Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1060 1070 1080 Hinesburg Roadray From: ray Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 12:51 PM To: 'geltabbakh@lcgo.com' Subject: RE: Zoning permit for Cupcake Daycare at the Sphinx building Dr. Eltabbakh, Please be advised that your request for a three (3) month extension to the expiration date of site plan approval #SP-17- 24 issued on 5/1/17 is hereby granted. You now have until February 1, 2018 to obtain a zoning permit for the daycare use. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburi.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. -----Original Message ----- From: Dr. Gamal Eltabbakh [mailto:geltabbakh@lcgo.com] Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 11:42 AM To: ray <ray@sburl.com> Subject: Zoning permit for Cupcake Daycare at the Sphinx building Mr. Belair, I request a three months extension on the approval of the zoning permit for Cupcake Daycare at the Sphinx building on 1060 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont. The original permit will expire on 10/31/2017. Thank you. Gamal Eltabbakh Owner Sphinx building 'jM7o soul 1b, PLANNING & ZONING Planning and Zoning Invoice Non -Residential Impact & Permit Fees r/ Property Owners Name: /(/ �iv mllll$OVIN Property Location: "imz(�� Amount: Payment Type: Date: Code Pricing Amount Due Zoning Permit (Non-residential) ZP- zp $1-3.00 plus sq. ft. building Qa $0.35 per sq. ft. $ plus After -the -fact of (_) 500/0 [no NOV] or (_) l00% [NOV] $ J Zoning Permit Total $ Sewer Allocation Fee WWA- #zoo g.p.d x $11.52 $ (_) Bartlett Bay (_) Airport Parkway Road Impact Fee #221 $ Fire Impact Fee #203 $ Police Impact Fee #222 $ Dorset Street Waterline Fee #230 $ --------- Sewer Connect Inspection WW- ww $63 $ Total $ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Z O N I N G P E R M I T A P P L I C A T I O N Applicant: Gamal H. Eltabbakh Application No: 1060 Hinesburg Rd, Suite 301, So. Burlington VT 05403 [office use only] Applicant Mailing Address: g g Applicant Email: geltabbakh@lcgo.com Daytime phone: 802-859-9500 Property Street Address: 1060 Hinesburg Rd VT 05403 Property Owner: Gamal H. Eltabbakh Parcel Size: Property Owner Mailing Address: 1060 Hinesburg Rd, Suite 301, So. Burling Tax Parcel ID No. 0860-01 C 1. PROPOSED project including building dimensions (describe): To amend a previously approved plan for a 40,261 sf bldg consisting of eq parts general office and medical office. Amendment consists of 1) converting 2,500 sf of general office to a 40 student child care facility, non-residential use. Installation of a 1500 sf outdoor play area is part of proposed improvements. 2. Present USE(S) of the property: ❑ Single family home on its own parcel ❑✓ Other (please state the USE per Land Development Regulations- retail, general office, multifamily residential, etc.): 40,261 sf commercial property divided equally between medical and general office use. 3. List all present structure(s) on property (describe including dimensions or square footage of each): One 3-story structure. Total: 40,261 sf. Footprint: 13,478 sf. 4. Does the project include a proposed change of USE? ❑No (the property will still be used for the same purpose) F✓ Yes (please state proposed changed or added USES per Land Development Regulations- retail, general office, multifamily residential, etc.): Conversion of 2,500 sf general office use to child care facility. 5. ESTIMATED total cost of improvements (materials and labor): $ 275K 6. Building footprint — i.e. size in sq.ft of main floor of house and all attached and detached structures including enclosed breezeways, garages, and sheds (describe): Existing: 40,261 sf Proposed: no change 7. Total square feet of other impervious surfaces on site (i.e. driveways, patios, decks) Existing: Proposed: +1500sf(playground) 8. ATTACH SKETCH PLAN OR SITE PLAN (not required if project consists ONLY of interior renovations or replacement of existing roof, siding, etc. in the exact same size) 9. APPLICANT/OWNER CERTIFICATION The undersigned property owner hereby consents to submit this application and understands that if the application is approved, the Zoning Permit and any attached conditions will be binding on the property. Property Owner Signature PRINT NAME Date The undersigned applicant hereby affirms that the information presented in this application is true, accurate and complete. Applicant Signature PRINT NAME Date OFFICE USE ONLY — ADMINISTRATIVEOFFICER ACTION —' OFFICE USE ONLY DATE Received: FEE Received: $ Identification of zoning district: Identification of proposed use: PROPOSED USE TYPE: PermittedConditional Date of SITE PLAN approval/denial Approval Date Denial Date Date of SUBDIVISION approval/ denial Approval Date Denial Date Date of CONDITIONAL USE approval/ denial Approval Date Denial Date' Date of appeal VARIANCE approval/ denial Approval Date Denial Date Date of MISCELLANEOUS approval/ denial Approval Date Denial Date Provided applicant copy of URBEC or VCBE Standards Handbook or❑Not Applicable FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ACTION ZON ING PERMIT APPROVED Approval Date'; Administrative Officer's Signature Permit EFFECTIVE date Permit EXPIRATION date DENIED REASON for DENIAL Denial Date Notice of Appeal Rights: Any interested person may appeal this decision by filing a written Notice of Appeal with the clerk of the Development Review Board within fifteen [15] days of the date of this decision. The notice of appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of $223.00. This permit does NOT authorize commencement of any development activity approved by the permit until the permit takes effect as set forth above. Site modifications and improvements made prior to this permit becoming effective may be subject to removal and site restoration if a timely appeal is commenced. NOTE: The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 19 No Text Project Name & Address Property Owner Effective Date TOTAL IMPACT FEE Value of New Construction: South Burlington Planning Zoning New Non -Residential Construction Impact Fees Project Completed by April 1, 2018 Type of Construction Type of Use Fireproofed Steel Skeleton or Reinforced Concrete S66 -_ - _ S88 5123 - 5133 _ - S84 SF Masonry or Concrete Bearing S69 - S96 5113 S71 SF Wood Frame Structure S65 59-3 5110 S69 S51 _ 891 S72LEE� SF Pre -Fab Steel Structure' S64 - 588 S104 S67 541 S78 S72 0? SF Industrial/Manufactu_ring Engineering &_ Research _ General Office_ _ -_ Med_ica_I Office_ -__ _ - General Retail _ _ Auto Service Facilitv Elder _Care Facility _- S54 S84 S74 8102 Total Value of New Structure: Total Value of New Structure & Contents: Current grand list value of property: Post construction value of structure & land Road Impact Fee PM Peak Hour VTEs Past payments credit: Future payments credit: OTHER CREDITS: NET ROAD IMPACT FEE $0 $0 $4,152,000 $4,152,000.00 _ 19.01 $8,860.08 $1,453.20 1 $8,694.061 Police Impact Fee Square Feet of New Structure or Addition Base Fee: $0.00 r South Burlington Planning Zoning r � New Non -Residential Construction Impact Fees Project Completed by April 1, 2018 Square feet of existing structure to be removed Creditable amount Existing Single family homes to be removed Existing 2-3 Family structures to be removed Existing 4+ Family Structures to be removed Creditable Amount Current Grand List Value of Site Past Payments credit: Estimated Post -Construction Value Future payments credit: NET POLICE IMPACT FEE $0.00 4152000 $2,449.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TABLE PD-7 ESTIMATED POST -DEVELOPMENT VALUES PER SQUARE FOOT OF FLOOR SPACE Type of Use Industrial/Manufa En . n Office ctunng g'andr'(General) Medical General Auto Office Retail Service Elderly Motels Care - Fireproofed Steel Sketloton or Reinforced Concrete Structure $76 $100 $141 $152 $96 NA $117 NA SF Masonry or Concrete Bearing Wall Structure $56 $79 $110 $129 $81 $62 $96 $85 SF Wood Frame Structure SF $53 $74 $106 $126 $79 $58 $93 $82 Pre -Fab Steel Structure $53 $73 $101 $119 $77 $47 $89 $82 SF 09/28/2017 City of South Burlington Grand List Page 1 of 1 03:20 pm Parcel Report ray For Parcel: 0860-01060. SPHINX DEVELOPMENT Name SPHINX DEVELOPMENT 391 HILLSPOINT RD CHARLOTTE VT 05445 Location 911 1060 HINESBURG RD Tax Map 48-008-000 Desc. 3.64A Codes: (1) (Category)C (Equipment) (Owner)S Wood Crop Pasture Other Site Total Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.64 Real Land Building Equipment Inventory Values: 4,152,000 310,000 3,842,000 0 0 Homestead Veterans Farm Stab. L.U. Acres Land Use 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Lease Prev. Eqpm Land Use Amt Prev. Real 0 0.00 0 0.00 4,152,000 Housesite Special Exmp Grand List 0.00 0.00 41,520.00 Misc: Status: T Updated: 05/31/2017 Last sale was: Invalid on 01/10/2012 for $0 recorded on 1051/192 Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1) Misc Fields: (0): 102113000 (8) : N (9) : 0 SPAN: 600-188-14762 October 20, 2017 Re: #SP-17-72 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, 9 /ay/mond J. Be air Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Permit Number SP- -� office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative El Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): GrAo,AL 14, E I�AoaA>LL )ouo i+NcNe�,\3Lw�. Ra S",fie 30� . Sorah �1���,Svc U- i�AO.: M4`i �Syo3 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Snm 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: c� 6 +o 6bA1 -k CLC!�O . 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1060 i-�i ne S ,u ►� 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1)LpL) 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Cii,Me-C4\ 0 C-N f <k SS i enUM% "I �5e no to bcs ���1 ACa �s Yleec , 5 r1 es-�j' (^oA,\ -�ci S C ► x\ y Q � tr �, � -`' e 1r, �;�U rt �;�r, G �j;necrs) b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): rv'rr MP c�; cs�l o � cQ or C D S 4—bW; 1 L1 555 S F Ler�� A o QU-r-?rnM� L P,rAr-A da, -2 SF c. Proposed Uses on property (include uses to remain): r-oi4- ►��P, �,cr}l 11 and size of each new use and existing d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 13: �1 SF%Fl 3 �)c�_ 5 ; +rs'p�\ A -CA SF e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): tidN6 g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): WE h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): iVO ME Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 � ��� �roc�-� Perms+ c�ecvrti•cr�c��.y, r^c ��� �0 2c�1� � 2�,► 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing (S Is % / 3 N'),� sq. ft. Proposed ti) N % / k j A sq. ft. nis Oiow,5-c- b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing L0.30 % / 1 % � 162 sq. ft. Proposed N \/) % / M\A sq. ft. n c. Front yard (along each street) Existing � ,Fs % / 151 UL � sq. ft. Proposed N A % l /U JA sq. ft. ,Ao CVNW 4 �- d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) NONE * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ Nuiy l b. Landscaping: $ / J 0t1 L c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): NoNe 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): NOP6 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: /VC)NC 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: l7Ne 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the Pine of submitting the site plan application in accordance with -the city's fee schedule. 1 'Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. A SVNATURE ICA-AT r. [ / �(- i�bwr- L, ATURE OF PVOBI- °1"V O WAER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Inco le 41 Administrative t6ficer ate The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 4 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 No Text 7 �IX�lv //0 -� UV 1�-3�1 5°vo 9/�L12/1� PO s, nay_ I' rfg May 1, 2017 Re: #SP-17-24 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, /ayyond J. Bfii Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com A0a, OF 16*4 southburfiligio PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-- (office use only) APPL ATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative El Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax 4AWAL H,'CL'rk%aA,.KH 161.h PtKb33KfzL, RD gwlu s6l Saan-M rzu► P Ipw, Vr o>+ncb : `d02. as • gaco r, ,-x :e)02•e)5',i•-15y4 05,11)3 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax ft Cr &M6) 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): ( -SPrM C-) 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: `3 ,e I t o, 66 a k k@ l G�s o• G o rn 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ( D (, a k t tz v3 fl� KQ,; (26 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): O 8 (. O — 0 10 4� O 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain NA Y you wa/pproval for): ROVIN D rwor? -k-C>rZ `rRe. Cdeg; *Pcope 1NcL.uD6S CIF MMW4F gyuyz csY2 1i- Rt��K Rci2 ?o T-Lk Lt *RgrA . b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): VOAA. MLOLCAL. 1:55VrI66 FrZACi(,13'-., 7CSTkc.1, G, l 865 sF c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): -62 Jy1 M Ickt., eVf:cZzz, (e",r ,, 16,S65 sr- M 0_> CA-tr st.. (N dam) 'Z .1415 s F d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 13, 416 srlo: t,co2 ; S rwcs2S; -roVkL AeOA -r W 0,14?, 4 sF e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 55' OX 1 s-rl, Peic-r-�JrJ�,� Ls f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): NO1J(E' g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): �R t5 POD Oft N91-0 !PF5� — !o MA' g c-Fl 1 LZ 2ZN3 — � Z7 h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): MOD tr—icx1bJ3 'fb s7(Te-Q)c52 Ts2t7XK_ ikTZ— —M� �/�c-2o h1►�� NUT C►-�AN� �' '�'2DPD 1Z�(c�N G1F 1�'�-21/loY1.S 'jz� 1MP67ZNItAS- 5LATZ0 rVS. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ► t Za tc� - 2c> � t T�v�l�A ltJ� �o�5i�2v�c-t1o1.1. 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: /.54., / 6. Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 8 . % / 1$, C-( IS sq. ft. Proposed IVA- % / IVA sq. ft. (Ivo Cy"er) b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 49. 3p % l ��� 16 2 sq. ft. Proposed / l+ %/ IVA sq. ft. (/ve) CMA Are, 6) c. Front yard (along each street) Existing q, % / / �z p(s'3 sq. ft. Proposed /V4 % / A,,4 sq. ft. (NU C.Nf1"6) d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) /VO%/�F' * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: $ c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): Tv P! 4 `P /NGGt�� 54-16H7 g'mNSiON Tb /67no sr /dy o 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC -9' (%tom f3wG) a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): yn M `/o elw,510" 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 6 - 7 Awl /hV J el - 5 PM 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: /14Oi1100 Y — &4" 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 08 3/ -Zv/ 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this applicat' n has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my owledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICKNI .i Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: / Y//� REVIEW AUTHORITY: FIDevelopment Review Board FAdministrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete jo/,� PROte W/-� Administrativ Officer Da e The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ray From: ray Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 2:16 PM To: geltabbakh@Icgo.com' Subject: RE: Day Care (preschool) at the Sphinx building I just reviewed the site plan application you submitted and I have a few comments. 1. The application must include the number of students in the day care facility. 2. The application must include the square footage of the building, the square footage of general office space, and the square footage of vacant space. 3. The site plan must include the landscaping plan. 4. The site plan must include the area for the playground. 5. The site plan must include all the site plan requirements i.e. a bike rack, snow storage area(s), the location of the exterior light poles, dumpster enclosure, etc. All the above information is necessary to have a complete application. If you have any questions, please let me know. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburi.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitv.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, till e-mail, a -mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City gfficial or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. Ifyou have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: geltabbakh@lcgo.com [mailto:geltabbakh@Icgo.com] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 5:37 PM To: ray <ray@sburl.com> Subject: RE: Day Care (preschool) at the Sphinx building See you then. From: ray [mailto:ray(a)sburl.com] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 4:28 PM To: geltabbakh(&Icgo.com Subject: RE: Day Care (preschool) at the Sphinx building Any time after 10:00 am. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 ray From: geltabbakh@lcgo.com Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 4:01 PM To: ray Cc: 'Ann Vivian' Subject: RE: 1060 Hinesburg Rd - PreSchool Ray, We estimate that the area under the large play structure that might be impervious will be 90 SF. This will make the new impervious area in the whole building 78,252 SF (78,162 + 90) or 49.36% instead of the current which is 49.30%. Gamal From: ray [mailto:ray@sburl.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 3:42 PM To: geltabbakh@lcgo.com Cc: 'Ann Vivian' Subject: RE: 1060 Hinesburg Rd - PreSchool Maybe you could estimate the area based on the largest structure you might use. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburi.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or stuff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. Ifyou have received this message in error, please notifyus immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: geltabbakh@lcgo.com [mailto:geltabbakh@lcgo.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 3:31 PM To: ray <ray@sburl.com> Cc: 'Ann Vivian' <av@gvvarchitects.com> Subject: RE: 1060 Hinesburg Rd - PreSchool It seems to me that the area under a large play structure is going to be very small and it could be pervious as well if the play structure has legs. For example if we have a picnic table in the yard, is the area under the picnic table impervious? It seems to me that the area under the picnic table is pervious as the table stands on 4 legs that do not cover any significant area. I honestly do not know how to judge the area that could be covered by a large play structure before we get this structure. These structures will not have concrete bases and will be attached to the ground underneath through legs. How much do these legs cover? It could not be that much. Gamal From: ray [mailto:ray@sburl.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 12:56 PM ., C" 1 A Uj Q Z cc X O U- zq J W O Z C >fc LANDSCAPING: SEE SHEET L-1 *PARKING: USE & OCCUPANCY SITE LIGHTING: SEE SHEET C-3 # REQUIRED SPACES FOR EXISING B (MEDICAL) OCCUPANCY: 141 TOTAL LEASABLE AREA: 36,908 SF # REQUIRED SPACES FOR PROPOSED E (DAYCARE) OCCUPANCY: 10 CURRENT MED. OFFICE USE: 16,865 SF TOTAL # SPACES REQUIRED FOR SITE: 151 CURRENT VACANCY: 20,042 SF TOTAL # SPACES PROVIDED AT SITE: 164 PROPOSED PRESCHOOL/DAYCARE: 2,415 SF PROPOSED VACANCY: 17,627 SF = Supplemental notes & additional information contributed by: GVV Architects Inc. 284 South Union St., Burlington, Vermont 05401 11 APRIL 2017 _ --------- ------------ -___—_._._ * 1100 HINESBURG RD: 3 STORY BLDG EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING AREA: Fffli 13,478 SF PER FLOOR # OF FLOORS = 3 EXISTING * �� BIKE RACK (SHEETS: C1.11 C1.2 / C2.0 / C2.1 1060 HINESBURG RD *PROPOSED V I I I I ITINT/ v,111l111-1 - EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE* J I I I I I I I * EXISTING PARKING LOT; 164 SPACES JTTIHM I I I I H I PROPERTYLINE 1050 HINESBURG D: 2 STORY BLD EXISTING BUILDING 1-i SITE ENGINEER: CIYIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIAMES. INC. IOUNISRELD VIEWIANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 B02ABa2323 FAX: 802-884-22�f web: wx+v.cee Ncom DRAAN BRR ----------------------- CRRCREO SA VT ROUTE 11 APPROVRD SAV CLIENT: SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC 391 HILLS POINT RD. CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 I I I I 1 f�illlltl�l�j APPROXIMATE PROPEPTY LINE III Rlllliitllllll lllltll�l�l+lllltlllltl ljlllttil1111 It l�lll Illlli4l IRINA F1lYtl APPROXIMATE SETBA¢K LINE jEXISTINGSNOW �—.. l 1 1111 Y1j �u 1111 111 L 1 11 __._ ..._ wo ._.. -_.- EXISTING CONTOUR ___._—___.___._.__._.__.._...__`l LLlll LF}7tI t11FENCE---_------_- ELECTRIC AGEAREA— -------- --------------- UNDERGROUND ELECT J— ---- _------------ .____._ FORCEMAIN _______________________ _ GAS — --- .---- .--------- .---- .— STORM _________________________ WATER SWALE STREAM ��....��.��-���.-..-�.��-.-�....-.-...... WETLANDS WETLANDS BUFFER GRAPHIC SCALE i IN FEET) I I Inch = 30 It. OPROJT.CT: PROPOSED DAYCARE O FACILITY 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD SO. BURLINGOTN, VT 05403 ^If I STJNO'US NHOLE u'C CAIN ® I SH `0.., UTILITYLE a-0� LIGE —> I GUPOLE T SI i DES TREE COTREE EDRUSHIWiO IRPIPE F0l O 1 COMONUA LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE OVERALL EXISTING SITE PLAN BENCHMARK nnre 912012016 R�•,R 1" = 30, PROD. - RESS PLANS 16188 — NUMBER C1.0 I BATHROOM (83.5 SF)\� CRIB CRIB U I INFANT ' l� KITCHEN SLEEPING \ e'xIr(9B5Fl SIC PROPOSED E - AREA p DAYCARE/PRESCHOOL TODDLER PLAY AREA CRIB 17'X1V CRIB L — — 2,415 SF „ PRESCHOOL x2s(299sFl n7DSFl BATHROOM (80 SF)/ L PLAY X 20- (000 SF) CRIB CRIB AREA % V OI CRIB CRIB ABED OPENING UNDER CLASSROOM AREA CROSSMEMBER (7' HIGH INFANT 5NX 6' ( 99 SF) (616 SF) o OPENING) DIAPER O I CHANGING 0 e COUNTER /--NEW DOOR TO STAIRWELL S, AREA TO ACCESS PLAYGROUND/EXIT j] 10'x11L& r Q O CURRIES I1 (104 SF) zs'xr 1ssFl ------ UP ym MECHANICAL ROOM HALLWAY mN x STAIRS 0 LO BY COAT CLOSET �� � HALLWAY CUB TES ENTRANCE 12' X 2' (24 SF) RECEPTION f� C BATHROOM STAIRS _... OF CONSTRUCTION �c EXISTING B - MEDICAL OFFICE +/- 2500 SF �k DETAIL: PROPOSED OCCUPANCY PRESCHOOL: (3 YRS - KINDERGARTEN) 40 CHILDREN (MAX) 4 STAFF DAYCARE: (INFANT, TODDLER, PRESCHOOL) 38 CHILDREN (MAX) 6 STAFF /GATETHROUGH / FENCE C" r SITE ENGINEER: : zRro f LEGEND CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. PROPOSED WALL 10 MANSFIELD VIEWLANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 --. ROOM TYPE (OPENAREA, NO PHYSICAL WALLS) 8,2-BBa — FAY BO2A60.22n wea" ww..cee Hcan — — — EXISTING VENT — — — — — — — PROPOSED VENT roerRlcxT z - EXISTING WASTE LINE DR BRR PROPOSED WASTE LINE RECEED w PROPOSED WATER LINE SAV APPROVED SAV 33.70' CLIENT: 2�82' 5.w SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC PROPOSED FENCE AROUND PLAYGROUND AREA 391 HILLS POINT RD. 1, CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 -TOTAL PROPOSED PLAYGOURND AREA U.5O' X 33.70' (1s00 SF) BREAKAREALIMITS (NO DEFINING LIMIT) T CURRENT BREAK AREA o I / 27.8E X 44.50' (1237.5 SF) 4 I PROPOSED LIMIT OF DAYCARE PLAYGROUND ' AREA (AREA TO BE SURROUNDED BY FENCE I FOR CONTAINMENT) I I REAKAREA L/M/TS SUFFICIENT CUSHIONING VENT BARRIER) MATERIAL SHALL BE IN PLACE AROUND AND UNDER CLIMBERS, SLIDES, SWINGS, ETC. THAT ALLOW A CHILD TO ACHIEVE A HEIGHT OF OVER 30'. TOTAL AREA (OUTDOOR): 1,500x SF 1 PERSON PER 76SF (REQUIREMENT FOR DAYCARE OUTDOOR DESIGN CONDITIONS) MAXIMUM ALLOWED PEOPLE IN THIS AREA (PER LICENSING REGULATIONS FOR CENTER BARED CHILD CARE AND PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS): 20 PEOPLE * = Supplemental notes & additional information contributed by: GVV Architects Inc. 284 South Union St., Burlington, Vermont 05401 11 APRIL 2017 PROJECT: PROPOSED DAYCARE FACILITY 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD SO. BURLINGOTN, VT 05403 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE BATE CHECKER REVISION PROPOSED CONDITIONS PLAN J _ ;DATE RwD NUMBER 9/20/2016 RAPHIC SCALE s1 "= 5' PROGRESS PLANS i PROI. N0. �cl 1 FEST > et. 1, 16188 LEGEND SITE ENGINEiERF: EXIST- XIS TING 20' SANITARY 392 EXISTING CONTOUR INV-385.7 SPANIEL PROPERTIES LLC & Fnvoa EASEMENT aTY AVALANCHE DEVELOPMENT LLC - _ l / { sr. �jt, t2�pRE / of SOUTH BURu /TOn I I 39z PROPOSED CONTOUR -ST- / / // / /lN APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. 11 / / / -b ' / N / ___ ___- SETBACK LINE 10 MANSFIELD WEW LANE, SOUTH BUURLINGGON,�VT 05I03 423' �� _ / ..!' rm2aea 2aza Far eozaac22 I e Rcom 1 I6 0 �B L - EASEMENT UNE - J 1 coma -SS- - GRAVITY SEWER LINE + 1 I cN G - - GAS LINE DtunN � © eo11 .w. EICRTs ReseRveD I - W - - WATER LINE MJW POND I l/ cl¢cxED UE -UNDERGROUND ELECTRI C DSM -ST--STORM DRAINAGE LNE✓ RITMU3 INV-38f2 I G SEWER MANHOLE DSM / I x 8 I I �, I G I I / 1 { / / / I ~ ~ / ® HYDRANT OWNER: - G - 8x6 REDU�ER INSTALL 12 I / / / I / ~ -...0 / / / OWNER: TAPPING SLEEVE 7 01 / / / _^ AND VALVE -SS- - ` W _ Ww- / 1 W / / / / / 1 _ I85.1' I / ® CATCH BASIN m I I I I ss SS ______1')1 /1 I, I / I I // / / / / // / L / / /,/ ,/ / / / 1 , I j I ,iI _7•..~rE•LN•- T/ �li LEVEL YARD DRAIN m#4 SPREADER ---_ SPHINXSPOE MOUNTED LGH�DEVEL_WD UGHT OPMENT, LLC If AR RIM-1398.5 BUILDING MOUNTED UGHT 391 HILLS POINT RD.m #2 RIM-404.5 INVi394HDPE ST I NV=396.5 1; \ / / // �-�pp -G / I - - -- CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 I I I "HOP EXISTING SMH 1 , X-/ o _ \ 1 I ,L l / , / S4M DRAIN RI=408.0' I I '-I-___ -- __ _ o"J �? / I I \ I / ` TENCH (iYP.) EMS III SMH R / I I., 1 I ( I I I / , / / / / / FLARED D / '7' ^- .._. / RIM.385.9' \ 5 I / / I \ \ J l / / / / / SECTIO(TYP.J _.// INv-378.9' PROJECT: { / I 1 \ \ / R/H1=396.5 , l l / / / ' / _ '- s BURLINGTON PROPERTIES I _ /;;J I \ I / / I1�W=3s1.� / 15"%1OPE / / / .� � LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HOPE ~= PROPOSED CB#1 - ' / / IT \ -' / ,/ ,' ; ; ( �893.7 _�_ _ _ _ = y \ PLANNED =3B8.7 /INV OUT:3B8.9/ ~'- a \ D 3T RIM �� � \ UNIT #, DEVELOPMENT \ RIM.4WO I i i 1 Nvl3ezo / l /' \\ N. \ \\I I \ 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & Y '` // \ \ Ja\ sf I I \ 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD / \s SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 RIM-388.5 I IC Z-II i \\ I I \\ 1 INV�IN �-023E8' B.0 9 66 INV OU=II I8 XV 16 PRECAST SEDIMENT TANK; ILO NG RIM-389.0 F..E, 38.5 \ S INV our---ssa I \ I EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES \ 8'X�-67yyI''lI INLINE�I II NAD/1P CC ;W/T48' DOMED GRATE STORM DRAIN CATCH BgSIN TRENCH g-35 EBgWINV=33.0 , 1 I I IIII = Supplemental note_s._&additional information contributed by : YO #6 Pj..J-RIM-.S GVV Architects Inc. 284 South Union St., Burlington, VT 05401 \ I i INV=.RIM-9.7 PROPoSd I15. HOPE ST YD#10 / VT ROUTE RIM=11 APRIL 2017 INVUTB38 .7 WIDENING.--- IyjCB#5INV-RIM=390.6NCENW G _ PER VT GAS SYS'TEAIS INV IN=387.0 SPECS. II i.. // I W TRENCH W I RVICE1ST i li II II l I 1 INV OUT-388.9 3 I 1 - � I $ I Y O II INV 8' W=23V .5 I I 1 I I BxBx6 TEE 1 NV IY ST=3� .8 INV I SEWER 1 T RIM=4000 DATe CER REVISION I W r 1 0#9 IINV=396.i� /' '39h.5 );j CLEAN O I \ I I / 4-5-11 DSM REVISED PER ORB COMMENTS 1. RIM=403.01-Y' I INV. 391.E / I -- - \ 1 1614f1 DSM REVISED FOR FINAL SUBMITTAL I 1/ - 7 INV-396.5 SS I \ \ v / / 3-5-12 DSM RELOCATED HYDRANT VALVE INSTALL SLEEVE I ST /2"HDPEI \ / TAPPING SLEEVE SS - ,12 HDPE 2" pE S ST 1 \ AND VALVE r-r - - SS \ 1 INV 6' SST=393. 1 1 m INv- L w 1 1 1 y INV 15'ST=383.2\- 40}.t' -' \ TE PH J I JN+ INV 6' SS=381.5 1 1 �I \ I by INV 15' ST=392.B 1 'GI -ST_ NCH I 1 1 YD #7 I I / / / /' I 4` CB #6 I 1 \ ar D I PI PING E� I 1 RIM=39ff.5 ® \\ �7 k7 / ;- \ �'R(-M_404.5 - I \ \ TRATI FORMER I , INV=393}To SS I MECH PLANS) I O l 3 DMH#3 5 ` , I.'' fi��\BPAD`R�RGMP�•' ® RIM=405.5 1 I • . / CB #B .0.- I _ _ ... / PROJECT 1 / -X SEWER SERVICE _ _ SITE INV 1N=40,.Qv I , / ' \ �U` ,/ \ \ i / / 1 ,COOLING / RIM.�98.5 "� TRENCH I { I / ---Y\ -.. I BENCHMARK INV OUT. 401.8 / e- Y // \TOWER PACy INV O/YT-383.5 STALL:POGF1Qu3 I _L_. * T J • I I MANHOLE '- LECTRICAY.r L / OPOSED 1 8 TEL7`PH NE /(SEEMECf� - - ./ 3 SANIITARYSEWER - \\ R/M.3859' q,7 Pry d. 1 I - 9 / / pL,4NS) / , I I MAAIHOLE a I I ExISTING SMH UTILITY PROPOSED / / 1- / 1 \ O / Jg 7 I �M/= H7B \ PATH EASEM NITEIN l?ROUTE,IB A ' l I I I ==3896 � \\ NIM-3859' / /.•.% SERVICE TRENCH / _ l D 1 F> ED AND Vf3799' FAVOR OF THE CITY TRAFFIC I. 5"HDPE I _ _ I --__ _ _ _____________ SOUTH BURLINGTo PLAN MARKINGS ST- ' ST _ _ ____ ___ _ _64ST __! ___ _ ___._____ ____ .___ -_- _ __ __ _ EX. B' SDR 35 PVC n , / N ss- - -I- - - - -/ - -5 - T INVOUT� J I =388.0 / - -�-FM- - 425' DAI£ DRAPING i+uMRER V EXISTING 20' SANITARY VIER E}SEMENT 1 15, T=390.2 AND PROPOSED FAVOR OF E E CIT Q,ATH � I I EA TIN FAVOR OF E CITY FEB., 2011 OF URUNGTON I MUNSON GRAPHIC SCALE � 3CA8 %�`� \ B/ T MH#1 DMH#2 ' s�'I� EARTHMOVING V�.J RIM_390.5 EXISTING SMH \ I �:.: I / RIM=404.0 EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC INV IN-38B.3 EXISTING 20' SANITARY I CORPORATION 20' RIM=39&7 I / I:,: EXISTIrv1 SMH I IWOUT98.0 iNV=398.7' \ y RIM= 3.2' , INV OUT=3878 INV OUT=386.2 SEWER EASEMENT IN PROI. N0. ( h FEET) FAVOR OF THE CITY ( 10169 $ I I / IRAI�R/MT 1 Inch = 20 R OF SOUTH BURLINGTON MrTlal � I LJginq a i Zl, ) erns` em� / r. I I I l+l 'r AIE Note For t S ) g east side of . building did I.e. In parking lot Potent I Snow o lands Provide continuous plant Storage Areas (typ.) pX (trench) as shown, with planting / Boll spec fled in Typical Tree - 'lending Detail. scs it__- 1 r sa h DeTeoG® ro �+ i If snrc + If -{I rare vc zGv .cc / Jul I I �1NJ rc —� LI) ---- ----- -- � ---- ----- rri��-;fir - Ir I I GENERAL NOTES 1. If a discrepancy exists In plant quantides between B. Mulch shall consist of double -shredded hardwood the planting plan and plant list, Contractor is to nobly mulch or approved equal. Contractor is responsible the Landscape Amhfiec Immediately. for providing samples of mulch to Landscape 2. AN shrubs and frees will be sprayed with the Architect. Mulch plant materials as shown on plan anti-desceant'Wnt-Purr (orapproved equal) prI and details. the that WIMer. 9. It Is the Intent of this contract to avold any 3. The Contractor shall locale all underground utilities disturbance to existing trees or shrubs on site other in areas to be landscaped prior to commencng any than those specifically designated for transplant or cavation. Adjustments to tree locations will be removal. See Tree Protection Plan. allowed where utility conflicts are clearly a problem 10. Contractor is responsible for all damage due to and with prior site approval by Landscape Architect. his operations inside and outside the contract limit Architect. line. 4. All plant bad, shrub and tree locations shall be 11. Contractor is responsible for checking spot staked in the field by Contractor for Landscape elevations and verifying proposed grades by Architects approval prior to Installation. Providing grade stakes. Grades must be approved 5. Adjustments to plant bads shall be approved by by Engineer or Landscape Architect prior to Landscape Architect. proceeding. 6aflm Conrractor is responsible for all erosion contra 12. Contractor shall blend new work smoothly with red during consbuctlon. existing gradde at contract limit Iine and/orlimk of 7. AN disturbed areas are to be topsolled and seeded. construction Nod. Pd zcs ) I f I +I r * SNOW " STORAGE alv �ecs I I 'I -- -- — Potandel SOGW -- Storage Areas (typ----------------- ) ` `I r Existing Vegetation to be Protected (typ.) LANDSCAPING & SNOW STORAGE * = Supplemental notes and additional information contributed by: GVV Architects Inc. 284 South Union St., Burlington, Vermont 05401 11 APRIL 2017 PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY Oil I S. ENTIFIC NAME I COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION I COMMENTS DECIDUOUS TREES AC 1 Amelanchier canadensh'Pdncess Dlena' SFbdblow 21Y--3'Get. BaB Single stem AL 6 Amelanchler I -A Slaaibkrw, 8'-10'H. B-0 M,M-Stem(3s, 5) ALE 5 Amelmrchler laevis Shsdblow 2la- -3"Cal. BaB Sind — AFC 14 A---11calebrea>n Celebration Maple 21/2•-3"Cal. B+B AFS 1 Acar•Ireeman slenre Glen Slennt Glen Maple 4-41/2-Cal. B*B PC 11 P-milsryana Tee Iussl Chaolld-Paar 21/2'-3'Col. B+B OB 2 Dues bloolor Swamp Oak 3--31/2-Cal. B B OBI 4 Ouercue blcclor Swamp Oak 21/2'-3"Cal. B+8 EVERGREEN TREES PG 5 PI-se 9Muw White space 10'-12'H. B+B Full foliage et base SHRUBS CS 26 Comus sedoea'Argk Flre Compact Red Twig Dogwood 3gal. Cool -B/R IVJ 9 Ilex vertitllul4'Jke Dandy Male molelbeny, 3 gal. Cont- B/R IV 69 Ilex vertidluu Red SpMe' 0-ff M berry 3 gal. Contor BR FG 14 Fothengflla gardeoll'Mt. Airy' Owed Fothergllu 3gal. Center BIR RA 40 Rhus eromalea'Gro Low' Fragrant Sumac 3gal. Cont. Bea RV 3 Rhododendron vlsceaum Swamp Aztua 3 gal. Contor B/R PERENNIALS I AH 16 1 Anemone x hybrde'Honorine Jo- Japanese Anenome 1 gal. Container AS 4 Anemone hupehende September Cham Japanese Anenome igaL Centel- CR 1s C"Id",ga ramoea'HRNItle Bbtic Besury Bugbene 1 gal. Conulner CE 21 Ca-'Evergold' Japarrose Sedge r you Container EP 40 EMlneces purpunee Summer Sky Purple Coneikwer t pal. Container IVE 7 Id.-loolor Blua Flag III. 1 gal. Container HP 44 Hemerocelllc Ed Murray Ed Murray Daylly 10.1. Centel - HIM 9 Hakonschba maaa'Aumou' Hakome Grass 1 gel. Container NF 14 Nepeta la-11 SU HIhs GI.rl .--Il I . Comalner OR 9 OSmunds regtlls I Royel Fern 1 gel. Container ORNAMENTALGRASSES MS 60 MtiaranNua elnensle ver. purpuraecem Purple MiscanthuS 1 gal. Container STORM WATER POND PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY I OTY I SCIFNTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION SHRUBS CD 8 Cephalanthua ocdd t II Burtonbush 3gal. Cont. or SIR CS 10 Comuseerlcea Red Twl9 Dogwood 3gal. Coral. or BlR PO 9 - - Phyeoumue opulNolkra Nlnebark 3 ga1. Cont. or B/R Notes 1. Native grass meadow seed mix to be *Eastern Ecetyps Native Gress MY provided by Ernst Consa-tkIn Seeds 9006 Mercer Pike, Meedv Ile PA 16335 (800) 8733321 LEGEND Native grade meadow seed mix 111, r) (hydoNative Seeded Lawn lhy0roeteded) Evergreen Tree to Remain (sea tree prolEve- daulq tom pov ..I-ng Dodd... Tree - Remain (se hasprotection Wall) 0R. Proposed kl Oacuauc T ree f 0 ` Pmposad Evergreen Tree MAGNETIC GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 ( IN FEET) 1 Inch =30ft JOB NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: ZZ o W E 0- O> _J C LU O / CD W c L X� Z_ m L_ Z � W ,,p^ vJ N� I 0 N DRAWING TITLE: PLANTING PLAN 1/31/11 DRAWING NO. L-1 No Text CITY CLERK'S �FICE 00017484 Received Mtn 12,2012 I'MOA Recorded in VOL: 1051 PG: 192 OF So. gurlinskvn Land Records Attest: RECREATION PATH EASEMENT DEED Gonna Kinville .:;vs Cleri; KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that SPHINX V Z I L151 PG: 192 DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Vermont corporation with its principal place of business in the Town of Charlotte, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in consideration of Ten Dollars, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to it paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a recreational pathway for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows: Parcel 1: A strip of land twenty feet (20') in uniform width with a length of three hundred seventy-five and 14/100 feet (375.141), lying easterly of the eastern edge of the right-of-way for a public roadway known and referred to as Hinesburg Road (VT Route 116), as more particularly depicted on a plan entitled, "Plat of Survey -Gamal Eltabbakh - 1060 - 1080 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont," Sheet P-1, prepared by Civil Engineering, O Associates, Inc., dated April 4, 2011, and recorded at Slide of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). Parcel 2: A strip of land, 20, in uniform width with a length of four hundred twenty-two and 15/100 feet (422.151), the southerly boundary of said strip being the southerly boundary of the lands 1 ' 00017484 ' V ® 1051 PG: 19 and premises of Grantor. The northerly boundary of said strip is a line parallel to the southerly boundary and 20, northerly therefrom as shown on the Plat. Said easement and right-of-way shall be used by the public as a recreational and bicycle pathway subject to the condition that no motorized traffic, including, but not limited to, motorcycles, trail bikes and snowmobiles, shall be allowed to use the pathway, except motorized vehicles used by the Grantee, or its agents, for the purpose of repairing, maintaining or patrolling the pathway. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said recreational pathway, including all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts and ramps, at its sole cost and expense. Grantee further agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this easement and temporary construction easement shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at its own cost and within a reasonable time. Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors that it will indemnify and hold the Grantor harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that it customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of- way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this easement, acknowledges that it has been donated to the City, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309 and 12 V.S.A. Chapter 203. For purposes of construction, a temporary easement and right-of- way five feet on each side of said permanent easement and right- of-way is hereby granted, together with the right to enter onto the adjacent lands of Grantor. Said temporary easement and right-of-way shall expire once construction is completed and the recreational pathway is open to the public. The within Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the right-of-way and easement such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said right-of-way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement and 2 right-of-way which shall prevent or interfere with the within Grantee's ability to use.said easement and right-of-way. Grantee ,acknowledgeS that the construction and maintenance of improvements necessary to provide access to Grantor's property shall not be inconsistent with the use of this easement by the Grantee Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the within Grantor by Warranty Deed of Gamal Eltabbakh, dated November 17, 2011, and.recorded in Book 1039,_Page 281 and 10.39, Page 283 of the City of South Burlington Land.Records.. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deed and the records thereof, and the references. therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantor does for itself and its successors and.assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises,.that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantor has good right and title to sell and convey the rights as aforesaid and that Grantor, and its successor and assigns shall Warrant and Defend the same to Grantee and its successors and,assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons IN WITNESS WHEREOF, .SPHIN.X.DEVELOPMENT, LLC. hereunto sets its hands.and seals this day of January, 2012. SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC 3 95 A ! 1 By: Its thorized Agen STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At South Burlington, Vermont, this 14 day of January, 2012, personally appeared Dr. Gamal Eltabbakh, duly authorized agent of Sphinx Development, LLC, signer and sealer of the foregoing written instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed and the free act ?andee of SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC. Before m Notary Public /mac✓�� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 2/10/15 Vermont Properte Transfer Tax —ACKNOWLEDGEMENT— RETURN RECT-TAX PAID BOARD DE HEALTH PERT. REC`D. VT LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACT. PERT. RFf=.T Return .40- _ --_--_______-_ Donna VowilleCite ClerP Date "an 1.2r2012 Professional December 7, 2012 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05408 Project: Sphinx Development 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Sphinx Tree Protection 1060 Hinesburg Road All work was performed per the City Arborist recommendations for the large Silver Maple on the right/front of the building. This work was completed by Treeworks and Anything Grows Landscaping David Wright Anything Grows agrows .comcast.net 373-8880 698 Johnny Brook Road Richmond, Vermont 05477 (802) 434-4088 Treeworks 110 Granite Shed Lane Montpelier, VT 05602 Bill To Anything Grows 698 Johnny Brook Road Richmond, VT 05477 Invoice Date Invoice # 11/27/2012 5343 LandWorks Sphinx Development Landscape Budget Summary ITEM PROPOSED LANDSCAPE BUDGET Street Trees (2 1/2-3" cal.) Specimen Trees at Front (3-3 1/2" cal.) Specimen Trees at Main Entrance (4-4 1/2" cal.) Small Flowering Trees (8-10' hgt.) Shrub Plantings (3 gallon) TREE RETENTION CREDIT (Estimated Value) * SIZE / QUANTITY 34 2 1 184 Date: 12/20/10 (installed) UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE $450.00 ea $15,300 $750,00 ea $1,500,. $1,000.00 ea $1,0001 $250.00 ea $1,750 $65.00 ea $11,960 Subtotal $31,510 Large Caliper Trees 1 $46,643.49 ea $46,643 Small Caliper Trees 1 $9,915.00 ea $9,915 Subtotal $56,558 TOTAL $88,068 LANDSCAPING BUDGET REQUIREMENT (DRB Regulatory Requirements) ..Total Building Construction $0 to $250,000 3% $250,000.0 Next $250,000 2% $250,000.0 Additional over $500,000 ($4M - $500K) 1 % $3,500,000.0 ,.TOTAL i 0 $7 5001, 0 $5,000 0 $35 000" Subtotal $47,500) $47,500 "Note: See attached Preliminary Tree Appraisal Estimate for a detailed breakdown of estimated tree values. Tree Diameter Base Value Cross Section Species Condition Location TOTALTREE ADJUSTEDTREE # Species (in) (cost per sq. in) Area (sq. in) Class Class Class VALUE VALUE Comments FORMULA COMPUTATION METHOD FOR LARGE CALIPER TREES 10 Acer saccharinum 18" $82.00 254.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 $4,006.85 $4,006.85 used $400 for 2-2.5" cal (4.9 sq. in. cross section area for 2.5" caliper tree) used $250 for 2-2.5" cal (equivalent to 1 I Pinus ssp. p IS" $51.00 254.5 0.8 0.6 0.7 $4.361.11 $4.361.1 1 6-7'H evergreen tree; 4.9 sq. in. cross section area for 2.5" caliper tree 25 Acer latanoides p 18" $82.00 254.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 $5,008.56 $5,008.56 used $400 for 2-2.5" cal (4.9 sq. in. cross section area for 2.5" caliper tree) 26 Acer saccharinum 18" $82.00 254.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 $4,006.85 $4,006.85 used $400 for 2-2.5" cal (4.9 sq. in. cross section area for 2.5" caliper tree) 27 Acer saccharinum 18" $82.00 254.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 $4,006.85 $4,006.85 used $400 for 2-2.5" cal (4.9 sq. in. cross section area for 2.5" caliper tree) 28 Acer saccharinum 20" $82.00 314.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 $4,946.76 $4,946.76 used $400 for 2-2.5" cal (4.9 sq. in. cross section area for 2.5" caliper tree) 29 Acer saccharinum 30" $82.00 706.9 0.4 0.8 0.8 $14,839.24 $14,839.24 used $400 for 2-2.5" cal (4.9 sq, in. cross section area for 2.5" caliper vee) 30 Acer saccharinum 8" $82.00 50.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 $791.92 $791.92 used $400 for 2-2.5" cal (4.9 sq. in. cross section area for 2.5" caliper tree) used $250 for 2-2.5" cal (equivalent to 31 Pinus ssp. 14" $51 m 153.9 0.8 0.6 0.7 $2,637.23 $2.637.23 6-7'H evergreen tree; 4.9 sq. in. cross section area far 1.5" caliper tree used $250 for 2-2.5" cal (equivalent to 32 Pinus ssp. 10" $51-00 78.5 0.8 0.6 0.7 $1,345.18 $1.345.18 6-7'H evergreen tree; 4.9 sq. in. cross section area for 2.5" caliper tree 33 Malus ssp.8'• $82.00 50.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 $692.93 g692.93 used $400 for 2-2.5" cal (4.9 sq. in. cross section area for 2.5" caliper tree) SUBTOTAL COSTAPPRAISAL FOR LARGE CAUPERTREES $46,643.49 Height Replacement Cost TOTALTREE ADJUSTEDTREE Tree # Species (feet) (cost per tree) VALUE VALUE Comments REPLACEMENT COST METHOD FOR SMALLTREES 1 Abies ssp. 6' $275.00 $275.00 $275.00 2 Abies ssp. 6' $275.00 275 00 $275.00 3 Abies ssp. 6' $275.00 $275.00 $82.50 Ad'ust by 30% due to poor health 4 Pinus ssp. 10' $275.00 $275.00 $82.50 Adjust by 30%due to poor health 5 Picea glauca 8' $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 6 Picea Rlauca 8' 50.00 $450.00 $450.00 7 Picea jtlauca 8' $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 8 Picea glauca 8' $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 9 Picea glauca 8' $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 12 Arborvitae 10, $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 13 Arborvitae 10' $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 14 Arborvitae 10' $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 15 Arborvitae 10, $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 16 lArborvime 10, $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 17 Arborvitae 10, $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 18 Arborvitae 10, $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 19 Arborvitae 10' $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 20 Arborvitae 10, $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 21 Arborvitae 10, $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 Tree Diameter Base Value Cross Section Species Condition Location TOTALTREE ADJUSTEDTREE # Species (in) (cost per sq. in) Area (sq. in) Class Class Class VALUE VALUE Comments 22 Arborvitae 10, $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 23 Arborvitae 10, $450.00 $450.00 450.00 24 Arborvitae 10, $450.00 50.00 450.00 34 Pinus ss . 6' $275.00 $275.00 $275.00 35 Pinus ss . 6' $275.00 $275.00 275.00 36 Pinus ss . 6' $275.00 $275.00 $275.00 37 Pinus ss . 6' $275.00 $275.00 $275.00 SUBTOTAL REPLACEMENT COST FOR SMALLTREES $9,913.00 NOTES: I.The tree appraisal methods (Formula Computation and Replacement Cost) and calculation values indicated (Species Class, Condition Class, and Location Class) are based upon the publication "Landscape Tree Appraisal" published by Michael N. Dana for Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service West Lafayette, IN Qanuary 2006). Guidelines for the Formulation Computation Method found in this publication are sourced from the Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers. Base values shown for the Formula Computation method, and Replacement Cost values are based upon tree install prices provided by (3) landscape contractor / nursery suppliers. DRAFT Andscape Horticulture • HO-201 W ;Z, Department of Horticulture Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service West Lafayette, IN Landscape Tree Appraisal Michael N. Dana Appraising the Monetary Value of Landscape Plants Landscape plants serve functional and esthetic roles in rural, urban commercial, or residential landscapes. Such plants have market value much like real estate, but that value is often difficult to determine. In the case of loss of landscape plants, however, it may be neces- sary to establish a monetary value to validate an insur- ance claim or to justify a loss to the Internal Revenue Service. Appraisal of landscape plants is not a precise process. Often, the opinion of an expert plantsman or consulting arborist is required, especially in the case of claims, which are decided through litigation. However, homeowners can get some idea of the value of their landscape plants by following the procedures outlined in this bulletin. In some cases, a value determined by the homeowner may be sufficient to settle a claim, or to satisfy the IRS. Three different methods are used by professionals to arrive at a value for landscape plants. Select the simplest method, which is appropriate to the size and number of landscape plants for which a value is re- quired. Decrease in Assessed Value of Real Estate When many plants are affected on a piece of property, or when a dominant landscape element is lost, then the change in assessed valuation may be the best indicator of value. Ask a realt6r_or land appraiser to assess the property with arrd without the plant or plants affected. A good, recent photograph of the landscape is valuable in establishing the property status before the loss. Replacement Cost Small trees or shrubs that are easily transplanted at their full size can be appraised by determining the cost of replacement. A local nurseryman can quote replace- ment costs, which should include removal of the dead or damaged plant, installation, post -transplanting care, and a survival guarantee. If the plant was in poor condition prior to the loss, the appraised value may be less than the full cost of replacement. Formula Computation The formula method is in widespread use for large, individual trees, which exceed the size that is usually transplanted. It is a hybrid of the replacement cost method and a process of extending that cost to larger plants. The guidelines for this method are distributed by the Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers and are accepted by professionals in the landscape industry and the real estate and legal disciplines. The formula is as follows: Tree Value = Base Value x Cross Section Area x Species Class x Condition Class x Location Class Base Value Base Value is the dollar amount assigned to one cross- section unit (square inch or square centimeter) of a tree's trunk cross-section area. It is based on the cost of the largest available replacement plant of similar spe- cies. To compute the base value, find the cost (usually the installed price) of a replacement -size tree from a local nursery or landscape company. Then, divide that amount by the trunk cross -sectional area of the replace- ment tree. That amount is the base value for that cross - sectional unit. For example, if a 2 inch trunk diameter Rev 3/00 Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service Page 1 of 4 Landscape Horticulture • HO-201 W replacement tree will cost $150 installed, then divide $150 by 3.1 sq.in. (from Table 1) to determine that one square inch of cross - sectional area is valued at $48.40 (rounded to the nearest dime). Table 1. Diameter and Cross Section Area of Tree Trunks Inches Centimeters Trunk Cross -Section Trunk Cross -Section Diameter Area Diameter Area 2 3.1 5 19.6 4 12.6 10 78.5 6 20.3 15 176.7 8 50.3 20 314.2 10 78.5 25 490.9 12 113.1 30 706.9 14 153.9 35 962.1 16 201.1 40 1256.6 18 254.5 45 1590.4 20 314.2 50 1963.5 22 380.1 55 2375.8 24 452.4 60 2827.4 26 530.9 65 3318.3 28 615.8 70 3848.5 30 706.9 75 4417.9 32 804.3 80 5026.6 34 907.9 85 5674.5 36 1017.9 90 6361.7 38 1134.1 95 7088.2 40 1256.6 100 7854.0 Cross -Section Area Cross -Section Area is used to express tree size. It is the cross - sectional area of the tree trunk measured about one foot (30 cm) above ground level for trees with trunk size up to 12 inches (30 cm) in diameter, or at about 4 1/2 feet (140 cm) above ground level for trees with greater than 12 inch (30 cm) trunk diameter. Cross-section area can be calculated from trunk diameter by using the formula diameter' x 0.7854. It can be computed in either square inches or square centimeters. Cross-section areas for trunk diameters ranging from 2 inches to 40 inches and 5 cm to 100 cm are listed in Table 1. Abnormal trunk structures such as low -branch crotches or forked trunks, burls, or wound scars at the prescribed location for diameter measurement require that the measurement be taken at a different location. Typically, such measurements are made 6 to 12 inches (15 to 30 cm) below the abnormality. A multi -stemmed tree is measured as separate trunks and then a combined size value is computed. Compute the cross-section areas for all but the largest stem, add them together, and multiply that total by 0.50. Add that value to the cross-section area of the largest stem. The result is a multi -stemmed cross section area value. Species Class Species Class is an assigned value based on all the landscape merits of a landscape tree species and its accompanying potential for problems. Criteria used in determining species class include form, color, growth habit, flowering and fruiting characteristics, structural strength, longevity, insect and dis- ease resistance or susceptibility, and maintenance require- ments. Each tree species can be assigned any value from 1 % to 100% but for practical simplicity, species are usually placed in one of five percentage classes (100, 80, 60, 40, 20). Table 2 is a listing of species class values for many common landscape trees of Indiana. Express the class as a decimal for use in the formula. Thus, 80 becomes 0.80, 100 becomes 1.00, etc. Condition Class Condition Class is a factor indicating the health, vigor and life expectancy of a tree, as well as its quality of form relative to a "perfect specimen" of that species. This value can be any percentage from I % to 100%, but is commonly expressed as one of five percentage categories (100, 80, 60 to 40, 20, 0). The rating is based on such defects as wounds, decay, storm damage, insect or disease damage, and poor form. Very few trees are perfect specimens. However, it is possible to improve condition class if proper cultural treatments are given. The accuracy of the value assigned for tree condition is dependent on the expertise of the appraiser. It is this judgement which may be most difficult for the nonprofessional to make. Damage to the trunk, for example, may significantly reduce a tree's life expectancy, or the damage may be superficial; and while unsightly, it may not indicate apoorer condition and shortened life span. Professional consultation may be necessary to determine this factor. Table 3 can serve as a guide in assigning condition class values. Location Class Location Class is based on the functional and aesthetic contribution, which the tree makes to the site, the placement of the tree on the site, and the importance of the location in the landscape context of the community. This factor can be rated at any percentage from I % to 100 %. Table 4 can be used as a beginning point by assigning a value based on location. Judgement will be required to incorporate functional, aesthetic, and placement quality into the value. Use these considerations to determine a specific value from the ranges pre- sented in the table. The elements of location class are: 1. Site location. Identical trees on two different sites may be valued quite differently. For example, a large, healthy tree in a remote location on a golf course fairway would not rate as highly as the same tree in a residential yard. 2. Functional and aesthetic value. Trees function as visual screens, windbreaks, climate moderating elements, architectural elements, sculpture, background, framing and unifying elements, in air purification, and can provide cover for wildlife. An evaluation of the tree's role in the landscape is essential to accurately assign a location value. 3. Plant placement. A plant's value may be diminished by a location, which interferes with utility lines, is deleterious to other trees, or is a safety hazard or public nuisance. Page 2 of 4 Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service Rev 3/00 Table 2. Species Class Values for Some Indiana Landscape Trees. Common Name Botanical Name Species Class. Evergreen Conifers Arborvitae (White Cedar) Thuja spp. 60 *Cedar of Lebanon Cedrus libani 100 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 100 *False Cypress Chamaecyparis spp. 80 Fir, Balsam Abies balsamea 40 Fir, White Abies concolor 100 Hemlock, Canada (eastern) Tsuga canadensis Juniper, Chinese Jumperus chinensis Juniper, American (red cedar) Jumperus virginiana Pine, Austrian Pinus nigra Pine, Eastern White Pinus strobus Pine, Jack Pinus banksiana Pine, Red (Norway) Pinus resinosa Pine, Scots Pinus sylvestris *Pine, Virginia Pinus virginiana Spruce, Black Hills Picea glauca "Densata" Spruce, Colorado Blue Picea pungens Spruce, Norway Picea abies Spruce, Serbian Picea omorika Spruce, White Picea glauca Yews Taxus spp. Broad -Leaved or Deciduous Trees Alder, Black Alnus glutinosa Ash, Blue Fraxinus quadrangulata Ash, Green Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ash, Green, Seedless Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Cultivars subintegerrima Ash, White Fraxinus americana Bald Cypress, Common Taxodium distichum Beech, American Fagus grandifolia Beech, European Fagus sylvatica Birch, Cutleaf European Betula pendula "Gracilis" Birch, European White Betula pendula Birch, Paper (White) Betula papyrifera Birch, River Betula nigra Blackhaw Viburnum prunifolium Boxelder (Male Tree) Acer negundo (Female Tree) Buckeye, Ohio Buckthorn, European Buckthorn, Glossy Butternut Catalpa, Northern Catalpa, Southern Cherry Plum Cherry, Black Cherry, Pin Chestnut, Chinese Chokecherry Chokecherry, Shubert's Coffee -tree, Kentucky Corktree, Amur Cottonwood, Eastern Crabapples (Ornamental) (Scab resistant) (Scab susceptible) Cucumbertree Dogwood, Alternate -leaved Dogwood, Flowering Dogwood, Japanese Elm, American Elm, Siberian Elm, Slippery (Red) Ginkgo (Male Tree) (Female Tree) *Golden Chain Tree Goldenraintree Gum, Black Hackber y Hawthorns (rust resistant) (scab resistant) Hickory, Bittemut Hickory, Shagbark *Holly, American Honeylocust, Common Honeylocust, Thornless and Cultivars Aesculus glabra Rhamnus cathartica Rhamnus frangula Juglans cinerea Catalpa speciosa Catalpa bignonioides Prunus cerasifera Prunus serotina Prunus pennsylvanica Castanea mollissima Prunus virginiana Prunus virginiana "Shubert" Gymnocladus dioicus Phellodendron amurense Populus deltoides Malus spp Magnolia acuminata Cornus alternifolia Cornus florida Cornus kousa Ulmus americana Ulmus pumila Ulmus rubra Ginkgo biloba Laburnum x watereri Koelreuteria paniculata Nyssa sylvatica Celtis occidentalis Crataegus spp. Carya cordiformis Carya ovata llex opaca Gleditsia triacanthos Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 100 40 60 60 80 20 60 40 20 80 100 100 80 80 80 60 80 60 80 80 100 100 100 20 20 20 80 80 40 20 60 40 20 40 20 20 40 40 40 80 20 40 80 100 40 100 40 60 80 100 100 20 20 20 100 80 80 60 100 60 100 80 60 60 80 40 60 he .,iasca a t-iorucuiture • t-m-ni W Table 2. (continued) Common Name Botanical Name Species Class Broad-leaved or Deciduous Trees (continued) Hornbeam, American Carpinus caroliniana 100 Horsechestnut, Common Aesculus hippocastanum 80 Horsechestnut, Red Aesculus carnea 80 Ironwood Ostrya virginiana 80 Katsura Tree Cercidiphyllum japonicum 100 Larch, Eastern (Tamarack) Larix laricina 40 Larch, European Larix decidua 100 Larch, Japanese Larix kaempferi 100 Lilac, Japanese Tree Syringa reticulata 80 Linden, American (Basswood) Tilia americana 60 Linden, Greenspire Tilia cordata "Greenspire" 100 Linden, Littleleaf Tilia cordata 80 Linden, Redmond Tilia x euchlora "Redmond" 100 Locust, Black Robiniapseudoacacia 20 Magnolia, Saucer Magnolia soulangiana 60 *Magnolia, Southern Magnolia grandii fora 80 Magnolia, Star Magnolia Stellata 100 Maple, Amur Acerginnala 80 Maple, Black Acer nigra 100 Maple, Hedge Acerr campestre 100 *Maple, Japanese Acer palmatum 100 Maple, Norway & Cultivars Acerplatanoides 100 Maple, Red and Cultivars Acer rubrum 80 Maple, Silver Acer saccharinum 40 Maple, Sugar Acer saccharum 100 Maple, Sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus 60 Maple, Tatarian Acer tatarica 80 *Maple, Trident Acer buergeranum 100 Mountain Ash, American Sorbus americana 60 Mountain Ash, European Sorbus aucuparia 40 Mulberry, Red Morus rubra 20 Mulberry, White (Fruiting Tree)Morus albs 20 (Fruitless Cultivar) 60 Nannyberry Viburnum lentago 80 Oak, Black Quercus velutina 80 Oak, Bur Quercus macrocarpa 100 Oak, Chestnut Quercus muehlenbergii 100 Oak, Northern Red Quercus rubra 100 Oak, Pin Quercus palustris 80 *Oak, Post Quercus stellata 60 Oak, Red Quercus rubra 100 Oak, Scarlet Quercus coccinea 80 Oak, Shingle Quercus imbricaria 100 Oak, Shumard Quercus shumardii 80 Oak, Swamp Chestnut Quercus michauxii 80 Oak, Swamp White Quercus bicolor 100 Oak, Upright English Quercus robur "Fastigiata" 60 Oak, White Quercus alba 100 *Oak, Willow Quercus phellos 80 Osage Orange Maclura pomifera 40 Pawpaw, Common Asimina triloba 60 *Peach, Flowering Prunus persica 60 Pear, Callery Cultivars Pyrus calleryana 80 Persimmon, Common Diospyros virginiana 60 *Planetree, London Plantanus x acerifolia 40 Plum, American Prunus americana 40 Poplar, Bolleana Populus alba `Bolleana" 40 Poplar, Lombardy Populus nigra "Italica" 20 Poplars Populus spp. 40 Purple -leaf Sand Cherry Prunus x cistena 40 Redbud, Eastern Cercis canadensis 40 Redwood, Dawn Metasequoia glyptostroboides 100 Russian -olive Elaeagnus angustifolia 40 Sassafras, Common Sassafras albidum 80 Scholar Tree, Chinese Sophora japonica 80 Serviceberry Amelanchier spp. 80 Sourwood Oxydendrum arboreum 80 Sumac, Staghorn Rhus typhina 80 Sweet -gum Liquidambar styraciva 80 Sycamore, American Platanus occidentalis 40 Tree -of -heaven Ailanthus altissima 20 Tulip -tree Liriodendron tulipifera 60 Walnut, Black Juglans nigra 80 Willows Salix spp. 20 Yellowwood, American Cladastris lutea 60 *Zelkova, Japanese Zelkova serrata 80 m areas is 20-40 noints lower than the charted value. Rev 3/00 Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service Page 3 of 4 Landscape Horticulture • HO-201 W or ion Class for Shade and Ornamental Tn Description Condition Class Perfect specimen. Excellent form and vigor for species. No pest problems or mechanical 100 injuries. No corrective work required. Minimum life expectancy 30 years beyond the time of inspection. Healthy and vigorous. No apparent signs of insect, disease, or mechanical 80 injury. Little or no corrective work required. Form representative of species. Minimum life expectancy 20 years. Average condition and vigor for area. May be in need of some corrective 60 or 40 pruning or repair. May lack desirable form characteristics of species. May show minor insect, disease, or physiological problems. Minimum life expectancy 10 years. General state of decline. May show severe mechanical, insect, or disease 20 injury, but death not imminent. May require major repair or renovation. Minimum life expectancy 5 years. Dead, or death imminent within 5 years Values for use in formula 1.0 range 1.0-0.9 0.8 range 0.9-0.7 0.6 or 0.4I range 0.7-0.3 0.2 range 0.3-0.1 0.0 range 0.1-0.0 Examples 4. Site Location Values for Shade and Ornamental Trees. Location Location Class Values for use in Formula* ;imen or historical trees 100 0.9-1.0 .,age residential, landscape trees 80-90 0.8-0.9 s and public area trees 70-80 0.7-0.8 )return, park and recreation trees 60-80 0.6-0.8 course trees 60-80 0.6-0.8 street trees 60-80 0.6-0.8 ronmental screen trees 60-80 0.6-0.8 strial area trees 50-70 0.5-0.7 Df-city highway trees 40-60 0.4-0.6 ✓e, open woods trees 20-40 0.2-0.4 fictional or placement deficiencies will reduce site location values) A 10" diameter Sugar Maple, excellent health and form, specimen tree in a city park. Local nursery estimate for a 2" diameter replacement tree, installed, is $200. Base Value: 2" tree = 3.1 in cross section area; $200 + 3.1 in = $64.50/in2 Cross Section Area: 10" tree = 78.5 in (from table) [or 102 x 0.7854 = 78.5 in 2] Species Class: 100 (use 1.0 in formula) Condition Class: 100 (use 1.0 in formula) Location Class: 60-80, Select 70 (use 0.7 in formula) Computation: $64.50/in2 x 78.5 in' x 1.0 x 1.0 x 0.7 = $3544 2. A 40cm Silver Maple, good health and form, specimen in residential yard. Local nursery estimate for a 3cm diameter replacement tree, installed, is $50. Base Value: 3cm tree = 7.07 cm2 cross section area; $50 = 7.07 cm2 = $7.08/cm2 Cross Section Area: 40cm tree = 1256 cm2 (from table) [or 402 x 0.7854 = 1256.6 cm2] Species Class: 40 (use 0.4 in formula)5 Condition Class: 80 (use 0.8 in formula) Location Class: 90 (use 0.9 in formula) Computation: $7.08/cm2 x 1256.6 cm2 x 0.4 x 0.8 x 0.9 = $2562 3. A 4" Red Oak, excellent health and form, specimen tree along city street. Local nursery estimate for a 1.5" diameter replacement tree, installed, is $500. Base Value: 1.5" tree = 1.77 in cross section area; $500 1.77 in = $282.49/in2 Cross Section Area: 4" tree = 12.6 in (from table) [or 42 x 0.7854 = 12.57in2] Species Class: 100 (use 1.0 in formula) Condition Class: 100 (use 1.0 in formula) Location Class: 80 (use 0.8 in formula) Computation: $282.49/in2 x 12.6 in x 1.0 x 1.0 x 0.8 = $2847.50 For more information on the subject discussed in this publication, consult your local office of the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service. Page 4 of 4 Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service Rev 3/00 Updated 12/9/2011 .10MM ut PLANNING & ZONING New Residential Zoning Permit: sq, ft. building at $0.per sq. ft. plus s'�6 sq, ft. unfinished basement at $0.20 per sq. ft. plus garage bays at $50 per bay plus After -the -fact of (_,) 50% [no NOV] or (_) 100% [NOV issued) Zoning Permit Recording Fee: Sewer Allocation Fee (#204) (�) Bartlett Bay (� Airport Parkway Recreation Impact Fee (#220) Subtotal $13 g.p.d x $9.48 South Village Recreation Impact Fee (#243) Road Impact Fee (#221) Fire Impact Fee (#203) Dorset Street Waterline Fee (#230) Sewer Connect Inspection & Recording Fee $63 TOTAL $ s Property Address:. Property Owner: 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com PAM southburlinoo PLANNING & ZONING November 23, 2011 David S. Marshall Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane So. Burlington,. VT 05403 Re: Final Plat Approval #SD-11-39, 1060 & 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Marshall: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on November 15, 2011 (effective 11/21/11). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the final plat plan must be recorded in the land records (in mylar format) within 180 days (must be submitted to me in time for record in a long with a $15 recording fee by May 18, 2012) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. A , J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT: 7010 0290 0000 2215 3835 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning RE: Final Plat #SD-11-39, Sphinx Development LLC DATE: November 10, 2011 al for a planned unit development Sphinx Development, LLC, is seeking final plat approv2) consisting isat 1 g 1 acre razing an existing single family dwelling and an existing two (2) family dwelling,merging parcel and a 233 acre parcel into a 3.64 acre � 060 & 070-constructing1080 H�nesb61 utg Road ]cling to contain equal parts general office use and medical office use, This application is a request to re -approve the final plat (SD-11-10) granted by the DRB on April 6, 2011. se original Pursuant to Section 15.09(B) of the cled Land it adorequired subpment missions onstand record the mylar approvals expired as the applicant failed to submit within 180 days of the DRB approval. This section states, in part: "If all required submissions accurate hen ubdivis on approval shall be void and the within the one hundred eighty (180) day period, application must be resubmitted for final plat approval." The Development Review Board is authorized s decision, staff provides hea new application, though only at the final plats stage. In making thi following summary analysis: • No changes are proposed in this application from the previous submittal. • No amendments to the city's Land Development Regulations have taken effect. • rt Since the time of the original approvals thPreviouscity s exceeded its capacity at the preliminary wastewater allocationofor Parkway Wastewater Treatment Facility. p this project has been revoked by the Director of Plannin and Zoning as uncommitted reserve capacity at this facility has ceased to be ava Tabl • Upgrades to capacity within the facility are underway and are expected to be complete this month, with a state operational permit to be sought thereafter. In view of the wastewater capacity circumstance, staff recommends that that DRB place a condition within the Final Plat approval that reads as follows: "The applicant shall obtain a new preliminary allocat on within the specified tewar alloction for thispimefr tame shall recording of the Mylar. Failure to obtain such result in an expiry of this approval." 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 0co tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 sbu 1 T I" --- 1--.---- i k� SITE ENGINEER: 1 \ n8l RIM Elf EXISTING,. 89.6' I I aEND I\II I III II I I^ �II I.I II' I //+d G / \ II / , II // :/ / ) • �II — \��— /RI —c --/— //— /\ L- ��\- — ,I/ —,-R—/E�/C/A_'F' —A�I/I \/IIu . Ts / /\I , I Lc�/ \\ I-L �// N/\ \I \ II /�G 1.I — I_/�I \-/ ,�\' \�./1 .N��/l, I/ Y1 / /,— / E'M1 PL \j�'B• _R-EAM�Cn ro "_I I -I �- 'dI1P / 1—/ I -- 1„ /—"� _/ / \IIFI / �/_/... // /—/\2I �. �/// //® .. /�1\2I;, /H / / _\/ InI °I �' �INV-385I.I7I '' /EXISTING `20' 0' SA�N.-IT 5A' RV//. �fIIII — --- o-3®OWG-9a2 -- EXISDINO CIONTOURSPANIEL PROPERTIES LLC & SEWER EASEMENT IN j FA OF THE CITY �iTomAVALANCHE DEVELOPMENT LLC OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPROXIMATE PROPERTY UNE SETBACK ME �------------- EASEMENT LINE CwcmMTncIv®. a1Trt1 1 GINIololfe(-' AfaAmSoSaOnCnA�.o.Svwm .Io NN.0 423asa Ra oseaam GAS SVLHE WATNGLINE Q. UE - - UNDERGROUND Euenx DRAax -sr- - smw DRAINAGE LINE MJW NO SEVER MANHOLE CURB OU SHUT --OFF DSM HYDRANT 17 7i Aeeeom I ' - u,aewDSM E ® YAM DRAN POLE MOUNTED LIGHTO1NER: / AREA�IpBawmuGHT ss� SS -SS- C04� BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT / Y / q I I,II} \ �ryfl/My!lLOT / I I SPHINX II I I l' I� ' —W / y Lp, / / / / r / I , / / / / // / ' I I �'-' ~ / I// I APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON, DEVELOPMENT LLC I I , II / � ,�.^MINT, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD, ON THE DAY OF 1 I I I I i / ® SAON / FOR 31 / / I I '-I' ^- —, I \ j 2011, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND 391 HILLS POINT RD. 1 / ' 1 I / or>', /III"` CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS_ DAY OF \ I I // /' I I .2011. CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 MIMSTING SMH I I K y X \ ! 1 / / / / I I ^' ( BY CHAIRPERSON. RI]I-40B.0. I I I I /. ___ _-__ T��_-./_\_ Igo / IN 401.1'? \ I 1 —^ I ! `J'� / IMII EXISTING SMH \\ I I I 4 / / 1-1 II III ' I/ \\ \\ / /' // / / / // /' / Z,_ ,'_; / \NV-378.9' PROJECT: \ , � I V / - -1--'C - ►- -7 - - - i - PARING -/ - �--� -/ / / , R.usw E�TRe � "~ -�- .== � "' - � a \\ /, , I y--' I / ' / /' If PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT / // i \\ \ \\ \\ wl 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD bomcAl kAIRa �� I I \\ OWNER OF RECORD&APPLICANT SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 ! FA�IJORAAL - v O P I \ GAMAL EL TABBAKH 391 HILLSPOINT RD. CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 \ O _ _ O I \ \ \ I F B I _1 � i & \ ` \\ \ q I ZONING DISTRICT. � WALK \\ I 1 1 \\ I I \ 1 I W I \\ \ � � f I I I \ 1 INDUSTRIAL -OPEN SPACE �sl I II \ ( I '\\ \® \\ \\ I 1 I I I I \ \ I DIMENSIONAL SUMMARY \ �89 ct 1 G I I \ I ENDING PROPOSED �- -E{E _L J r / I / I Pf�D. CWURIONS OOMyDCNS DDDmx �.' ' 8 \' I �I Il i I' ®l _. ' I I i I I i �1 I LOT AREA 3AC 3.64 AC 3.04 AC -wturoD \ / FRONT SETBAC50 43 ST PROPOSIll \ SIDE SETBACK 35' w 0 REAR SETBACK 50 34026310TROUTEII6 L1 I 2 PW LRIHT &PLUSH CURB BRDINGIC04HIABE 3.3% 6.57.5%% I I a5% %al - -- -_ 30% 23.0% 9.6% J /1 I I I I 1 ..1 illll'/D/CAP I i / LOBO TRANSITION / I I *PARKING LOT 10% NIA 10.5% GREEN SPACE SIGN RYP. 91 I 1 / / I CURB I I `PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE CALCULATION LOCATION MAP 1- zaoa W F �W I / MAIN PARKING LOT TOTAL AREA =63,400d GREEN SPACE IN MAIN PARKING AREA = 6,6570 •e I - PATH l I 1. ' i I ! 1 I AN COHCAEME 1 I I I I I 0,057 a 53,a = 10.5%WALK DATE C®[. 6XT�GN 1 I CI1RB8c ` \ \\ IMPERVIOUS AREA BREAKDOWN 4-5-11 DSM REVISED PER ORB COMMENTS BUILDING AREA = 13,481 sl PAVEMENT AREA = 01,484 sl L I WN�EiE_ SIDEWALK, PADS, ETC. AREA 3,523 sl r - - - SS 11 11 WALK ® I I I 1 \ I /' PARKING SUMMARY ' T INV- 403.1' //Ocum SS BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE =40,261 s1 E%. 15 R _ST— GRO 11 8 I \ / ZQR (�EE �CH PADu i i II 11 O SHORT 7RAN8RK)N \ © I / / / / / I / / I / 50%MEDICAL OFFICE = a0,201 +2 = W,131 / I 20,131. 5 SPACES PER 1" = 101 SPACES READ. ' 50% GENERAL OFFICE = 40,201 -2 = 20,131 \,/ , I I I I / , �� �i �I/ 20,131 x3.5 SPACES PER I"=71 SPACES REDD. \ 1 I /ACCESS ORIY PRQ/ECT TO L SPACES TOTAL SPACES EQUIII R PROVIDED = 184 (WAIVER REQUESTED SITE I I // \ 91(�PADeERN3YPST / ! I 8X18 I \ eEnraRMawc CROSS"_ _ . _ _ 1 ,'. FOR BSPACES) IMPROVEMENTS /��/ / I.�PR� + P(�.E LIONT� � T �M T \� �,~ 1'- I EXISTING 15' BIKE PROPOSED I / \ N / / i \ey/ � 6 I PATROL I I I I EXISTING SMH pg7H EASEMENT IN VT ROUTE 11B I / / / / / RECYCLWG C��'•••fff I I I / / \ 1.� RIMa385 B' FAVOR OF THE CITY TRAFFIC &FLUSH n� t� NV��3799' ............. OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAN ® I / Iy --1 --- -- -- / AURIallos Exx+e \ ® _ - - - $>? r i I- ------ - I ------ -E------ ---/-- A T -1 - - / / ) - -- ---- ------- (P �.. I -im-, - \ --- -- --j 1 I 1 ' I I a I I _ ----T---- - $ EX 6' SDR }5 PVC "� _ SS 1 ss - I - - I - - - ss / - - - - n - i- - - - - 1 - -/ - - GRASS wA aN0 J / 1 ' 425 - - - PATH -HFM- / - - - - - v EXISTING 20 SANITARY WER ETISEMENT AND PROPOSED 20' REC EATION PATH DAZE DXAIIRIG NONnXR EASEM TIN FAVOR OF E CITY FEB., 2011 1 / P1oI I / OF AV MUNSON GRAPHIC SCALE %1\` I _ \ / o o R Ao R -' EARTHMOVING �1 EXISTING SMH \{ / �:..: I 'Exlsn4�'��`' sM , EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC EXISTING 20' SANITARY CORPORATION 1 - 20' `,/ RIM=405.1' 1/ ��,( INV 388.7' \ I I / INVRIM= 68.4' / (ER }QT) FAVOR OF THE NCITY I PxD2. No. ] Ir6h 2O fY_ OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 10169 H I� �EI OI Cl) 03 ca ctWI 31 o EXUTM BULD1NG C #low o 0 CC y z co cc ►s L R r� 1 RR BUILDING #1060 BUILDING #1090 (M BrR AICIVEe) I- -- ----------------------------- s,; L -- -----�-�------------------------ i � w `I aBSTM °D SURDM I� #1100 I� SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RECEIVED FOR RECORD This day of , 2011, at o'clock minutes _M and recorded in map slide page/number_ Attest City Clerk SPANIEL PROPERTIES, LLC I V. 695 A 372 0 � I aRF -'� - T { ' TO,2 AC --------------- 2 I � GAMAL Q � ELTABBAKH m GRID NORTH V. 804 P. 665 SEE NOTE 2 V. W6 P. 24 2U 1.31 Ac. 2.33 Ac. _V—SUBDMSION LINE _ arF TO BE DISSOLVED BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LIMITED GAMAL Combined Total 20 PARTNERSHIP LLC V. 273 P. 265 ELTABBAKH 3.64 Ac. V. 804 P. 665 V. 806 P. 24 N S:Im 1 6 3 � I I APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD, ON THE DAY OF , 2011, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF , 2011, BY CHAIRPERSON. 422.16 S83"03'58"W - Survey Notes 1. Purpose of this survey and plat was to: a.) Retrace, document, monument and perpetuate the perimeter boundaries of land conveyed to Gamal Eltabbakh by two deeds of Michael Gravelin, dated January 1, 2008 and January 29, 2008 and recorded in Volume 804 Page 665 and Volume 806 Page 24 of the South Burlington Land Records. These parcels were combined and then subdivided into two new lots by Gravelin in 2004. (Ref. Map A) b.) Depict the combination of the two Gravelin parcels into one as shown Other neighboring property lines may be shown approximately and are for reference purposes only. 2. Field surveying was conducted during December 2010 and consisted of a closed -loop traverse utilizing electronic total -station and GPS instruments unless otherwise noted. Bearings shown are from Grid North, Vermont Coordinate System of 1983, based upon our GPS observations on or near the site. 3. Some dimensional information shown hereon may differ significantly from existing land records, plats or deeds, due to differences in orientation or methods of measurement. 4. Hinesburg Road (VT Rte. 116) is a public highway or street with a record right-of-way width of 4 rods (66 feet). 5. Iron pipes found are typically described hereon with inside diameters. Iron rods found are typically described with outside diameters. Comer marker (monument) proposed shall consist of a 4" square reinforced ----- concrete marker with aluminum disk embossed "CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCS - VT LS 597", set approximately flush with existing grade. 5. The subject property MAY be subject to buried utilities, easements, rights -of -way, restrictions, covenants, licenses, permits, regulations and/or set -back lines not readily apparent from normal inspection of the property or land records. No liability is assumed by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., or the undersigned, for any loss associated with the existence of any undiscovered easements, uses, or restrictions on use of the property which are not evident in the record or are not readily apparent from normal inspection of the property or land records. - Easement Notes - E1. 20-foot-wide sewer easement conveyed to City of South Burlington, (Vol. 203 Pg. 472). E2. A 15' wide x 300' access easement conveyed to Avalanche Development, ___________ ______-- __ ______ i ExismG 15' LLC, dated 4/28/06 (Vol. 783 Pg. 214-217) (now serving Spaniel Properties P cnEAnon LLC). EAM&M -- ----------------------- Sf� -`------------ Q,, �r '---- E3. A 20-foot-wide access easement to the sewer manhole at southeast o.e' Ac — comer is PROPOSED to be conveyed to City of South Burlington. avF EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC V. 754 P. 53 N83°0944"E J I E4. City of South Burlington PROPOSES to widen Hinesburg Road R.O.W. 90 by 7 feet on each side. E5. A 20-foot-wide easement for future recreation path is PROPOSED to serve the City of South Burlington, bound westerly by the existing street line E6. A 20-foot-wide easement for future recreation path is PROPOSED to serve the City of South Burlington, bound by the southern and eastern boundaries of the lot. E7. A 20-foot-wide easement for drainage is PROPOSED to serve the State 1 of Vermont, centered on the proposed storm drain line. (Proposed drain shown.) To the best of my knowledge and belief this plat properly depicts the results of a survey conducted by me as described in "Survey Notes" above, based upon our analysis of land records and evidence found in the field. Existing boundaries shown are in substantial conformance with the record, except as noted. This plat is in substantial compliance with 17 VSA 1403, "Recording of Land Plats". This statement valid only when accompanied by my original signature and seal. Timothy R. Cowan VT LS 597 LOGTX)N LOCATION MAP NOT to SCALE -Legend - - — SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE — — OTHER (APPROX.) PROP. LINE --------- EASEMENT SIDELINE `Q, UTILITY POLE ® RAILROAD SPIKE IPF/CIPF O IRON PIPE / CAPPED IRON PIPE FND IRF/CIRF ® IRON ROD / CAPPED IRON ROD FND CMF El SQUARE CONC. MARKER FOUND CMP O CONC. MARKER PROPOSED AG / BG ABOVE / BELOW GRADE E3 CORRESPONDS W/ EASEMENT NOTE © SEWER MANHOLE (NOT ALL SHOWN) ® PROPOSED DRAIN STRUCTURE ST ST PROPOSED STORM DRAIN - Reference Plats - A. "Michael Gravelin, Final Plat, 1060 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT", last revised 1/11/05 by O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC, Recorded in Map Slide 454.2, South Burlington Land Records. B. "Proposed 4-Lot Subdivision - Burlington Properties Limited Partnership", last revised 9/15/2010, by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Recorded in Map Slide 549, South Burlington Land Records. C. "Boundary Plat - Linus & Sue Wiles", dated 3/13/2003, by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Recorded in Map Slide 425.3, South Burlington Land Records. D. "Plat of Survey -Malcolm Willard Property", dated 9/22/1999 by W.A. Robenstien. Recorded February 2001 in South Burlington Land Records. GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft_ Plat of Survey GAMAL ELTABBAKH 09.28.11 TRC Add Storm Drain to Legend 1060 - 1080 Hinesburg Road Date Ch'k'd Revision South Burlington, Vermont Drawn by TMTR A�,rf/4, 2011/4, 2011 rr CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIAXES. INC, P 1 Checked by 1" = 50 IOMANSFlELDVIEWLANE, SOUINBURLINGIDIV Vr 05403802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vtcom Approved by t No. 10189 ��0H1 �11 w �� ut� SEZET 1 or 1 % The Other Paper • www.otherpapen 1-11 - ------ Classi'afi APARTMENTS V I"" Jlil.\t1CJ1\: �L7.C4.G T et us help ,you live more � l c, S th IItIEs Seruor LZvtpg andependently.ln your home. We are an �F ' £ e hu foil taaE Gox>xxiunzty th i3ux11­lington carEgivers who'suppoxt. a bettEr a end over. offors 1" 2 bedroom apartments. uah of hr life, and peace cif mind, by enI Rent includes ail utilities. l providing transportation for events IA ots` O.pt?onal livtng and health services. and appoirtrnents,'ruzanirxg errands;"' Camrnuntty.tour doing household chores, organxz>z iY ' Every WedAesaay shopping and meal prep, ,med catx at 12,30 p m, prEp and reminders, exercise; pet a i365=1109 an and plant care; and much. more° ` �s you need i-hour or PUBLIC NOTICE day, we'll be there to help. Versed > n ; It demEntaa and Alzheiler's care. • 5s PUBLIC HEARING.8S1 Call Roxanne and Ray i657-3357, W SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 118$�' 373 2l'5 , ,,_•; , �F�yy lent condition. $50.274-2087 (10/13) S] BOARD cl - FOUND ITEMS: Downhill,Ski's Mono Block 51mbs oc The South Burlington Development Review Light speed core technology Elan. Used 1. 2, Board will hold a public hearing, in the South' Burlington City Heil Conference Room, 575 SMALL, YOUNG,:. FEMALE CAT near Kennedy Dr ve/Wiliiston,Road, SB. Please season with bindings. $75; Hess toy trucks. 22 years old. (never out of box. $25 each; S) November 15,Dorset ,2011t t Burlington, 30 P.M. to consider the describe; leave message. 864-3623 (10/13) each; Singer Si gersewing ma h nade cars and ue iin cabinet B following: ` WANTED made by General Motors foot and knee yf 1) Preliminary &final plat application #SD-11-38 . stand-up capedal, works bmvery good. $150; Radio in et works with tubes, about S of Antonio B. Pomerlen, LLC to:-(1) remove the planned unit designation for the two (2) lots at; GARAGE SPACE for'wintercar storage. 777- 1956 (10/13) 60 years old. Sound comes out. $125. 881-- � 1519-1525 Shelburne Road &S Bartlett Bay Road, _ 1708 (1Q/13); and 2) subdivide the 1.91 acre parcel developed with two (2) commercial buildings into two (2) DRIVER NEEDED: Denver, Colorado to 'Sou`th Burlington. Will for ENTERTAINMENT CENTER: Solidoakwith1 5c lots of 0.92 acres lot"#2 and 0.99 acres lot #3 , ( ( ) and 3) increase the size of lot #1 from.4.65 acres ' pay gas some- one to drive Honda CRV to $. Burlington. lots of stora e. 53 inches hi g p high, 53; nehes wide and 20 inches deep. 29w x 26h' TV - T� to 4.73 acres, 9 & 1525 Shelburne Road & 5 Depart Denver anytime afterDecember6th Deliver car;to SB by December 231', 2011. " opening. Four shelves .on left side for ste- of Bartlett Bay Road 660-3136 (10/13) reo,/other'egwpm, enf (three of -the shelves 'are lb inside class doors). �. On bottom there 2) Reconsideration of conditional use applica- . tion #CU-11-02 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLCfor DIGITAL SLR camera for photo work on are two enclosed areas for great storage On' wheels. Originally purchased at Modern ' 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use Green Up 365 environmental stewardship. " Design. $75. 863-3395 (10/13) 2 (Crematorium) in unit #7,'472 Meadowland and community service project. Contact' Drive. by email only, please: Iitterwithastorytotell@yahoo.com, 'FURNITURE:4511squareglasstop/metaldin- ng 3) Final plat application #SD-11-39 of Sphinx table and 6 chairs plus servng table (di- mensions33"L,17"W36" .$1,000;2break-- Development, LLC for a planned unit develop- WINTER STORAGE for my car from No. fastbarchairs,41"tall.$100 63-7096(10/13) HI ment consisting of:1) razing an existing single vember to mid -April. 864-7227 (10/13) , ��,j family dwelling and an existing two (2) family dwelling, 2) merging a 1.31 acre parcel and a 2.33 WORK: 18-year-old -boy looking for odd GUMBALL�MACHINE: 5' tall. $225 firm. 999-9629 (10/27) lei acre parcel into a 3.64 acre parcel, and4) con- . jobs. Lawn mowing, leaf raking, gutter tr€ strutting a 40,261 sq:f, building to contain equal '`cleaning, parts general office use and medical office use, " etc. You can reach me -at 881-2541. (10/13) MATTRESS. BrandrietvSnnmonsBeautyrest ata 1060 & 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road. mattress; double -bed, firm mattress with pillow top. Extremely comfy, firm support. rei A/ Mark Behr Chairman FREE Paid$900, asking$450, See it at Sears (model: frc South Burlington Development Review Board "Copacabanal- 272-7443 (10/27) wi FREE CAT>Ta'a great home. Loving, gentle, $1 Copies of the application'sare available for pub- 4 pound, black and brown stripped, female PSAT, SAT, SAT Subject Tests, ACT, Ad- lic inspection atthe South Burlington City Hall. stray. Perhaps3-4years old. Very, smartand vancedPlacement practibebookse'tcavail- T( trainable. Great mouser and keeps the able -no markings made on book. Also m, October27, 2011 squirrels from the bird feeder. -Happy ,out- _ brand new Singapore textbooks on math tir, doors or in. She will take a walk with you. ---- - Will get along with other social cats and - NOTICE doesn't seem to mind dogs. I 'would .keep �, LASS t F 1f D OF PUBLIC HEARING ON -PROPOSED her but my 14 year old cat says no. Contact. MOTORVEHICLEAND TRAFFIC REGULATION meatbakhshil3@gmail.com. (10/13)�45EfVlCef©C50uihBuzli ORDINANCEAMENDMENT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON _ FOR SALE _ Please Check Or a J Permit Number SD ---- (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑ Preliminary X Final PUD Being Requested? X Yes ❑ No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Sphinx Development, LLC c/o Dr. Gamal Eltebbakh, 391 Hillspoint Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445. 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 804 Pq 665. 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road - Book 806, Pig 24. 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Sphinx Development, LLC c/o Dr. Gamal Eltebbakh, 391 Hillspoint Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445. 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) David S. Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, 10 Mansfield View Lane, South Burlington, Vermont 05403, Ph 864-2323 x310 F 864-2271 a. Contact email address: dmarshall(acea-vt.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1060 (1.31 Acre) and 1070-80 (2.33 acre) Hinesburg Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) # 0860-106OR & 0860-107OR 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): Removal of the existing single family and duplex residential buildings, consolidation of Lots 1 & 2 at 1060 and 1070-80 Hinesburg Road, an construction of a 40,261 GSF office building (50% being medical and 50% being _general office use) with supporting parking and infrastructure improvements. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846,4101 www.sburi.com b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 1060 Hinesburg Road: Single family house on 1.31 acres; 1070-80 Hinesburg Road: Duplex located on 2.33 acres. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Consolidation of two lots into one 3.64 acre parcel to house a 40,261 GSF office building with a 50/50 mix of medical office and general office. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 40,261 GSF for the primary building. The Porte cochere on the east side of the building was not used in computing the GSF of the building for use purposes. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Proposed first Floor Elev is 398.50 Height of Building from 1st Fir + 38.58 Top of Building Elevation: 437.08 Average existing grade is 400.20 (See Attachment) Height of Building 36.88 The portion of the building that extends above the 35' buildina heiaht limitation is primarily the top of the elevator shaft 0.88' above 35' max blda height). The elevations of the building depict the view angle of the public from Hinesburg Road and it shows that the top of the elevator shaft will not be visible from the road surface or a future recreation path. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 122 office employees with periodic visitors. No company vehicles envisioned. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): A 1.88 foot height waiver is requested as well an 8 space parking waiver as it applies to the general office use component of the building. This property is not subject to any Overlay Districts. The property is subiect to a 50' front yard setback from the proposed Hinesburg Road right-of-way width of 80 feet yielding a 57' setback from the existing right-of-way. The north parcel is currently encumbered by a 20' wide pedestrian easement on the west side and a 20' wide sewer easement on the east side in favor of the City of South Burlington . The south property is encumbered by a 20' wide sewer easement along the south side of the parcel in favor of the City of South Burlington. Subdivision Application Form, Rev. 12-2010 i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. Consolidation of Lots 1 and 2 into one 3.64 acre lot. 8. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 3.64 Acres (158,494 SF) b. Building Coverage: Existing: 5,246 square feet: 3.3 % Proposed: 13,491 square feet 8.5 % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing: 11,925 square feet: 7.5 % Proposed: 78,070 square feet 49.3 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing: 4,292 square feet: 23.0 % Proposed: 1,780 square feet 9.5 % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, I1, or III) on the subject property? ❑ Yes X No Jeff Severson, a wetland ecologist, has visited the site and did not identify any wetlands on the property. Please see attached correspondence from him b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) N/A c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: N/A 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 3.8 Acres (>160,000) SQ. FT. *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. The applicant has received authorization fro coverage under GP 9020 from the VT DEC. 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $4,000,000 b. Landscaping: $ 88,068 (Required $47,500 r250,000 x.03 + $250,000 x 0.02 ± 3,500,000 x 0.011) (Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) Attached with cover letter c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) Site Prep = $ 72,000 Roads & Parking = $ 410,000 Utilities = $ 45,000 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 975 VPD 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8 AM to 5 PM 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Mon. -Fri. 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Winter 2012 16. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). NAME MAILING ADDRESS WITH ZIP CODE PARCEL ID Avalanche Development, LLC, 35 Dorset Lane, Williston, VT 05495 Spaniel Properties, LLC, 1050 Hinesburg Road, Unit A, South Burlington. VT 05403 East Mountain View, LLC, 1100 Hinesburg Road, Suite 201, South Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Properties, LTD, PO Box 0210, South Burlington, VT 05403 Jim Doucevicz & Al Senecal, c/o Doucevicz Development, Carmichael Street, Essex, VT 05451 0860-1050 0860-1050 0860-01100 0860-1020 0860-1075 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 17. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format, on compact disk) of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 8 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT t� OF PY�OERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: I �,IX r-1 PRINT NAME The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 8 79-56 76 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 5 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 Westchester Fire Insurance Company CONTRACT BOND Bond No.: K08461089 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, Neagley & Chase Construction Company as Principal, and the WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of South Burlington Vermont as Obligee, in the penal sum of Forty Seven Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ( 47 500 ), for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, The Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Obligee, dated October 7, 2011 in accordance with the terms and conditions of said contract, which is hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, by acceptance of this bond, Obligee acknowledges and agrees that this bond only covers a term beginning October 7, 2011 and ending October 7, 2013 regardless of the number of years the aforesaid contract shall cover or be in force, and not withstanding anything in the aforesaid contract to the contrary. Such term any be continued from year to year by the issuance of a continuation certificate executed by the Surety. If such term is so continued, the liability of the Surety for each successive term shall not be cumulative, but rather, the liability of the Surety shall be limited to the penal amount of this bond for the entire period of time which such bond may be in effect pursuant to such continuation certificates. Failure to renew said bond shall not constitute a default under the contract. Any suit under this bond must be instituted before the expiration of two (2) years from the date on which final payment falls due. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly keep, do and perform, each and every, all and singular, the matters and things in said contract set forth and specified to be by the said Principal kept, done and performed at the time and in the manner in said contract specified, and shall pay over, make good and reimburse to the above named Obligee, all loss and damage which said Obligee may sustain by reason of failure or default on the part of said Principal then this obligation shall be void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect. SEALED with our seals and dated this 7th day of October 20 11 NEAGLEY & CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY \ Principal BYCk CMIL&� WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY - rety BY: - ;Adam C. Osha, Attorney -In -Fact Power" of WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Attorney Know all men by these presents:. hat WESTCHESTj R FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, pursuant to the following Resolution, adopted by the Board of Directors of the said Company on December 11, 2006, to wit: "RESOLVED, that the followingauthorizations relate to the execution, for and on behalf of the Company, of bonds, undertakings; recognizances, contracts and other written commitments of the Company entered into the ordinary course of business (each a `Written Commitment'): to Each of the Chairman, the President and the Vice Presidents. ofthe Company is hereby authorized to execute any Written Commitment for and on behalf of the Company, under the seal of the Company or otherwise. (2), Each duly appointed attorney-m-fact of the Company is hereby authorized to execute any Written Commitment for -don behalf of the Company, under the seal of the. Company or otherwise, to'the extent that such action is authorizedby: the grant of powers provided: for in such,persons written: appoltttmenl as such a[iomey-m•fact (3) Each of the Chairman, the President and the Vice presidents of the Company is hereby authorized, for and on behalf of the Company, to appoint in writing any person the attorney-ir-fact of the Company with full power and authority to execute, for and on behalf of the Company,.: under the seal of the Company or otherwise, such Written Commitments of the Company as may be specified in such written appointment, whichspecification maybe by general type: or class of Written Commitments or by specification of one or more panicular Written Commitments (4) Each of the Chairman, the President and Vice' Presidents of the Company in hereby:aulhorized, for and on behalf of the Company, to delegate in writing any other officer of the Company the authority to execute, for and on behalf of the Company, under the Company's seal or otherwise, such Written Commitments of the Company as are specified in such written delegation, which speci 6canon may be by general type or class of Wr,tten:Commitments or by specification of one or more particular Written Commitments. THE BACK OF THIS DOCUMENT LISTS VARIOUS SECURITY FEATURES M THAT WILL PROTECT AGAINST COPY COUNTERFEIT AND ALTERATION. Westchester Fire Insurance Company CONTRACT BOND Bond No.: K08461041 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, Neagley & Chase Construction Company as Principal, and the WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City Of South Burlington Vermont as Obligee, in the penal sum of Twenty Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ( 25 000 ), for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, The Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Obligee, dated October 7, 2011 in accordance with the terms and conditions of said contract, which is hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, by acceptance of this bond, Obligee acknowledges and agrees that this bond only covers a term beginning October 7, 2011 and ending October 7, 2013 regardless of the number of years the aforesaid contract shall cover or be in force, and not withstanding anything in the aforesaid contract to the contrary. Such term any be continued from year to year by the issuance of a continuation certificate executed by the Surety. If such term is so continued, the liability of the Surety for each successive term shall not be cumulative, but rather, the liability of the Surety shall be limited to the penal amount of this bond for the entire period of time which such bond may be in effect pursuant to such continuation certificates. Failure to renew said bond shall not constitute a default under the contract. Any suit under this bond must be instituted before the expiration of two (2) years from the date on which final payment falls due. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly keep, do and perform, each and every, all and singular, the matters and things in said contract set forth and specified to be by the said Principal kept, done and performed at the time and in the manner in said contract specified, and shall pay over, make good and reimburse to the above named Obligee, all loss and damage which said Obligee may sustain by reason of failure or default on the part of said Principal then this obligation shall be void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect. SEALED with our seals and dated this 7th day of October 20 11 NEAGLEY & CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Principal BY: � M�� P � Ce- U Power of WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Attorney Know all men by these presents: That WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania pursuant to the following Resolution, adopted by the Board of Directors of the said Company on December 1 I, 200H, to wit' "RESOLVED, that the following_authorrratiorfs retire to the execution, for and on behalf of the Company, of blinds, undertakings, recognizances; cot ti ncts mid other written commitments of the Company entered into the ordinary course of business (each a "Written Commitment-): i (I) Each of the Chairman, the President and the Vice Presidents of the Company is hereby authorized to execute any Written Commitment for and on behalf of the Company, wider the seal of the Company or I otherwise (2) Each duly appointed attorney-m-fact of the Company is hereby authorized to execute my Written Commitment for and on behalf of the Corppmy, under the seal of the Company or otherwise, to: the extent thai such action is authorized by the grant of powers providedfor in sear persons written appointment as such attorney -in fact . (3) Lach of the Chairman, the President and the Vice Presidents of the Company is hereby 'authorized, for and on behalf of the Company., to appoint in writing any person the auonact m-fact of the Company with full powet and authority to execute, for and on behalf of the Company, under the seat pf the Company or otherwise, such Written Commitments of the Company as may be specified in such written appointment, which specification may be by general type or class or Written Commitments or by specification of one or more particular Written Commitments (4) Each ofthe Chairman, the President and Vice Presidents of:the Company in hereby authorized, for and on behalf of the Company, to delegate in writing any other officer of the Company the authority to execute, for and on behalf of the Company, under the Company's seal or otherwise, such Written Commitments of the Company mare specified in such written delegation, which specification may be by goneral type or class of Written Commitments or by specification of one or more particular Written Commitments. i (5) The signature of any officer or other person executing any Written Commitment or appointment or delegation pursuant to this Resolution, mid the seal of the Company,. may he affixed by facsimile on such Written Commit ient or written appointment or delegatiort _ fURTI lER RESOLVED, that ihed., ag ring Resolution shall vm be deemed to 1), on oxchrsive statement of the powers and authority of off Ctrs, employees and other persons to act for and on behalf of thc Company, and such Resolution shall not limn or otherwise ail -cot the exercise of any such power or authority otherwise validly granted or vested Does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint Adam C Osha, Christine M-Slocum, Danielle M Martin, Sandra Delisle, all ;of the City of RUTLAND, Vermont, each individually if there be more than one named, its true and lawful attorney -in -fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver on its behalf; and as its act and deed any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances;contracts -and other writings in the nature thereof in penalties not exceeding Ten million dollars & zero cents ($10,000,000.00) and the execution of such writings in.pursuanee ofthese presents shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and amply as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of'the Company at its principal office, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Stephen M I laney, Vice-president, has hereunto subscribed his name and affixed the Corporate seal of the said WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY this 5 day of April'2011 WEST'CIIESI'ER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY y p` Swphcn M, Ilativy, , Vice Ptcj,idmt COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF PHIL,ADELPHIA ss. On this 5 day of April, AD. 2011 before me, a Notary Public of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in and for the County of Philadelphia came Stephen M. � Haney ,Vice -President of the WESTCIESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY to"rile personally known to be the individual and officer who executed the �- preceding instrument, and he acknowledged that he executed the same, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the corporate sea ofsaid Company, that the said corporate seal and his signature were duly affixed by the authority and direction (if the said corporation, and that Resolution, adopted by the Board of Directors of said Company, referred to in the preceding instr ument, is now in force IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal at the City of Philadelphia the day and year first above written. r�.,4� w�$ ceaMkaitr+tYVit1l4.7Ntlirlr�i�rr'i.xnrralr. c f J IA9TAFirAl r ! �Pul cav d �c �.i�Lkll@I'!�y, t~iCrr'+aF 'Mwaiy P.:nlrr 1, the undersigned Assistant Secretary of the WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the original POWER OF' V fTORNFY`, of I which the foregoing is a substantially true and correct copy, is in full force and effect. In witness whereof, i have hereunto subscribed m name as Assistant Secretary,% tYl y;-and axed the corporate seat of theCorporation, this day cf October, 201 ] t • :k•�1i:�.m 1. 74e1.y, Assir,tan! a:7eSAi7 j THiS POWER OF ATTORNEY MAY NOT BE USED TO EXECUTE ANY BOND WITH AN;INCEPTION DATE AFTER April 05, 2013 THE BACK OF THIS DOCUMENT LISTS VARIOUS SECURITY FEATURES N THAT WILL PROTECT AGAINST COPY COUNTERFEIT AND ALTERATION. 0 l Page 1 of 1 ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 1:30 PM To: dmarshall@cea-vt.com Cc: ray Subject: RE: Sphinx SW issue Ray, Public Works staff has reviewed the stormwater revisions to sheet C2 for the Sphinx project on Rte. 116. We approve of them as proposed and thank the applicant for working with us and implementing staff's requested modifications. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Justin Rabidoux 8/3 0/2011 South Burlington Planning Zoning New Non -Residential Construction Impact Fees Project Completed by April 1, 2011 Project Name & Address 106o &_1070-1o8o Hinesburg Road Property Owner Sphinx Development Effective Date 2013 TOTAL IMPACT FEE $101,578.oq Value of New Construction: Sprinkler credit? (Enter i if yes) Total Value of New Structure: Total Value of New Structure & Contents: Current grand list value of property: Past payments credit: Post construction value of structure & land Future payments credit: Base fee: NET FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT FEE: PM Peak Hour VTEs Past payments credit: Future payments credit: OTHER CREDITS: ROAD IMPACT FEE: 1 $5,354,713 $13,386,782.5 $593,100 $5,529,8 $8,o $7,5 97.97 304.23 ,151.99 08/30/2011 CI-) of South Burlington Grand LAt 11:45 am Parcel Report For Parcel: 0860-10700. ELTABBAKH GAMAL Name ELTABBAKH GAMAL 391 HILLSPOINT RD CHARLOTTE VT 05445 Location 911 1070 HINESBURG RD 1070-1080 Tax Map 48-009-000 Desc. 2.33 AC & DUPLEX Page 1 of 1 ray Codes: (1) (Category)R1 (Equipment) (Owner)T Wood Crop Pasture Other Site Total Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.33 Real Land Building Equipment Inventory Values: 325,100 93,500 231,600 0 0 Homestead Veterans Farm Stab. L.U. Acres Land Use 325,100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Lease Prev. Eqpm Land Use Amt Prev. Real 0 0.00 0 0.00 325,100 Housesite Special Exmp Grand List 322,400.00 0.00 3,251.00 Misc: Status: T Bill #: 53305 Updated: 05/28/2009 Last sale was: Valid on 01/29/2008 for $390000 recorded on 806/24 Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1) Misc Fields: (0): 102147000 (8) : N (9) : 0 SPAN: 600-188-14763 fft. der' r't i 08/30/2011 C- y of South Burlington Grand L_ It Page 1 of 1 11:40 am Parcel Report ray For Parcel: 0860-01060. ELTABBAKH GAMAL Name ELTABBAKH GAMAL 391 HILLSPOINT RD CHAUOTTE VT 05445 Location 911 1060 HINESBURG RD Tax Map 48-.008-000 Desc. 1.3A, DWL Codes: (1) (Category)R1 (Equipment) (Owner)T Wood Crop Pasture Other Site Total Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 Real Land Building Equipment Inventory Values: 268,000 81,600 186,400 0 0 Homestead Veterans Farm Stab. L.U. Acres Land Use 268,000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Lease Prev. Eqpm Land Use Amt Fre r..1teal 0 0.00 0 0.00 268,000 Housesite Special Exmp Grand List 268,000.00 0.00 2,680.00 Misc: Status: T Updated: 05/28/2009 Last sale was: Valid on 01/09/2008 for $335000 recorded on 804/665 Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1) Misc Fields: (0): 102113000 (8) : N (9) : 0 SPAN: 600-188-14762 rrr southburlint®n CY PLANNING & ZONING September 7, 2011 Rob Higgins Neagley & Chase Construction Co. P.O. Box 2283 So. Burlington, VT 05407-2283 Re: Sphinx Development Approval Extension #SD-11-09 & #SD-11-10 Dear Mr. Higgins: Please be advised that the So. Burlington Development Review Board at their meeting held on September 6, 2011 approved your request for a six (6) month extension to obtain a zoning permit for the office building which is the subject of the above referenced project. You now have until April 6, 2012 in which to obtain a zoning permit to construct this office building. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, &7A4 V Raymond I Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com NEAGLEY & CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY August 30, 2011 City of South Burlington Development Review Board c/o Mr. Ray Belair 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-11-09 and Final Plat Application #SD-11-10 Dear Mr. Belair: Please consider this letter a notice of our request to extend the allowable period for obtaining a zoning permit for the above referenced project. We wish to extend the period by six months; this will move the permit application deadline from October 6, 2011 to April 6, 2012. Please advise if this is acceptable. Thank you, ett44-5Rob H Project Manager Neagley & Chase Construction Company www.neagleychase.com P.O. Box 2283, South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2283 MAIN 802-658-6320 1 FAX 802-658-0349 rsl;�11. 11N1Ck 10 Mansfield View Lane Phone: 802-864-2323 South Burlington, VT 05403 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: ►nail@cea-vt.com August 12, 2011 Mr. Justin Rabidoux, Director City of South Burlington Dept. of Public Works 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Rey Sphinx Development, LLC Office Building 1060 and 1090 Hinesburg Road Final Plan Conditions of Approval Dear Mr. Rabidoux One of the conditions of approval for the Sphinx Office Building project requires your confirmation that the plans properly reflect the goals of the Dept. of Public Works with regard to: 1. The alignment and features of the proposed recreation path construction; The plans have been revised to remove the detectable warnings per your May 9, 2011 e-mail (attached). 2. The reconfiguration of the stormwater collection system to reflect the original comments from Tom DiPietro. These changes were previously integrated into the plans but we were to unable to prove to the DRB at the hearing that you had indeed reviewed this beyond them trusting my word. As such, they would like your confirmation that the stormwater collection system now properly collects the flows from the trapped area between Route 116 and the recreation path. These flows are now directed to the stormwater basin for additional treatment and peal; floes management. This completes our summary of the revisions that have been integrated into the updated design plans. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 864-2323 x310. Respectfully, 2 =D avid SL. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer Enclosures: 1 Set of Sheets C1, C2, C3, C8; 5-9-11 E-mail cc: R. Higgins (no/ encl); R. Belair (no encl.); CEA File 10169.00 (no/encl.) P:\AutoCADD Projects\2010\10169\Permitting\1-Local Applications\3-Final\Conner Cover2.wpdx AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 NOTICE: DRAFT DISCHARGE PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: May 6, 2011 — June 6, 2011 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: PERMITTEE ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER: PROJECT ID NUMBER: DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary Sphinx Development, LLC 391 Hills Point Road Charlotte, VT 05445 6499-INDS EJ 10-0417 RECEIVING WATER: Potash Brook and unnamed tributary of Potash Brook EXPIRATION DATE: Five years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft discharge permit proposed for issuance to Sphinx Development, LLC for the discharge of stormwater runoff from a new office building (Sphinx Development, LLC project) located on Hinesburg Road in South Burlington, Vermont to Potash Brook and an unnamed tributary of Potash Brook. The means of treatment includes a wet pond and disconnection. TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS The Secretary has determined that the permitted discharges satisfy Vermont's Anti -Degradation Policy described in the Department of Environmental Conservation's Interim Anti -Degradation Implementation Procedure, because the procedure allows a presumption of compliance for discharges that are in compliance with the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual and any additional best management practices that will be used to control the stormwater discharge as described in Section IX.D.Ld. of the Department's Interim Anti -Degradation Implementation -2— Procedure. The Secretary has also determined that for such discharges that qualify for the presumption under IX.D. l .d, all existing uses of surface waters, and the level of water quality necessary to protect those existing uses will be maintained and protected. The Secretary has determined that if the permittee is in full compliance with all permit conditions, including approved plans , monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping conditions, and is fully implementing stormwater BMPs required by this permit, the permitted discharges will meet the requirements of the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual and qualify for the presumption described in Section IX.D.l.d. of the Department's Interim Anti -Degradation Implementation Procedure and will be presumed to comply with the Vermont Water Quality Standards, including but not limited to § 1-03 (Anti -degradation Policy). FURTHER INFORMATION For information on the application, access to related documents, including the draft permit, the Vermont Water Quality Standards (including §1-03 Anti -degradation Policy) or the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, interested persons should contact: Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street, 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 Telephone: 802-241-3777 Copies, obtained by calling (802) 241-3777, will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) June 6, 2011, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408 or send via email to Stormwater@state.vt.us. If sending by mail, the permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the permit number should appear on the subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public hearing to consider the proposed permit. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a hearing is warranted. A hearing will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such hearing) in holding such a hearing. -3— RIGHTS TO APPEAL TO ENVIRONMENTAL COURT At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny the permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each parry claims parry status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660). David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation do Interested Persons Record and Service List Yf RA.7-1 T Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: I PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME Moll Mr. AnnoCcc - - - •�--•���+�+ rrwJCl. I VI- IN I tKEST J3v�c�, f WT 13 3 0 l 16 I � C(— 0 CL'Vt4b �'l Hai VT uvol L L---- mow. -VO'f - 14-(� VO Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAIL Mr. annRi:cc oor, "_..__ •��•�/��+v rrwJC�. 1 Ur IN I tKtb I C18/1! El Irll IEUNI Ir ASSOCIAt"S, INC, 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 March 4, 2011 Ms. Cathyann La Rose, Assistant Planner City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Sphinx Development, LLC Office Building 1060 and 1090 Hinesburg Road PUD Preliminary & Final Plan Application Dear Ms. LaRose: Phone: 802-864-2323 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Please find attached the proposed easement documents for the recreation path along VT 116 (Hinesburg Road) and the access easement to the sanitary sewer manhole located in the SE corner of the property. Both of these documents take the form of easements previously created and/or accepted by the City. The release of these documents for filing will be authorized following the issuance of the final approval from the Development Review Board. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 864-2323 x310. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer \dsm Enclosures: Recreation Path Easement Deed Access Easement Deed cc: T. Chase (w/ enclosures) CEA File 10169.00 (w/enclosures) PAMWCADD Projects\2010\10169\Permitting\City\Final Plat\LaRoseFinal Cover2mpd RECREATION PATH EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Vermont corporation with its principal place of business in the Town of Charlotte, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to it paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right- of-way for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a recreational pathway for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows: A strip of land twenty feet (20') in uniform width with a length of three hundred seventy five and 14/100 feet (375.14') feet, lying easterly of the eastern edge of the right-of-way for a public roadway known and referred to as Hinesburg Road, as more particularly depicted on a plan entitled "P-1, Plat of Survey - Gamal Eltabbakh - 1060 - 1080 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated January 12, 2011, and recorded at Slide of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said easement and right-of-way shall be used by the public as a recreational and bicycle pathway subject to the condition that no motorized traffic, including, but not limited to, motorcycles, trail bikes and snowmobiles, shall be allowed to use the pathway, except motorized vehicles used by the Grantee, or its agents, for the purpose of maintaining or patrolling the pathway. 1 Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said recreational pathway, including all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts and ramps, at its sole cost and expense. Grantee further agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this easement and temporary construction easement shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at its own cost and within a reasonable time. Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors that it will indemnify and hold the Grantor harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that it customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of-way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this easement, acknowledges that it has been donated to the City, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. For purposes of construction a temporary easement and right-of- way five feet on each side of said permanent easement and right- of-way is hereby granted, together with the right to enter onto the adjacent lands of Grantor. Said temporary easement and right-of-way shall expire once construction is completed and the recreational pathway is open to the public. The within Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the right-of-way and easement such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said right-of- way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement and right-of-way which shall prevent or interfere with the within Grantee's ability to use said easement and right-of-way. Grantee acknowledges that the construction and maintenance of improvements necessary to provide access to Grantor's property shall not be inconsistent with the use of this easement by the Grantee. 1. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the within Grantor by Warranty Deed of Michael Gravelin, dated January 9,2008, and recorded in Book 804 Pg 665 and a second deed dated January 29, 200, and recorded in Book 806, Pg 24 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deed and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. 2 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantor does for itself and its successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantor has good right and title to sell and convey the rights as aforesaid and that Grantor, and its successor and assigns shall Warrant and Defend the same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC hereunto sets its hands and seals this _ day of February, 2011. IN PRESENCE OF: SPHINX DEVELOP?�,ENT, LLC By: 1A is duly aut orized� t STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At �1 �,� Vermont, h's day of February, 2011, personally appeared erL 4 duly authorized agent of Sphinx Development, LLC, signer and sealer of the foregoing written instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC Before me, N Notary Public My Commission Expires 2/10/11 3 ACCESS EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Vermont limited liability company with a place of business in the town of Charlotte, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the AGrantor@ herein) in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to it paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality, (the AGrantee@ herein), hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of-way over lands in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, for the purpose of accessing certain sanitary sewer infrastructure, more particularly described as follows: Access Easement A strip of land twenty feet (20') in uniform width with a length of four hundred twenty (420) feet, beginning at the eastern edge of the right-of-way for a public roadway known and referred to as Hinesburg Road and running along the proposed access driveway and parking lot to a stabilized access point, as more particularly depicted on a plan entitled "P-1, Plat of Survey - Gamal Eltabbakh - 1060 - 1080 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated January 12, 2011, and recorded at Slide of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Grantor herein grants to Grantee this Access Easement for the purposes of maintenance of the existing sanitary sewer main and manholes that are located along the south and eastern boundaries of the Grantor's property. 1 Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the within Grantor by Warranty Deed of Michael Gravelin, dated January 9,2008, and recorded in Book 804 Pg 665 and a second deed dated January 29, 200, and recorded in Book 806, Pg 24 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this easement shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at its own costs and within a reasonable time. The within Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the easement areas such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said easement, but shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement which shall prevent or interfere with the within Grantee=s ability to use said easement. The Grantor may relocate this easement to accommodate changes in land use on the property provided that the access from Hinesburg Road to the sanitary manhole is maintained across a durable surface. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deed and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantor does for itself and its successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantor has good right and title to sell and convey the rights as aforesaid and that Grantor, and its successors and assigns shall Warrant and Defend the same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. 2 I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC hereunto sets its hands and seals this _ day of February, 2011. IN PRESENCE OF: 1A14 �� B y : STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC s ly authorized agent -2-A1 At ( P Vermont, thi day of February, 2011, personally appeared , duly authorized agent of Sphinx Development, LLC, signer and sealer of the foregoing written instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires-) —It 3 l a ao rks a ij G 2 2 3 5 SECTION 02235 — TREE AND PLANT PROTECTION RECEIVED PART 1 - GENERAL APR 0 5 2011 Cftaf So. Burlington 1.1 SCOPE OF WORK A. Protection of existing trees and plants from damage as a result of the Contractor's operations including, but not limited to: 1. Protection of Existing Woodlands. 2. Marking of clearing limits. 3. Vegetation protective signage. 4. Tree protection fencing. 5. Boxing of tree trunks. 6. Root pruning and construction pruning. B. All of the work included in this section applies to the protection of any trees or plant materials near to the construction site deemed worthy of saving, as indicated by the Landscape Plans or as determined on -site by the Landscape Architect or owner's representative. All protection measures are the responsibility of the General and/or Landscape Contractor and subject to approval by owner and/or owner's representative. Note: The General Contractor and the Landscape Contractor shall meet with Owner representatives, Project Architect, Engineer and Landscape Architect prior to commencing any site work to review tree protection measures and to ensure the Contractors undertake acceptable and approved methods to protect existing trees and plant materials during construction. 1.2 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. The work of this section shall comply with any and all applicable specifications and drawings in the contract set, as well as any and all applicable conditions as agreed upon by contractor and owner prior to the start of work on this project. B. Related work described elsewhere: Section 02920 Lawns; Section 02930 Trees, Shrubs and Groundcovers; Section 02910 Topsoil; and Section 02935 Landscape Maintenance. 1.3 REFERENCES A. Comply with applicable requirements of the following standards. Where these standards conflict with other specified requirements, the most restrictive requirements shall govern. SECTION 02235 - 1 i LandWorks Sect -'ton 022 ' 1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI): Z133.1 Safety Requirements for Pruning, Trimming, Repairing, Maintaining and Removing Trees, and for Cutting Brush 2. International Society of Arboriculture (ISA): Guide for Establishing Values of Trees and Other Plants 3. National Arborist Association (NAA): Ref. 1 Pruning Standards for Shade Trees 1.4 DAMAGE PENALTIES A. The General Contractor and Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for replacing, restoring or maintaining damaged, dying or dead trees and vegetation that have been designated for protection when the damage or death results from construction activities that violate or directly affect the protected areas. If incursion or impact is unavoidable due to construction activities, the Owner's representative or the Landscape Architect should be made aware of these activities so as to provide alternative protection measures. B. Loss of any of these trees will result in fines assessed at the value of an equivalent size tree, up to an amount of $5,000. C. Damages to trees, shrubs, and other vegetation will be assessed by the Landscape Architect and Owner in accordance with the ISA Guide or as stipulated on Drawings. 1.5 SPECIAL SITE LIMITATIONS A. Clearly mark all clearing limits in the field and accompany the Civil Engineer and the Landscape Architect on a joint review of clearing limits before clearing operations have commenced. Limit of clearing is generally defined as the limit of grading. Refer to Section 02230 — Site Clearing for further detail. PART 2 - MATERIALS 2.1 GENERAL A. Any products or materials necessary to complete work subject to approval of Landscape Architect and/or Owners representative. 2.2 TREE PROTECTION FENCING A. See details sheet for specification. 2.3 PROTECTION OF TREE TRUCKS AND ROOTS t 4: r SECTION 02235 - 2 ate-. .� ...... A. If approval is received for construction activity within the drip line of tree canopy, then additional measures for trunk and root protection must be used and implemented by the General and Landscape Contractor. B. Truck protection shall include one of the following: 1. Boxing: Boxing shall be 4 inch x 4 inch posts spaced 8 feet on center, with 2 inch x 4 inch rails between bays approximately 24 feet x 24 feet centered on the tree trunk, to a height of approximately 5 feet. 2. Wrapping of tree trunks with beadboard or styrofoam and secured with wood planking. Wood planking to be placed on the outside of the styrofoam/beadboard. The beadboard or styrofoam and wood planking "sandwich" to be secured by wire wrapped at appropriate places up and down trunk. C. Root protection shall include: 1. Placement of full sized haybales or plywood on top of root areas for machines to travel over. Haybales must be used if roots are at surface. E. Alternative or additional tree and shrub protection may be requested by the Landscape Architect or Owner's representative. F. Substitute or supplemental measures as suggested by the Contractor, subject to review and approval by the Landscape Architect and/or Owner's representative. 2.4 ROOT PRUNING A. Peat moss and mulch materials shall be as specified under Section 02930 - TREES SHRUBS, AND GROUND COVERS. B. Liquid fertilizer to be applied to root pruned and construction pruned trees shall be Peters M 77 Sequestered-Chelated Soluble Fertilizer manufactured by W. R. Grace and Co., Cambridge, MA 02140, or approved equal. C. Dormant oil spray shall be a dormant miscible spray equal to Volck Oil, manufactured by Ortho, or approved equal. D. If insecticide is required, consult a licensed applicator and submit an Integrated Pest Management Plan for Landscape Architect's review prior to application. See Section 02935 - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. PART 3 - EXECUTION SECTION 02235 - 3 Fes 1, ..va .. 3.1 GENERAL A. All protection measures shall be reviewed by the Landscape Architect and/or Owner's representative prior to commencement of construction activity in the vicinity of affected plant materials. 3.2 INSTALLATION OF FENCING A. Prior to start of demolition work and clearing and grubbing operations, tree protection fencing shall be installed in accordance with the following: 1. Fencing shall be installed at the tree protection areas indicated on the Drawings. 2. Fencing shall be installed a minimum of 15 feet beyond the drip line of the trees to be protected, unless otherwise approved by the Landscape Architect. 3.3 BOXING A. Boxing of trees shall be done for the following: 1. Trees which are to remain and which are not within tree protection areas. 3.4 ROOT PRUNING A. Where construction will be in close proximity to existing trees designated to remain, roots shall be pruned. Proximity shall be as determined in the field by the Landscape Architect or Arborist. B. Root pruning is the physical cutting of tree roots to minimize root damage and promote healing. Suitable means for root pruning include, but are not limited to, trenching, vibrating plow, and stump grinder. Any method, which tears roots or disturbs the soil beyond the grading limit, is unacceptable. C. Trees to be root pruned shall be root pruned to a depth of 24 inches by means of a trencher, backhoe, or other approved means. D. Backfill root pruning trench with existing soil mixed with peat moss or well -rotted sawdust to a mixture of approximately 75% soil and 25% humus. Tamp lightly to set soil. E. Apply mulch to a depth of 4 inches to 6 inches at a minimum of 10 to 15 feet radius around tree to reduce compaction and increase moisture retention. 3.5 CONSTRUCTION PRUNING SECTION 02235 - 4 De vel A. To compensate for root zone damage for cut or fill earthwork operations, prune top of tree to approximate percent of root zone area that has been damaged as directed by the Landscape Architect or Arborist. B. Construction pruning shall conform to NAA Ref. 1 for Class IV — Crown Reduction Pruning. Work shall conform to the requirements of ANSI Z133. 1. 3.6 FERTILIZATION AND INSECT SPRAYING A. Root pruned and construction pruned trees shall be treated with liquid fertilizer and dormant oil spray. If insecticide is required, consult a licensed applicator and submit an Integrated Pest Management Plan for Landscape Architect's review prior to application. See Section 02935 - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. B. Liquid fertilizer shall be applied at a rate recommended by the manufacturer and as required by NAA Ref. 2. C. Dormant oil spray shall be applied in early spring before buds begin to swell at a rate recommended by the manufacturer. D. If insecticide is approved by Landscape Architect, licensed applicator shall spray root pruned trees following application of dormant oil. 3.7 CLEARING WITHIN PROTECTION AREAS A. Selective clearing within tree protection areas shall only be performed when and as directed by the Landscape Architect. Refer to Section 02230 - SITE CLEARING. 3.8 REMOVAL OF PROTECTION A. Except as otherwise indicated or requested by the Landscape Architect, temporary protection devices and facilities installed during course of the work shall be removed only after all work which may injure or damage trees and plants is completed. 3.9 MAINTENANCE A. The Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining all tree and vegetation protection measures throughout the duration of the project and/or until such time as the Owner's representative approves of or directs removal of such protection. END OF SECTION D . _ �..-T SECTION 02235 - 5 SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD \drb\staff_comments\2011\SD11-09&10_1070 Hinesburg Rd_Sphinx_staffcomments4-1-11 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: April 1, 2011 Application received: February 4, 2011 1060 & 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-11-09 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION # SD-11-10 nda #5 Meeting Date: 1 5, 2011 Applicant/Owner Sphinx Development LLC, Gamal Eltabbakh 391 Hillpoint Rd. Charlotte, VT 05445 En_-gineer Property Information Civil Engineering Associates Tax Parcel 0860-1060 10 Mansfield View Lane Industrial & Open Space District South Burlington, VT 05403 3.65 acres SD-11-09 & SDA 1-10 Sphinx Development, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary and final plat approval for a planned unit development to construct a 2-story 40,261 sq. ft. building consisting of 20,131 sq. ft. of medical office use and 20,131 sq. ft. of general office use, 1060 and 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road. This application was continued from the March 15 meeting to allow the applicant an opportunity to revise the plans to address the Board's comments. Director of Planning & Zoning Paul Conner and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the revised plans submitted on March 28th and 29th, 2011 and have the following comments. KEY ISSUES Key issues highlighted in this review are noted through numbered italicized statements. Among those: • Parking requirements: Requested reduction of 8 spaces, supported by staff • Height standards: Requested 1.88' waiver, supported by staff • Recreation paths: (1) Revised plans show recreation path on west side of building; recreation path committee may have comments regarding design at the meeting. (2) The revised plans do not yet show the two sanitary sewer easements on the south and east edges of the property being amended to be "sanitary sewer and recreation path" easements. • Stormwater: The proposed plan includes a discharge of stormwater collected from Route 116 to the SE corner of the property that will likely flow to adjacent properties. The Stormwater Superintendant recommends that this issue be addressed prior to any approval by the Board. • Landscaping: The applicant has requested credit for retention of trees, value agreed upon by City Arborist. The City Arborist has requested a written, detailed protection plan for the protection of retained trees during construction. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements 10 Zoning District Required Proposed 4 Min. Lot Size 3 acres 3.64 acres � Max. Density_n/a n/a � Max. Building Coverage 30% 8.5% 4 Max. Overall Coverage 50% 49.30% � Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 57 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. 82 ft. �l Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. 263 ft. Max Building Height 35 ft. 36.88 ft. �l Front Yard Coverage 30% 9.50% 4 zoning compliance n/a no residential units proposed 2 SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: 15.18(A)(1)Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The Director of Public Works provided comments dated March 9, 2011. The applicant has addressed the issues raised therein as outlined in a letter from Civil Engineering Associates dated March 29, 2011. The applicant has obtained preliminary wastewater allocation from the Director of Planning & Zoning. 15.18(A)(2) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The applicant has submitted an erosion control plan. I. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 15.18(A)(3) The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. In making this finding the DRB may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. Access & Circulation Access to this property is proposed via a two-way 24' wide drive off Hinesburg Road. The proposal would replace two existing residential curb cuts on land that is on two separate parcels at present. The northern of these properties has a second approved access via a shared driveway with the Avalanche/Spaniel Properties, LLC parcel to the north. According to the applicant, VTrans has indicated that they would not support use of this shared driveway for the current proposal due to its proximity to Meadowland Drive to the north. The current proposal would place the new curb cut at the southern extremity of the property, -180 feet north of the entrance to the Vermont Eye Laser building (1100 Hinesburg Road). This location 3 SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 appears to be providing a safe distance from other curb cuts and would not likely interfere with any future development on the west side of Hinesburg Road as depicted on the City Official Map. A drop-off circle / ambulance access is proposed on the east (rear) side of the building. This would be accessed via a bi-directional parking lane. The height of the porte-cochere over this area is proposed to be a minimum of 12' 6", sufficient to ensure adequate passage for emergency vehicles. Circulation appears to generally be fluid and predictable, with one exception: a row of four (4) parallel parking spaces at the southeastern corner of the property. The Board discussed and recommended the removal of eight (8) additional parking spaces to the south of the building, which was completed by the applicant. The diameter radius of the proposed curb cut has been reduced from the sketch plan review, to approximately 70'. The applicant states that the curb cut has been revised to comply with the requirements set forth by VTrans for commercial access curb cuts on a State highway. Traffic Management Strategies See notes below under 15.18(A)(8). 15.18(A)(4) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. In making this finding the DRB shall utilize the provisions of Article 12 of these Regulations related to wetlands and stream buffers, and may seek comment from the Natural Resources Committee with respect to the project's impact on natural resources. The subject property does not appear to contain any unique natural features identified within the South Burlington Open Space Strategy. In addition, no streams, wetlands, or their buffer areas appear to be present on the property. The applicant has provided a statement from Jeffrey Severson, Principal Ecologist with Oakledge Environmental Services, Inc., stating that no wetlands were found on the subject properties upon a site visit on November 17, 2010. 15.18(A)(5) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space 10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. The proposed building will retain views of the Green Mountains from the northern and southern extremities of the property. See below for a discussion of the heights of the building. A grassed employee break area is proposed to the north side of the building, making use of these views, and a mowed walking trail for use by employees and patients will be maintained. 9 SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 15.18(A)(6) Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The open spaces on this property are largely limited to the perimeter of the lot. The largest areas are towards the Hinesburg Road side of the building, and to the north of the building, furthering the approach used by buildings to the north and south, and to the eastern edge of the property. Opportunities to reduce parking to minimum needed for function of the building should be supported. 15.18(A)(7) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for approval including, but not be limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. All aspects of fire protection systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable codes in all areas served by municipal water. The South Burlington Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided separate comments dated March 4, 2011. These comments have been addressed by the applicant as outlined in a letter from Civil Engineering Associates dated March 29, 2011. The fire chief has not yet had the opportunity to review the revisions to determine their acceptability but will endeavor to do so prior to the meeting. 2. The applicant shall coordinate with the Fire Chief to implement sprinkler connections, alarm system panels, enunciators, and emergency key boxes as discussed in the Fire Chiefs separate comments dated March 4, 2011. 15.18(A)(8) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. Roads: Pursuant to the request of the DRB at the Sketch Plan review, the applicant has provided a document entitled "Traffic Impact Assessment Sphinx Development, LLC PUD 1060-1080 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT" prepared by Lamoureux & Dickenson and dated November 12, 2010. The study indicates that the proposed development will not result in a reduction in Level of Service along Hinesburg Road. It also estimates an evening peak hour trip generation of 101 trips (31 resulting from 20,650 sf of general office and 70 resulting from 20,650 sf of medical office). but recommends a series improvements to mitigate traffic congestion and safety impacts. The applicant has proposed modifications to roadway alignments and pavements widths along Hinesburg Road in order to establish a dedicated southbound left -turn entry to mitigate these impacts, in accordance with or exceeding the recommendations of the traffic study. The modifications will require removal and replacement of existing overhead services and mail boxes. The proposed modifications will approach existing driveway entrances to the adjacent property to the north, Meadowland Drive, and Mansfield View Lane / Fox Run Lane. The Director of Public Works provided additional comments in a memo dated March 9, 2011. The applicant has responded to these comments as outlined in a letter from Civil Engineering Associates dated March 29, 2011. SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 Recreation Paths: The official city map projects a future recreational path or bike lane to be built along the eastern side of Hinesburg Road. The plans include a 20 foot wide easement to the City of South Burlington, starting from the planned state right-of-way of Hinesburg Road. Based on input from the recreation path committee, staff recommends that the recreation path be constructed at the time of development. The recreation path committee recommended either construction of the path or a payment to a city account for future construction, however at this time no such mechanism is available to the city through the Land Development Regulations. The plans have been revised to include a recreation path as recommended. The recreation path committee has reviewed the revised plans and may provide separate comments. 3. The preliminary/final plans shall be revised to adhere to the comments of the Recreation Path Committee.. In addition, an existing 20 foot wide recreation path easement belonging to the city abuts the southeastern corner of the property, from the east. An opportunity exists to extend this to Hinesburg Road and along the western border of the property over existing 20 foot wide sanitary sewer easements. Staff and the recreation path committee recommend that the plans be amended to include these recreation path easements. At the March 15t" hearing, the Board also recommended this amendment. 4. The preliminary/final plat shall be revised to show the existing 20 foot sanitary sewer easement along the southern and western edges of the property as a sanitary sewer / recreation path easement to the City of South Burlington. Stormwater Facilities: The Director of Public Works provided a memo dated March 9, 2011. The applicant addressed the questions therein as outlined in a letter from Civil Engineering Associates dated March 29, 2011. Among the questions posed by the Department is the following: It appears as if stormwater runoff from the expanded area of Rt. 116 and the new curb cut will be piped along the southern end of the parking lot and discharged near the property boundary on the SE corner of the lot. Could this water be directed to the proposed treatment pond by instead connecting it to CB #6 near the SE corner of the proposed building? How large a drainage area will the basins along Hinesburg Road collect? This water will discharge on to the neighboring property. What impacts will it have on the neighboring property? What is downstream of this discharge point? Staff feels that this issue has not been adequately resolved by the response from the Applicant and recommends that the Board direct the applicant to work with local and state officials, and adjacent landowners, as appropriate, to resolve any outstanding concerns. 5. The applicant shall work with local and state officials, and adjacent landowners, as appropriate, to address stormwater concerns raised by the Department of Public Works in its memo dated march 9, 2011 prior to the issuance of any approval by the Board. The remainder of the stormwater is proposed to be addressed on site through use of a conveyance system collecting runoff from the roof and unpaved areas to a detention pond at the northeastern 6 SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 corner of the property, and a surface forebay system leading to the detention pond for parking lot runoff. A portion of the southeastern portion of the parking lot will flow by sheet flow to a grass disconnection areas with slopes of not greater than 5%. Limited use of LID techniques, as outlined in the city's Low Impact Development Guidance Manual, appear to have been incorporated into the plan. The City's Land Development Regulations strongly encourage the use of Low Impact Development (LID) techniques for stormwater management. Staff has previously recommended the following additional LID techniques be considered: • Further reduction in total parking on the lot to the minimum necessary; • Installation of one or more bioretention ponds / rain gardens. A possible location is adjacent to the building and within parking area green spaces • Consider the use of pervious pavement for sidewalks and/or parking areas. The Board discussed these recommendations for LID techniques for stormwwater management with the applicant. Sidewalks: Sidewalks are proposed to line the eastern side of the building, adjacent to the parking area, to connect two side entrances to the building to the parking area, and to connect a front entrance to the building to Hinesburg Road. In addition, a "grassed walking path" is proposed to be maintained around the perimeter of the property, as is "grass surface employee break area." The applicant has modified the design of the project to respond to comments from the Board. The sidewalk to the west of the building has been widened to six (6) feet and a walking path connection from the staff break area on the north side of the building to the perimeter walking path has been added. The preliminary/final plats should be amended to reflect this change on sheet C1.1. 6. The applicant shall revise preliminary/final plat sheet C1.1 to reflect the revised sidewalk notation. With respect to the doorway facing Hinesburg Road, the applicant has stated in public that the doorway will serve as a open entry/exit and that the building will be designed to accommodate regular public foot traffic from this doorway. 7. The doorway on the west side of the building remains open to the public for entry and exit during regular business hours. No sidewalks are proposed to extend to neighboring properties. At this time, staff does not find it necessary to extend sidewalks to adjacent properties as the recreation path along Hinesburg Road would meet this need. Landscaping_ See below under site plan review requirements. Utilities and lighting: The applicant has incorporated the recommendations of the Director of Public Works described in his memo of March 9, 2011. 7 SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 8. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. 15.18(A)(9) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. Roads: See above. Utilities: See above. Recreation Paths: See above. Lighting: A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project has been submitted for this proposal. The proposed lighting plan indicates an average maximum illumination of 0.6 foot candles across the parking area, below the maximum allowable under Appendix A.9 of the Land Development Regulations. Average maximum indirect illumination, off the property, is below 0.1 foot candles, below the maximum allowable under Appendix A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, all proposed lighting fixtures shall be in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. The applicant has submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed outdoor lighting on the subject parcel. This lighting appears to be in compliance with Appendix D. According to a supplemental memo provided by the applicant, one half of the parking lot lights will be timed to turn off at midnight. In addition, the building facades provided by the applicant indicate a substantial use of windows, particularly on the east elevation. In a supplemental memo, the applicant has provided information regarding the timing of lights. All interior lights will be on occupancy sensors and/or time clock. Finally, the plans has been modified to remove any lights illuminating the proposed flagpole. Pursuant to Section 13.08 of the Land Development Regulations, this type of light is addressed via administrative review. 15.18(A)(10) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed development of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan for the reasons discussed above. Pursuant to Section 15.18(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions within the Industrial -Open Space Zoning District shall comply with the following additional standards and conditions: 15.18(B(1) Open space and development areas shall be located so as to maximize the aesthetic values of the property in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan goal of preserving SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 and enhancing the open character, natural areas, and scenic views of the Quadrant, while allowing carefully planned development. The proposed project includes a lot coverage of 49.3% of the 3.64 acres of land. Open Space is predominantly included to the west and north of the building, with additional space along the eastern boundary of the property. The focus of Open Spaces to the west of the building is consistent with the planned character of the area and with adjacent buildings to the north and south. The focus of the development (building) area adjacent to the street, with parking areas to the rear, is also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Due to the nature of the use, significant parking areas are required, limiting the overall amount of open space on the property. 15.18(B)(2) Open space and any buffering shall be located in a manner that minimizes impacts on adjacent residential uses, if any. Existing residential areas are located on the west side of Hinesburg Road, with a single family home directly opposite from the proposed building and the Oak Creek Village neighborhood located to the southwest of the project. The proposed project includes a front setback of 57', larger than the existing 43' feet for the current buildings on the property. In addition, open view corridors have been maintained to the north and south of the building, retaining views of the Green Mountains. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: 14.06(A) Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project appears to be consistent with the stated goals and objectives of the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, Industrial Areas. This area is located in the northern and eastern portions of the City surrounding the Burlington International Airport and extending southward to immediately south of 1-89 along Route 116. This area is intended to consist predominantly of industrial and office uses, however, it may include a mix of commercial and limited residential use. This area will serve as both a local and regional employment center. This area of the City is most appropriate for industrial and office uses as it provides direct, easy access to the airport and is compatible with airport activities such as airplane noise and approach cones." Comprehensive Plan, 3/6/2006, pp 27-28. 14.06(B) Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. 14.06(B)(1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. tiE SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 Transition from structure to site and structure to structure. The proposed project makes use of slopes on the property to create what will appear to be a two- story facade from the west and a three-story facade from the east. The transition from structure to site is additionally met with landscaping. Only one structure is proposed on the site. Planting: See below under landscape requirements. Pedestrian Movement Pedestrian access and circulation is provided by sidewalks on the north, east, and south sides of the building, a sidewalk from the front entrance towards Hinesburg Road on the west side of the building, and a recreation path extending along the western border of the property adjacent to Hinesburg Road. In addition, pavement markings will provide access through the center of the parking lot. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is shown on the plan near to the western entrance to the building. Parking Areas: According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 20,131 SF of Medical Office use shall require 101 parking spaces. The 20,131 SF of general office use shall require 71 parking spaces. Therefore, the development will require 172 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 164 parking spaces, a waiver of eight (8) spaces. At the sketch plan level and initial preliminary/final plat review, the Board indicated that it was comfortable with a waiver of eight spaces from the General Office use. As noted above under Access and Circulation, four (4) parking spaces along the southern boundary of the property may pose a difficulty for safety. Staff has previously recommended that due to the mix of uses on site and the presence of additional employment and residential uses in the area, a limited additional waiver of general office use parking spaces on the site could be merited. The Board discussed this issue and determined that a waiver of eight (8) parking spaces total was appropriate. 9. The Board supports a waiver of eight (8) spaces, or 4.7%, from the minimum standards of the regulation due to the presence of a mix of uses on the property and access via alternate means of transportation. The applicant shows seven (7) spaces marked as handicapped accessible. A minimum of six (6) are required. The dimensions of the proposed parking spaces appear to meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. 14.06(B)(2) Parking: 10 SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection. (b) The Development Review Board may approve parking between a public street and one or more buildings if the Board finds that one or more of the following criteria are met. The Board shall approve only the minimum necessary to overcome the conditions below. (i) The parking area is necessary to meet minimum requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, (h) The parking area will serve a single or two-family home; (iii) The lot has unique site conditions such as a utility easement or unstable soils that allow for parking, but not a building, to be located adjacent to the public street, (iv) The lot contains one or more existing buildings that are to be reused and parking needs cannot be accommodated to the rear and sides of the existing building(s); or, (v) The principal use of the lot is for public recreation. (c) Where more than one building exists or is proposed on a lot, the total width of all parking areas located to the side of building(s) at the building line shall not exceed one half of the width of all building(s) located at the building line. Parking approved pursuant to 14.06(B)(2)(b) shall be exempt from this subsection. (d) For through lots, parking shall be located to the side of the building(s) or to the front of the building adjacent to the public street with the lowest average daily volume of traffic. Where a lot abuts an Interstate or its interchanges, parking shall be located to the side of the building(s) or to the front adjacent to the Interstate. Parking areas adjacent to the Interstate shall be screened with sufficient landscaping to screen the parking from view of the Interstate. All parking is proposed to rear and rear/side of the proposed building. No parking is proposed to the front (west) of the proposed building. The proposed plan is in full compliance with these criteria. 14.06(B)(3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The applicant will be requesting a height waiver of 1.88 feet for an elevator shaft to be located at the center of the building. Otherwise the applicant has stated that the maximum height of the proposed building will not exceed 35 feet above the average pre -construction grade. The building immediately to the south along Hinesburg Road is of similar height and scale. Furthermore, the subject property is outside of the nearby View Protection Overlay district. Height waiver request: Section 3.07 (F)(2) of the Land Development Regulation reads: 3.07(F)(2) For structures proposed to exceed the maximum height for structures specified in §3.07(D) above as part of a planned unit development or master plan, the Development Review Board may waive the requirements of this section as long as the general objectives of the applicable zoning district are met. A request for approval of a taller structure shall include the submittal of a plan(s) showing the elevations and architectural design of the structure, pre -construction grade, post construction grade, and height of the structure. Such plan shall demonstrate that the 11 SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 proposed building will not detract from important public scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. The applicant has stated that due to the location of the elevator shaft, the portion of the building that exceeds 35 feet in height will not be visible from the road surface or a future recreation path. Staff recommends approval of a height waiver of 1.88 feet as it will not be visible from any public road or recreation path. 10. The Board supports a height waiver of 1.88 feet as the additional height will not be visible from any public right of way. 14.06(B)(4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. 14.06(C) Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. 14.06(C)(1) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. 14.06(C)(2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has submitted elevations for the proposed building. The building will be three stories on all sides, with the exception of the entryway area, which will be two stories. The materials and scale of the building appear to be in keeping with existing non-residential development in the vicinity. In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: 14.07 Specific Review Standards 14.07 (A) Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The Applicant has provided a written statement from Timothy French, Utilities and Permits Unit Project Supervisor for Maintenance District 5 of the Vermont Agency of Transportation, indicating the Agency's agreement that a separate curb cut is necessitated and that a shared driveway entrance with the property to the north would not be recommended due to the close proximity of the existing Meadowland Drive. 14.07 B Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. im SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. 14.07 C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (ie, nondumpster, non -large drum) shall not be required to be fenced or screened. An 8' x 18' concrete pad with stockade fence for trash and recycling is proposed along the southern side of the parking / circulation area. It appears that this enclosure area extends into the existing 20' sanitary sewer easement. The Director of Public Works has reviewed this and recommends that the following condition be imposed. 11. if the City is required to make repairs or improvements to the existing sewer main located along the south and east sides of the site, the applicant shall be responsible for the repairs of any damage that may occur to those site improvements located within the supporting existing sewer easements. 14.07 D Landscaping and Screening Requirements (refers to Section 13.06) Staff has reviewed the standards of Section 13.06 regarding landscaping and has found the project to be in compliance. Of particular note: Landscaping of parking areas & snow storage Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(2), in all off-street parking area with twenty-eight (28) or more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. This parking lot contains more than 28 spaces. The site plan shows islands and areas reserved for landscaping totaling 10.5% and specifies the variety of trees to be installed. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(5), snow storage areas must be specified and located in an area that minimum the potential for erosion and contaminated runoff. Snow storage areas are shown on the plan. Retention of existing trees At the sketch plan level, the Board requested that the applicant demonstrate the need for removal of existing trees and hedges on the property. The proposed landscape plan shows the retention of a hedge row between the subject property and property to the north, the removal of an existing north -south hedge row in favor of reinforcing the specimen tree layout, and the planting of new trees to the east and west of the building, in the parking areas, and at the eastern boundary of the property. The landscape plan has been generally revised to respond to comments from the City Arborist and the Board, as outlined in a letter from Civil Engineering Associates dated March 29, 2011. The landscape plan also includes the retention of several individual trees on the property. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G)(2) of the SBLDR. The landscape plan and landscape budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan and budget as part of the preliminary plat plan application. Based on estimated building costs of $4,000,000, the minimum required landscaping should be $47,500. The applicant is proposing $31,510 in 13 SD-11-09 & SD-11-10 acceptable landscaping (defined by the SBLDR as trees and shrubs) and is requesting a tree retention credit of $15,990 for trees with an estimated value of $56,558. The city arborist has reviewed the request and agrees that there is approximately $16,000 worth of trees identified as to be retained to credit toward the project. This note is found within the Director of Public Works' memo of March 9, 2011. A drawing for the protection of trees during the construction of the project has been provided per the request of the City Arborist. However, the Arborist has restated his request for a detailed written protection plan to ensure that retained landscaping on the property will be adequately protected throughout the construction of the project. 12. The applicant shall submit a detail written tree protection plan prior to any approval from the Board. 13. The Board should discuss whether of a credit of $15,990, of the total landscaping requirement of $47, 500, for the retention of existing trees on site should be issued. Any such credit should be conditioned upon successful protection of retained trees during the construction period. Additional comments were provided from the Director of Public works in his memo dated March 9, 2011. These comments have been addressed as outlined in a letter from Civil Engineering Associates dated March 29, 2011. OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS 13.18 Utility Cabinets and Similar Structures Pursuant to Section 13.18 of the South Burlington LDRs, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. It is unclear from the planting plan whether the proposed cooling tower pad and proposed transformer and pad, both located adjacent to the access drive, are suitably screened with landscaping. The applicant has modified the planting plan for the screening of utility cabinets. Staff finds the screening to be adequate to meet the standards of this section. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the applicant and Board address the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document before the Board issues a decision on the preliminary/final plat submission. Respectfully submitted, Paul Conner, AICP, Director of Planning & Zoning Copy to: David Marshall, Project Engineer 14 \ I 7HEDOEVE SITE ENGINEER: -/EXISTING YD INV-385.7'EXISTAJG2D'SANITARY rLLC & SEWER EASEMENT IN IOUR \� � ,IFAVOR OF THE CITY3S2 EXISTING CONTOUR =ANT LLC - / / of SOUTH aunuNCTDN ST— / APPROXIMATE ISTING TPROPERTY LINE /-- --- / 1 / / Q / - . _ . _ . _ SETBACK LINE CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. I 1 L �_ 42.3' -� J/� - - �r - - - -------------------- EASEMENT ONE laoaseaseaa PAX soaRe/aN .wHt 7 1 / ^/� SEWER ONE coexv xr C) - Au. mcR>'s sassRv® on — G — — GAS ONE DRARx \ ///I I \ I I =I \ \ \ ♦ \ ■��\♦� / / // ♦ I /I — ON on —W — — WATER ONE MJW II / 060001J�/�3) � r\r \ � I ■ ■ ■ ■ �■ ■�■ ■ _\ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ rn � I I // CURB // ■ / / ( / -- OF UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC (I 1 o I■■■■■■■r■ \ 1 / 7 M r I / / ■/ I / DSM —ST — — STORM DRAINAGE ONE I r - i ri► I I /� TT ' }� APPROVED I I I I 11 2d DEI I ♦./ I I I I / / / // / / ■ I / G SEWER MANHOLE DSM i I \ I I `flfl �ONE�SEM�NF J I I I / / / ■ �I I SHUT-OFF G-- I I RFACE EMPLOYE BREAK T / 1 / 1 / ■ l OWNER: AREA J I r/ ■ I HYDRANT —S NEW6RIAMINOUS I / ■ / I ^�/ ® CATCH BASIN 55 — —�— I 1 i a --- 1 / / / ® / I LoroG, ■ 1 LOT I I lCRETE � ■ / /I ® YARD DRAIN F�}�pCRo.L1� / / J / I I / / // �ykBl ■ I / SPHINX 1 II I I� _ W J / ' / // / I _ i I o. o POLE MOUNTED LIGHT DEVELOPMENT, LLC I I I ■ \ BOLLARD LIGHT k I I 1 d I I I I I / I /■ ae G BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT 391 HILLS POINT RD. II I 1 / I I' \ 11 / / / / 1 ct ■ I I r CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 _ L / PAOPO.._O \ E ISTING SMH I Y� } / �� / I I ' l / / 1 DETENn N S R�NN=408.0' 1 I I'-__ .-_ -- T"�---" X \ \ I / INy=401.1' I I I / w FWIDIC�P RAMPS / / / ,� POND_ / ■ / LEVELI RIM=TING 385. SMH I JIFBURLINGTON PROPERTIES 378 B ,/ / / I! ■ R INV- LIMITED PARTNERSHIP \ PROJECT: ; . �. _ J/ / i / / / / / / / // / OWNER OF RECORD & APPLICANT P I /,// / //' / / /i GAMAL ELTABBAKH PROPOSED \1 fry' ` - - I - m �' �' VANACCEySIBLE / ■ I 391 HILLSPOINT RD. / , / RPARpNG --� --m= fi— PLANNED \ I �f' � lu � - �� -/ - / / ausNcuRe � \ CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 /// /// it I/ 004 EM /// / nBEVEAu ° ♦♦1� NI ZONING DISTRICT. UNIT I I 411 / / •' ! % i / / ( ti r►♦ I DEVELOPMENT YI // \\ : X I 11\ INDUSTRIAL -OPEN SPACE 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & I II /' / ' / I / / 'CONCRETE \ `eF, 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD kALn & \ I I DIMENSIONAL SUMMARY SO. BURLINGTON, VT O5403 o f1 I \ 3 \ \\ 1 \\ \ \\ \ - I \` ENSW PROPOSED REOD. CONaraNs CONDITIONS I \ I I I I I 1 \ \ I ',. (sg E ^I�\ \\ \ \ I \ \ A I LOT AREA 3 AC 3.64 AC 3.64 AC B ILDDD�NG I \ ` \ FRONT SETBACK SO 43 5T \\ O I 1 I \ J \ F. E.:_ig1]_t 5 II 11 K,A� \ 1 \\ 1 I I SIDE SETBACK 35' 33 82' - -- y ■y \\ m I ILL I V� \ \ \ \ I I \ ® REAR SETBACK 50 340' 263 I is I I / I I I 1 I \\ ? i I\I Q \ \ / l I \ FL CURB \ I I -� I \ I GE 50% 3.5% 9.5% :' 1 1 I I I 11 I\\ \ / // / I UNgER CANOPY LOT COVERAGE 50% 7.6% 49.5% ne i fY —.. RiONI YMD COVERAGE 30% 23.0% 9.8% 20N6�ElIE I ■ *PARKING LOT 10% NIA 10.6% J .. . GREEN SPACE - 1 I■ PROPOSET� 1 � VSROUSE 118 l I 1 \ I ; // I *PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE CALCULATION. x+ti*D D w I I 1 / l / 2 LIGHT IT FLUSH CURB __. I // ■ I MAIN PARKING LOT TOTAL AREA = 63,400 sf _ WIDENING / / I i '/ / � I 'F1• REYEALJ - - - - _ - I / ■ GREEN SPACE IN MAIN PARKING AREA = 6,667 sf - LONG TRANSITION r ■ I 6,657 = 63,400 = 10.5% I I - CURB /;■IMPERVIOUS 1■ : I I I I HANOMAPP KING I / / I ■ BUILDING AREA LOCATION MAP / I I I I _ sroNnYP. F 3) 1 'T-- / I I ■ ( BUILDING AREA = 1$491 sf ■ � PAVEMENT AREA 61,484 sf I" = 2o0a — T SIDEWALK, PADS, ETC. AREA = 3,095 sf 1 PGRASS w NO I I 1 4s CONCREAE ` 1 I I I■ I I / PARKING SUMMARY DA[6 cxx savls<oR ffi I r- 7 I I I I I e WALK & CONP. 1 \ I / I/ �I I 1 I OPAICAEIE I I I CURB 8-28-11 DSM REVISED PER ORB COMMENTS I i�1 111/ j 1 I 1 I I \ fl & CONC�I ETE i i I 11 \ \\ \ I / / / GROSS BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 40,261 sf SSI 1 �I 11 '1 wALK ® I 50% MEDICAL OFFICE = 40,261 +2 = 20,131 / \ T I 1 1 1 1 \ I 20,131 x 5 SPACES PER 1000 = 101 SPACES REOD. INV- - - _, �-1I'. 1 4D3.1'G / Ot. 15 f , .1 I \ /�1 �I 50% GENERAL OFFICE = 40,261 +2 = 20,131 21FR; MEE WCH. I a II 11 11 SHOTTwwsmav 11 // � I �I - -57- I i JJOCURB ! I 20, 131 5 SPACES PER 1000 = 71 SPACES REOD. qLA I �' / TOTAL LREQUIRED = 172 O I 1 _( � \\ T r-11,-'i / / I I o-a I +a / 2ryw1De 1 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDEQ' 46i"IVE&JJFQUESTED ACCESS D ■ CI PROJECT FOR 8 SPACES) PAo%-' PROPOSE LYx,B , °""�' I BENCHMARK SITE , I - 1 \ I I I MANHOLE MAR 2 8 2011 /jA}j- . j . 1 POLE LK3Flf� S FENCE GRAS$WALKINO \yam RIM-386.1Y I / \ EXISTING 15' BIKE PROPOSED , ,�' , , \ , / , FOR . PATHS I \ , I EXISTING SMH IMPROVEMENTS i CURB l I I I PATH EASEMENT IN VT TRAFFIC 118 / I RIM=3&5.B' ,QF LAN THAFFK: I I '� \ INV57BB _ _ �'i'v' //�� MARKINGS I I / \ I ___'____ _______ _ ___ __ ___ ______L______ _____________ ___ ______� _________ _ ___ * l� ______ �I 1 I --- + / 1 ♦♦ / �> / - ---------- Q I\ I _ _ _ ■■■ ■■■ r S■■I■■■■■*■■■■�■■■■■�■■■■ I I E%. N' SDR 35 PVC / ♦ - / —SS— 1 I / I I ��■■■■�■ ■ ■■■�■■■■■ ■S■■■■■ ■■■■■■■*■1��— -- —� J I DRAIRNG NIIMRER 1 MUNSON FEB., 2011 fj,­-_GRAPHIC SCALE s�•,= v I I o EARTHMOVING EXISTING ,MH \ I 1 / / EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC C 1 RIM=405.1' , EXIST] SM ss EXISTING 2V SANITARY CORPORATION 1" = 20' INV=3B8.7'EMENTIN / FA OFSEWER THECITY \ / RIM= 3.2' esa. NO. S I / INV- II I �h FM )K OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 10169 D D A a 4 / ^f 1 WEST ELEVATION SCALE, yr-r-v NORTH ELEVATION SCALE, I/r-P—O' SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE, 1/0--r—O' SE�AST ELEVATION SCALEa yr-r-o• t 2 • 4 0 • i\ JOB NUMBER: D DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 0 NEAGI.,FY $ CHASF CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1150 Airport Drive PO Box 2283 So- Burlington, Vr 0540Y-"-83 (802) a%W20 8580349 Fax 1060 HDMBURG ROAD SOUTHBURUNGTON, VT SPHINX DEVELOPMHNT D U J o_ ~ M M LU N N 2 CID 0 q E U L LL ; a _ 7 LL A D cd � in m�o� ► - o rR � E . o r- a J W I W F Z W F- V) i W Q � I ECEIVE( DRAWING TI I I,F: MAR 2 8 2011 A 6.E ATM 'Of So. Buriington""TE'- "'0 mo C1V1! E11r111EE;R11Ir AISO IS,JC.IAf 11 IC�. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 March 29, 2011 Mr. Paul Conner, City Planner City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Sphinx Development, LLC Office Building 1060 and 1090 Hinesburg Road PUD Preliminary & Final Plan Application Dear Mr. Conner: Phone: 802-864-2323 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Based upon the staff comments received in support of the March 15, 2011 hearing and supplemental recommendations from the Development Review Board, we have revised the application plans and have summarized those modifications below. Landscaping Revisions not included in original comments from City Arborist 1. The originally proposed tree locations have been revised to reflect the inclusion of the proposed recreation path. 2. The pedestrian entry way on west side of building has been accentuated with additional landscaping material.. 3. Modify tree species on West side to recommended Chanticlear (see Fire Chief comments). 4. The proposed screening of the transformer and cooling tower has been refined. 5. Shade tress have been added at employee break area on north side of building. 6. Review possibilities of reducing screening on west side of the building to promote the interaction of the street and the building. The landscaping plan has been revised to relocate one of the oaks that was on the west side of the building to be near the employee break area. The plan now shows the clustering of three Amelanchier around the west entry walk to accentuate the entry. It should be noted that the Amelanchier is not a big tree- it will probably only get 10' wide at maturity, 20'-25' tall. We kept the one oak tree along the road as a backup for the other street trees, which won't live forever. 7. Update landscaping schedule and values Civil Plan Revisions not originally requested in previous Staff Comments 8. Relocated bike rack to the west side of building Mr. Paul Conner Page 2 of 4 March 29, 2011 9. Prepared final grading and details for recreation path 10. Added walking path connection from the staff break area on north side of the building tot eh perimeter walking path. 11. Revised pavement markings at driveway to reflect the new recreation path crossing. 12. Remove flag pole lighting references. 13. Widen sidewalk on west side of building to the recreation path to 6-feet. Building Revisions 14. Provide accentuated entry on west side of the building (under separate cover to be submitted by March 29th). 15. N&C to fine tune research on cooling tower size and color. Fire Chief Comments 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Division of Fire Safety codes and standards. Acknowledged 2. Automatic sprinklers and fire alarm system. Acknowledged 3. Fire Department Sprinkler Connection locations to be specified by SBFD. Applicant will coordinate with SBFD on the exact locations. 4. Fire Alarm System panels and enunciator location to be specified by SBFD. Applicant will coordinate with SBFD on the exact locations. 5. Provide emergency key box(s) for the building, location to be specified by SBFD. Applicant will coordinate with SBFD on the exact locations. 6. Elevator car(s) to be sized large enough to accommodate an ambulance stretcher in the flat position. Acknowledged. This has been included in the design of the building. 7. Provide at least 1 additional fire hydrant for the project. I would recommend it be located on the North West side of the building in the corner of the parking lot. This is now depicted on Sheet C3 on the northwest corner of the parking lot. 8. Provide 24 hour per day off -site (central station) monitoring of all fire alarm and fire protection systems. Acknowledged. 9. Per the plan dated February 2011, the overhang (portico) adjacent to the front entrance should be a minimum of 12'6" clear passage height. Acknowledged. 10. Trees, fences and floral outcroppings should be placed so as not to interfere with the deployment of the aerial ladder, hoselines, portable ladders and other firefighting equipment. The landscaping plan has been revised to change out the tree species on the east side of the building to utilize the "Chanticleer" pear tree species which is more columnar and has a lower mature height. Mr. Paul Conner Page 3 of 4 March 29, 2011 Public Works Comments: Stormwater Comments 1. Projects needs a State Stormwater Permit. Acknowledged. An application was submitted on January 31, 2011. 2. Hydrologic Modeling received and accepted. 3. Questions about Stormwater Runoff from expanded VT 116 (Hinesburg Road). The existing conditions currently collect runoff from the west side of VT Rt 116 in a ditch and discharges the flows in a concentrated manner at the southwest corner of the project property. These flows follow the contour and drain onto the Vermont Eye Laser property to the south. These flows are intercepted in the VT Eye Laser stormwater collection system and are discharged in the existing stormwater pond. The proposed project will relocate the discharge point to a point further east and closer to the VT Eye Laser stormwater basin thereby reducing the impacts of the flows on the upper portions of the VT eye Laser property. Flows from the VT Eye Laser stormwater system overflow onto the Munson Earthmoving property to the east. These flows are then intercepted by a collection and conveyance system constructed by Civil Engineering Associates. These flows are then sent to Detention Basin #1 and then Detention Basin #2 of the Meadowland Business Park. These basin were sized to accommodate 50% lot coverage. The unused impervious area on the CEA property alone represents 12,000 SF of available impervious area. The increase in impervious area for the road widening is 4,000 SF. 4. Must maintain stormwater system in good working order condition. Acceptable. 5. As -Built Plan submittal Condition. Acceptable. Landscaping Comments 6. Use of continuous plating pits. These have been called out on the L-1 Landscaping Plan. 7. Change out Red Maples for Freeman Maples. This has been implemented in the revised Landscaping Plan Sheet L-1. 8. Locations of the tree protections zones added to plans. This has been implemented in the revised Landscaping Plan Sheet L-1. 9. Sizes of the tree protection zones were outlined. We have integrated as much of the recommendations into the plan as possible with the understanding that the attempts to retain certain trees in proximity to the proposed building and the recently added recreation path will require some form of encroachment within the preferred setback distances. 10. Review and approval of landscaping budget and credit.. No issue. Mr. Paul Conner Page 4 of 4 March 29, 2011 Water Comments 11. Page C-3. A. Use 12x8 tapping tee. So revised. B. Use 8x6 Tee and 6" valve for hydrant. So revised. C. Service to building can be reduced to 6" with valve. Applicant has chosen to retain 8" service into the building. 12. Page C-4 A. Remove existing curb boxes, shut off at corporation stop and disconnect service line. So revised. 13. Page C-7 A. Tapping Sleeve callout modification. So revised. B. Attach hydrant value to hydrant tee. So revised. C. Add Latest Version to spec reference. So revised. 14. Page C-10.2 A. No air testing of tapping sleeves. So revised. B. Need stainless steel service rods. So revised. C. Ned to add reference to latest CWD specs and details. So revised. D. Polywrap all DI Pipe and fittings. So revised. 15. Page C-10.3 A. Waterous hydrant to be installed with "Boston Operating Nut".So revised. B. Add hydrant flag to hydrants. So revised. Traffic Comments 16. Traffic report acceptable. Acknowledged. General Comments 17. Rec path construction or pavement in lieu of construction. Rec path construction and typical detail added to Sheets C2 and C-8. 18. Earlier comments from Sketch Plan addressed. Acknowledged. This completes our summary of the revisions that have been integrated into the updated design plans. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 864- 2323 x310. Respec avid S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer Enclosures: 10 Sets of 11 x17 plans 5 Sets of full size plans (2 distributed to Public Works) cc: T. Chase (w/ enclosures) CEA File 10169.00 (w/enclosures) PAMWCADD Projects\2010\ 10169\Permitting\ 1-Local Applications\3-Final\Conner Cover2.wpdx s / rr n // ~d ' \, d ld - a i' x J � s I I, a Y .,e C f , v _ • _ : I I w 4 t. `K < I : I t I I I � p' J ., h .., ....:. _ ... -=:gym`"'•_ -- -- -- - -�. - R--�-- -- -- -- - - -_ _- ----� GRAPHIC SCALE /' ! I'F � I y • ?' ep 0 tl A IW .lal '. � .-.. h -�• . I ( m rasa) I r y m 80 ft GENERAL NOTES 1. If a discrepancy exists in plant quantities between the planting plan and plant let. Contractor a to notify the Landscape Architect immediately. 2. All shrubs and trees will be sprayed with the anti -desiccant will -Prue ( or approved equal) prior to the Bret Winter. 3. The Contractor shall locate all underground utilities in areas to be landscaped prior to commencing any excavation. Adjustments to tree locations will be allowed where utility "'Hits are clearly a problem and with prior site approval by Landscape Architect, Architect. 4. All plant bed, shrub and tree locations shall be staked In the BeM by Contractor for Landscape Architects approval prior to installation. 5. Adjustments to plant beds shall be approved by Landscape Architect. 6. The Contractor is responsible for all erosion coned meaaures during construction. 7. All disturbed areas are to be speoilad and seeded. 8. Mulch shall consist of double -shredded hardwood mulch or approved equal. Contractor is responsible for providing samples of mulch to Landscape Architect. Mulch plant materials as shown on pen and defogs, 9. t is the Intent of this contract to avold any disturbance to existing trees or shrubs on site other than those specifically designated for transplant or removal. 10. Contractor Is responsible for all damage due to his opemtiona inside and outside the contract limit line. 11. Contractor is responsible for checking spot elevations and verifying proposed grades try providing grade stakes. C—dea must be approved by Engineer or Landscape Architect prior to proceeding. 12. Contractor shall blend new work smoothly with existing grades at contract limit line and/or limit of construction line. Potential Snow Storage Areas (ryp.) 3 An ,Ce ra Storage Areas (typ.) Existing Vegetation to be Protected RVDp ) 1 PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY I OTY I SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION COMMENTS DECIDUOUS TREES AL B 1 Amsianchler sauce Shadbkmr 8'-10' H. BIB M.lestem (3 tc 5) ALE 5 Amesrwhler save Simdbivw 212'-7 Cat BIB eIn,Wsem AR 14 Ace, rudum'AUWrm Spire' Red Maple 212--3'Cal . BIB ARR t AwrmWnTbs 9uneC Red Maple 4"I 1fT Cal. BIB PC 11 "oaleryana'— nn BIaY Calbry Pear 2 12' - 3' CaL B t B OB 2 Ouemus bkokr Swamp Oak 3' .3 1? Cal. B I B OBI 1 4 Ouemus bkxeor Swamp Oak 2 12' - 3- Cal. B * B SHRUBS CS 26 Comua seH—'A,.k Fire' Compact Red Twig Dogwood 3 gal. Cont- B/R NJ 9 lax venicllas'Jim Dandy M.I. Wlnbrbery 3gal. Cont- BIR IV 69 it.. verticlgas'Red Sprite' Dwell Wlnmerry 3 gM. C—T. BIR FG 14 Fothergllla gardenll'Mt. Airy' Dwarf Fotherg9a 3gal. Cont or B/R RA 40 Rhus ammetics'Gro-LoW Fragrant Bumee 3gal. Cont.or B/R RV 3 RhodadeMmn Nermum Swamp Axeba ,gel. Cantor BR GROUNDCOVERS• FERNS AB 30 yyuBs'Bmnxe Beauty Bugbweea 4-- PERENNIALSHP 1 N HemerocaMb'Ed Murrey Ed Murray Deygly 1 gel. Corm, BUR NF 14 Nepafe/ berii'3ix Hills Giant Catmint 1gal. Cantor B/R ORNAMENTAL GRASSES MS 46 Ml—ntI%a.manes—purpuroecena I Purple Misanlhus 1gal. Container STORM WATER POND PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY I OTY I SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION SHRUBS CO 6 Cephabnlhue—d-lege Butsnbush 3gal. CoAEVR CS B Cornus sences Red Tw19 Dogwood 30. CoPO 9 PMsawrpua opuklallus Nlnebak 3 9a Co RAIN GARDEN PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY OTY SCIENTIFICNAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION I COMMENTS TREES AC 1 Amshmchbr censdenels PH— Diane- Shadblow V-10 H I B + B single sam PERENNVLLS AT 19 Ascleplas Wbemsa Buaerllyweed 1 go. Container CIE 31 C.--Evergold Japanese Sedge 4• pps Contains, EP 14 Echlnacea purpuree'Ruby Star Purple Conermer 1 tie. Conine, IVE 18 Ire varakolor Blue Flag as 1gaL Container OR 11 Oamunda regale Royal Fem 1 gel. Conine, Nola. 1. Native gross meadow seed mix to ba'Eaelem Ecotype Native Gress Mlx' pmvksd by Emet Comervatkn Seeds; 9006 Mercer Pike, Meadville PA 16336, (B00) 87&3321 LEGEND Native a I --seed and (hydroaeersedbd) .< seeded Lawn (hy hosseded) a Ever Tree toam Raln Wee eting "prgreen Ireprotection Existing Dsolduous Tma s Remain (see tree pmtaction detail) OProposed Deciduous Tree MAGNETIC GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 ( IN FEET) 1 inch =30ft. JOB NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CZ 0 G a m OC W 0 LLI •V X Z m L 'aa '0 vJ U) to z 0 U) w DRAWING TITLE: PLANTING PLAN 1/31/11 DRAWING NO. L-1 Mature deciduous trees contribute to screening Mature evergreen trees contribute to screening � f i , 1 #29 Maple' �1 :f307 Cooling tower approx.:6'xg'X15' ta14 on 8" -12".� •high boncrete.slab: Base oftower:at epprox. #3b ror y t el8v. 402• (4'• lower than ele�rdtion at. Rt. 116)..%. O o Transformer ontconcrete pad (4) White Spruce, 10'-12' high c� 1 I Height after 3-5 yrs: 13'-16' o l— - Mature height: approx. 40' 0 1 . (1)1Vhite Spruce, 10'-12' high 0 1 t r #31 Pine 1 Screening Concept: By setting the cooling tower approximately 4' below the grade at Rt. 116, the apparent height of the tower is lessened. The tower will be painted either brick color to match the building or dark green to blend with the evergreen trees. A naturalistic planting of 10'-12' tall native evergreen trees provides immediate screening of the tower and transformer, and the screening effect will increase as the trees mature. Existing evergreen trees along the southern property line and a couple deciduous trees, one of which is very large, west of the cooling tower provide further screening. Placement of the proposed trees is based on anticipated view angles when travelling on Rt. 116 from both directions and when entering the site. The intent of the planting is not to create a continuous 'green wall' or hedge around the tower, which would draw more attention to it, but to provide landscaping that appears natural and drastically reduces the visual presence of the tower. 30 0 15 30 SCALE: 1" = 30' UtilityScreening Plan SPHINX DEVELOPMENT 3.15.11 g South Burlington, Vermont Prepared by LandWorks D a A ME 000No nl \ WEST ELEVATION 1 SCALE: I/B•-I'-O' FIT —1 NORTH • • o n t ST ELEVATION Al. Ve•-1'-O' I = a t t JOB NUMBER: D DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: I* NEAGLEY & CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1150 Airport Ddw PO Box 2283 Bo. Burlington, Vi 05407-2283 (602) 65"320 65"349 Fax 1060 HRMBURG ROAD SOUTH BURUNOTON, VT SPHINX DEVELOPMENT e U J A n U oc� F S n 2 o co U N a €a8QE al x (i D D > Q a] ® y COLL E } 6) C 0 IT ib ! 'E Ir DRAWNG TITLE: RENDERED ELEVATION A ��ATE: 111OW010 DrRAWING NO. RI NORTH • • o n t ST ELEVATION Al. Ve•-1'-O' I = a t t JOB NUMBER: D DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: I* NEAGLEY & CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1150 Airport Ddw PO Box 2283 Bo. Burlington, Vi 05407-2283 (602) 65"320 65"349 Fax 1060 HRMBURG ROAD SOUTH BURUNOTON, VT SPHINX DEVELOPMENT e U J A n U oc� F S n 2 o co U N a €a8QE al x (i D D > Q a] ® y COLL E } 6) C 0 IT ib ! 'E Ir DRAWNG TITLE: RENDERED ELEVATION A ��ATE: 111OW010 DrRAWING NO. RI 4 MAXIMUM BLDG HEIGHT 435.2 „o JOB NUMBER: p 430 • 42s DRAWN BY: --- 20 4is CHECKED BY: _ 4io NEAGLEY & CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1150 Airport Dn" PO Box 2283 So. Burlington, VT 05407-2283 PROPOSED BIKE PATH _ROUTE 114 (302)85820 BW-030ftc !EXISTING GRADE R.O.W. EXTENSION RIGHT-OF-WAY 83ESIGN GRADE 1060 HBUMURG ROAD SOUTH BURUNGTON, VT ��� EAST - WEST SITE SECTION THROUGH CENTER OF BUILDING SCALE: I / I G"=1' -O" SPHINX DEVELOPMIId'T 0 0 U J D. r ~ c� c� 440 LL N MAXIMUM BLDG. HEIGHT 435.2 _ _-___ 43].08� = 0 W _ _ _ 435.1 S 436 aD E 430 LL > -- FUTURE PEDESTRIAN PATH 0 a c LL I --- 422.5$ 3� F • ' .-PROPOSED BIKE PATH R.O.W. EXTENSION 420 m P T `Rii1LI1F_ IIG 0 Rm o - ,I6 RIGHTOf-WAY_ F- w cR E 41-•- • _ I Ijl�l ail, SOUTH DRAWING TITLE: A A SITE SECTION �,�� EAST - WEST SITE SECTION DETAIL THROUGH CENTER OF BUILDING SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" DATE: 11105/10 FAST WEEST DRAWING NO. ss l NORTH 1 : . 4 _ �O � o a o +.o • o c.o i.o e.o �.o I j j j I I DI o I I j I j T uA1Y"C� I JOB NUMBER: —I G j j I j I I I DRAWN BY: pm- - — CHECKED BY: j7- j j g j NEAGLEY & CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Fv PO Box 1283 �I_ _ _ (802)t66"320 655-034 Fuc _ _ _ rnaeueM li + 1060 HINFSBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT j SPVDNX DEVELOPMENT 1�r _ u�a�c77Fnnn"' TFtNrrr IL •�CIUI•dV. � � =--cc-il •EOwWICN. IaPeNw•sow I �_ —_--- _" Ua co ---- ---- --- --- LL N = j NEf U•YlE e,eN eF OnoI NEf UMt1i. 6,700 eF ( V j Q EoD E j D >LL " E o Q��a I I E CST 15, GROSS MEASURED AREA: 12,810 SF SHAM: 804 SF FLOOR RENTA131LE AREA: 12,006 SF FLOOR OOTv11(MON AREA: $57 SF I I FLOOR USA13LE AREA: 11,449 SF i DRAWING TITLE: A SECOND FLOOR PLAN A SECOND FLOOR PLAN GROSS BUILDING AREA: 13,385 SF DATE 11AW10 DRAWING NO. 2 a 4 e • I / I II I 9TTS ENGINEER: Exlsnwc ro LEGEND I 1 1 4RIM-389.6' I I INV-3e5.7' EXISTNG 20' SANITARY SPANIEL PROPERTIES LLC & K SEWER EASEMENT IN I I 392 EXISTING CONiWR W�I J FAVOR OF THE CITY AVALANCHE DEVELOPMENT LLC - / OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ST! � lk12'� PROPOSED CONTOUR APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC _ _ _ SETBACK ID u, 3' MVdffIDVFWLAME SWM&RMTON VFOW �� ------------------- T_ L - �rs�euaenczszs rAc eozaesml ..o:..»•.w..f.00„ � -_ /, EASEMENT UNE _SS- - GRAVITY SEWER LINE �■.■ ■■■■ ■ ����■■■■■ �■ I I -G - - GAS LINE oRAnNe - W - - WATER UNE M J W II I I I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ n ■ ■`■ o� ■ �■ I ■ E ■ N ■ ■ n ■ ■ •a ' /// • 1 POND _ - UE - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CHEMD * STRUC E I DSM - - / / I -ST - - STORM DRAINAGE LINE r F� , � i IiW-382 / APPROVED ® SEWER MANHOLE II � � / , I I I / ; / ,■I � , DSM I I \ II I I I / I / I ' / ' / I / �■ I / ® SHUT-OFF VI G --G_ I , I I / I / /■� / OWNER: F I INV a / ;■ Tn� / HYDRANT - I I 1 I I / / seas ' I ■; q a ro Ss J II + 1n '1 I / / / ,/ i I , ■I a q ® CATCH BASIN i, / , / / , /' ® - \ YARD DRAIN rD t4 SPHINX POLE MOUNTED INv= o I I / p BOLLARD ucHT DEVELOPMENT, LLC I I I I l aI�1 39a5 I j / / ' sPF v BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT 391 HILLS POINT RD. CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 �LtwL EXISTING SMH SPREADER I I I I ,. } ,x / ' i ( / ' / _.._- I I RM-4ono' � I I I I I 9---- --- ----- � ��--� - __ ' _. \ , � ' / / / / 1 � I I ■� a CJ3 tz' EXISTING SMH e{rj / / Rth390.6 i ' ■ 1 I mM-3B5.9' 1 INV-378.9' YD / / / / - - IN-387.0 1• I ■ \ PROJECT: �Ry3 1a` / / ' evvour=388 / � ■ BURLINGTON PROPERTIES J/ t -a91. � / � rsHOPE T Ta•tJOFE / S � I ;■, � � LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ' ° r E -- S. I ;■ ; IR PROPOSED I■1 \ °IY I \e" - --' I /�,/� i/ /mil Tom_/ / / / ' / / ' � ' // l i z 1■; I PLANNED NV,N_388.6 UNIT eX18PRECA57 DEVELOPMENT SEDIMENT TANK RIM-3%.0 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & INVIN=385.e 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD / / / / \ ■ INV OUT=385.4 ( I / I ' �� ■ ( \ SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 5 CU t3 ■ I \ \ I \ \ T \ 1 I \ \\ \ \ \ \ RIM= ■I I �� \ INV IN= .0 ■ OB�rRMMOTEs: \ - I I I \\ OPISE44.1 --- INvour= .T I O I I IT B IL� NG \ Ai LOCATE 6NOWN00NOCENT707W$EPV nmPF&MraEMMU)IL" \ h I "j z RAG I ` \._ �� ■ taaTmLNcwa+Aawc,ENrrolHesLmErrnFRew'ESEmnwournnr t/�J I >• F. E. 3 -5 POLE LaarXXaAREAroRrn>waTE aar. THE CCNrrucTorrslw/.Nao wTfrAu I I \ \\ 1 I \ 1 6 UraRYOOM CTS ALL DISCREPAHMS9MU BERFravrrDTOMINoINEEa MeoarnwCrW&w CONrAL7ausrrEleee34-,z,3irR 70MYC srRUO" F- I 2 nFOONrVL-rOR N,ILREpAMSTOWALLDSnFMDARE4SIONwWTIE 1\ I I \ I \ \ e"1C5'ML1NE NADAPTER \ I I , \\ ■ I s'nE7ASAUMECTORMOnECTWSLET FTEC�7RrCDOv. CC I 1 \\ \ IWIiT; B' ED O/�ME / I I I I I 1 c - - _• �� \ Ifr/Mm39p.5�- 0 I I / / f I I-- - 1 1 ALL tlNSSEOAREAS 9MlL BEAWYiNNED UNR R.LL 1f0EfATpI b'ESTA&1S'E0. I 4. MAWAINRln*Esalr"CFCO6nWrONOvrs }�YID �,Pe -a I 5 I t4 / I I f HOPE I I Q ■ ( n ,w O FACOMIRACrOR�saurunE aCAGIU PROPOOSEOALL �UnuLTIEESWWWIBE iDERGROU0. PROPOSEb I I �B COMPLEV . l e r 1 / 1 I "� RI =3d3.7 , Sf \ ■ n I II \ I I(MAOOrrEMEC S VTROU1E7fe TON17MCIALLCOILETETHEWfWACCOGANCAUPSN7D6WO tV COMMfRAhMW7WaOFSOMeUALING,aPUBLIC WOW STAa)49Ds / ---- l ' 7. RTOIER "FORK BMW FORAUPAtiMK..WuxWArsNouWN 5 cRts RIM=390.e / / , ■ ( a THIS l3NOTA9OMOA"SURVEvunISAW#REMIED70BEUSED ASONE INVIN=387.0 / , I■ uwOUI=38ae / I■ I n SPE �TXNa•THECWR4cr�Lw RAU �aAcTTNEEN+IEERFORVVIOrAOv I. w - I I 1 -I 1 I I 1 / I I ■a eErarxaroccorrrMUEscWiNEneuMoua7loN. gI I OI1 rowea D I J I 1 -- 1 1 I I j I■ rgIw TSC*fEW TERs�AREw.w WT APAPPLrrwvT�A�ssuW�u DAn CM. uv�oB TD" I INV-9aS0 f I C=fORNYWTATMAYBEDOMEMECIESSNR: I bl RIM-403.01 ' - \ \\ I // tw-ms l I V / - - /5%MAX ' SS SLOPE / ST / : R/M=3e05 -- �� 'El / swALE I I I 1cT �4 ce ` ,' - / 11 /' I � s e tsA ' ` BNCHAAWK SITE RI 406.6 G -�` - tom. / I �- I - - L ...T ... MANHOLE -1 M=390.9 I RIM-385.Y GRADING AND Cy N=401 I _ � / / %� � / � 4 CH fe I r INV=3B7.8 \��, " �`. /I 1. _/ / RIM 5 I \\ EXISTING PATH EASEMENT5'BIKE EIN PROPOSED / .I' \ / / / I I EXISTING SMH VTROUTE 11a �,� `� / l / INV 5 I 1 Rl es.9' / *.� FAVOR OF THE CITY TRAFFIC I I ' ` _ OF SOUTH BURUNGTON MARfQNO$ NV 79.9 - / -- � E DRAM A - - - - -I- - - - ■■■�■■ q I rroI I I I MIENS 4■2o5' s■n■ monsoon -.-- I ■■■ ■ -+-FM- - I - DAn OHAl11NG NllYB%R �1\` FEB., 2011 eS I / OMHt1 GRAPHIC SCALE % %% 1\\ 1\` I EARTHMOVING sDA� EXlsnwc SMH INV IN= 98 EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC L e 14 m e 3 OMH t2 C 2 RIM=405.1' { I/ I IEXIsn SMH 1 INVfN=388.0 RIM=3B0.5 EXISTING 20' SANITARY CORPORATION 1�= 20� INV-398.7' \ I I RIM=}''Dy3.2' INVOUT=397.9 INVIN-386.3 SEWER EASEMENT IN / INV-b9B.4' / INVOUT=388.2 FAO R OF THE CITY I PRDA. No. 1 10c11 TM10' }L OF SOUTH BURUNGTON 10169 ENGINEER TO CITY CENTER SMH kI Rkn-200.55 S S S $ $ $ BITUMINOUS ;At _ S61 00-E S r-riOWEN FENCE -- — -- —--7daj1--- — —_ — -- — I / 3' CRABAPPLE AL I a 201.75 3' 4APLE e' Sp uce I I I w $I� I J. nuke n/f STONE DIAPHRAGM BIORETEN g i f3 Legend — APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE UTILITY POLE OS SEWER MANHOLE X100.90 SPOT GRADE I • IPF IRON PIPE FOUND PBF REBAR FOUND S PROPOSED SEWER lPF — W PROPOSED WATER -� FLOW DIRECTION PAVED PARKING AREA 32 Parking Spo— f 1 1 2P112p 1 1 I_ 1.25 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM r N FACILITY 200.50 x NATURAL STREAM BUFFER (TO REMAIN) Ba`�Br��k WET AREA S. Martin n/f _VC SENER./ PIP BY OTHERS — STREAM CENTERUNE y ge�1 m P 8 ABC Savings Bank 1.40 acres i To "M�USTOO . �cNT SMH {3 I I, I / II 1 I 1 I PROPOSED DRIVE -UP 1 TELLER WALK) 1 TOP OF SLAB I EL 204.00 203.00 ED PROPO SIER PNO I Q. Barker OU n�f I II 1/ I PAVED AREA I 1 I 1 201.50 � I � 1 � I NATIVE WLDFLOWER AREA / 1 � / 1 \ \ I N66'Nb0'W 740.00' — ___--------- W Y,— _____-- ilPf I- z 0 2 cr LU Q z� F- a m CzZ Lu � F- ZJ (n Q m W U7 m~ 0a O ape a 0 U FIGURE NO. 8-1 SHEET I OF 9 UtilityScreeningPlan SPHINX DEVELOPMENT 3.15.11 South Burlington, Vermont Prepared by LandWorks No Text Page 1 of 2 Paul Conner From: Paul Conner Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 12:23 PM To: 'dmarshall@cea-vt.com'; 'Rob Higgins' Cc: Matt Wamsganz; patricko@landworksvt.com Subject: RE: Sphinx Development Recreation Path Lot Coverage Issues Hi Dave, Our approach has always been that provision of a rec path in this manner would not affect lot coverage, as if we were to build it later we would not count it. Paul Conner, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 pconner@sburl.com www.sburl.com/planriing From: Dave Marshall [mailto:dmarshall@cea-vt.com] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 12:09 PM To: 'Rob Higgins' Cc: Paul Conner; Matt Wamsganz; patricko@landworksvt.com Subject: FW: Sphinx Development Recreation Path Lot Coverage Issues o Here is the information on the lot coverage issues. With a 10' rec path added to the project, we go over the 50% max lot coverage by 0.97%. If we built a 5' sidewalk (as originally requested by Public Works) we would be within the 50% lot coverage requirement. This twist perhaps provides impetus to ask the Development Review Board for 1 % waiver on the lot coverage to achieve the larger facility. We can give up to 4.68' of the frontage on Hinesburg Road to the City (for them to build a path in the future [I was hoping this number would be closer to 15-feet]) and stay within the 50% lot coverage for the project as is. This really does nothing positive. Attached is a sketch of the proposed rec path alignment. We have shared this with Land Works so that they may make adjustments on the proposed tree locations to facilitate either the client building the path now or the City building it in the future. Paul - This is an FYI on Payment in lieu of construction for the recreation path along Hinesburg Road. If the applicant feels that they can construct the path per the attached detail for less than what Public Works has asked for as the value for the payment in lieu of construction, then they may choose to do so. Justin said he would be happy if the applicant built the path instead of allowing the City to do it at some point in the future (with the use of the payment in lieu of construction). It does raise the issue of lot coverage. Please let me know your thoughts. Best David S. Marshall, P.E. 3/14/2011 Page 2 of 2 Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 P 802-864-2323 x310 F 864-2271 From: Matthew 3. Wamsganz [mailto:matt@cea-vt.com] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 11:47 AM To: Dave Marshall Subject: Sphinx Recreation Path Dave, The 10' wide recreation path shown on the attached pdf would add an additional 3082 sf of impervious area which would increase the lot coverage to 50.97%. Currently (without the Recreation Path) there is approximately 1543 sf of available impervious area to hit the 50% threshold. When you take into account the entrance and sidewalk from the building, there is approximately 330' to infill with recreation path. Therefore, 1543 / 330 = 4.68' (the max width the recreation path could be to stay within coverage limits). Let me know if you need anything else. Matt Matthew J. Wamsganz Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 P: 802-864-2323 x303 F: 802-864-2271 matt(c�cea-vt.com 3/14/2011 � C c SITE ENGINEER: - 1"1'"y i Exlsnwc YD LEGEND RIM-389.6' EASN20' SANITARY I INV-385.7' GASEMENT INSPANIEL PROPERTIES LLC & SEWER I r J FAVOR OF THE CITY 392 EXISTING CONTOUR AVALANCHE DEVELOPMENT LLC - _ / / OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ' Si. 12' HDI / I I 382 PROPOSED CONTOUR L II p I II I / // //' / .._ -... __ _. / -�ST� // / I APPROMMATE PROPERTY LINE + It , ' T� TT / r / / I CIYI! ENGINEERINa ASSOC-IATES, INC. SETBACK LINE 19MMSRELDWEWIANE, SOUMBURLWGTON, VT OM az3 ` / II � �:./ I L � � � � � �_ �_.���� � � � � , I'; ___ ___ _________ EASEMENT LINE zarw-zszs FaL emaea zzn »eb. »»w.ceo-,+c o m _ ■ ^, _ - 4~� - -SS- - GRAVITY SEWER LINE \ n ��� �_- i -c' ��<� - '/_ - ♦♦■■■ nus■a■■■��■� if - -G - -GAS LINE DMM . C ` _� II II II1 I I \ �I II III I'/ G �I� I 1� - -G_ ■`%I ,1''Iq , %■r NI ■ (I t ■1 \■// iC 1 ,"■�G�xr�I�■-■ �� ' / �:''7 -_ ■/" ■ :Nunn J=/ - / �,■r., It I - -- IN - - WATER LINE MJW POND UE-UNDERGRND ELECTRIC xFCD ■■■■STRUCDSMw ■■ ' I RIM- -ST- - STORM DRAINAGE LINE rr 7 INv=3z - o ■■■■ ■ SEWER MANHOLE DSM SHUT-OFF OWNER :- 1 AP - IN■ HYDRANT 361 SS I --I I ss ; - _SS I I I 11 1 - - / / / / // I 1 / ; ■I .3• I / ® CATCH BASIN f'1 I' INED I II N7II // I a•� YARD DRAIN 04.5 SPHINX G-O POLE MOUNTED LIGHT DEVELOPMENT , LLC8 RIM-38 YD I. IN=SPpF�3 BOLLARD LIGHT RyWAY 5T IN. IST."'c BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT 391 HILLS POINT RD. \ Rlu -=44I °8.0' III sI 1 I.IL. III II I III II�I I -` I lIII _,_/C n.FII: I ,o '• .� � .� i ,. -,i /, p �I _ I I\� '. �', / l I�'7�" `�I r / I/ / I '4� •,i. ..../.. /1 lI ll i/ l 1 //J , / / / / J /7/ /�- / / � 5/ _ RIM=3,90.�8 / I / I ��,I; �■■■■■ I III 385 9' CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 LEVEL E [STING S_ 3 SPREADER CB N2 ExlsuwG SMHa_____ 01.1' ` FN INV=378.9' PROJECT: OUT-386.9 BURLINGTON PROPERTIES HOPE 15' ND�E �t LIMITED PARTNERSHIP IyH PROPOSED 3T ...... I // , _ / - \ es2 '■ ' sr S L: 1 PLANNED UNIT It, I BXI6PRECAST DEVELOPMENT SEDIMENT TANK RIM-388.0 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & - \ \ \� ♦ I \\ INVOUT-3 5.4 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 CBN3 O ♦I \ RIM-38\ ■I I \, PROPOSED \ - I a INVOUT= - � GENERNNOTE& 1. MIMS SHOW N DO NOTPURPOFIT TO CONsnRITE OR REPRESu+TALL MRIES8fILDING2 MEYEaAiaFLDVEO LOC4PONAPPAWWTEOHECONTC"U.IELDgIFiu y \ F li. �'. •3.�$ 5 ,397 -'1 \ 1 �.. 1 , x MUN CONFLICTS ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER. 396.0 1\ \\ 1 --- I I I THE CONTRACTOR SMALL CONTACT DIG WE(ON 3047233) PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION /NECOHT TO Si MPNRIWSIOREALLDISRWBFDMEAS(OVOROFFTHE /III I - _- I �W1' A Ojyll13.AD r' a9.l, 'Au✓63j ael s �I .-._.. yfl + (1 I /1RI1 "„=3937 +/I ,. III O I A /\XII■:■■■ DA I A SIIEIASAMECFAIAOWRICuTRSUTaO.FEi. TowHrCP�OaNsEDT"u nu�1"rx,. THOMFDGRATE 3ALL GRASSFOMFSSHAU, BMANTNNED UNTIL FULL EOETAn �sONwISL.ETeS�ElAI.CBwUD SEMREG D� G - AWMAMALL TREES OUTSDEOF CONSTgUCTIONUMRS°Ey3CVnmyS 5 04 7 HOPE An OPERABLEFACILMS&mI s !NV=39BINTOEMIIIEMENISSEINTNBUMSPIOIrAI S,PROPOSED HECONiMCTORSHALLCOMPLEE THEWOgNWACCONOANCEWRHML PERMITVT ROUTE 116 NV UT.38 J WIDENING a. ouNo. I \\ I J ■ cavOrrroNsaNOTHECIrvoF$OVIH BuquNGronquelro WORNSsrAxOM05 _--__---_-_ ' / I I 7. THE TOLERI FOR FINISH GRACES FOR ALL PAVEMENT, WALKWAYS ANDLAWN AREASSHALLBEO I FEET RIM-390.6 J I /, ■ I B THIS ISNOT ABOUNOMYSUR1traNOR NOT WTENDED TO BE USED AS ONE. �b 1 INV /N-387.0 I ■ INVOUT-386.6 / & If iHfREMEANY CONFLICE ORINCONSBTEN'CIES WITH THE PLANS OR I / ■ CIFIGAT ON6 HE CONigACTOM: OR SHMLCO4TACT THE ENGINEERFOR VERIFICATION W I 1 UN FORE WORN CONTINUES ONTHEIEMIN WESMIN. 5 st „t t ■ r 1 G //.kk >,+a; 1 T_ -- I ■ 1g}NEMPUcanACKNOWLEDGES nWTFuruRE DCAMMWa THE MIER MAN M4Y C,C AIM=aooC I ..... I 1 1 I I I I IMPACTTMESCREEMEDITERMEAANDIIIHEMPLMANTSIWLASSWEAU DAre cxK. Al COS S FOR NEPMIS MATANYBECONE NECESSIFT , I I D.L Inv Ao o I I - R vo W3 33 I I I, '\ � ''� RECEIVED / - I W P 5 - -gg I I 2 E i H ST I 1 1 ` I , v ' m ' / ♦ (. �{ "I/`'a� / r ....I 1 ' / SLOPE E IS R �y r�/...� , `ff+. I I 1 /l/... /� /I/'■ ' 1 I � I \ �,A I 11 RMIM 3953' 5 ....� "'s \1 (`7) 7 27 J / ,/ I / / I . I % MAR 1 2 0I E 1l , } ( \ I_ • . U 5 GRASS I ED _ __._.__._ _ ' 1 ■PROJECT S. SWALE o / I � ■ �I . I City of So. Burlington I 4 CB 5 60 N5A tea+ BENCHMARK / G G - � , / I _ IM-39118 + RMANHOLESIT E �RI �455 I GRADING AND 1 N-401 y �, i / , % / 4 CB NB I 'INV-387.6 / - 1 / I OUT-41. �. / / l j RIMS 5 I I / I I EXSTING SMH E%ISnNG 15' BIKE PROPOSED / 1 > / , F INV OU 3�35 I 7 1 PATH EASEMENT IN VTROUTE 1/8 �/ I i / ,/ J OPE-_----- jJ I / ,20, ---- - **S MJ}709 FAVOR OF THE CITY TRAFFIC I __ _____ _ SOUTH BURLINGTO ___ T__ ______ __ ______ly MARKINGS -- -- - ------ - --------- ---- -- ------ -- GE - •°` DRAINAGE ql �.■■ ■■.■■I�■■■■■■■�■■.■ ■■■ , _ _ _ _ S PLAN NVO J -386.0 �- 1\ Y ryl'� 1jr Y'+.1 "`•J,, I VI ,,`�-I'T'7�Cf 425'A. FEB 2011 GRAPHIC SCALE MUNSON R�ALe �L \ I / RIM=4oa.o - s n\ ?'1 \ "' %. EA RTHMOVING j EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC 3 DMHN2^j y\ /j�, %', - 1"=20' EXlsnwc SMH \ I`. I I �I 1 INVIN=398.0 '�' LL CORPORATION RIM-405.1' 7EXISTI SMH / "' INV OUT=3B7.9 IRNVIN=3883 SEWER EASEMENTI TRY '� ` RIM= "}2' vx0l. No. wv.b9a2 / ( IN ree'r) WV OUT-35.2 FA OF THE CITY I Hwe - zo tt of SOUTH BuquwcraN 10169 ,,—IN m 3 (OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS) CE COIBZSE\ E COURSE - SS TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS 3' MIN 6' MAX. PROPOSED SIGNAGE 6. SEE NOTE j_5,6 SEE NOTE A ALTERNATE CURTIAN DRAIN DETAIL 4' ? FILTER FABRIC WASHED 2' MINUS STONE O — �� 4, '!IN. PERT. PIPE SEE NOTE 3 6 SEE NOTE I , � 2 I 2z 1 i —2' TYPE !V VAOT BIT. CONC j 12' MIN. VAOT FINE GRADED Il CRUSHED GRAVEL (SEE NOTE a) I MIRAFT 50OX OR APPROVED EQUAL RECREATION PATH TYPICAL DETAIL NOTES I. THE 10' WIDTH CAN BE REDUCED TO S' IF A BICYCLE TRAFFIC IS &P£CTED TO BE LOW VOLUP{ B. ONLY OCCASIONAL PEDESTRIAN USE IS EXPECTED C. THERE 1S GOOD HC'RIZONTAL AND V-RT!CAL ALIGRHENT D THE PATH WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO MAINTENANCE VEHICLE LOADING 2. WHEN THE 6' WIDTH TO A4 OVERSTEEP SLOPE OR DANC{R6JS CONDITION CAN NOT BE PROVIDED, THEN A SAFTEY RAIt HAY BE REQUIRED 3. A 10' CLEARANCE NAY BE REQLnRED FOR TUNNELS AND UNDERCROSSINGS <. OBSTRUCTIONS INCLUDE TREES, POLES, WALLS, FENCES, GUARD RAILS OR OTHER LATERAL OBSTRUCTION$ 5. WHERE SPACE IS LIMITED. A CURTAIN DRAIN CAN BE INSTALLED IN LIEU OF THE TYPICAL SWALE. 6. INSTALL APPROPRIATE EPSC MEASURES FOR SWALE STABILIZATION. BIKE PATH SECTION NTS DOWN SLOPE /— STEEPER / 2CHOR) TO I(VERT) RECEIVED MA _ I ..yet City of So. Burlington March 10, 2011 W, L- CIVIL EANG11"Irr'01"NIG IN I r A 10,"dansfield View Lane Phone: 802.864-2323 Smith Burlington, VT Oi4O3 Fax: 802-864-2271 1-Mail: mail a("Ce'l-N-Lemn RECEIVED Mr. Paul Conner, City Planner MAR 10 2011 City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street CIPY Of So. Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Sphinx Development, LLC Office Building 1060 and 1090 Hinesburg Road PUD Preliminary & Final Plan Application Dear Mr, Conner: Thank you for taking the time to review the status of the Sphinx Development Application. We offer the following supplemental information in support of the preparation of Staff Report for the Development Review Board. Question: How will the lights in the building be controlled so that lights are not left on all night? All interior building lights are on occupancy sensors and/or a time clock in the lighting control panel. Lights located above doors are required to be on at night per the National Electric Code; other exterior building lights will be operated by the time clock in the lighting control panel and will be turned off at night. The parking lot lights will also be controlled by the time clock in the lighting control panel. One half of the parking lot lights will turn off at midnight; the balance of the parking lot lights will remain on all night to illuminate the parking lot in the event of a fire/rescue/security event. Question: There was discussion at the Sketch Plan level that indicated that the west entry of the building should become a major public access point and not just an emergency egress. We are required to have an exit on the west side of the building for emergency egress. We chose to make the exit more visually attractive by incorporating an aluminum storefront. The west side access permits entry for sidewalk and/or bus route traffic. The main entry is on the first floor on the east side of the building where it is easily Mr. Paul Conner Page 2 of 3 March 10, 2011 accessed from the parking lot consistent with the Land Development Regulations goals of placing parking on the rear of the buildings. . Statement — Confirmation of the retained trees value is required by the City Arborist. We understand from Mr. Justin Rabidoux that Mr. Craig Lambert is working on this now. The applicant is seeking a credit of approximately $16,000 (from a total valuation of $56,000 of trees to be retained on the property) against the required landscaping budget of $47.500 By inspection this should not be an issue, but we understand the City's process. Statement — City can not be held responsible for damages of site improvements located within the sewer easement area. Acknowledged. We would propose that the following condition of approval be included: "if the City id required to make repairs or improvements to the existing sewer main located along the south and east sides of the site, the applicant shall be responsible for the repairs of any damage that may occur to those site improvements located within the supporting existing sewer easements". Pedestrian Improvements along Hinesburg Road The Public Works Dept. has recommended that a sidewalk or other pedestrian circulation improvement be installed along the Hinesburg Road frontage. We understand that the Recreation Path Committee has recommended that a payment in lieu of construction be made by the applicant. The applicant is working with Mr. Justin Rabidoux on an acceptable value for the construction of a recreation path along Hinesburg Road. This value will be the basis of either a payment in lieu of construction (to be used by the City as part of larger scale improvements project) or as a value for bonding of the public improvements. We have reviewed this with Mr. Rabidoux and would recommend that the following condition of approval be used to address this. "The applicant shall either construct a 10-foot wide recreation path along the Hinesburg Road frontage within the proposed recreation path easement or make a payment in lieu 1 Mr. Paul Conner Page 3 of 3 March 10, 2011 of construction to the City. The construction value shall be $21,000 for bonding of the public improvements (or payment in lieu of construction) or an alternate value agreed upon by the Public Works Dept. If the construction option is chosen, the final design details shall be approved by the Pubic Works Dept. The path shall be in place prior to the issuance of a final certificate of occupancy." This completes our summary of the supplemental information that you requested. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 864-2323 x310. Respectfully,_. avid S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer ldsm cc: T. Chase (wl enclosures) G, Eltabbakh (w/ enclosures) CEA File 10169.00 (w/enclosures) P.\AutoCADD Projects120lOki 01&9\Permitting\City\Prelim PlatlLaftsePrelim-Final Cover.doc Page 1 of 1 Paul Conner From: Matthew J. Wamsganz [matt@cea-vt.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 3:41 PM To: Paul Conner Cc: ray; Dave Marshall Subject: FW: Sphinx Utility cabinets Attachments: Sphinx Screening Concept.pdf; ATT00110.htm Paul, Please see the attached landscaping sketch for the cooling tower and transformer. The proposed cooling tower is 15' high. Matt Matthew J. Wamsganz Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 P: 802-864-2323 x303 F: 802-864-2271 matt(cDcea-vt.com From: Patrick Olstad [mailto:patricko@landworksvt.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 11:54 AM To: dmarshall@cea-vt.com; Rob Higgins Cc: Matt Wamsganz; Chip Dillon; Tom Chase; Mark Neagley Subject: Re: Sphinx Utility cabinets Dave/Rob- RECEIVED MAR i � : d City of So. Burling''Ojn Please review attached screening concept sketch- let me know if shifting the tower as shown is feasible. If not, we won't be able to screen as effectively from the south. I can make this revision in CAD- just let me know if there is any 8 1/2 x 11 revision format I need to follow. Also note that I showed 10'-12' trees, which could take up to 5 years to reach 15' in height (typical evergreen growth is approximately 1' per year after the first year). We could specify 12'-14' trees for a more instant effect but I believe the price of those trees jumps quite a bit (I am checking on it). Patrick Patrick Olstad, ASLA + LEED AP :: Registered Landscape te V'Oe&V40" Architect :: t.andW rks + Sensible World 228 Maple Street, Suite 32 Middlebury, VT 05753 :: 802,388.3011 .... _._ 3/14/2011 --r 0 � W � fl W � � 3 f gititit i f. } t � 1 7J w i .. fl1 )( D eV E lv J south irlington PUBLIC WORKS MEMO To: Cathyann LaRose From: Justin Rabidoux, Director Date: March 9, 2011 Re: Sphinx Development, Medical and General Office, 1060 & 1090 Hinesburg Road Public Works staff reviewed plans for the referenced project ("SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC)", dated February 2011, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc.) and has the following comments to offer. Stormwater Comments 1. The project will disturb greater than 1 acre of land and create greater than 1 acre of impervious area. Therefore, this project will need both a construction stormwater permit (3-9020 or individual permit) and an operational stormwater permit (3-9015 or individual permit) from the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Stormwater Division. Obtaining these two permits should be a condition of approval for this project. 2. We received and reviewed hydrologic modeling information for this project on 1/30/11 and approve of its methods and findings. 3. It appears as if stormwater runoff from the expanded area of Rt. 116 and the new curb cut will be piped along the southern end of the parking lot and discharged near the property boundary on the SE corner of the lot. Could this water be directed to the proposed treatment pond by instead connecting it to CB #6 near the SE corner of the proposed building? How large a drainage area will the basins along Hinesburg Road collect? This water will discharge on to the neighboring property. What impacts will it have on the neighboring property? What is downstream of this discharge point? 4. Any final decision issued by the DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to maintain the stormwater treatment system in good working condition. 5. Any final decision issued by the DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to submit as built plans in both a paper and digital format. Landscaping Comments 6. We recommend using continuous planting pits filled with the planting soil specified in the planting detail to provide adequate soil volume to support tree growth. 7. Native soils in this part of the city tend to be neutral to slightly alkaline which often results in manganese deficiencies in Red Maples. Our experience is Freeman Maples seem to be more tolerant of this condition and may be a better species selection. We 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.658.7961 fax 802.658.7976 www.sburl.com Physical Address: 104 Landfill Road South Burlington Sphinx Development, LLC — 2"d Submission Public Works Review Comments 3/10/2011 recommend the varieties Celebration or Sienna Glen which tend to have better form and tree structure than the more commonly used Autumn Blaze. S. The locations of the tree protective zones should be indicated on the plans. 9. The size of tree protection zones should be based upon the size of the tree being protected. A generally accepted size is to establish the protective zone 1 ft. from the tree trunk for every inch of tree diameter at 4.5 ft above finished grade. For example, a 10 in. diameter tree should be protected so that no construction activity takes place within 10 ft. of the tree trunk. 10. We have reviewed the 12/20/10 Landscape Budget Summary prepared by LandWorks and agree with the values assigned. Further we agree that there is approximately $16,000 worth of trees identified as to be retained to credit toward the project. Water Comments 11. Page C-3 a. A 12 in. by 8 in. tapping sleeve needs to be used and 8 in. DI pipe must be used up to and including the hydrant tee. b. An 8 in. by 8 in. by 6 in. hydrant tee/anchor tree and 6 in. gate valve need to be installed for the hydrant assembly. c. After the hydrant tee, the 8 in. DI pipe may be reduced to 6 in. A gate valve shall be installed at all such transition locations. 12. Page C-4 a. Services shall be dug and shut off at the corporation, copper must be disconnected and curb boxes must be pulled out of the ground. 13. Page C-7 a. The detail showing ownership at the tapping sleeve needs to be changed to MUNICIPALLY OWNED/PRIVATELY OWNED. b. The hydrant detail needs to be changed to the latest version showing the valve attached to Anchor tee. c. Wherever water specifications are referenced, the words "Latest Version" shall be added. 14. Page C-10.2 a. Air testing is not permitted on tapping sleeves. A pressure test must be done with water. The tapping sleeve and valve must be pumped up to and hold at least 200 psi for 30 minutes. b. Any curb stops installed shall have stainless steel service rods attached to them. c. In PART 1-GENERAL SECTION 1.03 QUALITY ASSURANCE and PART 3- EXECUTION/INSTALLATION PROCEDURES it needs to be added that ALL WATER LINE WORK IS TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR ALL WATER SYSTEMS OWNED BY THE CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT. d. All DI pipe and fittings are to be poly wrapped. 15. Page C-10.3 a. In Section 3.03 it needs to be added that all Waterous Fire Hydrants shall be installed with a "Boston Operating Nut". b. An approved hydrant flag must be provided for each hydrant installed. Traffic Comments 16. We have reviewed the November 12, 2010 Traffic Study submitted by Lamoureux & Dickinson and agree with its contents and findings. The inclusion of the southbound left - turn land and street lighting address previous safety concerns we had. Page 2 of 3 Sphinx Development, LLC — 2"d Submission Public Works Review Comments 3/10/2011 General Comments 17. Regarding the inclusion of either a recreation path along the property's frontage or a financial contribution to a future city project to build the path, the applicant has proposed the following language, "The applicant shall either construct a 10-foot wide recreation path along the Hinesburg Road frontage within the proposed recreation path easement or make a payment in lieu of construction to the City. The construction value shall be $21,000 ($60/LF x 347 LF) for bonding of the public improvements (or payment in lieu of construction) or an alternate value agreed upon by the Public Works Dept. If the construction option is chosen, the final design details shall be approved by the Public Works Dept. The path shall be in place prior to the issuance of a final certificate of occupancy." Public Works supports both this language and the dollar figure of $60/LF used. 18. Public Works submitted earlier comments on October 27, 2010 covering the project's sketch plan submission. The applicant has satisfactorily addressed our concerns from that letter, except for any that may still appear in this communication. Specifically those comments related to the sewer infrastructure and general site construction details. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and please let me know if you have questions. Page 3 of 3 South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-846-4110 March 4, 2011 Mr. Ray Belair, Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Sphinx/Eltabbakh Office/Planned Unit Development Dear Ray: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of this medical office building at 1060 Hinesburg Road. I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Division of Fire Safety codes and standards. 2. Automatic sprinklers and fire alarm system. 3. Fire Department Sprinkler Connection locations to be specified by SBFD. 4. Fire Alarm System panels and enunciator location to be specified by SBFD. 5. Provide emergency key box(s) for the building, location to be specified by SBFD. 6. Elevator car(s) to be sized large enough to accommodate an ambulance stretcher in the flat position. 7. Provide at least 1 additional fire hydrant for the project. I would recommend it be located on the North West side of the building in the corner of the parking lot. 8. Provide 24 hour per day off -site (central station) monitoring of all fire alarm and fire protection systems. Page - 2 9. Per the plan dated February 2011, the overhang (portico) adjacent to the front entrance should be a minimum of 12'6" clear passage height. 10. Trees, fences and floral outcroppings should be placed so as not to interfere with the deployment of the aerial ladder, hoselines, portable ladders and other firefighting equipment. At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and the Vermont Division of Fire Safety. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief Subdivision Plat Application Permit Number SD- 11 - 16 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ri Preliminary X Final PUD Being Requested? X Yes ❑ No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Sphinx Development, LLC c/o Dr. Gamal Eltebbakh, 391 Hillspoint Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445. 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 1060 Hinesburg Road - Book 804 Pg 665. 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road - Book 806, Pg 24. 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Sphinx Development, LLC c/o Dr. Gamal Eltabbakh, 391 Hillspoint Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445. 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax David S. Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, 10 Mansfield View Lane, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Ph 864-2323 x310 F 864-2271 Email: dmarshall@cea-vt.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1060 (1.31 Acre) and 1070-80 (2.33 acre) Hinesburg Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) # 0860-106OR & 0860-107OR 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): Removal of the existing single family and duplex residential buildings, consolidation of Lots 1 & 2 at 1060 and 1070-80 Hinesburg Road, an construction of a 40,261 GSF office building (50% being medical and 50% being general office use) with supporting parking and infrastructure improvements. 1 of 2 Subdivision Plat Application b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 1060 Hinesburg Road: Single family house on 1.31 acres; 1070-80 Hinesburg Road: Duplex located on 2.33 acres. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Consolidation of two lots into one 3.64 acre parcel to house a 40,261GSF office building with a 50/50 mix of medical office and general office. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 40,261 GSF for the primary building. The Porte cochere on the east side of the building was not used in computing the GSF of the building for use purposes. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine). - Proposed first Floor Elev is Height of Building from 1st Fir + Top of Building Elevation: Average existing grade is Height of Building 398.50 38.58 437.08 - 400.20 (See Attachment) 36.88 The portion of the building that extends above the 35' building height limitation is primarily the top of the elevator shaft (1.88' above 35' max Bldg height). The elevations of the building depict the view angle of the public from Hinesburg Road and it shows that the top of the elevator shaft will not be visible from the road surface or a future recreation path. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): NA g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 122 office employees with periodic visitors. No company vehicles envisioned. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): A 1.88 foot height waiver is requested as well an 8 space parking waiver as it applies to the general office use component of the building. This property is not subject to any Overlay Districts. The property is subject to a 50' front yard setback from the proposed Hinesburg Road right-of-way width of 80 feet yielding a 57' setback from the existing right-of-way. The north parcel is currently encumbered by a 20' wide pedestrian easement on the west side and a 20' wide sewer easement on the east side in favor of the City of South Burlington . The south property is encumbered by a 20' wide sewer easement along the south side of the parcel in favor of the City of South Burlington i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot 2 of 2 Subdivision Plat Application mergers, etc. Consolidation of Lots 1 and 1 into one 3.64 acre lot. 9. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 3.64 Acres (158,494 SF) b. Building Coverage: Existing: 5,246 square feet: 3.3 % Proposed: 13,491 square feet 8.5 % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing: 11,925 square feet: 7.5 % Proposed: 78,070 square feet 49.3 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing: 4,292 square feet: 23.0 % Proposed: 1,780 square feet 9.5 % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? ❑ Yes X No Jeff Severson, a wetland ecologist, has visited the site and did not identify any wetlands on the property. Please see attached correspondence from him. b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) If yes, please submit the following with this application: NA 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. NA 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) NA 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 3.8 Acres (>160,000 SQ. FT.) *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. The applicant has received authorization fro coverage under GP 9020 from the VT DEC. 3 of 3 Subdivision Plat Application 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 4,000,000 b. Landscaping: $ 88,068 (Required $47,500 [250,000 x.03 + $250,000 x 0.02 + 3,500, 000 x 0.01 ]) Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) Attached with cover letter c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) Site Prep = $ 72,000 Roads & Parking = $ 410,000 Utilities = $ 45,000 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 975 VPD b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 100 VPH c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 101 VPH 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8 AM to 5 PM 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Winter 2011 16. PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach on a separate sheet. NAME MAILING ADDRESS WITH ZIP CODE PARCEL ID Avalanche Development, LLC, 35 Dorset Lane, Williston, VT 05495 0860-1050 Spaniel Properties, LLC, 1050 Hinesburg Road, Unit A, South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-1050 East Mountain View, LLC, 1100 Hinesburg Road, Suite 201, South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-0 ] 100 Burlington Properties, LTD, PO Box 0210, South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-1020 Jim Doucevicz & Al Senecal, c/o Doucevicz Development, Carmichael Street, Essex, VT 05451 0860-1075 4 of 4 Subdivision Plat Application Subdivision Plat Application DATE OF SUBMISSION: Ma have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: ';&rmplet� Incomplete irector of Planning & Zoning or Designee 6 of 6 Subdivision Plat Application Subdivision Plat Application EXHIBIT A PRELIMINARY PLAT The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred). On the Survey Plat Sheet P-1 o Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared. On the Survey Plat Sheet P-1 o Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.) On the Survey Plat Sheet P-1, This property is not encumbered by any 100-yr or 500-yr flood limits. o Location of easements, public lands, r.o.w.s, sidewalks, and public or private street (w/names) On the Survey Plat Sheet P-1 o Five foot contours (existing and finished) See Sheet C2 o Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. See Sheet C2 o Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks, and other public opens spaces. See Sheet C2 o Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. All Sheets o Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative water supply. See Sheet C2 o Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. See Sheet C2 o Details of storm water facilities in the form of a drainage plan. See Sheet C2 o Details of all proposed bridges or culverts. See Sheet C2 o Location of temporary markers. See Sheet C4 (benchmark) o All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions. On the Survey Plat Sheet P-1 (in the form of easements) o A list of waivers desired (if any). See Section 7 (h). o Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates). Start Date — Spring 2011. Completion Winter 2011/12. o A report addressing planned residential/unit development criteria of the Zoning Regulations. NA o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size). Please see Landscaping Plan o Location of abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping - See Sheet C4 o Number and location of parking spaces ( see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations) See Sheet C1 o Number and location of handicapped spaces (see Section 26.253(a) of the Zoning Regulations) See Sheet C1 o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard See Sheet C1 7 of 7 Subdivision Plat Application o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded. Attached with Application Cover Letter o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened), See Sheet C2 o Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. See Sheet C1 o If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats NA APPLICATION FEE Please call the Planning & Zoning office for fee information. 802-846-4106 8of8 C I V I L E, IG111wsiRl! Ir A'�rz'oJCI A rC`50. 111C, 10 Mansfield View Lane Phone: 802-864-2323 South Burlington, VT 05403 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com February 7, 2011 Mr. Justin Rabidoux, P.E. Director of Public Works 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Sphinx Development, LLC Office Building 1060 and 1090 Hinesburg Road PUD Preliminary & Final Plan Application Dear Mr. Rabidoux: The applicant has just submitted the preliminary/final plat application to the Development Review Board. As a courtesy, we have attached a copy of the plans and herein have summarized the original comments from the Dept. of Public Works Sketch Plan review and have formulated our responses in bold to assist you with the continued review of this project. 1. It appears that this project will disturb greater than 1 acre of land and create greater than 1 acre of impervious area. Therefore, this project will need both a construction stormwater permit (3-9020 or individual permit) and an operational stormwater permit (3-9015 or individual permit) from the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Stormwater Division. Obtaining these two permits should be a condition of approval for this project. The authorization from DEC for coverage under for the construction stormwater permit (3-9020) has been issued (see attachment). The application for the operational stormwater permit (3-9015) has been submitted to DEC. 2. Final hydrologic modeling information submitted to DEC should also be submitted to the stormwater utility for inclusion in a Potash Brook watershed model maintained by the City. This has been forwarded to Tom Dipietro. 3. Areas for snow storage should be indicated on the plans. These are depicted on the Landscaping Plan (2"d sheet from the end of the plan set) as outlined in the SBLDR's. 4. Any final decision issues by the DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to maintain the stormwater treatment system in good working condition. No issue. Mr. Justin Rabidoux Page 2 of 4 February 7, 2011 5. Consider including a detail for the level spreader. This is depicted on Sheet C9. 6. Consider the use of LID practices within the parking lot to provide pretreatment of runoff prior to discharge into the into the proposed detention pond. The project utilizes grass disconnection for a portion of the site consistent with the requirements of the State Stormwater Management Rules. 7. Sidewalk width shall be a minimum of five feet wide and not three and four and a half feet as plans show. Consistent with the meeting we had with representatives of the Dept. of Public Works, the portion of the sidewalk within the public right-of-way has been widened to 5 feet. 8. The applicant shall provide a means of access from southeast corner of the parking lot to existing sewer manhole located in the southeast corner of the property for maintenance. The plans now show a stabilized access to the existing sewer manhole in the southeast corner of the site. A proposed access easement is depicted on the Survey Plat Sheet P1 (3rd sheet from the end of the plan set). 9. The applicant shall provide a means of access to the proposed detention pond and proposed underground forebay. The proposed pond and underground forebay has been located close to the edge of the proposed parking lot so as to enable ready access for maintenance. The curb at the northeast end of the parking lot has been removed to facilitate access to the detention pond. 10. The Lane Press sewage pumping station shall be checked for capacity to handle the projected sewage flow from this building. We have contacted Steve Crosby from the City water Quality Section and he indicated that the proposed project will minimally increase the design flows to the pump station and it would not be an issue. We have forwarded the design flows to Steve, but he has not had a chance to provide written (or e-mail) confirmation of our discussion with him. 11. There shall be a sewer structure at the connection point for the service off the existing main. Given the service connection's location a structure would be needed for maintenance and problem verification. The location is identified on Sheet C3 as "Install Wye and Connect to Exist. 8: SDR 35 PVC". Consistent with the agreement during the applicant's last meeting with the Dept., of Public Works, a new "Dog House" sewer manhole is now proposed to be Mr. Justin Rabidoux Page 3 of 4 February 7, 2011 installed at the intersection of the proposed building sewer service line and the existing sewer main. The detail for this structure is shown on Sheet C7. 12. The turning radii where the project drive meets VT Route 116 is excessively wide given the proposed use. At its widest, the curb cut is shown at 80 feet wide. The radii has been revised to comply with the commercial access standards set forth by VTrans. 13. The applicant shall provide sidewalk along its frontage. The location, width and material will be subject to future discussions with Public Works. The Recreation Path Committee has recommended that in lieu of constructing a sidewalk or recreation path, that the applicant shall pay into a City Fund the equivalent cost of this construction. We have attached a portion of the competitive bid results for the South Village project in which a 1,200 foot portion of a 10-foot wide recreation path was to be graded and constructed as part of the Phase 1A contract. The results of the bids taken in June, 2007 was that the grading for the path was approximately $4 per LF (eliminating one outlier) and $25/LF (eliminating one outlier) for the construction of the path itself. To adjust this value to 2011 pricing, the CPI (attached) is up 6.1% over this period. To bring this project's scope pricing is line with the South Village base line (370 feet versus the 1,200 feet) we would recommend that a 25% premium be added. Based on the above values, the adjusted linear foot price would be $38.50/LF. Based on the 340 feet of frontage not occupied by roadways, the recommended cost allocation is $13,130. 14. On Sheet C3 there is a note and leader labeled "Proposed Transformer" in the northwest corner of the property that appears to point to nothing. This has been corrected. The following narrative is provided for your information on related infrastructure issues for the project. Fire Chief Preliminary Comments- 1-18-10 E-mail (Full correspondence is attached) Dave - I got the plans which you dropped off with Linda. I will formally review this project once the plans are submitted to P and Z. As you know there have been instances where plans I looked at with the project managers were not the same as the one's submitted to the office or to the DRB. Mr. Justin Rabidoux Page 4 of 4 February 7, 2011 My cursory review/look says.- 1- At least one other hydrant will need to be added, somewhere in the rear of the building. The location of the present hydrant unfortunately makes on -scene operations difficult, as soon as we hook up to the FDC to support the sprinkler system, the entire access road is blocked by hose and we can no longer get additional fire apparatus into the scene. An additional hydrant is now proposed on the north side of the proposed main entrance into the site. 2 - Our tallest travel height for trucks is 11' 10", so your suggested height should be an absolute minimum. This comment relates to the porte-cochere minimum clearance height of 12'-6". 3 - The other usuals, sprinklers, alarm system, key boxes, elevator size (this has been sized to support an ambulance gurney in the full recline position), perhaps standpipes, plans review by Vt Division of Fire, AHJ location approval for alarm panel, FDC. Acknowledged. Route 116 Improvements — The traffic study developed for the project recommends the installation of a dedicated left-hand turn lane into the project for southbound traffic on VT Route 116 (Hinesburg Road). VTrans has recommended that the pavement widening to accommodate the new turning lane be split evenly on both sides of the road. These improvements are depicted on Sheet C1.1 & C1.2. This completes our summary of the infrastructure issues for this project. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 864-2323 x310. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer Enclosures: Full Size Plan Set South Village Partial of Bid Tabulation CPI Table Recreation path Typical Detail cc: T. Chase (w/ enclosures, no plans) C. LaRose (no enclosures) CEA File 10169.00 (w/enclosures, no plans) R\AutoCADD Projects\2010\10169\Permitting\City\Prelim Plat\LaRosePrelim-Final Cover.doc let, trk0m >IAc-e mes and duplexes, passed the House. mony on this issue from fire fighters, trs, and many others over the course of „ ,rvation Daywas held at the State House Of citizens coming to talk about the tnd conservation work going on in their oncerns is the potential loss of up to ng following expiration of federal con- .216 would require that those owners oups operating on their behalf, an op - Our committee is hearing from own - )using advocates, housing developers, n housing issues. pirited debate, our committee led the 3sage of an important bill concerning of the important symbolic and practi-. .tion. Gaining recognition will mean seekk federal arts and crafts designa- •es for a better price and the tribes can education, cultural preservation, and ieir people thrive and their way of life ed out bills recognizing the Nulhegan te-recognized tribes. The bills, which are now under consideration in the eve they will pass through that body, of the Legislature and Governor for is recognition for the two tribes since mendation from the Vermont Com- fairs. tended our February Legislative Fo- rs for the next forum on March 28t' at try Drive. Meanwhile, please contact iggestions. I look forward to hearing :ruction also qualifies for FAA fund- .ent, according to Paris, "a whole lot were sought from other sources. venture are currently projected to r dollars over a twenty-year period cases. Emphasis was .placed on the t into effect, the implementations idar phase and more ".as demands J to submit comments on the pro- A video of the full meeting can be to roved' 1' k Dines senior Living t,, tirttstttattiry in ,` outii : Burlistgtori ofIfors I' , '2 17c d tetom apatttractal,. Rent inc�ltirlcs rill;iitililie4_ Optieiital liVlti ; aii<t Iie<�Idli Services, Coinimuiii1v 1otir 865 t 109 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING SB DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hear- ing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on March 15, 2011 at 7:30 p.m. to consider the following: I. Continued Master Plan application #MP-11-01 and preliminary plat appli- cation #SD-11-07 of Farrell Real Estate for a planned unit development on 25.91 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1), single family. dwelling, 2) constructing 25 single family dwellings, and 3) con- structing 22 two (2) family dwellings, 1302, 1340, and 1350 Spear Street. 2. Preliminary plat application #SD-11- 09 and final plat application #SD-11- 10 of Sphinx Development, LLC for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing•an existing single family dwelling and an existing two (2) fam- ily dwelling, 2) merging a 1.31 acre parcel and a 2.33 acre parcel into a 3.64 acre parcel, and 4) constructing a 40,261 sq. ft. building to contain equal parts general office use and medical office use, 1060 & 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road, Mark Behr, Chairman South Burlington Development Re- view Board Copies of the applications are avail- able for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. February24 2011 Oise Bedroom Lori T1W Terraces are Indep ildemL living condos located in Sliellttirne ti)r seit+cars 62 aitd older. 1',;itail dc.k(�t)d_b-s,c0 rl1 Or call 802? 383 600. WANTED LACROSSE COACHES NEEDED: South Burlington Girls Youth La- crosse is looking for coaches for the upcoming season mid -April through June. The 5th - 8th grade girls' program holds practice 2-3 days/week and jamborees on Sun- days. Please contact Anjie Soucy at asoucy@sbschools.net if inter- ested. (02/17) WOMEN WHO LOVE TO SING! Champlain Echoes is an all female a capella chorus in Chittenden County. We are currently in need of women who are able to sing in the soprano range. We sing four part harmony in the barbershop tradition, both traditional and contemporary music. Rehearsals are on Monday nights in South Burlington. 318-6225 for more in- formation. (02/17) VERMONT FLOWER SHOW IS SEEKING HELP: The Vermont Flower Show, rated one of the top 10 things to do in Vermont in the winter by the Vermont Chamber of Commerce, needs help. We are currently seeking volunteers for the biennial event which brings togethernearly 10,000 people from the -greater New England region. Horticulture businesses, garden centers, landscape designers and those interested in related fields will gather at the Champlain Val- ley Exposition in Essex Junction, Vermont from March 4-6. Call Delaney Meeting & Event Man- agement, 865-5202. (02/10) p ing a m to a PDF of the J Looking for Rice and BHS alumni who want to play in, or be a part vve treeI you lace fattoiI Need flelp witfi tiartsportatiwi �imci crrailds?, lscort to �il�ltc>t,ttnc�,tts? (;itx:c=o sliOPPisbi, and cooki,ir, I,igla fioilsekeel)ing am Iauil(iryt Nursing lens visit? Con ipatllomSl)if) it recrexiott? Travel cctmlt tni<stts? t3asic lac care? iVledicaliou reminders Offlh ws ati travel assistance? Exepc'i amdaid with pltysic:al Illerapy? Or arty oilier lank? Reasc sable races. (?all 657-3357 or 881-11t3£3_ contact Susan Cain O'BI (obrien@ricehs.org) in the I Alumni Office or John and Sb Pijanowski (srpij@comcast.j for information. All alumni welcome. Proceeds from I game.will benefit the Rice Bot ers and the Brian McNeil Sums Scholarship Fund. (02/10) FOR SALE CRIB: Contemporary, desigr White painted wood in excell condition. Retails for $700. Ask $250 (firm). 951-9547 (02/17) ITEMS: Radio/CD player, P $25; Antique copper tea kettle a stand. $60; Wicker footstool. 13 x 16"W. $30; Two nest of tab] blue wood. 20"Lx 19"H a 14"Wx26"W. $35; Antique pains fish pan. $40.658-3659 (02/17) NURSES SCRUBS: Many styl colors, tops and bottoms, all excellent condition. Mostlyin t size 14-16 range. $5 each or bi offer. Discount given for quant purchase. 865-4929 (02/17) TIRES: Three (3) Cooper C; touring tires. 225/55/R18. $; each.862-6181 (02/24) CIVI t Ell G) 111E'El"d1 Ir A��0r,IA HE'S, 11 IC, 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 February 2, 2011 Ms. Cathyann LaRose, Assistant Planner City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Sphinx Development, LLC Office Building 1060 and 1090 Hinesburg Road PUD Preliminary & Final Plan Application Dear Ms. LaRose: Phone: 802-864-2323 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Dr. Gamal Eltabbakh currently owns two properties located at 1060 and 1090 Hinesburg Road. The characteristics of the two properties are as follows.- 1060 Hinesburg Road 1.31 acres Industrial -Open Space District Single Family Residence 1090 Hinesburg Road 2.33 acres Industrial -Open Space District Duplex Family Residence Dr Eltabbakh is seeking to relocate his existing gynecological oncology practice in South Burlington to a new office building. His development company, Sphinx Development, LLC, is seeking to raise the two existing structures, consolidate the two lots and construct a new 40,261 GSF office building. Since these properties are located in the Industrial -Open Space Zoning District, the office project is required to be reviewed as a Planned Unit Development. We have outlined the primary design and Land Development Regulations compliance issues below in support of the Development Review Boards assessment of this application. Existing Encumbrances - The south property is encumbered by a 20' sewer easement that runs along the south and east edges of the parcel. The north parcel is encumbered by the same 20' sewer easement located along Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 2 of 2 February 2, 2011 its east edge, a 20' pedestrian easement in favor of the City of South Burlington along its frontage with Hinesburg Road and common access easement in favor of Avalanche Development along its common property line with the same to the north. Access - The two properties currently occupy 374 LF of frontage on Hinesburg Road and enjoy two curb cuts onto Hinesburg Road (VT Route 116). A third curb cut is shared with the Avalanche/Spaniel property to the north. This application seeks to discontinue the use of the two curb cuts serving the residential uses in favor of consolidating all access and egress requirements to a new curb cut at the south end of the property. This is consistent with the previous sketch plan submittal and the directives issued by the Vermont Agency of Transportation relative to access to VT Route 116. Proposed Building - The proposed building is three stories tall in which the bottom story is partially embedded below the existing grade. The details on the computed height of the building and how it relates to the 35 foot maximum allowed building height for a flat roof building in the 1/0 District is outlined below. Proposed first Floor Elev is 398.50 Height of Building from 1st Flr + 38.58 (ind. the top of the elev. shaft) Top of Building Elevation: 437.08 Average existing grade is - 400.20 Height of Building 36.88' The portion of the building that extends above the 35' building height limitation (by 1.88 feet) is primarily the top of the elevator shaft. The elevations of the building depict the view angle of the public from Hinesburg Road and it shows that the top of the elevator shaft will not be visible from the road surface or a future recreation path. We have attached the computation of the average existing grade and the proposed elevation drawings of the building. The building has a footprint of 13,491 SF not including the 843 SF for the porte cochere on the east side of the building (this is included in the to coverage calculations). Total gross square footage of the building is 40,261 SF. The proposed use in the building is 50% medical office and 50% general office. Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 3 of 3 February 2, 2011 Parking - The computation for the required parking is outlined below. Medical Office Use - 5 spaces/1000 GSF x 50% x 40,261 GSF = 100.7 Spaces General Office Use - 3.5 spaces/1000 GSF x 50% x 40,261 GSF = 70.5 Spaces Total Required Spaces = 171.2 Spaces Total Spaces Provided = 164 Spaces Consistent with the discussion that we had with the Development Review Board during the Sketch Plan presentation, we are proposing a waiver of 8 parking spaces from the 71 parking spaces required for the general office use component of the project. Handicap Parking Requirements 150 - 199 parking spaces = 6 Spaces Required Total Spaces Provided = 7 Spaces All of the parking has been distributed along the periphery of the building in the rear and a small portion on the side in accordance with the City's planning goals. Parking Lot Green Space - A minimum of 10% of the gross parking lot area is required to be buffered with green space. The attached computations show that the proposed parking lot configuration provides 10.5% green space. Lot Coverage - The 1/0 District permits up to 50% lot coverage. The attached computations indicate that the proposed lot coverage is 49.3%. Lighting - The proposed lighting will be provided by a series of lights with a mounting height of 18 feet. 3.5' high bollards will provide lighting along the walkways leading to the entry points of the building. A point grid analysis plan has been included with this plan package (Sheet C2.1) as well as the catalog cuts of the proposed lighting. Trash/Recycling - Will be stored in a screened structure located in the southwest corner of the parking. This location was chosen to facilitate access by the users of the building and for ease of refuse truck alignment for periodic removal. Stormwater Management - The site design will utilize the natural topography, Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 4 of 4 February 2, 2011 which is slightly sloping to the east, to provide positive drainage to a new detention basin that will be designed to comply with the requirements of the State Stormwater Rules and the City of South Burlington Stormwater Ordinance. The parking lot is proposed to utilize both curbed and uncurbed sections so as to allow the water to pass unimpeded to the treatment system while also providing means for snow removal at the north and south end of the main parking lot. Roof runoff and areas immediately around the non -paved portions of the building will be collected and conveyed in one system to the proposed detention basin. The majority of the parking lot runoff will be collected and conveyed to a subsurface forebay and then directed to the new detention basin. A portion of the southeast quadrant of the parking lot will flow by sheet flow to a grass disconnection area with slopes of no greater than 5%. This will satisfy the State Stormwater permitting requirements for infiltration of 10% of the impervious surface which occupies the C hydrologic group soils spanning the mid -portion of the site. Peak flow controlled discharges from the detention basin will be redistributed to the main stormwater conveyance path through a level spreader as a means of minimizing the potential for concentrated flows causing erosion of the existing meadow surface. The proposed stormwater peak flows have been balanced and managed so as not to create a net increase to any of the three surrounding properties as outlined below. Sphinx Development Office Building Storm Drainage Summary Peak Flows from Site 1-Year Design Storm (cfs) (cfs) Existing Proposed North End of Property 2.75 0.44 South End of Property 0.98 0.82 Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 5of5 February 2, 2011 Total Flow from Property 3.72 1.16 10-Year Design Storm (cfs) (cfs) Existing Proposed North End of Property 6.50 6.46 South End of Property 2.25 1.71 Total Flow from Property 8.74 7.53 Utilities - Water, Gas and Power all run parallel to and on the east side of Hinesburg road. This provides ready access for the project to these public and private utilities. The proposed building mechanical room is located in the southwest corner of the structure. The building will be served by a new 8" connection to the 12" water main and a new gas service will be extended from the existing 4" gas main. A new hydrant is proposed on the north side of the main entrance to address the request of the Fire Chief. A new drop with underground conduit from the overhead power, telephone and cable lines will provide three phase service to a new transformer on the south side of the building located outside of the front and side yard setbacks. An air handling/chiller unit is proposed to be located on the south side of the building. This has been located in a portion of the site that will sit approximately eight (8) feet below the existing grade. This will be further mitigated with landscaping as depicted in the landscaping plan included in the plan package. Landscaping - Currently the site is comprised of approximately two-thirds open meadow. The area around the two existing buildings does include a number of specimen trees. The landscaping plan shows how the existing specimen trees to be retained will be augmented. The existing condition plan, Sheet C-4, shows the trees that are proposed to be retained and those that are proposed to be removed. Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 6 of 6 February 2, 2011 Sketch Plan Staff Comments 1. The South Burlington Water Department should review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. A set of plans have been forwarded to Eric Metcalf at the Water Dept. for Review. 2. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater capacity allocation from the Director of Planning and Zoning, prior to recording of the final plat plans. An application has been forwarded to Paul Conner and we understand that the issuance of this allocation is pending a Preliminary Plat approval from the DRB. 3. The applicant shall submit an erosion control plan alongside the site grading and drainage plan as part of preliminary plat application. The EPSC Plan, narrative and supporting details are depicted on Sheets C5.0 through C5.2 4. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The plans submitted with this application exceed these standards. 5. The applicant shall submit an elevation and clearance for the porcte-cochere as part of preliminary plat application. The elevations of the proposed building have been submitted with this application package. The clearance at the porte-cochere is labeled as 12.5 feet at the west edge of the curbing. The Fire Chief indicated that their equipment has a maximum height of approximately I V — 10" and that they would not be placing any equipment under the porte-cochere. 6. The site plan shall be revised to reduce the width of the curb cut and turning radii in accordance with the recommendations of the Director of Public Works. The curb cut has been revised to comply with the requirements set forth by VTrans for commercial access curb cuts on a State Highway. 7. The applicant shall provide a 20 foot easement along Hinesburg Road to the City of South Burlington. This 20 foot strip may begin at the planned State right-of-way of Hinesburg Road and should be in line with a similar existing easement to the south. This proposed easement is depicted on the Survey Plat (Sheet P1) and the Site Plan Sheet C2. 8. The South Burlington Fire Department shall review the plans prior to preliminary plat Approval. In accordance with the request of Chief Brent, we will defer to Staff in forwarding plans of the application package to him for review and comment. 9. The applicant shall complete and submit a traffic study as part of the preliminary plat application. A copy of the traffic study is attached. The recommended and proposed improvements on VT 116 (Hinesburg Road) are depicted on Sheets C1.1 & C1.2. Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 7 of 7 February 2, 2011 10. The applicant shall provide wetlands delineation as part of preliminary plat review. If no wetlands exist, the applicant shall submit a statement from a licensed professional. Attached is a summary from Jeff Severson of Oakledge Environmental stating that there are no wetlands on the property. 11. The applicant should clarify the size of the stormwater retention pond on the property and whether or not it shall require state review. If necessary, the City's Stormwater staff shall review the details of the pond and related stormwater mitigation measures. A State Operational Stormwater permit is required and an application for approval has been submitted to the State. A copy of this package has been forwarded to Tom Dipietro. 12. The applicant should consider the use of Low Impact Development Techniques for management of stormwater on site. The project utilizes grass disconnection for a portion of the site consistent with the requirements of the State Stormwater Management Rules. 13. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All of the proposed utility lines are to be placed underground. 14. The Recreation Path Committee shall review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval and make a recommendation concerning the dedication of a recreation path easement and the construction of a recreation path. We understand that the Recreation Path Committee has recommended that in lieu of constructing a sidewalk or recreation path, that the applicant shall pay into a City Fund the equivalent cost of this construction. 15. The City Engineer shall review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. We will defer to Staff in forwarding plans of the application package to him for review and comment. 16. The applicant shall submit plans showing proposed lighting locations and details (cutsheets) as part of the preliminary plat application. A point grid analysis plan has been included with this plan package (Sheet C2.1) as well as the catalog cuts of the proposed lighting. 17. The plans shall be revised to depict a bicycle rack as part of the preliminary plat Application. A bicycle rack is proposed on the east side of the building just south of the porte-cochere. 18. If any portion of the proposed structure exceed 35 feet in height above the average preconstruction grade, the applicant shall submit a height waiver request in accordance with section 3.07 (F)(2) of the Land Development Regulations shall be submitted as part of the preliminary plat application. The details on the computed height of the building and how it relates to the 35 foot maximum allowed building height for a flat roof building in the I/O District is outlined on the following page. Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 8 of 8 February 2, 2011 Proposed first Floor Elev is 398.50 Height of Building from 151 Fir + 38.58 Oncl. the top of the elev. shaft) Top of Building Elevation: 437.08 Average existing grade is - 400.20 Height of Building 36.88, The portion of the building that extends above the 35' building height limitation (by 1.88 feet) is primarily the top of the elevator shaft. The elevations of the building depict the view angle of the public from Hinesburg Road and it shows that the top of the elevator shaft will not be visible from the road surface or a future recreation path. We have attached the computation of the average existing grade and the proposed elevation drawings of the building. 19. The applicant shall provide written documentation from the Vermont Agency of Transportation stating their position on a shared driveway access at the northwestern corner of the properly prior to preliminary plat approval. Correspondence from VTrans concerning the recommended curb cut for this project is attached. 20. The applicant shall submit building costs as part of the preliminary plat application. The estimated cost for the building construction is $4,000,000. 21. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan for the subject property, prepared in accordance with Section 13.06 of the SBLDR, as part of the preliminary plat application. A Landscaping plan prepared by Land -Works with supporting details is attached as Sheets L-1 and L-2. 22. The applicant shall demonstrate the need for the removal of existing trees and hedges on the property. Sheet C-4 depicts the existing trees and hedge rows on the property and identifies those specifically to be removed. The hedge row between this property and the commercial property to the north has been retained. The hedge row that runs in the north south direction is proposed to be removed in favor of reinforcing the specimen tree layout and the supplemental Shadblow plantings along the remaining west fagade of the building. Within this hedge row Is a willow tree which is inconsistent with the character of the specimen trees to be retained and the proposed supplemental plantings. 23. The applicant shall submit an itemized landscaping budget for the subject property, in compliance with Table 13-9 of the SBLDR, as part of the preliminary plat application. The itemized landscape budget as well as documentation on the means of computation of the value of the trees to be retained is attached. 24. The applicant shall specify the types of landscaping to be installed in the parking area as a part of the landscaping plan. This species are called out and are supported with a schedule on the Landscaping Plan Sheet L1. Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 9of9 February 2, 2011 25. The plans shall be revised to depict adequate snow storage areas as part of preliminary plat application. The proposed snow storage areas are depicted on the Landscaping Plan Sheet L1. 26. The landscaping plan shall include any utility cabinets on the site. They shall be effectively fenced and screened to the approval of the Development Review Board prior to final plat approval. The proposed utility cabinets and ground mounted air handing unit and proposed landscaping screening is depicted on the Landscaping Plan. 27. The applicant shall incorporate the recommendations outlined in the memo from the Director of Public Works (dated Oct 27, 2010) into the preliminary plat application. Please see below. Public Works Comments — Sketch Plan comments received from the Dept. of Public Works have been reviewed and applied to this application as outlined below in bold font. It appears that this project will disturb greater than 1 acre of land and create greater than 1 acre of impervious area. Therefore, this project will need both a construction stormwater permit (3-9020 or individual permit) and an operational stormwater permit (3-9015 or individual permit) from the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Stormwater Division. Obtaining these two permits should be a condition of approval for this project. The authorization from DEC for coverage under for the construction stormwater permit (3-9020) has been issued (see attachment). The application for the operational stormwater permit (3-9015) has been submitted to DEC. 2. Final hydrologic modeling information submitted to DEC should also be submitted to the stormwater utility for inclusion in a Potash Brook watershed model maintained by the City. This has been forwarded to Tom Dipietro. 3. Areas for snow storage should be indicated on the plans. These are depicted on the Landscaping Plan as outlined in the SBLDR's. 4. Any final decision issues by the DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to maintain the stormwater treatment system in good working condition. No issue. 5. Consider including a detail for the level spreader. This is depicted on Sheet C9. Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 10 of 10 February 2, 2011 6. Consider the use of LID practices within the parking lot to provide pretreatment of runoff prior to discharge into the into the proposed detention pond. The project utilizes grass disconnection for a portion of the site consistent with the requirements of the State Stormwater Management Rules. 7. Sidewalk width shall be a minimum of five feet wide and not three and four and a half feet as plans show. Consistent with the meeting we had with representatives of the Dept. of Public Works, the portion of the sidewalk within the public right-of-way has been widened to 5 feet. 8. The applicant shall provide a means of access from southeast corner of the parking lot to existing sewer manhole located in the southeast corner of the property for maintenance. The plans now show a stabilized access to the existing sewer manhole in the southeast corner of the site. A proposed access easement is depicted on the Survey Plat Sheet P1. 9. The applicant shall provide a means of access to the proposed detention pond and proposed underground forebay. The proposed pond and underground forebay has been located close to the edge of the proposed parking lot so as to enable ready access for maintenance. The curb at the northeast end of the parking lot has been removed to facilitate access to the detention pond. 10. The Lane Press sewage pumping station shall be checked for capacity to handle the projected sewage flow from this building. We have contacted Steve Crosby from the City water Quality Section and he indicated that the proposed project will minimally increase the design flows to the pump station and it would not be an issue. We have forwarded the design flows to Steve, but he has not had a chance to provide written confirmation of our discussion with him. 11. There shall be a sewer structure at the connection point for the service off the existing main. Given the service connection's location a structure would be needed for maintenance and problem verification. The location is identified on Sheet C3 as "Install Wye and Connect to Exist. 8: SDR 35 PVC". Consistent with the agreement during the applicant's last meeting with the Dept., of Public Works, a new "Dog House" sewer manhole is now proposed to be installed at the intersection of the proposed building sewer service line and the existing sewer main. The detail for this structure is shown on Sheet C7. Ms. Cathyann La Rose Page 11 of 11 February 2, 2011 12. The turning radii where the project drive meets VT Route 116 is excessively wide given the proposed use. At its widest, the curb cut is shown at 80 feet wide. The radii has been revised to comply with the commercial access standards set forth by VTrans. 13. The applicant shall provide sidewalk along its frontage. The location, width and material will be subject to future discussions with Public Works. The Recreation Path Committee has recommended that in lieu of constructing a sidewalk or recreation path, that the applicant shall pay into a City Fund the equivalent cost of this construction. 14. On Sheet C3 there is a note and leader labeled "Proposed Transformer" in the northwest corner of the property that appears to point to nothing. This has been corrected. Fire Chief Preliminary Comments- 1-18-10 E-mail (Full correspondence is attached) Dave - I got the plans which you dropped off with Linda. I will formally review this project once the plans are submitted to P and Z. As you know there have been instances where plans I looked at with the project managers were not the same as the one's submitted to the office or to the DRB. My cursory review/look says: 1- At least one other hydrant will need to be added, somewhere in the rear of the building. The location of the present hydrant unfortunately makes on -scene operations difficult, as soon as we hook up to the FDC to support the sprinkler system, the entire access road is blocked by hose and we can no longer get additional fire apparatus into the scene. An additional hydrant is now proposed on the north side of the proposed main entrance into the site. 2 - Our tallest travel height for trucks is 11' 10", so your suggested height should be an absolute minimum. This comment relates to the porte-cochere minimum clearance height of 12'-6". 3 - The other usuals, sprinklers, alarm system, key boxes, elevator size (this has been sized to support an ambulance gurney in the full recline position), perhaps standpipes, plans review by Vt Division of Fire, AHJ location approval for alarm panel, FDC. Acknowledged. Route 116 Improvements — The traffic study developed for the project recommends the installation of a dedicated left-hand turn lane into the project for southbound traffic on VT Route 116 (Hinesburg Road). VTrans has recommended that the pavement widening to accommodate the new turning lane be split evenly on both sides of the road. These improvements are depicted on Sheet C1.1 & C 1.2. Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 12 of 12 February 2, 2011 Flag Pole —A non -illuminated light pole is now proposed to be installed on the east side of the building. Based upon the limited number of issues associated with the project, the applicant is seeking a consolidation of the preliminary and final plat hearings to facilitate project scheduling. Please find attached a completed application and supporting plans for this proposed facility. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 864-2323 x310. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer \dsm Enclosures: Five (5) Full Size and one 11" x 17" Reduced Size Plan set including: Traffic Study Construction Stormwater Authorization Severson Wetland Correspondence VTrans Correspondence Chief Brent Correspondence Existing Grade Computation Lot and Bldg Coverage Calculation & 10% Green Space Computation Site Lighting Catalog Cuts Landscaping Schedule of Values Preliminary Plat Application and Fee ($513) Final Plat Application and Fee ($513) cc: T. Chase (w/ enclosures) G. Eltabbakh (w/ enclosures) CEA File 10169.00 (w/enclosures) PAAutoCADD Projects\2010\10169\Permitting\City\Pre1im Plat\LaRosePrelim-Final Cover.doc 1 Lamoureux Et Dickinson LDCivil Engineers Planners Septic Designers Landscape Architects Land Surveyors November 12, 2010 David Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Sphinx Development, LLC PUD 1060-1080 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington Dear Dave, As requested, enclosed is a copy of the Traffic Impact Assessment for construction of a general/medical office building to be located at 1060-1080 Hinesburg Road in South Burlington. We thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Please feel free to contact us should you have any questions or if we may be of additional assistance. Sincerely, 4g Roger Vi'ck'inson, P.E., PTOE P:\2010\10081\trafrpt.wpd 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 t: 802.878,4450 f: 802.878.3135 www.LDengineering.com + 25 Years Serving Fellow Vermonters +� . _. �v Traffic Impact Assessment Sphinx Development, LLC PUD 1060-1080 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT November 12, 2010 Introduction Sphinx Development, LLC is proposing to consolidate and redevelop two existing parcels located on Hinesburg Road in South Burlington. The proposed redevelopment will replace two existing residential buildings with a new 40,261 sf general/medical office building. For the purpose of this traffic impact assessment, the split between general and medical offices is estimated to be 50/50. Access to Hinesburg Road will be via a single new driveway located at the southerly edge of the property, with parking located to the rear of the new building. Hinesburg Road in the immediate vicinity of this Project is a state highway; Vermont Route 116. It is classified by the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) as an urban principal arterial. No -Build Traffic Volumes Current daily traffic volumes past the Project site are estimated to be approximately 7,000 vehicles per day. Morning and afternoon peak hour volumes were obtained from a turning movement count performed on June 24, 2008 by this office at the Hinesburg Road/Meadowtand Drive intersection. A copy of that count is enclosed as Attachment A. Design hour traffic volumes (DHV's) are the 30"' highest hourly traffic volume that occur on a roadway in a given year. DHV's are used in the design of highways and intersections to determine existing and future traffic congestion conditions. The DHV for Hinesburg Road at this location was calculated in the following manner. The 2008 DHV at Continuous Count Station D129, located on VT Route 2A in Williston, equated 1,708 vph. On June 24, 2008 the pm peak hour volume at CTC D129 equated 1,641 vph. The resulting DHV adjustment factor equaled 1.04 (1,708/1,641). This factor was then applied to the observed morning and peak hour volumes at the Hinesburg Road/Meadowtand Drive intersection. VTrans recommended urban area growth factors were also applied to estimate future DHV's. The year 2016 was selected as being a five-year projection from the anticipated construction of this Project. Figure 1 shows the estimated 2016 No -Build DHV's for the morning and afternoon peak hours in the study area. Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Sphinx Development, LLC PUD November 12, 2010 Page 2 rigure 1 - LUl b Ito-tsuitci UHV's AM Peak Flour I PM Peak Hour Hinesburg Rd + Hinesburg Rd T 166 84 N 468 22 N y V y 11 K 29 Meadow- K 120 Meadow- Ae 1 land Dr ie 36 land Dr T �► T 71 526 30 259 3 167 0 y V R 0 Sphinx le 0 Development T 21 556 0 Hinesburg Rd 504 0 � y K 0 Sphinx ie 0 Development T � 262 0 Hinesburg Rd Additional trips were added to the above background traffic volumes to account for development at the nearby Meadowland Business Park and at 1200 Hinesburg Road that has been permitted and/or constructed since 2008. Those trips were obtained from traffic impact assessments prepared by this office for those projects, and are shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows the resulting total No -Build Volumes. Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Sphinx Development, LLC PUD November 12, 2010 Page 3 Figure Z - other Uevelopment l nps AM Peak Hour I PM Peak Hour Hinesburg Rd T Hinesburg Rd T 66 84 N 35 16 N 4 y K 13 Meadow- K 64 Meadow - le 2 land Dr V 21 land Dr 23 30 1 85 2 68 0 K 0 Sphinx le 0 Development T 21 1 53 0 Hinesburg Rd 56 0 y y K 0 Sphinx le 0 Development T � 87 0 Hinesburg Rd Figure 3 - 2016 No -Build DHV's r Hinesburg Rd T 232 168 N � y K 42 Meadow- K 3 land Or 549 60 235 0 4 y K 0 Sphinx to 0 Development 609 0 Hinesburg Rd Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. PAA Paafr Mntir Hinesburg Rd T 503 38 N � y K 184 Meadow- ie 57 land Dr T 21 344 5 560 0 K 0 Sphinx IC 0 Development', T � 349 0 Hinesburg Rd Sphinx Development, LLC PUD November 12, 2010 Page 4 P roiect-Ge ne rated Trips The trip generation of this Project was estimated using trip generation data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for general and medical office buildings. Table 1 shows the resulting estimated average weekday peak hour vehicular trip generation. Table 1 - Averaee Weekdav Peak Hour Vehicle Trips Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total LUC 710 - General Office Building 20,650 sf 47 6 53 5 26 31 LUC 720 Medical Office Building 20,650 sf 37 10 47 19 51 70 Totals 84 16 100 24 1 77 101 The directional patterns of the project trips were estimated by analogy to the observed directional patterns of existing traffic at the Hinesburg Road/Meadowtand Drive intersection. Figure 4 illustrates the trip distribution of Project -generated peak hour trips. Figure 5 illustrates the resulting total of background (no -build) traffic volumes plus Project trips for the morning and afternoon peak hours. hieure 4 - AM Peak Hour ect I rips PM Peak Hour Hinesburg Rd Hinesburg Rd T 63 0 N 20 0 N 4,V +V K 0 Meadow- K 0 Meadow- K 0 land Dr le 0 land Dr T 0 8 0 0 63 K 14 Sphinx ie 2 Development T F0 2, Hinesburg Rd Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. 0 20 .40 iC 58 Sphinx iC 19 Development 0 4 Hinesburg Rd Sphinx Development, LLC PUD November 12, 2010 Page 5 riguie Z) - LUio Duiiu vnv 5 AM Peak Hour I PM Peak Hour Hinesburg Rd fi+ 295 168 N K 42 Meadow- 94 3 land Dr T � 563 60 235 63 � y * 14 Sphinx * 2 Development 609 21 Hinesburg Rd Hinesburg Rd t 523 38 N K 184 Meadow - le 57 land Dr 402 5 560 20 K 58 Sphinx le 19 Development 349 4 Hinesburg Rd Traffic Congestion Conditions Traffic congestion conditions are identified by "Levels of service", commonly referred to as "LOS". The ranges are A to F; where A represents essentially free flow (no congestion), C represents average congestion, and F represents severe congestion. At intersections, the LOS is determined by the over-all delay experienced by all turning and through movements. The level of service criteria for intersections is shown in Table 2. Table 2 - Level of Service/Delav Criteria' LOS Average Delay (sec/veh) LOS Average Delay (sec/veh) Signalized Unsignalized Signalized Unsignalized A <10 s10 D <55 <35 B <_.20 <15 E <80 <50 C _<35 _<25 F >80 >50 ' Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000 Lamoureux & Dickinson MMM Consulting Engineers, Inc. Sphinx Development, LLC PUD November 12, 2010 Page 6 In Vermont, VTrans has adopted a level of service policy for the state highway system. This policy establishes LOS C as the desired design target for the overall intersection at signalized intersections. The overall intersection level of service is determined by the weighted average of the delay experienced on all approaches. Individual approach and/or lane levels of service at signalized intersections may be lower than LOS C. At two-way stop controlled intersections having > 100 vph approach volume on a single -lane side street approach or >_150 vph approach volume on a two-lane side street approach, the VTrans level of service policy establishes LOS D as the desired design target on the minor street approach(s). There is no level of service standard for unsignalized intersections not meeting the above side street volume thresholds. Intersection capacity analyses were performed at the proposed Hinesburg Road/Project Access for both the "No -Build" and "Build" scenarios. For the purpose of this TIA, this intersection was analyzed as a two-way stop unsignalized intersection with a combination left-turn/right-turn exit lane. The incremental impact of this Project on future traffic congestion conditions can be determined by comparing the results of the two sets of analyses. Capacity analyses were also performed at the existing Hinesburg Road/Meadowland Drive intersection located approximately 450 ft north of the proposed Project Access under the assumption that it might be signalized by the year 2016. The results of the capacity analyses at both intersections are shown in Table 3. Detailed results are enclosed as Attachment B. Table 3 - 2016 Levels of Service Et Avg. Delays (sec/veh) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour (DHV) No -Build Build No -Build Build Meadowland Drive A (4.7) A (4.7) A (7.7) A (7.7) Project Access B (13.4) B (13.2) The results of the above analyses show that Hinesburg Road has sufficient capacity to accommodate this Project's peak hour trips, and will continue to provide acceptable levels of service in the immediate vicinity. One effect of signalizing the Meadowland Drive intersection in the future will be to create queues of northbound traffic extending south towards the new Project Access intersection. Conceivably, if those Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Sphinx Development, LLC PUD November 12, 2010 Page 7 queues were long enough, they could block turning movements in and out of the Project Access. However, the results of the foregoing analyses indicate that the northbound 95`queue lengths at Meadowland Drive will be 175 ft and 135 ft during the morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively. Those are both less than half the distance between the two intersections. Future signalization of the Meadowland Drive intersection, therefore, is not anticipated to create any interference with vehicles being able to enter or exit the new Project Access during peak hours. Safety The posted speed limit on Hinesburg Road changes from 40 mph to 45 mph just south of this Project. Using 45 mph, the recommended intersection sight distance equals 500 ft. Existing intersection sight distances from the new Project Access intersection exceed 1,000 ft both north and south. A second consideration related to future traffic safety conditions is whether turn lanes are warranted on Hinesburg Road at the new Project Access intersection. Vehicles slowing or stopped to make a turning movement create conflicts in the major street traffic flow, particularly as major- street vehicular speeds increase. For this reason, warrants have been established for both left- and right -turn lanes. Examining those warrants during the future morning and afternoon peak hour periods indicates that a southbound left -turn lane, providing a storage length of 75 ft, will be warranted during the morning peak hour. Detailed results are enclosed as Attachment C. Conclusion From the foregoing analyses, we have formed the following conclusions and recommendations regarding the potential traffic congestion and safety impacts of this Project: • Intersection capacity analyses at the new Project Access and the nearby Meadowland Drive intersections indicate that acceptable levels of service will be provided with this Project. • A new left -turn lane providing 75 ft of storage length should be installed on Hinesburg Road to serve the southbound left -turn movement entering this Project in order to prevent unnecessary conflicts between left -turning vehicles and through traffic. • Traffic control devices (signs and pavement markings) should be provided at the new Project Access intersection as required and/or recommended by the MUTCD. • We also recommend that street lighting be installed at the new Project Access intersection to provide adequate night-time visibility. Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Attachment A rw� . Weather: Cloudy 2,3unted By: A.J. Aportas .ration: South Burlington Project #: 08048 (Lamoureux & Dickinson I 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 (802) 878-4450 File Name : Hinesburg rd_Meadowland am Site Code : 00000048 Start Date : 6/24/2008 Page No : 2 V7 Route 116 Meadowland Drive VT Route 116 - Southbound I Westbound I Northbound Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total a. Left ;^-Thru Ri ht _ Peds' A r . Total Int. Total Peak hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM: 15 35 0 0 50 0 0 11 0 11 ' 0 116 9 0 125 186 07-.30 AM j 21 37 0 0 58 1 0 10 0 11 1 0 129 5 0 134 203 07:45 AM 27 45 0 0 72 0 0 2 0 2; 0 127 8 0 135 209 08:00 AM i16 39 0 0 55 0 0 4 0 4' 0 123 6 0 129 188 Total Volume � 79 156 0 0 235 - 1-- 0�--�27 — 0 --__- -- 28 � 0 495 28 _- -- 0 523 _ 7$6 %App. Total 1 33.6 66.4 0 0 3.6 0 96.4 0 0 94.6 5.4 0 PHF 731- _867 000 .000 .816 .250 .000 .614 .000 .63_6rt 000 _ .959 .778 .000 .969, -.940 VT o e 1 Out to _Total 01 158 j_^ T9_fA__ 6! Right Thru Lett Peds +J I L4 Peak Hour Data r-� r ` —� North L- w aloe 0 Peak Hour Begrns at OiaS O LJ N[ Passenger Cars I Head Trucks01 rn 1 I T - LeftThru RRight_Peds oo r�1� --- 23; r 680 i-_157 f , Out In Total VT Route 116 ,amoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 Weather: Cloudy (802) 878-4450 File Name : Hinesburg rd_Meadowland pm Counted By: A.J. Aponas Site Code : 00000048 ation: -South Burlington Start Date : 6/24/2008 Project #: 08048 Page No : 2 Start Time Left ; VT Route 116 Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Lefr Meadowland Drive Westbound Thru Right Peds i App_ Total Left V r Route 116 Northbound _ Thru Right Peds I App Total fnt. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 5 106 0 0 111 I 11 0 50 0 61 1 0 57 0 0 57 229 04:45 PM I 7 97 0 0 104 7 0 17 0 24, 0 74 2 0 76 204 05:00 PM 6 127 0 0 133 11 0 29 0 40 j 0 62 1 0 631 236 05:15 PM 3 111 0 0 114 5 0 17 0 22 '. 0 51 0 0 51 1 187 Total Volume 21 441 0 0 462 34 0 113 0 147 0 244 3 0 247 856 % Apes- Total 4.5 _ 95.5 0 0 23.1 0 76.9 0 0 98.8 1.2 0 PHF!.750 .868 .000 .000 .868 .773 .000 .565 .000 .6- 02fi .000 .824 .375 .000 .813�_ .907 Vr Route 1_ Out In Total 357 __ 621 ` 819 I oT 41 i"— 2i i Dl Right Thru Left Peds I Peak Hour Data off' m FU North Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM o IJ m o Passenger Cars Heavy Trucks j I I II j Left Thru Ri: ht Peds ! _ 0 244 3L-T_0� 475, 247i ! 7221 Out v In Total i Route LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES PROJECT / TOWN: South Burlivipc on PROJECT #: 10081 INTERSECTION: v'r If 6 & Mcm1owlamb- COUNTDAY/DATE: L&D 6./24i08 AM/PM?: AM (7:15-8:15) ENTER DHV ADJ. FACTORS: DHV 2Ull = 1.041 BASE YEAR 4940 = 1.010 FUT. YEAR =?I}?f) = 1.020 ar.�xb ( 0)( 156) ( 79) ( 0 l E 164 l[ 83 l 0 } { 166 { 84 ) ie 41 V BY: R. Dickinson CI IECKED: KEY ( ) OBSERVED PEAK HOUR VOLUME [ ) ,20-2ft" DHV { ,V.o)67= DHV 01 ( 0) A K ( ? 7)[ 28 l { 2 9) Ql { 01 4 + ( ()){ 01 ( 01 ( 0)E 01 { 0) si V I)E 11 ( 1) K + 7I t1) ( 495) ( 28 ) 01 [ 520 1 ( 291 0 ) { 526 ) { 30 ) TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES: YEAR WEST EAST NORTH SOUTH COUNT ( 0) ( 135 } ( 757 } ( 680 } 2010 [ 0} [ 141 ] [ 795] [ 714] 2020 { 0 ; ; 144 ; ( 805 ] { 723 P 1Lmpoyee FolderslROGEMI'RAFFIC.gpw, 11/09/10 LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES PROJECT / TOWN: South Burlington PROJECT #: 10081 INTERSECTION: VT 116 & Maidow•lw)ds COUNT DAY/DATE: L& D 6/24i08 AM/PM?: 1'\9 (4:30-5:30) ENTER DHV ADJ. FACTORS: DHV = 1.041 BASE YEAR 2011 = LOW FUT. YEAR 2016 = 1.020 { 0 } ( 441 21 ) [ 0 ] [ 464 ] [ 22 j i 0 ] { 468 .[ i 22 } le 40 V BY: R. Dickinson CHECKED: KEY { ) OBSERVED PEAK HOUR VOLUME [ J 2011 DHV ( } 2016 DHV ( 0)[ 0] { 0; 71 K ( 113}[ 119] ; 1201 ( 0) [ 0 ] ; 0 } thI L, ( 34) [ 361 1 36 ; R T A 0)( 241)( 3} 0 ] [ 2571 [ 31 01 ( 259 [ ; 3 ; TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES: YEAR WEST EAST NORTH SOUTH COUNT ( 0) ( 171) ( 819 } { 722 ) 2011 [ 0 ] [ 180 ] [ 862 } [ 760 ] 2016 ; 0 } ( 181 } 869 ; ; 766 } R: Employee Fo)ders\ROGERITRAFFlG.gpw, 11/09/10 - Fg �5��� ^m m� m8 ��w �� soave m ohm �m 8 o m A SQQ 11pp QQ mm ty '� a 3$33n n�i Fm m am$oi wv m p'�K uGa � yb gg n O�OON [[ NPbm SDy��N ry cb ryw OO �ry $0 g�Om ryf�' �S ii O ��� O p}` NS.-mS Qm ^$�a� o no PN O.$4$C $ �y��� SQQ �� tin$OO `G $� a ale aaa'$ RE gSy5L,.2 Qp?S Q� F $Se�en&pp� Fi V VVRnOF! Y�XAa��mj »> m F N eeVyO$n NN.•� 8M wmM1bm �N�he Cp� m OO Vp mN~%�m N� t�-$Rs2 �p NN pn OO ��Phew'f C w � m . �n Am9b NN �Nry ��tlOm N� mOmm Yi rv$ j Emn�N N. b ���n �fiRn ��� RRNP� 81 .. .. z,' N n99nR Q2 vve« AA AN 1.94.*9 pv A nvgg � v R,Sio'aio mm rvv'.2u�$ mQ "�v^,nuwi'� ro� �rmimioab"� a va<v m $ A;Z;;nm^P 22.899 ^n Sa_gmo �� w'$_^no P8 v w 5 a w € 3F`LL •Rn k F c w a i.' 3 :. a s mw s ✓3rti4: mg g P O Ogg m o o m m � o o w O p Q yy ge^`a r4 um o.`-n $" gdnFB og rr�� m m8�Xt c a r - r -0 jjjj pp�� --- � D NN SO r � p -- --- Q- �- �. p �p m--- r �c � Y� pp Q �p Hwy m$ 6m ^�SR$� 84 �2 8 mb $Z Xnng MZUPZ mg �s xr �m2ieB rye S`a$va w_. n m mo��a Tn �$ v cm8ss� ®® _ w _ sm vAa88 a e�w n ' aF vvffiRn g= vsabR a s"sSs a Samsa a< w��Pg Sm xa �m �� SV&Va % n a R�ssaS �8 :SR�tJ nS �ar�� SS CB��n �e Q Q,-mm and $ Nmme C Y m r a O m d Le b N -- -� O »mnpe2m N n- h � _w �-_ - r ww c o o n o o a a 0 S. 0 0 is 11 C fI Q0 Attachment 8 Intersection Capacity Analyses HCS+: Un knalized Intersections Relea. )5.4 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R. Dickinson Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 11/9/2010 Analysis Time Period: AM Build Intersection: 0urisdiction: South Burlington Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Project ID: 10081 East/West Street: Sphinx Development North/South Street: VT Route 116 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): --__----Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 f 4 5 6 L T R L T R 1.00 Volume 609 21 63 235 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 609 21 63 235 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No —Approach^---- Minor Street: Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R "'-- Volume 2 14— Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service________ NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 LT I LR 63 16 962 443 0.07 0.04 0.21 0.11 9.0 13.4 A B 13.4 B HCS+: Un Inalized intersections Relea. I5.4 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R. Dickinson Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 11/9/2010 Analysis Time Period: PM Build Intersection: Jurisdiction: South Burlington Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Project ID: 10081 East/West Street: Sphinx Development North/South Street: VT Route 116 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 349 4 20 560 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 349 4 20 560 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: —Approach westbound Eastbound -- -- Movement 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 L T R , L T R Volume_�.__.._.._.._._...__....,.�___ 19 — 58------.�—_.._—_ �_— Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 58 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Approach. Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service___ NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 LT LR 12 v (vph) 20 77 C (m) (vph) 1217 515 v/c 0.02 0.15 95% queue length 0.05 0.53 Control Delay 8.0 13.2 LOS A B Approach Delay 13.2 Approach LOS B 2016 AM Build 3: I nt Baseline 1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y T t Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.87 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd_ Flow (prot) 1545 1786 1719 1810 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.39 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1545 1786 710 1810 Volume (vph) 3 42 563 60 168 295 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 42 563 60 168 295 RTOR Reduction (vph) 39 0 7 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 6 0 616 0 168 295 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 0.6 12.5 12.5 12.5 Effective Green, g (s) 1.6 13.5 13.5 13.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.54 0.54 0.54 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 98 961 382 974 v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 c0.34 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 vie Ratio 0.06 0.64 0.44 0.30 Uniform Delay, dl 11.0 4A 3.5 3.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0A 1.1 0.3 0.1 Delay (s) 11.1 5.2 3.8 3.3 Level of Service B A A A Approach Delay (s) 11.1 5.2 3.5 Approach LOS B A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 4.7 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 25.1 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group Lamoureux & Dickinson 11/11/2010 P:12010\10081 1116 meadowland am.sy7 2016 AM Build 3:Int Baseline # I # # Lane Group WBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations y T I t Volume (vph) 3 563 168 295 Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 623 168 295 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phases 8 2 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14,0 14.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 Total Split (%) 31.7% 68.3% 68.3% 68.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None v/c Ratio 0.13 0.38 0.30 0.18 Control Delay 7.4 2.6 3.9 1.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.4 2.6 3.9 1.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 173 69 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2500 2478 2274 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 621 1669 570 1691 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spiliback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0,37 0.29 0.17 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 21.2 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Splits and Phases: 3: Int 31 m2 7,7, of ,� Lamoureux & Dickinson 11/11/2010 P:12010110081\116 meadowland am.sy7 2016 PM Build 3: Int Baseline t 7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y T+ ' t Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1572 1807 1719 1810 Fit Permitted 0.99 1.00 0.52 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1572 1807 947 1810 Volume (vph) 57 184 402 5 38 523 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 57 184 402 5 38 523 RTOR Reduction (vph) 144 0 1 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 97 0 406 0 38 523 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.0 10.9 10.9 10.9 Effective Green, g (s) 6.0 11.9 11.9 11.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.43 0.43 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 338 771 404 772 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.22 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.53 0.09 0.68 Uniform Delay, dl 9.2 5.9 4.8 6.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 02 0.3 0.0 1.9 Delay (s) 9.3 6.2 4.8 8.3 Level of Service A A A A Approach Delay (s) 9.3 6.2 8.1 Approach LOS A A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 7.7 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 27.9 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group Lamoureux & Dickinson 11/11/2010 P:120101100811116 meadowland pm.sy7 2016 PM Build 3: 1 nt Baseline Lane Group WBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations y T+ t Volume (vph) 57 402 38 523 Lane Group Flow (vph) 241 407 38 523 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phases 8 2 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 24.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 LeadiLag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None v/c Ratio 0.47 0.51 0.10 0.65 Control Delay 7.9 8.8 6.1 11.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.9 8.8 6.1 11.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 39 3 54 Queue Length 95th (ft) 72 133 17 189 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2500 2478 2274 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 802 1152 536 1154 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.35 0.07 0.45 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 30.7 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Splits and Phases: 3: Int Lamoureux & Dickinson 11/11/2010 P:120101100811116 meadowland pm.sy7 Attachment C Turn Lane Warrant Analyses LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS PROJECT #: 10081 PROJECT: Sphinx Development LOCATION: Hinesburg Road South Burlington YEAR: 2016 TIME: AM SPEED: 40 mph Exclusive right -turn lane in the Va direction (YIN)? Exclusive left -turn lane in the Vo direction (YIN)? ENTER TRAFFIC VOLUMES (vph): Vadv. Vopp. Left -Turn = 63 0 Thru = 235 609 Right -Turn - 0 21 Va = 298 vph Vo = 630 vph L = 21.1% p = 3.0% u = 788 vph Tw = 3.0 sec. Te = 1.9 sec. N N Va = ( 2,400"p"u / L'(1-L)" (Tw+Te) )^0.5 Warranting Va = 264 vph 298 > 264 THEREFORE, LEFT -TURN LANE IS WARRANTED REQUIRED LENGTH = 75 FEET BY: R. Dickinson P:lEmployee FolderslROGERILT-TURN.gpw 11/12/10, 8-34:04 AM LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS PROJECT #: 10081 PROJECT: Sphinx Development LOCATION: Hinesburg Road, Soutt, Buriington YEAR: 2016 TIME: PM SPEED: 40 mph Exclusive right -turn lane in the Va direction (Y/N)? Exclusive left -turn lane in the Vo direction (YIN)? ENTER TRAFFIC VOLUMES (vph) Vadv. Vopp. Left -Turn = 20 tt Thru = 560 349' Right -Turn = 0 Va = 580 vph Vo = 353 vph L = 3.4% p = 3.0% u = 957 vph Tw = 1.4 sec. Te = 1.9 sec. Va = ( 2,400*p*u / L*(1-L)*(Tw+Te) )"0.5 Warranting Va = 791 vph 580 < 791 BY: R, Dickinson THEREFORE, LEFT -TURN LANE NOT WARRANTED REQUIRED LENGTH = 0 FEET P:\Employee Folders\ROGER\LT-TURN.gpw 11/12/10, 8:34:56 AM LAMOUREUX f )CKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, IP RIGH1-TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS PROJECT #: 10081 PROJECT: Sphinx D eveloPment LOCATION: Hinesburg Read South Budingtc, i YEAR: 2016 TIME: AM SPEED: 45 mph ENTER TRAFFIC VOLUMES: RIGHT TURN = 2i vph THRU TRAFFIC = 809 vph TOTAL. VOLUME = 630 vph BY: R. Dickinson CHECKED BY: include left -turns if no excl. LT lane THEN R = RIGHT TURN / TOTAL VOLUME = 3.3% AND 33 ( (80 - SPEED) / (R(1-R) )"0.5 = 1,088 vph 630 < 1,088 THEREFORE, RIGHT TURN LANE NOT WARRANTED P:\Employee Folders\ROGER\RT-TURN.gpw 11/12/10, 8:38:03 AM LAMOUREUX % )CKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, I1• RIGH-t -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS PROJECT #: 1008 PROJECT: Sohinx Develoo?n&nt LOCATION: Fiinest;urp Road South Burlington YEAR: 2016 TIME: PM SPEED: 45 mph ENTER TRAFFIC VOLUMES: RIGHT TURN = w THRU TRAFFIC = 3 -19 TOTAL VOLUME = 353 BY: R. Dickinson CHECKED BY: vph vph include left -turns if no excl. LT lane vph THEN R = RIGHT TURN / TOTAL VOLUME = 1.1 % AND 33 " ((80 - SPEED) ! (R(1-R) )^0.5 = 1,845 vph 353 < 1,845 THEREFORE, RIGHT TURN LANE NOT WARRANTED P:\Employee Folders\ROGER\RT-TURN.gpw 11/12/10, 8:38:19 AM Subdivision Plat Application Permit Number SD- APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW X Preliminary n Final PUD Being Requested? X Yes ri No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Sphinx Development, LLC c/o Dr. Gamal Eltebbakh, 391 Hillspoint Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445. 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 1060 Hinesburg Road - Book 804 Pg 665. 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road - Book 806, Pg 24. 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Sphinx Development, LLC c/o Dr. Gamal Eltabbakh, 391 Hillspoint Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445. 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax David S. Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, 10 Mansfield View Lane, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Ph 864-2323 x310 F 864-2271 Email: dmarshall@cea-vt.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1060 (1.31 Acre) and 1070-80 (2.33 acre) Hinesburg Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) # 0860-106OR & 0860-107OR 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing). Removal of the existing single family and duplex residential buildings, consolidation of Lots 1 & 2 at 1060 and 1070-80 Hinesburg Road, an construction of a 40,261 GSF office building (50% being medical and 50% being general office use) with supporting parking and infrastructure improvements. 1 of 1 Subdivision Plat Application b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 1060 Hinesburg Road: Single family house on 1.31 acres; 1070-80 Hinesburg Road: Duplex located on 2.33 acres. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Consolidation of two lots into one 3.64 acre parcel to house a 40,261GSF office building with a 50/50 mix of medical office and general office. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 40,261 GSF for the primary building. The Porte cochere on the east side of the building was not used in computing the GSF of the building for use purposes. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Proposed first Floor Elev is 398.50 Height of Building from 1st Fir + 38.58 Top of Building Elevation: 437.08 Average existing grade is - 400.20 (See Attachment) Height of Building 36.88 The portion of the building that extends above the 35' building height limitation is primarily the top of the elevator shaft (1.88' above 35' max bldg height). The elevations of the building depict the view angle of the public from Hinesburg Road and it shows that the top of the elevator shaft will not be visible from the road surface or a future recreation path. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): NA g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 122 office employees with periodic visitors. No company vehicles envisioned. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): A 1.88 foot height waiver is requested as well an 8 space parking waiver as it applies to the general office use component of the building. This property is not subject to any Overlay Districts. The property is subject to a 50' front yard setback from the proposed Hinesburg Road right-of-way width of 80 feet yielding a 57' setback from the existing right-of-way. The north parcel is currently encumbered by a 20' wide pedestrian easement on the west side and a 20' wide sewer easement on the east side in favor of the City of South Burlington . The south property is encumbered by a 20' wide sewer easement along the south side of the parcel in favor of the City of South Burlington i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot 2 of 2 Subdivision Plat Application mergers, etc. Consolidation of Lots 1 and 1 into one 3.64 acre lot. 9. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 3.64 Acres (158,494 SF) b. Building Coverage: Existing: 5,246 square feet: 3.3 % Proposed: 13,491 square feet 8.5 % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing: 11,925 square feet: 7.5 % Proposed: 78,070 square feet 49.3 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only). - Existing: 4,292 square feet: 23.0 % Proposed: 1,780 square feet 9.5 % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? ❑ Yes X No Jeff Severson, a wetland ecologist, has visited the site and did not identify any wetlands on the property. Please see attached correspondence from him. b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) If yes, please submit the following with this application: NA 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. NA 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) NA 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 3.8 Acres (>160,000 SQ. FT.) *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. The applicant has received authorization fro coverage under GP 9020 from the VT DEC. 3 of 3 Subdivision Plat Application 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 4,000,000 b. Landscaping: $ 88,068 (Required $47,500 [250,000 x.03 + $250,000 x 0.02 + 3,500,000 x 0.01]) Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) Attached with cover letter c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) Site Prep = $ 72,000 Roads & Parking = $ 410,000 Utilities = $ 45,000 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 975 VPD b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 100 VPH c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 101 VPH 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8 AM to 5 PM 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Winter 2011 16. PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach on a separate sheet. NAME MAILING ADDRESS WITH ZIP CODE PARCEL ID Avalanche Development, LLC, 35 Dorset Lane, Williston, VT 05495 0860-1050 Spaniel Properties, LLC, 1050 Hinesburg Road, Unit A, South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-1050 East Mountain View, LLC, 1100 Hinesburg Road, Suite 201, South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01 100 Burlington Properties, LTD, PO Box 0210, South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-1020 Jim Doucevicz & Al Senecal, c/o Doucevicz Development, Carmichael Street, Essex, VT 05451 0860-1075 4 of 4 Subdivision Plat Application Subdivision Plat Application DATE OF SUBMISSION: have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: omplete,.� I complete irector of Planning & Zoning or Designee /D9te 6 of 6 Subdivision Plat Application Subdivision Plat Application EXHIBIT A PRELIMINARY PLAT The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred). On the Survey Plat Sheet P-1 o Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared. On the Survey Plat Sheet P-1 o Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.) On the Survey Plat Sheet P-1, This property is not encumbered by any 100-yr or 500-yr flood limits. o Location of easements, public lands, r.o.w.s, sidewalks, and public or private street (w/names) On the Survey Plat Sheet P-1 o Five foot contours (existing and finished) See Sheet C2 o Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. See Sheet C2 o Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks, and other public opens spaces. See Sheet C2 o Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. All Sheets o Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative water supply. See Sheet C2 o Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. See Sheet C2 o Details of storm water facilities in the form of a drainage plan. See Sheet C2 o Details of all proposed bridges or culverts. See Sheet C2 o Location of temporary markers. See Sheet C4 (benchmark) o All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions. On the Survey Plat Sheet P-1 (in the form of easements) o A list of waivers desired (if any). See Section 7 (h). o Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates). Start Date — Spring 2011. Completion Winter 2011/12. o A report addressing planned residential/unit development criteria of the Zoning Regulations. NA o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size). Please see Landscaping Plan o Location of abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping - See Sheet C4 o Number and location of parking spaces ( see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations) See Sheet C1 o Number and location of handicapped spaces (see Section 26.253(a) of the Zoning Regulations) See Sheet C1 o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard See Sheet C1 7of7 Subdivision Plat Application o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded. Attached with Application Cover Letter o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened), See Sheet C2 o Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. See Sheet C1 o If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats NA APPLICATION FEE Please call the Planning & Zoning office for fee information. 802-846-4106 8 of 8 Page 1 of 1 Matt Wamsganz From: French, Timothy [Timothy. French@state. A us] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 1:51 PM To: 'Matthew J. Wamsganz' Subject: Proposed Office Building VT 116 Good Afternoon Matt, I wanted to send you a quick note in regards to the combining of the two access and proposed left turn lane. The Agency has reviewed preliminary plans Alt A and Alt B and has chosen Alt B which is shown below. The Agency agrees with the City of South Burlington in regards to combining accesses for safety reasons whenever we can. In this particular situation it becomes very difficult to design and build the left turn lane and combine the accesses because of the close proximity of the existing Meadow Land Drive. The Agency has reviewed the site and the plans proposed and do not recommend combining these two accesses at the originally proposed access location. The Agency hasn't received a formal application to the proposed Alt B at this time. Thanks, Tim a x f G 2 I T I 1 i � r. U U I l U 11 I Timothy B. French Utilities and Permits Unit Project Supervisor for Maintenance District 5 Vermont Agency of Transportation Program Development Division - Utilities and Permits Unit One National Life Drive Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 Telephone (802) 828-2487 Cell (802) 224-6593 Fax (802) 828-5742 mailtotimothv.french®state vt us 2/2/2011 Page 1 of 1 Dave Marshall From: Jeffrey Severson [Jeff.severson@burlingtontelecom.net] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 10:01 AM To: Dave Marshall Cc: Matthew J. Wamsganz Subject: Wetland evaluation for Sphinx Development PUD project Dave, On November 17, 2010 1 visited the proposed PUD site located at 1060 Hinesburg Road and 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road in South Burlington, Vermont to determine if wetlands are located on these parcels. I did not find any wetlands at the site. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or require any additional information. Best regards, Jeff Jeffrey Severson Principal Ecologist Oakledge Environmental Services, Inc. P.O. Box 4065 Burlington, VT 05406 802-660-8312 jell.severson@burlingtontelecom.net 1 /30/2011 `�VERMONT. Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street, Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 October 19, 2010 Sphinx Development, LLC Gamal Eltabbakh 391 Hillspoint Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Construction General Permit 3-9020 (Amended 2008) Authorization of Notice of Intent #_6499-9020 Sphinx Development Dear Mr. Eltabbakh, Agency of Natural Resources [phone] 802-241-3770 [fax] 802-241-3287 Notice of Intent # 6499-9020 for the discharge of stormwater from the construction activities associated with Sphinx Development described in the Notice of Intent you submitted has been authorized. Enclosed are four documents that you will need to maintain compliance with this authorization. 1. Authorized Notice of Intent (NOI) The authorized NOI for Low Risk Projects is valid for two years from the date of the authorization. If the project will proceed past the automatic termination date, you must reapply for coverage under this or another construction stormwater permit before that time. 2. Notice of Authorization for Posting The notice of Authorization, which details the authorization and conditions you selected in completion of Appendix A to the CGP, must be posted in a location visible to the public in accordance with Subpart 4.5.0 of the CGP. In accordance with subpart 5.1 of the CGP, the project risk score must be re-evaluated prior to any major changes to the construction plan. Low Risk Site Handbook for Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Please provide the Principal Operator with the low risk site handbook. This handbook details the practices that must be implemented throughout the construction project to prevent erosion and the discharge of sediment from the construction site. Some practices must be in place before construction begins, so please review the entire handbook before starting the project. 4. Notice of Addition of Co-Permittee This form must be submitted for every new landowner or principal operator who joins the project, in accordance with Subpart 7.2 of the CGP. To preserve, enhance, restore, and conserve Vermont's natural resources, and protect human health, for the benefit of this and future generations. The CGP, copies of blank forms, and an electronic version of the Low Risk Handbook are available on the stormwater website: http://www.vtwaterquality.org/stonnwater/htm/sw cgp.htm. If you have any questions related to this permit authorization, please contact the Stormwater Section at 802-241-3779 or email stormwater@state.vt.us. Sincerely, Heather Mack Administrative Assistant Stormwater Program Cc Matthew Wamsganz, Civil Engineering Assoc, 10 Mansfield View Lane, South Burlington, VT 05403 Notice of Intent (NOI) for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity on Low Risk Sites Under Vermont Construction General Permit 3-9020 For Department Use: NOI Number: �MQq --'�OaQ VFRMa�J ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Submission of this completed Notice of Intent (NOI) constitutes notice that the entity in Section A intends to be authorized to discharge pollutants to waters of the State, from the project identified in Section B, under Vermont's Stormwater Construction General Permit (CGP). Submission of the NOI also constitutes notice that the party identified in Section A of this form has read, understands, and meets the eligibility conditions of the CGP and has determined that the project qualifies for coverage as a Low Risk project in conformance with Appendix A of the CGP; agrees to comply with all applicable terms and conditions of the CGP; understands that continued authorization under the CGP is contingent on maintaining eligibility for coverage, and that the applicable practices in the Low Risk Site Handbook for Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control must be implemented and maintained for the duration of the construction activities. In order to be granted coverage, all informatioD-requife this form must be provided. �F'inI " I C:7, A. Landowner Information �u IU I 1.Name: Sphinx Development, LLC c/o Gamal Eltabbakh D1�� ' 2. Mailing Address: a. Street/PO Box: 391 Hillspoint Road Sri ^I�VIRONn4= �;P- VVIVISI ` b. City/Town: Charlotte c. State: Vermont r IWtVd�)Z.01544�5+ISiCi `� 3. Contact Information a. Phone: 802-425-3385 b. Fax: c. Email: geltabbakhOlcgo.com B. Principal Operator Information (if known) 1.Name: Sphinx Development, LLC c/o Gamal Eltabbakh 2. Mailing Address: a. Street/PO Box: 391 Hillspoint Road b. City/Town: Charlotte c. State: Vermont d. Zip: 05445 3. Contact Information a. Phone: 802-425-3385 b. Fax: c. Email: geltabbakh@)icgo.com C. Project Information 1. Project Name -.Sphinx Development, 2. Part of Common Plan of Development?: ❑ Yes ZI No LLC 3. If Yes, Name of Development: 4. Location Address a. Street: 1060, 1070 & 1080 VT Route 116 b. City/ Town: South Burlington c. Latitude: 44' 26' 28" d. Longitude -73*09 '25" (at or near center of the project) 5. Project Type: ❑Residential ® Commercial ❑ Industrial Public ❑Other: 6. Description of construction activities to be permitted: Construction of a Medical Office Building with associated parking and utilities. 7. Total Area of Disturbance: 3.36 acres 8. Proposed Start Date: 4/1/11 Proposed End Date: 1011/11 9. Has a Topographic Map showing the project boundary been included?* ® Yes ❑ No 10. Name(s) of receiving waters: Potash Brook See Filing Directions for Low Risk Projects Page 1 of 3 Feb 08 D. Certification Relating to the Accuracy of the Information Submitted I hereby certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. I also certify that the applicable practices in the Low Risk Site Handbook for Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control will be implemented for the duration of the project for which this NO] is submitted. Landowner Name: Signature: Dater f C� E. Public Notice R quirement You must provide a copy of this completed NO] form to the municipal clerk for posting in the municipality in which the discharge is to be located. If the project and the related discharge(s) are located in different municipalities, then the completed NOI shall be filed with the municipal clerk in each municipality. For Department Use Only: VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE A determination has been made that the proposed construction activities qualify for coverage under General Permit 3-9020 (amended 2008) as a Low Risk project. Subject to the conditions of General Permit No. 3-9020 (amended 2008), the applicant is hereby authorized to dischar e stormwater runoff from a construction site as described in this Notice of Intent Number -9020. Dated at Waterbury, Vermont this _l day of Oe-,bye 20 10 Justin G. Johnson, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By P'TPLadrMonks Program Manager, Stormwater Section Page 2 of 3 E PUBLIC COMMENT Public comments concerning this Notice of Intent to discharge under General Permit No 3-9020 are invited and must be submitted within 10 days of receipt of this Notice by the Municipal Clerk. Comments should address how the application complies or does not comply with the terms and conditions of General Permit No. 3-9020. A letter of interest should be filed by those persons who elect not to file comments but who wish to be notified if the comment period is extended or reopened for any reason. All written comments received within the time frame described above will be considered by the Department of Environmental Conservation in its final ruling to grant or deny authorization to discharge under General Permit No. 3-9020. Send written comments to: VT Depardnent of Environmental Conservation Water Quality Division, Stormwater Section 103 South Main Street, Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 Please cite the NOI number in any correspondence. APPEALS Pursuant to 10 V.S.A..Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Envirorunental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontiudiciary.orp,. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660) A copy of General Permit No. 3-9020 may be obtained by calling (802) 241-3770; by visiting the Department at the above address between the hours of 7:45 am and 4:30 pm; or by downloading from the Water Quality Division's Web site at www.vtwaterquality.org. INFORMATION FOR MUNICIPAL CLERK: Title 10 Chapter 47 §1263(b) provides for the public notice of an applicant's intent to discharge stormwater runoff associated with construction activity. Please post this notice and instruction sheet in a conspicuous place for 10 days from the date received. If you have any questions, contact the Water Quality Division of the Department of Environmental Conservation at (802) 241-3771. Please date this below as to when it was posted. Thank you for your assistance. DATE OF POSTING:_/fT`�1��©�•°� Submit Original Form to: VT DEC, Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street, Bldg 10 North Waterbury, VT, 05671 Page 3 of 3 Notice of Authorization Under Vermont Construction General Permit 3-9020 I: 1 r%ui Rich Prnicrfc . 11HNOV ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Project Name: Sphinx Development Notice of Intent Number: 6499-9020 Permittee Name: Sphinx Development, LLC Date of Authorization: 10/19/2010 Date of Expiration: 10/19/2012 . The project listed above has received authorization under General Permit 3-9020 to discharge stormwater from the following construction activities: Construction of a medical office buildings with associated parking and utilities. This authorization includes the following requirements: 1. Implementation of erosion prevention and sediment control practices required by the Low Risk Site Handbook for Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control. 2. All areas of disturbance must have temporary or final stabilization within 7 days of the initial disturbance. After this time, any disturbance in the area must be stabilized at the end of each work day. The following exceptions apply: a. Stabilization is not required if work is to continue in the area within the next 24 hours and there is no precipitation forecast for the next 24 hours. b. Stabilization is not required if the work is occurring in a self-contained excavation (i.e. no outlet) with a depth of 2 feet or greater (e.g. house foundation excavation, utility trenches). 3. No more than 5 acres of land may be disturbed at any one time. 4. All Discharges of Stormwater must pass through at least 50 ft of vegetated buffer before reaching receiving waters. 5. No disturbance shall occur within 50 ft upslope of any stream or river, or 100 ft of any lake or pond (except disturbance for the installation of Stormwater treatment facilities or road Stream crossing with no reasonable alternative location) 6. Inspections shall be conducted at least once every (7) calendar days and within twenty-four (24) hours of the end of a storm event resulting in discharge of Stormwater from construction site. 7. If there is a discharge of visibly discolored Stormwater from the construction site or from the Construction site to waters of the State, the permittee shall take immediate corrective action. 8. If, after completing corrective action, there continues to be a discharge of sediment from the construction site to waters of the State, the permittee shall notify DEC by submitting a report within 72 hours of the discharge. To request information on this authorization, or to report compliance concerns, please contact the Water Quality Division at (802) 241-3770 or write to: VT DEC, Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street, Bldg 10 North Waterbury, VT, 05671 See reverse for posting requirements Permittee Directions for Posting: This notice shall be placed near the construction entrance at a location visible to the public. If displaying near the main entrance is infeasible, the notice shall be posted in a local public building such as the town hall or public library. For linear projects, the notice shall be posted at a publicly accessible location near the active part of the construction project (e.g., where a pipeline project crosses a public road). Page 1 of 3 Dave Marshall From: Dave Marshall [dmarshal l@cea-vt.com] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 9:43 AM To: 'Doug Brent' Cc: 'Cathyann LaRose'; 'Rick Aldrich' Subject: RE: Proposed Office Building - 1060 Hinesburg Road Chief - Thank you for your input. This is helpful in getting us going in the right direction. We recognize that these comments do not represent your formal comments on the project (which will be based on the formal preliminary plan application set). Again, Thank you for your time on this. Best David S. Marshall, P.E Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 P 802-864-2323 x310 F 864-2271 From: Doug Brent [mailto:dbrent@sburl.com] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 3:09 PM To: dmarshall@cea-vt.com Subject: RE: Proposed Office Building - 1060 Hinesburg Road Dave - I got the plans which you dropped off with Linda. I will formally review this project once the plans are submitted to P and Z. As you know there have been instances where plans I looked at with the project managers were not the same as the one's submitted to the office or to the DRB. My cursory review/look says: 1- At least one other hydrant will need to be added, somewhere in the rear of the building. The location of the present hydrant unfortunately makes on -scene operations difficult, as soon as we hook up to the FDC to support the sprinkler system, the entire access road is blocked by hose and we can no longer get additional fire apparatus into the scene. 2 - Our tallest travel height for trucks is 11' 10", so your suggested height should be an absolute minimum. 3 - The other usuals, sprinklers, alarm system, key boxes, elevator size, perhaps standpipes, plans review by Vt Division of Fire, AHJ location approval for alarm panel, FDC. Let me know if you have any questions or still have the need to meet. Doug Brent Chief of Fire and EMS From: Dave Marshall [mailto:dmarshall@cea-vt.com] Sent: Wed 11/17/2010 4:24 PM 1 /30/2011 Page 2 of 3 To: Doug Brent Subject: RE: Proposed Office Building - 1060 Hinesburg Road Chief - We plan on submitting a combined Preliminary/Final Plat application by December 3rd. Primarily, we wanted to make sure that you were comfortable with the circulation pattern on the site. An existing hydrant is located just south of the SW corner of the property near the proposed entrance. Water service will be extended from the main on Hinesburg Road to the southwest corner of the building. There is a proposed port-cochere on the east side of the building with clear heights that range from 12'-6" at the curb line near the building to 14' at the far east end. We wanted to make sure that there were- 1 . No issues with ambulances accessing the drive under the port-cochere; and 2. whether you needed to bring your equipment into this area and if so what vertical clearances you needed. The building will be sprinklered and will be outfitted with an elevator of suitable size to handle an ambulance stretcher. The proposed building footprint is 13,500 SF with a total GSF of 40,000 over three floors. Two to two and one-half stories on the west (Hinesburg Road) side and three stories on the east side. The proposed building use is 50% medical office and 50% general office. Thanks for absorbing this without the benefit of the hard copies. Best David S. Marshall, P.E Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 P 802-864-2323 x310 F 864-2271 From: Doug Brent [mailto:dbrent@sburl.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:30 PM To: dmarshall@cea-vt.com Subject: RE: Proposed Office Building - 1060 Hinesburg Road Dave - What are your timeframes? Let me know, next week is a short week with the holiday. Are you at sketch, prelim or final?. Thanks Doug Brent 1 /30/2011 Page 3 of 3 From: Dave Marshall [mailto:dmarshall@cea-vt.com] Sent: Wed 11/17/2010 1:10 PM To: Doug Brent Cc: Cathyann LaRose; 'Rick Aldrich'; matt@cea-vt.com Subject: Proposed Office Building - 1060 Hinesburg Road Chief - The City Development Review Board has asked that we get your review comments concerning the proposed office project located at 1060 Hinesburg Road (north of Vt Eye Laser where two existing homes now exist). Attached for your review on the screen is a PDF of the site plan. We will also forward you a hard copy for your desk along with the elevations and floor plan of the building. Is there a time we could meet with you to present the project and any answer any questions? Best David S. Marshall, P.E Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 P 802-864-2323 x310 F 864-2271 1 /3 0/20 l l Sphinx Development LLC Office Building Average Existing Grade Computation Elev Elev Avg. Length 406.9 398.7 402.8 72 29297 398.7 395.4 397.1 78 31099 395.4 396.9 396.2 20 7908 396.9 396.8 397.2 13 5160 396.8 397.5 397.2 8 3174 397.5 397.8 397.7 20 7950 397.8 395.8 396.8 28 11138 395.8 395.6 395.7 78 30872 395.6 404 399.8 72 28483 404 403.4 403.7 86 34744 403.4 401.3 402.4 19 7665 401.3 400.3 400.8 25 10033 400.3 402 401.2 19 7606 402 406.9 404.5 86 34572 Existing Average Grade 400.2 624 249700 First Floor Elevation 398.5 Roof Height 435.2 Total Height Above 35.0 (Main Building) Average Existing Grade (Max. = 35.0') "Waiver requested for small elevator shaft area which is 1.88' above roof and located in the center of the building. Sphinx Development Office Project Lot and Building Coverage Parking Lot Green Space Coverage 2-Feb-11 158,494 Lot Square Footage ` 64 Lot Acreage 13,491 Building Area 63,400 Main Parking Lot Total Area -409 Island 1 -194 Island 2 -195 Island 3 -195 Island 4 -251 Island 5 -106 Island 6 -1,134 Island 7 -1,411 Island 8 -630 Island 9 -459 Island 10 -459 Island 11 -907 Island 12 -307 Island 13 2,020 South Entrance Transformer and Dumpster Pad 229 Dumpster Pad & Chiller Pad 144 0 Porte Cochere Overhang 548 Porte Cochere Concrete Entry 342 West Side Egress Walk 2,721 Shared Entrance 955 North Sidewalk 1,021 South Sidewalk 78,070 Total Lot Coverage (so 49.26% Total Lot Coverage 8.51% Total Building Coverage 6,657 Landscape Islands in Main Parking Area (sf) 10.51% Landscape Islands in Main Parking Area Chiller Pad Transformer 60 25 IdM LIGHTING AFL10 Architectural Floodlights revision 10/1/08 • aflt0.pdf Type: F1 Fixture Options: Approvals: .lob: Sphinx Development, LLC GL4/DB Fixture Catalog number: Ordered Separately from Fixture See pages 4-5 AFL15/ 150PMH120 / DB / HDS / Mounting Options: SM2/BL Fixture Electrical Module Finish Optional Heavy Optional Duty Swivel Photocell See page 2 I 1 See page 3 -J Date: 2/1 /11 Ordered Separately from Fixture See eSepar y pages Ordered assembled with fixture. Page: 1 of 13 Specifications Dimensions AFL10 Models 70 to 150 watt H I D Medium Base Lamps with STANDARD SWIVEL Maximum weight: 24 lb 63/4" 14" (171.5 mm) (355.6 mm) 103/8" 10" Max.(254.0 mm) ° (263.5"m) 9" 6'/e" at max. (22I6 mm) (155.6 mm) 8 L back tilt 15/8" 1" '/2"(12.7mm) (41.3 mm) (25.4 mm) NPSM SIDE FRONT 01 Vertical 350 AIMING RANGE 125° May be limited by selected mounting option as shown on pages 6-10 with OPTIONAL HEAVY DUTY SWIVEL Maximum weight: 25 lb 63/4" 14" (171.5 mm) (355.6 mm) 01F,/16 (277.8 mmmm ) (228.6 mm) \ , 14" Max. (355.6 mm) �\ 8%8" at max. T— O (225.4 mm) 51/2" 5Ya" back tilt LU (139.7 mm) (133.4 mm) Slips over 2" pipe -size tenon (50.8 mm)/ (23/8" O.D. (60.3 mm) x 31/2" min. (88.9 mm) length) SIDE FRONT 00 Vertical 55° I \ AIMING RANGE I/ 1450 May be limited by selected R�� mounting option shown on pages 10-13 Housing: One-piece die-cast, low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum in a cylindrical shape with integral cooling fins over the entire length, and '/8" minimum wall thickness. One-piece silicone gasket between housing and door frame concealed when fixture is closed. Concealed integral cast slip hinges with stainless steel pins. Door Frame: One-piece die-cast, low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum with integral cooling fins, 1/8" minimum wall thickness, mates with housing to create a continuous cylindrical shape. Concealed integral cast slip hinges allow removal without tools. Stop -arm provided to limit door frame opening. 3/16"thick clear tempered glass lens is sealed to the lens frame by a one-piece silicone gasket. Door frame secures to housing by four stainless steel recessed captive allen-head screws. Four tapped and plugged holes provided for attachment of options. Standard Swivel: Die-cast aluminum with integral locking teeth providing 50 adjustment intervals. Stainless steel allen-head locking screw and 1/2" NPSM. Clear anodized prior to chromate conversion coating for added corrosion resistance. Reflector Assemblies: Interchangeable in all seven AFL10 models. Specular Alzak® aluminum optical components mounted to aluminum frame. Reflector assembly snaps into fixture housing with spring clips. Sockets are 4KV porcelain medium base. (G-12 socket available for T-6 bi-pin 70 and 150 watt Pulse Start Metal Halide lamps. Consult factory.) Electrical Components: All electrical components are UL and CSA recognized with leads extending out of the swivel. High power factor ballast rated -40°F starting for HPS and -20°F for PMH lamp modes. Optional photocell mounted with sensor on side of housing. Finish: Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness, applied over a titanated zirconium conversion coating; 2500 hour salt spray test endurance rating. Standard colors are Black, Dark Bronze, Light Gray, Stealth Gray", Platinum Silver or White. Custom colors are available and subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and longer lead times. Consult representative. CAUTION: Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with national, state, and/or local electrical codes. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. HUBBELL - ''189� HUBBELL LIGHTING, INC. I Listings and Ratings UL cUL 1598' CE I IP67 Rated I 25C Ambient 'Suitable for wet locations. KIM LIGHTING RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE SPECIFICATIONS WITHOU © 2008 KIM LIGHTING INC. - P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 - TEL: 626/968-5666 - FAX: 626/369-2695 5607008275 IdM LIGHTING Type: Job: Fixture Cat. No. designates AFL10 fixture and beam pattern. Single fixture EPA with standard swivel: 0.7 (45° tilt) 1.0 (Face on) Electrical Module: HIPS = High Pressure Sodium PMH = Pulse Start Metal Halide Lamp Lamp Line Watts Type Volts 150 HPS 277 AFL10 Architectural Floodlights revision 10/1 /08 • afll O.pdf Page: 2 of 13 Standard Features Beam Pattern: Wide Flood Vertical Flood Medium Flood Narrow Flood Cat. No.: ❑ AFL11 ❑ AFL12 1 AFL13 ❑ AFL14 l � Beam Pattern: Spot Narrow Spot Horizontal Spot Cat. No.: W AFL15 ❑ AFL16 1 1 AFL17 Cat. Nos. for Electrical Modules available: ❑ 70HPS120 ❑ 100HPS120 ❑ 150HPS120 0 70HPS208 ❑ 1001-1PS208 ❑ 150HPS208 ❑ 70HPS240 ❑ 100HPS240 171150HPS240 ❑ 70HPS277 ❑ 100HPS277 11150HPS277 ❑ 70HPS347 ❑ 100HPS347 L 150HPS347 ❑ 70HPS480 ❑ 100HPS480 ❑ 150HPS480 Lam ED-17 Clear ED-17 Clear ED-17 Clear Socket Medium Base Medium Base Medium Base ANSI Ballast S-62 S-54 S-55 ❑ 70PMH120 ❑ 100PMH120 W 150PMH120 70PMH2O8 ❑ 10OPMH2O8 ❑ 150PMH2O8 1 170PMH240 ❑ 100PMH240 ❑ 150PMH240 ❑ 70PMH277 ❑ 100PMH277 ❑ 150PMH277 ❑ 70PMH347 ❑ 100PMH347 ❑ 150PMH347 ❑ 70PMH480 ❑ 10OPMH480 ❑ 150PMH480 Lam ED-17 Clear T-6 Clear, ED-17 Clear ED-17 Clear T-6 Clear, Socket Medium Base G12 Base' Medium Base Medium Base G12 Base' ANSI Ballast M-98 M-90 M-102 'See Options for - 70W PMH and 150W PMH -T6 lamp with GI Base selection. NOTE: Due to the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, Kim Lighting can no longer supply probe start metal halide ballasts with its luminaires, effective January 1, 2009. Contact Kim Lighting for availability of replacement ballasts for warranty service claims. (Visit www.abodightingcontrols.org or the Library of Congress website for more details). Finish Color: Black Dark Bronze Light Gray Stealth Gray' Platinum Silver White Custom Color' Super TGIC powder coat Cat. No.: ❑ BL JDB ❑ LG ❑ SG ❑ PS ❑WH ❑ CC Paint over a titanated zirconium conversion 'Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. coating. Consult representative. Custom color description: 0 2008 KIM LIGHTING INC. • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5607008275 AFL10 Architectural Floodlights IaM LIGHTING revision 10/1/08 • af110.pdf Type: Job: Page: 3 of 13 Optional Features Ordered Assembled with Fixture Heavy Duty Swivel Cast low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum with locking teeth Cat. No. �( HDS providing 5° adjustment intervals. W stainless steel locking „ 7 /' C.1 No Option bolt. Two 3/8' stainless steel set point screws secure swivel to P (,9 5 mm) any 2' pipe -size tenon (23/8' O.D. x 31/2' min. length). Clear Single fixture EPA with anodized prior to chromate conversion coating for added JI heavy duty swivel: corrosion resistance. 0.8 (450 tilt) CAUTION: Recommended for vandal resistant 2'/e" 23'8„ (73.0 mm) (73.0 mm) 1.1 (Face on) requirements. Photocell Factory installed with flush sensor on side of housing. Select Cat. No. (see right) photocell with same line volts as fixture. CI No Option CAUTION: Use only in locations where adjacent lighting 0 1;Z will not affect operation of photocell. Cat. No. Line Volts 11 A-30 120V 1 A-33 277V Photocell Sensor ❑ A-31 208V l l A-34 480V ❑ A-32 240V f l A-35 347V © 2008 KIM LIGHTING INC. • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5607008275 IdM LIGHTING It Type: Job: Fixture Options Ordered Separately from Fixture AFL10 Architectural Floodlights revision 10/1/08 • af110.pdf Page: 4 of 13 G12 Socket Optional G12 base socket available for 70W and 15OW Pulse Start Metal Halide lamp only, T-6 Cat. No. ❑ G12 Bipin configuration. Must use UV filtering lamp. Consult factory. ❑ No Option Barn Doors Extruded aluminum doors with anti -reflection baffles. Each Cat. No. (see right) door is hinged to a cast, low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum 43/8'(111.1 mm) El No Option frame, and locks by set screws. Doors are individually r TYPICAL removable. Barn Door assembly mounts to predrilled door frame holes. CAUTION: Not recommended for ground mounted fixtures CY in vandal prone areas. Cat. No. Finish: Cat. No. Finish: ❑ BDBL Black ❑ BD/DB Dark Bronze ❑ BD/LG Light Gray ❑ BD/PS Platinum Silver ❑ BD/SG Stealth Gray" ❑ BD/WH White Fixed Hood Formed 1/16" thick aluminum. Mounts to predrilled door 14" Cat. No. (see right) frame holes. Can be mounted along the top or bottom of the fixture p fixtto shield the lamand lens from view. (355.6 mm) s 1 NO Option (tot mm) Cat. No. Finish: Cat. No. Finish: —r ❑ FHBL Black C 1 FH/DB Dark Bronze (196.9 mm) ❑ FH/LG Light Gray I I FH/PS Platinum Silver C] FH/SG Stealth Gray" I I FH/WH White Full Shield Formed 1/16" thick aluminum. Mounts to predrilled door Cat. No. (see right) frame holes. ❑ No Option CAUTION: Do not use full shield in locations where leaves and trash can collect inside shield. (355.6mm) Cat. No. Finish: Cat. No. Finish: ❑ FSBL Black ❑ FS/DB Dark Bronze ❑ FS/LG Light Gray ❑ FS/PS Platinum Silver ❑ FS/SG Stealth Gray' ❑ FS/WH White Grid Louver for AFL15 Formed 1/16" thick aluminum. Mounts to predrilled door and AFL16 frame holes. Provides glare control for AFL15 and AFL16 14" Cat. No. (see right) Spots while maintaining beam efficiency and uniformity. F(355.6mm) No Option NOTE: For use with AFL15 and AFL16 only. (,01 s mm) Cat. No. Finish: Cat. No. Finish: r" 3/4 [IGL4/BL Black m GL4/DB Dark Bronze (1 69mm) ❑ GL4/LG Light Gray ❑ GL41PS Platinum Silver ❑ GL4/SG Stealth Gray" ❑ GL4/WH White Lexan® Lens Shield 3/16" thick, clear convex, vacuum formed, advanced polymer 133/4" Cat. No. ❑AFL-LS (Lexan®) lens shield with gasket. Mounts over lens to 7-/_(349.3mm)� /8'CD ❑ No Option predrilled door frame holes and may be used with BD Barn (187, oor, FH Fixed Hood, or FS Full Shield option. _ CAUTION: Use only when vandalism is anticipated. NOTE: Not for use with GL4 Louver or CFA1 color fi lter options. 31/2" (88.9 mm) © 2008 KIM LIGHTING INC. • P.O BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5607008275 wM ucFrriNc Type: F1 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC MountingOrdered Separately from Fixture I AFL10 Architectural Floodlights revision 10/1/08 • afllo.pdf Page: 11 of 13 Reference symbol for fixture aiming range when mounted on the option as shown. This range is in the vertical plane and does not necessarily apply to all conditions. See page 1 for full aiming range without mounting options. Stanchion Mount Tenon 2"Tenon - For Optional Heavy Duty Swivel Mount Only. Cat. No. m SM21BL ❑ No Option Wall Mount Tenon 2"Tenon - For Optional Heavy Duty Swivel Mount Only. Cat. No. (see right) ❑ No Option Component EPA: 0.3 4" O.D. cast low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum stanchion with 2" pipe -size tenon (23/8" O.D., 13W I.D.) for mounting a single fixture or multiple top -mounts. Black finish. CAUTION: Multiple top -mounts must not be used in locations where people can climb on fixtures and mounting arms. To assure a rigid installation, stanchion must be set in concrete (by others). 2" pipe -size tenon (23/8" O.D., 2" I.D.) welded to an extruded aluminum arm with a removable end cap for wiring access. Arm is welded to a cast aluminum plate with two 1/2" mounting holes. NOTE: Not for use with PT2 option. Cat. No. Finish: ❑ WM21BL Black ❑ WM2/DB Dark Bronze ❑ WM2/LG Light Gray ❑ WM2/SG Stealth Gray" f 1 WM2/PS Platinum Silver 1 WM2/WH White � WEB 41/4" Optional Wall Embedment (108.0mm) Bracket (WEB) provides 3/e-16 10 4" bolt receptacles welded in a (260.4mm) galvanized re -bar cage for casting into poured -in -place concrete walls. Bolt receptacles 53/i6 (131.8mm) receive fixture attachment bolts. 2" Pipe -Size Tenon (50.8 mm) 41/2" (114.33mmm) 131/2' (342.9 mm)l 0 0. r I.D. 3Y2" J (88.9 mm) 4" DIA. (101.6 mm) 1 " MIN, (25.4 mm) 71/2" MAX. (190.5 mm) 11 OK 2" Pipe -Size Tenon (5o.8 mm) `' 31 4" 121/4" \(101.6mm) (311.2 mm) ® \ 7" m (177.8 mm) 163/16" (411.2 mm) © 2008 KIM LIGHTING INC. • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 560 /0082/b Type: B3 .lob: Sphinx Development, LLC Catalog number: GEM1 / 30LED120 / DB / HS Fixture Electrical Module Top Cap Finish Optional Houseside Shield (Includes top cap and shaft) — Seepage 2 — Specifications GEM'" Models 70 to 100 watt H I D Medium Base Lamps 32 watt Compact Fluorescent 30 to 60 LED GEM1 Maximum weight: 28 lb 5' (127.0 mm) 371/2' LIGHT CENTER HEIGHT (952.5 mm) 8' DIA.- (203.2 mm) 91/2' DIA. (241.3 mm) 91/2' (241.3 mm) 421/2'" (1079.5 mm) *30'OR 36' OVERALL HEIGHT AVAILABLE - CONTACT KIM REPRESENTATIVE (271h'ABSOLUTE MINIMUM) • ii • �� • n 1 1/2' ANCHOR BOLT PROJECTION (38.1 MM) BASE PLAN GEM ALUMINUM SHAFT 8' DIA. (203.2 mm) O B 0 3 3/4' CONDUIT OPENING (95.3 mm) 5' BOLT CIRCLE DIA. (127.0 mm) HUBBELL Hueseu. LIGHTING.— U.S. PATENT D443,094 GEM1 Performance Bollard Aluminum Shaft revision 10/15/10 • kim—gem1spec. pdf Approvals: Date: 12-15-10 Page: 1 of 3 Top Cap: Die-cast, low copper (< 0.6% Cu) aluminum secured to rib body by captive stainless steel alien cap screws. For lamp access, alien screws shall not require complete removal. Supports: Die-cast, low copper (< 0.6% Cu) aluminum supports secured in place as a complete cage assembly. The top section provides a cutoff lamp compartment. The supports are secured to the shaft by four stainless steel tie rods. Refractor: Thermally tempered soda lime glass sealed with silicone gaskets top and bottom. Socket: Porcelain medium base socket rated 4KV for HID Plastic socket for Fluorescent. Shaft: One-piece aluminum extrusion, .125' minimum wall thickness with a heavy cast aluminum anchor base concealed within the shaft. Hex socket stainless steel set screws shall lock the shaft onto the cast frangible anchor base. Ballast: Factory mounted to rigid harness attached to the anchor base. Wiring shall be supplied from the socket for field connection to the prewired ballast components. HID: High power factor with starting temperatures of -20°F. for PMH and -40°F. for HPS lamp modes. 26W, 32W Fluorescent: High power factor with starting temperature of 0°F. LED Optical System: A total of 9 LED emitters configured in a rectangular array comprised together as a module. Two (2) modules for 30 LED version; three (3) modules for 45 LED version; and four (4) modules for 60 LED version. Available in "Halogen White" (approx. 3500K). Emitters are directly attached to the electronic driver. LED Driver: Constant current electronic driver. Rated for 30, 45, or 60 watts. Available in 120V or 277V input. -40°F. starting temperature. All drivers are Underwriters Laboratories recognized. Anchor Bolts: Four 3/8' x 10' + 2' zinc plated J-bolts, each with two nuts, washers and a rigid pressed board template. Finish: Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness, applied over a titanated zirconium conversion coating; 2500 hour salt spray test endurance rating. Standard colors are Black, Dark Bronze, Light Gray, Platinum Silver, or White. Custom colors are available. CAUTION: Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with national, state and/or local electrical codes. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. Listings and Ratin s UL cUL 1598' C Ambient IP 46 Rated CE CO = Cut Off 'Suitable for wet locations. 'Dark Sky Legislation Compliant KIM LIGHTING RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT NOTICE. 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5612210288 *. GEM1 Performance Bollard Aluminum Shaft IGM LIGHTNG revision 10/15/10 • kim—geml_spec.pdf Type: B3 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page: 2 of 3 Standard and Optional Features Fixture I Cat. No. GEM1 Fixture with Aluminum Shaft Electrical Module PMH = Pulse Start Metal Halide HIPS = High Pressure Sodium PL = Compact Fluorescent LED = Light Emitting Diodes Lamp Lamp Line Watts Type Volts 70 PMH 277 NOTE: For lamp/ballast information outside of the U.S.A. and Canada, please consult your local Kim representative. Finish Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint over a titanated zirconium conversion coating on fixture and shaft. Cat. Nos. for Electrical Modules available: Pulse Start Metal Halide High Pressure Sodium 1170PMH120 1100PMH120 L 170HPS120 C 11001-11PS120 [ 170PMH2O8 1 l 10OPMH2O8 ❑ 70HPS208 11100HPS208 1 170PMH240 I10OPMH240 Ll70HPS240 1 I100HPS240 1170PMH277 110OPMH277 F] 70HPS277 L_J 100HPS277 ❑ 70PMH347 L 1100PMH347 I170HPS347 [ 1100HPS347 Lamp E-17, Clear E-17, Clear_ ED-17, Clear ED-17, Clear Socket Medium Base Medium Base Medium Base Medium Base ANSI Ballast M-98 M-90 S-62 S-54 Type Compact Fluorescent LED Z 30LED120 LI45LED120 1160LED120 1132PL' 1130LED277 1145LED277 1 160LED277 0. 0. �. IES Type 1 IES Type 3 IES Type 5 Lamp Compact Fluor. LED LED LED _ Socket GX24q-3 N/A N/A N/A 132PL operates one 26, or 32 watt lamp at 120 thru 277 volts (50-60 Hz). NOTE: Clear lamps are recommended. Top Cap Color: Black Dark Bronze Light Gray Platinum Silver White Custom Color' Cat. No.: [ 1 BL [--� DB ❑ LG [ 1 PS 11 WH ❑ CC 'Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. Consult representative. Custom color description: Aluminum Riser (Shaft) Aluminum Riser shaft is finished to match fixture with super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint over a titanated zirconium conversion coating. Houseside Shield 90' houseside shield. Cat. No. J HS .032" thick aluminum, painted to match fixture. ❑ No Option w� 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5612210288 GEM1 Performance Bollard IaM LIGHTING Aluminum Shaft revision 10/15/10 • kim—geml_spec.pdf Type: Job: Standard and Optional Features Page: 3 of 3 Emergency Battery Internal battery pack provides 90 minutes of supplemental light at 23% Back-up of initial lamp lumens for 26, or 32 watt compact fluorescent lamps. 1 Cat. No. ❑ EM ❑ No Option Battery Back-up compact fluorescent only. Cold -Pack Emergency The EM-CP option is a temperature controlled ballast designed to - Battery Pack maintain operation without interruption within a range of hi/low Cat. No. ❑ EM-CP ambient temperatures, -20°C to +55°C. ck El No No Option Internal Cold -Pack emergency battery pack provides up to 90 battery back-up minutes of supplemental light. See following table for max. lumens bback-up output by lamps. Lamp (4-Pin) 1 lamp lumens 32W 575 26W 450 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING - P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 - TEL: 626/968-5666 - FAX: 626/369-2695 5612210288 b" LED Downlight LF6LED 120V-277V High Efficacy 0-1 OV Dimming APPLICATIONS: Liteframe LF6LED is a 6" commercial grade LED downlight that utilizes remote phospor technology to obtain color consistency, energy savings, and low maintenance costs. 50,000 hours minimum life up to 40°C (104* F) in open plenum applications. HOUSING: One-piece 22 gauge noncorrosive steel platform. Pre -wired J-box with snap -on cover for easy access. Snap -in connection from driver compartment allows easy installation of light engine/trim assembly without tools above or below the ceiling and can be upgraded to accommodate technology improvements. Approved for 8 (4 in/4 out) No. 12 AWG conductors rated for 90oC through wiring. REFLECTOR: High purity aluminum, Alzak, iridescence suppressed, semi -diffuse reflector. Selftrim standard. Painted white self -trim (WT) available as option. LED LIGHT ENGINE: The LF6LED uses the Philips Fortimo DIM LED Module with remote phosphor technology. This technology provides controlled color consistency from fixture to fixture. The system is designed for optimal life and lumen maintenance (50,000 hours at 70% lumen maintenance). Both reflector and light engine assembly are mechanically retained to housing. The light engine comes standard with 80 CRI in all Kelvin temperatures. Order housing, reflector, and accessories separately CATALOG NUMBER: LED DRIVER: The LF6LED utilizes the Philips Fortimo LED Driver specifically designed to optimize efficiency of the Fortimo DLM Module. Driver is designed to match the 50,000 hour minimum life expectancy of the system. Meets UL Class 2, inherent short circuit protection, self limited, overload protected. If critical temperatures are reached on driver or LED module, integrated thermal feedback loop will gradually reduce current to protect system life. Driver is universal 120V-277V. DIMMING: Comes standard with 0-1 OV dimming capability. Flicker -free dimming to 10%. INSTALLATION: Light commercial bar hangers included. Universal adjustable mounting brackets also accept %2" EMT conduit or 1 Y2" or 3/4" lathing channel (by others) or Prescolite 24" bar hangers (B24 or B6). Wall wash orientation may be field adjusted in 90' increments to housing. CERTIFICATIONS: CSA certified to US and Canadian safety standards. Suitable for wet locations. Approved for through wiring. Non -IC rated. WARRANTY- 5 year warranty. HOUSING/LED LED GENERATION VOLTAGE OPTIONS TRIM COLOR TEMP ❑ LF6LED ❑ Blank ❑ WW2 6" High 120V-277V Wall Efficacy LED Wash Housing with 0-1 OV Dimming to 10% Orescolite A Division of Hubbell Lighting, Inc. Ll 6LFLEDS ❑ 30K 6" Open 3000 Kelvin, Reflector/ 80 CRI Light Engine ❑ 35K Assembly, 3500 Kelvin, Nominal 900 80 CRI lumen output ❑ 40K 4000 Kelvin, 80 CRI REF. FINISH ❑ Blank Alzak Semi - Diffuse DATE: TYPE: C FIRM NAME: PROJECT: LitPFramp Ceiling Cutout: 61/4" Maximum Ceiling Thickness 1'/4" For conversion to millimeters, multiply inches by 25.4 Not to Scale 14" *See page 3 for WW line art EXAMPLE: LF6LED 6LFLED5 30K REF. COLOR REF. OPTIONS ACCESSORIES ❑ Blank ❑ CG Champagne Gold Alzak ❑ BL Black Alzak ❑ WE Wheat Alzak ❑ LW Light Wheat Alzak ❑ PW Pewter Alzak ❑ WH' White Paint ❑ WT ❑ White Trim ❑ TRG Trim Ring ❑ Gasket (factory installed) ❑ WW2 ❑ Wall Wash B24 Set of two(2) 24" bar hangers for T-bar ceilings B6 Set of two (2) bar hangers for ceiling joist up to 24" centers LFSC63 6" reflector screw cover 'Requires WT option 'WW option must be selected on both the housing and trim 3Not compatible with W W In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not alter the function of the product. Web: www.prescolite.com * Tech Support: (888) 777-4832 LFR-LED-001 PHOTOMETRIC DATA DRIVER DATA LF6LED5 30K LF6LED5 35K LF6LED5 40K Input Voltage 120-277V 120-277V 120-277V Input Frequency 50/60 Hz 50/60 Hz 50/60 Hz Input Current 0.146A (120v) 0.156A (120v) 0.137A (120v) 0.063 (277v) 0.067 (277v) 0.059 (277v) Input Power 17.3W 18.5W 16.3 Constant Current Output 200-700mA 200-700mA 200-700mA Power Factor >_0.90 z0.90 >-0.90 THD <20% <20% <20% EMI Filtering FCC 47CFR FCC 47CFR FCC 47CFR Part 15, Class A Part 15, Class A Part 15, Class A Operating Temperature -20aC to 55eC -20°C to 55'C -20°C to 55°C Dimming 0-10V 0-10V 0-10V Over -voltage, overcurrent, short-circuit protected LF6LED 6LFLED5 30K LED light Engine: 3000K, 80 CRI System Wattage: 17.3W Fixture Delivered Lumens: 890 Fixture Efficacy: 51 Spacing Criteria: 1 .2 90o CANDELA DISTRIBUTION DEG CANDELA LUMENS 75o 0 541 5 548 53 60o 15 580 164 25 540 250 35 459 283 45 177 134 45° 55 3 5 65 0 1 75 0 0 85 0 0 90 0 0 Test No. 3264 Tested at 25oC Ambient in accordance to IESNA LM-79-2008 LF6LED 6LFLED5 35K LED Light Engine: 3500K, 80 CRI System Wattage: 18.5W Fixture Delivered Lumens: 916 Fixture Efficacy: 50 Spacing Criteria: 1.2 90o CANDELA DISTRIBUTION 0 DEG CANDELA LUMENS 75' 0 573 5 584 56 60' 15 606 170 25 562 259 35 469 289 45 179 136 45' 55 3 4 65 1 1 75 0 0 0° 15' 30' 85 0 90 0 0 Test No. 3332 Tested at 25aC Ambient in accordance to IESNA LM-79-2008 LiteFrame - 6" LFUED Downlight ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY LUMINANCE DATA IN CANDELA/ ZONE LUMENS %LUMINAIRE SO. METER 0-30 466 52.4 Angle in Vertical Average - 0n 0-40 749 84.2 45o 14936 0-60 889 99.9 55' 312 0-90 890 100.0 65' 0 90-180 0 0.0 75' 0 0-180 890 100.0 85' 0 CeIFFFICIFNTC AF I1T1117ATIAN 7-1 (--if,, Matk-4 % Effective Floor Cavity Reflectance z 80% 1 70% 1 501k 1 30 % 1 10% E . ` 200/. Effective Floor Cavity Reflectance 8 % Wall Reflectance 70 5030 10 7050 30 10 50 30 10 5030 10 50 30 10 1 113 110107 105 110108105 103 104 102 10C 100 98 97 96 95 94 2 107 101 97 93 104 99 95 92 96 93 90 93 90 88 90 88 86 3 100 93 88 83 98 92 87 82 89 85 81 87 83 80 84 81 79 4 94 86 80 75 92 85 79 74 82 77 74 80 76 73 78 75 72 5 89 79 73 68 87 78 72 67 76 71 67 75 70 66 73 69 66 6 83 73 66 62 82 72 66 61 71 65 61 69 64 61 68 64 60 7 78 68 61 56 77 67 61 56 66 60 56 64 59 55 63 59 55 9 74 63 56 52 72 62 56 51 61 55 51 60 55 51 59 54 51 9 69 59 52 47 68 58 52 47 57 51 47 56 51 47 55 50 47 10 66 55 48 44 64 54 48 44 53 48 44 1 52 47 43 52 47 43 LF&ED 6LFLED5 30K lest No. 3264 ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY LUMINANCE DATA IN CANDELA/ ZONE LUMENS %LUMINAIRE SO. METER 0-30 486 53.0 Angle in Vertical Average - 0-40 775 84.6 45' 15105 0-60 915 99.9 55' 312 0-90 916 100.0 65o 141 90-180 0 0.0 75a 0 0-180 916 100.0 85' 0 rnFFFICIFWTC 9119 1ITI117ATInW 7..r...1 r'.,.dt.. AAatk ,.l % Effective Floor Covity Reflectance r 80% 70"/ 50'/, 30% 10% 0 E oc 20% Effective Floor Cavity Reflectance 8 % Wall Reflectance 70 5030 10 70 50 30 10 50 30 10 5030 10 50 30 10 1 113 110107 105 01108105 103 104 102 1 100 98 97 97 95 94 2 107 101 97 93 10A 99 95 92 96 93 90 93 90 88 90 88 86 3 100 93 88 83 98 92 87 83 89 85 81 87 83 80 84 BI 79 4 94 86 80 75 92 85 79 75 83 78 74 80 76 73 79 75 72 5 89 79 73 68 87 78 72 68 77 71 67 75 70 66 73 69 66 6 83 73 67 62 82 73 66 62 71 65 61 70 65 61 68 64 60 7 78 68 61 57 77 67 61 56 66 60 56 65 60 56 64 59 55 8 74 63 56 52 73 63 56 52 61 56 51 60 55 51 59 55 51 9 70 59 52 48 68 58 52 48 57 52 47 56 51 47 55 51 47 10 66 55 48 44 65 54 48 44 54 48 44 53 47 44 52 47 44 LF6LLU 61-1-LLW 331K lest — aas4 Web: www.prescolite.com • Tech Support: 1888) 777-4832 C J ^ n 0 I I + /1 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 U.S.A. • Phone (864) 678-1000 I` C Copyright ©2010 Prescoline, Inc., o division of Hubbell Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved Specifications subject to change without notice. • Prinmd in U,S A. • LFR-LED-001 • 10/11/10 Hubbell Lighting, Inc. 1 PHOTOMETRIC DATA LF6LED 6LFLED5 40K LED Light Engine: 4000K, 80 CRI System Wattage: 16.3W Fixture Delivered Lumens: 911 Fixture Efficacy: 55 Spacing Criteria: 1.2 90° CANDELA DISTRIBUTION DEG CANDELA LUMENS 75° 0 569 5 580 56 60° 15 602 169 25 560 258 35 467 288 45 178 135 45° 55 3 4 65 1 0 75 0 0 85 0 0 90 0 0 Test No. 3333 Tested at 25°C Ambient in accordance to IESNA LM-79-2008 LF6LEDWW 6LFLED5 35K WW LED Light Engine: 3500K, 80 CRI System Wattage: 18.5W Fixture Delivered Lumens: 830 Fixture Efficacy: 46 " 1 90° � 1 250 ` 1 60° I 500 45° 750 LiteFrame - 6" LFUED Downlight ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY LUMINANCE DATA IN CANDELA/ ZONE LUMENS %LUMINAIRE SO. METER 0-30 483 53.0 Angle in Vertical Average - 0-40 771 84.6 AY 15021 0-60 911 99.9 55° 312 0-90 911 100.0 65° 141 90-180 0 0.0 75° 0 0-180 911 100.0 85° 0 CCIFFFICIFNTS CIF 11T1117ATICIKI 7-1 (—ih, KA.fl,nri CANDELA DISTRIBUTION DEG 0.0 90.0 180.0 0 600 600 600 5 608 632 619 15 711 683 537 25 656 566 235 35 599 243 19 45 470 35 4 55 243 4 1 65 65 1 0 75 1 1 0 85 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0° 15° 30° 0—deg 90-deg--______ 180-deg — — — — Test No. 3483 Tested at 25°C Ambient in accordance to IESNA LM-79-2008 % Effective Floor Cavity Reflectance D b 80% 70'/ 50 % 30 % 1 10 a V `a E oc 20 % Effective Floor Cavity Reflectance g % Wall Reflectance 70 5030 10 70 50 30 10 50 30 10 3030 10 50 30 10 1 113 110107 105 110108105 103 104 102 10 I00 98 97 97 95 94 7 107 101 97 93 104100 95 92 96 93 90 93 90 88 90 88 86 3 100 93 88 83 98 92 87 83 89 85 81 87 83 80 84 81 79 4 9"'86 80 75 93 85 79 75 83 78 74 a 76 73 79 75 72 5 89 79 73 68 87 78 72 68 77 71 67 75 70 67 73 69 66 6 83 73 67 62 82 73 66 62 71 65 61 70 65 61 68 64 60 7 78 68 61 57 77 67 61 56 66 60 56 65 60 56 6d 59 55 8 74 63 57 52 73 63 56 52 61 56 52 60 55 51 59 55 51 9 70 59 52 d8 68 58 52 48 57 52 48 56 51 47 55 51 47 10 66 55 d8 dd 1 65 54 48 44 54 48 44 53 48 44 52 47 44 LF6LED 6LFLED5 40K Test No. 3333 LUMINANCE DATA IN CANDELA/SO. METER Angle in Vertical 0 DEG 90 DEG 180 DEG 45° 34598 675 338 55° 19974 104 0 65° 3530 0 0 75° 0 0 0 85° 0 0 0 3 3 5 tl b e 7 8 B tj 9 MULTIPLE UNITS 1' E' 3' 4' -(�- ��MON +U FTS ON 3' DISTANCE FIXTURE MOUNTED OUT FROM WALLS FOOTCANDLE DISTRIBUTION ON WALL SURFACE 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 14 10 2 0 0 14 II 14 14 4 14 19 IS 8 2 0 20 27 20 19 IS 19 14 13 9 4 1 IB 22 IB 15 11 15 10 9 7 5 2 14 17 14 12 15 12 6 6 6 4 3 11 12 I I 9 11 9 5 4 4 3 3 8 9 8 7 8 7 3 3 3 3 2 6 6 6 5 6 5 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 1 4 5 4 C LF6LED WW S Test No. 3483 STANDARD WALL WASH ORIENTATION FIELD CONFIGURABLE WALL WASH ORIENTATION I WALL DIRECTION 3/4" 7-1/8" WALL DIRECTION 7-1/8" II.5.3�4"�Z 1-1/4" 5" 15-1/2" Web: www.pre5cofifia.co. • Tech Support: (888) 777-4832 r e s c o I t e w 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 U.S.A. • Phone (864) 678-1000 Copyright ©2010 Prescolite, Inc., a division of Hubbell Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved Specifications subject to change without notice. - Printed in U.S.A. - LFR-LED-001 . 10/11 /10 Hubbell Lighting, Inc. wM LIGHTING A4111 Type: S1 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Catalog number: 1 SA / WP9SE3 / 6011-31<12 / DB / Mtg. Fixture Electrical Module Finish Options -4 — See page 2 1 See pages 3 WME-LED WARPS"- Small, Electronic LED revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Select polms and Poles Selection Guide. If pole is provided by others indicate O.D. for arm fitting. Specifications WPSISE-LED Small Electronic 60 Light Emitting Diodes Total Max System Watts = 73W Maximum weight: 30 lbs. 41/8" (105 mm) 1 1/2"-{—I 815/16" (38 mm) (227 mm) FRONT TOP 2615/16" (684 mm) 815/16" (227 mm) 1" (25 mm) 59/16" (141 mm) SIDE (113 r 113 mm) 15" (381 mm) BOTTOM Lens shall be clear glass 'NOTE: Driver compartment door extends down 1" on small housing to accommodate integral step-down transformer on 347V and 480V models only. ED U.S. Patent D568,521, HUBBELL LIGHTING. INC. Patent Pending Optics Approvals: Date: 12/15/10 Page: 1 of 5 Housing: One-piece die-cast, low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum alloy with integral cooling ribs over the electrical compartment. Solid barrier wall separates optical and electrical compartments. A single die-cast aluminum cam -latch provides positive locking and sealing of the optical chamber. A one-piece extruded and vulcanized silicone gasket seals the housing against the lens surface. Lens: Clear 3/16" thick tempered glass lens retained by a stainless steel piano hinge and a single die-cast aluminum cam -latch. The edges are camouflaged to conceal the outer portion of the housing. Electronic Module: All electrical components are UL and CSA recognized, mounted on a single plate and factory prewired with quick -disconnect plugs. Module includes a driver, thermal control device and surge protector. Electrical module attaches to housing with no -tool hinges and latches, accessible by opening the lens frame only. Driver is rated for -40°F starting and has a 0- 10V dimming interface for multi -level illumination options. Optical Module: Precision, replaceable MicroEmitters are positioned to achieve directional control toward desired task. The entire EmitterDeck fastens to the housing as a one-piece module. Support Arm: Heavy cast, low copper aluminum alloy with stainless steel mounting bolts. A pole reinforcing plate is provided with wire strain relief. Arm is circular cut for specified round pole. Finish: Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness, applied over a titanated zirconium conversion coating; 2500 hour salt spray test enduWce rating. Standard colors are Black, Dark Bronze, Stealth Gray , Platinum Silver, or White. Custom colors are available. Warranty: Kim Lighting warrants Warp9 LED products ("Product(s)") sold by Kim Li hting to be free from defects in material and workmanship for $ a period of five (5) Using metal Fparts, (ii) a period of ten (10) years for exterior housin paint nish(s), (iii) a period of six (6) years for LED Light Engines (MicroEmitters) and, (iv) a period of f�e (5) years for LED power components (LED Driver, LifeShield device, Surge Protector), from the date of sale of such goods to the buyer as specified in Kim Lighting shipment documents for each product. CAUTION: Fixtures must be rounded in accordance with national, state and/or local electrical codes. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. Listings and Ratings UL cUL 1598' CE IP66 Rated I 25°C Ambient 'Suitable for wet locations. KIM LIGHTING RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT NOTICE. © 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91116-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 Aek WP9SE-LED IaM LIGHTING WARM'- Small, Electronic LED revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Type: S1 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page: 2 of 5 1:: Standard Features Mounting Plan View: Wall Mount 3Y configuration available �0 or for round poles only. 4r + EPA: 0.52 1.04 0.82 1.3 1.3 1.5 n/a Cat. No.: I 1 SA 112SB 1-12SL F- 3ST 113SY 114SC ❑ 1 W Fixture Cat. No. designates fixture and light distribution. See the Kim Warp9 Catalog for detailed information on reflector design and application. Electrical Module 'Due to current unavailability of 347V and 480V drivers, specification of these voltages may feature an integral step-down transformer. Driver compartment door extends down 1 " on smal I housing to accommodate transformer. WP9 S Housing: WP9—WARP9 Size: S=Small, 60 LEDs, 75W E ffDriver:nic Distribution: E 1=Type I Full Cutoff ❑ 2=Type II Full Cutoff J 3=Type III Full Cutoff ❑ 4=Type IV Full Cutoff ❑ 4NB=Type IV -No Backlight ❑ 5=Type V Square Full Cutoff f J R=Type R Right Full Cutoff ❑ L=Type L Left Full Cutoff *Type IV -NB No Backlight - Dimension 15/18" 261�e 815/8" (33 mm) (684 mm) (227 mm) I O (211 mm) 6 �8 (25 mm) 59/18" (175 mm) (141 mm) SIDE Color Temperature:' W L3K=3500K ❑ L5K=5100K ❑ L2K = 580nm - Amber Light Distribution: (f�) n Type I Type II Type III 60 Type IV Type IV -NB* Type V Forward No Square Thtow Backlight i D Type R I ype I Right Lett I--� 4 %e" (113mm 15' 14318" (381 mm) (378 mm)D�= � 6W� (175 mm) BOTTOM '4300K and 6500K are also available on an "Engineered -to -Order" (ETO) basis. x Voltage: m 120=120V ❑ 208=208V ❑ 240=240V ❑ 277=277V ❑ 347=347V2 ❑ 480=480V2 Fixture Total System Watts volt OperatingAmps 9 ma 73 120 0.61 9 ma 73 208 0.35 ma 73 240 0.30 WP9-Small 73 277 0. 9 ma 73 _ 347 0.21 mal 73 480 0.15 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 FA1' iaM ucHnrG Type: S1 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Optional Features WP9SE-LED WARPS'"- Small, Electronic LED revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled—spec.pdf Page: 3 of 5 Finish Color: Black Dark Bronze Stealth Gray'' Platinum Silver White Custom Color' Super TGIC powder Cat. No.: f IBL TDB El SIG ❑PS ❑WH El CC coat paint over a titanated 'Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. zirconium conversion coating. Consult representative. Custom color description: Wall Mounting A cast aluminum mounting plate is mounted to the wall Cover Plate Cat. No. 1W with four bolts (by others). Fixture and arm are Select from Mounting on mounted to the cast aluminum cover plate before 11 (2"" Length 292.1 mm) Splice Access page 2. attachingto the wall mountinglate. The fixture -arm- 61/4"width Cover pto cover plate assembly is hookethe wall mounting plate and secured with stainless steel screws provided. ,n mm) 4v4" 9 �6" Field splices are made at the opening in the cover (,�9mm, (14.3mm) 2399mm) plate. Cover is finished to match arm and fixture color. 269jm s3/4" 22a3rtm> Mounting Plate 23/4" (98.9 mm) Fusing (internal only): High temperature fuse holders factory installed inside the fixture Cat. No. (see chart housing. Fuse is included. at right) Line Volts: 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V ❑ No Option Cat. No.: ❑ SF ❑ DF ❑ DF ❑ SF ❑ SF ❑ DF Single Fuse Photocell Controls (:al. Nos. receptacle ❑ A-25 Two types of photocell controls are available. A receptacle for a NEMA base photocell or an internal photocell button sensor on the Line side of the fixture. Button Volts Receptca Button ❑ A-30 - 120V ❑ A-31 - 208V ❑ A-32 - 240V Mounting (see page 2) 1 A 1 W 2B ❑ A-33 - 277V El A-35 - 347V-Fixture with Photocell Receptacle $ s s s $ ❑ A-34 - 480V S - slave unit(s) n No Option 2L 3T, 3Y 4C Lexan Lens One-piece flat advanced polymer (Lexan®) replaces standard tempered Cat. No. ❑ LS glass lens. ❑ No Option CAUTION: Use only when vandalism is anticipated to be high. For LED use only. Lexan® Lens Tamper -Resistant Latch Standard die-cast latch is provided with a captive 10-32 stainless steel Tamper Resistant Latch Cat. No. L TL flat socket -head screw to prevent unauthorized opening. ❑ No Option NOTE: Required only for vandal protection in locations where fixtures can be reached by unauthorized persons. © 2010 KIM LIGHTING - P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 - TEL: 626/968-5666 - FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 A WP9SE-LED WARP9T"- Small, Electronic LED MM LIGHTING revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Type: S1 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Horizontal Slipfitter Mount Cat. No. ❑ HSF ❑ No Option Vertical Slipfitter Mounts Cat. No. includes Mounting Cat. No. (See right) ❑ No Option Dimming Controls Optional Features Page: 4 of 5 Replaces standard mounting arm with a cast aluminum Horizontal Slipfitter fitter to adapt to a horizontal 2" pipe -size mounting end (23/8" OD). The casting has a 50 adjustment to _ accommodate davit arms that are not horizontal. Horizontal pipe must be field drilled at one set screw location to insure against fixture rotation Finish to Davit -arm with 2" pipe -size match fixture color. fixture mount (by others) Allows fixture or fixtues with standard mounting arm to mount to a pole with a 2" pipe -size tenon (23/8" OD). Minimum 4" tenon length required. Specify configuration (1 SA, 2SB, 2SL, 3ST, 3SY, 4SC) 4" round or square aluminum with flush cap. Finish to match fixture and arm. NOTE: 3Y only available on round slipfitter. Cat. No. ct-�� Cat. No. Mounting Configuration ❑ VSF-1 SA . ❑ SVSF-1 SA 1 SA -single arm mount ❑ VSF-2SB Stainless ❑ SVSF-2SB 2SB -2 at 1800 ❑ VSF-2SL steel set — ❑ SVSF-2SL 2SL - 2 at 900 Cl VSF-3ST screws ❑ SVSF-3ST 3ST - 3 at 900 Cl VSF-3SY 3SY -3 at 1200 ❑ VSF-4SC Round Square ❑ SVSF-4SC 4SC -4 at 90' Kim Lighting is working with several driver suppliers and control system manufacturers to develop a variety of proven turnkey solutions to meet any application's need. Kim Lighting will advise availability of complete control packages, and even two-way monitoring systems, once they have been tested and exceed Kim's high quality standards. Contact factory for further details and current capabilities. © 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX. 626/369-2695 5646810291 B WP9SE-LED WARPS'- Small, Electronic LED 19M LIGHTING revision 10-18-10 - kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Type: S1 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page: 5 of 5 NOTES: 1. Lumen loss stablization is a result of Kim Lighting's MicroEmitterlm luminaires exclusive LifeShield'm Protection System and Dual Heat Management. 2. The LifeShield'm Protection System will lower the current to the LEDs significantly if the luminaire is exposed to direct heat (sun) or excessive abnormal conditions. 3. Luminaire Lumen Loss assumptions are based on LM-80 results and an actual outdoor product testing based upon 5100K CCT, 350mA drive current. 251C/77°F tab ambient and cathode temperature at 85°C/185°F. Assumptions past 6,000 hours are interpolated. 4. Cathode temperature baseline is at 85°C/185°F. If cathode temperature increases during ambient changes and abnormal environment conditions, % of rated lumens will slightly decrease. 5. Outdoor ambient temperatures are assumed SITU average by geographic region. 6. As Solid State Lighting technology and thermal management systems continually advance, lumen loss projections are subject to improvement. Lumen Performance Charts 110 100 90 80 0°10 70 r 60 v o. c 50 d E J 40 30 20 120 110 r v E J 100 c E 90 w a oc 0 0 80 Luminaire Lumen Loss by Hours of Operation L-70 ---------- ----- --------------- ----- ----- ----------- Hours of Operation 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000 100000 Outdoor Temperature at 10°C/50°F. Temperature is based on continual average, annual assumptions. Outdoor Temperature at 40°C/104°F. Temperature is based on continual average, annual assumptions. Luminaire Output at Outdoor Ambient Temperatures 1 , , , � C v E I 0 o > 1 1 1 Stabilizes Output Due w b E 1 to Exclusive LifeShield y 1 I Protection System L o I , , , ro 70 -20°C -10°C 0°C 10°C 20°C 25°C 30°C 35°C 40°C 45°C 50°C 55°C 60°C 6S°C 70°C -4°F 14°F 32°F 50°F 68°F 77°F 86°F 122°F 95°F 104°F 122°F 132°F 140°F 149°F 158°F 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING - P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 - TEL: 626/968-5666 - FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 iaM LIGHTING Jok Type: S1A Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Catalog number: 1SA/ WP9SE-4 / 60L3K 12C / DB / WP9SE-LED WARPS""- Small, Electronic LED revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Mtg. Fixture Electrical Module Finish Options See pages 3-4 See page 2 Select polms and Poles Selection Guide. If pole is provided by others indicate O.D. for arm fitting. Specifications WP9SE-LED Small Electronic 60 Light Emitting Diodes Total Max System Watts = 73W Maximum weight: 30 lbs. 4Ye" (105 mm) (38 mm) (227 mm) FRONT If0I 2615/16" (684 mm) 815/16" (227 mm) Q 1" (25 mm) 59/16" (141 mm) SIDE 4 %s" (113 mm) F5'(38 BOTTOM L Lens shall be clear glass 'NOTE: Driver compartment door extends down 1" on small housing to accommodate integral step-down transformer on 347V and 480V models only. HUBBELL U.S. Patent D568,521, HUBBELL LIGHTING. INC. Patent Pending Optics Approvals: Date: 12-12-10 Page: 1 of 5 Housing: One-piece die-cast, low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum alloy with integral cooling ribs over the electrical compartment. Solid barrier wall separates optical and electrical compartments. A single die-cast aluminum cam -latch provides positive lockingand sealing of the optical chamber. A one-piece extrudedand vulcanized silicone gasket seals the housing against the lens surface. Lens: Clear 3/16" thick tempered glass lens retained by a stainless steel piano hinge and a single die-cast aluminum cam -latch. The edges are camouflaged to conceal the outer portion of the housing. Electronic Module: All electrical components are UL and CSA recognized, mounted on a single plate and factory prewired with quick -disconnect plugs. Module includes a driver, thermal control device and surge protector. Electrical module attaches to housing with no -tool hinges and latches, accessible by opening the lens frame only. Driver is rated for -40OF starting and has a 0- 10V dimming interface for multi -level illumination options. Optical Module: Precision, replaceable MicroEmitters are positioned to achieve directional control toward desired task. The entire EmitterDeck fastens to the housing as a one-piece module. Support Arm: Heavy cast, low copper aluminum alloy with stainless steel mounting bolts. A pole reinforcing plate is provided with wire strain relief. Arm is circular cut for specified round pole. Finish: Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness, applied over a titanated zirconium conversion coating; 2500 hour salt spray test enduWce rating. Standard colors are Black, Dark Bronze, Stealth Gray , Platinum Silver, or White. Custom colors are available. Warranty: Kim Lighting warrants War 9 LED products ("Product(s)") sold by Kim Lighting to be free from defects in material and workmanship for (i) a period of five (5) Musing metal FIi parts, (ii) a period of ten (10) years for exterior housing paint nish(s), (iii) a period of six (6) years for LED Light Engines (MicroEmitters) and, (iv) a period of �ye (5) years for LED power components (LED Driver, LifeShield device, Surge Protector), from the date of sale of such goods to the buyer as specified in Kim Lighting shipment documents for each product. CAUTION: Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with national, state and/or local electrical codes. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. Listings and Ratings UL cUL 1598' CE I IP66 Rated 25°C Ambient 'Suitable for wet locations. KIM LIGHTING RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT NOTICE. 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 WP9SE-LED WARPS'"'- Small, Electronic LED MM LIGHTING revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Type: S1A Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page: 2 of 5 Standard Features Mounting Plan View: Wall Mount 3Y configuration available or for round poles only. or + EPA: 0.52 1.04 0.82 1.3 1.3 1.5 n/a Cat. No.: Z 1 SA ❑ 2SB ❑ 2SL ❑ 3ST ❑ 3SY ❑ 4SC ❑ 1 W Fixture Cat. No. designates fixture and light distribution. See the Kim Warp9 Catalog for detailed information on reflector design and application. Electrical Module 'Due to current unavailability of 347V and 480V drivers, specification of these voltages may feature an integral step-down transformer. Driver compartment door extends down 1" on small housing to accommodate transformer. WP9 S 7ouing: WAR P9 Size: S=Small, 60 LEDs, 75W E [Driver. E=Electronic Distribution: ❑ 1=Type I Full Cutoff ❑ 2=Type II Full Cutoff ❑ 3=Type III Full Cutoff 4=Type IV Full Cutoff ❑ 4NB=Type IV -No Backlight ❑ 5=TypeV Square Full Cutoff ❑ R=Type R Right Full Cutoff ❑ L=Type L Left Full Cutoff * Type IV -NB No Backlight - Dimension 15/6" 2615/1e" 815/ie" (33 mm) � (684 mm) (227 mm) Q (1" (211 mm) 25 mm) 6%6" 56/6" (175 mm) (141 mm) 60 f ource: =60LED's SIDE Color Temperature:' L3K=3500K ❑ L5K=5100K ❑ L2K = 580nm - Amber Light Distribution: (f�) C) Type I Type II Type III 5 0 Type IV Type IV -NB* Type V Forward No Square Throw Backlight j D Type R lype I Right 101 4 %6" (113 mm 15" 14%8" « (381 mm) (378 mm) MW 6W1 (175 mm) BOTTOM '4300K and 6500K are also available on an "Engineered -to -Order" (ETO) basis. x Voltage: W 120=120V ❑ 208=208V ❑ 240=240V ❑ 277=277V ❑ 347=347V2 ❑ 480=480V2 Fixture Total System Watts Volt OperatingAmps P9 mall 73 120 0.61 9 ma l 73 208 0.35 mall 73 240 0.30 9 mall 73 277 _ WP�ma—lll 73 347 0.21 W139-Small 73 480 0.15 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 IQM LIGHTING Jt WP9SE-LED WARP9-_ Small, Electronic LED revision 10-18-10 • kim—wp9seled—spec.pdf Type: S1A Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page: 3 Of 5 W Optional Features Finish Color: Black Dark Bronze Stealth Grar Platinum Silver White Custom Colon Super TGIC powder Cat. No.: ❑ BIL DB ❑ SG ❑ PS ❑ WH ❑ CC coat paint over a titanated zirconium conversion Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. coating. Consult representative. Custom color description: Wall Mounting A cast aluminum mounting plate is mounted to the wall Cover Plate Cat. No. 1W with four bolts (by others). Fixture and arm are __ Select from Mounting on mounted to the cast aluminum cover plate before Splice O 11' 29 Length Access Y9Y, mm' page 2. attaching to the wall mounting late. The fixture -arm- g g P Cover 6/4"width (,W8mm) cover plate assembly is hooked to the wall mounting C, - and secured with stainless steel screws (,3J9�mm) -av4" plate provided. Field splices are made at the opening in the cover a . (� "" (43mm) plate. Cover is finished to match arm and fixture color. 6�s!em, za3/mm,�Mounting Plate 5 23/4" (69 9 mm) Fusing (internal only): High temperature fuse holders factory installed inside the fixture Cat. No. (see chart housing. Fuse is included. at right) Line Volts: 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V ❑ No Option Cat. No.: ❑ SF ❑ DF ❑ DF ❑ SF ❑ SF ❑ DF Single Fuse Photocell Controls Cat. Nos. receptacle ❑ A-25 Two types of photocell controls are available. A receptacle for a NEMA base photocell or an internal photocell button sensor on the Line side of the fixture. Button Volts Receptical Button ❑ A-30 - 120V ❑ A-31 - 208V �s ElA-32 - 240V Mounting (see page 2) 1 A, 1 W 2B ❑A-33-277V ElA-35 - 347V s s $ $ *—Fixture with Photocell Receptacle ❑ A-34 - 480V $ S — slave unit(s) ❑ No Option 2L 3T, 3Y 4C: Lexan Lens One-piece flat advanced polymer (Lexan®) replaces standard tempered Cat. No. ElLS glass lens. ❑ No Option CAUTION: Use only when vandalism is anticipated to be high. For LED use only. Lexan® Lens Tamper -Resistant Latch Standard die-cast latch is provided with a captive 10-32 stainless steel Tamper Resistant Latch Cat. No. ❑ TL flat socket -head screw to prevent unauthorized opening. ❑ No Option NOTE: Required only for vandal protection in locations where fixtures can be reached by unauthorized persons. 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING - P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 - TEL: 626/968-5666 - FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 WP9SE-LED WARPS'"'- Small, Electronic LED IaM LIGHTING revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Type: S1A Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page: 4 of 5 Optional Features Horizontal Slipfitter Mount Replaces standard mounting arm with a cast aluminum Horizontal Slipfitter Cat. No. ElHSF fitter to adapt to a horizontal 2" pipe -size mounting end El No Option (23/8" OD). The casting has a 50 adjustment to accommodate davit arms that are not horizontal. Horizontal pipe must be field drilled at one set screw location to insure against fixture rotation Finish to Davit -arm with 2" pipe -size match fixture color. fixture mount (by others) Vertical Slipfitter Mounts Cat. No. includes Mounting Cat. No. (See right) C i No Option Dimming Controls Allows fixture or fixtues with standard mounting arm to mount to a pole with a 2" pipe -size tenon (23/8" OD). Minimum 4" tenon length required. Specify configuration (1SA, 2SB, 2SL, 3ST, 3SY, 4SC) 4" round or square aluminum with flush cap. Finish to match fixture and arm. NOTE: 3Y only available on round slipfitter. Cat. No. <SZO Cat. No. Mounting Configuration ❑ VSF-1SA ❑ SVSF-1SA 1 SA -single arm mount ElVSF-2SB v Stainless ElSVSF-2SB 2SB -2 at 1800 ElVSF-2SL — steel set — ❑ SVSF-2SL 2SL - 2 at 90° ❑ VSF-3ST screws ❑ SVSF-3ST 3ST - 3 at 90° ❑ VSF-3SY 3SY -3 at 1200 ❑ VSF-4SC Round Square L1 SVSF-4SC 4SC -4 at 90° Kim Lighting is working with several driver suppliers and control system manufacturers to develop a variety of proven turnkey solutions to meet any application's need. Kim Lighting will advise availability of complete control packages, and even two-way monitoring systems, once they have been tested and exceed Kim's high quality standards. Contact factory for further details and current capabilities. © 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTHY, CA 91716-0080 • T EL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 1 WP9SE-LED WARPS-- Small, Electronic LED HUM LIGHTING revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Type: S1A Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page: 5 of 5 NOTES: 1. Lumen loss stablization is a result of Kim Lighting's MicroEmitterTm luminaires exclusive LifeShielclTM Protection System and Dual Heat Management. 2. The LifeShieldTM Protection System will lower the current to the LEDs significantly if the luminaire is exposed to direct heat (sun) or excessive abnormal conditions. 3. Luminaire Lumen Loss assumptions are based on LM-80 results and an actual outdoor product testing based upon 5100K CCT, 350mA drive current. 251C/771F tab ambient and cathode temperature at 850C/1850F. Assumptions past 6,000 hours are interpolated. 4. Cathode temperature baseline is at 85°C/185°F. If cathode temperature increases during ambient changes and abnormal environment conditions, % of rated lumens will slightly decrease. 5. Outdoor ambient temperatures are assumed SITU average by geographic region. 6. As Solid State Lighting technology and thermal management systems continually advance, lumen loss projections are subject to improvement. Lumen Performance Charts 110 100 90 80 1' b 70 c v 60 v a - 50 E J 40 30 20 120 i10 E 100 L E —1 90 v v A o: O 80 Luminaire Lumen Loss by Hours of Operation ---- - - - - -- - - - - - - - ------ - - - - -- - - - -- - - - ----------- L-70 Hours of Operation 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000 100000 Outdoor Temperature at 10°C/50°F. Temperature is based on continual average, annual assumptions. N Outdoor Temperature at 40°0104°F. Temperature is based on continual average, annual assumptions. Luminaire Output at Outdoor Ambient Temperatures , , I I = v E o , W Stabilizes Output Due ro to Exclusive LifeShield W I Protection System I— 1 I L , , , , 70 -20°C -10'C 0°C 10°C 20°C 25°C 30°C 35°C 40°C 45°C 50°C 55°C 60°C 65°C 70-C -4°F 14°F 32°F 50°F 68°F 77°F 86°F 122°F 950F 104°F 122°F 132°F 140°F 149°F 158°F © 2010 KIM LIGHTING - P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91 716-0080 - IEL: 626/968-5666 - FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 a IaM LIGHTING Type: S2 .Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Catalog number: 1 SA / W139SE-2 / 60L3K 12C / DB / Mtg. Fixture Electrical Module Finish Options See pages 3-4 See page 2 WME-LED WARPS-- Small, Electronic LED revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Select polms and Poles Selection Guide. If pole is provided by others indicate O.D. for arm fitting. Specifications WP9SE-LED Small Electronic 60 Light Emitting Diodes Total Max System Watts = 73W Maximum weight: 30 lbs. C* 41/8" (105 mm) (38 mm) (227 mm) FRONT TOP 2615/16'_ (684 mm) 815/6' (227 mm) (26 mm) 59/16" (141 mm) SIDE 4 716" ll � (113 mm) 15" �I L (381 mm) BOTTOM Lens shall be clear glass 'NOTE: Driver compartment door extends down 1" on small housing to accommodate integral step-down transformer on 347V and 480V models only. ED U.S. Patent D568,521, HUBBELL UGHONG.WC. Patent Pending Optics Approvals: Date: 12/15/10 Page: 1 of 5 Housing: One-piece die-cast, low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum alloy with integral cooling ribs over the electrical compartment. Solid barrier wall separates optical and electrical compartments. A single die-cast aluminum cam -latch provides positive locking and sealing of the optical chamber. A one-piece extruded and vulcanized silicone gasket seals the housing against the lens surface. Lens: Clear 3/16" thick tempered glass lens retained by a stainless Steel piano hinge and a single die-cast aluminum cam -latch. fhe edges are camouflaged to conceal the outer portion of the housing. Electronic Module: All electrical components are UL and CSA recognized, mounted on a single plate and factory prewired with quick -disconnect plugs. Module includes a driver, thermal control device and surge protector. Electrical module attaches to housing with no -tool hinges and latches, accessible by opening the lens frame only. Driver Is rated for -40°F starting and has a 0- 10V dimming interface for multi -level illumination options. Optical Module: Precision, replaceable MicroEmitters are positioned to achieve directional control toward desired task. The entire EmitterDeck fastens to the housing as a one-piece module. Support Arm: Heavy cast, low copper aluminum alloy with stainless steel mounting bolts. A pole reinforcing plate is provided with wire strain relief. Arm is circular cut for specified round pole. Finish: Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness, applied over a titanated zirconium conversion coating; 2500 hour salt spray test enduWce rating. Standard colors are Black, Dark Bronze, Stealth Gray , Platinum Silver, or White. Custom colors are available. Warranty: Kim Lighting warrants War 9 LED products ("Product(s)") sold by Kim Li hting to be free from defects in material and workmanship for $ a period of five (5) Musing metal fI parts, (ii) a period of ten (10) years for exterior housing paint nish(s), (iii) a period of six (6) years for LED Light Engines (MicroEmitters) and, (iv) a period of �ye (5) years for LED power components (LED Driver, LlfeShield device, Surge Protector), from the date of sale of such goods to the buyer as specified in Kim Lighting shipment documents for each product. CAUTION: Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with national, state and/or local electrical codes. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. Listings and Ratings UL cUL 1598' CE I IP66 Rated I 25°C Ambient 'Suitable for wet locations. KIM LIGHTING RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT NOTICE. 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 6261369-2695 5646810291 IdM LIGHTING WP9SE-LED WARPS'"- Small, Electronic LED revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Type: S2 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page: 2 of 5 1�t Standard Features Mounting 3Y configuration is available for round poles only. Plan View: �.� Wall Mount EPA: 0.52 1.04 0.82 1.3 1.3 1.5 n/a Cat. No.: il 1 SA ❑ 2SB ❑ 2SL 1 ! 3ST 1 13SY ❑ 4SC ❑ 1 W Fixture Cat. No. designates fixture and light distribution. See the Kim Warp9 Catalog for detailed information on reflector design and application. Electrical Module 'Due to current unavailability of 347V and 480V drivers, specification of these voltages may feature an integral step-down transformer. Driver compartment door extends down 1 " on smal I housing to accommodate transformer. WP9 S fWHousing: —WRPS Size: S=Small, 60 LEDs, 75W E x Light Distribution: Driver: ~ ! ~ E=Electronic Type I Type II Type III Distribution: ❑ 1=Type 1 Full Cutoff « �� W 2=Type II Full Cutoff ❑ 3=Type III Full Cutoff Type IV Type IV -NB* Type ❑ 4=Type IV Full Cutoff Forward No Square ❑ 4NB=Type IV -No Backlight Throw Backlight ❑ 5=Type V Square Full Cutoff El R Right Full Cutoff i ❑ L=Type L Left Full Cutoff Type R Type L. Right Left * Type IV -NB No Backlight - Dimension 1 s/ie" 2675/.- 815/18" (33 mm) L (684 mm) (227" Q 85/is" 1" (2fl mm)713% (25 mm) (175mm) (141 mm) F 60 ce: 60LED's SIDE 4 %e" (113 mm 15'](378'H (381 mm)mm) ' � 6N'J (175 mm) BOTTOM Color Temperature:' '4300K and 6500K are L3K=3500K also available on an ❑ L5K=5100K "Engineered -to -Order" ElL2 K = 580nm - Amber (ETO) basis. x Voltage: Z 120=120V ❑ 208=208V ❑ 240=240V ❑ 277=277V ❑ 347=347V2 ❑ 480=480V2 Fixture Total System Wafts VoltOperating Amps 9 ma 73 120 0.61 WP9-Small 73 208 0.35 9- ma ____73__ 240 0.30 WP9-Small 73 277 0.26 WP9-Small 73 347 _ 0.21 WIRSI-Small7 — 480 0.15 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 ' FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 I4M LIGHTING WP9SE-LED WARPS`- Small, Electronic LED revision 10-18-10 • kim—wp9seled_spec.pdf Type: S2 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page: 3 of 5 Optional Features Finish Color: Black Dark Bronze Stealth Gray' Platinum Silver White Custom Color' Super TGIC powder Cat. No.: ❑ BL 1( DB ❑ SG ❑ PS ❑ WH ❑ CC coat paint over a titanated zirconium conversion 'Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. coating. Consult representative. Custom color description: Wall Mounting A cast aluminum mounting plate is mounted to the wall Cover Plate Cat. No. 1W Select from Mounting on with four bolts (by others). Fixture and arm are mounted to the cast aluminum cover plate before O 1i12'Length page 2. Splice Access 1/4"1mm attaching to the wall mounting late. The fixture -arm- s/4"width g g P Cover aseemm) cover plate assembly is hooked to the wall mounting C, " plate and secured with stainless steel screws 4v4" provided. (13997mm) 9 " Field splices are made at the opening in the cover (<3mm, plate. Cover is finished to match arm and fixture color. 105/e" 83/4" 2899mm) z:z.3mm, Mounting Plate 23/4' (99.9 mm) Fusing (internal only): High temperature fuse holders factory installed inside the fixture Cat. No. (see chart housing. Fuse is included. at right) Line Volts: 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V ❑ No Option Cat. No.: ❑ SF ❑ DF ❑ DF ❑ SF I I SF ❑ DF Single Fuse Photocell Controls Cat. Nos. receptacle ❑ A-25 Two types of photocell controls are available. A receptacle for a NEMA base photocell or an internal photocell button sensor on the Line side of the fixture. Button Volts Receptical Button ❑ A-30 - 120V ❑ A-31 - 208V ❑ A-32 - 240V Mounting (see page 2) lA, 1W ❑A-33-277V 26 ss ElA-35 - 347V *—Fixture with Photocell Receptacle =\ s 1T s r ElA-34 - 480V S —slave unit(s) � s \i*J ❑ No Option 2L 3T, 3Y 4C Lexan® Lens Cat. No. ElLS One-piece flat advanced polymer (Lexan®) replaces standard tempered glass lens. ❑ No Option CAUTION: Use only when vandalism is anticipated to be high. For LED use only. Lexans Lens Tamper -Resistant Latch Standard die-cast latch is provided with a captive 10-32 stainless steel Tamper Resistant Latch Cat. No. ❑ TL flat socket -head screw to prevent unauthorized opening. ❑ No Option NOTE: Required only for vandal protection in locations where fixtures can be reached by unauthorized persons. © 2010 KIM LIGHTING - P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 - TEL: 626/968-5666 - FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 iaM ucHrrrc Type: S2 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC �Optional Features Li Horizontal Slipfitter Mount Cat. No. I I HSF L] No Option Vertical Slipfitter Mounts Cat. No. includes Mounting Cat. No. (See right) L 1 No Option Dimming Controls WP9SE-LED WARPT- Small, Electronic LED revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Page: 4 of 5 Replaces standard mounting arm with a cast aluminum Horizontal Slipfitter fitter to adapt to a horizontal 2" pipe -size mounting end (23/8" OD). The casting has a 5° adjustment to accommodate davit arms that are not horizontal. Horizontal pipe must be field drilled at one set screw location to insure against fixture rotation Finish to Davit -arm with 2" pipe -size match fixture color. fixture mount (by others) Allows fixture or fixtues with standard mounting arm to mount to a pole with a 2" pipe -size tenon (23/8"OD). Minimum 4" tenon length required. Specify configuration (1SA, 2SB, 2SL, 3ST, 3SY, 4SC) 4" round or square aluminum with flush cap. Finish to match fixture and arm. NOTE: 3Y only available on round slipfitter. Cat. No. 19Z�) Cat. No. Mounting Configuration ❑ VSF-1SA E . 1-1SVSF-1SA 1 SA -single arm mount ❑ VSF-2SB Stainless I 1 SVSF-2SB 2SB -2 at 180' 1 VSF-2SL— steel set — I SVSF-2SL 2SL - 2 at 90' C 1 VSF-3ST screws I 1 SVSF-3ST 3ST - 3 at 90' 1 VSF-3SY - 3SY -3 at 120, 1 VSF-4SC Round Square 1 SVSF-4SC 4SC -4 at 900 Kim Lighting is working with several driver suppliers and control system manufacturers to develop a variety of proven turnkey solutions to meet any application's need. Kim Lighting will advise availability of complete control packages, and even two-way monitoring systems, once they have been tested and exceed Kim's high quality standards. Contact factory for further details and current capabilities. 0 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 E WP9SE-LED IdM LIGHTING WARPT- Small, Electronic LED revision 10-18-10 • kim_wp9seled_spec.pdf Type: S2 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page' 5 of 5 NOTES: 1. Lumen loss stablization is a result of Kim Lighting's MicroEmitterTm luminaires exclusive LifeShieldTM Protection System and Dual Heat Management. 2. The LifeShieldTM Protection System will lower the current to the LEDs significantly if the luminaire is exposed to direct heat (sun) or excessive abnormal conditions. 3. Luminaire Lumen Loss assumptions are based on LM-80 results and an actual outdoor product testing based upon 5100K CCT, 350mA drive current. 25°C/77°F tab ambient and cathode temperature at 85°C/185°F. Assumptions past 6,000 hours are interpolated. 4. Cathode temperature baseline is at 850C/1851F. If cathode temperature increases during ambient changes and abnormal environment conditions, % of rated lumens will slightly decrease. 5. Outdoor ambient temperatures are assumed SITU average by geographic region. 6. As Solid State Lighting technology and thermal management systems continually advance, lumen loss projections are subject to improvement. Lumen Performance Charts 110 100 90 80 u b 70 60 v o_ 50 E J 40 30 20 12( H. v E —1 100 a, L E 90 m `o 80 Luminaire Lumen Loss by Hours of Operation Hours of Operation 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000 100000 Outdoor Temperature at 10*0501. Temperature is based on continual average, annual assumptions. Outdoor Temperature at 40°C/104°F. Temperature is based on continual average, annual assumptions. Luminaire Output at Outdoor Ambient Temperatures I � ' � o L ' Stabilizes Output Due ro to Exclusive LifeShield y Protection System � N v 70 -20°C -10°C 0°C IO'C 200C 25°C 30°C 35"C 40°C 45°C 50°C 55°C 60°C 65°C 70"C -4°F 14"F 32°F 50°F 68°F 77"F 86°F 122°F 95°F 104"F 122°F 132°F 140°F 149°F 158°F U 2010 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5646810291 I4M LIGHTING Site Wallforms revision 2/25/09 • swl.pdf Type: W1 Approvals: .lob: Sphinx Development, LLC Catalog number: SW1 / 60LED120 / DB / Fixture Electrical Module Finish Option i see page 2 -- Date: 12/15/10 Page: 1 of 2 Specifications SW1 Model 50 watt HID Medium Base Lamps 60 watt Incandescent 42 watt Compact Fluorescent 00 8" 112Ya" mm) _ j�Mounting Plate r 5'/a" Gasket and (133.4mm) CL r Rope Caulk —T— by Kim 4' Octagonal J-box in wall (by others) SW1 LED Model 30 and 60 Watt LED $" 12Ya" 1�02.2 mm) c311.2 mm) —Mounting Plate " Gasket and (13592mm) Rope Caulk -- by Kim a• 12Ya" (311.2 mm) __1 ED HUBBELL LIGHTING, INC. Head: One-piece cast, low -copper (<0.6 Cu) aluminum alloy, 3/6" wall thickness with external reveal. Attachment to wall is by two bolts concealed within the head. Reflector and Socket: Formed specular Alzak® reflector panel secured to a harness which holds a porcelain medium base 4KV socket (HID and Incandescent), GX24q - Universal Socket (42W Fluorescent), or two single ended twin tube sockets (13W Fluorescent). Entire assembly is removable in one piece for access to mounting screws and is factory wired with a disconnect plug. No reflector provided for LED. Lens: Clear flat'/8" thick tempered glass retained by two stainless steel brackets, and four stainless steel, hex socket cap screws, fully gasketed. Electrial Module: Factory mounted to removable harness within fixture head. Wire leads supplied with disconnect plugs. HID: High power factor with starting temperatures of -20°F. for PMH and -40°F. for HIPS lamp modes.13W Fluorescent: 120V 32°F. starting; 277V 0°F. starting. 26W, 32W, 42W Fluorescent: High power factor with starting temperature of 0°F. LED: A total of 9 LED emitters configured in a rectangular array comprised together as a module. Two (2) modules for 30W version; and four (4) modules for 60W version. Available in Halogen White" (approx. 3500K). Emitters are directly attached to the electronic driver. LED Driver: Constant current electronic driver. Rated for 30W or 60W. Available in 120V or 277V input. -40F. starting temperature. All drivers are Underwriters Laboratories recognized. NOTE: The 120V driver can be dimmed with an off -the -shelf phase control line dimmer (SCR/1-RIAC style). Mounting Plate: Zinc plated steel for attachment to standard 4" octagonal junction box. Gasket provided between mounting plate and fixture plus rope caulk between fixture and wall. Finish: Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness, applied over a titanated zirconium conversion coating; 2500 hour salt spray test endurance rating. Standard colors are Black, Dark Bronze, Light Gray, Stealth GrayTm, Platinum Silver, or White. Custom colors are available. CAUTION: Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with local codes or the National Electrical Code. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. Listin s and Ratin s UL cUL 1598' CE 25C Ambient IP66 Rated Full Cutoff 'Suitable for wet locations 'Dark Sky Legislation Compliant KIM LIGHTING RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT NONCE. © 2009 KIM LIGHTING INC. • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5611709056 IaM LIGHTING 4141h, SW1 Site Wallforms revision 2/25/09 • swt.pdf Type: W1 Job: Sphinx Development, LLC Page: 2 of 2 Q--:) Standard Features Fixture Electrical Module PMH = Pulse Start Metal Halide HIPS = High Pressure Sodium PL = Compact Fluorescent INC = Incandescent LED = Light -emitting diode Lamp Lamp Line Watts Tope Volts 50 PMH 277 NOTE: For lamp/ballast information outside of the U.S.A. and Canada, please consult your local Kim representative. Cat. No. SW1 Site Wallforms Cat. Nos. for Electrical Modules available: U 50PMH120 ❑ 5OPMH277 LJ 50HPS120 ❑ 13PL1201 ❑ 13PL2771 ❑ 42PU 11601NC120 Lam ED-17, ED-17, (2) Twin (1) Triple T-10 Coated Coated Tubes Tube Inside Frost Socket Medium Base Medium Base GX23-2 GX24 -4 — ANSI Ballast Type M-98 S-68 LJ 30LED120 Z 60LED120 ❑ 30LED277 ❑ 60LED277 Lamp LED LED Socket N/A N/A 'Two lamps required per fixture. 242PL operates one 26, 32, or 42 watt lamp at 120 thru 277 volts (50-60 Hz). NOTE: Coated lamps are recommended. Finish Super TGIC powder coat Color: Black Dark Bronze Light Gray Stealth GrayTM Platinum Silver White Custom Colors' paint over a titanated Cat. No.: ❑ BL Z DB ❑ LG ❑ SG ❑ PS ❑ WH ❑ CC zirconium conversion 'Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum uantities and extended lead times. coating on fixture and shaft. 1 g q Consult representative. Custom color description: Optional Feature Textured Glass Lens Cat. No. ❑ TG ❑ No Option Unique textured glass reduces LED glare and improves visual comfort. © 2009 KIM LIGHTING INC. • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5611709056 16. PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach on a separate sheet. NAME MAILING ADDRESS WITH ZIP CODE PARCEL ID Avalanche Development, LLC, 35 Dorset Lane, Williston, VT 05495 0860-1050 Spaniel Properties, LLC, 1050 Hinesburg Road, Unit A, South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-1050 East Mountain View, LLC, 1100 Hinesburg Road, Suite 201, South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01100 Burlington Properties, LTD, PO Box 0210, South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-1020 Jim Doucevicz & Al Senecal, c/o Doucevicz Development, 21 Carmichael Street, Suite 201, Essex, VT 05451 0860-1075 Permit Number SD- 16 - �"? I APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Sphinx Development, LLC c/o Dr. Gamal Eltebbakh, 391 Hillspoint Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445. 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Sphinx Development, LLC c/o Dr. Gamal Eltebbakh, 391 Hillspoint Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445. 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Fee Simple 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) David S. Marshall, P.E., Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., 10 Mansfield View Lane, South Burlington, VT 05403. P864-2323 x310; F864-2271; Contact email address: dmarshall@cea-vt.com 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1060 (1.3 Acre) and 1090 (2.3 acre) Hinesburg Road 7) TAX PARCEL ID # 0860-1060 (only parcel listed) 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 1060 Hinesburg Road: Single family house on 1.3 acres; 1090 Hinesburg Road: Duplex located on 2.35 acres. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Consolidation of two lots into one 3.65 acre parcel to house a 40,261 GSF office building with a 50150 mix of medical office and general office. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 40,261 GSF for the primary building. The Porte cochere on the east side of the building was not used in computing the GSF of the building for use purposes. d) Proposed height of building; Proposed first Floor Elev is 398.5. Height of Building from ls` Flr +_36.0 Top of Building Elevation: 433.5 Average existing grade is - 400.2; Height of Building 34.2'. e) Total parcel size(s) 1060 Hinesburg Road — 13. Acres; 1090 Hinesburg Road — 2.35 Acres for a total of 3.65 Acres f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) This property is not subject to any Overlay Districts. The property is subject to a 50' front yard setback from the proposed Hinesburg Road right-of-way width of 80 feet yielding a 57' setback from the existing right-of-way. The north parcel is currently encumbered by a 20' wide pedestrian easement on the west side and a 20' wide sewer easement on the east side in favor of the City of South Burlington. The south property is encumbered by a 20' wide sewer easement along the south side of the parcel in favor of the City of South Burlington. 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 3.3 % Proposed 8.5% b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 7.5% Proposed 49.9% c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 26.8% Proposed 5.1 % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) A 20' wide sewer easement runs along the south and east property lines. A common access road shared with 1050 Hinesburg Road is located along the north property line. 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) No new extension of municipal facilities is proposed. Existing water and sewer services will be cut and capped in favor of new consolidated water and sewer services for the office building. 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) Avalanche Development, LLC, 35 Dorset Lane, Williston, VT 05495 Spanial Properties, LLC, 1050 Hinesburg Road, Unit A, South Burlington, VT 05403 East Mountain View, LLC, 1100 Hinesburg Road, Suite 201, South Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Properties, LTD, 1050 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 Jim Doucevicz & Al Senecal, c/o Doucevicz Development, Carmichael Street, Essex, VT 05451 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: November, 2011 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knryw)edge. I- '-"� 1 4'� SIGNATURE O ATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: VX11t) I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: 1 J Complete /-omng or uesignee �lv C A 0 i south- urlington PUBLIC WORKS MEMO To: Cathyann LaRose From: Justin Rabidoux, Director 1 Date: October 27, 2010 Re: Sketch Plan #SD-10-31, Sphinx Development, Medical and General Office, 1060 & 1090 Hinesburg Road Public Works staff reviewed plans for the referenced project ("SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC)", dated October 2010, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc.) and has the following comments to offer. 1. It appears that this project will disturb greater than 1 acre of land and create greater than 1 acre of impervious area. Therefore, this project will need both a construction stormwater permit (3-9020 or individual permit) and an operational stormwater permit (3-9015 or individual permit) from the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Stormwater Division. Obtaining these two permits should be a condition of approval for this project. 2. Final hydrologic modeling information submitted to DEC should also be submitted to the stormwater utility for inclusion in a Potash Brook watershed model maintained by the City. 3. Areas for snow storage should be indicated on the plans. 4. Any final decision issues by the DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to maintain the stormwater treatment system in good working condition. 5. Consider including a detail for the level spreader. 6. Consider the use of LID practices within the parking lot to provide pretreatment of runoff prior to discharge into the into the proposed detention pond. The City of South Burlington's Low Impact Development guidance manual is available on-line at: http://www.sburlstormwater.com/downloads/manuals/SB_Low_Impact_Development_M anual.pdf and contains examples of practices that could be implemented (see page 2, 19 and 39 for photos). 7. Sidewalk width shall be a minimum of five feet wide and not three and four and a half feet as plans show. 8. The applicant shall provide a means of access from southeast corner of the parking lot to existing sewer manhole located in the southeast corner of the property for maintenance. 9. The applicant shall provide a means of access to the proposed detention pond and proposed underground forebay. 10. The Lane Press sewage pumping station shall be checked for capacity to handle the projected sewage flow from this building. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.658.7961 fax 802.658.7976 www.sburl.com Physical Address: 104 Landfill Road South Burlington } Sphinx Development, LLC Public Works Review Comments October 27, 2010 11. There shall be a sewer structure at the connection point for the service off the existing main. Given the service connection's location a structure would be needed for maintenance and problem verification. The location is identified on Sheet C3 as "Install Wye and Connect to Exist. 8: SDR 35 PVC". 12. The turning radii where the project drive meets VT Route 116 is excessively wide given the proposed use. At its widest, the curb cut is shown at 80 feet wide. 13. The applicant shall provide sidewalk along its frontage. The location, width and material will be subject to future discussions with Public Works. 14. On Sheet C3 there is a note and leader labeled "Proposed Transformer" in the northwest corner of the property that appears to point to nothing. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and please let me know if you have questions. Page 2 of 2 s September 23, 2010 Mr. Matthew J. Wamsganz Civil Engineering Associates 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: 1060 Hinesburg Road 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road Dear Matt: 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Pax: (302) 864-0435 wvnv.southburlingtonvt.govoffice2.com In response to your request dated September 22, 2010, as to the capability of the South Burlington water distribution system to supply water to the above referenced project we submit the following Preliminary Allocation Determination: 1. Water storage is located at the South Burlington East Tank off Dorset Street in South Burlington. 2. Based upon your allocation request, a water service connection fee according to the City Water Ordinance Rate and Fee Schedule shall be applied to this project. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified at any time by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council. 3. Your water supply requirement for this proposed project (including one general office building with 72 employees and one medical office building with 137 employees less 10% reduction for low flow fixtures) can be furnished by this Department without restricting or encumbering present South Burlington water customers, at this time. 4. Any significant increase in proposed demand or any change in use will require water allocation re -approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 5. Water is supplied to the referenced area through 12" distribution water mains. 6. This Preliminary Allocation Determination shall not constitute a binding commitment of capacity to the applicant and may be revoked by the Superintendent before a final allocation of capacity is granted if uncommitted reserve capacity ceases to be available. A preliminary determination may be used by the applicant that a proposed development has sufficient water capacity available to proceed through the development process. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, South Burlington Water Department W 2k*0-7A- Mike Metcalf Superintendent Cc. J. Fay D. Pratt C. LaRose J. Rabidoux 0 I I EXISTING S RIM-405.1' INV=398.7' I I I I SITE ENGINEER: EXISTING YD I I LEGEN II_D.l / al \ II II I 11 II I I /\r1 � IIII >IIsII I / / \/,/O\ �1YIII y�% —IIIIIIIII —../���/— +/ ��;;; i+—�sS �/ ' \/ / �/, � /!� - /,yd-�/ I II :�.\°.-. •._ /� IIIII //,/5P '/ �\- \ /IiI I I/; -I �I,�TIII'I;;II /�\/1/ \ II ' I I// I /1/ \ , \II LI \; ' / / / J� I\1 / g, \ / -\ � 1 / ../. / , ; \I$I 1 /iI/ I � l'I'II /l1 1 ;i 1II I/ � OE/MRAPSLS/O/YS /J /\/E ,R1I \BFI/ �A�RCEAE I( I/ r -IiII I I I �/ �/I II —�- /�'l�1 n/ l/ � ' �/ \/i\—II/ tG / /�/ �/ /T / ^� /_ �,I -/__/-'/•/ 'l/am/ /®'/..�_/I mI / /� -/ I SPANIEL PNV- 38�5..7�I, 1 ' E/XI/STIN/G 2/ 0S,A/NITA/IIR/Y LCRoME"N PI FAo aB2 EXISTING co NrouR AVAANHE A OF SOUTNf BTMURLgINnTONDEVELOPMENT LLC EXISTING CONTOUR 12.wSST APPROXIMATE PROP ERTY LNE - .— . - SETBACK U CIVAwILl®r EN GINEeORxaNHGaArl SSwxO 2rsCwIeAawTa.eEcseSv ,+e 'n.Im N nC NE G 10MM50DEWIAESOMBGM, VT 0Po - EASEMENT LINE FAX —SS— — GRAVITY SEWER LINEC— TIT®s0 — GAS LINE MJW CURB UE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC i NO —W --WATER LINE DSM —ST--STORM DRAINAGE LINE SEWER MANHOLE DSM SHUT-OFF OWNER: 17 HYDRANT/AREA CATCH BASIN NEIN&TUMINOUS LONG I � �_-_--- COMRETE NION ®YARD DRAIN SPHINX"? I F I PMKNG LOT CIA - /I, lo-v POLE MOUNTED LIGHT BOLLARD LIGHT DEVELOPMENT, LLC HANDICAP PARINQ 391 HILLS POINT HD./ sGN p6PFOR 31BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT .4/ I CHARLOTTE,VT05445 POPOSED// t Y." 1 1 I T / 1 DETENT1gN 3p,- -� 1 / 13URLINGTONPROPERTIES POND i �LI EXISTING SMH // / NIV-J7ae' T LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT: ---------------- I-- / Ji i i / i /' ; > > G/ i i ( , / / �/ / i I 1 \ OWNER OF RECORD & APPLICANT --L I PLANNEDPROPOSE / / i \,,r M - / /' / /� ram_/' i I E / `' jam/ / , - _ - _ L _ _ _ a ' c�F GAMAL ELTABBAKH 1 - r'— - __.Yt - I- / - � - - - - - / - --- _ N a8' AG D 391 HILLSPO/NT RD. 5 co14cRFT�! UNIT CHARLOTTE, VT 0544 ;B ;I 1\ DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT. 1070-1 80 HINESBURG ROAD / I SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 �n?DRalt �� `� I \\\ INDUSTRIAL - OPEN SPACE 1 \ I DIMENSIONAL SUMMARY P FOPOSSI Eip ILD GI \ \ E=MG PROPOED Commit CONDMONS CONDITIONS E5 WALK REQD. I I LOT AREA 3AC 3.65 AC 3.65 AC toFRONT SETBACK 60' 43 57 \ \ / / I \ \\ \ ; ;\\ 7ClURBED 1 \ SIDE SETBACK 36' 33 82' REAR SETBACK 600 340 263 30% 3.3% 8.5% CHEit\ \ 11 I II l I l I r I I I I , I �I 1 91X M0 COYFAAGE LOT COVERAGE 60% 7.6% 49.9% ✓ I 1 / / I i \ I R?0NTYAFI)00NRABE 30% 26.8% 11.3% / *PARKING LOT 10% NIA 10.3% IF RASH cum // GREEN SPACE I ' 1 I I I I I I / LONG TRNVSTIION 1.�, 1 'PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE CALCULATION CURB / 0'� cw I 11 / MAIN PARKING LOT TOTAL AREA = 64,700 sf LOCATION MAP I ; BKiN (rvP. GREEN SPACE IN MAIN PARKING AREA = 8,657 sf 1" = 20W 1, .�. I 1 .05� ✓ I I I I I 4.6 CONCRETE 1 I I I I n4Tx c® aens oN wax d cow \ l I/ PARKING SUMMARY CURB — ly GROSS BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 40,261 st 4. V / 50% MEDICAL OFFICE = 40,261 +2 = 20,131 /Z / I , I I ----- - I 1 I / / 1 20,131 x 5 SPACES PER 1000 = 101 SPACES REOD. I / --- _ .g' R ST / \ 1' - -I I 1 I ----- / /' / NO CURB , �;/ I / 60%GENERAL OFFICE = 40,281 +2 = 20,131 III \I 401 T{'� \ I i 11 1 O g 11 �j I j ©7 // / 20,131 x 3.5 SPACES PER 1000 = 71 SPACES REGO. ._. ----- \ I I 1 1 1 11�1' / _ ( / I p.. C I ..p / - TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED = 172 J Q TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED = 172 \A i I I I I/ I / I 1 / / I SECT I '� SITE // I m(TMER / 1 I PROPOSE s x 18 I I — . T L J BEwcHMArTK I EXISTING SMH IMPROVEMENTS TF� I I PATH I 1 r RIM=385.9' EXISTING 15' BIKE FOR d I I 1 \ INV-379.9' PATH EASEMENT IN RECYCLIIJO I , I I / I FAVOR OF THE CITY I L_._____ _____ _______\h DF ' I 1 \---------- --------- ---------- ----- -- i-- - -- - - --- r------ ------------- /'�- I SOUTH au9uNc PLAN 1 7 1 7 4I ® / / / --------- / fIX. 8- SOR 35 PVC i _ - $5 - - I - SS - -T I L _ \ _ — —11— I — — — — — -SS- — — - _ -SS- f —I -" — m — — — J-FM— SS - � � L CMF O.B' AG I OCT., 2010 oaAmc -ER ReMUNSON GRAPHIC SCALE % %1\' % I EARTHMOVING s�.� 4 / I 1GS �illls ao I CORPORATION 1- 20 C 1 'AID EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC EXISTING SE SANITARY EXISTING SM SEWER EASEMENT IN I eaw. Na. RIM-403.2' FAVOR OF THE CITY INV=398.4' ^ IN FM 1 OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 10169 //7777 1 mae - 20 1L i pg SITE ENGINEER: 1 1 oil RIIA=T38B611 I I ING YD LEGS L uWlli , // I _ ITV=385.7' SEWER EASEMENING 20' T IN I 392 EXISTING CONTOUR I I I I / SPANIEL PROPERTIES LLC & W / / I I FAVOR OF THE CITY / OF SOUTH BURLINGTON I AVALANCHE DEVELOPMENT LLC — — sT 2- N / / I — = = ExlsnNc coNrouR --ST T / //' / / APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE p I CIRF CIWII ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES ITC / • 0.2' AG — — — SETBACK LINE fOMV0i9DVEWLANE, SOITHSAll/GION, IT III 423, / T � 1 _ _ -_ EASEMENT LINE eoaeerffiv FAX eosmaan . IX --- I I S S ! g g g S g / — —SS— — GRAVITY SEWER NNE .0 naaxe ..�..� �� �— ��� _ 5 ' ____ _____ ____ • —G — — GAS LINE DRAM / I — W — — WATER LINE MJW UE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC —S®®T — — STORM DRAINAGE LINE D M SEWER MANHOLE "MO_ DSM SHUTOWNER : HYDRANT CATCH BASIN YARD DRAIN ® SPHINX 'jiRASS� I / ' / / I I I 1 / // ' a-o POLE MOUNTED LIGHT DEVELOPMENT, LLC / ( ISwALe / I r / / / 1 I I I I +y BOLLARD LIGHT BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT 391 HILLS POINT RD. CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 EXISIING SMH RIM0' npW ITV=401.1' I 1 I ( 1 2 f1 / / �I RIM5385.9 SMH / ^'U / / / / ' / INV-37B.9' PROJECT: BURLINGTON PROPERTIES yT / / feaonE ' I ' LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Cf- 9, PROPOSED f\=,' / \ I crF - - - r - - - �- - - - - - - PLANNED - _ - AG UNIT DEVELOPMENT CII 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 I Ili pp* \ 1 q ,. unnESSaMDONOTnAwWTOCOA rRMORRawLsENrALLUM s B LLD G1 ^ \ �F 1 I EOr4T8IU°ON0RA0ACBfITOTNF&A "19dM DISTMOunTTT 1 I F. E3 d8 uUnm�COrn =Aug BEswu iSnRIETiol�iEo� 1 1 �� \ 1 1 \ 4 1 ♦ I I I n coNn"skimLCWACrOUSUEM*,w 723 PWTOAWcoAuncwm mI � I \\ Ir I I I I \ \ \\ 1 I I I I I' I I z TNewxnAcroxs,wr. OsnNBFnAREAsION OROff THE SMASAWIMORNMLCTI1ESuTOFUEOasTn6RON. ALL Br11MAREMSIAlBEWMAIMMORRA1 A."IT'. YwrANA111AMOunaEOFmNSI]XXRONUNs. I 1 I o CONTRACTOR ,waFA riOauntEAuPROPOED unDsrwiB�Eum�e oM1o. a MIAMMTWCMVONTOTARVLLC WUMnEWDM#IACC WCEMMALLN5, �\ cCa\DMe,vDRECCRrOFaamr�MALMMNP.EWWOWSrrAWARos. _ _ — — — 7. THE AWTa 94UL Ew A!E7. aRAocs FpiAll vAYFAENr. w4AWA 9ANO UKN ARFAS 51W1BEafR4T. It IMs IS NOTABOUNOM 1 Ill BNOTWEND 01DBE UMDASONE ' /3y1I FR NTGRAn CRRE1 WFOIROCTOW cTOsCONTECTTHEOMMIRDIR faN "I 11EFORFapIRI[COMTIMMOVIEREMN0FISTOM I ? I' a I I I I I I 1 I I I aAn car. ary 3 or \\ 101 6 -- I sT 8 I a 1 ® © © �RQIEGT SITE T 1 EXISTING SMH I ❑ / \ —�/ / / / I I I I / RV I I RIM=385.9' EXISTING 15' BITE GRADING AND ITV=379.9' PATH EASEMENT IN ---- FAVOR OF THE CITY ' ------ ------------ ----- - ----- -- - '----'�------------------, OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DRAINAGE -- ---- - ---- PLAN \ I 1 _ —ss— — — — - —ss— � — — / — � J I —----r—SS --I— I �— I —/FM— CMF 01Tr ORAIWC NIIYBER 08 AG I OCT., 2010 GRAPHIC SCALE -' 1\' I EARTHMOVING 1" r ^ ^ EXISTING SMH I EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC Ao o MUNSON r, a n EXISTING 20' SANITARY CORPORATION 1,� = 20' c `l RIM=405.1' I EXISTING SM SEWER EASEMENT IN I I Pros. Na. ITV=398.7' 1 I wo RIM=403.2' IX RES) OFVSOUTH BURLINGTON ITV=398.4' 1 10169 S � � 1 Inoh - 20 K \ SITE ENGINEER: EXISTING YD LEGEL ItlI RIM-369.6' SPANIEL PROPERTIES LLC & I nl EXISTING 20' SANITARY I I 3sz EXISTING CONTOUR INV-3R5.7' SEVER EASEMENT IN AVAL ANCHF_ DEVELOPMENT I 1 C - / / OF SO of THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON �L 1 / / // ( I �z EXISTING CONTOUR I / / SST APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE ' /' / — — — CIWIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. SOVM _ - / �_•0.2F AG - — — - SETBACK LINE 10WW3 D*VbVE 9MUM3Tpi, VT OW 7' T — — r .----------------- / /� - EASEMENT LINE aeaaNam FAX eenaeaan e.o:.wa..cmm � / / / n 1 -�;, .'� .. \ I —SS— — GRAVITY SEWER LINE G CAS LINE 01ATfN /� / ; W — — WATER LINEMJW UE - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC —ST — STORM DRAINAGE LINE DSM F I i� TPRM',ORDMER� z-LI. I I l 17 SEWER MANHOLE .PPa9Y® DSM SHUT-OFF I V °� I— — —G$ OWNER: '• I —; I r`I I I�// I / ix HYDRANT i-1 I I. --L--� --�---/'--_i- '1 1 I I / / /// / / I / /'/ / LEVEL ® CATCH BASIN ;. r l I n I I I I __ _; I 1 / / I / ® YARD DRAIN �II / / , / I SPREADER SPHINX I I ( \\ I ♦ i / I I // POLE MOUNTED LIGHT DEVELOPMENT, LLC 1 >R BOLLARD LIGHT N ♦ \ ro :2 ro •a/ I I / / / / / / I I PR POSHD I I ♦ RIM=404.51 INV=b94.5 i , l -- / —� D I ENTI N �\ O BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT 391 HILLS POINT RD. ( i ♦♦ J INV=.S WOND� / I 1 CHARLOTTE,VT05445 EXISTING SMH I Y• u * X /\ sr I / DRAM / RIM-40B.0' I I I (� I 1 INV-401.1' I I / ` E%ISTINC SNH RIM-395.9' \INV-37&9' PR018C L: / \ II fA I BURLINGTON PROPERTIES 1W1°PELIMITED PARs7fy ,1/ / / di / HOPE PROPOSED E NVourCS If ,� I EXISTING S RIM-405.1' INV=399.7' I cl I I I I I / / ram- / --f F "'ice' / ---1- L �_. -see.e CIPF Cs. �r ,— — ,M,w — M — — — - , — — \\ ae AG PLANNED wyoL/r-sear, 7— , Nvoursana/ \ UNIT m ,I II DEVELOPMENT I 119 fr =0 \ \ . sj b I I \\ 1080 HINESBURG ROAD & 070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 I I n\�r� \ \\\ wrj-ssee ° Ory�E \ \ \ Nvour-mo I PROPOSED I \ \ _ UNDERGROUND jp ILD G, \ ` \ FORERAY , -- II I �\ FJEE 36111.5 II - AD I STORM DRAW I \ G7GH�N i 77iENCN(n'P.) I �1 RIM wwV- e fFHOPE I I\ I I I I I I I NVOUr- 7 CBe-- - 1 I nw* aae l J .I I I I / ,S I RIM-XO.e NVOuT-3e&a l V NVyeW 0 �6 T IroNf I I �s¢2s i A �E DAS CS / 1 4GY ✓ NV 1T sr C IRN!- IQ , 1 - I I 1 wn car. rrYHHON r f e ! r- rop I' -may i ss .o. I 11M.p8 o I '\ 1 I I C EAN I III VAL � I ✓ I• i I' INV- •^ice-Oy e•88.�1.e L_- I ` ___T _._ ` // ' i / I1 12' HOrEI ' I i I I I A. l I sr I fe sr -sac qSERWOF 1-4 ,NVfe�sr-see 'E 13' RC sr Rv- \ I — SERVICE — 401. \ I AC I ro I � �,9�77 ca le—, /c/ e I IV \� 1 I ;\ \\ I I \ • \ / / 11 �yh I O,-OPA IN -4Df. e - .e/I I /-I I SITE . _ . _ . AvVGT�6 BE7CHM4RK i�6TD '—_. I I EXISTING SMH r SOR se PLC I , qIM= RIM-395.9' EXISTING 15' BIKE UTILITY I1 II I\ /1gENcrl / / I I , - •a i l FLARED END \\ ' I NV-379.8' FAVOREOF THE CTY - OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAN ----------------- ---- - - - ----- ----------- -- II I I 1 sT Z Sf gI -i 11- SS - I - _ I _ _ I - ----------- -SS- E%. B' SOR 35 VC I 5S - - - - - -, _ - - T INV OUr - - J -�IrT I I _ �__�__ 1-3eE.0 T�FM—- / I Cr 1,rss- G.e•CAG I H1TH HHAIQIC NIIYaHH na I OCT., 2010 MUNSON N#1 GRAPHIC SCALE a OMNsz / 1\` % 1\` EARTHMOVING sc.� I I I RIM=104-0 EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC AIM-aaa5 CORPORATION 1 - 20 C 3 EXISTING SN INVIN=399.0 NVN-9Bfl& E%ISTINC 20' SANITARY u RIM-403.2' IWOUT=397. INVa,r-39&2 SEWER EASEMENT IN I I era1. No. INV=399.4- I IN Fm I FAVOR OF THE CITY 1 Iaos - 20 ft OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 10169 FUTURE SIGN I UNDER SEPARATE APPLICATION I �I EXISTING GAS TO BEABANDONED IT EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED AND ACCESS TO VT ROUTE 116 TO BE CLOSED I EXISTING SMH RIM-408.0' INV-401.1' 7 II I I I I I 1 I� a I I EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC TO BE REMOVED I I I I I � EXISTING GAS TO BEABANDONED I I I ' I " I EXISTING PAVEMENT I T TO BE REMOVED AND ACCESS TO VT ROUT A 116 TO BE CLOSED II I AI II I �I I I I Z Do ' � I I I cc cc I I°I EXISTING GAS TO I BE ABANDONED EXISTING 9 RIM-405.1' INV=39B.7' 46ml'm II \C� EXISTING YE) "I NIV- 85.7' EXISTING 20' SANITARY SPANIEL PROPERTIES LLC & I tf / SE oR EASEMENN OF THE CITY AVALANCHE DEVELOPMENT LLC _ _ sT _ / OF SOUTH BURUNGTGN k12'NDa� --ST i / / 1 / / /CIRF o1FAc 423 EXISTII�'G TREE TO \ I BE REMOVED (TYP� -70.—.— —G iTgBSR01�D XISTING I I I I // ' I / /' G. EL TABBAM �UILDINC / /! /// FF WOOD ELIV.-409.5- / /' Y\, EXISTING SMH RIM-}85.9' / ui • / / / / / / / I / INV-}79.9' _ v 1= s...►/aC / /I / / / / I\ SO. _ BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP IS 460� tyis BE R MOID(71(P.) t / 1 I I I r l I N.I. ` �• / / I I \\ � \�� j � I I j I �\ I I Sim I A / If / I I G. ELTABBA W ----- /I V I I / EI ISTING BUILDING I F CONC. GARAGE I I I 1 �,Ga— — I ELEV.-40s.Y i EXIS NG BU11 ING I I I TO B� REMOVED U II I I II EXIStlNG TRE� TO SBt•5 BE REMOVED (TYP.) I 1s• a I 6 \ I 1 I i / I 1 / 5f If I 1� EXISTING SMH ,/ — �• —' ' / / I I 1 I I ! ! I RIM-}B5.9' EXISTING 15' BIKE - I INV-379.8' 1 I 1 - / , I , I ! \ PATH EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITI \ / }/✓ / I _________I / I I I I I I \ I ----------- i IL V , of south Buauwc I 111 t T f 1 1 7---- T---------1---------- 7--------------- I - \ I \1 '( II I I I // / \7------------- $I P i� wpit ra. I / — L—_95 B sort}SPVG I --qss—r----T—ss—�--/— -- �f 5 jjl _ I I -FM— 77GRAPHIC SCALE / EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC I I EXISTING SMH EXISTING 20' SANITARY RIM-403.2' SEWER EASEMENT IN I o t IN rm FAVOR OF THE CITY INV=}98.4' 1 OF SOUTH BURLINGTON I I >mn - 20 n 0 cc SITE ENGINEER: -10- CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCUTES INC V WA& o 4EWun_ s0u IX&NOM VT Os109 11081N,= FAX BDY.M«H„ -k a=..o.«— Ou" MJW D MS "FROM DSM OWNER SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC 391 HILLS POINT RD. CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 PROJECT: PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 LOCATION MAP J.. zood EXISTING SITE & DEMOLITION PLAN 01T6 OWIRTG NUYHER OCT., 2010 1 " = 20, C4 PROJ. N0. 10169 1 a a 4 a a D �EAST- T SITE SECTION THROUGH CENTER OF BUILDING 5CAL 0 a A O1 EAST - WEST SITE SECTION DETAIL THROUGH CENTER OF BUILDING SCALE: NORTH ST 4 6 I 1 /I JOB NUMBER: D DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: I* NEAGLEY $ CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ICI 1150 Airport Drive PO Box 2283 So. Burlington, VT 05407-M3 ROUTE 116 3 RIGHT—OF—WAY (802) 6588370 65"349 Fax 1060 DINES13URG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT SPHINX DEVELOPMENT 0 U 1 E_ U w o Go y oo U N Q € ao E LL N y LL � ,TAN PATH a 0 � c LL E :XTENSION = E CD � m L O o w co"oE m p H 0)U) a I I �aq O I �a I' RECEIVED DRAWING TITLE: SITE SECTION A NOV 0 5 2010 DATE: 11/05/10 DRAWING NO. City of So. Burlington e D D A 1 2 f { 9 •,; -� 1- -:, 'S 1 -_ t L- t 1 T � � I iF y. - � � F �iS Ft:} t} I _7 i k 3 F-—iTT��-{a`� I T3- T fvs t s7i- I l yl 1. I11 I. III .: I I. _' I r- L1 I :.I• '. JOB NUMBER :.r"TI-I _�;,I' I ,�I f u - D -: h� rI DRAWN BY: • - _ CHECKED BY: I I i I I NEAGLEY $I CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1 I 1 I -------------'----. I __...----_-._--- ----- L ---------- J._L---------'--. I 1150 Airport Dri" PO Box 22:05403 So. BurllnpWn, Vr ,_ .83 (802) 9568320 8660349 Fax 6,_ft-9T ELEVATIONE:/!'-I'-O' 1060 HINESBURG ROAD SOUTHBURLINGTON, VT SPHINX DEVELOPMENT €V 1 1 a 0 CN I,a' ..� !T' �' I '•'. ' �' __-_._-.___-. '•I I�.-I1 „ 1r11I a III _I I= H n OD E U -{ Q LL I', O i0 — - — —E CID c�c -IEEEll F 0 3�11L NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: EAST ELEVATION SCALE: /w-I'-O' SOUTH ELEVATION 9CALE: I/S'-I'-O' a ECEIVED NOV 0 5 2010 9 y of So. Burlington DRAWING TITLE: A BUILDING ELEVATIONS DATE: tUOBHO DRAWING NO. CAVIL EI IGII I E!":RI Ir A'5SOOCIArs1�0. I! IC% 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 August 30, 2010 Ms. Cathyann LaRose, Assistant Planner City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Sphinx Development, LLC Office Building 1060 and 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road PUD Sketch Plan Application Dear Ms. LaRose: Phone: 802-864-2323 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Dr. Gamal Eltabbakh currently owns two properties located at 1060 and 1070- 1080 Hinesburg Road. The characteristics of the two properties are as follows: 1060 Hinesburg Road 1.35 acres Industrial -Open Space District Single Family Residence 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road 2.3 acres Industrial -Open Space District Duplex Family Residence Dr Eltabbakh is seeking to relocate his existing gynecological oncology practice in South Burlington to a new office building. His development company, Sphinx Development, LLC, is seeking to raise the two existing structures, consolidate the two lots and construct a new 40, 261 GSF office building. Since these properties are located in the Industrial -Open Space Zoning District, the office project is required to be reviewed as a Planned Unit Development. We have outlined the primary design and Land Development Regulations compliance issues below in support of the Development Review Boards assessment of this application. Existing Encumbrances - The south property is encumbered by a 20' sewer easement that runs along the south and east edges of the parcel. The north parcel is encumbered by the same 20' sewer easement located along its east edge, a 20' pedestrian easement in favor of the City of South Burlington along its frontage with Hinesburg Road and common access easement in favor of Ms. Cathyann La Rose Page 2 of 6 August 30, 2010 Avalanche Development along its common property line with the same to the north. Access - The two properties currently occupy 374 LF of frontage on Hinesburg Road have enjoyed two curb cuts onto Hinesburg Road (VT Route 116). A third curb cut is shared with the Avalanche/Spaniel property to the north. A previous approval from the City of South Burlington and VTrans allowed for the shared use of this common access by both the Avalanche/Spaniel property to the north and the (formerly) Gamelin property to the south. The Gamelin property was permitted for a daycare use as part of the agreement to construct the common access which straddles the common property line between the two properties. This application seeks to discontinue the use of the two curb cuts serving the residential uses in favor of consolidating all access and egress requirements to the existing common shared driveway on the north end of the property. Proposed Building - The proposed building is three stories tall in which the bottom story is partially embedded below the existing grade. The details on the computed height of the building and how it relates to the 35 foot maximum allowed building height for a flat roof building in the 1/0 District is outlined below. Proposed first Floor Elev is 398.5 Height of Building from 1s' Fir + 36.0 Top of Building Elevation. 434.5 Average existing grade is - 400.2 Height of Building 34.2' We have attached the computation of the average existing grade and the preliminary elevations of the building. The building has a footprint of 13,491 SF not including the 843 SF for the porte cochere on the east side of the building. Total gross square footage of the building is 40,261 SF. The proposed use in the building is 50% medical office and 50% general office. Parking - The computation for the required parking is outlined below. Medical Office Use - 5 spaces/1000 GSF x 50% x 40,261 GSF = 100.7 Spaces General Office Use - 3.5 spaces/1000 GSF x 50% x 40,261 GSF = 70.5 Spaces Total Required Spaces = 171.2 Spaces Total Spaces Provided = 172 Spaces Ms. Cathyann La Rose Page 3 of 6 August 30, 2010 Handicap Parking Requirements 150 - 174 parking spaces = 7 Spaces Required Total Spaces Provided = 7 Spaces All of the parking has been distributed along the periphery of the building in the rear and a small portion on the side in accordance with the City's planning goals. Parking Lot Green Space -A minimum of 10% of the gross parking lot area is required to be buffered with green space. The attached computations show that the proposed parking lot configuration provides 10.27% green space. Lot Coverage - The 1/0 District permits up to 50% lot coverage. The attached computations indicate that the proposed lot coverage is 49.94%. Lighting - The proposed lighting will be provided by a series of lights with a mounting height of 20 feet. IS high bollards will provide lighting along the walkways leading to the entry points of the building. A point grid analysis plan will be submitted with Preliminary plat application. Trash/Recycling - Will be stored in an screened structure located in the southwest corner of the parking. This location was chosen to facilitate access by the users of the building and for ease of refuse truck alignment for periodic removal. Stormwater Management - The site design will utilize the natural topography, which is slightly sloping to the east, to provide positive drainage to a new detention basin that will be designed to comply with the requirements of the State Stormwater Rules and the City of South Burlington Stormwater Ordinance. The parking lot is proposed to utilize both curbed and uncurbed sections so as to allow the water to pass unimpeded to the treatment system while also providing means for snow removal at the north and south end of the main parking lot. Roof runoff and areas immediately around the non -paved portions of the building will be collected and conveyed in one system to the proposed detention basin. The majority of the parking lot runoff will be collected and conveyed to a subsurface forebay and then directed to the new detention basin. Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 4 of 6 August 30, 2010 A portion of the southeast quadrant of the parking lot will flow by sheet flow to a grass disconnection area with slopes of no greater than 5%. This will satisfy the State Stormwater permitting requirements for infiltration of 10% of the impervious surface which occupies the C hydrologic group soils spanning the mid -portion of the site. Peak flow controlled discharges from the detention basin will be redistributed to the main stormwater conveyance path through a level spreader as a means of minimizing the potential for concentrated flows causing erosion of the existing meadow surface. The proposed stormwater peak flows have been balanced and managed so as not to create a net increase to any of the three surrounding properties as outlined below. Eltabbakh Office Building Storm Drainage Summary Peak Flows from Site 1-Year Design Storm (cfs) (cfs) Existing Proposed North End of Property 0.34 0.22 Main Drainage of Property 2.00 1.31 Mid -East End of Property 0.32 0.55 Flow to Burlington Prop. 2.32 2.03 South End of Property 0.83 0.43 Total Flow from Property. 2.94 2.78 10-Year Design Storm (cfs) (cfs) Existinq Proposed North End of Property 0.59 0.46 Main Drainage of Property 3.97 3.04 Mid -East End of Property 0.65 1.02 Flow to Burlington Prop. 4.62 4.32 South End of Property 1.51 1.04 Total Flow from Property. 5.75 5.72 Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 5 of 6 August 30, 2010 Utilities - Water, Gas and Power all run parallel to and on the east side of Hinesburg road. This provides ready access for the project to these public and private utilities. The proposed building mechanical room is located in the northeast corner of the structure. The building will be served by a new 8" connection to the 12" water main and a new gas service will be extended from the existing 4" gas main. A new drop with underground conduit from the overhead power, telephone and cable lines will provide three phase service to a new transformer located outside of the front and side yard setbacks. An air handling/chiller unit is proposed to be located on the north side of the building. This has been located in a portion of the site that will sit approximately eight (8) feet below the existing grade. This will be further mitigated with landscaping. A landscaping plan for the site will be submitted with the preliminary plat application. Landscaping - Currently the site is comprised of approximately two-thirds open meadow. The area around the two existing buildings does include a number of specimen trees. The proposed landscaping plan will show how those specimen trees to be retained will be augmented. For this application, the existing condition plan shows the trees that are proposed to be retained and those that are proposed to be removed. Please find attached a completed application and supporting plans for this proposed facility. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 864-2323 x310. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer \dsm Ms. Cathyann LaRose Page 6 of 6 August 30, 2010 Enclosures: Five (5) Full Size and one 11" x 17" Reduced Size Plan set including: Site Improvements Plan Site Grading Plan Site Utility Plan Existing Conditions Plan Existing Grade Computation Lot and Bldg Coverage Calculation & 10% Green Space Computation Application and Fee ($125) cc: T. Chase (w/ enclosures) G. Eltabbakh (w/ enclosures) CEA File 10169.00 (w/enclosures) PAAutoCADD Projects\2010\10169\Permitting\City\Sketch Plan\LaRoseSketch.wpd APPLICATION for WASTEWATER ALLOCATION *Items marked with an asterisk must be filled in by ALL applicants *APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant: Sphinx Development LLC Contact Person: Gamal Eltabbakh Mailing Address: Ito Hillspoint Road Charlotte VT oti44ti Telephone & Fax for Contact Person: 42ti-,�8ti Property Owner Name (if not applicant): Same Property Owner Mailing Address: Same *Physical Location of Project: 1o6o, 1070 & io8o Hinesburg Road South Burlington VT o540� We,? ignature of Applicant * 'gnature of Property Owner oth applicant and property owner MU sign the application!) *Project Information If the project is a single-family home, please check one: New Existing If not a single-family home, project name: Sphinx Development LLC *Application or Permit Numbers: (from Planning & Zoning office) *SP-10-,31 Engineer's Information for flows over 1,000 gpd Name of Engineer: David S. Marshall P.E. Firm: Civil Engineering Associates Inc Mailing Address: 10 Mansfield View Lane So Burlington VT o J40.J Phone & Fax: 864-2.12-q x310 — 864-2271 PE License *: 6o1q *Flow Calculations (You may substitute an engineer's calculati071 or letter for the information requested below) J For residentinl nrniPeft list nnmhAr of bnrI—,, o —I a --. 4-- _ _-1_ Number of Bedrooms Number of Units X Gallons per day er unit = a.u. Total Flows 1 70 2 or more 210 TOTAL For commercial and industrial projects, list existing and proposed tenants, uses and flows: Tenant/ Type of use Number of Flows per Other Total Business seats, SF, etc X unit Adjustments Flow Existing House Residential i unit 210 gpd N/A 2io gpd Duplex Residential 2 units 420 gpd N/A 420 gpd Total Existing Flows=630 gpd Proposed General Office Commercial 72 Employees 15 gpd N/A 1080 gpd Medical Office Commercial 50 Employees 35 gpd N/A 1750 gpd 87 Patients 10 gpd N/A 870 gpd Total Proposed Flows = 3700 gpd - 20% for Municipal Connection = 2960 gpd Total Increase In Flows 21'10 gpd *Total development wastewater flow requested: 23.-Jo gallons per day Flow characteristics (for commercial and industrial projects) Volume: Total flow of 296o gpd requested (23g0 gpd increase) Flow rate: 6.2 Gallons per minute (during business hours) Strength: Residential Please do not write below this line Application & Recording Fee received: Name Date Receiving Plant: Airport Pkwy Bartlett Bay City Center District: Yes No Approved by Water Pollution Control Department (Commercial and Industrial Projects) Director of Water Pollution Control Date Preliminary allocation issued: (payment of fee is not required) Director of Planning and Zoning Date Final allocation issued: (payment of fee is required, either in full or pro- rated.for projects with multiple zoning permits involved) Director of Planning and Zoning Date Final allocation expires with permit (Date) Zoning permit issued with permit*_-_- (Date) Associated WW connection permit (if applicable) # - - ror extensions of Final Allocation Only EXTENSION GRANTED (Date) 5o% EXTENSION FEE PAID (Date) to (Date of Expiration) (Amount) 4 D D e A ]E•MST ILOO1R PLAN 'ED 110 Ington JOB NUMBER: D DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: I* NEAGLEY & CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY I150 Airport D6ve PO Box 2283 So. Burlington, 105407-2283 (802) M4320 8550349 Fax 1060 HINPSBURG ROAD SOUMBURLINGTON, VT SPHINX DEVBLOPNEE Nf C U 0_ F r` Mo U OD 2 O 10 U � C N a E'6E LL LL j V a _ C LL W Q Q 6 ID` Cto V tj t O ow N p H rn0��E DRAWING TITLE: FIRST FLOOR PLAN A DATE: 11A)SK0 DRAWING NO. 2 3 4 e e 0 + : s 4 e e JOB NUMBER: 0 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: A SECOND FLOOR PLAN GROSS 3UH DING AREA: 13,385 SF I* NEAGLEY & CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1150 Airport Drive PO Box 2283 So. Burlington, Vi 05407-2283 (W2) 65"320 85"349 Fax 1060 HINFSBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT SPHINX DEVBLOPMHNf c U o C ~ U LLI H z N OD a N €$ E LL LL LL E N 7 0 Q04 RECEIVED NOV 0 5 2010 a City of So. Burlington DRAWING TITLE: DATE: 11105KO DRAWING NO. _ S 4 S I.O 3.0 3.0 4.0 i.0 t.0 l.0 8.0 9A I II JOB NUMBER: o I I ! ! D DRAWN BY: II q CHECKED NEAGLEY & CHASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1150 AkpoR DAw -- ee�aR PO Box 2283 NNMM•IY Butlinglon, �92M Fax P Fg- 1060 HINE.SBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT TENANT TMANI SPHINX DEVELOPMENT MPCFmCA- Lorry MECHANICAL -- -- 00 w "off NE USA F. W98F _. � NFTUSA., 0.mw �� = O 60 U cN Q O E� E I 8 i LL 'CO 00 E LE 00 w aq 0 O i� I GROSS M(EASUREID AREA: 12,810 SF I' I SIIAFfS: 874 SF (� 9 ` 1FI,OOR RENTAL3ILE AREA: 11,936 SE I I R `/ E 1 �/ E D FLOOR COMMON AREA: 557 SF FLOOR, USA)33,E AREA: 11,379 SF NOV Q 2010 city of Bo. Burlington DRAWING TITLE: THIRD FLOOR PLAN A A 1 R D FLOOR PLAN GROSS DIJMDENG AREA: 13,385 SF DATE: 1 U05110 DRAWING NO. 2 3 4 S S Sphinx Development LLC Office Building Average Existing Grade Computation Elev Elev Avg. Length 406.9 398.7 402.8 72 29297 398.7 395.4 397.1 78 31099 395.4 396.9 396.2 20 7908 396.9 396.8 397.2 13 5160 396.8 397.5 397.2 8 3174 397.5 397.8 397.7 20 7950 397.8 395.8 396.8 28 11138 395.8 395.6 395.7 78 30872 395.6 404 399.8 72 28483 404 403.4 403.7 86 34744 403.4 401.3 402.4 19 7665 401.3 400.3 400.8 25 10033 400.3 402 401.2 19 7606 402 406.9 404.5 86 34572 Existing Average Grade 400.2 624 249700 First Floor Elevation 398.5 Roof Height 435.2 Total Height Above 35.0 Average Existing Grade (Max. = 35.0') 'Waiver requested for small elevator shaft area which is 1.83' above roof and located in the center of the building. Eltabbakh Office Building Average Existing Grade Computation Elev Elev 405 397.7 397.7 396.3 396.3 397.7 397.7 397.3 397.3 396.2 396.2 396.2 396.2 398 398 403.2 403.2 404 404 402.3 402.3 402.2 402.2 403.3 403.3 402 402 405 Existing Average Grade 400.2 Threshold 398.5 Height above threshold 36.0 Total Height 34.3 Avg. 401.4 397.0 397.0 397.2 396.8 396.2 397.1 400.6 403.6 403.2 402.3 402.8 402.7 403.5 Eltabbakh Office Project Lot and Building Coverage 17 AUG. 2010 159,018 Lot Square Footage 3.65 Lot Acreage 13,475 Building Area 66,534 Main Parking Lot Total Area -89 Island 1 -52 Island 2 -429 Island 3 -260 Island 4 -194 Island 5 -195 Island 6 -195 Island 7 -249 Island 8 -96 Island 9 -192 Island 10 -1,173 Island 11 -1,000 Island 12 -725 Island 13 -400 Island 14 -400 Island 15 -552 Island 16 -631 Island 17 3,405 Shared Drive/Entrance Transformer and Dumpster Pad 5 Dumpster Pad & Chiller Pad 144 0 Porte Cochere Overhang 546 Porte Cochere Concrete Entry 326 West Side Egress Walk 0 Road Sidewalk 833 North Sidewalk 945 South Sidewalk Total Lot Coverage (sf) Total Lot Coverage Total Building Coverage bU Landscape Islands in Main Parking Area (sf) 10.27% Landscape Islands in Main Parking Area Chiller Pad Transformer 23 8 October 5, 2010 Dear Property Owner: Attached to this letter is a copy of the draft agenda for the October 19 2010 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. The agenda includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846- 4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. S&ayrnoJ. Bel it Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Getting you where you s go! federal funds, 25% state funds, 25% local funds, and 25% fare revenue. Without the state or federal funds, the local contribution needed from South Burlington would be in the range of 75% of the total cost of the service. Without this high level of additional funds from South Burlington, CCTA will not be in a position to add fixed route transit service to the SEQ in the near future, unless CCTA receives significant State and Federal funds, which doesn't appear likely. 2) Dispersed development undermines the productivity and cost-effectiveness of existing transit services. CCTA recently made a major investment in high quality corridor service when it implemented the Williston route. The Williston route travels from downtown Burlington to Taft Corners via Route 2 and offers weekday peak hour 15-minute service. The cost-effectiveness of the investment already made in the corridor service can be increased by additional development along the Route 2 corridor in South Burlington. Additional development in other parts of the City that are currently without transit service puts pressure on CCTA to implement more disperse and less cost-effective services. Summary CCTA understands that current zoning allows the proposed type of development along Route 116, but we would like to be on record with our position that this sort of development should be limited to areas along existing transit routes because it has a serious impact on the demand for and productivity of transit service. Development in areas isolated from existing transit service creates a demand for new transit services. New transit services require additional funding, including additional local funds. Decisions regarding development in these areas must be made with full consideration of the future costs to the City for additional transit service. Choosing to develop in areas such as the SEQ rather than along the Route 2 corridor or increasing density in other areas already served by transit also has a direct impact on the cost-effectiveness of existing transit service. Targeting development along transit corridors makes the best use of resources already being devoted to transit service because more people will have access to existing services. The major investment in corridor service along Route 2 should be supported by efforts to target development along this corridor and to allow for increased density. Assuming the proposed development moves forward, CCTA specifically requests the following be included as part of the project: 1) A sidewalk linking the development to Tilley Drive (CCTA understands a sidewalk from Kennedy Drive to Tilley Drive is already planned) and 2) A bus pull=off along Route 116 for the future Hinesburg Commuter route. CCTA would be happy to work with the developer to determine a safe location near the development for the bus to stop. A full pull -off is necessary given the high speed limit on Route 116. To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Meredith Birkett, CCTA Planning Manager Re: Proposed Route 116 Development — Official CCTA Position Date: November 16, 2010 CCTA recently learned of a new proposed development along Route 116 south of Interstate 89 that would include about 21,000 sq ft of general office space and 21,000 s ft of medical office space. CCTA has some specific concerns about this proposed development as well as general concern about continued development in the South East Quadrant of the City. Project -Specific Concerns: 1) The proposed development is not served by an existing CCTA fixed route, but past experience has shown that this type of development creates a demand for public transportation services. The Tilley Drive development, which is in the same area as the proposed new development and includes similar uses, created a demand and a public outcry for public transportation to that area. 2) No current or planned CCTA service will adequately meet the transit needs of the proposed development. a. The demand response Tilley Drive Shuttle offers limited hours of service and is not a robust enough service to serve the transit needs of increased development along Route 116 south of Kennedy Drive. b. The South Burlington Circulator cannot serve locations south of the Interstate with the current level of funding and its half hour running time. A geographic expansion of this route would severely impact the route's on -time performance and the frequency of service to other areas in South Burlington. c. The future Hinesburg Commuter, which will likely travel on Route 116 from Hinesburg to Kennedy Drive, will only offer two AM and two PM trips each day, which is not enough to serve the medical office transportation needs that occur throughout the day. Additionally, if there is any desire for the Hinesburg Commuter to one day stop along this section of Route 116, a bus pull -off with adequate sight lines must be constructed in order to provide a safe bus stop location. 3) There are no existing pedestrian or bicycle amenities leading to the proposed development site. One of the main concerns expressed about the Tilley Drive development was the lack of a continuous sidewalk to the development. Especially in light of the fact that no fixed route public transportation services will serve the proposed development in the near future, walking and biking amenities will be vitally important for those without access to a car. General SEQ Development Concerns 1) There are no existing funds available for expanded fixed route service in the South East Quadrant. SEQ public transportation will require additional local funds from South Burlington. CCTA does not currently have nor does CCTA envision securing federal or state funds for SEQ service in the near future. Normally, CCTA funds service with approximately 25% Page 1 of 3 Paul Conner From: William Wessel [wwessel@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 7:49 PM To: Chris Cole Cc: Meredith Birkett; Steve Magowan; Paul Conner frdbject: Re: New Office Bldg Route 116 I am delighted that we are now integrated into the SB planning process. I have always been a big advocate of this budding relationship. What Meredith said is fine with me. However, SB should change its zoning to restrict this kind of development to bus routes. If it is unwilling to do that we should try to get a side deal with the developer to support an extension of the Tilly Drive service to the new building. If parking is an issue the city could forgive some spaces in exchange for the bus service deal. Also the city needs to have sidewalk to the project. Fair Point already has sidewalk and it minimally should be installed with each new development. The city will have to come up with funds for the rest. Of course a rec path is optimal. The bridge is an obstacle for walkers but not a reason not to do sidewalk. The developer should be required to install sidewalk on his frontage. Disclaimer: I live about a mile south of the bridge and would love to be able to bike or walk to appointments on Tilley Drive. Forty two years ago when I first moved to Highland Terrace friends demanded to know why I wanted to live so far out of town. Now the town has come to me! Bill On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Chris Cole <ccole cr,cctaride.org> wrote: Meredith Prepare an official memo so we can go on the record with the Planning Commission. I'm ok with you attending as well if you want. I'm copying our two CCTA Commissioners from South Burlington to see if their opinion differs from mine. Chris Cole I General Manager Chittenden County Transportation Authority 15 Industrial Parkway Burlington, Vermont 05401 p 802 864 0211 f 802 864 5564 c 802 233 8871 Visit us online at cctaride.orn The mission of CCTA is to operate safe, convenient, accessible, innovative and sustainable public transportation services in the Chittenden County region that reduce congestion and pollution, encourage transit oriented development and enhance the quality of life for all. From: Meredith Birkett <mbirkett@cctaride.org> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:48:44 -0500 To: Chris Cole <ccole@cctaride.or�> 11/16/2010 Page 2 of 3 Subject: FW: New Office Bldg Route 116 Below is the information Paul Conner provided regarding the proposed development on Route 116. As we discussed, our main concerns are: 1) The area where the development is proposed is not on a CCTA fixed route. As we have seen with the but •• not provide any mechanism f• ring additional transit service. No current or planned public transportation services will adequately address the demand created by this development. a. The demand response Tilley Drive Shuttle is not a robust enough service to serve the transit needs of additional development near Tilley Drive and south of the interstate along Route 116. b. The future Hinesburg Commuter will only offer two AM and two PM trips each day, which is not enough to serve the day -long medical office transportation needs. C. The South Burlington Circulator cannot serve locations south of the Interstate with the current level of funding r, its half hourAny • ! of e -t route service southof i Park on Route 116 will required • • andstate/federal•r which there is strong competition ♦ '•W • •' • +•• • • ' • • ♦ imir order to provide the required local match. 2) CCTA recently made a major investment in high quality corridor service when it implemented the Williston route. The cost-effectiveness of the investment already made in the corridor service can be increased by additional development along the Route 2 corridor in South Burlington. Additional development ♦ • • MINA♦ • • disperse • less cost-effective Any guidance regarding responding to the development proposal is welcomed. Paul said I am free to attend Tuesday night's meeting to offer our comments or we can provide a memo that City staff would present to their Board. Thanks, Meredith From: Paul Conner [mailto:pconner()sburl.com] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 2:11 PM To: Meredith Birkett Subject: New Office Bldg Route 116 Hi Meredith, We have received an application for a new office building on Hinesburg Road, just south of Meadlowland Drive (south side of 1-89) and immediately north of the VT Eye Laser building. It is proposed to have—21,000 sq ft of general office and 21,000 sq ft of medical office use. A couple of questions for you: 11/16/2010 Page 3 of 3 1. Are you aware of any existing or planned transit service in that area? If so, can you describe it? 2. Would you like to comment on the application? If so, let me know and we can figure out how to get a copy of it to you. They are at the very beginning of the process. The first public hearing on it will be tomorrow night, for sketch plan. Just so that you know, the building is planned to face Hinesburg Road, with all of the parking in the rear and a walkway built to Hinesburg Road. The Rec Path Committee has not yet weighed in on whether a recreation path should be built along Hinesburg Road in this area. Paul Paul Conner, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 pconner(a@sburl.com www.sburl.com/planning 11/16/2010 SPANIEL/AVALANCHE I i S 8 423' i - t t 1 PROPOSID DETENTI N / I POND1 I I C I I I I i I I I I / 1 I All- l I 1 I -' I � 1 -----� � /I�rs, I I I PflOJECi MANHOLE RIM=385.9' ,I............................................................... r........... r....................................1.......... ..... I .... — — s1 ■■ ■■ ■■ ■0 N■ ■■ ■E ■■ ■■ ON ■■ MIN ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ so ME ■■ ME so Mir '!'!m "' UL IR 1-4 SITE ENGINEER: EXISTING YG LEGEND ^I RIM=}89.8' EXISTING 20' SANITARY INV-385.7' SEWER EASEMENT IN SPANIEL PROPERTIES LLC & Li / / FAVOR OF THE CITY I I 392 EXISTING CONTOUR AVALANCHE DEVELOPMENT LLC — _ 'L / OF SOUTH BURLINGTOIN f\ STD EXISTING CONTOUR o ' SST I7— / � _ _ � APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE I / ' GRASSIAVED / l 1 / / / /// // / ORr — — — SETBACK LINE CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC —_ —� _ _ �(� _ f -� _ _ _ _ --- _ • m�4�F�lnMEWw� sanNRmu+DroR, vros+oa /423, �— ` - EASEMENT UNE eozae4aszs FAX eozaeaun xab: wrcwccan dQQ �YJ SW � � / —SS— — GRAVITY SEWER LINE cwrweac ®solo- .w, wcMrs nessmen — — G — — GAS LINE DRAWN i ST. W — — WATER LINE MJW I I I I 1 \ p I I 10 /' / AlI //I / — UE — — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC caec I I \ n I / I ! DSM —5T — — STORM DRAINAGE LINE QS SEWER MANHOLE DSM SHUT-OFF HYDRANT OWNER: ® CATCH BASIN YARD DRAIN SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC 391 HILLS POINT RD. CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 BURLINGTON PROPERTIES EXISTING SMH I YJ c+ j m - 1 / ' --- / - I I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RIM-408.0' I I I /1 _,/ , .ypY INV=401.1' ❑ I ----I I ST S / / / , / / / / I/i I EXISTING SMH I Q / / JI �y / •:/ / / / RIM-385.9' \INV-378.9' PROJECT: PROPOSED PLANNED AG RECEIVED I / UNIT I ' AUG 3 0 2010 DEVELOPMENT 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & 1070-1080 HINESBURG D City/ Of So. Burlington SO. BURLINGTON, VT 5403 \ Y \ GENERAL NOTES: \ I I + \ \ u \ I >A 1. UTUMSMWRDONGTPLRPGRTTOCONS nREGRREVRESENTAL UTXMES ZO \ /� I Il I 1 \ I \ �L ' I I LOaTFowavORAD.ucrNrromEsuRVEYFOPRE,wsEs ao MUTem' - - _. _ �/ \ \ I \ I \ I L.�C LDaTIOSAREAPPRawwTEONLY R COMTRacroRSwuPILDWJarYALL � I I 13 I Q \ \ \ 1 _ L7IELTYCoxr{.cTSAUDScr+FraNclEssTwuBER"TEDTOMENGWF�x \ 1 \ \ 1 I I 1 I I rn CONTR4CMRMT CONTACTacsaEMWa 7MPMMTOAWcD+SnWMN. G] 10 I \ TrTEcaN/wlcroasR4uRFPawBESTOREAu.asruRernaREUNA'oROPPTTR: SITE? ASA DETECTOR wWiECTRESILTOF THE CONSIRUCTTd/. 1 / 1 I I I I a ALL GRASSEDAREtSSWIIl BE MAWTAwEO UIRR FULL VEGETAMINISESTABUSHEDcr 4. mAmwNA nwxsOursw OFCONSmu.laNLeARs �CaWWMAMRCOMFtETE ao FAr� �B AUP�ROPOSEDUTtuHEs�BEEUMDUKUMNS. CONTWMR RCOUAFV SSETw OMMAANSANDSPECFMIUK T OWUMMADRSNui CCMPLLTETHE woRXwacAMWOEWSTANa RFRMR CONORwIb'AND INE CRYOF SOUM BURIWGiQV PUBLIC WwRASSTAN04RGS. 7. THE TGLFRANCEFORRwaIG014DALL ESFORPAL•EMENr NA"YSAWLAWw I I ! I� /x' /� / 1 -- 'A.vI I ARPwsswwBEaIFEFr J'. / I $1 %/ R TMSSNOTASWAD4 rSLWMAhOSNOTWTENDEnroBELSMASGVE B. IF 7PffliEAREANYCECONUS Oflpti'X7NSA7 WACT nET .WM OR nrcoNTRacmRSlw.LODN7ACTneEMDo+EExroRVERIFTrwTwN `i I `�/ �� t I I / eEFCRexaRNcavTwuEsaNTHEREMwDI,EsrroN. a1 GATE CRK. G.D. , --------------- , / INV= -\ 15• R 403.1' I E ST , 1 H E :. INV=401 9' N I I \I \\ I S 1SFIDPE A — — OJECT I '� SITE ❑ _ — G� / — j / T L C. I EXISTINC SMH I' C K RIM=3iI5,9 I R=385.9' EXISTING 15' BIKE GRADING AND - I INV=379.9' PATH EASEMENT IN I I I / \ I FAVOR OF THE CITY I' I' I ,< I ;� ;DF SOUTH BURUNGTDN DRAINAGE ---------------------------------------------------------- - _ _ PLAN / I \ I I I I / � I II I ____________________r SS— I --I--J--SS------SS—---I — — J 1j, Ir— CMF DATE DRAWING NUMBER �E \ D.e' AG I AUG., 2010 I �APH MONSON 4 EARTHMOVING 1" e EXISTING SMH I I I EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC I CORPORATION 1 — 20 C 2 RIM=405.1' I EIGSTING SM INV=398.Y I RIM=403.7 EXISTING 2T SANITARY enw. ND. u o INV=398.4' I IN FEET I SEWER EASEMENT IN I S FAVOR OF THE CITY L inch - ZO R OF SOUTH BURUNGTON 10169 LEGEND SITE ENGINEER: I I r EXISTNG ro r RIM=389.8' EXISTING 20' SANITARYI I f / < / SPANIEL PROPERTIES LLC & — / NV=385.7 SEWER EASEMENT IN I I 392 EXISTING CONTOUR C�� d AVALANCHE DEVELOPMENT LLC — _ / % FAVOR OF THE cm / OF SOUTH BURLINGTON I / HORS EXISTING CONTOUR ST APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE CIRF - — CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC, T L I-�1 L -J� .—.d 1 - - - — � - �� / ,< / •0.2' A - SETBACK LINE 10"RELDI.IEWUNE, SOUIH&ALI )TON. VTO5403 I w �G BDTd94E929 FAX BIR-0B4Y1)1 xeb: www.csN an / —$ / ry o ¢/y i / ' Tom" \ FLARED ENO EASEMENT LINE I ..�..� SECTION I i // / covrw - v e � O1 I �+ � ./ —SS— — GRAVITY SEWER LINE xT � e m /rye / / / ! —G — — GAS LINE DRAwrvO n r- 17 HOPE ST ST // — —W — — WATERLINE MJW UE — — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC c9ecXED 0 I II I1 I —ST— — STORM ORNNAGE LINE ADPPSROMVDPROPC6ED MAN1RIWS!}ORMER QSEWER HOLE DSM SHUT-OFF OWNER: I ,\ ® HYDRANT CATCH BASIN�I I I I / I I LEVEE YARD DRAIN n / OUT�820 sPREDi 1 1 1 SPHINX i , i li i1 DEVELOPMENT, LLC / D \DEENIQN 391 HILLS POINT RD. PR PO PROPERCOOLING POND BURLINGTONHTIES CHARLOTTE, VT05445 TALLIP L / LIMITED PARTNERS EXISTING SMH VICE2.RIM-408.0' � INV=401.1' ES EXISTING SMH I8 \NV-378.9' 8'DL' // / PROJECT: VG EVE. OVAL I --- _____ / - /' / / _... / / CIE, �._ 15•HOPE / 15-H E a \ PROPOSED � 1S HOPEL741 aPF c —r // P D 1`'L — .\- GO' AG LANNEWATEP 1 , I / CB#2.: ,\ I-_. - \ II l RIAf- +_ ems. I UNIT 8W 3BZ li I TRENCH I ,/ - / ANVW-9901 / / / /N-7 \ '""our - DEVELOPMENT YID 01 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & 1Y I C•B/,'\I 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD / 9YTA i / \\ \ \I ( SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 i INVIN-388.f PROPOSED INVOUT-398.0 \ UNDERGROUND,co (Y FOREBAY co In \ \ RECEIVED In(10 I \ I YD #4 \ \ \ RIM=397�� > 1 I I IINV=392.8cc 1 I I I \\ AUG 3 0 2010 City of Soy BUdin ton ! — I 1 ------ I 9 J / ''t l sTORMORAIN P, 1 ' YD#8� I TRENCN(rYPJ 5"v :70 �/ �'sT $ `� =3�2.C.00 . � I a>' 1 , I\ I I / DATI COILI I SION I $s / I BEAN ST INv- II i i �/ I"-�i��_\ -,� 1 77 i. i TRENCH 40J.1' I E 15' R ST / INV-401.9'\ yJ ST I yp#5 1 q 115'HOPE I I I I \I \\ V I I 1 RIM=339y5.5 \ I \ I I I YAW DRAW II INv 15 •.1 ,I I / i' // I I \J I (� - 1-1, 1 / (ryp•) // �q I INSTALL YlYEAND CATCH BASIN I // TI CI / I / , / I •'.I s J ,, , #8 '.. CONNEC iO EXIST.-7 / d• \ I _ / ' I / 1 ep R8N-392.8 I B' SOR C DB #5 1 RIM-988.7 / INVOUT=390. I INv==f B INV IN-387. 1 ' ICUECT I I SITE / ^ Gi / !— — _ .I— — — _ _ __ 1._ __ J BE•PICHMARI( — INVDOi= EXISTING SMH RIM=}85.9' EXISTING 15' BIKE I PATH EASEMENT IN UTILITY INV-379.9' � FAVOR OF THE CITY IIII /� r I / I ' I I I I \; ____J_ ___________ \ I ,t__________________�OF SOU1H BURLNCTON III , t ------ I--- ----------- - T-------- r-------- I _\> ---; - --- . PLAN -ss- — —I— - -�- — -SS/ — — — -SS SOR 35 PVC I ——Ij-_-SS- �FM— -- -- q QBCUC I DATE DRANNG NUMRER I J CT MUNSON AUG., 2010 pa a 11. b ., 1\' / 1\' I EARTHMOVING 1�AEE 20 EXISTING SMH I I I EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC EXISTING 20' SANITARY CORPORATION C 3 RIM-405.1' EXISTING SM INV=398.7' I SEWER EASEMENT IN I I RIM-403.2' FAVOR OF THE CITY I PR- NO. $ INV=398.4' I IN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 10169 1 Inch - 20 tl FUTURE �S/G� UN�IE=( y, \ yl I I I EXISTING GA 1�0 I BE ABANDOIjIElJ III I I I I II I �I I I 1 I 1 I 1 EXISTING PAV��jIj M TO BE REMOVED ACCESS T VTI RO E 11 TO BE CLOEq I EXISTING SMH RIM-401 INV=401.1' II I I I I I i EXISTING YD I I RIM-3B9.6' / / I =1 INV=385.7' EXISTING 20' SANITARY / SPANIEL PROPERTIES LLC & SEWER EASEMENT IN I I / d / FAVOR OF THE CITY AVALANCHE DEVELOPMENT LLC — _ sr _ 1z_G OF SOUTH BURLI G N I / / _ _ST / I / / / / / /JI / C.RF ' r ' AN,< NE EXISTIOG TREE TO ,,,Ayr "°r`•. \ \ \\ \\ I R.r n BE REMOVED (1YPI) 1 ° m 1 EXASTI&G BUILDIN i r I j T0I'll I REII¢011ED _�• , ssXISTNG G. ELT4E�AKH i QUILEING / FFW000 BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP E%IsnnG sMrl RIM�3B5.9' \INV=378.9' �I . /STING O H I I NI I I E EC RL�RIC T \� B ,10V C III �l EXIST G �AS T EE BE DIONE (C) T cc I I EMS UNGIPAVE -NT— TOBE OVIOAND I 1 ACC SS 10 WE 16 TO I �I PI I I l I INV- II i —N 403.1'I / IV=401.9' 12 EXISTING SI RIM=405.1' INV-398.7' L4- 1 11 III I\ I I I I � LISTIN/ I RIM=40 INV-39 I ,u1c I — / / r / / / / � — _ / / _ _ L �_ _ C/PF a8' AG ' G TbtEE TOE BE R MOV D OP.) I 1 % / // ; \\ /// G. ELTABBAKH / ---- 1 / I E ISTING BUILDING I I °ry"`rl I / 1 I I I // I I F GARAGE' I I EXISTINGBUIIDING I I I 1 11 I I I I TO Bi ED EX/S#NG TRE# TO I 1 1 I BE RIEMOVED I(TYP.) I 1 1 I RECEIVED AUG 3 0 2010 SITE ENGINEER: r CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIA7ES, INC, 10 WASFELO VFWIANE SOUINRUR(NGI VT DW E°Eaa-zs= FA% EOPa°4 . www.,.e.- — CCP—GRT © zC - DRA11N MJW CBECI(ED DSM APPROVED SAV OWNER SPHINX DEVELOPMENT, LLC 391 HILLS POINT RD. CHARLOTTE, VT 06445 PROJECT: PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1060 HINESBURG ROAD & 1070-1080 HINESBURG ROAD SO. BURLINGTON, VT O5403 City of So. Burlington I LOCATION MAP _ I DATE I CM I R—ON I ' j', ;WOJECT _;; I 11I EXISTING BENCHMARK T r r MANHOLE EXIST NG SMH ; I J RIM=38.9' EXISTING F1E5T' BIKE INV=378.9' PATH EAS ITY SITE & FAVOR OF SOUTH BURLNCTON T-------------------- -----------------_-___-_I_________/ I _________I _____ _______________— — = DEMOLITION W ______________ �-B*_ R35PVC —SS—PLAN FM— _�I-- O • .� — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r CMF J DATE 0—ING —ER 0. 'AG AUG., 2010 APH0 1. I Vs p p EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW LLC EXISTING 20' SANITARY C4 I " = 20' I SERER EASEMENT IN I I PRw. ND. 1R R� r FAVOR OF THE CITY 1. huh � ED R OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 10169