Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0800 Hinesburg Road8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 754,024 Existing 4.6 % / Proposed 4.6 % / Sq. Ft. 34,927 sq. ft. 34,927 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 25.6 % / 193,094 sq. ft. Proposed 25.6 % / 193,094 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing N/A % / N/A sq. ft. Proposed N/A % / N/A sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) None * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 0 Previously approved b. Landscaping: $ 2,000 Previously approved c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): Relocate previously approved transformer/vault on north side of building. 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): N/A 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N/A 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 2/29/16 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the ti o submitting the,/site plan a placationiin accordance with the city's fee schedule. U �� d OV/6 A Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 Novewber 16, 1983 Mr. Donald MacKinnon New England Telepl-lonp Comany 245 State Street Boston, Plassachusetts 02190 Dear �$'r- NlacKinnon: Be advised that your request for a variance has been granted approval by the Z;oning Board Of Adjust Tent The ward will issue formal findings at a later date. We should continue with site plan approval as soon as possible. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. PO ve very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mg In accordance with the Soum k,rgulOtions guru ton Z117, Tide 24 V.S.A. .g 117, ` and CSouter Burlington.ihold a I the r ofrd ofAdtustrro will hold o public h.-ing, at pffces CO^ rim" Mu^io 575 ' Pot pprset ference Room' • Verin Street, South &rr ovem�ber 14 f '+ itcla on Mandt' 119 fotlat 5itb P.M• ro conside N 1 lo- ApPeOI ' of Nt9el Muc ctio seekingg o vdrti 0. from. of the 19.652 MultiPleR usea 5puth Burlin9tO^ , o�wphons. py st is for n^jjy1O^ t0 pccOtO pe (ding as a Phoro- pn existutg bow, containing 1 303 th grpphic rota contunction `M i ��ro storage areas, rpet store and at 572 Dorset Stt°Ot. N2 Appsol °f` WiiN'wm Sheorer seeking a vorianceI from . }1On Dimensional regw 18.00, gwiington Regulo- ttiio� Rogquue$ it for p5 h tdock to constructconstruct 0 12 h. feet of within �ayy^dskim alf IYarrd at 66 BartlaAt BOY Road of Alan Polmer see NnSgA POCOSection Vaariance, "1° 1 20, Cond'nwwRl I I . S Ro S. Ra South 5urh^9tO^ ,s an to oc Yg quest is for 0 h� Bro �1 oge"c an existing Y Os On Ill other oxiii, in WilFstoriRood• f t, pf C�rch•,oI Jesus _ k Christ5n see a�vanoncDoY 4 Section 1 112, Height of structw ti s i struct s sa sWt is � I1O � feet, i at 400 Swih Stree NS ApfjsOl Of New EMglOr'daOn1od r.p� oc Come°^Yng 0. Variance, ` Mac�m^Oo16.10, Permitted from `1jp°• 19.652 h1dnPle uses and SedtO^ n Reg- s tract a 38• Sion ant%acnc g age m co foot with a 55000 sAtjOro con- Ce complex o�°0 jg acres.roxi toa+k+g apPso y of 1.89. Boo" tocoted HiraAsbppw9�R�pOd- ^�Q�°�, Inc., D°vwef�°e^o^'M��`ction Mkfnp 06 8 20, oval. fraomm, of the South CondrtioociRegulanons. Request Is BtxfngtO^issio^ to con H- on0 for I50 h.x 80. facility fow cpntmmn9 Parcel acres,of Dorsef and located of Gordan Woods' 07 At . a,prev01,1 uses Section 19.0 9.056 eite^� Of orb secSouth Bwll 9ton Wogul o can, �o addition�tp cat- Request is 121 .9 . xurt areal to the IaddihO"°IsocKpa off *,o exist ri struc- tau". at Olyptad. 70 For* p^ve. Rictiaard Caron NB APP°o1 � ai, from Section i ° fOtpttpl uses svbst�he soek'ng 19.05. Cot>d' oxtenxon, of Re - South ton Rag j" t fission t°, con- quest i 48 hPxefS0 h. addition to struct y5 h.x 54 H. , an - 611 ed at 615 Airport +� "We, toc parkwaY• _ Rkha'd Word. �n�ng Admini"atrvs Officer i r 29, 1983 Ii Nei a October 31, 1983 Mr. Donald MacKinnon New England Telephone Conpany 245 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02190 Dear Mir. HacKinnon: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the Municipal Offices, Conference RcKxii, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, November 14, 1983 at 5.00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this hearing. Ver,,,7 truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer W/mg NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant New England Telephone Company (contact person Mr Donald MarKinnnnl �� 5 State �tYPPY RnQtnn *"^ - (Fi17) 57L-11�Q3 Name. -address of property owner Tilley Helen M. 700 Hinesbur Road S. Burlington, VT 05401 Property location and description Hinesburg 'Road S Burl;ngi-nn, vT Corporate Office Buildin I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: di r:lAna l Use variance-e€€ieer• I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pdy the hearing fee' of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. 11-14-83 Hearing Date Signature o, Appellant Do not -write -below -this -line ------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: �.�./�' �:r •'''ter ,'' '' ,��''��"� ,•+'t,�t,,,�...,-r,c. �„� „�J Appeal of '' r seeking a--_,,, from Section �+w, 1% !. ya. / _.�'• r. t u..�.,..,/ of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to oyl ?0.�-L­o A-0 a 6.�+f�'� �+�'fr't-,4�w.., .� ��^b�- 1 L!' j_..e- z,..., ,- £" �. � r ��.�:..+� .d y,. .. y� a .,�t}".r'� �.L..✓'vc-+'yam' �. 56 / Caw 71 ✓+� `� I Cr, _, C A`°'r, - .G� �'Y� - 7v�1 ya 1 W. �'�, :., a rx1 to Rece ived BY Date Application Completed and Received B - ----- - -- - -- By CITY OF SOM11 BURLI NG`PON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEjv 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record _-ftew Engianda ep one o y '�"�� ,�,�� �.(F,L,� M 245--st-ft- Street (b) Applicant 1aes•v -t'e.,Er 4ot-1e (c) Contact Person Mr. Donald MacKinnon 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont 3) PROPOSED USE Corporate Office Building 4) SIZE Of" PROJECT (i.e., # of units, floor area, etc.) (office) 55,000 sqa ft (garage) 16,000 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 300 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings 4,100,000 (b) Landscaping 100,000 (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) $325,000 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT C(ri1PLETI0N DATE December 1, 1984 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) -349 , 4c'a 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Monday -Friday City of South Burlington 1175 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 ,i TEL. 863-2891 May 21, 1975 Mr. M. Keith Wright 900 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Keith: At the request of South Burlington Planning Commission member Mrs. Mary Barbara Maher I am writing to explain the various options that are available to you, under the existing zoning regulations, for the development of your land located south of Interstate 89 and east of Hinesburg Road. Presently the land is zoned Agricultural -Rural and you are offered the following options for possible development: 1. Farming and agriculture 2. One single family dwelling on a minimum lot size of 10 acres 3. Planned Unit Development Please refer to the attached zoning description for the Agricultural -Rural district to better understand the uses permitted in the district. If you have any questions please give either myself or Dick Ward a call and we will be glad to answer them. Respectfully, Fred Mitchell, City Planner I 000000000000000000'',D00000 '-f o r- Q " i o�pp000cy o0000000000000� 000ci C r� e No Text ar 3oard commercially developed by the owner for recreational uses )ec. or purposes. 4.10 Permitted Uses subject Any area of land currently owned, under option, lease, or easement by the City for the purpose of active or passive recreation, nature conservancy, or open space, and the use and maintenance of which land is under the control of the or City for such use and open to the public shall be designated 3, or Park and ;recreation District under this ordinance. Lstrict. Any area of land hereafter annexed by the City through lamage purchase, o_r.tion, lease, or easement for active or passive recreation, nature conservancy, or open space shall be and placed wider administrative control of the City for such use and opened to the public and shall be considered for inclusion within the Park and Recreation District under ;h this ordinance )wed ipon Any area of land in the City commonly owned by private smittee. individuals and convenanted for use as co-mon recreation, 4 open space, or nature conservancy land shall be included 1 in the Park and Recreation District. .owed )on ARTICLE V AGRICULTURAL RURAL DISTRICT (AR) )pace .1 5.00 Permitted Uses The following uses are permitted in the Agricultural Rural District. Any uses not expressly permitted are prohibited except those uses which may be allowed as conditional uses as set forth hereafter. 5.001 Farming and agriculture, and the raising or keeping of Poultry, cattle, pigs, horses, or other domestic farm animals. Lnd 5.002 One single family dwelling on a lot in excess of lease ten (10) acres. under 5.10 Conditional Uses The following uses may be permitted in the Agricultural Me Rural District as conditional uses by the Board of Adjustment in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 13.10. 5.101 Churches, educational facilities, and parks (not to include amusement parks). Such facilities shall be permitted as conditional uses only on a major street or collector street. - 5- 5.20 Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements In the Agricultural aural Districtq any requirements of Sec. 11.00 governing; lot size, frontage, setback lot coverage and density shall apply. ' 5.30 Planned Unit Development - Residential Planned Unit Developments - Residential are hereby permitted to encourage new residential communities, innovation in design and layout I and more efficient use of land. Planned Unit Developments - Residential shall be permitted within this District in areas serviced by municipal water and seiver. Should any developer wish to connect to municipal services at his expense he will be permitted to do so only if the area is one in which municipal services are projected in the proposed capital budget program or unless it has been determined by the Planning Commission and City Council that all requirements of Sec. be met by the developer taking into consideration the will proposed development and any other proposed or planned i development. Accordingly, the modification of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations by the Planning Commission is permitted simultaneously with the approval of a subdivision plat subject to the conditions set forth herein. 5.301 PUD-R may be approved only in the Agricultural Rural District as designated on the Official Zoning Map. 5.302 Water and sewage facilities for the development must connect to existing city water and sewage systems. 5.303 All dimensional reauirements set forth in Sec. 11.00 may be varied by the Planning Commission. 5.3 04 Specific Standards The following standards and conditions shall be observed: a. Minimum total area of development - fifty (50) acres. b• Ila-ximum average density allowed - two (2) units per acre. 5.305 Permitted Uses Permitted uses in a Planned Unit Development- -6- Residential may include and shall be limited to: of a. Variations of dwelling units in detached, attached Semi-detached, or Multi -story uctures, not to exceed 22 stories in height.. 5.306 The Planning Commission shall be authorized to increase densities by rmitted in a maximum of 10% for purposes of permitting land to be used for low-cost Provided 10% of the units are low-costhousinelasngs defined in Sec. 15.116. g fitted a ter 5.307 Maximum of a single curb cut or road.o e unless otherwise p Wing per, lot d a pproved by the Planning Commission. to 5.308 All PUD-R's shall be evaluated according g to the General Standards or of Sec. 12.002 (A). ion will ARTICLE VI 3 RESIDE'-TTIAL DISTRICT5 R1 - R4 R fitted The Residential District shall be separate districts designated according to the number of dwelling units permitted per acre as R1, R49 and R7. 6.00 Permitted Uses ming The following uses are Districts. Permitted in the Residential Any uses not expressly permitted are prohibited. 6.001 Single family dwellings in R1. 6.002 Single and two-family dwellings in R)+. 6.003 Multi -family dwellings in R7. 6.004 Agricultural for the benefit of the owners residents of the and property. 50) 6.005 Public utility facilities, services and buildings Provided that the hoard x of Adjustment finds that public necessity requires it, and that all lines transformers and sits valves are underground or ' completely screened from public view as determined by the Planning Commission. E 6.006 Medical and dental clinics. -7- {P 4 or uses for living space; usable floor area shall be computed by measuring the outside dimensions of the building. 11.85 Height of Structures and Lights No structures shall exceed 35 feet in.height or 2� stories 4 without approval by the Planning Commission after public t hearing. Lighting shall not exceed the height of the of highest building on the property, without approval :by the Planning Commission after public hearing. i ARTICLE XII h PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPPENT ses dary` 12.00 In accordance with the provisions of 24 VSA 4407 (12), trip Planned Unit Developments are hereby permitted to encourage innovation in design and layout, and more efficient use of nse land. Accordingly, the modification of the South Burlington n. Zoning Regulations by the Planning Commission is permitted simultaneously with the approval of a subdivision plat s subject to the conditions set forth herein. here to 12.001 Planned Unit Development may be approved Residential 4-PUD as designated onthe Off Official e 1 Zoning Map. uto i i 12.002 Standards and Conditions The Planning Commission shall evaluate any proposed Planned Unit Development according to the following standards and conditions: re A.- General Standards to said 1. Will not result in undue water or air t pollution. In making this determination ties it shall at least consider:: the elevation )r of land above sea level; and in relation to the flood plains, the nature of soils and subsoils and their ability to adequately support waste disposal; the slope of the land and its effect on effluents; the lily availability of streams for disposal of ,f effluents; and the applicable health and ro water resources department regulations. 'eet 2. Does have sufficient water available for y the reasonably foreseeable needs of the subdivision or development. -21- e M 3- Will not cause unreasonable soil erosion or reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water so that a dangerous or un- healthy condition may result. 4. Will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways existing or proposed. Plan must be approved by City Engineer. Y 5. Will not cause an unreasonable burden on the ability of a municipality to provide educational services. 6. Will not place an unreasonable burden on the ability of the local government to provide municipal or governmental services and facilities. 7- Will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area,,, aesthetics, historic sites or rare and irreplaceable natural area, and conforms to proposed pedestrian trail system. 8. Is in conformance with any duly adopted local or regional plan under Chapter 91 of Title 24. Housing types, costs, and characteristics appropriate to the most imminent housing needs of various social and economic groups, as determined by the Planning Commission. 10. Efficiency of allocation, distribution' and maintenance of common open spaces. 11. Economy and efficiency of street and public facility installation, construction, and maintenance. 12. Proof of economic capability that the developer can fully complete, on schedule, the proposed PUD or phases thereof. A-13. Developmental timetable. 14. Objectives and purposes to be served by this PUD. -22- M E M O R A N D U M TO: MR. M. KEITH WRIGHT FROM: MIRY BARBARA MAHER RE:- ZONING-WRIGHT PROPERTY -AGRICULTURAL -RURAL DATE: MAY 2111 1975 On pale 6 of the zoning ordinance, which is attached you will see that your land qualifies for development as a Planned Unit Development -Residential. Since you have the minimum of 50 acres, development would be allowed at 2 units per acre. On the top of page 7, you will see that these dwelling units can be comprised of a variety of different design structures. Please note that pages 21 and 22 would also apply in the evaluation of a subdivision for your property. As I told you on the phone, I think the close proximity of the city water lines would help to make your land attractive for residential development. Please note on page 6, section 5.302 that water and sewage must connect to city water and sewage systems. I think it would be worth the cost of running the necessary connector lines. Please call if you have any other questions or call the City Planner, Fred Mitchell,who will be glad to help you. South Burlington Planning Commission STAh�I,.RDS AND CRITERIA FOR C G SID ;RATI ONE 1. Need for Reclassification Applicants should demonstrate the need for a zone change based on one or both of the following considerations: a. the subject property is presently improperly classified. factors to be considered in determining whether an existing classification is inappropriate include. . 1. the physical nature of the land 2. the economics of its development 3. the usa7e of adjoining properties 1+. a formal analysis of the current development needs of the community 5. goals and objectives of the South Burlington Master Plan b. reclassification is needed to accomodate a use which cannot be adequately sited elsewhere in the city on land presently zoned for this purpose. 2. Sultability o.r Proposed band Use Applicants should demonstrate that the proposed land use: a. is consistent with the goals, guidelines, and directives of the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan for the development of this site, the surrounding area, and the community as a whole; b. is compatible with the location and physical capability of the site (impact on soil, topography, natural features, and scenic peauty will be considered and does not pose significant threats to resource areas marked for conservation or special protection; c. does not significantly compromise the viability of established residential neighborhoods (traffic, noise, odors, lirrhts, aesthetics are some of the considerations); 3. -S-,-ii';ability of Proposed Reclassification Applicants should demonstrate that the proposed zoning classification: a. would not have a detrimental effect on surrounding zoning districts. b. would be consistent with items 2 a, b, and c. In addition, the Planning Commission will assess the proposed zone classification for its ability to assure that all development oojectives will be met and that the public interest will be adequately protected in the event of a major chap e in aevelopment plans. If it is found that the Planning Commission favors a proposed zone change which may oe inconsistent with the Master Plan the Commission shall initiate action to revise the plan. m -2- T0: BILL SYZI•IAP KI, CITY MANAGER FROM : FRED MITCHELL, CITY PLANNER RE: PRELIMINARY SITE ANALYSIS OF KEITH WRIGHTS PROPERTY ON HINESBURG ROAD DATE: SEPTE 3ER 25, 1974 The following is a preliminary site analysis of this particular piece of property with respect to its use as a possible site for industrial development. Location The site is located on the east side of Hinesburg Road, just south of the interstate. Size and Present Land Use The site contains 130+ acres which is utilized in the operation of a dairy farm.. And is presently zoned Agricultural - Rural with the eastern side in an Airport Approach Cone. Internal Site Considerations Subsurface Conditions- The following soil associations are found on the site: SuB- Stockbridge and neillis stony loams, 3-8 percent slopes - slight limitations for development; FdC- Farmington extremely rocky loam, 5-20 percent slopes - severe limitations, shallow to bedrock; VeB- Verennes clay, 2-6 percent slopes -severe limitations, very slow permeability and wetness are considerations; VeC- Verr-ennes clay, 6-12 percent slopes, in some areas bedrock could be less than 40 "below soil surface - severe limitations, very slow permeability and wetness. Which reference to slow permeability and wetness, a review of the site a few days after a rain showed limited surface water. The owner relates that some areas of the site have drain tile. The indication of the possibility of shallow soils could 'prove a constraint to construction. It is recommended that soil boring be made to determine the general depths of soil and bedrock. r Surface Characteristics The topor-raphy shows a gentle slope going from approx- imately 4-000 in elevation near Hinesburg Road down to about 3301' at Potash Brook and rising again to over 3600 at the east side of the property. The grain of the site is in a gen- eral north -south direction. The prominete features of the landscape also includes.: an outcrop of bedrock associated with shallow soils and some trees, this area is approximately 3-5 actes in size and a part of the Farmington extremely rocky loam soil association; Potash Brook which is a perennial stream and several small unclassified intermittent streams; and a line of trees located in the north central portion of the site. No additional out cropping or boulder materials were ob- served at the site. The general existing ;round cover is composed mainly of grasses and forage growth. R`cternal Site Considerations With reference to existing land use, the surrounding areas adjacent to.the site are mostly rural -agricultural with some residential development on Hinesburg and Old Farm Roads. The interstate serves as an effective barrier to north - south movements and Hinesburg Road is the nearest coridor over the interstate. The site is adjacent, on the south west, to the already established industrial zone. Ibcterna.l Linkages Transportation- the site, has direct access on to Hinesburg Road a minor arterial, which is designed to carry traffic link- ing communities further south and in 1972 carried an average daily traffic volume of 2500 vehicles between Kennedy Drive and Old Farm Road. Old Farm Road itself carried an average daily traffic volume of 310 vehicles in 1971. The site is located approximately lg mile south of Williston Road, a prin- ciple arterial which in 1972 carried an average daily traffic volume of 8,400 vehicles. rt present there is no direct access on to the interstate system, however there have been some �-eneral ti.scissions concernin- thq�, possibility of an interchange some time in the future where Hinesburg Road crosses the interstate system. Xaaltionally, 0 0 0 0 A-2 0 )600000000000 00000 cp s. 00000 0000000 00000000 0 -Sw -----�000000(:)Ooo 000000000q�aExls OID discussion has been r-iven to the possibility of an increase in vehicles on Hinesburg road as a result of transportation planning decisions made further south for the road.. The idea of the future extension eastward of Swift Street, althou h'a lon- ranre plannins consideration, does have impli- cations for the proposed site. As presently considered the extension could possibly come directly to the site thus raising several questions concerning the nature of the road and types of vehicles carried. For some industrial location decisions the.desirability of a close proximity to air freight facilities is a determinate. This site is approximately 2 miles south of the airport. 4'lith reference to rail facilities, there are none close by and I suspect that it would be improbable for any to be established. Water- a line maintained by the Champlain water District is directly opposite the site adjacent to Hinesburg Road. Sewer- the closest municipal sewer line ends just south- east of Kennedy Drive on Hinesburg road. From this point the site is approximately 41000 away. In any consideration as to the adapability of this site for possible industrial purposes the following should be evaluated: -Ability of the site to sustain development; Density and.intensity of development; -Compatibility with existing land use relationships; -Impacts on transportation; -Ability of the city to provide sewers connections and other community facilities to this proposal as well as the already established industrial zoned land. To attempt to place these considerations in prospective, I offer the followinc, observations: A determination as to the ability of the site to sustain industrial development is a prime consid- eration. If it is found that there are extensive site limitations, discussions concerning its use for industrial purposes should go no further. In order to have an initial understanding of den- sity and intensity of development I submit the i attached Illustrative Concentual Desiun to give a better understanding as to a possible' magnitude of development that mi.-ht be contemplated. The compatibility with existing land use relationships would not be any different than those that would arise as a result of the development of the presently zoned industrial land; The possibility* of impacts on the existing transportation system would be the result of intensity of use with re- spect to employees, deliveries, shipments, additional traffic on the systems not as a result of this proposed industrial site and the ability of the roads to carry increased traffic. The intensity of development has to be established before transportation impacts are assessed. additionally, since any possible development would undoubtedly be staffed any impacts would be in the. nature of a gradual buildup to the system. To determine whether the City has the ability to provide sewer connections and other community facilities for this proposal and their establishment to the existing zoned industrial land requires an understanding as to the possi- bility of both �jrea,s beiney developed simultaneously. If this were to happen I would si.;snectthat the City would have to establish some priorities as well as the develop- ment of an enrineerins; design for sewers that would possibly accomodate both areas as well as reducing the cities share of any possible costs. The question arises as to the need for any additional in- dustrial land within the City. The area already zoned for in- dustrial pruposes, I feel, is large erough to accomodate in- dustrial growth for sometime to come. The problem arises as to the availability of this land ,for industrial development. If it is found that the City is losing the possibility of ex- randing its industrial base bacause of a reluctance on the part of owners of this land to sell or develope, than I feel that the City has several alternatives to establishing industry. The first would be to work with the owners for the encourale- ment of utilization of the already zoned industrial lands; second the City could. possibly become more actively involved in the development process itself by acquisition of land for industrial development; or third seek an alternative area that is available and is suitable for industrial development by either the owners of the land or developers. I hone that these various considerations will help to place into a presbective the specific site in question as well as the general notion of industrial development. -47 . a C %U2, rr ��+ CITY 01' SOUTH .3U LIT1 rl'C1T In He: Zone Cha.n�~e 7.ea1,).est of ??. -ht Find_.n7s of Fact On the 22nd day of Octoberr, l071- the SoijClh Bur1 _nr to:� 1 am ._ C'J?`.=J.s S;Lo:'1 the Zone c`..-'.n^'e request of 't to rezone i_�C:: acres of _1..and from the Ct?r- rert ictzltura_l-liurF. :'.�i strict to an Industrial �i: tr:i_c-- based �on tie followin facts: 1) the =.loner did not demonstrate to the Plannir_r Cc ... _cn that the proposed c-an re is ; a) e ust - s con.tribut-.nr to the nubl- c health, s afet7T, and -= neral welfare; and b) is in accord_nce with the Com-orehensive Plan. South Burlin7ton '_Dlannin feve.- 000000000000000 0 0 4 --477 )o 0000000000000000 00 70 0 .a- �_00071000 00..4- �0000000 t1w, )000000T,V,-E-xl,s i .000000000-677-887- 0 0 0000000000 0 1 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 00 (p 07e tq .4e f v I 19 ft-�. September 25, 1974 TO: South Burlington City Council Please be advised that this letter constitutes a formal request for a -;-I extelision of that currently industrial zoned. area of So. Burlington to allow inclusion of approximately 130 acres known d desi-nated as that -parcel currently owned by M. Keith Wright,�Iof So' 0 Burlington, Vt. A description of that lard to be considered ithis request is as follows: Enclosures: Survey Aerial photos Copy of"deed The intended use of the )roperty following the renuested zone change is as follows: 1. To develop industrially the land under consideration 2. To secure clients under a lease or sales situation 3. 4. To To build to clients specifications for work closely with G.B.I.C. in their industrial purposes 5. To comply with all requests made by the endeavors City of So. 13url. 6. To comply with all requests made by the State of Vt. 7. To work closely with the Ec. Dev. Dept. of Vermont I The Wright land, covers 130 + - acres and is contiguous to the land owned by R.B. Goodrich. The proposed services, sewer and water can be economically used for the two mentioned parcels should such dimensions of available acrea£;-e be needed in the future. The use of existing Route 116 which front'-s or, both parcels negates any need for extensive access roads to be constructed at tax payers expense to an industry site as is the case with the presently zones industrial area. Si,,_ce 1 M.K. 'sir ght ENC MKW/dmr 1175 WILLISTON ROAD _ vo SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 863-2891 October 23, 1974 Ms• M. Keith Wright 900 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 054-01 Mr. Wright, On October 22, 1Q74- the South Burlin-ton PlF�n- ning Commission met at a public hearin- to consider your request to chan,:e the zonin7 on your farmland from the present kr-ricultural-Rural Zoning to In- dustrial Zonin-. Your request after due consideration, was denied based upon the criteria that was established for such review. It was found that there was no demonstration as to the need for additional land for industrial purposes within the city and that your proposal to change the zone on the land did not conform to the goals and objectives established within the Comprehensive Plan. Respectfully, Free. '�-:_tchell, City Planner STATE OF VERY.- ONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY Or, SOUTH BURLINGTON In Re: Zone Chani7e Request of M. K. Wright Findings of Fact On the 22nd day of October, 1974 the South. Burlinuest' r-ton Planning Commission denied the Zone change request of 91 - M. K. Wright to rezone 1�Oi acres of land from the cur- rent Agricultural -Rural District to an Tndiistrial District, based on the following facts: 1) the petitioner did. not demonstrate to the Planning Commission that the pr. oDosed. chane is; a) justi- fied as con.tributinr"-to-the public health, safety, and (leneral welfare; and b) is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. South Burlington Planning Commission Cry of S-o z th Burlington 1175 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLiNGTON, VERMONT 05401 ''• ;- TEL.863.2891 October 23, 1974 Mr. M. Keith Wri nrht 900 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Mr. Wri-ght, On October 22, 1074 the South Burly nrton Plan- ning Commission met at a public hearinO to consider your request to cha.n-e the zonin; on your farmland from the present knricultural-Rural Zoning to In- dustrial Zonin. Your request after due consideration, was denied based upon the criteria that was established for such review. It was found that there was no demonstration as to the need for additional land for industrial purposes within the city and that your proposal to chanr-e the zone on the land did not conform to the -oals and objectives established within the Comprehensive Plan. Respectfully, Fred 1',atchell, City :Planner LAW OFFICES OF EWING & SPOKES 86 ST. PAUL STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 JOHN T, EWING RICHARD A. SPOKES July 27, 1973 Mr. william J. Szymanski City Manager 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 RE: Zone Changes Dear Bill: AREA CODE 802 863-28S7 Mrs. Maher asked me to generally review the legal aspects of zone changes. In particular, the Planning Commission desires to know how the pending zone change application concerning the Twin Oaks property,pn Kennedy Drive can be treated. A zone change is an amendment to the existing zoning ordi- nance, the effect of which is to change the boundaries of zoning districts and the permitted uses within a specific area. Rezoning, by amending the existing ordinance, can raise the question of "spot zoning". The term has been defined as "the practice whereby a single lot or area is granted privileges which are not granted or extended to other land in the vicinity in the same use district." Rathkoph, The Law of Zr)n'ncf, a d Planning, 26-1 (3d Ed.) If this is the effect Ot the zoning ch be declared invalid. ange, it can It is my opinion that zoning,change,s are premissive only if they are reasonable and in accordance with the present comprehen- sive plan. Clear support for this proposition can be found in 24 VSA 94401 which states that all by-laws shall have the purpose Of implementing the municipal development plan and shall be in accord with the policies set forth in the plan. Any zone,.change, including the fiwin Oaks property, must be in accord with the existing South Burlington master plan., Care must be taken not to consider only one specific use proposal as opposed'to all Poss uses. There also must be some justification for zoning a smalible parcel of property as opposed to a larger area. 1.0 r EWING & SPOKES Mr. William J. Szymanski Page Two July 27, 1973 The question can perhaps best be summarized as follows: "If a change of zone is reasonable and is in accordance with the comprehensive plan of the zoning ordinance and can be justified as contributing to the public health, safety and general welfare, it will not be held invalid as spot zoning even though the reclassification affects only a single piece of property or may incidentally dis- criminate in favor of the owner thereof." Rathkopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning, 26-14 (3d Ed.) I can only suggest that the City be extremely cautious in adopting any zone changed and that any zone change should fully satisfy the above test. Very truly yours, Richhrd A, Spokes RAS/n MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: FRED MITCHELL, CITY PLANNER RE: CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING ZONE CHANGE DATE: OCTOBER 18, 1974 In order for ,you to adequately evaluate any -iven pro- posal that is requesting a zone chance I offer the following for your consideration: 1) The memo dated July 27, 1973 from City Attorney Spokes should be used as a basis from which to gain an under- standing of the general concepts that you should be considering in any evaluation. 2) It is up to the applicant to demonstrate the need for such a zone change and the conformity that it will have to the tenants established in the Comprehensive Plan. 3) My memo of September 25, 1974 raises several Consider- ations with respect to general impacts that may arise from this proposal as well as the specific question regarding the need for additional industrial zoned land within the City. 4) The following are comments that are made within the Comprehensive Plan with reference to the Southeast Quadrant and Industrial Development. P.1 Industrial Areas The Shunpike Road area off Williston Road has been set aside for an Industrial Park, and will be severed in the near future. This area can be extended south ward into the Southeast Quadrant as the need arises since most of the land is under the Airport Approach Cone. A spur of the Central Vermont Railway could service this area. P.9 Land Use Through Zoning We plan to zone land for its best and highest use, taking into consideration the physical nature of the land, the economics of its development, and its re- lation to existing and current usage. We desire to set aside land and to control development in certain areas to insure capability for well planned, in- depth and orderly growth in the future. While this might entail some adjustment for the current generation, we beleive it is our obligation to protect our heri- tage for future generations. P.10 A�- .. _ricultural Lands ___._..._.. _. _ We -plan to assist, support and promote agricultural use of land wherever possible. Such land 6nce-devel- oped almost surely could not revert to agricultural unlimited determination of future growth, and all land reserved for agriculture now could provide areas for development for future generations. P.26 Southeast �idrant Planning Goals The Objective of this plan is to keep the quadrant as open as possible for as long as possible. The reasons for this position are as follows: . . (2) We wish to keep open options for agricultural use for further generations. We wish to prevent urban sprawl and unplanned growth while at the same time reserving land to be developed according to the needs of future generations. P.39 Natural Resource Base . . . (2) All swamps, wetlands, streambanks, and drainage - way should be zoned to prevent building or other intensive use. . (6) The protection and maintenance of all agricultural land should be encouraged. P.74 Sanitary Sewers When the easterly system on Williston Road is con- structed, it will serve the proposed industrial zone. . sewering the area should be given high priority to promote development in the Industrial Park. P.86 Economic Development We recommend that South Burlington work toward devel- opment of the Industrial Park off Shunpike Road. . P.93 Implementation 0 40 . (4) The Southeast Quadrant of South Burlington will be kept rural and scenic as possible by imple- mentation of the policies of restricting inten- sive growth to the growth zone, and by imple- menting the conservation and aesthetics plans. An Observation on Zone Chan, -,es: The use of spot zoning is one that, when not in accordance with the comprehensive plan, singles out and treats differently one given area, granting it privileges which are not extended to adjoining property. It may have the effect of placing certain property in a more re- strictive zone than neighboring property is classed, or conversely in a less restricted class. If such zoning change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan, that it is a furtherance of a well conceived plan to further the health, safety and welfare of the City, it will stand up as not being spot zoning. If it is not in such furtherance of the comprehensive plan, but rather is meant to aid a particular parcel of land at the expense of adjoining land, then this action would probably not be upheld by the courts. In considering a zone change affecting particular parcel(s) of land and the resulting land use the City should consider: 1) Whether the proposed change is for the good of the City; 2) The purpose of the proposed zone change; 3) Its ultimate effect. The implementation of the comprehensive can prevent spot zoning, however the use of spot zoning can negate the comprehensive plan. i PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 1974 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 1974-7:30 P.M. CITY HALL, CONFERENCE ROOM Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held b South Burlington Planning Commission on Tuesday,Y the 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall Conference Room located catb11752W, 1974 at illiston Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont on the following: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 1974 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE The official Zoning Map referred to in Section 1.10 of the Zoning Regulations, and adopted therein by reference, shall be amended so that the boundaries of the Industrial District are extended to include the following property: Commencing at the northwest corner of the so-called M. K. Wright property as shown on the South Burlington Official Zoning Map; thence proceeding in a southerly direction along Hinesburg Road, a distance of 1325 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in an easterly direction along the northern boundary of the land of Richard Painter a distance of 423 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in a southerly direction along the eastern boundary of the lands of Richard Painter, Malcom Vosburg, and Dr. L. Coffin a distance of 500 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in an easterly direction along the northern boundary of the lands owned by Green Acres Corporation a distance of 3215 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in a northerly direction along the western boundary of the lands owned by Green Acres Corporation a distance of 1290 feet, more or less, to where the lands Of M. K. Wright adjoin the right-of-way of Interstate #89; thence proceeding in a northwesterly direction along the right-of-way of Interstate #89 a distance of 1610 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in a westerly direction along the southern boundary of the lands owned by R. Tilley a distance of 2140 feet, more or less; to the Point or place of beginning. (The land and premises described above are presently located in the Agricultural - Rural District). COPIES OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE 1974 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE MAY BE EXAMINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 1175 WILLISTON ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. DATED THIS 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 1974. October 4, 1974 South Burlington Planning Commission Commencing at the northwest corner of the so—called M. K. Wright property as shown on the South Burlington official Zoning Map; thence proceeding in a southerly direction along Hinesburg Road, a distance of 1325 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in an easterly direction along the northern boundary of the land of Richard Painter a distance of 423 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in a southerly direction along the eastern boundary of the lands of Richard Painter, Malcolm Vosburg, and Dr. L. Coffin a distance of 500 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in an easterly direction along the northern boundary of the lands owned by Green Acres Corporation a distance of 3215 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in a northerly direction along the western boundary of the lands owned by Green Acres Corporation a distance of 1290 feet, more or less, to where the lands of M. K. Wright adjoin the right—of—way of Interstate #89; thence proceeding in a northwesterly direction along the right—of—way of Interstate #89 a distance of 1610 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in a westerly direction along the southern boundary of the lands owned by R. Tilley a distance of 2140 feet, more or less; to the point or place of beginning. TO: BILL SYZ1-,U.NSKI, CITY 14ANAGER FROM: FRED MITCHELL, . CITY PLANNER RE: PRELIMINARY SITE ANALYSIS OF KEITh WRIGHTS PROPERTY ON HINESBURG ROAD DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1974 The following is a preliminary site analysis of this particular piece of property with respect to its use as a Possible site for industrial development. Location The site is located on the east side of Hinesburg Road, just south of the interstate. Size and Present Land Use The site contains 130+ acres which is utilized in the operation of a dairy farm. And is presently zoned Agricultural - Rural with the eastern side in an Airport Approach Cone. Internal Site Considerations Subsurface Conditions- The following soil associations are found on the site: SUB- Stockbridge and neil.l.is stony loams, 3-8 percent slopes - slight limitations for development; I'dC- Farmington extremely rocky loam. K-20 ;percent slopes - severe limitations, shallow to bedrock; VeB- Ver`ennes clay, 2-6 percent slopes -severe limitations, very slow permeability and wetness are considerations; VeC- Vergennes clay, 6-12 percent slopes, in some areas bedrock could be less than 40 "below soil surface - severe limitations, very slow permeability and wetness. Which reference to slow permeability and wetness, a review of the site a few days after a rain showed _limited surface water. The owner relates that some areas of the site have drain tile. The indication of the possibility of shallow soils could Drove a constraint to construction. It is recommended that soil boring be made to determine the general depths of soil and bedrock. No Text Surface Characteristics The toQor-raphy shows a Sentle slope going from approx- imately 4.00 in elevation rear Hinesburt- Road down to about 3301 at Potash Brook and rising af-ain to over 3600 at the east side of the property. The,Qrain of the site is in a gen- eral north -south direction. The prominete features of the landscape also includes: an outcr6p of bedrock associated with shallow soils and some trees, this area is approximately 3-5 ag4es in size and a part of the Farmington extremely rocky loam soil association; Potash Brook which is a perennial stream and several small unclassified intermittent streams; and a line of trees located in the north central portion of the site. No additional out cropping or boulder materials were ob- served at the site. The general existing ground cover is composed mainly of grasses and forage growth. E, ternalSite Considerations With reference to existing land use, the surrounding areas adjacent to the site are mostly rural -agricultural with some residential development'on Hinesburg and Old Farm Roads. The interstate serves as an effective barrier to north - south movements and Hinesburg Road is the nearest coridor over the interstate. The site is adjacent, on the south west, to the already established industrial zone. maternal Linkq es Transportation- the site, has direct access on to Hinesburg Road a minor arterial, which is designed to carry traffic link- ing communities further south and in 1972 carried an avera-e daily traffic volume of 2500 vehicles between Kennedy Drive and Old Farm Road. Old Farm Road itself carried an average daily traffic volume of 310 vehicles in 1971. The site is located approximately 14 mile south of Williston Road, a prin- ciple arterial which in 1972 carried an average daily traffic volume of $1400 vehicles. At present there is no direct access on to the interstate system, however there have been some LPngral fi_sc-.ssions concerning the Possibility -of an interchange some time :r� the future where Hinesburg Road crosses the interstate systems aaitfonally, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0000000000000000000000 2 "e,74f;7 m discussion has been given to the possibility of an increase in vehicles on Hinesburg Road as a result of trans-portation planning decisions made further south for the road. The idea of the future extension eastward of Swift Street, althouh'a lons range planning consideration, does have impli- cations for the proposed site. As presently considered the extension could possibly come directly to the site thus raising several questions concerning the nature of the road and types of vehicles carried. For some industrial location decisions the.desirability of a close proximity to air freight facilities is a determinate. This site is approximately 2 miles south of the airport. With reference to rail facilities, there are none close by and I suspect that it would be improbable for any to be established. Water- a line maintained by the Champlain Water District is directly opposite the site adjacent to Hinesburg Road. Sewer- the closest municipal sewer line ends just south- east of Kennedy Drive on Hinesburg Road. From this point the site is approximately 4,6001 away. In any consideration as to the adapability of this site for possible industrial purposes the following should be evaluated: -Ability of the site to sustain development; -Density and intensity of development; -Compatibility with existing land use relationships; -Impacts on transportation; -Ability of the city to provide sewers connections and other community facilities to this proposal as well as the already established industrial zoned land. To attempt to place these considerations in prospective, I offer the following observations: A determination as to the ability of the site to sustain industrial development is a prime consid- eration. If it is found that there are extensive site limitations, discussions concerning its use for industrial purposes should go no further. In order to have an initial understanding of den- sity and intensity of development I submit the attached Illustrative Conceptual ]design to c-i.ve a better understanding as to a possible, magnitude of development that r�� �.t, be contemplated. The compatibility with existing land use relationships would not be any different than those that would arise as a result of the development of the presently zoned industrial land; The possibility,of impacts on the existing; transportation system would be the result of intensity of use with re- ,spect to employees, deliveries, shipments, additional traffic on the systems not as a result of this pror;osed industrial site and the ability of the roads to carry increased traffic. The intensity of development has to be established before transportation impacts are assessed. -Additionally, since any possible development would undoubtedly be staged any impacts would be in the. nature of a Uradual buildup to the system. To determine whether the City has the ability to provide sewer connections and other community facilities for this proposal and their establishment to the existing zoned industrial `sand requires en understandinn as to the possi- bility of both areas being developed sinultaneously. If' this were to happen I would suspect that the City would have to establish some priorities as well as the develop- ment of an engineering design for sewers that would possibly accomodate both areas as well as reducing the cities share of any possible costs. . The question arises as to the need for any additional in- dustrial land within the City. The area already zoned for in- dustrial pruposes, I feel, is larce enough to accomoda to in- dustrial -rowth for sometime to come. The problem arises as to the availability of this land for industrial development. If it is found that the City is losing the possibility of ex- panding its industrial base bacause of a reluctance on the part of owners of this land to sell or develope, than I feel that the City has several alternatives to establishing industry. The first would be to work with the owners for the encouraue- ment of utilization of the already zoned. industrial lands; second the City could. possibly become more actively involved in the development process itself by acquisition of land for industrial development; or third seek an alternative area that is available and is suitable for industrial development by either the owners of the land or developers. I hope that these various considerations will help to place into a prespective the specific site in question as well as the eneral notion of industrial development. i �^"'" f� „v s 'e'#'`s?vim ,J w,y ,y-s'� t;!? 4:j� 1..� �' • �..r �, s ,yC`, �; /� �,} 4i-�� � � ..> �•._;� � »..sue ���.:.i �.�t .. .. _ � ..x `_.,.. � ` � � � ' ���� �'� _ A� f { t j :: `..._ _ � _-x ; _._. J.ac..�.,.. o..�..� � _ ...�-w �.s_��.... .�..+.r....+�•r.�.wao yw_. ,.,.-.w..s�.-a�.a.:.v,x..s i_ t I PUBLIC HEARING -- SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION PROi�OSED AMENDMENT . TO 1974 . SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONINGORDINA14CE TUESDAY, APRI L 30,1974 7:30 P.M. CITY HALLCONFERENCE ROOM Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held by the South Burlington Planning Commission on Tuesday, April 30, 1974, at 7:30 p.m. at f the City Hall Conference Room located at 1175 Williston Road In the City of South Burlington, on the following: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 1974 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE The official Zoning Map referred to In Section 1.10 of the zoning regulations, and adopted therein by reference, shall be amended so that the boundaries of the Residential-4 District are extended to include the following property: "Commencing at the southeast corner of the so-called Rice High School property as shown on the South Burlington official Zoning Map; thence proceeding in a northerly direction along the Rice High School and Burlington Country Club easterly i boundaries a distance of 536 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in an I leasterly direction along the Burlington Country Club and j University of Vermont southern boundaries a distance of 575 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in a southerly direction along the western boundary of the University of Vermont property a distance of 695 feet, more or less; thence proceeding In a westerly direction along the southern boundary of the Vermont State Highway Department land for a distance of 690 feet, more or less; thence turning in a northerly direction along the easterly boundary of Vermont Broadcasting Inc. for a distance of 260 feet, more or less, to the point or place of beginning." (The land and premises described above are presently located in the Business Planned Development District). COPIES OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE 1974 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE MAY BE EXAMINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 1175 WILLISTON ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON. Dated this 12th day of April, 1974. SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION April 13, 1974 PUBLIC HEAR11:1-����� SOUTHBURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL PROPOSE D AMENDMENT TO 1974 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE MONDAY, JUNE 17,1974 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL CON FERENCERoom Notice is hereby given of a public' hearing to be held by the South Burlington City Council on Monday, ' June 17, 1974, at 7:30 p.m. at the City' Hall Conference Room located at 1175 Williston Road in the City of South Burlington, on the following: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 1974 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONINGORDINANCE The official Zoning Map referred to in Section 1.10 of the zoning regulations, and adopted therein by reference, shall be amended so that the boundaries of the Residential-4 District are extended to include the', following property: "Commencing at the southeast corner of the so-called Rice High ` School property as shown on the South Burlington official Zoning Map; thence proceeding in a northerly direction along the Rice High School and Burlington Country Club easterly boundaries a distance of 536 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in an easterly direction along the Burlington Country Club and University of Vermont southern boundaries a distance of 575 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in a southerly direction along the western 1 boundary of the University of Vermont property a distance of 695 feet, more or less; thence proceeding , in a westerly direction along the southern boundary of the Vermont State Highway Department land fora distance of 690 feet, more or less; thence turning in a northerly direction along the easterly boundary off Vermont Broadcasting Inc. for a , distance of 260 feet, more or less, to the poinf or place of beginning. (The land and premises described above are presently located in the Business Planned Development District). COPIES OF THE PROPOSED } AMENDMENT TO THE 1974 SOUTH I �BURLINGTON ZONING ORDI- NANCE MAY BE EXAMINED AT! THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 1175 WILLISTON ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, Dated this 20th day Of May, 1974. SOUTH BURLINGTON CITYCOUNCIL . May 28, 1974 . �.-tom _ .,,�y� ��4 �• N - �� - -ram - _ _-.�,�_-__ �• ..now .•moo+- � � ' "r! a Vol.,; ')1 Page 358 FORM A-1 VEIINI0\T • WARRANTY DEED uj Ow Jffit �Y We, M. KEITH WRIGHT and JEAN A. WRIGHT, McAULIFFF PAPER CO., ING of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State 'of Vermont Grantors ,in the consideration of ----------------------------TEN AND MORE ---------------------- Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by M. K. WRIG_HT, INC., a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Vermont, having its principal place of business in "f South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont Grantee , by these presents, do freely 0ibe, rant, < Q��, Coat ey atib Confirm unto the said Grantee M. K. WRIGHT, INC., and its kcricx, successors or assigns forever a certain piece of land in South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follolvs, viz: A farm of land with all buildings thereon containing 208 acres, more or less, and being more particularly described as follows: PARCEL ONE: A parcel of land situated on the westerly side of State Highway No. 116, having a frontage thereon and uniform width of 70 feet and a uniform depth of 280 feet, and being all and the same land and premises conveyed to M. Keith Wright by warranty deed of Donald A. and Agnes J. Leach, dated May 6, 1965, and recorded in Volume 73 at Page 281 of the Town of South Burlington Land Records. PARCEL TWO: A farm of land with buildings thereon, being all and the same land and premises decreed to M. Keith Wright from •the , Estate of Mae J. Wright by Decree of Distribution dated April 21, 1959, and recorded in Volume 48 at Pagp 129 of the Town of South Burlington Land Records, and by Decree from the Estate of Merton J. Wright by Decree of Distribution dated April 21, 1959, and recorded in Volume 48 at Page 130 of the Town of South Burlington Land Records excepting therefrom: a. A rectangular parcel of land 430 feet by 85'feet, n H I N X I conveyed to Donald A. and Agnes J. Leach by warranty deed of M. Keith Wright dated May 6, 1965, and recorded in Volume 73 at Page 282 of the Town of South Burlington Land Records. b. A parcel of land containing 10.1 acres, more or less, condemned by the State of Vermont for highway purposes as further des- cribed in a condemnation order fixing compensation dated May 10, 1961, and recorded in Volume 48 at Pages 489-499 of the Tom of South Burling- ton Land Records. The above -described premises are subject to and have the benefit of all rights of way of record, and including an easement and right of way granted to the Green Mountain Power Corporation May 1, 1961, and record- ed in Volume 63 at Page 15 of the Town of South Burlington Land Records, PARCEL TWO above is subject to a mortgage to the Federal Land Bank of Springfield, dated March 2, 1956, as recorded in Volume 40 at Pages 177-178 of the Town of South Burlington Land Records, securing an indebtedness which the Grantee herein expressly assumes and agrees to pay. Jean A. Wright joins in this conveyance to release her interest in the homestead which forms a portion of the property herein conveyed. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned deeds, easement, and condemnation record, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description,. 0 0 bate atib to bulb said granted premises, with all the privileges and ap- purtenances thereof, to the said Grantee M. K. WRIGHT, INC., its hf_:�M successors or assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; And we the said Grantors M. K.EITH WRIGHT and JEAN A. WRIGHT, for. OURSELVES and our heirs executors, 'administrators, successors or assigns, do covenant with the said Grantee M. K.,WRIGHT, INC., its >110 ', successors, or assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents we are the sole owner s of the premises, and have good r-ivht and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are Cla'�'���S��bir'ca�, except as'aforesaid, Vol o 91 Page '359 f} ' F j i i P II i } 7-, Od 0 ol 0 0 0 0 -:)O00000c)oc)ooc)c)(-) P, ko I City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 8, 1993 Mr. Michael Kirick Hallam Associates 99 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Appeal Dear Mr. Kirick: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, November 22, 1993 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your zoning application. Please plan to attend and be prepared to address the criteria enclosed. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative officer 1 Encl RW/mcp The overall visual impact of the new unit is expected to be negligible. Please refer to the enclosed existing photos and proposed reproductions/drawings for comparison. Please note that the existing building does have some exhaust and plumbing vents which stick up above the roof line. The new chiller unit will not be taller than these existing constructions. If you have any questions in regards to this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at Hallam Associates or David Giffin (Project Engineer) at NET in White River Junction, VT, 295-8190 ( or page at 295-2480). We are both intending to be at the Zoning Board meeting to answer any questions you have at that time. Sincerely, ,/ &� Michael P. Kirick, P.E. Project Manager /t ,- f uJ lap /,) U z;!Ir-r No Text V T H Q i 25 /s-06 -•�.r.-�-.s.�..+.-- --c _=am �.�—. =ate _:..:.—: _: _-` "4 7 1 I 1 tj 1 I o I 11 D I Gi G� j G 1 I �' O V 119% OC- � D r r9 ( Fll?0116-1 N/ GF, v Ay - ---� - - -own � r-- 4 r )I Y -®r 1� ,i i 11 - ( ­-__ tI T1 1 F- JH �I__r__ ;� �wiu� �Ia _ i . ,1 - I 1 L 1 i �. 4 ) ;' ♦f C '1 �I --._'k 4k yi •r -,jI 11 �I TI 41 it w. I • 90'�I,�� ' '_- _ n7 v / � ///7Lx/? x / /~� 7/ ��/u/) 6, /' NE c:-.C14TIrjlA Vi=m-r PROPOSED VIEW FROM I-89 LOOKING SOUTHEAST E.XISTINk VEN'r 4 EY hAUsT STACKS NFw ROOF ToP CF(ILLER. PROPOSED VIEW FROM HINESBURG ROAD LOOKING NORTHEAST EXISTING VIEW FROM I-89 LOOKING SOUTHEAST EXISTING VIEW FROM HINESBURG ROAD LOOKING NORTHEAST SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zon- ing Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burling- ton Zoning Board of Ad- justment will hold a public hearing at the South Bur- lington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Bur- lington, Vermont on Mon- day, November 22, 1993 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following: #1 Appeal of New En- gland Telephone, Michael Klrick agent seeking a va- riance from Section 18.112 Height of struc- tures of the South Bur- lington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to install a continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES 1 150 ton roof -top air condi- tioner at a height of thirty eight (38) feet, located at New England Telephone, 800 Hinesburg Road. #2 Appeal of Green Mountain Development Group, Inc. seeking app- proval from Section 10.20 Conditional uses subsec- tion 10.203 Nursing and Convalescent Homes of the South Burlington Zon- ing Regulations. Request is for permission to con- struct a 90,240 square foot (155 bedrooms) nurs- ing/convalescent home in conjunction with approxi- mately 71,000 square feet of general and medical office use on a lot con- taining 11.6 acres located at 421 Dorset Street. Plans are on file with the South Burlington Planning and Zoning of- fice, located at City Hall, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Offi,;er November 6, 1993 / HALLAM ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS November 1, 1993 South Burlington Zoning Board South Burlington, VT RE: Air Conditioning System Upgrade, Rooftop Unit South Burlington, VT Dear Zoning Board: David M. Hallam, P.E. William A. Fyfe, P.E. John R. Butterfield, P.E. 99 Swift Street, Suite 300 South Burlington, VT05403 802-658-4891 Fax: 802-658-1457 This is a brief letter of clarification explaining the request for a conditional use at this building site and who the contact people should be in the event any questions need answered or additional information is required for your process. New England Telephone (NET) is anticipating the construction of an air conditioning system upgrade for their South Burlington office site on Hinesburg Road. Hallam Associates (HA) has produced a set of design plans and specifications for this project in coordination with NET. As a result of design requirements for this building, the upgraded system will consist of one 150 ton roof top chiller unit, which will replace two 60 ton condenser type roof top units. The new unit will be situated in approximately the same location as the existing units, however, due to the physical size difference of the larger single unit, the top of it will extend above the roof line by about 30 - 36 inches. It will have a basically box shape construction and will be field painted to match the bronze color of the existing roof trim metal. The original building plans indicate that the building was to be constructed 34'-10" tall, in conformance with the 35'-0" building height limit of South Burlington. No height measurements have been taken to determine the actual current height of the building. The request for conditional use is for allowance of this new replacement roof top unit, although it might slightly exceed the 35' height restriction. The installation of this unit is to correct for deficiencies in the existing system, which presently can not keep up with the building's cooling demand in the warmer months. No additional occupancy renovations to the facility are planned under this project and the number of employees at this site is not expected to increase at this time. The upgrade is strictly for the increased comfort of this existing occupants of the facility. Official Use City of South Burlington Application to Board of Adjustment Date 1111113 Applicant NfVV Owner, leasee, agent Address S©pA HINES$w" Rr>. Landowner APPLICATION # HEARING DATE FILING DATE FEE AMOUNT Telephone # ZIT- 81Q 0 &4curtr EN6wrlA. DAAVE_ Address Location and description of property C)Met 90+tD01G a,y i►irJE8u2G, k�. k))I. . AF- 6irr+N6, A Nett Aix (9,ub1To,*AJ, A)A UNIT 0" 'e00F. Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer( X )request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question Reason for appeal The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and any other additional information which will serve as support evidence to the Board. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line ------------------------------------------------------------------ SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on %%17rvt Day of Week %�y3 at f ° to consider the followinct: State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation January 5, 1998 Burlington Properties Limited Partnership P.O. Box 3180 Farmington Hills MI 48018 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-5656 Subject: WW-4-0141 -- Install sewage force main into Lot 44 (4C0473-5) from Rt. 116 for future development. located on elff.Koute 116 in South Burlington, Vermont Dear Applicant: In reviewing our records, we find that we have not approved the above referenced application as being in compliance with the Environmental Protection Rules. The last activity noted in the file is a letter to you requesting additional information. Since we have not received the requested information we are denying your application because the information submitted is not sufficient to make a determination that the proposed project can be developed in accord with the riles. If you wish to pursue the project, you will need to submit a new application form, fee and complete engineering plans. The project will need to meet the minimum requirements of the Environmental Protection Rules in effect at the time the application is submitted. Sincerely, essanne Wyman Assistant Regional Engineer c City of South Burlington Planning Connnission Richard Trudell Act 250 Coordinator M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: April 11, 1989 agenda items Date April 7, 1989 1) RUSSELL SUPPLY, GREGORY DRIVE 1. Curb opening shall have a concrete depressed curb. 2. It appears that some of the plantings are on top of the water main and drainage lines. They should be at least. 10 feet away. 2) BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LIMITED, HINESBURG ROAD 1. A private road 2,000 feet long should not be allowed. It also splits lot 3 into two parcels. 2. The planned east -west road should continue easterly along the southerly property line at least to lot number 4 and terminate with a turnaround. The road is planned to go south of the exist- ing quarry and into Williston approximately 1500 feet south of I-89. 3. Using the center of a swale as a property line is difficult to establish in the future. 4. Road base shall have 18 inches of gravel base and 3 inches of bituminous concrete surface. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 April 7, 1989 Mr. Richard Trudell Trudell Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Burlington Properties Limited Partnership Dear Mr. Trudell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next. Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also en- closed are Bill Szymanski's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 11, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner Encls cc: Chris Eckman JW/mcp CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record Burlington Properties Limited Partnership 29199 Orchard Lake Road P.O. Box 3180 Farmington Hills, Michigan 48018, (313) 553-4300 b. Applicant Same as above c. Contact person Richard P. Trudell, Trudell Consulting Engineers, In. P.O.Box 308 lliston. Vermont 05495 879-6331 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). Subdivision of 80 acres parcel into 4 lots for industrial use. 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) fee simple 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties See attached list 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Various utility easements, access easements, ROW for Swift St. Extension, airport approach cone, conservation zone along swale. 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. Extension of water main 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub- division, and include the dates of such actions: Site plan approval Mitel - parcel of land west of proposed Swift St Extension cannot be considered a separate lot (May 5, 1981) Semicon subdivision of 31 acres from 111 acre parcel (Sept 22, 1986) Site plan approval - Orchard Lake Road Properties (Aug. 25, 1987) 8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. (Signature) applicant or contact person date ADJOINING OWNERS K. & M. Wright 900 Hinesburg Road Box 2096 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 L. & S. Wiles 42 Longmeadow Drive Shelburne, Vermont 05482 R. & A. Painter 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Green Acres c/o Ralph Goodrich P.O. Box 2123 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 L. & R. Coffin 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Landrum 178 Harbor Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 LAND OWNERS ACROSS HINESBURG ROAD Ed Hill 875 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Vernon Hurd 1035 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Mrs. Gwendolyn Rye 1075 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 LAW OFFICES THOMAS F. HEILMANN F& ASSOCIATES, INC. THE GIDEON KING HOUSE 35 KING STREET P. O. BOX AG BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0216 THOMAS F. HEILMANN CHRISTOPFIER D. EKMAN JANICE A. FORGAYS ROBERT V. SIMPSON. JR. MARY J. SIGLER' ADMITTED IN OK AND MO ONLY Joseph Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 March 6, 1989 TELEPHONE (802) 864-4555 FAX a (802) 864-4659 RE: Burlington Properties Limited Partnership Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Weith: Enclosed herein for filing please find the Subdivision Application - Sketch Plan in connection with the above -referenced matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Christopher D. Ekman CDE:lkm Enc. tfh.ppp.80 THOMAS P. HEILMANN CHRISTOPHER D. EKMAN ]ANICE A. IOKCAYS ROBERT V, SIMPSON. IR. MARY I. SIG[,ER• ADMnreD IN OK AND MO ONi v LAW OFFICES THOMAS F. HEILMANN & ASSOCIATES, INC. THE GIDEON KING HOUSE 35 KING STREET P. O. BOX 2IG BURLINGTON. VLRMONI 05402-0216 March 6, 1989 TH-EPI]ONE (802) 864-4555 FAX u (802) 864-4659 Mr. Lou Borie MAR - 8 199 District Environment Commission #4 111 West Street MANAGER'S OFFICE Essex Jct. , VT 05452 'ITY OF SO. BURLINGTOP Re: Application of Burlington Properties Limited Partnership Dear Mr. Borie: Attached is an application for an amendment to Land Use Permit No. 4C0473-5, to allow the Permittee to subdivide its 80 acre parcel of land into four parcels. The amendment, we believe, does not involve "substantial" changes to the Permit. We believe that the proposed amendment involves "material changes" that do not present a significant adverse impact under any of the 10 criteria of 10 V.S.A. s6086(a). We, therefore, respectfully request that the application be subject to the simplified review procedures outlined in Environmental Board Rule 34(c). Enclosed please find the following: (1) The Application for Land Use Permit Amendment; (2) The Certification with an attached list of adjoining owners; (3) The Notice pursuant to 10 V.S.A. s6084; (4) The Project Summary, and; (5) A check made payable to the District Environmental Commission #4 in the amount of $540.00. We have sent copies of this application to the City of South Burlington, the South Burlington Planning Commission and the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission. Would you please schedule a hearing at the earliest possible time in the event a party requests a hearing on this application. Thank you. Very truly yours, - TFH:lkm Thomas F.�eilmann Enc. cc: City of South Burlington South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Board of Selectmen Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission APPLICATION FOR LAND USE PERMIT h„cNDMENT ENSTRUCTIONS: -Use this form for minor Land Use Permit amendments, including permit transfers. Applications for permit transfers are to be completed by the transferree. SECTION Appli Laws Fee: 1 - FOR OFFICE USE ONLY cation No.: Involved: Filing Date: Deemed Completed By: SECTION II - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT 9 rc ar Lake Rd. , P.O. Box 3180 Burlington Properties 1. APPLICANT: T ;m; 1.ed Partn_r_ship Farmington Hills, MI 48108 313-553-4300 (Name) (Address) (Phone No.) 2. PROPERTY OWNER: Same (Name) (Address) (Phone No.) 3. PERSON TO BE CONTACTED ABOUT THIS APPLICATION (Complete only if different than 01) Thomas F. Iieilmann, Fscbuire P.O. Box 216, Burlington, VT 864-4555 (Name) (Address) (Phone No.) 4. WHAT IS YOUR LEGAL INTEREST IN THIS PROPERTY? Fee Simple, Volume 219 , Page 1 .-168 5. IF YOU ARE NOT FILING THIS APPLICATION AS AN INDIVIDUAL, COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Partnership Michigan (Legal Entity) (Date Formed) (State) (Date registered in VT) 6. WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THIS REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE PERMIT: Permission to subdivide permitee' s 80 acre parcel of land into four parcels. ee attached project suTery. `Inis application involves amendments to Land Use Permit No. 4C0473-5. 7. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES IN THE FOLLOWING ITEMS FROM INFORMATION IN THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION a. Acreage in the entire tract of land 80 acres b. Acreage in this project 80 acres C. Date the project will be started upon approva]_ d. Date the project will be completed Lyon a nr_oval C. Funding or bonding of this project Not �1j2p1]Cablc __ — f. Municipal services to be used None g. Estimated construction cost $200, 000. 00 SECTION III - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED ON PERMIT TRANSFERS 8. TRANSFERREE: I hereby agree to complete this project as set forth in the application, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the Land Use Permit # , and as amended above: (Transferree) 9. TRANSFERROR: I hereby agree to the transfer of Land Use Permit 4 as set forth above: (Trans ferror) SECTION IV - NOTICE TO PARTIES - TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPLICANTS FOR ACT 250 PROJECTS 10. This application must be signed by the applicant and landowner. By -signing this application, the applicant assumes responsibility for the information provided and, when the amendment involves Act 250, confirms that the town selectmen, planning commission, and regional planning commission were given a copy of the application as required. (signature of applicant) date signature of landowner)ate i DATE : March , 1989 In accordance with Title 10 11S11, §60P,4, I certify that I have delivered complete sets of this application and all plans and attachments to the municipality (Selectmen, Aldermen, Trustees), the municipal planning commission, the Chittenden County Regional planning Commission, and any adjacent municipality and municipal planning commission adjoining this project. FEE: 540. 00 LIST OF ADJOINI M LA1InnvmFPC MD ADDRESSES: Sce Attachment A LOCATIOM HAP: See Attachment B COMMENCEMENT OF cnNSTRUCTION NOTICE: N/A. BURLINGTON PROPEERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP f By: .g ire Applicant or MessengerS/ Peter Pollak , ATTACHMENT A � 1 � � ADJOINING OWNERS K. & M. Wright 900 Hinesburg Road Box 2096 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 1 L. & S. Wiles 42 Longmeadow Drive Shelburne, Vermont 05482 R. & A. Painter 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Green Acres c/o Ralph Goodrich P.O. Box 2123 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 L. & R. Coffin 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Landrum 178 harbor Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 LAND OWNERS ACROSS IIINESBURG ROAD Ed hill 875 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Vernon Hurd 1035 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Mrs. Gwendolyn Rye 1075 Hinesburg 'Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 c 4i U 4 H Q ',PROJECT LOCATION In accordance with Rule 10 of the Environmental Board the following parties have an interest in the involved land: City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Landrum 178 Ilarbor Road Shelburne, VT 05482 (holder of right-of-way dedication for Swift St. Extension) (holder of access easement across property to 31.2 acre parcel) N 0 T I C E CONZENCLdCNT Or CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES A PERMIT pursuant to Title 1.0 VSA Section 6081 (Act 250) "Commencement of construction" is defined by Act 250 as "the construction of the first improvement on the land or to any structure or facility located on the land in- cluding work preparatory to construction such as clear-' ing, the staking out or use of a right-of-way or in any way incidental to altering the land according to a plan or intention to improve or to divide land by sale, lease or otherwise transfer an interest in the land." (Envi- ronmental Board Rule 2(C) A violation of any provision of the rules is punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for each day of the violation or imprisonment for not more than two years, or both. (T. 10 VSA, Section 6003) . I understand there is to be no site work or construction commenced on this project until a written Land Use Per- mit is issued. I further understand that verbal indica- tion that a IKind Use Permit may be issued does not consti- tute authorization to commence construction. IURLIGT-ON PRORERT�IRS LIMITED PiAi (TNE :SII By. 11pp cant's Signature Peter Pollak March 1989 Date TIIIS NOTICE MUST BE E)CECUTED AND RETURNED WITH YOUR LAND USE APPLICATION. PROJECT SUMMARY This Application requests that the District Environmental Commission #4 amend Land Use Permit No. 4C0473-5 to allow the Permittee to subdivide its 80 acre parcel of land on the Hinesburg Road in South Burlington into four parcels. The 80 acres would be subdivided into parcels measuring 11.83 acres (Lot 2), 15.56 acres (Lot 1), 22.6 acres (Lot 3) and 27.6 acres (Lot 4). (The remaining 2.42 acres comprises a road.) A copy of the Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. subdivision plat plan dated December 14, 1988 and entitled "Orchard Lake Road Properties" depicting the proposed subdivisions is attached to the Application. The 11.83 acre parcel (Lot 2) would be retained by the Permittee. The Permittee has no plans for the 15.56 acre parcel (Lot 1) or the 22.6 acre parcel (Lot 3) at this time. In the event, however, either parcel becomes the object of a prospective buyer's interest, then the Permittee will agree to give all permits and findings of fact to the prospective buyer. The 27.6 acre parcel (Lot 4), which comprises the easterly portion of the 80 acre parcel, is under a contract of sale to the United States Postal Service. The United States Postal Service has agreed to purchase the 27.6 acre parcel from the Permittee subject to the Permitee's obtaining this subdivision approval. The United States Postal Service was fully aware of the Department of Environmental Conservation's Findings of Fact in all respects, the Permits and the particular circumstances involving this property before it executed the contract to purchase the 27.6 acre parcel. The Postal Service was aware prior to signing the contract that before it can develop the 27.6 acre parcel, District Environmental Commission #4 development approval must be obtained. The Permittee understands that the United States Postal Service wishes to construct a 116,000 square foot mail distribution center and a 16,000 square foot vehicle maintenance facility. The Permittee also understands that the Postal Service wishes to construct a 3,500 square foot storage building and provide 16,600 square feet of parking. The contract between the Permittee and the Postal Service requires that the Permittee provide a road and utility services to the 27.6 acre parcel. Specifically, the Permittee is to build a road, install an 8 inch sanitary sewer line, 8 inch water line and 4 inch telephone conduit, and excavate for electric service. The locations of the road and services are depicted on the enclosed plan. The road is intended to be private. It is not necessarily going to be a public road that the City of South Burlington will accept. The Permittee is prepared to erect "No Trespassing" signs to designate the private character of the road. Because the Postal Service's needs will dictate, the Permittee is unsure when construction of these improvements would begin if this application is granted. The Permittee does not request a change in the conditions of the current Land Use Permit applicable to the parcel of land. The Permittee's sole request is for permission to subdivide the parcel and to make the improvements as described above. It is recognized by both the Permittee and the United States Postal Service that the four parcels will continue to be subject to the conditions of the current Land Use Permit. Development of the site is underway in compliance with the current Land Use Permit. With the exception of the improvements outlined, the only change in the project will be in the ownership of the 27.6 acre parcel of land. It is the Applicant's position that the simple act of subdividing the 80 acre parcel into four parcels of land, and the construction of the road and installation of utilities will not result in any significant impact to the site under the 10 criteria of Act 250. Any future changes in land use on any of the four parcels of land to be created by this approved subdivision will be subject to a full review by the City of South Burlington and the District Environmental Commission under Act 250. The following is a summary of the impact of the proposed Amendment on the 10 criteria: Criteria 1. 2 and 3: The development is served by South Burlington Water Department and Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facility. The subdivision of land will not result in the expansion of the facilities, increase in process emissions, increase'in use of water or wastewater flows. Future expansion or new development on either parcel of land will be subject to full review and evaluation by the District Environmental Commission. Criterion 4: With the exception of the road and utilities, the subdivision of land will not result in the construction of improvements or the disturbance of earth. Erosion control measures will be taken to minimize erosion during construction of the road and installation of the utilities. These measures are detailed on sheet D2 of the attached Plan. Future expansion or new development on either parcel of land will be subject to full review and evaluation by the District Environmental Commission. Criteria 5. 6 and 7: The subdivision of land will not result in increased traffic, students, or other demands on municipal services. Future expansion or new development on either parcel of land will be subject to full review and evaluation by the District Environmental Commission. Criterion 8: The subdivision of land will not result in any change in the appearance of the existing buildings and will not result in an impact on wetlands, historical values, or wildlife habitat. The construction of the road represents a minimal intrusion. Future expansion or new development on either parcel of land will be subject to full review and evaluation by the District Environmental Commission. Criterion 9A: The subdivision of land will not result in an increase in population in the town and region. Future expansion or new development on either parcel of land will be subject to full review and evaluation by the District Environmental Commission. Criteria 9B and C: With the exception of the road and utilities, the subdivision of land will not result in construction of improvements on the agricultural soils and will not significantly reduce the agricultural potential of the primary agricultural soils on the site. The roadway will cover approximately 84,000 square feet, approximately two acres. The conditions of the previously issued land use permits will continue to apply to the project site. Future expansion or new development on the site which may affect primary agricultural soils will be subject to full review and evaluation by the District Environmental Commission. Criteria 9D. E and F: Not applicable. Criterion 9G: The site is served by utilities which are either municipally or publicly owned. Criterion 9H: The project site is contiguous to existing settlements. Not applicable. Criterion 9J: The project is served and will continued to be served by municipal and public utilities. The subdivision will not result in an increase in demands on these utilities. Future expansion or new development on the site will be subject to full review and evaluation by the District Environmental Commission. Criterion 9K: Not applicable. Criterion 10: Subdivision approval is being sought from the City of South Burlington. --mmoftm jaw j, $0 I I .l_ • s mmomp to rr 00 j OP. op to +� Alternative Roadwav Comparison Square feet No. of Curb Cuts of Option Hinesburg Road Spear St. Ext. Pavement Sketch A 2 6 236,260 Sketch B 2 6 225,160 Sketch C 2 1� 232,300 00 N' B " r**O�� w ,, 0 A U X W kA •. F 1 j MEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE B) 4 9rrf Jy O'i'f R.f! M. WRIGNT - rw tl VN. /77 342 w• 3 7s'N'le'! 2 LANDRUM . [• e!> YK 24 N• S/I �fp3 `1 -- - ezq 3� •f ` v. � lri sq II \\\\ t >y IO ww0I+O1ED SEWEw` 1) \ � EiSEYEMT .vy �pe•f _ _ _--- LN �IO ELECTRICAL EASEMENT r \ \\ � 10' SEr[w e r 10 rdtER A SFRFR • � II MWERT LIMO \ J SAS • WATER EASEMENT y \ ID'oi[wJ L b ^ \ EASEMENT I ( EASEMENT GLSEMENT O I S[REII ICavTERLINE OF SRALE) "E - LOT I 3 e>•Oe'.y- f f 1 I %YOK �eA,s , 17.76 A. J�-- Jzs; / / P pSEO 60' ICCEJS R 1 I �I - SMOR STORAGL ANp ELECTRICAL // E-EMEwi---- Y'N _ "--. j RMx/3 I 1 � LOT 4 _ 27.6 Ac ASERER • _ 333.32' -- -�I EASEMENT _ w eJ•os'Ae'E /. .oe A! •NEti LOT 2 mNSFRrtrlow zoN[ M /F� L•�`�f,3 11.63 Ac. '� THE (I --- m' EAcx sIDE of CENTER Of THE - u u w eJ•O!' •pT.1 L07 3 11 SNALE 22.6 AC_ 11 Ao.00' N e1• oe' Ae' E eQey 11 I R LBS WILES �� 11� tl tl Vel 71 N. 128 AMIIpFIWTE WESTERN EDGE W R.A A. PAINTER RESTRICTED wIMrAT AfIRDACM AREA. I V.I. 73 pp. 331 LOT I A.\ nwERn IN[ ! C R. I LLrTERLRIE p SRALE) A A- PAINTER •y smo-ATER EIlErENTS �� I 6' TDESTRIAN L.6 S. WILES sy -� ±----� I I I E ASEWNT YAL 11/ PS• 63 -_- NeJ•OI'S9'E _-___- --_ ___-_._�-____ I I Ne!•pl sf•F-.______-5�- i___�___�_��NIJ•OI'!9 e--L------- v. />e f SIp -- b>ff' 10321' Ittl.tl' 1122. lO' I r slol bs'F L.5 R. COFFIN V.I. 77 DS. 123 GREEN ACRES Ve/. S1 ►g. 26 LEGEND • CONCRETE MONUMENT EXISTING O CONCRETE MONUMENT TO RE SET CAuplic SCAW �- - SWALE • CALCULATED POINTS ON LINE AS PER POSTAL SERVICE PLAT or DONALD L HAMLIN feet MAT IS" 200 O SOO A00 e00 M, N N4veEs O I)D AM IJO 200 2N i 16 CHAR. meows ­At'y iw by 03048 ZONlh fuewlNet 6As[D u°o1I rwu[ NORTH Ij1' NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE sr4ra^ 1•TE. O . Nsrr�PRN X.8 M. WRIGHT Pw 1D VDI. lIS p9. 312 �, a Is•Ii Ie'E LANDRUM e [ • JYe �.T3. �— VK2/8 M• 5)4 O - \�YP �--�d�e b•F ti 3E1IER [AdlY[Mf �ATgN I ( E6REMENT e•S f W• 2 I N D!•ll'OI•E 1 f` O1 'I TI I epp h0' -- �10 - - -_- v I.a \\ \\ SO' RATER • SENER O I) MOPERTI LINE ELECTRICAL EASEMENT JO GAS •WATER EASEMENT iC \ t0'WATEw- EASEYf.T M' SENER L EASEMENT 1 Ir L� EASEMENT O L (f2MT[RLINE OE. -It) t0 ^ \\ J 1 I Z 1 60' SENER LOT I 13.36 AIL DT°O6'.,I•f / / 3YS 1 1r IS +100' R1DNTd / 1_ Pwov09ED 60 ACCE93 a 111 EASEMENT I FOTURE) J� p0 _ _SLOP[ / UTEWEAFT 1 1 I Y. IT6 PSIO SO' EASEMENT F011 DAIIIE. / -T--.. A. 1 II I - 3YON STORAGE ANDY>'UTILITY\ I W.I!O' 91DPF I I E ��__ ( ���� d� ELECTRICAL // EASEMLNT� LOT 4 0. ! 11 EASEMEM _ a _ -�-+-L r WNSEARYITION ZONE Aoess / [.`•h COT 2 • I I '_ __ M, EACH SIDE OF TM c J� h 1/.83 IC. LOT 3 I 1 CENTER OF THE SHALE 3 Ne3•06 --f I R L.85 WILES R, 1 �p O VAL 74 p0. 128 \ APPRO+IYATE MSTFRM EDGE OF R.8 A PAINTER M111I1TED RUN NAI APPROACH AREA V.I. 73 p9. 351 a• ,,p¢i s. eeC W t RT IRE 1 LOT I � (L2N—LME a INALFI • C oY Jp`1 R.8 A. PAINTER L-8 S. WILES 1 \ ID' STORrwATER ��� [AD[YEMTS >> I 1 1 �.T i I'!- PEDESTRIAN Sti -� 'I EASE.— rl)e PS/O VDI. 141 p I. 83 - - - - - --_ -+-----� weJ•Oi 39•E _.----___�.-_ I--__------_N as. OI'l91, L_-------- e0798' I0321' Ittl.11' IIYY.90' I N e!•ol'S9•c L. 6 R. COFFIN - Nr V.I. 57 p9. 123 C"*k SLAIt !ea [00 0 too AGO 800 SPD NR[9wd M D SO 100 IW too tS0 To DDeYn Nw9[IS m*10Y fM by 03048 GREEN ACRES V.I. 91 00. 26 LEGEND • CONCRETE MONUMENT EXISTING O CONCRETE MONUMENT TO 8E SET SWALE • CALCULATED POINTS ON LINE AS PER POSTAL SERVICE PLAT 8r DONALD L. HAMLIN MAY 1988 GREEN ACRES V.I. 96 N. 129 ZONING DISTRICT • INDUSTRIAL. AGRICULTURAL TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. u S- P RDAO Sm 106 NN+ - � 05.% (602, 87R-o Mw `V 1 VOtTY AMI nls oEsclgion Dm O. [ewKbrO tiE OF V E�4 f ro. r 4� SLIA Burlington Properties Limited Partnership South Burlington, Vermont y— Oft SUBDIVISION PLAT ►•Oleo M-* plgen rRA°IA8a Dane I2-14-88 ------- Relli RPT DINMO SUat-J/,P�/%• _ DPI •IOC AMNO�LIY idulCf.�lYf LEGALS 1 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 1974 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE TU ESDAY, OCTOB ER 22,1974 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL, CONFERENCE ROOM Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held by the South Commissio.n on Tuesday, Octoberngton l22 1974 at 7 30 p.m. at the om located at11175aWil�stonll rRoad ence Rothe City of South Burlington, Vermont on the following: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 1974 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONINGORDINANCE The official Zoning Map referred to in Section 1.10 of the Zoning Regulations, and adopted therein by reference, shall be amended so that the bundaries of the Industrial District are extended to include the following property: Commencing at the northwest corner of the so-called M. K. Wright property as shown on the South Burlington official Zoning Map; thence proceeding in a southerly direction along Hinesburg Road, a distance of 1,325 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in an easterly direction along the northern boundary of the land of Richard Painter a distance of 423 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in a southerly direction along the eastern boundary of the lands of Richard Painter, Malcom Vosburg, and Dr. L. Coffin a distance of 500 feet, more or less; thence proceeding In an easterly direction along the northern boundary of the lands owned by Green Acres Corporation a distance of 3,215 feet, more or less; thence proceeding in a northerly direction along the western boundary of the lands owned by Green Acres Corporation a distance of 1,290 feet, more or less, to where the lands of M. K. Wright adjoin the right-of- way of Interstate No. 89; thence proceeding in a northwesterly direction Y Of Interstate allo. g89ta distance ofa1,610 feet, more or less; thence proceeding In a irection along the southern boundr lyary of the lands owned by R. Tilley a distance of 2,140 feet, more or less; to the point or place of beginning. (The land and premises described'above are presently located in the Agricultural -Rural District). THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE 9774 SOUTH BURLINANCENMAY O BE EXAMINED N ZONING ORDI- NANCE THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 1175 WILLISTON ROAD, SOUTH BURLI NGTON, VT. DATED THIS 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER 1974. Oct. 4. 1974 291. A , o_ Q South Burlington Planninq COrlmlS., O n •P 1 V A July 18, 2016 Jeffrey P. Kershner Donald L. Hamlin Consulting Engineers 136 Pearl Street Essex Jct., VT 05453-0009 Re: Lighting Fixture Approval — 800 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Kershner: This is in response to your letter of July 15, 2016 in which you provided details of new light pole fixtures to be installed at 800 Hinesburg Road. The new lighting levels will not exceed the 3.0 foot- candle average limit as evidenced by the point by point lighting plan provided. In addition, the lighting fixtures will comply with the Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations which provide examples of acceptable and unacceptable lighting fixtures. These lighting upgrades are not considered a change to the site plan so no further approvals or zoning permits are required. You may proceed to install the new fixtures without further review. Sincerely, AyvmondJ. Bel lr Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Please reply to: ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS P.O. Box 9 136 Pearl Street Essex Junction Essex Junction, Vermont Vermont 05453 July 15, 2016 Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 800 Hinesburg Road - Lighting Improvements South Burlington, VT Dear Mr. Belair: Tel. (802) 878-3956 Fax (802) 878-2679 www.dlhce.com As we recently discussed, Pizzagalli Properties is proposing lighting improvements at 800 Hinesburg Road consisting of the removal of the existing light fixtures from the existing poles and replacement with LED light fixtures to be installed on the existing poles. No new light poles are proposed as part of this work, although several of the existing poles will now have two light fixtures mounted back-to-back. The existing fixtures are mounted above the top of the existing poles. The new fixtures will be mounted at the top of the existing poles (not above them), so the fixture mounting heights will be less than the existing fixtures. Enclosed is a Proposed Lighting Plan depicting a numerical grid of the proposed illumination levels throughout the site. This plan includes a table of lighting statistics indicating an average of 1.30 footcandles in the parking, drive, and sidewalk areas. There is little to no light spillover outside of the property, with the exception of the access drive intersection with Hinesburg Road, as there is an existing light fixture located at this intersection to provide illumination of the pedestrian crossing. A light fixture schedule is depicted on this plan describing the proposed light fixtures. Also enclosed are catalog cuts for the proposed light fixtures. On behalf of Pizzagalli Properties, we request written approval from your office to proceed with the implementation the proposed lighting improvements. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or if you need additional information. Respectfully, Jef*eershner, P.E. Vice President Enc. Cc: Michael Tomkowicz WATER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION SUBDIVISIONS LABORATORY ANALYSIS WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT SKI LIFTS (WATER AND WASTE WATER) STREETS AND HIGHWAYS RECREATION AND INDUSTRIAL PLANNING LAND SURVEYING AIRPORTS SOIL BORINGS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Engineering— "The link between what we have and what we need' LED AREA LIGHTS - AEROMAXTM SMALL (XASU) US patent 7828456, 7952293, 8002428 and CAN 2693131 & 2701653 and US & Int'I. patents pending DOE LIGHTING FACTS Department of Energy has verified representative product test data and results in accordance with its Lighting Facts Program. Visit www.lightingfacts.com for specific catalog strings. LIGHT OUTPUT - XASU # of LEDS Lumens (Nominal) Type 3 Type FT Type 5 Watts (Nominal) SS o = SS 64 7000 6200 6100 69 3 64 8500 1 7650 7500 89 B SS 64 6700 1 5700 5600 69 3 H0 , 64 7900 1 6700 6700 89 LED Chips are frequently updated therefore values may increase. This product, or selected versions of this product, meet the standards listed below. Please consult factory for your specific requirements. ARRA t!JW RHS C� Funding Compliant mmnN< (lNM MA wet location C E ® IP65 Fixtures comply with ANSI C136.31-2010 American National Standard for Roadway Lighting Equipment - Luminaire Vibration 313 requirements. SMARTTECM - LSI drivers feature integral sensor which reduces drive current, when ambient temperatures exceed rated temperature. ENERGY SAVING CONTROL OPTIONS — DIM — 0-10 volt dimming enabled with controls by others. BLS — Bi-level switching responds to a 120-277V signal from separate controller or sensor (by others), with low light level decreased to 30% maximum drive current. OCCUPANCY SENSOR (IMS) - Optional internal passive infrared motion sensor activates switching of luminaire light levels. High level light is activated and increased to full bright in 1-2 seconds upon detection of motion. Low light level (30% maximum drive current) is activated when target zone is absent of motion activity for — 2 minutes and ramps down (10-15 sec.) to low level to allow eyes time to adjust. Sensor is located on the front of optical assembly. Sensor optic has a detection cone of approximately 45'. Examples of detection - occurs 30' out from a 30' mounting height pole; occurs 20' out from a 20' mounting height pole. EXPECTED LIFE - Minimum 60,000 hours to 100,000 hours depending upon the ambient temperature of the installation location. See LSI web site for specific guidance. LEDS - Select high -brightness LEDs in Cool White (5000K) or Neutral White (4000K) color temperature. 70 CRI. DISTRIBUTION/PERFORMANCE - Types 3, FT and 5. Exceptional uniformity creates bright environment at lower light levels. Improved backlight cutoff minimizes light trespass. HOUSING - One-piece, die -formed aluminum. Weather -tight housing contains factory prewired driver and field connections. Extruded one-piece EPDM gasketed wiring access door (with safety lanyard) is located underneath and utilizes tool -less thumbscrew fastener. Fixture is IP65 rated. OPTICAL UNIT - Clear tempered optical grade flat glass lens sealed to aluminum optics housing creates a sealed optical unit (includes pressure -stabilizing breather). Optical unit is recessed into housing cavity and sealed to the housing with extruded one-piece EPDM gasket. Optical unit lanyard serves dual purposes of safety and provides positive ground between unit and housing. MOUNTING - Tapered rear design allows fixtures to be mounted in a quad pattern without the need for extension arms. Use with 3" reduced drilling pattern on round and square poles. A round pole plate (X4RPP, X5RPP) is required for mounting to round poles. Wall mount available by ordering wall mounting bracket (BKS-XBO-WM-*-CLR). See Accessory Ordering Information chart for all brackets. ELECTRICAL - A terminal block for attachment of incoming primary wiring is supplied. Two - stage surge protection (including separate surge protection built into electronic driver) meets IEEE C62.41.2-2002, Location Category C. Available with universal voltage power supply 120-277VAC (50/60Hz input), and 347-480 VAC. Optional twistlock photocell receptacle is available. Photocell must be ordered separately. DRIVER - Available in SS (Super Saver) and HO (High Output) drive currents (Drive currents are factory programmed). Components are fully encased in potting material for moisture resistance. Driver complies with IEC and FCC standards. Driver and key electronic components can easily be accessed. OPERATING TEMPERATURE - -40°C to +50'C (-40°F to +1227). FINISH - Fixtures are finished with LSI's DuraGrip° polyester powder coat finishing process. The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling. WARRANTY - LSI LED fixtures carry a limited 5-year warranty. PHOTOMETRICS - Please visit our web site at www.isi-industries.com for detailed photometric data. SHIPPING WEIGHT (in carton) - 31 lbs. / 14.1 Kg LISTING - ETL listed to U.S. and International safety standards. Suitable for wet locations. For a list of the specific products in this series that are DLC listed, please consult the LED Lighting section of our website or the Design Lights website at www.designlights.org. Project Name Catalog # Fixture Type 04/29/16 © 2016 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. LED AREA LIGHTS - AEROMAXTM SMALL (XASU) LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION TYPICAL ORDER EXAMPLE: XASU FT LED 64 HO CW UE WHT PCR Prefix Distribution Light # of Drive Color Input Voltage Finish Optional Controls Optional Sm1rr-e I Fnc Nrrpnt Tpmnprpt XASU 3 - Type III LED 64 SS - Super Saver CW - Cool White UE - Universal BLK - Black Wireless Control Systems' Sensor 5 - Type V HO -High Ouput (5000K) Voltage BRZ - Bronze ((blank) - None IMS - Integral Motion FT - Forward NW - Neutral White (120-277) GPT - Graphite PCM - Platinum Control System Sensors Throw (4000K) MSV- Metallic Silver PCMH- Host/SatellitePlatinum 347-480 - Universal PLP - Platinum Plus Control System options Voltage (347-48OV) SVG - Satin Verde Green GCM -Gold Control System PCR - Photoelectric WHT - White GCMH- Host/SatelliteGold Control Receptacles Control System DIM - 0-10 volt dimming (required for satellite fixtures) Stand -Alone Control (blank) - None DIM - 0-10 volt dimming3 (from external signal) BLS - Bi-level Switching° (from external signal - required 120-277V controls system voltage) LUMINAIRE EPA CHART - XASU Single 0.9 EH• D180° 20 D90° 1.6 T90° 2.7 TN120° 2.8 090° 3.1 Note: House Side Shield adds to fixture EPA. Consult Factory, ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION' (Accessories are field installed) Description Order Number Description Order Number BKA X_80-EC_6-CLR. 6". Extension Arm _ 382136CLR FK120 Single Fusing_(120Vi..__-__- _ — F_K_120y BKS XBO WM_` CLR Wall Mounting Bracket ___ --- 382132CLR FK277 Single-Fusini(P771 FK2771 XASU HSS_House Side Shield (Black only) 5441038LKI _--__ _ DFK208,240_Double Fusing2( 08V 24.O.V1 - DFK208,2409 X4RPP Round Pole Plate for 4 Poles _ 379967CLR DFK480 Double Fusin 1480Vj DFK4801 X5RPP Round Pole Plate for 5° Poles __-- --__ 379968CLR _ FK347 Single Fusing (347V) - _ _ FK3479 PC120 Photocell for use with PCR option (I201_ 1225141 .-- _ PMOS120 120V Pole -Mount OccUp?-KySensor 518030CLR1I PC208-277 Photocell for use with PCR option (208V 240V, 277V)1225158_ PMOS208/240 208V. 240V Pole -Mount Occupancy Sensor 534239CLR1I _PC347 Photocell for use with_PCR option (347V) 1595161 _ PMOS277 277V Pole -Mount Occupancy Sensor . _ 518029CLR1I PC480 Photocell for use with PCR option (48OV) 12251801 PMOS480 480V Pole -Mount Occupancy Sensor 534240CLR10 FOOTNOTES: 1- For wireless controls information and accessories, see Controls section. 2- Requires a SiteManager and override switch. Not compatible with BLS or IMS option. 3- Not compatible with IMS or BLS option. 4- Not compatible with wireless controls system, DIM or IMS option. 5- Not compatible with wireless controls system, DIM or BLS option. DIMENSIONS 6-3/8" (161 min) 18-3/8" (466 mm) Front View 7.7/8" . ' ._------. r9nn mml 6- Photocell must be ordered separately. See Accessories. 7- House Side Shields add to fixture EPA. Consult factory. 8- Factory installed PCR option required. See Options. 9- Fusing must be located in the hand hole of pole. 10- To be used in conjunction with any of the PCM/GCM wireless controls systems in fixture. Consult factory. 26.1/2" (674 mm) 18-3/8" Side View (466 mm) Bottom View Project Name Catalog # Fixture Type 04/29/16 © 2016 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. LED AREA LIGHTS - AEROMAXTM MEDIUM (XAMU) __ _ US patent 7828456, 7952293, 8002428 and CAN 2693131 & 2701653 and US & Int'I. patents pending DOE LIGHTING FACTS Department of Energy has verified representative product test data and results in accordance with its Lighting Facts Program. Visit www.lightingfacts.com for specific catalog strings. LIGHT OUTPUT - XAMU # of LEDs Lumens (Nominal) Type 3 Type FT I Type 5 Watts (Nominal) — = SS o� 128 13500 14100 12100 139 �3 HO 128 16500 17300 14800 176 _Em SS 128 12400 13200 11200 139 3 HO 128 15000 15800 12500 176 LED Chips are frequently updated therefore values may increase. SMARTTECTM - LSI drivers feature integral sensor which reduces drive current, when ambient temperatures exceed rated temperature. ENERGY SAVING CONTROL OPTIONS — DIM — 0-10 volt dimming enabled with controls by others. BLS — Bi-level switching responds a 120-277V signal from separate controller or sensor (by others). Low light level decreased to 30% maximum drive current. OCCUPANCY SENSOR (IMS) - Optional internal passive infrared motion sensor activates switching of luminaire light levels. High level light activated and increased to full bright in 1-2 seconds upon detection of motion. Low light level (30% maximum drive current) activated when target zone is absent of motion activity for — 2 minutes and ramps down (10-15 sec.) to low level. Sensor located on the front of optical assembly. Sensor optic has a detection cone of approximately 45'. Examples of detection - occurs 30' out from a 30' mounting height pole. EXPECTED LIFE - Minimum 60,000 hours to 100,000 hours depending upon the ambient temperature of the installation location. See LSI web site for specific guidance. LEDS - Select high -brightness LEDs in Cool White (5000K) or Neutral White (4000K) color temperature. 70 CRI. DISTRIBUTION/PERFORMANCE - Types 3, FT and 5. Exceptional uniformity creates bright environment at lower light levels. Improved backlight cutoff minimizes light trespass. HOUSING - One-piece, die -formed aluminum, weather -tight housing contains factory prewired driver and field connections. Extruded one-piece EPDM gasketed wiring access door (with safety lanyard) located underneath and utilizes tool -less thumbscrew fastener. Fixture is IP65 rated. OPTICAL UNIT - Clear tempered flat glass lens sealed to aluminum optics housing creates a sealed optical unit (includes pressure -stabilizing breather). Optical unit is recessed into housing cavity and sealed to the housing with extruded one-piece EPDM gasket. Optical unit lanyard serves dual purposes of safety and provides positive ground between unit and housing. MOUNTING - Tapered rear design allows fixtures to be mounted in a quad pattern without the need for extension arms. Use with 3" reduced drilling pattern on round and square poles. A round pole plate (X4RPP, X5RPP) is required for mounting to round poles. Wall mount available by ordering wall mounting bracket (BKS-XBO-WM-'-CLR). See Accessory Ordering Information chart for all brackets. ELECTRICAL - A terminal block for attachment of incoming primary wiring is supplied. Two - stage surge protection (including separate surge protection built into electronic driver) meets IEEE C62.41.2-2002, Location Category C. Available with universal voltage power supply 120-277VAC (50/60Hz input), and 347-480 VAC. Optional twistlock photocell receptacle is available. Photocell must be ordered separately. DRIVER - Available in SS (Super Saver) and HO (High Output) drive currents (Drive currents are factory programmed). Components are fully encased in potting material for moisture resistance. Driver complies with IEC and FCC standards. Driver and key electronic components can easily be accessed. This product, or selected versions of this product, meet the standards OPERATING TEMPERATURE - -40°C to +50°C (-40°F to +122°F). listed below. Please consult factory for your specific requirements. FINISH - Fixtures are finished with LSI's DuraGrip® polyester powder coat finishing process. ARRA Q"` RHS loc ation ation The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling. °°°'°"c°°""ia°` "oca C,Or,P„AST WARRANTY - LSI LED fixtures carry a limited 5-year warranty. IP65 PHOTOMETRICS - Please visit our web site at www.Isi-industries.com for detailed C E ® photometric data. Fixtures comply with ANSI C136.31-2010AmencanNational Standard for Roadway Lighting SHIPPING WEIGHT (in carton) -39lbs./17.7Kg Equipment - Luminaire Vibration 3G requirements. LISTING - ETL listed to U.S. and International safety standards. Suitable for wet locations. For a list of the specific products in this series that are DLC listed, please consult the LED Lighting section of our website or the Design Lights website at www.designlights.org. Project Name Catalog # Fixture Type 04/29/16 © 2016 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. LED AREA LIGHTS - AEROMAXTM MEDIUM (XAMU) LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION TYPICAL ORDER EXAMPLE XAMU FT LED 128 HO CW UE WHT PCR Prefix Distribution Light # of Drive Color Input Voltage Finish Optional Controls Optional Sensor/Options Source LEDs Current Temperature XAMU 3 - Type III LED 128 SS - Super Saver CW - Cool White UE - Universal BILK - Black Wireless Control System' 2 Sensor 5 - Type V HO -High Ouput (5000K) Voltage BRZ - Bronze ((blank) - None IMS - Integral Motion FT - Forward NW - Neutral White (120-277) GPT - Graphite PCM - Platinum Control System Sensors Throw (4000K) MSV - Metallic Silver PCMH - Host/Satellite Platinum 347-480 - Universal PLP - Platinum Plus Control System Options Voltage SVG - Satin Verde GCM - Gold Control System PCR - Photoelectric (347-480V) Green GCMH- Host/SatelliteGold ControlReceptacle6 WHT - White Control System DIM - 0-10 volt dimming (required for satellite fixtures) Stand -Alone Control (blank) - None DIM - 0-10 volt dimming3 (from external signal) BLS - Bi-level Switching^ (from external signal - required 120-277V controls system voltage) LUMINAIRE EPA CHART - XAMU Single 1.4 f -m D180° 2.8 �i D90° 2.4 T90- 4.0 Ww, TN120° 4.0 090° 4.7 Note: House Side Shield adds to fixture EPA. Consult Factory. ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION' (Accessories are field installed) Description Order Number Description Order Number -CLR Wall Mounting Bracket __ 382132CLR X4RPP_Round Pole Plate for 4 Poles _ 379967CLR X5RPP Round Pole Plate for 5" Poles 379968CLR PC120 Photocell for use with _PCRon (120VI 1225148____ PC208_ 277 Photocell for use with PCR option_L08V, 240V 277VL 1225151 PC347 Photocell for use with PCR option (347V) — 15951611 - - - ---- PC480 Photocell for use with PCR option (480V) 12251808 FOOTNOTES: 1- For wireless controls information and accessories, see Controls section. 2- Requires a SiteManager and override switch. Not compatible with BLS or IMS option. 3- Not compatible with IMS or BLS option. 4- Not compatible with wireless controls system, DIM or IMS option. 5- Not compatible with wireless controls system. DIM or BLS option. DIMENSIONS (shown with PCM/GCM controls) DFK208, 240 Double Fusing (208V 240V _ _—DFK208,2409 _- PMOS208/240 208V, 240V Pole -Mount Ocupanc cy Sensor534239CLR"" PMOS277 277V Pole -Mount Occupancy Sensor 518029CLR' PMOS480 480V Pole -Mount Occupancy Sensor 534240CLR 6- Photocell must be ordered separately. See Accessories. 7- House Side Shields add to fixture EPA. Consult factory. 8- Factory installed PCR option required. See Options. 9- Fusing must be located in the hand hole of pole. 10- To be used in conjunction with any of the PCM/GCM wireless controls systems in fixture. Consult factory. 6.34, (161 mm) - 35-7/16" d -- 1-9/16" (900 min) (39 mm) Front View XAMU HSS - House Side Shield i 5" (127 mm) -_ f 12-3/4" (324 mm) Side View 18-5 (465 Bottom View Project Name Catalog # Fixture Type 04/29/16 © 2016 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC T R A N S M I T T A L 462 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05401 To Mr. Ray Belair From Bob Bouchard Address Administrative Officer Date/Time 3-14-2016 City of South Burlington Subject 800 Hinesburg Road Renovations 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Enclosed Quantity Code 1 Executed Zoning Permit Application to relocate an electrical transformer M 1 Reduced Site Plan 1 Application fee Check # 166102 for $58.00 1 Application for Certificate of Occupancy for 800 Hinesburg Road Renovations M 1 Letter from contractor regarding delaying installation of plantings until Spring Remarks Hi Ray. Please contact me with any questions. Thank you, Bob Codes: A K LETTER FOLLOWS L FOR FIELD CHECK M FOR YOUR USE N SEE REMARKS FOR INITIAL APPROVAL F QUOTATION REQUESTED B FOR FINAL APPROVAL G APPROVED C APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION REQUIRED H FOR APPROVAL D APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION NOT REQUIRED I AS REQUESTED OR REQUIRED E DISAPPROVED - RESUBMIT J FOR USE IN ERECTION PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC T R A N S M I T T A L 462 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05401 To Mr. Ray Belair From Bob Bouchard Address Administrative Officer Date/Time 3-18-2016 City of South Burlington Subject 800 Hinesburg Road 575 Dorset Street South Burlin ton, VT 05403 Certificate of Occupancy Fee Enclosed Quantity — Code 1 Request for Certificate of Occupancy fee for 800 Hinesburg Road Check # 166169 for $153.00 — M Remarks Codes: A FOR INITIAL APPROVAL F QUOTATION REQUESTED K LETTER FOLLOWS B FOR FINAL APPROVAL G APPROVED L FOR FIELD CHECK C APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION REQUIRED H FOR APPROVAL M FOR YOUR USE D APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION NOT REQUIRED I AS REQUESTED OR REQUIRED N SEE REMARKS E DISAPPROVED - RESUBMIT J FOR USE IN ERECTION February 22, 2016 Re: #SP-16-13 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Flay and J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com W11901, IN, south ,- PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- 1/ (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑p Administrative ❑Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 462 Shelburne Road, Suite 101 Burlington, VT 05401 T:802-660-6805 F:802-660-6868 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): Book 1248 Pg. 158 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 462 Shelburne Road, Suite 101, Burlington, VT 05401 T:802-660-6805 F:802-660-6868 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Bob Bouchard - Development Manager Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 462 Shelburne Road, Suite 101, Burlington, VT 05401 T:802-660-6805 F:802-660-6868 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: bbouchard@pizzagalliproperties.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 800 Hinesburg Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0860-00800.1- 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Relocate electrical transformer on north side of building from previously approved location. Site plan enclosed. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 800 Hinesburg Road is a two story, 65,800 square foot general office building, situated on 17.32 acres with 274 parking spaces. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): No changes are proposed. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Existing building is 65,800 gross square feet. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): West wing is 35' high. East wing is 48' high. Two floors. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Fairpoint has roughly 100 employees. iSystems, Inc. has roughly 100 employees. 200 total. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 E NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line Robert Bouchard PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewe this site plan application and find it to be: Llicomp The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 l HYD. RATER N.V. OEm DEscRlpnaN�o UP 0.6' POINT v BEpNNING I 8 ID ' •!' .M" LICE LA"`. P CGNCRETE 2� Pao O O O O o O z`• ° O �O 6 o O O //z-C�0 PA 1.f AREA TRENCH AIN- C O o O I ®0 o 0 o 0 o i ae'Ka 0 / G 0 o • 00 0 0 o ' 0 o i 4 PAa. AREA try O o �O 0 o 1 o 0 ry 0 ry• 0 0 / 0 0 O O 0 0 ^ O O MOTLRCYC PA D PARKING PARKIN ///---EXISRNG CONIfER HEDGE ROW O � AREA / 45 INOINDUAL TREES 0 O (D p 0 RETAINING l Q0 sHm __-- -POLE IS 1.0' OILER ROE LINE 0 Tax Map No. OB80-0OB96 `_~�"•"""••"�� Mt^iAl ASSOCIATES N. 675 P. 550 EXISTING CONIFER HEDGE ROW — map slide 150 1. LNDINDUAL }FEES NOITS: I) THIS PLAT 6 BASED ON DEEDS RESEARCHED IN THE CM OF SOUTH WRUNGTON LAND RECORDS AND A CLOSED FIELD TRAVERSE CONDUCTED WITH A TOTAL STATION ON 7/28/0 , BEARINGS ARE BASED ON MAGNETIC NORTH, 2) WEARS SET ARE NO. S REINFORCING BARS WITH ALUMINUM CAPS STAMPED 'TRUCELL CONSUMING ENGMEERS. LS 4BB". CONCRETE MONUMENTS FOUND ARE FOUR INCHES SQUARE. REBARS FOUND ARE NO. S REINFORCING BARSWITHYELLOW PLASTIC CAPS STAMAED'VSE LS527'. 3) THIS LAND WAS CONVEYED TO WRT- SOUTH BURUNGTON PROPERTY LLD IN VOLUME 1233 PAGE25A AND SHOWN ON APLATENTITLED "HELEN M. TILLEY PARCEL OF LAND TO BE CONVEYED TO PIZZAGALU DEVELOPMENT CO:'. WHICH IS RECORDED IN MAP SLIDE 170. THE BUILDINGS. EQUIPMENT AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS, FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES WERE CONVEYED TO WRT - SOUTH WRLINGTON PROPERTY LLC IN VOLUME 738 PAGE 126. 4) DISTANCES ARE SHO WNTOTHE HUNDREDTHOF A FOOT AND BEARINGS ARE SHOWN MONE SECOND FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. COURSES AND DISTANCES MAY VARYFROM DEEDED COURSES AND DISTANCES WE TO DIFFERENCES IN INSTRUMENTATION. DECUNATK)N ANDMETI W OF MEASUREMENTS. 5) AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO IDENTIFY OR DELINEATE EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY. LEASE LANDS. ENCROACHMENTS, ETC. OBSERVED IN THE FIELD OR READILY FOUND IN THE LAND RECORDS. ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES, RECORDED OR UNRECORDED. MAY EXI r—N ARE NOT SHOWNON THIS PLAT. 6) UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES AND PLANS OF RECORD. ACTUAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND LANES MAY MW. 7) THE PROPERN DESCRIBED ON THIS SURVEY DOES NOT LIEWIN N A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA SFHA) AS DEFINED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY: AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS IDENTIFIED AS COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 50007CO258D AND SCO(I7CO259D. BEARING AN EFFECTIVE DAIS OF DULY IB. 20H, 8) THERE ARE 269 REGULAR PARKING SPACES. 5 RESERVED PARKING SPACES. A HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES AND A CONCRETE PAD FOR MOTORCYCLE PARKNG. 91 WILD FOR INTERSTATE 89ANO HINESBIRG ROAD (ROUTE 116) WAS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF VERMONTIN A DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 48 PAGE489 Co QCb GE 0 -70' EASEMENT TO GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER. P. 211 P. 7. \\\\ PROPOSE. 0 \ CEDAR SCREEN NO `\ •. \ PAD MOUNTED \\ TRANSFORMER \ CEDAR EO CEDAR EDAR �.` SCREEN 41 PRDPOSED SIDEWALKS LEGEND REBAR ( FOI/NO, SEE NOTE 2 ) CONCRETE MONUMWT ( FOUND. SEE NOTE 2 ) a0 LICHT POLE t7 CALCULATED PCNT 4 URLITY POLE ___________ P __________ OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES —x—x—x—x--1E- BARBED WE FENCE —0-0-0— WOVEN NiRE FENCE D __ STORM ORAN 5 .__________ SANITARY SEWER .------- UP ----------- UNDERGROUND POWER -------- OP OP .________- OVERHEAD POWER -------- W ---------- WATER LINE --------- G-------- --- NATURAL GAS LME T .____... ___ OVERHEAD TELEPHONE --------- UT ----------- UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE I� HYD. HYDRANT VALVE 011ll WATER lry/R4 yy CB DRAINAGE CATCH BASIN HCP HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE 1P CO R RESERVED PARKING SPACE > N D. BOLLARD = NAYLOP 8 EXISTING BUSH O 4BE EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE ,n�NS� EXISTING CONIFER HEDGE ROW "'dlllll111111111111 �n•ww•/ ryyP� s� Cry ry� S �6S T,9 4- \ f 89 1-1 `PROPOSED \ SCREEN DUMPSTER DATE EXISTING BUILDING p0 �"�20' SEWER EASEMENT 1. 20] P. 176 v. 207 P. 180 v. 211 IF, 86 MOM Tax Mop No. ONO-OOB00 77.31 ACRES i T.. Map No. 0860-01000 LANDRUM v. 218 p. 514 reap slide 208 Graphic Scole E� RIRIRIR� -= Feet 60 0 60 120 180 240 TYPICAL GALVANIZED FENCE WITH GATE ADD #1 1012115 LOCATION II I/T ElPAr610WCONIRAc1pN KJMIMM ASPHa1T WFAEGNnrto 1XEAvoncD iltfR ENERrsD IEET. y 5CUWD0RTG0V JOOEM(I'DEPX I/JiNETDTAIDE* OlwlNY lASEPARA 11611111 AI W LL-BREaAOR COARLFx JOMEv[RYAHDE. 41 WHERE'IEAWDMCONCRDESEC60m6CALIFoote11111 1TAIH THE80EWA116IOSE8 IHKK CollxE IAms vSR 6" ARIE 6" IAT n«xO,DFDMDABDNIOPROEE`�A nOBD11 HINEADNT1.o,DDm. ® MOVE PROPOSED TRANSFORMER 211011E 50I Site Plan ® ADD SIDEWALK h GATE DETAILS 10/02/15 SOT Drawing pumper 20141 ]]-41 Ed. ® ADO SNOW STORAGE h TREES O6/22/15 WI WRT— SOUTH BURLINGTON ® UPDATE SURVEY -ADD TREES 05IN175 BOP PROPERTY LLC Propel mgr. SDI Drown SOT m ® UPDATE SURVEY UPDATE SURVEY 12108114 SOT 8112114 SOT 800 Hinesburg Road ® A. BEE GARY DESCRIPTION, L, South Burlington, Vermont Date - 9/Tt/14 Scale 1"�60' m BUILDING HEIGHTS ADD CERTFlCATINN 1/17/O6 .01 12/06/05 SOT Field Book Disk 226 B6 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS qK ROAD VRLLXTpl, VFRHONT os•vs oz I ww. Revillon9 Deaviplian Dola By PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC T R A N S M I T T A L 462 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05401 To Mr. Ray Belair From Bob Bouchard Address Administrative Officer Date/Time 2-11-2016 City of South Burlington Subject Site Plan Review 575 Dorset Street 800 Hinesburg Road South Burlin ton, VT 05403 FnrJcicerf Quantity Code 1 Executed Application for Site Plan Review (Administrative) M 3 Full size site plans M 1 Reduced site plan M 1 Application Fee Check # 165905 for $223.00 M Remarks Hi Ray. As discussed, attached please find a site plan application to detail the relocation of the electrical transformer and vault that was previously approved for the 800 Hinesburg Road renovation project. Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Bob Codes: A FOR INITIAL APPROVAL F QUOTATION REQUESTED K LETTER FOLLOWS B FOR FINAL APPROVAL G APPROVED L FOR FIELD CHECK C APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION REQUIRED H FOR APPROVAL M FOR YOUR USE D APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION NOT REQUIRED I AS REQUESTED OR REQUIRED N SEE REMARKS E DISAPPROVED - RESUBMIT J FOR USE IN ERECTION June 26, 2015 Re: #SP-15-39 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Since" , Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com „f • b � ZONINGPLANNING & Permit Number SP-�-� (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW EDAdministrative El Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 462 Shelburne Road, Suite 101, Burlington, VT 05401 T: 802-660-6805 F:802-660-6868 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): Book 1248 Pg 158 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 462 Shelburne Road, Suite 101, Burlington, VT 05401 T:802-660-6805 F:802-660-6868 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Bob Bouchard - Development Manager Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, 462 Shelburne Road, Suite 101, Burlington, VT 05401 T: 802-660-6805 F:802-660-6868 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: bbouchard@pizzagalliproperties.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 800 Hinesburg Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0860-00800.E 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION General project description (explain what you want approval for): Pizzagalli Properties is proposing to construct a new entrance and sidewalk on the west side of 800 Hinesburg Road. The new entrance and walk will provide better access to the existing parking lots. Walk totals 1,359 s.f. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 800 Hinesburg Road is an existing two story, 65,800 square foot office building situated on 17.32 acres with 274 parking spaces. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): No changes are proposed. Building will continue to be used as office space. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Existing building is approximately 65,800 gross square feet. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): West wing is 35' high. East wing is 48' high. Two floors f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Existing tenant (FairPoint) has roughly 180 employees. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 754,024 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 4.6 % / 34,927 sq. ft. Proposed 4.6 % / 34,927 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 25.4 % / 191,735 sq. ft. Proposed 25.6 % / 193,094 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing N/A % / N/A sq. ft. Proposed N/A % / N/A sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 3,000 s.f. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 35,000 b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): N/A 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N/A 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 8/31 /15 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedul Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. A-1W i 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. ,..,,SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Robert Bouchard TURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: 11 Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: • The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant statepermits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ray From: Bob Bouchard <Bob.Bouchard@pizzagalIiproperties.com> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 10:01 AM To: ray Subject: RE: 800 Hinesburg Road Hi Ray. We would propose planting 5' high cedar arborvitae. Bob Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 462 Shelburne Road, Suite 101 Burlington, VT 05401 T. 802.660.6805 F.802.660.6868 bbouchard(a)_pizzagaIli properties. com NOTICE: Our website can now be viewed at www.pizzagalliproperties.com. From: ray [mailto:ray@sburl.com] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 9:27 AM To: Bob Bouchard Subject: RE: 800 Hinesburg Road Thanks. Could you also tell me the botanical name of the plantings and the size at planting? Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential bylaw. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Bob Bouchard [mailto:Bob.Bouchard@pizzagalliproperties.com] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 9:19 AM To: ray Subject: RE: 800 Hinesburg Road Hi Ray: $1,000 for the cedar hedge around the transformer. Bob Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 462 Shelburne Road, Suite 101 Burlington, VT 05401 T. 802.660.6805 F.802.660.6868 bbouchard(a)-pizzagalliproperties.com i NOTICE: Our website can now be viewed at www.pizzagalliproperties.com. From: ray [mailto:ray@sburl.com] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 8:26 AM To: Bob Bouchard Subject: 800 Hinesburg Road :••, Could you please provide me with a budget for the "cedar hedge"? Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburi.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC T R A N S M I T T A L 346 Shelburne Road, Suite 601 Burlington, Vermont 05401 T 802.660.6800 F 802.660.6868 www.pizzagalIiproperties.com To Mr. Ray Belair From Bob Bouchard Address Administrative Officer Date/Time 5-21-2015 City of South Burlington Subject 800 Hinesburg Road 575 Dorset Street Application for Site Plan Review South Burlington, VT 05403 Enclosed Remarks Hi Ray: Attached please find the site plan showing the proposed new sidewalks on the west side of 800 Hinesburg Road. We will be preparing a zoning permit application soon, to conduct the actual construction work of installing the new sidewalks and new entrance. Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Bob Codes: A FOR INITIAL APPROVAL F QUOTATION REQUESTED K LETTER FOLLOWS B FOR FINAL APPROVAL G APPROVED L FOR FIELD CHECK C APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION REQUIRED H FOR APPROVAL M FOR YOUR USE D APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION NOT REQUIRED I AS REQUESTED OR REQUIRED N SEE REMARKS E DISAPPROVED - RESUBMIT J FOR USE IN ERECTION