Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CU-10-07 - Supplemental - 0101 Holmes Road
Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan •••:•:•:•••• - y y� �.�,•�-.•-.• PPE ENGINEER: Existing Conditions - The existing conditions at the site generally includes a lack of •. • • • N ` �• �_...__, r ` �� 14, S - subcanopy vegetation due to the lack of light reaching the ground. Mature hemlocks .I. y —V located along along the south embankment cut off light all year round. The presence of these - " - .... - A -.................. trees have also suppressed any significant vegetative cover on the ground along the top .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' • GENERATION \L \ NATURAL portions and slopes of the embankment area. _ E ` ,•�� ` A A Stormwater from Holmes Road and the residential use flows northwesterly to the top 4t -•• • • • OAD L `� It,Y \ . ` CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. and down the embankment slopes down to the wetland below. - ,Z fOMANSpEID HEN'WIF SOURfBURUNOTON, IT OHM CD LO e024e6= FM Ws-W2M aanr Basis of Design -The proposed riparian corridor restoration plan for the Easton property p C I �) - - - _ y y • `••`• �� � utilizes the design recommendations of the United States Department of Agricufture •PLR•( (�-tiA.CYN.'. R' - \ `Y `Y \Y \I' \Y \Y \V \I/ \y \L \11 coermaer aoov - au ercan uarnvea Natural Resources Conservation Service. -•,• •.••• •-•. •,•,•••••, •,•,•••,• DMWN This restoration plan focuses on three primary goals. --� -.'.'-'-' -'.'- •T.•.� \� j0% y I y y ACL 1. Stormwater filterin9 :-•�"l0•:•:::::-:•:•::: -:-.-:':•'•:•:•�"•.-:•.•.. - _ _ ASH 8 ASH 8" ASH 16' c�c� 2. Wildlife Habitat creation .:..,! ........... _ -�.; .. . _ \ �� \ �y y ,y �y �y �y t y y y 3. Site Stabilization - -'r• •- '- ,'{2Q- \) ASH 8" 1 DSM ✓%- Secondary benefits of the proposed restoration program Include: restoration of riparian • • •� \I :•.- _ \' y/ pi ant communities, providing a source of detritus and large woody debris and increasing R�r[3E;��•;•, •. \ 'k � 2�QL y DSM carbon storage. '-•` •• F$E8 OWNERS: Wetland Augmnetation - Due to the lack of sunlight there is little if any vegetation with -�.. \- •-'-'-•- _ •'• i '\� W \1' y \ y \y \Y \Y any significant wildlife benefit. There is no significant cover or feed available. The = ::. ::.ls• �:::. removal of the hemlocks from the south embankment will open this area up to enable : "` t -, • \j • . • •}1 �'-6 - • \":•. • '�• •• • s' .1. \ � A S H �y y more beneficial wetland species to be introduced or to regenerate within the is area. -_�' • •j _ ..�Q-"• • •`) EWPLI THOMAS R. & The proposed planting plan provides the momentum to restore vegetation favorable for. •%` '- • •.,,� •• �!-r:' •:iJ�Nia}:-:-: `•:•,�_ - • ('. , • \ _ _ wildlife cover and feed.. Natural regeneration from seeds distributed from introduce •"• y _ _ •�•' • _ '-' �•- • - •`• ti • IL E yKATHLEEN H. .plantings and those further described below in the Zone 1 and 2 management areas will � �.::.'..:.'�.' � + + ':�'-' • � lead to a more vibrant and diversified community. _ $ • - + • • + + + + ti---_ •• •• : W ! - �A T N Following the guidelines of the NRCS, a three zone system in the non we0and area was � � + \ �Y \V' .. �'Jr.� •-'-:� :�••'?Y. \Y \L �L SH +L �L developed. -' _ _ - �-•-'- - + + + + + �RAMf': � 1• � • �. , • . Management Zone 1 - this Is located immediately adjacent to the wetland itself and � �, - •-�jZE,T; , ` � + + ;„fie . � � • ��• � -/ i.r:i•:r :•:.:.:. :'l.'. '.' ...� . ' represents the transition from facultative wetlands atlas to facultative upland species. - •---•',;•=• •' • r •' y' - This zone was split u into an eastern portion closest to the retained hemlock trees + + `' •� .:, . . . . . \I: . . : .r'.. ` ` M yll w'iti. P P Po ' � significant in and western Rion which will •" ' :L "• E' 1�$.� III - - • j ROJEC . winch will continue to experience shg ca t shading a portion + + + � � + .. ^ . T ......�„�•. •-. i .i.;�;,.� _ P T' provide a new subcanopy habitat. + ,� -•E + + _ _ ' •. t R j r +�+�+++ �L3FR .... Plantings in this area are careful) chosen to provide improved wildlife habitat white also ... • - �(. recognizing the seasonal saturation of the soils at the base of the embankment due to s \ - • • � - � � - - •r � `' � • � • groundwater seeps. + + + + �(�+ j +, + L _ .. . � ,��-:� �. � y �.• EASTON PROPERTY --� - Between the shrub and tree plantings, a mixture of warm and cool season grasses, -,•, •,-, - + + + + / + + + + + _ ` ;; :; IT PLAN /1 further modified to achieve the recommended seeding rates and types for the binding of , ••• • •;•;-; • - • '""''-' ^ i - T • •'."" SITE N the slopes (set forth by the State of Vermont Erosion Control Manual) was chosen to .`.-.'.-.•.-.'.':':'.'.' _ + + + + + + + + ,fijA c�(j + - - - - / / - provide initial cover. These grasses provide important cover and browse material for wildlife in support of the goals of augmenting the otherwise existinghomogenous / + + + + ` _ _ F.: 1 / environmental +D W + + + ,i j ' •� •' • -_ - ; _ _ _ + 1)�` �k� J 101 HOLMES ROAD + + a.: _ �. .� �SOUTH B RLIN T N In order to provide diversity and to avoid wholesale loss of cover, a mixture of at least + + + + + - � y i- - „'. � .: - - - - V G O Zoe (5) different species is employed in each management zone. •; •; •; ' + + + + - _ ! '•'• • •-�- - �.: iT1:�' •' VERMONT Base don the NRCS recommendations, Shrub community plantings were placed on •••'."�••• ••y.-- ' •C 1 +- 10-foot to 12-foot spacing while the tree community areas are to be planted with 12-foot • •TiCI�}�� `7•: •:-:- -•"-- - + + +.• to 15-foot spacings. WALLrw.:.:.:.:':' •' + + - - •�--1.. c - - 1 1-cJ — Management Zone 2 - This represents the upland portion of the riparian corridor. This -t 7!"a ' - f " ' - • - - -•- - •- _ _ - - - - zone was also broken u into eastern and wester portions with the eastern portion being + + . . •�--•� P .. i III R _ - subject to shade and partial sun conditions while the western portion would be subject/� •. '.'.'.'. ^', : - L sun and partial sun conditions. The plantings chosen for this area took into account the ep�i' / ( ) + ++ + + -1 •,t: •: •, •, •, - - dryer soil conditions and offered high to very high wildlife habitat value due to a ON/ / I Ea 'y:'{,�.'.'. •.'.'. ... combination of cover and feed opportunities in addition to the sun light availability.. I 1 ¢i ASH 1 Q I •' • • •••' • •""LAAr WIDE I tRyy ., .::.::::::::::: Plant materials such as elderberry and dogwoods were chosen to limit the / � ��` / ••.:�.:,:.:,:.:.I ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: y encroachment of invasive species during initial grow -in of this area. / S ,• - •i �...;. { / .. �y y Similar to Zone 1, this management area will also benefit from the seeding of the site I _ _ _ _ •( -•- i P with the wildlife and soil stabilization grasses between the proposed shrub and tree I -' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ;-�•;• j •; - :;:�, / • •q.• • • -0 H G BEAM 0 ,�1 ��® Management Zone 3- This zone represents the primary means of filtering runoff from / - 'j.'- -:'.':'.-.'•' COTTON'w 1) the residential use and transportation corridor. The grass types chosen Pot this zone / %�.'- - _ / f located along the top of the embankment provide both nutrient uptake as well as habitat / .:�-_. _'-'_- / ' 22•� 1 // `®A benefits through improved cover characteristics. This area is not to be mowed and is \ /-�• - ' ' " - ' _ ,i protected with a spilt rail fence to keep residential uses from creeping into the riparian \ / X. " ' ' ' •:•, •' •' j corridor area. \ \ // / _ a' 1• - / These grasses are similar to those used in Zones 1 and 2 except that the additional \ _ // • _6." •n.L I1rl LOCK , • , • , • , application of Switchgrass and Love grass has been cut back where steep slopes are ZONES- 1-3 SLOPE SEEDING - - - - - - - - - - not present. SEED MIX RATE p ( \ H 141 L' Q K { / LEGEND ,'.'. .'.' % DA. a 1., ..... .. ..... BIG BLUESTREAM 6 Ibs/Ac • _ - ' _ ' ' - - - - - i •:•(•:•:•:.':':•:•:":':'. mac,,..-.-.-.• � - _ - - . INDIANGRASS 6 Ibs Ac / • • • ."" / ... ..... .. a„ / i. - _- 338— PROPOSED CONTOUR DEERTONGUE 6 Ibs/Ac / •'•'•'- �ti- ' ' ' - - • • - _ ,SWITCHGRASS 8 Ibs/Ac , ..�.....r...' I- - - <. - -- APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE i • - • - ' • • 'SAND LOUEGRASS 4 Ib Ac C!\-- '•'-' . . . . . . . —- SEWER MANHOLE 30 Ibs/Ac .� O :• ` •.. j�: �'•.l�!'.J{ •/�� i� HYDRANT ZONE$-3,NON-SLOPE SEEDING - - _ ------ - SEED MIX RATE _ - — -- .................. I i� ® SHUT-OFF � i ----'� �� i BIG BLUESTREAM-6-ibs/Ac A X. :.:. :. .:.:.1•:::::':::.........:r ...:........................:.. woe/°T— �p POWER POLE INDIANGRASS 6 Ibs/Ac ]' }'•' ' ' DEERTONGUE 6 Ibs/Ac a- :.h. : �� � _- ES ----OAD\ a DECIDUOUS TREES TO BE RETAINED ` --- /�.,, ••"••• s • / I -'�- SWITC----- 4 Ibs Ac / / --- - 30 Ibs/Ac .. ,�, �a � O CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE RETAINED - '' _- - -- ' �/ -- {` \ ZONES 4 LAWN SEEDING�¢ - �; ___-_-- vgD EXIST. FENCE SEED MIX RATE --------_-- - LAN -� LANDSCAPING WETLAND DELINEATION CREEPING RED FESCUE 15 Ibs/Ac c p _-,. ----- \P PERRENIAL RYE GRASS 20 Ibs/Ac —• STREAM CENTERLINE ) 1 - .- ' _�ommon ittRUName Sclensnc Name NUMlIR `tla TypE ypNEIW6HT WILDLIFE REDTOPKY BLUEGRASS 10 Ibs Ac / 1 a r ;�, i tc ) ( I TOLERANCE VALUE SUN � _ r. 1� 5. " + 81 S.N_Berry, _Davey Amelanchier rborea -.. 1 C S Ballad Root 1 a 2 Lae High S NPsrthal... � 47 Ibs Ac 5� �, sz ,sa dce6 swamp Amelanchf denai: 2 9 e Ballad RaU tart lcx HI Sun/Puhel ZONE 1-WETLAND/UPLAND TRANSITION / ro'" its .. - ._. _{ _ erry, . , .. • ... • . • • a:'he �" h r /'� y 83 Dogwood Rado_sia_r C us see 3 _...g 9 Balled Root 1 Law - High P ri-W _ BANK STABILITY, DETRITUS, RETAIN NUTRIENTS GAVI P 21 - :(' ' 84 Elderberry S bucus adenss 9 6' S Balled Root 1 Modersts High Sun s y , , y S5 Haz hut, Baaked Cxyl s co to 6 6' B Bailed Root 1 cr2 Moderate High Sim/Pmtial DL•ra Dn-rnuc NU1®aft ZONE 2-UPLAND SLOPE PLANTINGS _ - - - t -- w' ,a _ -- """'""' SLOPE STABILITY, FILTER RUNOFF, SOFT EDGE TRANSITION I I+ y,. r' 98 Odgxaal, clay c e n Belled _Rea or _ rModerate_ saNPm �i FEB., 010 .... ....... .... osa 5 6' 8 Filth 2 ZONE 3-GRASS/HERBAREOUS FILTER STRIP. ' , -.� x GRAPHIC SCALE �. 1-- �� � � . _. z. a . - s— v`( Jl 1 SLOW AND FILTER RUNOFF I i »,i,;;/' �] Tt Ma Ale, Red Acx mMum 1 V. 6' Sailed Root t ...r Lev High PenW/Shad_ei �- A -.-.•.•.•.•.•.•.• ONE 4 -MAINTAIN LAWN AREA - - _ _ _ _ _... _ _ _ -- _ .. ig 1 . 10 f ! o a w m a T2 fj�Mxry piyre Prunus urginrena 1 -6 a Ballad Root 2 Mod-ff to Very High SLn I T9 i,Hamlaek Eastr Tsuge_eanedensis 1 5 B' BalledRoat+ 2 Lax 4igh Shah • Z - _-- - - i " T4 Oak, Bur Ouwcus macrmarpa 1 6 8' Bellsd Roo 2 High SuNPedid a, Pftoi no f_- _. -\ (W F86T) TS j Birch, YeOox Baua allagheniensis t 5 - G [Balled Root 1 or 2 ,.. Moderate , .- Sun/partial. 09222 _ c _ ... _ IO tL I No Text PROJECT DESCRIPTION Kathleen & Thomas Easton, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking conditional use approval to: 1) reconstruct a single family dwelling and increase its footprint by 50%, and 2) allow the height of the reconstructed structure to exceed the 25 foot height limit by 9.4ft for a total height of 34.4 ft, 101 Holmes Road. The project was reviewed on June 1, 2010 and continued so that the applicant could seek a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) to address the property's status as being within the FEMA FIRM -mapped floodplain. The applicant has obtained the LOMA (attached). COMMENTS Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on May 10, 2010 and have the following comments. Table 1. Dimensional Reauiremenia IN Zoning District ` Required Proposed — Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 1.07 acres Max. Building Covera e 20% 4.5% Max. Overall Coverage 40% 13.6% Min. Front Setback 20 ft. >20 ft Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. Maximum Height 25 ft. >30 ft. zoning compliance The maximum height for all structures shall be no more than twenty-five feet above the average pre -construction grade adjoining such structure. The elevations show that the home is proposed to be 344" from the average pre - construction grade to the mid -point of the tallest portion and the eaves. Section 4.08 (referred to from Section 4.07(E) states that the maximum height of a structure in the district may be increased to thirty-five feet if approved by the Development Review Board subject to the provisions of Article 14, Conditional Use Review. In addition, the Development Review Board shall determine hat the proposed increase in height will not affect aversely: a) views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; b) access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; and c) adequate on -site parking Staff has thoroughly reviewed the application for compliance with these criteria, has visited the site, and has spoken with the applicant. The subject property is an unusually large lot in the district, measuring over 1 acre in size. If any property were to be adversely affected with respect to access to sunlight, it would be those to the north and east. The home to the east is approximately 300 feet away, and there are no homes to the north closer than 200 feet. Shadows from this size home will not extend close enough to block access to sunlight of these properties. The applicant will be prepared to talk more about this at the hearing. With respect to views, the Maher property to the east appears to be the only one to be potentially 2 impacted by the taller building. It appears based on the site plan that the optimal view remains slightly to the north of the newly proposed home, and not through the thickest portion of trees and growth which lie between their home and the newly proposed one. Although their home is more than 300 feet to the east, the Board should carefully consider any testimony and evidence they may have with respect to this criterion. The Board discussed the applicant's request for a height waiver and did not express any concerns. 1. The Board grants the applicant's request for a height waiver of 94'; for a building height of 34'4 ". Parking on site is more than adequate. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 12.01(D) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations the proposed structure shall be reviewed as a conditional use and shall meet the following standards: The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Staff feels that the proposed project is consistent with the planned character of the area, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan. According to Section 4.08(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Lakeshore Neighborhood Zoning District is formed in order to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the Lakeshore neighborhoods located in the vicinity of Bartlett Bay Road and Holmes Road. It is designed to promote the area's historic development pattern of smaller lots and reduced setbacks. This district also encourages the conversion of seasonal homes to year round residences. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is consistent with the stated purpose of the Lakeshore Neighborhood District, which is "to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the lake shore neighborhoods located in the vicinity of Bartlett Bay Road and Homes Road. " The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. The proposed project will not adversely affect municipal services. This new home will have no impact on educational facilities. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. 3 The proposed project will not have an adverse affect on the character of the neighborhood or zoning district that this property falls within. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. It is extremely unlikely that this proposed addition will generate any additional traffic. Any traffic that is generated by the newer home will be negligible in its effect on the neighborhood. (d) Bylaws in effect. The proposed addition meets all of the dimensional standards of the zoning district, with the exception of height as noted above. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposed project will not likely affect renewable energy resources. (0 General public health and welfare. The proposed project will not likely have an adverse affect on general public welfare. Pre -Existing Structures along Lake Champlain and within Queen City Park This proposed expansion shall be reviewed under Section 12.01(D) of the SBLDR which includes all lands within one hundred fifty feet horizontal distance of the high water elevation of Lake Champlain. The expansion and reconstruction of pre-existing structures on these lands may be approved by the DRB as a conditional use provided the requirements of the underlying zoning district and the following standards are met: a) The structure to be expanded or reconstructed was originally constructed on or before April 24, 2000. The existing structure meets this criterion. The applicant states that the primary structure was constructed in 1950. b) The expanded or reconstructed structure does not extend any closer, measured in terms of horizontal distance, to the applicable high water elevation or stream centerline than the closest point of the existing structure. The proposed expansion is no closer to the lake than the existing structure. c) The total building footprint area of the expanded or reconstructed structure shall not be more than fifty percent larger than the footprint of the structure lawfully existing on April 24, 2000. The home was 1375 square feet prior to April 24, 2000. The proposed new construction is 2062 SF in footprint and therefore meets this criterion (maximum of 2062.5 allowed): the total of the expansion is approximately 50% larger than the footprint of the existing structure. C! d) An erosion control plan for construction is submitted by a licensed engineer detailing controls that will be put in place during construction or expansion to protect the associated surface water. The applicant has submitted a sufficient and well -planned erosion control plan. e) A landscaping plan showing plans to preserve, maintain and supplement existing trees and ground cover vegetation is submitted and the DRB finds that the overall plan will provide a visual and vegetative buffer for the lake and/or stream. The plan indicates existing landscaping on the property which primarily consists of a monoculture of trees and shrubby undergrowth. The applicant has submitted a detailed Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan which outlines the goals for landscaping and seeding on the property. 12.01 General Stream and Surface Water Protection Standards A. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Section to provide for the protection and improvement of the surface waters and streams within the City of South Burlington, Lake Champlain and Shelburne Bay, and the watersheds contained wholly or partially within the City. These regulations and standards are intended to lead to the establishment and protection of natural areas along the City's surface waters to provide improved protection for water quality and the provision of open space areas and wildlife habitat. Section 12.01(C)(1)(e) applies C. Surface Water Buffer Standards ("Stream Buffers") (e) All land within one hundred fifty (150) feet horizontal distance of the high water elevation of Lake Champlain, which for purposes of these regulations shall be one hundred two (102) feet above mean sea level datum. (2) General standards. It is the objective of these standards to promote the establishment of heavily vegetated areas of native vegetation and trees in order to reduce the impact of stormwater runoff, reduce sedimentation, and increase infiltration and base flows in the City's streams and Lake Champlain. Therefore, except as specifically permitted by the DRB pursuant to the standards in Section 12.01(C)(3), (C)(4), (D) and/or (E) below, all lands within a required stream buffer defined above shall be left in an undisturbed, naturally vegetated condition. Supplemental planting and landscaping with appropriate species of vegetation to achieve these objectives shall be permitted. The specific standards for the vegetation and maintenance of stream buffers are as follows: (a) The clearing of trees that are not dead, heavily damaged by ice storms or other natural events, or diseased, and the clearing of any other vegetation other than invasive species, is permitted only in conjunction with DRB approval pursuant to (3) or (4) below. (b) Any areas within a required stream buffer that are not vegetated or that are disturbed during construction shall be seeded with a naturalized mix of grasses rather than standard lawn grass, and shall not be mowed more than one (1) time per calendar year after establishment. (c) The creation of new lawn areas within stream buffers is not permitted after the effective date of these regulations. 5 There shall be no clearing of trees on the site with the exception of those which meet the standards outlined above. 2. There shall be no clearing of trees on the site with the exception of that which meets the standards outlined in Section 12.01 C(2) of the SBLDR. (3) Expansion of pre-existing structures within stream buffers. The expansion of pre-existing structures within stream buffers, except as provided in Section D below, shall be permitted only in accordance with the standards for non -complying structures in Article 3, Section 3.11 of these Regulations. D. Pre -Existing Structures along Lake Champlain and within Queen City Park (1) Applicability. The provisions of this section shall apply to preexisting structures within the areas defined as follows: (a) All lands within one hundred fifty (150) feet horizontal distance of the high water elevation of Lake Champlain, which for purposes of these regulations shall be one hundred two (102) feet above mean sea level datum; (b) All lands within the Queen City Park zoning district located within one hundred (100) feet horizontal distance of the centerline of Potash Brook. (2) Expansion and construction of pre-existing structures. Within the areas defined in Section (D)(1) above, the expansion and reconstruction of pre-existing structures may be approved by the DRB as a conditional use provided the requirements of the underlying zoning district and the following standards are met: (a) The structure to be expanded or reconstructed was originally constructed on or before April 24, 2000. For purposes of these Regulations, expansion may include the construction of detached accessory structures including garages and utility sheds. (b) The expanded or reconstructed structure does not extend any closer, measured in terms of horizontal distance, to the applicable high water elevation or stream centerline than the closest point of the existing structure. (c) The total building footprint area of the expanded or reconstructed structure shall not be more than fifty percent (50%) larger than the footprint of the structure lawfully existing on April 24, 2000. For purposes of these regulations, reconstruction may include razing the existing structure and/or foundation and constructing a new structure in accordance with the provisions of the underlying zoning district regulations and this section. (d) An erosion control plan for construction is submitted by a licensed engineer detailing controls that will be put in place during construction or expansion to protect the associated surface water. (e) A landscaping plan showing plans to preserve, maintain and supplement existing trees and ground cover vegetation is submitted and the DRB finds that the overall plan will provide a visual and vegetative buffer for the lake and/or stream. (3) Erosion control measures and water -oriented development along Lake Champlain. Within the area along Lake Champlain defined in Section (D)(1)(a) above, the installation of erosion control measures and water -oriented development may be approved by the DRB as a conditional use provided the following standards are met: (a) The improvement involves, to the greatest extent possible, the use of natural materials such as wood and stone. (b) The improvement will not increase the potential for erosion. (c) The improvement will not have an undue adverse impact on the aesthetic integrity of the lakeshore. In making a determination pursuant to this criterion, the DRB may request C1 renderings or other additional information relevant and necessary to evaluating the visual impact of the proposed improvement. (d) A landscaping plan showing plans to preserve, maintain and supplement existing trees and ground cover vegetation is submitted and the DRB finds that the overall plan will provide a visual and vegetative buffer for the lake and/or stream. Staff has already discussed these issues above in this report. The applicant has also submitted a stormwater management and erosion control plan as well as a riparian corridor restoration plan (attached). The applicant has also addressed the Class III wetlands on the site, along with their functions and values in a report from a wetland professional. Staff has reviewed all of the aforementioned documents and has no concerns with the proposal with respect to the above criteria relating to construction along the Lakeshore. FLOOD PLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT The subject property lies within the Floodplain Overlay District as outlined in the SBLDRs. The existing home and proposed home are at least partially within the overlay. The South Burlington Land Development Regulations are very specific about what may and may not be built in this overlay district, and single family homes are not permitted unless in conjunction with agriculture, park, or recreation facilities. The Floodplain Overlay District map is out of date and in some places inaccurate. FEMA has been working on redrawing the maps using proper ground delineations and a map of the new boundaries is available in draft form. However, it is only a draft and has not yet been adopted. The proposed home would be OUTSIDE of the new boundary. However, again, this is only a draft and is not official until adopted. At the last meeting, staff advised the applicant to seek a letter of map amendment which would ensure that the subject structure is outside of the flood plain overlay. This letter is attached. The federal map for delineated flood plains supersedes the local overlap map. Therefore, staff does not find that the Flood Plain Overlay District regulations apply to the proposed development on this property. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Conditional Use Application #CU-10-07. Respectfully submitted, J athya LaRose, AICP, Associate Planner Copy to: Kathleen and Thomas Easton, Property Owners Dave Marshall, Civil Engineering Associates, Contact for Applicant 7 ,O�VERMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency of Natural Resources WASTEWATER SYSTEM ANTI) POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED io V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective April 25, 2005 Permit Number: WW-4-3595 Landowner: Thomas & Kathy Easton 135 Covington Lane Shelburne VT 05482 This permit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: 0870-0101 and referenced in deeds recorded in Book 799 Page 213 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of demolishing and reconstructing a three bedroom single family served by municipal water and wastewater services located at 101 Holmes Road in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. i.GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the application, plans and/or documents prepared by David Marshall, P.E. for Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., with the stamped plans listed as follows: Sheet Number Title Plan Date Plan Revision Date -C-1.0 Site Location Plan 2/2010 C-2.0 Existing condition Plan 11/24/2ob9 C-5.0 Site Utility Plan 2/2010 C-7.0 Details 3/2010 10/12/2010 C8.o Specifications 10/2010 1.2 The project shall not deviate from the stamped plans in a manner that would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location, or, the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 1.3 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Water Quality Division — telephone (802) 241-3770, the Department Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety— telephone (802) 879-2300, and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 1.4 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall be responsible for the recording of this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable WaI 'Supply Permit WW-4-3595 Page 2 of 3 1.5 Each prospective purchaser of the lot shall be shown copies of the Wastewater System And Potable Water Supply Permit and the stamped plans prior to conveyance of the lot. 1.6 By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. 1.7- In issuing this permit, the Division has relied upon the licensed designer's certification that the design - related information submitted was true and correct, and complies with the Vermont Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules and the Vermont Water Supply Rules. This permit may be revoked if it is determined that the project does not comply with these Rules. 1.8 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with 10 V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2.4VATER SUPPLY 2.1 No permit issued by the Secretary shall remain valid after substantial completion of a potable water supply until the Secretary receives a signed and dated certification from a designer or an installer, as specified in the permit, that states: 7 hereby certify that in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply was installed in accordance with: the permitted design and all permit conditions; or record drawings and such record drawings are in compliance with the applicable rules, were filed with the Secretary, and are in accordance with all other permit conditions; was inspected; was properly tested; and has successfully met those performance tests." This certification shall include the water service to the residence. Compliance with this condition is required prior to occupancy of the reconstructed residence. 2.2 This project is approved for connection to the South Burlington municipal water system as depicted on the stamped plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 405 gallons of water per day. No changes to the water supply shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. 3.WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 3.1 No permit issued by the Secretary shall remain valid after substantial completion of a wastewater system until the Secretary receives a signed and dated certification from a designer or an installer, as specified in the permit, that states: "I hereby certify that in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the wastewater system was installed in accordance with: the permitted design and all permit conditions; or record drawings and such record drawings are in compliance with the applicable rules, were filed with the Secretary, and are in accordance with all other permit conditions; was inspected; was properly tested; and has successfully met those performance tests." This certification shall include the wastewater system and wastewater service lines to each structure. Compliance with this condition is required prior to occupancy of the reconstructed residence. Wastewater System and Potable Watc-Aupply Permit WW-4-3595 Page 3 of 3 3.2 This project is approved for connection to the South Burlington municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the stamped plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 210 gallons of wastewater per day. No changes to the wastewater disposal system shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. 3.3 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the municipal approval expires, and the municipality files a written request with the Secretary, the Secretary will remove the sewage allocation for this project from the list of committed reserve capacity. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval and does not request that the Secretary remove the sewage allocation for this project from the list of committed reserve. Once the project is removed from the list of committed reserve capacity, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. Justin G. Johnson, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Ernest Christianson, Regional Engineer Dated October 18, 2010 cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. June 16, 2010 Dave Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 101 Holmes Avenue Dear Mr. Marshall: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on June 15, 2010 (effective 6/15/10). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me Sincerely, JanaBleagley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT # 7010 0290 0000 2215 2531 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com South PLANNING & ZONING June 16, 2010 Kathleen and Thomas Easton 135 Covington Lane Shelburne, VT 05482-6656 Re: 101 Holmes Avenue Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com June 16, 2010 Sally Ryan 117 Holmes Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 101 Holmes Avenue Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Interested Persons Record and Service List f: ?d0NT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working tt days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME K'7rr"' MAILING ADDRESS ^IUD � 13 �UV T-ow, (1 �OJAUSA I've ' (Lg UQrIt PROJECT OF INTEREST ti -2-0-71 C,,� (t'J1.,-, Iq V7` j 5 •`3f c,� - V7- V77 Interested Persons Record and Service List soot hu,f _----__ _ Vr.sMPNT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: 201 O PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY. NAME — MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST '�� � d � t��-rzs .�-few-t._ i b �►�t���-� �r�' � lot SID�_r erttc S VhVu,A- 1 I t l 4) Sn --;,, (I . + �T_ I.r W t F:n V`o..U7 Z M-eC4dAW Jr c�i I I I � c i May 13, 2010 Kathleen and Thomas Easton 135 Covington Lane Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: 101 Holmes Road Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public hearing notice that will be printed in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 tel 802.846,4106 fax 802,846.4101 www.sburl.cojyR RAili WE t,,:°rli w PLANNING & ZONING May 13, 2010 David M. Farrell Trust 25 Bartlett Bay Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 101 Holmes Road Dear Property Owner: Enclosed, is a copy of a public notice that will be published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that"Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding" If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, ,p 6q Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, V( 0S403 teI 802,846.1106 fay, 80.846,4101 www.shurl.cvm �clol Yq"-/"// SUNWARD Collector Mounting Choices Ground-Mount:Y�1_ �� Steel Rack atures: ,urable powder -coated finish • Corrosion -free stainless steel hardware 'djustable feet for easy leveling • No footings required arth anchors provide stability • Assembles in about 2 hours -ludes: solar Rack )0' Burial Kit (2) 50' pre -insulated 3/8" copper tubing, insulation, 50' 3" flexible conduit, 150' of UV resistant 4-strand power cable with pre -wired weather -head connectors) • (2) 50' of pre -insulated 3/8 copper tubing (1.5" closed cell insulation) • Ground Anchor Kit w/ Drive Rod • High quality Parker 3/8" Compression Fitting Kit (8 straight fitting and 4 90 degree fittings • 2-Piece Exterior Conduit Kit (2 4' sections, 2 end fittings, 3"x2" flexible coupling) 2. Ground -Mount: Timber Frame Kit Features: • Rough -cut hemlock can be finished to your taste into a shed, playhouse or simply used free-standing as a firewood shelter • Pressure -treated sill • Galvanized roofing • No footings required • Earth anchors provide stability • Assembles in about 8 hours Includes: • Timber -Frame • Galvanized Roofing • 2.5 Ibs of nails • Roofing screws • 50' Burial Kit ((2) 50' pre -insulated 3/8" copper tubing, 50' 3" flexible conduit, 150' of UV resistant 4-strand power cable with pre -wired weather - head connectors) • (2) 50' of pre -insulated 3/8 copper tubing (1.5" diam. closed cell insulation) • Ground Anchor Kit w/ Drive Rod • High quality Parker 3/8" Compression Fitting Kit (8 straight fitting and 4 90 degree fittings) • 2-Piece Exterior Conduit Kit (2 4' sections, 2 end fittings, 3"x2" flexible coupling) • Assembly instructions 3. Roof -Mount: Steel Mounting Kit Features: • Durable powder -coated finish • Corrosion -free stainless steel hardware Includes: • (2) 100' of pre -insulated 3/8 copper tubing (1.5" closed cell insulation) • 100' of UV resistant 4-strand power cable with pre -wired weather -head connectors • Roof Flashing Kit (Powder -coated aluminum roof flashing boot, tube of Proplex tripolymer sealant) • High quality Parker 3/8" Compression Fitting Kit (8 straight fitting and 4 90 degree fittings) • All hardware including roofing brackets, lag bolts, collector brackets, hex bolts, washers and locknuts • 2-Piece Exterior Conduit Kit (3 8' sections, 2 connectors, 2 90 elbows, 2 wall inlets) 75 MEIGS ROAD VERGENNES VT 05491 r �WJ ql % ©2010U10096 F / / lC. AR Federal Emergency Management Agency � Washington, D.C. 20472 �qND SE��4` June 08, 2010 MR, DAVID MARSHALL CASE NO.: 10-01-1393A CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. COMMUNITY: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, 10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 COMMUNITY NO.: 500195 DEAR MR. MARSHALL: This is in reference to a request that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) determine if the property described in the enclosed document is located within an identified Special Flood Hazard Area, the area that would be inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood), on the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map. Using the information submitted and the effective NFIP map, our determination is shown on the attached Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) Determination Document. This determination document provides additional information regarding the effective NFIP map, the legal description of the property and our determination. Additional documents are enclosed which provide information regarding the subject property and LOMAs. Please see the List of Enclosures below to determine which documents are enclosed. Other attachments specific to this request may be included as referenced in the Determination/Comment document. If you have any questions about this letter or any of the enclosures, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Attn: STARR eLOMA Coordinator, Keith Loudin, 12101 Indian Creek Court, Beltsville, MD 20705, Fax: 301-210-4539. Sincerely, Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief Engineering Management Branch Mitigation Directorate LIST OF ENCLOSURES: LOMA DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) cc: State/Commonwealth NFIP Coordinator Community Map Repository Region Page 1 of 3 Date: June 08, 2010 Case N 6-01-1393A LOMA 04YPh,R i. b Federal Emergency Management Agency x\ fi Washington, D.C. 20472 �79ND 54�J LETTER OF MAP AMENDMENT DETERMINATION DOCUMENT REMOVAL COMMUNITY AND MAP PANEL INFORMATION LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, A parcel of land, as described in the Executor's Deed, recorded in CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT Book 799, Pages 213 through 215, in the Office of the City Clerk, City of South Burlington, Vermont COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NO.: 500195 AFFECTED NUMBER:5001950005B MAP PANEL DATE: 3/16/1981 FLOODING SOURCE: LAKE CHAMPLAIN APPROXIMATE LATITUDE & LONGITUDE OF PROPERTY: 44.433,-73.219 SOURCE OF LAT & LONG: GOOGLE EARTH DATUM: NAD 83 DETERMINATION OUTCOME 1%ANNUAL LOWEST LOWEST WHAT IS CHANCE ADJACENT LOT LOT BLOCK/ SUBDIVISION STREET REMOVED FROM FLOOD FLOOD GRADE ELEVATION SECTION THE SFHA ZONE ELEVATION ELEVATION (NGVD 29) NGVD 29) (NGVD 29 Camp 870-00101 Boisvert 101 Holmes Road Structure B 102.5 feet Lot Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) - The SFHA is an area that would be inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year base flood). ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Please refer to the appropriate section on Attachment 1 for the additional considerations listed below. eLOMA DETERMINATION this document provides the Federal Emergency Management Agency's determination regarding a request for a Letter of Map Amendment for the property described above. Using the information submitted and the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map, we have determined that the structure(s) on the property(ies) is/are not located in the SFHA, an area inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood). This document amends the effective NFIP map to remove the subject property from the SFHA located on the effective NFIP map, therefore, the Federal mandatory flood insurance requirement does not apply. However, the lender has the option to continue the flood insurance requirement to protect its financial risk on the loan. A Preferred Risk Policy (PRP) is available for buildings located outside the SFHA. Information about the PRP and how one can apply is enclosed. This determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Attn: STARR eLOMA Coordinator, Keith Loudin, 12101 Indian Creek Court, Beltsville, MD 20705, Fax: 301-210-4539. Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief Engineering Management Branch eLOMA Mitigation Directorate Easton Residential Property 101 Holmes Road Conditional Use Narrative The maximum height of a structure may be increased to thirty-five (35) feet if approved by the Development Review Board subject to the provisions of Article 14, Conditional Use Review as outlined below: (1) The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The existing residential use permitted in the Lakeshore Neighborhood zoning district will be retained with the proposed project. (2) The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is to be located. The Lakeshore Neighborhood District (LN) was formed in order to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the lake shore neighborhoods located in the vicinity of Bartlett Bay Road and Holmes Road. The district is designed to promote the area's historic development pattern of smaller lots and minimal setbacks. This district encourages the conversion of seasonal homes to year round residences. The project proposes to retain the character of the existing setbacks while improving the existing structure so that it is more consistent with the character of the neighborhood. (3) The proposed use shall not adversely affect: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. The proposed project does not propose any increase in density so there should be minimal impacts on the capacity of the municipal and school infrastructure. (b) The planned character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, or the ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. The proposed project seeks to develop a single family residence of a size in keeping with the existing character of the neighborhood. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposed project does not propose any increase in density so there should be minimal impacts on the capacity of the roads and highways in the vicinity. Page 1 of 3 (d) Bylaws in effect. The project is subject to the requirements of the Land Development Regulations which will be required to be met in order for the supporting permits to be issued. A list of the applicable ordinances is outlined below: Impact Fee Ordinance - All applicable impact fees will be paid at the time of the request for a Zoning Permit. Parks Ordinance - Not Applicable Control & Prevention of Fire Ordinance - This application does not propose any activity inconsistent with the requirements of this ordinance. Grease Trap Ordinance - Not Applicable as this is not a commercial entity. Animal Control Ordinance - This application does not propose any activity inconsistent with the requirements of this ordinance. Public Nuisance Ordinance - This application does not propose any activity inconsistent with the requirements of this ordinance. Alarms Ordinance - This application does not propose any activity inconsistent with the requirements of this ordinance. Sign Ordinance - This application does not propose any activity inconsistent with the requirements of this ordinance. Tree Ordinance - This is not applicable as there are no trees proposed to be removed on City property. Sanitary Sewer & Stormwater Ordinance - This application seeks to update the existing sewer service to bring it into conformance with the existing material requirements. Sign Ordinance Amendment of Section 13 - This ordinance is not applicable as there is no approved non-residential use on this property subject to the signage requirements in this ordinance. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposed building has been designed with an east -west orientation in order to maximize passive and future solar use. The site has been designed so that there will be no impacts on the abutting properties relative to access to sun or wind. Page 2 of 3 In addition, the Development Review Board shall determine that the proposed increase in height will not affect adversely: (a) Views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; The views from the Maher and Weissman properties are primarily out to the Lake in the westerly direction. The proposed house is located northeast of Weissman and has no impact on the view. The proposed house is located southwest of Maher and does not change the optimum viewshed of Maher (See overall site plan) . The proposed building footprint preserves the existing viewshed for individuals on Holmes Road out to Lake Champlain in the west -northeasterly direction. (b) Access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; and If there were any impacts it would be in the easterly and northerly directions with regard to access to sunlight. The existing location of the Maher property is 80 feet to the east and approximately 300 feet to the house. The Maher property line to the north is 200 feet away and the nearest structure is 250 feet to the north. All far enough away to be able to confirm by inspection that the proposed structure height will have no adverse impacts on the abutting properties. (c) Adequate on -site parking. The proposed site plan provides for both daily and guest parking suitable to minimize impacts on access along Holmes Road. Page 3 of 3 Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan Easton Property 101 Holmes Road Existing Conditions - The existing conditions at the site generally includes a lack of subcanopy vegetation due to the lack of light reaching the ground. Mature hemlocks located along the south embankment cut off light all year round. The presence of these trees have also suppressed any significant vegetative cover on the ground along the top portions and slopes of the embankment area. Stormwater from Holmes Road and the residential use flows northwesterly to the top and down the embankment slopes down to the wetland below. Basis of Design - The proposed riparian corridor restoration plan for the Easton property utilizes the design recommendations of the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. This restoration plan focuses on three primary goals. 1. Stormwater filtering 2. Wildlife Habitat creation 3. Site Stabilization Secondary benefits of the proposed restoration program include: restoration of riparian plant communities, providing a source of detritus and large woody debris and increasing carbon storage. Wetland Augmentation - Due to the lack of sunlight there is little if any vegetation with any significant wildlife benefit. There is no significant cover or feed available. The removal of the hemlocks from the south embankment will open this area up to enable more beneficial wetland species to be introduced or to regenerate within this area. The proposed planting plan provides the momentum to restore vegetation favorable for wildlife cover and feed. Natural regeneration from seeds distributed from introducing plantings and those further described below in the Zone 1 and 2 management areas will lead to a more vibrant and diversified community. Following the guidelines of the NRCS, a three zone system in the non wetland area was developed. Page 1 of 3 Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan Easton, 101 Holmes Road Management Zone 1 - this is located immediately adjacent to the wetland itself and represents the transition from facultative wetland species to facultative upland species. This zone was split up into an eastern portion closest to the retained hemlock trees which will continue to experience significant shading and a western portion which will provide a new subcanopy habitat. Plantings in this area are carefully chosen to provide improved wildlife habitat while also recognizing the seasonal saturation of the soils at the base of the embankment due to groundwater seeps. Between the shrub and tree plantings, a mixture of warm and cool season grasses, further modified to achieve the recommended seeding rates and types for the binding of the slopes (set forth by the State of Vermont Erosion Control Manual) was chosen to provide initial cover. These grasses provide important cover and browse material for wildlife in support of the goals of augmenting the otherwise existing homogenous environment. In order to provide diversity and to avoid wholesale loss of cover, a mixture of at least five (5) different species is employed in each management zone. Based on the NRCS recommendations, Shrub community plantings were placed on 10-foot to 12-foot spacing while the tree community areas are to be planted with 12-foot to 15-foot spacings. Management Zone 2 - This represents the upland portion of the riparian corridor. This zone was also broken up into eastern and wester portions with the eastern portion being subject to shade and partial sun conditions while the western portion would be subject to sun and partial sun conditions. The plantings chosen for this area took into account the dryer soil conditions and offered high to very high wildlife habitat value due to a combination of cover and feed opportunities in addition to the sun light availability. Plant materials such as elderberry and dogwoods were chosen to limit the encroachment of invasive species during initial grow -in of this area. Similar to Zone 1, this management area will also benefit from the seeding of the site with the wildlife and soil stabilization grasses between the proposed shrub and tree plantings. Page 2 of 3 Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan Easton, 101 Holmes Road Management Zone 3 - This zone represents the primary means of filtering runoff from the residential use and transportation corridor. The grass types chosen for this zone located along the top of the embankment provide both nutrient uptake as well as habitat benefits through improved cover characteristics. This area is not to be mowed and is protected with a spilt rail fence to keep residential uses from creeping into the riparian corridor area. These grasses are similar to those used in Zones 1 and 2 except that the additional application of Switchgrass and Love grass has been cut back where steep slopes are not present. PA\AutoCADD Projects\2009\09222\Design Issues\Riparian Design\Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan Narrative.wpd Page 3 of 3 Stormwater Management Plan Kathleen & Thomas Easton 101 Holmes Road South Burlington, Vermont I The plans submitted on behalf of the Stormwater Management Plan are required to provide supporting information for review and approval by the City of South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent. We have summarized the location and character of the information as outlined below: A. Existing conditions and proposed condition site plans including: I. Site location - Overall location plan is shown on Sheet C-1. This includes all of the properties located along the riparian corridor. ii. Location, type and size of all proposed impervious areas (e.g. roofs, pavement, gravel drive, etc...) Sheet C-2 depicts the existing conditions while Sheet C-3 "proposed Grading Plan" depicts the proposed conditions for the lot. iii. Location, type, size and specifications for all proposed Low Impact Development (LID) installations. The low impact development installations to be used include: A. Sheet flow disconnection along walk ways B. Grass lined swales which collect runoff from the nearby pavement surfaces. C. Filtration strips along the east and north edges of the project. iv. Drainage ways, natural waterbodies, and sub -watershed boundaries, with sufficient information to determine the site's relationship to these features on surrounding properties. Sheet C-1 shows the relationship of the property to the riparian corridor, the wetlands within the corridor and the unnamed stream. The far western portions of the property abut Lake Champlain. v. Existing and proposed stormwater collection systems, culverts, detention basins and other stormwater treatment practices. Sheet C-4 "Stormwater Management Plan" depicts the stormwater management components of the project. vi. Topography - All of the above referenced plans depict the existing and proposed topography for the site and surrounding areas. vii.Soil types and/or hydrologic soil group Sheet C-4 "Stormwater management Plan" depicts the soil mapping and subwatersheds for the project. viii.Existing and proposed landscaping, including existing tree canopy and other vegetation and any proposed alterations thereto Sheet L-1 depicts the proposed landscaping for the project. The proposed plantings and ground cover has been specifically Stormwater Management Plan Eston Property - 101 Holmes Road Page 2 of 4 chosen to provide improved ground cover, diversity and wildlife habitat over what currently exists today. ix. Delineated wetlands - All of the plans depict the delineated wetlands. Brief Description of the Proposed LID Techniques. Minimize Pavement Widths - The applicant has utilized AutoTurn software to carefully document the maximum limits of pavement surface required to enable the design vehicle to access the site. 2. Site Fingerprinting - The project fill areas have been designed to minimize impacts on the surrounding resource area by steepening the fill slopes to 2:1 which balances impact against long term stability (and subsequently water quality) by reducing the potential for localized slip plane failure or erosion. 3. Landscaping Practices - The site currently is comprised of a large amount of mature hemlock trees. This canopy has created a monoculture of plant life in the wetland and has effectively eliminated most vegetation on the embankment leading from the plateau adjacent to Holmes Road down to the lower flood plain. The proposed project will introduce light into portions of the riparian corridor which in turn will assist in eliminating the monoculture of plant life and lack of subcanopy wildlife habitat. The proposed landscaping plan proposes the implementation of a riparian corridor planting plan where the ground cover and plant species have been specifically chosen to provide improved surface coverage and wildlife habitat. 4. Disconnection of impervious area - The proposed grading plan has included shallow sloped grassed areas to assist in infiltration off of impervious surfaces, to provide initial treatment and to avoid the placement of plowed snow over the embankment areas. 5. Rain Gardens - Portion of the perimeter of the house is proposed to be landscaped with planting beds which will provide improved infiltrative capacities. Stormwater Management Plan Eston Property - 101 Holmes Road Page 3 of 4 6. Soil Conservation and Amendments - The project EPSC plan calls for the stockpiling of the existing topsoil. The proposed planting plan calls for appropriate levels of amendments based upon testing of the existing and any imported topsoils. Soil conservation and amendment practices often result in improved plant growth. 7. Runoff Conveyance Practices - The proposed fill utilizes the terracing with reverse slope with vegetated slopes. The EPSC plan calls for surface roughening of the slope in conjunction with the use of erosion control matting to help minimize rill erosion from occurring. 8. Vegetated Swale - The project employs the use of grass lined swales prior to collection at the drain inlets as a means of providing some infiltrative and treatment of the stormwater from the adjacent impervious surfaces. Maintenance Plan for All Proposed Stormwater Treatment Practices 3. Landscaping Practices - In general, maintenance requirements for LID landscaping practices are less than those associated with conventional landscaping practices. LID landscaped areas may initially require the application of fertilizer and frequent watering to establish selected plants. However, once established these areas should require little to no ongoing watering and fertilizing. Periodic maintenance activities commonly include; replanting damaged vegetation, trimming and pruning established shrubs and trees and removing weeds and debris. 4. Disconnection of impervious area - There are no formal maintenance requirements associated with the practice of impervious area disconnection. Vegetated pervious areas should be periodically inspected and maintained as needed to prevent erosion and the accumulation of sediment and debris. 5. Rain Gardens - Rain gardens require frequent watering initially to establish the selected plants. Eroded areas should be repaired and accumulated liter and debris removed as needed. About once a year dead plants and weeds should be removed and the filter bed surface should be remulched. 6. Soil Conservation and Amendments - Periodic maintenance activities commonly include; replanting damaged vegetation, trimming and pruning Stormwater Management Plan Eston Property - 101 Holmes Road Page 4 of 4 established shrubs and trees and removing weeds and debris. Landscaped areas established in organically sufficient topsoil do not typically require fertilization and often need less irrigation than those areas established in impacted soil. Efforts should be taken to reduce excessive soil compaction in conserved and amended areas. 8. Vegetated Swale -Annual inspections shall ensure the successful establishment of vegetative cover and that the system is free of accumulated debris. Grass within treatment swales should be mowed at least twice during the growing season to maintain a height of 6 inches. Erosion gullies should be repaired and accumulated sediment removed as necessary. Dry swales can periodically require cultivating of the channel bed in order to increase the permeability of the system. The VSWMM contains an operation, maintenance and management inspection checklist for vegetated swales. 9. Filter Strip - The filter strip shall be harvested (cut) once a year to encourage dense growth, maintain an upright growth habit and remove nutrients and other contaminants that are contained in the plant tissue. Undesirable weed species, especially state listed noxious weeds shall be controlled. The filter strip shall be inspected after storm events and any gullies that have formed shall be repaired. Remove any unevenly deposited sediment that will disrupt sheet flow. Reseed disturbed areas and manage flows to avoid concentrated flows through the filter strip. Apply supplemental nutrients as needed according to soil tests to maintain the desired species composition and stand density of the filter strip. P:\AutoCADD Projects\2009\09222\Permitting\City\Stormwater Management Report.wpd Oakledge Environmental Services, Inc. P.O. Box 4065, Burlington, VT 05406 (802) 660-8312 To: Dave Marshall From: Jeffrey Severson Date: May 6, 2010 Re: Wetland evaluation of Easton property,101 Holmes Road, South Burlington, VT This report summarizes my wetland evaluation of the Easton property at 101 Holmes Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The wetland -related work consisted of identifying and delineating the wetland boundaries on the property, characterizing the wetland and its geographical location, evaluating and summarizing the wetland functions and values. On September 12, 2007 I visited the subject property to identify and delineate any wetlands. I identified a single wetland, which occupies a portion of the floodplain of a small stream located to the north of the existing house. I delineated the southern wetland boundary on the Easton property following the criteria outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. The northern wetland boundary is located off of the subject property and was not delineated as part of this evaluation. The wetland boundary was surveyed by Civil Engineering Associates, and is shown on the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet C-2). The wetland delineation was reviewed and approved on September 24, 2007 by Julie Foley, the District Wetland Ecologist for the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. The wetland on the subject property is a Class Three wetland, as it is not mapped as a Class Two wetland on the Vermont Significant Wetland Map (VSWI) for the site, and is not contiguous — sharing a common boundary with — a mapped Class Two wetland. Ms. Foley concurred with the Class Three wetland designation for the wetland after her September 24, 2007 site visit. The wetland at the site is located within the floodplain of an existing small, unnamed stream that flows westward into Lake Champlain along and near the northern boundary of the Easton property. The location of the wetland and stream in the vicinity of the subject property are shown on the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet C-2). The watershed of the stream encompasses a mosaic of residential and commercial properties on the west side of Shelburne Road, and a mix of forested stream buffers and patches of open mowed fields and lawns in its headwaters. Closer to the site, the stream runs across a large open mowed field and drains a large section of the maintained grounds of a large estate to the north of the Easton parcel that is characterized by a closed forest canopy with a rather heavily manicured understory. Steep forested banks border the wetland on and adjacent to the Easton property with minimal understory vegetation beneath the forest canopy. Portions of the forested banks were used historically as a dump, and the Eastons have recently removed large quantities of refuse as part of their efforts to restore the forested wetland buffer. The forested wetland on the Easton property is characterized by a partially open canopy of black ash (Fraxinus nigra), with a sub -canopy of black ash and American Elm (Ulmus americana). A Easton Property 2 Wetland Report number of the trees exhibit morphological adaptations to a seasonally high water table in the wetland (e.g. shallow root systems). Woody understory vegetation is characterized by a general absence of a developed shrub horizon, and relatively few saplings — the wetland has the appearance of being kept open by the removal of some of the woody understory vegetation. Some smallish clusters of low red -osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) were noted near the toe of the steep slope along the southern side of the wetland. Herbaceous vegetation is characterized by species that include sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis) and an unidentified sedge (Carex sp.). The position of the wetland on the landscape — at the mouth of the stream adjacent to Lake Champlain within the floodplain of a small stream that potentially transports urban runoff to the Lake - contributes to wetland functions and values related to water storage, water quality and erosion control. The wetland provides a certain amount of potential water storage capacity for floodwater and storm runoff due to its position in the stream floodplain where surface water can expand. The significance of the wetland for water storage, however, is diminished by its location directly adjacent to Lake Champlain, which provides an enormous amount of water storage capacity independent of the wetland. The wetland is significant for surface water protection as it is positioned to capture and retain sediments, nutrients, or other pollutants in urban runoff that may migrate into the stream or lake. Potential sources of sediments and nutrients and other potential pollutants include exposed soils on the steep heavily shaded banks adjacent to the wetland, runoff from adjacent residential properties, and sediments and pollutants contained in urban runoff that enter the stream system. Portions of the wetland are located within the floodplain of Lake Champlain, and the wetland may act seasonally as a small settling basin where sediments transported into the wetland via lake flooding have an opportunity to settle out. Finally, the wetland contributes to erosion control through binding and stabilizing the soils along the unnamed stream that flows through the site. The lower portion of the wetland that lies within the floodplain of Lake Champlain may also contribute to soil stabilization by dissipating wave action during spring high water events when Lake levels can potentially top the shoreline sand berm and flood into the wetland. Water Quality Division FAx 802.879.3871 111 West Street TEL 802.879.5650 Essex Jct., VT 05452 e-mail: October 9, 2007 Thomas R. and Kathleen H. Easton 10456 Burke Lake Road Fairfax Station, VA 22039-1808 Subiect: 101 Holmes Road, South Burlington, Proiect # 2007-462 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Easton: This letter serves to follow-up my site visit to the above -referenced property on September 24, 2007 to confirm the wetland classification with Jeff Severson. I have determined that the property contains Class Three wetlands, as there is not a connection to a mapped Class II wetland. Since the wetland is Class Three, you do not need a Conditional Use Determination from our office to reconstruct the existing home on the property. If you choose to purchase the property, I would recommend that you give as much breadth as possible to the adjacent wetland, as it drains directly to the lake. If your plans include impacts to the wetland, I suggest you contact the Army Corps of Engineers at (802)872-2983, as your project may trigger their jurisdiction. If you should have any questions, please feel to call me at 879-5650. Sincerely, Julie Foley District Wetland Ecologist cc: City of South Burlington Jeffrey Severson Standards for Wetlands Protection Article 12.02 (E)(3) Easton Property 101 Holmes Road A Class Three Wetland is located in the lower elevation portion of the Easton property that borders a small unnamed stream that flows westward into Lake Champlain. The Wetland Report for the project outlines the wetland delineation, describes the wetland and its geographical setting, and summarizes the significant functions of the wetland description. As noted in the Wetland Report for the project, the District Wetland Ecologist from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation reviewed and approved the wetland delineation and confirmed that the wetland is a Class Three wetland. The local Standards for Wetland Protection are outlined in the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Article 12.02 (E) (3) of the Standards for Wetland Protection describes the conditions under which encroachment into a Class Three wetland or Class Three Wetland Buffer are permitted. (3) Encroachment into Class II wetland buffers, Class III wetlands and Class III wetland buffers, may be permitted by the DR13 upon finding that the proposed project's overall development, erosion control, stormwater treatment system, provisions for stream buffering, and landscaping plan achieve the following standards for wetland protection: (a) The encroachment(s) will not adversely affect the ability of the property to carry or store flood waters adequately. Flood storage is important in detaining excess stormwater flows and reducing flood impacts downstream. There is an unnamed tributary on the Easton property, which flows westerly into Lake Champlain. When the lake level is high, the edge of the lake extends into the Easton property and the flood storage benefits of the stream and its surrounds become minimal. The proposed project seeks to fill a small portion of the lower elevation area that is located within the backwater flood limits of the Lake. Because the fill limits are so small, this will have no impact on the storage capabilities of the Lake. During periods when the lake is lower, the benefits of excess stormwater storage Page 1 of 3 are fairly limited as the distance to the lake is so short. Since the proposed filling is located at a narrowing or choke point of the stream corridor, there should be no impact on the stream stability after the project has been completed. (b) The encroachment(s) will not adversely affect the ability of the proposed stormwater treatment system to reduce sedimentation according to state standards. Existing conditions at the site include a steep embankment with little or no understory ground cover. As such, there are virtually no retention or sediment storage capabilities. The proposed program calls for the use of a well -vegetated flatter slope from the top plateau down to the low area with filtration vegetation to mitigate the sediment load from Holmes Road and any winter sand from the proposed driveway. The use of a pipe to provide a stable conveyance from the upper plateau to the lower area eliminates the stresses on the existing steep embankment to convey these flows. (c) The impact of the encroachment(s) on the specific wetland functions and values identified in the field delineation and wetland report is minimized and/or offset by appropriate landscaping, stormwater treatment, stream buffering, and/or other mitigation measures. The significant wetland functions and values identified in the field evaluation of the wetland include surface water protection and erosion control. The project design improves the overall capacity of the wetland to protect surface water and to provide erosion control along the stream. The project will not impact or alter the small stream on the property or the wetland vegetation that is rooted along the stream that helps to stabilize the stream bank. The proposed stormwater system will help control the movement of surface water towards the stream, and is designed to reduce the potential for erosion. As a consequence, the project will reduce the potential for sediments and nutrients to be routed into the stream. The wetland was not found to be significant for wildlife habitat. Factors that contribute to the lack of significant habitat for wetland -dependent wildlife include the surrounding residential development, manipulation of the forested buffer zone, and human manipulation of the vegetation in the wetland, including the apparent removal of woody species, which has impacted habitat diversity and eliminated or reduced cover and feeding habitat for some wetland -dependent wildlife species. Page 2 of 3 Standards for Wetland Protection Narrative Easton, 101 Holmes Road The attached Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan narrative and the Stormwater Management Plan specifically address the existing limitations of the site and the proposed benefits of the improvements. In addition to protecting and enhancing the significant wetland functions, the landscaping plan for the project will improve the quality and type of potential wetland and buffer zone habitat for wildlife and migratory birds. In short, the landscaping plan was prepared with the intent of providing a stabilized environment with the benefit of improving upon the wildlife habitat in the area while also eliminating the monoculture of the area. Easton House Zoning Setback Summary Req'd Lot Size (Ac.) 0_28 Frontage (Ft) Front Yard Setback (Ft) Side Yard Setback (Ft) Rear Yard Setback (Ft) Lake Setback fr 102' cont. Stream Setback (Ft) Wetland Setback (Ft) Building Coverage (Ft) Lot Coverage (Ft) Building Height (Ft) With Conditional Use Appri Building Roof Footprint Garage Roof Footrpint 20 10 30 150 50 50 20% 40% 25 35 Existing 983.66 390.92 1374.58 Existing Proposed 1.07 1.07 176 176 84 62 29 19 87 87 2 3 75 75 9 9 3.0% 4.5% 8.6% 13.6% 22.7 Allowed Proposed 150% 2061.87 2060 Proposed Average Existing Grade Computation Elev Length 109 13 1417 106 21 2226 103.8 9 934 102.8 18 1850 103.5 11 1139 104.5 6 627 105 2 210 108.5 15 1628 112 3 336 113 3 339 114.8 10 1148 115.3 13 1499 115.5 2 231 116 18 2088 116.7 11 1284 116.9 3 351 117A 10 1174 118.5 15 1778 114 8 912 Existing Average Grade 110.8 191 21169 Threshold 120.5 Height above threshold 24.7 Total Height 34.4 I ,Tune 4, 2010 To: From: Tom DiPietro, Stormwater Superintendent Re: Butler Drive Curb Cut Bio-Retention Project Dear Over the past few years, the City of South Burlington has been working collaboratively with a team of water quality professionals to develop a plan to treat stormwater runoff in the Butler Farms and Oak Creek Village neighborhoods. The project team consists of City staff, individuals from the University Of Vermont (UVM) Redesigning the American Neighborhood (RAN) project, professional engineers, hydrologists, and residents in the Butler Farms and Oak Creek Village neighborhoods. After considering many different treatment alternatives, the project team ultimately decided to use a decentralized approach to stormwater management. This approach consists of multiple smaller scale stormwater treatment practices located throughout the neighborhood. This approach allows us to effectively manage and treat stormwater runoff in a cost effective manner. One of the selected stormwater treatment practices is proposed for the area of Butler Drive near your home. I am writing to provide you with information on this project and allow an opportunity for review and comment on the proposed plans. The City is proposing to install curb cut bio-retention cells in the Butler Drive right-of-way near your home. Because this project is located entirely within the City ROW, we are not required to hold a public meeting with the South Burlington Development Review Board. However, we would like to give residents the opportunity to review the plans, ask questions, and provide comment before the plans are finalized. Therefore, with this letter please find a set of engineering plans showing the project location and construction details for the proposed curb cut bio-retention cells. Also included is a photo -simulation that shows what the finished product will look like. Projects of this type have been completed in many different areas throughout the country. Most notably as part of the Street Edge Alternatives (SEA) project in Seattle, Washington and the Green Streets program in Portland, Oregon. While the engineering plans for our project are similar to those that have already been completed, we have taken into account factors unique to the Vermont climate and your neighborhood (i.e. clay soils, snow plowing, freeze/thaw cycles, etc...). We hope that you will find the installation of the curb cut bio-retention cells to be an attractive addition to your neighborhood. If you have questions or comments on the project, please contact me prior to June 25, 2010. I can be reached at (802) 658-7961 x108 or at tdipietrogsburl.com. We would like to begin construction in the late summer or Fall of 2010. 2 SOUTH ELEVATION VENEERS wry= METAL ROOFING 3116" = V-0" s-� N O t^CY n NOP � O V 311E THIN CUT NATURAL STONE VENEER NOTE PATTERN SHOWN IS A2�1 BRAD RABINOWITZ ARCHITECT DESIGN STUDIES: 200 MAIN STREET SURLINGTON. VERMONT3667 EASTON RESID 200 MAIN ST T SOT02 0 ,101 SO "1 BURLINGTON,VERMONT ENCE GRADE 9 WEST ELEVATION DRAWING TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PERMIT REVIEW: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION! A2.1 3116" = r-0" REVISION 01114/10 BRAD RABINOWITZ ARCHITECT 200 MAIN STREET BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05101 802 858 OM t 802 883 B876 f www.b.dmbirwit Rd can - -- --- - - -- ---- --- - PERMIT SUBMITTAL EASTON RESIDENCE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT DRAWING TffLE: BUILDING HEIGHT STUDY A COMPARISON OF THE APPROXIMATE HEIGHTS OF THE NEIGHSORINGHOUSES ON HOUM ROAD AAAY 13, lO DATE REVISION Lam c- k+A.,%A Ft' p- l'j BRAD RABINOWITZ ARCHITECT 658 0430 T 802 863 t www. brad ra bi nowitza rch itect FAKW..,r!zll DETAILS: EASTON RESIDENCE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT V "'TION -TV.."-5-r SUN STUDIES V. = 40'-0" 05/28/10 Wfi*VF1'-J EPUAal-n'7X� ti—i-I SK-1 I BRAD RABINOWITZ ARCHITECT 802 658'114 30 T 802 863 687 \r,fww.b'-,3binowitzarchitect,cod-- %11001 P /F 0)-l"' =4 DETAILS: 1-11, EASTON RESIDENCE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT t4/F t>. IkAA4+61Z Z 4-P 1 4 top �61 W PROJECTION t.e'a-'L- 7V-Jj trr SUN STUDIES 1" = 40'-0" 05/28/10 sK-2 I BRAD RABINOWITZ ARCHITECT tilt: - -------- oov ----o, -dv PIP ON • I Vo of I �ih MM A 1c,#-jc;tv-1E "IX ap,.-7 pc.-OT /11 Po lam GPM $EPTEMB 2 DOW PROJECTION W eat i "NA Site lit = 14-01, DETAILS: EASTON RESIDENCE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT SUN STUDIES 1 " = 40'-0" 05/28/10 SK-3 L A. Y-c- C, 440'm F BRAD RABINOWITZ ARCHITECT 802 658 04-30 -T 802 863 6876 F vv,,tvvv,bradr3 tnbiowitzarchitect.cor- *N% Site ill = 0/pwf DETAILS: EASTON RESIDENCE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT E;l ou'i of IPM DECEMBE 21, HADOW PROJECTION ADOW FROM HILLSIDE IS BROADER THAN HOUSE SHADOW SUN STUDIES 1" = 40'-0" 05/28/10 the extent they have a Part icularized interest that may be affected by theproposed project der the ten criteria. 3. Non-party participants: M The dirt, may 10 oth- n its awn motion or by petition, may allow oth- erstoparticipwith .ateIf the CREATIVE SPACE accorded party s status. 3OX305HARED STUDIO SPACE Summer sublet near Burlington College. High ceilings. No fire. Furnished w/work bench, tables, shelves & parking. $500/mo. 336-407-6024. FARMERS MARKET VENDORS! Farmers Market at Creek Farm Plaza, Colchester. Every Sun. beginning May 3C. Info: Tracey, 864.4908, or go to www,olivesoi[vt.com, ACT 250 NOTICE APPLICATION AND HEAR- ING #4CO893-SR 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-5092 On April 14, 2010, Daniel Fontaine antl Michael Fontaine riled a request for Reconsideration for the District Commission's tlecislon an application #4CO893-5 for a project described as partial find- ings under Criterion 8(A) for a proposed 34 unit residential development located Within the current sand extraction pit. The Project Is located on North Williston Road in the Town of Wllliston. This project will be evaluated at the hearing by the District 4 yEnvironmental Commis- sion n accordance with 10 j V.S.A.§6086(a)(6)(A) and > Act ZED Rule Bal- G ancing Flextii l it y and h. Z natty of Permit Conditions w (Stowe Club Highlands). A public hearingis scheduled for May 27, 2010 at 8:00 a.m. at the Essex to Junction District mace of the Agency of Natural m ReJcues111 Weststreet p Essex Junction, Vermont. N The following people or organizations may parflci- o pate In the hearingfor this project: 1. Statutory parties: The Municipality, the munic!- < l planning commission, Z he regional planning mission, any adjacent municlpallty,munlcipal planning commission or regional planning comms- S,on If the project lantls arelocated on a town boundary, and affected to state agencies are entitled o to party status. H 2. Adjoining property gowners and others: May participate as parties to So If you wish further formation regarding Participation in this hear- ing,please contact the District Coordinator at the address below before the date of the first hearing or Irehearing. If you have a disability for which you are going to need accommo. dation, please notify this office at least seven tlays prior to the above hearing data Copies of the application and plans for this project tellable for Inspection byre y members of the public during regular working hours at the Wi l llston Offices, the Crittenden County Regional Planning Commission Office, and the District #4 Environ. ental Office. The applica- tion can also be viewed at the Natural Resources Board web site: www,nm. state.vt.us/lup by clicking on "District Commission Cases- and entering the case number above. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 21st day of April, 2010. for the specific order In which itemswll) be heard Burlington Pmposed Downtown TIF District City Council Meeting Notice —June 7, 2010 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Burlington City Count! will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 7, 2010 at 7:00 pm In the Contois Auditorium, City Hall, Church Street to Consider the following: Resolutlon to establish and create the Downtown Tax Increment Finance (TIF) District within the Designated Downtown, and to submit an ap- plication to the Vermont Economic Progress Count! (VEPC) to approve the TIF District pursuant to 24 YEA §1892, which wit I enable the City to incur indebtedness to be repaid through the retention of future Incremental State and City property tax re. ceipts In support of public iofrastructure Invest. ants as identified In the TIF District Plan. Copies of the proposed TIF District PI an and other support) ng materials areavailablefor review In the tammunity and Economic Develop. ment Office, City Hall, Roam 32, during normal buslnesehours. FIRE PROTECTION AND PREVENTION - InstallMlon and MainW- By:/s/Peter E. Keibel That Chapter 13, FIre Protection antl Prevention, Peter E. Keibel archer Code of Ordinances Natural Resources Board of he City of Burlington District .4 Coordinator Ill West Street be and hereby is amended by amending Sec. 13-54 Essex Junction, VT 05452 thereof to read as foil ows: T/802.879.5658 Sec. 13-54. Installation and E/ pefer.keibel®statemt.us maintenance, BURLINGTON DEVELOP. MENTREVIEW BOARD Tuesday June 1, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The Burlington Develop- ment Review Board will hold a public hearing on Tuesday June 1, 2010 at 5:Cop— in Contois Auditorlum, City Hall to consider the following applications: 1.10-0881CA/CU; 60 South Crest Drive (RL, Ward 5) Bruce Baker Construct addition to xisting duplex to add one living unit. 2. 10.0885AP: 445 South Union Street (RL Ward 6) Gisele Thibault Revocable Trust Appeal of Notice of Viola- tion *195874 far expanded parking area. Plans may be viewed In the Planning and Zoning office, (City Hall, 149 Church Street Burlington), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. This may not be the final order In which Items will be heard at the meeting. Please view the final Agen- da, at www aburlington. vtus/planning/orb or Posted on the Planning and Zoning Office notice rd, one week before the hearing The cost of apy connec. ton to the municipal fire alarm system, as well as ail other costs due to the Installation of any master box, shall be borne by the party Installing the system. All Installation and maintenance work on a master box and/or alarm system shall be performed by state -licensed fire term Installers and shall be subject to the approval ofthe fire marshal, An Initial connection fee of $458 $=shall be paid to the City hy.the owner of the property upon which the master boxer alarm system Is Installed for the computer program- ming and signal strength testing by the Clty's alarm technician which is required to connect the Master Ratlie Call Box (MRCS) to the Burlington Emergency Communica. Lion Center (BELL), A re- programming fee of $150 shall be paid by the owner for any modification to an existing MRCS that re- quiresreprogramming and testing by the Cltys alarm technician. Anyadditlpnal work required on the MRCS system other than those specified in the Citys alarm technician's MRCB programming guide shall be subject to a charge of $75/hr of the Citys alarm techolcian's time. It shall be the property owners responsibility to maintain RCW 26. 33.310 regarding 802-383.1234 proposed Public Transit tion of the Power of Sale the master box on his the above named children, 802-383.124'(FAX) Program with Transit serf- contained In a certain premises in working condi- whose parents are Patricia bmason@c—Prg vice to Chlttenden County mortgagegivenbySov- tionandgoodrepairatall Lee Thurston Burbo, and Commuter service ereign Bank to Matthew times. mother and Kenneth NOTICE to Franklin, Addison. and J. Cohen dated December Material stricken out David Burbo Jr, father of Washington Counties. 9, 2002 and worded in deleted -Material Mishaya; Karl Edwin Clark, The Crittenden South Volume 102, Page 171 of underlined fatherof Alyssa. Supervisory Union, Projects are tlescribetl as the Land Records ofthe added. composed of Allen Brook follows: State Operating Townof Wastford,ofwhich (FOR FURTHER INFORMA- SchOol,Charlotte Central fun dsiotheamountof mortgage the undersigned IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED TION, CALL 206-720-3293, School, Hinesburg Com- $1,682, 695: STP Preven- Is the present holder, for by the City Count i l of 8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.) munity School, Shelburne tive Maintenance funds In breach Clore conditions of th a City of Burlington, Community School, the amount of$1,795,878; said mortgage and for the as follows: That Chapter Said Petition will be heard Wlll iston Central School, Federal Job Accessantl purposes cfforeclosing 13, Fire Protection and on June 24,2010, at the and Champlain Valley Reverse Commute (JARC) the same will be sold at Prevention, of the Code of hour of 8:15 a.m., at King Uni on H igh School, hereby Funds in the amount of Public Auction at 12:30 Ortllnan[es of the City of County Superior Court pravitle the following $256,800; State Jab P.M. on June 8, 2010, at Burlington be and hereby Juvenile Department 401 notice in compliance with Access and Reverse 1102 Old Stage Road P/k/a is amended by amending 4th Ave North, Kent WA 40 CFR Part763.93(g)(3) Commute (JARC) funds in Reynolds Road, Westford, the proposed Ordinance before a judge ofthe above AHERA: Asbestos Manage- the amount If$256,800; Vermont all and singular Amendment of Sec. 13.54 entitled court at which ment Plans are available Rural Technical Assistance the premises described in approved by the Ordinance time you are directed to atachools. Program(RTAP) funds in said mortgage: Committee on February 9, appear and answer the the amount of$3,000: 2010 and refereed back to sa ltl petition or the pet!. M.y4,2010 Congestion Mitigation Air To Wit: the City Council for Second tion will be granted and Quality Marketing funds In Being all and the same Reading and Adoption to action Will be taken by the PUBLIC HEARING the amount of$50,000; lands and premises additionally Include we court such as she l l appear SOUTHBURIJNGTON Congestion Mitigation Air conveyed to Matthew J. amendment of Sec. 13-58 to be for the welfare ofthe DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Quality Operating funds in Cohen by Warranty Deetl thereof to mad as follows: said chiltlren. BOARD the amount of$739,778; of Morton H. Reynolds Sec. 13-5B. Annual fee. Federal 5310/5311/5309/ dated August 29,1979 An annual fee shall be Dated May 6,2010. The South Burlington De- STP Capital funds in the and recorded In Book 53, charged to the property velopment Review Board moun[af $1,111,634; Page 348-349 ofthe Land owner In the amount of BARBARA MIN ER wlllholdapubli[hearing and State Capital Match Records ofthe Town of few fla hundred fifty KING COUNTY In the South Burlington funds In the amount of Westford. The face page dollars 1$468,89 Sj$O,OjI,) SUPERIOR COURT CLERK City Hall Conference Room, $338,954. of this deed was originally for each master box con- BY: BLB, Deputy Clerk 575 Dorset Street, South recorded In Book 42. Page to the necM. !This Burlingf Vermont on Persons desiring a hearing 169 of the Land Record s of I. M. alarm System. ThIS ystem. INVITATION TO BID Tue of o be heltl should submit the Town of Westtoltl. charge will be assessed 730 Ph. he written requests to the and collected annually, The Chlttenden South following: Chittentlen County Trans- Terms of Sale: $10.000.00 due In pro raa amount Supervisory Union. herein portation Authority and to be paid in cash by upon the effective date of called the Owner, invites 1. Preliminary plat applica- to the Vermont Agency pure aseratthetlmeof this alvlslon and the frst separate sealed bids for a tion#SO-10-16 of Algim- of Transportatlonaf[he sale, with the balance due day oflulythereafter . An GAS CONVERSION project amasand NeringaShaine addresses below withinl4 atclosing. Proofoffinanc- adminlstrative charge for their school In Hines- to subdivide a 39,4505f days of publication ofthls ingfor lhebalanceofthe and/a( Interest shall be burg Vermont. parcel Into three (3) lots of notice. Upon a receipt of purchase to be provided a ssed for payments not approximately equal size, a request, a date will be at the time of sale, The ecel ved with n thirty (30) Bid documents wl l l be Highland Terrace, scheduled anda notice of sale is Subject to taxes due days of the invol ce from available upon request hearing will be published. and owing to the Town of the department Service from the project engineer 2. Conditional use applica- A copy of the proposal may Westford. Cal is by the fire marshal or owner. A bidder site tlon#CU-10-06of Marga- beseenattheProjectCo- duringnormalworking visit a no walkth rough is ret Novotny to amend a animator Office. Persons The mortgagor is entitled hours shal lbe included schedu led for May 19 at 3 previously approved plan all ring to make written to redeem the premises at In [his charge. Failure pm, Additional Site review for a 9,8005fgemral office comments shoultl forwartl any time prior to the sale to pay the annual Pees antl walkthrough maybe building, The amendment same to the adtlresses by paying the full amount In the time required is arranged by the bidder by consists of converting below within 14 days of due under the mortgage, violation punishable under contacting the school to 4,410sf to social services publication of this notice. Including the costs and section 13-11 amended arrange a site visit before use, 72 Ethan Al len Drive. A copy of the appl lcatlon expenses of the sale. 04/26/10 LO bids are due. Copies of the for the Federal grants may lstreading: 01/25/10: Request for Proposal an 3. Conditional use tap- be seen at the Project Other terms [obean. referretltothe0rdinance bid documents canbeob p0ca[ion#CU-10-07 of Managers Office. noun [ed at the Sale or Committee amed at the office of GW Kathleen and Thomas Inquire at Lobe &Fortin, 2nd reading: C4/26/10 Engineering, PC; (Bill® Easton to: 1) reconstruct Transit Provider: 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306, Action: adopted GWRengi neermg.com) or a single family dwelling South Burlington, VT Date; 04/26/10 from Bob Mason at the and increase Its footprint Chittentlen County Trans- 05403.802 660-9000. Published: OS/OS/10; le- CSSU officesh Shelburne by 50%, and 2) allow the poration Authority published 05A2/10 (802) 3B3-1234. height of the reconstruct. 15 Industrial Parkway DATED at South Burling- Effective:05126/10: Bltl Due Oateis June2, ad structure to exceed Burlington, VT 05401 ton, Vermont this 6th day actual effective date now: 2010 at 11: 00 A. M. at the the 25 foot height limit by of May, 2010. 06/02/10 Office ofthe Supeion- 9.4ft for a total height of State Agency: tendent of5chools. 34. 4 f. 101 Holmes Road. Vermont Agency of Trans- Sovereign Bank IN THE SUPERIOR COURT c/o Chittentlen South portation OFTHE STATEOF WASH- Supervisory Union, 5420 John Dlnklage, Chairman Public Transit Section By: Jpsnom B. Lobe, Esq. INGTON IN AND FOR Shelburne Road. Suite South Burlington Develop- 1 National Life Building Lobe &Fortin, PLC THE COUNTY OF KING, 300, Shelburne, Vermont ment Review Board Montpelier VTO5633- 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306 JUVENILE DEPARTMENT 05482. Verbal and 5001 South Burlington, VT Facsimile quotes will not Copies ofthe applications 05403 IN RETHE DEPENDENCY heaccepted. Bldsmust are available for. public Dated at Burlington, OF: be sealed. This is a public Inspection at the South County of Chittentlen. STATEOFVERMONT Mishaya Ann Burbo bid opening. Questions Burlington City Hall. State of Vermant this 6 CHITTENDENCOUNTY,SS. Thurston should be directed a Bob day of May, 2010. CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR DOB: 06-22.04 Mason and concurrently May12,2010 COURT Alyssa May Clark Thurston copied to Bill Root and by Aaron Frank DOCKET NO. S0727-09 OIC DOB: 03-08.99 email, facsimile arm writ- PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Director of Planning and rig. Answers to questions FUNDING Program Development Wells Fargo Bank. N.A., NO: 10-7.02008-8KNT 10-7-02009-BKNT will be provided via email, facsimile or in writing and NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC HEARING STATEOFVERMONT Plaintiff V. conveyed to all bidders CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Edward P. Myers, Colleen NOTICE OF HEARING The Owner reserves The Chittentlen County CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR Myeref/k/a Calleen the rlghtto waive any Transportation Authority COURT M. Roberts, William TO: Patricia Lee Thurston informality in, or reject gives notice that pursuant DOCKET NO. SOISS-09 CnC Harry Pelkey, Colleen May Burbo, mother; Kenneth any or al l bids. No bidder to 49 U. S.C.§5310 Capital Pelkey, NorthCountry David Burbo Jr, fatherof maywithdmwhis bid for Elders& Persons with Sovereign Bank Federal Credit Union, Mishaya; Karl Edwin Clark, within 45 tlays; Saturday, Disabilities Program; Plaintiff United States of America father of Alyssa, and/or Sunday and legal holidays 49 U.S.C.§5311 Non- V. Secretary of Housi ng and anyone claiming parental/ excluded, after the bid Urbanized Area Formula Mathew J. Cohen, Urban Development State paternal rights orinterest opening, Program for Preventive Colchester Community ofVeunont Department in the children and to All Dated this 7th day of May, Maintenance Program and Development Corporation of Taxee. Burlington News Whom It May Concern: 2010 by: Rural Technical Assistance And Occupants residing at Agency, Unifun CCR Part - Program; State Operating 1102 Old Sage Road ners And Occupants resid- You are hereby notified Bob Mason, Chief Opera- Assistance Program; f/Wa Reynolds Road, West- ing at 126 Hedgerow Drive that on Apri15, 2010. a Lions Officer Congestion Mitigation Air ford, Vermont f/k/a7 Hedgerow Drive, petition for Termination of Chlttenden South Supervi- Ouality Program; 49 U.S.C. Defendants Shelburne, Vermont Parent -Child Relationship sory Union § 5316 Job Access and Re- Defendants was filed In the above 5420 Shelburne Road, verse Commute Program, NOTICE OF SALE entitled Court pursuant Suite 300 the opportunity is offered NOTICE OF SALE to RCW 13.34.080 and/or Shelburne. VT 05482 for a public hearing on a Byvirtueandinexecu- SE -VIEW APRIL 15 12" = V-0" BRAD RABINOWITZ ARCHITECT 20U MAIN 61 RE 1 B(JKLING ION V 1 802 658 0430 T 802 863 6876 F www.bradrabinowitzarchitect.com DETAILS: EASTON RESIDENCE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT SOUTHEAST VIEW V.3 12" = 1'-0" APRIL 19, 2010 Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan • • _ J -- -- - -- W SITE ENGINEER: Existing Conditions - The existing conditions at the site generally includes a lack of • • • •:-: y y - •• subcanopy vegetation due to the lack of light reaching the ground. Mature hemlocks ..' • • I� C� located along the south embankment cut off light all year round. The presence of theseNATURAL _- trees have also suppressed any significant vegetative cover on the ground along the top ... % :-:-: •:'. •:- E R A TI ON ILIy W Portions and slopes of the embankment area. V E N / ` � "�\' �' y Stormwater from Holmes Road and the residential use flows northwesterly to the top :7t }I OA_ D A A y `1' �' `f' `I' `I' u' 1$� `1' �l' 1x••� CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC and down the embankment slopes down to the wetland below. - - - I '� O 1'� (gMAISRELDVKWWYE, SOUM BIMLINGTON, lT 05/IXi Basis of Design - The proposed riparian corridor restoration plan for the Easton property C �A� A • Z• y y y W 1 �• `-z F-��1 weD' '.wa'.raaK�,,, utilizesthe design recommendations ofthe United States Department of Agriculture •�•aP'OtiD.'N.'.R Natural Resources Conservation Service. ................L'A.YY.. corvruc '.'.'.�'�.`. •.'.•� DRAIrN This restoration Plan focuses on three primary goals. •• (�,'-•-: -: -'-•-�- `L 70/ `L `L `1' `1, `LI `Y �L �L y y y y' � I y y ACL 1. Stormwater filtering ;:;. C'i. ; ; ••;.;�:�:•- . - - - - = ASH 8" ASH 8" ASH 16" 2. Wildlife Habitat creation ' ,. .. - y y NV W .L .l' 1 .L .L .y 3. Site Stabilization ��' ,•{2%\; _ \\ ASH 8" 1 DSM Secondary benefits of the proposed restoration program include: restoration of riparian ' •.� �) y �' - `%' `i' .wexoveD plant communities, providing a source of detritus and large woody debris and increasing _�ipp1~;��.\••. ` •, 2 OL DSM carbon storage. ' ' •ti.$' • ', OWNERS: Wetland Augmnetation - Due to the lack of sunlight there is little if any vegetation with _ '.!„ \:':'.':'.'. • • %.��Y.; �Y �L �L \ �Y �Y �L .L .L �Y .L any signifirant wildlife benefit. There is no significant cover or feed available. The / _ _ - :�. • • `� •: • _ WALL- - ,�,'. \ removal of the hemlocks from the south embankment will open this area up to enable �• •;•;•.,•- •'•••-•' ems:• •�`• •T \. .\• }���-6 • • \.. •Q' ,. .y \ ASH more beneficial wetland species to be introduced or to regenerate within the is area. r.'. .� - <'I��. c�• , ,' J The reposed planting Ian rovidesthemomentumtorestorev etationfavorablefa •%• ••-'•v'•'•'•'. • . . EWPLI THOMAS R. & P Po P 9P P e9 .;.�. - - K \..'.E:AINI�1.'.'. ..-'_'.\. •.l'. _- wildlife cover and feed.. Natural regeneration from seeds distributed from introduce �.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' �.'. • IL E y y' plantings and those further described below in the Zone 1 and 2 management areas will - - - • KATHLEEN H. lBad to a more vibrant and diversified community. - + + + + + 1':':' '• '• •� Followingthe guidelines of the NRCS a three zones stem in the non wetland area was - + + + + + + + + + ., ° J developed. J • . • �. - 't• �. + + + + + - _ �RAMP.•1• n .�. SASH 6 + + 4 + EASTON merit Zone 1 -this is located immediate) adjacent to the wetland itself and ^'t `�' • • • •' • • "S - ` � - � Manage Y 1 represents the transition from facultative wetland species to facultative upland species. _ _ _ •� "/' '•'� �' 11 This zone was split u into an eastern portion closest to the retained hemlock trees + + - ::- -: _ -.� . • . ;f :.�'.;�. `1!'�:. :.:..W...:. . "•V�"• •. '`i'' `L r `1' W `I' which will continue to experience significant shading and a western portion which will _ _ rovide a new subcano habitat * + + +- sir + - - - �. • - . . . . •-- -,h PROJECT - provide PY + ,+ 4 + + + R 1.. .. . . .... _ . .Vr . y.'.'..'.' 7 + J + -+ + + + + Plantings in this area are carefully chosen to provide improved wildlife habitat while also - '.''.'. recognizing the seasonal saturation of the soils at the base of the embankment due to + +^'T +• (i,+ + + + + + \ •.'.'. •.'.'.'.r • _.- / � � �L�+ � / � �T5 / + + + + + + + + + 4 �'' a ' .. groundwater seeps. + + + + + f +/ + .kY-•s �� !A _ �` + -- -i '• / ....:.r:".: .. / + + + �r + + + tFr Yv �}j�-b + - :::.'::.'.''r.: EASTON PROPERTY Between the shrub and tree plantings, a mixture of warm and cool season grasses, + + + + / + + + + + - ' - ,,6� h� further modified to achieve the recommended seeding rates and types for the binding of / � � - - .� -• _ . ��;;:�;.���:: � � SITE PLAN the slopes (set forth by the State of Vermont Erosion Control Manual) was chosen to ... •. •. •. •..�..` � �" •- _ T provide Initial cover. These grasses provide Important cover and browse material for %- • _ • _ -+ + + + + + - +� - -- - - ` _ J"-' wiltllite in support of the goals of augmenting the otherwise existing homogenous .;.'�; - - ' ' - ' + .i - + + + \ �. Q - \ _ - -- _ `� "• - / environmental. ;:l.. + + + + + •� 7 � •' • 101 HOLMES ROAD +! " ENT. � � • ' ''•' � � L r provide divers) and to avoid wholesale loss of cover, a mixture of at least In order to p o de diversity %+ + + + + \ - _ _ -' \ - SOUTH BURLINGTON five(5)different species is employed in each management zone. •;••;•; •; + + + + +` 120 -fJ�� T"-.;...,_.;.'^' VERMONT Base don the NRCS recommendations, Shrub community plantings were placed on •. • .. _ _ _ _ - -' _ \ \ - - - - _ - _ - _ _ - 10-foot to 12-foot spacing while the tree community areas are to be planted with 12-foot • •' •' • •' ' •' •' •rTTAI IN �•:' ' ' - c , \ \ \\� _- to15-fcotspacings. .......•.:'W L-:T:FiW':-••••'••'•'.� 4++ - _ \ \�. --- - �.'- —115— Management Zone 2 - This represents the upland portion of the riparian corridor. This .j 7,"-.Q ' ' • / ' ' / - - _ _ - "- - - - - zone was also broken u into eastern and wester portions with the eastern portion beingCe �''•f ' - + subject to shade and partial sun conditions while the western portion would be subject to +_.'�-•- sun and partial sun conditions. The plantings chosen for this area took into account the �(o+FR LL S I -' -" - + + + •:� + - - - - - - - - %•, • <:-:-• • • • •,j - - �I,ea� dryer soil conditions and offered high to very high wildlife habitat value due to a Q j + Ea ' ' ' ` \ _ .. • ' .. `.�.. •.' �°�. combination of cover and feed opportunities in addition to the sun light availability. w (J I + •..•�••'••'•• — —_ ®^►, ©:.;.;..: i 4' w/ ASH 10"I .;.•.;.;..j + + �.-.•.•.•.•.•.•.•. . Plant materials such as elderberry and dogwoods were chosen to limit the \ / ••-tA_�li�-.':'..• '�' ' T.'•- :-:;.;:• M encroachment of invasive species during initial grow -in of this area. / ( �� ' • •=,-,• • • • : • . • • �/ k® ':•: y r.'.'.•.':•:' .•.1. ..... Similar to Zone 1, this management area will also benefit from the seedingof the site '' �y. ' ' ' ' _ - ' ' / _ with the wildlife and soil stabilization grasses between the proposed shrub and tree ••�•••I•------ C 9 P Pos ( ..... ... . plantings. 1 0'::•.•a•.:._.•.•.'_.'.•..•.•.•.'.•..•.•.'.-.'7•.' •..�.-..... NCRESE / ••4• O MO BEAM f oID Management Zone 3 - This zone represents the primary means of filtering runoff from / • • / •. •. •. - \ QR� V / / ...... \ PAL / COTTQNIN D the residential use and transportation corridor. The grass types chosen for this zone / -I \ GR / / located along the top of the embankment provide both nutrient uptake as well as habitat / .� -. - - • • ��� \ - - / • • 2-2 • • - / benefits through improved cover characteristics. This area is not to be mowed and is / -Y. . . . / protected with a spilt rail fence to keep residential uses from creeping into the riparian / �' �� • • • • • • / corridor area. \ / �/� / \ •- �1 / These grasses are similar to those used in Zones 1 and 2 except that the addifional / ^D 1 t application of Switchgrass and Love grass has been cut back where steep slopes are / •'o' .' �I L Q�x' •' ZONES 1-3 SLOPE SEEDING / not present. . LEGEND SEED MIX RATE \ �' / I •. p �•r 1 / .'.\.'.'.'.'. \ F} • •H.. ..�i. • • • DAM CBBC® N8Y®ON BIG BLUESTREAM 6 Ibs/Ac _ _ _ / a'•'•'•'•' I _ • • • • f- INDIANGRASS 6 Ibs/Ac . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 PROPOSED CONTOUR / J a .-... " .-"-.- .'Z \.. . .•.•. DEERTONGUE 6 Ibs/Ac / \ ::': ;::Jl ...'....'- .. . . . . . SMTCHGRASS 8 Ibs/Ac 1 . . . . .I. / APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE ...y�'.'.'.'.�.'.'.'.'.' SAND LOUEGRASS 4 Ibq Ac _ QS SEWER MANHOLE 30 Ibs/AC -� O / -..'..-•Q..-. /.'. .-.'.'.-.'.Lt11'ILY .'.- .i!.'.' .. 'wry HYDRANT ZONE�'-3.NON-SLOPE SEEDING`.•:':•:•:•:•:' :.:...:.::::::::::::::. f ./oT� _.. ............... BIG BLUESTREAM 6 Ibs/Ac O ® srlur-oFF SEED MIX RATE - - r- GAD- TCHGRASSPOWER POLE INDIANGRASS 6 Ibs/Ac - ;;;.--------—DECIDUOUS TREES TO BE RETAINED Ik DEERTONGUE 6Iba AC _.� - I�-_SwI4 Ibs/Ac _ L / __ - -- _ _ /' H__ _ LANDSCAPING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE RETAINED 30 Ibs Ac ZONES 4 LAWN SEEDING _ _____-- o�—�--I�� EXIST. FENCE SEED MIX RATE ---- _ / - - °flit-- ---------------- �_-_---_ `\ \ WETLAND DELINEATION CREEPING RED FESCUE 15 Ibs/Ac c r - / PLAN PERRENIAL RYE GRASS 20 Ibs/Ac __ _ -------------- STREAM- _ - - - - CENTERLINE KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 10 Ibs Ac 1 _ = _ _ sNRutas nrtoucNT WILDLIFE REDTOP Common Name) (Sdendfic Name) _ NUMBER_ SIZE _ TYPE ZONE _TOLERANCE VALUE SUN 47 Ibs/Ac — �� 1 St SeMceBemy, Dowry Amelanch rborea 1 8 - B Balled Root 1 m 2 Lev Hi Sun/Partial sh ZONE 1-WETLAND/UPLAND TRANSITION /'+ s2 SeroceBeny. Swamp Amelanch adensi: 2 6' - N Balled Rod tar 2 Low High Sun Pertiel BANK STABILITY, DETRITUS, RETAIN NUTRIENTS GNIP 21 \ 83 Dogvood, Redosier Comus sencea 3 6' - B. Belled Rod 1 Low High Partial 1 S4 Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 3 6- 8' Belled Rod 1 Moderate High Sun ZONE 2 -UPLAND SLOPE PLANTINGS _ - - + - \ 85 Hazelnut, Beaked Cory us comate 6 6' - B' Balled Rod 1 or 2 Moderate High Sun/Partial DATE DRA1nNG NUMBER SLOPE STABILITY, FILTER RUNOFF, SOFT EDGE TRANSITION - I I \ s6 Dogwood Grey comus racemosa 5 6'- B Balled Rod 1 or 2 Moderate High Sun/Partial FEB..2O1O ZONE 3 -GRASS ERBAREOUS FILTER STRIP. TREES GRAPHIC SCALE sc.r. SLOW AND FILTER RUNOFF , : ^^ Ti .Maple, Red Acermbmm 1 5'-e Balled Root 1 Low High PertiaUShaaa I — T2 Cherry, Choke Prunus Nrg Tana 1 5' - 6' Belled Rod 2 Moderate Very High Sun 1 " = 10° L ZONE 4 -MAINTAIN LAWN AREA _ _ '" - "f., `" ; '` ° w' 77 Hemlock, � - Ts ga, can dens s 1 s - G Bailed Rod 2 Lev 4igh She& o s o _ - T4 Oak Bur O ercus m arpe 1 5' - 6• Balled Rod 2 High High Sun/Partial RRou. No. •1 ( IN FEET) T5 I Birch, Yell Betula allegh ensis 1 5' - 6' Balled Root 1 or 2 Moderate ,Jh SuNPartiel 09222 I laoh = 10 1t. PLAN REFERENCES xk/li I \ \ A. "Plat of Survey - T.R. & K.H. Easton" prepared by Civil EngihLip I \ \� Associates, dated November24, 2009. I\1\IIII B. "Plan of Land of Maurice Boisvert" prepared by Trudell Concur§\\� Engineers, Inc. dated January 5, 1978, last revised Septemb, 'Its l4 �� \\ V \ \ recorded in Map Slide 124-2 of the Town of South Burlington Land.\ Records. C. "Plan of Utility Easement" prepared by Civil Engineering Associatellt,I I 111 dated March 2004 recorded in Map Slide 434-1 of the Town of Southi II 1 `+\\ i (' on l I I I I OWNERS OF RECORD r I 1 Thomas R. & Kathleen H. Easton / ? \; \ \ \ \ \ 1 I 135 Covington Lane\\\\\\\�� 1 \ 1 Shelburne, Vermont 05482-6656 Deed References: I'� ;1/ Volume 772, Page 497 "Camp Lot" 31.07acres11V111�1�1 j I I ; „; ,•, .•.'.'a \\\ �Y. s!• �•;.. .`rA V v 11 II I, 1 1' 1 I V AV, ',� 11 A11i1VAIL\ \ �/ \ \ \ \ \ L ' • �•' • �' C .,..,� 1 1 I � T' esi shown do not ort taco or all utilities located upon / % \ \\ \ ', t:.:.:::_.`.•...`.•.•:-:•:•:•:•:•f ....;�� � I A. fi w bem �itvt� �BjNe � Po 1 iJ nt to the surve remiss. ¢x s n uff l�is are a roximate on /��\ \ \.\`� �\\`\ ` .•.•. .I•':•j-c': lro�•\\ \ \I1i 1 rlfra �ll' ,ylcarwlcts. l Frepanclasshalll>e reported I / \ a.. ' �.'.'.'. •. T C btor Shell field ver all till I I / \!/ `/-• \\\ \\ \\\ 4�uz:`••: ^��T�•• •C�.�^ •• � \I\\111'\dopsletrl ngirlcaorer.( The Contmq\r sh�`11 capMat Dig Sdfe\I g8J44-7233)prW to any i 1 1.'..•.h1il:\ \\\ \ 11 1 I I \\'� \ \ II I I 1 \III\ 1 \ \ \ = � - - - _ - - - _ ' K 1. "� ) \ ,\ \4, \ kc al d91tum NAVD88 ektebli�ned trbJn GPS blal ons perlorm(3d st✓itlr , I a 1 \ \ 1Tli)nbl 47b0 Hus/ quency rebeiveks ul} hg the t�i�o� hoc survey. 1 \ \ \ �\ \ ~ -. \ •\ \ \ \'� 1 \ 1 I }tii I a) i note bounds serve land riot inten / / I be be d as ne. I \ 1 \ A)N 11 1 1 1 1 ! II /w. f }obgrty liln� infokmation for 10i HollYtes11'�'b d is `_%1yepJ ldri Reference plan +A" . \ / jF I II ISe� bbftr�nge \Plen A for lutther agtsM orpl t `/nnab# s end monumentalion. \1 �F�I 111111 11 v I 1' u n1'r !' 1� �? I� _�. \ \/�r\�-_//r �� ' /� _ I 1 � I� //// //�•ttal II \IIII\ Ill\111 `\I\\\ 1 I\ �" I/ ` \ \_'% (\� \ - /-` JI/ I � � I /: •�.•.I i I\ IIII\ 1 1 111 1 \\ ` I' I I / II I \ / I , '------ - -- / 1 '�/- ----- - -- •_,v v •./ 1 I 1 i%.l ` r i. 11 �� • ,I IJ II II � I'I 11 II 11 I \I i 1 �rl� \III - - - - - - - ` I V / I 1 ' / \ \ I - - - /'._`___^_ / 'i• / - \ �(I - - - - -- / / / /--''•., �� I I /ILA \ �\\ .\ 1 1 \\\\\ � � �^• _�__-l' �i \ , / , //�___�•. \• I I I' I I 1 I \I t /y� 11�120%O ` '•i,, �.` ,` / // J 1 lti k.� � — � — — ^ •i' -� `'--.! �--_--_/ J�..,\ I I I I I I I \• I i I 1 l �\ `'"(•-_-�___+---�--1"-_�-Y-�'�"�--=--------_�_\\ i — ^ ` — — — — --� �--_ ''- / ll / �ff.'.. \�1y I I � I I 1 \ v I 6 \ \ \ I t LE - s - '- _Mn FROM L•B-0ELjryERBON_ \ ` -� - - - - _ _ _ _ / // 1\ : "� �' � ' ' 1 I I I \ ! `'� n a :�•\\ \ D.II.1`FA—LtTn-- _ _ ,,LYOF\SOU1 1$�1�Y61NGTON \ WF.TIl,g9;-_� \ i ` / I lf�j �• 11\' I I I 11 I \ I1 P 90n \ / I \ ••� �`••--.---- --_ �eP�G �///��• .t. '•j•'I I 'k I (III I I I l � � •yr•.F-�'•'( � r; �;�.._.-.:•....�..t•....-`..i._s.ti s.` `--� �t'• � / / �� A� `•y: : /J \ _\ %,.��=J.^1`�t ��si'. /'� s-�.tia�-••^.._.....ems• f_x". �: :'r 7.�J.''ar'•'•'•' 1 / //// �/ I I I I I I \ _4\ 1 .7:""--',-"-.� f:. . . . ::''.....'.' :��.:.`:. G�ti.:. ��:a:"K•••••'�:•:•:�'�'.:. •"/�Ti_�_�� �_ _ :: ..: .:ar.^, J �u i8�lsY& FY�V1 ErIFEI • y1 / �LI ON FR \ Fl C.'�•�•-l'-' 1 -•�.' ' •(• .Q!'•:..i / PTH §URLINtTON� ,-WE • .. .. '.. f / '1� l J ! t ..1. An. �'. �0.\. .'.mot'::-.. •;i v .\ 3.110AHER.'.'.'.:\'.QF4T.OPFtIPARIAN�l. .'. �.Jr ///i/�' / !' / \ \\\ \ ��`.� - / / , / .`✓ r i ' - >. _C•'-� �.\ E_S'>;lTV R'.' '.:j'.'�'f'' ' /i'/// i' '// /' �I \ \\\III -'-. •'''�-� �// // �.____J..._ - l ,. .0 .� ' ' ' ' DOR.ICAODI '10N _ / / // /�i/ / \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / �j , . _ / , •.,y/ `•', / ' - II / 'g� pGAa/ 1 / 14KL'' l I T. & K. STON ' CHAMPLAIN, -' 101 HOLME OAD - .7 ��lt - --Is AVE/SS1[MN- ,- I 1 IIII �1\ •,_ - r /° � �� i —• D.IIN FARREL(=-frost Jnp� fI > \, IIII(II 1k7UK / r� iil�i/l i / I / /J1 i lii' I' r / r LARDSCA_RNMIOLAN. :4 • ' / � ��' '/'. , I I \ \ . I;/ / / _ 1 ----1 / --- �;.!•:� l.....�r i7f.'.'' •jy// ��%ii' %� - I \I I I I \ \ ••:-: fir.'. / / / _ _ �'' -- - _ i i .r'i.. \ J �`�'�s•tK.;1'.'j'/%/�///,%//'� // 1 ISVERT& l I / I' I . .. /I/ /'/-- _ — = % 1 _ - 1�----- '. E•.: „• :.:'.�`//�////.% / D.TWITCHELL 1 II I `l\ _- / 1 I I ! /� ��!- _ iPei \\ RR I \) \\\ 1 ••r_, __ i � /// / l� I � /\ __ -- �f'" � \ Icy � I \ ��iV60E-IN EATON FROM 1\\ _GTYZ�F SOUTH BJdf�LINGTON 1 _- I _ _L�-.- - \ \ I ',\ I'., 1 I 1 1 - n In I INLAT r1N , __.,ram'•"' ` -1V IIII 1 \ \ III I \\\ LEGEND 1, EXISTING IGONTOUR =�A7ROXIMATE PROPERTY YNE — —SS— — GRAVITY SEWER LINE — — W — — WATER LINE —OE/OT- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC/TELEPHONE —ST— — STORM DRAINAGE LINE A AI ® SEWER MANHOLE HYDRANT ® SHUT-OFF ' lla, POWER POLE I — / RAPHIC SCALE\\ CLASS III WETLAND EXIST. FENCE `vV �1 � •n / W FEET50 ) \ — 11' rG — WETLAND DELINEATION �/\/---- STREAM CENTERLINE SITE ENGINEER: r CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC• f0 MV15 RD NEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT OM 802-80 E3a3 F— EpP-0N-a wsD: Wxw.ns-M.com DRA," GAC CRECEED DSM APPROVED DSM OWNERS: THOMAS R. & RATHLEEN H. EASTON PROJECT: EASTON HOUSE 101 HOLMES ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT zrj_R�oJECTI LOCATIONI " LOCATION MAP RMSION LOCATION SITE PLAN 0.11E DRADING NUNDRR FEB., 2010 1" g 50' C_ 1 nor. N0. 09222 NTS I _ I � � \���.--------------- I! W W W W W W W W W W \ W y y y W W y W 3 W� _ — -. ���I '� \\ \\ SITE ENGINEER: I' W W W W W W W W W W W W \�-�.;�. :r-�.� _-, _--------------_.'NOTES \ W y y W W W W W •Y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W + \4 \ I \ utilities shown cdo not purport to cPnsthute or represent all uNldies located upon \\ r !! W\ W W W W W W y W W V W W W W W t/11' W W W W W W W W W W J Br d�e cent to t,e surveyed premises, Existing utility locations are approximate only. N{ W W W W W W W W W W The C�h4actor shall field verity BY utility conflicts. All discrepancies shall be reported \ \ /� ` W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W \\ W W W W W /,If the,,Engir�eer. The Contractor sliall contact Dig Sate (888-344-7233) prior to any W W W y y cODstruc#on. / CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIA7E5. ING fOMAAISFIELO NEW LANE, SOUTH BMWNGTON, VT 05/03 2 Vertic I datum�,ZC NAVD�s�blished from GPS observations performed with 1',676 / fre Uency reservers �in�pogrepH. surrey. B02-0a1-2323 FAx Bp26eF22]1 xaD. wxw.psM.edn O \ WT ACL 3. "`7hls flan islnot a iS%, \dary survey and is not intended to be used as one. . W W W W W W W W . W W W W W N• W W W W\ W W W W /W W W W W W W \'X\ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W �' W W 4.'Pn peKy Iinelintormet /or 101 Holmes Road is based on Rele Plaa• "A° +• '/ W \\ W W W W W W y y W W W W W y . 1 W n W W r; .+8ee-6iefeRn!fhn "Al4or further details on boundaries end moriugr t�q/\ '� mcm W W O W ryW _�W Wt I LFiIV LJJ // �•IWc,�y/�R� DSM W W W W W W W W W W W Z -�Y- .+Y �„•�,--W_ W W W W (Shaded) W W �•� ' W✓�W/ )b W APPROVBD WW W•WW W WW \WW `• �•' W W WW W W hW�tO�W WW `• W WW W W W W W W •�l•� W W W \WW ♦W- WW WW �W �W DSM 1WW ` �l•.Y� WW - W WW �W WW �z�ONJoUk 1 WW W� W W W W W W WI/� W W W W W W W W W W W W W W OWNERS: / ` W W DE W W DEFINIKE QF EPGE y E1GE Er1y W W \�•�� ^t. Z'•_, W "N a \W W • W W W \W\W W p\ W W W W W W W\ W W N• . W W W W W fG W W W\ W W W W W W\ W W W W W W W WG W W W W - � ..�� W W .y.. �Tf✓ Y ••-•NC„` ` a„=.I`.V"'y� W .... W W W W W •Y W W W\ W W W W W W W W W W THOMAS R. & W W •`R•\..4•�"^Y ••y`� W -0-4k W W W W W W W W W W W\ W W W W W W W W W W W W W\•Y� // W W \ W W W W W W W W W W KATHLEEN H. j .'. •. •.'.'.'.'.'.'.' _ \ �W �...Y�W - - __ W L�W _ W W W W W W\ -_ W y W y W y W - •�• _.{_� _ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W /* EASTON - � ........•.�.'.` W W W W W W W W W W W W W W fa ��� \ •W yW •\W` �` fir' W •Z•"_••�Ir�_ \ W y W y W� W W W y /W W �Y` / •Y � p y4 - - .. W/y LAKE . . . ---- $,. t�%'.EAS."ON ---- -W '• A -..- _ -_ W W W W -- W W W W `\ _ W W W W / •/ W W PROJECT: ..-ot i CHAMPLAIN i.:. �:o:::: r„az >. »_ W y W W W W W W W W W W W W -- ........... N.... W "C • �° P ..:- :':•:•:':-:-. W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W' W W: W W f..` = �:/• W W W W 7'± 1. .' 4�.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' W W W J y ASH B y A5 ASH ,6" - %y- EASTON PROPERTY APPROXI/ . .'.�.f'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'4 �. . . . . . . . . . . \'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.. \ W W W W W W W W W W W W\ SHORELI �" ---- '-- ...........................',;.'.'.'.'.'.'........ � W W W, ''y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W SITE PLAN 4'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' .................... % W ��'�'�'�'�'�'�-'�'�'.'-'�'�'� W W/ W W W 2,�OL W W W W W •i W W W W W W W W W W W �(.�'•�.•. •.\'. ..'�.........:...:.:.:... 1Q '.'.... •.•\.'.•. ABH' \ y W W W W W W W W W / /.// // �..... ��'�' .. \�'•'•" _ 7O .'.'.'.'.'.^,BI)iC W W W W W WAS W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W / / / / v1• ' tom' * �... . _. /_ . . . . . . . � � �.'.'.'.'.'.'. W \ W W W W •A � W W W W W W W •1 W W W W W W W / _ __ -, I/� m/ / / I // l I // / I / / I // / I%\/ i�-_ -'-- ...v•-(.�7riY .r�•...• j^...d:''�rVi".O"-ff?\`../. ��P\:,� '�:t=.r..��":.r-' ...ri.�..l.'v)..O.:p. 1.7'ou~:>:i` .,;�...:.,....\:.-....i\.._•V-(�\t' .^.�:'Tti,'/�/C/S/,HN/A/NG a.3' \\ W W "W W W )�h 'y VW\ � �W /\WW_ W 4 \ W W W sH styy iWyo�s' WW -dW/ -�Wr�y-WN/ •/ -W- -WW- --WW, /y /W//--/W l-/_i W W W WW 101 HOLMES ROAD1 .. ... sH SOUTH BURLINGTON4--.- H VH 8W VERMONTVMEJ4 UTILITY DOLE EXIST. BUILDING H 8. y ABA ONE .......... THRESHOLD-115109r WO0D F1i n If if'??.'i.x..-'. �- o '---------'- — / WEfSSMAIV :: - _ - - ......... . ' l _AS 10" / �/ P / / I ( WIDE / EA Y ' EA 9 �x15TING FENCE LINE A I I � � 10 / /�Yf �Svr I r �/ 4 BEAM /��/o LEGEND IIIi i i / ' i ,`' /ate ' ' \\ /`jCOTTONW O ' BEAM^ 336 EXISTING CONTOUR �• I I 1 I I I ' \\ / LO ; / {o- / -t2 fER - /' 1 5 —'i Q• LS ox 6' HEM 1 / APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE I ------- ------ I, — — — - — EASEMENT/RIGHT OF WAY LINE - - I I I 1 II I 1 - 10 Moes O SURVEY MARKER FOUND 1 !I I I III \ _ PINE / fry SS --r "�---_-__r--- Route LINE OF y 30" ORI w / � 6�t1 P �—__-'��t__'_" ® SURVEY MARKER PROPOSED II I I I I \ \ -------- 0' - - _-7--_ a---^"--- A�I __ _ _ \\ \ - EXTE •r ES An O \ DATE CB8Cx80 RE'VLSION [] CONC. MARKER PROPOSED / - / 'ion p/• L L.. _ \ i --- -SS— — GRAVITY SEWER LINE / / / ' I I \\- E%. aMH g. PVC �yw— ] /"'-_-�____'-___ — — W — — WATER LINE / RIM-118.72 IN INe110.19 / s j/�-- � \ INV. WT�110.9a \� /. � I ——OE/OT— — OVERHEAD ELECTRIC/TELEPHONE \ \ \ I I / \ GMP 21 \ Tam�ELE SPIKE GMP 21 /tT� \ ELEV.•119.5'-- - —ST— — STORM DRAINAGE LINE �- \ 1 -- ® SEWER MANHOLE I / / / / / /ric -- b 11 / EILV.�t222' HYDRANT ) / \ / / _ I -- - \ \ -_-- / �LflNING DISTRICT: 0 SHUT-OFF II III / // l I 1 v _ 1 -- I - s i` , - nl f / / / I / __-_ � � LAKESHORE NEIGHBORHOOD / `� POWER POLE I I IIl/'j l /I ' I/ I ,/ D.R FARREL. -`rust ZONI ,SETBACK SUMMARY(' EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREES IV I I I l ,'%'nlf 11(y I / / / \ I I / WIDE I' \ / EXISTING WATER EASEMENT LOT SIZE C) 0.28 1.07 CONDITIONS CONIFEROUS TREE I/ IKOUK / FRONTAGE (FT) 176XSTORM DRAIN I I I I II ll ; c RIM=117.88 / I SIDE SETBACK (FT)� \\ 20 O 29 SITE PLAN 0 0 o EXIST. FENCE ( III \ — — — WETLAND DELINEATION j / j j l j Ctj 1 /I \ REAR YARD SETBACK (FT) 30 87 STREAM CENTERLINE // LAKE SETBACK FR M 102 CONTOUR 150 2 �"-- / _- / I / / / / 1� o / \ STREAM SETBACK FT) \ 50 75 - 10 WETLAND SETBA;',IC (FT) O 9 DATe DRA nxc NUMBER 1 BUILDING COVOAGE (FT) 20% 3.0% NOV. 24, 2009 - - II GRAPHk SCALE LOT COVERAGE (FT) 40% 8.6% \ -I -�— f� \ ' BUILDING/HEIGHT (FT) 25\ 22.7 I / I ; , ,v ill - 20' rt C-2 /' / --- ` W W W W (m eeeT) / / \ y y � �\ PnD, ND. ,- : = 20 a // 09222 �' k\ \ ZONING-SEMAtK SUMIAARY— — _ _ _ \ \ SITE ENGINEER: \ --___ LEGEND \ =r' `--_.— __-----__ REQ'D \EXISTING PROPOSED \' ' 336 EXISTING CONTOUR I -� y y' �� \ \ �-.,_- I \ __--i — — — — ----L@�$(ZE (AC.) \\ 0.28 J.07 1.07 - -- 1 \ % — -- FRONTAGE \ ` 176-. — 176 APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE l J W \ \ \ I f - / `---- II fJ J W W J J W J W J ------ --- FRONT Y9RD-SETBACK -(ET� `\ 20 \_ 84 —62 — — — — EASEMENT/RIGHT OF WAY UNE I' J \ _ \\ \ —SIDE' YARD K F `\ �'1Q 29, 1$� / `\\ 1\ D. �!I.�FARRELL-Trast _ gE[�R�fAT�D SSETH CK (ET) `\ 30` _ 87 87 ` _ '� GYII ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC O SURVEY MARKER FOUND \ \ 3' \ J J y J w J J ` — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -LA_K_E SETBACK FROM 10 C`NTOUR� 150 L� \ 3 \ \ fo M4NSReIn vr�wur soun+awwNcror+, yr os+at O SURVEY MARKER PROPOSED W W W W w W W J \ `\ \ \ — _ _ — — — _ _ - _ _ — — — — — —_______—_,STREAM -- -- QS/ I /` 7�—yJ�I{1 JJ JWy yyJWy yy JW JyJW WyJW W JWy W JWyW W WWyJ W WJW W WyW-W WWWJ W \ +WJv W WWW �W WJ W\ \JJW \ W WJ W W W Jy W N%y W WW �W J 'W rJ W WJ 'TW 'T_J �_W •_wJ /_W /—�J_ � W / ---y�\W /` SET/BA K FT) 50 -— — -75� - \\\ \ \7\5 \ J W J W J W y W ---- — — — — — — — —— L N( 50 _99 �//'yy/' �W _ �•G I'WJ ecDCm,NuP%- B.GeNR�T Dmz Rs *z s mO CONC. MARKER PROPOSED J W W J W J W BUILDING COVERAGE (FT) 04.3% —SS—GRAVITY SEWER LINE LOT COVERAGE'(FT) 40% 8,6,% 1ub\ _ _ BbiDING HEIGHT (FT) 3f_ 22.E\ACL WkH CONDITIO�AL USE APPN 35W -—WATER LINE W�W—OE/OT— OVERHEAD ELECTRIC/TELEPHONE y y W W W y y y\aJ W W W W W W W EXISTING ALLOWEb\ PROPOSEDSM J J J yJ W J W J W W yWyyy W WyyJ W J 983.66ST— STORM DRAINAGE LINE BUILDING ROOFFOOTPRINT PPROVED J J J W WW J yyy FOOTPRINT :9092 150% DSMGARAGE ROOF SEWER MANHOLE y y W W y y W W y/. Y y•W y W WJWWWW 1374.58 2061.87 206�y�J /J-J.J FA�><D'eo-zaAe'.'-mw"l "9r.'.rDe.: `»",`.�,.D•.e..«.eDDr OWNERS: HYDRANT / W J `J_' - Y'. _K• FJ 1' - _Y' - y'T J� W S_% 1- F.-�' _ _ - _ - - �,,YI �I..�s_ .�I�- .,- —•—•Y- -Y —•—y- ® SHUT-OFF I .' y y W y W W W W y W y W y W y W y W y W y `1• y W y W y J J W\ •Y •Y y W y J J y J w W / W W W W W W\ W W/ J J W W J J W W J J W W W W W J W W J W W W W J W W W W �.L• �I W '� �,I.IJ`//JW yWWW •JP--WWW YW( •/WW/ -_WW -�)W Y//^•P� \WW W _W __ WW WW y Wy- WyT y y yJ WW yJ wW Jy yW WW WJ WyW WW yW yW JJ-Ww TW• WW�J �WW �WY-WWW` W+Y �A�WWT' ,}W\�WWJ •WW�WWW _WW WWW/�'WW /�WWW NW(_ \J.JV"'•JP WW WW -WW� Wy W I \W\ ` W_ W_\/•L WW W J/ /�� y /y/ y y W W W W WW 'W•Y �W•"'•,W ./ THOMAS R. &`0, POWER POLE WWWJWWWJVWWWWW J J \` J J y /W W W E E J / DECIDUOUS TREES . W W W W W J W J J y J J J y W y y J J J NWn/fy y W W . y/ VVETCAWNDSy /KgTHLEEN H. %4 CONIFEROUS TREE � B41SERT & TU1 WHtLL P►Qe)y /V y yW W W W W it yyyyWyyWW �EASTON .- EXIST. FENCE W W W W W /C W W •.W I W jGW \W W L W) W y/f—..—.. WETLAND DELINEATION y W y W J W W y W y W J y y y y y y W WW W W W W W W 'Y2• PONIOUp W /W ��• ► W W //' Y W W W\ W W y W W/OA W J J J W J J W W I W , �...—...— STREAM CENTERLINE 1 ^y W J 1 I y \ y W W W W W W W W W W W W / y y DE�JNITIgN QF EpGE /y y \JJ y\•\J .t, \Y' \f�...fTWW�-"'•••/Y •-/L-���iy •�• 1.••+`,I{„••TW••'�, W W �L_AKE JW 1J\ J �\•Y W W\\W J W W WW W W W W W W W W W J W W W W/W%/W Wy W Wy W Jy J WW J�•J�••W Wy WW- WJ '•W ,JrYt•WIW •'-W/�WY W ~W / PROJECT `.23A 2�yy yW W W W J W WJ yW WW W W W J y.� W WW W J W yJ W W W y W \y y W W W yrW y : / �� W�•1I rlr `` W'•`J_ W W W r .`• W J\ W V• W W W W . J J J W W W W J W W W %!W W-,_.1-'-•�C W W W /W // // `�• W W W W \ �/ J .y-.._. W W W W >r �R7-L�r a ^V`_ \W W\ W W W W W W W �\ W W W W J W J f% W �i% W W ��y�\ = y_.`>"�O-..Y_:,„—•�.._ J \�V•..,W ••y •_W •• y.••+M•_W..� _ W J •�1\ • A( W W W W W W W �W WN/ W W J J JW�: L' W W W EASTON PROPERTYIN-"T, W JyyyJ W W J J W� / / W W /W \ W W• ��W � .11SDNOy ••rr\ J y W \ J W W W W J W W W W W W W a /� W J J J J J- Alc •/ // // , /'/ / SITE PLAN / �' ��� •• _Ir._, � W W W W N- � W W W W W W W W J W W h /J W W J W W � / / // // J J J W W J b.Y W 4\•• Y•_••••1+._..J�._.. J` Z� - W W �• _ W W J W/' �•'� W\ W W W W W J � W LAKE % T. & K. STON l _ y----_ y y % W J• W w , so w J J••\...�... W\.Y W W W W\ W J WW `WJ •W.\•`W .Y WWW— W—oWr W yW W!WW« �W� yyJY..•W- "yWW W lW•`-`_ Y _-W•/F.\lWiW�+ iWW % W WW WW WJ W /IW ' ,�/N/�// //// / /101 HOLMESROAD SOUTH GTON101 HOLME OAD CHAIPLAIN�WY /� VERMONT !W y W W y y W /zr DR/IR1 S. y ASH 16" / _ �`> // .,� �11/.�Y10Q�' W •W W W W W �1'/ .1' \\�\; S.`•:1 W J W ./ I' / I I / / I A H SADE STEPS\\ S° Iy ya�W WA2•lBOLB"y y y �� y y y y y y y y AS 1\ W W W W y W W •Y J W J J WALL- \J J J J \ W J \ W W W J J J J WW W •Y J W W\ W J J W W W W W /'/�0 I / / I / //! / / 11 // I / \ \�( I \ \_ \�\ ' _' --. RDECI( ^ - / W y:•9y2y -W aW `y W•/ WW �y �y y y WyJ Wy yJW Jy W J WyW J �f.�\W,W J yJ Jy JW Wy JW WW Wy�W Jyjy/J /W/' ��'//' /// ////// / //'// /// ///// /////////////// //�'�,'- / /' // // // / / / / n SW 6RAMW�3, pyE¢- E Jy�Ja Yy }` i' /_/ / / / / / tMor, / / / / / _ - — '\/I 11e•= Fjv -f` __— � J J W �✓� W W.��% /' ----- � / � � '� �// ( // I / �? 72p i/Sn \1iD` — _ �05 — � ,� ���® —9 i 1EN2D_ uAYEr5(MAN--' wNmw,\• / �Ciy' �; „�`c--='\•`\`\\\�\�\ _^- —_--- _ �710 �96o LARNN HEDGEROW (+4.DE As 10.,1 / ■(' — . =� 1lJJplR _ • \ III ! /' / I MSTING FENCE 11NE A' 1VT I e .�• Y I 4 BEAM 0 BEAM/ _��� 117 / ^ / ! DATE CHECKED ON COTTONW D 22" ��-_- I 6HEM1&3 - �- - I/ - `-- ----- // I / 1V�/\ A\ I II IIII I 'v;I I I v;v/ /v I vvv \\ _ - \\\ _ - /�/ ISy•—• _ _1fTA,�--''\ \ B" \HEM \\ / vv --------"'--- I` -uw/--------- -_�.- ES POADE - - EX. SMH PV0 _qw �-------- --/---- PROPOSE RIM-71&72 --- - IN-10 IN10.18 21GMP-- - - GRADING I I ` I — 711 YARD DRAIN n PLAN I , II l l l //' %%H -- --_"3Y TOM W FB EH 161 / \/ GRAPHIC SCALE /--- ------ - ELEV-122.2 n/f / A v / 1. j Nn F RRE t / / / / ✓, / N - RAINNG NUMBER D.U. rus - - - \ / OAxR O —_\—// i•/ �/ �� L�L \\ (\ �w EE:E:r) FEB , 2010 / j \ 1 h 20 It. — � if ' 9GALE UK , / \ 1 I I I / (' I X. STORM DRAIN / \ ' / 1 — 20 Cj_3 I II \ RIM=117.88 \\ \ PRO NO ( \v 09222 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 JUNE 2010 PAGE 3 5. Site Plan Application #SP-10-41 of City of South Burlington for a 2.15 acre municipal dog park to include a gravel parking lot, 265, 285, 287 Kirby Road: Mr. Nedde showed an ortho photo plan from from 2004. He indicated the houses which no longer exist. He also noted that all the homes on Picard Circle are vacant. There is a ravine to the back (south) of the property and tree lines forming other borders. The Airport has given permission to remove some brush. Mr. Nedde then indicated where there will be graveled parking spaces (a total of 22) and room for snow storage and a graveled walkway. There will also be a "yard hydrant" for water for the dogs. The dog park will consist of an area for large dogs (1.9 acres) and one for smaller dogs (4200 sq. ft.) The entrance area will be an isolated 10'x10' pad, so the dogs can't get out on their own. There will be no lighting in the park, but there are some picnic tables proposed. All fencing will be vinyl coated (probably green) with galvanized posts. Fencing will be 5 feet tall. Mr. Stuono asked if the park will be open to non -South Burlington residents. Mr. Hubbard said it will. No other issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-10-41 of City of South Burlington subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Conditional Use Application #CU-10-07 of Kathleen & Thomas Easton to: 1) reconstruct a single family dwelling and increase its footprint by 50%, and 2) allow the height of the reconstructed structure to exceed the 25-foot height limit by 9.4 feet for a total height of 34.4 feet, 101 Holmes Road: Mr. Marshall located the property off the private part of Holmes Road. He indicated the existing house. He noted that the property fronts on the Lake, and there are some Class 3 wetlands on the property. Some site improvements are proposed. Landscaping has been created to take advantage of the new potential for sunlight. There will also be an improved wildlife habitat potential. Mr. Marshall gave members photos of buildings in the vicinity and a rendering of the proposed building. He also provided a "shadow study" which he said shows no impact on nearby homes. A portion of this property is in the 100-year flood plain. FEMA maps show it out of the flood plain, but city maps do not. There is a pending "Letter of Map Amendment" (LOMA), and the Board cannot make a decision until that is received. Mr. Marshall indicated the current line and } DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 JUNE 2010 PAGE 4 where the line will be shown when the LOMA is received. Mr. Dinklage said the Board can proceed as if they were going to make a decision. Mr. Dinklage stressed that any removal of trees which are shown on the plan would have to come back to the DRB. Ms. LaRose noted that the property is not in an area where storm water review is required. She has not been able to speak with the Stormwater Superintendent. Mr. Rabinowitz said he talked with him, and there were no issues. Ms. LaRose said she will get a letter to that effect. Mr. Knudsen asked if there is any blocking of views to the Lake. Mr. Marshall said existing trees screen the house and are higher than the house will be. There are also existing Lake access paths which will not be compromised. Mr. Rabinowitz said the total square footage will be approximately 2500 sq. ft. plus a possible attic and/or basement, for a 3300 sq. ft. potential. Mr. Lipson, who lives at the south end of the road, said the plans are consistent with the neighborhood, and they strongly support the project. He added that what is proposed is better than what is there now. Mr. Twitchell, an adjoining neighbor, said they are "tickled pink" that this is being done. Members of the Board indicated they favored approval when the federal issue is resolved. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Conditional Use Application #CU-10-07 of Kathleen & Thomas Easton until 15 June 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Preliminary Plat Application #SD-10-16 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna to subdivide a 39,450 sq. ft. parcel into three lots of approximately equal size, Highland Terrace: Mr. Knudsen stepped down during this application due to a conflict of interest. Mr. McCain showed the proposed layout with proposed house footprints. There would be similar houses on all 3 lots. One of the houses would be occupied by the Shalna's daughter and her husband. Mr. Dinklage noted that this review does not include approval for the houses. Mr. McCain said water would be on -site because it is cost prohibitive to bring in city water because of the elevation. The proposed hydrant has been okayed by the Fire Chief. Ms. LaRose said the Water Department is OK with this. Mr. McCain added there will also be "rain gardens." The applicant is requesting that TDR's not be required to be purchased before the filing of the al' i - Interested Persons Record and Service List southlburli toll Ek 6A OWT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V,S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of.notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: t! �'i N "A I ®� o PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME Men IKir- Ammmr-re, — -- -��� V F"JOct� I Ur IN I tKtb I SVaz Elz-v WX LA-A's"7 I Z �.��SrcX Jam'., / Z �'-j U" y7- ' 1� _ (nAI �j 5 lot 1�0( VIIm L9 jo s C��,/ S �i C` •ass a Interested Persons Record and Service List NF. AM 0 NT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V S A R AAPI fk% The "S -_- - J %u,. I I �DRB � � gust keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five) working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING AnnRFSS PPP) IP!'T /lC 1A1TE:Mr7c-r _Rck -7 60 « -- CO �c' 114 � f I LL' tom( O'n) G 1W MAW � vJ ` 0 574 If ( PA /oo Avg bUo P,OI wcll -TZ,49- , IN 0(,,A 3 s -- PON 40M Southdrait V E R M o4T Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achidve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: ( , -2-0 I ) PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAII 1m , AnnRr'¢c oon 1cnr r,r- mvvr- -7vZ AI J yJ ' i S n VT OSgq.�- �. ��t i I' Ins VT 6S43y a� c � ' %-1i.�2��-F-� L rL � O M s�-n�5•�czr� �.lfCv�9 1.,�•� .. . P U V c_4 ►SCITW'31 -4-7 �� ,,- �aa rr?� 4` /o �- �� Vv i�kl�'. �5146_-OtA- No Text PROJECT DESCRIPTION Kathleen & Thomas Easton, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking conditional use approval to: 1) reconstruct a single family dwelling and increase its footprint by 50%, and 2) allow the height of the reconstructed structure to exceed the 25 foot height limit by 9.4ft for a total height of 34.4 ft, 101 Holmes Road. COMMENTS Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on May 10, 2010 and have the following comments. Table 1. Dimensional Requirements LN Zonin District ' Require Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 1.07 acres Max. Building Coverage 20% 4.5% Max. Overall Coverage 40% 13.6% Min. Front Setback 20 ft. >20 ft Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. Maximum Height 25 ft. >30 ft. 4 zoning compliance The maximum height for all structures shall be no more than twenty-five feet above the average pre -construction grade adjoining such structure. The elevations show that the home is proposed to be 34'4" from the average pre - construction grade to the mid -point of the tallest portion and the eaves. Section 4.08 (referred to from Section 4.07(E) states that the maximum height of a structure in the district may be increased to thirty-five feet if approved by the Development Review Board subject to the provisions of Article 14, Conditional Use Review. In addition, the Development Review Board shall determine hat the proposed increase in height will not affect aversely: a) views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; b) access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; and c) adequate on -site parking Staff has thoroughly reviewed the application for compliance with these criteria, has visited the site, and has spoken with the applicant. The subject property is an unusually large lot in the district, measuring over 1 acre in size. If any property were to be adversely affected with respect to access to sunlight, it would be those to the north and east. The home to the east is approximately 300 feet away, and there are no homes to the north closer than 200 feet. Shadows from this size home will not extend close enough to block access to sunlight of these properties. The applicant will be prepared to talk more about this at the hearing. With respect to views, the Maher property to the east appears to be the only one to be potentially impacted by the taller building. It appears based on the site plan that the optimal view remains slightly to the north of the newly proposed home, and not through the thickest portion of trees and growth which lie between their home and the newly proposed one. K Although their home is more than 300 feet to the east, the Board should carefully consider any testimony and evidence they may have with respect to this criterion. The Board should discuss the applicant's request for a height waiver. 1. The Board should discuss the applicant's request for a height waiver of 94'; for a building height of 344". Parking on site is more than adequate. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 12.01(D) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations the Proposed structure shall be reviewed as a conditional use and shall meet the following standards: The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Staff feels that the proposed project is consistent with the planned character of the area, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan. According to Section 4.08(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Lakeshore Neighborhood Zoning District is formed in order to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the Lakeshore neighborhoods located in the vicinity of Bartlett Bay Road and Holmes Road. It is designed to promote the area's historic development pattern of smaller lots and reduced setbacks. This district also encourages the conversion of seasonal homes to year round residences. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is consistent with the stated purpose of the Lakeshore Neighborhood District, which is "to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the lake shore neighborhoods located in the vicinity of Bartlett Bay Road and Homes Road. " The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities The proposed project will not adversely affect municipal services. This new home will have no impact on educational facilities. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. The proposed project will not have an adverse affect on the character of the neighborhood or zoning district that this property falls within. 3 (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. It is extremely unlikely that this proposed addition will generate any additional traffic. Any traffic that is generated by the newer home will be negligible in its effect on the neighborhood. (d) Bylaws in effect. The proposed addition meets all of the dimensional standards of the zoning district, with the exception of height as noted above. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposed project will not likely affect renewable energy resources. (0 General public health and welfare. The proposed project will not likely have an adverse affect on general public welfare. Pre -Existing Structures along Lake Champlain and within Queen City Park This proposed expansion shall be reviewed under Section 12.01(D) of the SBLDR which includes all lands within one hundred fifty feet horizontal distance of the high water elevation of Lake Champlain. The expansion and reconstruction of pre-existing structures on these lands may be approved by the DRB as a conditional use provided the requirements of the underlying zoning district and the following standards are met: a) The structure to be expanded or reconstructed was originally constructed on or before April 24, 2000. The existing structure meets this criterion. The applicant states that the primary structure was constructed in 1950. b) The expanded or reconstructed structure does not extend any closer, measured in terms of horizontal distance, to the applicable high water elevation or stream centerline than the closest point of the existing structure. The proposed expansion is no closer to the lake than the existing structure. c) The total building footprint area of the expanded or reconstructed structure shall not be more than fifty percent larger than the footprint of the structure lawfully existing on April 24, 2000. The home was 1375 square feet prior to April 24, 2000. The proposed new construction is 2062 SF in footprint and therefore meets this criterion (maximum of 2062.5 allowed): the total of the expansion is approximately 50% larger than the footprint of the existing structure. C! d) An erosion control plan for construction is submitted by a licensed engineer detailing controls that will be put in place during construction or expansion to protect the associated surface water. The applicant has submitted a sufficient and well -planned erosion control plan. e) A landscaping plan showing plans to preserve, maintain and supplement existing trees and ground cover vegetation is submitted and the DRB finds that the overall plan will provide a visual and vegetative buffer for the lake and/or stream. The plan indicates existing landscaping on the property which primarily consists of a monoculture of trees and shrubby undergrowth. The applicant has submitted a detailed Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan which outlines the goals for landscaping and seeding on the property. 12.01 General Stream and Surface Water Protection Standards A. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Section to provide for the protection and improvement of the surface waters and streams within the City of South Burlington, Lake Champlain and Shelburne Bay, and the watersheds contained wholly or partially within the City. These regulations and standards are intended to lead to the establishment and protection of natural areas along the City's surface waters to provide improved protection for water quality and the provision of open space areas and wildlife habitat. Section 12.01(C)(1)(e) applies: C. Surface Water Buffer Standards ("Stream Buffers") (e) All land within one hundred fifty (150) feet horizontal distance of the high water elevation of Lake Champlain, which for purposes of these regulations shall be one hundred two (102) feet above mean sea level datum. (2) General standards. It is the objective of these standards to promote the establishment of heavily vegetated areas of native vegetation and trees in order to reduce the impact of stormwater runoff, reduce sedimentation, and increase infiltration and base flows in the City's streams and Lake Champlain. Therefore, except as specifically permitted by the DRB pursuant to the standards in Section 12.01(C)(3), (C)(4), (D) and/or (E) below, all lands within a required stream buffer defined above shall be left in an undisturbed, naturally vegetated condition. Supplemental planting and landscaping with appropriate species of vegetation to achieve these objectives shall be permitted. The specific standards for the vegetation and maintenance of stream buffers are as follows: (a) The clearing of trees that are not dead, heavily damaged by ice storms or other natural events, or diseased, and the clearing of any other vegetation other than invasive species, is permitted only in conjunction with DRB approval pursuant to (3) or (4) below. (b) Any areas within a required stream buffer that are not vegetated or that are disturbed during construction shall be seeded with a naturalized mix of grasses rather than standard lawn grass, and shall not be mowed more than one (1) time per calendar year after establishment. (c) The creation of new lawn areas within stream buffers is not permitted after the effective date of these regulations. There shall be no clearing of trees on the site with the exception of those which meet the standards outlined above. 2. There shall be no clearing of trees on the site with the exception of that which meets the standards outlined in Section 12.01 C(2) of the SBLDR. (3) Expansion of pre-existing structures within stream buffers. The expansion of pre-existing structures within stream buffers, except as provided in Section D below, shall be permitted only in accordance with the standards for non -complying structures in Article 3, Section 3.11 of these Regulations. D. Pre -Existing Structures along Lake Champlain and within Queen City Park (1) Applicability. The provisions of this section shall apply to preexisting structures within the areas defined as follows: (a) All lands within one hundred fifty (150) feet horizontal distance of the high water elevation of Lake Champlain, which for purposes of these regulations shall be one hundred two (102) feet above mean sea level datum; (b) All lands within the Queen City Park zoning district located within one hundred (100) feet horizontal distance of the centerline of Potash Brook. (2) Expansion and construction of pre-existing structures. Within the areas defined in Section (D)(1) above, the expansion and reconstruction of pre-existing structures may be approved by the DRB as a conditional use provided the requirements of the underlying zoning district and the following standards are met: (a) The structure to be expanded or reconstructed was originally constructed on or before April 24, 2000. For purposes of these Regulations, expansion may include the construction of detached accessory structures including garages and utility sheds. (b) The expanded or reconstructed structure does not extend any closer, measured in terms of horizontal distance, to the applicable high water elevation or stream centerline than the closest point of the existing structure. (c) The total building footprint area of the expanded or reconstructed structure shall not be more than fifty percent (50%) larger than the footprint of the structure lawfully existing on April 24, 2000. For purposes of these regulations, reconstruction may include razing the existing structure and/or foundation and constructing a new structure in accordance with the provisions of the underlying zoning district regulations and this section. (d) An erosion control plan for construction is submitted by a licensed engineer detailing controls that will be put in place during construction or expansion to protect the associated surface water. (e) A landscaping plan showing plans to preserve, maintain and supplement existing trees and ground cover vegetation is submitted and the DRB finds that the overall plan will provide a visual and vegetative buffer for the lake and/or stream. (3) Erosion control measures and water -oriented development along Lake Champlain. Within the area along Lake Champlain defined in Section (D)(1)(a) above, the installation of erosion control measures and water -oriented development may be approved by the DRB as a conditional use provided the following standards are met: (a) The improvement involves, to the greatest extent possible, the use of natural materials such as wood and stone. (b) The improvement will not increase the potential for erosion. [1 (c) The improvement will not have an undue adverse impact on the aesthetic integrity of the Lakeshore. In making a determination pursuant to this criterion, the DRB may request renderings or other additional information relevant and necessary to evaluating the visual impact of the proposed improvement. (d) A landscaping plan showing plans to preserve, maintain and supplement existing trees and ground cover vegetation is submitted and the DRB finds that the overall plan will provide a visual and vegetative buffer for the lake and/or stream. Staff has already discussed these issues above in this report. The applicant has also submitted a stormwater management and erosion control plan as well as a riparian corridor restoration plan (attached). The applicant has also addressed the Class III wetlands on the site, along with their functions and values in a report from a wetland, professional. Staff has reviewed all of the aforementioned documents and has no concerns with the proposal with respect to the above criteria relating to construction along the Lakeshore. FLOOD PLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT The subject property lies within the Floodplain Overlay District. The existing home and proposed home are at least partially within the overlay. The South Burlington Land Development Regulations are very specific about what may and may not be built in this overlay district, and single family homes are not permitted unless in conjunction with agriculture, park, or recreation facilities. The Floodplain Overlay District map is out of date and in some places inaccurate. FEMA has been working on redrawing the maps using proper ground delineations and a map of the new boundaries is available in draft form. However, it is only a draft and has not yet been adopted. The proposed home would be OUTSIDE of the new boundary. However, again, this is only a draft and is not official until adopted. Staff has been working with the applicant and the FEMA program towards a letter of map amendment which would ensure that the subject structure is outside of the flood plain overlay. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board continue Conditional Use Application #CU-10-07, subject to a change in the flood plain map which demonstrates that the proposed structure is outside of the flood plain, and the applicant addressing the numbered conditional items in the comments section of this report. Respectfully submitted, aathya�n aRose, AICP, Associate Planner Copy to: Kathleen and Thomas Easton, Property Owners Dave Marshall, Civil Engineering Associates, Contact for Applicant 7 Permit #-- n APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation (X) Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY): 4.07 (E) Height of Structure which refers to Section 4.08(F) Building height greater than 25 feet but less than 35 feet and Section 12.01(D)(2) "reconstruction of pre-existing structures" WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ? NA 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #): Kathleen & Thomas Easton, 135 Covington Lane, Shelburne, VT 05482 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) Vol 799 Pg 213 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone, fax # and email address) Kathleen & Thomas Easton, 135 Covington Lane, Shelburne, VT 05482 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax # if different from above): David S. Marshall, P.E., Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., 10 Mansfield View Lane, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 101 Holmes Road 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 0870-00101 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Residential Building and detached garage with a total square footage of 1,375 square feet. B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Residential building reconstructed in accordance with provisions set forth in section 12.01(D)(2)(c) with an attached garage. C. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): 1,375 SF existing, 2,060 SF proposed. D. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): Computed existing Grade = 110.8; First Floor Elevation 120.5; Height of Roof (per above first floor to Mid point of eaves/roof line per "Height' definition) 24.7% Total height of building (120.51-110.8'+24.71) = 34.4' E. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): 1 F. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): NA G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): In addition to the Conditional Use criterion (please see attached) for which this application is to be reviewed, Section 4.08(F)(2) requires that the Development Review Board shall also determine that the proposed increase in height will not affect adversely: (a) Views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; (b) Access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; and (c) Adequate on -site parking. Please see attached Conditional Use narrative. 8) LOT COVERAGE A. Total parcel size: 1.07 Aces or 46,609 Sq. Ft. B. Buildings: Existing 3.0% /1,375 Sq. Ft Proposed 4.5% / 2,062 Sq. Ft. C. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 8.6% / 4,008 Sq. Ft. Proposed 13.6% / 6,339 Sq. Ft. D. Total area to be disturbed during construction: 31,000 Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. Acknowledged. 9) COST ESTIMATES A. Building (including interior renovations): $ Not applicable for residential use B. Landscaping $ Not applicable for residential use C. Other site improvements (please list with cost): Not applicable for residential use 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 10 VTE B. A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 1 VTE C. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 1 VTE 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8 AM to 9 PM 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION : 7 days a week. 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June, 2011 14) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (list names and address of all abutting property owners, including those across any street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet of paper if necessary): Shawn Maher, 99 Holmes Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 Michael Weissman, 115 Holmes Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 David M. Farrell Trust, 25 Bartlett Bay Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE,'OF APPLICANT &2d� 'e 4,xm S,,(- SIGNATUREE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: 13 Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this application and find it to be: INCOMPLETE ❑ Incomplete rIVI ���I�ll Is�;tll I� r���OClr�r��o ll IC� 10 Mansfield View Lane Phone: 802-864-2323 South Burlington, VT 05403 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com May 10, 2010 Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 550 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Easton Residence - 101 Homes Road Applicant/Owner: Kathleen & Thomas Easton Site Plan and Conditional Use Application Dear Mr. Belair: After the many coordination efforts with the Planning & Zoning Office, Kathleen and Thomas Easton are submitting this Conditional Use application in support of the redevelopment of the existing single family home located at 101 Holmes Road. Existing Conditions - The project is located on a 1.07 acre parcel. The topography provides a transition from an upper plateau, where the neighboring single family homes are located, to the Lake to the west and an unnamed stream to the north. The existing conditions at the site generally includes a lack of subcanopy vegetation due to the lack of light reaching the ground. Mature hemlocks located along the south slope cut off light all year round. The presence of these trees have also suppressed any significant vegetative cover on the ground along the top portions and slopes of the embankment area. Stormwater from Holmes Road and the residential use flows northwesterly to the top and down the embankment slopes down to the wetland below. Even though the existing structure is located 160 feet from the north -south shoreline of Lake Champlain, the existing structure is deemed non -complying with regard to the setback from Lake Champlain as the 102 foot contour which defines the high-water mark of Lake Champlain extends well into the property. Proposed Conditions - The project seeks to remove the existing structure and detached garage in favor of a new single family residence with an attached garage. Article 12 (D) "Pre-existing structures along Lake Champlain and within Mr. Ray Belair Page 2 of 4 May 10, 2010 Queen City Park" lays out specific requirements to be met in order to allow for the redevelopment of areas located within 150 feet of Lake Champlain. We have highlighted the requirements of this Section and the proposed means of compliance. (2) Expansion and construction of pre-existing structures Within the areas defined in Section (D)(1) , the expansion and reconstruction of pre-existing structures may be approved by the DRIB as a conditional use provided the requirements of the underlying zoning district and the following standards are met: (a) The structure to be expanded or reconstructed was originally constructed on or before April 24, 2000. For purposes of these Regulations, expansion may include the construction of detached accessory structures including garages and utility sheds. The primary structure was constructed in 1950. (b) The expanded or reconstructed structure does not extend any closer, measured in terms of horizontal distance, to the applicable high water elevation or stream centerline than the closest point of the existing structure. The zoning setback summary of sheet C-3 identifies the existing and proposed setbacks. In all instances the existing setbacks are retained or expanded upon with this application. (c) The total building footprint area of the expanded or reconstructed structure shall not be more than fifty percent (50%) larger than the footprint of the structure lawfully existing on April 24, 2000. For purposes of these regulations, reconstruction may include razing the existing structure and/or foundation and constructing a new structure in accordance with the provisions of the underlying zoning district regulations and this section. The existing structures have a total footprint of 1,375 square feet. A 50% increase in this value allows a footprint area of up to 2,062.5 square feet. (d) An erosion control plan for construction is submitted by a licensed engineer detailing controls that will be put in place during construction or expansion to protect the associated surface water. Sheets C6.0 and C6.1 provide an erosion prevention and sediment control plan along with the supporting narrative and details. Mr. Ray Belair Page 3 of 4 May 10, 2010 (e) A landscaping plan showing plans to preserve, maintain and supplement existing trees and ground cover vegetation is submitted and the DRB finds that the overall plan will provide a visual and vegetative buffer for the lake and/or stream. The proposed project seeks to convert a monoculture of trees and lack of understory growth into a vibrant wildlife and stream corridor area. The attached Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan outlines the proposed goals of the landscaping plan for the project. (3) Erosion control measures and water -oriented development along Lake Champlain. Within the area along Lake Champlain defined in Section (13)(1)(a), the installation of erosion control measures and water oriented development may be approved by the DRB as a conditional use provided the following standards are met: (a) The improvement involves, to the greatest extent possible, the use of natural materials such as wood and stone. The proposed work within the Lake Champlain setback primarily utilizes stabilized slopes and new plantings to transition from the upper plateau down to the lake level. The few walls that are proposed near the house within the setback limits are proposed to be constructed with stone. (b) The improvement will not increase the potential for erosion. The design has implemented a stormwater management plan that eliminates the steep overbank flows in favor of a stabilized conveyance. The landscaping plan utilizes a mixture of plantings in both height and type to provide a better stabilized understory. (c) The improvement will not have an undue adverse impact on the aesthetic integrity of the lakeshore. In making a determination pursuant to this criterion, the DRB may request renderings or other additional information relevant and necessary to evaluating the visual impact of the proposed improvement. The proposed project will not change the character of the traditional north -south shoreline. It will make significant improvements in the character of the riparian corridor through the elimination of the tree monoculture in favor of a diversity in plant material types designed to augment wildlife habitat in the area. Mr. Ray Belair Page 4 of 4 May 10, 2010 (d) A landscaping plan showing plans to preserve, maintain and supplement existing trees and ground cover vegetation is submitted and the DRB finds that the overall plan will provide a visual and vegetative buffer for the lake and/or stream. The proposed project seeks to convert a monoculture of trees and lack of understory growth into a vibrant wildlife and stream corridor area. The attached Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan outlines the proposed goals of the landscaping plan for the project. In support of the development of the site in a manner that will provide an improved transition and riparian corridor from the upper plateau down to the stream area, some wetland impact is proposed. The amount of impact has been minimized by utilizing a slope of 2:1 from the upper plateau down to the stream. The design for the project was shaped around the expectations outlined in Article 12 Section 12.02 (E) "Standards for Wetland Protection". We have attached a narrative that addresses the standards of Article 12(E)(3) associated with proposed impact of 2711 square feet of Class III wetland. Please find attached a completed applications, attachments and supporting plans for this project. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 864-2323 x310. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer \dsm Enclosures: Conditional Use Application and $188 Application Fee Conditional Use Narrative Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan Narrative Stormwater Management Plan Narrative Wetlands Investigation Report (Oakledge Environmental) Wetlands Protection Narrative 8 Full Size Plans and One 11" x 17" reduced Size Plan set cc: K. Easton (w/ enclosures), B. Rabinowitz (w/ enclosures); CEA File 09222 (w/ enclosures) P:\AutoCADD Projects\2009\09222\Permitting\City\Belair Cover.wpd rl 80Uf11 ELEVATION EASTE AT= U 9nT=1'O ri@=PO - -- BRAD RA NOWT M ARCHITECT DESIGN STUDIES: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS � ■ ° e"..,�" mF EASTON RESIDENCE PERMIT REVIEW: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION! 2.' SOUTH BURLINGTON,VERMONT OIHIIIA No Text SITE ENGINEER W W W /W W W W W W W\ 1 I W W Fr `W A' � W W W W W W W W W W W W W W I W W W W rY' �Y\ W EiAi/"�W W W •O""�-w •y -al. �. \- W W W- W W W W W W W W / W I / VNETLW)S W W W W W W W W W Z 'gym- -W- W W W W W W W W 1 J S h a d ed) CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC W W W \ W 1v W Iµ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W \\ W W W W W "-\S'�'-� - rY- "• - W W W\ ` W t�� Sa�� K \ 1 ` ` 1 904dM-2ffi.9 FVl' 80246 1 n haD: xxw.EM�tCam W\ W/ W W W W W W W W W W / k- IO.W W W W W W W W \ W W W W W \ W W W W W W W +V `•'�•I<• \1 W W W\ / W W / W W W W W W W W •G W W\ W /r/ W W W W W\\ W W W W W \ \W W W W W W / •�••,_�„� \ W W W W xY 1 W W W ItY Z' �iON T,OU �• W I W W , W y/L .Y W W W W \\ W W W W W W /OR W QP P �W_W W _ W W +DE QL IKON QF F�GE� y MAHERW W W W\\ W W W W W -41 W W W W W W ACL `•I _ ,JY'� 1� W`� W Q/ "W W W W \\W W i W W W W W \ �C® J I•/ 3 -_ \ W W W W W W \ W W W W W W W DSM "w,� 70 W �Y •�••W(` '�•?� •T',,,� 'aY W W W W W •Y W W W W W W W\ W W W W W W _ W Y) W W WY'•.�...�- '.\ \� V�, 1/ / /........... .... ................... .. ... ............. \ \J( W W W W W DSM .. OWNERS :E ...................... .. ......... .y\ .y j^•aw.._.._W _= -V\ ...IN + .._y _....h_. W W W •l>` y W W W W •Y W W W W W W lW Ezs'nNc" \ THOMAS R. :;..':':'::.:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::::::::::::::•. W W W W_ J% W •�k W W W W �\ W W W W W W W W W . ` �... _.._ �.. .:.:.. .... .. .... .. ......... \ _ _�`-RF W W W W W--w W W W W W W W W KATHLEEN H. C .� ... .;:. _ _ ................ •Y W w T� �J p .._ _.._.. .._ •- - _ - - _. .. .. .. ..... w. W W pW �:h. his. '•�Y- •• W W W W W W EASTON �' W W W W W W W /� � ` ...".... NATURAL � u�o W '.. W._.._ w--�Jr--a� •......w W W W W �;}'_._, W ; W W /�'y, g j//�I,A]� /�/////P T� T/��///T �/i _ . GENERATION - W W W W W W W W W W W` W W "Z� W� W `�.`W W _W •�.•�•'W W �• W 1 Jll.aX 1. V .. W W W W W W W W .. ...... .. ..... ................ J ..�.. \ / .. - A A A XISTINC W W W IV L.�• tl�.. "r`••�•• •• W �.+6�` H%4 \ W W /-':':�:-:'.�.•.-.�.�:�:�:-:':':':' .':�.���.�.�:�.�.�.�:�.�:�:�:�:�:':'.':�.�:�.�:�:-.�:�:�:�.':':'.'.'.'.'.....�.�........ � W W W W DRAINAGE W W W W W r W W Z._ W . ...... ..: ?>:' 7:::C : � '- - ` LUNGE P00 E V V A G I .. PfiQf?OSE�::LAtiJ N: W W W W W W W W W W ` W W W W W' W W PROJECT: - •\ •• AT $70RMVYATER I I 7 F N A - D D N W W W DR Di% nP W W W W W O A�. �. `� � AS 8DRAIN OU :�\ .:.:!.}iiii?ii?" �:�:�" :�:�.�.' >• TF$LL 8" eY :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::.:.:�4, TY W W W W W W W W W -. �... ;.\ W 2 ^°` W Y+ y\ W E TON PROPER SITE PLAN I /'% / / / / \ �'� ..... ... \ • }72 -6 W \ WASH ,9" W W W W W W\ W W W C 6' U ..... .. .... .... t I \ \.. \.. n//f,y I�T{ 101 HOLMES ROAD wSH SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT .. w . ;. w.; r W; r:.w W W W W W�I + + + ter+ ' '_ 11 / I I I I I +++A61-k �''_`++ .fIISER .. � *{I{.+,' +'f� .... IM":. . ..... ......... /; / , / , , ::.»� ;I •+ - l \ I( ' I /1 // / // / / /,-_-//� •�3. c r'`R +}plg \`• \ �F�j2 lOJF- `71°'`� a- ,z -_ *. - -.<. _`-.T I'_.Jri�S jM a / 105_/,�---- ---- -- --- — A ^tiOo QS --- _ ----n/f ++++ .. ENT. 120'-6• WEISSMAN - LS LEGFND // GeROW �14i / LAS 10„I/� °s 83' 12_HDPE �� 336— AXIS N �CIGTOUR/ / I // \\ - / ) J1 (` LANbI• w .:.'I '.. .:E--- . �i'. / / 7 \l-_ \ I ;q 0" -. - : t•. '� FRB JJ o AR D 0 BEAM// / !'r�.// APPt�b MAT tjRQPE �JNE / ,'.., is.', ZONE 1-WETLAN6/UP I I EXISTING FENCE LINE ^ _ BEAM _L ANK STABILITY, DE ' ' - _ h IEA� NI7 IG�TIOFIf A� UNE/ .. T / ....1�/ \\ GRA EVE /^ COTTO, D,',', / ��.�;. o•/ O ISU YI MARlkEf FbUl4D / ' 1.... U SLOPE PLANTING2T• • " ' " " / / I -1 II I I .... .. .. I RUNOFF. SOFT -TRANS4T7\ON / ::. :!, / _ /7 ARD DRA1N ® ISU lI MARKEk 40PO$ED t190.. ' . 7 1 ... - .. I I � I 1 I f I I / S FILTER STRIP. v / �y 11a3��' . . I CQ, C. MARK R 0,R0POS�D w7's c�c�B Rens�oN /�-- I I I AREA $S— — VIIfY EWER �U E I / '•'.'• .- .'.-� � 4 � � -- � .\......'. .. .'...... � .... // �=� __� LL Q —OE/OT-t' RI EA ELEQ C/It HONE BIB // o ;...y....-:' kAWN / j ......._./i":`.>'.�- - �__\ / -- -- II ..F.'�. ..P - LINE -, E — ® / ORM D�tAJA(oE ILl1�E NS l - - - \ ST L W�R LIAI1H10IE \ \\ \ - -- :1 \ qo - - _ II .� II H�DRANIR I \\ \ y - O --- — ---- MES I \ _��— } - ®j I / UT-QFFI I I j / \\ '-------, / �/ � _ �07- -' f" ,'--------- �� \\ -- - - B S �- 1 IPOWERI POLE I , / �- > ,� TORMWATER \\ I f -- _ MANAGEMENT - �/ ��I \dECIDUpl1Sl TREES \1\ CO�IFEIOUS "EEI I/ 11 -_1L- PLAN — D DELANA710N YARD DRAIN 1 4 I qN // // - I �{ RIM-116.9 I l / / / // _ _----F-_..�� H INV.-113.9 T �...—..� I EA,M CEN LINE / 1\ / / / _ --- II Il \ \ \ / / / / _-- t / f \ \ DATE DRADING NUMBER � GRAPHIC SCALE t %--- ---- M/ F /f - n IN FEET � \ \ PROJ. NO 1 inch = 15 It 09222 T. & K. STON ' _ .. � w w w w w y w w Flo w w w w w -- I,V_... -.. -IV ` w w 101 HOL ME OAD 41 14,1 11 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. CD �j 10 MMISFIEfD WEW[ANE, SOUTH BURIINGTON, VT 05/03 uo y w w �L w w w LPL w �L ` .. ��L �Y-..�Y-.. W�x rue so vll , : _<w._ w Dm©- DnerN -'---` ' w ,0% w w w w w w w w w w w w w wI w w w w •� ACL 10 ASH 8' ASH 8" ASH 16" /�� w w w w w w w w w ' w w L w cesc�n \\ U RQS ASH 8" 1 i DSM \� \ S w� , w,\ w w 1 eeexoven RAD7� ` \ ` w w 24BOL w v w \ DSM STEPS TE \` ST MAPLE 8" w OWNERS: WA L T \ 112-6 ` 0 0 I u>ASH LAWN ll \\\ ELI THOMAS R. & _ - _ `--' - KATHLEEN H. --BEDt 6w w S. EASTON _ RAMP: 1�2 _I ETit8:5 - .t \`� .I. w w D , .v W wI .l� w W R DECK— - _ .� w�' •v .t .I. .� w y w w t 1 / 0 E \RISE_R\ j/ w w �\ (/ j W �Y W L Y �Y w Y Y PROJECT: _-A-S-H-I` 'W 'LA �-'I-8'-6 - 'v 'ENI. a :n'• _ � �_ � / � � F - EASTON PROPERTY A-F HO \'`;1_ /%/,�� ---- SITE PLAN $ — r WETLANa — - n/ f ,1 /BED ^� _ 101 HOLMES ROAD -- S 120'-6"'\•21 � L1 — \���� -_ !-- �11� - - - - _ SOUTHBURLINGTON VEISSMAN /// STONE VERMONT RETAINING WALL -TOW -o-115— FOgR LAWN NepCFRow LLS I IIIED REN"C-f TJNG ASH 10"I LA —_ —_ . _ . _ . _ _ - WA IQS RVICE -, I LAWN-'r \ '� /� X OR NEW ILfNE IF REQUIRED \ �' 'c \ B1J 3/4?TYPE "K"COPPER ,' \� VRB 71� k\\\ , 0 BEAM i// - ! / \ 4 0 HO BEAM � •' ONO � / � �. 1 � - " � '' INSTALL A CLEANOUT \ \\\/COTTONW D / 4W y AT BEND �1 GRAB \ ,� // S n 33•= DasT \ INV.=113.75 ,, / 22" / j�_ f,+ 9n APPRO7•AATE PROPERTY RE`� / 1 / — - — EASEMENTMGHT OF WAY UNE SURVEY MARKER FOUND I�\\ '6GIHEMLOCK • SURVEY MARKER PROPOSED�� / `\O ,' •,� \ `',�6� \ 8MLOCK �� I __-........' 1 6 \ \ d1\ I \ \ 1 i SS DATE c_cmm aEvrslory [] CONIC. MARKER PROPOSED d \\ SS— — GRAVITY SEWER UNE x\ W — — WATER LINE // -- --- . 1 AN � \ \ /', ^O / _ - ..... —OE/OT— — OVERHEAD ELECTRIC/TELEPHONEIx OE/0' —ST— — STORM DRAINAGE LINE/ T _ �--�-__--_--�- // ' I ® '-- SEWER MANHOLE--'�-_„ \ � �/pt -" � I p HYDRANT -/'_/_ - SHUT-OFF --_.,______ /\ / -- / ___ _______ UTILITY .OE/°T — / O-------------- � ��v•t 1OJ POWER POLE -_______________ ES `tuts' DECIDUOUS TREES \ i' SS / ______________________________F___ _-_____--.- NEW TRANSFORMER PLAN EX. SMH \ ,' a„ pVG _ _ 'o, - 71Cr CONIFEROUS TREE � _ ____ _ - ON POLE AND DROP LINE RIM=118.72 i'{ - -" NEW 4" SDR 35 PVC UNDERGROUND TO HOUSE 0 o a EXIST. FENCE INV. IN=110.19SEWER SERVICE- WETLAND DELINEATION INV. OUT=110.48 ;— L� \ — —MIN. SLOPE-1/4"/ FT. GRAPHIC SCALE STREAM CENTERLINE i GM P 21 INv=112.0 _----- 1 \10 WYE INTO EXISTING D�Te ou.��wr, xuxnea \ \ IN FEET FEB,2010 SEWER MAIN ' ;,,.n - 10 a. I � � I 3 H TBM W FB FH 161 ' / M J. ND. ELEV.=122.2' 09222 • • •. • .• SITE ENGINEER: ACL DSM • •_ DSM THOMAS R. XATHLEEN H.EASTON i i O♦�e.�♦••♦♦ole.,.« -v`A>� �1..�!°i°i°i� �.-:w. A �i ,1� ,.,. �� ��V • • � • � i%i°`i��!i'3i``•s:+:♦i`:°i°i�o�i°ieola�i°i° �!� ��� `!� ��� •. .. . .♦.A�es ....�..u�•�s. ♦s� .,mil aso ..�♦♦.e; a0l�!ip;�i`.�o•.•.-ti. SITE PLAN %iJ�li•�°�:°%`=`=s4�u�c�°i�•ire°�D•!lc;'!vo°i0��`�=i'.�i`i'`°O!'.`ir:.��si �':•iii°i+i°�%i°o'iit�`�►°O�°�00°�°��������e�.lO�I�OyT>s�.iSio e`,l�Ap♦Ae.♦.,pA�;o `e"•� I/ `�� y.♦s,.+♦♦!�s♦s�♦�..♦��r��ti. ►<� _ sue. . sl ��s !! l s..l.♦. ��l.l:�`.°i�i°!!.:°i♦i`v�i`.°�>!'� - • 6 QHtN rINIgHf,15 rDp'.�:♦�i°i♦•i♦i'O:�':wi!;•�Oc�os��9!�t'�te�+�iiiiAO�=e:'°���•o•�+�e�p`�c�+�e�•�:i%cl�;♦3:�oi�� � • 4>♦°1.�1��>ir♦� c��>♦♦♦!i!� �. • •♦ °�•1!°�'►�� . �.♦9>j�°eO�y�J�°� �� �!°�°� �i �'��el�� ���°♦•♦>JA�>!°�°� o �� �. _ �'°♦i •''O�Di o•:'i°i i•i��'rvi'i•.� �'is���,<.>��>!°e!�! •� �l��es��%����♦s♦<.i'.�`i°i°i°i ls�0i°i+i°ii♦i°i`s'.`i:�i°. _ • ' , � : D• • ' DETAIL ��I ��♦ ♦ ♦°♦.♦♦♦11,5 �°. �, ♦♦ ♦ di�!°I�l �i����!!�. ►♦♦ �1. .♦l Aei►♦� ♦A♦♦♦A♦♦♦.r��l Al� ` ��� / �+.°♦,,.is>�., �i �si♦i,�pc°♦� .h.. t;;er ..a �, dssoi;1�'S►'0°��O♦°♦♦♦��° Ai�R • �!!! ♦.. � ♦.�:... ♦�♦ ♦ s!! •....: � i - ► • ' -. I • ! 0 e'1 � °i Iy R? 1I. �� ♦•i ♦� ° �!.� `a "..p � �.!-V A!' !♦ �! � � � :: �..+♦°!!leleA•�D �•Al1,f!♦!A♦�♦� ♦ P♦♦♦♦!e!A!!!!�♦♦A♦fi♦�� p� .♦����a+��9ati,��.�i ,sue •• 0,:` :,vs�Aeo'�i.!`9�►�♦le. ��13f�.�•.��.!!ss!! +ic�ss♦♦�as♦!♦!♦♦.,�i♦♦♦�':.`o: o.0i �►ODOi' �sp.��,s�°e�i0!io�. o•,! �.ei ���� w. � 411�'���:!.!si°°ei°a''e�i�'n�:a+i°i°i°eoi�:o'�°�:!i°e♦i°ii �•:'. �,. I � • 's°•.''.°•°0'A�.!A`!!,•wi►i,�c�'�sies•-aei°io r. .;r;�•,..:°°a���♦le������si+i°i°i°i°i°iei°♦':'Os'.'i°.°i°i:'.`OOi+Oi:�, • ♦C���.♦♦� t,.�� Aai �♦Q !!!,! •:..'� G �. ! �. �� 0�♦�i!•♦°♦elA� �1 �♦�6°!!!°!A♦°Q��°♦A4!♦♦♦°♦A♦•♦°♦•� ��: a ♦. � ♦... INLET PROTECTION a. 6 ♦'.� J�4��°C,4�V Y+♦'� �!°1/♦ ' '�y�.�! ♦A� ..,'Oe.♦♦°♦°!°!°!°♦°!♦A•l.�I►e!°!°!♦!!.°fA♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦°♦e♦ �•♦•♦°♦♦♦ _ Chi>���=�°'ei♦tdOU�t`rlje�°�°1�1� � �� �e°� R'� "`:+ii0°i0°i°i°O. `►►i°'i'D i'i':•�4!i°i°i°i°i°i+i�i i`:'i°i°:'• � .� �♦�►♦�►+♦A!♦!� � �!:•e♦!'vlO�l��,���i�'��~�� p 4 OO�A♦Oe �♦Ae!!!!!!b!!♦llliiAe♦♦♦!♦♦A•♦•♦•♦•A ♦� i. �+♦♦♦+♦A♦+♦♦.�♦AI♦♦+� ' L ♦ ♦ ♦ r e • �!! �`! ♦!+♦.. �Sl'r,' �• •'' ei,♦!%O+`s' °i° 4i�o°ii°i°i°i°i°i°iii°i°i�♦4'.+i°i°i°i°i°i`� O°i°� i �;ei:!O.°OIJ.!��c`v`atiss`i'�i• � � � � _+�. �s�.°i°o♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦!.♦♦.•♦♦♦♦♦.s!♦. \ • 'c�♦°i`�°i♦i.°isi �Oi:°Oi °°`m tr�c ` s. ��As♦!A♦♦♦A♦�.A♦♦..�♦♦♦A!s♦A♦ ♦Ow ply ! ♦���c♦�♦♦♦♦� ♦♦♦♦>!♦♦♦♦ r+♦♦!♦♦�� •: �.°+°� �0°i:°i�'e :! •!.� sip +v.� �"'ai�i�►•°e°'�7,i':.:.-._� 1:+.•:♦'�,��� ♦uses+. �. �♦�,.�01. ♦, � ., ' • • ' ��+sioi:.°i�'. �i'�°. `�`.°.r:?s. ♦ • `��,�,.� ��s°�+ii°.o•-•®•s•„•s•'y',',�!•♦°!°i°i°ieo .+°!Ae`"°a� :>h •m .- sea+. !♦Ao.c, � ► ♦.sue. �f �,n1 � �••Q�jI'� �!i♦a .�iI1��Fic1'i�i�.e�/�!� i.. EROSION CONTROL r r PLAN • c►> / • • 010 . . . �i • - 09222 EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS PART 1 - GEIERtAL, 1.01 SUMMARY Construction Activity for this project will require coverage under the State of Vermont Construction General Permit (CGP) III This site has been determined to be a "Low Risk" site according to the Risk Scoring procedure in Appendix A of CGP j3-9020. The controctm shall perform all earth disturbing activity in accordance with the "Notice of Authorization" issued with the authorization to discharge under CG#3-9020. In addition to the Erosion Control Measures prescribed in this plan set, the Erosion Control measures in the "Low Risk Site Handbook for Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control" will serve as the EPSC plan for this site. The contractor shill be Included as a on-permlttee of the construction permit. The Low Risk site handbook Is available from the VT DEC Stormwater Section at,ww.onr.state.vLus/dec/waterq/stormwoter/htm/eve-cgp.htm B. The work under this section Includes but is not limited to providing all labor, equipment and materials for the Installation of all required site related erosion control measures. If not otherwise directed an the plane, erosion control shall be In strict conformity with the latest revision of the "Low Riak Site Handbook for Eroslon Prevention and Sediment Control " available from the VT DEC Stormeater Section. 1.02 GENERAL NOTES A. The discharge of sediment laden water from the project site la prohibited. All discharged water from dewatering operations shall discharge into a temporary sedimentation basin. B. Contractor shall install all erosion controf measures as depicted on plans and details or as recommended by the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources. or Soil Conservation Service, prior to any construction. Contractor shall also be reeponsible for Inspecting and maintaining ill erosion control measures until project is completed. C. If soil disturbance will be required later than October 15th earlier than April 15, the contractor Mall be responsible for maintaining compliance with the winter atablllzatlon practices and requirements for winter construction found in the "Low Risk Site Handbook for Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control". 0. Contractor shall mark the site boundaries to identify the limit. of construction. Fence Is required an any boundary within SO ft. of a stream, lake, pond or wetland. E. All stockpile material (topsail, borrow, etc.) shall haw silt fence Installed around the downgradlent portion of the stockpile perimeter. Seed and mulch stockpiled material a. scon as possible to prevent sail -Ion and sedimentation off site. Locate stockpiles on the uphill side of Me disturbed areas, If possible. During windy conditions, stockpiled material shall be covered or watered appropriately to prevent wind erosion. F. Slopes greater than 1:3 shall haw eroelon control netting Installed to stabilize the slope and reduce the eroslon potential. Install netting over mulched elopes so that all ports ore in contract with the soil and mulch. Pin netting with wire stoples 3' o.c. to ensure full banding with soil surface. G. Install stone check dams in gross -lined .wales 50 feet on center to prevent silt from washing Into the drainage system during constructlon. Check dame shall be removed when Vegetation is established. H. Control dust through the application of calcium chloride or water. An average application of one pound of calcium chloride per square yard of exposed area should be considered for each treatment. The exact number of applications and amount of dust controller shall be based upon flMd and weather conditions. It shall be spread In such manner and by such devices that uniform distribution is attained over the entire area on which it is ordered placed. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2 01 EROSION CONTROL NETTING A. Jute netting shall consist of undyed and unbleached yam woven into a uniform open plain weave mesh. 2.02 EROSION CONTROL MATTING A. Where required on the plane or where directed by the Engineer, erosion control blankets (matting) shall be North American Green S150 for swales, and S75 for elope stabilization, or approved equal. 2.03 FILTER FABRIC A. When fllter fabric is required, It shall conform to the requirements of Mirofl 14ONS or approved equivalent. 204 CALCIUM CHLORIDE A. Calcium chloride shall conrm foto the requirements of AASHTO M 144. Either regular flake calcium chloride. Type 1 or concentrated flake, pallet or other granular calcium chloride. Type 2. may be used. 2.05 WATER A. All water used shall be clean and free of harmful amounts of oil, salt, acids, alkalies, sugar, organic matter and other substances injurious to the finished product, plant life or the establishment of vegetation. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 STONE CELL DAM INSTALLATION A. Stone check dame to be constructed and Installed as outlined In the Low -Risk Handbook or as Instructed by the Engineer. Once vegetation Is established and the check dams am no longer needed far erosion control, they shall be removed. 3.02 SILT FENCES A. The slit fences shall be constructed In accordance with the construction detail. The fence Mall generally be placed 10 feet from the toe of the slope or as Mown on the plane. The end. of the fence Mall be placed uphill to form a horseshoe shape to trap all runoff. B. The silt fences, Mall be Inspected periodically far damage or build-up of sediments. All damaged fences shall be repaired or replaced. Sediment deposits Mall be removed From the fence as they build up and be placed in an area where there is no danger of further erosion. 3.03 EROSION MATING A. Erosion matting shall be placed on all grass -lined ditches with profile grades exceeding 5.0% and Mall be placed and maintained In accordance with the Vermont Agency of Transportation Standard Specifications Sections 654 and 755.07. 3.04 RESTORATION A. As soon as construction is completed in a gi , a, it shall be topsolled, seeded, fertilized and mulcheu. 3.05 GRASS -LINED DITCHES A. All ditches that ore not stone -lined shall be topsolled, ded see, fertilized and mulched. Any area which shows signs of erosion shall be reseeded immediately and maintained until permanent vegetation is established. 3.06 TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH A. Stabilize any diversion berms or flow channels with with seed and straw mulch or erosion control matting immediately offer installation. Channels with slopes greater than 5% shall be lined with 4 inch stone. The diversion berm shall remain In place until disturbed areas are completely stabilized. 3.07 MAINTENANCE A. All erosion control measures shall be Inspected weekly and repaired and/or replaced as needed. B. All erosion control measures shall be Inspected after periods of heavy rain. C. The stabilized road entrance shall be top dressed with additional stone should the existing stone became clogged with sediment. D. Hay or straw mulch is subject to wind action. Mulch may require anchoring as, the weather conditions warrant. &OS WRITER CONSTRUCTION A. If, due to the project schedule, construction during the winter months to necessary, the Contractor shall follow the winter construction procedures outlined in the Low Risk Site Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control " as well as the following procedures: 1. Minimize disturbance between October and May. 2 All erosion control measures shall be In place prior to the ground freezing. 3. For areas to be stabilized by vegetation, seeding shall be completed no later than September 15 to ensure adequate growth and cover. 3. All non-vegetolive stabilization must be completed by October 15. 4. Where mulch is specified, apply roughly 3 Inches with an 60-90X cover. Mulch should be tracked In or stabilized with netting in open areas vulnerable to wind. TEMPORARY SEEDING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section includes: 1. Furnishing all labor, materials and equipment to complete all seeding required to provide temporary protection against wind or water erosion. 1.02 GENERAL NOTES A. Adequate seed bed preparation, use of quality seed, and timely planting are required to achieve a good stand of vegetation to control moslon. Within 48 hours of Mal grading, the exposed soll must be seeded and mulched or covered with erosion control matting.. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 GENERAL A At ciminimum, all products shall meet the requirements of Section 651 of the VAOT Standard Speciflcatians for Construction. PART 3 - EXECUTION &01 SEEDING CONDITIONS A. All essential grading and all temporary structures, such as diwrelon., dame, ditches, and drains needed to prevent gullying and reduce siltation, should be completed prior to seeding. B. All areas of disturbance must how temporary or permanent stabilization within 7 days of Initial disturbance. After this time, any disturbance in the area must be stabilized at the end of each work day. C. Stabilization le not required if earthwork is to continue in the area within the next 24 hours and there is no precipitation forecast far the next 24 hours. 3.02 S® AND SEEDING A. Seed and seeding rates may be selected from the table below. The selection will be based an the time of year the seeding is to be made and the length of time the vegetation is to ee afford the protection. The sd should be spread uniformly over the area. After seeding, the soil should be firmed by rolling or packing. Where rolling or packing is not feasible, the seed should be covered lightly by raking, disking, or dragging. B. Plant Selection and Seeding Rates: Par 1000 Species Per Acre Sq. Ft. Remarks Annual 40 lbs. 1 lb. Grows quickly, but is, of Ryegrass Mort duratiol. Use where appearances are Important. Seed early spring and/or between August 15 and September 15. Cover the seed with no more than 0.25 Inch of Boll. Perennial 30 lbs. 0.7 Ibe. Good cover which is longer Ryegrass lasting than annual ryegraes. Seed between Ap II 1 and June 1 and/or between August 15 and September 15. Mulching will allow seeding throughout the growing ..aeon. Seed to a depth of approximately .5 inch. 3.04 MULCHING A. Where it is impracticable to incorporate fertilizer and seed into moist soil, the seeded area Mould be mulched to facilitate germination. 3.05 MAINTENANCE A. If the seeding falls to grow, it may need to be re- established to provide adequate erosion control. B. It weeds became a problem, they may need to be controlled by mowing. TEMPORARY SEEDING & MULCH OR NETTING SILT FENCE INSTALLED ON DOWNGRADIENT SIDE TEMPORARY STOCKPILE DETAIL N.T.S. DIVERSION RIDGE REQUIRED WHERE GRADE EXCEEDS 2T 2:!.OR GREATER ROADWAY FILTER FABRIC SECTIOIR A - A NOTE, SANDBAGS OR SPILLWAY USE SANDBAGS CONTINUOUS BERM OF / OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS EOUIVALENT HEIGHT TO CHANNELIZE RUNOFF TO B4/IN AS REQUIRED. SUPPLY WATER TO WASH WHEELS IF NECESSARY l a ♦ .e• �;• r •♦mm) THICK PLAN NOTES 1. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE M4MTAINED IN A cova 10N TNT WQL PREWNT MACAW; OR ROWING OF SEDMENT ON70 PU&C RIGHT -OF -NAYS. MS ANY REWRE 70P DRESSING, REPAIR AVD/OR aFAV OUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRIP SEDIMENT. 2. WHEN AECESSARY, WHEELS SHALL BE CLEARED PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RAGN7-OF-WAY. J e•NEN WASHAW.' LS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE OWE ON AN AREA STA6MIZED ARM CRUSHED STONE TNT ORI/NS INTO AN APPROPED SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT 64S/N. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N.T.S. MINIMUM 1"0 ROC PLACED AROUND WARE SCREEN METAL STAKE - PLACED AROUND CATCH BASIN 12" MIN. 6" MIN. PLAN CROSS-SECTION METAL STAKE PLACED AROUND CATCH BASIN WIRE SCREEN w/ 0.5" OPENINGS THAT IS SECURED TO METAL STAKES. ATTACH TO WIRE SCREEN. FILTER FABRIC, MIRAFI 140NS OR APPROVED EQUAL WIRE SCREEN w/ 0.5" OPENINGS THAT IS SECURED TO METAL STAKES. ATTACH TO WIRE SCREEN, FILTER FABRIC, MIRAFI 140NS OR APPROVED EQUAL ,-MINIMUM 1"0 ROCK PLACED AROUND WIRE SCREEN PLACE 9" MIN. FABRIC TO BE COVER WITH ROCK CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION (WITH METAL STAKES) N.T.S. ( POSTS 1. SET POSTS AND EXCAVATE A 4"X8' ANGLE 10' TRENCH. SET POST UPSLOPE FOR DOWNSLOPE. STABILITY AND SELF CLEANING 00' 77 �' 12" MIN. B"T 3, ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO THE WIRE FENCING 2. STAPLE THE MESH FENCING WIRE POSTS. FENCING _ l - ':_ „IS 4. BACKFILL AND COMPACT TRENCH. FILTER AND EXTEND IT TO FABRIC THE TRENCH, COMPACTE SACKF LL l SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL N.T.S. FILTER FABRIC TO BE POST MIRAFI 100X OR APPROVED EQUAL 12' `FILTER FABRIC TO BE COPPED, BACKFILLED AND TAMPED 8" BELOW GRADE STEEL OR WOOD STAKES SEE CHART AT RIGHT I.INSTALL MIRIFI ENMROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUAL OR AS DETAILED HEREIN. 2. INSTALL SILT FENCES AT TOES OF ALL UNPROTECTED SLOPES AND AS PARALLEL TO CONTOURS AS POSSIBLE. THIS INCLUDES ALL FILLED OR UNPROTECTED SLOPES CREATED DURING CONSTRUCTION, NOT NECESSARILY REFLECTED ON THE FINAL PLANS. CURVE THE ENDS OF THE FENCE UP INTO THE SLOPE. REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN ACCUMULATED TO HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. SILT FENCES ARE TO BE MAINTAINED UNTIL SLOPES ARE STABILIZED. 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER, THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPESILT FFENCEAND TAPDETAIL N.T.S. '1RACWAYC' IITIN ATKHINERY UP _ AGROOWS NO OOMN T/E SLLMETCH SEED _ RAIWAIL AMTRE TRACKING CONTOUR FURROWS SURFACE ROUGHENING N.T.S. SITE ENGINEER: r CIAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC 10MANSFIELDWEWLANE, SOUTH BUPoJNGTON, VT 05403 90I Ba1=3 FAX' 902E Z271 web: caw oxin ORAIm ACL D M APPROVRD DSM OWNERS THOMAS R. & MTHLEEN H. EASTON PROJECT: EASTON PROPERTY SITE PLAN 101 HOLMES ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT EROSION CONTROL PLAN DAIR DRAINING Nr MHRR FEB.,2010 scALe AS SHOWN C_6. 1 PR Nil 09222 l TOP COURSE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1/2" R- BASE COURSE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT CRUSHED GRAVEL BASE' SUB -BASE MATERIAL �" 9 6" / 1. CURBING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN 10' SECTIONS WITH 1/8" JOINT BETWEEN SECTIONS. 2. CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIAL CONFORMING TO AASHTO DESIGNATION M-153 (1/2" SPONGE RUBBER OR CORK). CONCRETE CURB DETAIL N.T.S. 1 4" AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE 14" CRUSHED STONE (COARSE) 4" TOPSOIL `—COMPACTED SUBGRADE---_ STABILIZATION FABRIC MIRAFI 50OX OR APPROVED EQUAL DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. 11 A� L 3' 2' 2' r-4" MATCH EXISTING G ADE CULVERT END SECTION - TYPE 11 STONE FILL. (1'-0'. MIN. STABILIZATION FABRIC THICKNESS) MIRAFI 50OX OR A 6" BANK RUN APPROVED EQUAL GRAVEL PLUNGE POOL DETAIL N.T.S. i I CULVERT & END'. SECTION 1 I Arm" ❑�GRATE HAS H-10 (HEAVY TRAFFIC) ❑0❑ DOT RATING ❑OO 1 ❑ QUALITY: MATERIAL SHALL O❑11 0 CONFORM TO ASTM A48 - CLASS 308 00 ❑0 PAINT: CASTINGS ARE FURNISHED WITH A BLACK PAINT GRATE COVER IS REVERSIBLE; ONE SIDE STICKS OUT AS IS SHOWN ON THE RIGHT. ONE SIDE IS FLUSH AS IS SHOWN ON THE LEFT. L TYPE II STONE 2' 2 2' 1 2' - FILL (1' MIN. 6• THICKNESS) A -A C I i I TOPSOIL, RAKE, UNPAVED PAVED SEED & MULCH 12" CAST IRON GRATE CAST IRON GRATE RISER 12 x 12" ADAPTOR 12" HOPE STORM DRAIN — TEE INLINE DRAIN SECTION YARD DRAIN DETAILS N.T.S. TOPSOIL, RAKE,\ UNPAVED PAVED SEED & MULCH \ / — 90' ELBOW DRAIN BASIN AND INUNE DRAIN BY NYLOPLAST USA, INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTES: 1. Typical trench for drainage pipe. - 2. Compaction of backfill and bedding shall be a minimum of 90%. (95% under roadway surfaces) of maximum dry density determined in the standard proctor test (ASTM D698). APPROVED BACKFILL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED 3. Bedding material shall not be placed on frozen / IN 8" LIFTS subgrode. 4. Approved backfill shall not contain ant stones more than 6" In largest dimension, 2 maximum diameter within 2' of the outside of the pipe. D 2' or any frozen, or organic material. 5. Trenches shall be completely dewatered prior to 12" HDPE PIPE placing of pipe bedding material and kept dewatered during installation of pipe and backfill. o ,,c 6. The sides of trenches 4' or more in depth entered THOROUGHLY COMPACTED by personnel shall be sheeted or sloped to the BEDDING MATERIAL angle of repose as defined by O.S.H.A. standards. - 7. Bedding material for storm water lines shall consist of crushed stone or gravel with maximum size of 3/4" DISTURBED IL OR ROCK DNDRAIN SOTRENCH TYPICAL STORM DETAIL N.T.S. NOTES: —" 1. Typical trench for water, sewer, and drainage pipe. - 2. Compaction of backfill and bedding shall be a minimum of 90% (95% under roadway surfaces) ' of maximum dry density determined in the standard proctor test (ASTM D698). --APPROVED BACKFILL z rc THOROUGHLY COMPACTED 3. Bedding material shall not be placed on frozen 00 IN 8" LIFTS subgrode. - 2" OF RIGID INSULATION 4. Approved backfill shall not contain an stones TO BE INSTALLED WHEREVER MINIMUM COVER CANNOT more than 6" in largest dimension, 2 maximum diameter within 2' of the outside of the pipe 10 "o BE MAINTAINED INED & ALSO APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER ar any frozen, organic material. or 5. Trenches shall be completely dewatered prior to PIPE placing of pipe bedding and kept dewatered during installation of pipe and backfill. 6" -- 6. The sides of trenches 4' or more in depth entered THOROUGHLY COMPACTED by Personnel shall be sheeted or sloped to the BEDDING MATERIAL angle of repose as defined by O.S.H.A. standards. 6 - 7. Bedding material for wastewater Ines shall consist _ of 3/4" crushed atone. UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ROCK For w ter lines bedding material shall be sand. Submit a sample to the Engineer for approval. TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL WATER MINIMU BETWEI SEWER NOTES: 1. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN THE WATER LINE AND THE SEWER LINE. IF THIS SEPARATION CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, CONTACT THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR DESIGN REVISIONS. ALL REVISIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (WATER SUPPLY DIWSION). 2. MAINTAIN 10' MINIMUM SEPARATION (HORIZONTAL) BETWEEN THE SEWER UNE AND WATER LINE. 3. PROVIDE ADEOUATE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR THE SEWER/WATER LINE AT ALL CROSSINGS TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT OR ANY DAMAGE. WATER/SEWER CROSSING DETAIL N.T.S. SITE ENGINEER: f CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. 10MANSREID WEWIANE SOUTH&RUNGTON, VT OM eazae4zazT rwc eozae1-a>t web: »ww.wa,•r.oan DRA11N _ ACL CHECIRD DSM APPROVED DSM OWNERS THOMAS R. & MTHLEEN H. EASTON 111 PROJECT: EASTON PROPERTY SITE PLAN 101 HOLMES ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT Ofac ' 1QJ0 REVISION DETAILS GATE DAAIIING NUYRRR MARCH, 2010 AS SHOWN C_7 w O PROl. NO. 09222 Article mi F. Additional Standards. (i) No encroachment, including fill, new construction, substantial improvement, or other development, that would result in any increase in flood levels within the regulatory floodway during the occurrence of the base flood discharge, shall be permitted. There is an unnamed tributary on the Easton property which flows westerly into Lake Champlain. When the lake level is high (100-year flood elevation is 102) , the edge of the lake extends into the Easton property and the flood storage benefits of the stream and its surrounds become minimal. The proposed project seeks to fill a small portion of the lower elevation area that is located within the backwater flood limits of the Lake. Because the fill limits are so small, this will have no impact on the storage capabilities of the Lake. During periods when the lake is lower, the benefits of excess stormwater storage are fairly limited as the distance to the lake is so short. Since the proposed filling is not located at a narrowing or choke point of the stream corridor, there should be no impact on the stream stability after the project has been completed. (2) Within the Flood Plain District, excavation of earth products shall be prohibited in such cases where it is anticipated that such excavation will lower the level of the water table, interfere with natural flow patterns, or reduce flood storage capacity. Not applicable as no excavation of earth products is proposed. (3) All development allowed as Conditional Uses pursuant to Section io.oi(D) above shall meet the following additional standards: (a) All development shall be designed (i) to minimize flood damage to the proposed development and to public facilities and utilities, and (ii) to provide adequate drainage to reduce exposure to flood hazards. The proposed fill to be placed on the edge of the flood plain is to be placed at a 2H:V1 slope (flatter than existing conditions) and shall be stabilized with native vegetation specifically chosen to provide long term site stability. The grading has been prepared so as to provide ready drainage of the slope face and has been designed so as to provide a stable means of conveying flows from the upper plateau down to the flood plain level. (b) Structures shall be (i) designed (or modified) and adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure during the occurrence of the base flood, The proposed structure is not located in the 100-year flood plain as defined by the 102 contour. Of note is that the basement elevation is designed to be 8.5' above the 100 year flood elevation. (ii) be constructed with materials resistant to flood damage, Portions of the concrete basement foundation for the building will extend down 6 feet below the finish floor. This will still be 2.5' feet above the 100-year flood limit. (iii) be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage, This is not applicable as the building and its foundation system is located above the 100- year flood elevation. A portion of the crushed stone walkway on the north side of the proposed building is located inside the existing condition 100-year flood elevation of 102. Under the proposed conditions, the lowest portion of these improvements will be 7 feet above the 100-year flood plain. and (iv) be constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. This is not applicable as the building and its foundation system is located above the 100-year flood elevation. (c) New and replacement water supply and sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters. This is not applicable as the water and sewer services are located above the 100-year flood elevation. (d) On site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. This is not applicable as the project is served by municipal sewer system. (e) The flood carrying capacity within any portion of an altered or relocated watercourse shall be maintained. There is an unnamed tributary on the Easton property which flows westerly into Lake Champlain. When the lake level is high, the edge of the lake extends into the Easton property and the flood storage benefits of the stream and its surrounds become minimal. The proposed project seeks to fill a small portion of the lower elevation area that is located within the backwater flood limits of the Lake. Because the fill limits are so small, this will have no impact on the storage capabilities of the Lake. During periods when the lake is lower, the benefits of excess stormwater storage are fairly limited as the distance to the lake is so short. Since the proposed filling is located at a narrowing or choke point of the stream corridor, there should be no impact on the stream stability after the project has been completed. (f) New and replacement manufactured homes shall be elevated on properly compacted fill such that the top of the fill (pad) under the entire manufactured home is above the base flood elevation. The basement elevation is designed to be 8.5' above the 100 year flood elevation. Portions of the concrete basement foundation for the building will extend down 6 feet below the finish floor. This will still be 2.5' feet above the 100-year flood limit (g) The lowest floor, including basements and crawl spaces, of all new residential buildings or existing residential building to be substantially improved shall be constructed, modified, or elevated to be at or above the base flood elevation. The basement elevation is designed to be 8.5' above the 100 year flood elevation. Portions of the concrete basement foundation for the building will extend down 6 feet below the finish floor. This will still be 2.5' feet above the 100-year flood limit (h) New non-residential buildings and existing buildings to be substantially improved for non-residential purposes that do not meet the base flood elevation requirements in Section io.oi(f)(i) above shall be designed to be watertight below the base flood elevation with walls substantially impermeable and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. A permit for a building proposed to be flood proofed shall not be issued until a registered professional engineer or architect has reviewed the structural design specifications and plans and has certified that the design and proposed methods of construction are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting the provisions of this subsection. An occupancy permit for the building shall not be issued until an "as -built" plan has been submitted and a registered professional engineer or architect has certified that the building has been constructed in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting the provisions of this subsection. This is not applicable as this is not a non-residential building nor is it proposed to be located below the 100-year flood level. (i) All new construction and substantial improvements with full enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding (basements and crawl spaces) shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwater. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or meet or exceed the following minimum criteria: A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwater. If a registered professional engineer or architect certified the proposed design, an "as -built" plan of the building shall be submitted and the registered engineer or architect shall certify that the building was constructed for meeting the provision of this subsection. This is not applicable as the proposed building and all components are located well above the 100-year flood plain 102-foot elevation. iJ June 8, 1982 Mr. Maurice Boisvert 101 Holmes Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Boisvert: Be advised that your request to fill the ravine at 101 Holmes Toad has been approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustment. This letter will serve as your permit to do the fillin3. If you have any questions pertaining to this request please don't hesitate to call me. Rw/mcg Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer �,as- E LEGAL NOTICES 'OUT N BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South our. linpton Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 2e V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of , Adjustment will hold a public heoring Of the South Burlington MunlCiPOI Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, June 7, 1982 of S:00 P.M. 10 con. , Sider the following. 1. Appeal of Ilene Morgan seeking d variance, from Section 10.00, Non -conforming uses IS, structures, Section 11,00 Dimensional requlre- ments of the SOath Burlington Regulations. Request Is for per. mission to convert O existing sin• g1e fOmily dwelling into a two family dwelling on a lot containing 6,600 square feet, also requiring a waiver from Section It $0, each dwelling unit t0 contain 640 squt7N feel, at 62 Central Avenue, O C.P. 2. Appeal of L.T.H. Assorw4S, John Larkin, agent seeking a vari• Once, from Section 6.00, Permitted Uses Of the South Burlington Reg. ulations. Request is for permission 10 construct a too' to 100' two story office complex on a parcel of land containing 91,000 square feet, 10• Coled Of 1514 Williston Road bounded by Lawrence. and No. f tlonal Cash Register. 2. Appeal of David Brunelle seek. 1 Ing a variance, from Section 13.00, Non -conforming uses 6 structures, of the South Burlington Regu. f lotions. Request is for permission 10 construct a 12' to 30' addition to the rear of a single family dwell. ]no, non -conforming to the min. of imum dimensional requirements ,l`.rrfj Of 16 Orchard Road. 4. Appeal of Maurice N. Bolsvert. seeking 000roval, from Section 17.50, Filling with earth products Of the South Burlington Regu- I lotions. Request is for permission II to fill a ravine approximately twenty (20) foot In depth, which Is i located near 0 drainagewoy, 6n a i parcel of land at 101 Holmes Road. '•'�� �, ✓ .+r a r.-.r'rM- . , ,.t. S. Appeal of Merrill Jarvis seeking a`... 0 variance, from section IIAS, Multiple uses of the South hurling. ton Regulations. Request is for Permission to construct a e• to it - Photo booth (Kiosk) within the Parking area a1 the Merrill Theo, for Complex at 1212 Williston Road. Richard Ward, _�� Zoning Administrative Officer May 22, 1902, May 24, 1982 Maurice Boisvert -- 101 Holmes Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning hearing Dear Mr. Boisvert: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjsutment will hold a public hearing at the City hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, on Monday, June 7, 1982 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this hearing. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT �Nzime, address and telephone # of applicant ktllf,<z5 � �� /�✓ Cs��< s �lo� S�r{✓�'c ii✓�� � !� r� !�o`/I� 7G 9- 7;z g Name, address of property owner .B--S /.6ar'� Property location and description ��� �G-�YI�S ��, _ �Or DrJ Vea '7,V 6-iZVr ©.c .lam C ���"S ✓�f �✓J �r/� -r— C�.E _ %� f S 1 hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment },'C.r the folly � ion_` Tonal un:, , variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand ..gee meet-ags are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). T1-e legal advert., ement must appe a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay he hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. A/�J Hea nng JDate SigrLiture of Appellanz .�5-- __________Do_not_write_below_thithis ------------------------_-- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter lli, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public.hear,,,, at:. the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Strc_t, Sou Pnrlington, Vermont on , , _ (day of week) month and date t- consider the following: / Appeal of �Y71J,� ��.-,,t., e_., .,�-u :n..* �_.a . e �f seeking �w from Section /L-,6_ ' of the South 3urlington Regulations. Request is for permission to 2. r'�✓ � x ti a .a -per !ti-...t-y, ,�: � � Cr a � �-�-, L,,�, '. , w�",�" �-d--�+' �`� ••"i1.�fs"-�"- �+ (i' "'�`�"-` Q•.Q'...f/ S�Lz/B Z. v Ch. 117 MUN. & REGIONAL PLANNING & DEVEL. x T.24 § 4470 (b) On an appeal under section 4465 or 4471 of this title in which a variance from the provisions of a bylaw or interim bylaw is requested for a structure that is primarily a renewable energy resource structure, the board of adjustment or development review board or the environmental court may grant that variance and render a decision in favor of the appellant if all the following facts are found, and the finding is specified in its decision: (1) It is unusually difficult or unduly expensive for the appellant to build a suitable renewable energy resource structure in conformance with the bylaws. (2) The hardship was not created by the appellant. (3) The variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, reduce access to renewable energy resources, or be detrimental to the public welfare. (4) The variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least deviation possible from the bylaws and from the plan. (c) In rendering a decision in favor of an appellant under this section, a board of adjustment or development review board or the environmental court may attach such conditions to variances as it may consider necessary and appropriate under the circumstances to implement the purposes of this chapter and the plan of the municipality then in effect. —Added 2003, No. 115 (Adj. Sess.), § 106. HISTORY Amendments-1971 (Adj. Sess.). Amended section generally. Prior law. 1967, No. 334 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. March 23, 1968; amended 1971, No. 257 (Adj. Sess.), § 19, eff. April 11, 1972. § 4470. Successive appeals; requests for reconsideration to an appropriate municipal --panel (a) An appropriate municipal panel may reject an appeal or request for reconsideration without hearing and render a decision, which shall include findings of fact, within ten days of the date of filing of the notice of appeal, if the appropriate municipal panel considers the issues raised by the appellant in the appeal have been decided in an earlier appeal or involve substantially or materially the same facts by or on behalf of that appellant. The decision shall be rendered, on notice given, as in the case of a decision under subdivision 4464(b)(3) of this title, and shall constitute a decision of the appropriate municipal panel for the purpose of section 4471 of this title. (b) A municipality shall enforce all decisions of its appropriate municipal panels, and further, the superior court, or the environmental court shall enforce such decisions upon petition, complaint or appeal or other means in accordance with the laws of this state by such municipality or any interested person by means of mandamus, injunction, process of contempt, or otherwise. —Added 1967, No. 334 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. March 23, 1968; amended 1993, No. 232 (Adj. Sess.), § 20, eff. March 15, 1995; 2003, No. 115 (Adj. Sess.), § 107. HISTORY Amendments-2003 (Adj. Sess.). Act No. 115 deleted former subsec. (a); redesignated former subsecs. (b) and (c) as present subsecs. (a) and (b) and amended the section generally. —1993 (Adj. Sess.). Subsection (a): Inserted "of adjustment or the development review board" preceding "shall render" in the first sentence and preceding "does not render" in the third sentence and substituted "the applicant" for "him" following "requested by" in that sentence. Subsection (b): Inserted "or a development review board" preceding "may reject" and "of adjustment or the development review board" preceding "considers" and preceding "for the purpose". Subsection (c): Inserted "or the development review board" following "adjustment" and substituted "superior court, district court, or the environmental court (which in this instance is not bound by Rule 76 of the Rules of Civil Procedure)" for "courts of this state" following "further, the". ANNOTATIONS Construction, 5 Form of Decision, 8 Failure to render decision, 6 Notice, 2 Tolling, 7 Quorum, 3 Construction with other laws, 1 Failure to appeal, 10 Time for decisions, 4 Findings, 9 Purpose, 4 I. Construction with other laws. Provisions of subsection (a) of this section apply to conditional use proceedings, except where section 4407(2) of this title specifically requires a different procedure. Nash v Warren Zoning Board of Adjustment (1989) 153 Vt. 108, 569 A.2d 447. 79