Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0123 Highland Terrace4+ VERMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency of Natural Resources WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED io V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective December 1, 2010 Landowners: BJ & Jennifer Barrett 47 Highland Terrace South Burlington VT 05403 James & Elizabeth LaVallee 45 Highland Terrace South Burlington VT 05403 Permit Number: WW-4-3521-1 PIN: EJ10-0327 This permit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: o850-00047, o8 -o- 00045 referenced in the deed recorded in Books 1012, 1223 Pages 52-53, 37-39 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of a shared drilled well water supply for single family residence parcels 2B and 2C (previously approved in Permit # WW-4-3521), located off Highland Terrace in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. 1.GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown .on the plans and/or documents prepared by McCain Consulting, Inc., Gunner McCain, with the stamped plans listed as follows: Sheet Title Plan Date Plan Revision Date 1 of 1 Site Plan March 20, 2015 05/29/15 1.2 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits PRIOR to construction including, but not limited to, those that may be required from the Act 25o Environmental Commission; the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division; the Watershed Management Division; the Division of Fire Safety; the Vermont Department of Health; the Family Services Division; or other State departments and local officials. 1.3 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall record and index this permit in the City of South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. . 1.4 The landowner shall record and index all required installation certifications and other documents that are required to be filed under these Rules or under a specific permit condition in the City of South Burlington Land Records and ensure that copies of all certifications are sent to the Secretary. 1.5 No permit issued by the Secretary shall be valid for a substantially completed potable water supply until the Secretary receives a signed and dated certification from a qualified Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) that states: `I hereby certify that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply was installed in accordance with the permitted design and'all the permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfully met those performance tests", or which otherwise satisfies the requirements of §1-3o8 and §1-911 of the referenced rules. yy��AA.v �Y Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit `WW-4-3521-1 Page 2 of 2 1.6 Each purchaser of any portion of the project shall be shown a copy of the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit and the stamped plan(s), if applicable, prior to conveyance of any portion of the project to that purchaser. 1.7 By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations, and permit conditions. 1.8 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with 10 V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2.WATER SUPPLY 2.1 Each lot is approved for a shared potable water supply (located on Parcel 2B), using a drilled or percussion bedrock well for a maximum of 490 gallons of water per day per lot provided the supply is located as shown on the stamped plan(s) and meets or exceeds the isolation distances, construction standards, and water quality standards required in the Water Supply Rule. The landowner shall operate the potable water supply in a manner that keeps the supply free from contamination. The landowner shall immediately notify the Division if the water supply system fails to function properly and becomes a "failed supply". 2.2 The components of the potable water supply herein approved shall be routinely and reliably inspected during construction by a qualified Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) who shall, upon completion and prior to occupancy of the associated building, report in writing to the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division that the installation was accomplished in accordance with the referenced plans and permit conditions, as specifically directed in Condition #1.5 herein. 2.3 The water source location as shown on the stamped plan(s) shall be staked out and flagged by a qualified Vermont Licensed Designer prior to any construction on this project with the flagging being maintained until construction is complete. 2.4 A Homeowners' or Landowners' Association or equivalent legal entity shall be established, and registered with the Secretary of State, whose articles of association shall contain all necessary rights and easements for the full operation, maintenance, and repair of the community wastewater collection, delivery, and disposal system, including pretreatment units. Such rights shall also enable the users (and designees) thereof to enter upon the property for any construction, inspection, maintenance, and other such reasonable purposes as may arise regarding the wastewater disposal system. 2.5 All conditions set forth in Permit Number WW-4-3521 shall remain in effect except as amended or modified herein. David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Dated June 2, 2015 Wiffiam E. Za oski, Assistant Regional Engineer Essex Regional Office Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division cc South Burlington Planning Commission McCain Consulting, Inc. CITY CLERK' )OFFICE 00015700 V n 1026 PG-- 45 Received Sep 15r2011 11:60A Recorded in VDL} 1026 PG: 45 - a14 OF So. gurlinston Land Records Attest 1?ma Kin¢ille i_it9 Clerk TRUST CERTIFICATION William B. Wessel and Diane J. Wessel, Trustees of the Diane J. Wessel Trust established under a Trust Agreement dated November 20,1986 (the "Agreement"), as amended, hereby certify as follows: 1. The Settlor of the trust was Diane J. Wessel. The trustees are William B. Wessel and Diane J. Wessel. 2. The Diane J Wessel Trust was established as a means to empower the trustees to hold certain real and personal assets as provided under the terms of the Agreement, including those lands and premises located at 70 Highland Terrace in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. 3. The Trust Agreement specifically provides that the Trustees shall have the power to distribute the above property constituting a part of the trust estate. 4. The Agreement, the identity of the Trustees, and the rights, powers and duties of the Trustees under the Agreement have not been revoked and are in full force and effect; 5. The rights, powers and duties of the Trustees under the Agreement include the power to sell said lands and premises. 6. No consent of any beneficiary of the Trust is necessary prior to the Trustees exercising their rights, powers and duties under the Agreement. 7. The Trustee a beneficiary of the Trust. 8. Recordation of this Trust Certification shall constitute notice that the above described Trust Agreement remains effective and no further certification by the Trustees is required in order to effectively convey any portion of the real estate above described, unless and until subsequent notice is recorded. 9. The name and address of both Trustees empowered to act under the trust instrument at the time of the execution of this certificate is as follows: William B and Diane Wessel 70 Highland Terrace South Burlington, Vermont 05403 10. Trust Agreement provides, in Article VII (7.1)(b) as follows: "To sell, convey, exchange or mortgage any property, real or personal, to or with any person, in such manner and upon such terms Ashe Trustees may deem advisable, all without the necessity of obtaining leave of court; 11. The Trustee certifies that no provisions of the Trust and instrument limit the authority so granted. 12. This Trust is not supervised by any court. SIGNED UNDER SEAL this Liaday of September, 2011. -1 J 49XW'/ William B. Wes , Trustee of the Diane J. Wesel Trust A) Diane J Wes Trustee of the Diane J WesU Trust State of Vermont Chittenden County, SS On this day of September, 2011, before me personally appeared William B Wessel and Diane J. Wessel and they acknowledged this instrument by them sealed and subscribed to be their free act and deed and the free act and deed of the Diane J. Wessel Trust. Wpdocs\V\Real Estate\Trust.Certification.wessel Notary Public My Commission expires: 411 00015701 V: 1026 PG: 4 CITY CLERK'S C )"ICE Received SeP 1Sr2011 11:00A Recorded in VOL: 1026 PG. 47 - rJ' d OF So. Burlington Land Records Attoast y [Donna Kinville City Clerk DENSITY REDUCTION EASEMENT AND TRANSFER OF DEVELOPING RIGHTS TO RECEIVING PROPERTY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that William Wessel and Diane J. Wessel, Trustees of the Diane J. Wessel Trust, of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont ("Grantors"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to their full satisfaction by Brett J. Barrett and Jennifer R. Barrett, husband and wife, and Todd A. Barrett, of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont ("Grantees"), by these presents do freely give, grant, sell, convey and confirm unto the said Grantees, Brett J. Barrett and Jennifer R. Barrett and Todd A. Barrett, as joint tenants with rights of survivorship, and their successors and assigns forever, certain development rights pursuant to 24 V.S.A. Section 4423 and Article 9, Section 9.13(C)(1)(a) of the City of South Burlington Land Development Regulations as set forth below, in property located in the City of South Burlington, more particularly described as follows: Description of Sending Property: Being a portion of those lands and premises conveyed to Diane J. Wessel and William B. Wessel by Trust Deed of Diane J. Wessel dated December 2, 2005, and recorded at Volume 735, Pages 558-560 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Sending Property") and more particularly described as follows: Being a Density Reduction Easement to two parcels of land identified as "TDR Lot 1, 0.83 acre, 36,287.0 S.F." and "TDR Lot 2, 0.83 acre, 36,285.6 S.F.", all as more particularly shown and laid out on a plan entitled "TDR Plat, Diane J. Wessel Trust, 70 Highland Terrace, So. Burlington, VT", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE), dated June 24, 2011, of record at Map Slide SS` of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Development Rights Plan"). TDR Lot 1 is subject to a 15 foot pedestrian easement to the City of South Burlington, all as more particularly set forth on said Development Rights Plan. To said deed and plan of land, the records thereof and to the deed and records referred to therein, reference is hereby made in further aid of this description. The Sending Property is subject to and is benefitted by the City of South Burlington Land Development Regulations, last amended March 15, 2011 (the "Land Development Regulations"), a copy of which is on file with the City of South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. Under said Land Development Regulations in the SEQ-NRP District, each one (1) acre of the Sending Property has potential for development at a density of one and two -tenths (1.2) dwelling units or principal non-residential use. The development potential is referred to herein as "Development Rights". By this Density Reduction Easement, Grantors do hereby convey to Grantees the Development Rights for the Sending Property, consisting of 1.66 acres of land as shown on the Development Rights Plan as "TDR Lot 1, 0.83 acre, 36,287.0 S.F." and "TDR Lot 2, 0.83 acre, 36,285.6 S.F." on the easterly side of 70 Highland Terrace. Grantors retain the development rights for all of Grantors' retained lands depicted on the above -referenced plan (other than the Sending Property), subject to such modifications that may occur under the Land Development Regulations. The property interests being conveyed by this Density Reduction Easement consist solely of the transfer of Developments Rights from the Sending Property to the Receiving Property (defined below) and in all other respects, Grantors shall retain the fee title to the Sending Property, subject to the following covenants and restrictions which are imposed for the benefit of the public pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 155 and shall run with and bind the Sending Property in perpetuity: (a) There shall be no construction or placing of any buildings or structures of any kind, temporary or permanent on the Sending Property, except the Grantors, their heirs, successors and assigns, shall have the right, subject to approval under the Land Development Regulations, where applicable, to construct non-residential structures with related access drives and utilities on the Sending Property necessary for storage of equipment and materials used in connection with agricultural or forestry activities on the Sending Property or adjacent lands of the Grantors, their heirs, successors and assigns. (b) There shall be no filling, excavating, dredging, mining or drilling, removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, minerals or other materials, nor any building of roads or change in the topography of the land in any manner. (c) Grantors, their heirs, successors and assigns, shall have the right to maintain the Sending Property in an orderly and presentable manner including the right to utilize the Sending Property for agricultural and forestry purposes, plant trees and shrubbery, to keep the fields mowed and to take any other normal action in maintaining the appearance of the open space. (d) There shall be no dumping of ashes, trash, garbage, or other unsightly or offensive material, and no changing of the topography through the placing of soil or other substance or materials such as landfill. (e) There shall be no operation of dune buggies, motorcycles, all -terrain vehicles or any other types of motorized vehicles on the Sending Property, except: (1) snowmobiles; and (2) motorized vehicles used for the maintenance of the Sending Property for the purposes described below or for forestry or agricultural purposes. Grantors, their heirs and assigns, shall have the right to clear, construction and maintain trails for non-commercial snowmobiling, walking, bicycling, horseback riding, skiing, and other non-commercial, recreational activities within and across the Sending Property, all in a manner consistent with these open space provisions. (f) There shall be no activities or uses on the Sending Property which shall be detrimental or could be detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, fish and wildlife or habitat preservation. Grantors hereby grant solely and exclusively to the City of South Burlington (1) the right of official representatives of the City, in a reasonable manner and at reasonable times, to enter and 00015701 ► V = 1026 PG-- 4- inspect the property; and (2) the right to enforce, on behalf of the public, by injunction or proceedings at law or in equity, the above -stated covenants. Nothing stated herein shall be interpreted to grant the public any right of access to the Sending Property. All rights retained by the Grantors, as above -described, shall run with the title to the Sending Property and shall be transferred automatically to any successor fee owner of the Sending Property. If the Land Development Regulations are hereafter changed in a way that ascribes development potential to the Sending Property on any basis other than that described above, the City shall implement the terms of this easement by developing a method to equate the above -described development potential to the new development potential. The Development Rights hereby conveyed to Grantees provide the present potential for the development of two (2) development units, as determined under the Land Development Regulations, to be used in connection with the development of the following described receiving property: Description of Receiving Property Being those lands and premises being more particularly described on "Exhibit B (110579)" and "Exhibit B (110580)" attached hereto. Reference is hereby made to the foregoing deeds, plans and regulations, and the records thereof, and to all documents therein referred to and the records thereof, in aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said granted Development Rights, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantees, Brett J. Barrett and Jennifer R. Barrett and Todd A. Barrett, as joint tenants with rights of survivorship, and their successors and assigns, to their own use as provided herein, forever; and the said Grantors, William Wessel and Diane J. Wessel, Trustees of the Diane J. Wessel Trust, do for themselves, and their heirs and assigns, covenant with Grantees and their successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, they are the sole owners of the Development Rights, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are free from every encumbrance; except as aforesaid, and they hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatsoever, except as aforementioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have executed this Density Reduction Easement on this !� day of September, 2011. illiam essel, Trustee of th Diane J. Wessel Trust I, bi)a,� Diane J. Wessel Olustee of the Diane J. Wessel Trust 00015701 ` V - 1026 PG -- STATE OF VERMONT CMTTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At S L-rrh &0.1,4 d_13A , Vermont, this /3-)�day of September, 2011, personally appeared William Wessel arg Diane J. Wessel, Trustees of the Diane J. Wessel Trust, and acknowledged this instrument, by them sealed and subscribed, to be their free act and deed and the free act and deed of the Diane J. Wessel Trust. Wpd=\V\Real Estate\Wessel.TDR.Deed Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2/10/15 Vermont Property Transfer Tax 32 V-S-A. Chap 231 —ACKNOWLEDGEMENT— RETURN REC'D—TAX PAID BOARD OF HEALTH CERT. REC'D, VT LAND USE h DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACT. CERT. REC'D Return No- ------------------------- Donna Kinville City Clerk Gate Sea 15r2011 0Ci1=t1033-3 � V : 956 PG: 77 TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AGREEMENT This Agreement is made the date herein below set forth by and between WILLIAM WESSEL and DIANE J. WESSEL , Trustees of the Diane J. Wessel Trust, of South Burlington, Vermont, (hereinafter collectively "Wessel") and ALGIMANTAS SHALNA and NERINGA SHALNA, husband and wife, of Williston, Vermont, (hereinafter collectively "Shalna"), to wit: WHEREAS, Shalna has received approval from the City of South Burlington Development Review Board (hereinafter "DRB") to subdivide a 39,450 square foot parcel located at 45 Highland Terrace, South Burlington, Vermont, into three lots; and WHEREAS, the proposed density exceeds the maximum base density allowed by the South Burlington Land Development Regulations; and WHEREAS, to accommodate the approved subdivision, Shalna must acquire two additional development rights per Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations; and WHEREAS, Wessel has agreed to sell two development rights to Shalna. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Shalna agrees to purchase two development right units from Wessel for the sum of $15,000.00 per unit. Shalna may purchase one or both units at any one time. 2. Shalna shall notify Diane or William Wessel, Trustees of the Diane J Wessel Trust, in writing of their intent to purchase the development rights described in Paragraph one hereof. Within 10 days of receiving notice, the Trustees shall diligently commence obtaining a survey of the property to identify the development right parcel and upon receipt of the survey thereafter obtain approval from the City of South Burlington Development Review Board for transfer of the development right(s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event a closing has not occurred within one year of the date hereof, this Agreement shall be void and of no further JOSEPH D_ FA LON ATTORMEY AT LAW P. O. BOX 257 10729 ROUTE 116 FIIPESSURG. VT 05461 Post -it® Fax N e 7671 Date pages► To From Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Received Sep lOr2010 12:35P Recirded in VOL: 956 PG: 77- 76 OF So. Purlinston Land Records Attest : Donna Kinville My ('-Jerk I C1001C1333 V.- 9156 PG: force and effect unless Shama has within the one year exercised their intent to purchase and Wessel is diligently pursuing the approvals for transfer. 3. � This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 4. No change, modification, amendment, addition or deletion affecting this i Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by the parties hereto. 5. AlI notices required to be given hereunder shall be sent to the parties at the following addresses: Algimantas and Neringa Shalna William and Diane Wessel, Trustees 7951 Williston Road i 1 a cQ. Williston, VT 05495 7T-gc DATED at `t-c n ,Vermont, this day of 2010. DIANE J. WESSEL TRUST � LIAM WESSEL TR T � US EE , DIANE J. WE L, TRUSTEE DATED at �"ont, this ID day of 2010. —' j ALGIMANTAS SHALNA NERINGA HALNA JOSEPH D. FALCON . ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 257 10729 ROUTE 116 HINESBURG, VT 05461 - 2 C502) 482-Z137 E �i . ii a, I "73 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING S7S DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT OS403 (802)846-4106 April 19, 2007 Joseph & Lisa Malley 1425 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the May 1, 2007 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely," 1� 1 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. �ITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO, � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 April 19, 2007 Judith Lavanway 1440 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburi.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the May 1, 2007 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, -)� M—aka*---9 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. I Homer & Mons Dubois 1 I I 1 I EX18PNG 0860.01405 1 DRILLED 1 WELL I 1 o IS' APPLE 470 I `M o iP- EXISTING 1 DRIVEWAY I I < 1 I � I c 1 24" MAPLE EXISTING Joseph & Lisp Mdley i;- ¢�'y (� DRILLED 0860-D1425 WELL 1 5" APPLE 1 1 I MAPLE I30' 6" APPLE m 0 I � 1 \ I ,Judith Lwanwoy 0860-01440 L 1 1 IRF 6' APPLE 1 x -2 ULA PARCEL 2 0.9t ACRES o ARCEL 1 i TP-3John & Putiaio tor a0.7 ACRES 30 VE: 18' AP "APLEHED ROWm 5" ASH \\ \ - MHO I W MAPLE r I\ I o E%SPNG HOUSE GREENHO S 24'' ASH SE 18" RED PINE\� 5' APPLE 1 1 n 1 (3) 6' APPLE IPF e, I (6) 17 RED PINE ROW - �- 2a1t '�:J .SO" MAPLE Douglas &Elaine MoPres 1 I 0850-OM LEGEND I. _ ATP-T GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET i inch 20 fL Topograpky by Total Station Contp—v Int—al 2' Assnnaed Datum ® Well 0IPF Iron ppe bond @IRF Iran Tod lourd (D PP Ulili,t, We SeJ Tree c Gay *s x Borbed wits lence Wooden fence 0-1,h ad Power lines 100 10' cpinlaurs 2' codloum J Tree Nee Prwoq Ime Right �Io�f woy line 7 Ditch roinoge swde it SITE PLAN ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA TWO LOT SUBDIVISION Y� GO�� ROUTE 116 & HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT THIS IS N07 A SURVEY. THIS PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE 04' SCALE : I" = 20'. MCC IN CONSULTING, INC. REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA SEC. 1403 FOR THE FILING DESIGNED BY: GNM PROJECT : N28103 OF SLJRYEY PLATS. 41DRAWN BY: SJH 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET CHECKED BY: GNM WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 SITE TECHNICIAN: GUNNER MCCAIN DATE: APRIL 10, 2007 SHEET I OF I Y: C.dd 26000o\26l03 dw 261O3 4-10-07.dw B-237 i VINYL LOUVRE 10.12 1R 12 10:12 S:1 FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Ly SLAB 7: i 2 � 10' FRIEZE BOARD RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4' - V-0' m LEFT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Ell REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" - V-0" W �U LI.{ _0 0 w J i— W e v 6 O SCole 1/4'.F.0 ' D+o— by LIID Dole */"0" 1 Sheet _L Of -0" f: 9LCOCK I 11' SON0IUBES tc ii I t imC.......,_...� I PORCH ; ABOVE I3 t 3tQ L _ 16" WALL "� BEAM POCKET FOOTING 0 ° rFUTURE WALLS n 8" FNDN. WALL t-'*v INSTALL DRAINS I SILCOCK AT CONSTRUCTION Al r^ FUTURE FINISHED SPACE h,1 i6" WALL Foc I� / IZ pis 8" FNDN. WALL l t� 3 i 3ahEGHANIC:�L_____y^_ m p SEE OWNER FOR `�X�W LOCATION OF MECHANICAL �- �MECH'"S ;P UNITS & FOR VENTING yA 24" XTHK FOOTINGNG (2)2) 1 WALLUP — I g�l I I I II I I II it GARAGEABOVE --------- I SUPPORTS FLOM ABOVE o 16" WALL FOC B" FNDN. WALL 0 f 51LC= t,�—.�VEA M POCKET /7 4'-6" I .o I I 16'-6 9" ` 3'-6 L_ J 0 14• 6— I r-O" -0" FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 15-0" 17'-0" 2'-6" 10'-0" 2.-6.. 5'-0" 5'-0" CANTILEVER WINDOW SEAT o 8'-6" 8'-6" 0 _ o o 5C. PORCH ITK10• .o SLOPE SLOPE DR, HOR. TRANSOM ABOVE I I I Y v DBL OVEN I _ 3' 6" i 3 i\\ I i GMAT \ I�•- 0 ;•; KITCHEN IX 13'-3" 3'-8}" 0 9'-3J" I o 14 T O 10.25" a LANDING PTY, 16 R O 7.5" RAILING 3680 54" UP i iiARAGE Y-11" NV ATED C ON 3080 C� B •I 6 -2" rilAJ 3680 ENTRY o o CLO, a o� n3 o "1 I6• % 8. CHO DOOR I DEN 9'-0" 9'-0'• o 9•_ 1' ` TRAY _____ PORCH 5'-0" 5-0" 14'-6" 4'-0" 10'-0" 18,-0" 32'-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1132 ;, SCALE: 1/4" = l'-O" TOTAL 2390 st i Lu LL V/ r l n O a` o $cote 1/4'.I••®' Drown by LRD Dole 61WO11 A-2 feel 1 or LEGEND __-- DROP HEADER o POST 1/2 WALL RAILING & BALUSTERS NOTES, I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE STUD TO STUD. 2. WINDOWS AND DOORS TO CENTERLINE o OF OPEN NO 3. INTERIOR WALLS 3 1/2" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE < _ EXTERIOR WALLS S 1/2". < ~ ps 4. ALL DOORS AND INTERIM OPENINGS ARE 6'-6". UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. S. WINDOW HEADERS AT r-11". FIRST FLOOR. 6'-11" SECOND FLOOR. V.N.O. qg� 6. FIRST ROOK HEIGHT AT III SECOND FLOOR AT 8'-1". ¢ . I 80f 32'-0" m 9 — — — — —^ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — " c (G� e 0 I I I I I I 10, I •���` I I� tBag I I I I ro I I I I .' 1*-0" TYPICAL ALL AROUND I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J _ —NOR , I n I I I I I ~ o TYPICAL ALL AROUND _Q1'-0" I ON n SLI4 I \ / SLOPE i i SLOPEMASTER I Q 5EDROPM VAULTED CEILING:'I I / VAULTED CEILING: \ 1 -T5.- I \ FixEb— o----- -- L o L------------------I---I 0 6 O SCo1■ U ¢ , Dro— by LRE I I Dote 6/W2M I I Revisions I I I , I I O•o■ing Numbs A-3 SECOND FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" $heel J OI J — — 1257 111 1 II � I ■ �� ray From: Pat Trutor [eistap@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 1:03 PM To: ray Subject: BJ and Jennifer Barrett Highland Terrace design review Ray Belair, I am unable to attend this evening's DRB meeting. I would ask you to consider the following concerns and advise participants as the Board sees fit. 1: Highland Terrace is not wide enough to safely support on -street parking. Use of the street for ongoing parking should be discouraged. Remember there are no sidewalks or street -lights to protect pedestrians! 2: Does the City allow developers to make changes to land elevation without an approved drainage plan? It is important that appropriate drainage plans are addressed. Brad Gardner's Highland Terrace project is an example of a lack of adequate drainage planning when changes to elevation/topography are involved. Thank you for your consideration of these concerns. Pat Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT e-mail:pat@trutor.com 1 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, AICP, Associate Plann r V v DATE: June 30, 2011 Final Plat Application #SD-11-22 B.J. & Jennifer Barrett and Todd Barrett Meetin Date: July 5, 2011 Final plat application #SD-11-22 of B.J. & Jennifer Barrett and Todd Barrett to amend a previously approved three (3) lot subdivision. The amendment consists of reviewing the residential design of the houses proposed for 45 & 47 Highland Terrace. This application follows a previous approval for a three lot subdivision. As building specifications were not ready at the time, the approval for the three lot subdivision stated that the remaining lots must receive residential design approval from the Development Review Board prior to construction of any additional units. The criteria for residential design in the Southeast Quadrant are as follows: Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets). The applicant has submitted building types for both lots which meet this criterion. The homes are set close the street and have main entrances facing Highland Terrace. (2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi- private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. The applicant has submitted building types for two lots. On the site plan, they appear to mirror each other. The elevations and specifications show that they are proposed to be similar in layout, but with some variation to the materials and appearance. One unit will have a small front porch, while the other has a stone fagade. Staff finds that these criteria are fully met. (3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings should be set back fifteen feet (15') from the back of sidewalk. This criterion is being met. The buildings are within the suggested setback, and have a close relationship to the street. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (81) into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. The applicant is proposing one small porch which is open and meets this criterion. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. The applicant has submitted details, for two lots. Both building footprints show compliance with this criterion, with the garages being set back eight (8) feet from the front building line (not including the porch). OTHER The applicants will need to transfer two (2) development rights prior to permit issuance. 1. The applicant shall complete the transfer of two development right, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, prior to permit issuance. Staff recommends that the DRB approve final plat application #SD-11-22 subject to the conditional item included in this staff report. PA CEL PERMII[ED WELL LOi AIIUN GARDEN 1�'1G S(�•L�T G�. � I 1 11 JJ J �rZZ 11'� 11 N 18` APPLE 8` APPLE moddeus p h ,.. n Jamie Frolom N I r-' 0860-01150 '�-�'^�'^' ' HIED ROW .. _ � ((jjam� �.._ _ �. I1,�- I f.ARDEN 1 - �� 5" ASH r Vr 15- MAPLE _ - I A EXlsnec HOUSE ) �I:kEEIJI, Ic'�d 240' ASH PARCEL 2C IB- RED PINE 1 ,070 SQ. FT. I 1 � n PERMITTED WELL LOCANON 5 APPLE s. aNP� IgMSC AS (8) 12` RED PINE ROW_ ......... — w! � a EXISTING�,— �� SEPNC IPNK Daglae h Eloine Mahe, -- 16Tt �— 0850 00009 GRAPHIC SCALE ea IN FBET ) I ineH - 20 IT Topography by Total! Station -Cart—, Internal 2' A. —fined Datum Y. 1 I John 8 Patricia iralrc 0850-0(XHO r 1 I 1 _ I I6 I LEGEND Lee x Barbed wire I— I00 10' caloare 2- —Inurs tree We FrapHlY line Right of way line > Oilch/danage swore Balding envelope — $ Sewer line RECEIVED JUN 0 3 2011 City of So. Budinatinn "`e Other. -Paper • www.otherpa Clas irc * 101 PUBLIC NOTICE next week and needs a ride. Can leave with a wood stove for many years. With a from the corner of Swift St and Shelburne little TLC it could look like new Pictures Public Hearing Rd. or another place. Working hours are can be emaded if: requested. Asking $350 South Burlington Development not definite yet .'If you can share a ride fox will sell for $300. 598-8193 (06/02) " Review Board a maximum of 8 weeks or less it would be The South very helpful. 864-9321 or email BICYCLE: 26" Coors Light bike, silver. Burlington Development Review Glopatinvt@comcast.net. (06/16) Multi -speed brand. New; still in the box. Board will hold a public hearing in the South $125. 862-7901 (06/02) Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 SEEKING 2 BDRM. APT/HOME: Mature Dorset Street,South Burlington, Vermont on (50+), responsible person seeks unfur- CANOE: Kevlar canoe, hardly used, excel - July 5, 2011 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the fol- coshed apt/home in Oakledge or adjacent lent condition. 13 feet, 28 pounds.$600. lowing: area. Exceptional tenant with outstand 658-2245 (06/09) ing landlord' references Previous home- 10, Final plat application #SD-11-22 of B.J. & Jen owner who cares about property and up- `'CRIB: Like new Sealy mattress, mattress nifer Barrett and Todd Barrettto amend a pre- keep. Loves light, quiet streets, friendly pad; crib sheet, bumper pads, mobile. $k viously approved three (3) lot subdivision. The neighbors.Win consider roommate if right- 864-08.13 (06/16) h amendment consists of reviewing the residen match. Occupation/interests: music (so- t, tial design of the houses proposed for 45_& loist) environment (Lake Champlain) so- DINGY: Mercury Quicksilver inflatable 3 47 Highland Terrace. cial services (professional). 734-2617 (06/ dingy —used one season, seats 4, out- 09) board Mercury 2.2 motor, oars. $400. 399- R Mark Behr, Chairman 2312 (06/02) h South Burlington Development Review Board LOST 1E DRAPES: Custom, professionally fabri- ri Copies of the, application are available for pub- LOST: Tiny green Ugly Doll (Po) floated cated drapery seta Finest quality material 6' lic inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. away from Brewer Parkway attached to tsed.wth backed with white liner. 6' gold - dragonfly -shaped helium balloon. Great traverse rod,. all hardware: included. Fits R June 16, 2011 sentimental value. If found, call'864-3933. 5' x T window Light teal green. $125. 497- h TAG SALE 9056 (06/02) LOST. CAT: Missing since 5/26 from Si CENTER: Solid oak. ^24 GARAGE SALE: Saturday, June 18, 9a.m. to in SB.' Shorthair tortoise -shell (black/ Lots of storage space. Center piece for the Baldwin Avenue (Orchard School district) ENTERTAINMENT "CENTER: p.m., 1945 Dorset St. just past Dorset white/orange) spayed female. No collar, TV, DVD Player and VCR with two cabi- SE Farms, SB. Crafter's unfinished wood prod- Possible sighting in Stonehenge neigh- nets, and two side pieces with glass. doors in ucts and mauy'finished pieces. Old sew_ borhood. Please check your garage and (Perfect for knick knacks and a stereo sys- 8( ing machine in cabinet. Many other items. garden sheds - she may have taken cover tem). ,Paid $1,400, asking $500 or best of - Burn coal? Loaded in plastic totes. Make- during the storm on 5/26. If you see her fer. 33872326 (06/16) St an offer. or have information about her where- sh abouts, please call 863-9538. (06/09) GUITAR HERO and Guitar Hero II 86 GARAGE SALE` Saturday, June 18, 9 a.m. - (Playstation 2) disc. $35. 658-5815 (06/16) 3 p.m. 1955 Dorset Street in SB. Just past LOST MAINE COON CAT. Last seen May SC Dorset Farms. Lots of baby clothing and 13 on Laurel Hill Drive in SB. He is alarge HATS Ladies vintage hats. `50s and '60s. PI; gear. High chair, bouncy seat and toys. Flat silver tabby Maine Coon cat. Please call if Nine in all. Various colors and shapes. (01 screen TV stand, kitchen table, bar stools You find him...864-5861 (06/02)` Make an offer. 862-7271 (06/16) and dish' ware. Rain date is Sunday, June TI. 19, 10 a.m.-2 p.m. FORSALE ITEMS: Small Estate Sale: Royal Albert Po Country Roses bone china, crystal glass- so;. GARAGE SALE: June 24-26. Baby/kid .21 OVAL DIAMOND PENDANT with ware' crystal decanteur, dining room table Jo! clothes, toys, books. 31 Mills Avenue. SB. smaller diamonds surrounding the larger (expandable) with 6 chairs and matching diamond. Loose diamond was originallyhutch, 4 matching end tables, variety of TV FREE .-framed prints and miscellaneous items. purchased at Fremeau's jewelers _(I have ( be; original receipt) and is excellent quality. 658-3584 06l02) qu ITEMS: Must Pickup. Good working con- Stone was reset by Fremeau's jewelers in 16; dition refrigerator/freezer. Must move .2004 into current setting. Will meet you at LARGE BREED DOG CAGE: Use for Puppy . W( from basement (6 "stairs through bulk- a local jewelers so that quality and cut can Training up to 70 lbs. $50 or bestoffer. head); Baby gate, excellent condition. 238- be verified by a jeweler. $250. 859-3380 864-6540 (06/09) lute 2260 (06/16) (06/09) got LAWN MOWER: Ariens Zoom Zero Turn for. WANTED AC UNITS: Two brand new units. Never lawrunower. Model 1944 Zoom, commer- Lei used. .Asking $250 and $150, Email cial lawnmower with under 100 hours, 19 sm' used. se king $250 and $16j HP �n cylinder Kohler Commander en - RIDE SHARE TO WATERBURY. 19-year- gine, 44" Deck, 7.5 mph forward/ 2.5 mph VF old starting job with GMCR in Waterbury "ANTIQUE SERVING BUFFET. Unsure of reverse, hydrostatic transmission, 7 cut- BC date it was made. In grandparents house tmg height adjustments, 2 large gas tanks and extra set of blades. ' $2,300. 735-7564 (06/09) DO or u11f16. a-� 11R1-_nnr: c.„ n r June 21, 2011 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a notice for an upcoming public hearing of the South Burlington Development Review Board. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. kmo Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on July 5, 2011 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD-11-22 of B.J. & Jennifer Barrett and Todd Barrett to amend a previously approved three (3) lot subdivision. The amendment consists of reviewing the residential design of the houses proposed for 45 & 47 Highland Terrace. Mark Behr, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. June 16, 2011 l 4► south)-urfing tou PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD- - (office use on y) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑ Preliminary 4inal PUD Being Requested? Zes ❑ No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) S 7 <' S 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) V0iuw%f- t+S4- 310 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) ay o.nd ScA1\ Jr it — AW4- z Vallc� Z,d4c. V-d so, (iutle" n V i C�di) '�3y- 502.Z # 4� Todd #�jcarrlc* Puw%e V fti , S4utt� L3vr l,nc�rev\ VT OS403 9 SI ' 113 Ff 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Ke R�% nri —(0 �iradwyjulCw! ��, Sb, t? Jon V1 a. Contact email address: 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: �{�- h� q�.�nC�'� ✓�- �-- so, Burl . VT" i3w I. VT 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) O SO 0004" ' 01?-So - 0004k 5 - 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing)): �l '1`f RC-M M, hannc.. - 71104 S , ff 3 �G0.fvornS b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 4tf Ivan Nave_.. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): # 4 Z, 14 o4 s'4( r+ S I An: l 1^0 M d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildin s and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): IV' l l 21 6 A r, u ' fro"\ 1P C e- - c o,nC 40va Z arS aid a Pp Sc�l►.crt� - a 31, �� f n f. Numbet&of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 5 g. Numbo of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): q-+ /Ve n e, 45 /Vcne.- h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 44 NNa&1- �-� S ►�Vort/� i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. yS p1oN f Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 8. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 3 k 5o (acres /sq. ft.) b. Building Coverage: Existing 0 square feet Q % Proposed \3 i % square feet (O % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing U Proposed 'LSAO square feet 0 % square feet I Z' % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing Proposed 9. WETLAND INFORMATION square feet % square feet % a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or I1I) on the subject property? ❑ Yes t"/No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 9I(X.) SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 l 8. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: \ 3, 0 `- (acres /sq. ft.) Ij b. Building Coverage: Existing O square feet U % Proposed %a square feet _ % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing O Proposed 7-100 square feet © % square feet j � % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed square feet % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I,11, or 11I) on the subject property? ❑ Yes W No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: Ci - (00 SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 } 11. COST ESTIMATES -0 q -4 -9 q -�;- a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 30S0ate, °° 000,00 b.Landscaping: $ y,s00•00 (Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) *41-t - # ys Dr,k" yr iO *y4 * q5 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): y :oo PM-5� �M ��',00 PM- a �00 (� 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: '�'00 A'^' s"00 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 4 ` q - TS 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: I Z0 t 7- 16. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). 17. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format, on compact disk) of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. 4 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. A0 W S Ll7 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: f l'du I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: PRINT NAME The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 BJ and Jennifer Barrett Proposed Landscaping 47 Highland Terracce Parcel 2-b 1. Front, back, and side yards to recieve 4" of topsoil 2. Grass seed on all disturbed areas of building lot 3. Front of the house to recieve 3 bark mulch flower beds 4. Blue stone walk -way from driveway to main entry 5. Paved driveway infront of the garage door to road 6. 1 lilac tree and lamp post in front yard Estimated Cost: $4,500.00 Todd Barrett Proposed Landscaping 45 Highland Terracce Parcel 2-C 1. Front, back, and side yards to recieve 4" of topsoil 2. Grass seed on all disturbed areas of building lot 3. Front of the house to recieve 3 bark mulch flower beds 4. Blue stone walk -way from driveway to main entry 5. Paved driveway infront of the garage door to road 6. 1 lilac tree and lamp post in front yard Estimated Cost: $4,500.00 Contiguous Properties For: 45 and 47 Highland Terrace Parcel 2-c, and Parcel 2-b Owners of Record Of All Contiguous Properties and Mailing Addresses: 1. Nate Malley 49 Highland Terrace, So. Burlington, VT 05403 2. Thaddeus MCDougal 1450 Hinesburge Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 3. Algimantas Shalna 25 Slate Barn Rd. Williston, VT 05495 Current Owner of (45 and 47 Highland Terrace, So. Burlington, VT 05403) 4. John and Patricia Trutor 40 Highland Terrace, So. Burlington, VT 05403 5. Gardener 30 Highland Terrace, So. Burlington, VT 05403 6. Maynes 9 Highland Terrace, So. Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Stormwater Services 575 Dorset Street • South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: (8021 658-7961 • Fax: (802) 658-7976 May 31, 2011 Dear Algimantas Shalna, Office Dept. of Public Works 104 Landfill Road City staff previously contacted you regarding a sediment laden stormwater discharge and insufficient erosion prevention and sediment control measures at your construction site located at 45 Highland Terrace. City ordinance 9.06(B)(4) requires you to employ sufficient erosion control measures to prevent discharges of this type from occurring. In addition these discharges classify as an illicit discharge under the South Burlington Sewer and Stormwater Ordinance (Article 5). The City of South Burlington has decided to pursue enforcement action as specified in Article VII of the South Burlington Sewer and Stormwater Ordinance. Included with this letter is a fine (Article VII, Section 2) for allowing an illicit discharge to enter into the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). Within the next 48 hours you must implement construction best management practices and install. erosion prevention and sediment control measures at the construction site located on 45 Highland Terrace and along the west side of Highland Terrace. You are required to take the following steps to correct this problem: • Remove sediment washed into the roadway at the intersection of Dubois Drive and Highland Terrace. Remove sediment that has washed down Dubois Drive. Repair silt fence installed at this intersection. • Repair the erosion behind the curb on Highland Terrace. • Regrade the ditchline on the west side of Highland Terrace to repair erosion. Mulch this area with erosion control fabric. Reinstall the failed stone check darns in this ditchline. Install additional stone check dams in the swale to prevent additional erosion. • Remove accumulated silt at the stormwater outfall near 70 Highland Terrace. • Mulch the construction site located at 45 Highland Terrace. If the above measures are not taken within the net 48 hours, the City, or persons retained by the City, will enter onto the subject property and take any and all measures necessary to abate the violations described above. The cost of such action is the responsibility of the property owner and will be billed to you directly (South Burlington Sewer and Stormwater Ordinance Article VII, Section 2(d)). I hope that we can work together to eliminate this discharge and continue to protect surface waters in South Burlington. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (802) 658-7961 x108. Sincer ly, Tho its J. DiPietro Jr. Stormwater Superintendent South Burlington Stormwater Services Division Cc: Justin Rabidoux, Director of Public Works Tom Hergenrother �4 t„ 4 2d ft`� }ied 1 7;.nktiMq�.ro«5,:�;451: �s F•? o- +t r a�d MJ�sU. a�`.i Av t ���--•_�--� ` "jam ui LuDo1s iinve and Highland Terrace. Silt fence not maintained. ...111 1- —a—lu tucux uum in aitcnllne on Highland Terrace has not been removed as requested in a 4/29/11 email to Tom Hergenrother. I ----r-�Y�--r --OL" VU CUM UMIMInLainea cnecx clam on Highland Terrace has caused damage to the paved surface of Highland Terrace. -- ---�s„ =eau --auc on nigniana 1 errace caused by poor management of stormwater runoff associated with construction of 45 Highland Terrace. Sediment at the stormwater outfall near 70 Highland Terrace. The City recently worked with the adjacent property owner to repair this outfall. Sediment in stone lined ditch needs to be removed. i ne construction site at 4J Highland "Terrace was not stabilized before winter and no measures have been taken this spring to stabilize the site. AGENCY OF NATURP" RESOURCES (ANR) AND NATURAL 7ESOURCES BOARD http:/rwww.an!.st. �.vt.us/dacread/palindez.ntrrE l htt �JivE� ).nrL,.state.v*,;.us-- PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOTAL # OF DEC PERMITS: PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW: RESPONSE DATE: PENDING APPLICATION #: WW-4-3521 DISTRICT: TOWN: South Burlington PIN: EJ10-0327 OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: (Name) Algimantas and Neringa Shalna I (Name) (Address) 25 Slate Barn Drive (Address) (Town) (State) (Zip) Williston VT 05495 (Town) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) (802)-355-8495 (Telephone) Proiect Name. - Based on a written or oral request or information provided by Gunner McCain, received on 6/21/2010, a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of 0.91 acres, located on Highland Terrace. The project is generally described as: Permit the subdivision of 0.91A; lots 2A, 2B and 2C each for a proposed 4 bedroom single family residence served by individual onsite water supplies and municipal wastewater disposal. Prior permits from this office: PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ® I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coc V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. istrict Coordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 Permit Specialist ❑ Other Person ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST 1. FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LAN DOWNER/AGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PERSON OR ENTITY WILL BE BOUND BY THIS OPINION UNLESS THAT PERSON OR ENTITY FILES A REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION WITH THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR (10 V.S.A. § 6007 (c) AND ACT 250 RULE 3 (b) OR AN APPEAL WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL, COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V. S.A. Chapter 220). (#47) ** Project: ❑ Commercial )Residential ❑ Municipal Has the landowner subdivided before? ❑ Yes �j No When/where: _ # of lots: AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: ❑ Yes )SNo Copies sent to Owner: Yet 6❑ No; _ �_ Applicant or Representative: ❑ Yes ❑ No BASIS FOR -DECISION: A'�`�`� SIGNATURE. _,' 1!� DATE: " x' ;>'��'F ADDRESS: District # Environmental Commission 71 Distrid' Coordinator Telephone: �� C� WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED? Z' Yes ❑ No E Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit (#1. & #2)** ❑ Notice of Permit Requirements (deferral language) (#2) ❑ Floor Drains (# 1.2) ❑ Campgrounds (#3) ? >' Extension of sewer lines (#5) REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: William Zabiloski r SIGNATURE: DATE: 8-26-10 ADDRESS: Dept. of Environmental Conservation Environmenta its rice Office, Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Telephone: 802-879-5676 ❑ Wastewater Ida agement Division, Telephone: 802-879-5656 OVER »»»»»»» **NOTE: NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES (#) REFER TO PERMIT INFORMATION SHEETS IN THE VERMONT PERMIT HANDBOOK http.1/www°.anr.state.vt.usldeclpermit hblindes:.htm THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BIND DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PE TS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONJ RUCTION: PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPAk r MENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact: ❑ Discharge Permits: pretreatment; industrial, municipal (#7_1, 7_2, & 8) ❑ Indirect Discharge Permits (#9 & 9_1) ❑ Residuals Management (#10) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888-520-4879) Contact: ❑ Construction/modification of source ( 14) ❑ Open Burning (#18) ❑ Wood Chip Burners(>90 HP) (#14) ❑ Furnace Boiler Conversion/installation (#14) ❑ Industrial Process Air Emissions (#14) ❑ Diesel Engines (>450 bHP) (#14) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) (800-823-6500 in VT) Contact: ❑ New Hydrants #22) ❑ >500' waterline construction (#22) ❑ Community Water System (CWS) ❑ Bottled Water (#20) ❑ Operating permit (#21) ❑ Transient Non -Community water system (TNC) (#21) ❑ Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water systems (NTNC) (#21) 6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR STORMWATER PERMITS (#6 — 6.5) Contact: Contact: ❑ Flood Plains (241-3759) ❑ Ponds (#32.1) ❑ Construction General Permits >1AC of disturbance (#6.1) ❑ Shoreland Encroachment (241-3777) Steve Hanna (#28) ❑ Stormwater from new development or redevelopment sites (#6.2 & 6_3) ❑ Wetlands (241-3770) (#29) ❑ Multi -Sector General Permit (MSGP) industrial activities w/ SIC codes(#6A) ❑ Stream Alteration / Section 401 Water Quality Certification / Stream Crossing Structures Chris Brunelle 879-5631 (#27 & 32) t. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Dennis Fekert 241-1493 ❑ Hazardous Waste Handier site ID (241-3888) (#36) ❑ Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) June Reilly (#33) ❑ Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities drop off (241-3444) (#37,39,40) ❑Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) 1771 Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) (#41 & 44) ❑ Composting Facilities (241-3444) (#43) ❑ Waste oil burning (241-3888) ❑ Waste transporter permit (#35) ❑ Demolition waste 241-3477 ❑ Used septic system components/stone (#41) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: _ ❑ Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.) (241-3451) (#45) ❑ State -funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) (#46) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS & MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: Judy Mirro/John Daly 10. FISH & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT (802-241-3700) Contact: ❑ Nongame & Natural Heritage Program (Threatened & Endangered Species) (#47.4) ❑ Stream Obstruction Approval (#47.5) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (802-479-7561) or District Office 879-2300 Contact: ❑ Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) (#49, 50, 50.1, 50.2) ❑ Storage of flammable liquids, explosives ❑ LP Gas Storage ❑ Hazardous Chemical Use/Tier II Reporting (800-347-0488) ® Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers #50.2) ❑ Boilers and pressure vessels (#50.3) 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: ❑ Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors (#51, 51.1, 52, 53, 53.1) ❑ Program for asbestos control & lead certification (#54, 55, 55.1) ❑ Children's camps []Hot Tub Installation & Inspection — Commercial (#51.1) 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: ❑ Child care facilities (1-800-649-2642 or 802-241-2159) (#57) ❑ Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) (#59) ❑ Nursing Homes (241-2345) (#59) ❑ Assisted Living and Therapeutic Community Residences (241-2345) (#59) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION ❑ Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) (#66) ❑ Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) (#63) ❑ Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) (#61) ❑ Construction within state highway right-of-way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) (#66) Contact: ❑ Junkyards (828-2053) (#62) ❑ Railroad crossings (828-2710) (#64 ❑ Airports and landing strips (828-2833) (#65) ❑ Motor vehicle dealer license (828-2067) (#6j 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800-675-9873 OR 802-828-3429) Contact: ❑ Use/sale of Pesticides (828-3429) (#72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78) ❑Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-3429) (#81) ❑ Milk Processing Facilities (828-3429) #83, 83.1, 85, 87) ❑ Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-3429) (#89, 89.1) ❑ Golf Courses (828-2431) (#71) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431)(#79) ❑ Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) (#88) ❑ Medium and Large Farm Operations (828-2431) ❑ Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-3429) (#75.1, 80, 0 VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 ® VT Building Energy Standards (#47.2) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) ❑ Historic Buildings (#47.1 & 101) ❑ Archeological Sites (#47.1 & 101) 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) ❑ Liquor Licenses (#90) ❑ General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) ❑ Business Registration (#90.1) ❑ Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) (#90.2) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551 & 828-5787) ❑ Income & business taxes (sales, meals/ rooms, etc) (#91, 22, 93, 24, 95,26) 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2070) ❑ Fuel Taxes; Commercial Vehicle (#69-70) CMLOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael St., Ste. 205, Essex Jct., VT 05452 (802) 872-2893 (#97, 98, & 99) 24. OTHER: Sections #3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Date: 8-26-10 1 may be reached at 802-879-5676 Copies have been mailed to: Revised 2/10 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD drb\sub\shalna\shalna 31otFinal.doc #3 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: July 15, 2010 Plans received: June 14, 2010 & July 13, 2010 45 HIGHLAND TERRACE— 3-LOT SUBDIVISION Owner/Applicant Algimantas & Neringa Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston. VT 05495 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-10-22 date: Julv 20, 2010 Contact Person Property Information Gunner McCain Tax Parcel 0850-00045 McCain Consulting Inc SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 93 South Main Street 0.91 acres Waterburv. VT 05676 Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLING L 2 ) DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotFinal Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking sketch plan review to subdivide a 39, 450 sq. ft. parcel into three (3) lots of 13,320 sq. ft. (lot #2A), 13,150 sq. ft. (lot #2B), and 13,070 sq. ft. (lot #2C), Highland Terrace. The sketch plan application was reviewed on October 20, 2009 and November 3, 2009 (minutes attached); the preliminary plat plan was reviewed on June 1, 2010 (draft minutes attached). The final plat was reviewed on July 6, 2010 but continued by the Board so that the applicant could address concerns about the setback of the garage from the building line and the percentage of south -facing windows. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted as dated above and have the following comments. Zoninq District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Neighborhood Residential Zoning District Requirement/Limitation Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 13,070 SF A Max. Density-NR 1.2 units/acre base density (max of 4/acre with TDR) 3.3 units/acre** y` Max. Building Coverage 15% ** Max. Total Coverage 30% ** Min. Front Setback 30 ft. ** Min. Side Setback 10 ft. ** �1 Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. ** A The acreage of the lot will not support a home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. Only one dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of at least two additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). ** The application does not propose to locate actual structures. Actual structures will be sited with respect to setbacks on the lots as part of a zoning permit, within the limitations of the district and within the restrictions of the design criteria imposed by the DRB as a result of this decision. 1. No dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The option for purchase of the development right documents for Lots 2b and 2c must be reviewed and approved by the City Attomey and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to recording the mylar of the final plat plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING )ON 3 � DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 31otFinal 2. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for Lot 2A, the applicant shall record the document entitled, "Density Reduction Easement and Transfer of Development Rights" and a survey of the area from which the transferable development rights have been severed as required under 24 V.S.A § 4423(b)(4), upon approval of the City Attorney in the South Burlington land records. 3_ No development shall occur on Lots 2b and 2c without prior approval by the Development Review Board for residential design. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast Quadrant. 4. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground_ The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Southeast Quadrant District This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district Therefore it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR. 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning District. A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ- NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub- district shall not exceed fifty feet (50); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. 5. The structures shall not exceed the height limitations of the district B. Open Space and Resource Protection. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING �ON 4 ) DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 31otFinal (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels The proposed lots would consume the majority of what is already a small lot. There are very little opportunities for open space on this small lot. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable sub -district allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. The proposed subdivision is in compliance with this criterion with the exception of the density limitations noted above. Additional units may be permitted on the subject lots with the appropriate transfers of development right(s). (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. Again, there are no natural areas or open spaces proposed on this small lot. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 6. Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. There are no wetlands or streams on the subject property. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. This criterion is not applicable to this application. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the CITY OF SOUTH BURLING )ON 5 ) DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shaina\shalna 31otFinal location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. The preliminary plat plans detail the proposed water and sewer connections, which have been reviewed by the City Engineer and Superintendent of the Water Department. Comments are dated May 27, 2010 from Justin Rabidoux, Director of Public Works. 7. The applicant shall comply with the comments of the Director of Public Works, per the memo dated May 27, 2010. Where necessary, the plans shall be changed. (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. Hinesburg Road is included among several corridors on the Official City Map for a proposed recreation path. Several properties along the road have already dedicated easements to the City. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee previously reviewed the plans for the adjacent lot on Hinesburg Road and an easement is now included on that property. Nothing further is necessary for this property. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. The Board discussed the possibility of adding a sidewalk along Highland Terrace as part of this application and delayed a decision on the subject pending input from the Director of Public Works. Staff has spoken with the Director who has stated the following: I looked at Highland Terrace, specifically to see if a sidewalk on the west side from Dubois Drive to the project site would work. There is substantial tree, shrub and undergrowth screening on the west side of Highland that is of significant value to Highland residents. Installing sidewalk would result in the loss of that buffer. That fact, combined with a small 3-unit development proposal that is a minor pedestrian generator, leads me to not recommend making it a condition of the project to install the sidewalk. No additional recreation paths or sidewalks are practicable as part of this application (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING iON 6 > DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shaina 3lotFinal The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated May 26, 2010 (attached). He does not recommend any changes. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. No new roads are proposed. All lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. This criterion is not applicable in this application. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. 9.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. The proposed development is too small to warrant such blocks, and no new roads are proposed. Therefore this criterion is not applicable. (2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 400 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). CITY OF SOUTH BURLING TON 7 ) DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotFinal There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. Therefore this criterion is not applicable. (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. There are no opportunities to connect in a meaningful way to adjacent properties. (4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. The lots meet this criterion. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and 9-9 below. (2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (51) in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4). The applicant is not proposing any on -street parking. Staff does not recommend any on -street parking. (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5). This criterion is not applicable to this application. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING ON 8 ) DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotFinal (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets). The applicant has submitted only one proposed building type for Lot 2a which meets this criterion. There are three lots. The Board discussed this and agreed to review each building lot for design review as they are submitted. The decision herein would only approve the building type for the home on Lot 2a. 8. The applicant shall seek approval from the Development Review Board for buildings on Lots 2b and 2c. (2) Building Fagades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. The applicant has submitted only one proposed building type for Lot 2a which meets this criterion. There are three lots. The Board discussed this and agreed to review each building lot for design review as they are submitted. The decision herein would only approve the building type for the home on Lot 2a. (3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings should be set back fifteen feet (15') from the back of sidewalk. The applicant has submitted only one proposed building type for Lot 2a which meets this criterion. There are three lots. The Board discussed this and agreed to review each building lot for design review as they are submitted. The decision herein would only approve the building type for the home on Lot 2a. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. The applicant has submitted only one proposed building type for Lot 2a which meets this criterion. There are three lots. The Board discussed this and agreed to review each building lot CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 j DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotFinal for design review as they are submitted. The decision herein would only approve the building type for the home on Lot 2a. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. The applicant has submitted only one proposed building type for Lot 2a which meets this criterion. There are three lots. The Board discussed this and agreed to review each building lot for design review as they are submitted. The decision herein would only approve the building type for the home on Lot 2a. (6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing types. Again, the applicant has submitted only one proposed building type for Lot 2a which meets this criterion. There are three lots. The Board discussed this and agreed to review each building lot for design review as they are submitted. Staff recommends that the Board approve Final Plat application #SD-10-22 subject to the conditional items included in this report. Respectfully submitted, Cathyann aRose, A CP, Associate Planner Copy to: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, applicants DEVELOPMENT REVIE vv )BOARD .?a..,.. t 1 JUNE 2010 PAGE 4 where the line will be shown when the LOMA is received. Mr. Dinklage said the Board can proceed as if they were going to make a decision. Mr. Dinklage stressed that any removal of trees which are shown on the plan would have to come back to the DRB. Ms. LaRose noted that the property is not in an area where storm water review is required. She has not been able to speak with the Stormwater Superintendent. Mr. Rabinowitz said he talked with him, and there were no issues. Ms. LaRose said she will get a letter to that effect. Mr. Knudsen asked if there is any blocking of views to the Lake. Mr. Marshall said existing trees screen the house and are higher than the house will be. There are also existing Lake access paths which will not be compromised. Mr. Rabinowitz said the total square footage will be approximately 2500 sq. ft. plus a possible attic and/or basement, for a 3300 sq. ft. potential. Mr. Lipson, who lives at the south end of the road, said the plans are consistent with the neighborhood, and they strongly support the project. He added that what is proposed is better than what is there now. Mr. Twitchell, an adjoining neighbor, said they are "tickled pink" that this is being done. Members of the Board indicated they favored approval when the federal issue is resolved. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Conditional Use Application #CU-10-07 of Kathleen & Thomas Easton until 15 June 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Preliminary Plat Application #SD-10-16 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna to subdivide a 39,450 sq. ft. parcel into three lots of approximately equal size, Highland Terrace: Mr. Knudsen stepped down during this application due to a conflict of interest. Mr. McCain showed the proposed layout with proposed house footprints. There would be similar houses on all 3 lots. One of the houses would be occupied by the Shalna's daughter and her husband. Mr. Dinklage noted that this review does not include approval for the houses. Mr. McCain said water would be on -site because it is cost prohibitive to bring in city water because of the elevation. The proposed hydrant has been okayed by the Fire Chief. Ms. LaRose said the Water Department is OK with this. Mr. McCain added there will also be "rain gardens." The applicant is requesting that TDR's not be required to be purchased before the filing of the DEVELOPMENT REVIE )BOARD 1 JUNE 2010 PAGE 5 mylar. Mr. Belair said that is up to the Board, but it is possible that an option to purchase would suffice. Mr. McCain said they would have no problem with that. Mr. Dinklage asked whether there would be a sidewalk. Mr. Stuono felt there should be. Mr. Belair suggested speaking with the Public Works director as there are topography issues. Members felt the homes should conform to the SEQ guidelines. Mr. Shalna said 50 homes down the road have garages in front. Ms. LaRose said they were built under the older regulations. Mr. Dinkalge stressed that the applicant gets additional houses because of those new regulations. The applicant felt no one would want a house with a one -car garage with this kind of house. Mr. Stuono said that with dense neighborhoods, design is very important. Mr. Wessel noted that the hydrant is proposed on the southwest corner of their lot. He said water pressure there is not adequate. He felt the city needs to put in money to get adequate water pressure. This would be, in his opinion, a better solution than drilling 3 wells. Mr. Dinklage said that is an issue for the City Council. Mr. Wessel asked who would maintain the rain gardens. Mr. McCain said homeowners would, as the gardens will be right in front of their homes. Mr. Dinklage asked if the city has authority to make sure these work as they should. Mr. Belair said this is difficult with single family dwellings as the city doesn't get grading plans and that level of detail. Mr. Dinklage suggested this be taken to the appropriate body to get "teeth" into the regulations so problems get fixed if they develop. Ms. Kruger felt a sidewalk was important as are street lights. Mr. Dinklage said that is a city issue. Mr. Kruger felt the plan was ridiculous for the neighborhood as these lots can't compare in any way to the existing character of the neighborhood. The approval motion was amended to indicate that an option for the TDR's be secured before the mylar. The purchase of the TDR's must be recorded before the building of houses 2 and 3. The Board indicated its desire for sidewalks, if that is deemed feasible by the Public Works Director. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-10-16 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Conditional Use Application #CU-10-66 of Margaret Novotny to amend a previously approved plan for a 9,800 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting 4,410 sq. ft. to social services use, 72 Ethan Allen Drive: and 9. Site Plan Application #SP-10-34 of Margaret Novotny to amend a previously approved plan for a 9,800 sq. ft. building used for general office use. The amendment consists of converting 4,410 sq. ft. to social services use, 72 Ethan Allen Drive: J f ?� N 54� oo M` 41 11 t I ♦� ..rrwwwwa.wr ,. 0 4. None �•Y.� .. . I � ' � 71MN.M1 "+J .,... art. M1, � / t I � ,'`"r. •. W � -� ,1` UIL7.11J� MEtxA ` R OPEN V- m Page 1 of 1 http://www.houseplans.net/uploads/floorplanelevations/full-15790.jpg 6/14/2010 Page 1 of 1 http://www.houseplans.net/uploads/floorplanelevations/full-15791.jpg 6/14/2010 -5- 10' wide utility easement per 34/324 1" IF, flush, no cap . I 850-00045 I LU Thaddeus McDougal & I ;� I C-'1 Jamie Fratamico 831 /38 M I L' o Ln I Z Shed I I. I w O cy r'-) LO I 0 )/8" IRF, 11" reveal, S 87'43'23" E bent & loose, no cap Parcel 2A--------------------� o I 49 Highland Terrace ► J`^ I _ _ 13,230 sq. ft. I Ir ls.sf A!t L — — _ — — — —Building enveloQe— — — — — 11.1't N o N 87'27'53" W 11.0'f 249.32 ------------------ — Parcel 2B 11.1 tp v � Ou 2 �� ' 47 Highland Terrace VHo Hedge Row �2 1 I 13, 150 sq. ft. L — _ — — — Buildin envelo e— — — — — _11_1't E S 87'11'59" E — — 11.0'f 24" Ash 247.95 -- —I Parcel 2C 45 Highland Terrace 15" Maple 11.1't <:- U7 Z 13,070 sq.ft. ► IIcli 19.5'f 1r,] I IL -- — (6) 12" Red Pine Row — — — — — — —Building enveloRe— — — o ---- - — —J '— — N 86'57'15" W 1" IPF, 4" reveal, 246.59 -- no cap 1-3/" IPF, 12" reveal, no cap 0) O -t] 0 Z3 O YELLOW VINYL CLAPBOAF SIDING 4" TO WEATHER W D WHITE DOOR WHITE GARAGE DOOR ALGIMANTAS SHALNA LOT 2A PROPOSED HOUSE GRAY ASPHALT SHINGLES ON ALL ROOF TOPS -1ITE TRIM I c C. co 11 No Text No Text 45' 4' ALGIMANTAS SHALNA LOT 2A PROPOSED HOUSE FOOT PRINT 33' k OPEN TO 7- --- 0:-'L0Y1 .. IM n ci 0 rn co 00 91 i w M4wwM11AMw^ wY M�A�V wy�YwM '4 1 w x Olt 44 *V) p 45' I 4' I I 8' 19' ALGIMANTAS SHALNA LOT 2A PROPOSED HOUSE FOOT PRINT 33' Page 1 of 1 http://www.houseplans.net/uploads/floorplanelevations/full-15791.jpg 6/14/2010 Page 1 of 1 http://www.houseplans.net/uploads/floorplanelevations/full-15790.jpg 6/14/2010 YELLOW VINYL CLAPBOAF SIDING 4" TO WEATHER WI, p WHITE DOOR WHITE GARAGE DOOR ALGIMANTAS SHALNA LOT 2A PROPOSED HOUSE GRAY ASPHALT SHINGLES ON ALL ROOF TOPS ITE TRIM McCain Consulting, Inc. Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting June 14, 2010 Justin Rabidoux, Director South Burlington Department of Public Works 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: #SD-10-16, Algimantas Shalna — Highland Terrace McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Justin, As per your review comments dated May 27, 2010 and our subsequent phone conversations, enclosed please find revised plans for the project. Your comments are addressed/answered as follows: 1. The jurisdictional threshold for the State's Operational Stormwater Permit is not met as there is less than 1 acre of impervious surface. 2. The Stormwater Easement noted on the plans is a private easement for the homeowners as the bio-retention areas straddle the property lines. There is no expectation that the city will provide the maintenance. 3. The bio-retention areas have been re -designed to daylight to the road ditch. See Sheet SW-1 4. The pipe bend has been eliminated. See Sheet SW -I. 5. The Vermont Stormwater Manual was the basis of design for the bio-retention areas. 6. As per the note on Sheet SW-1, the grass channels will be used to direct runoff to the bio-retention areas. 7. The bio -retention daylight pipe size and material are noted on Sheet SW-1. 8. 18" driveway culverts have been specified for the curb cuts. See Sheets S-1 and SW-1. 9. The erosion control matting is not shown on the plan as the standard detail used specifies matting on slopes over 5%, and the slopes on this site are all less than 5%. 10. It is anticipated that the driveways will be paved. 11. The relationship between the pond outlets and crests are shown on the plans. See Sheet SW-1. 12. Contour elevations are shown. Benchmarks have been added to Sheet S-1. 13. Footing drains will not be utilized as there is nowhere to daylight the pipe. Sumppumps will be used if full foundations are constructed. Y:\Projects\26's\26103\2009\Town\JRabidoux Letter 6-14-10.doc 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 • Waterbury, VT 05676 • (802) 244-5093 Tel • (802) 244-7492 Fax Y`S Justin Rabidoux June14,2010 p.2 14. Notes that a permit from the Department of Public Works is required for all work within the street right-of-way have been added to the plans. See Sheets S-1 and SW-1. 15. It is anticipated that pavement excavation will not be necessary to install the sewer line and manholes. The line has been shifted slightly to the west to ensure that this can be done. 16. Note 2.2.A on Sheet SW-1 has been edited per your request. 17. The manhole cover diameter has been revised. See Sheet S-3. 18. The standard trench detail has been clarified. See Sheet S-3. 19. The sewer line/underdrain trench detail has been revised to have the sewer line on a trench shelf 18" above the underdrain from stations 0+00 to 6+00. The underdrain ends at 6+00, and has a solid pipe continuing to the existing storm drain at station 8+45 20. The manhole detail, showing a poured trough and specifying rim and invert elevations for the 4 proposed manholes is shown on Sheet S-3. 21. The stormdrain daylights to the east, on property owned by Bill Wessel, and is depicted on Sheet S-2. I believe this addresses all of your comments. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, McCain Consulting, Inc. Gunner McCain Enc. Cc: Algimantas Shalna, w/ enclosures Y:\Projects\26's\26103\2009\Town\JRabidou Letter6-14-10.doc CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: June 28, 2010 drb\sub\shalna\shalna_3lotPrelim.doc Plans received: June 14, 2010 da #6 45 HIGHLAND TERRACE— 3-LOT SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-10-22 Meetina date: July 6. 2010 Owner/Applicant Algimantas & Neringa Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Contact Person Property Information Gunner McCain Tax Parcel 0850-00045 McCain Consulting Inc SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 93 South Main Street 0.91 acres Waterbury, VT 05676 Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotFinal PROJECT DESCRIPTION Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking sketch plan review to subdivide a 39, 450 sq. ft. parcel into three (3) lots of 13,320 sq. ft. (lot #2A), 13,150 sq. ft. (lot #2B), and 13,070 sq. ft. (lot #2C), Highland Terrace. The sketch plan application was reviewed on October 20, 2009 and November 3, 2009 (minutes attached); the preliminary plat plan was reviewed on June 1, 2010 (draft minutes attached). Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on April 30, 2010 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Neighborhood Residential Zoning District_ Requirement/Limitation Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 13,070 SF Max. Density-NR 1.2 units/acre base density max of 4/acre with TDR 3.3 units/acre** �l Max. Building Coverage 15% ** Max. Total Coverage 30% ** Min. Front Setback 30 ft. ** Min. Side Setback 10 ft. ** Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. ** 4 The acreage of the lot will not support a home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. Only one dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of at least two additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). ** The application does not propose to locate actual structures. Actual structures will be sited with respect to setbacks on the lots as part of a zoning permit, within the limitations of the district and within the restrictions of the design criteria imposed by the DRB as a result of this decision. 1. Only one dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of at least two additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The purchase of the development right documents must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to recording the mylar. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 31otFinal The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast Quadrant. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Southeast Quadrant District This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district Therefore it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR. 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning District. A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ- NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub- district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. 3. The structures shall not exceed the height limitations of the district. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels The proposed lots would consume the majority of what is already a small lot. There are very little opportunities for open space on this small lot. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable sub -district allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. The proposed subdivision is in compliance with this criterion with the exception of the density limitations noted above. Additional units may be permitted on the subject lots with the appropriate transfers of development right(s). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sublshalna\shalna 3lotFinal (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. Again, there are no natural areas or open spaces proposed on this small lot. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 4. Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. There are no wetlands or streams on the subject property. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. This criterion is not applicable to this application. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. The preliminary plat plans detail the proposed water and sewer connections, which have been reviewed by the City Engineer and Superintendent of the Water Department. Comments are dated May 27, 2010 from Justin Rabidoux, Director of Public Works. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sublshalna\shalna NotFinal 5. The applicant shall comply with the comments of the Director of Public Works, per the memo dated May 27, 2010. Where necessary, the plans shall be changed. (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. Hinesburg Road is included among several corridors on the Official City Map for a proposed recreation path. Several properties along the road have already dedicated easements to the City. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee previously reviewed the plans for the adjacent lot on Hinesburg Road and an easement is now included on that property. Nothing further is necessary for this property. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. The Board discussed the possibility of adding a sidewalk along Highland Terrace as part of this application and delayed a decision on the subject pending input from the Director of Public Works. Staff has spoken with the Director who has stated the following: I looked at Highland Terrace, specifically to see if a sidewalk on the west side from Dubois Drive to the project site would work. There is substantial tree, shrub and undergrowth screening on the west side of Highland that is of significant value to Highland residents. Installing sidewalk would result in the loss of that buffer. That fact, combined with a small 3-unit development proposal that is a minor pedestrian generator, leads me to not recommend making it a condition of the project to install the sidewalk. No additional recreation paths or sidewalks are practicable as part of this application (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated May 26, 2010 (attached). He does not recommend any changes. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. No new roads are proposed. All lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotFinal (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. This criterion is not applicable in this application. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. 9.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District• Specific Standards The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. The proposed development is too small to warrant such blocks, and no new roads are proposed. Therefore this criterion is not applicable. (2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 400 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. Therefore this criterion is not applicable. (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. There are no opportunities to connect in a meaningful way to adjacent properties. (4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING TON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 31otFinal The lots meet this criterion. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and 9-9 below. (2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4) The applicant is not proposing any on -street parking. Staff does not recommend any on -street parking. (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5). This criterion is not applicable to this application. (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. C. Residential Design CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 31otFinal (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets). The applicant has submitted a proposed building type but has not included its orientation on the site plan. As such, this criterion should be made a condition of approval. The buildings must bear a close relationship to Highland Terrace, and shall face the street. 6. The houses shall be located within the proposed building envelopes and shall face Highland Terrace. (2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. The applicant has submitted only one proposed building type. There are three lots. This does not appear to meet the criteria established herein. The Board should discuss this. 7. The applicant shall submit a variety of proposed building types for review by the Development Review Board prior to final plat approval. (3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings should be set back fifteen feet (15') from the back of sidewalk. There are no sidewalks proposed in the development, but the building envelopes are proposed to the fronts of the lots. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. The applicant has submitted a proposed building type (attached). Again, the applicant should address this with the Board at the hearing. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. The applicant has submitted a proposed building type which does not meet this criterion. Staff would not support a waiver of this criterion. The garages must either be set back from the front of the home by a minimum of eight feet, or should be side -loaded. 8. Garages must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. The plans and submitted building elevations shall reflect this prior to final plat approval. (6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotFinal within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing types. Again, this criterion does not appear to be met based on the single building type submitted by the applicant. Staff recommends that the Board discuss the issues of residential design criteria. There are several pieces of the building design criterion which do not appear to be met. Staff does not recommend any waivers of these design criteria. The Board should continue the application until the applicant submits additional information which will comply with all aspects of the SEQ design criteria. Resy(egtfully submitted, hyann XaRose, AICP, Associate Planner Copy to: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, applicants LEGEND QTP-I Traverse point 0 IPF Iron pipe found @ IRF Iron rod found Tree Latitude/Longitude point x Barbed wire fence 100 10 contours 2' contours Tree line — — Property line — Right of way line > Ditch/droinage Swale pV Water line — — — — — — — — — Building envelope 91't Douglas & Elaine Moynes 0850.00009 i I MAILBOX I GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 so ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 R Topography by Total Station Contour Interval 2' Assumed Datum I I THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE REOUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA SEC. 1403 FOR THE FILING OF SURVEY PLATS. Y: \Cadd'\26000's\26103\dwg\26103 08-31-09.dwg RECEIVED SEP 13 2C�9 City of So. Budington DESIGNED BY: GNM PROJECT: #26103 CONSUL ANT: DRAWN BY: SJH/RHP/WDB GUNNER fCCAIN CHECKED BY GNM LD-B 37 CPESC A?646 CESSNI 0177 DATE: AUGUST 31, 2009 i I I John & Patricia Trutor 0650-00040 I I I I I SHEET I OF I DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 NOVEMBER 2009 PAGE 2 subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-09 of Joe Larkin to alter the existing grade by adding 800 cubic yards of fill, 23 Pinnacle Drive: Mr. Larkin showed the area where fill will go. He said he had talked with neighbors regarding plantings and drainage concerns. He indicated they will use contours so water will flow away from the house. Mr. Donahue noted that even if the DRB approves this, the Pinnacle Board can deny it. He said the Board is concerned with remaining views of the lake from Pinnacle and wants to keep the view corridor open. Mr. Belair noted that no landscaping is allowed to grow higher than the house. Mr. Donahue noted there are sometimes covenants which are more restrictive than city regulations. He felt there should be a way to coordinate this, possibly asking the applicants if they are aware of any covenants. Mr. Knudsen said the DRB cannot deny an application because it conflicts with private covenants. Mr. Bresee referred to the Spear St. corridor study and suggested the applicant consider that if a berm is to be built. Mr. Belair said they are 35 feet from city property, so there are no city issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-09 of Joe Larkin subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-45 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna to subdivide a 39,475 sq. ft. parcel into three lots of 13,938 sq. ft. (lot 2A), 12,746 sq. ft. (Lot 2B), and 12, 746 sq. ft. (Lot 2C), 45 Highland Terrace: Mr. Behr noted that the DRB met with the Planning Commission regarding issues in the City. The Planning Commission was very clear about having applicants adhere to design standards in a district relating to density, etc. He noted that lot 2A is not in compliance with the district regulations as it is being presented. The applicant showed an alternate plan that does conform. He said it is actually cheaper to build. Staff was OK with the applicant going forward. 6. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three -level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked to continue the application until 17 ' Interested Persons Record and Service List sou...:.. Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain - administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the. DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.SS..AA.. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE; V0• W y PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING AnnRFsc DDn I�rr n� IhlTrnrcT F�VWD 60-4 9-11 = - 1 Lr;�� Z1 CY`�-' we-- _�. %J1 IIY 1 Crx L:01 Gcj�- -64kll tj/V-eS (G CrAOL , Cr,eCL-C /;;• (l✓U�n�� R IVY q 3 � Mom; � s-t w�h� o��� i� t ce)< `CG rdP. CO, Cu d a 'f N1 ( � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD drb\sub\shalna\shalna_3lots ketch. doc enda #5 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: October 26, 2009 Plans received: September 23, 2009 45 HIGHLAND TERRACE— 3-LOT SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-09-45 Meetina date: November 3. 2009 Owner/Applicant Algimantas & Neringa Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Contact Person Property Information Gunner McCain Tax Parcel 0850-00045 McCain Consulting Inc SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 93 South Main Street 0.91 acres Waterburv, VT 05676 Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotsketch Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking sketch plan review to subdivide a 39, 475 sq. ft. parcel into three (3) lots of 13,983 sq. ft. (lot 2A), 12,746 sq. ft. (lot 2) and 12,746 sq. ft. (lot 2C), 45 Highland Terrace. The application was reviewed on October 20, 2009 and continued until November 3, 2009. Minutes are not yet available. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on September 23, 2009 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Neighborhood Residential Zoning District Requirement/Limitation Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 12,746 SF 4 Max. Density-NR 1.2 units/acre base density max of 4/acre with TDR 3.3 units/acre** �l Max. Building Coverage 15% ** �l Max. Total Coverage 30% ** �l Min. Front Setback 30 ft. ** Min. Side Setback 10 ft. ** �l Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. ** + The acreage of the lot will not support a home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. Only one dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of at least two additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). ** The application does not propose actual structures. Actual structures will be sited on the lots as part of a zoning permit. This application seeks only to create the lots and general layout for the dwelling units. The concept plan remains within the coverage limitations of the district. 1. Only one dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of at least two additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The purchase of the development right documents must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to recording the mylar. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sublshalna\shalna 3lotsketch Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast Quadrant. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Southeast Quadrant District This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district Therefore it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning District. A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ- NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub- district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. 3. The structures shall not exceed the height limitations of the district. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels The proposed lots would consume the majority of what is already a small lot. There are very little opportunities for open space on this small lot. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable subdistrict allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. The proposed subdivision is in compliance with this criterion with the exception of the density limitations noted above. Additional units may be permitted on the subject lots with the appropriate transfers of development right(s). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sublshalnalshalna 3lotsketch (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. Again, there are no natural areas or open spaces proposed on this small lot. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. in making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 4. Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. There are no wetlands or streams on the subject property. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. This criterion is not applicable to this application. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. The preliminary plat plans shall detail the proposed water and sewer connections, which shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and Superintendent of the Water Department. 5. The preliminary plat plans shall detail the proposed water and sewer connections, which shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and Superintendent of the Water Department. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drblsub\shaina\shalna 3lotsketch (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. Hinesburg Road is included among several corridors on the Official City Map for a proposed recreation path. Several properties along the road have already dedicated easements to the City. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee previously reviewed the plans for the adjacent lot on Hinesburg Road and an easement is now included on that property. Nothing further is necessary for this property. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. No additional recreation paths or sidewalks are necessary as part of this application. (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. The Fire Chief shall review the plans. It is likely that he will recommend fitting the homes on the private road with sprinklers. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. Staff finds no need to design the road so as to serve adjacent properties. (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. The private road which is proposed is sufficiently sized to serve the subject property. As stated, there is no need to serve adjacent properties as part of this application. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. The private road shall be designed to the specifications included in the Land Development Regulations. The applicant is proposing a 12 foot wide private road. The standards for private roads in the Land Development Regulations require a 20 foot wide private road. The Board should discuss the applicant's request for a waiver of the required road width. The Fire Chief has consistently called for at least 18 feet in width based on the setup of his response vehicles. The Board has been consistent in the past in requiring at least 18 feet in road width. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drblsub\shalnalshalna 3lotsketch 6. The Board should discuss the applicant's request of a waiver of the required private road width. Furthermore, the applicant shall submit profiles of the road which shall be reviewed by the City Engineer prior to preliminary plat approval. 7. The preliminary plat application shall include engineer's drawings of the proposed road profiles. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. This criterion is not applicable in this application 9_.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District• Specific Standards The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. The proposed development is too small to warrant such blocks. Staff recommends a waiver of this criterion. (2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 400 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). The proposed access will be considered a private street as it accesses three dwelling units. However, it functions largely as a shared driveway. It is less than 200 feet in length and terminates in the driveway of parcel 2A. No additional changes are necessary with respect to these criteria. (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. There are no opportunities to connect in a meaningful way to adjacent properties. (4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. Lots 2B and 2C meet this criterion in all aspects as viewed from Highland Terrace. Lot 2A, which does not have any frontage on Highland Terrace, does not meet this criterion. The Board should discuss this issue. In considering this issue, the Board should weigh the importance of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalnalshalna 3lotsketch design elements and neighborhood planning with what may be argued as efficient use of land. The Board has the options to require all lots to meet this criterion, which would require all three lots to front on Highland Terrace, or to only permit Lots 2B and 2C to best be in compliance with the goals and plans of the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. 8. The Board should discuss the applicant's requested waiver of the lot length -width ratio for Lot 2A. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and 9-9 below. (2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose. The applicant is not proposing any sidewalks along the private road or along Highland Terrace. The Board should discuss any need for these. 9. The Board should discuss the potential need for sidewalks within or adjacent to the proposed development. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. (4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4) The applicant is not proposing any on -street parking. Staff does not recommend any on -street parking. (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5). This criterion is not applicable to this application. (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotsketch The City Engineer should address whether any street lights are warranted as part of this application. 10. The City Engineer should consider whether any street lights are warranted as part of this application. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets). Based on the plans submitted, the proposal does not meet this criterion. The buildings front towards the private drive/driveways. They bear little to no relationship to Highland Terrace, sharing only their side facade with the street. The rear building technically faces Highland Terrace, but sits so far back and behind two other buildings and via a lengthy enough private road that it bears little relationship to the street. Staff does not find that these criteria are being met. (2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed dwelling units (3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings should be set back fifteen feet (15') from the back of sidewalk. As staff has already stated, this standard is not being met. The buildings do not front on the road at all and no sidewalks are provided. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. It is unclear if porches, stoops, or balconies are proposed. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. This does not appear to be met on all of the buildings. (6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing types. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotsketch There are several pieces of the SEQ design criteria which do not appear to be met as part of this proposal. The Board should discuss whether they wish to enforce the SEQ design criteria, in part or in whole, on this application. 11. The Board shall discuss whether they wish to enforce the SEQ residential design criteria on the proposed subdivision. At issue are the width to length ratio of the lots, orientation of the units, proximity of the units to the roadway, and location of garages. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items before proceeding to the preliminary plat level of review. Respectfully submitted, ix"pofp"'44k- dathyariA LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, applicants 0860-01440 Judith Lavonwoy 297/442-443 I v. .o 1" IPF flush I no cop �¢" IRF 11" reveal 3 bent & loose '` = x� S_8T43'2t" E no cap i w 250.70' w _ 10' wide utility easement per I 1. (— _____— — — — - 34/324 Parcel 2A j 3 13,230 sq.ft. rBL — — — — Building enveI%e— — _ — _ 249.32 W Thaddeus McDougal& 1}1. I----------------_L Jamie Frotamico I I M IM I I QI� MdgeZRroPee*'30 Parcel 2B1 13,150 sq. ft. ¢ Flo ❑ I Shed ol� I — — — — — -_Building envelope— _ 6 I S 87'11'59" E I N I 24 Ash 247.95 w Parcel 2C 13,070 s r - - - ----------- L 1p�N q'ft I 15" Maple z (6) 12" Red Pine Row v I — — — ——fluilding enveloee_ — , I N -- �N 86'57'15" W_ — — — J 1" IPF 4" reveal 246.59 — —" --- --_ _ no cap lYa" IPF 1" reveal no cap I 0850-00009 I Douglas & Elaine Moynes 392/578-579 LEGEND Nt" Iron rod to be set with cap marked "VAN IDERSTINE 719" QIron pipe found OO Iron rod found 0 Calculated point Utility pole — — Property line — Right-ol-Way line — — — — — — — Easement line Wooden fence - x - Barbed wire fence line Overhead utility wires Tree line 36/792 Book 36 Page 792 of the Land Records GRAPHIC SCALE a 0 15 a ( 1N FEET ) I inch = 30 ft.. SOUTH BURLI'IGTON,}iVT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE Received for record`��Oj R A.D. 20_ at _ oclocFI1V ALinutes _m. and recordedH-ice N Attest: Town Clerk r FOR FINAL I I I I I i 0850-00040 John & Patricia Trutor City o f ' Z010 So evr/i'7 O/j TITLE SOURCE: South Burlington Land Records Warranty deed of Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller to Algimantas Shalna and Neringo Shoina, Book 754, Page 310-311, Dated 30 June, 2006. REFERENCES: 1) A plat entitled "Survey of the Lands of Algimantas & Neringo Sholno, South Burlington, Vermont, scale 1" = 40'; by McCain Consulting, Inc., dated January 8, 2008, revised April 8, 2008, obtained from McCain Consulting, Inc. and recorded in Map Slide ??? of the South Burlington Lands Records. 2) A plan entitled "Tract Plan - Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont, Property of Christian B. Hoskam Jr. & Hazel G. Hoskan," scale 1" = 100', dated June 17, 1957, recorded Mop Slide 19.5 of the South Burlington Land Records. 3) A plan entitled "Plan of Land belonging to C.B. Hoskam, South Burlington, Vt," scale 1" = 40', by Janes R. Ogden, dated July 26. 1969, recorded Map Slides 93 and 93.1 of the South Burlington Land Records. 4) Protective covenants in re: Country Garden Development, dated June 19, 1957, recorded Book 34, Page 324 of the of the South Burlington Land Records. NOTES: 1) This mop is based on the research of the South Burlington Land Records, physical evidence found and a total station traverse with a minimum precision ratio that meets the standards for urban surveys, set by the Vermont State Board of Land Surveyors Rules effective October 11, 1999. performed by Keith R. Van Iderstine and Scott A. Hozle in March, 2007. 2) Parcels 2A, 2B and 2C may have rights to water as described in a warranty deed of Roland E. Peterson, doing business as Peterson Construction Company, to Helen Puffer as well as rights to water as described in a water rights agreement from Merril and Hilda Cove to Helen S. Puffer, Dated October 31, 1957 and recorded in Book 34, Page 38 of the South Burlington Land Records. 4) Except where otherwise noted, no attempt was made to identify and/or locate any easements or rights -of -way that may exist, either recorded or unrecorded. The Highland Terrace (Town Highway 1146) right-of-way is listed as sixty (60) feet wide in the South Burlington Road Index. 5. This subdivision is subject to the provisions of the following permits: Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit PENDING. Town Subdivision Permit PENDING. 6. The slormwater pond easements depicted herein are for access, inspection and maintenance of said ponds. 7) Bearings are based on Magnetic North, as observed by McCain Consulting, Inc., in March, 2007. 8) Research by Keith R. Van Iderstine. Mop by Scott J. Herring SURVEY AND SUBDIVISION OF THE LANDS OF ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA Highland Terrace South Burlington, Vermont HEARING SCALE C = 30' ` McCAIN CONSULTING, INC. PROJECT : 3 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET DRAWING: 26103sv6103sv 6-10-10.DWC Keith R. Van Iderstine; L.S. 719 WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 DATE: June 10, 2010 SHEET 1 OF l SHEET INDEX S-1 SITE PLAN S-2 SEWER LINE PROFILE S-3 WATER/WASTEWATER SPECIFICATIONS At DETAILS SW-1 STORMWATER OVERVIEW THERE ARE NO KNOWN PSoC'S IN� 4" PERFORATED PVC DRAIN it THE WELL SHIELD 8" SDR 35 PVC SEWER LINE (SEE SEWER TRENCH WITH WIDER NI DRAIN PIPE DETAIL SHEET S-3) I I I T ATCH LINE I S-2 S1 INSTA STONE AND PIPE DRAIN $ ALONG SEWER UNE TO 1 z NOSE: CE STING DRAIN ALONG SHEETS S-1 k S°2 ARE ylEll 5ME10 HI 0 RACE MAILBOX NOT THE SAME SCALE _ - 4IRF I A Judithay I LEGEND OB60-0144001440 - � J , ,TP-1 Troverse point PROPOSED (0 IPF Iran pipe found "��� 18' HDPE CULVERT Q RF Iron rod found IPF 1 ✓✓✓ ARK I AT DRIVEWAY , Tree — K P.E. 1C AEL 2A D PROPOSED HOUSE DRIVEWAY I CUM CUT , ® Monhde _ sa-7 13,230 SQ. FT. PROPOSED SB- LI�LaA�CC I I DMANHOLEi K Barbed .me fence DRILLED WELL 100 10 contours TP-2 contours PA CEL 1 w Jahn k Polr Tee Ile c _ 4° SDR 35 PVC ria Truta I �• - - Pro line 31,1 0 SQ.FT. =49•} .�...,�" ' SEWER LINES Q 0850-ODD40 NOTE: —y Right of woy line 1 GARDEN � _ 0 -yc^" , TP-3 CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BEFORE YOU qG' I > Ditch/dainoge Swale 1 _ �� 18° (DIG -SAFE) AND VERIFY THE LOCATION OF —W Water line - - PA L 2B PROPOSED I I ORCULVERT IVEWAY ALL UTIUTES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Building envelope GARDEN 150 SQ. FT. �; P.E I DRIVEWAY B CUT 4" Cleanout WATER LINE NOTE - - -�'\ - _ - pipe drain " AP 8" PPLE Thaddeus-MED ugd dt I gw- PROPOSED a (�3 w'�w I �.. 11ED WELL �wJ _ --_. A PERMIT IS I BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC RED FROM THE UWORKS — 5 Sewer line Jamb Fratamko 0880-014 I \ — _ ---- I FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE HIGHLAND TERRACE RIGHT-OF-WAY. HEDG ROW Culvert headwall \ GAAD w _ 2461 _ � 15" MAPLE _ � _ 5" A _ --- I �\ E%ISTING ,�°� w _ _ I J� /A` I D HOUSE EENHOUSE _'��. _� B-4 PARCEL 2C r _ SB-5 P DRIVEWAY .i 18' �1 T I'pA ,Y , 4 24" ASH ,� 13,070 SQ.FT. �o 5" APPLE , DRIVEWAY RECUT A' I 18" RED Pt Td 1 PROPCSED �f ^ J - SB-3 I ORILlED TWLL� --- ii Q w. 8v 54NG -p _ �NOA lµ WD1 SWNE 3—"- ,IPF%ngf/s^ GONV WATERZ6! GROOM AT IPF a 1 SEA\EN (6) 12" RED PINE ROW -�� 6d IWDE RIGHT-OF-WAY AIN W 457.0 1 —�� SEPTIC TANK _ Location Ma -- D.Oaa & Elaine Mathes ti'r18 0850-00009 I svEn ar THERE ARE NO KNOWN PSoC'S IN THE WELL SHIELD GRAPHIC SCALE en ( IN PELT) I inch a 20 11, Topography by Total Station Contour Interval 2' Assumed Datum THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, COMPONENT LOCATIONS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF SITE WORT( AND SMALL NOTIFY MCCAIN CONSULTING OF ANY ISSUES OR DISCREPANCIES THAT ARISE FROM THAT REVIEW. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY THIS PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA SEC. 1403 FOR THE FILM OF SURVEY PLATS. Y:\Cadd\26000'sY: \26103',dwg\26103 05-05-10.d.g\26103 05-05-10.d.g l BENCHMARK TOP OF STORM DRAIN aTT ELEVATION 0 4328' GAS METER r ON SIDE OF r 1 I I I Il o HOUSE ee I I I (I END HEDGE ROWSTORM PROPOSED�MANHOLE 4 ®F DAN INSTALL STONE AND PIPE DRAIN ALONG _ �� — —STORM BM \ SIDE SEWER LINE TO REPLACE EXISTING GRAIN ALONG HIGHLAND TERRACE —Sy UN — �� S— — — PROPOSED MANHOLE_ ��-- EXISTING 11 ANHOLE PROPOSED DRIVEWpVNY W �— — — EXISTING 8" OI---- ; STORM THRUST BLOCK It WATER MAIN DRAINS PROPOSED MANHOLE 2 _ _ — — — IN11 �WADISCING IRF — HIGHLAND IERRACE VC EXISTING SEWER LINE STUB TER MAIN PROPOSED CUB FROM WESSEL RESIDENCE EXISTING _� VAULT STOP rn DEPTH UNKNOWN TO DAYLIGHT PROPOSED MANHOLE 1 DRIVEWAY _ —�� CAP THRUST BLOCK,END OF EXISTING B" AND h" CUB STOP AS PER PROPOSED HYDRANT AMETER WATER LINE WIN 1P-3 I IU I t �---. / PLAN BY RICHARD A LAYER, P.E. TITLED 'WATER NOTE: ELECTRICAL VAULT MAIN EXTENSION, HIGHLAND TERRACE, SOUTH EXISTING BLRUNGTON VT.' CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT WORE YOU DIG'—�' — NOTE: DRIVEWAY DATED 12/4/85. (UG-SAFE) AND VERIFY THE LOCATION OF SHEETS S-1 h S-2 ARE S-I 5-2 LOCATION NOT VERIFIED BY MCCAIN CONSULTING. ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. N07 THE SAME SCALE SW-1 450 LEGEND R5 QTP-I Traverse point OIPF Iron pipe found @ IRF Iron rod found M V Water shut aft vain Concrete monument Q Sewer manhole ❑ Storm drain 435 Water shut off vofve Hydrant too 10' contours 2' contours 430 Tree line Property line — Right of way In, > Ditch/drainage wale 425 — 5 Sewer line — — — — — — — — — Stone k pipe train 420 4' ON CLEAN PIPE IN T AIN D MAN llfiil — — PROPOSED M HOLE 2IN IC ON LEAN PE DR T Y.L-MIE AND IRE OR IN IN BOTTOM EXIS OF ING DRU RENCH IN ALON 0 REPLACE HIGHU AIDW DRAT I TO BE 18' BE DW SE TO \ \ '" D MAN IDLE 3 12' OL IUET41---5 E1ISTI ITORNI D% ECT STING S[ORM AIN OR RITO MNJost JPROPOED OIE 4 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch — 50 tl Topography 6y Total Station Contour Internal 2' Assumed Datum. /� ,(,-C A 4 `IIJAV I � EQ Of o evn��9t4� EXISTING MANHOLE 15 8' PIPE TO EXTEND 3' INTO MANHOLE 10 DIISTING MANHOLE INVERT 8 5 R 0 SEWER LINE PROFILE 0 50 100 150 HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" = 50' HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" = 50 VERTICAL SCALE 1" = 5' r.uu a mm VERTICAL SCALE 1" = 5' REVISIONS I.D GAL 4.0 TESTING 1.1 Wok to tre DO- A Furnish and nsld upponmately 1028 feel of 8 inch SDR 35 PVC sewer line. 4.1 Testing Buried Non -Pressure Pipe EDGE OF PAVEMENT B. Furnish and insld four (4) concrete manholes to grade. A. General: C. Locale all underground utilities and structures necessary to do the wok. I. Tests shill be conducted by, and at the expense of, the Contractor under direction of the Engineer. 2'E D. Notify the Engineer in advance whenever an existing pipeline conflicts with the proposed locations Tests shall be continued until all leaks have been made tight to the satisfaction of the Engineer. EDGE OF PAVEMENT of the work. 2. Conduct tests after trench is backlilled. DEPTH AS PER RAN. E. Perform all necessary tests to show satisfactory installation of the project components. B. Gravity Lines: ILAR 4 1/2 FOOT komw COARSE GRANULAR h PPE.DIAMENR Perform project startup. I. Infiltration - Test the lines for infiltration by measuring the Now in the completed line. Measuring COARSEDIS DAp61LL � C � COARSE GRANULAR instruments and labor shall be 4 SDOD PVt To BACKRIL provided by the Contractor. No inflholion shall be acceptable. If any 'pint 4' TOED GraRM DRAW 1.2 Submittals Required shows leakage it shall be rowed. asuunm BE SOR 35 Pvc If' rxarwm STORE 1S PIPE DIANETFF A. The con(reckor shelf submit a complete cons(ruclion schedule which will include the star( and finish 2. Exfllimpicn - Test the lines for exlAtmtion by hydrostatic m and lest. The hydrostatic water tests shall rMERE BURIu SEWER TYPE C SAW dales of the work items in Section 1.1 and testing requirements in Section 4.0. consist oh. IS LEST THAN ¢Evwnm vATREG B. Submit manufacturer's cut sheets fa oil Aping to be instilled. o. Minimum of 2 feet of head over upstream end. 4-1/2 FEET C. Guoranfee. The Carlmclor shill provide a written guarantee to replace any defective port a parts b. Minimum of 6 feel of head over downstream end. a' SDR 35 SEWER u5EPIC H' CRUSHED STONE Adjust head after one hour. I/2 %� DIAMETER e• SDR OS Pan: supplied, incluarrg labor, withal charge to one (I) year starting from the dole of the inspection and d. Measure loss of water during next hour. 5 SEWFR LINE slant -up. _ e. No exfdtration will be acceptable. - OF CRUSHED STONE HE 2.0 PRODUCTS 3. Exfillrotion testing by pressurized our shall be according to the Ramscier procedure and the following: FILTER FABRIC i a. Hold 4.0 psi greater than average groundwater back pressure with no pressure drop for 10 minutes. � PIPE To er eEDOED 2.1 All pi der - Gerrard N N' CRUSHED STONE +0 A. All pipe delevererl a the job site shill be clearly marked at the es,factory with the class of pipe, the WATER NOTES 1� z4 �'I f PERFORATED PIPE-� STATION 6+00 - 8+45 anufocturer's identification, and all else as required by the codes, standards and specifications referred to under this section. Omission of this information will be cause fa rejection of pipe. 24 �I B. Caps and Plugs - Wbtwt' hl and producing the same pint conditions as the pipe on which the cap a Water STPMY Basis of Design (All Lots): plug is placed. SEWER TRENCH DETAIL STATION 0+00 - 8+00 C. Foundation - EmWt as otherwise specified for specific plpnq materials, crushed stone foundation a) Average day demand - 4 bedroom house ® 490 qpd (NOT TO SCALE) SEWER TRENCH WITH material shill tmlorm to the requnemenls of type C till as specified. b) Maximum day demand (gpm) - 0.68 UNDER DRAIN PIPE DETAIL c) Instantaneous peak demand (gpm) = 5 gpm (NOT TO WALE) 2.2 PVC Sewer Pipe d) Source capacity = to be determined A. Sewer pip. and fittings shall meet the requiiemenls of ASTM Specification 3034 for SDR 35 pipe s) Storage capacity = not required for single family residence -_- and conform to State Standards far sewer pipe. f) Pump capacities = to be determined--------- B. The pipe shall be colored green far In -grand identification of sewer pipe. g) Operating pressure rouges = 30-50 psi C. Provisions must be .mode far construction and expansion at each joint with a rubber ring. The bell h) Reference to the Noodplam = this project is not in the Noodplan shall Moset of on integral all section with a solid cross-section rubber ring, factory assembled, securely locked in place to prevent displacement during assembly. Water Supply Well: USE HEAVY WILY GTT NON FRAIE 2.3 Precast Concrete Manholes WITH 26 COVER WON MTOISR RING I) Install well in the location shown on the Ion. MARKED 'SEWER, A. Concrete manholes will be built (o ASTM Specification C748-88 T' GRADE B. Concrte espoil be 4000-P51 concrete, 28-day strength. 2) Provide will drillerREMOVABLE CAP s log. � `•+- �+.• C. Steel reinforcing shill meet ASTM specifications 0.12 sq. in. per Vertical loot. 3) Provide well driller's certification as specified below. 0. Flexible manhde sleeves for sewer pipe connections shall conform (o ASTM Specification C-923. LASER To BE E. Sealant between amcrete. sections and homes shall be a minimum 1-inch butyl pint sealant meeting the laspeolioTs and Cerliftaotionc O SAYE 911 s 4EEVE TO Y DEPTH requirements of ASTM Specification C-990. LADDER ALL MISTS, OUTLETS i0 BE WATER -TIGHT MATERIALASAAS F. Materials used 'err bones and covers shall meet or exceed ASTM Specification A48-76, Class 30. 1) It is the owner's/ contractor's responsibility to contact the USE RUBBER UTLETS E%tBE WA OF TIGHTMANHOLE LOk G. Ladder is to be steel reinforced copolymer p(opoleyne. consultant fur the following: o SHELL TO BE BITUMINOUS COATED. DEPW ,g R o.Ko 2.4 Fit Materials a) For stakeout of the well locations. A. Type A - Crushed Gravel - Crushed gravel shall consist of hard, shop, clew material, It shell be free TOTAL DEPTH 45' EIRm from any considerable amount of flak, laminated or elongated particles and shall be free from shells, day, 2) the well driller wnl A5 PER PLANS provide the consultant with a signed and 4s wYE limestone, dol whiic materials, shale or other deletmous matter. The crushed Slane or grovel shall be doted statement as follows: Ax INv, Rlx xL�nT3� WIRE Lroxxzcna supplied, graded m Idlows: 1 45I. 24 45629 Screen or Sieve Srtt Percent Passn b Wei ht a 2 era 29 41A 20 _ 9 Y 9 1 hereby certify that the inslallotiw-reloled information submitted is 3 435. 30 u0. 30 IEWER 6' IF mPE C SAND 2 inches 100 true and correct, and that in the exercise of my reasonable professional 4 424.e5 432.66 I -pinches 9D to 100 judgment, the potable water supply has been installed in accordance with NOTES: No. 4 30 to 60 the permitted design and all permit conditions, was inspected, was properly 1. 2 PVC PIPE ON IS TO JOINTS ETASHI MEET STII 43DR35 No. 1W 0 to 12 tested, and has successfully met those performance tests. $ No. 200 D to 6 DRAIN CLEAN -OUT SECTION 3) The certification of construction as required by section 1-301 ae'o B. Type 8 - Sand of the Enmrwmcntd Protection Rules may not be provided by BOOTED CONNECTION (NOT TO SCALE) 1. Sand shall be dean. hod, durable, uncoated particles of quartz or other rack, free from lumps of clay, the designs if the awe eo4cml BOO procedures outlined herein are not followed. area As xa nwa TED CONNECTION soft or Oaan material, be loam, organic a other deleterious material. In no case shall Bond containing lumps o of frozen Matum Tx used. 2. Sand shall canton ml moue than 3 percent fins than No. 200 Viers, using AASI1i0 Method 1-11. 3. Sand shall be uniformly graded from course to fine and shall meet the following gradation requirements: - Screen or Sieve Sae Percent Passing by Weight - 12" OF 3/4' CRUSHED STONE S inch 100 No. inch 85 l0 1DO J/ /� �O No. a 60 to 100 MANHOLE (� No. 16 35 to 80 (NOT To SCALE) No. 50 10 to 55 Na. abo a to ID c;4, Ofs 4 ?410 4. The above grodMorn represents the extreme limits, which shill determine suitability for use from all sources Of supply The grodalion Iron any one source shall be reasonable, uniform and not subject to the extreme percentages of grodolion specified above. - HYDRANT - WR EROUSKENNE PAGER C. Type C - Common Fdl OR KENNEDY GUARDIAN 00 1. Type C Cowman Fill shill be clew, Tree ham lumps of frozen material, cloy, soft a poky material, loon, organic or other deklerious material. WATER -SEWER LINE SEPARATION NOTES B. Crossings: A. Horizontal Separation: 1. Sewer crossing oats mans shalt be laid beneath _ V,uu- 3.0 EXECUTION I. Sewers shall be laid at lens( ten feel horizontally the water main with at leas( 18 inches Vertical -- - from any existing or proposed water main. The clearance between the outside of the sewer and the 3.1 Pipe Installation - General distance shun be measured edge to edge outside of the warts man. A. Unless otherwise specified in these specifications, on the drawings, or directed by the Engineer, provide GROUND LEVEL 2. Where impossible or impractical, due (o ledge, 2. When it is impassible to maintain the 18 inch bedding under the pipe of a minimum of six inches of Type B Sand fill for all pipeline. boulders or other unusual c,nlilims, to mountain the Vertical sepur.6w, the crossing shill be arranged so B. Install pipe and Ftbngs so that there will be no deviation at the pints and so that inverts present a (en fool sewer -water pipe horizontal sepnratim between that one full length of sewer pipe is centered above our WATER LINE SEWER LINE smooth Surface. Pipe and fittings, which do not fit together to farm a light fitting pant we not permitted. sewer and water lines, the water line may be in a below the wets line with sewer pats as for as O O C. Whenever pipes new" cuting, a wheel culler, hydraulic pipe culler or pipe sow, satisfactory to the :ewer bench or an on undisturbed earth shelf In possible from water joints. Engineer shall be used. Culling pipes with a cold chisel or cold cutter will not be allowed VALVE BOX AND fA4FR the sewer trench provided that the bottom of the 3. The sewer pipe must be constructed to the water D. Install pipes in the bcalians and to the required lines and grades as shown an the pions, using on approved wall line is at least 18 inches above the top of the man standards lor a minimum distance of 20 feel 18" MINIMUM method of contrd. sewer. Whenever impossible or impractical to maintain either side of the crossing or a total of three pipe 18" MINIMUM E Maintain the excoalion free of water during the progress of the work. No pipes shall be laid in water, nor 4'6" the 18 inch ver(icel separotim, the sewer line shop be lengths, whichever is greater, shall there be my pints made up in water. No separate allowance for pumping or otherwise removing water constructed to normal water line standards and 4. The section constructed to water man standards will be mode. M slides or cave-ins of the trenches a cuts shall be remedied of the expense of the DRAIN HOLE SERNCE VALVE pressure tested to 50 psi for 2 hours prior to must be pressure tested to moin(an 50 psi far 2 SEWER LINE WAILER LINE Conlroc(or and to the satisfaction of the Engineer. backfilling. No leakage shall be allowed for this test. hours without leakage prior to backf7ling beyond one F. Mantas uewliess of installed pipe and fitting xLeriss throughout the work. Plug ends when pipe ANCHOR ROD 8' DUCTILE IRON Took above the pipe to Verily water lightness, instdlolion is not in progress. Dronage of construction excovations through new pipes is prohibited.WATER MAIN 5. Whse o water main crosses under a sews, G. Preparotay to making pipe pints, all surfaces of the partions of the pipe to be pinked, or of the factory d'i adequate structural support shall be provided fa the made jointing anaterld, shall be clean and dry. No painting of the pipes will be permitted n a wet trench or 6" WATER LINE sewer to prevent damage to the water mom, and the WATER -SEWER CROSSING wet excavation. Gaskets, lubricants, primers, adhesives, etc., shall be installed and used as recommended by ports of the sewer line Shan be encased n canaete. the pipe or pint mmulaclureis specifications. Gaskets and other jointing materials shall be protected (NOT TO SCALE) from damage of d limes. Gaskets and pintinq malerids shall be inspected before installation of the pipe, 6" RESILIENT WEDGE VALVE - and any loose w improperly affixed gaskets and pointing materials shall be removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Engineer. The pipe soon be aligned with the previously Installed pipe, and the pint shall FIRE HYDRANT ARRANGE PIPES TO MAXIMIZE DISTANCE be inspected to be sure that the pint has been property made and is light. If, while making the j nl, the BETWEEN CROSSING AND PIPE JOINTS. SEE gasket or jointing materials became looses misplaced the pipe shill be removed and the pint re ode to (NOT TO SCALE) WATER -SEWER LINE SEPERATION NOTES the satisfaction of the Engineer. The pats shill be made in a workmanlike manner so as to obtain the degree of woks ti¢nlness required. REM90NS Fi. Firmly compact back If material around the pipe. Cover the pipe and compact by hand a mechonical tamping 1 OS 05 10 ADD HYDRANT AT OMST BLOCK to a Pon( 12 makes above the top of the pipe. The balance of the backfll to the top of the trench shoN UNDISTURBED EARTH be compacted by mechay be tamping a by mews ro al of thers, subject to the approve of the Engineer. (MINIMUM 1 SWARE -- WATER/WASTEWATER SPECIFICATIONS &DETAILS Jetting and pudding may these permitted with the approval of the Engines only, and in compliance with the FOOT OF CONTACT AREA) vinous other mtnns of these specifications 3.2 Sews Line or Farm Main and Water Una Grassarere HYDRANT w4� ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA ove A. Sewer our fanations ns Crossing water Ines shall be laid beneath the water tine with at least 18' of vertical oil o O °onlb° �A7yT' �.1�� separation. If it. seer line most be land abthe wets line, then: pO o Oocoo r G 1. The sews must be constructed to oats Ina standards (ASTM 02241 for SDR 26 ppe) fa o minimum distance THREE LOT SUBDIVISION Of 20 feel to tithe side of the water erne 2. The crossng shd be arranged so that One full length of sewer line is centered over the water line. 0�� HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT FELT PAPER BETWEEN SCALE : NTS MCCAIN CONSULTING, INC. DESIGNED BY: GNN PROJECT : Y26103 PIPE AND CONCRETE O DRAWN BY: NOS 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET THRUST BLOCKS CHECKED BY: GNN WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 NDT TO SCALE SITE TECHNICIAN: GUNNER MccAtN DATE: APRIL 26, 2010 SHEET S-3 Y: `Cadd ' 28000's` 261U3' den ' 26103 05-05-10.dw H-237 LEGEND Ao TP-1 Trnverse Point (0 IPF Iron pipe found 41RF Iron rod found Tree 1 ,TOUT LatlluctAongAude point u - Barbed rwe I — too 10' —la- 2' contours Tree line Property line _ Right al way line > Ditch/dromage Swale —w Water line — — — — Building envelope HHHNslxNIHHwNHHHIHwV4 Limits of disWrbrn — — — — — — — — Slone k pot drain —5 Sewer line NOTE: - Locanon M. DRIVEWAYS ARE TO BE PITCHED TOWARD THE BIORETENTION 9 NOTE - PONDS. ALL STORMWATER ROOFTOP RUNOFF IS TO BE STORMWATER W SHEETS S-2 k SW-1 ARE > ` " DIRECTED TO THE 31ORETENDON AREAS NA GRASS EASEMENT 1" a NOT SAME SCALE CHANNELS OR ROCr.OP GUTTER DOWNSPOUTS. w�wrwwA 1" c + l PROPOSED HOPE CUL T I { Ib 4+ i AT DRIVEWA PARCEL 2A (� Re GUT I NOTE: 13,23Q SQ. FT. I s�e ww 1 CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT 'BEFORE YOU DIG' I '. n 2 PROPOSED MANHOLE I (DIG -SAFE) AND VERIFY THE LOCATION OF I_ w — ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 90 tht. ���21, .� IF NOTE: PROPOSED IB' A PERMIT IS REQUIRED FROM THE SOUTH a1d Acr.ad+v �- 'srp1"=- cNOEw -- — 1 HOPE CUL T I BURl1NGTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WDPo(S FOR ALL 1 — _ PARCEL 2B r 9 AT DmN w Y WORK %THIN THE HIGHLAND TERRACE RIGHT-OF-WAY. I 13,150 SQ.FT. 1 CURB CUT 1 BICRETENTION UNDERDRAIN TO DAYLIGHT TO ROAD DITCH (TYP). L _ GRAPHIC SCALE N" _ '7A wu PARCEL 2C 0 �6 D 1 I OPE CULVE �-- BIORETENRON PONDS (TYP T BOTTOM DIMENSIONS: 10'NI6' ( IN FEET) 2A AaI 13.070 SQ.FT. s retie -� T�O21aWAY HDOHT 2.0" SOIL TYPE ON PROPERY G DIAMETER OUTLET AT 1.0' 1 inch - 30 ft. s I g 5011. SPILLWAY AT 1.8' VeB Vergennes D W Ir � Topography by Tnta! Station L"IPPIF ` Contour Interval 2' I (RI Er rfD Iww Raw Assumed Datum sa wa Rxwr-a-w.r I I IYMR. � —.y � 12' MIN. TY MIN. I I I FIELDSTONE FOR I CONCRETE f BLOCK HEADWALL o• �aa . HOPE CULVERT + -- DIAMETER AS SPECIFIED LINE DITCH FROM CULVERT TO 25' DOWN STREAM WTH 5" STONE EROSION CONTROL NUMBER 6 CULVERT HEADWALL DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) mAN NEr LONaMIN.AL MEW SECTION NEW rr— lhwA — w Napa yeo1N GRASS CHANNEL than 5% dwl aHia waYae — (NOT TO SCALE) matlh9 to -I— a atatw vwletolM ahwwErosion. SON Ern Cantrd Matting petal far an ho"w Aetal. STONE (3"-5" NiwwY OPTIONAL I'eOUTLHT TO BE INSTALLED 3/4 View Top Yew BIORETENTION POND OUTLET DETAIL (NOT To SCAIE) P"O i Para 2 W Drtlet EtwN. i.0, Lw Swilway El- usLW LLw Dust EI.. EO' e DRY POND/BIORETENTION CELL (NOT TO SCALE) - LWAY CREST AND I TYPE 11 STONE Nat uY A]fD aNwa wS-WMF.ICRMFO WN-SEEP care aR wwawn Eawl NsrAa mR uAwfncMRms MTNCTDNS woc awtt vw< YASHC N ,,,� nwac ParcwnnW Nar A5>m I .-YAslf NN -wm war Rrt ANTI -SEEP COLLAR aPoT Po Sala Y: \Cadd\2 001 Blaretentlon Planting Plan The Blyd 6 Butterfly Meadow -Sun Abr Oty Botanical Name Common Name Height Spread S. Interest Spacing Install Size AT 7 Asclepias tuberosa Butterfly Plant 1-2.5' 1-1.5' Summer 15-22' 1 Gallon AN 6 Aster novae-onglloe New England Aster 18, 1. 5-2' Fall 22' 1 Gallon EP 14 EchTnaceo purpureo 'Alba' Coneflower 30, 1-2' Summer 15-22' 1 Gallon LCF 11 Lyslmachia ciliate Firecracker' Fringed Loosestrife 1-3' 2-2.5' Summer 22-30' 1 Gallon PV 16 Panicum vlrgatum Switch Grass 3-4' 2-3' Sp, Su, Fall 22-30' 1-2 Gallon VH 10 Verbena hostate Blue Vervain 2-6' t-I.5' Su, Fall 15-22' 4' Pot M 7 EPI VARIES �—VARIES—d TOTAL TRENCH LENGTH won PEAYNN nNl w.T4DPED {RDY E.NWES m-no N et wNwxT RM GMDa YwPoA1 MT. nnNac RATES YAT N iREYIETfo No Nmown Br N9Nifn. CONTACT aSlpq f Tf aNIXN m Noi IDaAND N A w.1NT AREA fa1a11C 9W DEwlOPYFNi. L nW —w%- 9glla N A SNDY laW, LONrr SAND, law, a A ../— wA (u- wfWtD CaTAN A — DS ra YDY. -d. er .au IRE - Cw1awT fa MESS M, SNaAD w -- MAN 2%eT taaN (Elea 1-l. Say S — w TE A a YL nASWMATpNS a Tf tNE[D Sal CLASEfICA" SK M], A mwfNNr r a AT KE l la raar mr aY (osAw) a RE— (A CdHMATW vAwE a a s rtEr PEx wr a usm Pm aaaT nrt ma awD N rrwi a sTofS No—, 1PoWY YATWn 01a1 r-N nNWra. Aq Iwuar U SJM fAa ND Y NEEDS (1— a Tf fl.WwC Sa or Aa eE N ars ❑ If 10If, taosnr caPACWo IrAwm uaAr wM A Donor aR aAooNE ua¢p x of Yaa umt sllaw DE srwwww LAwaysE slnc maE a ooW4 aRaoEo NwwN r) Yaa DR awl Tf rAa Ural SNaRD 0 wll ACED OW MA a s -H Pa Ar tfhST I2 NwTlal uwan N maA A+o PRa a anu YArtWNS sEa As TIED SEEos sat, Rats Etc nw wxa aaxo a AwlAa N A YAWN aPM 0 THE NpES CRAA aPPw45 SNNAD XaT N USED AS A Yaa wTw2a. STORMWATER OVERVIEW ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA THREE LOT SUBDIVISION HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, COMPONENT LOCATIONS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF SITE WORK SCALE : NTS MCCAIN CONSULTING, INC. AND SHALL NOTIFY MCCAIN CONSULTING OF ANY ISSUES CR DISCREPANCIES THAT ARISE FROM THAT RENEW. DESIGNED BY: PETER C. LAZORCHAK RE THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE DRAWN BY: WDB 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA SEC. 1403 FOR THE FILING CHECKED BY: PCL OF SURVEY PLATS WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 ,d,g',26106 05-05-10dw,g DATE: APRIL 1, 2010 SHEET SW-1 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington City Development Review Board Fr: Bill Szymanski, City Engineer Date: June 24, 2010 Re: Comments — Algimantas/Neringa — Highland Terrace 1. Water, sewer & drainage plans must be prepared by a VT licensed engineer. Plans must also show seal. I am told Mr. McCain does not possess a VT P.E. license. License requirements are State Law, not City. 2. Existing drainage was built when Highland Terrace was built about 20 years ago. Trudell Engineering did the plans. The system has worked well. It shall not be disturbed. No excavation within 3 feet of this system. 3. Sewer main must be at a location where the manholes are accessible at all time under all conditions. This proposed sewer line must be moved to or close to the center of Highland Terrace. Plan sewer stationing must be as construction station starting at low end. 4. Plan reference to Engineer shall be person with VT PE license who shall be responsible for supervision, inspection and testing. 5. Show street patching of trench. It shall include 18 inches of crusher run gravel, 2 '12 inch bit. base crse, 1 '/2 inch bit. Surface crse, both to be machine laid. 6. Revised plans prepared by VT licensed PE with seal shall be submitted for approval prior to issuing road opening permit. 575 Corset Street South Bcadington, VT 0')4(7:S tel 802 846.410,S fix 802-840.4101 www.shwl com DEVELOPMENT REVL_ BOARD 1 JUNE 2010 PAGE 4 where the line will be shown when the LOMA is received. Mr. Dinklage said the Board can proceed as if they were going to make a decision. Mr. Dinklage stressed that any removal of trees which are shown on the plan would have to come back to the DRB. Ms. LaRose noted that the property is not in an area where storm water review is required. She has not been able to speak with the Stormwater Superintendent. Mr. Rabinowitz said he talked with him, and there were no issues. Ms. LaRose said she will get a letter to that effect. Mr. Knudsen asked if there is any blocking of views to the Lake. Mr. Marshall said existing trees screen the house and are higher than the house will be. There are also existing Lake access paths which will not be compromised. Mr. Rabinowitz said the total square footage will be approximately 2500 sq. ft. plus a possible attic and/or basement, for a 3300 sq. ft. potential. Mr. Lipson, who lives at the south end of the road, said the plans are consistent with the neighborhood, and they strongly support the project. He added that what is proposed is better than what is there now. Mr. Twitchell, an adjoining neighbor, said they are "tickled pink" that this is being done. Members of the Board indicated they favored approval when the federal issue is resolved. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Conditional Use Application #CU-10-07 of Kathleen & Thomas Easton until 15 June 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7.�reliminary Plat Application #SD-10-16 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna to subdivide a 39,450 sq. ft. parcel into three lots of approximately equal size, Highland Terrace: Mr. Knudsen stepped down during this application due to a conflict of interest. Mr. McCain showed the proposed layout with proposed house footprints. There would be similar houses on all 3 lots. One of the houses would be occupied by the Shalna's daughter and her husband. Mr. Dinklage noted that this review does not include approval for the houses. Mr. McCain said water would be on -site because it is cost prohibitive to bring in city water because of the elevation. The proposed hydrant has been okayed by the Fire Chief. Ms. LaRose said the Water Department is OK with this. Mr. McCain added there will also be "rain gardens." The applicant is requesting that TDR's not be required to be purchased before the filing of the DEVELOPMENT REVIL ,y BOARD 1 JUNE 2010 PAGE 5 mylar. Mr. Belair said that is up to the Board, but it is possible that an option to purchase would suffice. Mr. McCain said they would have no problem with that. Mr. Dinklage asked whether there would be a sidewalk. Mr. Stuono felt there should be. Mr. Belair suggested speaking with the Public Works director as there are topography issues. Members felt the homes should conform to the SEQ guidelines. Mr. Shalna said 50 homes down the road have garages in front. Ms. LaRose said they were built under the older regulations. Mr. Dinkalge stressed that the applicant gets additional houses because of those new regulations. The applicant felt no one would want a house with a one -car garage with this kind of house. Mr. Stuono said that with dense neighborhoods, design is very important. Mr. Wessel noted that the hydrant is proposed on the southwest corner of their lot. He said water pressure there is not adequate. He felt the city needs to put in money to get adequate water pressure. This would be, in his opinion, a better solution than drilling 3 wells. Mr. Dinklage said that is an issue for the City Council. Mr. Wessel asked who would maintain the rain gardens. Mr. McCain said homeowners would, as the gardens will be right in front of their homes. Mr. Dinklage asked if the city has authority to make sure these work as they should. Mr. Belair said this is difficult with single family dwellings as the city doesn't get grading plans and that level of detail. Mr. Dinklage suggested this be taken to the appropriate body to get "teeth" into the regulations so problems get fixed if they develop. Ms. Kruger felt a sidewalk was important as are street lights. Mr. Dinklage said that is a city issue. Mr. Kruger felt the plan was ridiculous for the neighborhood as these lots can't compare in any way to the existing character of the neighborhood. The approval motion was amended to indicate that an option for the TDR's be secured before the mylar. The purchase of the TDR's must be recorded before the building of houses 2 and 3. The Board indicated its desire for sidewalks, if that is deemed feasible by the Public Works Director. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-10-16 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Conditional Use Application 4CU-10-66 of Margaret Novotny to amend a previously approved plan for a 9,800 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting 4,410 sq. ft. to social services use, 72 Ethan Allen Drive: and 9. Site Plan Application #SP-10-34 of Margaret Novotny to amend a previously approved plan for a 9,800 sq. ft. building used for general office use. The amendment consists of converting 4,410 sq. ft. to social services use, 72 Ethan Allen Drive: V P RMONT 6 State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency of Natural Resources WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWSZREGULATIONS INVOLVED io V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective April 25, 2005 Permit Number: WW-4-3521 Landowner: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna Address: 25 Slate Barn Drive Williston, VT 05495 This permit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: 0850-00045 and referenced in the deed recorded in Book 754 Pages 310-311 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of a three lot, single family residence subdivision, Parcels 2A, 2B & 2C each for a four bedroom single family residence utilizing individual, on -site drilled well water supplies and municipal sewer services, located off Highland Terrace in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. 1.GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the application, plans and/or documents prepared by McCain Consulting, Inc., with the stamped plans listed as follows: 1.2 Sheet Title Plan Date Plan Revision Date S-1 Site Plan April 26, 08/04/10 2010 S-2 Sewer Line Profile April 26, 08/04/10 2010 S-3 Water/Wastewater Specifications &Details April 26, 8/04/10 2010 F ML.._L _71_ lire p ujeCL shall ifui ueviate from the stamped plans in a manner that would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location, or, the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 1.3 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 25o District Environmental Commission, the Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Supply Division — telephone (802) 241-3400, Water Quality Division — telephone (802) 241-3770, the Department Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety— telephone (802) 879-2300, the Department of Health — telephone (802) 863-7221, and local officials rior to proceeding with this project. 1.4 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall be responsible for the recording of this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable WatL .1pply Permit W W-4-8521 Page 2 of 3 1.5 Each prospective purchaser of the lot shall be shown copies of the Wastewater System And Potable Water Supply Permit and the stamped plans prior to conveyance of the lot. 1.6 This project has been reviewed and approved for the construction of one, four bedroom single family residence on each of the approved lots. By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. 1.7 In issuing this permit, the Division has relied upon the licensed designer's certification that the design - related information submitted was true and correct, and complies with the Vermont Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules and the Vermont Water Supply Rules. This permit may be revoked if it is determined that the project does not comply with these Rules. 1.8 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with fo V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2.WATER SUPPLY 2.1 No permit issued by the Secretary shall remain valid after substantial completion of a potable water supply until the Secretary receives a signed and dated certification from a designer or an installer, as specified in the permit, that states: "I hereby certify that in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment the installation - related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply was installed in accordance with: the permitted design and all permit conditions; or record drawings and such record drawings are in compliance with the applicable rules, were filed with the Secretary, and are in accordance with all other permit conditions; was inspected; was properly tested; and has successfully met those performance tests." This certification shall include the water supply system and water service lines to each structure. Compliance with this condition is required prior to occupancy of each structure. 2.2 Each lot is approved for an on -site water supply system from a drilled well provided that the well is located as shown on the stamped plan. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of obtaining potable water without prior review and approval. 2.3 The well locations shall meet all minimum separation distances required by the Chapter 21, Water Supply Rule, Appendix A, Part i1- Small Scale Water Systems, Section 11.4. The well shall be constructed in accordance with the Appendix A, Part 12 .WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 3.1 No permit issued by the Secretary shall remain valid after substantial completion of a wastewater system until the Secretary receives a signed and dated certification from a designer or an installer, as specified in the permit, that states: "I hereby certify that in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment the installation - related information submitted is true and correct and the wastewater system was installed in accordance with: the permitted design and all permit conditions; or record drawings and such record drawings are in compliance with the applicable rules, were filed with the Secretary, and are in accordance with all other permit conditions; was inspected; was properly tested; and has successfully met those performance tests." This certification shall include the wastewater collection and delivery system and wastewater service lines to each structure. Compliance with this condition is required prior to occupancy of each structure. 3.1 This project is approved for connection to the municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the stamped plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 630 gallons of wastewater per day. No changes to the wastewater disposal system shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. r Wastewater System and Potable Wat Ipply Permit WW-4-3521 Page 3 of 3 3.2 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the municipal approval expires, and the municipality files a written request with the Secretary, the Secretary will remove the sewage allocation for this project from the list of committed reserve capacity. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval and does not request that the Secretary remove the sewage allocation for this project from the list of committed reserve. Once the project is removed from the list of committed reserve capacity, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. Justin G. Johnson, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Willi4 i E. Zabiloskl/Assistant Regional Engineer Dated August lo, 2010 cc: South Burlington Planning Commission McCain Consulting, Inc. Water Supply Division / Page 1 of 1 ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 1:46 PM To: ray Subject: Highland Terrace - Shauna Project Ray, I looked at the plans and they accurately reflect and have incorporated all my design review comments. JUSTIN f:�ABIDOUX DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CI.I.Y ENGINEER CITY Or SOUTH BURLINGTON 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05405 (802) 658-7961 JRABIDOUX@SBUR COM WWW.SBURI....,C:OM 8/19/2010 IERE ARE NO KNOWN PSoC'S IN 4" PERFORATED PVC DRAIN IE WELL SHIELD 8" SDR 35 PVC SEWER LINE �I (SEE SEWER TRENCH WITH UNDER I DRAIN PIPE DETAIL SHEET S-3) I , I ATCH LINE I INSTAL STONE AND PIPE DRAIN I I ALONG E SEWER LINE TO I z p EPLACE ISTING DRAIN ALONG HI- ND RRACE m MAILBOX44- I —. IRF+ I 5 I PROPOSED 18" " APPLE I HDPE CULVERT W 0 %" P.E. PROPOSED PROPOSE I AT DRIVEWAY I DRIVEWAY l CURB CUT WATER LINE HOUSE I SB T� PROPOSED 7 SB- LILAC I I I I PROPOSED DRILLED WELL ` MANHOLE 1 I S 4" SDR 35 PVC J( SEWER LINES 249'f o _ - 0 I TP-3 i -- P OPOSED 18" _ w H E CULVERT 2 B I I PROPOSED A DRIVEWAY FT. " P. E DRIVEWAY I I U B CUT . WATER LINE I I PROPOSED I I ILLED WELL _ I L 5" A 24� 5" MAPLE , _ — " C.O. -- / SB 5 PROPOSE ,`'+ P OPOSED 18" r ,EL 2C _4 o� I DRIVEWAY I H I A PE CULVERT DRIVEWAY S Q FT. I "� C I RB CUT . `c� 5" APPLE PROPOSED DRILLED WELL — I W — d _ IPF � I -- 4" — P.E. (3 6" APP ---�� _ BENCHMAR 6 L WATER tlfll�� — GROUND AT IPF 60' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY ELEVATION ® 457.0 �-� 247 f O THERE ARE NO KNOWN PSoC'S IN THE WELL SHIELD southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD -- APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑ Preliminary �kFinal PUD Being Requested? ❑ Yes rX No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) raemcni��S 2-, n -Dav-e OS494; —J J Cekl &SS 91-BS 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #)3I0 - 3 1 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 1, r-r-► n-+l „ „ L,,,,,\ � : 214`4 - S(j9 2, {-G4 ! 2*-4 `t - -t'An G- a. Contact email address: 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRES 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) uzso - oob-4S Subdivison Plat Application 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): t�nrQ'_, lad SL tJ Ss n-- � c�t S 2A ��_� eaoln w a c-1 for 1 � cac.r) an 'rY1 -A ), \ r,)M\eD we\\ Onco'inec%�_-n Vn n rtrT�,\ Svure-" b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): ces,Oen)iib,1 Y -13.rm (\,o,..> rQs;c)enceS d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): �rno��� i .tea c , fP ,nkoa,I zA 1023Lu S.� _��,,,n� (2-46,me ) e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 2 �k ..s _ a„ )( f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): S , o,-) rC.'\A5 g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): n/G h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): SEC2- or i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. n 1,A 2 Subdivison Plat Application 9. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) \\ a. Size of Parcel: 6 _ i'V_ acre, (��,�{ s. .) (acres /sq. ft.) b. Building Coverage: Existing square feet % Proposed a%square feet " �l �' % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing square feet % Proposed square feet (`7 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed n c� square feet % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, Il, or III) on the subject property? ❑ Yes X No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) S rk:,v 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: lhwsri sAPS 0.-( ac„,�>SQ. FT. `Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 Subdivison Plat Application 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping: $ Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) T 67 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 2,0 to P ene'S b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 16. PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach on a separate sheet. SYe C-) 4 Subdivison Plat Application 17. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I �� I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be - /complete U Incomplete t4-1 .alp PRINT NAME, /a McCain Consulting, Inc. Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting June 14, 2010 Ray Belair South Burlington Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Application for 3-Lot Subdivision, Final Review Shalna Property, Highland Terrace, South Burlington McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Ray, Enclosed please find the following information in support of the above referenced project: 1. A complete Final Review application 2. A fee check in the amount of $513.00 (five hundred thirteen dollars) 3. A list of adjoining landowners 4. A copy of the response to Public Works 5. Five (5) 24" x 36" copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy of the site plans (Sheets S-1 through S-3 dated 4/26/10, revised 515110 and SW-1 dated 4/1/10, revised 515110) 6. Five (5) 18" x 24" copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy of the survey (Sheet 1 of 1, dated 6/10/10) I believe this is all you need. Please contact us when the date for Final Review has been determined. Thank you and please feel free to call with any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, McC ' Consul in Inc. c r r`. Nicole Fitch Project Administrator Enc. Cc: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, w/ enclosures 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 • Waterbury, VT 05676 • (802) 244-5093 Tel. • (802) 244-7492 Fax McCain Consulting, Inc. June 14, 2010 t* Justin Rabidoux, Director South Burlington Department of Public Works 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: #SD-10-16, Algimantas Shalna — Highland Terrace McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Justin, Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting As per your review comments dated May 27, 2010 and our subsequent phone conversations, enclosed please find revised plans for the project. Your comments are addressed/answered as follows: 1. The jurisdictional threshold for the State's Operational Stormwater Permit is not met as there is less than 1 acre of impervious surface. 2. The Stormwater Easement noted on the plans is a private easement for the homeowners as the bio-retention areas straddle the property lines. There is no expectation that the city will provide the maintenance. 3. The bio-retention areas have been re -designed to daylight to the road ditch. See Sheet SW-1 4. The pipe bend has been eliminated. See Sheet SW -I. 5. The Vermont Stormwater Manual was the basis of design for the bio-retention areas. 6. As per the note on Sheet SW-1, the grass channels will be used to direct runoff to the bio-retention areas. 7. The bio-retention daylight pipe size and material are noted on Sheet SW -I. 8. 18" driveway culverts have been specified for the curb cuts. See Sheets S-1 and SW -I. 9. The erosion control matting is not shown on the plan as the standard detail used specifies matting on slopes over 5%, and the slopes on this site are all less than 5%. 10. It is anticipated that the driveways will be paved. 11. The relationship between the pond outlets and crests are shown on the plans. See Sheet SW -I. 12. Contour elevations are shown. Benchmarks have been added to Sheet S-1. 13. Footing drains will not be utilized as there is nowhere to daylight the pipe. Sump pumps will be used if full foundations are constructed. Y:\Projects\26'sQ6103\2009\Tow \JRabidou Letter 6-14-10.doc 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 • Waterbury, VT 05676 • (802) 244-5093 Tel. • (802) 244-7492 Fax Justin Kabidoux June 14, 2010 p•2 14. Notes that a permit from the Department of Public Works is required for all work within the street right-of-way have been added to the plans. See Sheets S-1 and SW-1. 15. It is anticipated that pavement excavation will not be necessary to install the sewer line and manholes. The line has been shifted slightly to the west to ensure that this can be done. 16. Note 2.2.A on Sheet SW-1 has been edited per your request. 17. The manhole cover diameter has been revised. See Sheet S-3. 18. The standard trench detail has been clarified. See Sheet S-3. 19. The sewer line/underdrain trench detail has been revised to have the sewer line on a trench shelf 18" above the underdrain from stations 0+00 to 6+00. The underdrain ends at 6+00, and has a solid pipe continuing to the existing storm drain at station 8+45 20. The manhole detail, showing a poured trough and specifying rim and invert elevations for the 4 proposed manholes is shown on Sheet S-3. 21. The stormdrain daylights to the east, on property owned by Bill Wessel, and is depicted on Sheet S-2. I believe this addresses all of your comments. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, McCain Consulting, Inc. Gunner McCain Enc. Cc: Algintantas Shalna, w/ enclosures Y:\Projects\26's\26103\2009\TowuVRabidom Letter 6-14-10.doc Page 1 of 1 http://www.houseplans.net/uploads/floorplanelevations/full-15791. jpg 6/14/2010 Page 1 of 1 q5O ooa o� http://www.houseplans.net/uploads/floorplanelevations/full-15790. jpg 6/14/2010 AMERICA, S BEST HOUSE PLANS - WWW.HOUSEPLANS.NET HOUSE PLAN 2559-00208 View the Floorplan FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION If a real photograph is available please note that it may reflect the homeowner's modifications to the plan and that you should always reference the floor plans and renderings. Features Additional Rooms Home Office Master Up Garage Type Front Entry Porch Type Front Rear NEED HELP? ,jLLIVE CHAT click to chat with a live representative Square Footage: 1,988 sq. ft. First Floor: 1,117 sq. ft. Second Floor: 871 sq. ft. Floors: 2 Bedrooms: 3 Bathrooms: 2 Half Baths: 1 Garages: 2 car Width: 40ft. Depth: 44ft. Height: 30ft. Foundation: Crawl Space Ceiling Height First Floor: 9 feet More House Plans by this designer Save House Plan Modify This Plan Cost Build Report Email to Friend Print This Page Pricing 5 Sets: $685.00 8 Sets: $715.00 Reproducible: $850.00 PDF: $850.00 CAD Files: $1,450.00 Additional Options Additional Construction Sets: $25.00 Material List: $75.00 Slab Foundation: $95.00 Basement Foundation: $225.00 ***This plan is not eligible for discounts*** LADLDT O CART � I "o Am Authori Glob:► PAYMENT PROCESSING HOUSE PLAN RESOURCES HOME PLANS HOME PLANS - AMERICA'S BEST HOUSE PLANS HOUSE PLAN BLOG HOUSE PLANS - AMERICAN GABLES, INC. HOUSE PLANS - GARRELL ASSOCIATES, INC. HOUSE PLANS - PLAN ETHOU SEPLANS. COM HOUSE PLANS HOUSE PLANS COASTAL HOME PLANS Rear Estate of I i o ( I'"S,Ii .i3f7; �� Tom Algimantas & Neringa Shalna Parcel 0850-00045 Adjoining Landowners Parcel Adioiner 0850-00009 Douglas W. & Elaine Maynes 9 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0850-00030 Gardner Construction P.O. Box 21 Colchester, VT 05446 0850-00040 John W. & Patricia A. Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01405 Homer L. & Marie J. Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01440 Judith M. Lavanway 1440 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01450 Thaddeus McDougal & Jamie Fratamico 1450 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Y:AProjects\26's\26103\2009ATow \Adjoinem.doc June 16, 2010 Algimantas and Neringa Shalna 25 Slade Barn Drive Williston, VT 05495 Re: 45 Highland Terrace Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public hearing notice that will be printed in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, ?Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802,846.4106 fax 802,846.4101 www.sburl.com 00000987 � V : 831 PG: 33 DENSITY REDUCTION EASEMENT AND TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS TO BENEFITTED PROPERTY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that PAUL DANDURAND, of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More ($10.00) Dollars paid to his full satisfaction by ALGIMANTAS SHALNA and NERINGA SHALNA, husband and wife, of Williston, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, Grantees, by these presents does freely, give, grant, sell, convey and confirm unto the said Grantees, ALGIMANTAS SHALNA and NERINGA SHALNA, husband and wife, as tenants by the entirety, and their heirs and assigns forever, certain development rights, as set forth below, in property located in the City of South Burlington, more particularly described as follows: A lot of land consisting of 10.5 acres, more or less, located on the South side of Van Sicklen Road, so-called, "Property", and being more particularly shown and depicted on a plan entitled, " _Lands of Van Sicklen Limited Partnership, Property Plat North_ ", dated _12 1 99, and recorded in Volume _495_ at Page 187 of the South Burlington Land Records. Being all of the lands and premises conveyed to Grantor by warranty deed of The Van Sicklen Limited Partnership , dated 4 9 03 , and recorded in Volume 604 at Page _549-552� of the South Burlington Land Records. The Property is subject to and is benefitted by the City of South Burlington Land Development Regulations, last amended 12 15 08 R ulations, a copy of which are recorded in Volume / at Page of the South Burlington Land Records. lUnder said regu ations, eact acre of the Property has potential for development for on -residential purposes with a maximum building lot coverage offir percent ((!�%), or for residential purposes at a density of one ( ) of a dwelling unit. This development potential is referred to herein as "Development Rights". By this Density Reduction Easement, Grantor does hereby convey to Grantee the Development Rights for _.83 acres of the Property. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Received Dec 31r2008 02:00P Rlorded in VOL: $31 PG: 33% OF So. Burlington Land Records Attest: Donna Yinville City Clerk 00000987 , v = 831 RG = 34 � Grantor retains the Development Rights for _9.67 acres of the Property. If, prior to the Property being developed to the maximum density authorized by Grantor's retained Development Rights, the City modifies its Regulations to reduce the development potential of the 9.67` acres for which Grantor retained Development Rights, then Grantor shall forfeit said Development Rights. Upon such forfeiture, Grantor shall have the right to develop the Property to the extent authorized by the Regulations in effect. In addition to the retained Development Rights discussed above, Grantor retains the right to utilize any increase in the development potential of the 9.67_ acres of the Property attributable to changes in the Regulations that allow development to occur at a density greater than that available under the Regulations. All with the fee owner rights retained by Grantor, as above -described, shall run Property and be transferred automatically to any successor of the Property. If the Regulations are hereafter changed in a way that ascribes development potential to the Property on any basis other than that described above, the City shall implement the terms of this easement by developing a method to equate the above -described development potential to the new development potential. The Development Rights hereby conveyed to Grantee provide_ potential for development for non-residential purposes of square feet of building lot coverage, or for residential purposes of one (1) dwelling unit, as determined under the Regulations. They may be used by Grantee only in connection with development of a lot of land consisting of 39,450 square feet, more or less, located on the west side of Highland Terrace, so-called, "Benefitted Property", and being more particularly shown and depicted as "Parcel 2, 39,450 sq. ft." on a plat of survey entitled, "Survey of the Lands of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, Vermont Route 116 & Highland Terrace, South Burlington, Vermont" , prepared by McCain Consulting, Inc., dated April 18, 2008, andof record in Map Slide i� of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Use of these Development Rights is further subject to a decision of the City of South Burlington Development Review Board regarding Final Plat Application #SD-08-36, dated August 5, 2008 and recorded in Volume at Page of the South Burlington Land Records. Terms used in this conveyance shall have the meaning they are assigned by the Regulations unless another meaning is clearly indicated. 2 } 00000987 t V: 831 PG: 35 Reference is hereby made to the foregoing deeds, plans and regulations, and the records thereof, and to all documents therein referred to and the records thereof, in aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to ALGIMANTAS SHALNA and NERINGA SHALNA, husband and wife, as tenants by the entirety, Grantees, and their heirs and assigns, to their use as provided herein, forever; and the said Grantor, PAUL DANDURAND, does for himself, and his heirs and assigns, covenant with Grantees and their heirs and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, he is the sole owner of the rights, and he has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, and that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PAUL DANDURAND has caused his name and seal to be hereunto set this ! day of Di--ct-rn6A-�/r , 2008 . IN THE P SENCE OF: WITNESS PAUL DAN URAND STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At �`o.,. this � day of 'Dece&%A,LA.-,' , 2008, personally appeared PAUL DANDURAND, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public 3 Corw,m;r.&f.211o(ii END OF DOCUMENT 1 -�5 ffAc IV4 � Page 1 of 1 ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:43 PM To: ray Subject: Highlan Terrace Sidewalk Ray, I looked at Highland Terrace, specifically to see if a sidewalk on the west side from Dubois Drive to the project site would work. There is substantial tree, shrub and undergrowth screening on the west side of Highland that is of significant value to Highland residents. Installing sidewalk would result in the loss of that buffer. That fact, combined with a small 3-unit development proposal that is a minor pedestrian generator, leads me to not recommend making it a condition of the project to install the sidewalk. JUSTIN IZABIDOUX DIREC fOR OF PUBLIC WORKSIC11 Y ENGINEER NO CITY OFSOUTI"I BURLINGTON 575 DORSET STREET SOU.I I l BURLING.I ON, VT 05/103 (802) 658-796 t JRABIDOUX@SBURL.COM WWW.SBI.IRL.COM 6/3/2010 June 1, 2010 Algimantas and Gummer McCain McCain Consulting, Inc. 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: 45 Highland Terrace Dear Mr. Shalna and Mr. McCain: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on.June 1, 2010 (effective 6/1/2010). Please note the conditions including that you must submit for final plat within 12 months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, A 4 Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 701.0 0290 0000 2215 2548 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com t' a PLANNING & ZONING June 8, 2010 Pat Truter 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 45 Highland Terrace Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846,4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com PLANNING & ZONING June o, 2010 Bill Wessel 70 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 45 Highland Terrace Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, ey, a x._ Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 5.75 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com "M Sha nk V-4,11 - Interested Persons Record and Service List ENM0 NT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S:A. § 4.461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested ,persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME nnnu Mr-- Ammmr-e.^ _ (Jo-/L� bl� — •- ��-����� q�l to f-MUJr-U I Ut- IN I CREST Loa 9,:)" �&(4 72- _ r3S LEI /M'�I- AI 6Au6- a e lot ru 4,4 i weeKA.. _ Pit, V r.9 M 0NT Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V S A. § 4461(b) The DRB must �uSt keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of.notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). NEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST �atra�` s r 3C o� �.. �a e firs 1 Cz.UTL � % 5-[f 0k)4 t s 1W MAW VA, w3�t J'V I 5. �.` �'��g ✓aB' /'/'� lei/��j'e5' �.6,/�� .� f � � ill/.�,�,� .f . 3 5- W,,Ju a b t VT 72- a e Interested Persons Record and Service List N f. RM D N T Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of.notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAII IAIr Annor:cc r,m• I- .. -36 Wen- ""4)1 I yr 114 1 CRCJ 1 -7d- -ef1lan Allen b6,,;e_ J ci noV ®J Z7 '`J' ���j n VT OS-4gs- 6- �u i �' Ins V 'T OS4`y � 3 S. S� 10 Eu bn[S�F�zi7 .lt l owl I�vL de l +rleeV-)P- 7% // 4W444 7-c�k 4/7 A4,�Y—Rdeck ywp � DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 JUNE 2010 PAGE 4 where the line will be shown when the LOMA is received. Mr. Dinklage said the Board can proceed as if they were going to make a decision. Mr. Dinklage stressed that any removal of trees which are shown on the plan would have to come back to the DRB. Ms. LaRose noted that the property is not in an area where storm water review is required. She has not been able to speak with the Stormwater Superintendent. Mr. Rabinowitz said he talked with him, and there were no issues. Ms. LaRose said she will get a letter to that effect. Mr. Knudsen asked if there is any blocking of views to the Lake. Mr. Marshall said existing trees screen the house and are higher than the house will be. There are also existing Lake access paths which will not be compromised. Mr. Rabinowitz said the total square footage will be approximately 2500 sq. ft. plus a possible attic and/or basement, for a 3300 sq. ft. potential. Mr. Lipson, who lives at the south end of the road, said the plans are consistent with the neighborhood, and they strongly support the project. He added that what is proposed is better than what is there now. Mr. Twitchell, an adjoining neighbor, said they are "tickled pink" that this is being done. Members of the Board indicated they favored approval when the federal issue is resolved. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Conditional Use Application #CU-10-07 of Kathleen & Thomas Easton until 15 June 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Preliminary Plat Application #SD-10-16 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna to subdivide a 39,450 sq. ft. parcel into three lots of approximately equal size, Highland Terrace: Mr. Knudsen stepped down during this application due to a conflict of interest. Mr. McCain showed the proposed layout with proposed house footprints. There would be similar houses on all 3 lots. One of the houses would be occupied by the Shalna's daughter and her husband. Mr. Dinklage noted that this review does not include approval for the houses. Mr. McCain said water would be on -site because it is cost prohibitive to bring in city water because of the elevation. The proposed hydrant has been okayed by the Fire Chief. Ms. LaRose said the Water Department is OK with this. Mr. McCain added there will also be "rain gardens." The applicant is requesting that TDR's not be required to be purchased before the filing of the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 JUNE 2010 PAGE 5 mylar. Mr. Belair said that is up to the Board, but it is possible that an option to purchase would suffice. Mr. McCain said they would have no problem with that. Mr. Dinklage asked whether there would be a sidewalk. Mr. Stuono felt there should be. Mr. Belair suggested speaking with the Public Works director as there are topography issues. Members felt the homes should conform to the SEQ guidelines. Mr. Shalna said 50 homes down the road have garages in front. Ms. LaRose said they were built under the older regulations. Mr. Dinkalge stressed that the applicant gets additional houses because of those new regulations. The applicant felt no one would want a house with a one -car garage with this kind of house. Mr. Stuono said that with dense neighborhoods, design is very important. Mr. Wessel noted that the hydrant is proposed on the southwest corner of their lot. He said water pressure there is not adequate. He felt the city needs to put in money to get adequate water pressure. This would be, in his opinion, a better solution than drilling 3 wells. Mr. Dinklage said that is an issue for the City Council. Mr. Wessel asked who would maintain the rain gardens. Mr. McCain said homeowners would, as the gardens will be right in front of their homes. Mr. Dinklage asked if the city has authority to make sure these work as they should. Mr. Belair said this is difficult with single family dwellings as the city doesn't get grading plans and that level of detail. Mr. Dinklage suggested this be taken to the appropriate body to get "teeth" into the regulations so problems get fixed if they develop. Ms. Kruger felt a sidewalk was important as are street lights. Mr. Dinklage said that is a city issue. Mr. Kruger felt the plan was ridiculous for the neighborhood as these lots can't compare in any way to the existing character of the neighborhood. The approval motion was amended to indicate that an option for the TDR's be secured before the mylar. The purchase of the TDR's must be recorded before the building of houses 2 and 3. The Board indicated its desire for sidewalks, if that is deemed feasible by the Public Works Director. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-10-16 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Conditional Use Application #CU-10-66 of Margaret Novotny to amend a previously approved plan for a 9,800 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting 4,410 sq. ft. to social services use, 72 Ethan Allen Drive: and 9. Site Plan Application #SP-10-34 of Margaret Novotny to amend a previously approved plan for a 9,800 sq. ft. building used for general office use. The amendment consists of converting 4,410 sq. ft. to social services use, 72 Ethan Allen Drive: MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington City Development Review Board Fr: Bill Szymanski, City Engineer Date: May 14, 2010 Re: Comments — Algimantas Shalna, 4 lot subdivision Highland Terrace 1. Plan shall show location of bench marks, also contour elevations. 2. Highland Terrace drains to the north. Driveways shall each have culverts. The minimum size shall be 12 inches and plastic (not metal). 3. Water main should be extended to serve these units. Well water is poor in quality. It is high in iron and other minerals. Extending the main will also provide fire protection. 4. Extending municipal water and sewer lines require a state permit. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802,846.4101 www.sburl.com the extent they have a particularized lmerest that may be affected by theproposed pIII act tler the ten criteria. ®3. Non-partyparticipants: The district commission, its Own motion orby pe petition, may allow r by ers 10 participate in the CREATIVE SPACE a«ordedp«Y= atus 3OX30 SHARED STUDIO SPACE Summer sublet near Burlington College. High ceilings. No hre. Furnished w/ work bench, tables, shelves & parking. $500/mo. 336.407.6024. FARMERS MARKET VENDORS! Farmers Market at Creek Farm Plaza, Colchester. Every Sun. beginning May 30. Info: Tracey, 864-4908, or go to ww.olivesoilvt.com, ACT 250 NOTICE APPLICATION AND HEAR- ING #4CO893-5R 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 On April 14, 2010, Daniel Fon[dine and Michael Fontaine Flied a request for Reconsideration for the District Commission's decislon on application 94CO893 5 for a project described as partial intl- ingsunder Criterion 8(A) for a proposed 34 unit residential development located within the Current sand extraction pit. The project is located on North in Williston Road the Town of Williston. This project will be evaluated a[ the hearing by the Dlstrltl4 ySionrhaccoral cewith- ' n accortlance with 10 S V.S.A.§6086(a)(8)(A) and �- Act 250 Rule 34(E)-Bal- ancing Flexibility antl Ri i nality of Permit Conditions u (Stowe Club Highlands). A public hearing is scheduled for May 27, 2010 at 8:00 a.m. at the Essex ce Junction District Office of the Agency of Natural m Resouces, 111 West Street Vee Essex Junction, Vermont. N The following people or organizations may partici- o pate in the hearing for this project: 1. Statutory parties: The �- municipality the munici- pal planning commission. Z the regional planning w commission, any atlja[en[ nisi Patty. municipal 1e planning commissiori or regional planning commis - on if the project land. re located on a town boundary, and affected state agencies are entitled I, to party status. Cl"H 2. Adjoining property J ownersandothers: May u participate as parties to to If you wish further information regarding participation in this hear- ing,pieasecontact the District Coordinator at the address below before the data ,the first hearing or prehearing. If you have a disability for which you are going to need accommo- dation, please notify this office at least seven days prior to the above hearing data Copies ofthe application and plans for this project are available for inspection by members of the public during regular working hours at the Williston Offces, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Office, and the District #4 Environ- mental "Office . The afolica. bon can also be viewed at the Natural Resources Board web site: www.nrb. state.vtus/Iup by clicking on 'District Commission Cases' antl entering the case number above, Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 21st day of April, 2010. far the specific order in which Items will be heard. Burlington Proposed Downtown TIF District City Council Meeting Notice —June 7, 2010 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Burlington, CityCouncl will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 7, 2010 at7:00 pm in the Contois Auditorium, City Hall, Church Street to consider the fallowing: Resolution to establish and create the Downtown Tax Increment Finance (TIFJ District within the Designated Downtown, and to submit an ap- plication to the Vermont Economic Progress Councl (VEPC) to approve the TIF Oistni tpursuant to 24 VSA §1 B92, which will enable he City to incur Indebtedness to be repaid through the retention of future Incremental State and City property tax re- ceipts In support of public Infrastructure invest- ents as identifetl In the TIF District Plan. Copies of the proposed TIF District Plan and other supporting materials are available for review In he tommunity and Economic Develop- ed Office , City Hall, Room 32, during normal business hours. FIRE PROTECTION AND PREVENTION — Installation and Mainte- a That Chapter 13, Fire By:/s/Peter E. Keibel Protection and Prevention, Peter E. Keibel ofthe Codeof Ordinances Natural Resources Board of the City of Burlington Distrut #4 Coordinator be and hereby is Mended Ill West Street by amending Sec. 1354 Essex Junction, VT 05452 thereof to read as follows: T/802.879.5658 Sec. 1354. Installation and E/ peter.keibeliPstate.vtus maintenance. BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD Tuesday June 1, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The Burlington Develop. ment Review Board will held a public hearing on Tuesday June 1, 2010 at S:OOp.m. In Contois Auditorium, City Hall to consider the following applications: 1.10-0881CA/CU; 60 South Crest Drive (RL Ward 5) Bruce Baker Construct addition to existing duplex to add one Ill unit. 2, 10.0885AP: 445 South Union Street (RL, Ward 6) Gisela Thlbault Revocable Trust Appeal of Notice of Viola. tion #195874 for expanded parking area. Plans may be viewed in the Planning antl Zoning office, (City Hall, 149 Church Street, Burlington), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. This may not be he final order in which items will be heard at the meeting. Please view the final Agen- da, at www.cl.burlington. vtus/planning/drb or posted on the Planning and Zoning Office notice board, one week before the hearing The Cost of any connec- tion to the municipal fire alarm system, as well as all other costs dueto the installation of any master box, shal I be borne by the party installing the system. All installation and maintenance work on a master box and/or alarm system shall be performed by state -licensed fire alarm installers and shall be subject to the approval of the fire marshal. An Initial connection fee of $468-$$.11l shall be paid to the City by the owner of the property upon which the master box or alarm system is installed for the computer program- ming and signal strength testing by the Otys alarm technician which is required to connect the Master Radio Call Be. (MRCS) to the Burlington Emergency Communica- tion Center (BECC) . A re. programming fee of5150 shall be paid by the owner for any modification to an existing MRCB that re- quires reprogramming and Costing by the City'1 alarm technician. Any additional work required on the MRCB system other than those specified in the City's alarm technicians MACE programming guide shall be subject to a charge of $75/hr of the Clty's alarm technicians time. It shall be the property owners responsibility to maintain the master box on his premises In working condi tion and good repairatall times. 'Material stricken out deleted. Material underlined added, IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Burlington, as follows: That Chapter 13, Fire Protection and Prevention, of the Code of 0 rdlnances of he City of Burlington be and hereby Is amended by amending the proposed Ordinance Amendment of Set. 13-54 approved by the Ord hance Committee on February 9, 2010 and referred back to the City Council for Second Reading and Adoption to additionally include the amendment of Sec. 13-58 hereof to read as follows: Sec. 13-58, Annual fee. An annual fee shall be charged to the property owner In the amount of few ftyg hundred fifty dollars IS489.se$gg0,00) for each master box con. nected to the municipal fire alarm system, This charge will be assessed and collected annually, due in pro rate amount upon the effective data of this division and the first day o iy thereafter. An administrative charge and/orinterest shall be ssed for payments not received within thirty (30) days of the invoice from the Department. Service calls by the fire marshal during normal working hours shall be included inthischarge. Failure to pay he annual fees in the time required is a violation punishable under section 13.20(a). amended 04/26/10 LO lst madMil: 01/25/10: referred to the ordinance Committee 2nd reading: 04/26/10 Action: adopted Date: 04/26/10 Published: 05/05/10; re- published 05/12/10 Effective: 05126/10; actual effective date now 06/02/10 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASH- INGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING, JUVENILE DEPARTMENT IN RE THE DEPENDENCY OF: Mishaya Ann Buried Thurston DOB: 06-22.04 Alyssa May Clark Thurston DOB: 03.08-99 NO: 10-7.02008-8KNT 10-7-02009.6KNT NOTICE OF HEARING TO: Patricia Lee Thurston Burbo, mother; Kenneth David Burbo Jr, father of Mishaya; Karl Edwin Clark, father of Alyssa, and/or anyone claiming parental/ paternal rights or interest in the Children and to All Whom It May Concern: RCW 26.33,310 regarding 802-383-1234 the above named children, 802-383.1242 (F AX) whose parents are Patricia bmason®cssu.crg Lee Thurston Burbo, mother and Kenneth NOTICE David Burbo Jr, father of Mishaya; Karl Edwin Clark, The Chittenden South fatherof Alyssa. Supervisory Union, composed of Allen Brook [FOR FURTHER INFORMA- School, Charlotte Central TION, CALL 206.720.3293, School, Hinesburg 1om- 8:00a.m.-4:30 p.m.l munity School, Shelburne Community School, Said Petition will be heard Williston Central School, an June 24,2010, at the and Champlain Valley hour of 8.15 a.m., at King Union High School, hereby County Superior Court, provide the following JUvenile Department 401 notice In compliance with 4th Ave North, Kent. WA 40 CFR Part 763.93(g)f3) before a judge of the above AHERNAsbestosManage- entltledcourt,atwhich ment Plans are avallable time you are directed to atachools. appear and answer the said petition or the petl- May4,2010 tion will be granted and action will be taken by the PUBLIC HEARING court such as shal l appear SOUTHBURLINGTON to be for the welfare of the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW said children. BOARD Dated May 6, 2010. The South Burlington De- BARBARA MINER velopment Review Board will hold a public hearing KING COUNTY In the South Burlington SUPERIOR COURT CLERK City Hall Conference Room, BY: BLB, Deputy Clerk 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont an INVITATION TO BID TuesdaV. at 7:30 P.M. t consider he The Crittenden South following: Supervisory Union, herein called the Owner, Invites 1. Preliminary platapplica. separate sealed bids for a 'ion #SO.10-16ofAlElm- GAS CONVERSIONProject fortheir school In Hines- amas and Neringa Shalna to subdivide a 39,450sf burg Vermont. parcel into three (3) lots of approximately equal size, Bid documents will be available upon request Highland Terrace. from the project engineer or owner . A bidder site visit and walkthrough is scheduletl for May 19 at 3 pm. Additional Site review and walkthrough maybe arranged by the bidder by contacting the school to arrang, a site visit before bids are due. Copies of the Request for Proposal and bid documents Can be ote- mined at the office of GAP Engineering, PC: [BiViD GWRer frombMasonor at he CSSU offices In Shelburne (002) 383.1234. Bid Due Date is June 2, 2010 at 11:00 A.M. at the Office of the Superin- tendent of Schools, C/o Chittenden South Supervisory Union, 5420 Shelburne Road, Suite 300. Shelburne, Vermont 05482, Verbal and Facsimile quotes will not be accepted. Bids must besealed. Thlsisapubl!c bid opening. Questions should be directed to Bob Mason and concurrently copied to Bill Root and by mail, facsimile or in writ- ing. Answers t0 questions will be provided via email, facsimile or in writing and conveyed to all bidders The Owner reserves the right to waive any Informality in, or reject anyorallbids. Nobidder may withdraw his bid within 45 days; Saturday, Sunday and legal holidays excluded, after the bid opening. Dated this An day of May, 2010 by: You are hereby notified Bob Mason, Chief Opera. thaton Aprd 5, 2010, a tions Officer petition for Termination of Chittenden South Supervi- Parent-Child Relationship sory Union was filed In the above 5420 Shelburne Road, entitled Court, pursuant Suite 300 be RCW 13.34.080 and/or Shelburne, VT 05482 2. Conditional use applica- tion #CU-10-06 of Marga- ret Novotny to amend a previously approved plan fora 9,800sfgeneral office building. The amendment consists of converting 4,410sf to social services use, 72 Ethan Allen Drive, 3. Conditional use ap- plication #CU-10-07 of Kathleen and Thomas Easton to; l) reconstruct a single family dwelling and increase Its footprint by 50%. and 2) allow the height of the reconstruct. ad structure to exceed the 25 foot height Ilmit by 9.4ft for a total height of 34.4 It, 101 Holmes Road. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Develop- ment Review Board Copies ofthe applications are available for.publlc inspection at the South Bu rlington City Hal!. May 12, 2010 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FUNDING NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Chittenden county Transportation Authority gives notice that, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 5310 Capital for Eld er's & Persons with Disabilities Program; 49 U.S.C. § 5311 Nan - Urbanized Area Formula Program for Preventive Maintenance Program and Rural Technical Assistance Program; Assistance Program; Operating gram; Congestion Mitigation Air Duality Program; 49 U.S.C. § 5316 Job Access and Re- verse Commute Program, the opportunity is offered for a public hearing on a proposed Public Transit tlonoft!le Powerof Sale Programwith Transit se, Contained in a certa In ce to Chittenden County mortgage given bySov- a nd Commuter service ereign Bank to Matthew to Franklin, Addison, and J. Cohen dated December Washington Counties. 9,200 and recordetl in Volume 102, Page 171 of Projects are described as the Land Records ofthe follows: State Operating Town of Westford, diwhich funds in the amount of mortgage the undersigned $1,682,695; STP Proven- is the present holder, for tive Maintenancefundsin breach of the conditions of the amount of$1,795,878; as Id mortgage and for the Federal Job Access and Reverse Commute(JARC) purposes offoreclosing the same will be sold at funds in the amount of Public Auction at 12:30 $256,800; State Job P.M.on June8,2010,at Access and Reverse 1102 Old Stage Road f/k/a Commute (JARC) funds In Reynolds Road, Westford, the amount of$256,8D0; Vermont all and singular Rural Technical Assistance the premises described in Program(RTAP) funds in said mortgage: the amount of $3,000: Congestion Mitigation Air To Wit: Duality M a rketing funds In Being all and the same the amount of$50,000; landeand premises Congestion Mitigation Air conveyed to Matthew J. Quality Operating funds in Cohen by Warranty Dead the amount of$739,778; of Morton H. Reynolds Federal 5310/5311/5309/ dated August 29,7979 STP Capital funds in the and recorded in Book 53, amount If$1,111,634: Page 348-349 ofthe Land and State Capital Match Records ofthe Town of funds in the a mount of Westford. The face page $33B,954. of this deed was originally recorded In Book 42, Page Persons desiring a hearing 169 of the Land Records of be held should submit the Town of Westford. written requests to the Chittenden County Trans- Terms of Sale: $10,000.00 portation Authority and to be paid in cash by to the Vermont Agency purchaser at the time of of Transportatio n at the as le, with the be lance due addresses below with in 14 acclosing. Proofoffnanc- days ofpublicat—of this Ingforthebalanceofthe otice n. Upon a receipt of purchase to be provided request atlata will be at the flubs ofsa le. The scheduled a no a notice of sale is subject to taxesdue hearing will be published. and owing to the Town of A copy afthe proposal may Westford, be seen at the Project Co. ord'mi Office. Persons The mortgagor is entitled des[fill g to make written to redeem the prom [ses at comments should forward any b m e on, r to the ear Is same to the addresses by paying lh a hut l amount below within 14 days of publication of this notice. due under the mortgage, Including the costs and A Copy ofthe application expenses ofthe sale. for the Federal grants may be seen at the Project Other terms to be an - Managers Office. nounced at the sale or Inquire at Lobe & Fortin, Transit Provider: 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306, South Burlington, VT Chittenden County Trans. 05403, 802 660.9000. portation Authority IS Industrial Parkway DATED atSouth Burling. Burlington, VT05401 ton, Vermont this 6th day of May, 2010, State Agency: Vermont Agency of Trans- Sovereign Bank portation Public Transit Section By: Joshua B. Lobe, Esq. 1 National Life Building Lobe & Fortin, PLC Montpelier. VT 05633- 30Kimbal]Ave.,Ste.306 5001 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dated at Burlington, County of Chittenden, STATE OF VERMONT State of Vermont thi s 6 CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. day of May, 2010, CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT Aaron Frank DOCKET NO. S07ZI.09 CnC Director of Planning and Program Development Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Plaintiff STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Edward P. Myers, Colleen CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR Myers f/k/a Colleen COURT M. Roberts, William DOCKET NO. S0155-09 CnC Harry Pelkey, Colleen May Sovereign Bank, Pelkey, NorthCountry Federal Credit Union, Plaintiff United States ofAmerica V. Secretary of Housing and Matthew J. Cohen, Urban Development State Colchester Community of Vermont Department Development Corporation of Taxes, Burlington News And Occupants residing at Agency, Unifun CCR Part. 1102 Old Stage Road ners And Occupants resid- f/k/a Reynolds Road, West- ing at 126 Hedgerow Drive ford, Vermont f/k/a 7 Hedgerow Drive, Defendants Shemume, Vermont Defendants NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and in execu. May 13, 2010 Douglas And Elain Maynes 9 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 45 Highland Terrace Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, YJ,,ZaBeagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Corset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846,4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.corn PLANNING & ZONING May 13, 2010 Gardner Construction PO Box 21 Colchester, VT 05446 Re: 45 Highland Terrace Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Corset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846,4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.,,hud.corn �� �0, southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD- � 6 - _ 4 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW X Preliminary ❑ Final PUD Being Requested? ❑ Yes XNo All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Namee as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) +��aimr�n S �Pr�v�aa �'�-r.�f� 25 S6 e. &,n 1�cw-2 � V7 oS,4gS Ceti .,fin Q % 355 - 811915 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 310-311 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Oro 7�F�F a. Contact email address: Gmccc�n�mcco.�ca-+��, , mn 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: I46-10 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) bgSO_ C'Xt)115 Subdivison Plat Application 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): ' j kae 14 b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): ;c eni,� 11�ree rww cips once-5. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and exi ting buildings to remain): e e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): I ��7 f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): CI� Y ""o fPS'JeI U106 g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): r1% h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. n.)nA 2 Subdivison Plat Application 9. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: p.V-1- ccre5 �3�,�f � s.0 (acres /sq. ft.) b. Building Coverage: Existing square feet % Proposed i`S(ao square feet Q . % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 0 square feet % Proposed W square feet I). :f- % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed n a square feet % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? ❑ Yes ')� No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: SQ. FT. *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 Subdivison Plat Application 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 1 6D b. Landscaping: $ Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) "� ';�> 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): er,c� b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: A /01 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 0 I C'N 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 16. PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach on a separate sheet. See a 2 Subdivison Plat Application 17. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: vii ccwi ui riai n ui 1y a Z_ui nny ur uesiynee 5 Algimantas & Neringa Shalna Parcel 0850-00045 Adjoining Landowners Parcel Adioiner 0850-00009 Douglas W. & Elaine Maynes 9 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0850-00030 Gardner Construction P.O. Box 21 Colchester, VT 05446 0850-00040 John W. & Patricia A. Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01405 Homer L. & Marie J. Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01440 Judith M. Lavanway 1440 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01450 Thaddeus McDougal & Jamie Fratamico 1450 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Y:Troj ects\26's\26103\2009\Town\Adjoine .doc McCain Consulting, Inc. Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting April 30, 2010 Ray Belair South Burlington Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Application for 3-Lot Subdivision, Preliminary Review Shama Property, Highland Terrace, South Burlington McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Ray, Enclosed please find the following information in support of the above referenced project: 1. A complete Preliminary Review application 2. A fee check in the amount of $813.00 (eight hundred thirteen dollars) 3. A list of adjoining landowners 4. Five (5) 24" x 36" copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy of the site plans (Sheets S-1 through S-3 and SW-1, all dated 4/26/10) 5. Five (5) 18" x 24" copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy of the survey (Sheet 1 of 1, dated 4/28/10) I believe this is all you need. Please contact us when the date for Preliminary Review has been determined. Thank you and please feel free to call with any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, McCain Consult' , Inc. Nicole Fitch : Project Administrator Enc. Cc: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, w/ enclosures V•\Prni—c \')A's\26103\2009\Town\Town Pmhm.doc 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 • Waterbury, VT 05676 • (802) 244-5093 Tel. • (802) 244-7492 Fax 0860-01405 Homer & Marie Dubois I I I 0860-01425 Joseph & Lisa Malley I I N/F 9! Homer & Marion o Dubois o I50/415 IV IPF 8" reveal 0860-01444) Judith Lavanway 297/442-443 '� I pinched, no cap I I .. Underground I ® pumphouse I" IPF flush ( _L 5 8T28'01" E no cap )" IRF 11' reveal -- bent & loose 199v89' �_ no ca P 250.70''-�-. Parcel 1 I ^ - r ------ Apple l� 31,180 sq.ft. 11'312 Parcel 2A------- i I Existin9�-- I Z 13,2�"s0 sq.ft. � L - — — Building envel I Driveway 18" Apple ti-i: — — — oPe w ---i- _N 87�753- W — nI 10' wide utility I w 249.32' — — — - - v easement per 34/324 A (O 24" Maple I i� f— — — — — — — —L N d =lExistingl IN ° I Parcel 2B v 3 o ° rz: Drilled I"S Existing Shed Hedge I 13, 1J`0 sq.ft. We I n.� House ❑ I Z 9 I 30" Maple I L' — — Building envelope I y I � — -.. — — S 8771'59" E I w 24" Ash Parcel 2 l C 24z95' — ' p roximale ° — — — 41"reved 13,070 $q.f t. 1 15" Maple30" Maple �� (6) 12" Red Pine Row1N 86'48'34" W — ° L` — _ Building envelope20'200.24 — _N 86'ST15" Wpat wide recreation 1" IPF 4" reveal 246.59' path easement `except within no cap5'radius of noexisting drilled wellno p a I vrS I 0850-00009 Douglas & Elaine I Moynes 392/578-579 LEGEND �j )F Iron rod to be set with cop marked "VAN IDERSTINE 719" OIron pipe found OO Iron rod found 0 Calculated point Utility pole — — Property line — Right -of -Way line — — — — — — — Easement line a Wooden fence - x x - Barbed wire fence line - r/r / - Overhead utility wires 1� Tree line 36/792 Book 36 Page 792 of the Land Records GRAPHIC SCALE o 20 40 e0 'w ( IN FEET ) 1 iuch = 40 ft. SOUTH BURLINGTON,�IVT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE Received for recorTdTT��O,�{TR��TT �DDA.D. 20 at _LbbELl1Y11N AR , and recor ledKE A� Tf' Attest: Town Clerk FOR PRELIMINARY 0 .o 0 I I I I 0850-00040 John & Patricia Tnrior I V TITLE SOURCE: South Burlington Land Records Warranty deed of Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller to Algimantas Shalna and Neringa Shalna, Book 754, Page 310-311, Doted 30 June, 2006. REFERENCES: 1) A plat entitled "Survey of the Lands of Alg'enantas & Neringa Shalna, South Burlington, Vermont, scale 1" = 40'; by McCain Consulting, Inc., dated January 8, 2008, revised April 8, 2008, obtain from McCain Consulting, Inc. 2) A plan entitled "Tract Plan - Hinesburg Rood, South Burlington, Vermont, Properly of Christian B. Hoskam Jr. & Hazel G. Hoskom," scale 1" = 100', dated June 17, 1957, recorded Map Slide 19.5 of the South Burlington Land Records. 3) A plan entitled "Plan of Land belonging to C.B. Hoskam, South Burlington, VL" scale 1" = 40'. by James R. Ogden, doted July 26, 1969, recorded Map Slides 93 and 93.1 of the South Burlington Land Records. 4) Protective covenants in re: Country Gorden Development, dated June 19. 1957. recorded Book 34. Page 324 of the of the South Burlington Land Records. NOTES: 1) This map is based on the research of the South Burlington Land Records, physical evidence found and a total station traverse with a minimum precision ratio that meets the standards for urban surveys, set by the Vermont State Board of Land Surveyors Rules effective October 11, 1999, performed by Keith R. Van Iderstine and Scott A, Hozle in March, 2007. 2) There is included with Parcel 1 a right to water as described in a warranty deed of Roland E. Peterson, doing business as Peterson Construction Company, to Helen Puffer as well as rights to water as described in a water rights agreement from Merril and Hilda Gave to Helen B. Puffer, Dated October 31, 1957 and recorded in Book 34, Page 38 of the South Burlington Land Records. 3) Parcel 1 is subject to a 10 foot wide utility easement as per the protective covenants in re: Country Gardens Development, doled June 19, 1957 and recorded in Book 34, Page 324 of the South Burlington Land Records. 4) Except where otherwise noted, no attempt was made to identify and/or locate any easements or rights -of -way that may exist, either recorded or unrecorded. The Hinesburg Road (Vermont Route 116) right-of-way is assumed to be 4 rods wide and the Highland Terrace (Town Highway #146) riot -of -way is listed as sixty (60) feet wide in the South Burlington Road Index. 5. This subdivision is subject to the provisions of the following permits: Town Subdivision Permit PENDING. Construction General Permit PENDING, Operational Stormwater Permit PENDING, 6. The stormwater pond easements depicted herein ore for access, inspection and maintenance of said ponds according to the State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Operational Stormwater Permit PENDING. 7) Bearings are based on Magnetic North, as observed by McCain Consulting, Inc., in March, 2007. 8) Research by Keith R. Van Iderstine. Mop by Scott J. Herring. RECEIVED APR 3 0 2010 City of So. Burlington Location Map gfht- � u,.. , 6 �i- ROJEC y+ q SURVEY AND SUBDIVISION OF THE LANDS OF ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA Vermont Route 116 & Highland Terrace South Burlington, Vermont HEARING SCALE 1" = 40' McCAIN CONSULTING, INC. PROJECT : Mc2610 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET DRAWING: 26103sv 4-28-10.DWG Keith R. Van Iderstine, LS. 719 WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 DATE: April 28, 2010 SHEET 1 OF 1 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Work to be Dane AFumish and install opproximalely 1028 feel of 8 inch SDR 35 PVC sewer line. iFurnish and Install tar (4) concrete manholes in grade. C. Locate ON underground utilities and structures necessary to do the work. D. Notify the Eng-, in adwnce whenever as existing pipeline conflicts with .the proposed locations at the work. E. Perform as necessary thesis to show satisfactory installation of the project canponents. Perform project startup. 1.2 Submittals Required A. The conlroctor awl submil a complete construction schedule which will ndude the start and finish dales of the work items in Section 1.1 and Inking requirements in Section 4.0. B. Submit monulrw:Mer's al sheets for all piping to be installed. C. GumanlGe: The Canlraclm shall provide a written guronlee to replace any defective part a parts supplied. including labor, without charge far me (1) year starting from the dale of the inspection and start-up. 2.0 PRODUCTS 2.1 Mot"" - G_71 A. All pipe dslive ed to the jab site shall be clearly marked at the foclary with the doss of ppe, the ar Deturer's identification, and all else as required by the codes, standards and specifications referred to udder this section. Omission al this information will be cause for rejection of pipe. B. Caps and Plugs - Wol.tigh( and producing the same joint conditions as the pipe an which the cap r plug is placed C. Foundation - Except as otherwise specified fa specific piping materials, Crushed slme foundation material shall eanfarm to the requirements of Type C fit in specified. 2.2 PVC Sewer Pipe A. Sewer ppe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM Specikicotion 3034 tar SDR 35 pipe. B. The pipe shah be colored green for in -ground identification of sew. pipe. C_ Provisions must be mode for construction and expansion at each pint with a rubber ring. The bell shall consist of m integral wall section with a solid cross-section rubber ring, factory assembled, sacin p urely locked lace to prevent displacement during assembly. 2.3 Precast Concrete Manholes A. Concrete monbdes wd be built to ASTM Specificu(ion C748-88 B. Concrete shill be 4000-PSI concrete. 28-day strength. C. Sled renfwcrq shah meel ASTM specifications 0.12 sq. in. per vertical Iurl. O. Flexible monlde sleeves fa sew. pipe Connections shall conlorm to ASTM Specification C-923. E. Sealant between concrete sections and frames shall be a minimum I -inch butyl joint molunl meeting the requrements of ASTM Specificolim C-990, F. Materials used it hm oes and tours OWN meet w exceed ASTN Specification A48-76, Class 30. G. Ladder is to be sled reinforced copolymer propoleyne. 2.4 FBI Mamas A, Type A - Crushed Gravel - Crushed grovel shall consist of hand, shop, clean material, It shall be free from any considerable amount of flat, lumimled or elangated particles and shall be free from shells, clay, limestone, dolomitic materials, shale ar other deleterious molter. The crushed sloe or gravel shall be supplied , armed as follows: Screen or Sieve Size Percent Passing by Weight 2 nch. too -yEinches 90 Io 100 N. 4 30 o 60 Na too 0 to 12 No. 200 0 to 6 B. Type B - Sond 1. Sind shall be dean, hard. durable, uncurled particles of quartz or other rock, free from lumps of day, soft or flaky nrdral, loan, organic or other deleterious material. In no case shall sand containing lumps of frozen material be used. 2. Sand shall contain not more than 3 percent finer than No. 200 sieve, using AASHTO Method T-ill. 3. Sand shall be uubrmly groded from Cowse to fine and shall meet the following grodaLim requirements: Screen ar Sieve Sue Percent Passing by Weight inch 100 318 inch 85 l0 100 No. 4 60 to 100 No. 16 35 to 80 No. 50 10 to 55 No 100 2 to 10 4. The above gradetiun represents the extreme limits, which shall determine wilobiity lair use son all sources of Supply The gradation from my one scarce shall be reasonable, wiloom and not subject to the extreme percentages of gradalim specified above. C Type C - Coln FRI 1. Type C Common Fit shall be clean, free from lumps of frozen materal, clay, soft w flaky material, loam, organic or other deleterious material. 3.0 EXECUTION 11 Pipe Installation - General A. Unless otherwise specified in These specificotims. on the drowngs, r directed by the Engineer, provide making and. the pipe of a minimum of six inches of Type B Saint kill far oll option B. Install pipe and iltrgs so Thal there it be no deviation at the pinks and so that inverts present a murkh surface_ Pipe and fillings, which do not fit together to tam a light filling joint are not permitted. C. Whenever pipes require oultng. a whed outer, hyouulk pipe cutter or pipe saw, satisfactory to the Engineer shall be used. Cutting pipes with a cold chisel m cold cull. will not be allowed. D. Install Ponin the locations and to the required lines and grades as Blimp an the plans, using an approved method of control. E. Maintain the ex4'awlinn free of water during the progress of the wok. No pipes sholl be laid o water, nor shall there be any pints mode up in water. No separate allowance for pumping or otherwise removing water will be mode. AN slides or cove -ins of the trenches or cuts shall be remedied at the expense of the Contractor and to the satisfaction of the Engineer. for Monton Chinatown of installed pipe and fitting ate ids throughout the work. Plug ends where DD 99 Done nslallolion Is not in progress. Drainage of construction excavations Through new pipes is prohibiletl. G. Preparatory to mooing pipe pals, all suffoces of the portions of the pipe to be pinked, or of the factory mode jointing material, shot he clean and dry. No waiting of the pipes will be permitted in o wet trench or wet excavator. Gaskets, lubricants, primers, odhedves. etc., shop be installed and used as recommended by the pipe r pint momfocturr s speciltcalims. Gaskets and other jointing moleriols shall be protected from damage at all tines. Gaskets and 'Pinking molerMs Shah be inspected before inslellatkn of the pipe, sa m and my loe proi affixed gaskets and pinking materials shop be removed and replaced to the salisfoctian of Um Engineer . The pipe shall be aligned with the previously installed pipe, and the pint shall be inspected to be sure the, the pint has been properly made and is tight. IL while ranking the aid, the gasket or pinking motern. become Imse or misplaced. the pipe shall be removed and the pint remode to the satisfaction of the Engineer. The pals shall be made in a workmanlike manner so as to obtain the degree of water tightness required H. Firmly compact backl11 material around the pipe. Cover the pipe and compact by hand r mechanical tamping to o point 12 rMRs above the top of the pipe. The bolonce of the backMl to the lop al the trench shall be cmpacled by mechanical Lumping ar by means of vibrolors, sub Reel to the approval of the Engineer. Jetting and Puddling may be permitted with the approval of the Engineer only, and in compliance with the voiaus other Sections of These specificnlions. 3.2 Sew. Line r Farce Man and Water Line Crossovers A. Sewer r famore, force mocrossing wan. Ines shall be laid beneath The water fine with at least 18' of verticalseporalion. If the sewer line must be laid obove the wafer line, then: 1. The sewer must be crsWcted to suite line standards (ASTM D2241 for SDR 26 pipe) (a a minimum dnslrce of 20 feel to either side of the water line, 2. The crossing Rival be arranged sic that one full length of sewer line is centered over the water line, 4.0 TESTING 4.1 Testing Buried Non -Pressure Pipe k General: I. Tests shall be conducted by, and at the expense oL the Contractor under direction of the Eagnow. Tests shall be continued until d leaks have been made light to the satisfaction of the Engineer. 2. Conduct tests ofter trench is backfilled. B. Gravity Lines: I. nfibolk" - Tesl the Ines for nfilbotion by measuring the flow in the campsled line. Measuring instruments and the shall be provided by the Contractor. No infiltration shut be acceptable. If any joint shows leakage it shell be repared. 2. Exfdlralm - Tied the Ines for exfltmtim by hydrostatic or air lest. The hydrmtotic water tests shah consist of: o. Minimum of 2 thee: of head ow upstream end. ban Minimum of 6 feel of head ow downstream end. can Adjust head otter me hour. d. Measure loss of water during next hour. e. No exl1tration will be acceptable. 3. EFfilration testing by pressurized arc shill be according to the Ramscier procedure and the following: D. Hold 4.0 psi greater than average groundwater back pressure with no pressure drop far 10 minutes. WATER NOTES Water Supply Bads of Deign (AN Loi a) Averaqe day demand = 4 bedroom house ® 490 gad b) Maximum day demand (gpm) = 0.68 c) Instmlonems pm) peak demand (g= 5 gpm d) Source capacity = to be determined e) Storage capacity = not required far Single family residence f) Pump capacities = to be determined g) Operating pressure ranges = 30 50 psi h) Reference to the flaodpiam = this project is not in the Nooiplam Water Supply Wdl: 1) asloll well in the locolion shown an the plan. 2) Provide well driller's log. 3) Provide well driler's certification as specified below. Inspections and Certifications: 1) It is the owners/ cmlroclor's responsibility to contact the consultant for the (dlowng: a) For stakeout of the well locations. 2) The well'ARler will provide the consultant with a signed and dated statement as follows: T hereby certify that the inslaflatim-reloled information Submitted is true and correct, and that in the exercise of my reasonable professknd judgment, the potable wan. Supply has been installed in accordance with the permitted design and of permit conditions, was inspected, was properly tested, and has successfully met those performance tests. 3) The certification of construction in required by section 1-308(a) of the Environmental Protection Roles may not be provided by the designer if the procedures oullned herm are not followed TOTAL DEPTH AS PER FLANS RPM AS PER PUN, COARSE GRANULAR BACKELL 4 0 FOOT MNNAN 4' POP NAILADON DRECTLY 010 PIPE "HERE BURIAL IS LESS MAN 4-1/2 FEET uNlNal COVER N- SDR 35 PVC OVER PIPE IS TO BE 2C SEVER TINE Y \ PIPE TO BE BEDDED a' IN W CRUSHED STONE �I SEWER TRENCH DETAIL (NOT TO SCAM USE 30' HEAVY DUTY CAST ROM MARE AND COMER wM ELASTOYER RNC MARKED SEVEI' MANHOLE (NOT TO SCALE) �HYDRANT - oo OR KE NE PAGER DIAL OR KENNEDY GUARDIAN ,ALL HEM OUTLETS TO R wATER-TIGHT. USE RUBBER GASKETS ExiERNR OF MANHOLE 91ELL TO BE BINMNWS COATED. WN INW RIN 1 171. 14 4%N t 114.It 44e.d d 1'II dD 44 11 4 *a 43t Be i.." OF './4- CRUSHED STONE BOX AND COVER )RAIN HOLE A RVICE VALVE ANCHOR ROD 9* DUCTILE IRON If 1WATER MAIN 6' WATER LINE FIRE HYDRANT (NOT TO SCALE) UNDISTURBED EARTH (MINIMUM 1 SGUARE FOOT OF CONTACT AREA) HYDRANT 000' a pOo is i ooc o° °o 00 0 FELT PAPER BETWEEN PIPE AND CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS NOT TO SCALE RESILIENT WEDGE VALVE WATER -SEWER LINE SEPARATION NOTES A. HOT zoola Seporobon. I. Sewers shall be laid at least to feet horizontally from my Co existing m proposed water on The distance shall be measured edge to edge 2. Where impossible or impractical, due (o ledge, boulders a other unusual conditions. to maintain the Ten toot sewer -water pipe horizontal separation between se_ and valor Ines. the walk line cook, be In a momenta reach or r r mdieturbed earth shelf in the sewer tench provided that the bottom of the .to the is a( least 18 inches above the tap of the sew.. Wherever impossible or imprac(kol to maintain the 18 inch vertical separation, the sewer line shall be constructed to normol water line standards and pressure tested to 50 psi for 2 hours prior, to backUing. No leakage shall be allowed far this test. SITE TECHNICIAN: GUNNER MCCAIN B-237 CaIISE WANW� BAa3tL N7 CMI 1E0 STONE (ROA) J• DDNaNIL SDE B'SDR35M- SEVER lWE �- N' -1 SEWER TRENCH WITH UNDER DRAIN PIPE DETAIL (NDE TO SOME) 4' PERFORATED PVC PIPE RDpyABLE CAP FTNDI 10 BE SAME 92E k MATERIAL AS 9EEW TD Y RPM SEVER LIE RPM AS REOURED 45' DBaIT 5'WE ME ALL rs r�-- wrE CRYHCRUI N0TEY 1. PVC PIPE IS TO MEET ASTM D"-DR35. 2. PUSH ON JOINTS TO MEET ASTM 03212. SEWER CLEAN-OIJLSE�j C E I V E D (NOT TO _s_sfflililb��d� {{LL..���_ B. Crossings - I. Sewer Crossing water mans shall be laid beneath the water man with at least 18 inches vertsd clearance between the outside of the sever and the outside of the role, man. 2 When if is impossible to maintain the 18 inch verlkd separation, the crossing shall be arranged so Thal me lull length of sewer pipe is centred above r below the water line with sewer pints as nor as Possible from walr pin - 3. The sewer ppe must be constructed to the rota main sbodards lair a minimum distance of 20 feel either side of the crossing or a total of three ppe lengths, whichever is greater. 4. The section constructed to water mom slmdrds most be pressure tested to maintain 50 psi for 2 hours without leakoga prior to backfll'm9 beyond one Iurl above the pipe to wily walk tightness. 5. Where a water men crosses Under a seer, adequate structural support shell be prodded Ion the sewer to prevent damage to the water man, and the Oinks of the sewer line shall be encased in concrete. MAY 2 6 2010 City of So. Burlington WATER UNE SEWER LINE O O 18 MINIMUM 18` MINIMUM SEWER LINE WATER LINE WATER -SEWER CROSSING (NOT TO SCALE) ARRANGE PIPES TO MAXIMIZE DISTANCE BETWEEN CROSSING AND PIPE JOINTS. SEE WATER -SEWER LINE SEPERATION NOTES WATER/WASTEWATER SPECIFICATIONS & DETAILS ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA THREE LOT SUBDIVISION HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT SCALE : NTS McCAIN CONSULTING, INC. DESIGNED BY: GNII PROJECT g26103 DRAWN BY: WEIR 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET CHECKED BY: GNM WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 DATE: APRIL 26, 2010 SHEET S-3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: May 24, 2010 drb\sub\shalna\shalna_3lotPrelim.doc Plans received: April 30, 2010 45 HIGHLAND TERRACE— 3-LOT SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-10-16 Agenda #7 Meeting date: June 1, 2010 Owner/Applicant Algimantas & Neringa Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Contact Person Property Information Gunner McCain Tax Parcel 0850-00045 McCain Consulting Inc SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 93 South Main Street 0.91 acres Waterbury, VT 05676 Location Map i ' rf /J +ft.. F CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotPrelim PROJECT DESCRIPTION Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking sketch plan review to subdivide a 39, 450 sq. ft. parcel into three (3) lots of 13,983 sq. ft. (lot 2A), 12,746 sq. ft. (lot 2) and 12,746 sq. ft. (lot 2C), 45 Highland Terrace. The sketch plan application was reviewed on October 20, 2009 and November 3, 2009 (minutes attached). Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on April 30, 2010 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Neighborhood Residential ZoningDistrict Requirement/Limitation Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 12,746 SF sity-NR 1.2 units/acre base density max of 4/acre with TDR 3.3 units/acre** in Covera e FMax. 15% ** l Covera e 30% Setback 30 ft. ** Min. Side Setback 10 ft. ** Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. ** 416 The acreage of the lot will not support a home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. Only one dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of at least two additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). ** The application does not propose actual structures. Actual structures will be sited on the lots as part of a zoning permit. This application seeks only to create the lots and general layout for the dwelling units within a building envelope. The concept plan remains within the coverage limitations of the district. The Board should review the proposed building envelopes. 1. Only one dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of at least two additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The purchase of the development right documents must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to recording the mylar. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sublshalna\shalna 31otPrelim The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast Quadrant. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Southeast Quadrant District This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district Therefore it is subject to the Provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning District. A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ- NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub- district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. 3. The structures shall not exceed the height limitations of the district. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels The proposed lots would consume the majority of what is already a small lot. There are very little opportunities for open space on this small lot. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable sub -district allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. The proposed subdivision is in compliance with this criterion with the exception of the density limitations noted above. Additional units may be permitted on the subject lots with the appropriate transfers of development right(s). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drblsub\shalnalshalna 31otPrelim (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. Again, there are no natural areas or open spaces proposed on this small lot. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 4. Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. There are no wetlands or streams on the subject property. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. This criterion is not applicable to this application. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. The preliminary plat plans detail the proposed water and sewer connections, which have been reviewed by the City Engineer and Superintendent of the Water Department. Comments are dated May 27, 2010 from Justin Rabidoux, Director of Public Works. 5. The applicant shall comply with the comments of the Director of Public Works, per the memo dated May 27, 2010. Where necessary, the plans shall be changed prior to final plat application. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotPrelim (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. Hinesburg Road is included among several corridors on the Official City Map for a proposed recreation path. Several properties along the road have already dedicated easements to the City. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee previously reviewed the plans for the adjacent lot on Hinesburg Road and an easement is now included on that property. Nothing further is necessary for this property. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. No additional recreation paths or sidewalks are necessary as part of this application. (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated May 26, 2010 (attached). He does not recommend any changes. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. Staff finds no need to design the road so as to serve adjacent properties (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. This criterion is not applicable in this application. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotPrelim 9.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. The proposed development is too small to warrant such blocks. Staff recommends a waiver of this criterion. (2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 400 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. There are no opportunities to connect in a meaningful way to adjacent properties. (4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. The lots meet this criterion. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and 9-9 below. (2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sublshalna\shalna 3lotPrelim (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. (4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4) The applicant is not proposing any on -street parking. Staff does not recommend any on -street parking. (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5). This criterion is not applicable to this application. (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. There are no new roads proposed. All three lots will have access directly from Highland Terrace. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets). The applicant has only provided building envelopes at this time. As such, this criterion should be made a condition of approval. The buildings must bear a close relationship to Highland Terrace, and shall face the street. 6. The houses shall be located within the proposed building envelopes and shall face Highland Terrace. (2) Building Fagades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 31otPrelim The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed dwelling units. The Board should discuss this. (3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings should be set back fifteen feet (15') from the back of sidewalk. There are no sidewalks proposed in the development, but the building envelopes are proposed to the fronts of the lots. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. It is unclear if porches, stoops, or balconies are proposed. Again, the applicant should address this with the Board at the hearing. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. It is unclear if this is being met. Again, the applicant should address this with the Board at the hearing. 7. Garages must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. (6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing types. There are several pieces of the SEQ design criteria which do not appear to be met as part of this proposal. The Board should discuss whether they wish to enforce the SEQ design criteria, in part or in whole, on this application. 8. The Board shall discuss whether they wish to enforce the SEQ residential design criteria on the proposed subdivision. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board discuss the issues of residential design criteria and impose restrictions to be including in the findings of fact and administered at the time zoning permits are sought for each lot. Respectfully submitted, athyan�/LaRose—AICP,'Associate`Planner Copy to: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, applicants South�urlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Fax (802) 846-4125 May 26, 2010 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Shalna — Highland Terrace Dear Ray: I have reviewed the plans dated May 5, 2010 for the proposed 3 lot subdivision on Highland Terrace. Original discussions relative to this property/plan did not include the installation of a new fire hydrant on Highland Terrace, so I had therefore recommended that the structures have residential sprinkler systems installed. This newest set of plans shows the installation of a new fire hydrant a little less than half way between the new structures and Dubois Drive. I have scaled out the new plan which places the fire hydrant +/- 250 feet from the proposed structures. If these changes are acceptable to the South Burlington Water Department then the installation of the new hydrant would be a reasonable alternative to installing the residential sprinkler systems. Should you have any additional questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, CQ Douglas S. Brent Chief of Fire and EMS 001 southburlington P U B L I C WO R KS MEMO To: Cathyann LaRose From: Justin Rabidoux, Director Date: May 27, 2010 Re: #SD-10-16 — Algimantas and Neringa Shalna — Highland Terrace Public Works staff reviewed plans for the referenced project (plans entitled "Algimantas and Neringa Shalna, Three Lot Subdivision", dated 4/26/10 and 4/01/10 and prepared by McCain Consulting, Inc.) and has the following comments to offer. 1. Based on the parcel sizes on Sheet SW-1, the entire site is less than 1 acre. Therefore, it is safe to assume that this project will not need State of Vermont stormwater permits. The applicant should confirm this. 2. There is a note on the site plans that says, "Stormwater Easement". Is this meant to be to the City? The City does not accept maintenance responsibility for commercial stormwater treatment facilities or residential stormwater treatment facilities that do not have a State permit (i.e., less than 1 acre of impervious). 3. We are concerned with the current drainage plan for the bio-retention areas. The proposed plans show that the bio-retention areas draining into the road underdrain beneath Highland Terrace. Road underdrain is typically considered part of the road infrastructure. Typically, road underdrain is connected to stormwater basins and large treatment/detention practices are also direct piped to structures. This ensures that we have proper access to pipes so that facilities can be maintained in the future. Also, the proposed plans indicate that the underdrain is to be replaced (assumed with equivalent, what is currently in place?), but other notes appear to imply the existing underdrain is to remain and be hooked into by the proposed project — please have the applicant clarify. 4. The drainage pipe for the southernmost bio-retention area has a bend in it. For maintenance purposes, it is preferable for this pipe to be straight. 5. Bio-retention areas should be designed to the standards in the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual. The applicant should confirm that this is the case. 6. The location and size (bottom width) of grass channel(s) should be more clearly defined. 7. If the bio-retention areas are to be connected as per a plan detail on Sheet SW-1, than this connecting pipe should be shown on the site plan on the same sheet. Also, a pipe material and size should be specified. 8. All culverts under driveways shall be 18" minimum. 9. The Grass Channel detail on sheet SW-1 references Erosion Control Matting Detail, which is not in the plans. 10. Are the driveways proposed to be paved? 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.658.7961 fax 802.658.7976 www.sburl.com Physical Address: 104 Landfill Road South Burlington j 11. What elevations are the Bioretention Pond Outlets to be set at, and what is the relation between that elevation and the crest for each BioPond? 12. The plan shall show location of bench marks and contour elevations. 13. Will the houses have footing drains? Is so, where will the outlet/connect to? 14. All work within the Highland Terrace ROW requires an excavation permit from the Department of Public Works. 15. There is no detail for restoration of road or road trench. Based on the proposed manhole locations, road excavations would be required. Please provide detail. 16. Add the following to the end of note 2.2.A. on page S-3, "and conform to State Standards for Sewer Pipe". 17. All manhole covers shall be 26" diameter. 18. Standard Pipe Detail — What material is proposed in the area labeled "Minimum Cover Over is to be 24""? Pipe cover shall be 1/21) above pipe. 19. We do not approve of the detail showing the sewer line and the underdrain sharing the same trench. We have enough problems with INI without inviting it. 20. Manhole Detail — Since elevations are known, the applicant should provide a manhole detail with booted connections and a poured trough. 21. Where does the storm drain at STA 8+45 LT drain to? Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact our office with any questions. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 OCTOBER 2009 PAGE 2 unit, 670 Nowland Farm Road: and 5. Site Plan Application #SP-09-76 of Steve and Jennifer Heroux to construct a 1065 sq. ft. detached accessory structure for use as an accessory residential unit, 670 Nowland Farm Road: Mr. Snyder said they are requesting to build a "pool house" with a residential unit (bedroom, bathroom & kitchen included). He said the applicants are aware of the regulations that apply to accessory residential structures. Mr. Belair said staff had no issues. Mr. Young asked if the accessory unit could ever be subdivided from the property. Mr. Belair said it could not. The applicant just merged the properties in order to have enough land to accommodate a pool and tennis court. Ms. Quimby moved to close the hearing and to approve Conditional Use Application #CU-09-09 and Site Plan Application #SP-09-76 of Steve and Jennifer Heroux subject to the stipulations in the draft motion, with the understanding that the draft motion will be reviewed by the DRB when available. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. (Mr. Belair noted that due to illness in the Planning Department, draft motions are not available at this meeting) Mr. Behr resumed the Chair of the Board. 6. Final Plat Application #SD-09-44 of Technology Park Partners to amend a previously approved 15-lot subdivision. The amendment consists of adjusting the boundary lot lines of 113 Kimball Avenue and 10 Community Drive: Mr. Meenan explained that one of the original conditions of approval was that the applicant would widen the existing Community Drive. In 2006, that was done. The proposed application will make it easier for vehicles to pull in and out of Community Drive. Mr. Belair suggested that the applicant be required to provide the entire subdivision plan with a revision to show this change. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-09-44 of Technology Park Partners subject to the stipulations in the draft motion, with the understanding that the draft motion will be reviewed by the DRB when available. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Sketch Plan Application of Algimantas and Neringa Shalna to subdivide a 39,475 sq. ft. parcel into three lots of 13,983 sq. ft. (lot 2A), 12,746 sq. ft. (lot 213) and 12,746 sq. ft. (lot 2C), 45 Highland Terrace: DEVELOPMENT REVIE)BOARD 20 OCTOBER 2009 PAGE 3 Mr. Belair noted this is one lot of a 2-lot subdivision, and the request is to subdivide this one lot into three lots. Mr. McCain said each lot would be about 1/3 of an acre. He noted there would be some variations from the Southeast Quadrant regulations because this is an infill project. He felt that what they are proposing fits with what exists in the area. Mr. Belair noted that the Fire Chief may require the 3 buildings to have sprinklers. Mr. Behr said he would like to see the applicant follow the SEQ design guidelines for residential buildings. Mr. Knudsen and Mr. Birmingham agreed. Members agreed this could be done at the administrative level. Mr. Stuono was concerned with the layout of the lots and whether they face Highland Terrace or the private drive. Mr. Belair said the house in the rear should be oriented to the private street. Mr. McCain noted that Mr. Shalnar needs to pick up 2 TDRs in order to do this project. Mr. Belair said he would have to purchase TDRs for lots 2 & 3 before building permits for those lots could be pulled. The sending lot must also be surveyed. Mr. Abrams, a neighbor, said what is being proposed doesn't seem to fit with what is there from the standpoint of scale. He said it seems they are "stuffing in" dwellings. He added that he would like to see the trees in the city's right-of-way retained. Mr. Belair suggested that be taken up with the Public Works Dept. Mr. Behr noted this is a "receiving" area and there is a potential for 4 houses per acre. Mr. Lavanway, also a neighbor, said he was concerned with drainage. He said that as it is now, his land doesn't dry out until August. Mr. McCain said they would use the city's storm water drainage. Mr. Knudsen said the applicant will have to engineer the site so as not to increase runoff onto Mr. Lavanway's property. Mr. Maynes, another neighbor, asked if the applicant will use city water and sewer. Mr. Belair said city sewer is proposed. Mr. McCain said they are also looking at extending the water line and adding a fire hydrant. Mr. Maynes asked if there would be any obligation for neighbors to participate in the water/sewer. Mr. Behr said that would be addressed at a future hearing. Another neighbor raised the issue of traffic and noted that within a mile and a half things just keep getting built up. He asked when there would be lights and when "country living" would die. Mr. Belair said 3 single family homes generate only 3 peak hour trip ends, which is very low. Mr. Behr added that the Board does consider when the "tipping point" is reached, but because it is a state road, the City has no control over it. Mr. Stuono said it seems the applicant is proposing what is opposite to the SEQ design criteria for the width/depth ratio. Mr. Belair said it is up to the Board to decide whether they want the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 OCTOBER 2009 PAGE 4 lots more in compliance as the applicant is asking for a waiver. Mr. Stuono said if it doesn't meet the standards without a waiver, the argument can be made that it doesn't fit the zoning. He noted the Board required another developer to come much closer to the standards than this. Mr. McCain showed the Board another plan which he said demonstrates why the standards won't work here. Mr. Stuono said he felt these lots are not what the city wants here, and he is very uncomfortable with it. Mr. Farley and Ms. Quimby were OK with the design because it is infill. Mr. Birmingham said he can see both points. He felt there has to be a standard the Board can hold to. He added that he would prefer to see only 2 lots. Mr. McCain said with infrastructure costs, that isn't feasible. Mr. Stuono felt this may be a situation where you can't max out density. He said the proposed plan creates a house that is virtually isolated from the rest of the community, a "backyard" lot. Mr. Birmingham said he favored continuing the hearing until the rest of the planning staff is available to comment. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Sketch Plan Application of Algimantas and Neringa Shalna until 3 November 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. S. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant has asked for a continuance until 3 November. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport until 3 November 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Clerk //kb_71 Date DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 NOVEMBER 2009 PAGE 2 subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-09 of Joe Larkin to alter the existing grade by adding 800 cubic yards of fill, 23 Pinnacle Drive: Mr. Larkin showed the area where fill will go. He said he had talked with neighbors regarding plantings and drainage concerns. He indicated they will use contours so water will flow away from the house. Mr. Donahue noted that even if the DRB approves this, the Pinnacle Board can deny it. He said the Board is concerned with remaining views of the lake from Pinnacle and wants to keep the view corridor open. Mr. Belair noted that no landscaping is allowed to grow higher than the house. Mr. Donahue noted there are sometimes covenants which are more restrictive than city regulations. He felt there should be a way to coordinate this, possibly asking the applicants if they are aware of any covenants. Mr. Knudsen said the DRB cannot deny an application because it conflicts with private covenants. Mr. Bresee referred to the Spear St. corridor study and suggested the applicant consider that if a berm is to be built. Mr. Belair said they are 35 feet from city property, so there are no city issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-09 of Joe Larkin subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-45 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna to subdivide a 39,475 sq. ft. parcel into three lots of 13,938 sq. ft. (lot 2A), 12,746 sq. ft. (Lot 2B), and 12, 746 sq. ft. (Lot 2C), 45 Highland Terracv: Mr. Behr noted that the DRB met with the Planning Commission regarding issues in the City. The Planning Commission was very clear about having applicants adhere to design standards in a district relating to density, etc. He noted that lot 2A is not in compliance with the district regulations as it is being presented. The applicant showed an alternate plan that does conform. He said it is actually cheaper to build. Staff was OK with the applicant going forward. 6. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three -level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked to continue the application until 17 1 SHEET INDEX S-1 SIT[ S-2 SEV S-3 WA' SW-1 ST( IN FEET ) t iah. 20 fL Topograptuy by Total Station Contour Interval 2" Assumed Datum. ACTIVITIES, COMPONENT LOCATIONS, SPECIFICATN7N5, AND DETAILS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF SITE NOIM AND SHALL NOTIFY MCCAIN CONSULTING OF ANY ISSUES OR DISCREPANCIES THAT ARISE FROM THAT REVIEW. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS PUN DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA SEC. 1403 FOR THE FILING OF SURVEY PUTS 1 " SITE TECHNICIAN: GUNNER MCCAIN B-237 TACT WORE YOU DIG' Y THE LOCATION OF f0 CONSTRUCTION. REVISIONS LEGEND QQ TP-I Troverse pant 00 IPF ban pipe frond /` V IRF kon rod frond 0 Tree 0 Manhole >< Barbed .ire fence I00 10' contours T contwrs �J Tree line — — Properly line — Right or roy line > Ditch/dromage scale — W Water line — — — — — Building envelope C Cl—t — — — — — — — — — Slone & pipe drain — 5 Serer line RECEIVED ED MAY 2 6 2010 City of So. Burlington SITE PLAN ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA THREE LOT SUBDIVISION HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT SCALE : I" = 20' MCCAIN CONSULTING, INC. DESIGNED BY: GNM PROJECT : #26103 DRAWN BY: SJH/RHP 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET CHeCIED BY: GNM WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 DATE: APRIL 26, 2010 SHEET S-1 { AM as ' GASSETE MF GRAPHIC SCALE i IDE se se 1 1 I HOUSE END HEDGE R0W � MANNOIE STORM 4 O DRAM —' STORM DRA�Oa ( PEEP X INSTALL STONE AND PIPE DRAIN ALONG f l i h - Il. I I ' 1 SIDE SEWER LINE TO REPLACE EXISTING _ DRAIN ALONG HIGHLAND TERRACE --� PROPOSED MANHOLE 3 I EXISTING DRIVEWAY ty— ANHOL£ T Topography by Total Station y Contour Internal 2' Assumed Datum _ EXISTING DI TPROPOSEDW ST U — WATER MAIN AI -- PROPOSED MANHOLE 2 8' SUR 35 PVC SEWER VC EXISTNG �ATER IRr HIwLAND RRRACE MAN 11 _ EX EXISTING SEWER ENE STUB ELECTRCAL PROPOSED gXpg FROM VESSEL RESIDENCE �'— EXISTING :' VAULT SAP v1 DEPTH UNKNOWN PROPOSED MANHOLE 1 _ � END OF EXISTING fi DIAMETER WATER EtE NTH PROPOSED HYDRANT TP-3 1 — CAP, THRUST BLOCK, AND r CURB STOP AS PER TO V _ PLAN BY RICHARD A MIXER, P.E. TITLED 'WATER I NOTE: ELECTRICAL VAULT MAIN EXTENSION, HIGHLAND TERRACE, SOUTH CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT 'BEFORE YOU qG- �--�' — NOTE, EXISTING BURLINGTON VT.' SAFE) VERIFY THE LOCATION a -� SHEETS S-1 $ SC ARE S-i DRIVEWAY S-2 GATED 12/4/85. LOCATION NOT VERIFIED BY NCI;AN CONSULTING. S P ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL NOT THE SAME SCALE SW-1 e CLEM OUT ON PIPE DRAIN M 1 8 W 4w '� 4 Y 2 dl RECEIVED LEGEND INST ILL ST4 AND I WE DRAIN -1 Traverse ALD G SIDE EWER U 4E TO point O IPF Iron pipe found o NF Iron rod found ♦Ha HI AND TE RACE JS & : /6 MAY 2 ® 2010 Water Shut off valve o� Concrete monument Ge9a monhak PROP D MA~ AGUE 3 City of So. Burlington O Storm drop c35 Wolff shut off valve _ —_ Tt r � Hydrant EXDS AN —too- 10' centaurs -- s � 630 " 2' contours ECT RAIN I'll Tree line Properly D STING S ORM DF MN Je4t G line Right of rwy line ED MAN MILE 4 425 EXISTING MANHOLE > Ditch/do-ge s.le — SI Sera line 1 — Slone A Pipe dram 920 B' PIPE TO EXTEND r INTO MANHOLE t0 EXISTING MANHOLE INVERT —.8 �Ir m>e a .,� m� o R �$. — e8 R Y — �8 — ,• —8 5 %00 0150 1a00 1r30 2.00 2.50 3.00 N50 4+00 .50 5+00 5+50 6.00 6.50 2100 2+50 8.0) 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+0D 0 SEWER LINE PROFILE ° 50 25D HORIZONTAL SCALEE I" = 50' HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" = 50 VERTICALCa �.n 1" = 5' VERTICAL SCALE I" = 5' REVISIONS CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD drb\sub\shalna\shalna final2.doc nda #7 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: October 14, 2009 Plans received: September 23, 2009 45 HIGHLAND TERRACE— 3-LOT SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-08-36 Meetinq date: Auqust 5. 2008 Owner/Applicant Algimantas & Neringa Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Cc-ntact Person Property Information Gi inner McCain Tax Parcel 0850-00045 III' ,Vi--Cain Consulting Inc SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential I 93 ;mouth Main Street 0.91 acres II i Waterbu , VT 05676 yam, Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotsketch PROJECT DESCRIPTION Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking sketch plan review to subdivide a 39, 475 sq. ft. parcel into three (3) lots of 13,983 sq. ft. (lot 2A), 12,746 sq. ft. (lot 2) and 12,746 sq. ft. (lot 2C), 45 Highland Terrace Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on September 23, 2009 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Neighborhood Residential Zoning District Requirement/Limitation Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 12,746 SF Max. Density-NR 1.2 units/acre base density max of 4/acre with TDR) 3.3 units/acre** Max. Building Coverage 15% ** Max. Total Coverage 30% ** Min. Front Setback 30 ft. ** Min. Side Setback 10 ft. ** Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. `* + The acreage of the lot will not support a home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. Only one dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of at least two additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). ** The application does not propose actual structures. Actual structures will be sited on the lots as part of a zoning permit. This application seeks only to create the lots and general layout for the dwelling units. The concept plan remains within the coverage limitations of the district. 1. Only one dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of at least two additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The purchase of the development right documents must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to recording the mylar. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotsketch The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast Quadrant. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this prcperty is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Southeast Quadrant District This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district. Therefore it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning District. A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ- NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub- district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. 3. The structures shall not exceed the height limitations of the district. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels The proposed lots would consume the majority of what is already a small lot. There are very little opportunities for open space on this small lot. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable subdistrict allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. The proposed subdivision is in compliance with this criterion with the exception of the density limitations noted above. Additional units may be permitted on the subject lots with the appropriate transfers of development right(s). (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotsketch Again, there are no natural areas or open spaces proposed on this small lot. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 4. Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. (5) vufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the usP of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. There are no wetlands or streams on the subject property. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. This criterion is not applicable to this application. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. The preliminary plat plans shall detail the proposed water and sewer connections, which shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and Superintendent of the Water Department. 5. The preliminary plat plans shall detail the proposed water and sewer connections, which shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and Superintendent of the Water Department. (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotsketch Hinesburg Road is included among several corridors on the Official City Map for a proposed recreation path. Several properties along the road have already dedicated easements to the City. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee previously reviewed the plans for the adjacent lot on Hinesburg Road and an easement is now included on that property. Nothing further is necessary for this property. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. No additional recreation paths or sidewalks are necessary as part of this application (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to in sure that adequwte fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. The Fire Chief shall review the plans. It is likely that he will recommend fitting the h,)mes on the private road with sprinklers. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic rnanagor'en' strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficie i'L to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. Staff finds no need to design the road so as to serve adjacent properties (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. No new roads are planned as part of this application. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. No new roads are planned as part of this application. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. No new roads are planned as part of this application. 9.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 31otsketch A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections.. (2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersectians shall be 300 to 400 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section '15. 12(D)(4) of ihese Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards 0) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and 1C.^.al) 'A-i the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that dise'Laurage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and 9-9 below. (2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. (4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4). (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5). (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 3lotsketch C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets). (2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. (3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close rs-lationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildi:cgs should be set back fifteen feet (151) from the back of sidewalk. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not bE e�,c•.losed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line C4 the house by F. minimum of eight feet. (6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing types. It is unclear if these criteria are being met based on plans provided, except that the garages do not seem to meet the setbacks recommended. The Board should discuss whether they wish to enforce the SEQ design criteria on this application. 6. The Board shall discuss whether they wish to enforce the SEQ design criteria on the proposed subdivision. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items before proceeding to the preliminary plat level of review. Rq,spectfully submitted, Cathyann' LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, applicants Paul Dandurand August 9, 2009 Mr. Algis Shalna 7951 Williston Rd. Williston, VT 05495 Dear Mr. Shalna, 51 Van Sicklen Road South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)578-5653 1 am willing to sell you up to two development transfer rights (TDRs) from my property at 51 Van Sicklen Rd., South Burlington, for the price of $16,000 each. I will give you, or your property buyer, first right of refusal to purchase these from me between now and 12/31/09. This means in the event I have another buyer, I will contact you and give you first option to buy up to two TDRs at said prices. Sincerely, Paul Dandurand WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BYTHESE PRESENTS that We, Jacic Hyde and Paula D. Miller, of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantors, in consideration of TEN OR MORE Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by Algimantas Shala and Neringa Shala, of Williston in the Countyof Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantees, by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEYAND CONFIRM unto the said Grantees, Algimantas Shala and Neringa Shala, husband and wife, tenants by the entirety, and their heirs and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in the City of South Burlington, in the County of Chi . ttendend State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: f� vi 0 0 Being all and the same land and premises conveyed to Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller by Warranty Deed of Daniel E. Wright dated September 15, 2000 and ofrecord in Volume485 on Pages 276-278 of the City of South Burlington Land Records and being further described as follows: Being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to Daniel E. Wright and Beatrice L. Wright (now deceased) by Warranty Deed of Gerald Vaillancourt and Wilima J. Vaillancourt dated October 1, 1975, and recorded in Volume 126, Page 66 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Lands and premises with residence thereon consisting of two separate parcels of land described as follows: Parcel I : A lot of land with residence thereon, the dwelling house being known and designated as No. 1450 Hinesburg Road; situated on the easterly side of Hinesburg Road, said lot being more particularly described as Lot #1 as shown on a Plan entitled "Tract Plan — Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont-- property of Christian B. Hoskam, Jr_, and Hazel G. Hoskarn", dated June 17, 1957, and of record in Volume 11, Maps, Page 307 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, Said lot has a frontage on Hinesburg Road, its westerly line of I54.6975 feet, a northerly and southerly line of 200 feet each, and an easterly line of 154.6975 feet. Being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to the within Grantors by the: Warranty Deed of Helen B. Puffer, dated May 28, 1969, recorded at Volume 91, Pages 89-91 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. This conveyance is made subject to certain protective covenants, including a utility easement -over the rear 10 feet of the lot herein conveyed, dated June 19, 1957, recorded at Volume 34, Page 324 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. This conveyance includes the right to water as set forth in the Warranty Deed of Roland E. Peterson doing business under the firm name and style of Peterson Construction Co, to Helen Puffer and also all rights to water, and duties associated there with as set forth in a Water Rights Agreement from Merrill E_ Gave to Hilda Y. Gove to Helen B. Puffer, dated October 31, 1957, and of record in Volume 34, Page 38 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, J OFFICZS OF Dan. oVFRTON Parcel 2 : A lot of land lying easterly of the aforementioned Parcel #1, said lot having a westerly line NU -SON. Pc of 156.89 feet, a northerly line of 250.72 feet an easterly line of 160.59, and a southerly line of ,AM STREET 246.85 feet, said lot being designated as Extension to Lot #1 as shown on a Plan entitled 'Plan of NLTION. VeRmOMT 5a52-D19i9 7540 LAW OFFICES OF OLVOORD. OVERTON 3 MAW STREET SEX JUNCTION. VERMONr Land Belongitla o CB. Hoskam, South Burlington, Vermont, Ja._ .s R. Ogden Land Surveyor, Charlotte, Vermont, dated July 26, 1969, recorded at Volume 1&0, Pages 115-116 of the City of South Burlington. Being all and the same lot of land conveyed to the within Grantors by the Warranty Deed of Christian B. Hoskam and Hazel C. Hoskam dated August 21, 1969, recorded at_Volume 91, Pages 334-6 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. To said deed, plan of land, the records thereof and to all deeds and records therein referred to, reference is hereby made in aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the.privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Algimantas Shala and Neringa Shala, husband and wife, tenants by the entirety, and their heirs and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever, and We, the said Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller, Grantors, for ourselves and our heirs and assigns, do covenant with the said Grantees, Algimantas Shala and Neringa Shala, and their heirs and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents we are the sole owners of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; except as aforesaid, and We do hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, We hereunto set our hands and seals this 3 0 day of June A.D. 2006. IN THE PRESE O ) Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. Jack Hyde _ Paula D. Miller At LO t C lisINf this 3 0 dav of3une A.D_ 2006, Jack Hyde d-Paula D_ Miller personally appeared, and they acknowledged this insu ment, em d subscribed, to be their free act and deed. Vermont Property TransfBe me, --^ 32 V.S.A. Chap 231 Notary Public -ACKNJWLCCGEMEN - P.'ciUMW RFC J-TAX FAQ Sc7XW OF W—KTH CERT. REr'D. VT LV40 USE M QESELCPF.CRY PAWS AST. CERT. RECD v4j, Ipd �frtcrnt) j Clerk DateV 2a My commission expires: 2/10/07 t 1. WARBa lY DEED h KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that We, Jactt Iiyde and Paula D. Miller, of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont; Grantors, in consideration of TEN OR MORE Dollars paid to our full saWnctio, by Algimantas Shag. and Neringa Shalaa, of Williston in the County of Chittenden. and State of Vermont, Grantees, by thesePresents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVl;YAND CONFIRM unto the said Neringa Sha1a, husband and wife ��, `��mant5s Shale and , tenants by the entirety, ng�on t, in than' their heirs and certain piece of lamd in the City of South Burl " signs forever, a Vermont described as follows, via: e County of Chittenden And State of Being all and the same land and Premises conveyed to Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller by Deed of and E. Wrigbt dated September 15, 20W and of -record in Vohrrne 4a5 on Warranty oftire City of South $urlington band Records and being further described as follows es 276-278 Being all and the same lands and Premises conveyed to Daniel E. Wright and Beatrice L. Wright (now deceased) by WarrantyDeed of Gerald Vaillancourt and WilimaJ. Vaillancood dated 1, 1975, and recorded in Volume 126, Page 66 of the City of South Burlington Land sober Lands and premises with residence thereon consisting of tWo Se follows: - Imr parcels of land described as e1 : A lot of land with resWenoethenm3n,the dwo!!" No. 1450 Hmesburg Road; situated on the mg house being known and designated as Particularly described as Lot ill ea shown on a Plan sideentitof g mod, said lot being more Burlington, Vermont-Prope1ryofChristianB >'�n-' d Road, South 1957, and of nacord in Volume 11, ' h' and Hamel � l�ca:n� dated Juno 17 , Said tot has a frontage on Hinesburg R, page s w o westerly City ofSouth Burlington Land Record southerly line of 200 feet each, a R°�' its wes<uiy Irae of i54.6875 feet, a northerly and easterly line of 154.6975 feet. Being all and the same of Helen B_ Puffer, dated 1dsand pre is" coned W the within Grp by the Warranty D� Burlington Land Records Y - > recorded at Volume 91, Pages b9-91 of the City of South This conveyance is made subject to certain the Protective covenants, including a utility easement -over near 10 feet of the lot herein eonvayed, dated bore 19, 1957, reoosded at Volume 34, of the City of South E616 M Land Records. Page 324 This conveyance includes the right to water as set forth in the Warranty Deed of Roland E. Peterson doing business under the firm name and style ofpeLerson all rights to water, and duties Construction CO, Helen Puffer and also associated these with as set forth in a Wafer Ri Merrill E. Gove to Hilda'i'. ({ova to Helen $. puffer, � Agreement from Volume 34, Page 38 of the Ciry of South en dated October 31, 1957, and of record- in >� crF Burlington Land Records. : ovewrox Parcel 2 : A lot of land lying easterly of the aforementioned Parcel #1, said lot having a westerly line STN• pc of 156.89 feet, a northerly line of 250.72 feet an easterly line of 160.Sa, and a southerly line of Am. 246.85 feet, said lot being designated as Extension to Lot #1 as shown on a Plan er►tiherly Tian of �+. v�++aoivr LAW 0FnCE5 OF OLVOOHO. OVERTON 6. VAt-saw. PC - 3 MAN STMET K 1.0 SOc JVN"ON, VERAIOW Y GS45Z=3199 Land Belonging to C B. 75 410 8 g Hoskam, South Burlington, Vermont, James R_ Ogden Land Surveyor, Charlotte, Vernaont, dated July 26, 1969, recorded at Volume South Burlington. 130, Pages ! 15-d l8 of the City of Being all and the same lot of land conveyed to the within Grantors by the Warranty Deed of Christian B_ Hoskam and Hanel C. Hoskam dated August 21, 1969, recorded at Volume 91. Pages 334-6 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. To said deed, plan of land, the records thereof and to alI deeds and records therein referred to reference is hereby made in aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the. privileges: and appurtenances thereof, to the said Algimantas Shala and Neriaga Shala, husband and wife, tenants by the entirety, and their heirs and assigns. to their oven use and behoof forever; and We, the said Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller, Grantors, for ourselves and our heirs and signs, do covenant with the said Grantees, Afgimantaa Shala and Neringa Shala, and theirheirs and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents we are the sole owners of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same m manner aforesaid, that the y are FREE FROM EVERY ENCIIMgRANC aforesaid, and We do hereby en Wt as !'� to ARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. 2006. IN wnNESS WHEREOF. We hereunto set our hands and seals this 3 6 day of June A.D. Jack Hyde l'aWa D. Miller ,TATE OF VZ RMONT 'OUNTY OF CH17F ENDEN, SS. At LO I t �1S this 3 D day of]une A_D_ 2006, Jack Hyde d PI nla D_ Miller e O'Wly appeared and they acknowledged this instrument, can Heir free act and deed, d embed, to be Vermont Property T-msfHe%me, 32 V_S.A. Chap 231 Notary public -ACKNOWLEDGEMENT- TV? W R EMMXA4.0eza,9aOF►F-$&T4 W..REM My commission expires: 2/10/07 �kX�iN�'dtjfr/crM) No Text 1 O O +O I x � 0 LLJJ . ■■�JI! _ _ � MINE mmuumml - _ ice■ �I II 1 DRILLED WELL r LOCATION TBD 33'-0" 7'-0" 12'-0" 14'-0" r jjttyy 1 0" 8'-6" 7 -0" 7'-0'g 12SONOTU as (2 TOTAL) 9LCOCK 5 OEM NABOVE Ell •I 0 a��g��� _ _ _ WINDOW LOCATION Sg�Si3� i w co UP cd m O ',, i - Lii I b EON 1 11 zwo MEN Q It- MEME Vl TING LL e� F O p pa I � Seals WI'-W Dm by UIS Dote 6/1"1 ReviNone 23'-0" Drawklg Number FOUNDATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" - V-O" � - 2 1318 of I� Sheet R Of 4 COORD. WITH SINK LL3- SILM L4, pl J�. ICE MOVE Wo L V75UPP—ORi�SMRbCW-A-T'2iD—FLCi3i-, DRILLED WELL r LOCATION TBD 33'-0" 7'-0" 12'-0" 14'-0" r jjttyy 1 0" 8'-6" 7 -0" 7'-0'g 12SONOTU as (2 TOTAL) 9LCOCK 5 OEM NABOVE Ell •I 0 a��g��� _ _ _ WINDOW LOCATION Sg�Si3� i w co UP cd m O ',, i - Lii I b EON 1 11 zwo MEN Q It- MEME Vl TING LL e� F O p pa I � Seals WI'-W Dm by UIS Dote 6/1"1 ReviNone 23'-0" Drawklg Number FOUNDATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" - V-O" � - 2 1318 of I� Sheet R Of 4 COORD. WITH SINK LL3- SILM L4, pl J�. ICE MOVE Wo L V75UPP—ORi�SMRbCW-A-T'2iD—FLCi3i-, - I � FNDN WINDOW � I I I m l l BEAM POCKET I �COOKTOP NEEDS LEGEND DROP HEADER n POST 1/2 WALL RAILING k BALLISTERS 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE STUD 70 STUD. z WINDOWS AND DOORS TO OENTERUNE OF OPENIN0. 1 INTERIOR WALLS 3 1 I1ESS NlNOTED O1NEli1WSE, EXTERIOR WALLS S 4. ALL DOORS AND llfll/2'. 0R OPENINGS ARE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE a WINDOW HEADERS AT r-1T', FIRST FLOOR. W-11' SECOND FLOOR. U.N.O. & FEW FLOOR HEIGHT AT IV -I'. SECOND FLOOR AT 8'-1'. I � I I I I 6 -0' 1 3'-6" , 1 --- -------------1-------L------ F �� I C I ❑w ® I .� ' 12-1 LA1NDRr SAT14 2 h � h BEDROOM 1 A •I 3080 ' _— o 6_1• U-J� 2480 '9" B2 a-6" WALK-IN il'-3" •j 080 3080 PKi. H S h I 080 5 CUSTOM 4'-0' HIGHJ 4--3j- M Tw 30" HICH WA W/GLASS PANEL i o I 82 ON a�.l 4'-3' V-7' BEDROOM 3 1�1{IJ i I n � o i D FPLC. $ 1V 3-2r T2 1 i Sir o SLOPE i Mi �l 1 I .o I 4'-3" 5'-0. N o VAULTED CElMC r / \ I I 41 I O I I I do ,I L------------------- J G I I g _g. 1 I 33'-0" I I I I I SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCAM: 1/4" - V-0" 13M A i / \ a I � a I VAULTED CUAC I 1 I , I , I I I , I , I , I , I I , I , I , I , I � I I I , I , I , I , I , I \ , I , I \\ I I V-0" TYPICAL ALL AROUND // \ I I � i I I I I I i I VAULIEA CEINC i 1 I VAIxTm COUND I I i i I L ------------ - - - - - - --J I i i I I SLOPES j:SLOPE I a I I I I I I I I ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4" - V-0" TYPICAL ALL AROUND U L1 i 4w 1 d swlw w'.r-r Drown by LRtd Dotty 6/!WI A-3 R Eo Permit Number SD- O - APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) gka�n s Mer�ngq 'sWaa 1851 '1k6l 2 C) (,JAI;;s VT os,-49 cell : 55 - n49S 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) -45,4 ` 310 3 1 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) S(vme, 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc GO tirnn�e 5) CONTACT PERSON a (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 1 trn /, 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Zy.t_ Iyg2 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) V ? so 090 y � 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property_ (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) `RXCeQ (few S,'-q�e - 0r '%� resa-)encos c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) 401 auxG mull . W QR0,A �`vn5 e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not s ecifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) SEc� 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing O % Proposed % 2G - \s a%u b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) 2A - t 8°Ib Existing 0 % Proposed % 20, _ v%°lo 2c - 2y°I c) Front yard (along each street) Existing O % Proposed % 2h- 330io 7-9 — 36,110 2C — i2 "�o 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) uj Pc- ch) SyujeC' •2x�ec%s crr,-N 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE C -AEP CANT SIGNATURE OF PROPER OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 1 4 I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: Compl of Planning & Zoning or Designee 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 OCTOBER 2009 PAGE 2 unit, 670 Nowland Farm Road: and 5. Site Plan Application #SP-09-76 of Steve and Jennifer Heroux to construct a 1065 sq. ft. detached accessory structure for use as an accessory residential unit, 670 Nowland Farm Road: Mr. Snyder said they are requesting to build a "pool house" with a residential unit (bedroom, bathroom & kitchen included). He said the applicants are aware of the regulations that apply to accessory residential structures. Mr. Belair said staff had no issues. Mr. Young asked if the accessory unit could ever be subdivided from the property. Mr. Belair said it could not. The applicant just merged the properties in order to have enough land to accommodate a pool and tennis court. Ms. Quimby moved to close the hearing and to approve Conditional Use Application #CU-09-09 and Site Plan Application #SP-09-76 of Steve and Jennifer Heroux subject to the stipulations in the draft motion, with the understanding that the draft motion will be reviewed by the DRB when available. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. (Mr. Belair noted that due to illness in the Planning Department, draft motions are not available at this meeting) Mr. Behr resumed the Chair of the Board. 6. Final Plat Application #SD-09-44 of Technology Park Partners to amend a previously approved 15-lot subdivision. The amendment consists of adjusting the boundary lot lines of 113 Kimball Avenue and 10 Community Drive: Mr. Meenan explained that one of the original conditions of approval was that the applicant would widen the existing Community Drive. In 2006, that was done. The proposed application will make it easier for vehicles to pull in and out of Community Drive. Mr. Belair suggested that the applicant be required to provide the entire subdivision plan with a revision to show this change. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-09-44 of Technology Park Partners subject to the stipulations in the draft motion, with the understanding that the draft motion will be reviewed by the DRB when available. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Sketch Plan Application of Algimantas and Neringa Shalna to subdivide a 39,475 sq. ft. parcel into three lots of 13,983 sq. ft. (lot 2A),12,746 sq. ft. (lot 213) and 12,746 sq. ft. (lot 2C), 45 Highland Terrace: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 OCTOBER 2009 PAGE 3 Mr. Belair noted this is one lot of a 2-lot subdivision, and the request is to subdivide this one lot into three lots. Mr. McCain said each lot would be about 1/3 of an acre. He noted there would be some variations from the Southeast Quadrant regulations because this is an infill project. He felt that what they are proposing fits with what exists in the area. Mr. Belair noted that the Fire Chief may require the 3 buildings to have sprinklers. Mr. Behr said he would like to see the applicant follow the SEQ design guidelines for residential buildings. Mr. Knudsen and Mr. Birmingham agreed. Members agreed this could be done at the administrative level. Mr. Stuono was concerned with the layout of the lots and whether they face Highland Terrace or the private drive. Mr. Belair said the house in the rear should be oriented to the private street. Mr. McCain noted that Mr. Shalnar needs to pick up 2 TDRs in order to do this project. Mr. Belair said he would have to purchase TDRs for lots 2 & 3 before building permits for those lots could be pulled. The sending lot must also be surveyed. Mr. Abrams, a neighbor, said what is being proposed doesn't seem to fit with what is there from the standpoint of scale. He said it seems they are "stuffing in" dwellings. He added that he would like to see the trees in the city's right-of-way retained. Mr. Belair suggested that be taken up with the Public Works Dept. Mr. Behr noted this is a "receiving" area and there is a potential for 4 houses per acre Mr. Lavanway, also a neighbor, said he was concerned with drainage. He said that as it is now, his land doesn't dry out until August. Mr. McCain said they would use the city's storm water drainage. Mr. Knudsen said the applicant will have to engineer the site so as not to increase runoff onto Mr. Lavanway's property. Mr. Maynes, another neighbor, asked if the applicant will use city water and sewer. Mr. Belair said city sewer is proposed. Mr. McCain said they are also looking at extending the water line and adding a fire hydrant. Mr. Maynes asked if there would be any obligation for neighbors to participate in the water/sewer. Mr. Behr said that would be addressed at a future hearing. Another neighbor raised the issue of traffic and noted that within a mile and a half things just keep getting built up. He asked when there would be lights and when "country living" would die. Mr. Belair said 3 single family homes generate only 3 peak hour trip ends, which is very low. Mr. Behr added that the Board does consider when the "tipping point" is reached, but because it is a state road, the City has no control over it. Mr. Stuono said it seems the applicant is proposing what is opposite to the SEQ design criteria for the width/depth ratio. Mr. Belair said it is up to the Board to decide whether they want the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 OCTOBER 2009 PAGE 4 lots more in compliance as the applicant is asking for a waiver. Mr. Stuono said if it doesn't meet the standards without a waiver, the argument can be made that it doesn't fit the zoning. He noted the Board required another developer to come much closer to the standards than this. Mr. McCain showed the Board another plan which he said demonstrates why the standards won't work here. Mr. Stuono said he felt these lots are not what the city wants here, and he is very uncomfortable with it. Mr. Farley and Ms. Quimby were OK with the design because it is infill. Mr. Birmingham said he can see both points. He felt there has to be a standard the Board can hold to. He added that he would prefer to see only 2 lots. Mr. McCain said with infrastructure costs, that isn't feasible. Mr. Stuono felt this may be a situation where you can't max out density. He said the proposed plan creates a house that is virtually isolated from the rest of the community, a "backyard" lot. Mr. Birmingham said he favored continuing the hearing until the rest of the planning staff is available to comment. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Sketch Plan Application of Algimantas and Neringa Shalna until 3 November 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant has asked for a continuance until 3 November. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport until 3 November 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Clerk l/ 6 Date October 9, 2009 Algimantas and Neringa Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: 45 Highland Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the October 20th, 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Cc: Gunner McCain Consulting, Inc. 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 Waterbury, VT 05676 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com October 9, 2009 Douglas and Elaine Maynes 9 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 45 Highland Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the October 20th 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. The enclosure includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846- 4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846,4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com �V'��������� � lop Interested Persons Record and Service List so -tit vrli.'iltgtar' Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect buinterested persons. Adany hearing, there must bean opportunity for each persor wishing to achieve interestpd person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable critoria.24V.S.A. § 4401(b).lfie OK8must keep awritten record of the name, address and participation of each person who I ias sought interested person status. 24V.S.A. §4481(b).Acopy ofany decision rendered bythe DRBmust bemailed toevery person orbody appearing and having been heard bythe ORB.24V.S.A. §4481(b)(3).Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons tothe appellant infive working days. 24V.S.A. §4471(o). �L HEK� K~E& �0 -���-r-'- PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! --- ^ iU1� ~^.i` k»\".QVQ]�x/ k� �Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004revisions toChapter 117.the Development Review Board (DR8)has certain administrative obligations with respect h»interested persons. Adany hearing, there must bean opportunityfor ^ compliance with the applicable criteria. 24V.S.A. §4461(b).The DFi8muo, keep swritten record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24V.S.A. §4481(b).Acopy ofany decision rendered bythe DR8must bemai|ocituevery person orbody appearing and having been heard bythe DRB.24V.8.A. §44S1(b)(3).Upon receipt ofnotice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list ` of interested persons tothe appellant infive working days. 24V.S.A. §4471(o). HEARING DATE: OC-46W, )-0 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME 14G A P.D S'S �ST | | i | ! ' ! Algimantas & Neringa Shalna Parce10850-00045 Adjoining Landowners Parcel Adioiner 0850-00009 Douglas W. & Elaine Maynes 9 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0850-00030 Gardner Construction P.O. Box 21 Colchester, VT 05446 0850-00040 John W. & Patricia A. Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01405 Homer L. & Marie J. Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01440 Judith M. Lavanway 1440 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01450 Thaddeus McDougal & Jamie Fratamico 1450 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Y:AProjects\26's\26103\2009ATownAAdjoiners.doc McCain Consulting, Inc. Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting September 22, 2009 Ray B elair South Burlington Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Application for 3-Lot Subdivision, Sketch Plan Review Shalna Property, Highland Terrace, South Burlington McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Ray, Enclosed please find the following information in support of the above referenced project: 1. A complete Sketch Plan Review application 2. A fee check in the amount of $125.00 (one hundred twenty-five dollars) 3. A list of adjoining landowners 4. A copy of the Warranty Deed to the property 5. Five (5) 18" x 24" copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy of the preliminary site plan (Sheet 1 of 1, "Option A", dated 8/31/09) The project is located in the SEQ-NR District and involves the subdivision of parcel 0850-00045 into three lots, each with a proposed residence. Please note that the layout presented is not entirely consistent with the Residential Design Criteria as articulated in section 9.08 of the City's Land Development Regulations; however it is our opinion that it is the best layout for the site. Other options, some that meet the requirements and others that do not, will be presented at the hearing, at which time we will discuss our position. Please contact us when the date for Sketch Plan Review has been determined. Thank you and please feel free to call with any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, McCain_Cons mg, Inc. icole Fit Project Administrator Enc. Cc: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, w/ enclosures 'nrh�26bk�61A���9E14!'£ent �4ai agheieh dee 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 • Waterbury, VT 05676 • (802) 244-5093 Tel. • (802) 244-7492 Fax .. Q'i 0 :601001- southburlinton PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM To: Gunner McCain Fr: Bill Szymanski, City Engineer Re: Shalna 2-lot subdivision Date: October 16, 2008 I have reviewed the plans submitted by you to the City on September 29, 2008 and have the following comments: 1. The perforated under drain pipe will be difficult to construct as plans show. The under drain can be laid adjacent to the 8 inch sewer until about Sta. 6+00 then brought up to outlet to the existing storm drain. There should be at least two openings for flushing this line -one at start and one midway. 2. The 8 inch sewer at Dubois Drive is very deep (11 +/- feet). The sewer can be raised so that it outlets at a depth of about 6 feet (Elev. 420). Extend connection into manhole 3 inches so a cap or elbow can be attached if needed. 3. Manholes shall be placed on bed of crushed stone, not gravel as plans show. 4. A typical road path detail shall be shown. The gravel base shall be at least 18 inches thick and bituminous pavement shall be at least 4 inches (2 Y2 base course and 1 '/2 surface course). 5. Cast iron manhole covers and frames shall be heavy duty type not hinged type as the plans show. 6. A road opening permit from the City Street Dept. is required for this project. 7. Sewer pipe shall be bedded in 3/ inch crushed stone, not gravel or sand. 8. Manholes exterior shall be bituminous coated. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802,846,4106 fax 802,846.4101 www.sburi.com M°Cain Consulting, Inc. September 29, 2008 Betsy McDonough Brown Planning and Zoning Assistant 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Algimantas Shalna, SD-08-36 Condition fulfillment Dear Betsy, 14 Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting l/�Y/I �E N)Cfj� As per conditions 3 and 8 of the above referenced permit, enclosed please find 3 copies of revised plans for the project. Site Plan Sheet 1 of 1 dated 8/20/07, previous last revision of 7/11/08 has been revised to be Sheet 1 of 3, shows the utility easement to lot 1 and the proposed location of a drilled well for lot 2, both as requested in the city engineer's letter of December 6, 2007. That sheet is now last revised 9/29/08. Plan Sheet 2 of 3 dated 8/20/07, last revised 12/24/07 provides the revised sewer line profile with the grade adjusted at the northern end, also as requested by the city engineer. Plan Sheet 3 of 3 dated 11/6/07, last revised 12/24/07, shows the 8" sewer main bedded in stone, again as requested by the city engineer. As the permit requires approval of these plans by the Administrative Officer, please provide conformation that the plans as submitted are acceptable. The permit also requires approval and recordation of the recreation path easement deed prior to recording of the survey mylar. That will be submitted separately. Once that has been submitted and approved we will submit the survey mylar for recording. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, McCain Con ting, Inc. Gunner McCain Enc. Cc: Algis Shama Joseph Fallon YAPr0jeM\26s1261031P&,Z Letter 9-29-08.doc 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 • Waterbury, VT 05676 • (802) 244-5093 Tel. • (802) 244-7492 Fax Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 Algimantas and Negrina Shalna 1450 Hinesburg Road- 2 Lot subdivision December 6, 2007 The plans submitted on December 6, 2007 by McCain Consulting Engineers are acceptable with the following modifications: 1. The plans should be revised to approximate location of a well to serve lot 2. 2. Gravity sewer main should be 8 inch and bedded in crushed stone. 3. The sewer main grade should be adjusted at its north end where it ties into Ledge Knoll 4. Parcel 2 should include a 15 foot utility easement for water and sewer to lot 1. Except for number 4, these recommendations were discussed with Mr. McCain. McCain Consulting, Inc. September 29, 2008 Betsy McDonough Brown Planning and Zoning Assistant 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Algimantas Shalna, SD-08-36 Condition fulfillment Dear Betsy, t* Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting As per conditions 3 and 8 of the above referenced permit, enclosed please find 3 copies of revised plans for the project. Site Plan Sheet 1 of 1 dated 8/20/07, previous last revision of 7/11/08 has been revised to be Sheet 1 of 3, shows the utility easement to lot 1 and the proposed location of a drilled well for lot 2, both as requested in the city engineer's letter of December 6, 2007. That sheet is now last revised 9/29/08. Plan Sheet 2 of 3 dated 8/20/07, last revised 12/24/07 provides the revised sewer line profile with the grade adjusted at the northern end, also as requested by the city engineer. Plan Sheet 3 of 3 dated 11/6/07, last revised 12/24/07, shows the 8" sewer main bedded in stone, again as requested by the city engineer. As the permit requires approval of these plans by the Administrative Officer, please provide conformation that the plans as submitted are acceptable. The permit also requires approval and recordation of the recreation path easement deed prior to recording of the survey mylar. That will be submitted separately. Once that has been submitted and approved we will submit the survey mylar for recording. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, McCain Cons lting, Inc. r Gunner McCain Enc. Cc: Algis Shalna Joseph Fallon YAPr0jects\26'A26103\P&Z Letter 9-29-08.doc 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 - Waterbury, VT 05676 - (802) 244-5093 Tel. - (802) 244-7492 Fax McCain Consulting, Inc. Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting February 26.2007 Julie Beth Hines Director of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Infrastructure Extension Algimantas Shala Property, Highland Terrace, South Burlington McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Julie Beth, As per our recent discussions, with this letter we are requesting that you begin the process of determining the feasibility of extending the municipal water and sewer lines from Dubois Drive up and along Highland Terrace to the Shala property. I have enclosed a concept sketch of the proposal for your review. My understanding is that you will initiate the process, determine if an adequate number of landowners are interested, and proceed accordingly. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, McCain Consulting, Inc. Gunner McCain Enc. Cc: Algis Shala, w/ enclosure Y:Trojects126sX26103VBHines Letter 2.26-07.doc 93 South Main Street • Waterbury, Vermont 05676 ® (802) 244-5093 Tel. ® (802) 244-7492 Fax CYI 1 CA) O N O O w CO O r ®► ®� 10WE ' s®uthburfint®n ltzr PLANNING & ZONING July 8, 2008 Algimantas Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: 1450 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Shalna: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on August 5, 2008 (effective 8/5/08). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 180 days (must be submitted & recorded by January 30,^2009) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Gunner McCain CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 6376 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com P L ;A N fN �m A:i: G & Z 0 fN 1 INS, G July 16, 2008 John & Patricia Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, MD�u Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 5r5 Daes*t i:S'%I P Sa1,,. 3s:i wig4.'-I, °,,T 115 4 Q 1 *#1 lax F,€,, `2.;:4 �.-`*:1,1 ,%,Ib a 7 f _-m July 16, 2008 Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. "? Mai "try. t - ar' s fs l;.,191C, ;, 4 s „1Ft4 3 k I f,C!1 !14s".w< �_ 1 July 16, 2008 Joseph & Lisa Malley 1425 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 6 &� �q &N x Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 675 Dorsal, streot a,0a u—Ii 41e-,n, Y T It 4 lt2 0a',4 f 0-A4f1161 4 ss G ,H-1-S,41AI .nee vv u ,C-. July 16, 2008 Judith Lavanway 1440 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. raL, rescued, _ healthy box -trained, spayed, cash donation. Info: )76, www.SaveOur- ID PUPPY FOR SALE nos., all shots, spayed, children. $350/OBO. !-335-8014, Leonard- hoo.com. & KITTEN 1 grey cat ry Loving and friend- : -and -white kitten (8 friendly and playful. :andra kelley-st.clair, 45. EDS A NEW HOME Lov- 3etic kitten needs a All shots and spayed. t get along with the in our home. Please 802-264-9637. DLES Premium multi - registered puppies. !nic, luxurious coats e & cream. 2-yr. health spayed/neutered, 1st is, microchipped, pedi- iore. (AAN CAN) Info: 84, www.rockymtnlab- om. ,N MASTIFF PUPPIES 800. Info: Dave Qua- !-316-9601, q@green- s ►ment N GEL TRAINER Excel - ion. $200. new, $100 Robert Markle, 802- hikersnoski2@yahoo. (POUND BOW 65/85 1, 2-finger rest, pend. bushings. Also alum. Best offer. Info: 802- hikersnoski2@yahoo. SKATES Size 13. Make d they're yours! Info: 34. ACK 360 HOME GYM t summer, very little extended warranty/ plan, instructional cart. Paid $700 new; Info: 802-454-8010. .SERIES 1500 Easy :h wheel hitch used icross the US hauling Rails for your vehicle 0. Info: Linda Cooper, 75. BIKE RACK For sale. condition. Holds 2 used 3 times (no lon- Ae). Asking $75. Info: 15. F RACK One set tow- s of bars for vehicles Removable cups for X s are attached. Info: !r, 802-399-2475. INVERTER/CHARGER Light and brake light a plus. Info: 603-767-8228, sjbarrett5C mail.com. Bands/ Musicians ----------------------- DRUMMER Needed for hardwork- ing band. Recording, rehears- ing, live playing. Professional w/ investor. Contact ASAP. Info: 802-861-2871. FRIDAYS @ 6PM ON 105.9FM CrowfeatheR and Jim, 105.9FM's bad boys of rock are seeking; bands, singer -songwriters and guests. Get your music on the radio! Listen Fridays 6-8PM for info. Info: www.myspace. com/jimmurphyzoo. FUNKY BASS SINGER NEEDED For busy acapella performing group. Shared solo and backup. Hear demo at www.rt-7.com Info: 802-355-5253. GUITARIST/BASSIST AVAIL. Ex- perienced, w/some vocals avail- able. Most styles: classic rock, blues, country, etc. Excellent equipment, stage presence. Part- time only. Brandon, VT. Info: 802- 247-6990, dbonanzam@verizon. net, www.bLuefrets.com. JAZZ/REGGAE/FUNK/IMPROV Bassist looking for guitarist, drummer, percussionist, keys to jam with. Plenty of experience, skillz & pro gear. Interested in jazz, reggae, hip -hop & funk. Info: 802-922-0992. MENTALLY UNSTABLEBANDMATE Bass, lead guitar, drums, keys. Must be under 40 and not give a shit about anyone but yourself. Info: Hell No, 802-659-4276, www.myspace.com/josephpauL3. MUSICIANS WANTED... To form '60s tribute band with former members of Distant Thunder. Doing Byrds, Beatles, Stones, Turtles, DC-5, Beach Boys, etc. Part-time. Brandon, VT. Info: 802- 247-6990, dbonanzam@verizon. net, www.btuefrets.com. For Sale 8 GUITARS FS/T P/U/ONLY Mid - priced electrics and acoustics. Vintage USA -built Peaveys, Epi dot, Art & Lutherie (Canada). Too Long to list here. Asking $1200. Tnfn• nannic Rnnama_ dhonan- technique, composition. Teach- ing Guitarist's Growing Musicians. 802-655-5800, www.guitarscho- olofvermont.com. MUSIC LESSONS Piano, guitar, voice, theory, composition, song - writing. All ages, levels; styles. 20 yrs. exp. Friendly, individual- ized lessons in So. Burlington. Info: 802-864-7740, eromaill3@ gmail.com. ------------------------ Call to Artists ----------------------- BE SEEN! Boutique on Church Street Looking for artists to show their work for the busy retail month of August. No commission taken, art reception provided. Info: oneLove1515@hotmaiL.com. Creative Space BURLINGTON SPACE FOR RENT Great for artist/workshop, on Art Hop Route. Approx. 110 sq.ft., secure. $225/mo..CalL Andrea for more details, 802-355-0562. Openings/ Shows A CRY OF PLAYERS Written by William Gibson. A comedic drama about the early days of William Shakespeare. July 24-26, 7:30PM, July 27, 2PM, BFA Fairfax, 75 Hunt St. Info: Fairfax Community Theatre Company, 802-879-2867, www.fctcvt.org. ACT 250 NOTICE MINOR APPLICATION 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 application and nroposed permit are available' Yiew at the South Burlingt.. unicipaL Office, Chittenden County Regional Plan- ning Commission located at.30 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, and the office listed below. The application and proposed permit may also be viewed on the Natural Resources Board's web site (www. nrb.state.vt.us/lup) by clicking on "Act 250 Database," selecting "Entire Database," and entering the case number above. No hearing will be held unless, on or before July 29, 2008, a party notifies the District Commission of -an issue or issues requiring the presentation of evidence at a hearing or the commission sets the matter for hearing on its own motion. Any hearing request shall be in writing to the address below, shall state the criteria or s0criteria at issue, why a hearing is required and what additional evidence will be presented at the hearing. Any hearing request by an adjoining property owner or other interested person must include a petition for party status Prior to submitting a request for a hearing, please contact the dis- trict coordinator at the telephone number Listed below for more information. Prior to convening a hearing, the District Commission must determine that substantive issues requiring a hearing have been raised. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless the Commission holds a public hearing. Should a hearing be held on this project and you have a disability for which you are going to need accommodation, please notify us by July 29, 2008. Parties entitled to participate are the Municipality, the Municipal Planning Commission, the Re- gional Planning Commission, adjoining property owners, other interested persons granted party status pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c). Non-party participants may also be allowed under 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(5). Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this 9th day of July 2008. By /s/Peter E. Keibel Natural Resources Board District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/ 802-879-5658 E/ peter.keibel@state.vt.us BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Public Hearing Notice — August 5, 2008 The Burlington. Development Review Board will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room 12, City Hall to consider the following applications: 1. 09-022CA/VR; 185 Maple Street: ions M—A a\ o-I, c..._..,...,.-- o —1— For information call 865-7188 (865-7142 TTY). PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD- 08-35 of O'Brien Family Limited Partnership and O'Brien Home Farm, LLC to amend a previ- ously approved planned unit development consisting of 117 multi -family residential units in 16 buildings. The amendment consists of revising the property line of lot #4 to allow the as -built curb and paving of Eldredge Street to be completely within the City right-of-way, Eldredge Street & Hinesburg Road. 2. Appeal #AO-08-13 of Century Partners, LP & Tekram Partners, LP appealing the issuance of Notices of Violation #NV-08-17 and #NV-08-18 by the Administra- tive Officer for zoning violations at 100 & 102 Dorset Street & 2&4 Market Street. 3. Final plat application #SD- 08-36 of ALgimantas & Neringa Shama to subdivide a 70,630 sq. ft. parcel developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) Lots of 31,180 sq. ft. (lot 1) and, 39,450 sq. ft. (Lot 2), 1450 Hinesburg Road. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. July 16, 2008 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. S0946-07 CnC Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Plaintiff V. Jessica T. Lacey, Dean R. Lacey, Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB And Occupants residing at 7052 Main Road, Huntington, Vermont, Defendants NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and in execution of the Power.of Sale contained in a certain mortgage given by Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB to Jessica T. Lacey dated November 14, 2005 and recorded in Volume 88, Page 626 of the Land Records of the Town of Huntington, of which mortgage the undersigned is the present holder, for breach of the conditions of said mortgage and ®z ®*0, � ' n�im south urfin ton PLANNING & ZONING July 31, 2008 Algimantas Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: Final Plat #SD-08-36 Dear Mr. Shalna: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www,sburi.com rr- ► ® `�/ WE soot rlinton PLANNING & ZONING July 31, 2008 Gunner McCain McCain Consulting, Inc. 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: Final Plat #SD-08-36 Dear Mr. McCain: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD drb\sub\shalna\shalna fina12.doc nda #7 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: July 31, 2008 Plans received: July 14, 2008 1450 HINESBURG ROAD— 2-LOT SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-08-36 Meetinq date: Auqust 5, 2008 Owner/Applicant Algimantas & Neringa Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Contact Person Property Information Gunner McCain Tax Parcel 0860-01450 McCain Consulting Inc SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 93 South Main Street 1.6 acres Waterburv. VT 05676 Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna final2 ' : • Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking final plat approval to to subdivide a 70,630 sq. ft. parcel developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) lots of 31,180 sq. ft. (lot 1) and 39,450 sq. ft. (lot 2), 1450 Hinesburg Road. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on July 14, 2008 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Neighborhood Residential Zoning District Requirement/Limitation Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 31,180 SF + Max. Density-NR 1.2 units/acre base density (max of 4/acre with TDR) 1.33 units/acre** (1 existing unit) � Max. Building Coverage 15% 7.01 %** 4 Max. Total Coverage 30% 11.6%** Min. Front Setback 50 ft. _ Approx 60 ft. # 4 Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. � Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. 40 The acreage of the lot will not support one home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. No additional dwelling units shall be permitted on either lot without the transfer of at least one development right, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). ** Coverages are for Lot 1 which contains the existing home. # The front setback included is from Route 116/Hinesburg Road and pertains to the existing home on Lot 1. 1. No additional dwelling units shall be permitted on either lot without the transfer of at least one development right, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The purchase of the development right documents must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to recording the mylar. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna final2 The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast Quadrant. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Southeast Quadrant District This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district. Therefore it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR. 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning District. A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ- NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub- district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. No new buildings are proposed as part of this application; therefore this criterion is not applicable to this application. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels At this time, there are only two lots proposed. Staff finds that the proposed subdivision meets this criterion to the extent necessary at this time. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable subdistrict allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. The proposed subdivision is in compliance with this criterion with the exception of the density limitations noted above. Additional units may be permitted on the subject lots with the appropriate transfers of development right(s). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna final2 (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. At this time, no new development is proposed. Furthermore, there are no apparent wetlands on the site. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. At this time no construction is planned. Staff recognizes that this may change as the lots are developed and therefore this criterion would be better addressed at that time. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. At this time no construction is planned. This criterion is not applicable to this application. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. This criterion is not applicable to this application. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. At this time no construction is planned. However, the approval requested herein would for all purposes create a legal building lot and connections must be considered at this time. There is currently no connection from this property to the public water and sewer lines. The applicant has stated that they have sufficient capacity for an onsite well. However, there are not adequate soils to support an onsite septic system. The applicant is proposing a connection to CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna final2 the public sewer system across Highland Terrace. The City Engineer has reviewed this design and provided comments in a memo dated December 6, 2007 (attached). 3. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the City Engineer, per the memo dated December 6, 2007. The plans shall be revised accordingly. (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. Hinesburg Road is included among several corridors on the Official City Map for a proposed recreation path. Several properties along the road have already dedicated easements to the City. It is possible that this property is among those needed to complete the path along the corridor. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has reviewed the plans. They have verbally stated a request for a recreation path easement along Hinesburg Road. This is shown on the plans. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. Staff has already stated that the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has commented on this matter. (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. At this time no construction is planned and this criterion is not applicable. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. At this time no construction is planned and this criterion is not applicable. Should a new home be developed on Lot 2, it should be accessed from Highland Terrace and addressed as such. The Administrative Officer shall asses this should any residential units be proposed for Lot 2. 4. Any dwelling units proposed for Lot 2 shall be accessed from Highland Terrace. (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. No new roads are planned as part of this application CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna final2 (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. No new roads are planned as part of this application. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. No new roads are planned as part of this application. 9.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections.. (2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 400 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and 9-9 below. (2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna final2 Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. (4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4). (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5). (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets). (2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. (3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings should be set back fifteen feet (15') from the back of sidewalk. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. (6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing types. At this time no construction is planned. Staff recognizes that this may change as the lots are developed. The Board previously discussed this issue and decided not to enforce design review as part of this application. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna final2 RFr_OMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve final plat application #SD-08-36 subject to the conditional items included in the staff comments section of this report. Respectfully submitted, Cathyanri LaRose,' Associate Planner Copy to: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, applicants Permit Number SD- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) a�mun�aS a IJer�nag Sl..,.l�a, -4951 WAN, l� M: b\vn VT- os4,"s CQ.11 ASS - 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) --K4 % 310 -2,11 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address phone& fax #) MOAN.' q U\C(Ch M a',. (omo)hro, , ArC p p 21-I`1-SO93 9 Contact email address:grx� ��a;,,�o,�c�, ;.co���na care 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 1ySdines�urr� (Z 6) TAX PARCEL Ill # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) (-)!K- Ol4SC) 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Cx �nq r,;oa12 4nm& res-srence ors Rrcc\ A. b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) ea o o ll no ryLA.) sAes erroo xne a� SL -, �11re l c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) p-01-0 s - 942 �k d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) 2 Boor-, i ;� lv� �x,cp m�,� P X,��,, C, lb' t16 '4 e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) iY-",\Q " kt"�.M.\.A C'�C.Y1a nn n A-K rn M,. . - A \ f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) 0 A g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) SE a _ L(L p an,,, k. h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? , . b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: li©,Lo3o �, 4, �4�k (acres /sq. ft.) (ecwre-\'_ - 31,1 �D ; 1 2 - 391 -is.) b) Building Coverage: Existing 2,1S-o square feet 01 % e.A�_ Proposed O\N square feet N N % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): 2 Existing 3ta2Co square feet Il .C,o % o� ?orceA 1. Proposed NCR square feet NSA- % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed square feet % 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 0 A sq. ft. * *Projects disturbing more than on -half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking ji �A 12) COST ESTIMATES NiA -no rDk.) �oj.k&,n5 ore r�cr,J ak- N"% 3h;Nv a) Building (including interior renovations) $ b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC ( o,.t �xcsiV.� V-111� a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) to b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 3 c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) .3 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 0 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE NSF! 3 l 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS — please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 4 �-_• �••, ••,••••• — •• "+ va.r���.— ! 4 m�„l..HlIV l�U1V�LIL 11M� r'filt tl1l tl1 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted Which shows the information listed on ,Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I l" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application) fee is $125, I hereby certify that all the information requested a part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge, SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this Iine DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketol!r-plsn application and find it to be: Z�eo�wplete ,--)❑ Incomplete & Zoning or Designee ate Mom... �ML d �_.� Mw~• •� �� Z61FL17VZZ08 cc EOl6-6L8-Z08 EUMS 5161V ZZ44 04-LO-800Z McCain Consulting, Inc. July 14, 2008 Ray Belair Planning & Zoning Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 It RE: Subdivision Application (due to missed mylar filing) Shalna Property, 1450 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Ray, Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting Enclosed please find the following information in support of the above referenced project: 1. A complete Application for Final Subdivision Plat Review 2. A fee check in the amount of $261.00 (two hundred sixty-one dollars) 3. A list of adjoining landowners 4. A copy of the Warranty Deed to the property 5. A copy of the Protective Covenants for Parcel 1 6. Five (5) 24" x 36" copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copies of the site plan (Sheet 1 of 1, dated 8/20/07, last revised 7/11/08) 7. Five (5) 18" x 24" copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy of the survey prepared by our office (Sheet 1 of 1, dated 4/18/08) 8. Six (6) 11" x 17" copies of the 1969 survey prepared by James Ogden As you know, the project is located in the SEQ-NR District and involves the subdivision of parcel 0860-01450 into two lots. Parcel 1 will contain the existing single-family residence; Parcel 2 has no proposed development at this time. These materials are being submitted as the survey mylar for the original subdivision approval was not filed in a timely manner. Thank you and please feel free to call with any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Mc a ConV c. 7 _ . i Project Administrator Enc. Cc: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, w/ enclosures Joseph Fallon, w/out enclosures Y:\Projects\26's\26103\Town Resub 2008\TownResub.doc 93 South Main Street, Suite 1 • Waterbury, VT 05676 • (802) 244-5093 Tel. • (802) 244-7492 Fax Algimantas & Neringa Shalna Parcel 0860-01450 Adjoining Landowners Parcel Adjoiner 0850-00009 Douglas W. & Elaine Maynes 9 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0850-00040 John W. & Patricia A. Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01405 Homer L. & Marie J. Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01425 Joseph & Lisa K. Malley 1425 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01440 Judith M. Lavanway 1440 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Y:\Projects\26's\26103\Town Resub 2008Wdjoiners.doc f e N/F 0860-01405 d Homer & Marion 0860-014-40 Z Dubois Judith Lavanway Homer &Marie 297/442-443 50/415 Dubois I 1Y" IPF 8" reveal I o I I F pinched, no cap I I Underground ® pumphouse I" IPF flush S 8T28'01° E no cap" IRF I1° reveal bent & loose 19.89'" E no cop 250.70' — — I i 15' ► Parcel 1 I i � 'Apple .3%, 1rJO Sq.ft. i "— I Existing I Parcel 2 1 Driveway 18" Apple I 39,450 sq. ft. i W I I � ° I �q IW 0860-01425 I oit2 24" Maple I MIm 3 Joseph & ei = Existing Lisa Malley Drilled I Hxouseg Shed I Hedge Row 21 30o Well " Maple I ) 2' ZcH I F Ash I " p roximote I i ° exisfmg leachheld 15" Maple. 30"Male I I (6) 12" Red Pine Row W _ I 200.24' ' '� _ ., _ _N 86'S7'15" W 20' wide recreation 10' wide utility 1" IPF 4" reveal 246.59' — 71);fIPF patheasementeasement per 34/324 no capexcept within 1" revealE 5' radius of p existing drilled well 0850-00009 I e Douglas & Elaine Maynes 392/578-579 a I � I d � I � I 0850-00040 John & Patricia Trutor z 3 TITLE SOURCE: South Burlington Land. Records Warranty deed of Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller to Algimontos Shalna and Neringo Shalna, Book 754, Page 310-311, Dated 30 June, 2006. REFERENCES: 1) A plan entitled "Tract Plan - Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont, Property of Christian B. Hoskom Jr. & Hazel G. Hoskam,° scale 1" = 100', dated June 17, 1957, recorded Map Slide 19.5 of the South Burlington Land Records. 2) A plan entitled "Plan of Land belonging to C.B. Hoskam, South Burlington, Vt" scale 1" = 40', by James R. Ogden, dated July 26, 1969, recorded Map Slides 93 and 93.1 of the South Burlington Land Records. 3) Protective covenants in re: Country Garden Development, dated June 19, 1957, recorded Book 34, Page 324 of the of the South Burlington Land Records. NOTES: 1) This mop is based on the research of the South Burlington Lund Records, physical evidence fa-d- --id a fatal station traverse with a minimum precision ralio that meets the standards for urban surveys, set by the Vermont State Board of Land Surveyors Rules effective October 11, 1999, performed by Keith R. Van Iderstine and Scott A. Hazle in March, 2007. 2) There is included with Parcel 1 a right to water as described in a warranty deed of Roland E. Peterson, doing business as Peterson Construction Company, to Helen Puffer as well as rights to water as described in a water rights agreement from Merril and Hilda Gave to Helen B. Puffer, Dated October 31, 1957 and recorded in Book 34. Page 38 of the South Burlington Land Records. 3) Parcel 1 is subject to a 10 foot wide utility easement as per the protective covenants in re: Country Gardens Development, dated June 19, 1957 and recorded in Book 34, Page 324 of the South Burlington Land Records. 4) Except where otherwise noted, no attempt was made to identify and/or locate any easements or rights -of -way that may exist, either recorded or unrecorded. The Hinesburg Road (Vermont Route 116) right-of-way is assumed to be 4 rods wide and the Highland Terrace (Town Highway #146) right-of-way is listed as sixty (60) feet wide in the South Burlington Rood Index. 5) This subdivision is subject to the provisions of the City of South Burlington Final Plat Application ISD-08-19. 6) Bearings are based on Magnetic North, as observed by McCain Consulting, Inc., in March, 2007. 7) Research by Keith R. Van Iderstine. Map by Scott J. Herring GRAPHIC SCALE sacth it4" ? !„: ROJECT 40 0 zo so eo ie0 RECEIVED urtln t ,.r,l k I m �a7i,�/....- LEGEND 0. %i" Iron rod set flush (unless noted) IN FEET - ( ) 1 inch = 40 ft. y JUL 14 2WG with cop marked "VAN IDERSTINE 719" 0 Iron pipe found Q Iron rod found (jiffy of So. Burlington 0 Calculated point LSt Utility Pole — — Properly line — Right -of -Way line — — — — — — — Easement line SURVEY OF THE LANDS OF a Wooden fence x - Barbed fence line SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE VE�MO' ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA _ x wire Overhead utility wires 20 Received For record A.D. _ ;o°pDP g '- = S Burlington, Vermont Tree line at oclock minutes IKEITIpJyr Vermont Route 116 & Highland Terrace South v�� n _an. VA 36/792 Book 36 Page 792 of the Land Records and recorded in _ ` NO. 7191NE o ' r�r �r McCAIN liO1Vr.J VL1ING, INC. CONSULTING, Attest: 00 'n,FO ` SCALE 1" 40' PROJECT : Mc26103 Town Clerk J� x 'ro�ANDr„S`�p� 11 DRAWING: 26103sv 4-8-08.DWC 93 SOUTH :MAIN STREET „( WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 Keith R. Van Iderstine, LS. 719 This map complies with DATE: April 18, 2008 SHEET 1 OF 1 27 VSA 1403 and 26 VSA 2596 r Homer & Mark Dubois 0860-01405 Joseph & Lisa Malley 0860-01425 Latilude/Longituds Parcel 1 existing well N 44'-25-50A', W 073'-09'-21 2" Parcel I existing Ieochfield N 44'-25-49.8 W 073'-09 -19.8" Parcel 2 well N 44'-25'-50.4"; W 073'•09'-15.7" Center of Parcel N 44'-25-501% W 073'-09'-18.4" I IMAILBOX _ IRIF I I Judith Lo—way 0860-01440 1 Homer & Ma on Dubois 11 IPF _ �, �� -- 6PLE I 50/415 �-� 0SB 7 4a SB-6 IJ,L�A±C� 1 UNDERGROUND 200t �,�►� A1�JA, m G;J 1 1 ® PUMPHOUSE 1 1 rn T P- z 1 $ PROPOSED I IPF I I MANHOLE I n 1 I -3 TP 1110-10040 u c I IP GARDEN 'P1 'EL 1 058-1 11 ' GARDEN UN S I IT APPLE 1 i, -80—s F I PR TP• 470 1 GARCEE� 11 ' 1 EXISTING I PROPOSED I DRIVEWAY w DRILLED ® I 11 18" AP 8" APPLE II 1 w c < a WELL I{I HEDG ROW 1 1 � CA3DEN I H. w 1 1 EXISTING 24,MAPLE 1 PARCEL 2 5" ASH I 1 DR LLED \ 1 39,450 SQ.FT. 15"MAPLE 0 _ WELL 1 I w SB-5 I0—_APPROXIMATE LOCATION 1 ta58-4 1 EXISTING GREENH SE I 24" ASH 1 EXISTING ' pE WATER LINE HOUSE �1,111''''''"""""" n I 5" APPLE I (ASSUMED) 18- RED PI 1 EXISTING Q5SB-3 5" APPLE RI 1 1 I 1 UTILITY M (3) 6" APPLE 1 30" MAPLE E-AS4NG 058-2 EASEMENT > 11 =o PP�Of Ep�3� 1 WF PCk NO 1 — •- _ 6" APPLE 1 EXISTING vE TENTS I 6) 12" RED PINE ROW x �y FX I ( _ 1 W 11 SEPTIC TANK 1 1 247't 60' VADE RIGHT-OF-WAY RECRE4110N IPATN EASEMENT1 30" M I APLE 1 1 V 967't ��..� Douglas & Elaine Maynes WELL SHIELDII J, —, 0850-00009 1 1 GRAPHIC SCALE I Df PECr ) 1 mar. - z0 It. I Topography by Total Station ^ I Contoux Interval 2' / Assumed Datu+n. LEGEND -I Traverse point Well O� IPF Iron pipe found \J IRF an rod found (D PP Utility pole Tree .�, LatiludeAwgitude point c-- Guy wee x Barbed wire fence Wanden �ence r� Overhead power lines RECEIVED JUL 14 21 City of SO. BuMington 100 10' cankau. w.. e SITE PLAN r—tours FOR CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PERMITTING Tree line Properly line ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA ^�t +Rn7tjP' r PIE OP Right of way line �w y~ �'' TWO LOT SUBDIVISION > Ditch/droinage swale -27T a —W Water line ROUTE 116 & HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT TIFr � xp2 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE rF�„w° SCALE : I" = 20' MCCAIN CONSULTING, INC. J EOUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA SEC. 1403 FOR THE FILING DESIGNED BY: GNM PROJECT : #26103 OF SURVEY PLATS DRAWN BY: SJH/RHP 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET SITE TECICIAN: CHECKED BY: GNM WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 HN GUNNER 237caIN DATE: AUGUST ?0, 2007 SHEET 1 OF 1 Y: ` Cadd' 26000's` 26ID3 dw 28I03 7-I " Aw e t � 3 x' �s a N t ry 6tft 90 Y `%11tsurc Rea4 Sou-th burhojt6H , Yermon-V �r4 ja et ty o � Chrisli4n U. Haskawm Jr. -6- 14a 1 I�oska� TAN 1 jt49RX's OFFIGI Juno, 19 5 7 se. S7 t, ire, r� • R.i recla+� at o�' SAY o'clock k t Attu Tom" Clerk foal( Nc•ltp - to-�' - iT Z, Vol. 34 3 24 PROTECTIVE COVENANTS IN RE: COUNTRY GARDENS DEVELOPMENT Protective Covenants Country Garden Development In order to establish and maintain a housing development in a neighborhood which will afford a maximum of protection to home owners, investors, developers and the town of South Burlington in general, we, Christian B. Hoskam, Jr. and Hazel G. Hoskam, of Williston, county of Chittenden and State of Vermont, owners of the following -described property, do hereby declare the following Protective Covenants, on the following -described land: All of those lots of land shown on "Tract Plan -Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont Property of said Christian B. Hoskam, Jr. r and Hazel G. Hoskam, dated June 17, 1957 and recorded in Vol.,Maps, Page 307, of the Land Records of the town of South Burlington. I 1. Only one single-family dwelling house on each lot. 2. Lots shall not be subdivided.- 3. No building shall be erected altered or placed on any lot until a construction plan and a placement plan has been approved by said Christian B. and Hazel G. Hoskam. The approval shall be based upon harmony of external design with existing structures and placement with regard to topography and relation to placement of other structures. No fence or wall shall be erected, placed or altered on any lot unless $pproved by said Hoskams. 4. An easement for installation and maintenance of utilities is hereby reserved over the rear ten (10) feet of each lot. 5. There shall be no structure of a temporary character, such as trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage barn or out- building on any lot at acny times used as a residence or other purpose except under the terms of covenants #3• e. No activity shall be carried on of a business nature, ( not ordinarily associated with a residential section or which may become noxious or offensive, nor shall anything tee done on any lot which shall become or is any annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. 7. No animals, livestock or fowls are to be permitted on any lot except domestic pets 8. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except one professional sign of not more than one (1) square foot; or one sign or not more than 'five (5) square feet advertising the property for sale; or signs used by a builder �o advertise the property during the construction and sale period; or a developer advertising his lots. 9. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding upon all p&rties claiming under them for a period of twenty (20) years fr'oit' the date of the recording hereof, after which time these covenants shall be automatically extended for successive ten (10) year periods. Unless an instrument, signed by a majority of the then - owners of the lots in this development, has been recorded in the Land Records of the town of South Burlington, said instrument agreeing to change these covenants in whole or in part. 10. Poplar trees, elm trees or other trees having root systems which tend to disrupt foundation walls, sewage lines and other utilities shall not be set our or permitted upon said lands. 11. These covenants may be enforced at law or in equity. 12. Invalidation of any of these covenants by judgment or Court order or decree shall in no way affect any of the other provisions, which shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this 19thday of June, A.D. 1957. In Presence of: Richard H. Cowles W. R. Miner Christi.-m B. Hoskam Seal Hazel G._Hoskam Seal STATE OF VERMONT ) CHITTENDEN COUNTY) ss. At Burlington in said county on this 1:9th day of June, 1957 personally appeared Christian B. Hoskam, Jr. and Hazel G. Hoskam and they acknowledged the foregoing instrument by them signed and sealed to be their free act and deed. Before me, Richard H. Cowles Received for record June 19, 1957 at 11:45 A. M. .�g'—" fr 01 a „U 6 � � ' / ^_-------^�-_---�~-----__~ i / . | , v ^ . ' ' � ' ! � ` No Text 0860-01405 a Homer & Marie o Dubois I , Y d 0 I � I 0860-01425 Joseph & T� Liso Malley a I I � I1Y" IPF 8" reveal I /— pinched, no cap Underground r to pumphouse TITLE SOURCE: South Burlington Land Records Warranty deed of Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller to Algimanlas Shalna and Neringa Shalna, Book 754, Page 310-311, Dated 30 June, 2006. REFERENCES: 1) A plan entitled 'Tract Plan - Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont, Property of Christian B. Hoskom Jr. & Hazel G. Hoskam,' scale 1' = 100', dated June 17, 1957, recorded Map Slide 19.5 of the South Burlington Land Records. 2) A plan entitled "Plan of Land belonging to C.B. Hoskam, South Burlington, Vt' scale 1" _ 40', by James R. Ogden, dated July 26, 1969. recorded Map Slides 93 and 93.1 of the South Burlington Land Records. 0860-01440 3) A protective covenants in re: Country Garden Development, dated June 19, 1957, recorded Judith Lavanwcy Book 34, Page 324 of the of the South Burlington Land Records. 297/442-443 NOTES: } 1) This map is based on the research of the South Burlington Land Records, physical evidence o found and a total station traverse with a minimum precision ratio that meets the standards for I" IPF 21" reveal c urban surveys, set by the Vermont State Board of Land Surveyors Rules effective October 11, a I I 1999 performed by Keith R. Van Iderstine and Scott A. Hozle in March 2007 �"-..... S 8T28'01" E no cap �§" IRF 11" reveal o I 19.89' �4�3" E bent & loose � I 2) There is included with Parcel 1 a right to water as described in a warranty deed of Roland I v1 250.70' no cup p — E. Peterson, doing business as Peterson Construction Company, to Helen Putter as well as 1 rights to water as described in a water rights agreement from Merril and Hilda Gave to Helen 15" I 1 Apple Parcel 1 I 1 `I B. Puffer, Dated October 31, 1957 and recorded in Book 34, Page 38 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. I 31,15 sq. ft. Z —I I Existing I Parcel 2 d 3) Parcel I is subject to a 10 foot wide utility easement as per protective covenants in re: I Driveway Y 18" Apple I 39, 480 s t. Q f ) � Country Gardens Development, dated June 19, 1957 and recorded in Book 34, Page 324 of the I Y P 9 South Burlington Records. w J I a Land >- (O 24" Maple Ito t; 4) Except where otherwise noted, no attempt was made to identify and/or locate any 1 lir- 3 easements or rights -of -way that may exist, either recorded or unrecorded. The Hinesburg Road (Vermont Route 116) and Highland Terrace (Town Highway /146) rights -of -way are assumed to `-]Drilled Drilled I S 3 `�-i.? Existing House Shed Z Hedge Row I o be 3 rods wide. (Well I Maple I 0 I 130" I I NI cl 5) Bearings are based on Magnetic North; as observed by McCain Consulting, Inc., i I , ^`� I 2M1 Ash 0850-00040 n March, 2007. John &Patricia 1 a roxrmote I 1 a' y Trulor 6) Research by Keith R. Van Iderstine. Map by Scott J. Herring. exislin9leachheld I 15" Maple C 30" Maple ( N 86:4923" I 1 in) 12' Red Pine Row � I 199,88' _ _N 86'5723" W 20' recreation 10' wide utility iron rod 246.95' I path easement easement per 34/324 to be set except within 5' radius of exisling drilled well 0850-00009 o Douglas & Elaine Maynes 392/578-579 LEGEND 0 V Iron rod set flush (unless noted) with cap marked "VAN IDERSTINE 719" OIron pipe found OIron rod found C Calculated point & Utility Pole — — — Property line — Right -of -Way line — — — — — — — Easement line a Wooden fence Barbed wire fence line Overhead utility wires �M Tree line 36/792 Book 36 Page 792 of the Land Records GRAPHIC SCALE 40 o 20 40 Bo M ( IN FEET ) I inch = 40 It, o I E 0 Location Ma C�c � MqR 20 O'ti1 9a rfl + 31r� � � r e q ROJEC C� rrI v 5af p Of '"� SURVEY OF THE LANDS OF ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA -e Vermont Route 116 & Highland Terrace South Burlington, Vermont SCALE 1" ao' McCAIN CONSULTING, INC. PROJECT : Ma26103 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET DRAWING: 26103sv.DWG Keith R. Van Iderstine, LS. 719 WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 r DATE: January 8, 2008f SHEET 1 OF 1 J08EPH D. FALLON ATTORNEY AT LAW P. O. BOX 257, 10729 ROUTE 116 HINESBURG, VT OS461 (802) 482-2137 FAX (802) 482-2138 EMAIL Jfallon@madriver.com April 22, 2008 Mr. Ray Bei_air, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Highland Terrace Subdivision - Shalna - City of South Burlington Dear Ray: Relative to the above -entitled matter, enclosed please find a proposed Easement Deed and Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return. Please call with any questions or comments. Cordially /01 Joseph D. Fallon JDF:sjl Enclosures cc: Mr. and Mrs. Algimantas Shalna JOSEPH D. FALLON ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 257 10729 ROUTE 116 HINESBURG. VT 05461 (802) 482.-2137 EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT ALGIMANTAS SHALNA and NERINGA SHALNA, of Williston, in the County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, Grantors, in consideration of ------TEN AND MORE ------ Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipality located in Chittenden County, and State of Vermont, Grantee, by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, successors and assigns forever, a certain easement in the City of South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: PATH EASEMENT: Being a strip of land twenty (20) feet in width depicted as "20' recreation path easement except within 5' radius of existing drilled well" on a Plat of Survey entitled "Survey of the Lands of Algimantas &Neringa Shalna, Vermont Route 116 & Highland Terrace, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by McCain Consulting, Inc., dated April 18, 2008 and of record in Map Slide _ of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (Said easement has a uniform width of 20 feet except that it narrows within five feet of the radius of the existing drilled well as depicted on the aforesaid Plan.) Grantee and its successors and assigns shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave a bicycle and pedestrian path, with a traveled surface not more than 10 feet wide, including the right to install, maintain, repair and replace all necessary culverts, cuts, curbs and ramps, all at Grantee's sole expense. Grantors, themselves, and their heir heirs and assigns, shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within the easement area which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to use and enjoy the easement conveyed herein. No motorized vehicles shall be permitted on the pedestrian path, except any vehicle utilized by Grantee or its agents in connection with construction and/or maintenance of the path. BURDENED PARCEL: Said easement is conveyed over a part and portion only of the same land and premises conveyed to Algimantas Shala and Neringa Shala (sic should be Shalna) by Warranty Deed of Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller dated June 3, 2006, and of record in Book 754, Pages 310-311 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. RETAINED RIGHTS: a_ -L -1-47+1,- The within Grantors, their heirs and assigns, shall have ule rigI1t to n-,aAe use - L— easement area as shall not be inconsistent with Grantee's rights granted herein including, but not limited to, crossing the easement area for access purposes. By acceptance of this deed, the Grantee agrees that the Grantors retain the right to have the easement area considered and included as a constituent part of the whole of the Burdened Parcel for purposes of calculating setbacks, lot coverage, density and similar requirements of Town zoning and similar use ordinances. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY ON GRANTORS/OBLIGATIONS OF GRANTEE: By recording of this Easement Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantors lying outside the scope of the easements and rights of way which are in any way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted to it hereunder shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry by Grantee, its agents, employees, contractors, successors or assigns, as soon as reasonably practical at Grantee's own cost. The construction and maintenance of the bicycle/recreation path shall be the sole responsibility of the City of South Burlington, which shall indemnify and hold Grantors and their heir and assigns harmless to the full limits of liability insurance that they customarily maintain from any claims, liabilities (including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses) for personal injury or property damage arising from Grantee and its successors and assigns engaging in the activities permitted hereunder; provided, however, that such indemnity and hold harmless obligation shall not extend to any claim based upon the negligent or intentional acts of the Grantors and their heirs and assigns. Grantee, by the recording of this deed, acknowledges that the bicycle/recreation easement conveyed herein has been donated to Grantee, at no cost to Grantee, with the intent that Grantors shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. §2309. The intent and expectation of the parties hereto is for Grantors to have all the protections and benefits afforded to landowners by 19 V.S.A. §2309, as the same may be amended from time to time. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof, the references therein made, and their respective records and references, in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the we, said Grantors, ALGIMANTAS SHALNA and NERINGA SHALNA, for ourselves and our heirs and assigns, covenant with the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents we are the sole owners of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE except as aforesaid and except for easements and rights of way of record, if any; and we hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we hereunto set our hands and seals this day of May, 2008. ALGIMANTAS SHALNA NERINGA SHALNA STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this _ day of May, 2008, personally appeared ALGIMANTAS SHALNA and NERINGA SHALNA who acknowledged the foregoing instrument, by them sealed and subscribed, to be their free act and deed. Before me: JOSEPH D. FALLON ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 257 10729 ROUTE 116 HINESBURG, VT 05461 Notary Public My commission expires: 2/10/2011 (802)482-2137 VEh, ONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RE KN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S NAME (S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER IDENT NO. Algimantas Shalna 7951 Williston Road,Williston, VT 05495 Nerin a Shalna Same as above B BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER IDENT NO. City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Property Location (Address in Full): DATE OF CLOSING: /08 HinesburgRoad (VT Route 116)5/ 1. [] FEE SIMPLE 3. UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST 5. [] TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. [X] EASEMENT/ROW 2. LIFE ESTATE 4. UNDIVIDED _% INTEREST 6. ] LEASE 8. [] OTHER LAND SIZE (Acreage or fraction thereof) Special Factors: Have Development Rights been conveyed IXJ NO II YES Was Sale between Family Members IXJ NO IJ Yes State Relationship: Financin Conventional Bank J Owner Financin I Other BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. [X] NONE 5. [] FARM BUILDINGS 9. [] STORE 2. [] FACTORY 6. [] MULTI -FAMILY WITH DWELLING UNITS TRANSFERRED 10. [] OTHER 3. [] SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. [] MOBILE HOME YEAR: MAKE SER. NO. - 4. [] CAMP/VACATION HOME 8. [] CONDOMINIUM WITH UNITS TRANSFERRED CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER OCCUPIED [] RENTED [] WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. [] PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. [] CAMPNACATION 5. [] OPERATING FARM 7. [] COMMERCIAL 2. [] OPEN LAND 4. [] TIMBERLAND 6. [] GOVERNMENT USE 8. [X]OTHER N/A - easement PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. [] PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. [] CAMPNACATION 5. [] OPERATING FARM 7. [] COMMERCIAL 9. [X] OTHER N/A- 2. [] OPEN LAND 4. [] TIMBERLAND 6. [] GOVERNMENT USE 8. [] INDUSTRIAL easement WAS PROPERTY PURCHASED DOES BUYER HOLD TITLE BY TENANT: [X] NO [] YES TO ADJOINING PROPERTY: [X] NO [] YES CURRENT USE VALUE PROGRAM: IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER THE AGRICULTURAL AND MANAGED FOREST LAND USE VALUE PROGRAM CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. []Yes [X] No IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N AND O BELOW: 15. Transfer w/o consideration to municipal tyfor easement TOTAL PRICE PAID: PRICE PAID FOR PERSONAL 0 PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY: $0 PROPERTY $ $0 1 STATE TYPE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE, PLEASE DESCRIBE IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE O AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES P1 TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS 1 $0 DATE SELLER ACQUIRED: 6/23/2006 IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET: 10 Form PT -I (8/00) RATESCHEDULE Vi 3. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchasers principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) ( See Instructions) .................................. b. Value of property enrolled in current use program...................................................................................... c. Value of qualified working farm................................................................................................................. d. Add Lines ](a), (b) and(c)......................................................................................................................... e. Tax rate...................................................................................................................................................... f. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line l(d) by Line I(e)............................................................. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line O on front of return .............................................................................................. b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above.................................................................................. c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(a)............................................................................................................... d. Tax rate..................................................................................................................................................... e. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d).......................................................... Total Tax Due: Add Lines (1(f) and 2(e) and enter here and on Line P on front of return ........................................................ 1. a. b. $ c. $ d. $ e. 0.005 f$ 2. a. b. $ c. $ d. 0.0125 e. $ 3. $ FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyer(s) and Seller(s) certify as follows: A. That they have investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, if any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(s) advised the buyer(s) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may limit significantly the use of the property. N/A -EASEMENT ONLY C. That this transfer is in compliance with or is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and is in compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel retained: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office in your area to determine compliance with Act 250 (See map on page 26.) Seller(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of real property and any development thereon is in compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act 250), for the following reason: NA -EASEMENT ONLY 1. This property is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and is in compliance with said permit, or 2. This property is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from instructions) E. That this transfer does/does not result in a partition or division of land. Note: If it does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. N/A -EASEMENT ONLY WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION [] Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income Tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form RW-171 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): [] 1. Seller(s) certified that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. [] 2. Buyer(s) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner of Taxes in advance of this sale. [X] 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this is a transfer without consideration. (See instructions for Form RW-171.) [] 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee in a foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURES DATE AS 5/ /08 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON NS 5/ /08 By: 5/ /08 Duly Authorized Agent Pre arer's Signature: No certification is made by Preparer Prepared By: Joseph D. Fallon, Esq. Preparer's Address: PO Box 257, Hinesburg, VT 05461 Buyers Representative Tel. (Print or Type) Keep a copy or this return ror your recorus. Form PT-1 (8/00) r `lam southburlington PLANNING & ZONING March 25, 2008 John & Patricia Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com southburfington PLANNING & ZONING March 25, 2008 Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl, 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846,4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com gajs 5 hearing wilt be held unless, on before April 8, 2008, a party ifies the District Commission an issue or issues requiring presentation of evidence at earing or the commission sets matter for hearing on its n motion. Any hearing request It be in writing to the address ow, shall state the criteria or criteria at issue, why a hearing equired and what additional fence will be presented at hearing. Any hearing request an adjoining property owner )ther interested person must .ude a petition for party status. rr to submitting a request for earing, please contact the dis- t coordinator at the telephone fiber listed below for more rrmation. Prior to convening a ring, the District Commission ;t determine that substantive ies requiring a hearing have n raised. Findings of Fact and clusions of Law will not be fared unless the Commission Is a public hearing. uld a hearing beheld on this ject and you have a disability which you are going to need 3mmodation, please notify us %PH[ 8, 2008. ies entitled to participate are Municipality, the Municipal Ining Commission, the Re - ,al Planning Commission, pining. property owners, Other !rested persons granted party us pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 5(c). Non-party participants also be allowed under 10 A. § 6085(c)(5). ad in Essex Junction, Vermont, 12th day of March 2008. 's/Peter E. Keibel ,rat Resources Board rict #4 Coordinator West Street x Junction, VT 05452 02-879-5658 eter-keibet@state.vt.us 250 NOTICE OR APPLICATION /.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 Aarch 7, 2008, Technology Partners, filed application )190-8D for a project generally :ribed as: iges to the entrance plaza, ration of the sidewalk, addi- of a sidewalk to the parking deletion of the recreation relocation of the MTC cabi- shift the ROW of Community a, incorporation of revised spot find it here: www.sevendaysvt.com No hearing will be held unless, on or before April 8, 2008, a party notifies the District Commission Of an issue or issues requiring the presentation of evidence at a hearing or the commission sets the matter for hearing on its own motion. Any hearing request shall be in writing to the address below, shalt state the criteria or subcriteria at issue, why a hearing is required and what additional evidence will be presented at the hearing. Any hearing request by an adjoining property owner or other interested person must include a petition for party status. Prior to submitting a request for., a hearing, please contact the dis- trict coordinator at the telephone number listed.betow for more information. Prior to convening a hearing, the District Commission must determine that substantive issues requiring a hearing have been raised. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law wilt not be prepared unless the Commission holds a public hearing. Should a hearing be held on this project and you have a disability for which you are going to need accommodation, please notify us by April 8, 2008. Parties entitled to participate are the Municipality, the Municipal Planning Commission, the Re- gional Planning Commission, adjoining property owners, other interested persons granted party status pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 6085(c). Nonparty participants may also be allowed under 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(5). Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this 13th day of March 2008. By /s/Peter E. Keibel Natural Resources Board District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/ 802-879-5658 E/ Peter.keibel@state.vt.us CHARLOTTE PLANNING COM- MISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to Title 24 Chapter 117 V.S.A. and the Charlotte Land Use Regulations, the Charlotte Planning Commission will meet on Thursday April 17, 2008 at the Town Halt to hear the following application: 7:30 PM Final Plan Hearing for David Schermerhorn for a 4 lot subdivision reviewed as a Planned Residential Development. Property is located at 383 Hinesburg Road Application material can be viewed at the Planning and Zoning Mra Nrtirinnfinn in rhn hco.;nn Local Federation Applicants or Local Unaffiliated Organization Applicants may obtain 2008 appli- cation forms by visiting http:// www.oPm-gov/cfc/Charities/mod- eLcharityapp.asp. Completed applications must be submitted to Green Mountain United Way; 963 Paine Turnpike N#2, Montpelier, VT 05602-9163, Attn: Nancy Zorn by Wednesday April 9, 2008. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD-08- 18 of John Larkin and Cupola Golf Course to amend a previously ap- proved planned unit development consisting of five.(5) multi -family dwellings for a total of 160 units and a 40 unit congregate care facility. The amendment consists of: 1) reducing the width of the proposed public street from 30 ft to 28 ft and 2) site modifica- tions -to the two (2) multi -family dwellings on Larkin tot #2, Quarry Hilt Road. 2. Final plat application #SD-08- 19 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna for a boundary line adjustment be- tween two (2) previously approved tots, 1450 Hinesburg Road. 3: Preliminary plat application #SD-08-20 of Terry & Bethany Lieberman for a planned unit development consisting of one (1) lot developed with a single family dwelling. The purpose of the PUD is to obtain approvals for waivers to allow the building to encroach three (3) feet into the side set- back and 6.75 feet into the front setback, 44 Country Club Drive. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall.. March 26, 2008 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. S0179-07 CnC Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Plaintiff v. Stephen J. Morisseau, Amy L. Morisseau f/k/a Amy L. Demore, Beneficial Mortgage Co. of New Hampshire And Occupants residing at 77 Milton Falls Court, Milton, Vermont, Defendants Being Unit No. 4 along with 16.66 percent of undivided interest in the common areas and facilities of the Milton Falls II Condominium, so-called, situated on Lot No. 20 depicted on a survey entitled, Mil- ton Falls Subdivision Phase I and II, Milton Vermont Property Plat, drawn by Leonard Lamoureux, Dated April 21, 1988 and Recorded in Map Slide #32-B of the Land Records of the Town of Milton. Terms of Sale: $10,000.00 to be paid in cash by purchaser at the time of sale, with the balance due at closing. Proof of financing for the balance of the purchase to be provided at the time of sale. The sale is subject to taxes due and owing to the Town of Milton. Other terms to be announced at the sale or inquire at Lobe & Fortin, 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306, South Burlington, VT 05403, 802 660-9000, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. By: Corey J. Fortin, Esq. Lobe & Fortin, PLC 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306 South Burlington, VT 05403 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. SO453-06 CnC Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Plaintiff V. Robert L. Inselberg, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, Denis O'Brien, Isela O'Brien And Occupants resid- ing at 77 Westall Drive Extension, Richmond, Vermont, Defendants NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and in execution of the Power of Sale contained in a certain mortgage given by Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB to Robert L. Inselberg dated January 10, Z005 and recorded in Volume 161, Page 371 of the Land Rernrds of the Town of Richmond, of which mortgage the undersigned is the present holder, for breach of the conditions of said mortgage and for the purposes of foreclosing the same will be sold at Public Auction at 10:00 A.M. on April 16, 2008, at 77 Westall Drive Exten- sion, Richmond, Vermont all and singular the premises described in said mortgage: To Wit: Being all and the same land and Premises conveyed to the Mort- gagor herein by Warranty Deed of Denis P. O'Brien and Iseta M. O'Brien dated January 10, 2005, and recorded in Volume 161, Page 369 of the Town of Richmond Land Records. Terms of Sale: $10,000.00 to be Armel Mends -Cole And Occupants residing at 122 Shelburne Road, Burlington, Vermont, Defendants NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and in execution of the Power of Sale contained in a certain mortgage given by Countrywide Home Loans,.Inc. to Armel Mends -Cole dated October 23, 2006 and recorded in Volume 978, Page 253 of the Land Records of the Town of Burlington, of which mortgage the undersigned is the present holder, for breach of the conditions of said mortgage and for the purposes of foreclos- ing the same will be sold at Public Auction at 2:15 P.M. on April 2, 2008, at 122 Shelburne Road, Burlington, Vermont all and singular the premises described in said mortgage: To Wit: Being all and the same land and premises conveyed to Travis Lapointe and Karra Gonyeau by Warranty Deed ofJutta Rentrop and Wilhelm Rentrop dated April 24, 2004 and of record in Volume 868, Page 172 of the Burlington Land Records. Terms of Sate: $10,000.00 to be paid in cash by purchaser at the time of sale, with the balance due at closing. Proof of financing for the balance of the purchase to be provided at the time of sale. The sale is subject to taxes due and owing to the Town of Burlington. Other terms to be announced at the sate or inquire at Lobe & Fortin, 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306, South Burlington, VT 05403, 802 660-9000. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. By: Joshua B. Lobe, Esq. Lobe & Fortin, PLC 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306 South Burlington, VT 05403 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. rHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. S0363-07 CnC LaSalle Bank National Associa- tion, as Trustee Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2006, GSAMP Trust 2006-HE3, Plaintiff V. - Richard C. Rearic, Mortgage Elec- tronic Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for SouthStar Funding, LLC And Occupants residing at 125 Kennedy Drive, Unit 21, South Burlington, Vermont, Defendants NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and in execution of the Power of Sate contained in a cer- tain mortgage given by SouthStar Fundino. I I r to ui, kh i t o April 11, 2008 Gunner McCain McCain Consulting 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: 1450 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. McCain: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, �&L --- ��, �� Betsy McD nough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Algimantas Shalna 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD drb\sub\s halna\revised_bou ndary. doc nda #6 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: April 10, 2008 Plans received: March 20, 2008 1450 HINESBURG ROAD— 2-LOT SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-08-19 Owner/Applicant Algimantas & Neringa Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Contact Person Gunner McCain McCain Consulting Inc 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Location Map Meeting date: April 15, 2008 ,'It 'r , ft Property Information Tax Parcel 0860-01450 SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 1.6 acres CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\revised boundar PROJECT DESCRIPTION Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking final plat approval for a for a boundary line adjustment between two (2) previously approved lots, 1450 Hinesburg Road. COMMENT Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on March 20, 2008 and have no concerns regarding the proposed boundary changes. Minimum lot sizes for both lots and setbacks and coverages for the existing single family home are being met. Staff continues to note that the total acreage will not support one home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. No additional dwelling units shall be permitted on either lot without the transfer of at least one development right, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). All previous stipulations regarding the prohibition of any additional dwelling units without appropriate transfers of development rights remains in effect. Staff recommends that the Board approve final plat application #SD-08-19. Respectfully submitted, Cathya4r� LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, applicants I � I MAILBOX IRF I Judith Lavanwoy 0860-01440 Homer & Morie Dubois IPF _ �wi I 1 b• APPLE 0860-01405 I _ _ (658 7 IaSB6 LI,,LL�ACyy UNDERGROUND 200'} ��� I m S:l 1 ® PUMPHOUSE 1 I N TPo 2 I \ I MPROPOSED ANHOLE I II -' d � � S I I Ja B. Palricio Trutar 1 Ii PFYA�� ES QL 1 i 1 cARDEe S 1 oesa0004o I 15 LE 11 GARDEN e��YH-�JQ F 0SB-I. 470 EXISTING GAPOEM I 1 1 DRIVEWAY w ! II AE� 1.y aj - PROPOSED t 1IT" APPLE i I w a AP 8AELL ® I. — II HE ROW \ I I �GARIIEN—_I 'r µ 1 I DIISIIN 24" MAPLE 1 1 PARCEL 2 5' ASH I e, HELL APPRO%IMA 11 �B 15" MAPLE SB 5 J TE LOCATION 39,480 SQ.FT. 0 �-'_--_- W ON EXISTING I 058-4 d Joseph h I §a Mnlley r*I EXISRNG I" pE W HOUSE GREENH SE e'� 24 ASH 0860-01425 1 5" APPLE t WATER LINE '^' L (ASSUMED) IT RED PINE 1 EXISTING 0SB-3 5" APPLE A Ily I 11 1 UTILITYE �¢ (3) 6 APPLEPF I 30' MAPLE Cy\SSG 0SB2 ( EASEMENT (OP NpWfr\El FvL-W 6' APPLE 1 EXISTING Ey,'lF-N1 (6) 12" RED PI00 NE ROW �'� x 60' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY — 1 a SEPTIC TANK I I 70 ATN EASE MFw I 11 A 30' MAPLE 1 1 1613 Douglas @ Elaine Maynes I 0850-00009 GRAPHIC SCALE 1� lo - irs-i—fi111� - n IN FEET 1 i ) ch _ Ea fL. L 1 \ Topography by Tolai Station E C 1 I Contour Interval 2.. +� O/ \ Assumed O¢Eum Location MapMAR 2 LEGEND4 ci" 0f v / 00'-I Traverse pointWell P f 4l eyF �VJI�r��}�sn. © IPF Iran Pipe found 0 IRF Iron rod found 4 PP Utility pole Tree µ aY. ♦�� LatitudeAwgitude point ( e7 .Y ¢{; 'IV, C— Guy wie 8tl fh (... i" A. �1 ROJEC 2 OB REVISE BOUNDARY LINE LOCATION, RENUMBERED SHEET, MISC. z Daybed wire fence Btir1117i 2f 12 4 7 ADDED EASEMENTS, REVISED PROPOSED PROPERTY UNE, MIX ° Wooden fence I I I_ ¢I d 11 6 07 JADDED NEW TORO, MSC. LatiludfAcingitude 0 Overhead power lines r,,,, aaS- c"-��p( Parcel I existing well N 44-25-50.0 W 073'-09'-212' 100 ,D' aantouIs - ,�°." SITE PLAN Parcel , existing leachfuid N 44'-25-498•. W 073'-09-19.8 r contours FOR CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PERMITTING Parcel 2 well N 44-25-50.4', W 073'-OP'-15J• "-��� TALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA Tee line line _ � Center of Parcel N 44'-25-503' W 073' 09' 184' Properly line Right of woY line - n � (1O TWO LOT SUBDIVISION > Difch/drairmge —le — W Water fine ` ` .�' Y Gp� ROUTE 116 &HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT THIS IS NOT A SURVEY TARS PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE O4' SCALE : I" = 20• - MCCAIN CONSULTING, INC. REQUIREMENTS OF 21 VSA SEC. 1403 FOR THE RUNG '' DESIGNED BY, GNM PROJECT : #26103 OF SURWY PLATS' ,�y0� DRAWN BY: SJH/RHP 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET cxecEED BY. cwM SITE TECHNICIAN:WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 GUNNER MCCAIN B-237 DATE: AUGUST 20, 2007 SHEET 1 OF 1 a t � Permit Number SD- 00 --1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) ceh I- �55 - 9495 ' 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) --Sy 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address phone& fax #) wcii'Q,�0ay a v-; 0,561 co Contact email address: CC p ✓�1CCA,nCcx�S ��� �g Ca,-r J 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) d$(0 - 01950 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) ,e.x;Ah!;, me USA (ba-c�' n n c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) � � _ i �:, �4. �n,�4�;n� rv� mm� 1 gnat' c�� ��S �:✓� d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) 2 Doaff, 1p y,p `) �, 1,� PxZ� nG . 0 IV 1 R J e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 0 Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) 0A g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) ;(:6 - &a ­0;� h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, Il, or III) on the subject property? b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: ?u i '6�o q0 (acres /sq. ft.) b) Building Coverage: Existing 21 %(,square feet S.2 % Proposed ON square feet QtA % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): K Existing t1 Q2(0 square feet IS. („ % Proposed &)�h square feet ► )A % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed square feet _ % 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: ►J A sq. ft. * *Projects disturbing more than on -half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking ►11A 12) COST ESTIMATES 0A _ oo ram,,, b,,Y 1S are eraco�ec_) 4 'k5 V14�,q a) Building (including interior renovations) $ b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC ( tg\A fx�sng �co�Q) a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) to b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION ,USN 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 3 J 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS — please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATU&F,OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: U T 1 i nave reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: �, com 1 p ete /1") ❑Incomplete of Pla g & Zoning or Designee Dat 4 Algimantas & Neringa Shalna Parcel 0860-01450 Adjoining Landowners Parcel Adioiner 0850-00009 Douglas W. & Elaine Maynes 9 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0850-00040 John W. & Patricia A. Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01405 Homer L. & Marie J. Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01425 Joseph & Lisa K. Malley 1425 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01440 Judith M. Lavanway 1440 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Y:\Projects\26's\26103\2008 Town\Adjoiners.doc WARR M DEED 3F"cMs or -so". PC N SYREI-7 Tim- vca .� :z-ar99 KNOW ALL PERSONS B Y THESE PRESENTS that We, Jack Hyde and Paula D. er, of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantors, in consideration Of TEN OR MORE Dollars paid to our of Williston in full satisfaction by Algimantas S gala and Neringa Shala; the County of Chitteuden and State of Vermont, Grantees, by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEYAND CONFIRM unto the said Grantees, Al Neringa Shata, husband and wife gin'antas Shala and tenants by the entirety, and their heirs and certain piece of land in the City of South Burlington in the County oun of Chi assigns forever, a Vermont, described as follows, viz: ty ttenden And State of E1 Being all and the same land and premises conveyed to Jack Hyde and Paula D- Miller by Warranty Deed of Daniel E. Wright dated September 15, 2000 and ofrecord in Volume 485 on Pages 276-279 ofthe City of South Burlington Land Records and being further described as follows: `Being all and the same (ands and 'Being t by amean premises conveyed to Daniel E_ Wright and Beatrice L. Wright (I 1975, and recorded in V Deed of Gerald Vaillancourt and Wilima 1. Vaillancourt dated October ohmic 126, Page 66 of the City of South Burlin gton Land Records. Lands and premises with residence thereon follows: consisting of two separate parcels ooland described as P1el 11 : A lot of land with residence thereon, the dwelling house bet No- 1450 Hinesburg Road; situated on the easterly side of Hinesbur ng known and designated as particularly described as Lot #1 as shown on a Plan entitled 'Tract P g Road, said lot being more Burlington, Vermont --property of Christian B. Hos entitled and iaa — Hinesburg Road, South t 957, and of record in Volume 11, l�ta P Haul O- Hoskam ,dated lone 17. Said lot has a frontage on HinesburgRoad. t of the city ofs°uth Burlington Land Records, southerly line of 200 feet eac westerly line of 154-6975 feet, a uortherly and k, and an easterly line of 154.6975 feet Being all and the same [ands and premism con�re of Helen B. Puffer, dated May 28. t 969 Yed to the within Grantors by the Warranty Deed Burlington Land Records , recorded at Volume 91, Pages 99_91 ofthe City of South This conveyance is made subject to certain protective covenants, includiin a utility the rear 10 feet of the lot herein conveyed, dated hme 19, 1957, g n' easement -over of the City of South Burlington Land Records." at Volume 34, Page 324 This conveyance includes the right to water as set forth in the WarrantRoland E. y Deed of g doing business under the the name and style of petersonterson Construction all rights to water, and duties associatedforth Co,�=to Helen Puffer and also Merrill E. Cove to Hilda 'Y_ Gove to He�rgw with October 331in a t•, 195 , and Agreement fmin Volume 34, Page 38 of the City of South Burlington land Records. record in Parcel 2 : A lot of land lying easterly of the aforementioned Parcel #l, said lot having a westerly tine of 156.99 feet, a northerly line of 250.72 feet an easterly l ar .,€ , �s 246.85 — ..,, 50. and a southerly line of I ., stilt tot being designated as Extension to Lot #1 as shown on a Plan entitled 'Plan of LAW OFMCE6 OF OLVOORID, oVERTON & wusom PC MAim ,� 5EX iVNCnON, VERMON7 oS45;Z a '4 Land BeA-.jginb to C.B. 7S 4 0 Hoskam, South Burlington, Vermont, Lames R_ 1969Ogden Land Surveyor, South Burlington. Charlotte, Vermont, dated July 26. ', recorded at Volume 180, P ages I t 6 of the ry of Being all and the same lot of land conveyed to the within Grantors by the Warranty Christian B. Hoskam and Hazel C. Hoskam dated August 2!, 1969, t' Deed of 334 6 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, recorded at-Vohrme 91, Pages To said deed, plan of land, the records thereof and to an deeds and records therein referred to reference's hereby made in aid of this description_ TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the rivile es and a thereof, to the said Algimantas Shala and Nerin a Shala husband and wife, tenants appurtenances and their heirs and g assigns, to their own use and behoof forever• by the entirety, Paula D. Miller, Grantors, for ourselves and our heirs , and We, the said Jack Hyde and Grantees, Algimantas,Shalaand Nerin a and do covenant with the said of these presents we are the sole owners f the premises, and and signs, that until the ensealing same inhave good right and title to convey the manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY aforesaid, and Vile do hereby engage to W ENCUMBRANCE, except as ARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. 2006, We hereunto set our hands and seats this 3 6 day of June A.D. IN THE PRES O -• Witness IN WITNESS WHEREOF, STATE OF VERiwlONT COUNTY OF'CHITTENDEN, SS. Jack Hya'e`—�J� Paula p, Miller � At 01 t k%k/ Personally appear this 3 0 day oflune A-D_ 2006, Jack Hydee,2d:,-&t la D_ appeared, and they acknowledged this instrument, em Miller their free act and deed. eribed,to be Vernv3nt Property Transf&l me 32 V S.A. Chap 231 -"i ri VAJYVLr-U0LMtN I- Notary Public W'Tk "N RrC J-TAX Paid UOARU OF W-ILTH CENT. P—FC'0. VT LA140 UsEE ? P, MS ACT CERT, RECD c .2s iF:��c�a�fr/cml] -lerk My commission expires. 2/10/07 C ENO M II Vol. 3)t "—...• 3 2 PROTECTIVE COVENANTS IN RE: COUNTRY GARDENS DEVELOPMENT Protective Covenant Country Garden Development In order to establish and maintain a housing development in a neighborhood which will I afford a maximum of protection to home owners, investors, developers and the town of South Burlington in general, we, Christian B. Hoskam, Jr. and Hazel G. Hoskam, of Williston, county of Chittenden and State of Vermont, owners of the following -described property, do hereby declare the following Protective Covenants, on the following -described land: All of those lots of land shown on "Tract Plan -Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont Property of said Christian B. Hoskam, Jr. and Hazel G. Hoskam, dated June 17, 1957 and recorded in Vo1.,Maps, Page 307, of the Land Records of the town of South Burlington. i 1. Only one single-family dwelling house on each lot. 2. Lots shall not be subdivided.- �. 3. No building shall be erected altered or placed on any lot until a construction plan and a placement plan has been approved by said Christian B. and Hazel G. Hoskam. The approval shall be based upon harmony of external design with existing structures and placement with regard to topography and relation to placement of other structures. No fence or wall shall be erected, placed or altered on any lot unless approved by said Hoskams. 7- 4. An easement for installation and maintenance of utilities is hereby reserved over the rear ten (10) feet of each lot. 1. There shall be no structure of a temporary character, such as trailer, basement, tent, shack, garagebarn or out- building on any lot at any times used as a residence or other purpose except under the terms of *covenants #3. b. No activity shall be carried on of a business nature, not ordinarily associated with a residential section or which may become noxious or offensive, nor shall anything Le done on any lot which shall become or is any annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. 7. No animals, livestock or fowls are to be permitted on any lot except -domestic pets 8. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except one professional sign of not more than one (1) square foot; or one sign or not more than five (5) square feet advertising the property for sale; or signs used by a builder io advertise the property during the construction and sale period; or a developer advertising his lots. 9. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties claiming under them for a period of twenty (20) years from' the date of the recording hereof, after which time these covenants shall be automatically extended for successive ten (10) year periods. Unless an instrument, signed by a majority of the then - owners of the lots in this development, has been recorded in the Land Records of the town of South Burlington, said instrument agreeing to change these covenants in whole or in part. 10. Poplar trees, elm trees or other trees having root systems which tend to disrupt foundation walls, sewage lines and other utilities shall not be set our or permitted upon said lands. 11. These covenants may be enforced at law or in equity. 12. Invalidation of any of these covenants by judgment or Court order or decree shall in no way affect any of the other provisions, which shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this 19thday of June, A.D. 1957. In Presence of: Richard H. Cowles W. R. Miner Christian B. Hoskam Seal Hazel G. Hoskam Seal STATE OF VERMONT ) CHITTENDEN COUNTY) ss. At Burlington in said county on this 19th day of June, 1957 personally appeCLred Christian B. Hoskam, Jr. and Hazel G. Hoskam and they acknowledged the foregoing instrument by them signed and sealed to be their free act and deed. Before me_ Richard H. Cowles Received for record June 19, 1957 at 11:45 A. M.___.��a , . S►9.S f Alt 3Sou B rH 1�0 ¢7 trl 1 N , ✓ero" o n-t- Property v F Chas i 3. Woskam Jr. N}os6k, art } ©FFcc } F. June I `1, 1967 ,I , ldt., 1`? 6-7 _ - RWAW io tedl *d at .,I S�5 �o'cicxk . %w& d in Vel l 4 . Attest Tqum Clerk Conn Nalp e ,S cale McCain Consulting, Inc. March 19, 2008 t* Ray Belair Planning & Zoning Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting RE: Application for Amendment to SD-07-53 Shalna Property, 1450 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Ray, Per your request, enclosed please find $1.00 (as the fee is now $161.00 rather than $160.00) and five (5) 18" x 24" copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy of the preliminary survey (Sheet 1 of 1, dated 1/8/08) for the above referenced project. I have also enclosed five 24" x 36" copies and one I I" x 17" copy of the revised site plan (last revised 3/19/08), revised to correspond with the survey (see square footage and northern property line of Parcel 1). I believe this is all you need; please contact me when the date for the hearing has been determined. Thank you and please feel free to call with any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, McCain Consulti nc: 9 icole Fitc Project Administrator Enc. Cc: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, w/ enclosures Joe Fallon, Attorney, w/ enclosures Y AProjec[s\26's\26103\2008 Town\Town 3-19-08.doc 93 South Main Street, Suite I • Waterbury, VT 05676 • (802) 244-5093 Tel. • (802) 244-7492 Fax McCain Consulting, Inc. March 11, 2008 Ray Belair Planning & Zoning Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Application for Amendment to SD-07-53 Shalna Property, 1450 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Ray, Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting Per your instructions, enclosed please find the following information in support of the above referenced project: 1. A complete Application for Final Subdivision Plat Review 2. A fee check in the amount of $160.00 (one hundred sixty dollars) 3. A list of adjoining landowners 4. A copy of the Warranty Deed to the property 5. A copy of the Protective Covenants for Parcel 1 6. Five (5) 24" x 36" copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copies of the preliminary site plan (Sheet 1 of 1, dated 8/20/07, last revised 2/26/08) 7. Six (6) 11" x 17" copies of the 1969 survey prepared by James Ogden The project is located in the SEQ-NR District and involves the relocation of the recently - approved boundary line between Parcels 1 and 2, to the location (depicted on the survey prepared by James Ogden in 1969) from when the parcels were originally separately conveyed to an owner prior to the Shalnas. Parcel 1 contains the existing single-family residence; Parcel 2 has no proposed development at this time. Please contact me when the date for the hearing has been determined. Thank you and please feel free to call with any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincer-'- Mc_Caj icLo e Project Administrator Enc. Cc: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, w/ enclosures Joe Fallon, Attorney, w/ enclosures YAProjeast26s126103U0N TownUmnAmenddoc 93 South Main Street - Waterbury, Vermont 05676 - (802) 244-5093 Tel. - (802) 244-7492 Fax Haney W Morie Dubois 0860-01405 Latituds/Lmgltude I - - Judith Lavanway - 0860-01440 I IPF UNDERGROUND i ® PUMPHOUS �Q1 IPF - 1 i P EL I I 15 APPLE li GARDEN H�8 $ 1 II I GARDEN I = 47 19ppD EXISTING GARDEN 1 I DRIVEWAY a { 1 1 18" AP 8 APPLE 1 I HE Ro 1 � I 1 GARLEN I �w'1w z 1 EXISTING D 141 I 1 1 DNILL£' MAPLE 1 1 J y&LL I APPRO7MATE LOCATION I I y W EXISTING I 24' ASH Joseph & Liso MalleyI W -1 EXISTING ;" PE WA HOUSE GREENH SE 1111���''' 0860-01425 1 5' APPLE 1 (ASSUMED) WATER LINE 18" RED Plryt I EXISTING OSB-3 I 10 yADE I I M 5 (ASB-2 I I EASETINENT 1 6 1 �lE 35� 1 I (6) 12' RED FINE ROW SEPTICTANK I IPAiH EASEMENt I. I 30' MAPLE 1 1671 Douglas & Elaine Moynn 0&50-00069 GRAPHIC SCALE � �Ittttt�i- IN FEET) 1 Inch - 20 It. Topography by roial Station ^ I Contour Datum /n 2' u! / \ Assaed DDatum Parcel I acting weN N 44'-25'-50.0"; W 073'-09'-21.2' arce Pl I aiding leachlield N 44'-25-49.8': W 073'-DV-19.8' Parul 2 well N 44'-25'-50.4'; W 073'-09'-15.7- Center of Parcel N 44-26-50.3"; W 073'-09'-18.4' LEGEND Traverse point ® WeN IPF Iran pipe fond OO IRF Irm rod fa ind (Sl PP UtNity Pole Tree .� Latilude/Lmgilude point �— Guy wire x Barbed wire lence a Wooden fence Overhead Power lines 100 10 molars 2' contours J Tree line — — Property line — Right of way line > Ditch/droiiage swale — W Water line APPLE 6 4aSB-7 0SB-6 LILAC 10 PARCEL 2 39,480 SQ.FT. Is MAPLE �SB'4 24Yt � APPLE i I MAILBOX _ IRF I u 1 I 1 5� S 5 1� PROPOSED DRILLED �® I 1 5' ASH I 0 SB-5 1 57 APPLE 1 IPF 60' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ' & Poldcia Trular 0850-00040 I I I I I SITE PLAN FOR CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PERMITTING ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA TWO LOT SUBDIVISION ^���Gp{� ROUTE 116 & HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, INC.T THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE SCALE : 1" = 20' MCCAIN CONSULTING, C REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA SEC, 1403 FOR THE FILING 111 DESIGNED BY: GNM PROJECT : #26103 OF SURVEY PLAM ,DO`S DRAWN BY. SJH/RHP 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET SITE TECHNICIAN: CHECKED BY: GNM WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 GUNNER d 26D00'3 26103' dw 26103 3-19-08.dw B237 DATE: AUGUST 20, 2007 - SHEET 1 OF I April 16, 2008 Gunner McCain McCain Consulting 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: Final Plat Application #SD-08-19 1450 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. McCain: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on April 15, 2008 (effective 4/15/08).' Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 180 days (must be submitted & recorded by October 10 2008) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 5522 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DECEMBER 11, 2007 Mr. Dinklage agreed there are traffic issues at the Jughandle and felt there may have to be a traffic light at the end of East Terrace one day. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-07-85 of Ralph DesLauriers, Jr., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Behr seconded. Motion passed 5-0. 7. Sketch Plan Application #SD-07-73 of Cupola Golf Course, Inc., and John Larkin to amend a previously approved plan for a six -lot subdivision. The amendment consists of narrowing the pavement width of 1050 feet of proposed public road from 30 feet to 24 feet, Quarry Hill Road: Mr. McClellan said they are suggesting the road be narrowed and parking not be allowed on it. Mr. Dinklage noted the question of adequacy of parking has always come up. People end up parking on adjacent streets. He asked why the applicant would limit parking here. Mr. McClellan said there is adequate parking on site and there is no reason to park on the road. Mr. Dinklage noted the Director of Public Works does not like this idea. Ms. Dooley noted there is a 34-unit building and the parking lot for residents is always completely full. Sometimes parents wait in their cars for school buses on that street. A straw poll showed that no Board member would support the reduction in road width. Mr. McClellan noted the approval they got was for 30 feet. The current regulations call for 28 feet. He asked if they would have to come back for 28 feet. Mr. Dinklage suggested they work with staff on this. Mr. Plumeau rejoined the Board. 08." Continued Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-07-53 of Shalna to subdivide a 1.61 acre parcel developed with a single family antas dwelling into two lots of 0.61 acres and 1.0 acres, 1450 Hinesburg Road: Mr. McCain noted there is a house on the property now. There are no development plans for the second lot at this time. He also noted that the plan shows a sewer connection to Dubois Drive. Mr. McCain indicated they will agree to the rec path but asked if that affects the setback. Mr. Belair said it did not. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-07-53 of Algimantas Shalna subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Behr seconded. Motion passed unanimously. City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 southburfi-rigton yr RMON I January 9, 2008 Gunner McCain McCain Consulting 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: Minutes — Shalna Dear Mr. McCain: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved December 11, 2007 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. incerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. (802)846-4106 — phone (802)846-4106 — fax plannin g g @sburl.com 11/16/2007 15:23 802244740' MCCAIN CONSULTII."" ' PACE 01/01 i wd: S.�ialna hearing http://mail.mocainco,,Ming.com/egi-bin/viativmail.cxciid=UlZtb96 From: NlCole Fitch <nfitch*mccainconsulting.com> To. CLarose@sburi.com Cc: Date: Friday, November 16, 2007 11:07 am Subject: Fwd. Shatna hearing -----Original Message ----- From. Nicole Fitch[mailto:nfitch@mccainconsulting.com] Sent., Thursday, November 15, 2007 02:34 PM To: clarose@sburl.com Subject. Shatna hearing Cathy, Per your discussion with Gunner, please postpone Shalna from the November 20th hearing to the next. Thanks Nicole Fitch Attachments: CITY tVF SOUTH BUR LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING &ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 6, 2007 Gunnar McCain McCain Consulting 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: Shalna Property Dear Mr. McCain: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday December 11, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 'Horne of permit requirements in ode (a comply with applicable stale I \� rules concerning potable water supplies and wastewater systems, a person shill not construct or sect any structure or building an this lot if the use or useful occupancy of that stmctare or building w01 require the installation I MAILBOX of a connection to a potable water supply or wastewater system, without first complying with the applicable rules and obtaining any required permit Any person who owns this property acknowledges Wnl this lot may not be able to meet stale standards for a potable water rupp4y or wastewater - lip"= system and therefore this lot may not be able to be improved.' _- - � a I z Judah Lovanway 0860-01440"— _ I m — J - J� I a 6' APPLE f�'s Ilomer & Marie Dubois I EXISTNG /( 0860-07405 ) ® DRILLED 201011 WELL L �--� / % / DTP-2^ � LILAC m wAWxat T PROPOSED PA CF ` ;I IE REPLACEMENT %��. oS ' 1 BRE 30,920 Q. FT. "/ • GARDEN EE x v 1 15AP LE GARDEN AFT R-26-0 S .FT. iP EXISTINGnot not GARDEN 82 1 DRIVEWAY v `1v 1 1� �7 vs 8' APPLE vs v, HE ROW - vsv �13 1—�- Q '\ / / / '� PARCEL 2 1 2 MAPLE BEFORE Q s A514 I 39,480 SQ.FT. IS MAPLE 0 5' APPLE APPROXWATE LOCATION x'7 AFTER 43,770 SQ. FT. -5 Joseph h Lisa Malley os �"Iw ��—W'--�_�� H%USED f./(i (/ '/ / id59-4 _ 0860-01425 s' EXISTING WATER LINE nnn, vi GREENH01 S� , // / / / 24" ASH 1 A EXIS ING v DRILLED / ' / // 5' APPLE 1 1 WELL i y6Av lop q�//, I 4w58-3 I 30' MAPLE ENs�W� (bSB-2 ODi i� �/i� I (3 6 APPLE PF JET 1 - Ez1SnNc Silt NS5A— �E'k M RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 SEPnC TAW /,//// 2471: 1 6' APPLE (5) 12' RED PINE ROW 3T MAPLE J' _ Douglas k Elaine Mathes � o a I �E _ — �� OtJ50-00009 I I NOTES Sal Information Septic Tank and Building Sne, Test pits excavated on 7/12/07 Bill Zabiloski, ANR. Essex Junction Present to Observe 1) Canhoctor to verify a 1000 gallon concrete septic lank retro-fit with an access riser to grade, and on effluent tiller. SB-I 0' -13• Brown topsoil loam Prelreolrrnenl: Few faint mottles 0 10" IS-36' Gay brown loamy sill 1) Con(ac( designs when replacement is needed. Common distinct mottles Seepage O 29' Faw Main: SB-2 1) Pmfam a hydrostatic leakage lest of the lace man at 50 psi 0' -10' Brown topsoil loan and hold pressure fa two hours. 10•-36' Gay brown loony sal ail Lefield - Performance Based Approach Design Notes (Replacement) : Common laint mollies 0 10' Seepage 0 30" 1) Assume a Three bedroom house. Doily Flow (DF) 0 140 gpd/br = 420 gpd SB_3 2) Maximum application role fa filtrate in a mound • 2.0 gal/sl/day 0' -6" Brawn topsoil loam 3) Required Ir.,h area: DF/AR • 420 gpd / 2.0 g/sf/day • 210 sl Common lain( mollies 0 6• 4) Actual area: one trench 0 4' x 100' - 400 of 6" -3• Gay brawn loony sill Leochfleld - Construction Noln, Common distinct mourn 1) Contact designs when replacement is needed.-4 Maples O 6• Inspections and Certification. SB_5 Mottles O 6' Ij Contact designs when iepide—erd is needed. SB-6 Deldlr. Mottles 0 6' 1) Contact designs when replacement Is needed. SB-7 0-7" Brown topsoil loam 7' 40' Mottles 0 7' GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET I 1 Inch - 241 It. Topography by Tatal Stniian Contour Jntesvai 2 Assnslted Dist—, RECEIVED 9( ra 2007 Latilnde/Longilude y11�.. �,e O Existing well location N 44'-25'-50.0': W 073'-09'-21.2" Existing leachfield N 44-25'-49.W,W 073'-09'-19.8' City O( I SO. BUI .E III s� Ig�Oh1I l Replacement leodnlield N 4C-26-505: W 073'-OW-19.5• This design is la a septic system to replace a laing spleen at the sits. This is a best fi: solution and as such it may or may not be in conformance with current septic system design regulations. H is the opinion of the designer that (his design complies with the intent of splk regulations which is to present the crenuon of hedth hazards which include, but are not limited to: mulocnew g sage: contaminated drinking rotsa au , groundwalsurface insure water; to odequa(e drainage related to the proper function of sewage d'aposd area. and (o na re that facilities are designed, constructed, operated. and maintain in a manna (ha( will promote sanitary and heat hfd conditions. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA SEC. 1403 FOR THE FILING OF SURVEY PLATS. LEGEND Trawse point ® Well QIPF Iran pipe (nan d �\ IRF V Iron rod found Q Pp Utility pole e Tree ,�. LobtudeAangilude pant C— Guy we Barbed wire lence Wooden fence Overheod power lines 100 10' contour 2' cantours Tree line — properly line — Right of way line > Ditch/drowmge swde —W Water line I I I I I IJohn & Patnci. Truta 0050-OW40 I I I I I I I I SITE PLAN ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA TWO LOT SUBDIVISION ROUTE 116 & HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT SCALE : I" = 20• McCAIN CONSULTING, INC. DESIGNED BY: CNN PROJECT : 126103 DRAWN BY: SJH/RHP 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET CHECKED BY: GNU ENGINEER WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 LAZ PETER PE- 8930 0E P.E.DATE: AUGUST 20, 2007 SHEET I OF 3 LEGEND GAS METER GRAPHIC SCALE "OTP'I To —se paint ON SIDE OF ,Sr se OIPF Iron Doe found HgISE Iron rod found - END HEDGE ROW PRON PROPOSED ANMOLE + STORM aDRAIN .00y�IRF IN V Wola shut off calve — STORM DR 1 inch - 50 50 fL m0 Cmuete monument —' Q Sewer m.nhde �� � ANHOLE Topography by Total Station ❑ _ _ PROPOSED MANHOLE 3 �� EXISTING Contour Interval 2' Storm drain _ �— DRIVEWAY W j • Assumed Dmtum 300 10' Contours 1 _—� W — EXISTING 8' q� STORM 3 DRAINS 7 contaura �— 35 PVC SEWER 11P WATER MAN W I Tree line PROPOSED MANHOLE 7 G•� � ��' ��•"` 1 EXISTING J IRF IItgR.NTU TERRACE � W Ere � 12� STORY GRAN ATER MAW Properly line ' � — FIECIRICAL VAULT FROM SEWER ENE STUB (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) FROM VESSEL RESIDENCE — Riyn1 al .ay I:,e _ EXISTING - " r r^ DEPTH UNKNOAN 1 NOTE. > Ditch/drainage sale EXISTIN DRIVEWAY _ I CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BEFORE — 5 Sewer fine PROPOSED M T DRIVEN Y _ YOU OIG (qO-SAFE) AND VERIFY THE 10 vT I LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR To ELECTRICAL VAULT CONSTRUCTION. DM T _ 8 8 ?JI; _ MAII HOLE 2 MST ABO ILL STOPAND SEINE LINE T PE ORAN REPLA \ \ TER AC 'J[U; g € PROP D 3 --- TY Ot FUET 8 a � g TOLM € z CON INTI 4ECT DR EXISTIh UN FIR STORN ED Qf' 8 R -V 'A 04M .5a 1+00 I's) 3+/D N'A 3r00 3.5o 1100 Om 5100 S+so 6I00 eN0 HW I.51) MOp 8+50 8.e1) 9+50 low SEWER LINE PROFILE HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" _; 50' VERTICAL SCALE I" = 5' DUSTING MANHOLE rEXISTING MAM40 E INVERT IS 10 5 0 esiw��j 0 50 100 t50 HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" = 50' VERTICAL SCALE 1" = 5' Ieau a rren RECEIVED City of So. Burlington SEWER LINE PROFILE ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA TWO LOT SUBDIVISION ROUTE 116 & HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT lY4Gp}� SCALE : I" = 50• MCCAIN CONSULTING, INC. }OS DESIGNED BY: GNM PROJECT : #26103. DRAWN BY: WDB 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET ENGINEER: CHECKED BY: GNM WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2007 SHEET 2 OF 3 PETER VT P EO8930K' P E Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 Algimantas and Negrina Shalna 1450 Hinesburg Road- 2 Lot subdivision December 6, 2007 The plans submitted on December 6, 2007 by McCain Consulting Engineers are acceptable with the following modifications: 1. The plans should be revised to approximate location of a well to serve lot 2. 2. Gravity sewer main should be 8 inch and bedded in crushed stone. 3. The sewer main grade should be adjusted at its north end where it ties into Ledge Knoll 4. Parcel 2 should include a 15 foot utility easement for water and sewer to lot 1. Except for number 4, these recommendations were discussed with Mr. McCain. I bk nc� SOUTH BL.cLINGTON DEVELOPMENT RE` __."W BOARD 18 September 2007 Cider Mill project when that is possible. The applicant is also proposing an escrow bond on lot #5 to address the gap that will need to be completed. Mr. Belair distributed a memo from Jay Nadeau at the Water Dept. who is OK with the escrow agreement. Mr. Belair raised the issue of timing. He noted that at this time, no development is planned on Lot #5, so there is no need for a condition in this approval motion. When the applicant has a plan to build on Lot #5, they will have to come in and the condition would be placed at that time. Mr. Nadeau would like the bond at this time. Mr. Perry explained that the applicant is spending a lot of money to reach lots 1-4, and he didn't feel there was a reason to tie up money at this point. Mr. Dailey said he would agree that there be no development on lot #5 until they return to the DRB. Stipulation #4 of the approval motion was amended to delete all language after "September 17, 2007." Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-07-54 of William E. Dailey, Jr., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Continued Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-07-45 of John Illick for a planned unit development to amend an existing 72,000 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of: 1) installing three utility cabinets in the front yard, 2) adding a nitrogen tank, and 3) miscellaneous site modifications, 55 Community Drive: Mr. Belair advised that the relocation of the right-of-way has not yet taken place because of the 30-day notice requirement. He suggested continuing the application for another month. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Final Plat Application #SD-07-45 of John Illick until 16 October 2007. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. C5.) Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-07-53 of Algimantas Shalna to subdivide a 1.61 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into two lots of 0.61 acres and 1.0 acres, 1450 Hinesburg Road: Mr. McCain said the existing house will be on the .61 acre parcel. The applicant will provide a 20-foot rec path easement on Hinesburg Road. Mr. Dinklage reminded the applicant that the accessory shed must be 5 feet from the property line. Mr. McCain said it will either be moved or removed entirely. Mr. McCain noted that the property does not meet the requirement for on -site water or sewer. Mr. Dinklage recommended that the application be continued until there can be a -2- SOUTH BLrd.INGTON DEVELOPMENT REX __'W BOARD 18 September 2007 determination that lot #2 can be served with water and sewer. Mr. McCain said the plan is to access it from Highland Ave, and the draft decision says they have to address all issues before a permit will be issued. He felt the issues would be addressed. Ms. LaRose said staff feels the Board should review the details of the sewer line connections. Mr. McCain said there is a municipal sewer on Dubois Drive. They did present a conceptual sketch as to how they would do the connection. Mr. Wessel asked if it would be a gravity or pump sewer. Mr. McCain said it would probably be gravity, but there may be a ledge issue. Ms. Truder asked about the building envelope on Lot #2. Mr. Belair said it would have to meet the setback. Mr. Lavanway said that he is concerned with runoff from this property to his property. Ms. Truder asked how the sale of TDRs on a single -lot development works and questioned how that plays into the intent of Southeast Quadrant zoning. Mr. Dinklage said infill was anticipated with the change to the zoning regulations. The intent is to make development more dense closer to the "core." Ms. Quimby moved to continue Final Plat Application #SD-07-53 of Algmantas Shalna until 6 November 2007. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Miscellaneous Application #MS-07-10 of Terry & Sally Ryan for approval to remove existing seasonal cap and replace it with a single family dwelling with a 1482 sq. ft. building footprint, 117 Holmes Road: Mr. Boisvert said they will comply with the height limitation. The house will be served by municipal sewer and water. They also propose to shorten the access road. Mr. Dinklage acknowledged receipt of a letter from the abutting neighbor who has no objection to the plans. Mr. Weisman said it appears the applicant will be raising the level of the lot at least 3 feet and questioned whether that will affect drainage. Mr. Boisvert said they will raise the level 2 feel and will add a drainage structure to address that issue. Mr. Weisman asked what happens if it doesn't work. Mr. Ryan said Mr. Weisman can hook onto the system. He added that he gets drainage from the Weisman's lot now. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-07-10 of Terry & Sally Ryan subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-07-48 and Final Plat Application #SD-07-49 of 518 Corporation for a planned unit development to amend a previously approved plan for a 24,749 sq. ft. retail and office -3- Z) To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: John and Patricia Trutor 40 Highland Terrace So. Burlington, VT 05403 Date: September 18, 2007 Re: Final plat application #SD-07-53 of Algimantas Shalna to subdivide a 1.61 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into (2) lots of 0.61 acres and 1.0 acres, 1450 Hinesburg Road. We respectfully request that the DRB provide comment on the following statements and questions: We did not receive notification of preliminary review. Were letters sent to abutting property owners? 2. The existing home on 1.6 acres has been listed with MLS since 8/07 but is described as .5 acres. 3. We have been advised by the planning office that the purchase of a TDR is necessary for this development. Having just sold TDRs, we believed that they would be used to increase the density of new neighborhoods, or other large development projects. What is the minimum lot size required to sub -divide using a TDR(s)? 4. Does the purchase and transfer of TDRs for a single lot sub -division negate the intent of the SE Quadrant zoning regulation? Stated differently, does the purchase and transfer of TDRs make the SE Quadrant zoning formula meaningless? 5. There is no identified building envelope on the preliminary plan 6. There is no identified sewage system on the preliminary plan. 7. There is no identified water source on the preliminary plan. 8. Is there a plan to bring city utilities to our neighborhood? 9. Please respond to the obvious changes in character of an existing 30 yr. neighborhood. For example: Will there be a requirement to maintain the existing hedgerow, except to allow for driveways? Development of 6 possible new lots on the west side of Highland Terrace generates safety issues associated with the narrowness of the road. Will the city install sidewalks and lighting? Is the roadbed built to support housing with only a 20ft. setback. ) J) 10. If you do not maintain the integrity of the hedgerow, and property owners begin to request permits to cut it down, you will leave the fronts of homes facing the backyards of other homes. Is this consistent with acceptable city planning practices? CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD drb\sub\shalna\shalna 2lot final.doc DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: December 6, 2007 Plans received: August 24, 2007 & December 6, 2007 1450 HINESBURG ROAD- 2-LOT SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-07-53 Agenda #8 Meeting date: December 11. 2007 Owner/Applicant Algimantas & Neringa Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Contact Person Property Information Gunner McCain Tax Parcel 0860-01450 McCain Consulting Inc SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 93 South Main Street 1.6 acres Waterbury, VT 05676 Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21ot final PROJECT DES R/PRON Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking final plat approval to subdivide a 1.6 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) lots of 0.61 acres (lot #1) and 1.0 acres (lot #2), 1450 Hinesburg Road. The sketch plan was heard on May 1, 2007 (minutes attached). The final plat plan was first heard on September 18, 2007 (minutes attached). Several previous final plat hearings have been continued until this date. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on August 24, 2007 and December 6, 2007 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Neighborhood '' Requirement/Limitation Proposed Residential ZoningDistrict Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF .. 26,630 SF �• Max. Density-NR 1.2 units/acre base density 1.33 units/acre** max of 4/acre with TDR 1 existingunit Max. Buildin Covera e 15% 8.2%** Max. Total Coverage 30% 13.6%** Min. Front Setback 50 ft. Approx 60 ft. # �l Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. 40 The acreage of the lot will not support one home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. No additional dwelling units shall be permitted on either lot without the transfer of at least one development right, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). ** Coverages are for Lot 1 which contains the existing home. # T he front setback included is from Route 116/Hinesburg Road and pertains to the existing home on Lot 1. 1. No additional dwelling units shall be permitted on either lot without the transfer of at least one development right, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The purchase of the development right documents must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to recording the mylar. There is currently an accessory structure (shed/greenhouse) located on the property. When the property is divided per the proposal, the shed will be located very close to the property line on Lot 1. An accessory structure must be located at least five feet from the rear and side property lines. It is unclear how close the shed is but must be five feet from the property line. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21ot final 2. The accessory structure (shed) shall be located so as to be at least five feet from all property lines and shown on a revised site plan and survey plat. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast Quadrant. 3. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Southeast Quadrant District This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast auadrant district. Therefore it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR. 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning District. A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ- NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub- district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. No new buildings are proposed as part of this application; therefore this criterion is not applicable to this application. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels At this time, there are only two lots proposed. Staff finds that the proposed subdivision meets this criterion to the extent necessary at this time. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drblsub\shalna\shalna 21ot final (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable subdistrict allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. The proposed subdivision is in compliance with this criterion with the exception of the density limitations noted above. Additional units may be permitted on the subject lots with the appropriate transfers of development right(s). (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. At this time, no new development is proposed. Furthermore, there are no apparent wetlands on the site. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. At this time no construction is planned. Staff recognizes that this may change as the lots are developed and therefore this criterion would be better addressed at that time. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. At this time no construction is planned. This criterion is not applicable to this application. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. This criterion is not applicable to this application. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21ot final At this time no construction is planned. However, the approval requested herein would for all purposes create a legal building lot and connections must be considered at this time. There is currently no connection from this property to the public water and sewer lines. The applicant has stated that they have sufficient capacity for an onsite well. However, there are not adequate soils to support an onsite septic system. The applicant is proposing a connection to the public sewer system across Highland Terrace. The City Engineer has reviewed this design and provided comments in a memo dated December 6, 2007 (attached). 4. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the City Engineer, per the memo dated December 6, 2007. The plans shall be revised accordingly. (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. Hinesburg Road is included among several corridors on the Official City Map for a proposed recreation path. Several properties along the road have already dedicated easements to the City. It is possible that this property is among those needed to complete the path along the corridor. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has reviewed the plans. They have verbally stated a request for a recreation path easement along Hinesburg Road. They have stated that they will have a representative available at the hearing to discuss this matter with the Board. 5. The survey plat shall be revised to show a recreation path easement along Hinesburg Road at the direction of the Development Review Board. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. Staff has already stated that the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has commented on this matter. (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number andlocation _f hydrant allu IVI.QIIVII VI Ilj/Ufdf1LS. At this time no construction is planned and this criterion is not applicable. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 2lot final At this time no construction is planned and this criterion is not applicable. Should a new home be developed on Lot 2, it should be accessed from Highland Terrace and addressed as such. The Administrative Officer shall asses this should any residential units be proposed for Lot 2. 6. Any dwelling units proposed for Lot 2 shall be accessed from Highland Terrace. (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. No new roads are planned as part of this application. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. No new roads are planned as part of this application. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. No new roads are planned as part of this application. 9.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections.. (2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 400 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). k3) Ct___t Connection t_ AJ7_7117�� P1_i__1_ Street _t__1__ ____ _______'.__J t_ L_ L__71t t_ t1__ t�� �ue�� �.unnecuun w r►u�uinn�y raic�w. �u��t swiss MU [t:4U11VU w UV uunL w ulc property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21ot final collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and 9-9 below. (2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. (4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4). (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5). (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets). (2) Building Fagades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. /O\ P�_�a rf__e�_c-_ _ k'l) rrunt Building Setbacks. in pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings should be set back fifteen feet (15') from the back of sidewalk. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21ot final (6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing types. At this time no construction is planned. Staff recognizes that this may change as the lots are developed. The Board previously discussed this issue and decided not to enforce design review as part of this application. The plans should be revised to remove the notes and lines referring to "original property line." The two (2) original lots have merged thereby eliminating the original property line. 7. The plans should be revised to remove the notes and lines referring to "original property line. " The two (2) original lots have merged thereby eliminating the original property line. Staff recommends that the Board approve final plat application #SD-07-53 subject to the conditional items included in the staff comments section of this report. Respectfully submitted, Cathyan LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, applicants 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Work to be Done A. Furnish and install opproxhnalely 1028 feel of 6 inch SOR 35 PVC sewer line. B. Furnish and instal four (4) concrete manholes to grade. C. Locate all underground utilities and structures necessary to do the work. D. Notify the Engineer in advance whenever an existing pipeline conflicts with the proposed locotims aI the work. E. Perform all necessary tests to show satisfactory installation of the project components. Perform project startup. F. Restore all disturbed surfaces in accordance with the erosion control plans and details. 1.2 Submittals Required A. The contractor shall submit o compete conslruclion schedule which will include the slat and Irish dales of the work items inSection 1.1 and testing requirements in Section 4.0, B. Submit manufacturer's cut sheets for OR piping to be installed. C. Guarantee: The Contractor shall provide a will" guarantee to replace any defective part Or parts supplied, Including lobo, without change for me (1) year staring from the dale of the inspection and start-up. 2.0 PRODUCTS 2.I Materials - General A. All ppe delivered to the job site shall be Clearly marked at the factory with the Gass of pipe, the manufacturer's identification, and all else as required by (he codes, standards and specifications referred to under this section. Omission of this Information, will be cause far rejection of pp.. B. Caps ad nPlugs - Watertight and producing the same joint conditions as the pipe on which the cop or plug is placed. C. Foundation - Except as otherwise specified far specific piping materials, crushed store foundation material shall conform to the requkemerls of Type C III as specified. 2.2 PVC Sewer Pipe A. Sewer ppe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM Specificatim 3034 for SDR 35 pipe. B. The pipe shall be colored green for n-ground idenlllkotion of sewer pipe. C. Provisions must be made fen conaWdno and exponsim at each Oh[ with a rubber ring. The bell shall consist of an integral "I section with o solid cross-section rubber ring, factory assembled, securely locked in place (o prevent displacement Gang assembly. 2.3 Premst Concrete Manholes) A. Concrete manholes will be built to ASTN Specification C748-88 B. Concrete shall be 40DO-PSI concrete, 28-day strength. C. Sled reinforcing shall meet ASTM specifications 0.12 sq in. per vertical foot 0. Flexible manhole sleeves far sewer pipe connections shall conform to ASTM Specification C-923, G. Sealant between concrete sections and frames shall be a minimum I -inch butyl joint sealant meeting the requirements of ASTM Specifioo(im C-990. H. Malerkis used in frames and covers shot meet a exceed ASTM Specification A48-76, Class 30 1. Ladder is to be sled reinforced copolymer propoleyle. 2.4 FYI Materials A. Type A - Crushed Gravel Crushed grovel shall consist of hard, sharp, clam material. It shot] be free from any considerable mnt of not, laminated or elongated Particles and shall be free from shells, clay, limestom one,. dolomitic materials, shale or other deetenom matte. The crushed store To gravel shall be supplied, graded an follows: Scree' or Sieve Size Percent Passing by Weight 2 inches 100 1-%inches 90 to 100 No. 4 30 to 60 No. 100 0 to 12 No. 200 0 to 6 0. Type B - Said 1. Send shill be Gem, hard, durable, uncoated panicles of quartz or other rack, free from lumps of day, soft a flaky muteid, loon, organic or other deleterious material. In no case shall sand containing lumps at frozen material be used. 2. Send shots contain not mare than 3 percent find than No. 200 save, using AASHTO Method T-II. 3. Send shall be uhflarra graded from coarse to fine and shall meet the lotlowng gradation requirernentsi Screen or Sieve Size Percent Passing by Weight K inch100 3/8 inch 85 to 100 No. 4 60 to 100 No. 1635 to 80 No. 5010 l0 55 No. 100 2 to 10 4. The above gradation represents the extreme limits, which shill determine suitability far use from all sources of supply. The gradation Iron my one source shall be reosmobe, uniform and not subject to the extreme Percentages of gradation specified above. C. Type C - Common ITT 1. Type C Common FRI shill be Gem, free from lumps of frozen material, clay, soft or flaky material, loan, organic or other deleterious ma(etol. 3.0 EXECUTION 3.1 Pipe Installation - Generd A. Unless otherwise specified in these specifimtnns, an the drowngs, or directed by the Engines, provide bedding under the pipe of a mnB irmum of six inches of Type Sond fill for all ppelnes. B. Install ppe and fittings so that there wit be no deviation at the joints and so that inverts present a smooth surface. Pipe and fittings, which do not fit together to form a light fitting jowl are not permitted. C. Whenever pipes require mltng, a wheel culler, hydraulic ppe culler a pipe saw, satisfactory to the Engines shall be used Cutting pipes with a cold chisel a cold alter will not be allowed. D. Instal pipesinthe locations and to the required lines and grades as shown anthe plows, using an approved method of control. E. Maintain the excavation free of water during the progress al the work. No pipes shall be laid in wall. Ina shill there be any pints mode up in wale. No separate dlowonce tar pumping or otherwise removing water wit be made. All slides Or cave-ins of the breaches or cuts shall be remedied at the expense of the Contractor and to the satisfaction of the Engines. F. Maintain cleanliness of installed pipe and fitting inleias throughml the work. Plug ends When lipsIaslallofkn is not in progress Drainage of construction excavations through new pipes is prohibited. G. Preparatory to making pipe joints, all surfaces of the portions of the pipe to be jointed, or of the factory made jointing material, shill be clean and dry. No jointing of the pipes Will be permitted in a wet trench or wet excavation. Gaskets, lubricants, primers, adhesives, etc., shall be installed and 0ABL1 as recap, eel by from pipe or pint manufacturer's Specifications. Gaskets and other prating materials shall be projected n damage at all times Gaskets and jointing materials shall be inspected before installation of (he pipe, and any loose or improperly affixed gaskets and pining materials shelf be removed and replaced to the satisfactim of the Engineer. The pipe shall be aligned with the previously installed pipe, and the joint shall be inspected to be sure (hot the pant has been properly made and is light. If, while making the joint, the 9oskel ar jointing materials became loose or misplaced, the pipe shall be removed and the joint remode to the satisfaction of the Engineer. The joints shall be made in a workmmlMe manner so as to obtain (he degree of water tightness required. H. l mFirmly compact backfRf material around the pipe. Cover the pipe and compact by hand or mechanical lomping pond 12 inches above the lop of the pipe. The balance of the bockfll la the lop of the trench shop be conpocled by mechanical tamping or by means of vibratos, subject la the approvd of the Engines. Jelling and pudding may be permitted with the approwl of the Engineer only, and incompliance with the wrims other sections of these specifications. 3.2 Sewer Line or Force Mon and Wale Line Crossovers A. Sewer or farce mans crossing water Ines shad be laid beneath the water lire with at least 18' of vertical seporation. If the sews line must be laid above the water line, then: I. The sewer must be constructed to water line standards (ASTM D2241 for SDR 26 pipe) far a minimum distance of 20 feet to either side of the water line, 2. The crossing shalt be arranged m that one full length o1 sewer line is centered over the water line, 4.0 TESTING 4.1 Testing Buried Non -Pressure Pipe A. General: 1. Tests shall be cmducled by, and at the expense of, the Contractor under direction of (he Engnee. Tests shut be continued Until all leaks have been made light to the satisfaction of the Engineer. 2. Conduct tests after trench is backfilled. B. Gravity Lines: I. infiltration - Tesl the lines far inftlratmn by memurng (he flow in the completed line. Memurnq. instruments and labor shin be provided by the Contractor. No nfilhatim shall be acceptable. If any joint shows leakage it shall be repaired. 2. Extiltrolion - Test (he lines far exfltrotion by hydrostatic or or test. The hydrostatic water tests shall consist of a. Minmum of 2 (set of head over upstream end. b. Minimum of 6 feel of head over downstream end. C. Adjust head alter one hour. d. Measure loss of water during next hour. e. No nififration will be acceptable. a. EHold 4A testing by pressurized or shall be according to the Rome,ov Procedure and the following: psg greater than average groundwater back pressure with no pressure drop far 10 minutes. GRADE LOTH DEPTH AS PER PLANS DEPTH AS PER PLAN, 4 1/2 FOOT MWYIM 4' AM WSUTARON DIRECTLY OAR WE ANERE BUPoAL IS LESS MAN COARSE GRNULAR SACKFel 4-1/2 FEET /� MMMM COAR OVER MPE 6 1 `l fi' STAR 35 PA SERER LINE TD BE 2C e' SAID OVER I 21 —+-I 8mO01 all C" SEWER TRENCH DETAIL (NOT TO VALE) ....,....` 1'-I I/Y CLEAN "Alto OMSHEO STORE MIhL(ROAD) J PE4"PERFERAIED PTC PDDL SIDEvw vv ore ..3T PaAMnD+E 1 h1 _--- COMPALffO SANG II �� S. Suit 35 Pw 24' —� SEWER UNE SEWER TRENCH WITH CURTAIN DRAIN DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) USE m- HNGED ACCESS COAR, CAST WON FRAME AND Co" MM EIAWER STOMER RING MARKED '$E' O LADDER L� 1� O O MANHOLE (NOT TO SCALE) ALL INLETS, OUTLETS TO BE WATER -TIGHT. USE RUBBER GASKETS, EXTERIOR OF MANHOLE TO BE WATERPROOFED. RECEIVE :, DEC 0 6'_" rNiv of .9n RI ilfinnfnn — TYPE C SAND 12' COM ACTED TYPE A CRUSHED GRAVEL - SPECIFICATIONS & DETAILS o� ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA TWO LOT SUBDIVISION �y4Gp}� [ROUTE 116 &HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 4�� o =WDB MCCAIN CONSULTING, INC. 'NM ROJECT : a26103 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET ENGINEER: WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 PETER C. LAZORCHAK, P.E. DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2007 SHEET 3 OF 3 VT P.E. 8930 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 12, 2007 Algis Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: Final Plat Application #SD-07-53 2-lot Subdivision Dear Mr. Shalna: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, 4t qm*--b� Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant S�M-M -Rct CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to eve been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)() eUpon rson orecce receipt of r body notice of a earing d having the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the peal to appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: �C'j NAME MAILING ADDRESS 1 (4 sstiY ��� V-r V-T— ------------ PI//Z�1E�- Gyi''Ej 3 ;� Qow6-rt s l85 " Spe�<tl S4. F/;/, z..aaf nVr(57r i PROJECT OF INTEREST +4 & i 'j, S 0 77y �AV'Z�.' se(n'Tm�" sk�-10 < 5b .. W- S y s i1 c-d-2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: L CA'��O--I�— NAME I MAILING ADDRESS p a-!� coudi►,-! mc -P kio r �3 SO. MAoN ��— w,A nS�nG 2-1 Cr eonwzze l) hv-t, Lx 0&(sC V ECT OF INTEREST I f w f) f a '' .1 v L . Vim-) lee-, S4/\L,NA 12 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: (Z - L (— v 7 NAME MAILING ADDRESS zo 114Vu 6 l( AVe �DYK 4 S0 VT LQ PROJECT OF INTEREST ✓Ca rre6 �i// Q}�G N CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: ':::�)\\ NL� NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST UL� 4A C U K- CL cf s7 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 12, 2007 Gunnar McCain McCain Consulting 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: Final Plat Application #SD-07-53 Shalna Subdivision Dear Mr. McCain: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on November 20, 2007. Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 180 days (must be submitted & recorded by June 6, 2008) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7006 3450 0002 0949 2496 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 14, 2007 Gunner McCain McCain Consulting, Inc. 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: Shalna Property Dear Mr. McCain: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, C Betsy Donough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Algimantas Shalna Home IBuy a Home ISell a Home IFind an Agent IOpen Houses IConcierge Home Services `Rentals IRelocation Username Password Save your favorite listings, custom searches Create Account Forgot Password and receive new listings via email. Learn More $279,900 - 1450 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington Back to Search Results I Start a New Search Previous Photo Next Photo Contact Us Request more information about this property. Our exclusive Fast Response technology ensures a timely answer. Email this Lis in Send a link to this listing with a personal message to a friend via email. Calculate Mortgage Explore payment options for this property. View Similar Listings Search for other listings in the same town or price range. Print this Listing Print a brochure for this property. Add to Saved Properties Add this property to your My Page account. General Interior MLS Number 2710509 Features 220 Plug, Cable TV Available, Type Single Family Residential Ceiling Fan, High-spd Int Avail, List Price $279 900 Appliances Dishwasher, Dryer, Electric Oven/Rng, Refrigerator, Washer, Town South Burlington Vew ",?wn Information Fireplace Yes County Chittenden Flooring Carpet,Ceramic Tile, Hardwood,Vinyl, View CQuft Information Basement Full, Interior Stairs, Address 1450 Hinesburg Road Bedrooms 3 Exterior & Lot Half Baths 0 Siding Composition, Full/3Qtr Baths Total Baths Sqft Above Grade Sqft Below Grade Total Sqft Stories Year Built Listing Agency Living Room Kitchen Dining Room Master Bedroom Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 ~` 1 C=cres 0.50 i 1 ' —' e Color _.._ ._---Grey" 1866 finished sqft Style Ranch, 0 finished sqft Garage None 1866 finished sqft Foundation Concrete Block, 1 Roof Shingle, 1958 Land Description Mountain View, RE/MAX North Professionals, Colchester Utilities Rooms Heating & Cooling Baseboard, Hot Water, Natural Gas, Size Location Sewer Conv. Leach Field, Septic, 18x18 ft 1st Floor Water Drilled Well, 19x8 ft 1 st Floor Cable Company Comcast 14x12 ft 1st Floor Electric Company GMP 2423 ft 1 st Floor 8x12 ft 1st Floor Schools 13xl3 ft 1st Floor Elementary School So. Burlington Central School Middle School Frederick H. Tuttle Middle Sch High School So. Burlington High School This information is deemed accurate but not guaranteed. Source, © Vermont Real Estate Information Network, Inc. All rights reserved. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial use only. ffa Reel rZ Toll Free (800) 451-5004 Local (802) 863-1500 Home I About Hickok & Boardman I Contact Us I Careers I Site Mao I Commercial Properties 2007 Coidwell Banker Real Estate LLC. Coldwell Banker% is a registered trademark licensed to Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC. An Equal Opportunity 11 company. Equal Housing Opportunity, All Offices Are Independently Owned and Operated. Northern Vermont Real Estate I Vermont Home Buying I Home Buyers I Home Sellers I Property Search I Open houses ( Concierge Rentals I Relocation I Previews Luxury Homes i Home Page I Contact Us ; About Hickok and Boardman Realty I Site Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 4, 2007 Gunner McCain McCain Consulting, Inc. 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: Minutes - Shalna Subdivision Dear Mr. McCain: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved September 18, 2007 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, puW Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Page 1 of 1 ray From: algisshalna@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 2:26 PM To: ray Subject: Fwd: Dandurand TDRs Dear Ray Here is the letter from Paul Dandurand about DR for the property 1450 Hinesburg rd. Thanks Algis Shalna -----Original Message ----- From: Paul Dandurand <paul.dandurand@piematrix.com> To: algisshalna@aol.com Sent: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:34 pm Subject: Dandurand TDRs Algis, As per your request, this is to confirm that I, Paul Dandurand, owns 11 TDRs at 51 Van Sicklen Rd., South Burlington, VT. I am in the process of selling 2 TDRs, which will leave 8 more that I can sell (I need to keep one for my own house). Therefore, I have TDRs available to sell to you for your project. Please let me know if you need anything else and feel free to check with the City of South Burlington for their records that show I have TDR selling abilities in accordance to the City. Regards, Paul AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 8/21 /2007 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD drb\sub\shalna\shalna 2lot finaI.doc nda # 7 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: September 10, 2007 Plans received: August 24, 2007 1450 HINESBURG ROAD— 2-LOT SUBDIVISION Owner/Applicant Algimantas & Neringa Shalna 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Contact Person Gunner McCain McCain Consulting Inc 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Location Map FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-07-53 Meetinq date: September 18, 2007 Property Information Tax Parcel 0860-01450 SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 1.6 acres CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21ot final Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking final plat review to subdivide a 1.6 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) lots of 0.6 acres (lot #1) and 1.0 acres (lot #2), 1450 Hinesburg Road. The sketch plan was heard on May 1, 2007 (minutes attached). Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on August 24, 2007 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Neighborhood Residential Zoning District Requirement/Limitation Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 26,572 SF -7• Max. Density-NR 1.2 units/acre base density (max of 4/acre with TDR) 1.33 units/acre** 1 existing unit Max. Building Coverage 15% 8.2%** �l Max. Total Coverage 30% 13.6%** Min. Front Setback 50 ft. Approx 60 ft. # Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. 41 The acreage of the lot will not support one home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. No additional dwelling units shall be permitted on either lot without the transfer of at least one development right, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). ** Coverages are for Lot 1 which contains the existing home. # The front setback included is from Route 116/Hinesburg Road and pertains to the existing home on Lot 1. 1. No additional dwellina units shall be Permitted on either lot without the transfer of at least one development right, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The purchase of the development right documents must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to recording the mylar. There is currently an accessory structure (shed/greenhouse) located on the property. When the property is divided per the proposal, the shed will be located very close to the property line on Lot 1. An accessory structure must be located at least five feet from the rear and side property lines. It is unclear how close the shed is but must be five feet from the property line. 2. The accessory structure (shed) shall be located so as to be at least five feet from all property lines and shown on a revised site plan and survey plat. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING I -ON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 2lot final SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast Quadrant. 3. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Southeast Quadrant District This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district. Therefore it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR. 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning District. A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ- NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub- district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. A 1as rb ^f +kin Zin+i+kfnro +hie rri+orinn is not IVo e v bu:ld;.11J.s are proposed pal t vl a 110 apNliVuuvl ia VI .v.. a nv viwvv ... applicable to this application. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels At this time, there are only two lots proposed. Staff finds that the proposed subdivision meets this criterion to the extent necessary at this time. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable subdistrict allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 2lot final The proposed subdivision is in compliance with this criterion with the exception of the density limitations noted above. Additional units may be permitted on the subject lots with the appropriate transfers of development right(s). (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. At this time, no new development is proposed. Furthermore, there are no apparent wetlands on the site. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. At this time no construction is planned. Staff recognizes that this may change as the lots are developed and therefore this criterion would be better addressed at that time. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. At this time no construction is planned. This criterion is not applicable to this application. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. This criterion is not applicable to this application. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. At this time no construction is planned. However, the approval requested herein would for all purposes create a legal building lot and connections must be considered at this time. There is CITY OF SOUTH BURLINvTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 2lot final currently no connection from this property to the public water and sewer lines. The applicant has submitted a letter which states their belief that the City will extend water and sewer infrastructure from Dubois Drive to Highland Terrace. However, at this time, there are no formal plans in place to accomplish this. The Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department substantiates this belief (see attached). Staff does not support approving the creation of a new lot which cannot substantiate adequate, reasonable provision for water supply and sewage proposal. 4. The plan shall be revised to show the provisions for water supply and sewage disposal. (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. Hinesburg Road is included among several corridors on the Official City Map for a proposed recreation path. Several properties along the road have already dedicated easements to the City. It is possible that this property is among those needed to complete the path along the corridor. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has reviewed the plans. They have verbally stated a request for a recreation path easement along Hinesburg Road. They have stated that they will have a representative available at the hearing to discuss this matter with the Board. 5. The plans shall be revised to show a recreation path easement along Hinesburg Road at the direction of the Development Review Board. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. Staff has already stated that the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee should comment and the Board shall render a decision on this matter. (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. At this time no construction is planned and this criterion is not applicable. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. At this time no construction is planned and this criterion is not applicable. Should a new home be developed on Lot 2, it should be accessed from Highland Terrace and addressed as such. The Administrative Officer shall asses this should any residential units be proposed for Lot 2. 6. Any dwelling units proposed for Lot 2 shall be accessed from Highland Terrace CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shaIna 2lot final (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. No new roads are planned as part of this application. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. No new roads are planned as part of this application. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. No new roads are planned as part of this application. 9.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections.. (2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 400 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and 9-9 below. (2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21ot final promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. (4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4). (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5). (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets). (2) Building Fagades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. (3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings should be set back fifteen feet (15') from the back of sidewalk. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. (6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing types. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 2lot final At this time no construction is planned. Staff recognizes that this may change as the lots are developed. The Board previously discussed this issue and decided not to enforce design review as part of this application. Cep The plans should be revised to remove the notes and lines referring to "original property line." The two (2) original lots have merged thereby eliminating the original property line. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the applicant addressing the issue of adequate, feasible water supply and sewage disposal for the proposed new lot. The Board should continue this application until the applicant can fully demonstrate that this has been completed. If it cannot, staff recommends denial of this application. Respectfully submitted, Or< Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, applicants McCain Consulting, Inc. Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting August 23, 2007 Ray Belair South Burlington Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Application for Subdivision Final Plan Review Shalna Property, 1450 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Ray, Enclosed please find the following information in support of the above referenced project: 1. A complete Final Subdivision Plat Review application 2. A fee check in the amount of $261.00 (two hundred sixty-one dollars) 3. A list of adjoining landowners 4. An email stating that Paul Dandurand has 8 TDRs that he is willing to sell. 5. Five (5) 24" x 36" copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy of the revised preliminary site plan (Sheet 1 of 1, dated 8/20/07) 6. Six (6) copies of an 8 %2" x 11" concept sketch showing water and sewer connections to Parcel 2 Concerning the concept plan for the water and sewer connections for Parcel 2, the sketch was prepared for, and has been sent to, Julie Beth Hines so that she cold begin the process of extending the water and sewer infrastructure up Highland Terrace to serve this and other properties. It is my understanding that it will take several months to start this process, and as Mr. Shalna has no immediate plans to develop Parcel 2, the timing is not an issue relative to that. It is understood that the City is reluctant to approve lots that are not permitted for water and septic, so the concept plan is provided to show that there is a possible solution for that issue. In the event that the City never approves the municipal extensions, then the plan would be to run service lines for Parcel 2 down Highland Terrace to the existing water and sewer lines on Dubois Drive. In addition, the Site Plan notes that Parcel 2 is subject to "deferral" restrictions, so that it is evident that Parcel 2 cannot be developed until the water and sewer permits are obtained. That language will also be included on the final survey mylar for the project, and presumably the DRB would condition their permit similarly so that it is very clear that Parcel 2 is not developable until those permits are in place. Y:\Projects\26's\26103\TownFinal.doc _ 93 South Main Street ® Waterbury, Vermont 05676 ® (802) 244-5093 Tel. ® (802) 244-7492 Fax Ray Belair August 23, 2007 p.2 Please note that Parcel 1 has been reduced in size and Parcel 2 has been increased in size. Please contact us when the date for Final Plan Review has been determined. Thank you and please feel free to call with any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, McCain Consulting, Inc. Gunner McCain Enc. Cc: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, w/ enclosures Y:\Projmts\26's\26103\Tow Final.doc Cathyann LaRose From: Jay Nadeau Qayn@cwd-h2o.org] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 2:25 PM To: Cathyann LaRose; ray Cc: George Dow; Bruce Hoar Subject: FW: 1450 Hinesburg Rd I just spoke with Mr. McCain. He stated that actually the water supply issue is not that big of a deal. His biggest issue is that he can not design an onsite leach field due to soil conditions. He can however drill a well as long as he can get the appropriate isolation distances around the well. He said that he will contact George about a sewer line, and may even have to design a force main with a grinder pump. We also discussed the fact that if he does connect to the City sewer system but is on a well we will need to know that for water/sewer billing purposes. Should not be a problem in keeping us posted. Given our conversation, I do not see a need to provide anything else to him in writing. Please advise if you feel otherwise. Jay -----Original Message ----- From: Jay Nadeau [mailto:jayn@cwd-h2o.org] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 9:59 AM To: Ray Belair; Cathyann L. LaRose Subject: 1450 Hinesburg Rd I have left a voice mail with Mr. McCain concerning the 1450 Hinesburg Rd project; his letter of Aug 23, 2007 and voice mail to me left yesterday afternoon. In my message I explained that the City has no intention of extending the water line to that area of the City before year 2024, and even after that it would be unlikely. I further explained that there is a hydraulic issue in this area, in that the area is above the highest elevation contour that the current distribution system can provide and still meet the State Water Supply Rule minimum requirements of 35 psi at the ground floor level. I asked that he give me a call to further discuss this project. After we speak I will put something in writing as a follow-up. I'll keep you posted. Jay 1 I Homer & Marie Uubois 1 0860-01a0s I I I 1 I I 1 Joseph & Lisa Malley I 0860-01425 I I I 1 I NOTES Septic Took and Building Sewer: 1) Contractor to verify o 1000 gallon concrete septic lank relro-fit with an access riser to grade, and an effluent filler. Pretreatment: 1) Contact designer when replacement is needed. Face Man: 1) Perform a hydrostatic leakage lest of the farce moor at 50 psi and hold pressure for two hours. Leo.hlield - Performance Based Approach Design Notes (Replacement) 1) Assume a three bedroorn house. Daily Flow (OF) O 140 gpd/br a 420 gpd 2) Maximum applicalion role for fllrote n a mound • 2.0 gal/sf/day 3) Required trench area: OF/AR - 420 gild / 2.0 g/ef/day . 210 sf 4) Actual area: we trench 0 4' z 100' - 400 sl Leadsfeld - Construction Notes 1) Contact designer when replacement is needed. Inspections and Cerldiicolions: 1) Contacl designer when replacement is needed. Details 1) Contact designer when replacement is needed. 1 I � I I Sall nformatun Test pits ezcavuled an 7/12/07 Bill Zabeoski, ANR, Esser Junclon Present to Observe SB-I 0" -13" Brown topsoil loam Few ford mottles 0 10" 13%36" Gay brown loamy sill Common distinct molUes Seepage 0 29" SB-2 0' -10" Brown lopsod loam 10'-36' Gay Mown loamy sill Common faint mottles 0 10' Seepage O 30" — / _ (6) 11" RED PINE ROW - i _ Douglas & Elaine Mares 200t - _ 0850-00009 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. 7'opography ay Total Station Contour lntemal 2' Assuaged Datum N 44-25'-50.0"; W U73'-0}'-2L1' N 44'-25'-49.e W 07Y-UI'-19.8' N 44'-25-50.3' W 073-03'-19.5' I _ IRF 1 I I I .11 Polska0004 I 08:A- I I I I m I 1 I 1 I 1 I SB-3 0' -6" Brown topsoil loom This design is for a septic system to replace a failing system at the site. This is a beat fie" solution and as such it may or Common faint mottles 0 6" may not be in conformance with current septic system design regulations. Ifis the opinion of the designer that this design 6' -3" Gay brown loamy silt complies with the intent of septic regulations which is to prevent the creation of health hazards which include, but we not T� SI 1 E PLAN SITE Common distinct mottles limited to; surfacing sewage; contaminated drinking water, groundwater and surface water; to insure adequate drainage related SB-, to the proper function of sewage disposal areas and to insure that itionses we designed, constructed, operated, and n that hedlhtal conditions. 4 ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA Mollies O 6' maintained a manner wall promote sanitary and O�1 5B_5 Mollies O 6' �. R.. TWO LOT SUBDNISION SB-6 ROUTE 116 & HIGHLAND TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT Mottles O 6' SB-7 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE ^ r �o SCALE : I" = 20' McCAIN CONSULTING, INC. 0-7" Brown topsail loam REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA SEC. 1403 FOR THE FILING 111 DESIGNED BY: GNM PROJECT : #28103 7" 40" Mottles 0 7' Of SURVEY PLATS. �yOS DRAWN BY: SJH/RHP 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET CHECKED BY: GNM WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 SITE TECHNICIAN: DATE: AUGUST 20, 2007 SHEET 1 OF 1 GUNNER NCCAIN Y: - Cadd 26000'a 26lO3' d\se 261U3 8-20-07.dw B-237 Homer & Marie Dubois 0860-01405 I I Joseph & Lisa Malley I 0860-01425 0 m N Judith Lovanway o` I 0860-01440 v Y I I Existing Drilled Well S 86'48'23" E N 0391W E I S 86'48'23" E 27.75' 2.30' 172.13' _-�- x�-5 8T4323" E _ ° 15" Apple ,--------I o 250.71Y_ ,.,�,�, _ ) I Parcel 1 1 1 I_ r �� �` I�� I .Existing I I ts RE I 'e E I >r Driveway 18" Apple i is 1w S �' I 'r 24" Ma le I {" 3 _ Parcel 2 I cI u� ® P 1 1 o I,- 9S _ I N Hedge Row 3 z Existing i ^ z 15 ° a? ° ° S Drilled 0, Existing i I i� i � � a I S ° ° �Io I Well u House SO Maple 1 - 1 I Mal a5 24' AI 1 liNuallt, I �' It�vl g o sh �c , I in"+1 Ilyl'' I,nIhGclol (---- I� I"I 15 Maple 30" Maple I•x (6) 12" Red Pine Row _ w 1771.1' a a N 86_57'23" W N 8f> 48'23" W — _ I 246.95' 27.15 I Douglas & Elaine Muynes 0850-00009 (; RA1'H1C SCALE I ( IN 111NICI' ) I inch - 40 ft.. Existing Parcel I 30,920t sq.fl. Proposed Parcel 1 = 26,630t sq.fL Existing Parcel 2 = 39,480t sq.fl Proposed Parcel 2 = 43,770t sq.ft TITLE SOURCE: South Burlington Land Records Warranty deed of Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller to Algirrantas Sholno and Neringo Sholna, Book 754, Page 310-311, Dated 30 June, 2006. I I i-John & Patricia Trutor 0850-00040 NOTES: 1) This map is based on the research of the South Burlington Land Records, physical evidence found and a total station traverse with a minimum precision ratio that meets the standards for suburban surveys, set by the Vermont State Board of Land Surveyors Rules effective October 11, 1999, performed by Keith R. Van Iderstine and Scott A. Hazle in March, 2007. i 2) There is included with existing Parcel 1 a right to water as described in o warranty deed of Rolond E. Peterson, doing business as Peterson Construction Company, to Helen Puffer as well as rights to water as described in a water rights agreement from Merril and Hilda Gave to Helen B. Puffer, Dated October 31, 1957 and recorded in Book 34, Page 38 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. 3) Except where otherwise noted, no attempt was made to identify and/or locate any easements or rights -of -way that may exist, either recorded or unrecorded. The Hinesburg Rood (Vermont Route 116) right-of-way is assumed to be 3 rods wide and centered on the traveled way. 4) Beorings are based on Magnetic North, August, 2007. 5) Research by Keith R. Von Iderstine. Map by Scott J. Herring LEGEND Q 1'z" Iron rod to be set with cap 0 marked "VAN IDERSTINE 719" Iron pipe found p 19 Calculated point Utility Pole SURVEY AND SUBDIVISION OF THE LANDS OF — _ _ _ Property line Right -of -Way line ALGIMANTAS & NERINGA SHALNA c' - x Wooden fence x — Barbed wire fence line 1 Vermont Route 116 & Highland Terrace South Burlington, Vermont 0 - Overhead utility wires 36/792 Tree line Book 36 Page 792 of the Land Records �y SCALE 1" = 40' McCAIN CONSULTING, INC. 4 PROJECT : Mc26103 93 SOUTH MAIN STREET DRAWING: 26103sv.DWG WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676 Keith R. Van Iderstine, LS. 719 t ( DATE: August 24, 2007( SHEET 1 OF 1 Cathyann La Rose From: Lou Bresee [lakelou@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 5:05 PM To: Cathyann LaRose Subject: DRB Item #SD-07-53, 1450 Hinesburg Rd Hello CathyAnn The sub division proposed by the subject DRB item raises the possibility of obtaining a 20 ft. easement along Hinesburg Rd. for a future separated multi -use path. This request is totally consistent with our recent plan which states that multi -use paths should be planned along all major roads in the City. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee recommends that this request be made. Lou Bresee Chairman South Burlington Recreation Path Committee 9/17/2007 ning Commission, the Regional Plan- ning Commission, adjoining property owners, other interested persons granted parry status pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c). Non-party partici- pants may also be allowed under 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(5). Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this 20 day of August 2007. By Peter E. Keibet Natural Resources Board District 4 Coordinator III West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/ 802-879-5658 E/ peterkeibel@state.vt.us ACT 250 NOTICE MINOR APPLICATION 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 On August 17, 2007, the Town of Williston, filed application 4CO971R- 2A for a project generally described as: the construction of a 60.5' lattice tower and attachment of 6 whip antennas for municipal services. The project is Located on Route 2 in the Town of Williston, Vermont. The District 4 Environmental Com- mission will review this application under Act 250 Rule 51 - Minor Ap- plications. Copies of the application and proposed permit are available for review at the Williston Municipal Office, Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission located at 30 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, and the office listed below. The application and proposed permit may also be viewed on the Natural Resources Board's web site (www. nrb.state.vt.us/lup) by clicking on "District Commission Cases," select- ing "Entire Database," and entering the case number above. No hearing will be held unless, on or before September 11, 2007, a party notifies the District Commission of an issue or issues requiring the pre- sentation of evidence at a hearing or the commission sets the matter for hearing on its own motion. Any hearing request shall be in writing to the address below, shall state the criteria or subcriteda at issue, why a hearing is required and what additional evidence will be presented at the hearing. Any hearing request by an adjoining property owner or other interested person must include a petition for party status. Prior to submitting a request for a hearing, please contact the district coordina- tor at the telephone number listed below for more information. Prior to convening a hearing, the District Commission must determine that substantive issues requiring a hear- ing have been raised. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless the Commission holds a public hearing. Should a hearing be held on this project and you have a disability for which you are going to need accommodation, please notify us by September 11, 2007. Parties entitled to participate are the Municipality, the Municipal Plan- ning Commission, the Regional Plan- — ­v rn,. I ne UIUS WILL Be PUBLICLY opened on thr `date at the time of the bid cic Je Contractor shall provide au necessary labor, equipment and materials to the Whispering Pines Stormwater System in accordance with the plans and specifications. The work shall consist of removal of trees, excavation for a new stormwa- ter treatment pond, installation of all pipes and structures, stabilization and installation of fence. The above description of work is made available as an aide to the bidders. All bidders shall make their own interpretation of the work necessary to complete the project. The described work may commence on September 24, 2007, but no later than October 1, 2007 with all on site work to be completed on or before October 31, 2007. The source of funding for this project is the State of.Vermont Orphan Stormwater SystemGrant Program. The notice of award for this project will not be issued until the funds are transferred from the State of Vermont to the Town of Colchester. This transfer is currently pending. Therefore the dates listed are subject to delay pending receipt of funds by the Town of Colchester. Contract documents may be viewed at the Champlain Consulting En- gineers, 85 Prim Road, Colchester, Vermont,802-863-8060. Contract documents may be obtained at the office of Champlain Consulting Engineers, 85 Prim Road, Colchester, Vermont from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Each bid must be accompanied by security in an amount of not less than 5% of the bid in the form and subject to the conditions set forth in the Information for Bidders. No bidder may withdraw his/her/their bid within thirty (30) days after the opening thereof. The attention of Bidders is directed to the requirements as to the condi- tions of employment to be observed and the minimum wage rates to be paid under this Contract. The Bidder to whom the contract is awarded will be required to furnish Performance, Payment and Guarantee Bonds from an acceptable Surety Company for an amount not less than 100% of the accepted Bid. The Owner reserves the right to ac- cept or reject any or all offers. CHARLOTTE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Pursuant to Title 24 and the Charlotte Land Use Regulations, the Board of Adjustment will hold public hearings on Monday September 17, 2007 with the first hearing begin- ning at 7:30 p.m. These hearings are at the town halt 159 Ferry Road. -Appeal by Michael and Martha Wool of the Zoning Administrator's deci- sion that a permit is not needed for work performed on a Hills Point Road access to Lake Champlain. The ac- cess is for the Mark Binkhorst 1148 Lake Road parcel. Property is located in the Shoreland District. uuvemie & Domestic Relations District Court Commonwealth of Virginia, in re Cody Hartle. The object of this suit is to obtain custody of Cody Hartle and appear before Williamsburg James City County Juvenile & Domestic Reta tions Court on October 24, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. It is ORDERED that the defendant, Brian M. Hartle appear at the above - named Court and protect his or her interests on or before October 24, 2007. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hear- ing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Preliminary plat application SD-07-48 and Final plat applica- tion #SD-07-49 of 518 Corporation for a planned unit development to amend a previously approved plan for a 24,749 sq. ft. retail & office building. The,amendment consists of converting 2222 sq. ft. of retail use to a drive -through facility, 514 Farrell Street. 2. Preliminary plat application SD- 07-51 of Technology Park Partners to subdivide 177.2 acres into 16 Lots ranging in size from 3.98 acres to 29.46 acres, 30 Community Drive. 3. Final plat application SD-07-53 of Algimantas Shalna to subdivide a 1.61 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) lots of 0.61 acres and 1.0 acres, 1450 Hinesburg Rd. 4. Final plat application SD-07-54 of William E. Dailey, Jr. to amend a previously approved five (5) lot sub- division. The amendment consists of altering the water main connection, 1500 Dorset Street. John Dinktage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. STATF OF VFp MnrJT CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. DOCKET NO. 91-06 Cnc Eastern Savings Bank, FSB, Plaintiff Bruce E. Willette, Jr. and Melissa A. Willette, The Vermont State Dept. of Taxes, ALI Seasons Excavating and Land- scaping and S.T. Griswold and Company, Inc., and LTS Homes, Inc., d/b/a Latham Homes, Inc., Defendants. NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and in execution of the Power of Sale contained in a certain Mortgage Deed given by Defendants, Bruce E. Willette, Jr. and Melissa Lertarn premises in the Town of Col- r rin the County of Chittenden, tate of Vermont, described as foLlows, VIZ: Premises commonly known as 127 (fka 117) Williams Road, Colchester, Vermont. Being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to Bruce E. Willette, Jr., and Melissa Willette, by Warranty Deed of Charles M. Scribner and Gloria Scribner dated May 30,1996 and recorded on May 31, 1996, in Book 260, at Page 549, in the Land Records of the Town of Colchester. Reference is hereby made to the above mentioned instruments and the records and references made therein to further aid of this descrip- tion. The derivation of the same being: The same being property conveyed by deed executed by Bruce E. Wil- lette, Jr., and Melissa A. Willette, husband and wife, on 12-21-2004, as recorded on 12-27-2004 at Book/ Liber 512, and Page/Folio 77, in the Land Records of Chittenden County. Parcel Identification Number: 17- 066003. Terms of Sale: Purchaser at the sale shall pay cash or certified funds, or produce a commitment letter from a bank or mortgage company or other lender licensed to do business in the State of Vermont at the time of the sale for the amount of the winning bid. In any case the winning bidder shall be required to produce $10,000.00 (ten -thousand dollars) cash or certi- fied funds at the close of auction as the deposit against the sale. The sale will be subject to the Confirma- tion Order of the Chittenden Superior Court. In the event the auction terms are confirmed by the Superior Court aforesaid, and the winning bidder is unwilling or unable con- summate the sale, the deposit shall be forfeit. In the event the sale in not confirmed the deposit will be returned without interest. The Mortgagors are entitled to redeem the premises at any time Prior to the sale by paying the full amount due under the mortgage, including the costs and expenses of the sale. Other terms to be announced at the sale or inquire at Grant C. Rees, At- torney, PO Box 108, Milton, Vermont 05468,802-893-7400. By: Grant C. Rees, Esq. Mortgagee or Mortgagee's Attorney STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. DOCKET NO,S714-06 CnC JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA as Trustee for the C-Bass Mortgage Loan Asset -Backed Certificates, Series 2005-Rp2, Without Recourse, Plaintiff V. James T. Cournoyer, Patricia A. Cournoyer And Occupants residing at 259 North Street, Winooski, Vermont, Defendants NOTICE Of SALE By virtue and in execution of the Power of Sale contained in a Cournoyer and Patricia q: r-_" Cot Byer by Warranty Deed of Ch2 Crowley and Pauline E. CrowU August 7, 1998 and recorded ume 106, Page 5 of the Land of the City of Winooski. Terms of Sale: $10,000.00 tc paid in cash by purchaser at time of sale, with the balancf closing. Proof of financing fc balance of the purchase to be vided at the time of sale. Thi is subject to taxes due and of the Town of Winooski. Other terms to be announced sale or inquire at Lobe & Fort Kimball Ave., Ste. 306, South ington, VT 05403, 802 660-91 JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA as By: Joshua Lobe, Esq. Lobe & Fortin, PLC 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306 South Burlington, VT 05403 TO ALL INTERESTED AGENCIE GROUPS AND PERSONS: The purpose of this Notice is i identify two separate but reLa. actions to be taken by the Toy Essex. On or about 9/24/2007 the at named municipality will reque that the Vermont Agency of Cc merce and Community Develol (hereinafter Agency) release ft under Title I of the Housing at Community Development Act c (PL93-383) to be used for the lowing project: Project Title: Essex Senior Hou Purpose/Nature of Project: Construction of a building that will provide 48 affordable apar ments with services for seniors Location of Project: 22 Carmicl Street, Essex, VT 05452 Estimated Cost of Project: $8,400,000 (Vermont Communi Development Program funds wi provide $490,000) Project Summary: Cathedral Square Corporation, e 501(c)(3) non-profit organizati will construct 48 units of affon housing in the "Town Center" o Town of Essex. Essex Senior Hoi will serve households over 62 y of age, including seniors who a frail and at risk of Medicaid del dency. Essex Senior Housing w a universal, barrier -free buildin CSC is designing Essex Senior H ing to anticipate that an increa level of meal preparation, healt personal care services will be m over time among the residents. intends to create a supportive t ing community with resident se coordination, a commercial kitc and dining area, support with transportation, lifeline services assistance accessing Medicaid 1 waiver services. Finding of No Significant Impac An environmental review for the project has been made by the Tc of Essex and is available for pub examination and copying at the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 August 29. 2007 John & Patricia Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, C Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 August 29. 2007 Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Bets Donough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Permit Number SD- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Cnj�n610 S55 -- gy1S 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #)5y 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) , Sr,(v, - Q- 4) CONTACT PERSON (Person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address phone& fax #) ., Z`l`i scs;3 NA - +192- Contact email address: mccn,-n m � l e�b vT �� 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS \ySy l n�5 h arc,. 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) =90 - o ges0 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) x� b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) = �iSG d) Height of building & number of floors S if basement and mezzanine) �d buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify a.0 N� x,yYr�ke e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) 1,AA g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) SE0 - K)V— lk-A ic-i- List any changes to the subdivision, -such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: -40 ,\ $, to 5e, _ CeV. � (acres /sq. ft.) b) Building Coverage: Existing 219(v square feet 9.2. % Proposed 01A square feet 0 A % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing ZW_(o square feet 13 • Co % Proposed IJIP5- square feet 0A d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed square feet % 11 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: Qlh sq. ft. *Projects disturbing more than on -half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking Q\Ar 12) COST ESTIMATES K) �A -no r�u,�, 6_,Ac)"T r1r2 Pn 051Qc_) a) Building (including interior renovations) $ b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC Caps �ex 51ny s� ) a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION O \A 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 3 t0 3 3 o\N 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS — please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. ll w-� ecJ 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERT OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: /complete ❑ Incomplete go7 0 4h4toll(of Planning &Zoning or Designee ate 4 Algimantas & Neringa Shalna Parcel 0860-01450 Adjoining Landowners Parcel Adloiner 0850-00009 Douglas W. & Elaine Maynes 9 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0850-00040 John W. & Patricia A. Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01405 Homer L. & Marie J. Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01425 Joseph & Lisa K. Malley 1425 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01440 Judith M. Lavanway 1440 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Y:AProjects\26's\26103VAdjoioers.doc Read Message Page I of I Read Message Previous Next Move To j Select One From: algisshalna@aol.com <algisshalna@aol.com> add to contacts ] To: mhammerl@mccainconsulting.com Cc: Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 09:06 am Subject: Fwd: Dandurand TDRs Please give this to Gunner. Thank you Algis Shalna -----Original Message ----- From: Paul Dandurand <paul.dandurand@piematrix.com> To: algisshalna@aol.com Sent: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:34 pm Subject: Dandurand TDRs Algis, As per your request, this is to confirm that I, Paul Dandurand, owns 11 TDRs at 51 Van Sicklen Rd., South Burlington, VT. I am in the process of selling 2 TDRs, which will leave 8 more that I can sell (I need to keep one for my own house). Therefore, I have TDRs available to sell to you for your project. Please let me know if you need anything else and feel free to check with the City of South Burlington for their records that show I have TDR selling abilities in accordance to the City. Regards, Paul AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. L) Text version of this message. (912B) Previous J Next LLo �� IN Al Q'aSQG�Q �C4 'Tcva r ; cY--ALX r-v b'-)& -A �� a SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 MAY 2007 and office building. The amendment consists of converting 2,222 sq. ft. of the retail store to a drive -through facility, 514 Farrell Street: Mr. Belair said there is virtually no change to the lot. They are just creating a drive - through for retail use. Mr. Carroll said the market is evolving. They originally anticipated more commercial development around their building. The building has a warehouse out back and also has a frame shop, offices, etc., on the second floor. With the development of all the housing around them, they feel they need a new business model. Sales are down, and one amenity people want is the ability to drive up and drop off or pick up something. Mr. Dinklage raised the issue of stacking up traffic. Mr. Carroll felt that only one or 2 cars might arrive at the same time. Mr. Dinklage said this makes him mildly nervous. He suggested crafting a one-year review process by the DRB, and if there are problems, the DRB would have the chance to deal with them. Mr. Carroll said all the space around their store is used exclusively by the store. You can drive completely around the building without going onto Farrell St. (6. Sketch Plan Application #SD-07-27 of Alginantas Shalna to subdivide a 1.6 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into two lots of 0.7 acres (lot #1) and 0.9 acres (lot #2), 1450 Hinesburg Rd: Mr. Nowlan said the applicant intends to have one addition TDR. Staff noted they will have to review the application with the Rec Path Committee regarding an easement on Hinesburg Rd. Mr. Belair said in the new SEQ Zoning Amendments, the Planning Commission created a list of design criteria. The Board has the choice of whether to apply these. In the past, with smaller developments, the Board has chosen not to apply these criteria. Ms. LaRose added that they can apply some and not others, if they choose. Mr. Dinklage said his only concern would be if something the applicant plans to build doesn't fit in with what is existing. Mr. Belair said they can build only 1 house on the lot. In addition, the existing accessory structure would have to be moved. Mr. Nowlan said they are willing to do that. Mr. Belair reminded the applicant that if they are not going to be on public water/sewer, staff will have to have all the details for the systems that will be used. 7. Site Plan Application #SP-07-23 of John Eustis to amend a previously approved plan for a 3865 sq. ft. retail building. The amendment consists of converting the building to commercial kennel, veterinary hospital and pet day care use, 1333 Shelburne Road: -3- SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 June 21, 2007 Gunner McCain McCain Consulting, Inc. 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: Minutes - Shalna Property 1450 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. McCain: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved May 1, 2007 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ��ft d In't BetsyUo9nough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: April 23, 2007 drb\sub\shalna\shalna_2lots ubdoc Plans received: April 13, 2007 1450 HINESBURG ROAD- 2-LOT SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-07-27 A enda # 7 Meetin date: May 1, 2007 Owner/Applicant Algimantas & Neringa Shalna rk 7951 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495- Contact Person Property Information Gunner McCain Tax Parcel 0860-01450 McCain Consulting Inc SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 93 South Main Street 1.6 acres Waterbury, VT 05676 Location Ma CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21otsub se Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, hereinafter referred to as the applicants, are seeking sketch plan review to subdivide a 1.6 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) lots of 0.7 acres (lot #1) and 0.9 acres (lot #2), 1450 Hinesburg Road. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on April 13, 2007 and have the following comments. Zoninq District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Neighborhood Residential Zoning District Requirement/Limitation Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 30,492 SF �• Max. Density-NR 1.2 units/acre base density max of 4/acre with TDR 1.33 units/acre** 1 existing unit Max. Buildin Covera e 15% 5.9%** Max. Total Covera e 30% 10.9%** Min. Front Setback 50 ft. Approx 60 ft. # Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. + The acreage of the lot will not support one home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. No additional dwelling units shall be permitted on either lot without the transfer of at least one development right, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). ** Coverages are for Lot 1 which contains the existing home. # The front setback included is from Route 116/Hinesburg Road and pertains to the existing home on Lot 1. 1. No additional dwelling units shall be permitted on either lot without the transfer of at least one development right, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. There is currently an accessory structure (shed) located on the property. When the property is divided per the proposal, the shed will be located on Lot 2. An accessory structure may not be located on a lot without a principal structure. The shed should either be removed from the property or moved to the proposed Lot 1, located in accordance with section 3.10 of the SBLDRs. This includes locating it no closer than five (5) feet from all side and rear lot lines. 2. The accessory structure (shed) shall be removed from the property or otherwise relocated to Lot 1 in accordance with all provisions of Section 3.10 of the SBLDRs. The plans shall be revised to reflect this change as part of the final plat application. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21otsub seca SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast Quadrant. 3. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Southeast Quadrant District This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district Therefore it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning District. A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ- NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub- district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. No new buildings are proposed as part of this application; therefore this criterion is not applicable to this application. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels At this time, there are only two lots proposed. Staff finds that the proposed subdivision meets this criterion to the extent necessary at this time. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable subdistrict allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 2lotsub seg The proposed subdivision is in compliance with this criterion with the exception of the density limitations noted above. Additional units may be permitted on the subject lots with the appropriate transfers of development right(s). (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. At this time, no new development is proposed. Furthermore, there are no apparent wetlands on the site. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. At this time no construction is planned. Staff recognizes that this may change as the lots are developed and therefore this criterion would be better addressed at that time. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. At this time no construction is planned. This criterion is not applicable to this application. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. This criterion is not applicable to this application. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 2lotsub sea At this time no construction is planned. However, the final plat plan shall show the provisions for water supply and sewage disposal. 4. The plan shall be revised to show the provisions for water supply and sewage disposal as part of the final plat application. (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. Hinesburg Road is included among several corridors on the Official City Map for a proposed recreation path. Several properties along the road have already dedicated easements to the City. It is possible that this property is among those needed to complete the path along the corridor. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee should comment further on this matter. 5. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee should review the plans and provide comments prior to final plat approval. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. Staff has already stated that the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee should comment on this matter prior to final plat approval. (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. At this time no construction is planned and this criterion is not applicable. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. At this time no construction is planned and this criterion is not applicable. Should a new home be developed on Lot 2, it should be accessed from Highland Terrace and addressed as such. The Administrative Officer shall asses this should any residential units be proposed for Lot 2. 6. Any dwelling units proposed for Lot 2 shall be accessed from Highland Terrace. (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. No new roads are planned as part of this application CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21otsub seq (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. No new roads are planned as part of this application. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. No new roads are planned as part of this application. 9.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections.. (2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 400 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and 9-9 below. (2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 21otsub seg (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. (4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4). (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5). (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets). (2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. (3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings should be set back fifteen feet (15') from the back of sidewalk. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. (6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing types. At this time no construction is planned. Staff recognizes that this may change as the lots are developed and therefore the Board should discuss this issue and decide if the applicant shall be bound to the design criteria included above. If the Board would like to assess the design criteria, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING drb\sub\shalna\shalna 2lotsub sea they shall do so prior to final plat approval or provide a condition that no units may be built on the lot without design approval from the Development Review Board. 7. The Board should discuss this project with respect to the Southeast Quadrant design standards. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document before proceeding to preliminary plat application. Respectfully submitted, 44athnNnL4aose, Associate Planner Copy to: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, applicants CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMON'P 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 24, 2007 Gunner McCain McCain Consulting, Inc. 93 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Re: 1450 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. McCain: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on May 1, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, —66� Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 1 i CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Number SD- - APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed_ mailing nddrPcc nhnnP and fax ih 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 4�5� /5)0-311 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) sanko 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) C, 1 0� 0, I inc q Contact email address QmeCbr;n� mCca;nCchSy�ii.(rrYl4 2�,f_spg3 P 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 2yL{ - 4492. icFSU �in o�,�n)m �m_n 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0 6uu - O\q50 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) PY:'k-,'. "',ten _ 1 d7-4 ._ ('1 r \ - 1 - , i A 1 d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) AAA e) Number of residential units (if applicable`, new units and existing units to remain) eY-zS�ii�G SiY�G` Q YGM{�J tnom o �. I . I . — <1. f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) SLQ - k)v- -v)ACn-r-'-- 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing kL_ 5 .q— % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existingi-to.ft % Proposed___aj! ► % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing _% Proposed % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) wee c����I�oc� f )��rr..,L '11n,,„ m 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.)_()- 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 0 2 I 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11 " x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OAP LICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPER OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: CG d I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: I ? Complete ❑ Inc ete &- L Planning & Zoning or Designee EXHIBIT A SKETCH PLAN The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (1 I" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. If submitting a plat amendment, please submit only pertinent information. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses, p/Name and address of owner of record and applicant. q/ Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. ®/ Location map showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. q/ Boundaries and area of all contiguous land belonging to the owner of record. p/Boundaries and area of the proposed subdivision. p�/Existing and proposed layout of property lines. )_- Type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land (easements, covenants, etc.). 9/location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets or private ways. -;�— Existing zoning boundaries. -�- Existing watercourses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. -er- Number and location of parking spaces (see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations). ;/ Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard. -a A list of waivers desired (if any). �- All applicable information required for a site plan application shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development (please see site plan application). APPLICATION FEE ❑ Sketch Plan Application $125.00 4 McCain Consulting, Inc. Septic Design, Land Planning, Surveying Act 250, State & Local Permitting April 12, 2007 Julie Beth Hines Director of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Application for Subdivision Sketch Plan Review Shalna Property, 1450 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington McCain Project No. 26103 Dear Julie Beth, Enclosed please find the following information in support of the above referenced project: 1. A complete Sketch Plan Review application 2. A fee check in the amount of $125.00 (one hundred twenty-five dollars) 3. A list of adjoining landowners 4. A copy of the Warranty Deed to the property 5. Six (6) 11" x 17" copies of the preliminary site plan (Sheet 1 of 1, dated 4/10/07) The project is located in the SEQ-NR District and involves the subdivision of parcel 0860-01450 into two lots. Parcel 1 will contain the existing single-family residence; Parcel 2 has no proposed development at this time. Please contact me when the date for Sketch Plan Review has been determined. Thank you and please feel free to call with any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, McCain Consulti ,Inc. e_'ile Fitch Project Administrator Enc. Cc: Algimantas & Neringa Shalna, w/ enclosures Y:tProjects\26's\261031TownSketch. doc RECEIVED APR 13 7037 City of So. Burlington 93 South Main Street • Waterbury, Vermont 05676 0 (802) 244-5093 Tel. ® (802) 244-7492 Fax 1 WARRANTY DEED INO W ALL PERSONS BYTHESE PRESENTS that We, Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller, of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantors, in consideration of TEN OR MORE Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by Algimantas Shala and Neringa Shala, of Williston in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantees, by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantees, Algimantas Shala and Neringa Shala, husband and wife, tenants by the entirety, and their heirs and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in the City of South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being all and the same land and premises conveyed to Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller by Warranty Deed of Daniel E. Wright dated September 15, 2000 and of record in Volume 485 on Pages 276-278 of the City of South Burlington Land Records and being further described as follows: v 'Being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to Daniel E. Wright and Beatrice L. Wright (now deceased) by Warranty Deed of Gerald Vaiilancourt and Wilima J. Vaillancourt dated October 1, 1975, and recorded in Volume 126, Page 66 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Lands and premises with residence thereon consisting of two separate parcels of land described as pua follows: C Q Parcel i : A lot of land with residence thereon, the dwelling house being known and designated as No. 1450 Hinesburg Road; situated on the easterly side of Hinesburg Road, said lot being more particularly described as Lot #1 as shown on a Plan entitled "Tract Plan -- Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont -- property of Christian B. Hoskam, Jr., and Hazel G. Hoskam", dated June 17, 1957, and of record in Volume 11, Maps, Page 307 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, Said lot has a frontage on Hinesburg Road, its westerly line of 154.6875 feet, a northerly and southerly line of 200 feet each, and an easterly line of 154.6875 feet. Being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to the within Grantors by the Warranty Deed of Helen B. Puffer, dated May 28, 1969, recorded at Volume 91, Pages 89-91 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. This conveyance is made subject to certain protective covenants, including a utility easement -over the rear 10 feet of the tot herein conveyed, dated June 19, 1957, recorded at Volume 34, Page 324 of the City of South Burlington Land Records_ This conveyance includes the right to water as set forth in the Warranty Deed of Roland E. Peterson doing business under the firm name and style of Peterson Construction Co, to Helen Puffer and also all rights to water, and duties associated there with as set forth in a Water Rights Agreement from Merrill E. Gove to Hilda Y. Gove to Helen B. Puffer, dated October 31, 1957, and of record in Volume 34, Page 38 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. J OFFICES OF ORD, OVERTON Parcel 2 : A lot of land lying easterly of the aforementioned Parcel #1, said lot having a westerly line vnsoN. Pc of 156.89 feet, a northerly line of 250.72 feet an easterly line of 160.58, and a southerly line of LAIN STREET 246.85 feet, said lot being designated as Extension to Lot # 1 as shown on a Plan entitled 'Plan of NCnON. VERMONT 5452-31" LAW OFFICES OF OLVOORD. OVERTON & WIL.SON, PC 3 MAIN STREET SEX JUNCTION. VERMONT OS452-3199 Land Belonb.ag to C.B. Hoskam, South Burlington, Vermont; _ Is R. Ogden Land Surveyor, Charlotte, Vermont, dated July 26, 1969', recorded at Volume 180, Pages 115-116 of die City of j South Burlington. j Being all and the same lot of land conveyed to the within Grantors by the Warranty Deed of Christian B. Hoskam and Hazel C. Hoskam dated August 21, 1969, recorded at Volume 91, Pages 334-6 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. To said deed, plan of land, the records thereof and to all deeds and records therein referred to, reference is hereby made in aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all theprivileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Algimantas Shala and Neringa Shala, husband and wife, tenants by the entirety, and their heirs and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; and We, the said Jack Hyde and Paula D. Miller, Grantors, for ourselves and our heirs and assigns, do covenant with the said Grantees, Algimantas Shala and Neringa Shala, and their heirs and assigns, that until the enseaiing of these presents we are the sole owners of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; except as aforesaid, and We do hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, We hereunto set our hands and seals this 3 b day of June A.D. 2006. IN THE PRESE O I Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. Jack Hyde Paula D. Miller At L0 1 this 30 day of June A.D. 2006, Jack Hyde d Paula D. Miller personally appeared, and they acknowledged this instrument, em d subscribed, to be their free act and deed. Vermont Property Tranr_fDe%me, �! ��++� #32 V..1S��.A.tt��Chap 23��11� t,11-(� Notary Public i?cii.RN R? C ,)JAX PA.0 UOMD OF HEALTH WIT. RECD. V r L`+IdD UsE � DE1rELiDPt.4Ek1T PLANS ACT. CERT. 4EC O cadcedlHd��acf {jfrlcmf } (Ci "itC 1 Gterk Date My commission expires: 2/10/07 �� s Algimantas & Neringa Shalna Parcel 0860-01450 Adjoining Landowners Parcel Adjoiner 0850-00009 Douglas W. & Elaine Maynes 9 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0850-00040 John W. & Patricia A. Trutor 40 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01405 Homer L. & Marie J. Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01425 Joseph & Lisa K. Malley 1425 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0860-01440 Judith M. Lavanway 1440 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Y:\Proj ects Q6's\Z 6103\Adj oiners.doc