWe Jo Weith, Ci y Planner JW/mcp cc: Dick Ward Raymond Belair State of Vermont ;~.. � a Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council July 29, 1992 Daniel J. & Leo O'Brien P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 =NS AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Phone #(802) 879-6563 Re: Case WW-4-0282; United States Immigration and Naturalization Service Building, Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, Vt. Dear Gentlemen: On May 4, 1992, this office received an inspection report by Michael J. Burke, P.E., of Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 30,1992. Included with the report was two copies of as -built plans for the sewer and water services. The as -built plans show minor changes to the location of the sanitary sewer service but also shows the installation of anew drop manhole. The drop manhole was not shown on the plans stamped approved and referenced in our permit WW-4-0282. Therefore, I feel we should amend our permit to reflect the actual sewer alignment and new drop manhole. Enclosed, please find an application form to be completed and submitted to this office with an application fee of $100.00 and two copies of the detail sheet for the drop manhole. We will not need two copies of the site plan as Mr. Burke has already submitted these plans with his inspection report. Should you have any questions, please contact this office. CC: City of South Burlington Act 250 Commission #4 Krebs & Lansing Consulting Sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Engineers, Inc. Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/IV. Springfield/St. Johnsbury I.N.S. Partnership O'Brien Brothers Osgood - Hart Properties 1855 Williston Road So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 802/658-5000 June 25, 1990 Mr. William Burgess, Chairman So. Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sidewalk Agreement, I.N.S. Building Site Plan Application, Kimball Ave./Business Park North Dear Mr. Burgess: Based on recent discussions among Mssrs. Weith, Symanski and Audette and ourselves, it is agreed that the developers and owners of the affected lots along Kimball Avenue will contribute to the sidewalk fund in consideration of the City building said sidewalk. More particularly, it is agreed among the parties set forth below that the following should be incorporated in the I.N.S. Site Plan Approval: 1. That the I.N.S. Partnership will pay into the City's sidewalk fund the sum of $13,800 which includes the total frontage of Lots 1 and 2 of Business Park North -920 feet at $15 per foot. The payment is due on or before March 1, 1991. 2. That Osgood - Hart Properties will pay into the City's sidewalk fund the sum of $3,570 which includes the frontage of Lot 11 of Business Park North - 238 feet at $15 per foot. The payment is due on or before March 1, 1991. 3. That the developers of Lots 3 and 4 of Business Park North will pay into the City's sidewalk fund at the rate of $15 per foot for the length of each lot's frontage (a total of 735 feet or $11,025) on Kimball Avenue, which payment(s) will be made no later than the issuance of certificate(s) of occupancy. 4. That the City of So. Burlington will construct, to City specifications, at its expense, a sidewalk along Kimball Avenue from the end of the sidewalk on Lot 5 in front of Lots 11, 4 and 3 through the northerly entrance of the Sidewalk Agreement - I.N.S. Project June 25, 1990 Page 2 I.N.S. project on Lot 2 of Business Park North. Construction of the sidewalk is to be completed within 30 days of occupancy of the I.N.S. building, said occupancy anticipated to be July, 1991. 5. That the foregoing events are conditioned on the I.N.S. Partnership obtaining all governmental approvals necessary for construction of the project and the project being constructed. We agree to that which is contained herein. I.N.S. Partnership Partner Osgood - Hart Properties By: —� Partner O'Brien Brothers By: -- Partner I.N.S. Partnership O'Brien Brothers Osgood - Hart Properties 1855 Williston Road So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 802/658-5000 June 25, 1990 Mr. William Burgess, Chairman So. Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sidewalk Agreement, I.N.S. Building Site Plan Application, Kimball Ave./Business Park North Dear Mr. Burgess: Based on recent discussions among Mssrs. Weith, Symanski and Audette and ourselves, it is agreed that the developers and owners of the affected lots along Kimball Avenue will contribute to the sidewalk fund in consideration of the City building said sidewalk. More particularly, it is agreed among the parties set forth below that the following should be incorporated in the I.N.S. Site Plan Approval: 1. That the I.N.S. Partnership will pay into the City's sidewalk fund the sum of $13,800 which includes the total frontage of Lots 1 and 2 of Business Park North -920 feet at $15 per foot. The payment is due on or before March 1, 1991. 2. That Osgood - Hart Properties will pay into the City's sidewalk fund the sum of $3,570 which includes the frontage of Lot 11 of Business Park North - 238 feet at $15 per foot. The payment is due on or before March 1, 1991. 3. That the developers of Lots 3 and 4 of Business Park North will pay into the City's sidewalk fund at the rate of $15 per foot for the length of each lot's frontage (a total of 735 feet or $11,025) on Kimball Avenue, which payment(s) will be made no later than the issuance of certificate(s) of occupancy. 4. That the City of So. Burlington will construct, to City specifications, at its expense, a sidewalk along Kimball Avenue from the end of the sidewalk on Lot 5 in front of Lots 11, 4 and 3 through the northerly entrance of the Sidewalk Agreement - I.N.S. Project June 25, 1990 Page 2 I.N.S. project on Lot 2 of Business Park North. Construction of the sidewalk is to be completed within 30 days of occupancy of the I.N.S. building, said occupancy anticipated to be July, 1991. 5. That the foregoing events are conditioned on the I.N.S. Partnership obtaining all governmental approvals necessary for construction of the project and the project being constructed. We agree to that which is contained herein. I.N.S. Partnership /� By : �l��C�'��,��zz �� -,� l Partner Osgood - Hart Properties By: Partner O'Brien Brothers Partner NORTH CouNTRY LANDSCAPING INC. P.O. BOX 2272 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05407 (802) 658-5050 June 21, 1990 Chip Hart Osgood/Hart Properties 252 College Street Burlington, Vt 05401 PLANT LIST: P R O P O S A L NLS BUILDIN6 12 Red Maple 2-2.5" 52 Halka Honeylocust 2.5-3" 100 Sargent Juniper 15-18" 8 Flowering Crabapple 2.5-3" 3 Park Center Crabapple 2.5-3" 1 Specimen Crabapple 3-3.5" Specimen 8 White Spruce 8-10, 12 White Spruce 6-7' 4 White Spruce 5-6' 8 Austrian Pine 8-10, 21 Austrian Pine 6-7' 20 PJM Rhododendron 30-36" B&B 4 Redmond Linden 2-5-3" 10 Dense Yew 30-36" B&B 13 Hetz Juniper 24-30" 18 Red Twig Dogwood 3-4' B&B Please note that some money alotted for lawn work Total Cost of Project 1 $47,500.00 DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS 5 E r EMBER THIS DECLARATION made as of this Ia day of Aiaguat, 1990, by LEO O'BRIEN, JR. and DANIEL J. O'BRIEN of South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter referred to as "Declarants"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the Declarants are the fee simple owners of Lots 1 and 2 of the Business Park North Subdivision, so-called, as depicted on a plan entitled "Final Plan Business Park North, Civil Engineering Associates, Shelburne, VT" dated August 1978 and recorded in Volume 153 at Page 71 of the City of South Burlington Land Records ("Lots"); and WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission approved a boundary line revision between Lots 1 and 2 on June 26, 1990; and WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission on June 26, 1990 also approved a Site Plan for construction of an office building on the revised Lot No. 2; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the site plan approval of the Planning Commission, the two curb cuts located on Lot 2 shall be shared by both Lots 1 and 2; and WHEREAS, the two Lots will also share common parking lot aisles; and WHEREAS, the two curb cuts on Lot 2 and the common parking aisles on Lots 1 and 2 are depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan/Lighting Plan -United States Immigration and Naturalization Service -Lot 2 Business Park North, Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, VTI' by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Incorporated, dated April 1990 and last revised August 23, 1990 (Plan); and 'OKES, FOLEY is PETERSON )RNEYS AT LAW IN6TON, VERMONT WHEREAS, the Declarants wish to establish the necessary easements to implement the conditions of the Planning Commission's site plan approval. NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarants hereby declare that the Lots shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the following easements, which shall run with the Lots and be binding upon all persons having any right, title or interest in the Lots, their heirs, successors and assigns, and which shall inure to the benefit of the owner of each Lot. 1. Lot 2 is hereby subjected to an easement and right of way for the benefit of Lot 1 for ingress and egress between Lot 1 and Kimball Avenue over, upon and through those areas identified on the Plan as "Curb cuts for Lots 1 & 2" and "Access to Lot 1 over Lot 2." The easement and right of way herein established shall be used in common by Lots 1 and 2. The costs of all maintenance, repair and replacement of the easement areas shall be borne solely by the owner of Lot 2. 2. Lots 1 and 2 are hereby subjected to an easement and right of way for the common benefit of Lots 1 and 2 over, upon and through those areas depicted on the Plan as "Common parking aisles for Lots 1 & 2" to be used by each solely for parking aisle purposes. The owner of each Lot shall pay the costs of maintenance, repair and replacement of that portion of the common parking aisles located on its Lot. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Leo O'Brien, Jr. has executed this instrument Sk-PT-Em.8EF- this (0 day of Augu-&t, 1990. IN THE PRESENCE OF: ,POKES. FOLEY & PETERSON 'ORNEYS AT LAW LINOTON. VERMONT LEO O'BRIEN, JR. WX SPOKES, FOLEY & PETERSON TORNEYS AT LAW RLINOTON, VERMONT STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, ss. ;�4� �l� AtLlll�.tr�C/�C) 1 on the L� day of %))��""l 1990, LEO O'BRIEN JR personally appeared, and he ackn wledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, 4ta—ry Pub is IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Daniel J. jO'Brien executed this instrument on SEP1�.mdE12 -1\ %J this IS day of Auga9t, 1990. IN THE PRESENCE OF: Ocu CY , STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, ss. 1.-�---- i DANIEL J. O'.�RIEN At aLiqtoCjkCn , this (,F� I day of 1990, DANIEL J. O'BRIEN, personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, �- ) -tiro �/62."'UJL, N taric -3- SPOKES, F®LEY & PETERSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 239 SOUTH UNION STREET P. 0. BOX 986 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0986 RICHARD A. SPOKES (802) 862-6451 JAMES D. FOLEY (802) 863-2857 RICHARD F. PETERSON, JR. T ELECO PIER (802) 863-2859 August 24, 1990 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Re: INS Dear Dick: Pursuant to the Planning Commission's Site Plan approval of June 26, 1990, I enclose a proposed Declaration of Easements and two copies of a revised Site Plan. The changes required by the Commission are highlighted on one of the revised Site Plans. I have delivered copies of the enclosed this afternoon to Steven Stitzel's office. RAS:miI Enclosure CC: Steven F. Stitzel, Esq. Mr. Daniel J. O'Brien Mr. Winston W. Hart Very,., ours, Richard A. Spokes DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS THIS DECLARATION made as of this day of August, 1990, by LEO O'BRIEN, JR. and DANIEL J. O'BRIEN of South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter referred to as "Declarants"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the Declarants are the fee simple owners of Lots 1 and 2 of the Business Park North Subdivision, so-called, as depicted on a plan entitled "Final Plan Business Park North, Civil Engineering Associates, Shelburne, VT" dated August 1978 and recorded in Volume 153 at Page 71 of the City of South Burlington Land Records ("Lots"); and WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission approved a boundary line revision between Lots 1 and 2 on June 26, 1990; and WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission on June 26, 1990 also approved a Site Plan for construction of an office building on the revised Lot No. 2; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the site plan approval of the Planning Commission, the two curb cuts located on Lot 2 shall be shared by both Lots 1 and 2; and WHEREAS, the two Lots will also share common parking lot aisles; and WHEREAS, the two curb cuts on Lot 2 and the common parking aisles on Lots 1 and 2 are depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan/Lighting Plan -United States Immigration and Naturalization Service -Lot 2 Business Park North, Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, VT" by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Incorporated, dated April 1990 and last revised August 23, 1990 (Plan); and SPOKES, FOLEY & PETERSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW BURLINGTON. VERMONT SPOKES, FOLEY & PETERSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW BURLINGTON. VERMONT WHEREAS, the Declarants wish to establish the necessary easements to implement the conditions of the Planning Commission's site plan approval. NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarants hereby declare that the Lots shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the following easements, which shall run with the Lots and be binding upon all persons having any right, title or interest in the Lots, their heirs, successors and assigns, and which shall inure to the benefit of the owner of each Lot. 1. Lot 1 is hereby subjected to an easement and right of way for the benefit of Lot 2 for ingress and egress between Lot 1 and Kimball Avenue over, upon and through those areas identified on the Plan as "Curb cuts for Lots 1 & 2" and "Access to Lot 1 over Lot 2." The easement and right of way herein established shall be used in common by Lots 1 and 2. The costs of all maintenance, repair and replacement of the easement areas shall be borne solely by the owner of Lot 2. 2. Lots 1 and 2 are hereby subjected to an easement and right of way for the common benefit of Lots 1 and 2 over, upon and through those areas depicted on the Plan as "Common parking aisles for Lots 1 & 2" to be used by each solely for parking aisle purposes. The owner of each Lot shall pay the costs of maintenance, repair and replacement of that portion of the common parking aisles located on its Lot. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Leo O'Brien, Jr. has executed this instrument this day of August, 1990. IN THE PRESENCE OF: -2- LEO O'BRIEN, JR. SPOKES, FOLEY & PETERSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW l URLINGTON, VERMONT STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, ss. At , on the day of _ 1990, LEO O'BRIEN, JR., personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Daniel J. O'Brien executed this instrument on this _ day of August, 1990. IN THE PRESENCE OF: DANIEL J. O'BRIEN STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, ss. At , this day of , 1990, DANIEL J. O'BRIEN, personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public -3- City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 August. 20, 1990 Mr. Dan O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency P.O. Boy: 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Boundary Line Adjustment and Office Building -- Kimball Avenue Dear Dan: Enclosed are the 6/26/90 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please meet the stipulations contained in the approval motion before applying for a building permit. Please call if you have any questions. i sere y, oe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp SPOKES , FOLEY & PETERSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 239 SOUTH UNION STREET P. O. BOX 986 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0986 RICHARD A. SPOKES JAMES D.FOLEY RICHARD F. PETERSON, JR. August 6, 1990 Craig R. DiGiammarino Assistant District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: Minor Application No. 4CO310-7 I.N.S. Partnership Dear Craig: (802) 862-6451 (802) 863-2857 TELECOPIER 1802) 863-2859 I represent the South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership, and am responding to the City of Burlington's request for a hearing. We feel the City's request should be denied for the following reasons: 1. The City's hearing request was untimely. Although dated July 31, 1990, it was not received by the Commision until August 1 or August 2. The published public notice required all hearing requests to be received by the Commission on or before July 31, 1990. 2. As the enclosed tax map indicates, the City of Burlington is not an adjoining landowner. The I.N.S. application pertains to Lots 1 and 2 of the Business Park North Subdivision. Both lots are presently owned by Daniel and Leo O'Brien. The O'Briens also own Lots 3, 4, and S. There are, however, several intervening landowners between the subject property (Lots 1 and 2) and the property owned by the City of Burlington (Burlington International Airport). 3. The City of Burlington did not participate as an adjoining landowner or a 14B party in the original Business Park North application, nor did it seek party status, or participate, in the subsequent six amendment applications. The prior amendment applications all involve lots closer to the Burlington International Airport than Lots 1 and 2. Craig R. DiGiammarino - 2 - August 6, 1990 4. The City's request is deficient in that it fails to state with specificity why a hearing is required, nor does it suggest what evidence, if any, it intends to present. For the above -stated reasons, we encourage the Commission to deny the City's hearing request, and proceed with the issuance of the proposed permit. Would you please note my appearance for the applicants, and include me on the distribution list. Thank you. Very truly yours, Richard A. Spokes RAS/gmt cc: Parties Listed on Attached Certificate of Service CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Richard A. Spokes, attorney for the South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership, sent a copy of the foregoing letter to Craig DiGiammarino regarding Application No. 4CO310-7 by U.S. Mail, postage paid, on this 6th day of August, 1990, to the following: Paul Farrar, Chairman So. Burlington City Council 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Joe Weith, City Planner City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Arthur Hogan, Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission P. 0. Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05452 Derric Saville Planning Division Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street - 2 Center Waterbury, VT 05676 Gretchen Bailey Assistant City Attorney City of Burlington Room 11, City Hall Burlington, VT 05401 Richard A. Spokes City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 Mr. Daniel O'Brien South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership 1855 Williston Road P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont. 05403 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 July 26,1990 Re: I.N.S. Building and Boundary Line Adjustment Dear Dan: Enclosed are the 6/5/90 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Joe Weit.h, City Planner 1 Encl cc: Chip Hart JW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 5 JUNE 1990 page 4 Mr. O'Brien said the stipulation about traffic impact was contrary to the history of the business park. He said they agreed to con- tribute their share to the Kimball Avenue/Kennedy Drive inter- section, but the new stipulation says they will pick up some un- determined cost for improvements at other intersections. Mr. Burgess said the Commission has more control over intersections at subdivision hearings. Mr. O'Brien insisted this is not a sub- division but is a boundary line adjustment. He said they discussed intersections 12 years ago. They are, he added, willing to participate in any fair plan. Mr. Austin said the Commission ought to determine if they are con- tractually obligated because of the previous stipulations and recommended getting an opinion from the City Attorney. Ms. Peacock and Mr. Craig agreed to withdraw their motion. Mr. Craig then moved to continue the hearing until clarification is received from the City Attorney. Mr. Belter seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5) Discussion with I.N.S. Partnership on contruction of a 66,000 sq. ft. building for office use on lot #2 of the Business Park North subdivision on Kimball Avenue Members agreed to hear an informal discussion since the subdivision request has been continued. Mr. O'Brien asked that the items be on the 26 June agenda since they are under time constraints. Members agreed. Mr. O'Brien said the building will be brick. It will house the offices of INS. They are dealing with General Services out of Boston for the project. There would be 2 curb cuts to serve the lot and these curb cuts would also serve lot #1. Ms. Peacock said she had a problem with 2 curb cuts. Mr. Weith noted that in the rest of the business park the lots have more than one curb cut. He had no problem with 2. Mr. O'Brien said they will build a sidewalk the lEngth of the property of lots 1 and 2. Mr. Craig noted that because of a pre- vious stipulation, they will have to connect the sidewalk to 30 Kimball Avenue. Mr. O'Brien said they would build an equivalent amount of sidewalk further down to connect with #30. Mr. Craig said they have to build the sidewalk on the lot containing the parking lot and that he would agree to going that far. PLANNING COMMISSION 5 JUNE 1990 page 5 Mr. O'Brien said total lot coverage would be 44% with building coverage at 80. They will provide more parking than required. 264 spaces are required and they propose 286. The building will have 3 floors. Landscaping will be brought up to standard. Screening is a problem as they can't berm on the side. It was suggested that screening be accomplished with plantings. They will also ask for credit for the wooded area on the lot. The building will be 45 ft. high and there will be additional setback to compensate for the height. Mr. O'Brien said they have agreed to take out the curb cuts from the original road and put in regular curbs across the curb cut areas. The water system will be looped to meet the Fire Chief's request. There will be 3 hydrants. The building will be sprinklered. INS anticipates 218 employees. They will use 56,000 sq. ft. of the building. The rest would be leased to other tenants. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Revised Final Plat application of South Burlington Realty Company to revise and construct the remaining 11 units (Phase V) of a 50 unit planned residential development known as Meadowbrook Condominiums, Jov Drive Mr. Craig stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Dicovitsky said the original plan did not have a loop road. It has been put in at the request of the Fire Chief. One unit has been moved to leave more space between the older and the new buildings. Carports have been relocated. Regarding drainage, there is a commitment that no new construction adversely affect what is already on the site. Older drainage problems have existed since before 1980. There is a court directed award in this matter and all drainage probelms will be able to be taken care of the the condominium association. Mr. Llewellyn said they have agreed to bring a storm sewer with 2 drop inlets and a berm so all storm water will be directed away from the older development (Cluster B) where there is a problem. Mrs. Maher asked if the Commission can be concerned with an old drainage problem. Mr. Weith said they can but he didn't know what this developer could do about it. They don't have control CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OI' RECORD (name, address, phone #1 Al 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #)/ 4).PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: -- 5) LOT NUMBER (if appplicable)_. 75- / 6) PROPOSED USE(S) 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum /height and # floors, square feet per floor) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9).LOT COVERAGE: building X; landscaped areas % building, parking, outside storage X 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings = OUOo�i� , Landscaping S j Other Site Improvements (please ist with cost) S 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon ; 12-1p.m. ; 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. ; 5-6 p.m. ; 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: �— DATE SUBMISSION SIGNATURE F APPLICANT DATE OF PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (8 1/2 X 11 OR 8 1/2 X 14) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible). Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. (This requires separate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street * and lot #). North arrow. Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. -2- 6/26/90 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership for con- struction of a 66,000 square foot building for office use as depicted on a 6 page set of plans, page one entitled, "Site Plan/Lighting Plan, United States Immigration and Naturalization Service," prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., and dated April 1990, last revised June 21, 1990, with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $43,500, 3-year landscaping bond prior to permit. The Planning Commission grants a $3,500 credit for existing vegetation within the ravines surrounding the site. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to permit to show proposed striping to clearly direct westbound traffic on Kimball Avenue away from the eastbound left turn lane. 3. The two proposed curb cuts on lot 2 shall be shared by both lots 1 and 2. Appropriate legal documents which allow lot 1 access over lot 2 shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to permit. The legal document shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to recording. 4. Appropriate legal documents which allow parking aisles for lot 2 to be located on lot 1 shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to permit. The legal documents shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to recording. 5. A sewer allocation of 4030 gpd is granted based on an esti- mate of 268 employees. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. 6. The Planning Commission approves a maximum building height. of 45 feet. It is the Commission's opinion that the additional height will relate aesthetically to other existing and proposed structures, will not detract from scenic views, and will allow retention of additional green space. The applicant shall submit building elevations which show preconstruction grade, post - construction grade, and building height, including rooftop appa- ratus, at time of permit application. 7. The applicant shall contribute prior to permit $15,383 to the Williston Road Area 2 Intersection Improvement Fund. This fund includes improvements to the Kennedy Drive/Kimball Avenue and Kennedy Drive/Williston Road intersections. 8. Proposed lighting shall be downcast luminaire. 9. Sidewalk construction and associated fees shall be in accord- ance with the attached sidewalk agreement dated 6/25/90 and signed by I.N.S. Partnership, Osgood -Hart Properties, and O'Brien Brothers. 10. A building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Planning File Data for Computer Input 1. Original Property Owner �`�. •.. -s "L . Developer's Name 3. Name of Development- 4 . Address of Development or Project 5. Type of Project _Q Minor Subdivision (MI) Major Subdivision (MS) Site Plan (SP) 6. Zoning District 1 7. Zoning District Z K. Zoning Board Approval date if Required 9. Date of Planning Commission Hearings/Meetings Site Plan Date G��fyo or Sketch Plan Date 3 10. Preliminary Plat date ll. Final Plat Date IZ. Revised Final Plat Date 1 (if applicable) 13. Revised Final Plat Date 2 if applicable) 11. Acreage of 'rotal Project G 7 1: Use of Land 1 d 1 C . list! of' band L ' 'T . Usf— r) f Land 3 l �• . t <) I• Land 4 1'a . Number of Lots 0 Numhr!r of Single Fami I}- Unity; I N,I1tUheT. of Mk.1 I t i- f,im i I v Un i t s 'l ri�.t t iic t iOIt Cost nt• liui I d i �oar, ® MORWO s . TI 23. Size of Building (Square footage) _ A`10 0 v 24. Streets City Street CS Private Street PS 25. Date of Acceptance of streets by City _ 26. Bond -Landscaping 3. (�- o6 27. Bond -Streets _ 28. Bond -Sewer 29. Bond -Water 30. Bond -Other _ 31. Date Mylar Due (90 days after approval) 32. • 33. 34. 34. 36. 37. 38. Date Recorded - Expiration date of Approval _ Date of First Building Permit Tax Map Number 2'_ Z Map File Location 1 Map File Location 2 Map File Location 3 Other fees (Type and amount)or 14� O7,f s'Gtµ014.. /5,3P3 G�,'//�I/i. X;". Preparers Name: Date: Posted in Computer (Name, Date): Memorandum - Planning June 26, 1990 agenda items June 11, 1990 Page L 3) I.N.S. BUILDING. LOT 2. KIMBALL AVENUE Outstanding issues for this application include: 1) traffic improvement contributions, 2) landscaping along the Kimball Avenue frontage , and 3) sidewalks. Traffic: As explained in my memo to the Commission dated 6/15/90, staff recommends a contribution of $15,383 toward traf- fic improvements. This is based on a revised impact fee formula for this area of the City. The City will install a new traffic light at Kimball Avenue/Kennedy Drive next summer prior to the occupancy of the I.N.S. Building. The applicant has agreed to this contribution. Landscaping: A revised landscaping plan has been submitted showing more landscaping along the Kimball Avenue frontage. The plan shows a mixture of hardwood trees (Locust), pine clumps and a variety of evergreen and deciduous bushes. I feel the plan looks good and will nicely break up views of the large parking lot from Kimball Avenue. The landscaping requirement is $43,500. The plan is valued at approximately $40,000. The applicant is requesting a $3,500 credit for the existing vegetation along the ravines surrounding the building site. I see no problem with this. Sidewalks: I met with Sonny Audette to discuss how best to handle the sidewalk issue, whether through a contribution or by requiring the applicant to construct the walk. It is recommended by staff that the applicant contribute toward the 920 feet of frontage along both lots 1 and 2 (920 x $15 = $13,800). This will satisfy the sidewalk contributions for lots 1 and 2. Os- good- Hart will contribute toward the 238 feet of frontage for lot 11 (238x $15 = $3,570) which they owe as part of an earlier approval for a parking lot. This will satisfy lot eleven's contribution requirements. The City Street Department will construct the sidewalk from where it currently ends (lot 5), over lots 11, 3, and 4 to the entrance of this project. This will be done next summer after July 1. Lots 3 and 4 will be assessed the $15 per foot sidewalk fee when developments are proposed. This contribution will then be used to construct sidewalks along lots 1 and 2 or further down Kimball Avenue. 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 June 22, 1990 Mr. Daniel O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: INS Building and Boundary Line Adjustment, Lots 1 and 2 Dear Dan: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 26, 1990 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. i cer�ely, oe Weith, City Planner Encls cc: Mr. Chip Hart JW/mcp JIo &o i � 5 4Gtp1)5;;4 IP 4 .. �---� _ � �s M�� /►�IALvS \?�i�'G�E� �g,Pir ���' Gls#3�q°C� Z� 3" 3 �o� ZoG tif5 NrA� �/ S,o�Gi.�re.✓ «��9°� 3,j/ ,. � yam► g� /00 l PiG G-'Gg L✓y�/ �o,Pr/L� g,d� 8 r P►J I New C6 __, Rim 325 / Inv 320 KAI s�i✓�OL p , / � GOM�'ID�l �t/fbr1� S1ZE __ ��� y o ref P16 �� �Wrr� �� fie' N q-0 the _ Wood/onds_ iM '0YO M aA vewwmiy pF _.ki IJV'VlPa5 HVI_; CAQ 6Q?AV3 el'�tM Soee4 AD '9M WOW son /Y + Lot / (revised) __V,. tZ AK 1 / r 32g ` New proposed cw INS SIDEWALK --------------------- ANALYSIS June 14, 1990 DISTANCES UNITS ...,....,,-.,......-.. - OLD NEW --.. --- Sidewalk/foot $2.50 Lot #1 644 290 Labor&mach/yard $15.00 Lot #2 276 630 Fill/yard $8.00 Total. 920 920 Seed&mulch/foot $0.05 NW Cor #2 to Entrance 200 A. OPTION Build sidewalk from #11 to entrance #2. Lot Feet Costs: 4 375 Sidewalk 11,688 3 360 Site preparation: 2 200 Fill(6x935/27) 1,662 Total 935 Labor(6x935/27) 3,117 Seed&mulch(6x935) 281 Sub -total site prep 5,059 Sub-toti'al walk & prep- 16,747 Culvert area 5,000 Total 21,747 B. OPTION Build sidewalk front of #Is 1 & 2. Lot Feet Costs: 2 630 Sidewalk 11,500 1 290 Preparation: Total 920 @ 1/3 of I. ,above 1,686 Sub -total walk & prep 13,186 Culvert area 5,000 Total 18,186 C. OPTION Contribute to sidewalk fund. Lot Feet Cost: 2 630 Sidewalk @ $15/foot 13800 1 290 Total 920 Note: sidewalk for Lot # 1 @ $2.50 per foot is worth $3,625. y� v s M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: I.N.S. Proposal, Kimball avenue Date: June 15, 1990 At the 6/5/90 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission in- structed staff to meet with the applicant to reach an agreement on a fair contribution toward needed traffic improvements. Prior to the meeting I revised the Williston Road Area 2 Improvement Fund which is explained in the attached memo to Chuck Hafter. Based on the revised formula, the I.N.S. proposal would be re- quired to contribute $15,385 toward improvements to the Kennedy/Kimball and Kennedy/Williston intersections. The current formula requires a contribution of only $1,384. The applicant for the I.N.S. building has agreed to contribute the $15,385. The City will budget enough money next year (possi- bly this year) to cover the remaining cost of a traffic signal at Kennedy Drive/Kimball Avenue. The signal will be installed next year prior to the opening of the I.N.S. building. Future contri- butions by other developments will in effect be used to reimburse the City as well as fund other improvements identified in the Williston Road Area 2 Improvement Fund. I feel this contribution is fair and urge the Commission to approve it. Chuck Hafter has informed me that several City Council members expressed pleasure with the agreement. I recommend the Planning Commission immediately adopt this re- vised policy. The City Council must adopt an official ordinance for all the City's impact fees (i.e., traffic, recreation and sewer) in order to comply with State enabling legislation. Due to the Commission's current work load for the Comprehensive Plan and Southeast Quadrant Zoning, I do not think we can get to updating the fees until early fall. Until such time as the Coun- cil adopts an official ordinance, the Commission should continue to impose contributions based on the current and revised impact fee policies. cc: Chuck Hafter 10 1 a ru UI 2.3 Z I Diliu To: Chuck Hafter, City Manager From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: Williston Road Improvement Fund Date: June 12, 1990 There has been considerable concern expressed regarding the fee computation formula for the Williston Road Area 2 Improvement Fund (Attachment A). Many feel the fee being paid by developers is too low and does not appropriately represent a fair share contribution towards needed improvments. The primary problem with the formula is that the projected number of future develop- ment related trip ends in the corridor represents full build -out in an undefined number of years. The formula should instead project future growth in trip ends over a planning period of 10 years, a period in which necessary improvements can be more feasibly identified and implemented. Land use information for the year 2000 has been developed for the T-Model 2 traffic program. Applying appropriate I.T.E trip generation rates to the projected development growth in the Williston Road Impact Area 2 district, results in an estimate of 1,183 new peak hour trips in the next 10 years. This 1,183 future trip end figure should be substituted for the 10,114 trip ends currently contained in the existing formula. In addition to the future trip end revision, the identified improvements and costs contained in the existing impact fee formula should be updated to include several new improvments which were identified in the INS traffic study (Attachment B). The estimated cost of these new improvements are approximately $30,000. In consideration of the recommendations described above, I recommend the Williston Road Area 2 Improvement Fund formula be revised as follows: Proposed # pk. hr. trip ends from development / 1,183 = x $130,000 = FEE Inputting the estimated 140 peak hour trips ends -to be generated by the I.N.S. building would result in a fee of $15,385. The existing formula computes a fee of only $1,384. 1 Williston Road Traffic Impact Policy For the purposes of this policy, the Williston Road corridor is divided into 2 segments. Segment 1 includes the Gaynes, Sheraton and Holiday Inn area shown on tax maps #6, #7, #15, #16 and the heavily developed commercial area and the lesser developed - area to the east shown on tax maps 9, 12, 17, and 18. Segment 2 includes the Kennedy Drive/Airport Drive intersection east to the City limits shown on tax maps 14, 19, 20, 21, 29, and 32. The impact fee is based on: 1) the undeveloped land in each segment; 2) an estimate of the development potential of the undeveloped acreage; 3) an estimate of the peak hour trip ends for the undeveloped acreage; and 4) the required traffic improvements and costs. Each development proposal in the impact area will contribute to the total trips projected for the corridor. Those trips are a --share of the total trips estimated. That share shall be paid toward the total cost of Williston Road improvements. 2 The following improvements shall be made with the impact fees and have been determined to be necessary with the proposed development. IMPACT AREA 1 $2m x 10% = 200,000 1) Widen Williston Road to 5 lanes (Dorset to Hinesburg). $30,000 2) Set o'f traffic signals at intersection of Patchen Road and White rz"- -900 Street. 3) Crosswalks and pedestrian actuated signals. $230,000 TOTAL IMPACT AREA 2 30,000 4) Set of traffic signals at intersection of Victoria Drive - Williston Road to allow cars to exit out of Mayfair Park where movement is --- mainly to the west. 300,OOOx10% = $30,000 5) , Extra lanes at intersection of Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive and Williston.Road. $30,000 6) A set of traffic signals at Kimball Avenue and Kennedy Drive especially as Kimball Avenue, Shunpike Road and Williston develop. 10,000 7) Crosswalks and pedestrian actuated signals at Kennedy/Williston inter- section. 8) Widen Williston Road from Clinton Street to City line to 4 lanes (State). 9) Traffic signals at Shunpike - Williston Road intersection (State). $100,000 TOTAL 3 The following are estimates of undeveloped acreage, building growth and trip generation: Impact Area lA Commercial 1: 84.58 acres x 43560 = 3,684,304.8 x 30% coverage = 1,105,291.4 x 2.84 trip ends/1000 gfa = 3,139 Residential 4: 12 acres - 15% (1.8) = 10.2 x 4 x 1 trip end per unit = 41 Impact area 1B Commercial 1: 15.28 acres x 43560 = 665,596.8 x 30% coverage = 199,679.04 x 2.84/1000 = 567 Commercial 1: (Corporate Circle) 2380 trip ends x 25% to Williston Road = 595 Residential 4: 11.13 acres - 15% = 9.36 x 4 units/acre x 1 trip end/unit = 38 TOTAL TRIP ENDS = 4380 Impact Area 2 Commercial 1: 82.46 acres x 43560 = 3,591,957.6 x 30% coverage = 1,077,587.2 square feet x 2.84/1000 = 3060 Commercial 2: 24.05 acres x 43560 = 1,047,618 x 30% coverage = 314,285.4 square feet x 2.84 / 1000 = 893 Industrial -Commercial: 164.3 acres x 43560 = 7,156,908 x 30% coverage = 2,147,072.4 square feet x 2.84,/ 1000 - 6098 Total Commercial: 3,538,945 square feet x 2.84 trips/1000 square feet = 10,051 trip ends Residential 4: 18.39 x 4 units/acre = 73.56 - 15% = 63 x 1 trip end/unit = 63 trip ends TOTAL = 10,114 trip ends 4 Impact Area 1A plus impact Area 1B: 4380 trip ends Impact Area 2 = 10,114 trip c js The Planning Commission recognizes that these estimates may be changed as properties are developed and modifications to the list of improvements may be required. The Commission reserves the right to adjust this policy as required. FORMULA: IMPACT AREA 1 Proposed * of tripends/4380 = % x 230,000 = fee Example: Pomerleau 209 tripends/4380 = 4.77% x 230,000 = $11,000. FORMULA: IMPACT AREA 2 Proposed # trip ends / 10,114 = % x $100,000 = $ fee. 4� r ArAomrevr complgr-/sotj OF' *J Z',41foo4G r FOKN(V LIa �MP� ✓EMS �i�T��/�1� /� _ ,t/ S 772Ar s7v ® Y 1, Tsza FF! 6I604A-t, a� V+�-rorz�a. -DrL\ JIS / V) i "I sTrafJ 'P-OA rp y. Tom. l SICrMA,L P kimr3,au Avo. / WNNcD- z)R✓VE 3. ►''1 f29ovt-"-c .tTs -r"o V-r--PM:TDLj 'PF-- / W I W-) Sro,J P.oa'D ' a� Ccw-vmtkT' EXCL vsiVE LEFT '7ZIVA) LANES Po' x Lr , w , -+- oJ A-Fv°R O A c+4G .5, b� h114w FVL�' AcruATSD Goarr-I-DLLgk Csu k) e-) G u , r)E 5 t U-tvs Fort- a! !2 PoYLT' (3-4 k ) el) G 1`zbsswAc.K S +- PE[ 5-r R, Ar.J Ac-T'tu Area s i (:;rN A t_ 4 _��D>=D �MP,zoyEMa&rrS NCr 1A) CLUZ)C-D �,y t. =1v6TX1LL PAveme&'-r /yARk-j&)Grs ^-r Kdn,(P34LL/ NNEv\- 7b 'QIZO V I DE F.X GL U s 1 VLW Le pr, TUIeW LA,,j b S '="p (Z /U + S , ppA.OA C �I�S Z/2EA5srCT,J rU APP90ACI A-r �d&WaOY /tIji"i.srooi IUD. To ALLc9w A Se can! A Le Fr 7vRN LEA" G 3 M4vDf Fy SIGruAu P4A4st tj& AT KEnJMb D j l t.4 rt--►s-mri RA . -Tv AL L&W 5PL IT TU - 5 �W4S r,v cr 4. LvN57-9VCT E:XCLUSIVIE RI F.rh'PT IvK-ti LANE 4T— �—eNvav%/ K//►l eALL AV4r- i J5-1 - A-,� /� i , j # Co/'�t���%SonJ . OF. �'�!i°,eov�r��7-s : ��V Ct✓v17�t� ,`v Z•y�'�4cr � 1 h7rVt�l vL/� �r- �MP�=o vEi�r /r ivTiFi�ll� /x/ Z� S T2A�t r s7v D Y, :UYA m6J1; Mew S" Gtv W D I IV �yTzH � LAB 1. TtZ�F�Ic- SIGTN�1, o� Vte-- miA-DR.\W,;/ w1"1s7-otJ �kOA-D SI crNAL 'P kIMB,oLL -AvE. / , ,vN�Dr v� �j©,voo. 3. K l Pfzo�� � JTs rr'o . V-r---ti'&Mr-)Lf Vie,.. / (N i W .4.S710n) P-ea'D 2) COIS7 CtxT ',i5-XC4ASYVE LEFT %viQA) LAAZ6 P"p,Q L-, W , -�- '-J A-FWR-Oac+{C,.:!:, I1 yf�G CO A K) 6) N w �u L� 4- f� Irva-rgP GonrT/�o Lt. ,e C J N k� 'jjD� (VO G-u , 5 cY Ns 1=a1� ,ail le f� rzr T k d� G t�asswALK s +— P�c� s-rirz,;a.N �c-Zv aka s � cti a L -��- N DEp �M P.eo v�1y BST s N l N G[.,u1�ED IAJ t. =N-s-rALL PAVEM.E&Yr. A44Rkltil6-5 t47' !/44113ALL/ �NN6D`r 7a 2 9t1f� PRO V I PE I )(cL u t 1 V!r L japr 'Tulenl LA v es I=b rt N+ C. ,4wPrZ04 c Ns.S 2, �EA5S/(ar�i /�% �PP,COAG�I �i7- titiror w t c,�sm.� %�J . 7b ,4LLa-,,/ WA A LeC.oMz LE Pr -(vRN LANff 3 M�D1 Fy 5'6r?JAL- PPA,t tj& At Ke. Ajm F-0 7 / t-+ r u-4 s-rorj Pb- Tb A[_.e..otj SP L 1T P 5 J"WA-S / A,I rA- N/A 4-. eo vs7-?z Uc.T` ex C. Lu 5 i VIE �j R1 &-t4T lZ-)K- j LANr= i4T iv�VED jr/ �'- i i Cor1���iso o� zr�i�,�r�vrrs �NC�vrr� ,w 7'.y104C7- Z,/S TRAFFre 15 - vY �wtFlzaJEM�� �iUGLut�f� . t. T9AVP-I s Crya L 3. -ro W a) Ga�vsrrcc rr :EXC'Lvs/VE /EFT 7"�/,�1�1 LANDS: pax 9- , w , -f- AJ a f:,voe ct 4r,g 6) N w �v w �►- A(-T-VAT I) . 4VAr rr-V L4lE,e ('.TN k e-) U-u jr_>e 516,tjs Fak�.Ajr-porzr (T14k) d� G t�aSswA�� s +- P� STR1 aN AK-'Lv AT'El S 14- M A L i nir�E DEp n t P�eo v�� Btirr s N �' l'N GL.uDED !ti) I. Tpi rA LL PAVEM.E&),r. A4APkjAJCTS t4'r )-"4K4P3ALL/ �JNEDt- '7a — 'p(z0 ► O E 1:X GL u s i vg C-EF`r Tu1eN (-a4 N Es R,4PP/io,4 C A.l &S 2, �EASSi(�ai �% /¢PPCDAG I .47r eNN,60 e / w /.LW 10.j Rb. Tb A LLO- ,1 A Se ca.v Z LE Pr TARN IAiu F 3 MvDJ Fy SlG,nuALPPAS1 N& AT �ZAJM b Dw ILL45- ri AL Lori SPLIT �C1" 5 P�F.4StNC- t� Go ^�5T72 u cT �JC G L U 5 ► V _ . /J . P I &*.tr . l v K-#j . LEANS �2 -t -7"-47 AAk 71, Williston Road Traffic Impact Policy For the purposes of this policy, the Williston Road corridor is divided into 2 segments. Segment 1 includes the Gaynes, Sheraton and Holiday Inn area shown on tax maps #6, #7, #15, #16 and the heavily developed commercial area and the lesser developed - area to the east shown on tax maps 9, 12, 17, and 18. Segment 2 includes the Kennedy Drive/Airport Drive intersection east to the City limits shown on tax maps 14, 19, 20, 21, 29, and 32. The impact fee is based on: 1) the undeveloped land in each segment; 2) an estimate of the development potential of the undeveloped acreage; 3) an estimate of the peak hour trip ends for the undeveloped acreage; and 4) the required traffic improvements and costs. Each development proposal in the impact area will contribute to the total trips projected for the corridor. Those trips are a --share of the total trips estimated. That share shall be paid toward the total cost of Williston Road improvements. 2 The following improvements shall be made with the impact fees and have been determined to be necessary with the proposed development. IMPACT AREA 1 $2m x 10% = 200,000 1) Widen Williston Road to 5 lanes (Dorset to Hinesburg). $30,000 2) Set of traffic signals at intersection of Patchen Road and White rn*- -000 Street. 3) Crosswalks and pedestrian actuated signals. $230,000 TOTAL IMPACT AREA 2 30,000 4) Set of traffic signals at intersection of Victoria Drive - Williston Road to allow cars to exit out of Mayfair Park where movement is --- mainly to the west. 300,OOOx10% _ $30,000 5) ; Extra lanes at intersection of Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive and Williston.Road. $30,000 6) A set of traffic signals at Kimball Avenue and Kennedy Drive` especially as Kimball Avenue, Shunpike Road and Williston develop. 10,000 7) Crosswalks and pedestrian actuated signals at Kennedy/Williston inter- section. 8) Widen Williston Road from Clinton Street to City line to 4 lanes (State). 9) Traffic signals at Shunpike - Williston Road intersection (State). $100,000 TOTAL 3 The following are estimates of undeveloped acreage, building growth and trip generation: Impact Area 1A Commercial 1: Residential 4: Impact area 1B Commercial 1: 84.58 acres x 43560 = 3,684,304.8 x 30% coverage = 1,105,291.4 x 2.84 trip ends/1000 gfa = 3,139 12 acres - 15% (1.8) = 10.2 x 4 x 1 trip end per unit = 41 15.28 acres x 43560 = 665,596.8 x 30% coverage = 199,679.04 x 2.84/1000 = 567 Commercial 1: (Corporate Circle) 2380 trip ends x 25% to Williston Road = 595 Residential 4: 11.13 acres - 15% = 9.36 x 4 units/acre x 1 trip end/unit = 38 TOTAL TRIP ENDS = 4380 Impact Area 2 Commercial 1: 82.46 acres x 43560 = 3,591,957.6 x 30% coverage = 1,077,587.2 square feet x 2.84/1000 = 3060 Commercial 2: 24.05 acres x 43560 = 1,047,618 x 30% coverage = 314,285.4 square feet x 2.84 / 1000 = 893 Industrial -Commercial: 164.3 acres x 43560 = 7,156,908 x 30% coverage = 2,147,072.4 square feet x 2.84 /1000 - 6098 Total Commercial: 3,538,945 square feet x 2.84 trips/1000 square feet = 10,051 trip ends Residential 4: 18.39 x 4 units/acre = 73.56 - 15% = 63 x 1 trip end/unit = 63 trip ends TOTAL = 10,114 trip ends 4 Impact Area 1A plus impact Area 1B: 4380 trip ends Impact Area 2 = 10,114 trip ends The Planning Commission recognizes that these estimates may be changed as properties are developed and modifications to the list of improvements may be required. The Commission reserves the right to adjust this policy as required. FORMULA: IMPACT AREA 1 Proposed # of tripends/4380 = % x 230,000 = fee Example: Pomerleau 209 tripends/4380 = 4.77% x 230,000 = $11,000. FORMULA: IMPACT AREA 2 Proposed # trip ends / 10,114 = % x $100,000 = $ fee. 5 Williston Road Traffic Impact Policy For the purposes of this policy, the Williston Road corridor is divided into 2 segments. Segment 1 includes the Gaynes, Sheraton and Holiday Inn area shown on tax maps #6, #7, #15, #16 and the heavily developed commercial area and the lesser developed - area to the east shown on tax maps 9, 12, 17, and 18. Segment 2 includes the Kennedy Drive/Airport Drive intersection east to the City limits shown on tax maps 14, 19, 20, 21, 29, and 32. The impact fee is based on: 1) the undeveloped land in each segment; 2) an estimate of the development potential of the undeveloped acreage; 3) an estimate of the peak hour trip ends for the undeveloped acreage; and 4) the required traffic improvements and costs. Each development proposal in the impact area will contribute to the total trips projected for the corridor. Those trips are a --share of the total trips estimated. That share shall be paid toward the total cost of Williston Road improvements. 2 The following improvements shall be made with the impact fees and have been determined to be necessary with the proposed development. IMPACT AREA 1 $2m x 10% = 200,000 1) Widen Williston Road to 5 lanes (Dorset to Hinesburg). $30,000 2) Set o'f traffic signals at intersection of Patchen Road and White $239To00 Street. 3) Crosswalks and pedestrian actuated signals. $230,000 TOTAL IMPACT AREA 2 30,000 4) Set of traffic signals at intersection of Victoria Drive - Williston Road to allow cars to exit out of Mayfair Park where movement is -- mainly to the west. 300,000x10% _ $30,000 5) , Extra lanes at intersection of Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive and Williston.Road. $30,000 6) A set of traffic signals at Kimball Avenue and Kennedy Drive` especially as Kimball Avenue, Shunpike Road and Williston develop. 10,000 7) Crosswalks and pedestrian actuated signals at Kennedy/Williston inter- section. 8) Widen Williston Road from Clinton Street to City line to 4 lanes (State). 9) Traffic signals at Shunpike - Williston Road intersection (State). $100,000 TOTAL 3 The following are estimates of undeveloped acreage, building growth and trip generation: Impact Area 1A Commercial 1: Residential 4: Impact area 1B Commercial 1: 84.58 acres x 43560 = 3,684,304.8 x 30% coverage = 1,105,291.4 x 2.84 trip ends/1000 gfa = 3,139 12 acres - 15% (1.8) = 10.2 x 4 x 1 trip end per unit = 41 15.28 acres x 43560 = 665,596.8 x 30% coverage = 199,679.04 x 2.84/1000 = 567 Commercial 1: (Corporate Circle) 2380 trip ends x 25% to Williston Road = 595 Residential 4: 11.13 acres - 15% = 9.36 x 4 units/acre x 1 trip end/unit = 38 TOTAL TRIP ENDS = 4380 Impact Area 2 Commercial 1: 82.46 acres x 43560 = 3,591,957.6 x 30% coverage = 1,077,587.2 square feet x 2.84/1000 = 3060 Commercial 2: 24.05 acres x 43560 = 1,047,618 x 30% coverage = 314,285.4 square feet x 2.84 / 1000 = 893 Industrial -Commercial: 164.3 acres x 43560 = 7,156,908 x 30% coverage = 2,147,072.4 square feet x 2.84 X1000 - 6098 Total Commercial: 3,538,945 square feet x 2.84 trips/1000 square feet = 10,051 trip ends Residential 4: 18.39 x 4-units/acre = 73.56 - 15% = 63 x 1 trip end/unit = 63 trip ends TOTAL = 10,114 trip ends 4 -Impact Area 1A plus impact Area 1B: 4380 trip ends Impact Area 2 = 10,114 trip ends The Planning Commission recognizes that these estimates may be changed as properties are developed and modifications to the list of improvements may be required. The Commission reserves the right to adjust this policy as required. FORMULA: IMPACT AREA 1 Proposed # of tripends/4380 = % x 230,000 = fee Example: Pomerleau 209 tripends/4380 = 4.77% x 230,000 = $11,000. FORMULA: IMPACT AREA 2 Proposed # trip ends / 10,114 = % x $100,000 = $ fee. 9 It, PULE,-ING GOY-:ISSION 5. 1AY 23, 1978 9" in the three test pits they had dug. This addition would complete the development. Mr. Krona asked how far above the river this was and was told it was 30-40'. He asked if there would be any problem providing a public access to the river and '.sir. McKenzie said that he did not s ee a problem but that it was a pretty steep drop to the river. He said a present drainage right of way could be enlarged. One of the owners of a house in Country Club Estates said that his deed did not show a right of way where Mr. McKenzie was planning to put the road. Mr. Page said he would check into the question. The Commission felt this should be settled outside the hearing and that when it was decided, they could come back with a formal application. Mr. McKenzie said they would start developing contour lines. Mr. Ewing asked if these were single family homes and was told they were. Public hearing on final plat application of Mr. Gardner ilopwood for a 2 lot subdivision, 1350 Spear Street, Attorney Robert Perry Mr. Perry said they were going to sell a 3 acre lot. Mr. Dona asked about the access and was told it was 60' wide. 'Mr. Page said that if the backland was sold, the city would require perc tests. Mr. Poger moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application_ 2f Gardner Hopwood for a 2 lot subdivision, as depicted on the plan of record, subject to the following stipulations: 1. _The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days and shall show the lot to be conveyed surveyed in its entirety, and the "backland" with the best available information. 2. Perc tests shall be required prior to the issuance of any building____ permits for parcel 2 unless city sewer is available. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Public hearing on final plat application of Mr. Dan O'Brien for a 10 lot commercial subdivision, Business Park North, Messrs. _C'Britn_and Schmucker Mr. O'Brien said he would like to discuss the phasing of the project, It will be developed over 4 years, with 3 paroles being sold in 1978. 3 in 1979► 2 in 1980, and 2 in 1981. He did not like tying development to a certain level of service in the intersection because they could not control that and neither could the city. Mr. Poger said the Commission was empowered to deal with traffic for the health, welfare, and safety of the community and that no matter where the traffic came from, they had to deal with the problems it created. He felt it was their duty to provide the best level of service they could. Mr. Schmucker said that with Digital and Business Park North operating at full capacity, the developers have proven that the intersection will _anoperate at aacceptable level. he said they were extending site plan review to a level of service outside the parcel and he felt they could not impose standards which the developer could not control. Mr. Poger said he was afraid of what would happen if a catastrophe occurred. He had no objection to tying traffic and phasing together. He said that he would like a tie-in so that if a catastrophe hapyened the Commission could say there was a real and unexpected danger here and do something about it. Mr. Nona asked if the Co�:.=ission had ever required a four year phasing and was told they had not. fie felt this development's impact on traffic would be less than some and that the phasing period was longer. Yr.'Ioger said that the trouble on the Red Coach Grill G'2 PLANNING GQIIaISSION YAY 23, 1978 had not been that they would make such an impact, since many of the things already there had a more serious impact, but that what was there was so bad that any addition would have caused serious problems to the health, safety, and welfare of the community. He did not think this would, but wanted to protect the city. Mr.S--hmtx*er. replied that he could understand it if they were going to have a major traffic impact, but he said they would only add two lots per year and he said the other alternative was to sell as many lots as they can now. He felt this would not be good for the city and said that they were trying to deal with the problem as best they could, too, by phasing this way. Mr. Mona found the four year phasing acceptable. Rr. Levesque said that when Digital went in, they had not been required to put in sidewalks, and he asked why these people were being required to put them in when they had been left out by the city. Mr. Mona said each development had to bear its part and i-.r. Poger added that Digital had been off the lot and could not be expected to put in sidewalks. YIr. Poger said that opposing left turns onto Williston Road from Kennedy Drive and Airport Drive posed a problem and he suggested a change in the intersection design to make it work better. Mr. Mona asked if this development would have much impact on the Williston Road - Dorset Street intersection and the Commission agreed it would have very little. Mir. Houghton said that it looked like Digital's shift times would not be at peak road hours. Mr. Poger felt it would be better to line access to lots 9 and 10 up with the National Guard road. Mr. Page said that would be hard to do and added that the National Guard road might be shifted. 1r. Houghton said that intersection probably would not be signallized or carry heavy traffic, and he said that because of the rise in the road to the east, the thing to do would be to give someone coming out of those lots as much sight -distance as possible. He said the offset in the two roads was not serious enough to not allow signallization of that intersection. He also said that the National Guard Drive could be narrowed. Mr. Poger moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final -plat lication of Daniel O'Brien for Business Park North, as depicted on a-_pjsn net of _4 pages 275_ drawn by Civil Engineering -Associates, Inc., dated January 1978, with revisions. aubject to the following stipulations:_ 1) The conditions numbered 1-18, as included in a memo of 3/24/78 from O'Brien to South Burlington Planning Commission shall appjyl with the followin9 exceptions or clarifications: #1 "easement" to be "offer of irrevocable dedication". #2 slope rights to be shown accordingly on the final plat to b e recorded. -- -- - - to be conveyed by offer of irrevocable dedication. #7 the easement shall be continuous._along the back lines of lots 5__and 6� and the Sideline of lot_7,_ between the__ two segments oP._Potaah Brook. rb access to lot 7 shall be shown on the finalplat to be recorded. #9 the municipal water line shall be installed. #10 delete. PLANNING COMI-iISSION 7. `!AY 23, 1978 #11 cost sharing for intersection improvements shall also include \ geometric, signing, or other mneases involved in upgrading�he __ inter_ " section, #12 the future sewer easement shall be shown on the final plat and be secured by an offer of irrevocable dedication. #13, 142 17 not applicable 2) A final utility (sewer, water, phone, power) review shall be performed by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any_building_ permits. 3) All bonds and necessary legal agreements (including_easements for shared use of curb cuts shall be posted or executed prior to the _issuance_ of any building permits. 4) Storm drainage and cut and fill review shall be conducted at site plan review. 5) The following required improvements are waived: outdoor lighting, street signs, and_ landscaping_ 6) The subdivision shall be built out in accord with the four year_ phasing plan outlined in the memo of 4 13 78 from O'firien to_ Sou_t_h_ Burlington Planning Commission. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ewing, and it passed unanimously. Public hearing on final plat application of the Glenwood Corporation, Messrs. Lisman and Brown Mr. Lisman said that they had received preliminary approval on April 25 and that since then Mr. Szymanski has met with members of the public to review their concerns. Mr. Terry Boyle said that they had included a pedestrian easement, shown 2 additional fire hydrants, and noted that the -" buildings would have 30' separations. The project name will be Stonehedge. Mr. Page went through a May 19, 1978 and a Nay 23, 1978 memo from the City Engineer to the Commission regarding stipulations for approval of this project. He said that a primary difference between the two is that the residents of Laurel Hill would like improvements to water and sewer lines to be made before any of the units are built and occupied. He said that parking in cluster C was tight and suggested an easement from Glenwood to solve the problem. Mr. Poger said that Mr. Szymanski had recommended the main loop road be a city street - 30' paved width with curbs. 1•ir. Mona said that since most private roads end up as city streets, it did not seem unreasonable to require them to be built to city standards. Air. Levesque felt curbs were not always necessary and said the city standards were not up-to-date. Mr. Gucciardi, a resident of Laurel Hill, said that the residents there had talked to Y,r. Szymanski 2 weeks ago and again yesterday. They recommend the following before building permits are issued: 1) that final as-builts be developed for cluster C, 2) that as a result of the final as-builts, water, sewer, and drainage will have to be upgraded, 3) that overflow parking be provided, and 4) the residents challenge the validity of the transference of permits (Act 250, water use, etc.) from Potter, the . 11mpillil TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: O'BRIEN BROTHERS AND BRUCE HOUGHTON, ENGINEER RE: BUSINESS PARK NORTH SUBDIVISION APPLICATION, NORTHERLY SIDE INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD, EASTERLY SIDE KENNEDY DRIVE, SOUTHERLY SIDE WILLISTON ROAD DATE: MARCH 24, 1978 AGREED STATEMEIT OF FACTS Ow 1. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE BY APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS TO CONVEY TO THE CITY AN EASEMENT FOR THE WIDENING OF WILLISTON ROAD WITH RESPECT TO LANDS FRONTING WILLISTON ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE BUSINESS PARK NORTH DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED, TO A DEPTH OF 12 FEET. o!L 2. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE TO CONVEY TO THE CITY BY APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS SLOPE RIGHTS ALONG LOT 7 AND LOT 8 ON THE EASTERLY -,'SIDE OF KENNEDY DRIVE. THIS STATEMENT IS MADE SUBJECT TO AN UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN O'BRIEN BROTHERS AND THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON AS TO WHAT SLOPE RIGHTS IN FACT ARE REQUIRED. ��. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE TO DEDICATE OR TO CONVEY TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON A TRIANGULAR PORTION OF LAND TAKEN FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 7 BY APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS FOR SUBSEQUENT USE BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN IMPROVING THE INTERSECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD AND KENNEDY DRIVE, 0,'-' 4. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE THAT THE CURB CUTS SHOWN ON INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD ON THE SUBDIVISION PLANS SUBMITTED ARE PLACED IN A LOCATION WHERE THEY WILL COINCIDE WITH CURB CUTS ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD AT SUCH TIME AS THAT AREA IS DEVELOPED, THIS IS SUBJECT TO THE UNDERSTANDING THAT AT SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR EACH OF THE BUSINESS PARK NORTH LOTS, FROM THE POINT -OF -VIEW OF THE LOT OWNER AS WELL AS THE CITY, IT MAY BE DESIRABLE TO ADJUST THE CURB CUTS WITHIN THE BUSINESS PARK NORTH PROPERTY TO DEAL INTELLIGENTLY WITH ANY ISSUES THEN RAISED, OK--5. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE THAT LOTS Q AND IO ARE RE- STRICTED TO ACCESS THROUGH THE PRIVATE RIGHT OF WAY LYING TO THE WEST OF LOT 10. OK-6, O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE IN CONCEPT TO ACCESS CONNECTORS BETWEEN BUSINESS PARK NORTH ABUTTING PROPERTIES WHERE SUCH CONNECTORS ARE DESIRABLE, PRACTICABLE, AND FEASIBLE. HOWEVER, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH A CONNECTOR IS APPLICABLE TO EACH PARTICULAR LOT WILL DEPEND UPON THE INTENDED USE FOR THAT LOT AND THE NEEDS OF THAT LOT OWNER AND THIS ISSUE SHOULD BE HANDLED AT SITE PLAN REVIEW WHEN THE SPECIFICS OF EACH OWNER S USE OF THE PROPERTY ARE THEN KNOWN. Gk %. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE TO CONVEY TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON A PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT ALONG POTASH BROOK. plc.8. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE TO RESTRICT INGRESS AND EGRESS TO LOT % AT THE CORNER OF INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD AND KENNEDY DRIVE TO THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON A PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AS DEVELOPED BY MR. BRUCE HOUGHTON, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, PAULSEN ASSOCIATES. mg-9. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE THAT SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, IF GRANTED, MAY BE MADE SUBJECT TO THE AVAILABILITY OF THE MUNICIPAL WATER LINE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. -2- IO. O'BRIEN BROTHERS STAND BY THEIR REQUEST FOR A WAIVER FROM ANY REQUIREMENT FOR THEIR CONSTRUCTING A SIDE- WALK ON INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD. 19_ 11, O'BRIEN BROTHERS UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON WISHES TO SIGNALIZE THE INTERSECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD AND KENNEDY DRIVE. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE TO CON- TRIBUTE THEIR PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE COST OF THAT SIGNAL, SUBJECT TO THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEIR SHARE WILL BE DETERMINED BY TRAFFIC FLOW REASONABLY ATTRIBUTED TO THE BUSINESS PARK NORTH SUBDIVISION ONLY. oK-12. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE TO CONVEY TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON AN EASEMENT FOR THE PLACEMENT OF FUTURE SEWER LINES EITHER WITHIN THE POTASH BROOK CONSERVATION DISTRICT OR AT SUCH OTHER LOCATIONS AS THE CITY ENGINEER AND O'BRIEN BROTHERS MAY AGREE UPON. 0V43. WITH REFERENCE TO MEMORANDUM FROM WILLIAM J. SZYMANSKI, CITY MANAGER, TO THE SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION DATED MARCH 10, 19708 RELATIVE TO THE AIRPORT PARKWAY SEWAGE FLOW, O'BRIEN BROTHERS REQUEST THAT ANY RE- FERENCE ON THE BUSINESS PARK NORTH PLAN SUBMITTED TO THE SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION AS TO ON -SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL BE iGNORED INASMUCH AS IT IS NOW UNDERSTOOD THAT SEWAGE CAPACITY IS AVAILABLE TO SERVE THE BUSINESS PARK NORTH DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL PLANS OF BUSINESS PARK NORTH WILL BE SHOWN AS PROVIDING MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TO EACH OF THE LOTS. o, 14. O'BRIEN BROTHERS REQUEST THAT THEY BE PERMITTED TO MOVE THE EASTERLY LOT LINES OF LOT 3 AND LOT 4 50 FEET EACH FURTHER TO THE EAST, AND WHERE NECESSARY THAT THEY BE PERMITTED TO MAKE AN APPROPRIATE ADJUSTMENT TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF -3- LOT 9 TO COORDINATE THE MOVEMENT OF THE LOT 4 EASTERLY LINE. THE ADJUSTMENT IN LOT LINES MENTIONED ABOVE IS IN CONJUNCTION WITH COMMENTS MADE ABOUT THE USEFULNESS OF LOT 4 AS SHOWN ON THE INITIAL PLANS. ov--15. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE TO INSTALL POWER AND TELEPHONE LINES UNDERGROUND. - S v"-6. O'BRIEN BROTHERS FURTHER AGREE TO THE PLACEMENT OF A BUFFER AREA AROUND THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES LYING TO THE NORTHEAST OF LOT 9. ---7le-17. O`BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE TO MODIFY LOT 9 TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY WILL CLOSE ITS BOUNDARIES AT THE SOUTHERLY END OF THE NARROW STRIP OF LAND HAVING FRONTAGE ON WILLISTON ROAD WHICH NARROW STRIP OF LAND WILL BECOME A PRIVATE RIGHT OF WAY SERVING LOT 9 AND LOT 10. o►L18. O'BRIEN BROTHERS WOULD LIKE TO DEFER ANY QUESTION ABOUT THE NEED FOR FILL TO SUCH TIME AS THOSE LOTS IN NEED OF FILL COME BEFORE THE SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW AT WHICH POINT IN TIME THE NEED FOR FILL CAN BE COORDINATED MORE REALISTICALLY WITH ACTUAL DEVELOPMENTAL PROPOSALS. 9. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGREE IN CONCEPT TO PROTECTIVE COVENANTS RELATIVE TO BUSINESS PARK NORTH, BUT TO DATE, HOWEVER, THERE ARE NO ISSUES APPARENT TO O'BRIEN BROTHERS WHICH NEED TO BE INCORPORATED IN PROTECTIVE COVENANTS. IF ANY ARE RAISED SUBSEQUENTLY, PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR THEM WILL BE CREATED. 20. MR. BRUCE HOUGHTON, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, PAULSEN ASSOCIATES, MAKES THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: (A) BASED ON PERMITTED USES FOR BUSINESS PLANNED Lin DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES DESCRIBED IN THE SOUTH BURLINGTON BONING REGULATIONS AND POTENTIAL USABLE LAND PER LOT RELATIVE TO EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY OF THE AREA, I ESTIMATED THE P.M. PEAK ROADWAY HOUR ENTERING AND EXITING TRIPS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. THESE ESTIMATES ARE REPRESENTED IN TABLE I. IN ADDITION, I TOTALED THE ENTERING AND EXITING TRIPS BY ACCESS POINT PLANNED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, THESE NUMBERS ARE REPRESENTED IN TABLE II. (B) I HAVE ANALYZED EACH ACCESS POINT AS IT RELATES TO OTHER PLANNED ACCESS POINTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATED THE PLANNED ACCESS POINTS AS THEY RELATE TO THE OLD FARM ROAD —INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD INTERSECTION, THE INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD—KENNEDY DRIVE INTERSECTION, AND THE KENNEDY DRIVE— caILLISTON ROAD —AIRPORT DRIVE INTERSECTION. TABLE III REPRESENTS APPROXIMATE DISTANCES BETWEEN VARIOUS POINTS OF REFERENCE. THE PLANNED ACCESS POINTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT ON INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD ARE REASONABLY SPACED (EQUIVALENT TO ONE CITY BLOCK) TO ACCOMMODATE VEHICLE MOVEMENTS INTO THE PARK. THE DISTANCE BETWEEN ACESS POINT 'C' AND OLD FARM ROAD IS SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW REASONABLE MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES WITHOUT RESTRICTIONS. IN ADDITION,'i'THE DISTANCE BETWEEN ACCESS POINT 'C' AND KENNEDY DRIVE IS SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW FOR REASONABLE MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES. ALTHOUGH THE DISTANCE BETWEEN ACESS POINT 'D' AND INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD IS SUFFICIENT (250') TO ALLOW BOTH LEFT AND RIGHT TURN VEHICLE MOVEMENTS EXITING LOT No. %, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT RIGHT TURN ENTRANCE AND RIGHT TURN EXIT BE THE ONLY ALLOWABLE VEHICLE MOVEMENTS AT ACCESS POINT 'D.' 10 ACCESS POINT 'E' IS LOCATED 450' FROM THE KENNEDY DRIVE-WILLISTON ROAD -AIRPORT DRIVE INTERSECTION, AND ITS LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE. WITH THE PROJECTED LOW ENTERING AND EXITING VOLUMES FOR LOT N0, 8 DURING THE P.M. PEAK ROADWAY HOUR, MINIMAL VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS WOULD BE EXPECTED AT THIS ACCESS POINT. ACCESS POINT 'F' IS REASONABLY LOCATED WITH RESPECT TO LOT N0, 9 AND LOT No, 10. ANY OTHER LOCATION OF THIS ACCESS WOULD SEVERELY LIMIT THE USEFULNESS OF LOT NO, 10. _ (C) THE INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD-KENNEDY DRIVE INTERSECTION SHOULD BE SIGNALIZED WITH A SEMI -ACTUATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEVICE WITH SIGNAL ACTUATION ON THE INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD APPROACH. SIGNALIZATION WILL ALLOW THIS INTERSECTION TO OPERATE AT LEVEL OF SERVICE A. (LEVEL OF CAPACITY APPROXIMATELY 65%) �-"� -�- . DlG.rxs L- / ,a-#4W1OU- ems, orZ- 25A - tl t4 t (D) EXISTING FIXED TIME TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION AT THE WILLISTON ROAD-KENNEDY DRIVE -AIRPORT DRIVE INTERSECTION SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH FULL ACTUATION TRAFFIC SIGNALS. VEHICLE SENSING DEVICES SHOULD BE PLACED ON EACH INTERSECTION APPROACH TO PROVIDE TOTAL VEHICLE RESPONSIVENESS IN ALLOCATING AVAILABLE GREEN TIME PER APPROACH, WITH FULL ACTUATION TRAFFIC CONTROL, THIS INTERSECTION SHOULD OPERATE AT LEVEL OF SERVICE C. (LEVEL OF CAPACITY APPROXIMATELY 78%). O'BRIEN BROTHERS DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT BRUCE HOUGHTON-, ENGINEER LOT NUMBER LOT #1 LOT#2 -tOT#3 LOT # 4 LOT #5 LOT # 6 LOT #% LOT #8 LOT #9 LOT # 10 TOTAL TRIPS TABLE I ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION BY LOT (P.M. PEAK ROADWAY HOUR) ENTERING TRIPS 15 15 10 10 15 10 165 10 30 10 290 EXITING TRIPS 30 30 25 9� 45 20 �t 165 �I 15 76 30 10 395 TABLE 11. ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION BY ACCESS POINT (P.M. PEAK ROADWAY HOUR) ACCESS LOT ENTERING EXITING POINT NUMBER TRIPS TRIPS_ A LOT # 1 30 60 LOT # 2 B LOT # 3 20 50 LOT # 4 C LOT # 5 110 / 150� �© 2� D LOT # 6 LOT # 7 D LOT # 7 80z- 80/ E LOT # 8 10 15 F LOT # 9 40 40 LOT # 10 X TOTAL TRIPS 2.9Q 395 TABLE III LOCATION OF ACCESS POINTS (INDUSTRIAL PARK RD-KENNEDY DR-WILLISTON RD) DESCRIPTION ACCESS 'A' TO ACCESS 'B' ACCESS 'B' To ACCESS 'C' ACCESS 'C' TO OLD FARM ROAD ACCESS 'C' TO KENNEDY DRIVE ACCESS 'D' TO INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD ACCESS 'D' To W,ILLISTON ROAD ACCESS 'E' To KENNEDY DRIVE ACCESS 'E' To ACCESS 'F' APPROXIMATE DISTANCE BETWEEN POINTS 600' 850' 325' 575' 250' 700' 425' 900' M E M O R A N U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: U.S. Immigration, Kimball Avenue Date: June 5, 1990 On June 4, 1990 I met with Mr. O'Brien and his Engineer Bob Krebs to address the items in my June 1, 1990 memo. Except for the signalization of the Kennedy Drive/Kimball Avenue intersection all the items have been addressed and they are as follows: 1. A sidewalk across the entire frontage was added. 2. A retention basin has been added for control of peak runoff. 3. The most easterly curb cut will be shared by the vacant lot when it is developed. 5. Kimball Avenue at the entrance will be restriped to provide three 10' lanes to accommodate the left turns. 6. existing curb cuts will be removed and replaced with standard barrier curbs. The City will extend the water main along Kimball Avenue which -we are required to do under the original land acquisition agreement when Kimball Avenue was built. INS BUILDING - KIMBALL AVENUE SEWER IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION ---------------------------- June 5, 1990 Computations per City of So. Burlington Sewer Impact Policy. Number of Employees I.N.S. 218 Other 50 Total 268 Gallons per Employee 15 Total Gallons 4020 Fee per Gallon $2.50 Total Fee $10,050 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 May 31, 1990 Mr. Winston Hart Allen Agency 252 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Mr. Daniel O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Realty P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Traffic Impact Evaluation - INS Office Building Kimball Avenue - South Burlington, Vermont FILE: 90061 Dear Messrs. Hart & O'Brien: As requested, we have evaluated potential traffic impacts resulting from the construction of the above referenced project to be located on Kimball Avenue in South Burlington. This office building will have a gross floor area of 66,030 square feet and will be occupied by approximately 266 employees. Access will be via two new curb cuts onto Kimball Avenue. Two major areas of concern to local and state officials are addressed herein; Traffic Congestion and Traffic Safety. The objective of this evaluation is to identify and assess potential traffic impacts created by this project in each of the above areas of concern, for both existing and future traffic conditions. For this evaluation, the study area includes three intersections in the immediate vicinity of this project: Kennedy Drive & Williston Road, Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue, and Williston Road & Shunpike Road. TRAFFIC CONGESTION Information regarding existing traffic volumes within the study area was obtained from the following sources: 1. Route Logs - Williston Road, Kennedy Drive and Kimball Avenue, Vermont Agency of Transportation. Design 0 Inspection * Studies 9 Permitting 0 Surveying Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Two 2. Automatic Traffic Recorder Counts: a) Sta D36 - Williston Road, Vermont Agency of Transportation, April 26 - May 3, 1988. b) Sta D451 - Kimball Avenue, Vermont Agency of Transportation, April 24 - May 1, 1989. c) Williston Road (west of Industrial Avenue), Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, May 1, 1989. d) Kennedy Drive (two locations north and south of Kimball Avenue), Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, June 29, 1989. e) Kimball Avenue (east of Kennedy Drive), Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, June 29, 1989. 3. Turning Movement Counts: a) Williston Road & Kennedy Drive, Vermont Agency of Transportation, July 13-14, 1988. b) Williston Road & Shunpike Road, Vermont Agency of Transportation, August 2-3, 1988. c) Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue, FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated, May 14-15, 1990. The results of the above referenced traffic counts were used to develop 1990 and 1995 design hour volumes at the aforementioned intersections. The calculation of future design hourly volumes (DHV) involves several steps. First, annual average daily volumes (AADT) were projected at an annual background growth rate of 5.0% to 1990 and 4.0% from 1990 to 1995. DHV's were then determined from the AADT's, using DHV/AADT ratios recommended by the VAOT. In this case, K-factors (DHV/AADT ratios) of 12% and 11% were used for the 1990 and 1995 design years, respectively. The net result of these calculations is a DHV growth rate, from 1990 to 1995, of approximately 2.2% annually. For this evaluation, DHV's for both A.M. and P.M. peak weekday hours were calculated. The above growth rate is relatively high, particularly in light of recent statewide traffic growth trends. It was chosen, however, to account for the high level of development which is presently occurring nearby in Williston. Similarly, the lower 1995 K-factor was selected because of existing capacity limitations of major roadways and intersections adjacent to the study area. Once background traffic volumes were determined, it was necessary to estimate the volumes and directional patterns of the additional traffic which will be generated by this project. An estimate of the traffic generation for this project was developed through the use of vehicular trip generation rates from FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Three the "ITE Informational Report, Trip Generation, 4th Edition". That report outlines the results of trip generation studies for numerous land -uses. For this project, the applicable land -use category is "General Office Building". Table 1 illustrates the estimated trip generation. In this case, a good correlation was obtained between the trip generation estimated on both the gross floor area and the projected number of employees. TABLE 1 PROJECTED VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION Enter Exit Total Average Weekday 503 503 1,006 vte/day A.M. Peak Hour 122 18 140 vte/hour P.M. Peak Hour 22 117 139 vte/hour - i The directional distribution of project -generated traffic was estimated from the distribution of population and projected trave routes within Chittenden County. Appendix A illustrates the resulting A.M. and P.M. peak hour directional distributions of project -generated traffic. Potential traffic congestion impacts were determined by performing intersection capacity analyses at the three intersections within the study area. The methodology used to determine intersection capacity was obtained from the "Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1985". Traffic conditions were analyzed for a number of existing and future development scenarios. By doing so, a better understanding of existing versus future conditions and the impact of this project can be obtained. The intersection capacity analyses also include an assessment of geometric and/or signal timing improvements needed to maintain desirable levels of traffic congestion or to mitigate any adverse impacts specifically created by this project. Levels of traffic congestion are defined by several parameters. For example, signalized intersections use vehicular delay (seconds per vehicle), arterial highways use average running speed (mph), and unsignalized intersections use reserve capacity (vph). In all cases, those parameters are subdivided into ranges which are then referred to as levels of service. Level of Service A represents very low loading with ample reserve capacity and no vehicular delays; C represents average conditions; and E represents a street FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Four or intersection at capacity, causing long queues and vehicular delays. One last range, F, occurs when traffic volumes exceed the available capacity of an intersection or street. Urban highways and intersections are generally designed to maintain Level of Service D or better during DHV conditions. One notable exception occurs at unsignalized intersections, where Level of Service E is not considered to be unreasonable on minor street approaches. Appendix B details the criteria for levels of service at signalized and unsignalized intersections. For clarity, the results of the intersection capacity analyses at each of the three intersections are presented separately. Williston Road & Kennedv Drive This intersection is presently a major point of traffic congestion despite being signalized and having multi -lane approaches. The results of capacity analyses of 1990 and 1995 DHV conditions without this project confirmed that this intersection is presently over -capacity with Level of Service F resulting. The results of capacity analyses of existing conditions without this project indicate that during 1990 A.M. DHV conditions, the westbound Williston Road left -turn and southbound Kennedy Drive movements experience F, while other movements experience levels of service ranging from B to D. By 1995, all movements on the eastbound Williston Road approach and the westbound Williston Road through/right-turn movements will drop to F also. During 1990 P.M. DHV conditions without this project, all movements on the westbound Williston Road approach plus the southbound Kennedy Drive left -turn movement experience F. Additionally, the eastbound Williston through/right-turn movements experience E. By 1995, those latter eastbound movements plus the northbound Airport Drive left-turn/through movements will drop to F also. The above capacity problems at this intersection have been previously identified, notably in a study entitled "Traffic Systems Management Study, JHK & Associates, July 1987" which was prepared for the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Five That study recommended several areas of geometric improvements plus the replacement of the existing pre -timed signal controller with a fully -actuated one. Those improvements, if implemented, would significantly reduce existing levels of traffic congestion without this project. Overall intersection levels of service during projected 1995 A.M. and P.M. DHV conditions without this project would be D and E, respectively. Those results were obtained with modifications to the existing signal phasing plus one relatively minor change in the northbound lane assignments. The latter change was to use double left -turn lanes in combination with the through lane; making the three northbound lanes exclusive left -turn, combination left-turn/through and exclusive right -turn, respectively. The impact of this project was determined by superimposing project -generated traffic onto the projected 1995 design hour volumes. The capacity analyses were then repeated, with overall results of D and E during 1995 A.M. and P.M. DHV conditions, respectively. The results of the capacity analyses at this intersection are summarized in Table 2. Detailed results are also enclosed under separate cover. These results show that even with this project, future traffic congestion conditions at this intersection will be substantially improved over existing conditions. Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue This intersection is also a major point of existing traffic congestion, primarily because traffic volumes have grown to a level where traffic signalization and dedicated turning lanes are needed. The results of capacity analyses of 1990 DHV conditions without this project confirmed that this intersection presently experiences Level of Service F on the Kimball Avenue and Treetop Condominium approaches. A signal warrant evaluation of this intersection was prepared by the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission in June 1989. The results of that evaluation found that of the eleven warrants, all five volume -related warrants were satisfied. Typically, the satisfaction of only one warrant is required in order to install traffic signal control. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Six TABLE 2 WILLISTON ROAD & KENNEDY DRIVE DHV LEVELS OF SERVICE & DELAYS' Existing Geometrics - Without Project A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Approach/Lanes 1990 1995 1990 1995 Eastbound LT/TH C ( 17 ) F ( 82 ) B£--' ( 9 ) B"12 ( 10 ) TH/RT C (17) F (82) E (45) F (95) Westbound LT/TH Fr-`2 * Ff`' * F >f F ' TH/RT D (31) F (63) F * F Northbound LT/TH C (16) C (17) D (27) E (49) RT C (20) C (22) C (17) C (19) Southbound LT F F F * F TH/RT B (13) B (14) B (14) B (15) OVERALL F F F F With Geometric Improvements Approach/Lanes Eastbound LT TH TH/RT Westbound LT TH TH/RT Northbound LT LT/TH RT Southbound LT TH/RT OVERALL 1995 w/o Project A.M. P.M. 1995 with Project A.M. P.M. D (29) D (29) D (29) D (29) D (35) D (33) E (47) D (35) D (35) D (33) E (47) D (35) E (54) F (73) E (54) F (73) B (13) D (29) B (13) D (29) B (13) D (29) B (13) D (29) D (33) E (53) D (35) F (95) D (27) E (45) D (28) F (63) D (35) C (22) D (35) C (22) E (53) F (107) E (53) F (107) D (26) D (32) D (28) D (32) D (31) E (42) D (35) E (46) Delays expressed in seconds per vehicle. ' Operates as a de -facto exclusive left -turn lane. Delays are not calculated when the volume/capacity ratio exceeds 1.20 on any lane group(s). FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Nine Superimposing project -generated traffic onto existing and future design hour volumes, and repeating the capacity analyses found that future levels of service with this project during 1990 and 1995 DHV conditions would continue to be E on both the northbound and southbound approaches. The results of the capacity analyses at this intersection are summarized in Table 4. Detailed results are also enclosed under separate cover. TABLE 4 WILLISTON ROAD & SHUNPIKE ROAD DHV LEVELS OF SERVICE & DELAYS Without Protect A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Approach 1990 1995 1990 1995 Eastbound LT B D C D Westbound LT B C C D Northbound LT/TH/RT D D D E Southbound LT/TH/RT E E E E With Protect A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Approach 1995 1995 Eastbound LT D D Westbound LT C D Northbound LT/TH/RT E E Southbound LT/TH/RT E E Additionally, even with this project, future traffic volumes at this intersection during peak periods do not satisfy the warrants for the installation of a traffic signal. TRAFFIC SAFETY The safety of vehicular traffic traveling two and from this project is largely dependent on the geometric and physical conditions of existing and proposed streets and intersections, projected traffic volumes, and the presence of adequate traffic control devices. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Eight TABLE 3 KENNEDY DRIVE & KIMBALL AVENUE DHV LEVELS OF SERVICE & DELAYS' Unsignalized / Existing Geometrics - Without Project _Approach/Lanes Eastbound LT TH/RT Westbound LT TH/RT Northbound LT Southbound LT A.M. Peak Hour 1990 1995 F F C D F F A B A A C D Signalized and with Geometric Improvements 1995 w/o Project A.M. P.M. _Approach/Lanes Eastbound LT/TH RT Westbound LT/TH RT Northbound LT TH/RT or TH` RT ' Southbound LT TH/RT OVERALL P.M. Peak Hour 1990 1995 E E B C F F C C A A A A 1995 with Project A.M. P.M. E (42) C (22) D (31) C (21) C (17) B (15) C (16) B (13) D (29) D (32) D (26) D (29) B (11) B (13) B (7) B (12) D (29) D (29) D (29) D (29) D (39) D (27) D (33) D (26) - - C (22) C (15) E (48) C (24) D (30) C (24) B (8) B (12) B (9) B (14) D (30) C (21) C (23) C (20) ' Delays expressed in seconds per vehicle. £" De -facto exclusive left -turn lane. With Project scenario only. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Seven With signalization and exclusive left -turn lanes on both Kennedy Drive approaches, overall intersection levels of service during projected 1995 A.M. and P.M. DHV conditions without this project would be D and C, respectively. It should be noted that the present width of Kennedy Drive is adequate for a three -lane cross section, and that the only work required to provide those left - turn lanes is to install pavement markings. With only the above improvements and this project, the 1995 A.M. DHV condition drops to E, overall. The eastbound (Treetop) left- turn/through lane and northbound (Kennedy Drive) through/right- turn lane, however, will operate at F during the 1995 A.M. DHV. During the 1995 P.M. DHV, the overall intersection operates at C; while the above two lane groups operate at D. An examination of future turning movement volumes indicated that an exclusive northbound Kennedy Drive right -turn lane and related adjustments to the signal timing would significantly increase overall intersection capacity. Those additional improvements, when incorporated into the capacity analyses with this project, improved overall intersection levels of service to C during projected 1995 A.M. and P.M. DHV conditions, respectively. The results of the capacity analyses,at this intersection are summarized in Table 3. Detailed results are also enclosed under separate cover. These results show that even with this project, future traffic congestion conditions at this intersection will be substantially improved over existing conditions. Williston Road & Shunpike Road Shunpike Road is one of three possible routes linking Williston Road and Kimball Avenue. As such, it is relatively lightly traveled at the present time. Recent commercial development on the north side of Williston Road directly opposite Shunpike Road, however, has significantly increased turning movements at this intersection. The results of unsignalized intersection capacity analyses at this intersection without this project indicate that both the northbound Shunpike Road and southbound approaches presently experience Level of Service E during 1990 and 1995 DHV conditions. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Ten The primary factor affecting traffic safety at the proposed access to this project is the availability of adequate sight distances. Kimball Avenue is posted at a 35 mph speed limit in this immediate area. Based on prevailing off-peak speeds of 40-45 mph, and a minimum of 7 seconds visibility time of oncoming traffic, the recommended minimum intersection sight distance equals 460 feet. Existing available sight distances from the two proposed curb cuts considerably exceed that distance in both directions. The most recent available five-year (1984-1988) accident histories of the three intersections within the study area of this evaluation were also examined. For clarity, the results at each of the three intersections are presented separately. Williston Road & Kennedv Drive Eighty-five (85) reported accidents occurred at this intersection during the above five-year period, resulting in an accident rate of 1.90 accidents per million vehicles. In comparison, the statewide average accident rate at similar intersections equaled 0.58 accidents per million vehicles. Because the actual rate exceeds the statewide average, the critical accident rate was also calculated for this intersection. The critical rate is a statistical test of the expected variability in the actual rate at a given location. At this intersection, if the actual rate exceeds the calculated critical rate of 0.89 accidents per million vehicles, the probability of it being an unsafe intersection equals 99.5%. That being the case, this intersection is classified as a high accident location. To better understand the possible causes of the poor accident history at this intersection, the types and causes of each accident were tabulated. Of the 65 accidents, 60, or 71%, involved vehicles turning in opposing directions. The causes of the 85 accidents were slightly more diverse, however the most frequent cause, failure to yield right-of-way, accounted for 53 accidents, or 62% of the total. These types and causes of accidents are indicative of a high - volume intersection lacking appropriate turning lanes and signal phasing. The signal phasing is important primarily in its treatment of left -turns. Protected left -turn phasing is much safer at high -volume multi -lane intersections. That type of FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Eleven phasing and additional turning lanes have been incorporated into the future capacity analyses and proposed improvements at this intersection. Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue Fourteen (14) reported accidents occurred at this intersection during the 1984-1988 period, resulting in an accident rate of 0.60 accidents per million vehicles. That rate exceeds the statewide average (0.58) for similar intersections by a small amount. Consequently, this intersection would not be considered to be an unsafe one. The proposed improvements, which include signalization and additional turning lanes, are projected to substantially improve future traffic safety conditions at this intersection. Williston Road & Shunpike Road Fourteen (14) accidents were reported at this intersection during the same five-year period, resulting in an accident rate of 0.39 accidents per million vehicles. That rate is less than the statewide average for similar intersections; therefore this intersection would not be considered to be an unsafe one. CONCLUSION This report has evaluated potential traffic impacts resulting from the proposed INS office building to be located on Kimball Avenue in South Burlington. Existing levels of traffic congestion were found to require immediate attention at two major intersections within the study area of this evaluation: Williston Road & Kennedy Drive and Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue. The geometric and traffic control improvements necessary to restore reasonable levels of traffic congestion at those two intersections have been previously identified in traffic studies prepared by the Chittenden County ,Regional Planning Commission. They are summarized on the following page. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart & O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Twelve 1. Williston Road & Kennedy Drive a) Construction of exclusive left -turn lanes on both Williston Road approaches. b) Construction of an exclusive left -turn lane on the Kennedy Drive approach. c) Replacement of the existing pretimed traffic signal controller with one that is fully actuated and which can provide protected left -turn phasing. 2. Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue a) Installation of traffic signal control. This signal would be semi -actuated and coordinated with the one at Williston Road & Kennedy Drive. It would also provide protected left -turn phasing on both Kennedy Drive approaches. b) Installation of pavement markings to provide exclusive left -turn lanes on both Kennedy Drive approaches. With the above improvements, the projected traffic congestion impacts of this project can then be addressed. Two areas of additional geometric and signal timing improvements were found to be specifically warranted by this project, however. They include: 1. Williston Road & Kennedy Drive a) Reassignment of the northbound Kennedy Drive lane assignments so as to provide double left -turn lanes. b) Modification of the signal phasing so as to provide split northbound/southbound phasing. This, combined with the above, will provide protected left -turn phasing on these two approaches. 2. Kennedy Drive & Kimball Avenue a) Construction of a northbound exclusive right -turn lane on Kennedy Drive. The effect of the above improvements at these two intersections will be to substantially improve existing traffic congestion conditions and effectively mitigate any impacts created by this project. Similarly, any potential traffic safety impacts of this project will also be effectively mitigated by the above improvements. Overall, future traffic safety conditions within the study are of this evaluation will be significantly improved over existing conditions. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Messrs. Hart $ O'Brien FILE: 90061 May 31, 1990 Page Thirteen We wish to thank you for this opportunity to be of service. We remain available to present the results of this evaluation to state and local officials. Should you have any questions, or if we may be of additional assistance, please feel free to contact US. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED p� '1 , �V)1(j11t14yfy_ Roq/Zr Dickinson, P.E. cc. w/ enclosure John Osgood Susan Haitsma Richard Spokes FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services APPENDIX A PROJECTED PEAK HOUR DISTRIBUTIONS OF PROJECT —GENERATED TRAFFIC FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services JOB looGI - `HIV-- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 /3 SHEET OF 2 CALCULATED BY Rj DATE J ^ -10 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE A,. I C.4K 1101Wa2 /P' Il' rxaau xtl�w.. &*K "oun. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 JOB ft"61 �i✓� SHEET NO. OF �G CALCULATED BY RJJ-D DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE 21111 PczoX 1101.[41 -r)Q1P ;1�1.�TRIRU�I[�r`J PROM NE'8.§ Inc., Whc1 M— 01/21. APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR INTERSECTIONS Signalized Level of Vehicular Delay Service (sec/veh) A 0 - 5 B 5 - 15 C 15 - 25 D 25 - 40 E 40 - 60 F >60 Unsignalized Reserve Capacity (veh/hour) >400 300 - 400 200 - 300 100 - 200 0 - 100 <0 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services TELEPHONE MEMO Name: , W� V-VA Contact:IG lira;,✓, .C...�_ Signature Date: GZ*z4a Subject 17L /S- �` i �lv y- 4.3 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: June 5, 1990 agenda items Date: June 1, 1990 3) BIA MASTER PLAN UPDATE Representatives of Burlington International Airport (BIA) will be at Tuesday's meeting to present the draft. BIA Mater Plan Update. This will be an opportunity for the City to discuss the plan and provide input. 4) BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT, LOTS 1 & 2. KIMBALL AVENUE Daniel and Leo O'Brien propose a revision to their original 11 lot Business Park North subdivision on Kimball Avenue. They are proposing to adjust the boundary between lots 1 and 2. Lots 1 and 2 are now 3.4 and 4.4 acres, respectively and will be changed to 1.3 and 6.4 acres, respectively. I.N.S. Partnership is pro- posing to construct a 66,000 square foot office building on the 6.4 acre lot (lot 2). Lot size/frontage: Both lots meet minimum lot size and frontage requirements. Access: Access to both lots should be shared and limited to one driveway. The City has been successful in limiting curb cuts on Kimball Avenue and should continue to encourage this practice. Other: The plat must be stamped by a licensed engineer/surveyor prior to recording. 5) I.N.S.. KIMBALL AVENUE South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership proposes to build a new three story 66,000 square foot facility for the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. The property is part of the Business Park North subdivision. The parcel is zoned I-C. It is bounded on the north and south by vacant lots, to the east by a ravine and the Woodlands and to the west by Kimball Avenue. 1 Memorandum - Planning June 5, 1990 agenda items June 1, 1990 Page 2 Access/Circulation: Current plans show access by two curb cuts. It has been recommended that access be limited to one curb cut. Plans show the current main access as having a 41 foot divided curb cut. Circulation is adequate. Bill Szymanski recommends that Kimball Avenue be widened to allow a separate left turn lane into the development.. Setbacks/Coverage: The plan meets setback requirements. Build- ing coverage is 8% (30% maximum allowed) and total coverage is 44% (70% maximum allowed). Parking: The use requires 264 parking spaces according to the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. 286 spaces are proposed including 12 handicapped spots, although these spaces are 1 foot short of the 20 foot depth requirement. Sewer: Based on 330 employees and 15 gallons/employee the build- ing needs a sewer allocation of 4,950 gpd. A $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. Traffic: A traffic impact study has not yet been submitted. The applicant was informed that a study was required to determine the project's impact on Kimball Avenue/Kennedy Drive and Kennedy Drive/Williston Road. Based on an estimate of 146 peak hour trips to be generated by this project, a contribution of $1,444 is required to the Willis- ton Road Intersection Improvement Fund (Area 2). This fund includes contributions toward a new light at Kimball Avenue/Kennedy Drive and various improvements to the Williston Road/Kennedy Drive intersection. A traffic study would determine whether a new light is needed for this project (I believe it is) and whether certain geometric improvements are needed. If cer- tain geometric improvements are needed and are not included in this fund, then the applicant should contribute toward them. Landscaping: The project requires $57,500 in new landscaping. The plan is valued at approximately $50,250. The plan calls for three kinds of crabapple, White Spruce, Red Maple, Austrian Pine and a variety of evergreen and deciduous shrubs. The site is well wooded to the north and east sides, although there is a direct view of Millham Court across the ravine on the east side. The plan calls for planting of 6 to 10 foot spruce along the east side, which should block the view. The south side has a thin row of mature trees on the property line. There is a conservation zone running along the north and east sides of the property. 2 Memorandum - Planning June 5, 1990 agenda items June 1, 1990 Page 3 I recommend that a staggered, landscaped berm be provided along the Kimball Avenue frontage. This would help hide or at least breakup this huge expanse of pavement and parked cars. Building Heights: The proposed height is 45 feet. The Planning Commission must approve this building height. Other: The plan should show the limits of the 100-year flood plain. 6) MEADOWBROOK CONDOS, PHASE V. JOY DRIVE The sketch plan for this application was reviewed by the Commis- sion on 4/10/90. My memo of that meeting is enclosed. Minutes are not yet available. Drainage: There are two drainage issues related to this applica- tion. Since this is a revision to the original 50 unit application. The first issue relates to existing drainage prob- lems within the development. The second relates to drainage impacts resulting from these 11 units. In regards to the first issue, the condo association hired Knight Engineering to make recommendations on improvements to remedy existing problems. A plan was prepared showing recommended improvements. As a result of a law suit, South Burlington Realty is required to pay the Condo Association a certain amount of money so that the Association may carry out the recommended improvements. In regards to the second issue, the applicant is proposing drain- age improvments to accommodate the 11 new units and parking. The applicant is committing to doing the improvements recommended by Knight Engineering which are needed to accommodate the 11 new units. These improvements are shown on pages 1 and 2 of the plans. The other improvements recommended by Knight Engineering will be the responsibility of the Condo Association using the money paid by South Burlington Realty. 3 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: June 5, 1990 agenda items Date: June 1, 1990 5) U.S. IMMIGRATION. KIMBALL AVENUE 1. There should be a sidewalk across the frontage of this par- cel. 2. There must be a retention basin to control the runoff from the parking and building area. 3. The lot should be served by a single curb cut. 4. The Kennedy Drive - Kimball AVenue intersection should be signalized. 5. Kimball Avenue at entrance should be widened to accommodate left turns. 6. Any existing curb cuts shall be closed by removing existing depressed curb and constructing standard barrier curb. 6) MEADOWBROOK, JOY DRIVE Engineer for project should get together with Engineer for the Association and Mr. Gil Barlow of Knight Engineers, Inc. to be sure that all their concerns have been addressed. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 June 1, 1990 Mr. Daniel O'Brien South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership 1855 Williston Road P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Boundary Line Adjustment and INS Building, Kimball Avenue Dear Dan: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also en- closed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 5, 1990 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. n ere y, 7 YJ e Weith, ,City Planner Encls cc: Chip Hart JW/mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: June 5, 1990 agenda items Date: June 1, 1990 3) BIA MASTER PLAN UPDATE Representatives of Burlington International "Airport (BIA) will be at Tuesday's meeting to present the draft BIA Mater Plan Update. This will be an opportunity for the City to discuss the plan and provide input. 4) BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT, LOTS 1 & 2, KIMBALL AVENUE Daniel and Leo O'Brien propose a revision to their original 11 lot Business Park North subdivision on Kimball Avenue. They are proposing to adjust the boundary between lots 1 and 2. Lots 1 and 2 are now 3.4 and 4.4 acres, -respectively and will be changed to 1.3 and 6.4 acres, respectively. I.N.S. Partnership is pro- posing to construct a 66,000 square foot office building on the 6.4 acre lot (lot 2). Lot size/frontage: Both lots meet minimum lot size and frontage requirements. Access: Access to both lots should be shared and limited to one driveway. The City has been successful in limiting curb cuts on Kimball Avenue and should continue to encourage this practice. Other: The plat must be stamped by a licensed engineer/surveyor prior to recording. 5) I.N.S.. KIMBALL AVENUE South Burlington I.N.S. Partnership proposes to build a new three story 66,000 square foot facility for the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. The property is part of the Business Park North subdivision. The parcel is zoned I-C. It is bounded on the north and south by vacant lots, to the east by a ravine and the Woodlands and to the west by Kimball Avenue. 1 0§nutb Nurhugtou 3ftre Department f 575 Dorset street - - s *outh Nurlingtnn, Uermnnt 054111 , OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE. SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Chief Goddette Re: June 5, 1990 agenda items Date: June 1, 1990 5) UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION BUILDING, KIMBALL AVENUE a. The water system for fire protection must be a looped sys- tem. b. There must be 3-hydrants at a location approved by the Fire Department. C. The water system must supply at least 2500 gpm. 6) MEADOWBROOK CONDO'S, JOY DRIVE Plans have been reviewed by this department and all the changes requested for have been made and at this time I do not see a problem in given proper protection. SCHEDULE F Certification of Service You are required by Section 6084 of 10 V.S.A. to send notice and a copy of your application to the municipality, the municipal and regional planning commission in which the land is located and any adjacent Vemont municipality, municipal or regional planning commission if the land is located on a boundary on or before the date of filing yuor application with the district commission. In order to verify that the statutory parties to the application have received copies of the application and thus avoid delay caused by improper distribution of the application, have a representative of the parties sign this form when they receive the application. You may, in the alternative, send copies of the notice and application by Certified U.S. Mail and list the names below. Applicant(s) Name SOUTH BURLINGTON I.N.S. PARTNERSHIP_ I, the undersigned, have received a copy of an Act 250 application for the above appli (s). or the selectmen, aldermen, or trustees for the municipal planning commission for the regional planning commission for an adjacent municipality, if any* 3 i/ ° date date date date for an adjacent planning commission, if any* date for an adjacent regional planning commission, date if any* I hereby certify that I have forwarded a complete copy of this application to each of the parties entitled..to no ace pursuant to 10 V.S.A. ection 6084. 3 Applicants)/Agent Signature % Datig ' Attach additional sheets if more than one town is adjacent to the project lands. 3/89 : SCHEDF.DOC 't11It1� tE"c"�iEEtt .?P.'; DCpcartinrnt f 57,5 '43ur_,rt �mtih +��urlitt�ti�tt. 1�icrini�nt [154113 ��' � % (802) 658-7960 TLz; L.4 M. CA Vt.. Ke'Ai T S TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE DATE: TUESDAY MAY 15,1990 1• UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION BUILDING KIMBALL AVE. Plans were reviewed by the fire department and the following is required if we are to give proper fire protection; A. THE WATER SYSTEM FOR FIRE PROTECTION MUST BE A LOOPED SYSTEM. B. THERE MUST BE 3-HYDRANTS AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. C. THE WATER SYSTEM MUST SUPPLY AT LEAST 2500 GPM. 2. MEADOWBROOK CONDO'S JOY DRIVE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND ALL THE CHANGES REQUESTED FOR HAVE BEEN MADE AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM IN GIVEN PROPER PROTECTION. DRAFT MEMO From: William J. Szymanski City Engineer COMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, 3060 WILLISTON ROAD 1. There should be improvements to the intersection. At the very least provisions for left turns. This portion of Williston Road is State and any work at the intersection must be approved by them. 2. New building should be sewered with a separate line not to the existing building. 3. Site shall drain toward the north. 1. There should be a sidewalk across the frontage of this par- cel. 2. There must be a retention basin to control the runoff from the parking and building area. 3. The lot should be served by a single curb cut. 4. The Kennedy Drive - Kimball Avenue intersection should be signalized. 5. Kimball Avenue at entrance should be widened to accommodate left turns. 6. Any existing curb cuts shall be closed by removing existing depressed curb and constructing standard barrier curb. MEADOWBROOK. JOY DRIVE Engineer for project should get together with Engineer for Asso- ciation and Mr. Gil Barlow of Knight Engineers, Inc. to be sure that all their concerns have been addressed. WESSEL SUBDIVISION. VAN SICKLEN ROAD 1. Three units out of twenty have the benefit of the City main- taining their street. This does not seem right. The Franco development on Airport Parkway, developed by Armand Senesac, has a short cul-de-sac with 4 units, this may be incorporated in this plan. 2. The City street must terminate with a tear drop type cul-de- sac. MANI �I9T �Y�lBot, 801 ti� �Monl 1J1�M� �izE Q7� AIZ /W lcvm,14 eePIOM6. 5 2104 " lz -4 111 SG 4-r 4-1,WIlS51,q AAA %a j„ JL Jvt*mevs `ShlPl ill/I ' -5Afi C,�i' JV N 10 /DO M r MAWS fllaw N& ueAIzlz -3 8a� - s t�QG ►MALV6 FA9l(4:fojE CV15 r ,E Z/z 3" M� ►^'1RW5 SPP=�'GMQ1 ��S�Fi� 3-3�z '` ' 1 �P�CiM�i�l 2 c� 6 32C i 7 ' t%fI z/ /P3 V9 / /1 I / i LamA e fr) 5 GONT'h m6ot. gOf Nmt�, 60mmo►A NAME .5a Coy. P�,3 Pw UlA WBt-s>; 5MA69 sue' 'e- q z = 3 C8r FN I nNU,S N VdA PrN ?IN6 8&/O` 7 x t 6 5* .So = 11 SS PNZ flHU-5 NIURA &)-') l" )AN fW5 (-7' /9 K a 2_ = 17 ` r �,- KFJ lC)D1DG6NMN'PJM' MM 1;WPOPOiPR N 25�-No Zo of-5 x 3pr• =: -76 -rAK T L-tA AMEWAA ' Ra--MOND' Fl �OND Uri Z17-3" Y >c 17� = 6 F-0 -N <AxVS M4EM NDEN51f'Of S' PEA 30-,Vl to Bt e 1 z = 44 XtP TSM 2 328 07 \- \ _ 326 326 ►Z AK i 328 z 4q' Y 7 y OCg �326 --' _o- /� popa d son 6 0 . . . . . . . . • r r r . • • . . . . . .. . r . r ... . • • i • •. • . • . A) I - a T%;-7 e_ — G, r 3 fic, f PS GG,0oC) A City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 May 21, 1990 Mr. Daniel O'Brien O'Brien Bros P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: INS Building, Kimball Avenue Dear Dan: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments from Bill Szymanski and Chief Goddette. Please contact me if you have any questions. nc rel , oe Weith, City Planner 2 Encls JW/mcp DRAFT MEMO From: William J. Szymanski City Engineer COMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. 3060 WILLISTON ROAD 1. There should be improvements to the intersection. At the very least provisions for left turns. This portion of Williston Road is State and any work at the intersection must be approved by them. 2. New building should be sewered with a separate line not to the existing building. 3. Site shall drain toward the north. U.S. IMMIGRATION. KIMBALL AVENUE 1. There should be a sidewalk across the frontage of this par- cel. 2. There must be a retention basin to control the runoff_ from the parking and building area. 3. The lot should be served by a single curb cut. 4. The Kennedy Drive - Kimball Avenue intersection should be signalized. 5. Kimball Avenue at entrance should be widened to accommodate left turns. 6. Any existing curb cuts shall be closed by removing existing depressed curb and constructing standard barrier curb. MEADOWBROOK. JOY DRIVE Engineer for project should get together with Engineer for Asso- ciation and Mr. Gil Barlow of Knight Engineers, Inc. to be sure that all their concerns have been addressed. 3nutb N urlington N ire Department � f 575 BnrsEt --ftert ��` 0�uutb +ISurlington. ]fermont 05403 1 (802) 658-7960 P lj'^ TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE R E : i"i`L�"lafS DATE: TUESDAY MAY 15,1990 1. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION BUILDING KIMBALL AVE. Plans were reviewed by the fire department and the following is required if we are to give proper fire protection; A. THE WATER SYSTEM FOR FIRE PROTECTION MUST BE A LOOPED SYSTEM. B. THERE MUST BE 3-HYDRANTS AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. C. THE WATER SYSTEM MUST SUPPLY AT LEAST 2500 GPM. 2. MEADOWBROOK CONDO'S JOY DRIVE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND ALL THE CHANGES REQUESTED FOR HAVE BEEN MADE AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM IN GIVEN PROPER PROTECTION. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 May 21, 1990 Mr. Chris D'Elia O'Brien Brothers Agency P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: INS Building, Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. D'Elia: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 The proposed 66,000 square foot INS building on Kimball Avenue will require a sewer allocation of 4,950 gpd. This is based on an estimate of 330 employees at 15 gallons per employee. This facility would be served by the City's Airport Parkway treatment facility which at this time has sufficient capacity to handle such demand. Please note that this letter does not constitute official sewer allocation approval by the City. Sewer allocation is granted as a part of site plan approval. The above referenced project is scheduled for site plan review by the South Burlington Planning Commission on 6/5/90. Please contact me if you have any questions. S- rely �c Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public near- ing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 5, 1990 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Revised Final Plat application of South Burlington Realty Company to revise and construct the 11 remaining units (Phase V) of a 50 unit planned residential development known as Meadowbrook Condominiums, Joy Drive. The parcel is bounded on the north and east by the University of Vermont., on the west by Rice. Memorial High School, Burlington Country Club, and Hall Communications, Inc., and on the south by I-189 2) Revised Final Plat application of Daniel and Leo O'Brien for resubdivision of lots 1 and 2 of the eleven lot Business Park North subdivision on Kimball Avenue. The proposal is to adjust the boundary line between lots 1 and 2 thereby creating a 6.43 acre parcel (lot 2) and a 1.26 acre parcel (lot 1). The properties are bounded on the east by A. Palmer, on the north by H. Mayo, on the west by D. O'Brien and on the south by Kimball Avenue. Copies of the plants are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess, Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission May 19, 1990 May 9, 1990 Mr. Joe Wieth City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Joe, As you are aware O'Brien Brothers Agency was awarded the Immigration and Naturalization facility to be located on Kimball Ave in South Burlington. The project will consist of one three story building measuring 66,000 square feet. The facility will be used for office space and they are anticipating 5 employees per 1,000 square feet. That would gives us a total of 330 employees and based on 15 gallons per employee we would need a sewer allocation of 4,950 gallons to service the building. Since this project comes under the Act 250 jurisdiction, a letter is needed from your office stating that the building will not place a burden on the cities municipal system. Thank you for your help in this matter and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact my office. Sincerely, Christopher D'Elia O'Brien Brothers Agency Incorporated 1855 Williston Road P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 802-658-5000 Fax 658-5002 KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. May 8, 1990 Mr. Joseph Weith City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Business Park North Lot 1 and Lot 2 Dear Joe: 10 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Please find attached four (4) copies of a marked up plan showing the proposed adjustment to the property line between Lots 1 and 2. Lot 1 will now have approximately 1.26 acres and in access of 290 feet of frontage and Lot 2 will have 6.43 acres with at least 350 feet of frontage. We will submit another drawing as soon as possible showing just Lots 1 and 2 with the new dimensions. /VVerytruours , / :4h-, )obert C. Krebs Attachments CC: Chip Hart John Osgood Dan O'Brien Mark D'Angelo INS BUILDING - KIMBALL AVENUE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION ------------------------------ May 1, 1990 Computations per City of So. Burlington Traffic Impact Policy, revised April 15, 1987. Size of building (SF) 57,200 Trip ends/1,000 2.84 INS Building Trip Ends 162.4 Impact Area 2 Trip Ends 10,114 INS Building Share 1.61% Impact Area 2 Total Cost $100,000 INS Building Share in Cost $1,606.17 January 14, 1986 Mr. Alan Palmer 4050 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Alan: Be advised that your request to fill an area off Kimball Avenue has been granted approval by the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Your approval is subject to those requirements set forth in a memorandum from the C i ty Eng-ineer ( a copy being enclosed) anal that you obtain any and all permits required by the State and Federal agencies. Your proposal is also subject to approval by the Planning Commission. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp 1 Enc 1 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: RDR Enterprises, Inc., Lot No. I, Access Road fill 1. Fill shall be clean. No stumps or other organic material. 2. Erosion control shall be maintained during filling and until growth on the fill is established. 3. Drainage outlet pipes shall include stone riprap to existing stream. 4. Guard post shall be placed at least two feet from edge of 24 foot drive. 3 ~ Y,; (802) 658-7956 r I W liriir MYrA9111i0i�1��-�I����I 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON D o VERMONT, 05402 z h Q4t RESOUa(:k TO: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator FR0t1: Natural Resources Committee RE: RDR Enterprises, Inc., Lot I, Access Road Fill DATE: Friday, January 10, 1986 The Natural Resources Committee is very much in support of the memo from William Szymanski specifying four criteria. The committee is concerned with possible erosion problems at a later time. Upon inspection of the site it was not possible to determine what the topography of the land is or what possible erosion patterns may exist, however we feel it is a sensitive area. The Natural Resources Committee would support the proposal with permission to inspect the site in the Spring and propose changes if anything further needs to be done. In our opinion, better location of the road would be combined with the lot adjacent to the west boundary. The committee would prefer that the location of the street not be within the conservation zone, although we have been informed that this is the only alternative. _ h%) I C O � H BVR`� G " 2 h 944 RES00%C I (802) 658-7956 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT, 05402 TO: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator FROM: Natural Resources Committee RE: RDR Enterprises, Inc., Lot I, Access Road Fill DATE: Monday, January 13, 1986 The Natural Resources Committee would like to express its concern for the potential for stream pollution from road salts and oil in road runoff which would increase as a result of increased traffic as well as for potential erosion patterns. We would be willing to approach Per. O'Brien in an effort to facilitate procurement of an alternate route for the site entrance. It is important to preserve this small area because of its importance to the wild life of the area. While inspecting the site several bird species as well as mammal sign was observed indicating that this is a haven used by the local fauna during the winter. The flora indicates that this is a wetland type area it should be protected because of the fragile nature of this type of environment this is why we have the CO zone. This site is also used by cross country skiers. The Natural Resources Committee feels that this is an area that should be preserved in as natural a state as possible. Because of the above the Natural Resources Committee would like to reserve the opportunity to reevaluate the site in the spring. NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address, and telephone # of applicant Name, address of property owner Property location and description I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay t e hearing 'lee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. \ Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line ---------------------------=----------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, C nference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on'»'�^^ Q—°' , 'd~4a4-4 /3el E, G , at a = (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: Appeal of seeking W from Section of the South OF Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to �..L li�i Qom,�r�,� ter °e.�,,.. G?2�,�• �, -.c -fie < iG �..�'fre�., /D �✓, o a o ,�� ..�,...�.�.�.. j'j..e /-�^. a.., �-���.:� .t..�-. e� ... c�.� // �1 r2,c..�,t.-,;a PRESENTATION PROCEEDURES FOR APPELLANTS TO THE SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The Zoning Board Adjustment is a quasi -Judicial body empowered to hear appeals to the Zoning regulations. These regulations have the force and —effect of law. It is the responsibility of you, the petitioner to present your documented arguments as to why the Board should grant a variance in your case. The Board has little discretionary power and each of the following five criteria must be met before the Board can grant a variance. Not one - three or four but all five of the following facts must be found by the Board before a variance can be ranted. Please come prepared to present all the facts necessary for the Board to make an objective and intelligent decision. (Refer to Sec. 4468 of the Planning and Development Act of 1969 for further clarification). 1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 2. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 3. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 4. That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 5. That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. l ©u� D�s u m rjj2c,)�� - 5�3bl— 'd P4* b,-,egk, i December 30, 1985 Mr. Alan D. Palmer 4050 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: zoning appeal Dear Mr. Palmer: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, January 13, 1986 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your zoning application. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp o 45 /lj", ��- : �/ -9iv LEGAL NOTICES 1 SO ZONING LNOTICEN In accordance with the South Burlinjgh^ton Zoning Regulations the CSouthr It 7 Title Burlington 4Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a ppuublic hearing 'I the South But- lington MuniciDorset Offices, Con- Str575 eeteSouth Burlington, Vermont on Monday, lanuory 13, 1986 at 5:00 P.M. to consider the following: NI. Appeal of Alan D. Palmer seeking approval, from Section 19.35, Filling with earth products and Section 19.65 Multiple uses Of the South Burlington Regulo- lions. Request is for permission to fill on area along Potash Brook to provide access from Kimball Avenue and construct two build- ings totaling 100,000 square feet on a lot containing 11.9 acres located on Kimball Avenue adjacent to Potash Brook and across from the Digital entrance. e2 Appeal of lames and Anne Washburn seeking a variance, from Section 18.00 Dimensional i requirements of the South But• lington Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 30'x68' single-family dwelling and parch to within thirty five yard, fat 8 Stanhope poach of the required front 03. Appeal of William L. Section seeking a variance, from 19.00, Non -conforming uses and structures, extension of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for ppermission to construct a 70'x76' addition to on existing structure which is non -conforming to use and dimensional require- ments, d.b.o. Herrington Broth- ers, 400 Patchen Road. Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer December 28, 1985 o ori n brothers agency, inc. July 17, 1984 Ms. Jane Bechtel City Planner City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Jane: Please withhold any further action on our application for site plan review on Lot #1 in Business Park North. Thank you for your consideration. DJO:bw Sincerely yours, O'BRIEN BROS. AGENCY,INC. Daniel J. O'Brien President tel. (802) 658-5000 williston rd. realtors 336 p.o. box 2184 multiple listing service so. burlington, vt. 05401-2184 /V,-� lie MV r1DA June 26, 1984 Mrs. Katherine Vose Agency of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont OS452 Dear Mrs. Vose: REDEJV ED MgNAGF:Gt'S C3rFI�ON CITY SO. Ett1RLtNG Enclosed please find seven copies of the amended application to the Lot #1, Industrial and Warehouse Use project to be constructed by O'Brien Brothers Realty. It is my understanding, that we need to amend the Act 250 application and develop additional information regarding Criteria #1, 1C, 1D, 4, 8 and 9F. Regarding the above criteria, we offer the following information. Criteria #1 - Air Pollution: It is our intent to develop additional parking for this project and therefore should not create any impact on the air pollution issue. Regarding the heating plant, we will be dealing with natural gas as a heat source which would not create anything offensive in reference to air pollution. Criteria #1C - Water Conservation: We intend to specify fixtures that would be of a low flow type, allowing a maximum of three gallons per flush. We will also provide flow constrictors in all faucets to restrict the flow of water in all locations. Criteria #lD - Floodways - Not Applicable V41E%IANN LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS • 289 COLLEGE Sr, • PLIRLINGTON, VERM()NT 11`-V)I • 802.864-0951_) Mrs. Katherine June 26, 1984 Page 2 Criteria 4 - Soil Erosion: Please note on the enclosed plan the soil erosion specifications and measures that will be taken to resist erosion and control sediment that might come from the construction site or permanent project after the facility is completed. Criteria 8 - Aesthetics and Landscaping: The enclosed plan indicates the landscaping that would be installed and the lighting layout is indicated on the plan with an attached cut of the fixtures. We are dealing with down lighting only and the light source would not be visible from any surrounding properties or the street. Regarding the building itself, we have enclosed copies of the eleva- tions of the structure, which indicate a simple brick structure. I believe the sketch speaks for itself in reference to the aesthetics. Criteria 9F - Energy Conservation: The structure we are planning will be designed to meet and exceed the ASHRAE 90-80 R value standards for new buildings, which would be as follows: Walls R=19 (.05 = U) Roof R=24 (.04 = U) Glass R=1.5 (.68 = U) As shown on the enclosed sketches, the building has one of its major exposures to the south, which allows us to take advantage of heat gain that would exists from a passive solar situation. It is our intent to use all thermal windows with double glazing to minimize the heat loss on the facility. Should you have any questions regarding this project, please call Dennis Webster or me so we can get this underway. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS, INC. James A. Lamphere JAL/cad Enclosures cc: Chittenden County Regional Planning w/enclosure South Burlington Board of Selectmen w/enclosure South Burlington Planning Commission w/enclosure ,Jlope, urtt I II,rll) s.l ,InI %-,t-W (of ovi" for w( illhel 1i(Ih1 nett !lilt)', 1.tai. d dolk I'lowt, finish GO `IGcmt I _ r with nine optional dvc( )r colors. . ..J 9" • liLFl l:C1OR Anndvcd for nu d atununum / 24.13cm reflector. •� I 1 I. . ?_50/�kouv HIGH PRESSUI • PROVLN FLECTIi1CAL SYSTEM — Electrical components ale isolated from the optical chamber to provide excellent heat control and long ballast life, high power factor ballasts are factory tested for reliable operation. • LISTING — UL listed suitable for wet locations. Effective Projected Area: Fixture: 1.7 sq. fit. (.16 sq. meters) Bracket:.6 sq. ft. (.06 sq. meters) 20 to 40 Ft. Mounting Initial Lumens 30,000/50,000 Lamp Life 24,000 Hrs. ORDERING INFORMATION The luminaire catalog number o_ uide below illustrates the variations available, and establishes the components to build a catalog number for ordering purposes. To use, select the wattage, mounting, voltage and options for your requirements — then transfer the designations to the appropriate blocks above. Accessories should be ordered as separate line items. TYPE — WEIGHT WATTAGE WATTAGE Ibs'kg DESIGNATIOl' 250 24 —10.91 250 S ❑ 400 39 —17.73 400 S ❑ MOUNTING DESIGNATION Square Pole SP-12 .J Round Pole RP-12 ❑ Wood Pole/Wall WW-12 .] OPTIONAL MOUNTING Mast Arm MA ACCESSORIES Tenon Mounting Sliptitter is ordered as separate line item. Important with this accessory, RP-12 mounting must be ordered on the fixtures. Tenon 1 2 2 3 3 4 Size fixture fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures at 180 at 9o, at 120' at 90' at 90' 2'..'O.D. 12.190 72 280 T2 29D T2.320 72.390 T2.490 2'.;-0.1). 13.190 13 280 13 290 13-320 T3.390 73.490 4 O.D 14.190 14 28D T4 290 14-320 T4-390 T4 49D NOTE: for mo,e details, see accessory sheet. VOLTAGE DESIGNATION 120 D 208 ❑ 240 ❑ 277 ❑ 480 OPTIONS SUFFIX DESCRIPTION —OF OuarterTurn Fasteners — HS House Side Shield —SF Single Fuse 1120 & 277 volts) — DF Double Fuse (20B, 240 & 480 volts —PER PE NEMA Twist -Lock PE Receptacle and Photocontrol for 120-240V —PER/PE7 NEMATwist-Lock PE Receptacle and Photocontrol for 277V —PER/PE4 NEMA Twist -Lock PE Receptacle and Photocontrol for 480V —PER NEMATwist-Lock PE Receptacle only. No Photocontrol — DCM I Decorative Color, Medium Bronv — DCS I Decorative Color, Sand Stone — DCB Decorative Color, Black (Semi -GI — DCC I Decorative Color, Capri Blue — DCA I Decorative Color, Aztec Tan — DCX I Decorative Color, Gar net —DCZ Decorative Color, Citation Gold — DCW Decorative Color, White — DCG Decorative Color, Gray 'Photocontrol shipped as separate item. NOTE: For more details, see option sheet. C �:. �:. Y" ` : . r�� fa`Y� . - __yam'"-T'..✓ - < �?� - Y. _ .�.� Y_ !, JOB NUMBER JOB NAME LOCAI ION APPROVAL STAMP ]i�a� 1t �'t.l �. _ .�-� ~��'�1��-�.:.�•. _.�'.. _ � '.. ��� ' 1 ..-i�<a.'. �'iSL'): _�S:f3...._U.:i�� Y ^.. t: �M'•.�:icY_^� ...►'.C'.: WISION l (♦tide,\tALI(a11ING j 12=-----3----- 24 92 480 405 :a0' F>HOTOMf-::-7�IC., ELrEVA-T-IC)Q - - � I L I(-i NT ; IxTU R-�E � BRI ��_ �LJ�LDINU moo. 6�i�UNG io�t, ���Mor� AreiL Ig84 e33G CIO t1i L.A Date A,--),alica`ion lctGeand Received . By, -- ----- _— By ------ - CITY OF SOUTH BURL FNGTON APPLIC'_%TZON FOR SITE PI. -AN RE'VI ,. 1) NA'•IB, . ADDRFS S, AND PHONE NUI-IB--R OF: (a) O-aner of Racord Daniel & Leo O'Brien 1336 Williston Road, South Burlington,-Vt. 05401 _ (b) Applicant - Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, -Inc_._ 289 College Street, Burlington, Vt. 05401 (c) Contact ?erson Jim Lamphere.___ 2) PROJECT STR �T DRESS Lot #1, Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 3) PROPOSED USE (S) Planned Business Development _ ') SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e of units, floor area, etc.) Single building _ (oy00 W of 13, sq. ft. with 14)-,-290 sq. ft. future addition 5) NUD.BE_R OF :-!PLOYEFS (full & part time) 12 phase I 6) COST ESTE ATES: 342,000.00 (a) Buildings (b) Landscaping (c) All Other Site Lmr-rove:ments (i.e., curb work) 35,000.00 7) EST -1ATED PROJECT COI•:PL�-rION DATE October 1, 1985 8) STIM-WED AVEP'1GE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 40 9) ?'y HOUR(S) OF OP —r-RANT ION 7 to 8 : 00 AM 4 to 5 : 00 PM 10) ? �K DAPS OF O?FR.=.TION Monday thru Friday June 14, 1984 DATL E' James . S IC-;.,T Wieman r- - -r ----- - - --- --- imphere for OF aphere Architects, Inc. � ` 114& f+�r ay' �I asUdr "�o'Ov \S,e - �k b 1 ua, ODD -a aaW a.% o �1 �e_ �j �1� — -� P - izQ&� 94&Q\(-\e 3 Jul 7 37 Lot +4 •�- Av�ck\ gam* � & &-C OeU < Dt)-k-CLC,j ro6cn\S June 26, 1984 Mrs. Katherine Vose Agency of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Dear Mrs. Vose: Enclosed please find seven copies of the amended application to the Lot #1, Industrial and Warehouse Use project to be constructed by O'Brien Brothers Realty. It is my understanding, that we need to amend the Act 250 application and develop additional information regarding Criteria #1, 1C, 1D, 4, 8 and 9F. Regarding the above criteria, we offer the following information. Criteria #1 - Air Pollution: It is our intent to develop additional parking for this project and therefore should not create any impact on the air pollution issue. Regarding the heating plant, we will be dealing with natural gas as a heat source which would not create anything offensive in reference to air pollution. Criteria #1C - Water Conservation: We intend to specify fixtures that would be of a low flow type, allowing a maximum of three gallons per flush. We will also provide flow constrictors in all faucets to restrict the flow of water in all locations. Criteria #11) - Floodways - Not Applicable WIL.^.!- N . LAMPHERE. APC, HITECTS • 289 COL. L FC;F `,I • BURLING TON, VERMONT 05-101 • 8f':' oi; i-�950 Mrs. Katherine � June 26, 1984 Page 2 Criteria 4 - Soil Erosion: Please note on the enclosed plan the soil erosion specifications and measures that will be taken to resist erosion and control sediment that might come from the construction site or permanent project after the facility is completed. Criteria 8 - Aesthetics and Landscaping: The enclosed plan indicates the landscaping that would be installed and the lighting layout is indicated on the plan with an attached cut of the fixtures. We are dealing with down lighting only and the light source would not be visible from any surrounding properties or the street. Regarding the building itself, we have enclosed copies of the eleva- tions of the structure, which indicate a simple brick structure. I believe the sketch speaks for itself in reference to the aesthetics. Criteria 9F - Energy Conservation: The structure we are planning will be designed to meet and exceed the ASHRAE 90-80 R value standards for new buildings, which would be as follows: Walls R=19 (.05 = U) Roof R=24 (.04 = U) Glass R=1.5 (.68 = U) As shown on the enclosed sketches, the building has one of its major exposures to the south, which allows us to take advantage of heat gain that would exists from a passive solar situation. It is our intent to use all thermal windows with double glazing to minimize the heat loss on the facility. Should you have any questions regarding this project, please call Dennis Webster or me so we can get this underway. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS, INC. James A. Lamphere JAL/cad Enclosures cc: Chittenden County Regional Planning w/enclosure South Burlington Board of Selectmen w/enclosure South Burlington Planning Commission w/enclosure �.h,tlrt•. niit r I;�rll1 !.l ,rn� 1••'I Ir' ' ((rl ni'rS {Or w( ,rlht•r litlhl urIcilrlly d d,uk hr(in7e finish with nuu optional (ir cl �r c nlors. • R[rt I C10R Anndilt•d for need aluminum refieclol • PHOV[ N [ L LC1 RICAL SYS1 EM — Electrical coltiponenis are it01a1ed from the optical chamber to provide excellent heat control and long ballast life, hi(Ili pnwer factor ballasts are factorytested for reliable operation. • LISTING — UL listed suitable for wet locations. 24' (r0'iGunl 24.13cm Effective Projected Area: Fixture: 1.7 sq. ft. (.16 sq. meters) Bracket:.6 sq. ft. (.06 sq. meters) 11 i. 250/400� HIGH PRESSUI SODIU 20 to 40 Ft. Mounting Initial Lumens 30,000/50,000 Lamp Life 24,000 Hrs. ORDERING INFORMATION The luminaire cataloq number ouide below illustrates the variations available, and establishes the components to build a catalog number for ordering purposes. To use, select the wattage, mounting, voltage and options for your requirements —then transfer the designations to the appropriate blocks above. Accessories should be ordered as separate line items. TYPE - WATTAGE 250 400 WEIGHT Ibs'kg 24 —10.91 39 —17.73 Square Pole Round Pole Wood Pole/Wall OPTIONAL MOUNTING Mast Arm MA ACCESSORIES Tenon Mounting Slipfitter is ordered as separate line item. Important with this accessory, RP-12 mounting must be ordered on the fixtures. Tenon 1 2 2 3 3 4 Size fixture fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures _ at 180 at 90' at 12(" at 90' at 90' 2?.-O.D. 12.190 72.280 T2 290 72-320 T2-390 T2.490 2'.:-O.D. 13 190 13 280 13 290 T3.320 T3 390 T3.490 4' O.D 14-190 74 280 T4-290 74.320 T4.390 T4.490 NOTE: rot mon• drtails, see accessory sheel JOB NUMBER JOB NAME LOCK] ION VOLTAGE DESIGNATION 120 D 208 ❑ 240 ❑ 277 ❑ 480 it OPTIONS SUFFIX DESCRIPTION —OF Ouarter Turn Fasteners — HS House Side Shield —SF Single Fuse 1120 & 277 volts) — DF Double Fuse (208. 240 & 480 volts —PER PE NEMA Twist -Lock PE Receptacle and Photocontrol for 120-240V —PERIPE7 NEMA Twist -Lock PE Receptacle and Photocontrol for 277V — PER/PE4 NEMA Twist -Lock PE Receptacle and Photocontrol for 480V —PER NEMATwist-Lock PE Receptacle only. No Photocontrol — DCM I Decorative Color, Medium Bronrn — DCS i Decorative Color, Sand Stone — DCB Decorative Color, Black (Semi -GI —DCC I Decorative Color, Capri Blue —DCA I Decorative Color, Aztec Tan —DCX I Decorative Color, Garnet —DCZ Decorative Color, Citation Gold — DCW I Decorative Color, White — DCG Decorative Color, Gray 'Photocontrol shipped as separate item. NOTE: For more details, see option sheet. APPROVAL STAMP `�.. �' ._.ter."�._ _r.�v -- .-}-���..�� a-. r'T •-Y�� ^...:s_-,.,�_ `_ f_.� 1_�.►.� . ai ••�.: ..L��~ al.::.: __.►.�-Z•-a._.'b� _ .♦. illI1, \IALIC.111ING 21q-; --- _ _ -- - -- - -- -, 4'00 W&Tr HP-5 24 4e' ro' PHoTorIEE , i� A I---L- F-'yAT) 0 Kj � I I I t l6gT FIYTU R,E 6t��LtA4To►�, �/�KMo�r( L_ J ajDO L-A a_m all. L. ,J t:r�n�rora. T►P� 1CD'-'.'3113 fo_ or.nit t_c ::,%o;-. C-0 tc. brj C0X,,-2.fj':ccj b tl�o L•_cr.ofor:co. _O.�i 1CL USL C,N-Ly .7Dto: L:.tto I::Lo?.vcu: . 20 P... CGi; 'rl •1'.�11 BY 1. APPIICAFT: Daniel & Leo O'Brien 1336 Williston Rd. So. Burl., V_t. 658 3500 % 2. j•P.OT•D'Y CSC ;� same ( PiIC:lU 110. 3. ? L�SG.J _..-. - +� t=r CG:(1':.�.'! 7 JiRC1L 1[t. > silti,irili�na (C•�;.;`�7.CtC cnl.v Z� C1f�C' .ia: lii n it l James Lamphere, Wiemann-Lamphere, 289 College St., Burl., Vt._05401 864 0950 �. :+;"7ri. IS !OMI IE-CULL Itv IZ.ST T.iJ THIS Owner - fee simple 5. IF !'?U Tin:, 1jOT F_uzr;v .ITS TLPIT.iJ a :o r_ Jii�;�', CGi L^r L:" i•� THE 2 OLIIJ.1 IG : Partnership -1958 VT Mcgal Entity) (�;:to CbJ:.'.t3ci) (Stato) (Dato Rcgi vtarcd in vt. ) 6. 17:1-- IS TIM 1'T�:TUs,.�. O.^ TizTG TuQUC-Si° ^a-' r O 11..:1 1.1; ` Develop additional information regarding Criteria 1 1C 1D 4 8 and 9F 7. LiESCitID,; ,1:JY CFIAhr•..S ?t TIE g r •� r,-.. � 1 lI 0 �LX,;.NG 7.:.,r:� n. �lcreacre =n t o :�ti • ��„h :• C_..... ��'li r�i a,�, Q a:GTiilt 11: Pi�1C� h c ro .:_ � „ � c l nnC 33. 65 b. Acrcage in this project _ 3.4 -___'- -' c. Date the project ti•;il? L^ u;:a=;;c;c1`-Upon approva'Tl-- =UY'3T4 -- d. Date the project will La co:rr 9Gteu November 1, 1984 o. %Ineing er bonding o: i:'r,is project Partnership funds`-- i. Municipal sc;:vicco to bo vaCd— Police, fire, road, water -�� �I iIi - TlD01iIOi L TNiOZi;ZT!.O:a !`,ril.1:F1 E ^, � • �S'Z'�1� - ?• tL� l .l hereby agree L. o CCil�1? rt C) 1 I�i:1 4 10'jC^� %. c�.i L. G'' forth 1TI n7pi] Cw tlO of rac'i. and LOnclxz ions Of L:.:: i:rirl tho L-ant U a Per.al.i. nunimor w, % as amon:'cu a~avc : sP 5_' R07,%: I hereby agreo :.o t:ho ira:,ofer forth db �vo ; of i,r:,"a Lcc i=ernit d� ---- — -- es oe' N IV Iv7r1 �� 11L1CJ rh� - .'.L'L BE C ;-, 'L:,�iL• D YjY ------- -- ---- 7SLL 7�Pj3Ll•C[: _ 5 1':7it. p.0 T- ,��— 0. _hi _ -icaion nnt ).c cicjr,c.i h;► t` o C-.l.pi. _c��it, .; , i;ning thio --Inor -•.• arwol��e3 P.ct ''S0, cani�.r J ,A, J f t'zo rroL_.0^c1 ancl, �.;^ t"1C H123 Cci; nla.. ; C.......,1. li.. ng Cc-,.:,ic: icn c^��.icc.Llc�n t;;c tithe:: the 11/3/75 Si anitiirP n-r Annl i rant ' 1.'..�.i�,��l` 1��� i`L+ , ��1,,•J L'Jl.. ( _�i�'i% � 1� fL.�11.�:,t_j�•� Voc thin a=m J all Uzo P or. -.A.; .�: o^c; ;,c...� ir._ ? uding -,- � tiL• tra:nof-ora. App icat!-On7 fol.- ` O►•11'� t=C::��0�'. ► "C/ tL bu Ca m 1�1: CC� by t110 t_cr,3far.co. )N 1 - i \i:: 07 ICL•' USi': CI:rZ1' r•:.t:a Iklt'OlVC(i: D30:,oc1 C--l.m-Act.c'-o • a- V f : 'i0 P..L' CG:d�'£.'.:1'-'L1 13Y .J 1. P.PPLICXT: Daniel 4 Leo O'Brien 1336 Williston Rd. So. Burl. , Vt. 658 3500 (PilCnu I;o. 2.. PIRLO C- 7-1Y 0,, ;i same � ---- ^^ ) F:dc�: c,,,,) f P: torso 3• �.taUL'a i0 L-^i CG:al��.^Il TaROLT, l7as iG1�PiaCtti_n:� (C'=•.-•_ .C'.:D C:3',.k, 2= L1i�C': �i'a t•i:al irl) i James Lamphere, Wiema_nn-Lamphere, 289 College St., Burl., Vt._05401 864 0950 4. :�ti�'1T .1S lOuZ Ir r ,.••, .• -, --�., , (==c'°�,cc:,) (F:zone T•;o. ) • .G.�7. il'�Lc2;.,1 T.�a ZiI2S P:�O?,r.�Y? Owner - fee simple 5. iF YOU FiI::; I:OT r=iI2;^, ITS F�Pt=IC .'It7:: Pz 1.;1 Partnership 1958 _ VT (Lr=gad Entity) O:.to t'c,::1od) Mato) (Dato in Vt.) 6. i:':i 1S 'AM 1'^:iIT .T, O 7'i:3S RMI -- Sr r, O 71.:E;,7 itsTHE . _ Develop additional information regarding Criteria 1 1C 1D 4 8 and 9F r i. UiSCIt�,i r1:3Y CfL'�IC.ry".S ?IJ Tiw _r. �r •� r,-...., ., ; ,� \G l..ut':J L...f�:.7^IVi1 ni a. Aczeac,,re in tho cntire t �t e 9 •and 33.65 b. .Acreage in this project y "" 3-.41-- c. Date the project %.,ill Lc a_+ ::�p`�' hT��ujy--IWf -- .: on appro'v y d. Date the project Will Ls ca:rr�-cteu November 1 1984 c. i�rding cr bomling of- th- Project '-2erLsh .-- is �o-cct Partnership funds f. I•'rtniciral SC;:viCCs to bo Lscd p olice, e fire, road, water iV iIY - rwDiTIOI:r1I, 1lyi 0Z; L T?.OIL+`,CrO:; �• 'l:Zil.__% 6tL�1 .l hclCbY aj1CC i:0 C01-.10,. th?:J �1'a,jC^�. Z'.i G•^._i: io_'th in 'ihC i.?pIiCa^.ti0 Of Fact CI -Id C0- cIx2'•-4.oriS 02 L-=., and t:10 L-nnd Li;o Pe;r..li1- nllPitbci .:.nd no 9. Tit�3:5 P.t`t0ic: C increbY a rco ::o tho L o.ni �er of j_L u Loco i'cr,;ti:: 4) as oe•_ forth-- I4 IV -- ta�rrlc.: i� , L1:'CLS - ..r �-`i:vT1.7� C�7: �_or) 'l0 1; cl i, 1.,'_.1L' I) b1 T�7�L F,i�1'i.i•Ci:�;� -+p.C,.V 250 10• '=1110 an, 71iCCii 1OT1 GIUSt )?C �lc�;�C,, �)�► t ba i.Ppj.?.C";'et. : ign_ng- tllio an-- .1CC•i l 011 t iiC a-P')i'-C1nt 03S-O-MCS ':C3n0n 1 j l '<�•, Yy. � a:1i'OI!!C '� .,S - 9 b �,.,, t to 1:1?:Oi•�.u� C;: r::_ry C:cd %rt:l, }:iiC:• the %['Cali 3 [ o, Cv:l?'?.i,- ; \'i:ili 1* -,.3 t lil"i a .'. C CC�1.�n P �..nliing C '-As-7iG;l C� d RCS-'10:.: - • 11/ 3/75 ii anatttrP of A»nl i rant a Co- 4. WIEMANN LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS 289 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 PHONE (802) 864-0950 FF ._ IFAWAM ♦ /. �if►Iioi' !r .� W,..4.0 �► t Gentlemen: Date a'd ""7 Project No. Project A.+�C_��1" ��� /i� 7// We are sending you the following items herewith under separate cover Items transmitted as follows: Items sent by: Approved ❑ Approved as noted Not approved ❑ Resubmit for approval Furnish corrected copies For your files 1-1 Our messenger Your messenger .At class mail WIEMANN—LAMPHERE 2500 QCP 284 By: o ori n orotr rs agency, inc. July 17, 1984 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Dick: Please withhold any further action on our application for a mixed use variance on Lot #1 in Business Park North. Sincerely yours, O'BR N BROS. AGENCY,INC. Daniel J. O'Brien President DJO:bw tel. (802) 658-5000 williston rd. realtors 336 p.o. box 2184 multiple listing service so. burlington, vt. 05401-2184 To 1 � WIEMANN LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS 289 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PHONE (802) 864-0950 Mr. Richard Ward City of South Burlington Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Gentlemen: Date June 27, 1984 Project No Project Business Park North We are sending you the following items herewith under separate cover 8260 No. Description Remarks 5 site plan 1 notice of appeal/fee $30.00 1 revised site plan review application Items transmitted as follows: ❑ Approved ❑ Approved as noted Not approved ❑ Resubmit for approval Furnish corrected copies For your files Items sent by: ILI Our messenger Your messenger class mail WIEMANN—LAMPHERE 1500 QCP 883 By: r i __. _. 1) Doi C'C,'1�?1; ';t u1;: IZ-:CeIVca • BY ---- ------ Dy ------ CI`i'Y Or SOUTH EUr'ZljTN1GTON Al>PI,I(:_=-$TTON FOR SITE PI Its REVIi:;-. NA -ME, A7?_)Rr.SS, AMID PRONE NUM-6ER OF: (a) C,Yner of cord Daniel & Leo O'Brien 1336 Williston_ Road, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 (b) Applicant Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 289 College Street, Burlington, Vt. 05401 (c) Contact Person Jim Lamphere - 2) :'ROj FCT S`_T'R:,ET ADDRESS Lot #1, Kimball Avenue. South BUrlington, Vt. 05401 _ 3) DRO?OS�,-:D US(S) _ __Planned Business Development 4) SIZE Or DROJT (i_e_, = o= units, door area, etc.) Single building of 6,400 sq. ft. with 10,200 sq. ft. future addition 5) N IR-1-BER OF r.:•'_PLOYEE_S ('full & ua rt time) 12 phase I 6) COST ESTIi•LAT ES: (a) Dili loincs 171,000.00 (b) Lancscaoinc (c) all Other Site I.mrrovements (i.e., curb „ork) 35,000.00 7) STE-1ATED PROj Lx_—I' CO:•a:�Li:-rION DATE October 1, 1985 9) FSTI;_1,TZ1:D AVER -AGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 629 9) ? !_ti :OUR(S) OF OP _�',T ION 7 to 8 : 00 AM 4 to S : 00 PM 10) DAYS OF O?-raATIOi1 Monday thru Friday Jtinc 14, 1984 James A. L mphere for Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant Daniel & Leo O'Brien 4e '46 6 �7 1336 Williston Road, So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 (658 5000) Name, address of property owner same as above Property location and description Business Park North, located off Kennedy Drive, Williston Road and Industrial Avenue in South Burlington, Vermont I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. el Hearing Date Signature f Appel ant Do not write below this line --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, onference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on . ;r - , , � , at U �,, . (day of weely' (m th and date) t e to consider the following: y� g Appeal of /(Y Li,•1tt. ,,,i,�`t�..t,� /� �41 seeking a from Section G .� of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to ,moo, a•� --�%� _ �'�' � p��,,. ,�, SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday , J1j1y 23, 1984 at 5,00 P _ M _ (day of week) month and date) time to consider the following: #1 Appeal of Daniel and Leo O'Brien seeking A approval , from Section 19 . 65 1 Mu 1 i pl e uses, suh sect -ion 19.652 of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 16,600 square foot building on a lot containing 3.4 acres and occupy said building with multiple industrial uses, at lot #1, Business Park North, Kimball Avenue.