HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-19-04 - Supplemental - 0068 Nesti Drive (11)Hi Jeremy:
So since the property lined moved, we no longer need the 9 replacement trees on 68 Nesti Drive property. However, plan for 1795 Shelburne Road (Autosaver lot) needs to show these existing
trees on that plan as that lot will now need to be responsible for them going forward as part of their approved landscaping plan.
Does this make sense to you?
DH
846-4115
From: Jeremy B. Owens <jeremy@tjboyle.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 2:23 PM
To: Dalila Hall <dhall@sburl.com>
Subject: Nesti Drive - dissolved property line
Okay, Fernando just informed me that the reason the pine trees are no longer on the Nesti Drive property is because the old property line was dissolved in 2018, and a new property line
was created further west. See attached Plat from CEA, as well as the screenshot below. I didn’t realize this because it was not in the CAD that was sent to me.
The screenshot below shows 11 pine trees that formerly were on the Nesti Drive property that are now on the Autosaver property.
Considering that these existing trees are in good health, is there still a need for 9 “replacement” trees?
Jeremy B. Owens, PLA
Senior Landscape Architect
T.J. Boyle Associates, LLC
301 College Street • Burlington, VT 05401 <https://www.google.com/maps/place/301+College+St,+Burlington,+VT+05401/@44.477156,-73.2097447,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x4cca7a585ca9753f:0x2b22424fa27b0
f09!8m2!3d44.477156!4d-73.207556> • (p) 802.658.3555
tjboyle.com <http://www.tjboyle.com/> • Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/tjboyleassociates>