Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0140 0150 Kennedy Drivesoot _... PLANNING & ZONING April 4, 2016 HVM Corporation, Inc. L.S. Hackett, Registered Agent P.O. Box 546 Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Tree Removal Violation — 140 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Hackett: It has come to my attention that you are in the process of removing two (2) large Pine trees from your 140 Kennedy Drive property. Section 13.06 (I) of the Land Development Regulations require site plan approval for any change to a site plan and the removal of trees would constitute such a change. You have 10 days from the date of this letter to contact me to discuss your project and apply for the required site plan approval. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely 1i Ray fond. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 2 JUNE 2009 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; M. Behr, G. Quimby, R. Farley, Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; L. Bresee, S. Hackett, R. Finamore, S. Riehley, P. O'Leary, M. Young, J. Leinwohl, M. Wamsganz, E. Fitch, S. Hood, J. Baird, G. B. Scriggins, S. Morrow, F. Hackett, J. Hodgson, R. Deane, H. Kendrew, B. Worthen, J. Cameron 1. Other Business & Announcements: Mr. Belair presented a request from John Larkin for a one-year extension to the Quarry Hill project. Ms. Quimby moved to grant a one-year extension on the Quarry Hill project of John Larkin, through 1 June 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Minutes of 19 May 2009: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 19 May 2009 as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Final Plat Application #SD-09-24 of Steve Hackett for a re -subdivision (boundary line adjustment) of two lots, 140 and 150 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Hackett said the adjustment is being made to accommodate the moving of a sign. Mr. Belair said the properties will be in full compliance after this. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-09-24 of Steve Hackett subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Site Plan Application #SP-09-43 of Heritage Flight to amend a previously approved plan consisting of: 1) constructing a 9,450 sq. ft. Customs & Border Patrol Protection facility, 2) reconstruction/renovating an existing 65,150 sq. ft. maintenance hangar, 3) constructing a 40,850 sq. ft. hangar all connected to the existing Pratt & Whitney hangar, and 4) installation of two 25,000 gallon and one 12,000 gallon above ground fuel tanks. The amendment consists of dividing the project into two phases to include site modifications. Phase I to consist of 1) constructing a 9,450 sq. ft. Customs & Border Patrol Protection facility, 2) reconstruction/renovating an existing 65,150 sq. ft. maintenance hangar, and 3) installation of two 25,000 gallon and one 12,000 gallon above ground fuel tanks. Phase II to consist of constructing a 40,850 sq. ft. hangar all connected to the existing Pratt & Whitney hangar, Aviation Avenue: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD \drb\sub\Hackett final.doc nda #3 Owner/Applicant HVM Corporation PO Box 2127 South Burlinqton, VT 05403 Location Map DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: May 27, 2009 Application received: May 11, 2009 HVM CORP- BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT 140 and 150 Kennedy Drive FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-09-24 Meetinq Date: June 2, 2009 Property Information Tax Parcel 970-00100 Tax Parcel 970-00150 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sublhackett\final subdoc Steve Hackett, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking final plat approval for a resubdivision (boundary line adjustment) of two (2) lots, 140 and 150 Kennedy Drive. The Board reviewed the sketch plan application on May 5, 2009 (minutes attached). No issues were raised and the Board instructed the applicant to proceed to the next level of review. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on May 11, 2009 and have the following comments. The applicant has provided a table including dimensional information about the proposed lots. Both meet the standards for the district, as the land exchanged is relatively small in comparison to the size of the lots. The property at 140 Kennedy Drive will increase from 2.10 acres to 2.25 acres. The property at 150 Kennedy Drive will decrease from 1.42 acres to 1.27 acres. The total land involved in exchange is 0.15 acres. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. No new buildings or infrastructure is proposed. Therefore, review by the Water Department or Water Quality Control department is not necessary. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. No new construction or alterations to grade are proposed. Therefore, an erosion control plan is not necessary as part of this application. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The existing access will not change. An access easement is proposed CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\hackett\final subdoc The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted do not depict Class II wetlands on the subject property. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The proposed project is in keeping with the planned development patterns of the Zoning District. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are no changes to the layout of the site. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. As no new infrastructure or buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the Fire Department. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. There are no changes necessary with respect to this criterion. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. As there are no changes to the road network and no new buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the City Engineer. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\hackett\final subdoc Staff finds the access and circulation on site to be appropriate and acceptable. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Changes to this criterion are not necessary as a result of this application. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. No new buildings are proposed at this time. Existing buildings are within the limitations of the district. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. No new buildings or infrastructure is proposed. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. No new buildings or infrastructure is proposed In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. At this time, Staff does not find a need for any additional access easements. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Landscaping No new construction is proposed; there are no minimum landscaping requirements. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\hackettlfinal subdoc Staff recommends that the Board approve Final Plat application #SD-09-24 of Steve Hackett, 140 and 150 Kennedy Drive. Respectfully submitted, A6a1Lhy*arn,%aRose, A,�sociate Planner Co;.y t,; C-te_,,e Ha: kt-:tt, HVM Corporation, applicant i DEVELOPMENT REV IEW BOARD 5 MAY 2009 PAGE 4 Mr. Dinklage asked Mr. Farrell to work with staff to remove some parking spaces. Mr. Farrell said he wasn't comfortable with that. Mr. Knudsen questions the parking spaces lost in the Creative Habitat renovation. Mr. Farrell said that will be put on the plan. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-19 until 19 May 2009. Mr. Behr seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Continued Preliminary Plat Application #SD-09-05 of Wedgewood Development Corporation for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) six two- family dwellings, and 2) three single family lots, 232 Autumn Hill Road: Mr. Belair said the applicant had asked for a continuance. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Preliminary Plat Application #SD-09-05 until 19 May 2009. Mr. Plumeau seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Sketch Plan Application 4SD-09-21 of Steve Hackett for a resubdivision (boundary line adjustment) of two lots, 140 and 150 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Hackett said they have to move a sign in order to comply with the sign ordinance. This property line adjustment will allow them to comply. Mr. Belair noted that the applicant owns both properties. If one of the properties were to change hands, there would have to be a deeded easement. No issues were raised. 6. Site Plan Application #SP-09-32 of Mountaha Handy to convert 3000 sq. ft. of retail space to personal service use on a lot which includes a convenience store with gas sales and a standardrestaurant, 26 Hinesburg Road: Ms. Lisius said this is the southernmost building on the site which is now retail. They want to convert 3000 sq. ft. to a hair salon. Mr. LaRose indicated a city right-of-way for future road widening. Mr. Dinklage noted that if Williston Road were to be widened, a lot of parking would be lost. Mr. Plumeau added that if the 12B interchange is built, that could happen. Mr. Belair noted that if a new building were to be proposed, the setback would be measured from the planned right-of-way. Mr. Dinklage asked about ways to add green space. Mr. Belair suggested possibly narrowing some driveway space. Mr. Knudsen said he wouldn't ask the applicant to spend a lot of money in relation to this use change. Other members agreed. The applicant indicated they would clean up the graffiti on the building. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to ever y person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). H A RING DATE; QQ�_Glyr% q AUE f HAnW-v Wa-m-s6&jZ_� -A It 4 -rc F/ � r � MAILING ADDRESS S.'OVAL-, y 7- © S'4 VF 3 100 L\-(- rw G�/v to (JJVV\k �'-$� v� O'D PROJECT OF INTEREST kLA6 is +- 4q-- h�L CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to ever y person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). H AR/NG DATE: _ di�M E� 6Ri4 0ic-7TTC S- -44T - c 1 G-(+A r--L�> (.RUucC U Lu �S' d9�T vv:�s Wo ► i� SO-L--�T-') �l Jim c4me. MAILING ADDRESS 5.f 6'6&V S'• �ar�u�GTonfl ���Io3_ PROJECT OF INTEREST 11t`x-rreo6 €, FL/6 fl`>' IZCoa iKP®R , 9 - + —�-er�+CLye- :f—t SO . � it o^ I u � •�(,!' r � � � T(y`�i i 1�i 1i� Qf'b� �`�'S 05403 �S Gam,, �s� • �� �`2�tT_"/�at.'— �75 1 b!80 5 ZL77vwi5 Zi Cf-t-n,w-e-11 '7V,, -D/Mf-�- at�jfj 0 %Dgp 3� e—liq n,, ., t,. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Conditional use application #CU-09-03 of Magic Hat Brewing Co. to install a 14 foot high fence, 5 Bartlett Bay Road. 91ine inaIplat application #SD-09-24 of Steve Hackett for a re -subdivision (boundary adjustment) of two (2) lots, 140 and 150 Kennedy Drive. 3. Preliminary plat application #SD-09-25 and final plat application #SD-09-26 of 1080 Shelburne Road, LLC for a planned unit development to: 1) raze an existing building formerly used as a restaurant, and 2) construct a 16,528 sq. ft. retail building, 1080 Shelburne Road. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. May 16, 2009 r M 1 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING May 13, 2009 HVM Corporation PO Box 2127 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public hearing notice that will be printed in The Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Stuart J. Morrow 6666 Spear Street Shelburne, VT 05482 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com May 13, 2009 Georgetown Homeowners Association c/o Property Management Associates PO Box 1201 Williston VT, 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in The Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, V-T 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com PLANNING & ZONING May 13, 2009 Winding Brook Homeowners Association c/o Sandy Lacroix Property Management 600 Blair Park, Suite 311 Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in The Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. TSi cerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT OS403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com PLANNING & ZONING May 13, 2009 Stonington Circle Owners Association c/o Sandy Lacroix Property Management 600 Blair Park, Suite 311 Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in The Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, JOWk Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT OS403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802,846.4101 www.sburl.com o, southb, urr f, 61" PLANNING & ZONING May 13, 2009 Kennedy Drive Professional Center Condominium Association c/o Fleischer Jacobs Group PO Box 2343 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in The Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com rr ,4 r �a southburlinoon PLANNING & ZONING Subdivision Plat Application Permit Number --�i- APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑ Preliminary X Final PUD Being Requested? ❑ Yes �,No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 0' So&kXa&1r Ll os4o -L100 FA 59) -q�JL!� No•W0 QK Z%4 -P&S. 3L`L-3Z( 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) _Qo . t5o BK (,- P& -e66. 37, 3Zz 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) �TE 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax (e %io SPrcPs� 1JT rr--r ` Lka USZ WC- \1 T © 4 d % 0 a. Contact email address: W L5 A NAY FA-st&2e 1► l NE 7 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: _]40 ,�D 15n & IAo - quo - oo Loo 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) & t50 _ `t-4o - ao 1S0 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Subdivision Plat Application 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): k-a LQ S r '� ea-r__ Q y ,a DAe �{ 15 5- w C. 0 ZD E-2 To 1?-�l-4 cA, rL i N S ��. ►J i� l4 O To co "' u_`I \AJ�'Tt1 fib{£ i�ULACZIDNS b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Ak JACO - (.Qooio 7e,Yt ©PF 3L\7 �► 1 rnC) 4000 %4 c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): v io c,,-�,,,,,G d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): a 5 b 1 e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): �, 4 f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): NA g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): K� A h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Subdivision Plat Application i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. 9. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) ex v5rrN&, 47-oaosED * 140 - 2.1V aG Z-16 AC_ a. Size of Parcel: ay50 I • 47- AL- I -Z1 Pc- (acres /sq. ft.) b. Building Coverage: � 140_ (o ooO I X> . rj Existincri5o - jp square feet* Ce . 5 % *� 010 - (a 000 Igo (o . 1 Proposed 150 - 40oo square feeag4 q .-L % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): tav- 2z,4zo ZZ1•5 Existingi5o 7-,s m3p square feet ,p % 140 - 7-5 a 2,S .ak) Proposed 15o ZZ}AoZ square feet 4Q. % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing �j A square feet % Proposed tiA square feet % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? Yes ❑ No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) t1tp c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 3 Subdivision Plat Application 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: (`,) SO. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping: $�,p� Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): ►v A 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: K" tt 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: N p-t ld Subdivision Plat Application 16. PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach on a separate sheet. "4 T Tn.c_k ti E D 17. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowle_.ge SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line 5 Subdivision Plat Application DATE OF SUBMISSION: I '//d9 I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: Complete, I ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee Nos. 140 -150 Kennedy Drive Abutters Georgetown Homeowners Association c/o Property Management Associates P.O. Box 1201 Williston, VT 05495 Winding Brook Homeowners Association c/o Sandy Lacroix Property Management 600 Blair Park - Suite 311 Williston, VT 05495 Kennedy Drive Professional Center Condominium Association c/o Fleischer Jacobs Group P.O. Box 2343 South Burlington, VT 05407 Stonington Circle Owners Association c/o Sandy Lacroix Property Management 600 Blair Park - Suite 311 Williston, VT 05495 FFF ARCHITECTS BURLINGTON, VERMONT Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 1 WE ARE SENDING HEREWITH, UNDER SEPARATE COVER, THE FOLLOWING: ❑ ORIGINALS ❑ SAMPLES ❑ SPECIFICATIONS ❑ PRINTS ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ PHOTOSTATS ❑ --- DATE January 27, 1986 PROJECT NUMBER2221-Hackett,Valine MacDonald-140 Kennedy Drive NUMBER OF COPIES DRAWING OR SPEC. NO. REVISED DATE Eight (8) copies- of Site Plan Eight (8) copies of Floor Plan Check No. 001709 in the amount of $30.00 Letter, dated January 23, 1986, from Hackett, Valine and MacDonald requesting appearance at February loth meeting. SENT VIA: ❑ AIR MAIL ❑ FIRST CLASS MAIL ❑ PARCEL POST ❑ EXPRESS .N OUR MESSENGER ❑ YOUR MESSENGER FREEMAN • FRENCH • FREEMAN gs 2500 SETS QCP 785 > > HACKETT VALINE & CEO MACDONALD, INC. INSURANCE 198 COLLEGE STREET January 23, 1986 P.O. BOX 488 BURLINGTON VERMONT 05402-0488 802-658-1100 Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Sir: I would like to apply to be included on the agenda of the Zoning Board meeting scheduled for 5:00 P.M. on Monday, February 10, for the purpose of reviewing our plans for renovations at 140 Kennedy Drive. Our check in the amount of $30.00, as well as the required sets of prints, are enclosed. Very truly yours, Z VALINE & 'kackett LFH/cr encs. cDONALD, INC. January 27, 1986 Mr. Fred Hackett HVM Corporation 198 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning appeal Dear Mr. Hackett: Be advised that the Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, Febr,,,ary 10, 1986 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a variance. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp NOTICE OF APPEAL r- .i ... SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD/ OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant F7 e:" .... Name, address of property owner Property location and description I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. �l Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on , at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: .#„ Appeal of a seeking w2,..a from Section �/� d , .* :��te et— 4 of the South Burlington Regulations. Request i for permission to �t a/ ir"' �s, � �:^�G•� 3. �"„�A a�'- �a.,... �.�c...t. �'-2,� tC.. ...mot-r-s�-c....�+�..�' _,�e,,,,rr.,,,,/.,-e.� ,.�..a-e �=C.,_.... /v0-�-� �J �•�''-�,-t��--'� f�...�'.<...� .,,."',a--u�GL.. i �-c-.t� G�� �� ate.. / �'v r 140 KENNEDY DRIVE EXISTING AREA: 2.10 ACRES BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT: +0.15 ACRES PROPOSED TOTAL AREA: 2.25 ACRES EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE: 6.5% PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE: 6.1% EXISTING TOTAL COVERAGE: 24.5% PROPOSED TOTAL COVERAGE: 25.9% 150 KENNEDY DRIVE EXISTING AREA 1.42 ACRES BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT: - 0.15 ACRES PROPOSED TOTAL AREA: 1.27 ACRES EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE: 6.5% PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE: 7.2% EXISTING TOTAL COVERAGE: 41.0% PROPOSED TOTAL COVERAGE: 40.5% BOTH PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 7 ZONING DISTRICT �_02'AG SEE NOTE 5 -�' W "� b$-$'W 5v 104.59, 171 298,24• _ a.2'AG - D67URBEO Kennedy Drive Professional Center �I, $ Condominium Association �� Vol. 167 Pgs. 433-480 4 Map Slide 215 rw _ 0.1T3G - p5m/RBED No. 140 SEE NOTE J aid _ Ae alw m rLSEENO� B 1 PARiVWSPACES 4 _T36.91 --_- 153.89' _ R-Tsw"' r�ss.ss-• -�rT Winding Brook Homepwners Association, Inc. Vol. 276 Pg.. 588-612 Map Slide 178 MG �_ DART =E I N 19 1Ar $22 �. O N SPACECES _ l O.JAG' O No. 150 28g9� P SEE NOTE J �J 1 _221.0"�-► 66.0w 96 R i�� 56301.15� 62.95• _ Stonington Circle Owners Association, Inc. Sa No7E LEG_ Georgetown Homeowners Association 0171 0.3AG IRON PIN FOUND PATH OUTSIDE DIAMETER & DISTANCE ABOVE - BELOW GRADE - O CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND O 5/8• REINFORCEMENT BAR WITH SURVEY MARKER TO BE SET p CALCULATED POINT - - BOUNDARY LINE REFERENCE LINE - - - EASEMENT - RIGHT OF WAY LINE OE OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINE z), UTILITY POLE NC)TF'-;- 1. The boundary survey was performed with a total station. 2. The bearings are referenced to magnetic north with a declination of +/- 15 degrees west. 3. 140 Kennedy Drive is in the name of H.V.M. Corporation, reference Volume 214 pages 319-321 and Map Slide 111. 150 Kennedy Drive is In the name of H.V.M. Corporation, reference Volume 638 pages 321-322 and Map Slide ill. 4. Kennedy Drive has Is 100 feet wide and owned byy the City of South Burlington, reference Volume 66 page 487 and the State of Vermont Highway Project U528-2[iJS.A. A portion of 140 Kennedy Drive was taken by the City of South Burlington in 2004. reference Volume 681 pages 394-453 and the State of Vermont Highway Project NH 121-1[il 5. There is a thirty foot wide utility easement along the northerly boundary of the Kennedy Drive Professional Center Condominium Association parcel from Hinesburg Road to 140 Kennedy Drive parcel, reference Volume 139 pages 488-487. 6. There is an electrical easement to Green Mountain Power Corporation, reference Volume 176 page 323. The location of easement was not determined. 7. There Is an access easement for the 140 Kennedy Drive parcel, reference Volume 186 pages 449-450, from Kennedy Drl- There is a proposed reciprocal access easement for both parcels. 8. There is a drainage and pipe easement to Sam Remo Realty Corporation, reference Volume 214 pages 319-321. I CM" THAT us PLAT IS BASED ON RECOPD RESEA" n D MFAST.REME7I7S ANO Ei WWCE. pate Checked AWD oT PEW7WE7ET M.YOPIlA710N T PUT OOIRlES Win 77E REoullaD6 I7s of Y.SA 27 SELBON 1403 AND GOW ORMS WIN 7NE STATE STANDARDS FOP 7W PRACIILE OF LAW SUP1£mNG. 7NS PUT WAS PRODIIfED By AN AW J PEOr7ER Drawn by. Date: Checlmd by FJM Am--d bv. Scale: IP-1., STUART J. MORROW LLS. 565 AO 20 30 60 120 180 2,40 RNAL RESUBDIVISION PLAT PROPER77ES OF H.M.V. Corporation 140 and 150 Kennedy Drive SWMT d NORRaw 1• = 60• Consulting Land Surveyor Shelburne, Vemimt No.: 0 1-ws-eeaa RECEIVED APR 11 2009 City of So. Burlington AGREEMENT This Agreement made this � y // day of February, 1983 between Kennedy Professional Associates, a Vermont partnership ("Kennedy") and San Remo Realty Cor:pany, a Vermont general partnership ("San Remo"): 4d I T td E S S E T H: WHEREAS, in a deed of San Remo Realty Corpoiation (now San Remo) to Kennedy dated December 29, 1977, recorded in Vol. 139 at Page 256 of the South Burlington Land Re-ords, it reserved a right of way in land of Kennedy and said deed does not specifically eescribe the location thereof, and the parties hereto desire to provide such description and to define their respective obligations for the maintenance of said right of way and a sewer line used by them in common. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties, for themselves, their successors and assigns, agree as follows: 1. The right of way reserved to San Remo in land of Kennedy for use in common with Kennedy, for access to land of San Remo lying westerly thereof shall consist of that area which is presently Paved and used for that purpose. The center line thereof, at the entrance on Kennedy Drive is approximately 67.5 feet easterly of the property line between San Remo and Kennedy and the width of said right of way, at that point, is approximately 29 feet. At a point in said center line which is approximately 50 feet northerly of the northerly curb line of Kennedy Drive, said right of way turns westerly to property of San Remo for a distance of approximately 57 feet with a width of approximately 20 feet. San Remo will, in addition to said right of way for access, have an easement in that parcel of land of Kennedy which is bounded on the north and east by said driveway and on the south and west by the property lines of Kennedy for underground utilities, purposes ofIlandscaping and planting for the mutual advantage of the properties of the parties. 2. The parties hereto will share, on an equal basis, all costs associated with the upkeep of that part of said right of way the use of which is shared by both of the C_ parties hereto. 3. The parties shall also share on an equal basis all costs incurred for the maintenance of a 6-inch sewer line at the frontage of the property of Kennedy which serves the properties of both of tale parties hereto, to the e}-tent that the parties are responsible for such costs. IN WITNESS WFEREOF, the parties have caused this instrument to be executed as of the date first abpve written. in the Presence nr: STATE OF VEKIONT SAIN R;nTO BEAT �r, (-P ., y Authotiz(ld Agent KEi,TNEPY PROFESS101"A?: ASSOCIATES A Partner, CHI T�'DEN COUNTY At South Burlington, this ; day of , 1983 personally appeared JArIES PIZZA It'.Lt,Z Duly Authorized Agent of San Remo Realty Company and he acknowledged the foregoing agreement to be his act and deed and the free act and deed of said partnership. Be fore mc-, Notary Puic r0y rl7 i llciv��� r't li ^ � STATE OF VERMONT �� �Lb 10, 1937 � CHITTENDEN COUNTY At South Burlington, this da,1 of February, 1983, personally appeared ARTHUR BERGN , a partner of Kennedy Professional Associates and he acknowledged the foregoing agreement to be his act and deed and the free act and deed of said partnership. Before me, , .. �;�,� { (� _ C� otary u c February 6, 1986 Mr. Hackett Hackett, Valine and MacDonald 198 College Street P.O. Box 488 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 140 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Hackett: Enclosed are the minutes of the January 28, Commission meeting at which your site plan Please call me if you have any questions. JBL/mcp CC: William Wiese S incerely, 1986 Planning was approved. Jane B. Lafleur, C i ty Planner Memorandum November 26, 1985 agenda items November 22, 1985 Page 4 6 ) SAN REMO REALTY`', San Remo Realty is selling the office property at 140 Kennedy Drive. An attorney noticed that the original subdivision had not been recorded within the required 90 days in 1970 when it was part of a 3 lot subdivision and in 1977 when it was reviewed again because of the mistake in the filing deadline, among other reasons. The City Attorney advises the Commission to pass the attached resolution that validates the subdivision. It is not sufficient to restamp the record copy because the plan approval date would follow the filing date. I will have a copy of the plan at the meeting. 7) SUBDIVISION AND SITE PLAN DEADLINES: These will be reviewed at the meeting. 8) SUMMIT MEETING WITH BURLINGTON: An agenda will be available at the meeting for discussion purposes. If this discussion looks worthwhile to you, a possible date is December 17, 1985. We hope to at least discuss some of the issues of mutual concern i.e. traffic, as well as those of conflict. If no understanding or agreement can be reached on these topics, perhaps we can agree on a cultural exchange between our two cities. PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JANUARY 1986 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 28 January 1986, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Mary -Barbara Maher, Chairman; Catherine Peacock, John Belter, William Burgess, Judith Hurd, Peter Jacob Others Present Jane Lafleur, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Amy Justice, State Dept. of Agriculture; Fred Hackett, Alan Gigure, David Spitz, Mery Brown, Bob Powell 1_. Minutes of 14 January 1986 Ms. Hurd moved that the Minutes of 14 January 1986 be approved as printed. Ms. Peacock seconded, and the motion passed unan- imously. 2. Continue site plan a lication of John Larkin for construction of a 6,912 sq. ft. office building aShalburne R. Mrs. Maher reminded the Commission that they had the option of reviewing the application as a ped and rejecting it because it did not meet the 4-acre lot minimum. In polling the Commission, concensus was that members would require a traffic study. Mr. Blanchard indicated that they then would propably opt to come back with only one building. He added that because he felt two buildings was a better alternative, he v+ould like members to re- consider and let them use the traffic.overlay as a study. Mrs. Maher indicated it was the Commission's wish that a traffic study be done. Mrs. Hurd then moved that the applicant be asked to come back with a revised plan or with a traffic s u wi hin 60 days o January 14, b., r thegi tr- nl an A��1 i caf inn jail 1 hr- autnmatically .deni2d__ Mr. Jacob seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Site 21aan aap lication of Hackett, Valine & MacDonald ,for con- structio� n off' an additional 6,000 s, i oF OfTice space win existing building at 140 Kenne y Drive Mrs. Lafleur advised that an earlier Commission had given approval for 2 floors. It had then been discovered that a basement had been constructed. The owner at that time was informed that the basement area could not be used. The current applicant is re- questing -approval to use 2,650 sq. ft. of that basement. Mr. Hackett explained that they were not aware of the previous problem when they bought the building and only learned of it when they applied for a building permit. They bought the PLANNING COMMISSION 28 January 1986 page 2 building for their own company use, although one current tenant will remain until they find an alternate location. Hackett, Valine & MacDonald is renovating 3/4 of the building and want to develop part of the basement for an employee lounge, kitchen, bathrooms, conference room, mail room, and project room. There will be no regular office space in the basement. Mrs. Maher asked whether the Planner thought finishing the basement would generate,addi- tional traffic. Mrs. Lafleur said probably not, but she was concerned about parking spaces. Mrs. Maher asked if Mr. Hackett felt they would have enough parking, and Mr. Hackett replied he was confident they would. Mr. Burgess asked whether the Commission could prevent someone in the future from finishing off the basement for office uses some years down the line. Mrs. Lafleur said the Commission could stipulate the allowable uses. Mr. Burgess then moved the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Hackett,a ine & MacDona or confersion of 2b5O sq. rt. of the ex s in shed basFm—ent o a kitchen, lounge and conference facilities as depicEFT on 1. Uses shall be restricted to those uses in the above paragraph: a kitchen, employee lounge,_and conference- room only. 2. Eleven arkin& spaces are waived for the additional 2650 s . TET of finishedoor area. 3. The Kennedy Drive sidewalk shall remain. 4. A walkway shall be provided for the back entrance to the westerly parking lot. 5 The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. Mr. Belter seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Mr. Hackett asked that the Commission confirm that they have permission for 2 bathrooms, storage room, mail room, project room, and conference room, and the Commission so confirmed. Sketch plan application of Alan F. Gi�,ure for 2 lot subdivision of a 0 sq. t at 231 h'irFiy Rd. and �Airport � = Parkway Mr. Gigure advised this is the southeast corner of' the inter- section. The 2 lots will be 16,977 sq. ft. and 12,038 sq. ft. Mrs. Lafleur noted the, City Manager recommended that the small parcel across the road be deeded to the city and said she will check on the reason for this. Mr. Gigure proposes to build a duplex on lot ##2. The single family house on Lot ##1 will remain. 1/28/86 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Hackett, Valine and MacDonald for conversion of 2650 square feet of the existing unfinished basement to a kitchen, lounge and conference facilities as depicted on plans entitled "Office Building, 140 Kennedy Drive, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by J.G. Architects, last revised 1/20/82 and "Hackett, Valine and MacDonald, Inc., 140 Kennedy Drive, South Burlington, Vermont - Floor Plans/E lev's", prepared by Freeman, French, Freeman, dated 1/3/86 with the following stipulations: Eleven parking spaces are waived for the additional 2650 square feet of finished floor area. 2. The applican hall mee with the Sout-Burlingt� Fire Chief to review pla and work details of new firs- hydrant. A bond shall e posted r this hydra if nece,s�`ary. State approval hall be tained. 3. The Kennedy Drive sidewalk shall remain. 4. A walkway shall be provided for the back entrance to the westerly parking lot. 5. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Chief James W. Goddette, Sr. Re: January 28, 1986 agenda items Date: 1/23/86 1) GIGURE - AIRPORT PARKWAY, 2 LOT SUBDIVISION Overall I do not see a problem. There must be a proper drive to get one truck in, or a parking area. 2) HACKETT, VALINE & MCDONALD,""140 KENNEDY DRIVE Plans have been reviewed by the fire department. Overall the building location is good but a second hydrant is needed because of water supply required. I do not see a problem if approved as long as some one comes in to work out details of hydrant. Also, when the building was approved by the state, the basement area could not be used for anything but storage unless it was sprinklered since it is a windowless area. State approval is required for this. New �D�`Se.v�e�rt ac 0 -� M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission V-.YLV� From: Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner Re: January 28, 1986 agenda items Date: January 23, 1986 2) JOHN LARKIN, 408 SHELBURNE ROAD Steve Stitzel our City Attorney has confirmed that we may require level of service traffic data and a full traffic study from this applicant. His position is that this application was handled incorrectly to begin with and left the Commission with a problem. The Commission has the discretion to review this as a planned commercial development and deny it for not meeting the four acre requirement. However, he suggested it may be better to compromise and require a traffic study for this one case. Burlington Planning Director,Mark Eldridge, told me that Burlington would require a traffic study for this type of development. They have no formal criteria of how to review the study; however they informally use level of service "C" as a cut off, as we do. I suggest that you require John Larkin to submit a traffic study indicating the present and post development levels of service at designated intersections. If he chooses not to, the Commission should deny the site plan application for lack of sufficient traffic data or allow him to formally withdraw his application. 3) HACKETT, VALINE AND MACDONALD, 140 KENNEDY DRIVE The applicant has purchased the 18,000 square foot office building at 140 Kennedy Drive from Pizzagalli Corporation. HVM proposes to convert 2650 square feet of the 6000'square foot basement to use- able space. It is presently unfinished. Originally, the Planning Commission granted site plan approval to Pizzagalli for a 12,000 square foot office on two floors. Upon investigation, David Spitz discovered two floors and a full basement had been constructed. He put them on notice for violation of the site plan and use of the basement was denied. This applicant wants to convert the basement to a kitchen, lounge and conference facilities. No additional offices will be in the basement. The construction cost is estimated at $265,500. Forty eight parking spaces exist to meet the parking requirements of the 12,000 square foot office; the applicant feels these are sufficient. The 2,650 square feet will require 11 additional spaces representing a 19% waiver. The site can not handle additional spaces. Memorandum January 28, 1986 agenda items January 23, 1986 Page 2 Access, circulation, and landscaping are adequate. See Bill's and Jim's memo. 4) GIGURE, 231 KIRBY ROAD, SKETCH PLAN The applicant proposes to subdivide the 29,000 square foot lot into two lots measuring 16,977 square feet with an existing house and garage and 12,038 square feet. A duplex will be permitted on the smaller lot with access from Airport Parkway. There do not see to be any particular problems with this proposal. See Bill's and Jim's memos. 5) VERMONT STRUCTURAL STEEL, HINESBURG ROAD The applicant has provided two additional options for open space/ recreational areas. Both options increase the buffer strip along Hinesburg Road to continue the Butler Farms precedent. Option I increases the size of the proposed open space adjacent to Butler Farms to six acres. It provides a pedestrian buffer along the stream/drainageway that will allow skiing or walking to adjacent parcels, such as to the Calkins property. Its proximity to Butler Farms provides open space for that development as well. I am concerned that this open site is not well drained and may not be a suitable recreation area without a good drainage plan. Bruce and I plan to visit the site Tuesday. However, it is probably not the best time of year to judge drainage. Option II, places the open area at the northern end of the development with 2 acres in the residential area and 8 acres in the industrial area. By using these industrial acres as part of the total, the applicant proposes to increase the number of lots to 130 which is still less than the maximum of 156. They propose to offer 13.5 acres of open space, which is above the 15% required. Both options offer access to the industrial lot and remove this access acreage from the total for calculating open space. Of the two options, Bruce and I prefer the second option due to the potential of connecting with other properties and the size of the parcel. This option also provides a buffer of sorts to the industrial land. However, I still feel a better option is on the residentally zoned land in the northwest corner but these are the best residential lots and use of residential land for open space will result in smaller lots. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: January 28, 1986 agenda items Date: January 24, 1986 3) OFFICE BUILDING, 140 KENNEDY DRIVE 1. Plan shows Kennedy Drive sidewalk at entrance drive removed. I do not believe that is the intent. 2. A walkway should be provided from back entrance to westerly parking lot. 4) HARRY R. GIGURE, AIRPORT PARKWAY 1. The small parcel across Airport Parkway should be deeded to the City. January 22, 1986 Mr. Hackett Hackett, Valine and MacDonald 198 College Street P.O. Box 488 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: 140 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Hackett: Enclosed are the agenda and a copy of my memo to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present to represent your request on Tuesday, January 28, 1986. Sincerely, Jane B . Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls cc: William Wiese SITE PLANS MUST SHOW THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION (PLEASE SUBMIT 4 COPIES) Lot Drawn to Scale (20' preferred) Location of Streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings and landscaping Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways Proposed landscaping plan (#, variety, size) equal to or greater than required amount in Zoning Regulations # and location of parking spaces (9'xl8') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required # and location of handicapped spaces Location of Septic Tanks (etc) if on -site sewer Location of any easements Lot coverage ratio for building alone ( foot print) and building, parking and outside storage Location of site (street # or lot #) Name of person or firm preparing Site Plan and date fr �I February 5, 1982 Pizzagalli Construction Company Mr. Michael Tcxi kowicz 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 140 Kennedy Drive Dear Mike: Regarding the sewer situation at your office complex located at 140 Kennedy Drive. Be advised that we will require a revised plan and a state,aent of compliance to those changes as spelled out in a memorandLun (1/27/82) by William Szymanski. Until the sewer situation is approved by the City no certificate of occupancy will be issued. I suggest you work on these changes as soon as possible due to the fact that the second floor is presently occupied. without a certificate you are in direct violation. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. R(ru/mcg Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer MEMORANDUM To: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: San Remo Realty Office Building, 140 Kennedy Drive Date: 1/27/82 1. Pumping station top and valves should be in a pit with cast iron cover for maintenance and quick access. 2. Discharge piping should include a emergency pump connection. 3. Discharge line is connected to a private service of adjacent building, this is not permitted. A variance under some conditions may be given however, written agreement must be prepared between owners defining responsibility for maintenance. 4. There must be a minimum of 10 feet horizontal separation between water main and sewerline also 18 inch vertical and below water main at crossings. 5. Sewer force main must be below frost line or insulated to protect against freezing. PLEASE DIRECT ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: FORM NO. P-160 (REV. 9/79) Mr. Dick Ward Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington X WE ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: pC0* PIZZAGALLI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 50JOY DRIVE/SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 802/658-4100 TELEX 954611 TRANSMITTAL DATE OJECT NO. PR January 26, 1982 8403 PROJECT 140 Kennedy Drive Office Building South Burlington, Vermont UNDER SEPARATE COVER WE ARE SENDING THE FOLLOWING: COPIES NUMBER DESCRIPTION CODE 1 State Land Use Perm' I A FOR INITIAL APPROVAL B FOR FINAL APPROVAL C APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION REQUIRED D APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION NOT REQUIRED E DISAPPROVED - RESUBMIT F QUOTATION REQUESTED G APPROVED N O REMARKS: H FOR APPROVAL I AS REQUESTED OR REQUIRED J FOR USE IN ERECTION K LETTER FOLLOWS L FOR FIELD CHECK M FOR YOUR USE CC By Michael Tomkowicz, Real Estate Property Mgr. State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT CASE No. PR- 4 - 0 5 9 8 ) LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT SAN REMO REALTY CORP. ) ADDRESS 50 Joy Drive ) Vermont State Board of Health S. Burlington, VT 05401 ) Regulations, Chapter 5, Sanitary Engineering, Subchapter 1, Public Buildings, Subchapter 1S, Plumbing This project, consisting of a two-story, 12,000 square foot office building for approximately 40 employees, located at 140 Kennedy Drive, in the city.of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions: (1) The project must be completed as shown on the plans S-1 dated May 28, 1981, and on Sheet P-1 dated June 21, 1981, prepared by J.G. Architects, Inc., and which have been stamped "APPROVED" by the Division of Protection. No alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where written application has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained, (2) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon re- quest, shall be made available for inspection by State and local person- nel. (3) The Vermont Department of Health is to be contacted in regard to any regulations and/or licenses required by their department. (They may be contacted at 60 Main Street, Burlington, Vermont, or by phoning 802-862-5701, ext, 321.) (4) The applicant is reminded that all plumbing material and workmanship must meet the standards of the Vermont Health Regulations, Chapter 5, Subchapter 1S - Plumbing; the National Plumbing Code; and the requirements of the Vermont Fire Prevention Section of the Depart- ment of Labor and Industry. (S) Upon completion of the rough in for the waste plumbing, and prior to said plumbing being covered or closed in, the Agency of Envir- onmental Conservation is to be contacted so that we may have the opport- unity to inspect the workmanship. (6) A cleanout, brought to grade and properly capped, is to be placed approximately 100 feet from the point where ----the 5—inch--sanitary-- -- -- sewer leaves the building, k PB-4-0598 - ? - (7) The 5-inch sanitary sewer is to pass under the existing water main so that there is 18 inches of clearance between the bottom of the water line and the crown of the sewer. If this can- not be met, the applicant is to submit a diagram for the waterline/ sewerline,prior to the covering of the sewer,to the Division of Protection for final approval. Dated at Essex, Vermont, this 27th day of July, 1981. CC: P. Howard Flanders, P.E. City of South Burlington Fire Prevention Department of Health FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer 520 3 COMPLETE PACKAGED SYSTEMS Myers offers 4 basic pumping systems or (Mini -lift stations) for outdoor installation of grinder pumps. Systems have fiberglass basins with steel cover, lift out assembly, piping, controls and accessories for complete installation. All parts except pumps and electrical control box are packaged inside of basin for shipping. Basins are mounted on wooden skid base and are protected with cardboard cartons. 24" x 60" Basin Model B12-2460 SIMPLEX 24" x 78" Basin Model B12-2478 DUPLEX 30" x 60" Basin 30" x 78" Basin Model B12-3060 Model B12-3078 Simplex and duplex systems are also available for inside installation. 30" x 36" fiberglass basin with cover, piping, controls and accessories are furnished. All parts are packaged and shinnPci inside electric control box are shipped separate. basin. Pump and SIMPLEX 30" x 36'' Basin Model 812-3036 DUPLEX 30" x 36" Basin Model B12-3036D 4/ cAST -ate . NCLOJV CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: a) Owner of Record HVM Corporation 198 College Street, P.O. Box 488, Burlington, Vermont 05402 (658-11 ) b) Applicant Hackett, Valine & MacDonald, Inc. 198 College St., P.O. Box 488, Burlington, Vt 05402 (658-1100) c) Contact Person William Wiese II, Freeman. French. Freeman, Inc. P. 0. Box 306, Burlington, Vermont 05402 Tel. #864-6844 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 140 Kennedy Drive 3 ) PROPOSED USE(s) Office 4) SIZE OF PROJECT: (i.e. Building Square Footage, #units, maximum height and # floors Gross Area 6000 "s. f./floor; 2 floors + basement = 18,000 s. f. 5 ) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES ( full and part time): 35 full time 6) LOT COVERAGE: Building 6.4% %; Building, Parking, Outside Storage: 22.9 % 8) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings: $ 265,500.00 Landscaping $ as is Other Site Improvements: (Please list with cost) $ 0 9) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: May 1, 1986 10) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 94 - 100 11) PEAK HOUR(s) OF OPERATION: 8:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. 12) PEAK DAY(s) OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday February 24, 1981 San Remo Realty Corporation Mr. Ronald Bouchard 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 140 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Bouchard: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment has granted approval. of your request for a zoning variance. The Board will issue formal findings at a later date. Your proposal is subject to site plan approval by the Planning Commission, please contact Mr. David Spitz for scheduling. If you have any questions don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg U Uj December 29, 1981 Ronald Bouchard San Rena Realty Corporation 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, Vc Ymont 05401 Dear Ron, On April 7, 1981, the South Burlington Planning Commission granted approval for a 12,000 square foot office building at 140 Kennedy Drive. The approved site plan indicated a 75 foot by 80 foot building, or 6000 square feet per floor. It has come to my attention that a three-storW building is being constructed at the above address. I have been told further that the top two floors are intended to be used for office purposes but that the basement will not be so used. This letter is official notification that any office use of the basement floor will constitute a violation of. the April 7, 1981 site plan approval. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner DS/mca Certified letter #P341817474 cc: Richard Ward Keep f?*qck of "'ForCewte+j 9n 415. PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 7, 1()81 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, April 7, 1981 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; George Mona, Kirk Woolery, Ernest Levesque, James Ewing, Robert Walsh Member Absent Peter Jacob Others Present David Spitz, Planner; F.B. Johnson, Sky Thurber, Debbi & David Martell, Chuck Thweatt, Walt Bruska, Carl Cobb, William Schuele, Judy Hurd, Roberta Coffin, Madlyn Morrissey Minutes of March 31, and April 1, 1981 At the bottom of page 2 of the March 31 minutes, Mr. Mona noted that he had made a statement about variety stores. He noted that he was not opposed to such stores, but was just pointing out that the City Council had decided that they were inappropriate. Mr. Woolery moved to approve the March 31, 19el minutes as amended, Mr. Ewing seconded the motion and all voted aye. Mr. Poger moved to accept and enter into the record the April 1, 1981 minutes, with its august assemblage and its wonderous meeting Mr. Mona seconded the motion and all voted aye. tinuation of application b San Remo Realty_Corporatio3 for site plan roval of a 12,000 sq. ft. of i uilding at 140 ennedv Drive Mr. Spitz said his list of small objections from the last meeting had been resolved. He added that the City Engineer did not feel the Church of God property would be adversly affected by this development. Clcsing of the curb cut was discussed. Mr. Poger wanted it closed before a building permit was issued. Mr. Johnson, representing San Remo Realty, said the cut was on land owned by Reilly Tire. When the stipulation to close it was imposed was discussed. Mr. Spitz said it was imposed in the 1979 subdivision approval and Mr. Johnson replied that if it was a condition of subdivision approval, and was never done, they would do it now. If it was a condition of the fill permit, he objected to doing it. Mr. Spitz said the 1979 application was called a subdivision because the original 3 lot subdivision was never recorded and thus, it was reviewed again. Mr. Poger ruled that the Commission could require San Remo to close the cut. Mr. Woolery said he had noticed a lot of iridescence in the water in that area. Mr. Mona suggested asking for a molded curb to channel that water back to the right of way. Mr. Poger hoped tiie Zoning Administrator would check into this. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission_ap!rove the site_21an application of San Remo Real_t�-Cor oration for a 12,000 sq. t�._pffice building. as depicted_on a Alan entitled "Pr9posed__Uff.ice Building,. 140 Kennedy Drive,, ,_dated March_31� 1981, prepared by Julian Goodrich, 2. PLANNING COMYISSION APRIL 7. 1981 Architect, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Fill slope shall be graded and seeded and an appropriate bond in an amount to be deterined_by the City _Planner shall-_be_provided. 2. Building roof' drains must outlet at a location which does not erode the fill area. - - 3. A landscaping bond of t8,000 shall be Provided. The administration may. allow some credit for the existing trees. 4. This site plan approval expires in 6 months. 5. The -present curb cut to the west on Kennedy Drioe.must be closed before a_building permit is issued. Mr. I:ona seconded the motion. —� Mr. Poger stated that he felt bad about the filling and would abstain from voting on the motion. Mr. Ewing also felt bad about it, but noted that the application met all the requirements and he saw no reason not to vote for it now. The motion carried with Mr. Poger abstaining. Continuation of warned public hearing on application by GBIC for preliminary plat a.;proval of a 55,700 sq ft building for a light manufacturing operation on Hinesburg Road south of Interstate 89 Ns. Spitz reported, that the City Council had passed the zone change on a 4-1 vote last night. He added that the actual size of the building; would be 59,800 sq. ft. The zoning will become effective in 21 days and the City Attorney has suggested that the final plat application not be approved until 7 days after the zoning goes into effect. The administration feels it is proper to take action now on preliminary plat. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission a��rove the preliminary plat application of Greater Burlington Industrial Cor oration for a 59,800 sq. ft. industrial building _ on Hinesburg Road south of I $9 as de icted on a lap entitled "MITEL Mountain --- ___^P-_-_.--.-- -- —_� _.__.p Mountain View Industrial Park" last revised 2 27 81 - _. _ _ , _prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, subject to the followin - g stipulations: 1. All traffic information shall be reviewed during the course of final plat review.. Items for discussion shall include: _ _ a. Improvements for the intersection of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road to handle present and projected traffic. Also required would be a phased schedule and responsibility for the improvements .. - keyed _to_the issuance of this and future building permits. b. Potential signing or other, modif ieations for Old Farm Road, to discourage through traffic. C. Lengths ..of -bypass lane antideceleration lane_intersectiprL of HinesburE_Road and the industrial park entrance. Z. The sewage numpinE_station shall be served_by an unobstructed. .g _ 1 ______p -. ---. g- access road with at least, a rave surface. A arkin and turnaround._area ___ MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission Prom: n,rvid if. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 4/3/81 2) San Remo Realty Questions on site plan details have been resolved since last meeting. Drainage is also satisfactory. All parking areas will drain to a storm drain inlet. Drain- age is not expected to have an adverse input on the Church of God property. Itre curb cut that has not yet been closed is on the Reilly Tire property. 3) M I'1'f ;I, G111C The following in the prc>IX ed motion with stipulations for the preliminary plat �r1,l,rcivoI f()r the M['I(;1. irxllr:;trial dove IOIvx�nt. Note th,rt several itc•rrr; (, .�1. 1,11xl- :x,1�in<1) which have lx•en di:;cu:;:;c,ci at Plannirx3 Cc,noni:;.;ic,n m(�eting3 arcs 1x•ing :;tipulateri for re:,ulmis,ion bccau�,(- final details have not yet bean provided to tau, jKlministration. For the Preliminary Plat application of Greater Burlington Industrial Corp- oration for a 55,000 to 60,000 square foot industrial building on Hinesburg Road south of I-89 as depicted on a plan entitled, "MITEL, Mountain View Industrial Park", last revised 2/27/81, prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers: Stipulations: 1) All traffic information shall be reviewed during the course of final plat review. Items for discussion shall include: a) It>tent.ial impr(nvemonts for the intersection of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg RO,Id . b) Potential signing or other modifications for Old Farm Road. c) Lengths of bypass lane and deceleration lane at the intersection of Hinesburg Road and the industrial park entrance. 2) The "possible location, Swift Street extension" shall be deleted. 3) The sewage pumping station shall be served by an unobstructed access road with at least a gravel surface. A parking and turnaround area shall be provided at the pumping station. 4) Water service shall be provided to the pumping station. 5) Sewer easements shall be provided across the applicant's property to the south- w(�:,t corner of the Wright projx�rty and 'the northwest corner of the Wiles property to allow po sible future sewer connections to abutting properties on the east side of 11ine:;burg Road. 6) A 15 foot pedestrian trail easement leading towards the quarry on the Green Acres property shall be provided along the rear southerly boundary of the applicant's property. The exact location shall be reviewed by the Trails came ttee. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 24, 1981 Proposed are 2 bedroom units, some flats and some townhouses. The existing house will be renovated. 40 parking spaces for the 20 units are propo:►ed. Mr. Pot-er felt that access was in a bad place here and he said that t multiplying the 4 units on the land now by 5 in an area with a slope like that and with the traffic there did not seem like a good idea. Ile felt that, as far ata safety, that area would not be able to handle 20 units, in his opinion. He felt that cars passed.the site very fast, going either up or down the hill. Mr. Ewing asked about a common access with the property to the north and Mr. :spitz said he would look into it. Having the entrance to the property farther south, beyond the brook, was mentioned. This would be off the slope and farther from the major intersection. Mr. Fwirr FcJod that that be checked into. Mr. Pover still felt 20 units was too many. Mr. cawing felt the board needed a topo of the area. Mr. eo,-er rsu.- �stF:d atuut 1 2 the number of units roj,oaed. Mr. spitz was not sure � f / P ""Ot 4�,unu��er the access farther down the hill would be feasible ���� CoM,►y,oh 0" Vy� uv It �c�Fo ' l �e�able, i Application by alas Remo Realty Corporr:tion for site plan apj-roval of a 12,000 squhre foot office building at 140 Kennedy Drive Mr. spitz showed the area. It has been cleared and filled, but there is still a drain,if.eway through it. The Commission gave approval for the filling about 2 years a,{o and one stipulation at that time was that there be no building7 over the culvert. That has been observed here. The area is zoned R'l and the Zoning Uonrd gave apiroval for an office use last month. Yr. rt'oolery noted that the curb cut had not yet been closed, and that was a stipulation of the last approval. Mr. Poger noted that traffic reports indicated that the area was below level of service C in some cases and he onid that would hive to be considered. Mr. Ron Bouchard said they would share the access with the office building next door. The building will contain 12,Ou0 sq. ft. and be two stories; tall. They show 49 parking spnces. The lot is 2.1 acres with 305' of fronts::e. They propose parking spaces of 9' x 18'. The Planner has asked for sF;nces of 9' x 20' and the ordinance calls for 10' x 16'. Mr. Spitz said the practice of the Commission had been to require 9' x 20'. Mr. Poger felt the ordinance should be changed to agree with the practice. Mr. Bouchnr•d si+id the use would be 1,eneral office u3on. One person wants half the building and has 15 employt�es. :•:r. :spitz said his calculations showed 56, of the front area paved, which isa above the 50,,. maximum. lie also felt a need for 48 paarking :+paces. '1r, Bouchard noted that the plan had been changed a couple of times. There were discrepancies between Mr. bouchard's and '•'r. Lpitz' figures, and Yr. Poi;er noted that he was not sure which figures were accurate, so he felt this should be taken care of and the application considered again at another meeting. Mr. Woolery asked that there be extra plans for the members to look at. :fr. tioolery moved to continue the application of San lie.mo Realty Cor,)�)r-,ticn for site p1nn approval at 140 Kennf,dy Drive until two wf�nks from t(,nit-ht at City Hall at 7:30 pm. Mr. Mona seconded, and the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Levesque was concerned about drainage and how that would affect the church behind this land. DHS 4/7/81 STIPULATIONS For the Site Plan Application of San Remo Realty Corporation for a 12,000 square foot office building as depicted on a plan entitled "Proposed Office Building, 140 Kennedy Drive", dated March 31, 1981, prepared by Julian Goodrich, Architect: Stipulations: 1) Fill slope shall be graded and seeded. 2) Building roof drains must outlet at a location which does not erode the fill area. 3) A landscaping bond of $8,000 shall be provided. The administration may allow some credit for existing trees. 4) This site plan approval expires in 6 months. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 24, 1981 Proposed are 2 bedroom units, some flats and some townhouses. The existing house will be renovated. 40 parking spaces for the 20 units are proposed. Mr. Poger felt that access was in a bad place here and he said that multiplying; the 4 units on the land now by 5 in an area with a slope like that and with the traffic there did not seem like a good idea. Fie felt that, as far as safety, that area would not be able to handle 20 units, in his opinion. He felt that cars passed the site very fast, going either up or down the hill. Mr. Ewing asked about a common access with the property to the north and Mr. Spitz said he would look into it. Having the entrance to the property farther south, beyond the brook, was mentioned. This would be off the slope and farther from the major intersection. Mr. Ewing asked that that be checked into. Mr. Poger still felt 20 units was too many. Mr. Ewing felt the board needed a topo of the area. Mr. Poger suggested about 112 the number of units proposed. Mr. Spitz was not sure the access farther down the hill would be feasible. Application by San, Remo Renity Corporation for site plan approval of a 12,000 square foot office building at 140 Kennedy Drive Mr. Spitz showed the area. It has been cleared and filled, but there is still a drainageway through it. The Commission gave approval for the filling about 2 years ago and one stipulation at that time was that there be no building over the culvert. That has been observed here. The area is zoned R7 and the Zoning Board gave api;roval for an office use last month. Mr. r+oolery noted that the curb cut had not yet been closed, and that was a stipulation of the last approval. Mr. Poger noted that traffic reports indicated that the area was below level of service C in some cases and he said that would have to be considered. Mr. Ron Bouchard said they would share the access with the office building next door. The building will contain 12,Ou0 sq. ft. and be two stories tall. They show 49 parking spaces. The lot is 2.1 acres with 305' of frontage. They propose parking spaces of 9' x 18'. The Planner has asked for spaces of 14' x 20' and the ordinance calls for 10' x 161. Mr. Spitz said the practice of the Commission had been to require 9' x 201. Mr. Poger felt the ordinance should be changed to agree with the practice. Mr. Bouchard said the use would be general office uses. One person wants half the building and has 15 employees. Mr. Spitz said his calculations showed Wb' of the front area paved, which is above the 505,� maximum. He also felt a need for 48 parking spaces. Mr. Bouchard noted that the plan had been changed a couple of times. There were discrepancies between Mr. Bouchard's and Mr. Spitz' figures, and Mr. Poger noted that he was not sure which figures were accurate, so he felt this should be taken care of and the application considered again at another meeting. Mr. Woolery asked that there be extra plans for the members to look at. Hr. Woolery moved to continue the application of San Remo Realty Corporation for site plan approval at 140 Kennedy Drive until two weeks from tonight at City Hall at 7:30 pm. Mr. Mona seconded, and the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Levesque was concerned about drainage and how that would affect the church behind this land. Aim ©��ce ald l�f©Kd fir: �i, �m� Fi4 N&C GFIq <<f 700 Wt B ac©k v 8 a, �00 AA �� is 000ha 3��BC 0 0 o Mo u� utNluted on a plan entitled "Alterations and Additions, Cinema 1,2 and 3,"prepared by R.Z. Lamphere Corporation, dated March 2, 1981: Stipulations: 1) Landscaping in front of the building, as proposed in the recent Welby application, shall be relocated so as not to be directly in front of the new cinema entrance. 2) A landscaping bond of $1000 shall be provided. 3) A revised site plan containing information required from stip- ulation 1, shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Cc mission Fran: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: San Remo Realty, 140 Kennedy Drive Date: 3/20/81 1. Curb cut on Kennedy Drive near westerly edge of this property should be closed with a barrier curb. 2. The parking area along the west side of the building should have a storm drain inlet connected to manhole to prevent drainage over fill. 3. Fill slope should be graded and seeded. 4. Building roof drains must outlet at a location which will not erode fill area. Memorandum Next week's agenda items 3/20/81 Page 2 5) San Remo Realty, Kennedy Drive This site has a long history of review by local boards. Most recently, filling of the site was approved by the planning commission in 1979, and the zoning board granted a use variance for an office building last month. Most of the major previous stipulations are being met: access will be shared with the adjacent office building to the east, and no building will be constructed over the storm drainpipe. There was previous discussion about not allowiriy the parking area to be paved. However, this was not stipulated and the administration does not feel that restriction is necessary. This site plan is negligent in a number of small ways: (1) front property line and total acreage should be shown; (2) front yard green space appears less than the required 50%; (3) available parking spaces appear to be less than the standard of 1 per 250 square feet; (4) parking spaces should be at: least 9'x20' with a 20' aisle; (5) all internal walkways should be shown; and 46) landscaping information is incomplete and appears to be below the required dojlar amount. Although this is a use variance I have reviewed the size of the building in relation to the Cl traffic criteria. The proposed 12,000 GFA is ;Less than the permitted 19,700 GFA for a 2.1 acre lot. S NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUST14ENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance, decision of administrative officer. Property Owner .. 101) 617 : ,4 J-Z�,�,%o,<.ori�.�i Property location & description ,�,q,Sr Di �i�E..rdt�.tG � ,ZT.�,rs�c7ir.J� /riGsY p,c /So �E✓^'E,ay�,riv� Variance of Section G,Ob • ' ,' ez� vseEs e< g '- 7 Z>iST.er (number) (title of section) '6�1 Qe'y. 3 Basis of appeal I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (.15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and the hearing. Hearing Date Si� ,ture Appell nt .______________________________________________ -�_ ___________________. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on • , at (day of week) (month and date) following: y Appeal of , o seeking aL, from Section 4:�,00 (time) to consider the of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to ,e- '� .`.Q «� N Q PLEASE DIRECT ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: FORM NO. P-160 (REV. 9/79) TO Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator City Hall So. Burlington, VT 05401 pC (m* PIZZAGAIII CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 50JOY DRIVE/SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 802/658-4100 TELEX 954611 TRANSMITTAL 77922 DATE PROJECT NO. January 22, 1981 PROJECT X WE ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: UNDER SEPARATE COVER WE ARE SENDING THE FOLLOWING: COPIES NUMBER DESCRIPTION CODE 7 Kennedy Plaza Site Plan for San Remo Realty dated January 19, 1981 by The Site Concern I A FOR INITIAL APPROVAL H FOR APPROVAL B FOR FINAL APPROVAL I AS REQUESTED OR REQUIRED C APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION REQUIRED J FOR USE IN ERECTION D APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION NOT REQUIRED K LETTER FOLLOWS E DISAPPROVED - RESUBMIT L FOR FIELD CHECK F QUOTATION REQUESTED M FOR YOUR USE G APPROVED N O REMARKS: Lot contains 2.1 acres in total of which 1.2 acres consists of filled in area. cc By Michael Tomkowicz %5--VA/ Pee-Aoe-A '00� 40- X/ 72t 740a Z- L January 26, 1981 San Remo Realty Corporation Mr. Ronald Bouchard 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 140 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Bouchard: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a regular meeting at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Bocci, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, rebruary 9, 1981 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mo9 SOUTH BURLINGT Z NOTICE ZONING In OCCordance with the South Bur. Ilnpfon Zoning Regulations and CIIaPtlr 117, Tlfle 2� V.S.A. the South Burlington Zonlnp Boord of Adjust• men11 will hold o public hearing at. t South Burlington Municipal Of• fives, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, Burlington, Vermont on Monday Fe ruOry 9, 19BI, r 5:00 to consider the following: I. Appeal of South Burlington Realty COrpormlon, Douglas Schner seeking 0 variance, from 5actlon II.tKI, Dimensional requireme,li and t lion IJ e0 ON street perking of t South Burllnplon Regulations, n. Re- Quesf Is for Per lss10n to construct 0 SO' x 100' building 10 within fifty (50) teet of the rea ulred front yard and fifteen (I5) feet of the southerly side Yard . AISO reQuesfing Permission 10 set-off fourteen Porkinp spaces, which Is under the minimum re• Qulred at 80 San Remo Drive. 2. APPe01 Of South Burlington ReOify i Corporation, Douglas Schner seeking approval, under Section 8,10, condl- Sonal uses subsection 0.105 of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- Quest Is for perm lsslon to occupy on exilting bullding containing 5,000 souore feet 1 o retail/wholesale storage Dulldl ng. of 60 Son Remo J. APoeol of Edword B. Crane, Walter Adams agent, seeking a yore• once, from Section IJ.00, Nomcon. forming uses and structures of the South Burlington RlOulatlons. 'Re. Guest Is for Permission to construct on addition, containing 986 souore feet, sold dddillon will exceed Me density provision, Ot Brothers Two, 1341 Shelburne Rood. 4. Appeal Of Son Remo Realty Corpo- r0110n, Ronald Bouchard 5!lk100 a varlonce, from Section 6.00, per• So.,Mitluses sub section 6 00J of the South Burlington Regulations. Re. Quest Is for permission lO construct o Pr Ottlslonol office comPlex, contaln- Ing 10,000 SQuore feet On a lot cOn• tolnlnp 2.1 acres, located Of NO Ken- nedy Drive, Richard Ward, Zoning Adm1n1sir0flve Officer January 24, 1981 4/10/79 SSP SUGGESTED MOTION OF APPROVAL - San Remo Realt I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of San Remo Realty for a 1 lot subdivision at 140 Kennedy Drive, as depicted on a plan entitled "parcel 2... Site Improvements" drawn by D.J. Hamlin Consulting Engineers, dated 11/15/78, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Engineering shall conform to the memo of the City Engineer (3/22/79) or as otherwise approved by him. 2. Bonding for required improvements shall be posted in an amount as determined by the City Engineer. 3. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days. 4. No additional filling, beyond the limits shown on this plan, may take place without prior approval of the Commission. The filling shall be feathered on the north & west sides, in order to preserve the vegetation along the "woods road" and on the crest of the ridge to the west of the filled area. The finished grade of the fill will be the same as the existing drive opposite the telephone pole, at 150 Kennedy Drive. 5. This approval is based upon the following findings: (a) except for meeting a recording requirement, this property is a valid pre-existing lot, recorded as such in the City's tax records for some 8 years. (b) the amount of filling proposed is the minimum which will allow mamdaWE use of the property; no economic use of the property is feasible without filling, since two drainageways run through it. (c) the drainage traversing the lot is at least partically due to the City's construction of Kennedy Drive. (d) the filling proposed retains much of the existing vegetation on site. (e) from a fiscal standpoint, at least some development of a parcel fronting on a public thoroughfare should be all- owed. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, March 97 1979. at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following: Final plat application of San Remo Rgalt.�for subdivision approval of a 2.1 acre lot at 140 Kennedy Drive. The proposed lot is bounded on the south by Kennedy Drive, on the west by lands of Reilly Tire Company, on the north by lands of the Church of God, Inc., and on the east by lands of Kennedy Professional Associates. Copies of the application are -available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Sidney B. Poger Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission March 10, 1979 _ 2. PLANNING COD1MISSION APRIL 10, 1979 Mr. Levesque arrived at this point. Mr. Poger noted that the building could be built on the front of the lot but it was felt that such a proposal would have to be considered carefully and that it too might be denied as unfeasible. Fears were expressed on the subjects of erosion control, safe access to the building for tenants, and whether this was a reasonable request. It was also noted that any repairs to the sewer or water lines might make access to the building via the driveway impossible for an indefinite time. Mr. Levesque felt a good architect could design a home to fit in with the lot. Mr. Woolery moved to close the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Mr. Levesque and all except Mr. Poger voted yes. Mr. Draper then moved that the final plat application of Thomas Chastenay be denied. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion. Mir. Page said the Commission had not closed the door to any siting of a residence on the land, and said he would write up some findings of fact. The motion passed with Mr. Ewing voting no. Continue public hearing on final plat application of4 San demo Realty for a 1 lot subdivision at 140 Kennedy Drive Mr. Fred Johnston said they would use an erosion dike and 'some new filter fabric. They can go to a 4:1 slope instead of 3:1 if the city wishes and he said they would agree not to build over the pipes. Mr. Ewing asked who would be responsible for the culvert if there were damage to it after the building had been constructed but Mr. Page did not know. Mr. Johnston said he had talked to Rev. Stoddard from the Church of God and that he was satisfied with the plans. Mr. Page said that if the pipes were put in with an elbow, that would leave more room on the site for a building but Mr. Johnston said they would like to go with this plan and reapply if they felt an elbow would be better. There will be a 36" pipe put in under the church driveway. Mr. Poger felt the Comprehensive Plan called for protection of drainageways and that this would be a mistake and would go against the Plan. Nx. Ewing noted that the Zoning Ordinance prohibited building within 50' of the centerline of a minor stream. Mr. Page felt there were contradictory provisions in the ordinances and said the review the Commission was going through was the same kind the Zoning Board would go through in dealing with a conditional use variance request for filling. Mr. Johnston pointed out that there were two drainageways through the lot and that the one proposed for filling was not considered to be the major one. Mr. :Iona felt the real issue was the effect of the fill on the drainage that comes off this property. Mr. Page read the City Engineer's memo on this application and Mr. Johnston said they had no objections to it. Mr. Lowell Krassner felt the Commission had no grounds for allowing fill such as this in an area which was a wetland and contained a drainageway. He also remarked that he did not think it could be denied that if the area were filled and a building and parking lot were constructed, that would increase the amount of runoff in the area. He also said that to allow filling because that is all that is requested, without looking at what will happen after the fill is in, is blindfolding the city. He felt that traffic and drainage impacts on the area after a building is up on the lot should be considered by the Commission now. Xr. Page said the area was zoned R7 and had a CO district in it. Medical and dental offices are allowed in an R7 zone. Yx. Mona asked whether the Commission had the authority to stipulate that 3. PLANNING CONINIISSION APRIL 10, 1979 the parking lot for the building in the future be made of non -impervious material to allow for drainage and water absorption. It was determined that the Commission did have the power to so stipulate and Mr. Johnston said it would be feasible to use the filter cloth mentioned before plus gravel to make such a parking lot. Mr. Mona moved to close the public hearing. The motion, seconded by Mr. Ewing, passed unanimously. Mir. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of San Remo Realty for a 1 lot subdivision at 140 Kennedv Drive, as depicted on a plan entitled" 2... Site Improvements" drawn by D.J. Hamlin Consulting Engineers, dated 11 15 78, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Engineering shall conform to the memo of the City Engineer (3/22/79). 2. Bonding for required improvements shall be posted in an amount as determined by the City Engineer. 3. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days. The pipe shall be installed within 1 year or the approval shall expire. 4. No additional filling, beyond the limits shown on this plan, may take place without prior approval of the Co=ission. The filling shall be feathered on the north and west sides, in order to preserve the vegetation along the "woods road" and on the crest of the ridge to the west of the filled area. The finished grade of the fill will be the same as the existing drive opposite the telephone pole, at 150 Kennedy Drive. 5. This approval is based upon the following findings: a. except for meeting a recording requirement, this property is a valid pre-existing lot, recorded as such in the City's tax records for some 8 years. b. The amount of filling proposed is the minimum which will allow use of the property; no economic use of the property is feasible without filling, since two drainageways run through it. c. the drainage traversing the lot is at least partially due to the City's construction of Kennedy Drive. d. the filling proposed retains much of the existing vegetation on site. e. from a fiscal standpoint, at least some development of a parcel fronting on a public thoroughfare should be allowed. N,r. Draper seconded the motion. Mr. Mona moved to amend stipulation #1 to add "Any agreements between the applicant and the City Engineer shall be appended to this motion." Mr. Levesque seconded the motion and it passed with Mr. Ewing voting no. Be felt any changes should be shown on the plan. The motion passed with Messrs. Jacob, Poger, and Ewing voting no. Yr. Ewing stated that he felt this land was Conservation and Open Space as he read the Zoning Ordinance. Yr. Poger agreed and added that it contained a drainageway as well. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Stephen Page, Planner Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items Date 4/6/79 #2 Chastenav Subdivision Prior to the on site inspection Monday (4:30 P.M.), I will be meeting with a representative of the Soil Conservation Service to look at the property. Dick Spokes has no qualms about restrictions on the siting of buildings, where they are based on physical con- straints to,development (i.e. steep slopes, high potential for erosion, etc.) The revised plans show overhead power lines,for which a waiver is necessary. I see no reason to grant such a waiver. #3 San Remo Subdivision I have nothing to add. The on -site inspection is set for 5:30 P.M. Monday. #4 Treetops, Phase II_ The additional parking that was requested is being added. I will be meeting with the City's flood hazard consultant to confirm proper siting of the buildings. There is still an impasse between the City and developer regarding extension of the Phase I water line to the extreme west property line, although this is not strictly within the p�xview of the Commission's review for Phase II. �m #5 Lozon Final Plat The conditions of preliminary plat approval have been sub- stantially complied with. I feel there are no major unresolved issues at this point. #6 Ridgewood Phase III, Final Review This 114 unit project received preliminary approval in September 1974. Phase II (32 townhouses) and Phase II (35 townhouses) were given final approval in June 1975 and September 1977 respectively. Phase III, which is being presented for final review, consists of 35 townhouses and 12 single family lots. The plan submitted generally conforms to previous approvals (with the exception of the bikepath proposal). I suggest the following (also see WJS memo): MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Stephen Page, Planner Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items Date: March 22, 1979 #2 Chastenay Subdivision The information submitted to date is inadequate to make an informed decision, i.e., location of the electric service line (underground), proposed contours, type of fill, and erosion control measures. Substantial earthwork will be necessary on very steep, erodible (sandy soils) slopes to install water and power. The access proposed includes a 10% slope driveway of an indeterminant width - if this is blocked for any reason, visitors to the proposed dwelling will be inclined to enter across the Labounty property, where there is no legal access. (See WJS memo) There is adequate buildable area on this site. D v\ Lou�T�DN //\oP- CN��!-tdY sv8btv►b►o�1 #3 San Remo Realty Subdivision Tt-,o"—+ A It r - 4 00' With some minor modifications to the perimeter of the proposed filling, and provided WJS's recommen6ctions are complies With, I fine this plan acceptable. The intent of these changes is to insure that existing vegetation at the edge of the fill site is protected. In order to prevent the setting of an undesirable precedant, I will have findings, prepared for the meeting, to document the unique circumstances of this application. M E M 0 R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items Date: March 22, 1979 #2 Chastenay - Kirby Road Submittedplans show profile of proposed drive.However, we must have a typical section of what is to be constructed also proposed contours on how the side slopes are to be constructed. The fill was constructed to accommodate the sewer main that crosses the ravine. This was done about 12 years ago. Initially there was some difficulty maintaining the side slopes. Now there is a good growth along these slopes and they are stable. By adding fill to accomodate a drive, the filling must extend onto these aideslopes. This together with excavation for a water line and power line will most probably disturb these slopes and make them unstable. If a driveway is permitted�a method of intercepting the storm water and piping it to the drainageway must be included, also the responsibility for maintenance of this fill should be the responsibility of the owner. #3 `San Remo Realty Subd i i s iort 1. No structure will be built on top of the storm drainpipe. 2. The entire drainage system shall be built and a minimum of two feet of cover placed over pipe prior to construction of the fill. 3. A headwall or manufactured spillway shall be placed over end of pipe. 4. Pipe gauge shall be specified. 5. Only clean fill shall be used to construct the embankment. No trees, wood, or demolition waste shall be used as fill. 6. If filling is to be done on an as available basis, a gate or other method of access control shall be installed to discourage illegal dumping. 7. I would recommend that access to the site be via the existing curb opening to the existing office building. 8. I question the adgquacy of the 24' x 36" culvert at the church entrance road. 9. Method of erosion control shall be submittec. 10. Curb opening constructed under original subdivision shall be closed. n ADMINISTRATIVE CHECKLIST PROJECT NAME/FILE REFERENCE San Remo fealty Subdivision 1. LETTER OF NOTIFICATION & APPROVAL MOTION OR FINDINGS & ORDER 2. BONDING OR ESCROW AGREEMENTS LANDSCAPING SEWER WATER STORM DRAINAGE ROADS CURBS SIDEWALKS (NOTE ALL RELEASES OR AGREEMENT REVISIONS) 3. LIST APPROVALS GRANTED, WITH DATES, AND PERMITS GRANT INSPECTIONS COMPLETED, ETC.: 4. UTILITY EASE24ENTS RECORDED ACCEPTED *. BILLS OF SALE 5. CERTIFICATE OF TITLE x 6. ROADWAYS DEEDS FOR CITY STREETS ACCEPTED * PRIVATE ROAD & WAIVER AGREEMENT x & SITE A � � /.` 0 U : /l 7. FINAL PLAT OR RECORD COPY - STAMPED � SIGNED, & FILED OR RECORDED 8. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS ACCEPTED & RECORDED FILED 9. MISCELLANEOUS AGREEMENTS LAND FOR ROAD WIDENING OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DID ICAT ION FUTURE ACCESS POINTS SHARED ACCESS POINTS OTHER 10. COPY OF SURVEY TO ASSESSOR (IF CHANGE IN PROPERTY LINES) 11. FEES - PAID/DATE HEARING BUILDING PERMIT ENGINEERING INSP. SEWER RECREATION (RECORD CALCULATIONS AND DEPOSIT IN ACCOUNT) 12. IMPACT FOLLOW UP i.e., "ON LINE" EVALUATION: SCHOOL KIDS CAR COUNTS San Remo Realty Subdivision ZIz3�-q'1 The lot in question (parcel #20 on the attached map) is the remnant of a 3 lot subdivision originally approved in 1970. Failure to record the plat resulted in the Commission's reviewing the plan again in 1977. Any use of parcel #20 is predicated on the Commission's approval. I have conferred with Dick Spokes on the legal aspects of the filling proposed for this lot, the stipulations of the previous approval, interim zoning, and the provisions of the C-0 and R-7 districts in the prior zoning: the net result is an irreconcilable mess. We both concur that a pragmatic approach is warranted. I recommend the Commission approve a filling plan which will allow moderate use of the lot, will minimize erosion, and will retain substantial vegetation on site, for the following reasons: 1. this lot was pre-existing (save the recording technicality) . 2. the drainageway was largely a result of the City's construction of Kennedy Drive. 3. the drainageway traverses the lot :catty corner so that no reasonable use is possible without some filling. 4. expensive commercial road frontage should be fully utilized. 40 0 ti".~!.Xt� � .�/,J, �,� •'� rI�IL . 1��r.. ,.y ...;,..i.�,y l �;�' ,�,L,' �.G.r.� ..:, � � � � •+ ♦ � J' �. . r+w�-..,•r.. ..�.� ... ��.,.•.��. tw.. .J'.. 'J j,n,.u: i...•�..�.w�s..i.� ,•.~� .�• .�,�%ii �: �j•.�:�(•,r ...i�r Cy��! �i�'i' ,��fY�• i O � � �. .r ,. 47, If S211 'Aml t7x4 too' ,4o1 - '-- d dam// r-y O I ..L"4 �7 0 �1 - � ;,•���?,<<; Date Received By Date Applic6tion lmplet66and Received By I By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLIrATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIE°1 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) (Xmer of Record San Remo Realty Corporation 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05401 802/658-4100 (b) Applicant Same (c) Contact Person Ronald I. Bouchard 2) PROJECT ST.?LET ADDRESS 140 Kennedy Drive 3) PROPOSED USE Office Building 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., - of units, floor area, etc.) Rentable office space approximately 10,000 square feet 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 6) COST ESTIbSATES: (a) Buildings 300,000 (b) Landscaping 9,000 (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) _ 20,000 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE August 1, 1981 8) ESTII.IATM AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 50 9) P EAK HOURS) OF OP ERAT ION 8 10) P EP.K DAYS OF OP ERAT ION 5 March 9, 1981" DATE S IGNATU:ZE OF : APPLICANT Ronald I. Bouchard SAN REMO REALTY CORPORATION One of the Pixaagalli Companies 50 JOY DRIVE/SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 802/658-4100 March 18, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05401 Dear David: Per your request enclosed is a Site Plan with contours and gross floor area. Also included is an elevation showing the front of the building. If you need additional information, give me a call. Sincerely, d�- Ronald I. Bouchard Vice President RIB: j rb enclosure City of South Burlington " 1175 WILLISTON ROAD �__✓ SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 'a• —�', TEL. BG3 2891 March 11, 1981 Ronald Bouchard San Remo Realty Corporation 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT. 05401 Dear Ron: I have taken a preliminary look at the site plan for your proposed office building at 140 Kennedy Drive and have the following comments: It is confusi njr to have the contour -i nfnr,mnt; i on and p 1 rrrr on separate sheets. You should show directly on the site plt.ui th(, existing contours (after filling) and any contours that may be changed in connection with the proposed build.nfr, This w111 enable us to properly review building and p r.rklrrjr location and drttirrrij"o. You should also indicate the gross floor area (GFA) of the build- ing rather than rentable office space. GFA is the unit that we use in evaluating parking and traffic related requirements. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, :i i;j' - Lc:''irie: PLEASED I RECTALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: ...................................................................... ...................................................................... ...................................................................... 49:pC�e PIZZAGALLI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 50 JOY DRIVE/SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 802/658-4100 TELEX 954611 TRANSMITTAL FORM NO. P-160 (REV. 9/79) 78068 TO DATE PROJECT NO. Mr. David Spitz March 24, 1981 City Planner PROJECT City of South Burlington Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 X WE ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: UNDER SEPARATE COVER WE ARE SENDING THE FOLLOWING: COPIES NUMBER DESCRIPTION CODE 1Propospd Office RuildinR cinted Mqrrb 94,M rnn� A FOR INITIAL APPROVAL B FOR FINAL APPROVAL C APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION REQUIRED D APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION NOT REQUIRED E DISAPPROVED - RESUBMIT F QUOTATION REQUESTED G APPROVED N O REMARKS: H FOR APPROVAL I AS REQUESTED OR REQUIRED J FOR USE IN ERECTION K LETTER FOLLOWS L FOR FIELD CHECK M FOR YOUR USE CC R.. Ronald I. Bouchard, Vice President April 27, 1979 Mr. Ron Bouchard San Remo Realty 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Ron: This is to formally confirm the action of the South Burlington Planning Commission in approving your final plat application, at its meeting of April 10, 1979. The minutes of the meeting are en- closed, which specify the conditions of approval. This plan must be recorded prior to July 10, 1979. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Stephen Page, Planner SP/mcg 1 Encl PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hear- ing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, March 27, 1979, at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following: Final plot application of Thomas Chastenoy for subdivision approval of a 2 acre parcel at 114-116 Kirby Road. The proposed subdivision is bounded on the south by Kirby Road, on the west by lands of Cram, on the north by lands of City of South Bur- Iingtonand the LOBounty Construc- tion Company, and on the east by lands of Joseph Bilodeau and Janice Davis. Final plat application of San Remo Realty for subdivision approval of a 2.1 acre lot at 140 Kennedy Drive. The proposed lot is bounded on the south by Kennedy Drive, on the west by lands of Reilly Tire Company, on the north by lands of the Church of God, Inc., and on the east by lands of Kennedy Professional Associates. Copies of these applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington Citt, Hall. Sidney B. Poger Chartman South Burlingtnt Planning Cormission March 10, 1979 L4 Wllll� o rr rtst& � a',v 0 � & O—V Lee— Is . t-V -ter w, I1 P+�C:n �- �'b0A ('" `1, VC)L,. I-os �O San Remo Realty Subdivision -15� The lot in question (parcel ;�20 on the attached maD) is the remnant of a 3 lot subdivision originally approved in 1970. Failure to record the plat resulted in the Commission's reviewing the plan again in 1977. Any use of parcel #20 is predicated on the Commission's approval. I have conferred with Dick Spokes on the legal aspects of the filling proposed for this lot, the stipulations of the previous approval, interim zoning, and the provisions of the C-0 and R-7 districts in the prior zoning: the net result is an irreconcilable mess. We both concur that a pragmatic approach is warranted. I recommend. the Commission approve a filling; plan which will allow moderate use of the lot, will minimize erosion, and will retain substantial vegetation on site, for the following reasons: 1. this lot was pre-existing (save the recording technical►ty) . 2. the drainageway was largely a result of the City's construction of Kennedy Drive. 3. the drainageway traverses the lot catty corner so that no reasonable use is possible without some filling. 4. expensive commercial road frontage should be fully utilized. t 01,4 I,,�p F{t 71 CNNEOYio. � pP►3� �.P�ooC RTE5 Sl3 utu gt�3, 0 " �L Z t z� 8 p 0,20\.IIA MiZE QDwt.twINA. 'r a. '.�4'9: � -.:•�.►'!,,.�^fs?+•�+r�x;�.�#+il-.-�ma-'YtY•.` 1 STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS PERMIT APPLICATION NOTICE: This permit covers only rights vested in the State Transportation Agency over this highway and it does not release the petitioner from the requirements of any other statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations. This permit is effective upon compliance with such of these other requirements as are applicable. Permission is hereby requested by 9MW_ 117zU7 ... WX*r'P0AJ-- to perform the work described as follows, on the highway known as 116 Hayeqw- R-04 A in the Town (Towns) of -sa". EUXLTV-� Oet'O. ........ wo."-c ....... .......... .............. R5UN .Plfz the location of this work being. . ......... ... ... ........ ........ .................. ........... .... 11 .................. Description of the work to be performed (attach sketch) -fo TLC_ ok) -no_ . 'w'Q111X_ �Cgo� �� �! tw'� To ..... ... ... . . .............. .:5q576V--- hMOYLY T." too' .. ... ....... ................ .. . . . ..... .................. 0 10 ...... ..... .. .. .. ..... E Date work will begin .... .. 19. C% The undersigned, in consideration of the approval of this permit, having duly read all of the contents herein, expressly agrees to the directions and to the restrictions and conditions listed below d and printed on he reverse de this sheet. Witness P-�' Applicant Witness By � Address J)e&46&;T_ (Use for Joint Permit) Witness Co -Applicant V Witness By Address Permit Approval This permit is issued with the following directions, restrictions and conditions, and covers only the work described hereinafter, and then only when the work described is performed as directed, and subject to the following special conditions: Permission granted to carry out work as shown on sketch at the location described above., No. water..will.be -.pp- rmitte;l.to..run or to pond onto the highway..fr om the newly..Iandscaped..area.. . .......... ... .. . ................ ... ..... Dated at Essex Junction Work to be completed by: 19 This 18th day of May 19 78 ...... . S....J..­Gage .. .. .. ... Chief Engineer Byls C/C - L . � ...... _ .... ... )�istri E. Wood, Distri Transportation Wood, SEE OTHER SIDE FOR ADDITION rCO�NDMONS Administrator No work shall be done under this permit until the party or parties to whom it is granted shall have communicated with and received instructions from the District Highway Engineer at District 5 P.O. Box 1.68 Essex Junction. VT..05452 ...Phone; ... 655-1580 HD 210 5M 10-77 TIRE CORPORATION CORNER KENNEDY DRIVE & HINESBURG ROAD 9 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 • TEL: £� 1-0133 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT I Name of Applicant San Remo Realty II Name of Subdivision .T Kennedy Plaza III Indicate any changesito name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, sur- veyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application: San Remo Real 50 Jov Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Contact - Ronald I. Bouchard 658-4100 IV Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application V Attach a final plat drawing (originals not needed) showing the following information: (1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title, the name and address of the record owner and subdivider, the name, license number and seal of the licensed land surveyor, the boundaries of the subdivision and its general location in relation to existing streets or other land marks, scale (numerical and graphic), date and true north arrow. (2) Street names and lines, pedestrial ways, lots, reservations, easements, and areas to be dedicated to public use. (3) Sufficient data acceptable to the City Engineer to determine readily the location, bearing and length of every street line, lot line, boudary line and to reproduce such lines upon the ground. 1-Where applicable these should be tied to reference points previously established by the city. -2- (4) The length of all straight lines, the deflection angles, radii, length of curves and central angles of all curves, tangent distances and tangent bearings for each street. L (5) By property designation on such Plat, all public space for which offers of cession are made by the subdivider and those spaces title to .ahich is reserved by him. (6) Lots within the subdivision numbered in numerical orcer within blocks, and bloc?is le'ctered in alphabetical order. (7) The location of all of the i::,proveraents re- erred _o in Section 301.1A and in a6cition thereto the location of all utility poles, se -...age disposal systemis, rater supply Systems and rough craning ane other cevices and methods of draining the area affecting the subrivision.-� souk} n-,.n (8) Permanent reference monuments sho-.;-n thus: and lot corner -narhers shown thus: "O". (9) Construction drawings of all :_-equired i:irovenents. VI Znc'_ose supporting cocuments listed below or request that they be requirec as a condition of final plat approval: (1) Conies of proposed ceeds, agreements or other coctriants showing the manner in which open space, including park and recreational areas and school site areas, are to be dedicated, reserved and maintained and a certificate of the City Attorne-;, that these dociLments are satisfactory. (2) A certificate of the Cityzr_.ineer as to the satisfactory co::lpletion of all improvements required b-,, the Co :ti-nis sion, or, in lieu of any required L-aprovements not so completed, a performance bone -o secure completion of such improvements and their main-Cenance for a period of two years, and written evidence that the Citv Council is satisfied either with the bonding or surety company or with security furnished by the subdivider. i (3) A copy of such covenants or dead restrictions as are in- tended to cover all or part of the tract. (4) A prospectus describing the management organization if one is required. (5) In the case of a subdivision or development served by a privately owned and/or maintained street:. (a) a copy of all proposed deeds, agreements, or other m docuents which convey or relate to the use of a privately owned street or right--of-way, and a certi- fic-te of the City -Attorney that these documents are satisfactory. (b) -3- a completed contract between the lanao;mer and the city regarding the number of lots or dwelling units to be served by the proposed right-of-way or private street and the responsibility for the roadvay maint- enance, along with a certificate of the Ci---r %ttornev that the contract is satisfactory. y (si .azure) applicant or contact person cite PG /�� . z� Vz-f SQOAM-7 6DL-- CF--f 5� - ► tkxR�T -W +--TC- Zr-) CT- -IF cen Cylu VW- L'OF \v MI tom, 41� 4IG U4F- - P.. C. LA t!-�U c� c� \,\/41 t"!!�- do -- 6ccO�-6 -za ctI4 � `T-I-JEE . 4wr. I� �'"I" •' Y •./,`� ey is I♦ i :.- - PC- ��'�T C4KE� tSt 6CE7 D(= GD b �-�� T :rFXll� HE)-V '5EAWt3lF-