Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0020 0022 Kimball AvenueMinor Lot Line Adjustment Application Supplement (1) Alan Palmer Section 8b The intent is to transfer the property to a common interest community (to be known as Kimball Commons) with separate footprint lots. One footprint lot will contain the southernmost building and will be comprised of general and medical offices (20 Kimball Avenue) One footprint lot will contain the northernmost building and will be subjected to a condominium regime containing nine (9) residential condominium units. To be called (The Lofts at 22 Kimball Commons) the remaining land will be owned by Kimball Commons Owners Association Inc.) Section 10 The property will be subjected to a common interest community containing footprint lots (containing the existing buildings) with the remaining land to be owned by Kimball Commons Owners Association Inc. and will be subject to the governing documents, which will contain all the easements and covenants. The footprint lots containing the buildings on the property may be further subject to a common interest community. I hereby certify that all the information re uested as p fthis application has been submitted and is t accurate to the best of my knowledge. � C SI ATURE PIjLICANT WOO.. - SIGNATURE OF PRQKRTY OWNER #1 Or Pn SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY' OWNER #2 Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this application and find it to be: omplete inistrative Officer -7t Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 8 79-56 76 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Minor Lot Line Adjustment Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 south _ PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number AD-IV-0 (offim use oulD APPLICATION FOR MINOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review by the Administrative Officer. 1) (Name as shown on 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #) V,6 3) APPLICANT (dame, inail�ng address, phone ago fax fax #) 4) APPLICANT'S, LEGAL INTERF{ST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) 5) CONTACT PXIKSON (Nanje, mailing address, phone and fax #) 5a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS QC, 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) p b 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Exist* g Uses on Property (inclu i ' cription and size of each separat use b) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above note if Overlay Districts are applicable) I!�k,_ �&& g 4 .l iL, Cif . , .c>, ,� t n RK please 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 9) LOT COVERAGES FOR EACH LOT LOT #1 (Street Address): a) Building: Existing__ �___ % Proposed b) Overall (building, p, outside storage, etc) Existing(n Proposed _% c) Front yard along each street Existing - - 0/6 Proposed j _% ✓ �� �� (applies only to commercial property) LOT #2 (Street Address): d) Building: Existing % Proposed % e) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % f) Front yard along each street Existing % Proposed % (applies only to commercial property) l 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPD EN�RANCE'S.ON P PERT covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) .�?i,�,G 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) 13) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the Land Development Regulations. Three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. Applicant fees must be included. Minor Lot Line Adjustment Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 5,lingtonAt Aiport \ t� 1 Lao 1 EldredgNl4 Cam I1 to �' n / //� r -. ✓ �fi��t J BRO�.OP (i 6�y 4 o and :aaMuanr goil, Location Plan scale: 1 - 2000 feet i This Common Interest Community Plan /a one of two sheets. Both sheets are required to meet the requirements of Vemront 27A V.S.A. section 2.109 (Vemwnt common Interest ownership Act) . Therefore, neither sheet can stand-alone. Both must be used in unison to make this Plat valid. BENCH - PAMLION SCULPTURE — BENCH TYPICAL -- PLANTINGS EASTERN AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC (COMMUNITY BANK) 883/253 N/F #275 Kennedy Drive Parcel ID 0970-00275 1" iron pipe with plastic yellow cap found buried 8" Plan References and Survey Notes SBRC PROPERTIES, LLC 11. lnw PUT has been compiled from Reid 1116/033 su-i and record Videvres Mduaft the Wowing dreummts. N/F .l- L 'nNAL PUN, Bu.a - Panr North. #1877 Williston Road 1-1 /4" iron pipe South Bursa gton-, prepared by Ciro found up 10" Engineafilg Asscc/vtm doted Aug 1978. Parcel ID 1810S1877 _ _ last mWwd 1-24-80, recorded m sane T" E 288.7( —� �� �' /21272 of are City of South Burlington ��_�w� �� 'C�-"'u--"- - - existing 15 pedestrian Lmd Rernrda Al. IAWerty Survey Far woods easement _ ConaMrct/on Company; Mc, South STAIRS _______--------- - Bulrington, VT; prepped by Horvell _ ------- �7 A -latex Mo, not doted, recorded m CE 1 Apr9 41968 and recorded an slide 895 1 o/ a Recants. of South Sunhgton Land D dumpster w/ C, ALTA / ACSW LAND 77U INSURANCE screen fence SURVEY For Alan D. Palmer S 5424'0V E 72.10' Of O/Bce Budding Located at 20 Kimball —a Avenue, South Burlington, Vemont , Sheets I of 2 and 2 of 2 dated Nor. 1990, W 1 1 3 1 prepared by Vermont Lond Surwyers and 1 proHded by am Pdmer. {9 $ 1 s u 1 1 D. Site Plop, 20 Kimball Avenua 20 1 o Q.a Kimbell Avenue. South Burlington, lAm-t". t7 1 � VI 1 of doted Oct. "A 2017, prepared by Nichoof lilt Dugm, Architect and pr-fald by Alm Z N Palmp L J 1 3 Z Nor" orientation is based an s-oy 9raW STATIC GPS obse atl- made an The Lofts at 1— — CONDOMINIUM a 0310912016 and processed .0g nimble 1 BOUNDARY m Business Cent r. The readtant honrantal N 22 Commons l dotum w NAo 83 This redim0on is called MAD 8X2011) epoch 2010.0. Geold mode' w1 Parcel ID 80 000 0 ' 1 `0 (ceoldr2o). 7h. r-dt*V orth-Irk height t i. NAM 88 (geoid;?a). �°1 6,2 S.F. 1 Vermont Common Interest Tobac ,14 1 tt on Act ti 7z cur ing c' l 27A VSA Section 2•109 Disclosures and Comments 10 03' KIIVIBALL PARTNERS, LLC 8) C rt �` d --Vfy to ON, best of my knaH.dge. 64.72 IN54.2421 • W i 757/342 ml. 2 SHEET PUT -take site W—tbn 3 rwprYed by 27A Y.SA. S.ct/an 2-119 N/F (Vermont Camman Interest Ownerahja Act) as �20 Kimball Avenue 66,211 S.F. l #30 Kimball Avenue depktd her.p limited n note to ^)' 1.52 Acres Parcel ID 0980-00030 . 1Th � 1. The comman ine.re:t carmmun/ty 4 names Parcel ID 0980-00020 N 1 '--: 7h. antis comman Waxit community I. shoer hereon. 9.311 S.F. 1 Z Comm. Land 1. subject to Dewil foment 0.21 Acres Rights ,y A S. not. 2 b.- see Schedule A, Or of 0p3 the Deeiararbn. see sit p s of 2T m 4. ;hero ors nil Heb/s Pae+@I� r I Ide croaMments by s an the an /nt-irt �h 95 community expt shown heroan. gas Do- 9A 51.21' 1 N 54'20W W l 25.79' electric on ` N 54°20'52' W concrete pad CE Si ewalk 1 Lf-E LNnited Camman Element w ' ce 1 CE Common Bement 4 wot r elec. l� jjj'{BB Need Not Be BuAt s _ se MBB Moat Be Bran KIMBALL AVENUE List of Symbols & Abbreviations SURVEYED property Ilne (Certifed) Approximate property line (NOT certlh.d) O'BRIEN BROTHERS, LLC Slderm. of eA.tinq .asement 896/258 -per- catch t-in and drain line N/F —$- - Light pole and underground line #25 Kimball Avenue Iron pipe / rebar found Parcel ID 0980-00055 Q survey control points lnformatim shown on this Commm Interest Community Plan is a faithful portrayal of circumstances pertinent to the subject �� I property A collaboration of Held, pord and pertinent record evidence was used in the `t. ...^'" `I� analysis of boundary conclusions shown ; O heroin. This plan complies with the LEONARD -30 O 15 30 60 120 requirements of Vemnoint Statute Title 27A yrH V.SA. S ction 2-109 (Vermont Common it AMBLO *' inters wnfp�c, to the best of myGRAPHICSCALE 1IrKR=3ofBar knowm Nil: sssA4 onord H. Ambl L.S.VT ge95 Date City - 00W2018 ^"'^' Chengedpace/numLwaMiabe/ofMe COBS TATE &3,p18 REVISION Ld areas/geirera/revisions/b'Be bock/labs/s/tlin )at. of SURVEY Q RECORD DRAw7NG N PRELIMINARY 0221118 Q FINAL E3 SKETCHICONCEPT WRVEYORS... Bllttoll MJS/✓FP - Professional )RAW JET/LHA Land Surveyors, PC :NECKED Closure a 20 gmtrell Ave. 1 Lake Street LHA 9 sub 102 SLbane, VT ,CALF South 05478 i. seingtal 524A555 1" = 30 FEET VT 06003 ,-800.57POBB5 8M-863-1812 .b ple.aam © M. Mot-& J. Capylghtsd Kimball Commons 18 Planned Community SOUB0257 FILE CONDO Current Deed & Plan of Record: PLAN SHEET / Volume 171, Page 444 Lot #6 Slide 127.2 1 of 1 20 & 22 Kimball Avenue South Burlington, VT 1 I 1 I � I i I D I I I I MYD.IGN W/EICNICTA61.E -'. warDACDlmmElNAI'ALUTwn — 003GYI6DLBd(H MANTM AREAS NIF MERCHANTS BANK/ COMMUNITY BANK WE MUNSON PROPERTY �s reBLanaAN B+n rAaaxENr / AND TO L'OMPD5FLE BENCH 6TAIRe K FBI'YIAN IAPATHENWIC. AR\E/A �) 1YA1A[WAa' DUeRSiAR LNd.ON1R6 1/891=1E-0" LARGE ISMILDER BASE II'-r^ X f -T WIND SCULP'RTRE PRESSOA6TREATED WOOD STAIRS W/ I Itr DIA. HANDRAILS PLANTING LIST PREPARED BY SHANNON R. PALMER 103 PR Name UgM N-N FORM SHE. PRIGS DTY 1. 1... VWMram penlaWm SIxJPar1, OMAL 1-0'NE 'SoN Al—. ' Shade SCREEN/ r4 MAQ 7 BORDER SpDM 2 sp— p—W. is Sun ( UPRMNi 64V. Betl+1 VM S*ea OVAL -S'r 317.M x 7Newssavx.<'a'Plena' SPECMIEN Spw OvAo bd«a _.. Sun TREE 60ee1 I MetleMarc Troe' Tres S325M 2 e Mapa Tree Sun SPECMEN 6' TM Or Merin TREC 3TJp 2 i IAbWnee (IMv41' 5 Bee bleehpre SAYPM R01*11 2'l 1, eaY 'N'e Gamel Shade SPECIMEN 3' ' f13.00 9 Spread B WmenNiis Vemau Suva SUCKERING 6'-10' YertW WYCMuael Shade SPECIMEN TMa 522M 2 6.12' SaeW i �— I "/ AMopupftybs FUA a PaeA GROUND Gruatl fMarDenY1 "aasaeecw.ee Sun COVER Gax Eyrpee 312 A0 l5 ZONE: C 1 -LR2 COMMERCIAL 1- LIMITED RETAIL LOT AREA: 1.9 ACRES - 82,764 SF LOT COVERAGE COMMON R.O.W. 7,200 SF &6% - BUILDING FOOTPRINT 11,000 SF 17.0% DRIVES+PARKING 39,794SF 4&0% I GREEN SPACE 21,6" SF 26.2 h EXISTING PARKING \ 143 SPACES II\\ 1 PROPOSED PARKING 132 SPACES Trip Generation Calculation 20 Kimball Avenue SD-17-26 Calculated by: Marla Keene SP-05-61 approved 50.04 vehicle trip ends for the subject property Calculations use updated values from the 10th edition ITE trip generation manual Land Use Land Use Code PM Peak Trip Ends General office 710 1.15 Medical office 720 3.46 Apartment (multi -family low rise) 220 0.56 Calculated on: 11/8/2017 per unit # units VTE 1000 sf 17.531 20.16 1000 sf 11.400 39.44 dwelling unit 9 5.04 Total VTE's 64.64 Additional VTE's 14.60 theOther Paper • otherpapervt.com November 2, 2017 19 Arl Pubfic Notices dolls, I have many for sale. 802 -734- STEREO: Vintage, Bang & Olufsen 3713. (11/02) 5000, master control, phono, ra- 2002 Suzuki Aerio SX, only dio, tape, plus 2 Redline speakers, PUBLIC HEARING niles, 5-speed, AWD, very FURNITURE: Brass headboard, full reasonable price, 802-951-2453. SOUTH BURLINGTON ,vell maintained, runs great, size, $75. 802-734-5818. (10/26) (11/02) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW nt in snow, $2,000. 802-863- BOARD t0/26) PIANO: Yamaha, upright, beauti- ful, like new, $2,000. 802-497-2527. The South Burlington Girl (10/26) Devel- -URNITURE: American opment ReviewBoard will hold im including bed, bedding, a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Confer- ;tand, lamp, pajamas, and ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, .dorable and perfect for the rs. $100. If interested in AG South Burlington, Vermont on A 6_0 Tuesday November 21, 2017 L t- following: at 7:00 P.M. to consider the rl Preliminary and final plat application #SD-17-26 of hicles Expected! Alan Palmer for a planned unit development to amend a previously approved plan for a 39,375 sq. ft. medical auction.hibid.com and general office building. C-ts The amendment consists of converting 10,444 sq. ft. of 4 @ 9AM Champlain Community Services, Inc. general office use to nine (9) n 7:30AM two -bedroom dwelling units, Iliston, VT and redistributing the uses CCS is an intimate, person centered developmental service in the south section of the ebuilding such that 11,400 sq. providr with a strong emphasis on employee and consumer AAt� i I ft. are medical offices and satisfaction. We would love to have you as par oftheteam. the remaining 17,531 sq. ft. are general office, 20 Kimball Avenue. Direct Support Professional Final plat application #SD- 17-28 of JAM Golf, LLC to 1 '07 Ford Five Hundred Champlain Community Services is looking for compassionate subdivide a 47.99 acre parcel '07 Pontiac G5 developed with a golf course d '06 Audi A6 individuals to provide one on one support to help people realize into eleven (11) lots ranging '06 BMW 3 Series dreams and reach their goals. We are currently offering a variety in size from 0.37 acres to 45.03 '06 Chevy 1500 of positions that include a comprehensive benefit package, acres, Golf Course Road. '06 Chevy TrailBlazer Bill Miller, Chair '06 Chrysler Pacifica competitive wage and a supportive work environment. This is an South Burlington Develop- '06 Dodge Dakota excellent job for applicants entering human services or for those ment Review Board '06 Ford Fusion looking to continue their work in this field '06 Nissan Murano A copy of the application is '06 Subaru Legacy available for public inspection '06 Toyota Tacoma Send your application and cover letter to Karen Ciechanowicz at at the South Burlington City 05 Chevy TrailBlazer staff@ccs-vt.org EOE Hall. Participation in the local AND MORE proceeding is a prerequisite Subject to Change to the right to take any subse- quent appeal. all the cars! Building a community where everyone participates November 2, 2017 and everyone belongs. N_i� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 25 day of october , 20 17, a copy of the foregoing public notice for perliminary and fint[type of application] # sd-17-26 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) kimball partners Ilc 30 kimball avenue, south burlington, vermont 05403 obrien homefarm Ilc 1855 williston road, south burlington, vermont 05403 south burlington realty Ilc 85 shunpike road, williston, vermont 05495 eastern avenue propertiesie 222 hasting hill # 102, st johnsbury, vermont 05819-111 Dated at shelburne [town/city], Vermont, this 25 day of october , 2017 Printed Name: alas d palmer Phone number and email: 802-598-9657 paimercompanyltd@gmail.com Signature: - lit - 644 it Date: ac:tober 251 2017 Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 AT- tD PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD- i --� - Z.Cp (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW �] Preliminary LIFinal PUD Being Requested?]Yes ❑No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) hal 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) '/P .. I 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) �a one 4. CONTACT PERSON phone and fax #) a. Contact email address: c i --, e (Q fr,04r I I I Ly) 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) + Cb r t4b - (?957 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): b. Existing Uses _n Property (including description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Use! y property (i remain): each new use ZM q d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and,m�zzanine):_ E, A _ ja ':� -1 f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of emp yq s xisting and propose, notes office vo(suspon-office employees) h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): J4, K6 not specifically requested above, i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. _i a / 2 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be�rovided here, even if no change is proposed) �45 a. Size of Parcel: i ,�'�j ,, (acres /sq. ft.) b. Building Coverage: ' Existing 1 91� square feet % Proposed `SJM ','t:!�,> square feet c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing square feet 49 % Propose square feet % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed square feet % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? ❑ Yes V No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: Mtz> SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 1 J b. Landscaping: $ LV (Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): G iya 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: - 16. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledg . �J J � IGNATURE OF APPLICANT P /"4,/-xwk2- TURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 10J1(CJ2Vn I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: i Complete ❑Incomplete l-1 Administrative The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer RE: 20 Kimball Avenue October 16, 2017 Change of use Dear Ray Belair I am requesting a use change for a section of this building that was built for Digital Equipment in 1981 as an office. (North Section consisting of a 61' x 82' two stories with open parking under.) This site is in a convent location, and as the market for office use is winding down, the intemet has the ability for people to work from home or anywhere in the world. There is a fiber optic network set up in the building, it is in walking distance to Burlington International Airport. The City has developed open area's (parks) close by, Great for walking and biking. Also is on the Chittenden County Bus route. There is greater demand for medical facilities, and this building is completely ADA compliant at all levels. There for the request to increase the medical space available. I would like to convert the north section into 9 loft type apartments, ranging from 700 sf to 1000sf, With Storage units (Existing now in room 109) approx 60 sf each The parking area under this portion of building will be for the tenants parking .Terry Francis Assistant Fire Chief, said it should be sprinkled, since people will be sleeping above. The FAA has approved an elevation of 375.00, this will allow for roof solar panels. There is enough area on the roof for a 100 kw solar array, this should generate about %2 the electrical usage for this building per year. At the North, West corner of the existing parking (a new area will be set aside) for the residential tenants and there outside activities. Picnics, barbecues, raised bed gardens, etc. As depicted on the site plan, by removing 4 parking spaces to accommodate this new 1200 sf green area and covered picnic table along with an enhanced walking path from the building to the new recreation area. (Sun most of the day here). Enclosed a cost sheet. There is a demand for this type of housing and medical use, and my hopes are to have this Project set for 2018-2019? After an inspection of the Building front, there was considerable Stucco damage, this was do to the existing Cedar Tree holding the moisture in the Stucco, causing it to crack and fall off. We had to remove the 8" dia tree. Enclosed is the estimate to replace the tree, $ 1,836.83 average value to replace, from Drinkwater Nursery, & Gardner Supply. We would like to replace the tree with Kinetic Wind Sculptures; enclosed is the Concept Rendering and Layout. The cost of the Sculptures will be $11,700.00 Will the Board accept the Wind Sculptures in place of planting a new tree? Google Maps /-6 Kimball Ave K= m L-",i z,w 4, *'Vq. 7 Imagery C2017 Google, Map data @2017 Google 1001 lass l�,ll LLL a5463 dm�3 05��5 Table 3 Parking Occupancy Rates Residential 60% 100% 100% 80% 100% 100% Office/ Warehouse 100% /Industrial 20% 5% 5% 5% 5% Commercial 90% 80% 5% 100% 70% 5% Hotel 70% 100% 100% 70% 100% 100% Restaurant 70% 100% 10% 70% 100% 20% Movie Theater 40% 80% 10% 80% 100% 10% Entertainment 40% 100% 10% 80% 100% 50% Conference/Convention 100% 100% 5% 100% 100% 5% Institutional (non- 100% church) 20% 5% 10% 10% 5% Institutional (church) 10% 5% 5% 100% 50% 5% This table defines the pert nt of the bal is minimum, needed duri g each time period for thared parking. (M-F - Monday to Friday) R C1Y, ell V , �rrru��. 13 � 14-ih a� ,�4 a4 d I� 45 Z5 45' d5 i 4 lA� l AlI T D P ,' Institute for Transportation & Development Policy What is shared parking? shared parking itdp.org Parking demands, like other transport demand patterns, operate on a peak and off-peak schedule depending on related land use. Distinct but complementary patterns, such as "office parking" that is generally empty in the evenings and on weekends and "residential parking" that is generally fuller in the evenings, offer an opportunity for cities to better satisfy residents and commuters without increasing supply. Shared parking is a land use/development strategy that optimizes parking capac- ity by allowing complementary land uses to share spaces, rather than producing separate spaces for separate uses. In effect, shared parking makes spaces publically accessible rather than reserved for a par- ticular tenant or property owner. It may be privately constructed and operated, depending on a contractual agreement, but should remain within the government's jurisdiction for long-term transport planning purposes. Often, regulations require the creation of a predetermined amount of parking space for each type of land use. 11iis results in an overabundance of parking, as far more spaces are created than are demanded at any given moment. The excess of parking induces more driving while also leaving many spaces underused. It further inhibits the possibility to design more compact developments and neigh- borhoods with active uses. Shared parking goes hand -in -glove with mixed use, compact development. Shared parking unlocks the potential for higher development densities around transit and acts as a control mechanism against urban sprawl. By allowing adjacent property owners to share parking spaces, cities can accommodate essential parking demands like disabled parking, emergency vehicles and freight delivery while promoting travel by more sustainable modes with better land use integra- tion. For example, parking developed for a cinema can be shared with office workers and nearby residents, since each use's parking demands are heaviest at different hours. Shared parking can reduce parking requirements by 20-40%, creating positive economic, social and environmental benefits.` According to the Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 60-80 parking spac- es can be shared among 100 employees in the North American context. The mixed -use Circle Centre in the city of Indianapolis was able to reduce the provision of parking by 53% from the standard regulations by using a shared parking approach. That also amounted to a savings of $10,000 USD per space to the developers. continued on P. 2 100% 90% 80% 70% 6o% School 50% Shopping Center 40% Residents 30% Offices 20% 10% 0% Weekday Evening Weekend The table illustrates how ioo parking spaces in a mixed use district can be distributed based on usage at different times. ,How dries shared parkiing work? For a city to reap the full benefits of a shared parking program, parking needs to be publically accessible with no private, reserved spaces. If all parking is publically accessible then it can be traded as a commodity. This also requires eliminating free parking. The government can act as an intermediary in helping the private sector identify how and where the spaces can be shared in existing neighborhoods, especially during the transition toward making all parking publically accessible. For expanding city districts, shared parking can exist for essential uses or as a regional - wide transition toward sustainable transport. Government might handle contracts for public parking to assure satisfying performance indicators such as occupancy rate, mode shift and funds raised for neighborhood improvement projects as street use and capacity issues change. Parking provision and restriction is an important part of transport planning. To successfully implement shared parking, a review should be conducted that looks at local zoning ordinances, existing use of parking space use at varying times of the day, and the existing parking manage- ment strategy. The city should have an idea of the mode split it wants to support. Designing for shared parking is an iterative strategy, and should be revisited every few years. The process should shift the city away from trying to satisfy all parking demands by increasing parking supply. Shared parking is most effective when done in conjunction with promotion of public transport use, walk- ing and cycling. Shared parking spaces must be conveniently located and easily accessible by all relevant users. In other words, it creates the possibility to shift away from planning merely for driving trips. Shared parking can alleviate traffic congestion, allow for increased density near transit and pro- mote compact development. The main benefits of pursuing a shared parking strategy include: • Efficient and optimized use of existing parking infrastructure • Eliminate the burden on developers to build more parking • Support for transit -oriented development Outdated local ordinances can inhibit the possibility of applying shared parking to an area. To successfully implement new parking standards, it is necessary to mitigate any standing barriers to a shared parking initiative. 2 1. Understand the actual parking demand in a neighborhood. • Feasibility studies and understanding community traffic patterns are essential to successful implementation • A city planner, transportation expert and the community need to be involved • Understand current parking supply versus what is being used • Determine who is paying for current parking such as land owners, employers or users • Evaluate the price of parking as a lever that can change parking demand 2. Eliminate minimum parking standards. Minimum parking standards based on land uses lead to an over -supply of parking. To allevi- ate the waste of real estate, local governments can offer incentives and create directives to develop shared parking instead. 3. Change zoning laws and encouraging shared parking arrangements. Zoning laws can be changed to allow or encourage shared parking in existing areas with clus- tered businesses and other activity where much of the parking is private. The transport author- ity or appropriate government entity can further provide shared parking brokerage services to educate parties on policies surrounding the initiative. Brokers can write up agreements between two agencies or companies that outline the rules and obligations of each party. 4. Educate owners and tenants on bundled parking and the associated costs. • Many residents who rent or own homes or apartments are unaware of the costs associated with parking because it is often included in the price. It is the same with employees who might experience the effects of bundled parking in their lower salary —unbeknownst to them. • By unbundling the price of parking, people will be more likely to choose other transporta- tion options in lieu of driving. 5. Promote public transport and walkability through coordinated investment. • Investment in sidewalks, cycling infrastructure, bus services and aesthetics of the area will improve overall access and reduce driving. • Round-trip car -sharing programs will reduce car ownership and therefore parking demand. Determine how much parking already exists in a district and analyze how the spaces are used at different times. The city can develop a shared parking forecast based on how much parking demand it is willing to satisfy across different time periods as part of its mode share goals, break- ing the shared parking system down by weekday peaks, evening peaks and weekend peaks. Shared parking can be advantageous for developers, businesses and governments, but takes time and careful investment. It is a process that requires constant review and a coordinating body that can be a broker and analyze how spaces continue to be used. Stockholm Parkering in Stock- holm, Sweden is a parking authority that helps developers find available parking spaces in the surrounding district. Peak Parking Demand Banks Schools Distribution facilities Factories Medical clinics Offices Auditoriums Bars and dance halls Residents Meeting halls Restaurants Cinemas Religious institutions Parks Shops This table is an example of peak parking demand for different land use types. Parking can be shared efficiently by land uses with different peaks. Source: Modified from the original version from Victoria Transport Policy Institute .r fla; sy is p N ss e a.. ,. ■� ss ss N ii � g ossssout* .. sf as •s as ss q s w 1 1*"WON Downtown Indianapolis is using a shared parking approach while pushing forward better cycling and walking amenities leading to a more compact, mixed -use city center. Source: Joey8LS Photography on Flickr Montgomery County, Maryland, USA The County has several parking management districts that correspond with central business districts in several cities, such as Bethesda and Silver Spring, where a shared parking program is part of a long-term strategy to offer parking as a shared resource. The program enables financial lenders to consider shared parking if they are likely to withhold financing due to lack of parking in a development on -site plan. This has helped promote mixed -uses around transit. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA The city's Downtown Development Authority coordinates parking availability, location and price as part of the larger transport system that is essential to the urban core's vitality and growth. Rev- enue from public parking helps subsidize transit passes with priority spaces offered to car -sharing, vanpools and electric vehicles. Cost and lack of parking availability is cited as a top reason people shift to modes other than driving. The city makes an effort to keep walking and cycling infra- structure and transit mobility in top shape while helping to satisfy parking demands with existing public spaces. eiiing, chilna In early 2011, the Beijing government started promoting shared parking by encouraging and guiding institutions in opening their parking lots to the public after work hours. By the end of 2011, 61 parking lots were sharing 8,946 spaces in 6 central districts. Most of these shared parking lots are open to residents in the surroundings between 6pm and 8am. In late 2013, the Beijing gov- ernment approved another policy on shared parking where more details of the mechanism were explained. Charging for parking must be within the parameters permitted by the Parking Price Bureau and registration must be completed with the Industrial & Commercial Bureau. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy For more information, contact: Michael Kodransky 9 East 19th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10003 Tel. 212.629.8001 1 www.itdp.org SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802)864-0435 www.sburl.com September 05, 2017 Via Email Mr. Allen Palmer Palmer Company, Ltd. 5576 Dorset Street Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: 20 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Palmer, In response to your request as to the capability of the South Burlington water distribution system to supply water to the above referenced project we submit the following preliminary Allocation Determination: 1. Sufficient water storage is located at the South Burlington East Tank off Dorset Street in South Burlington. 2. Based upon your final allocation request, water service allocation and connection fees according to the City Water Ordinance Rate and Fee Schedule shall be applied to this project upon granting of final allocation. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified at any time by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council. Water allocation fees are due upon the projects final approval by the City of South Burlington. Water connection and related fees are due before construction begins. 3. Your additional water supply requirement of 2,130 gpd (with a total of 2,430 gpd) for this proposed project consisting of 9 two -bedroom residential apartments can be furnished by this Department without restricting or encumbering present South Burlington water customers. 4. Any significant increase in current demand or any change in use will require water allocation re -approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 5. You are also required to contact the Champlain Water District (CWD) in order that they verify supply, treatment, and transmission capability as the wholesale water supplier for the South Burlington Water Department. 6. Water is supplied to the referenced area through 8" water mains. 7. This Preliminary Allocation Determination shall not constitute a binding commitment of capacity to the applicant and may be revoked by the Superintendent before a final allocation of capacity is granted if uncommitted reserve capacity ceases to be available. A preliminary determination may be used by the applicant that a proposed development has sufficient water capacity available to proceed through the development process. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, South Burlington Water Department / John Tymecki Superintendent Cc. 1. Fay I Duncan J. Rabidoux R. Belair D. Hewitt Palmer Company, LTD Residential Conversion 20 Kimball Avenue, So. Burlington, VT Water and Sanitary Sewer Basis of Design August 21, 2017 Existing Water/Sewer Design Flow Water and Wastewater: (as permitted PB-4-12i3, 4C0310-3A) Two Story Office Building (addition to existing) 300 gpd Proposed Sewer Design Flow New Residential Apartments: 9 single-family units @ 210 gpd/bedroom = 1.890 gpd Deduction of flows previously permitted = -300 (,d Total Sewer addition: = 1,590 gpd Proposed Water Design Flow New Residential Apartments: 9 — two bedroom units @ 150 gpd/bedroom X 0.9 - 2,430 gpd Deduction of flows previously permitted = -300 gpd Total Water addition: = 2,130 gpd ['V`GADATAIPROlECI\8396WASISDN3. DOC. APPLICATION FOR WATER ALLOCATION * Items marked with an asterisk must be filled in by ALL applicants * Applicant Information Applicant: Contact Person: Mailing Address: Telephone & Fax for Contact: Property Owner Name (if not applicant): Property Owner Mailing Address: L7-D A L A 0 4�"ALi-1i X * Physical location of oject: Z a K I r1 L3,kLL J==` r3;}7 9 * Signature of App rcant " Project Information If the project is a single-family home, please check one: New Existing (For existing homes, no Application is required if revised demand is less than 1,000 gpd.) If not single-family home, project name: ZO kir-1k-�iaLl.. AVi * Application or Permit Numbers: (from Department of Planning & Zoning) Engineer's Information for Flows over 1,000 gpd Name of Engineer: D00&, 1-1k_w irt-- Firm. `—r0tj114 Mailing Address: i Z EtrB; c,.t'ji 5'3 J zt~iO-v, v Phone & Fax: PE License #: %`i 77 * Flow Calculations (You may substitute an engineer's calculation or letter containing the information requested below) 6 t_' f:-- A,'T ` A,!:! N h r] -RA 5 i.`� & !' J_-�, E S i L-,1\1 For additional bedrooms in single-family homes: Number of existing bedrooms: Number of additional bedrooms requested: Page t APPLICATION FOR WATER ALLOCATION For other residential projects, list number of bedrooms and units requested: _ Number of Number of units ! Gallons per day bedrooms x x per unit -Total flows 5 2 30 -- -- -- — _ _ 3 - — --- — -- -- 450 _ ;4 -- -- 600 ,5 750 6+ (specify) TOTAL For commercial and industrial projects, list existing and proposed tenants, uses and flows. Tenant / Number of Other Business I Type of use seats, SF, etc. I xJFlow per unit Ad'ustments] Total flow i TOTAL * Total development water flow requested: Please do not write below this line apartment Ap v y water up&intendent of er Preliminary Allocation approved: Final Allocation approved: Final Allocation Expires: (Date) For Extensions of -Final Allocation Only EXTENSION GRANTED (Date) G:Word:SSForms WaterallocationForm Page 2 gallons per day 9/�/�1z� Date v/ _ ate Date with permit # -. to (Date of Expiration) FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY WWA Permit # - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION for WASTEWATER ALLOCATION *Items marked with an asterisk must be filled in by ALL applicants *APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant: Palmer Company LTD Contact Person: Alan Palmer Mailing Address: 5576 Dorset Street Shelburne, VT 05482 Telephone & Fax for Contact Person: 802-598-9657 Property Owner Name (if not applicant): Property Owner Mailing Address: *Physical Locati9p of Project: 20 Kimball Avenue, So. Bqingpn *Signature of App cant * i 1n tux of party Owner (Both applicant and property owner MAST sign the application!) *Project Information If the project is a single-family home, please check one: E::]vew EDExisting If not a single-family home, project name: 20 Kimball Ave. Residential Converse *Application or Permit Numbers: (from Planning & Zoning office) Engineer's Information for flows over i,000 gpd Name of Engineer: Doug Hewitt, P.E. Firm: Summit Engineering, Inc. Mailing Address: 1233 Shelburne Road, C2, So. Burlington, VT 05403 Phone & Fax: 802-658-5588 PE License #: 7479 *Flow Calculations (You may substitute an engineer's calculation or letter for the information requested below) For residential DroiectS_ list n71m}wr of hpArnnmc and nni+c rnn —+-A Number of Bedrooms _ Number of Units X Gallons per day per unit = Total Flows 1 140 2 or more 210 TOTAL Notes: See Attached Basis of Design For commercial and industrial projects, list existing and proposed tenants, uses and flows: Tenant/ Type of use Number of Flows per Other Total Business seats SF etc X unit Ad justments Flow TOTAL "Total development wastewater flow requested: 1590 gallons per day Flow characteristics (for commercial and industrial projects) Volume: Flow rate: Strength: Please do not unite below this line Application & Recording Fee received: Receiving Plant: ort Pkwy City Center District: es Name Bartlett Bay ONo Date Approved by Water Pollution Control Department (Commercial and Industrial Projects) Director of Water Pollution Control Date Pre ' allocation issued: (payment offee is not required) 1 � L Director ning and Zoning Date Final allocation issued: (payment of fee is required, either in full or pro -rated for projects with multiple zoning permits involved) Director of Planning and Zoning Final allocation expires (Date) Date with permit # Zoning permit issued with permit# - - (Date) Associated WW connection permit (if applicable) # - For extensions of Final Allocation Only EXTENSION GRANTED to (Date) (Date of Expiration) 50% EXTENSION FEE PAID $ (Date) (Amount) f Palmer Company, LTD Residential Conversion 20 Kimball Avenue, So. Burlington, VT Water and Sanitary Sewer Basis of Design August 21, 2017 Existing Water/Sewer Design Flow Water and Wastewater (as permitted PB-4-1253, 4C0310-3A) Two Story Office Building (addition to existing) = 300 gpd Proposed Sewer Design Flow New Residential Apartments: 9 single-family units @ 210 gpd/bedroom = 1,890 gpd Deduction of flows previously permitted = -300 gpd Total Sewer addition: = 1,590 gpd Proposed Water Design Flow New Residential Apartments: 9 — two bedroom units @ 150 gpd/bedroom X 0.9 = 2,430 gpd Deduction of flows previously permitted = -300 gpd Total Water addition: = 2,130 gpd F1PEADATA%PR0JEC118 %%ASISOh3DOC Landscaping plan for 20 Kimball Ave, Some additions to the site plan to included a walking path from the existing building to an open recreation area, with a covered picnic table and seating around a kinetic wind sculpture, with raised bed gardens & rock piles. And in front of the existing building, three kinetic wind sculptures along with a seating bench and bike rack. The following is a list and cost for the above referenced items. Recreation area with covered picnic table and surrounding plantings & large rocks 1. Fence panels & stairs 2300.00 2. 4' gate 500.00 3.2 each 10' gates 700.00 4. 10' x 12' cover and picnic table 1575.00 5. kinetic wind sculpture 8" tall 2800.00 6. raised bed garden's & large stones 900.00 5. southern arrow wood 4 each planted (Viburnum Dentatum) 6. bridal veil spirea 8 each (Spirea Prunifolia) 7. ginko biloba tree 5'-6' tall (Maidenhair Tree) 8. magnolia tree 5'-6' tall (X loebneri Dr. Merrill 9. henry's garnet 6 each 1 gal. (Itea Sweetspire) 10. vernal witchhazel 2 each 1 gal (Hamamelis Vemalis) 11. bearberry 15 each 1 gal. (Arctostaphylos) urea -us "Massachussets" 12 Labor & stones to install the walking path SUB TOTAL Front of the existing building 1. kinetic wind sculpture 3 each (front) 11,700.00 2. bench & bike rack 1 each 375.00 3. large stones in piles 889.00 220.00 416.00 325.00 325.00 312.00 114.00 400.00 6500.00 17,387.00 TOTAL 30,351.00 Cost To Replace a 8" Dia Cedar Tree in front of 20 Kimball Avenue Price Quote from Gardners Supply 150.00 price quote, from Drinkwater Nursery 44.75 Attached . Fora 2" dia. 8-10 tall cedar Average cost will be 97.38 for a 2" tree planted. Using the attached Landscape Tree Appraisal, Department of Horticulture (Purdue University Extension Service) attached. Replacement Calculations for a 8" dia tree Base Value 2" tree = 3.1 in square $97.38 divided by 3.1 = $31.42/ in square Cross section area for 8" dia tree = 50.3 Species Class 60 Condition Class .5 Location Class .75 Computation $97.38 x 50.3 x .5 x .75 = $1,836.83 replacement value DRINKWATEWS NURSE. INC - SHANE DRINKWATER 2016 Price List ... ;................................».........».«._..............«.......:-....,.............................:..«�.........«.«...«« .. ......... » ... ..» ..........................................- . . ............ . DELIVERED INSTALLED ..................... ............. « » «pSUGAR C_ EDAR (Add $-75/tree for burlap wrap) : MAPLE Single tree, 3 to 4 feet » «» ««_»€ .»_ $_ w«» »«r. »». »« «« « « =_ 6 00 { 0.00 - I6 to 8 feet » _._._._...... Single tree, 4 to 5 feet« «« . § $ 8.00 $ 13.00 = »« _ 8 to 10 feet « «.«. Single trees 5 to 6 feet ...«. $ «...««».._... «.._........_..« 11.00 $ «... �........... ,17.00 7.. .... ..4.. G10 to 12 feet ..«...».............«.......«....................»....«...«.«.q«....y.....«............«.1 «...y. ..................... _ . _.. ... ....... ..«.........«...«...i.«..............««..«.......».4.....a...............«. •- :Sin le tree 6 to 8 feet ; $ 28.Q0 °1 1%2 inch caliper ::Single tree, 8 to 10 feet ... , «......._«.«.5.....«.... ..._....«e ._' $ 26.00 I $ 44.00 I , A 2 inch calm r -0Clump/Improved: 4 to 5 feet* a $««« 20.00 a_» ;Clump/Improved, 5 to 6 feet* .. « ... $ «.«.12.00 m « 15.00 _...«.» 26.00 . S_OF7' _RED_MAPLE „«..««.« $ �.. «._ «. 6 to 8 feet «..«.._.«................................, ............. ««.... «... «««.«__ »« _.«« _.« «»«».._«_........« «..«« ».. ....« ..._..«.... «.«« HEMLOCK (Shad Locations) « 8 to 10 feet « .................... «.................. _.......................«...«......Y._....« ......._«........._..... 3 to 4 feet* «.«..«.««.«.....»».............«.....«__«..«.�.........« ..... _ .............I......... 1 «it If2 '• $ 19.00 <: inch caliper ,..................«.._«............_-.-»...�$.._._..........».»2:�Q.1. 4 to 5 feet * $ 16.00 ,. «....-.. ,.. «..... � $ 28.00 r....... « .....:........................................................................ 2 inch tali r pe ....... ................... _ .. :5 to 6 feet *« .............. 23.00 ...: $ .....«« ...... ...q.......«...............................«...«_-.- 36.00 w«...... ...d... ........................................ -------..«......« €6 to 8 feet * y...........................................-............_.«.....«... `p..-...................«...««.....j.««.y....«.................««....«...y..«...«.. € $ 38.00 € _ $ 66.00 : ...«...j....w......_.«.«.»..........«.... ,r WHITE ASH «.« ................................. r ... ....« «.._ ««« s .« c .....»« ....«.«..»..«»... c............ - ...»« i ... ». « ....._..»....«........-............................... =6 to 8 feet 8 to 10 feet............................. _.........«.........«.«............«........................«.......«a 3 to 4 feet «..........-•----......... ........:......a_$........._.............................."._........i. : a """""""" $ 11.00 18.00 4 to 5 feet ; $ 15.00 ° s $ 25.00 Ir « :WHITE BIRCH..-q......................«._...... .... ..................... _.............. 6..._.........«............«....... ..... 1........... ........ ....«........... ......« .....�_..;6_to I5 to 8 feet $ 21.00 $ 36.00 S fe_et»........_«.................................. _........................._.............«........... _«.«.««.«._.«. I6 to 8 feet « »«........ « ««_.. « .« .»«.._.... $ 37.00 : $ 65.00 .».«..V _ 8 to 10 feet............................................ ..q............................................«.....«...........«...«..M-.«............«.«......-.......a......:y«......._.»......_...«.».«..y.....«. ... .... (.«.p........................»....«...«.... «.«««... .................. « ..............»...»-......«....»......« ....... _ . .... «.«_ »..._« . .... _ I i BALSAM ..«.... i ...... «..= ................. .......................... RAY BIRCH .........................................................................4...................................................................... @3 to 4 feet : .. ...... $ 11.00 _ $ 18.00 G Single tree, 8 to 10 feet ................. .........................................................._..........._ $.._.. I4 to 5 feet 16.00 I I $ 28.00 = _ « :Clump, 8 to 10 feet...q.................. ........... ..... ...--- ......-....._.........._......p................._......._._.....,......y__««............................q........«. «.- ...- ..-....«.,...«....................................... €5 to 6 feet € $ 43.00 6 to 8 feet ...w......» $ 37A0 $ 65 00 `POPLAR -COMMON « ......................»..«..........«...«.._._.........».....q..........._._._..«..».«.«.-»-«,....«.,««...._..............._.«.....«y........« ...d................................«.......--.-»......««...........w.._ .................« : .».«_««.«.......»..»...............«... ......«...... �..;........-«-----.«..........«..« `...«....� ..... • =6 to 8 feet WHITESPRUCE _ -8 to 10 feet ................... 13 to 4 feet : 6 $.....«...... «11_.0_0 . .$.. ».».....« ..1_8.00 ":...» .-t ...... ri- to .12 feet ......................................... ,4 to 5 feet........«.«............................«....$.....««....�16.00«M.......$...............28.00 a.........z..........h«.4....«................................................................. 15 to 6 feet I $ 23.00 _ € $ 43.00 I -- -LARCH-TAMARACK -------------------------- .........«......... ....................... to 8 feet € 65.00 �= 'Sto 6 feet ...q..........«...................«»...».«......_...........«.-----.--...... «.--................ ««.... .p....«j............ .............................................. :-6 to 8 feet :.............................................................................«.««..........................:...._E....._.............._..............:.....-..... »....... ............. .q........... .-... € to 10 feet .... - Limited Quantities s, STATE IN . ..... Guaranteedfor one year if we ii 4..... ..........»_««.._.._ ._..«............___....._«a..... .«..... _ ._._.... h..«;_«.«.«.. «..._. .«. _ inst e .................................................................... ...........................« g............._..............«.. -a ..... « ^ - IF trees are watered dai .................... _... «.. ...» _ « .......«....._«_ ..a.- «........«...««I _. L««-M...-... «_ ........«_ ' ..... Orders less than $200.00 me 8 2 5; A / C � ' 6J15'S YL, Landscape Horticulture • HO-201-W Appendix 11 Department of Horticulture Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service West Lafayette, IN Landscape Tree Appraisal Michael N. Dana Appraising the Monetary Value of Landscape Plants Landscape plants serve functional and esthetic roles in rural, urban commercial, or residential landscapes. Such plants have market value much like real estate, but that value is often difficult to determine. In the case of loss of landscape plants, however, it may be necessary to establish a monetary value to validate an insurance claim or to justify a loss to the Internal Revenue Service. Appraisal of landscape plants is not a precise process. Often, the opinion of an expert plantsman orconsulting arborist is required, especially in the case of claims, which are decided through litigation. However, homeowners can get some idea of the value of their landscape plants by following the procedures outlined in this bulletin. In some cases, a value determined by the homeowner may be sufficient to settle a claim, or to satisfy the IRS. Three different methods are used by professionals to arrive at a value for landscape plants. Select the simplest method, which is appropriate to the size and number of landscape plants for which a value is required. Decrease in Assessed Value of Real Estate When many plants are affected on a piece of property, or when a dominant landscape element is lost, then the change in assessed valuation may be the best indicator of value. Ask a realtor or land appraiser to assess the property with and without the plant or plants affected. Agood, recent photograph of the landscape is valuable in establishing the property status before the loss. Replacement Cost Small trees or shrubs that are easily transplanted at their full size can be appraised by determining the cost of replacement. A local nurseryman can quote replacement costs, which should include removal ofthe dead or damaged plant, installation, post -transplanting care, and a survival guarantee. If the plant was in poor condition prior to the loss, the appraised value may be less than the full cost of replacement. Formula Computation The formula method is in widespread use for large, individual trees, which exceed the size that is usually transplanted. It is a hybrid of the replacement cost method and a process of extending that cost to larger plants. The guidelines for this method are distributed by the Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers and are accepted by professionals in the landscape industry and the real estate and legal disciplines. The formula is as follows: Tree Value = Base Value x Cross Section Area x Species Class x Condition Class x Location Class Base Value Base Value is the dollar amount assigned to one cross- section unit (square inch or square centimeter) of a tree's trunk cross-section area. It is based on the cost of the largest available replacement plant of similar species. To compute the base value, find the cost (usu- ally the installed price) of a replacement -size tree from a local nursery or landscape company. Then, divide that amount by the trunk cross -sectional area of the replacement tree. That amount is the base value for that cross -sectional unit. For example, if a 2 inch trunk diameterreplacement tree will cost $150 installed, then Revised 1/06 Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service Page 1 of 4 Landscape Horticulture - HO-201-V� divide $150 by 3.1 sq.in. (from Table 1) to determine that one square inch of cross -sectional area is valued at $48.40 (rounded to the nearest dime). Table 1. Diameter and Cross Section Area of Tree Trunks. Inches Centimeters Trunk Cross -Section Trunk Cross -Section Diameter Area Diameter Area 2 3.1 5 19.6 4 12.6 10 78.5 6 20.3 15 176.7 8 50.3 20 314.2 10 78.5 25 490.9 12 113.1 30 706.9 14 153.9 35 962.1 16 201.1 40 1256.6 18 254.5 45 1590.4 20 314.2 50 1963.5 22 380.1 55 2375.8 24 452.4 60 2827.4 26 530.9 65 3318.3 28 615.8 70 3848.5 30 706.9 75 4417.9 32 804.3 80 5026.6 34 907.9 85 5674.5 36 1017.9 90 6361.7 38 1134.1 95 7088.2 40 1256.6 100 7854.0 Cross -Section Area is used to express tree size. It is the cross - sectional area of the tree trunk measured about one foot (30 cm) above ground level for trees with trunk size up to 12 inches (30 cm) in diameter, or at about 4 1/2 feet (140 cm) above ground level for trees with greater than 12 inch (30 cm) trunk diameter. Cross-section area can be calculated from trunk diameter by us- ing the formula diameter' x 0.7854. It can be computed in either square inches or square centimeters. Cross-section areas for trunk diameters ranging from 2 inches to 40 inches and 5 cm to 100 cm are listed in Table 1. Abnormal trunk structures such as low -branch crotches or forked trunks, burls, or wound scars at the prescribed location for diameter measurement require that the measurement be taken at a different location. Typically, such measurements are made 6 to 12 inches (15 to 30 cm) below the abnormality. A multi -stemmed tree is measured as separate trunks and then a combined size value is computed. Compute the cross-section areas for all but the largest stem, add them together, and multiply that total by 0.50. Add that value to the cross-section area of the largest stem. The result is a multi -stemmed cross section area value. Species Class Species Class is an assigned value based on all the landscape merits of a landscape tree species and its accompanying potential for problems. Criteria used in determining spe- cies class include form, color, growth habit, flowering and fruiting characteristics, structural strength, longevity, insect and disease resistance or susceptibility, and maintenance requirements. Each tree species can be assigned any value from 1 % to 100% but for practical simplicity, species are usually placed in one of five percentage classes (100, 80, 60, 40, 20). Table 2 is a listing of species class values for many common landscape trees of Indiana. Express the class as a decimal for use in the formula. Thus, 80 becomes 0.80, 100 becomes 1.00, etc. Condition Class Condition Class is a factor indicating the health, vigor and life expectancy of a tree, as well as its quality of form relative to a "perfect specimen" of that species. This value can be any per- centage from 1 % to 100%, but is commonly expressed as one of five percentage categories (100, 80, 60 to 40, 20, 0). The rating is based on such defects as wounds, decay, storm damage, insect or disease damage, and poor form. Very few trees are perfect specimens. However, it is possible to improve condition class if proper cultural treatments are given. The accuracy of the value assigned for tree condition is dependent on the expertise of the appraiser. It is this judgement which may be most difficult for the nonprofessional to make. Damage to the trunk,forexample, may significantly reduceatree's life expectancy, or the damage may be superficial; and while unsightly, it may not indicate a poorer condition and shortened life span. Professional consultation may be necessary to determine this factor. Table 3 can serve as a guide in assigning condition class values. Location Class Location Class is based on the functional and aesthetic contribu- tion, which the tree makes to the site, the placement of the tree on the site, and the importance of the location in the landscape context of the community. This factor can be rated at any per- centage from 1% to 100 %. Table 4 can be used as a beginning point by assigning a value based on location. Judgement will be required to incorporate functional, aesthetic, and placement quality into the value. Use these considerations to determine a specific value from the ranges presented in the table. The elements of location class are: 1. Site location. Identical trees on two different sites may be valued quite differently. For example, a large, healthy tree in a remote location on a golf course fairway would not rate as highly as the same tree in a residential yard. 2. Functional and aesthetic value. Trees function as visual screens, windbreaks, climate moderating elements, architectural elements, sculpture, background, framing and unifying elements, in air purification, and can provide cover for wildlife. An evalu- ation of the tree's role in the landscape is essential to accurately assign a location value. 3. Plant placement. A plant's value may be diminished by a location, which interferes with utility lines, is deleterious to other trees, or is a safety hazard or public nuisance. Page 2 of 4 Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service Revised 1/06 Table 2. Species Class Values for Some Indiana Landscape "Dees. Common Name Botanical Name Species Class Evergreen Conifers Arborvitae (White Cedar) Thuja spp. 60 *Cedar of Lebanon Cedrus libani 100 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 100 *False Cypress Chamaecyparis spp. 80 Fir, Balsam Abies balsamea 40 Fir, White Abies concolor 100 Hemlock, Canada (eastern) Tsuga canadensis 100 Juniper, Chinese Juniperus chinensis 40 Juniper, American (red cedar) Juniperus virginiana 60 Pine, Austrian Pinus nigra 60 Pine, Eastern White Pinus strobus 80 Pine, lack Pinus banksiana 20 Pine, Red (Norway) Pinus resinosa 60 Pine, Scots Pinus sylvestris 40 *Pine, Virginia Pinus virgimana 20 Spruce, Black Hills Picea glauca "Densata" 80 Spruce, Colorado Blue Picea pungens 100 Spruce, Norway Picea abies 100 Spruce, Serbian Picea omorika 80 Spruce, White Picea glauca 80 Yews Taxus spp. 80 Broad -Leaved or Deciduous Trees Alder, Black Alnus glutinosa 60 Ash, Blue Fraxinus quadrangulata 20 Ash, Green Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Ash, Green, Seedless Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Cultivars subintegerrima 20 Ash, White Fraxinus americana 20 Bald Cypress, Common Taxodium distichum 100 Beech, American Fagus grandifolia 100 Beech, European Fagus sylvatica 100 Birch, Cutleaf European Betula pendula "Gracilis" 20 Birch, European White Betula pendula 20 Birch, Paper (White) Betula papyrifera 20 Birch, River Betula nigra 80 Blackhaw Viburnum prunifolium 80 Boxelder (Male Tree) Acer negundo 40 (Female Tree) 20 Buckeye, Ohio Aesculus glabra 60 Buckthorn, European Rhamnus cathartica 40 Buckthorn, Glossy Rhamnus frangula 20 Butternut Juglans cinerea 40 Catalpa, Northern Catalpa speciosa 20 Catalpa, Southern Catalpa bignonioides 20 Cherry Plum Prunus cerasifera 40 Cherry, Black Prunus serotina 40 Cherry, Pin Prunus pennsylvanica 40 Chestnut, Chinese Castanea mollissima 80 Chokecherry Prunus virginiana 20 Chokecherry, Shubert's Prunus virginiana "Shubert" 40 Coffee -tree, Kentucky Gymnocladus dioicus 80 Corittree, Amur Phellodendron amurense 100 Cottonwood, Eastern Populus deltoides 40 Crabapples (Ornamental) Malus spp (Scab resistant) 100 (Scab susceptible) 40 Cucumbertree Magnolia acuminata 60 Dogwood, Alternate -leaved Cornus alternifolia 80 Dogwood, Flowering Cornus fiorida 100 Dogwood, Japanese Cornus kousa 100 Elm, American Ulmus americana 20 Elm, Siberian Ulmus pumila 20 Elm, Slippery (Red) Ulmus rubra 20 Ginkgo (Male Tree) Ginkgo biloba 100 (Female Tree) 80 *Golden Chain Tree Laburnum x watereri 80 Goldenraintree Koelreuteria paniculata 60 Gum, Black Nyssa sylvatica 100 Hackberry Celtis occidentalis 60 Hawthoms Crataegus spp. (rust resistant) 100 (scab resistant) 80 Hickory, Bittemut Carya cordiformis 60 Hickory, Shagbark Carya ovata 60 *Holly, American llex opaca 80 Honeylocust, Common Gleditsia triacanthos 40 Honeylocust, Thornless Gleditsia triacanthos and Cultivars var. inermis 60 • inter ar Hess m,ts this tree's use ut range to the sou[ em portion of Indi— Its species dws in nor Landscape Horticulture • HO-201-W e 2. (continued) imon Name Botanical Name Species Class td-leaved or Deciduous Trees (continued) [beam, American Carpinus caroliniana 100 echestnut, Common Aesculus hippocastanum 80 ehestnut, Red Aesculus carnea 80 Hood Ostrya virginiana 80 ura Tree Cercidiphyllum japonicum 100 It, Eastern (Tamarack) Larix laricina 40 h, European Larix decidua 100 h, Japanese Larix kaempferi 100 ;, Japanese Tree Syringa reticulata 80 en, American (Basswood) Tilia americana 60 en, Greenspire Tilia cordata "Greenspire" 100 en, Littleleaf Telia cordata 80 en, Redmond Ttlia x euchlora "Redmond" 100 ist, Black Robinia pseudoacacia 20 nolia, Saucer Magnolia soulangiana 60 gnolia, Southern Magnolia grandijiora 80 nolia, Star Magnolia Stellata 100 le, Amur Acer ginnala 80 le, Black Acer nigra 100 le, Hedge Acerr campestre 100 pie, Japanese Acer palmatum 100 le, Norway & Cultivars Acer platanoides 100 le, Red and Cultivars Acer rubrum 80 le, Silver Acer saccharinum 40 le, Sugar Acer saccharum 100 le, Sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus 60 le, Tatarian Acer tatarica 80 pie, Trident Acer buergeranum 100 main Ash, American Sorbus americana 60 main Ash, European Sorbus aucuparia 40 Perry, Red Morus rubra 20 Perry, White (Fruiting Tree)Morus alba 20 (Fruitless Cultivar) 60 iyberry Viburnum lentago 80 Black Quercus velutina 80 Bur Quercus macrocarpa 100 Chestnut Quercus muehlenbergit 100 Northern Red Quercus rubra 100 Pin Quercus palustris 80 :, Post Quercus stellata 60 Red Quercus rubra 100 Scarlet Quercus coccinea 80 Shingle Quercus imbricaria 100 Shumard Quercus shumardii 80 Swamp Chestnut Quercus michauxii 80 Swamp White Quercus bicolor 100 Uptight English Quercus robur "Fastigiata" 60 White Quercus alba 100 :, Willow Quercus phellos 80 e Orange Maclura pomifera 40 Paw, Common Asimina triloba 60 -h, Flowering Prunus persica 60 Callery Cultivars Pyrus calleryana 80 mmon, Common Diospyros virginiana 60 ietree, London Plantanus x acerifolla 40 , American Prunus americana 40 tr, Bolleana Populus albs "Bolleana" 40 tr, Lombardy Populus nigra "Italica" 20 us Populus spp. 40 e-leaf Sand Cherry Prunus x cistena 40 ud, Eastern Cercis canadensis 40 +ood, Dawn Metasequola glyptostroboides 100 Pan -olive Elaeagnus angustifolia 40 ifras, Common Sassafras albidum 80 lar Tree, Chinese Sophora japonica 80 ceberry Amelanchier spp. 80 wood Oxydendrum arboreum 80 tc, Staghom Rhus iyphina 80 t -gum Liquidambar styracifiva 80 note, American Plaianus occidentalis 40 of -heaven Ailanthus altissima 20 -tree Liriodendron tulipifera 60 ut, Black Juglans nigra 80 ws Salix spp. 20 wwood, American Cladastris lutea 60 :ova Japanese Zelkova serrata 80 Revised 1/06 Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service Page 3 of 4 Landscape Horticulture • HO-201-W) Description Condition Values Class for use in formula Excellent Perfect specimen. Excellent form and vigor for species. No pest problems or mechanical 100 injuries. No corrective work required. Minimum life expectancy 30 years beyond the time of inspection. Good Healthy and vigorous. No apparent signs of insect, disease, or mechanical 80 injury. Little or no corrective work required. Form representative of species. Minimum life expectancy 20 years. Fair Average condition and vigor for area. May be in need of some corrective 60 or 40 pruning or repair. May lack desirable form characteristics of species. May show minor insect, disease, or physiological problems. Minimum life expectancy 10 years. Poor General state of decline. May show severe mechanical, insect, or disease 20 injury, but death not imminent May require major repair or renovation. Minimum life expectancy 5 years. Dead or Dead, or death imminent within 5 years 0 range 0.1-0.0 1.0 range 1.0-0.9 0.8 range 0.9-0.7 0.6 or 0.4 range 0.7-0.3 0.2 range 0.3-0.1 'M 4. Site Location Values for Shade and Ornamental Trees. ite Location Location Class Values for use in Formula* pecimen or historical trees 100 0.9-1.0 average residential, landscape trees 80-90 0.8-0.9 4alls and public area trees 70-80 0.7-0.8 ,rboretum, park and recreation trees 60-80 0.6-0.8 iolf course trees 60-80 0.6-0.8 'ity street trees 60-80 0.6-0.8 ;nvironmental screen trees 60-80 0.6-0.8 ndustrial area trees 50-70 0.5-0.7 hut -of --city highway trees 40-60 0.4-0.6 lative, open woods trees 20-40 0.2-0.4 Functional or placement deficiencies will reduce site location values Examples 1. A 10" diameter Sugar Maple, excellent health and form, specimen tree in a city park. Local nursery esti- mate for a 2" diameter replacement tree, installed, is $200. Base Value: 2" tree = 3.1 in cross section area; $200 _ 3.1 in = $64.50/in2 Cross Section Area: 10" tree = 78.5 in (from table) [or 102 x 0.7854 = 78.5 in2] Species Class: 100 (use 1.0 in formula) Condition Class: 100 (use 1.0 in formula) Location Class: 60-80, Select 70 (use 0.7 in formula) Computation: $64.50/in2 x 78.5 in2 x 1.0 x 1.0 x 0.7 = $3544 2. A 40cm Silver Maple, good health and form, specimen in residential yard. Local nursery estimate for a 3cm diameter replacement tree, installed, is $50. Base Value: 3cm tree = 7.07 cm2 cross section area; $50 _ 7.07 cm2 = $7.08/cm2 Cross Section Area: 40cm tree = 1256 cm2 (from table) [or 402 x 0.7854 = 1256.6 cm2] Species Class: 40 (use 0.4 in formula)5 Condition Class: 80 (use 0.8 in formula) Location Class: 90 (use 0.9 in formula) 3. A 4" Red Oak, excellent health and form, specimen tree along city street. Local nursery estimate for a 1.5" diameter replacement tree, installed, is $500. Base Value: 1.5" tree = 1.77 in cross section area; $500 _ 1.77 in2 = $282.49/in2 Cross Section Area: 4" tree = 12.6 in (from table) [or 42 x 0.7854 = 12.57in2] Species Class: 100 (use 1.0 in formula) Condition Class: 100 (use 1.0 in formula) Location Class: 80 (use 0.8 in formula) For more information on the subject discussed in this publication, consult your local office of the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service. Page 4 of 4 Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service Revised 1/06 SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Business Office 550 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-652-7053 September 15, 2017 Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: 20 Kimball Avenue --Change of use Dear Mr. Belair: We have been asked by Alan Palmer to comment on his proposed zoning change at 20 Kimball Avenue. We do not believe that this change would create an unreasonable burden on the school district. When any expected school children from this relatively small number of units are spread across the entire K-12 grade levels it is not likely to create overcrowding in any of the affected schools. Sincerely, John P. Aubin Business Manager 20170915 Palmer Zone Change No Text Whitaker Studio I Maine Art Gallery Palmer Company Ltd. Sculpture Layout recommendation io/5/2oi7 Concept notes: Sculpture to sculpture spacing based on a 1o" max sculpture sway 16" Clearance From closest point on sculpture to building Sculpture in front (tallest) will hang over sidewalk Bi er Building Double Helix entrance Horizontal Huge @+24" Height 3 .� 3 j Double Helix Horizontal Huge @+48" Height Double Helix Horizontal Huge @Regular Height 3. Sidewalk Met Doherty <rmdoherty@aol.com> Jul 3 to me Alan I have run the numbers, and the roof of Phase 3 can support the weight of solar panels. I assumed a maximum of 10 pounds per square foot for the arrays with ballast. The existing stone ballast could be left in place or removed. I have not looked at the other phases. Let me know if you need a formal letter on this. Mel Richard M. Doherty, P.E. 595 Dorset Street Suite #6 South Burlington, VT 05403 p - 802-660-9212 f - 802-660-8403 c - 802-373-4735 [To v 1 �7 w co 0 V) CIS N ZWC)W a LWAhV4QF L710° SM�� PAAIHC AREA 28878' I I I I D+41TIli] D , - AU7ASC AAP7 JP' OIW 1 Rb1 s /F�[1PAbV J/ PARtl1L',4H�A LOIOM" \ D PNEIaWJA�A -_ N 5278 30 E eve' 20 fflW,4LL AlfN(/E - y A�ICi" 3 FL Gu"45 � N � - h � _ ea5' GAS ,477NCf SFME7P CQ Aw m r • RETAIN/NC W.AyLL ��' 0 p� Y •' E OInMM1ti1 ' .R 1PAOi' M• S I 7ELLF7KY2r � W sm C 288. 70' 17.9'AtY+. yy SERw6VT GAS 5YS7EVS WC - — /:O F.O —Raw O°T.r' UNE S EA75' m 6 WAY JLis r— uAVHF — ❑ GRAPHIC SCALE O ?O 40 bO dYI 700 lOB'AM. GU.H9 A ZOULL AMFOWT Ac JrMcx Enl nNL N rax a, RA tgAJENT LEGEND PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY LIMIT ® SET HOLLOW METAL PIPE AND CAP QQ RECOVERED HOLLOW METAL PIPE EXISTING LIGHT —E\T— ELECTRIC/TELEPHONE UTILITY LINE EXISTING TREE Ti EXISTING HYDRANT ❑ CATCH BASIN Da EXISTING UTILITY EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING GUARD RAILS ® SEWER CLEAN OUT !. 7La 1prW Sr4JXW 9i0PY£Y AWS aM-OMED UWNC A ArONLJ M? AM S/IV 77791 TOTAL STA MV 6!,lr 0Wi' MfWa/7E WIN A LSYmAT 407 OA A GYYL r0f.. N/S' WSMOVVT LYWTAWS A 0" AW en"'C NSA7W ANO ALIADW IC W09FC7KW FO7 LXYLWAMV &W,%W, 74NI514W IMF AVLSES M-'W RAW OVA'" Mf7N AN "'t4P lV W PER STA'"V Or P g SL MW PER STAAW /N ALL O7NER RESRECTS INNS SWWY SL�STANRA[L Y Ad= 7AY �j ArUl lVV75 O' A aA55 U'.ALRYFY AS RET7NE0 BY 7NE A VAM1W S7ANL'A�N7 A1TAII V, AFPVfR5WN7S ,w .W AL W.4C9V LAND nRE -gWkfY A 2 AS P 771E NA7XWAL CZA'YJ WMAPANLlr R?06;PAw FOP !NE alY CY SLY/)N BlR9LWC7OV, YFAiYOV7, CaW6 W7Y AN2Z NL/AJAFF 5XI..95 LXri%I ?AIM J-IB-BI .9O7MAVC ZOiE' N' AZ[YA7 YIS IwAS,w7O45 NOT Ar7FRAJINEO, INNS PRYJ LrRIY IS NOTW )NE IX YEAR J NO EA.gAEN15 fYYA1m FOP UJl(/lk'S OVTO DILS PA000hVrr' A .1111.1 Ill 11.11/ 6C9q'dvC76V 1AY86A[L A{ENLI /S .17. A'EO NX. Ila /°O AM OAIED B-J-/977 f,W]V W:'MQVr A9-AP7AC9Vr O<AM/WAYS RJ 07Y Or SLY/71 Jt4Whw OV 6lf7Ar'PA"=S AO 4P48RJ4A44 Alm!B A.S-QmM OV PAO:S 4.4 AN7 B a-MAa Or kYWWAY ASPECT 5W7N &ARMIM Ae SW'J•t S 7NE RAW" 9%X AIFM4WAt7Vr IS OVF (V PE7P TJO 5YW7A4E FEET Or NET 097 CAS ,W?kfaF 9-A/0.4 7AS BUYOs1'C O9vTA/NS J2lO) 57X/ARE FEET Or NET .SPACE A7dt7J AE'O/AFLS /JO p(I,y�o 9^A4M THE 707AL PARAZV .S AAl AREA S 7JO S AaS S 7/E hVWr Or 7NE BLNZaW /S 27' I- OV 7JE S1ftTT 9QE 71E 177Y REpl7AE/JEN7 ❑ /S Js' NArlwcw -Sr7. NV BOWA WY SWWr IS NOr 7D Ar COVS7AY1M AS A O-RII</C MV Lr 771E lO 7NE s 527850 0' A 6N9S —A jI" �.� E naIC LEA CMW AT7aAVEr 286.12' �GLz aw AcsrRbw" Of' PROPd9PTY A Q%WrY MW AW MV AS NLW &V PO 47469Aa AN9W/E AAm /S LLr'AAD OV 7NE EAS,7R r 90.r Or AA&4 L AIfNLE W M aTY O< Sal7J "4AVIOV Or QW77EAS OXWTYW Re STA7F Or l£9M9V7 ANO A9V0,lW7NER ArSaWM AS AXIOMS BF"LUMfI C Ar AN ARW APE SET /N 7NE OPDLWD IVAAYH✓G 7NE NOP7NMEST LYW " O` LOrMAItW A7W (5) 0WlD BY,*W oS6YW AND MWS7OV NARr AAm & NO MF 5rVNMEST A'EARAAiX M 6VAR7 a7MZR 0- LOT NUMBER 9X (B) &NO A''SY]P,BEO, SW APE BOND OV 777E EASMIZ Y MW Or RA&S - O9' ASG 7/E &V ITAOr AYQVT Or WAY LMd7 O< KWJRALL A{£NJ/E. �E AAOUNTAW 1fE.VY'E APR�FR'NC OV A ArAMNC Or N J7YI Y" ALOVG 7NF FAS7£.K Y EOOf Q< 7Nf AW Fa WAY L/ANT Ar K fAV A{ENCE A a' 7ANfr' A PBB7d AM TO AV APOV P,C'E SE7 /N llE701W4 SI/O FKY 9A6A ZWW. it Q<779.87'fEE7.0 Ar) YOr7NEELrT V JNE A iOr A A' WAY LWW Or ORAE0 Yr 7W ,f7 iliY A7NC AC.S7� AT JA£ SO'/)NNEST LYWNLA Qr Y t o ZC'*Ar R .S�'ufN (lJ avAA BY ZISla AVR7/AVIs BAFta: 7AVVIX I EaNC OVA ArAAWC Or N 5P7BJm'£ ALOVC THE SYY/7N AY &WNLNRY Q<LOT A01`7AR SEVEN (7J A OslANQr Or?Bll.SI' FEET )D AV pMV AFE ,51TW 771E C.RX/NO EMSJAVC QVOEAPOPYY/NO AT 77/E Ar7Pfi£AST Lt79YE7P A' LOT MT//VArF 9X (BJ AEAPEAV Li�3r)%ArR ELEC7AC 7ENL1r P�WA2EAWC OV A l A',r C A<S JfYI'JO f ALOVC 1HE M£S7EAYY BCYA'OARY LY AMAV9.7V OWIN 00WO A O'.fTANL1r O<,M1%,7' AEE7 10 AN ASYiV PArE Fp/NR 9WR7rF 7.E71Yi )W6nrFaA'O OV A GCAAWO Or S 5178"JO'M' ALOVC IAAE N0P7N dXHmARY dr LOTAtaeq? AYf (5J A OC umr OrPM/7'TEEr 70 AN 4aw Rm Ar7W 7NE 00520V WhW7 7dE A74VT Or REaWNWC Or JJ//S ROWY AS 9.aW OV MJLF7 aVE (1/ �,T or A.;v rRTY BEAVC LOT N(/AIiR 9X (SJ AS 9AiM/V LW fYAN Or 2BY NES5 PARK NOP)7J' BY AFVAA" aWL OKWIMWN. 4S5WAIES Ill SVEZAI RXE WAWWT, AND O47ED 44OTS71.478 AS AP[iEC7 MW ZV AY44 Or RE (W W A /Sj fC 77 O< 7NE T L O W A091 bY/AYWCIa✓ LAND RELrWOS .S1/O COTE77Y N 9X U 7hF SW5 B7,BO9 SYY/ARE ArET OP I.W AG%YS E 177 paY BL7NG' ALL THE S.1wE THAT WiLS AND GYY✓YE)ED lO ALAN Q PAGMER /N KY. 771, PG /!R ❑ IdM 97TI.8' IPUVRAWiZ' SURF" ,cw ALAND.PA4,1 R ❑ Q f 21 AUUWX L=4W AT _ _ L�77T7f9GfTlGiY VERMONT LAND SURVEYORS mor AV' R16 ar WAY / 4FR77EY 70ALAN R PALYER.Wm UV17D Or QVAJJA LACE W.7Z~AZ LYWPANY N47 7NGS 1-YA7 /S JMMV UR7V A Amw SYe wr EA757WC "r," EV9X:NLSr R'.FO RESEARO7 A a 0MV IOTAL S7A7J0V LYIV7Na IRA{ERSE Awnws SYAPYFY O< RUMNESS PAAW NOPI7J' AS N07F0 A6t7{E ANO W1004AMV MA9YED BY A4A PALI697 MARK V. WARD 4050 WMLISPON RD. SO. BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05403 DATE NO*MFDR 700 SURVEYED r Z.W/SW A L 4&DFl A PROJECT DRAWN A LAW%WT A .909P .SNEFT P A<1 CHECKED NA411' V IM9R0 CALCULATED wA,91' ✓. MW,Y/D I I H I I I I I I I 1 I H � I D I I I I cOMrosrre 9Ena1 — --- �., PAVILION W/PKNIC TABLE -- WIND SCULPTURE INSfAL1.ATlUN — - PIANTINO ARlu N/F MERCHANTSBANK/ COMMUNITY BANK SITE PLAN 1" - 201-099 N/F MUNSON PROPERTY 15'A^ PEDESTRIAN 7 � 5 • ' - - -LARGE BOULDER BASE '1d COMYUSI I'F: IO:NCfI- I 11'�" % J'-T WIND SCULPTURE HORS I T - FLOOR 7 7 7 6 T j 1/8" — 1/-099 I I srcr•�} i I W7 s KIMBALL AVENUE �z g2;e PRESSURE -TREATED WOOD STAIRS < W/ 1112, A. H DIANDRAILS u e Eu 9a F�{ 3 d c Su i. �OOO y�sa PLANTING LIST PREPARED RV SHANNON B. PALMER 0R3-59RAI10 ID/ PLANTING LIST PREPARED RV SHANNON B. PALMER 0R3-59RAI10 ID/ PbA Name IfBL1 NeeN FORM SUE PRICE OTY 1 WMmcm DanblWn SUNPNI OVAL 79 . 'Southern AnvewoW' SNWa -SCREE r-0 S30.00 7 80ROEF Bpna4 I Spree PIInO San UPRIGHT W.-a '9itlN VMI S~ OVAL s'-T S17A0 39 'RaniwaKe' N'PMna' SPECIMEN sm. 3 G9WU IYa90 Sun TREE st—, MrEeMiW Trte' im SM" I J A.S— T— 9- SPECIMEN SS To '%beMeA a. Narri9 MEE 37f.99 L (YNhAeI. s Itea S—I.- S wpY ROAN T-W N v 'Iiwy'a Gamey S,— SPECIMEN a8 SP 1 SM " 9 0 Hamama9a VenNOa S-. SUCKEWNO a•Sa 'VamW VAlrlihaN 1 Sh SPECIMEN TA. snm 3 Y-IT SPraa9 T ArtNabphYHos FuOa Pwl ORWNO Grpa13 (BaerEerryl Bun COVER Cover 3I3.00 IS rvauN'Meswchuaseta' EYNryee ZONE: Cl -L,R COMMERCIAL I - LIMITED RETAIL a W ' LOT AREA: 1.9 ACRES — 82,764 SF LOT COVERAGE u � COMMON R.O.W. 7,200 SF 9.6 BUILDING FOOTPRINT 14,080 SF 17.0 % DRIVES a PARKING 39,794 SF 48.0% O GREEN SPACE 21,690 SF 26.2 liV EXISTING PARKING 3: W, 143 SPACES b c PROPOSED PARKING 132 SPACES 1 u� rr■ U a lEPED A9C l r N a 1 Ab. OF NOTE: O TOBER 9, 2017 GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO VEDIMENSIONS R@V ALL DENSIONS ON TDLS DRA W ❑SG PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. s T GENERAL CON"FRACTOR IS TO VERRY ALL SITE Y CONDITIONS PRIOR CONSTRUCTION. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby cWmail, n this f� day o , 20�, a copy of the foregoing public notice for [type of ap ication] k V) [application number], was sent by U.ostage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) aaa 7 ZZ- 6X� ,PY , ✓� /vo'a'6 Dated at ��/�+ tyJ, Ve rmont, ermont, Printed Name: / , Phone number and email: Signature: Date: lzi Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 day of be' , 20 / South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. /-2012 110 southburlungion. PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD- -� office use only) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER(S) OF REC RD (Names assJ39wn on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #) O .-49 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) 5) CONTACT PERSOYfName, mailjpg address, phone and fax 5a) CONTACT EMAIL AD 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: WWI 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) ii 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION y�U I a) General project description (explain what you want approval for): 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com b) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) -a , c) Propose Uses on remain) %j < size of each new use and existi 0 d) Total building square footage on e) Proposed height of building (if applicable) � , and existing f) Number of residential units (if applicabl)e,,new units And existing omits to to torffin) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, tc ExistingYO c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED EN covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) Proposed % Proposed % Proposed —, ON PROPERTY (easements, 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL 2 Sketch Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 It3>9 12) ESTIMATED PR JECT COMPLETION DATE b� 13) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be'to the City at t e t' e of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. f� SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT 1 SIGNATURE OVPROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and fmd it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Sketch Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer RE: 20 Kimball Avenue March 7, 2017 Change of use Dear Ray Belair I am requesting a use change for a section of this building that was built for Digital Equipment in 1981 as an office. (North Section consisting of a 61' x 82' two stories with open parking under.) This site is in a convent location, and as the market for office use is winding down, the intemet has the ability for people to work from home or anywhere in the world. There is a fiber optic network set up in the building, it is in walking distance to Burlington International Airport. The City has developed open area's (parks) close by. Great for walking and biking. Also is on the Chittenden County Bus route. I would like to convert the north section into 10 loft type apartments, ranging from 700 sf to 1000sf, and add a 1800 sf, penthouse to the roof of this section of the existing building. The parking area under this portion of building will be for the tenants parking .Terry Francis Assistant Fire Chief, said it should be sprinkled, since people will be sleeping above. I have approval from the FAA for a penthouse, finalized on February 13, 2017. The upper most elevation (top) for this penthouse will be 369.7 feet above sea level, the average grade at this site is 326.5. I request a variance of 8.2 feet higher than the 35 standard.. The FAA has approved an elevation of 375.00, this will allow for roof solar panels. Also an area on the South, East side of the existing building will be set aside for the residential tenants and there outside activities. Picnics, barbecues, raised bed gardens, etc. This area is now green space and will remain. There is a demand for this type of housing, and my hopes are to have this project set for 2018-2019? Re ards Alan Palmer Mail Processing ,:enter Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Regional Office Obstruction Evaluation Group 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177 Issued Date: 01/04/2017 alan palmer alan palmer \ 5576 dorset street Shelburne, VT 05482 Aeronautical Study No. 2016-ANE-4413-OE ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure: Building penthouse Location: south burlington, VT Latitude: 44-27-37.28N NAD 83 Longitude: 73-09-11.83 W Heights: 331 feet site elevation (SE) .t)� 1 tc--- ) 44 feet above ground level (AGL) 375 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities. Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it is hereby determined that the structure would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s) is(are) met: It is required that FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e-filed any time the project is abandoned or: _X_ At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part 1) _X_ Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460-2, Part 2) See attachment for additional condition(s) or information. Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking/ lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed in accordance with FAA Advise circular 70/7460-1 L Change 1. Any height exceeding 44 feet above ground level (375 feet above mean sea level), will result in a substantial adverse effect and would warrant a Determination of Hazard to Air Navigation. This determination expires on 07/04/2018 unless: Existing culvert 6.5'W x 4.5'H CMP C� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 19, 2005 Alan D. Palmer 5576 Dorset Street Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: 20 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Palmer: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Administrative Officer on December 19, 2005 (effective 12/19/05). Please note the conditions of approval including that you must apply for a zoning permit within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McD nough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Permit Number SP- U �'- 6 CITY OF SOUTH BURI,INGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF on deed, mailing address, phone and fax 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 4-4v r 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) JOY 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) r-7ga.lvP��l ,c �R, b) Proposed Uses on property include description and size of eacP66's ew usS W existing uses to remain) , & c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (prop sed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) J��5 e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing unixs to .remain f) Number of employees & employees): vehicles (exist 'ng and proposed, note office versus non -office `) lt�dm--i(.(65 g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 2a ")L+ Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing % / Z> 'bZ: sq. ft. Proposed, 5 % /�`jn sq. ft. WNW- b) Overall impervious cove age (buildin parking, outside storage, etc) Existing_% / ISD sq. ft. Proposed_% / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing q % / s . ft. ' It7 IL� AeI Proposed % sq. ft. �`' �� v * f' d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ L! b) Landscaping: $ a c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Al 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC fill a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 2 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: b 19 Al 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 611alks P b 534 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SSII�GNATURE APPLICANT L 0, lzllv�s SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: e Complete ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee 4 EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) o Survey data (distance and acreage) o Contours (existing and finished) o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways o Zoning boundaries o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) o Location of septic tanks (if applicable) o Location of any easements o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard o North arrow o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ❑ Site Plan $ 185* ❑ Amended Site Plan $ 185* ❑ Administrative Site Plan $ 85* * Includes $10.00 recording fee 5 No Text CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 25, 2000 Alan Palmer 5576 Dorset Street Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: Site Plan & Conditional Use Applications — 20 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Palmer: Enclosed please find a copy of the July 25, 2000 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, �arah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 25 JULY 2000 Mr. Sipeck of Friendly's suggested another piece of land that is contiguous with the CO Zone. Mr. Llewellyn said this would require a waiver of one parking space. Members were OK with that. 7. Public Hearing: Application #CU-00-17 of Alan D. Palmer seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow 16 hotel rooms in conjunction with 23,900 sq. ft. of general office use, 20 Kimball Avenue, and 8. Site plan application #SP-00-30 of Alan D. Palmer to amend a previously approved site plan for a 32,400 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting 8,500 sq. ft. of general office use to 16 hotel rooms, 20 Kimball Avenue: Mr. Dinklage asked if this would be a permitted use. Mr. Belair said hotels are a permitted use. The reason for the conditional use request is for multiple uses. Mr. Palmer said the rooms would be used for traveling personnel related to the offices use. This is a high tech facility. The Fire Chief has recommended sprinklering the whole building. Mr. Palmer said they have a fire detection system and he would oppose sprinklering. Mr. Schmitt said he wouldn't approve a hotel use without sprinklering. Other members agreed. Mr. Dinklage suggested the applicant talk with the Fire Chief and see if there are other ways to address this concern. Mr. Farley moved to continue the application until 1 August. Mr. Chamberland seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Site plan application #SP-00-31 of Charles and Janet Perkins to amend a previously approved site plan for a 2,125 sq. ft. retail building. The amendment consists of constructing a 1,800 sq. ft. retail use addition for a total of 3,925 sq. ft.,1087 Williston Road: Mr. Lavigne showed the addition to the west of the existing building in what is a parking lot. They will still meet parking requirements. Four trees have been added and they propose four more between the gas station and the shop. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 6, 2000 Alan Palmer 5576 Dorset Street Shelburne, VT 05492 Re: Site Plan & Conditional Use Applications, 20 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Palmer: Enclosed please find a copy of Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on August 1, 2000 (effective date September 5, 2000) as well as the minutes of this meeting. Please note the conditions of approval, including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval will become null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosures DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 AUGUST 2000 4. Continued Public Hearing: Application #CU-00-17 of Alan D. Palmer seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow 16 hotel rooms in conjunction with 23,900 sq. ft. of general office use, 20 Kimball Avenue, and 5. Continued Site Plan application #SP-00-30 of Alan D. Palmer to amend a previously approved site plan for a 32,400 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting 8,500 sq. ft. of general office use to 16 hotel room, 20 Kimball Avenue: Mr. Belair advised that the only issue to be resolved was the sprinklering of the building. Mr. Palmer spoke with the Fire Chief and the Chief agreed to residential type sprinklers in the residential part of the building. Mr. Palmer agrees to do this. Mr. Farley moved the Development Review Board approve conditional use application #CU-00-17 and site plan application #SP-00-30 of Alan Palmer to amend a previously approved site plan for a 32,500 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting 8,500 sq. ft. of general office use to 16 hotel room, 20 Kimball Avenue, as depicted on a two page set of plans, page one entitled "Land Title Insurance Survey for Alan D. Palmer of Office Building Located at 20 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors, dated 11/90, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The site plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three copies of the approved revised site plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance: a. The applicant shall submit details (cut sheets) for the existing lights as well as any new lights. The location of all building mounted lights shall be noted on the plans. All new lights shall be downcasting and shielded and approved by the Director. b. Plans shall be revised to show an additional two parking spaces delineated as handicapped. c. A bike rack must be provided and shall be illustrated on the plans. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 AUGUST 2000 d. The applicant shall revise the plans to illustrate $2,400 of new landscaping and include a planting schedule. e. The plans shall be revised to show the dumpster storage area screened and the type of screening noted on the plans. 3. The Development Review Board approves and additional sewer allocation of 2,600 gpd for a total allocation of 2900 gpd. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee for the additional allocation prior to permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall post a $2,400 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 5. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the building will generate zero additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 6. That portion of the building which will include the hotel rooms shall be sprinklered with a residential type sprinkler. 7. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 9. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. Mr. Chamberland seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public Hearing: Application #CU-00-18 of Goss Dodge, Inc., requesting conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Use, of the So. Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permissia,t to construct a 35'x60' additional and 28'x44' addition to an auto sales and repair facility, 1485 Shelburne Rd., and 7. Site plan application #SP-00-35 of Goss Dodge, Inc, for a 35'x60' addition and 28'x44' addition to an auto sales and repair facility, 1485 Shelburne Rd: 3 I DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 AUGUST 2000 4. Continued Public Hearing: Application #CU-00-17 of Alan D. Palmer seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow 16 hotel rooms in conjunction with 23,900 sq. ft. of general office use, 20 Kimball Avenue, and 5. Continued Site Plan application #SP-00-30 of Alan D. Palmer to amend a previously approved site plan for a 32,400 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting 8,500 sq. ft. of general office use to 16 hotel room, 20 Kimball Avenue: Mr. Belair advised that the only issue to be resolved was the sprinklering of the building. Mr. Palmer spoke with the Fire Chief and the Chief agreed to residential type sprinklers in the residential part of the building. Mr. Palmer agrees to do this. Mr. Farley moved the Development Review Board approve conditional use application #CU-00-17 and site plan application #SP-00-30 of Alan Palmer to amend a previously approved site plan for a 32,500 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting 8,500 sq. ft. of general office use to 16 hotel room, 20 Kimball Avenue, as depicted on a two page set of plans, page one entitled "Land Title Insurance Survey for Alan D. Palmer of Office Building Located at 20 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors, dated 11/90, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The site plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three copies of the approved revised site plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance: a. The applicant shall submit details (cut sheets) for the existing lights as well as any new lights. The location of all building mounted lights shall be noted on the plans. All new lights shall be downcasting and shielded and approved by the Director. b. Plans shall be revised to show an additional two parking spaces delineated as handicapped. c. A bike rack must be provided and shall be illustrated on the plans. 0 8/1/00 MOTION OF APPROVAL ALAN PALMER — 20 KIMBALL AVENUE I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve conditional use application #CU-00-17 and site plan application #SP-00-30 of Alan Palmer to amend a previously approved site plan for a 32,400 square foot general office building. The amendment consists of converting 8,500 square feet of general office use to 16 hotel rooms, 20 Kimball Avenue, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, 'Land Title Insurance Survey for Alan D. Palmer of Office Building Located at 20 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors, dated 11/90, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The site plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three (3) copies of the approved revised site plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a. The applicant shall submit details (cut sheets) for the existing lights as well as any new lights. The location of all building mounted lights shall be noted on the plans. All new lights shall be downcasting and shielded and approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning. b. Plans shall be revised to show an additional two parking spaces delineated as handicapped. C. A bike rack must be provided and shall be illustrated on the plans. d. The applicant shall revise the plans to illustrate $2400 of new landscaping and include a planting schedule. e. The plans shall be revised to show the dumpster storage area screened and the type of screening noted on the plans. 3. The Development Review Board approves an additional sewer allocation of 2600 gpd for a total allocation of 2900 gpd. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee for the additional allocation prior to permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall post a $2,400 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 5. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the building will generate zero (0) additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 6. That the portion of the building which will include the hotel rooms shall be sprinklered with a residential type sprinkler. 7. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 9. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 2 � y 7/25/00 O MOTION OF APPROVAL ALAN PALMER — 20 KIMBALL AVENUE I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve conditional use application #CU-00-17 and site plan application #SP-00-30 of Alan Palmer to amend a previously approved site plan for a 32,400 square foot general office building. The amendment consists of converting 8,500 square feet of general office use to 16 hotel rooms, 20 Kimball Avenue, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Land Title Insurance Survey for Alan D. Palmer of Office Building Located at 20 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Larieure nson Ling Engineers, Inc., dated 11/90, with the following stipulations: f/ 1 61-11.f 5101W. , Alt- 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The site plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three (3) copies of the approved revised site plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a) The applicant shall submit details (cut sheets) for the existing lights as well as any new lights. The location of all building mounted lights shall be noted on the plans. All new lights shall be downcasting and shielded and approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning. b) Plans shall be revised to show an additional two parking spaces delineated as handicapped. c) A bike rack must be provided and shall be illustrated on the plans. d) The applicant shall revise the plans to illustrate $2400 of new landscaping and include a planting schedule. e) The plans shall be revised to show the dumpster storage area screened and the type of screening noted on the plans. 3. The Development Review Board approves an additional sewer allocation of 2600 gpd for a total allocation of 2900 gpd. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee for the additional allocation prior to permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall post a $2,400 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 5. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the building will generate zero (0) additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 6. The entire building shall be sprinklered and have a fire alarm. 7. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 9. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO JULY 25, 2000 MEETING Parking: A total of 260 spaces are required for this project and 254 are proposed which is a six (6) space or a 2.3% shortfall. 7) & 8) ALAN PALMER — EXTENDED STAY SUITES — SITE PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE, 20 KIVIBALL AVENUE This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a 32,400 square foot general office building. The amendment consists of converting 8,500 square feet of general office use to 16 hotel rooms, 20 Kimball Avenue. The Planning Commission previously approved the site plan on February 17, 1981 (minutes enclosed). The property located at 20 Kimball Avenue lies within the C2 District. It is bounded on the north by Merchants Bank, on the west by Kimball Avenue, on the east by the property of Munson Earth Moving, and on the south by the property of John Osgood and Winston Hart. Access/Circulation: Access for the property is provided via a shared 40 foot wide curb cut and a 40 foot wide access drive emanating from 30 Kimball Avenue. Section 26.103(b) of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance prohibits commercial driveways from being more than 36 feet in width. Since the drive is already existing and no changes are proposed, staff does not recommend reducing the width of the drive. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/Setbacks: The current building coverage is 11% (maximum 30%) and the total coverage is 69% (maximum 70%). No changes are proposed. The front yard coverage of the property is 43% (maximum allowed is 30%). While the front yard coverage is exceeded, no changes to the coverages are proposed. Staff recommends that any future alterations to the coverages should address reducing the front yard coverage. Coverages should also be noted on the plans. Setbacks appear to be met. Landscaping_ The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $2,400. This is not being met as no new landscaping has been proposed. The applicant should revise the plans to illustrate new landscaping and submit a planting schedule. Lighting: The applicant should submit cut sheets for the existing lights as well as any new lights. The location of all building mounted lights must be noted on the plans. All lights must be downcasting and shielded and approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning. Parking: The proposed uses require a total of 114 parking spaces, five of which must be delineated as handicapped. A total of 116 parking spaces are provided. Only three parking spaces are marked as handicapped. Plans should be revised to show an additional two parking spaces delineated as handicapped. A bike rack must be provided and should be illustrated on the plans. Sewer: The property currently has a sewer allocation of 300 gpd. The applicant has requested an additional sewer allocation of 2600 gpd for a total allocation of 2900gpd. The applicant should expect to pay a per gallon fee for the additional allocation. 8 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO JULY 25, 2000 MEETING Traffic: The current use is calculated to produce 48 P.M. peak hour vehicle trip ends. The proposed uses will generate a total of 42 P.M. peak hour vehicle trip ends for a 6 vte reduction. Dumpsters: The existing dumpster should be screened and the plans revised to reflect this change. Conditional Use Criteria: The proposed use complies with the stated purpose of Commercial Two District to encourage "general commercial activity". The proposed use will not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities. No affect expected. b) the character of the area affected. No affect expected. c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity. The proposed use is not expected to impact traffic adversely. d) bylaws in effect. The proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations. e) utilization of renewable energy resources. There is no utilization of renewable energy resources to be affected. f) general public health and welfare. No adverse affect expected. 9) CHARLES & JANET PERKINS — 1,800 SO FT ADDITION — VERMONT GIFT BARN - SITE PLAN, 1087 WH LISTON ROAD This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a 2,125 square foot retail building. The amendment consists of constructing a 1,800 square foot retail use addition for a total of 3,925 square feet, 1087 Williston Road. The Planning Commission approved a site plan for this property on April 29, 1997 (minutes enclosed). The property located at 1087 Williston Road lies within the C 1 District. It is bounded on the north by Williston Road, on the east by the Clarion Hotel, on the south by Greer's, and on the west by a convenience store with gas sales. Access/Circulation: Access is currently provided via a 33 foot curb cut on Williston Road and an access to the Greer property to the south. Egress onto Williston Road is right turn only and is so indicated with signage. No changes are proposed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/Setbacks: The approved building coverage is 9% and the total coverage is 78%. The proposed building coverage will increase the building coverage to 11% (30% maximum) and the total coverage will decrease to 66% (70% maximum). The approved DEVELOPMENT RENEW BOARD MEMO AUGUST 1, 2000 MEETING Review Board or the Development Review Board. A sign permit was never issued for these signs. These signs, as they are displayed on the exterior of the building, are illegal signs. b) Revise section 1.C.2. (b) to state that the proposed window signs for Friendly's will be placed on the interior of the windows as required by Section 15 (1) of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. 3. Prior to obtaining a sign permit, all illegal signs, as identified in the Master Signage Plan, must be removed from the property located at 1 Dorset Street. 4) & 5) ALAN PALMER — EXTENDED STAY SUITES — SITE PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE, 20 IGMBALL AVENUE This project was continued from the July 25, 2000 meeting to allow the applicant time to meet with the Fire Chief regarding the sprinklering of the building. Enclosed is staff s 7/25/00 memo for your review. Staff discussed this issue with the Fire Chief who indicated that the building must be sprinklered. 6) GOSS DODGE — TWO ADDITIONS TO AN AUTO SALES & REPAIR FACILITY, 1485 SHELBURNE ROAD This application consists of amending a previously approved site plan. The amendment consists of constructing a 35'x60' addition and a 28'x44' addition to an auto sales and repair facility, 1485 Shelburne Rd. A site plan for this property was previously approved by the Planning Commission on January 14, 1997 (minutes enclosed). Access/Circulation: Access is currently provided by two 20 foot curb cuts on Shelburne Road. The southerly access is for ingress and egress and _the northerly access is for egress only. Access is also provided by a no.w. to Holmes Road. No changes are proposed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/Setbacks: Building coverage is currently 6.3% and is proposed to increase to 7.1% (30% max). Total coverage is currently 32.8% and is proposed to increase to 35.7% (70% max). Front yard coverage is 12.7% and will decrease to 10% (30% max). Setbacks requirements are met. Parking: A total of 66 parking spaces are required and 88 spaces are being provided. Four handicapped parking spaces are required and only two are being provided. Plans should be revised to provide two additional handicapped parking spaces. A bike rack is being provided. Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which would allow this property to generate a maximum of 470 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The property is currently approved for 73.6 P.M. peak vehicle trip ends. The proposed addition will add 19.33 P.M. peak hour trip ends for a total of 92.9 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The applicant should expect to pay a road impact fee for the additional 19.3 vte's. 2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 28, 2000 Alan Palmer 5576 Dorset Street Shelburne, VT 05492 Re: Site Plan and Conditional Use Applications, 20 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Palmer: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 1, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, ,Y Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 21, 2000 Alan Palmer 5576 Dorset Street Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: Site Plan and Conditional Use Applications, 20 Kimball Avenue Dear Mr. Palmer: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 25, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, �Iayrn nd J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: July 25, 2000 agenda items Date: July 20, 2000 1) Alan Palmer - 20 Kimball Avenue - Site Plan and Conditional Use The entire building should be sprinklered and have a fire alarm 2) John Larkin - 1 Dorset Street - Sketch Plan Acceptable 3) South Burlington Realty - 368 Dorset Street - Final Plat the proposed buildings should be sprinklered and have fire alarms 4) Charles and Janet Perkins - 1087 Williston Road - Site Plan Acceptable MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: July 25, 2000 Agenda Items Date: July 20, 2000 VERMONT LAND SURVEYORS OFFICE BUILDING, KIMBALL AVENUE Site plans dated November 1990 prepared by surveyor Mark Ward are acceptable. VERMONT GIFT BARN, WILLISTON ROAD Site plan prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere Architects dated 6/14/00 are acceptable. HOWARD JOHNSON HOTEL - DORSET STREET - WILLISTON ROAD Site plan showing connecting drive prepared by Llewellyn - Howley dated 7/7/00 is acceptable. SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY - DORSET STREET Site drainage is being checked and if needed shall be controlled before it discharges into the Dorset Street system. c?IW4.7770A' Or ORA/NAQ`' D i 15" r—' CMP - - D I D cO"-,--a ----- — — CONTROL STRUCTURE PARK/ANO AREA �� I I I I I I I I N 52 78 302E r' E,nsnNc S MAI✓HLNE J d7 n, FOOTING ANO ROOF LhVA/N Z S/.7F A /( ' 80.6' W - 5 'SETBACK D� PARK/US AREA S' 38pp�pp17:3G'E LryCJU.: G' ' 30' SE ->BACK — 60' . �1. FL 0014S I D ` i 15' 1J' 20 !(IMBALL A PEN!/E OFFICE BU/LOINO .3 FL 00195 -------- CAS SEn'Y/CE sz -Roo -----� RETA/N/NC WA#L.L I lL ENTRANCE -_1_, Z UNgEROfYx/N9 S IELEPHOWE EX7snNC PA�4'�/h'G ARFA SIG El3JAtK MAIL N ,3747 oo"dY _ c 2X8.70 f£RMOV7 OAS S) 5',TM_S 1NC------- I AL F.O,—FIBER O°71L L.'NE 1a'w T KIfB,4LL 14 !VENUE —5 —I - s -- s - — — s --- CRAPKC SCALE I 0 PO 40 60 60 100 1J.9'ALr s, E hS MANNCXE E'Ot 1E OF PA kFYI-NT T 1 PUMP CAS SERWCC 0 STATION _ S 52�850"GY -- >E crgR c. O. ^„LEARA.UCF 70 CUAR:J RAILS z Q9'.4pa 6d94EN MO Wr4IN rPO�FR -EX/S77NC UNOEROPOUNO ELFC7771C -- SHU7&7 PLYNT 6F BEGINNAVC O CERTIFICATION LOGE 700' RIGHT OF WAY / LFRnrY 70 ALAN O. PALMER AND C1N17F0 OF ONAYA LIFF INSURANCE CO4/PANY THAT THIS PLAT /.S BASED UPON A F/[LD SU1RkFY, EX/S77NG F/ELO E11 FNar DEED RES1r,4h'QV A a OS7) TOTAL S r4 POV COV7ROL 7R,4WR5'_'; PRENCXIS AIRLgY Or " BUS/NFS.S DARY( WORTH' AS N07M ABOPF AND 1NF WNAnOV SCPPL/EO BY ALAN PALMER. MARK V: WARD I ED dUN ® 8 2000. GENER9L NOTES So. Burling,on 1. THIS MI'AI. STA77OV WRWY WAS PERFORMED IISDUG A CFCD/MF7EA' 4,?0 SA 7.7 1 TOTAL STAn01✓ EL.FC7RcW10 7W'Xa17F / f7�1 A aE6VAT 400 DATA (UZFC16W- )NIS IAT &A NT CONTAINS A 4711AI AX/.S CO'APENSA?W AND A117WA770 CORRErAW FOR COLL/V f7,7ON ERR6W 7Hf,)?0 ORE 7HE AIVC!ESORY 7'✓RIVIO atla ON Ah' ANCUZAR ERRCW PER S,7d 170V OF ? SK-CrAVS PFR STAPOY. IN ALL 07HER RESPEC75 nf/S AIFWV SIIB.ST,4A'nALL Y WE7S 7NE R,6W1REMEN7; Or A CLASS "A " SVWWI 'AS DEFINED BY Th'E M/N/MC/M STAN'04 ''V DE7A/L REOU/REMEN7S Fi Yi' AN ALTA/ACSN LAND RILE- S/RkFY. -' AS7'ER /7F NA77OV4 ROW INSURANCE PROGRAM 11 n✓E CITY OF S'aIN HIJRL/NC1ON PRMOVr, COMMJN/TY PANEL NUMBER 5MI95 0a3 OAMV J-16-61 -9y0; l-, LONE -4 /70W HAZARDS F4070RS NOT LL<TFRMINFO, THIS PRL)''FRIY' IS .NOT IN 7HE fO? YEAR /70 ;O AREA j NO ,fdZ&VV7S Ft' Nj9 FOR VaIPES OV70 7H1.S PROPERTY. 4 OFFO fM C77Y Or SYX✓77/ hMINC7ZLV OF K/MBALL AN-rNUF IS allot lw'AiM DEED ifs:. 4M PG 429 041F2' 6- 1.977 ,,tpcw Y£RMQN7 OEPAR7MENT O` N1C41WAY5 70 CY7Y OF SIYJIH BURL/NGraV &7- AI PARM.5' NQ 1,2A2B iA,Jfi 4.L ANO 49AS .5)$V#N OV 104CL-S 44 A/✓O 6 OF PLANS CF h!CJ N 4Y PRt2ECT SUU7H BURLLNCTQN M S2(/7,J. 5 iWE PARKIM0 -T-Aq- RE4YIIRENENT /S OUF (V PFR ?50 SOUARE FEFT OF- NET Or-77CE SJPAa' )NIS LLWTA/NS J?, 4X SOUARE FEET aF NET ..VACr 00h16)y RE(X/7RES fJ(J SJPA47S THE 707AL PARK/NC SPACY- AREA S 1.,0 SPAC.1rS tt TNF IiRO 7 Or 7VC BUILLYNO /S 27' -A- OV THE STREET S✓DE. 77/E a rY REiWIREMEN.r 7. )NI.S 65;1'/NOARY' .5'URL£Y /S NOT 70 BE LY.IVSTRUFO AS A aiP17F70,477OV O`- 177LE 70 THE F'hIPERIY S /gNA/. 77ZF .pla.JL0 BF YALi0AW BY 77TLr- OgVlaV Or A C&WRFTFNT 14T70?NE} AT LAK' OV 7HE 8A.575 OF HIS / HER RFSFARCYl' Or 7HE PU6Y/C LAND RECORDS LEGAL 0SSCBIPTI0)V OF PROPERTY P1?0°ER7Y BE/NO AWOOOV AS NUMBER ?G KINBALL AVENUE AND /.S LOCATED OV Pit' EASTRL Y S70E CSC' KIMBAU AWA141F IN ME CITY Or SOUTH RMAY NOMV OF OK//77FNLF-h' CCXINTY /N n/E S7A7F L7F LgiS'MOVT ANO RUING AVRZIER DESCRIBED AS f2XL0057 BFC✓NN/NC AT AN IRON PIRF SET IN THE W'PO✓A/D MAhW7NC 77/E N6l47NiorS7' CORNFR CL'' LOT NUM5E;p F7lg- g) OLf1VEO BY ✓YWIV OS6VW AND WNS7Ov HART AND B zma 7-Is- .St71%Plmr-.S'T C6WA,rR Or L.SAID P/r'E dWINC CW rHF EA.STFA Y EDOF CY 7HE IX f770T R/CNT a-- WAY LIMIT Qc A511WBALL AVENUE. 7HEANCE PROC2°E<hNC CW A BEARING OF N J7W Gb W ALOVO 771E FAS)F,% Y' r,9Qr l'W 77-IE' R/CWT CJF' WAY" LG4/T OF K/A&,4U A{£NUE A 9157ANCC Car 28670' FFET 70 .41V /RCYV R/PE' n✓E jZMIM9 SAiO PIRA- 6Lr7NC A 6YSTANCt' O 179 B7' FFET 51�[/7T✓ERL Y Or ii/E F10 Or 1HE R16)117'OF WAY LIMI.r Or KEhiVEDY OR/Y£, SA/O P/PE 9,c1N0 ALSO AT .WE SIX/7YAFST CORNER ar LOT NU1 WR S-`i,N (V ONW-0 BY niE MEA YYANTS BANK. P4FVr-r Pft%Fr'0/N4r aV .4 BrARINO 01rN .527,q."T A101AP THE SOU7HERL Y BCVA1DARY Or LOT NCWLIFR SEVFN -V A 0/STANCE 0- 28a 5J' FEET 70 AN IRQV P/F1r SET IN 77IF -RaINO 47 7HF ,VOWHEA.ST t-*?NfR OF LOT N1,4(bFR SY.Y (6) HEREIN OFSMIdW,0 ,W,fNCE' PROCEEL)1NC OVA BEAIWNG Oar S J947:702 ALOVC 7HE L4fS7ERi Y BDUVOARY' Or MP:W.SOV EAR7H MONNC A LYSTANCE O< 2Btt7B' fEE.r 70 AN IROV PFE' FOUVO. Tt/ENCE p9"y-TYA'O OVA ArAftYNC OF' S .`271iNO *W ALOVG IHE NO77H RaNDARY CE LOT A#,WbrR 77LW- (5) A 01SrANa- QF 2LR5:12' FEET TO AN IA12V f?/P£ SET IN JW r OROr/ND BE/1" 7H,c' PON7 Cdr IiCgNNWO Or INIS SORW y AS S11001V OV SWT7' OVE (1) PA'4rhX'7Y Bc%NC LOT NUMhrR SA' (6j AS SHOM/ ON PLAN Or 2WWA'ESS PARK' NORTH" BY 0141 EiVaV0.W1N(,' ASZYVARES Or WFLht1R1Vr 4EFN/6V7 AND DATED AUGUST /9149 AS PROJECT NUM96N 77154 Cir RE'CYJRD IN LYX. &%.X Pr. 71 OF THE CYTY OF S0117H 8I/RLIN0722V LAND RE-CY.bPi'S. SWO LOT NIIMBFR .0- (6) aNrA/NS 9.f TX SVJARE FEE7 QP 1.dB ACRES: fi9a0,F,PTY 817N0 ALL THE S4Ae 7N47' WAS LVM" AN0 4'Y>/✓WM-0 TO ALAN' D. PALMER /,V LYX. 171, Pr 444 LAND TITLE INSIIRA.NCE SURVEY ALAN V. PA ,P? CIF 097Lz-RUIZO/NG LOC4&V ,, T 20 K/MBALL AV£NU4 SL.I'l7H BURZING76W, WRMONT. VERMONT LAND SURVEYORS 4050 WIU ISTON RD. SO. BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05403 DATE HOLE-MBER 1990 SURVEYED r ZIW1EUX, A. LAMBERT bF - PROJECT DRAWN A. LAMBERT - 9092 ShFE7 2 lfr 2 CHECKED MARIr K WARD CALCULATED MARK a WARD n _ 1,9 67, ?� I GENERAL NOTES 1. PROPERTY BEING' L.OT NUMBER 6 AS SHOGYNPLAN OF SURREY ENT/TLED " FINAL PLAN BUSINESS PARK NORTH" BY CIVIL EAICINEER/NC ASSOCIATES y OF SI/FL8URN£, NERMONT, AND DATED AUGUST 1978.AS PRO✓FCT 77154 OF RECORD IN VOL.. 15.E 106 71 OF THE C/T'Y Or* S01171-1 9URZIN07ON LAND I RECORDS. ?. /L1A6NF170 NORTH TAKFN FROM SAID PI' AN TO AB011E. � J T//E- PER/METER PROPERTY LINES AND RELATED INFORMATION W RE CAL CULATED FROM A CL OSED TOTAL S7A 17ON IRA - kERSE W711 A RELA77Pf - ERROR OF CZ OSURE RA770 BFINC 1 PART /N 89000. 0 4. 171E BUILD//'✓G S110MV ON L_ OT NO. 6 CONTAINS THREE FL OORS. THE GROSS SOUARF FOOTAGE FOR THE FIRST FL OOR IS 10278 THE RFM.A/N/NG SECOND AND THIRD A OORS CONTAIN 14, 561 EACH FOR A TO rAL OF 39, 400 SQUARE FFFT. 5 PROPERTY/5 LOCATED IN THE 6 0,44MER6%AL // ZONE AND MEETS. THE SETBACK REOU/REMENTS OF SAID ZONE. 6. A10 APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS 7. SEE SHFET NUMBER 2 FOR EX- ,g ,'ENDED DETAILS AND U71ZI776-S d' —_ _ LEGEND - PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE -- RIGHT-OF-WAY LIMIT ® SET HOLLOW METAL PIPE AND CAP @ RECOVERED HOLLOW METAL PIPE O CALCULATED POINT E\T ELECTRIC/TELEPHONE UTILITY LINE i EXISTING TREE 7;( EXISTING HYDRANT ❑ CATCH BASIN v EXISTING UTILITY x EXISTING GATE VALVE EXSTING GUARD RAILS qc EXISTING LIGHT POLE 6. 0' ORALNAGE _ EASEMENT -1.1 32 "F kVZ. 14fl, /'0 485 F,�i' LOT NUMBER 6,J I • I I:I I.1 I:I I•I ' I:I PARKING ARr.4 I I • I I:I ti I•I i I:I I -I I;I I.1 LO.r 7 THE ffERCH,4ATS BANK OFf7CE HU/!O/NC 275 KENNEDY' OR1VF VOL. 146 PG. .roe N 5278 280.; r,RA.<sF0 /SLAN� N J7 41 AXWLL AVENUE 0 EDGE OF WAY � to O 1= � 1 1 01 y 15.0' PELc:S7R/4N FA-SFMF.NT SEE W,,Z. 211, PG I&F PROPERTY O/- VU)VSON K4RTX Jf0kZN6! ti VOL. BfI, P6 ,360 15..0' PFOES7R14N EASEMENT SEE' Pa. 211, PG. 18,F --------------------------------------f----------- MAIL a PARK/NC AREA i i PARKING AREA I 0 o �. 0�-- i o -----J c LOT 6 AAr." D. P.fLMM 20 !r1Y8,4LL AVENUE VOL. 171 PG. 444 -� 188 AC. j 1 AREA=B7, BOO SOUAhr" FEET J —�S 1 PARK/NG AREA 4440' 1?/0H7 OF {YAY 70 LOTS %6,7 AND 11 FVS71N6' S1LFWALK SibV2'1O E- PARK/NC AREA o L OT .5 h o j ma's ✓omv H. OSCOOD 410 J 07AZTVAr )r HART JO K/rf&ALL A�VIUE VOL. 220, PG. 91 PARK/NO AREW PLYNT (f� &7QNNING �--- �E JESC/?/P71GYV GDP' SLiRIEY .4CLE•SS P2 LOTS 467ANO 11 O I -- fTiYN/ K/MBALL d kFNUZ- � 1OO' ''O •S"IL/NrG�E ROAD` JUN 0 ts zuuu of So. Burlington LOT 71 - f -- -- -- --� AL TA /AGSM / L4✓YD TJ 1—p lNS&w"r.�' SURIYEY BENCHMARK !S rOw OF BgNNFT 1 BGLT oN HYDRANT Rl-l1Al10N I - JJ0..75' U..£ OAT✓M 1 GRAPH/C SCALE O 4U 80 120 160 x0 CERTIFICATION / CERTIFY TO ALAN O. PALMFR AND U41/7F0 6r 6WAHA L/FF /NSVRANq CWRANY )VAT 7H/S PLAT /S BASED UPON A f7EL0 SY/RfFY, EX/SANo FIELD E-NL�-NLY; GEED RESEAROV A aO.5rV TOTAL STAP(N C61V7ROL 7R.4IERSF PREI'10l/.S' Sl/RkEY 0 - ' BUSINESS PARK N0R7N' AS NOTED ABOI& ANO 141FORMA770N SUPPL/FO 8Y ALAN PALMER. M. ARK V. {YARD FOR ,4L41V P. PALAW? OF 0'?76E- BU/LO7NG LOCATED AT AV o0k MLL A4£NUE, S0117H SURUN0,7W WRmLLYT. VERMONT LAND SURVEYORS 4050 WMUSTON RD. SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 DATE — N0kf;W9ER 1990 SURVEYED T. Z,6A11EU.Y, A. LAMBERT ✓R. PROJECT DRAWN A. LA1W8ER7'✓R 9092 CHECKED .4o'41?K V RIARU CALCULATED A.LAMBERT AYEFT 1 Of 2 f;i u f4 er vc-e A_ Ti�- Pl Q F- Moto � j r � I u� I I FF�44 e,-E uew aP lzll Llb 2 Y:JV A e- ,J% f-6 Houey r_/AOUUT&ILl A-SH 7­ ------- y ------- ------ :5 F uew V MT. A4H --------- t9j6H w" Tle r,[Fp,' F-V.j as \41 4-LAFIL, L C-a ILL _)L E9Tv-..-,u -rom-Aer.la 7% eaJ,I( ZA TRASO ld -5' E!:=A�47Q.. L 6A�:.IPE5Z .,,,4ou uLrZi�.4­ I z- vip-0 I I V.JH'Ttr t"104H an,"..e6y I *. - 4, 4:;z_p4v_ 4,14, - iliz-V HOUSq 1,0Ue-p Id'- I(.-' 1 =,,It-4" Cir-Ae5 APPLE -1 I,qi 3­54e f5ueUiw6 eU,5►4 zd*- !.Or I u 0 L42r 4& %-J W I T �L, A.: ., r— Jowe-?Zq .8r — <)r I e, W ; 4 6 HY12EA U'r Fell v 10 L-�-r .495A 1A 44ost? = al-164 -e;,Q. Fr. 5Xl,5rlQdx a-C;6%. F-oOTFIOWT ex?d?a 4 VAOL-_lKJ6 4o z 5o 5.F-' ft,l I.- --*100 up. rT GIT411 1217 llexitY RECEIVED DEC 16 2005 City of So. Burlington A <24ZcL.4Qrl F:Lli:747V WCOH-r4 -ETlZL:F_-r L&H-r PAeC.4L1G —,, I vu 4) — s, alliela -1:26 Fjo. 1W - si o•+ Dr JtfN 0 b 2000_ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR r � SITE PLAN REVIEWOf All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being ; ejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECQRP (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) cm-s—a n L N�& ' /, AA,C--- 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) :j0 M & 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) - Ca M1' 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: W 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0980-060W 1 C 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) �1 O-KO vp 3 V/0L 5,E b) Proposed! Uses (include descri ticn anV size of each n w use and a isting uses to remain) ��;1 S�T�o �.s i Q12- A1D211 c) Total building square footageew(pprop�os�e�d buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of 'wilding & number offloors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to rerr.ain, specify if basement and mezzanine) jj g S I A81 7 '7 I a) Naamberof desidentipWnits (if applicable,, new units and existing units to remain) J4)5�r� J',11�S ✓ '' ll f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): �D<D 21� � g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed Ja % b) Overall (building, parking, gutside storage, etc) Existing °J Proposed �� m % 4:n:i ,I.b7Ii ��6Grn8°c) Fryar a ong eac street �sting,� °Jo Proposed /o 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ St' j-b i b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC ,tip � �� a) Average daily traffic (in and out): 5b �,�� b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): "� � �t c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): 1N° �T� �'$w ( Lb) 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: �mg; 9 41-� ; &> �6-�!1,) ( 7,bb- ? -L2) 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application flee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certifij that ail the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line BATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: [�_ Development Review Board 11 Director, Planning & .Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: (Apfrmsp) Complete 0 Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. 'Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. • Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) • Survey data (distance and acreage) ® Contours (existing and finished) Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations a Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping • Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways • Zoning boundaries 3 dumber and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning reguiations) • Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) • Location of septic tanks (if applicable) Location of any easements • Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard • North arrow • Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date • Exterior lighting details (must be down casting and shieided) • Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the .zoning regulations If Restaurant is proposed, ,provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION PEE No New Application $ 60.00* ® Amendment $ 35.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee (Apfrmsp) �JQ 162, i� 1 16, / t ?6'* �I�e_s !s 5-1 � I I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RE ORD (name, address, phhone # Al 6 Va � iniky 4t& �n IrA-) tI 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: K„�,i►1 5) LOT NUMBER (if 6) PROPOSED USE(S) 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # un' , aximum height and # floors, squa a feet per floor) `,� 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEE ')7 ink ) �t�l �hl� C3 1 1)6� 9) LOT COVERAGE: building landscaped areas __% building, parking, outside storage% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ �" , Landscaping Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: t:.t"p- M9 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) o Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION :1. 0 4M BltVJM PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: DATE OF SIBMISSION DATE OF HEARING SFGNATURE OF APPLICANT PLEASE SUBMIT FOUR COPIES OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION vLot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible.) \'Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. I. Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways. v Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as, required. Number and location of compact car spaces. ( This requires separate Planning Commission approval). X�Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces) Location of septic tanks (if applicable). �\J Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot #). North arrow. Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. 2 71 1 i •. City of South Burlingtonr Application to Development Review Board Jet- ®� 200U. Name of applicant(s) rite of So, Burlington n t, Official Use APPLICATION # HEARING DATE FILING DATE FEE AMOUNT Address Telephone # Represente Landowner Location and description of property t9ka2 ll 14-:� &Z-A dK� f )k� ' Adjacent property owner(s) & Address Type of application check one: ( ) appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals : ,>m Notice of Violation) `-6 request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Provision of zoning ordinance in question Reason for appeal Other documentation J,w 7, Z060 Date SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE Signature In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, , at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Application of seeking a from Section of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to ,40 ,-PUBLIC HEARIN SOUTH BURLINGTf DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlingt n Development Rev' w oard will hold a blic h n at the Bur- lingto all Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday July 25, 2000, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the fol- [owing: 11 Application #CU-00- 17 of Alan D. Palmer seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.65. Multiple Struc- tures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Re quest is for permission to allow 16 hotel rooms in conjunction with 23,- 900 square feet of gen- eral office use, 20 Kim- ball Avenue. 21 Final plat application of John Larkin, Inc, to amend a preuiousiy ap- proved planned unit de- velopment consisfin� of constructing an add Lion to an existing hotel build- ing and a new 71 room hotel building on a site developed with an 89 room hotel and 275 seat restaurant. The amend- ment consists of revising the exterior materials for the new hotel building, 1 Dorset Street. 31 Final plat application #SD-00-32 of South Bur- lington Realty Company to amend a planned unit development consisting of: 11 a 4800 square foot building consisting of 3,- 600 square feet of con- venience store use and a 1200 square foot fast food restaurant with twent�r two f221 seats, and 21 an 8.50 square foot building consisting of 3500 square feet of generat office use and 4560 square feet used for a multiple number of commercial uses for a multiple number of ten- ants. The amendment consists of: 11 con- structing an 8,944 square foot building [phase 11, 21 con- s t r u c .t i n g a 13,640 square foot building [phase 21, and 31 approval to use the two [21 existin buildings and the two [2! new buildings for a multiple number of commercial uses for a multiple number of ten- ants, 364. 366 and 368 Dorset Street. John Dinklage. Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board July 8, 2000 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 October 10, 1986 Alan Palmer 4050 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 20 Kimball Avenue and lot #1, Kimball Avenue Dear Alan: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo for your two site plan applications. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 14, 1986 to represent your request. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls '�§vutb -431 urtington -fire Department ; 575 Borset -treet .3vutn Nurlington, Vermout 954111 x OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802)658-7960 MEMORANDUM TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: October 14,1986 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: October 8,1986 1. Town & Country Furniture Addition Shelburne Road The plans have been reviewed by this department and the following should be required for fire protection; A. The road and parking area in the back of the building must be no less then 30' Wide to enable us to get equipment set up. B. Because of Shelburne Road being a main highway at least one hydrant should be installed on the property . 2. Lot #6 20 Kimball Avenue Plamer LTD. Plans reviewed and at this time I do not see a problem for the department. 3. Pizzagalli Development Co. 35 Joy Drive The only problem I see at this time is with the size of the two buildings and being tied together one hydrant is needed and the property for the new building. 10/14/86 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Palmer Company for a 9,600 square foot addition to the existing building at 20 Kimball Avenue as depicted on a plan entitled "Lot #6, Professional Offices, Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Palmer Company, LTD, dated 9/29/86 with the following stipulations: 1) An $8,200 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. The plans shall be revised to show landscaping valued at this amount. It shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to permit. .�) The building permit shall 'be obtained within 6Mmonths or this p � is approval is null and void. �� � s.e.,� ���a � ate• �� ; MEMO-WJS 10/10/86 8) BDP REALTY, INTERPRETIVE DATA SYSTEMS, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. This lot is part of the original National Life subdivision approved by the City Planning Commission. This plan called for a service road along Shelburne Road, part of which has been built, tieing into Holmes Road extension. The intersection of Holmes Road with Shelburne Road will be signalized. This will improve access and exiting for this development. 2. A strip along the north boundary, 24 feet at Shelburne Road and 67 feet at Green Mountain Drive should be reserved for Holmes Road extension. 9) ALMER COMPANY, 20 KIMBALL AVENUE 1. O.K. it seems to be a good utilization of space. 2 Date Received By Date Application ImpleteGand Received By By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIE,, 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record (b) Applicant Person(c) Contact .. r 2) PROJECT STRi,LT ADDRESS J 3) PROPOSED USE(S) I VC)bn 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., # of units, floor area, etc.) _ 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) -�� C`/' ✓ C� — 6) COST EST321ATES: (a) Buildings 06&4 ,a (b) Landscaping -��!� �) �-fi6CV (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) 7) ESTII-L-.TED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE _ A�y4L �q-1R>t 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) (� 9) P OAK HOUR (S) OF OP ER AT ION 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION .J DATE S IGNATU:IX, OF :.PPLICANT A 1 wit. "k a 1. 50 Wes• I yr 4`n cl Wf" t 45.4` b -�V," .60 4 bvirwri5bvsk -7, " l r�c.dl 00►.1�.. � � , � I January 25, 1984 Mr. Alan Plainer 4050 Williston Road South Burlington, W 05401 Re: 20 Kimball Avenue Dear Alan: Be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission has denied your request to construct phase II of your office complex over the maximum height permitted. Also be advised that phase II must be started no later than June 1, 1984, other- wise you will lose the sewer allocation. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call xxie. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer rM/mCg M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 1/20/84 2) Brosseau-Williams, Seasonal Aoua Park, lots 1-2, Gregory & Daughers, Industrial Park Zoning Board of Adjustment granted conditional use approval on January 3, 1984. Proposed is to occupy lots 1 & 2 of Gregory Industrial Park, corybination of lots total 3.7 acres. As a requirement of the Act 250 permit a deceleration lane from the entrance to the crest of the hill must be constructed. Blinking warning sign at the top of the hill and at the botom of hill warning of the entance must be installed. Fire Chief Goddette wants the fire hydrant on Williston Road which was removed to be replaced anywhere between the entance and Bill Szymanski's house. Cost of improvements (deceleration lane, curbs and road) estimated at $60.000. Two curb cuts are proposed, suggest that the first curb be designed to prevent left turning movements, plus provide oneway traffic flow. Entrance should be signed. Southerly opening should be a minimum of 24 feet wide to allow two way movements. Sewer alloc- ation for entire industrial park is 2000 g.p.d. with 300/400 g.p.d. estimated for proposed use. Traffic impact 80 trips a week day and 220 trips weekends, these are estimated numbers. See City Engineer's comments. 3) Alan Palmer, Phase II, office complex, 20 Kimball Avenue Planning Commission granted extension of phase II to June 1, 1984. Planning Commission may grant an increase in height of a structure according to Section 18.112 of Zoning Regulations. Additional story will provide 3780 square feet of floor area. Dimensional requirements must be increased, see sub section c of Section 18.112. Required and existing dimensions are as follows: existing minimum required setback 78' 40' rear yard 80' 30' side yards south side - 80' 15' north side - 81' Proposed overall height is 44 feet Should Planning Commission consider the required, a motion of approval is all that is necessary. Planning Commission may want to tie this to a building start of no later than June 1, 1984. 4) Green Moutain Power Request is a subdivision of the original lot #17 of National Life subdivision. Total lot size being 13.2 acres. Lot #1 will contain 8.7 acres and will be the Green Mountain Power lot. Lot #2 will contain 4.5 acres will be underveloped at this tine. August 16, 1983 .......................... page 5 Request from Palmer CompanyLtd., for extension of Phase II Permits on Office Building, 20 Kimball Avenue After a brief discussion Mr. Jacob moved to extend the sewer allocation on the office building, 20 Kimball venue until June 1, 198 Mrs. Maher seconded with unanimous approval. Report from City Planner on Zoning Amendments Concerning his report (attached), Mr. Spitz said he felt most strongly about Item I, which is not in the Commission's juris- diction. Mrs. Hurd said she was concerned with the taxation of open land. Mr. Spitz said that would come up next spring or earlier. Mr. Poger noted that the State says the land has to be taxed at its highest and best use. Mr. Jacob said the highest and best use is farmland. Mr. Burgess said the highest and best use is.what the land is zoned at. Regarding traffic, Mr. Spitz said the main idea is to be careful about the use of existing buildings. Regarding Shelburne Road, he felt that the by-pass might not have to go as far as proposed, possibly only to Holmes Road. Mr. Poger noted that when the road is widened, there will be more and more attempts to develop that land. Mr. Spitz said he felt four lanes were more needed south of Green Mountain Drive. Mr. Poger said he was worried about what will happen when the Southern Connector comes in. Mr. Spitz replied that when Shelburne Road construction begins, there will be such a mess that a new bond issue might just pass. Other Business Mr. Burgess moved that the Commission express its thanks to David Spitz for the effort he has expended in the City's behalf. The motion was seconded and unanimously approved. The next meeting of the Planning Commission will be on Tuesday, September 6, 1983. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:10 pm. Clerk DHS 2/17/81 STIPULATIONS For the Site Paln Application of Alan Palmer for a 25,704 square foot office building in the Business Park North subdivison as de- picted on a plan entitled "Lot 6, Professional Offices, Kimball Avenue," dated 2/4/81, prepared by Palmer Company Ltd: Stipulations: 1) The applicant shall provide an offer of dedication for the 15 foot wide pedestrian easement prior to issuance of a building permit. 2) A landscaping bond, equal to 30 of the cost of building construction, shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. Acceptable landscaping information shall appear on the revised site plan. 3) Parking spaces shall be a minimum of 180 square feet (9'x20'). 4) The revised site plan shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 5) Approval for phase I expires in 6 months. Approval for Phase II expires in 18 months. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next Week's Agenda Items Date: 2/5/81 Because of the.short work week, my reviews of these two new site plans are incomplete. More information will be available (hope- fully) at Tuesdays meeting. Don't forget to go to the new building. (2) South Burlington Realty, Williston Road Property is in an industrial zone. Access must be shared with adjacent property. Zoning ordinance requires 266 parking spaces (1 per 100 square feet for a warehouse), far in excess of what is actually needed. Applicant has shown 23 proposed spaces and additional parking areas if needed. Landscaping information is incomplete. 3) Palmer, Kimball Avenue Property is in recently subdivided Business Park North immediately adjacent to the corner property owned by the bank. Shared access points, as previously required, have been included. Zoning ordinance requires 128 parking spaces (1 per 200 square feet for an office building). Applicant has shown 108 spaces. Landscaping information is incomplete. Palmer Kimball Avenue One of the main issues in this site plan is also the required number of parking spaces. The ordinance requires 1 per 200 square feet but allows a 50% variance. The ICV buildings, which are often cited as having insufficient parking, show approximately 1 space per 450 square feet. This applicant shows 108 spaces, slightly more than 1 space per 250 square feet, which should be more than adequate. Also see last week's memo. ��r �� ..���=� �� �� � ��� 'a. a � �L.�'�� // -�' � � �� � � .��. FORM 901 V'F:RNP )VI - 11 ARRANT Y DEED REV. 9/80 TUTTLE LAW PRINT. PU B�IS `IE RS RUiI AN p� VT Orj7�1 we, DANIEL J. O'BRIEN and LEO O'BRIEN, both Of South Burlington and State of Vermont in the County Of Chittenden Grantor s , in the consideration of - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TEN AND MORE- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DO liars paid to our full satisfaction by ALAN D. PALMER Of Shelburne and State Of Vermont freely (6ijjP, (6rant, ALAN D. PALMER, in the County Of Chittenden Grantee , by these presents, do Lowaq anb Tonfirm unto the said Grantee, and his heirs and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A vacant lot of land containing 1.88 acres, more or less, situated on the northerly side of Industrial Park Road (now Kimball Avenue), being all of Lot 6 as shown on a Plan of Land entitled "Final Plan, Business Park North, Civil Engineering Associates, Shelburne, Vermont, August 1978, Project Number 77154" of record in Volume 153, at Page _71 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said lot is described therein as follows: Beginning at the point marking the intersection of the northerly sideline of Kimball Avenue and the southerly terminus of the common boundary line between Lot 6 and Lot 7; thence northerly on a bearing N52°18'47"E for a distance of 280.53 feet to a point; thence turning to the right on a bearing S38°47'30"E for a distance of 288.78 feet to a point; thence turning to the right on a bearing S52°18'47"W for a distance of 286.12 feet to a point, which point marks the intersection of the northerly sideline of Kimball Avenue and the southerly most extension of the common boundary line between Lot 6 and Lot 5; thence proceeding to the right on a bearing N37°41'13"W for a distance of 288.70 feet to the point or place of beginning. Being a portion of the lands and premises which Daniel J. Millham conveyed to Leo O'Brien by Warranty Deed dated September 9, 1944 of record in Volume 13, at Page 590 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, and being a portion of the lands and premises which were decreed to Leo O'Brien, Jr. and Daniel John O'Brien (the herein Grantors) by Decree of Distribution, Estate of Leo O'Brien, Probate Court, District of Chittenden, dated September 30, 1958 and of record in Volume 48, at Page 45 of the said Land Records. Said premises are subject to and have the benefit of a right of way for ingress and egress from Kimball Avenue over and upon the 40 foot right of way as shown on said Plan of Land. Said right of way shall be used in common by the owners of Lot 5, Lot 6, Lot 7, Lot 8, and Lot 11, and their heirs and assigns. The cost of all main- tenance, repair, and replacement of the right of way, once constructed, shall be apportioned between the then owners of Lot 5, Lot 6, Lot 7, and Lot 11 once con- struction begins, as follows: A. For so much of the right of way as lies within the boundary of Lot 5 and is used as a common entrance to the easterly boundary of Lot 6, each will bear one- fourth (1/4); and B. For so much of the right of way as lies westerly of the easterly boundary of Lot 6, to the most westerly portion of the driveway or service road constructer upon Lot 6, Lot 6 and Lot 7 shall each bear one-half (1/2); and X C. For so much road constructed ght of way as lies wester 6, Lot 7 shall bear all t y or service ; and D. For so much of the right of way as lies easteriy`o he :common entrance on Lot 5, to the most easterly portion of the driveway oi-s;ervice-road constructed upon Lot 5, Lot 5 and Lot 11 shall each bear one-half (1/2); and,. E. For so much of the right of way as lies easterly of the most easterly portion of the driveway or service road constructed upon Lot 5, Lot 11 shall bear all the remaining cost. The standard of maintenance for said right of way shall be its original condition, once constructed, save aesthetically acceptable and nonfunctional wear and tear. The maintenance obligations expressed in the foregoing paragraph shall be enforceable in an action at law with the prevailing party entitled to court costs and a reasonable attorneys fee. This conveyance is specifically subject to the following: 1. Motion of Approval, South Burlington Planning Commission, dated May 23, 1978, and Memorandum to South Burlington Planning Commission from O'Brien Brothers to Bruce Houghton, Engineer, dated March 24, 1978 (a copy of each has been tendered to the herein Grantee), and all requirements therein contained. 2. Land Use Permit Number 4C0310 dated September 6, 1978 of record in Volume 143, at Page 251 of the said Land Records. 3. Certification of compliance dated September 6, 1978 and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law dated September 6, 1978 (a copy of each has been tendered to the herein Grantee). It is a condition of this conveyance that the Grantee, his successors, heirs, and assigns, will install water conserving devices in any structure placed upon the premises herein conveyed. - a It is a condition of this conveyance that the Grantee, his successors, heirs, and assigns, will construct so much of the right of way within the 40 foot right of way shown on the aforesaid Plan as will lead northerly from Kimball Avenue to the service road or driveway constructed upon Lot 6 to serve the premises thereon constructed. It is a further condition of this conveyance that the Grantee, his successors, heirs, and assigns, construct a sidewalk as required by South Burlington in its Motion of Approval. Grantors reserve the right to approve the building to be built upon the premises herein conveyed by Grantee for his successors, heirs, and assigns. Reference is hereby made to the above instruments, to the records thereof, to the records and references therein mentioned, all in further aid of this description. This conveyance is subject to all easements and right of way of record. `Q1II hZt)Jr Unb tV said granted premises, with all the privileges and ap- purtenances thereof, to the said Grantee ALAN D. PALMER, his heirs and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; And We the said Grantors, DANIEL J. O'BRIEN and LEO O'BRIEN, executors and administrators, do ALAN D. PALMER, his for ourselves and our heirs, covenant with the said Grantee heirs and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents we are the sole owner of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are �rpQrIIttt ElIEr ErirLitY[1rilnrP; except as aforesaid. We hereby engage to Parrant anb PP En-b the same against all lawful claims whatever, , 1n ttnEsB 4rrevf, We hereunto set our hand and seal this //' day of May A. D. 19 81. 3n 11reernre of 2LL Mate of PPrmont, SS_ At CHITTENDEN 19IInntu Z—D nie . O'Brien Leo O'Brien t this /l day of May A. D. 19 81, DANIEL J. O'BRIEN and LEO O'BRIEN personally appeared, and they acknowledged this instrument, by them sealed and subscribed, to be their free act and deed. Before me Notary Public P.O. BOX 2346, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PALMER COMPANY, LTD. SURVEYORS & CONSTRUCTORS B02 - 662 - 5661 April 21, 1982 Mr. David Spitz South Burlington Planner City of South Burlington, Vt. Re: Office Building 20 Kinb,=11 Avenue Dear David: I am requesting a one year extension of Phase 3i permits. The experation date is sometime in August 1982. There is little chance of starting construction before this time, due to our economic uncertanties. ir!c�cr•c, , Alan D. Palmer, Pres. Palmer Company, Ltd. STATE OF VERMONT INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION RE: Alan Palmer ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION IV Construction of - ) 25,000.square ) APPLICATION NUMBER 4C0310-3 foot building ) So. Burlington, Vt. ) APRIL 13, 1981 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Environmental Conservation, State of Vermont in the above captioned matter. PRE -HEARING COMMENTS Public building approval is required from the Protection Division. A temporary.pollution permit for stormwater discharge has been issued - #04-14-034. The Vermont Energy Office has the following comments on the permit application: 1. The vestibules at the major entrances are unheated; 2. Florescent fixtures should be used when possible; 3. There should be a night setback for thermostats; 4. There is no indication of the heating system to be used, and the Energy Office requests the Commission consider the type of heating system used; 5. The building has most of its glass facing north which, if possible, should be reversed to maximize solar gain; 6. The foundation should be insulated with R10 insulation; and 7. The exterior doors should also be insulated. I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Agency ENTRY OF APPEARANCE and PRE -HEARING COMNLNTS was sent by U.S. Mail (Postage Prepaid) to all statutory parties. Done on this 13th day of April, 1981 at Montpelier, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, STATE OF VERMONT INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 1 C Dana J. Coj- Levesque, Administrator Land Us $ Development NOTE TO THE APPLICANT AND OTHER CONCERNED PARTIES: The preceding comments are the result of the estate's review of this case in its role as a party in the Act 250 permit process. These commentsare not binding upon the District Environmental Commis- sion. ACT 250 NOTICE AMENDMENT APPLICATION AND HEARING 10 VSA, §6083-6088 Amendment application #4CO310-3 was filed by Alan Palmer, 4050 Willis- ton Road, South Burlington, Vermont, on March 27, 1981, for the construction of a 25,000 square foot office building on Lot #6 of Business Park North off of Industrial Park Road in South Burlington, Vermont. This project will be evaluated in accordance with the 10 environmental criteria of 10 VSA, §6086(a). Statutory parties to this application are the municipality, the municipal planning commission, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, and affected State agencies. Adjoining pro- perty owners may participate to the extent the proposal will have a direct effect on their property under the 10 criteria. Other persons may partici- pate at the discretion of the District Commission. If you wish to partici- pate, please contact the Coordinator for further information before the first hearing or date as specified below. A public hearing is scheduled for Friday, April 17, 1981, at 1 PM at the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, 58 Pearl Street, Essex Junction, Vermont. Susan G. Haitsma, District Coordinator 111 West Street, Essex Junction 879-6563 March 27, 1981 4050 WILLISTON ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PALMER COMPANY, LTD. SURVEYORS Se CONSTRUCTORS 802 -862 -5661 August 10, 1983 Mr. David Spitz South Burlington Planner City of South Burlington, Dorset St,, South Burlington, Vt. Re: Office Building 20 Kimball Avenue Dear David: I am requesting a one year extension of Phase 11 Permits. The experation date is August 17, 1983. There is little chance of starting construction before this time, due to our economic uncertanties. Digital Equipment Corporation does want additional space by November 1984, therefor I will be starting Phase 11 in mid 1984 to accommodate them. ,Sincerely, Alan D. Palmer, Pres, Palmer Company, Ltd. Auqust 17, 1983 Alan PaLner Palmer Company, LTD 4050 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Alan, The South Burlington Plannicjq Commission has granted your request for an extension to the permit for phase II of your office building on Kimball Avenue. However, the extension is only until June 1, 1984 rather than the full year that you requesti..�— Also, because of the current excess demand for sewer capacity, the Commission made it clear that they might be less favorable towards any more extension requests for this property. Please call this office if you have any questions. Sincerely, David 1-31. Spitz, City Planner DHS/n-Cq, 0 Y April 28, 1982 Alan D. Palmer Palmer Company, Ltd. P.O. Box 2346 South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Alan, The South Burlington Planning Cormission has granted a one year extension of Phase II permits for your office building on Kimball Avenue. The new expiration date is August 17, 1983. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner 18.112 Height of Structures a. The maximum height for all structures shall be 35 feet or 22 stories except as may be modified below. b. The Planning Commission may approve an increase in height for a structure up to 45 feet or 3 stories in the Cl, C2, IC, Airl, and R7 Districts if it determines that a taller structure (i) will utilize topography and will relate to other existing and proposed structures so as to be aesthetically compatible with the neigh- borhood, (ii) will not detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public streets and walkways, and (iii) will allow retention of additional green space that will enhance the appearance of the de- veloped property. c. For each foot of additional height above the normal 35 foot maximum, all front and rear yard setbacks shall be increased by 1 foot and all side yard setbacks shall be increased by 2 foot. d. Rooftop apparatus, such as solar collectors and air- conditioning equipment, shall conform to all height limitations. e. Radio antennas, farm silos, and church steeples that are taller than normal height limitations may be approved by the Board of Adjustment as a conditional use subject to the provisions of Sections 19.05 and 19.45. f. All height provisions are subject to the limitations of Section 19.45. 18.113 Minimum Size of Dwelling Units Minimum floor area, excluding unfinished basements and attics, porches, garages, and other space not custom- arily used for living space, shall be 425 square feet for multi -family dwelling units and 850 square feet for single and two-family dwelling units. Usable floor area shall be computed by measuring the outside dimensions of the building. 18.114 Reduction of Lot Size No lot shall be so reduced in area that the lot size, frontage, coverage, setbacks, or other requirements of these regulations shall be smaller than herein prescribed for each district. an ?,.a,\toer, L& -*-6 '$ ""*440 PLX�L Nad06,% STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # 4 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vt. 879-6563 MEMORANDUM TO: All Parties FROM: Anna Lucia, Secretary for District #4 Commission DATE: March 26, 1987 RE: Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0310-3A Alan Palmer South Burlington A copy of the above referenced permit was sent to you on March 20, 1987. The permit construction completion date was October 15, 2018. This date is wrong and has been corrected on the attached permit. Since the original permit amendment #4C0310-3A had not been recorded in the land records, we will not issue a "Corrected" permit amendment to be recorded. The attached permit amendment replaces the permit you received on March 20, 1987. If you have any questions, please call me at the above number. State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT AMENDMENT CASE No. #4C0310-3A LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT Alan D. Palmer ADDRESS Palmer Company, Ltd. 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 4050 Williston Road (Act 250) and Vermont South Burlington, VT 05403 State Environmental Protection Rules; Chapter 4, Public Buildings, Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal Chapter 8, Water Supply Chapter 9, Plumbing District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit #4C0310-3A pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 48, Page 45 of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Alan D. Palmer, the "permittee" as "grantee." This permit specifically authorizes the permittee to construct a 9,600 square foot office addition to an existing office building located on Lot No. 6 of Business Park North off Industrial Park Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The permittee, and his assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Approved" and on file with the District Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 2. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the permittee confirms and agrees for himself and all assigns and successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. 3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed in accordance with the terms of the permit. #4C0310-3A Land Use Permit Page 2 4. By acceptance of this permit the Permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. 5. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Public Buildings Permit #PB-4-1253 issued on February 13, 1987 by the Regional Engineer, Division of Protection, Agency of Environmental Conservation in compliance with the Vermont State Environmental Protection Rules. Conditions #6, 7 and 8 of said permit are as follows: (6) It is assumed that the interior sewer and water piping will connect to the interior plumbing within the existing building. If new exterior sewer and water services are to be extended to the 2 floor addition, additional information will be required to determine compliance of the services with the Environmental Protection Rules. (7) No alterations to the existing building which would change or affect the interior waste plumbing, water supply, or wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Environmental Conservation. (8) No construction is permitted until such time as complete and satisfactory plans for the interior plumbing and vent- ilation have been submitted to and approved by the Protec- tion Division. 6. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall install and maintain water -conserving plumbing fixtures, including but not limited to low -flush toilets, low -flow shower - heads, and aerator -type or flow -restricted faucets. 7. The heated structures approved herein shall be constructed with insulation with an R-Value of at least R-20 in the exterior walls, at least R-40 in the roof or cap and at least R-40 in the exposed floor. 8. From October 1 to April 15 of any calendar year, all non - vegetated disturbed areas of the construction site shall be mulched until final vegetative cover is established. A11 erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced, and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review ero- sion control, and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control, as they deem necessary. #4C0310-3A Land Use Permit Page 3 9. All outdoor lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view substantially beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 10. All construction on this project must be completed by March 30, 1988. 11. This permit shall expire on October 15, 2008, unless extended by the District Commission. Notwithstanding the latter date, this permit shall expire one year from date of issuance if the Permittee has not demonstrated an intention to proceed with the project. In any event, substantial construction must occur within two years of the issuance date. 12. Failure to comply with any of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Section 6090 (b) . Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this * day of March, 1987. ,W64v� Katherine M. Vose District #4 Coordinator KMV/JTE/aml By r T. Ewing, Ch rm n istrict #4 Commi s' n Commissioners participating in this decision: John T. Ewing Richard H. Wadhams Helen B. Lawrence ko yo, City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 Alan Palmer Palmer Company 4050 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT. 05403 Dear Mr. Palmer: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 December 17, 1986 This letter serves to confirm that the City of South Burlington has granted site plan approval for a 9,600 square foot addition to the office building at 20 Kimball Avenue. This is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. There is adequate water to serve this project. A 300 gallon per day sewer allocation was granted for this addition. This allocation is part of the original O'Brien Business Park North subdivision. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur City Planner 2. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 17, 1981 They could then be paved if needed. Mr. Spitz felt that the parking situation would have to be looked at more carefully. Mr. Schner said the company would not own its own boxes, but would use a common carrier. There is enough room for a 40' trailer and cab to get to the loading docks without going onto the land next door. He said the road would be upgraded back as far as they needed to do it. He was not sure whether it would be paved or not. The building is 16' froa the west property line and coverage is N6. Messrs. Woolery, Mona and Walsh agreed they would rather see the building sited where it is than closer to the road. Drainage will be to the rear. Mr. Jacob felt that about 40 or more parking spaces would be plenty. Mr. Spitz said the land contours might affect parking and he wanted to look into that, noting that the building might also have to be shifted. Mr. Ewing moved to continue the public hearing on the proposal for a warehouse and distribution center at 2069 Williston Road until February 24 at City Hall at 7:30 pm. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and all favored it. Application by Alan Palmer for site plan approval of a 25,700 sy ft office building on lot 6, Kimball Avenue Mr. Mark Ward represented Mr. Palmer. Mr. Spitz said there was a 40' right of way for shared access to 3 lots. An office building is proposed. The ordinance requires 128 parking spaces and 108 are shown. Mr. Spitz said the ordinance required 1 space per 200 sq. ft. and he felt 1 per 250 sq. ft. would be plenty. The lot is almost 2 acres in size, Mr. Ward said. Mr. Mona warned thattisidewalk would be required. It will probably be uuilt within the Kimball Avenue right of way, far enough from the paving so there will be room for snow storage. The building will have 2 stories in the front and 3 in the rear. The slope of the land was discussed and landscaping was looked at. Mr. Ewing suggested taking two -parking spaces out of the center of the row of parking and putting some plantings in to break that up in the center of the lot. The building will be constructed in phases. There will be a 30' x 200' pond 2' deep on the lot. Mr. Woolery did not want tall lights. Mr. Schner, as an adjoining neighbor, said he was concerned about drainage to the rear. He noted that the Swale here was for overflow from Potash Brook where it goes under a building in the area. He felt that if' more water went into that swale, as proposed, it would cause more problems for land of his which is affected by that water and he asked that the Swale be enlarged to accomodate the flow and that it be done by this applicant. Mr. Ewing felt Mr. Ward could offer to do that but that it could not be a stipulation and he pointed out the Swale was on Munson property. Mr. Mona felt the two property owners should make an agreement between them and Mr. Spitz said the Commission could not review drainage under site -plan. Looking back in the minutes, however, it was found that the subdivision approval contained a stipulation to review drainage at site -plan. Mr. Ward said he and Mr. Schner would discuss the situation and come to an agreement before a building permit is issued. P"s. Woolery moved .that the South Burliton Panning commission approve the_site application .�Qf_Alan Palmer_ fora, 2.5t204 _sq. -ft`office. building _in the Business ?ark North subdivision as depicted on a plan entitled "Lot 6 L Professional Offices, Kimball Avenue," dated 2 4 81, pre_ red by_Palmer 3. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 17, 198,E Company Ltd, subject to the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall provide an offer of dedication for the 15 foot wide pedestrian easement prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A landscaping, bond of at least $14,500 shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. Landscaping information 1-1 acceptable to th'e Cit_y Planner shall appear on the revised_: to plan. 3. Parking spaces shall -be...a. minimum of 180 sq. ft. 4. Approval for phase I expires in 6 months. Approval for phase II expires in 18 months. Phases shall be as shown on the site -plan.. 5. A sidewalk shall be constructed along tho �sayire frontage and noted on the plan of record. All curb cuts on the lot other than the one shown as access shall be closed and the appropriate bonding posted. 6. The pla.r s�,ia tl be approved by the City Engineer and noted__ on the plan of record. This applicant and the neighbors have to come to a reasonably agreeable solution for drainage into the swale on the Munson property and Potash Brook, which must be approved by the City -Engineer. The authority for this stipulation comes from the provisions of the original' subdivision approval. 7. Lighting shall be approved by the City Planner. 8. Applicable stipulations of the subdivision of May 23, 1978 shall apply.------__----- _--------_ 9. All necessary legal documentation for the shared right of way shall be provided before issuance of a building permit. lU. The revised site plan shall be submitted prior issuance of a - -- - building permit and shall include all the above stipulations. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion. Mr. Woolery liked the idea of breaking up the front row of parking spaces with some landscaping and Mr. Spitz saw no problem with that. Mr. Ewing wanted to no :pure it was understood that the dr.ainge discussed was not just from the p:=rkinv lot, but was along the Munson Swale. It was noted that "neighbors" in stipulation #6 meant abutters and others. The sidewalk will extend from pool.-,erty line to property line and exactly where it will be placed will be bvtw�-t,n ths !pity any developer. Mr. Woolery said the curb cut into the lot should oe the only one on the entire property. Utilities will be underground. The motion carried unanimously. Other business Mr. Jacob mentioned the proposed zone change to industrial in the Southeast Quadrant on Hinesburg Road and said he hoped the Commission could find a solution which would not hurt the homeowners who will be affected. He also noted that some members of the Commission felt that meetings were too long and should be ended sooner. The Commission might be more efficient if it had a time restriction. After some discussion, he moved that it i_ s the policy of the Commission to end the meetings at 10.30 pm. At 10:00 pm the 3. PLANNING COMM- ISSION JANUARY 24, 1984 Mrs. Maher said she could not vote for this plan. She thought it was regrettable that only 4 members were present to hear the application, because she felt it was unfair to the applicants not to have a full commission. She said the park would be used during the summer and would attract children on bikes on a road that is terrible. She felt the Zoning Board had made a mistake in approving this. She felt it would have more traffic than the original industrial use and would produce bike and pedestrian traffic, which will be very dangerous. She did not feel the deceleration lane would mitigate the danger. She liked the use and would like to have it in South Burlington, but not in this location. Mrs. Hurd added that eventually the other 4 'lots would have industrial uses and she was not sure it would be good to have a recreation area in the middle of an industrial area. Mr. Poger noted that approval of this use might affect what was allowed on the other lots . Mr. Poger said he wanted to see a sidewalk, a change in the geometry of the access drive so busses could use it if necessary, and a 320' deceleration lane. Mrs. Maher felt a sidewalk would only be helpful if it extended over the hill to the next intersection. Mr. Poger said the Commission could not require that, but it might ask that the city put such a walk on its highest priority list. Mr. Ward suggested that the traffic report be reviewed. Mr. Belter moved to continue the public hearing on the seasonal aqua park until February 14, 1984 at 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mrs. Hurd seconded the motion and it carried with Mrs. Maher abstaining. Consider request ase II at a height of forty-four 44 ee in accordance with Section 18.112 of the Zoning Regulations ,!r. Mona came in at this point. Mr. Ward said the front of the building now was 33' overall and th aback is 44' overall. The proposed new addition to the west of the building would be one story higher than the existing building. Mr. Poger said the section of the regulations in question had been intended to allow another story to be built into a sloping ground, for example, so the roof line would remain the same, but more space could be added. He did not feel this fit the criteria. Mr. Mona added that the existing building already looked high and he did not want to add another story. No one spoke in favor of granting the request. Palmer,)20 Kimball Abenue to construct etch plan review, Green Mountain Power (Real Estate Division) for two lot bdivision of lot #17 of the National Life subdivision Mr. Perry represented Green Mountain Real Estate. He said that the new headquarters building was now complete and that for tax reasons the construction financing was being rolled -over through a limited partnership leasing arrangement. That involves a purchase option. The investor does not care about the entire parcel of land, and it is Green Mountain's opinion that in that case, why should they have an option to purchase it? They would therefore like to separate a 4.5 acre piece of land on the east and a 3/4 acre piece over the bank. Access to the 4.5 acre piece would be over the existing drive serving the GMP building, cutting through the north end of the parking lot. This would involve a minor landscaping change. There is no plan to develop or sell this piece at this time, although there eight be a request in the future to develop an office building on the site. The land might be donated to the city. He said the large piece was flat, but the small one was totally unbuildable. Y/ MEMO-JBL 10/10/86 prior to permit. The amount will be available at the meeting. Other: A complete erosion control study should be available at the October 28 meeting. The Commission can postpone decision on this application until then unless it is satisfactory to make the study a condition of approval. Height: This building is three stories high as allowed under the ordinance with special Planning Commission approval. The height of the finished floor area is 36 feet. However, a peak with a glassed atrium measures 52 feet. A Zoning Board of Adjustment variance will be request for this. The setbacks have been increased according to the ordinance to meet the 52 feet if granted. The Planning Commission may approve the height of 36 feet if it determines that a taller structure: 1) Will utilize topography and will relate to other existing and proposed structures so as to be aesthetically compatible with the neighborhood; 2) Will not detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public streets and walkways; and 3) Will allow retention of additional green space that will enhance the appearance of the developed property. These items will be addressed by the applicant. I recommend that any approval be conditional upon ZBA approval of the height. If denied by the ZBA, a modification to the footprint would require a new Planning Commission approval. Sewer allocation: Phase one will have 255 employees and requires a sewer allocation of3825 gallons per day. Phase two also has 255 employees and requires this amount. The $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. PALMER 0 KIMBALL AVENUE Alan Palmer proposes to construct a 9,600 square foot addition (4,800 square feet on two floors) to the existing building. The existing building is 26,100 square feet. The addition will be on the eastern side of the building. It will'be the same height as the existing building and parking will be allowed below the raised structure. Access: Access will remain from the existing curb cut and frontage road/driveway on Kimball Avenue. Circulation: Circulation does not change because the building will be raised for parking below it. 5 P7 MEMO-JBL 10/10/86 Parking: The entire building requires 143 spaces. The plans show this amount. Landscaping: The addition requires $8,200 in new landscaping. The plans show $4500 in new landscaping. I recommend that larger trees be substituted for the proposed trees. Lot Coverage: Coverage does not change because the area is already paved where the raised addition will be. Height: The height at the highest point from the grade level will be 35 feet. Other: A sewer allocation of 300 gpd is required for 20 additional employees. This project is part of the original subdivision and 3020 gpd, remains prior to this allocation. See Goddette's and Szymanski's comments. 10) PALMER OT #1, RDR ENTERPRISES, KIMBALL AVENUE Mr. Palmer was unable to work out an agreement with the O'Briens for access across their property; he requests approval to construct the entrance drive across the CO District as shown on the original plan. 11) MILOT, 900 DORSET STREET Mr. Milot requests an indefinite postponement of his sketch plan application until progress is made with negotiations with the city for the park land. He wants to keep a plan on file with the City in case we attempt to change the zoning since he believes he is entitled to the zoning under which the plan was originally filed. C• PLANNING COMMISSION 14 OCTOBER 1986 PAGE $ anticipate using it less. Mrs. Lafleur said the plan will have to be redesigned to show required setbacks from Holmes Rd. extension and parking removed from the right-of-way. The Commission may want to designate an entrance only on Shelburne Rd. - Regarding drainage, they are required to have a filtration pone for the site. Water will be filtered and released to a culvert under Shelburne Rd. They are using only 75% of their present parking and will ask for a reduction in the parking requirement. There will be a tenant on one floor to start with. They will leave room to expand parking if necessary. The traffic standard is met as they suggest only 272 trips will be produced and 538 are allowed. Erosion control will be dealt with at the 10/28 meeting. The building is 3 floors, 36 ft. high. They want to break the top line of the building with an atrium greenhouse which would be 45 ft. high. Members agreed this would be OK. Mrs. Maher asked about the sidewalk. Mrs. Lafleur said they are trying to get the state to put in the sidewalk; if this cannot be achieved, the applicant will bond for the sidewalk Mrs. Maher said she would hope for some evergreen trees to be included. Mr. Ptaszinsky said they are thinking about screening between their lot and Nordic Ford and may use evergreens. Mrs. Hurd moved that the item be continued until October 28. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Site plan application of Alan Palmer for construction of a 9600 sq. ft. addition to the existing building, 20 Kimball Avenue. Mr. Palmer said Phase I and II are now built. They propose a buiding northeast of the existing building, 2 stories high, raised above the parking lot to the same height as the present building. They will donate what can't be used for landscaping to the city for recreation or park acquisition use. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Palmer Company for a 9600 sq. ft. addi- tion to the existing building at 30 Kimball Ave. as depicted PLANNING COMMISSION 14 OCTOBER 1986 PAGE C' on a plan entitled "Lot #6, Professional Offices, Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared 12y Palmer Company, LTD, dated 9/29/86 with the following stipulations 1. An $8,20Vlandscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. The plans shall be revised to show landscaping valued at this amount. It shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to permit. Any amount not allocated for landscaping shall be donated to the City for park use. 2. A sewer allocation of 300 gpd is granted from the original subdivision approval. 3. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mrs. Maher seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 10. Consider request from Alan Palmer to construct an access drive for lot #1, RDR Enterprises, Kimball Avenue Mr. Palmer reported he couldn't get anywhere with the O'Briens. Mr. Jacob said he felt the best effort had been made and has cost Mr. Palmer significant money. Mrs. Maher said she felt the access should be bridged. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Alan D. Palmer for construction of two industrial buildings of 89,800 sq. ft. total on lot #1 of RDR Enterprises three lot subdivision on Kimball Avenue as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan for Lot #1, RDR Enterprises, Inc., prepared �?y Palmer Company, LTD, dated May 1986 with the following stipulations: 1. The stipulations #1 through 5 of the August 12, 1986 approval shall remain in effect. 2. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Burgess seconded, and the motion passed 5-1 with Mrs. Maher voting against. Other Business Mrs. Lafleur said that Mr.Milot had requested tabling of his sketch plan and feels that because of what happened to a friend in Burlington, he wants to keep his plan in front of the Commission. Members agreed there was no plan presently