HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 07_SD-19-32_47 Tilley Dr_Pizzagalli#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
1
1 of 15
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
SD‐19‐32_47 Tilley Dr_Pizzagalli_2019‐12‐17.docx
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
Report preparation date: December 11, 2019
Plans received: October 31, 2019
47 Tilley Drive
Preliminary and Final Plat Application #SD‐19‐19
Meeting date: December 17, 2019
Owner/Applicant
Pizzagalli Properties, LLC
462 Shelburne Road, Suite 101
Burlington, VT 05401
Engineer
Donald L. Hamlin Consulting Engineers Inc.
136 Pearl Street
Essex Junction VT 05452
Property Information
Tax Parcel 1718‐00047
Industrial Open Space Zoning District
1.01 acres
Location Map
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Preliminary and final plat application #SD‐19‐32 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, to construct an
approximately 2,500 sf single story short order restaurant and retail sales building on one acre and
potentially construct traffic mitigation at Tilley Drive and Hinesburg Road, 47 Tilley Dr.
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
2
2 of 15
PERMIT HISTORY
The property was subdivided in 2008 as part of a three‐lot Planned Unit Development (#SD‐18‐48). The
reason the subdivision was subject to PUD standards is the applicant wished for the subject parcel to be
smaller than the minimum size of 3 acres within the industrial open space zoning district. No other
dimensional waivers were sought. A small number of conditions of that approval affect this application,
described under Master Plan below.
The Board reviewed the sketch plan application for this project on July 2, 2019.
COMMENTS
Development Review Planner Marla Keene and Director of Planning and Zoning Paul Conner (“Staff”)
have reviewed the plans submitted on 10/31/2019 and offer the following comments. Numbered items
for the Board’s attention are in red.
CONTEXT
The project as presented will be subject to PUD review and site plan review. The property is located in
the Transit Overlay District and the Traffic Overlay District Zone 3. This is the first site plan application
for the property.
ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Setbacks, Coverages & Lot Dimensions
Industrial Open Space District Required Proposed
Min. Lot Size 1 acres2 1.01 acres
Max. Building Coverage 30% 6%
Max. Overall Coverage 50% 43%
@ Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 25 ft.
1
Min. Side Setback 35 ft. >35 ft.
Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. N/A
Max. Front Setback Coverage 30% 17%
Height (pitched roof) 40 ft. 28 ft. 7 in.
3
1. The applicant has requested a front setback waiver to 25 feet. As part of a PUD the Board has the
authority to grant a front setback waiver. Staff recommends the Board consider whether they
would grant such a waiver. Staff supports the applicant’s request for waiver for several reasons,
including to better frame the corner and to give motorists on Hinesburg Road a visual cue they are
entering a more densely populated area. At sketch, the Board indicated they had no issues with the
waiver request.
2. Reduced from standard dimension as part of PUD SD‐08‐48
3. Calculated by Staff based on the average between the eaves and the highest point of the roof,
which in this case is the cupola, per definition of height.
2. The applicant is proposing to access the development via a shared driveway with the adjacent parcel.
Staff notes the applicant must apply for separate site plan approval for the portion of the development on
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
3
3 of 15
the adjacent parcel. Staff notes this approval can be administrative, and recommends the Board require the
applicant to obtain such approval prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the current application.
6.04 Industrial Open Space District (IO)
The purpose of the IO district is, in part, to provide suitable locations for high‐quality large‐lot office, light
industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington
International Airport. retail is permitted as long as the use is limited to 5,000 sq. ft. per tenant. Retail sales
is defined in all districts as follows.
Retail sales. An establishment engaged in selling goods, groceries, or merchandise to the
general public at retail or wholesale for personal or household consumption or for business use
and rendering services incidental to the sale of such goods. Typically such an establishment (A)
is a place of business and is engaged in activity to attract the general public to buy, (B) buys and
receives as well as sells merchandise, (C) may process or manufacture some of the products for
sale, such as a jeweler or baker, but such production or manufacture is incidental and
subordinate to the selling activities, and (D) sells to customers for their own personal,
household, or business use. Such an establishment may have a short order restaurant as an
accessory use with the following limitations on the short order restaurant: 1) it must be located
entirely within the principal structure and with no dedicated exterior entrance of its own; 2) it
is limited to 3,000 square feet 3) it is limited to sixteen (16) or fewer indoor seats; 4) Additional
seasonal outdoor seating may be permitted in conjunction with this accessory short order
restaurant. A Wholesale Club is considered to be Retail Sales in these Regulations.
At Sketch, Board members were divided on whether the definition of retail, which is applicable to all zoning
districts, meant that the proposed short order restaurant was permitted provided it meets the criterion
embedded within the definition of retail sales. Some members felt that because the IO district specifically
restricts short order restaurants to accessory uses, any short order restaurant must meet additional
limitations on accessory uses set forth in the standards for the IO district, regardless of whether it is
embedded within a qualifying retail sales use. Accessory uses are defined in all districts as follows.
Accessory Use. A use of land or property or a building, or a portion thereof, whose area, extent,
or purpose is incidental and subordinate to the principal use of the building or land. The
accessory use shall be located on the same lot. An accessory use shall not be accessory to
another accessory use.
Accessory uses within the IO district are limited by the following additional standards.
F. Accessory Uses in the IC and IO districts. In the IC‐Mixed Industrial Commercial and IO‐Industrial
Open Space districts, those uses designated ‘P‐ACC’ in Table C‐2, Table of Uses shall be subject to
the following standards and limitations:
(1) Such accessory uses shall be located wholly within a permitted principal structure.
(2) Access to the accessory use shall only be from within the principal structure.
(3) Such uses shall be included in the calculations of required parking, vehicle trip ends, and
wastewater allocations through an umbrella permit approval or other DRB approval.
(4) The total gross floor area of all such accessory uses shall be limited to ten percent (10%) of
the gross floor area of the principal structure. The owner of the building or responsible
condominium association shall be responsible for allocation of any such floor area among
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
4
4 of 15
accessory and principal uses.
(5) No individual accessory use may exceed 3,000 SF in gross floor area except for retail food
establishments, which shall not exceed 5,000 SF GFA.
(6) Other accessory uses that are wholly internal to a principal permitted use (e.g. employee
cafeterias, employee fitness rooms, hospital pharmacies) pursuant to this Section shall not
require specific approval and shall not be counted towards the ten percent square footage
limitation.
3. Staff considers that the above limitations on accessory uses within the IO district only apply to uses not
within a retail use, and the criterion outlined in the definition of retail sales are met. Staff recommends
the Board have a robust discussion of whether they concur with Staff. Should the Board choose to apply
the accessory use criteria instead, the short order restaurant would be limited to 10% of the total area of
the proposed building, equal to 240 square feet, which the applicant indicated at sketch would not be
tenable. The applicant may not wish to proceed without a positive finding on the short order restaurant.
6.05 Supplemental Standards for Industrial and Airport Districts
A. Site plan or PUD review required. Development according to industrial and airport district
regulations shall be subject to site plan or planned unit development review as specified above, the
purpose of which shall be to encourage innovation of design and layout, encourage more efficient
use of land for development, promote shared parking opportunities, provide coordinated access to
and from commercial developments via public roadways, and maintain service levels on public
roadways with a minimum of publicly financed roadway improvements.
This application is for a PUD. Vehicular access is proposed to be off Tilley Drive, as was required by
the initial subdivision for the property. Impacts on traffic are discussed below. Staff considers this
criterion met.
B. Multiple structures and uses permitted. Multiple structures, multiple uses within structures, and
multiple uses on a subject site may be allowed, if the Development Review Board determines that
the subject site has sufficient frontage, lot size, and lot depth. Area and frontage requirements may
be met by the consolidation of contiguous lots under separate ownership. Construction of a new
public street may serve as the minimum frontage requirements. Where multiple structures are
proposed, maximum lot coverage shall be the normal maximum for the applicable districts.
Only one structure is proposed. Staff considers this criterion met.
C. [Reserved]
D. Buffer strip. Properties in the Airport, Mixed Industrial Commercial, Industrial Open Space and
Airport Industrial districts that abut residential districts shall provide a screen or buffer along the
abutting line, as per Section 3.06(I) (buffers).
The property abuts a residential zoning district to the west, on the far side of Hinesburg Road. 3.06I
applies to non‐residential use within 50 feet of the boundary of a residential district. Because of the
intervening roadway, this criterion does not apply.
10.02 Traffic Overlay District
The property is located within Traffic Overlay Zone 3. Zone 3 regulations only apply to parcels with private
driveways or culs‐de‐sac. The applicant is proposing to access this property via Tilley Drive. The street
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
5
5 of 15
which is subject to the Traffic Overlay Zone regulations is Hinesburg Road. Staff therefore considers the
Traffic Overlay District regulations do not apply to this project assuming the property continues to be
accessed off Tilley Drive. At sketch, the Board discussed that they concurred with Staff’s assessment.
4. Staff recommends the Board confirm their concurrence at this stage of review.
10.05 Transit Overlay District
The purpose of the transit overlay district is, in part, to provide for a safe, compact and efficient land use
pattern that supports regular fixed‐route transit service, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. The
applicant is proposing to include a 8‐foot wide recreation path along the front of the property, which will be
able to connect to additional segments of recreation path planned for when improvements at the Old Farm
Road intersection are made. The applicant has also provided a street‐facing patio area to activate the Tilley
Drive side of the building. Staff considers the purpose of the Transit Overlay District to be met.
PUD STANDARDS
(1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the
project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City
water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit
from the Department of Environmental Conservation.
The applicant has provided a letter prepared by a professional engineer estimating the water
and sewer demand to be 555 gallons per day. They have received preliminary water allocation
and applied for preliminary wastewater allocation. Staff considers this criterion to be met.
(2) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during construction and after
construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous
conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the DRB
may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for
Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation.
The applicant has provided an erosion prevention and sediment control plan (Sheet 3) and detail
plan (Sheet 6). Staff considers this criterion met.
(3) The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to
prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. In making this finding the DRB may rely
on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical
review by City staff or consultants.
As part of the most recent Act 250 amendment (4C1153‐7) for Mountain View Office Park
(encompassing Tilley Drive), the applicant has performed a traffic impact study which, based on
projected traffic for the recently approved and under construction on the eastern end of Tilley
Drive, recommended construction of a left turn lane into Tilley Drive from southbound on VT
116/Hinesburg Road and found a traffic signal met two warrants. It also recommended
installation of a left turn lane into John Fay Road though this recommendation appears to be
based on the presence of a space reserved for such a turning movement and not on actual
traffic warrants. At the time of the Act 250 approval for that project, VTrans recommended
construction of the two left turn lanes but that the traffic signal not be installed.
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
6
6 of 15
The applicant’s engineer estimates that the project will generate 31 new vehicle trips and 55
pass‐by trips. The applicant has not provided backup information for this calculation.
Staff and the applicant met with VTrans on December 10, 2019 to discuss the mitigation at VT
116. In particular, they discussed the addition of a sidewalk crossing to accompany the traffic
signal, and the timeline for installation of the signal. Staff is working with the applicant towards
a memorandum of understanding which will establish a timeline for installation of the traffic
signal. Such MOU is also planned to include installation of a crosswalk between the existing
recreational path on Tilley Drive and the sidewalk on the west side of Hinesburg Road at the
same time as a signal is installed.
This discussion also applies to site plan criterion G, requiring compliance with Section 15.12 of
the LDRs pertaining to access management and traffic safety.
(4) The project’s design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams,
wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on
the site. In making this finding the DRB shall utilize the provisions of Article 12 of these
Regulations related to wetlands and stream buffers, and may seek comment from the Natural
Resources Committee with respect to the project’s impact on natural resources.
There is a small area of Class III wetland buffer impact associated with the proposed parking lot.
SECTION 12.02 WETLAND PROTECTION STANDARDS
(1) Consistent with the purposes of this Section, encroachment into wetlands and buffer
areas is generally discouraged.
(2) Encroachment into Class II wetlands is permitted by the City only in conjunction with
issuance of a Conditional Use Determination (CUD) by the Vermont Department of
Environmental Conservation and positive findings by the DRB pursuant to the criteria in (3)
below.
(3) Encroachment into Class II wetland buffers, Class III wetlands and Class III wetland
buffers, may be permitted by the DRB upon finding that the proposed project’s overall
development, erosion control, stormwater treatment system, provisions for stream
buffering, and landscaping plan achieve the following standards for wetland protection:
The applicant is proposing an unknown square footage of Class III wetland buffer impacts.
The buffer is being impacted for the purpose of constructing a parking lot.
(a)The encroachment(s) will not adversely affect the ability of the property to carry or store
flood waters adequately;
The proposed impacts are a small portion of the overall wetland. The parking area is
proposed to drain away from the wetland. Staff considers this criterion met.
(b)The encroachment(s) will not adversely affect the ability of the proposed stormwater
treatment system to reduce sedimentation according to state standards;
The Assistant Stormwater Superintendent reviewed the plans on November 15, 2019
and provided comments which the applicant addressed. The Assistant Stormwater
Superintendent’s comments are included under PUD Criterion 11. There were no
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
7
7 of 15
concerns pertaining to this criterion. Staff considers this criterion met.
(c) The impact of the encroachment(s) on the specific wetland functions and values
identified in the field delineation and wetland report is minimized and/or offset by
appropriate landscaping, stormwater treatment, stream buffering, and/or other
mitigation measures.
5. The applicant has provided documentation that ANR has classified the impacted
wetland as Class III because it under 0.5 acres in size, and isolated. No statement has
been made as to the functions and values of the wetland. Staff recommends the Board
require the applicant to quantify the area of impact and provide a statement of the
functions and values of the wetland in order to allow the Board to evaluate
compliance this this criterion.
(5) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in
the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in
which it is located.
As noted at sketch, the applicant has tried to move away from generic convenience store
architecture to something that reflects the history of the area. Staff considers the proposed
architecture serves as an appropriate transition between the residential nature of the
surrounding area of Hinesburg Road and the industrial nature of Tilley Drive.
The applicant has provided renderings showing the proposed building from Tilley Drive and from
the intersection of Tilley Drive and VT 116/Hinesburg Road. Staff notes for the Board’s information
that the landscaping shown on the renderings is not consistent with the proposed landscaping.
Parking is located to the side and rear of the proposed building. The project does include a 30‐foot
wide driveway, which is discussed elsewhere in this document.
The planned development patterns in this area as specified on Map 11 in the Comprehensive Plan
are of Medium to Higher Intensity – Principally Non‐Residential. The purpose of the industrial open
space district is discussed above. Staff considers this criterion generally met.
(6) Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities
for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas.
At the initial PUD approval for the property, the Board deferred comments on this criterion
because no development was proposed. Staff considers the proposed development uses much
of the available parcel, though the remaining lots in the PUD are still not proposed for
development.
6. Staff considers the proposed lot configuration neither enhances nor detracts from this criterion,
and recommends the Board discuss it.
(7) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to
insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for approval
including, but not be limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular
access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure,
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
8
8 of 15
and number and location of hydrants. All aspects of fire protection systems shall be designed
and installed in accordance with applicable codes in all areas served by municipal water.
Fire Inspector Ed Spooner reviewed the plans on December 10, 2019 and requested
demonstration that the applicant demonstrate that a fire truck can navigate the parking lot, and
that the interior parking lot islands have mountable curbing at the ends. Staff considers the
curbs should not be fully mountable in order to comply with the requirement for tree
protection.
7. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to demonstrate compliance with the
comments of the Fire Inspector prior to closing the hearing.
(8) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting
have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and
infrastructure to adjacent properties.
Stormwater is discussed below under PUD Criterion #11.
The applicant has submitted a photometric lighting plan indicating lights will be pole mounted
20‐feet above grade, which is below the maximum allowable height of 30‐feet. Light levels are
below 2 foot candles, with an average light level of 0.83 foot candles.
Utilities and landscaping are discussed under 14.07B and 14.07D below, respectively.
The Director of Public works reviewed the project on November 11, 2019 and offers the
following comments.
Please provide justification for the driveway turning radii.
Please remove detectable warning strips where a driveway crosses the rec
path/sidewalk.
As noted at sketch, the applicant has proposed a 30‐foot wide driveway for the Project. The
maximum allowable commercial driveway is 36‐feet, intended to allow for significant truck traffic,
which is not the proposed use of this property. Pavement width for private roadways is required
to be 20‐feet.
8. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to comply with the comments of the Public
Works Director and narrow the driveway to a maximum of 24 feet.
This comment also applies to the Site Plan Review Standard pertaining to roadway standards.
(9) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is
consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific
agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City
Council.
The applicant has proposed an 8‐foot wide recreation path along the west side of the property
which will connect into future improvements at Old Farm Road and north. Interior sidewalks
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
9
9 of 15
are 5‐feet wide and the main entrance sidewalk is 10‐feet wide. Staff considers this criterion
met.
(10) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for
the affected district(s).
The Goals of the comprehensive plan are
1. Affordable & community Strong. Creating a robust sense of place and opportunity for
our residents and visitors.
2. Walkable. Bicycle and pedestrian friendly with safe transportation infrastructure.
3. Green & clean. Emphasizing sustainability for long‐term viability of a clean and green
South Burlington.
4. Opportunity Oriented. Being a supportive and engaged member of the larger regional
and statewide community.
The project is located in the northeast quadrant, whose objectives as stated in the comprehensive
plan are to allow opportunities for employers in need of large amounts of space provided they are
compatible with the operation of the airport, and to provide a balanced mix of recreation, resource
conservation and business park opportunities in the south end of the quadrant. This commercial
establishment, as part of the PUD, will address a need for services nearby to all of the places of
employment on Tilley Drive. Staff considers that the proposed use supports balanced uses in the
south end of the quadrant. Staff considers this criterion met.
(11) The project’s design incorporates strategies that minimize site disturbance and
integrate structures, landscaping, natural hydrologic functions, and other techniques to
generate less runoff from developed land and to infiltrate rainfall into underlying soils and
groundwater as close as possible to where it hits the ground.
The Stormwater section reviewed the plans on 11/15/2019 and provided comments to the
applicant. On 11/15/2019, the Stormwater Section indicated their only remaining comments
are as follows.
1. This project is located in the Potash Brook watershed. This watershed is listed as stormwater
impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Also,
the project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of land. It will therefore require a
construction permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should
acquire this permit before starting construction.
2. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all
stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure.
9. Staff recommends the Board include the Stormwater Section’s comments as conditions of
approval.
SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
14.6 General Review Standards
Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general
review standards for all site plan applications:
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
10
10 of 15
A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due
attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use
policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan.
Compliance with this criterion is discussed under PUD Criterion #5 and #10 above.
B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site.
(1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement,
and adequate parking areas.
The applicant is proposing a vertical siding type in a red color with a standing seam metal roof.
Plantings are generally proposed between the proposed parking lot and the residential property to
the north, with two additional trees on the driveway and a few trees around the proposed building.
Adequacy of landscaping is discussed under site plan review standard D below. They have
proposed a pedestrian connection between the building and the existing recreation path on Tilley
Drive, as well as a significant pedestrian oriented patio area between the building and Tilley Drive.
Aside from comments on landscaping, discussed below, Staff considers this criterion met.
(2) Parking:
(a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a
public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection.
Staff considers this criterion met.
(3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and
scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining
buildings.
Staff considers the proposed building height and scale creates an appropriate transition from the
VT 116/Hinesburg Road corridor to the larger scale medical and office buildings farther back on
Tilley Drive.
14.07 Specific Review Standards
In all Zoning Districts and the City Center Form Based Codes District, the following standards shall apply:
A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision
of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an
arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve
general access and circulation in the area.
The proposed driveway is located on the adjacent lot to the east, but the driveway does not appear to
support shared access on the adjacent lot without creating significant Class III wetland impacts.
However, should the wetland impacts be deemed acceptable by the US Army Corps of Engineers, Staff
considers the proposed configuration supports shared access.
The property to the north is currently in residential use, but is located within the Industrial Open Space
zoning district. The 0.9 acre parcel could potentially be developed with a commercial use, at which time
the Board may require access to the property via either Tilley Drive or Old Farm Road. Staff considers
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
11
11 of 15
the triangular portion of the subject parcel may later be considered the location for access to the
property to the north. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to provide an access
easement to the benefit of Lot 7 and the property to the north as part of this PUD. Staff refers the
Board to the enclosed highlighted subdivision plat to show the configuration of the three properties.
B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire‐served utility lines and service connections
shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities regulations. Any utility
installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to
neighboring properties and to the site. Standards of Section 15.13, Utility Services, shall also be met.
10. The location of wire served utilities is not shown on the plan. Staff recommends the Board require the
applicant to update the plan to show the location of all wire served utilities and that they be underground.
C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including
compliance with any recycling, composting, or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and
properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s).
Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (ie, non‐dumpster, non‐large drum) shall
not be required to be fenced or screened.
The applicant is proposing an enclosed dumpster at the northeast corner of the parking lot. Staff considers
this criterion met.
D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. See Article 13, Section 13.06 Landscaping, Screening,
and Street Trees.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening
shall be required for all uses subject to planned unit development review.
13.06G Landscaping Standards.
(1) The Development Review Board shall require compliance with any Tree Ordinance or
Landscaping Design Standards enacted by the City of South Burlington, subsequent to the effective
date of these regulations.
(2) Overall, there shall be a mix of large canopy tree species within each landscaping plan.
(3) Landscaping Budget Requirements. The Development Review Board shall require minimum
planting costs for all site plans, as shown in Table 13‐9 below. In evaluating landscaping
requirements, some credit may be granted for existing trees or for site improvements other than
tree planting as long as the objectives of this section are not reduced.
The minimum landscape requirement for this project is determined by Table 13‐9 of the South Burlington
Land Development Regulations.
The applicant estimates the building cost to be $461,760. The required minimum landscape value is
therefore $11,735.20, as follows.
Total Building Construction
Cost
% of total Construction Cost Required Value
$0 ‐ $250,000 3% $7,500
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
12
12 of 15
Next $250,000 2% $4,235.20
Additional Over $500,000 1% $0
Total $11,735.20
The applicant is proposing $14,150 in trees and shrubs. However, it appears at least eight of the proposed
trees are proposed to be located outside of the property line, including two in the public right of way and
six on the adjoining property to the North which is not part of the PUD.
11. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to update their proposed landscaping value to only
reflect the value of trees and shrubs on the applicant’s property. Staff estimates the revised proposed
value of trees and shrubs will be below the required minimum.
The applicant has requested that the value of ornamental grasses, stone pavers, and wooden screening
fence to be applied to the required minimum landscape value. The Board may only allow things other
than trees and shrubs to be applied towards the minimum landscape value if the landscaping objectives
are not otherwise reduced. Staff recommends the Board defer decision on whether to allow some value
for landscaping other than trees and shrubs to be applied until other deficiencies in the landscaping plan
are met. A discussion of landscaping objectives follows.
13.06B Landscaping of Parking Areas
(1) All off‐street parking areas shall be landscaped around the perimeter of the lot with trees,
shrubs and other plants. Perimeter planting shall be set back from the curb sufficiently to allow
for snow storage. The purpose of perimeter planting shall be to mitigate the view of the parking
lot from the public way and from adjacent uses and properties, and to provide shade and canopy
for the parking lot. In some situations it may be necessary both for surveillance purposes and
for the perception of safety to install the size and type of plants that leave visual access between
the parking lot to the public way or other pedestrian areas.
12. The applicant has not proposed trees or shrubs between the parking area and Tilley Drive.
There is a stormwater treatment area located in this space. Staff recommends the Board discuss
whether to require tree plantings within the right of way to meet this standard.
a. In all parking areas containing twenty‐eight (28) or more contiguous parking spaces and/or in
parking lots with more than a single circulation lane, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior
of the parking lot shall be landscaped islands planted with trees, shrubs and other plants. Such
requirement shall not apply to structured parking or below‐ground parking.
The applicant has provided a figure, SK‐1, demonstrating that the required interior green space is
provided.
13. Staff notes that trees or shrubs are not provided within all of the interior parking islands; the
one to the southeast is not planted. Staff recommends the Board require planting in this
island.
a. All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing unless specifically designed as
a collection and treatment area for management of stormwater runoff as per 13.06(B)(5)(c)
below. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side,
and shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) square feet. Large islands are
encouraged.
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
13
13 of 15
Interior parking islands are curbed and meet the dimensional standards. Staff considers this
criterion met.
(4) Landscaping Requirements
(a) Landscaping shall include a variety of trees, shrubs, grasses and ground covers. All
planting shall be species hardy for the region and, if located in areas receiving road runoff or
salt spray, shall be salt‐tolerant.
The City Arborist reviewed the plans on November 7, 2019 and expressed no concern about the
plant selection.
14. He did note that the plan calls for 48 PVS which are not called out on the planting schedule.
Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to update the planting schedule to include these
plantings.
(b) At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree shall be provided within or near the
perimeter of each parking area, for every five (5) parking spaces. The trees shall be placed evenly
throughout the parking lot to provide shade and reduce glare. Trees shall be placed a minimum
of thirty (30) feet apart.
There are thirty parking spaces proposed. Staff considers there are five trees which could be
considered as meeting this criterion, while six are required.
15. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to remedy the interior planting island
comment above and this criterion with one additional tree in the southeast interior parking island.
(c) Trees shall have a caliper equal to or greater than two and one‐half (2 ½) inches when
measured on the tree stem, six (6) inches above the root ball.
The proposed trees meet this criterion.
(d) Where more than ten (10) trees are installed, a mix of species is encouraged; the species
should be grouped or located in a manner that reinforces the design and layout of the parking
lot and the site.
A mix of species is proposed. Staff considers this criterion met.
E. Modification of Standards. Except within the City Center Form Based Code District, where the
limitations of a site may cause unusual hardship in complying with any of the standards above and
waiver therefrom will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare, the Development Review Board
may modify such standards as long as the general objectives of Article 14 and the City's Comprehensive
Plan are met. However, in no case shall the DRB permit the location of a new structure less than five (5)
feet from any property boundary and in no case shall be the DRB allow land development creating a
total site coverage exceeding the allowable limit for the applicable zoning district in the case of new
development, or increasing the coverage on sites where the pre‐existing condition exceeds the
applicable limit.
The applicant is requesting setback waivers, discussed above.
F Low Impact Development. The use of low impact site design strategies that minimize site
disturbance, and that integrate structures, landscaping, natural hydrologic functions, and various other
techniques to minimize runoff from impervious surfaces and to infiltrate precipitation into underlying
soils and groundwater as close as is reasonable practicable to where it hits the ground, is required
pursuant to the standards contained within Article 12.
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
14
14 of 15
See discussion under PUD Standard 11 above.
G. Standards for Roadways, Parking and Circulation. Standards of Section 15.12 Standards for
Roadways, Parking, and Circulation shall be met.
The applicant has proposed a 30‐foot wide driveway for the Project. The maximum allowable commercial
driveway is 36‐feet, intended to allow for significant truck traffic. Pavement width for private roadways
is required to be 20‐feet.
16. Staff recommends the Board request the applicant narrow the driveway to a maximum of 24 feet.
OTHER
Signs
17. Staff notes the applicant must remove all signs from the plans. The Board may not approve signs or
sign locations as part of the current application, and Staff recommends the Board include a condition to
this effect.
13.06D. Front Yards of Non‐Residential and Multi‐Family Uses.
In the case of non‐residential and multi‐family uses, the required front yard and/or the frontage along
designated arterial and collector streets (see Article 3, Section 3.06 for this list) shall be suitably
landscaped and maintained in good appearance. Landscape elements that reduce stormwater runoff
and promote stormwater infiltration are encouraged. The Development Review Board shall require the
applicant to meet the provisions of sections 13.06(F) and (G).
18. Hinesburg Road is considered an arterial or collector street. The applicant is proposing to retain three
existing trees, but not supplement the existing plantings. Staff recommends the applicant require
additional landscaping in the front yard.
Energy Standards
Staff notes that all new buildings are subject to the Stretch Energy Code pursuant to Section 3.15:
Residential and Commercial Building Energy Standards of the LDRs.
Bicycle Parking
The applicant has provided two post and ring type bicycle racks, which meets the minimum requirement
of four bicycle spaces for a 2,500 sq. ft. building. Staff notes the bicycle racks must be configured to meet
the minimum spacing requirements of 13.14B(2)(d).
19. For new buildings, the applicant must provide 50% of required short term bike parking spaces as long‐
term bike storage, or two spaces, and one clothes locker. Staff recommends the Board require the
applicant to demonstrate how they will comply with long‐term bike storage and locker requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board discuss the Project with the applicant and close the meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
#SD‐19‐32
Staff Comments
15
15 of 15
Marla Keene, Development Review Planner
TBM - TOP OF BRONZE DISKCAST IN 4" x 4" CONCRETE BOUNDELEV. = 388.64 (NAVD88)MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICE PARK - LOT 847 TILLEY DRIVE SITE DEVELOPMENTSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTDONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING, ENGINEERS, INC.136 Pearl Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452LOCATION MAP1" =1000'VICINITY MAP1" = 100'OCTOBER 9, 2019LEGENDETGDSWCOMBINATION POLEPOWER POLEHYDRANTTELEPHONE POLEGATE VALVELIGHTSUPPORT POLESEWER CLEANOUTCONIFEROUS TREENATURAL GAS VALVETREE LINENATURAL GAS METERSHRUBSIGNHEDGEMAIL BOXFLAG POLECONCRETE MONUMENTIRON PIPE FOUNDSURVEY STATIONSEWER MANHOLEDRAINAGE MANHOLETELEPHONE MANHOLEELECTRICAL MANHOLECURB STOPCONTOUR LINE - EXISTINGPROPERTY LINEWATER LINESANITARY SEWER LINESTORM SEWER LINENATURAL GAS LINEUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUNDERGROUND ELECTRICALCONTOUR LINE - PROPOSEDEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINEEROSION CONTROL FENCESAWCUT PAVEMENTDECIDUOUS TREESHEET INDEX1 SITE PLAN2 GRADING PLAN3 EROSION PREVENTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN4 LIGHTING PLAN5 SITE DETAILS6 SITE & EPSC DETAILS7 WATER & SEWER & LIGHTING DETAILS8 GRAVEL WETLAND DETAILS9 SOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN10-13 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS14 STORMWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PLANLIMIT OF DISTURBANCE FENCEFHAFLOOD HAZARD AREAWETLAND LIMITWETLAND BUFFER LIMITNEW SPOT GRADE344.50CATCH BASINSNOW STORAGE AREAWOOD BARRIER FENCEPROPOSEDDEVELOPMENTREVISED: OCTOBER 30, 2019VT ROU
T
E
1
1
6 TILLEY DRIVEINTERSTATE 89NORTHBOUNDSOUTHBOUNDOLD FARM ROADDONALD D. & BARBARA F. NEFFN/FALLEN ROADLAND COMPANY, INC.N/FUVM MEDICAL CENTERLOT A / 62 TILLEY DRIVE4.52 AC.N/FPIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLCLOT 6 / 119 TILLEY DRIVE13.53 AC.N/F
LEVEL 2112' -0"LEVEL 1100' -0"12" CONCRETE STEM WALL12" NOM. SKIRT BOARD8" NOM. CORNER TRIM6" NOM. FASCIAVISION GLAZINGSTANDING SEAM METAL ROOFTIMBER POST @ ENTRY CANOPYCUPOLA WITH GLAZINGSERVICE ENTRY CANOPY BEYONDLEVEL 2112' -0"LEVEL 1100' -0"12" CONCRETE STEM WALL12" NOM. SKIRT BOARD8" NOM. CORNER TRIM8" NOM. FASCIABARN STYLE DOORSSTANDING SEAM METAL ROOFTIMBER POST @ ENTRY CANOPYCUPOLA WITH GLAZING2ZQHUVKLSRI,QVWUXPHQWVRI6HUYLFH$OOUHSRUWVGUDZLQJVVSHFLILFDWLRQVFRPSXWHUILOHVILHOGGDWDQRWHVDQGRWKHUGRFXPHQWVDQGLQVWUXPHQWVSUHSDUHGE\WKH&RQVXOWDQWDVLQVWUXPHQWVRIVHUYLFHVKDOOUHPDLQWKHSURSHUW\RIWKH&RQVXOWDQW7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOUHWDLQDOOFRPPRQODZ VWDWXWRU\DQGRWKHUUHVHUYHGULJKWVLQFOXGLQJWKHFRS\ULJKWWKHUHWR $0 & ?8VHUV?MODPRWKH?'RFXPHQWV? B5B$5&+B6'BMODPRWKHUYW $07,//(<'5,9(/27_3ULQWHG 6.(7&+3/$13(563(&7,9(6$1'(/(9$7,2166RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ97SD 1.02PERSPECTIVE VIEW AT SOUTH EAST ENTRYSD 1.01PERSPECTIVE VIEW AT SOUTH WEST CORNER -FROM INTERSECTIONSD 1.01 1/2" = 1'-0"3AERIAL VIEWSD 1.01/8" = 1'-0"4ELEVATION -EASTSD 1.01/8" = 1'-0"5ELEVATION -SOUTH
SSSSSSSPROPOSED BUILDING2,496 SFNEW FF ELEV = 389.501124523241910928151416151614141434353534341213331212373736373736373737377747191914149'18'181818282828202115151733111212313131313031303031313838382539353534266PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLCLOT 8 / 47 TILLEY DRIVE1.01 AC.PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLCLOT 6 / 119 TILLEY DRIVE13.53 AC.N/FUVM MEDICAL CENTERLOT A / 62 TILLEY DRIVE4.52 AC.N/FDONALD D. & BARBARA F. NEFFN/F363729323636364036363637424141NEW SMH 8-1NEW SS1EX SMHNEW 6" INV.383.50POND OUTLET 1EX CBNEW SD1NEW SD2POND OUTLET 2CLASS III WETLANDS43194319444545464635' SIDE SETBACK35' SIDE SETBACK25' FRONTSETBACK25' FRONTSETBACK30376472763782222222222SNOW STORAGE AREASNOW STORAGE AREA306" INV. = 386.006" INV. = 386.5048CONSTRUCTION NOTESSAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT.REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING PAVEMENT ANDSUBBASE AS NEEDED.MATCH EXISTING CURB REVEALNEW 8" x 6" WET TAP, SEE DETAILNEW 6" DUCTILE IRON WATERLINE, CLASS 52, DOUBLECEMENT LINED. ALL NEW D.I. WATERLINE AND FITTINGSSHALL BE WRAPPED IN V-BIO ENHANCED POLYETHYLENEPIPE ENCASEMENT.NEW BUILDING PERIMETER DRAIN, SEE DETAILNEW 6" SDR35 PVC SOLID PIPE.NEW 6" MINUS STONE SPLASH PAD, 3' x 3' MIN., 12" DEPTH.NEW CEMENT CONCRETE PAD FOR DUMPSTER.NEW GRAVEL WETLAND, SEE DETAIL.CONNECT TO EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE WITH NEW COREAND BOOT TO FORM A WATERTIGHT CONNECTION.CONSTRUCT NEW INVERT CHANNEL INSIDE STRUCTURE.REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CEMENT CONCRETECURB, MATCH EXISTING CURB REVEAL.REMOVE EXISTING CEMENT CONCRETE CURB.NEW CEMENT CONCRETE CURB, SEE DETAIL.NEW CEMENT CONCRETE MOUNTABLE CURB, SEE DETAIL.CURB TRANSITION ZONE, SEE DETAIL.NEW STONE DIAPHRAGM, SEE DETAIL.NEW BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT.NEW CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK.NEW TRANSFORMER AND BASE. SEE MEP DRAWINGS FORDETAILS, CONDUIT SIZES, AND ROUTES.NEW CONDENSER AND BASE. SEE MEP DRAWINGS FORDETAILS.NEW POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE, TYPICAL. SEELIGHTING PLAN FOR FIXTURE INFORMATION.NEW PATIO AREA, SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN.NEW 8' WIDE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT BIKEPATH.NEW SCREENED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WITH SLIDINGGATE.NEW SEWER CLEANOUT, SEE DETAIL.NEW CONCRETE PAD WITH 2 POST & RING TYPE BIKERACKS.NEW STRIPING, TYPICAL.NEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, TYPICAL ALLACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES.TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MULCH, TYPICAL.TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MATTING, TYPICAL.NEW WOOD BARRIER FENCE, SEE DETAIL.CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN WITH NEW COREAND BOOT TO FORM A WATERTIGHT CONNECTION.FULL CURB REVEAL.DEPRESSED CURB.EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED.EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN.NEW REINFORCED TURF, SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN.CURB END TAPER, SEE DETAIL.REMOVE EXISTING FOUNDATION AND SLAB.REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL.NEW EDGE OF GRAVEL.NEW DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES.GRIND EXISTING PAVEMENT 1-1/2" DEEP PRIOR TOPLACEMENT OF FINAL WEARING COURSE PAVEMENT.PERFORM TEXT EXCAVATION TO CONFIRM ELEVATION OFEXISTING WATERLINE. CONTACT ENGINEER IF A CONFLICTWILL OCCUR WITH NEW UTILITY INSTALLATION.INSTALL INSULATION BETWEEN WATER ANDSEWER/STORM PIPES.NEW WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE, TYPICAL. SEELIGHTING PLAN FOR FIXTURE INFORMATION.NEW DECORATIVE CEDAR SCALLOPED FENCE, 8 FT TALL.123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748NOTE:SPOT GRADES IN PARKING AREA ARE FINISH GRADE OFPAVEMENT. CURB REVEAL, EXCEPT AT DEPRESSED CURBLOCATIONS, SHALL BE 7".NEW STORMSTRUCTURE TABLESTRUCTURE NAMEEX CBPOND OUTLET 1POND OUTLET 2STRUCTURE DETAILSRIM = 385.72INV IN = 381.70 (NEW SD2)INV OUT = 379.40 (EX)RIM = 387.00INV OUT = 383.29 (NEW SD1)RIM = 388.00INV IN = 383.10 (NEW SD1)INV IN = 385.12 (POND DRAIN)INV OUT = 383.00 (NEW SD2)NEW STORMPIPE TABLEPIPEDESC.NEW SD1NEW SD2SIZE(INCH)1515PIPEMATERIALHDPEHDPELENGTH(FT)5.343.0SLOPE(FT/FT)0.03570.0303NEW SEWER SERVICESTRUCTURE TABLESTRUCTURE NAMEEX SMHNEW SMH 8-1STRUCTURE DETAILSRIM = 383.35INV IN = 375.10 (NEW SS2)INV IN = 375.10 (SOUTH)INV OUT = 374.95 (EAST)RIM = 385.88INV IN = 378.35 (NEW SS1)INV OUT = 378.25 (NEW SS2)NEW SEWER SERVICEPIPE TABLEPIPEDESC.NEW SS1NEW SS2SIZE(INCH)66PIPEMATERIALSDR35 PVCSDR35 PVCLENGTH(FT)239.9128.5SLOPE(FT/FT)0.02150.0245DLHCEJPKJPK10/09/20191" = 20'19-0911MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICE PARK - LOT 847 TILLEY DRIVE SITE DEVELOPMENTSITE PLANPIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC462 SHELBURNE ROAD, SUITE 101BURLINGTON, VT 0540110/23/2019 REVISED NOTES 4 & 5 PER SBWD COMMENTS JPKNOTES:1. CONTOURS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL LIDAR DATA PROVIDED BY THE STATE OFVERMONT OPEN GEODATA PORTAL AND FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.2. PROPERTY LINES DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED SUBDIVISION PLAT, MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICEPARK, TILLEY 3 SUBDIVISION, TILLEY DRIVE AND OLD FARM ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, DATED 07/07/08 ANDLAST REVISED 09/10/08, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.3. EXISTING FEATURES DEPICTED ON MVBP LOT A ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED MOUNTAIN VIEW BUSINESS PARK, SITEPLAN, DATED 03/06/02 AND LAST REVISED 08/03/05, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.4. WETLAND LIMITS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN WERE DELINEATED BY GILMAN & BRIGGS ENVIRONMENTAL ON 10/03/2019 ANDVERIFIED BY THE STATE OF VERMONT WETLANDS PROGRAM ON 10/22/2019.5. EXISTING FEATURES DEPICTED ON MVBP LOT B ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED MOUNTAIN VIEW BUSINESS PARK LOT BSITE DEVELOPMENT, SITE PLAN, DATED 01/19/04 AND LAST REVISED 04/12/06, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLINCONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.6. TILLEY DRIVE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED "TILLEY II SUBDIVISION,ROADWAY PLAN VIEW", SHEET #2, DATED 05/26/04 AND LAST REVISED 04/04/05, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLINCONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.7. PROPOSED LANE CONFIGURATIONS ALONG VT ROUTE 116 SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED"HINESBURG ROAD TURN LANES, SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS" SHEET #7, DATED 03/30/2012 AND LAST REVISED02/11/2019, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.10/24/2019ADD ALLOWABLE COVERAGE COLUMNREVISED CLASS III WETLAND/BUFFER LIMITS, REVISED NOTE #4 JPKPROJECT INFORMATION - MVOP LOT 8EXISTING NEWALLOWABLEAREA(SF/AC)% OFTOTALAREA(SF/AC)% OFTOTALLOT SIZE43,834 1.01 100.00 43,834 1.01 100.00BUILDING COVERAGE2,985 0.07 6.93 2,496 0.06 5.9430PARKING & DRIVE COVERAGE9,065 0.21 20.79 12,974 0.30 29.70SIDEWALK/PATH COVERAGE2,291 0.05 4.95MISC. COVERAGE902 0.02 1.98TOTAL COVERAGE12,0500.2827.7218,6630.43 42.57 50FRONT YARD SETBACKBASED ON 25' SETBACK, HINESBURG RD & TILLEY DR FRONT YARD SETBACK SIZE10,0790.23 100.00 FRONT YARD COVERAGE1648 0.04 17.3930ZONING DISTRICT: INDUSTRIAL & OPEN SPACEPARKING STATISTICSREQUIRED: 13 CONVENIENCE STORE: 2,496 SF GFA x 5 SPACES PER 1000 SF GFAPROVIDED: 3010/30/2019SHOW FENCE ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE,NOTE 25 FOR DUMPSTER PAD, SHOW DUMPSTER FENCE JPK
SSSSSSS388.27388.27388.00388.27388.46389.46389.19389.26389.50389.50389.50389.24389.31389.51388.84388.57388.57388.50388.65388.57388.35388.00388.30386.60386.60387.45388.36386.36386.23385.88384.11384.79385.26385.96386.00385.65385.15386.74387.03385.42384.95389.58389.48388.37388.27388.37388.48388.48389.39389.39389.50389.50388.37389.14389.04389.71389.80390.04390.14389.50389.50389.40384.85385.00385.97385.80387.30387.15388.50388.35387.88387.98390.65390.39TOP CONC. PAD390.25TOP CONC. PAD389.50389.15389.38389.40388.50389.50389.50PROPOSED BUILDING2,496 SFNEW FF ELEV = 389.50388.50389.31389.31388.42388.35388.42388.82388.88388.82388.42388.35388.42388.82388.88388.82EX CBDLHCEJPKJPK10/09/20191" = 20'19-0912MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICE PARK - LOT 847 TILLEY DRIVE SITE DEVELOPMENTGRADING PLANPIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC462 SHELBURNE ROAD, SUITE 101BURLINGTON, VT 0540110/24/2019 REVISED CLASS III WETLAND/BUFFER LIMITS, REVISED NOTE #4 JPKNOTE:SPOT GRADES IN PARKING AREA ARE FINISH GRADE OFPAVEMENT. CURB REVEAL, EXCEPT AT DEPRESSED CURBLOCATIONS, SHALL BE 7".NOTES:1. CONTOURS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL LIDAR DATA PROVIDED BY THE STATE OFVERMONT OPEN GEODATA PORTAL AND FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.2. PROPERTY LINES DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED SUBDIVISION PLAT, MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICEPARK, TILLEY 3 SUBDIVISION, TILLEY DRIVE AND OLD FARM ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, DATED 07/07/08 ANDLAST REVISED 09/10/08, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.3. EXISTING FEATURES DEPICTED ON MVBP LOT A ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED MOUNTAIN VIEW BUSINESS PARK, SITEPLAN, DATED 03/06/02 AND LAST REVISED 08/03/05, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.4. WETLAND LIMITS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN WERE DELINEATED BY GILMAN & BRIGGS ENVIRONMENTAL ON 10/03/2019 ANDVERIFIED BY THE STATE OF VERMONT WETLANDS PROGRAM ON 10/22/2019.5. EXISTING FEATURES DEPICTED ON MVBP LOT B ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED MOUNTAIN VIEW BUSINESS PARK LOT BSITE DEVELOPMENT, SITE PLAN, DATED 01/19/04 AND LAST REVISED 04/12/06, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLINCONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.6. TILLEY DRIVE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED "TILLEY II SUBDIVISION,ROADWAY PLAN VIEW", SHEET #2, DATED 05/26/04 AND LAST REVISED 04/04/05, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLINCONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.7. PROPOSED LANE CONFIGURATIONS ALONG VT ROUTE 116 SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED"HINESBURG ROAD TURN LANES, SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS" SHEET #7, DATED 03/30/2012 AND LAST REVISED02/11/2019, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.10/30/2019SHOW FENCE ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE,SHOW DUMPSTER FENCE JPK
SSSSSSSA4 / TYPE 1WPA4 / TYPE 2A4 / TYPE 1A4 / TYPE 1A0 / TYPE 1EX CB#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.02#0.02#0.03#0.05#0.08#0.10#0.13#0.16#0.17#0.14#0.13#0.08#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.02#0.02#0.02#0.02#0.02#0.02#0.02#0.02#0.03#0.04#0.07#0.11#0.16+0.20+0.24+0.27+0.24#0.21*0.08*0.02*0.01*0.01#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.02#0.03#0.02#0.02#0.02#0.03#0.03#0.03#0.03#0.04#0.03#0.03#0.03#0.04#0.05*0.08*0.14*0.21+0.29+0.35+0.39+0.37*0.32*0.10*0.02*0.02*0.02#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.00#0.01#0.01#0.01#0.02#0.02#0.03#0.05#0.04#0.04#0.04#0.05#0.05#0.06#0.06#0.06#0.06#0.06#0.06#0.06#0.07*0.10*0.16*0.27+0.41+0.51+0.58+0.56*0.48*0.09*0.04*0.03*0.03#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.03*0.05*0.07*0.08*0.07*0.06*0.07*0.09*0.11*0.12*0.12*0.12*0.13*0.12*0.10*0.08*0.09*0.12*0.18*0.31*0.52+0.71+0.84+0.73*0.55*0.13*0.07*0.06*0.04#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.00*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.05*0.11*0.12*0.13*0.11*0.09*0.10*0.11*0.14*0.18*0.22*0.22*0.19*0.15*0.12*0.12*0.13*0.17*0.23*0.34*0.58+0.86+1.11+1.07*0.66*0.18*0.12*0.10*0.04#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.00*0.01*0.01*0.02*0.08*0.19*0.18*0.21*0.18*0.14*0.15*0.16*0.17*0.23*0.37*0.44*0.26*0.19*0.19*0.19*0.20*0.26*0.32*0.42+0.66+0.96+1.35+1.62*0.60*0.30*0.16*0.10*0.04#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.00*0.00*0.01*0.02*0.14#0.31#0.28*0.33*0.30*0.24*0.27*0.26*0.26*0.46*0.60*0.72*0.55*0.36*0.36*0.37*0.36*0.41*0.46*0.49+0.71+0.98+1.18*1.29*0.46*0.33*0.17*0.07*0.03#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.00*0.00*0.00*0.03*0.26#0.57#0.49*0.58*0.49*0.49*0.55*0.65*0.76*0.92*1.45*1.69*1.12*0.83*0.76+0.68+0.64+0.62+0.61+0.47+0.60+0.80+0.80*0.71*0.24*0.19*0.16*0.05*0.03#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.06#0.94#0.69#0.76+0.68+0.67+0.68+0.74+0.88+1.05+1.33+1.42+1.19+1.01+0.87+0.79+0.80+0.79+0.76+0.41+0.50+0.61*0.61*0.28*0.12*0.11*0.11*0.04*0.02#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00+1.11+0.83+0.94+0.85+0.90+0.86+0.83+0.84+0.95+1.02+1.02+1.01+0.92+0.89+0.94+1.00+0.96+0.88+0.48*0.44*0.46*0.43*0.14*0.07*0.07*0.07*0.03*0.02#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.14*1.06*0.89*1.24+1.15+1.16+0.98+0.81+0.73*0.75+0.72+0.71+0.75*0.78+0.82+0.99+1.19*1.26*1.19*0.57*0.43*0.39*0.27*0.08*0.04*0.04*0.05*0.02*0.01#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.16*0.79*0.82*1.65+1.59+1.29+0.96+0.73+0.60*0.54+0.48+0.46+0.50*0.59+0.72+0.91+1.19+1.56*1.67*0.64*0.46*0.31*0.14*0.06*0.03*0.03*0.03*0.02*0.01#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.15*0.54*0.60*1.37+1.42+1.23+0.93+0.69+0.52*0.40+0.31+0.30+0.35*0.46+0.63+0.87+1.15+1.39*1.36*0.51*0.33*0.24*0.10*0.05*0.03*0.03*0.02*0.02*0.01#0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.14*0.35*0.41*0.84+1.01+1.01+0.84+0.69+0.52*0.39+0.31+0.29+0.34+0.47+0.65+0.83+0.98+1.01*0.84*0.37*0.19*0.17*0.08*0.04*0.03*0.02*0.02*0.01*0.01#0.02*0.05*0.12*0.22*0.39*0.62*1.01+1.10+0.75+0.56+0.45+0.41+0.62+0.76+0.79+0.71+0.65+0.62+0.61+0.54+0.55+0.60+0.71+0.78+0.77+0.79+0.79+0.66*0.18*0.12*0.10*0.07*0.04*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.01*0.01#0.02*0.06*0.13*0.22#0.33*0.60*0.84*0.84*0.71*0.46*0.33*0.30*0.45+0.60+0.62+0.62+0.66+0.79+1.04+1.10+1.11+1.17+1.20+1.02+0.78+0.70+0.60+0.49*0.16*0.08*0.06*0.05*0.03*0.02*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01#0.03*0.07*0.11*0.16#0.24*0.40*0.44*0.45*0.45*0.33*0.22*0.19*0.28*0.43*0.44*0.54+0.70+0.98+1.41+1.78+1.75+1.82+1.56+1.27+0.84+0.62*0.42*0.33*0.11*0.05*0.04*0.03*0.03*0.02*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01#0.03*0.04*0.07*0.10#0.15*0.19*0.17*0.17*0.17*0.17*0.12*0.11*0.15*0.26*0.28*0.35+0.52+0.83+1.35+1.51+1.48+1.41+1.25+0.83+0.53+0.37*0.24*0.20*0.06*0.03*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.00#0.01*0.02*0.03*0.03#0.04*0.04*0.03*0.03*0.04*0.04*0.04*0.04*0.07*0.14*0.14*0.15*0.24*0.41*0.64*0.85*0.97*0.79*0.44*0.36*0.24*0.13*0.10*0.10*0.03*0.02*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.00#0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.03*0.06*0.06*0.06*0.06*0.06*0.05*0.05*0.05*0.05*0.05*0.06*0.06*0.05*0.05*0.05*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.03*0.03*0.03*0.03*0.03*0.04*0.03*0.03*0.04*0.04*0.04*0.03*0.03*0.03*0.02*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.00*0.00*0.00#0.00*0.00*0.00*0.00*0.00*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.00*0.01*0.01*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.02*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.00*0.00*0.01*0.01*0.01*0.00*0.00*0.00*0.00WPDLHCEJPKJPK10/09/20191" = 20'19-0914MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICE PARK - LOT 847 TILLEY DRIVE SITE DEVELOPMENTLIGHTING PLANPIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC462 SHELBURNE ROAD, SUITE 101BURLINGTON, VT 0540110/24/2019 REVISED CLASS III WETLAND/BUFFER LIMITS JPKLIGHTING STATISTICSPARKING & WALKWAYSMAXIMUM = 1.82 fcMINIMUM = 0.20 fcAVERAGE = 0.83 fcUNIFORMITY RATIO = 4.2 : 1QTYA0 / TYPE 1NEW POLE MOUNTED LIGHT - LITHONIA LIGHTING DXS0 LED P1 40K BLCMOUNTING HEIGHT = 20'. NEW 20' TALL POLE WITH TYPE 1 POLE BASE.1A4 / TYPE 1NEW POLE MOUNTED LIGHT - LITHONIA LIGHTING DXS0 LED P1 40K T4MMOUNTING HEIGHT = 20'. NEW 20' TALL POLE WITH TYPE 1 POLE BASE.3A4 / TYPE 2NEW POLE MOUNTED LIGHT - LITHONIA LIGHTING DXS0 LED P1 40K T4MMOUNTING HEIGHT = 20'. NEW 18' TALL POLE WITH TYPE 2 POLE BASE.1WPNEW BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT - LITHONIA LIGHTING DSXW1 LED 10C530 40K T3M HSMOUNTING HEIGHT = 15'.2
14 CA1 GT1 GT1 AF1 AF3 ASPROPOSED DECORATIVE8FT TALL SCALLOPED FENCEEXISTING TREESTO REMAINEXISTING TREESTO REMAINEXISTING TREESTO REMAINEXISTING TREESTO REMAINEXISTING TREESTO REMAIN1 AS1 PG31 PP1 PG31 AF1 PP1 AS1 PG31 PG32 AG2 AF1 AF1 PG22 AG1 PG232 CA28 CA6 CA48 PVS7 TO9 TM6 TMD
TILLEY DRIVED DDT
T T T T T T T25'FRONTSETBACK25'FRONTSETBACK35'SIDESETBACK35'SIDESETBACKSTORMWATER TREATMENT AREAPROPOSEDBUILDINGDECIDUOUS TREESQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEAS 5 Acer saccharum `Green Mountain` Green Mountain Sugar Maple 2 1/2 - 3" CAL.AF 6 Acer x freemanii `Sienna` Sienna Glen Maple 2 1/2 - 3" CAL./ B&BAG 4 Amelanchier x grandiflora `Autumn Brilliance` `Autumn Brilliance` Serviceberry 6 - 8` HT./Multi-StemGT 2 Gleditsia triacanthos `Shademaster` Shademaster Honeylocust 2 1/2 - 3" CAL.EVERGREEN TREESQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEPG3 4 Picea glauca White Spruce 6 - 8` HT./ B&BPG2 2 Picea glauca White Spruce 8 - 10` HT., B&BPP 2 Picea pungens glauca Colorado Blue Spruce 6 - 8` HT./ B&BTO 7 Thuja occidentalis `Nigra` Dark American Arborvitae 5 - 6` HT.SHRUBSQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPACINGTM 15 Taxus media `Hicksii` Hicks Yew 2 1/2 - 3` HT. 48" o.c.GRASSESQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPACINGCA 80 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass 2 GAL. 30" o.c.S8ii`Shdh`ShdhSihG2G 36PLANT SCHEDULEofProject NumberSheetDrawing NumberDrawing TitleIssued forChecked byDesigned byAppvd.DateRevisionNo.vhb.comDate40 IDX Drive, Building 100Suite 200South Burlington, VT 05403Tilley Drive Lot 8South Burlington, VermontSeptember 23, 2019000000PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLCDeveloper462 Shelburne Road, Suite 101Burlington, Vermont 05401MKW0 15 30 60 FeetPlanting Plan
SSSSSSSEX CBTOTAL PARKING AREA = 14,076 SFPARKING ISLANDS AREA = 1,522 SF% PARKING ISLANDS = 10.8%DLHCEJPKJPK10/07/20191" = 20'19-091SK-1MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICE PARK - LOT 847 TILLEY DRIVE SITE DEVELOPMENTPARKING ISLANDS PLANPIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC462 SHELBURNE ROAD, SUITE 101BURLINGTON, VT 05401NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION