Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-95-0000 - Decision - 1020 Hinesburg RoadFINDINGS OF FACT & DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. for the construction of a 50,000 square foot addition to an existing 82,700 square foot light manufacturing facility (Dynapower), 1020 Hinesburg Road. On the 12th day of September, 1995, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the request of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. for revised final plat approval under Section 204 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations based on the following findings: 1. This project consists of the construction of a 50,000 square foot addition to an existing 82,700 square foot light manufacturing facility (Dynapower). This is an amendment to a planned unit development approved on 1/26/88. The sketch plan was reviewed on 8/22/95. 2. This property located at 1020 Hinesburg Road lies within the IO District. It is bounded on the north by Lane Press and I-89, on the east by undeveloped property, on the south by the undeveloped Green Acres industrial subdivision, on the west by Hinesburg Road and several residences. 3. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 30 foot curb cut on Hinesburg Road. This access also provides access to Lane Press and the Green Acres industrial subdivision. A portion of this access will become a City street (Swift Street Extension) when the industrial subdivision is developed. One of the original conditions of approval was that when Swift Street Extension is built, the parking lot shall be accessed to the street and the temporary northern access be abandoned and seeded. This is shown on the plan. Another condition of the original approval required the intersection of the Lane Press/Orchard Lake driveway and Swift Street Extension be made at right angle when Swift Street Extension is built. This is shown on sheet SA-1. 4. The portion of Swift Street Extension located on the applicant's property was approved as 60 feet in width in 1981 and was approved as 80 feet in width in 1988. An Offer of Irrevocable Dedication was submitted for the 60 foot r.o.w. but was not revised when the width was increased to 80 feet. Applicant should dedicate 20 additional feet in order to comply with the 1988 approval. The 80' r.o.w. should match the 80' r.o.w. approved on the Green Acres parcel to the south. The plat should be revised to show an 80' r.o.w. Circulation is adequate. Circulation is adequate. 5. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 3.4% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 6.1% (maximum allowed is 50%). Front yard coverage is 5.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. 6. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $18,770 which is not being met. Proposed landscaping, which includes Ash and Pine, is $14,800 short of the minimum requirement. Applicant requested a credit for existing landscaping to make up the shortfall. The applicant planted 110 apple trees to satisfy an Act 250 requirement. These trees were above and beyond the landscaping requirement needed for the existing building. The applicant requested that these trees with a value of $21,450 be used to make up the landscaping shortfall for the addition. 7. Parking: A total of 100 parking spaces are required and 161 parking spaces including six (6) handicapped spaces are being provided. A bike rack is being provided. 8. Traffic: ITE estimates that the current facility generates 81.05 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour and with the addition to generate 130.05 vte's for a 49 vte increase. The applicant paid for 120 vte's as part of its 1/26/88 approval. No additional fee is required under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance for the 10.05 vte difference between vte's paid and the proposed vte's. 9. Sewer: No additional sewer allocation needed since the sewer allocation granted at the original approval exceeds the requirement with the addition. 10. Sidewalk: The applicant contributed to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund as part of the original approval. 11. Scenic View Protection Zone: The location of the Hinesburg Road North Scenic View Protection Zone is shown on sheets SA-2 and Cl. Sheets SA-1 and the plat should also show the location of the scenic view protection zone. The proposed addition is not located within this zone. The antenna structure, for which a zoning permit has not been issued, appears to be located within the scenic view protection zone. 12. C.O. i along I-89 the plans. sheet SA-1. District. one: Portions of the property along Potash Brook and are located in the C.O. District and this is shown on This C.O. District should also be shown on the plat and The proposed addition is not located within any C.O. E 13. Lighting: Existing lighting consists of the following: --- eleven (11) 400 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting and shielded fixtures mounted on 20 foot poles. --- nine (9) 250 watt building mounted lights with downcasting but not shielded fixtures. Proposed lighting consists of the following: --- one (1) 100 watt building mounted high pressure sodium lamp with a downcasting and shielded fixture. 14. The Planning Commission requested at the sketch plan meeting that all new building mounted lights be downcasting and shielded and all existing building mounted lights located on the southeast side of the building be replaced with downcasting and shielded fixtures. Plan should be revised to show all building mounted lights and indicate lights which will be changed to downcasting and shielded. 15. Other: --- sheets SA-2 and Cl should be revised to correctly show the location of the fire hydrant at the northerly corner of the building. --- sheets SA-2 and Cl should be revised to show the correct number of pole lights in the parking area. --- sheets SA-2 and Cl should show the locations of the windmill tower and antenna tower. --- the two (2) trailers located in the parking area should be relocated. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the revised final plat application of Wiemann- Lamphere Architects, Inc. for the construction of a 50,000 square foot addition to an existing 82,700 square foot light manufacturing facility (Dynapower), 1020 Hinesburg Road, as depicted on a seven (7) page set of plans, page two (Sheet Cl) entitled "Dynapower Proposed Addition Overall Site Plan, 1020 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated July, 1995 last revised 8/24/95, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The final plat plans shall be revised prior to recording and prior to issuance of a zoning permit as follows: 3 a) The survey plat shall be revised so that note #3 correctly references volume 176, page 510. b) The survey plat shall be revised to show an 80 foot wide r.o.w. for that portion of Swift Street Extension located on the applicant's property (from Hinesburg Road to the Marble Bank property to the south). This 80 foot r.o.w. shall match the 80 foot r.o.w. approved on the Marble Bank property (formerly Green Acres). c) Sheet SA-1 and the survey plat shall be revised to show the location of the Hinesburg Road North Scenic View Protection zone and all C.O. Districts. d) Sheets Cl and/or SA-2 shall be revised to show the location of existing and proposed building mounted lights and indicate which lights will be changed to downcasting and shielded as required by condition U . e) Sheets SA-2 and Cl shall be revised to correctly show the location of the fire hydrant at the northerly corner of the building. f) Sheets SA-2 and Cl shall be revised to correctly show the correct number of pole lights in the parking area. g) Sheets SA-2 and Cl shall be revised to show the locations of the windmill tower and antenna tower. 3. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. All existing building mounted lights located on the southeast side of the building shall be replaced with downcasting and shielded fixtures. 4. An Offer of Irrevocable Dedication shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording which refers to an 80 foot r.o.w. for the portion of Swift Street Extension located on the applicant's property. This legal document shall be recorded prior to recording the final plat plans. 5. The Planning Commission grants the applicant a landscaping credit of $14,800 for the 110 apple trees planted to satisfy an Act 250 requirement. 6. The applicant shall post an $18,770 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 7. For the purpose of calculating required road impact fees under 4 the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed addition will generate 10.05 more vte's than the number of vet's approved and paid for in 1988. 8. The applicant shall obtain all necessary City approvals and permits for the antenna tower prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the addition. 9. The two (2) trailers located in the parking area shall be relocated from the parking area to a location approved by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. 10. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chairman or Clerk prior to recording. The final plat plans shall be recorded prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Chairmari or Clerk South Burlington Planning Commission /64 �' �Date 5