Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1100 Hinesburg Roadr r-4001 WE 5 `lam southburlinaon PLANNING & ZONING Abby Lisius Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Expiration of Final Plat Approval #SD-08-37, 1110 Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Lisius: Please be advised that final plat approval #SD-08-37 issued on 8/19/08 to revise the location of a shared water line easement at 1100 Hinesburg Road has become null and void. This approval has expired due to the failure to record the final plat plan (mylar) in the land records within 180 days of the decision as required by condition #6 of said approval. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincere G� Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 1100 Hinesburg Road (East T'ntain View) Page 1 of 2 Abby Lisius, P.E. From: Abby Lisius, P.E. Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 8:33 AM To: 'ray' Cc: Jeremy Matosky, P.E.; Rand Larson Subject: RE: 1100 Hinesburg Road (East Mountain View) Attached are a copy of the original approved plat, dated 5/4/2007 and the proposed plat, dated 5-28-08. I've highlighted the change to the water line easement on each plan. The original intent of the easement was to follow the water main extension so the City, as well as the neighboring property, would have access to the water main extension and hydrant. As you can see, it's a relatively minor adjustment that had to be made due to the constructed water main lying outside the original easement. Language on the new plat will indicate the easement to be centered on the water main. I understand, based on our previous conversation, that this will require a plat amendment application, but is this change something that can be approved administratively, without a hearing? Thanks, Abby From: ray [mailto:rbelair@sburl.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:34 PM To: Abby Lisius, P.E. Subject: RE: 1100 Hinesburg Road (East Mountain View) Hi Abby, Since easements are required to be shown on a subdivision plat, and you are proposing to amend a required element, you will need to amend the plat to revise the easement location. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 802-846-4106 From: Abby Lisius, P.E. [mailto:Abby.Lisius@trudellconsulting.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:16 AM To: ray Subject: 1100 Hinesburg Road (East Mountain View) Hi Ray - We had to adjust the water line easement on the Plat for East Mountain View due to the water main being installed in a slightly different location. Does this minor plat change need to go through you or do we just record the new plat at the Town Clerk's office? Thanks, Abigail A. Lioiuo, P.E. Project Manager/ Engineer 6/4/2008 N/F A. & L. RYE' FOX RUN LANE N/F M. DUBOIS 6 C) Q 0 3 rr ^^ O FVT� � �L O CC et m � W z .; THIS PLAT IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: 1) DEEDS RESEARCHED IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BURUNG70N LAND RECORDS. 2) A CLOSED FIELD TRAVERSE CONDUCTED WITH A TOTAL STATION ON 8/7/06. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON GRID NORTH. 3) REBARS SET ARE NO. 5 REINFORCING BARS WITH ALUMINUM CAPS STAMPED 'TRUDELL CONSUL77NG ENGINEERS, LS 488 4) THIS PARCEL WAS CONVEYED TO EAST MOUNTAIN NEW. LLC IN VOLUME 754 PAGE 53. SEE ALSO PLAT REFERENCElIM 5) DISTANCES ARE SHOWN TO THE HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. BEARINGS ARE SHOWN TO THE SECOND FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. 6) AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO IDENTIFY OR DELINEATE EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, LEASE LANDS, ENCROACHMENTS, ETC. OBSERVED IN THE FIELD OR READILY FOUND IN THE LAND RECORDS. ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES MAY DOST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 7) PLAT RorERENCE /4 SHOWS A PROPOSED EASEMENT ACROSS SUBJECT PARCEL TO ACCESS PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. NO EASEMENT DEEDS WERE FOUND IN THE CITY LAND RECORDS. PUT REFERENCES 1. 'MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK, HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, Vr SUBOIWSION PUT- DATED 4123196 BY THIS OFFICE AND RECORDED IN THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS IN MAP SLIDE 300. 2. 'GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK, HINES13URG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT, PLAT OF SURVEY DATED 6/J/94 BY THIS OFFICE AND RECORDED IN THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS IN MAP SLIDE 27Z 3. "BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, T020 HINESBURG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DATED 5122195 BY THIS OFFICE AND RECORDED IN THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS IN MAP SLIDE 284. 4. 'PLAT OF SURVEY, MALCOLM WILLARD PROPERTY, HINESBURG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DATED 9/22/99 BY WARREN ROSENSTEIN. L.S. AND RECORDED IN THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS IN MAP SLIDE 38J. SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RECEIVED FOR RECORD A.D. 200_ LEGEND 0 REBAR ( SET) ■ C-( 71 MONUMENT ( FDUND ) O REINFORGNG BAR ( FOUND ) STONE MCNUMENT ( FOUND ) Graphic Scale Feet 20 0 20 40 60 BO ICE JOINT VENTURE 387 p. 439 50v-, 01 (ei.Q 'sc 0F4-, yum Boundary Plat .2DB6D90—w L I EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW �� Prolxt elg. X. p,yyp AFC AY OR ® CHANCE wA1EplME G6EMENT 5/2I/OB BGR _* ND..BB *1100 Hinesburg Road ® — EASEMENTS 4 ABUrTEItS 5/ /07 AAL s C <iCLt�fSEO pyre 08/28/D6 S_W 1'-20' A� � � r 0 ADD USEM M a ABU7TErtS I/2/D7 SMT 9•u SURD_\\ a South Burlington, VT ��((�0ro(rouannuninnl�° Iya Book 241 pay XX aeRx7oay w wey BY � TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 Nair Pa* lean P. O. 5- SOB �t Vermont 05495 (802) $796331 APWONe3 1100 Hinesburg Road (East 4 intain View) - Lighting Page 1 of 1 ray From: Abby Lisius, P.E. [Abby@trudellconsulting.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:55 PM To: ray Subject: 1100 Hinesburg Road (East Mountain View) - Lighting Attachments: GWCO-12.pdf; 2006090-51 SP1a.pdf Ray - The applicant would like to mount a security light over the doors on the north and south ends of the building. The fixtures are full cut-off down -cast 50 Watt Metal Halide. I've attached cut sheets for the fixture, as well as a site plan showing the proposed light locations (circled in red). Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Abigail A. Lisius, P.E. Project Manager/ Engineer TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 p (802) 879-6331 f (802) 879-0060 visit us on the web at www.trudellconsultinR.com <<GWCO-12.pdf>> <<2006090-51 SP1a.pdf>> 2/20/2008 1 8.2" (208 mm) 1 PULSE START METAL HALIDE # 125W PSMH MGWC0612-(a)(b) — SPEC HSPEC # 150W PSMH MGWC0615-(a)(b) METAL HALIDE ./ SPEC # 50W MH _ MGWC0405-(a)(b) SPEC. # 70W MH MGWC0407-(a)(b) - 0 SPEC # 10OW MH MGWC0410-(a)(b) _ Q SeEC # MH _175W _._._...._.._._MGWC0417_(a)(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM SPEC # 35W HPS MGWC0503-(a)(b) SPEC # 50W HPS MGWC0505-(a)(b) 0 SPEC # 70W HPS MGWC0507-(a)(b) SPEC # 10OW HPS MGWC0510-(a)(b) 0 SPEC # 150W HPS MGW60515-(a)(b) Specify (a) Voltage & (b) Options. Full Cutoff Wall Pack fixture for HID lamp, totally enclosed. Housing is seamless copper -free die- cast aluminum. Lens assembly consists of a hinged, rigid die-cast copper -free aluminum frame and clear borosilicate glass lens held securely inside. Lens frame is easily removable and allows for easy attachment and serviceability using top pivoting hinge. Complete silicone gasketing around lens and gasketing at mounting provide a watertight seal. A precision specular aluminum reflector provides forward throw with wide distribution to ensure wide fixture spacings and maximum light levels. Fixture design provides excellent IES Full Cutoff light distribution without glare. The optical chamber is sealed to reduce dirt and insect contamination. Furnished with e-coated, copper -free, lightweight mounting box designed for installation over standard 4-inch square or octagonal and single -gang J boxes and for conduit entry from top, sides and rear. Designed and approved for easy through -wiring. All fixtures use vertical -lamp position. D 120/277V (Standard: 125W PSMH; 50 —10OW MH; 50W HPS) M 120/208/240/277V (Standard: 150W PSMH; 175W MH; 70 -150W HIPS) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (Standard: 150W PSMH; 70 — 175W Mid; 70 — 150W HPS) 1 120V (Standard: 35W HIPS) — 2 277V 27 277V Reactor (150W PSMH Only) 3 208V 4 240V 5 480V (175W MH; 70 —150W HPS) 6 347V (Canada Only) For voltage availability outside the US and Canada, see Bulletin TD-9 or contact your Ruud Lighting authorized International Distributor. Fixture includes clear, medium -base lamp. Pulse -rated porcelain enclosed, 4kv-rated screw - shell -type lampholder. Lamp ignitor included where required. Fixtures require a minimum 900C temperature feed wire. All ballast assemblies are high -power factor and use the following circuit types: Reactor (277V PSMH) 150W PSMH Reactor 120V: 35 -150W HPS HX — High Reactance 50 -100W MH; 50 -15OW HPS CWA — Constant Wattage Autotransformer 125 & 150W PSMH; 175W MH ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in the US and Canada for wet locations. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406-3772 USA Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA -(a)F Fusing _(a)P Button Photocell O Quartz Standby (includes 100W quartz lamp) (N/A on 277V Reactor) Specify (a) Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key Exclusive Colorfast DeltaGuardTM finish features an E-coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra -durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven-year limited warranty. 6,867,959 and Patents Pending. ACCESSORIES PC-1 Button Photocell (for fixtures set to 120V) PC-2 Button Photocell (for fixtures set to 208, 240, 277V) PC'6 Button Photocell (for fixtures set to 347V) PHONE (262) 886-1900 FAX (262) 884-3309 vww.ruudhghting.com 08/03/06 RUUD LIGHTING It 12" FULL CUTOFF WALL PACK 50' 1 / Candlepower Distribution Curve of 175W MH 12" AeroDome Full Cutoff Wall Pack. Isotootcanaie plots snow initial tootcanales at grace.(f00tcanciles - U.U929 = Lux) JU45' bl OV 45 30 15 0' 18.3 13.7 9.1 4.6 Om 18.3 13.7 9.1 4.6 0 m 4.6 9.1 13.7 18.3 Isofootcandle plot of one 175W MH 12" AeroDome Full Cutoff Wall Pack at 15' (4.6 m) mounting height (plan view). RUU D 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406-3772 USA LIGHTING © Ruud Lighting, Inc. Printed in USA PHONE (262) 886-1900 FAX (262) 884-3309 www.ruudlighting.com 08/03/06 Received!A - LDw V1WAIN Recorded in VoQ-0,&on pa6d , i of So. &r1ington Land Re. Attest: Donna S.1(inville, City Clerk RECREATION PATH EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC, a Vermont limited liability company with its principle place of business in Williston, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to it paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipal corporation located in Chittenden County, Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of- way for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a recreational pathway for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows: Being a strip of land twenty feet (20') in uniform width, located along the entire westerly boundary of Grantor's property, known and numbered as 1100 Hinesburg Road, which boundary is immediately adjacent to the easterly sideline of Route 116 - Hinesburg Road and designated as "20' Recreational Path Easement" as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington Vermont", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, dated 12/8/2006, last revised 5/4/07, and recorded in Map Slide 501 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said easement and right-of-way shall be used by the public as a recreational and bicycle pathway subject to the condition that no motorized traffic, including, but not limited to, motorcycles, trail bikes and snowmobiles, shall be allowed to use the pathway, except motorized vehicles used by the Grantee, or its agents, for the purpose of maintaining or patrolling the pathway. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said recreational pathway, including all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts and ramps, at its sole cost and expense. Grantee further agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this easement and temporary construction easement shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at its own cost and within a reasonable time. Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that it will indemnify and hold the Grantor harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that is customarily maintained, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of-way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this easement, acknowledges that is has been donated to the City, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. For purposes of construction, a temporary easement and right-of-way ten feet (10') on each side of said permanent easement and right-of-way is hereby granted. Said temporary easement and right-of-way shall expire once construction is completed and the recreational pathway is open to the public. The within Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the right-of-way and easement such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said right-of-way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement and right-of-way which shall prevent or interfere with the within Grantee's ability to use said easement and right-of-way. Grantee acknowledges that the construction and maintenance of improvements necessary to provide access to Grantor's property shall not be inconsistent with the use of this easement by the Grantee. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the within Grantor by Warranty Deed of Malcolm Willard, dated July 5, 2006 and recorded in Volume 754 at Pages 53-54 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deed and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantor does for itself and its successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantor has good right and title to sell and convey the rights as aforesaid and that Grantor, and its successor and assigns shall Warrant and Defend the same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC hereunto sets its hands and seals this /G Y4 day of , 2007. IN PRESENCE OF: STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC IC Its dl.�.y authorized agent and Member At South Burlington, Vermont, this 16n-f day of K-a , 2007, personally appeared Rand Larson, duly authorized agent and Member of East Mountain View, LLC, signer and sealer of the foregoing written instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of East Mountain View, LLC. Before , Notary(Public My Commission Expires 2/10/11 FAEast Mountain View, LLC\Recreation. Path Easement Deed.wpd Vermont Property Transfer Tax 32 V.S.A. Chap 231 --ACKn!0I�JLEGCE��T— RETURN REC'D-TAX PAID BOARD OF HEALTH CERT. REC'D. VTLAND USE & DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACT, CERT. REC'D Return No. 4 ,Clerk Date" CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 25, 2007 Abigail Lisius Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: East Mountain View Dear Ms. Lisius: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Administrative Officer on July 25, 2007 (effective 7/25/07). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. Should you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, Betsy QDOnough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. WARD & BABB ATTORNEYS -AT -LAW EUGENE J. WARD, III ATrade Name for a Professional Corporation CLOSING COORDINATOR: GUY L. BABB DEBRA DENNY JOHN J. BALKUNAS, JR. (VT, NJ) ALLAN W. RUGGLES (VT, NY, CA) LEGAL ASSISTANTS: GREGG M. HARRIS JANA M. MCQUEENEY WILLIAM B. TOWLE (VT, NM) TRACY E. ERICKSON TIMOTHY D. KING (VT, CT) SUSAN A. BIGGINS PARALEGAL: JO RICHER August 2, 2007 Ray Belair Planning and Zoning Dept. City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: East Mountain View, LLC Dear Ray: Enclosed please find the executed Recreation Path Easement and property transfer tax return for recording in the South Burlington Land Records, together with our check in the amount of $32.00 for the required recording fee. Cordial , Timothy D. King, Es . Ki ng_nwkblawyers.com 3069 WILLISTON ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403-6030 C Telephone (802) 863-0307 O Facsimile (802) 863-4587 92 SOUTH MAIN STREET, ST. ALBANS, VERMONT 05478 O Telephone (802) 524-5718 4 Facsimile (802) 524-5718 REPLY TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON OFFICE SHARED ACCESS AGREEMENT 1100 HINESBURG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 East Mountain View, LLC ("EMV") is the owner/developer of property and a project at 1100 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont. EMV received certain approvals for the project by the City of South Burlington Development Review Board dated January 2, 2007 #SD-06-105 and #SD-06-106, which approvals were subject to the condition that EMV provide an access easement to the property owner(s) abutting project property to the south and east for ingress and egress over a portion of the project property as shown on the approved plat upon approval of a development plan on the abutting property by the Development Review Board. CEA Properties, LLC ("CEA") has received Final Plat approval from the City of South Burlington (the "City") to develop said abutting property to the south of EMV's project and has an agreement with the current owner of said abutting property, Munson Earth Moving Corporation, to purchase said property upon receiving all necessary project approvals and permits. Since CEA's development plan has been approved by the City, EMV is required by the City to grant a shared access easement in favor of CEA's project. This Agreement shall be binding on the parties and their successors and assigns. Pursuant to the conditions set forth by the City, EMV and CEA agree as follows: Upon CEA's receipt of necessary approvals and its purchase of the property abutting EMV's property to the south, EMV shall provide to CEA or its successors or assigns (also referred to hereinafter as "grantee") a nonexclusive thirty foot (30') wide by two hundred foot (200') long access easement along the southern boundary of its property beginning at VT 116 for ingress and egress over the access easement as shown on the approved plat and the CEA Properties approved Site Plan dated March 2007 or as amended through the permitting process. 2. At the time of conveyance of the access easement to the grantee, the grantee, its successors and assigns, agree to bear one-half (1/2) of the cost of construction of this two hundred foot (200') long acess road, the fire hydrant, the utility pole relocation, the eight inch (8") water main, the City fees for tap, water hook-up, City use and service fees, and annual operating and maintenance fees, including but not limited to, snow removal, cleaning, salting and road resurfacing, etc. The components of the roadway construction that are included in the cost sharing agreement are shown on the attached plan. The access road repair, maintenance and upkeep cost allocation shall be shared 50/50 between CEA and EMV and their successors and assigns. CEA will receive a copy of all bids, fee proposals, and invoices for all work to be completed under the Shared Cost Agreement. It is agreed that before awarding a contract for any work under the Shared Cost Agreement a minimum of three (3) bids will be solicited from independent contractors to ensure all work is completed for a reasonable fee. This process may be waived if agreed to by both parties. EMV shall submit invoices to CEA for CEA's portion of agreed upon shared costs which CEA shall pay to EMV within 10 days of receipt. 3. CEA agrees that the CEA property as shown on the approved CEA Site Plan or as modified in the future will be developed in such a manner that the traffic generation from the project will not exceed 85 P.M. peak hour trip ends as calculated by the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7`h Edition. 4. If required by the owner/developer, the grantee immediately to the south shall provide a twelve foot (12') by fifteen foot (15') easement for the water main serving the fire hydrant to the owner/developer in a location shown on the approved plan. In turn, if required by the grantee, the owner/developer shall provide a ten foot (10') wide waterline easement to the grantee, its successors and assigns, in a location shown on the owner/developer's approved plan. 5. CEA, in its application process with the City and State, shall request and aggressively promote that, relative to lands to the east of lands of the owner/developer owned by or controlled by Munson Earth Moving Corporation, its successors and/or assigns, the owner/developer shall be obligated to provide the thirty foot (30') wide by two hundred foot (200') long access easement for emergency purposes only, including but not limited to health and fire safety, police protection and ambulance services, and that this access must be restricted by a gate or other suitable means upon extension of the road into lands to the east of N/F Munson Earth Moving Corporation. 6. As originally agreed upon, CEA will not develop or sell a property that is to be developed as a use that competes directly with the permitted uses at 1100 Hinesburg Road. CEA agrees to the conditions (1-6) above provided that EMV (its successors and assigns) or any other owner, business, corporation or partnership operating at the property listed as 1100 Hinesburg Road does not challenge or appeal any permits or approvals needed for the development of the CEA property as shown on the site plan or as modified in the future, provided that the property is developed in accordance with the Shared Access Agreement and the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, and with the condition that the total building floor area within the CEA Planned Unit Development (PUD) remains under 32,000 square feet. Any proposal or amendment that will exceed this limit will remove any restriction limitations on EMV from challenging or appealing future permits or approvals for the CEA Planned Unit Development. In addition, this prohibition shall not apply to EMV or its successors' rights to object to any proposal that runs counter to the provisions of Paragraph 5 above. 8. It is understood that CEA may modify the Planned Unit Development to include the 0.5 acre property located at 1160 Hinesburg Road (presently the Rowley property). Once incorporated into the CEA Planned Unit Development, all conditions restrictions and benefits of this Shared Access Agreement will apply to the modified 3.55 acres PUD. 9. CEA agrees to the condition that trucks with box or trailer lengths in excess of 24 feet are not allowed to enter through the shared access and that it will be posted at the entrance. Any company choosing to ignore this request and signage will be solely responsible for any consequences. 10. It is agreed that once the construction for the EMV project is completed, large/heavy construction equipment will no longer be allowed to enter through the shared access. CEA will obtain a separate construction access during this phase of the construction and during the development of the remaining portion of the CEA Planned Unit Development. Since CEA has agreed to equally share in the cost and maintenance of the shared entry drive, Conditions 9 and 10 shall apply to both CEA and EMV. 11. CEA agrees to establish a view corridor line that extends from the southeast corner of the EMV building corner to a point 100 feet north of the southeast property corner of the CEA property. The portion of the property north and east of the view corridor line will be a restricted building area. With the exception of small low profile structures (pump station, dumpster enclosure, etc.), no other building can be constructed in this area without the approval of East Mountain View, LLC. In Witness Whereof, the parties have set their hands and seal this i day of August, 2007. East Mountain View, LLC By: IX I 7--� Dina Dowhan, its duly authorized Agent and member CEA pert s, C By: IL `- Stephen Vock, its duly authorized Agent and member i t` �cc WN Ll 1 � 1 Q. IX Lu p Cc _ Lu cc V uJ Q rz Q W Wto w � > tF yr Q _._ _ -390- OQ `Q-- —------^ — Cr — UT-s - T SHARED ACCESS Project No. CIVIL Sl IG11 CEERII(G ASSOCIATES, IHC. SCOPE OF WORK LIMITS 06248 P.O. BOX 48, SNELBU:RNE, V7 05482 EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC Sheet aa2 9t s-2:r2; rAX sot 98. - . ? ;vreb: AND CEA PROPERTIES, LLC C �+ �^y VJ�G Scale: t° = 30' Date: 8-1-07 Drawn by: MJW SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT �f Permit Number SP---q-- 4 CITY OF SOUTH BUF LINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 1=124 1'1n�,,�4n:�.. Vim..-i. LLC. 5,�qa LM1i-40y\. -?-d L01SJfQ'I.� 0.5 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 1�0Ok 9V Qo�-'iS1-452 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Say e as cx.,-,?y%,er 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): 3 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1100 4i,nes1n L%CA 7.4bad 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0540— 0 0 00 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) i. 1 . '1 n. . If . ., _ -..-& b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to c) Total building square footage on property (proposed b/u,ildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) d e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain n 0 Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): -'540 ,t GLS ! �VpfDVCA g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: (05, i�5"O Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing ( Z00 % / 1 1 , 5 sq. ft. Proposed 12F 3 ► O % / 11.1. sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing g LiL % l (lg. -7 sq. ft. Proposed S2.797 % / 49. Q sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 3.415 % / 25.3 sq. ft. Proposed 3,415 % ZS 3 sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 1051 35-0_* * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ SG.mt ctS K-€�orove� b) Landscaping: $ 54.vv\,4 As C-00<0ft (A c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): -EAM t as, a.Oflrove A 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): SayytQ 05 gR Ddt j it b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 2 m kI 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 5-Aam-L " C-Wf1) Jed 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: T-a I 1 Z00.7 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) se-e c ac1,.e-A Cis k 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS - please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. see attached sheet 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (1 t" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of nv knowled.v. APPLICANT SIGNAKURE'OV PrROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: < ✓ v 7 I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: It -Complete ❑ Incomplete // , t 4. of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date n v July 10, 2007 So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road To Whom It May Concern: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com On behalf of East Mountain View, LLC, we are submitting a Final Plat application for the 1100 Hinesburg Road Project. The building is currently approved and under construction, but the applicant would like to make a small modification to the rear entrance. Instead of a rectangular entry, a stepped entry is proposed as shown on the enclosed Site Plan. The rear entry plaza has been expanded by two feet in width on either side, pushing the two parking bays out two feet. This change results in a 144 square foot increase in overall lot coverage. I have enclosed the revised Site Plans, Architectural Plans, the Final Plat application, and the amendment fee check in the amount of $160.00. Please note the change to the rear entrance. In a telephone conversation at the end of May, Ray Belair had indicated that this change would likely be able to be made administratively. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, TRU ELL CONS TING ENGINEERS Abigail Lisius, P.E. Project Engineer Encl. Site Plan Application cc. Rand Larson, Steve Connor 06090BelairL,06.doc P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.O.Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com To: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington LETTER OF T MSNMAL Date: 7/13/07 Proj. No.: 2006090 Attention: Ray Re: East Mountain View Copies Date No. Description 1 Site Plan Application 1 Fee Check 1 Revised Site Plans THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval For your information ............ X As requested For review and comment For bids due REMARKS: COPY TO: File 060906elairT04.doc Approved as submitted Approved as noted ....... ... ..._....._.. Returned for corrections Resubmit copies for approval P ........._.. Submit copies for distribution ..... .......... .............. Return corrected prints Printed returned after loan to us SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. List of Abutters East Mountain View, LLC 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 860- l 0700 Michael Gravelin 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 860-01075 Aurthur & Lexi Rye 1075 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 284 C Munson Earth Moving 248 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01020 Burlington Properties, LTD 12270 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) E,M-V-�Clu DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 AUGUST 2008 words "outside storage" to "outside display." Mr. Dinklage suggested language that would require removal of the outside display on a daily basis. Mr. White was OK with that. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Design Review Application #DR-08-07 and Site Plan Application #SP-08-67 of Patrick Malone subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 14. Site Plan Application #SP-08-68 of HVM Corp., Inc., to amend a previously approved plan for an 8000 sq. ft. GFA building with 4000 sq. ft. of general office use and 4000 sq. ft. of medical office use. The amendment consists of expanding the parking lot, 150 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Forcier said the building will not be expanded in any way. They will simply add 20 more spaces in order to handle parking for seminars, etc., from time to time. They will keep as many of the existing trees as possible. Mr. Belair asked about landscaping. Mr. Dinklage suggested requiring a new landscaping plan to be prepared to the satisfaction of city staff. The applicant did not understand stipulation #7 and agreed to work it out with the City Engineer. If there is any issue, the applicant will come back to the Board. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-08-68 of HVM Corp, Inc., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. .'Final Plat Application #SD-08-37 of East Mountain View, LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for a 24,400 sq. ft. 2-story medical office building. The amendment consists of revising the location of a shared water line easement, 1100 Hinesburg Road: Ms. Lisius said the line is located at the south end of the property. The applicant shares the water line easement with the property to the south. The question arose as to why parking spaces have not been available. Ms. Lisius said the building is not completely finished, so the underground parking is being secured. Mr. Belair said the parking spaces must be available. Mr. Belair noted that the development notice wasn't picked up, so it was never displayed. Abutters were notified. Mr. Dinklage said he was comfortable moving forward, but advised the applicant that the development notice should have been picked up. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-08-37 of East Mountain View, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7- AbbyUsiuS |rudoUConsulting Engineers PC>Box 3OG Re: Minutes — #SO-08-37. 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Lisius: For your records, enclosed iaacopy ofthe approved August 19.2OO8Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant End. r 14 R •.�..WE /'` southburlinoon PLANNING & ZONING August 20, 2008 Abby Lisius Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Lisius: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on August 19, 2008 (effective 8/19/08). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 180 days (must be submitted & recorded by February 13 2009) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Q-&f E)rov� Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 6345 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com - J11V VV Q11U lCll. V1JC11 View and post up to post & browse. ads{ 6 photos per ad online. at your convenience. 'man Baldwin, P.E: Adopted 7/9/2008; Published PUBLIC HEARING One National Life Drive STATE OF VERMONT Director -Technical. 7/30/2008; Effective 9/20/2008 SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 STACHITE OF VE COUNTY; SS. MENT REVIEW BOARD Telephone: (802) 828-2717 CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT Material in [Brackets] delete. DOCKET NO. S899-06 CnC Mate Hat- underlined add. The South Burlington Development A description of the methodology '/9/2608; Published.: Review Board will hold a public used in establishing this goal can Long Beach Mortgage Company a B; Effective 8/20/2008 OPENINGS hearing at the South Burlington be viewed for 30 days following Delaware Corporation, BURLINGTON CITY COMMIS- City Hall Conference Room, 575- the date of this notice during nor- Plaintiff i [Brackets] delete. SIONS/BOARDS Dorset Street, South Burlington;' mat business hours at the above v. nderLined add. Vermont on Tuesday, August 19, address. It is also available for William E. McMahon, Amy L. Mc - On Monday, 5eptember,15, 2008, 2008 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the viewing on our websitec.http:// Mahon, State of Vermont Depart- rON DEVELOPMENT the'Burlington City Council will following: aring Notice —August Commissions/Boardswww.aot.state.vt.us/CivilRights/ merit of Taxes, Sargent Construe !OARD fill vacancies on the following City Documents/VTransDBEGoalFY09. tion, Inc., Vermont Engine : 1. Appeal #AO-08-14 of Century pdf Service, Inc. And Occupants Partners, LP appealing the deci- residing at 53 Cloverdale Road,. Cemetery Commission sion'of the Administrative Officer Comments pertaining to this Underhill, Vermont", Term expires 6/30/11 to deny Certificate of Occupancy overall goal will ;be accepted at. Defendantr rgton Development One Opening #CO-08-26., 2 Market St. the above referenced. address for lard will hold a .public a period of fifteen days follow- NOTICE OF SALE n Tuesday,August 19; CCRPC (Alternate) = 2. Final plat application #SD-08- ing the completion of the thirty :00 p.m. in Contois Audi- Term expires 7/31/10 37 of East Mountain View, LLC day notice period. Comments will By virtue and in execution of ty Hatt to consider the: One Opening to amend n previously approved also be accepted by the Federal the Power Sale contained in applications: plan for a 24, 400 sq. ft. 2 Highway. Administration, Vermont a certain mortgage given by Development Review Board (ALt.) story medical office building. The Division; Federal Building, P.O. FLexpoint Funding Corporation to VR/08-865CA; 185 South Term expires 6/30/11 amendment consists of revising Box 568, Montpelier, VT 05601. William E. McMahon dated October (WRL, Ward 5) Peter One Opening the location of a shared water Line "18, 2005 and recorded in Volume :rits Verdonk easement, 1100 Hinesburg Rd. Additional information about 149, Page 199 of the Land Records single family home and Fence Viewer our DBE Program, including our of the Town of Underhill, of which ith new single family Term expires 6/30/09 3. Preliminary plat application current DBE Registry, certifica- mortgage the undersigned is the hiding front yard setback Three Openings Police Commission #SDc08-39 of Pizzagalli Properties, tion application, resource guides present holder, for breach of the equest Term expires 6/30/10 LLC for a planned unit develop- and links to other small busi- conditions of said mortgage and One Opening went to subdivide a 14.54 acre ness resources can be obtained for the purposes of foreclosing MA/CA; 52 North Cove parcel into three (3) lots of 5.73 by visiting the DBE page of our the same will be sold at Public N, Ward 7) Tim Muir Board of Tax Appeals acres (lot #6), 7.8 acres (lot #7), website at: http://www.aot.state. • Auction at 8:00 A.M. on August surfage parking lot Term expires 6/30/10 and 1.01 acres (lot #8), 47 Tilley vt.us/CivitRights/Dbe.htm 13, 2008, at 53 Cloverdale Road, to wetlands remanded Two Openings Drive. Underhill, Vermont all singular r Environmental Court ALLfirms, both DBE and non- the premises described in said Board of Tax Appeals : 4. Final plat application #SD-08- DBE, are invited to contact the mortgage: be viewed in the Plan- Term expires 6/30/11 - 40 of Pizzagatli Properties, LLC Vermont Agency of Transportation Zoning office, (City Hall, Two Openings to amend a previously approved for information regarding bidding To Wit: r, 149'Church Street, planned unit development consist- opportunitieson federally funded Being all and the same land and 6), between the hours of Telecommunications Advisory _ing of 54,324 sq. ft.' (49,000 sq. projects. premises conveyed to William E. and 4:30 p.m. Comm. ft, usable) medical office build- McMahon and Amy L. McMahon by Term expires 6/30/10 . ing. The amendment consists of Dated July 25, 2008 at Montpelier, • Warranty Deed of. Devin Wilson and ite, AICP, Director of One Opening constructing a 1700 sq. ft. single Vermont Steffani Wilson dated 4 September and Zoning story addition to house an MRI 2003 and recorded. in Volume 130, Board for Registration of Voters machine, 192 Tilley Drive. STATE OF VERMONT Page 183 of the Land Records of is who ,require special Term expires 6/30/12 CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. the Town of Underhill. �ntsto participate are One Opening John Dinklage, Chairman CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR "COURT sd to contact the Depart oc"South Burlington Development DOCKET N0:.1279-07 CnC Terms of Sale: $10,000:00 to be -ast 72 hours in advance. Applications are available at the,,,-.,, Review Board paid in+cash by purchaser at cation call 845.7188 Cterk/Treasurer's Office, Second EverHome Mortgage Company, time of sale, with the balance due 2 TTY.). Floor City Hall, and must be re- Copies of the, applications are Plaintiff at closing -Proof of financing for ceived in the Clerk/Treasurer's Of available for public inspection at v. the balance of the purchase to be LURLINGTON fice by 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, Sep- the South Burlington City.Hall. Ebru Tega Esi And Occupants provided at the time of sate. The REGULATIONS tember 10, 2008: Applicants must residing at 128 Country Club Drive sale is subject to taxes due and be nominated by a member of July 30, 2008 East, South Burlington, Vermont, owing to' the Town of Underhill. ving traffic regulations the City Council to be considered - Defendants y enacted by the Public fora position; a list of Council PUBLIC NOTICE Other terms to be announced nmission as amendments members is also available at the NOTICE OF SALE at the sale or inquire at Lobe & lix C, Motor Vehicles; and ClerkAreasurer's Office. Please call Vermont Agency of Transportation Fortin; 30 Kimball Ave.; Ste. 306, if Burlington's Code of the Cterk/Treasurer's Office at 865- Disadvantaged Business Enterprise By virtue and in execution of South Burlington, VT 05403, 802 . '•s: 7.136 for further information. - (DBE) ) the Power of Sale contained in a 660-9000: Overall Annual Goal on FHWA- certain mortgage given by Flagstar Jo parking except with - The City of Burlington encourages Funded Projects - Bank, FSB to Ebru Tega Esi_dated Long Beach Mortgage Company, a parking permit. persons frorm diverse backgrounds September 20,2005 and recorded Delaware Corporation to apply to serve on_boards,2om For Fiscal Year October 1, 2008 in Volume 728, Page 277 of the i shall park any ve- missions and committees. The City through September 30, 2009 : Land Records of the Town 'of South By: Joshua B. Lobe, Esq. ,pt vehicles with a valid is committed to providing equal Burlington, of which mortgage lobe & Fortin, PLC )arking permit or a valid opportunity to all persons without Pursuant to US Department the undersigned is the present 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306 ;s and clearly identifiable regard to political affiliation, of Transportation regulations holder, for breach of the condi- South Burlington, VT 05403 delivery vehicles on any race, color, religion, age, sex, - contained. in 49 Code of Federal tions of said mortgage and for the ;ignated as "residential sexual preference, national origin, Regulations, Part 26, all state purposes of foreclosing the same disability or any other non -merit transportation agencies receiv will be sold at Public Auction at factor, ing Department of Transportation' 9:00 A.M. on August 13, 2008, s designated for residers- financial.assistance must establish at 128 Country Club Drive East, > a at all times include. PARKS - overall percentage goats for the South Burlington; Vermont all and CITY PARKS ENUMERATED dollar value of work to be awarded singular the premi--- described in As Written isadvantaged businesses. This said mortgage: , That Chapter 22, Parks, of the action has been deemed necessary i_ side of Cotches- Code of Ordinances of the City in order to provide these busi To Wit: July 29, 2008 East Mountain View, LLC 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner Enclosed is a copy of a public hearing notice that was printed in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Abigail Lisius, PE (:0s�, �i D 5;-J4 r,e.0 80` E«y"a tax 0112 UA t.O« 1 'av w.sam July 29, 2008 Gamal Eltabbakh 391 Hillspoint Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 7s Durs t Strv,zt rt asriieg i *, VT'15,161 9%1 b02. 4 6.1106 l x H122 4t.4101 wwaW,%huti..Ca July 29, 2008 Rye Associates, LLC c/o Alan Bartlett, Registered Agent 25 Pinecrest Drive Essex Junction, VT 05452 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. {f"s Cjrr G str t. ; .>S A .rtEn(11an, VT 050c: twi P[7:. .LIUM fzx 862,2464`01 ww%,Ibar i a0, m July 29, 2008 Munson Earth Moving c/o John Jaeger 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely<- B Betsy cDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 57 Dflrs t St-rel Soath VT DSV53 iel 802 fiAgaiM 4 xs 0021 4 : A$fit www,xburl,com July 29, 2008 Burlington Properties, LTD 85 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 7Durset trze t: 9-11A fivrlinglmm, VT D5463 W be 4 t� � €�t��. �1• .wt t ��e ta�ec ,�� a /1 July 29, 2008 CEA Properties, LLC 10 Mansfield View Ln South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, magD BetsyV nough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. List of Abutters East Mountain View, LLC 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 860-10700 �M 0, MichVinesb i 1060 Ro t���'Southn, VT 403 860-01075 �� 5 urth & ex' yeAsnoctaVf",- � 1UBurlington, i burg RoadS VT 05403 C(okir I 1155-00284 Munson Earth Moving 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 0860-01020 BurliiWon Properties, LTD outh Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01150 CEA Properties, LLC 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) E MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner G-) RE: Agenda #15, Final Plat application #SD-08-37 DATE: July 11, 2008 East Mountain View LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking final plat approval to amend a previously approved plan for a 24, 400 sq. ft. 2 story medical office building. The amendment consists of revising the location of a shared water line easement, 1100 Hinesburg Rd. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: There are no changes to the dimensional requirements as part of this application. Water Line The applicant is proposing to relocate the shared water line based on changes which occurred during construction. The Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans and stated that he has no concerns about this proposal and recommends approval. Other Upon review of this application, Staff visited the subject property and found several issues of concern which the board may address as part of this application. The underground parking was closed with a locked and keyed entrance. All parking which is counted towards the minimum requirements shall be accessible to the general public when the business is open. 575 Dorset Street South liington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 f- g02.846.4101 www.sbur1.com 9. All parking shall be accessible. The underground parking garage must remain open and accessible to the general public during all hours in which the businesses in the building are open. During these site visits, staff also noticed that the paved drive to the front was blocked with cones. This too shall be accessible during business hours. 2. All drives and lanes shall be accessible during all hours in which the businesses in the building are open. Staff recommends that the South Burlington Development Review Board approve Final Plat Application #SD-08-37 subject to the conditional items in the comment section of this report. N/F A. k L. RYE FOX RUN LANE __-__--- N/F M. WBGS e— Q (� 3 r^ O V LY O 0o 01'8 w z ON THIS PUT IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWiNC 1) DEEDS RESEARCHED IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS 2) A CLOSED FIELD TRAVERSE CONDUCTED WITH A TOTAL STATION ON "106. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON GRID NORTH. 3) REBARS SET ARE NO. 5 REINFORCING BARS WITH ALUMINUM CAPS STAMPED "TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LS 488 4) THIS PARCEL WAS CONVEYED TO EAST MOUNTAIN NEW, LLC IN VOLUME 754 PACE 53 SEE ALSO PLAT REFERENCE/4. 5) DISTANCES ARE SHOWN TO THE HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. BEARINGS ARE SHOWN TO THE SECOND FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. 6) AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO IDENTIFY OR DEUNEATE EASEMENTS• RIGHTS OF WAY, LEASE LANDS, ENCROACHMENTS. ETC OBSERVED IN THE FIELD OR READILY FOUND IN THE LAND RECORDS. ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 7) PLAT REFERENCE 14 SHOWS A PROPOSED EASEMENT ACROSS SUBJECT PARCEL TO ACCESS PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. NO EASEMENT DEEDS WERE FOUND IN THE CITY LAND RECORDS 8) THIS LAND IS SUBJECT TO A 10' WIDE EASEMENT TO GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER AND VERIZON AS DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 800 PACE 336 AND VOLUME 803 PAGE 699. /. "MEADOWUND BUSINESS PARK, HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, YT, SUBDIVISION PLAY DATED 412JI96 BY THIS OFFICE AND RECORDED IN THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS IN MAP SLIDE 300. 2. "GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK, HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT, PLAT OF SURVEY DATED 613194 BY THIS OFFICE AND RECORDED IN THE SOUTH WRUNGTON LAND RECORDS IN MAP SLIDE 277. J. "BURUNGTTIN PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 1020 HINESBURG ROAD. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DATED 5122195 BY THIS OFFICE AND RECORDED IN THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS IN MAP SUDS 284. 1"PLAT OF SURVEY, MALCOLM WILLARD PROPERTY. HINESBURG ROAD. SOUTH BURUNGTON• VT DATED 9122199 BY WARREN ROBENSTEIN, L.S. AND RECORDED IN THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS IN MAP SLIDE 363 SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RECEIVED FOR RECORD A.O. 200— $ no. ( SET ) ■ LCNfRE1F MIXJUMENT (FOUND ) O REDn'ORGNG BAR (FOUND ) O STONE MONUMENT (FOUND % Q UPDATE ABUTTERS 7/7/Da SDT Graphk Scale ® CHANGE WATERLINE EASEMENT J41/09 BOP ® ACID EASEMENTS a ABUTTERS 5/4/07 AAt Feel ADD EA6E11ENT5 a ABUTTERS vvo7 5MT 20 0 2O 40 60 80 aeWYoat I 1)awlptlen qb ay :ONLREM MO WNT 'Tn ° 4, j V E D JUL 16 2008 y of SO- Burlington SEWER LINE EASEMENT CFA PROPER id.SIDUC )1NIIIIgI11kn�I�� Boundary Plat D,aMfta�W 2006090-40 ,.. I y SDD T EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC D. a � T'TeMa1 >es• JMM Dunn AFC TAnoR s >* N0 ABa *` 1100 Hinesburg Road C9 CE O D. _ 08/28/06 South Burlington, VT ���I//lnv�ryl rylllN��a - D� TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TICE)" 263 zx 478 DOUR !mk Road y. O. a- 858 wnt VeDaom 08495 Law 819-mm AP9TaT'0d i-400.41 «401.31 =399.41 N ARTHUR & LEXIE RYE CATCH BASIN 399.80 '397.48 11 �m FOX RUN LANE N/F M. DUBOIS LEGEND NOTES: ex STFVG =%TI lG EXFSrNG OWNER OF RECORD: SEWER MAINS xasr AMN9TTA9N Yff W tt[ AND N _____ --- -- ---_a ---- SEWER MANHOLE (SMH) /� - CONCRETE MONUMENT O Arnt aAND LAASgI R MAINSSERVICE _______-__ R__________ C!-EANOUT (CO) � (FOUND) Srm WRtlsroN AOAD jg f -. AND SERVICES A D STEEL RERAR (FOUND) O W6r151CN, VT air% TAX aLtf NINTHS AUf 44 fMQl OBQO011Op STORM DRAINAGE ___________ p ---------- CATCH BASIN (CS) 2 RERAR SET 0OR WTD P.«o.w ypMMr 46t Pwr+ ISMba LIOUIO PROPANE NATURAL GAS ___________a__________ YARD DRAIN (1D) OVERHEAD POWER ---------- pnp--------- OUR. OR END SECnON FOR STORM WATER (FES) y UNDERGROUND POWER ----------- --------- VALVE D° CURB STOP (CS) A (� J UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND FIRE HYDRANT (HYO) I� CABLE TELENSION ___________cT7__________ END CAP J PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD U17LI7Y POLE.. CURB - ___ ___ ___ MTOR ti ell PROPERTY LINE TRANSFORMER y- Imb2.82 EASEMENTS ______________'- - TELEPHONE PEDESTAL D BOLLARD LIGHT PEDESTAL 11 ' LUMNAIRE PEDESTAL F <, TCE CONTROL POINT A STEEL RERAR CATCH BASIN NIF RIM=J91.23 N/F i SEWER MANHOLE RN-J85.80 (YD) a" MICHAEL GRAVEUN 386.57 9N-3a5.a6 (Rd) 8" d 1=38C27 BUR INGTON PROPERTIES LTD .72 SEWER SEWER NANNOLE - - - - -- -- - " -----------'------�cnoN ---------------- -"5---------- - - --Y �a3ao.z7 r=403.e2 - ----- --------- _ _ __ _ _ 1«399.02 _ iOUT-385.75 15' 0 I. 399.07 YARD DRAIN --PRECAST CONCRETE 20' UTILITY EASEMENT r-396.00 BLOCK RETAINING WALL ___-9_�' 5- > W IOUT-389.80 8' _______ _g ________.___________ HYDRANT XYORANT ti PAVED / GENERA STONE EMERGENCY �JI Q�YO /- i TRANSFORM / DRIVE NO GAS SERWCE PAD la fl.r / 10'x10' CONCRETE-- / SPILLWAY "P iQ_-�` Y• DUMPSTER PAD D _ _ MET, R`\ 'f BERM 70 ,\` r ` - _s^ r.l ELEVATION - END �� nq5 •'>v\ END OF 386.5 NUNE WATER LEVEL \V F>. 7 } i�-'S '4�' _ CURB ��-' CONTROL STRUCTURE STRUCTURE GARAGE DOOR s _ _ ��1` - / i=383.70 COI & MAN DOOR - •Q i DTI BFE=3.9 0. BOLLARD --CONQRE� x2 11 _ - PEDESTALL Pao Ili (T>PJ PVC I SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 4 1 2D'A 2 PAM PAVED END OF _ DIVE CURB END OF CURB 1 PAVED DRIVE ', II 24,4W sq. ft. Medical Of. Building FFE-403.95 i-CO:-.-.- i BFE=392.00 GARAGE DOC k MAN OOO PAYED DRIVE PAVED PARKING LOT CATCH BASIN T=J87.36 STORMWATER 11264.85 POND TOUT=384.85 WS.E.=3B3.7' PACT PAVED CNANNEL 1 O PARKING LOT PEDESTAL (TIP) PAVED PARKING LOT EASEMENT -TO' WATER EASEMENT n `Uyj FES GRASS CHANN .--.-,_-- PAVED �ATCN BASIN PARKING LOT-389.60 CATCH BASIN PAVED 9N=3B6.45 12• -391.76 DRIVE 9N=386.60(FO)8' i)N-38735 (YD)B' IOUTm386.45 15" 9N=J88.05(FROd RETAIN WALL)"" LOUT-38700 12' -390 35 KNIT-386.35 12• ��---GRASS CHANNEL STONE ENERGY DISSIPATER Graphic Scale Feet 20 0 20 40 60 80 TOP BERM ELEVA PON- 365.5 STORMWATER ' POND W.S.E.«384.4' I O N- 77 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (tCE) 478 B1& Rak Road P.O.6a 30B MO2) 879-63311pt ) VANSI 4 Venwllt Osm (B02) 8794B Ob4 nat us on cle wtv a0 www.TTIpuILnDuwtg.wm TTRa rLnTa Aa avTAw noR Tes. rueoa. oA CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL SlOM6.SON PREll111WAYY APPROVAL s1IDM6SdN FINAL APPROVAL S SM1590N RD RFLODmW NG am atn wTunvw+oT a aR DaA t �tae��pm«<d m<«emntm arc ulew.e ur a«i+*Dmr Wmmxs meY as rmf NMI m mtl�q•�Hy w r�me�� Menx� ka. 2 UVWpv. pmpmM b conetvctlon an HfaMetl lv Ds a«s F we)mael<n .M, canlract tracwwnd l�eeaaYIc w/cm/iaclw atreanmd m4 d Dv dP� m<N aaM�.Xx�o Nfn � Y wa a�Ppnlao Die nd«�fpAr, er myaau t«.w..w oo.�/ trot aemv rrq✓eemd Net (Ae% s/ nw reNewl 1 me mo p- w iM 4m+wW exan De c«Nbree�«1'Mu' APGmM mw dvY n«M1n abte aM IxW agvoM. 1. Aa MaDwnmb W ewrk< deae 4«•Nge mE cap!« ba«/ ue DwHr m. N. f.apwlr [xaaw• �p +xe xuwsga m �Y Ue nwEe OY de ENHea. ar�n n u� ...y«a.eNy ro .w.. rod wr <anfoma up m« 9 +0 4� f .• N R-i R - Protect Location REcE�vE - No. I'acRpB°" DtPe ``VUTTtOF I VErrU7Y%/ cityl0 S0" '* NOCANL 7 ITF= � <TTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSATCE) TF95 PLAN IS SNT- FOR THE PURPOSE OF A •RECORD DRAWIN[• THIS PLAN 15 BASED OF/ ACNAL FIELD LOCA nON OF SURFACE EWOENCE >'AKEN N JANUARY, 10p8 BY TRUDELL CONSULDNG EN. /XE ACNAL UNDERGROUND LOCAPGN MAY VARY SIGHTLY FROM THIS PLAN. THE PROPERTY UNES SNOWH ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED UPON A BOUNDARY SURVEY PERI'DAMED BY IRIS OFFICE (REFERENCE TO DRAWNG 02p CIIOo-40 AND LAST REVISED ON 5/4/07) EEFORE USING tHFSE PLANS ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE Tm LATEST RyVISUDN LAST REVISED: 6/2/08 i ttTaca� `� 1 "/r/TiVN_ pmctnne East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT -Record Drawing Drawing Nwribv: 2006090-90 Fnttlubn: I ProjedDidllP$c: M 113 w . BGP Date: z/D8/o6 F 43 SWez ,•=20' Pmlet%Te(titlfCC: -W, 2006OWd-T Bath Me: XXX June 24, 2008 Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Ray: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com Enclosed is an application for Final Plat approval for the East Mountain View project located at 1100 Hinesburg Road. The project has been constructed, but a record survey revealed that the shared water line, namely the shared hydrant, had been installed several feet from where it was shown on the original design plan. Because the water line is shared with the neighboring property to the south, a 10' water easement is required. Enclosed are 5 full-sized copies and one reduced copy of both the Plat and the Record Drawing. Revisions to the Plat are limited to the 10' water line easement on the south side of the property. The Record Drawing also shows the water easement, as well as as -built conditions on the property. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS J -�'A�" Abigail �Lisius Encl. Site Plan cc. Rand Larson Steve Connor P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting Permit Number SD- v�; - bi CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) East Mountain View, LLC 1100 Hinesburg Rd, South Burlington, VT 05403 p (802) 862-1808 f (802) 862-6664 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 461, pos. 451-452 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) same as owner 4) CONTACT PERSON (Person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address phone& fax #) Abigail Lisius, PE Trudell Consulting Engineers, P.O. Box 308, Williston, VT 05495 p (802) 879-6331 f (802) 879-0060 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 1100 Hinesburg Road 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0860-01100 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 2-storv, 24,400 sq. ft. medical office building with underground parking has been approved and has been constructed b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Applicant would like to adjuste teh location of the shared water line easement on their property so that it matches the location of the installed shared water line. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) building footprint is 12, 310 sq, ft. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Building will show two stories in the front and three stories in the rear (two office plus one parking). e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) NIA f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) same as approved g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. Only the water line easement location will change. 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? no wetlands on the b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: 2.43 acres—105850 sq. A (acres /sq. ft.) b) Building Coverage: Existing 12,310 square feet Proposed 12,310 square feet 11.6 11.6 % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 52,787 square feet 49.8 2 Proposed 52,787 square feet 49.8 % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing 3,615 square feet 25.3 Proposed 3,615 square feet 25.3 % 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: no constr. sq. ft. * *Projects disturbing more than on -half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking no waivers required 12) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $ same as approved b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ same as approved c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) N/A 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) same as approved b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) same as approved c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) same as approved 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION same as approved 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION same as approved 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE immediately following approval 3 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS — please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. see attached sheet 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). [ hereby certify that all the rma n re uest d :sOrt f this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my, kno ledge OFO-R(WERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: 2/complete Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee 4 Date Acadia Insurance - Performance Bond AIA Document A 312 Any singular reference to Contractor, Surety, Owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable. CONTRACTOR (Name and Address): SURETY (Name and Principal Place of Business): GREEN MOUNTAIN LANDSCAPING,INC P o B o x " 0 3 0 7 Acadia Insurance Company M O R R I S V I L L E, VT 05661 One Acadia Commons OWNER (Name and Address): Westbrook, Maine 04098 - 5010 CITY ofSOUTH BURLINGTON, VT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Date June 7 2007 Amount: $ 3 9, 5 0 b Description (Name and Location): East Mountain View Drive ,landscape bond BOND Date (Not earlier than Construction Contract Date): June 7, 2007 Amount: 3 9, 500.00 Modifications o this Bond: ® None O See Page 3 CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL Gre Name and Title: Lan*0,15-apin (Any additional signatures appear on page 3) SURETY eal) Company: (Corporate `peal) Inc Acadia Insuranc p Si ame and Ti (FOR INFORMATION ONLY —Name, Addre-ss and Tetephcne) AGENT or BROKER: OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE (Architect, Engineer or otter party): AIA DOCUMENT A 312 - PERFORMANCE BOND AND PAYMENT BOND - DECEMBER 1984 ED - AIA 19 1 The Contractor and the Surety, jointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the Owner for the performance of the Construction Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference. 2 If the Contractor performs the Construction Contract, the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond, except to participate in conferences as provided in Subparagraph 3.1. 3 If there is no Owner Default, the Surety's obligation under this Bond shall arise after: 3.1 The Owner has notified the Contractor and the Surety at its address described in Paragraph 10 below that the Owner is considering declaring a Contractor Default and has requested and attempted to arrange a conference with the Contractor and the Surety to be held not later than fifteen days after receipt of such notice to discuss methods of performing the Construc- tion Contract. If the Owner, the Contractor and the Surety agree, the Contractor shall be allowed a reason- able time to perform the Construction Contract, but such an agreement shall not waive the Owner's right, if any, subsequently to declare a Contractor Default; and 3.2 The Owner has declared a Contractor Default and formally terminated the Contractor's right to complete the contract. Such Contractor Default shall not be de- clared earlier than twenty days after the Contractor and the Surety have received notice as provided in Sub- paragraph 3.1; and 3.3 The Owner has agreed to pay the Balance of the Contract Price to the Surety in accordance with the terms of the Construction Contract or to a contractor selected to perform the Construction Contract in accor- dance with the terms of the contract with the Owner. 4 When the Owner has satisfied the conditions of Para- graph 3, the Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's ex- pense take one of the following actions: 4.1 Arrange for the Contractor, with consent of the Owner, to perform and complete the Construction Contract; or 4.2 Undertake to perform and complete the Construc- tion Contract itself, through its agents or through inde- pendent contractors; or 4.3 Obtain bids or negotiated proposals from qualified contractors acceptable to the Owner for a contract for performance and completion of the Con- struction Contract, arrange for a contract to be pre- pared for execution by the Owner and the contractor selected with the Owner's concurrence, to be secured with performance and payment bonds executed by a qualified surety equivalent to the bonds issued on the Construction Contract, and pay to the Owner the amount of damages as described in Paragraph 6 in ex cess of the Balance of the Contract Price incurred by the Owner resulting from the Contractor's default; or 4.4 Waive its right to perform and complete, arrange for completion, or obtain a new contractor and with reasonable promptness under the circumstances: .1 After investigation, determine the amount for which it may be liable to the Owner and, as soon as practicable after the amount is deter- mined, tender payment therefor to the Owner; or .2 Deny liability in whole or in part and notify the Owner citing reasons therefor. S If the Surety does not proceed as provided in Paragraph 4 with reasonable promptness, the Surety shall be deemed to be in default on this Bond fifteen days after receipt of an additional written notice from the Owner to the Surety demanding that the Surety perform its obligations under this Bond, and the Owner shall be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner. If the Surety proceeds as provided in Subparagraph 4.4, and the Owner refuses the payment tendered or the Surety has denied liability, in whole or in part, without further notice the Owner shall be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner. 6 After the Owner has terminated the Contractor's right to complete the Construction Contract, and if the Surety elects to act under Subparagraph 4.1, 4.2, or 4.3 above, then the responsibilities of the Surety to the Owner shall not be greater than those of the Contractor under the Construction Contract, and the responsibilities of the Owner to the Surety shall not be greater than those of the Owner under the Construction Contract. To the limit of the amount of this Bond, but subject to commitment by the Owner of the Balance of the Contract Price to mitigation of costs and damages on the Construction Contract, the Sure- ty is obligated without duplication for: 6.1 The responsibilities of the Contractor for correc- tion of defective work and completion of the Construc- tion Contract; 6.2 Additional legal, design professional and delay costs resulting from the Contractor's Default, and re- sulting from the actions or failure to act of the Surety under Paragraph 4; and 6.3 liquidated damages, or if no liquidated damages are specified in the Construction Contract, actual dam- ages caused by delayed performance or non-perfor- mance of the Contractor. 7 The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner or others for obligations of the Contractor that are unrelated to the Con- struction Contract, and the Balance of the Contract Price shall not be reduced or set off on account of any such unrelated obligations. No right of action shall accrue on this Bond to any person or entity other than the Owner or its heirs, executors, administrators or successors. 8 The Surety hereby waives notice of any change, includ- ing changes of time, to the Construction Contract or to related subcontracts, purchase orders and other obliga- tions_ 9 Any proceeding, legal or equitable, under this Bond may be instituted in any court of competent jurisdiction in the location in which the work or part of the work is located and shall be instituted within two years after Contractor Default or within two years after the Contractor ceased working or within two years after the Surety refuses or fails to perform its obligations under this Bond, whichever oc- curs first. If the provisions of this Paragraph are void or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation avail- able to sureties as a defense in the jurisdiction of the suit shall be applicable. 10 Notice to the Surety, the Owner or the Contractor shall be mailed or delivered to the address shown on the sig- nature page. 11 When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement in the location where the construction was to be performed, any provision in this Bond conflicting with said statutory or legal requirement shall be deemed deleted herefrom and provisions con- forming to such statutory or other legal requirement shall be deemed incorporated herein. The intent is that this Bond shall be construed as a statutory bond and not as a common law bond. 12 DEFINITIONS 12.1 Balance of the Contract Price: The total amount payable by the Owner to the Contractor under the Construction Contract after all proper adjustments have been made, including allowance to the Con - MODIFICATIONS TO THIS BOND ARE AS FOLLOWS: tractor of any amounts received or to be received by the Owner in settlement of insurance or other claims for damages to which the Contractor is entitled, re- duced by all valid and proper payments made to or on behalf of the Contractor under the Construction Con- tract. 12.2 Construction Contract: The agreement between the Owner and the Contractor identified on the sig- nature page, including all Contract Documents and changes thereto. 12.3 Contractor Default: Failure of the Contractor, which has neither been remedied nor waived, to per- form or otherwise to comply with the terms of the Construction Contract. 12.4 Owner Default: Failure of the Owner, which has neither been remedied nor waived, to pay the Con- tractor as required by the Construction Contract or to perform and complete or comply with the other terms thereof. (Space is provided below for additional signatures of added parties, other than those appearing on the cover page.) CON AS PRINCIPAL SURETY Co any: (C:oroorate Seal) Company: (Corporate Seal) AV Signature: Signature: Name and tle: ✓ Name and Tit Address: Address: Acadia Insurance - Payment Bond Any singular reference to Contractor, Surety, Owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable. CONTRACTOR (Name and Address): Green Mountain Landscaping, Inc PO Box 307 Morrisville, Vt 05661 OWNER (Name and Address): City of South Burlington, Vermon t SURETY (Name and Principal Place of Business): Acadia Insurance Company One Acadia Commons Westbrook, Maine 04098 - 5010 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Date: June 7, 2007 Amount: $ 3 9, 500. 00 Description (Name and Location): East Mountain View Drive, landscpe bond BOND Date (Not earlier than Construction Contract Date): Amount: 36 Modifications to this Bond: None 0 See 'Page 6 C NTRACTO A P N SURETY Co any: (Corpor a1) Company: (Corporate Seal) Green n t a ands n g I c Acadia Insurance C p Signature: Signature: / 9.. Name and Title: Name and Title: (Any additional signatures appear on page 6) (FOR INFORMATION ONLY —Name, Address and Telephone) AGENT or BROKER: OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE (Architect, Engineer or other party): AIA DOCUMENT A 312 - PERFORMANCE BOND AND PAYMENT BOND - DECEMBER 1984 ED - AIA 1 The Contractor and the Surety, jointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the Owner to pay for labor, materials and equipment furnished for use in the perfor- mance of the Construction Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference. 2 With respect to the Owner, this obligation shall be null and void if the Contractor: 2.1 Promptly makes payment, directly or indirectly, for all sums due Claimants, and 2.2 Defends, indemnifies and holds harmless the Owner from all claims, demands, liens or suits by any person or entity who furnished labor, materials or equipment for use in the performance of the Construc- tion Contract, provided the Owner has promptly noti- fied the Contractor and the Surety (at the address de- scribed in Paragraph 12) of any claims, demands, liens or suits and tendered defense of such claims, demands, liens or suits to the Contractor and the Surety, and provided there is no Owner Default. 3 With respect to Claimants, this obligation shall be null and void if the Contractor promptly makes payment, di- rectly or indirectly, for all sums due. 4 The Surety shall have no obligation to Claimants under this Bond until: 4.1 Claimants who are employed by or have a direct contract with the Contractor have given notice to the Surety (at the address described in Paragraph 12) and sent a copy, or notice thereof, to the Owner, stating that a claim is being made under this Bond and, with sub- stantial accuracy, the amount of the claim. 4.2 Claimants who do not have a direct contract with the Contractor: .1 Have furnished written notice to the Con- tractor and sent a copy, or notice thereof, to the Owner, within 90 days after having last performed labor or last furnished materials or equipment included in the claim stating, with substantial accuracy, the amount of the claim and the name of the party to whom the mate- rials were furnished or supplied or for whom the labor was done or performed; and .2 Have either received a rejection in whole or in part from the Contractor, or not received with- in. 30 days of fumishing the above notice any communication from the Contractor by which the Contractor has indicated the claim will be paid directly or indirectly; and 3 Not having been paid within the above 30 dars, have sent a written notice to the Surety (at the address described in Paragraph 12) anti sent a copy, or notice thereof, to the Owner, stating that a claim is being made under this Bond and enclosing a copy of the previous written notice furnished to the Contractor. 5 if a notice required by Paragraph 4 is given by the Owner to the Contractor or to the Surety, that is sufficient compli- ance. 6 When the Claimant has satisfied the conditions of Para- graph 4, the Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's ex- pense take the following actions: 6.1 Send an answer to the Claimant, with a copy to the Owner, within 45 days after receipt of the claim, stating the amounts that are undisputed and the basis for chal- lenging any amounts that are disputed. 6.2 Pay or arrange for payment of any undisputed amounts. 7 The Surety's total obligation shall not exceed the amount of this Bond, and the amount of this Bond shall be credited for any payments made in good faith by the Surety. 8 Amounts owed by the Owner to the Contractor under the Construction Contract shall be used for the perfor- mance of the Construction Contract and to satisfy claims, if any, under any Construction Performance Bond. By the Contractor furnishing and the Owner accepting this Bond, they agree that all funds earned by the Contractor in the performance of the Construction Contract are dedicated to satisfy obligations of the Contractor and the Surety under this Bond, subject to the Owner's priority to use the funds for the completion of the work. 9 The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner, Claimants or others for obligations of the Contractor that are unrelat- ed to the Construction Contract. The Owner shall not be liable for payment of any costs or expenses of any Claimant under this Bond, and shall have under this Bond no obliga- tions to make payments to, give notices on behalf of, or otherwise have obligations to Claimants under this Bond. 10 The Surety hereby waives notice of any change, includ- ing changes of time, to the Construction Contract or to related subcontracts, purchase orders and other obliga- tions. 11 No suit or action shall be commenced by a Claimant under this Bond other than in a court of competent jurisdic- tion in the location in which the work or part of the work is located or after the expiration of one year from the date (1) on which the Claimant gave the notice required by Sub- paragraph 4.1 or Clause 42 (iii), or (2) on which the last labor or service was performed by anyone or the last mate- rials or equipment were fumished by anyone under the Construction Contract, whichever of (1) or (2) first occurs. If the provisions of this Paragraph are void or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to sureties as a defense in the jurisdiction of the suit shall be applica- ble. 12 Notice to the Surety, the Owner or the Contractor shall be mailed or delivered to the address shown on the sig- nature page. Actual receipt of notice by Surety, the Owner or the Contractor, however accomplished, shall be suffi- cient compliance as of the date received at the address shown on the signature page- 13 When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement in the location where the construction was to be performed, any provision in this Bond conflicting with said statutory or legal requirement shall be deemed deleted herefrom and provisions con- forming to such statutory or other legal requirement shall be deemed incorporated herein. The intent is that this Bond shall be construed as a statutory bond and not as a common law bond. 14 Upon request by any person or entity appearing to be a potential beneficiary of this Bond, the Contractor shall promptly furnish a copy of this Bond or shall permit a copy to be made. 15 DEFINITIONS 15.1 Claimant: An individual or entity having a direct contract with the Contractor or with a subcontractor of the Contractor to furnish labor, materials or equip- ment for use in the performance of the Contract. The intent of this Bond shall be to include without limita- tion in the terms "labor, materials or equipment" that part of water, gas, power, light, heat, oil, gasoline, telephone service or rental equipment used in the MODIFICATIONS TO THIS BOND ARE AS FOLLOWS: Construction Contract, architectural and engineering services required for performance of the work of the Contractor and the Contractor's subcontractors, and all other items for which a mechanic's lien may be asserted in the jurisdiction where the labor, materials or equipment were furnished. 15.2 Construction Contract: The agreement between the Owner and the Contractor identified on the sig- nature page, including all Contract Documents and changes thereto. 15.3 Owner Default: Failure of the Owner, which has neither been remedied nor waived, to pay the Con- tractor as required by the Construction Contract or to perform and complete or comply with the other terms thereof. (Space is provided below for additional signatures of aided parties, other than those appearing on the cover page.) AS PRINCIPAL (Corporate Sep!) SURETY Company: ( orporate deal) Signature: Name and Title: LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY POA 95243-1 Acadia Insurance Company Westbrook, Maine WARNING: THIS POWER INVALID IF NOT PRINTED ON GREEN BACKGROUND will I GREEN BORDER KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: that Acadia Insurance Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maine, having its principal office in the City of Westbrook, Maine (the "Company'), does hereby make, constitute and, oint Ted Lambert an Heather Pierce of Morrisville, Vermont individually, its true and lawful Attorney -in -Fact, wit(tic �ppowcrand authority hereby conferred, to sign, execute, acknowledge and deliver for and on its behalf, as surety, any and all bonds, recognizances, stipulations, and suretyship undertakings and obligations of all kinds, excluding, however, any bonds or undertakings guaranteeing payment of loans, notes or other evidences of indebtedness or the interest thereon; provided, however, that the authority granted hereunder is expressly matte subject to the following limitations: Single Obligation Limit: $5,000,000 Types of bonds, recognizances stipulations and undertakings excluded: None Acadia Insurance Company further certifies that this Power of Attorney is granted and is executed and sealed under and by anfhorily of the following resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Acadia Insurance Company at a meeting duly called and belt) on the I st day of December 1993, to wit: RESOLVED: That any one of the president, executive vice president or vice president, underwriting may appointattorneys-in-fact or agents with authority as defined or limited in the instrument evidencing the appointment in each case, for and on behalf of the Company to execute and deliver and affix the seal of the Company to bonds, stipulations, recognizances and suretyship undertakings and obligations of all kinds; and any one of said officers may remove any such attorney -in -fact or agent and revoke any power of attorney previously granted to such person, whether or not such officer appointed the attorney -in -fact or agent. That any bond, recognizance, stipulation or suretyship undertaking or obligation shall be valid and binding upon the Company, RESOLVED: (i) when signed by any one oft lie president, executive vice president or vice president, underwriting and sealed with the Company seal; or (ii) when duly executed and sealed with the Company seal by one m more attorneys -in -fact or agents pursuant to and within the limits of authority evidenced by the power of attorney issuer) by the Company to such person or persons, a certified copy of which power of attorney must be attached thereto in order for such obligation to be binding upon the Company. RESOLVED: That the signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or other suretyship obligations of the Company and such signaune and seal then so used shnll have the same force and effect as though manually affixed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Acadia Insurance Company has caused its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be duly executed by its duly authorized officer as ofthe 14th day of August, 2000. (Corporate Seal) STATE OF MAINE CUMBERLAND COUNTY /j/ Acacliat Insurance Company SuRANgp p/.,,,�� �\t O.ORPO,p •. �O� U: �O -,tic.• a NO 1992 i t By William C. Thornton, Its President On this day, before the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said District, personally appeared the above named officer of Acadia Insurance Company, tome personally known to be the individual and officer who executed the preceding instrument, and acknowledged the execution of said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of the Acadia Insurance Company and his voluntary act and deed as an officer of said corporation, and that the seal of said corporation was affixed to said instrument by the authority and direction of the said corporation. Witness my hand and my Notarial Seal at Westbrook, Maine, the day and year last written above. (Notary Seal) LINDA CLARK NOTARY PUBLIC, MAINE MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 14, 2004 Notary Public m.po naawm m, aw.Km.a. LEGEND T,M. r. a.-w•,wAwrv.•wW, ZONING EXASTB4G PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES: 1) OWNER OF RECORD: EAST MOUNTAIN NEW LLC AT7N: RAND LA SON 5399 WILLISTON ROAD WILLISTON, VT 05495 2) LOT SIZE, 143 ACRES (USING EXISTING HWESBURG ROAD R.O.W,) Id Slz•3.2.43 iu-. JMex. Derpe ___ JMrx fWMl Ce.e aW: ,1.aW 1i,Zw16F M•c OwrMl . MW. Fran SelVrx 60% 5a0. 49.T.p% Sr.6.3 42A Mr.6M•S•m•a; JMm.Rw SMO•d >50. 3Y0. 360. a6p0. Ma.dWY He JFina Yerl Lou• N JMa. WrW 360. 3F% 10% 93.3R 25.3%3.dM 5F 19.3% PARKING: REOUNTED PROPOSED SEWER MANS ___________d__________ MEDICAL OFFICE. 24,400 FT2. 5.0 SPACES/1000 F12 - 122 SPACES 106 AND SERVICES d SEWER MANHOLE (SUN) „ • ACCESSIBLE: 5 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES 5 WATER MARLS _________-_W__-_______ SEWER CLEANOUT (CO) AND SERVICES STORM DRAINAGE ___________ p __________ d CATCH BASIN (CB) :: IS UOUID PROPANE ______________________ c OUTLET OR OR NATURALGAS ENO SECTION' 3) ZONING DI57RICT.I-0, INDUSTRIAL -OPEN SPACE TRAFFIC OVERHEAD POWER ---------- cN.--------- ++ VALVE °0 - J mNiq mmpww AVG WEEKDAY TRIPS 763 UNDERGROUND ----------- UT--------- ur CURB STOP (CS) Qe • 4) TAX MAP NUMBER: MAP 48. PARCEL 0860-01100 M "^b P°n°'•a PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS 85 TELEPHONE F'•+.I•mlW�rema BASED ON ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL-7TH EDITION LAND USE PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD FIRE HYDRANT (HID) ',`1 5) DEED REFERENCE: VOLUME MI, PACE 451-/52 • •'"'r am 720-MEDICALIVENTAL OFFICE BUILDING 41 6) USE: 24,400 SO. FT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING REQUESTED WAIVERS: GRAVEL DRIVE OR ROAD 1 3 � CAP 1) PARKING 16 PARKING SPACES (13.IS) w 2) FRONT SETBACK: 7.3' OVER FUTURE FRONT SETBACK WATER d WASTEWATER cuRe 3) BUILDING HEIGHT: &J' OVER BUILDING HEIGHT DESIGN FLOW - EPRd: 15 GPD/EMPLOYEE x 53 EMPLOYEES - 795 GPD PROPERTY UNE '1.. PLUS 40 PARENTS 0 10 GPO/PAT. - 4O0 yPQ TRANSFORMER m f-IOJ.53 I19 C?s6 EASEMENT$ _ __._____.__ ______- hTELEPHONE PEDESTAL a + 402.82 WATER: LESS N S LOW FLOW CIXRES - 1067 GPO L I { WASTEWATER: LESS 20S MUNICIPAL CONNECTION - 956 GPD TREE LINE f ,�- 16 CONTOURSTTOPOGRAPHIC .. ... ,y ............ r:F LUMNAIRE BUILDING SETBACKS - - - - BOLLARD LIGHT ! I I TRUDELL CONSUL77NC ENGINEERS (TOE) TOE CONTROL POINT A STEEL ROAR I . I 1 •. RMI-.T9T.6 8' 0-386.0 (YARD DRAW) i I.. I 15 SN-JBB.o (ROOF) sewCAWAG TON NIF F•30&0 ! SEWER MANHOLE N F 4AICHAEL GRAVELIN 386.57 30 .,. ••10 h3BO27 BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LTD ! I f A SEWER MANHOLE V .. _ _. ... .... ROW OF PINES 1-390.72 I if r.00.T.82 10-12• i h31T 27 ! I I I ,hJ99.02 1 - ✓"l _ __ -' --. ....,..ec- ,._-... -- -- ! I I ; ' YARD OFAW i PRECAST COMORE& 20' U1WTY'EASEMENI FDRAW CUNDAlION ?!T ' __ I I 11 IBAi-]0&7D f (e7Loaod(.ItETARAWP WALL p __ LAQ44<• ___ s_______ ______ ____ __ ______..d________ __ _ t! ! t. ----r- ---- - e �Dur,:am.i t--'fi Ppu -- ---- ------ --- --s- --J ---------- PRECAST---- - --�- ossNG----------�-- `_ ; __. _' I I CONE,: 005TI1/0 A STOR11-385.7 OF' RETAINING WALL SEWFR�3B7.7 . PROPOSED E1EC. i I r TRANSFORMER •p }f .:I EL .4 p I EXIS7IN /47 /Uc)Q ` ! . I O:O SEWER MANHOLE ! Y X I ' IHYDRA i PVC r0.07 / S ) 10'HO' CONCRETE DUMPSTER TCE POINT 4 / �i ELEV-3B4.02 li r-40581 ! / ' ' ` ' / f ,)f r . TCE POINT 5 \ PAD WITH FENCED ENCLOSURE € -40011 j k - filiWATQN PAD ELEV J90.4] $NOW STORAGE N-40131 fI fi i-39991 1-3UO SAM WATER LEVEL CONTROL SINUMM I : ! / PAD ARTHUR & i I i I �/ A• f1_40 .. .. ... �,. 11QN !f 2 !! it LEXIE RYE I I --_ _IPareAr 6 - .: 0 �NI' SDEXACKG / .... .. __ w�' Q SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE ...._,. r / \ 8 I SIGN IG NOT •° � � x EN1m• � T/%'91MFACE GATE-MOIMTFD SM . O ! I Q P SPACES No PARKING I I I I,l 4G SE ACK i A FR i f',,✓ i- f R"2" 1� / 10-IY PINES 2K ROW OF aq� FLUSH I O / I n Z4 40U fT a sq R ,'/ Medical_ -. bw am WATER • W ! office Building z3 I , M_ PORT[- ....P� ._ � ' ' x iI COalEia STORY W/ O ! PPILOT2 30 UNDERGROUND i.... �s.. ' PARKING SPACES j`DOLLARD (2 NC) , y.TA0M0 WALL n / i I t! i I ' t / GAS SER (k5 Appmx. FFE- 404.0 BASDIENT FLOM . _ f1--39a0 AT MIDPOW END PES %b TOWARD O� \•,� .'r ce• j c•SLOR'OfsOEC I vy� ; "• FOUNDATION DRAW (TYP)' j j iJ•'•^" 6TERF. PVC SOR 35 DROP CATCH BASH ! i foR y t S.. ) .✓ - ... .. r-399.80 I ' I CEN ( i • I / -397.48RAKWO 5'x5 PAD 1...... .. k BLP C,o111RIC INE' \ B E1.-40.15 RRi�ff •• I I / 70P I I :. PROP0.gD •A TAPaPWO ! i ! % AGE �-4AyL GARDooR - f3e). GRASS aIANNEL sun / .x..w 4' OERM ..,y4.. ...�. ....., T� sr Vutc ' 1 I YARD ORA I LIAMARE Y Q DOOR 2S Mµ THRUST FOX RUN LANEBLOCK GRAVEL DRIVE Y B 1 'i 1 POINT 2 DISSIPATER RELOCATE UNUTY I ,I •"•. ELEV-3B&27 POLE �.., yp TCE POINT 3 _...__ ..,, ELEV JB4.B8 ". XISTNG 8- WATER MAW , ' '..-..., B• Act JO' ACCE'u' 43 LF CAP VALVE THRUST BLOCK EASEMENT TO • 7 , _ �w RECREATIONALPATH 9. 'Pa ' PROPERTY TIT It" RIM-389.8 R ./ SOUTH ONLY I 12' M-J86.50 \} 7 I 1 10 ' O RIM_M 0 ... 6' M- 386.5 12'AS' EASEMENT FOR ...TCE POINT 1 10' EASEMENT FOR r M-3875 (YARD 15' IOUT-JB&45 SHARED WATER MAIN i=396.68 J 3 '" ELEVJ99.08 SNARED WATER 1Y pl/T-J87.13 EXTENSION TO BENEFIT 5'r° `3 b MAW EXTENSION/ EAST MOUNTAIN NEW, LLC N/F - .1- Graphk Scale M. DUBOIS ` ! i By OAS " rx4' TEE AND Feel 4' GATE VALVE 20 0 20 40 60 80 II TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478BWr F&*%Xd P.O.B-M8 OTOW8794331Wa.) VRRBbwm V...'t 054% mm ffnawo(IMO VWI th On Oro W4b aC-.IY6dEA1LAWa1$.WIII CONQ1fUAL APF[OVAL SUWM63TON 1NWFlJMNAWY A-0VAL SMWMasm FINAL ARWOVAL SIlM690N CONSTRUC K*1 OtANRHCS .-oddtoib.+ Hein oma e.ipo�i aa.nc•h m�nn,�tlen� w,wN4. m.r -..a W,-e.a •. a9..N. aoY.`t��•.Im �'a�irv��e.,�'e.a u.alo....h��w bwgnt ,.• In• orl-, m., iNe.x ra„w pt.:.�(rrF) �m,.� ProttKt m •a UPDATE WATER SERVICE 7/91D7 AAL ® PER WATER SUPPLY DIVISION 4/06/07 AAL ® UPDATE REAR SLOG ENTRANCE S/If107 AAL ® RELOCATE TRANSFORMER 411/07 AAL WIDEN ENTRANCE PER AOT 1/24/DI AAL ® PER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1/4/07 AM CITY STAFF COMMENTS 1/2/97 AIM St--t r 9,bmNt91 12/I3118 AAL Na D4WT *W. Da4 !/ ROVW� IOF IVER,I'�Fv�Rri a`JaiE # N aVILJ7 irk '''yll�llll�a aaa Project title East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT SheO`Fle Site Plan Dravft Nunbv: 2006090-51 Fxtualm: 1 P1o)ert Wl-w: „MM Drawn: AAL Dabs: 12/06/2006 F.O. GOO Sale: 1' - 20' Pnolea 6tiv108: xxx X-PANf t 200 "wc Bndl FSe: xxx SPI SEWER M 40181 1.400.41 1.401.31 1-399.41 CATCH B, F-399BO i-397.48 .... I9- CARP N-J9B.68 l INSPECTION NOTE LEGEND 1. VERMONT RISK EVALUATION CLASSIFIES SITE AS LOW RISK. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL SILT FENCE - '� • •� COMPLY WITH THE VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL SILT FENCE WIN LOW RISK SITE HANDBOOK FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, CONSTRUCTION LIMIT SNOW FENCE AUGUST 2006. CONSTRUCTION LIMIT SNOW FENCE 2. ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY OR UNDER ME DIRECTION OF THE dJSITE PLAN COORDINATOR AT LEAST ONCE FIERY SEVEN (7). CALENDAR DAY$. AND TEMPORARY STOCKPILE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT NO LATER THAN 24 HOURS AFTER ANY STORM EVENT WHICH GENERATES A DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE NEASUNE STASUDED CONSWUCTON ENTRANCE MAWTExAWX ADOTONAL SIDE SNALL BE ARPLIED AS —.IT.. DEMAND. ALL SEDNEN ME REAEPIRACxEO ^D• ON NA— ON. PIIBUC RO:NS SNNL WIND — WHf a' PLACEMENT BEFORE ENTERING SITE SEDIMENT BARRIERS SItENt4 DR OVER TTAPEO AREAS SHALL BE REDUCED ON RIMINX. BEFORE ENTERING THE SITE SEGMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WEN ACWMULATON REAa S 1/2 THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THE BANNER. SEGMENT SHALL BE - OVER STASU2ED AREAS WERE NO DAN— K EROSION FASTS REMOVE FENCE AND ACCUMULATED SEDMENT MIEN VEGETATION OR STE IS STABIUEED. STONE CHECNDNN CHECK FOR UNDERINxwp. REMOVE ACWMULATED SEDMI NT AFTER uPON MMPIEnd a< SwAHES AND WTETs IT REACHES 1 ME NpdT DI' DAM. REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT LL ME REMOVED WEN THE CONSTWCATION SITE HPT. AS AS PROPEMY STABUTED, INLET PROTEC— REMOVE ACWMIILATED SEDWENT AFTER EACH MAIGR STatM EVENT UPON COMPLETION 6 EATEN BASINS OR WEN SEDIMENT IS IRTHIN 4' OF TM. STONE SHALL BE REMOVED WEN THE —SWUCTION SITE HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED. PERMANENT TOPSOIL. SEEDED AREAS SHAM BE NOW AND FERTUTID. IF NECESSARY. TO W1NH b NOUNS OE REACHING -4 GHAOE SEED. AND MULGH INWK RAND ESTABUSHMENT. AREAS WEN SHOW SIGNS OF EROSION SHALL BE RESEEDED WMATELY AND MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATON 15 ESTABUSHED. STONE RIP -RAP RELgVE ACWMUlATEO SCDA 1 UPON COMPLETION OF U. µONARY SEEONG MHWERW TOt SEED DNATION AND WSEED F SEED WASN'T IMMEDIATELY A NOT WANED FDA IF ARE O Mad GERMINATED AFTER 3 WDM WATER IF RAN HAS NOT FALLEN WTHIN 7 DAYS. JO DAK I WASH CNEW ESN WIND AND WATER REMOVAL REDUCE MULEN AND BNMSN MY F AREA NDT FENDED fat 7 ,{ 7w10282 ANCNON If NECESSARY. DAYS r f 1e• RCP EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE AND TIME OF PLACEMENT 1 g: To BE REWOM 4 .LK..._- ,.. CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION.. „...^•' LIMIT ORANGE LUT ORANGE OW FENCE I I SEWER MANHOLE 1 ,.... � .. ......•..FRr..r .__.....FRS .. ETA....... (SAVEE TREE) ... .. .. _.... _...... ML• ... .. _.... (SAVE TREES) 403.82 399.02 ROW OF INS e as PVC I .W O /O 1 , ( y ... 1� v 1& JNT.5, /f t a t� ) ME POINT e ) II * I 'ELEV-404.J7 SU FEW I I I ( ! t 'S } I ✓ f 7EE8'/ I � � sroT,wWU l(E AREA I H } 1 II V y;.I A 1 1 I J' 9EDWW BASIN \ t -.... ... I `[ESOOS.7M 1RM 1' DEEP m BE Ro+rnEn r fr H Dec GRc .. T f •: L /f SILT FENCE mm CONSTRUCTION LIMIT ORANGE SNOW FENCE -TCE PUNT 4 ELEV-384.02 SILT 19ENCIE WITH LONT SNOW FENCE ____ _____ _ STING GRA .. .." � E10 lEl. -t.• f .. .._ ....... .... ./.Hr�. _ _ _ ..._____ _.. DRIVE TO BBEACCE�RE14OVED I } , / DRIVENG GRAVEL / UTILITY POLE TO — ".-... i ..�....... ..... ... 12 (71P CRAVfI. DRIVE (70 BE ROM BE RELOCATED 3RG, IwJ86.91 TCE PdBT J '1T "`••\ ., ..... ... ..� -. d SILT FENCE AID. 70E ELEV 4.88 W- 8' WATE MAIN : f^--+ '7pE� �C$7pO TOE PdNT 2 t I li.... ... V0V SrAmum \ I ELEV-388.27 Grq*ltC SC/Le I ( I Ir ELEIAN39908 ,af�'�, EN7RAINE F 20 0 20 40 60 80 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 BWf PRIE Rawl P.O. BE. 308 (B2)879693lW ne) wilbBGE1. YeTInent 05" (BOZ 879'00508W VM lh-be Web at WWW.TnIddlC-.ftng.OGEII CONQPNAL APPROVAL SIWM6310N PRTLMWARY APPROVAL SElM690N FINAL APPROVAL SIlOM[S90N CONSnUCTION EWAW wlmVl� liu rrot H cwawa McWNA �.Im om baM w w x. a..NR. www.N w. aw.walla, w. NH.�� la a a..N N ww:aUNa IOC# II wrap en a7 m lRaomA.�caany � w: oI m.n Tea�.mRF ate. clo�a. EIPMie°a°r°al a: aatl a¢y'A a.a��, N ma (IHMd THE raH..FA aPPra..A aNw wN� ISM I w..w . ,.,Pww.T1x b wNw. mN wP, HaH. m. e4. B B • ' e s w IS ` r WB F It L B B Project Location REVISE REAR ENTRY 71VIV7 .AVM CITY STAFF COMMENTS 1,1/b7 mm No. DIex31P11a1 Dale 8y Rev4lOfle c`y?�,,N WA�srr�i # NOCML3� �R Project Tlft East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT Sheet ride DEMOLITION & EROSION CONTROL PLAN Drawing Ntanl— 2006090-52 ExOPAWWn: I PTo)ec -anaser: ,AVM DIhME1: AAL Dde: I2/0B/2UU6 F.B. GO0 Scale: I' - 20' pInjertreNrenae: xxx x4tef: 2006090dc Bench FBI: xxx App-Med SP2 f� C NOTES• STANE ONLY N EXTREMELY W� MNDY CONDI BONS AS APPRDWD BY LANDSCAPE ARCNTECT D� • IF KNDw PLANT B -Ul BARKED TREES NW j SAME SUN OR ORENTAMXI OR a MRAP Mm PYEDNE KREN POL.IA -W� • BURLAP: IA� �W ,.R1 W� M� LOOSEN. CUT, R REMOVE NATURALOOSEN FROM TOP BAU TM 1 OE ROOT BALL REMOVE SYNMEBC BURLAP �� MWE• WT S dlAWAYWAY BOTTOM RINGS. EMBATHEN R REMOVEOVE REMA—NNG MRE. • I r TREE TO EXPOSE ROOT RARE, MAIN ORDER RDOT, AND N SAME ORIENTABON AS TREE WAS GROBM DO NOT PUNT TOO DEEP J' LATER SHREDDED BARK MULCH (TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCINTECn OVEN PERMEABLE 1• CLEARANCE � NEW fA lt. W-bb2LELACELrieOjJyi MFXt TL1 IRET TRNNK — �4' SAUCER NM ID= —ID — — BACKFlLL MTH EXCAVATED MATERIAL. If PLANT MJx SOIL IS PREDOMNATELY BALL MA. ttAY OR GRAVEL (ENLARGE PLANT PIT MOTH N PARKING NCORPORATE ISLANDS ID FILL ENBNE ISLAND) p [�TTEED MxmA, AS AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE �1 TREE PLANTING DETAIL MLwI Ecr —_- 1Proa1 L-,Roo:e �q(� aD� •w_ J' LAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCH ,Aa Ur' m (TO W APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCNITEc» OVER PERMEABLF KEED FABRIC NOT PLACE TD 09 0 B DO CLOSE MAIN STEM. J' SAUCER RW L LAohF MTN EXCAVATED BIO� MATERIAL N" SOL IS NATELY CLAY OR GRAVEL WORP OR END MATERIAL �— AS ECIED APP LA DIRECTED AND APPROVID By LANDSCAPE AWCMIECT PLANT PIT MDTH 3X NOTES BAIL DM. •PLMT SNBUS AT SANE DEPTH AI MRCH SHRUB HAD PBEMOUSLY CROMR NOOSEN, co. B REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 Of ROOT BALL 'SHREDDED BARK MULCH AND M:ED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE COI1- -vws KNEN USED N SEOS BALL AND BURLAP SHRUB ,•�E �t �ap9A,Mp ENaaKLR: u„ rK.,>TP IPm� L-,Rea„ _ -. KEY SCIENT6K: NAME COMMON NAME DUML. 512E COMMENTS AF —Re —N AUNmn BMpe MapM 4 21f1-3' B&B NAumn Blew AS A--h— Sager Mlge 4 2•-21? B&B FO FwayMM— EMN F—AW 15 2.s CANE. GTI G ftmlrMceMhop Inww Hh-ytp h B 210 B&B ..Pder JCSV Jung«Me Ch Haw SMg-GramJ.4- 74 3gM. COM. 'SMgeMi ptr - LI Lg,mh—eolum a P— 25 39a1. cow MA N%ka Prake&a' Prakake c.W'le 2 15 gal. BAB PA phae. Me Norway STXUCR 6 6'-T B&B PNM Ph. m Q0 mlphea Dwell law Phe 2 - 24- CONT. PCC Prunes Car AN. a1— Purple L Sandch q 11 5 gel. CONE. PC Pyres C-Ww / 0 BMze Glary 5 21?-P Bde 'ANumn N. Pear OR Ouamua rube Red Oak B 212 -r B&B RPJM Rhododrwltl—PJM PJM Rhodads — 1R Sgel. CONT- SJ $Dreams— Gdd Mound Sprea 16 3gM. co - cm hb $PV $phase YMlhgueei Vhh—Sprea 31 3gel. CONT. SP SO% Deus Mss Kim N4nchudan 2 30'-36' B&B 'Nba Kim' LNac THE Tens made Evarlow Yaw 29 15--24' cow. -Eaarkrw' TON Th* accidental. ogre OaM Nnerk:an Arhmvtlae 34 4'-5- 8.8 DWMnIIOn B.— CA ClelhmahlK SummesweaLc— 33 30 CONT. CAS came— $iddan D.,— SO 3gal. CONT. Sekcd N Sex .srgcRMa Common wince ' 13 2gai. cow, SAC SemUuaus Taretlwlais AmwKan EMar 20 30M. cow. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) 478 N* Pa61 Rd P.O. Bar 308 MM) 9796331(phale) NI®b1PIL VamwR 05495 MW 879.006OP4 VbB Us On Ole Web aO-N.TnKkACmmulW& m 'CDNf7PTWl APROVAL S1loMR90t/ P57LINI ASY A OVAL AMAYSMON fWAL A Cffl L SYM69DN CONSTSUCTION D WDAb ��aaadipol�iwi ra. NrMinMw wmo.�(aa. Y and ��a.a.e a�� va aam�huc�bw+ b roa.e:vi�e �Wi.. � tar Pater Ir �epaaMl elo awroaaW nprq+�r ; Me R�I�erea In. tiow.Mx t�lmi (ni/�) n�aa�rn+••W m�aa�. be.kpr me aePMa away I, madajy w Gplara'poty. Lwmpn ro M• ✓a•++P ftoject Lowdon ® UPDATE REAR BLDG B PUNTS 5/11/b7 JMM 0 RELOCAIE TRANSFORMER 1/2/107 JMM CITY STAFF COMMENTS 1/2/O1 JMM W. DtlalpllOn Due By P—bleha * N%76 7VL LN.7NSCC \� Project 718E East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT Shxt 7We LANDSCAPE PLAN Dravft bFSnbv 2006090-53 ExtcnlM : I Date: 12/08/2" F.B. 000 Scale: 1' � 20' RO)ect 1e(e1ence: XXX X-Pd: 2006090,1, BmdL File: XXx SP3 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.O.Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.tRAeliconsulting.com To: Vol Bekcr- ZDriv%c G,�l 0J - 5• �Ur�iV�q�U� WE ARE SENDING YOU: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: Proj. No.: 40C) (� Attention: Q Re: Iwo Vk- X I Attached - — 1 Under separate cover via j US MAIL ' the following items: _-- 1 Shop -—�—� I drawings ---i Prints X Plans ( — j Samples Specifications --- — -- — - Copy of letter ! Change order THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: _ For approval _Approved as submitted - Resubmit _copies for approval __ For your information _ Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution X As requested _ _ Returned for corrections — �- Return corrected prints j — ! For review and comment-- - _ - _- 3 For bids due ; Printed returned after loan to us REMARKS: p �� lS •�Q WL 'av- �ohd ld e +Le o n at��5� avu� i 1 VA rt' h�. La�.dsc�e s�.�u COPY TO: File SIGNED: L, Document2 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY GiJER"N'S OFFICE F 200 t .��I'til Recordod in C!.7ZG1l 1;;�;,,. .� ,f ". tlittgtan Lail Re.• r A test: Derma S. Rinvilla, City Clark 1100 HINESBURG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 NOTICE OF CONDITIONS TO PROVIDE AN ACCESS EASEMENT TO AD JOINERS PROPERTY OWNER/DEVELOPER: East Mountain View, LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1100 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT NAME OF PROJECT: Medical Office Building East Mountain View, LLC ("Applicant")eingat approvals by the City of South Burlington Development Review Board dated Januar7 #SD-06-105 and #SD-06-106 to construct a 24,400 sq. ft. 2-story medical office buil1100 Hinesburg Road, located in the City of South Burlington ("Applicant's Property"), as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan, East Mountain View, 1.100 linesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers dated 12/8/06 last revised 1/22/07. The South Burlington Development Review Board granted said approvals subject to certain conditions as follows: Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall record a Notice of Conditions approved by the City Attorney which requires the applicant to provide an access easement deed to the property owner(s) abutting property to the south and east for ingress and egress over the access easement shown on the approved plat upon approval of a development plan on the abutting property by the Development Review Board. The Applicant hereby gives notice that the lands shown on the above -referenced plan are subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon Applicant's Property, unless and until modified or removed by the South Burlington Development Review Board or its successor: 1. Applicant agrees to grant to the owner of the property abutting Applicant's Property immediately to the South an easement for mutual access, to facilitate the construction of a driveway and pedestrian connection between the two properties. Applicant agrees to construct those improvements on its property which are necessary to accommodate said access. 2. Appli� .nt's obligation to grant an access eas ment as described in Paragraph i above shall be conditioned upon the following: a. The owner of the property abutting Applicant's Property immediately to the South must grant Applicant reciprocal rights of access across the property abutting Applicant's Property immediately to the South. b. The owner of the property abutting Applicant's Property immediately to the South shall improve such property necessary to accommodate said shared access, as determined by the South Burlington Development Review Board. C. The owner of the property abutting Applicant's Property immediately to the South must execute a Shared Access Agreement with the Applicant addressing the parties' pro-rata responsibilities for use and maintenance of the access easement. 3. This Notice of Condition shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the property or any interest. in the property. 4. This Notice of Condition shall be binding upon the Applicant and the Applicant's successors and assigns. Executed by the property owner/developer on the date hereinafter written. ? Date Date STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. LOW View, LLC Ra-pd Lafsony), its duly authorized and member By: Dina T. Dowhan, its duly authorized agent and member At South Burlington, in said County, this � a day of _.._fld, 2007, Rand Larson, duly authorized agent and member of East Mountain View, LLC, personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument, by hinmlter sealed and subscribed, to he his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of :said East Mountain View,1.LC Befora hne, Nopry Public, Commission Expires 2!10/11 STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF FR.ANI:LIN, SS. At St. Albans, in said County, this day of , 2007, Dina T. Dowhan, duly authorized agent and member of East Mountain View, LLC, personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free aGt atd deed and the free act and deed of said East Mountain View, LLC. Before Fte, Alt. .n�P u �,. it v "Notary Public, Commission xE pires 2/10/11 ;F:Tast Mountain View, LLC\Notice of conditions Final.wpd 2END OF DOCUMEn"NT (7 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) May 22, 2007 Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Ray: tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com On behalf of East Mountain View, LLC, we are submitting an application for a Zoning Permit for the 1100 Hinesburg Road Project. The following items have been completed, per Conditions of approval dated January 4, 2007: • Digital copy of final plat plan has been submitted Notice of Conditions & Access Agreement have been recorded • Landscape Bond has been posted • Mylar copy of plat has been recorded To complete the submittal requirements set forth in the Conditions, the following items are enclosed: • Fee check for the Road Impact Fee ($12,065.06), • Fire Impact Fee ($2,997.05), • Zoning Pemut ($3,652.00), • Wastewater Allocation ($4,497.60), and • Wastewater Connection ($35.00). I have also enclosed an application for final wastewater allocation, as well as the wastewater connection application. This should complete the requirements and enable East Mountain View to receive their Zoning Permit. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSUL G ENGINEERS Abigail Li us Encl. Zoning Permit Application + Fee Check Wastewater Allocation Application + Fee Check Wastewater Connection Application + Fee Check Impact Fees — Road & Fire cc. Rand Lzrson, Steve Connor P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.O.Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsulting.com To: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington LETTER OF T MSNMAL Date: 6/8/2007 Proj. No.: 2006090 Attention: Ray Re: East Mountain View Copies Date No. Description 1 Landscape Bond Certificate 1 Performance Bond — AIA Document A 312 1 Payment Bond THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: REMARKS: Landscape Bond for East Mountain View (1100 Hinesburg Road) is enclosed. COPY TO: File 4 SIGNED: 01�4 L If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at one . 06090BelairT03.doc January 25, 2007 Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Ray: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsulting.com Enclosed is a copy of the Site Plan for the East Mountain View project that has been revised to comply with the conditions of approval for the project dated 1 /4/2007. Major changes from the previous version include the addition of a shared water main to be located along the southern property boundary and a fire hydrant per request by fire chief. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CON ULTING ENGINEERS Abigail isius Encl. Site Plan cc. Rand Larson Doug Brent Steve Connor Joe Green 06090BelairL03.doc P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting ,e 1100 HINESBURG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 NOTICE OF CONDITIONS TO PROVIDE AN ACCESS EASEMENT TO ADJOINERS PROPERTY OWNER/DEVELOPER: East Mountain View, LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1100 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT NAME OF PROJECT: Medical Office Building The aforementioned property owner/developer of the above -referenced property/project hereby acknowledges and gives acceptable notice of conditions of the approval of the project by the City of South Burlington Development Review Board dated January 2, 2007 #SD-06-105 and #SD-06-106, e.g. condition #17, as follows: Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall record a Notice of Conditions approved by the City Attorney which requires the applicant to provide an access easement deed to the property owner(s) abutting property to the south and east for ingress and egress over the access easement shown on the approved plat upon approval of a development plan on the abutting property by the Development Review Board. The conditions upon which the owner/developer shall provide a nonexclusive thirty foot (30') wide by two hundred foot (200') long access easement along the southern boundary beginning at VT 116 to the property owner(s) abutting property to the south and east for ingress and egress over the access easement shown on the approved plat are as follows: 1. Access to the benefitted parcel immediately to the south of 1100 Hinesburg Road shall be to no more than a three (3) acre commercial parcel of land containing a one (1) or a two (2) building office complex. 2. At th -time of convey e of the access easement t e antee, the grantee, its successors d assigns, agree to bear one-half (1/2) of the ost o construction of this two hundred f t (200') long access road, the fire hydrant, e uti . pole relocation, the eight inch (8") ater main, the City fees for tap, water ho -up, Ci use and service fees, annual o erating and maintenance fees, includin but not limited to, snow rem al, cleaning, salting and road resurfacing, etc. access ad repair, maintenan and upkeep ost allocation shal f' be based on the use establis ed by the pro rata air roved daily ve cle trip ends for oth projects (based on the Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition x weekday total ly trips vers gross floor ar a for all approved't�Ses on the respectiv Vroperties). 3. The l�enejitted parck imm tely to the south of 11100 Hinesburg Road does not generate in excess of thirty-ffi P.M. peak hour trip ends according to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition. IF 4. If required by prove e a twelve foot fire *drant to the owe iq' ` ed by the grant( ent to the grE /developer's app ie owner/developer, the gr tee immediat to the south shall 2') by fifteen foot' (15) ea ent for water main serving /developer in a'location s wn on tl�e approv d plan. hi , if the owner/developer shall provide ten foot (10') wid�waterhne se, its successors and signs,/ in a loc 'on sb&n on the 5. Relative to lands to the east of lands of the owner/developer owned by or controlled by Munson,rtTi ving Corporation, its successors and/or assigns, the o ' er/developer sh�l -' obligated provide the thirty foot (309-w de-bw two hundred foo (200') long access easement fo emergency purposes only, including but 11ed to health -,and fire safety, police Prot tion and ambulance services. This access must be restricted by a gate or other suitable me In Witness Whereof, the property owner/developer has set its hand and seal this day of February, 2007. Respectfully submitted, East Mountain View, LLC Rand Larson, its duly authorized agent and member Approved and accepted as written this day of February, 2007. go F:\Sta_40\East Mountain View, LLC\Notice of conditions #2.wpd 2 Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C. City of South Burlington City Attorney (printed name) I TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.O.Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com To Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 LETTER OF TRANSNMAL Date: 1 /31 /07 Proj. No.: 2006090 Attention: Ray Re: East Mountain View- Landscape Plan WE ARE SENDING YOU: ................................_._....._..._..._...._...__........_................_.._........__....._......__......................_............._.....__.....___....................._........_......_..__................_............_....................._..__..._.._...................__.._ ........ X Attached _ _ T Under separate cover via US MAIL 1 the following items: -. .... ..... ... ....._.A. 1 ...... ...__.._._..-. ............... i E.... Shop.............._........._................_...._........._........_._...................._..........__.:......_........_.............................___._................................_........_...........1..........._.......__........_......_..__............._........._.........__._......�......._...................._............ ......... .................... ................... ..................................... _.......... I Prints X i Plans Samples j Specifications I of letter f ; Change order Copies Date No. Description 3 SP3- Landscape Plan THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: COPY TO: File 06090Bela irT0l.doc Resubmit copies for approval ........ ... ---- Submit copies for distribution ............... .................. .... _.............. Return corrected Drints Printed returned after loan to us SIGNED: y, J If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 30' PSWANENT RIGHT OF WAY do ACCESS EASEMENT TO PROPERTY TO SOUTH ONLY 194.17' — ►} -- 15' O 4 O ct GRA VEL DRIVE V S82'20'59 1- 30' PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY & ACCESS EASEMENT TO PROPERTY TO SOUTH ONLY �--. ,����uOF unn►rnrrii��i, �P scorn y� D. TAYLOR y* NO. 488ZZ NO. 5 UP 0.2 Boundary Plat EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 111r TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS `TCE) 478 Blair Paris Road P. O. Box 308 WMstom Vermont 05495 (802) 8 %4= I Drav 4 nff,bw 2006090-40 >rxt 1 Project nw. JAM Drawn AFC I Date 08128106 scaje 1 "=20' mw Book 243 DL%k XX Approved TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.O.Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsultiing.com To Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 LETMR OF TRANSAUUAL Date: 5/8/07 Proj. No.: 2006090 Attention: Ray Re: East Mountain View- Digital Survey Plat WE ARE SENDING YOU: :....................... .... ............................................. .... ............... .......................................... ....._......_......................... ...................... --.__................. _....................... .... ..... _.__._.._.r........... ... ............. .......... ................. ....... _........ _..... _........ ...... ..... ,................ .._...._..................... ................... ...... ......... __.._....................... .._...... W....... __.._.............. X Attached j I Under separate cover via US MAIL ; the following items: ._......._......................_..............._......_...... ....... _. ..... _...... .... ,.......................... ..................... ..._........... ,................................ .... _...... ...._... _._.......................... .................. .._............. ................... ......................... ....... _......... ................... _........ ........................... _.................................................... ......................... ..... .. . Shop Prints Plans j Samples I Specifications i of letter j ! Change order ! X i Diskette Copies Date No. Description 1 Disk — 3.5" — East Mountain View digital plat THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: a.._For approval..................................................._............................................................._.................s....Approved as submitted I Resubmit copies for approval ........................_ For your information Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution ....................................................................... ....... .............. .............................. _ ....... ............ . ............. X As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints...................................r.......... ..........._ For review and comment ............... ;..... .................__............... ................. ...................... ..... ............. ................. ..... .......... .............. x........................... ... ............. .... ..... ......... ........ ................. ......... ........... ....... _.... _........... .............. _.............. ................_......_.._............._........__..._.................... For bids due Printed returned after loan to us ........................ ..... .............................. ........................ .......... _... ......... -- REMARKS: Per Conditions of Approval, enclosed is a disk containing a digital copy of the final Survey Plat for the 1100 Hinesburg Road project, known as East Mountain View. Please contact our office if there are any problems with the file. COPY TO: File 06090BelairT02.doc SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 NOTICE: DRAFT STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER: 5042-INDS PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: April 11, 2007 — May 11, 2007 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: East Mountain View, LLC PERMITTEE ADDRESS: 5399 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 PERMIT NUMBER: 5042-INDS DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary RECEIVING WATER: Unnamed tributary of Potash Brook EXPIRATION DATE: Five years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft discharge permit proposed for issuance to East Mountain View, LLC for the discharge of stormwater runoff from an office building, associated drives and parking, located on Hinesburg Road in South Burlington, Vermont to an unnamed tributary of Potash Brook. The means of treatment includes a micropool extended detention pond (P-1) and a dry swale (0-1). N -2- TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS Tentative determinations regarding effluent limitations and other conditions to be imposed on the pending Vermont permit have been made by the State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (VANR). The limitations imposed will assure that the Vermont Water Quality Standards and applicable provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, PL 92-500, as amended, will be met. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application, proposed permit, and other information are on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies, obtained by calling (802) 241-3770, will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) May 11, 2007 to the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Comments may also be faxed to 802-241- 3287. The permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the 'first page of any submitted comments. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public hearing to consider the proposed permit. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a hearing is warranted. A hearing will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such hearing) in holding such a hearing. RIGHTS TO APPEAL TO ENVIRONMENTAL COURT At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny the permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontiudiciga.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660). Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Impact Fee Calculation for New Non -Residential Construction A Project Name f 44vt 1 / — �A B Effective Date C Type of use Gic B D Type of construction E Value of construction per square foot from Appendix 1 G v V F Total square feet of new construction a T G Total value of new construction �— E x F H Above in units of$1,000 / `t � G / 1000 I Existing land value ` T� 5'�o Grand list J Above in units of$1,000 �. ?j I / 1000 K Total value of site and improvements after construction G + I L Above in units of$1,000 0 5/ 3 K / 1000 ROAD IMPACT FEE M Base road impact fee per VTE N Estimated PM peak hour VTEs O Base road impact fee P Credit per $1,000 (Table RD-5) for past payments Q Credit for past payments R Credit per $1,000 (Table RD-6) for future payments S Credit for future payments T Total road impact fee FIRE PROTECTION FEE $144.56 6 S r /, 41.7 M x N / d4::5) JxP ,U —r .Q% I L x R O-Q-S Estimated post construction value of structure and contents _ ��"" U in units of $1,000 `t SJ H x 1.875 V Base fire protection impact fee ��, t7 $0.87 x U Credit per $1,000 of land value (J) for past tax payments / W (Table FP4) (' From FP-4 X Total credit applicable to project for past tax payments 7y �� / W x J Post -construction value of structure and land excluding Y contents G + I Z Above in units of $1,000 �+� ` Y / 1,000 Credit per $1,000 of post -construction value for future tax ' AA pmts (Table FP-5) V From FP4 AB Total credit applicable to project for future tax payments C> AA x Z AC Total fire protection impact fee `% j` V - X - AB TOTAL ROAD AND FIRE IMPACT FEE o .i Calculation sheets.xls CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORS [:T STREET SOUJA I BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101. January 5, 2007 Jeremy Matosky, PE Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Bensen: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on January 2, 2007 (effective 1/4/07). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 180 days (must be submitted & recorded by July 3 20071 of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, "'vDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7005 3110 0004 4484 7705 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: i / 2. /D " MAILING ADDRESS giut�1►t Po '1� Ox 1!308 IBC)Kt-Pe--jUe-r- o /04�a� P r , J u '`o ca. PRn.1Fr.T nP IKIT=o[:c,- V �C$S A 4, �02 J CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working. days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: , K o NAME MAILING AnnRF-q-q DDn IC!'T plc IKMETM�c+'r �eer� �Olp ivy M 'A-"� n-e�.x 3 �SSc X G i A11rcUkKo—WJa— J I , r w1� ,(� r�� J50® tD&rs - �f n p � � i �i.+.t.�✓��I % �I� i.C. A"L1A.�Kv- ,,.}�. �, yam+ �yj/� p {]� a �'n $S� 13bp P-%Jk 1,te_ so �)'941 V T-- �574,0 (J , S, A7�E 2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 5, 2007 Joe Greene, AIA Joseph Architects 25 Cross Road Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Greene: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 5, 2007 Rand Larson 5399 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Larson: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, e�&AQaM* Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 5, 2007 Stephen Connor 1100 US Route 2 Berlin, VT 05602 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Connor: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, oz�c"�) Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department ,.P, SOUTH BLrtLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REV.,., BOARD 2 JANUARY 2007 Mr. Yandow also asked about a fence to control pedestrian traffic. Mr. Dinklage suggested Mr. Yandow and neighbors meet with the developer, and if there is no agreement, it can be discussed at final plat. Another neighbor expressed concern that excavation would damage the roots of a large tree on his property and cause it to fall on his home. Mr. Dinklage suggested having the City Arborist look at this. Mr. Henderson -King said they are working with the Arborist and will bring it to his attention. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-06-97 of Nate Hayward subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Behr seconded. Motion passed 6-0. Mr. Knudsen rejoined the Board. 05.Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-06-105 and Final Plat Application #SD-06-106 of East Mountain View, LLC, for a planned unit development consisting of a 24,400 sq. ft. 2-story medical office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Matosky located the property opposite Fox Run Lane. He indicated that they had made changes based on staff comments. They are proposing a 30-foot access easement on the southwest corner for shared access potential. They also now show a Rec Path easement. Mr. Belair noted that parking spaces have been reduced by one from 107 to 106. He asked about the dumpster location. Mr. Matosky said they will stripe it so it won't be used. He advised that they had also added a handicapped space. Mr. Belair said staff is OK with the 13.1% parking waiver (stipulation 3F of the approval motion will be deleted to this affect). Mr. Matosky then addressed the height waiver and showed building elevations. The front of the building will be 29 ft. The back of the building will be higher. Members were OK with the height waiver. Mr. Belair noted there is also a setback waiver of 7 feet for the drop-off area. He stressed that this cannot be converted to an enclosed space. The applicant expressed concern with the shared access becoming a major thoroughfare. Mr. Dinklage assured him this will not happen. Mr. Plumeau cited the 85 trip ends for this development along with other trip ends from approved projects and expressed concern with the high speeds in the area and other traffic -3- A SOUTH BL t1LINGTON DEVELOPMENT REV-, W BOARD 2 JANUARY 2007 concerns. He asked what would be the trigger for looking at these problems. He felt that trip ends are continually being added to an already dangerous corridor. Mr. Belair said Hinesburg Rd. is totally controlled by the State, and they will have to decide what is appropriate. Mr. Knudsen said there is no indication in the approval motion that a sign permit is needed. Mr. Matosky said their "sign" will be a rock with the address on it. He asked if that is OK. Mr. Belair said that under a certain size, it is OK. The approval motion was amended to delete stipulation 3F, to add a 8.3 foot height waiver, and to add stipulation #21 regarding signage approval. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-06-105 and Final Plat Application #SD-06-106 of East Mountain View, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-104 of Bill Daley to subdivide an 11.59 acre lot into six lots ranging in size from 0.84 acres to 6.2 acres, 1500 Dorset St: Mr. Gallo noted that the regulations prohibit ore than 3 residences on a private drive, but a through road is not possible. They are proposing two parallel roads because of this. Regarding wetland impact, Mr. Gallo said they can move the southernmost road further down and cross the wetland there. He said the two drives appear to be allowable under the regulations. Mr. Dinklage said he felt this was an inappropriate layout of lots, given the large wetland involved. Mr. Daley said he is buying this land. His main aim is to build himself a home and create a subdivision with new SEQ zoning. He noted they could put up 85 units on the land with a through road. Rather than that, he prefers a larger lot for himself and a few other lots similar to what is already there. They will reserve the 6+ acres until the state makes some "growth center" decisions. Mr. Dinklage said he thought the applicant could have a large lot for himself with only one other street to serve the other lots. That would be much better than 2 parallel roads. Mr. Daley asked about waiving the 200-foot street length. Mr. Belair said that with a PUD that can be possible. Mr. Dinklage told the applicant to look for a way to serve those lots with one street. Mr. Schmucker said the road created the wetland. Mr. Dinklage advised the applicant to get help from the city's Stormwater Superintendent. Y.oniiq Dinl 1�mionai Rery=mmania i. enalomlRegwrommh LvL/,a/ - _--- EXIS w zoN Drmat Wsa PARKINCErRvc PROPOSED-- Extstnvc PROPOSE, CORD: aaea 2.A3 ar» aFOlnwcn _ • Ian. _-.._. 3 eaa. ITensl Ne Ns PROPOSED SEWER MAINS s - -- s SEWER MANHOLE (SUN) 0 • Mu Bui W - 3p% tt.5% t1,ma MEDICAL OFFICE: 24,400 HANDICAP C SPACESIIOOOSPACES FT2 = 121 SPACES 15 AND SERVICES -- UN NEW, LLC - ACCESSIBLE. 5 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES 5 WATER MAINS M«. o .,a co a . SDu� .ea3 sFi - W---------- .SEWER cLEANcur (co) )N ROAD ♦W, From seuvcx wI 4Eft AND SERVICES __________ J MN. SNe S.m 351 351E 05495 Min Ftmr snna� apft ItSTORM DRAINAGE ___________ p __________ 0 CATCHBASIN (CB) (, IN •r,�. ewa r,a rielgm._..__ ..__xft__. a t U tD PROPANE - OUTLET OR 43 ACRES USINC EXISTING HINESBURG ROAD R.O.W. FraM vam cm a 30% 35a% 6t6 -- --^ ----- a J ��ttttyyUUUUJJ END SECTION RON ' ANRAL CAS ( ) SaD PAMi�I&mWs_ 10% 14.3% CT. 1-0, INDUSTRIAL -OPEN SPACE _ O HEAD POWER ----- ---------- tEv VALVE D° d zaxre mnwibnm AVG. WEEKDAY TRIPS 783 UNDERGROUND .. IBER: MAP 4$ PARCEL 080-01100 oeetl NA m,eaaambi unaa PrapPM PEAK HOUR TRIPS B5 TELEPHONE-^'-"----'OT''---"'- Ui _ CURB STOP (CS) 5' • Peoaiatlrp rwnranWlavz BASED ON RE TRIP L OFFICE MANUAL-77H EDITION LAND USE 40 ME- VOLUME 461, PAGE 451-452 " 1°a"'f fB�1°etl 720-MEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE BUILDING PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD - FIRE HYDRANT (HYD) 1} T SO. FL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING REQUESTED WAIGRAVEL DRIVE OR ROAD VERS CURB UTILITY POLE 2 PARKING: TB PARKING SPACES TURF) WATER & WASTEWATER 2) FRONT SETBACK: 73' OVER FUTURE FRONT SETBACK - J) BUILDING HEIGHT. 8.3' OVER BUILDING HEIGHT DESIGN FLOW - EPRs.• 15 GPD/EMPLOYEE x 53 EMPLOYEES = 795 GPD PROPERTY LINE r03.55 -) PLUS 40 PATIENTS O 10 GPD/PAT. MTC OR 7)Y�J3 (,`P6 EASEMENTS _ _ TRANSFORMER L� , L} � / - _ _ -_ - I / / WATER: LESS IOX LOW FLOW FIXTURES - 1067 GPD WASTEWATER: LESS 20X MUNICIPAL CONNECTION 956 GPD TREE LINETELEPHONEHONE PEDESTAL' i-402.82 D / t=-P �TOPOGRAPHIC 121-. ty CONTOURS LUMINAIRE e-t BUILDING SETBACKS BOLLARD LIGHT a, I $ P ) TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. (ICE) ICES CONTROL POINTSTEEL REB A. \ I I RIM-381.8 8' 9N-386.0 (YARD DRAIN) I 8" AN-38.O (ROOF) SE" 15, LOUT-3ft9 , laR (XMINEcnOW j9a. r=386.57SEWER ANHOLE '. II \ \ y9' •MICHAEL RAVELIN N ._.-3WY" �. __ a 1-380.27 BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LTD' I I r-403.82f0-12` ANHOLE i. / r \••- ROW OF PINES I 1=380.72 I I 1-399.02 I J / / �/ /� / �,-_ --- --_.. _ JOS- -_ 399.07 I I i 79Qi5 % BLOOO:RETAR00 WALL YARD DRAW PRECAST COWGRE-M:' / 20' UDUTY1EASEMENT / .ORAJN aN 1 I 1 ____.�'�'F______ / i / -5------- - 11i/-- ----� ----------- � -�------I-----^ -----'- --� PVavassNc-----`-----i--�---x-9.24! ------------ wow -------5 --r--^ ------ --- ---ram------- ` 1_ i tOPOSED ELEC. , PRECAST CONG' E10 -0 GRADE) / / I I I A / ) STORM-,*&? r 'ANSFORMER , I ,,! RETAINING WALL / � / a0.07 /{1\/_•"`�FIF4,'1 1 f I I• / // IF _- X I (HOLE I y / \? ' I i i- EXISTIN / - VC ffi ,� / / / I I f I I TCE POINT 4 / 10'x10' CONENCE DUPIP9fEJP / IV384.02 1 1 l HmRAN / ; GDEDtAtOR / f / / \ PAD WITH FpFcm ENtxGBPBeE I / I PAD / ICE POINTS �_ ELEV390.47 / SNOW S RAGE If / l�1 r _ --F- 0VUNE WATER LEVEL { CONTROL STRUCTURE ; jt ?........ - / m \ 1• / i i �` ELEV=4 .37 I l � r./3�_ /� / / / - /! 41E. 4 i,' I e 1 NIF / so,, �a�G / /� RAC �/ / i I ( � ' �'^ 's + SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE /� SIGN 'Do Nor SURFACE _ i !I / z i, ,kc•,. h ' °• r ; l _ I: _.I: _ •�:,: G OATH+YOlNTEp $Idk �. n / i I e�` / 8 ��i �� i /P SPACB.! W OF PINES\\. 294 LF.10-/2' \ I FWSH / O � lip 1 �CURB . i l z B 24.400 ft... ��--.•.. i' iiw i i i' t:l :::33 I M�cs::' CL➢PB ',Office Building ➢N- o I LO ; u � \ l :i �.':•;•.;.:µ{{ l 2 STDRY w/ `I - .9 I t�4 / u dtF _ ! 8' PN.Or t UNDERCR ND av23 Y / / \ 1 1 // 3yz3 DOLLARDamp �� 1 I:::.:23 ! w.:.. i �r�A9aN�c wA[L � ; S. ,, i •. GAS I , /./ _. :../, ......./- (/ ..�� / - I 1 / Approx; FFE= 404.0 / ( BASEMENT FL T^-:: / •1 - \\ \\ �\ t ! /! / t+.S- q - / tl_-39Zb AT MIDIFOINT li CU �I , �' / PS I :I _... _ I. OVERHEAD DOOR _.... ! It SLOPES 06*/Yr TOWARD �'. ..L , i '��/�i 11 I 1 I ; �1 �\ ` // / y, / i 11 I : / : I I / 1 %(G' \ \ / i l l l 11 \ I i'. / / C T y •,+. a C` J `•. I , R FOUNPAROM DRAW (TYP) f Y ,t I II - i d 8 PERF. PVC SOR 35DROP ANE FOR 16 If i I 5; 5 'PAD 1 1 I I ryxcCAST RONCRE7E BLL WING Tap Et.Csf�,vt.5 �. � � ' (• 'r� r: `� f : 11 II • % / PaaPasEv �� - - / / % � � � �E,� / i I i i \ ' I a , / I I / I GARAfY: DDOR , , 7ai398. \ ( GRASS CHMBIEL .ae,.' 25 4' BON y i V i ri I VAMF DRAW ffi / / u LWa➢J LIRE b h MAN ODORIOYT ---- RIMrd9 & /. THRUST n _ -_ -: _ _ .-__ � Gy . ,.� __ _ "^__-.__--_`___-- 1- � 8' C1 WATER E' p :ANT. h BLOCK �., ii : - m RELOCATE U71JTY i - ". �.`. 6y-.... "_ / ICE POINT 2 GRAVEL DRIVE D d POLE u `-.• ELEV 38.27-ICE POINT 3 $ _ _ STING 8` WATER MAIN i j1. Bs JP,P, �'ACCE'SS » - 8' VALVE - ELEV384. 8. -W ------- ----- - r-- Nr .. .. __-�, \-•.., / z 2PA"HE FASEMnEOUNTL.� /'" ` ice` , ' \fro\'Ei � RW-3B9.8 WITHI COPPER BLOOWWOFF \ \ / a SOUTH ONLY 12' W-3B6.SO ,-..- 1 - 8' IN 38B.5 I 1 t I / I i X 39t 10' EASEMENT FOR x RB�f-39f.9 `, I -- 12'x15' EASEMENT FOR TCE POINT 1 a i W 8' RN-387.$ (WARD DR 15 IOUT=3B8.45 SHARED WATER MAIN N I ELEV=399.08 SHARED WATER 12' tDUT.3B7.t5 F� DMISON 1D BENEFIT MAIN EXTENSION EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW. LLC l 3 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478Bbb Pa&Rod P.O.Bmws (B=V94 lito wmbtuq vannoet ON% melt mom VW Lb on the Web at www.ThEdeYfio .mn MRt RAial AR6 afTAti 1nt M Iwt/OY dl ..- COHCPPTUAL APPROVAL 81lON PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 9URIASI P FINAL APPROVALMJUANSION w m»iWb». utwxbq me eFYa»ro m1AWtW fieY oro not ht»eee m Mal bavN9e w amaWcfbn dmh9. 2 dowhge P.eaalad !w conaWclbn ort htendM Lo G aW F empncnm wa mntl«t doaumenre. »erlamllons, Donor/anwee< io txa Plalaac awl �� e�..m tneyaaaehw a r rougnt to he ottmaon o1 TmeeY Coneult4p fnphs» (iCFJ Ee1an .ans• er u» oI In.ee amww Ia- awwcnan a rns P»J-c h o.,w .»roamh toot (neMd nm .s.wee, aPPo»q me omaph Jn Brawny.. fie ela.hw ,now a. ammased 'rP;al.AAwaw. srn bwa,• mae toot rom- slave me loaw aPPow. J A. N.Wmenh o1 e oaPl» M I nunbhae DY aro nb PaPerty Gmyu to tl- ro••aN m y only ne meM y Ns E"O • ll b hs Wrb naymsaway fo ww ➢4a Dopy eu,loW tM m wrnnt rodwona • • a' s C s yy s ©' WIDEN ENTRANCE PER AOT IMI W A ® PER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL f/2t/b7 ' J m CITY STAFF COMMENTS 1/4v d St-Wata SNbinrttd 12/13/ab A Na Dra�tltn - Dfls 1 RNeAdo s ONAL Q�\ East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT SheetTffle Site Plan DEtwbwg Number • 2006090-51 Ldmdm • 1 Date: 12/08/2006 F.B. 000 Scale : 1' = 20' Pro)eR+rlaalts lL'IWN .Batch Ella: X PLANT LIST East Mountain View 2006090 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 1/1/07 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE COMMENTS PRICE/ PLANT* TOTAL Acer x freemanii Autumn Blaze Maple 4 21/2"-3" B&B $707.00 $2,828.00 'Autumn Blaze' Acer saccharum Sugar Maple 4 2"-21/2" B&B $517.50 $2,070.00 Forsythia ovata Early Forsythia 15 2'-3' CONT. $41.25 $618.75 Gleditsia triacanthos Imperial Honeylocust 8 21/2"-3" B&B $590.00 $4,720.00 'Imperial' Juniperus chinensis Sargent Green Juniper 74 3 gal. CONT. $44.38 $3,284.12 'Sargenti viridis' Ligustrum ibolium Ibolium Privet 28 3 gal. CONT. $47.50 $1,330.00 Malus 'Prairefire' Prairefire Crabapple 2 15 gal. B&B $302.50 $605.00 Picea abies Norway Spruce 3 6'-7' B&B $345.00 $1,035.00 Pinus mugo mughus Dwarf Mugo Pine 2 18"-24" CONT. $64.50 $129.00 Prunus cerasifera Purple Leaf Sandcherry 12 5 gal. CONT. $66.50 $798.00 x cistena Pyrus calleryana Autumn Blaze Callery 8 21/2"-3" B&B $537.50 $4,300.00 'Autumn Blaze' Pear Quercus rubra Red Oak 8 21/2"-3" B&B $675.00 $5,400.00 Rhododrendron PJM PJM Rhododendron 18 5 gal. CONT. $110.63 $1,991.34 Spiraea japonica Gold Mound Spirea 16 3 gal. CONT. $36.88 $590.08 'Gold Mound' Spiraea vanhouttei Vanhoutte Spirea 31 3 gal. CONT. $36.88 $1,143.28 Syringa patula Miss Kim Manchurian 2 30"-36" B&B $92.50 $185.00 'Miss Kim' Lilac Taxus media Everlow Yew 29 18"-24" CONT. $66.25 $1,921.25 'Everlow' Thuja occidentalis nigra Dark American Arborvitae 34 4'-5' B&B $99.38 $3,378.92 Detention Basin Clethra alnifolia Summersweet Clethra 33 3 gal. CONT. $41.50 $1,369.50 Cornus alba Sibirian Dogwood 80 3 gal. CONT. $38.75 $3,100.00 'Sibirica' Ilex verticillata Common Winterberry 13 2 gal. CONT. $41.25 $536.25 Sambucus canadensis American Elder 20 3 gal. CONT. $47.50 $950.00 TOTAL $42,283.49 * The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 February 7, 2007 Rand Larson VT Eye Laser 5399 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: DRB Minutes Dear Mr. Larson: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved minutes from the January 2, 2007 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, -&N k��ma Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. t 1 State of Vermont �. WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 1, Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective January 1, 2005 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective April 25, 2005 Case Number: WW-4-0129-1 PIN: EJ07-0033 Landowner: East Mountain View, LLC 5399 Williston Road Williston VT 05495 This pen -nit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID #0860-01100 and referenced in deeds recorded in cook 754 Page 53 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of amending Permit #WW-4-0129 to change the use of the building to house a medical office building with a daily occupancy of 53 employees with 40 patients located on Hinesburg Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions: GENERAL 1. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans and/or documents prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. listed as follows: Sheet SP1 "Site Plan" dated 12/08/2006 and "Boundary Plat East Mountain View" dated 8/28/06. 2. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans in a manrier that would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location, or, the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 2. This permit does not relieve the permittee :from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Supply Division — telephone (802) 241- 3400, Water Quality Division — telephone (802) 241-3770, the Department Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety— telephone (802) 879-2300, the Department of Health — telephone (802) 863-7221, and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 3. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 4. This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the municipal approval expires and the municipality files a written request with the Secretary, the Secretary will remove the sewage allocation for this project from the list of committed reserve capacity. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval and does not request that the Secretary remove the sewage allocation for this project from the list of committed reserve. Once the project is removed from the list of committed reserve capacity, a new pen -nit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-0129-1 East Mountain View, LLC Page 2 be required. The riles in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. 5. This project has been reviewed and approved for the existing building on the lot. All conditions set forth in Permit #WW-4-0129 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. 6. By acceptance of this permit, the pennittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vennont environmental and health statutes and regulations. 7. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction, and upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local officials. In issuing this permit, the Division has relied solely upon the licensed designers certification that the design -related information submitted was true and correct, and complies with the Vermont Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules and the Vermont Water Supply Rules. This pen -nit may be revoked if it is determined that the project does not comply with these rules. WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL: 8. This pen -nit issued by the Secretary is valid for a substantially completed potable water supply and wastewater system based upon a certification from a designer that states: "I hereby certify that the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the potable water supply and wastewater system were installed in accordance with the permitted design." 9. This project is approved for connection to the City municipal water system for a maximum of 1,067 gallons of water per day and wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 956 gallons of wastewater per day as depicted on the approved plans. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no changes to the water supply or wastewater collection system without prior review and approval. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on February 2, 2007. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department off Environmental Conservation By Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer C For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety Drawing Index Boundary Plat EC] Existing Conditions Plan SPl Site Plan SP2 Erosion Control Plan SP3 Landscape Plan SP4 Lighting Plan DI Site Details D2 Stormwater & Erosion Control Details D3 Utility Details D4 Erosion Control Details q�TKUXXU COMU LTOdG ENGO&M (TCE "Mr—MM AM s A= rot TM Myron OR CMCUTUAL KAM MUImIMmy MANE TMAL NAM CONURUMM C"V MM We U AMIUr� i uw[ "Mirrw Lmffuvmml Mo moT Project EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW UOO HK58lRG ROAD SOUTH B RL94WOK VERMONT Applicant: EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC S"9 WRlISTON ROAD WRUSTOK VERMONT (sot) *a -I s Contractor: CONNOR CONTRACTING m ROUT[ 2 NRLM. VERMONT (W4 223-3843 Architect: JOSEPH ARCHITECTS, LLC 2S CROSS ROAD WATERDURY. VE91AOW (SW 244-SUO Engineer: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. BOX W& 478 /LAR PARK ROAD. VMuSTOK VT 05495 TCE MO)ECT NO: 2WWW &A. 7a WAw1W3\Z,W%%Z,6n+0-f)4" vz.zw> ax,xs .� csi GRAM OMW I FOX RUN LANE NO PLAT IS BASED ON 7W FCUA MR,t 1) GEIDS AfSEAROED N RE CRY Or 9011M GAUlwllw LAW RECO Di * A CLOSED FELD 7RAVERSE CODUC7ED WIN A TOTAL STAM W 6/L^ BEARNOS ARE BASED ON GRID NORM 3) REMRS SET ARE N0. 5 REIFONONO ORS ■N ALUMRRI CAPS STALM 9RUOEIL C"X7NG DMEM IS 46r. PARCEL WAS OONVEM 7O EAST MONTAN WM 240MLLOW 754 PAGE 5S SEE ALSO PUT 51OIS7ANCE5 AR[ ACCIRA7E 7O ME NEAREST 005' AM AIIE 9i0RN ID t1E HufIL1EO7H Dr A FOOT FOR MAN M WAL CLOSIARE PURPO= OILY. BEA MM ARE AC"IAP47E ID THE NEAREST 10 SECONDS AND ARE SW W TO THE 9EDOD FOR MAMEIIIAMM CLOSIRE PURPOSES MY. G) AN ATR9PT HAS BEd MADE TO WrIFY OR OELVEAM m ♦'xI• COVCREIE MQVUMENT rzusH PLAT REFERENCES 1. IEADOKAID BUSNE'SS PARK I■ESKM ROAD 9WM smviva , 1T, Si16ON m PLAr w1ED 4 7 er Da CFRCE AND RECOmED INIE SWIM LAW RECCOM N MAP AIDE 300 2. 'OtEEN ACRES FAM7RIAL PARK NNE911GRO ROAD SRIUM BLN FMM Yr, PUT W SLR DATED 613104 BY MIS OPF'MF AND RECORDED N TIE SOON BMAMM LAW MOM N MAP SOLE 277. 3 VIAILM M MUM E5 LWIED PARDERSW. 1020 F■ESs(IRO ROAOL SOUiII s1A1l14O1014 VT M7FD B/721I3 BY Z OFi7CE AW RECORDED N TIE SOU7H MA9N07Oi LAW RECORDS N MAP SLIDE 21K 4. 7uT OF VAr". MALDOM 1■!AW PRORORM "MMURO RWA SCUM B(ABR om n DARED 9 BY OVUM RQBDISIFML LSL AND RECORDED N WE SWM BIRC/40RN LAW RECOmS N MAP SIDE .TB.L M. GRAVEL/! K671 p.641 9WM 91,11VUN070N Cm CLERKS OFFICE RECOVED FOR RECM AD 200__ at _ O'ddck mtiutea _ m t o mw*d be MW Swe Attut city Clrk EAST MONTAN WM LL.0 K754 pp5J 244 Al L£(ETD $ REBAR ( SET ) ■ CQNClKTE MONUMENT ( -- ) O R OROWC BAR ( FO O ) O STONE MONUMENT (FOIINO ) Graphic Scale Feet 20 O 20 40 60 60 1' ,CONCRETE MQNIIMENT UP OW BIARLN07ON PRG'ERIE3 LID K514 P.2 2 L'x5' CONCR[IE MONUMENT UP SLMN" ICE .RWT V EIMI RE KJs7 p.439 —NO. 5 w 01 RECEIVED DEC 1 12W6 City of Soe Burfingto,: � �I k � Boundary Plat soT EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW TA OR ` * NO488 * 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 4Ma0tpl04 R••I+a• �J— +� D•t• •� 1�TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 Mtk h'k Read F. Q Rea SOR Wire\ Vw OOHS (802) 87"M D..%. .*. 10060 40 , I F Ow -w. ..WM DM_ AFC Data O 1281- S,.k Ntla a0at 243 pt XX AOt>—d -- ----- --- tat MAI --- -- ---'------------------- —'-- - - /____ - - - - - - ------ -;------- - - --- - - - - - - - - - -------- OUTE 116 - 1VaSBURG ROAD ¢ g --______ ____ __♦p____________ EJOSINC fY WATER NAND '"-__'o`___ _ j Nil let ,k i A t , n iyyy. a \ u �mTyT ao s � 4 a _ � �artwwow oaw t...... I � ' R �r 6 y�N I � I t >a � i At k.� O O � � O '�R6A� � �, ,'lil o ❑ JJ " Q • 8 V i. o O �� pp r 1 � s \_rtt pNVlxft\2046�090\2006090-sLe•p 1/x/2001 31®�5 xn 11T `� rt Naanwuuu�� p� pa * 9rb4y a' fill, 4.. r tp Jp ` EEEE� 4 ti asa gg b# 09- aiR Wbil I,, fig 11WG 6 z N '1b1� Se11, 16@1 p£ 1 111 1 0j 0 7 90 m ION g •'R811 1 Vie -4 4 �a ` N a LA I i \ — — — — — — — — — — — — I r+: RgS -----.,----------------�------- i i i Z ----[ , . , -- ! 1 I i m$Y II b� Zi 4 I FO A— n RI.— A— z ... ­. F.rzythia ovate sugar Maple Early F.ny— a 15 2•-21- 2'3' ... CONT GTI Gleddsia lrlacanlh.s Yn varier In Denial Honeyl.cust B 2112"-3" BBB JCSV Juniparus cM1inenziz Sargent Green Juniper Te 3ga1. CONT. •sergang wnai. LI MA Ligustrvm )bottom Malus'PraireNe' N.iium Prtvet Pralregre Crabapple 28 2 3pa1. 15 gal. CONT ... PA PMM Picaaames Pin., m.g, rough- N.rway Spruce Ow.1 Mug. Pin. 3 2 8'-1 111 2a" ... CONT. PCC PC Prvnus cerasilera .—I ... Pyrus Purple Leaf S.nd0—y 12 5g.1. CONT QR RPJM c alleryana 'Autumn Blaze' Quercus r Rh.d.drendron PJM Autumn Blaze -I- Pear Red Oak 8 B 212 3" 21IY'-3" 880 888 SJ Spine. japonica 'GOY Mound' PJM R M1.dodendron G.Id Mound Spire. 18 16 Sgal. 3ga1. CONT CONT SPV Sp-- y houdel Vanh.ube Splrea 31 3ga1. CONT SP THE Synnga patu1. 'Miss Kim' Taxus media Evenow' Mies K im Ma.churl., Lilac Evedow Vew 2 2. W'-3A" 18"-2a" BBB CONT. TON CA Thuja .ecitlentalis nlgra Detention Basin Clethra Derh Am erica. Arb.rntae 3A 4'5' 080 CAS alnil.lia C.rnus alb. 'Sihirica' Summenweet Clethra Sibin- Dp ,d 33 B0 3gal 3 gal. CONT CONT IV SAC Rex veniciYels Sam b......natlenzlz Common Winterberry Amencan Elder 13 20 2g.l. 3gN CONT. CONT NOTES. • STAKE ONLY IN EXTRENELY LARDY COiDITKING AS APPROKD BY LANDSCAPE APONTECT • w KNONFI. RANT D /h- THE TREES wTRAOWNTARON E SLO OR wAP WM ENETIE WAP IL� MIRLAPOPYLCNE BWLLA+ LOOSEN, CUT, A REROK NANRAL ROO f CO OF TOP t/J of Tw BALL. ALL REMOTE SYNTIEIIC 61RLAP ORE BASKETS CUT AWAY BOTTOM RIIGS. PALRALY BACKFAL MEN RENOK REYAKRIG ONE, • RART TREE TO EXPOSE ROOT RARE, NAIN ORDER R(XT, ARK) IN SAYE ORIENTATION AS TREE wS CROWN DO NOT RANT TOO DEEP J• UYEN SIRE"o BARK WINCH TO BE APPROKK) BY LANDSCAPE ARCIRTEC! OKR PERMEABLE REED F DO ND! R•(Y 1• CLEARANCE lEY1 ro RE[ iRLRN I I I r SAUCER m BACKFILL LAM EXCAVA TED -I CwT Tf II II It=11 C1�'II YATEwA.F SOX K PREOONINATELY RANT PIT NO- CLAY CRAWL SALL (ENLARGE RAN PIT BON IN PARKING ATE ORGANIC MATERIAL AS IaAIOs TO FILL ENTRE ISLAND) DIRECTED AND APPROKD n //N1lMNL\\CL n=PLAJWTM IXT-n BY LANDSCAPE ARURT[Ci SIRNIC TNCN m SST RTYRD 1 1-R0015 a �¢�� �n q�lip w av 9 J• LATER SHREDDED BARN WILOI (TO BE APPROKD BY LANDSCAPE g 5n OW 0 EED PERMEABLE TO IASIARCHITECT)O OVENOT fABMC. Do TO o� V/ m NOT RACE aoY TACE 0 YARI STEM. ��gB�E J' SAUCER Rw IF BACKFRL LAM AlEO NATERIAL, Y SIX Is PDOOMAELY CLAY OR pRKI INCORPORATE -IERIALAS VOCRED AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RANT PIT WON U NOTES, BALL DNA -RANT SHRUB AT SANE DEPM AT 00CH SHOW HAD PREYOISLY ORONO 'LOOSEN. CUT. A RENOK BL LLM FRoN TK)P I/J Or Roo, 8At1 'STREWED BARK WADI AND NEED BARRIER FARE W BE COI- nwojS wc. USED IN BEDS %21 BALL AND BURLAP SHRUB Ni0! YIIYIL OMBM11a10 pfRVTAS LAST Attq(p l-wW.N ii TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (CCE) v1. m%toRarOHM am,W94110wlo VA{lio{wWA a www.AYdwrArA *mn llei RAIe A• IlBwwe 1OL M 11\IO{ O� DO"� A!lROVAL ■{Brp1 1RUMMOARY APPSMAL BIMtlB10/1 11111E A11eOVAL AeYONOM pwwwD01.7RIC110N ORAVAIM axnsNYi�� � .t.�wet �e�A�ie�.tN4wiP.a���erYee��ae� Re�rle NeY w a.eNM s zen.NucrzKr fuoe. �e r�we�.slw mna _reu�ww aP.wn.N Kmrole. ro a wau. �o ma'w��� r: emye a al r. ynw1 r� a w. mweF"w"'e.0w w .w'.ar :rwr 1*uo.ef°� I. w. w, • • r • 7 m On sr wr coders Vw w N. I Deb ". Dery y {embical s4�4 , f +: r ys�•,�, �yy411LL IIr11111111\\\\\ ho"am" East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vr 91SO M" LANDSCAPE PLAN DFAINUglimn"T 2MO90-53 E1IIe1 I , I RBJBERIILwmwT .SLUR DrBwnT AA DYe t 11/OB/ZM ►A 000 Seds L I• - 10' NB1eCl Alfs1e110t L XXX XWT 2OD6090* {�IEiI 1k T XXX SP3 A D.0 to •• to ... __ Do !DO to D 'Do b.0 to_�t_0 to b.o � to b.0 to to b.o _ _ -__�_b.LL_.4Yo-�b_e-to_- - .__��_ti- �o _ �____-_--_______fib- __�o.y- b.o _________ _ 1. NC DYENSM DEPENDENT ON ACTUAL PI2nNE USED. 2 SEE NAMFACTLRERS SPECS FOR BOLT PATTERN LAYOUT S CONiRALROR SPNI. VERry P0011ND SLS ARM BLE APPROARAIE CODES FUR HDONT OF POLES SHOWN aRCL DND 7ERLVM NAND HOLE Am CONN uBlr PONE MOM" SLOW (2 PCS) ME ILAIE L _ - BRACE SHEL ANCHOR BOLTS 1/2- PLC ca\vw x F b 7/4' PVC SCH 40 aR RIm QALVANUED STQL (2 PCS) 1r saPonm ROL BONORID CONalRI0.45 III AAV AAD PER _ 11-III-III-1 11-1 I I 20AL CECTRCCE ART. aw NE0. /7'N WMWA►RE f00YN40 to \--/ ° b.0 to b.I b.o b.z t2 b.2 b.2 b.1 b.o to b.o b.o to to �i b.t_-_ I b.4 b.1 to b.o b.2 3 .t t4 b.z b.I 6 b.o b.o 1.5 '2 1 b.2 5 9 b.I to \1i.4 1.9 §.1 R1.2 .5 0 9 ix2 0 t.8 7 t.6 t.,1.6 b.l b.0 t.9 't.B .6 t.5 7 RJ.6 1L5 t4 I D I I t.4 t.4 10.4 b 3 1.7 .a .J 5 b.r b.ol .J t.2 '7 4.1 1.3 2 b' b.5 b.1 b.1 b. 9 2 t t 1.5 'S.0 .2 :T '0.2 3 6.2 b.I 2 b.1 bJ ,T... 1 b.J b r b. 2.... 1. b 3 b.1 7 1. 72. §.1 I I t b.1 t.4 t, .3 t.J t .6 .1 b.I t.J t.e t.4 :D.4 t, t.4 5 J I 1.H t.7 t.8 t 9.1 §.2 I 1.4 1.7 1 1.6 §.9 i.J :9.3 i.0 t.H t i 7 ' to 9.z icy .2-bi B b-r {o- 1. 0 2 § .9 $.3 §' b.4 b i b, r b. o 4.t b.s to b.o 0 O b.o to b.o \b.o to LUMI IAIRE SCHEDULE STATISTICS S land CtY Catdop Num04r 0«vJ➢tica Lame FTN N4aat H.1ght ow.*n- SNmhd Aq * A 7 EHi4-FN-150NN OARDW FORM 10 SQUARE - TYPE IV CLEAR 150NH PSfWMIES 20' REAR PARIOND 1.4 fo Sax Alb AV/Nh 4.3 A, D SIRMIYON * 0.2 h 7.0.1 * B 2 61/4-3-ISa H-HS cAR000 FONN 10 + SQUARE - TYPE 3 CLEAR ISO NH OS317NSES ?D' STE + 0.0 Po 4.3 fe 0.0 A,N/A DLSTPoBUTWN w/ STERNAL NOVS£-SIDE SiRiD C 4 PBS-TL94-e5SCOL'TE LITFBOX H' LENSED 2 - it W FL 61717aw 12' all F i B B20/B21/B22/82.7- GANDCO TOP LWYER 350aFL4RDLPS/D/I�IEE�Dp ((�BDOLLARD 0WAIT NN BWIL70.NS y5 ) E 2 101-WT-100.NH-Si "ROOD 101 SCONCE - ♦ ROE THROW, Fur DMSNO SOLUTE CLEAR IDOW NH WWSI7NN.T« Is' GLASS LENS 0.5 footrnWr R 1.0 faO -d. g$C 8 7 Graphk Scats Fset 20 0 20 40 60 BO _� _ 1iWL�• CONSUMG ENGWEERS =) =E*hkb d F.MBMM p=w% "M* VkllYmbRTBrr �� -- s• w r mA•a a s mrlmT a CONCIFIRML AEFBOVAL ■•IM�IE IMYMNl1 AffMWU ■MMORI 1MOL AW WVAL SUDIOpN COPMUCI N =A1 1Mr w M UAW � AY baiYp s wrbYalYi air 1 aw11r PM�E � a�bYalw w Nwii Y M �N A '�� �M�Y MM Bra Ms rwYw4 �TF~wI{ vyW �yw flwnYAn•�i«s M�iaM� �YY � .w1hPw�l 1 A• I�Iri«Y 41 «44 Yr4 o.wy. � 1� 11tis1 YwPP�E M Y" [n�1r w Pw4 WNW Y IM e.w,� 4ir� i YY � �r�q Y n�� uM awl ewlw b waM •• �• • • • m arr BrAPr amewa Aw AM M& I D-aWan I D- I y ■BNYm/ aaawuu/n„ -0tiE of vE f�: y1f Y URI �'E777iN lei l lLl t t 1�`L��� pL4LMa'DW East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Bu&Wwn, VT sham. Llghft Plan DMWMs Fkmka 12MO-90-54 eildm t I p1modnaw, LM DBIWI AAL DaB I L2MJW FJ. GD Sa1B I 1' - 20' N*d Lhmm l AM x41d! 200MOODde Bomb 141 2T0L AppWtl SP4 z Tg 58N! i I 1 I , d I I AIL NM7E W *HT Ur 4j I ROUTE 96 - DOVBLE MLOW LNE �==4e za� r LL y5 I \ —I— _ _ — — _ `ti _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I \\ f --------------------- — a - -- _— EJn7NG 12' WATER-yt- _- _____ - _' _____ _-_—fir-- au._.. F+ 12 M Ab yQy .......,..,,. «..,-:.«...,,..,.»....w�,.,,.a ..../ .^'^-..«..,..»ter .,..,"...,-, y H N O ; O Z� z H g3� �p111111111„q s� NO 44 A.. I I I 1 + I I I � Pz + ! 1 ! i �yyf y$y y6 N `-Hy` aAg Z i5 8 0 p 2 v B \\ x ��_-BASE NEARING COURSE (TYPE NI) (MAOT IM) COURSE (TYPE N) (VAOT Am) ( I� e CRUSHED GRAVEL (MAOF M .05) D J( �CI �'� `-� . �—GRAVEL BASE (MAQT 704.04) MIRAfI 500X STABttlZATION FABRIC INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WM MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS E 6" SAND BORROW AND CUSHION TO BE USED IN POORLY DRAINED SOILS OR OVER BEDROCK (VAOT 703.03) III III III -• �I INDIS DFILL LOGYRADE OR ... COMPE LIED 00 0©© 00 000 1. SUBBASE. SANG CUSHION AND SUBGRADE SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AND COMPACTED TO THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WiN WRMOVT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD A-26. WHERE MORE STRINGENT LOCAL ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN ADOPTED RELADVE TO ROAD DIMENSIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, THEY SHOULD GOVERN. Z. COMPACT ALL SUBBASE MATERIALS TO 95X MAKIMUM DENSITY (STANDARD PROCTOR). S. IF GROUNDWATER OR SOFT SPOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO DISCUSS ADDED MEASURES SUCH /��� AS UNOERORAIN, L_1 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT cwsuTND LNaNaRs LASI REMBED az 9 RWF2RAm ppErt.x[0 1:20 I IrIVaI nfr[w[0 sl d� Q HANDICAP ACCESS RAMP OOS IMgEM 00NMTNc ENpxfTrtB LAST RE—D 02/15/05 - BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT EXPANSION .KNIT MA IERIAL 2" FINISH COURSE TYPE II 5" BASE COURSE TYPE 11 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6" r� Y RELEAL _. L . " ......._. CONCRETE CURB --C CRUSHED CRAWL _— la" GRAVEL FOR SUB -BASE --- MIRAFl 50OX ROAD STABILIZATION FABRIC L L PAVEMENT, CONCRETE CURB & SIDEWALK I• D SPECIFICADONS: 112" EAPANSION/CON/FACTION JOINT WITH ASPHALT IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD FILLER EVERY SO FEET. SCORED OR TOEx.ED JOINT (1" DEPTH OR 1/3 ME TOTAL DI OF WALK) WITHA SEPARATION DISTANCE EQUAL TO THE IMDM OF ME SIDEWALK. FULL -BREAK OR COMPLETE JOINT EVERY 20 FEET. NOTE DISTANCES ARE TYPICAL AND MAY BE ALTERED FOR SPECIFIC SITE CONOTIONS. -- 5" THICK CONCRETE WEAR COURSE (4000 PSI) 1 MINIMUM B" GRAVEL BASE I s TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK 112 - , D s� SILTY SAND. CLAYEY AND INTERNAL AI aF FRICDON (F)-2B CONDITCN C- 2.5:1 BACKSLCPE NO SURCHARGE TYPE i CONNE11. 2MMTX K" Du. CORROSION RESISTANT REBAR BATTER ANGLE 4. __ VARIES 9 BURY DEPTH( I 1' MIN GROUND MIRAFl —AGRHO SXT WITH TYRE 1 COVNECDON (TYP ALL LAYERS) FEWNRED FOR WALL HEIGHTS MCA TER M4 AN 'B" IO t FREE -DRAINING --- BACKFlLL PULED , 0" WOE BEHIND WALL I 13� -- . WWASHED STOVE LEW C PAD 1I LEIELNG PAD OEPM) NNVFRTCAL PLACEMENT FOR lrY0GR1p DYERS IS PERF DRAIN PIPE WM SOCK (OR 2.EI.ENCTN FROM THE ED ASE nEVAnON. S MEASURED FROM ME FRONT AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER) FACE OF ME BLOCK. S. 41' IMDE GEOCONNECTOR BLOCKS ARE ACCEPTABLE /� ALTERNATES FOR 28" WIDE BLOCKS 1 9' GEOGRID WALL W/ 18" GEOCONNECTOR BLOCKS ITs - --5" CONCRETE SLAB, BROOM FINISH 3000 PSI MIN. IMTH FIBER MESH - REINFORCE WITH WNF 4"x4" — 6 BANK RUN CRA Ii - COMPA i C ED SUBCRAOE 6 "\ REINFORCED CONCRETE PAD FOR DUMPSTER pOiroEu caysuLTlNc LNaNEERz N o,/,s/o, 195 90 Q.... *'?` � C �i fl AFC � � ��? of,90 eU��n9ton Q Driveway Cross-section B / G TRLDaLGDNBMTNGLNL�TER= TRi DELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (17CE) 478 DWr Pall[ Road Box 308 Wllmton, Vmnont 054% (807) 879-Mi �NCEPTMAL APPROVAL SINMLT.SION PRNZWB1ARv APPROVAL SIIDAVSSION FBAAL APPROVAL SLAMLS.SION C0NSnIx7ION DUVVDLoS I pa.Wgar Yalan.Inp e mt Wtenen n n anl> mnetrvcMn aM+�. I zd On.InR• Reaa� °"Ha• mNne 1. Ee HxY mxe uise �c °YA h/can a•aec�lm� Ine4ot�eNneWn of T�Jw cmwimR G9 e•Yie (itt� y��are �BY: n e Era„ W Her can lrvet o ne pc 01 (�/ �)M .ee, ap and ac IRE sw�xe�aMn4•en .• w� .wl. -d Tam rov gAaPew c•e ml�:;';�m� �•E�;H a a�. �• -:a: �:• �.�naw� Im: a:a.Ma. % M. IN. Y:.: Nblk; ;e nwn ,h,. aaaY ce ,aW. ,M me. No. I D.W. GI! !y BLVIwIDIIIIII `\� SAY OF VIA MG * 110. 7x37 * - GNL = K f LlcnrA.D �: Fast Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont Sh15et 71de Site Details Dlavift NMmbu: 2UU609U-71 Exhmmon. 00 Pm)eU TDI RPT D—: PUP Date: 12/O8/U6 SCde: AS SHOWN D] FOR PAVED SURFACES FOR GR SSEO AREAS �', •' REPLACE TOPSDIL, SEED, AND MULCH (� OVERFILL TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT G V°.y.. L - FINISHED ROAD GRADE i p °�[ THOROUGHLY COMPACTED SELECTED BACFLL FROM TRENCH EXCAVATION, FREE OF STONES °' ° •"^^C LARGER THAN J' IN . NET - I COMPACT BACI(FILL IN 6" LIFTS. STABILIZATION FABRIC OVER SAND (WRAFI 500X THE SIDES OU TRENCHES SHALL BE SHEETED OR EQUAL) ._.- j OR SLOPED TO VJSHA STANDARDS. STORM DRAIN — - — THOROUGHLY COMPACTED 3/� CRUSHED STONE BEDDING FOR CMP, PVC, OR HOPE PIPE eDLb o� i O o P UNDISTURBED SOIL I; ` NOTES ON STORM DRAIN TRENCH: 0 A WET TRENCH SHALL BE DEWATERED 6 PRIOR TO INSTALLING BEDDING THE LETTER 'D" SHOWN W THE DETAIL hL INDICATES THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE. DEPTH OF STORM DRAIN LINES VARY, REFER TO PLANS FOR DEPTH IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS. �1 TYPICAL STORM DRAIN TRENCH pRrp p4 HEAVY DUN 3 RANGE INLET FRAME AND GRATE, NEENAH R-3405B OR LEBARON LF248-2 WHERE INLET IS NOT LOCATED - NEXT TO A CURB, USE A 1 Lp Oho. 4 FLANGE FRAME --GROUT FRAME TO INCHES FROM TOP --CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT +-� - PRONOE 14" SECTION (IF NEEDED) RUBBER BOOT (PRESS STEEL PSX) 11UCTURAL AXIMUM DIAMETER PIPE t51 P,CSPCAAPPEP I PM 6'A6t' WELDED WRE FABRIC OR AS REWIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY 4 BARS, 12" O.C. BOTHR AS REWIRED TO MAINTAIN TRUCTURAL INTEGRITY - 8' GRAVEL FOR SUB BASE OR AS REWIRED BY ENGINEER IF W:T OR UNSTABLE CONDITIONS EXIST -'. UNDISTURBED SOIL TYPE W CATCH BASIN q w/nA96 - POLYETHYLENE FLARED END SECTION. —� ADS OR EWAL. 0 I�T.I1�Il'IO�II�'D7'I'I���II'IH1'p/mom � _ ' PLAN VIEW INLET OUTLET CONDITION CONDITION I' SMOOTH INTERIOR, CORRUGATED EXTERIOR, HIGH DENSITY DLYETHYLENE PIPE (HYPE A ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (ADS) WISHED GRACE --- N-t2, OR EQUAL WHERE NOTED ON PLANS SIDES MATCH TAPERED PROWOWR 121T TYPE I RIPRAP SIDES OF END SECTION OVFR I2' TYPE P204 RIPRAP SLOPE AS PER SITE PLAN 1 SLOPE AS PER 511E PLAN 1 Il�o 1 'D' 1 1 e� Il � 11 1-- INLET -_-. payEMriENE FLARED END SECTION, ------ OUTLET CONDITION ADS OR EQUAL CONDITION ELEVATION VIEW a' �1 POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) END SECTION /1._I' R o oN_oTTM ------CAST IRON LIGHT O:O A 00 00 DUTY RATED GRATE OO 00 O,O 00 24' DRAIN BASIN NYUPLAST OR APPROVED EQUAL L Tmrmljiimritpt*,mt.. F Mt'tt'rtiRm.rt!eY'Rm B' PVC —, '". SOR 35 OUTLET 1 12" PLC MR 35 ADAPTER- `'�. �y FOR USE W TN m619F 4�! �• VARIOUS TYPES OF Uj WTH WTLETS TERRGHT ADAPTERS - - ------ 6GRAVEL OR AS REQUIRED SUN -35 SEWER BY ENGINEER A 1000 CORRUGATED PVC RA RIB PVC CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE S YARD DRAIN w/I5/a1 MINIMUM 50' DR AS SHOW ON PLAN _ U Q [� Ci ,-�( �0. --n CWSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE I. STONE SIZE SHALL BE NOMINAL t 1/2 INCHES. i P Z. LENGTH SHALL BF NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET y J. THICKNESS SMALL NOT BE LESS THAN 8 INCHES 4. FILTER FABRIC (MIRIFI SOON, OR EWAL) SHALL L` BE PLACED OVER ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF STONE. 5. MYTH SHALL BE NOT LESS IHAN NLL WITH OF ALL POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS. O "j1JJj 6. WHEN NECESSARY, TRUCK WHEELS SHALL BE � WASHED OR CLEANED TO REMOK SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT —OF J�Q WAY WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE IN ON AN AREA STABILIZED WtiH CRUSHED STONE, WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT BASIN, ALL SEDIMENT SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING ANY STORM DRAIN, DITCH, OR WATERCOURSE, THROUGH USE OF APPROVED PLAN ROSION CO—O METHOD, /H MINIMUM 8" O:Qr I. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING CRUSHED STONE 2' 'J OR FLOWNG CF "IM HE E ONTO A PUBLIC --EXISTING ' GRADE RGHi OF WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIQOIC TOP DRESSING WiH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CCONDITI AND. AS WD.LNTRIX S MAINTENANCE SITE SE ALL SEDIMENT DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC - { RG4i OF WAY SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY ,5 �$TABILIIATIIXJ FABRIC TOPOf SUBGRAOE sEcnoN [ '1 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ,I)I.Ap E-�spD1M RZCII Vi et) ET EC I I f6 evrlin9torr TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 Malr Park Poad Bw 3W VAYigoT, Vemnld 054% WZ) 6]9-a31 1KY PIAIa{ Aal NRAaTA ION M NVJf6 OF CONcwl "R OVAL BTUML451ON PRLLVANARV APPROVAL SUBNaSSM FWAL APPROVAL SIAMLSSION CONSTRUCTION DRAWBiEd W conol.uct an dmin mPc /vaI dwgtl (ICE) e 8 nrn op.v m of u nv anleclp ot�M .m„)an m tM 5ubm vownEVLm^aaEnO vvv�uv M..v -tyw oCrwI1oA U�o Ma p I 1 Y pm bi% lapmvury top copy con — Me - NO. Dewlptlan De6e 6y F—isl f S�\\\ \\•V 10F fill,, , ♦j♦i ,�F, Y o;OZc�♦ice CIVIL V,n •... <141fiE0.1 \ pwied title East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont SheetrAe Stormwater & Erosion Control Details DwWU%Number: 2006090-72 ExDduion: 00 PIOJ-d IT Mer: RPT DlaWnt IMP Date: 12111106 Scale: AS SHOWN AIN FOR PAYED SURFACES 4 FUR GRaSSEO AREAS A• TOPSOIL (LOAM) SEES AND MULCH, AND OVERFILL FOR SETTLEMENT I� CRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE W a j r I EN DEPTH EXCEEDS 5' BAMFILL FREE OF ORGANIC OR FROZEN MATERIAL. COMPACTED TO 95X DENSITY S TANDAD PROCTOR UNDER ROADS OR y PAVED SURFACES, AND PDX DENSITY ELSEWHERE p 0 r INITIAL 12' OF SELECT BACKFILL FREE � 3 OF ORGANIC TO FROZEN MATERIAL � COMPACTEDTO R DENSITY STANDARDDPROCTOR. WHERE 4' OF COVER CAMOT BE MAINTMNED COVER SEWER MAIN WIN 2" DOW STYROFOAM INSULATION BOARD. PLACE INSULATION AT ALL - ROAD CROSSINGS. EXMD STMOFOAM ID' U BE YED ROAD N BON DIRECTIONS - 6' RW MR 35 I, L4h h D + 2 Twi(:FlI. _ SEWER SERVICE I W CLASS I BEDDING IIII BACKiTLL I. 3/4" CRUSHED STONE LENGTH M OPEN TRENCH SHALL BACKFlLL BE KEPT A MI A NIMUM. _ \11 2. IF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL 15 HAUNGHNC -�-. I / ME NVED BELOW BEDDING, REPLACE WIN MATERIAL APPROVED BY BEDDING - ENGINEER AND COMPACTED TO 95% MAXIMUM LETAMPERS TA - J. NO MECHANICAL MPP ERS SHALL N I I� '._LLB.. INSURE PIPE IS NOT DAMAGED. i.-.1 11 0. BEDDINGUSED TODIRECUOVEflRR PIPE STABLE,i0 CONTINUO S AND TLY NM 1- - D + 29" - SUPPORT FM LENGTH ME FULL LETH OF PE, C1 TYPICAL SEWER TRENCH 3/4"= 1' D' III mmI3p.I OQNPxTNG LHNNEsas LASI REISPI ae/11/N sWIo-a . --= -- 'SEWER' CO -DRAIN' CAST IN COVER AS APPROPRIATE SEWER FINISH MADE. SLOPE TO DIVERT RUNOFF AWAY FROM PAD. 4"°2' x 2' CONCRETE PAD ON 4' GAVEL BASE IN GRASSED AREAS 4' GAVEL BASE CAST IRON VALVE BOX M ABS VALVE BOX WIN CAST IRO COLLAR 4" PVT BOB 35 RISER 4' PVC SM 55 45' ELBOW ''DrD"x'O'x4" PVC SUR 35 45' WYE LDIAMEIER "D- ---'0" SDR 35 PW PIPE Q TYPICAL SEWER CLEANOUT r D RA mVnOL LLWsu _ EN aNEERs m/ Tee TES77NG SEWERc A. TEST ME GRAVITY SEWER BY A PRESSURIZED AIR TEST BETWEEN CONSECUTIVE MANHOLES. PLUG THE TWO EN CF ME PIPE AND CONNECT ME AIR CONTROL EQUIPMENT TO ME TAPPED END. B. SUPPLY AIR SLOWLY TO ME PIPE UNTIL REACHING A CONSTANT PRESSURE OF 3.5 P51. THROTTLE ME AM SUPPLY SO MAT ME PRESSURE REMAINS ABOVE 3.0 PSI FOR AT LEAST 5 MINUTES M ALLOW TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION IN ME PIPE. MONITOR PRESSURE WITH A GAUGE HAVING A RANGE MGM 0 TO 5 PSI . ME GAUGE SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM DIVISIONS OF 0.1 PSI AND AN ACCURACY OF ♦- 0.04 PSI. REGULATE ME AM PRESSURE TO PREVENT IT FRO EXCEEDING 5.0 PSI. C AFTER STABIUZATIM, AD..UST PRESSURE TO 3.5 PSI AND SHUT OFF AIR SUPPLY. WHEN ME PRESSURE REACHES 3.0 PSI START ME STIR WATCH AND RECORD ME TIME IT TAKES TO REACH 2.5 PSI. THE TIME REWIRED FOR ME PIPE SIZE MUST BE AT LEAST: PIPE DIAMETER _MS SECONDS PE DIAMETER MINUTES SECONDS 4• 2 33 13 91f 35 6' J 30 18' JI 8" 5 06 2' 12 45 10" 6 22 21' U JO 1T' ) !9 D. IF LATERALS AD ING.UOEO IN THE TESTING ME AVERAGE OF THE PIPES (USING DIAMETER AND LENGTH) WILL BE CALCULATED AND MULTIPLIED BY M.2 SECONDS PER INCH DIAMETER TO OBTAIN ME REQUIRED ME. E. IF MERE 1S GROUD WATER ABOVE ME SEINER L10 THE AIR TEST PRESSURE WLL BE INCREASED BY 0.5 PSI FOR EACH FOOT OF WATER ABOVE ME INVERT OF ME PIPE. DIFFERENCES DUE TO AM TEMPERATURE AND BAROMETRIC PRESSURE WILL BE CONSIDERED NEGLIGIBLE. F F ME TEST THE IS LESS MAN NAT REWIRED IN THE ABOVE TABLE, ME PIPE WLL HAVE FAILED AND ADEQUATE REPAIRS AND RETESTING WILL BE REWIRED. G FOR 8' AND SMALLER PIPES: IF DURING THE 5 MINUTE SATURATION PERIOD, ME PRESSURE DROP IS LESS MAN 0.5 PSI AFTER ME INITIAL STABILIZATION AD AIR HAS NOT BEEN ADDED, ME PIPE SECTION UNDERGOING THE TEST SHALL HAVE PASSED. USE CLASS D (25W PSI) CONCRETE FOR THRUST BLOCKS, PLACE 4 MIL. POLYETHYLENE BETWEEN FITTING AND THRUST BLOCK. PLACE THRUST BLOCK AGAINST UNDISTURBED TRENCH WALL - CONCRETE BEARING AREA ON FITTING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1/2 SWARE FOOT THRUST BLOCKS BASED ON 2W PSI WORKING PRESSURE PLUS SURGE ALLOWANCE OF 100 PSI. 1 - nr. 90' ELBOW TEE 1 22V ELBOW r r 45' ELBOW ^� I j• '-EXTEND 6" INTO 1 -CAP W1 MEGA JOINT FRENCH WALL NOT: FOR REWCERS, PROVIDE - - TRENCH WALL W TYPICAL BEARING AREA FOR THE UME FYPE BASED ON 60POUNDS -UNDISTURBED SOLI. FOR EACH 1 NCH REDUCTION IN SIZE. ETHICAL CAP REDUCER SOIL SAFE BEARING 2".. J" a 4" 6' e' 10' T2" TYPE LOAD LBS/FT° AP Ttt 90' 45' 22.5' TFE 90' 1 90' 45' 22.5' T¢ 90' 45' I2.5' CLAY 1000 5.0 7.0 4.0 2.0 10.5 I5. 80 40 IB.O 25.0 14.0 70 2&0 38.0 210 f0.5 J9.0 SS.O J0.0 15.0 SAND 2000 2.5 3,5 2.0 I.0 5.5 7.5 1.0 2.0 9.0 11.0 7.0 3.5 14.0 19.0 10 0 3.0 20.0 27.5 13.0 8.0 DRAWL TILL JOW 4000 2.0 1.5 2.5 20 1.5 10 1.0 as 3.5 III &0 4.0 J.0 2.0 IS ION 6.0 1.5 8.5 IT 5.0 3.5 2.5 20 9.0 7.0 12.3 9.5 70 50 4.5 2.6 IJ.O 10.0 18.5 14.0 10.0 7.5 5.0 I.0 SHALE 10000 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 I,0 1.5 10 0.5 2.0 2.5 1.5 1.0 J.O 15 ID L. 4.0 3.3 J.0 1.3 �1 WATER MAiN THRUST BLOCKS TU S SEO 9/17/P2 WIR-021M MOUND SLIGHTLY TO ALLOW UR SETTLEMENT. PROVIDE 6" TOPSOIL, SEED 4 MULCH MARKING TAPE (SUPPLIED BY UTILITY COMPANY) RANpO FILL WITH NO STONES {t_ LARGER MAN B" PVC COOLLY SCH 40 FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE FYC CONDUIT 40 IJJ FOR POWER SERR VICE r liT Dill G �I IIII IIII 24" TRENCH J NOTE: THE ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE. AND GAS LAYOUT AND THEIR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS SHOWN ON MIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL. THE FINAL LAYOUT PLAN, CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS WILL BE PREPARED BY ME APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. ME CONTRACT BETWEEN THE UTILITY AND ME DEVELOPER WLL DELINEATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING MATERIALS AND VARIOUS TASKS RELATING TO ME INSTALLATION. ME LOCATION OF ANY SUCH UTILITY ON THESE PLANS IS SUB$CT TO CHANCE AND ME FINAL PLANS OF THE UTILITY COMPANY WILL GOVERN. l 1 UTILITY TRENCH r•-1'_a• WATER CROSSINGS: SEWERS CROSSING WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID BENEATH ME WATER MAN WIN AT LEAST 18 WISIE VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN ME WTSIDE OF THE SEWER AND THE OUTSIDE OF ME WATER Al..MWHEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN ME 1B" VERTICAL SEPARATION OR WERE ME SEWER MUST BE LAO ABOVE ME WATER MAN: 1) ME CROSSING SNALL BE ARRMCED SO NAT ONE FULL LENGTH OF SEWER IS CENTERED ABOVE OR BELOW ME WATER LINE WITH SEVER JOINTS AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM WATER JOINTS 2) ME SEWER PIPE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A MINIMUM MSTAN CE OR ION FEET EITHER ASIDE OFLME HOR RE CROSSING A TOTAL OF THREE PIPE LENCNS. WHICHEVER IS GREATER: 3) THE SECTION CONSTRUCTED TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS MUST BE PRESSURE TESTED TO MAINTAIN So PSI FOR 15 MINUTES WITHOUT LEAKAGE PRIOR TO BA FILLING BEYOND ME FOOT ABOVE ME PE TO ASSURE WATER nCl MESS 4) WHERE A WATER MAIN MOSSES UNDER A SEWER, ADEQUATE STRUCTURAL SUPCRT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ME SEWER TO PREVENT DAMAGE EO ME WATER MAN. FOR PAVED SURFACES ti FOR GRASSED AREAS ---SEED AND MULCH. OVERALL FOR SETTLEMENT MADE AT 2.1 SLOPE WHEN DEPTH EXCEEDS 5' 2 _ W RFREE OF ORGANIC OR FROZEN ROZ02EN MAIENIAL. CCMPA-- -- - I STAND EU TO T R U111 NDER m STANDARD FACTOR UNDER ROADS M PA VELA SURFACES, AND 90% DENSITY ELSEWHERE. 1 IMTIAL 12' OF SELECT BACRFILL FREE OF ORGANIC OR FROZEN MATERIAL STANDARDPROCTOR. OTO 95X DENSITY NI TYPICAL - - PVC WATER SERVICE (AWWA C-900) DRIB OR DUCTILE IRO WATER MAIN (AWWA-Ci5I.51) G CLASS 52 (SEE SITE PLAN ROR S12E) CLASS 1 BEGGING 3/4- CRUSHED STWE CLASS Il MMBEGGING A. 1 112'COARSE SAND a GRAVEL IF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS REMOVED III--- REPLACE WITH MATERIAL RENEWED BY ENGINEER. COMPACT TO 95X DENSITY �1 TYPICAL WATER TRENCH 01/11Ab6 WIR-026M� ---- - "WATER' CASs IN COVER ,- - FINISHED MADE ------------- --- - 3 PIECE SLIDING VALVE BOX IMM COVER ALL FITTING ARE TO HAVE 'MEGA-lUG' ^L RETAINER GLANDS 6' MII NIMUM TAPPING SLEEVE OVER EASBNG WATER MAIN, MUELLER W19 FOR A.0 M MUELLER H615 FOR G, of, OR PM 4 MIL POLY BARRIER;;, - TAPPING VALVE (AWWA C509) �J/f' CORPORATION STOP FOR TESTING MUELLER 9-25008 M CAMBRIDGE BRASS - J/4' STORE BEGGING \ ( ooJ NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO APPLY TO TOWN - - WATER DEPARTMENT FOR WATER LINE TAPING PERMIT. CMI ACTOR TO SUBMIT COMPLETE SPEOFlCATION OF MATERIALS WIM PERMIT -- CUSS D CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK APPLICATION. CONTRACTOR TO PRESSURE TEST PIPING TO 200 PSI PRIM TO TAP. (REFER TO THRUST BLOCK TABLE FOR SIZE) TYPICAL TAPPING VALVE 3/4'=I'-D' 7002 mulxu c— — ENaN S IH/le/m 1. ALL WATER LINE AND RELATED WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WIN ME SREGFlCA TIONS AND DETAILS FOR ME INSTALLATION OF WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES FM ALL WA�-gl ME CIA PLAIN WATER DISTRICT ME CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTONCOLGHESTER FIRE DISTRICT%1 AND THE VILLAGE OF JER 0' NEMCETMM ME 'CND SREOFICATIOS.° 2. ALL WATER INSTALLATION WORK AND WATER DISTRIBUTION MATERIAL MUST COMPLY MN THE •CND SPEGFCATONS'. J. ALL DOMESTIC SERVICES AND FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS NAT ARE CONNECTED TO ME PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH A BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY, AND AN APPROPRIATE THERMAL EXPANSION SYSTEM IN COMPLIANCE WN THE ORGINANCEFOR ME CORM OF CROSS WNECTIWS WITHIN WATER SYSTEM OF ME CITY OF SCUM BURLINGTO HENCEFORN ME "BACKFLOW MgNANCE.' 4. NO WATER LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED AFTER NOVEMBER 15 AND BEFORE APRIL f WITHOUT PITH APPROVAL FROM ME SUPERINTENDENT. 5. ALL WATER USED DURING FLUSHING AND TESTING OF THE NEW MAIN MUST BE BEMLMINATED PRIOR TO ENTERING ANY WATER M THE STATE. 6. NO UNDERGROUND UTIUEY SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN FOUR FEET OFTHE WATER MAN ONEITHER SIDE WIN ME EXCEPT! OF STORM SEWER AND SANITY SEWER AS STATED IN ME CWO SPEOFlCATIMS. D UTUTY SHALL W PLACED WHIN FIVE FEET OF ANY DATE VALVE M FEN EEET MANY FIRE HYDRANT. 7. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, ME BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHOULD CONTACT THE SCUM BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT (SHIM)) TO DISWSS OTY REQUIREMENTS FOR METER SIZING, METER SETTINGS, AND BACKROW PREKNTON. 8. SBWD SHALL BE NOTIFIED PRIM TO BACKELLING TO INSPECT ALL JOINTS, FITTINGS, MAIN LINE TAPS, APPURTENANCES, WATER LINE MOSSNGS. AND TESTING. RJ�CE/vet) DEC l 12006 City of So, 8unin9to TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (fCE) 478 Blair Park ROM BOX 308 WHIM... Veirric Tt 05495 (802) 8796331 _.,,TILY MN A4 fIRAY 1'Ol tNl 11tpJl OR CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL SlOMLS.610N 1R NARY APPROVAL $IDMlS.SpN ANAL APPROVAL SIIDMIS.SION CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS _ bn lla a .Ml ." pampa, Inf°A nn 1 cadMry d m�nc °iMiv wd °cigti/m t ° ercu9nt t Wn el ry �p ..,. (10E� N Su0 mA°wn�°ms° l °v °wM .fat° mA ecW °°R �App,ard� net En lln MR° CnanCOePi to ma Ero 4. t 4 1N UW..1- - III. -1y m° ma° No. Dn .w. Dale gY 0\011111111/// F GILET�/\�: <I f/j ll/IIII 111\1\\ Protect Tme East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont Sheet 11de Utility Details Drawing Numbv: 2006090-73 Exhirlsim: W PID)ect TLIarYager: .MM Elm-: RMP Date: 12/08/06 Smile : AS SHOWN �71 TESTING SEWERS ,R�Lu �oNz•UL RING aaNaNs IA:r REMSED 6T/P6/96 5•WR-DL45 WATER / STORM CROSSING D Fn A9 AIR-.,S �1 CWD GENERAL NOTES D3 1 3)SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY, AND AFTER EACHJYATION EVENT FICANT PPERFORMED EQUAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED.) MAINTENANCE SHALL BE AS NEEDED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN 'BULGES' FILTER FABRIC, M WOVEN DE WIRE FABRIC DEVELOP IN ME SILT FENCE. WOODEN OR METAL STAKE 4)BRMEN STAKES SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPIOY (MAX. 10. O.C.) --r— KEY FABRIC INTO GROUND (MIN. 5') FLOW CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR SILT FENCE SILT PENCE SHALL BE EITHER PRE -FABRICATED EROSION CONTROL FENCE (MIRAFI ENVROPENCE, OR EQUAL). M CONSTRUCTED -IN -PLACE. AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. PR -FF ARRI A��FD SILT F urF 1)FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO WOUND CONTOURS. AND FILTER FABRIC SIDE SHALL FACE UPSTREAM, MESH AND STAKES SHALL FACE DOWNSTREAM, 2) MEN SHALL BE EXCAVATED MINIMUM 5 INCHES DEEP ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF PENCE LINE. EXCESS FLAP OF FILTER FABRIC (MINIMUM B INCHES) SHALL BE PLACED IN TRENCH. TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED. CONSTRUCTION IN THIS MANNER PREVENTS SEDIMENT -LADEN RUNOFF FROM FLOWING UNDER SILT PENCE. CMCTRUClEO-IN-PdLE SLT FENCE I)FENCE POST SHALL BE DRIVEN, TO mer MAXIMUM ON CENTER; POSTS SHALL BE DRIVEN MINIMUM 24" BELOW GRADE. FENCE SHALL BE POSITIONED AS SHOWN, PARALLEL TO ME GROUND CONTOURS 2) MEN SHALL BE EXCAVATED MINIMUM 6 INCHES DEEP ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF PENCE LINE. 3)WOWN WIRE FABRIC (14 GA., 6 INCH MAX. MESH OPENING) SHALL BE STAPLED OR FASTENED SECURELY WIN WIRE TIES TO UPSTREAM SIDE OFFENCE POSTS. WOVEN WIRE FABRIC SHALL EXTEND MINIMUM M INCHES AROW WADE BRI. 4)PLTER FAC SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF WOVEN WIRE FABRIC WITH WIRE TIES, SPACED EVERY 24 NCHES, AT TOP AND MID - SEC BON OF PENCE. MINIMUM B INCH FLAP OF FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED IN TRENCH ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE, AND BACKFN.LED. 5)WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FABRIC AD"N EACH OTNER. THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY 6 INCHES. FOLDED AND STAPLED, 6)SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY, AND AFTER EAGH SIGNIFICANT PREOPITATION EVENT. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED, AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN 'BULGES" DEVELOP IN SILT FENCE, SiLT FENCE R TMIDru DLINmILTNE MICE- LAST REVISE PB/w/ro. - --ANCHOR WIN SOIL 'FILL EMBANKMENT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ---SEED AND MULCH IN ACCORDANCE WIN SPECFICATIO145 +..V..�..�c R ANCHOR WIN SOIL y✓'� ',III I CONSTRUCTION WEOFlCA PIONS FOR SLUE STABILIZATION EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 1. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE MANUFACTURED CURLED WOOD EXCELSIOR FIBERS. GR AGRICULTURAL STRAW. ME BLANKET SHALL BE COVERED WIN A PHOTODEGRADABLE EXTRUDED PLASTIC MESH. ME BLANKETS SHALL BE FURNISHED IN ROLLS AND SHALL BE EQUAL TO EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS MANUFACTURED BY AMERICAN EXCELSIOR M BE NMTH AMERICAN GREEN. 2. EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS M MATTING SHALL BE PLACED M ALL REGRADED SLOPES AS DESIGNATED M ME SITE PLAN. 3. AFTER SLOPES HAVE BEEN GRADED REASONABLY CLOSE TO FINAL GRADES, LIME, FERTILIZER, AND TOPSOIL HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, ME EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE LAPPED 6 INCHES AT ME SEAMS AND ANCHORED AT ME TOE AND TM OF SLOPES. BURY ME BLANKET 6 INCHES DEEP AT ME TOE M YORE, AND COVER WIN TOPSOIL. STAKE M STAPLE ME BLANKETS AT 4 FEET M CENTER BON WAYS OVER ME ENTIRE SLOPE. [_n \ SLOPE STABILIZATION N. TS. HEAVY DUTY 3 FLANCE INLET FRAME A GRATE, NEENAH R-J405B OR LEBARM LF24B-2 - 2'-0' 2--O. - 2' STOVE FIND PLACED AROUND INLET GRADE SLOPE AROUND - TRUCTIME UNIFORMLY MULCH DISTURBED AREA — MIRAFI 140N FILTER FABRIC OVER STRUCTURE. UNDER GRATE AND UNDER STONE 1. THE SEDIMENT TRAP SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY EXCAVATING A TEMPORARY SUMP ADJACENT TO THE STORM INLET. ME SUMP SHALL HALE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF SIX NCHES MEASURED FROM ME TOP RINO OF ME STORM INLET. CUT SLOPES SHALL BE 3.1 GR FLATTER AND STABILIZED WITH MULCH TO PREVENT EROSKW. 2. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY WRAPPING FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140) OVER ME OPENING AND UTILIZING 1-1/2- -2- STONE FOR FILTRATION OF SEGMENT. 3. ME STRUCTURE SHALL BE INSPECTEO WEEKLY AND WTMN 24 HOURS AFTER A STORM EVENT MAT RESULTS IN A DISCHARGE LAVING ME CONSTRUCTION SITE. REPAIRS MADE AS NEEDED. SEGMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FRM ME MAP WHEN THE MATERIAL HAS ACCUMULATED TO WITHIN 4' OF ME INLET. SEDIMENT SHALL BE SPREAD OVER STABILIZED AREAS ON SLOPES LESS MAN 4R AND IF NECESSARY, SEEDED WITH GRASS TO PREVENT EROSION. 4. THE TEMPORARY BASIN SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND STADIUM WITH SOD UPON APPROVAL OF ME ENGINEER. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF ROOTS M OMER WOODY VEGETATION AS WELL AS OVERSIZED STONE AND ROCKS. 2 STONE INLET PROTECTION DELL CO.vSut THE ENENEERS LAST REMISE E2/25/E5 OR-SNIS SPACING VARIES DEPENDING ON I CHANNEL SLOPE 1. STONE WILL BE PLACED W A FILTER FABRIC FOUNDATION TO ME LINES, WADES AND LOCATIONS SHOWN IN THE —A PLAN. _ 2. SET SPACING OF CHEW DAMS TO SAME ELEVATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GREST ASSUME THAT ME ELEVATKNS G- THE CREST OF ME DOWNSTREAM DAM IS AT ME SANE ELEVATION GR THE TOE OF ME UPSTREAM DAM. TOE J. EXTEND ME STONE A MINIMUM OF 1.5 _ FEET BEYOND THE DITCH BANKS TO PREVENT CUTTING AROUND TINE CAN. PRO fIIE 4, PROTECT ME CHANNEL DOWNSTREAM - A OF ME LOWEST CHECK DAM FROM SCOOP AND EROSION WITH STONE M LINER AS APPROPRIATE. 5. ENSURE THAT CHANNEL \ y IN / /- 15 IN - . - APPURTENANCES SUCH AS CULVERT ENTRANCES BELOW CHECK DAMS ARE NOT .E SUBCT TO DAMAGE OR BLOCKAGE FROM DISPLACED STONE. 6. TO BE PACED IN DITCHES OVER FILTER I AIII1IC 2'-15" GRADED STONE 2%, R IF RIP RAP IS NOT INSTALLED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DITCH IS CLEANED M AS MDERED BY ENGINEER. SECTION A -A `'�. aN- AX MAXIMUM GRAINAGE AREA 2 ACHES 2 '4 Y I •+( . 2 CCNMTIER CHECK DAM DITCH POPE SPACING - —FEET ,1 20 4 So SECTION B-B 5 40 6 IS Z m B 25 STONE CHECK DAM MINIMUM 50. OR AS SHOWN ON PLAN CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1. STONE SIZE SHALL BE NOMINAL 1-1/2 INCHES. . 2. LENGTH SHALL BE NOT LESS MAN 30 FEET '. A p J. THICKNESS SHALL NOT BE LE55 MAN B INCHES 4. FILTER FABRIC (MIRIFI 500X, OR EQUAL) SHALL BE PLACED OVER ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF STOVE. I _ - I- 5. WIDTH SHALL BE NOT LESS MAN FULL WIDTH ✓a OF ALL POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS. Cf O 6. WHEN NECESSARY, TRUCK WHEELS SHALL BE WASHED OR CLEANED i0 REMOVE SEDIMENT 8 w O O o �Q PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT -OF O WAY WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE IN ON AN AREA STABILIZED WIN - CRUSHED STONE, WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL SEMEN i SHALL BE PREVENIED FROM ENTERING ANY STORM DRAIN, DITCH, W WATERCOURSE, MROUCH USE OF APPROVED PLAN EROSION CONTROL METHOD. �VJy O.QP T. ME ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A MINIMUM B' CRUSHED STONE CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING N M'AY IISEMAYY .- EXISTING ,. GRADE RICHF-O REEQUIRE PELF ODIC TM DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CMDITIMS DEMAND, AS WELL AS MAINTENANCE OF ALL SITE SEDIMENT CONMO. MEASURES. ALL SEDIMENT DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC RICHE -OF -WAY SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEOIAiELY 1� STABILIZATION FABRIC ON TOP OF SUBCRADE L 3 1 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE muocu LO T.G EnaNLERs rEI.A. EsoE,M Recei V DEC 112006 of $o p B' JIM17 t Wd oI1 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (tCE) 478 BWr Park RoM BOX 308 VVINblon, V-- t 05495 (802) 879-6331 TIaY MM AV BIRAYa IOl M Npi OW CONc" N APPROVAL SLIDMLSSpN PRELMMNRV APPROVAL SLIDMLSSgN BMAL APPROVAL SLAMMS" CONSTRUCTION —V MGS a M .ub Alq Wc�Plna u Ywl Y •not MtmaM w omMrvcMim >aMn6WLW T�^^�� p�wvoT.ac1 wiu ak abnM`a bm Ymv W 9m BY My eMLM Raw bwmnp I=s1 knB elan Rv) b nvtnv/M�)Mna. nNvwa W No tb wemM.tamw I r ...w M.I. mIw .. -F.. uAO°' a I' w b mvaE BMsvI eE N�c***;,IV Umpvow,I M. alv B. w by th. t 4:2— r N4Wy to mwro TnN -Y cwlaM. Me mwR No. Description Date 0y Revltions \N\\tWIFI 1111111// / \KIN tE OF .DER `HytP eLMr M A, _ • NO. 7A37 CIVIL <NMyxsW�a¢'�� ��ii�NOVAL ESA t� /M/INIIIill1111\\\N Projectnde East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont Sheet me Erosion Control Details Drawing Number: 2006ow-24 Extension, DO Project rnan;ger: RPT Dnrorn, RMP Date:_ 12108/O6 Scale: AS SHOWN Approved `RFC pEC �� VE Qn6 Cityo fso ejr in9ton RECEIVI DEC 11200E City of So. Burlirn )ear Ray & Cathy, ks requested, we have calculated the height of the proposed building based on provisions outlined in Section 3.07 of the SBLDR's, he existing conditions, and the proposed architectural plans. Based on the average Pre -Construction Grade for each of the four ;levations the building will be a maximum of 40.3 feet as measured to the top of the proposed corner parapets. These 2' high >arapets are shown on the submitted elevations and constitute only about 33% of the total facade. The remaining 67% of the wilding will be approximately 2' lower in height or 38.3' above average Pre -Construction Grade. These parapets were provided to enhance the overall aesthetics of the building. The building will have some mechanical units on the roof constituting less than 10% of he total facade. Final selection of these units has not been completed, however these are typically less than 5' high. Therefore, we ;nd up with a requested waiver for height_ pursuant to Section 3.07(F)2) of 43.3' or 8.3' over the 35' max for flat top commercial roof wildinas. The building is to be located on a sloping site and will be filled in the front (west elevation) to minimize the visual impact and improve access to the building and underground parking. The project is not located within any scenic protection areas and meet: he general objectives of the 10 District. 'lease call with any questions. Regards, eremy M. Matosky, P.E., CPESC 'roject Manager / President Crudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) ).0. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road ]Villiston, Vermont 05495 �(802)879-6331 (802)879-0060 ,isit us on the web at www.trudellconsultng.com 1 /2/2007 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DF,PAIrrMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 27, 2006 Jeremy Matosky, PE Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: #SD-06-105 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Matosky: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, January 2, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, r Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 27, 2006 Jeremy Matosky, PE Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: #SD-06-105 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Matosky: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, January 2, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, 1--B I k�)aqj*-\ Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: December 27, 2006 \drb\sub\east_mntnviewt\prelim final Application received: December 11, 2006 1100 HINESBURG ROAD PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-06-105 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-06-106 Agenda # 5 Meeting Date: January 2, 2007 Applicant/Owner East Mountain View LLC Attn. Rand Larson 5399 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Engineer Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road PO Box 308 Williston, VT Location Map Property Information Tax Parcel 0860-01100 Industrial & Open Space District 2.43 acres CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastmntnview\prelim final PROJECT DESCRIPTION East Mountain View, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is preliminary and final plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of a 24,400 sq. ft. 2-story medical office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road. COMMENTS Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on December 11, 2006 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements _10Zoning District Required Proposed ♦ Min. Lot Size_ 3 acres 2.43 acres Max. Density n/a n/a Max. Building Coverage 30% 11.5% Max. Overall Coverage 50% 49.7.0% 4 Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 42 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. 35 ft. Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. >50 ft. Max. Building Height 35 ft. # 4 Front Yard Coverage 30% 25.3% zoning compliance n/a no residential units proposed ♦ pre-existing non-compliance + waiver required # Height of the building is unclear. The height of the building shall be measured from the average pre -construction grade to the top of the roof. The average pre -construction grade has not been submitted and so staff has not been able to evaluate this criterion. The applicant is requesting a front setback waiver of 7'3" for the porte-cochere. The remainder of the building is beyond the front setback. Staff finds this request reasonable as the plans already account for a future widening of the roadway. 1. The Board grants a front setback waiver of 7'3" for the porte-cochere. 2. The port-cochere shall not be converted into an enclosed space without additional approval from the South Burlington Development Review Board. 3. The applicant shall provide staff the average pre -construction grade prior to recording the final plat plans so that the height of the building may be determined. The height of the building shall not exceed 35 feet (the maximum for a flat -roof building) without a waiver from the Development Review Board. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastmntnviewlprelim final SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated December 14, 2006. 4. The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the South Burlington Water Department. The applicant shall adhere to the stipulations of the South Burlington Water Superintendent per the letter dated December 14, 2006. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 5. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater capacity allocation from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to recording of the final plat plans. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The applicant has submitted grading and erosion control plans. The South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent is reviewing the grading and erosion control plans and may have comments prior to the hearing. 6. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via a two-way 24' drive off of Hinesburg Road. The applicant is proposing a 13' one-way drop off lane. Visitors to the site may either utilize the drop off lane and then continue to circulate around the building, or they may drive straight and proceed to the parking in the rear of the building or park underneath. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastmntnview\prelim final The applicant is also proposing an underground parking garage. It appears that there is an entrance and exit at both the north and south sides of the garage. Both access points are proposed to be ingress and egress. The official city map projects a future recreational path or bike lane to be built along the eastern side of Hinesburg Road. The applicant should provide a 20 foot easement to the City of South Burlington, starting from the existing state Right -of -Way of Hinesburg Road. At sketch plan review, the applicant stated that they would provide this easement. However, it is still not shown on the site plan or the survey plat. 7. The applicant shall provide a 20 foot easement along Hinesburg Road to the City of South Burlington. This 20 foot strip may begin at the existing State Right of Way of Hinesburg Road. The plans shall be revised to reflect this. At sketch plan review, staff recommended, and the Board supported, a shared access drive for this property and the lot to the south. This has not been adequately shown on the site plan or the survey plat. 8. The plans shall be revised to depict a shared access drive for the subject property and the property to the south. This shall include a note depicting the access easement. The easement shall also be shown on the survey plat. The South Burlington Fire Department has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated December 28, 2006. 9. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Fire Department per the letter dated December 28, 2006. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, the 24,400 square feet of medical office use is estimated to generate 85 PM peak hour trip ends. 10. The applicant shall pay traffic impact fees based on 85 PM peak hour vehicle trip ends. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The applicant has stated that the subject property does not contain any wetlands, streams, or other unique natural features. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space 10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastmntnview\prelim final approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The open spaces on this property are largely limited to the perimeter of the lot. This should allow for the creation of open spaces between adjoining parcels. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Staff has already stated that the Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided comments. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The applicant is proposing a stormwater retention pond on the property. The resulting amount of impervious surface meets the guidelines for state review and so the project shall be reviewed at the state level. 11. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The City Engineer has reviewed the pans and provided comments in a memo dated December 21, 2006. 12. The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the City Engineer. A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project has been submitted for this proposal, and meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant has submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting on the subject parcel. The proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed development of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastmntnview\prelim final SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The applicant has provided for adequate pedestrian movement to and within the subject lot. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 24,400 SF of Medical Office use shall require 122 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 107 parking spaces. Therefore the applicant is requesting a parking waiver of fifteen (15) spaces, or 12.3%. One (1) of the 107 spaces will not be able to be used on Tuesdays due to trash pickup. This will bring the number of usable spaces to 106 which is a 16 space or 13.1 % shortfall. 13. The Board shall grant the applicant a parking waiver of 16 spaces, or 13.1 %. The applicant shows four spaces marked as handicapped accessible. Five are required. 14. The plans shall be revised to provide for a total of five (5) handicapped accessible parking spaces. The dimensions of the proposed parking spaces meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is depicted on the plans. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. All of the proposed parking is located either below the building or to the rear; therefore this project is in compliance with this criterion. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. Staff has already commented on the height of the building. The applicant shall provide more information so as to determine compliance with this criterion. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastmntnview\prelim final The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has submitted elevations of the proposed building. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has submitted elevations of the proposed building. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff has already addressed the importance of a shared curbcut for this property and the one to the south. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans depict one dumpster with a fenced enclosure. However, staff is concerned about the access to this dumpster which is by the use of two parking spaces. The applicant appears to have considered this by including a note on the plans for a sign that includes no parking for several hours on trash pick-up day. Still, staff would prefer that the dumpster is unobstructed at all times. This has been a standard that the Board has observed for other proposals in the City. 15. The plans shall be revised to remove the two parking spaces in front of the dumpster or otherwise move the dumpster so that it is fully accessible. Landscaping and Screening Requirements Based on the submitted cost projections for this property of $3.2 million, the minimum landscaping budget shall be $39,500. The applicant is proposing $42,096. The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memo dated December 20, 2006. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastmntnview\prelim final 16. The landscaping plan shall be revised per the comments of the City Arborist dated December 20, 2006. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty-eight (28) or more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) feet. Large islands are encouraged. This parking lot contains more than 28 spaces. The site plan appears to show significant islands. However, the applicant shall still specify the percentage of the parking area which is included in these islands. 17. The applicant shall specify the percentage of the parking area which is covered by landscaped islands. This shall be at least 10%. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans do not currently depict a snow storage area. 18. The plans shall be revised to depict adequate snow storage areas. These shall be prepared to the satisfaction of Staff. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. 19. The landscaping plan shall be revised to include any utility cabinets on the site. They shall be effectively screened to the approval of Staff. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Preliminary Plat application #SD- 06-105 and Final Plat application #SD-06-106 subject to the applicant addressing the numbered items in the comments section of this report. Respectfully submitted, Cathyinn La ose, Associate Planner Copy to: Rand Larson, East Mountain View LLC, Owner and Applicant Jeremy Matosky, Trudell Consulting, Contact Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS East Mountain View Hinesburg Road December 21, 2006 1. The parking lot along the east side should have a guard rail or concrete curb because the drop to the stormwater ponds is 6-7 feet. 2. Work within the Hinesburg Road R.O.W. will require a State highway permit. C� C December 14, 2006 Trudell Consulting Engineers Ms. Abigail Lisius P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 RE: 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Lisius: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the most recent set of plans for the above referenced project and offer the following comments for future plan revisions. 1. The current set of final plans for the above referenced project is acceptable to this department relative to all water related activity with the exception of the following: a. Sheet SP 1: The Hinesburg Road water main is a 12" DI pipe, not 8" as shown on the plans. b. This Department shall be notified of any changes to this project with revised, updated hard copy plans for further review. c. The SBWD shall be notified in advance to monitor and inspect the tap for the new water line into this building. d. The SBWD shall be notified in advance to inspect all joints, fittings, appurtenances, thrust blocks, testing, and crossings prior to backfilling. e. Based upon the water allocation request of 1,076 gpd, a water service fee of $1,463.36 shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. This water allocation fee does not include the $800 connection fee or large meter fee (if applicable). All fees must be paid prior to the installation of the water meter. f. Six-inch and smaller DI pipe shall have two brass wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new line shall be six feet (6') to the top of the pipe. DI water pipe shall be Class 52, cement lined. g. Mechanical joint restraints with twist off nuts shall be EBAA or Sigma, or a Department approved equal grip ring. h. Corporations shall be Cambridge Brass No -Lead. Curb stops shall be Cambridge Brass No -lead. All brass unions and adapters shall be Cambridge Brass No -Lead. Note: The Cambridge Brass No -Lead requirement is new language. i. A hard copy set of As-Builts shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the project. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Cathyann Larose Plan Reviews: 1100 Hinesburg Rd 12-06 C C East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Rd Trudell Consulting Engineers 12/20/06 Species Selection: • Reconsider the use of Sugar Maple next to the building. These two trees are planted approximately 10 ft off the building. The mature crown width of Sugar Maple is 40-60 feet and will soon outgrow this planting space • `Adams' crabapples planted 5 ft off the building will also outgrow their space (mature crown width of 20 ft). Should choose a cultivar with a narrower crown • `Molten Lava' crabapple planted in the 6 ft wide strip between the building and the sidewalk will be an ongoing maintenance problem. This tree has a weeping form and reaches a width of 10-12 feet. Shrub planting would be more appropriate in this location Tree Planting Detail • Planting hole size needs to be specified, otherwise the detail is fine General Recommendations • Continuous tree planting pits filled with loam or sandy loam soil are recommended in parking lot islands and bump outs to provide adequate rooting area • Tree locations should be adjusted so that trees are located a minimum of 15 feet from parking lot lights to reduce conflicts between lighting and trees Plan/Key Discrepancies There are a couple of minor discrepancies on the plans that should be addressed: • There are plants on the plan labeled JVC but no corresponding label in the key • There are plants on the plan labeled SC but no corresponding label in the key Soutti, Burlington Fire DepaLment 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief December 28, 2006 Ms. Juli Beth Hines, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Larson Eye Clinic 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the medical office building on Hinesburg Road. I have also met with the representatives from Trudell Consulting about this project. I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Division of Fire Safety codes and standards. 2. Automatic sprinklers and alarm system as required by Vermont Division of Fire Safety. 3. Fire Department Sprinkler Connection location to be specified by SBFD. 4. Fire Alarm panel and enunciator location to be specified by SBFD. 5. Provide 24 hour per day off -site (central station) monitoring of all fire alarm and protection systems. 6. Provide an emergency key box(s), location to be specified by SBFD. 7. If an elevator is proposed the elevator car(s) to be sized large enough to accommodate an ambulance stretcher in the flat position. 8. I would recommend the installation of 1 additional fire hydrant. It would be advantageous to locate it at the end of the new driveway just before the parking lot. 9. Prior to final approval I must review plans and elevation drawings which show actual location of the corridor fire doors and stairwells. 10. Trees, fences and floral outcroppings should be placed so as not to interfere with the deployment of the aerial ladder, hoselines, portable ladders and other firefighting equipment. 11. The overhang (portico) adjacent to the front entrance should be a minimum of 12' clear passage height. C Page - 2 At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which can be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and the Vermont Division of Fire Safety. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. Si� rely, ouglas S. Brent Fire Chief 1-11i�eSivv� 10&/ % 7-A7 to Gc. 47'WdY'4/ Val'/ v 1- Con IC le- 47C cVY�j �C 4G+tA3 76 Y)� _ ✓✓ �G 74 �� o r�G�S �s G 7 �e y e �.-�, 02: ACT 250 NOTICE MINOR APPLICATION 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 On November 29, 2006, Impact Radio, Inc. and Palidor, LLC, filed application #4CO825-3 for a proj- ect generally described as: The installation of Impact Radio, Incas communications facilities on an existing 100ft. communications tower. The installation includes: 1) the removal of an existing top - mounted 20.8 foot antenna with a 17 foot pole to which a 3 bay half -wave antenna will be mount- ed; 2) the installation of a small studio -to -transmitter antenna on the tower at 60 feet AGL; and 3) the installation of an emergency power generator. The Project does not require construction of a new equipment shelter or site lighting. The Project is located on Brownell Mountain in the Town of Williston, Vermont. The District 4 Environmental Commission will review this ap- plication under Act 250 Rule 51- Minor Applications. Copies of the application and proposed permit are available for review at the Williston Municipal Office, Chit- tenden County Regional Planning Commission located at 30 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, and the office listed below. The application and proposed permit may also be viewed on the Natural Resources Board's web site (www.nrb.state, vt.us/lup) by clicking on "District Commission Cases," selecting "Entire Database," and entering the case number above. No hearing will be held unless, on or before Friday, December 29, 2006, a party notifies the District Commission of an issue or issues requiring the presenta- tion of evidence at a hearing or the commission sets the matter for hearing on its own motion. Any hearing request shall be in writing to the address below, shall state the criteria or subcriteria at issue, why a hearing is required and what additional evidence will be presented at the hearing. Any hearing request by an adjoining property owner or other interested person must include a petition for party status. Prior to submitting a request for a hearing, please contact the district coordinator at the telephone number listed below for more information. Prior to convening a hearing, the District Commission must determine that substantive issues requiring a hearing have been raised. Findings of Fact and Cor( )ns of Law will not be prepared`uiaess the Com- mission holds a public hearing. Should a hearing be held on this project and you have a disability for which you are going to need ac- commodation, please notify us by Friday, December 29, 2006. Parties entitled to participate are the Municipality, the Municipal Planning Commission, the Regional Planning Commission, adjoining property owners, other interested persons granted party status pur- suant to 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c). Non-party participants may also be allowed under 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(5). Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this 6th day of December, 2006. By Stephanie H. Monaghan Natural Resources Board District 94 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/ 802-879-5662 E/stephanie.monaghan@state. vt.us PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, January 2, 2007 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application 4SD-06 103 of James & Ann Sorrell and Douglas Lifton for a boundary line adjustment between 9 Adams Ct. & 7 Brownell Way. 2. Preliminary plat application #SD-06-105 & final plat applica- tion #SD-06-106 of East Mountain View, LLC for a planned unit devel- opment consisting of a 24,400 sq. ft. 2-story medical office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Re- view Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. December 13, 2006 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. IN RE: C.S. Vermont Family Court Chittenden County Docket No. 399-8-06 CnJv ORDER FOR SERVICE BY PUBLICA- TION Based upon the motion filed by the States Attorney's Office dated December 4, 2006, and the accom- panying Affidavit, the Court finds that service of process cannot, with due diligence, be made upon Tara Smith, other than by publica- tion. r -- rost tsz browse ads MV6 photos per ad ^-11ine. at your convenience. www.sevendaym.con It is therefore, ORDERED, AD- JUDGED AND DECREED that notice of a merits hearing on the parental fitness of Tara Smith, to be held on Wednesday, January 10, 2007, at 3:00 p.m. at the Family Court of Vermont, Costello Courthouse, 32 Cherry St, Burlington, Vermont, shall be published for two (2) con- secutive weeks in Seven Days, a newspaper of general circulation reasonably calculated to give no- tice to Tara Smith. A copy of this order shall be mailed to Tara Smith if her address can ever be deter- mined. Hon. Brian J. Grearson Family Court Judge Date 12.4.06 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. IN RE: L.L. Vermont Family Court Chittenden County Docket No. 113-3-06 Cnjv NOTICE OF HEARING TO: Brenda Leroux and Daniel Ler- oux, guardians of L.L. On October 6, 2006, the Guardianship of L.L. (designated Docket No. 31-2006 CnPG) was consolidated with the CHINS proceedings in Chittenden Family Court. The State of Vermont has filed a Motion to Terminate the Permanent Guardianship of L.L. You are hereby notified that a hearing to consider the termination of the Permanent Guardianship of L.L. will be held on January 8, 2007 at 2:00 P.M., at the Family Court of Vermont, Chittenden County, 32 Cherry Street, Burlington, Vermont. You are notified to appear in con- nection with this case. Failure to appear at. this hearing will result in the Termination of the Permanent Guardianship to L.L. The State is represented by the Attorney Gen- eral's Office, 32 Cherry Street, Suite 219, Burlington, Vermont 05401. Brian J. Grearson Family Court Judge Date 12-6-06 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, S5. IN RE: C.S. Vermont Family Court Chittenden County Docket No. 399-8-06 CnJv NOTICE OF HEARING TO: Tara Smith, mother of C.S. You are hereby notified that a merits hearing to consider your fitness to act as parent to C.S. will be held on January 10, 2007 at 3:00 p.m, at the Family Court of Vermont, Chittenden County, 32 Cherry Street, Burlington, Ver- mont. You are notified to appear in connection with this case. Hon. Brian J. Grearson Family Court Judge Date 12-4-06 This week's puzzle answers. Puzzles on page 55a. STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. DOCKET NO.S0986-05 CnC Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWALT 2005- J2, Plaintiff V. Susan Morin, Executrix of the Es- tate of Michael R. Morin And Occupants residing at 77 Colchester Point Road, Colches- ter, Vermont, Defendants NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and in execution of the Power of Sale contained in a cer- tain mortgage given by Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Cer- tificateholders of CWALT 2005-J2 to Michael R. Morin dated October 1, 2004 and recorded in Volume 504, Page 3 of the Land Records of the Town of Colchester, of which mortgage the undersigned is the present holder, for breach of the conditions of said mortgage and for the purposes of foreclosing the same will be sold at Public Auc- tion at 10:00 A.M. on January 10, 2007, at 77 Colchester Point Road, Colchester, Vermont all and singu- lar the premises described in said mortgage: To Wit: A parcel of land with dwelling house and other improvements thereon situated on the southerly side of Colchester Point Road, con= sistin9 of 0.5 acres, more or less, with the dwelling house thereon being known and designated as 77 Colchester Point Road, Colchester, Vermont. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Michael R. and Susan Z. Morin by Warranty Deed of Michael R. Morin dated March 21, 1981 and of record at Volume 68, Page 276 of the Town of Colchester Land Records. Reference is made to a Warranty Deed for an easement granted to the Town of Colchester dated April 26, 2001 and of record at Volume 350, Page 584 of said Land Re- cords. Reference is also made to a corrective deed dated April 30, 2002 and of record at Volume 384, Page 618 of said Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above mentioned instrument, to the records thereof and the refer- ences therein contained in further aid of this description. Terms of Sale: $10,000.00 paid in cash by purchaser a time of sale, with the balana at closing. Proof of financin the balance of the purchase i provided at the time of sale. sale is subject to taxes due owing to the Town of Colchest Other terms to be announced a sale or inquire at Lobe & Forti Kimball Ave. Ste. 306 South ington, VT 05403, 802 660-90 Bank of New York, as Trustee By:_/s/Joshua B. Lobe_ Joshua Lobe, Esq. Lobe & Fortin 30 Kimball Ave, Suite 306 South Burlington, VT 05403 DON'T SEE A SUPPORT group h that meets your needs? Call � mont 2-1-1, a program of Unt Way of Vermont. Within Vermo dial 2-1-1 or 866-652-4636 (t( free). or from outside of Vermo 802-652-4636. Monday-Frid 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. SHYNESS AND SOCIAL ANXIE SUPPORT GROUP: Practice new! cial skills and improve confiden in a supportive and professior setting. Contact Celeste Ames the Center for Anxiety Disorde 802-365-3450 ext. 354 or em, shynomoreprogram@yahoo.com. SQUEAKY WHEELS, RUSTY HINGE Focus groups meets at the Branor Pool in St. Albans for socializatio maintaining, wellbeing, improvir performance of daily activities I managing aches through sharir experiences and workout in 0 warm water. Meeting is free, or hourpool pass, swimsuit, requires 732-718-2613. MEN'5 GROUP FORMING: To rea and discuss Warrin FarrilLs grounc breaking best selling book "Th Mythof Male Power". 802-34- 0910. SEPARATED BY ADOPTION?: Con cerned United Birthparents, Inc (CUB) announces local peer sup portgroup meeting in Burlington CUB meetings offer a safe, confi dential, and nurturing environmen to explore personal experience: related to adoption, relinquish ment, search and reunion (or rejec. tion). For those of us who have fet isolated, it is a tremendous retie to communicate with others whc understand our experience. arc Tuesday of the month 6-7 PM. Uni- tarian Universalist Church nn Paarl I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4lo6 December 13, 2006 East Mountain View, LLC c/o Rand Larsen 5399 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, `J "M)*N Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Jeremy Matosky, PE ( �tTY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOk DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 December 12, 2006 Michael Gravelin 4592 Dorset Street Shelburne, VT 05482 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 1 Permit Number SD- CITY OF SOUTH BUF LINGTON APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) East Mountain View, LLC 5399 Williston Road, Williston, VT 05495 p (802) 862-1808 f (802) 862-6664 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 461, pgs. 451-452 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) same as owner 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Jeremy Matosky, PE Trudell Consulting P.O. Box 308, Williston, VT 05495 p (802) 879-6331. f (802) 879-0060 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1100 Hinesburg Road 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 086o-oi ioo 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 2-story, 24,400 sq. ft. medical office building with underground parking. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) building footprint is 12. 200 so. ft. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Building will show two stories in the front and three stories in the rear (two of ce plus one parking). e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): est. 53 employees g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): applicant is requesting a waiver of 15 parking spaces and 7.3'_front setback waiver (from _future ROW front setback) h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc.: no changes to subdivision 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 11.5 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % Proposed 49.7 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % Proposed 25.3 % 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ 42,095 3.2 million c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): included in building cost estimate 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 783 trips b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 85 trips 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: M-F 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: fall 2007 C 14) PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach a separate sheet. see attached sheet 15) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my know Age. /1 Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: [7 Complete ,-2 ❑ Incomplete I wpl! M A, W" of Planning & Zoning or Designee 3 it 4 Date Permit Number SD- - h CITY OF SOUTH BUFLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) East Mountain View, LLC 5399 Williston Road, Williston, VT 05495 p (802) 862-1808 f (802) 862-6664 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 461, ggs. 451-452 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) same as owner 4) CONTACT PERSON (Person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address phone& fax #) Jeremy Matosky, PE TrudeU Consulting Engineers, P.O. Box 308, Williston, VT 05495 p (802) 879-6331 f (802) 879-0060 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 1100 Hinesburg Road 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0860-01100 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) no existing uses b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 2-story, 24,400 sq. ft. medical office building with underground parking c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) building footprint is 12, 200 sq. ft. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Building will show two stories in the front and three stories in the rear (two office plus one parking). e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A I f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) est. 53 employees g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. An shared access easement will be provided for the property to the south, extending approximately 200 feet from the front property line. 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? ito wetlands on the property b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: 2.43 acres-105850 sq. ft. (acres /sq. ft.) b) Building Coverage: Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed 12,200 square feet 11.5 % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 0 square feet 0 % 2 C Proposed 52,643 square feet 49.7 % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed 3,615 square feet 25.3 % 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 105,850 sq. ft. * *Projects disturbing more than on -half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking 15 parking spaces. 7.3'front setback waiver (from future ROW front setback) 12) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $ 3,200,000 b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ 42,095 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) included in building cost estimate 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 61 c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 85 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION M-F 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE -Fall 2007 3 I 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS — please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. see attached sheet 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best ofmyxknowledm Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: /complete ❑ Incomplete of Planning 8c Toning or Designee 4 List of Abutters East Mountain View, LLC 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 860-10700 Michael Gravelin 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 860-01075 Aurthur & Lexi Rye 1075 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 284 C Munson Earth Moving 248 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01020 Burlington Properties, LTD 12270 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) l Report Addressing the Planned Unit Development Criteria of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations The proposed project will consist of a two-story, 24,400 square foot medical office building with basement level parking on a 2.43 acre parcel in South Burlington. The parcel is located at 1100 Hinesburg Road, with access directly across from Fox Run Lane. Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal The project will be served by Champlain Water District and the City of South Burlington municipal wastewater system. Both CWD and the City have already indicated via allocation letters that they have the capacity to accommodate water and wastewater demand from the project. Stormwater Treatment Practices The project is located in the impaired Potash Brook watershed. Upon completion of the project, the impervious cover will exceed one acre and therefore an Individual Stormwater Discharge Permit is required from the State of Vermont. The stormwater collection and treatment system has been designed in accordance with The Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, Volume I — Stormwater Treatment Standards. The five treatment standards will be treated by a combination of a Dry Swale (0-1) and a Micropool Extended Detention Pond (P-1). Grading and Erosion Control During the construction phase, disturbance of the site will exceed one acre and therefore a Construction General Permit is required from the State of Vermont. This Permit requires that an Erosion and Sediment Prevention Control Plan be prepared in accordance with the Low Risk Erosion Control Handbook, and is obtained prior to commencement of construction activities. According to the Detailed Risk Evaluation located in the Appendix of the Erosion Manual, the site can be classified as Low Risk. The project is not located within 100 ft of any rivers or streams, the project does not include disturbance on slopes greater than 15%, and stormwater leaving the construction site will first pass through an established vegetated buffer before entering the receiving water. Access, Circulation, and Traffic Management A single access driveway will serve the site, as well as offer access to the neighboring property to the south. Vehicles will have the option of entering the under -building parking area from the south end, and either continuing toward the one-way exit on the north end or exiting through the south end. Vehicles not parking under the building will continue around toward the back of the building where there is a 77 space open parking area. The parking lot is a loop configuration with width enough for two-way traffic circulation. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) The proposed access driveway is located directly across from Fox Run Lane. There is an exclusive southbound right turn lane on Hinesburg Road into the residential development to the west. No new turn lanes are warranted or proposed on Hinesburg Road at this time. Wetlands, Streams, Wildlife habitat, and Unique Natural Features There are no mapped wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, or other unique natural features located on the 2.43 acre parcel. Visually Compatible The proposed two-story office building will be a high quality building with complimenting landscaping. The building height does not exceed the maximum allowed for this zoning district. Architectural elevations are included in the application package. Open Space Areas. Lot coverage does not exceed the maximum 50% allowed for the Industrial -Open Space district. The lot provides a landscaped front lawn area as well as a landscaped picnic area in the rear. Fire Protection The building will be sprinkled in accordance with "Surgical Center" standards. There is a fire hydrant located on the northwest corner of the property. The building is set approximately 80 feet off Hinesburg road, giving access to the front of the building, there is a 24' driveway on the south side of the building, and a 24' driveway in the parking area to the rear of the building to provide access to fire trucks. Adjacent Properties The property to the north is currently a residential property that is for sale. This neighboring parcel is also located in the Industrial -Open Space district and has potential for commercial use. There are several existing evergreen trees providing a visual buffer between the residence and the proposed project that will be enhanced with the proposed landscaping. The southern and eastern sides of the property are bounded by the same parcel, which is also in the Industrial -Open Space district. Currently, there are several abandoned barn buildings on the parcel. City Specifications Construction procedures and materials for roadways and utilities will be completed in accordance with City of South Burlington Public Works Specifications. Construction details have been prepared for the project and are included in the application package. Goals and Objectives of Comprehensive Plan The Draft Comprehensive Plan states that the Industrial -Open Space District was originally intended to provide land for high -quality, large -lot industries and offices whose buildings and operations are consistent with a location in an environmentally healthy and visually sensitive area adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Recommended actions in the Comprehensive Plan include revising the Land Development Regulations to limit TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 2 land uses within the I-O district to light manufacturing, research and testing facilities, and office uses. Industrial Open -Space District According to the Regulations, the open space and development areas within the Industrial -Open Space District "shall be located so as to maximize the aesthetic values of the property... preserving and enhancing the open character, natural areas, and scenic views, while allowing carefully planned development." The lower 50% maximum density helps enhance the open character of the site. Aesthetic values of the property are maximized with a high quality building design and landscape plan. Maximum building coverage, lot coverage, and front yard coverage are not exceeded. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) PLANT LIST East Mountain View 2006090 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 1218106 PRICE/ SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE COMMENTS PLANT* TOTAL Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' Acer saccharum Forsythia ovata Gleditsia triacanthos 'Imperial' Juniperus chinensis 'Sargenti viridis' Malus 'Adams' Malus 'Molten Lava' Picea abies Pinus mugo mughus Prunus cerasifera x cistena Pyrus calleryana 'Autumn Blaze' Quercus rubra Rhododrendron PJM Spiraea japonica Autumn Blaze Maple 3 21/2"-3" B&B $707.00 $2,121.00 Sugar Maple 4 2"-21/2" B&B $517.50 $2,070.00 Early Forsythia 15 2'-3' CONT. $41.25 $618.75 Imperial Honeylocust 8 21/2"-3" B&B $590.00 $4,720.00 Sargent Green Juniper 74 3 gal. CONT. $44.38 $3,284.12 Adams Crabapple 2 15 gal. B&B $302.50 $605.00 Molten Lava Crabapple 14 7 gal. CONT. $109.00 $1,526.00 Norway Spruce 3 6'-7' B&B $345.00 $1,035.00 Dwarf Mugo Pine 2 18"-24" CONT. $64.50 $129.00 Purple Leaf Sandcherry 12 5 gal. CONT. $66.50 $798.00 Autumn Blaze Callery Pear Red Oak PJM Rhododendron Gold Mound Spirea 8 21 /2 "-3" B&B 10 21/2"-3" B&B 18 5 gal. CONT 16 3 gal. CONT $537.50 $4,300.00 $675.00 $6,750.00 $110.63 $1,991.34 $36.88 $590.08 'Gold Mound' Spiraea vanhouttei Vanhoutte Spirea 31 3 gal. CONT Syringa patula Miss Kim Manchurian 2 30"-36" B&B 'Miss Kim' Lilac Taxus media Everlow Yew 24 18"-24" CONT 'Everlow' Thuja occidentalis nigra Dark American Arborvitae 27 Detention Basin $36.88 $1,143.28 $92.50 $185.00 $66.25 $1,590.00 4'-5' B&B $99.38 $2,683.26 Clethra alnifolia Summersweet Clethra 33 3 gal. CONT. $41.50 $1,369.50 Cornus alba Sibirian Dogwood 80 3 gal. CONT. $38.75 $3,100.00 'Sibirica' Ilex verticillata Common Winterberry 13 2 gal. CONT. $41.25 $536.25 Sambucus canadensis American Elder 20 3 gal. CONT. $47.50 $950.00 TOTAL $42,095.58 * The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. Notes: Job: Type: FORM 10 SQUARE EH/H/HT ARM MOUNT I GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco arm mounted Square Form 10 products are cutoff luminaires for high intensity discharge lamps up to 1000 watts. The EH units are manufactured from mitered extruded aluminum and finished in an Architectural Class 1 anodizing. The H and HT style luminaires are dieformed aluminum with a thermoset polyester finish. Both products can accept one of eight (8) interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems. CUTOFF CLASSIFICATION: Flat glass lens luminaires meet IESNA Full Cutoff criteria. Sag Lens luminaires meet IESNA Cutoff criteria. ORDERING PREFIX CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS EH 14 1 150MH B L P Enter the order code into the appropriate box above. Note: Gardco reserves the right to refuse a configuration. Not all combinations and configurations are valid. Refer to notes below for exclusions and limitations. For questions or concerns, please consult the factory. EH14 14" Square Extruded Luminaire 1 Single Assembly 3@120 Triple at 120' EH19 19" Square Extruded Luminaire 2 Twin Assembly 4 Quad Assembly H14 14" Square Fabricated Luminaire 2@90 Twin Assembly at 90o H19 19" Square Fabricated Luminaire 3 Triple at 90o HT19 19" Tall Square Fabricated Luminaire H26 18" Square Fabricated Luminaire DISTRIBUTION Horizontal Lam C Vertical Lam C 14" 19" T19" 26" 3. Medium base lamp 1 Type I VS Type V 100MH' 25OMH 750PSMH' 1000MH 4. Available with vertical lamp optics only. 5. Operates 55V lamp. 3' Type III In 400w and below, luminaires are supplied 150MH' 40OMH 875PSMH 6. Available with Horizontal optics only. with an acrylic sag lens. A glass sag lens is 175MH 750PSMH' 7. M149 only. Horizontal optics require 4X1z Type IV (197T1gonly) supplied with luminaires above 400w and 20OMH 25OPSMH 750HPS 1000PSMH' MS7501PSIBUIHORBT37 lamp FM' Type IV with 26" luminaires. Medium base, 200w 250MH' 320PSMH max on 14" units. Q' Type V 350PSMH 750HPS FC3V' Full Cutoff Type III 175PSMH° 40OPSMH 1000HPS 1. 19" and T19" luminaires, 400w and below are supplied with flat glass lens standard. For FCVS" Full Cutoff Type V 4501"SMH° wattages above 400w, "XF"flat lens is supplied "19" 320PSMH only. Supplied 100HPS standard. w/MS320/BU/ED28ILLC/PS lamp. 1501-11"S' 250HPS 2. MH/PSMH 400w Type 0 luminaires require Supplied standard with Flat Glass Lens. 400HPS the E28/BT28 reducedjadcet lamp • MH Metal Halide 120 240 347 QUAD PSMH Pulse Start Metal Halide 120120812401277, Factory tied to 277V. HPS High Pressure Sodium 208 277 480 EH and H26 F Fusing In Head CD Clear Drop Diffuser EH Style only BLA Black Anodized LF In-Line/In-Pole Fusing IMF Mast Arm Fitter BRA Bronze Anodized PC Photocontrol and Receptacle MU 10o Uptilt Bracket NA Natural Aluminum Anodized NIA with 480V UB Quick Disconnect for Ballast Tray OC Optional Color Paint PCR Photocontrol Receptacle only AP Adjustable Knuckle - Pole Mount Specify RAL designation ex:OC-RAL7024 POLY Pol carbonate Sa Lens Y 9 Only available with 1 way and 2 @ 1800 mounting SC Special Color Paint In lieu of flat glass. NIA with 4X optics. Specify. Must supply color chip. 450w maximum. AT Adjustable Knuckle - Tenon Mount HMT Stvle HS Internal Houseside Shield Fits 2.3/8" tenon. NIA with 14" units BRP Bronze Paint Supplied standard with FM optics. PTF2 Pole Top Fitter - 2 3/8" - 3" Dia. Tenon QS Quartz Standby BLP Black Paint PTF3 Pole Top Fitter - 3" - 3 1/2" Dia. Tenon OC Optional Color Paint XF Extended Flat Glass Lens PTF4 Pole Top Fitter 3 1 /2" 4" Dia. Tenon ss Flat Glass lens with extended drop. Allows for Specify RAL designation ex: OC-RAL7024 P the use of a larger lamp and still meet IES Full SC Special Color Paint cutoff classification. T19 supplied standard with Specify. Must supply color chip. horizontal lamp optics above 400w. SG Sag Glass Lens in lieu of flat glass Supplied standard with 26" VS 0 Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without Gardco Lighting (800) 227-0758 notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. The 4X optical system 1611 Clovis Barker Road (512) 753-1000 is protected by U.S. patent number 5690422. San Marcos, TX 78666 FAX: (512) 753-7855 LIGHTING © Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001-2006. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. www.sitelighting.com Genlyte Group 79115-43/1006 FORM 10 SQUARE EH/H/HT ARM MOUNT GENERAL: Each Gardco Square Form 10 arm mount is a sharp cutoff luminaire for high intensity discharge lamps. Units are designed with half -cube proportions. Internal components are totally enclosed, rain - tight, dust -tight and corrosion resistant. No venting of optical system or electrical components is required or permitted. Luminaires are completely assembled with no disassembly required for installation. Lamping requires no lifting or hinging of the luminaire housing, disturbing wiring or exposing uninsulated live parts. HOUSING: Extruded housings (EH style) are offered in 14" (35.56 cm) and 19" (48.26 cm) sizes and are composed of precisely mitered anodized aluminum extrusions. Fabricated (H style) units are available in 14" (35.56 cm), 19" (48.26 cm), T19" (48.26 cm) and 26" (66.04 cm) sizes and are one piece, multi -formed aluminum with an integral reinforcing spline and a single concealed joint. Pressure injected silicone provides a continuous weathertight seal at all miters and points of material transition. ARM: Extruded aluminum arm is prewired and secured to fixture by contractor. Assembly is suitable for mounting to pole without requiring access to luminaire. LENS: Mitered, extruded anodized aluminum door frame retains the optically clear, heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass in a sealed manner using hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber. 26" VS Luminaires feature a sag glass lens. In 400w and below, Type VS luminaires are supplied with an acrylic sag lens. A glass sag lens is supplied with Type VS luminaires above 400w. Concealed stainless steel latch and hinge permit easy toolless access to the luminaire. OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented Form 10 optical system is homogeneous sheet aluminum, electrochemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The segmented reflectors are set in faceted arc tube image duplicator patterns to achieve IES Types 1 (1), III (3), IV (FM), and V (Ci - horizontal lamp and VS - vertical lamp) distributions. The mogul lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell with lamp grip - all securely attached to the reflector assembly. 100MH units have medium base lampholder. All Metal Halide units in the 19" and 26" housings have lamp stabilizers ensuring precise arc tube positioning. FINISH: Extruded housings (EH style) are standard with natural, bronze, or black Aluminum Association Architectural Class I anodized finish. Special color polyester finishes are available. Formed housings (H style) are standard with a chromatic acid pretreatment and an epoxy undercoat. The finish coat is a thermosetting polyester baked at 450°F/232°C to achieve an H-2H hardness measure. 26" H style units are also offered with optional Architectural Class I anodized finish. LABELS: All fixtures bear UL or CUL (where applicable) Wet Location labels. I D B -------- C � --Widtthh C C Size Width B 1-2 way 3-4 way D EH14 14" 7" 6" 6" 5" 35.56 cm 17.78 cm 15.24 cm 1524 cm 12.70 cm H14 14" 7" 2" 6" 5" 35.56 cm 17.78 cm 5.08 cm 15.24 cm 12.70 cm EH19 19" 10" 9" 9" 5" 48.26 cm 25.40 cm 22.86 cm 22.86 cm 12.70 cm H19 19" 10" 2" 9" 5" 48.26 cm 25.40 cm 5.08 cm 22.86 cm 12.70 cm T19 19" 12" 2" 9" 5" 48.26 cm 30.48 cm 5.08 cm 22.86 cm 12.70 cm 26 26" 12" 12" 12" 8" 66.04 cm 30.48 cm 30.48 cm 30.48 cm 20.32 cm EPA's Approximate Weight Size Single Twin 3/4 Single Twin Quad ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor ballast is the separate 14 1.1 ft' 2.3 ft' 2.9 ft2 30lbs 60lbs 120lbs component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to .10 ml .21 m= .27 m= 13.61 kg 27.22 kg 54.43 kg -20°F/-29°C. The ballast is mounted on a unitized tray and secured 19 2.1 ft2 4.0 ft' 5.5 ft' 55 Ibs 110 Ibs 220 Ibs within the luminaire, above the reflector system. Component -to- component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of .20 m' .37 m2 .51 m' 24.95 kg 49.90 kg 99.79 kg 65 Ibs 130 Ibs 260 lbs T19 2.2 ft2 4.3 ft2 6.4 ft2 rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 301 °F/150°C or higher. Plug disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC, 15A or higher. .20 m' .40 m° .59 m' 29.48 kg 58.97 kg 117.93 kg 95 Ibs 190 Ibs 380 Ibs 43.09 kg 86.18 kg 172.37 kg 26 3.5 ft .33 m' 7.0 ft' .65 m' 8.9 ft .83 m' Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without Gardco Lighting (800) 227-0758 notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. The 4X optical system is protected by U.S. patent number 5690422. ® Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001-2006. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. Genlyte Group 1611 Clovis Barker Road San Marcos, TX 78666 (512) 753-1000 FAX: (512) 753-7855 www.sitelighting.com LIGHTING 79115-43/1006 APPLICATIONS: Suitable for new construction where insu- lation, if present, is not installed above or within 3" of the fixture. Appropriate for use in both light commercial and residen- tial applications, including office spaces, retail spaces, or kitchens. Utilizes energy efficient compact fluorescent lamps. OPTICS/REFLECTOR: Trims use single spring retention system to fit snug to the ceiling plane, eliminating unwanted light leaks and will not sag over time. Most trims are made of diecost aluminum and reflectors are Alzak® pro- cessed, eliminating the risk of yellowing, cracking or warping. LAMP/SOCKET: Glass filled thermoplastic sockets (accepts G23 or GX23.2 base lamps) mount to socket bracket ensuring proper lamp positioning for consistent appearance and performance. Thermal protector prevents fixture from overheating when improperly installed or over-lamped. Refer to trim for specific lamp information. Lamps furnished by others. BALLAST: Two (2) 7W or 9W (T093) or two (2) 13W (T_94) fluorescent encased and potted ballasts, 120V or 277V. Optional high power factor ballast available. See reverse side for additional ballast informa- tion. Not suitable for field installed emer- gency ballasts. New Construction Universal Horizontal Compact Fluorescent Downlight Non -IC Rated 120V or 277V INSTALLATION: Self -aligning bar hangers with integral forked nailing prongs allow for nail -less installation. Locking T-bar notch accommo- dates T-bar ceiling and expands to 27" for 24" joist spacing. HOUSING: Unique square shape allows for greater lamp adjustability and the ability to accommodate a variety of trim types and lamp sources, such as incandescent and compact fluorescent. 22 ga. C.R.S. hous- ing. Two (2) 22 ga. snap -on covers pro- vide easy access to splices. LABELS: U.L. approved for all ceiling types. Insula- tion if present, must not be on top of hous- ing and be spaced 3" away from housing side. U.L. listed for damp locations and through wiring. U.L. listed for wet loca- tions when used with lensed (TL) trims. CSA certified. Thermally protected. N.Y. City approved. J-BOX: Prewired 18 ga. galvanized steel junction box with preinstalled ground wire and integral Romex connector. J-box is acces- sible from below ceiling through remov- able housing end panel. Rated for through wiring. DATE: TYPE: FIRM NAME: PROJECT: Aperture: Nominal 6" Ceiling Cutout: 63/4" Maximum Ceiling Thickness: 1'/2" Width: 7Y2" For conversion to millimeters, multiply inches by 25.4 Not to Scale r-- ttvz" � 27" max. 7%" OPEN I� s° 1 27" max. ---- 7_1,„ WALL WASH HOUSING TRIMS TRIMS TRIMS ACCESSORIES ACCESSORIES ❑ PBX BAFFLE LENSED OPEN ❑ TB94 120V ❑ TL94-30 120V ❑ T093S 120V ❑ TB94 277V ❑ TL94-30 277V ❑ T093S 277V ❑ TL94-85 120V ❑ T0940 120V ❑ TL94-85 277V ❑ T094G 277V ❑ TL94-86 120V ❑ T094S 120V ❑ TL94-86 277V ❑ T094S 277V ❑ TL94-87 120V WALL WASH ❑ TL94-87 277V ❑ TW94C 120V ❑ TW94C 277V ❑ TW940 120V ❑ TW94G 277V rescolite SINCE 2944 An Affiliate of Hubbell Lighting, Inc. ❑ HPF7L1 High power factor ballast for T093 trims. ❑ HPF130 High power factor ballast for T 94 trims. ❑ MGR Metal "goof" rings. White metal trim ring covers oversized ceiling cutout. Specify outside dimension and trim catalog number. ❑ PKT301 T-bar clips In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not alter the function of the product. Web: www.prescolite.com • Tech Support: (888) 777-4832 Cl SCA7 Sloped ceiling adaptor for LiteBox trims. Specify degree of slope and ceiling type. Not recommended for wall wash (TW) trims. Sloped ceiling adaptor and housing must be installed at the same time. ❑ TCA1 Thick ceiling adaptor allows for use of LiteBox trims in ceilings 1 Y2" to 21/2" thick. Install prior to housing installation. LB-CFL-001 � TRIMS & FINISH I LiteBox° - PBX Compact Fluorescent BALLAST DATA BALLAST DATA Normal Power Factor Fixture Data (standard) High Power Factor Conversion Ballast Data (optional) Trim Catalog Number Ballast Factor Amps Watts Trim Catalog Number Ballast Factor Amps Watts T093S 120V .95 .18 11 T093S 120V .94 .09 10 T093S 277V .10 .18 12 T093S 277V .95 .05 13 T_94120V 1.0 .40 18 T_94120V .95 .13 15 T_94 277V .91 .10 27 T_94 277V .95 .17 34 Baffle Lensed Open Wall Wash Wet Location Approved TB94 120V TL94-30 120V T093S 120V TW94 (C) (G) 120V TB94 277V TL94-30 277V T093S 277V TW94 (C) (G) 277V Clear Alzak® specular reflector Drop opal Lexan° lense with upper Clear Alzak specular reflector. Clear (C) or gold (G) Alzak wall with lower black baffle. reflector. Max. (2) 7W or 9W low wattage C.F.L. wash reflector. Max. (2) 13W quad tube C.F.L. Max. (2) 13W quad tube C.F.L. Max. (2) 13W quad tube C.F.L. TL94-85 120V T094 (S) (G) 120V TL94-85 277V T094 (S) (G) 277V Black baffle with fresnel lense and Clear (S) or gold (G) Alzak specular upper reflector. reflector. Max. (2) 13W quad tube C.F.L. Max. (2) 13W quad tube C.F.L. <ca TL94-86 120V TL94-86 277V Black baffle with drop opal lense and upper reflector. Max. (2) 13W quad tube C.F.L. TL94-87 120V TL94-87 277V Black baffle with textured opal glass lens and upper reflector. Max. (2) 13W quad tube C.F.L. Web www.prescolite.com • Tech Support: (888) 777-4832 rescolite an aff 101 Corporate Drive, Suite L • Spartanburg, SC 29303 U S A. • Phone (864) 599-6000 P—colite is lmte of Hubbell Lighting, Inc, withrep—entat— offices throughout North Arn-- Copyright ©2003 Prescolite, All Righh Reserved • Specifications ,ublect to change without notice. • Printed in US.A. • LBLFL-001 • 4103 ® Hubbell Lighting, Inc. Notes: Job: Type: BOLLARD BRM824/825/827 BEVELED TOP LOUVER GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Gardco's bevel top Louver Bollard provides uniform illumination, superior spacings and solid vandal resistance. Rugged extruded and cast construction with silicone seals and gasketing assure years of trouble -free service. The BRM824 is a complete assembly with an extruded aluminum base. The BRM825 head only unit affixes to custom architectural elements. The BRM827 series includes a concrete base assembly. Each luminaire utilizes 35W through 10OW high intensity discharge or 32w triple -tube compact PREFIX HEIGHT WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS BRM824 42 50MH BRP Enter the order code into the appropriate box above. Note: Gardco reserves the right to refuse a configuration. Not all combinations and configurations are valid. Refer to notes below for exclusions and limitations. For questions or concerns, please consult the factory. BRM824 with Extruded Aluminum Base BRM825 Head Only BRM827 with Natural Concrete Base BRM827B with Beige Concrete Base BRM827G with Grey Concrete Base 42" 36" 30" 1 V. 42" 42" 42" 50MH' 35HPS2 32TRF3 INC2 120 70MH 50HPS' 100w maximum A19 208 10OMH 70HPS 240 100HPS MH Metal Halide HPS High Pressure Sodium 277 INC Incandescent 1, 1201277V Primary only. 2. 120V Primary only. 3. 32TRF type features an electronic fluores- cent ballast that accepts 120V through 277V, 50hz or 60hz input. 0°F starting temperature. BRP Bronze Paint OC Optional Color Paint BLP Black Paint svwI. ;crass n m1- S� cam. WP White Paint OC-PAL7024 NP Natural Aluminum Paint SC Special Color Paint VP Verde Green Paint F Fusing SHD Internal 180' Shield DUP Duplex Receptacle WE-Elt�, fluiHrarted in ]aEr laEam GFCI GFCI Receptacle wArarlit, fuhnc� in 1� lnsirg Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without Gardco Lighting 800/227-0758 notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. 2661 Alvarado Street 510/357-6900 in California Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001-2004, All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. San Leandro, CA 94577 Fax: 510/357-3088 A Genlyte Company www.sitelighting.com 79115-121/0604 BOLLARD BRM824/825/827 BEVELED TOP LOUVER UPPER HOUSING: Diecast aluminum bevel top secures to one-piece louvered casting with three (3) concealed tamper resistant screws. LOWER HOUSING: BRM824 Luminaire features a cylindrical .125 wall 6063-T5 extruded aluminum base housing. Bottom section has a welded -in cast ring for attachment to base assembly with four (4) hex head set screws. BRM825 Louver head assembly is affixed to ballast mounting bracket which is suitable for insertion into architectural elements (by others). BRM827 Luminaire includes a pre -cast concrete base constructed with steel molds and wire reinforcing. Base is acid -etched to provide a smooth textured aggregate finish. OPTICAL SYSTEM: Louvers are angled to provide maximum spacings while shielding the source to 90°. Upper louver features a concealed hammertoned anodized aluminum reflector to increase luminaire efficiency and generate unstriated beam patterns. A fully gasketed Pyrex vessel enshrouds the lamp envelope and is secured with a stainless steel spring. SOCKET: Medium base pulse -rated lampholder is glazed porcelain with nickel plated reinforced screw shell and spring loaded contact. ANCHORAGE: BRM824 Base assembly consists of a cast aluminum platform and ballast mounting bracket. Assembly is secured and leveled to the mounting foundation with four (4) 3/8" X 8" x 1 1/2" anchor bolts on a 4 3/4" bolt circle. Ballast is prewired with quick electrical disconnects and mounting bracket is secured with two (2) Phillips head screws for ease of installation and servicing. BRM824 BRM825 BRM827 4 3/4" Bolt Circle 0 a' Con it Og ,I,g Stub -up projection 3" max Bolt projection 1 1/2" + 1/4" BRM825 Mounting plate is cast aluminum with slots to accept anchor bolts (by others) at 90° on a 6 1/4" diameter bolt circle. A 4 1/2" diameter opening is required to house ballast assembly. BRM827 Base assembly consists of four (4) galvanized steel base tabs fastened to pre -cast concrete base. Assembly is secured and leveled to the mounting foundation with four (4) 3/8" X 8" X 1 1/2" anchor bolts on a 91/2" bolt circle. Base is designed for 5" direct burial ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -20° F. Component -to - component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 150°C or higher. Plug disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC, 15A or higher. All fluorescent luminaires utilize electronic ballasts that are high power factor and designed for reliable lamp starting to 0°F. Smart fluorescent ballasts accept 32w in all voltages from 120 to 277, 50/60Hz. Sockets are high temperature PBT with brass contacts. LUMINAIRE FINISH: Each luminaire receives a fade and abrasion resistant, electrostatically applied, thermally cured textured powdercoat finish LABELS: All fixtures bear UL or CUL (where applicable) Wet Location labels. Grade 9 112" Bolt Circle 4) 3/8" anchor bolts Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. © Copyright Gamco Lighting 2001-2004. All Rights Reserved, International Copyright Secured, A Genlyte Company NOTE: Factory supplied template must be used when setting anchor bolts. Gardco Lighting will not honor any claim for incorrect anchorage placement from failure to use factory supplied templates. Gardco Lighting 800/227-0758 2661 Alvarado Street 510/357-6900 in California San Leandro, CA 94577 Fax: 510/357-3088 www.sitelighting.com 79115-121/0604 Notes: Job: Type: 100 LINE 101 PERFORMANCE SCONCE The Gardco 101 Trapezoidal Wedge high performance sconce offers an excellent alternative to unsightly wall mounted fixtures. These architecturally refined luminaires are designed to integrate naturally to wall surfaces. The 101 luminaires are available with three (3) different distribution patterns - a wide throw, a medium throw and a forward throw. Each luminaire is designed to accept HID sources up to 175MH, and Compact Fluorescent sources up to 42 watt. Housings are sealed throughout, completely excluding moisture, dust, insects and contaminants. PREFIX DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS 101 WT 10OMH H BLP Enter the order code into the appropriate box above. Note: Gardco reserves the right to refuse a configuration. Not all combinations and configurations are valid. Refer to notes below for exclusions and limitations. For questions or concerns, please consult the factory. 101 Trapezoidal Wedge Refer to conffiguration chart below for FT Forward Throw Not Available with Fluorescent Lamps available combinations 101 EM Emergency Sconce WT Wide Throw Not Available with Fluorescent Lamps 101 EMC Emergency Sconce Cold Temperature MT Medium Throw 101EMR Remote Emergency Sconce LAMPNOLTAGE CHART - 101 Voltage: 1120 1208 1240 1277 1347 1480 150MH • 35HPS • 50HPS • • 70HPS • • • • • • 100HPS • • • • • • 150HPS • • • • • 50CMHE' UNIV 70CMHEI UNIV 100CMHEI UNIV Fluorescent 260F UNIV • 2260F' UNIV • 32TRF' UNIV • 42TRF UNIV • 232TRF' UNIV • 242TRF' UNIV • BRP Bronze Paint BLP Black Paint WP White Paint NP Natural Aluminum Paint BGP Beige Paint OC Optional Color Paint Specify RAL designation ex: OC-RAL7024 SC Special Color Paint Specify. Must supply color chip CONFIGURATION CHART - 101 EM or 101 EMC Distribution VoltaGe T WT MT 120 208 240 277 347 480 Fluorescent 2260F • 11 • • 42TRF • • • CONFIGURATION CHART - 101 EMR Distribution Voltage Combinations marked with a dot are available for ordering. MH - Metal Halide CMHE - Ceramic Metal Halide with Electronic Ballast HPS - High Pressure Sodium OF - Quad Fluorescent TRF - Triple Tube Fluorescent 1. Fluorescent and CMHE luminaires feature electronic ballasts that accept 120V through 277V, 50hz to 260hz, input. Specify "UNIV" voltage for 120V through 277V F Fusing 120V through 277V only WLU Wet Location Door for Inverted Mount N/A with WG option PCB Button Type Photocontrol n/a w1480V WS Wall Mounted Box for Surface Conduit Rear entry permitted OS Quartz Standby WS/UT WS Option w/5° Uptilt Rear entry permitted HID only, N/A with CMHE Ballasts WG Wire Guard Not available with WLU option or in 480V 100w Quartz maximum. POLY Polycarbonate Sag Lens 100w HID maximum 0924 Quartz Emergency wT optic only. 150w HID maximum. EMR Luminaires Only: loow Quartz maximum B30* Bodine Remote Emergency Pack 012V Quartz 12V Emergency Full Light Output in emergency mode WT Optic only. 150w HID maximum. B84CG* Bodine Emergency Battery Pack 100w Quartz maximum B94C-CAN* Bodine Remote Emergency Pack - Canada SL Solite® Diffusing Lens UT 5° Uptilt 'Emergency Battery Packs for EMR types MUST be ordered no_ with luminaires and supplied by Gardco. Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. Solite is a Registered Trademark of AFG Industries. © Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001-2006. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. Gardco Lighting (800) 227-0758 1611 Clovis Barker Road (512) 753-1000 San Marcos, TX 78666 FAX: (512) 753-7855 www.sitelighting.com A Genlyte Company 79115-124/706 100 LINE 101 PERFORMANCE SCONCE GENERAL: Each Gardco 101 luminaire is a wall mounted cutoff luminaire for high intensity discharge or compact fluorescent lamps. Internal components are totally enclosed in a rain -tight, dust -tight and corrosion resistant housing. The housing, back plate and door frame are diecast aluminum. A choice of three (3) optical systems is available. Luminaires are suitable for wet locations (damp locations if inverted). HOUSING: Single -piece soft trapezoidal housings are diecast aluminum. A memory retentive gasket seals the housing with the doorframe to exclude moisture, dust, insects and pollutants from the optical system. A black, diecast ribbed backplate dissipates heat for longer lamp and ballast life. DOOR FRAME: A single -piece diecast aluminum door frame integrates to the housing form. The door frame is hinged closed and secured to the housing with two (2) captive stainless steel fasteners. The heat and impact resistant 1/8" (.32cm) tempered glass lens and one-piece gasket are mechanically secured to the door frame with four (4) galvanized steel retainers. OPTICAL SYSTEMS: Reflectors are composed of specular extruded and faceted components, electropolished, anodized and sealed. Reflector segments are set in arc tube image duplicating patterns to achieve the wide throw, forward throw or medium throw downlight distributions. ELECTRICAL: Standard Luminaires: Each high power factor HID core and coil ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to-20oF/-29'C. Component -to -component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 150°C or higher. Plug disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC,15A or higher. Standard fluorescent units have a starting temperature of 0°F/-18°C. Standard fluorescent ballasts are high power factor electronic solid state. 7" 17.78 cm 41 28 cm 22.86 cm EM and EMC Luminaires: In the event of power interruption, integral battery pack will power (1) 42W or (2) 26W compact fluorescent lamps at reduced light levels for a minimum of 90 minutes. Maintenance free battery is rated for ambient temperatures down to 32°F/0°C (EM) or 0°F/-18°C (EMC). Indicator light is visible through the lens. A test switch is accessible through the door assembly. EM and EMC units do not bear CUL label. EMR Luminaires: A 7.572.29m, 12 wire, quick disconnect assembly is provided for wiring through conduit (by others) to a Bodine B30, B84CG or B94C-CAN fluorescent emergency battery pack. The fluorescent emergency battery pack MUST be supplied by Gardco. The B30, B84CG or B94C-CAN option is required to be on the order to the factory. In the event of power interruption, the B30 remote battery pack will power (1) 42W or (2) 26W compact fluorescent lamps at full light levels; the remote battery pack (B84CG or B94C-CAN) will power (1) 42W or (1) 26W compact fluorescent lamp at reduced light levels; for a minimum of 90 minutes (1330 or B84CG) or 30 minutes (B94C-CAN). Maintenance free battery is rated for ambient temperatures down to 32°F/0°C. Minimum luminaire starting temperature is 0°F/-18°C. Indicator light is visible through the lens. A test switch is accessible through the door assembly. NOTE: B30 and B84CG do not bear CUL label. LAMPHOLDER: Pulse rated medium base sockets are glazed porcelain with nickel plated screw shell. Fluorescent sockets are high temperature PBT with brass contacts. FINISH: Each standard color luminaire receives a fade and abrasion resistant, electrostatically applied, thermally cured, triglycidal isocyanurate (TGIC) textured polyester powdercoat finish. Standard colors include bronze (BRP), black (BLP), white (WP), natural aluminum (NP) and beige (BGP). Consult factory for specs on custom colors. LABELS: All fixtures bear UL or CUL (where applicable) labels, except as noted. Lens down application is Wet Location and lens up is Damp Location, except when using the optional inverted Wet Location components. Mounting Plate IF 45/16" --]1.I 0 10.96 cm 1 3/4" dia. 3" 4.4 cm 7.6y2 cm 0 O� Mounting Bolt Pattern Note: Mounting plate center is located in the center of the luminaire width and 3.5"(8.89cm) above the luminaire bottom (lens down position). Splices must be made in the J-box (by others). Mounting plate must be secured by max. 5/16" (.79cm) diameter bolts (by others) structurally to the wall. Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without Gardco Lighting (800) 227-0758 notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. Solite is a Registered 1611 Clovis Barker Road (512) 753-1000 Trademark of AFG Industries. San Marcos, TX 78666 FAX: (512) 753-7855 © Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001-2006. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. www.sitelighting.com A Genlyte Company i-, LIGHTING 79115-124/0706 (7 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) December 11, 2006 Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Ray: tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com On behalf of East Mountain View, LLC, Trudell Consulting Engineers is submitting the enclosed Preliminary and Final Plat Applications for a project known as East Mountain View, located at 1100 Hinesburg Road. The proposed project consists of a two-story, 22,400 square foot medical office building with basement level parking. The project will be served by municipal water and sewer. Enclosed are five full-size copies of the site plan package, one reduced set, the applications and supporting documentation, and the application fee checks for $510 each. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, TR ELJC7nIENGINEERS, Abigail ius Encl. Preliminary & Final Plat Application Site Plan Package & Building Elevations Lighting Specifications Plant Schedule PUD Report CC. Rand Larson P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting f f SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 October 5, 2006 East Mountain View LLC Attn: Rand Larson 5399 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: DRB Minutes - 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Dr. Larson: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved minutes from the September 5, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, '��N Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Uoo Q . SOUTH(L JRLINGTON DEVELOPMENT RE, IEW BOARD 5 SEPTEMBER 2006 -PIC Mr. Wells referred to pictures of the existing structure. He noted that the structure was put in when it was allowed to be put on the property line; the regulations have now changed so there is a required 5-foot setback. Mr. Dinklage asked why the addition can't be built to meet the setbacks. Mr. Wells said it would create an irregular roof line which could cause a water leakage problem. He said he wasn't aware of the new regulations when he built the addition. Mr. Dinklage noted that building anything in the city requires a permit. He asked if the existing structure could be moved 3 feet to be within the setback. Mr. Wells said he wasn't sure it would be able to be moved because of its age. Ms. Lovett, a neighbor, said she opposes granting the variance. She noted that the fence is not straight and there is no way he can maintain it without trespassing on her property. She also said the addition to the building is unpainted and is unpleasant to look at from her home. Mr. Wells said he didn't paint it because he was told of the violation the day he completed the work on the building. Mr. Dinklage explained the nature of a variance and the necessity of meeting all of the 5 criteria. He said it is very hard to get approval for a variance. Mr. Dinklage also reminded the public that any time there is a significant change to a property, people should consult the Administrative Officer to see if a permit is needed. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Variance Application #VR-06-01 of George & Ruth Wells subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. The vote on the motion was 0-7, and the motion was deemed to have been denied. 8. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-71 of East Mountain View, LLC, for a planned unit development to construct a 2-story 21,600 sq. ft. building consisting of 13,000 sq. ft. of medical office use and 8,600 sq. ft. of general office use, 1100 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Dinklage noted a request from staff for a shared access with the property to the south. Mr. Ribosky noted that property extends all the way to Meadowlands and already has an access. Mr. Larson said the business that would be using this building is now located in Williston in a very difficult traffic situation. They have many patients who are elderly and have vision problems. They are trying to bring the business to South Burlington. Mr. Larson felt the shared access would have an impact on patients turning in with cars coming at them. He did not want to see all that traffic funneled through this property. Mr. Dinklage said that multiple curb cuts could be far more confusing to challenged drivers. He noted that if there is a lot of traffic at that intersection, there could be a traffic light. He noted that the Board is only asking for the dedication of an easement; if the other development and this applicant feels it may be, they might have a different traffic pattern altogether. He also reminded the applicants that a full interchange is in the plans -3- SOUTH jRLINGTON DEVELOPMENT RE . tEW BOARD 5 SEPTEMBER 2006 for the area, and it could become a very busy place. In addition, a by-pass from Shelburne Road has been looked for, and if a way can be found to connect lower Shelburne Road to Hinesburg Road, it will change the whole character of the area. Mr. Plumeau noted there is extreme excessive speed on Hinesburg Road, and this project is talking about 61 peak hour trip ends. He felt that consolidating accesses is not just a good idea, it is essential. He suggested this property look for an access not on Hinesburg Road or at least one with a controlled access. Mr. Lyman said he lives in that area and every day he is almost clipped getting onto the road. Members all supported the shared access easement. Mr. Behr said he would also support accessing the whole property from Meadowland Drive. The proposed building would be 22,000 sq. ft., 2 stories, with underground parking. The building would have multiple accesses. There would be an elevator as well. Storm water management would be located in the back. There will be good screening along the Gravelin property. A full landscaping plan will be provided at preliminary. Ms. LaRose asked about an easement for the rec path. Mr. Dinklage said it would be outside of the right-of-way. No other issues were raised. 9. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-73 of Rye Associates to resubdivide two parcels of 15.6 acres and 10.2 acres into two lots of 5.7 acres (lot #1) and 18.3 acres (lot #2), and a right-of-way for a proposed City street (1.9 acres), 1061 and 1075 Hiensburg Road: Mr. O'Leary said they are proposing a simple 2-lot subdivision. The southern lot is now 10.2 acres and the northern lot 15.6 acres. Swift Street Extension goes through the lots. The lots they would create would be 5.7 acres to the north and 18.3 acres to the south. They will create a right-of-way to line up with Meadowland Drive. Mr. Plumeau asked about access control, noting that this property was similar to the previous situation. Mr. Dinklage said that impact fees could be used to put in a traffic light. Mr. O'Leary said that they might shift the right-of-way slightly to accommodate a request from the Ryes. A member of the audience asked if anything was going to be built on the lots. Mr. Dinklage said the property to the north is zoned Industrial, and the property to the south is zoned Residential, so there will probably be something built there at some time. He added that any development plan would have to come to the DRB. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 31, 2006 East Mountain View, LLC Attn: Rand Larson 5399 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Larson: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, September 5t", at 7:30 p.m. PLEASE NOTE that the location of the meeting has changed. It will be held at South Burlington High School, 550 Dorset Street, in Cafeteria 2. .Enter at the main entrance off Dorset Street and look for signs pointing you to the cafeteria. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, a1EHr t Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 . ugust 24, 2006 0(b East Mountain View, LLC Attn: Rand Larson 5399 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for the September 5, 2006 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, C Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTUN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 August 23, 2006 Michael Gravelin 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the September 5, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts your property. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, 7�-* Betsy Donough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 August 23, 2006 Arthur & Lexi Rye 1075 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the September 5, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts your property. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. . Sincerely, � h Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGT0N DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 August 23, 2006 Munson Earth Moving 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the September 5, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts your property. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, c� h Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 August 23, 2006 Burlington Properties, LTD 1020 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the September 5, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts your property. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the call this office at 846-4106, stop by durin scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, -b& Betsy cDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. g proposed development, you may regular office hours, or attend the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: August 31, 2006 \drb\sub\east_mntnviewt\sketch_bidg Application received: July 24, 2006 II 1100 HINESBUR.G ROAD II SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-06-71 Agenda # 8 Meeting Date: September 5, 2006so Applicant✓Owner 4CCOY East Mountain View LLC Attn. Rand Larson 5399 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Engineer Property Information Trudell Consulting Engineers Tax Parcel 0860-01100 478 Blair Park Road PO Box 308 Industrial & Open Space District Williston, VT 2.43 acres Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastm ntnview\sketch East Mountain View, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking sketch plan review for a planned unit development to construct a 2-story 21,600 sq. ft. building consisting of 13,000 sq. ft. of medical office use and 8,600 sq. ft. of general office use, 1100 Hinesburg Road. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on July 24, 2006 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements _ 10 Zoning District Required Proposed ♦ Min. Lot Size 3 acres 2.43 acres Max. Density n/a n/a Max. Building Coverage 30% 10.2% Max. Overall Coverage 50% 41.0% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. 35 ft. Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. >50 ft. Max. Building Height 35 ft. <35 ft. Front Yard Coverage 30% 9.8% zoning compliance n/a no residential units proposed ♦ pre-existing non-compliance SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastmntnview\sketch 1. The South Burlington Water Department should review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 2. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater capacity allocation from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to recording of the final plat plans. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The applicant has not yet submitted grading and erosion control plans. 3. The applicant shall submit grading and erosion control plans as part of preliminary plat application. 4. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via a two-way 24' drive off of Hinesburg Road. The applicant is proposing a 12' one-way drop off lane. As the property is proposed to be used for medical office, this is appropriate and staff has no issues with it. Visitors to the site may either utilize the drop off lane and then continue to circulate around the building, or they may drive straight and proceed to the parking in the rear of the building or park underneath. The applicant is also proposing an underground parking garage. It appears that there is an entrance and exit at both the north and south sides of the garage. The applicant should clarify whether or not both access points are proposed to be ingress and egress, or if they are unidirectional. 5. The site plan shall be revised to clarify the ingress and egress points of the underground parking. The official city map projects a future recreational path or bike lane to be built along the eastern side of Hinesburg Road. The applicant should provide a 20 foot easement to the City of South Burlington, starting from the existing state Right -of -Way of Hinesburg Road. 6. The applicant shall provide a 20 foot easement along Hinesburg Road to the City of South Burlington. This 20 foot strip may begin at the existing State Right of Way of Hinesburg Road. 7. The South Burlington Fire Department shall review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastm ntnview\sketch According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, the 13,000 square feet of medical office use is estimated to generate 48.36 PM peak hour trip ends. The 8,600 square feet of general office use is estimated to generate 12.81 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Thus, the total project is estimated to generate 61.17 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property does not appear to contain any wetlands, streams, or other unique natural features. The applicant should clarify this and provide wetlands delineation as part of preliminary plat review. If no wetlands exist, the applicant should submit a statement from a licensed engineer or other qualified professional stating so. 8. The applicant should clarify this and provide wetlands delineation as part of preliminary plat review. If no wetlands exist, the applicant should submit a statement from a licensed engineer or other qualified professional stating so. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space 10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The open spaces on this property are largely limited to the perimeter of the lot. This should allow for the creation of open spaces between adjoining parcels. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Staff has already stated that the Fire Chief shall review the plans. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\sub\eastm ntnvi ew\s ketch The applicant is proposing a stormwater retention pond on the property. If the amount of impervious surface does not meet the guidelines for state review, staff recommends that the City's Stormwater Superintendent review the plans. 9. The applicant should clarify the size of the stormwater retention pond on the property and whether or not it shall require state review. If necessary, the City's Stormwater staff shall review the details of the pond and related stormwater mitigation measures. 10. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The City Engineer shall review the details for the access drive when details are available during preliminary plat review. 11. The City Engineer shall review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project shall be submitted for this proposal, and shall meet the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant should submit exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting on the subject parcel. The proposed lighting fixtures shall be in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. 12. The applicant shall submit plans showing proposed lighting locations and details (cut -sheets) as part of the preliminary plat application. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed development of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The applicant has provided for adequate pedestrian movement to and within the subject lot. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastm ntnview\sketch According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 13,000 SF of Medical Office use shall require 65 parking spaces. The 8,600 SF of general office use shall require 30.1 parking spaces. Therefore, the development will require 96 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 95 parking spaces. Therefore the applicant is requesting a parking waiver of one (1) space, or 1 %. 13. The Board shall grant the applicant a parking waiver of 1 space, or 1 The applicant shows four spaces marked as handicapped accessible. Four are required. The dimensions of the proposed parking spaces appear to meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is not depicted on the plans. 14. The plans shall be revised to depict a bicycle rack as part of the preliminary plat application. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. All of the proposed parking is located either below the building or to the rear; therefore this project is in compliance with this criterion. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The applicant has stated that the maximum height of the proposed two-story building will not exceed 35 feet, which is in compliance with the Land development Regulations. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed building. 15. The applicant shall submit elevations of the proposed building as part of the preliminary plat application. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed building. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastm ntnview\sketch In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not foresee the need to provide additional access to abutting properties. The layout of the area is such that all adjacent properties already have sufficient access. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not currently depict any outside trash facilities. If the applicant is planning outside storage on the property, these shall be shown on the plans and shall be appropriately enclosed and screened. 16. The plans shall be revised to depict outside trash storage facilities. Such facilities shall be adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements The applicant has not yet submitted cost projections for this property. The applicant has not submitted landscaping plans for the property. 17. The applicant shall submit building costs as part of the preliminary plat application 18. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan for the subject property, prepared in accordance with Section 13.06 of the SBLDR, as part of the preliminary plat application. 19. The applicant shall submit a landscaping budget for the subject property, in compliance with Table 13-9 of the SBLDR, as part of the preliminary plat application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty-eight (28) or more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) feet. Large islands are encouraged. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\eastm ntnview\sketch This parking lot contains more than 28 spaces. The site plan appears to show significant islands. However, the applicant shall still specify the percentage of the parking area which is included in these islands. 20. The applicant shall specify the percentage of the parking area which is covered by landscaped islands. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans do not currently depict a snow storage area. 21. The plans shall be revised to depict adequate snow storage areas as part of preliminary plat application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. 22. The landscaping plan shall include any utility cabinets on the site. They shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board prior to final plat approval. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document before continuing on to preliminary plat submission. Respectfully submitted, 4atan'n aRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Rand Larson, East Mountain View LLC, Owner and Applicant 0 GENERAL NOTES ZONING NOTES PARKING 1. THE LOCA]TONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN 1) OMER OF RECORD: PROPOSED RFOUIREO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. THE EAST MOUNTAIN NEW, LLC MEDICAL OFFICE 65 IAOOO FT2- 5.0 SPACES/f000 FT2 - 65 SPACES CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL ATTN: RAND LARSON GENERAL OFFICE -m 8,600 FT2. 3.5 SPACES/f000 F72 - 30 SPACES EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE 5399 WILLISTON ROAD WILLISTON, VT 05495 TOTAL SPACES ACCESSIBLE 95 4 4 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT 'DIG SAFE' AT 1-800-225-4977 TO LOCATE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEFORE 2) LOT SIZE: 2.43 ACRES (USING EXISTING HINESBURG ROAD R.O.W.) LOT COVERAGE: EXCAVATION BEGINS THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN UTILITIES AS SHOWN J) ZONING DISTRICT I-O, INDUSTRIAL -OPEN SPACE BUILDING: PROPOSEDRFry tiler . fO,BOO 50FT. OR 10.21G JD.OIf AND AS FOUND. 4) TAX MAP NUMBER: MAP 48, PARCEL 0860-01100 TOTAL SITE FRONT YARD: 43.420 So. FT. OR 41.OX SO= f,385 S0. FT. OR 9.8X 3OOX Z TOPOGRAPHIC AND MISCELLANEOUS BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A PUN ENTITLED 'SITE PLAN' BY ALPINE DESIGN h 5) DEED REFERENCE: VOLUME 481. PACE 431-AS2 ENGINEERING, INC. DATED 8/11/99 FOR 1100 HINESBURG ROAD. 6) USE: 13.000 SO. FT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING J. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A PLAN ENTITLED 4600 SO. FT. GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING 'PLAT OF SURVEY BY WARREN A R08ENSREN DATED 9/22A9 FOR 1100 HINESBURG ROAD. f of � I .H I i N/F ARTHUR & LEXIE RYE T FOX RUN LANE N NOTE: LANDSCAPING TO BE DETERMINED Q R Ri fe ./ d c 4 M G y' of So. Burfington W.V4- - - - - - - - N/F MUNSON EARTH MOVING faaphlc Scale Feet 10 0 10 20 30 40 RECEIVED JUL 2 4 20 City of so. BurUngton 1 BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LTD N/F GREEN ACRES INC. 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I / / / / / R TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) 478 N*Pak Aod P.O. 11-308 (B02)6P"M1(phale) N7BMm, vennmt OS41% mm 9794Q6otwo VYe U. m the Weft etc www.7hddKaw gXnen ree cocoa ati CONCfPriIAL APPIOVAL SIaM6.S10N PIF13MI4AIY APPROVAL SU&NUSSION ACT 2% SI a AtaAaS90N mALeM SIQ90N coraTR ICT10N DIAWIICd m �ti -n.t-a �4nen-i .w, m,wot eoo„o.,4 R.awm`�eew�i,w�emr//oo�„w�t- �_e -,ante m. mwa,was'l..Ti„g. Namc.nww�a°aa.lr,eT I .W-aA;;= tie ..Pw. tA..el by E. er tn. �ww.-. • i S s' W ISI pro GCf Lom lo, Na Dmlpll9a Dlte y ReMW9FM - 10F11VF /////�� e~�ps`�aw�a * NOD„L37 P.f.d m& East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vr Sheetihle Sketch Plan DmM418NW6ft: 2006090-51 F2meWal: 1 ROfOCtn ww4w, AIM Dawn: AAL Dde. 0712012005 F.B. GOO Sale: 1' - 20' project ldaalee: XXX Xald: 2006090dc Bad: File: XXX Appetacd SPI July 24, 2006 Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: East Mountain View 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Ray: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com Enclosed is a Sketch Plan Application for East Mountain View, located at 1100 Hinesburg Road. The proposed project consists of a two-story, 21,600 square foot office building with basement level parking. It is anticipated that roughly 60% of the building will be occupied by medical office space, and the remaining 40% by general office space. The project will be served by municipal water and sewer. The proposed building footprint and parking layout are similar to a plan submitted by Malcolm Willard and approved by South Burlington in 2001. This approval has since expired and the property has changed hands. Enclosed are five full-size copies of the site plan, one reduced plan, and an application fee check for $125.00. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, TRtJDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Abigail Encl. Sketch Plan Application SPl- Site Plan Application Fee cc. Rand Larson 0(M0BelairL0l.doc P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting 9 C Permit Number SD- 6(------ APPLICATION All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax # East Mountain View, LLC, Attn: Rand Larson, 5399 Williston Road, Williston, VT 05495 (802) 238-9724 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 461, Pages 451-452 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) same as land owner 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) fee simple 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Rand Larson 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1100 Hinesburg Road 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0860-01100 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) no existing uses b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) two-story 21,600 square foot office building, approx. 13,000 sq. ft. medical, 8,600 sq. ft. general c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 10,800 sq. ft. d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) 35 f2 max. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 10.2 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing o % Proposed 41_0 c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % Proposed 9.8 % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) no existing encumbrances 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) applicant is proposing a service connection to the existing municipal water system, and connection to existing sewer manhole located near the northern property line 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) see attached sheet 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE June 2007 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. 2 C I hereby certify that all the informs requested as art of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my kno edge 1 /, 1WKS11,121�i Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 74V1()6 I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete T, I/Py/j� & Zoning or Designee 3 List of Abutters East Mountain View, LLC 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 860-10700 Michael Gravelin 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 860-01075 Aurthur & Lexi Rye 1075 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 284 C Munson Earth Moving 248 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01020 Burlington Properties, LTD 12270 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) Ada 3�� S') -�) U, 0, - LO-6 V, SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 November 2, 2005 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Re: Minutes — lioo Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved minutes from the October 4, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �&8 QWJ,3 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 4 OCTOBER 2005 setbacks. No encroachment is planned in the storm buffer except for grading which the Board does not have to endorse. If the applicant goes to the next step, they will have to show locations for sewer lines, etc. Mr. Goodrich said the existing house is connected to the city sewer. Ms. Leslie noted that when it rains, water backs up in their drains, and the water is black. Mr. Behr felt this would be too much development for the site. Mr. Dinklage said there may not be a legal basis to deny it. Ms. Leslie was concerned with the impact on the stream because of so much impervious soil. Mr. Goodrich said they would omit the existing paved area and would agree not to _pave -the new parking area: Continued miscellaneous application #MS-05-04 of Malcolm Willard to stockpile up to 2000 cubic yards of fill, 1100 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Willard said the fill would be about 4-5 feet high. There are no structures on the land, and the fill is incidental to a structure planned for the lot. There will be gravel for a driveway and parking. Mr. Belair expressed concern regarding erosion. He felt they may fall under the stormwater regulations because gravel is considered an impervious surface. Stipulation #3 of the motion was changed to read: The stockpiled soil shall not extend above Hinesburg Road. Mr. Kupferman then moved to approve application #MS-05-04 of Malcolm Willard subject to the stipulations in the draft motion, as amended above. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Miscellaneous application #MS-05-07 of Walt & Aimee Marti for a waiver from the Spear Street Ridge View Protection Overlay Zone to allow the construction of a dormer, 6 Whatley Road: Mr. Marti presented a letter from the architect stating that the dormer does not increase the ridge height of the garage roof. Mr. Dinklage noted that staff requested a drawing showing the elevation from Spear St. No other issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve miscellaneous application #MS-05-07 of Walt & Aimee Marti subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Kupferman seconded. Motion passed unanimously. -3- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 6, 2005 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Administrative Officer on 10/4/05 (effective 10/5/05). If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Bets cDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL 7003 3110 0001 3598 5633 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 27, 2005 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05403 Re: iloo Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, October 4, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy doqnogh Planning & Zoning Assitant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: September 7, 2005 drb\misc\willard\misc-fill.doc Application received: August 17, 2005 1100 HINESBURG ROAD Miscellaneous Application #MS-05-04 nda # L/ Applicants/Owners Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 802-879-1110 Location Map Meeting date: October 4, 2005 Property Information Tax Parcel ID 0860-01100 Industrial & Open Space District 2.43 Acres CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\willard\misc-fill.doc Malcolm Willard, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking miscellaneous approval to stockpile up to 2000 cubit yards of fill, 1100 Hinesburg Road. The application was scheduled for review by the Development Review Board on September 20, 2005. However, as nobody was present to represent the application, the Board continued the application to October 4, 2005. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair have reviewed the plans submitted on August 17, 2005 and have the following comments. This application shall be reviewed under Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the Development Review Board. The Development Review Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested in connection with the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a resource extraction operation. Standards and Conditions for Approval: (1) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for compliance with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). An application under Section 3.12(A) above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or addition of material. The applicant submitted a plan showing the placement of the fill on the subject property. While the plan shows the approximate location, it does not specify the height of the fill. 1. The applicant should address the height of any mounds created by the fill and adhere to any restrictions placed on the height by the Development Review Board. (2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time. The applicant has noted that this fill will be used in conjunction with future development already approved for the site. The Development Review Board should consider imposing a limit on the length of time the fill is allowed to remain in piles on the property. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\willard\misc-fill. doc (b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing drainage, and other appropriate measures. The proposed location of the fill is on an area approved as access to the property. Therefore, staff does not find that a plan for future seeding or planting is necessary. However, the fill poses a potential problem with stormwater runoff. The applicant should submit a plan to ensure proper erosion control. 2. The applicant shall submit an erosion control plan prior to issuance of the zoning permit. (c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure compliance with the provisions of this Section. Staff does not feel this requirement will be necessary for the subject application. (d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under Section 3.07, Height of Structures. The pre -construction height for future development will be the existing grade. Other: 3. No fill shall be placed in the public right of way of Hinesburg Road. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the DRB approve miscellaneous application #MS-05-04 subject to the applicant addressing the numbered items above. Respectfully submitted, YA&�VL 41 tlev'_6- Cathyihn LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Malcolm Willard, Applicant -7- " 7 3150 0 o 2?W WO 0� 00 7, 77 Up to 2,000 cubic yards of recycled road grom1 to be stockpiled on south side of property. __j RECEIVED AUG 17 2005 City of So. Burlington Location MoB Planning and Zoning Information Owner vndjppLj;mt.• Volume / &gq Malco/m WIllard 274IJ62 699 Nab Hill M11ston, W. 05495 Zoned - Industrial Open Space (//0) Me pray—d building #/ be aerwd by mu k*d —t— -d -- Afw.* 2.43 acres (sing existing "Ineshurg Road right of WY) Notes I Boundary information was taken from a plan entitled Site Plan by Alpine Design & Engineering Inc. doted 8111199 for 1100 Hinesburg Road Z. Boundary Information was token from a plan entitled "Plat of Survey' by Warren A Robenstlen, doted 9122199 for 1100 Hinesburg Road 01 20' 4,91 80, 120' 69 — 6=21 6==Mmm AgGr Scale I- - 20' DO, D—noein cnecaee D— D-ign OHN Fill 1010n Drawn FMP Checked Scale I- — 20' 1100 HInesburq Road Date Aug 15 2005 by Malcolm MIllard Project W203 Hlbesburg Road — South 8-Yingtn, V—ont AR-TOS& 1-4,VSZIV-- Consulting Angineers fne. 17777--� 1 16-vf Vain S&4ree4 Colchester, Vermont 49.5'4WS P -- --v: � �: � �. I r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 15, 2005 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Re: noo Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, ?&N Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assitant Encl. WCLAV��>vas cy Ole I koo a-Volm OlVa,cd (� tl.16b-N,.t� N;��e\ (-xAvelin IWO 4'CrSIa1(b KJ t&& CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO1 d DEPARTMENT OF 1r LAI TI'�UNG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMO" DTI' 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit 45 C� APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation ( ) Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance (✓Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY). - WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ? /_J 14 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #): Sf ,0 3 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) i/n/- 02IV 36,1, 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 699 NO Xuc WitlistmVT 05495 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax # if different from above): 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: //D`' 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: ORK0 -- D110o 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): I'atif B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): C. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): D. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): E. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): /11,�. F. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): "G — G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): toi1- 8) LOT COVERAGE A. Total parcel size: ' V ? A & fs Sq. Ft. B. Buildings: Existing IflO e % / Proposed / -14- % / . Sq. Ft .Sq. Ft. C. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing /U6ti''9 % / Sq. Ft. Proposed it'i¢ % l Sq. Ft. D. Total area to be disturbed during construction: Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES A. Building (including interior renovations): $ B. Landscaping $ _1. 0 C. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: _.... 0 A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) IVA B. A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): AUK C. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION /V/f 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 2005 14) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (list names and address of all abutting property owners, including those across any street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet of paper if necessary): I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Ir SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this application and find it to be: f COMPETE ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 September 12, 2005 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for the September 6, 2005 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Please call our office at 846-4io6 if you have any questions. Sincerely, '--�t _t q�b&"K Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. ( ATY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOf, , DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 September 12, 2005 Lexie & Arthur Rye 1075 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for a public meeting being held by the South Burlington Development Review Board. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, �I Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. A I C- 2005 ToloAtlas Image C, 2005 DigitalGlobo it.', w 02"Google- C) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: September 7, 2005 drb\misc\willard\misc-fill.doc Application received: August 17, 2005 1100 HINESBURG ROAD Miscellaneous Application #MS-05-04 nda # 10 Applicants/Owners Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 802-879-1110 Location Map Meeting date: September 20, 2005 Property Information Tax Parcel ID 0860-01100 Industrial & Open Space District 2.43 Acres CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\m isc\crook\dormer. sro. doc ..8 Malcolm Willard, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking miscellaneous approval to stockpile up to 2000 cubit yards of fill, 1100 Hinesburg Road. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair have reviewed the plans submitted on August 17, 2005 and have the following comments. This application shall be reviewed under Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the Development Review Board. The Development Review Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested in connection with the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a resource extraction operation. Standards and Conditions for Approval: (1) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for compliance with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). An application under Section 3.12(A) above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or addition of material. The applicant submitted a plan showing the placement of the fill on the subject property. While the plan shows the approximate location, it does not specify the height of the fill. 1. The applicant should address the height of any mounds created by the fill. (2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time. The applicant has noted that this fill will be used in conjunction with future development already approved for the site. The Development Review Board should consider imposing a limit on the length of time the fill is allowed to remain in piles on the property. (b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing drainage, and other CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\m isc\crook\dormer. srp.doc appropriate measures. The proposed location of the fill is on an area approved as access to the property. Therefore, staff does not find that a plan for future seeding or planting is necessary. However, the fill poses a potential problem with stormwater runoff. The applicant should submit a plan to ensure proper erosion control. 2. The applicant shall submit an erosion control plan prior to issuance of the zoning permit. (c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure compliance with the provisions of this Section. Staff does not feel this requirement will be necessary for the subject application. (d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under Section 3.07, Height of Structures. The pre -construction height for future development will be the existing grade. Other: 3. No fill shall be placed in the public right of way of Hinesburg Road. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the DRB approve miscellaneous application #MS-05-04 subject to the applicant addressing the numbered items above. Respectfully submitted, Cathya4 LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Malcolm Willard, Applicant l f 1.. i i 1 )I 'lf11la " South Burlington s° — — _ �— — ` i` � fI —=.�— — �� .r. — '..►mot ` I ! � O 89 — /7t I (" Location Mop 1 i 1 I Information Planning and Zoning 1 Owner and A,pakmt: Volume / Poae Malcolm Willard 274IJ62 699 Nob Hill Williston, Vt. 05495 1 Zoned- Industrial Open Space (//0) --pat —t du-n'dg ae ser�d by Arm- �, 2. 43 acres (asing existing Hinesburg Hood right of yf Notes.• I Boundary information was token from a plan entitled Site Plan by Alpine Design & Engineering Inc. dated !�^�\rllllll\fllllllj\Illllli \ .----`` (/ f 8111199 for 1100 Hinesburg Road. 2. Boundar information was taken from o plan entitled Y f l\\111111f 1 !'lot of Survey" b Warren A Robenstien doted 9 22 99 Y Y / / Ill111 \� ._ _ for 1100 Hinesburg Road. \r \IIit11 \f loll \IIl11l Jill VIIf\IIIIIVf\ ` i 1 II i\i Up to 2, 000 cubic yards of recycled road grove/ to be stockpiled on south side of property. RECEIVED AUG 2 3 2005 City of So. Burlington 01 20' 40' 60' 720' Bar Scale - = za' l� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZON04G 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 6, 2004 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05.495 Re: iloo Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: This is in response to your letter dated March 2004 seeking to extend the approval for your project at iioo Hinesburg Road. Section 17.04(C)(1) of the Land Development Regulations (copy enclosed) states that "if no action is taken by the subdivider to construct substantially his proposed subdivision within three years, said approval shall become null and void....". The last approval for your project is dated 2/20/01. Since it has been more than three (3) years since your last approval, your approval is null and void. If you want to keep the project "alive", I would suggest you reapply for approval which would give you another three (3) years. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerer ; RJ. Belair Administrative Officer ( f OVATIONS MALCOLM WILLARD, mfo • 699 NOB HILL WILLISTON, VT. 05495 • (802) 879-1110 NORTH COUNTRY LANDS' 'E & GARDEN CENTER 135 Talcott Road WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-7272 Fax (802) 878-9303 We hereby submit specifications and estimates for landscaping as follows: ......................................................................... ................ .. AV Page No. of Pages LANDSCAPING PROPOSAL CONTRACTOR LICENSE NO. JOB PHONE NO. JOB NAME / NO. JOB LOCATION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS APPROXIMATE STARTING DATE APPROXIMATE COMPLETION DATE .1 VYC rrupuly nereDy 10 Turnlsn material ana IaDOr - complete in accoraance wim V material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be coal above specifications, for the sum of: pieted in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra costs will be done only upon a written change order. The costs will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All elements of this agreement are contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. The estimate does not include material Payment to be made as follows: price increases, or additional labor and materials which may be required should unforeseen problems arise after the work has start;;. You, the buyer, may cancel this transaction at an time rior to midn; ht of the third dollars ($ business day after the date of this trans //' 1�--r`%'j ,1 action. Cancellation must be doge in writin . Authorized Signature Note: This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. Acceptance of Proposal: The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date Signature Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PI.AI NING & ZONE\\TG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMOtNT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 26, 2001 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 0.5495 Re: Final Plat Application, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed is a copy of the January 16, 2001 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me ? call. Sincerely, Z Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer 1 Encl DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 JANUARY 2001 the Design Review Committee does not approve landscaping and lighting plans within a six-month period, this approval shall become null and void. 4. Pursuant to Section 25.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board approves a 9 space or 13% waiver for a total of 60 spaces approved. 5. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the proposed change in use and expansion will generate 13.56 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 6. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 7. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the buildings. 8. The final plat plan (sheet 1) shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall he signed by the Development Review Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 4-2 with Messrs. Schmitt and Boucher voting against. Mr. Cameron left the meeting at this time. 9. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-00-70 of Malcolm Willard to amend a planned unit development consisting of the construction of an 18, 456 sq. ft. two-story general office building. The amendment consists of: 1) minor site modifications including landscaping and parking, and 2) increasing the size of the building to 21,690 sq. ft., 1100 Hine-2 burg Road: Mr. Willard said he is removing the access road in front of the buildings which reduces the area of lot coverage. Mr. Belair said he would like to see the right-of-way on the plan. Mr. Willard agreed to do this. Mr. Willard said he would like some relief on the landscaping amount. He wants to move some trees from one part of the lot to the other. He also didn't know if the sidewalk would ever be used. Mr. Schmitt said he was OK with moving some landscaping from the back. Mr. Dinklage said as this was part of the gateway to the city, he was not inclined to give anything on landscaping or the sidewalk. 7 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 JANUARY 2001 Mr. Belair suggested giving credit for the landscaping that is there and that won't be moved. Mr. Dinklage suggested a $4600 credit for existing landscaping and that any relocated tree that does not survive be replaced with a 10 ft. tree. Members agreed. Mr. Boucher moved to approve the final plat application #SD-00-70 of Malcolm Willard subject to the amended conditions in the draft motion dated 1/16/01. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Site plan application #SP-00-62 of Technology Park Associates to construct a 65,000 sq ft. general office building, 55 Community Drive: Mr. Illick said he was OK with the concerns of the City Arborist. He said they have put most of the landscaping between the building and the road. They don't intend to disturb the natural area except for the storm water ponds. Landscaping is more Shan required. Mr. Illick said they are OK with wherever the rec path goes. Members then considered the issue of circulation. Mr. Illick said he would prefer both curb cuts to be in and out traffic. Both are wide enough for this. Mr. Dinklage noted there is a requirement for one curb cut on a property unless one is an "in" only and the other an "out" only. Mr. Illick noted there is a third curb cut which is not on this property but which serves the property. After some discussions, members agreed to allow two in -out curb cuts because of the size of the lot. Mr. Illick gave members a drawing conception of the building and stipulated that this is essentially what the building will look like. Mr. Illick thought they had already paid for the sewer allocation. This will be checked on. Ms. Quimby moved that the Development Review Board approve the draft motion dated 10/17/00 as amended. Mr. Schmitt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Public Hearing: Final Plat application #SD-00-71 of John Larkin to amend a planned unit development consisting of: 1) an 89 room hotel building, 2) a 71 room hotel building, and 3) a 275 seat restaurant. The amendment consists of: 1) landscaping modifications, and 2) designating 15 parking spaces for future expansion, 1 Dorset Street: C =1 OF SO UrTH BURLINGTO DEPAITRTMEP�TT OF PLANNE� TG & ZONWG 575 EORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 21, 2001 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: Final Plat, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed please find a copy of the Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on January 16, 2001 (effective date February 20, 2001). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the plat plans be recorded within ninety (90) days or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Associate Planner Enclosure CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERIVIONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 12, 2001 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Re: Final Plat Application, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department, and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, January 16, 2001 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, ry Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO JANUARY 16, 2001 NEEE ING 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The Administrative Officer shall make the determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance and in the sign ordinance. 3. Prior to review by the Development Review Board the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The west to south facades at 338 Dorset Street shall be covered in vinyl so as to match the original intent at the approved elevation to be approved by staff. 4. The applicant shall be given a temporary C.O. until an approved landscaping plan is in place and a lighting plan is approved by the Design Review Committee and the Development Review Board. Summn of Issues: 1. The applicant has installed building mounted lights which do not comply with the original approval. The landscaping installed is significantly different than originally approved. The Design Review Committee has not reviewed and made recommendations regarding these two (2) issues. Does the Board wish to approve this application knowing that lighting and landscaping are out of compliance and will not be brought into compliance with this application or does it wish to wait until these items are reviewed by the DRC and presented to the Board for approval. 2. Parking waiver of nine (9) spaces or 13%, supported by staff. 9) WII LARD — FINAL PLAT — 21,690 SO FT OFFICE BUILDING, 1100 HINESBURG ROAD This project consists of amending a planned unit development consisting of the construction of an 18,456 sq. ft. two-story general office building. The amendment consists of. 1) minor site modifications including landscaping and parking, and 2) increasing the size of the building to 21,690 sq. ft., 1100 Hinesburg Road. The Development Review Board approved the final plat for this property on October 19, 1999 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 1100 Hinesburg Road lies within the IO District. It is bounded on the north by a residence, on the east and south by an undeveloped industrial park, and on the west by Hinesburg Road. Access/circulation: Access is proposed to be via a 25 ft. curb cut (minimum is 20 ft.) on Hinesburg Road. A 30 foot r.o.w. is being reserved through this property to provide future access to the properties to the north. This r.o.w. should be shown on the survey plat. The last time this was approved, the Board recommended a concept that a service JANUARY 16, 2001 MEETE'4G road would provide access for this property and the three (3) properties to the north. It would have one (1) curb cut on Hinesburg Road and one (1) on Swift St. extension. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 10.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 49.5% (maximum allowed is 50%). Front yard coverage is 9.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). The notes on the plan should be revised to include the front yard coverage information. Setback requirements are met. Parking: A total of 90 spaces are provided and 87 spaces are required. Four handicapped spaces are provided as required. A bike rack is also provided. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $18,500 and is not being met. The applicant has proposed $5,325 worth of landscaping for a $10,174 shortfall. The applicant has stated that he may wish to seek a landscaping credit for existing trees or the transplantation and relocation of several trees. This request has not been formally submitted. Staff recommends that since this is a new building, the landscaping plan should be revised to include more significant street trees as well as landscaping for the parking lot islands to meet the minimum landscaping requirement. Traffic: ITE estimates that the existing single family home generates 1.01 P.M. peak vehicle trip ends (vte's). The proposed office building will generate 31.97 vte's during the P.M. peak hour or 30.96 additional vte's. The applicant should be aware that a road impact fee will be required for the additional vte's. Lighting: All exterior lighting will be downcasting and shielded. No changes are proposed. Access easement: The applicant should record an access easement prior to permit issuance for the properties to the north to enable them to use the 24 ft. r.o.w. through this property. This easement should be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The exact location of the easement should be determined at a later date prior to its construction. Sidewalk: Staff recommends that the applicant construct a sidewalk on the west side of Hinesburg Road. Dumpster: A screened dumpster storage area is provided. Sewer: An additional sewer allocation has not been requested at this time. Other: The landscaping plan should be revised to show the same green areas between rows of parking spaces as shown on the site plan. The note on the site plan indicating DEVELOPMENT REATH'W BOARD MEMO JANUARY 16, 2001 ME1;TP4G that the 30 foot easement is to the "Town of So. Burlington" should be revised. The easement is for the properties to the north. Summary of Issues: The only issues relate to landscaping and whether the Board should grant a credit for existing landscaping or require the applicant to meet the minimum landscaping requirement. Staff recommends additional landscaping. 12) TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOCIATES — SITE PLAN — 65,000 SO. FT. GENERAL OFFICE WILDING, 55 COMMUNITY DRIVE This project consists of constructing a 65,000 square foot general office building, 55 Community Drive. This property is located within the Mixed Industrial and Commercial District and the C.O. District. It is bounded on the south by an undeveloped lot, on the east by Muddy Brook, on the north by an undeveloped lot, and on the west by Community Drive. Access/Circulation: Access will be provided via two 24 foot curb cuts on Community Drive leading to 24 foot access drives. Section 26.103(a) of the Zoning Regulations states that "unless specifically approved, there shall be a maximum of one driveway per lot accessing a public street". Staff recommends that the westerly access drive be ingress only and the easterly access be for egress only. The plans should show enter and exit signs to designate the access drives. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/Setbacks: The proposed building coverage will be 4% (30% max) and total coverage will be 24% (70% max). Front yard coverage will be 30% (30% max). All setbacks are met. Building Height: The applicant is requesting a 24.4 foot height waiver for the proposed building which is proposed to rise to an overall height of 59.4 feet. This is a flat roof structure which under Section 25.113 (a) of the zoning regulations has a maximum height limit of 35 ft. Under Section 25.113 (c) of the Zoning regulations, the DRB may approve an increase in height if the Board determines that a taller structure: (i) will not detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public streets and walkways; and (ii) will not detract from important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. Section 25.113 (d) of the zoning regulations requires additional setbacks for taller structures. The building must have a side yard setback no less than 27.2 feet, a front yard setback no less than 64.4 feet, and a rear yard setback no less than 54.4 feet. These setbacks are being met. 1/16/O1 air"V , MOTION OF APPROVAL WILLARD - FINAL PLAT - 21,690 SQ FT OFFICE BUILDING, 1100 HINESBURG ROAD I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-00-70 of Malcolm Willard to amend a planned unit development consisting of the construction of an 18,456 sq. ft. two-story general office building. The amendment consists of: 1) minor site modifications including landscaping and parking, and 2) increasing the size of the building to 21,690 sq. ft., 1100 Hinesburg Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled, "100 Hinesburg Road by Malcolm Willard Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Engineers, Inc., dated 11/7/00, last revised on 11/29/00 with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Four copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to recording:, a. The site plan and survey plat shall be revised to illustrate the 0 foot r.o.w. through the property which is reserved to provide future access to the operties to the north. b. The plan note shall be revised to include the front yard coverage information. c. The landscape plan shall be revised to include $4*,174- worth of additional landscaping as approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning. This--addifi©nai- landscaping shall include street trees in the -front yard -area. i d. The landscaping plan shall be revised to show the same green areas between rows of parking spaces as shown on the site plan. e. The site plans shall be revised to note that the 30 foot easement is for the properties to the north. 3. All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 4. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the office will generate 30.96 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 5. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall pay a sidewalk fee of $15 per linear foot frontage for construction of a sidewalk on the west side of Hinesburg Road. In the event that the sidewalk is not constructed within one (1) year of the payment of the fee, the City shall refund the sidewalk fee. b. The Development Review Board approves a sewer allocation of 750 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall record an access easement prior to permit issuance for the properties to the north to enable them to use the 30 foot r.o.w. through this property. This easement shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The exact location of the easement should be determined at a later date prior to its construction. 8. The applicant shall post an $18,500 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 9. The building shall be sprinklered and include a fire alarm. 10. The curb stop on the water service should be on the street r.o.w. line. 11. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 12. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 13. The final plat plans (sheet 1 of 1 and survey plat) shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void The plan shall be signed by the Development Review Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director. 1 / 16/01 MOTION OF APPROVAL WILLARD — FINAL PLAT — 21,690 SO FT OFFICE BUILDING, 1100 HINESBURG ROAD I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve final plat application 4SD-00-70 of Malcolm Willard to amend a planned unit development consisting of the construction of an 18,456 sq. ft. two-story general office building. The amendment consists of: 1) minor site modifications including landscaping and parking, and 2) increasing the size of the building to 21,690 sq. ft., 1100 Hinesburg Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled, "100 Hinesburg Road by Malcolm Willard Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Engineers, Inc., dated 11/7/00, last revised on 11/29/00 with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Four copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to recording: a. The site plan and survey plat shall be revised to illustrate the 30 foot r.o.w. through the property which is reserved to provide future access to the properties to the north. b. The plan note shall be revised to include the front yard coverage information. c. The landscape plan shall be revised to include $10-j-* worth of additional landscaping as approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning. This additional landscaping shall include street trees in the front yard area. d. The landscaping plan shall be revised to show the same green areas between rows of parking spaces as shown on the site plan. e. The site plans shall be revised to note that the 30 foot easement is for the properties to the north. 3. All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 4. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the office will generate 30.96 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 5. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall pay a sidewalk fee of $15 per linear foot frontage for construction of a sidewalk on the west side of Hinesburg Road. In the event that the sidewalk is not constructed within one (1) year of the payment of the fee, the City shall refund the sidewalk fee. 6. The Development Review Board approves a sewer allocation of 750 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall record an access easement prior to permit issuance for the properties to the north to enable them to use the 30 foot r.o.w. through this property. This easement shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The exact location of the easement should be determined at a later date prior to its construction. 8. The applicant shall post an $18,500 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 9. The building shall be sprinklered and include a fire alarm. 10. The curb stop on the water service should be on the street r.o.w. line. 11. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 12. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 13. The final plat plans (sheet 1 of 1 and survey plat) shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Development Review Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director. I I SURIINGTON PROPERTIES LTD —403 / -_. i// 1 + 273/265 �901'"� �'' / , ANN & RICHARD PAINTER E,, t9w �. `o ff -,4r"/„390' ( W 141/83 Rk 3W.2 •Sq� �c\� t• moo' . N9/'s[m Rood L--Y-Ui /--A-T5KjN EASEMENT �nd boot 1/S51 /pant-, Vr / i ! / �' V 21.01' 421.8 //--- -_ -'--�,1�'''I'��`t�6E_ DI'83'14iw E / w' J \ 1 1 �_ •- - i-��'r3b4�1- 1- i a°i' J 31 w f�e^�' 1l � r 3p5-!^ "!1 / 1 ![' I ! I� 9 l / ! ' / EM. ' / rcr ♦/ 39o. 1 / K/ ! 1 ! [ I South Burin tan I ! ! ! uh�r�•! / / �i,/i / / / ey +" i / N.. ce Alrw [ ! ! / e� I Pom 391A wag ! — i ! i / ! / I w..�ale.w.e 1 I IEU Y do 3t14.0 1 1 I rl / I ! I w 1 / / �' 4T I 7 '• • *: C +1 1."p I v ! � icrowed bosh / % i/ ♦ ! I 1 ap 199 I ��// � � � \\ 1 / [ / [ /,7 I � �- •�/r4 b�4t � 9 t � I � 1 � sna/asue. � ♦/ l : I / I � I + 1 I — 1 / // /♦/ 1 ! f I I I I ! 1 ' 1 \ I / / 1,f'� 1 1 •° t r _ �. 1, 1 1 ! �� ! ! ! / / 1 �. 1 1 1 Location Mov N/F ! I I' 1 l \ 1 / 11! I 1 1 1 ,a< • I I 1'' / / / ! / / --- 1 ! 11 1 1 I 1 I 1\ N/F N rs ARTHUR h I 1 1 1 \ !� I l 1 1 1 1 1 y I ( /_ / / /' l / , 1 1 1 I \ 1+ ', SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE LEXIE RYE i i ! II I ; 1 / 1 ! I / 1 1 1 I I $ :�^.,1 �t „'� K� I 1 '� 'i / ��'-"•'7-- / !! �/ / 1 I ! 1 I \ II 1 91 26 Haw taA h g / y1-- and W- with thrust blod. 1 ' 1 ! / / a 1 ,d N., I I 1' a > I ! j ! / — i/ ! > !' i 1 1 I II ' P/annin and Zoning Information / !i IFOM i 2AI 1 I I 9- - r_Owner and An icant.• Volume Pooe 'Q� 7 1 i I e I I A i ?, if s w. { 1 y / ! ! ♦ I /' I I I j II ! Afa/colm !hard 274 J62 I1 ' 7 oy /(1 �- . ! If / 1�/ ! —f-�jydFee,*.11 699 Nob Hill 1 i I Ner d c/5 _ W[/liston, Vt. 05495 1 1 h ,w Natf yard rdtrlmoi•1 1 !I 1 I s'F�♦ "# III .xn is /• / !/ /! I I ,/ I �• �W ! !p1! »fbont Aram /uM' ii--� I 1 'I I 'S� I / ° —� ,!/� rod./ / / , /! I I! I [ li Zoned.' 1 t ^ ! 1 -o/ 7' ' � - 1 ' � J '' �'cn.r„i 1 ;-/, / - /' / i / I i I / I /ndustrio/I1 11 / 1 ♦ ! !/1 ! I ioll,r ma Open Space (/sW ! t/!/I.1M-icpa -I- -dbe w"rd by C3 I in 1.-.\ I•`I f\ I I!�i Q.ZIArea.•�I 2.4J acres � � ! + 1 I / y`. 1\ \I •, I ( � 't�} � 3 '.� '' '� l l -_ (9 ! I 1 ! \I J 1 1 I I I 1 / 11' / 1 / 1 ' I ant to 1/ 1 \ 1Y ! I 1 -�I 1# 1 I 1 1 I / Ctl I + I Ir» o/SoutA 't / 1 1 rl I111 III I r `* i '�' / a / 1 1 11%d;191 r, V I ZOt Coverage.' (includes 24' wide future road)(11-5-2000) I m L__ A 1 11 +Ii 1 1 1 1 tt✓` I ! l l l 1 i ( )_ N Lot Area 2.43 acres 105,851 sf. Z 1 x I ! / I! 1 / 1! 1 I 1 I I " II y. 9 1a a90 { Burk to 10,890 s7. ! 4 Bui/drn Cowro e - 10.JX JOX max — A 1 I I I + i I/ I C1 / w 1 ( I I 1 9 9 t' �� I I I 1 1 mast' ( ) v 1 '�� � / / 1 / 1 ! I t�1 1 I I I I { � 7 s s � � I' �R 1 y � / ; ._ --- - ! `I �, I � � t 1 j ,[ I✓ Porkiilg Roods, Sidewalks• = 41,484 sf. 1 Total 6oHxa a= 1 890f r[ r80 49.5X r 1 I 3 a I w/ `\~\ `..- 1 / I I 11 I � g ��SA y= (50Xmax.) Inxu� P fiiE ysF. + lIl IA Ol6ce jspoce - 21,690 of. 'b, / i/ '1--i/-_-�/„ L \� l_ ♦\ I �.�a�� � tt�,',.„ - Y � Il � _ - �-- - - 1 -•'� - - h -- - --- 1----- ! l � 1 <✓' ,r Required Panlrin \ - \ h\ I ( ' \ ---- vu 1 . • J �/ / / �^ ► - - - ! I I s/ per PonPm l4reo des�natsa( (21,8901250 P 9 space B7 spaces /l !� /!� --- V°rt \� I Pior}ded Panting = 90 spaces - \I �...N -'' �\• �Jif I � / / I�� .�/�=r==1/t%/ �� !! V411 ! � \ �'""` �M ,�y I i �'\ /! _ -4 - _ � � \ t � 11 �� 7 __ ��-� �� 11-i I .i' use'' [ / � - — - 9--- - • i'�'_ 1 I \ ii ` Noted' -. A+%e,�OI �'M.,✓! Houndory and topographic information was token from a I I \ \ I 1 I I I \ // ! ♦ I ,ry,' / plan entitled Site Plan by Alpine Design d• Engineering __ r- T ! Inc. dated 8111199 for 1J010 Hinesburg Rood - 5- t -•,� I -=-?-ter- -7i—a )- —t --X'- I \ - -- ^t'?= '240.94 ---------- / 1 tt.h N8500' 52•_W-- j S TZY1' 47 E / r _ 4p Y �/ /�-1�N 8 ' 31' �i0w E I ; 194.74' r ! t N/F SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 91/26 / d'� �' SITE PLAN 20 40ea za SCALE: 1- — 20' - - Bar SCa/e 1• = 20' IN' It Af.—,,bw 25L 20M ba/dbg rrbX gadi% mbm Mn aor. r. ve Dasapro a--k d Design a i Preliminary Site Plan Draw LI9 ° SC(de T— 1100 Hinesburg Rood saga Data Now. z 200 by Malcolm )Yllord Project 1192Q7I HlneSbnr Rood South 8W, 1c ARE" & /rt/YSfW Consulting Engineers, &c /0 Alain Street, Colchester, T' -mont 0544(46' " '' AcR Ewet'ng 12 n. Pear T N/F to rem, BURLINGT'27 65ER'fICS LID Existing 18 Larch I Noway Spruce to remain Ctypcm) 24 Ezktn5 15-25' ft. ht tran> hints CLypcoU p I Norwey Spruce Trees to remaa 1' tDi T7 dab I I - / Maz RACKJ�7 / / l / ! I 1 / I i / i 3 .as N F 1 II ! 3 Ju5 / / xr / ! 1 ! 1 I / / I I 1 14 Etng 15-25' ft. ht. LE IE WE 'C' I + ! 1 2111 ! 5 Fil // / / % / I 1 Nurway Spruce trees I ! III ! -7- .. I 1 cty ,cau ( 1 1 I ! / to be relocated slang property tine o removed. Ezhting 12 n. Scotch Pin !! ( I ' 5 JuA I to rem ! I III I 3 P,M d'IT 0 Ezist'ng 2 ft. diam.�- to eemn r- 1Lror, AREA-21,690 sf 3 JW 1 ! I ( 1 I I I I ! I m ! ! ! ! ! II a ws f_ 13 JuA i I w 5 Jifi 1 i u 1 G lcKNow auemblt \ �\ Nei,ernjocf sr�n \ <�_ c' f. of > y+�New 8 dL wafer mole 240.94' 11.47• N 83 i00' 52' W S T 21' 47' E N 8l. 3i' 50" E 194.74 N/F SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTUR-_ 91/26 Ka,, Oiinn Ci>_ianti`if:r Nesma cl 1 E P!_AN SCALt: 1" - 20' Gonmon Nene Size + 5Decifiretion A C.'t G r!'Pr_rubrum October Glory October Glory Re '-p le -2.5 in., 5+5 JuB 23 Jur,i erus horizontalis Bar Harbor Bar harbor Juniper 12-15 in. JuA 3G Juni eru5 horizontalis Plum05a Andorra JLnl e- 12-15 in. Ju5 25 Juni erns pritzeriana 5eagreen Malua zumi crllocar a 5eagreen Juniper Zufn! Grabs le 18-24 In 2-2.5 ir.. B+B Maz 4 PiM 22 Pinu5 mugho Mugho Pine 18-24 In. 0' 20' 40' 80' 120' I ! Bar Scale t-= 20' Dots —aeC G.s Oti- IAedad Dote Deelgo Ma Londscope Plan Drcwn MLy M.choct Lowrence Landscape Architoct Essex ✓unction, Vermont Checked YCL 1100 Hinesburg Road Sro:e i" - 20__ Dote Nov. 27 2000 by Malcolm U/illord Project 9920.7 1 Hinesburg Rood Sauth 8,Hhg1on, Yam -_ AR "9S d'• LdNSt✓YG Consulting Engineers Inc /0 ,Main Street, Colchester; Vermont 054419 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 OCTOBER 1999 7. The Development Review Board approves an additional sewer allocation of 280 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. 8. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board approves 255 parking spaces which represents a 44 space or 14.7% shortfall. It is the Board's opinion that adequate parking will be available and the construction of the streetscape improvements will promote pedestrian movement. 9. Sign design approval is not being granted as part of this approval. Applicant will be required to reapply for this approval at a later date. 10. The building shall be sprinklered. 11. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 12. The final plat plans (the survey plat and sheet 1) shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Development Review Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Mr. Roth seconded the motion which was then passed unanimously. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary and Final Plat applications of Malcolm Willard for a planned unit development consisting of the construction of an 18,456 sq. ft. two-story general office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Willard said the main concern at the last review was the location of a sidewalk. Staff now says it can be constructed across the street. Mr. Willard had no problem with that. There have been studies on how to connect a curb cut for this property with the Swift St. Extension. There is a question of whether the right-of-way should be included in lot coverage calculations. They have reviewed various alternatives. Since the road is still in the thinking stages, Mr. Willard said he would like to request lot coverage remain at 39% or 40%. He said he would be happy to deed a right-of-way to the city. He would like to reserve that for the future in case the city makes another choice. Mr. Willard read a letter he had prepared regarding the conveyance of the easement. 8 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 OCTOBER 1999 Mr. Belair said it is not usual to require an owner to provide access to an adjoining property. That access is always included in the coverage. Mr. Willard said he believed it was granted when the project was originally heard. Mr. Belair said condition #8 of that approval said all overages would be met. He said he found a letter requesting that the access not be included in the coverage but did not find a response from the city. Mr. Roth asked if it would be possible to split the easement between the two properties. Mr. Belair said it could be, depending on who develops them. Ms. Quimby moved the Development Review Board approve the preliminary and final plat applications of Malcolm Willard for a planned unit development consisting of the construction of a 18,456 sq. ft. two-story general office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road, as depicted on a six page set of plans, page one entitled "Site Plat 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington VT, prepared by Alpine Design & Engineering, Inc, dated 8/12/99, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plat plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Three copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & zoning prior to issuance: a) The site plan shall be revised to provide a storm water retention basin approved by the City Engineer. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the general office will generate 24.5 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installations. Details of all proposed exterior lighting shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning for approval prior to permit issuance. 5. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $16,750 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 0J DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 OCTOBER 1999 6. Pursuant to Section 26.105(a) of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board grants the applicant an $807 landscaping credit for the existing street trees to remain on the site. 7. The Development Review Board approves a sewer allocation of 750 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. 8. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall pay a sidewalk fee of $15 per linear foot of frontage for construction of a sidewalk on the west side of Hinesburg Rd. In the event that the sidewalk is not constructed within one year of the payment of that fee, the City shall refund the sidewalk fee. 9. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall record an access easement approved by the City Attorney for the properties to the north to use the 30 foot r.o.w. through this property. The exact location of the easement shall be determined at a later date prior to its construction. 10. The building shall be sprinklered and include an alarm system. 11. Overall coverage shall be recalculated to include the 24 foot driveway located within the r.o.w. and this information submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. 12. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 13. The final plat plans (sheet SP-1 and survey plat) shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Development Review Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Mr. Farley seconded the motion which then passed unanimously. 8. Continued Public Hearing: Application of South Burlington Realty Company seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05 Conditional Uses and Section 26.65 Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request of for permission to use an existing building for a multiple number of uses, 366 Dorset Street; and 10 To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: January 16, 2001 Agenda Items Date: January 3, 2001 TECHNOLOGY PARK - LOT NO. i - COMMUNITY DRIVE 1. There exists buried electrical lines that served removed street lights, they should be shown. 2. Sewer force main should be at least ten (10) feet away from a gas main. 3. Electrical and telephone line should be outside of the sixty (60) foot street r.o.w. 4. City Water Department shal! review the water service connection. 5. Plan sheet No. D5 showing curb and pavement details is missing. 6. A lot of people walk on this street. A sidewalk should be included across the frontage. OFFICE BUILDING - 1100 HINESBURG ROAD 1. Curb stop on the water service should be on the street r.o.w. line. 2. City Water Department shall review the water service connections. Work within Hinesburg Road r.o.w. will require a State Highway permit. To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: January 16, 2000 agenda items Date: January B, 2001 1) Site Plan, Lot 7 Technology Park The applicant shall consult with the fire department on the location of a fire hydrant on the west side of Community Drive near the access for the sprinkler valve. 2) 1100 Hinesburg Road The building should be sprinklered and include a fire alarm. 412 2 3 1�G� l %� ���, /z-ems"'' _ f 2 �12 - 23-- 2 2S C/1- Io 2 Z Z D� -57, 6/73 U,p �Od� u ►d� L 7 p�7 P-008 CJ(-)q saU i-1 bbi /'p/b SUGH-Jt no Ir�� 0011 - Pi°Il'T,uld'no(� puv� J� j JOP16 / 9S� � cz, z / y f K �-Ft4 Eb l a� s� P1, 0 l 77- 9 0 &e---, o e 1z_5-.- 0 g 4. 76- . =g2, 1-5 of traffic generation during the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. (g) Lot coverage calculations including building, overall and front yard coverage. (h) Any other information or data tha# the Planning Commission shall require. 26.102 Review Standards The Planning Commission, during site plan impose conditions on the following items: (a) Pedestrian d vehicular access: i width of access of ts, curve radii at c deceleration la es n adjacent pub improvements, s ared ccess with adjoin sidewalks and/o other alkways. (b) Circulation: inclu 'ng appropriate emergency vehicl and v hicular and pe location of parkin areas t prevent confli traffic onto a publ c street prevention c and pedestrians, a d locati of loading o (c) Parking: including numNI size and and appropriate aisl widths t access par: (d) Landscaping and location of trees, fro screening of outside s lighting from public s , shall consider and may uding location, number and ess points, acceleration or streets, sight distance properties, and location of lsle widths to accommodate strian movement patterns, s with entering and exiting conflicts between vehicles ;creeping\ including si t yard gr n space, o ?age areas, other unsi ets and/or djoining (e) Other: including drainage, firs aesthetics, and similar s to factors that the above aspects of site Ian review. 26.103 Driveway and Street Retionirements :ion of parking spaces, spaces. , variety, number and er buffer yards, and Ltly areas and exterior operties . , outdoor lighting, ly interrelated with The following standards for driveways and their intersections with public streets shall apply during site plan review: (a) Unless specifically approved by the Planning Commission there shall be a maximum of one driveway per lot accessing a public street. This provision shall not exclude a shared driveway between two or more lots, or dual driveways where one lane is marked for entering traffic and one lane for exiting traffic. (b) Driveways shall meet the following standards unless a different size is required by the Planning Commission due to special circumstances: Residential - 12 feet minimum width, 36 feet maximum width; Commercial - 20 feet minimum width, 36 feet maximum width. 71 7 jou' . ncnr,u.0 SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a pub- lic hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burling- ton, Vermont on Tues- day. January 16, 2001, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the follow- Ing: 11 Final plat apotica- tion #SD-00.71 of John Larkin to amend a planned unit devel- opment consisting of: 11 an 89 roam hotel building, 21 a 71 room hotel huildin27, and 11 a 215 Salt lestawi ant The amendment ;on- sist of: 11 landscapin modifications, and 21 designating 15 park- ing spaces for future expansion, 1 Dorset Street. 2 Final plat applica- tion #SD-00-72 of Wright/Morrissey Re- alty Corp. to subdi- vide a 4.91 acre par- cel Into two (21, lots of 1.5 acres (lot#111 and 3.41 acres (lot#21, 60 Farrell Street. 31 Final plat applica- tion #SD-00-70 of Mal- colm Willard to amend a planned unit development consis- ting of the construc- tion of an 18,456 sq. ft. two-story general office building: The amendment consists of- 11 minor site, modi- fications including landscaping and park- ing, and 21 increasing: the size of the build- ing to 21,690 sq. ft., 11Q0 Hinesburg Road. 41 Appeal #A0-00-13 of Michael Brace ap- pealing the denial of zoning permit #c'P-00- j 420 by the Adminis- trative Offer. to. add one (1] dwelling unit to a four (4] unit multi -family dwelling, 363 Juniper Drive. 5] Final plat appiica- don #SDOO-69 and De- sign Review applica- tion #DR'-00-31 of Edgar Welch.. to amend at planned unit development consis- ting af: 11 a 12,900 sq. ft, retail building which includes one 11] dwelling unit, 21 a 1,800 sq. ft. retail building, and 31 a 1,- 800 sq. ft. accessory building. The amend- ment consists of: 11`. converting '2,594 sq. ft. of retail space to general office space in main buildinw 2 adding 599 sq. ff. o� mezzanine retail space to main build- ing, 3, facade .altera> tions to all buildjngs, 4] s,ignage altera tions, and 51 site mod- , #icetions to parking, landscaping and lighting_ 338-340 Der - set St. John Dinkitige Chairman South Buriumtoo Development Review S ( -a0 70 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of A p p 1 i c a n t e,vle sv1 2 ) Name of Subdivision ��� l�-<-/ �� s �� /? X 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plot designer since preliminary plat application 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: /I ` C . 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and cpntaining all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a major subdivisi //IA��' // ,?aad (Signature) applicant or contact person wirer 0 fC. t to �' '� " ; U � �11�'�11:�►1�11\C:l�/C�7\l\CLJ� 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 6, 2000 Malcolm Willard 699 Knob Hill Williston, SIT 05495 Re: Sketch plan, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed please find a copy of the March 21, 2000 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Encls of 85 units in 4 buildings and subdividing a 12.67 acre parcel into three parcels of 7.01 acres, 0.33 acres and 5.33 acres. The amendment consists of 1) revising building locations on the westerly parcel, and 2) combining three previously approved lots into one lot: Mr. Rabideau reviewed the history of the project. The question has been whether to develop the west side of the road which contains a rare and irreplaceable resource (cliffs and cedar trees). This plan is the only option: to develop the west side to the road and preserve the irreplaceable area in tact. The developer will place two buildings (23 units and 22 units) with underground parking (50% of the parking will be underground). Mr. Rabideau showed the dumpster enclosure. He also showed how they will take advantage of the topography. The buildings will be the same type as the original plan with foundations buried as much as possible. They have been asked not to add any vegetation near the special area but there will be street trees and plantings to screen the parking from the street. Mr. Levesque asked about safety with people who might be tempted to climb the cliffs. He was concerned with the city's liability. Mr. Rabideau said there is a fence on the east side and he felt they should probably do the same on the west side. He added that the units are planned to attract retirement couples and very young couples, not families with children. Ms. Budd noted the Lime Kiln Bridge is a critical site for connection of the Rec Path to other communities. She wanted to be sure this development does not ----Jude that and would also like to secure an easement at this time. Mr. Rabideau said they have a 50 ft. setback so that shouldn't be a problem. No other issues were raised. 6. Sketch plan application #SD-00-08 Malcolm Willard for construction of an office building at 11.00 Hinesburg Road. This project consists of amending a planned unit development approved on 10/19/99 consisting of the construction of a 21,374-sq. ft. 2-story general office building on a 2.43-acre lot. The project is currently developed with a single family dwelling that will be removed: Mr. Willard said that upon talking with potential tenants, they found the main objections were that the building was backed up to the embankment, which didn't allow for light in the back of the first floor. They want to move the buildings to address this concern. There is also a question of whether parking should be on the side or in the rear. Mr. Belair noted that A&M had to put parking in back and he felt this should be consistent. Members agreed. 6 Mr. Willard asked if they could then add a third story. Mr. Dinklage said the could if they meet all the requirements. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Application for a variance #VR-00-01 by Ernest L. Levesque, Jr., for a third rental unit and accessory apartment at 195 Hinesburg Road. Application of Ernest L. Levesque, Jr., seeking: 1) a variance from Section 25.00, Area Density and Dimensional Requirements, and 2) a variance from Section 26.75, Accessory Residenhai Units, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to 1) add a third residential unit on a 15,000 sq. ft. lot currently developed with a 2- family dwelling (minimum lot size required is 32,670 sq. ft.) and 2) add an accessory residential unit to the existing 2-family dwelling, 195 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Levesque noted that Ralph Goodrich bad been approved for a 3-unit building in the same R-4 zone and others have as well. He read a statement indicating that he felt the zoning regulations were outdated and did not allow development in the City Center zone. He also felt that a precedent had been set by the Zoning Board in allowing the Goodrich units and also additional units to Boyd and McGibney. He gave the Board copies of the Goodrich, McGibney and Boyd projects. He said he is being discriminated against. Mr. Belair noted the criteria for accessory apartments. Mr. Dinklage suggested Mr. Levesque follow the procedures for a zoning regulation change. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Development Review Board deny Appl:,- _-:"n VR-00-01 based on the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and decision in Document DR- 00-01. Mr. Roth seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Site Plan Application #SP-00-04 to amend the site plan for the Harbor Sunset extended stay hotel for landscaping at 1700 Shelburne Road. The proposed project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a 70-unit hotel approved on 1/10/98 to reflect landscape changes: Mr. Rabideau said a landscape screen was required. What was planted grows slowly to about 4-5 feet in height. He felt this plus the retaining wall will provide enough screening. Mr. O'Rourke said he wanted to see bigger trees to screen the entire area. Mr. Dinklage noted that staff recommends additional landscaping replacing what was planted with a variety of Austrian Pines, White Pines, etc, 4-5 feet high. 10 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: March 21, 2000 agenda items Date: March 14, 2000 ERNEST LEVESQUE, JR. - 195 HINESBURG ROAD Recommended Denial JOHN LARKIN - IRISH FARM - ALLEN ROAD Sprinklered multi -family units MALCOM WILLARD - 1100 HINESBURG ROAD — Building must be sprinklered — Hydrants should be depicted on plans STEPHEN & SHONA UNSWORTH - FAR WATER, LTD — Sprinklered buildings required — Bad access to buildings west 1 & 2 — No turn-around's DORSET SQUARE ASSOCIATES - 150 DORSET STREET Acceptable DensiW The maximum number of units allowed on the westerly parcel, or lot two, (after road realignment) is 45 units and 45 units are proposed (11.44 acres x 4 units/acre = 45.76). Parking A total of 192 spaces are required and 193 spaces are proposed. The applicant has proposed five handicap parking spaces and six are required. Bike racks have been proposed for both lots one and two. Landscaping: The preliminary plat plan should include a detailed landscaping plan. Access: Three (3) access points are proposed. A 24-foot curb cut is proposed on the western portion of the site. There are two other 30- foot curb cuts on the eastern portion of the property. One of these 30-foot curb cuts is illustrated as being for entry while the other is marked as an exit. The 30-foot curb cuts are only shown on the engineering plan (sheet 2 of 2). Both plans should be the same. Recreation path: The Recreation Path Committee reviewed the project and recommends that an approximately 400 foot long, 20 foot wide easement should be granted on the southern boundary line on the west side of Airport Parkway extending to the rear and then running behind the existing segment to avoid the Shamrock Road intersection. This easement would help to provide pedestrian access to the Lime Kiln Road bridge. Building elevations: Building elevation plans should be submitted with the preliminary plat submittal. The new plans illustrate Buildings 1W and 2iW as being located along the southern most and eastern most edges of the property. This creates a rather continuos fagade that will not be aesthetically compatible with surrounding developed properties (Section 26.15 of the Zoning Ordinances). If possible, these buildings may be angled back into the property as had been previously proposed. It is recognized that there are unique natural features on the property that may prevent the buildings being pushed back farther onto the lot. If it is not possible to move the buildings back onto the lot, the applicant should try to address the relation of the proposed buildings to the streetscape through landscaping. lb ALCOLM WI L LARD - OFFICE BUILDING - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of amending a planned unit development approved on October 19, 1999 (minutes enclosed) consisting of the construction of a 21,374 square foot 2-story general office building on a 2.43 acre lot. The property is currently developed with a single-family dwelling that will be removed. This property located at 1100 Hinesburg Road lies within the IO District. It is bounded on the north by a residence, on the east and south by an undeveloped industrial park, and on the west by Hinesburg Road. 0 Access/circulation: Access is proposed to be via a 25 ft. curb cut (minimum is 20 ft.) on Hinesburg Road. A 24 foot r.o.w. is being reserved through this property to provide fixture access to the properties to the north. The last time this was approved, the Manning Commission recommended a concept that a service road would provide access for this property and the three (3) properties to the north. It would have one (1) curb cut on Hinesburg Road and one (1) on Swift St. extension. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 9.7% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 46.3% (maximum allowed is 50%). Overall coverage should include the future road if it does not already. Front yard coverage is not provided (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met, but it should be noted that the proposed front ;yard setback would create a visual rift in the Hinesburg Road corridor and therefore an ill - proportioned streetscape. Parkin : A total of 86 spaces (four of which must be handicapped spaces) are required. Only 82 spaces, including three handicapped spaces, are being provided. There is a four (4) space or 4.7% shortfall. The applicant should be prepared to justify this shortfall. A bike rack is also required. Landscaping. The applicant has not submitted any information pertaining to building costs or landscaping at this time. It should be noted that the property is bounded on the north and south by residential properties with moderate front yard setbacks. A residential development across the street is setback with an evergreen buffer between the road and the rear yards of the homes. The proposed berm along Hinesburg Road will create a visual barrier that, while shielding the parking lot from direct -%riew, will also divisively severe the property from the adjacent landscape in an area where views are sweeping rather than constrained. Traffic: ITB estimates that the proposed office building will generate additional vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant should be aware that a road impact fee will be required. 7 Li : All exterior lighting will be downcasting and shielded.. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant should submit details of proposed lights to the Director of Planning & Zoning for approval. Access easement: The applicant should record an .access easement prior to permit issuance for the properties to the north to enable these to use the 24 fr. no.w. through this property. This easement should be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The exact location of the easement should be determined at a later date prior to its construction. Sidewalk: Staff recommends that the applicant construct a sidewalk on the west side of Hinesburg Road. Dempster: A screened dumpster storage area is provided. Sewer: Sewer allocation has not been requested at this time. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. Other: Since the proposed structure will be significantly down -slope from Hinesburg Road, the parking lot will perhaps be more visible than the building. The parking area will appear to be the front yard of the structure from Hinesburg Road. In an area where parking lots are currently not visible from the road, the proposed plans will not be aesthetically compatible with surrounding developed properties. Section 26.151 (Planned Unit Developments) requires under criteria h that projects "will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic natural beauty of the area, is aesthetically compatible with surrounding developed properties, and will protect rare and irreplaceable natural areas and historic sites." Staff recommends that the site be designed as previously approved with the building along the road and all the parking behind the building. 7) VARIANCE RE12UEST—1ERNEST UEVESOUE, JR. — THIRD RENTAL UNIT AND ACCESSORY APARTMENT, T, 195 HINESBURG ROAD l&. Levesque is seeking 1) a variance from Section 25.00 Area, Density, and Dimensional Requirements, and 2) a variance from Section 26.75, Accessory Residential Units, of the South Burlington .Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to: 1) add a third residential unit on a 15,000 square foot lot currently developed with a two (2) family dwelling unit (minimum lot size required is 32,670 square feet) and 2) add an accessory residential unit to the existing two (2) family dwelling, 195 Hinesburg Road. This property is located in the Residential 4 District. in order for the Development Review Board to grant a variance the five criteria (refer to Section 4468 of the Planning and Development Act of 1969) must be met. M CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 17, 2000 Malcolm Willard 699 Knob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Re: Office Building, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, r' r Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 7, 2000 Malcolm Willard 699 Knob Hill Williston, ITT 05495 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Road —Sketch flan for a Planned Unit Development Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed please are preliminary staff comments on the above referenced project. If you wish to respond, please do so by March 14, 2000. The project is currently scheduled to go before the Development Review Board on March 21, 2000. Please be sure someone is present to present your request at 7:30PM. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. S /I t. •oe\ / ■r I I t - �� 11 _wa- / - - - - _s02- - / /F. 'b MWisron Rood `\ vo 1 20' UTILIT/1' EASEMENT -- -—-- pCO {* pl{�OQiz70Q Q/ qF South Burthgfon y� Wll/ist I / � „>,.. T i -? / 1S 1•� '�� �A'✓ 1 •d trash 1 1 I ,/ /�\ hMaw% 1 ew era q,e I Fu4ww• I I II / /N•r ie &10/� T I / � brrn With I �•- I l s' /�iyA r6ir• phs En �. W 1 I \ I 1 P/onninq and Zoning /nformation - I ! / ..� "" ' ��• / / / / / / / / I I I \I I 1 owner and ALnollcant• - •,.� 1 / �� +� I I / y " Malcolm W1/lid 899 Nob Hdl ,)x�, o �� ,/ / '/ / j I W1isston, VG 05495 O✓led.' /5a' Amr lI oven Space (//0) I / �W a•[,•Mr 1 I ._f ,'C, i / , i I / I / I 1 m. aroorM bu/di'p rN 0• served by 170 a ny v,y:: " ` / / / , / I / / I I / 1 f11WIk rote► and set+! i i �� X. • a 'rat- '�; , / / / .{ I / \ • / / R I Ate. \ 0 / / / /(► NNJw Mop/e free I -1 nr l I i Y",i ll s \ \ \ C✓ee, Mop/e Me• I I I y, / I I I 2.13 acres r A I I I I I 7 % I \\\ :r I I �, ba* mr,Qyd I 1 I ' rear I / �` j (,+ONerOOe.' (endudes 24' wide /ul— rood) 1 1 1 I I �I I I I .tta'/_¢,�•vw�•;' Mrs I 1 rot 46t Area ( ) k✓ Aowr baEc W \\ / I I �e+d - Bub rng Z'� acres 10,2501 sff 111 �.1 I I Nee, borkl mWahed 11 / 1 I I / I I �. 1 P.ennid sown beds I ( Bud#7g coverage gar1esl I 1 I to RoodX Sidewalks. • = JB,7J2 s/. III IS,X1 ?o ,'t ,m 00 / I \ / II I i 1 Totol 6oHroge =�df,— -46.3X L With io- / ,// I I!• ! t w: .. \ i % I II I �I r wt` 0fflc/IcP!!f Qi s space - 21,J74 sf. L _ E.a.511� HWff —i — 1 RsquMed Painting a ------------ (20,5001250 sl per parking space = 82 spaces Avvded Paling m 82 spaces forrabwted w•s 1 Notes I 1 J�� / /i / 1 lirltdle raid ` t intimation was token from o /_ NOW Pfk f -- L+-----�---i-11----�- - -� �� / o a l / ,Boundiy and topographic -- -- I / / an entitled Site P/on by Alpine Design £nginearing \ I 1 I I I \\ _ _ l T~ , / In doted 8111/99 /i 1100 Hinesburg Rood. 4;i R ,..ate C F BO' 120' 41. SITE PLAN 2000 SCALE 1' _ 20' ._ - Bar Scale -> .,e _ ,aµa ... -- ---------- ----- --- n Nlsr Joao ID U 0 _ ra 0 ---- E e Nee, d' high landscWed berm with Perennial planing' and s' SECTION white P A/ gh (nea SCALES: HORZ. 1• - 20' VERT. 1 • - 20' el a -- -- ----�-��- �; --------------------- avte -W-d (itvtoMw Design ' Sketch Plan Drawn S° Scale 1100 Hinesburg Rood Scale Date Feb. /a 2aa° by Malcolm Willard Project 992(AJ _I H:oesbur R d South Burlin ton, Vet jr".RS d' L.IN.S/NC Consu-Iiing Engineers, Ana - /0 Alain Stree4 ColcAesterr, Aermont 0"4OS 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8} x 11, 8J x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development. /'v�" 4--Z '�7 (Signature) applicant or contact person Date 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record Cd��L�f�1SZ%' � �9 ff1'oCs b. Applicant�2 c . Contact 't Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). 1/0DtiFr�a�� Applicant's legal option, etc. interest in the property (fee simple, 0 Gylu e-le Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. /V67Wr/I 1 To: Applicants From: Sarah MacCallum, City of South Burlington ® Project Staff Notes Date: March 3, 2000 SD-00-08 Malcolm IW02rd —1100 Hinesburg Road — Sketch ?Ian Tor a ?panned Unit Development) hevioas A don: Final Flat, Manned Unit Development, approved by the Development Review Board on October 19, 1999. Overview: The applicant was given approval to construct an 18,456 sq. ft. two-story general office 'wilding at 1100 Hinesburg Road. This approved planned called for the building to be constructed along 1nesburg Road with parking in the rear. The new plans submitted locate the parking between the building and Hinesburg Road. Since the time of the original final plat approval, the Development Review Board has approved plans for other buildings in the vicinity along Hinesburg Road that have parking in the rear. ys�:se�: The proposed project will demolish an existing rresidence with a sauna)) !front yard setback. 'The property is bounded an the north and south by residential properties with moderate front yard setbacl,Ks. A residential (development across the street is settback with an evergreen buffer between the road and the rear yards of the homes. A more significautt setback tthaun the one previously approved at 1100 Hinesburg Road would creatte visaual rift in The Hinesburg Road corridor ;mend therefore an ill-proporttioned sttreetsMpe. ;dunce the proposed structure will be sigflnificatindy down -dope £rom Hinesburg Road, the parking Rot will perhaps be moire visible lhaun the building. Fine parking area will appear to be the i°ro ntt yard otf dace structure Yrommn Hinesburg Road. In an area where paTkiang pots acre cuurreunttly not visible i'roma€t the road, the proposed plans will not be aesthetieally compatible with surrounding developed properties. The proposed berm along Hinesburg Road will create a visual barrier that while shielding the parking lot Troutm direct view, will :also divisively severe the property d'rourm the rdjacentt landscape in an area where views are sweeping n°atther than constrained. The proposed plans Flo not meet criteria H of The General Standard 'for -Manned Unit De-✓e9opments under Section 26.15 of the Zoning Ordinances. Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted sufficient information for Development Review Board to consider the sketch plan. Recommend on Staff recommends that this application be authorized to proceed for Development Review Board consideration. t ) The applicant should remove the landscaping berm and reduce the front yard setback. 2) Parking for the building should be to the rear of the building. 3� The building should be placed at an elevation that will allow it to be more predorninate than the parking area on the property. 4) If the building can not be relocated so as to be closer to the road, the applicant should consider retaining the existing residence to help visually control the streetscape. 1) ojMOTION OF APPROVAL 10/19/99 MALCOLM WILLARD I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve the preliminary & final plat applications of Malcolm Willard for a planned unit development consisting of the construction of a 18,456 square foot 2-story general office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road, as depicted on a six (6) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Site Plan 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington VT, prepared by Alpine Design & Engineering, Inc., dated 8/12/99, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The plat plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to issuance: a) The site plan shall be revised to provide a storm water retention basin approved by the City Engineer. 3) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the general office will generate 24.5 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4) All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. Details of all proposed exterior lighting shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning for approval prior to permit issuance. 5) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $16,750 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6) Pursuant to Section 26.105(a) of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board grants the applicant an $807 landscaping credit for the existing street trees to remain on the site. 7) The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 750 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. 1 8) Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall pay a sidewalk fee of $15 per linear foot of frontage for construction of a sidewalk on the west side of Hinesburg Road. In the event that the sidewalk is not constructed within one (1) year of the payment of the fee, the City shall refund the sidewalk fee. 9) Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall record an access easement approved by the City Attorney for the properties to the north to use the 30 foot r.o.w. through this property. The exact location of the easement shall be determined at a later date prior to its construction. 10) The building shall be sprinklered and include an alarm system. 11) Overall coverage shall be recalculated to include the 24 foot driveway located within the r.o.w. and this information submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. 12) Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 13) The final plat plans (sheet SP-1 and survey plat) shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Development Review Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. 2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 30, 1999 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, October 8, 1999. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, " `1- - Lisa ahoney, Zoning & Planning Assistant LJM/mcp Encls f)Sound levels will be taken at 50 foot corners of the blasting and crushing site and recorded with the Zoning Administrator to provide a baseline. g)In the event of significant violations or problems with the permit as granted and stipulated, the Board will have the right of re-entry and review. MALCOLM WILLARD/1100 HINESBURG ROAD - OFFICE BUILDING - PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT -The note on the plan should be revised to show the correct zoning district (I-O). -The applicant is proposing $15,943 in landscaping which is $807 or 4.8% short of the required amount of $16,750. However, when combined with existing landscaping, the landscaping proposal is adequate. -The applicant should include exterior lighting details (cut sheets). -Staff is still investigating the issue of whether a sidewalk should be constructed on this side of Hinesburg Road. -The applicant should submit coverage information. The front yard coverage should be measured from the planned right-of-way. HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - ELUVUNATE LOT 127/GOLF COURSE ROAD - FINAL PLAT -Staff does not recommend any changes to the plat. DORSET SQUARE ASSOCIATES - RETAIL BUILDING - MARKET STREET - FINAL PLAT AND DESIGN REVIEW -The applicant should revise the plan so that the spacing between street lights is approximately 80' as required by the May 250, 1999 Findings of Fact and Decision. -The existing dumpster storage fencing should be shown as constructed. -The proposed road should be shown as 40' in width. MAZUR - ENCLOSE DECK - VARIANCE -This expansion is not justified as an alteration of a non -complying structure under Section 26.002 of the zoning regulations because it does not meet the zoning requirements. -Expansion of this structure does not meet the criteria for a variance: 7) MALCOLM WILLARD - OFFICE BUILDING - PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATS This project consists of a planned unit development consisting of the construction of a 18, 456 square foot 2-story general office building on a 2.43 acre lot. The property is currently developed with a single family dwelling which will be removed. This same office building was approved on 5/2/89 but was never built. The sketch plan was reviewed on 8/3/99 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 1100 Hinesburg Road lies within the IO District. It is bounded on the north by a residence, on the east and south by an undeveloped industrial park, and on the west by Hinesburg Road. Access/circulation: Access is proposed to be via a 30 ft. curb cut on Hinesburg Road. A 30 foot r.o.w. is being reserved through this property to provide future access to the properties to the north. The last time this was approved, the Planning Commission recommended a concept that a service road would provide access for this property and the three (3) properties to the north. It would have one (1) curb cut on Hinesburg Road and one (1) on Swift St. extension. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 9.4% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 39% (maximum allowed is 50%) This coverage calculation does not include the 24 foot driveway to service the adjoining lots to the north. The applicant is asking for a waiver to not include this area in the overall calculation. Staff calculated overall coverage including the drive to be approximately 46%. Staff recommends that this access drive be including in the overall coverage calculation. Front yard coverage measured from the planned r.o.w. is 30% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. Parking: A total of 74 spaces are required and 75 spaces including three (3) handicapped spaces and a bike rack are being provided. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping required, based on building costs, is $16,750 which is not being met. The applicant is proposing $15,943 in landscaping which is $807 or 4.8% short of the required amount. However, when combined with existing landscaping, the applicant's proposal is sufficient. Traffic: ITE estimates that the proposed office building will generate 24.5 additional vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $4700. Lighting: All exterior lighting will be downcasting and shielded. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant should submit details of proposed lights to the Director of Planning & Zoning for approval. Access easement: The applicant should record an access easement prior to permit issuance for the properties to the north to enable them to use the 30 ft. r.o.w. through this property. This easement should be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The exact location of the easement should be determined at a later date prior to its construction. Sidewalk: Staff recommends that the applicant pay $15 per linear foot frontage for construction of a sidewalk on the west side of Hinesburg Road. If the City does not build this sidewalk within one (1) year, the applicant will be refunded the money. Dumpster: A screened dumpster storage area is provided. Sewer: Sewer allocation requested is 750 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. 8 & 9) SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY COMPANY - MULTIPLE USES - DESIGN REVIEW, SITE PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE This application was continued from the October 5, 1999 meeting (minutes not available) to provide the City Attorney an opportunity to render an opinion as to whether the City should treat this application as a site plan or PUD. It is the City Attorney's opinion that we treat this application as a site plan. This project consists of amending a previously approved plan for two (2) existing buildings consisting of: 1) 3600 square foot convenience store, 2) 1200 square foot fast food restaurant with 22 seats, 3) 3500 square feet of general office space, and 4) 4560 square foot shop and contractor's yard. The amendment consists of: 1) renovating the 366 Dorset Street building and allowing the 4560 square foot shop area to be used for a multiple number of commercial uses for a multiple number of tenants, and 2) maintaining a portion of the property for a contractor's yard. This property located at 364, 366 and 368 Dorset Street lies within the CD2 District. It is bounded on the north by a commercial building, on the west by Dorset Street, and on the south and east by San Remo Drive. 9 4G4 • 403 402 N/F 4O1 ANN & RICHARD PAINTER I ' 400 399 141/83 1 ' "{r r-Rry 403 5 IINV. 399.3 . m ) I I ' .III I PRr ' I 1 1 i Cpt N/1 I A11I11LIIt 1l XII RlI 1 II I 1 QO ,I I n I « 11 I 1 � I , 1 T •r-•I pC! nr 11 1 M I W,MRE 0 \ ` V) Ld i I W I Z I I = I 1 I I 1 I� I� I I I Il:Ir:N ITY�nX IU�NHI III 5 I I 1I 1 1 • , 1 I 1 `:IIIVI A VAI V! � I I J 1 35• IN n W II } I : I ' ; I I I 1 � I -LEGEND -_ --. oRRRR r+wINr a«r - yl rWa'w { MI , F�K1Mr. CONIa1R TINE «n - ROr`USID CDNIOUR IMf -- - Ir�SRNG fUOF OI PAH Mr NI .. PRonosTo IDGi a PAVFwrRI [Rl"." WAItR IN, «/ HVORANI • VALVE • « w - PROIgBrO WAirR rRlr III/MDRNVI A VNVf sIMR W/ MANHn, R W/ MANunu 14DVOGID N R «/ W61 rv.SM r nsIIRD load MA 1. r.IRIRR: r«w«R Par 11 CDNCRI II Ma1UM1N1 FOUND A ULAII'D INirRSFCrgN / rOUND RRCr CORNER COrKRI IC FI IAXANO WN I. x rRIsr FT- IRA 19451 loP a RAII SP01 Erro+noN N/I NOW OR ORMI.RIY 41'NE 0 w • OOms4 MF in nE IWI[: 5 CV ICTIAIlN Toccc CITE DI AN SCALE: 1' - 20' A TYPE SIZE TREATMENT / TYPE SIZE TREATMENT 1. BALSAM FIR 12" CAL REMOVE 13. LARCH 15" CAL REMAINS 2. GOLDEN WEEPING WILLOW 24" CAL REMAINS 14. APPLE 10" CAL REMOVE 3. BALSAM FIR 6" CAL REMOVE 15. APPLE 12" CAL REMOVE 4. BALSAM FIR 6" CAL REMOVE 16. CHERRY B" CAL REMAINS 5. 6. BOx Ft OFR BALSAM FIR 10" CAL _.- 6" CAL RFMOVF .__ _ ..-_-__ REMOVE 17, APPLE 3' CAL REIOCATF __._--_. __. RELOCATE -_. 18. _....___ _.____._-- APPLE 3" CAL 7. SCOTCH PINE 12" CAL REMAINS 19. 1 APPLE 3" CAL RELOCATE 8. APPLE 8' CAL RELOCATE 20. 1 APPLE 3" CAL RELOCATE 9. APPLE 6" CAL RELOCATE 21. APPLE 3" CAL RELOCATE 10. APPLE 6" CAL RELOCATE 22. SPRUCE (75 TREES APPROX) RELOCATE 11. APPLE 4" CAL RELOCATE 23. CHERRY 6" CAL REMAINS 12. BALSAM FIR 12" CAL REMOVE N/F BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LTD 273/265 - - - - - - TO SOUTH BURLINGTON MUNICIPAL PUMP STATION : of N/F SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 91/26 EVERGREENS RELOCATED FROM NORTH SIDE Or PRO ER Y APPLE TREES RELOCATED FROM NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY ----------- - R 1 SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 91/26 NOTES 1. APPLICANT/OWNER: MALCOLM WILLARD 699 NOB HILL WILLISTON, VT 05495 2. TOPOGRAPHY AND EXISTING FEATURES INFORMATION BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED (MARCH 1989). 3. TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 2.43 ACRES 4. ZONED: INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE (1/0). 5. PARKING: 18.456 S.F. COMMERCIAL OFFICE/250 S.F./SPACE = 74 SPACES REQUIRED 75 SPACES PROVIDED (INCLUDES 2 HANDICAPPED & 1 VAN SPACE) 1 BIKE RACK 6. ALL CONNECTIONS TO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES FROM THE EXISTING HOUSE AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES MUST BE CAPPED, AT OR NEAR PROPERTY LINE, FOLLOWING REMOVAL OF DWELLING. LOCATIONS OF CAPPED ENDS SHAIL RE LOCATFD BY CONTRACTOR FOR INCLUSION IN CERTIFICATION PLANS. 7. RETAINING WALL DESIGN BY OTHERS. 8. FOR LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND EROSION CONTROL, SEE SHEET 5. 9. BUILDING SIZE, SHAPE, AND ORIENTATION AS DIRECTED BY OWNER/AGENT. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING BY OTHERS. 10. TREES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED, RETAINED OR RELOCATED. FOR PROPOSED PLANTINGS, PLEASE SEE PAGE FIVE. LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING PLAN. of OF VFR ♦r yE)NrF��Z h rt u ♦� qNo. 5593 � 43. FCISI E«E�"�(�� C" gb ALPINE DESIGN & ENGINEERING QdCORPORATED (4)7 AEARx RRCN)K W. WWJ6TON �P.RMONT GRAPHIC SCAI.F DRAWN BY: ACR CK'D BY: CPL SCALE: AS NOTED I IN FEE. I I 4se6 - 20 «. ISSUE DATE 8 11 99 JOB NO.: 99016 DO NOT SCALE INFORMATION OFF DRAWINGS. IF INFORMATION IS MISSING OR UNCLEAR, CONTACT �.�� ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION. 1) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership 20 Kimball Ave Suite 202 S. Burlington,Vt. 05403 802-878-0750 b. Applicant Malcolm Willard 802-879-1110 699 Nob Hill Williston, Vt. 05495 C. Contact Malcolm Willard 2) Purposo, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposes use(s). Office Space For Lease,110OHinesburg Road One Lot, One Building 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. Option 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties Summer Ice Development #1150 Ann painter #1070-1080 Burlington Properties Ltd. #1020 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Proposed easement for access road to service the _ lots to the north. 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of I municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. Connections to existing sanitary sewer and water. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: On May2,1989 the Planning Commission approved a plan for an 18,456 sq/ft office building on this site. 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (81 x 11, 81 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record ano applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a comitiercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development. _ (�U' 4" L �-s"� July 13 ,1999 (Signature) applicant or contact person Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership 802-878-0750 20 Kimball Ave Suite 202 S. burlington,Vt. 05403 2) APPLICAt4T (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 802-879-1110 -__- Ma-lcolm WiI I and 699 T\Tn-h T4i 1 1 wi l 1 i Sinn,yt . 0549� 3) CONTAC-1 PERSCA (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) dame as # 2 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1100 Hinesburg Road 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 74-01-25 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Residental _ b) Proposud Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) office 18,456 sa/ft, Two Levels No Qx1iRt in-C 1�Spc �- rewa i n� c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 18,456 new, no existing to remain. d) Haight of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Two Floors e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) None f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): 50 g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): The existing buildings will be removed. On May 2, 1989 thePlanning commission approved an s office building on this site. 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed 9.4 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed 39 c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed 26 _ 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Buildinr ,: $ _ 925, 000 b) Landsc;,r.,ing: $ _ $16 , 750 c) Other site improvem -pots (please list with cost): $185,000 water, sewer, access road, parking, grading, -- retaining wal s, etc. 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Averagt� daily traffic (in and out): 203 b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): 29 c) P.M. Peek hour (In and out): 28 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8am-5pm 11) PEAK LAYS OF OPERATION: Weekdays _ 12) ESTIN , rED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Spring 2000 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan small be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be subn fitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my, knowledge. i SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SuBMISSIoN: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Planning Commission Director, Planning & Zoning have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: IjComplete ® Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (Apfrmsp) EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. • Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) • Survey data (distance and acreage) • Contours (existing and finished) • Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations • Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping • Existi,,g and pruposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways • Zoniny, boundaries • Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) • Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) • Location of septic tanks (if applicable) • Location of any easements • Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard • North arrow • Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date • Exterior lighting details (must be down casting and shielded) • Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) • Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations • If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area proviaed for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ® New application $ 60.00* ❑ Amengment $ 35.00* * Includes $,I0.00 recording fee (Apfrn;sp) � SO a all' n DEPARTMENT OF PIANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 30, 1999 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Re: PUD/1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed is a copy of the October 19, 1999 Development Review Board minutes on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lisa Mahoney, Planning & Zoning Assistant LM/mcp 1 Encl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 23, 1999 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Rd Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed is a copy of the above Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Development Review Board on October 19, 1999. Please note the conditions of approval. If you :have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, �4 Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer j� rJ o� VA 10 , L�7 • - - � -" .mil r - ..: � - a - - - •. _• -.• .. ` - - � •• .�. .(• - .-'(• -•-• •� �r,•, .. - - - _ •` ` is �` - -.` .?.,• ;�' Wit: - _ - •-.. r ~ - - - f - - is - • .:; -� r.:{ - (� - ... - t - - _ ... s '61 m PLANNING COMMISSION 2 May 1989 paqe 5 Members considered the 40 ft. height request and felt the pitched roof was better even at that height. Mr. Belter felt if the Com- mission is goinq to allow higher buildings, it will have to be consistent. Mr. Godard, a neighbor, said he would rather see this building than a filling station and would prefer a pitched roof. He preferred a dense shrub to a fence on the property line and did not want to see a lot of lightinq. He noted that the "No Trucks" siqn on Shunpike Rd. are so faded they do no good and Ryder trucks use it all the time. He said Diqital people do as well, although there has been an attempt to qet them not to. Reqardinq the road upgrade, Mr. Weith felt that at a minimum the pavement needs to be widened and a sidewalk put in. Members pre- ferred takinq an impact fee on the Williston Rd: frontage. They also wanted the City Enqineer to take another look at drainage. Ms. Puqh questioned only $2800 in landscaping being required. Mr. Weith felt existing landscapinq deserved credit but did want some foundation plantings. Mr. Webster said they will come back with a plan. Mr. Weith noted there would be a 1340 foot sidewalk fee for. Williston Rd. frontaqe and a $415 Williston Rd. impact fee. Mr. Belter noted a possible boundary dispute. Mr. Ward said they had this checked and had been shorted 150 ft. This has been corrected. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the application until all informa- tion requested by the Commission is available. Ms. Pugh seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan application of 1100 Hinesburg Rd. Partnership for construction of a 18,456 sq. ft. office building on a 2.43 acre lot, 1100 Hinesburq Rd. Mr. Llewellyn sited the property as .6 miles south of I-89. It slopes from Hinesburq Rd. to the east. Access is a roadway that will line up with access to Oak Creek Villaqe. There will be 75 parkinq spaces, one more than required. Public water and sewer will be used. They have accommodated the Fire Chief's require- ments. The building will be sprinklered. The parking lot will drain off the back side. Mrs. Maher felt something should break up all the pavement in the parking lot. She also questioned how close the cul de sac is to Hinesburq Rd., noting the road will be widened one day and she didn't want the city to have to purchase part of anyone's cul de sac. Mr. Weith didn't see a problem as there are 7 ft. to work No Text PLANNING COMMISSION 2 May 1989 paqe 6 planned with from the planned sidewalk to the edge of the riqht-of-way. Mr. Burgess favored landscape islands that wouldn't increase lot coverage and would look nicer. Mr. Llewellyn said that was OK with them. Mr. Weith addressed the access problem. Mr. Jacob said it would be nice if this lot connected with Swift St. Extension across the back of the 3 small lots. It might make egress from this lot easier. It can't be done now because the proposed access road is not in place, but he wanted the applicant to consider this for the future. Mr. Simson said they would work with the Commission on planninq for it in the future. Sevexal drawings were considered and Mr. Simson said they preferred concept #4. Mr. Weith said a prior shared access riqht-of-way agreement would be needed for concepts 1 or 4. The City Attorney should approve any such easement. Mr. Weith said he would like to preserve the clump of pines in front, if possible. Mr. Wade said he would prefer to move them. Mr. Wade also noted the buildinq would be wood frame, compatible with the residential buildings. Ms. Peacock moved the Commission approve the Site Plan application of 1100 Hinesburq Road Partnership for construction of an 18,456 sq. ft. office building on a 2.43 acre lot as de icted on a site plan titled 1100 Hinesburq Road, Site & Utilities Plan," prepared _y Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc, and dated April, 1989, last revised 4/24/89, with the followinq stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $16,750, 3-year landscaping bond prior to permit. The plan shall be revised to show the existing clump of pines in the front yard to be relocated. Additionally, the north property line shall be relocated elsewhere on the site. The proposed location shall be shown on the plan. 2. The plan shall be revised to show the planned Hinesburq Road right of way, 3. The applicant shall contribute $3,251 to the Hinesburq Road Traffic Improvement Fund based on the 51 peak hour trips to be qenerated by this project. 4. A sewer allocation of 750 qpd is qranted based on an estimated 50 employees. The a prior to permit. cant s 5. The applicant shall contribute $5,044 to the Hinesburq Road sidewalk fund based on the 250 feet of frontaqe on Hinesburq Rd. 6. The applicant shall file an access easement for the properties PLANNING COMMISSION 2 May 1989 paqe 7 to the north. This easement shall be submitted to the City At- torney for approval and recorded in the land records prior to _permit. The proposed location of an access road easement for the properties to the north shall be indicated on the plan. 7. The applicant shall submit a revised plan addressing stipu- lations 1, 2, 6 & 8 to the City Planner for approval prior to permit. 8. The parking layout shall be revised to include landscaped islands. All coverage requirements shall be met. 9. The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Ms. Puqh seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Other Business Ms. Peacock noted that some of the aisles in the new Zayres parkinq lot are only about 21 ft. making it hard to maneuver. Mr. Weith will check on this. Mr. Weith will also check on the Grancy's boat on the corner of Williston Rd. & HInesburq Rd. Members aqreed to consider "other business" earlier in the agenda so it does not qet short-shrifted. Mr. Burqess asked if anythinq has been done about the traffic problem at White St. Mr. Weith talked with the City Enqineer and Roqer Dickinson who suggested a traffic engineer look at it. Mr. Weith said there will be an Executive Session on the Mobil litiqation next week. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 10:30 pm. Clerk CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 15, 1999 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Re: Office Building, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 19, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. SincerO, r Raymond 3. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: October 19, 1999 agenda items Date: October 15, 1999 1) ACM Realty Dated 8/31/99 86 Ethan Allen Drive The building should be sprinklered 2) Malcolm Willard Dated 10/6/99 1100 Hinesburg Road The building should be sprinklered and include an alarm system 3) Burlington International Airport 3064 Williston Road Acceptable 4) Dorset Land Company 415 Dorset Street Acceptable 5) Highlands Development Company, LLC Golf Course Road Acceptable 6) Dorset Square Associates 150 Dorset Street The building should be sprinklered Dated 8/13/99 Dated 8/29/99 Dated 8/30/99 Dated 10/13/999 Memorandum - City Engineer October 19, 1999 agenda items October 4, 1999 Page 2 1100 HINESBURG ROAD - OFFICE BUILDING 1) Storm water runoff should be controlled with a retention basin especially paved area and building. 2) Sidewalk on Hinesburg Road should be considered. This would require State Highway permit. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 AUGUST 1999 6. Sketch plan application of Fairway Estates, LLC to amend a planned residential development consisting of 244 residential units and an 18-hole golf course. The amendment consists of resubdividing lots 1, 2 and 32-37, Nowland Farm Road: Mr. Burke showed the location on the map. He noted there will be no net change in the number of units. They are increasing the size of the footprints of units to accommodate a deck or balcony. All setbacks have been maintained as have distances between buildings. The applicant indicated they could amend the plan so that lot # 1 will meet the 10 ft. side yard setback. Members felt it was OK to go right to final plat review. 7. Sketch plan application of Malcolm Willard for a planned unit development consisting of the construction of an 18,456 sq.' ft. 2-story general office building on a 2.43 acre lot, 1100 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Willard said the plan was previously approved but was never built. The new plan shows a 35 ft. setback to comply with new regulations. They have added a handicapped space as required and also a bike rack. Mr. Willard showed the 30 ft. access that lines up with the property to the north. This involves a right-of-way which he also indicated. Mr. Weith noted there has been discussion of putting in a sidewalk on Hinesburg Rd. Residents are asking for it. The sidewalk would be within the right-of- way. He said he would check with Public Works to see if there is a plan for such a sidewalk. Mr. Dinklage asked if the Board can ask applicants to contribute to a sidewalk fund. Mr. Weith said that can only be done if there is an impact fee ordinance in place, and there is no such ordinance covering sidewalks. In the past, the Planning Commission did some creative things such as requiring a fee toward a sidewalk which the city would then construct. The sidewalk would have to be built within a year. Mr. Willard said they are willing to contribute to a sidewalk as long as it goes somewhere. Mr. Weith noted that a PUD has to go through preliminary and final reviews, but he suggested these could be done at the same time. Members were OK with this. 8. Sketch plan application of John Larkin, Inc., to amend a planned unit development consisting of an existing 89 room hotel and 275 seat restaurant. The amendment consists of constructing an addition to the existing hotel buildings and a new hotel building to add 71 rooms for a total of 160 rooms, 1 Dorset Street: Mr. Llewellyn said the plan would join the two buildings with an addition and there would be another, building in back. They would like to leave the existing right turn lane into Friendly's as an entrance only and leave the other access as it is. In the previous approval, the Planning Commission required the removal of the gatehouse, but the applicant would like to have it remain. 7 SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The r South Burfinotsxf velopment tew Sae a public hearing at the South 'Bur- lington City Hall, Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday October 19, 1999, at7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 11 Application of Burling- ton intemational Airport seeking approval from Section 25.117[b], Al- t e r a tion of Existing Grade, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The request is for permission to remove 700,000 cubic yards of rock, 3064Will- iston Road. 2] Final plat application of Highlands Develop- ment Company, LLC to, amend a previously ap- proved planned residen- tial development consis- ting of 298 residential units and an 18 hole golf course, Dorset Street. The amendment consists of resubdividing lots 126, 127 and 129 to create [21 new reconfigured lots and eliminate one [1] lot. 3] Final plat application of Malcolm Willard for a planned unit' develop- ment consisting of the construction of a 18,456 square toot 2-story gen- eral office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road. 4} Final' plat application of Dorset Square Associ- ates to amend an exist- ing planned unit develop- ment consisting of 54,480 square feet of shopping center use, 150,1 Dorset, Street. The;; amendment consists of construction a 7,000, square foot. retail build- ing along Market Street and construction of streetscape improve- ments along Market Street. 5] Application of Fran & Mary Mazur seeking a variance from Section 26.003, Extension of Nonconforming Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to extend a nonconform- ing single family dwelling by enclosing a 10' x 20' section of an ; existing deck for use as a three 63] season porch, 52 artlett Bay Road. 6j Final' plat application a3 Dorset Land Company to amend a planned unit developine it consisting at a 184 unit congregate housing facility and a 103 unit extended stay hotel in two [2] buildings, 415 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of the relocation of a cool- ing unit pad. Copies of the apptica- tions are available' for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage Chairman t I c: "O1n Q zry n L9 7 In w Z_ LEGEND eKrs}.n9 cent• rnen d Iron pin St+(& rc-rod % n def.neS PrePcrt'f hne — Jef,nes<dQofr:ow. ---- --ban tir rjur✓Q.V r. 1 PAINTER $WILES VOL .I441 PG•83 MALCOLM WILLARD PROPERTY VOL.4GI PG.4S1-2 MAP BK.3G5 PG.84 2.43 Ac. ti 0 n ti 94 Z 0 0 _---------- ---- A944, -- d nry 194.12 GREEN ACRES INC MAP VOL, 365 PAGES 58,ISO, 82,63,`84 .Sc AtE: I' = 20' GRAPHIC SCALE ae o C ix r[a� 1 1 —1, • 20 ft. EMM..R J soUrH BURLING /1 1. �n GREEN ACRES INC VOL 91 PG.96 TE I based on phys,,ai a vidence .d r I;erJ �nJ inrormation absvecte •l end e the( pertinent records and I < ron i-5"rt with that evidence. 1 nrnr sto1;'V..S.A.section140- wwlslon. iq PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, October 19, 1999, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Application of Burlington International Airport seeking approval from Section 25.117(b), Alteration of Existing Grade, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The request is for permission to remove 700,000 cubic yards of rock, 3064 Williston Road. 2) Final plat application of Highlands Development Company, LLC to amend a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 298 residential units and an 18 hole golf course, Dorset Street. The amendment consists of resubdividing lots 126, 127 and 129 to create (2) new reconfigured lots and eliminate one (1) lot. 3) Final plat application of Malcolm Willard for a planned unit development consisting of the construction of a 18,456 square foot 2-story general office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road. 4) Final plat application of Dorset Square Associates to amend an existing planned unit development consisting of 54,480 square feet of shopping center use, 150 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing a 7,000 square foot retail building along Market Street and construction of streetscape improvements along Market Street. 5) Application of Frank & Mary Mazur seeking a variance form Section 26.003, Extension of Nonconforming Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to extend a nonconforming single family dwelling by enclosing a 10' x 20' section of an existing deck for use as a three (3) season porch, 52 Bartlett Bay Road. 6) Final plat application of Dorset Land Company to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 184 unit congregate housing facility and a 103 unit extended stay hotel in two (2) buildings, 415 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of the relocation of a cooling unit pad. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission October 2, 1999 JOHN M. DINSE ROBERT H. ERDMANN MICHAEL B. CLAPP SPENCER R. KNAPP KAREN MCANDREW BARBARA E. CORY ROBERT R. MCKEARIN JAMES W. SPIN JOHN D. MONAHAN, JR. EMILY R. MORROW RITCHIE E. BERGER AUSTIN D. HART DINSE, ERDMAN N & CLAPP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 209 BATTERY STREET P. O. BOX 988 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0988 TELEPHONE 80 2-864-5 7 5 1 TELECOPIER 802-862-6409 April 17, 1990 Mr. Joseph Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Joe: GEORGE A. HOLOCH, JR. STEVEN L. KNUDSON SAMUEL HOAR, JR. PETER N. FODOR NOAH PALEY ROBERT L. SAND SANDRA A. STREMPEL DAVID J. SPIELMAN Pursuant to our conversation today I am enclosing a draft agreement between the City of South Burlington and 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership. The agreement contemplates conveyance of the required easement at a point in time prior to issuance of a Cer- tificate of Occupancy. It is important that the partnership be able to develop their property in accordance with the site plan approval of May 2, 1989. Therefore, I have drafted the agreement such that the partnership will still be able to take advantage of the maximum lot coverages afforded it notwithstanding the easement. I will be out of the office for the next week. I would ask that in my absence, you contact Austin Hart in order to resolve any questions or difficulties regarding the agreement. It is my understanding from a conversation with ray clients, that this agreement should be in place no later than May 2, 1990. I would appreciate your immediate attention to this matter. I have for- warded a copy of the agreement to Steve Stitzel, Esq. for his review. Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, DINSE, ERDMANN & CLAPP o� Peter N. Fodor PNF:eliz Enclosure cc: Jon Simson AGREEMENT TO CONVEY EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of April, 1990, by and between 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership (the "Partnership") and the City of South Burlington ("South Burlington"). WHEREAS, South Burlington approved the Site Plan application of the Partnership for construction of an 18,456 sq. ft. office building on a 2.43 acre lot owned by the Partnership and adjacent to Hinesburg Road in the City of South Burlington, all as shown on a site plan entitled 111100 Hinesburg Road, Site & Utilities Plan" (the "Site Plan"); and WHEREAS, this Site Plan approval was conditioned upon the Partnership conveying an easement for mutual access (the "Easement") for the benefit of certain properties situated to the north of that depicted on the Site Plan; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises and covenants made in this agreement, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 1. The aforementioned condition to Site Plan approval shall be deemed satisfied if at a time suitable for the Partner- ship, but prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by South Burlington, the Partnership conveys the Easement for the benefit of properties situated to the north of those depicted on the Site Plan. The properties benefiting from this Easement shall be identified by the parties hereto and described in Ex- hibit A to this Agreement. The Easement shall be generally depicted on the final Site Plan as a thirty (30) foot wide right-of-way entering the land and premises of the Partnership from Hinesburg Road at the southwest corner of said land and premises and shall generally follow the southerly boundary of said land and premises past the parking area depicted on the Site Plan before turning north to provide access to those properties identified in Exhibit A. 2. Notwithstanding the conveyance of the Easement by the Partnership, the Partnership shall be able to develop the land and premises in accordance with the Site Plan as approved by the Planning Commission of South Burlington on May 2, 1989. The Easement shall not reduce the allowable lot coverage for this project, or in any way affect the standard setback requirements for this zone or project. 3. The Partnership shall not incur any costs or expenses in the development of the Easement beyond those which are necessary for the completion of the project as approved on the Site plan. The Easement shall contain covenants requiring the grantees to share in an equitable manner the cost of building and maintaining ant roadway constructed within the Easement. 4. The Partnership shall have the authority to locate the Easement so as to eliminate the need for alterations to the Site Plan as approved on May 2, 1989. 5. In the event the conveyance of the Easement results in a violation of any zoning by-law or regulation, or any ordinance or rule or regulation of any other governing body of South Bur- lington , such by-law, rule, ordinance or regulation shall be deemed satisfied by South Burlington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written. IN THE PRESENCE OF: City of South Burlington by: 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership by: Memorandum — DRB August 3, 1999 July 30, 1999 Dumpsters: The dumpsters on the Cheesetraders property should be placed behind the building or placed within a screened area. This should be shown on the revised plans. Other: - any areas for outside display should be shown on the plan. If green space is used, it must be considered covered area for coverage purposes. 6) FAIRWAY ESTATES LLC-RESUBDIVISION-SKETCH PLAN This project consists of amending a planned residential development consisting of 244 residential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of resubdividing lots 1,2, and 32-37. The lots being resubdivided are located on Nowland Farm Road and Four Sisters Road. These "foot print" lots are being increased in size to accommodate larger building footprints created by adding decks to the buildings. Setbacks: All the residential lots will meet the setback requirements with the exception of lot #1 which will not meet the 10 foot side yard setback requirement. Lot size: All the lots which are a part of this application do not meet the minimum lot size requirement of 12,000 sq. ft. The Planning Commission modified the regulations to allow these smaller lots. All the lots involved will be increased in size as a result of the resubdivision. 7) MALCOLM WILLARD-OFFICE BUILDING -SKETCH PLAN This project consists of a planned unit development consisting of the construction of a 18,456 square foot 2-story general office building on a 2.43 acre lot. The property is currently developed with a single family dwelling which will be removed. This same office building was approved on 5/2/89 (minutes enclosed) but was never built. This property located at 1100 Hinesburg Road lies within the IO District. It is bounded on the north by a residence, on the east and south by an undeveloped industrial park, and on the west by Hinesburg Road. Access/circulation: Access is proposed to be via a 30 ft. curb cut on Hinesburg Road. A 30 foot r.o.w. is being reserved through this property to provide future access to the properties to the north. The last time this was approved, the Planning Commission recommended a concept that a service road would provide access for this property and the three (3) properties to the north. It would have one (1) curb cut on Hinesburg Road and one (1) on Swift St. Extension. 7 Memorandum — DRB August 3, 1999 July 30, 1999 Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 9.4% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 39% (maximum allowed is 50%). Overall coverage information should include a 24 foot wide sheet in the 30 foot r.o.w. Front yard coverage is 26% (maximum allowed is 30%). The front yard coverage should be measured from the planned r.o.w. line. The 15 ft. required green strip along the front should be measured from the proposed r.o.w. line. Setback requirements are met. Parking: A total of 74 spaces are required and 75 spaces including three (3) handicapped spaces and a bike rack are being provided. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $16,750. The preliminary plat plans shall include a detailed landscaping plan. Traffic: ITE estimates that this proposed office building will generate 24.5 additional vehicle trip ends vte's. Lighting: The preliminary plat submittal should include exterior lighting details. Access easement: The applicant should record an access easement for the properties to the north to enable them to use the 30 ft. r.o.w. through this property. Sidewalk: The 1989 approval required the developer to contribute to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund. The City is no longer collecting fees for this fund. The Board should decide whether to require the applicant to construct a sidewalk. Dumpsters: A screened dumpster storage area is provided. Others: - the note on the plan should be revised to note the correct zoning district. 8) JOHN LARKIN INC.-HOTEL EXPANSION -SKETCH PLAN This property consists of amending a planned unit development consisting of an existing 89 room hotel and 275 seat restaurant. The amendment consists of constructing an addition to the existing hotel buildings and a new hotel building to add 71 rooms for a total of 160 rooms. The Planning Commission approved a 71 room expansion on 4/28/98 (minutes enclosed) which involved only adding to the existing buildings. 8 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, March 8, 1988, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Revised final plat of Dorset Square Associates for a planned commercial development consisting of conversion of Earl's Bicycle Shop to multiple retail shops in conjunction with existing Dorset Square Mall. Property is bounded on the north by Corporate Way owned by South Burlington Realty and Lodging North, Inc. on the east by China Lite Restaurant owned by S. Poon, on the south by R.E. Wood, D. Arnold, R.W. Realty and South Burlington Realty and on the west by Dorset Street and is located at 150 Dorset Street. 2) Revised final plat by Harold Bensen for amendment to the plan to include 16 garage and storage units in addition to existing apartment dwellings. Property is bounded on the north by City of South Burlington and Myers, on the south by J. Heisse, Parsons and Sons, Merchants Properties, Inc., and Zachary's, on the west by Jarvis and on the east by Patchen Road and is located at 1 Executive Drive. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. February 20, 1988 Peter L. Jacob Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission 1 �,,Ja cK" Ill. - J'�� 15 -�� l5 ; Ur w- :9-�3') a5 vum�x� 3- .�5r Y h �6eo ( _3 , a(.9aC( x a.s c.p��3 J City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 April 28, 1989 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership 20 Kimball Avenue Suite 202 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Sir/Madame: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also en- closed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, May 2, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. 7'erel y Joe Weith, City Planner Encls cc: Bruce Wade Lance Llewellyn JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 June 19, 1989 Mr. Bruce Wade C.S. Architects 7 Kilburn Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Wade: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the May 2, 1989 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please meet the stipulations contained in the approval motion before applying for a building permit. Please call if you have any questions. S' rely, Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl cc: Lance Llewellyn JW/mcp 5/2/89 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership for construc- tion of an 18,456 square foot office building on a 2.43 acre lot as depicted on a site plan titled "1100 Hinesburg Road, Site & Utilities Plan," prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. and dated April, 1989, last revised 4/24/89, with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $16,750,.,,3"-year landscaping bond prior to permit. The plan shall be revised to show the existing clump of pines in the front yard to be , n,_-e-,L_-mod . Additionally, the existing apple trees in the front yard and pine trees along the north property line shall be relocated elsewhere on the site. The proposed location shall be shown on the plan. 2. The plan shall be revised to show the planned Hinesburg Road right of way. 3. The applicant shall contribute $3,251 to the Hinesburg Road Traffic Improvement Fund based on the 51 peal{ hour trips to be generated by this project. 4. A sewer allocation of 750 gpd is granted based on an estimat- ed 50 employees. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. 5. The applicant shall contribute $5,044 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on the 250 feet of frontage on Hinesburg Road. rr 6. The applicant shallv'the properties to the north. This agreement shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the land records prior to permit. The proposed location of an access road Lie-- the properties to the north shall be indicated on the plan. 7. The applicant shall submit a revised plan addressing stipulations 1, 2 aavd 6 to the City Planner for approval prior to permit. X. The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. , ..� )c�.�ov- sl�„�.�tt i evIsam- �A�C+ti 6Qt Q/ S��jp+r..� e_ rG,•/r't�..� x4"' PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 February 5, 1990 Mr. John Simson Hinesburg Road Partnership 20 Kimball Avenue Suite 202 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Simson: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, /'j 2 Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl October 24, 1989 Joe Wyeth City Planner South Burlington City Hall Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Wyeth: On behalf of the 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership, I hereby request a 6 month extension to our approval of construction of an office building on that site. Our plans are to proceed with construction in 1990 with all specifications as approved by the planning commission on May 2nd, 1989. Sincep9ly yours, G.//Simsb5i, CLU or the Hinesburg Road Partnership City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 October 26,1989 Mr. John Simson Hinesburg Road Partnership 20 Kimball Avenue Suite 202 South Burlington, Vermont. 05401 Re: Office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Simson: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 The Planning Commission at its 10/24/89 meeting, approved your request for a 6 month extension in which to obtain a building permit for the above referenced project. Please note the build- ing permit must be obtained by May 2, 1990 or this approval is null and void. Please call if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp '4C*FSTATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION j O 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05602 'A,9�SPOR,P�`O July 19, 1989 Mr. Roger Dickinson Fitzpatrick Llewelleyn Inc. 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495________._..__. _. Rp-" South Burlington, VT 116, L.S. 105+50 RT 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear er: We have completed a review of your traffic impact evaluation for the above referenced project and disagree with your conclusion relative to the left turn lane. We find that a left turn lane will be warranted. You should develop detailed plans for a left turn lane, and submit to this office for approval. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, /wx� 0�& William 0. Fisk Utilities Engineer WOF:DA:kf cc: Utility File C>A Town of South Burlington John Wood, DTA #5 Ed Stanak, District Env. Coord. #5 �/ �Ctl'l FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCQ' )RATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 ' s !� • � s �/ �f1��f1 DATE 4 , Z 5 , S� JOB NO. �� O ATTENTION RE: Yzi-ek WE ARE SENDING YOU (_Attached ❑ Under separate cover via AA�`Ik,L.Q_& �.'N the following items: ❑ Shop drawings X Prints Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION e t 11 k 3 1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ❑ Approved as submitted For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY PRODUCT 240-2 Inc., Groton, Mass. 01471. ' SIGNED: , �1 �CL O�x If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at ona._. C , utb N urhugtvu N trr D )e�,.'am Cltt � f �575 Dorset -97tect �r §§uutb +ISurlington, lgermnnt 05493 (802) 658-7960 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE TUESDAY MAY 2,1989 AGENDA ITEMS WEDNESDAY APRIL 26,1989 1100 HINESBURG ROAD OFFICE COMPLEX PLANS REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT ON A SET OF PLANS DATED APRIL 89 PROJECT # 89030 FOR A NEW OFFICE BUILDING. AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION. 2. EUGENE WARD OFFICE BUILDING 3065 WILLISTON ROAD 3. PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME THERE IS NO WAY WE COULD GIVE PROPER FIRE PROTECTION. ACCESS IS BAD AND MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED ON THE WATER SYSTEM AND HYDRANTS LOCATION. LINDENWOOD INN SHELBURNE ROAD ADDITION PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME THE ONLY PROBLEM I SEE AT THIS TIME IS ONE HYDRANT IS REQUIRED AT THE MAIN DRIVE TO THE PROPERTY. 4. WHITE STREET CONDOS 125 WHITE STREET PLANS REVIEWED DATED REVISED 3-20-89 AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION. - �v l5 x x x NOTES i >V )1. ALL y / / 2. FAILED A' i scA G I �vl C, I/ 1 r �15T 1 °JCIL>y1�& Nnw-/ Common N(, mb ib I VP cord lei Pirtn,� 5trobt� Whyte, P►n� -- 0�}"/ l o raxirux-� per► IvAr>^ cc+ MG w+ll5 5eedl�v Ash 3"eAt. f >�P, a��= 21 >`/v rftkd 5eMlA-,� 3 "kxd 'ter ' l� COryvv allay l6biric*' Cotoneavlr horixhtoUav Jumi" r*Mne ),5k, 'Sea Green' 5b ' jenr Crawp�w W- wiq cogwGc� toc*- CotmeavW r tea C-- mn an pr 4. 5. 6. TO THE 1 ALL PLAI ACCEPTA LANDSCA: ALL PLAT SEASONS CONTRAC' MATERIAL ALL WORI NURSERY! TREE AND SHI 1. ALL DEC CONTAIN ACCORANI 2. CONTAIN MULCHED 3. SPACING APPROVA 4. FERTILI'. APPLIED OF COMM AT THE 5. ALL THE COW MAN SHALL 8 t5°x•� PA►Ti .`� /2 = ; z 6 s AROUND -� SEEDING OF 2"CAl� FjDJ ' Not,- m TxIN ofb 'ir)ollwlZ on in- rrvke/ manor 'vbtr t7 *v in �CW if 1'I�.�OiyJoli�/. 1. DESIGN; SHALL 1 SL OP I N! S C Rf C SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENTog AS 575 DORSET STREET t • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 /j?Q John M. Race. Chief -- Telephone (802) 658-/050 TO KEEP KIDS OFF DRUGS Marc Companion Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated One Wentworth Drive Williston,VT 05495 26 April 1989 Dear Mr. Companion, I have no objection to the proposed industrial building palnned for 1100 Hinesburg Rd provided the businesses in the building are of the type which generate low volumes of police calls such as professional offices.Retail space or tavern type businesses would tax the police department resources. / 1 Ver �Ptily Y rs John M. Race Chief of Police Central District 3 - East of San Tlr i va Beginning at a point at the north as the northwestern corner of a lot a easterly for a distance of 233. 3 boundary of the lot to the north ea t southerly for a distance of appro i eastern boundaries of lots on the e to a point at the south eastern cor Drive. Then proceeding westerly for a point. Then proceeding north for a down the center line of the San Remo the point of beginning. t end of San Remo Drive at t #16 San Remo and going feet along the northern corner of it. Then turning mat ely 1740 feet along the stern side of San Remo Drive er of a lot at #70 San Remo distance of 226.85 feet to distance approximately 1730 rive right-of-way back to Central District 3 - Eastern End of Corporate Circle: Beginning at a point at the southwest orner of the Chastenay propery at 97 'nesburg Road and proce ,ng easterly along the Corporate Circl b unitary a distance of a proximately 420 feet to a point. The t\an utherly approximately 150 feet to a point. Then t rnrly approximat ly 80 feet along the northerly bound ry Corporate Wa right-of-way; then turning southerl the Corporate Way right-of-way, a distance of 80 fontinuing southe ly 90.96 feet to a point on the south ry of Corporate Y. Central District = Western N4de of Dorset Beginning at a point the nort rn property li e of University Mall and the souther property 1' e of the lot at #225 Dorset Street, approximately 3 feet from the Dorset S reet right-of- way and proceeding east ly along sai line appr imately 156 to the center line of Dorse Street. The turning southerly and proceeding a distance of proximately 14 feet own the center line of Dorset Street to th center line of Road. Then turning westerly approximatel 153 feet to a point. Continuing northerly a distance of approximately 1433 feet along the western boundaries of the easterly lots along Dorset Street, to the point of beginning. Central District 3 - Western Side of Dorset Street - South of Sherry Road (Deslaurier property) Beginning at a point 290 feet westerly of the Dorset Street right-of-way at the southwest corner of Sherry Road and continuing easterly 323 feet to the center line of Dorset. Street. Then turning south for a distance of approximately 850 feet down the center line of Dorset Street to a point. Then turning westerly for a distance of 290 feet, along the southern boundary of the GMP substation and the land at 421 Dorset Street owned by DeslaT,irier to a point. 'Then turning northerly and proceeding 850 feet back to the point, of beginning. 2 1 State of Vermont y iM AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Department of Fish and Wildlife Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Natural Resoa001H rces Conservation Council 1inesburg Road Partnership 2n a Vie:, Suite 202 South Burlington, VT 05403 1-879-6563 June 30, 1989 RE: Application WW-4-0129; Proposed 18,456 square foot building, Vermont Route 116, South Burlington, VT. Gentlemen, Our office has completed an initial review of the above referenced project and has determined that the additional information listed below will be needed before approval can be granted. (1) Please submit a copy of the "letter of approval" from the Department of Health for the water main extensions. Please submit two copies of any revised plans. Please note that no construction is granted until written approval is issued by the Division and all other authorities. Please address resubmitted information to the appropriate engineer. Upon receipt of the above items, .we shall continue our review. Should there be any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer CC: City of South Burlington Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. C� n,- s--64 Memorandum - Planning May 2, 1989 agenda items April 28, 1989 Page 3 foot high stockade fence. Additionally, foundation plantings should be installed to dress up the building. Parking: The project requires 60 spaces and 60 are proposed. Traffic: The site is located in Zone 5 of the Traffic Overlay District. Maximum permitted trips per peak hour are 55 based on lot size (1.13 acres). ITE data estimates 44 P.M. peak hour trip ends for a general office building of this size. Sewer: A sewer allocation of 750 gpd is granted. This is based on an estimate of 50 employees. 4) OFFICE BUILDING. 1100 HINESBURG ROAD 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership proposes to construct a 18,456 square foot, 2 story office building on a 2.43 acre parcel on Hinesburg Road. A single-family home currently exists on the site and would be razed. The property is zoned Industrial -Agricultural. Business/profes- sional office uses are permitted in the district on pre-existing lots of 3 acres or less. The property is bounded on the south and east by vacant property (Goodrich) , on the north by a sin- gle-family residence, and on the west by Hinesburg Road. A single-family residence is located directly across Hinesburg Road to the west. Setbacks/Coverage: The plan meets all setback requirements. The front yard setback from Hinesburg Road is 50 feet from the planned r.o.w. The planned r.o.w. should be shown on the plan. Proposed building coverage is 9.4% (20 % maximum allowed) and total lot coverage is 39% (40% maximum allowed). Access/Circulation: Access to the project is provided by a 24 foot wide curb cut on Hinesburg Road located directly across the entrance to Oak Creek Village. This 24 foot wide drive runs along the southern border of the property to a parking lot locat- ed in the rear of the building. A drop-off turn around is locat- ed in front of the building. The Planning Commission should take this opportunity to plan access to all three small lots located in this area along Hines- burg Road. I feel it is important that the number of curb cuts on Hinesburg road be minimized. Enclosed are several sketches 3 Memorandum - Planning May 2, 1989 agenda items April 28, 1989 Page 4 representing possible access arrangements. Each alternative would require access agreements except for alternative 4. Alter- native 4 would require land dedication by Peter Pollack and Ralph Goodrich. Because of timing, I would omit alternative 3. Parking: The project requires 74 parking spaces. The plan shows 66 standard sized spaces and 9 compact car spaces, 75 total. The compact spaces account for 12% of the total. The Planning Com- mission may approve up to 25%. I feel the parking in the rear is a good aesthetic design aspect, especially for Hinesburg Road which is a high volume roadway. This design aspect should be encouraged for all developments along Hinesburg Road ,/ y Traffic: Based on I.T.E. trip generation rates, this project would gener,ate„!ke peak hour trips during the peak hour. Based on (trips, trips, the applicant will be required to contribute the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive intersection improve- ment fund. This fee is based on the assumption that trip distri- bution from the site is 100% to and from the north. Landscaping: The project requites $16,750 in new landscaping. The plan proposes white pine, sugar maple, ash, crabapple, dog- wood, cotoneaster and juniper. The plan is valued at $16,500. There is an existing clump of mature pines in the front yard which appear to be healthy and would not be impacted by the building and turn -out location. Should these be preserved? Additionally, there are several small apple trees (I think) in the front yard and about 10-15, 5 foot high pine trees along the north property line. The plan shows these to be removed. I feel they should instead be relocated elsewhere on the site, perhaps along the south property line. Sidewalk: The applicant will be required to contribute to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk improvement fund. I will provide the amount of the fee at the meeting. Other: A sewer allocation of 750 gpd is granted. This is based on an estimate of 50 employees. See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. 4 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: May 2, 1989 agenda items Date April 28, 1989 2) WHITE STREET CONDOS, 125 WHITE STREET The Site Plan titled "White Street Condos" revised 3/20/89 is acceptable. 3) WARD OFFICE BUILDING. SHUNPIKE ROAD - WILLISTON ROAD 1. Shunpike Road is very substandard. It should be improved along the frontage of this property because of the increase in the volume of traffic. The improvements should include widening the road to a 15 foot lane with curbs and drainage. There should also be a turning lane at Williston Road to allow for traffic to turn east and west. Also a sidewalk along Shunpike Road should be constructed. 2. There exists a boundary discrepancy between the Ready proper- ty which should be corrected. 4) OFFICE BUILDING. 1100 HINESBURG ROAD 1. There should be a sidewalk assessment in lieu of constructing one on the frontage of this site. 2. The access to Hinesburg Road is ideal at this location be- cause it is opposite to a major subdivision, the owner should anticipate sharing that drive if for some reason access is re- quested from the land to the south with approval of the Planning Commission. IX M E M. O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Plann.i_rw, Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: December 6, 1988 agenda items Date: December 2, 1988 2 PUBLIC HEARING: SPEAR STREET SCENIC OVERLOOK DISTRICT As a result of a petition filed by Save the View, Inc. , the Planning Commission is required to hold a legally warned Public Hearing to consider making permanent the Interim Zoning Ordinance for the Spear Street View Protection Zone. Steve Stitzel has informed me that the Planning Commission must make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed amendment. He said any recommendation is appropriate. Accompanied with the recommendation should be reasons supporting why the particular recommendation was made. Enclosed are copies of the minutes from Planning Commission meetings at which the view protection zone was discussed. 3) CHRISTOPHER DUNN, OFFICE COMPLEX, 1100 HINESBURG ROAD Christopher Dunn proposes to construct a 14,900 square foot office complex on a 2.46 acre lot at 1100 Hinesburg Road. A 1,700 square foot single-family home currently exists on the site. This house would be rehabilitated and converted to office use. A new 13,200 square foot office building would be constructed in back of the house. This building would be one story and be compatible in architectural style. The property is zoned Industrial -Agricultural. Business/professional office uses are permitted in the district on pre-existing lots of 3 acres or less. However, multiple buildings are not allowed. The applicant will have to get a waiver from the zoning board in order to put more than one building on this lot. Under the City's current zoning regulations, I see two options for the applicant. One option is to add onto the existing structure. However, the existing structure is non -conforming (violates front ,yard setback) and, as a result, the applicant would only be allowed to do improvements totaling 25% of the fair market value. The other option is to raze the existing home and construct an office building within required setbacks which then is subject only to normal restrictions of density, coverage, etc. The applicant feels the existing structure is important both historically and architectually, and therefore prefers not to 1 Memorandum - P1r_cnn i riy <)ecembe r 6 , 1 988 agenda i Le: HIS 1)ecember 2, 1988 Pago 2 demolish it. However, improvements limited to 25% of the fair market value would not allow the applicant to construct at a density he desires. Therefore, he has elected to present this plan to the Planning Commission and see if the Commission supports his efforts and then request a waiver from the Zoning Board. Access/Circulation: Access for the project, would be provided by a 20 foot wide curb cut on Hinesburg Road. The location of the access drive would be directly across from the entrance to Oak Creek Village. Circulation would be provided along the south property line to the back parking lot located behind the buildings. Setbacks/Coverage: The existing house does not meet front ,yard setback requirements. The new building meets setback requirements. Buildings, total lot and front yard coverage requirements are met. Parking: The project requires 53 parking spaces. The plan shows a 51 space parking lot behind the new building and an 8 space lot between the new building and the existing structure. A total of 59 spaces are shown. Landscaping: The project requires $10,500 in landscaping. The plan shows sugar maple, yellow wood, ash, red oak and white cedar. The plan is valued at $13,160. The plan shows 8 northern red oak within the estimated planned right of way of Hinesburg Road. These trees should be located on the applicant's property outside the future Hinesburg Road right of way. Traffic: Based on I.T.E. trip generation rates, this project would generate 43 trips during the peak hour. Based on these 43 trips, the applicant will be required to contribute $2,677 to the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive intersection improvement fund. This fee is based on the assumption that trip distribution from the site is 100% northbound. Other: I feel it is important to carefully consider the historic aspect of this project. If the Coffin house is indeed considered an historically important structure, I feel the City should make an effort to work with the developer to preserve this structure. This may entail making certain concessions, such as allowing multiple structures on this lot. I will do some research to see if this house is documented anywhere as a historically important structure. Also, I will try and find out if the City is legally allowed to make certain concessions based on historic value. Rol PLANNING COMMISSION 6 DECEMBER 1988 PAGE 3 mended. As a second prefer it be recommended the Council adopt the exact proposal Mrs Maher recommended. Mr. Belter seconded. The motion was defeated 1-5 with only Mr. Burgess voting in favor. Mr. Belter then moved the Commission recommend that it the previous recommendation sent to the Craig seconded. Motion passed 4-2 with Pugh opposing. City Council Mrs. Maher and favors Mr. Ms. Mr. Dumont said it was doing the voters a disservice by giving them something to vote on that no one is happy with. He stressed that if the interim zoning goes back to the Council as is, it will not be possible to remove the Ratkus lot #1 from it, and the Save the View Committee feels this lot could be removed. Sketch Plan application of Christopher Dunn for construction of a 14,900 sq. ft. office complex on a 2.46 acre lot, 1100 Hinesburg Rd. John Simpson and Mr. Dunn presented their plan. Mr. Simpson said they have made an offer on the property which has been accepted. They will buy it if they can get approvals. Mr. Dunn said the house is very close to the road which is not good for a family dwelling but would be OK for commercial use. The property is south of I-89, across from Oak Creek Village. It slopes to the east, and there are excellent mountain views. There is a zoning problem based on the rule that a small lot can have only one building on it. The existing building is too close to the road. If they just add on to the present building, they can add only 25% of the building value. A new building would require tearing down the existing one which he felt didn't make sense as it is a usable building and a piece of the City's history. Mr. Belter asked the condition of the house. Mr. Dunn said it is very good with only minor problems. He anticipated they would have 2 or possibly 4 tenants in the building. Mr. Weith noted the Commission has, in the past, approved buildings with a breezeway between them. Mrs. Maher said she was upset by the large parking lot and the start of strip development on Hinesburg Rd. She said this is not what the Commission had in mind and she felt it is wrong. She pre- dicted that 20 years from now people will ask: "Where was the Planning Commission when this happened?" She noted that the Vermont Historical Society has said this piece of land and its buildings are of historical interest. Other members agreed that the present building should go given all that is planned for the back of the lot. Mr. Weith recommended the access be from the back of the lot when the road over the PLANNING COMMISSION 6 DECEMBER 1988 PAGE 4 Goodrich property is developed and that there be no curb cut on Hinesburg Rd. Mr. Jacob noted Hinesburg Rd. will be widened and the current house would be too close to the road. Ms. Painter, owner of the adjacent duples, asked the Commission to consider what is already there and the affect such a development would have on it. Mrs. Maher felt the proposed parking lot is too close to the Painter lot. Mr. Craig suggested Mr. Dunn find another layout for the parking lot. 4. Discussion of Land Use Section of the Regional Plan Mr. Weith cited 4 main conflicts between the County plan and the City's Master Plan: a) Hinesburg Road/I-89 where the County plan proposes residential use and the City plan is for industrial use. b) I-89/Patchen Rd/Williston Rd. triangle: where the County plan shows major open space and the City plan is for commercial and residential development; c) Ethan Allen Dr./Poor Farm Rd: where the County plan shows a large area of agricultural reserve and the City Plan shows open space and some residential; d) Southeast Quadrant south of Holmes Rd. Extension: where the County plan shows agricultural reserve and the city plan shows agricultural/rural residential. This would be consistent with the County plan, but the Zoning Ordinance allows 2 units per acre on parcels of 50 or more acres which Mr. Weith did not feel was rural residential. Members briefly discussed these items. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:55 pm. Clerk DUNN ASSOCIATt Landscape Architects 117-119 St. Paul Street BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 862-0098 TO South Burlington Planning Comm Citv Hall — Dorset Street ILIETTLA oU "TIEUSEUTTIL DATE Nov. 29, 1988 JOB NO. 18850 ATTENTION Joe Whaite RE- 1100 Hinesburg Road WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached CN Under separate cover via Courier the following items: ❑ Shop drawings EX Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 5 11-23-88 Site Plan THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval 7 For your use El Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Please call if you have any questions. COPY TO SIGNED: Chris Dunn PRODUCT zoo-z � Inc., GMan, Mass 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. M E M O R A N D U M '1'o: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: December 6, 1988 agenda items Date: December 2, 1988 2 )C COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT,_ 1100 HINESBU_RG ROAD 1. If the south (Goodrich) desires access to Hinesburg Road, it should be shared with this development and this developer should anticipate that possibility. Also, it may be beneficial for this property and the property to the north to connect to this parking lot when and if it develops to a commercial use. 2. There is a existing sewer line across this property, it should be located and shown on the plans. 1 MEMO TO: Joe Weith, City Planner FROM: Sue Messina, Water Supt. DATE: November 30, 1988 RE: 1100 Hinesburg Road Before I can determine the impact this project will have on the South Burlington water system and its users in the southest quadrant, I will need the following information.: 1. A plan for site utilities (specifically water and sewer) including true elevations. 2. Fire flow requirements for the project. 3. Estimated daily water consumption. vile., ., K . �t City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 December 2, 1988 Mr. Chris Dunn Dunn Associates 117 St. Paul Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Office complex, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Dunn: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also enclosed are Bill Szymanski's and -Sue Messina's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 6, 1988 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, oe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls �niutij lil tirlingtllll -V ize Department 575 Dariiet �trcct ` 'Qlrt�j �Bitrlingtrm, Uertnnllt 054111 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 1. 2. SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE DECEMBER .13,1988 AGENDA ITEMS DECEMBER 6,1988 REYES PROPERTY SHELBURNE ROAD OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE ONLY PROBLEM I SEE AT THIS TIME IS AT LEAST TWO (2) HYDRANTS ARE NEEDED AT THE LOCATION MARKED ON THE PLAN. 3060 ASSOCIATION 3060 WILLISTON ROAD PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME THE FOLLOWING IS NEED FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION: A. ROAD TO FRONT PARKING LOT AND TO GET TO FIRE LANE MUST BE AT LEAST 24' WIDE TO ALLOW EMERGENCY EQUIP. IN. B. AT LEAST ONE HYDRANT SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY THE FRONT ENTRANCE NEAR THE DRIVE TO THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST 3. DUNN ASSOCIATES 1100 HINESBURG ROAD PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND THE FOLLOWING IS NEEDED FOR FIRE PROTECTION: A. A BETTER ACCESS AROUND BUILDING FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT B. AT LEAST TWO (2) HYDRANTS ON THE PROPERTY AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT. TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 2. �otttlj T-6tirlingtou +h'irc Dcparttnctit 51-5 Durtict street tittth Nurlittgtun, If ermout 115,1111 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE DECEMBER 13,1988 AGENDA ITEMS DECEMBER 63,1988 REYES PROPERTY PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE ONLY PROBLEM I SEE AT THIS TIME IS AT LEAST TWO (2) HYDRANTS ARE NEEDED AT THE LOCATION MARKED ON THE PLAN. 3060 ASSOCIATION 3060 WILLISTON ROAD PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME THE FOLLOWING IS NEED FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION: A. ROAD TO FRONT PARKING LOT AND TO GET TO FIRE LANE MUST BE AT LEAST 24' WIDE TO ALLOW EMERGENCY EQUIP. IN. B. AT LEAST ONE HYDRANT SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY THE FRONT ENTRANCE NEAR THE DRIVE TO THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST DUNN ASSOCIATES 1100 HINESBURG ROAD PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND THE FOLLOWING IS NEEDED FOR FIRE PROTECTION: A. A BETTER ACCESS AROUND BUILDING FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT B. AT LEAST TWO (2) HYDRANTS ON THE PROPERTY AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT. WATER DEPARTMENT" .103 QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD SOUTF-I BURL INGTON. VERMONT 05403 TEL. 864-4361 y MEMO TO: Joe Weith, City Planner FROM: Sue Messina, Water Supt. 15we1 DATE: November 30, 1988 RE: 1100 Hinesburg Road Before I can determine the impact this project will have on the South Burlington water system and its users in the southest quadrant, I will need the following information: 1. A plan for site utilities (specifically water and sewer) including true elevations. 2. Fire flow requirements for the project. 3. Estimated daily water consumption. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 May 15, 1989 Skip McClellan Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office building, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Skip: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are my notes regarding the approval motion for the above referenced project. Please keep in mind that the exact wording of the approval motion may be slightly different. I will send the 5/2/89 minutes as soon as they are available. Also enclosed is a sketch of the proposed access easement which should be shown on the plan. A note should be included which indicates that the exact location of the easement will be deter- mined upon further development. of the lots to the north. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. cerely, Joe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 May 15, 1989 Mr. Lance Llewellyn Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office Building, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Lance: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 The above referenced project will be served by the municipal water and sewer system. The usage is estimated at 750 g.p.d. This amount can be supplied by the City. The sewage will be treated at our Airport Parkway Treatment Plant which has suffi- cient reserve capacity to treat this volume. Sincerely, (/t/� ,��% 2, `7z-2, Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 January 4, 1989 Chris Dunn Dunn Associates 117 St. Paul Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Office Complex, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Dunn: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the December 6, 1988 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 1'2, Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) _f (M_ DUn nAsoc, 1 3) CONTACT PERSON ( name, address, phone #) Ch rl JLQ_n_G/,Dbonn % 0 I(A V 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ��� -� nb.�J 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE (S) rb ,rdtC .d 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # unit , maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) -14 . c-f UI 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9).LOT COVERAGE: building ZO _%; landscaped areas building, parking, outside storage4D__% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 0 Q , Landscaping $A-Q-00 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $____-_._. 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 1 2) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon _10 -_; 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. —; 2-3 p.m. -- 3-4 p.m. �Q- ; 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m._]_O__; p.m.b i --- 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 1r_d 5-P- rn-: - 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION:- Y 11 _ -r �— 1'�1-1 DATE OF SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF' APPLICANT DATE 0F IIEARING { PLEASE SUBMIT I•'IVF: COPIES OF 1'HF, SITE PLAN wi,mi 'rtlF. FOLLOWING INFORMATION Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if pc>ssihl.e.) Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. ( This requires •separate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces) Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street * and lot North arrow. Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. 'l_ STATE OF VERMONT plv ion for Historic Preservation lbruhelier, VT 05602 1116TORIC SITES & STRUCTURES SURVEY l di;vidual Structure Survey Form �!'tY_: _ Chittenden UN: South Burlington rhTION: 1100 Hinesburg Rd. ON NAME: m4f;ivor House TIONAL TYPE: Dwelling R:Huntington & Jane Mavor ESS: 1100 Hinesburg Rd. CCESSIBILITY TO PUBLIC: URVEY NUMBER: 0414-10 (NEGATIVE FILE NUMBER: — -- 79-A-339 I TM REFERENCES: Zone/Easting/Northing 18/646636/4922174 .S.G.S. QUAD. MAP: 'RESENT FORMAL NAME: Mavor House iRIGINAL FORMAL NAMF: RESENT USE: Family Residence RIGINAL USE: Family Residence__ RCHITECT/ENGINEER: ILDER/CONTRACTOR: YSICAL CONDITION OF STRUCTURE: Excellent 0 Good � Fair❑ Poor ❑ Yes ❑ _No 0 Restricted ❑ STYLE: Greek Revival ZYE1, OF SIGNIFICANCE: DATE BUILT: Local El StateN National❑ c.1850 I1"RAI. DESCRIPTION: Structural System 1. Foundation: Stone® Brick ❑ Concrete ❑ Concrete Block ❑ 2. Wall Structure a. Wood Frame: Post & Beam N Balloon ❑ b. Load Bearing Masonry: Brick ❑ Stone ❑ Concrete ❑ Concrete Block ❑ c. Iron ❑ d. Steel ❑ e. Other: 3. Wall Covering: Clapboard ® Board .& Batten ❑ Wood. Shingle ❑ Shiplap ❑ Novelty ❑ Asbestos Shingle ❑ Sheet Metal❑ Aluminum ❑ P..sphalt Shingle ❑ Brick Veneer ❑ Stone Veneer[] w Bonding Pattern: Other: /. Roof Structure a. Truss: Wood® Iron ❑ Steel❑ Concrete ❑ b. Other: 5. Roof Covering: Slate 0 Wood Shingle ❑ Asphalt Shingle L7 Sheet Metal ❑ Built Up ❑ Rolled ❑ Tile ❑ Other: 6. Engineering Structure: 7. Other: Oendages: Porches ff Towers❑ Cupolas❑ Dormers[] Chimneys y 1Mdso Ells Wings ❑ Bay Window❑ Other: bot Style: Gable[] Hip❑ Shed❑ Flat ❑ Mansard❑ Gambrel I -_I ❑ JerkinheadSaw Tooth❑ With Monitor❑ With Bellcast( 1 Vith ParapetL] With False Front❑ Other: fiber of Stories:_ kwhwu of Bays: 3x3 Entrance Location: Front, left___ Mffox imate Dimensions: _ 30x35 "CAT '1'0STRUCTURE: Xo Threat■ Zoning[1 Roads1A C*veIol>ment[.1 Deterioration ❑ Alteration❑ Other: CAL ATTITUDES: Positive_.) Negatively Mixed I_I Other: a ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL OR STRUCI 1L DESCRIPTION: Temple ,nted L-plan with garage addition and sheds in rear. Entrance has 4/5-length sidelights, pilasters supporting entablature. Porch with square posts, shed roof, runs along inside of "L". 2/2 sash, molded cornice, modern exterior chimney. RELATED STRUCTURES: (Describe) Vs 1-6 - Variety of small, plan farm outbuildings. 7. Swimming pool. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: _ This small farmhouse features a simple temple front with Greek Revival sidehall entrance. The diminutive scale, vernacular style, and variety of small outbuildings provide the visual effect of a small, prosperous family farm, and thus serves to preserve South Burlington's disappearing agricultural heritage. REFERENCES: 1857, 1869 maps. MAP: (I dicate North oy i y-10 n Q 0 nC El 3 Is A nl z -r n Circle G� RROUNDING ENVIRONMENT: l Open Land N Woodland Scattered Buildings(] Moderately Built Up[] Densely Built Up❑ Residential® Commercial[] Agriculturalls Industrial[_ Roadside Strip DevelopmentL7 Other_: ORGANIZATION: Vt. Div. for Historic Preservation DATE RECORDFD: 6/20/79 a f • fil M 1100 HINESBURG ROAD This small frame house features a simple temple front with Greek Revival side hall entrance. The diminutive scale and vernacular style and variety of small out buildings provide the visual effect of a small farm prosperous family farm and thus serves to preserve South Buirlington's disappearing agricultrual heritage. 5 '{� b a, r�(/l .S �'Y".i C f� r c S Sir✓C �-j - l � � No Text L CAL � 11 1 e 4 L ,'Pntpaw- wow %- k" ki rILIj A 44 1360 C Ire s-/ 3 G 3/ 1/0?, /s i _. y, 3 3/, s— % a CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record L ���re, bQaf{"Q (A n b. Applicant r -cf unit -- c. Contact person i3&p h Q. 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). ODinn nn o Y e7i nX .I A 0 i ) A(� n m o YTf -Y ri 2. 4 (n /, i r .rto 9, 6-�4 1 „I - - - . 1 0_ 1 01 A i1n nn ? n 17 n h n n Q C)k,yLa- a& 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties VdA ph & MA 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Coranission which affect the proposed sub- division, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit five copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. S) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. (Signature) applicant or c ton hta c� t person date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: a) Owner of Record 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership 20 Kimball Avenue Suite 202 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 b) Applicant same c) Contact Person Bruce Wade, C.S. Architects Lance A. Llewellyn, FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington 3) PROPOSED USE(s) Commercial Offices 4) SIZE OF PROJECT: (i.e. Building Square Footage, $units, maximum height and # f- loor s 18,456 S.F. in two floors 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full and part time): 50 6) LOT COVERAGE: Building 9.3 %; Building, Parking, Outside Storage: 39 % 8) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings: $ 925,000.00 Landscaping $ 16,750.00 Other Site Improvements: (Please list with cost) $ 185,000.00 water, sewer, access road, parking, grading, retaining walls, etc. 9) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 1989 10) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY I RAFFIC (in and out) 452 VTE/day 11) PEAK HOUR(s) OF OPERATION: 4-5 p.m. weekdays 12) PEAK DAY (s) OF OPERATION: weekdays IG ATUr APPLICANT 7c� 7 �. LILMALD AJ.PA/fI.[C/ L .Vl v/,"S �nAo J f 1 _ _ 7w--�- / �� �/,7� Tom" - -- - -- - �y �ee•la'sa'[ �z. 5 .o. ./e•C / � �,/ •"","a �//^` •�a I-wr ems^' s N/F r-f I E a I' i �° e' e I � � R I ' t Loa r.l { /TseTe�aT[o At,. I J� , Zl / I I � II I W I ✓ I 2 I I 1 L___ _. Si• � I , f �Y I � � ti 7ror•.al<nn[a s«a�7o■CTYeT `o..A 4 I I 1 I 1 1 1 --�_ &a —awl �ea• all t I I I I 21 I I EGEND -- r..neTY �• ..T..c • P.eh..lD .o-41 a M1«•+..,T . .•i.Trwy v.T.a L�NI �/NYovNj �.r�v. � -_ •..I'aND .v.T.. NrI. /MYW..HT�vtiva -"�•—.�� •r.T�.Iy .N+•TKY N+ral %.0 N.el• ■ aT.a.. Nv.l ..•/ jsw Maio 4T r.ay . .c• .•� • 6 •.Trr.ry ro.•aa I•'x• . i-cu�.T•D rwTaasacToM c...c e.T• a•T �•+rw., •wu ® T.....wll- aP.T a�•vATro.I i 1 M 1 iT . aa.5 eLMt „aul� •t.M.iCM MA{ �� • � o i c~ i �No �y Ma W j a.. 1 a't I Pltv�rolE TY cr.. e GITODi r.l srP. •,�P�J oVTIaTI �e'T '�4fie. . � l I II NOTES 1. DWNER/APPLICANT, 1100 HINESBURG ROAD PARTNERSHIP 20 NIIIBALL AVENUE IT /S THE USERS RESPoNREV/SS/B/ INCLUDE THE LATESTL/TYIONS. TO ENSURE THESE DRAWINGS I ADD bItMH.I.[U¢A. Dr.MN41or.M. r.Jpip ¢lyyt: MMIJpTt veLl GLay. 4ILM NO. REVISIONS DATf SOUTH BURL ING N SITE SUITE 202 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 2. TOPOGRAPHY AND EXISTING FEATURES INFORMATION BY FITZPATRICK-LLENELLYN INCORPORATED (MARCH, 1989). 3. TOTAL PARCEL AREA, 2.43 ACRES 4. ZONED, INDUSTRIAL/AGRICULTURE (IAGI PERMITTED USE 16.404 5. PARKING, 18.456 S.F. COMMERCIAL OFFICE/250 S.F./SPACE . 74 SPACES REQUIRED 75 SPACES PROVIDED IINCLUDES 2 HANDICAPPED SPACE61 6. ALL CONNECTIONS TO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES FROM THE EXISTING HOUSE AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES MUST BE CAPPED. AT OR NEAR PROPEpTV LINE. FOLLOWING REMOVAL OF DWELLING. LOCATIONS OF CAPPED ENDS SHALL BE LOCATED BY CONTRACTOR FOR INCLUSION IN CERTIFICATION PLANS. 7. RETAININO WALL DESIGN BY OTHERS. B. FOR LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND EROSION CONTROL, SEE SHEET 5. 9. BUILDING SIZE, SWIPE, AND ORIENTATION AS DIRECTED BY OWNER/AGENT. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING BY OTHERS. SCALE : /° • 20' 76�5tD .DN/NESBURG ROADN SITE 61 UTILITIES PLAN— _____.- F'0T7FLU rR9(CC t o i80030 i I,II a� H --APR IL /999 - n INCORPORATED SLAP _lu.uc .Lui [Na1N[t WIN[ aND n.NN,Nc --ts D•?99l 11 WILLISTON VERMONT / I, 6 43 y Wi N - 4 - CS o/* a loi r . Oho/-o Gail ooi�,,b N li too •_� � .� � � �=r • '- _' _ _�_ '', � ^tea, t 'e-V o,.zs-• i 14 ALMeA✓477VE 3 t Aw • Ay ;�—o.y' .•fir.. ,, •� � �• \• .'ice. .,�. ...' ,. �w. IA. �. � `' � �'� . �2oQoS�D fkGGESS Dl Ve - oN POLLA OL Pr&OPe4 Lj z4' . �. 1000' ��. ��'� �•J � �,i t:,-. tom. v. 1't 4 4 ��1'f;' •• J, . ,•. F1�^ .. ... .t,` .1 N/. sc...lO�MJ n.wT.e•�Yu �.u. .✓•u� LEGEND GoW LOCUS NOTES .✓ / / I. lowa.no .w ulcil.c E.,aES // � � // •� c..o tiw '. rl,m.r.la�J �r.�l..mww.rcol�Nwa, „nl. w¢c .Fm.co \ �w¢c nwlaFo l,lnu¢c :.Rlolrr+so I I � � \ .. .0 w.cnius ro wr¢va ununcs r.a ,.e O � ccic, l.c InAc ro .ss¢urce nwc,ucs wc, c awce..r a rsr rvc.n ce F o s. xu,ra. .ou,iac a u..c / ; ca�rc,a sa l.nucla 1. ¢.,Irlarla ra.rc. i 1 r. Ic um wu oscia n orwa.� / I c Ta ...ocrxiw, Llow,i.a ... c.oslo. cw,ln. ccc T. .1�irpc<rwarc—l.c n ot.cls. /r is Tw usm FESIo1NS/Blurr To ENstow THESE DRAWINGS mcLum rNE urEsr NEv/sloNs. SCALE l: • 10• . I /j�l,4'-�79 'Z � MALCOLM WILLARD, mfo 9 699 NOB HILL WILLISTON, VT. 05495 9 (802) 879-1110 la / Listed For i/ Wet Locations f,0+ °MAjgr y PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS PATENT PENDING LPS Series LyteProo Universal Wall Mounter! Luminaire 35 watts to 100 watts High Pressure SOdium Metal Halide LPSC Series LytePro with Cut -Off Optics ❑ APPLICATIONS L Accont, security, area and porirnotor lighting injection molded, UV stabilized, impact forward incorporating nn internal front baffle to Can also be used in parking garages. tunnels, resistant polycarbonate in dark bronze finish yield IES Typo 11 boom pattern (wth forward underpasses, allays and dnvoways. that won't pool, chip or fade. Refractor/Ions is glare control). Spacing/mounting height ratio ❑ CONSTRUCTION constructed of injection molded high impact is 6:1 on all Type 11 units. Unique lamp/socket Modular design foaturos precision die cast acrylic. Reflector system is hydroforrncd assembly allows for minor field adjustment of aluminum mounting box. Mounting box anodized aluminum. Exterior hardware is boom pattern. (Additional light patterns contains four 112" NPS tapped holes for thru- stainless steel available-soo Accessories.) Refer to Section Wring and/or Installation of photoeontrol (see ❑ OPTICS 12 for photometric data. Accessories). Electrical and optical Exclusive bioptical lens allows for refractive ❑ BALLAST components are mounted to die cast distribution of light or glare free cut-off. Coro and coil ballast as noted In ordering aluminum tray for maximum hoot dissipation Refractor units (LPSR series) yields IES Typo Information. Refer to Section 12 for electrical and quick installation. Deep ribbing on back II boom pattern. Units are shipped with data. side of component tray permits airflow cooling prismatic refractor forward for uniform ❑ INSTALLATION assuring longer component lifo. Socket is perimeter lighting. Glare -free cutoff units Lightweight Mounting Box allows for time- pulse rated for 4KV. Cornponont cover is (LPSC series) are shipped with clear Ions saving installation via backfood, recessed box or thru-wiring Separate mounting box design isolates the supply wire from the component ORDERING INFORMATION tray allowing for the use of 90°C supply Wro as standard. Integral bubblo-lovol and slotted Catalog No.* Catalog No.* mounting holes helps assure a balanced with Refractor Cut -Off Optics Watts Lamp Volts Weight Ballast Installation. Elocirical/Optical tray (assembled HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM — and ready to wire) attaches to mounting box LPSR35NLXL(D LPSC35NLXLG) 35 E/B17 120 7 lbs. Reactor (NPF) via two captive 1/4" bolts (supplied) allowing ■LPSR50NLXL(D 0LPSC50NLXL(D 50 E/817 120 8 lbs. Reactor (NPF) both hands free for wiring. Component covoT LPSR70LXL LPSC70LXL 70 E/B17 120-277 10 lbs. HX-HPF snaps into place and two screws lock cover 0LPSR70NLXLm MLPSC70NLXLm 70 E/1317 120 9 lbs. Reactor (NPF) and optics together. LPSRi00NLXL(D LPSC100NLAL0) 100 E/1317 120 10 lbs. Roaclor (NPF) ❑ LAMP METAL HALIDE Supplied with clear medium base lamps. Refer LPSR50NMAL LPSC50NMAL 50 ED17 120 8 lbs. HX•NPF to Section 12 for lamp data. LPSRSOMAL LPSC50MAL 50 E017 120/277 10lbs. HX-HPF 0LPSA70MAL ■LPSC70MAL 70 ED17 120/277 101DS HX-HPF LPSR100MAL LPSC100MAL 100 E017 120/277 111DS HX-HPF * Medium base lamps Included with all units To order without lamo remove " L " from er%d ol Cat No (DT_ order HPF (High Power Factor Reactor) uallast, change "N" to "H" I.e., LPSF170"LXL OPTICAL. ACCESSORIES The following accessories are field installed and are designed to change the photometric performance of the LytePro Sodes to suit specific applications. Order by choosing the correct Catalog No, for the specific LytePro Series. LPS (Small) LYTECONTROL KIT III — Converts IES II to IES III ...............LPS3 LYTECONTROL KIT IV — Converts IES 11 to IES IV ....... . ....... LPS4 LYTECONTROL KIT II-2 side panels provide cut -oft on each side ..... LPS2 LYTECONTROL FRONT BAFFLE — Standard with cut-off units. Convons prismatic units to cut-off units ..........LPFB LPM (Medium) LPL (Large) LPM3 LPL3 LPM4 LPL4 OPTIONS —See page 18 LPM2 LPL2 GENERAL ACCESSORIES — See page 18 LPFB LPLFB ■Stock Item. Norinaliy caruud in factory stuck and/or at local regional warehouses STOCO 1FAI 17 Cutoff Floodligfit'CF See r � < , � ; I 7 1 / 1,,x5 J)J�,'� •Y `� . .�y�4 ,ak ? � �t t �'11' ' Ilt: 1 ?''M�t . x • �.. �' (lr'f !tit d it Cutoff Floodlight 2" AdjustaL - Fitter Housing Wattage/ Catalog f4ouming Code Size (sq.) Lamp Number (Insert Code at ' in Catalog I) 12' SOW MH MCF'4(J`,-0 3.2' Adjustable Fi(I.'n IF 70V7 tdH MCF'407-D 4 . Yc:e Mount 12' 100W MH MCF1410-0 5 >: F.ed 20' Mount 12' 17SW UH MCF'417-M 6. 1rZ- Ad;uslable Filter 16 17W.' Ll! ( CF1417-M (IQ' ;.dl F,Ccl tot us.., on 12' housing only) 16' 250 'Mll CF'425-M 8 :'..;a0ut t:hnndinq O ud::afC) 17 40JV.1MH CF'440-tA ,;•t,.,.,!:alnln °2' I(t &A'/ i4H CF'490-M 12' 35V/ IIf's MCF'503.1 12' 50111 HPS MCF'S05-D 12' 70WI(PS IdCF7501-M 12' 100711IPS MCF'510.14 12' 150V7 HI'S 6tCF'515.M IG' 250W HPS CF'..VS-M IG' 400:YIIPS CF*.IAO M 22' 1GXAY1il'S CF'Y M Options: (factory -installed) Cuange Add Alter Description Sbllix To Suffix 120V Reactor luaast (50-1W HPS 12' housitta oluy) I 480V ballast (175-1000W I'Ali E 70-1003t'7 HPS one;) 5 Quad-voll ballast (50-10MY MH only) 14 Iri -volt ballast II'. :;nautx m w,:vlc Single Fuse' I120V. 277V or 347V) 1.2 u fi F Dual Fusc' (2u 24UV or 4WV) 3 c a 5 F 2-Lem 1(250-4G(W I iPS only) (Pages 50-51) v L'4e Sulfur H Duad1 Sland:ly I-ncludis 10016 0 Linq)) Mort delay-i..:Li; Iy;M7) 0 Uplight Billion 112' 1. 16' Ivrr..uKl% WAy. sl.%,41 l}Fx h7•erl,; N•i L9m 1}1ll U Button Pholocell' Factory -installed with all mountings otto than 2- AdiLs.L.ak, Filter (exc'ept:1OOoW v:112OV, all48M vor W.. Slmix P External l'IWlocell' (!actory-utstalled)(I'age 80) For lixlures w7100OW.120V 1 P rot lixtutes v:/48UV 5 P Button Pholuccu' Catalog I Field -installed in fixtures with 2' Adiuslabtc Fitter For fixtioes w/120V (except IOOOW) PC-1 For lixtutes wr208.240 or 271V - PC-2 For fixtures wr34IV NOTE: Fixtures v ill tacicry-installed pholocell and/a «re se4tpllod with single voltage Ialtast. I This cutoff luminaire has an optical system specilicatly desion(A to asslui: mazdltum LIGHTING main bearli plulrtciu)n. WhilO } gcivzily p spill it (I II is ;I grnr.Cllly pn;lhnn' (; mill ;I � • If) 1!:iJ till f hilt imillal 10 f(:(Al0: gC1R. ;,,dt 0041111 Ophntun: pr:rirnn:<;t.r,O Canrl6ry)0::ef U s,n!;u::on Curve of Candlepower Distribution Curve of •100VI HPS Culnit Floc ohq rl. 20 fill 1000W HPS Cutoff Floodlight. 20' 611 .thn:c 11uniunt.11 above horizontal. :•if :n r�, rut ,fIn - IfMY tIn of 4oxr n• 2n• An w Rey ,00 Syr. �jKl 1 1 Isoloolcandte plot of one 40OW HPS Isofootcandle plot of one 1000W HPS Cutoff Floodlight at 30' mounting Cutoff Floodlight at 40' mounting height, and 20' lilt above horizontal. height, and 20' tilt above horizontal. The main beam is 50' above a line perpendicular to the face of the fixture. Accessories: (lield-installed) (Page 80) 12"housing 16"housing 22"housing WkieGuaid FIVG-12 FWG-16 not available R.xklighl Shield SBL-12 SOL-16 SBL-22 Potycalbonate Vandal Shield LS-12 LS-16 LS-22 -Specification Sheets: MCF3.12% MCF4.127. MCF5.12%MCF6-12', CF3.1G. CF4.16' CF5.1G' CF3.22' CF4.22' CF5.22' 2-level Option (250-40OW HPS)............................ Pages 50-51 Optical Systems ......................................... Pages 56-57 Mountings ....... ........ .. ...........................Page 58 Catalog Number LogicNollage Suffix Rey ........................ Page 59 blounling Alternatives.::....:.......:.:.......:...............Page 81 Accessories ................................................ . Pape 80 Mounting Brackets. ............................ Pages 82-83 Pales . . ........... .... ........ .Pages 8447 Per ►""'v►r RML Series �N4ENi.�� Roadway Luminaire 150 watts to 400 watts High Pressure Sodium Metal Halide PRODUCT SPECIFICATtOAS O APPLICATIONS Roadway, parking lot lighting. Any outdoor application where tight light control to preveril glare and light trespass is desired. O CONSTRUCTION Seamless one-piece die-cast aluminum housing eliminates the threat of leaking. Finished in Duraplex 110 bronze polyester powder for superior resistance against the elements. One-piece die-cast aluminum Ions frame with integral hinges held fastened with ORDERING INFORMATION captive stainless steel hardware. Heat and shock resistant tempered glass is sealed to frame via liquid silicone. Lens frame assembly is sealed to housing via neoprene rubber gasket. Doluxo poreotain sockot pulse rated for 4KV. Aluminum arm featuring ample splice chamber allows use of 60°C wire, (150°C wire must be used when splices are made internally in the fixture). Arens are factory installed on the fixture to speed field installation to square or round 4" poles. Catalog No.© Watts Lamp Base IES Class® Ballast Weight HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM j b1L3150LX 150 E18. Clear Mogul Typo III HPF-CWA 34 lbs. ■ RML3250LX 250 E18. Clear Mogul Type III HPF-CWA 38 lbs. N RML3400LX 400 E18, Clear Mogul Type III HPF-CWA 42 lbs. HALIDE _METAL RML3175MA 175 028, Clear Mogul Type III HPF-CWA 32 lbs. ■RML3250MA 250 1328, Clear Mogul Type III HPF-CWA 34 lbs. N RIAL3400MA 400 637, Clear MWul Type III HPF-CWA 36 lbs. ORotaling cast mounting plate field converts unit trun round to square or square to round pole mounting. VOLTAGE —Specify voltage: 120V, 208V, 240V, 277V or 480V. For multi -tap (120V. 208V, 240V and 277V) order "MTB'•. mMODIFIED TYPE IV: For Moddled Type IV forward throw charge "T' In Cat. No. to "4", I.o.—RML4150LX. mMODWIED TYPE II: For Modified Typo II distnbutan change "3" in Cal. No. to "2'•, I.e.—RML2150LX. OPTIONS ACCESSORIES To add factory options The following arc fio!d installed add appropriate suffix to Cat. No. accessories. Order by Cat. No. Suffix Cat. No. FUSING: Fusing protects HID circuitry In pole mounted installations. It is suggested That fuses are mounted within pole base for accessibility and case of maintenance. For 120V and 277V Single fusing ......FS For 208V, 240V and 480V Double fusing ......................FFS PHOTOCONTROL: Factory -installed plug -in -twist -to -lock dusk -to -dawn control (P400 Series) meets EEI-NEMA standards. Temperature range minus 50°F to plus 150°F. Built-in time delay eliminates off -and -on cycling due to momentary light flashes. Control matches specified fixture voltage rating ......... TLR/PC PHOTOCONTROL: (Button -Typo) factory installed in housing back ......PCB GLARE SHIELD: Architectural bronze painted aluminum sections may be field installed in patterns of two (at any corner) three side or four side configurations. Four side assemblies provide 150 cut-off, 4 piece assembly ...................RLS50 LEXAN VISOR: Clear vandal -proof potycarbonate shield protects against rucks, air -gun pellets, or other missiles. To mount Glare Shield and Lexan visor on the same fixture, consult factory ....AL552 CAST ALUMINUM MOUNTING PLATE: Finished in Durapiox II" bronze polyester powder. Cast -In tomplate mounts arm to any size recess box .................RL10 O OPTICS One-piece hydroformed Alzake reflector for consistant and efficient photometric t. R•.. performance. Reflector system is precisely designed for IES Type III c-n-off. Excellon! control places only 14% of the light on house - side to minimize trespass and 43% on street - side for superior efficiency. Refer to Section 12 for photometric data. O BALLAST High power factor CWA ballast. Refer to Section 12 for electrical data. O INSTALLATION Mounting arm is equipped wrth cast mounting plate. Plate Is flat on one side for mounting to square poles and curved on the other side for mounting on 4" round poles. Arm features„ splice chamber. Accessories available for surface mounting. O LAMP Clear mogul base lamps as specified. (Not supplied.) Refer to Section 12 for lamp data. ` Template Jt g,. ®T 3„ 141„ ® t, J- 8i _1 . T �— 18"-._1 �..-14"-+I EPA-1.30 sq. ft. TENON MOUNT: (2%" OD) One Arm ..........................RMA10 Two Arms at 900 ...................RMA25 Two Arms at 1800 .................RMA20 Three Arms at 901 ..................RMA35 :., Four Arms at 900 ........ ..........RMA40 ■Stock Item: Normally carried in factory stock and/or at local regional warehouses. /'�$ tb1,�� r 37 STIOVIY® /4y7; FORM NR_l COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" }� FOR TAX CREDITS: O/ (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR _ VEHICLE TRIP ENDS `.l vph (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax j assessment) units (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER CONSTRUCTION s.f. (5) TYPE OF USE (6) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: ( 7 ) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) $ FORM NR-2 COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES (1) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END $ 226.00 / vte (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS form �` (From NR-1) vte (3) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) $ (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 G'� (from line (3) of Form NR-1) units (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-9) $ / unit (6) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND �JC� (4) x (5) $ (7) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-10) $ �U� / unit (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND CS % (4) x (7) $ (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND f (From Table ST-11) $ unit (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (4) x (9) $ 14� (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-12) $ / unit (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS � (4) x (11) $ (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From line (8) on Form NR-3) (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-13) qryl, (" units $ ' O y / unit FORM NR-2 (continued) (15) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (13) X (14) (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ d (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (13) x (16) (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-15) $ (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (13) x (18) (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $ (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) / unit $ q l�L / unit $ 6C / unit (22) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (8) - (10) - (12) - �� (15) - (17) - (19) - (21) $ FORM NR-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-17) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) (6) LAND VALUE (From current tax records) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST —CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) / $1,000 I., 6 t uni is CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1 ) Name of Applicant f 17,4eOl-m 2 ) Name of Subdivision 11490 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plot designer since preliminary plat application 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: JOI-OL 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and cpntaining all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. r �f (Signature) applicant or contact person bate .� � =�- .z -: � �� � ����? 6 5�- 4S- C a CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1) Name of Applicant%�G4Lru 2) Name of Subdivision/ C1G� fN�S/3�Cle� ���i) top 3) Submit Subdivision Fee />1 4) Describe Subdivision (,i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, gross floor area for commercial or industrial uses) : 5) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone numbers of owner of record, applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: G�JtGLT-s �sy, l/% 6) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer b . Surveyor �-� T 7�'/� T/uG� L lc t,UEL1 Y/L� /iu r d< /iu� t1vl� C. d. Plat Designer �LPryF i7t"S-r�N £ oya KidE� �� .LNG,• 7) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since sketch plan application: 1 8) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all contiguous properties: 1 �/�/L� /�/�---T IV' T "� >'2. /G � `ice-�'�,s��c �t� 1�� S, Y'c�e-�.r� � ny%✓ �/;5-�Jo3 sa- Clv Dwiy fox 9) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer(s) of the preliminary map(s) accompanying this application:T� 10) COST ESTIMATES for Planned Unit Developments, multi -family and commercial and industrial complexes: a) Buildings �qS Boca b) Landscaping c) All other site improvements (e.g., curb work �Ig5-00 o 11) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC for Planned Unit Developments, multi- family projects, and commercial and industrial complexes (2-way traffic, in plus out): A.M. Peak hour 2 ! P.M. Average daily traffic peak hour '73 % of trucks 12) Attach FIVE copies and ONE reduced copy (11 x 17) of preliminary map showing the following information: a) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the City., b) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. c) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. 2 d) The names of all subdivisions immediately adjacent and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. e) The location and size of any existing sewers and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdi- vided. f) Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks and other public or privately main- tained open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. g) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of proposed finished grades where change of exist- ing ground elevation will be five feet or more. h) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. i) Numerical and graphic scale, date and truce north arrow. j) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative means of providing water supply to the proposed subdivision. k) Details of proposed connection with the existing sani- tary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 1) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed, location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface soil, rock and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results of percolation tests. m) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. n) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culvert which may be required. o) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic layout in the field. Unless on existing street intersection is -shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. p) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 3 13) Development timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates) : /" 4 l6 f - 5/'2-� �L`� X,- E- c- 14) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: 15) 1) All existing subdivision, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the records owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street adjoining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or pro- posed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the -remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the subdivider's entire holding. -; 4 N/F -- - - BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LTD PARTNERSHIP .o 273/265 N/F RICHARD & ANN PAINTER, LINUS & SUE WILES i� _ 141/83 H. rRIY JB6.0 �EcuI�TNAME EXISTS OF AN NC SOUTH I 1 RIM 4055 INV J99.5 I 1 I ------ ---- ---- _-- 3 .5 1 I I 33809.0 --- ------- -------_ d110EN5 I I I PROTECw AILA M[ A 1 �' �`{K•�' { TENT 1'EROSION CONTROL BAflRIEEqq �' I {7 P`l j _ fl/I 1 I HYE 1. IIIEOMTELY AFTER INSTIALA/� _. 01, A. } 38 .34Z I I I v _ 1 B' TO CL SE$7 POINT �{�; OF 8 L N0, B.F.E. F E $ ..r�5�ppAHDI 0921 II O ' NTED E CNIA 1 T BE REWVED ID II I I � m I Mal W 1 1 REfNNINO WAIL QF.41GN, Or OTHER CONCRETE REIN NG I P=i t WAIL ttP ( I J '-0- SIDEWALK I ; ) 1 20.-0" ) i &KE RACK I 1 PROPOSED ILN LppCC rION 99[� I DFTNL SREET 5 I 1 i PROVIDE RNLNd ALONG ' TOP Df fl INNING 1WA11, i ANONSS v10GE I ' TER CS a� TO (AND E I I , - - % I B• 12- TAPPING I SLEEVE k VALVE ' I tit 1 _ " _._______-1"--- � � � 1 _J --- N ♦ 7.1 I I ' I I I 1 � LEGEND --------�� PERIMETER PROPERTY ONE RIGHT OF WAY OR EASMCNT UK - sFTBACX ENT: EB EXISTING CDNIOLW LINE PROPOSED I-IOIR LINE - - -' - - - - EXISTING EDGE OF PAYENENT _ PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXIST. WATER ONE W/ -1 t VIEVE __-- PROPGSEO WATER ONE W/ HYDRANT tr VALVE - -- - - - - _ EXISTING SVRIARY SEWER w/ WNHOIE PROPOSE' sAMTARY SEWER Y1/ MANHOLE - - - - - - - - - - - E.WiNG sTORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER W/ CATCH BASIN --- -ti4- - EXIS11N0 FDRCE WIN 9 EXISTING POWER POLE ❑ CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND CALCULATED WTERSECWNI / FOUND FENCE CORNER CONCRETE REA.- WALL EXISTING FENCE ONE KW TOP OF WALL - SPOT ELEVATION N/F MOW OR FORMERLY W. Jai I , ___T_ " - - - - - - ------- ----s------------ 307.5 354.5 DRNNAGE SWALE .... ��•� I 1 I NV. 3BA.0 RIP RAP AT OUTLET 1100 HINESBURG ROAD PART ERSH� 274/36Z fD ISLAND ROW (A 1Y •1. wg u � 11 APPLE TA N/F GREEN ACRES INC. V BOUNDRY Of �tONCRETE IRETALNW VIDE CNDRAIL NANO s T I' 47' E L.M ED BO HINESBURG 'WALL B1 9THERS. ( .) TOP AF RETAINING WALL tow. PROVIDE TYPE B EROSION CONTROL BARRIER ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH OF SOUTH PROPERTY LINE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION „ FYICTIIJf1_ TLJGCC M TYPE SIZE TREATMENT Y TYPE SIZE TREATMENT 1. BALSAM FIR 12" CAL REMOVE 13. LARCH IS" CAL REMAINS 2. GOLDEN WEEPING WILLOW 24' CAL REMAINS 14. APPLE 10' CAL REMOVE 3. BALSAM FIR 6' CAL REMOVE 15. APPLE 12" CAL REMOVE 4. BALSAM FIR 6- CAL REMOVE 16. CHERRY B" CAL REMAINS S. BOX ELDER 10' CAL REMOVE 17. APPLE 3' CAL RELOCATE 6. BALSAM FIR 6' CAL REMOVE 18. APPLE 3' CAL RELOCATE 7. SCOTCH PINE 12' CAL REMAINS 19. APPLE 3' CAL RELOCATE 8. APPLE 8' CAL RELOCATE 20. APPLE 3" CAL RELOCATE 9. APPLE 6- CAL RELOCATE 21. APPLE 3" CAL RELOCATE 10. APPLE 6' CAL RELOCATE 22. SPRUCE (25 TREES MPRO%) RELOCATE 11. APPLE 4' CAL RELOCATE 23. CHERRY 6" CAL REMAINS 12. BALSAM FIR 12' CAL REMOVE SITE PLAN - - - - - - J TO SOUTH BURUNCION MUMICIPAL PUMP STATION SOUTH BURLING SITE W \\ g I ' N 1 LOCUS 1 1 QJ 1 NOTES -0. N N/F I. APPI ICANI MALCOLM WRIAND (IC.) JI,/II j GREEN ACRES INC. 699 NOB Hitt 91/26 WILLISTON. VT 05495 (VV 2. TOPOGRAPHY AND EXISTING FEAIURI S INI OHMAIION UY �sn"{ *wf �rwnn FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATFO.(MARCH 19H9) roe m� . nJ•,�wrsr }, TOTAL PARCEL AREA:. 2.43 ACRES 4. ZONED7 INDUSTRIAL/AGRICULTURE. (LAG). y 1 PERMITTED USE 16.404 •+4; 5. PARKING: 18.456 S.F. COMMEHCLAI. Of f ICL /2SU S.1 ./SPACI 74 SPACES REQUIRED t-I 1 75 SPACES PROVIDED (INC LUDI S 2 IIANUICA111U EES i„ & 1 VAN SPACE) 1 BIKE RACK '\ \ 6. ALL CONNECTIONS TO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES FROM 110 TWIN E%ISTING HOUSE AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES MUST HI CAPPED. AT OR NEAR PROPERTY LINE, FOLLOWING RI MOVAt 01 OWEI LING. LOCATIONS OF CAPPED ENDS SHAI I fit 1 OCAII H H) LN"A✓1T CONTRACTOR FOR INCLUSION IN CIRIIIICAIION PIAW. s 7. RETAINING WALL DESIGN BY OTHERS. B. FOR LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND EROSION CONIROI, SIL SHEET 5. 9. BUILDING SIZE. SHAPE. AND ORIENTATION AS DIHI.CIID BY OWNER/AGENT. SEE ARCHITECTURAI DRAWING HY OIHIHSi 10, TREES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE EXISTING IMES TO HE REMOVED, RETAINED OR RELOCATED. FOR PROPOSED PLANTINGS, PLEASE SEE PAGE FIVI, LANDSCAPI AND LIGHTING PLAN. SCALE: 1' - 20• GRAPHIC SCALE #� ( IN FT) I IGGA - 20 IL RECEIVcC AL 13 1999 City of So. Burlington If I , 404 _.. S - N/F 483 0 13URLINGTON PROPERTIES LTD I I 402 N/F _ 273/265 _ bl ' H RD ANN PAINTER & IC R141/83 - 'bJ�5 `(* EVIDENCE EXISTS OF AN El - HIM i ' SANRARY SEWER EXTENDING SOUTH 3106 _ OF TMANHOLE NO FURTHER RIM 393.Z-- _ _ - -MH. 5IC MTBEEN PERFORMED THISOFFICE �- rr S___-- L - -- - - -- -- --------------- S--`--_-- T7_ _-_-___ UPTH - NICIK PUMP STATION IT RIM 405.5 NpV. 399. 1' / � 1 I 1 bs I I I 1) N/F I 1 I ARTHUR & I LEXIE RYE 1 11 II I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 � I .III 0 II � CD II I LEJ I II Z II I 1 I PRRCOPOSEDS[SIGN 1 I I I DEI,i L�SNEEi 5 ( , I / 1 SLEEVE"/ I ='NC 7 I -FEET A,". NblNulgN,ll\ 8' TO C EST POINT Of BOIL NC � 1 a AREYO'JED CTU S 1 I , I 1 WS' OTHER I I ' RCTNMNO WALL 1. I 3'-0' SMDEWAL 1 20'-0. PROVIDE RNLINy ALONG. ALL TOP OF Rp[5I5NNSq 1 I ME �. OET11 . I PVMT.� I l_y__-_--_-____ 1 I I I I � I LEGEND PERYETER�PROPERTY LINE - � ROM OF 011 EASMENT LIME SFi9AC1l 41 LINE EXISTING CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED COIROUR LINE - - - - - - - EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT EwSIWG WATER LINE W/ NYpINA ! VALYE --W-WXr PROPOSED WATER UNE W/ KRIRANT ! -W Ex6RNG SAINTARf sE'NER W/ wMgLE t-S PROPOSED SAwTAM SERER W/ -ROLE ----------- EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER W/ cA'_ BASIII - �N-- - EXISTING FORCE LAN 9 EXISTING -ER POLE O CONCRETE MONUWNT FOUND C CNCULATED INTERSECTION /-FOIRIO FENCE CONNLN CONCRETE RETAINING MALL I I`... II M:I 1.1 IH I. OF WAIL - SPOT ELEVARON N/F NOW OR 1401-1 ����pppppp 9RE ®W ! Or�IG. WIG !O <tF NAME FYICTIAIr TRFFC 387.5 384.5 4'-0- 1 '-0' 6' '-0' 24T 77 TYP. TYP• HANDICAPPED - +.• .rQ ACCESS RAMP i0 ? PROVIDE RAILING ALONG TOP SEE OF RETAINING SEE WALL :� B.F.E. 91 5 ,7^�:•.; NICK DfTNIs �p LSIM10 S b : CONCRWETE WALL N ENNE RACK L tires f^ t1 �• iER ES 1 - �: ( F LAND _ 1 - PROVDE GUARD" ALONG �S 11 iV 41' E •7' lOP AKK RETAINING WALL SITE PLAN SCALE 1' - 20' / TYPE SIZE TREATMENT r TYPE SIZE TREATMENT 1. BALSAM FIR 12' CAL REMOVE 13. LARCH 15' CAL REMAINS 2. GOLDEN WEEPING WILLOW 24' CAL REMAINS 14. APPLE 10' CAL REMOVE 3. BALSAM FIR 6' CAL REMOVE IS- APPLE 12' CAL REMOVE 4. BALSAM FIR 6' CAL REMOVE 15. CHERRY 8' CAL REMAINS 5. BOX ELDER 10' CAL REMOVE 17. APPLE 3' CAL RELOCATE 6. BALSAM FIR 6' CAL REMOVE 18, APPLE 3' CAL RELOCATE 7. SCOTCH PINE 12' CAL I REMAINS 19. APPLE 3' CAL RELOCATE B. APPLE 8' CAL RELOCATE 20, APPLE 3' CAL RELOCATE 9. APPLE 6. CAL RELOCATE 21. APPLE 3' CAL RELOCATE 10. APPLE 6' CAL RELOCATE 22. SPRUCE (25 TREES APPROX) RELOCATE 11. APPLE 4' CAL RELOCATE 23. 1 CHERRY 6' CAL REMAINS 12. BALSAM FIR 12' CAL REMOVE N/F MALCOLM WILLARD i 274/362 2.43 ACRES Af PROPOSED 30'-0' ROW (APPROX. LOC.) APPLE 1NE y �y ------N/F PROVIDE TYPE 8 EROSION SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE CONTROL BARRIER ALONG 91/26 ENTIRE LENGTH OF SOUTH PROPERTY LINE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. APPLICANT/OWNER: MALCOLM WILLARD 699 NOB HILL WILLISTON, VT 05495 2. TOPOGRAPHY AND EXISTING FEATURES INFORMATION BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED (MARCH 1989). 3. TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 2.43 ACRES 4. ZONED: INDUSTRIAL/AGRICULTURE (IAG). PERMITTED USE 16.404 5. PARKING: 18,456 5.F. COMMERCIAL OFFICE/250 S.F./SPACE = 74 SPACES REQUIRED 75 SPACES PROVIDED (INCLUDES 2 HANDICAPPED & 1 VAN SPACE) 1 BIKE RACK 6. ALL CONNECTIONS TO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES FROM THE EXISTING HOUSE AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES MUST BE CAPPED, AT OR NEAR PROPERTY LINE, FOLLOWING REMOVAL OF DWELLING. LOCATIONS OF CAPPED ENDS SHALL BE LOCATED BY CONTRACTOR FOR INCLUSION IN CERTIFICATION PLANS. 7. RETAINNG WALL DESIGN BY OTHERS. 8. FOR LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND EROSION CONTROL, SEE SHEET 5. 9. BUILDING SIZE, SHAPE, AND ORIENTATION AS DIRECTED BY OWNER/AGENT. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING BY OTHERS. 10. 1REES SHOWN ON IHIS PLAN ARE EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED. RETAINED OR RELOCATED. FOR PROPOSED PLANTINGS, PLEASE SEE PAGE FIVE, LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING PLAN. 1 1� W L' 3 APPLE TREES N/F �I<IN SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE CJ 91/26 -EVERGREENS RELOCATED LNORTH SIDE PROPERTY (� APPLE TREES RELnTED J�( FROM NORTHWEST CORNER C� N. OF PROPERTY - - - - - - - - - - - RECEhic"D �i 'i ALPINE DESIGN BL ENGINEERING IVCORPORATED 147 A13JN YI001L W. W■LfR7N, VwYMONT Ipa}an-7ao9. Q AUG 1 7 1999 City of So. Burlington GRAPHIC SCALE DRAWN 6T: ACR - - -- CK'D BY: CPL - - SCALE: AS NO ( IN IY:ET ) I IRON - 20 It ISSUE DATE: 9/1 2 JOB NO.: 99016 INFFF NOTINFORMATION IF IS MISSING OR UNCLEAR, CGS-ONTACT ENGINEER OR ARCH01 �_4 ECTnFOOROCLARIF�ICATION. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 8, 1999 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Planned Uniat Development, 1100 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed is a copy of the August 3, 1999 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sin'erely, �r Joe eith, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 30, 1999 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT. 05495 Re: Office Building, 1100 Hinesburg Rd. Dear Mr. Willard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 3, 1999 at 7:30 p.m. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Resp 11 yours, Ra m' r�i . B"elair Administrative Officer 1 State of Vermont �r Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation October 16, 1997 Burlington Properties Limited Partnership P.O. Box 3180 Farmington Hills MI 48018 AGENCY OF NATURAL. RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-5656 Subject: WW-4-0141 -- Install sewage force main into Lot #4 (4C0473-5) from Rt. 116 for future development. located on off Route 116 in South Burlington, Vermont Dear Applicant: In reviewing our records, we field that we have not approved the above referenced project as being in compliance with the Environmental Protection Rules. We received your application on June 19, 1989, and after reviewing the application we found that there was incomplete or missing information. We sent you a letter requesting additional information. As of this date, we have not received the information we requested. If we do not hear from you within two (2) weeks of the date of this letter we will assume that you no longer wish to proceed with this application, and the project will be denied. If you wish to pursue the project in the future, you will need to submit a new application, fee and complete engineering plans. The project will need to meet the minimum requirements of the regulations in effect at the time the application is submitted. Sincerely, ft ssanne Wyman Assistant Regional Engineer City of South Burlington Planning Commission Richard Trudell Act 250 - Lou Borie i State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist September 2, 1997 Burlington Properties Limited Partnership P.O. Box 3180 Farmington Hills MI 48018 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-5656 Subject: WW-4-0141 -- Install sewage force main into Lot 44 (4C0473-5) from Rt. 116 for future development. located on off Route 116 in South Burlington, Vermont Dear Applicant: In reviewing our records, we find that we have not approved the above referenced project as being in compliance with the Environmental Protection Rules. We received your application on June 19, 1989, and after reviewing the application we found that there was incomplete or missing information. We sent you a letter requesting additional information. As of this date, we have not received the information we requested. If we do not hear from you within two (2) weeks of the date of this letter we will assume that you no longer wish to proceed with this application, and the project will be denied. If you wish to pursue the project in the future, you will need to submit a new application, fee and complete engineering plans. The project will need to meet the minimum requirements of the regulations in effect at the time the application is submitted. Our last correspondence was a review letter dated July 26, 1989. We have enclosed a copy for your reference. Sincerely, kT"rYLU"PA4^-- Uessanne Wyman Assistant Regional Engineer City of South Burlington Planning Commission Richard Trudell Lou Borie-Act 250 (4C0473-5A) I y_w State of Vermont pew *'�t' Y WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. WW-4-0129 Environmental Protection Rules APPLICANT 1100 Hinesburg Road Chapter 4, Public Buildings ADDRESS Partnership 20 Kimball Ave. Suite 202 So. Burlington; VT 05403 This project, consisting of removing an existing single family dwelling and constructing an 18,456 square foot office building for a maximum of 50 employees located off Vermont Route 116 in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL 1. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project Number 89030, Sheet 1 of 5 "Site & Utilities Plan" dated April 1989, last revised 5/17/89 prepared by Fitzpatrick & Llewellyn. Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. 2. In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project. the transferee shall become permittee and be subiect to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. 3. The Protection Division now reviews the sewage and -rater systems for public buildings under 10 V.S_A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. Paqe 2 WW-4-0129 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership PLATER 4. The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Department of Health's "Letter of Approval" Project #1288/WSID #5091 dated June 1, 1990 to Larry Copp. SEWAGE 5. The project is approved for connection to the So. Burlington Airport Parkway wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 750 gallons of sewage per day. Dated at Essex Jct.. Vermont this 24th day of 14arch 1992. Elizabeth A. McLain. Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation B y awevel- a&5' � Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer cc. Donald Robisky City of So. Burlington Planning Commission Plater Supply Division Department of Health Department of Labor & Industry Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn. Inc.