Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0002 Holmes Road
40 SIM Interested Persons Record and Service List southhurlingrton '1 ER,•A0 NT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of_notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471 ). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAII Mr. Ar)nRF¢C DDn ICrrT nc IA�T�o�cT d \ v Ile h ,�1� 1� peg; clpL,L wl;'e 00' l�7J � V`r d M3 �' 1 10A GAt7,�(k— Z� �1C�tT-O "v- '16 l � �' •� - ��- � mod. xn k MO -��W 00 kU r4 ;z�eyak �- 2-16�i-� 13 ��' AaI*— lk Alic�„��.. r R i dJ Td tj a� S to�04 /A,; 4e- I -P/,ACe— Interested Persons Record and Service List southhurfingtoll HEN MONT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of.notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: IJ! — % -- ( P PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING AnnRFce oon ICf%T nr lxvvr-r -- ------- - ---.. ••.•.••.• (lb Cum S K]I s �'� V4 (� � V" (l � rw.,`�. � yr nV 1 CKCJ 1 C (q L'V 7Y7 AZ- i'M.� 110OV(G4 jM MIRA ,/O,V) Soo UJ��4e �C9 U l Bs� u d. rai-,vt Dr, 4 --2� t� ��, / - -�- v ..L Interested Persons Record and Service List H r. RMO NT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of.notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: / --- / ;7- 12- 1 o PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST L-o r /V Y64 C, �6�►s +t(,d ky Cei I -_,t,_r 3NA 81"(2 115 ®� © " •-fir rq'a do,n C'Itq e t 11 h WI SAIC Rk, -� Afe (e4ed C'f ,6zeA 6LL(Oc�+1 '1 l=.E°i'1� cr1U � C) Z t 'k u tti Un �,, ,,�1 y 1l-��•��.��'j� j�l Bait-�•'y S .� Buv � � rig VAA, v5�t u ' %'r110(/ � 0 1� s'cr I/A lava-1,� �� � 0 MJ<t, Pn(_)UO J -70 �� V, ftgrVi l ) VERMONT Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A: § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of.notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: _ % / V/6 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! KI A IIAC G IM IILIINU AUUKLSS PROJECT OF INTEREST December 8, 2010 Mr. Doug Hoar P.O. Box 2122 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on December 7, 2010 (effective 12/7/2010). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, �ce Raymond Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7010 0290 0000 2215 3460 57S Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com GilmanlEnvironmental 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5 Barre, Vermont 05641 TEL: (802) 479-7480; FAX: (802) 476-7018 gbenvironmentalnearthlink.net 7 December 2010 Ray Belair, Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Subject: Holmes Road — DRB(2) Dear Mr. Belair, This is to summarize my evaluation regarding the wetland functions and values at and near 2 Holmes Road in South Burlington. Floral Diversity. The wetland at the western end of the drainage swale at this site is characterized by a vigorous stand of common reed (Phragmites australis), a Class B noxious weed under 6 V.S.A., Chapter 84. The wetland also supports gray dogwood (Corpus racemosa), a common species on old fields and damp meadows in the Champlain Valley. The main body of the wetland ca. 150 feet to the west is scrubby wetland typical of those along the railroad in this part of South Burlington. Data taken on the western side of this wetland on 5 June 2002 by our firm (for the VELCO Northwest Reliability Project) shows that part of the wetland is dominated by narrow -leaved cat -tail (Typha angustifolia) and purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), another Class B noxious weed. In summary, this wetland rates poorly in natural native diversity, characterized as it is by species (reeds, cat -tails, loosestrife) that tend to form pure monotypic stands at the exclusion of other species. Wildlife Habitat. Wildlife expected in the wetland 150 feet or so from the encroachment would be typical of disturbed habitats and sites near human activity, limited to small mammals and birds such as red -winged blackbirds. The lack of open water and the proximity of the wetland to commercial and industrial uses, streets and the railroad limit its value for wildlife. Wildlife within the encroachment area would be minimal, if any. Fisheries Habitat. There is no open water or other habitat for fish in this wetland. Ray Belair 7 December 2010 Page 2 Flood/Stormwater Attenuation. The main part of this wetland is in a depression and therefore can store a limited amount of flood- or stormwater, subsequently releasing it into drainage channels that eventually discharge to Lake Champlain near the mouth of Bartlett Brook. Storage capacity is limited, and is restricted to parts of the wetland 150 feet or so from the encroachment, so it was not impacted. Water Quality Protection. The removal of material from the ditch along the south side of the parking lot at 2 Holmes Road prevented the material from washing into the wetland, as noted in previous correspondence (See letter from David Burke, 13 October 2010). Although not designed as a stormwater treatment facility, the ditch has functioned as one, and the removal of material could be regarded as maintenance. Shoreline Protection. There are no "shorelines" associated with this wetland. Groundwater. To my knowledge no groundwater resources were affected by the encroachment in the wetland buffer zone. Aesthetics/Recreation/Education. This wetland is not readily visible from any public vantage point except for the railroad, and because it supports populations of two noxious weed species, it has low aesthetic values. In any event, the encroachment took place outside the wetland and did not affect the its appearance. Sincerely, Errol Briggs ECB/s G'ilman & Briggs Environmental 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5 o Barre, Vermont 05641 TEL: (802) 479-7480; FAX: (802) 476-7018 gbenvironmental (c� earthlink. net 5 November 2010 Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Subject: 2 Holmes Road Dear Mr. Belair, I write in regard to removal of fill at 2 Holmes Road in South Burlington. I visited the site on 22 October, delineating the edge of the wetland to the west and taking notes on vegetation, soils and hydrology. As noted in my letter 1 November, I believe removal of sediments from the ditch and the restoration of banks should be regarded as routine maintenance of an existing man-made structure, and that the action has prevented additional sediments from reaching the wetland west of the site. Under §12.02E, encroachment into the wetland buffer may be permitted if there are positive findings that the encroachment does not adversely affect the ability of the property to carry or store flood waters adequately and that impacts from the encroachment are minimized and/or offset by appropriate landscaping, stormwater treatment, stream buffering and/or other mitigation measures. Based on my analysis of the site, it is my professional opinion that both of these provisions are satisfied at 2 Holmes Road. There is no flood water storage on or near the site, and the removal of fill, rather than adversely affecting the wetland's values and functions, has improved conditions. For these reasons, I recommend after -the -fact approval of the fill removal by the Design Review Board Sincerely, f 3 Errol C. Briggs ECB/s south PLANNING & ZONINI MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: ; Cathyann La Rose, AICP, Associate Planner 1�1 RE: Agenda Item # 7, Doug Hoar DATE: November 30, 2010 Miscellaneous application #MS-10-12 of Douglas Hoar for encroachment in a class III wetland buffer, 2 Holmes Road. The property owner has been working towards cleaning out debris and sediment from a drainage ditch on the property. This ditch is located within the 50 foot buffer of a Class III wetland on the property and is therefore subject to review under Article 12, Surface Water Protection Standards, of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The applicant has submitted a statement from a wetlands expert which has delineated the wetland and wetland buffer, and which provides an assessment of any potential impact the grading and fill work could have on the wetland buffer (see attached memo dated November 1, 2010, from Gilman & Briggs Environmental). The letter correctly states that the DRB may permit encroachment provided that such encroachment: 1. does not adversely affect the ability of the property to carry or store flood waters adequately 2. will not adversely affect the ability of the Stormwater treatment system to reduce sedimentation 3. minimizes impact to the specific wetland functions and values identified in the field report The applicant's wetland expert further testifies that the work in the Class III buffer meets criteria 1 & 2 above. However, his assessment of criteria 3 is simply stated 575 Dorset Street South Bra ngton, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax - J.846.4101 www.sburkcom that "the action can be seen as an `other mitigation measure' to address impacts." It seems logical that the work in the ditch will aid in some of the function of the wetlands, especially the transport of flood waters and other storm waters. However, the expert should testify that there is no adverse impact to the other function and values of the wetlands. That the wetland is class III and not a state jurisdictional Class II has no impact on this application as the City of South Burlington regulates both classes. (Alrn:�n & Briggs 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5 Rarre,'Vermoiit (15641 TEU (802) 479-7480; FAX: (802) 476-7018 gbenyironmental(q :1earthlink-met David Burke O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates I Corporate Drive Suite I Essex Junction, VT 05452 Subject: 2 Holmes Road 0111 impacts, althoug under icipal Land Development Regulations, work was done within the 50-foot zone. Wetland conditions at the site are as follows: The main wetland at issue is a narrow marsh between the site and the railroad. A lobe of this wetland extends toward the site, fed by flow from the ditch which has deposited sediments in a delta -like deposit. Flows tend to flow around the deposit, and there are two principal channels on the north and south sides of the wetland lobe and a less -defined channel down the center. A stand of common reed (Phragmites australis) has become established on this deposit, and because this species spreads via vigorous underground shoots, it has invaded adjacent upland as well. Terraces to the north and south of the lobe, actually topographically lower, are upland. I marked the edge of jurisdictional wetland with eight sequentially numbered flags beginning on the northerly side, The delineation was done in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2009 Interim Supplement. This methodology requires the presence of three criteria for an area to be defined as wetland: hydric soils, wetland hydrology and a predominance of wetland vegetation. I enclose copies of the Corps of Engineers Dataforms documenting my delineation. David Burke 26 October 201 it, Page 2 The western end of the ditch nearest the Class Two wetland is bounded on both sides by upland conditions — white pines (Pinus strobus) grow an the south bank and there is a stand of staghorn sumac (Rhos typhina), both facultative upland sr)ecies, a David Burke As noted above, South Burlington Land Development Regulations protect wetlands and a 50-foot buffer zone. Encroachment is permitted by the DRB when such encroachment (a) will not adversely affect the ability of the property to carry or store flood waters adequately, (b) will not adversely affect the "ability of the proposed stormwater treatment system to reduce sedimentation according to state standards", or (c) the impact of the encroachment(s) on the specific wetland functions and values identified in field delineation and wetland report is minimized or offset by appropriate landscaping, stormwater treatment, stream buffering , and/or other mitigation measures. An analysis of these provisions at the site shows that the following: Under (a), above, there is no flood water storage capacity at or near the site, so this provision does not apply. (b) does not apply because no stormwater treatment system is proposed; As noted on Page 1, the stand of common reed has become established on a "delta -like deposit" formed from sedimentation discharged from the ditch. The action at issue was removal of sediments that had built up in the ditch, thereby reducing eventual transport into the wetland. Thus, under provision (c), the action can be seen as an "other mitigation measure" to address impacts. Photo 3. View of reconfigured ditch. Small dead tree visible on right bank is a pine (an upland species) indicating that affected area was not wetland. Tall shrubs in background are staghorn sumac, another upland species. David Burke s October Page 4 In 'summary, I believe the wetland at issue is west of the disturbed area and that the ditch itself was not a jurisdictional wetland_ Further, I relieve removal of sediments from the ditch and the restoration of banks should be regarded as routine maintenance of an existing man-made structure, and that the action has prevented additional sediments from reaching the wetland west of the site. Sincere y, Errol C. Briggs Project/Site: 2 Holmes Road Cltylcounty; South Burlington/Chittenden Sampling Date: 22 OCT 10 APPlicant/Owner., DS. LILC State: Vermont Sampling Point Wetl #6 Investigator(sy Errol Briggs Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace I Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slight concave Slope (%): 3 Lat 44 25 55.5 Long: 73 12 47.75 Datum: WGS 1984 Soil Map Unit Name: Vergennes clay — NWI classification: PIEVI Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _ (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation—, Soil X or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology — naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetiand? Yes X No Welland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes, optional Welland Site 10: Remarks: (Explain aftemative procedures here or in a separate report -)-- I Weiland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators iminimurn of one is required: check all that apply)—,--__ Surface Soil Cracks (86) — Surface Water (All) X Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Drainage Patterns (B1 0) — High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Moss Trim Lines (BI 6) Saturation (A3) Mad Deposits (815) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) X_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) — Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) — Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) — Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X_ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) — Thin Muck Surface (C7) — Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) — Microtopographic Relief (D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) — FAG -Neutral Test (135) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes — No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes X Na Depth (inches): 8 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No X Aincludes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Wetland conditions have developed on upland soils due to runoff from upslope impervious surfaces, allowing invasive Phragmites australis to become established. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region — Interim Version M1 Samplinq Point: WET #6 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth -------Matrix Redox Features inches Color oc Texture --_ _Remarks 0-8 2.5Y 3/1 100 Clay loam 6-18 2.5Y 4/1 90 1 OYR 3i3 8 5Y 2,5/2 10 C M Sticky clay Slight suffidic odor "rype: C=Concentradon, D--Deplefion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains, 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydrlc Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: — Histosol (At) — Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, — 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR K, L, MLRA 1498) — Histic Epipedon (A2) MLRA 1498) — Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) — Black Histic (A3) — Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R. MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L' R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) — Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI) (LRR K, L) — Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Stratifie d ted Layers (A5) — Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) X_ Depleted Matrix (F3) — Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) — Redox Dark Surface (F6) ® Iron -Manganese Masses (Fl 2) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) — Depleted Dark Surface (F7) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FIS) (MLRA 1406) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) — Redox Depressions (F8) — esic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149S) Sandy Redox (S5) — Red Parent Material (TF2) Stripped Matrix (S6) — Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) — Other (Explain in Remarks) �lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region — Interim Version VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size._) 1. None 2. 3. 4, 5. S. 7, Sapling/3hrub Stratum (Plot size: 1Comus racemosa 2. Pinus strobus- 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: _ 1 Phragmiles australis 2, 3. 4. S. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10, If. 12. W Aody Vine Stratum (Plot size 1. None 2. 3. 4. Sampling Point: WET #6 Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 67% (A/B`) Prevalence Index worksheet- Total % Cover of—, Multi olv by: Total Cover 0131- species _ x 1 = - FACW species 100 x 2 = 200 5 X FAC FAC species 5 x3= 15 FACU species 5 x 4= 20 UPI_ species X5= 5 X FACU Column Totals: 110 (A) 235 (B) Prevalence Index = BIA = 2.14 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X Dominance Test is >50% _X Prevalence Index is 53,0' 10 = Total Cover 100 X FACW Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting — data in Remarks or an a separate sheet) — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub — Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (I m) tail. Herb —All hertaceaus (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tail. Woody vines — All woody vines greater than 3,28 ft in height. 100 Total Cover here or on a separate sheet.) = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region — Interim Version Projecvsite: 2 Holmes Road CitylCounty: South Burlington/Chiftenden Sampling Date: 22 OCT 10 Appicarit/Owner: DS, LLC State: Vermont Sampling Point: _Upl #6 investigator(s), Errol Briggs Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none}; Slight wricave Slope(%): 3 Let: 44 25 55.5 Long: 73 12 47.75 Datum: WGS 1984 Soil Map Unit Name: Vergennes clay Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X Are Vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? NN classifiration: No _ (If no, explain in Remarks,) Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No (ifneeded, explain any answers in Remarks.) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes— No X Wetta - nd Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures hem or in a separate report.) ffig== Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary In (minimum f hvo rewired) Primary Indicators (minimum of onq i —irp& rhprk nil ihat apply)' — Surface Soil Cracks (B6) — Surface Water (Al) — Water -Stained Leaves (139) — Drainage Patterns (1310) — High Water Table (A2) — Aquatic Fauna (BI 3) Moss Trim Lines (Bi 6) — Saturation (A3) — Mad Deposits (815) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) — Water Marks (1131) — Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) Crayfish Burrows (C8) — Sediment Deposits (82) — Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery (C9) — Drift Deposits (133) — Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) — Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ® Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (U) Geomorphic Position (D2) — Iron Deposits (85) — Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) w Other (Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief (134) — Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) FAG -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes — No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes — No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No _X_ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X —(includes caelitlary fringe) _ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region — Interim Version M Sampling Point -Y-P, 41 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features ALinchesj_ _—Lolor LmoAft.L_ IQQIQr (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-9 1 OYR 311 100 Silt loam 9-14 1 OYR 3/2 100 Silt loam 14-18 2.5Y 3/3 & 10YR 4t2 100 Silt loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D--Deptetion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matfix. Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'; Histosol (Al) — Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, — 2 cm Muck (Alo) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon (A2) MLRA 1498) — Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3) — Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) — Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Stratified Layers (A5) — Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (At 2) — Redox Dark Surface (F6) Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) — Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 14913) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) — Redox Depressions (F8) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 1146,14913) Sandy Redox (S5) TM Red Parent Material (TF2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 14913) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Iridicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic, Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Nortficentral and Northeast Region — Interim Version VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants, iree —Stratum (Plot size: 1 Piflus strobus 2. 3. 4. 6. 5. - Samolina Point: UPL #6 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are 013L, FACW, or PAC: 2 (A) 5 (B) 0.4 (AJB) 40 X FACU — Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of Multiply by: 40 Total Cover 061- species _ 0 X I = 0 §japjiqg/ htrgtum (Plot size: _) FACW species 10 -- x 2 = 20 1. Rhus typhina 30 X FACU PAC species 25 x 3 = 75 FACU species 400 X4= 400 2, COmusamOmum 10 X FAGW 3. Comus racemosa 5 FAC UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 135 (A) 495 (B) 4. Prevalenceindex =BIA= 166 5. 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7, — Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation — Dominanoe Test is >50% 41 Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: — Prevalence Index iss3.0' Solidagocanadensis 30 X FACU — Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 2. Equisetum arvense 25 X FAG 3. Vicia cracca Trace FACU 4. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12, Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 1. None 2. 3. 4. (include photo numbers here or on a separate 45 = Total Cover Total Cover Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be Present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: - Tree — Woody plants 3 in, (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Soplingishrub — Woody plants less than 3 in. D8H and greater than 128 ft (I m) tall. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X US Army Corps of Engineers Northoentral and Northeast Region — Interim Version m Ph *� L6010'9� south . - PLANNING & ZONING Permit # - I D - i CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE / MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ( ) Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( tier 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #): DS LLC Po Box 2122, So. burlington, VT 05407 802-658-0120 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) volume , Page 523 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone, fax #) Douglas Hoar, Po box 2122, So. burlington, Vt 05407 802-658-0120 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax #, if different from above): a. Contact e-mail address: none 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 0870-0002 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2Holmes Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): To clean out ditch at end of Parkinq Lot that has been vears. The last time it was 1 eanpd ways ahrn,i- 15 years. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Trucking Terminal c. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Same._ d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): None e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): N/A f. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): N/A h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): none 2 Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 8) LOT COVERAGE a. Total parcel size: No Change b. Buildings: Existing. Proposed Sq. Ft. _% / Sq. Ft % / Sq. Ft. c. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / Sq. Ft. Proposed % / Sq. Ft. d. Front yard impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / Sq. Ft. Proposed % / Sq. Ft. e. Total area to be disturbed during construction: Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): Grassed Ditch 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION N/A 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION N/A 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE none N/A Done 14) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). 3 Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 15) PLANS AND FEE Plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best—O my cn d2e. SIGNATURE OF DATE OF SUBMISSION: SIGNA' TY OF APPLICANT Do not write below this line I have reviewed this application and find it to be: ❑ COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete Administrative Officer Date las Hoar PRINT NAME 4 Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 �f Vermont Roi luny V.E.P. Pole ff 17B.70' 171.20° 192.94' 211.99' �t_A3_ bnd — �' t 1Ti,29° 7vM 32' � _ j n 26' 1 1 Gass Dodge - 9.60 ac, 1485 Shelburne Road Vol, 203 Pg. 20 Addition 1 Existing 1 stow grass 524,40' dnirt uric feare Existing 1 J GOW l / Pow Ieou 1 1 � 1 H 1 1 9IM H 1 1 1 1 gr . South Burl ington 1 tw�rs water Dept, Easement 1141111111+0 1 213.11B' 1� 1 1 FM1 i� '\fie t�s— 102. 0 / -� To ShelWv %%tic North True b-th 1 574.47 ----"' — , — Holres drive V.E.P. and G,H,P, r r �— , _ — r 89.5T Yol. 91 N. 217 Puff Easements 106.2.7 A77— �9155 --" : 90.19° 92.V 1 rondsM6h 1 5W.12' 1 Poved 1 woMtrmh 1 25' -. L_—\ Existirg Nn Bui IdiN Ilium 1rfr 9M hi'dres 9m 570,90' Vermont Terni m I G gwat i on - 9.06 ac . Ot l Vol, 86 Pg, 169 � 576,64' Vol. 80 N. 118 1 1 rW&ArMA purred 1 1 Tuff Haines Trucking , t Prw d W f,h, 25' 98.9� I —_--� _ ---- �i 77.917 1 1 1payd .6U � � 43.75' — ,✓� ~ _ — __._ r�� '- — lip,24 394.41' art cd ► 77.27° 102.09` Socinsk1 - 1 0.70 oc. 1 1 ien - 0.90 oc, Va1. 85 Dr. Gone - 2.44 oc. 216 Pg. 499 Pg. 25 Il 276.61' Vol. 61 Pg. 347 277.22' 298,3{Y 1 1 303,91' 1 1 02. 81° 97.19T 77,51r 102,42' ► 102.91" 77.73' }71,50'� 149.28' 1011,07' 393.66' U.S. Route v To Brrl ington 991 Crane Edward 95 Hawn Drive Po Box 1799 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Anthony Socinski 533 Tanner Road Jeffersonville, VT 05464 Two O'Briens Prop. 1475 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Farrell Distributing Corp 5 Holmes Road So. Burlington,VT 05403 DBS LLP Po Box 2122 So. Burlington, VT 05407 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 5, 1999 Tim Mack Agency Energy Products P.O. Box 240 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Re: Overnite Transportation Company, 2 Holmes Road Dear Mr. Mack: Enclosed is a copy of the October 5, 1999 Development Review minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp 1 Encl DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 5 OCTOBER 1999 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 5 October 1999, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: John Dinklage, Chair; Gayle Quimby, Roger Farley, George Chamberland, Dan O'Rouke, Garrison Roth Also Present: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator: Michael Dugan, Maria and Albert St. Amand, John Jaeger, Pauline and Frank McCaffrey, Mark Hill, D. Francis Jacobs, Tim Mack, Jim Fay, Ginny Greenblott, Paul O'Leary, Nancy Bell, Terry Harris, Brad Rabinowitz 1. Other Business: Mr. Belair presented a request for an extension of a site plan approval for the 21-unit addition to the Allen Rd. care facility. Mr. Chamberland moved to approve the 6-month extension of the site plan for the 21-unit addition to the Allen Rd. care facility. Extension is until 31 March 2000. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Approval of Minutes of 21 September 1999: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 21 September as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Dinklage abstaining. 3. Consent Agenda: a. PUBLIC HEARING: Application of Overnite Transportation Company seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to install a 3,000 gallon above ground diesel tank and pump, 2 Holmes Road. b. PUBLIC HEARING: Application of D. Francis Jacobs seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses and Section 26.65 Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow general office use and retail use in an existing building, 388 Shelburne Road. Mr. Belair gave members revised conditions for item "b." DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OCTOBER 5, 1999 Mr. Farley moved to approve the consent agenda subject to the stipulations in the Administrative Officer's memorandum of 1 October 1999. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Site plan application of Mark Hill to amend condition #7 of an approval granted on 5/11/99 to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair. The amendment consists of amending condition #7 which requires the building be sprinklered, 1691 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Dinklage read a letter from the Fire Chief indicating that in lieu of a sprinkler, the applicant has agreed to a fire alarm system that will automatically alert the Fire Department. Members had no problem with the arrangement. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Development Review Board approve the site plan application of Mark Hill to amend condition #7 of an approval granted on 5/11/99 to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair. The amendment consists of amending condition #7 which requires the building to be sprinklered, 1691 Shelburne Road, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations, which are not superseded by this approval, shall remain in effect. 2. Condition #7 of the 5/11/99 approval shall be revised to read as follows: "The applicant shall install a fire alarm system that will, upon activation, automatically transmit the alarm to a Central receiving station which will notify the fire department. This fire alarm system shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief." Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Application of Michael Dugan & Marie St. Amand seeking a use variance from Section 12.10 Permitted Uses, Commercial 1 District of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 4320 sq. ft. warehouse & storage facility, 46 Swift Street: 6. Site plan application of Michael Dugan & Marie St. Amand to: 1) raze a 1020 sq. ft. office building, and 2) construct a 4320 sq. ft. warehouse and storage facility, 46 Swift Street. 2 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 4, 1999 Tim Mack AGWAY Energy Products P.O. Box 240 Essex Junction, VT- 05453 Re: Fuel Tank, 2 Holmes Road Dear Mr. Mack: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Development Review Board on October 5, 1999. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond 1. Belair, Administrative Officer 6 1 Encl Certified letter #Z 462 927 136 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 19, 1999 Tim Mack Agency Energy Products P.O. Box 240 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Re: Overnite Transportation Company, 2 Holmes Road Dear Mr. Mack: Enclosed is a copy of the September 21, 1999 Development Review minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, , aymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RIB/mcp 1 Encl DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 SEPTEMBER 1999 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 21 September 1999, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: D. O'Rourke, Acting Chair; George Chamberland, Gayle Quimby, Roger Farley, Garrison Roth, Eric Schmitt Also Present: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator; John & Marlene Stephens, John Jaeger, Paul Morwood, Bill Nedde, Skip McClellan, Mike Gravelin, Mark Ward, Bill and David Simendinger, Bob Alexander, Jill Jones, Scott Mapes, Doug Hewitt, Tim Mack, Steve Rosencrants, D. Francis Jacobs, Adam Bortz, Leo Belval 1. Other Business: Mr. Belair advised that John & Marlene Stephens are requesting a six-month extension on a variance granted by the Zoning Board on 12 April 1999 and effective 26 April. Mr. Stephens said they have been waiting for a developer to finish some property work, and their house plans are not completely done yet so they won't be ready to build by April. Mr. O'Rourke noted it would be hard to get a variance at this time, but it has been the policy to grant a 6-month extension for an existing approval. Mr. Farley moved to grant a 6-month extension to the variance issued by the Zoning Board to John and Marlene Stephens on 12 April 1999. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Consent Agenda: a). Site plan application of Overnite Transportation Company to install a 3,000 gallon above ground diesel tank and pump on a property developed with an 8,400 sq. ft. truck terminal, 2 Holmes Road. b). Site plan application of Jill B. Jones to amend a previously approved plan for a 10,064 sq. ft. building consisting of. 1) 7114 sq. ft. of general office space, and 2) 2950 sq. ft. of medical office space. The amendment consists of converting 1085 sq. ft. of general office space to personal service space, 408-410 Shelburne Road. _ c). Site plan application of D. Francis Jacobs to amend a plan for a 5007 sq. ft. building used for radio station and retail uses. The amendment consists of converting 1100 sq. ft. of radio station use to general office use, 388 Shelburne Road. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 SEPTEMBER 1999 Mr. Chamberland moved to approve the Consent Agenda subject to the conditions in Ray Belair's memorandum dated 17 September 1999. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application of Lark -Inns, LLP, Inc., to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 200 room hotel, 60 room hotel, restaurant, and a 3-unit multi -family dwelling, 1720 Shelburne Rd. The amendment consists of removing the previously approved sewer allocation for the 60-room hotel and 3-unit multi -family dwelling: Mr. Nedde reviewed the history of the project. The PUD has 43,174 gpd allocation, and Mr. Larkin has spend $107,935 in sewer fees. They are asking to use the allocation based on peak month use of 25,820 gpd, and to remove the previously granted allocation of 3,773 gpd and apply the excess allocation to the new hotel and 3-unit multi -family dwelling. Mr. Belair said staff has no problem with this. He also noted it is unusual to have this much excess. Mr. Farley moved that the Development Review Board approve the final plat application of Lark -Inns LLP, Inc., to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 200 room hotel, 60 room hotel, restaurant, and a three unit multi -family dwelling, 1720 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of removing the previously approved sewer allocation for the 60 room hotel and three unit multi- family dwelling, subject to the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations, which are not superseded by this approval, shall remain in effect. 2. The previously approved sewer allocation of 6020 gpd is hereby removed. The applicant shall be allowed to apply 6020 of the excess allocation previously granted to the applicant for a 200 room hotel and existing restaurant located on this property. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application of Ashbrook Park Homeowners Association to amend a previously approved 17 unit planned unit development consisting of 3 buildings. The amendment consists of creating separate lots under the footprint of each unit, 701 Dorset Street: ki Memorandum - Development Review Board October 5, 1999 vicinity. The installation of this tank will result in fewer vehicle trips on public streets due to ability of the vehicles to fuel up on the premises. The proposed use will not adversely affect the bylaws in effect. This proposal is in conformance with the bylaws. The proposed use will not adversely affect the utilization of renewable energy resources. There is no such utilization in the vicinity to be affected. The proposed use will not adversely affect the general public health and welfare. Recommended Conditions: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 3) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the fuel tank. 4) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the Development Review Board. b) FRANCIS JACOBS - GENERAL OFFICE - CONDITIONAL USE This project consists of amending a plan for a 5007 square foot building used for radio station and retail uses. The amendment consists of converting 1100 square feet of radio station use to general office use in a building occupied with a retail use. The site plan was approved on 9/21/99 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 388-400 Shelburne Road lies within the C1 District. It is bounded on the north by Proctor Avenue, on the west by Shelburne Road, on the south by a standard restaurant and office building, and on the east by residences. PA MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Re: October 5 1999 agenda items Date: October 1, 1999 1) OTHER BUSINESS John Larkin is requesting a six (6) month extension (see enclosed letter) to the approval granted on March 8, 1999 (effective March 31, 1999) for a 21 unit addition to the congregate housing facility at 90 Allen Road. 3) CONSENT AGENDA a) OVERNITE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY - DIESEL TANK - CONDITIONAL USE This project consists of installation of a 3,000 gallon above ground diesel tank and pump on a property developed with an 8400 square foot truck terminal. The site plan was approved on 9/21/99 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 2 Holmes Road lies within the C2 District. It is bounded on the north by Holmes Road, on the east by commercial buildings, on the south by an auto dealership, and on the west by the railroad r.o.w. The C2 District was `formed in order to encourage general commercial activity." The proposed fuel tank and pump would be an accessory use to a commercial activity. The proposed use will not adversely affect the capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. No affect on municipal facilities is anticipated. The proposed use will not adversely affect the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located. The neighborhood includes such uses as: auto dealerships, warehouse & distribution facility, and retail uses. No adverse affect will result from the fuel tank. The proposed use will not adversely affect the traffic on roads and highway in the 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 1, 1999 Tim Mack Agway Energy Products P.O. Box 240 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Re: Fuel Tank, 2 Holmes Road Dear Mr. Mack: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 5, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, bf m RaY mod I. Be air, Administrative Officer RIB/mcp Encls li D p N Ol O UJ Cr 0 W 2 J O x 0 I I 0 FLAG POLE a SEWCY ��MG -Z 1• SIGN I ",r o E. CRANE -_� VOL. 153 PG. 106 z N /g. 4z,15ryE 1 �- ga 63 z NF A. SOCINSKI A� �� _— N 1 W.8 T. 0BRIEN C-iRl\SS Aaeq �c-�'-'VOL.85 PG.25 VOL. 216 PG. 499 ��.-'cR.1U� cA1i NQEq C��S In 1EE PPaK�w+� f'd2cA .N 0 100.41 41' N 18o z8. c � Fro � axil<x� Iwt: ovT ;y W/// bolo<•LS , . ;•Ic ck 1 F23 O�'ERHI'rE r 3 TRUCKING BLDG. 1 • �aNs ..,a�cR � Siq:•5 ipe`u,. r� v. LL C 1' r a, PARKING LOT I LEP. n 0.KtNG F\ppcct. 1•L tmQ\cyEE vcH�«FS �1 \ �cmE G.M.P. 50' WIDE EASEMENT. '(VOL.117 P.G.275 L• 20' WIDE SEWER ESSEMFNT.� 20' a-.e. y VOL. 91 P.G.162 355.80 _ F S 06° 07 40 W 9.06 ACRES VOL.88 PG.169 VOL.80 PG.118 r. : ��� •', ' �1u�.Rr .::� �c I rcRTIrY T01101 MF5 TRANSPORTATION. UK:- WORCfS1ER COUNTY S GOSS LEASING CORP. VOL. PG.330 1 I LOCATION MAP SCAI.EI24000 NOTES: 1.) PROPERTY SURVEY WAS DONE WITH A THEODOLITE. ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER, AND A STEEL TAPE. 2.) BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO MAGNETIC NORTH WITH A DECLINATION OF a 15 DEGREES WEST. 3.1 HOLMES DRIVE HAS A 60 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY, DETERMINED BY EXISTING MONUMENTATION. 41 THE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY WAS DETERMINED FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE RAILS AND THE 5.) THIS LOT DOES NOT LIE IN A FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AS DEFINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT /FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION. LEGEND: ---- PROPERTY LINE O IRON PIN FOUND p MARBLE MONUMENT FOUND qiI=IIInIAI';hi RUBBLE POWER POLE 0 CATCH BASIN O WATER VALVE 24 HYDRANT POINT ON LINE 0 IRON PIN NOT FOUND V.T. ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY EASEMENT. w ` VOL.117 P.G.183 V ME NT IS N82°52'30"W, 2.29' FROM PFOPER1 Y CORNER AUG 2 0 1999 City of So. Burlinp�ton o O aP o 0 2 a o t o c o '.. i SURVEY PLAT PROPERTY OF HOLMES TRANSPORTATION INC. 9/88 SJM TITLE BLOCK NOTE 5 TRANSPORTATION, INC. WWII! RevlaloN Ja)TH MIq_NBTMI I VERMONT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 17 , 1999 Tim Mack Agency Energy Products P.O. Box 240 Essex Junction, Vermont 05453 Re: Fuel Tank, 2 Holmes Road Dear Mr. Mack: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting including my comments to the Board. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 21, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, /avymb-nd J. Belair, Administrative Officer RIB/mcp Encls FROM : Panasonic FAX SYSTEM PHONE HO. ' Apr. 03 1-990 00:59RM P1 TFAGWAY r p Ow a 0 A Vwo i�,,R m 7 ,�: OVESHEET AGWAY PROPANE, PU BOX 48,52, SYRAFLAI'- F Agway Energy Tim Rack P, 0, Box 240 Easex.Jet., VT OW3 (802) 654-7839 (602) 343-9832 car Company Ncmel Rrmennwr, el Soci&6 South Burlington City Zoning Office L _ _ _South H,011dom vonlA I'ahomtiam de - CD t - -- I I-QU /Dwe tlrgentl Reply ASAP I [jj Please Commcn& OX Please Roviewl Drjhgendf mdCkanmmTv Ededigungl OberPrUfUnol KennInisnahm.21 urvnf R41pome ur"afe canurmntairec A v6rffiw Copk pour kwonva6w aftendue aftodus MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington v opment Review Board From: Raymond J. Belai , ministrative Officer Re: September 21, 1999 agenda items Date: September 17, 1999 1) OTHER BUSINESS John and Marlene Stephens are requesting a six (6) month extension (see enclosed) to the variance granted them by the Zoning Board of Adjustment on 4/12/99 (effective 4/26/99). The variance granted was to demolish an existing residential dwelling and detached garage, and replace with a 35' x 48' two story dwelling unit located within nineteen (19) feet of elevation 102.5 feet of Lake Champlain and a detached 24' x 30' two story garage with guest quarters (living room, bedroom and bath) to within four (4) feet of the front yard and one (1) foot of the northerly side yard, located at 5 Austin Road (see enclosed decision). This variance was needed because the property is located within the C.O. District along the lake. 2) CONSENT AGENDA a) OVERNITE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY - FUEL TANK - SITE _PLAN This project consists of the installation of a 3,000 gallon above ground diesel tank and pump on a property developed with an 8400 square foot truck terminal. This property located at 2 Holmes Road lies within the C2 District. It is bounded on the north by Holmes Road, on the east by commercial buildings, on the south by an auto dealership, and on the west by the railroad r.o.w. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 44 foot curb cut on Holmes Road. This property also has a r.o.w. which connects the dealership property to the south with Holmes Road. No changes proposed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Memorandum September 21, September 17, Development Review 1999 agenda items 1999 Coverage/setbacks: Coverage will not change as a result of this application. Setback requirements are met. Parking: No additional parking spaces required. Existing parking is adequate. Landscaping: There is no minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, for this project. No additional landscaping recommended. Traffic: No additional traffic is anticipated. Sewer: No additional allocation needed. Dumpster: The dumpster storage area will be screened by a stockade fence. Recommended Conditions: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 3) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the fuel tank. 4) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the Development Review Board. b) JILL B. JONES - PERSONAL SERVICE - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved plan for a 10,064 building consisting of: 1) 7114 square feet of general office space, and 2) 2950 square feet of medical office space. The amendment consists of converting 1085 square feet of general office space to personal service space. The last review of this property by the Planning Commission was on 8/24/99 (minutes not available). This property located at 408 - 410 Shelburne Road lies within the C1 District. It is bounded 2 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, October 5, 1999, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Application of South Burlington Realty Company seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses and Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to use an existing building for a multiple number of uses, 366 Dorset Street. 2) Final plat application of Fairway Estates, LLC to amend a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 298 residential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of resubdividing lots #1, 2 and 32 - 37, Nowland Farm Road. 3) Final plat application of MLB Associates, LLC to amend a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 161 single family lots and 60 multi -family units. The amendment consists of resubdividing 92 lots and eliminating one (1) lot, Dorset Farms, Dorset Street. 4) Final plat application of Homestead Design, Inc. to amend a planned residential development consisting of 298 residential units and an 18 hole golf course, Dorset Street. The amendment consists of revising the plat for the footprint lots along Golf Course Road by providing survey tie lines for the next phase of development (units 115 - 117 and 138 and 139). 5) Application of Michael Dugan & Marie St. Amand seeking a use variance from Section 12.10 Permitted Uses, Commercial 1 District of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 4320 square foot warehouse & storage facility, 46 Swift Street. 6) Application of Overnite Transportation Company seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to install a 3,000 gallon above ground diesel tank and pump, 2 Holmes Road. 7) Application of D. Francis Jacobs seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses and Section 26.65 Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow general office use and retail use in an existing building, 388 Shelburne Road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board September 18, 1999 M Development Review Board will hold a: public hearing at the South Bur- lington .City. hall,".Confer- ence Room, '675'.Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on . Tuesday, October 5, 1999, ftt 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1] Application ,of South Burlington Realty Com- pany Seeking conditional use approval from Sec-. tion 26.05, Conditional Usep and Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request; is for permission to use an existing ,building for a Multiple number Hof used, 36.6 Dorset Street 2 Final', plat appplication o Fairway Este a, to amend a.p.reviously ap- P�roved planned residen, tlal developpment consis- ting of 298' residential units and an 18, hole golf .course. The amendment. consists of resubdividing lots 41, 2 and 32-37, Nowland Farm Road: 3l Final plat application o . MLB Associates, LLC to amend a previously approved planned, rest- dential development con- sisting of 161 sin It tam- Ily 'lots and 6 multl= family units: The emend - merit consists of resubdi viding. 92• lots .arid: eliml= nating one [11 lot, Dorset Forms, Dorset Street. 4 : Final plat application o� Homestead Design, inc..to amend a pplanned residential development consisting of 298 real- dential units and an 18 hole golf course,"Dorset Street. The amendment consist$ pf rev! i9ing the plat for the footprint lota# along Golf Course Road by providing survey tie lines for the next phase ` of f development. [units 115-117 ., and .138 and, •139.]. . 5] App"cation 6'Michael Dugan i3 Marie St. Amend seeking; a use variance. from . Section 12.10 Permitted Uses, Commercial 1 District of the South . Burlington Zoning Regulations, As - quest is ; for permisslon to construct a 4,320 square foot warehouse, & storage. facility t;46-Swift Street. 6] Application of Over- nite, Transportation Com- pany Seeking conditional use approval from $to- tlorl. '26:05, Conditional Uses of the, South Bur- lington . Zoning Oeguls lions. Request is for per- mission to;instaii s 3,000 gallon above. round die - sal tank and p6mp, 2 Holmes Road. 7.1 Application of D. Francis ,Jacobs seeking .conditional use approval from Section 26,05, Con- ditional Uses and Sec- tion 26.65 Multiple Struc- tures and Uses on"Lilts, of the South Burlington '.Zoning Regulations. Re- -et Is for -permission to eiloW general office use _1 .ei ri 0" In nn existing building, '388 Shelburne Road. Copies .of the applica-;,, lions are .available for ppublic; Inspection 'at the South`Burlington City Hall. ,John.pinklage Chairman South Burlington Development Review , Board September 18, 1999 dam- qob � 1�56 = CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR 1) Q004C SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) �)Ucm-,Af_ o", 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) �m\� . goy 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1�e1rr, : � . _ So t1, nq-,\nta vr c wpa 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) �? - O 1 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) r:. b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain)¢>S�,�l t c c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed):' g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed c) Front yard (along each street) 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ b) Landscaping: $ Existing % Proposed % c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (in and out): 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: 0 Development Review Board ® Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ® Incomplete 9> of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (Apfrmsp) s EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. • Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) • Survey data (distance and acreage) • Contours (existing and finished) • Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations • Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping • Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways • Zoning boundaries • Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) • Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) • Location of septic tanks (if applicable) • Location of any easements • Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard • North arrow • Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date • Exterior lighting details (must be down casting and shielded) • Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) • Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations • If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE New Application $ 60.00* ® Amendment $ 35.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee (Apfrmsp) rQ �Y July 15, 1999 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Attn. Tim Mack Agway Energy PO Box 240 Essex Jet., Vt. 05453 Fire Prevention National Life Bldg. Drawer 20 Montpelier Vermont 05620.3401 T. 802.828.2106 F. 802.828.2195 REGIONAL OFFICES: 430 Asa Bloomer State Office Bldg. Rutland Vermont 05701 T. 802.786.5867 F.802.786.5872 RE: Overnite Transportation - Installation of a 3,000 gallon aboveground storage tank Location: 2 Holmes Road, So. Burlington Site Number: 59274 Dear Mr. Mack: A site plan and application were received on July 1, 1999, and reviewed on July 15, 1999 for the diesel storage tank. Installation of the storage tank is approved with the following conditions: 1- 2- P.O. Box 280 Springfield / 3- Vermont 05156 V T. 802.886.2712 F. 802.886.2719 19 Commerce St. Williston Vermont 05495 T. 802.658.2199 F. 802.863.7410 71 Washington St. Suite 100 Barre Vermont 05641-4210 T. 802.479.4434 F. 802.479.4446 4- The concert barriers provided on the south end of tank must also be provided on any portion of the tank that can be in contact with a vehicle. Based on the site plan, additional barriers are required. NFPA 30A 2-4.7.1 The tank must be properly labeled, identifying the product name and flammability. NFPA 30A 9-9 The tank must be double wall construction so that any accidental discharge will be prevented from reaching waterways or endangering important buildings. NFPA 30 2-3.4.1 Electrical wiring must be done by a Vermont licensed electrician and requires a permit to be filed with this office. Upon completion of the tank, please notify this office for a final inspection of the project. (658-2199) Respectfully, a P'7wz�'- Robert A. Patterson Williston Regional Manager INSPECTION REQUEST Site No: 7 y Reviewer: Frer-sv„ Name of Project: 6yer-41'FQ. i (-a11s a4r-(a I rn � Address: �? 14611)i.es �2a SO , Ba! l A,4-6,1 Pursuant to Section 6(g) of the 1994 Vermont Fire Prevention and Building Code, I request a representative of the Department of Labor & Industry to inspect the premises on or before the following date: MPORTANT: The date you have requested are responsible to call the regional inspector in advance to confirm this appointment. (Signature of Owner or Representative) is NOT confirmed. You at least five working days - gA.-- 0c Telephone Number All of the blanks above must be filled out in order to schedule your final inspection. PLEASE MAIL TO: Department of Labor & Industry Fire Prevention Division 19 Commerce Street Williston, VT 05495 City of South Burlington Official Use Application to Development Review Board APPLICATION # Ll ,%�I DARING DATE _ "/ FILING DATE FEE AMOUNT b� rso M-11 Represented by r Telephone # Landowner l,.t�U�ti(`` n1-c— J� Location and description of property Adjacent property owner(s) & Address Type of application check one: ( ) appeal from decision of Administrator Officer 04 request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing and I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Describe request: Other documentation: MIA� 1f I. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, , at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Application of seeking a from Section of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to