Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0111 0113 Hinesburg Road
Cathyann LaRose From: Paul Boisvert [paulb@engineeringventures.com] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 3:14 PM To: Cathyann LaRose Cc: Tom Chastenay ; Wanda Clark; David Boehm; Paul Conner Subject: Chastenay project, 113 Hinesburg Road Cathyann, Thank you for your call earlier today, checking on the status of the Chastenay project. I spoke with Tom Chastenay a few minutes ago, and on behalf of the family I am requesting that the sketch plan application be withdrawn. The family is not ready to pursue the project at this time, and would like to avoid any further inconvenience for the City staff and the Design Review Board. Our thanks to Ray Belair, Paul Conner, and you for assistance with this project. Paul Boisvert, P.E. Engineer, LEED AP email: paulb@engineeringventures.com "71ENGINEERING VENTURES Pc STRUCTURAL & SITE ENGINEERING 208 Flynn Ave., Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 tel:802.863.6225 • fax:802.863.6306 CREATIVE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS www.engineeringventures.com 9/3/2009 r DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 JULY 2009 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 21 July 2009, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; M. Behr, E. Knudsen, G. Quimby, R. Farley, M. Birmingham Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; J. Padgett, J. Cooper, D. Young, M. Young, S. McIntyre, M. Pelletier, R. Provost, P. Gordon, A. Irish, D. Polius, M. Malley, F. Parker, K. Unsworth, L. Wisloski, C. Souture, G. Provost, T. McKenzie, C. Thabault 1. Other Business & Announcements: Mr. Belair reminded members there will be no meeting on 4 August so members can participate in the National Night Out festivities honoring the city's volunteers. 2. Minutes of 7 July 2009: The Minutes of 7 July were not available. 3. Continued sketch plan application #SD-09-10 of Stella Chastenay Trust for a planned unit development to construct a 4-story building consisting of 7,800 sq. ft. of retail use and 24 residential dwelling units, 111-113 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked for a continuance until September. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-10 until 15 September 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Continued Site Plan Review Application #SP-09-49 of Jeff Cooper to convert a single family dwelling to 1132 sq. ft. of general office use and 500 sq. ft. of retail use, 50 Hickory Lane: Mr. Padgett said they had reorganized the parking to include 3 spaces along the property line. He showed the egress route and the location of a dumpster, bike rack and snow storage area. Two commercial on -site spaces will be on Sherry Road, and staff will be asked to park there not in front. Mr. Dinklage noted that 3 trees between the property line and the stone wall are on city property, and the city will have the right to remove them if the need arises. Mr. Padgett said there will be no digging; all work will be on the surface. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must -be an opportunity for each person -wishing to achieve interested person status to. demonstrate -.compliance witf-i-the- applicable criteria 24 V.S.-A. § 4461(b)-. The- DRB must keep a_written record-of-the•na-me; address-and-participationrof each person who has sought erson status 24 V.S.A.. 4461 b . A co of an decision - rendered P § O pY Y rendered by.the DRB must -be mailed to .avert' -person or body appearing and having been heard by.the DRB. 24.V.S.-A: §-4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice -of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the - appellant in -five working- days. 2-4 V.-S.A. §" 4471(c). HEA 1NG DATE: J-4 NAML " ' . MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST (2,0 61 ✓� �L �}���r CC4% % S - � y Y �y dq y� Sa , a � qo WL\d Essex 1:3- 05g52_ C,3, c"-VY-. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be -an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate -co m- pliance with the -applicable criteria-. 24 VS . --A. §4461(b). The DRB..must keep a<writtenreoord of the -name -address-=and pa-rticipation of -each -person who has sou ht° interested erson status. 24 V.S.A: 4461 b -A-co - of decision g- P § (� PY Y rendered by the DRB must;be mailed to eve ryPerson or body appearing and --having g. been heard by the. DRB: 24-V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental- court, the DRB must-supplya list of interested persons to the _ - appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). // HEARING DATE: ��,, 1 L q\ I � q NAME MAILING -ADDRESS PROJECT O INTEREST l� 1 P ,r. WIN, Wil.-W PLANNINGsouth MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner_. , RE: Agenda #3, Stella Chastenay Trust DATE: July 17, 2009 Continued sketch plan application #SD-09-10 of Stella Chastenay Trust for a planned unit development to construct a 4-story building consisting of 7,800 sq. ft of retail use and 24 residential dwelling units, 111-113 Hinesburg Road. Staff has been in contact with the engineer for the applicant who has advised staff that they are still working on changes recommended by Staff and the Development Review Board at the last hearing on the subject lot. Staff recommends that the Board continue the application until September 15, 2009. As always, thank you for your continued patience. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com found that at the 25 mph speed limit, there would be a sight distance of 420 feet, which falls within the standards. Mr. Cutler said he is now asked for that northern curb cut to be reinstated. Mr. Cutler noted there is also a "one way in" from Shamrock Road. He has mowed a piece of land to allow for exit to Ethan Allen Drive. He noted the current access is very steep, and it is more conducive to traffic flow to use the northern curb cut. Mr. Belair said he had received no comments back from Police, Fire or Public Works Departments. Mr. Cutler added that the civil engineer has said there is still a safe stopping distance from the northern access. Members considered whether to visit the site. Mr. Behr said he felt the applicant had done what the DRB requested.. He felt speed in the area could be addressed by enforcement. Mr. Knudsen said not being an engineer, he is in no position to disagree with what a civil engineer has said. Mr. Cutler said he would agree to leave the Ethan Allen Dr. access on the plan and will brush -hog it regularly. Mr. Belair reminded the Board that this application has to be reviewed every 2 months, so it can be revisited if there is a problem. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-09-40 of Timothy Cutler subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 12. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-10 of Stella Chastenay Trust for a planned unit development to construct a 4-story building consisting of 7,800 sq. ft. of retail use and 24 residential dwelling units, 111-113 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked for a continuance until 21 July. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-10 of Stella Chastenay Trust until 21 July 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Clerk (/o.�/�9 Dates From: Paul Boisvert [mailto:paulb@engineeringventures.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 3:37 PM To: ray Cc: Tom Chastenay ; David Boehm Subject: Chastenay project --- DRB Ray, I just spoke with Tom Chastenay. We would like to request that the DRB sketch plan review be continued to May Wi, rather than reviewed on April 2 1 " as currently scheduled. Thank you. Paul Boisvert, P.E. LEED AP Engineer email: paulb(a�en ineeringventures.com STRUCTURAL & SITE :ENGINEERING 208 Flynn Ave., Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 tel:802.863.6225 • fax:802.863.6306 CREATIVE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS www.en )meerin,�,)ventw-es.com From: Paul Boisvert [mailto:paulb@engineeringventures.com] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 1:20 PM To: ray Cc: Tom Chastenay; David Boehm Subject: Chastenay project Ray, Thanks for the call earlier, about the Chastenay project. We're still in a holding pattern on our end. On behalf of the Chastenay's I'd like to formally request that our DRB hearing be continued to the July 21 S` meeting. Paul Boisvert, P.E. LEED AP Engineer email: paulb@engineeringventures.com STRUCTURAL & SITE ENGINEERING 208 Flynn Ave., Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 tel:802.863.6225 • fax:802.863.6306 CREATIVE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS wXV .cnneeringventilres.com t: �I 1w',,,,, =, 4tN If WAR i.w �� �� i Itikklllkkifkl1f I tikkf( _ `:._ •.ter .rw_ trrr NNOR am OR an m .0 111111 Hill ■■I ■■ � �, •�. �. i � .._, a.re �— ---+1�AT tprrr , ,rsri� aer= u_ai ' ��Rrowl W! , m rws rrwei �ilf •.� win nIuir` > u m wu«rl— :. mall i C�....�"•i�.r.""'...'.`n�tc-. ter' ,.�- ,�ar��+P�' �:7 �tv"-'3' L•r�.y.. ' 'a�rTrwL� ..�.--.� :�� �r lip, via NOWANI swft 9EFUM .�_ ..-_,.-... _ ..... — Srr� 11 t .�._... i........r..� alr" lair'; �;= ura Zij Nadi ■.j Iasi .is �_ ) ._ { oil t�►..r.��c{.� ,��' `.[II' [[!tl ., i� f - t [t��•...�.. ;tom ■�.�.:'. f. ��I-�..�.. �I�.�ii �{ { {= r �) tll � � '� llf, l[. I :� III o l �11i ,111lf�,-- ��. Ill;—'- �w_a: �► ..ter .....•�'��-- -'-�`' - -Nadi 'Now Nis _ KNIFE NEI all -_ ---�� _IIiIlllll� i �IC'. lll tllll (lll lllff' _ -- �! --- -- i -�- - I��' �c ■aaaare �: T, fr ��..��+=-."*��..w .....�. ws NOW 11116lilt,:� � ..iw.��!r.+��er_.r .-. 7Mlf l�' i�� oar.= imamIowa ^—� 1 ter,• .a �� ■�',.— _. .ems awrlii ��� ��� �.-,�...LVEWW�' ��., IN, goal, ��-- .cal ara�i�T_ .. �� ��� ....v.rr. �R� O .� .`_' am uof',. = lame lElri,� ate,..—. �� am ..,.... �la�i.�r+.+c _ _ .�. _ m - - - - raq I we, I T' mil—cm...041 I I - �WW "ISQ Lg 1-1]", 1 Ill Mill EAST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0" �r�a rrlrrr�rl lrr�rrrl�lr�l�llrr lr�ll�ll �11���rirrrr-��wrrAur .,yri��iaraaa� +a�a ���r ■rael�-�..,..°e., rw� rra,a.arr w.. � ' �_ . .—fro s �� ,---�-�-�— � .ri...Y�.u,. ;. � vlw� � f�lrlll!•�ii INVA pw a I wh,, . � ��■III i1llll�l�l,llli t One 9jQdredAQ6ee 0&w& MIchaeIDllgan.A.I.A. T . . 8 rF..mn iris Ei �aaR R I91S7 na•In•on I ua•nrau • I�+a•aa�+1�� ( fl laal 7,rar I/� � 91. Allan, fi Ifa91 ua•snaar. WEST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0" ichaelDuganA.IA. T. W N pl.."... prl.. 111•ITIJ111 SL 141- /I117-771 1171 UI.1 q 1. DEMOLITION NOTES 1. NO DEMOLITION SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL THE SITE IS PROPERLY PREPARED FOR CONSTRUCTION AS OUTLINED N THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT COBROL RAN AND NARRATNE 2. ALL DOOM ITEMS FROM THE DEMOLITION, UNLESS NOTED BY THE OWNER TO BE STORED OR REUSED, BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE COORACION AHD SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE SOIL DISPOSAL SNAIL BE AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. 1 ALL ADUALENF FICRDES AND SFRUCRKS NO INDICATED AS INCLUDED N THE SCOPE OF WORN SIWL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE DAM CONISIRICTONM. ALL ADJACENT FAOUIES OR STRICTURES DAVAGD DURMG CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IMMEDL41ELY TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITION OR BETTER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SAFE WORK AREA DURING DEMOIITDN 5. PRNN TO DEMOUIION, HAND EXCAVATE ANY UNDERGROUND URTIES. NOTIFY THE OWNER F ANY OTHER UNITIES NOT NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE FOUND. 8. CARE SHALL BE TAIEN NOT TO WAGE OR DISTURB ANY TREES AND SITE LIGHTING NOT CALLED OUT FOR REMOVAL DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8. ALL DOSING MATES, FENONG AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN WITH CROSS HATCHING (- ij TO BE ROOM (MH, CB, RIPE ETC). 9. ALL CDNSMU:TDN DEBRIS SAIL BE PROIPRY REMOVED FROM THE SITE NO DISPOSED OF OR RUMED N AN APPROVED MANNER AT A NYSDEC PERIM SITE 10. SEED AND MULCH ALL RESULTING DISTURBED AREAS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PUN, WHERE NO WORK IS ANTICIPATED WITHIN 48 HOURS. 11. THE FOLLOWING TEAR SOUL BE DEMOLISHED AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE, UNLESS OTHERMSE NOTED. OASROLT PAVEMENT SIDEWALK AND CONCR7E PADS. SOW EDGES. OSTORM DRAIN UNES, SWONTY SEWER PIPING AD/OR STRICTURES OTREFS AND/OR LANDSCAPING. OBUILDINGS. STRICTURES, AND FOUNDATIONS nPOWER POLE 3 MIREAD EIECERIC LINE Market St. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ) 1i..h = 20 ft 1 I ` I I I t I ` 1 1 t i 1 I 1 1 _I Garden I ! IN Gal a?ye f ''20.7 T House M I 1 { FFEa'23.3 1 1 1 I 1 Mpg, I 1 1 t 7.840 SF F.�TPRINT 23.80 DRAWING LIST PLAN VEIN SEERS: j C1.0 DISTNG CONORIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN C1.1 SITE LAYOUT PLAN C1.2 UTILITY AND GRADING PLAN C1.3 EROSION PRPENIRON AND SIMIIEN CONTRA PLAN PROFILE VEW SIEE1S. C20 STORM SEWED PROFILE Stamp DETAIL 9NEEIS: C3.0 WATER DETAILS AND NOTES C3.1 SAWTARY SEWER DEMNLS AMID NOTES C32 STOWVWTER DE01S AND NOTES C33 EROSION PREVENTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS AND NOTES C3.4 SIRE DETAILS AMID NOTES SURVEY NOTES 1, TORPUNMEIRC AND BOUNDARY INFORRATDN RAIN FROM SURVEY BY VfTMONT (EOMAICS, DATED OCFOBE2008. 2. UTILITIES SHOWN DO NOT PURIM TO CONSTITUTE OR REPRESENT ALL UTIIIES LOCATED UPON OR I = ADJACENT TO THE SUINM PREMISS. EXISTING UTILITY LOCOIORS ARE APPROXIMATE OLY. DE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL UTILITY CONFLICTS. MY D6pEPAMCES SHALL BE REPORRED TO THE ARCHITECT. OWNER, AND ENWIFDt. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT DIG SAFE (888-344-7233) A MI. OF 48 BUSPESS HOURS PRWR TO THE START OF MY CONSTRUCTION, b GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED N WITTING OF ANY CONDITIONS THAT VARY FROM TIDE SHOWN ON THE RAMS THE CONTRACTORS WON SOUL NOT VARY FROM THE PLANS "OUT EXPRESS APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS INSTRUCTED TO COOPERATE WITH ANY AND ALL OTHER CONDUCTORS PERFORMWIG WORE( ON THIS JOB SITE DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS CONTRACT. d 3. THE CONTRACTOR 91ALL RESTORE LAWNS, DRIVEWAYS, CULVERTS, SIGNS AND OTHER PUBLIC OR PRNATE i PROPERTY DAMAGED OR REMOVED TO EXISTING CONDOM OR BETTER AS DETERMINED BY THE 04MM ANY DAMAGED ITEMS, SHRUBS AND/OR HEDGES SIIALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SOUL COMPLY WITH NFPA 30 AND ALL REWIRED STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS. - I 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALE COMPLY WITH NATIONAL EIECTRC COO: (NEC) REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPLOSION PROTECTION AND GROUNDING ING WIRES cp i gg S H 8. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING, AMID INCURRING THE COST OF ALL REQUIRED PERMS. INSPECTIONS AND CERTIFICATES. Z - W IS 5 '; W 7. THE CONDUCTOR WILL PROTECT EXISTING PROPERTY TAIL 40M1MENTAKN. ANY MONUMENATON DISTURBED OR DESTROYED, AS JUDGED BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE ? CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE UNDER THE S PETMSIOF OF A VER ONT STATE UCENSD LAD SURVEYOR. .M ." 3. R & IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESFDNSSIUIY TO uAmE ALL RAN SHEETS AND SPECIFIcAmN& AND COGROWTE WORK WITH ALL CONTRACTS FOR THE SIZE Z W Lu > _ R n 3 v 5 § T 9 y $ 9. D IS THE COMFRALTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO CONDUCT EXPLORATORY TEST PITS AS MAY SE REQUIRED s TO DETERMINE UNDERGROUND CONDITIONS Ig 10. ALL TRENCH EXCAVATION AND MY REQUIRED SHEETING AND SHORING SHALL BE DONE N ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST 09M AID NY-OSW REGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTACTOR BULL BE RESPONISBIE FOR PROVIDING APPROPRIATE AND REQUIRED OSHA TRAINING TO PERSONNEL WOROIG ON THE SITE 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEWATERING AND THE MAINTENANCE OF SURFACE DRAINAGE U DURING THE COURSE OF WOW c 12. CONTRACTOR SIMLL MINION FLOW FOR ALL EXISTING UDUIES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE w z <oa 13. ALL SIZE FILL SHALL MEET SELECTED FILL STAIARDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. 14. THE CONTRACTOR 91ALL GRADE ALL AXES ON THE SITE TO PROVIDE POSIRNE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM T�/I BUILDINGS AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. C.X oP. 15. THE CORRALTOR SHALL BE RES%mu FOR PROIDING ALL FIELD LAYOUT. THE CONRACTOR SHALL z i PROVIDE MARKED -UP AS -BOLT PLANS FOR ALL UTILITIES 9MOMNG CONNECTIONS. BENDS, VALVES, LENGTHS z O x MI. OF LINES AND INVERTS AS -BUILT PLANS 9WL BE RENEWED BY THE OWNER AND HIS RFPRSEWIATNES BEFORE UIIUTFS WILL BE ACCEPTED. rn O x IP I 18. COORACTOR SIWL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPER INSTALLATION, MONITORING, MAINTENANCE AND `m -2-U 1. REMOVAL OF ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, TAKING PRECAUTIONARY STEPS TO AVOID ANY h SEDIMENT TRANSFER TO NEIGHBORING SUESWATERS OR WATOF THE STATE U v RE E VED z JAIL 2 7 2009 I City � So. urlington LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED MANHOLE CLEAN OID O C/0 CATCH DASN ■ ❑ • BOLLARD • STORM MANHOLE TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE 12A GV lD4 DG GATE VALVE HYdUNT WATER SHUT OFF Yi LIGHT POE O UTILITY POWER POE v. SOIL BDRING HANDICAP SYMBOL V- SPOT FLLVATION +100.5 TREE SEWER o IX.1 STORM SEWER SIRILCIURE 1 O DE9ONTION Q W FOR DRB REVIEW ONLY Z a O NOT FORS CONSTRUCTION O Z O 04 �Q WC7� EDSRIG o z Q �t UO �ws F Z s FENCE STONE WMLL 0000D000co W x t PROPERTY LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE -- CONTOUR IW SETBACK - - - - - w SANITARY SEWER UNE 55 - STORM LINE ST WATER UNE W UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UE Designed By: PB OVERHM ELECTRIC 0H Checked By: PIS UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UT Drawn By: KB Scale: 1'=20' CAS LINE C Date: NOV 7. 2008 EDGE OF PAVEMENT C1.0 PROJECT j07202 N I I� I IIpf 1 1 1 1 8 r \ C t I 1 ,I T/, ,/.,_ 12" Mapk `W'32 I 12"t4., I I \ le 95 - 81 1 / 7Ouse FFE_323. 6 / R 1 / Aboveground Oil Tank Gars9e � � T' 29• I \ \ I�.M�e f,�jr_`+^'+��-jJ, (\ � / 2q• � \ /� 4 \\ � \ ` \ 29" Ala I \ \ / I 1 I l�t'in \/je 9" & A$ 4©9"yn, \\ 1 \\\ 15" 6'I I WMPSIER PAD \ \ I \\ W BU INK 1\ ENVPE IJMRCONCRETE 8yle \ 36" a J WITH FENCE " I I d.0 320 \ I ................ ----- ----}- --_—_ ---- �'r2--- --- © I BIORETENTION ''\� \ ' 2Y i I AREA / m 71 © 7 M 3",9 / / / 1 C I� i■■��■■■■■■■Ili•°■■�N■■■■■■■■■�iCfll■!�I �. ' 7.8,10 SF I I \ FOOTPRINT F.F 323.80 / 1 +323.8D 5' WIDE � 30 TAPER 'Pi1, p`' �• l CONC RETI / SIDFU—i I M r St. � _rj_ — -_ - T - wall ` N I'm _ _ _ _ _ _ 59357/]0/9I �� Oe --Lo / ® —NEW / ACCE / ® RAMP / / ZONING REQUIREMENTS 1, ZONING: CENTRAL DISTRICT 3 (CD-3), PER THE OFFN'AL ZONING MAR EFFECTIVE FEB. 25. 200E 2. PROPOSED PROJECT. RE -DEVELOPMENT OF DOM RESIDEIM LOT WITH MEN MIMED -USE I BUILDING 3. PARCEL INFORMATION: (PER LAND DEVELOPMENT REQULATIONS, LAST AMENDED FE9. 25. 2ODB) A LOT AREA = 1.28 ACRES B. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS STANDARD REWIRED PROS@ FRONT YARD SEIBACN 0 FF 0 FT REAR YARD SETBACK 0 FT N/A SIDE YARD SETBACK 5 FT MIN. 82 Fi MAX. BUILDING COVERAGE 40% 17% MAX. LOT COVERAGE 90% 70% W/OTp MAX. BUILDING HOGIR 45 FT INCD-3 W/ BONUS 45.8 FP I MAX. OENSOY D., FAR. W/BONUS 0.64 FAR. - MAX RESIDENML DENSITY 25 UNITS/ACRE 24 UNITS C. PARKING REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENT: 74 (TOTAL. SHARED) PROPOSED: 74 (69 SIE. 5 STREM I D. LWOSCAPING REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENT: 1011 MIMMUN INTERIOR LANDSCAPED ISLANDS PROPOSED: 13x (BIOREIENOON AREA) REQUIREMENT.1 MAIOR DECIDUOUS/ 5 SPACES . 15 PROPOSED: 14 PLUS 1 EXISTING DECIDUOUS g 6 CONFERS RECEIVED JAN 27 2103 City of So. Burlington FOR DR13 REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/20/09 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 Tt Stamp H g ppj M'•'� `g�^g2 C7 W ae,�P. u 3 s W U m n > 20 �p nmm i U � z 0 o zxm x N Designed By: PB Checked By: PB Drawn By: KB Scole: 1 "=20' Date: NOV 7, 20013 C I . I PROJT /07202 ........................... UTILITY NOTES `-..��.. `` ..0 AND CROSSINGS L \ / \ \ � -- � 1. REFER TO FROFlIES ON SHEET 120 FOR DESIGN OF SIGN SEWER LINES INCLUDING INVERTS SLOPES <I r Y I stamp \ f SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION I 51 CORE DETAIL T NSHEET PVC CONNECTION INTO OWING SEWER MANHOLE. FFE=323.6 — J 52 NEW 6' SOR 35 SEWER LINE AT 2% MIN SLOPE TOWARDS STREET \ tt FFE-315.5Q. WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION / I ` (�AP mm &umR MAN WIAZ WEN &SWrDEPN8WQ0 z \ l \ NEW 4 0.1. WATER SERVICE TO BUILDING � ING I a \\ \\ QPE UNIT _ I CONCRETE \ \ \ Q OUMPSTER PAD I \ \ \\ kD 2 WITH FENCE X x \\ SE1 }P4 ,,° I° °u STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION W' Sy .j,°"o^; :°.:.:o o°>°° °.:o. e.o. O Fx I # N 1 ' • •°.°. • .° \ ST1 15' HOPE .40 DRAIN OUTLET YBIH FLARED END SECTION I NV. - 314.40 1 ( . PERVIOUS ° / / \ \ ' \ � 0. 0 I ` I \\ O 3' DN CONCRETE CATCH BASIN \ PAVEMENT ,/ / / / \ RIM - 318.00 40 , / / I ,/ I \� 6' INV. IN (SE) - 315.00 U ., 12' HOPE DINE (NW) INJ. - 314.90 v ' I 22.20 O06PEM PAD 12' PVCOUTLET W/ FLARED END SECTON, INM. - 318.5 W Z <o P L I i ISO r I J/ ^\ F cal sj / - _ _. __ __ .... .�.......- ................ y .........., ... ..... _. .... .. - ..._.. ..\./ 4' OR OUNCREiE (ATM BASIN T� . ... ... _. PB �_ ' / / / SIDEWAIIE AVNI SE4 RY . 320.80 Tr3 a i A / ( REPLACE M1TFI ER IY NV. DUE (W) - 317.24 u W I 4' W CONCRETE CATCH BASIN s rc BIORETENTION '' r \ 12' INV. IN (E) - 317IS E C E '� m AREA PB / Rl / ,/ / L, 1\ 12' Iw. DUE (MIN - W/ Fl/a��N SECTION O/m /' Jl3 I / I\ 51 MJ. 3HOPE STg81 DRND ' V E D 9 ITV 15.50 319 ''ee 'wryA y --_- - - - - - - � Y' �I I \\ F7,840 SFOOTPR SF PRINT /'// w I \\ 4W'7� � � 2009 I� z \\ // // - y ` P.3 / ,J F.F 323.80 _I �,)` — City of So. Burlington / � �; a o LANDSCAPE PLANTING INFORMATION 0.6 7 .10 — 1 ,Ly +323. V (°UERCUS PALUSTRIS) F+-1 UfHUlEAF LINDEN (ULV CORDATA) W \ � F P3 m BRANFORD PEAR (PYRUS CalERYANA) s / / 1 e NEW ST4 / / // ACCESSIBLE O EASTERN HEMLOCK (15UGA CANADENSIS) \ 5' WIDE j 70 TAPER \ CONCRETE I i I I / O RED MAPLE (ACER RUBRUM) \ SIDEWALKS_- - a r St . V \ GINKGO BROBA (GINKGO BIL084) _ I / / MiNIFRBERRY (ILEX VFRRCRUTA) N OARROWWOOD (VIBURNUM DENTATUM) h I Designed By: PB 3 p8 JAPANESE BOXWOOD (BUXUS MICROPHWU) Checked By: PB Dmwn By: KB/AR Scale: 1'=20' �— — - — --- — — — ------ Dote: NOV 7. 2008 FOR DRB REVIEW ONLY I Joao GRAPHIC SCALE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/20/09 IN FEET1 inch =2a fG F1.2 CT #07202 11 _-------- _ `\ N \ I i I / \ ( FFE=31S.s \\ I \ ; Garage -'' - MR CONCRUE PAD IMF 1 -- EPSC NOTES I. TOTAL AREA OF SOIL DISTURBANCE = 68,400 SF (1.57 ACRES) Stamp g2 REFER TO Cl- FOR ALL DEALS AND ADDITIONAL N0NOTESREGARDING EROSION PREVENTION AND .6 \\ // 1SWUM CONTROLS N \\ \ 01 IT I I \1 \\ I - ; House EPSC LEGEND 9H 14.81 I \ I LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE CONSTRUCTION FENCE SF SILT FENCE ,. CHECK DAM 1 , \ CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE i & rr Ie EROSION LLLLLLL �I``rC E I V E ILLS I 1\ TREE PROTECTION W w B (CONSTRUCTON EDUCE) W S l z / y �y�ly ioq I�If)gtOft W > 12 City of S0. �U / SOR STOCKPILE/STAGING AREA c „ r / — �yeg I 9 OET � ■E - �¢jNpiyE p • SF • '>T� ■ 1 FOOTPRINT r ■{� 009-im 1 >�71f�t1� z THIS STRUCTURAL MEASURE IS A STABILIZED PAD OF AGGREGATE UNDERLAIN WITH FILTER FABRIC LOCATED AT ANY POINT WHERE TRAFFIC WILL BE ENIEANG OR LEAVING A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO OR FROM A PUBLIC z CC33 RIGHT-OF-WAY, STREET, AIM, SIDEWALK OR PARKING AREA THE PURPOSE OF A STABIUZED CONSTRUCDON ENTRANCE IS TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE THE TRACM OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROBS-CF-WAY OR SQETS THIS WILL HUMAN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE PROJECT SITE HAS BEEN PERIWJDOI.Y STABILIZED. ONCE REMOVED, THE IMPACTED AREA SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED. SEE DETAIL ON C1.04 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THIS SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL TF/1 TECHNIQUE W U N o ^ SILT FENCING,THE + w ci r LADEN RU� FRSMALL URE I DRAIN AGE R EA &F IER DISSNORBm SOIL ITIS5� ED ALONG TO THE PERIMTERCEPT ETER OF IMPACTED AREAS AND ALONG THE BASF OF THE FILL SLOPES. ADDIRDNINlY, WHEN DESIGNATED ALONG H o� THE UNITS OF DISTURBANCE. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION FENCE BEHIND THE SILT FENCE. SILT FENCING IS VJ Z EFFECTIVE IN REDUCING STORMWATER RUNOFF VELOCITIES, ASSIST IN THE DEPOSITION OF TRANSPORTED 4� U SEDIMENT LOAD AND PREVENT EROSION OF SOILS ONTO ADJACENT AREAS. THESE WILL REMAIN INPLACE AND BE MAINTAINED UNIT THE PROJECT SIZE HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. SEE DEAL ON C3.04 U FOR COESTRUCION AND MAINTENANCE OF THIS SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL TECHNIQUE. CGNSTRIICTION(( OR CHAIN LINK(%1 FENCING. THIS STRUCTURAL MEASURE IS INSTALLED ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT AREA IN MANY CASES THE UMT OF DISTURBANCE WILL COINCIDE WITH THE FENCNG OR INDICATE BUFFER PEAS TO BE PROTECTED. THE FENtlNG IS EFFECTIVE YNEN USED TO SEPARATE THE PROJECT AREA FROM ADJACENT AREAS USED BY THE PUBLIC. THESE WILL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE PROJECT SITE HAS BEEN PEIWLAFE.NTLY PABIUZED. CONFIRM LOCATION, D ETS AND GATES WITH OWNER. FENCE W LOCATION AND GATES TO BE FE-ABNSIED AS NECESSARY BASED ON DARIWUTH COLLEGE AND CM O �I REDUIREUERrs AND COORCINAII N. APPROXIMATE SQL STOCKPILE PIEIS. L O O C) THESE ARE APPROVED LOCATIONS WHERE TOPSOIL AND OTHER SOIL MATERIALS MAY BE STORED. THESE f-R STOCKPILES WILL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION BY A NUMBER OF METHODS, INCLUDING INSTALJNG SILT FENCING AROUND THE DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER OF THE STOCKPILE AND SEEDING AND MULCHING THE ��r�TT777 STOCKPILE WHEN NOT INUSE FOR MORE THAN FIVE DAYS. THESE ARE PROVED AND LOCATIONS ALTERS O rT, F+, -N 5 THEE NOT APPROVED LIN THESE WHERE NON -SDI, NON -ERODIBLE MATERu15 MAY BE PORED. SOILS h^+1 F+al SHALL NOT BE PORED IN THESE AREAS. LIMITS OF DISTUIIINRE CE iOFOIT ^� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAINANY EARTH MOVING ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE DESIGNATED UNITS SHOWN ON P., F_I THIS PLAN. TIE ENGINEER SHNL REVIEW THE SITE TO MAKE ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO ACCOUNT FOR Q 1 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSATE AREAS, SPECIMEN TREE AND SPECIAL AREAS OF CONCERN. z z z 'a EFMIDN CONTROL MATTING O A THIS STRUCTURAL MEASURE IS INSTALLED N AREAS THAT HAVE SHAPES GREATER THAN 3:1 AND OTHER LOCATIONS INDICATED ON THIS PUN TO STABILIZE THE SLOPE AND REDUCE THE EROSION POTEOW. MATTING IS TO BE INSTALLED AND STAPLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND W VA U �--� MAINTAINED MOIL VEGETATION IS FULL ESTABLISH _ N S FOR ORB REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Designed By: PB 1 /20/09 Checked By: PB Drown By: KB Scale: 1'-20' Date: NOV 7, 2008 GRAPHIC SCALE NPcx, C 1.3 I inch = 20 rr_ PROJECT /07202 TRENCH SURFACE WIDTH SHALL BE KEPT AS am WATER SYSTEM NOTES TRACER WARNING TAPE NARROW AS PRACTGL LENGTH OF OPEN ALL PIPE SHOULD RAVE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 5-6" FROM WATER MANS PAVED UNPAVED TRENCH SHALL BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM. TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE. REFER TO APPLICABLE DETAIL FOR IONA, SEED, AND MULCH. OVERFILL FOR '�. /� - /�.. 1. PERFORM A HYDROSTATIC AND LEAKAGE TEST ACCORDING TO AWWA CGOO LATEST REVISION ON EACH PPE EU. PAVEMENT D PAVEMENT SUBBASE SETTLEMENT 2. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE (%VEAL AT LEASE 72 HOURS NOTICE BEFORE THETESTIS CONDUCTED. TEST MUST BE WITNESSED BY THE PAVED UNPAVED ADJUSTABLE CAST RON ENGINEER. 3. SPECIFIED TEST PRESSURE IS 200 PSI. AND PRESSURE DURING TEST SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 5 PSI. VALVE BOX WITH UD MARKED 'WATER* � BIGIOILL OF SUITABLE NATIVE MATERIAL COMPACTED IN 8" MAX. UFTS TO 95% i MUN DENSITY UNDISTURBED SOIL DROP STriE CO4IIR 'WATER* EKSBIR; UTETFS 1. LOCATION OF UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN AS APPROXIMATE ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMEIOS 2. ALL MUOES SHALL BE LOCATED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 3. EOSITNG UTILITIES SHALL BE PROTECTED AND SUPPORTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. Stamp ' Y STANDAD OPI COMPACTED IN 12' UFIS TO 90S � CUSS "B" CONCRETE I A. ALL WATER, GAS, CABLE, TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC, SEWER, AND OTHER UTILITIES FOUND TO IWMFERE'WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RELOCATED IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER, STANDARD OPTIMUM DENSITY INSULATION COVER INSTI L WITH I NSU. TNIOOIESS PP: OEM SAND BLANKET. MEET REQUIREMENTS SA BLANDRK SPECIFICATION, DO 0-3.6' LOWER PPE SAME AS ER 1. SAND BEDDING MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF FNRHW'ORK SPECIFICATIONS. PPE PAYED AREAS g� Y 2. SHAD BLANKET MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS. � INRAL "?syrep..g !^ qa.' ' BNX(FILL - PIP: AND HAUNCMNG -SAND kx' S NOON Y S.8' NO INSULATION REINWRFD > MUCK. CLAY. URGE ROCKS DIAMETER), OR NO MATERIAL DETERMINED ENGINEER THAT WALL NOT BE SUITABLE. ( ) DENSITY PSHAU (FIFE) ION.BEDDINGME CUSHION. MEET REWIREN. OF HAl1NCHING " UJRIIWORI( SPECIFICATION. '� +., . � - 1. PIPE ANDDMENG 1. HOPE PPE AND FITTINGS $HALL BE FABRICATED SPECIFIED IN ASTM 03350. BEDDING r,�i,:,ea„.. .:�;; n�..;; _ t,„i � .; - ^' � R 2. HDPE PIPES SHALL BE JOINED BY MEANIE OF ZERO LA OR ELECIROFUSHON, PAID APPROVED MECWWICAl JOINTS, C9RAZE-HEAT-VISION, MEETING 111E SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS O AWWA C906. PIPE SIZES 3. GD SHALL BE AVAILABLE IN DUCTILE RON PPE SIZES -F UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS ENCWNIEAED UNDISTURBED SOl 4. PIPESRATED FOR A MORNING PRESSURE OF ACT RED HAVE A DIMENSION RATIO DR UI U.O. ( ) `o NOTIFY THE ENGINEER. SEE NOTES 5 AND 6. NAWL N 5. PPE AO FININGS SHALL BE DRSCOPDE PRISM 4000 AS MANUFACTURED BY DPoSCOPIPE OR APPROVED EOINNIM. AS AN _ UNDISTURBED MATH PUCE RIGID INSULATION (EXTRUDED BETWEEN SAND BLANKET BFKK OR CONCRETE PAD RON PIPE AM C151 1f�INGS: k S AND TRENCH BACIOILL, OVERLAP ALL DUCTILE IRON, STANDARD THICKNESS, 350 0 PRESSURE RATING. (AWWA CI10, C153, C105, ANSI A21.10). G 1. UNLESS 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ASSUME TYPE "C" SOILS. PERFORM ALL EXCAVATIONS TO OSHA REQUIREMENTS. SEMIS REFER TO APPLICABLE TABLE 2. FITTINGS: CAST IRON, 250 Pei PRESSURE RATING (ANSI A21.10). 2. BEDDING TO PROVIDE A FIRM, STABLE, CONTINUOUS AND UNIFORM SUPPORT FOR FULL LENGTH OF PIPE FOR WIDTH AND THICKNESS. �d 3. JOINTS MECHANICAL, PUSH --ON AND RANGED (AWWA Cl I1, C115). 3. MINIMUM DEPTH TO THE TOP OF THE WATERUNE SHALL BE 5'-6'. OTHERRMSE, REFER TO INSULATION OVER SHALLOW Ig1E 4 GASKETS: WATER LANE DETAIL 4. INSTALL WATER LIE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST ANNA STANDARDS. LOCKSHALBE THE SATE M FOR 1/4" <fIO (9O) 710RISf BLOCK THE AM TAMING AGAINST1/4'G NDUNDISTURBED91Y)THTHRUST A MECHANICAL AND PUSH JOINTS, ANSI A21.11. B. JOINTS: �" TACK RING OR FULL FACED RUBBER A51 A21.15. 5. 891OLL SHALL BE OF A SUITABLE MATERIAL REMOVED FROM EXCAVATION EXCEPT WERE OTHER MATERIAL IS SPECIFIED. l NUTS,FLANGED 5. BOLES/NUTS: DEBRIS, FROZEN MATERW, URGE CLODS OR STONES, ORGANIC MATTER. OR OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR BACKFILL WITHIN TWO FEET OF THE TOP OF THE PPE. (MAXIMUM STONE SIZE OF 61 1. REFER TO APPLICABLE TRENCH DETAIL FOR SPECIFIC BACKFRL INFORMATION. A MECHANICAL JOINT: ANSI A21.11. B. HANGED JOINT' A21.15. 6. LEDGE, ROCK, BOULDERS AND LARGE STONES SHALL BE REMOVED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM CLEARWE OF SIX INCHES 6 . MECHANICAL JOINT GLANDSDS SHALL BE "MEGA -LUG" RETAKEN GLANDS.BELOW Z AND ON EACH SIDE OF ALL PIPES. WATERLINE TRENCH INSULATION OVER SHALLOW WATERLINE TRENCH TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE DETAIL 7. LININGS AND UNING REPAIR TO AWWA/ANSI C104. A INTERIM - CEMENT UNm, DOUBLE THICKNESS BITUMINOUS SEAL B. EXTERIOR- BIIIIMINOLS CCATING APPROXIMATELY 2 MILS THICK, ANSI A21.15, ANSI A21.15, AND ANSI A21.10. - - - 2 C FLANGE MACHINED FACE COATING: NN51 A21.15. 3 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE COPPER RIBBING I. TYPE-K, ANNEALED, 15T11 BBB. 2. FITTINGS: ASM: 816.18. CAST COPPER, OR ASIME B16.22, WROUGHT COPPER. 3. JOINTS: COMPRESSION CONNECTION OR AWS A5.8, BCuP SILVER BRAZE. BB E CHLORINATION OF DOMESTIC WATER ONES Z g 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING ANY DSINFECIION OF WATER MANS. AA a e 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL TESRNG AS REQUIRED BY THIS SPECIFICATION AND REFERENCE W � f $ 9 S STANDARDS MENTIONED. 3. DISINFECT ALL NEW PIPELINE SYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C651. INCLUDING: IOW Z = 1 a A METHOD OF CHLORINE APPICATI N. USE CONTINUOUS FEED METHOD OR SLUG METHOD. (TABLET METHOD) 5 NOT ACCEPTABLE.) ~ S ; m ; B. FORM OF CHLORINE UTUZED. Z W r a C. FINAL FLUSHING. D. BACIEPoOOGICAL TESTING. W 3 E. RUTOTION OF PROCEDURE GATE WM 1. RSIIENT SEAT GATE VALVES BY KENNEDY 'KEN -SEAL" OR EQUAL 2. IRON BODY GATE VALVES TO MEET AWWA C-509-87. O 3. STEM CONSTPoICITON: NON -RATING. 4. STEM SFAS: DOABLE O-RING. 5. GATE: CAST IRON fE511FM WEDGE WITH SYNTHETIC ELASFOMER COATING, AND SHALL BE EPDXY COATED (FUSKN BONGED) INSIDE AND OUT. 6. BONNET HARDWARE SHALL MEET ASTM A307, CADMIUM RATED. U r1 7. OMELET CONNECTION: STANDARD MECHANICAL JOINT. 7 8. OPERATION: OPEN COUNTERCLOCKWISE TAPPING SLEEVES AND VALUES Fi u3oi 'L o TAPPING MMUI S EIWE„3 m 1. TAPPING VALVES TO NEST ANSI/AWWA C509-87, STANDARD FOR RESILIENT SEATED GATE VALVES. ¢ + 2. VALVES SHALL KIN 1 E A Wf" WORKING PRESSURE OF 150 PSI. v 3. VALVES SHALL OPEN COUNTERCLOCKWISE. 4 INLET FIANCES SHALL BE CUSS 125. ANSI 816.1, OR ANSI/AWWA CI IO/A21.10. .U r 5. OUTLET CONNECTION: STANDARDIZED MECH KCAL JOINT. 6. STEM SEAS: 0 RING. u ^ i z m 7. STEM CONSTRUCTION: NON -RATING. 8. SEATING: PARALLEL SEAT. H" m 'm 9. ENO CONNEC110N5: MECHANICAL ON RUN, FLANGED ON BRANCH, 10. BURIED TAPPING VALVES SHALL BE PROVIDED Will A 2 NCH SQUARE WRENCH NUT AND CAST RON VALVE BOX IF DEPTH FROM c U GRADE TO TOP OF VALVE OPERAT14G NUr IS GREATER THAN 6'-0. A VALVE STEM RISER MADE OF HIGH SIRENGIH STEEL. STALL BE ° N PROVIDED. DEPTH FROM VALVE STEM RISER NUT TO GRIME SHALL BE 4 TO 6 FEET. u U V� 1. AWWA C�5U99,, LATEST REVISIO . AWWA C207, CLASS D, WORKING r.l 2. MAX. PRESSURE OF 150 PSI. 3. SLEEVES: SPIT SLEEVES OF CAST IRON OR DUCTILE IRON. W 4. MECHANICAL JOINT ENDS WITH END AND GOO SEALS. 5. PROVIDE A 3/4" NP TEST RUG OR OTHER PROVISION FOR O AIR TESTING THE VALVE AND SLEEVE AT MAMMON WORMING PRFSSUR:. 6. BOLTS AND MESS. MECHANICAL JOINTS: HIGH STRENGTH GIST IRON OR NOR SIREW:M LOW ALLOY STEEL ANSI/AWWA Cl 11/A21.11-90. •J rr��----1� 7. BOLTS AND MESS, FLANGED JOINTS: HIGH STRENGTH, LOW CARBON STEEL CONFORMING TO ANSI/AWWA C110/A21.10-87, APPENDIX A 0 8. COAT ALL NUTS AND BOLTS WITH A RUST RESISTANT LUBRICANT. 9. ALL BOLTS AND NUTS USED WITH PPE SLEEVES SHALL BE BRUSH COATED HEAVILY AFTER FINAL TIGHTENING W1FH BITAMSTIC O COD -APPLIED MATERIAL MIL TO THOROUGHLY COVER ALL EXPOSED SURFACES OF BOLTS AND S. a F•'•I -` W v VALVE .ABOXESCEPWAE MANUFACTURER'S MOELLER, CROW. OR EQUAL 2. CLOW F-2452 SLIDING TYPE TWO PIECE Q OR EQUAL 3. 5 1/4 INCII SHAFT. 4 SITE 66(b-60 NCH OVERALL LENGTH). �1 L W (n R E C E I V E 5. CASON. T IRON. 6. GLOW F-2490 LADS OR EQUAL 7. THE WORD 'WATER" TO BE CASE INTO TOP O GOERS, AND PROW SHOWING DIRECTION O OPENING.CONCRETE C^ 33 A FrFFFyyyQHHH 7 1 CLASS B COMREE SHALL HAVE: W JAN 2 2009 - A MIN. COMPRESSIVE SIREIGTH OF 30DO PSI AT 28 DAYS. B. NR ENTRAINMENT OF 4% TO 6% BY VOLUME. rTl [~ M C. WATER CEMENT RATIO OF 0.49 LBS WATER/CEMENT. D. SLUMP OF 2 TO 4 INCHES. CityeA_ �.j I� PM Iy Soy sUl /�l /�t�' 1 2. PLACE NO CONCRETE WHEN AMBIENT TEMPERATURE 5 BELOW 40 DEGREES FAIRENHET OR MORE THAN 90 DEGREES FAIRENHEIT. 3. NO CONCRETE SHALL BE DROPPED MORE THAN SO FEET INSIDE A FORM. I3 .--1 .--1 U V � �,/'fi/ �JI 4. MAINTAIN TEMPERATURE OF CONCRETE SURFACE AT MINIMUM 50 DEGREES FA RENHEIT FOR 72 HOURS AFTER PULING CONCRETE. PREHEAT ALL ENCLOSURES FOR A MINIMUM OF 2 HOURS TO PROVIDE A MIN. SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF 45 DEGREES FAIRENHEIT. 5. ALLOW TO SET AND CURE ALL THRUST BLOCKS. CONCRETE SUPPORTS, AND ANCHORS A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS BEFORE BACKFIWNG. - _ 6. COMPLETELY CURE AND SET CONCETE BEFORE ANY HYDROSTATIC OR LEAKAGE TESTING OF PRUNE SYSTEMS. 7. NONSINK (ROUT SMALL BE WALCO TRADEMARK, AS MVAIFACNRED BY LFHN d FINK INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS. S 8. DO NOT RACE MY MORTAR OR C 0A WHEN AMBIENT TEMPERATURE IS BELOW 40 DEGREES FA RENHEIT 9. MORTAR FOR MANHOLES SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: A CEMENT -TYPE II, ASTM C150. B. HYDRATED LIME -TYPE N, ASTM C207. Designed By: I'llC. SA Q_ ASTTI C 33, FINE AGGREGATES FOR CONCRETE D. WATER -CLEW, SURABLE FOR DRINKING. Chxked By: PIS10. Drawn By: KB MIX (BY VOLUME): 1 PART CEMENT, 1/2 PUTT ENE 4 1/2 PARTS SHAD. Scale: NONE GENIERAL 1. "AS BUILT' DRAWINGS SHALL BE PREPARED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE TIME OF COPIETION OF THE SYSTEM. Date: NOV 7. 2008 FOR DRB REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 /20/09 ,{J CECT 07202 NARROW SURFACE 1"A" LENGTH O OPEN AS SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM NOTES Naaow AS PRAC7SHALL KEPT IIG.TH OF UM.CLEANICUT RING AMID COVER PAVED UNPAGED TRENCH SIII11 BE IEPW ro A MINIMUM. IFBARON No. U0B10 UBLED REFER TO APPICABLE DETAIL FOR LOAN. SEED, AND MULCH. OVIRFRL FOR 'CLEAN -CAT' PICOCABIE SW0 THREADED DEPARTM NT OF HE CONFORM ro O REGULS DETAILED IN THE LOLL PUNK WORKS SPECIFICATIONS AND THE NEW THAN STATE PJC GIP OPNTIIEM O HEALTH RULES Ifm REWWONS. CONTRACTOR 6 !RESPONSIBLE FOR RUDING AND FOLLOWING THE FULL COMPLETE PAVEMENT AND PAVi1QR SUBBASE SETRE ENF. FINISHED CRUDE EDOIONS PROVIDED BY THE MUNICIPALITY AM THE STATE PAVED UNPAGED A. MATERIALS: BUGT ESEIM BUIL A WLETHE BUILDING SEVER SI ARE O CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNER G WHICH WILL PIPES L35 AST BLEPI(ING OR CLOGGING. eA:lO1LL O' %IITPBLE MAINE MAll]Fllt AIXIPOBLE MA1F1DW5 FOR THE SEWER NE RUWER-RNG-JOIMEO PYC CRANIAL SEWER PIPE SDRJS ASTY DJQ14. THREADED PVC ADAPTER, SEE7-- B. SUNG AND SLOPE MINIMUM BU4DNG SEWER SIZE IS 4 INCHES (UNLESS SHOW ON THE PLAN) AIAI A MINIMUM SLOPE IS 1/4 INCH COMPACTED IN 8' MAX. UFIS TO 95% NOTE 1. PER FOOT. Stamp �RW STANDARD OTIMIUM DENSITY DF COMPACTED IN 12' LETS TO 90% I SOLD PVC PIPE SEE NOTE 1. C. MANHOLES: BUDDING SLOW A DISGMRORG - A RRIBUIIW SEWER SFVll BE CONNECTED THROUGH A WHOLE OR WITH A W1E s 5<WP+RD OPTMMN DENSITY 0. CLING SO UT : DIRECT FLOW AND PRO N-UNIE EACH HORENM IZONTAL INSULATION IN PAVED NIFAS: INSULATION N UNPAVED AREAS: Dom• SEE 1KTE 1 0. ClESNNOT WATER TI5 EVE BE PI' AMID AT EACH CATER ONES E DESIGN IN DIRECTION B THE BUILDING SEWER GREATER THAN 45 DEGREES, NOT GREATER TYN EVERY IOU' WD WHERE NOKAIED W THE DESIGN OUWNGG BUILDING SEWER CRINGES N DIRECTION 4 SAID BLANKET. MEET REWIREMEIRIS COWER UML WIDTH NSUL THICKNESS COVER INSUL WO1H NSUL THICKNESS SOLID PLC PIPE SEE NOTE 1. RffER M APPLICABLE TRENCH WHICH EXCEED 45 DEGREES SHOULD BE MADE WITH TWO 45 DEGREE ELLS OR LONG SWEEP FIRINGS. MANHOLES ARE ACCEPTABLE IN OF FARTIAWXK SIVECIFIG11mN. 0'-3' INER DRAIN C0 LOWER ORAN DETAIL FOR SPECIFIC EMOU LL LIEU OF CFAN MUM WHERE BUILDING SHAPERS ARE TO BE INSTALLED AT A DEPTH OF LESS mW 3 FELT UNDER DRIVEWAYS ARE 3'-4 8'-0' 3' 2'-3' 6'-0' 3' AND PPE NSTNUTION ANTICIPATED. EXIIU HEAVY CAST ION PPE SHALL BE USED. PPE W WILE. THROUGH NONCH SHALL INFORMATION E UAKAE BUILDING SEEM SHALL MEET THE LEAKAGE STANDARDS PRESUMED IN THE STATE OF VERMONf SPECIFICATIONS (EPR INRA 4'-5 4'-0' 2' 7'-4' 4'-0' 2' BE SINE SIZE AS SEWER PPE CHAPTER I). SEE A-02, J' BELOW FOR MORE DETAIL BNCKFILL PIPE BEDDING AND HAUNCH IG - SKID REFER TO NOTE 1 FOR SIZE OF CUSHION. MEET REQUIREMENTS OF > 5' ND INSUL REOUIRED > 4' NO INSU. REWRED WYE BRANCH. USE ELBOW AT PONT A lom BIDDING G FNLTHWORN SPECFlG1mN. OF TERMINATION. A OR SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM IS THAT SYSTEM OF SEWERS THAT TRANSPORT WASTEWATER FROM BUILDING SEWERS TO THE WASTEWATER BEDDING a ;'; ri.' " 4 `' TRIATMENT/DISPOSAL SYSTEM. - B 140 CONNECTIONS OF ROOF DRAINS. AREA DRAINS, FOUNDATION DRAINS, CELLAR DRAINS OR OTHER CLEAN WATER SOURCES OR ANY z Y' STORM DRAINS WILL BE ALLOWED TO BUILDING OR COLLECTION SEWERS. F UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS ENXmC. THE 51ff OF COLLECTION SEWERS SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. m i 24' NOTIFY THE ENGINEER SEE NOTES 5 AND 6. 0. DEPTH: SEWERS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY DEEP TO PREVENT FREEZING. RIOD FOAM INSIIIATI N SHALL BE USED. WERE INDICATED ON SNKW ma TRENCH N01@ DRAWINGS. PoL____ UNDISTURBED MATERIAL PUCE FWD BETWEEN AM MARK E SLOPE. VELOCITY: ALL SIEMENS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH NOT OAS THAN THE SLOPES SHOWN BELOW: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ASSUME CLASS 'C' SOWS. PERFORM ALL EXCAVATIONS ro OSHA REQUIREMENTS, AND T R E CH �� SAND BLANET SANITARY SEWER PPE 2. BEDDING TO PROVIDE A FIRM, STABLE coNDN0005 AND UNIFORM SUPPORT FOR FULL LENGTH OF PIPE AND TRENCH BAIOILL. OVIIeM ALL SEAMS. REFER ro APPLICABLE TABLE REFER TO PLANS FOR PIPE PIPE 9ZE rNCIE51 $LOPE rFEET/100 FEET o 3. FOR BUILDING SEWERS THE MINIMUM DEPTH TO THE TOP OF THE PPE WALL BE 4'-0'. WHERE BUILDING SEWERS ARE TO BE FOR WIDTH AND THICKNESS. SIZE, MATFTIN, INVERT INSTALLED AT A DEPTH LESS THAN S-O' UNDER ORNEWAYS, EXTRA HUH' CAST IRON OR OTHER HIGH STRENGTH PPE SOUL BE USED. AND SLOPE 6' 0.40 8' 0.40 OTHERWISE REFER TO INSULATION OVER SHALLOW SEWER LINE DETAIL SANITARY CFANOUT NOTES: 4. FOR SEWER COLLECTION SriiwS THE MI IMUY DEAN TO THE TOP OF THE PIPE SHALL BE 5'-0'. THIS DEPTH SHALL BE INCREASED I. ALL CIEMMT RISER PIPE AND Flam %ALL BE V DWAEFER WHEN THE SEWER PIPE IS LESS THAN 6' DIAMETER F. CHANGES N MAINTAIN SIZE WHEN E SMALLER SEWER JOINS A LARGE ONE, THE INVERT OF THE URGER SEWER SHILL BE LOWERED 5. ICKI' l. AREAS E F SUITABLE WRING THE WINTER MONTHS. XC VATION EXCEPT REFER ro INSULATION OVER SHALLOW SEWER LANE DETAIL SUFFICIENTLY ro C SOR . A SAME D34. WITH GRADIENT. 5. M MA N, BE O A SIIITABIE WRwWI GAMIC M FROM EXCAVATION IXCBLE MO OTHER SHALL NOT 6 USED HOD. DEBRIS, 1. REFER ro APPLICABLE 7RwCH DETAIL FOR SPECIFIC BACKFlLL INFORMATION. AND O DIAMETER FOR ALL SEWER PIPE 6' N HORIZONTAL EC AND GREATER G L MATERIAL PVC SIIR TO ASfM 031INFI WITH PUSH --ON GA%KEIED JOLTS. CASKETS SHALL INTO TO ASN D3212. SERER JOINTS FROZEN TWO FEET LARGE CODS OR E PIPE ORGANIC MA17ER, OR OTTER UNSTABLE MAIETMLS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR BNXOWL 2. CI5 DEG S SHALL BE PROVIDED AT FNOT HORIZONTAL 100 FEET. N DIRECTION OF THE SEWER PIPE CHEESIER THAN STALL O CONSTRUCTED O MN BOULDERS ERS AND LA GEm O ES SHALL THE ENTRANCE OF ROOTS IA M THE CLEAR WITHIN TWO FEET O' THE LOP OF 11E PIPE 45 DEGREES AND AT INTERVALS O' NOT MORE TIHNI 1 W FEET. H. TRENCHING: LEDGE. ROCK BOUNDERS AND LARGE STONES SHALL BE REMOVED ro PROVIDE A MINIMUM CIF/RA1O OF FOUL NICHES , 6. KEDGE. ROCK EXCALM AMID URGE SLOES SHALL BE REMOVED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM CLEARANCE OF FOUR NICHES BELOW AND 3. CLFNIOIF RISER ASSEMBLY PPE MATERIAL SHALL MATCH SANITARY SEWER PIPE WATERAL BELOW AND ON EACH SUE OF ALL PIPES. ON �H %°� OF AL P�ANITARY SEWER TRENCH DETAIL INSULATION OVER SHALLOW SEWER LINE DETAIL SANITARY CLEANOUT DETAIL I. BEDDING: SEE ERa1 TITHES LOO TOR STONES. FOR ORGANIC TRENCH OTHER UNSTABLE E ATA SINTIBIE RAIAE MATERIAL FREE FROM �\ DEBRIS, FROZEN MATERIAL. UPON URGE CLODS OR STONE, ORGANIC MATTER, THE D EWE U IN SHALL L EA IB �1 �\ J. LEAKAGE HEST$: UPON CONPIE110N O SEWER MAIN CONSOUCImN, THE SEWER LINE SIWL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE � NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE SCALE: NONE STATE OF VERMOIT SPECIFICATIONS (EPR - CHAFFER 1. APPENDIX Al. IFN(ADE TESTS FOR GRAINY SEWERS MIN FRAME A SOLID COVER BY UEBARON NOLC 268 OR FINISH GRADE BITUMINOUS EWES, CAST THE WORD SEWER' IN TOP OF THE COMER PORN A PRESSURIZED AIR TEST ON THE GRAVITY LINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VBNONF E7IVIR)NMENTAL PROTECTION RULES ON EACH BL 20'-0' OR LESS 20'-0' OR LESS PAVEAQNr SECTION OF THE GRAINY SEWER. THE ENGNEER 9ULL BE GIVEN 24 HOURS NOTICE BEFORE THE TEST IS CONDUCTED. TEST MUST BE 99 wKTW (FOR MM'a ^� ��� FIN6HED GRADE WITNESSED BY THE ENGINEER Z - 5 2 2'-0' 2'-0' T pw ; N PAYED MFN 5 C YORWNt (FOR YIYe pllm ALL OPLLIICS IN 111E TEST SECTION. ADD M IIITIL THE INTERNAL PTA O THE LANE 6 RAISED ro APPROXIMATELY 4.0 W W COMPANY MIN. dF 2 I!D III(. NOT N PAVED AAFA) cc CLASS TH' 7ELFPFIONE Y OF 6 COARSES OF OPENING POLINDS/SOUATE NCN (PSI) GRATER 71MW THE AVERAGE PRESSURE O' ANY GROUND WATER. MIEN THIS PRESSURE 6 REACHED, ALLOW IAa OPDIIm TIE PRESSURE TO STABUZE. THE PRESSRE WILL NORMALLY DROP AS THE NR TEMPERATURE STABILIZES. THE USIWLY TIES 2 TO 5 7 3 CONgEIE PER NEC ND BURNED BR HAND CONICAL LOP MINUTES DEPENDING ON THE PIPE SUE THE PRESSURE MAY BE REDUCED TO 3.5 PSI BEFORE STARTING THE TEST. Z H r E 5' MIN. STOW BLWMw NECK. ID o ELLCfRIC DRAIN MORTARED 5/8' THICK 4 STARE THE TEST WHEN THE PRESSURE HAS STABLIZED AND IS AT OR ABOVE THE STARTING TEST PRESSURE OF 3.5 PSI ABOVE THE Z WIJ W IXTD80R SURFACE PRESSURE OF ANY GROUNDWATER IF THE PRESSURE DROPS MORE THAN 1.0 PSI DURING THE TEST THE THE UN: 6 PRESUMED TO LAJ S ` SANITARY SEWER MAIN •. WATER COPOLYMER PRECAST CONC. PAVE FILED THE LEST. E A I.O P% CHOP DOES NOT OCCIIN WITHIN THE TEST TINE, THE LANE HAS PASSER THE TEST. THE HEST THE 2.MANHOLE STEPS RISER SECTIONN SHALL BE DOW FROM THE FOLLOWING TABLE. IF THE SECTION OF LINE TO BE TESTED INCLUDES MORE THAN ONE PIPE SIZE, CALCULATE T, 3 10' YIN. MORTAR ALL THE TEST TIME FOR EACH SIZE AND ADD THE TEST TAPES TO ARRW AT THE TOTAL TEST TIME FOR THE SECTION.rill EXTERIOR JOINT FLEXIBLE BTUIWSDC PIPE SITE T (TI/F7 B FLEXIBLEwramLE SFAUMMT. ALL JOINTS. SOW LAYER (INCHES) (YN/100 FT.) %ERE. BY LOG( 11/�' WIDTH 3 0.2 PER UTILITY JOINT OR EQUAL 4 0.3 WATER MAIN GAS COIIPNN 5' YIN 6 0.7 8 1.2 SEWER OVER MA1Bl• 2' STUB MIN. 48' I.D. GRWIgM SACKFUL 10 MOT RECOMMENDED 4' SIB. MAX. MATERIAL MEETING 12 -ADWrED FROM PENNICNUGK WATER WORKS, INC. STANDARD DETAIL A -I. FWLSMED ' REOUIRF31ENI5 1 Ti, OF FARRINIM X. INSTALLATION: PPE SHALL BE TAB WITH BELL ENDS FACING UPGRADE AND LAYING SHALL START AT THE DOWNGRADE END. ONE STANGYD FULL LENGTH OF 14 BARS 6' o.c 4 SPECFIOTON. L WATER LINE SEPARATIONF W c w WATER MAIN TO BE CENTERED OVER BOTH WAYS, BASE Qv a. HORIZONTAL SEPARATION: SEWERS SHALL BE LAID FLAT AT LEAST TER FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED SEWER+, AND WAILS 'Ai . `• WATER MAN. THE h VL 1. WATER MAN RELATIONS TO SEWER SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR WTpICI1NTO BE TER WORKS' PRECAST NIC MH "AM IC SHALL BE MEASURED EDGE TO EDGE rn ate„ WATER MAN ID SO-CILTER STATE STANDARDS. C BASE CONSTRUCTED ONLY W U �o 2. WATER MANS SHALL BE LAD AT !FAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY EXISTINGSEWERS. THE OR PROPOSED SEWTHE DWANCE BALL r�i°T AFTER PASSAGE OF WWIFAE IMPOSSIBLE OR IMPRACTICABLE WE 70 LEDGE, BOATERS OR OTHER Um%D1 CONDITIONS, TO WJMNN THE lw HOOF .'�' z P. BE MEASURED EDGE TO EDGE IF THIS DISTANCE CANNOT BE OBTAINED, THEN THE PIPES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A SEPARATE TRENCH MIN LEAKAGE TEST SEW!"TER PIPE AT W ELEVATION SO THE BOTTOM O THE WESTER MAIN 6 AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER. °°°°°o°°o°°a°°° °o°°o°°o°e°°o°° UIGN RBwONTASEPARATION EP�� BETWEEN SEWER AND WATER UNES, THE WATER LINE MAY BE IN A SEPARATE TRENCH OR ON W W Q SELECT BAMIFILL CUMPACTw 3. WHEN R IS IMPOSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN 19' VERTICAL SEPARATION OR WHERE THE SEWER MUST BE LAID ABOVE THE WATER MAIN; IN 6' LAYERS- 95x A THE CN)S%NCI SHALL BE ARRANGED 50 THAT ONE FULL IFNCTH OF SEWER IS GNEIED ABOVE OR BELOW THE WATER UNDISTURBED MATERIAL 3/4' dia. CRUSHED SHONE SHELF IN THE SEWER TRENCH PROVIDED THAT OF T THE BOTTOM THE WATER LINE 5AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY A. WITH SEWER JOINTS AS FM AS POSSIBLE FROM WATER JOINTS; MANHOLEN01ES SEWER WHENEVER IMPOSSIBLE OR IMPRWTMII TO MOUNTAIN THE IB INCH VERTICAL SEPARATION, THE SEWER LANE SHALL M r B. THE SEWER PIPE MUST BE CONS RUCED TO WATER MAN STANDARDS FOR A MIN" DISTANCEOF20 FEET EITHER SIDE 1. INVERTS OFMANHOLES SHALL BE UNED WITH RAND BRICK. CONST UCTED TO NORMAL WATER LINE STANDARDS AND PRESSURE IFSTED TO 50 PSI FOR 15 MINUTE PRIOR TO BAGOIWG. NO _ , U o SANITARY SEWER MAIN OF THE CROSSING OR A TOTAL Of THREE PIPE LENGTHS, WHICHEVER IS WATER; 2. PROVIDE SMOOTH SWEEPING TRANSITIONS BETWEEN INVERTS OF INTERSECTING PPE LEAKAGE SNAIL BE ALLOWED FOR THIS TEST. U H C. THE SECTION CONSTRUCTED TO WATER OWN SCNDADS MUST BE PRESSURE TESTED TO MAINTAIN 50 PSI FOR 15 MINUTES 3. E DEPTH O MANHOLE S. 7 R OR LESS FROM NOW TO CTTERIN: EVENT. TEN A FLAT TOP WILL BE NSTNIID. IF DEPTH O WITHOUT LEAKAGE PRIOR TO BACKI LLNG BEYOND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE PPE TO ASSURE WATER tNITNE55. MANHOLE FROM RE N TO CENTERU INVERT IS MORE TAN 7 R. TEN A CONICAL TOP WILL BE INSTALLED. L CROSSINGS SEWERS CROSSING WATER MANS SHALL BE AND BENEkTH THE WATER MAIN WITH AT LEAST 18 INCHES VERTICAL . ALL MATERIALS TO MEET VT -APR REOIIIEIONS. CLFARNICE BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE SEWER AND THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER YIN. WHEN IT 6 IMPOSSBF TO MAINTAIN THE 18 WATER an UTILITY SEPARATION EPARA,mN, SANITARY MANHOLE DETAIL 1. THE CROSSING %Au BE AIWNOD S THAT FONEROM FULL LENGTH OF SEWER IS cwIETED ABOVE DR BELOW THE WESTER ►..a F., LINE WITH SEWER JOINTS AN FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE FROM WESTER JOINTS; 6 SCALE: NONE 5 2. THE SEWER PIPE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE O 20 FEET EITHER SIDE NOT TO SCALE OF THE CROSSING OR 3. THE SECTION CONSTRUCTED TO PRICHEVENI ( WATER MAIN STANDARDS MUST BE PRESSURE C STESTED TO MAINTAIN 50 PSI FOR 15 MINUTES WITHOUT LEAKAGE PRIOR TO BACKFILNG BEYOND ONE FOOT ABOVE THEPIPE TO ASSURE WATER TIGHTNESS: 4. WHERE A WATER MAN CROSSES UNDER A SEWER. ADEQUATE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE SEWER O (1 TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE WATER MAIN. WHET PIPE DUNEIER THE MINI" DIAMETER OFMANHOLES SALL BE 48 NWS6 LARGE R DIAMETERS ARE FOR CONNECTION TO URGE r� a WA1EA TIGHT CEMENT (� oz DIAMETER SEWERS A MIN" ACCESS ONMETER OF 24 INCHES SHALL BE PROAADED. B. FLOW CHANNEL FLOW CHWNELS SNAIL BE PROVIDED IN THE BASE OF ALL MANHOLES AND TE FLOW CANNEL THROUGH MANIOES J NOR-N-SEA RUBBER BOOT SHOUID BE MADE TO CONFORM IN SHAPE AND SLOPE TO THAT O THE SEWERS. W C. NUMK LES SHALL BE O THE PRE -CAST CONCRETE OR POUR -IN PUCE CONCRETE TYPE. MANHOLES SHALL HE WATERPROOFED ONTHE EXTERM, SFAINLLSS STEEL ILIMP D. INLET AND OUTLET PIPES SHALL BE JOINED TO THE MANHOLE WITH A RUBBER-GASKEJED FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT CONNECTION THAT ALLOWS DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMFNf O THE PPE AND MANHOLE WALL TO TAKE PLACE. DRAINAGE PPE VVim�,, r�1 E. ALL MANHOLES SHALL BE TESTED FOR LEAKAGE. LEAKAGE TESDHG O GRAVITY SEWERS UTILIZING THE WATER TESTING PROCEDURES ✓�/' W Q • TIES INTO ACCOUNT THE LEAKAGE FROM ONE MANHOLE IN THE TEST SECTION. OTHERWISE MWHOLES SHALL BE TESTED FOR LEAKAGE IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE Q7 W FAQ s AFTER THE MANHOLE HAS BON ASSEMBLED IN PLACE AL LIFTING HOLES AND EXTERIOR JOINTS SHALL BE FRIED WITH AMID FI POKED WITH AN NPPTOVED NOT-%I8NI(NG YORfNt ALL PIPE AID OTHER OPENINGS INTO THE NAME SHALL BE SUITABILY PLUGGED AND THE PLUGS RACEDro PREVENT BLDIAMT. EACH MANHOLE SHALL BE CHECKED FOR INFILTRATION BY FLUNG WITH WATER TO THE TOP OF THE CONE SECTION. A SUBILUTION z Q� PERIOD O ONE HOUR SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ALLOW FOR BSORPTION. AT THE END OF THE PERIOD, THE MNNHO E 944L BE REFILLED TO THE TO' O THE DONE, IF NECESSARY, AID THE MEASURING TIME O AT LEAST SIX HOURS BEGUN. AT THE END OF THE (/] QI U .r TEST PERIOD, THEMAOmLE SHALL BE REFILLED TO THE TO' OF THE CONE MEASURING THE VOLUME OF WATER ADDED. THE AMOUNT SHAM BE CONVERTED TO A 24 HOUR RATE AND THE LEAKAGE DETERMINED ON THE BASIS OF DEPTH. THE LEAKAGE FOR EACH __ MAN SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE GALLON PER VERTICAL NOT FOR A 24 HOUR PERM FOR IXFlLTRATION AND TIRE SHA. BE NO - VUBLL INFILTRATION. EXISTING MANHOLE RECEIVED Deai9ned By: PB Checked By: Pill JAN 2 7 Lu0J Drawn By: KB ILDR�$FK NOTES:t Scale: NONE 1. CORE HOE SHALL BE SMOOTH, SYMMETRICAL AND APPROPRIATELY SIZED FOR Date: NOV 7. 2008 WAN PIPE NSWALLATI N. OR DRI REVIEW ONLY City of So. Budingt OT OR CONSTRUCTION KOR -N- SEAL MANHOLE CONNECTION 1/20/09 C3.1 SCALE NONE 6 PROJECT #07202 I. TRENCH SURFACE WIDTH SHALL BE KEPT AS NARROW AS PRACTICAL LENGTH OF OPEN PIQUED UMP/YFD TRINCH SHALL BE KEPT ro A MINIMUM. REFER ro APPLICABLE DETAIL FOR LOAM, SEED, AND MUCH. OVERFILL FOR CIFIM UT RING AND COVEN LFBARON No. LA0910 LABELED 'CLF/N-Wi 6' SOLD PVC GP NOTE AT ATINLEIIC FIELDS, COVEN WITH 4' BE 1O501 HOKERCOURSE (3/4" STONE) PERVIOUS ASPHALT PER SPEC. PAVEMENT AND PAVEMENT SINBASE SETREIENT. 1S BAGOU OF SUITABLE NATIVE MATERIAL IN 8' MAX. LIFTS TO 95% ir VERTICAL 6' SOLID PVC PPE (IYP.) _A COMPACTED STANDARD OPTIMUM DENSITY THREADED CO 14,,,,r• Ww V a'. 4r;a. ro S, ,, 1 0T COMPACTED IN 12' LETS TO 90% STANDARD OPITMOM LoGff U q SAND BIAND:T. MEET REQUIREMENTS OF FAIRHADRK SPECIFICATION. . 5 PIPE $ INRAL a PIPE BUM AND HNMCFNG - SHAD CUSHION. MEET REQUIREMENTS OF STORM GRIN REEK TO PLANS FOR PIPE • A 6' ITS BEND HIAUNCHING DMMYORK SPEOFlCYTON. ' SIZE MATERIAL, INVERT AND BEDDING,~', ,. SLOPE 6' SOLD PVC PIPE F L*MTTABLE MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED - 1% 10 ♦ 24' NOTIFY THE ENGINEER. SEE NOTES 4 AND 5. snow S9FR 1RFNClI NOTES. UNDISTURBED MATERIAL 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ASSUME CLASS 'C' SOILS. PERFORM ALL EXCAVATIONS M OSHA REQUIREMENTS. m 2. BEDDHO To PIROIDE A FIRM, STABLE, C0NTINU0115 AND UNIFORM SUPPORT FOR FULL LENGTH OF PIPE 3. THE MINIMUM DEPTH TO THE TOP OF THE PIPE SHALL BE 5'-0". THIS DEPTH SAWL BE INCREASED TO 6'-0' N AREAS ro BE PLOWED MIRAR 180N (OR APPR0VID EQUAL) DRAINAGE COURSE (3/4' TO 2' CLEW, CRUSHED STONE) O DURING THE WMIEt NONIH. THERWISE. REFER TO INSULATION OVER SALLOW SEWER LINE DETAIL S 4. BACIMUL SHALL BE BE A SOLRABIE MATERIAL REMOVED FROM EXCAVATION EXCEPT WHERE OTHER MATERIAL IS SPECIFIED. DEBRIS, 45' WOE THROUGH BRANCH SHALL GRAVEL FILTER COURSE (PEA STONE) FROZEN MATERIAL,LARGE CUBS OR STORES, ORGANIC MATTER, OR OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHAWL NOT BE USED FOR BACMLL STM Bpi CLEgpU Ipi6 BE SUE SIZE AS DRAWN WYE BRANCH SNAIL BE 6". USE ELM AT PORT WITHIN TWO FEET OF THE TOP OF THE PIPE 5. LEDGE. ROD(, BOULDERS AND URGE STOPS SHALL BE REMOVED 10 PROVIDE A MINOIUY CLEARANCE OF FOUR INCHES BELOW AND 1. REFER TO APPLICABLE TRENCH DETAL FOR SPECIFIC OF TERMINATION. ON EACH SOE OF AL PIPES. BA UL AND PIPE INSTALLATION NFORMAIpN. STORM SEWER TRENCH DETAIL ^ TYPICAL STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT DETAIL ^ PERVIOUS ASPHALT PAVEMENT DETAIL Nor ro SCALE SCALE NONE 10 SCALE. 1'-1' GET FRAME AND GRATE OVERFLOW 'CATCH BASIN' FINDS CJAABE A PLFOR OBs GRAVEL CURTAIN DRAWN OVERFLOW BEBI OUTLET CULVERT Z _ S 2 NMORTROT ED NFL)) CONCRETE SLAB TOP IRDEDRNN COLLECTION W 3 tl II' SYSTEM - . Lu Z 'R S $ g FIFIDOE PROVIDE GRASS S C VS01L AND CR0.55 COVER~RF GRASSED SWAIE WITH PEA WL' qLg, a7iP.. GRAVEL DIAPHRAGM TO 4SY" W W - 3 ALL VOMITS Si/INT-NIL JOINTS RETEAT PRDYBE PRETREATMENT % BADD MORTAR RIO( WE OPENINGS \% � 3 WOf. � 1 PLANTINGS TO ESTABLISH A DIVERSE DENSE PUNT COVER M TREAT STORMWATFR i RUNOFF AND WITHHSIAD URBAN STRESSES FROM INSECT AND 08Ek% WESTATION5, IN -^7 T.+ �r1,,, 0R0UHT. I MPERATINE AND WAND. PUNTour SPECIES AND NUMBER TO BE DETERMINED. y o G RMNIIIAR eAAIDIII ro EROSION CONTROL MATTING 2' MN -•-r BEAM '\ -M'^ r/J• Q MEET 1E0MI0ENIS O CNMNON BEE0FICATKHS UNDISTURBED ENT H ¢ F o = 5' N. 6,POruNGWA UME \ \ MI AR 14ON FILTER i \ FABIC OR EQUAL so 36i x�oL 2'-3" UILH .\ w U u � S ALE NOES s GI PRECAST MONOLITH I. PROVIDE CHANNEL UMNG S75 BY NORM AMERICN GREEN AS REQUIRED TO 2.5' - 4 _ _ _ i PLINRNG SOL PLANENG SOIL z O CONCRETE BASE STABUZE NEW VEGETATED SWAES. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. '� YEL LURTNN ORNN SO 6' PETF. MIRAFI 140N FILTER ¢ s UNDISTURBED W1EIA QRt11L L"+ � �� PIPE IN 8' FABRIC OR EQUAL .� -^ '.� o u e .,.,.-.-----------.,<,���� >.a.�.�. �ICATI0S GRAVEL V GRASSED DRAINAGE SWALE ...\...\.\..\.\.....,..\..\..\.....,..,.\..\.,..\..\...\..\..\, �'°'�"'� BIORETENTION DETAIL NOT 1. MI CATCH BASIN 6 7 FEET OR LESS FROM MOM ro CDA MART THEN RAT TOP HALL BE HANIID. F DEPTH O CATCH � ODMI E BASIN FROM RN TO CENERI/E MERE M MORE NNW 7 FEET REIN A CMrAL TOP HALL BE NSTNIID. N FROM Fill AND AT ALL �j 2 PROVWE A UMARON 24Y24' TALE E OR EQUAL, 3 FLANGE GRATE AND ERNE NEXT TO CURBS AND 4 FLANGE ORATE FRAME SCALE: NONE (r] Z OTHER LOCATIONS. 3. CATCH BASH AND GRATE SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR H2O LOADING. 3 ALL CATCH OWNS SAL HAVE A 12' SUMP. a CATCH BASIN DETAIL c �l� o SCALE: NONE ^ WW d�rc o Wx= RECEIVED JAN 27 o Q u� F� 1009 MY of So. Burlington Designed By: PIT Checked By: PB Drawn By: KB Scale: NONE Date: NOV 7. 2008 FOR ORB REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/20/09 C3.2 PROJECT #07202 MIRK, 14M FILTER FABRIC POST B/CKF1LL ROW GRADE / m� I ETIBED 16• MIN. i+L SECTION A -A A -A 6Y6' WOVEN ARE FENCE Nis (14 Gk TIN.) MOUNTABLE BERM EXBTNG PAVENENI 50' MINIMUM 2x IRA. m , o EXISTING GROUND °o °o°Oo°°°O FILTER FABRIC pR EpW."I,,," PROFILE � �\\I / / j/ r. q4 \ \'I IIVIII AA� / / V \\\\�� N I I \ \ ♦ ••• 1 I IA/ \ \\ \\`��'�•"",\\ /;.• S� � \•� /� /• \\ /� .• \� /(+/ '//• \�\ '�' / EROSION PREVENTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES Stamp GDEIVL NOTES 1. THERE BIIALL BE AN •ONSNE EROSION CONTROL PLAN COORDINATOR.* THIS INDIVIDUAL SHALL PRESENT ON -SITE FROM DAY-TO-DAY, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQURED BY THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. DETAILS AND NOTES, AREPROPERLYINSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. THE ON9IE 9010E CONTROL PION CODRDOWTOR RULE KEEP A WIEN RECORD OF INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION COMM FEATURES. A COPY OF THESE PLANS AND NSPECIION/MNNIENUICE RECOIBS SHALL ff KEPT OHSRE AT ALL TINES. 2. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONDUCTED N ACCORDANCE WITH HE TREY YORK STANDARDS AND SPECIFlCA7NN5 FOR AMON AND SEDIMENT CONTROL*. CO6ARNCIION SELUDOY YIR/Fl I/ON J� FILTER FABRIC q OR EQUAL FENCE POST - GRADE 10'-0' NAIL Su PEKE TOTES: BE PRE -FABRICATED EROSION CONTROL FENCE BY MIRAT OR EQUAL, OR CONSTRUCTED IN PLACE 1. SAT FENCE SHALL AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. 2. CONSTRUCTED IN PLACE SILT FENCE A WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TES OR STAPLES. B. TIER FABRIC TO BL FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WINE FENCE TES SPACED EVERY 24' AT TOP OF YID SECTION. C. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER, THEY SHALL BE OVEPoAPPED BY 6', FOLDED AND STAPLED. 3. INSPECTION SHALL BE FREQUENT (MINIMUM ONCE A WEEK AM MIER EVERY RAINFALL). MAIMEAfa SHALL BE PER- FORMED AS NEEDED, AND SEDIMENT RELINE) WHEN 'BULGES' DEVELOP IN SILT FENCE. SILT FENCE DETAIL 50' MINIMUM �' c _ EXCAVATED AREA (AS REQUIRED) 1. A PRE-COSTRUCRON CONFERENCE SHAWL R HELD AT LEAST ONE 'MET( PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, WITH THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER AND ENGINEER. THE CONDUCTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DELINEATED ON THE PUNS AND ANY ADDITIONAL MEASURES THAT ARE NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE EROSION. THE CONTRACTOR SHILL HAVE EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT ON SITE AT /11 TIMES. 2. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED FOR WORK PROPOSED DURING METE WAITER (BETWEEN OCTOBEti 15 AND MAY 1), SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1. 3. PRIOR TO ANY OTHER WORK, SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSTATED AS SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, AND ALONG THE BASE OF THE ALL SLOPES. THESE SHALL REMAIN N PUCE AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE PROJECT SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. 4. THE OOTRACTDR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTWR1/EXIT 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY OUTLET CONTROLS. AS NOTED ON PLANS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHAH N INSTALL LLEIOSTI T PROTECTION ON NG AND NEW CATCH BONS. 7. ALL EROSION AND STORYWATER CONTROL SYSTIMS SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFRR RAINFALL EVENTS (WITHIN 24 HOURS). NEEDED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED AS THEY ACCUMULATE µD PLACED N AREAS WHERE FURTIEi EROSION S UNLIKELY. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE 9. THE CONDUCTOR SHALL STABILIZE EXPOSED SLOPES AND SOILS AS SOON AS GRIMED AND MAINTAIN UNTIL ADEQUATELY VEGETATED. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE FNA GRADING OF SAE, PLACE TOPSOIL AND PERMANENTLY VEGETATE, LANDSCAPE AND MULCH. I I. AFTER THE SITES APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AS ADEQUATELY STABILIZED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RUM ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND INSTALL PERMANENT VEGETATION ON THE DISTURBED AREAS. _ _ 510E SLOPE 2:1 =T _ .I I =I FXCAVATED DEPTH, -- �I I I MIN. 1' - WK 2' BELOW TOP OF INLET -III I I �I I I''• -I -...- CONSTRUCTION WEN Anoms -' i - = _ III III _-I I I -I I I- III -III -III- / . I I III III- L• W� HOLES OW7°°'c L-I I - • III=I - - GRAVEL E CLOTH TO L HARDWARE CLOTH ro P110W DRAINS µD RESTRICT - - SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ..� III -III --. - -III-I i 1-DTI I -III - 0°0° EXISTING aDDID >e000e ga` s% b 10•-0' _ - - EImTNc PAVEMENT PLAN VIEW SfµII1ZFD CONNSIRUCIIOII DNTRµCE NOTES: q b 1. STONE SIZE USE 1-1/2' CRUSHED STONE 2. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION DURANCE SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THEENTRANCE 3. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS. THIS MAY REWIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEWND. REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPEUI DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 4. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL AT L BE ER EACH RAIN. 5. WHEELS SHALL BE CLEARED TO REMOVE MUD PRIOR TO ENIWNCE ONTO PUBLIC RIOHT-O-WAY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED. IT9WL BE DONE ON AN AM STABILZED WITH STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEV CE. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL 1. CLEAR THE AREA OF ALL DEBRIS THAT WILL HINDER EXCAVATION. 2. GRADE APPROACH TO THE INLET UNIFORMLY AROUND THE &SIN. 3. WEE' HOLES $WALL BE PROTECTED BY GRAVEL 4. UPON SAAFUZAIION O CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA, SEAL WEEP HOES, FILL BASIN WITH STABLE SOIL TO FINAL GILAOE, COMPACT T PROPERLY NO STABILIZE WITH PERMANENT SEEDING. DROP 0 P INLET PROTECTION DETAIL SCNF: NONE �� SCIIE: NONE SCALE HOME 11. PETER THE SIRES APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AS ADEQUATELY STABILIZED, IT SHALL BE THE OWNERS RESPONSIBILITY TO PREVENT EROSION AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. 1FIraw/ODIbYR1ICIION m" CONTROL MEASURES I. THE SMALLEST PRACTICAL AREA OF LOUD SHALL BE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE ME WRING DEVELOPMENT. WHEN LAM IS DISTURBED. THE DISTURBANCE SHALL BE KEPI TO THE SHORTEST PRACTICAL DURATION AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. DUST SHAH BE CONTROLLED WITH WATER DISTRIBUTED BY ATRUCK-MOUNTED SPRAY BAR. CALCIUM CHLORIDE (A15FIT0 M 144) OR SODIUM CHLORIDE (AASHTO M 143) SHALL BE USED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGNEER S. SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED GENERALLY 10 FEET FROM THE BASE O THE FILL SLOPES, OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, TEST SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE PROJECT SITE HAS SEEM STABILIZED. SFDWEM SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BOW THE SILT FENCE �IµD BECOMES 6 INCHES DEEP AT THE FENCE THE SILT FBICE WILL BL•: REPAIRED µ NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A PROPER SEDIMENT 4. INSTALL CHECK DAMS IN GRASS-UNED SWNES 50 FEET ON CENTER TO PREVENT SILT FROM/ WASHING INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEDIMENT SNAIL BE MOVED FROM BEHIND THE CHECK WAS WHEN IT BECOMES 6 INCHES DEEP. CHECK DAYS SHALL BE RELIVED MIEN VEGETATION IS ESTAAbHED. 5. DROP INLET PROTECTION SHILL BE PROVIDED MOUND ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED CATCH BASINS. PROTECTION SHALL ROAN UTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS NE STABILZED. SEDIMENT SHAM BE REMOVED FROM DROP INLET PROTECTION MIEN THE STORAGE CAPACITY HAS BEEN APPROXIMATELY SOIL FLLED, GRAVEL WILL BE CLEANED OR REPUTED MEN D NO LONGER DRAINS PROPERLY. EXCAVATED MATERIAL FROM EARTH EXCAVATION AND DITCH DOING SHALL BE RACED ONSIIE N A LOCATION TO BE APPROVED O BY THE OWNER AD/OR THE ENGINEER OR USED FOR PROJECT FILL MATERIAL IF DETERMINED SUITABLE BY THE OWNER'S RFPRESEMATK. C7 Z -5 V1 = Wy,E W Z H I.IJ 3 8 _ a .. fR g �J 3 S , BL AND FERTILIZER (SEE NOTE) \��\��\� ��/... 'TOPSOIL yM/QNEI Pl1 -:..; - E� N NAY OR STRAW (TYP). - TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECFIGMIN: (SEE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR PERMANENT SEEMING REQUIREMENTS) URBAN MIX GRASS SEED- FOR USE M GRASSED LAWN AREAS MOUND BUILDING AND PARKING NO'A CREEPING RED FESCUE 330 MID 0 60.0 LINE SEED ALOE CONSERVATION MIX GRASS $®- FOIL USE IN ILL OTHER AREAS X 81' WEIGHT LBS. LINE SEED PER ACRE TYPE OF SEED 50 15.0 SMOOTH BLROMECRA55 17 SA RYEGRA55 33 10.0 BIRD300i TREFOIL TO DOD LIVE NUIFS FOR S®ED NO WIRED TEAS FFATILIZER- tO l6 PER 1OOESF. SIRING SEEING FALL SEEDING LIME- fIO LBS. PER 10005f DOLOMITIC GROUND UY6TONE NOT LESS THAN 85% OF THE TOTAL CNBOHAIE TOP S(ML 4• WMYUY APPROVED TOPSOIL STRAW WIfN- 2 BALES PER IOOOS.F. µPLY BNOER OR NETTINGµ NEEDED 7. STOCKPILED MATERIAL (WPSOL. BORROW, ETC.) SHALL HAVE SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTED AROUND THE PERIMETER. THE STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION OFFSITE LOCATE STOCKPILES ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF DISTURBED AREAS. IF POSSIBLE. DURING WINDY CONDITIONS, STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE COVERED OR WATERED APPROPRIATELY TO PREVENT WIND EROSION.. 8. SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL HAVE EROSION CONTROL NETTING INSTALLED TO STABILIZE THE SLOPE µD REWIRE THE EROSION POTENTIAL NETTING SHALL BE BIODEGRADABLE WITH A 12 MONTH LONGEVITY. S1508N µ MANUFACTURED OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. INSTALL NETTING D.C. MULCHED SLOPES SO THAT ALL PARTS µIL IN CONTACT BE FT UEHING WITH WIRE STAPLES 3 FEET O.C. ro ENSURE FULL BONDING WITH SOIL SURFACE. THE SLOPE SURFACES SHOIAD BE LEFT SUGHRY ROUGHENED µD THE S WITH THE SOIL µO SHOULD NOT SMOOTH. F UA(E NOUNIS OF OFSIIE WATER WILL DAWN (MR THESE SLOPES, 1E1/PoRNO DIVERSION SNAILS SHALL BEi" INSTALLED UP SLOPE UNTIL THE SLOPE VEGETATION STABILIZES. PERMANENT BROWN CCNTROI MFASUM 1. GRASS UNED SWALES SHALL BE COVERED IN SURE TURF BODEGRADABLE SEED IMPREGNATED EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS. µFib WHICH EXHIBIT SIGNS OF EROSION SHALE BE RE -SEEDED IMMEDIATELY AND MAINTAINED UNTIL PO4AARENT VEGETATION HAS STABILIZED. 2. WHEN FINAL GAMES ARE REACHED IN AN AREA D SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN FIVE DAYS. +1 {y [•. � p � a' C F rc o N A U i Q' z 'y 0 s 7 v [AF] [ e'er,1. Q m :: V ci Bi 1. SEEDING AM MULCHING DISTURBED SIUABED ARM SMALL TAKE PUCE WITHIN 48 HIM OF FINAL. WADING. 00° $F. 2. MUCH: TYPICALLY BE HAY DR N SLOPES MAY BE GREATER µD SHALL BE APPLIED AT RITE IO 9 OVrRO0 NETTING MULCH SHALL NOT R PLACED ON SLOPES OF CRUDER Iliµ 3:1. SEED IMPREGNATED EROSION CONTROL NETTING SHALL BE USED IN I15 RACE. 3. S®: SEEDING SHALL OCCUR AFTER APR 15 µD PRIOR TO SFT'TEMBEA 15TR IN ORDER ORDER TO ESTABLISH A S OF WASS PRIOR TO GROUND FREEZING. SEED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH S® SPECIFICATION ON THIS SHEET. 4. COVER SEED WITH J INCH SOIL UNLESS A HYOROSEFDEt IS USED. 5. MULCH µCHORNG: SHAIl BE ACCOMPLISHED BY DEGRADABLE MULCH NETTING. USE WHEN SLOPES ARE GREATER THAN 10%. 6. TOPSOIL IM MULCHING NOT TO BE APPLIED N AREAS OF TRAVEL WAYS. SEEDED AND MULCHED AREAS DETAIL SCALE: NONE SEED SPECIFICATION E C I F I C AT I 0 N ^ SCALE: NONE 3. THE CONTRACTOR SNA1 BE RESPOSIWE FOR THE CONTINUED MAINTENANCE OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS, RaUDNG WATERING, UNTIL THE AREASNSPETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER OR ENDIEEN 4. AFTER THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES AND INSTALL PERMANENT VEGETATION ON THE DISTURBED AREAS. 5. RE -SEEDING SHALL BE DONE UNTIL ALL µFRS ARE COMPLETELY COVERED WITH A MATURE STAND OF GRASS. AN AREA SHALL BE CONSIDERED COVERED WHEN THE ENTIRE SURFACE CONTAINS A VERDUROUS STAR O GRASS. AREAS THAT, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, ARE PREDOIYNATELY WEEDS SHALL BE ROWED UP, FINE GRADED, FERTILIZED AND RE -SEEDED IN THE MANNER PREVIOUSLY SPECIFIED, EXERCISING CATION NOT TO CNISE DAMAGE TO NEW OR EXISTING PLANT MATERUL. EROSION COTR OL FOR WINNER CONSTRUCTIONV��-I 1. VANIER CONSTRUCTION IS THAT OCCURRING BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND MAY I. 2. WRITER APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FROM THE STATE WATER QUALITY DIVISION FOR WINTER CONSTRUCTION AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE MANILA CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES OUTLINED N THE NURMONI HANDBOOK FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEOMENT CONTROL ON Z � � ^ F W y '� O i�C,yj Q7V O ~ `/ w CONSARUC 10N SITES'. AREA AND AMOUNT OF D6TUmmu SNWL BE MINIMIZED. J. ESTABLISH VEGETATION IN ALL NON WRIER CONSTRUCTION AREAS PRIOR TO OCfOBER 15. 4. ALL DISTU AREAS SOUL BE STABILIZED BY ONE O THE FOLLOWING METHODS; PAVING, BUILDING OR JUTE MESH (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. W A = �, 5. SEDIMENT TRIPS SHAH BE INSiN1ED WHERE INDICATED TO COLLECT SIRING 111E SEDIMENT RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL STONE CHECK DINS, SILT FECES, SNOW FENCES, OR DIVERSION SWNES MAY BE NECESSARY DEPENDING ON THE MOUNT AND LOCATION OF THE WINTER DISTURBANCE. 6. EROSION CONTROL ME49J ES SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY µ0 ALTER CAN STORM, MORE FREQUENT INSPECTIONS WILL BE NECESSARY DURING THE SPRING THAW. ANY DAAAGED DEVICES iBE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. TO INSURE THE ETECTTFNESS OF TIE EROSION CWFOL MEASURES, ALL POTENTIAL SNOW AND 1W1 ICE BLOCKAGES SMALL BE CLEARED. Q O �J xy g •\-1 RECEIVED �0 = U� �_ Je e `N 2 " 2009 a Deei9ned By: PB Checked Ely. PB 1 CRYVE So.. Budi11r1 ton Drown By, KB Scale: NONE Date: NOV 7, 2008 FOR DRB REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1,20,09 C 3.3 PROJECT #07202 SITE/EARTHWORK NOTES 1. PRIOR TO THE START O THE WORK A PRE-CONSIRUL710N MEETING WILL BE HELD WITH THE CONTAGION! OWNER, AND PROJECT ENGINEER M REVIEW AND IDENTIFY RESPONSIBURES. STATED OTHERINISE, ALL W 5 µD NERKID9 SHALL BE IN CUT BACK 12' MINIMUM N ARIAS UNDERMINED OR DISTURBED MINIMUM Y-O' WIDTH OR AS NOTED ON PLAN ACCORDANCE 'MINT MOST RECENT VERSION VERSION OF THE YYORK STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. CLFN6NG AND GRUBBING - ALL TOPSOIL AND UISUIIABLE MATERIALS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM IMPACTED AREVS. SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT. 1 1/2' BITUMINOUS WEARING OOUFSE, APPLY EMUI-qON ON AL FINAL GRADE 3. COYPACIDN SHALL BE PERFORMED USING VIBRATORY ROLLERS AND WATER N LIFTS OF NO GREATER THAN SIX INCHES. COPACHION TYPE N. VAOT 4OL03 SAWN AMID MLLED SURFACES. EDGE OF TRENCH SLOPE 2% _ DIRECTION BASED ON GMONG SHALL BE PERFORMED UNIT THE REQUIRED DENSITY IS ACHIEVED. DENSITY SHAWL BE DETTIMED BY AA9B0 T238 METHOD AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 95 PERCENT THE MAXIMUMDE NSITY FOR PAVED AREAS AND 90 PERCENT OFT MAXIMUM DENSITY FOR NON St °^AP 2 1/2' BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, C CONCRETE TYP. PAVED MESS ANED I ACCORDANCE TYPE II, VAOT 406.03 12' FINE MOO GRAVEL MATCH EXISTING WEARING COD MILL 1' YIN DEPTH. AND BINDER COHSE 6' AT DRIVEWAY CROSING 4. COMPACTION TESTING 9O L BE PERFORMED FOR EVERY LAYER OF MATERIAL PLACED MID FOR EVERY IODD SUN FEET OF AREA d U S 6' FINE CRUSHED GRAVEL 12' COARSE CRIISIFD GRAVfl 12' COARSE CRUSHED ALL REWNNG DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THERNFIT OF MAY SHALL BE FERTILIZED AND SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VERMONT GRAVEL STATE SPECIFICATIONS. STATE 12'lo COAT WITH EWLSDN MATCH EXISTING 6. THE SEEDING OF SLOPES AND DITCHES SHALL REWIRE THE OF EROSION CONTROL MATTING. WHEN BUTNG LP TO EXISTING PAVEMENT — — — CRUSTED GRAVELITIAL 7. COST O INITIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SHALL BE PAD BY T OWNER SIMSEOEAT IESING OF MATB8N5 NO PASSING IN SOD% SD&17A1I0N FABRIC T4;O{SS INSPECTION, SHALL BE PAD BY THECONTRACIOR. DR APPROVED EOINNENf. NN. UNOISIURED SOIL MATCH EXISDNC SW BARE MATERIALS SHALL BE 09TAINEDLOAM FROM APPROVED SOURCES. THEY SHALL CONSIST AT RIA SATISFACTORILY GRATED, FREE 8. ALL G MATERIAL. ORNNNG MA1EPoA, REASONABLY FREE FROM LOAN, Ai, CLAY AND ORGANIC MARINA. ENHWORK MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE THN:DNESS COMM SDDWLK NORDS: REQUIREMENTS O THE FOLLOWING TABLES PA4IOIF PAOMG TIDIES NOISIURBED SOIL OR A SAND BLANKET/BEDDING: SIEVE DE4OWTDN PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING SQUARE MESH SIEVES co 1. PUCE A TOOLED JOINT 1/8' WIDE AND AT LEAST 1/3 OF THE DEPTH. TYPICN0 AT INTERVALS MATCHING THE 1. IN ALL PAVEMENT AREAS TO BE PATCHED, SAW CO AND REMOVE D99NO PAVEMENT. COMPACTED FILL SIDEWALK WIDTH, OR AS MOLTED ON PLANS (NO RT EXCEED10'-0l. 2 INCHES 100 2. EXCAVATE BASE MATERIAL AND SUB -BASE MATERIAL IF NADEOW7E 3. COMPACT ALL FILL MATERIAL TO 95% OPIWM DENSITY. (95% MO 2. PLACE EXPANSION ,DIM AS INDICATED ON PLAS, NOT TO EXCEED 20-0' MAX. 11 NICHES 90 - LOO T -SILOXANE OR EQUAL BROOM FINISH WITH SMOOTH TROWELED EDGES TREAT WITH � Ito 7- 1 g EXISTING AS7ANDW EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE ROAM 4. -N-PLACE CONCRETE TO BE IOW CONCRETE 5%- DETRAINMENT WITH 6t6-W4.004.0 REINFORCING 60 10 No. 4 - 100 CENTERED IN 9CWAlK Na 100 0 - ID 5. WHERE SIDEWALK IS ADJACENT TO ENT RY/EIT DOOR PINS WITH FROST WALL FOUIOATIONS. SIDEWALK SIIAIL BE No. 20D 0 - 8 DOWELED RT PAD WITH 24' LONG /4 AWES (CENTERED) AT V-6' a (PORTION O DOWEL IN SIDEWALK TO BE GREASED). B. }' CRUSHED STONE SIEVE DESDNARON PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING SQUARE MESH SIEVES 6. WTEAE SIDEWALK S ADJACENT TO APB, MUM OR OTHER KARD FEATURE, INSTAL 1/2' EXPANSION MATERIAL (FULL I INCH 100 DEPTH OF SIDEWALK). BETWEEN FEATURE AND SIDEWALK floe 90 - 100 ASPHALT PAVEMENT TRENCH PATCH DETAIL LT p0 510 PAVEMENT DETAIL CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL NOB 0-5 ,, z SCALE NOT. ^ _ C. GRAVEL SUB -BASF: SIEVE DEMNATDN PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING SOMAS MESH SIM rc SINE NONE NONE N. 4 20 - 60 N. 100 0-12 No. 200 0 - 6 D. COARSE CRUSHED GRAVEL- SEW DESIGNATION PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING SQUARE MESH SIEVES 4 ACES 95 - Too No 4 25 - 50_ BI 2 4' LOAM, SEED. AND }' RADIUS TRENCH SURFACE WIDTH SHAM BE KEPT No. 100 0- 12 No. 200 0 - 6 ZN W Y.1 = 5�12 e 3 MULCH OR HARD SURFACE O SEE PUNS 6' WISH GRADE, REFER 10 AS OF AS PRACWX i E. FINE pA15Hm GRAVEL SIEVE DESIGNATION PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING SQUARE MESH SIEVE INCHES yG Z F A? � PAVEMENT DETAIL KOR.TH O OPEN TRENCH SHALL BE2 LENGTH PETER TO APPLICABLE DETAIL i01R IOPf TO A MINIMUM. PAVEMEIT AND PAVEMENT SUB -BASE i 5-0' 5' -0. S-0' 11 RICFS 90 - 100 w Z W � 5 4' LOAM,SEED h MULCH UNPAVED OVERFILL FOR SETTLEMENT RAMP ft 4 30 - 60 N. 100 0 - 12 Z W . $ FINED STOLES TO PROVIDE SHAPED No. 200 0 - 6COM.F F. GRANUNt BAC FU SIEVE DESIGNATION PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING SHAME MEAN SIEVES n a FROM PONE 3 NICHES 1CO D MAX LIFTS O 95 MAX. LIFTS TO 95% STANDARD OPTIMA UNDISTURBED EARN ADJACENT �YEETS FLUSH 'MIN IDJACENf No. 4 45 - 75 No. 0 - 12 CAST N PUCE HARD 4,000 PSI CONCRETE TRENCH DENSITY/ 200 No. 2W 0 - 6 GRAVEL SUBBASE flALlm SUITABLE NATIVE COMPACTED IN 12' RIFTS TO MATERIAL FREE BOX � OPIWWN COMM OMB G. TYPE 1 STONE FOR SLOE FRI T LONGEST DIMENSION O T STONE SHALL VARY FROM 1 NCI TO 12 INCHES, AND AT LEST FROM ORGANICS AND LARGE STONES BEGIN CURB TAPER 50 PERCENT OF T VLUME OFT STONE IN PLACE SHALL HAVE A LEAST DIMENSION O FOLK INCHES. U �„ c i•i .:•:.:.:.:.;;;.;: ARYL 12' '�•j:pi:9i;: BACNFNL;` SAND BLANKET MEETING REQUIREMENTS O AND TRANSITION VPMES / H. TYPE II SEINE FOR STONE FILL THE LONGEST DIMFNSKN O T STONE SHALL VARY FROM TWO INCHES TO 36 NCESS. AND ATSPRING Q LINE IYUNCNNG ENTERMORK SPECIFICATION ••• L LEAST 50 PERCENT O T VOLUME O THE SHOE IN PLACE SHALL HAVE A NEW DIMENSION w ¢ F a � �NME!k ' 1. CONSTRUCT CURBING N 10' SECTIONS WRH 1/8' JOINT BETWEEN SEOKKS 2. EXPANSION JOINTS AT 2O ON CETET, MAX. J. CONCRETE CURBS SHALL BE COS7RIICIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NYSDO SPECIFICATIONS, i BEDDING 6' '::••.........PPE BEWNG MD LWBNCIING 10 EE J/4' :: •••• ::: CRUSHED STONE MEETING REQUIREMENTS O •. /•. EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS O.D. IF UNSINGBLE MATERIAL 6 REMOVED. REPLACE WITH MATERIAL IEVEWED BY ENGINEER. RIM PAVEMENT TO BE CONCRETE CURB - }' REVFIl FLUSH WITH RAMP CURB $EE PAYE O 12 INCHES. I. TOPSOIL GENERA OWIFIGTIONS COIPOSH M USE AS A PLANING MEDIUM FORT PROJECT ONLY FERIE. FRWE, WELL -DINNED SDIL. O CO Q W U YmNG Q zi c z W '0'' 4. INSTAL 1/2' EXPANSION MATERIAL BETWEEN CURB AND ADJACENT NAM FEATURES (SIOEWAN, Lao DEf IL UNFOHM QUALITY. FREE O STONES OVER 1 IN. OAIETETI, STM OILS. CHEMICALS, PIASTER. CONCRETE, m BASE. ETC.). PESTS AND INFESTATIONS AND OTHER OBEIEROUS MATFAWS. SUBMIT SOIL ANALYSIS FOR IMPORT TOPSOIL m U r IMPORTED TOPSOIL FURNISH IMPORTED TOPSOIL FROM SOURCES ACCEPTED BY THE LANDSCAPE a .'C SECTION ANCMEO/ENGNEER (NTERVAF TOPSOIL RECOMMENDED) WIM31 VEER THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED UNDER U in 'GENERAL OWFDATOW ABOVE. CONCRETE CURB DETAIL TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAIL VERIFICATION: QIIANNTY O TOPSOIL TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHALL BE CALCULATED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND �\ INCLUDED IN THEIR BASE BID PRICE 2 6 NO TO SCALE NO TO SCALE NOT 10 SCALE ANALYSIS. OBTAIN AN A7FCULTHRAL SUBABLLTY ANALYSIS AND SOIL TDOUANOF THE ANALYSIS PROPOSED rT' W TOPSOIL FROM AN ACCREDITED SOUS LABORATORY AT CONNACTO(5 COST. ACCEPTANCE SUBMIT SOILS ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO T LANDSCAPE ARCHUCT/EIGNEER FOR ACCEPTANCE AMEND TOPSOIL PER ACCEPTED SOILS ANALYSIS RUM. O C)TOPSOIL SAMPLE THE LANDSCAPE ARCIITECTAINGNETR RESERVES RE RIGHT TO TAKE SAI ES OF THE IMPORTED O DELIVERED 70 THE SITE FOR CONFORMANCE TOT SPECFTGTIONS. REJECTED TOPSOIL IMMEDIATELY BEHOVE REJECTED TOPSOIL OF THE SITE AT CONIPACTW'S EXPENSE ZI W •�' o SfOCNPING: F STOCKPILING S REQUESTED. lACA1KIN5 AND AIOILIIS O SIOGTHES WILL BE DESIGNATED Q rc w BY LANDSCAPE AACHBECT/EICNFER. Ay.A o AAte�,, ✓' W QV c RECEIVED H V� U JAN 2 7 2009 = City of So. Burlington a Designed By: PB Checked By: PE, Drawn By: KB Scale: NONE Date: NOY 7, 2008 FOR ORB REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/20/09 C3.4 PROJECT #07202 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 MARCH 2O09 Page 3 6. Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-10 of Stella Chastenay Trust for a planned unit development to construct a 4-story building consisting of 7,800 sq. ft. of retail use and 24 residential dwelling units, 111-113 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Dinklage explained the purpose of a sketch plan. Mr. Behr then stepped down due to a potential conflict of interest. The applicant showed the location of the property at the end of Market Street at the corner of Hinesburg Road. It is within the City Center designation. The lot is 1.2 acres. The applicant proposes to build a 3-story building to contain a mix of office and retail on the first floor and residential on the upper floors. The entrance will be from Market Street. Waivers are being requested for height (42 feet from the proposed grade) and FAR (0.6). The City Center District allows these waivers if the applicant provides "public amenities." Fifty-nine parking spaces are being provided on site with additional street parking. This meets the requirement. Mr. Dinklage suggested the possibility of making the second floor into office space as well. The applicant indicated that is open for discussion. The applicant then showed the proposed lighting plan and the proposed landscaping plan. Landscaping will include plantings on Hinesburg Road. The plans show the setback from Hinesburg Road is 4 feet. The requirement is 5 feet, and the applicant indicated this could be met, if required. Proposed public amenities include benches and bike racks. Mr. Farley asked for an explanation of the "bio-retention area." The applicant explained that this is a "rain garden," a strip of grass with a planting area in the center. Mr. Dinklage said that the "biggie" for the Board will be the FAR request. This is clearly the easterly entrance to City Center and is a transition from an area of smaller single- family homes to a massive structure close to Hinesburg Rd. He suggested discussion about ways to mitigate the impact of that mass, including possibly changing the shape of the building. He noted that the City Center guidelines refer to a building such as this, and one option suggested is a Z-shaped structure with some open area near the corner. This would reduce the mass of building closer to the road and would provide for a large plaza area. Mr. Dinklage also suggested that the top floor might include some balcony/patio space to take advantage of mountain views to the east. There might also be a change in the fagade on Hinesburg Rd. to something more attractive. Members were favorable to these concepts. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 MARCH 2O09 Page 4 Mr. Knudsen asked if there is a conceptual vision for this corner. Ms. LaRose said there has been visioning for Market Street, but not specifically for this property. She explained the 3 types of bonuses available for providing public amenities. These include building height (up to 45 feet), floor area ratio (FAR), and location within the building envelope. Amenities might include plazas, pedestrian amenities, bus shelters, courtyards, streetscape, etc. Mr. Dinklage noted that the applicant is requesting a significant difference from what is required in terms of parking, with a lot of parking fronting on Market St. He felt that this, combined with the other waiver requests, should require something significant in the way of "public amenities." Ms. Parker, an Iby St. resident, noted that this height would be right behind her house and is very daunting. Ms. Germain, also of Iby St., said she had attended the "visioning" meeting and the talk was of a gradual change into the City Center, nothing this jarring. She said there is nothing like this anywhere nearby. She liked the "Z-shape" idea. A resident asked if this would be the same height as East Commons. Ms. LaRose said East Commons is 15 feet higher than this proposal. Mr. Dinklage encouraged the applicant to meet with neighbors before the next hearing on this proposal. Mr. Carpentier of Iby St. asked if there will be a sidewalk on the Market St. side. The applicant confirmed that there will. Mr. Dinklage said there is a master plan for streetscape of Market St., and this plan will have to be consistent with that. Mr. Carpentier asked how snow will be dealt with. The applicant said it would be taken away. Mr. Dinklage said that issue would be part of the discussion at the next level of hearing. Mr. Carpentier asked if there is a plan for a bus on Market St. Mr. Dinklage said there could be in the future when City Center builds to its proposed density. City Center plans require the "bump outs" and bus stops. He also noted that the Market St. concept includes on -street parking. Mr. Carpentier said he finds the building height out of character with the neighborhood. He understood that City Center design will change things over a period of many years, but he still questioned a building of this size so close to the road. He also asked how fire trucks would service the top floors. Mr. Dinklage said that, too, will be addressed at the next level of application. Mr. Carpentier asked if the "rain garden" would be adequate for all the runoff from this big a building. The applicant said it has been sized for the area. Mr. Dinklage said that will be very important because storm sewers on Williston Rd. would get overloaded. The Board will have expert advice on this. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 MARCH 2O09 Page 5 Mr. Carpentier said he liked the "Z" building idea with a plaza in front. He suggested underground parking. The applicant said they would have to go too deep for that. Ms. Moore asked if these would be condos or rentals. The applicant said they would be rentals. Mr. Dinklage said the Board has no control over that, and apartments could become condos in the future. Ms. Moore said she agrees with moving the building back. Ms. Bell felt the mass of building is daunting 75-feet from her door. She felt staff did a good job of noting the things that are important to the neighbors, and she thought the applicant should reconsider this building within the neighborhood. She also noted that structured parking is possible at grade and that would create a better look at the Market St. entrance. Mr. Dinklage then asked Board members what they felt were "show stoppers." Mr. Knudsen said he was uncomfortable with granting all three waivers for this one building. Mr. Plumeau felt the Board has to give as much guidance as possible as to what it wants in the way of public amenities. Mr. Dinklage said he wants the mass of building facing Hinesburg Rd. to be reduced. He likes the idea of a courtyard on the corner and asked the applicant to work with staff to come up with a creative design. He also wanted more building on Market St. and less parking there. He stressed that something will be built on this corner and it needs to be as "friendly" as possible. Ms. Johnson of Barrett St. said City Center will happen, but she would like to see something more transitional. Mr. Conner noted that the City Council will be discussing the location of Market St. at its 16 March meeting. He added that this has no relation to the project being discussed. A resident noted a building at the foot of Cherry St. in Burlington which appears to be more than 1 building because of different facades. He felt that approach might make this building look less like a monolith. Mr. Dinklage suggested a second sketch plan hearing. Mr. Farley moved to continue Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-10 of Stella Chastenay Trust until 21 April 2009. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-06 of Marine Collection to subdivide a 4.87 acre parcel developed with a boat and recreational vehicle sales and service facility into two lots, 3017 Williston Rd: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD \drb\sub\chastenaysketchplan.doc DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: February 27, 2009 Plans received: January 27, 2009 111-113 HINESBURG ROAD SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-09-10 Agenda #6 Meeting Date: March 3, 2009 Owner/Applicant Stella Chastenay Trust 97 Hinesburg Road S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer/Contact Property Information Paul Boisvert, PE Tax Parcel 0860-00111; 0860-00113 Engineering ventures Inc CD 3 Zoning District 208 Flynn Ave, Suite 21 1.28 Acres (combined lots) Burlington, VT 05401 Location Map K Stella Chastenay Trust, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking sketch plan review for a planned unit development to construct a 4-story building consisting of 7,800 sq. ft. of retail use and 24 residential dwelling units, 111-113 Hinesburg Road. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on January 27, 2009 and have the following comments: ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Requirements CD 3 Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size none 1.28 acres Max. Building Coverage 40% 17% Max. Overall Coverage 90% 70% Front Setback 5 ft. 0 ft. Side Setback 5 ft. 82 ft. Rear Setback NA NA Front Yard Coverage 30% 41.3% ♦ Max. Building Height 45 ft. 42. ft. zoning compliance NA corner property; no rear setbacks A zoning non-compliance PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (a) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. 1. The South Burlington Water Department shall review and comment on the plans, prior to preliminary plat approval. 2. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning prior to submittal of the final plat application. Q (b) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The applicant has submitted an erosion and sediment control plan. The City of South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent has not yet reviewed the plans. He will review future set of plans and provide comments prior to preliminary plat approval. 3_ The City of South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent shall review the plans and provide comments prior to preliminary plat approval. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the Stormwater Superintendent and, where necessary, the plans shall be revised. 4. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. (c) The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The project is proposed to be accessed via a 24 foot wide access drive off of the northern side of Market Street. Market Street is currently an unimproved public road. Furthermore, Market Street is the principal road within the Central District and subsequent City Center planning. It is currently the subject of discussions related to the redesign of the roadway network, and a proposal exists to shift at least a portion of it (that which is closest to this property) to the south by approximately 50 feet. The City Council has jurisdiction over this matter, and will hopefully resume discussions and potentially render a decision within the next few months. Until that time, staff asks the Development Review Board and the applicant to remain patient with respect to further discussion of this criterion. The location of the road is paramount to the design of the site, as well as discussions of access, circulation, and traffic management. Furthermore, after determining the final location of the road, staff needs to work with the applicant and the Board towards a roadway improvement plan. Market Street is unimproved; to add any additional vehicle trip ends to it without improvements would be unwise and unsafe. The extent, structure, and cost -sharing analysis of those improvements will be discussed after the location of the road is finalized. Finally, regardless of the roadway alignment, the addition of vehicle trip ends to Market Street/Hinesburg Road intersection should be carefully monitored. Staff recommends an intersection analysis which would include a signal warrant analysis, as well as examine the site lines which could be impacted by a solid building potentially so close to the road. 5. The applicant shall continue to work with the City with respect to the alignment of Market Street, and infrastructure improvements to Market Street. 6. The applicant should complete a traffic and intersection analysis. C! (d) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. There do not appear to be any wetlands on the subject lots. (e) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The stated purpose of the Central District is: to encourage the location of a balanced and coordinated mixture of residential, commercial, public and private uses adjacent to Dorset Street that support the city center goals and objectives contained in the Comprehensive Plan. It is designed to promote efficient use of land by concentrating mixed uses within a well-defined Central District. This will provide a pedestrian -oriented circulation network that minimizes vehicular traffic_ It also encourages the traditional town center pattern of appropriately scaled buildings facing onto a well-defined and active public street. Innovative site planning and master planning are encouraged to maximize uses, shared parking, public open space and pedestrian amenities which create an aesthetically pleasing and socially active community center on and around Dorset Street The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that the Central District should: Promote through the zoning and subdivision regulations an appropriate level of density (coverage and building heights) to provide a "critical mass" of activity. A critical point here is that this project is located just on the border of the Central District, located across from a portion of the Residential 4 District. The subject lot is surrounded on three sides by one to two-story single family homes. A four story building set only five feet from the property line is rather daunting. Staff recommends that the applicant work with staff to create a site plan which would provide a smoother transition between the districts. This could include a stepped approach with the portion of the building closest to the roads being lower, rising as you recede within the building envelope. Perhaps this could include an `L' shaped building which provides a courtyard/plaza to the front of the building, set on the corner. 7. The applicant should work to create a building which would be more visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the abutting residential district. (t) Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (g) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. 8. The South Burlington Fire Chief should review the plans, prior to preliminary plat approval. (h) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The City Engineer has reviewed the sketch plan and provided initial comments in a memo dated February 26, 2009 (attached). He shall continue to review future sets of plans, especially as road improvements are detailed for Market Street. 9. The City Enginneer and the Director of Public Works shall review future sets of plans and provide comments with respect to the roadway improvements proposed for Market Street. (i) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Again, the City Engineer shall review future sets of plans 10 Exterior lighting must comply with Section 13.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 11. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines shall be underground. 6f) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff believes that the proposed use is consistent with the overall goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the district in which it is located (Central District 3). However, as noted, there are some site plan refinements that should be made. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications. - (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The proposed project seems to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The project also provides for safe pedestrian access on the site. Pedestrian t � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINUTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\chastenav\sketchplan.doc access to the site and within the right of way will be discussed below in the context of Central District zone -specific regulations. Section 13.01 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations indicates that the proposed 7,800 square feet of retail will require 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of GLA (the applicant erroneously used 3.5 spaces per 1000), and 2.25 spaces per residential unit. Therefore, the required parking for the proposed project would be 93 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing 69 parking spaces on site. The applicant is also proposing 5 parking spaces on the street. As staff has previously discussed, the street details should be finalized before any spaces are guaranteed on site. The applicant should re -run their shared parking analysis using the correct required numbers. 12. The applicant should revise their shared parking analysis. The plans depict a bicycle rack. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Many of the parking spaces proposed to serve this project are located within the building envelope prescribed by the Central District regulations. They are also within the front setback. The current plan is in strict conflict with these regulations and should be revised. 13. The plans shall be revised to relocate the parking to adhere to the regulations for the Central District and to be to the rear or side of the building. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. Staff has discussed this issue. The height of the building is within the allowable limitations for the district. However, it should be considered with respect to the proximity to the roads and the abutting residential properties. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Staff has already noted that new utility lines must be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has submitted a visual simulation of the proposed buildings and Staff feels the above -mentioned criteria have been met. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\chastenav\sketchplan.doc (� Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Again, the applicant has submitted a visual simulation of the proposed buildings and Staff feels the above -mentioned criteria have been met. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. - (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. There is sufficient access and internal circulation throughout the plan as it currently exists. However, staff anticipates changes to the design with respect to other comments in this report; those changes may warrant additional review of these criteria. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Staff has already indicated that new utility lines must be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). No dumpsters are shown on site. 14. All trash and recycling facilities should be shown on site. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements. 15. The applicant should submit, with the preliminary plat application, a landscape plan and landscape budget in compliance with Section 13.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Central District Requirements 8.04 Dimensional Requirements in All Districts A. Purpose. The general intent of the building setbacks in the Central District is to require all buildings to front on to public streets and to require that parking facilities are located in the center of the blocks to the greatest extent practicable, occupy only minimal frontage on public streets, and are thoroughly screened from view from public streets and rights -of -way. l CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\chastenay\sketchplan.doc The allowable building and parking envelope is as similarly shown: Figure 8-3, Allowable Building Envelope (Tj13ical). CD Central Distr c:t 3 DORSE I STREET r, vr,1, rrr rr.7 ' 1/ BUILDING ENVELOP C r i•9TrN ti)R t'i_nc �� 0o/'�m� 7 S,.Vft t ilk .,... _3 The parking proposed for this development is not in conformance with this criterion. The majority of the parking fronts on Market Street. As stated above, the plans should be revised to better address this criterion. B. Location of buildings and structures. (1) All buildings and structures, with the exception of parking facilities, are required to be constructed within an allowable building envelope. The maximum depth of allowable building envelopes shall be eighty (80) feet and, in general, shall be measured from the nearest planned public street right-of-way as shown on the South Burlington Official Map. (2) The Development Review Board may approve a building, a portion of which extends beyond the building envelope provided the building contains a minimum of two (2) stories and the overall site design of the property is found to be in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Central District. The proposed building is entirely within the allowable building envelope at this time. 8.05 Specific Sub -District Regulations Density in Central District 3 and 4: The base maximum density of development shall not exceed an F.A.R. of 0.5. The Development Review Board may explicitly approve development up to an F.A.R. of 0.7 as a bonus for the provision of special, public -oriented amenities such as parks, courtyards, pedestrian ways, etc. The maximum residential density shall be twenty-five (25) units per acre (minimum unit size of five hundred (500) square feet). The effective FAR of the proposed site is 0.64. This exceeds the base allowable on the site, but is within the upper limitations of the FAR. As such, the applicant may only receive this bonus for the provision of special, public -oriented amenities. Staff finds the proposal severely lacking in this aspect. We have spoken with the applicant who is generally amenable to considering additional amenities. Those have not yet been shown on the plans. Pursuant to previous discussions on the bulk of the building near the roadway, a plaza may be an appropriate solution here. The Board should discuses this at the hearing. i CITY OF SOUTH BURLINb I -ON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\chastenay\sketchplan.doc 15. The Board shall discuss the use of public amenities on the site. The applicant shall adhere to the recommendations of the Board. (4) Height in Central District 3 and 4: (a) Except as provided above, no point of any pitched roof structure shall rise more than forty- five (45) feet, and no point of any other structure (e.g., flat roofed structure) shall rise more than thirty-five (35) feet, above the average post -construction grade adjoining such structure. (b) A height of up to fifty-five (55) feet for a pitched roof structure, and up to forty-five (45) feet for any other structure, may be permitted by the Development Review Board as a bonus for the provision of additional public space (parks, courtyards, etc.), or other public amenities. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" Section of this report to the satisfaction of Staff prior to submittal of a preliminary plat application. A continuance of the sketch plan is likely necessary before moving on. Respectfully submitted, r LCathyan LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Paul Boisvert, engineer for applicant William & Kimberly Rockwood 118 Hinesburg Rd. South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-863-5902 February 14, 2009 Ms Cathyann LaRose South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Application for Development for 111-113 Hinesburg Rd. by Stella Chastenay Trust Dear Ms. LaRose, As we are unable to attend the Development Review Board meeting, we are writing this letter to express our concerns on the above referenced proposal, as well as to protect our rights to appeal, should that become necessary. While welcoming qualitative development of this area, and recognizing that this type of expansion adds to the vitality of our city, we must also ask the City to protect the flavor and essence of the residential aspect of this neighborhood. When City Center plans were introduced, we envisioned a great mix of residential and commercial ventures with enough greenspace buffers to blend well with the existing neighborhood. While recognizing that this is not a City proposal, but one being offered by a neighbor for development, we would hope that a better profile for this project could be attained that would be more in keeping with the visual aspects of the existing, surrounding neighborhood. A four-story building, no matter how beautiful, is still an imposing structure when situated right on the sidewalk of Hinesburg Road, a heretofore unprecedented structural placement. We who will be living, quite literally, in the shadow of this building believe that better placement of the structure could be achieved to present a more graceful integration with, as well as preserving the privacy of, the surrounding residential neighborhood. We hope that the Development Review Board, as well as members of your department, give these considerations their full attention. Most sin/ce-1rely, ,),,,,, William Rockwood Kimberly Rockwood Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- 0 - 05 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): S i� !lam Ch�s�er�� y f�rvld 97 /!;nc_fbvYj 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): u y� �1. /0. -7a18 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): ,71c-11a Tr✓!t ; 9 7 /Y;rx rbv" 2oa 4 . S6uf1. Lei✓ /'►�efio►� t/T OSS+o; 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #). PAul 6c15VFPT PE _ EA1CTINEEk1AJ6r VENTURES (,IK.I 1 a. Contact e-mail address: DQul k L� enQlnee6nOVer1- uRe 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ( 113 f-} yESBuwx RCAD 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0&pQ --CC[ I F 0860—OO113 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you w nt approval for): ;o_rlrn�lnnrnnrrin4. Pvk+Yr,n IA -I 1.7 1 r Site Plan Application b. Existing.Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Fxic�`hnn In-1' c(Tn+ninc (k Sinnle- fnmily (iiipHiM nnA ar'Q,�c c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): - d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildingsrand existing buildings to remain): Ul = {I- IRGO STc3} -'I- 0C SE UA e. Height of building & number of floors ( roposed b ildings and existing buildings to remai , s ecify if baseme t and mezzanine): ui f. N rnber of residential lunit�4if applicable, new units "1 L•1 U - g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existi office employees): NO cy iSh na emnlmes . sting units tq remaip): s non- h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specificall requ sted above, plepse note f Ovelrlay Distfcts Eire applicable): M. TRQ C, �� q� 41- 14 S" fR MV -k � ftkS U"� R6ad -TnaP'kQ-+ Is-tRkD-+ IroseE 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: S-S` $ o a Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 1. °I % / 1 r C) sq. ft. Proposed 1 7 % / 9 32.2 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 3. 7 % l � o V 9 _ .sq. ft. Proposed._ 70% / — 3 913 a sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % sq. ft. 2 Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 3 oo,,zo b. Landscaping: $_ Q c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): I �a,./<,,,.� S 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): G' I C-) N P D b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out):_ _ 6 R c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 3 PM -- 8 PM 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Cl'lOt�11JA�--TAIDAN] 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 1.0 b 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 4�4,�H E6 Site Plan Application 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 4 Site Plan Aoolication ' hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line PRINT NAM DATE OF SUBMISSION: I REVIEW AUTHORITY: VDevelopment Review Board I Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete/. of Plan 0 ❑ Incomplete & Zoning or Designee 5 Date Chastenay Mixed -Use Building -- Adjoining Property Owners PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 97 HINESBURG RD EDMOND CHASTENAY FAMILY TRUST C/O JOSEPH CHASTENAY 97 HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 100 HINESBURG RD DO QUYEN V 100 HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 106 HINESBURG RD DO TRAN H & QUYEN 106 HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 118 HINESBURG RD ROCKWOOD WILLIAM 118 HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 126 HINESBURG RD POULIN CHARLES L & DONNA A 126 HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 132 HINESBURG RD BELL MANAGEMENT LLC P.O. BOX 1444 WILLISTON, VT 05495 135 HINESBURG RD PETERS MICHAEL A 9253 NW 9T" PLACE PLANTATION, FL 33324 0 MARKET ST RANDALL G. MUNSON c/o S. BURLINGTON REALTY CO. P.O. BOX 2204 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05407 9 Di I I DI ' 1 N K33 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A January 26, 2009 r • Burlington, VT 05401 tel. 802.863.6225 fax 802. 863.6306 Ray Belair, Administrative Officer South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Chastenay Mixed -Use Building, 111 Hinesburg Road Dear Ray: Enclosed is an application for site plan review, submitted on behalf of the Chastenay family, for a mixed use building proposed at the corner of Market Street and Hinesburg Road. The proposed building will include +7,800 sf of retail space on the first floor, and an additional 3 floors containing a total of 24 residential units. Overall, the building will include approximately 36,000 sf of gross floor area. City Center streetscape and planning have been incorporated into the building and site design. The building has been set close to the road, for a pedestrian friendly layout. Covered walkways have been incorporated into the building design along the south and east elevations. Tree and hardscape features from the City Center Streetscape Design Guidelines Handbook have been incorporated along Market Street. We are requesting application of the public amenity density and height bonuses that are allowed under section 8.05C of the zoning regulations. In support of this request, we have included covered bike storage, benches, covered walkways, a bus shelter, and other features to enhance the public's ability to utilize the project site. When we met with Paul Connor and Cathyann LaRose on January 7ffi, you indicated that the City was considering adjusting the alignment of Market Street. At this point, we would like to present our designs to the Development Review Board, and are submitting this package with the intent of having this project scheduled for review. We are happy to discuss alternatives with the DRB, as well as any suggestions that may come from staff. /-�- --7 f7> Paul Boisvert, P.E. Project Manager Encl: Application for Site Plan Review Check in the amount of $186.00 Adjoiner list and diagram Shared Parking Calculations Vehicle Traffic Estimates Lighting Information Plan sheets C1.0 through C3.4 (5 full size and 1 11x17) Color building elevations, 5 sets (11x17) Residential floor plan, 5 copies (18x24) 78in °0020 002; CHASTENAY MIXED —USE BUILDING °° �� �� o1250 0 p ADJOINING PROPERTY DIAGRAM -Ni's0470 po 19 000717 00011 0 � R 1810 na L 01241 ' e C E 01302 \_ ,b000470 . C t 1a 10 �.. 181U n, Wl(U$TON R� 01Cu 0470 a 01310 0 04 ! '� a e ; ,/`•f� r A R z ; 01251 Q C C / ! U C3140 0188 160 4� 181 6 0181at06 HO i RR3 181U � 1Z'1 013155 - a to C CC- a ..„�„ 1810 nI _ _ %a 01 65 _ 00060 C 000826 183, - C 11 0 R7j810 1810 0 , R '011.185 12$35 O R 99 0820 00009 n R 00042 W O11 w 4R46 gi001%00R ��14 i Q 0860 $ G N_ 0820 RoR50 oe2a O 18 i 0860 00019 00 55 a Ry 00 22 �• i/ n* 00021 0820 %! !. 0 0057 x 00060 a 147.p 00024 4 i• /% R R 10001000 4 R8 OR 00820 s 0�25 0820 00028 4� OOR 61 00070 $ 00032~_ i oaso a of RUTH STREET OOR71 - 1470 I4 - 0OR15 I % • �, /01 03 �005 '00007 000 1 R 1 V 0860 R 00075 00 BO r. f�' 05 003y „0510s OS 10 00090 R ! } 0860 a b, 00082 100096 R I 00084 R — R # ! oc Do Quyen / 0010005 a R 0510 00075 R 00I Rockwood 0860 3� ..-.---- 0860 00111 = 0510 1 �• ! R 00418 OOH70 a 05107 4aQ�' R � n i oo„° Poulin .' Munson R 0966 o..R.... - A 0 Bell 0032 Managment u MARKET STREET � A 0860 a F- -'^ 00 35 00138 W W Munson R aso a Peters o a = Munson �' M 001390Nit 0910 Oslo 00002 00145 � 0910 00006 00000 R Tp - 0a10 f)!110 000112 OQ 10 00008 R R Rp R — : 0910 +oo�fa R STREET 0910 0U ,� 26 0.0026\000%'24 HAP 19 F:Tt ASYURP09S8 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 211 "DON. LRG 9°a. CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7r "DON. Nor race. Irma. Chastenay Mixed Use Building Vehicle Traffic Estimates OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. I Size VPD General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 13 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 21 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 12 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 22 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 87 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 249 RETAIL/ RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate I Trip Ends vs. I Size I VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 11000sq.ft.GFA 7,838 54 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 62 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 22 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 32 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 348 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 510 Engineering Ventures, 1/20/09 October 31, 2008 Mr. Paul Boisvert, P.E. Engineering Ventures, Inc. 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A Burlington, VT 05401 Subject: Chastenay Site Lighting Plan Dear Paul; Site lighting for the Chastenay proposed development consists of pole mounted cut-off luminaires and recessed lighting fixtures in the covered walkway around two sides of the building. The pole mounted luminaires are selected to project lighting effectively over a broad area while restricting light output to less than 1 % above the horizontal plane. Energy efficient 150w metal halide pulse start technology is utilized for the pole mounted luminaires. Attached is a site lighting plan layout for the proposed retail and residential building site on Market Street in South Burlington, VT. I have calculated the following lighting metrics based on a 10' x 10' grade level illuminance grid. Parking Lot/Sidewalk Statistical Area: 0.95 fc average 0.2 fc minimum (with outlying points not in critical pedestrian/vehicular interaction areas at 0.1 fc) 4.3 fc maximum 21.5 Max/Min ratio (20 or less is recommended) Maintained illuminance levels are well below South Burlington's maximum average illuminance of 3.0 fc. with maximum pole height of 18'. The maximum to minimum illuminance ratio is very close to the IESNA recommended level, even with lower than typical luminaire pole -mounting heights. Most of the light pole heights are at 16', with the slightly higher 18' poles required in the rear of the building to cover the full width of a double loaded parking area. All fixtures meet glare restrictions by being full cut-off type, meaning they restrict light output to less than I % above the horizontal plane. Light trespass at all interior property lines is at 0.0 fc as shown on the photometric plan. Illuminance at street curb -cut entry to the site and adjacent to the street front building location is 0.7 fc maximum, and 0.2 fc or less more typical where the building abuts the public right-of-way on Market Street. This will combine with city -owned streetlights along Market Street to provide additional lighting within the public right-of-way. IESNA Guidelines for parking lot lighting include a minimum horizontal illuminance recommendation of 0.2 footcandles and a Maximum/Minimum ratio not -to -exceed 20:1. By limiting the maximum light pole height to achieve a more pedestrian scale, this site plan does not strictly conform to those guidelines. However, all of the points that are less than 0.2 fc are at perimeter parking lot areas where there is minimal danger of pedestrian/vehicular conflict. The proposed building features a covered walkway around the Market Street and east side of the building, which is lighted with recessed 26w compact fluorescent fixtures. These produce a maximum illuminance at grade level of 5 fc, and are not directly visible, due to the fixture recess depth, from outside the walkway canopy. ■ Metal halide lamping is used for pole mounted site lighting due to reliable starting in very cold temperatures. Compact fluorescent hardwired fixtures are used for walkway lighting. These will start reliably in cold temperatures when recessed into the walkway ceiling. The depth of these fixtures must be accounted for in architectural and thermal envelope detailing. This design meets South Burlington lighting requirements as well as the design intent of Act 250, Section 9f for energy efficiency and protection of the night sky from unwanted glare. It also meets LEED Site Lighting Criteria 8 for light pollution reduction. If you have any questions regarding the design or specifications, please contact me at 802-862-1901. Thank you, Donna J. Leban, AIA, LC Light/Space/Design 7 Iris Lane, S. Burlington, VT 05403 lightspd@comcast.net Project: Chastenay Site Development, South Burlington, VT Lighting Fixture Schedule Tye Manufacturer Catalog Number Mounting M1 Single Arm Mount, Lamp Ballast TLM150-3 McGraw- Talon TLM-150MP-3F- 150w pulse start MH Pulse start MH Edison, or FG with PT optional Round straight aluminum MHC150/U/M/4K/Alto ballast Equal by power tray; Gardco Small pole RSA5M16N Gardco or Gullwing G13; or Kim Kim Lighting Small Archetype- SAR TLM150-4 McGraw- Talon TLM-150MP-4F- M1 Straight Arm Mount, 150w pulse start MH Pulse start MH Edison, or FG with PT optional Round straight aluminum MHC150/U/M/4K/Alto ballast equal by power tray; Gardco Small pole RSA5M18N Gardco or Gullwing G13; or Kim Kim Lighting Small Archet a-SAR TLM150-5 McGraw- Talon TLM-150MP-5F- M1 Single Arm Mount, 150w pulse start MH Pulse start MH Edison, or FG with PT optional Round straight aluminum MHC150/U/M/4K/Alto ballast equal by power tray, Gardco Small pole RSA5M16N Gardco or Gullwing G13; or Kim Kim Lighting Small Archetr a-SAR RC26W Cooper C8042E-8081 -L1 -WF; or Recessed in Canopy 26w PL-T Electronic Portfolio, or Prescolite LF6CFV ceiling 26w/841/4P/Alto Prescolite DESCRIPTION The McGraw -Edison Talon is the most versatile, functionally designed, universally adaptable outdoor luminaire available. The Talon brings outstanding performance to walkways, parking lots, roadways, building areas, and any security lighting application. U.L. listed and CSA certified for wet locations. IP65 Rated. SPECIFICATION FEATURES Construction One-piece heavy -wall, die-cast aluminum construction with integral reveal channels along top surface of housing. Internal cast -in wall separates optical and electrical chambers allowing components to operate cooler. One-piece die-cast aluminum door frame with integral cast -in gasket channel seals optical chamber to an IP65 rating. Stainless steel latches and hinges allow for toolless opening and removal of door frame. Reflector Choice of 14 high efficiency optical systems utilizing horizontal and vertical lamp orientations. Optional high efficiency segmented optical systems constructed of premium 95 % reflective anodized aluminum sheet. Optical segments are rigidly mounted inside a thick gauge aluminum housing for superior protection. All segment faces are clean of rivet heads, tabs or other means of attachment which may cause streaking in the light distribution. DIMENSIONS 16 1 /4" [41 DRILLING PATTERNS TYPE "M" 6., 1203m m I 11 7/8" 1302mml 1 3/4" 145mm1 2 5/16" [59mm) 3/4" [20mm] is hole G IX 2 7/16" [124mm] 4 7/8" [124mml (2) 5/8" 116mml dia. holes Standard with mogul -base socket for HPS and 175-40OW MH. Standard with medium -base socket for 150W MH and below. All optical modules feature quick disconnect wiring plugs and are field rotatable in 90' increments. Electrical Offered standard with ballast and related electrical componentry hard mounted to die-cast housing details for optimal heat transfer and operating efficiency. Optional galvanized steel swing -down power tray with integral handle. Electrical disconnects allow tray to be completely removed from the housing providing ample hand and tool room for attachment of fixture during installation. McGRAW-EDISONO Catalog # Project Comments 11, repared by _ Mounting Extruded 8" aluminum arm includes internal bolt guides allowing for easy positioning of fixture during installation to pole or wall surface. Standard single carton packaging of housing, square pole arm and round pole adapter for contractor friendly arrival of product on site. Finish Housing and arm finished in a 5 stage premium TGIC polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness for superior protection against fade and wear. Standard colors include black, bronze, grey, white, dark platinum, and graphite metallic. RAL and custom color matches available. Consult the McGraw -Edison Architectural Colors brochure for the complete selection. LAMP TYPE WATTAGE Metal Halide 175, 250, 400W High Pressure Sodium 70, 100, 150, 250, 400W Pulse Start Metal Halide 70,100, 150, 200, 250, 320, 350, 400W FCO COMPLIANT Full Cutoff In all flat glass configurations. 23 1/4" (590mm1181, WALL MOUNT 12" ---- I [305mml 4 7/8" 1124mm] —� 10 1/2" 1267mml 6112" 1 _-9/16" 114mmj 165 8" J mm]J I Dia. Hole (4) 1203mm1 TLM TALON MEDIUM 70 - 40OW High Pressure Sodium Pulse Start Metal Halide Metal Halide ARCHITECTURAL AREA LUMINAIRE ENERGY DATA Hi -Reactance Ballast Input Watts 70W HPS HPF (95 Watts) 100W HPS HPF (130 Watts) 150W HPS HPF (190 Watts) 15OW MH HPF (185 Watts) CWI Ballast Input Watts 250W HIPS HPF (300 Watts) CWA Ballast Input Watts 175W MH HPF (210 Watts) 20OW MP HPF (240 Watts) 25OW MH HPF (295 Watts) 320W MP HPF (365 Watts) 40OW MP HPF (448 Watts) 40OW MH HPF (455 Watts) 40OW HPS HPF (465 Watts) EPA Effective Projected Area: (Sq. Ft.) Recessed Door w/o Arm: 0.79 Deep Door w/o Arm: 1.02 8" Arm: 0.43 SHIPPING DATA Approximate Net Weight: Recessed Door 47 lbs. (21.79 kgs.) Deep Door 52 lbs. 123.63 kgs.)� rtiyf� RT COOPER Lighting www.wopedighting.com Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. ADH080480 09/18/2008 10:29:15 AM PHOTOMETRICS [Complete IES files available at www.cooperlighting.com] 0 1 2 3 4 TLM-175-MH-3V-FG 175-Watt MH 14,000-Lumen Clear Lamp Type III Vertical Flat Glass -mail '-_■■ E1111.■ r�I11�■ �N■■■ 5 0 1 2 3 4 TLM-175-MH-AS-FG 175-Watt MH 14,000-Lumen Clear Lamp Area Square Flat Glass 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 TLM-250-MH-SL-FG 250-Watt MH 20,500-Lumen Clear Lamp Spill Light Eliminator Flat Glass 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 TLM-400-MH-3V SG TLM-400-MH-4V-SG TLM-400-MH-5S-FG 400-Watt MH 400-Watt MH 400-Watt MH 36,000-Lumen Clear Lamp 36,000-Lumen Clear Lamp 36,000-Lumen Clear Lamp Type III Vertical Type IV Automotive Perimeter Type V Segmented Sag Glass Sag Glass Flat Glass ORDERING INFORMATION 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 TLM-400-MH-3S-FG 400-Watt MH 36,000-Lumen Clear Lamp Type III Segmented Flat Glass 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 TLM-400-MH-AR-SG 400-Watt MH 36,000-Lumen Clear Lamp Area Round Sag Glass 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 TLM TALON MEDIUM Footcandle Table Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height. Mounting Footcandle Values for Height Isofootcandle Lines A B C D E 175W [3V/ASl 15' 1.70 0.85 0.34 0.17 20' _ _ 1.00 0.50 0.20 0.10 25' 0.64 0.32 0.13 0.06 - 25OW [SL]/40OW [3S] 20' _ 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.20 0.10 25' - 1.28 0.64 0.32 0.13 0.06 30' 0.88 0.44 0.22 0.09 0.04 4 Footcandle Table Select mounting height and read across for 3 footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height. 2 Mounting Footcandle Values for 1 Height Isofootcandle Lines A B C D E 0 40OW [3V/4V/5S/AR] 1 20' 3.00 1.50 0.75 0.30 0.15 25' 1.00 0.50 0.20 0.10 _ _200 _ 2 30' - 1.38 0.69 0.34 0.13 0.06 5 3 4 Sample Number: TLM-4MMH-Mr-3F-FG-BK-HS Product Family ' Distribution Colors Options +a Accessories is TLM= Talon Site Medium Horizontal lame AP: Grey F= Single Fuse (120, 277 or" MA1010.XX= Single Tenon Adapter for 312" O.D. Tenon 2F= Type II Formed BZ- Bronze 347V) MA1011-XX- 2@180` Tenon Adapter for 31/2" O.D. Tenon Lamp Wattage ' 2S- Type II Segmented BK= Black FF= Double Fuse (208, 240 or" MA1012-XX- 3@120' Tenon Adapter for 312" O.D. Tenon 70= 70W 3F= Type III Formed WH=White 480V) MA1013-XX= 4@90° Tenon Adapter for 31/2" O.D. Tenon 100' 100W 3S= Type III Segmented pp= Dark Platinum P= Button Type Photocontrol 1+ (120, 208, 240 or 277V) MA1014.XX= 2@900 Tenon Adapter for 31/2" O.D. Tenon 16o= 150W 41F= Type IV Formed GM- Graphite Metallic EM=Quartz Restrike w/Delay +z MA101 a-XX- 2@120" Tenon Adapter for 3 W" O.D. Tenon 175- 175W 4S= Type IV Segmented (Also Strikes at Cold Start) MAtote-XX= 3@90° Tenon Adapter for 312" O.D. Tenon 200= 20OWs• 4 5F= Type V Formed o= Quartz Restrike+z MA1017-XX= Single Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8" O.D. Tenon 250=25OW as: Type VSegmented EM/SC:Quartz Emergency +z MA1018XX-2@1800Tenon Adapter for 23/8"O.D.Tenon 320=32OW3.4 SL= Spill Light Eliminator Separate Circuit MA1019-XX=3@120°Tenon Adaptor tor23/8"O.D.Tenon 350= 35OW3. 4 AF= Automotive Front PT- Electrical Power Tray MA1040.XX= 4@90" Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8" O.D. Tenon 400z 400W4 Row R= NEMA Twistlock Photocontrol MA1098-XX- 2@900 Tenon Adapter for 2318" O.D. Tenon Vertical Lamp Receptacle MA1049-XX- 3@90° Tenon Adapter for 2 318" O.D. Tenon Lamp Type 3V=Type III Verticals HS= internal House -side Shield13 OAINA1ote= NEMA Photomnbol (105-285v) MH: Metal Halide 4V=Type IV Automotives VS= POlycarbonate Vandal Shield OA/RA1027= NEMA Photocontrd (4801A MP= Pulse Start Metal Halide Perimeter DD= Deep Door OAMA1201= NEMA Photoconaol (347V) HPS= High Pressure Sodium AR- Area Rounds WM= Wall Mount with 8 Inch Arm oAoaA1o1E= Shorting Cap .AS- Area Squares DM- Direct Mount for Round or XMA1213-X- External House -side Shield Kit [EPA= 0.381 Voltage a Square Pole 120= 120V Lens Type DW- Direct Wall Mount 208- 208V FG= Flat Glass MS- External Mast Arm Adapter 240-240V SG: Sag Glass HL- Hi/Low Dimming14 277=277V L= Lamp Included 347= 347V Naps: 1 8" arm and round pole adapter included with fixture. 2 Standard with mogul -base socket for HPS, MH and 250 - 400MP. Standard with medium -base socket for 480- 480V 20OW MP and below. 3 200/320/35OW Pulse Start Metal Halide lamps only. 4 Requires reduced envelope lamp. 5 Products also available in non -US voltages and 50Hz for international markets. Consult factory for availability and ordering information. 6 Dual -Tap bailout is 120/277V wired 277V. Multi -Tap ballast is DT= Dual -Tape 120/2081240/277V wired 277V. Triple -Tap ballast is 120277/347V wired 347V. 5-Tap ballast is 120208/240/277/480V wired 480V. 7 Available for 250 - 40OW only. 8 MT- Multi -Tape Vertical lamp optics ship standard with deep door. 250 - 40OW not available with flat glass. 9 Custom and RAL color matching available upon request. Consult Cooper Lighting Representative for further information. 10 Add as suffix. 11 Must specify voltage. 12 Quartz options not available with SL and AF optics. 13 TT- Triple -Taps House -side shield not available on 5S, 5F, AS, AR, and SL optics. 14 Requires vertical lamp orientation. Provides 24V low voltage leads used in dimming control. 5T= 5-Tap6• 7 15 Order separately, replace XX with color designation. Mown Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADHO80480 www.cooperlighting.com McGraw -Edison • Customer First Center • 1121 Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.486.4801 09/18/2008 10:29:15 AM MOUNTING CONFIGURATIONS Wall Mount Arm Mount Single Arm Mount 2 @ 180° Arm Mount 2 @ 901 Arm Mount 3 @ 1200 Arm Mount 3 @ 90° Arm Mount 4 @ 90° E.P.A. E.P.A. E.P.A. E.P.A. E.P.A. E.P.A. TLM TLM TLM TLM TLM TLM Recessed Door 1.22 Recessed Door 2.44 Recessed Door 2.44 Recessed Door 3.23 Recessed Door 3.23 Recessed Door 3.63 Deep Door 1.45 Deep Door 2.90 Deep Door 2.90 Deep Door 3.92 Deep Door 3.92 Deep Door 4.43 AW [V DA[Q=V0 U 4�v A§E OOP& Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADH080480 McGraw -Edison • Customer First Center • 1121 Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.486.4801 09/18/2008 10:29:15 AM www.cooperlighting.com 9 Y b, DESCRIPTION Low brightness 7-3/8" aperture lens downlight for use with a 26W or 32W Triple Twin Tube 4-pin lamp. The deeply regressed lens provides superb shielding in comparision to shallow lenses. Reflector trim eliminates brightness at higher angles. Choice of lens types for various aesthetics. Standard features include low iridescent finish on all reflector colors to eliminate "rainbowing" and one electronic ballast. Venting ensures lamp life and lumen output. Optics offer unparalleled performance in glare free lighting with a smooth beam devoid of hot spots. Medium beam, wide beam, lens and open wall wash trims are interchangeable within the same housing. SPECIFICATION FEATURES A ... Reflector .050" thick aluminum, in a one piece spun macrofocal parabolic contour. Available in a variety of AlzakOO finishes. Also available with white or black baffle. Positive reflector mounting pulls trim tight to ceiling. B ... Lens Choice of tempered fresnel, prismatic, diffuse, or clear glass lenses or molded prismatic acrylic, opal diffuser or clear UV stablized acrylic. Lens is fixed to lower reflector. C ... Socket Cap One piece vented and finned die cast aluminum cap for maximum thermal performance. D ... Housing Mounting Frame One piece precision die cast aluminum 1-1/2" deep collar accommodates varying dimensions of ceiling materials. E ... Universal Mounting Bracket Accepts 1/2" EMT, C Channel, T bar fasteners, and bar hangers. Adjusts 5" vertically from above or below ceiling. F ... Conduit Fittings Die cast screw tight connectors. G ... Junction Box Listed for eight #12AWG (four in, four out) 90eC conductors feed through branch wiring. ��dE�Lllllll i'�'`'1 ter• DTI ' ITS e r 1/2" and two 3/4" pry outs. Positioned to allow straight conduit runs. Access to junction box by removing reflector. H ... Socket 4 pin GX24q-3/4 base with fatigue free stainless steel lamp spring ensures positive lamp retention. 1 ... Electronic Ballast Electronic ballast provides full light output and rated lamp life. Provides flicker free and noise free operation and starting. End of lamp life protection is standard. Labels cULus listed, standard wet label. Top View 13 5/16' [338mm1 12 1/4" [311mml r%;•, O cP 4 D o 12 3/4" [324mm3 13 3/4" [349mml rrows"WrIlm. L i 17 5/8' [447mml (with EM Option) PORTFOLIOTM C7042 7081/80 26W, 32W TTT Compact Fluorescent 7-3/8" VERTICAL LENSED DOWNLIGHT 26W Triple 4-pin Ballast: Electronic 120V Input Watts: 29, Line Amps: 0.25 277V Input Watts: 29, Line Amps: 0.10 Power Factor: >.99 THD: <10%: Min Starting Temp.: -10oC (15°F) Sound Rating: A 32W Triple 4-pin Ballast: Electronic 120V Input Watts: 36, Line Amps: 0.32 277V Input Watts: 36, Line Amps: 0.16 Power Factor: >99 THD: <10%: Min Starting Temp.: -10QC 05oF) Sound Rating: A 32W Triple 4-pin Ballast: Dimming 120V Input Watts: 38, Line Amps: 0.31 277V Input Watts: 37, Line Amps: 0.13 Power Factor: >95 THD: <20%: Min Starting Temp.: 10oC (50'F) NOTES: Accessories should be ordered separately. For additional options please consult your Cooper Lighting Representative. Alzak is a registered trademark of Aluminum Company of America. Hi-Lume is a registered trademark of Lutron Co. Inc. ORDERING INFORMATION Sample Numbar: Complete unit consists of housing, ballast and trim. ring Ballast Options Trims Finish Lens Option Accessories 7" CF E: 120/277V 50/60 Hz Electronic CP= Chicago Trim a Ll- Low Iridescent Clear 1: Prismatic ygF- White HB2e= c Channel Bar Vertical 3E- 347V 50/60 Hz Electronic Plenum 7081= Self H°Haze Lens Painted Hangers, 26" Long. Pair 1D26° 26W 120V Dimming, Lutron = E EMmergency Flanged WMH=Warm Haze 2use ens L : Diffuse Flanged (Selig N66e=c channel Bar Wattage Compact SE P Module with 7080: Molded G°Gold 3°Clear Lens Flanged Hangers, 50" Long, 9 9 42=(1)26W DTT Lamp 2D26` 26W 277V Dimming, Lutron remote test switch Trim Ring, 9, White Ill 1G= Prismatic only) Pair FKS=5AMP Field 42' ( 1) 26W Or Compact SE W= Gloss White Glass Insta300Vliable Max Fuse Kit 3W TTT 1D32= 32W 120V Dimming, Lutron 26= Diffuse Compact SE GP= Graphite Glass RMB-22: Wood Joist Bar Lamp 2D32= 32W 277V Dimming, Lutron GPH: Graphite Haze 3G`Clear Hanger, r Long, Pair Compact SE K= Cognac Glass HSA7: Slope Adapter for EDR26: DeRated Wattage Label, 26W KH- Cognac Haze 40= Fresnel 7" Aperture EDR32: DeRated Wattage Label, 32W BB: Black Baffle (7080 only) Glass Sloupsings, specify / WB: White Baffle (7080 only) COOPER Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADPO40649 www.cooperlighting.com Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. 08/02/2008 12:16:51 PM PHOTOMETRICS Average Candlepower Distribution Candlepower Luminance Test No. H23391 Deg. CD Deg. CD/SO M 0 794 45 11577 C7042-7080LUG 5 797 55 6349 15 766 65 721 300 Lamp=32W TTT 25 610 75 434 Lumens=2400 35 393 85 458 Spacing 45 226 600 Criterion=1.0 55 100 Efficiency=45.9% 65 8 75 3 85 1 900 90 0 Zonal Lumen Summary Zone Lumens %Lamp %Luminsire 0-30 570 23.7 51.7 0-40 816 34.0 74.1 0-60 1081 45.0 98.1 0-90 1101 45.9 100.0 90-180 0 0.0 0.0 0-180 1101 45.9 100.0 C7042 7081/7080 Cone of Light Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Illuminated Plane Footcandles Diameter 6-0" 12 11.0• Beam diameter is to 50%of maximum footcandles, rounded to the nearest half -foot. Footcandle values are initial, apply appropriate light loss factors where necessary. Reflector EM Multiplier Multiplier: (in emergency Haze=.95 model Straw=.9 EM=.27 Wheat=.9 Coefficient of Utilization rc 80% 70% 50% 30% 10% 0% rw 70 50 30 10 50 30 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 0 RCR 0 55 55 55 55 53 53 53 51 51 49 49 47 47 46 1 52 50 49 48 49 48 47 47 45 46 44 44 43 42 2 48 46 44 42 45 43 41 43 40 42 39 41 39 38 3 45 42 39 37 41 39 37 40 36 39 36 38 35 34 4 42 38 35 33 38 35 33 37 32 36 32 35 32 31 5 40 35 32 30 35 32 30 34 29 33 29 32 29 28 6 37 33 29 27 32 29 27 31 27 31 27 30 26 26 7 35 30 27 25 30 27 25 29 24 29 24 28 24 23 8 33 28 25 23 28 25 23 27 22 27 22 26 22 22 9 31 26 23 21 26 23 21 25 21 25 21 25 21 20 10 30 24 21 19 24 21 19 24 19 23 19 23 19 18 rc=Ceiling reflectance, rw=Wall reflectance, RCR=Room cavity ratio CU Data Based on 20% Effective Floor Cavity Reflectance. COOPER Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADPO40649 www.cooperlighting.com Portfolio • Customer First Center • 1121 Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.486.4801 08/02/2008 12:16:51 PM eS.S c,71'245 0 Vol l c Z--1 -I ;r7 e Z 44 / r aAal 5 �o e cY/ Leo/ -14 s dc, c�/ �� • Ili -e. S J cl �, W �%C �/ /v Q i� e s / �7� / Y �j )e c S 7 74� rq " , "" C 7 —14 Yee ,Z -5-1 �w / 7�'l C7 C� -�ov 7z U Opt/ r -� 47 r C5 &-j 1-7 �j a \l 4 ��i-�,� � �� /rr -�-{ �' L e/� �va� r� c�,� '� �-�/U Bill Szy n§ki, City Engineer City f South Burlington 75 Dorset Street Sout Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 Williams Property Dorset Street February 22, 2007 1. Publi street rx.l. width should be 6Q--feet for entire length. lI 2. Bit min us pavement shall have `thickne /s of 4 inches ( 2 1/2 base, 1 '/2 urf ce). % 3. ra el width oi< road shall e a uniform idth of 6 f et. 4. Yul-de-sac ust be a�quate for a s ho�Itsh s to� around. 5. Sewage pu 'j ing*ation will be pr'vat . Id be outside of the public stre t r.ov. Station contro ler shall b placed close to the wet well. / 6. The engineer shall evaluate the sewer force main, taking into account all stations on it and stations that will be connected to it. 7. Sewage pumping station shall have a gravel access drive. 8. Water service shut off valves should be within the street r.o.w. 9. Each lot shall have a foundation drain shown on the plans. / 1O.Bench marks shall be noted on the plans. 11.Sewer services shall be perpendicular to the main line, not skewed as plans show. 12.Street r.o.w. concrete monuments shall be shown on -the plans. 07202 Chastenay Development Shared Parking Calculations New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio Spaces I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Retail 7,838 8 3.5 27 0.7 20 0.85 24 0.8 22 0.8 22 1 28 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 81 47 51 74 74 67 n inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle February 27, 2009 Paul Boisvert, PE Engineering Ventures, Inc. 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 21 Burlington, VT 05401 Re: March 3, 2009 Hearing — Chastenay Trust Dear Mr. Boisvert: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, March 3, 2009 at 7:30 p.m. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com outWtirfingtom, Vf�Mli Y Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST U- 0 LTMAJ �3 >r�,k'.� C -1-Jil 57E01Y y (y& A c Sl-- C ,; A k ©o6` c s + Li's ►, �. `� �� y S ��Qs IV C9�re6 , A �ttLl� ffial southbtu-tom. V[RM I N T Interested Persons Record and Service List 1pf log. Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: 3 Z31/0 7 TLEP�sE-TP1 1',4T cL-E,1 0 NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST 'Ge-0 V%qe SO COC1nie'l ctCib AG,C-Icla V o o 4 o v1 �l i I-rakCIT nn y4v COLL%AV-clot A ro. ,6,t;4-,K 0- ro4evW- �-6L,,, 76.e5er Ste, Lk ea.(� P- Lod o V J Gl�� k C6, 1; 306 i�� qC/4zic. �J lei t t\9i .V 1 0u qz .C-✓ V��flgl� ,��lyl•(1 qqq W a+.4'i! iJt —i9 5r ' Y 1 &9A L l All 6 --6,v ,W CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five workin da s. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: C CZ-44"Y' ' NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST S1LVA l���e'513 C (4 l grE NEV .�'RV i e N W- PO IV C Qa v i m l I l ld ,jaa d Coy d Vr F 0��� h e3 _y s u3il� VT" February 20, 2009 Stella Chastenay Trust 97 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 111-113 Hinesburg Road Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the March 3, 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburi.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Cc: Paul Boisvert, PE @ Engineering Ventures, Inc. 208 Flynn Ave, Suite 2A Burlington, VT 05401 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Thai Yoga Bodywork Y. IN YOGA: Daily yoga r all Levels, convenient- J in Burlington. Cost: ass cards and unlimited lips available for dis- rates. Mon., Wed., Fri. classes are sliding scale ocation:Evolution Yoga, n. Info: 802-864-9642, .utionvt.com. Our -staff tified teachers are skilled nners as well as students to refine their practice. 4nusara-Inspired, Kripalu, and babies/kids classes Prepare for birth and -n post-partum with pre/ ,l yoga. Participate in our ty blog: evolutionvt;caml )GA CLASS!: Location: ite 7, North Ferrisburgh. in Hart, 802-310-8291, 9@comcast.net. Miracles is pleased to offer Vinyaso Ia classes for adult mate beginning Feb. 10. Class Fered on Tue. & Thur. at 6 i Sat at 10 a.m. Clothing is acceptable. DID AT THE FIELD HOUSE- iga & Pilates classes, for .s. Drop -ins welcome; no ship required. Cost: $15/ $60/month (6 classes). �d yoga, $70 (incl. club ship). Location: 166 Ath- ive, Shelburne. Info: 802- )6, www.shelburneath- b.com. Vinyasa, Iyengar, Yin, Ashtango & Kripalu as well as reformer, mat & 'ilates. 0 W ACT 250 NOTICE MINOR APPLICATION 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 On January 29, 2009, NYNEX Mobile Limited Partnership 1 and CeLLco Partnership ("Verizon Wireless'), and Vermont Public Radio ("VPR"), filed application # 4C1216 for a project generally described as: The installation of a 10' extension to an existing 90', three -sided, lattice tower owned by VPR, to mount total of 12 panel anten- nas, both PCS and cellular, at approximately 98' above ground Level. The Project includes the construction of a 12'4" x 31'6" equipment shelter for Verizon Wireless and a 19'2" x 31'6" stor- age space for VPR, topped with a common roof to appear as one building. The Project also includes the removal of one, on -ground satellite dish, along with various site improvements. The Project is located at 365 Troy Avenue in the Town of Colchester, VT. ers. Puzzles on page 41a. ©UM • MPEn een IU .-MURN issue, why a nearing is ie4uueu and what additional evidence will be presented at the hearing. Any hearing request by an adjoining property owner or other interested person must include a petition for party status. Prior to submitting a request for a hearing, please contact the district coordinator at the telephone number listed below for more information. Prior to convening a hearing, the District Commission must determine that substantive issues requiring a hearing have been raised. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless the Com- mission holds a public hearing. Should a hearing be held on this project and you have a disability for which. you are going to need accommodation, please notify us by Friday, February 27, 2009. . Parties entitled to participate are the Municipality, the Municipal Planning Commission, the Re- gional Planning Commission, adjoining property owners, other interested persons granted party status pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 6085(c). Non-party participants may also be allowed under 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(5). Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this 5th day of February, 2009. By/s/ Stephanie H. Monaghan Stephanie H. Monaghan Natural Resources Board District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/ 802-879-5662 E/ stephanie.monaghan@state. vt.us oma©a o©On moo Moa0 MM©MM DEMO EMao woman Mummm EMMM ©mmm ommom ma© MMmM MMOMMME anom n©oommumanummummE©mam ©am mom momm© nMMM ©m© Mm InmaHamm MMEMO© MME©� MEM©DEMO© MDOMm amm HMO MOMmo omm DO©amm gym©m©oam Mom�mMmMM EMU= MUMMM nMOMO mom a©Om manna EonaM mama MOM©© mMOm©nMODO©a©EnmM' MEMO Enoa© EM nMOO ©naM MM MMME OEM DOOM© EOM a©am ©EMMO oaoaM Emma Ommm momum - _Mm©©_- ©OM MMMM _ ©o©nE rirst MUM, 14tl �nwuoucc�, Burlington), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30�.m. David White, AICP, . actor of Planning and Zoning Individuals who require special arrangements to participate are encouraged to contact the Depart- ment at least 72 hours in advance. For information call 865-7188 (865-7142 TTY). NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Burlington Housing Authority is preparing a Five Year Plan for fiscal years 2010 - 2014 and an Annual Plan for its fiscal year July - 1.,,2,009 - June 30, 2010. It is also considering updates to the Admission and Continued Occupancy Policy for Public Hous- ing and the Administrative Plan for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. A public hearing to obtain com- ments regarding the proposed Five Year Plan, Annual Plan and possible revisions to Administra- tive Plans will be held on Tuesday, April 14th, 2008 at 6:00 PM in the Community Room at Champlain Apartments, 10 North Champlain Street, Burlington, Vermont. Written comments should be sent to: Paul Dettman, Executive Director Burlington Housing Authority 65 Main Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY All real estate advertising in this newspaper is subject to the Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 and similar Vermont statutes which make it illegal to advertise any preference, limitations, or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, sexual ori- entation, age, marital status, handicap, presence of minor children in the family nr receipt of public assistance, or an intention to make any such preference, limitation or a discrimination. The newspaper will not knowingly accept any advertising for real estate, which is in violation of the law. Our readers are hereby informed that all dwellings, advertised in this newspaper are avail- able on an equal opportunity basis. Any home seeker who feels her or she has encountered discrimination should contact the: HUD Office of Fair Housing, 10 Causeway St., Boston, MA 02222-1092 (617) 565-5309. OR Vermont Human Rights Commission, 135 State St„Drawer 33, Montpelier, VT 05633-6301.800- 416-2010 Fax:802-828-2480 the proposed project, and to give affected citizens the opportunity to examine the proposed state- ment of projected use of these funds. The proposal is to apply for $ 600,000 in VCDP Funds which will be used to accomplish the following activities: To construct a 24-unit senior rent- al housing building immediately adjacent to Grand Way Commons Senior Housing on Farrell Street in South Burlington. The building will provide affordable housing with services to low and moderate income seniors and persons with disabilities. Copies of the proposed application are available at South Burlington Municipal Offices and Cathedral Square Corp. offices at 412 Farrell Street, S. Burlington and may be viewed during the hours of 8:00 to 4:30 PM, M-F. Should you require any special accommodations, please contact Molly Dugan at (802) 863-3370 to ensure appro- priate accommodations are made. For the hearing impaired please call(TTY) # 1-800-253-0191. Legislative Body for the City of South Burlington, VT (30) PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, March 3, 2009 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Conditional use application #CU-09-14 of Jeffrey Lyon to construct a 722 sq. ft. accessory residential unit, 26 Country Club Drive. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board A copy of the application is avail- able for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. February 9, 2009 7 Permit Number SD- - l D APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax S-���1� c�,�s+�,,•�,. T,,►. r4 • 9-7 H4,,.rG.v s !Z4_ SoV4L r?i- 0 S` yu x ?r /... L- r. r 7.7 y . o 9 11 ( �r....., cl,.. o.-P,1,/ ) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) V yr 5 , P. 772 9' 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) APPLICANT .S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Peill ao r E • iet F ,, v� Ste% r l: T O u 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: /11 9 /1 3 /7;hcfbv✓�2 IZ4. 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) p S6 o - oo 1 ! I o 66 o - ©o ►I -? 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (includingdescriptionand size of each separate use) SII"7q7G G/f � '�i /g hury%e- W;W, aCf-Cr bV">� r_rK 2 t b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) New r1 -, )ee, - of c bad I -ta w i' !k 0-9 vrn i }1 and 7 Soo c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 3r 9oo GFA f-,tsi d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) = V ' S L o vr- G ve . yo rc - c, o)-,Pt. 0 YA j c e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) oZ ti rer"de 1 r"C'1yr\ "q-f O?V-Q gase. f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) ?7,e /'j:ncJ�v�y 2./. �r•�f�i c oycr l cy D;,rfrfc f 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing /. 9 % Proposed 1 i % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing% Proposed 70 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing _% Proposed % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Co ^„e c.-{ h J p ro A ors �fio , 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) See r jj-%<,k 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE TIT. D. 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I 1" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. Pq I I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIG ATURE OF APPLICA4YT SIGNATURE OF PROPER ER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: Complete Z---) ❑ Incomplete v� of Planning & Zoning or Designee 3 Chastenay Mixed Use Building Vehicle Traffic Estimates OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs I Size VPD General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 13 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 21 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 12 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 22 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 87 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 IDwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 249 RETAIL/ RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 54 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 62 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 J1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 22 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 32 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 348 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 510 RETAIL / OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size T VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 27 General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 7 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 35 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 11 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 6 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 21 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 174 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 44 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 336 Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 Chastenay Mixed Use Building Vehicle Traffic Estimates OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 13 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 21 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 12 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 22 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 87 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 249 RETAIL/ RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. I Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 54 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 62 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 22 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 IDwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 32 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 348 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 1 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 510 RETAIL / OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 27 General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 7 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 35 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 11 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 6 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 21 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 174 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 44 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 336 Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 Chastenay Mixed Use Building Vehicle Traffic Estimates OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 13 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 21 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 12 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 IDwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 22 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 87 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 1 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 1 249 RETAIL / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 54 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 62 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 22 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 32 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 348 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 510 RETAIL / OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 27 General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 7 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 35 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 11 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 6 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 21 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 174 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 44 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 336 Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 Chastenay Mixed Use Building Vehicle Traffic Estimates OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 11000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 13 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 IDwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 21 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 12 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 IDwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 22 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 11000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 87 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 IDwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 249 RETAIL/ RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 54 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 62 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 22 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 32 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 11000sq.ft.GFA 7,838 348 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 510 RETAIL / OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 27 General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 7 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 35 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 11 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 6 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 21 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 174 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 44 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 336 Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 Chastenay Mixed Use Building Vehicle Traffic Estimates OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate -Trip Ends vs. Size VPD General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 13 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 21 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 11000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 12 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 22 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 87 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 249 RETAIL / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 54 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 62 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 22 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 32 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 348 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 510 RETAIL / OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 27 General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 7 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 35 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 11 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 6 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 21 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 174 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 44 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 336 Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 Chastenay Mixed Use Building Vehicle Traffic Estimates OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate I Trip Ends vs. Size VPD General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 13 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 IDwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 21 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 12 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 1 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 22 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 11000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 87 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 1 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 1 249 RETAIL / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate I Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 54 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 62 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 22 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 32 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 348 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 IDwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 510 RETAIL / OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 27 General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 7 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 35 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 11 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 6 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 21 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 174 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 44 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 336 Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 Chastenay Mixed Use Building Vehicle Traffic Estimates OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate I Tri Ends vs. Size VPD General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 13 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 21 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 12 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 22 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 87 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 1 249 RETAIL/ RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 54 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 62 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 22 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 32 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 7,838 348 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 510 RETAIL / OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL Use Avg. rate Trip Ends vs. Size VPD Specialty Retail (814) - A.M. Peak 6.84 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 27 General Office (710) - A.M. Peak 1.55 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 7 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - A.M. Peak 0.3 Dwelling Units 24 8 TOTAL 35 Specialty Retail (814) - P.M. Peak 2.71 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 11 General Office (710) - P.M. Peak 1.49 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 6 Mid -Rise Apartment (223) - P.M. Peak 0.39 Dwelling Units 24 10 TOTAL 21 Specialty Retail (814) - ADT 44.32 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 174 General Office (710) - ADT 11.01 1000 sq. ft. GFA 3,919 44 Apartment (220) - ADT 6.72 Dwelling Units 24 162 TOTAL 336 Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 07202 Chastenay Development Shared Parking Calculations New Building GFA I Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) I per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces I % Present I Cars % Present Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Retail 7,838 8 5 39 0.7 28 0.85 34 0.8 32 0.8 32 1 40 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 93 55 61 84 84 79 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 3 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. 7 Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars I % Present Cars Office 7,838 8 3.5 27 1 28 0.97 27 0.05 2 0.05 2 0.17 5 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 81 55 54 54 54 44 ( inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1SP @8'w/8'aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA I Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) I per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Office 7,838 4 3.5 14 1 14 0.97 14 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.17 3 Retail 7,838 4 5 20 0.7 14 0.85 17 0.8 16 0.8 16 1 20 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 43,673 87 55 58 69 69 ' 62 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1SP @8'w/8'aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 07202 Chastenay Development Shared Parking Calculations New Building GFA I Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) I per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present 1 Cars I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present Cars Retail 7,838 8 5 39 0.7 28 0.85 34 0.8 32 0.8 32 1 40 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 93 1 55 61 84 84 79 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 3 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars I % Present Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Office 71838 8 3.5 27 1 28 0.97 27 0.05 2 0.05 2 0.17 5 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 81 55 54 54 54 44 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Office 7,838 4 3.5 14 1 14 0.97 14 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.17 3 Retail 7,838 4 5 20 0.7 14 0.85 17 0.8 16 0.8 16 1 20 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 43,673 87 55 58 69 69 62 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 07202 Chastenay Development Shared Parking Calculations New Building GFA I Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) I per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present Cars % Present Cars Retail 7,838 8 5 39 0.7 28 0.85 34 0.8 32 0.8 32 1 40 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 93 55 61 84 84 79 ) inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 3 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking 7-7 Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Office 71838 8 3.5 27 1 28 0.97 27 0.05 2 0.05 2 0.17 5 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 81 55 54 54 54 44 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch 7 Weekday PM 7WeekdayEve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Office 7,838 4 3.5 14 1 14 0.97 14 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.17 3 Retail 7,838 4 5 20 0.7 14 0.85 17 0.8 16 0.8 16 1 20 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 TOTAL 43,673 87 55 58 69 69 J�2 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2SP @8'w/5'aisle Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 07202 Chastenay Development Shared Parking Calculations New Building GFA I Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) I per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Retail 71838 8 5 39 0.7 28 0.85 34 0.8 32 0.8 32 1 40 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 93 55 61 84 84 79 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1SP @8'w/8'aisle 3 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking I Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio Spaces % Present Cars % Present Cars % Present Cars % Present Cars % Present Cars Office 7,838 8 3.5 27 1 28 0.97 27 0.05 2 0.05 2 0.17 5 Residential 27,9971 24 2.25 1 54 1 0.5 1 27 1 0.5 1 27 1 0.95 1 52 1 0.95 1 52 1 0.71 1 39 TOTAL 35,8351 81 55 54 54 54 44 A A inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. 7 Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars Office 7,838 4 3.5 14 1 14 0.97 14 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.17 3 Retail 71838 4 5 20 0.7 14 0.85 17 0.8 16 0.8 16 1 20 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 43,673 87 55 58 69 69 62 A /\ inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 07202 Chastenay Development Shared Parking Calculations New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Retail 7,838 8 5 39 0.7 28 0.85 34 0.8 32 0.8 32 1 40 Residential 27,9971 24 2.25 1 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,8351 1 93 1 55 61 84 J 84 79 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 3 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio Spaces % Present Cars % Present Cars % Present Cars % Present Cars % Present Cars Office 7,838 8 3.5 27 1 28 0.97 27 0.05 2 0.05 2 0.17 5 Residential 27,9971 24 2.25 1 54 1 0.5 1 27 1 0.5 1 27 1 0.95 1 52 1 0.95 1 52 1 0.71 1 39 TOTAL 35,8351 1 81 1 1 55 1 1 54 1 1 54 1 1 54 1 1 44 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM 7WeekdayEve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Office 7,838 4 3.5 14 1 14 0.97 14 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.17 3 Retail 7,838 4 5 20 0.7 14 0.85 17 0.8 16 0.8 16 1 20 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 43,673 87 55 58 69 69 62 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 07202 Chastenay Development Shared Parking Calculations New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch 7Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) I per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Retail 7,838 8 5 39 0.7 28 0.85 34 0.8 32 0.8 32 1 40 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 93 55 61 84 84 79 ) inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 3SP @8'w/5'aisle New Building GFA I Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) I per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present Cars Office 7,838 8 3.5 27 1 28 0.97 27 0.05 2 0.05 2 0.17 5 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 81 55 54 54 54 44 ) inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1SP @8'w/8'aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces I % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars I % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Office 7,838 4 3.5 14 1 14 0.97 14 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.17 3 Retail 7,838 4 5 20 0.7 14 0.85 17 0.8 16 0.8 16 1 20 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 43,673 87 55 58 69 69 62 ) inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1SP @8'w/8'aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09 07202 Chastenay Development Shared Parking Calculations New Building GFA I Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) I per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Retail 7,838 8 5 39 0.7 28 0.85 34 0.8 32 0.8 32 1 40 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 93 55 61 84 84 79 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 3SP @8'w/5'aisle New Building GFA I Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM 7Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) I per 1,000 SF or DU Ratio I Spaces % Present Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars Office 7,838 8 3.5 27 1 28 0.97 27 0.05 2 0.05 2 0.17 5 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 35,835 81 55 54 54 54 44 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle New Building GFA Size Peak Parking Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Weekday Eve. Saturday Use (SF) per 1,000 SF or DU I Ratio i Spaces % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present I Cars % Present Cars Office 7,838 4 3.5 14 1 14 0.97 14 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.17 3 Retail 7,838 4 5 20 0.7 14 0.85 17 0.8 16 0.8 16 1 20 Residential 27,997 24 2.25 54 0.5 27 0.5 27 0.95 52 0.95 52 0.71 39 TOTAL 43,673 87 55 58 69 69 62 inc. 3 HC accessible parking spaces 1 SP @ 8' w/ 8' aisle 2 SP @ 8' w/ 5' aisle Engineering Ventures, 3/3/09