The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0110 Kennedy DriveTRAVELERS Date: April 04, 2008 CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN GTON 575 DORSET STREET BURLINGTON, VT 05403 CANCELLATION NOTICE RE: CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY INC. 45 SAN RENO DRIVEE SOUTH BURLIN GTON, VT 05403 Bond No. 104343675 Former Bond No. Type of Bond/Policy: Contracting- Compliance Local V 1, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America Hartford, CT 06183 Office at: 350 Granite St., BRAINTREE, MA 02184 License No. You are hereby notified that this Company elects to cancel the above captioned bond required by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN GTON This cancellation is to take effect on ,tune 15, 2008 , in accordance with the terms of said Bond or Policy. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America Attorney -in -Fact F-129-P (8/00) Rev. 2/05 Landscape BOND (License or Permit - Continuous) Bond No. 104343675 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE Champlain Oil Company, Inc., 45 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 05403, as Principal, and Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America, 1 Tower Road, Hartford, Connecticut , a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Connecticut and authorized to do business in the State of Connecticut, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of South Burlington, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403, as Obligee, in the penal sum of Eight Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100********* ($8,500.00******) Dollars, for the payment of which we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has obtained or is about to obtain a license or permit for Landscape work -Kennedy Drive, So Burlington VT 05403 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITIONS OF THIS OBLIGATION ARE SUCH, that if the Principal shall faithfully perform all duties and protect said Obligee from any damage caused by the Principal's non-compliance with or breach of any laws, statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations, pertaining to the license or permit issued, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. This bond shall become effective on June 15, 2005. PROVIDED, that regardless of the number of years this bond is in force, the Surety shall not be liable hereunder for a larger amount, in the aggregate, than the penal sum listed above. PROVIDED FURTHER, that the Surety may terminate its liability hereunder as to future acts of the Principal at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of such termination to the Obligee. SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 15t" Day of June, . Champlain Oil Company, Inc. 45 San Remo Drive, South Burlington Vermont 05403 By: �---, Principal Tra'v9iers Casualty & Surety Company of / merica, 1 Tow oad, Hartford, 1 Connec it Paul E. Plunkett, , Attorney -in -Fact S-2151A (2/00) TRAVELEF JASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF A- )ICA TRA . -PLERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY Hartford, Connecticut 06183-9062 POWER OF ATTORNEY AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY(S)-IN-FACT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut, and having their principal offices in the City of Hartford, County of Hartford, State of Connecticut, (hereinafter the "Companies") hath made, constituted and appointed, and do by these presents make, constitute and appoint: Scott Boardman, Paul Plunkett, Richard Smith, I. Munn Boardman, Michael Boardman, of Burlington / St. Albans / Stowe, Vermont, their true and lawful Attorneys) -in -Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign, execute and acknowledge, at any place within the United States, the following instrument(s): by his/her sole signature and act, any and all bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking and any and all consents incident thereto not exceeding the sum of FINE HUNDRED THOUSAND (S500, 000.00) DOLLARS per bond and to bind the Companies, thereby as fully and to the same extent as if the same were signed by the duly authorized officers of the Companies, and all the acts of said Attorney(s)-in-Fact, pursuant to the authority herein given, are hereby ratified and confirmed. This appointment is made under and by authority of the following Standing Resolutions of said Companies, which Resolutions are now in full force and effect: VOTED: That the Chairman, the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secretary may appoint Attorneys -in -Fact and Agents to act for and on behalf of the company and may give such appointee such authority as his or her certificate of authority may prescribe to sign with the Company's name and seal with the Company's seal bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking, and any of said officers or the Board of Directors at any time may remove any such appointee and revoke the power given him or her. VOTED: That the Chairman, the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President or any Vice President may delegate all or any part of the foregoing authority to one or more officers or employees of this Company, provided that each such delegation is in writing and a copy thereof is filed in the office of the Secretary. VOTED: That any bond, recognizance, contract of indemnity, or writing obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking shall be valid and binding upon the Company when (a) signed by the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President or any Vice President, any Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secretary and duly attested and sealed with the Company's seal by a Secretary or Assistant Secretary, or (b) duly executed (under seal, if required) by one or more Attorneys -in -Fact and Agents pursuant to the power prescribed in his or her certificate or their certificates of authority or by one or more Company officers pursuant to a written delegation of authority. This Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority is signed and sealed by facsimile (mechanical or printed) under and by authority of the following Standing Resolution voted by the Boards of Directors of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, which Resolution is now in full force and effect: VOTED: That the signature of each of the following officers: President, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any Assistant Vice President, any Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys -in -Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached. (05-04) limited $ amt. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY have caused this instrument to be signed by their Senior Vice President and their corporate seals to be hereto affixed this 17th day of November, 2004. STATE OF CONNECTICUT }SS. Hartford COUNTY OF HARTFORD S°�,p65UBt � Jp,�tY AND GASUq � ff3 . H ti Q HARTFORD, < 1 9 8 2O t COON O,t �� w CONN. 1 • V� �oa� n TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY By George W. Thompson Senior Vice President On this 17th day of November, 2004 before me personally came GEORGE W. THOMPSON to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he/she is Senior Vice President of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, the corporations described in and which executed the above instrument; that he/she knows the seals of said corporations; that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such corporate seals; and that he/she executed the said instrument on behalf of the corporations by authority of his/her office under the Standing Resolutions thereof. G.TET CERTIFICATE My commission expires June 30, 2006 Notary Public Marie C. Tetreault I, the undersigned, Senior Vice President of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, stock corporations of the State of Connecticut, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that the Standing Resolutions of the Boards of Directors, as set forth in the Certificate of Authority, are now in force. Signed and Sealed at the Home Office of the Company, in the City of Hartford, State of Connecticut. Dated this 15 th day of June , 20 05. \\,r muip4. .yr P ,lY A/y ASU �*yP p� 6 SUAfF JO S yG 1f OS�O�r� n 4� ! ARTFORD,j < 4 m HARTFORD, < Z 1 9 8 2 O x GOAJN. + CONN. ° + r w "INnIIIN `\t� �w By h� Peter Schwartz Senior Vice President State of Vermont WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT i LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 1, Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective January 1, 2005 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective April 25, 2005 Case Number: WW-4-2422 PIN: EJ96-0159 Landowner: C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington VT 05407 This permit affects property referenced in deeds recorded in Book 396 Pages 480-482 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of removing an existing gasoline service station for constructing a new building with a ten seat deli and 2 employees and three sets of gasoline pumps served by municipal water and wastewater services located at 110 Kennedy Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. GENERAL 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Department Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety— telephone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 879-2300, the Department of Health — telephone (802) 863-7221 and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: Sheet SP1 "Demolition Plan" dated 11/05/2004 last revised 4/19/05; Sheet SP2 "Site Plan" dated 11/05/2004 last revised 4/19/05; and Sheet D2 "Construction Details" dated 10/29/2004 last revised 4/21/05 prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. 3. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans in a manner that would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location or the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 4. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the pennittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The pennittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 5. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the water and wastewater disposal systems under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 64 — Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit. Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-2422 C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership Page 2 6. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. 7 A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction, and upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 8. No permit issued by the Secretary shall be valid for a substantially completed potable water supply and wastewater system until the Secretary receives a certification from a designer or the installer, signed and dated, that states: "I hereby certify that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply and wastewater system were installed in accordance with the permitted design and all permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfully met those performance tests." This shall include the water service and sanitary sewer lines to the structure. 9. The project is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 1,167 gallons of water per day. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of obtaining potable water without prior review and approval. 10. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by the construction of a connection to the municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 1,054 gallons of wastewater per day. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of wastewater disposal without prior review and approval. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on July 8, 2005. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Z�-vim--- Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer C For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety Department of Health — Food & Lodging Licenses AGENCY OF NATURAL. RESOURCES (ANR) AND NATURA' http://www.anr.stat )us/dec/ead/pa/index.htm / http://wm TOTAL # OF DEC PERMITS: RESPONSE DATE: DISTRICT: "ESOURCES BOARD te.vt.us/envboar C-C PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW: PENDING APPLICATION #: j ad •y TOWN: Sou Ur"L-,\ PIN Flo-0LS% PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: (Name) C°. D, a, r Trr{Jac irKs V4'.'Ck (Name) �p �. pzl Rom" (Address) D )c gl2o (Address) `- (Town) (State) (Zip) Sam ? r�� C'540*7- (Town) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) (Telephone) Project Name: µnb;) Based on a written or oral request or information provided by_S4,,r, e; received on &, is-vS: , a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of ) <+ to acres, located on 10 ca, ,O The project is `generally described as: f!�J , r�i„ d— -V6 �v I'r�L 91"- �% ID lb-ro-��'�"C�` �t�a ww�v5u�1I a.'. /.v� Prior permits from this office: PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ® 1 hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coordinator o sis t tri Coordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. ❑ Landow er/ nt [Permit Specialist ❑Other Person 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LANDOWNER/AGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V. S.A. Chapter 220). (#47) ** Project: X<ommercial ❑ Residential ❑ Municipal Has the landowner subdivided before? ❑ Yes ❑ No When/where: # of lots: AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: ❑ Yes �I Copies sent to Statutory Parties: ❑ Yes,Wo BASIS FOR DECISION: SIGNATURE: _ -, _ DATE: L-21 10SADDRESS: District #'Lj_ Environmental Commission District Coordinator Telephone: 111 West St. Essex Jct. Vt. 05452 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED?"® Yes ❑ No .Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit (#1 & #2)"' ❑ Notice of Permit Requirements (deferral language ) (#2) ❑ Floor Drains (#1.2) ❑ Campgrounds (#3) ❑ Extension of sewer lines (#5) REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: SIGNATURE: DATE: 6•d'0 ADDRESS: Dept. of Environmental Conservation Environmenta Akgement e Division, Permit Specialist Telephone: 802-879-5676 ❑ Wastewater MaDivision, Telephone: 802-879-5656 OVER »»»»»»» 'NOTE: NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES (#) REFER TO PERMIT INFORMATION SHEETS IN THE VERMONT PERMIT HANDBOOK http_//www.anr.state.vt.usldegZpermit hb/index htm IS A PRELIMINARY, NON-BINDIN ETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PEin IS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR rnMMFNrPMFNT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-41-3822) Contact: ❑ Discharge Permits: pretreatment; industrial, municipal (#7_1, 7_2, & 8) ❑Indirect Discharge Permits (#9 & 9_1) Residuals Management (#10) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888-520-4879) Contact: ❑ Construction/modification of source (#14) ❑ Open Burning (#18) ❑ Wood Chip Burners (>90 HP) (#14) ❑ Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation (#14) ❑ Industrial Process Air Emissions (#14) ❑ Diesel Engines (>450 bHP) (#14) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) (800-823-6500 in VT) Contact: ❑ New Hydrants (#22) ❑ >500' waterline construction (#22) ❑ Community Water System (CWS) ❑ Bottled Water (#20) ❑ Operating permit (#21) ❑ Transient Non -Community water system (TNC) (#21) ❑ Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water systems (NTNC). (#21) WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR STORMWATER PERMITS (Hotline 802-241-4320) (#6 — 6_5 ) 6 Contact: Contact: Stephanie Lanphear 802-241-4320 ❑ River Management (241-3770) ElPonds (#32.1) Construction General Permits >1AC of disturbance (#6.1) 241-3779 ❑ Shoreland Encroachment (241-3777) Steve Hanna (#28) �Stormwater from new development or redevelopment sites #( 6.2 & 6_3) ❑ Wetlands (241-3770) (#29) ❑ Multi -Sector General Permit (MSGP) industrial activities w/ SIC codes (#6.4) ❑ Stream Alteration / Section 401 Water Quality Certification / Stream Crossing Structures (751-0129 / 879""-5631 / 786-5906 (#27 & 32) 7 WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: rVton t��=t9 w ElHazardous Waste Handler site ID (241-3888) (#36) ElUnderground Storage Tank (241-3888) (#33) ❑ Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities drop off (241-3444) (#37,39,40) RAsbestos Disposal (241-3444) LR�Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) (#41 & 44) ❑ Composting Facilities (241-3444) (#43) [j Waste oil burning (241-3888) ❑ Waste transporter permit (#35)*Demolition waste 241-3477 ❑ Used septic system components/stone (#41) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: _ ❑ Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.) (241-3451) (#45) ❑ State -funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) (#46) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS & MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE (1.800-974-9559) Contact: Judy Mirro/John Daly RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: 10. FISH & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT (802-241-3700) ❑ Nongame & Natural Heritage Program (Threatened & Endangered Species) (#47.4) Contact : ❑ Stream Obstruction Approval (#47.5) •Q DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office Contact: IS -Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) (#49, 50, 50.1, 50.2) 7 SStorage of flammable liquids, explosives ❑ LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers #( 5D•2) ❑ Boilers and pressure vessels (#50.3) Q. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors (#51, 51.1, 52, 53, 53.1) ❑ Program for asbestos control & lead certification (#54, 55, 55.1) ❑ Children's camps ❑Hot Tub Installation & Inspection — Commercial (#51.1) 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: ❑ Child care facilities (1-800-649-2642 or 802-241-2159) (#57) ❑ Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) (#59) ❑ Nursing Homes (241-2345) (#59) ❑ Assisted Living and Therapeutic Community Residences (241-2345) (#59) AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) (#66) ❑ Junkyards (828-2053) (#62) ElSigns (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) (#63) El Railroad crossings (828 2710) (#64) ❑ Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) (#61) ❑ Airports and landing strips (828-2833) (#65) ❑ Construction within state highway right-of-way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) (#66) ❑ Motor vehicle dealer license (828-2067) (#68) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800-675-9873) Contact: ❑ Use/sale of Pesticides (828-3478) (#72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78) ❑ Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) (#81) ❑ Milk Processing Facilities (828-3428) (#83, 83.1, 85, 87) ❑ Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-2421) (##89, ❑ Golf Courses (828-3478) (#71) ❑ Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) (#88) ❑ Green Houses/Nurseries (828-3481) (#79) ❑ Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) (#75.1, 80, 16. VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 ❑ VT Building Energy Standards (#47.2) ? 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) ❑ Historic Buildings (#47.1 & 101.) ❑ Archeological Sites (#47.1.& 101) DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) jig -Liquor Licenses (#90) ❑ General Info (1-800-642-3134) SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) QT-Business Registration (#90.1) ❑ Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) (#90.2) QW DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551 & 828-5787) `Income & business taxes (sales, meals/ rooms, etc) (#91; 22, 23, 94, 95,-96) 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2070) ❑ Fuel Taxes; Commercial Vehicle (#69-70) LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael St., Ste. 205, Essex Jct., VT 05452 (802) 872-2893 (#97, 98, & 99) 24. OTHER: Sections #3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Date:,o_5l may be reached at 802-879-5676 Copies have been mailed to: Revised 2/05 Ul �C�llir�) 4 MANOR WOODS ASSOCIATION, INC P.O. BOX 9474 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. 05407 February 23, 2004 TO: City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. Development Review Board 5/v Planning & Zoning Staff RE: Sketch Plan Application #SD-03-76 To Whom It May Concern, At the February 3, 2004 Development Review Board meeting, Mr. John Mitchell advised the Board that Champlain Oil Co. representatives met with the Manor Woods Association Board to inform them of the proposed expansion plan. He further stated that the Association approved the plan. This letter is being sent to clarify that at the January 20'h meeting a Board Member stated MWA may not be prepared to send the City any letter of support for the proposal. There was no vote to support or approve the Champlain Oil Co. expansion of the neighboring Mobil Station. As a matter of fact, the MWA Board has many reservations about the feasibility of such a project in its "backyard". Thank you for your time in reviewing this letter and please feel free to contact any Board Member at the address listed above as well as to send notification about the next hearing dates concerning the Mobil expansion. Sincerely, w Eleanor Thomas - Owner of #2 Manor Woods, Board Member and Secretary of MWA, Inc. cc: John Mitchell, CO Co. Board Of Directors, MWA, Inc. Manager, MWA, Inc. Ir TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.O.Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com To: City of South Burlington Land Records LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: 3/21 /05 Proj. No.: 2003007 Attention: Re: Champlain Oil — Kennedy Drive Copies Date No. Description 1 Boundary Plat - Recordable 2 SP 2 - Recordable THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: REMARKS: Attached are recordable copies of the Boundary Plat and SP2 to be recorded in the land records as required for the Champlain Oil Co. — Kennedy Drive project COPY TO: File, Paul Wamsganz 03007LandRecord sT0l.doc SIGNED: ,Q If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. MEMO South Burlington Planning &Zoning To: Ray Belair, Brian Robertson File (Airport Mobil, Kennedy Drive Mobil) From: Juli Beth Hinds, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning RE: Traffic Overlay District Calculations Airport Mobil Station Proposal This memo reviews the trip end calculations to be used for the application of R. L. Vallee for the Airport Mobil Station owned currently by the O'Briens. This property is subject to the Traffic Overlay District (TOD) requirements. In summary, R.L. Vallee's proposed use of land use categories 853 and 933 is acceptable. The retail -to -retail multi -use reduction of 20%, derived from the ITE Trip Generation Handbook and proposed in the memorandum from RSG dated 24 February 2004, is not acceptable; the lack of correspondence between the proposed uses and the uses used to generate the 20% figure in the ITE book makes a multi -use reduction factor of 15% more appropriate. Based on this adjustment, the traffic information submitted, and a careful review of the land use categories used, staff has determined that the proposed project can be deemed to generate 113 PM peak hour trip ends, which is under the 115 PM peak hour trip ends currently generated by the property as a convenience store with gas pumps. Therefore the application as submitted to date meets the trip generation limits of the Traffic Overlay District for pre-existing uses. Trip Generation Analysis Options in the TOD Applicants have two options under the TOD regulations: Use the ITE trip generation rates for PM peak hour for the proposed uses and square footages; or substitute locally -derived data showing trip ends generated by different uses. Recently, the Kennedy Drive Mobil station owned by Champlain Oil Company received a land use permit using the latter method (locally -derived data from traffic counts at five comparable locations). R.L. Vallee has submitted an analysis using straight ITE generation data by pumps for the existing use, and by building square footage for the proposed use. Either approach is acceptable under the regulations. The question then becomes which use categories are used to derive the projected number of trip ends. Land Use Categories Chosen The memo dated 24 February 2004 regarding the Airport Mobil uses ITE land use category 853 (convenience market with gas pumps) and the number of fueling stations to characterize the existing use, which is acceptable to staff. MEMO South Burlington Planning &Zoning ITE land use categories 933 (Fast food restaurant, no drive through) and 853 (convenience market with gas pumps) based on building square footage, rather than the number of gas pumps, are used to characterize the proposed uses of the property, which is also acceptable to staff. The proposed project differs from the Champlain Oil -Kennedy Drive Mobil application in the use of land use category 945 (gasoline/service station with convenience mart) instead of 853. The proposed post -redevelopment function of the Kennedy Drive Mobil continued to be weighted towards gasoline sales as the predominant, visible, primary function of the property, with convenience market as a secondary (though enhanced) use. The square footage and design of the proposed Airport Mobil are clearly intended to greatly increase the convenience market as the more prominent, visible land use on the site. There is an observable contrast between the land uses and "feel" of the type of convenience use proposed by Champlain Oil and the type proposed by R.L. Vallee that makes this distinction appropriate as well. Use of ITE Handbook Multi -Use Reduction In the ITE Handbook there is a section with a multi -use reduction for properties that combine multiple complimentary land uses. Based on studies at a number of multi -use shopping centers, the ITE Handbook recommends a multi -use reduction rate (i.e. a rate of internal, pedestrian trips between uses that reduce the total number of trip -ends to the site) of 20%. While some number of trip ends may be absorbed by having the convenience store and a short-order restaurant on one property, particularly in this location where no similar uses are nearby, there is a substantive difference between this site and a multi -use shopping center of the nature used to generate the ITE Handbook rate. Therefore, on consultation with local traffic engineers, staff recommends applying a multi -use reduction rate of 15 % to the trip ends generated by the proposed project. No multi -use reduction rate should be applied for co -locating gas and convenience uses, since this is already reflected in the ITE generation rates. Conclusion Staff will recommend to the DRB that a figure of 115 trips be used as the not -to - exceed, existing number of trip ends for the Airport Mobil. Staff will recommend approving the methodology for arriving at a proposed number of trip ends of 113 as outlined above. dALIML WW MANOR WOODS ASSOCIATION, INC P.O. BOX 9474 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. 05407 February 24, 2005 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street Development Review Board Planning & Zoning Staff Attn: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator Re: SD - 05 - 02 Final Plat Application Dear Mr. Belair, As requested at the February I" Development Review Board meeting, MWA is submitting to your office, for the purpose of recording, the decision of The Board about the location of the 20 hemlock trees that are to be planted during the remodel of the adjacent property owned by Champlain Oil Co. The Manor Woods Board of Directors felt that there was no need for an actual meeting with the Landscaper / Designer and Champlain Oil Co. as the following decision was clearly unanimous. At MWA, Inc. regular scheduled Board meeting held on February 21, 2005, The Board voted unanimously to locate the 20 hemlock trees on Champlain Oil property for the purpose of equivalent screening of noise, lights and visual impacts of the new use of the Champlain Oil Co adjacent property. Also, as per the Final Plat Application meeting, it is Manor Woods understanding that the holes for the trees will be dug manually and no heavy equipment will be used. It is our desire that any heavy equipment not enter Manor Woods property. If you have any questions please direct them to The Board of Directors at the above address. A copy of this letter will be sent to Paul Wamsganz at Champlain Oil Co. For The Board of Directors, Eleanor Thomas, Vice -President MWA, Inc. Cc: Board of Directors Manager / file Paul Wamsganz; Champlain Oil Co. M CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 17, 2005 Paul Wamsganz Champlain Oil Company P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes — i10 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Wamsganz: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the February 1, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. � C_kaJqP1W 0, t �Ic DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 FEBRUARY 2005 Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-02 of Champlain Oil Co. for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 1775 sq. ft. convenience store and service station building, and 2) constructing a 2600 sq. ft. building with 2000 sq. ft. of convenience store use and 600 sq. ft. of short-order restaurant use with 20 seats maximum in conjunction with service station use consisting of four fuel pumps (eight fueling positions) and a 2200 sq. ft. canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Pietroski noted they received preliminary approval 6 weeks ago. Changes since that time include: 1. Coverage will match the existing conditions in the front yard 2. Landscaping will be provided between applicant's property and adjacent residential use. The applicant will infill with trees and work with neighbors as to location. 3. There will still be a fence. Mr. Pietroski showed the location. A resident asked why the additional trees are proposed on the residential property and not the applicant's property. The applicant expressed willingness to put them where they will do the most good. It will be the applicant's responsibility to maintain the trees. A resident asked when the trees will be planted. Mr. Pietroski estimated June. He added that there will be a 3-year bond on the trees so the applicant would have to replace any trees that die within that time. The chosen trees do well in shady areas. The applicant noted that in the motion it says the building will be now more than 30 feet high and will be no taller than now. He noted it is taller in some places, but in no place is it more than 30 feet tall. The question of the footpath between the applicant's property and the residential property was raised. The applicant indicated they will keep their portion of the path; if the neighbors want to close of their portion, that's up to them. Mr. Dinklage noted that at the last meeting, residents indicated they wanted to keep the path. Mr. Belair said this is not an issue for the Board as the portion of that path is on the adjacent property. Mr. Belair told the Board that his is willing to let the applicant bring in a plan showing the final placement of trees. The plan will have to be recorded within 90 days. A resident questioned the hours of operation. The applicant agreed there will be no change from the present (till 10 p.m., Monday -Saturday and to 9 p.m. on Sunday.). Mr. Boucher then moved that the Board approve Final Plat Application #SP-05-02 of Champlain Oil Co., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. "S CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DE, PAKI'MEN`Y OF PI.AI'srNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 3, 2005 Mr. Paul Wamsganz Champlain Oil Company P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Final Plat Application #SD-05-02 Dear Mr. Wamsganz: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board or) February 1, 2005 (effective 1/3/05). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 90 days (must be submitted by 5/4/05) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy M onough, Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BL7RLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX ('802) 846-4101 ,January 28, 2005 Paul Wamsganz Champlain Oil P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: 110 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Wamsganz: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, February 1, 2005 at 7.30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy M onough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: January 24, 2005 \drb\sub\champlain_oil\final.doc Plans received: January 5, 2005 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT— 110 KENNEDY DRIVE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-05-02 Agenda #13 Meeting Date: February 1, 2005 Owner Applicant C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership Champlain Oil Company, Inc. c/o Champlain Oil Company, Inc. PO Box 2126 PO Box 2126 S. Burlington, VT 05407 S. Burlington, VT 05407 En gineer/Designer Property Information Paul E. Wamsganz Tax Parcel 0970-00110-C Champlain Oil Company, Inc. Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial P.O. Box 2126 (R7-NC) District; Traffic Overlay District — Zone S. Burlington, VT 05407 5 District ± 0.9 Acres Location Map w w- 41 14 rF e W ,. * r xi ..ids ..w * pages Post-RO Fax Note 7671 Dat °Jc�► rn Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oikfinal.doc Champlain Oil Company, Inc., hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting final plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 1,775 square foot convenience store and service station building, and 2) constructing a 2,600 square foot building with 2.000 square feet of convenience store use and 600 square feet of short-order restaurant use with 20 seats maximum in conjunction with service station use consisting of four (4) fuel pumps (eight (8) fueling positions) and a 2,200 square foot canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive. The subject property contains approximately 0.9 acres and is located in the Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial (R7-NC) District and the Traffic Overlay — Zone 1 District. The South Burlington Development Review Board granted the applicant preliminary plat approval on December 21, 2004 (minutes enclosed). Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on January 5, 2005 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Requirements R7-NC Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 39,500 SF Max. Building Coverage 40% 6.1 % Max. Overall Coverage 70% _ 56% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 60 ft. Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a ♦ Min. Rear Setback 65 ft. 40 ft. 4 Max. Front Yard Coverage(s) 30% 45.9%; 45.4% 4 Max. Building Height 40 ft. 30 ft. �1 zoning compliance ♦ waiver required 4 zoning noncomliance Setbacks The proposed project meets the rear setback requirement for the R7-NC Zoning District, as outlined in Table C-2 of the Land Development Regulations, but does not meet the 65' setback requirement from a residential district boundary, as required pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(1) of the Land Development Regulations. The subject lot is triangular and has frontage on two (2) public street, therefore it does not have a rear yard. The front setback is violated by the existing canopy structure. Staff estimates the front yard setback at approximately 23'. However, the canopy will remain unchanged, so the setback encroachment will not be made worse by the proposed project. Pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(2) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board may permit new or expanded non-residential uses within the 65' setback, and may approve CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\final doc a modification of the width of the required setback and/or landscaped buffer. In doing so, the Development Review Board shall find that the proposed lighting, landscaping, and/or fencing to be provided adjacent to the boundary of the residential district will provide equivalent screening of the noise, light, and visual impact of the new non-residential use to that which would be provided by the standard setback and buffer requirements. However, in no case may the required side or rear setback be reduced below the standard requirement for the zoning district in which the non- residential use is located. The applicant has proposed to plant seven (7) Austrian Pines, twelve (12) White Cedars, and two (2) Canadian Hemlocks along the rear of the proposed building, which staff feels will provide sufficient screening to justify the encroachment into the standard 65' wide buffer. In addition, the applicant submitted a lighting point -by -point plan that indicates that the proposed lighting levels along the rear property line, adjacent to the existing residential neighborhood will be 0.0 foot candles. Front Yard Coverage Pursuant to Section 3.06(H) of the Land Development Regulations, no more than 30% of the required front setback shall be used for driveways and parking and the balance shall be suitably landscaped and maintained in good appearance. The plans indicate that the existing front yard coverage along Kennedy Drive is 45.4% and the existing front yard coverage along Hinesburg Road is 46.4%, both of which exceed the current limits as set forth in the Land Development Regulations. The plans indicate that the proposed front yard coverage along Kennedy Drive is remaining at 45.4% and the proposed front yard coverage along Hinesburg Road is decreasing to 45.9%. Traffic Overlay District — Zone 1 Pursuant to Section 10.02(G) of the Land Development Regulations, a property in Zone 1 of the Traffic Overlay District can generate up to 15 peak hour trip ends per 40,000 square feet of land area. The subject property contains approximately 39,500 square feet of land area. The subject property has an existing traffic budget of 146 P.M. peak -hour vehicle trip ends. The applicant has demonstrated to the City, through an amended traffic impact study, that the proposed project's estimated traffic generation will be within the 146 vte budget for the subject property (see enclosed). PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the Land Development Regulations the Development Review Board shall consider the following in its review of subdivision and Planned Unit Development (PUD) applications: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\final doc Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must obtain final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 1. Occupancy shall not take place in the proposed building until the applicant has obtained final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department_ The Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department, Jay Nadeau, reviewed the proposed plans and provided comments in a letter dated January 28, 2004 (attached). 2. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Water Department, as outlined in the letter from Jay Nadeau, dated January 28, 2005. 3. If needed, the applicant shall obtain wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to final approval. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the DRB may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 4. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burfington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. In making this finding the DRB may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. Access to the property will remain via one (1) 36' wide ingress and egress curb -cut off of Kennedy Drive, one (1) 20' wide ingress only curb -cut off of Kennedy Drive, and one (1) 36' wide ingress and egress curb -cut off of Hinesburg Road. Circulation appears to be sufficient within this site. At the meeting on December 16, 2003, the Development Review Board requested that the applicant explore the possibility, in conjunction with the Director of the South Burlington Public Works Department, of eliminating one (1) of the curb -cuts on Kennedy Drive. The applicant did contact the Public Works Department about this issue. In a memorandum dated January 8, 2004 (attached), Bruce Hoar, the Director of Pubic Works, stated that the design that the applicant has proposed for this site has been incorporated into the plans for the Kennedy Drive Project, and therefore design changes to the applicant's site plan are not warranted. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. In making this finding the DRB shall utilize the provisions of Article 12 of these Regulations related to wetlands and stream buffers, and may seek comment from the Natural Resources Committee with respect to the project's impact on natural resources. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING-I ON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\final doc There are no wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, or unique natural features on the site. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff believes the proposed development is in keeping with the goals for development within the Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial (R7-NC) District, as set forth in Section 4.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The South Burlington Fire Chief is in the process of reviewing the proposed plans. His comments should be available for the Development Review Board at the February 1, 2005 meeting. The Fire Chief has told staff that he does not anticipate any problems with the site plan, because the circulation will be very similar the existing conditions and the property has to accommodate large oil trucks on a regular basis. 5. The applicant shall comply with any requests of the South Burlington Fire Chief. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. The plans depict a 5' wide pedestrian path connecting the subject property to the property to the northwest. The City Engineer reviewed the plans for the proposed project and provided comments in a memorandum dated December 16, 2004 (attached). Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The City Engineer reviewed the plans for the proposed project and provided comments in a memorandum dated December 16, 2004. 6. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The applicant submitted a lighting point -by -point plan that is in compliance with Appendix A.9 and A.10 of the Land development Regulations. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING ) ON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\final doc The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the project is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Regulations for the R7-NC Zoning District. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement; and adequate parking areas. According to Table 13-1 of the Land Development Regulations, a service station with a convenience store requires ten (10) parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA), and short order restaurant requires twelve (12) parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. Thus, the proposed project will require twenty-eight (28) parking spaces. The plans currently depict twenty-nine (29) parking spaces. The proposed parking spaces are in conformance with Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. The plans depict a bicycle rack. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. There are parking spaces located in the front of the proposed building and on the sides of the proposed building. Staff feels the parking space layout is sufficient to meet this requirement. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. Staff feels the height and scale of the proposed building are compatible with the site and the existing buildings in the area. The height of the building will be approximately 30' and will not exceed the portion of the building that is already present. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING7ON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING ldrb\sub\chamglain oil\final doc Architectural details were submitted by the applicant and staff feels that this requirement is being met. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed project is located in the R7-NC Zoning District and related harmoniously to the existing buildings, roads, and terrain in the area. Staff feels the proposed building relates harmoniously to the site and the existing buildings in the area. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The subject property is a corner lot with frontage on two (2) public streets. It is abutted by a residential development to the northwest. Staff does not see it necessary to require any access or access easements to the abutting property. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans depict a dumpster for the subject property, which is adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements The applicant has stated that the proposed project will cost approximately $300,000. Pursuant to Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project has a minimum landscaping requirement of $8,500. The applicant is proposing $14,082 worth of landscaping. The applicant submitted an adequate landscape budget. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for nun -off. The plans depict adequate snow storage areas. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING70N 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\final.doc Lighting The applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the parking lot lighting fixtures, which are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. Other At the meeting on December 16, 2003, the Development Review Board asked the applicant to meet with the abutting neighbors in the Manner Woods Condominiums to make sure they were aware of the project and to address any of their major concerns at an early stage in the project. The applicant has stated that he met with the neighbors and that they did not have any major concerns to be addressed at this time. A representative from the Manner Woods Condominiums was at the meeting on February 3, 2004. It is staff's opinion that this was a sufficient effort to address the Development Review Board's request at this stage of the review process, as the abutting neighbors have been formerly invited to the preliminary and final plat hearings. 7. No exterior storage outside of the approved screened dumpster storage area shall be permitted. In addition, exterior product display shall not be permitted. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-05-02, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "comments" section of this document. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Paul Wamsganz, applicant SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 January 28, 2005 Trudell Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 RE: Champlain Oil Company South Burlington, VT Dear Sirs: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington Colchester Fire District #1, and the Village of Jericho, henceforth the "CWD Specification." Please add this note to future plans in visible locations. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with these specifications. 2. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the `Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection requirements. 3. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible if there will be a change in water demand for this property. As your project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department. 4. Based upon the allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 5. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, fiom the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees or shrubs shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20" of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. 6. Separation between the service line and sanitary and storm sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above referenced Specifications. 7. Future plans must indicate the service line size for the new building. Details must be provided for the service line and tap. Bury depth of the new service line shall be 6' to the top of the pipe. 8. The existing water service line shall be shut off, cut, and capped at the corporation on Hinesburg Road. The existing curb box shall be removed. Coordination with the South Burlington Public Works Department must be made in order to avoid conflict with future road and water line work in this area associated with the Kennedy Drive Project. 9. Prior to any building construction, the building contractor must contact this Department to discuss City requirements for meter sizing, meter settings, and backflow protection. 10. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 11. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 12. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 13. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay adeau Superintendent CC. Brian Robertson Doug Brent Bruce Hoar Enc. Allocation Application Plan Reviews: Champlain Oil- Hinesburg Rd. BILL SZYMANSKI, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 846-4io6 (phone) 846-4101(fax) COMMENTS Champlain Oil Co. Hinesburg Road — Kennedy Drive 12/16/04 Plans prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers dated 11-05-04 are acceptable. TRIP GENERA TION AND DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS FOR CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE AND SUBWAY RESTAURANT EXPANSION KENNEDY DRIVE AND HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT June 29, 2004 Prepared by: Abigail Lisius, EIT Jeremy Matosky, PE Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Williston, VT 05495 Preparedfor: Champlain Oil Company Attn: Paul Wamsganz P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05401 Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont Introduction On behalf of Champlain Oil Company, Trudell Consulting Engineers has prepared this Trip Generation and Distribution Analysis for the proposed reconstruction of the Mobil gas station and convenience store located on the corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The purpose of this report is to document existing traffic volumes, estimate the vehicle trips that will be generated as a result of the proposed project, and to analyze trip distribution with respect to the proposed site improvements. The procedures and methodologies used in this study are suggested in publications by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans). The project will consist of razing the existing 1,775 square foot gas service station / convenience store and construction of a new convenience store with a total building square footage of 3,250 square feet. The net result is an increase of 1,475 square feet of convenience store and deli -style (e.g. Subway) restaurant. The two existing service bays will be eliminated. There are currently four gasoline pumps (eight fueling positions) which will remain. No increase in the number or location of pumps is proposed. Background According to South Burlington regulations, the proposed project is within a Traffic Overlay District. The stated purpose of the Traffic Overlay District is to "reduce traffic conflicts and congestion by providing a performance -based approach to traffic and access management associated with development and re -development ofproperties in high traffic areas of the City... and to provide incentives to improve site design and access management during the development and redevelopmentprocess" 1. The PM Peak Hour between 4 pm and 6 pm is identified in the Ordinance as the time period for evaluation. Traffic Overlay Zones have been established within the districts based on their location in relation to the identified critical intersections or roadways. The proposed project falls within Traffic Overlay Zone 1, which consists of all lots within a specified distance from a major intersection (identified on the attached Overlay District Map). The intersection of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road is a major intersection within South Burlington. Kennedy Drive had an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) of 18,400 in 2002 and Hinesburg Road (VT 116) had an AADT of approximately 11,000 in 2002. The existing Mobil station is located on the northwest corner of this intersection. Currently, there is one access driveway located on Hinesburg Road, and two access driveways located on Kennedy Drive, as shown on the attached Site Plan. All three drives currently are unrestricted for entering, exiting, or turning maneuvers. Traffic volumes entering and exiting the project site were counted for a two week period using tube style automated traffic recorders at each of the three driveways from March 10 to March 24, 2004. The weekday peak hour volumes were averaged and, according to the count, 75 vehicles entered and 71 exited the site during the PM Peak hour (occurring between 4:30 and 5:30 PM), for a total of 146 vehicle trips. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, has a Land Use Code (LUC) 945 "Gasoline Station with Convenience Store" which most closely reflects the current land use. Based on the existing building square footage the ITE manual estimates 172 PM peak hour trips or approximately 15% more than the site specific count. Amendments to the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, South Burlington City Council, April 6, 2004 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Champlain Oil Cofnpunr Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont Trip Generation The proposed building will consist of 2,250 square feet of gas station/convenience store and 1,000 square feet of deli -type (e.g. Subway) restaurant. The current ITE Trip Generation Manual does not contain land use statistics for a gas station/convenience store with a deli -style restaurant. The zoning regulations state that the Development Review Board may approve or may require traffic generation estimates from sources other than the ITE Trip Generation Manual, including local traffic counts, if the ITE Trip Generation manual does not contain any data for a specified use, or sufficient data for a specified use. ITE also recommends that if a new land use not covered by the Trip Generation Manual exists, the analyst should collect local data and establish a local rate. There is an ITE Land Use Code 933 "Fast Food Restaurant without Drive -Through" that could presumably be used in combination with the Land Use LUC 945 "Gasoline Station with Convenience Store" to make a similar land use, but the data shows that only 4 studies have been completed for the fast food restaurant based on building square footage and only 1 study based on the number of seats. In addition, the square footage of the fast food restaurants ranged from 3000 to 5000 sq. ft, versus the proposed 1000 sq. ft. deli style restaurant. This method would not account for overlap between deli patrons and convenience store/gas station patrons, and result in an exaggeration of project generated traffic. To more accurately reflect the proposed project, a local trip generation rate was used to estimate project generated traffic. A trip generation study was performed between May 22 and May 30, 2004 at four similar sites within Chittenden County and one site in Windsor County. The following table shows the comparison between the five sites in the study. All of the sites listed in the study consist of a convenience store, fueling station, and a deli and are located on major roadways. Table 1: Trip Generation Study Sites Fueling Vehicle Trips'* AADT' on Major Location Positions Total Sq. Ft Deli Sq. Ft Peak In Peak Out Total Road (Year) Shell & Subway, VT Route 2A, Williston 4 2270 860 48 46 94 19,600 (2002) Colonial Mart, Susie Wilson Road, Essex 4 2400 400 79 73 152 19,300 (2001) Jiffy Mart, US Route 4, Quechee 4 2100 300 76 77 153 9,400 (2003) Ricks, Williston Road, South Burlington 8 1710 450 53 53 106 21,000 (2002) Beverage Mart, Route 15, Essex 8 2000 400 92 98 190 14,700 (2002) 'AADT = Annual Average Daily Traffic "Vehicle Tnps are for PM Peak Hour TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 2 Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont Table 1 shows that combination deli/convenience stores ranging from 1710 sq. ft. to 2400 sq. ft. see PM Peak Hour traffic ranging from 94 to 190 trips during the PM Peak Hour. The following is a graph of the total building square footage versus the number of vehicle trips generated during the PM Peak Hour. Also shown on the graph is a line and equation that represents the average trip generation rate for the five sites in the study. 300 o� 250 S Y !0 a 200 a w 150 a H m 100 v L d 50 0 1500 2000 Vehicle Trip Generation Vehicle Trips vs. Total Sq. Ft. 2500 Total Building Square Footage Figure l: Average Trip Generation Rate 3000 3500 y= 0.0143x+ 1 Using the average local rate, a total of 156 vehicle trips was calculated for the proposed 3,250 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store/ deli. As shown in Table 2 below, there will be an additional 10 vehicle trips at the site, which will be distributed, entering and exiting, between three different access points during the PM Peak Hour. Table 2: Project Generated Traffic Existing Trips I Proposed Trips I Additional I Trips PM Peak 1146 1 156 1 +10 Two of the deli sites were studied to determine the distribution of deli specific traffic. One of the sites is a very similar gas station/convenience store/ Subway restaurant located on VT 2A in Williston, VT, and the other is the Jiffy Mart on Route 4 in Quechee. The following table shows the noon hour (I IAM to 2PM) and afternoon/evening (3PM to 6PM) lunch counts taken at each location. These numbers do not correspond directly to vehicle trips, but are a count of the number of meals purchased during each time period. Table 3 shows that the majority of Subway or deli visits occur during the noon hour. Table 3: Subway/Deli Meal Counts Lunch Dinner Shell/Subway Williston 69 8 Jiffy Mart in Quechee 83 7 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 3 Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont Trip Distribution A turning movement count was performed on March 10 and 11, 2004 to determine traffic distribution patterns at the three Mobil entrances. Entrance A is the westernmost driveway on Kennedy Drive, Entrance B is the eastern Kennedy Drive entrance, and Entrance C is the Hinesburg Road entrance. Figure 2 below shows the existing trip distribution for the driveways. Four percent of the total traffic uses driveway B as an exit, most vehicles choose driveway A or C, likely because of driveway B's proximity to the Kennedy Drive/ Hinesburg Road intersection. Future Kennedy Drive improvements proposed by the City of Burlington will eliminate the "left out" and "left in" at driveway B. Eliminating the "right out" at this driveway will add a minimal amount of traffic to the other two driveways. Figure 3 shows the trip distribution estimate after the driveway improvements. See "Site Improvements" section for a detailed description of the Proposed reconfiguration. * N Hinesburg ISite 13 Road 19 A 17 7 4'.13"LL 8 4J " _J 2�_t t9 —? 3 19 Pigure 2: -Existing Traffic Distribution - PM Peak Hour Figure 3: Existing Trips with Driveway Improvements It is estimated that an additional 10 vehicle trips will be distributed across the three access points as a result of the proposed project. Vehicle trip distribution is based on existing vehicle patterns observed on the site. Figure 4 below shows the project generated vehicle trip distribution for the PM peak hour. Figure 5 illustrates total site traffic and vehicle distribution during the PM peak hour after the project is complete. Figure 4: Project Generated Trip Distribution ♦ Hinesburg ISite 14 Road N 20 24� 122 'A" 9 "B" Ll 9 41, 4H t- 27 _J 1 10 20 Kennedy Drive Figure S: Total Site Traffic - PMPeak Hour TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 4 Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont Site Improvements South Burlington Regulations state that "The DRB may allow adjustments to the project's traffic generation or may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the standards set forth for a lot in a traffic overlay zone if the DRB determines that other .site improvements with respect to improved access management, internal circulation, connections between adjacent properties, and improved pedestrian access, will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the immediate vicinity of the project." Several site improvements will be constructed along with the proposed project in an. effort to improve access management, internal circulation, connections between adjacent properties, and also improve pedestrian access. The following is an excerpt from the City of South Burlington Regulations, Section 10.02(H),2, that discusses the standards for adjustments to a project's traffic generation calculation or to a site's traffic budget, and an explanation of how the proposed driveway improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow. In making its determination of whether other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow, the DRB may consider thefollowing: a) change or reduction in the number and location of curb cuts The location of one of the curb cuts — "Driveway A" will change. The driveway will be relocated seven (7) feet to the west of its current position, which is farther away from the Kennedy Drive/ Hinesburg Road intersection. Increased separation between the access and the intersection is beneficial in terms of safety, access management, and traffic flow. b) creation of secondary access points within lots sufficient for two-way, year-round vehicular and pedestrian movements that provide for suitable internal circulation between properties. A secondary access point is proposed that will allow for two-way, year-round pedestrian movements that will provide for suitable internal circulation between the Mobil station property and the residential development that neighbors to the west. A 6-foot wide paved pathway will be constructed from the western corner of the proposed building to the western property line to allow pedestrian access to the adjacent development. c) The elimination of left turns or through movements across an arterial through the creation of raised medians There will be a raised median installed on the western leg of the Kennedy Drive/ Hinesburg Road intersection as a result of the proposed Kennedy Drive Reconstruction by the City of South Burlington. This raised median will eliminate all left turns into and out of "Driveway B", which is the closest driveway to the intersection. d) Reductions in the width of curb cuts or access points or their definition in a manner that substantially improves the definition of turning and traffic movements into and out of the property, and to a width no greater than the specified maximum width for the applicable type of the driveway in Figure 15-1 of these regulations The width of the curb cut at Driveway B will be reduced from 35 to 20 feet. This driveway will also be reconfigured to allow only vehicles turning right into the site. Right turns out of the site, and left turns into and out of the site will be eliminated at this driveway. This will substantially improve the definition of turning and traffic movements into and out of the property. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 5 Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont e) The relocation of access points farther away from the high -volume intersections As stated above, Driveway A will be relocated further away from the high -volume intersection of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road. The attached Existing Site Plan and Preliminary Site Plan, show the existing driveways on the site and the proposed driveway confi<_-uration, respectively. f) The impact of the proposal on the overall traffic volumes and levels of service at intersections in the immediate vicinity of the project. The increase in traffic during the PM peak hour is limited to approximately 10 vehicles entering and exiting the site across three entrance drives. The effect on the level of service at the Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive intersection is negligible (10 new trips versus +/- 3,000 per hour existing) and does not warrant a complete intersection level of service analysis. g) Any other criteria contained within the PUD review or other factors as the Development Review Board deems relevant, subject to consultation with and approval by the Director of Public Works. Conclusion Based on the results of the review and analysis of the existing and projected traffic conditions in the area of the site, the following conclusions are presented. ❑ Based on site specific traffic volume counts, the existing site traffic is 15% less than predicted by the ITE Trip Generation Manual for similar land uses. The actual number of average PM peak hour trips is 146 vehicles entering and exiting. ❑ The project is expected to generate approximately 10 additional vehicles (a 6.9% increase) entering and exiting the site during the afternoon (PM) peak hour, occurring between 4:30 and 5:30 PM based on local data obtained in Vermont at similar facilities. Local trip generation rates were used because ITE did not have applicable data to estimate vehicle traffic from a gas station/ convenience store/ deli -style restaurant, as recommended by both ITE and the South Burlington zoning. ❑ It is estimated that the majority of trips generated by the deli -style restaurant (e.g. Subway) will occur during the noon peak hour, based on the existing number of deli patrons and the nature of the sandwich business documented at similar facilities. The proposed project will not create significant traffic increases during the AM or PM peak hours. The site and adjacent roadways have adequate capacity to handle the estimated increase in trips. ❑ Based on the relatively small increase (=L6.9%) of project generated PM peak hour trips, the trip distribution between three access points, and the time of day the majority of the additional trips will occur, traffic circulation between the site and the street network will continue to operate in a safe and efficient manner. ❑ The proposed project is in conformance with the South Burlington Land Development Regulations and the Traffic Overlay District. Several improvements are being proposed to improve site circulation, efficiency, safety, and access management. The result is a net benefit with respect to traffic flow within the site and at the access points on Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 6 N South Burlington, Vermont *F Overlay Districts Map S Town Boundary // Roads Airport Approach Boundary Traffic Overlay District Balance of Restricted Roads - Zone 5 High Volume Roadway Segment - Zones 2,3, & 4 Major Intersections - Zone 1 ty Center Design Review Overlay Districts DESIGN DISTRICT 1 DESIGN DISTRICT 2 PZZq DESIGN DISTRICT 3 Floodplain Overlay 100 Yr. Roodplain Scenic View Protection Overlay Districts DORSET PARK HINESBURG RD. - NORTH HINESBURG RD. - SOUTH SPEAR ST. - ALLEN RD. SPEAR ST. - OVERLOOK PARK SPEAR ST. - RIDGE 0 Bartlett Brook Overlay District ZONE D / l WZONE E Cr RZONEB Sources: View protection zone, Bartlett Brook watershed boundary, and airpert approach cones drafted onto 1:5000 1988 orlhophotos. Floodplain maps transferred to Vermont state plane coordinate system. Produced by the City of South Burlington. February 14, 2001. Disclaimer. The accuracy of information presented is determined by its sources: errors and omissions may exist. The City of South Burlington is not responsible for these. Questions of on the ground location can only be resolved by site inspections, and/or surveys by registered surveyor. Hence this map is not sufficient for delineation of features on the ground. Thic map ident'rfim the presonce of features, and may indicate relationships between features, but is not a replacement for surveyed information or engineering studies. a 6 i s _ —� —~--,_ __ ----_ _ I _ _ __ -_ \�__— %' 11�-- ., Mobil South Burlington, VT WeekdayKennedy Drive & Hinesburg Road ..m�mmmmm�m000 �� mmmmmm©mm000 ®�m�mmmm��m�oo mom©m��m000 - mmmmmm�mm000 „' mm�mmm�mm000 �mm�mmm�©moon m�mmm��moo© NEW mmmm©ammo , , ��mmmmmm�mm000 ul1 mmmmmmmmm000 .. mmmmmmmmm000 11 mmmmmmmmm000 mmmmmmmmm000 mmmmmmm • m000 „' mmmmmmmmm000 ��mmmmmmm©moo© 1 mmmmmm�mm000 • ©©mmm©■�©moom 6:45 AM 4 5 9 3 2 5 5 6 11 12 13 25 AM Peak Hour 7:00 AM 5 8 13 5 2 7 6 7 13 16 17 33 In Out Total 7:15 AM 4 5 9 5 2 7 5 6 11 14 13 27 61 60 121 7:30 AM 6 7 13 4 3 7 6 7 13 16 17 33 7:45 AM 6 7 13 4 1 5 6 9 15 16 17 33 8:00 AM 5 4 9 4 3 71 61 61 121 15 1 13 28 0-.l 3 HNI I / b 1 l .i b I 'JI 5 41 6 1Uj 17 1 15 32 8:30 AM 7 6 13 6 31 9 51 7 12 18 16 34 8:45 AM 5 9 14 5 31 8 6 8 14 16 20 36 9:00 AM 5 5 10 5 3 8 6 8 14 16 16 32 9:15AM 6 5 11 4 3 7 6 7 13 16 15 31 9:30 AM 5 5 10 5 2 7 5 5 10 15 12 27 9:45 AM 4 6 10 5 2 7 4 9 131 13 1 17 30 10:00 AM 4 4 8 5 2 7 5 6 11 14 12 26 10:15 AM 5 4 9 4 2 6 5 5 10 14 11 25 10:30 AM 4 5 9 5 2 7 4 7 11 13 14 27 10:45 AM 5 7 12 3 2 5 5 7 12 13 16 29 11:00 AMI 5 4 9 5 2 7 4 6 10 14 12 26 1 of 2 11:15 AM 4 51 9 4 21 6 41 7 11 12 1 14 26 11:30 AM 5 41 9 4 31 7 4 6 10 13 13 26 11:45 AM 6 6 12 4 21 6 5 6 11 15 14 29 12:00 PM 7 71 14 5 21 7 9 9 18 21 1 18 39 7 8 15 4 1 5 6 9 15 17 18 35 7 10 17 5 3 8 7 8 15 19 21 40 A 7 6 13 5 2 7 7 8 15 19 16 35 7 6 13 6 4 10 7 7 14 20 17 37 4 5 9 3 21 5 6 7 13 13 14 27 1:30 PM 7 7 14 5 2 7 8 8 16 20 17 37 1:45 PM 7 6 13 5 3 8 5 7 12 17 16 33 2:00 PM 6 6 12 6 2 8 6 8 14 18 16 34 2:15 PM 8 6 14 5 3 8 6 10 16 19 19 38 2:30 PM 5 6 11 6 -6.-4.-10 2 8 7 10 17 18 18 36 2:45 PM 6 6 12 8 10 18 20 20 40 100 PM 7 6 13 5 2 7 5 8 13 17 16 33 3:15 PM 7 6 13 5 3 8 7 9 16 19 18 37 3:30 PM 5 7 12 8 31 11 5 9 14 18 19 37 . 1 3:45 PM 71 7 14 8. ? 1 5 q lal gn 1R '29 4:00 PM 7 6 13 6 3 9 7j 10 17 20 1 19 39 PM Peak Hour 4:15 PM 5 6 11 7 2 9 5 9 14 17 17 34 In Out I Total 4:30 PM 7 5 12 7 3 10 7 8 15 21 16 37 75 71 146 4:45 PM 4 7 11 6 1 7 6 10 16 16 18 34 5:00 PM 6 5 11 7 3 10 6 10 16 19 18 37 5:15 PM 5 6 11 8 3 11 6 10 16 19 19 38 .J.JV rrvi i -+I zil i z I y )I t5 I I 1 14 31 5:45 PM 6 51 11 5 31 8 71 9 16 18 17 35 6:00 PM 3 4 7 5 21 7 5 7 12 13 13 26 6:15 PM 4 3 7 4 21 5 7 12 13 12 25 6:30 PM 5 4 9 4 1 5 5 5 10 14 10 24 6:45 PM 3 2 5 4 2 6 4 5 9 11 9 20 7:00 PM 5 2 7 5 11 6 3 4 7 13 1 7 20 7:15PM 2 2 4 2 21 4 3 5 8 7 1 9 16 7:30 PM 4 3 7 2 11 3 3 4 7 9 1 8 17 7:45 PM 4 3 7 2 21 4 4 4 8 10 1 9 19 8:00 PM 3 2 5 3 11 4 4 4 8 10 7 17 8:15PM 2 1 3 3 1 4 3 3 6 8 5 13 8:30 PM 2 3 5 2 21 4 2 3 5 6 8 14 8:45 PM 2 2 4 1 11 2 3 3 6 6 6 12 9:00 PM 2 2 4 3 11 4 2 3 5 7 1 6 13 915PM 2 3 5 1 11 22 4 61 5 1 8 13 9:30 PM 2 2 4 1 01 1 2 2 4 5 4 9 9A5 PM 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 3 4 7 10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 10:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15PM 0 0 0 01 01 0 OT 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 PM 0 OF-0 01 ol 0 ol 0 0 0 0 11:45 PMJ 01 01 01 01 01 ol 01 0 0 0 0 0 2of2 Intersection Kennedy Drive and Mobil Entrance Date 3/10/2004 Counter AAL Regular Street Name Kenna tl Drive —Eastbound Ken ned Drive --Westbound Mobil Entrance--Norihbound Mobil Entrance--Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thm Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 7 193 1 0 180 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 4:15 PM 3 176 0 0 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 5 189 0 0 152 3 0 0 0 1 0 4 4:45 PM 4 180 0 0 201 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 8 5.00 PM 12 241 0 0 210 5 0 0 0 1 0 4 5:15 PM 4 197 0 01 198 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 530 PM 2 184 0 0 164 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 5:45 PM 2 163 0 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 1fi Total I Heaw Vehicles 26 4% 825 7w 0 I 0 1 772 10 0 1 0 0 8 0 1 19 Heaw Vehicle. Street Name Start Time 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5.45 PM Kennetl Left 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Drive —Eastbound Thru 1 10 10 4 3 7 4 2 4 Ri M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kennedy Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drive --Westbound Thru 1 2 3 4 4 0 3 2 4 R' ht 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Mobil Entrance Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --Northbound Thru 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mobil Entrance--Southbound Left 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ri ht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _0 __0 Peak Hour HV Tot. 1 18 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 r)n v R Street Name Kenna d Drive —Eastbound Ken edy Drive --Westbound Mobil Entrance --Northbound Mobil Entrance--Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 2 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 2 4:15 PM 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 PM 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 p 1 5:15 PM 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 _0 _0 0 0 Total 4 0 0 1 0 0 23 1 0 01 0 2 0 5 TOTAL 402 386 361 403 480 416 359 368 Intersection Hinesburg Road and Mobil Entrance Date 3/112004 Counter RPO P.—,— Street Mobil Entrance --Eastbound Business -Westbound Hineslo Road --Northbound Hinesbur Road--Southbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lek Thru R ht 0 PM 2 0 4 0 1 2 2 111 4 u 103 2 5 PM 2 1 5 7 1 1 3 95 0 0 99 1 4:30 PM 3 0 6 3 0 4 1 336 3 0 90 4 4:45 PM 5 0 4 5 1 1 2 99 1 0 117 1 5:00 PM 4 0 4 1 0 3 3 143 2 0 105 5 5:15 PM 7 0 10 1 0 2 3 224 0 0 132 6 5:30 PM 5 0 7 2 0 0 4 77 0 1 93 4 5:45 PM 3 1 8 0 0 2 3 112 0 p 92 6 Total 20 0 24 10 1 10 9 507 6 0 449 16 %Heavy Vehicles 5% 1% 1% Tnu-4c Street Name Total 20 0 24 10 1 10 9 507 6 0 449 16 %Heavy Vehicles 5% 1% 1% Tnu-4c Street Name Mobil Entrance --Eastbound Business --Westbound Hmesbu Road --Northbound Hinest) Road—Southbound Start Time Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thry Ri ht 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 f 0 4:30 PM 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 p 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 I0 3 0 5:00 PM 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Ip 1 p Total Heavy Veh's 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 rOTAL 233 218 253 241 272 286 193 228 Y TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) December 16, 2005 Ray Belair Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Kennedy Drive Traffic Dear Ray: tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com This letter is in response to your request for documentation to show that the estimated vehicle trip generation for the proposed addition of a sandwich shop to the existing gas station and convenience store will not result in a net increase. The existing number of vehicles entering and exiting the site during the PM peak hour is 146. We have prepared the following calculation of what the building square footage would be required to match the vehicle trip generation (mathematically) for the proposed Kennedy Drive convenience store/deli with the existing levels. In the report TRIP GENERA TIONAND DISTRIBUTIONANALYSIS dated June 29, 2004, several properties with the same land use (gas station/convenience/deli) were studied to determine a trip generation rate for the combination gas station, convenience store, and deli because the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, does not have a similar land use category. Based on the sites studied, we derived a regression formula which predicts traffic as it relates to building square footage (as required by South Burlington Zoning Regulations) for the proposed use: # of vehicle trips = (0.0143 x Square Feet of Store) + 109 Originally, Champlain Oil had proposed a 3,250 square foot store, which we calculated would generate 156 total trips, or 10 new trips, based on the regression formula. Using the same equation, if square footage is solved for using the existing number of vehicle trips, 146, the new store should be 2,600 square feet to result in no net increase in traffic. P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting If you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) At�-J LLAA---� Abigail A Lisius Project Engineer cc. Paul Wamsganz 03007BelairL02.doc PLANT LIST Champlain Oil Company Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 114105 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT* TOTAL Chaenomeles Dwarf Red Quince 21 2 gal. $40.00 $840.00 speciosa' Texas Scarlet' Cornus sericea Compact Kelsey 22 3 gal. $40.00 $880.00 'Kelseyi' Dogwood Euonymus fortunei Silver Edge 28 3 gal. $45.00 $1,260.00 'Silver Edge' Wingercreeper Juniperus chinensis Compact Pfitzer Juniper 20 5 gal. $45.00 $900.00 pfitzeriana compacta Juniperus chinensis Seagreen Juniper 13 5 gal. $55.00 $715.00 seagreen Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 7 5-6' $237.50 $1,662.50 Potentilla fruiticosa Goldstar Cinquefoil 18 3 gal. $37.50 $675.00 'Goldstar' Quercus rubra Red Oak 1 21/2"-3" $575.00 $575.00 Thuja occidentalis Dk. Am. Arborvitae 12 4'-5' $80.00 $960.00 nigra Tsuga canadensis Canadian Hemlock 22 5' - 6' $225.00 $4,950.00 Weigela floribunda Tango Weigela 19 2 gal. $35.00 $665.00 'Tango" TOTAL $14,082.50 " The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. i 6" EXTENDED POLE MOUNT 12" (305 mm) AREA CUTOFF FLOOD Ballast —7 Capacitor Ignitor -- (Where raquired) j— G (152 mm)� r i i i i Cord — 24'(610 mm) long i Extended Pole Mount Finish cola: bronze PULSE START METAL HALIDE SPEC_# 125W PSMH MAC2612-(a)(b) Q SPEC# 150W PSMH MAC26154a)(h) - -.. METAL HALIDE Q SPEC 5OW MH MAC2405- [� SPEC# 70W MH MAC2407- SPEC# 100W MH MAC2410- SPEC # 175W MH MAC2417- HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM SPEC # 35W HPS MAC2503- SPEC 5OW HPS MAC2505- 0 SPEC 70W HPS MAC2507- 0 SPEC# 10OW HPS _ MAC2510- 0 --. SPrc 150W HPS — MAC2515- <I)(b) — Speedy :+, voltage & ::i, Options. Housing Reflector Seamless, Specular hammedone wrapper die-cast aluminum with semi-specular sides Finish cola: bronze / ❑ 12" (305 mm)� - —{ 60' forward throw sharp cutoff luminaire for HID lamp, totally enclosed. Housing is seamless, die-cast aluminum. Mounting consists of a 1.8" (44 mm) wide by 2.5" (64 mm) high by 6" (152 mm) long extruded aluminum arm. The arm is held in place with two 3/8" (9 mm) mounting rods fastened to a steel backing plate inside the pole, and by two nuts inside the fixture housing. Mounting rods are provided with sealing washers to prevent water leakage. Lens assembly consists of rigid aluminum frame and high -impact, clear -tempered glass. l.emp — —(Included) 5" (127 mm) — Lampholder Ballast Compartment -- - Lens Frame Cover Die-cast aluminum door frame secures Patented lens, sealed with Hinge silkone gasket Assembly I-inish cola: black D 120/277V (Standard: 125W PSMH; 50 -1OOW MH; 5OW HPS) M 120/208/240/277V (Standard: 15OW PSMH; 175W MH; 70 -15OW HPS) 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (Standard: 15OW PSMH; 70 -175W MH; 70 -15OW HPS) 120V (Standard: 35W HPS) 277V 277V Reactor (150W PSMH Only) 208V 240V 480V (175W MH; 70 - 15OW HPS) 347V (Canada Only) For voltage availability outside the US and Canada, see Bulletin TD-9 or contact your Ruud Lighting authorised International Distributor. Fixture includes clear, medium -base lamp. Pulse -rated porcelain enclosed, 4kv-rated screw - shell -type lampholder. Lamp ignitor included where required. All ballast assemblies are high - power factor and use the following circuit types: Reactor (277V PSMH) 150W PSMH Reactor 120V: 35 - 15OW HPS HX — High Reactance 50 -100W MH; 50 -150W HPS CWA — Constant Wattage Autotransformer 125 & 150W PSMH; 175W MH ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in US and Canada for wet locations and enclosure classified IP65 per IEC 529 and IEC 598. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406-3772 USA m Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA PHONE (262) 886-1900 www.ru udlighting.cmn Noi -(a)F Fusing -(a)P Button Photocell -5P External Photocell (for 480V) Quartz Standby (includes 100W quartz larnp) (N/A an 277V Reactor) Specify Single Voltage -See Voltage Suffix Key Exclusive DeltaGuard® finish features an E-coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra -durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven- year limited warranty. US 4,689,729 FWG-12 _ Wire Guard_ SBL-12 Backlight Shield FAX (262) 884-3309 12/11/03 RUUD LIGHTING 6" EXTENDED POLE MOUNT 12" (305 mm) AREA CUTOFF FLOOD EPA RATING Isotootcandle plots show initial footcandles at grade. (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) EPA 0.60 for single fixture with 0° tilt (Consult factory for EPA rating on multiple units). Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 10695 Candlepower distribution curve of 175W MH Rectangular Area Cutoff Floodlight, with back- light shield located for backlight cutoff. eo' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' so 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 24.4 18.3 12-2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 0 m 6.1 122 18.3 24.4 Isofootcandle plot of 175W MH Area Cutoff Floodlight at 15' (4.6 m) mounting height, 0° vertical tilt, with backlight shield located for backlight cutoff. (Plan view) 80 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 89 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 0 m 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 Isofootcandle plot of 175W MH Area Cutoff Floodlight at 20' (6.1 m) mounting height, 0° vertical tilt, with backlight shield located for backlight cutoff. (Plan view) 80' 60' 49 29 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 1so° 150' 120' 80' 24.4 80, 24.4 MY --- - 18.3 60' 18.3 MY 12.2 40' - + 12.2 3 21Y s 6.1 20' - 6.1 90° 3 0' ■ - O m 0' - O 0 m 20' 6.1 20. 6.1 4000 4(r 12.2 40' - 12.2 s0° 000 60' 18.3 60' _. ti _- 18.3 80 24.4 80' 24.4 8000Nr 1244 18.3 122 6.1 O m 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 24.4 18,3 122 6.1 Om 6.712.2 183 24.4 Lighting Sciences Inc. Isofootcandle plot of 15OW HPS Area Isofootcandle plot of 150W HPS Area Certified Test Report No. LSI 11233 Cutoff Floodlight at 15' (4.6 m) mounting Cutoff Floodlight at 20' (6.1 m) mounting Candlepower distribution curve of 150W HPS height, 0° vertical tilt, with backlight height, 0° vertical tilt, with backlight Rectangular Area Cutoff Floodlight, with back- shield located for backlight cutoff. shield located for backlight cutoff. light shield located for backlight cutoff. (Plan view) (Plan view) �x T% Pole -spacing Example Data T%"j _' Average Initial Light Levels at Grade Test area Is centered w#Mn a (16) pole layout (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) Catalog # Lamp Type Lamp Lumens Mounting Height _Max. Recommended Pole-gmeing Footrandles Lux MAC2410-0 10OW MH 8,100 10' (3.0 m) 40' (12.1 m) x55' (16.7 m) 4.92 53 _ __ 15' (4.6 m) 60' (18.3 m) x 85' (25.9 m) 2.04 22 _ MAC2417 M 175W MH 12,000 15' (4.6 m) 60' (18.3 rn x 85' (25.9 m) 3,01 32 _ 20' (6.1 m) 75' (22.9 m) x 110' (33.5 m) 1.81 20 MAC2510-M 10OW HPS 9,500 10' (3.0 m) 40' (12.1 m) x 55' (16.7 m) 5.05 55 15' (4.6 m) 60' (18.3 m) x 85' (25.9 m) 2.08 22 MAC2515 M 150W HPS 16,000 15' (4.6 m) 60' (18.3 m) x 85' (25.9 m) 3.51 38 20'(6.1m) 75' (22.9 m) x 110'(33.5 m) 2.11 23 RUUD9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406-3772 USA PHONE (262) 886-1900 FAX (262) 884-3309 LIGHTING 0 Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudlighbng.com 12/11/03 > Photometry High intensity discharge sources /SG3 Type III Asymmetrical distribution that spreads the light forward. Recommended applications > Pedestrian walkway/bicycle path > Parking lot perimeter > Building security cc)/ ® SGQ Type VV Square O � Symmetrical distribution that spreads C: the light in a square pattern. Recommended applications a > Middle of parking lot > interior and exterior pedestrian mall > Building entryway (� GDD Compact fluorescent MH HPS 50 35 70 50 100 70 150 100 175 150 Photometry MH HPS Photometry 70 50 100 70 150 100 175 150 CF5 7i watts Type V 18 Symmetrical distribution that spreads the light in a circular pattern. 26 Recommended applications 32 > Interior and exterior pedestrian mall > Building entryway 42 > Entry hall and drop-off area wmec Photometry I > Mounting Information DBA Features one or two 1.66" (42 mm) round aluminum tubes welded to a cast pole adaptor (or wall mounting box) and one or two cast suspension rings. > Fits on 3" OD pole > Insert:6" DBB Features one or two 1.66" (42 mm) round aluminum tubes and 1/2" diam- eter rods welded to a cast Pole adaptor (or wall mounting box) and one or two cast suspension rings. > Fits on 3" OD pole > Insert:6" DBC Features a cast aluminum pole adaptor with one or two arms and one or two suspension rings. Wall mounting box with cast aluminum arm with suspen- sion ring, mechanically assembled. > Fits on 3' OD pole > Insert:6" DBG Features one or two 1.66" (42 mm) round aluminum tubes, one or two suspension rings and one or two Uz" diameter rods welded to a 3" OD vertical aluminum tube or i x 3 wall mounting tube. > Fits on 3" OD pole > Insert:9" 17" (448 mm) E E E .... N N V 0 Total EPA 1.26 sq. ft. E E E 17" (448 MM) K N -h m Total EPA �0 1.50 sq. ft. 18 3/8" (465 mm) N1 IIT Total EPA 1.27 sq. ft. 18" (457 mm) E E m m E 'a E h � N N C ba Total EPA 2.03 sq. ft. 37 5/8" (955 mm) Total EPA 2.30 sq, ft. 37 Va" (955 mm) Total EPA 2.76 sq. ft. 36 8/4" (933 mm) i t Total EPA 2.31 sq. ft. 36"(914 MM) wcattrA 2.95 sq. ft. E E E v 'q N �^ 15 1/4" (386 mm) I15 1/4" (386 mm) 12" (305 mm) E E E E � fV a 18" (457 mm) ONE—_--d. 0 0 3 c D > Bollard Ordering Information 11" (279 mm) Bolt circle QO (131t to6"0 (111 to 152 mm) O Anchor bolt C 3/8"to12"0 (19 to 304 mm) D V SOMH SE2/TX GN/TX RD4/TX 70MH BE6/TX GN4/TX WH/TX 120 BE8/TX GN6/TX TS 50HPS 208 BG2/TX GN8/TX TG 70HPS 240 BK/TX GY3/TX NP 277 BR/TX RD2/TX E 18 CF 347 26 CF PH7 32 CF VPA g 42 CF Vandalproof I hardware > Domus Small Wall Mounting Details > 2" x 3" (51 x 76 mm) horizontally mounted junction box and 4 anchor bolts 3/8" 0 (9.5 mm)(by others). > 4" (102 mm) octagonal junction box is not recommended. > 4" (102 mm) squarejunction box is suitable. > Structural members must be present in wall to accept bolts. /— Mounting plate Typical location for optional PH7 (Photocell) Wall bracket Convenient access door Lamp Luminaire Voltage Finish' Options 70MH DOSB1 120 BE2TX PH7 'Consult LUMECs colorchort samples. Weight: 4.0 Ib. (1.8 kg) Configuration Code: M Mounting Bolt Pattern 3 3/4" (95 mm) 3/8" (22 MM) Maximum bolt projection > Seeing the Smaller Picture The Small Dom us is an adaptation of the classic Dom us series. The smaller version retains the same refined lines, the same handcrafted quality, and all the features of the larger models. Incorporating precision optics, we ensure light -controlling photometric performance. EXISTING BUILDING 20 n FINAL LOCA1ION TU BE DETERMINED ONSITE WTTTI OWNERS LANDSCAPE AR FECT AND AOMNING PROPERTYOWNERS 7PN� _ lo' 0.C. NCLY Graphic Scale — _ Feet 20 0 20 40 60 80 1, IT$ — P PfG EMS7NG CANOPY T OR GAS ISLAND (TYPICAL) -- EXIgING S 1106 BED TO BE - REPLACED WHEN KMIEDY ' DRIw IS WIDENED ,SCS- - — 5. O.C. - I I KENNEDY DRIVE EXISTING CURBED ISLAND KEY SCTEN77FTC NAME PLANT LIST COMMON NAME OUAN un SIZE COMMENTS 7S. CST$ CHAENCAIELES SPECIOSA DWARF RED OUINCE 21 2 CAL. CONT 'TEXAS SCARLET CSK CCRNUS SERICEA 'KELSEW COMPACT KELSEY DOGWDOD 22 J GAL, CONT EFSE EUOITMUS FORTUND 'SILVER EDGE' SILVER EDGE WINTERCREEPER 26 J GAL. CONT. xFC JUNPERUS CHINEN9Z COMPACT PPTZM JUNIPER 20 5 CAL. CONT PFITZM— COAPACTA JCSG ,MNPERUS CHI ENSIS SEAGREEN SEAOREEN .NNIPM 13 5 GAL. —t.. PTI PAWS NIGRA AUSRBM TINE 7 5' - 6' B & B FM P011IW7LLA PNUIICOSA 'GOLDSTM' GOLDSTM CHOUEFOL IB J CAL, CONT OR 011[RNS RIIBRA RED OM 1 2 1/2- - J- B 4 B TO TMUJA OCCOENTALIS wx MAI` 11 5• - 6• y e @ B C ti TS TSUOA CMADENSIS CANADIAN HEMLOCK 22 5' - 6' B Q B WFT WDOELA FLORW"'7A X)' TMGO WEICELA IP 2 GAL COv 1. 5 ICMPOS OR&CULAWS SIIORBERRY 6 5' 'PROPOSED NC FL/1MS ALONG KFMQDY MALUS CENTURION DRIVL �Y OTFQ25) CENTURION CRABAPPLE I MSP MALUS 'STRAABERRY PMFAIF SMAeBERRY PARFAIT CRABAPPLE A AFI� G,p c �o 2 CSK �Fc C� '©4. V l Of,9 O e<671- `1101) TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS CrCE) 478 BWI Pak Pout P.O.5-308 ( =8796MlVode) William varnew 054% M= 875LOO60*4 VbB Us m BM Web ab —ThtldCa .C— RAM ALL AYlAaA ICl TM RaIRa a CONQlEUAL APMOVAL AaM6S10N PRKLIKV URY APPROVAL SLIaAIa.BDN A" 2A0 aYN1690N lle AL APPROVAL AWOSIOEI CONMUCTION DaAWD10.5 t. urwM• p Iw p.l^tiwr pmnnq. aacVnr. � wprowp wugnlw l�pm nal n1wMC u IYw bwMPNw �cTYn bwn i OrvMnpr p wn4wlM �A Vwlha�nm Imnr/om.wLa b �peM. Mrs a eMw.�.e tlwy�eaa� a m L.wynl a Iwue. eT r,,,e,A .uuny my-+.• (r¢) ewo. I A. bin 1.lWn�wNw New ylwY�pr m! tvgw U�wl M z 6py qr Y cI w to U� ba.Mr I A . —)— I-- R.N.. Pe, DRB wallOS „PP NL7. Dra�Mlm D.b. � BAV W wa "POFI LVE 7jAAQ'S e'Ia�2�, o. * N gyY��AvrRK III 2� loll HO R.Jed Title CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt Sb«E7w. Landscape Plan RawbW NLallbwI 20 3W7-sI L"mollon:__. — PIL71w -Kwgw i I" Drawn : RMP Daft: ITZ0512004 F.111.226/DC Scale: I' - 2o' PIb1ect LRm ante, XXX Mtd: 2003007nc B-Ch FL%: XXX APPro+ed SP3 NORTH VIEW MIDDLE VIEW TRUDELL CONSUMING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 N* Pm* Rwd P.O.8sx 308 M 8796331WWO) Wm.k.M V..-* 0505 00 87%OOW ud VhdtWmftwo At aww.TntlN[mAik%— TY tlduU Atl ARAtLL lOR M NIOtt OIi f.O ""UAL APPROVAL SIlAOg10U PRNaMYMY APPROVAL SUVANIM AR MO SJUASS 0U PR/AL APPROVAL SUBMISSION CONPRUcnom MAW9I0 ,.«°'eMaP.�°'•°nn°' m' ei: w:`t.." •'<nw".`•"m° . o.m°`"«a a°m".�al�'"a VtW . n.t .,t.ne« « na o-..nP. w °�.w.lim e....p• y.•4n�°•"Mo `l�nb ak m w"ma° erotiei.e .°�im'�Oa •'a.�giM«"". in.r w. .,• ten«,. �,�� ",:b.. J. N M.4vmnl.1N .xNe. m«. °r..Fgs wq wpl« mw..l �r wY n: m.a a e�i :..°1O°•nx a."s« b m• °,..•.a• «pm.bmty b «w. lM. capY c.nl.l« b. mM 4. SMst Ada.d PN M OI/OJ/05 ..PP Na Dattalp8sn Dacs ey `AI N CIW10 L A�A 111110 PtaJW 718e CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt SheM>f. Photographs Duwft Nunbw t 200J007-50 E1Ra1D1011 t 1 pmlwmam8art JPP Dw t Rup DoW, W03/2005 P.&226 Snlet 7" - 20' Pmlad tafaatast xxx X-Reft 20030070c BeMtfus, xxx APPIOVW SOUTH VIEW P1 ce z LEGEND RIM.86.80 �1 i LOT SIZE: 46,911.2 S.F. - 1.08 ACRES it ZONE: RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (R7-NC) SEWER MAINS -------- ---p__________ t USE CONVENIENCE STORE, DELI. GAS CONVENIENCE STORE, GAS STARON AND SERVICES II STATION &SERVICE GARAGE 5 FT. WATER MAINS 50 _ FRONT YARD SETBACK : 50 FT. R. 30 FT. AND SERVICES ---------------------- I SIDE YARD SETBACK: 40 FT. 40 FT. 63 FT. (WAIVER ALLOWED STORM DRAINAGE :.......... D \I (AWACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE) UNDER PUB) BEXISTINGUILDING III r' FROM YARD SETBACK AREA: 26.428 IF. LIQUID PROPANE OR NATURAL GAS I ` (ynn'■ers• OVERHEAD POWER ---------- afp--------- an---- �K,✓�DTv-I GMP 34 -- -�. :�>� ♦ . PAVEMENT BUILDING. 6579 SF OR 4.01 Z848 SF OR CIS 40K CABLE TELEVISION-------Dry------- Cry \'♦ E-_.-II \♦ PAVEMENT IN FRONT YARD SETBACK (KENNEDY DRIVE): 6,540 SF. OR 15.1; 6,540 S.F. OR 434% J(/R II `� PAVEMENT IN FRONT YARD SETBACK (HINESBURG ROAD): 5.481 SF. QR 46.1IN 5,424 SF OR 45.9X JOK TOPOGRAPHIC PAVEMENT IN FRONT YARD SETBACK (TOTAL): IZO22 SF. OR 45.SX 1I,964 S.F. OR 45.65 JOK CONTOURS BUILDING, PARKING AND ALL OTHER IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: 24043 S.F. OR 49.OK 24,659 IF OR 52.6% 709 PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD PARKING SPACES: CURB 1 1 II♦ ` 26 SPACES 27 SPACES 27 SPACES PROPERTY LINE `I } }}'I } II ♦ \$ BUILDING SETBACKS ___________ BASED ON 600 S.F. SHORT II'I i I l DOORSF ESSERVICE STAPGN NORTH NEW \\ }i } I I \ \ ,� ` ♦` \� - CURB CUTS: TREE LINE (APPROX.)HINESBi--✓wv y `I ) ♦♦`♦ KENNEDY DRIVE':URG D 0 FT 56 FT DRAINAGE FLOW > > > I 1111111\ t ',.`\ J I I I I I I•' } /�\ / \� ♦`i `\♦` SEWER MANHOLE (SMH) 1_ • DIRECTION OF PHOTOGRAPH ?2• f I I (I / / TYPICAL REFER It) SHEET PI �1` \ \ MANHOLE DRAINAGE (DUN) e (TYPICAL) } ( i ; } / / 1 \\ MANHOLE i • -- 1 1 v SEWER cLEANour (co) t I I I 9 T ♦ -q_ IT, ` RACK ♦♦T\ STORM DRAINAGE GLEN OUT p r } ' \� ♦♦ Off ♦ \ 1 --N. n RAILROAD RE CATCH BASIN (CB) ❑ ■ \ } t } \ RETAINING WALL PROPOSED J' WINE o BE \ \ \ \ \ \.._ h \♦.� VALVE M PAIN RX CONDOS TO BE \\\ o' r EXISTING LOCATED SURVER FACE . \ �� \ _011a!!6, JY 5 \ CURB STOP (Cs) • w \ . BUILDING / WITH ANT IX 5(xiPAC \ / as PLANT MIX _ _ UTILITY POLE + PROPOSED / MIDDLE VIEW •y. TRASH • •'A -A' BUY WINESTORAGE e LAWN CARE '{ J MTc OR FFE.-99.63 i♦``\ �`y' TRANSFORMER - (216 SO mwos" LUMINAARE 81NX1Y FENCE i 1 \S ' \♦ `\ Byp �,. SIGN V T l smw CHECK � f�+) IRCN PIPE (FOUND) • 1"' 01QSId1 comma m RA/iQT (rffl=W / ICE CONTROL POINT / • I L 9d _ - - ; 4 stEEl REBAR • PROPOSED slupfNG ` Ce \ 3 �ce ' CONCRETE MONUMENT (FOUND) F(2600a{A E T ,$ _-'SPR076110M( �. " - TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) ' AB DISPERSING O ' UNIT F SNOW FENCE / ,d. \\ \ \ ♦5 -- 1 SILT FEHLE r � iJcF%\ IM�9S.1 SOUT/ VIEW ICE PT 3 AV `Ih^ rS EL 100.30 I IOU/° t Q• \ �f NOTE UNDERGROUND � FUEL TANKS\ \\ ! ♦\ Y C 'INFORMAPON FROM AOMH121-1(1) PLANS FOR KENNEDY DRIVE. f 8' 11■1 \ ,� 1 RAILROAD PE IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS, SHADOW BOY STM! 1 ( k I ♦♦\ RETARpNG A — PROPOSED FENCE wni fAR1N ' yqt `� � I '/ f-� "y Y P .- _ .. �• /) CONCRETE SIDEWALK i-CONCRE PAD .g,_ ♦♦` .." C1G (TYPICAL) PROPOSED r A " PAVED DRIVE .__ � / ♦L -------------- ♦ -- - ---= J� I - __-- n �``� � Lq Mpg •lN /' $ EXISTING e, -\Oa -:? h�� .} VV M :•,a,if� CANOPY W i i GAS ISLAND ------ ••. (TYPICAL) - epsa , p> F--<-----� '-�a 1 ty of i LVR --------- SD' Bllf t�,, N86'49'17-W ! ! . 7- SHRUB BED - 9 - — ^-� ._ _ - _ _p- ... -..2{9.,2P.-. .. /'00 NOT IGE VTY --------------�--=- s ' - ♦ CMP 56 6 J _ ♦\ y - ----<- - SHRUB BED __.._.. i ----- ----------------- OGNCREIE SIDEWALK ------------------- -- APPROXIMATE CURB LOCATION FUTURE - W KENNEDY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS BY OIHVIS .LO' FN1RA14BE TUT ME KENNEDY DRIVE A OACT RG ROAD 91PRD tNENM BY OTHERS (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) S N 3e• E%ISRNG CURBED ISLAND KENNEDY DRIVE A GTaphk Scale _ 5 Feet 20 0 20 40 60 80 v TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478BWTPMk PWdd P.O. BDR308 (802J87"MI(phale) ,RmIkN`, Vanwat OBMS MM 87940600W VW W m dr Web w www.Tmde0Wl,Wtlng.mm lles RAYpX w RRAY TOl M taros w. CONQlTUAL APIkOVAL RMAUSSION TSELLMeRAkr APWovAL A>.ALrsaGN ACT 250 SUSM690N iBUIL ARlOVAL ASMLSSION COHMUCTION DRAWN" ua Aw Nmeur.+I:aI a na euwo we.M� :n�ouM awAmua a• ml.,e•p fo- w4imnwr p�.�Ma. waeam wl nlww w nna� n .e`f a c'antr�cw a,a nw�w b� b b fatly cowOFWM�.Nn�W eJNcwFb. ry w eih le Pe�m e/ TrvCpll Cpnvixip FneFw• (Ttq pM:a• pe,.w,�Y4n1BY w• of U.p• aepagp fw cpnplrvp:bn M In• PrpJpal b• .owl. bel m.nn•) ne...,f..w `9e'°wp e.a peewlw m. WepP. Yn. 4re•NN• A.eX a �Aap:.e Npa '.PPoa •w.. ael. eee a epPera. X . mw •..Ym• Nw• Jre� Y• and wpN. Inwwf c..�ew eY u. D�Mn•a b prop Qwnpw b M• bmFy eY aNY w mpa. 6 M. Gpnex e .e 0 , 0 R.M. Pe- ORB 00/0T/06 .PP NNX. DeealpUm DMe By RevMldu OF VE,P I�4 `* NOCI8104��µv* /ill;; ;�,u`P�� CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt Shoat Ttle Site Plan D..Mg Nub.: 2003007-50 L%WndDO : 1 P,*,d TOMugv I .PP DmRn I RMP Date: V05/2004 P,8.22e/DC Sews, 1--20• PTO)ectfelefeT xxx X-W, 20M7,1, BerKh FBe: KIN is r c� RIM-ee.eo , Te": EXISTING BUILDING 11 -- 11 }�.F _��ry t„ ` CMP 34 E„ 1/I! Ili tiSA. 1 l RAILROADTIE RETAINING WALL \ r \ 1 \ �• \ \ '\ 0 MMXED TREES s4-..... n NORWAY MAPLE i -16E PT NORWAY MAPLE _ NOTES? TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION BASED ON T7ELD SURVEY BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGAJEERS, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. THE ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF 101.0. PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION FROM -"STORAGE BUILDING /r 1 's \ \\. \ 100 50. FT. i GNP 35 / /O 0-; --. ut' \ \\. DROP CURB (TYPICAL) / i / . PINE �pQ'Ok�X EL. 1oo.36 /; I I I • MIXED TREES/' TELEPHONE PAD N8Y58'57'•W 46.75' N8649.17"W CMP 4 r7 _249,24•_.. - -- - -- --- -- - - -- - -- - -- ---- MSTM BUMNG 1.7,50 SO. FT. F FE.-101.0 '1 OBSERVA7ON -- \\ WELL (TYPICAL) \ J _ CAS ISLAND~ (TYPICAL) I' CANOPY CANOPY Y 09 RN-93 it ( UNDERCROIINO ,r Y \\ �• \� �' l NEL TANKS A RAILROAD TIE RETAINING WALL 0— fi CONCRETE PAO(TYPICAL) `I \ _._. _._.. • `�`..\!/ b. .. Ito,SHRUB BED ICE PT 2 EL W,186 + SHRUB BED KENNEDY DRIVE EXISTING CURBED ISLAND Ba- -91 B5 GMP 36 LEGEND SEWER MAINS AND SERVICES awsym -------- ---t---------- WATER MAINS AND SERVICES __________W_________- _ STORM DRAINAGE LIOUID PROPANE OR NATURAL OAS ---------- - ---- ---- D OVERHEAD POWER _-_______ey_____---_ UNDERGROUND POWER __________ - --------- CABLE TELEVISION -------- On, ------- TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD CURB PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACKS TREE LINE (APPROX) DRAINAGE FLOW + - + SEWER MANHOLE (SUM) p STORM DRAINAGE (OMH) MANHOLE (; SEWER CLEANOUT (CO) e STORM DRAINAGE CLEANOUT e CATCH BASIN (CB) ., VALVE M CURB STOP (CS) • UTILITY POLE �. GUY WIRE w MTC OR TRANSFORMER LUMINAIRE op SIGN 4 OBSERVATION WELL A IRON PIPE (FOUND) • TCE CONTROL POINT A STEEL REBAR CONCRETE MONUMENT (FOUND) 0 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) "INFORMATION FROM AOT NH 121-7(1) PLANS FOR KENNEDY DRIVE, CONVERTED Jqj ®�, + � Of f SO" s a TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478Bl&PMk►cmd P.O.1=30B MM879b33iWorrN WWbt.% VemTM1t 05m 01t s"'(10150*) VW l4 m dr Web at www.TwddEawlWaaom DY rIAM AM MArLL 10r. M rr•pA On CONCTlTUAL A1I0.0VAL 911ALL4910N ItRYAIMAILY A OVAL 51/M090N ACT 250 SL A RSUM MIAL ArlAOVAL A�A4S90N CONtTR11CT10N DOAWWA S• ppr.o br MM,W r. Intw,ME M pMYnFwy �Wp, O°0�°a� one "„1nGE - Mtl 4mMp� w c°mNrvcrlbn CmrNgve r , a• ywnF..n.n M,M1 °enba.t Ee°um.nt. padlk.lbn. omr/cnbeclr b mM ro M w o.°M. e. N11 wrdbel.e M1egrgMcblW. 1M1n i«..,, °.. n n. m ,NeM1, ro ur atnun m Trvar cm-,Wp Fna,..,. (Ta) wa. u ¢ By uw el q.• dro.NO. M .oroWetbn M BW �o� B,. q�i mW°�blM�MaMp� yWwl�M een�Mer.e• °�fna+lt<Pwew°ptM auemxenT`ne. m.y mctl..teb ne Wetl po,°a. t ere a mM °eplu Mrnl NmM y Nynr. M pop Q,ap» t. M. We.ba or Dolt N meM ty ,q.+m. • , brky W .e.,,. Mb m e• +0 • • Y w • • wee L I Projed L=fjon I Im AAjuteE Property Lk— M/ T/Y/O ,PP No. DualpBm Deb PaWlerr �atuuvuBF OFee VER'46y��i 0* N0(]Nl 4 PD1eaTift CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt Sheet Tide Existing Conditions Driwtrlg NUIVANW 1 2003007-20 ExedMlon : / PrOw n "w - JPP D— : RMP Nee: 1110512004 F.B.226 c SCAle: I- - 20' ft"d ldriver : XXX )(41d: XXX Bench Me: XXX Approved Graphic Scale Feet ECI 20 0 20 40 60 80 RECEIVED Permit Number SD- N S. c,'aTV6ftbUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership Mailing Address: c/o Champlain Oil Co. P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 864-5380 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book: 396 Page: 480-482 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #} Name: Champlain Oil Company Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 864-5380 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: Paul Wamsganz Mailing Address: Champlain Oil Company P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 649-3229 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 110 Kennedy Drive 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0970-0110-C 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 1,775 square foot building with convenience store and two (2) service bays, four (4) fuel pumps (8 fueling positions), and a 2,200 square foot canopy. b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Raze existing building and construct a new 2,600 sq. ft. convenience store and sandwich shop with seating. Four (4) fuel pumps (8 fueling positions) and 2,200 square foot canopy will remain. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain 2,600 sq. ft. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Not to exceed 30 ft e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 4 to 5 employees proposed g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Project is in a traffic overlay district. h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. no boundary changes proposed 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? No b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? N/A c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: I . a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: 46,911 square feet, 1.08 acres b) Building Coverage: Existing 1,879 square feet, 4.0 % Proposed 2,848 square feet, 6.1 % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 23,003 square feet, 49.0 % Proposed 24,947 square feet, 53.0 % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Kennedy Drive Existing 6,540 sq. ft, 45.4 % Proposed 6,543 sq. ft, 45.4 % Hinesburg Road Existing 5,482 sq. ft, 45.8 % Proposed 5,409 sq. ft, 45.6 % 10) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking: • front yard coverage • sideyard setback • parking lot w/in green belt 11) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $300,000 b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $8,300 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): included in building cost 12) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): IN:875 OUT: 875 TOTAL: 1750 b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): IN: 61 OUT: 60 TOTAL: 121 c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): IN: 73 OUT: 73 TOTAL: 146 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 4:30 — 5:30 PM 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Friday 15) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE November 2005 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred). o Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared. o Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.) o Location of easements, public lands, r.o.w.s, sidewalks, and public or private street (w/names). o Five foot contours (existing and finished). o Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. o Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks, and other public opens spaces. o Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. o Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative water supply. o Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. o Details of storm water facilities in the form of a drainage plan. o Details of all proposed bridges or culverts. o Location of temporary markers. o All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions. o A list of waivers desired (if any). o Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates). o A report addressing planned residential/unit development criteria in 15.18 of the Land Development Regulations. o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size). o Location of abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Number & location of parking spaces (see Section 13.01 of the Land Development Regulations). o Number & location of handicapped spaces (see Section 13.01(I) of the Land Development Regulations). o Lot coverage information: Building coverage, overall coverage, front yard coverage(s), and total lot size. o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section 13.01(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations. o If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ❑ Final Plat, Minor Subdivision $ 260.00* Final Plat, Major Subdivision or PUD $ 510.00* ❑ Final Plat Amendment $ 160.00* *Includes $10.00 recording fee Location Drawing Index Boundary Plat OSP1 Ortho Site Plan EC1 Existing Conditions SP1 Demolition Plan SP2 Site Plan SP3 Landscape Plan L1 Lighting Plan P1 Photographs D1 Construction Details D2 Construction Details D3 Construction Details Project: CONVENIENCE STORE & SUBWAY RESTAURANT EXPANSION Owner: CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY, INC. P.O. BOX 2126, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05407 (802) 8"-5380 Engineer: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. BOX 308, 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD, WILLISTON, VT 05495 (802) 87"331 (!�PTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) THM RAM A SWRM M RwIOII M CONCEPTUAL PLANS PREUMMARY PLANS ACT 2SO SUBMLSSION FINAL PLANS CONSTRUCTION DRAWW.S OIORL LLSv/C TlR.S! MI6 - THAT YOU xAv� TN untr uvEvoEl LAST REVISMI IVOSIN" CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY CONVENIENCE STORE 8. SUBWAY RESTAURANT EXPANSION KENNEDY DRIVE & U.S. ROUTE 116 (HINESBURG ROAD) - SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT R'E G E IV ow ot TCE PROJECT NO: 2003007 S'\-TCE IXI--S\2003\2003—\200300T-01-, 1151N05 3.18 PM EST EXISTING BUILDING CB RIM=86.80 h ,1 EXISTING , BUILDING ; OW 34 A/1 \` Jrrr rI llll P./ z-f -�C BERF1901 '. L, `er / EXISTING SEWER ,..w, �w�•"`�' E BE REMOVED S.`+`// RAIROAD nE RETAINING WALL 7- NORWAY MAPLE / - /.t y$ PINE ro PE ��ly REMOVED i / '.1' I ELE ro BF, Hv,lr. ro 9E J// � 'I, `Rtt PtID RELOCATED `\\ /''i % � CONCRETE PAD !y : y.., i ro. BE REMOVED LI \ EL. PT 3 ! TO BE BUED/N0 I }_ — E nNC CpNI:RETE EL. 100.36 ( 70 fiF REIIDKD ro 1 FLA I I ( 4L ...... .. J / \�\ VnnNG METAL CURB TO W. REMOVED j, i r.... •. % CONCRE* PAD REUMNTXISI7NG ~^✓y OAS D r / (TYPICAL) ) / 1. _-V \ 9 a rtz'.1 . a A\ F_ .�'•�t CANOPY LENT (TO BE TREES ( / Y RELOCATETT)-. A( /i TELEPHONE PAD M BEREMOVED r / I _ -� �• ! EL 9 •W SHRUB BED KENNEDY DRIVE -. NORWAY MAPLE -GYP u ��"F tbY.93.iT \ SHRUB BED C RAILROAD TIE �O < -'�• RETAINING WALL^-4 .... !! BLU SPRUCE \ �' � I_9, 85 • . •BEDS ,ir 5..' \i-._.N... _. 011P CRABAPPLE TREE `\ \ o> N G W 36 CRABAPPLE TREE TO BE REMOVED (BY OnERS) / EXISRNC CURBED ISLAND LEGEND F.)EL4'784G R6MOM SEWERRAMS ___________ s__________ ......... _._.......... A .......... _................ AND SERVICES WATER MAINS a__________ ....................._._..__.._......_..._... AND SERWCES STORM DRANACE LIQUID PROPANE OR NATURAL GAS __ ________a ---------- OVERHEAD POWER ---------- pp_____-___ CABLE TELEUSION -- Cry ----- TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PAVED DMVB OR ROAD.............. _......... _.... _.... _......... _....... CURB ............. PROPERTY LINE TREE LINE (APPROX.) DRAINAGE FLOW -n - + SEWER MANHOLE (SMH) 1: STORM DRAINAGE (DUN) MANHOLE _ SEWER CLEANOUT (CO) a STORM DRAINAGE CLEANOUT a CATCH BASIN (CB) .; VALVE a CURB STOP (CS) e UnLITY POLE �. GUY WIRE W MTC OR r TRANSFORMER LUMINAME SIGN V IRON PIPE (FOUND) • ICE CONTROL POINT STEEL REBAR CONCRETE MONUMENT (FOUND) 0 TRUDELL CONSULRNO ENGINEERS (TCE) RECEIVED JAM 0 izdn5 City 01 SO- Burlington z TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478B1MrPWk RwA P.0.BWt308 (9048N-Ml(phcne) WIBWon. VdmW1t OSM 04879006Ogax) VNk Lb an da Wab At %wm.ThKkr n;uk1ag=n TIaCL eA.e Ap alrAWf Iel M NWIOW M CONOIIIUAL APROVAL WM•AON LRIrLBAaUaY APPROVAL "AN"ON Att M $0M51 N PNAL A OVAL AWMIS90N CONTRUCTION nr:AWNGA mo~e�en :n� o� ercbnnt� umo..�me y�e HOC' ponnny. T.y a. na WWnMe w Aal erw.q. a wnnrv� mwlp•.t� x. wa•*w ww.w r. aw.wcNn .. WtaN.e :e n. ewe in eanNnatWn .:tn awb.at sewn, „t.( �wa� •, o.ma/ew m 1. q.ek to tln a.ol.aV Ni%wrwO uO mwwW We4.o Ftw � Oy n u�lrN t By uro oe m.w arc.nq M eawtrv�uann q•!� IZ) tZ 1N n O.nw rwrw.nt. mat (M/aw) nw r.Wwe, a to SOmg4�i w a. w C y M Cnmy.. to m. arwrtq Tyr atiY N ma! Y wn.n r gN�n.O ^San Y —Y tON. mO mo. R.M.. Pe, DRB M/GT/OS " ReWlar NNIglunuul/,,,, * NO�IVIL� * C �FNlllllllt\\VV CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116(Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt Stwo Tilt. Demolition Plan Drawing Ntmbf: 2003007-50 P wWon: I Protect -Www - " Duran: RMP Dace: ///08/2DO4 M226.DG Solee I'. 20' PTo(ect ref9e L XXX X4W, 2oOToyd, 50r h FBe r XXX App—W Graphic Scale Feet 20 0 20 40 80 I SPI /-- 0' QUC1/LE WON PPE "N' BAN C E TO AS SHOW) (ROUND TOP AS SHOW) PAINT POST WN ONE PRIMER COAT AND ONE FINISH COAT. COLOR - YELLOW b I h —...CLASS 'B' CONCRETE SUPPORT SEE SIlE PUN FOR POST LOCATONS LLEE�j ji BOUARD n.Es C SAW OUT EXISTING PAVEMENT 4BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT I',,y)YRIr DI4AI),,I \, f 1 I/2' BEARING COURSE 2 I/2' BASE COURSE �J'CRUSHED GRAVEL I c (\ op p.,.,>_ e e oQ00 �— Xo 0 0, 0 IS- GRAVEL BASE RYS •�— L>_.i5.4 r1(�ri�aies Mlel 6' SAND BORROW AND CUSHION............... I —III —I I i—III—III—I � I �—I � I —I � I-1T_I—III—III—I1 III —III —III —III —III —III COPACT BACYKFL SA MATERIAL AS REMOVED —III—III—III—III—III— B NOTE. MATCH EXISTING MATERIALS IF GREATER THAN SPECIFIED MATERIALS ! 1 1 PAVEMENT CUT LAST IWWsm oT 3 - r— (PE M) (VAOT AI06) — BEAY R) (VAOT AIDS) —CRUSHED GRAVEL (VAOT 70I05) O - •O•T �B' o`. �' �'. GRAVEL a4SE (VAGI 704.04) MWAA 60DX STAMUZAnCH FABRIC I.—TKIN IN ACCORDANCE ON MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS .• ' -- a' SAID BORROW AND CUSHION W .••.•"..•'•' .•.: ••: .•: •.' .. •:. ,'. BE USED IN POORLY DRAINED SO6S OR OVER BEDROCK (VAOT 703.03) �Jgi' "°` OR I LI I l f I-1111 IJ I I I —I N i l 11=1 C0hRACW,m FILL 0000r©© SOXSL I. SUBBASE SAND CUSHION AND SUBGPADE SHOULD BE CONSTUCTED AND COMPACTED TO ME OWIRISIONS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WN VERMGHT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION SPEOBICATIONS STANDARD A-76. WHERE MORE STRINGENT LOCAL ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN ADOPTED RELADW TO ROAD DMENSIOHS AND CONSTRUCIION, THEY SHOULD GOVERN. 2 COMPACT ALL SUBBASE MATERIALS TO 9SR MAXIMUM DENSITY (STANDARD PROCTOR). J P GROUNDWATER OR SOFT SPOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED ERED CONTACT THE ENGHEER TO DISCUSS ADM MEASURES SUCH AS UNDERDRAIN. L �_ oL UMINOUS PAVEMENT Horn caysuLlTxc a+aHrrxs Ixc. un ALYIam Hnnlro{ L-RsosHM HEAVY DUTY 3 FLAMGB MAT FAME A ORATE MEOW R-J4M OR LISARON LF240-2 1-1/2- - 2- STONE RING PLACED AROUND MET GRADE SLOPE AROUND STRUCTURE UNIFORMLY MUCH DISTURBED AREA MRAFI HIGH am. FABRIC OVER .TTUCTAE. UNDER GRATE AND UNDER STCHE 1, ME SEDIMENT MR SHALL BE CONSTRWIED BY EXCAVAMG A FEMPORMY SUMP ADJACENT TO THE .TORN DIET. THE SAP SHALL HAVE A WNW. DEPTH OF SIX INCHES MEASURED FROM THE TM RING OF ME STOIMH MET. CUT ROPES SHALL BE I I OR FLATTER AND STABILIZED MIN MACH TO PREVENT EROSION. 2. INLET MOIECTHIN SHALL BE PROVIDED BY WRAPPING FILTER FABRIC (MWAFI 140) O4ER THE OPENING AND UTI DNG 1-1/2' -2- STONE FOR FXTRAnON OF SEGMENT. 3, ME STRUCARE SHALL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RAN EVENT AND REPMR. MADE AS NEEDED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE MR MIEN THE MATERIAL HAS ACCUMULAim TO MNIN A' Of NNE INLET. YGIMENT SHALL BE SPREAD OVER STABILIZED AREAS ON ROPES LESS THAN 4R AND P NECESSARY SEEDED ON GRASS TO PREVENT EROSION. {. ME TEMPORARY BASIN SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND STAMIZED ON SOD UPON APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF ROOTS OR OMER MOODY VEGETATION AS WELL AS OVERSIZED STONE AND ROCKS STONE INLET PROTECTION 6' CONCRETE SLAB, BROOM FISH �12 REINFORCING SON BARS 12' EIC. WAYS J" fXEAR v. 12' BANK RUN GRAVEL -CO.MPACTEO SUBGRAOE 3 REINFORCED CONCRETE PAD 3)SLT FENCE SMALL BE INSPECTED MEEKLY AND AFTER (MIRAFI ENMRDFENCL OR APPROVED EACN SIGNIFICANT PRECIPITATION EVENT. EQUAL MAY BE SUBSTNTED.) MAINTENANCE SHALL SE PERFORMED AS NEEDED, AND ALTER FABRK, M WOVEN E Y SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVEDIEN M'BULGES' MINE FABRIC DEVELOP IN THE FENCE, WOODEN OR METAL STAKE 4)BROGE'N STAKES SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY, KEY FABRIC INTO GROUND (MN. 6") FLOW CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS SLT FENCE SHALL BE EITHER PRE -FABRICATED EROSION CONTROL FENCE (MWAFI mm""NCE. OR EQUAL , (MR CONSTRUCTED -IN -PLACE, AS SPE ED HEREIN. PRE-FARRHCAlEO SILT FENCE I)FENCE SHALL SE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO GROUND CONTOURS AND FILTER FABRIC SIDE SHALL FACE UPSTREAM. MESH AND STAKES SHALL FACE DOWNSTREAM. 2)TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED MINIMUM 6 INCHES DEEP ON UPSTREAM SIT OF FENCE LINE. EXCESS FILAR OF TIER FABRIC (MINIMUM a INCHES) SHALL BE PLACED IN TRENCH. TRENCH SHALL BE me KFIum AND COAPAOw. cONsmuctm IN INS MANNER PREVENTS SEDIMENT -LADEN RUNOFF FROM FLOWING UNDER SILT FENCE. I iEO-IN- H T FEN 1)FENCE POST SHALL BE DRIVEN, 10 FEET MAXIMUM OV CENTER; POSTS SHALL BE DRIVEN MINIMUM 24' BELOW GRADE. FENCE SHALL SE POSITIONED AS SHOWN. PARALLEL TO ME GROUND CGHTOIRS. 2)TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED WADI 6 INCHES DEEP ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE LATE. 3)WOVEN HIRE FABRIC((1{ GA., 6 INCH MAX. MESH OPENING) SMALL BE 3TARLm OR FASTENED SECURELY WOVEN HIRE FABRIC SHALL EXTEND MNIMUM 36 INCHES ABOVE GRADE. 4)FTTER FABRIC SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF WOVEN ORE FABRIC ON MIRE TES, SPACED EVERY 24 MCIMS, AT TOP AND M)- SECTION OF FENCE, MINIMUM B INCH MP OF PIER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED IN TRENCH ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE, AND BACKFILLED. S)OIEN TWO SECTIMS OF FABRIC ALVOIN EACH OTHER, THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY 6 INCHES FOLDED AND STAPLED. 6)SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY, AND VIER EACH SIGNIFICANT PRECIPITATION EVENT. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEOW,, AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN "BULGES' DEVELOP IN SIT FENCE. 6SILT FENCE ' - 1'- ' NOBS' STAKE ONLY IN EX11tEYELY 0)0� WINDY CONDITIONS. .IF KNOWN, PLANT TARN BARKED TREES WIN THE SAME SUN (LT !/AY, ORNN GH WRAPAR WIN WHITE POLYPROPYLENE WRAP � 'BURLAPLOOSEN, CUT. A, REMOVE � NATURAL BURLAP FROM BALL MO) TOP 1/3 OF RODT REMOVE smMETIC BURL 0) jp NM WAIN -WE BASKETS pp0470 QAYW'W aT A-1 BOTTOM RINGS. PARTIALLY BACKFALL THEN REMOVE REMAINING ORE. PLANT TREE AT SAME DEPTH AND N LAME ORIENTATION AS TREE WAS GROWN - 3'LAYERSHREDDED BARK MULCH (TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE MO,TEC OV£R PERMEABLE WEE F DO NOT PLACE XT TD IRFF 1 3' SAUCER RIM lum T �I 11I- -I-ICI-1Mi11IJTCII �ROroiILL. EXISTING SOIL To DEPN OF BALL P SOIL IS PREDOMINATELY CLAY OR GRAVEL PLANT PIT WON INCORPORATE — 3X BALL DIA. CROAMC MATERAL 9 TREE PLANTING DETAIL (WELL TO MODERATELY DRAINED SOIL) zoo2 L TRaDss mcaFlcAnons: 1/2- EXPANSON/CONTRACDON JOINT WITH ASPHALT IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD FILLER EVERY SO FEET. SCORED OR TOOLED JOINT (I- DEAN QU 1/3 THE TOTAL DEPTH OF WALK) ON A SEPARATION DISTANCE EQUAL TO ME WIDM OF THE SIDEWALK. FULL -BREAK OR COMPLETE JOINT EVERY 20 FEET. NOTE: DISTANCES ARE TYPICAL AND MAY BE ALTERED FOR SPECIFIC SITE CONOMMS. a" REFER TORTE PLAN FOR MTN 4 (TMG( CCWCBEIE BEAR COURSE 000 IS) BA � ' MINIMUM 6' GHAVTi Y ( 4 \ TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK S'AO1M VARES OEPDMINO aN GUNNEL ROPE _I 1 STONE WLL BE PLACED LW A FILTER FABRIC FOUNDATION M THE ONES GRADES AND LOCATIONS SHONTN IN THE A PLAIT. 2. SET WAGING tK CHECK DAMS TO SAME ZLEVAIION _ ASSUME MAT THE ELEVATKNS OF THE NEST OF THE DOWNSTREAM DAM IS AT THE SAME ELEVATION OF TIE TOE OF ME LPSTREAM DAM. T(X 3. EXTEND RIFE SiGE A MIYA G1 1.3 FEET BEYOND WE DITCH BANKS TO PREVENT CUTTING AROUND THE DAM. PR4EILE A 4. PROTECT ENE CHARNEL DOWNSTREAM OF ME LOWEST ONEC K DAM FROM SCOUR y B AND EROSON ON STOVE OR LINER AS APPROPRIAIE. - 3. EN MAT CHANNEL 9' MIN APPURTENANCES SUCH AS CULVERT ENTRANCES BELOW CHECK DAIS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO OHMAGE OR BLOCKAGE FROM y� S 1 DISPLACED STONE VE,S-X� j}L,��pyl V1 S. TO BE PLACED IN OT0IES OVER W.;dl FLIER FABRIC of `- M If RIP RAP IS HOT INSTALLED M1NIN '•K}'(} 2'-Ta' ORAOFD STONE 24 HOURS AFTER CTCH IS CLEANED OR AS ORDERED BY ENGINEER. B 594T9N AA MAXIMUM DRAINAOE AREA 2 ACRES H� � - 34' MAX 1 f1 .-s t _- �1 B CENTER CHECK DAMS DITCH SLOPE SPAONG - FEET i so SECTION B-B 6 M 6 36 7 30 a z. /'71 STONE CHECK DAM pw Ruoeu coNsuLnNG ENCNEERs Gasr RTMsro eAizoioJ (TOLBE APPROVED BY —OSCAPE ARCHITECT) OVER PEMEABLE WEED 0 9 / FABRIC. DO NOT PLACE CLOSE TO MAN STEM. m �p �( I 3' SAUCER RN ..•� NOTOTU E..STWG SOL. TO T r DEPTH OF BALL PLANT PIT WOW JX NOTES BALL DIA - 'PLANT 94RUS AT SAME DEPTH AT WHICH SHRUB HAD PREVIOUSLY GROWN LOOSEN, OUT, a REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL -SHREDDED BARK MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC ro BE CGH- TMUDUS WEN USED N BEDS. ID BALL AND BURLAP SHRUB zoaz mI.TENt cGHsw.m+c LNONFrRs - TFMPNMARY ER04lN O]TITR Ae IRF< I) THE SMALLEST PRACTCAL AREA OF LAND SHALL BE EXPOSED AT ANY ONE TOE. 2) CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL FAMIIIES. EROSION AND SEDIMENT MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED POOR M ANY FARM MOVING OPERATIONS. 3) SLY FENCE PLACEMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED AS NOTED ON PLANS PERIODICALLY SRT FENCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND CLEANED AM ALL O'SnAMED AREAS NAVE A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS 4) BEGIN PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY MULCHING AND SEEDING IMMEDIATELY AFTER LOWsiRUCnGH OF' ALL FILL AND Wr SLOPES 6) AFTER ALL DISTURBED AREAS TUNE BEEN STABILIZED TIE TEMPORARY EROSION CONROL MEASURES ARE TO SE REMOVED. 1) THE CONTRACTOR SMALL DISTURB AND OPEN TRENCH ME MINIMUM PRACTICAL AREA REQUIRED TO ACCOMPL64 EACH DAYS WORK. 2) EXCAVATED TRENCH MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF TRENCH. 3) MAEDIATLY FOLLOWNG PPE INSTALLATION, RIFE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED, COMPACTED, AND IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED (MULCHED AND SEEDED OR SODDED). 4) 1E Ib0RARY SOT FENCES SHALL BE PLACED WMEGATELY DOWN STREAM (AND PARALLEL TO TIE CONTOURS) OF ANY MARK AREA NTENBED TO BE DISTURBED FOR MORE MAN ONE WORKING DAY. S) EXCAVATION AND PIPE INSTALLATIH SHALL BE AVOIDED DURING PERIODS OF IRGRFICANT PRECIPITATION. 6) ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES AND VEGETAIVE STABRIZARON SHALL BE ACCORDANCE MM NE SPECIFICATIONS HEREON AND THE VERMONT HANDBOOK FOR SOL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ON CMSTTUCTIM SITES. 1 EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1 TRl]DELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (rCE) 478BWTPak R.A P.O.B"308 (802)87"Ml(phale) WRIO , VmIMW Osm W2) 87%0060(b.) \HWITjsm"Vhb6b NNN.71116frowuRk 001R _ _ Au aRTATLL RDW I1a WaF061 DA CONC P ATPROVAL AlML[ADN PRUJM94MY APPROVAL SMIM6SION ACT 200 SIAMQS[NN PBUL APPROVAL ]WM390N CONSTRUCTION GRAY m4GS Ge.lnp.en nNa mHttM me In�e.e N. 1 1XXFary PmnFp, fimlFatbn w Wv �uMI,NA m4 apppMnp NWpxM. ev mA net FtNi4M a Fa m caNrveMn 4rnFpA ae.Fa P. 1 a eeeewpum m. m.eAI.AI tea .AIAII F Nonwn Mtn weVaet 4oeumm4 q.mXeamo. oenW/em m tm qdh to MI V, - II% =FaXEISXIe�MrlayM�.W W bwat b UN alMUen el Lru4M CmeulWFp FnaNn. (M) peNmeme .� er ... el a sar�p. a emmwoum, N to v.olKt. me .grrnN art (M/M) He. reA.e.U, Rep smrvwwi ma I.wFa ma e. ooewmw�a i peace NMr rwl.. MON ena Ieea peP:ewl. .y Wy M[el � . umwmbwa.�Y�yp. Grnmww �o m.pam.Fpc y N M6n M. E^Ww. No. DmHa$8oe Dp, M �QN\16 OFII VER FYXX i ..�e• F`R+' * NO. 11 4 * S <Nt�pLp to 1 1111 CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt SABBtilBe Construction Details D1aWr4Nu6wt 2003007-70 13*wm n: 00 I'mod--W, JPP DLBwR, RMP Date: 1012912LI04 Sirs, AS SHOWN DI COLORS SYMBOL - RED (REFLECTIVE) LEDGENO AND BACKGROUND - WIE (RELECRYE) ENCAPSULATED LENS �THESS THE REWlA1ORY SIGN WOW OR TINS DETAIL SHALL NAV£ QUITE TEXT ON REl£CTORIZED QUITE BACKGROUND. THE COLORS SHALL COEORM WTH ME COLORS ADOPTED BY ME AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION O ALS AND APPROVED BY THE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION. FEDERAL MGHWAY ADMM`STRA`TCM. INICG6Li ME SIN BASE MATERIALS USED FOR ME REGULATORY SIGN SHOW ON THIS DETAIL MAY BE ANY OF THE FOLLOWNO O ME MNIBIM THICKNESS NOTED. 21' C 21' r 21' 21' x 30" J6'C JO' J6' x 21' 12" r Ir 30' x Is" J6' x J6' fr 30• r 30' 16' + 16' 60' G FIAT SHEET ALUMINUM 0.060• 0.'. 0.100' 0.1T6' NIGH DENSITY OVERL.VD PLYMOLXI 1/T' I/2' S/B• B/B• GALVANIM FLAT SHEET STEEL I6 GAGE 16 CAGE 11 GAGE 12 GAGE THE REFLECIIIf MATERIAL FOR GROPED MOUNTED SINS SHALL BE FLAT TOR 1WITE REFIFCTIVE SI TMG APPLIED TO ME ENTIRE S—GROUND O THE SIGN. THE TEXT OF' THE SKNS MAY BE LETTERING I", SRK SCREENED, OR NAND PAINTED. WHEN HAND PAINTED POOR WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE CAUSE FOR REJECTION. REGULATORY SIGNS SNAIL MEET ME YERMOVT STANDARD SPECVICATORS FOR 'mmm 'TRAFFlC SIGNS'. 1DR.� LMMS. DIGTS, ARROWS SPACMG AND TEXT DIMENSIONS SHALL CONFORM WIN THE STANDARD ALPHABETS AND DESIGNS PRESCRIBED N THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. SOURCE : VERMORT A.O.T STANDARD E-113 �omvoo®am®am©®n E \ "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN r-o' --GROLNDWO TERMNAL ----NAND HOLE AND COVER ----UGHT ROE G OUNOMG BUSNMG (2 PCs) BASE PLATE NOTE : DIMENSIONS DEPENDENT ON ACTUAL FIXTURE USED SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS FOR BOLT PATTERN LAYOUT FINISHED GRADE —STEEL ANCHOR BOLTS i I/2- PVC CONDUIT J//' PVC SCH /0 In A'• OR MOD GALVANIZED STEEL (2 PCS) L 16SCWOTUBE _I .{•� ' ELECTRICAL BONDING CONDUCTORS AND ORDUNO ELECTRODE PER r••�)••�)• ART. 2S0 N.E.C. 1T-III. III -III, ! + \ LUMINAIRE FOOTING "WE SAFETY NEMER THE PROFESSIOMAL ACTIVITIES OF MUDELL CONSULTING ENGEERS. WC. (ICE). NCR ME PRESENCE OF TOE OR ITS EMPLOYEES AND SUBCOVSULTANTS AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE. SHALL RELIEVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ANY OTHER ENTITY OF THEIR OBUCATON% DUTIES AND RESPONSe UTES INCLUDWO BUT NOT UNTO TO. CON MUCBON MEANS. METHODS. SEQUENCE. TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR PERFORMWD SUPERMTEDMG OR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OR THE MORN OF CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WM TIE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REQUWED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCIES TCE AND ITS PERSONNEL NAVE NO AUTHORITY TO EIEROW ANY CONTROL OVER ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR OR OTHER ENTITY OR HEMP EMPLOYEES M CONNECTION WIN THEM WORT( OR ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIORS. THE CLIENT AGREES MAT ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JDBSIIE SAFETY, AND WARRANTS MAT IS INTENT SHALL BE MADE EVIDENT N ME C ENT'S AGREEMENT WM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE CLIENT ALSO AGREES THAT THE CLIENT, TOE AND ICE'S CONSULTANTS SHALL BE NGEMNIFlEO AND SHALL BE MADE ADDITIONAL NSURERS UNDER ME GENERAL CONMACTOWS GENERAL LIABNITY INSURANCE POKY. L7 a ❑mEMBTVTs ALL DOCUMENTS INOUAWG CALCULATIONS COMPUTER FILES. DRAWNGS, AND SPEOFILATIONS PREPARED BY ICE PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT ARE NSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSDHAL SERVICE WIENOED FOR 111E ONE-TIME USE N CCWSMUCTION Or THIS MRO.ECT. THEY ARE AND SHALL REMAIN ME PROPERTY OF TEE. ANY REUSE WMOI/T WMTIEN APPROVAL OR ADAPTATION BY ICE IS PROHIBITED. IT IS ME RESPONSIBILITY OF ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN AND MAWTAN A OG SAFE PERMIT CONTACT DD SATE AT I-BBB-JI{-7TJJ. A DID SAFE PERMIT IS REWIRED PRIOR TO ANY DICGNIG OR A CONSTRUCTION STE. IrS THE LAW' 6 SPECIAL NOTES Y IL 7 b HANDICAPPED q PARKING ONLY A I -- rx2'x,�b• s,EEL ,vBE i•:9 6ro• w STUDS. TYPICAL }.I. � CONCRETE SETTING LULL a IT" AIM. 2 HANDICAP PARKING SIGN J 1•-1•-O• RUM AC SERVICE 230W METAL HALIDE IES TYPE NI OSIIBDUTIOR DART( BRONZE FINISH IOf0. K 8� SEE LUMINAIRE FOOTING DETAIL 3 TYPICAL LUMINAIRE �. CXI�'T1NA3 GliAi�E. eu�csBuw �wA(x l `ntaosEa, tPrMr. tv14DING y S SECTION A -A' (17 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (GCE) 07S Bkk Pak RDRd P.O. BON NO MM 979bi3t(Pl ) woultaN. Va11NEB OBNS MM 870406004 M* W OL fIW web aQ MM'W.ThW6EBCAIIN6ft.ODB1 Mf RA,O AR IIITAu ,tx Tta RWI'OiW Oh COII<pTUI APMOVAL AlMIiLOfI PROJMPUIY APPROVAL SAS ACT L' 0 SUBSOMON MNAL AMOVAL ANNS1gN CONSTWMCTION ORALVDJCB. In�y eowamtlwog aMcNntb utXtl.N mE wWa.nR auMa lMba n n w wNp. a can.IrvnM Irvanpa :�o-.wq. HMp>.a a wa.watba >. Mt.H.a b w xw n apw�iiwb aM b M NI mN ��_��dY�W� N y m er�w,n� m tl�i. o�tbn�pw at now ConaNtp EnR..wa (TEE) VaTv. O.n� Inpra.nU Wa (M/�ilwJ nw r.�N. wpmwJ. a�0 wwpba a�ae � .� °rwMRr ea a waMp.a •MnN Approve b.y rwMn .tab aM Iwb apvwd. 1 A. Hr N.» Crv� P anE wq.. Ni«W NmY Li maEa 6Y IM Engnaw. OaMw to M. baaFp" a VM U.w'. rrya fty b wM Wb copy eanMba lM mwt AT RMNM Pe ORB W/OW jw No. Dlebulptlon DBN y PevLhW Pr*Ct 7me CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt 3hw 1711e Construction Details DFmVdMNunber: 2003007-7I EILE nd=l 00 PlgectrEl111Wj'a, JPP DMNlt RAW DIN, 1012912004_SOIe: AS SHORN Approved D2 �T TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) January, 3, 2005 Ray Belair Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Champlain Oil Company 110 Kennedy Drive Dear Ray: tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com On behalf of Champlain Oil Company, we are submitting the Application for Final Subdivision Plat Review for the reconstruction of the existing convenience store at 110 Kennedy Drive. The proposed project consists of razing the existing 1,775 square foot building that houses a convenience store and two automobile service bays, and constructing in its place a new 2,600 square foot convenience store and sandwich shop with seating. The existing 2,200 square foot canopy and four fuel pumps will remain. The applicant is seeking the following waivers from the Land Development Regulations: • Front yard coverage: The existing lot sits on the corner of two streets and therefore is subject to the requirements of a front yard on two sides. Existing front yard coverage on Kennedy Drive is 45.5%, proposed is 45.5%. Front yard coverage on Hnesburg Road is currently 45.5% and proposed coverage is 45.4%. No net increase in front yard coverage is proposed. Maximum front yard coverage per the Regulations is 30%. • 15-ft continuous green strip: The Regulations require that a continuous strip fifteen feet in width traversed only by driveways and sidewalks be maintained. The Hnesburg Road frontage currently has parking spaces within the 15-ft green strip that will be removed when the proposed project is constructed. The Kennedy Drive frontage green strip also currently contains a portion of the parking lot that is necessary for traffic circulation on -site. • Sideyard setback: A 65-foot setback is required for buildings on commercial lots that border lots that are zoned residential. The existing building currently maintains a 40-ft setback, which the application is requesting to be the requirement for the proposed building. The area within the setback is wooded. P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting Enclosed are the Final Plat Application, five full-sized sets of plans, one reduced sex, the Plant List, and lighting cut sheets. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 0 .1 t �" Abigail Lisius Project Engineer Encl. cc. Paul Wamsganz S:\ TCE PROJECTS\2003\007 COCO- K=Wy DiO007BelairL01doc South .Airlington Fire DepartiJent 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief � 0 c February 1, 2005 Ms. Juli Beth Hinds, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Champlain Oil Company — Kennedy & Hinesburg Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed re -construction of the Champlain Oil mini -mart at the corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road. I am familiar with the location and know where the building will be situated. The preliminary plans seem to be OK and I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Labor and Industry Fire Prevention Division codes and standards. 2. Installation of the necessary fire alarms required for an occupancy such as this. 3. Provide an emergency key box, location to be specified by SBFD. At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and Labor and Industry. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. erely, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief �T TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) November 3, 2004 Paul Wamsganz Champlain Oil Company P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 RE: Kennedy Drive Traffic Dear Paul: tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsulting.com In response to comments from South Burlington staff, you asked what square footage would be required to reduce the vehicle trip generation (mathematically) for the proposed Kennedy Drive convenience store/deli to the existing levels. As discussed in the TRIP GENERATIONAND DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS dated June 29, 2004, several properties with the same land use (gas station/convenience/deli) were studied to determine a trip generation rate for the combination gas station, convenience store, and deli because the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, does not have a similar land use category. Based on the sites studied, we derived a regression formula which predicts traffic as it relates to building square footage (as required by South Burlington Zoning Regulations) for the proposed use: # of vehicle trips = (0.0143 x Square Feet of Store) + 109 Originally, Champlain Oil had proposed a 3,250 square foot store, which we calculated would generate 156 total trips, or 10 new trips, based on the regression formula. Using the same equation, if square footage is solved for using the existing number of vehicle trips, 146, the new store should be 2,600 square feet to result in no net increase in traffic. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) A, Abigail A Lisius Project Engineer cc. 03007WamsganzL02.doc P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting PUBLIC HEARING. SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVEL- OPMENT MIE11el.BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a .public hearing at the South Burlington City y, Conditional Use apolica- Hall Conference Room, 575 tion #CU-04-20 of iAresLey iz Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Patricia Eldred for condition - February 1, 2005, at 7:30 al use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional P.M. to consider the follow- Use Review, of the South ing: Burlington Land 1. Final plat application #SD- Development Regulations. 04-91 of Need(eman's, Inc., Request is- for permission to to amend a previously expand the single family approved planned unit Bevel- dwelling by enclosing a 560 opment consisting of a ! sq ft portion of an open 107254 sq ft shopping cen- porch, 114 Central Avenue. ter in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of 5. Public Hearing: Final adding 580 sq ft of mezzo- plat application #SD-05-02 nine space for a total of of Champlain Oil Co. for a 107,834 sq ft for both build- lanned unit develo ment ings, 570 Shelburne consisting ting of: 1) razing a 1775 sq ft convenience store 2. Conditional Use applica- and service station building, tion #CU-04-18 of Brad and 2) constructing a 2600 Rabinowitz Architect, for sq ft building with 2000 sq conditional use approval ft.of convenience store use under Section 14.10, and 600 sq ft of short-order Conditional Use Review of restaurant use with 20 seats the South Burlington Land maximum in conjunction Development Regulations. with service station use can - Request is to amend a previ- sisting of four (4) fuel ously approved plan fora pumps (eight (8) fueling 16,700 sq ft building for positions) and a 2200 sq ft animal shelter use. The canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive. amendment consists of retaining an existing build- ing for use as a single family dwelling (caretaker cottage) are available for public 60 Kindness Court. inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. 3. Conditional Use applica- tion #CU-04-19 of Humane John Dinklage,-Chairman Society of Chittenden County South South Burlington for conditional use approval Review Board under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of January 12, 2005 the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The amendment consists of creating a 7,257 sq t fenced -in Supervised dog pLay area, 142 Eindness court. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT,C)F'PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 12, 2005 John H. Jackson, President Manor Woods Homeowner's Assoc. P.O. Box 93 Burlington, VT 05402 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON PEPART1VIEW OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUI'11 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 19, 2005 Paul Wamsganz Champlain Oil Company P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Wamsganz: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the December 21, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, L Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 DECEMBER 2004 Mr. Dinklage noted they had been talking about a 50-foot rear yard setback and it is now 40 ft. Mr. Belair noted they have 10 more parking spaces than required and some of those could be green space. He showed another area which could be green as well. Mr. Pitroski agreed to remove 3 parking spaces and "green them" up. Mr. Dinklage said he has a problem with them not being equal at least to the existing site plan, especially the rear yard setback. Mr. Robertson noted a memo from Bruce Hoar indicating that this design is incorporated into the Kennedy Dr. plans. Mr. Belair asked if the snow fence in back would be there only in winter. Mr. Pitroski said it would be there only during construction. There will be no permanent fence there. Mr. Jackson, president of Manor Woods, said they are the only neighbor and have lived as neighbors for a long time with no real objections, but that situation was different from what is being proposed. He said 37% of the residents of Manor Woods are in the nearest building to the gas station. This means more noise and lights shining into their building. He didn't feel that was right. He felt the building should be where it now exists. Mr. Dinklage noted that loading and unloading will be toward the front with the new plan, not near the Manor Woods building as it used to be. Mr. Cairns added they will. not be running the business 24 hours a day. Mr. Jackson also noted a proposed berm has been removed from the plan. Mr. Cairns said it would require cutting down trees. Mr. Pitroski said they could consider a 6 foot wooden sound fence which wouldn't cost any trees. There is also a dense evergreen growth. Mr. Pitroski agreed to fence from the path the entire length of the parking area. Public hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-86 of Champlain Oil Co. for a planned unit development consisting of. 1) razing a 1775 sq ft convenience store and service station building and 2) constructing a 2600 sq ft building for convenience store use and short-order restaurant with seating, 110 Kennedy Drive: The applicant reiterated their agreement to put in a fence about 75 feet long behind the proposed evergreens. They will maintain the fence. The dumpster will be enclosed. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will stipulate that the dumpster pickup must be after 7 a.m. Ms. Thomas said the Board could choose to require the applicant to maintain the existing setback. She noted the new front corner is on the boundary. Mr. Pitroski acknowledged it is 25 ft. closer than the existing building. Mr. Dinklage said the location for the air pump must be shown. Members agreed they wanted the applicant to meet the front yard coverage requirements. M DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 DECEMBER 2004 Mr. Kupferman asked about stormwater. Mr. Pitroski said they will maintain the existing system. Mr. Boucher then moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-86 of Champlain Oil Company subject to the stipulations in the draft motion with the following amendments: Stipulation 2d was added as follows: The final plat plans shall be revised to show a six foot solid fence (approximately 75 feet in length) south of the proposed building to be placed between the proposed Austrian Pines and the existing tree line. Stipulation 2e was added as follows: The final plat plan shall be revised to show an air dispensing unit if one is proposed. Stipulation 8 was amended to read: The dumpster pick-up shall be between 7:00 a.m. and 8 p.m. Mr. Farley seconded. The motion passed unanimously. 7. Continued site plan #SP-04-41 of The City of South Burlington and Rotary Club of South Burlington to construct a 980 sq ft open air public band shell, 1000 Dorset Street: Mr. Boucher raised the question of the requested landscape waiver and suggested an area at the back for some landscaping. He felt the rules should apply to everyone. Mr. Wilking said that area is required for trucks unloading pianos, etc. They did agree to put in some bushes near the box in back. Mr. Wilking said the height of the bandshell will be 21'4" from floor to top. Mr. Bresee raised the question of the open side of the bandshell facing toward the incoming weather. Mr. Boucher then moved to approve Site Plan #SP-04-41 of the City of South Burlington and Rotary Club of South Burlington subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application 4SD-04-87 of Thomas E. Chase to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 20,300 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of site modifications to adjust parking layout and add a gravel path, 46 Bowdoin Street: Mr. Chase showed the location of the proposed path. -5- Ctku_ln �► DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 DECEMBER 2004 No issues were raised. 5. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-04-81 of Paul and Linda Effel to subdivide a 0.57 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into two lots of 0.26 acres (lot #1) and 0.31 acres (lot #2), 33 Barber Terrace: Ms. Effel said the driveway to Lot #1 goes directly into a garage, a very short stretch. To have one drive for both lots would require looping it, so they made 2 drives. Ms. Young, a neighbor, asked if the 2 driveways would be from Barber Terrace. Ms. Effel said yes. Mr. Robertson said the driveway would be about 10 ft. from the Young's property line. Mr. Boucher asked what kind of buffer there is between the properties. Ms. Effel said some small trees, a cedar hedge. Ms. Young said there is no buffer between the house and the proposed drive. Mr. Belair reminded the Board they are not creating a plan for a house/driveway, just a plan for a subdivision. He asked that the house be removed from the plan because the Board is not approving it. Mr. Dinklage said this is a conforming lot in terms of size. Neighbors were concerned they have no say in what happens in their neighborhood. Mr. Dinklage explained the limits of the DRB's authority. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-04-81 of Paul and Linda Effel subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. �Velopment ketch plan application #SD-04-85 of Champlain Oil Co. for a planned unit consisting of: 1) razing a 1775 sq ft convenience store and service station building, and 2) constructing a 2600 sq ft building with 1500 sq ft of convenience store use and 1100 sq ft of short-order restaurant use with 20 seats maximum, in conjunction with a service station use consisting of four fuel pumps (eight fueling positions) and a 2200 sq ft canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Belair noted this is a new sketch plan as the last sketch plan was more than 6 months ago. Mr. Dinklage questioned the increase in front yard coverage. He said he thought there was an agreement the coverage wouldn't increase. Mr. Pitroski said they would increase the 15 ft green strip. He showed the greened up area and proposed parking for employees. On the Kennedy Dr. side they will move the curb cut further from the intersection to line up with the Kennedy Drive improvements. The canopy will not move. One entrance will be one way because of the island. -3- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 DECEMBER 2004 Mr. Dinklage noted they had been talking about a 50-foot rear yard setback and it is now 40 ft. Mr. Belair noted they have 10 more parking spaces than required and some of those could be green space. He showed another area which could be green as well. Mr. Pitroski agreed to remove 3 parking spaces and "green them" up. Mr. Dinklage said he has a problem with them not being equal at least to the existing site plan, especially the rear yard setback. Mr. Robertson noted a memo from Bruce Hoar indicating that this design is incorporated into the Kennedy Dr. plans. Mr. Belair asked if the snow fence in back would be there only in winter. Mr. Pitroski said it would be there only during construction. There will be no permanent fence there. Mr. Jackson, president of Manor Woods, said they are the only neighbor and have lived as neighbors for a long time with no real objections, but that situation was different from what is being proposed. He said 37% of the residents of Manor Woods are in the nearest building to the gas station. This means more noise and lights shining into their building. He didn't feel that was right. He felt the building should be where it now exists. Mr. Dinklage noted that loading and unloading will be toward the front with the new plan, not near the Manor Woods building as it used to be. Mr. Cairns added they will not be running the business 24 hours a day. Mr. Jackson also noted a proposed berm has been removed from the plan. Mr. Cairns said it would require cutting down trees. Mr. Pitroski said they could consider a 6 foot wooden sound fence which wouldn't cost any trees. There is also a dense evergreen growth. Mr. Pitroski agreed to fence from the path the entire length of the parking area. 6. Public hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-86 of Champlain Oil Co. for a planned unit development consisting of. 1) razing a 1775 sq 1t convenience store and service station building and 2) constructing a 2600 sq ft building for convenience store use and short-order restaurant with seating, 110 Kennedy Drive: The applicant reiterated their agreement to put in a fence about 75 feet long behind the proposed evergreens. They will maintain the fence. The dumpster will be enclosed. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will stipulate that the dumpster pickup must be after 7 a.m. Ms. Thomas said the Board could choose to require the applicant to maintain the existing setback. She noted the new front corner is on the boundary. Mr. Pitroski acknowledged it is 25 ft. closer than the existing building. Mr. Dinklage said the location for the air pump must be shown. Members agreed they wanted the applicant to meet the front yard coverage requirements. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: December 14, 2004 \drb\sub\champlain_oil\preliminary.doc Plans received: November 12, 2004 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT— 110 KENNEDY DRIVE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-03-86 Agenda #8 Meeting Date: December 21, 2004 Owner Applicant C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership Champlain Oil Company, Inc. c/o Champlain Oil Company, Inc. PO Box 2126 PO Box 2126 S. Burlington, VT 05407 S. Burlington, VT 05407 Engineer/Designer Property Information Paul E. Wamsganz Tax Parcel 0970-00110-C Champlain Oil Company, Inc. Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial P.O. Box 2126 (R7-NC) District; Traffic Overlay District — Zone S. Burlington, VT 05407 5 District ± 0.9 Acres Location Map >�t� Mom, 91.9 r 4 f \• A dr rv;Adam � aµ ,M ` CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\preliminary.doc Champlain Oil Company, Inc., hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting preliminary plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing an existing 1,775 square foot service station with a convenience store building and 2) constructing a 2,600square foot convenience store with short order restaurant having 20 seats in conjunction with a service station use consisting of four (4) pumps (8 fueling positions) and a 2,200 square foot canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive. The subject property contains approximately 0.9 acres and is located in the Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial (R7-NC) District and the Traffic Overlay — Zone 1 District. The South Burlington Development Review Board will be reviewing the sketch plan for the proposed project at its meeting on December 21, 2004. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on November 12, 2004 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Requirements R7-NC Zoning District qIuir6d1 Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 39,500 SF �1 Max. Building Coverage 40% 6.1 % Max. Overall Coverage 70% 56% ♦ Min. Front Setback 30 ft. 23 ft. Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a ♦ Min. Rear Setback 65 ft. 40 ft. 4 Max. Front Yard Coverage(s) 30% 53.5%; 45.5% 4 Max. Building Height 40 ft. 30 ft. zoning compliance ♦ waiver required zoning noncomliance Setbacks The proposed project meets the rear setback requirement for the R7-NC Zoning District, as outlined in Table C-2 of the Land Development Regulations, but does not meet the 65' setback requirement from a residential district boundary, as required pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(1) of the Land Development Regulations. The subject lot is triangular and has frontage on two (2) public street, therefore it does not have a rear yard. The front setback is violated by the existing canopy structure. Staff estimates the front yard setback at approximately 23'. However, the canopy will remain unchanged, so the setback encroachment will not be made worse by the proposed project. Pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(2) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board may permit new or expanded non-residential uses within the 65' setback, and may approve CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\preliminary doc a modification of the width of the required setback and/or landscaped buffer. In doing so, the Development Review Board shall find that the proposed lighting, landscaping, and/or fencing to be provided adjacent to the boundary of the residential district will provide equivalent screening of the noise, light, and visual impact of the new non-residential use to that which would be provided by the standard setback and buffer requirements. However, in no case may the required side or rear setback be reduced below the standard requirement for the zoning district in which the non- residential use is located. The applicant has proposed to plant seven (7) Austrian Pines, twelve (12) White Cedars, and two (2) Canadian Hemlocks along the rear of the proposed building, which staff feels will provide sufficient screening to justify the encroachment into the standard 65' wide buffer. In addition, the applicant submitted a lighting point -by -point plan that indicates that the proposed lighting levels along the rear property line, adjacent to the existing residential neighborhood will be 0.0 foot candies. Front Yard Coverage Pursuant to Section 3.06(H) of the Land Development Regulations, no more than 30% of the required front setback shall be used for driveways and parking and the balance shall be suitably landscaped and maintained in good appearance. The plans indicate that the existing front yard coverage along Kennedy Drive is 45% and the existing front yard coverage along Hinesburg Road is 44.8%, both of which exceed the current limits as set forth in the Land Development Regulations. The plans indicate that the proposed front yard coverage along Kennedy Drive is increasing to 53.5% and the proposed front yard coverage along Hinesburg Road is increasing to 45.5%, both of which increase the severity of noncompliance. 1. The plans shall be revised to reduce the proposed front yarn coverages, so that they do not exceed the current front yard coverages along Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road, prior to submittal of the final plat application. Traffic Overlay District — Zone 1 Pursuant to Section 10.02(G) of the Land Development Regulations, a property in Zone 1 of the Traffic Overlay District can generate up to 15 peak hour trip ends per 40,000 square feet of land area. The subject property contains approximately 39,500 square feet of land area. The subject property has an existing traffic budget of 146 P.M. peak -hour vehicle trip ends. The applicant has demonstrated to the City, through an amended traffic impact study, that the proposed project's estimated traffic generation will be within the 146 vte budget for the subject property (see enclosed). 2. Prior to preliminary plat approval, the applicant should submit a traffic impact study that indicates that the proposed project will generate less vehicle trip ends than the 146 that the property is currently budgeted. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the Land Development Regulations the Development Review Board shall consider the following in its review of subdivision and Planned Unit Development (PUD) applications: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\prelimina!y doc Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must obtain final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 3. Occupancy shall not take place in the proposed building until the applicant has obtained final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 4. The South Burlington Water Department shall review and comment on the plans, prior to final approval. 5. If needed, the applicant shall obtain wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to final approval. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the DRB may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 6. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. In making this finding the DRB may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. Access to the property will remain via one (1) 36' wide ingress and egress curb -cut off of Kennedy Drive, one (1) 20' wide ingress only curb -cut off of Kennedy Drive, and one (1) 36' wide ingress and egress curb -cut off of Hinesburg Road. Circulation appears to be sufficient within this site. At this time no traffic management strategies are proposed. 7. The applicant shall submit, with the final plat application, a list of any traffic mitigation measures being implemented through the proposed project. At the meeting on December 16, 2003, the Development Review Board requested that the applicant explore the possibility, in conjunction with the Director of the South Burlington Public Works Department, of eliminating one (1) of the curb -cuts on Kennedy Drive. The applicant did contact the Public Works Department about this issue. In a memorandum dated January 8, 2004 (attached), Bruce Hoar, the Director of Pubic Works, stated that the design that the applicant has proposed for this site has been incorporated into the plans for the Kennedy Drive Project, and therefore design changes to the applicant's site plan are not warranted. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\preliminary doc The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. In making this finding the DRB shall utilize the provisions of Article 12 of these Regulations related to wetlands and stream buffers, and may seek comment from the Natural Resources Committee with respect to the project's impact on natural resources. There are no wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, or unique natural features on the site. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff believes the proposed development is in keeping with the goals for development within the Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial (R7-NC) District, as set forth in Section 4.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided. 8. The South Burlington Fire Chief should review and comment on the plans prior to final approval. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. The plans depict a 5' wide pedestrian path connecting the subject property to the property to the northwest. The City Engineer reviewed the plans for the proposed project and provided comments in a memorandum dated December 16, 2004 (attached). Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The City Engineer reviewed the plans for the proposed project and provided comments in a memorandum dated December 16, 2004. 9. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\preliminary.doc The applicant submitted a lighting point -by -point plan that is in compliance with Appendix A.9 and A.10 of the Land development Regulations. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the project is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Regulations for the R7-NC Zoning District. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movemen4 and adequate parking areas. According to Table 13-1 of the Land Development Regulations, a service station with a convenience store requires ten (10) parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA), and short order restaurant requires twelve (12) parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. Thus, the proposed project will require twenty-eight (28) parking spaces. The plans currently depict twenty-nine (29) parking spaces. The proposed parking spaces are in conformance with Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. The plans depict a bicycle rack. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. There are parking spaces located in the front of the proposed building and on the sides of the proposed building. Staff feels the parking space layout is sufficient to meet this requirement. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district; the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. Staff feels the height and scale of the proposed building are compatible with the site and the existing buildings in the area. The height of the building will be approximately 30' and will not exceed the portion of the building that is already present. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\preliminary.doc The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Architectural details were submitted by the applicant and staff feels that this requirement is being met. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed project is located in the R7-NC Zoning District and related harmoniously to the existing buildings, roads, and terrain in the area. Staff feels the proposed building relates harmoniously to the site and the existing buildings in the area. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The subject property is a comer lot with frontage on two (2) public streets. It is abutted by a residential development to the northwest. Staff does not see it necessary to require any access or access easements to the abutting property. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans depict a dumpster for the subject property, which is adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements The applicant has stated that the proposed project will cost approximately $300,000. Pursuant to Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project has a minimum landscaping requirement of $8,500. The applicant is proposing $8,300, which staff feels is sufficient. However, the applicant did not submit a landscape budget prepared by a landscape professional. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\preliminary doc 10. The applicant shall submit, with the final plat application, a landscape budget prepared by a landscape professional indicating that the minimum landscape requirement is being met. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans depict adequate snow storage areas. Lighting The applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the parking lot lighting fixtures, which are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. Other At the meeting on December 16, 2003, the Development Review Board asked the applicant to meet with the abutting neighbors in the Manner Woods Condominiums to make sure they were aware of the project and to address any of their major concerns at an early stage in the project. The applicant has stated that he met with the neighbors and that they did not have any major concerns to be addressed at this time. A representative from the Manner Woods Condominiums was at the meeting on February 3, 2004. It is staff's opinion that this was a sufficient effort to address the Development Review Board's request at this stage of the review process, as the abutting neighbors have been formerly invited to the preliminary and final plat hearings. 11. No exterior storage outside of the approved screened dumpster storage area shall be permitted. In addition, exterior product display shall not be permitted. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" Section of this report to the satisfaction of Staff prior to submittal of the preliminary plat plans. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Paul Wamsganz, applicant 6 EXTENDED POLE MOUNT-� k305 imirn AREA CUTOFF FLOG' Ballast Housing Reflector Seamless, Specular hammertone wrapper die-cast aluminum with semi-specular sides"""°. Capacitor Finish color bronze R Ignitor (Where required) 6" (152 mm) ❑ 12" (305 mm) a —Lamp ® (Included) t: 5" (127 mm) 0 — Lampholder I Cord 24" (610 mm) long Extended Ballast Notes Pole Mount Compartment `-- — Lens Frame Finish color: bronze Cover Die-cast aluminum door frame secures Patented lens; sealed with Hinge silicone gasket Assembly Finish color: black PULSE START METAL HALIDE I __ SPEC 125W PSMH MAC2612 (a)(b) s1'Eca 15OW PSMH MAC2615-(a)(b) _ METAL HALIDE 0 SPEC# 5OW MH _ MAC2405-(a)(b) srr;C # 70W MH _ MAC2407-(a)(b) SPEC # 10OW MH MAC2410-(a)(b) 0 SPEC# 175W MH MAC2417-(a)(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 8 SPEC14Y 35W HPS MAC2503-(a)(b) SPEC# 50W HPS MAC2505-(a)(b) SPEC 70W HPS MAC2507-(a)(b) F cu 100W HPS MAC2510-(a)(b) C] SPEC #15OW HPS MAC2515-(a)(b) Specffy (a) voltage & (b) Options. I t 600 forward throw sharp cutoff luminaire for HID lamp, totally enclosed. Housing is seamless, die-cast aluminum. Mounting consists of a 1.8' (44 mm) wide by 2.5" (64 mm) high by 6" (152 mm) long extruded aluminum arm. The arm is held in place with two 3/8" (9 mm) mounting rods fastened to a steel backing plate inside the pole, and by two nuts inside the fixture housing. Mounting rods are provided with sealing washers to prevent water leakage. Lens assembly consists of rigid aluminum frame and high -impact, clear -tempered glass. D 120/277V (Standard:125W PSMH; 50 —10OW MH; 50W HPS) M 120/208/240/277V _ (Standard: 15OW PSMH; 175W MH; 70 7150W HPS) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (Standard:150W PSMH; 70 —175W MH; _ _70 —15OW HPS) 1 120V (Standard: 35W HPS) 2 277V - -- 27 277V Reactor (15OW PSMH only) 3 208V 4 240V 5 480V (175W MH; 70 -15OW HPS) _ 6 347V (Canada Only) For voltage availability outside the US and Canada, see Bulletin TD-g or contact your Ruud Lighting authorized International Distdbutor. Fixture includes clear, medium -base lamp. Pulse -rated porcelain enclosed, 4kv-rated screw - shell -type lampholder. Lamp ignitor included where required. All ballast assemblies are high - power factor and use the following circuit types: Reactor (277V PSMH) 15OW PSMH Reactor 120V: 35 -150W HPS HX — High Reactance 5 OPTIONS I 1 -(a)F __Fusing -(a)P Button Photocell -513 _ Photocell (for 480V) 0 _External _ quartz Standby (includes 10OW quartz lamp) (N/A on 277V Reactor) Specify (a) Single voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key F,.. ll Exclusive DeltaGuard® finish features an E-coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra -durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven- year limited warranty. US 4,689,729 0 -100W MH, 50 -150W HPS r,. -p ,..r s p� CWA — Constant Wattage Autotransformer 1 Gu 125 & 150W PSMH; 175W MH -- SBL-12 Backlight Shield Hall ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in US and Canada for wet locations and enclosure classified IP65 per IEC 529 and IEC 598. ° 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406-3772 USA PHONE (262) 886-1900 FAX (262) 884-3309 KU U D OO Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA wwwruudligMing.com 1Z'11/03 LIGHTING 6"EXTL POLE MOUNT t rt I AREA GUTOFF FLOOD EPA RATING Isofootcandle plots show initial Footcandles at grade. (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) EPA 0.60 for single fixture with 0° tilt (Consult factory for EPA rating on multiple units). Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 10695 Candlepower distribution curve of 175W MH Rectangular Area Cutoff Floodlight, with back- light shield located for backlight cutoff. Lighting Sciences Inca Certified Test Report No. LSI 11233 Candlepower distribution curve of 150W HPS Rectangular Area Cutoff Floodlight, with back- light shield located for backlight cutoff. 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 80' 60, 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80, 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 0 m 6.1 12.2 18-3 24.4 80 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60'. 80, Isofootcandle plot of 175W MH Area Cutuff Floodlight at 15' (4.6 m) mounting height, 0° vertical tilt, with backlight shield located for backlight cutoff. (Plan view) 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 0 m 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' -1-I_-L-� a S - ■ Isofootcandle plot of 150W HPS Area Cutoff Floodlight at 15' (4.6 m) mounting height, 0` vertical tilt, with backlight shield located for backlight cutoff. (Plan view) 8080' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 0 no 6.1 122 %3 24.4 Isolootcandle plot of 175W MH Area Cutoff Floodlight at 20' (6.1 m) mounting height, 0" vertical tilt, with backlight shield located for backlight cutoff. (Plan view) 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80, 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 24.4 18.3 121 6.1 0 m 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 Isofootcandle plot of 15OW HPS Area Cutoff Floodlight at 20' (6.1 m) mounting height, 0° vertical tilt, with backlight shield located for backlight cutoff. (Plan view) �x T MST 1 Average Initial Light Levels at Grade Test area is centered within a (16) pole layout. (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) Catalog 6 Lamp Type - Lamp Lumens __----- . - - - Mounting Height Max. Recommended Pole -spacing Footcandles Lux MAC2410-D 10OW MH 8,100 10' (3.0 m) 40' (12.1 m) x 55' (16.7 m) ------ - 4.92 53 15' (4.6 m) 60' (18.3 m) x 85' (25.9 m) 2.04 22 AM 17-M 175W MH 12,000 15' (4.6 m) 60' (18.3 m) x 85' (25.9 m) 3.01 32 20' (6.1 m) 75' (22.9 m) x 110' (33.5 m) 1.81 20 MAC2510-M 10OW HPS 9,500 10' (3.0 m) 40' (12.1 m) x 55' (16.7 m) 5.05 55 15' (4.6 m) 60' (18.3 m) x 85' (25.9 m) 2.08 22 MAC2515-M 15OW HPS 16,000 15' (4.6 m) 60' (18.3 m) x 85' (25.9 m) 3.51 38 20' (6.1 m) _ 75' (22.9 m) x 110' (33.5 m) 2.11 23 RUUD® 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406-3772 USA PHONE (262) 886-1900 FAX 262 884-3309 LIGHTING ( ) © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudhghbng.com 12/11/03 12117,1 2 OD 1_:05 802-879-a060 `RUDELL CI11J5ULTIF i PA6E 02 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) December 16, 2M Ray Belair plmming, and ZLmuag City of South Budint on {75 Dorm Stred South Burlington, `,7 05403 RE: Kenniedy Drive Traffic Dear Ray: teL 802-874-6131 fax 802-879-0060 'N✓Ntiv,truCIGllC0n5Ult. nq com This letter is in response to your request for documentation to shove that the estimated vehicle trip generation for the proposed addition of a sandwich shop to the existing gas station and convenience store will not result in a net increase The existing number of vehicles entering and exiting the site during the PM peak hour is 14& We iu,ve prepared the following calculation of what the building square footage would be required to match the vehicle trip generation (mathematically) for the proposed Kennedy Drive convenience sture/deli with the existing levels. In the report TRIP GEIvER4 ITOArAND DI51RIBG710N A-MALY IS dated June 29, 2004, several properties with the same land use (gas station/wrivenienceJdeii) were studied to determine a trip generation rate for the combination gas station, convenience store, and deli because the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, does not have a similar land use category. Based on the sizes studied, we derived a regression formla which predicts traffic as it relates to building square footage (as required by South Burlington Zoning Regulations) for the proposed use: a# of vehicle trips = (0.0143 1 Square Feet of Store) + I09 Originally, Champlain Oil had proposed a 3,250 square foot store, which we calculated would generate 156 total trips, or 10 new trips, based can dhe regression formula. Using the same equation, if square footage is solved for using the existing number of vehicle trips, 146, the new store should be 2,600 square feet to result in no net increase in traffic. P.Q. Box 308 478 Nair Park Read Williston, Vert Veit 05C-5 Civil utginecrtng, surieyins, Land Plannins, vArer and wastewater. Landscape Arehirecturc Roadway Design. Perniitnng 12/17J20e04 11:05 802-879-00ED TRUDELL CDN_ULT:N' ' PAGE 03 If you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, IRLTDELL CONST TLTI ;G ENGNEERS (TCE) ,4b4d A Lisius PTCjea FA&eCr 0C. Pain Wwlsganz LEGEND M.aa.eo , Mliff a PROI0111dD Mum phomm ee 11 LOT SIZE: 46,74J.20 S.F. 1.07 ACRES AND SERVICES ----------- s__________ a VI ZOVE: RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (R7-NC) Ij USE: CONVENIENCE STORE, DELI, GAS CONVENIENCE STORE, GAS STATION WATER MAINS-----_-----e---------- K STATION a: SERVICE GARAGE 8 SUBWAY AND SERVICES 11 FRONT YARD SETBACK: 50 FT. 50 FT. 50 FT STORM DRAINAGE I, SIDE YARD SETBACK: 40 FT. 40 Fr. 65 FT (WAIVER ALLOWED EASTNO 11 (ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE) UNDER PUD) UOUID PROPANE BIAIOM/G 1 FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA: 25,363 S.F. OR NATURAL GAS ____-______p__________ p OVERHEAD POWER ---------- p,p_________ p,p ♦ ;i; .•. -cYv_L DMP Js C1r1FQ►ri. -.: �- 1 - - CABLE /El£VISION ------SIN --------- Cry N`.' \\� \ E'--.!S� ♦` BUILDING' 1,a79 S.F. oR t.o>< 2,94E SF. OR QUO: to% / ' Il ; Ii%q ♦� PAVEMENT /N FRONT YARD SETBACK (KENNEDY DRIVE): 6.Ia6 SF. OR 4&OT 7,685 S.F. OR 515X JOB CTOPOGRAPHIC J (� , {,y PAVEMENT IN FROVi YARD SETBACK (HINESWRC ROAD): 3,J76 S842 F OR 448X 5,467 S.F. OR 45.5% .TOR Y 1 i i f ! I / / �,• 1�T \ ♦♦` BUILDNGT ARK/NC AND ALL OTHER IMMPER ACK LWOUS SURFACES: 20,825 S.F. OR H.81< OR 4aii B,I57 IF. OR 36.0x I52 IF OR 49.9% PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD 1/! i l 1 i f / J /•... _, �. \ ♦` CURB _.. 1`•1 11 `,�, \ ..�\ 5 ♦� PARKPK, SPACES: PROPERTY LINE `1 111 V } \I 1. 6. \\ ♦ Vi 26 SPACES 29 SPACES 27 SPACES BUILDING SETBACKS ______________________ ______________________ BASED ON TAU SF. AND Uf R ORDER RESTAURANT AND \ I �� !1 I I ..,.\ \ \ 1\ I\ V� ,♦♦ -gyp•. "" 2000 S.F. SERVICE STATION � UNE (APPROX.) V [will �\ \\ r`♦ 1 1 ♦`♦` ♦♦ CURB CURS: DRAINAGE FLOW + > > > (� \ .1 ( \ ♦`'♦ ) )•� `♦ HINESBURG ROAD: 36 FT. 36 FT KENNEDY DRIVE: 70 FT 56 FT. \� f I 1 I �, /� / `♦�``♦♦♦ SEWER MANHOLE (SUM) r_ • 1 1 �• \'\) �'. I / ` J/)• / �,`♦ `•. `M♦\`\`` STORM DRAINAGE (DOH)MANHOLE ) • / + SEWER CLEANOUT (00) 1 � / � I! ♦♦��-__._ STIOE RACK ♦♦♦J,♦ STORM DRAINAGE ClEANOUT RAIL 7H CATCH BASIN (CO) ., ■ P RETAll11NG WALL • - r„A 9 -� .�♦ VALVE EMS nNG _ .. ♦♦� CURB STOP (CS) :' e BUILDING r ' \ ♦♦` UNITY POLE 0. PROPOSED Y,V\ ti s.LAVATRAS CARE \ `♦ r A -A- .. �� GUY WIRE w M STORAGE _ \` ♦ A - TRANOR SFORMER C: ■ FFE-9 .865 ♦♦ (210 SF)r 'F PROPOSED 5' FOOTPATH / PROPOSED ! `♦; ♦` "A1' LUMINAORE oQ .• TO CONDOS TO BE - LOCATED OVEN FASTING HVAC UNIT ``V `V`♦ FOOT PATH, SURFACE SNOW FEIICE n,� ` g " \ -' GMP 35 SIGN 4 T M7H 4-6- OF su9PAc >r ar ; I A`b. `♦ sw CHECK OR PLANT MIX .'�� ♦ n \ ••` OAM (TIPIDAI) IRON PIPE (FOUND) • 1 - BIAMI(IT (TTPICAQ / ICE CONTROL PONT w1p♦ i �=. /( i;M GB STEEL REBAR / \ ; CONCRETE MONUMENT (FOUND) 0 '�' EliriM.NlPrr! r I - d' /IIET nkOELL CONSULTING ENGINEER l� (tA00r� I a° s PrroTECT16N 16. s (rcE) vo. ;J- /\ jj ♦ AT POW rS My, EL. 100.38 JUNDER//) �i6. ,A I ' ♦ f 6 \ tR ♦ i e810/e tlt0 15a_ 66yy_ b ` FUEL TANKS D -*roM . ♦ C CN B OTHERS PLANS FOR KENNEDY DRIVE. r `IMPROVEMENTS __. ....... e- • RAPROAD lIE l r ......... .. .... ♦♦ RETAINING WALL C -. $ : \ ` ca 6xTOE Y> . COICRE PAD ♦` i (TYPICAL) �`f:' t ` ♦ ♦ /" r fs.a r r9 , or.� PAVEDAItD PROPOSEDDRIVE � •• w.x x nv I --- ,--------err ,yr ____ RECEIVE D IEEXISTN CANOPY NOV 2 0. _ I --_-4--------- , r GAS ISLAND - .. 47't _____As u rd rr i Rt� \ ♦ - -PP l o ------------ f So BuringtonLOCA7N GMP 36 �•�____ - -— SHRUB BED - 7k 'ONE WAY , . • ` / SHRUB BED EL 9885 .._ -- p---- - --- ~ ----p----------------------- ------------ _- •----------------- ilbT-ai-..-------- ------p---------- --0-------------------------- ------- ___ trr ,WALK PROP�DSEDhUTRE KENSEDY DWM1£ R � „• OTHERS ((AAPPRREAOD YOAFIRE LOCATION) BY a b EXISTING CURBED ISLAND KENNEDY DRIVE S Graphic Scale L E Feet a 20 0 20 40 60 80 1 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 Ndr P•k RDO6 P.O. Bar 308 (BOB) 679-6331(I*—) WiMm, VaID6RS O549S (807J 879-0060*4 Vl* Lb m the lYeb ae—.TnmW..iMg.min na• nAra AM ierAia eaa +ra PIiN• w C011CVNAL APPROVAL MlM"Ott PaSl1MNAlY APPROVAL SUBMISSION ACi 2S0 A0M690N PNAL APPROVAL AlMU SION CONSTRUCTION DaAW1RK8 MID 111111101MVIA »w» em»eemuMa m mt»eM w p.pmrmw q•nnmp A. Imvanm�On bony ut• IV. me awetns w�iwllb. m•r w. nel mM..e.e w nW a».ma. w c»•t.oMmn a»»ny aOr•nNre• M•ow» Aor een•wclmn w• mMpe» Mo » u•» m »pnctbn rR ecnvt a �•„�ypwyleceMbne o•nr/eenv«Mer o».�ae h 4 4• Yel•» e. e1»MYiw. ll,tl w 4 rM 4 M 1%wrw. eMe...�0 MrY >• 4 >• pit 4 W ell-Nm el Tn,ar Cm»IHnY Fnpn.w. I � a h e» er R.» a�a•� e.,•weu•n » m. F» an- »P,»nlmR»�»/Mn.� ,. �,oe,� ..na e•nylw M r.1 • .bp sN ee•b• —1 r .+ wr mes6r a• Dqn •..~r. Dwnp• Mo m. aru.nq. .v..nt ,.+waw...s...bMar 4 .,... ab e•vr �l•m. u. ,n»I I- - ND. Dew�Bm Dale Sjr RevlWarn �i`�tk l� I vER YY��i CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt Sheet TNIe Site Plan Dr-Ar4 Number t 2003007-50 ExOrdlon t I Pwferr A—eff, t •VIP Drawn t RMP Date: 1110512004 F.B. 226 Seale, i' - 20• PTDJect lafaltllDe I XXX X4W: 200300Id, Bads Foe, xxx AppAed SP2 EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BIRLDING Pna�eD euRDra -1 GR GAS ISLAND (TYPICAL) EvsnNG SHRUB BCD TD BE REPLACED WHEN KENNEDY DR1YE IS YWDENED 71,) KENNEDY DRIVE Graphic Scale Feet 20 O 20 401 60 BO 1 ANTS — B PFG 3' O.C. /-19 WPT IS JCFC / 4' aG 4• as 9 PFG 1 i EXISTING CANOPY e4 MC EXISTING CURBED ISLAND PLANT LIST KEY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUANTITY SIZE COMMENTS CSTS CNAENOMELES SPECIOSA DWARF RED QUINCE 21 2 GAL CONT. 'TEXAS SCARLET' CSK CORNUS SENCEA T(ELS: R' COMPACT KELSEY OOGWOW 22 3 GAL CONT. EFSE E'UCHYMUS FORIUNE1'SLYER EDGE' SLYER EDOE WMTERCREEKR 28 3 OAL CONT. JCFC AINIPERUS CMNENSS COMPACT PFITZER JJ NPER 20 5 GAL COLT. PFIR£RIANA COAPACTA JCSO JUNPERUS CMNENSIS SEAGREEN SEAGREEN JUNIPER 13 5 GAL. 00NT. PN PIN/S WGRA AUSTRIAN PINE 7 5' - e' B Q B PFG POTENRLLA FRU17CM 'GOIDSTAR' GOLDSTAR ONOXEFOL IB 3 GAL CONT. OR OUERCUS RUBRA RED OAK 1 2 1/2- - 3' B & B ID INU A OCCIDENTAUS WHITE CEDAR 12 5' - s' B & B TS TSTIGA CANADENSTS CANADIAN HEMLOCK 2 5' - B' B N: B WfT WEIGELA FLORWX 'TANGO' TANGO VeXCLA 19 2 GAL COLT. SO SYMPNORICARPOS OMCULATUS SNOWBERRY 8 5' •PKOP06t'9 PLAN AL— KE_ E Y DRIMI 0Y O1H= CENTVRIDN CRABAPPLE 4 MC MALUS CENTURIp MSP —US 'STRAWBERRY PARFAIT STRAWBERRY PARFAIT CRABAPPLE 4 1+ n 9fOI7 Trr TRUDELL CONSUMING ENGINEERS ME) 47BN*ftk P, ed P.O.la03M WW879 WJWW1e) vmwwm Vammot am go 87040NOW Tea- weeee.neustAwwgAmt RNIM RM, Ae WINTAY hCW M rmlat aW 11010 WL ARRIVAL tleMteMON IReBYIARY ARRIVAL Y�MQYDN ACT m summosm Fll"L ARRIVAL McMSSM C014TRUCTIDN I11LA%mm e�tu.nbn Pwl�i � aW�pYim. uriii � mM��YNw t s.� w rot Mrre m and 6e.Wae a <mmunWn arwge 1 LYmegG rare] b eanGW<Um oG int+Mea b m uma W �� IY aW w M N�wvaioiM�eNn�otl�rRlMspY wam � la gwAo b Yr wl.n. rr.re w eWee.r.a Wier ca b M eeY�w ter : o Min.:°". smnw r>eo-•"� t�"°mturuo w(v.'�I.a�in. a•eY nmiw ebb sd IooO gprow. a Yuwn.nt T�glnerloe ew remlre W erol.. carol meAmr rble! YY RmaEs by Ms Pert% O�mPe le Me trwM rArY�er. Na Deta411Qn Date h la9bbrr `�� `yP r. * NO. 8104 * _ O CIVIL Project Tme CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt Shoot TWA Landscape Plan Dhed M NUMbet t 200J007-51 FJdumdorh t 1 PmJec mrMder t UPP DiwNR t RMP Ddli t 11/05/2004 F.111.226 Scdo t i' - 20' Fmfect LlEMalpt xxx X4Ws 2003007Gc Belch File, xxx Approved SP3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: December 14, 2004 \drb\sub\champlain_oil\sketch.doc Plans received: November 12, 2004 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT— 110 KENNEDY DRIVE SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-04-85 Agenda #7 Meeting Date: December 21, 2004 Owner Applicant C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership Champlain Oil Company, Inc. c/o Champlain Oil Company, Inc. PO Box 2126 PO Box 2126 S. Burlington, VT 05407 S. Burlington, VT 05407 Engineer/Desi_mer Propertv Information Paul E. Wamsganz Tax Parcel 0970-00110-C Champlain Oil Company, Inc. Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial P.O. Box 2126 (R7-NC) District-, Traffic Overlay District — Zone S. Burlington, VT 05407 5 District ± 0.9 Acres Location Map va" •;.. 4e . �+ .. r r. . a rya{. " ' ,►+ t ;�,.igy�i�,��#.i k CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champIain oiksketch doc Champlain Oil Company, Inc., hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing an existing 1,775 square foot service station with a convenience store building and 2) constructing a 2,600square foot convenience store with short order restaurant having 20 seats in conjunction with a service station use consisting of four (4) pumps (8 fueling positions) and a 2,200 square foot canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive. The subject property contains approximately 0.9 acres and is located in the Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial (R7-NC) District and the Traffic Overlay — Zone 1 District. The South Burlington Development Review Board reviewed the sketch plan for the proposed project at its meeting on February 3, 2004 (minutes enclosed). However, the applicant did not submit a preliminary plat application within the required six (6) month period, so they were required to re -submit a sketch plan application. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on November 12, 2004 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Re uirements R7-NC Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 39,500 SF Max. Building Coverage 40% 6.1 % Max. Overall Coverage 70% 56% ♦ Min. Front Setback 30 ft. 23 ft. �l Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a ♦ Min. Rear Setback 65 ft. 40 ft. 4 Max. Front Yard Coverage(s) 30% 53.5%; 45.5% � Max. Building Height 40 ft. 30 ft. �l zoning compliance ♦ waiver required A zoning noncomliance Setbacks The proposed project meets the rear setback requirement for the R7-NC Zoning District, as outlined in Table C-2 of the Land Development Regulations, but does not meet the 65' setback requirement from a residential district boundary, as required pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(1) of the Land Development Regulations. The subject lot is triangular and has frontage on two (2) public street, therefore it does not have a rear yard. The front setback is violated by the existing canopy structure. Staff estimates the front yard setback at approximately 23'. However, the canopy will remain unchanged, so the setback encroachment will not be made worse by the proposed project. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drMsuMchamplain oil\sketch doc Pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(2) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board may permit new or expanded non-residential uses within the 65' setback, and may approve a modification of the width of the required setback and/or landscaped buffer. In doing so, the Development Review Board shall find that the proposed lighting, landscaping, and/or fencing to be provided adjacent to the boundary of the residential district will provide equivalent screening of the noise, light, and visual impact of the new non-residential use to that which would be provided by the standard setback and buffer requirements. However, in no case may the required side or rear setback be reduced below the standard requirement for the zoning district in which the non- residential use is located. 1. Pursuant to Section 3.06(l)(2) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit, with the next plan submittal, evidence that the proposed lighting, landscaping, and/or fencing to be provided adjacent to the boundary of the residential district will provide equivalent screening of the noise, light, and visual impact of the new non-residential use to that which would be provided by the standard setback and buffer requirements . Front Yard Coverage Pursuant to Section 3.06(H) of the Land Development Regulations, no more than 30% of the required front setback shall be used for driveways and parking and the balance shall be suitably landscaped and maintained in good appearance. The plans indicate that the existing front yard coverage along Kennedy Drive is 45% and the existing front yard coverage along Hinesburg Road is 44.8%, both of which exceed the current limits as set forth in the Land Development Regulations. The plans indicate that the proposed front yard coverage along Kennedy Drive is 53.5% and the proposed front yard coverage along Hinesburg Road is 45.5%, both of which increase the severity of noncompliance. Staff notes the original sketch plans indicated that the existing front yard coverages would be reduced through the proposed project, which doesn't not appear to be the case according to these plans. 2. The applicant shall provide clarification regarding the existing front yard coverages and proposed front yard coverages along Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive, prior to preliminary plat approval. 3. The plans should be revised to make all reasonable attempts to reduce the front yard coverages to come into closer conformance with Section 3.06(H) of the Land Development Regulations , prior to the next submittal of plans. Traffic Overlay District — Zone 1 Pursuant to Section 10.02(G) of the Land Development Regulations, a property in Zone 1 of the Traffic Overlay District can generate up to 15 peak hour trip ends per 40,000 square feet of land area. The subject property contains approximately 39,500 square feet of land area. Thus, the property may generate a maximum of 14.8 P.M. peak hour trip ends. According to the ITE 6`h Edition, the existing use on the property generates approximately (1,775 square feet x 96.37 trip ends) 171 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The applicant should submit information on the allocated square footage for the convenience store portion of the proposed building vs. the short-order restaurant portion of the proposed building. In addition, the applicant shall submit information regarding the number of seats the proposed short- order restaurant will contain. These numbers will allow staff to accurately calculate the traffic impacts of the proposed use. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch doc 4. The applicant should submit, with the next plan submittal, information on the allocated square footage for the convenience store portion of the proposed building vs. the short-order restaurant portion of the proposed building. In addition, the applicant should submit information regarding the number of seats the proposed short-order restaurant will contain. In addition, staff feels the applicant should submit a traffic impact study that analyzes the traffic impacts of the proposed project with two scenarios. The first scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the roads as they exist today. The second scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the proposed median on Kennedy Drive, which would prohibit left-hand turns in and out of the subject property at the easterly most curb -cut on Kennedy Drive. The Development Review Board asked the applicant, at the December 16, 2003 meeting, to submit traffic counts and/or a traffic impact study for the subject property. The applicant will present traffic count data from a property in a neighboring community with the same use to the Development Review Board at the meeting on February 3, 2004. Staff feels this is sufficient for the sketch plan review of this project, but that more detailed information will be necessary prior to preliminary approval. 5. The applicant should submit, with the next plan submittal, a traffic impact study that analyzes the traffic impacts of the proposed project with two scenarios. The first scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the roads as they exist today. The second scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the proposed median on Kennedy Drive. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the Land Development Regulations the Development Review Board shall consider the following in its review of subdivision and Planned Unit Development (PUD) applications: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must obtain final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 6. Occupancy shall not take place in the proposed building until the applicant has obtained final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 7. The South Buffington Water Department shall review and comment on the plans, prior to final approval. 8. If needed, the applicant shall obtain wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to final approval. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oiksketch doc DRB may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. In making this finding the DRB may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. Access to the property will remain via the existing two (2) 34' wide curb -cuts off of Kennedy Drive and the one (1) 42' wide curb -cut off of Hinesburg Road. Pursuant to Section 15.12(D) of the Land Development Regulations, staff recommends that this curb -cut be reduced to the maximum allowed width of 36'. Circulation appears to be sufficient within this site. At this time no traffic management strategies are proposed. However, staff has suggested that the applicant submit a traffic impact study with next plan submittal. Any traffic management strategies that are recommended through that traffic study should be incorporated into the plans. At the meeting on December 16, 2003, the Development Review Board requested that the applicant explore the possibility, in conjunction with the Director of the South Burlington Public Works Department, of eliminating one (1) of the curb -cuts on Kennedy Drive. The applicant did contact the Public Works Department about this issue. In a memorandum dated January 8, 2004 (attached), Bruce Hoar, the Director of Pubic Works, stated that the design that the applicant has proposed for this site has been incorporated into the plans for the Kennedy Drive Project, and therefore design changes to the applicant's site plan are not warranted. 10. The plans should be drawn to scale for the next plan submittal The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. In making this finding the DRB shall utilize the provisions of Article 12 of these Regulations related to wetlands and stream buffers, and may seek comment from the Natural Resources Committee with respect to the project's impact on natural resources. There are no wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, or unique natural features on the site. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning districts) in which it is located. Staff believes the proposed development is in keeping with the goals for development within the Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial (R7-NC) District, as set forth in Section 4.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oiksketch.doc Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Staff feels this requirement is met The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided. 11. The South Burlington Fire Chief should review and comment on the plans prior to final approval. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. The plans depict existing pedestrian paths connecting the subject property to the property to the northwest. Staff is concerned that these paths, although desirable for pedestrian access, will create openings in the vegetated buffer, thereby reducing its effectiveness as a buffer. Since the applicant is requesting to place the proposed building 25' closer to the property boundary than allowed, the Development Review Board should weigh the impact of these pedestrian paths. 12. The applicant should include stormwater, sidewalk, landscaping, utility line, and lighting details with the next plan submittal. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Again, the applicant should include stormwater, sidewalk, landscaping, utility line, and lighting details with the next plan submittal. The City Engineer reviewed the sketch plans for the proposed project and provided comments in a letter dated November 26, 2003 (attached). 13. The applicant should revise the plans to comply with the City Engineer's comments, as outlined in his letter dated November 26, 2003, prior to submittal of the next plans. 14. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Pursuant to Appendix A.9 of the Land Development Regulations, luminaries shall not be placed more than 30' above ground level and the maximum illumination at ground level shall not exceed an average of three (3) foot candles. Pursuant to Appendix A.10(b) of the Land Development Regulations, indirect glare produced by illumination at ground level shall not exceed 0.3 foot candles maximum, and an average of 0.1 foot candles average. 15. The applicant shall submit a lighting point by point plan with the next plan submittal CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\chamglain oil\sketch doc The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the project is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Regulations for the R7-NC Zoning District. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. According to Table 13-1 of the Land Development Regulations, a service station with a convenience store requires ten (10) parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). The plans currently depict twenty-nine (29) parking spaces. The applicant should submit information on the size of the convenience store vs. the size of the short-order restaurant, so that the parking requirement for the project can be accurately calculated. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. No bicycle parking facilities are shown for the site. 16. The applicant should submit information on the size of the convenience store vs. the size of the short-order restaurant, so that the parking requirement for the project can be accurately calculated. 17. The proposed parking spaces should be in conformance with Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. 18. The plans should be revised to depict a bicycle parking facility, prior to submittal of the next plans. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable There are parking spaces located in the front of the proposed building and on the sides of the proposed building. Staff feels the parking space layout is sufficient to meet this requirement. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. Staff feels the height and scale of the proposed building are compatible with the site and the existing buildings in the area. The height of the building will be approximately 30' and will not exceed the portion of the building that is already present. 19. Building elevation plans of the proposed building should be submitted with the next plan submittal. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch.doc Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Architectural details were not submitted by the applicant. 20. Architectural details of the proposed building should be submitted with the next plan submittal. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed project is located in the R7-NC Zoning District and related harmoniously to the existing buildings, roads, and terrain in the area. Staff feels the proposed building relates harmoniously to the site and the existing buildings in the area. It is staff's opinion that the subject property would relate more harmoniously to the Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive if the front yard coverage was reduced to come into closer compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The subject property is a comer lot with frontage on two (2) public streets. It is abutted by a residential development to the northwest. Staff does not see it necessary to require any access or access easements to the abutting property. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oiksketch.doc The plans do not depict a dumpster(s) for the subject property. 21. The plans shall be revised to clearly depict the location and screening of any proposed dumpsters or other facilities to handle solid waste, prior to the next submittal of plans. Landscaping and Screening Requirements 22. The applicant should submit a landscape plan and a landscape budget with the next plan submittal. This landscape plan and budget should be in compliance with Sections 13.06(F) and 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two and one-half (2.5) inches when measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of planting, shall be provided within each parking area for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of paved area or every ten (10) parking spaces, whichever is greater. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans revised on November 14, 2003 depict adequate snow storage areas. 23. The plans shall be revised to come into compliance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, prior to the next plan submittal. 24. The City Arborist should review and provide comments on the plans prior to final approval Other At the meeting on December 16, 2003, the Development Review Board asked the applicant to meet with the abutting neighbors in the Manner Woods Condominiums to make sure they were aware of the project and to address any of their major concerns at an early stage in the project. The applicant has stated that he met with the neighbors and that they did not have any major concerns to be addressed at this time. There is a possibility that a representative from the Manner Woods Condominiums will be at the meeting on February 3, 2004. It is staff's opinion that this was a sufficient effort to address the Development Review Board's request at this stage of the review process, as the abutting neighbors will be formerly invited to the preliminary and final plat hearings. 25. No exterior storage outside of the approved screened dumpster storage area shall be permitted. In addition, exterior product display shall not be permitted. 26. The preliminary plans should include a perimeter survey of the property. 27. The preliminary plans should note the zoning district boundaries. 28. Pursuant to Section 14.05(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the site plan shall be prepared by a registered architect, licensed landscape architect, licensed land surveyor, licensed engineer, or professional land planner. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 10 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch doc Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" Section of this report to the satisfaction of Staff prior to submittal of the preliminary plat plans. Respectful[ submitted, Brian Roberts , Associate Planner Copy to: Paul Wamsganz, applicant DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 FEBRUARY 2004 7. Site Plan Application 9SP-04-01 of William A. Burnett to amend a previously approved site plan for a 2,000 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting 400 sq. ft. to medical office, 1996 Williston Road: The applicant had no issues with the staff comments or with the draft motion. He did note that the correct address for this particular office is 2002 Williston Road. Mr. Belair said he will check on this as a matter of record. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plat Application #SP-04-01 of William A. Burnett subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Sketch plan application #SD-03-84 of Barbara Neff to subdivide a 16.3 acre parcel into two lots of 0.51 acres (lot A) and 15.79 acre (lot B), 700 Hinesburg Rd: Question of access to lot B was raised. Mr. Belair said chances are that there will be future development, and the road will become a public road. He noted that Pizzagalli has control over that. Mr. Dinklage said Pizzagalli is aware of the situation. He added that the Board would prefer that any development on the applicant's lot access off the new road. He asked whether the applicant has any idea when they will be coming in with development plans. The applicant said possibly within a year or so. Mr. Dinklage noted the need to get the wetlands assessed by a wetlands expert and also the need to talk with the Rec Path Committee to get their thoughts. Mr. Kupferman asked how many units would be allowed on lot B. Mr. Belair said 4 per acre with a PUD. The question of combining preliminary and final plats was raised. Mr. Belair had no problem as this is a minor subdividion. 9. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-03-76 of Champlain Oil Company for a planned unit development consisting of. 1) razing an existing 1775 sq. ft. service station with convenience store building, and 2) constructing a 3000-4000 sq. ft. convenience store with a short order restaurant having an unknown number of seats in conjunction with a service station use consisting of four pumps (8 fueling positions) and a 2200 sq. ft. canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Mitchell of Champlain Oil distributed information to the Board. He showed plans of the existing conditions and the proposed plan. He also noted that since the last presentation, the M,= DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 FEBRUARY 2004 applicant has met with the Homeowners Association of the adjoining residential complex. Plans were reviewed at that meeting and a number of concerns were expressed. The plan being presented reflects changes resulting from meeting with the residents: 1. The setback at the back of the building has been increased from 40' to 50'. 2. On the Hinesburg Rd. Side, 27 ft. of parking has been eliminated and made into green space (this was shown on the plan). 3. Parking spaces were relocated (shown on the plan). 4. In the area between this property and Manor Woods a berm has been added to keep headlights from shining into residences. 5. The building size will be 3100 sq. ft. with 16-20 restaurant seats. There will be 31 parking spaces provided, including spaces at the pumps. Mr. Dinklage noted the Board will be hard pressed to approve an increase in building size since the existing coverage is already exceeded. The applicant noted their sales volume is going down. Mr. Dinklage said there is no assurance that it will not go up again. Mr. Belair stressed that trip generation numbers are based on the use. Mr. Dinlage added the DRB is bound to follow those guidelines. He said it is possible the applicant will have to make adjustments to keep within the existing limits. Regarding traffic, Mr. Belair said the Board can require that the applicant do a trip generation analysis and can also invoke technical review and have the city hire someone to do this at the applicant's expense. He felt the Board needs a professional review of traffic. The applicant said they have a similar use in Essex Junction and the traffic from the Subway use does not conflict with AM or PM peak hour traffic. He asked if the Board can make adjustments to the traffic overlay. Mr. Dinklage said it can if there are significant improvements made to traffic flow on the site. He noted that the site presently generates 171 PM peak hour trips. An audience member noted that people use the gas station as a cut -through to avoid the light at Kennedy Drive /Hinesburg Rd. intersection. Mr. Dinklage said that is illegal and is very dangerous. Members then considered the width of curb cuts. Mr. Belair noted that this is measured from the property line. Mr. Dinklage suggested reducing the radius on the Hinesburg Rd. side to add more green space since trucks only turn left from that curb cut. The applicant said they would consider that as it seemed reasonable. Mr. Belair noted that the maximum allowable width for a curb cut - 5 - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 FEBRUARY 2004 is 36 feet measured at the property line. A neighbor noted that her bedroom is adjacent to this property and she hears a lot of noise. She asked that existing trees not be removed since that would make it worse. The applicant said none of those trees will be removed. The neighbor said the proposed building will be 10 feet closer. Mr. Dinklage asked where loading/unloading will take place with the new building. The applicant said 90% will be at the front door whereas with the current building 90% is done through the back. Mr. Dinklage said that is important for neighbors, although the tankers will still be coming to the same place. The applicant said the trash/lawn equipment shed will be moved 10 ft. further from the property line with the neighbors. Mr. Dinklage asked what will be in the green area where the shed currently is. The applicant said "whatever it takes". Mr. Dinklage asked about the existing footpath. The applicant showed the location and said they will keep it if the neighbors want it. Mr. Dinklage asked how high the berm will be. The applicant said it will be 2 feet higher than the existing area with a 6 foot hedge on top. Mr. Dinklage suggested a berm where the existing shed is located in order to block noise. The applicant said they can do that. Mr. Belair suggested there be a condition that the dumpster pick-up not be allowed before 7 a.m. This has been done in other locations where a residential neighborhood borders a commercial use. Mr. Dinklage noted that if the noise becomes worse, the Board can take action. He cited the Hannaford situation where a noise -blocking fence was required. An audience member questioned whether there could be a requirement for only right turns in at the Hinesburg Rd. curb cut. She cited the back-up in traffic waiting for left turners into the applicant's property. The applicant did not feel that was workable. Mr. Dinklage suggested that the easternmost access on Kennedy Drive become an entrance only, right turn in. With the new median on Kennedy Drive, this would help to move traffic. He felt the entrance could be contoured and curbed to make it obviously an entrance only. The applicant was not receptive to that idea since they now have something that works and don't want to give it up. Mr. Dinklage raised the issue of landscaping in the parking areas. Mr. Belair said there are some islands that would be appropriate for landscaping. A brief review was made of things for the applicant to consider. - 6 - CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY CONVENIENCE STORE 8. SUBWAY RESTAURANT EXPANSION KENNEDY DRIVE & U.S. ROUTE 116 (HINESBURG ROAD) SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Location Drawing Index OSPI Ortho Site Plan EC1 Existing Conditions SP1 Demolition Plan SP2 Site Plan SP3 Landscape Plan D1 Construction Details D2 Construction Details D3 Construction Details Project: CONVENIENCE STORE & SUBWAY RESTAURANT EXPANSION Owner: CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY, INC. P.O. BOX 2126, SOUTH BLB mwoN. VT omm (802) 864-53w Engineer: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. BOX 308. 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD, WB.LISTON. VT 05495 (802) 879-6331 (TTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGME.RS (TCE MU MA16 AIL AUMU ,OL TK N,OQ Oh CONCEPTUAL PLANS PRUJM94ARY PLANS ACT 240 SIMATLSAON FINAL PLANS CONSTRUCTION DRAW01Cd LNOIIL U!q n6K MI6 MNKM TMAT YOU IIAK TI6 LA76LT L6VSDM LAST RLVBEA 11/05/2004 TCE PROJECT NO. 2003007 S.\-TCE WAVME\2003\2003W7\2003007-0ld.. 11/I1/2004 4-01,13 " EST PA" \ a \ ♦tea �\ . ---------- -� - ----------- Y yy-- \ \4 t T KEAMDY DRIVE 0 El r-, Ce RIM-86.80 11 11 - Ti EXISTING I" BUILDING 1 .¢ 1 Y GMP J, Tom \ .. (;;..I - h r T ` PTV ,\ � sue.-....—_.—/ i -•_, .. `§iT1RACf BUILDING ' I ' 100 SO. FT. i 4b• 1 : ICE PT .7 EL. 100.36 / 'off r I � 1 I I s ,, I i MIXED TREES I'm PAL 4 IR 1 ----- Qaphlc Scale Feet 20 0 20 40 60 80 RAILROAD TIE RETAINING WALL NORWAY MAPLE NORWAY MAPLE \ - GMP 1 � \ TE'RGROIMD ANkS \ A °A BE SPRUCE CONCRETE PAD � .. CAS ISLAND~— �f I 1 (TYPICAL) SHRUB BED r e M EXISTING T CANOPY LONE °%y'• i TCE PT 2 ( EL. 98.65 ----- - ------ ------ -- --:a ---------------- r / ''O / O / PINE EXISTING BLMDM 1, 750 S0. FT EF.E.-101.0 ,\ ° `L-��C?ETE SIpEWALK �J I ��`-- OBSERVATION j \ WELL (TYPICAL) ) KENNEDY DRIVE ss DROP CURB (TYPICAL) /; / TOP•POOGRAPHIC INFORMATION BASED ON FIELD SURVEY BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. THE ELEVA"ONS ARE BASED ONAN ASSUMED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF 101.0. PRCPERTY LINE INFORMATION FROM U• I7 , RAlLR0A0 TIE 40 RETAINING WALL -- J CRABAPPLE TREE ------ ---- ----- t------ e . EXISTING CURBED ISLAND 06 LEGEND FJUSTM SEWER MAINS -__-_______9___-______ AND SERVICES WATER MAWS AND SERVICES STORM DRAINAGE LIQUID PROPANE _ ------------------- OR NATURAL GAS OVERHEAD POWER ---------- ay__-_-____ UNDERGROUND POWER __________ - --------- CABLE TELEVISION ---------- LTY_________ TOPOGRAPHIC w_.......- _.-..... _.. CONTOURS _--- . -- .... PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD CURB PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACKS TREE LINE (APPROX) DRAINAGE FLOW SEWER MANHOLE (SUN) _ STORM DRAINAGE (DMN) MANHOLE SERER CLEANOUT (CO) STORM DRAINAGE CLEANOUT CATCH BASIN (CB) ., VALVE CURB STOP (CS) a UTILITY POLE �. GUY MRE w UTC OR r TRANSFORMER LUMINAIRE op SIGN Kr OBSERVATION WELL e IRON PIPE (FOUND) • STEEL REBAR PONT CONCRETE MONUMENT (FOUND) 0 TRBDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) • INFORMATION FROM AOT NH 121-1(1) PLANS FOR KENNEDY DRIVE, CONVERTED ®n a TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (fCE) 47811bir Pei Rued P.0.11=301% (80I)VMXl10one) WBIrtML Va11m16 05" 007d 8794MOM W) VI* 1hen the Web a6—.hude aaftSxom CONLPiWL AMROVAL SIINOIgN MISWa1AAY ARROVAL SU MUMN ACT 25U Sl•AY590t1 MKAL AMBOVAL flMLLSSIWI CONSTRUCTION DWAWPIOS m.r .r. , x,-,a.e w M. a c.nmucum Avwwq.. x�w.wa o..oww N. em.woum w n,.re.e ,e a W Hwtwn am a.nue., awum.nLL waaAaa.. eww/mro«tw .p.4ee bM W OAI..�. NM) w dbww M a% wM4 bl'ITh% a. mY teY w el n-e bo+rvYY CanmMwp FP ;�I�TI� Mnw .Mn.ma er. (Y+/M.wnm nNwNMlen M ..u01N iemu 4` :•I °�d,w •nai e. ewwa�.a� a°% w�.w % r.aNw .1a1. aM and apgoW wna. man0.na« ie a: e:e. mNnM >Y a. lnairr • n4 W WaIF .q. Y mlr a m.e. 6 a.i.yW.. mi m=ixmZi. • nym.emy to ...I.. m1...Vr <maM. aw m.n e+♦ 00 ♦S 'EL9tta_ . ND. Dep�llan Dada w BeW1oIo t\\\I1111111b///// ~`p9 OF yER�/A,� * qAL,� i ///+N11111111N11� CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Budington, Vt Shoo TWO Existing Conditions DEawb llIME lber t 2003007-20 FXE0019n , 1 Protect romoa80T: ,PP DIaWn: RMP Dap: /1/06/mI F.B.226 c Scale I" - 20' Pntect Nwloe t xxx X4W(: xxx Belxh Foe - xxx Approved ECI EXISTING BUILDING / RN-86.BD 1; rss 11 ii EXISTINo B(IAGIIIQ 1 1 \ GNP 34 tic; /1 •\ i � 11 i�l ... \ 1 1. { \ r r jillljI _ \\ \ ! / I 1 j I / / / /Y\w •...� `\\ \ RAILROAD TIE ,\\\\`\ RETAINING WALL 1 / / NORWAY MAPLE ' MIXED TREES\ PT I i EL A1 7. .... /... \\ CUR _ .. ✓ �� UAF AC'AroTFDBE l",�•y'y, \ \\ & M /tXlSTING WATiJN- 70 REMOVED OST,nmeu AMu�, 9E EXISTING SEWER / ¢ \\\p��: \ NORWAY TCI BE REMOVED l X .� \ MAPLE l -, ,,,.uaPeAR` .. �`Ld,.-.c FRB \ \\ EXISTING STORAGE ¢ ,) \ TO SE(RENOWD 5 X\ - W4D/NC TO BE SHRUB ro LTE REMOVED GNP 36 DO "�`�-EXISnNO �'P•• / PME TO BE ' (NI REMOVED .. ..r T A•/ tg� UNM)MOUND TO NVAC BC } " ' f RTIOCRELOCATED \ PAl7 \\\ GONCREIE� I I \ ^ \\ a TO BE REMOVED s TCE P7 EXISRNG BUILDING 1_ _ EX�STING'OO 0ww • '.�-' \ 1` \\ 0.. f00 Je ( TO Re REMOA'D ! i sIDEW'jJJ( qU 8E \4. i UNDERGROUND \A\ 1 .'� ..._ FUEL I f ..... I / ;r ( •.\ EXISTING METAL CURB )! I \ I �; UE SPRUCE\\ 1 \ TO BE REMOVED I . � CONCRETE(TYPICAL) ONCRETE PAD .. 1 ./-- - / � TYPICAL ),, \ln d �. __ , I 1 GAS ISLAND � / 9 ' � �`�; � (TYPICAL) _____-___ SHRUB BED I I i / / / 1 9 EXISTING PENT (10 f / / MIXED TREES i /, '/' 'i"-TFJEPHONP - CANOPY �? / PAD TO BE j_... REMOVED i arf : ri\ ; / /.�, IJ@f7 TD BE --- dy RElOCKTED.. REMOTE E765BNG-T___T_______ ,.. �iCE PT 2 i l � R PAVEMENT $ .:' NL ...---- SHRUB BED ..�. ------ - -------------- �---- -- KENNEDY DRIVE Graphic Scale feet 20 0 20 40 60 80 J71 RAILROAD TIE FAO J\ RETAINING WALL ..• a\.\ tir-m.B9 -ab• SHRUB BED\•i 1 _.... _.. CRABAPPLE TREE GMP 36 —CRABAPPLE TREE TO BE REMOVED (BY OTHERS) EXISTING CURBED ISLAND LEGEND Bxarm UAtOVBD SEVER MAINS ANDSERVICES -----------s----------.......... _........... _5............................ WATERMAINS AND REFACES ___-____------------- '--' ................. ....... __.................. ' STORM DRAINAGE ..................... LIQUID PROPANE OR NATURAL GAS -__________o__________ OVERHEAD POWER __________ ww_________ CABLE TELEVISION -__ ___-Cry--------- TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS ..-._ 3 ..._..._... PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD - ---- CURB ..._. . . _............ PROPERTY LINE TREE LINE (APPROX.) ..... ..... :..... ......:. ....:......... DRAINAGE FLOW + SEWER MANHOLE (SLIM) STORM DRAINAGE (OMH) MANHOLE - SEVER CLEANOUT (CO) o STORM DRAINAGE CLEANOUT o CATCH BASIN (CB) [; VALVE N CURB STOP (CS) 4 UnUTY POLE t GUY 1WRE MTC OR TRANSFORMER LUMMAIRE o0 o{;j SIGN p' IRON PIPE (FOUND) O TOE CONTROL POINT STEEL REBAR CONCRETE MONUMENT (FOUND) ■ TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) ►--• `N TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) 478BINr Pert RoeG P.O.B-XS W4879.0311 0.) Wes, V-9 054" (8O2) 879001500w YMB W m tl1e W'W eb wW W.1hgdKer�i�,0orn rMSe MAN{ AWl •RA4 N• M wnlr0• CA CONCEPTUAL APMIOVAL URMNS10N rAeulABUBr AenovAL �uNneloN ACT 2W SUL-AM9ON BNAL AMOVAL A111M158M OoperrR O'1'ION ORAVVN06 �Iw�.s'.. � ml:.lwm ww/,nwy awdea wm.nu- ero• - ewNNaw, a-w,r. —II wwbuollon w Inwaw Io M uwa N ""H�'li.na oo..anww�"wuw.`aweW:°.vnea`mr -. .�0r.ane le m. P.w.l. i.,.d a er ua a nn- smA,wlw� o.me.aw, a m.� wa, m. -�wnM ma (M/w.) raNMC. e Mlen?n,u O Nw .la1Mi anima �Fe•'°� •J Sum IM1 bad epwoM. A. ml aM1wNw qw. GraH,w mC wplw mwwl N yMM ey iM Srn M1W p.0-1% (lpnaw le m. awFw m x i ,wpm.ernY to w-n. i13 aqY omla.,3 m3 mwl i� i• iV i • we L INo Deealptlen DeOe 8Y ItivMlorM RojectEft CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt sheet 7BI. Demolition Plan DBLwIng Number: 2003007-50 ExMAMon: I PNf w n-wa- I ,mP DN : RMP Dllte: 11/05/2004 FJL226/OC Scale: i' - 20' pr*x*rdon TOe: XXX X4W, 2003 07da Bench FA.: XXX Appro✓ed SPI --- - B' DU FILE IRON PIPE FILLED _._.. % METH aASS •B' CONCRETE - (RDUM TOP A$ SHOWN) PAINT POST WN ONE PRIMER COAT AND ONE FINISH COAT. COLOR - YELLOW n / - CUSS - 6,CONCRETE SWPORT SEE SITE PLAN FOR POST LOCATIONS o < H 1 B LLA D N.T.. SAW CUT EASnNG PAVEMENT I' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1/2• NEARING COURSE 2 1/2• BASE COURSE p,y'•�-J' CRIISIIED 01A LEL N RP oQo o•��A��cl'lo O 13' GRAVEL BASE `1p�-. .I�W��; I I 11111111-11111111111111 ��.... _.... 6• SAND BORROW AND CUSHION II -I -III—III—III—III—III—III- —III—III—III—I I COUP CT BACKFILL At AS REMOVED —III —I I III I I I III I I I III I I I I III I I I III I „AIM LIFFTS I I I III I I NOTE: MATCH EXISTING MATERIALS IF GREATER THAN SPECIFIED MATERIALS C21 PAVEMENT CUT 3/4''1'-G' 2001 11TI.K,1 cavM,tTuro ENmNeDez LNG RENr6D OT L-Rsozu �— MEA6NG COURSE (TIC 9U (VAOT 406) -BAY COUPS, (TYPE II) (VAOT M6) CRUSHED GRAVEL (VAOT 7"05) • •• ��//�� •-'6 -- �•B' -_ - �, D',° �--GRAVEL EASE (VAOT 704.04) N•'' �YIRM SOON STABLUZATNW FABRIC INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WM MANUFACTURER•$ RECOMMENDATIONS •.• • $' SAND BORROW AND CUSHION TO . :. • •• ...' . :. • • .. :.' • .. BE USED IN POORLY MARCO SOUS OR OVER BEDROLR (VAC, TOJ.OJ) — U-S_ OR R6UBGRADE n©oao® 000000 ©00000 Nalm 1. SUBBASE SANG CUSHION AND SUB(WADE SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AND COMPACTED TO DE DIMENSIONS SHORN IN ACCORDANCE WN 1fRMowT AGENCY OF MANS TAVON SPEOIiIATIONS STANDARD A-76. WERE MORE STRINGENT LOCAL MOIIANCES HAVE BEEN ADOPTED RELATIVE TO ROAD OWN90VS AND CONSTRUCTOH, THEY SHOMD GOVERN. 2. COMPACT ALL SUBBASE MATERIALS TO 9M MAlOAM IM DEH4TY (STANDARD PROCTOR). 3 IF GROUNDM'AIER OR SOFT SPOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO DISCUSS ADDED WASUAES SUCH AS O.DERMQN WAVY DUTY 3 RANGE INLET FRAME k CRATE, NEENAH R-34OW OR IFBARON 1248-2 1-1/2' - 2• STONE RING RACED AROUND INLET GRADE SLOPE AROUND J STRUCTURE UNIFORMLY MRM 14CN FILTER FABRIC OVER STRUCTURE. UNDER ORATE AND UNDER STOVE L ME SEDIMENT TRAP SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY EXCAVATING A TEMPORARY SUMP AOYCENT TO THE STORM INLET. TW SUMP SHALL HAW A LNMMUM DEPM OF SIX INCHES MEASURED FROM NNE TOP RING OF THE STORM INLET. CUT SLOPES SHALL BE J.I OR RATTER AND STABILIZED MM MULCH TO PREVENT EROSION. 2. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE PRONGED BY WRAPPING MTER FABRIC (NAAFI I40) OVER THE OPENING AND UTLILNG 1-1 2' -2' STONE FOR FILTRATION OF SEDIMENT. 3 ME STRUCTURE SHAVE. BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RANI EVENT AND REPAIRS MADE AS NEEDED. SEZIIM T SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ME TRAP WHEN TALE MATERIAL HAS ACCUI/—TED TO WHIN 4. OF THE INLET SEOWENT SHALL BE SPREAD OVER STABILIZED AREAS ON SLOPES LESS MAN 4X AND IF NECESSARY. SEEDED WM MASS TO PREVENT EROSION. 4. ME TEMPORARY BASIN SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND STABMM WN SOO UPON APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF ROOTS OR OMER MOODY VEGETATION AS METE AS OVERSIZED STONE AND ROCKS, 8 STOM INLET PROTIMON 6• CONCRETE SUB. BROOM FINISH N REINFORCING BARS 12. O.C. BON WAYS, 3' CLEAR T O 12• BANK RUN GRAVEL r COMPACTED SLOGRADE I'31 REINFORCED CONCRETE PAD _ T_D• (MRM E VIROENCE, OR APPROVED J)EACH N DART PRESMALL BE ICIPITgnON EVENT.NSPECTED Y, AMC AFTER EWAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED.) MAINENMCE SHALL BE PERFORATED AS NEEDED, AND FILTER FABRIC. OR MOWN SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN 'BULGES' MIRE FABRIC DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. WOVEN OR FETAL STAKE 4)BROIIEN STAKES SHALL BE REPLAGD) PROMPTLY. (NA. 10. O.C.) KEY FABRIC INTO Mo11ND (MIN. 6•) CONSTRUCTION SPECflCATIOIS SILT FENCE SHALL BE EITHER PRE -FABRICATED EROSION CONTROL FENCE (MNM EN —FENCE, OR rou OR CONSTRUCTED -IN -MACE, AS SPE D HEWEIN. PRF i) FENCE SHALL BE INSTALPARALLEL UPSTREAM. AND FILTER FABRIC RIC SIBE SHALL FACE FACE UPSTREAM. MESHAND STAKES SHALL FACE DOIMVS DOMNSIREAM. 2)ESHALLEX TEO MINIMUM 6 INCHES DEEP DN EA UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE LINE E%CESS RAP OF INTER NCH. TRENCH a IL BE SHALL BE PULED IN TRENCH. TRENCH SHALL BE THIS MAN AND COMPACTED. CONSTRUCTION IN THIS PARER PUNER S SEDIMENT -LADEN LADEN RUNOFF FROM ROMND UNDER mr FENCE. EONS ✓' n-IN- ♦ n T FEN/`F I)FENOE POST SHALL BE ONWN. 10 FEET MAXWUN ON CENTER: POSTS SNALL BE DRIVEN WNWUM 21' BELOW GRADE. FENCE SHALL BE POSITIONED AS SHOWN. PARALLEL TO THE GROUND CONTOURS 2)TRENCH SI/ALL BE EXCAVATED MINIMUM 6 INCHES DEEP ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE LINE. 3)ww. MIRE FABRIC Of GA., 6 INCH MAX. MESH OPENING) S HAI BE STAPLED OR FASTENED SECURELY WTH IMW TIES TO UPSTREAM .90E OF FENCE POSTS. MOWN CURE FABRIC SHALL EXTEND MINNUM 36 INCHES ABOVE GRADE 4)MTER FABRIC SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF -WIN CURE FABRK: WN WRE TIES. SPACED EVERY 24 INCHES. AT TOP AND NO - SECTION OF FENCE. MINIMUM 8 IN FLAP OF FILTER FABRIC SMALL BE PACED IN TRENCH ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE, AND BACHFILLED, S)IVNCI IMP SECTIONS OF FABRIC AD"N EACH OTHER, THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY 6 INCHES FOALED AND STAPLED. 6)SILT FENCE SNALL BE WSPECTED MEEKLY, AND AFTER EACH SONNCANT PRECIPITATION EVENT. MAINTENANCE WALL BE PERFORMED AS HEEDED, AND SEDWONT REMOVED WEN •BULGES• DEWLOP IN SILT FENCE. r6_'� SILT FENCE fie• _ 1'-0' NOTES: • STAKE ONLY IN EXTREMELY WNDY CONDITIONS. JT1 • IF MOM. PLANT THIN BARKED TREES WN THE SAW SUN @ OR MAPORIENTATIONN MAP M WB1E POLYPROPYLENE WRAP tt\_ "UMW -BURLAP, LOOSEN. CUT. B REMOVE 0)0� 0) NATURAL BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE SYNMEIIC BURLAP mm �LCFD CURE BASKETS CUT AWAY BOTTOM RINGS. PARTIALLY SACKFILL THEN REMOVE RENAMING WRE. PUNT TREE AT SANE DEPTH AND IN SAME ORIENTATION AS TREE WAS GROAN -J'LAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCH (TO BE APPROED BY LANDSCAPE ARCNNECi OVEIP PEANEABIE NEEDNEED F K �I n -ill �ifl �lN_Il-fll A1-�1� 1TF--Ill- -I1- rill � i mr mII �---NG EOF BAL S TOIDiRT IF TO L IS P OF BALL. IF SOIL IS A1ELY RANT PIT WDM CLAY OR GUAVA AVEL _GRPORGANIC JX BALL DIAL - �--- ��-- ORGANIC MATERIAL MAT 9 TREE PLANTING DETAIL WELL TO MODERATELY DRAINED SOIL 2uo2 1Nra61 CGIM.KINIC TNG.mrs L-1R9O25 vECElOnntws: 1/2' EXPANSION/CONTRACTION JOINT METH ASPHALT IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD FILLER EVERY W FEET SCORED OR TOOLED MNT (I- DEPTH OR T/3 THE TOTAL DEPTH OF WAIN() WN A SEPARATION DISTANCE EQUAL TO ME WN OF THE SM.ALK. FULL -BREAK OR COMPLETE JOINT EVERY 20 FEET NOT. DISTANCES ARE TYPICAL AND MAY BE ALTERED FOR SPECIFIC SITE CONDITIONS. 4 TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDE WALK r/2• . r'_o• SPACING VARIES DEPENDING ON _.... CHANNEL SLOPE CDINS'a K:11OI�bFlF.ADOOSbFl!'AB STONE CULL BE PLACED ON A FILTER FABRIC FOUNDATIONTO TIE"" GRADE$ AND IOCATI0N5 SMOWI IN 1HE A MAN. 2. SET SPACING OR GEC( DAYS TO SAYE ILEVA nW _----- -------- ----- -LIKST ASSUME MAT ME ELEVATIONSOF THE CREST OF ME DOWNSTREAM DAM 6 AT j THE SAW ELEVATION OF ME WE OF ME UPSTREAM DAY ICE - -- -- 3 EXTEND THE STOW A IRaNAI OF 1.5 FEET BEYOND ME DITCH BANKS To PREM,IT CUTTING ARCUM 111E DAw. PROFILE -A A PROTECT ME CHANNEL ODNNSiREAM TIE LOWEST CHECK DAY FROM SCOUR 8 AND ER090N WM STOW OR IMER AS APPROPWATE. - ... 3 ENSURE MAT CHANNEL 9 YN APPURTENANCES SUCH AS OI.WRT ENTRANCES BELOW CNFC( BANS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO CANAGI: OR BLOCKAGE FROM DISPUCtD STV W e. TO BE PLACED IN OTCNE$ OVER FILTER FABRIC 2•-IS' GRADED STONE TX IF RIP RAP IS NOT INSTALLED WAIN 2S HORS AFTER DITCH IS LEANED OR AS ORDERED BY ENGINEER. �8 _.... __.. _. 9CnQN_A-A T4' MAX YAXWUN DRAINAGE AREA T ACRES • CCNILR CHECK DAM O,OH POPE SPACING - FEET 3 70 4 30 SECTION B-B 3 M 6 33 30 e 26 71 STONE CHECK DAM TOLL cOI6�uING TH�I�.IR. TEST P,u�FP M..P.., „A ...,, 9U' ® J• LAYER SHREDDED BARK NULCN 6Q, (TO BE APPROVED BY'EMU RE ARCHITECT) OVER PERMEABLE WED FABRIC. DO NOT MACE ROSE TO a MAIN STEM, gtlp J' SAUCER RIAI I r_-_T IIIjl il-Bl:- I_ rF'uT-�T�-�� -BOTOILL EMSBNC SOL TO DEPTH OF BALL PLANT PIT WON 3% NV - BALL DIAL •PLANT SHRUB AT SAME DEPTH AT WBCH SHRUB HAD PREVIOUSLY CROW! N.00SEN, CUM, R REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL -SHREDDED BARK MULCH AND REED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE CON- TINUOUS WEN USED IN BEDS. BALL AND BURLAP SHRUB iNla6t GYFSI.E1N.i 000rLues L-RS90.1$ TEMPORARY EROSION .OHM ♦Pr rAc I) ME SMALLEST PRACTICAL AREA OF LAND SHALL BE EXPOSED AT ANY ONE TIME. 2) CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENT AND EROSION COMMIX FACILLTIES. EROSION AND SEGMENT MEASURES SMALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY FARM MOVING OPERATIONS. 3) SILT FENCE MACEMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED AS NOTED ON PLANS. PERIODICALLY SILT FENCES SMALL BE MAINTAflIED AND CLEANED UNTO ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAW A HEAL MY STAND OF CRASS. 4) WON PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY M4ECUNG AND SEEDING IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTNIN OF ALL FILL AND CUT SLOPES. S) AFTER ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED TIE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE REMOVED. ER090N OO41Rd_ U11Lry CWeINL=POI NOIEc 1) THE AREACREWACTOR SHALL DISTURB AM RM TV ACCOMJkSN EACH ORES NE MINIMUM PRACTICAL DAYS WOW. 2) EXCAVAIED TRENCH MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF TRENCH. 3) IMMEDIATELY FOLLOMNG PIPE INSTALLATION. THE TRENCH SHALL BE IMIMFILUD, COMPACTED, AND IMMEDIATELY STABLLZED (MULCHED AND SEEDED OR SODOM). 4) TEMPORARY SILT FENCES SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY OOMN STREAM (APO PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS) OF ANY WORK AREA INTENDED TO BE DISTURBED FOR MORE THAN ONE MTXI(IM DAY. S) EXCAVATKXN AND PIPE INSTALLATION SHALL BE AVOIDED DURING PERIODS OF SI WFICANT PRECIPITATION. 6) ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES AND WGLTAVW STABILIZATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE MTH ME SPECIFICATIONS HEREON. AND THE WRMONT HANDBOOK FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION SITES ll EROSION CONTROL NOTES ": TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (GCE) 4780*MBad P.O.8=X8 =6796iiIWmim) WEI Vam-9 om 818?18'K40608W NMCOPUA"WVAL MBIM ION URAV�I TI»Y m .e, tiMa m Na ddPMP a eee.WPeum a,W.«I. ruavlcla�aaa.nw,LL Twl.eeuen.t�e.�i.r/w,renu q •Ik b IM Palst 1T w,e- We4.w b m o. �Ie www�r..Iqi �(T� twaw yM...ru Tlb, (ti/w) Mr ..wwa yyrw�e, arX aea9Nw �9iM,nA��awM arwlp M a eaMN'1M MPS Wwy e•MW Wu aM bed eF9MeW. ti N.e,nbnM NMyFv�du Nr� g011� WUh.•w1�P mPY dNY Ei me0. 6y q. Fplrr. WM uW. •+wewmY le wr. ab PePY awlw W mu, (. T BT vbkm ,,,,,,,LIINFFEFFFF, `N OF V ", w ERIA, * H CIV11 4 /''MMFFp)F�II110NN`` Pffiledrae CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt Sheet 710• Construction Details DMBW DIS NUMB- 2003007-70 ElElaalaM , GO Pf nwrA a, ..PP DIB RMP Daft, 10/29/2004 Sale, A$ SHOWN D] 4' WR1E L.P/E REFLECTORIZED STOP BAR--- EDGE Or MAW1E0 WAY WIRE ♦ MINIMUM ---- 30' MANIUUM EDGE aF __ SIIOVIDER •�__________ _ _ _________ -__ I 1 I 1 I 1 g 24' P 6' MINIMUM 12• MAXIMUM 10? i_ • DOUBLE 4' - WHITE PAINTED LETTERING 'STOP' YELLOW CENTERUNE IUPaarwT NDie • THE 'DESIRED STDPRNGME POINT D ME LOCATION BASED GN RSITEOA CONUVONS TRA THAT BEST ALLOWS ME STOPPED WHICLE 1G NEW THE APPROACHING MANIC. 1 STOP BAR LAYOUT REFERENCE AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION E-193 STANDARD DETAIL r T 4' i-r z- B 1/1' S J J/B• 26/B. E WAY B 1/2' 2' 2 3/B' 3 3AC 1 1/2" R-. Mat 11^0" R THE REGULATORY SIGN SHOWN ON MIS MTAIL SHALL HAW BLACK TEXT OR REFLECTORIZED WRTE BACKGROUND. ME COLORS SHALL CdNTdRM WTH ME COLORS ADOPTED BY THE AMERICMN ASSOCIATION OF STATE PGNWAY AND MANSPORTAnON OM SAND APPROWD BY ME DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION!, FEDERAL HIN.Y ADMNISTRAnON Y THB MS THE SICK BAY MAIERlALS USED FOP NE REGULARMY SW SHOWN ON MIS DETAIL MAY BE ANY OF THE FpWN LOG OF ME YNIMUI NNMNE55 NOTED. 11-.B- IB' x 24' JD' x 29• b' . ICI' FLAT SHEET ALUMNUM O0' 0.'.' HIGH DENSITY OERLAID PlTWO1D OI/1 I'2 i ci OL 1 GALVANIZED FLAT SHEET STEEL iA . cE 1 CE THE REFLECTW MATERIAL FOR GROLIND MOUNTED SIGNS SHALL BE nAT TOP WWTF REFLECnW SNUTING APPLIED TO THE ENTIRE BACKGROUND OF ME SIGN. ME TEXT OF THE SIGNS MAY BE LETTERING RLM, SILK SCREENED, OR HAND PANTED. WHEN HMO PAINTED, POOR WORKMANSHIP SNP Be CAUSE FOR REJECnON REGULATORY SIGNS SHALL MEET THE WRMONT STANDARD SPECIFICATONS FOR 'MANIC SIGNS'. LE Idn, ARROWS, SPADING, AND TEXT DIMENSIONS SHALL CONFORM WN ME STANDARD ALPHABETS AND DESIGNS PRESCRIBED IN THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEICES SOURCE : WRMONT A.O.T. STANDARD E-142 4 E AY" HOMER ME PROFESSIONAL ACn N ITS OF MUDELL CONSULING ENGINEER£ NC. (TOE). NOR THE PRESENCE GN TCE OR ITS EMPLOYEES AND SLOLONSULTANTS AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL RELEW TIE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ANY OTHER ENTITY OF THEN ODIGATIGN£ DUTIES AND RESPQVSrSITIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CONSMUCnON MEANS METHODS. SEQUENCE TECINIOUES OR PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR PERFORMNG. SUPERINICHOING OR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WYN CE GGNSMUCNCN IN ACCORDANCE WN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALM OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REQUIRED BY ANY REGULATORY AOENCES. TCE AND In PERSONNEL HAW NO AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OWR ANY CONSTRUCRON CONTRACTOR OR OTHER ENnTY OR THEIR EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION WN THEIR WORK OR ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUnONS. THE CLIENT AGREES MAT ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR "SITE SAFETY, AND WARRANTS MAT MIS INTENT SHALL BE MADE ENDENT IN ME CLIENTS AGREEMENT WN THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. ME CLIENT ASO AGREES NAT ME CLIENT, TCE AND TCE'S CONSULTANTS SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED AND SHALL BE MADE ADDITIONAL WSUWRS UNDER ME GENERA CONTRACTOR'S 00WRAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY. nxfamsHla OF DOtl1YEN75 ALL DOCUMENTS INCUDWG CALCULATOI£ COMPUTER FILES DRAWNG£ AND SPECPIGATONS PRERARED BY ICE PURSUANT TO MIS AGREEMENT ARE INSTRUMENTS OT PROFESSIONAL SERNCE INTENOOD FOR THE ONE-TIME USE IN CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROXCT THEY ARE AND SHALL REMAIN ME PROPERTY OF TCE. ANY REUSE WMOUT WRUTTEN APPROVAL OR ADAPTATION BY ICE IS PROIWTED. dC SAFE EMWZ IT IS ME RESPONSIBILITY OF ME GENERAL NNTRACTOR W OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN A DIG SAFE PERMIT. CONTACT DIG SAFF AT i-BBB-344-n33. A DIG SAFE PERMIT IS REOIUNED PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING ON A COVSIRLIC110N STY:. 'ITT THE LAW.- COLORS LEGEND - WINE S(REF (RW W) ENCAPSULATED LENS '�0000©o I�mvnomem� r.�mvnomom �D�Qmm©®Q =LI& THE REGULATORY SIGN SNOW ON MI DETAIL SHALL HAW W IE TEXT ON REFLECTORIZED RED BACKGROUND. THE COLORS SHALL CONFORM WM ME COOPS ADOPTED BY ME AMERICAN ASSOCIATGN OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTAVON OFTICALS AND APPROWO BY ME DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATON, FEDERAL NIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR. YBff.BIBLS THE SIGN BASE MATERIALS USED FOR THE REGULATORY SIGN SHOWN ON N IS DETAIL MAY BE ANY q- ME FOLLOWNG OF THE MINIMUM THICKNESS NOTED. 14' n 29•X 21' 29• r 30' JO' .M• x 24' I2" x 12• M. r ' 38• x 36• 49• 30C ,e' x fe` 30' x 30' 4e' x SIB• eo' n FLAT SHEET ALUMINUM 0.G60• GOBO• O.IOO" 0.125' HIGH, DENSITY aWRLAID PLYWO]D ". 1/2• SIB" 5/8' GALVANIZED FLAT SHEET STEEL 18 GAGE 16 GAGE 19 GAGE 12 CADE ME REPLECRW MATERIAL FOR GROUND MOUNTED SIGNS SHALL BE FLAT TOP WHIT RETIECRW SHEETING APPUm TO THE ENURE SACKGROUNO OF THE SIGN. THE TEXT OF THE SONS MAY BE LETTERING FEN, SEK SCREENED. OR HAND PANTED. WHEN HAIR PANTED. POOR NDRKMANSHW SHALL BE CAUSE FOR REECROH. REGULATORY SIGNS SHALL MEET 11E WRMGNT STANDARD SPECIFlCAnGNS FOR 'IRAFflC SONS'. LETRRS. DOT£ ARROWS, SPACING AND TEXT 01MENajKNS SHALL ORM WN TINE STANDARD ALPHABETS AND DESIGNS PRESCRIBED IN ME MANUAL ON UNFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEICES. SOURCE : WRMONT A.O.T. STANDARD E-IA3 %2� -STOP" SIGN •I J HANDICAPPED PARKING ONLY - Yx I/$- STEEL ML P N P B' r3• STUDS TYPICAL.I:t s/ 'i. I`•,' -.CONCRETE SETTNG �J.. If . 127*kk P PARKING SIGN MAs ixc. COLORS SYMBOL - RED (REFLEcnW) LEDGEND AND BACKGROUND -WHITE (RfnECVW) ENCAPSULATED LENS ILOBI THE REGULATORY SON d MII ON TINS "TAR SNAI- HAIL WRTE TEXT ON REFLECTORIZED WRIC BACKGROUND. THE COLORS SHALL CONFORM WN THE COLORS ADOPTED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCUPON OF STATE MGHIYAY AND TRANS TADON OTICIAL5 AND APPROWO BY THE DEPT OF TRANSPORTATON. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. Md/E06L5: ME SIGN BASE MATERIALS USED FOR THE REGULATORY SIGN SHOWN ON THIS DETAIL MAY BE ANY OF ME FOLLOWNG OF ME MINIMUM THICKNESS NOTED. 24 O 24" x 24" 24" x 30" 38' G 30" M' x 24" ,2" X 12' 30' x 18• 36" x 36' 4a• A IB" 30• x 30" 48' x AB, 60' G D FLAT SHEET ALUMINUM O.OBOa, " 0,100• 0.125" HIGH DENSITY OWRLAID PYMINJD M. 1/1' S/8• 5/B' GALVANIZED Mr SHEET STEEL 18 GAGE If GAGE 14 GAGE 12 CAGE THE REFLECTW MATERIAL FOR GROUND MOU NRD SIGNS SHALL BE FLAT TOP WHITE REFLECTW SEE,NG APPLIED TO THE ENTIRE BAGKCRGVNA CE TIE SIGNTHE TEXT OF THE SONS YAY BE UTTERING FILM SIN SCREENED. OR HAND PANTED. WHEN HAND PAINTED. POOP MORKMANSIRP SHALL BE CAUSE FOR RE•ECNOV. i REGULATORY SARIS SHALL MEET NNE VERMGNT STANDARD SPECfICATNIlS FOR 'TRAFFIC 9G15•. LETTER£ DIGITS• ARRGWS, SPACNO AND TEXT OMENSIONS SHALL CONFOWI WN THE STANDARD ALPHABETS AND DESIGNS PRESCRIBED N ME MANUAL ON UMFORY TRAMC CONTROL DEICES SOURCE : WRMOHT A.C.T. STANDARD E-I13 �mm0R3 ®©®©®Q r31 "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN T_o RUUD AC SERNCE 25OW METAL HAUUE TES TYPE III DISMNBURpN DARX BRONZE FINISH. f G. R jj SEE LU HARE FOOTING OEM& 6 TYPICAL LUM►NAIRE LrN� of6�T LR1STlNG GK/\DE kltt:361f WALK) " 1ROfo5ED MAD 1 �'. .61) L"D NU S 1:1 { �s -GROUNDING ,ERWNAL HAND HOE AND COWR LIGHT POLE GROUNDING BUSHING (1 PCS) BAY PLANE NOTE : DIMENSIONS DEPENDENT ON ACTUAL PXTURE USED SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS FOR BOLT PATTERN LAYOUT GRACE $ZEL ANCHOR Ban �• • i/4• PVC SOH 40 -_ STEEL (1 PCSAMZED :f is, SGNOMBE A R a — ElE'CiRILAL BQVONG CONDUCTORS ART GROUND ELECTRODE PER � ART 130 N.E.C. II .III ,,III I11 ,III %71 LUMINA/RE FOOTING N.T.S. C, I.y . of I� TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (rCE) 4MN*P FAW P.Q&K= (90R)179W10h0DQ WYRRL WroOp ON" mm $70400000 m Aw Au vw wAw Aw www.vww.wwwwrwn TIRr NEAR Ar YMrW IDW TR IREOs q1 CCr� AIN OVAL StrrrrON RUSFAM&Y ARII.OVAL rrMYrON ACE RD r SwAssm REM. ARBOVAL SU M 00M C016R1C110N ORA\VR= x o.P•Ww wsP« N.....w.um >. W1.aw .. M .w W �:I�i.:w a e: w°vwn"•P.eeww'°•".IwI e'Iw"''aM'e �•Ww :� m'b MI � u.. Mvnlen a r� cm.AlM uRWw lTcn MN.. 9Am�mIM baP.q, na M wWMN 'TnM IwrWw Oa .w.Iw •vv ma ioW gpPwl. •w•Aw nw_bP.M," P Per e: mPa.� a.bE."Rvw. A�•H°' M w.—m.Wr m b.X. IN. 71D. Duaplal DIIEW � ReRWrW AO►w floe CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive & Route 116 (Hinesburg Road) So. Burlington, Vt S1roS n" Construction Details DrwN1g Nu bo: 2003007-71 Pidwid 11L OU p,01w nwrAw, .Pp DRW RUIN DBSbI 10/29/2004 SC"I AS SHOWN App ved g SPECIAL NOTES i 1RLNIML CIx51A11.0 DImlElxs LAST rNze Of11LM01 SECTION A -A' KENNEDY pR,V. Graphic Scale Feet 20 0 20 40 60 BO LEGEND O REBAR ( TO BE SET ) 0 IRON PIPE ( FOUND ) 0 CONCRETE MONUMENT (UND FO) Q CALCULATED PT O CONCRETE MONUMENT ( TO BE SET) 4 UMNY PO£ P------- OVERHEAD UMITY LMES THIS PLAT IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: 1) DEEDS RESEARCHED IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BURUNGTON LAND RECORDS 2) A CLOSED FIELD TRAVERSE CONDUCTED WITH A TOTAL STATION ON 11/B/04, BEARINGS ARE BASED ON MAGNETIC NORTH TAKEN ALONG A LEG OF THE TRAVERSE. J) RE'BARS SET ARE NO S REINFORCING BARS WITH ALUMINUM CAPS STAMPED 'TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGOIE'ERS LS 4BB'. CONCRETE MONUMENTS FOUND ARE FOUR ITICHES SQUARE. 4 7HIS PARCEL WAS CONVEYED TO C.D. CAIRNS BLE TRUSTS PARTNERSHIP IN VOLUME JBS PAGE 461 5) DISTANCES ARE ACCURATE TO THE NEAREST 0.05' AND ARE'SHOMN TD 7NE HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. BEARINGS ARE ACCURATE TO THE NEAREST 10 SECONDS AND ARE SHOWN TO THE SECOND FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. 8) AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO IDENTIFY OR DELINEATE EASEMENT$ RIGHTS OF WAY. LEASE LANDS ENCROACHMENTS, ETC OBSERVED IN THE FIELD OR READILY FOUND IN THE LAND RECORDS ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 7) UNDERGROUND U71UTY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES AND PLANS OF REOORD. ACTUAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND LINES MAY VARY. WNIµWIIW,n/(y, y SC0. , TA�NO. 88 � C,pENS� g yam mrennanWIWIVV� RwWpn DeaolPWon D4a ar Boundary Plat C.D. CAIRNS IRREVOCABLE TRUSTS PARTNERSHIP 110 KennedDrive y South Burlington, Vt. D— ft Tambe 2003001-40 Lat! ^o� ev. PP III— WT pay 11/10/04 Se4la r"M °ev1 221 Dbk T <!r TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 Slat P4A Road P. 0. Sax NO WMd*M V—ont ON" (OW 8794M f 10 left +0.0+0.0+0.0+0. + .3 ' 10. +7: { 4�0+9 10.119.9 6 �`� OAO.00AOAO. + + + } 0.0 0.0+0.0+o.0+0.0+0.0+0. .6 11. 3 3 6. ,d, .1 1 .7 1 1 0.7' �'I.b�{ .7 + + + + + + + + OS 0.00.00.0+o.00.00.0+o. + 11. 1 2.5 11•:S 2 11.1 11.3 1.7 + + + +0.0+0.0+0.0+0.00.+ 0.00.00.000.01 + + + + + 4 .o0.dO.00.o0.00.00.00.dO.00.01 8. 9.e 1 8.�'' 9 10.99_ 410.1�10`1= 10.8'10.7 0.3 _ .60.dO.60.0o.0o.00.00.00.00.01 .3 + .0+.0+0.0+0.00.0+0.0+0.0+0.00.0+0.0+0.0+1 + . , 0. 0+ .0 0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.00.0+0.01 0.00. 0. 0.00.00.00.00.0o.00.00. 0 .0 �. �- + + + + + + + + + _.... 0 0.¢0.0 .d0 0.00.00.00.0 .0 .00. +0.66.0 0. .0+0. + . OOA0.0 0 01 �. 0.00. o.o .do.o oti o . +o.00 .d`o. 0.00 0.0.00.�o o d0.�o. 11 0.00.0 . 00.00. s . 0.d0. oA.1I Snap Shot # 1 + + + 0.o+0.60.00.0 .+ o + 4+1.1 `. do. �0.> STATISTICS Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Overall Site 1.3 fc 13.3 fc 0.0 fc N / A Canopy jk 9.8 fc 13.3 fc 6.0 fc 2.2:1 'irking Area 1.7 fc 10.2 fc 0.0 fc N / A LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Symbol Catalog Number Description Lamp PBX-TL94-85 Prescolite Litebox 6" Le Lensed 2 - 13 W fluorescent +� o 12" AREA CUTOFF / Scale 1" = 20' 0.00.0+0.00.00.0+0.0 p,1 .10.1` .�`0. .40.50.81 4 O.o+OA+oA0.0+0.00A0 i + 4 1: Q. go. 0. .40.6�`0.91 2. MAC2612SBL �//gACK LT. SHIELD 125 WATT PSMH +0.00.00.00.0+0.00.0 •. ` .0 x 1. 0. 0. 0.60.61.0` .6�`2.6. 4. + •1 +OAOAo.0+0.00.00.0 0.Q�0 0. 0.60.91. 2.62.d`3.'�`3.�/ 12" CUTOFF / +0.0+0.00.�0.0+0.0+0.00. + 0.0 5�0.1. 2.42. 3 w MAC2612SBL /gACK LT. SHIELD 125 WATT PSMH + + + + + + + + + J t oo.00.00.00.00. 0.0 e� 0.6'n, � 1. 1.40. - 0. o .00.00.00.0 �0 .0 0.�`1:1.d1.521.0. 6`0. 1 16" RECESSED +0.00. 00. 00.0 . + .0 .3 '0. ` .6�0.81.d`0. .0 .20.1+ + AV-�540 DOWNLIGHT (MEDIUM 150 WATT MH + DISTRIBUTION o.00.00.00. oo. o.o .o '\ �a: .d`o. �`o.a . 0. 0. o. o .10 .7Xo. ) o.60.o+0.00.0o.00. a- A. 1+ +0.60A0.0+0.6-0A0A0A0 s - 6(1: oo. 000A.kkkkA.2 0. +0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0+0. . 0000000.1 . A.I o'k. +0.60.00.00.do.00.00.do.0 fo.00fo.6.6 0.fo.ofo.: �2:.. 431 0.\ +0.60.60.0+0.0+0.0+0.60.60 0. s0 0.-0. o.fo.6 . . o.fo.�`0.�0.6.&6.fo. . 0.a1. .63.9414. +0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.�0.0+0.0+0 1:4 1. 1.1 1' . `o. 0 0.�`0.'�`0.'�`0.�`0.1"0.1�`0.'�0.'�`0.'�`0A. 5�01(` 1315. x 0.00.00.uu.00.00.uu.00 v3.. 1. 1. ,1.d Yu 60.30. 0.zu.z`0.10.i0.10.i u.i u.1 0.1x0.I U.I U.l U.I U.I U 0. 0 61 +0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+ 3. 13. 1.� 110. 0. 0.�! .1610. ` 0.io.So.9o.So.: `o.: `o.�o.io.io.�o.io.1�`o-fo.1 o.1 o.fo.1 o0 . e 1+4.9+ +7. � +0.0+o.0+o.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+ . 3.13. 4141.0 10A.1"0.1"0AAA .85.3 J. +O.60.0+o.0+0.0+0.0+0.6o.o+0.0+0 +0.0+0.0+0.0+0.150.60.0+0.60.0+0. + -11.Si. , �.4 1 11. ... n 0. o. do.hio.& fo.6.& + .6+1. 2.SZY4. O . 0. +o.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+o. + C�ly ' (� 0. 0. :t �41. 1. 0`3.S%4 _ 0� 4: 3. 3.... . 0.40.�` fo.1 O.�0. 0. 1:1+1.3+1.2+ . 0: 0. c� � c +0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+o.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0 f .S 04010. f o. 0. 0.3 0. .10.1 O.6o.00.6o.00.00.0+0.00.00.0+0.0o.00.60. U $O. 0.0`0. /. 6. 1 8. 1010. 0.1 0. 2+0.20.1 0.1 +0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+o.0+0.0+0. + . + . 0.0 o. 0 0. 0 .9 , 4. 7 1 6�S:a6 0O.d0. 0. 10. 1, .1+0.1+0.1+0. 0.10.0 0.00.60.00.0+0.00.00.0+0. O.OO.00.f�O. 0. .00 0 0.40 d5 0 1 2 h2 0. �I 00. 22`0.10. 8 d 1 1 0.10.0 .00.0 +o.0+0.0+0.0+o.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+ + .00.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0. , 0. 1 �8. 1 1. 1 1. 0.� 0. 0 0.1 0 + 0+0.d 0.0 +0.0+o.0+0.0+o.0+0.0+ + . 0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0+0.00.0+0.0 1` 0. 1, 2. E# .1 / 10. , . 0: I 0 . /x'/' `4.6X 0 0. 0. + 0 +• +0. A 0.0 +o.co.o+ + . 0.0+0.o+o.6o.o+o.o+o.6o.o+o.o+o.6o.o+o.o+o.6o.o+o. : a.6`04040. 1.� t ..__ _ __'. 3< dodo. ` .-I . i'o ob,c� .+ .d0.0 + + 0.0+o.00.6o.00.o+o.coo.o+o.o+o.do.o+o.0+o.6o.0+o.o+o.do.o+o. `T> Via: ; a 4: `6 ' 6.; o o.' .ao'o 0 0.0 Plan View + + + + o. 0+0.00.00.0+0.00.00.0+0.00.00.0+0.0 6�4.1"3.12. 1.6. 0. 5 0. 01 +. _ -0 Scale 1" - 30' + + + + 0.00.00.0 O+0.00.00.00.00.00. . 76.54.33. 2.01 620. 0. d1.41 �f1:�1 ` . - 31:.. 3.�� . 3: 60. • + O0.1 .0 . + + +0. +0.0+0.0+0.0+ + .60.60.60.60. + 0+0 + 1+ 5. 6. 0. 0_ 6�0. 1_ 1 .23. 3:b� 9 + :0+1. +0�6+0. .1 0.1+O.d0.0+0.0*0 0 u* + + + + .0+0.0+ 3.d4.13.L�+0.20a110.1+0.1+0.00 + 0. 2 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 2.44.1 4.9 .10.1 0.0 .00.0 S TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) C ii Q c� Z G � OLLI >W Uo> J z Ooo w Zz Zz-:3 wir 0 o pp O A, LJ Designer AAL Date Nov 5 2004 Scale 1"=20' Drawing No. 2003007 1 of 1 Permit Number SD- 64 - g4 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership Mailing Address: c/o Champlain Oil Co. P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 649-3229 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book: 396 Page: 480-482 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: Champlain Oil Company Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 649-3229 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: Paul Wamsganz Mailing Address: Champlain Oil Company P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 649-3229 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 110 Kennedy Drive 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0970-0110-C 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 1,775 square foot building with convenience store and two (2) service bays, four (4) fuel pumps (8 fueling positions), and a 2,200 square foot canopy. b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Raze existing building and construct a new 2,600 sq. ft. convenience store and sandwich shop with seating. Four (4) fuel pumps (8 fueling positions) and 2,200 square foot canopy will remain. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain 2,600 sq. ft d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Not to exceed 30 ft. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 4 to 5 employees proposed g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Project is in a traffic overlay district. h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. no boundary changes proposed 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? No b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? N/A c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following items with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. Permit Number SD- 64 - g4 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership Mailing Address: c/o Champlain Oil Co. P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 649-3229 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book: 396 Page: 480-482 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: Champlain Oil Company Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 649-3229 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: Paul Wamsganz Mailing Address: Champlain Oil Company P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 649-3229 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 110 Kennedy Drive 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0970-0110-C 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 1,775 square foot building with convenience store and two (2) service bays, four (4) fuel pumps (8 fueling positions), and a 2,200 square foot canopy. b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Raze existing building and construct a new 2,600 sq. ft. convenience store and sandwich shop with seating. Four (4) fuel pumps (8 fueling positions) and 2,200 square foot canopy will remain. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain 2,600 sq. ft d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Not to exceed 30 ft. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A f} Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 4 to 5 employees proposed g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Project is in a traffic overlay district. h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. no boundary changes proposed 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? No b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? N/A c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following items with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 12) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): IN:875 OUT: 875 TOTAL: 1750 b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): IN: 61 OUT: 60 TOTAL: 121 c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out ) IN: 73 OUT: 73 TOTAL: 146 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 4:30 — 5:30 PM 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Friday 15) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: November 2005 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11 " x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application (see Exhibit A). 2. a response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: 46,743 sq. ft b) Building Coverage: Existing: 1,879 square feet, 4.0 % Proposed: 2,848 square feet, 6.1 % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing: 20,825 square feet, 44.6 % Proposed: 26,157 square feet, 56.0 % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Kennedy Drive: Existing: 6,466 square feet, 45.0 % Proposed: 7,685 square feet, 53.5 % Hinesburg Road: Existing: 5,376 square feet, 44.8 % Proposed: 5,467 square feet, 45.5 % 10) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking. • front yard coverage • sideyard setback • parking lot within green belt 11) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $300,000 b) Landscaping: $8,300 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): included in building cost Whereby certify that all the information requested as part of Thn s application has been suhmhted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ' . 7V SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incompiete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 4 EXHIBIT A PRELIMINARY PLAT The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred). o Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared. o Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.) o Location of easements, public lands, r.o.w.s, sidewalks, and public or private street (w/names) o Five foot contours (existing and finished) o Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. o Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks, and other public opens spaces. o Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. o Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative water supply. o Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. o Details of storm water facilities in the form of a drainage plan. o Details of all proposed bridges or culverts. o Location of temporary markers. o All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions. o A list of waivers desired (if any). o Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates). o A report addressing planned residential/unit development criteria of the Zoning Regulations. o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size). o Location of abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Number and location of parking spaces ( see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (see Section 26.253(a) of the Zoning Regulations) o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE o Preliminary Plat Minor Subdivision $ 260.00* o Preliminary Plat Major Subdivision or PUD $ 510.00* *Includes $10.00 recording fee In addition, to be paid at time of preliminary plat submittal: Fee per lot, residential: $100 Fee per lot, commercial: $150 Permit Number SD- 6� - � 5' APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership Mailing Address: c/o Champlain Oil Co. P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 649-3229 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book: 396 Page: 480-482 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: Champlain Oil Company Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 649-3229 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Owner 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Name: Paul Wamsganz Mailing Address: Champlain Oil Company P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Phone Number: (802) 649-3229 Fax Number: (802) 864-0535 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 110 Kennedy Drive 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 1,775 square foot building with convenience store and two (2) service bays, four (4) fuel pumps (8 fueling positions), and a 2,200 square foot canopy. b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Raze existing building and construct a new 2,600 sq. ft. convenience store and sandwich shop with seating. Four (4) fuel pumps (8 fueling positions) and 2,200 square foot canopy will remain. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain: 2,600 sq. ft. d) Proposed height of building (if applicable): Not to exceed 30 ft e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Project is in a traffic overlay district 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 4.0 % Proposed 6.1% b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 44.6% Proposed 56.0% c) Front yard (along each street): Kennedy Drive: Existing 45.0% Proposed 53.5% Hinesburg Road: Existing 44.8% Proposed 45.5% 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.): 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.): There will be no modification to the existing municipal facilities 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet): Name: Manor Woods Association, Inc. Mailing Address: c/o Wanda Campbell, Property Manager P.O. Box 9474 South Burlington, VT 05407 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 2005 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date W, �'-* M, SKETCH PLAN The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. If submitting a plat amendment, please submit only pertinent information. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Name and address of owner of record and applicant. o Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. o Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. o Location map showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. o Boundaries and area of all contiguous land belonging to the owner of record. o Boundaries and area of the proposed subdivision. o Existing and proposed layout of property lines. o Type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land (easements, covenants, etc.). o Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets or private ways. o Existing zoning boundaries. o Existing watercourses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. o Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. o Number and location of parking spaces (see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations). o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard. o A list of waivers desired (if any). o All applicable information required for a site plan application shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development (please see site plan application). APPLICATION FEE ❑ Sketch Plan Application $125.00 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONEEG 575 DOR,SET STREET SOUTH EURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 3464106 FAX (802) 546-4101 December 27, 2004 Paul Wamsganz Champlain Oil Company P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application #SD-04-86 Dear Mr. Wamsganz: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project preliminarily approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board, effective December 27, 2004. Please note the conditions, including that the applicant shall submit a final plat application within 12 months of this decision, or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy cDonou h 9 Administrative Assistant Encl. 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 6, 2004 John Jackson Manorwoods Homeowners Association P.O. Box 93 Burlington, VT 05402 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. �EVENDAYS ► classified@sevendaysvt.com EEKLY INCOME poten- ng our sales letters re. No experience neces- /part-time. Genuine ity. Free supplies and 630-786-6633, 24 4AN CAN) K - $500 K+ 1ST YEAR pportunity. Home -based, No personal setting. rnd support provided. stem. Call 877-347- hours. (AAN CAN) 'RAVEL job. Now hir- positions. Guys/gals to travel entire USA. Paid transportation, lodging . Call today, start today. i05O. (AAN CAN) MOTIVATED? Learn to I K +, no commute. )pportunity, training not MLM. Call now! )946. (AAN CAN) 500 WEEKLY! i surveys online! $25- irvey! Guaranteed pay- ocess emaiLs online. mail. Mystery shoppers hour shopping! .ashPrograms.com. I HED BURLINGTON is seeking a new :ontinue its success. lion and lots of poten- s easily learned siness. Many other ;inesses. CBI Business i3-3459. TO SHOP! Mystery ceded to pose as cus- ining provided. FT/PT. -800-690-1273. ENT JOBS: Earn $12 - 4vail. w/full med- benefits and paid clerical, administra- iforcement, homeland Ldlife, more! 1-800- ext. 2012. (AAN CAN) ing money for some- mtrol your future as )f your own success- e. The Entrepreneur's ie answer. CaLL Pat 6-450-0077. luncements We care about you. regnant and consider - your baby for adop- uld love to talk to call800-844-3630. ['HE HOLIDAYS: Be r opinion w/a market ipany. 800-370-0246. FOR structured set- nuities and insurance I-794-7310. J.G. leans cash now for !ttlements. (AAN CAN) QAS INDOOR FLEA (it 21 off I-89, Thanksgiving week - t t r COMPUTER PROBLEMS? You are not alone! VPC Solutions offers VIRUS/SPYWARE removal, trou- bleshooting and repairs. Visit www.vermontpcsoLutions.com or call Michael, 434-6539. Student discounts. FULL CHARGE BOOKKEEPER: A/P, A/R, payroll, Quickbooks, etc. 16 years' experience. Call Lisa, 802-759-2078 or email rowelt@madriver.com. INTERIOR SERVICES that wilt restore your vision! Interior con- sultation and room rearrange- ment just in time for the holi- days! Apropo Designs, 372-8632 ► computer svcs. A+ CERTIFIED COMPUTER REPAIR by excellent techni- cians. Low rates, fast turn- around. Refurbished computers available. ReCycle North Tech Services, 266 Pine St., Burlington, 658-4143 ext. 23. COMPUTER REPAIRS AND UPGRADES: PCs, Macs, network- ing, web design, tutoring, digi- tal graphics and audio editing. Competitive rates. Many refer- ences. House calls and in -shop. Free quote, 864-7470 or in- housecomp@verizon.net. ► financial A CASH NOW OFFER: Turn future money from lawsuit set- tlements, lottery awards and annuity payments into cash now. Free quotes, 800-815-3503. www.ppicash.com. (AAN CAN) ► cleaning svcs. BRING THE SPARKLE BACK IN TO YOUR EVERYDAY LIFE. Call "Big Boss" Brager and "the gold crown kid." Eco-friendly. Special- izing in top -to -bottom, whole house cleanings. 862-9431. THE CLEAN TEAM: Residential and commercial cleaning service. Also offering move -in, move -out and construction clean-up. Locally owned/operated. Guaranteed. Call The Clean Team today. 310-6770. TOOLS: Craftsmen table saw (needs new fence), detail sander by DremeL, old drills by Shoperaft & Bosch, square fin- ishing sanders by Dewalt & Makita, cement Laying tools, assorted hand tools (some antiques). Please call 233-5621. ► furniture 4 CHAIRS: Dining, wooden w/wicker seats. Bent wood arms, incl. nice custom covers. Great condition. $30O/OBO. Please call 233-5621. IT'S A VERY FUNKY COUCH, the kind you don't bring home to mother! 70s-style gold crushed velvet 3-piece sectional w/black accents and faux -leather table. $250/OBO. 985-5433. SOFA AND 2 MATCHING chairs. 1-month-old formal Chippendale furniture. Maroon, off-white, floral and stripes. Mahogany Legs. $90O/OBO. 863-6147 or 654-2611. ® computers COMPUTER SERVICE & REPAIR: Professional, efficient and prompt computer service. Repairs, upgrades, virus removal and per- formance enhancement. Rose Computer Technology Services. 862-1177. NEED NEW COMPUTER? Bad credit, no problem! Buy a new computer now and pay later. New computers and laptops from $20/mo. Call now, 1-800-311- 1542. (AAN CAN). ► want to buy 12" DISK/BELT SANDER, 6"- 8" JOINTER. 233-5621. ► music for sale BASS: 1860s German period. Used professionally for perform- ance and recording. Excellent condition. With good bag and pick-up. $3200. 802-229-1501. BASS: Czech Juzek plywood, circa 1930. Excellent setup and condition. Great sound. $2800. 802-229-1501. CELLOS, STRING BASSES, VIO- LINS, VIOLAS: New and old instruments, sales, restoration and repair. Experienced luthiers. Paul Perley Cellos, in business since 1988. 802-229-1501, pperLeycetLos@aoL.com. CELLO: Chester Barry, 1922 American. Very clean, excellent player. $4000. 802-229-1501. ► music services CD MANUFACTURING: Give us a call and see why over 200 of New England's top musicians fmmt - %Am-h rho;, rn -... P_ instructor. Reasonable rates! Ethan Snyder, 793-9306. GUITAR: All styles/levels. Emphasis on developing strong technique, thorough musicianship, personal style. Paul Asbell (Unknown Blues Band, Kilimanjaro, Sneakers Jazz Band, etc.), 862- 7696, www.paulasbett.com. GUITAR: Berklee graduate with classical background offers les- sons in guitar, theory and ear training. Individualized, step-by- step approach. I enjoy teaching all ages/styles/levels. Call Rick Belford at 864-7195. GUITAR INSTRUCTION: Relaxed yet disciplined arena. 20+ years experience. No -pretense environ- ment fosters technique and cre- ativity. Beginners welcome. ► egals NOTICE CITY OF BURLINGTON BOARD OF ABATEMENT OF TAXES The Board of Abatement of Taxes of the City of Burlington wit[ meet in Contois Auditorium at City Hall on Monday, December 6, 2004 at 7:00 P.M. to hear and act upon the requests for abate- ment of taxes and/or penalties from: Alyson Hoar 0 Oakledge Drive 056-2-004-001 Alyson Hoar 0 Oakledge Drive 056-2-004-002 The May Co./Filene's Personal Property 134107 Mark & Robyn Yurcek 265 North Winooski Ave 039-4-006-000 Susan Hoxie 128 Cottage Grove 027-3-058-000 Nancy Marrier 160 Ethan Allen Parkway 029-2-079-000 Robert Quinn 11 Claire Pointe Road 021-2-061-011 Frank Haddleton 61 South Union Street 044-4-221-000 Herman Poklukar 20 Oak Beach Drive 056-4-045-920 Jon Chapple PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVEL- OPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hatt Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, December 21, 2004, at 7:30 P.M. to con- sider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD- 04-81 of Paul & Linda Effel to subdivide a 0.57 acre Lot devel- oped with a single family dwelling into two (2) lots of 0.26 acres (lot #1), and 0.31 acres (lot #2), 33 Barber Terrace. 2. Preliminary plat application #SD-04-86 of Champlain Oil Co. for a planned unit development consisting of. 1) razing a 1775 sq ft convenience store and service station building, and 2) constructing a 2600 sq ft build- ing for convenience store use and short-order restaurant with seating, 110 Kennedy Drive. 3. Final plat application #SD- 04-87 of Thomas E. Chase to amend a previously approved planned unit development con- sisting of a 20,300 sq ft general office building. The amendment consists of site modifications to adjust parking layout and add a gravel path, 46 Bowdoin Street. 4. Application #CU-04-15 of Garret & Lisa Huyer for condi- tional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to con- struct a 9' x 14' deck to encroach nine (9) additional feet into the front yard for a total encroachment of 13 feet into the required front setback, 194 Laurel Hill Road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinktage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board December 1, 2004 DON'T SEE A SUPPORT group here that meets your needs? Call United Way GET -INFO (a confiden- tial help line) 652-4636, Monday - Friday, 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. J CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZO E4G 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMOVT 05403 (802) 546-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 17, 2004 Paul Wamsganz Champlain Oil Company P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: 110 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Wamsganz: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, December 21, 2004 at 7.30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, C- CND Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. cocollyc. CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY, INC. July 20, 2004 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05401 Attn: Juli Beth Hoover, Director of Planning & Zoning Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator RE: Redevelopment of 110 Kennedy Drive Vt� A-Mn 45 San Remo Drive P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, Vt. 05407-2126 Telephone 802-864-5380 FAX 802-864-0535 www.champlainoil.com -ZOVI e I 31 / 600 sT l,�v, offo SF X ►5 1q, a vTE As suggested by staff, Champlain Oil Company, Inc. is providing a Trip Generation and Distributing Analysis for this proposed project. This proposed redevelopment is a compatible neighborhood use and the following are some key points to consider when reviewing the report: • The City Council recognized the need for this land use and recent zoning y�y", changes allow for this use as a "conditional use." ti A' • The projected increase in VTE (PM) in addition to current counts will not exceed the ITE National rates for this land use. • Increased product offerings at this site will diminish the need for customers to travel over to Williston Road or Dorset Street seeking goods & services. • Overall site access and internal circulation will improve with this redevelopment. • One of the stated purposes of the traffic overlay district is to "provide incentives to improve site design and access management." Allowing an additional 6.9% increase in vehicles during the PM hour could be considered a small incentive. Respectfully Submitted, Ton021, rns, President TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION ANAL YSIS CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE AND SUBWAY RESTAURANT EXPANSION KENNEDY DRIVE AND HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT June 29, 2004 Prepared by: Abigail Lisius, EIT Jeremy Matosky, PE Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Williston, VT 05495 Prepared for: Champlain Oil Company Attn: Paul Wamsganz P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05401 Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont Introduction On behalf of Champlain Oil Company, Trudell Consulting Engineers has prepared this Trip Generation and Distribution Analysis for the proposed reconstruction of the Mobil gas station and convenience store located on the corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The purpose of this report is to document existing traffic volumes, estimate the vehicle trips that will be generated as a result of the proposed project, and to analyze trip distribution with respect to the proposed site improvements. The procedures and methodologies used in this study are suggested in publications by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans). w Y\O GUr/ou f fhe. TO 7 7 The project will consist of razing the existing 1,775 square foot gas service station / convenience store and construction of a new convenience store with a total building square footage of 3,250 square feet. The net result is an increase of 1,475 square feet of convenience store and deli -style (e.g. Subway) restaurant. The two existing service bays will be eliminated. There are currently four gasoline pumps (eight fueling positions) which will remain. No increase in the number or location of pumps is proposed. Background According to South Burlington regulations, the proposed project is within a Traffic Overlay District. The stated purpose of the Traffic Overlay District is to "reduce traffic conflicts and congestion by providing a performance -based approach to traffic and access management associated with development and re -development of properties in high traffic areas of the City... and to provide incentives to improve site design and access management during the development and redevelopment process"'. The PM Peak Hour between 4 pm and 6 pm is identified in the Ordinance as the time period for evaluation. Traffic Overlay Zones have been established within the districts based on their location in relation to the identified critical intersections or roadways. The proposed project falls within Traffic Overlay Zone 1, which consists of all lots within a specified distance from a major intersection (identified on the attached Overlay District Map). The intersection of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road is a major intersection within South Burlington. Kennedy Drive had an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) of 18,400 in 2002 and Hinesburg Road (VT 116) had an AADT of approximately 11,000 in 2002. The existing Mobil station is located on the northwest corner of this intersection. Currently, there is one access driveway located on Hinesburg Road, and two access driveways located on Kennedy Drive, as shown on the attached Site Plan. All thre�drives currently are unrestricted for entering, exiting, or turning maneuvers. b�ak a-v- t�� 7 Traffic volumes entering and exiting the project site were counted for a two week period using tub*' le automated traffic recorders at each of the three driveways from March 10 to March 24, 2004. The vtieekdaypeak hour volumes were averaged and, according to the count, 75 vehicles entered and 71.gxited the site during the PM Peak hour (occurring between 4:30 and 5:30 PM), for a total o 146yehicle trips. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, has a Land Use Code (LUC) "Gasoline Station with Convenience Store" which most closely reflects the current land use. Based on the existing building square footage the ITE manual estimates 172 PM peak hour trips or approximately 15% more than the site -specific count. 'Amendments to the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, South Burlington City Council, April 6, 2004 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont Trip Generation The proposed building will consist of 2,250 square feet of gas station/convenience store and 1,000 square feet of deli -type (e.g. Subway) restaurant. The current ITE Trip Generation Manual does not contain land use statistics for a gas station/convenience store with a deli -style restaurant. The zoning regulations state that the Development Review Board may approve or may require traffic generation estimates from sources other than the ITE Trip Generation Manual, including local traffic counts, if the ITE Trip Generation manual does not contain any data for a specified use, or sufficient data for a specified use. ITE also recommends that if a new land use not covered by the Trip Generation Manual exists, the analyst should collect local data and establish a local rate. There is an ITE Land Use Code 933 "Fast Food Restaurant without Drive -Through" that could presumably be used in combination with the Land Use LUC 945 "Gasoline Station with Convenience Store" to make a similar land use, but the data shows that only 4 studies have been completed for the fast food restaurant based on building square footage and only 1 study based on the number of seats. In addition, the square footage of the fast food restaurants ranged from 3000 to 5000 sq. ft, versus the proposed 1000 sq. ft. deli style restaurant. This method would not account for overlap between deli patrons and convenience store/gas station patrons, and result in an exaggeration of project generated traffic. To more accurately reflect the proposed project, a local trip generation rate was used to estimate project generated traffic. A trip generation study was performed between May 22 and May 30, 2004 at four similar sites within Chittenden County and one site in Windsor County. The following table shows the comparison between the five sites in the study. All of the sites listed in the study consist of a convenience store, fueling station, and a deli and are located on major roadways. Table 1: Trip Generation Study Sites Fueling Vehicle Trips" AADT` on Major Location Positions Total Sq. Ft Deli Sq. Ft Peak In Peak Out Total Road (Year) Shell & Subway, VT Route 2A, Williston 4 2270 860 48 46 94 19,600 (2002) Colonial Mart, Susie Wilson Road, Essex 4 2400 400 79 73 152 19,300 (2001) Jiffy Mart, US Route 4, Quechee 4 2100 300 76 77 153 9,400 (2003) Rick's, Williston Road, South Burlington 8 1710 450 53 53 1Dl \ 21,000 (2002) Beverage Mart, Route 15, Essex 8 2000 400 92 98 14,700 (2002) 'AADT = Annual Average Daily Traffic "Vehicle Trips are for PM Peak Hour TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 2 Ic_,(,, 4 1 Ci O Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont Table 1 shows that combination deli/convenience stores ranging from 1710 sq. ft. to 2400 sq, ft. see PM Peak Hour traffic ranging from 94 to 190 trips during the PM Peak Hour. The following is a graph of the total building square footage versus the number of vehicle trips generated during the PM Peak Hour. Also shown on the graph is a line and equation that represents the average trip generation rate for the five sites in the study. 300 3 250 O 2 Y A d 200 E a a 150 Q. �L F- d 100 V d 50 0 Vehicle Trip Generation Vehicle Trips vs. Total Sq. Ft. 1500 2000 2500 Total Building Square Footage Figure 1: Average Trip Generation Rate 3000 3500 y= 0.0143x+ 1 Using the average local rate, a total 0 156 v hicle trips was calculated for the proposed 3,250 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store/ deli. As shown in Table 2 below, there will be an additional 10 vehicle trips at the site, which will be distributed, entering and exiting, between three different access points during the PM Peak Hour. Table 2: Proiect Generated Traffic Existing Trips Proposed Trips Additional Trips PM Peak 146 156 +10 Two of the deli sites were studied to determine the distribution of deli -specific traffic. One of the sites is a very similar gas station/convenience store/ Subway restaurant located on VT 2A in Williston, VT, and the other is the Jiffy Mart on Route 4 in Quechee. The following table shows the noon hour (I IAM to 2PM) and afternoon/evening (3PM to 6PM) lunch counts taken at each location. These numbers do not correspond directly to vehicle trips, but are a count of the number of meals purchased during each time period. Table 3 shows that the majority of Subway or deli visits occur during the noon hour. Tahle 3r Suhwav/1)eli Meal Counk Lunch Dinner Shell/Subway Williston 69 8 Jiffy Mart in Quechee 83 7 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 3 Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont Trip Distribution A turning movement count was performed on March 10 and 11, 2004 to determine traffic distribution patterns at the three Mobil entrances. Entrance A is the westernmost driveway on Kennedy Drive, Entrance B is the eastern Kennedy Drive entrance, and Entrance C is the Hinesburg Road entrance. Figure 2 below shows the existing trip distribution for the driveways. Four percent of the total traffic uses driveway B as an ex most vehicles choose driveway A or C, likely because of driveway B's proximity to the Kenney t;Drive/ Hinesburg Road intersection. Future Kennedy Drive improvements proposed by the City of Burlington will eliminate the "left out" and "left in" at driveway B. Eliminating the "right out" at this driveway will add a minimal amount of traffic to the other two driveways. Figure 3 shows the trip distribution estimate after the driveway improvements. See "Site Improvements" section for a detailed description of the proposed reconfiguration. Hinesburg Site 13 R19 oad IN��°f �q 4 1 23 21 LLI 2�_J + 9 19 Kennedy Drive Figure 2: Existing Traffic Distribution — PM Peak Hour Figure 3: Existing Trips with Driveway Improvements It is estimated that an additional 10 vehicle trips will be distributed across the three access points as a result of the proposed project. Vehicle trip distribution is based on existing vehicle patterns observed on the site. Figure 4 below shows the project generated vehicle trip distribution for the PM peak hour. Figure 5 illustrates total site traffic and vehicle distribution during the PM peak hour after the project is complete. Figure 4: Project Generated Trip Distribution Figure 5: Total Site Traffic — PM Peak Hour TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 4 Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont Site Improvements South Burlington Regulations state that "The DRB may allow adjustments to the project's traffic generation or may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the standards set forth for a lot in a traffic overlay zone if the DRB determines that other site improvements with respect to improved access management, internal circulation, connections between adjacent properties, and improved pedestrian access, will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the immediate vicinity of the project." Several site improvements will be constructed along with the proposed project in an effort to improve access management, internal circulation, connections between adjacent properties, and also improve pedestrian access. The following is an excerpt from the City of South Burlington Regulations, Section 10.02(H),2, that discusses the standards for adjustments to a project's traffic generation calculation or to a site's traffic budget, and an explanation of how the proposed driveway improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow. In making its determination of whether other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow, the DRB may consider thefollowing: a) change or reduction in the number and location of curb cuts The location of one of the curb cuts — "Driveway A" will change. The driveway will be relocated seven (7) feet to the west of its current position, which is farther away from the Kennedy Drive/ Hinesburg Road intersection. Increased separation between the access and the intersection is beneficial in terms of safety, access management, and traffic flow. b) creation of secondary access points within lots sufficient for two-way, year-round vehicular and pedestrian movements that provide for suitable internal circulation between properties. A secondary access point is proposed that will allow for two-way, year-round pedestrian movements that will provide for suitable internal circulation between the Mobil station property and the residential development that neighbors to the west. A 6-foot wide paved pathway will be constructed from the western corner of the proposed building to the western property line to allow pedestrian access to the adjacent development. c) The elimination of left turns or through movements across an arterial through the creation of raised medians There will be a raised median installed on the western leg of the Kennedy Drive/ Hinesburg Road intersection as a result of the proposed Kennedy Drive Reconstruction by the City of South Burlington. This raised median will eliminate all left turns into and out of "Driveway B", which is the closest driveway to the intersection. d) Reductions in the width of curb cuts or access points or their definition in a manner that substantially improves the definition of turning and traffic movements into and out of the property, and to a width no greater than the specified maximum width for the applicable type of the driveway in Figure 1 S-1 of these regulations The width of the curb cut at Driveway B will be reduced from 35 to 20 feet. This driveway will also be reconfigured to allow only vehicles turning right into the site. Right turns out of the site, and left turns into and out o e site will be eliminated at this driveway. This will substantially improve the definition of turning and traffic movements into and out of the property. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 5 Champlain Oil Company Kennedy Drive Mobil South Burlington, Vermont e) The relocation of access points farther away from the high -volume intersections As stated above, Driveway A will be relocated further away from the high -volume intersection of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road. The attached Existing Site Plan and Preliminary Site Plan, show the existing driveways on the site and the proposed driveway configuration, respectively. The impact of the proposal on the overall traffic volumes and levels of service at intersections in the immediate vicinity of the project. ud i'� cl'to The increase in traffic during the PM peak hour is limited to approximately 10'�vehicles entering and exiting the site across three entrance drives. The effect on the level of service at the Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive intersection is negligible (10 new trips versus +/- 3,000 per hour existing) and does not warrant a complete intersection level of service analysis. g) Any other criteria contained within the PUD review or other factors as the Development Review Board deems relevant, subject to consultation with and approval by the Director of Public Works. Conclusion Based on the results of the review and analysis of the existing and projected traffic conditions in the area of the site, the following conclusions are presented. ❑ Based on site specific traffic volume counts, the existing site traffic is 15% less than predicted by the ITE Trip Generation Manual for similar land uses. The actual number of average PM peak hour trips is 146 vehicles entering and exiting. ❑ The project is expected to generate approximately 10 additional vehicles (a 6.9% increase) entering and exiting the site during the afternoon (PM) peak hour, occurring between 4:30 and 5:30 PM based on local data obtained in Vermont at similar facilities. Local trip generation rates were used because ITE did not have applicable data to estimate vehicle traffic from a gas station/ convenience store/ deli -style restaurant, as recommended by both ITE and the South Burlington zoning. ❑ It is estimated that the majority of trips generated by the deli -style restaurant (e.g. Subway) will occur during the noon peak hour, based on the existing number of deli patrons and the nature of the sandwich business documented at similar facilities. The proposed project will not create significant traffic increases during the AM or PM peak hours. The site and adjacent roadways have adequate capacity to handle the estimated increase in trips. ❑ Based on the relatively small increase (t6.9%) of project generated PM peak hour trips, the trip distribution between three access points, and the time of day the majority of the additional trips will occur, traffic circulation between the site and the street network will continue to operate in a safe and efficient manner. ❑ The proposed project is in conformance with the South Burlington Land Development Regulations and the Traffic Overlay District. Several improvements are being proposed to improve site circulation, efficiency, safety, and access management. The result is a net benefit with respect to traffic flow within the site and at the access points on Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 6 N South Burlington, Vermont E Overlay Districts Map s Town Boundary Roads Airport Approach Boundary Traffic Overlay District Balance of Restricted Roads -Zone 5 eHigh Volume Roadway Segment - Zones 2,3, & 4 Major Intersections - Zone 1 City Center Design Review Overlay Districts BE DESIGN DISTRICT 1 EM DESIGN DISTRICT 2 F DESIGN DISTRICT 3 loodplain Overlay 100 Yr. Floodplain Scenic View Protection Overlay Districts DORSET PARK HINESBURG RD. -NORTH HINESBURG RD. - SOUTH SPEAR ST. - ALLEN RD. SPEAR ST. - OVERLOOK PARK SPEAR ST. - RIDGE Bartlett Brook Overlay District ZONE E ZONE C , —� ZONE B Sources: View protection zone, Bartlett Brook P v 1 watershed boundary, and airport approach cones drafted onto 1:5000 1988 orthophotos. Floodplain maps transferred to Vermont state plane coordinate sys tem . Produced by the City of South Burlington. February 14, 2001. Disclaimer. The accuracy of information presented is determined by its sources: errors and omissions may exist. The City of South Burlington is not responsible for these. Questions ofon the ground location can only be resolved by site inspections, and/or surveys by a registered surveyor. Hence this map is not sufficient for delineation of features on the ground. This map identifies the presence of features, and may indicate relationships between features, but is not a replacement for surveyed information or engineering studies. No Text No Text Mobil SouthKennedy Drive & Hinesburg Road •• Weekday• mmmmmmmmm000 �mmmmmmmmm000 �1 mmmmmmmmm000 ..mmmmmmmmm000 „mmmmmmmmm000 �mmmmmmmmm000 mmmmmmmmm000 ..mmmmmmmmm000 NOW „1mmmmmmmmm000 �mmmmmmmmm000 mmmm�mmmm000 .. mmmmmmmmm000 „mmmmmmmmm000 �mmmmmmmmm000 � �mm��mmmm000 ..mmmmmmmmm000 - mmmmmmmmm000 mmmmmmmmm000 mmmmmmmmm000 .. mmmmmm�mm000 ,,mmmmmmmmm000 ��mmmmmmmmoo© mmm mmm mm� o00 ..mmm�mmmmm©o© • ©©mmm©©©moom 6:45 AM 4 5 9 3 21 5 51 6 11 12 13 25 AM Peak Hour 7:00 AM 5 8 13 5 2 7 6 7 13 16 17 33 In Out Total 715 AM ' `,.? ., 9 5 2 7 5 6 11 14 13 27 61 GO 121 M `. 6 7 Nf ,13 ' 13 "4 4` 3 1 7 _ 5 6 6 7 9 13 15 16 16 ' 17 17 33 33 ;1M '. 5 `; 4 9 41 31 71 61 6 12 15 13 28 8:15 AM 1 7 6 13 6 3 9 4 6 10 17 15 32 8:30 AM 7 6 13 6 3 9 5 7 12 18 16 34 8:45 AM 5 9114 5 3 8 6 8 14 16 20 36 9:00 AM 5 5 10 5 3 8 6 8 14 16 16 32 9:15AM 6 5 11 4 3 7 6 7 13 16 15 31 9:30 AM 5 5 10 5 2 7 5 5 10 15 12 27 9:45 AM 4 6 10 5 2 7 4 9 13 13 17 30 10:00 AM 4 4 8 5 2 7 5 6 11 14 12 26 10: 15 AM 5 4 9 4 2 6 5 5 10 14 11 25 10:30 AM 4 5 9 5 2 7 4 7 11 13 14 27 10:45 AM 5 7 12 3 2 5 5 7 12 13 16 29 11:00 AM 5 4 9 5 2 7 4 6 10 14 12 26 Une IVa 11:15 AM 4 5 9 4 2 6 4 7 11 12 14 26 11:30 AM 5 4 9 4 3 7 4 6 10 13 13 26 11:45 AM 6 6 12 4 2 6 5 6 11 15 14 29 12:00 PM 7 7 14 5 2 7 9 9 18 21 18 39 12:15 PM 7 8 15 4 1 5 6 9 15 17 18 35 12:30 PMJ 7 101 17 51 31 8 71 8 15 19 21 40 12:45 PM 7 6 13 5 2 7 7 8 15 19 16 35 1:00 PM 7 6 13 6 4 10 7 7 14 20 17 37 115 PM 4 5 9 3 2 5 6 7 13 13 14 27 1:30 PM 7 7 14 5 2 7 8 8 16 20 17 37 1:45 PM 7 6 13 5 3 8 5 7 12 17 16 33 2:00 PMJ 6 6 12 6 2 8 6 8 14 18 16 34 2:15PM 8 6 14 5 3 8 6 10 16 19 19 38 2:30 PM 5 6 11 6 2 8 7 10 171 18 18 36 2:45 PM 6 6 12 6 4 10 8 10 18 20 20 40 3:00 PM 7 6 13 5 2 7 5 8 13 17 16 33 3:15PM 7 6 13 5 3 8 7 9 16 19 18 37 3:3—OP M 5 7 12 8 3 11 5 9 14 18 19 F 37 3:45 PMJ 71 7 14 8 21 10 51 9 14 20 1 8—F 38 4:00 PM 7 6 13 6 3 9 7 10 17 20 19 39 PM Peak Hour 4:15 PM 5 6 11 7 2 9 5 9 14 17 17 34 In Out Total 4:30 PM 7 5 12 7 3 10 7 8 15 21 16 37 75 71 146 4:45 PM 4 7 11 6 1 7 6 10 16 16 18 34 5:00 PM 6 5 11 7 3 10 6 10 16 19 18 37 5:15 PM 5 6 11 8 3 11 6 10 161 19 19 38 2of2 Intersection Kennedy Drive and Mobil Entrance Date 3/10/2004 Counter AAL Reaular Street Name Kennedy Drive --Eastbound Kennedy Drive --Westbound Mobil Entrance --Northbound Mobil Entrance--Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 7 193 1 0 180 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 4:15 PM 3 176 0 0 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4:30 PM 5 189 0 0 152 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 4:45 PM 4 180 A 0 201 1 0 0 0 2 0 8 5:OO PM 12 241 0 0 210 5 0 0 0 1 0 4 5:15PM 4 197 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 5:30 PM 2 184 0 0 164 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 5:45 PM 2 163 0 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Total 26 825 0 0 772 10 0 0 0 8 0 19 % Heavy Vehicles 4% 2% 1 % 10% Heaw Vehicles Street Name Kennedy Drive --Eastbound Kennedy Drive --Westbound Mobil Entrance --Northbound Mobil Entrance--Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 0 10 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15PM 0 10 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00PM 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15PM 1 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30PM 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour HV Tot. 1 18 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drivewav B Street Name Kennedy Drive --Eastbound Kennedy Drive --Westbound Mobil Entrance --Northbound Mobil Entrance--Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 2 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 2 4:15PM 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00PM 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 5:15PM 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 5:30PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 4 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 2 0 5 TOTAL 402 386 361 403 480 416 359 368 Intersection Hinesburg Road and Mobil Entrance Date 3/11/2004 Counter RPO Regular Street Name Mobil Entrance --Eastbound Business --Westbound Hinesbur Road --Northbound Hinesburg Road--Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 2 0 4 0 1 2 2 111 4 0 103 2 4:15 PM 2 1 5 7 1 1 3 95 0 0 99 1 4:30 PM 3 0 6 3 0 4 1 136 3 0 90 4 4:45 PM 5 0 4 5 1 1 2 99 1 0 117 1 5:00 PM 4 0 4 1 0 3 3 143 2 0 105 5 5:15 PM 7 0 10 1 0 2 3 124 0 0 132 6 5730 PM 5 0 7 2 0 0 4 77 0 1 93 4 5:45 PM 3 1 8 0 0 2 3 112 0 0 92 6 Total 20 0 24 10 1 10 9 507 6 0 449 16 % Heavy Vehicles 5% 1 % 1 % Trucks Street Name Mobil Entrance --Eastbound Business —Westbound Hinesburg Road —Northbound Hinesburg Road--Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5:15PM 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Total Heavy Veh's 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 TOTAL 233 218 253 241 272 286 193 228 � N�pLft o�(- i�c.,f-5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 FEBRUARY 2004 7. Site Plan Application #SP-04-01 of William A. Burnett to amend a previously approved site plan for a 2,000 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting 400 sq. ft. to medical office, 1996 Williston Road: The applicant had no issues with the staff comments or with the draft motion. He did note that the correct address for this particular office is 2002 Williston Road. Mr. Belair said he will check on this as a matter of record. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plat Application #SP-04-01 of William A. Burnett subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Sketch plan application #SD-03-84 of Barbara Neff to subdivide a 16.3 acre parcel into two lots of 0.51 acres (lot A) and 15.79 acre (lot B), 700 Hinesburg Rd: Question of access to lot B was raised. Mr. Belair said chances are that there will be future development, and the road will become a public road. He noted that Pizzagalli has control over that. Mr. Dinklage said Pizzagalli is aware of the situation. He added that the Board would prefer that any development on the applicant's lot access off the new road. He asked whether the applicant has any idea when they will be coming in with development plans. The applicant said possibly within a year or so. Mr. Dinklage noted the need to get the wetlands assessed by a wetlands expert and also the need to talk with the Rec Path Committee to get their thoughts. Mr. Kupferman asked how many units would be allowed on lot B. Mr. Belair said 4 per acre with a PUD. The question of combining preliminary and final plats was raised. Mr. Belair had no problem as this is a minor subdividion. . Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-03-76 of Champlain Oil Company for a planned u 't development consisting of. 1) razing an existing 1775 sq. ft. service station with convenience store building, and 2) constructing a 3000-4000 sq. ft. convenience store with a short order restaurant having an unknown number of seats in conjunction with a service station use consisting of four pumps (8 fueling positions) and a 2200 sq. ft. canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Mitchell of Champlain Oil distributed information to the Board. He showed plans of the existing conditions and the proposed plan. He also noted that since the last presentation, the - 4 - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 FEBRUARY 2004 applicant has met with the Homeowners Association of the adjoining residential complex. Plans were reviewed at that meeting and a number of concerns were expressed. The plan being presented reflects changes resulting from meeting with the residents: 1. The setback at the back of the building has been increased from 40' to 50'. 2. On the Hinesburg Rd. Side, 27 ft. of parking has been eliminated and made into green space (this was shown on the plan). 3. Parking spaces were relocated (shown on the plan). 4. In the area between this property and Manor Woods a berm has been added to keep headlights from shining into residences. 5. The building size will be 3100 sq. ft. with 16-20 restaurant seats. There will be 31 parking spaces provided, including spaces at the pumps. Mr. Dinklage noted the Board will be hard pressed to approve an increase in building size since the existing coverage is already exceeded. The applicant noted their sales volume is going down. Mr. Dinklage said there is no assurance that it will not go up again. Mr. Belair stressed that trip generation numbers are based on the use. Mr. Dinlage added the DRB is bound to follow those guidelines. He said it is possible the applicant will have to make adjustments to keep within the existing limits. Regarding traffic, Mr. Belair said the Board can require that the applicant do a trip generation analysis and can also invoke technical review and have the city hire someone to do this at the applicant's expense. He felt the Board needs a professional review of traffic. The applicant said they have a similar use in Essex Junction and the traffic from the Subway use does not conflict with AM or PM peak hour traffic. He asked if the Board can make adjustments to the traffic overlay, Mr. Dinklage said it can if there are significant improvements made to traffic flow on the site. He noted that the site presently generates 171 PM peak hour trips. An audience member noted that people use the gas station as a cut -through to avoid the light at Kennedy Drive /Hinesburg Rd. intersection. Mr. Dinklage said that is illegal and is very dangerous. Members then considered the width of curb cuts. Mr. Belair noted that this is measured from the property line. Mr. Dinklage suggested reducing the radius on the Hinesburg Rd. side to add more green space since trucks only turn left from that curb cut. The applicant said they would consider that as it seemed reasonable. Mr. Belair noted that the maximum allowable width for a curb cut - 5 - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 FEBRUARY 2004 is 36 feet measured at the property line. A neighbor noted that her bedroom is adjacent to this property and she hears a lot of noise. She asked that existing trees not be removed since that would make it worse. The applicant said none of those trees will be removed. The neighbor said the proposed building will be 10 feet closer. Mr. Dinklage asked where loading/unloading will take place with the new building. The applicant said 90% will be at the front door whereas with the current building 90% is done through the back. Mr. Dinklage said that is important for neighbors, although the tankers will still be coming to the same place. The applicant said the trash/lawn equipment shed will be moved 10 ft. further from the property line with the neighbors. Mr. Dinklage asked what will be in the green area where the shed currently is. The applicant said "whatever it takes". Mr. Dinklage asked about the existing footpath. The applicant showed the location and said they will keep it if the neighbors want it. Mr. Dinklage asked how high the berm will be. The applicant said it will be 2 feet higher than the existing area with a 6 foot hedge on top. Mr. Dinklage suggested a berm where the existing shed is located in order to block noise. The applicant said they can do that. Mr. Belair suggested there be a condition that the dumpster pick-up not be allowed before 7 a.m. This has been done in other locations where a residential neighborhood borders a commercial use. Mr. Dinklage noted that if the noise becomes worse, the Board can take action. He cited the Hannaford situation where a noise -blocking fence was required. An audience member questioned whether there could be a requirement for only right turns in at the Hinesburg Rd. curb cut. She cited the back-up in traffic waiting for left turners into the applicant's property. The applicant did not feel that was workable. Mr. Dinklage suggested that the easternmost access on Kennedy Drive become an entrance only, right turn in. With the new median on Kennedy Drive, this would help to move traffic. He felt the entrance could be contoured and curbed to make it obviously an entrance only. The applicant was not receptive to that idea since they now have something that works and don't want to give it up. Mr. Dinklage raised the issue of landscaping in the parking areas. Mr. Belair said there are some islands that would be appropriate for landscaping. A brief review was made of things for the applicant to consider. - 6 - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 FEBRUARY 2004 As there was no fiirther business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m. y3-/�►Y Date - 7 - GAR -at - •sQ, L,.^ r2 \\ (11 — 6� 4/. (,\Fv1� CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY, INC. \ \ \ \ \\ -kT a� \ x19 PA RlQ U� P.O. BOX 2126 I \ 111 1' I \ \ \ \ \ SOUTH BURLINGTON • YERkONT i35407 \ a'-+ 3 \\ X ?r, V.ER46E :...1.� �-�o /; �.(3LD{�a dpy PROPERTY OFNING -THIS CHAMPLAIVW'OJL Cq 1NC AND sHALi tvaT t� REPRODUCED \\ / 1 i I I I I I T / / / `. w 5�I E�ia6��E�r WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION LII � PHONE r nz-13CA-53a� 1 1 I:I i.t .� _- _CHAMPI IN OIL 00: _ 911 Yy• p� C ��p�pp ('` ��y� .X+ail...l _I.i \.... ,.. \ tr _ / ''�93 \yr,_.__-_i \\ "2 Y3i U�. E. fY-tiixt 62 :�,G. - 1 - _ \ �• 6i9// /' 15z / 1•- \\ X 4i\ \ 7_ \ ` C�JE.G'T CONSULTANT/DESIGNER' l 3ei�l£'os .! �j� Ile T � �° a\ ``� \`\ • I ` V. \� • 1,."_�`P�1�IF f _ Ff�� .... � 1 _ -,� l� '• �� \ F��. 7isl-zlX>� -�:.. _ .. _ �--- �v _,�� ` �. \, / W41-4i AAa3: Pry _ P + t\\ D ! y ooYi x97.87 � rf. ,X92� •/ 10030.40 �I /� ---• `\ �\ tot (� / �•, x ,? uo� ,,. \ i ty —oil �„•. xX. �J. 4• S. •, i, !.,., .. .. i t 2.31 Oi i \ -f• � , Y -- 1 e t a •� 0t .4 227 _ \ X97 i L. _ 7. 1 491.1 k / ! , ix 2 a 1 \ � i 1i .- .. • 1H9 ,.r- -- - — _ 7i.._- 's° .i.. _ :L;, ( -t i" `fi'-- ,�ti., -2�`'• A8 f l 74...'GON-P -- `. CfiB•:. i - }.,-r - - 1•} , 96.7 Git z5o211� �- A :- , w i'' ;.��--�• O ..: � \_yam .I s AV LL 2 1 ♦ u _.: __179`.i. 48 000mf SL 4%'*. .`•' Xy 4y3; / u ~- ..�t�r,,• �•� c PAD (�_ 7- &69/ 1 \ r 3" / {t • .T _.n..ra..._._..j_, •.'' E _ n _ '\�.�.. _.-w. _ ` __ 243 .... .... _.. �86_ _. _..- PVi. i 1B®AR 87 8 270• 1 mil "\•_ U\234 ;!�//'''c`-- `_a\._------ --e/P 24r �: —�`� _p 797� ---- ME ''� I / X98-75 _t 1 - s. �' — --- .• _ + XCQ \\ xE� _ -- —� _ ----s� -- _ UN -= ,ea --——�oHP :9e Q -- ----Pbo X—. ------9g- ..—_— —,•n—;�� _---- see c cRe L- ----W------xEs.3s xE%sw----- - s . ---- ,ems _ �s -- - _---- ' 261 / v - --__ ------X-9a.nt------"X --'-- m--------'----"ii . B�CRB - xP, 4.. .. &1 _. �. —_._ — —xC cRe X9811. P _ ..--. - C—cRB 201 c_CR13 KENNEDY DRIVE Bare 259 ,) ) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 17, 2004 Paul Wamsganz Champlain Oil Company, Inc. P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 110 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Wamsganz: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the February 3, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date- January 29, 2004 \drb\sub\champlain_oil\sketch.doc Plans received: October 21, 2003 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT— 110 KENNEDY DRIVE SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-03-76 Agenda #9 Meeting Date: February 3, 2004 Owner Applicant C. D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership Champlain Oil Company, Inc. c/o Champlain Oil Company, Inc. PO Box 2126 PO Box 2126 S. Burlington, VT 05407 S. Burlington, VT 05407 Engineer/Designer Property Information Paul E. Wamsganz Tax Parcel 0970-00110-C Champlain Oil Company, Inc. Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial P.O. Box 2126 (R7-NC) District-, Traffic Overlay District — Zone S. Burlington, VT 05407 5 District ± 0.9 Acres Location Map b Q Subject Propeft� ELL— Aw6hawl A ..... .: ., y��II.y �1.' y :. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\su b\cham plain oiksketch.doc Champlain Oil Company, Inc., hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing an existing 1,775 square foot service station with a convenience store building and 2) constructing a 3,000 to 4,000 square foot convenience store with short order restaurant having an unknown number of seats in conjunction with a service station use consisting of four (4) pumps (8 fueling positions) and a 2,200 square foot canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive. The subject property contains approximately 0.9 acres and is located in the Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial (R7-NC) District and the Traffic Overlay — Zone 5 District. The South Burlington Development Review Board reviewed the subject application at its meeting on December 16, 2003 (minutes attached), but continued it until February 3, 2004 to give the applicant time to submit additional information. Specifically, the Development Review Board asked the applicant to: 1) consider redesigning the site plan to eliminate one (1) of the access points on Kennedy Drive, 2) consider redesigning the site plan to decrease the front yard coverages, 3) meet with the abutting neighbors in the Manner Woods Condominiums, and 4) submit traffic counts and/or a traffic study for the subject property. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on October 21, 2003 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Requirements F R7-NC Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 39,500 SF �l Max. Building Coverage 40%% 10% �l Max. Total Coverage 40% 52% ♦ Min. Front Setback 30 ft. 23 ft. �l Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a ♦ Min. Rear Setback 65 ft. 40 ft. Max. Front Yard Coverage(s) 30 ft 72%; 85% Max. Building Height 40 ft. 30 ft. zoning compliance ♦ waiver required Setbacks The proposed project meets the rear setback requirement for the R7-NC Zoning District, as outlined in Table C-2 of the Land Development Regulations, but does not meet the 65' setback requirement from a residential district boundary, as required pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(1) of the Land Development Regulations. The subject lot is triangular and has frontage on two (2) public street, therefore it does not have a side yard. The front setback is violated by the existing canopy CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch doc structure. Staff estimates the front yard setback at approximately 23'. However, the canopy will remain unchanged, so the setback encroachment will not be made worse by the proposed project. Pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(2) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board may permit new or expanded non-residential uses within the 65' setback, and may approve a modification of the width of the required setback and/or landscaped buffer. In doing so, the Development Review Board shall find that the proposed lighting, landscaping, and/or fencing to be provided adjacent to the boundary of the residential district will provide equivalent screening of the noise, light, and visual impact of the new non-residential use to that which would be provided by the standard setback and buffer requirements. However, in no case may the required side or rear setback be reduced below the standard requirement for the zoning district in which the non- residential use is located. 1. Pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(2) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit, with the next plan submittal, evidence that the proposed lighting, landscaping, and/or fencing to be provided adjacent to the boundary of the residential district will provide equivalent screening of the noise, light, and visual impact of the new non-residential use to that which would be provided by the standard setback and buffer requirements. Front Yard Coverage Pursuant to Section 3.06(H) of the Land Development Regulations, no more than 30% of the required front setback shall be used for driveways and parking and the balance shall be suitably landscaped and maintained in good appearance. The existing front yard coverages on the property are 72% and 85%, which exceeds the current limits as set forth in the Land Development Regulations. Staff notes that these front yard coverages are in existence today and will not be made worse through the proposed project. Since the December 16, 2003 Development Review Board meeting the applicant has stated that he will not be able to reduce the front yard coverages on the site without reducing the setback between the proposed structure and the abutting residential property. Staff feels this is an issue that the applicant and the Development Review Board can discuss at the meeting on February 3, 2004. 2. The plans should be revised to make all reasonable attempts to reduce the front yard coverages to come into closer conformance with Section 3.06(H) of the Land Development Regulations, prior to the next submittal of plans. Traffic Overlay District — Zone 5 Pursuant to Section 10.02(G) of the Land Development Regulations, a property in Zone 5 of the Traffic Overlay District can generate up to 45 peak hour trip ends per 40,000 square feet of land area. The subject property contains approximately 39,500 square feet of land area. Thus, the property may generate a maximum of 44 P.M. peak hour trip ends. According to the ITE 6th Edition, the existing use on the property generates approximately (1,775 square feet x 96.37 trip ends) 171 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The applicant should submit information on the allocated square footage for the convenience store portion of the proposed building vs. the short-order restaurant portion of the proposed building. In addition, the applicant shall submit information regarding the number of seats the proposed short- order restaurant will contain. These numbers will allow staff to accurately calculate the traffic impacts of the proposed use. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\su b\cham plain oiksketch.doc 3. The applicant should submit, with the next plan submittal, information on the allocated square footage for the convenience store portion of the proposed building vs. the short-order restaurant portion of the proposed building. In addition, the applicant should submit information regarding the number of seats the proposed short-order restaurant will contain. In addition, staff feels the applicant should submit a traffic impact study that analyzes the traffic impacts of the proposed project with two scenarios. The first scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the roads as they exist today. The second scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the proposed median on Kennedy Drive, which would prohibit left-hand turns in and out of the subject property at the easterly most curb -cut on Kennedy Drive. The Development Review Board asked the applicant, at the December 16, 2003 meeting, to submit traffic counts and/or a traffic impact study for the subject property. The applicant will be presenting traffic count data from a property in a neighboring community with the same use to the Development Review Board at the meeting on February 3, 2004. Staff feels this is sufficient for the sketch plan review of this project, but that more detailed information will be necessary prior to preliminary approval. 4. The applicant should submit, with the next plan submittal, a traffic impact study that analyzes the traffic impacts of the proposed project with two scenarios. The first scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the roads as they exist today. The second scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the proposed median on Kennedy Drive. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the Land Development Regulations the Development Review Board shall consider the following in its review of subdivision and Planned Unit Development (PUD) applications: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must obtain final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 5. Occupancy shall not take place in the proposed building until the applicant has obtained final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 6. The South Buffington Water Department shall review and comment on the plans, prior to final approval. 7. If needed, the applicant shall obtain wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hoover, prior to final approval. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\chamolain oil\sketch doc DRB may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 8. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. In making this finding the DRB may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. Access to the property will remain via the existing two (2) 34' wide curb -cuts off of Kennedy Drive and the one (1) 42' wide curb -cut off of Hinesburg Road. Pursuant to Section 15.12(D) of the Land Development Regulations, staff recommends that this curb -cut be reduced to the maximum allowed width of 36'. Circulation appears to be sufficient within this site. At this time no traffic management strategies are proposed. However, staff has suggested that the applicant submit a traffic impact study with next plan submittal. Any traffic management strategies that are recommended through that traffic study should be incorporated into the plans. At the meeting on December 16, 2003, the Development Review Board requested that the applicant explore the possibility, in conjunction with the Director of the South Burlington Public Works Department, of eliminating one (1) of the curb -cuts on Kennedy Drive. The applicant did contact the Public Works Department about this issue. In a memorandum dated January 8, 2004 (attached), Bruce Hoar, the Director of Pubic Works, stated that the design that the applicant has proposed for this site has been incorporated into the plans for the Kennedy Drive Project, and therefore design changes to the applicant's site plan are not warranted. 9. The plans should be drawn to scale for the next plan submittal The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. In making this finding the DRB shall utilize the provisions of Article 12 of these Regulations related to wetlands and stream buffers, and may seek comment from the Natural Resources Committee with respect to the project's impact on natural resources. There are no wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, or unique natural features on the site. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff believes the proposed development is in keeping with the goals for development within the Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial (R7-NC) District, as set forth in Section 4.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch doc Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Staff feels this requirement is met The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided. 10. The South Burlington Fire Chief should review and comment on the plans prior to final approval. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. The plans depict existing pedestrian paths connecting the subject property to the property to the northwest. Staff is concerned that these paths, although desirable for pedestrian access, will create openings in the vegetated buffer, thereby reducing its effectiveness as a buffer. Since the applicant is requesting to place the proposed building 25' closer to the property boundary than allowed, the Development Review Board should weigh the impact of these pedestrian paths. 11. The applicant should include stormwater, sidewalk, landscaping, utility line, and lighting details with the next plan submittal. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with rift �itnitt nnri rnar/way plane and maintenance ctanr/arrlc, Again, the applicant should include stormwater, sidewalk, landscaping, utility line, and lighting details with the next plan submittal. The City Engineer reviewed the sketch plans for the proposed project and provided comments in a letter dated November 26, 2003 (attached). 12. The applicant should revise the plans to comply with the City Engineer's comments, as outlined in his letter dated November 26, 2003, prior to submittal of the next plans. 13. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Pursuant to Appendix A.9 of the Land Development Regulations, luminaries shall not be placed more than 30' above ground level and the maximum illumination at ground level shall not exceed an average of three (3) foot candies. Pursuant to Appendix A.10(b) of the Land Development Regulations, indirect glare produced by illumination at ground level shall not exceed 0.3 foot candles maximum, and an average of 0.1 foot candles average. 14. The applicant shall submit a lighting point by point plan with the next plan submittal CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch doc The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the project is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Regulations for the R7-NC Zoning District. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. According to Table 13-1 of the Land Development Regulations, a service station with a convenience store requires ten (10) parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). The proposed 3,000 to 4,000 square foot building will require between thirty (30) and forty (40) parking spaces, depending on the actual size of the proposed building. The short-order restaurant will be required to provide parking at a rate of twelve (12) spaces per 1,000 square feet of GLA. The plans currently depict thirty-one (31) parking spaces (23 striped spaces and 8 fueling stations). Thus, with the parking arrangement, as depicted on the plans submitted on October 21, 2003, the site could support a 3,100 square foot building. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. No bicycle parking facilities are shown for the site. 15. The applicant should determine the actual size of the proposed building and submit plans that reflnr-t this htidrlinn ci7e With thn nett ninn cziihmiffni 16. The proposed parking spaces should be in conformance with Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. 17. The plans should be revised to depict a bicycle parking facility, prior to submittal of the next plans. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable There are parking spaces located in the front of the proposed building and on the sides of the proposed building. Staff feels the parking space layout is sufficient to meet this requirement. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. Staff feels the height and scale of the proposed building are compatible with the site and the existing buildings in the area. The height of the building will be approximately 30' and will not exceed the portion of the building that is already present. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch doc 18. Building elevation plans of the proposed building should be submitted with the next plan submittal. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Architectural details were not submitted by the applicant. 19. Architectural details of the proposed building should be submitted with the next plan submittal. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed project is located in the R7-NC Zoning District and related harmoniously to the existing buildings, roads, and terrain in the area. Staff feels the proposed building relates harmoniously to the site and the existing buildings in the area. It is staff's opinion that the subject property would relate more harmoniously to the Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive if the front yard coverage was reduced to come into closer compliance with the Land Development Reaulations_ Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The subject property is a corner lot with frontage on two (2) public streets. It is abutted by a residential development to the northwest. Staff does not see it necessary to require any access or access easements to the abutting property. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\chamolain oil\sketch doc All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not depict a dumpster(s) for the subject property. 20. The plans shall be revised to clearly depict the location and screening of any proposed dumpsters or other facilities to handle solid waste, prior to the next submittal of plans. Landscaping and Screening Requirements 21. The applicant should submit a landscape plan and a landscape budget with the next plan submittal. This landscape plan and budget should be in compliance with Sections 13.06(F) and 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two and one-half (2.5) inches when measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of planting, shall be provided within each parking area for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of paved area or every ten (10) parking spaces, whichever is greater. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans revised on November 14, 2003 depict adequate snow storage areas. 22. The plans shall be revised to come into compliance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, prior to the next plan ,whmittAl. 23. The City Arborist should review and provide comments on the plans prior to final approval Other At the meeting on December 16, 2003, the Development Review Board asked the applicant to meet with the abutting neighbors in the Manner Woods Condominiums to make sure they were aware of the project and to address any of their major concerns at an early stage in the project. The applicant has stated that he met with the neighbors and that they did not have any major concerns to be addressed at this time. There is a possibility that a representative from the Manner Woods Condominiums will be at the meeting on February 3, 2004. It is staff's opinion that this was a sufficient effort to address the Development Review Board's request at this stage of the review process, as the abutting neighbors will be formerly invited to the preliminary and final plat hearings. 24. No exterior storage outside of the approved screened dumpster storage area shall be permitted. In addition, exterior product display shall not be permitted. 25. The preliminary plans should include a perimeter survey of the property 26. The preliminary plans should note the zoning district boundaries. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 10 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch doc 27. Pursuant to Section 14.05(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the site plan shall be prepared by a registered architect, licensed landscape architect, licensed land surveyor, licensed engineer, or professional land planner. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" Section of this report to the satisfaction of Staff prior to submittal of the preliminary plat plans. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner l CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS 11/26/03 CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY Kennedy Drive -Hinesburg Road 1. Kennedy Drive will be upgraded. Preliminary plans are available at City Street Department office. Any work on Kennedy Drive shall conform with those plans. 2. Plan should include a north arrow, scale, and legend. 3. The westerly side of the site is heavily wooded. Trees that will be removed shall be shown on the plans. South Burlington Street Department 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL., (802) 658-7961 OFPCE 104 LANDFILL Rd Memorandum TO: Development Review Board FROM: Bruce K. Hoar, Public Works Director DATE: January 8, 2004 CC: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator RE: COCO Mobil on Kennedy Drive We met with the Owner and the Owners Rep. for this property during the design process for the update to Kennedy Drive. The application that the owner has made to the Board is consistent to what the city has agreed will work for the Kennedy Drive Project and has been included in the approved plans for the city. The developer has done exactly what we ask for during the design of this project. Therefore design changes are not warranted to the project. Di )ELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 DECEMBER 2003 supposed to be increased as the development went along. It never was. Mr. Belair acknowledged this is true. Mr. Dinklage suggested leaving the plan with the landscaping that was approved and that might give residents some leverage against the developer. Mr. Bolton asked how many foundations are not in the right place. Mr. Belair said 5 or 6. Mr. Bolton felt residents should follow up with the developer on the inconsistencies. Ms. George said she felt that when a builder presents a plan to the city and the city passes it, the city has a responsibility for oversight of that. She added that the precedent of this would let greedy people rule and take over. She felt there needs to be a strategy to oversee that plans which are approved are done as they approval says they should be. Mr. Kupferman recommended taking the "as -built" out of the findings. Mr. Dinklage recommended crafting a motion and then redrawing the findings of fact. Mr. Boucher then moved to approve the boundary line adjustment as requested by Ironwood Condominium Association without any changes to the landscaping plan. Mr. Kupferman seconded.. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Wyand asked if he will still have a problem selling his house. Mr Dinklage said if he does he should come back to the DRB. 4. Miscellaneous supplication #MS-03-06 of The University of Vermont to alter the existing grade of the East Campus Stormwater Facility, 65 Williston Road: Mr. Nedde said they are upgrading the facility per the new regulations. He showed the location and plans of the watersheds, some of which are in the City of Burlington. He also showed the pond designs. Mr. Belair explained that UVM had to come to the Board because they are changing the grade by more than 20 yards. Mr. Bolton asked if there is any chance the pond will be used as a "swimming hole." Mr. Nedde said it will be fenced. Mr. Boucher moved to approve miscellaneous application MS-03-06 of The University of Vermont per the motion as drafted. Mr. Kupferman seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Sketch plan application #SD-03-76 of Champlain Oil Company for a planned unit development consisting of. 1) razing an existing 1775 sq. ft. service station with convenience store building, and 2) constructing a 3000-4000 sq. ft. convenience store with a short order restaurant having an unknown - 3 - r DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAJ 16 DECEMBER 2003 number of seats in conjunction with a service station use consisting of four pumps (g fueling positions) and a 2200 sq. ft. canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Cairns said he bought the property a year ago. He plans to take down the building, then rotate a new building and push it back. The building will then face both streets. Mr. Dinklage asked why the building can't be designed in conformance with the 65 ft. setback. Mr. Wamsganz said they set the building where the trash storage building is now, leaving the pump islands where they are. Mr. Dinklage suggested sliding the building so the corner lines up with the existing building front. Mr. Wamsganz said that would impact parking along Hinesburg Rd. Mr. Dinklage suggested putting parking in back and using it for staff. He reminded the applicant that they are asking for a sizeable setback waiver. Mr. Wamsganz said the site would be screened. Mr. Dinklage asked if the project has been discussed with the neighboring homeowners association. Mr. Cairns said not yet. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will want to hear from the homeowners before the project goes beyond sketch. Ms. Kupersmith said she was reluctant to give a waiver no matter what the homeowners association says. Mr. Cairns said the alternative is to move the building toward the back of the lot. Mr. Dinklage said the Board tries to be sure a proposal is "squeaky clean" and said the burden is on the applicant to do this. He stressed that this is a very busy intersection. Mr. Wamsganz noted that with the upgrade of Kennedy Drive there will no longer be a left turn exit onto Kennedy Drive from the easterly curb cut. Mr. Boucher asked why one of the Kennedy Drive curb cuts can't be removed. That would help with front yard coverage. The other curb cut could then be widened. The applicant felt this would create problems with delivery vehicles. Mr. Dinklage indicated 2 parking spaces that could become green space. Mr. Bolton suggested talking to the state about the design of Kennedy Dr. Mr. Belair said this is a city project, not state, and the median break is a compromise that was agreed upon. He added that all the permits have been secured and the city won't want to change anything. Mr. Belair said the city is asking for a traffic study from the applicant and asked if the Board wants to invoke technical review on traffic. Members felt they did. Mr. Belair said trip ends must include the gas use, short order restaurant, and convenience store. Mr. Dinklage reviewed the major issues: trip ends, front yard coverage and 40 ft. setback. Mr. Boucher moved to continue SD-03-76 until 3 February 2004. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. CONDOS OFOSED DEMO) TO MAW a LAW CARE J % I SWRAOE 1 � KZJW PROPOSED BERM RI1- �OKMD C CO-711A1Cl/S CEDAR HEDGE / ��_ + lof/ TOTAL R' FFD / • SDEWAIK I OANDPr e------------ ---- rf D7 2s z'----- ----_ �^ ----------- ---- o---- --------c------ Fad so 0 m 40 so so w 03 `\ 04 RE--EDP ROAD arRDww2TTs Dr OMW (A"RINUAFE LOCAnO-) oHP-- Kennedy &1 f 6 So. Budh%gton, Vt Ream nary Site Plan tia}cemmw- A" Dom- Rw DOM I G2/02 br PJLUIM 0001 T' - 2W DRUM % ASSL ED %% lAIf7 M(d1Or w NwboA..aoe- w mm KEN NEDY DXNE anpre .w. Few u 0 20 AO 60 00 Coco / MOBIL Kennedy M 16 So. Bw ington, Vt F)dst ft SM Plan DMWMMm0w1 2MXKI —M RoMd Wmmw. I .PP Dum I RIP DMY i OY/ aj,Vj Fi=f 9001 1' - 2V Duo, Fi ASSNO VI ~ 0=& Or for !la! 0mw ON W"m .CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: December 10, 2003 \drb\sub\champlain_oil\sketch.doc Plans received: October 21, 2003 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT— 110 KENNEDY DRIVE SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-03-76 Agenda #6 Meeting Date: December 16, 2003 Owner Applicant C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trust Partnership Champlain Oil Company, Inc. c/o Champlain Oil Company, Inc. PO Box 2126 PO Box 2126 S. Burlington, VT 05407 S. Burlington, VT 05407 Engineer/Desi_gner Property Information Paul E. Wamsganz Tax Parcel 0970-00110-C Champlain Oil Company, Inc. Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial P.O. Box 2126 (R7-NC) District; Traffic Overlay District — Zone S. Burlington, VT 05407 5 District ± 0.9 Acres Location Map � jai .�y� % •.,, r t 4 N.r , u ff r .. � Ar fop— CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOiv 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch.doc Champlain Oil Company, Inc., hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing an existing 1,775 square foot service station with a convenience store building and 2) constructing a 3,000 to 4,000 square foot convenience store with short order restaurant having an unknown number of seats in conjunction with a service station use consisting of four (4) pumps (8 fueling positions) and a 2,200 square foot canopy, 110 Kennedy Drive. The subject property contains approximately 0.9 acres and is located in the Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial (R7-NC) District and the Traffic Overlay — Zone 5 District. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on October 21, 2003 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Requirements R7-NC Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 39,500 SF Max. Building Coverage 40%% 10% Max. Total Coverage 40% 52% ♦ Min. Front Setback 30 ft. 23 ft. �l Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a ♦ Min. Rear Setback 65 ft. 40 ft. �l Max. Front Yard Coverage(s) 30 ft 72%; 85% �l Max. Building Height 40 ft. 30 ft. zoning compliance ♦ waiver required Setbacks The proposed project meets the rear setback requirement for the R7-NC Zoning District, as outlined in Table C-2 of the Land Development Regulations, but does not meet the 65' setback requirement from a residential district boundary, as required pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(1) of the Land Development Regulations. The subject lot is triangular and has frontage on two (2) public street, therefore it does not have a side yard. The front setback is violated by the existing canopy structure. Staff estimates the front yard setback at approximately 23'. However, the canopy will remain unchanged, so the setback encroachment will not be made worse by the proposed project. Pursuant to Section 3.06(I)(2) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board may permit new or expanded non-residential uses within the 65' setback, and may approve a modification of the width of the required setback and/or landscaped buffer. In doing so, the Development Review Board shall find that the proposed lighting, landscaping, and/or fencing to be CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOIv 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch.doc provided adjacent to the boundary of the residential district will provide equivalent screening of the noise, light, and visual impact of the new non-residential use to that which would be provided by the standard setback and buffer requirements. However, in no case may the required side or rear setback be reduced below the standard requirement for the zoning district in which the non- residential use is located. 1. Pursuant to Section 3.06(1)(2) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit, with the next plan submittal, evidence that the proposed lighting, landscaping, and/or fencing to be provided adjacent to the boundary of the residential district will provide equivalent screening of the noise, light, and visual impact of the new non-residential use to that which would be provided by the standard setback and buffer requirements. Front Yard Coverage Pursuant to Section 3.06(H) of the Land Development Regulations, no more than 30% of the required front setback shall be used for driveways and parking and the balance shall be suitably landscaped and maintained in good appearance. The existing front yard coverages on the property are 72% and 85%, which exceeds the current limits as set forth in the Land Development Regulations. Staff notes that these front yard coverages are in existence today and will not be made worse through the proposed project. 2. The plans should be revised to make all reasonable attempts to reduce the front yard coverages to come into closer conformance with Section 3.06(H) of the Land Development Regulations, prior to the next submittal of plans. Traffic Overlay District — Zone 5 Pursuant to Section 10.02(G) of the Land Development Regulations, a property in Zone 5 of the Traffic Overlay District can generate up to 45 peak hour trip ends per 40,000 square feet of land area. The subject property contains approximately 39,500 square feet of land area. Thus, the property may generate a maximum of 44 P.M. peak hour trip ends. According to the ITE 6`h Edition, the existing use on the property generates approximately (1,775 square feet x 96.37 trip ends) 171 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The applicant should submit information on the allocated square footage for the convenience store portion of the proposed building vs. the short-order restaurant portion of the proposed building. In addition, the applicant shall submit information regarding the number of seats the proposed short- order restaurant will contain. These numbers will allow staff to accurately calculate the traffic impacts of the proposed use. 3. The applicant should submit, with the next plan submittal, information on the allocated square footage for the convenience store portion of the proposed building vs. the short-order restaurant portion of the proposed building. In addition, the applicant should submit information regarding the number of seats the proposed short-order restaurant will contain. In addition, staff feels the applicant should submit a traffic impact study that analyzes the traffic impacts of the proposed project with two scenarios. The first scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the roads as they exist today. The second scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the proposed median on Kennedy Drive, which would prohibit left-hand turns in and out of the subject property at the easterly most curb -cut on Kennedy Drive. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO1v 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch.doc 4. The applicant should submit, with the next plan submittal, a traffic impact study that analyzes the traffic impacts of the proposed project with two scenarios. The first scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the roads as they exist today. The second scenario is the project's impacts on traffic with the proposed median on Kennedy Drive. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board shall consider the following in its review of subdivision and Planned Unit Development (PUD) applications: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must obtain final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 5. Occupancy shall not take place in the proposed building until the applicant has obtained final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 6. The South Burlington Water Department shall review and comment on the plans, prior to final approval. 7. If needed, the applicant shall obtain wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hoover, prior to final approval. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the DRB may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 8. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations_ In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Buffington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. In making this finding the DRB may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. Access to the property will remain via the existing two (2) 34' wide curb -cuts off of Kennedy Drive and the one (1) 42' wide curb -cut off of Hinesburg Road. Pursuant to Section 15.12(D) of the Land Development Regulations, staff recommends that this curb -cut be reduced to the maximum allowed width of 36'. Circulation appears to be sufficient within this site. At this time no traffic management strategies are proposed. However, staff has suggested that the applicant submit a CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO►. 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch.doc traffic impact study with next plan submittal. Any traffic management strategies that are recommended through that traffic study should be incorporated into the plans. 9. The plans should be drawn to scale for the next plan submittal. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. In making this finding the DRB shall utilize the provisions of Article 12 of these Regulations related to wetlands and stream buffers, and may seek comment from the Natural Resources Committee with respect to the project's impact on natural resources. There are no wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, or unique natural features on the site. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff believes the proposed development is in keeping with the goals for development within the Residential 7 — Neighborhood Commercial (R7-NC) District, as set forth in Section 4.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided. 10. The South Burlington Fire Chief should review and comment on the plans prior to final approval. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. The plans depict existing pedestrian paths connecting the subject property to the property to the northwest. Staff is concerned that these paths, although desirable for pedestrian access, will create openings in the vegetated buffer, thereby reducing its effectiveness as a buffer. Since the applicant is requesting to place the proposed building 25' closer to the property boundary than allowed, the Development Review Board should weigh the impact of these pedestrian paths. 11. The applicant should include stormwater, sidewalk, landscaping, utility line, and lighting details with the next plan submittal. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOly 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch.doc Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Again, the applicant should include stormwater, sidewalk, landscaping, utility line, and lighting details with the next plan submittal. 12. The City Engineer should review and provide comments on the plans prior to final approval. 13. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Pursuant to Appendix A.9 of the Land Development Regulations, luminaries shall not be placed more than 30' above ground level and the maximum illumination at ground level shall not exceed an average of three (3) foot candles. Pursuant to Appendix A.10(b) of the Land Development Regulations, indirect glare produced by illumination at ground level shall not exceed 0.3 foot candles maximum, and an average of 0.1 foot candles average. 14. The applicant shall submit a lighting point by point plan with the next plan submittal The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the project is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Regulations for the R7-NC Zoning District. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. According to Table 13-1 of the Land Development Regulations, a service station with a convenience store requires ten (10) parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). The proposed 3,000 to 4,000 square foot building will require between thirty (30) and forty (40) parking spaces, depending on the actual size of the proposed building. The short-order restaurant will be required to provide parking at a rate of twelve (12) spaces per 1,000 square feet of GLA. The plans currently depict thirty-one (31) parking spaces (23 striped spaces and 8 fueling stations). Thus, with the parking arrangement, as depicted on the plans submitted on October 21, 2003, the site could support a 3,100 square foot building. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. No bicycle parking facilities are shown for the site. 15. The applicant should determine the actual size of the proposed building and submit plans that reflect this building size with the next plan submittal. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTGty 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oil\sketch.doc 16. The proposed parking spaces should be in conformance with Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. 17. The plans should be revised to depict a bicycle parking facility, prior to submittal of the next plans. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. There are parking spaces located in the front of the proposed building and on the sides of the proposed building. Staff feels the parking space layout is sufficient to meet this requirement. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. Staff feels the height and scale of the proposed building are compatible with the site and the existing buildings in the area. The height of the building will be approximately 30' and will not exceed the portion of the building that is already present. 18. Building elevation plans of the proposed building should be submitted with the next plan submittal. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Architectural details were not submitted by the applicant. 19. Architectural details of the proposed building should be submitted with the next plan submittal. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed project is located in the R7-NC Zoning District and related harmoniously to the existing buildings, roads, and terrain in the area. Staff feels the proposed building relates harmoniously to the site and the existing buildings in the area. It is staff's opinion that the subject property would relate more harmoniously to the Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive if the front yard coverage was reduced to come into closer compliance with the Land Development Regulations. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO, - 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain oiksketch.doc Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The subject property is a corner lot with frontage on two (2) public streets. It is abutted by a residential development to the northwest. Staff does not see it necessary to require any access or access easements to the abutting property. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not depict a dumpster(s) for the subject property. 20. The plans shall be revised to clearly depict the location and screening of any proposed dumpsters or other facilities to handle solid waste, prior to the next submittal of plans. Landscaping and Screening Requirements 21. The applicant should submit a landscape plan and a landscape budget with the next plan submittal. This landscape plan and budget should be in compliance with Sections 13.06(F) and 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two and one-half (2.5) inches when measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of planting, shall be provided within each parking area for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of paved area or every ten (10) parking spaces, whichever is greater. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans revised on November 14, 2003 depict adequate snow storage areas. 22. The plans shall be revised to come into compliance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, prior to the next plan submittal. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOr. 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\champlain_oil\sketch.doc 23. The City Arborist should review and provide comments on the plans prior to final approval. Other 24. No exterior storage outside of the approved screened dumpster storage area shall be permitted. In addition, exterior product display shall not be permitted. 25. The preliminary plans should include a perimeter survey of the property. 26. The preliminary plans should note the zoning district boundaries. 27. Pursuant to Section 14.05(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the site plan shall be prepared by a registered architect, licensed landscape architect, licensed land surveyor, licensed engineer, or professional land planner. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" Section of this report to the satisfaction of Staff prior to submittal of the preliminary plat plans. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner CIT ' (OF SOUTH BUIRILU\�GTON IDEPARTIMEIVII'Off' PLAPINING & ZONENTG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VER-MOP-71 05403 (80/2) -046-4106 FAX (302) 846-4101 Permit Number SD- 0 so - r1c APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW ,All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax -:,e -12 " , j-"/- d:57 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) <?6 Z --c- 16 2- 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax p� AJ o ic� 60. /A—Jc- 5,3 CFI 4) APPLICA-1\17S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax -9) ki/L e;04,t45y,1 AJ Z 7 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: //0 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separateAse) /0 1775 31 6,--- b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage on property (pro osed buildings and existing buildings to remain) cdc Z Z- r13 d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) V f) Other (list anv other information pertinent to this application not specifics y requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable)„ 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing ZI 41 % V --11c01-- -11 F Proposed e ! n--' % 6v7- = &!I tl GfJ1% = 220U b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing /.1 % Proposed 13,- �% s i?XLc � c.4.vv�.,7,— c) Front yard (along each street) Existin / 0 Proposed % (Jo 7 2 fw ) z `' t Ss 1 a) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) LZ4Zi All 14,-,-J 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) �,& -siTZ-- 6LO—t) bC'T7&)t� 7v �-iC<JTI�f� d2 AIFi L04-177v &J 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL =CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & NIAMING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) ' f�,(ip� �.u0.r'I,uC- 13) ESTEViATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached Five (5) regular size copies and one r eAftced copy (11" xO") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is e. /Z5'6v I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. .1 - �. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT _elf SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not Write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: U/Complete El Incomplete 143 or Designee Dale gas w/convenience: fueling positions mini mart short-order resto TOTAL convenience w/gas: fueling positions TOTAL CA ��.I;. C-c'. Traffic Generation ' Proposed Kennedy/Hinesburg Mobil Station Expansion Current Proposed # /SF trip ends total #/SF trip ends total 8 13.38 107.04 8 13.38 107.04 1775 96.37 171.0568 1750 96.37 168.6475 0 1750 26.15 45.7625 278.0968 321.45 �o-7 w/ ctr, I + Z Cl. 145 i-��-C 'LS•C 8 19.22 153.76 368.17 .,�, I �; '� '2 C C., / k�� I S 3. PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 24, 1984 did not expect to employ more than 3 support staff in the future. He felt that was what the 'Zoning Board had implied in thier approval, but Mr. Poger wanted it spelled out clearly. Mrs. Maher did not like this use in that location. She felt the location was dangerous and that for years the Commission had tried to avoid this type of use in a residential area. Mr. Dugan represented Dr. Guerra and said white pines would be planted along the north and west sides of the property to screen headlights during the short winter days. Mrs. Maher asked where snow would be plowed and Mr. Dugan pointed to an area on the northeast corner, or said it would be taken off the site if necessary. He said they would submit a drainage plan to the City Engineer and that the sidewalk across the drive would remain as is. Regarding the Engineer's comment #3 on his 7/20/84 memo, Mr. Dugan felt that by doing some additional paving in the area where peonies and hydrangeas now grow, they could allow room for cars to back up on this property, without going into Williston Road. Mrs. Maher mentioned making the entrance wide enough so cars could enter and exit at the same time. She wished the City Engineer/Manager would look at the area again. Mr. Dooley asked if they had spoken with Merriam - Graves about an access to their property and Mr. Dugan said they did not think that was a good idea. The Commission felt the area where the peonies and hydrangeas are should be paved. Mrs. Maher saw no hardship here, which is one of the criteria for a use variance. Mr. Poger said the Commission should ask the Zoning Board for a clarification of its stipulation and either the Planner should exercize the approval, or the applicant should return for the next meeting. Mr. Dooley did not feel approval could be conditioned that way and said he would be more comfortable if the applicant returned. He moved that the Commission postpone this for 3 weeks and ask the Zoning Board to clarify the total number of employees allowed by this use variance. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. It was noted that if the Zoning Board allowed 30 staff people, for example, the Commission might deny the plan based on excessive traffic and the overriding health, safety and welfare of the city. Mr. Poger noted that the zoning of this area had come up for discussion several times and the Commission had on each occasion said that it wanted to keep the area residential. He felt this was selective creeping rezoning by the Zoning Board, and that it was the wrong way to do things. He felt the Board should look carefully at changing residential to other uses, and that the city benefitted by not creating commercial corridors down all its streets. The motion carried with Mr. Jacob voting no. Site plan application of Mobil Oil Corporation for the construction of a new 1836 sq. ft. service station and lot renovation, located at the corner of Hinesburg Road Mr. Poger noted that the Commission had had a preliminary discussion of the plan at the last meeting (see under Other Business. Mr. Schmucker, representing Mobil, reviewed the project. The building will be replaced and the pumps upgraded. One curb cut on Hinesburg Road will be removed and the cut- will be 36' wide. The Kennedy Drive cuts will be largly undisturbed, but will be moved and improved. Plantings between the station and the condominiums will be intensified. The location of the easterly curb cut on Kennedy Drive was discussed, with relation to the island in the road, and Mr. Schmucker said that if that was a major issue, they could leave that cut where it is now. Mr. Dooley noted that the curb cuts on this lot were closer to the 4. PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 24, 1984 intersection than allowed by the ordinance, but it was noted that the improvements being made to the lot would benefit the city and in such cases in the past, changes had been allowed under those circumstances. Regarding the City Manager/Engineer's 7/20 memo, Mr. Schmucker did not feel the station would attract large trucks, because they will not offer a discount on diesal fuel, and he added that they felt large trucks could get around on the site. Regarding the sidewalk on Hinesburg Road, Mr. Schmucker noted that the topography was difficult in that area. Mr. Poger suggested putting it on the other side of the road for a length equal to the Hinesburg Road frontage. It would hook to the walk Winding Brook will put in. There were no objections to #s 4 and 5 on the City Engineer's memo. Ms. Bechtel said there should be a 15' strip of green area on the Kennedy Drive side, measuring from the property line. The applicants noted that that would decrease the turning radii on the lot, and that there was a large green area there now. The Commission pointed out that that large green area was city land. After some discussion about requiring an additional 6' strip, the Commission decided that they would not gain that much by requiring it. Mr. Burgess noted that the new station was actually larger than the old one, by 26 sq. ft. Mr. Poger noted that the additional plantings between the station and the condominiums were not required by the city and the city would not enforce that. Mr. Scott Tower went over the proposed plantings, which are all low shrubs, except for some Norway Maples on the Hinesburg Road side. Mr. Poger suggested a winding path between the condominiums and the station, so there would be both access and screening. Mrs. Maher asked if the plantings would be maintained after they were put in and was told they would be. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Mobil Oil Corporation of Albany, New York, for the construction of a new 1836 sq. ft. service station, and lot improvements located.at the corner of Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive as depicted on a plan entitled Proposed Plot Plan, Kennedy Drive and Route 116," and prepared by Mobil Oil, Fairfax, Virginia, dated April 12, 1984 with the followin stipulations: 1. That a revised plan be submitted for the Planner's approval prior to permit showing the following items: a. All access drives shall be no more than 36 feet in width. b. Six parking spaces at the northeastern end of the lot shall be shown. c. The existing curb cut to the east on Kennedy Drive will be maintained, but may be reshaped to aid in traffic flow. d. The traffic island_ on Kennedy Drive shall be shown on the plan. e. The plan shall be altered to show that the site is in South Burlington, Vermont, not BurlinEton, Vermont. 2. That a performance bond for landscapina in the amount of U L2oO9 be_posted prior to permit. 3. That a sidewalk be installed on the north side of Hinesburg Road of a le th a ual to the distance of the property frontage on Hinesburg Road, and a performance bond shall be posted prior to permit in an amount _etermined. by the_City,__E PLANNING COMMISSION 4. That this approval expires in 6 months. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion and all voted for it. f. JULY 24, 1984 Site plan application of Dr. George Boccia for conversion of an existing single family residence into a medical clinic located at 700 Spear Street Ms. Bechtel noted that the Zoning Board had approved the use. Dr. Boccia noted that Spear Street had nowhere near the traffic that Williston Road did, and he said this lot had a better entrance/exit setup than the similar use reviewed earlier tonight did. There is a U-shaped driveway which will provide access to the new parking lot. The lot will be screened with cedar trees. Dr. Boccia said he was an internist, with a specialist in pulmonary medicine. He expected to employ a nurse and a secretary. Ms. Bechtel noted that this was different than the previously heard plan in that the Commission would not be concerned about traffic backing out into a heavily traveled road. Mr. Poger said he would like clarification on the stipulation of only one doctor in this case also. Mr. Jacob felt this case was different from the previous one, feeling that location made a lot of difference. Mr. Poger did not want Spear Street to change from residential to commercial. He felt this was the first step in that process. Mrs. Maher also did not like the use variance. She did not like to see the encroachment. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of George Boccia, for the conversion of a residence to a medical clinic located at 700 Spear Street, as depicted on a plan prepared by Eric M. Rodgers, Design Associates entitled "Proposed Office for Dr. George Boccia, 700 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont", dated June 20, 1984, With the following stipulations: 1. That the Planning Commission give credit for existing landscaping, valued at above the $60 required. 2. That the Planning Commission waive two parking spaces, and limit parking to five spaces. 3. That this approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and it carried with Mr. Poger voting no. Site plan application of Benchmark Restoration for conversion of an existing single family residence into a 2042 sq. ft. office building located at 69 Swift Street Mr. Ed Grimley said there would be two businesses in the building - Benchmark and Lawson Office Products. The drive will be widened to meet the requirements. Nine parking spaces are laid out and there are 3 spaces in the garage. They will try to keep headlight glare out of people's windows during the winter by proper orientation. There will be no interior changes to the building. Mr. Grimley said Benchmark had almost no walk-in or drive-in business and that Lawson did door to door sales of office products. Mr. Grimley was not sure what would be done with the swimming pool. Mr. Dooley moved that -the South Burlington Planning Commissi4_ aRprQye the site plan application of Bill Savage of Benchmark Restoration for the conversion of a residence to 2 offices located at 69 Swift Street as depicted NOV-08-94 Tl1E 12 :3`3 PM ' � P_ 01 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Mobil Dii Cnrnnr;;i-Jon • • •0 .WA• ••1_ 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #), E s torn rnnsultincg 19 Midstate Drive Suite 220, Auburn MA QJ,501 508-832-7444 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Mobil Servi c e Stat i nn, > > n Kennedy _Drive 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE (S)„ -Current-, .ILsr- Gas S .atinn t 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, ## units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) Lighting ITprdrade Atjtl Ai ArA -T.i gb�s- -R€j:aM Area Light ('a:-np Lights, Replace 12 Canopy Downlights, and Relamp all 24 Canopy Lights. 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9) LOT COVERAGE: building S %; landscaped areas Y7 % building, parking, outside storage 5'J % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ NA Landscaping $ 1,910-00 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost') $ i i nug 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Apri 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) V0 Gh Jy Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m 4--5 p.m ; 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p•m 1.3 ) PEAK 141 PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: +� DAYS OF OPERATIO DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING �� City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 24, 1995 Frank Quigley, Jr. Eastern Consulting 19 Midstate Drive, Suite 220 Auburn, MA 01501 Re: Lighting Changes, 110 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Quigley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans no later than Friday, March 3, 1995. If you have any questions, please give me a call. �; Sincerely, � L Ra/ym'cnd J . Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/peh Post -It® Fax Note 7671 Date rT� Cj� / Pa To n , t( L �- From Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # MEMORANDUM To: Project Files -� From: Raymond J. Bela 4r' onin and Planning Assistant Y g Date: February 27, 1995 Re: Preliminary Comments, March 14, 1995 Agenda Items EASTERN CONSULTING - LIGHTING CHANGES - SITE PLAN Site Plan should be revised to show: --- all existing and proposed landscaping --- lot size --- location of nearest fire hydrant --- trash storage building --- at least one (1) handicapped parking space --- existing sidewalk along Hinesburg Road --- bike rack (required under Section 26.253 (b) of the zoning regulations). Other Comments: --- provide gross square footage of service station --- provide details of existing and proposed overhead canopy downlights (i.e., wattage, type of light) --- the 7/24/84 approval required that there be six (6) parking spaces at the north eastern corner of the lot. Site plan submitted shows only five (5) spaces at this location. --- provide point by point lighting plan, a maximum illumination at ground level can not be in excess of an average of three (3) foot candles. WYAND & GRUNVALD - RESUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN Sketch plan should be revised to include the following additional information: --- addresses of owners of record and applicant --- show type of, location, and approximate size of existing water and sewer mains --- location map --- the plan should show clearly to which lot, lot #8A will be merged. The City will not approve the creation of a lot which does not have access to a public street. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: March 14, 1995 agenda items Date: February 21, 1995 CORPORATE WAY - (PETER JUDGE PROJECT) 1. Sidewalks along Corporate Way should be continuous across entrance drives. They should be at a uniform grade and entrance drive ramped to the sidewalks. Entrance curbs should stop at sidewalk. 2. Parking lot drainage should be controlled so that it does not overload the Corporate Way system. MOBIL OIL - KENNEDY DRIVE Lighting must not be objectional to the Manor Woods residents. Shields on fixtures may be necessary. CHIP WARD - WILLISTON ROAD Site plan prepared by Michael Dugan with latest revision dated 1/16/95 is acceptable. SCOTT HASELTON - IMPERIAL DRIVE Plan received February 13, 1995 with revisions showing new property owners is acceptable. WAGNER, HEINDEL & NOYES - SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan dated February 1, 1995 is acceptable. ) ) ' �� ~ �� [ zm�� /�� /��a��[ent , ��_-- " 575 19arset #w e¢t ��utto igurfington, lRermunt 05403 (e02)658'7960 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Planning Commission � FROM: Wallace Possich, Fire Chief DATE: February 21, 1995 RE: Plans Review for March 14, 1995 Meeting I have reviewed the following site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. Boundary Line Revisions Dated 1-25-95 Old Farm Road Acceptable 2. Lot Subdivision (Barone) Dated 2-13-95 Imperial Drive Acceptable ~~�3. Lighting Plan Up -grade Dated 2-10-95 Mobile Oil - Kennedy Drive Acceptable 4. Rocky's Pizza Dated 1-27-95 Dorset Street Acceptable 5. Motel to Offices Dated 2-1-95 428 Shelburne Road Accqptable BALLAST ASSEMBLY— HOUSING i NON CLAMP BARS (2) ADJUSTABLE SOCKET ON CLAP BOLTS (1) —1\� / BRACKET ICAL SERYICE 1RES (BY OTHERS) LAMP SOCKET HOUSING DOOR —/% LATCHES (2) LNG TENON HOD LAP (4OOW 2B SERIES METAL HALIDE) ASKETED MOUNTING d REFLECTOR -NON ENTRANCE HOUSING DOOR HINGES (2) `—ELECTRICAL COMPARTMENT COVER CONCOURSE III FIXTURE DETAILS i a"�rco p p a idaw Woi w r aw¢o� �Vaw a HAD HOLE OVERLAP COVER OACKSIDE OF POLE) UI•4 TIES 441•4 PERT. BARS EOIMIIY SPACED BOLT PROJECTION �.25•MOMI 3.Q' MAX 11'DIA.BOLT CIRCLE / 1.T5'R BS' DMA. BOLT CIRCLE GRADE " ASTM GRADE 50 BASE PLATE SA' 10 D' BOLT CIRCLE j o � \ .4IYM SUITABLE BACKFILL COMPACTED IN IZ' LIFTS £ 50. TO OPTIMUM DENSITY AROUND ENTIRE CIRCUMFERENCE NOTE) ANCHOR BOLT PATTERN SHOULD BE SQUARED TO CURB u)X•.ZS•.O' TURN 1& TS O v� IB)FLAT MMASHERS }.� �r� m Icum —1 BASE PLATE WING SCALE. I'• I'-O' �? J Q NG & BASE PLATE DETAILS a NDARD YARD LIGHT o J Q 2 J a w W Y 3 O O f PROPERTT LINE \/ SEE DETAIL AJ _ SINGLE AND DOUBLE 40OW FIXTURE AREA LIGHT SCALEIS4' • I'-O' .0 30 20 to 0 20 10 5 2 1 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 TWIN FIXTURE 14' MOUNTING HEIGHT 40OW METAL HALIDE INITIAL READING 36000 LUMENS PER LAMP TYPE III DISTRIBUTION BALLAST ASSEMBLY--7 �— MOUSING TENON CLAMP BARS (2) ADJUSTABLE SOCKET TENON CLAMP BOLTS U1 ��\ BRACKET \\ -- POLE CAP ELECTRICALSERVICE OTHERS. E40 WIRES LAMP SOCKET 4�-JC BACK-UP PLATE HOUSING f)L10R LATCHES 12) ELECTRICAL SERVICE HIRES MOIMING TENON / � H00 LAMP UOOW 28 SERIES METAL WEIDEI MOUNTING ARMS GASKE7ED MOl1NTIHO ` REFLECTOR �— _ TENON ENTRANCE /— TENON HOUSING ODOR HINGES (2) � `— ELECTRICAL COMPARTMENT COVER �` MOUNTING BOLTS �' SOIJME POLE CONCOURSE III FIXTURE DETAILS MOUNTING ARM DETAIL HAND HOLE OVERLAP COVER ®ACKSIDE OF POLEI 141 •4 vERT. BARS o . P DIA. POLE 103' S0. BOLT PROJECTION X.25'IIN. Q 5.0' MAX. _ R L75 R NIGH GRADE ATOP T 4TOP OF FOUNDATION UNDAATITI TO FORM TRUE CIRCLE � 1 1 , / HO—Es 1. DEP7M OF FOOTING TO EXTEND BELOW FROST LINE ITYPL 111 •� TIES EDUALLY SPACED 2. SU.nE COMPACTED SUBGRAOE WITH MINIMUM BEARING CAPACITT OF 2.000 PSF.SOIL CONDITION ► BEARING CAPACITY I SUITABLE BACKFILL COMPACTED IN 12'LIFTS SQ. BE VRtFIED IN FIEL0. I TO OPTIMUM DENSITY AROUND ENTIRE CIRCUMFERENCE 3. REIMFCRCING STEEL BARS SWILL BE A MINIMUM ASTM A615. GRADE 60 AND SHALL BE FIELD WIRED IN PLACE. (I) •1 vERT. BAF15 N11Lti25'.3' TLRN NOTE, ANCHOR BOLT PATTERN SHOULD BE SOLIA ED TO CURB \l (8) i1FLAT WASHERS I I\ LOAD H D L 3D PSF 4'-0' 24' 9 60 PSF 1 4'-0' 1 3D' B 7' 1 YP I I CU1B USE 4. PSI CONCRETE FOR FOOTING ^ 1,I 1 D 1 BASE PLATE CONCRETE FOOTING SCALE. I•• 1'-0' DETAIL A CONCRETE FOOTING & BASE PLATE DETAILS FOR STANDARD YARD LIGHT 1. 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 SINGLE FIXTURE 14'MOUNTING HEIGHT 40OW METAL HALIDE INITIAL READING 36000 LUMENS PER LAMP TYPE III DISTRIBUTION /41 •4 TIES EOIIALLT SPACED II' DIA.BOLT CIRCLE LS' DIA BOLT CIRCLE ASTM A3,1 C�RAGE 50 ASE PLATE 8%t' 10 11'BOL CIRCLE c 0 E o O � op O . 0 j o M w� ° o C N _FAC OCR /NYC. �v®1000 � O O � i 4 PRELI MI NARY SUBJECT TO CORRECTION AND AODIT1011 Ta DESIGN FILE w E1 6/9TLFO1DGfk1 Tva-V -PKWMAMNL. 00 J, > KENNEDY DRI' E CANO-11_ LIGH11% t,,N 1) 0 rUCENED VEB I C, 1995 City of So. Burlington ;3RAI..ZTw" 100MIDILTMIla, Mr. 4,1111. 11 -'--411 4 111.11, s'RMV' W, -ENNAQPA"TA. A VE PI NWRI awNCP4L Im.4t, mpmm ma a.= m M� IL am on I, LIGHTING PLAN UP- GRADE 14'24LGT.DWG 4 to p VAFI ADO V41 St fill C. A "Alo 0'a APO roe. 07-Ad SITE PLAN CHECK LIST -j-�- Lot drawn to scale Survey data (distances and lot size) Contours (existing and finished). Existing vegetation and natural features. --- Proposed landscaping (number, variety and size) equal or greater than the required amount in section 19.104 of the Zoning Regulations. --- Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings. ---/ Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. --✓- Zoning boundaries --- Number and location of parking spaces. (RV parking for multi- family projects over 25 units). -l� Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. Location of septic tanks (if applicable). --- Location of any easements. --- Lot coverage information: Building, overall and front yard. --- Location of site (Street # and lot #). t� --- North arrow --- Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. Exterior lighting details (must be downcasting and shielded). -- Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). - ✓ Existing and proposed sidewalks (public). ---/ Sewer calculation - Height of new construction. --j Setbacks (residential district, planned r.o.w., Interstate). -- / C.O. Zone --✓- Bike racks --- Traffic generation --- Traffic Impact fees --- PUD/PCD standarads --- Airport Approach Cone --- Outside storage/display --- F.A.R. --- Lot merger agreement City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 November 17, 1994 Don Gilbride, President Gilbride Electric, Inc. 21 Progress Avenue #2 Chelmsford, Massachusetts 01824 Re: Lighting Changes at 110 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Gilbride: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is in response to your letter of October 12, 1994 with regards to the above referenced project. I apologize for the lateness of this reply. We currently have a substantial backlog of projects to review. The following information must be submitted for review: 1) A site plan drawn to scale of the entire site (similar to the one approved by the Planning Commission in 1984) which identifies all existing and proposed exterior light fixtures. 2) Details (cut -sheets) for all existing and proposed light fixtures. 3) Point by point lighting plan which indicates the level of illumination at ground level in foot candles. The maximum average foot candles permitted is three (3) foot candles. Once the above information is received, your application will be processed. Work can not proceed until approval has been granted. A building permit is not necessary since there are no building codes in South Burlington. To my knowledge, there is no State permit required for this work but I suggest you call the State permit specialist at 802-879-6563 to be absolutely sure. If you have any questions, please give me a call. n rely oe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp • • lk GILBRIDE ELECTRIC, INC. • 21 PROGRESS AVENUE #2 CHELMSFORD, MASSACHUSETTS 01824 (508) 256-5571 FAX (508) 256-6302 October 12, 1994 TO: Electrical inspector Dear Sir, We are implementing a Mobil lighting project in the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Vermont. The project consists of changes shown on the enclosed plans. The specifications on Lighting to be installed along site perimeter is also included. We are scheduled to start and complete the project prior to December 154 1994. Will the electrical permit to perform be all that is necessary for the state and the town to complete the project? If so, may I pursue the permit and schedule work: to be started? All plans shown have been compiled thru actual site assessments. Plans are not to scale but are provided to give general conditions and proposed installation. Thank: you. Sincerely, Don Silbride President D6 / i m im MDM!2RANDDM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: Mobil, Kennedy Drive/Williston Road Date: August 29, 1990 I want to make the Commission aware of a decision made by Dick Ward and myself involving the above reference property. The Williston Road/Kennedy Drive Mobil applied for a permit to convert their existing 6 traditional gasoline pumps to 3 new style pumps. Both Dick and I ruled that site plan review is not required since they will be going from 10 existing pumping sta- tions to 6 pumping stations. They are actually decreasing the number of vehicles which can be serviced at one time. This decision is based on a precedent decision made by the Com- mission on September 5, 1989. When the Gulf Station on Williston Road near the Econolodge applied for a permit to convert their old pumps to the new pump style, I asked for a ruling by the Commission on whether this was an expansion of use. The Commis- sion ruled that since the number of pumping stations would not change, no expansion was occurring and therefore site plan review was not necessary. cc: Dick Ward TO PERRY & SCHMUCKER Attorneys at Law 1480 WILLISTON ROAD P.O. BOX 2323 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 Phone: (802) 863-4558 Robert J. Perry Ronald C. Schmucker Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator City of South Burlingotn South Burlington, Vt 05401 Dear Dick: DATE SUBJECT July 2, 1984 Mobil --Kennedy Drive Route 116 Herewith are four (4) copies of a proposed plot plan showing contour information for drainage purposes. Enclosures RCS:cf Sincerely, Ronald C. Schmucker, Esq. SIGNED Reorder hem # F279 ® Wheeler Groop Inc. 1982 (Rev.) FOLD AT (—) TO FIT GRAYARC 2NIEW ENVELOPE #EW9DW RESIDENCE: POINT RE). for RURAL DELIVERY WIN OOSKI 1 -0 5404 862-4309 'Ell .1 MORTON AqORTON HIGHWAY SALr CALCIUM CIIL0RI,,e JA&IE:S j - LOW' Th SALES REPRESENTATIve - einical corporation 01109 'C, -dl413-31-1,0, Ct IfQ 5 Date Received . By Date Application Completed and Received By By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEtid 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record l�<C- (b) APPl ican t c) Contact Person v� 4 C. 1 v ` ! L d �l< �d IJ �Q��✓ N, S - K)l?�06"(0 0,/--. zlj(" Yc)( 963- VT34- 2) 3) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Cwlw PROPOSED USE (S) : �jC = 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. # o units, floor area, etc.) 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings 160)ce%G (b) Landscaping (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) r I' eO 7) ESTIMATED PROJE& COMPLETION DATE G KJ iS I 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) i% C606& 9) PEAK HOUR (S) OF OPERATION `C b 00 �16-& /jD A4() 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION (' � �y DATE u April 19, 1985 Art J. Perkowski Mobil -oil` Corporation 50 Church Street Albany, New York 12202 Dear Mr. Perkowski: Enclosed is a copy of the City Engineer's comments and stipulations regarding the Kennedy Drive Mobil Station plans. Item #4 pertains to the depressed concrete curbs and #5 pertains to the continuous sidewalk across the driveway on Kennedy Drive. The City plans to construct the sidewalk along Hinesburg Road this summer and will include the area in front of your station. Your cash contribution to this is $3000 as stipulated by the Commission. Please send us a check for this amount. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planer JSB/mcg cc: Sonny Audette M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 7/20/84 4) Brassard Automotive, Williston Road 1. The proposed City street should be constructed to City stand- ards including a sidewalk to the School District easterly boundary with a temporary turnaround. 2. The southerly portion of lot 2 is traversed by an important drainage way which drains a large area. It is flat and requires periodic dredging. An easement of 10 feet in width on each side of the centerline should be reserved for City maintenance access. 5) Bagel Bakery, Dorset Street 1. The entrance drive will start very close to the sidewalk when Dorset Street is reconstructed. A snow plow pushes snow to the right. When plowing an intersecting street as in'this case San Remo Drive, the plow will start on Dorset and come around the curve and a drive close to the intersection on the right side will get more than its share of the snow pushed into/'it. My recommendation would be to eliminate parking spaces 1 and 2 and move entrance easterly. Additional parking could be provided along east side of building. 2. Road opening's shall include repressed concrete curbs across there entire length. 6) Guerra Medical Office, 1540 Williston Road 1. A parking lot drainage plan shall be submitted. 2. Sidewalk shall remain as is across drive. Plan shows it missing. 3. The one long vehicle drive creates problems that may require backing onto Williston Road or back into the parking lot when a conflict , urs. An opening to the adjacent business would help. 7) jMobil Oil Skation, Kennedy Drive -Hinesburg Road 1. If east road opening on to Kennedy Drive is used for exiting vehicles going east on Kennedy Drive it may be difficult to get around island especially if the vehicle is to the far east. 2. A large trailer truck may have difficult getting around after being serviced. If a diesel fuel storage tank is proposed, large trucks will be served and may have difficulty. Memorandum Next week's agenda items July 20, 1984 Page 2 3. A sidewalk should be included along Hinesburg Road. 4. Curb openings shall include depressed concrete curbs across openings. Construction details will be explained to contractor when road opening permit is obtained. 5. Sidewalk along Kennedy Drive shall be continuous across drives and at the same elevation as existing. 9) Boccia, 700 Spear Street I see no major problmes with this proposal 10) Benchmark Restoration, 69 Swift Street I see no major problems with this proposal m0\0A,- C-��Mocvl-p-� fAbu.-� 6x-CC,2,, 3 l Wol\ 6-1-" �- 'Sy"Azt- 's -s�,r-AA — 6-,o \ rt F, A- gry mob AGF STATE OF VERMONT '~ AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building ; t� Montpelier, Vermont 05602051 X AC October 15, 1984 R.J. Perkowski Mobil Oil Construction Albany, New York 12202 Dear Mr. Perkowski: x v RECEIVED S , 17 1984 A/ !I MANAGER'S OFFICE CITY SO BURLING ION RE: South Burlington Vt. 116 L.S. 174+00 Lt. Access to Mobil Station & Construction of a new sidewalk Enclosed for your information and use are copies of our Standard Sheets C-1, C-2a, C-2b and C-3 - for curbs and sidewalk. I understand that the City of South Burlington is requiring Mobil to con- struct a new sidewalk along the easterly side of Vt. 116. As Reg Welch of this office explained to you over the phone, before the sidewalk is constructed we must receive, review and approve plans for the sidewalk; and must receive and process a permit application for the work submitted jointly by the city and your contractor, Engleberth Construction. Regarding your application for a permit for access, upon receipt and approval of your revised plan your application will be processed. Because time restraints, I understand that you may not be able to lay the final course of pavement this fall, therefor, we will set a ccmpletion date of June 1, 1985, with no work in the highway right of way between November 15, 1984 and April 15, 1985. Si"rely, J H. Hoag Utilities Engineer Enc. CC: Ronald C. Schinucker, Esq. Perry & Schmucker P.O. Box 2323, So. Burl., Vt. William J. Szymanski City Manager - So. Burl. 575 Dorset Street So. Burl., Vt. MOW a, � I,�Cti�� ` t"1 C( cS PGt_ C�4 �Y k�•.� n � 1� `/ ov c ck� City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 August 15, 1984 Attorney Ronald Schmucker Schmucker & Perry 1480 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Schmucker: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the Findings of Fact for the site plan approval given by the Planning Commission on July 24, 1984 for Mobil Oil Corporation. Please submit revised plans to me showing the following items: 1) Any proposed reshaping to the northern -most curb cut on Kennedy Drive; 2) The traffic island on Kennedy Drive; 3) Six parking spaces along the north side at the eastern end of the lot. You must submit this revised plan and post the required bonds prior to receiving a building permit. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, "Jc Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 1 E n c 1 tc f l (1��C �:c�cJ, L I'\I .,CIL � I �I � PERRY & SCHMUCKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1480 WILLISTON ROAD P. 0. BOX 2323 SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402 ROBERT J. PERRY RONALD C. SCHMUCKER August 14, 1984 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05401 Attention: Ms. Jane Bechtel City Planner Re: Mobil Oil --Kennedy Drive/Hinesburg Road Dear Jane: RECEIVED AUG 15 1984 MANAGER'S OFFICE CITY SO. BURLINGTON TELEPHONE 863-4558 AREA CODE 802 Enclosed herewith is a revised Mobil Oil Corporation Plot Plan for the Kennedy Drive, Route 116 station in conformity with your July 27, 1984, letter to me. The curb cuts shown on the Plan are 35 feet in width, I presume because Mobil believed that was the City Maximum. I will assume that the width of the curb cuts can, in fact, be 36 feet if Mobil would prefer. In that event, I will get back to you by official letter and we can hand correct the curb cuts in that event to show that they are 36 feet in width. Otherwise we will leave things as they are. I presume that we will be notified of the how, when, who and why of the sidewalk part of the approval. Also please advise as to what needs to be done for the po ng of a $3,000.00 Performance Bond. Thank you for your aPsi tance. Best W' hes, Ron ld C. Schmucker, Esq. RCS:cf Enclosure July 27, 1984 Attorney Ronald Schmucker Schmucker & Perry 1480 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Attorney Schmucker: Enclosed are the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of July 24, 1984. The Mobil Oil Site plan was approved with the following stipulations: 1) That a revised plan be submitted for the Planner's approval prior to permit showtkng the following items: a. All access drives shall be no more than 36 feet in width. b. Six parking spaces at the northeastern end of the lot shall be shown. c. The existing curb cut to the east on Kennedy Drive will be maintained, but may be reshaped to aid in traffic flow. d. The traffic island on Kennedy Drive shall be shown on the plan. e. The plan shall be altered to show that the site is in South Burlington, Vermont, not Burlington, Vermont. 2) That a performance bond for landscaping in the amount of $3,000 be posted prior to permit. 3) That a sidewalk be installed on the north side of Hinesburg Road of a length equal to the distance of the property frontage on Hinesburg Road, and a performance bond shall be posted prior to permit in an amount determined by the City Engineer. 4) That this approval expires in 6 months. You must apply for your building permit or request an extension within 6 months or you will be required to go back to the Planning Commission for a new approval. Attorney Ronald Schmucker J.ly 27, 1984 Page 2 I will send you a copy of the Findings of Fact under separate cover. I look forward to seeing your revsied plan. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 1 Enc 1 17/24/84 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Mobil Oil Corporation of Albany, New York, for the construction of a new 1836 square foot service station, and lot improvements located at the corner of Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Proposed Plot Plan, Kennedy Drive and Route 116," and prepared by Mobil Oil, Fairfax, Virginia, dated April 12, 1984 with the following stipulations: 1. That a revised plan be submitted for the Planner's approval prior to permit showing the following items: a. All access drives shall be 36 feet in width. b. Six parking spaces at the Northeastern end of the lot shall be shown. C. The two driveways on Kennedy Drive shalbe consolidated into one single 36' wide drive. d. The traffic island on Kennedy Drive shall be shown.. .'at the required 15 foot strip of landscaping along Kennedy ve shall be installed and shown on the revised plan. r That a performance bond for landscaping in the amount of $3000 be posted prior to permit. ('1^ C'�;'"�� -4. That a sidewalk shall be installed on Hinesburg Road the dis- tance of the property frontage, and a performance bond shall be posted prior to permit in an amount determined by the City Engineer. 5. That this approval expires in 6 months. No Text Memorandum July 24, 1984 agenda items July 18, 1984 Page 3 Pedestrian and Vehicular Access: The existing curb cut will remain in its present location. A twelve foot drive will be built to the rear of the building and a new parking area. Circulation and Parking: Parking aisles are proposed at 20 feet. Eight places are proposed. Landscaping and Screening: Additional landscaping will be placed at the rear of the parking lot. The front lot is sufficiently landscaped. Other: Chief Goddette has reviewed this plan and finds no problems. 7) Mobil Oil Corporation, Hinesburq Road and Kennedy Drive The Commission heard a preliminary discussion of this plan during its last meeting. The applicant proposed to construct a new 1836 square foot structure, and renovate the lot including consolidating the two curb cuts on Hinesburg Road into one centrally located driveway. The issues are as follows: Pedestrian and Vehicular Access: The two curb cuts on Hinesburg Road are consolidated into one more centrally located driveway. This should be 36 feet wide. The State has agreed to this width. The two curb cuts on Kennedy Drive will remain but will be aligned to be more perpendicular to the street. Both curb cuts closest to the intersection have been reviewed by Dick Ward, Zoning Administrator. It is his opinion that these are improvements that benefit the site and do not require a 250 foot distance from the intersection as stated in Section 19.103e. (See memo) The changes made to the eastern most Kennedy Drive curb cut do appear to infringe on the traffic island. The western side of the island is approximately 13.5 feet from the present driveway. The 9 foot UncC"CO"� r•e4u,e -iron will bring existing vehicles in direct line with the island. This is hazardous on Kennedy Drive, although it may be more direct for cars entering the lot to line up to pumps. I recommend a single, centrally located curb cut, or no reduction to this side of the drive. All driveways should not exceed 36 feet in width. Circulation: The Commission discussed on -site traffic movement at the last meeting. The new pumps change the direction of traffic flow on the lot from what it is presently. Parking: Parking spaces are proposed as required. Landscaping and Screening: The applicant has proposed a sufficient landscaping value; however, there must be a continuous 15' strip of landscaped area in the front yard on Kennedy Drive, traversed only %riveways. The strip between the sidewalk line and the balance of the lot is proposed at nine feet, rather than 15 feet. Memorandum July 24, 1984 July 18, 1984 Page 4 agenda items Other: Chief Goddette has approved this plan for fire access. The State has asked if a single sidewalk will be provided across the property frontage on Hinesburg Road. These seem desirable since we have required sidewalks south of the intersection on Hinesburg Road. The green strip that is steep would have to be cut. 8) Air Northern/Northern Airways Major issues have been resolved however,the plans will not be ready until the Commission's next meeting on August 14, 1984. 9) Boccia, 700 Spear Street The applicant received Zoning Board approval for the conversion of a 1398 square foot single-family residence into a medical clinic with the following stipulations: That it be used by a single physician, that parking be limited to 5 spaces and that no changes be made to the existing structure except for a possible handicapped ramp. The area is zon6d R-4. Pedestrian and Vehicular Access: A ten foot wide existing circular driveway provides access to the building and parking area. Circulation and Parking: Circulation is adequate and parking space for 5 vehicles are provided. Seven parking spaces are required to meet the requirement of 1 space for each 200 square feet of building area, however, I agree with the Zoning Board that 5 are adequate for this specific use. I recommend the Planning Commission waive the other two required spaces. Landscaping: Existing landscaping is adequate. Proposed interior improvements total $2000, calling for a landscaping value of $60. Credit should be allowed for existing vegetation worth well above this figure. Other: Chief Goddette has reviewed this plan and finds it satisfactory. 10) Benchmark Construction The applicant proposes to convert the structure into 2 offices for Benchmark Construction and Lawson Office Products. The area is Zoned C-1 and these are permitted uses. Circulation, Parking and Access: The existing driveway will be en- larged to 20'. Eight parking spaces are proposed, meeting the minimum requirement. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Mobil Oil, Kennedy Drive at Hinesburg Road Date: 7/17/84 Due to the fact that Mobil Oil presently has four driveways it is the opinion of this office that the provisions within Section 19.103 sub section (e) do not apply. In past site plan review applications similar situations were considered, in most cases the Commission applied conditions of approval which relocated or closed existing driveways, all of which did not conform to Section 19.103. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer�� Re: Mobil Oil, Kennedy Drive at Hinesburg Road Date: 7/17/84 Due to the fact that Mobil Oil presently has four driveways it is the opinion of this office that the provisions within Section 19.103 sub section (e) do not apply. In past site plan review applications similar situations were considered, in most cases the Commission applied conditions of approval which relocated or closed existing driveways, all of which did not conform to Section 19.103. .0 C r� 4 l.- bvua�ti:y, tom_ - , July 20, 1984 Attorney Ronald C. Schmucker Schmucker & Perry 1480 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Ron: Enclosed is the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting of July 24, 1984. Your application is scheduled to be considered at this meeting. Also enclosed are any pertinent materials that Ihave prepared for the Planning Commission. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 10, 1984 Ms. Bechtel noted that the widest a single curb cut could be was 361. ;Or. Findlay said they had pilots coming in and out on their shifts and that they ran a day and night shift, so there were always cars coming and going. The Commission cannot waive the curb cut width. The Zoning Board would have to give approval. Mrs. Maher felt the Planner and Engineer should look at the plan again, especially the width of the drive. Ms. Becthel said she and the Engineer had looked at the lot and that he had felt the existing curb cut should be closed. Mr. Poger noted that the Fire Chief had said there was not enough water for fire protection. He wanted to know the flow rate in the area for the next meeting. Mr. Poger mentioned eliminating some parking spaces for easier traffic flow around the corner of the building if the existing curb cut were closed. Mr. Burgess wanted more information from the Fire Chief on the adequacy of the water supply in the area, and Mr. Poger noted that if there were not enough water to protect the building, he would not recommend that approval be granted. Mrs. Plaher suggested that some pine trees be added for landscaping. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the site plan application of Northern Airways until July 24, 1984, 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mr. Belter seconded the motion and all voted aye. Consider request by Green Mountain Masonic Center(formerly Ancient Acce t Scottish Rite Temple for extension of site plan approval granted 6 19 84 from 6 months to 15 months Mr. Hugh Marvin told the Commission that they were in the process of arranging a financial campaign in the membership and that they would not have funding until the and of December. They do not expect to begin construction until next summer. He asked that the approval be good for 15 months so they could get organized. Mr. Poger noted that a synagogue at the corner of Dorset Street had recently made the same request and been granted an extension. Ms. Bechtel warned Mr. Marvin that although the plan had sewer capacity from the city, the State did not have to honor that and when this plan went before the State, it was possible they would say there was not enough capacity. Mr. Dooley moved that the site -plan approval for the Green Mountain Masonic Center be extended from 6 months as originally granted, to 15 months, and that all the stipulations on the original approval still exist. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion and all voted for it. Other business Mr. Poger noted that plans had been submitted for the conversion of the Mobile station at the corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road, but there was a slip-up on the agenda. Since the application had not been warned, no action could be taken tonight, but the applicant wanted to make a presentation tonight. The item will be on the next agenda also. Mr. Schmucker represented Mobile and Mr. Lareau, who operates the station. He said that the present building would be removed and replaced with a new one, in an altered location. The new building will have 2 bays instead of 3. The existing two curb cuts on Hinesburg Road will be made into one more central one. Both Kennedy Drive cuts will remain, but will be moved slightly. There will be only one pumping facility, with a canopy, but it will allow 6 vehicles to be gassed at one time. Green space on the site will be increased. Mr. Schmucker said he had met with representatives of the condominium association adjacent to this lot, and they had requested more plantings between the two uses. Those will be added. 4. PLANNING CUMMISSION JULY 10, 1984 Mr. Schmucker said there would be a 400 sq. ft. space for the sale of dairy products, bread, candy, cigarettes, soda, snacks, etc. No liquor will be sold and the hours will be from 6am-lopm. Mr. Poger said the paZking areas should be designated on the plan. Mr. Burgess noted that he was not sure the type of signs shown in the brochure were legal in the city and he asked that that be checked. Mr. Perkowski of mobile said that no additional drainage will come out onto Kennedy Drive beyond what is there now. There will be a drop -inlet on the Hinesburg Road side which will take 90yb of the drainage, and the rest will go into a swale existing on Hinesburg Road now. Ms. Bechtel noted that the curb cuts could be a maximum of 36' wide for a single and 30' for a double. for. Schmucker said the :Mate had approved 40' and that any narrower would be hazardous for gasoline trucks. Mr. Poger noted that the plan would have to go to the Zoning Board. Mr. Dooley said the ordinance required curb cuts to be more than 200' from a signallized intersection. The new Hinesburg Road cut will be 100'-120', but since two cuts are being combined, that will be a positive step for the city. The Kennedy Drive cut is about 150' from the intersection. Mr. Poger felt that would have to go to the Zoning Board. He asked about the island in Kennedy Drive and whether it extended into the area of the curb cut on that road. He was told it did by perhaps 51. He said he would like the first Kennedy curb cut to be an entrance only .and the other to be both. Mr. Lareau felt it would be better to have exiting allowed in both cuts. Ms. Bechtel noted that this was in traffic overlay zone 1, but Mr. Poger said that unless the traffic was being increased, if the building size was decreased, they could accept it. Mr. Tower went over the proposed landscaping. There will be Norway maples on the Hinesburg Road side and low plantings on the other sites on the lot. Mr. Dooley asked that the island in Kennedy Drive be shown on the plan. Mr. Poger said he"did not like the trend of convenience stores being added to gas stations. Caron Body Shop - Ms. Bechtel said the Commission had been sent a memo from the Zoning Administrator on this issue. Mr. Poger said he was dismayed that the Administrator had granted approval without checking the ordinance. He felt it had been sloppy and was concerned that the ordinance was being undermined. Ms. Bechtel said the next meeting would have zoning amendments for discussion. The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 pm. Clerk STATE OF VERA-10":T AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street. Administranc,r Building Niontpeher, Vermont 05602 SPORT P June 22, 1984 Ronald C. Schmucker. Esq. Perry « Schmucker P. 0. Box 2323 South Burlington, Vermont 05402 RE: South Burlington, Vt. 116 L.S. 174+00 Lt. Dear Mr. Schmucker: We have received and have reviewed the permit application and the plan to change the access to Vt. 116 in conjunction with major renovations planned for the existing station. Although we agree with the proposal to eliminate one of the two existing curb cuts, we cannot agree to the remaining curb cut being constructed to a width of fifty (50) feet. Our standards allow for a maximum width of forty (40) feet. On June 7th Mr. Welch of this office met on the site with a representative from Mobil and the operator of the station. At this meeting Mr. Welch discussed using thirty (30) foot radii rather than the ten (10) foot radii, as drawn on the plan. (See attached photo -copy of the plan.) Further, he discussed lowering the grade of the access to conform with our standards. This is an effort to keep water from the station yard from runninq onto the highway. Another item discussed was the rebuilding of the existing drainage to accommodate the new access. We will issue a permit for the proposed work, but first, we must receive and approve a revised plan and we must receive a copy of the Zoning and/or Act 250 permit. If there is a landscaping plan, we should have a copy of it, also. Is the city going to require that a sidewalk be provided across the frontage of the property along Vt. 116? If so, we would like details of same. 7-. , cr, ft ,, n V Q' STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05602 'rti NSppR'CP X, July 17, 1984 Ronald C. Schmucker, Esq. Perry & Schmucker P. 0. Box 2323 South Burlington Vermont 05402 RE: South Burlington, Vt. 116 L.S. 174+00 Lt. Access to Mobil Station Dear Mr. Schmucker: Per your telephone call on July 16, we agree that you may reduce the width of the proposed access from 40 feet to 36 feet. You will note that our previous letter indicated merely a maximum width of 40 feet, but did not mandate such a width. Also mentioned was the length of the radius to be used. In our previous letter we mentioned 30 feet, which in this case would be a minimum length. Enclosed for your inforriation and use is a copy of our standard drawing B-71. Sjn'cerely, L;a1r, s H. Hoag Utl ties Engineer Enc. cc: Jane Bechtel Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street So. Burl., Vt. 05402 C- c roc � U e,\,\\ C �t�� tA*,I- -L-1 (ev-4 c e-,,�Y-4 'Or w*- rvz ?6,C �, « C,\ 1-3 Lt LC,k M�\ CNR o/ a xzoo. ..) STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05602 June 22, 1984 Ronald C. Schmucker, Esq. Perry & Schmucker P. 0. Box 2323 South Burlington, Vermont 05402 RE: South Burlington, Vt. 116 L.S. 174+00 Lt. Dear Mr. Schmucker: We have received and have reviewed the permit application and the plan to change the access to Vt. 116 in conjunction with major renovations planned for the existing station. Although we agree with the proposal to eliminate one of the two existing curb cuts, we cannot agree to the remaining curb cut being constructed to a width of fifty (50) feet. Our standards allow for a maximum width of forty (40) feet. On June 7th Mr. Welch of this office met on the site with a representative from Mobil and the operator of the station. At this meeting Mr. Welch discussed using thirty (30) foot radii rather than the ten (10) foot radii, as drawn on the plan. (See attached photo -copy of the plan.) Further, he discussed lowering the grade of the access to conform with our standards. This is an effort to keep water from the station yard from running onto the highway. Another item discussed was the rebuilding of the existing drainage to accommodate the new access. We will issue a permit for the proposed work, but first, we must receiveand approve a revised plan and we must receive a copy of the Zoning and/or Act 250 permit. If there is a landscaping plan, we should have a copy of it, also. Is the city going to require that a sidewalk be provided across the frontage of the property along Vt. 116? If so, we would like details of same. cc: Dist. Env. Coord. #4 Katherine Vose cerely, �( Ja es H. Hoag Utilities Engineer No Text 0-c's- V----------- ---------- - ktj,A Ar �ASONS GARDEN CENTERS HOME AND INDUSTRIAL LANDSCAPING July 18, 1984 Jane Bechtel City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Proposed Mobil Station Expansion Kennedy Drive - Hinesburg Road Inventory of Proposed and Existing Landscape New Plantings GARDEN CENTER AND CHRISTMAS SHOP 61 Industrial Ave., Williston, Vermont 05495 802-658-2433 12 Spirea 'Anthony Waterer' Red Spirea 21/22' 12 Spirea prunifolia Snowmound Spirea 18-24" ` 12 Potentilla 'Gold Drop' Gold Drop Potentilla 2' 9 Syringa palabiana Dwarf Korean Lilac 2' 14 Euonymous alatus compacta Dwarf Burning Bush 18-24" 9 Symphoricarpos orbiculatus Snowberry 2'-3' 1 Picea glauca conica Blue Spruce 61/8' 4 Acer platinoides Norway Maple 2-22"cal. 3 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 10'-12' restoration of onsite planting _ set aside of an additional $500.00 for low shrub screening in rear - yard to be placed as needed. Value - $4,100.00 SHT/km Sincerely, Scott H. Tower Landscape Division Manager DIVISION OF O. & S. GARDNER CORPORATION 6L ---- -- ---- �U, PL�ls< uvz�d ----------- A - rid '4 &—% U NN Ck Y I W 109- 1 ',-.)M WA,0\1 -to 6dr-lr\e-r' - - ---- ------- - --------- An ve4 ...... ..... .. . ... ----------- - --------- -- --------- July 22, 1968 Mr. Wilton M. Vandeventer District Sales Representative Shell Oil Company Lake Front Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Vandeventer: Four to six weeks ago I asked you to take care of the landscaping around the new Shell Station on Kennedy Drive. Very shortly thereafter a crew was in and they landscaped the grounds of the Shell Station. However, they did not reseed the entrances that were stripped out and put in the wrong place. This damage done to the town right-of-way between the extreme limits of the right--of-way and the paved portion of the street should be replaced at the Shell Oil Company's expense and it seems we have been patient enough since this goes back to last year. Very truly yours, Henry LeClair Town PZanager HL/h June 4, 1968 Mr. Ralph B. Kristensen Shell Oil Company 54 Riverside Avenue Rensselaer, New York 12144 Re: Gasoline Station Entrance New Filling Station at the end of section of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Rd., So. Burlington, Vt. Dear Mr. Kristensen: After considerable difficulty with the entrance to this filling station, mostly over curb cuts, we find that spring is gone, summer is here, and as yet Shell Oil Company has made no effort to replace the grass that was unnecessarily torn up during construction. What I refer to is the two entrances that were put in the wrong place originally. Only the sidewalk was replaced leaving excavations on both sides of the sidewalk with a gravel base. Both strips were about thirty feet wide and eight inches deep. I would greatly appreciate it if your people would replace the loam and seed these areas. Very truly yours, Henry LeClair Town Manager HL/h May 29, 1968 Mr. B. W. McFarland Real Estate Representative Mobil Oil Corporation 142 Albany Street Springfield, Massachusetts 01105 Dear Mr. McFarland: The Town of South Burlington issued a permit for street openings at the corner of Kennedy Drive and Williston Road which you signed as permit holder. The Contractor installing the entrances was instructed by the Town Engineer as to how the curb cuts were to be made. On May 27, 1968, upon inspection, it appeared that these instructions were not to be carried out prior to paving. The Town Engineer informed the contrac- tor once again, however, the contractor elected to proceed as he deemed adequate. I am therefore putting you on notice that unless this is corrected the Town will barricade the curb cuts and replace the granite curbing that was removed on Kennedy Drive. Very truly yours, Henry LeClair Town. Manager HL/h May 29, 1968 Mir. B. W. McFarland Real Estate Representative Mobil Oil Corporation 142 Many Street Springfield, Massachusetts 01105 Dear Mr. McFarland: The Town of South Burlington issued a permit for street openings. at the corner of Kennedy Drive and Williston Road which you signed as permit holder. The Contractor installing the entrances was instructed by the Town Engineer as to how the curb cuts were to be made. On May 27, 1958, upon inspection, it appeared that these instructions were not to be carried out prior to paving. The Town Engincer informed the contrac- tor once again, however, the contractor elected to proceed as.he deemed adequate. I am therefore putting you on notice that unless this is corrected the Town will barricade the curb cuts and replace the granite curbing that was removed on Kennedy Drive. Very truly yours, Henry LeClair Town. Manager HL/h DE VE cc e.,, re. ,,, i re re arm pe gr b 1 a SG up general outside terms there of the town larch 28, 1969 more the as been have not r the ra to e. hem to ail. I ase ce the L)een ilex and are told 11 put In seems to be a design to stay completely ordinance. Enclosed please find copies of correspondence dated August 29, 1967 and May 29, June 4, and July 22, 1968, regard- ing restoration of damage to public property. I ara reluctant to turn this matter over to the Town Attorliey due to the legal expense involved. Page 2 Mr. AIL,iert I. Reynolds March 28, 1969 Since Shell is back again for more except x town ordinance I ask you to keep in mind except their next appeal that their disregard of town and property imposes a. very difficult urden o administrator and that so far they u concise language. I therefore as"' any var the future contain the provis i at y rest I street to its original. condit !'� . yours, lair qer E.ncl: ns to the onsidering rdinances the zoning 11 - clear, aV-I9,C e s in SHELL OIL COMPANY j4 Riverside Avenue Renssolacr., 1Jew York Town !,Tayi2ger Town of South Durlin-tom, Vermont Dear Sir: 1211t4 August 29., 1967 Application is hereby made for a variance in location of the easterly entrance to our nev service station on Kennedy Drive., and to shorten the 208 ft. median island to 195 ft. It is proposed to relocate the most easterly entrance off Kennedy Drive 10 1 -411 to the West. It is also proposed to remove a 13 1 -0" ss ccition from the most westerly end of the median island. An attached plot plan shows what we are requesting more pictorally. The proposed reconstruction to be done at our expense and to your specification. It is requested that the Zoning Board of Appeals, at their next meeting, revicw this application and that -,.ie be notified of the time and place of this meeting so our representative can attend to explain fully our position. Tha projAct is conplete except for blacktoPP -.,iing; however c can go no farther until thc antranco problem is resolved. Very- + r-aely Ralph B. Kristensen, District Digineer Shell Oil Cczapany ARA• f7f Wara11. 500• • wt--A wL1qWT. 650• t! ay A—Pmppw . t JOv R•. 5a TT. W, ro Lao oW nq AttAs. lot • . Ov Yovu.AI- 60 00. P.5. 1. OLTw.TL JTtL%T, rIIG- Js,000 Y,aae .,g000 lAj�wla SYaY.s Staau•Plw 6"ooO AUuev Dear+ ! 55.000 • Y.tLp Jon Doe. • \6 t. STatUpTt Ceo mTt le tOA 1.-FKT.cs or U-R -L4 OuYrta., N-4 -1.4 W O,IwTL To.ax*iwJ•L40. WcLTJL°•.1G. y1uU to• �q1Y 0AT— Oa•rGU '0.2,5— L,A-1- PA—, A" a T*.—.•.Y/Yay.J: YI 15 AT •41 MLOW rtAot COX 2.0')Al Yt i. o.4 4 F-1— CI C a 24 ) ,.. ua o.acrwe PP•Tt,aeWC P•.•+uu.Wa (TAUt(M•,m) wL. WL14.1 Or EaaTa . 1wo Vt, •FT. t Twt•{+i•.'h/) Fet Wo7,T 5.14 •1.1! D , D—IX � r .y � Qi �H• Swuwj �oJ d {iotltoUtAt • O.nan<.A JG AT.NWia CouurcPou�Te P.,, K..va _ Q »a0 A11 AL W— TaaT 0r io 441L r'T N—LJ. vT LA.oa.T,aT. Conan CAa r'. Tyaa,•Yao OJ 24Q-L T. ?�MT,m 5K4 141 M—TT CLr101 P—T rav W Hd.IL W'uo• 5e TY.T •S•4J W— FuTYaa ivi• W— AT T,.• Nk,*c T'r. qoW Tavry Aoe CAaca,AT eu+ 1,• 'U..W A, 3-1 Kr. ,. OL ao•/•' T+L AD.++ tSAsaTT. DcaicJ Or T'b,.c Dri a<0j TDa40,W. t1.waWTtrM•4 Y,tp.'• taw .u♦ 7TLa ++-S41r_sov at1. /1.L • 3r.r.ea1 Yawl• f 1'Li� rAGm• ov braTT—,'5�8-- . 1.5b AYc•e6 � a1+�1-1�2'0 �5.aT+.4=O'�OYG� F'oTLt flan Taval•J Siaaas 1• AT Q•eT D4 TtY OtT caAd• Vrrlaa SYua _ _ :Ye f!•r• T%Tt.N Na I{A,wrY AT Cp6 bai -- - -- r.• s<W.e.L. oe G� 5 SUrrat• Aaa& • 17• L 1< Y.—OT • 54q W0•v(AT GT—'A-A) • 1+f,tIWY TtUslou [eau � frul kcal-�,y�'a•-. tt-6aa• DTaaa+. Fevia • 9ltee _ , v � ►.a.l. r.:.• 0, 5A.—I • Li P..c 4r s r Tv �tTo• Or 3Artr} . ayt �aa Dcayg 5-11.0 Or 544001'4 '—AT" Or OTAa41a N4 Me.n u!s "A" QI D..uW..to Fovea• Ceu<wTt 'se • TirTAL • 4Jcacja.tla• No M•VT . 24,40oA 5 • 75.1oe •• F..tea o. !w—;Iy 1:t at•c liuG PAb AIa 4a+,. ,+.�aa C2. i i1 d4 4 L1W.V.L11L YapUa * Or Q, 47.4 r'cT.a Or S.ILTr Or 1.5 - 1.5 . 56"'a - -- e[�4,r 14-46 • AcToAL VAava or Yt • i x V1 PPP r 6 +yt Y D* A 1.22 t 15 r 10oe• D— CnTLL 71 YI Wa.a UacaacjaO Aw Pb1YT Or ftoTAT1aJ ahaa Twcw AaovT TSwat_ Or FL.--p a. D,.tjO•mlp Mo+avt• . 51,50er• , .5T1a1L%%taq Me.,a • (74,4Oe+'S )-(SOW r 1.67)• (73200 A26,,60o)• lR 000'• _ TA Tea Or 5wcr_Ty • 9 bee T-l1� rsY• !yt'OM.r s'-e•Le 14 T•ualaa 51awc111 �- b—Ts raava♦Tto 4'A•o,a G`.OGtaTal I A T.tr VO .. Te t.,J z..aao , na.T�.++u C.—J. Ave —, `%ATa T. F" W T C"A-W a C OSA1W On / O RIM 115IJeT Form botte,4 rc{1oJ Ov base r j b • s e e•wc I — 4•Awr. C. ta•.ucY cs. na �• o•va O VCt a'a__TJ r.•a Vowa6 • 5.5 C..yDt. MIJ. Wa•Gvt• 22, 15ov 1A MA.O* 5T.—T �I Y . 15T•_t 1T IOTaa3tGj,Ot) AT Ivma C211. G4-cowuLUOLD genmq- lIOU Pl..z Tw5 C,;. K 15 FoQ S�¢u1T AUO T-11 loW P'uaroxs STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT HIGHWAY ENGINEER ESSEX JUNCTION 05452 September 13, 1967 Henry N. LeClair, Manager Town of South Burlington 555 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. LeClair: Attachgd hereto is a memo received today from our traffic section, approving the reduction on length of the traffic island on Kennedy Drive at its intersection with Vt. Rte. 116, as requested by the Shell Oil Company. I am enclosing herewith a sketch of subject island, showing a modification which we will require if the Town of South Burlington grants Shell Oil Company the permit to reduce the present length. All work necessary to complete the proposed reduction in length of this island is to be done under the State of Vermont Department of High- ways Standard bpecifications for Highway and Bridge Construction, dated April 1964, and in accordance with the typical section as shown on Sheet 2 of 64 of Project U 528-2 (2). Very truly yours, Chester F. Laythe District Engineer CFL: cev+ Eric!. (3) HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: C. F. Laythe, District Engineer /✓/ FROM: C. F. Knapp, Assistant Traffic Engineer DATE: September 7, 1967 SUBJECT: South Burlington, U 528-2(2) This morning we looked at a plan presented by the representatives of the Shell Oil Company which necessitated the removal of 25 feet of our present divisional island west of Route 116. The traffic division can see no reason why this 25-foot cut should not be allowed. The department has also received a verbal approval from the Bureau of Public Roads that they would also not object to such a cut. Therefore, there is no reason why you should not give the necessary permit for the change in the end of this island. CFK:jb cc: E. H. Stickney G . r1. Lane HD-296 20M 4-67 26 5' 20.0, 20.5, 2 LO' 21.5' 21.3 7-- ? 2.5, 4�) 25.5 26.5 14.0 c- 23.5 23 5* 23 0' VT ROUTE 116 INTERSECT ION SCALE 1 INCH -- 20 FEET m 225 22 5' 60, 80 80 -40 6.0, 6.5' 6'5, 7)0' 1 230 22-5' L ?-.5 225 1s/017<71 /17 • x ,A WAXIMI.# 9Aof . SEC- l(N 51 5W Sh l / +AUM 8 0 MINIMUM VARIABLE 8-0 MINIMUM L31TUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT GRANITE .SLftPf EDGING, TEM 556-A !, ITEM 556-8 (MOa1FIED),ITEM 361-8 COMMERCIAL FERTIVZER FOR GRASS S,ITE%t 615 R A r3' PENETRATION MACADAM I. TC,"SOIL 'TEM 624 CRUS44ED STONE BASE COURSE GRAD I 1 ITEM 215 1 3E[DIkol AWNS) ITEM 61 DEL, ITEM 201-A 8t_ott DE CROWN 3 aARAQOLIC + PAIR AS" L i C 6" — --- STRAIGHT S i4" 1N 2 _ q7 NORMAL SECTION WITH DIVISIONAL ISLAND 'G tiiSCc% Is/On 41-0" +21-0 !,/%S�I'/�� wit FACE OF ; GUARD RAIL I I f \ December 23, 1966 Mr. Ralph B. Kristensen Shell Oil Company 54 ;riverside Avenue Rensselaer, New York 12144 Dear Mr. Kristensen: There appears to be some misunderstanding as to what is to bo built on t1he corner of Kennedy drive and Hine sbur6 Road ir South Burlington. The permit that was issued and renewed is considerably different from the plot plan you sent are with the check for a v ar'. ance on the sign, and since the sign is minor with respect to the overall building permit, I am asking for further advice from you at this time whether or not you want to proceed with the Zoning Ordinance request. Enclosed please find copy of the original permit. To cite a few of the diffuZajties, the original request was for a "nerd concept" of the filling station, slowing other services pro- vided besides gas, oil, maintenance, lubrication, etc. The original buil'ing ;permit was for a lot of land comprising 44,000 sq. ft. i`,e Zoning Ordinance calls for 40,000 sq. ft., and the new request appears to be approximately 22,000 sq. ft. The building structure ought to be set back 501 from the street line and I find this (the pumps, at least) to be approximately 201. Another matter is in respect to the curb cuts. As you can see, there were only 2 curb cuts originally planned. This shows 4, one of which is directly in front of the island, and I suspect that the state may indicate some concern over this. Mr. Ralph B. Kristensen ;hell Oil Compariy -2- December 23, 1966 Since this is not what the permit consisted of originally and if this is the final solution, T must point out that there would many other variances necessary before the plot plan you show can be constructed, and these may as well be included in the original request. Very truly yours, Henry LeClair Town Manager HL/h Eno1. 1 cc: G. Dana Alling I � TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PERMITNo............................................................. Permissionis hereby granted to ...................................................... ............. :................................... .1..,//.................. ....... .... :...,,,.......................... to perform the work described as follows, on the street known as ....................../ hd.�. ��......;...y/ i-l...<t. ................ in the Town of South Burlington. A�moore specific location of this work being..................�..rR.,� ...................��r: ......... 1/ ..••..�'".:............0 �C?./:�12.Y.........Q.. i....................... ,L v� ` -......... r r2.1?r.�.r1... ...il .. f ............. . r .i..... .................,�/!f ... �.�..�::.a...e.. (°r...L....� °:...?................. This permit is issued with the following directions, restrictions and conditions, and covers only the work described hereinafter, and then only when the work described is performed as /directed. Description of the work to be performed ....................... .Q................L ..L>..!t .1`............ .......... G7...fin........................... ........................... .. t/d.. 4-1d.... .................... ...................... . ............. ...A'................. ..... 'i ............................�............. ...,.......o..... ./......................... ...-....-.g................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Directions for performing such work ................... . ......................... >.. ...........}'�...+!1.....1.. ........... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ This permit shall be void unless the work herein contemplated shall have been completed before......:'..: �..� :.......:................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ The undersigned, in consideration of the issuing of this permit, having duly read all of the contents herein, expressly agrees to the above directions and to the restrictions and conditions printed on the reverse side of this sheet. //�✓;.j yr�l .c ,are f/fvG��C/�C G' . Signed....(...../.... /................................................ ............... Pe .. rmit Holder Witness: ......................................................................................................................................................Address................................................................................................................................. Town Manager Datedat ............. ............. ,................... ................................................................................................................................ This ................ ..............day of..................�r•-«n..................... Iq..��....,% SEE OTHER SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS IM SETS 5-57 QCP RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS Relating to Laying of Pipes, Conduits, Eta. After any pipes, conduits, drains or other underground structures are laid, or any excavation is made in the roadway, the trenches or openings shall be properly back -filled with suitable material; the back -fill shall be thoroughly tamped, and the surface of the road over said structures shall be left even with the adjoining ground. If the work is done in cold weather no frozen mate- rial shall be used for back -filling. Whenever the hardened surface of the roadway, gutters or any part of the surface of the highway is disturbed it shall be replaced in as good condition as before it was disturbed, and if new materials are required they shall correspond with those already in place on the road. Where service pipes are to cross the highway the connections shall be made without disturbing the hardened surface of the roadway, by driving the pipes under the roadway, or the service pipes shall be carried under and across the road in a larger pipe, unless otherwise ordered by the Manager. The party or parties to whom the permit is granted shall maintain the surface of the roadway over said structures as long as the Town may deem necessary, until all signs of the trenches have been eliminated. General Conditions During the progress of the work all structures under ground and above ground shall be properly protected from damage or injury; such barrier shall be erected and maintained as may be necessary for the protection of the traveling public; the same shall be properly lighted at night; and the party or parties to whom this permit is issued shall be responsible for all damages to person or property due to or resulting from any work done under this permit. Except as herein authorized, no excavation shall be made or obstacle placed within the limits of the Town Street in such a manner as to interfere unnecessarily with the travel over said street. If any grading work done under this permit interferes with the drainage of the Town Street or Highway in any way, such catch basins and outlets shall be constructed as may be necessary, in the opinion of the Manager, to take proper care of said drainage. Wherever the hardened surface of the roadway is disturbed and the Manager may consider it necessary or advisable to do so, said surface will be restored by the employees of the Town, at such time as the Town may direct, and the expense thereof shall be borne by the party or parties to whom the permit is issued, who shall purchase and deliver on the road the materials necessary for said work, as directed by the Manager. All payments to engineers, laborers, inspectors, etc., employed by the Town for or on account of the work herein contemplated shall be made by said party or parties forthwith on the receipt of written orders, payrolls, or vouchers approved by the Town. If the party or parties to whom this permit is issued does any work contrary to the orders of the Manager and, after due notice, fails to correct such work or to remove such structure or material as he or they may be ordered to remove the Town may, with or without notice, correct such work or remove such structure or material; and the party or parties to whom this permit is issued shall reimburse the Town for any expense incurred in correcting the work or removing the structure or material. All of the work herein contemplated shall be done under the supervision and to the satisfaction of the Town of South Burlington, and the entire expense thereof shall be borne by the party or parties to whom this permit is issued. On the completion of the work herein contemplated all rubbish and debris shall be removed and the roadway and roadsides shall be left neat and presentable and satisfactory to the Manager. The Town hereby reserves the right to order the change of location or the removal of any structure or structures authorized by this permit at any time said change or removal to be made by and at the expense of the party or parties to whom this permit is granted, or their successors or assigns. This permit may be modified or revoked at any time by the Town without rendering said Town of South Burlington liable in any way. The party or parties to whom this permit is issued shall pay the salary, subsistence and traveling expenses of any inspector or engineer appointed by the Town to supervise the work herein contemplated. All of the above conditions shall be applicable to the work herein authorized, unless the same are inconsistent with the condi- tions on the face of the permit, in which case the conditions written or printed on the face of the permit shall apply. The acceptance of this permit or the doing of any work thereunder shall constitute an agreement by the party or parties to whom the permit is granted to comply with all of the conditions and restrictions printed or written herein. June 4, 1963 ;•ir. Ralph B. Kristensen Shell nil Company 54 Riverside Avenue Rensselaer, New York 12144 Re: Gasoline Station Entrance New Filling Station at the end of section of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Rd., So. Burlington, Vt. Dear '?r. Kristensen: After considerable difficulty with the entrance to this filling station, mostly over curb cuts, we find that spring is gone, summer is here, and as yet Shell Oil Company has made no effort to replace the grass that was unnecessarily torn up during construction. What I refer to is the two entrances that were put in the wrong place originally. Only the sidewalk was replaced leaving excavations on both sides of the sidewalk with a gravel base. coth strips were about thirty feet %-tide and eight inches deep. I would greatly appreciate it if your people would replace the loam and seed these areas. Very truly yours, henry LeClair Town Manager I JL/h August 30, 1967 Mr. Ralph B. Kristensen, District Engineer Shell Oil Company 54 Riverside Avenue Rensselaer, New York, 12144 Dear Mr. Kristensen: This is to notify you that the u Burlingt6�)Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold A26!, hearing at the Town Office Building, 555 Do tt, South Burlington, Vermont on Wednesday, Septter 7 at 7:30P.M.to consider your request f ve. Please plan to attend the meetUg". Very truly yours, Henry LeClair Town Manager HL/h STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT gt. on ......... Vt. 05403 19 - To the Department of Highways, Montpelier, Vermont. Gentlemen: The undersigned makes application for permissi( ..Out, �. a ... 35....ourb ..out...near ...h.is......ast.ern .. b..ound y ..114! ... Qn.t he ...i side of �'ennedy Drive In South burl ingt on,,...V.t Curb Cut sided ................. .... -- I . Drive ............ I .. .... ................ ...... ......... ..... .Cut, I was installed In 196.5 e. ............... .................... ..... + 1 4 4 4-1. 11 .�77cjug-'C' r.;t. V 09 0 -.� Q � .. I A �- V I 1Z.- 4 4 ... 4� A! ... V1 0-4�aA I a Us . — ... I ..... ..... .... I ................... ................................. ..................... I ...... .... ....... oil "X -- + .. - - - - - - - + - - - - .... in the Town of ... '---outh ... zurllret.011. ........................... the location of this work being Ah.o.rr.... on attached Ark!k ...... lh,� ... 14na ... b4.s. t!ee.n ... confirmd-As I . .... .. ........... I... I I I ..... I Commercial F by the Selectmen; and a building pf.,rmit has seer ............ ... ...................................... I .......... .......................................... !1.................... ... .... I ......... granted to corstruct a p°asollnp service station on the premises. ..................... I .......... ...... I ........ I ....................... ................... I ...... Permit to extend from ... oril.1. ................ 19..�7. to .... 4ertej,,i'Rr 19..6.7. -1 .... .112, - Signed... 0... 6X. -.1 ............... .............. . ..... The.. ALLING ... Campany .... .......... . ..................... . Address .....S. ....Bu.ri.ing.t.on,..V.e.r.m.ont..05.40.3 .................... I ..................... . .... . I .... ..... .. . . .. ..... .... .... .. Show sketch of proposed work: ................................................................................ North West South East I HD 211 2M-"5 STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT To the Department of Highways, Montpelier, Vermont. Gentlemen: S.o. Lurlington....... Vt. 04035 .D.ecember... 5. ..... 196.6., 19 The undersigned makes application for permission to cut a 351 curb cut near his eastern boundry..line...on the... QI prth) side of Kennedy Drive in South Burlington.....Vt,.._ Curb ... Cut .#... " A" was installed in .1965.. (. with your permsssion) , .hi.s,..one..... . is requested to assist in the orde.rly..fl.ow, of traffic. ................ .... in the Town of SPuth_.B, urli,ng,ton..........................., the location of this work being shown on attached ,plot ,.plan....... he land,. has...been., been.— fix irmed .a s Commercial B by the Selectmen; and a building permit has been ............. ............... .............................. .......... .......... ...................................................... ...........I............. granted, to construct a gasoline service station on the premises. _... ......... _ __...._ ..... _ ...........................................I ..... ._.......I......... Permit to extend from April , 19.6.7.. to ... September ... 1....... 19.67.. Signed............ :.......................... '............................ 1'h.o... Al.LING... Com.pa+�.... ................................ S. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Address..................................................................................................... Show sketch of proposed work: . a t.ta the d......................................... North West South HD 211 2M-6-65 h fl STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT HIGHWAY ENGINEER ESSEX JUNCTION 05452 July 22, 1970 Robert M. Janes, Town Manager Town of South Burlington 555 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Janes: In reference to your letter of June 19, 1970, regarding the action of the Selectmen of South Burlington in approving the request of the San Remo Corporation for two (2) curb cuts on Kennedy Drive, and requesting approval by this Department and the Bureau of Public Roads based on a safety review. The curb cuts which the San Remo Corporation requested in February, 1970, and those approved by the South Burlington Board of Selectmen on June 15, 1970, are in the same or similar location, and approval for the original curb cuts was received from the Bureau of Public Roads on March 17, 1970. It is the contention of this Department that the curb cuts will serve only the traffic traveling westerly on Kennedy Drive, and there- fore the drives will not constitute a traffic hazard. Any request for approval to cut or remove any portion of the exist- ing divisional island will be denied. If the permit for the subject curb cuts has not been issued, I would suggest then when it is issued that it include a statement to the effect that the permit can be revoked if, in the judgment of the Select- men of South Burlington, the drive locations are constituting a definite traffic hazard. Very truly yours Chester F. Laythe District Engineer CFL:cem cc: C. F. Knapp, Traffic Engineer G. W. Ayers, Utilities Engineer Page 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 9, 1969 A and support for a feasibility study of South Burlington's establishing its own electric light department, but since the discourse consisted of opinions only,'unsupported by factual evidence, it has not been included in these minutes. ' In answer to a question, Mr. Fayette said there is no enabling legislation to study a county system. Mr. Sinclair ended the discussion by complimenting the Planning Commission for calling this "enlightening meeting." Adjournment was at 10 p.m. and meeting reconvened at 10:15 p.m. SAN REMO REALTY CORPORATION Representative presented revised plan; it was studied and discussed along with recom- mendations of town engineer and of town manager, which are attached to these minutes. Mr. LeClair stated the original plan was for three lots and now there are four; sug- gested one of the buildings be deleted and instructed plan have three lots delineated. Mr. Chittenden moved plan be accepted after all recommended changes in attached docu ments are made, one property line is deleted and lots designated as 1, 2 and 3. Mr. Ravlin seconded the motion and there was unanimous approval. REGIONAL HEALTH OFFICER Mr. Behney suggested holding a discussion with the Board of Selectmen regarding hiring a sanitary engineer. No motion needed. CONSOLIDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION AND ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. Mr. Reynolds asked for reasons for including this item on agenda. Mr. Sargent read from the Vermont Planning Development Act that Planning and Zoning boards could be one and the same, citing his belief this would lend itself to good enforcement. He said the law permits up to nine members on such a joint board. Discussion followed re whether such a move would be feasible for a town the size of South Burlington. Mr. Sargent feels requests for variances would diminish in number. Mr. Behney feels the Board of Adjustment has been working under handicap without an updated master plan to be fully informed on future plans; this would also, he feels, lead to better understand- ing between boards. Consolidation appeared unpopular, rather many expressed the feel- ing more meetings between town boards would improve the present lack of understanding. i PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Page 2 December 9, 1969 Mr. Lamphere made a motion to recommend to the Board of Selectmen that no building permits be issued for the area south of #65-66 Central Avenue, Queen City Park, be- cause of unstable soil conditions and pollution. Mr. Tudhope seconded the motion and it was voted unanimously. Mr. Szymanski indicated this question would be given further consideration after the report by Webster & Martin arrives. It was decided to place this as item #1 on the agenda for the meeting to be held December 23. SAN REMO DRIVE AND ALL STREETS IN FIRESIDE PARK Mr. LeClair reviewed background of question. Mr. Szymanski indicated the problems were minor and would be taken care of by the paving he recommended in his December 9 memorandum to the Planning Commission re this question (a copy of which is attached to these minutes), which he indicated have been agreed to by the developer. Mr. Lamphere moved the acceptance of San Remo Drive and all streets of Fireside Park. Mr. Allard seconded and it was so moved by unanimous vote. AMENDED-Pl"-OFKENNEDY PLAZA ' Mr. LeClair showed the plan, which was ap proved pproved in September, with its changes. He explained Mr. Pizzagalli wants two curb breaks on Kennedy Drive and two more on Hines- burg Road. Traffic problems and possible installation of a traffic light at the Ken- nedy Drive and Hinesburg Road intersection were discussed. Mr. Allard said he thought all plans to be discussed at Planning Commission meetings should be submitted in time for the town engineer to have the opportunity to study them and have recommendations ready for the meeting to prevent wasted time. Mr. Sargent asked if this plan conforms with the one accepted on February 4, 1969. It was decided it does not. Mr. Sargent favored rejecting it on this basis. Mr. 1 Lamphere moved for acceptance, Mr. Tudhope seconded the motion and there were 2 ayes and one no vote. The plan was approved. SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 24, 19703. UNIVERSITY MALL SHOPPING CENTER, DOR-SET STREETS CONTINUED 5. Addition of an exit from north of Zayre's store. 6. Outline of what would be done with undeveloped parts. Mr. Terry Boyle said there should be consideration of a buffer zone between the center and Howard Johnson's, with consideration given to pedestrian causeway. It was decided there should be included in the plan architecture and masonry. Mr. Allard made the motion to table the plan until the April 14 meeting. Mr. Ignaszewski seconded the motion, there was no discussion and the motion passed unanimously. DORSET HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT Mr. Ward said this plan had passed its first reading. Mr. Lamphere suggested it be passed on to the advisory committee for its opinion. C NNEDY DRIVE SERVICE STATION Ward stated this plan was completely different from the one on e. Reference was made to the minutes of December 2, 1969 meeting ch showed allowed curb cuts and Mr. Lamphere requested Mr. Pizzagalli bring in the new plan. Mr. Pizzagalli agreed. ----- - _ _ SHELBURNE ROAD AND PINE STREET EXTENSION Mr. Lamphere showed the highway department's plan and explained this was for information only. Mr. Behney said the fifth lane would be built soon from Swift Street to Imperial Drive. MAMMOTH MART LANDSCAPING Mr. Lamphere stated the accepted plan had not been carried out and suggested calling in officials to discuss the matter. Mr. Allard said SOUTH BURLINGTON LEGAL NOTICE SUBDIWSiON' HEARING The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at Cafeteria No. 2 in the High School, Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, August 26, 1969, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: August 26, 1909 Appeal of San Remo Realty Corporation for approval of a proposed subdivision development of a parcel of land Tlocated on the northeast side of the intersection of Kennedy 'leld a regular meeting at South Drive and Hinesburg Road. The appeal is for permission to construct office buildings and a service station all of Colonial $i design, as per plans on file in the Town Manager's office. `street, South Burlington, Vermont f Frederic O. Sargent, Chairman o; i 1 South Burlington Planning Commission called the meeting to order at 7:35 P. M. MCMBTERS PRESENT Frederic 0. Sargent, Chairman; Joseph L. Allard; Royal Chittenden; James A. Lamphere and Lester Ravelin. Ex—officio Harry Behney. OTHERS PRESENT Town Engineer Szymanski, Angelo Pizzagalli, Homer DuBois, Robert J. Furlong, David Furlong, Mrs. Jean Iiildick, representative of South Burlington League of Women Voters 1"Inutes of Meeting of Auast' 12, 1909 Mr. Ravelin referred to Page 2, Item 5 and said he did not recall agreeing that curbs were not nacess.ry because of natural drainage. On motion made by Mr. Ravelin, seconded by Mr. T,amuhere, Ttem 5 should now read- Curbs be tsrovided unless the Town Engineer agrees that drainage is sufficient. Motion wns n^ssed unanimously. Another correction made to minutes that Town Fngineer Szymanski was not present. T,akelands Corporation nneal._ Since no one from this corporation had as yet apueared, it was passed over to the next item on the agenda. Piz,—zza�,-alli Subdivision Ifearir> Mr. Angelo Pizzagalli presented his subdivision plan, explaining that because this land has a gulley it would not be feasible to use it for apartments. He would endeavor to conform the new subdivision to those in existence with attractive Colonial design. He would also plant twenty feet of trees between the service station and the rest of the develorment. 1. Has the town been arbitrary? 2. Can a decision made by the Zoning Administrator be appealed to the Zoning Board of Adjustment? OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 7 r1' M STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MONTPELIER 05602 April 17, 1970 Mr. R. F. Janes Town Manager Town of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Janes: On February 20, 1970, the Department issued a, permit to the San Remo Realty Corporation covering drive entrances into property on the northeast corner of the Hinesburg Road -Kennedy Drive intersection. In accordance with the State Statute and as stated on the permit form, the Department's authority only covers those highways which are on the State Highway System. Therefore, the Department is revoking the permit which was issued to the San Remo Realty Corporation on February 20, 1970 and is issuing a new permit covering only the drive into Hinesburg Road. As to the permit for curb openings from Kennedy Drive to the property, the negotiations would be between the property owner and the Town of South Burlington with approval necessary from the Highway Department and the Bureau of Public Roads in accordance with the "Agreement Pertaining to the Regulation and Control of Traffic for Project U 528-2 (1)". The Department apologizes for any doubts that may have developed in the Town of South Burlington relative to the municipality's responsibility in this matter. Sincerely G R. H. Arnold Chief Engineer RHA:CFK:lb cc: E. H. Stickney C. F. Laythe Utility File Central Files. RECE ! APR 2 1970 MANIn4 Fw'; oFI it_F,: Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MrETING,st�z6 Mr. Sargent read memorandums from the Town Manager, Mr. Ward, Zoning Adminis- trator, and the Town Engineer. Yx. Szymanski requested that there be one curb out. Mr. Pizzagalli agreed to all the stirml.ations in the memorandums. Mr. Sargent said he feels service stations are overbuilt in comparison to demand and there is a guidline of one station ner 1000 ponul.ation. On this basis we would need ten and ;now have twenty-five. Mr. Behney pointed out that we are a tourist -oriented community and on this basis might require more than would normally be the case. Ix. Lamphere and Mr. Ravelin stated they thought a neighborhood shopping center would be an_asset in this area, but Mr. Pizzzagalli said these are not always as well maintained. Mr. :^llard took exception to suggestions by members of the Planning Commission telling an individual how to, use his r land. However, after considerable discussion, most all members were of the opinion the Cnn ni.ssion has the right to free and oven discussion on any plan submitted. Mr. Ravelin wants it to be on record that he shares the Chair's opinion on Gas Stations and that the Planning Commission does have the right to control - use of land. Mr. Allard withdrew his objection. _A. motion was made by Mr. All-rd,, seconded by Mr. Lamphere that the sub- division study plan, with the three memorandums from the Town Manager, Zoning Administrator and Town Engineer, be approved in general concent, subject to approval of a detailed plan by the Commission. All were In favor. Homer Dubois Request Mr. Sargent explained that this is a preliminary hearing before a public hearing for a Subdivision Plan. No changes were made in the Dlsn as »resented and Mr. Dubois was advised to anply to the Town Manager for a *public hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Page 4 September 9, 1969 and support for a feasibility study of South Burlington's establishing its own electric light department, but since the discourse consisted of opinions only, unsupported by factual evidence, it has not been included in these minutes. In answer to a question, Mr. Fayette said there is no enabling legislation to study a county system. Mr. Sinclair ended the discussion by complimenting the Planning Commission for calling this "enlightening meeting." Adjournment was at 10 p.m. and meeting' convened at 10:15 p.m. SAN REMO REALTY CORPORATION Representative presented revised plan; it was studied and discussed along with recom- mendations of town engineer and of town manager, which are attached to these minutes. Mr. LeClair stated the original plan was for three lots and now there are four; sug- gested one of the buildings be deleted and instructed plan have three lots delineated. Mr. Chittenden moved plan be accepted after all recommended changes in attached docu- ments are made, one property line is deleted and lots designated as 1, 2 and 3. Mr. Ravlin seconded the motion and there was unanimous approval. REGIONAL77M ' OFFICER Mr. Behney suggested holding a discussion with the Board of Selectmen regarding hiring a sanitary engineer. No motion needed. CONSOLIDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION AND ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. Mr. Reynolds asked for reasons for including this item on agenda. Mr. Sargent read from the Vermont Planning Development Act that Planning and Zoning boards could be one and the same, citing his belief this would lend itself to good enforcement. He said the law permits up to nine members on such a joint board. Discussion followed re whether such a move would be feasible for a town the size of South Burlington. Mr. Sargent feels requests for variances would diminish in number. Mr. Behney feels the Board of Adjustment has been working under handicap without an updated master plan to be fully informed on future plans; this would also, he feels, lead to better understand- ing between boards. Consolidation appeared unpopular, rather many expressed the feel- ing more meetings between town boards would improve the present lack of understanding. March 12, 1970 r•zr. Angelo Pizzagallil Pres. San Remo Realty Corp. Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear 11r. Pizzagalli: In regard to our discussion of this dater evidence shows that no final plan has been recorded. Enclosed is a copy of the only plan on file approved by the Planning Com!lission. This plan shows no road openings on Kennedy Drive. In talking with Mr. Lamphere, he advises that a single curb cut was accepted if a permit from the State Highway Dept. could be obtained. Thereforet until this matter can be resolved and in accordance with Section 13.25 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance, I am revoking the building permit. Very truly, Richard Ward Code Officer RW/ j T PA1 S to RAMAI.V 14 TN/t 09'tA'4� N r \• � ` \ -� /NSTAGL Nd1✓ /p its \\a, (yJARO ,RA/l. L Z /s• ci4YS47 �T LUy� s's<�L v�•'Q Al \ 1 7 60 f - 1 O - •i �'� // // ! a j "45 PNr4 L.T-� <.Ax ; � r �XKYfu6, G:'R8 i77 \ i \ C EX/STIiL s /AZ-DIA..a 1! - i S Ark, .PT �p:-� I BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING (/ JUNE 15, 1970 SAN REMO CORPORATION REFERRAL FROM THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT a Mr. Pizzagalli did not take part in this discussion. Chairman Behney reviewed the steps that led to the consideration of this appeal, and said that at this point the Board had charged itself to view the site of the proposed curb cuts, to review the Planning Commission's and Zoning Board of Adjustment's minutes, the Town Attorney's written opinion, and the Agreement between the State of Vermont Highway Board and the Town of South Burlington on Kennedy Drive. The men had visited the site and had received and studied all the material referring to the appeal. He said the evidence brought out that the State of Vermont considers Kennedy Drive a State Aid Highway, making it necessary that the Board of Selectmen should give approval or disapproval of the Kennedy Drive curb cuts, with the plans being reviewed and approved by the Department of Highways of the State of Vermont. Selectmen questioned Mr. Szymanski, Town Engineer, as to whether the roa,� was considered an arterial or collector road and what his reaction would be to shortening both the islands, to which he replied that it was an arterial road, and he would have no objection to the shortening of the islands. Mr. Benjamin Schweyer, Attorney for the San Remo Corporation, spoke in behalf of his client, saying the Planning Commission had already decided the plan is acceptable, the Vermont Highway Department withdrew its permission only when it found out it could not give such permission, and pointed out that 1Lhe matter has been around since last August. Mr. Behney, Chairman, explained the entire period of time since August was not all concerned with the curb cuts, said the nature of the locality was definitly for commercial use, and questioned if the time and discussion involved would have resulted if the request had come from church interests, for instance. i BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING JUNE 15, 1970 SAN REMO CORP. REFERRAL FROM THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CONTINUED Selectmen Premo and Blais mentioned several situations that could occur because of the curb cuts and cause traffic accidents. Mr. Stearnssaid the question before the Board was whether or not to approve the request, that the Highway Department had accepted it, the Planning Commission had approved it, and the firm interested in locating on the site was certainly well versed in the study of traffic control and safety. After a rather lengthy discussion concerned mainly with traffic hazards caused by curb cuts and how to avoid them, Mr. Stearns made a motion to approve the granting of a permit for the curb cuts as delineated in Project #18, dated September 4, 1969, based on all the evidence received. Mr. Premo seconded the motion, but said he preferred to have the motion amended to add"that approval was granted after great controvsy and discussion". Chairman Behney called for discussion. Wording of the motion was revised and the Board then drafted another motion. Mr. Stearns then withdrew the original motion and Mr. Premo withdrew his second to the motion. Mr. Blais made a motion that the South Burlington Board of Selectmen Gyv rA- cv-G �� 1lze.z� /, da X¢� /`7�/ % recommend approval of the curb cuts as delineatede However, since the Board is unable to judge as to the safety of said curb cuts, the Board of Selectmen request a review from the point of safety by the State Depart- ment of Highways, and if considered safe within the highway use, to 1 grant said curb cuts as delineated. Such action taken in accordance 1 with Agreement Pertaining to the Regulation and Control of Traffic, Project U-528-2, South Burlington, page 1, paragraph B, dated May 5, 1964. Mr. Premo seconded the motion which passed unanimously. LAW OFFICES OF JOHN T. EWING &6 ST. PALL. STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 May 2t Douglass S. Stuart Mikell & Stuart 144 South Willard Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Appeal of San Remo Corporation. to South Burlington toning Board Dear Doug: I have your letter of May 21, asking an three questions in connection with the above appeal, sty opinions are as follows s 1. Scope of authority of Zoning Administrator (Paragraph 1 of your letter) - Seaction 8.67 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance sags: "No curry cuts or vehicle entrance shall be built or maintainers except upon approval of the Zoning Administrator*. This section contains no specific standards whereby the administrator is to judge whether or not such a permit should be granted. Where: are no other specific sections in the Ordinance expressly relating to they standards to be employed by the Zoning Administrator to judge the granting of permits under this section. However, the appeal submitted by Saul Pemo Realty cites nine sections of the Ordinance which could be re leevan t to curb pe rmi tale . It is my opinion that the Zoning Administrator is limited in his discretion to deny this permit. If the Ordinance contained specific standards, then he can judge the application for the peera►it only upon those standards. If the Ordinance contains no standards, trier: the unlimited grant to him of authority to approve or disapprove, based on no particular standards, would be void under general law. LAW OFFICES OF .JOHN T_ EVWING Douglas 86 ST� PAUL STREET S. Stuarts (C�� page 2 BORLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 .May 26, 1970 1Rathkopf on Zoning and Planning, 55-5, states "A permit for a legal use may not be refused for reasons extraneous to the zoning ordinance; and administrative officer charged with the duty of examining applications for and issuing permits is bound by the restrictions of the ordinance and may not refuse a permit for matters not within the scope of his discretion. McQuillan on municipal Corporations, Section 25.216 (Pages 103-104) states: "Zoning ordinances cannot confer arbitrary or unlimited power or authority upon boards or officials. Moreover, zoning measures must establish a rule or standard to govern boards and officials charged with their administration and to guarantee uniformity of operation in all cases.. to allow the granting or refusal of zoning pe=its...without any standard to guide them, denies equal protection of the law and is invalid." Therefore, if the decision of the zoning adminis- trator, in this case, were based on standards not contained in the zoning ordinance, his decision would have to be overruled by the. Zoning Board of Adjustment. 2. Scope of reviews by the Zoning Board (Paragraph. 2 Of your letter) •- if, based upon gay opinion in Paragraph 1, the Zoning Board overrules the Zoning Administrator, the Board should specifically find that the application for a permit for the curb cut is in conformity with the provisions of the South Burlington: Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, under 13.100 of the Ordinance, the Board "...may make such order or decision as ought to be made, and to that end shall have all the powers of the officer from whow the appeal is taken." Therefore, Z believe that the Board could proceed to issue the permit. t. 3 ., Requirement of permit from Town for curb cut on Hinesburg .Road (Paragraph 3 of your letter) - LAW OFFICES OF JOHN T_ EWING 86 ST, PAUL STREET BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 Douglas S. Stuart, Lsq. Page 3 May 26, 1970 Title 19 VSA Section 43 provides for a permit obtained from the State Highway board, or Board of Selectmen, "within their respective Jurisdictions", for anyone constructing a driveway, entrance or approach. I read this section to mean that as to any state highway, only the approval of the State YI-gR%-iay Board need be obtained. As indicated, the approval of the Board of Selectmen must be obtained for any town highway. In view of Title 19 VSA Section 43, it is my opinion that Section 8.67 of the South Burlington Zoning ordinance -would not be applicable to state highways exclusively under the control of the State highway Board. d% 4. Although not among the questions which you asked me, and of no particular concern to the Zoning Board, never- theless I would like to direct the attention of the Town to the requirements contained in an agreement between the Town and the State Highway Board dated May 5, 1964, which Agreement contains a provision that there shall be no curb openings or driveways other than those shown on the contract plans, until "...the plans for same have been reviewed and approved by the Department of Highways and the Bureau of Public Roads." This agreement applies to Kennedy Drive. Therefore, to permit the curb openings on Kennedy Drive, a permit would be required from the Board of Selectmen under Title 19 VSA Section 43 as cited above, with the approval of the Department of Highways and the Bureau of Public Roads. if this letter does not fully answer the questions which you have stated, please let me know. Very truly yours, John T. Wing May 6. 1970 San Remo Realty Corp. Joy Drive South hurlington, 7 05401 Attention: James Pizzagalli Dear Mr. Pizzagalli: Having investigated the matter of curb cuts on Kennedy Drive and having had discussions with the Town Engineer and the Traffic Consultant from the South T>urlington Police Dept., my findings are that allowing curb cuts on Kennedy Drive would defeat the whole purpose of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. According to police records this intersection is already a moderately hazardous one, also if the installation of curb cuts were allowed it would defeat the purpose of channel- ization, therefore this writer will not issue any curb cut permits that ,,ill increase the potential of an already hazardous intersection. Very truly, Richard Ward Zoning Administrator RW/ j April 30, 1970 Pizzagalli Construction Co. Mr. James Pizzagalli Joy Drive South ?'urlington, VT 05401 Subject: Kennedy Plaza Dear Mr. Pizzagalli: The final plan of the 11'ennedy Plaza complex which received Planning Commission approval as of Tlarch 24, 1970 has been properly recorded by the Town Clerk, all in accordance with the regulations set forth by Title 24, V.S.A. Chapter 65. In regard to the notice of April 17, 1970 from the office of Mr. Pxnold., Hirhway Chief Engineer, this writer has no control over any ,atters pertaining to traffic and highway regulations, therefore the permit is not the responsibility of this vTiter. In accordance with sect;on P.67 of the South Furlington Zoning; Ordinance approval h<;: I n -ranted with the acception of the final plan however approval of this plan does not negate the necessity of obtaining a curb opening; permit from th,-� office of the Town Engineer. "'he Yuildin' permit issued from this office was revoked on March 12, 1970 due to a technical.-i_ty in the recording of a plot plan. This matter has now been resolved and the permit has been reinstated. Very truly, Richard 'A'ard Zoning; Administrator RW/ j SAN REMO REALTY CORPORATION A Member of the Pizzagalli Organization JOY DRIVE/SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 802/658-4100 May 5, 1970 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator Town of South Burlington 555 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Dick: Re Phillips Service Station Kennedy Plaza Bill Szymanski has informed me that he does not wish to issue the curb cut permits for Kennedy Drive. It is my understanding that such permits are to be issued by the Zoning Administrator under the authority granted him at Section 8.67 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. I do not know of any ordinance granting power to the Town Engineer to issue curb cut permits, but it is possible that one exists, and if so I would appreciate your bringing it to my attention. If the granting of this permit is not the Town Engineer's responsibility, and if Section 8.67 is the only controlling ordinance, then I would appreciate your giving us a permit so that work can proceed. In the event that you have any special forms which must be completed or require any additional information please let me know and I will comply with your require S. Sieasurer ly urs J Pizzagalli' T JP:bls OFFICE OF; THE COMMISSIONER STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MONTPELIER 05602 February 25, 1970 Mr. Angelo Pizzagalli, Pres. San Remo Realty Corporation �`]t , Joy Drive ` ` )�70 South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: South Burlington - Kennedy Drive '/>� 197p Dear Mr. Pizzagalli : AC�Cj I C(�IVN I- _4 We are enclosing your copy of permit for curb cuts on the above -referenced highway per sketch attached. Please note special conditions made a part of this permit. This copy is for your records. Very truly yours, G. W. Ayers Utilities Engineer GWA:cja cc: C. F.Laythe, Dist. Engr., Dist. 5 Utility File Central Files MOTICE STATE OF VERMONT This permit covers only rights DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS vested in the State Highway Board over this highway. PERMIT Permission is hereby requested by .......San Remo RealtyCo rporation .... ............ ............ to perform the work described as follows, on the highway known as.Kennedy Pri.ye. ........ in the Town (Towns) of .. . ..... South Burlington, Vermont .............. ................... ........ ........... A the location of this work being Intersection of Hinesburg Road & Kennedy .Drive ... ................. .......... . .. .... ........ ................ .......... . ........ ........ Description of the work to be performed (attach sketch) ... ..... ..... -.- . ..... --- Enclosed.Dra ............... ....................... ................ — Win.g ......................... 0 .... . ....... ........ ..... .... .. ..... ...... ........ ................... I .......... ........... ............. ..... .... ....... . 0 o. .. . ............. ... ..... Permit to extend from May 1 . ...................... 19 7.0, .. to... June ... 1 ....... . ig 7.0.... The undersigned, in consideration of the approval of this permit, having duly read all of the con- tents herein, expressly agrees to the directions and to the restrictions and conditions listed below and printed on the reverse side of this sheet. witness ......... )W; older) SAN . ............... .................... I ........... .......... -U-MQ...R)�AWY ............ ... (Per t H _pn Witness.....By- . . . ... .......... V '4 Address .... Box ... 200 ' 9 .......... South Burlington, Vermont (Use Only for Joint Permit) Witness ...................... ........ ...... .. ......... .......(Permit Holder) Witness_ .............. .... .. . ... .. .......... .. . ..... By - ... ............. .. ........... ........... ............ . Address... ... .............. . ............ .................... ............ . APPROVAL This permit is issued with the following directions, restrictions and conditions, and covers only the work described hereinafter, and then only when the work described is performed as directed, and subject to the following special conditions: Drives will be graded to allow a minimum amount of water ........... ....... ................................ - .............. amount. .. . ..... to drain onto Highways. ............................... I ..... — I ..... ......... .... ...... ... ............... ... I ..................................................... .. ..... ... — ............................................................................................. Dated at ...... Vermont This.. day of.... February, ......... 1970..... ............................ ... Arnold, ........ . Chief Enginer it......... I .. ...... ............ ... * *' Assistant Chief F Ift neer SEE OTHER SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS No work shall be done under this permit until the party or parties to whom it is granted shall have communicated with and received instructions from the District 1;1#ARP@1 Engineer C. F. Laythe. .......... ...... ....... .. I ................. I ....... ..... .... . ..... ..... ..... ..... ... I ..... ..... HD 210 Revised 3-69 RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS General Conditions: The word `Board" as used herein is to mean the Vermont State Highway Board. The word "Engineer" as used herein is to mean the authorized agent of the Chief Engineer. The word "Department" as used herein is to mean the Vermont Department of Highways. Permit is granted subject to compliance with all Federal and State Statutes or regulations controlling occupancy of Public High- ways, and adherence to all governing Local or National Codes, unless specific conditions quoted herein are more restrictive. All rock blasting, as well as other work, shall comply with all the laws and regulations of the State of Vermont. The permit holder must, in every case where there is a possibility of injury to life or property in blasting, batten down the blast with heavy chain logs and to prevent the stone from scattering, he shall place on said chain logs a blasting mat or bags of sand as a makeweight to hold the blast. During the progress of the work all structures under ground shall be properly protected from damage or injury; such barrier shall be erected and maintained as may be necessary for the protection of the traveling public; the same shall be properly lighted at night; and the party or parties to whom this permit is issued shall be responsible for all damages to person or property due to or resulting from any work done under this permit. Except as herein authorized, no excavation shall be made or obstacle placed within the limits of the State Highway in such a manner as to interfere unnecessarily with the travel over said road. If any grading or sidewalk work done under the permit interferes with the drainage of the State Highway in any way, such catch basins and outlets shall be constructed as may be necessary, in the opinion of the Engineer, to take proper care of said drainage. Wherever the hardened surface of the roadways is disturbed and the Engineer may consider it necessary or advisable to do so, said surface will be restored by the employees of the Department, at such time as the Department may direct, and the expense thereof shall be borne by the party or parties to whom the permit is issued, who shall purchase and deliver on the road the materials necessary for said work, as directed by the Enginer. All payments to laborers, inspectors, etc., employed by the Department for or on account of the work herein contemplated shall be made by said party or parties forthwith on the receipt of written orders, payrolls, or vouchers, ap- proved by the Department. If the party or parties to whom this permit is issued does any work contrary to the orders of the Engineer and, after due notice, falls to correct such work or to remove such structure or material as he or they may be ordered to remove the Department may, with or without notice, correct such work or remove such structure or material; and the party or parties to whom this permit is issued shall reimburse the State for any expense incurred in correcting the work or removing the structure or material. All of the work herein contemplated shall be done under the supervision and to the satisfaction of the Department of Highways, and the entire expense thereof shall be borne by the party or parties to whom this permit is issued. On the completion of the work herein contemplated all rubbish and debris shall be removed and the roadway and roadsides shall be left neat and presentable and satisfactory to the Engineer. The Department hereby reserves the right to order the change of location or the removal of any structure or structures authorized by this permit at any time; said change or removal to be made by and at the expense of the party or parties to whom this permit is granted, or their successors or assigns. This permit may be modified or revoked at any time by the Department without rendering said Department or the State of Vermont liable in any way. The party or parties to whom this permit is issued shall pay the salary, subsistence and traveling expenses of any inspector ap- pointed by the Department to supervise the work herein contemplated. All of the above conditions shall be applicable to the work herein authorized, unless the same are inconsistent with the conditions on the face of the permit, in which case the conditions written or printed on the face of the permit shall apply. The acceptance of this permit or the doing of any work thereunder shall constitute an agreement by the party or parties to whom this permit is granted to comply with all of the conditions and restrictions printed or written herein. Relating to Erection of Poles, Wires and Overhead Structures, and the Cutting and Trimming of Trees This permit is granted on condition that the Permittee shall obtain the written consent of the adjoining owners or occupants, or an alternative order from the S+ate Highway Board in accordance with Title 30, Section 2506, Vermont Statutes Annotated. In general, the centerline of the aerial utility facility shall be located along and closely adjacent to the highway right-of-way bound- ary line. No poles, push braces, or other appurtenances of the facility shall be placed closer than thirty (30) feet from the edge of pavement unless the existing right-of-way is insufficient in width. Should the location of the utility plant covered by this Permit be in conflict with the above, each location must be approved by the Highway official authorizing this Permit, and then only if in his opinion - the minimum clearance cannot be obtained. In the event that observance of the minimum standard will result in the placing of such pole or appurtenance, within 4.0' of the center line of a maintained or natural ditch, the facility may not be placed between the ditch and the roadway, but must be so installed that a minimum distance of 4.0' shall be maintained between the center line of the ditch and the face of the pole or appurtenance. In no event shall poles or appurtenances thereto be placed within 4.0' of either side of the center line of a maintained or natural ditch or within 10.0' of the inlet or outlet of a culvert or any type of waterway which crosses tine highway. No anchor guys, pushbraces or other appurtenances shall cross a ditch and thereby be installed between the ditch and roadway. No aerial utility facility shall be installed in a picnic or rest area, or area which is used for the stockpiling of highway construc- tion or maintenance materials except in cases of extreme hardship or other extenuating circumstances, and then by special permit by the Department. In the erection of pole lines, unless otherwise herein provided, no trees within the limits of the State Highway shall be cut or trimmed. No guy wires shall be attached to trees without a special permit from the Department, and in no event shall they be so attached as to girdle tie trees or in any way interfere with their growth. The wires shall be so protected at all times and places that they shall not interfere with or injure the trees inside or outside the location of the highway. Where the cutting or trimming of trees is authorized by permit, only such cutting and trimming shall be done as may be desig- nated by the Engineer. All debris resulting from such cutting and trimming shall be removed from the highway limits. In order to protect the trees through which any wires may pass, said wires shall be insulated and such other tree guards shall be used as may be directed by the Engineer. Relating to Laying of Pipes, Conduits, Etc. In general, underground utility facilities shall be located as close as practical to the highway right-of-way boundary line, and shall be installed in such manner that no damage will result to highway property. A minimum depth of 2'-6" under the ground surface will normally be required. If placed in a maintained portion of the highway, they shall be installed in a conduit or duct system which is accessible by property installed manholes in order that future additions or maintenance work shall not disturb a paved surface, or if not so installed, such facility shall be abandoned in place, in the event that repairs become necessary after the highway has been paved. $hQuld the location of the underground utility plant covered by this Permit be in conflict with the above, each location must be approved by the Highway official authorizing this Permit, and then only if in his opinion the minimum clearance cannot be obtained. Any duct system so installed shall be abandoned in place, in the event that a conflict occurs due to the requirements of a future highway project, or the duct system shall be moved under such provisions regarding time and place or removal as shall be designated by the Department of Highways in a special contract provision, and any expense to the Department of Highways or the contractor, incurred because of delay beyond the time limit of the Special Provision, shall be recovered from the owner of the underground facility. After any pipes, conduits, drains or other underground structures are laid, or any excavation is made in the roadway, the trenches or openings shall be properly back -filled with suitable approved material; the back -fill shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Engineer, and the surface of the road over said structures shall be left even with the adjoining ground. If the work is done in cold weather no frozen material shall be used for back -filling. Whenever the hardened surface of the roadway, gutters or any part of the surface of the highway is disturbed it shall be replaced in as good condition as before it was disturbed, and if new materials are required they shall correspond with those already in place on the road. Where service pipes are to cross the highway the connections shall be made without disturbing the hardened surface of the road- way by jacking or boring the pipes under the roadway, or the service pipes shall be carried under and across the road in a large pipe, unless otherwise ordered by the Engineer. The party or parties to whom the permit is granted shall maintain the surface of the roadway over said structures as long as the Department may deem necessary, until all signs of the trench shall have been eliminated. HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OFFICE MEMORANDUM 7 0: Gleazon W. A'yoro' Utilities zqs'inear FROM; Chester F. Laytho, District HiChway ZaCinoOr 0 ATE: Doca�ber 23, 1969 SUBJECT: Application for cuej cut, Kannady Dzive, South Burlinatoa Lnolosed herewith is an application for a curb out on the north side of Xenzacdy Drive froze tho,pizza,,oralli Construction Company. Tiiz aplilication is boin,,- for.ar%dlod to you as, according to the PortaininS to tho rZa6yulation and Control of Traffic for Pro.Jact U 523-2 (1), all curb oponinCo, and dFivowaya other than those shown on the Contract Plans L-act be reviewed and approved by the Dapart=ant of EiZhuraya "v:! the Bureau of Public Roada. You 11 ;iote that the skotch accoa-::anyina Le_ i atioq_does Lot, --`z3lands at the of Kennedy Drive and lline3burZ zcoad (". --"te * 116). We h ro included a okotch showing the islands for iafo=Zation purposes only. it is raoo=3aded the application not be aporoved as it wDuld be in violation of the intent of the roferrad to above.. C'?L: c a La Laol. (a) HO-296A JtXM 12-06 TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT M E M O R A N D U M TO: RICHARD WARD RE: CURB CUTS FOR PHILIPS 66 ON KENNEDY DRIVE FROM: WILLIAM SZYMANSKI, TOWN ENGINEER DATE: MARCH 121 1970 I am opposed to any curb cuts in the arga of an island at a channalized intersection. This I feel is a potential traffic hazard and defeats the purpose of the channalization. It is also against our standards for curb openings, adopted in February 1969. The curb cuts at,this location were approved by the Town Planning Commission against my recommendations. The State Highway Department and the Federal Bureau of Public Roads, which also have jurisdiction over this road as per agree- ment with the Town, prior to construction, approved these curb cuts against my recommendations and against the recommendations of the local Highway District Engineer. If a permit from me is also necessary, and I believe it should be because we maintain this road, I will not issue one. I will not affix my signature to any document, permit or otherwise, if in my judgment granting such permit would jeopardize the safety of anyone at anytime regardless of prior approval of any other agency having jurisdiction over the matter, as in the case of the curb cuts on Kennedy Drive. cc Bob Janes I M E M O R A N D U M TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: WILLIAM J. SZYMANSKI, TOWN ENGINEER SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF N.E. CORNER KENNEDY DRIVE AND HINESBURG ROAD AUGUST 26, 1969 501 Scale and Prints 1. O.K. 502 Statement of Development Plans 1. None submitted 503 Plan Data a. None b. 0.K., , c. Access to future lots not shown. d. Plans not stamped but were received August 22, 1969. f. O.K. g. None shown h. O.K. i. None j. N.A. k. O.K. COMMENTS 1. Section B of the agreement between the town and the state dated July 15, 1961, regarding curb cuts on Kennedy Drive reads as follows: "No curb openings or driveways other than those shown on the contract plans shall be provided on the project now or at any future time until the plans for same have been reviewed and approved by the Department of Highways and the Bureau of Public Roads'. 2. Gas station entrance setback from the intersection does not conform to town standards. To: Mr. LeClair From: Richard Ward Date: August 19, 1969 Re: Zoning pertaining to new construction of Phillips Petroleum and New Office Building. Phillip's Petroleum Area zoned business B 300' x 2000' Set back - okay // 0 Use - okay Off street parking 1 parking space for every 500 square feet. Print shows three 40' curb cuts. /j�evi5e� Buffer zoned of 15' = print shows three areas. Print of sign shows 8' 0" x 81011 rotating type. New Office Building / Area zoned planned district. Use of this type being Business A. ' Building set back required 25 feet. Prints show approximately 25 feet. Off street parking = 1 space per 200 square feet: shown 26 spaces Buffer zone of 15 feet. Seven (7) spaces shown on print as being in buffer zone. Lot size questionable as shown on print. M ENO RAN D U M TO: PLANNING COMMISSION PROM: TOWN MANAGER SUBJECT: SAN REMO REALTY CORPORATION APPEAL DATE: AUGUST 26, 1969 After reviewing the proposed sub -division plan of San Remo Realty Corporation's northeast corner of Iiinesburg Road - Kennedy Drive intersection I find no serious departure from Subdivision Regula- tions except for the following: 1. The Phillips' south entrance is less than the suggested 50' from the intersection. This is necessary if we are to install a vehicle actuated control device in the near. future. 2. The subdivision should have an identifying name. — 3. The gas station appears to be on a lot less than 30,000 square feet -- Business B zone requires 40,000 square feet. A variance or additional area would be a necessary condition of approval. 4. No public way or future road access is shown on the north side of the property. it is my opinion none is necessary, due to topography, brook, and proposed conservation area to be purchased by the town. The conservation area presently has access from three points. Remaining land in-between can be developed off - Hinesburg Road without access to either side. 5. In view of the limited nature of curb cuts on Kennedy Drive, the Planning Commission may consider access for the two future office buildincgs at this time. a � 1--►► .-rsI . "•_-_----' __. flo C. � '- ' -+ 1 1 ,D�Y+CG(/G �-�� ,rl �trr r 'I, �- ,.� r ,\' �1-_-,`_ __`�J_\_�"—.._=_ r ib , \ Sri' ��'` _` _ sew i. .�� • i� s , /�' • q ` . rf _ r .� -, 1 ._ •�: 7a 4f Al'. LJq,'�•id -' - •+ sf ,•�' /r ' '� a `iV .,r+�Ti) ��.�4=J lyil �i- e1 ._ � (. d 6 • +�y J �-r i QtR / 4% 7g �4..ti ; 1. 1 '1" —=T".-- - • _ •. �!'.L ��•"aoac uuoic �;:rS .\ a�~` r .` s \L •s i \ 1' 10�F1C, tt``.i D,p _ ha.� ,�ewp a••tu r s �-t{• \r . \�Ou� r r s\ 1 J �:OCIt a t"^ a \ ` .Y �• l r'� ..,rr Y\� .. ' Ir llr a! s !s � r.f, 1 .u<✓i oJv .. LGC�. �: - �.. ''' a �'~t - + - " '\ \: 1. rP [L7 \ ; .� 1 `2r i.0�. w�Lr+S,rip. � _ .✓' - -_ - _ . � __ �e ir1�' M1'r•.\ .� 1 `.� niwr _� - ?��1�' � v,• •l`�,NNC��'. .. .•, - -I.+'' \ •1. .l ,fi, k Ic moo t. 'l., r \ \ •� ''T _ •tom - `\ �� , '.\ � •�� ll - `„ C • "+t � fir. .f \, ,� ,`v ; .. ,� � , I A A Z7YN cIL%rjL.. ' / ~ Y.,rr pop ♦ \ \. , . , ' ♦ .. . ; ' • \ •\ \ . \ I _ �.�.. - \ _ APPROVED , ' r.•.i�IIwC w..�n,•.rI ',. . RMS w1 R��J-��LT�r , `I �,' \` \\ \ \\\ \i S&JT BJRUNG70M NM: tiJ.%'.y:YIOM • 41, +� 1y XCAJ•tJCDY PLALA • s AKAJL1EGY DGNE 5 SO. 1S 7l14/d/GTOA! • ✓r. WEws,re vtAA1 s - . TOPO4MIM.. aAu\Gev :KORw.tMM ..•,a.r ..• aw ...,...• �•: . � ? � • . 111►C1D rROM 1•ww,llc5 Or �~ s , - IMtA Cwa•RGt wrvc Ir[. - + J6t0 4-1.0t /":qe' J'4+F.At• R6• l j c• tear I wcnor Vt.- . �. /t211CNt1 (SliR1t9C410a (WItaH .. .�`.'`a�'. 11:3arin7 Datev 0//17PAdvt. Date M dvertise 6 days r prior to meeting, I�urlin,rton .'I'onir�, I nard of Adjustment '.,'urlin-ton, Very ."ont a,.)Y)eai to tho ',ning, Eoard of Adjustment for Uile followin,, 6 -z;,Iarir? t,wt -e:Ain: dates are tl-ie, first and tL.,11-6 "j", of lle mont;, r t. 7:4'0 P.,'. at the South Turlingtor IA-J) I j L d'vo,,c.ise-ieri, as Lelol.:) j- a,') n o a r and I area a fee o" --,f; re t'if- ,d ,L i',) e ar s , _30.0,0 which fee il,: r , ( I) I I - , Or 1101'�.111 s-I.-Id laearinC,. lZ�0 A r.�Lddress Da t SOUTIi IUAit'LINGTON '70',TIIIG !:(!I!'10E Y:;rItALn:,,ton Zoning J'oard of Adjust-motit -,J11 hold a �1. ' ,Souti T'iirlinfrton igh Scliol e r i a I T c, r s e + ),)u t h Burlington, Z.0- Verriont on "Joyfft'i and �`ate) ...o consider' the following Appeal of San Remo Realty Corp., from the decision of the Zoning Administrative Officer disapproving curb cutsSection -8-.-�Melle entrance requirements ) South Burlington Zoning OrdinanceSonKennedy Dive and Hinesburg ,Road. n - -, 4 T O;JIT Or SOUTH DUR LINTGT OPT VER; iOT+T 555 DORSET STREET SOUTH BUR LINGT ON , VZh:IONT Date '.) .'lr Citizen: .Attached to this sheet is a copy of a legal notice: that is tc ap .g ar in tiic T url.in ;ton Free Press. °a hE; T.oard of Selectmen has instructed that this f 1r be sent t.c d jacent pronert;; mmers as a method of advising them of TO FROM FN " M� of 87-RM2 SUBJECT V/1_..___ woo, I No. 01 � y - IMF - - DATE SIGN� � V /. DATE SIGNED 0059'7 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT - KEEP PART 2 FOR FOLLOW-UP �,'� ��z �� ,Q C% ,�� s � v �' �..JJ�j � j APPEAL TO SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NOW COMES San Remo Realty Corporation, a Vermont Corporation with principal place of business at South Burlington, Vermont, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer" and brings this its Appeal pursuant to the provisions of Sec. 13.70 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance from the decision of the South Burlington Zoning Administrative Officer dated May 6, 1970 wherein the said official refused to grant two curb opening permits for a service station as shown on a plan entitled "Site Plan, Kennedy Plaza, Kennedy Drive, South Burlington, Vermont", dated September 4, 1969, and revised October 10, 1969, January 30, 1970 and March 23, 1970. The Zoning Adminis- trative Officer's authority for the granting of curb opening permits is provided at Sec. 8.67 of the said South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. In support of its appeal and to assist the Zoning Board of Adjustment in reaching a decision the Developer presents the following chronology of events which have a bearing on this Appeal: August 19, 1969 Code Officer prepares memorandum to Planning Commission with no comments included therein concerning curb openings in question. August 26, 1969 Town Manager recommends in memorandum to Planning Commission that South entrance of service station be at least fifty feet from intersection of Kennedy Drive and Vermont Route 116. Developer subsequently complied with request. August 26, 1969 Town Engineer recommends in memorandum to Planning Commission that entrance to service station be a minimum of fifty feet from intersection of Kennedy Drive and Vermont Route 116. Town Engineer pointed out the existance of Agreement Pertaining to the Regulation and Control of Traffic dated May 5, 1964 between the Town of South Burlington and the Vermont Highway Board. Agreement requires the approval of curb openings on Kennedy Drive by the Vermont Highway Department and the United States Bureau of Public Roads. Said approvals subsequently granted. August 26, 1969 Planning Commission meets to review request from San Remo Realty Corporation for approval of subdivision study plan Eva for Kennedy Plaza. Mr. Szymanski requests that only one curb opening be allowed. Planning Commission grants preliminary approval. September 9, 1969 Planning Commission grants approval of revised subdivision plan. December 9, 1969 Developer appears before Planning Commission to request two curb openings on Kennedy Drive for service station. Traffic problems at intersection of Vermont Route 116 and Kennedy Drive are discussed as well as the possible installation of traffic lights at the said intersection. Plan is approved with two curb openings for Kennedy Drive, subject to approval of Vermont Department of Highways and the United States Bureau of Public Roads. February 20, 1970 Vermont Highway Department issues permit for Kennedy Drive curb openings. March 10, 1970.Town of South Burlington issues building permit. March 12, 1970 Town of South Burlington revokes building permit because of absence of final plan in land records. March 24, 1970 Planning Commission confirms approval of December 9, 1969, and Developer agrees to furnish final plan to Zoning Administrative Officer. April 17, 1970 Highway Department revokes Kennedy Drive permit on the theory that it never had the authority to issue the permit but only had the authority to authorize the Town's issuance of the permits pursuant to the aforementioned Agreement Pertaining to the Regulation and Control of Traffic dated May 5, 1964. Highway Department refers Developer to Town of South Burlington for issuance of curb opening permits. April 30, 1970 Zoning Administrative Officer approves final plan, reinstates building permit, and refers Developer to Town Engineer for curb opening permit. Zoning Administrative Officer disclaims respon- sibility for issuance of curb opening permits. -3- May 4, 1970 Highway Department issues curb opening permit for Vermont Route 116. May 5, 1970 Developer requests curb opening permits from Zoning Administrative Officer. May 6, 1970 Zoning Administrative Officer refuses to grant curb Iopening permits because such approval, in the words of said official, would "defeat the whole purpose of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance." Said official further stated that the intersection of Kennedy Drive and Vermont Route 116 is "hazardous". In support of its Appeal the Developer argues that at no place in the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance is the Zoning Administrative Officer granted the power or the duty to conduct independent inquiries as to the advisability or feasibility of granting curb opening permits, especially when such considerations have previously been disposed of by the Planning Commission. The said South Burlington Zoning Ordinance contains no standards or criteria for the issuance of curb opening permits. However, Sec. 13.20 of the said South Burlington Zoning Ordinance provides that building permits shall be issued after the Zoning Administrative Officer determines that the plans for the building and the 'intended use conform with the ordinances. By analogy, the Developer argues that in deciding whether to issue a curb opening per the Zoning Administrative Officer should determine whether those portions of the ordinance which would be affected by a curb opening are being complied with. Among others, the following sections of the ordinance could be affected by curb openings: Section 8.40 Yard requirements Section 8.60 Off street parking Section 8.61 Location of parking Landscaping Section 8.62 Drainage of parking area Screening of parking area Section 8.64 Access to parking space Section 8.66 Off street loading Section 12.25 Front yard requirements on Williston Road and Shelburne Road Section 12.40 Lots on accepted streets Section 13.130 Subdivision regulations ML -4- It is the Developer's contention that, in deciding whether to issue curb opening permits, the Zoning Adminis- trative Officer must confine his inquiry to the above considerations. All of the above considerations and requirements having been complied with, it is the Developer's further contention that it should be granted the required curb opening permits. In further support of its Appeal, the Developer brings the following facts to the attention of the Zoning Board of Adjustment: 1. The Shell Service Station located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Kennedy Drive and Vermont Route 116 has two curb openings on each street. 2. The Mobil Service Station located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Williston Road and Kennedy Drive has two curb openings on each street. 3. The property cannot be developed as a service station site without two curb openings on Kennedy Drive. 4. The Planning Commission, in four separate meetings, has considered carefully the matter of curb openings and has relied upon the advice of the Town Manager, the Town Engineer, the Code Officer, and such other persons as made their advice and comments to the said Planning Commission. After due deliberations, which included discussion of traffic hazards, intersection problems, channelization, and traffic lights, the said Planning Commission granted approval of the subdivision and the curb openings. 5. The Developer has complied with all reasonable requests of the Planning Commission and South Burlington departments and officials and stands ready to comply with applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and reasonable requests. For all of the foregoing reasons, and for other good and sufficient cause, the Developer requests the reversal of the decision of the Zoning Administrative Officer and the issuance of curb opening permits by the Zoning Board of Adjustment pursuant to powers granted it at Sec. 13.100 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said Developer has caused this Appeal to be signed by its Treasurer on this 14th day of May 1970. SAN REMO REALT--CIDRPORATION l By James Pizzagalli Treasurer May 14, 1970 San Remo Realty Corp, Joy Drive South I'urlingtonj VT 051+01 ,i;ttention: Mr. James Pizzagalli Dear Mr. Pizzagalli: This is to inform you that the South furling tan 'roning Foard of .',djustment will gold a public meeting at the .,outh Furlington High kSchool, Cafeteria !I, Dorset ,.,treet on '.�,ednesd.ay, 14ay 20, 1970 at 7:30 P-M. to consider your request for a vane . / Please plan to att�nd. Very truly, 1,"ichard Ward Code Officer RW/j Phillips 340 Main Madison, TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 06101 Tel. 868-2891 Petroleum Street New Jersey Gentlemen: Company 07940 February 9, 1971 Necessary permits for a service station at the north-east corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road in South Burlington were under consideration by the City of South Burlington for some time. Consideration of said permits were carried on in a careful and deliberate manner because it was the desire of the City that the structure to be built would be esthetically appealing, consistent with the architecture of the surrounding buildings; and, in keeping with the beauty of Kennedy Drive which is fast developing as one of South Burlington's better areas. Furthermore, serious questions were raised as to potential traffic hazards at this important intersection. On June 15, 1970, the Board of Selectmen approved the necessary curb cuts subject to a review by the Vermont Depart- ment of Highways as to the traffic hazard. The Vermont Department of Highways, in its letter of July 22, 1970 stated that the cuts would not constitute a traffic hazard. On July 27, 1970, the Town of South Burlington (we became a city on February 1, 1971) sent a letter to San Remo Realty Corp., approving the curb cuts. That letter also sought to reserve to the Board the power to revoke the curb cut permit if it were later determined that the curb cuts constituted a hazard. That letter did not properly represent the desires of the Board as provisional at its June 15, 1970 meeting and; therefore, a standard town permit, (signed by me) in regular form, was issued on July 28, 1970 superceding the letter of July .-*17, 1970. Phillips Petroleum Company Page 2 February 9, 1971 Recently the Phillips Petroleum Company has sought Planning Commission approval; i.e, via a change application, to build a sales outlet instead of a service station. The plan presented was a poor one. The Planning Commission, in its wisdom, rejected it. The building depicted was of low quality and out of context with the surrounding area. As stated above, this is one of our most important locations and areas of the City; and I feel that any building constructed on what soon will be one of the most important intersections should definitely be of top quality and be of an architectural design consistent with adjacent areas. Moreover, I feel confident that, unless a plan is submitted which achieves the effect of my above paragraph, the City Planning Commissioners may persist in its advice to decline to allow construction of a commercial building which is out of context with the surrounding area and certainly deviates from the approved plan. I say all of this in a heartfelt conviction that we should strive together to create the best in concepts and to see this high ideal realized at this location. Yours very truly, Robert M. Janes City Manager RMJ/h June 19, 1970 Mr. Ci-�Aater F. Laythe, listrict engineer State of Vermont Department of highways Essex Junction, Vermont 05402 Lear � r. Laythe : I enclose t,4e south burlington selectmen's action of June 15, 1970, on the curia cut application of ban Remo Corporation, as feferred from the South Burlington Zoning board of Adjustment. Z have underlined in red the motion on page 2, which, put succently, Deans. A. South Burlington board of Selectmen have approved 2 curb cuts on Kennedy Drive. B. Will the Department of highways, and the United States Bureau of Public Roads approve said cuts subject to a safety review by the authorities named in B? This, then, is an official request of our town in the matter, and Town Engineer W. J. Szymanski will accomplish all necessary paper work. Very truly yours, Robert A. Janes, Town rianager RMJ/h Enclosure 1 CC. C. h. behney, Chm., Board of Selectmen W. J. Szymanski, Town kngineer 1. W. Ward, Zoning Administrator San Remo Corporation July 27, 1970 San Remo Corp. Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05-401 a1ention: 'sir. James ?izzagalli Dear sir. ?izzagalli: This latter will serve as approval for curb cuts on Kennedy Drive at the intersection of Hinesburg Road as per plan o-n file in the ,Office of the Town Clerk. If in the judgement ofthe :_"out'ri '"u •lin-_,ton Selectmen, t1-1', drive locations are constituting a definite traffic hazard this permit can be revoked. Very truly, Richard '.Jard Zoning Administrator TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT TO: ROBERT M. JANES, TOWN MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM J. SZYMANSKI, TOWN ENGINEER RE: JOHN T. EWING, TOWN ATTORNEY'S LETTER OF 11/12/70 RE: SAN REMO REALTY EASEMENT DATE: November 24, 1970 It is unfortunate but what is done, is done. We are allowing a building to be constructed over a natural drainage course that drains approximately 70 acres, also a part of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road from Kennedy Drive southerly to Old Farm Road. If we can specify the type of pipe, I would recommend concrete Class IV minimum of 48" diameter. I think I would go along with John's recommendation and not accept a deed for an easement since it will be of little value, and, in the event of a problem, hopefully hold the developer responsible. V44, 40r-�- William J. Sz anski, Town Engineer. JOHN T. EWING RICHARD A. SPOKES LAW OFFICES OF JOHN T_ EWING 86 ST. PAUL STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 November 12, 1970 AREA CODE 802 863-2877 Robert M. Janes, Town Manager Town of South Burlington 555 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Bob: I have checked the proposed drainage easement from San Remo Realty on Kennedy Drive. The corporation in its previous deed to Reproco, Inc. reserved this easement, but agreed in the event of repair and maintenance of the pipe not to disturb the surface of the land. Therefore, San Remo cannot convey to the town any further rights to maintenance in view of this prior deed. I have discussed this with their attorney, who tells me that the pipe is deep in the ground and is under the gas station. I am not sure what drainage function this line performs and whether it is necessary for town purposes. If it is not, I would recommend that the proposed easement not be accepted, leaving future maintenance as a problem between private landowners instead of a burden for the town. Please let me know what you decide, as to the necessity of this easement from the town's standpoint. Very truly yours, L ✓ John T. Ewing JTE /p cc: Mr. William J. Szymanski I* SOUTH 3URLINGTON PLANNING COMiqIaSION i4il�i,,TING JA,NU�tttY 23, 1973 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting at 7:30 i'.M. On Tuesday, January 23, 1973, in the Conference Room of the Citx,Hall, 1175 Williston Rd, TUMBa RS PRESENT Chairman Douglas Tudhope, Arthur Bailey, Harold Brown, Mary Barbara Maher OTHERS PRESENT William Szymanski, Richard Ward, Code R. E. Curtis Mary Landry David E. Cueto Richard Roy,, Russell Tilley E. C. Calcagni A. Krapcho Gordon Wright Dthan A. H. Sims James Pizzagalli City Manager Offioer Charles Diggle Larry Leveillee Rollin L. Tilley Dorothy Guilford Charles Gluck Barbara Bull Thelma Tilley R. A. Schell Doro Sims Kay Neubert MINUTES OF DECENIBSR 26, 1972, and JANUARY 9, 1973. Commissioner: Maher �a'�d the minutes of December 26, 1972, should be changed ozL-:P. 1 under .the section on MINUTES_kto read :as follows:"The Minutes of December 5, 1973 were amended to add Mary Barbara haver to Members Present." Chairman Tudhope said that on P. 6 of the January 9, 1973 minutes the figure of4170,000 should be changed to 470,000, Commissioner Diary Barbara Maher moved to :accept the minutes of December 26.. 1972, as ' amended bg,, ofnmi.ssionei Raher and t:ie minutes of yy as amenaea by Unairman Tudhope. The motion was approved usIv. NA.TIONiLL LIFE SUBDIVISION Chairman Tudhope asked Mr. Roger Curtis to brief the Commission on changes made to the Subdivision Plan. Mr. Curtis explained that National Life had acted upon the following points in the memorandum from the City Manager, 1. Changed the intersection of the north and west roads to a 90 degree intersection. 2. Increased turning radii to meet specifications of gooseneck turn on frontage road. 3. Received letter from State Highway Dept. approving the concepts of a frontage road,the gooseneck turn,the eventual closing of Horticultural Ra., limited curb cut for Nordic Ford, and intersection of service road onto:.Shelburne Rd. opposite Bartlett`,s Bay Rd. 4. Made 3 contacts with University officials with the result that they are agreeable with concept of eventually making common use of National Life's service road and closing the lower portion of Horticultural Rd. Mr. Curtis said the Board of Trustees will have the final say. 5. The 401,:,cul' dp'sao As:not a city_:, standard. He said the city standard exceeds the State standard. Mr. Curtis stated he beligved National Life has met all criteria asked for by the Planning Commission at the meeting of January 9, 1973. Commissioner Mary Barbara Maher asked who was the landscape architect. Mr. Curtis said Mr. Peter Bergh, Mr. Curtis said the circles on the plan represent Sugar Maples which will be 14-16' high at planting time. He 50UTA dUtibINGTUN PLANNING 00i4IVIISSION !�'ii�;1�,Tr1'�(x J ,IJU:�.ttY �.5, 19'43 said all raw slopes or anything that is disturbed will be grassed. He said some fill will be put on the west side of the gooseneck, Mr. Curtis said Mr. 3111 Hall has reviewed the planting and seeding specifications. Mr. Szymanski asks dd',tiiat :-the pasition:of trees be outside the right of way in order to make it easier for construction and servicing of sewerage and water. Mr. Curtis said this criteria is no problem. Mrs. Maher asked what is the size of the small lot in the N-F� corner. Mr. Curtis said 1.1 acres. It was asked if the lot was large enough for the uses of that zone and;be_able'to leave trees also. Mr. Curtis said the lot was small because of the cal de sac modifications. Chairman Tudhope asked if the trees would have to be removed. Mr. Curtis said not too many; there are not too many good trees and it would be mostly the smaller less desirable trees removed.. Commissioner Bailey said that in the memorandum from University officials it was suggested to pave the remaining 200' on the University road from National Life property to the west gate, while in use. 1JX'. Curtis said this has not been considered as he just received the letter. He said it was just a suggestion not a mandate. He said there is a good relationship with the University and feels there will be no.problem. Commissioner Marvin asked if the University agrees to abandoning the University road, will,. -the land:.bedeeded.:to..the.adjourning lots. Mr. Curtis replied yes. Chairman Tudhope asked if the changes will be put in the agreement with Fairview Motors. Mr. Curtis indicated changes will be in agreements. Commissioner Mary Barbara Maher asked what,l'uses.-the eastern-lots:_will be sold for. Mr. Ward said that the new zoning has R1 1500' in depth from Spear St. He said the land within the red lines on the .plan will be deeded to the City. Mr. lard eaid the Environmental -.Board desired the designation of sewer and water rights of way on lots ;;'17 and 18. Chairman Tudhope asked Mr. Curti" to describe tie area of Land to be preserved as a stream bed. ::He said' r:It drains a wide area from 190' to 2201,with the stream meandering. 'There is a 30' drop and then it - crosses under,Shelburne Rd. It is basically well treed, except an old farm road, and has hardwoods and softwoods. Chairman Tudhope asked if he would classify it as useable -.for development. Mr. Curtis said no,and that it was a gully. No road is anticipated to cross the stream. The Chairman asked what use was anticipated for lot #13. Mr. Curtis repliedahigh class commercial park would be ideal, such as office buildln,�s, and that it would be within the future zoning. Commissioner Maher asked if the land adjacent to Shelburne Rd. might be of use to the city for an access to the recreational area. Mr. Curtis said yes. Commissioner Marvin commented that Green Mt. Power who owns a protion of land next to Shelburne Rd. might move -'.their headquarters there in the future. and he wondered how there would be access to the open space once the land bordering Shelburne Rd. is developed. Xr. Szymanski said the responsibility of sidewalks is.that of each individual developer. Commissioner Maher asked if the sidewalks would go in the ?5' setback: :Mr. Szymanski said it would go in the 60' right of way. Commissioner Marvin asked how many homes could,be built on the eastern lots. Mr. Ward estimated about 30 homes. Commissioner iiarvin asked where the children would play. Mr. Curtis said in the green area provided along the stream area. Mr. Curtis the developer would also be required to provide a certain percentage for open space. It was mentioned that }nbov'e `a' -certain elevation, water would be 3. SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION Xz,ETING JANU'1RY 23, 1973 provided from Spear St, Mrs. Guilford said she recalled there were 7-8 stipulations were required by the Planning.Commission when National Life first submitted plans, and she asked if these requirements were being met, for example a possible school site. Commissioner Maher said the plan submitted then was different from the present plan in that it was highly residential at that time. Mrs. Bull, Chairman of the Natural Resources Committee, said she was concerned that the plan did not show access to the natural area to be deeded to the City. She said an easement on the north side would be desirable. Mr. Lawrence Leveillee said it should be stated how the adjacent properties will be liable for the natural area. Krs. Bull said property deeded to the City is the responsibility of the City. Mr. Curtis asked which side the sidewalks will be located. Mr. Szymanski said probably the south and east ;.sides. A Chairman Tudhope declared a brief recess, k,Uter the recess, Commissioner Marvin moved to accept the Subdivision Plan of National Life as presented tonight by Mr. Curtis, with the stipulation tnpt the Natural Resources Committee :-approve an `easem(:"I',, for- a t wig to be deeded.to the 01ty for the purpose of provi.din3 access to the public, natural area within.the Subdivision. Commissioner Maher su&,ested that the motion include an understanding that the Horticultural Rd. be closed. Mr. Curtis said that this can't be guaranteed at the moment, only Indicated according to the memo from University officials. Commissioner Bailey seconded the motion. Commissioner Marvin read the phrase from National Life stating that National Life or any transferees will not ask for curb cuts on Horticultural Rd, and that the City of South. Burlington will never be asked to make improvements on Horticultural Rd, Chairman Tudhope asked if the motion included landscapping plans. Mr. lard said there is a letter of intent dated January lo, 1973, and a Planting Plan dated January 20, 1973, which will be reduced and recorded. There were no objections to adding to the motion "refer to two maps, letter of intent. and memos from Mr. di -4gans, and the State Highway Dept. The motion was approved unanimously. V :LCO ,,ND NATURAL RZSOUROES DISCUSSION REGARDING �30UTE OF 115KV j NF, Chairman Tudhope asked Mrs. Bull if the Natural resources agreed with the modified Northern Route as outlined on the'map accompanying the petition to PSB, with the exception of that portion of the route passing through Farrell Park. Mrs. Bull said yes, and that the Committee opposed,;Only that1.p0rti0h'Tpassing through the Farrell Park, and that the Committee favored the line passing north of the park. Commissioner Bailey commented that the crucial area is only about 1 half a mile, not miles. Commissioner Mary Barbara Maher asked Mr. Calcagni, representing Velco, if Velco was locked in on the proposed route as shown on the map. Mr. Calcagni said he won't say they are locked in. He thought it was too small a modification compared with the total project. 'Mrs.,Maher asked how soon Velco would be prepared to settle this matter. Mr. Calcagni said that Mr. Terrance Boyle, tha consultant, should be involved. Commissioner Bailey moved that the Natural Resources Committeee meet with Mr. Terrance Boyle. Velco s landscape adviser, in order to resolve thepropbsed-mod1fied Northern route through Farrell Park, Commissioner Mary Barbara Maher seconded the. motion. 4. SOUTH BURLIiyGTO.'6 PLANNING COLD II66ION RESTING J.L.NL1U1Rf 23, 1973 Mr. Szymanski reminded the Commission -that the PSB still has to rule )on the petition. Commissioner Maher said that it was her understanding that aA single steel pole would be used to carry two circuits in the area of Hinesburg Rd. and Old Farm Rd. Mr. Calcagni said that the single pole would have to be 20-30' higher than the wooden H-style in order to carry two circuits,and that the. -A -frame - style of the.•single pole would mean. higher costs for. the.'line. - Mrs..1iaher asked if the existing right of way could be used with a single pole for the two circuits. Mr. Calcagni said yes, but an elaborate foundation would be needed. It was asked how much more land would be required for the proposed line. An additional 100' .:,.. Mr.:Tilley. said' an additional 100' would put ' 4o..,rJght_oX..way in.his.back yard. Chairman Tudhope asked if there was any further discussion. The motion was approved unanimously. Mr. Gordon Wright said he had some questions and comments. tie asked if the southern route would be deemed acceptable if the petition for the modified northern route were not signed by all parties. Chairman Tudhope said the City Attorney indicated the petition need only be signed by a majority of the parties. Mr. Wright asked what was the height difference between the H frame and the A frame. Mr. Calcagni said the average height of the existing H frame is 45-50' , and the average height of the A fr.:jue steel pole wouldbe 75-80'. Mr. Wright said he did not understand why the Natural Resources Committe originally favored the southern route, "d now is in favor of the modified northern route. Chairman Tudhope said tae )Committee originally favored the southern route only because the northern route at that time passed through the middle of Farrell Park. The northern route has since been modified to follow an existing line part of the way and it is aiso'hoped that Velco will agree to bypass Farrell Park to the north. Mr. Wright commented that in letters dated July 21, 1972, to Airport Manager, Air North and Air National Guard, he expressed concern that power.lines along the northern route would pose_hazards-:to=aircraftt where the line would be in the approach path of aircraftkto the airport.. He also commented that he did not believe it was consistent with new zoning to locate lines in areas which will be highly developed. Mr. Sims was concerned that the northern route would mean the line would cross the interstate in two places making an eyesore. It was pointed out that the crossing on the Interstate would follow an existing line. Mrs. Guilford,a party to the petition, said that'the.;.petition was a vague document, and that she wanted a clarification as to what the agreement meant. Mr. Robert Schell reitera�4 EgUTAH-t��4, eBPethe northern route, ' and waq & to know what arguments were ava a e o the puolic. Chairman Tudhope ais item has been on the agenda many times, and he explained the reason why the southern route is less favorable to the City is because part of the southern route would follo;r: Lake.:.Ghamplain where there would be bare routing in places. Mrs.Maher agreed with persons attending the meeting that residents )affected by the northern route were not zpecifically notified after PSB had chosen the southern route. She felt persons affected by policy should be notified 'hut diAn't know how this could be done in every case. Mr. Tilley wanted to know what would happen if additional land Is not negotiated. It was said higher poles might have to be used. -'OUTil 3Lh0ANuTON !'lANNIN,.i COItIi-116;ION r1:,ia' ING JANUIO(f 25. 19( Chairman Tudhope asked that the Commission move on to the next item. PIZZAGALLI CONSTRUCTION ON CORXIra OF KENNEDY A.ND HIN333URG Ivir.'James Pizzagalli said that during the warning period of impending zoning all applications for building permits have to be approved by the City Council with an advisory opinion from the Planning Commission. Mr. Pizzagalli briefed the Commission on the background of the application of the building permit. He said the lot had originally been sold to Phillips, and that 3 curb cuts had been approved. Phillips has been discontinued and taken over by a local chain which dispenses gas. He said this plan is only for a small outlet rather than a large station as originally planned. He said the new'plan calls for only two instead of three curb cuts. The architecture will tie in with existing architecture on Kennedy Dr, with brick facing and laminated beams. George Brady is the landscapper. Mr. Pizzagalli said trees in the back of the property and some in.the front will be saved as it is a heavily wooded lot. There will be some fill near the facility. The pump islands on either side of the ouilding will have planters. Commissioner Mary Barbara Maher said she walked the lot and noticed that the exit onto Kennedy Dr. is located opposite an island on Kennedy Dr. She asked Mr. Szymanski to comment on the possibility of a traffic hazard. Mr. Szymanski said it�.could be a-problem:to allold:an::exit, Opposite an island, and he saiu the council originally approved three exits with the condition that if a hazard was created, the exit would be closed. Mr. Pizzagalli said the issue of curb cuts was not before the Commission. Commissioner Marvin said that if it is known to be a hazard, then could the entrance be only on Hinesburg Rd, lir. Pizzagalli said he did not believe it had been established it was a hazard. He said he didn't think it would be acceptable to the tenants. Commissioner Maher said the'lot has two drainageways that would require an enormous amount of fill in order to locate the building as planned. Mr. Pizzagalli said there was 48' right of way and a culvert, which would drain toward the back of the property. Mrs. Maher asked if there was a final landscapping plan that was detailed and listed the:plantings. . , Commissioner Maher moved to recommend to the City Council approval with the stipulation that should the entrance on Kennedy Dr.- prove to be a hazard the City will have.the option to close the entrance, and that a lands cappin:_ plan In detail be approved by the -'Planning- Commission. Commissioner Bailey seconded the motion, 1virs. Maher asked lair. Szymanski if there was anything else to ask in order for the City to protect itself. Mr. Szymanski said there should be escrow for landscapping, and all necessary bonds should be posted with the City Manager. Commissioner Marvin asked if a feeder lane on Kennedy Dr* would be a possibility. Mr. Szymanski said a feeder lane would be a hazard for pedertrians, especially with apartment projects nearby. Tfie motion was approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P. X. ebrultry 0 , 19r/3 Pizzagalli "onstructi: n Co. Joy Drive "'�outfl Hurl toll 0�Llol t,Atenti,,)n: "Ir. Ja!-v,s Pizzagalli Gentlernen rub te ct i Poi,,,er Petroleum, proposed gasoline, station, Kennedy 11.)rive aw? llinc,3burg '!',oad. 'Pr:, advis—d the Seuth Purlington City ':.7uncIl has approved th�� request of Power Petroleum for a zoning permit. , a -4 241 V.S.A., with. t1he .-s pr,-)iridod ror under �_I��ctJon 1+4113, following stipulitions: '7� a). that consjidera'on to com-ply to the proposed 75 Foot set -back be worked out with the City Manager, b). Viat should the Kennedy Drive en'rance prove to be Ia hazard, the City will have the option to close it, and c). that a. deailedlandscaping pl,.;,- be submitted for Plannin,4, Con -mission approval. permit will be issued upon your request. Very truly , Frederick G. Flais Chairman City Council FC.Plj 40� PIZZAGALLI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY JOY DRIVE/SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 802/658-4100 January 12, 1973 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Dick: As we discussed this morning, we have been approached by Power Petroleum, Inc. concerning the possibility of developing a service station site at the intersection of Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive in South Burlington. Prior to involving ourselves in any such project, we wanted to ascertain the status of zoning and permits for the project, and it was for that reason that I met with you. You stated at our meeting that, unless the construction was in accordance with the building permit presently in existence for the property, application would have to be made to the Planning Commission for approval of the project, and, in any event, you indicated that the City Attorney had advised you that, in accor- dance with the provisions of 24 VSA 4443(c) no permit could be issued on the property without the approval of the City Council since a new zoning ordinance for South Burlington has apparently been duly warned. I indicated that, on the basis of a quick review of the law and regulations, it was our opinion that the construction of a service station on the parcel did not come within the definition of subdivision contained in Section 102 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations and that, therefore, Planning Commission approval was not necessary. We acknowledge, of course, that the lot in question is a part of the Kennedy Plaza subdivision, but approval for this subdivision was granted some time ago. Mr. Richard Ward -2- January 12, 1973 As for the prohibition against issuance of a permit, I indicated that I felt that 24 VSA 4443(c) applied only to an amendment of By-laws adopted under Chapter 91 and not to the enactment of a complete new ordinance designed to replace an ordinance enacted under prior enabling legislation. As agreed, I am submitting the matter to you in writing so that you may request a legal opinion from the City Attorney. ' cerely uyrs, Si I Q I ames Pizzagal i Treasurer JP:sc cc J. T. Ewing, Esquire Mr. T. J. Marx POWER PETROLEUM INC. 6 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05401 January 17, 1973 City Council City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Gentlemen: Pursuant to the provisions of 24 VSA 4443(c), consent is hereby sought for the issuance of a building permit for the con- struction of a gasoline station at the intersection of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road in accordance with plans being filed with the Zoning Administrator of the City of South Burlington. This application is made without prejudice to any rights available to us arising out of our claim, as previously filed with the Zoning Administrator, that application to you under 24 VSA 4443(c) may not be required. Respectfully submitted, POWER PETROLE"C. i Y T. J.,Marx, President' TJM:sc cc John T. Ewing, Esquire .Ao 1-� 7 !yy/?/� a/oz / .S lial o �s 4�7 "-) ,-7/0��e7".1 ,o.e • 6 Sei i��a-e MOBIL OIL CORP. KENNEDY DR., HINESBURG RD. Section 19.00 Non -conforming uses and structure. Area zoned R-7 District existing use non -conforming Proposed: remove existing structure (1876 sq. ft.) and replace with a 34' x 54' (1836 sq. ft.). Proposed use two bay service station and variety store. F.M.V. (City records) building $37,136 land $53,764 total $90,000. Estimated cost of new building $100,000. Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements minimum set back - 50 feet proposed set back - 35 feet. Proposed 24'x 77' pump island canopy. Buffer required from commercial to residential uses -minimum 65 feet - proposed 40 feet. SITE PLAN r / t / r � / r l \ t o / 1 I rRSLS t0 R(IAA/N /.•.I T/V/� AR �A/ r � i � 1 /70.39' AW M/ r /� / "��--c- ,NSrACL NA Iv `•' O� � �c`j, s � , a'a"Co law/A- rJ 6Q 10 �. v 4AND L e-APb A{ON ALT S/GL IYALK \ � I I t �C. E. C EXrS t/Nb LuRD GdT7 � _8 O_Y 9 O ' 2 � 1 1<D1AAJ j t I \ Ix reXtfra __.._ sw IV i / /n f.t S T R A 4 L I V 01A EA./ T -tF' p -_1 6 MAt- i/,LS I ..FLOOR PLAN 1/4of = 1-0ff V3p A F�\ June 26, 1984 Attorney Ronald Schmucker 1480 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Kennedy Drive Mobile Dear Ron: Be advised that the Zoning Board of Adjustment has granted your request for a zoning variance. The Board stipulated that: (a) operating hours be from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., (b) that the snack area be confined to 400 square feet as shown on the plan of record, (c) that no alcoholic beverages be sold from this location at any time. Your proposal is subject to site plan review by the Planning Commission, contact the City Planner for scheduling. Formal findings by the Board will be forwarded to you at a later date. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg June 21, 1984 TO THE ZONING BOARD, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Dear Board Members: We, the undersigned members of the Manor Woods Association, do hereby object to the granting of the variance requested concerning the gas station located at the corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road, for the following reasons: The proposed building will have two garage bays facing Building 2 of Manor Woods; because of fumes caused thereby and additional noise caused as a result of the entrance to said proposed bays. We have four owners with breathing problems, some quite severe, whose bedrooms face the proposed bays. Some of these owners/residents have had lengthy and very expensive hospital stays because of their breathing deficiencies. We object to removal of any trees or shrubbery now near our dividing line, which presently obscures the existing gas station building. We object to having beer sold at the gas station, thereby causing more traffic during the hours from 6:00 a.m. to 12 midnight. We also desire a ten -foot -high cyclone fence the length of the property line. We believe that if the proposed variance is granted, it will depreciate the values of our condominiums. We trust you will act favorably to our desire. Respectfully submitted, MANOR WOODS ASSOCIATION June 21, 1984 Manor Woods Association members signing letter to South Burlington Zoning Board protesting proposed granting of variance to Mobil Oil Corporation for changes to its gas station at corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road: NAME TTNTrP NTTMRFR r�Wei June 21, 1984 Manor Woods Association members signing letter to South Burlington Zoning Board protesting proposed granting of variance to Mobil Oil Corporation for changes to its gas station at corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road: NAME UNIT NUMBER ` ►�► ;v� ICI k�o June 21, 1984 Manor Woods Association members signing letter to South Burlington Zoning Board protesting proposed granting of variance to Mobil Oil Corporation for changes to its gas station at corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road: NAME UNIT NUMBER June 21, 1984 TO THE ZONING BOARD, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Dear Board Members: We, the undersigned members of the Manor Woods Association, do hereby object to the granting of the variance requested concerning the gas station located at the corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road, for the following reasons: The proposed building will have two garage bays facing Building 2 of Manor Woods; because of fumes caused thereby and additional noise caused as a result of the entrance to said proposed bays. We have four owners with breathing problems, some quite severe, whose bedrooms face the proposed bays. Some of these owners/residents have had lengthy and very expensive hospital stays because of their breathing deficiencies. We object to removal of any trees or shrubbery now near our dividing line, which presently obscures the existing gas station building. We object to having beer sold at the gas station, thereby causing more traffic during the hours from 6:00 a.m. to 12 midnight. We also desire a ten -foot -high cyclone fence the length of the property line. We believe that if the proposed variance is granted, it will depreciate the values of our condominiums. We trust you will act favorably to our desire. Respectfully submitted, MANOR WOODS ASSOCIATION June 21, 1984 Manor Woods Association members signing letter to South Burlington Zoning Board protesting proposed granting of variance to Mobil Oil Corporation for changes to its gas station at corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road: R I r UNIT NUMBER NEW HOME OF DIAL (802) 862-1110 540 A L L I N G Companies, 9 COMMERCE STREET, WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 REAL ESTATE SALES, DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, LEASING, INVESTMENTS, REG. SEC. INVESTMENT ADVISOR :ay 30, 1984 Ronald C. Schmucker, Esq. 1480 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont Dear Ron: Please be advised that we have reviewed Mobil Oil plan number 05-154 dated April 4, 1984 proposing changes to the Kennedy Drive at Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vt. property. This plan has our approval. Please use this letter to serve notice as such. Respectfully, Beatrice P. Alling Trust Beatrice P. Alling, Trustee City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 863-2882 Attorney Ronald Schmucker 1480 Williston Rd. . So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Ron: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-2486 June 11, 1984 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Office Conference Room, 575 Dorset St. on Monday, June 25, 1984 at 5:00 p.m. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this hearing. Very truly Richard Ward Zoning Administrator S Y ob 13 �' y p m a6 Ep 4 •t £ O 1� N � •� pp�$ ».L' ° •S »r �Y .� ! � '�.Y w r r�� O C n O. :�'� ♦ � � Y m lie O W ppbbQQ Int 1p ;Ill ��$ Y� �€ �€ * .0 �'� uY�.i ux i�.F �K rf1 �... �i�� •� uu. Y� E 6._.N it .E �.-�.Y O O._. u J i�► C r u�� NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARDD) OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant IM 6M Name, address of property owner UW IS T61 1�) l,)i Property location and description !'/, 'qa( 1'yV 4�al�d"/ J /? , / / 116 I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree teignature y the heari fee of $30.0//0 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. �J�6 y d/ COy�✓` /` 0 Hearing Date Qppellant �~ v ----------------------------Do-not-write-below-this-line ----------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on , A67,/98 at 5-o--11 (day of w k) (month and date) time to consider the following: Appeal o f " ?'Y ��-'e- 0& i seeking afrom Section e e: ,C •�� a-s Z,� + Lam',,,f� u s h w/ �• O �' � ^��' ''F_+ �bf the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to eel y° l.' re � J ..-�-�..�� -.� �-e-- •/�-�'/ .,.�-•lam► i�� SOUTH BURLINGTON IONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Our Iinglon Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 2e V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hewing of the South Burlington Municipal Offices. Conference Room, 575...Dofsef Street, South Burlington, Vermoint on Monday, May 2k, 19A, at SAID P.M, to con- sider the following: :t. C I. Appeal of Dam A)ItfT�-Mobil Oil Corporation seeking a ywl- once, ham Sectlon.19A0, Non -Con. (arming uses and Hruclures, Sec- llon 11.00 Dlmemlonol require- ments of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for per- mission to remove existing bulld- Ing and reoloce with a two bay 34' x 54' Wvice station and variety stare, also construct a 24' x 93' canopy to within thirty (20) feel of the required set back, proposed building will have a butter of thirty-four (21) feet, at Kennedy Drive Mobil, located at Kennedy Drive and Hlnesburg Road. 2. Appeal of Thomos H. Borry seeking a variance, from Section 9.10, Permitted uses and Section 19.652 Multiple Uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for permission to overate a print. Ing shop (12'x24') from a Poroge In conjunctlon with a single family dwelling, at 1397 Airport Drive. 2. Appeal of Orlon and Ann McMann seeklno a varlonce, from Section 11.00, Dimensional re- oulremerds of the South Burling- ton RegrAatiom. Request Is for permission to construct a 91x22' ocid"lon to onexisting garage to within four and one halt (IVY) feet of the northerly side yard, at 32 Mills Avenue. 4. Appeal of Larry Hwbough seek- Ing a variance, from Section 19.1S2, Multiple uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for permission to operate a flea market on a iemoorory basis in conlunctlon with a restaurant d.b.a. Arthur Treocher's of e0e Shelburne Rood. Richard Word, Zoning Administrative Officer May 7, 1963 MOBIL OIL CORPORATION Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road Area zoned R-7 District Section 19.00 Non -conforming uses and structure - use prohibited Proposed: remove existing building 1876 square feet and replace with 34'x54' (1836 square feet) - use service station two bays and variety store similar to other station conversion. F.M.V. (City records) building $37,136 land $53,764 - total $90,000 Estimated cost of new building $100,000 Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements Minimum set -back - 50 feet proposed set -back - 30 feet — 3� Proposed 24'x83' canopy Buffer required from commercial to residential uses 65 feet - setback to property line 34 feet V- 7Self Serves 1• a s II.v�Ao►-car+ 18069 aaa� Tr 29 *Ne 1 'ice } i j: tom►. ,a:. x lh- � ♦ t 4 t ae SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE n accordance with the South Bur - Iington Zonlnu Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a publlc hearing of the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, -575 _. Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermoht on Monday, May 23, 1963, of 5:00 P.M. to con- sider the following: .'sr:� I. Appeal of DOM Allti�p,.-Mobil Oil Corporation seeking a earl- once, from Section.19.00, Non -con- forming uses Grid structures, Sec - lion 10.00 Dimensional require- ments of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for per- mission to remove existing build. Ing and replace with a two bay 34' x 54' service station and variety store, also construct a 21' x 83' canopy to within thirty (30) feet of the required set back, proposed building will have a buffer of thlrty4Our (34) feet, at Kennedy Drive Mobil, located of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Rood. 2. Appeal of Thomas H. Barry seeking a variance, from Section 9.10, Permitted uses and Section 19.652 Multiple Uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for permission to operate a print. Ing shop (12'x24') from a garage In conjunction with a single family dwelling, of 1367 Airport Drive. J. Appeal of Brian and Ann McMam seeking a variance, from ' Section 111.00,. Dimensional re- quirements Of the South Burling- ton Regulations. Request Is for permission to construct a 9-x22' addition to on existing garage to within four and one half (416) feet Of fie northerly side yard, of 33 Mills Avenue. 4. Appeal of Larry HGrbOugh seek- ing a vorlonce, from Section 19.652, Multiple uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for permission to operate a flea market on a temporary basis In conlunction with a restaurant d.b.a. Arthur Treocher's at 408 Shelburne Road. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer May 7, 1993 PERRY & SCHMUCKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1480 WILLISTON ROAD P. O. BOX 2323 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 ROBERT J. PERRY RONALD C. SCHMUCKER July 18, 1983 Mr. David Spitz Mr. Richard Ward Planning & Zoning Department City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Mobil Oil Corporation Gentlemen: TELEPHONE 863-4558 AREA CODE 802 I called Mr. Preedom of Mobil today to determine the feasibility of Mobil being able to prepare its work in time for a July 25, 1983 hearing. Mr. Preedom indicated that because of the heart attack of one of the engineering personnel, it would not be able to comply. Because of the advice of Mr. Preedom and because of the confirmation of that advice by Mobil, I simply request that South Burlington may treat the application which was previously submitted as withdrawn so as to permit us to apply anew when the paperwork has been done. As you know, the project is being redesigned to meet as much as possible the expressed wishes and needs of the condominium association, and therefore we expect when the plan is resubmitted it to be objectively tolerable to all. Thank you for your patience. Cordially, G1il Ctl� C . Jchrrlu L1Le.i I Ronald C. Schmucker RCS/las cc: Mr. Russell Preedom George Agel, Esq. PERRY & SCHMUCKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1480 WILLISTON ROAD P. 0. BOX 2323 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT OS402 ROBERT J. PERRY RONALD C. SCHMUCKER June 13, 1983 Mr. David Spitz Mr. Richard Ward Planning & Zoning Department City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Mobil Oil Corporation Gentlemen: TELEPHONE 883-4SS8 AREA CODE 802 RE��v ER Mp,1Ao�RURL p�tON V11 go. B Please be advised that I have talked with Mr. Russell Preedom of Mobil Oil Corporation this morning and learned that Mobil will not be ready to present its proposal at the June 27 meeting. Mobil is at this time attempting internally to adjust their plans to deal with the concerns of the condominium association and those concerns which I have pointed out to them are of interest to you gentlemen. As you may know, a redesign of a station cannot be accomplished without considerable engineering and other approvals within the company. I am sending a copy of this letter to George Agel, Esquire, as I believe attorney for the condominium association, so that he may understand nothing will happen on June 27th. Please call me o at any specific time ready to go forward. RCS/las cc: George Agel, Esq. r write to me if I need to get back with you other than just to notify you when I am Cordia ly, Ch Ronald k,�Schmucker GEORGE L. AGEL ATTORNEY AT LAW 192 COLLEGE ST. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 864-51 35 June 10, 1983 South Burlington Zoning Board c/o R. Ward, Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Gentlemen: I am writing this letter for your records, in regard to petition for variance in regard of appeal of DalVA Alling, Mobil Oil Corporation, seeking a variance concerning the service station at the corner of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road in South Burlington, Vermont, and on behalf of Manor Woods Association, we do not want it to go by default, which under the law, would allow petitioners request to be granted if no action was taken by the Board regarding this matter,-4w � ' �v '' Thanking you for filing this letter in the matter, I am Respect W l.y yours, -,"4 /1� George L. Agel, AttoZ kac MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Zoning Board toy 0-11-5 From: South Burlington Planning Commission Re: Next Agenda Date: 5/11/83 The Planning Commission wished to express concerns with two applications that will be coming before you at your next meeting: (1) the variety store portion of the Kennedy Drive Mobil application, and (2) the flea market at Arthur Treacher's. In both cases they are concerned with the potential for increased and possibly overburdened use of the properties in question. I wish to point out that traffic aspects of each application will have to be administratively reviewed, and a determination will be made as to whether either application is subject to review by the Planning Commission under traffic criteria. PERRY & SCHMUCKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1480 WILLISTON ROAD P. O. BOX 2323 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT OS402 ROBERT J. PERRY RONALO C.SCHMUCKER May 18, 1983 ,fir. David Spitz ---,"Mr. Richard Ward Planning & Zoning Department City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Mobil Oil Corporation Gentlemen: TELEPHONE 863-4558 AREA CODE 802 On behalf of Mobil Oil Corporation, I have been asked to continue the hearing scheduled for the 23rd and 24th of May on Mobil's application until the month of June. I have met with the adjacent homeowners association in an effort to learn of their concerns and to perhaps effect a compromise, and this will take time. .1 in act suggested the delay. Cord' 11 , i Ronal. Schmucker cc: Mr. Russ Preedom ZW' k, It_�Gf/1�1 AA -! �X � 4'�' ,,� 30 / I 0 City of South Burlington ' 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 863-2882 May 10, 1983. Mobil Oil Corporation 19 Austin Road Albany, New York 12205 Re: Kennedy Drive Mobil Dear Madame or Sir: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-2486 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, May 23, 1983 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg cc: Attorney Ronald Schmucker NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT , Name,.addreas and telephone # of applicant 0(4 OM Name, address of ,,.._ r property owner Property location and description 1�� ir `��(/� AW(e 4 J . food G. r c, "(o d / ri I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal adve tisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to ay the he ri g ;f�e of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. d C Hearing Date SL2nature ellant Do not write below this line -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public" hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on , �',. , at (day of week month and dateT time to consider the following: Appeal of? ;" ,n seeking a from Section/ D U „�.,., of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to } -74 r 51 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 �.. •�' TEL. 863-2891 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER WILLIAM 1. SZYMANSKI May 19, 1983 Chairman Everett Reed, Chairman South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment Dear Everett: The South Burlington City Council, at their meeting on May 16, 1983, reviewed the ZBA Agenda for May 23, 1983 and unanimously voiced their opposition to the appeal of Dana Alling, Mobil Oil Corporation request for non -conforming use and set -back variance. The Council feels that granting these variances is encour- aging and intensifying spot zoning, to which they are opposed. I also sense that if the variety store request is granted and a liquor license is requested that the Council, acting as the Liquor Control Board, may have difficulty granting such a license, however I may emphasize that this was not discussed by the Council and is only my opinion. Very trul yo rs, William J. Szymanski City Manager WJS/b cc: City Council Zoning Administrative Officer Richard Ward ,SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE The South Burlington Zoning Boor.i of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington High School, Cafeteria 11, Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Wednesday, May 20, 1970 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Appeal of San Remo Realty Corp., from the decision of the Zoning Administrative Officer disapproving curb cuts, Section 8.67 (Vehicle entrance requirements), South Burlington Zoning Ordinance, on Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Albert 1. Reyr,olds, Chairman CITY LEGATI L NOCE OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Pvrsuont to the provisions of 24 V.S.A., Section 4443, The South Bur. lington City Coµncii wil'I ho.'d a Pub, lic hearinq at toe City Office Build - Room, Conference Room, 1775 Wil- liston Road, South Burtington, Wer_ mont on Monday, February s, 1973 at 7:30 p.m. to consider the app-iicaa- t:an for a zoning permit from Pow. ar Petra:'eum, Inc. Thomas J. Marx, President, of SouTh Burling tan, Vermont for construction of a gasoline station on a parcel of land located at the Infe rseciion of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road, Plans cre on IN, In the office of the Zoning Adm'indstrative Officer. Zoning Adm'nistRraeic ardWord Of Iced City of South Burlington Jan. 20, 1973