HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0175 Kennedy DriveWINDRIDGE HOMMWNERS ASSUCIRiluiv
Gerald Johnson
175 Kennedy Drive
Area zoned R-7 District
Section 11.00 Dimensional requirements
Minimum rear yard- 30 feet
Proposed rear yard - 20 feet
Proposed is three 10'xl5' patio decks at units 1, 2 and 3 to within 20 feet of
the rear property line.
May 11, 1983
Mr. William Perrault
unit #17, 175 Kennedy Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Perrault:
Be advised that the Zoning Board of -Nijust-nent has granted your request for a
zoning variance. Me Board will issue formal findings at a later date. 'Phis
office will issue a permit upon your request.
If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call mt.
Very truly,
Richard Ward,
Zoning Administrative Officer
9V/nicq
May 25, 1982
Mr. Gerald Johnson
175 Kennedy Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Nor. Johnson:
Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment has granted your
request for a zoning variance.
The Board will issue formal findings at a later date. This office will issue a
permit upon request.
3 If_ you have any questions feel free to call rne.
Very truly,
Richard Ward,
Zoning Administrative Officer
Ll Rw/mcg
August 24, 1982
Mr. David Lamonda
Box 149A
Shelburne, Vermont 05482
Dear Mr. Lamonda:
Be advised that. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment
has granted your request for a zoning variance.
The Board will issue formal findings at a later date.
This office will issue your permit upon request.
If you have any questions feel free to contact me.
Very truly,
Richard Ward,
Zoning Administrative Officer
RW/mcg
April 4, 1979
Mr. John Larkin
1185 Shelburne Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Larkin:
Be advised that the South Burlington City Council has ap.j:,roved
your request for a conditional use (seventeen (17) residential units)
according to the proposal of record, based on the following stip-
ulationss
1 - that this residential complex conform to the City sub-
division regulations.
2 - that this complex be serves: by municipal sewer and water
facilities.
3 - that this epnroval is limited to the use proposed and shall
expire six months From this date (for commencement of this use).
This proposal should be scheduled for subdivision review as
soon as possible, please contact hir. Steve Page at this office.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Very truly,
Richard ward,
Zoning Administrative Officer
Rtv/mcg
r
/1� X" o L
-f' CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT
I Name of Applicant '�SQRW �V-4H
II
Name of
Subdivision .i
W 1640FADkie ,L ��✓" -
III
Indicate
any changeslto
name, address, or phone number of
owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, sur-
veyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat
application: �A -
p��ots�,�t�
IV Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots
or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the
property, developmental timetable, since preliminary plat
application s �Mpk OF ?. ftiAllt Off
ADDLD
V Attach a final plat drawing (originals not needed) showing the
following information:
(1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title, the name
and address of the record owner and subdivider, the name,
license number and seal of the licensed land surveyor, the
boundaries of the subdivision and its general location in
relation to existing streets or other land marks, scale
(numerical and graphic), date and true north arrow.
(2) Street names and lines, pedestrial ways, lots, reservations,
easements, and areas to be dedicated to public use.
(3) Sufficient data acceptable to the City Engineer to determine
readily the location, bearing and length of every street line,
lot line, boudary line and to reproduce such lines upon the
around. Where applicable these should be tied to reference
points previously established by the city.
-2-
(4) The length of all straight lines, the deflection angles,
radii, length of curves and central angles of all curves,
tangent distances and tangent bearings for each street.
(5) By property designation on such Plat, all public space
for which offers of cession are made by the subdivider
and those spaces title to which is reserved by him.
(6) Lots within the subdivision numbered in numerical order
within blocks, and bloc's lettered in alphabetical order.
(7) The location of all of the i_:ip-ovements referred to in
Section 301.1tan_d in addition thereto the location of
all utility poles, se -...,age disposal systems, rater supply
systems and rough grading and other devices and �..iet'nods
of draining the area affecting the sul>c"ivision.�{
S3Je.�� SV�n�v�1O1-� ✓-��.
n-,.n
(8) Permanent reference �ontrie Its sho-.,.-n thus: and lot
corner 7marhers shoran thus: "0".
(9) Construction drawings of all :.-equired iimrovements.
VI Znclose supj-lorting documents listed beloa or request that they
be required as a condition of final plat approval:
(1) Copies of proposed deeds, agreements or other 6ocu-iants
showing the :canner in which open space, including park
and recreational areas and school site areas, are to be
dedicated, reserved and maintained and a certificate of
the City Attorney that these documents are satisfactory.
(2) A certificate of the City �Zgineer as to the satisfactory
completion o= all improvements required by- the Con-nission,
or, in lieu of any required L-aprove„►ents not so completed,
a performance bond to secure completion of such improvements
and their l:iaintenance for a period of two years, and
written evidence that the Citv Council is satisfied
either with the bonding or surety company or with security
furnished by the subdivider.
(3) A copy of such covenants or dead restrictions as are in-
tended to cover all or part of the tract.
(4) A prospectus describing the management organization if one
is required.
(5) In the case of a subdivision or development served by a
privately owned and/or maintained street:.
(a) a copy of all proposed deeds, agreements, or other
documents which convey or relate to the use of a
privately owned street or right-of-way, and a certi-
fic-te of the City Attorney that these documents are
satisfactory.
-3-
(b) a completed contract between the landovmer and the
city regarding the number of lots or dwelling units
to be served by the proposed right-of-way or private
.street and the responsibility for the roadway maint-
enance, along with a certificate of the Ci--v attorney
that the contract is satisfactory.
ZL I
(sicratur ) appli_`nt ir co tact person 'A e
si 1
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN
1) Name, address, and phone number of;
a. Owner of record Jcp"'l LAB K i,,�J 7l4z4q
L. vo -, Li )C- ( _
b. Applicant To.-�,,A LAE-KitJ L.Z.
c. Contact personsAtir��
11;9 P F-Age-1(— S7
Lf _`
2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development,
including number of lots, units, or parcels involved as well
as proposed use(s). i-7 6x\1' 't Vl�t_�c!is r(-<(/ jr `
'P e k\! F-A c-) A3 F C-Ae-c..E. L -2 . ; ..,�
3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple,
option, etc) _ r t, i- 5 i w pl- E
4) Namesof owners of record of all contiguous properties
5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as
easements, covenants, teases, rights of way, etc.
�z
-2-
6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of
municipal facilities such as sewerage, water supply,
streets, storm drainage, etc.
177 otyA
7) Describe any actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment,
or previous actions by the South Burlington Planning Commission,
which affect the proposed subdivision anpinclude dates:
C0UK1C( L"�_bVrikt,. C7�LY
8) Attcch a sketch plan showing all information required under
items 2 through 7 on p. 5 of the Subdivision Regulations.
S - / �1 047 -4t
(signature) applicant or contact person ate
FOR OFFICE USE
submission of application and sketch plan to administrativeate
officer
this proposal is classified as a major or minor subdivision
- application deemed complete
- proposal tentatively scheduled for first Planning
Commission meeting on
Confirmed For if
,;0000--C_,
� t
F
q
LE : %4Vkge0V1 LAw-
aP4er -e_-. ---
µ /Vt
CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS
P. O. BOX 82 WARREN, VT. 05674 TEL. (802) 496-3758
March 5, 1979
Mr. Jerry Milot Mr. Stephen Page
Milot Real Estate South Burlington Planning Commission
Essex Junction, Vt. South Burlington, Vt.
Gentlemen:
We are pleased to submit the traffic impact study for the Larkin -
Tarrant Develorm-ent and the Colony Park office Center.
The conclusions enclosed are self explantory. Briefly, they
are that:
a. The Larkin Tarrant development will have a
minor impact on local streets. The approach to
Kennedy Drive from Rte. 116 (north) at peak
hour is already over saturated, and will even-
tually need upgrading.
b. The Colony Park Office Center will create a
significant amount of traffic, but this traf-
fic will not create unstable conditions at
the intersection ay)oroaches affected.
L P L A_�� m7i
xh � -�,- A-e � 1i - ' DT'
CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS
P. O. BOX 82 WARREN, VT. 05674 TEL. (802) 496-3758
Page 1
ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE COLONY PARK OFFICE
CENTER AND LARKIN-TARRANT. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERSECTION TRAFFIC
CAPACITY
A. SCOPE OF THE STUDY
This study has been prepared for Milot Real Estate and the City
of South Burlington in order to determine the effect of the Colony
Park office upon traffic movement along Kennedy Drive, specifically
at the Kennedy Drive - Rte. 2 and Kennedy Drive - Rte. 116 inter-
sections. Eventual recommendations for changes in intersection
control will be relative to the specific intersection only, and will
not consider the effect of those changes in the general traffic pat-
tern of the area. The study relies on data supplied by the Vermont
Department of Highways, Traffic Research Division, the Chittenden
County Regional Planning Comuni.ssion, as well as information supplied
by your office. The conclusions are in regard to the effect of these
projects only.
B. ANALYSIS OF PRESENT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
1. Description of Intersections.
The various physical factors influencing the flow of traffic
through the intersections are presented in Table I below. Both
the Kennedy Drive - Rte. 2 and Kennedy Drive - Rte. 116 intersections
are controlled by fixed cycle three phase traffic signals. All four
approaches to the Kennedy Drive - Rte. 2 intersection have right
turn lanes. The capacities for both intersections were obtained
from the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Urban
Transportation Study 1976. The right turn on red law became effec-
tive in South Burlington on July 1, 1977, and would increase the
previously used capacity standards for these intersections. How-
ever, these increases are not clearly quantifiable and are not
considered in this study.
2. 1979 Traffic Volumes
Traffic counts for both intersections were obtained from the.
Vermont Department of Highways. (See Appendix A) These were one
day, six hour turning movements surveys conducted on August 23, 1977.
For Rte. 116 and Kennedy drive, these are recanputed to 1979 Average
Daily Traffic (ADT) and Peak Hour (PHV) volumes according to Depart-
ment of Highway formulas and are presented in Table III.
TABLE I
INTERSECTION DESIGN CiARACTERISTICS
INTERSECTION
STREET
TRAVEL
LANE
WIDTH
R.T.
LANE
L.T.
LANE
SIGNAL
CONTROL
GREEN
TIME
M
LEFT
TURN
SIGNAL
RIGHT
TURN
ON
RED
ON
STREET
PARKING
PEDESTRIAN
CROSSINGS
DESIGN*
ADEQUACY
REMARKS
KENNEDY DRIVE
Two
No
Yes
F.C.331
33%
No
Yes:
No
Insignif.
Good
Lane
AIRPORT DRIVE
33%
"
"
"
"
(`,ppd
RTE. 2
"
"
"
►'
54%
Good
East appro
E. & W.
grade in e:
KENNEDY DRIVE
"
"
Yes
"
470
Good
E. & W.
I
RTE. 116
No
31%
Fair
N. & S.
to good
* CONSIDERS: ALIGNMENT; GRADIENT; VISIBILITY; NO. OF CURB CUTS NEAR INTERSECTION
3� FIXED CYCLE, THREE PHASE, NO SIGNAL DELAY
Page 2
For Rte. 2 and Kennedy Drive, we have followed the Vermont
Department of Highways assumption that the peak hour volumes
(4-5P.M.) shown in the Turning Movement Data sheet reflect the
30th or "design hour" vloumes, and in fact may actually reflect
the actual annual peak hour. The have been updated to 1979
according to the Department of Highways 20 per annum growth
rate.
C. PRWEC ED TRAFFIC INCREASES FROM THE LARKI _TARRAN DEVEWPMENT
The Larkin -Tarrant Development is a 17 unit apartment complex
located on Kennedy Drive east of Rte. 116. Traffic generated by this
project has been forecast according to the standard of one (1) vehicle
trip per dwelling unit at peak hour. Of these, 0.75 were vechiles
returning to the development, and 0.25 were exiting. Only the former
were considered in this study.
Assumptions as to the origin of these return trips were based on
the location of existing major employment centers and cca-ranercial deve-
lopment in the Greater Burlington area.
Briefly, distribution between the intersections has been based on
the following assumptions:
Kennedy Drive [Jest approach to Rte. 116 350
Rte. 116 North approach to Kennedy Drive 250
Rte. 2 west approach to Kennedy Drive 100
Rte. 2 east approach to Kennedy Drive 200
Digital Complex 100
D. PraJECTED TRAFFIC INCREASES FRAM THE COLOJY PARK OFFICE CENTER
Colony Park is a 40,000 sq. ft. general office complex. Using
standards derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers
research, the number of cars leaving the complex between 4 and 5 P.M.
is estimated at 48 cars (standard = 2.4 cars per 1,000 sq. ft. office
space during the 4 - 6 P.M. peak period).
Assumptions as to the destination of these vehicles is based on the
general intensity and pattern of development in the greater Burlington
area. This pattern suggests that 600 of the vehicles leaving the complex
will turn towards Rte. 2, and the balance will head towards the inter-
section of Kennedy Drive and Rte. 116. These assumptions were corroborated
by a recent survey of the destination of cars leaving the Digital Cc mle_x*.
The distribution of the additional vehicle trips generated by both
projects is shown in Tables II and III.
* Conducted by Bruce Houghton for the South Burlington Planning Commission.
TABLE III
VEHICLE
1979
APPROACH
MOVEMENT
PHV
AIRPORT DRIVE
St.
67
(NORTH)
Lt.
25
Rt,
14
WILLTSTON RD.
St.
519
(Southeast)
Lt.
112
Rt.
209
i<ENNEDY DR.
St.
96
(South)
Lt.
198
Rt.
35
uTILLISTON M.
St.
54
(west)
Lt.
35
Rt.
21
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
PZENNEDY DRIVE AND RTE. 2
ADDITIONAL VOLUME (PH)
OFFICE RES.
USE USE
- 1
28 -
TOTAL
PEAK
HOUR
106
AM
357
111
CAPACITY
G/C VPH V/C
33% 715 0.15
54% 897 0.94
33% 562 0.64
54% 1134 0.10
DISTRIBUTION OF ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC
AMONG INTERSECTION APPROACHES
TABLE II
NO. OF
NO. OF
DSVELm=
17,-7I?LLING
R1!"PURNING
2 WILLISTON ROAD
KENNEDY DRIVE - RTE. 116
UN111 , OR
OR LEAVING
_ _.
,
—
OTIPIC�
CARS,
RT1;.2
WE- , 2
KMZM,DY
AIRPORT DR.
I E-WEDY DR. KDO EDY DR. R'I'L;. 116
RTE. 116
SPAC-C,
(P.H.)
ENST
WEST
DRIVE
NORn-I
WEST EAST SOUTHEAST
North
LARKIN -
TARRANCE
17 d.u.
13*
1
1
-
--
6
-
-
3
DEVELOPMENT
k
:OLONY PARK
40,000
48
-
-
19
-
-
29
-
OFFICE CENTER
sq. ft.
* The vehicles returning frcen the Digital Complex do not appear in the intersection analysis.
TABLE III (continued)
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
KENNEDY DRIVE AND M'E. 116
TOTAL
APPR:)Aai
VECIiICLE
1977
ADDITIONAL VOLUME (PH)
PEAK
CAPACITY
1'
MOVEMENT
HnUR
G/C VPH VPC
VOLUME
OIfiICE RES
USE USE
TABLE
IMZMDY
DRIVE AND RI'. 116
RT. 116
St.
207
3
516
31% 348 1.48
(Northwest
Lt.
40
Rt.
266
l
tJi✓
K=,DY DR.
St.
453
29 -
567
47% 958 0.61
(Northeast)
Lt.
45
Rt.
40
Rt. 116
St.
60 - - 166 31% 413 0.39
(Southeast)
Lt.
33
Rt.
73
GWNEDY DR.
St.
432 - 6 768 47% 1215 0.63
(West)
Lt.
153
Rt.
147
V/C = Volive/Capacity; G/C = Percentage Green Seconds per signal cycle; VPC = Vehicle per hour
PHV = Peak Hour Volume
1. Source: Chittenden County Regional Planning Con nission, Urban Transportation Study, 1976.
Page 3
E. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOmENDATIONS
The volume per capacity ratios (Table III) indicate that neither
of the projects will create an unstable level of flow (V/C = 1.0) at
any of the intersection approaches analyzed. Havever, an unstable
level of peak hour service already exists along Rte. 116 Northwest
approach to Kennedy Drive. However, traffic generated by the Larkin -
Tarrant Development will not significantly contribute to this problem.
At the Rte. 2 and Kennedy Drive intersection, an unstable level
of flaw is imTLinent on the Williston Road (Southeast) approach (V/C
= 0.94). Hawever, the projects do not contribute to this problem
either. The low V/C ratios for the other approaches suggest that
this problem could be forestalled by changing the green cycles.
APPENDIX A
REFERENCES TO TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA
CHITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
URBAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-OWN: SOUTH BURLINGTON
NTERSECTION: WILLISTON ROAD (U.S. ROUTE 2), AIRPORT DRIVE & KENNEDY DRIVE
)ATE: JULY 1976
APPROACH VEHICLE
MOVEMENT
EXISTING CONDITION
BALANCED MNDITK)N
G/C WC Copocity (VPH)
G/C V/C Ca"city (VPH)'
orthwe st)
rport Drive St = Rt - Lt
33022%
715
30%
245
648
'outheast
'illiston Road St - Rt - Lt
54°/ 70%
897
57%
665
949 -
you— t�
2nnedy Drive St - Rt - Lt
Vest
Filliston Road St - Rt - Lt
33°/ 60%
562
-
30%
66°
508
�1201
54% 45%
1134
57%°
42°
Tune 24, 1975; Tuesday; P.M. Peak Hour
PREVAILING CONDITIONS:
preen (G)/ seconds in cycle (C)
V/Cx volum- (V)/capacity (C)
VPH 4 y-oh►-Cf-ts per hour . -49-
- �-••■ ■+,�nvrsai PLANNING DIVISION
PLACE:,
TRAFFIC RESEARCH
SECT,
DIR
PC
T TOT
D!R
PC
T
TOT DIR
PC T
TOT
HR
_
7•
- 7
zz
/
23
33
_
3 3
S .
/
/2
Z
2/
z
z3
43
Z,3
/
24
/•¢
_113
20
/6
/
/7
i7
w
o
a
O w
TOT
sa
z sZ
TOT
1sG ' {
a Q
Q
PC
T TOT
DIR
'
.TOT
/33-
o
DIR
PC
T TOT
HR
A3
7
NORTH
/G
/ . /7
A/
-- 7
/9 •
/ • Za -
Q
sue'
4 • Go
/s
_ 9
z /08
io
77
S8
I / ,
S9 I TOT
Pt I
T
TOT DIR
/tea•
7
/�
/7.
171
r iG3
7'
/70
/83
8
/9/
ZQ 7
8
}
z /s-
zGS
g •
7i9
S!
/zo3
TOT
PC
T
TOT
DIR 1
ti3 Z • .
/ •
33
z4-
z7 (
-
z7
�4-
-z4
ocs z
z4ot
TOT 33Z
/6
DIR PC
T
TOTHR
Z24
/3
237
/z
240 _
zc,•
Z�(o
,(3
�zG
2-4
ZSo
/-;e
3�8 •
24 '
37Z
is-
483
I �'
4117
iG
4o9
4LS
/7
Sz9a
TOT
DIR
1430
PC
I
1 i 9
T ,
Z049 f
TOT
HR
/OJ•
2
/31
A
�
Ice
z 9 •
/3
/S
•
/�?
�9•
zo/
/G
/a
/:C'/
/7
` IIf
PC: All passenger cars and 2-axle
4-tire trucks
/ 7G' /coo TOT
T : Medium and heavy trucks
and busses.
DIR PC r
TOT DIR PC o. T TOT DIR
__ TOT i G 8/
PC-1 T TOT
/z3
jHR
C'c y
•'.
z�
1
Z7 qs •;
4 5-
78
I p • I
�. a
iz
-4
67•
99
�:�
\3q
1
40
—
Yo
-74•
�34
I7
►st
/S
190
I
I
z9 72�?
7S
i l z
t 4'
I ZC,
{ 17
0
n
n
d
o
f
TOT 330
33 tOT
(G59
�
x
z
67
►-
u
CHI T TEi IDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING CO r►MISSiON
URBAN TRANSPORTATION SI UDY
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
TOWN: SOUTH BURLINGTON
jlpqTEbSECTION: KENNEDY DRIVE & HINESBURG RCAD (VT. ROUTE 116)
DATE: JULY 1976
APPROACH VEHICLE EXISTING COINDI T ION BALANCED CONDIMiN
MOVEMENT G/C V/C CcPacity (VPtI) G/C V/C Cagaci y WPH)'
tiol Ci1�Srest
iresburg Road St - Rt - Lt 315-'- 65% 348 36% 570 395
�`,,-heast)
annady Drive
St - Rt - Lt
47%
23%
958
43%
257
869
)southeast
Leesburg Road
St - Rt - Lt
31%
35%
413
36°0
3IV
467
3j
Y i
"'•
[[ ,� L
a
=nedy Drive
St - Lt
47%
5 2 %
540
43%
577c
489
I
Rt
47%
6%
675
43%
6%
620
P
,
+
1
L
l
7L—
ti _....
PR -:VAILMG CON'D1 ! IONS: November 27, 1974; Wednesday; P.M. Peak Hour
M/ca")a;,iPy (C)
r, s r b
f_ ,.our
in c; c,'a (C)
`.3
' YI
l -
-51 -
f + nr/L�Cllutti 1111 vw...v.v. --Av-JVYI1l L)jVISjUiV
page 2 TRAFFIC RESEARCH SECT.
I�DIR
PC T
TOT
DIR
PC
T
TOT
DIP
1
/37 7
/39
38
CG
44
/28 //
/.39
47
Z
49
106 Z
/08
49
4
S3
/2-;e
/2-13
<--4
-
6_9__
/26 4
/130
99
z
j o 1
44
`In4I z3 1 777 1 1 --4- i Id I , 1 - !
PLACE:
PC J T
TOT
HR
18
9
-
9
/3
t
10
—
to
/s
I
r 9
-
19
/G
Zz
I
23
1/7
0
Ce
O
V
W
PC T
TOT
DIR
NORTH
zrg3
P
^N lr S -
-a /679 los9 s- 124"-
DIR
I
PC
If75
ICo
10
19
I S
c�
T
Z
1
`
-_
TOT
13
11
10
Iq
8G
7s
e
>Z
I .3
/SS
0/s
S9b `?3
G3/
TOT
TOT
91
4
95
PC T
TOT
DIR
DIR
PC
T
TOT I
/49
j 20
/69
�
/r.3
/Z 2
/4-3
_
-
131
9
iG
I1 S
147
? 3
+
/0
6
9
CO
9z
/9/0 /zo7
� ioi9 ` -
ALP
z9s
t•
12 9
13
14 Z
/4S
/p
M 4
Zo 3
14
13
118
7-1 Co
20-3
9
2/ z
Z/o
—
.
ZU3 I
7
19Z
19
211
947 j 7z
/a/9
TOT
SOT
97S
a4
1os I
PC ; T
TOT
DIR I
DIR I
PC
T
TOT
z3
- I
Z3
33�ss
s 7
7Z�
z
7
/o
/7
j Z
70 I Z
17
4
2/
/,e
I
PC: All passangarcars and 2-ax!e,4--tire trucks
T : IV and heavy trucks and busses. -t
zs9
2C 3 j TOT
TOT
TOT i
GO
31 1
91
DIR
( PC
I T
I TOT
I DIR
I PC ! T i TOT
DIR
i PC
i T
TOT JHR
+
i
i
'
Z/
—
z/
33
z S
/
2G
4Z
3
-c' S
Is-/
2
/ 7
/3
8
/
9
��
/
37
-
7
/Z
_
z
//
/3
/S
3 5
-
3 S
z8
/
z 9
9
7
/G
/4.
z
2 Z
/o
S
/.5'
1,17
I TOLL_ 7
4
93
TOT
/88
TOT
41
SS
9G
RICHARD A. SPOKES
JOSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI
William G. Livingston
SPOKES 8 OBUCHOWSKI
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
P. O. BOX 2325
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402
November 12, 1979
Mr. David Spitz
City Planner
1175 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Windridge Apartments
Dear David:
1775 WILLISTON ROAD
TELEPHONE (802) 863-2857
At your request, I have reviewed the Windridge Apartments site
plan to determine how the emergency access easement and side-
walk easement can be legally implemented. I recommend the
following in connection with the emergency access easement:
1. The developer should furnish the City with an Offer of
Irrevocable Dedication.
2. Simultaneously, the developer should furnish the City with
an executed easement deed and Vermont Property Transfer
Return. The easement deed should run in favor of the City
of South Burlington. It should clearly indicate that the
City has the legal ability to convey the easement to
another party. It should specify the purposes of the ease-
ment as being for municipal emergency vehicles, etc. If
the easement is not intended to benefit the Windridge
Apartments' complex, perhaps it would be appropriate to
include a provision in the deed that the Windridge developer
has no responsibility for improving or maintaining the
easement.
In connection with the sidewalk easement, I think the City would
be ill advised to accept the easement for public use but attempt
to assign the maintenance responsibilities to the developer. I
have misgivings that the City can legally absolve itself from the
responsibility of maintaining a public right-of-way. I also feel
from a practical standpoint that it would be impossible to en-
force the maintenance obligations against the developer. Should
the Planning Commission feel that the pedestrian sidewalk ease-
Mr. David Spitz
November 12, 1979
Page 2
ment is appropriate, I think the City should be prepared to assume
the maintenance responsibilities.
Very truly yours,
Richard A. Spokes
RAS:mi1
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, in triplicate, between Windridge Condo-
miniums, hereafter referred to as Developer, the City of South
Burlington, hereinafter referred to as City, and The Merchants
Bank, hereinafter referred to as Bank.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has received preliminary subdivision
approval dated August 28, 1979 and final subdivision approval
dated 11/27/7q & 5. Z27./g0 from the South Burlington Planning
Commission for the construction and development of Windridge
Condominiums as depicted on a final Plat Plan entitled "
Windridge Apartments, Kennedy Drive, South Burlington, VT project #90510
and
WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approvals, at its
own expense, to complete certain improvements:
Completion of certain landscaping, sidewalks and engin-
eering; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement wish to establish
a Letter of Credit to secure the obligations of the developer
as set forth above; and extension of sewer and water facilities.
WHEREAS, the Bank executes this agreement solely in the
capacity of issuer of the Letter of Credit hereinafter specified.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as
follows:
1. Developer will at its own expense complete the following
improvements in connection with its development:
Completion of certain landscaping, sidewalks and engineering.
2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set
forth in Paragraph One no later than June 12, 1981.
3. For the guaranty of Developers performance of all
requirements hereinabove set forth, Developer and Bank agree
that the sum of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000.00) shall be
available for payment to the City in accordance with the terms
set forth in the Letter of Credit.
4. Said Letter of Credit provides that if the City shall
file with the Bank a statement that Developer is in the judge-
ment of the City in 60 day default under the terms of this
agreement, the Bank shall from time to time pay monies from
said Letter of Credit to the City, in amounts not to exceed a
total enabling the City to complete the improvements and re-
quirements set forth in this agreement.
5. The City will promptly submit to the Developer a
copy of any such statement as it files with the Bank. The
consent of the Developer to such payment by the Bank to the
City shall not be required. The Bank shall incur no liability
to the Developer on account of making such payment to the City,
nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety
of any claim by the City of default on the part of the Developer
or into the use of such funds by the City in completing such
improvements.
6. The City shall not file with the Bank a statement of
default until 60 days after notice has been sent by it to the
Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested, setting
forth its intention to do so.
7. All funds paid to the City pursuant to the Letter of
Credit shall be used by the City soley for the purpose of per-
forming obligations imposed upon the Developer by that portion
-2-
of this agreement upon which the Developer is then in de-
fault. Any work contracted for by the City pursuant hereto
shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and mat-
erial basis, or shall be performed by the City with its own
work force and equipment or shall be accomplished in such
other manner as in the judgment of the City shall accomplish
the work more expeditiously and economically.
8. If payments are made by the Bank to the City pursuant
to the Letter of Credit and if it shall later develop that a
portion of the released monies are suplus to the City's needs,
any such surplus shall be refunded by the City to the Bank to
be held and distributed by the Bank pursuant to the terms of
this agreement.
9. The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such pay-
ments to the City when requested by the City by the appropri-
ate statement, and Developer will not interfere with or hinder
such payments by the Bank to the City. Said statement shall
contain a certificate of compliance with the notice require-
ments of Paragraph 6 of this agreement.
10. This agreement shall terminate and shall be of no
force or effect upon performance of all requirements contem-
plated hereby.
11. Upon request of Developer, but only at the sole dis-
cretion of the City, the City may release a portion of said
funds if the City believes that the retention of said funds
is not necessary to protect its interests after a portion of
said work has been completed. Bank may release such funds only
upon written consent of the City.
-3-
r
12. This agreement shall not only be binding upon the
parties hereto, but also their respective heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns.
Dated this 'G day of 1980.
L r/-{ /9-33,prz: --�
Dev oper
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Its Duly Autho-fiZed Agent
THE MERCHANTS BANK
BY : tit h / go
Its Duly Aut orize Age
i!
M The
Merchants
Bank
MAIN OFFICE: 123 CHURCH STREET, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 802/658-3400
June 12, 1980
City of South Burlington
City Hall
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Letter of Credit #80-16
Windridge Condominiums
Gentlemen:
We hereby open our irrevocable Letter of Credit in your
favor for the account of Windridge Condominiums in the amount
of $60,000.00 U. S., on the following terms and conditions:
1. Payments will be made on this Letter of Credit
seven. days after our receipt of your draft drawn on us,
making specific reference to this Letter of Credit, accom-
panied by your written certification that Windridge
Condominiums, in your judgment, is in sixty (60) day default
under the terms of a certain Agreement among you, Windridge
and the bank, relating to completion of certain landscaping,
sidewalks and engineering in connection with its construction
of Condominiums on Kennedy Drive.
2. The amount of any draft under this Letter of Credit
shall be equal to the amount certified by you to be reasonably
required to perform the obligations imposed upon Windridge by
that portion of the Agreement with respect to which Windridge
is then in dafault.
3. A copy of the statement sent to us under Paragraph 1
shall be sent by you to Windridge at the same time it is
sent to us.
4. The maximum aggregate amount to be paid pursuant to
this letter of Credit shall be $60,000.00.
Page 1 of 2
2.
S. This Letter of Credit shall be in full force and
effect from the date hereof until June 12, 1981, at which time
it shall expire.
ery truly yours,
Dudley H. avis
President
DHD/spm
WIMMME q I1zI-11
CAj
-2� ac
d
STATE OF VERMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # $
REQUEST TO AMEND LAND USE PERMIT #4C0423
NOTICE
TO: All Parties
FROM: Edward R. Schlegel, District Coordinator
SUBJECT: Amendment Request #4C0423-3
On August 4, 1981, the District Environmental Commission received an application
from L.T.H. Associates, 1185 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont, filed under
the provisions of Title 10 VSA, Chapter 151 (Act 250) to amend Land Use Permit
#4C0423 to extend the construction completion date to July 7, 1981.
Any party can request that the District Commission hold a public hearing on this
proposal by notifying this office, 111 West Street, Essex Junction, Vermont,
879-6563, not later than August 21, 1981. If no request for a hearing is filed, the
District Commission may dispose of the case by stipulation, agreed settlement, con-
sent order or default.
If there are any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office im-
mediately.
A P P L I CAT I ON FOR LAN D US E P F RMI T_.AHE ND11ENT
IHSTRLCTIONS:
Use. this Form for all Land Use Permit amendments, including permit transfers.
Applications for permit transfers are to be completed by the transferree.
SECTION I --FW OFFICE USE
Application # ,yCC Filing Date: /
Laws Involved: _— Deemed Complete By:.
Cost: it of -lots: Fee: ---
Deed: Vol . Page(s)
SECTION II - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT
1. APPLICANT: ?�a�
NAME - �- ADDRESS �' p PHONE -.
2. PROPERTY OWNER:,GE
.1/�3— ADDRESS PHONE
3. PERSON TO BE CONTACTED. ABOUT THIS APPLICATION (Complete only if different than 11):
4. WHAT IS YOUR LEGAL INTEREST IN THIS PROPERTY? :
5. IF YOU"ARE NOT FILING THIS' -APPLICATION AS AN INDIVIDUAL; COMPLETE THE FOLL WIN .-
�l_egal Entity date formedd-} St. Date Reg.. in VT
6. WH T 1S JHE.NATIJRE PF THIS REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE PERMIT:
7. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES IN THE FOLLOWING,ITEMS FROM INFORMATION IN THE ORIGINAL
APPLICATION
a. Acreage in the entire tract of land
b. Acreage in this project
c. Date the project will be started =
d. Date the project will be completed
e.-Funding or bonding of this project
f. Municipal services to be used -
SECTION III - ADDITIONAL -INFORMATION REQUIRED ON PERMIT TRANSFERS
8. TRANSFERREE:
I hereby agree to complete this project asset forth in the application, Findings
of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the Land -Use Permit #- and as
amended above: Transferree)•_-
Q.- TRANSFERROR:; _
I hereby agree to the transfer of Land Use Permit # as set forth
above: - -(Transferror)
SECTION IV - NOTICE TO PARTIES - TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPLICANTS FOR ACT 250 PROJECTS
10. This application must be signed by the applicant. By signing this application
the applicant assumes responsibility.for the information provided and, when the
amendment involves Act 250,.confirms that the town selectmen, Planning Commission'
and Regional Planning Commission were given a copy of the application as
required.
- - _ Signat of Applicant S4,
3�
v
L.T.H. Associates
1165 SHELBURNE ROAD. S. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 to 0$1 864-7444
Mr. Ed Stanak
Environmental Coordinator
State of Vermont
111 West Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Dear Mr. Stanak:
August 3, 1981
RE: Letter Dated 6/22/81
ACT 250 - #4C0423
In answer to your letter of June 22, 1981 in regard to the violations
of the Act 250 permit #4C0423, I will list below each item number and our
explanation as to why it differs from the original permit.
ITEM I - Construction took longer than planned for but is now
completed.
ITEM 2 - The electrical sub -station was not planned for, but
was made necessary to have a central cutoff for each
group of six units in a cluster. Al -Gam Electric
and David Kenyon, Vermont Electrical Inspector, agreed
upon the present setup and location. In an effort
to improve the appearance, we have constructed a
redwood fence around the meters and transformer
and planted bushes recommended by our landscaper.
ITEM 3 - In an effort to improve the appearance and get green
grass coverage immediately, we planted sod instead of
grass seed and rearranged the shrubs as directed by
Four Seasons Landscaping, whose letter is enclosed
explaining their reasoning.
ITEP1 4 - The parking lot size and shape was altered slightly
to save several large hardwood trees and also to ac-
commodate Green Mountain Power's transformer.
ITEM 5 - Sidewalks were not put around the parking area be-
cause we felt it would only reduce the amount of green
grass frontage and take away from the appearance
of the project. We felt it would be better to walk
to the rear of the parking space and then walk
either left or right, rather than take four feet of
green grass which would leave an average of ten feet of
frontage and the beech trees would have to be removed.
AUG 0 :, 1981
0
Ed Stanak Page 2 July 31, 1981
ITEM 6 - The plantings of shrubbery in the island were left
in the hands of Four Seasons Landscaping to come up
with a pleasing and maintainable plan for the future
as well as the present. (See attached letter from Four
Seasons Landscaping.)
ITEM 7 - The building had to be redesigned in the front of the
"V" because of problems encountered in erection. The
change was made necessary because of roof and floor joist
span restrictions.
ITEM 8 - The parking light installed is not the same as
Exhibits 17 and 20. At the time, it was going to
take too long to get and install, so, for expedience
sake, we had the existing one installed.
ITEM 9 - The screening around the dumpster has been completed.
ITEM 10- The entrance sign has been installed.
In regard to the culvert, I spoke to our excavator, Rodney Reynolds,
who gave the following explanation: Because of the position of the elec-
trical transformer, it was necessary to make a bend around the transformer
on that side of the road. To accomplish this, he used 15" flexible corrugated
plastic pipe. The pipe under the road is 15" corrugated metal and only the
short section near the transformer is plastic.
Because of the minor nature of the above changes, we did not think
it was necessary to 'get amendments to our 250 Land Use Permit. We apologize
for the misconception and submit this explanation, print and letter from
the landscaper along with our application for Land Use Permit Amendment.
Thank you.
Yours truly,
George Martone
Controller
for L.T.H. Associates
G�i: as
0:: Richard Ward
James Dodge
Environmental
---lo ism-1 0
-}, b/Q25 � = "�/ �• 2 v� cam' �Z
S.L'�o��-e Obi = jrb• X •�•%�/ 0 5'2'� ��'4 Li � ���� •��
l A -A> a
:E�"t W4 aL �;, L"zl'r;� 40 -�-Llvl1o�
Cci1d� 9 �►0�-3C11�I Qdr 47, -AO — 'CroWir,
311� ix-� r�-1.�C1171� �„ �Sl�'� -- ���I1q� '�+� •� vr�a.L� � �l�'�� L - vrAtL GL �d -r-
- _ -��-ram-.,, � .v,� �-�;}� ��n•�--
rc# tJ cal - 0j- ' 41O 0"11 — <TaLv cC7 -3:A (2L --aa-A -79-71 •
"M
LAP qt-157 ,,
1-7
op
� suit
FEINL8> e-gVAC A� 'K.A4-44--
r*v- u g.o.w --isdt
�o� C� f��✓t�
-� L ,v
s Vie! Lul-411"-A- ok-- Aff �� you �Ft�t1�lN�
P c - D"�VV�T v aAA L. Llcr --co ve�!,P- — cf4-T 70 sa c- -W
apa�T��►-IT'S
FDfZEST P41?-1,
P-F�T``
NO2T1-}
1'�= 4C6t
JOB K jj 9it.IP&E
SHEET NO. �o OF
CALCULATED BY [�' Q• �• DATE%
CHECKED BY DATE
FORM 204 Available from iNC Townseod.Mass 01470
STATE OF' VERMONT
INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
RE: L.T.H. Associates ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION NO.,IP
17 Apartment units )
South Burlington, Vermont ) APPLICATION NUMBER 4CO423
JANUARY 21, 1980
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Environmental
Conservation, State of Vermont in the above captioned matter.
PRE -HEARING COMMENTS
Enclosed are comments of the Vermont Agency of Transportation.
The state requests that the comment of the Agency of Transportation be
included as a condition in any permit issued in this matter.
Interagency Act 250 Review Committee could find no information in
the application with regard to the source of heat for the proposed
apartments. The Public Service Board staff attempts to discourage the
use of standard electric baseboard resistance heat. This form of heat
source has the effective increasing peak demands, which in turn affects
all rate payers on a particular utility. The Public Service Board staff
encourages the use of other forms of heat, including off-peak storage and
off-peak utility use.
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
and PRE -HEARING COMMENTS was sent by U.S. Mail (Postage Prepaid) to all
statutory parties.
Dated this 21st day of January, 1980 at Montpelier, Vermont.
Respectfully submitted,
STATE OF VERMONT
INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
By
Stephen B. Sease, Administrator
Land Use & Development
"- .. City of South Burlington
..� 575 DORSET STREET
�=-- SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PLANNER
863.2882
February 2, 1982
Edward R. Schlegel
District 4 Environmental Commission
111 West Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Dear Mr. Schlegel,
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658.2486
I will E• unable to i-it.tond Fridays's hearingon the Wi.ndridge tx-rmit
amendments. However, 1 do want to advise you that the 8 foot wide parking
spaces, as referenced in the recent correspondence on Windridge, do not
comply with South Burlington's parking standards.
I have had one conversation with the developer's representative on this
matter, and I hope to be able to achieve a solution with them so that the
development will not be in violation of local permits.
Sincerely,
David H. Spitz,
City Planner
DS/mcg
STATE OF VERMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # 4
TO: All Parties ,�q
FROM: Edward R. Schlegel (��
District Coordinator C
DATE: January 13, 1982
SUBJECT: Land Use Permit Amendments #4C0423-1 and #4C0423-3
LTH Associates - Windridge Condominiums
At the request of involved parties, a hearing on the above Land
Use Permit Amendments has been scheduled for 1:00 P.M. on
Friday, February 5, 1982 at the Chittenden County Regional
Planning Commission, 55 Pearl Street, Essex Junction, Vermont.
If there are any questions regarding this matter, please con-
tact this office immediately.
State Office Building
Montpelier, Vermont 05602
828-3345
ERS:lg
575 Dorset Street
June 11, 1981
Associates
c/o John Larl-.in
1185 SllelbUVVG Roa6
South Btrl-injton, 'vc-_,rjijojt 054o1
PE: _7.'scrow P.-(irecriont
,indri(_!ge Apartr,,,onts, Project
Drive
Coutli Jurlinc _jtc)n, yerlort
Dear John:
This is to infori,11 you t'j,.a,'_- to date the worh s2ecifjed for
C 0- IOUO& of t.,c all_,ove rofercnced, gbrc)-joct I -,.at !_;r-.,en co.rarletec-1
7D 1
and accepted 7 the City, therefore t1hE_;, Agrecrient sated June 16, 1980
I I I is ill def Oult.
"T I
islb
c.c. Merchants Bank
Etban Allen, Jr.
Very truly yours,
'd1liai-, J. E7.,3v,,,iansj,_.4 1-
City Manac..jer
m
STATE OF VERMONT
INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
RE: L.T.H. Associates ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION NO. IV
Change Windridge Apartments to )
Windridge Condominiums ) APPLICATION AMENDMENT NUMBER 4C0423-1
South Burlington, Vermont )
AUGUST 31 1980
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Environmental Conservation,
State of Vermont in the above captioned matter.
PRE -HEARING COMMENTS
The InterAgency Act 250 Review Committee reviewed the above captioned matter
and had no adverse comments.
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Agency ENTRY OF APPEARANCE and
PRE -HEARING COMMENTS was sent.by U.S. Mail (Postage Prepaid) to all statutory
parties.
Dated on this 3rd day of August, 1980 at Montpelier, Vermont.
Respectfully submitted,
STATE OF VERMONT
INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
By -00, - Q_.. I
Catfute E. Dalmasse, Director
Division of Protection
ACT 250 NOTICE
AMEN11IFNT APPLICATION
10 V.SA, §6083-6088
Amendment application #4C0423-1 was filed by L.T.H. Associates, 1185 Shelburne
Road, South Burlington, Vermont, on July 21, 1980, to change Windridge Apartments
to 11,'indridge Condominiums and to revise the parking lot plan. for 17 units off of
Kennedy Drive in South Burlington, Vermont.
This project will be evaluated in accordance with the 10 environmental criteria
of 10 VSA, 96086(a). Statutory parties to this application are the municipality,
the municipal planning commission, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission,
and affected State agencies. Adjoining property owners may participate to the ex-
tent the proposal will have a direct effect on their property under the 10 criteria.
Other persons may participate at the discretion of the District Commission. If
you wish to participate, please contact the Coordinator for further information
before the first hearing or date as specified below.
Any party can request that the District Commission hold a public hearing on
this proposal by notifying this office not later than July 28, 1980. If no request
for a hearing is filed, the District Commission may dispose of the case by stipu-
lation, agreed settlement, consent order or default.
BY
Susan H. Cain, District Coordinator
Ill West.Street, Essex Junction
879-6563
July 21 , 1980
$POKES & OBUCHOWSKI
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
P. O. Box 2325
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
RICHARD A. SPOKES
JOSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI
WILLIAM G. LivINGSTON
STEVEN F. STITZEL
June 19, 1980
Edward J. Cashman, Esq.
P. G. Box 602
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Res Windridge Apartments
Dear Ed:
1775 WILLISTON ROAD
TELEPHONE (802) 863-2857
The documents you sent me on May 26, 1980 for this project are
fine with one exception. The City's practice is to accept
warranty deeds and not quitclaim deeds. Since you are dealing
with the sovereign you will not question this custom. Perhaps
you can have the two deeds retyped on warranty deed form, along
with two Vermont Property Transfer Returns. All documents,
including the Offer of Dedication, should be duly executed and
sent to David Spitz, the City Planner.
If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
Richard A. Spokes
RAS:mil
cc: David Spitz �✓
City Planner
f ` City of South Burlington
1175 WILLISTON ROAD
_ - SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
TEL.863.2891
June 9, 1980
Mr. John Larkin
1185 Shelburne Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
This letter is formal notification that on May 27, 1980, the South
Burlington Planning Commission approved your revised final plat application
for the 17-unit Windridge project on Kennedy Drive. A copy of the minutes
with stipulations is enclosed. Please also note the following requirements:
1) In addition to the milar copy of your final plat, two paper copies
must be submitted.
2) Bonding, recreation and other fees as required.
3) If the units are to be condominiums, change the title from Windridge
"Apartments."
Sincerely,
/Lwff, -S�
David H. Spitz,
City Planner
DS/mcg
cc: Steve Page
N� AGer
or'riCL 01 •ri:E SLCRETARY
la3 Sluts 5tr�:ct, Nlontpuhur, Vermont 05602
POFt January 16, 1980
Act 250 Administrator
Agency of Environimental Conservation
Division of Environmental ProL:ction
Montpelier, Vermont 05602
NOTICE OF -APPLICATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL DISTRICT
Re: App. #4CO423, L.T.H. Associates, South Burlington
Dear Sir:
Pursuant. to the provisions of Act 250 of the 1970 Legislature,
Environi,tental Board and District Comirissions, the Agency of Trans-
portation has reviewed the above -referenced Notice and offers the
following:
I� I No adverse comment
LX Our comments are as follows:
Water and sewage should be bored and sleeved under Kennedy Drive
and not open cut. Obtain access permit from local authorities.
Sincerely,
Ronald L. W. Crisman
Secretary
J,VIqa
By: S. J. C ge/ —
Director of Engineering and
Construction
Attach.
cc: District Transportation Administrator J. Wood
4.
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEOBER 13, 1979
the character of the neighborhood, did not like the irregular shape of the lot,
felt there were safety problems and traffic problems and noted that this would
create more than the 50 units called for in the Regulations. Mr. Woolery did
not like the crooked lot lines or the change in the character. Mr. Draper agreed
with the above arguments. He agreed with Mr. Jacob that using the cul-de-sac as
a defense was not fair, since it was desired by the residents. Mr. Poger did
not want to set a precedent for other duplexes on the street and did not want to
create another lot on a street which is as long and narrow as this.
The motion to deny carried unanimously.
Public hearing on final plat application of L.T.H. Associates for a 17 unit
apartment project Windridge Apartments at 2-00 Kennedy Drive -
Mr. Poger noted the return of the prodigal son, Steve Page, who tonight
wore a "black hat" and represented LTH.
;Ir. Page said a landscaping plan had been shown. As many mature hardwoods
as possible will be saved. There will be one light in the parking area and some
entryway lighting. The City Engineer has asked for more information on storm
drainage. ti
The issue of the sidewalk was discussed and it was noted that the topography
of the area was hard to deal with, since the land sloped down from the curb of
the road rapidly. The applicant has shown the sidewalk running across about 112
the frontage of the property, but on the west, where there are two large ravines,
the walk diverts off the right of way onto private property and contains two
wooden footbridges over the ravines and some steps. Kr. Ewing noted that such a
sidewalk could not be maintained in the winter. Mr. :-Iona was aware that the
Natural Resources Committee did not want any filling done, but he wanted to keep
the option open anyway. Mr. `rage said the amount of fill necessary would depend
on how far from the road the sidewalk were constructed. The farther away, the
more fill needed. For the fill alone, with 10' between curb and sidewalk, the
cost would be almost S10,000. At 5', it would be about i�5-7,000. The cost of
the sidewalk is about $3,000. The Commission did not like the sidewalk as
proposed, and Mr. Mona suggested that a sidewalk 4-5' from the curb over the
ravines be considered. It could be the full 10' where fill was not needed.
Mr. Page then noted that this sidewalk would not connect to anything on either
side and proposed that money be earmarked for sidewalk construction when property
to the east or west is developed. If the fill were put in now, it could settle
for a while before the City took the money from the escrow account and built the
sidewalk. Mr. Poger raised the issues of inflation devaluing the money left for
the sidewalk and the issue of a developer selling the property as'condominiums,
for example and then disclaiming responsibility to live up to conditions of approval.
In the meantime the condominium owners also disclaim responsibility. He asked the
Planner to look into stipulations which bar a developer from selling before
stipulations are met. Also on that subject, he asked the Commission to consider
nct approving any development proposed by a developer who has done what is described
above, such as ICV, until all stipulations have been met, to the satisfaction of
the Commission.
A light at the curb cut to the property was suggested, for safety reasons.
The emergency access to the adjoining property was shown. It is in the form
of an easement. This developer does not want this to be a major access when the
property on that side is developed. They show a 30' easement for emergency access
with a gate provision to be maintained by others. The access is then available to
the next developer. M.r. "roger said the easement could be there without paving or
a gate until the next developer went in, but he felt there should be some cost to
this developer. i:r. rage felt this site did not need the access and said the next
5.
PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEAMER 5. 1979
developer could make the improvements and maintain it. Mr. Woolery did not want
that access open until the Commission, City Engineer,,,and Fire and Police Chiefs
could agree on how to handle it. Mr. O'Bryan felt the abutting development could
maintain the easement since it was so short on this developer's side. Mr. Mona
felt the note on the drawing relating to the access should be removed. It was
suggested that there be a simple recording of the right of way. Mr. Poger said
the easement should be provided as the City Attorney suggests.
Mr. Page said they had looked at the two nearest sigr_allized intersections to
this project - Williston Road and Kennedy Drive, and Hinesburg Road and Kennedy
Drive. He said that traffic consultant Bruce Houghton's analysis of the capacity
of those intersections is based on a one hour count on January 9.0 The applicants
observed the intersection themselves for 4,1/2 hour periods and found it not to be
as congested as Mr. Houghton suggests. Mr. Page noted that they had not calculated
the capacity or the range of service. Air. Woolery noted that this development
would not affect the left turn movement from Hinesburg Road onto Kennedy but said
it would affect the left turn off Williston Road onto Kennedy, both of which
movements are at high capacities according to Mr. Houghton. It was suggested that
left turn arrows be put in place before the application was approved. Mr. Page
felt the intersections were not at level D. At Hinesburg Road, he said they
looked at 41 cycles and no car waited through a signal change to get through.
The average was 4 cars through during a cycle, the maximum was 8, and 10;t of the
cycles had no traffic going through. The traffic study for the project, done by
Land Plan Inc. shows that only one car will come from the Williston -Kennedy
intersection, where Mr. Houghton shows it is not lower than level C service.
Mr. Woolery felt this developer was putting an exceptionally costly sidewalk
in and he felt left turn arrows were an imposition on top of that cost.
Mr. Mona moved to continue the public hearing on the final plat application
of L.T.H. Associates for a 17 unit apartment project at 200 Kennedy Drive to
two weeks from tonight, November 27, at City Hall, at 7:30 pm. Mr. Ewing seconded
the motion and it carried with Messrs. Jacob and Woolery voting no.
Public hearing on final plat a nlicaticn of the Glenwood Corporation for Phase
II 109 condominium units of the Jtonehed a development.
Mr. Page said the area in question was 43 acres, of which 7 were deeded to
the City for parkland. It is zoned R4 and final plat approval has been given for
phase 1 (92 units). The applicants are aware that the City has made application
for federal funding for a land swap and purchase of some property and if that
happens they will come to the Commission for approval of buildings and parking.
Walkways will be constructed from the buildings to parking areas and detailed
construction drawings will be given to the staff in City Hall. Buildings will
be constructed as shown on the plan, and detailed drawings will be given to the
City before building permits are issued. Additional access points to the loop
road, asked for by the Fire Chief, have been shown. They propose that the loop
road in this phase be the same asin phase 1 - 20' pavement with gravel base and
5' shoulders on both sides. There is room for a 60' right of way in phase 1 and in
phase 2 also. It was mentioned that if the Commission wanted City street standards
in phase 2, it could also ask for them in phase 1. Mr. Page noted that the first
cluster of units was built in 1975 and is served by a private road. No requests
have been made to the City to charge the status of that road. Phase 1 is 112
completed, Mr. Page said. The City :-Tanager has suggested public streets.
Mr. ions felt 20' streets were inadequate. Making the streets public was
discussed. The base necessary to widen the streets exists. The Commission did
not feel curbs were necessary, and a 24' pavement width was mentioned. There
is parking provided within the clusters and none will be on the streets.
3.
PLANNING COMMISSION
Mr. Mona did not feel the city had the best solutions here.
The motion carried with Messrs. Mona and Jacob voting no.
Sketch plan review of application of Jame
subdivision 10 acres at 1435 Dorset Str
and Dolores Scanl
MAY 27, 1980
lot
Mr. Scanlon said he owned 49 acres of land and proposed to break it into
2 parcels - one of 10 acres and a home, and the other of undeveloped land.
They wish to sell the 10 acre parcel, but have no plans for the remaining land.
Ins. Spitz said the city's highway plan showed 3 future roads in the Quadrant,
and one of them would run across the north boundary of this land. Lots on this
acreage would front on the proposed road. He also said that the way the plan
was drawn, he was not sure they were not creating a third lot to the rear of the
one to be sold.
Yx. Scanlon was told he might have to provide a 60' right of way for the
proposed road.
Mr. Spitz brought up the question of a public road. He felt that if the
Commission wanted to encourage development in the Quadrant contiguous to
developed areas, they should require public streets after the first house. It
was noted that it is now the Commission's policy to require a public street
after the fourth lot. The cut-off point after which a public road would be
constructed was discussed further. Mr. Woolery felt that requiring a street
for less than 5 lots would create an undue burden, but Xr. Spitz felt that if
the public street were required only after the fourth lot, there would be a lot
of 10 acre parcels created in the Quadrant. The Commission will discuss this
issue again at a later time.
The Commission did not object to what Mr. Scanlon proposed. He was told
that it was possible that when he sold the back lot, he would be required to
put in a public street.
Mr. Jacob felt the plan as drawn was fine. He felt Mr. Scanlon should
own the 60' right of way shown on the plan to the back lot.
Mr. Poger felt there were three lots, not two, being created here.
Revised final plat application by John Larkin for a new parking layout for
Windridge Apartments on Kennedy Drive
Mr. Page said the units would probably be condominiums and Mr. Poger suggested
a name change for the project, in that case. Mr. Page said site work had started
on the project and that when the site was being cleared, it became apparent that
a number of mature trees between the parking lot and Kennedy Drive would be
removed. The developer wants to keep those trees, so a revised plan has been
submitted. This new plan has met with the approval of the Fire Chief. It shows
a gravel access to the road in addition to the main access. The City Engineer/
Manager has reservations about maintenance of that second access. The proposed
change does not affect the number of parking spaces or the utilities. They have
made the parking stalls 9' wide and increased the aisle width. Snow storage will
be on the perimeter of the lot.
The Commission felt that the idea of emergency accesses was great, but they
noted that they have not had any success with any of them.
Mr. Page said he had an alternate plan and he showed it to the commission.
This plan is much the same, except the interior island has been isolated, he said.
The parking area has been pulled back 20' from Kennedy Drive, and there is one
more space, with the same 9' width. Mr. Spits said the Fire Chief has seen the
plan, and it will require him to back up his trucks, but he said he can do that.
PLANNING COMMISSION
4.
MAY 27, 1980
He has not seen the plan on paper, I4r. Spitz said, but he has agreed to the
concept of backing his trucks out after a fire.
Mr. Ewing suggested that the center island be left with a 4" curb, so the
Chief could take his trucks over it if he needed to.
Two hydrants will be installed.
The commission members liked this plan much better. It shows 38 parking
spaces. Mr. Page said the storage parking spaces could be designated.
Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve
the revised final plat of John Larkin for a new parking layout for the Windridge
project on Kennedy Drive, subject to the following stipulations.
1. That the Fire Chief shall approve the location of the second fire
hydrant.
2. The final plot plan shall be filed within 90 days, and shall depict
the revised parking layout of 38 spaces, with at least 3 storage spaces.
3. The stipulations of November 27 1979 shall remain in effect.
Air. Ewing seconded the motion and all voted aye.
Continue review of edited Comprehensive Plan
Mr. Spitz gave the members some proposed changes to various chapters.
Housing - page 9 - Mr. Mona moved to remove the second sentence on that
page and also table 5. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion, which carried with
Mr. Poger voting no.
On page 17, at the May 20 meeting a suggestion had been made for wording
regarding the city's role in homeowners association bylaws. Mr. Spitz was not
sure the wording reflected actual practice. Mr. Woolery felt the city should
review and be a party to such documents where its interests were at stake.
Mr. Spitz felt the following wording should be used: "The City Attorney
shall review and approve provisions of homeowners association bylaws and
declarations in matters which relate to the public interest." The Commission
agreed to that.
Natural Resources - Mr. Spitz had checked into the University's policy
regarding undeveloped land it owned in certain areas of the city. The trustees
have stated in a pamphlet that for the time being and the forseeable future those
areas will be protected. Mr. Spitz will check further.
Transportation - page 45a - Mr. Spitz proposed to add as a recommendation:
"Develop a new corridor (The South Burlington Southern Connector Extension) from
Shelburne Road to the proposed Burlington Southern Connector." The Commission agreed.
Southeast quadrant - Mr. Spitz noted that the Commission had wanted a
statement in the Development Management Chapter to appear in this chapter also.
He has added it to #2 (recommendation).
Development Management - Mr. Jacob noted that the plan stated that
development could only occur in conformance with the city's ability to provide
services. He felt that the city must not shirk its responsibility to provide
such services and proposed to add a sentence to that effect. Hr. Yona moved
to remove the last sentence in the new portion of that chatter instead. kr.
Jacob seconded the motion and all voted for it.
Mr. Spitz said the date for the warned hearing on the Plan would be June 17.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 Pm -
Clerk
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: Next Week's Agenda -
Date: May 23, 1980
3) Thibault Development, Cottage Grove Avenue
a) Drainage
The developers recommendation for installation of a 24' pipe to carry the storm
drainage is not adaquate enough to carry the anticipated runoff. In the
engineering report, copy attached, it states that a 24" pipe will handle an
area of approximately 10 acres however, the drainage area is approximately
25 acres. The pipe size southerly across Williston Road, Hinesburg Road
and Grand Union parking lot is 24' diameter and at a flat slope. A larger
pipe than a 24' through this development would be of no use unless this
bottleneck is eliminated. I still feel this area serves as a reservoir or
holding pond for excessive runoff until the 24' pipes down streams acccxtmodates
the flow. An alternate if development of the land is permitted is an open ditch.
I suspect the adjacent land will be periodically inundated.
b) Curbs and Road widening
Concrete curbs are desireable because they control street drainage and save
on maintenance. The paved width of Cottage Grove is 20' to 22' which will
necessitate parking at least partly in the shoulder area resulting in ruts
and pavement edge breaks. The Peterson building has the 5 foot pavement
widening. It could continue along this development and taper to the existing
width of pavement at the north-easterly end.
5) Windridge")
An emergency access road without depressed curbs would be very difficult for
snow plowing unless it was done with a front end loader which would require
extreme care not to upset the curbs. Any piece of snow removal equipment
other than a front end loader would require plowing the snow into Kennedy
Drive.This poses a safety problem and is against City ordinances.
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Davis H. Spitz, City Planner
Re: Next Week's Agenda
Date: 5/23/80
2) Comprehnsive Plan
The Commission has approved all chapters of the Plan except Housing.
I will have the requested information for this chapter plus a minor change in
the Transportation Chapter and possibly Development Management chapter by
Tuesday's meeting. I anticipate that this item may be shorter than some
of the other agenda items and recommend that it be discussed first.
3) Thibault - Cottage Grove
A more detailed explanation of Mr. Szymanski's arguements regarding drainage
and road improvements for the application is enclosed. I have contacted the
applicant's lawyer and surveyor to attempt to resolve these issues and have
not received a satisfactory response. Unless these items have been resolved
before Tuesday's meeting I recommend that the hearing be continued until the
next Planning Commission meeting.
4) Scanlon - 1435 Dorset Street
A vicinity map and map of the proposed subdivision are enclosed. One of
the City's proposed future roads across the Southeast Quadrant lies along the
northern boundary of this property. The applicant's proposed lot is laid out
so as to include the existing house, to be served for the present by a right-
of-way over the existing driveway, and to eventually be served by the public
road.
The Planning Commission has the power to approve a lot without public road
frontage. Issues to be resolved are when public road improvements should be
required and what is the status of the land to the west of the proposed lot
(i.e. can it be considered part of the remaining 39.14 acre lot). Also, the
possibilty for cluster arrangements and smaller lot sizes should be explored.
5 Windr idge
Applicant is requesting a revised parking area to allow the retention of
a row of trees in front of the lot. The Fire Chief will not accept the
smaller parking lot unless a second entrance is provided. The applicant has
proposed a gravel emergency access with curb intact to prevent residential use.
Mr. Szymanski's objections are enclosed. I would add that it may be difficult
to enforce winter plowing of the gravel access.
A second option which I have explored with both the applicant and the
Fire Chief is to keep the original triangle shape of the parking lot but to
shorten it by 20 feet on the Kennedy Road side. The center island would
have to be relocated. This arranement would satisfy the Fire Chief's requirement
that a second truck have room to maneuver past the first even in a full parking
lot. The ability for fire trucks to exit without backing up would be lost,
Memorandum
Re: Next Week's Agenda
5/23/80
Page 2
but that is a lesser objection.
It should be noted that several parties of the City have conflicting goals
here - the Planning Commission's goal to limit accesses and to preserve trees,
the Fire Chief's goal for high -quality fire protection and the City Manager's
concerns for proper street maintenance. Each arguement must be given careful
scrutiny to produce the best overall result for the City.
6) Other Business.
Burlington has filed an Act 250 application for the Southern connector.
I would like to get the Planning Commission's input prior to the pre -hearing
on June 11.
�vut4 Nurtiugtvu Nire Department
f 575 i9arset street
auto Nurlingtan, Urrmant 05401
OFFICE OF
JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR.
CHIEF
January 7,1980
Mr. Sidney Poger Chairman
South Burlington City Planning Commission
1175 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Poger,
On Friday January 40980 plans were reviewed on the plans
for the windridge apartments to be built on Kennedy Drive. The
last revieions were made on December 19,10,79 which are marked
on the plan.
In my opinion I feel the facilities are being installed so
we can give proper fire protection. I would like to bring to
your attention that :cost of the new construction has the proper
facilities in there developments for fire protection but in no
way has the fire department itself grown with equipment and
man power to meet the needs of the new construction.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at
863-6455.
Sincerely
*;'/�"--�Goddette
zSr. Chief
December 10, 1979
Mr. Stephen Page
�J. Dubois & King
159 Pearl Street
Essex Junction, Vermont U5452
Dear Steve:
The L.T.h. application for a 17 unit apartment complex on Kennedy
Drive, entitled "Windridge Apartments", was recently approved by the
South Burlington Planning Commission.
D The proposed development is in conformance with the South burlington
Comprehensive Plan.
Sincerely,
David fl. Spitz,
�V7 City Planner
DS/mcg
ACT 250 NOTICE
APPLICATION AND HEARING
10 VSA, 06083-6088
Application #4C0423 was filed by L.T.H. Associates, 1185
Shelburne Road, South Burlington, on January 9, 1980, for the
construction of 17 apartment units on 2.19 acres off of Kennedy
Drive in South Burlington, Vermont.
This project will be evaluated in accordance with the 10
environmental criteria of 10 VSA, 36086(a).
A public hearing is scheduled for Friday, February 1, 1980,
at 3 PM at the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission,
58 Pearl Street, Essex Junction.
BY
Susan If. Cain, District Coor inator
For the District #4 Commission
111 Nest Street, Essex Junction
879-6563
January 9, 1980
SHC/tg
DS
11/27/79
STIPULATIONS AND/OR FACT FINDING
WINDRIDGE APARTMENTS
For the Final Plat application of L.T.H. Associates for a 17 unit apart-
ment project at 200 Kennedy Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Windridge
Apartments - Final Plat", last revised 11/19/79, prepared by Ronald O'Bryan.
Stipulations:
1. The developer shall provide acceptable legal documents for the easement
between the entrance drive and the abutting property, as specified in City
Attorney Richard Spokes' letter of November 12, 1979 prior to the issuance of
any permit.
"11 "Y
2. Depressed curbing shall be provided across the entire width of the drive-
way entrance.
3. A recreation fee of $1332 shall be paid.
4. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days.
Y A l qn 4 rh boy � � at ie4sf _5 QG' still b � �o�o��Jel
Py
pus vythheii weefs`/ the
s/ es. al
T �s aQu�f
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 27, 1979
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, November 27,
1979 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 1175 Williston Road
Members Present
Ernest Levesque, Vice Chairman; George Mona, Kirk Woolery, Peter Jacob, Robert
Walsh
Members Absent
Sidney roger, Chairman; James Ewing
Others Present
David Spitz, Planner; Homer Dubois, Robert Krebs, Lance Llewellyn, Steve Page,
John Larkin, Douglas Schner, C.W. Gregory, David Okin, Lowell Krassner
Minutes of November 26, 1979
On page 3, in the first sentence of the second paragraph under Southeast
Quadrant, insert the word "industrial" between "as" and "commercial".
The motion to approve the November 20, 1979 minutes as corrected was made
by Mr. Jacob, seconded by Mr. Walsh and carried with Mr. Mona abstaining.
tinuation of public hearin on final plat application of L.T.H. Associates
7 ,inif Anxrtment Project Windrid e Apartdy Drive
Mr. Page said the revised plan.showed a typical city sidewalk for the full
frontage of the property. Storm drainage is shown clearly and the emergency access
notation now reads "30' easement for emergency access". The City Engineer has
reviewed the drainage and approved it. A depressed curb will be put in across
the driveway. The applicants will go through bonding or escrow for the improvements,
Sewer and water mains will be public. Cost of the plantings is $2500 and they
feel that is adequate. An illuminated sign has been added at the entrance, which
will have concealed lighting from the top.
Mr. Mona wanted to see the fill contours. Mr. Page said the fill would
match the existing slope and that the culvert would be extended.
Mr. Walsh did not like filling in the CO zone but was told the Commission
had looked at other possibilities for the sidewalk and none seemed as good as this.
Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve
the final plat application of L.T.H. Associates for a 17 unit rt nt
at 200 KeinedyDrive as depicted on a Plan entitled "Windridge Apartments - Final
_Plat", last revised 11 19 79, prepared by Ronald O'Bryan, subject to the followinc
stipulations:
1. The developer shall provide acceptable legal documents for the easement
between the entrance drive and the abutting property, as specified in City Attorney
Richard Spokes' letter cf November 12, 1979 prior to the issuance of any building
permit.
2. Depressed curbing shall be provided across the entire width of the driveway
entrance.
3. A recreation fee of Z1332 shall be paid.
2.
PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 27, 1979
4. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days.
5. A landscaping bond of at least $2500 shall be provided: this amount plus
the existing vegetation_ meets the landscaping requirement.
6. The plan of record shall be revised to show contour changes, especially
as affected by the fill for the sidewalk in the CO district.
Mr. Jacob seconded the motion.
I.1r. Page noted that everything shown on the plan, the developer was bound to.
The motion carried without dissent.
Continuation of public hearin_ on final plat applic
for phase II 109 condominium units)of the Stonehe
>f the blenwood Corporation
evelopment
Mr. Page said the Fire Chief had asked for access points from the clusters
to the loop road and that on 3 out of the 7 clusters it had not been feasible to
do that. One already had two access points and two, if connected, would have
roads with slopes of 14-15/t, which is not safe. There will be a turnaround within
cluster J and the Chief has said he can live with this plan.
A typical city street road has been shown on the plan with 24' of pavement
and a 30' base. 60' of right of way has been given for the road all the way around
the site and the new road will tie into the end of the existing loop road in phase
I. The developers want to upgrade the phase I road in stages and it will match
the new road (24' pavement, 30' base. When the entire road is completed and
inspected, it will be offered to the city, and if accepted, deeded over. An offer
of dedication can be used for this.
The developers agreed to all points of the City Engineer's 11/21/79 memo.
They also noted that in future this development can be connected to land to the
north or south. If the land swap being contemplated in that area goes through,
the project will have to be redesigned. Mr. Page gave the Commission a phasing
schedule (copy attached). There was no problem with this schedule.
Mr. Mona asked that the curbs come out tangent to two parallel lines 30'
apatt by the cul-de-sac. He raised the issue of having so many dwelling units in
an area with one entrance. Mr. Jacob suggested opening Andrews Avenue to solve the
problem. Mr. Page said that when and if the need arose, a right of way could be
extended to either north or south.
A few buildings on the plan are shown on the property line. Mr. Page said
it was the developers intention to get buildings at least 5' from the right of
way. He added that as part of the application the developer was saying that if
a specific plan for a cluster or building is different from what is shown on the
large drawings, they will come back to the Commission, barring an administrative
decision to the contrary.
Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the
final plat application of the Glenwood Corporation for a 109 unit condominium
project, as de icted on a lan entitled "Stonehed e ndominiums_1hase 2,_109
units", last revised 11 16 79, prepared by Ronald O'Bryan, subject to the following
stipulations:
1. Detailed site information for each cluster - including finished building
es(and no building shall be closer than 5' to the 0' right of way), drainare,
sewer, water and road details, walkways and other information, - shall be provlaeo
prior to the issuance of any building permit for that cluster. If the layout of
buildings, parking areas and/or sewer and water lines in any cluster has been
significantly modified, the plan shall be resubmitted for revised final plat approval.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: David Spitz, City Planner
Re: Next Week's Agenda Items
Date: 11/21/79
#2 Windridge Apartments at 200 Kennedy Drive
Sidewalk has been relocated at the fill area to a distagce of 4 feet from
the road. Culvert beneath additional fill will be extended as 'needed. Ill-
uminated sign has been added at the entrance to the property.
#3 Stonehedge, Phase II
Plans for loop road have been upgraded to a 24' paved width and 30' base.
Minor revisions must be made, such as reducing the sharpness of curves (by in-
creasing curve radii from 150' to 200'), so that loop road may be acceptable
as a city etreet.
Second entrances have been added to several clusters as requested by fire
chief to improve accessibility for fire fighting.
#4 McDonald's at 1225 Williston Road
City Attorney's opinion is that McDonald's proposed lease of land from the
Citgo station will increase the degree of nonconformity of the Citgo lot in
violation of the City's zoning regulation. Therefore the City Attorney re-
commends denial of the application.
#5 South Burlington Realty, San Remo Drive
On November 22 1977, the Planning Commission gave site plan approval for
a gymnastics instructional facility at this site. For that type of use a
circular drive was required. However, for the currently proposed warehouse -
commercial building with limited traffic and no children involved, a circular
drive no longer appears necessary
Zoning Board has granted variance to allow fifty foot setback with stip-
ulationg that uses be those permitted in the BPD zone and that parking spaces
be 14 as shown. If applicant requests a conditionaluse, he must return for
Zoning Board review.
Loading dock is in front with sufficient setback for any trailer trucks to
be off the street when unloading. Drainage is towards the front of the lot.
Applicant has left room in parking lot for connection to adjacent undeveloped
lot.
#6 Dubois, 1 lot Subdivision
Proposed new lot is located on the west side of Hinesburg Road across the
road from other lots previouslysubdivded by Dubois. Lot has 203' road frontage
and a depth of 2175, considerably greater than the 5 to 1 length to width
guideline of Section 402 of the Subdivision Regulations.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: Next Week's Agenda Items
Date: 11/21/79
#2 Windridge
1. Plan layout is acceptable.
#3 Stonehedge
1. Road curve radii shall be a minimum of 200 feet and superelevated.
2. Curbs should be constructed in the inside of curves at 15' from center
line to protect road edge.
3. Opening at cul-du-sac should be 30' in width with radii curbed.
#5 South Burlington Realty, San Remo Drive
1. Surface drainage should be intercepted and discharged to the street
storm drainage system. No surface or roof drainage should be allowed to dis-
charge onto adjacant properties.
2. Curb opening shall be constructed with concrete depressed curbing.
#6 Homer Dubois Subdivision, Hinesburg Road
1. This is a subdivision of a large parcel of land on a road that carries
heavy truck traffic. Road opening should be carefully planned. It would be
my preference to see a plan developed for Mr. Dubois's entire parcel with con-
sideration given for future streets and a single road access to Hinesburg Road
possiblv opposite to the R.O.W. that is reserved for a future street when the
east side was sub -divided several years ago.
#7 Gregory& Daughters, Industral Park, Williston Road
1. A turnaround should be provided.
2. A street R.O.W. should be reserved for future continuation of the street
to the R.D.R. property.
3. State Highway permit will be required for access to Williston Road.
4. Sewage disposal will have to be on site unless a pumping station is
installed with a force main to the existing gravity system.
DS
11/13/79
STIPULATIONS AND/OR FACT FINDING -
WINDRIDGE APARTMENTS
For the Final 'elat application of L.T.H. Associates for a 17 unit apart-
ment project at 200 Kennedy Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Windridge
Apartments - Final Plat",'a ll/)9/79 and prepared by Ronald O'Bryan.
FiTIQ
Stipulations:
1. -fie--easement between the entrance drive and the abutting property shall
be labeled "for secondary or emergency access". The developer shall provide
acceptable legal documents, as specified in City Attorney Richard Spokes'
letter of November 12, 197§, prior to the issuance of any zoning permit.
' 2. Where --the public sidewalk enters private property, a connection shall
be provided to the street. The private portion of the walkway shall be
maintained by the developer and adequate lighting shall be installed in the
`wooded area.
Su
'cient grad' g d ail sha�aina`gepa�tn
to the prow of t
City Engi eer, t show the storm a g the eas s' e
of the bui gs.
4. Depressed curbing shall be provided across the entire width of the drive-
way entrance.
S. A recreation fee of $1332 shall be paid.
6. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days.
PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION
The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175
Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, November 13 ,
197_2. at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following:
#1. Final application of Wallace & Margaret Blanchard to subdivide a one (1)
acre lot into two lots (.6 acre and .4 acre) located at 62 East Terrace. The
proposed subdivision is bounded by properties -of Daniel George, George Deforge
and the Quarry Hill Tennis Club.
#2. Final plat application of L.T.H. Associates to construct a 17 unit apartment
complex on a 2.5 acre parcel directly southeast of 200 Kennedy Drive. The proposed
subdivision is bounded by Kennedy Drive on the northwest, and on the east and south
by lands of Forest Park Realty Corporation.
#3. Final plat application of the Glenwood Corporation for subdivision approval of
Phase II of the Stonehedge development; Phase II consists of 109 condominium units,
and is bounded on the west by lands of the City of South Burlington, on the north
by Phase 1, on the east by lands of Campbell,Blanchard, Mellish, Lawlor an
Koplewitz and on the south by lands of Nowland.
Copies of the applications are available
for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall.
Sidney B. Poger
Chairman
South Burlington
Planning Commission
October 27, 1979
DS
11/13/79
STIPULATIONS AND/OR FACT FINDING -
WINDRIDGE APARTMENTS
For the Final Plat application of L.T.H. Associates for a 17 unit apart-
ment project at 200 Kennedy Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Windridge
Apartments - Final Plat", dated 11/6/79 and prepared by Ronald O'Bryan.
Stipulations:
1. The easement between the entrance drive and the abutting property shall
be labeled "for secondary or emergency access". The developer shall provide
acceptable legal documents, as specified in City Attorney Richard Spokes'
letter of November 12, 1979, prior to the issuance of any zoning permit.
2. Where the public sidewalk enters private property, a connection shall
be provided to the street. The private portion of the walkway shall be
maintained by the developer and adequate lighting shall be installed in the
wooded area.
3. Sufficient grading detail shall be provided, to the approval of the
City Engineer, to show the storm drainage pattern along the east side
of the buildings.
4. Depressed curbing shall be provided across the entire width of the drive-
way entrance.
5. A recreation fee of $1332 shall be paid.
6. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: David Spitz, City Planner
Re: Agenda Items for 11/13/79
Date: 11/9/79
#2 Blanchard Subdivision at 162 East Terrace
Proposed lot meets zoning requirements for the R4 zone - sufficient lot
size for a single family house or duplex, sufficient setbacks from the existing
house, and sufficient frontage for both lots. In order to meet these requirements
irregular lot lines have been created. The Zoning Board will consider the re-
quest for a duplex at their November 26 meeting.
#3 Windrid e A artments t 200 Kennedy Drive
The easement to the adjacent property for secondary or emergency access -has
been shown on the plat. Legal aspects of the easement should be reviewed.
Sidewalks: The Natural Resources Committee has recommended that no filling
into the C-0 district take place for purposes of building a sidewalk. Applicant
has proposed a peastone footpath with 2 footbridges across the streams to be
located outside of the street right-of-way. Because of the footbridges and the
steepne_as of the path at points the City will not be able to maintain the footpath.
However, the possibility of an easement for public access with no maintenance
reasponsibilities should be reviewed.
Watermain layout has been approved.
#4 StonehedQe. Phase 11
Engineering data on individual clusters is incomplete. Certain cluster re-
locations may take place if a planned land swap occurs in connection with a
recreational grant that the City is seeking. Details on finished building grades,
drainage, sewer elevations, walkways and other items will be presented prior
to construction of each individual cluster.
Roadway status remains to be determined. Applicant requests private,
City Manager wants public. Proposed streets are 20' paved width with swails
for drainage. Details for the road base are equivalent to public streets. If
public streets are required, building setbacks should be addressed.
Walkways should be provided throughout the development to the public street
in addition to the proposed linkage between buildings and parking lots.
Cluster "M" has been relocated to maintain existing trees.
Easements for public sewer and water mains should be provided.
Review by fire chief is incomplete.
#5 McDonalds at 1225 Williston Road
City attorney's opinion is that McDonalds' proposed lease of land from the
Citgo station will increase the degree of nonconformity of the Citgo lot in
violation of the City's zoning regulation. Therefore the City Attorney re-
commends denial of the application.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: ( Windridge Apartments, Kennedy Drive
Date: 11/9/79
I. The sidewalk on private property should be maintained by the developer
however, it should be opento the public. This may cause some legal problems.
X-2. Where sidewalk enters private property, a connection should be constructed
to the street curbing to facilitate snow removal.
3. Lighting should be considered in the wooded area of the sidewalk especially
where steps are planned.
/ 4. A culvert draining parking lot should be relocated to outlet into drainage-
way instead of adjacent to the sidewalk.
5. Curbing at driveway entrance shall be depressed and across entire width of
entrance.
/ 6. There is insufficient topo to determine how the storm runoff along the
V east side of buildings will be taken care of.
J7. Water Department to review water main layout.
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
WDIDRIDGE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
A. Data Base.
159 Pearl Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
(802) 879-6567
November 9, 1979
10
The September 1979 report by Traffic Engineering Associates for
the City of South Burlington contains,capacity analysis for the two
signallized intersections nearest the proposed apartment project.
At the evening peak hour, the report data shows that all approaches
to the intersections of Kennedy Drive with Williston Road and Hinesburg
Road are operating at a "C" level of service or better, with the
following exceptions:
The Hinesburg Road north approach to Kennedy
Drive, which was operating at 907. capacity,
or "D" level of service (when observed from
4:30-5:30 p.m., 1/9/79) and the west Kennedy
Drive approach to the same interpsection,
operating at 897. of capacity, or "D" level of
service (when observed at the same time and
date).
B. Field Observations.
The two more congested. approaches were observed over four separate
1/2 hour periods on November 2, 6, 7, and 8, all between 4:30 and 5:30
p.m., with the following results:
(1) Hinesburg Road North Approach
168 vehicles average of 4.1 vehicles
41 cycles per cycle (range: 0-8 vehicles
per cycle).
There were no fully loaded cycles, -no vehicles
waiting to pass through as the signal changed to
red.
Randolph, Vermont Essex Junction, Vermont Concord, New Hampshire
Windridge Traffic Analysis
November 9, 1979
Page 2
(2) Kennedy Drive Approach
Straight. 334 vehicles = average of 7.3 vehicles
& right 46 cycles per cycle (range: 2-14
vehicles per cycle).
Left Terns: 164 vehicles _ average of 3.6 vehicles
46—cycles per cycle.
On 28 of 46.cycles observed, there were no vehicles
waiting to pass through as the signal changed to red.
For the remaining 18 cycles, there were a total of 32
vehicles queued up, for an average of 1.8 vehicles
per cycle, with a range of 1-4 vehicles. The queued
vehicles were nearly all left turning vehicles, heading
north on Hinesbury Road.
C. Conclusion.
The existing volume and capacity data in the Traffic Engineering
Associates report depicts the physical and operating conditions of this
intersection at a particular time and date. Further sampling indicates
that lower levels.of congestion are the more likely prevailing condition.
The additional p.m. peak hour trips identified for this project in the
Landplan Inc. study use 3 for the Hinesburg Road approach and 6 for
the Kennedy Drive approach.
Our field observations of traffic flow indicate that this traffic
can be readily accommondated by this intersection without unreasonable
congestion.
November 9, 1979
Mr. Steve Page
Dubois & King. Inc.
159 Pearl Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Re: Windridge Apartments
Plans dated November 0', 1979
Dear Steve:
I have approved the above referenced plans with a few notes
which I feel will clarify the approval. Prior to constructior-
I require a preconstruction conference with you and the contractor
in attendance.
Sincerely,
Robert Gardner
Superintendent
RG/sy
cc: Ed Blake
William Szymanski
September 4, 1979
Mr. Ron O'Bryan
159 Pearl Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Re: Windridge Apartments Preliminary Plat
Dear Ron:
This is to formally confirm the action of the South Burlington
Planning Commission, at its meeting of 8/28/79, in approving the
preliminary plat application for Windridge Apartments. A copy of
the approval stipulations is enclosed. As you are aware, traffic
impact appears to be the primary issue still unresolved. I will
be setting up a field inspection .for the Commission of several
intersections.so that they can get a better feeling for the
congestion standards they have adopted. As a result of this, the
Commission may relax its standards, which would probably resolve
the issue. Alternatively, they may stick by the standards which
they have adopted; if this is the case, I suggest yourbbest bet is
to plan an upgrading the most congested intersection approach, which
is the Hinesburg Road north approach to Kennedy Drive. 1 will let
you know when this inspection is scheduled.
Don't hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Yours truly,
Stephen Page,
Planner
1 Encl
R��8/79
SUGGESTED MOTION OF APPROVAL - WINDRIDGE APARTMENTS
------------------------------------------------
I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve
the preliminary plat application of L.T.H. Associates, for a 17 unit
apartment project at 200 Kennedy Drive, as depicted on a plan en-
titled "Windridge Apartments - Site Plan; dated 5/13, 7/3, 8/1, 8/13,
and 8/27/79, prepared by Ronald O'Bryan, subject to the following
stipulations:
1. access between the entrance drive and the abutting property
to the east, for secondary or emergency access purposes when that
property is developed, shall be shown on the final plat and secured
by an appropriate legal mechanism.
2. the Commission retains jurisdiction on the issue of traffic
impact, which shall be decided upon at final plat.
3. the sidewalk shall be deleted.
4. details on storm drainage, outdoor lighting, and landscaping
shall be submitted with the final plat.
5. a recreation fee of $1332 shall be paid.
PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 28, 1979
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, August 28, 1979
at 7:30 Pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 1175. Williston Road
Members Present
Sidney Poger, Chairman; Ernest Levesque, George Mona, Peter Jacob, James Ewing,
Kirk Woolery (late)
Member Absent
James Draper
Others Present
Stephen Page, Planner; Gerald Kilot, Sylvia Smith, William Schuele, Day Neubert,
Peter Matta, Rudy Hirss, Charles Batchelder, Bob Maritano, John Stuart, Leo O'Brien,
Jr., Robert Roesler,.Ray Lawrence, Peter Judge, Paul Sprayregen, John Larkin,
Ronald O'Bryan
Minutes of August 14, 1979
The minutes'of'Aiigust 14, 1979 were approved on a motion by Mr. Mona, a
second by is. Jacob, and a unanimous vote.
Continue public hearing on preliminary plat a plication..of L.T.H. Associates for
a 17 unit apartment project at 200 Kennedy_Drive
Mr. Ron O'Bryan said that at the last meeting the Commission had suggested
that only 16 buildings be constructed so there would be no intrusion on the CO
zone and the developers agreed. They subsequently found a way to get the,,,l7eth
building in, however, so it is back on the plan. Two buildings were connected to
do this. The parking lot has been discussed with the Fire Chief and the large
building resulting from the 17th unit will be tied to the fire station with an alarm
system. There will be little disturbance of the CO zone, he said.
On the question of traffic, Mr. O'Bryan noted that the City Council had
reviewed this project under Interim Zoning for traffic impact and had approved it.
In response to questions, Mr. O'Bryan said the pole in the center of the
circle would be the only lighting except for concealed lighting at the entrances,
there would be exits on the rear of the units, there will be no garages, and 37
parking spaces are provided. 3 of these are not paved and are for boat and camper
storage. The units will be apartments.
Mr. Woolery arrived at this point.
Mr. Page raised the issue of the sidewalk. The developer is willing to put
one in, but there is a dip on the land and fill would have to be put in for the walk.
This fill would probably extend into the CO zone 40-50' at the toe of the slope,
and be 5-6' at the top. The culvert would be extended. I1r. Levesque asked how
the natural Resources Committee felt about that and I✓s. Schuele, Chairman of that
board, replied that they had not yet seen the proposal. The Commission seemed to
feel there should be a sidewalk. The amount of fill necessary can be lessened if
the sidewalk dips a little in that spot. The dip would be about 220' long.
Mr. Nona cautioned the developers that there was not much room between the
buildings and the edge of the property and he asked them to take extreme care to
avoid cutting more trees than necessary.
Yx. Mona asked about guest parking and was told they could park along the
2.
PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 28, 1979
30' road or in the office building parking lot across the street. Mr. Levesque
felt college students would use these apartments and they would bring a lot of
cars to the lot and make it crowded. It was noted that parking provided was more
than the ordinance required. Mr. Poger pointed out that Mr. Levesque had been
right last meeting when he said 17 units could be built on the site without going
into the CO zone if they were designed differently.
Mr. Page said that 3 approaches to the two nearest signallized intersections
to this project were at D level of service and the Commission wanted all approaches
to be C level. This project would add very little traffic, but the cumulative
effect of insignificant additions becomes significant. Mr. Page said the Commission
had hoped to meet with the Council on the question but the meeting had been
cancelled. He suggested the Commission retain jurisdiction on the traffic question
until they could have a meeting with Council and come to a decision on acceptable
traffic levels in the city. He also suggested that the Commission talk to its
traffic consultant and try to get a personal feel for what D level means. He said
that choosing an acceptable level of service was a value judgement the city had to make
Level D may not be as bad as it has been presumed to be.
I-Ir. Kilot felt' much of the city's traffic came from outside it but it was
pointed out that whatever was built in the city added to its traffic also. Mr.
Mona suggested a periodic update on how much traffic approved developments were
going to add to present flows, similar to the sewer update on flows, might be needed.
Mr. Jacob was ncrt,sure the Commission could discuss traffic since the Council
had already dealt with it under Interim Zoning and said he would like an opinion
from the City Attorney on that.
Mr. Mona felt one of the Commission's jobs was to provide council to the
Council and that they should make recommendations to them when they felt Council
was not going in the same direction the Commission was.
Mr. 1Noolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the
preliminary plat application of L.T.H. Associates, for a 17 unit apartment project
at 200 Kennedy Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "windridge Apartmentsr---tSite
Plan", dated 5 15 79 and last revised 8 27 79, prepared by Ronald O'Bryan, subject
to the following stipulations:
1. Access between the entrance drive and the abutting property to the east,
for secondary or emergency access purposes when that property is developed, shall
be shown on the final plat and secured by an appropriate legal mechanism.
2. The Commission retains jurisdiction.on the issue of traffic impact,
which shall be decided upon at final plat.
3. Details on storm drainage, outdoor lighting, and landscaping shall be
submitted with the final plat.
4. A recreation fee of t1332 shall be paid.
�Ir. Ewing seconded the motion.
Mr. Mona moved to amend the motion to Bay that"approval is subject to the
final decision on traffic impact." Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. Mr. Nona felt
that approval should be subject to a review of the traffic impact, but Mr.
Poger pointed out that if the Attorney said the Co=ission did not have the power
to do so, it did not have the power. The motion failed with Messrs. Ewing and
Levesque voting yes and B's. Mona abstaining.
The unamended motion passed unanimously.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Stephen Page, Planner
Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items
Date: 8/23/79
#2/"L.T.H. Preliminary Plat for 17 apartment units at 200 Kennedy Drive
One unit has been deleted from the plan to provide for a 50'
setback from the drainageway, as requested at the last meeting.
Details on landscaping, outdoor lighting, and utilities are forth -
coming - they may be reviewed now,cv_at the final plat hearing. The
one issue which remains unresolved is traffic impact; this project
received interim zoning approval from the Council, it will add traffic
to 3 nearby intersection approaches which are presently operating at
less than "C" level of service; while the additional traffic generated
is on the order of 1 to 12% of existing peak hour flows, the cumulative
effects of a number of such projects are significant. The only suggestiot
I can offer is to delay a decision on this aspect of the plan until a
joint meeting with Council has been held to discuss and resolve the
question of acceptable levels of traffic congestion.
#3 Twin Oaks Condominiums - Revised Final Plat
The layout for this proposal depends on the action of the Zoning
Board on Monday evening concerning the variance to the C-0 district.
Once the exact layout has been firmed up to the satisfaction of the
Commission, engineering and legal details should be finalized before
taking action.
#4 Treetops Phase II Revised Final Plat
The site has been restored to the satisfaction of the Zoning
Adminstrator and the building permits have been reinstated (see
attached memo). Turning to the revised final plat, buildings and
parking have been redistributed: there are 10 more parking spaces
than on the previous plan, and they are arranged in a way that is
more similar to that in Phase I; the number of dwelling units is
unchanged, but 8 units have been moved farther away and uphill from
the C-0 area. Bonding and legal documents are in order.
#5 Hallmatt Inc. 1 lot subdivision
The enclosed map shows this 3.29 acre property, which is presently
occupied by the Tower Restaurant and Vallenti printers. The sub-
division is planned so lots 1 and 2 are to be setoff for the Tower
and Vallenti mespectively, and the remaining 1.72 acres (not a building
lot) is to be added to a contiguous lot occupied by the theatre and
restaurant complex.
Because of the location of the existing structures, it is not
possible to separate the two businesses without making the structures
non -conforming in relation to the intervening property line. Lots
1 5 2 conform to all other dimensional requirements affected by this
plan. The status of sewer and water services to these lots should be
cleared up.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: South Burlington Planning Commission
FROM: William J. Szymanski
RE: Windridge Apartments, Kennedy Drive
DATE: August 24, 1979
1. Sidewalk construction along Kennedy Drive, at the westerly
end of the property, will require a considerable amount of
filling into the CO zone.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Szymanski
City Manager
1
I J
I _ �
j PUBLIC HEARING 3 a
SOUTH BURL, INGTON PLANNING: COMMI S S ION
t
The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175
Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont. on Tuesday, August 14,
1979. at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following:
Preliminary plat application of L.T.H. Associates to construct
a 17 unit apartment complex on a 2.5 acre parcel directly so„t1L---
east of 200 Kennedy Drive. The proposed subdivision is bo_unde _
by Kennedy Drive on the northwest, and on the east and south b_X_
lands of Forest Park Realty Corporation.
Copies of the application are available
for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall:
Sidney B. Poger
Chairman
South Burlington
Planning Commission
July 28, 1979
PL_'►NNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 14, 1979
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, August 14,
1979 at 7:30 pm in ti.e Conference Room, City Hall, 1175 Williston Road
Members Present
Sidney Poger, Chairman; Ernest Levesque, i:irk Aroolery (late), James mowing, George
Mora
Members Absent
Peter Jacob, James Dra"er
Others :'resent
Stephen Page, 'Planner; James Mick, P.obert and :Marie Dussich, John Larkin,
Ronald O'Bryan, Kay Neubert, Robert Walsh, Sandy and Dale Kleppineer, Doris Bailey,
Paul Sprayregen, Gary Farrell, Alan Falmer
:Minutes of August 7. 1979
Yr. Mona moved to approve the Au.ast 7, 1979 minutes. t's. Ewing seconded
the motion and all voted aye.
aublic hearing on preliminary slat applic-tien of L T H Associates to construct
17 asartments on a 2.5_acre parcel at 201 Eennedv Driv.
Mr. Ron O'Bryan showed the Commission what was to be filled in the area and
said the fill would not disturb the drainage swale in that area. The developers
have spent some time trying to move building 2 away from the swale and think that
with this plan the impact will be minimal. Under nor=al city zoning, part of
the building would be in the CO zone, but this area is under Interim Zoning, so
legally that is no longer the case. Mr. Page felt that the plan would preserve
the spirit of the CO zone and maintain the character of the drainageway. Mr. Poger
did not agree, saying that the CO zone had been created to preserve drainageways
and should be considered even if legally the zone was not in place.
Mr. Woolery arrived at this time.
high. Mr. Poger suggested that the number of units proposed for the site was too
:Mr. rage said that if this plan were ap;roved, the area would continue to
drain the way it does now. The fill wc-uld be to maintain elevationz and esthetics
on the site.
Mr. Levesque felt that a good designer could fit the buildings to the site.
Ee felt the city should not deviate from the ret-ulations so developers could
maximize their profits.
Mr. Woolery noted that if the number of units was reduced to 16, everything
would fit on the site without co=promisine the Cj zone. Yr. Ewing felt that zone
should be left undisturbed. Mr. Mona did not think Interim Zoning charged the
intent of the CO 2D ne.
Traffic was discussed, with 'Mr. rage telling the Co=ission that their criterin
on traffic stated that development was nct to be a -proved unless intersection
aptroaches nearby were at C level or better. He said at the pm pear hour,
this project would add 6 cars to the Kennedy Drive west approach to the intersecti,_c
with Hinesburg Road, which is now at level D (410 cars). It would also add 3 cars
during the pm peak to the north Hinesburg Road approach, which now has 25b cars.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski
Re: Next Week's Agenda Items
Date: 8/10/79
Dr. French Subdivision
Hinesburg Road has a high volume of heavy truck traffic. It
has a posted speed limit of 55 M.P.H. Improvements to the road are
being made in the area of this proposed subdivision and another is
expected to commence very soon in the vicinity of the intersection
of Cheesefactory Road, these improvements will encourage high speed
travel in this vicinity. Road openings on to Hinesburg Road should
be discouraged. It would be my preference to see a road constructed
from Van Sicklen Road to serve this subdivision.
Re: Broadcast Park
Two lot subdivision, Joy Drive - No comments
Kennedv Lane Apartments. Kennedv Drive
1. Considerable fill will be required alongthe west side of
building #2. This filling will extend over the drainage way.
2. It appears a minor drainage way will be obstructed by
the north end of building #1.
3. The water main on Kennedy Drive must be extended along the
entire frontage of this development. Plans must also be reviewed
by City Water Department.
4. The angle of approach may make it difficult to maneuver
into the parking space adjacent to building #1, this should be
checked.
py�
�� rzpo . wdlr
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Stephen Page, Planner
Re: Next Week's Agenda Items
Date: August 8, 1979
#2Kenned_Lane _Apartments
17 apartments are proposed on a wooded 2.5 acre triangular lot,
at 200 Kennedy Drive. This project received conditional use approval
from Council last spring. The access point is aligned with the curb
cut across the street, and should be made available (via an easement)
for a secondary access to serve the abutting property of Forest Park
Realty. Sight distances are excellent. Bruce Houghton's traffic data
shows that 5 of the approaches to the two nearest signalized inter-
sections are operating at "C" level of service or better at the P.M.
peak hour; The three remaining approaches, which would be used by
homeward bound project residents are operating at lower levels of service.
Parking (36 spaces) and circulation are ample -a modest area should
be set aside for storage of adult's toys (boats, campers, etc.). At
the same time, I would like to see as many of the mature trees saved as
possible.
Sewage capacity and adequate water are available; I believe the
-CO VO - Fire Chief has approved the plan. Storm drainage plans have not vet
been submitted; also, outdoor lighting and landscaping sho..,f
Adequate school capacity has bee�irmed by the School Board.
I suggest the Commission decide on the following additional items:
CK(1) A sidewalk should be constructed across the frontage, or
adequate funds placed in an escrow account.
OKq QG. (2) There is no land suited for recreation purposes on site; the
recreaction fee calculates out at $2539; because of the inequities of
our evaluation system, I suggest a waiver of this fee to approximately
$100/unit. -N I -Mltp t ZI W.
OK (3) The project's name should be changed so as not to duplicate
or resemble other street or project names.
44) Erosion control and protection of the drainageway on the
west side of the lot should be insisted upon; the closest building corner
has been staked out in the field.
(See location map on following page)
SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
FREDERICK H. TUTTLE
Superintendent
LA`NRENCE E. LECOURS
Assistant Superintendent
Mr. Gerald C. Milot
Milot Real Estate
159 Pearl Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Dear Gerry,
O
OFFICE: SOUTH BURLINGTON HIGH
550 Dorset Street
July 26, 1979
At their regular meeting on July 25, 1979, the South Burlington School Di-
rectors voted that your project, as outlined in your letter dated March 13, 1979
would not place an unreasonable burden on this municipality to provide educational
services.
Because of the concern for the safety of our students, it is requested that
sidewalks be provided in conjunction with the roads to be constructed. This will
allow students to walk safely to and from bus stops. I am enclosing a copy of
our transportation policy for your information. Please note item #4 under the ad-
ministrative guidelines - "Buses will not be routed over private roads."
The following school information may be of assistance as you or your associ-
ates meet with prospective clients:
Grades K-5 Chamberlin School
White Street
South Burlington
Grades 6-8 Middle School
500 Dorset Street
South Burlington
Grades 9-12 High School
550 Dorset Street
South Burlington
If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
FHT:cl
enc .
-_c: Mr. Stoph en Pape
Mr. Lawrence LeCours
Mr. John Lucas
All Building Principals
Sincgely yours, .01
Frederick H. Tuttle
Superintendent of Schools
To:
Windridge Homeowners Association
175 KENNEDY DRIVE # 18
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
April 30, 1982
Planning Commissions
This is to inform the members of the planning commissions
that on April 21, 1982 the Windridge Homeowners Association
approved the proposal to build decks on the rear of the units.
Project Coordinator, Gerald Johnson, of unit 1, will submit
the plan for approval.
One design was approved at the meeting for all units. This
was decided to maintain aesthetics and uniformity with respect
to the existing building and landscaping.
Each owner will be responsible for the construction of their
deck to the approved design.
Sincerely,
Charles A. Carpenter Jr.
Secretary
Windridge Homeowners Association
-K •, S 1-kr- 4110':c D Wn ers Gt�'e i� � vr�, a f frova l .
Ge(-A) Jok L),;+ I
atw-1e5 C'4cp► - Ater Uvili+ 2
VInce FoI,ey L)A;+ 13
NOTICE OF APPEAL
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
1
Name, address and telephone # of applicant (� ecG�C� �. _TA,rsa r1 I
i "1 5 K e vacs-� y Or: L A n i � ii I `Jon i �LA r— c�'Ec� r� �(e � r�� or�t OS�+o1 Lo 58 -: 14,� 3
Name, address of property owner
Property location and description PX-VkO AeGk'__' oyv\x*kon-w-
I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: c;.i.i,Lonal s� ,
variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are
held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertises„ent must appe:..r
a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee
of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing.
Hearing Date Signature ofelC,6pellaw
6- /"_ �---------------Do_not write below this line
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE
In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title
24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a pub''c hearing
at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Str,,C�t, Sout,
Burlington, Vermont on , , at _
(day of week) month and date) tim-;
to consider the following:
l 3f Appeal of Z4 ICr.,0 01^
P
1 ,
seeking a �.,�,�, �,�,..,�,. , from Section
••�pR+- of the South
Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to �t-M.a1.{� cam' zL /Q/�
`�[.�,.,� � W �-�.w ,�,,✓.a.0 � (',�DJ ,j��'� O'7 T.�- /1t�'ulilo � ./1>Q-c_..
SOUTH BURLINGTON.
CE
In accordant ZONING I
with t eSouth
IinOton Zoning8ur-
Re
Chooter 117, 9ulatiorts and
South Burlington lZonin V.S. A. the
Adiustment N,pl D BOgrd d(
heart hold o public
at the South BVrlinpfon
Municipal Offices, Conference
Room, S75 Dorset Street, South
Burling}On, Vermont On MondO
May 24, 1982, at 5.00 PMto co
. n"
cider the tolls:owin . -
1. AODeo1 of G erold'piyinconxo
seeking a variance, h0m Section
he S Dimensional requirement of
Re South Burl inpion Rlpulotions.
locate
Is for aermission to re -
twenty fl 15'x27' porope fo within
iwMty-five (25) feet e required
rMF yard ql 9 WoodcresI Drive.
pp LiuADPeal
of Yirp and Josephine
! u s11 seek
Dimensional
from Sec -
lion require.
menand Section 11.25 O}
South Burlirpton R the
quest Is for lOulotions. Re -
or to con"
a multi Tomily to wlinin dwelling unit
one hundred Ond forty
(140) feet of Interstate 89 and a
second dwelling unit t0 within
front Yard, (69) feet of the required
yard• at 701 Dorset Strlei-
3' Appeal of Windridge Home-
owners ASsOciafiOn,.Gerald John-
' afent ring a variance,
from Section 11.00, Dimensional
requirements of the South Burhng
tan Regulations. Request is for
deck to wn to construct o 10'x15'
deck to within twenty (2D) feet of
the required rear Yard, o1 units 1,
2• Prod 3. Wmarlage. I7S Kennedy
Drive,
4. Anneal of Harper s. trot Hotels.fe).
L.M. Field. ownt sPekinp vIn, once. from Sect'On 13.0p, Non, Or
1 lOr an, uIe3 & structures, en
r Section Ii OD dimensiorgl
ton Rem lots of tiro! South Burlirp.
e9vlofions. Request is for
DPrmI3:.n, 10 c011struct on Oddi Pion GonlaininD aoproximotely
3•>� sovare felt, odtlition to be
wiMin h si(IS) feet Of easterlyly cot
de yard. existing Structure is 10.
12.5)10 within
eM oft Iwo Prod one half
eaSleriv side Yar Pfaposed addition is an increased.
to the IOu,, and general ci o
'ion area at to HolidoY Inn, ig68
Williston Road
S. Appeal OI Ciemeni COVlllard
KiroO 0 vgrlance, from Section
11.�. DImM3iarnp1 re011lrlmMlS
Of the South Burlington Repu-
Ivtnons. Request is for permission
t0 relocate a single tamely dwell-
witog, 26'x� with CM family
garage to
elf -
within forty xvM (47) legit of the
reouirltl frOnI vard, ono IOno-Street. cotetl t0 thergrM Of S% Soear
Sir
ZoningRichard Word,
May 8, 1982 Ad Officer
J
May 11, 1982
Mr. Gerald Johnson
175 Kennedy Drive
Windridoe
:youth Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Zoning hearing
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a
public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on
Monday, May 24,1982 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning
variance.
Please plan to attend this meeting.
Rk/mcg
Very truly,
Richard ward,
Zoning Administrative Officer
,-tee.' a ,
r _� -- `� �_ �_Z. �-�'y► .nor,_
_ , ------ --- --
April 25, 1983
I"x . William Perrault
17 - 175 Kennedy Drive
South Burlington, Vermont. 054.U1
ae. zoning hearing
Dear Mr. Perrault:
Be advised that the S(wtth Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a
public hearing at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on I'lon-
day, May 9, 1983 at 5.00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance.
please plan to attend this hearing.
Very truly,
Richard Ward,
zoning t-,dministrative Officer
RW/mca
NOTICE OF APPEAL
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING
BOARD
OF ADJUSTMENT
�.�`Name,
address and telephone # of applicant
"�
6u
m-c4 - n A rre4c
/
Name, address of property owner -)6147 G. C,I <_1 0 h()Ve
Property location and description Ceyndo lOfplec ! CJYI �C-""Jy Vf. 06 j ) S
� 6 t1►.N«
I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use,
variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are
held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear
a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee
of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing.
Hearing Date Signature of Appellant
" Do not write below this line
---�-.',rim--------------------�-----------------------------------------------------------
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE
In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title
24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing
at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South
Burlington, Vermont on , , at
day of week month and date time
to consider the following:
Appeal of
seeking a from Section
-, , X.,,,A,. — .r
of the South
Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to
_M."` 47,, 1715 x-, -117
''�,
r
NOTICE OF APPEAL /
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT `
Name, address and telephone # of applicant A. u tD R O I
6�5-) S 4 ELBU f n c Z. 'Y 8-2-2? t ?'
Opv� +Cy C rn 1 ass-, qC
Name, address of property owner 1'_9")k C-CL) ✓ln "" Cxn-t05t' OUE so-eyr4#14"
Property location. and description
I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use,
variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are
held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear
a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee
of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing.
Hearing Date Signature of Appellant
Do_not write below this line
--------------------------------------------------------
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE
In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title
24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing
at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South
Burlington, Vermont on , , at
(day of week)
to consider the following:
i 1
Appeal of
seeking a
month and date
from Section ,
Lime
of the South
Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to --� �',2 �Gx ' �►� /
August 9, 1982
Mr. David Lamonda
Box 149A
Shelburne, Vermont 05482
Dear Mr. Lamonda:
Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a
public hearing at the City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday,
August 23, 1982 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance.
Please plan to attend this meeting.
Very truly,
Richard Ward,
Zoning Administrative Officer
RW/mcg
LEGAL NOTICES
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING
NOTICE
In accordance with the South Bur-
lington Zoning Regulations and
Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the
South Burlington Zoning Board of
Adjustment will hold a public
hearing at the South Burlington
Municipal Offices, Conference
Room, 575 Dorset Street, South
Burlington, Vermont on Monday,
August 23, 1982, at 5:00 P.M. to
consider the following:
1. Appeal of Frank Coto seeking a
variance, from Section 11.15, Mul-
tiple uses and Section 13.00, Non-
conforming uses & structures bf
the South Burlington Regulations.
Request Is for permission to"con-
struct a 30' x 60' .building, to be
occupied by manufacturing type
use in conjunction with two exist-
ing uses. Also requiring a variance
from Section 11.001 existing and
proposed setback being sixty-sev-
en (67) feet, at Twin State Neon
Sign, 397 Patchen Road.'
2. Appeal of Joseph B. Dalton,
seeking a variance, form Section
13.00. Non -conforming uses &
structures, from Section 13.00,
iNon-conformina uses & structurt
es of the, South Burlington Regu-
lations. Request Is for permission
to construct a 12' x 24' addition to
within eleven, (11) feet of the
southerly side yard, at 61 Sub-
urban Square.
3. Appeal of David Lomonda &
Ralph Cousino seeking a variance,
from Section 11.00, Dimensional
requirements of the South Burling-
ton Regulations. Request Is for
permission to construct a 10'x15'
deck to within twenty-four (24)
feet of the required rear yard, at
unit no. 14, 175 Kennedy Drive.
4. Appeal of Charles and Janet
Perkins seeking a variance, from
Section 7.00, - Permitted uses and
Section 11.15 Multiple uses of the
South Burlington Regulations. Re-
quest Is for permission to convert
an existing dwelling (boardlna
house) Into a restaurant -motel
(restaurant seating captKity, of 105
and five unit motel) continue
motel use of four existing units,
occupy restaurant area as d cater -
Ina service, of the former Lin-
denwood Motel, 916 Shelburne
Road,
5. Appeal of Howard and Jeanette
Hayden, Raymond Ploof, agent
seeking a variance, from Section
11.00, Dimensional Requirements
of the South Burlington Regu-
lations. Request Is for permission
to construct a 24'x36' slnale family
dwelling to within seven (7) feet of
the northerly side yard on lot no.
43, adjacent to 33 Orchard Road.
Richard Ward
Zoning Administrative Officer
August 7. 1992
No Text
Stipulations:
1. The proposed use shall be strictly a take-out operation, there
will be no eating on the premises at anytime.
2. Houma of operation shall be from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. - any change
in the hours of opgation shall be reviewed by the City Council.
;-' -- L
Y � P
LA
CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS
P. O. BOX 82 WARREN, VT. 05674 TEL. (802) 496-3758
March 5, 1979
Mr. Jerry Milot Mr. Stephen Page
Milot Real Estate South Burlington Planning Commission
Essex Junction, Vt. South Burlington, Vt.
Gentlemen:
We are pleased to submit the traffic impact study for the Larkin -
Tarrant Develon-nent and the Colony Park Office Center.
The conclusions enclosed are self exnlantory. Briefly, they
are that:
a. The Larkin Tarrant development will have a
minor impact on local streets. The approach to
Kennedy Drive from Rte. 116 (north) at peak
hour is already over saturated, and will even-
tually need upgrading.
b. The Colony Park Office Center will create a
significant amount of traffic, but this traf-
fic will not create unstable conditions at
the intersection approaches affected.
I N
LA'� NDPLAN, HNrk,,o.
CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS
P. O. BOX 82 WARREN, VT. 05674 TEL. (802) 496-3758
Page 1
ANALYSIS OF THE LMPACT OF THE COLONY PARK OFFICE
CENTER AND LARKIN-TARRk%7 DEVELOPMENT OF INTERSECTION TRAFFIC
CAPACITY
A. SCOPE OF THE STUDY
This study has been prepared for Milot Real Estate and the City
of South Burlington in order to determine the effect of the Colony
Park office upon traffic movement along Kennedy Drive, specifically
at the Kennedy Drive - Rte. 2 and Kennedy Drive Rte. 116 inter-
sections. Eventual recommendations for changes in intersection
control will be relative to the specific intersection only, and will
not consider the effect of those changes in the general traffic pat-
tern of the area. The study relies on data supplied by the Vermont
Department of Highways, Traffic Research Division, the Chittenden
County Regional Planning Commission, as well as information supplied
by your office. The conclusions are in regard to the effect of these
projects only.
B. ANALYSIS OF PRESENT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
1. Description of Intersections.
The various physical factors influencing the flan of traffic
through the intersections are presented in Table I belay. Both
the Kennedy Drive - Rte. 2 and Kennedy Drive - Rte. 116 intersections
are controlled by fixed cycle three phase traffic signals. All four
approaches to the Kennedy Drive - Rte. 2 intersection have right
turn lanes. The capacities for both intersections were obtained
from the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Urban
Transportation Study 1976. The right turn on red law became effec-
tive in South Burlington on July 1, 1977, and would increase the
previously used capacity standards for these intersections. How-
ever, these increases are not clearly quantifiable and are not
considered in this study.
2. 1979 Traffic Volumes
Traffic counts for both intersections were obtained from the
Vermont Department of Highways. (See Appendix A) These were one
day, six hour turning movements surveys conducted on August 23, 1977.
For Rte. 116 and Kennedy drive, these are recomputed to 1979 Average
Daily Traffic (ADT) and Peak Hour (PHV) volumes according to Depart-
ment of Highway formulas and are presented in Table III.
Page 2
For Rte. 2 and Kennedy Drive, we have followed the Vermont
Department of Highways assumption that the peak hour volumes
(4-5P.M.) shown in the Turning Movement Data sheet reflect the
30th or "design hour" vloumes, and in fact may actually reflect
the actual annual peak hour. The have been updated to 1979
according to the Department of Highways 2% per annum growth
rate.
C. PROJECTED TRAFFIC INCREASES FROM THE LARKIN-TARRANT DEVELOPMENT
In
The Larkin -Tarrant Development is a 17 unit apartment complex
located on Kennedy Drive east of Rte. 116. Traffic generated by this
project has been forecast according to the standard of one (1) vehicle
trip per dwelling unit at peak hour. Of these, 0.75 were vechiles
returning to the development, and 0.25 were exiting. Only the former
were considered in this study.
Assumptions as to the origin of these return trips were based on
the location of existing major employment centers and crcial deve-
lopment in the Greater Burlington area.
Briefly, distribution between the intersections has been based on
the following assumptions:
Kennedy Drive West approach to Rte. 116 35%
Rte. 116 North approach to Kennedy Drive 25%
Rte. 2 west approach to Kennedy Drive 10%
Rte. 2 east approach to Kennedy Drive 20%
Digital Complex 10%
PROJECTED TRAFFIC INCREASES FROM THE COLONY PARK OFFICE CIIV'IIJR
Colony Park is a 40,000 sq. ft. general office complex. using
standards derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers
research, the number of cars leaving the complex between 4 and 5 P.M.
is estimated at 48 cars (standard = 2.4 cars per 1,000 sq. ft. office
space during the 4 - 6 P.M. peak period).
Assumptions as to the destination of these vehicles is based on the
general intensity and pattern of development in the greater Burlington
area. This pattern suggests that 60% of the vehicles leaving the complex
will turn towards Rte. 2, and the balance will head towards the inter-
section of Kennedy Drive and Rte. 116. These assumptions were corroborated
by a recent survey of the destination of cars leaving the Digital Conmlex*.
The distribution of the additional vehicle trips generated by both
projects is shown in Tables II and III.
* Conducted by Bruce Houghton for the South Burlington Planning Commission.
TABLE I INTERSECTION DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS
INTERSECTION
STREET
TRAVEL
LANE
WIDTH
R.T.
LANE
L.T.
LANE
SIGNAL
CONTROL
GREEN
TIME
(%)
LEFT
TUFT
SIGNAL
RIGHT
TURN
ON
RED
ON
STREET
PARKING
PEDESTRIAN
CROSSINGS
DESIGN*
ADEQUACY
REMARKS
KENNEDY DRIV,'
TWO
No
Yes
F.C.37�
33%
No
Yes
No
Insignif.
Good.
Lane
AIRPORT DRIVE
"
"
"
"
33%
„
„
"
Good
RTE. 2
"
"
"
"
54%
„
"
"
"
Good
East approach has
E. & W.
grade in excess of 6�
Kv=DY DRIVE
Yes
47%
Good
E. & W.
RTI;'. 116
No
31%
Fair
N. & S.
to good
* CONSIDERS: ALIG\Z=; GRADIENT; VISIBILITY; NO. OF CURB CUTS NEAR INTERSECTION
� FIND CYCLE, THREE PRASE, NO SIGNAL DELAY
DISTRIBUTION OF ADDITIONAL TRAF,IC
AMONG INTERSECTION APPROACHES
TABLE II
NO. OF
NO. OF
DEVELOPbJENT
Dr,7ELLING
RETURNING-RTE.2
WILLISTON ROAD
KENNEDY DRIVE RTE. 116
UNITS OR
OR LEAVING—
—
—
OFFICE
CARS
RTE.2
RTE, 2
KENNEDY
AIRPORT DR.
KENNEDY DR.
KENNEDY DR.
RTE. 116
RTE. 116
SPACE
(P.H.)
EAST
WEST
DRIVE
NORTH
WEST
EAST
SOUTHEAST
North
LARKIN -
TARRANCE
17 d.u.
13*
1
1
--
--
6
-
-
3
DEVELOPME1lT
,OLONY PARK
40,000
48
-
-
1-9
-
-
29
-
OFFICE CENTER
Eq. ft.
* The vehicles returning fr(xn the Digital Complex do not appear in the intersection analysis.
TABLE III (continued)
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
KENNEDY DRIVE AND RTE. 116
TOTAL
APPROACH VECHICLE 1977 ADDITIONAL VOLUME (PH) PEAK CAPACITY
MOVEMENT HnUR G/C VPH 1' VPC
OFTICE RES, VOLUME
USE USE
TABLE
KENNEDY DRIVE AND W. 116
1;(r. 116 St.
207
3 516 31%
348
1.48
(Northwest Lt.
40
Rt.
266
KENNEDY DR. St.
453 29
- 567 470
958
0.61
(Northeast) Lt.
45
Rt.
40
Rt. 116 St.
60 -
- 166 31%
413
0.39
(Southeast) Lt.
33
Rt.
73
KENNEDY DR. St.
432 -
6 768 470
1215
0.63
(West) Lt.
153
Rt.
147
V/C = Volume/Capacity;
G/C = Percentage Green Seconds per signal cycle; VPC = Vehicle per hour
PHV = Peak Hour Volume
1. Source: Chittenden
County Regional Planning Conni.ssion,
Urban Transportation Study, 1976.
TABLE TII (continued)
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
I=-DY DRIVE AND RTE. 116
TOTAL
APPROACH
1977
ADDITIONAL VOLUME (PH)
PEAK
1.
MVECHICLE OV r
mnuR
GCAPACITY
VPC
VOLUME
OTTICE RES'
USE USE
TABLE
KENNEDY
DRIVE AND RT. 116
RT. 116
St.
207
3
516
310 348 1.48
(Northwest
Lt.
40
Rt.
266
KENNEDY DR.
St.
453
29 -
567
47% 958 0.61
(Northeast)
Lt.
45
Rt,
40
Rt. 116
St.
60 - - 166 31% 4.13 0.39
(Southeast)
Lt.
33
Rt.
1 73
KENNEDY DR.
St.
432 - 6 768 470 1215 0.63
(West)
Lt.
153
Rt.
147
V/C = Volimle/Capacity; G/C = Percentage Green Seconds per signal cycle; VPC = Vehicle per hour
PHV = Peak Hour Volume
1. Source: Crittenden County Regional Planning Ccmnission, Urban Transportation Study, 1976.
FA
Page 3
E. CONCLUSIONS AND RECWENDATIONS
The volume per capacity ratios (Table III) indicate that neither
of the projects will create an unstable level of flow (V/C = 1.0) at
any of the intersection approaches analyzed. Haaever, an unstable
level of peak hour service already exists along Rte. 116 Nortlmgest
approach to Kennedy Drive. However, traffic generated by the Larkin -
Tarrant Development will not significantly contribute to this problem.
At the Rte. 2 and Kennedy Drive intersection, an unstable level
of flow is imminent on the Williston Road (Southeast) approach (V/C
= 0.94). However, the projects do not contribute to this problem
either. The low V/C ratios for the other approaches suggest that
this problem could be forestalled by changing the green cycles.
APPENDIX A
REFERENCES TO TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA
CHITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
URBAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY
I INTERSECTION CAPACIYY ANALYSIS
i
TOYYN
SOUTH BL'RLINGTON
INTEPSE C i ON: WILLISTON ROAD (U.S. ROUTE 2), AIRPORT DRIVE & KENNEDY DRNE
DATE. JULY 1976
i APPROACH VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITION BALANCED CONDIT0N
RMOVEMENT G/C V/C CcPcity (VPH) G/C V/C Capacity (VPH)
,northwest) ° 240, 648
Ea;;port +` five St =Rt - Lt 33°/ 22% 715 30%
t
,897 66° 949
�,,,;tlistc,n St - Rt - Lt 5470
�Kenneey
;5oth) 6508
Drive St - Rt - Lt 330 /°
`We50 1134 57% 42° 1201
�williston ;load St - Rt - I,t 54% 45%
I
i
PREVAILING CONDITIONS: June 24, 1975; Tuesday; P.M. Peak Hour
G/C - green (G)/ seconds in cycle (C)
V/Ca VC113me? (V)/capacity (C)
VpH ,hi e3 p3r hour -49-
�a
VERMONT HIGHWAY PLANNING DIVISION PLACE:
TRAFFIC RESEARCH SECT.
C
DIR
PC
T
TOT
DIR
PC
T
TOT
DIR
PC I T
TO
( HR
7 •
-
7
Zz
/
23
33
/
17 -
4
/
S
A3
Z
AT
Z3
/
Z4
/O
/
/
20
/7
/7
I
TOT Is-QI Z I S Z ' TOT
PC TT TOT DIR
,3 3 NORTH
7 - 7
— 9
s8
I TOT
I
3 y�
-m 2z79
GCS Z
PC
T
TOT
DIR
/8a
7
._ /,5
/ssl
/%,
/7/
/G,3
7
/76
/9/
Z07 •
. 8 '
2-IC
TOT
PC
T
TOT
DIR M
0
-
3
i
.�z
/ •
33
2 4' I
-
Z
Z7 I
-
Z7
31,•�z
34
L4- I
-
z4 I
Z4o1
Q
0
c
O w
w a
c 9k
/s-G '
TOT
j /3 ter-
Ilia
I
/�9�
DIR
PC
T j
TOT
HR
44
Z
4G
/?
,7
/al
/ate •
Z
/oa
.�
74
3 '
77
TOT
3 3z. -
/G
1 34s -
V
DIR
PC
T
I TOT_ I
HR
Zz4
/3
Z37
iZ
Z40 _
z.c.
2��,
43
zzG
2-4 -
z5(o
/-4
3 7Z
is
�7s z ¢ `•
4 9 /G
'os C/ 4o�? • 11e, ' 4ZS {/7
Sz 10 TOT
DIR I PC I T I TOT IHR
PC: All passenger cars and 2-axle,4-tire trucks,11
/ 7�,
/fad TOT
T rJledium and heavy trucks and busses__
TOT i G B/
{ Iz3
DIR
PC
T
TOT
DIR
PC I T
TOT
DIR
PC
FT
TOT JHR
I
zc�
1
27
4s —
45"
78
ro
'E�P
►�
\3
21
_9,t -
.44
6 7-
/3 � :\
Z
�24-
9,)
Z
92.
I,z '
,,
tqo 1/4 ;
f
1 �� i7 0 }
I G
1
�9
7'
v
7s"
�► Z
14
q
C Q
2 u
TOT
TOT
3,30
33
TOT
CHI T TENDED COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COtYlIMISSION
URBAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY
` INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
TO N: SOUTH BURLINGTON
1,N',`ERGEC 1 [ON: KENNEDY DRIVE & HINESBURG RQ�D (VT, ROUTE 116)
DATE: DULY 1976
APPROACH
VEHICLE
EXISTING M14DI T ION
BALANCED CO DMO-N
MOVE'NA4ENT
G/C V/C Ccpcci?y (VPH)
G/C V/C MPH),
U."nriwest
^esburg Road
St - Rt - Lt
3151
65%
348
36%
57i'
305
',c--neast)
z-edy Drive
St - Rt - Lt
477c
23%
958
43%
257
E69
�,ouneast
"Lnesbarg Road
St - Rt - Lt
31%
35%
413
36510
31%
467
-
nedy Drive
St - Lt
47%
52%
540
43%
57°i
489
Rt
471i0
6%
675
43%
6%
E20
fi
:y1
1
I
-_-" r
i PR.:V IL.MG CONMI T IONS: November 27, 1974; Wednesday; P.Nli. Pe-7-<
i"1;1-1 g3—,n (C-,)/ se-onds:; in cvcI'a (C)
vek7,,."it`a' M/co.paCity (C)
p':r hour
-51-
Appendix zBk VERMONT HIGHWAY PLANNING DIVISION PLACE:.-w�/..>o���
page 2 TRAFFIC RESEARCH SECT. - /
y
1� DIR
PC
T
TOT
DIR
PC
T
T T
DIR
PC 'I-T
TOT
{ HR
�.? 7
?_
/3 9
38
G
18
2 (
20
1 /2
_44
/OC
Z
/06
49
4-
v3
/Z;9
69
/Z6
4
/3a
99
Z
I o 1
19
3
-
8v
94
-
c14
zZ
1
23
/7
i1
04 1
Z3
727
PC T I TOT
DIR
NORTH
73
e
86
/0 3
I /
7z
,3
yS
/SS
I \3
S-96
PC
1,33
T
G3/
TOT
TOT
DIRJ
/-0,7'
j 20
/69
A32
/o
/-iti3
/4S
16
/<3
Z/z
7
min
947 j 7Z
/a/ 9
TOT
I PC ; T
TOT
DIR
Z 3
i —
1 23
70 { Z
1Z
.s-/
3797
1 3c?,�, { 14 1 4to
N
-n /679 ^
9u
N vsny CO
z9-?
�? inn 7
89
3 9 Z {
P T TOT HR
DIR
20
IA—f
1I
t23
i3
IG
I 1
11
/S
Id
—
14 I
fS
17
TOT
91
4
95 1
DIR
[-PC--FT
TOT I
Hat
1 s�
9
te's- 1
/z
131
I�
147 1/3
Iz9
13
14Z 114
1 y4
14
113
I —
Z03
Iv
21fa
/G
19Z
19 1
211
117
Z4S TOT I 97Z 1 84 { 10S9 (/
DIR
{ PC
j T j
TOT
;H?
/3
/ 7
4J
2/
I /G
/Iff
/
/s
1.17
2C�?, j TOT
PC: All passenger cars and 2-axle,4.-tire trucks.!'
T : Medium and heavy trucks and busses. Al
707 GO
I !
3i
!
9t {
DIR
PC
T
TOT
D1R
PC ! T I TOT
DIR
QC { 7
I TOT iHi?
i
}
33
>
a c
r t
7 i
25
/
2G
4z
.4S
S
/�
/7
{ /3
8
/
9
_3
3 7
—
—
—
zi
-
zi
z
//
/.3
IIS
3 S
z8
/
29
9
7
/G
1 /.-
—
Z
'L
j TOLL
4
93
TOT I
/80
8
/88
TOT
4/
SS'
96
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington City Council
From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer
Re: Conditional use application Richard Tarrant & John Larkin,
Kennedy Drive
Date: October 24, 1978
Proposed is the construction of seventeen (17) residential units
on a parcel of land containing 2.4 acres, located easterly of
Georgetown Apartments. Under 1974 zoning regulations this area
is zoned Residential 7 District.
The applicant was recently denied a request to construct an (ffice
building on the site. Plan conforms to area, density and dimensional
requirements. No information on availability on municipal sewer
and water or whether the project will have on -site facilities.
/�fij�oS�,Q SITE
-e--- con/T,9 E 6V7 6- --J
October 23, 1978
Mr. John Larkin
Larkin Terrace Motel
1185 Shelburne Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Larkin:
Be advised that the South Burlington City Council will hold a
public hearing at the City Hall Conference Room, 1175 Williston
Road on Monday, November 6, 1978 at 7:30 p.m. to consider your
request for a zoning permit.
:Please plan to attend this meeting.
Very truly,
Richard Ward
"ening Administrative Officer
Rtr/mcg
r
A
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE
SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL
I hereby apply to the City Council for conditional use approval under
the Interim Zoning Regulation.
Property Owner l h c/eI2 t
Property location & description
Section 5 Conditional Uses
I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday
at 8:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertisement
must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days
before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off-
set the costs of advertising and the hearing. .
Hearing Date
SJ495MEure of Appellent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE
In accordance with the South Burlington Interim Zoning Regulations and
Section 4447, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlingtn City Council will
hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference
Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on
to consider
(day of week) (month and dat4 (time
the following:
Application of �ic`i,4,�.d� Ti4.C.C.�.v% �eXA1 4-7, A-16/
seeking approval under Section �` Co,vdt'iowcz L/sue
of the South Burlington Interim
Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to
AM
/1.Lt,.C�W �.�"'r _ " �jlil^ �'1'�..0 �% /`{f��' v-' - � � � % '/ '� y"tVG C� ✓ �'�°�.
DW
3/26/79
SUGGESTED MOTION OF APPROVAL
John Larkin and Richard Tarrant
1185 Shelburne Road
South Burlington, Vermont
That the South Burlington City Council approve the conditional use
application of John Larkin and Richard Tarrant of 1185 Shelburne
Road, South Burlington, Vermont allowing for the construction of
seventeen (17) residential units on Kennedy Drive, according to
the proposal of record, based on the following findings and sub-
ject to the following stipulations:
Findings:
The proposed use is consistent with the health, safety and welfare
of the City of South Burlington and standards 2,3 and 4 of Section
5 of the Interim Zoning Regulations. The area was zoned for the
proposed use under the 1974 regulations.
The proposed use is consistent with standards 1 and 5 based on
the evidence presented by the applicant.
Stipulations
1) that this residential complex conform to the City sub -division
regulations.
2) that this complex be served by municipal sewer and water
facilities.
3) that this approval is limited to the use proposed and shall
expire six months from this date (for commencement of the date).
PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTH BURLINGTON
PLANNING COMMISSION
the South Burlington Planning Com-
nisslon will hold a public hearing at -
'he South Burlington City Hall, Con-
'erence Room, 1175 Williston Rood.
South Burlington, Vermont on Tues-
fay, November 13, 1979 at 7:30 P.h- .
'a consider the following: i
I. Final application of Wallace b
Margaret Blanchard to subdivide o
)ne (1) acre lot into two lots (.6 acre
and A acre) located at 62 East Ter -
'ace. The proposed subdivision is
)ounded by properties of Daniel
ieorge, George Deforge and the
)uorry Hill Tennis Club.
1. Final plat application of L.T.H.
4ssociates to construct a 17 unit
morlment complex on a 2.5 acre
)arcel directly southeast of 200 Ker-
)edy Drive. The proposed sub- i
livision is bounded by Kennedy
)rive on the northwest, and on h1e
)ost and south by lands of Fp,es-
'ork Realty Corporation,
I. Final plat application of the
Glenwood Corporation for sub
Iivlsion approval of Phase II of the
itonehedge development: Phase 11
:onsists of 109 condominium unit;,
and Is bounded on the west by land)
)f the City of South Burlington, or.
'he north by Phase I, on the east by
ands of Campbell, Blanchard.
Hellish, Lowlor and Koolewit) o,-j
)n the south by lands of Nowlond.
copies of the applications are cyoil-
able for public inspection at .tire
South Burlington City Hall. _
--Sidney B. Poger
Chairman
South Burlington
Planning Commission
October 27, 1979
PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTH BURLINGTON
PLANNING COMMISSION
The South Burlington Planning Corn -
mission will hold a public hearing at
the South Burlington City Hall, Con-
ference Room, 1175 Williston Road,
South Burlington, Vermont, on Tues-
day, August 14, 1979 at 7:30 p.m., to
consider the following:
Preliminary plat application of
L.T.H. Associates to construct a 17
unit apartment complex on a 2.5 acre
parcel directly southeast of 200 Ken-
nedy Drive. The proposed sub-
division Is bounded by Kennedy
Drive on the northwest, and on the
east and south by lands of Forest
Park Realty Corporation.
Copies of the application are avail-
able for public inspection at the
South Burlington City Hall.
Sidney B. Poger
Chairman
South Burlington
Planning Commission
July 28. 1979
Y= YL P'Y U
O�Y♦♦O~ OYNQJc <N` bdOEN
Ip4N0oUo.
5£003or
�OfYC
-oS.cL
YaooOO;ooa
�.ccu'No�caEam+c—.
0c^0oo•>✓r�ag4^Q
d4Y
YV
moYoouo d� +OOJ-ozo
YO9>
z £nuE.
OaY£pocY
uCo_
jNOoo
o'^
c£w
I
t
hoC Oai - aooCuo�o
'
U U.4'co5oi-mc8i�" %ptcWC;cOnjEeo.,4 co -am— Q O�z-
ta0«Od
-LYu�c.�
Yc�OOYIYgo�N._0;ic">5
tocD¢c—C�
��Ir,na'Lo4�p+ t£"ryo EgEngcc£ '
ca e0,
N^C_pOuO00oO
t�Y1
GO�£}9'a
—Y,n
Zc=UCLN a:UOg22 n_C_O
a«m O�.
NN_cO
0Cloco `u,Nm
�EcC-0oY'��.
a'^,
CaW^000CGN£�O0-iO£
=P0n8�Cro EW:
70 5N a. - aNCCu,UEOfC-a
I.-YE_u°W�� O
:
Q oa �PNOot.y
PC nIoyu001r,
o�„LUOa-Lp =
"."',a
QNoCO
m �CaV
uocESc=cas U N•C UpE
nif00
.0=—cOcc,uoc> 0�ncoc«b.mEUEg°x8
r-n�� �£u
nD-at oCz
oacmn�a5a