Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-82-0000 - Supplemental - 0075 Hinesburg RoadJanuary 4, 1983 Ray.riond Unswor th 1700 Spear Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Pay, During my year-end review of my records, I noticed you have not yet suUr,itted a pedestrian trail easement or a reviser,' site plan for the car- ports at Village Green Apartments. Enclosed is a copy of the stipulations for t1hese items. They must be submitted before a building permit Pey be issued (ex-piration date, 4/12/83). Please call if you have any �_jLx�stions. Sincerely, David H. SiDitz, City Planner DHS/mcq I ,--,ncl October 13, 1982 Ray Unsworth 1700 Spear Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Unsworth, Enclosed is a copy of the South Burlington Planning Commission's site plan approval with stipulations and findings of fact for your new carports at Village Green Apartments on Hinesburg Road. The legal documents (1 easement deed and I offer of dedication) for the pedestrian trail must be submitted and approved before you can receive a build- ing permit. Enclosed is a sample offer of dedication forin in addition to the easement form that I already gave you. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Plea, - DHS/R)cg 3 Encls September 28, 1982 Mr. Raymond Unsworth 1700 Spear Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 75 Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Unsworth: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment granted your request for a zoning variance. Your proposal is subject to site plan approval by the Planning Commission, please contact the City Planner for scheduling. The Board will issue formal findings at a later date. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT � Name, address and telephone # of applicant Name, address of property owner /C.$ 4�rJr % /`1 Property location and description G 11_ C "9C l�vW4 �,vGTo,v �c�l�P� s r� /r v 7W S TET I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date ignature of Appellant Do not write below this line SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Con �!rence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at (day of eek) month and date) time to consider the following: Appeal of seeking a ^.� from Section /l , a oj_t�'a� �- /���►'►a�+.� al � �� //-aO GIv+-ou�.. —0� � _� o �� irrp?�f the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permit sion to /c� LEGAL NOTICES SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Bur- lington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, September 27, 1982, at 5:00 PM to consider the following: NO. 1 Appeal of Raymond Un- sworth seeking a variance, from Section 11.00, Dimensional re- quirements and Section 11.20 Conservation -Open Space District of the South Burlington Regu- lations. Request is for permission to construct carports for thirty ve- hicles, one building 28' x 44' to be located to within twenty-four (24) feet of a property line and a sec- ond building to be located to within thirty-four (34) feet of a mi- nor drainageway, at Village Green Apartments, 75 Hinesburg Road. NC. 2 Appeal of E.F. Wall and Associates, Inc., agents for Frank Bartlett seeking approval, from Section 8.10, Conditional Uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to con- struct a 80' x 120' building, and occupy some as a automotive and building glass service center, d.b.a. Portland Glass, at 1800 Shel- burne Road. No. 3 Appeal of Richard A. Brice seeking a variance, from Section 11.00, Dimensional requirements of the South Burlington Regu- lations. Request is for permission to construct a 18' x 24' attached garage to within approximately fifteen (1S) feet of the easterly side Yard and twenty-three (23) feet of the rear yard, at 247 White Street. No. 4 Appeal of Thomas and Barbara Lozen seeking a vari- ance, from Section 13.00, Non -con- forming uses & structures of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest Is for permission to con- struct a 14' x 30' addition to within ten (10) feet of the easterly side vard, at 35 McIntosh Avenue. NO. 5 Appeal of William Wessel seeking a variance, from Section 6.00, sub -section 6.003 Permitted Uses of the South Burlington Reg- ulations. Request is for permission to construct a 20,000 square feet, two story, office complex, on a lot containing 2.48 acres, located at 1 Kennedy Drive. NO 6 Appeal of Earl and Jesse Foley seeking a variance, from Section 11.15, Multiple Uses and Section 7.00 Permitted Uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest Is for permission to display and sell used automobiles in con- junction with an existing bicycle sales and service business at 142 Dorset Street. NO 7 Appeal of Richard C. Lands- man seeking a variance, from Sec- tion 6.00, Permitted Uses and Sec- tion 11.00, Dimensional require- ments of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for per- mission to construct an odditon 7'8" x 14'10" to within forty eight (48) feet of the required front yard and to occupy a dwelling unit for business and residential purposes, at 341 Dorset Street. Richard Word, 9/11/82 Zoning Administrative Officer September 13, 1982 Mr. Raymond Unsworth 1700 Spear Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning hearing Dear Mr. Unsworth: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, September 27, 1982 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/ricg r � v PLAVNING COMMISSION 2. OCTUB ;R 12, 1982 unlikely that the building would change hands. Mr. Spitz noted that a letter of credit did not keep pace with inflation. He was asked how he had arrived at the suggested figure of $10,000 and said that he had looked at other examples recently and how much they had paid per peak hour car. Using the same ratio would have come to a figure of $5,000 to $6,000, but this case is geared toward one intersection only. Mr. Poger was uneasy about requesting a contribution toward intersection improvements which might not be made for 5-15 years, during which time GIMP would be adding to traffic at the intersection. He felt that in this case, perhaps the money should be given back after 5 years, or none should be requested at all. Mr. Mona did not agree. Mr. Woolery noted that money had been requested for traffic improvements from every major development recently and he felt that procedure should be followed here, for consistency. Mr. Belter suggested adding an interest rate to the letter of credit. Mr. Mona moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission accept a $5,000 assessment from Green Mountain Power Corporation for road improvements in the Shelburne Road -Green Mountain Drive intersection area. This assessment to be received in a letter of credit which will grow at the rate of 5 per year. There shall be an automatic Planning Commission review after 5 years. Mr. Woolery seconded the motion. Mr. Poger was uneasy with this because the city has no power to improve that State road, nor do they have specific improvements in mind for it. He stated that while he would not vote against it, he could neither vote for it. The motion carried with 4 in favor and Mr. Poger abstaining. Sketch plan review of application by Homestead .Design, Inc., for a 6 lot subdivision on Bartlett's Bay Road Mr, Mona stated that he had been delayed tonight by the police department, which had told him that Mr. Robert Marcellino had called and told them that he would not be able to come in tonight. Mr. Spitz said the sketch plan would be rescheduled. Site plan review of application by Village Green Apartments for 30 carports to serve existing residential units Mr. Spitz said the units and drives existed and that no change in land- scaping was proposed. The application was granted two variances from the Zoning Board. One was a side yard variance, so that they could take down as few trees as possible, and the other was a setback from the stream in the area. There will be one carport plus some storage per unit, as well as some open spaces. There will be no fewer parking spaces than before. The Fire Chief has seen the plan and does not object. Mr. Spitz said there was a pedestrian trail shown in the Comprehensive Plan in this area. Mrs. Unsworth, speaking for the development, said she did not object to such a trail and Mr. Mona said it should be noted on the plan of record. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application by Village Green Apartments for 30 carports at 75 Iiinesbur Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Carport Additions Village Green Apart- ments," prepared by Paul E. Wamsganz, dated 8 22 82, subject to the following stipulations: 1. An offer of dedication for a 15 foot wide pedestrian trail easement along the north side of the drainageway shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. The easement shall also be marked on the site plan and s. PLAiiNING COMMISSION OCTOB ER 12, 1982 the plan of record._ 2. This approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Mona seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Discussion of requirements for through -street connection for Ridgewood Estates and "Indian Creek" Mr. Spitz showed the original plan for the property. That development went bankrupt and another developer picked it up and requested a redesign of the area. He noted that the "Indian Creek" area was now under separate land ownership and that a subdivision was needed for that. That subdivision had never been presented to this body. Ms. Ed Smith said he was president of the Ridgewood Homeowner's Association. They have been told they are in violation of the original plan for•not putting the road through. As far as they are concerned, that connection would be between two private developments. Mr. Poger noted that approval was given for the entire area as a single development and that until the road was put through as originally planned, they were in violation. Mr. Smith said the Indian Creek area was in separate ownership. The Vermont Federal Bank developed it separately and transferred 12 Ridgewood units to their third phase. Mr. Poger said the Commission was never asked for a subdivision. Mr. Smith said the bank had wanted to keep the two areas separate and they told Ridgewood residents that the connecting road would be for emergency vehicles only. Mr. Poger said they had had no right to make such a statement. Mr. Smith said the road was put in this summer and had been a disaster. There were a lot of cars using it to get from Dorset St. to Swift St., avoiding the corner. 'He felt the original plan had called for a private drive serving one property, but now there would be an unnecessary connection between two private areas. Ridgewood wants the road closed to all but emergency vehicles and had a petition to that effect. Mr. Frank Murray added that Ridgewood was concerned about privacy and safety with the increased traffic on the roads. Maintenance is also a concern. With the separation, there are fewer units to help absorb road maintenance costs. The road is not well lit and there are no sidewalks. Young children and elderly people walk in the area. Mr. Lee Liggett said lie was Vice President of the Ridgewood Association. He noted that his Association had jurisdiction over phases 1 and 2 of the original design, but that phase 3 was now under someone else as a separate legal entity. He felt the road in question had probably served a practical purpose in the original plan, but now, with two separate entities, it made no sense to tie them together. Ridgewood agrees it needs an access for emergency vehicles, but that is all it wants. Mr. Demer noted that the road was not paved, but Mr. Spitz said the Indian Creek developer would have to pave it after some utilities were put in. Mr. Poger felt that with the subdivision coming in after the buildings went up, this was a piecemeal approach. He also noted that the city usually reviewed Articles of Association and that any major changes to those articles should be reviewed by the city, after notification of the changes by the association. He was disturbed by what had happened here. Mr. 'noolery added that there should be an overall association for the whole project. He did not like the fact that the project had apparently splintered into two groups without the city knowing about it. He was afraid of what would happen if the association said it could no longer maintain the roads by itself. The city would not step in. If condominium associations like this started to splinter all over the city, they would become like individual homes and any association Date Received By Date Application Completed and Received By By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVI&I 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE•NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record Ray UNSWORTH 1700 Spear St. So. Burlington, Vt (b) Applicant VILLAGE GREEN APARTMENTS (c) Contact Person Ray Unsworth 862-0480 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 75 Hinesburg Road, So Burlington , Vt opposite RUTH St. 3) PROPOSED USES): Tennant personal STORAGE & CARPORTS 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e.,-# of units, floor area, etc.) Presently 30 Apartments, Request 30 Units 10'x 18' plus 8' x 10' unheated storage area All end units 2 wider than interior units 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full &. part time) 30 Tenants 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings $ 6,000 (b) Landscaping $ 200. (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) Some Paving 7) ESTIMATED PROTECT COMPLETION DATE November 1982 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION No Change October 1, 1982 DATE SIGNATTfE OF APPLICANT 14 1 Septeuw.,-,r , t", 19h2 Mr. I Unswurtli qpuke co LL-3 aboat '41-c-L tiack" iv,(: CarpOlLa, iit! Iii ;;otiaidcring at uic Vi x i a6e Green A:partfiwi,,ts. We un(ierstaiid diat wciile the u�uai set bat.k :.,4 ri111-t-V feef at 11?k A r4w 1 i4 U 6 8 t 8,-_ t f 2, h C, Te e S will be preserved ii tuic carports arr L-wenth daree feet frow our westerly lot -11ine. Theie is tiow a cor.i- jiderabie awouat of iiatural t,,rUWLri Loaf aCt.8 as- a -Oufter and Mr. UCISWILI) is goixig to set: out an ad'ditiorial, scoLca p'iile. We bave 10 05j4ICt,iOU to thv tm6aty Larce foot. sat bacit. c 5, ro rg . X)Tril ift) C Lt.) DHS 10/12/82 MOTION OF APPROVAL For the Site Plan Application by Village Green Apartments for 30 carports at 75 Hinesburg Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Carport Additions, Village Green Apartments", prepared by Paul E. Wamsganz, dated 8/22/82: Stipulations 1) An offer of dedication for a 15 foot wide pedestrian trail easement along the northern boundary of the property shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. The easement also shall be marked on the site plan. 2) This approval expires in 6 months. on another portion of the property. A lesser option would be reduced building envelopes on these 2 lots and a buffer area in which trees could not be removed. Storm drainage also will have to be reviewed carefully. 4) Village Green Apartments Proposal is for 30 carports to serve 30 existing apartment units. There will be almost no change in current circulation patterns and surfaced areas, and all carports will be on the opposite side of the driveway from the, units. The Zoning Board recently granted 2 dimensional variances, 1 for a side - yard and 1 frcm a minor stream. r. This is a fairly straightforward application, and I see no problems. 5) Ridgewood Q145WAk Reattl AREA CODE 802 PHONE 862-0480 BOX 241 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 July 5, 1969 Mr. Henry LeClair Town Manager Town of South Burlington 555 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vt. Dear Mr. LeClair; This letter constitutes written request that the Proposed Town House Complex of 30 units to be located on the West Side of Hinesburg Road Opposite Ruth Street be placed on the agenda of the Planning Commission Meeting to be held July 22, 1969. Herewith is submitted check #4034 for $30.00 to cover stipulated newspaper advertising. The office of architect John McKenna has submitted or will sub- mit plans and specifications in accordance with the two Planning Commission check lists where applicable. We believe the plans are in conformity with the Sub -Division requirements of South Burlington and will make an attractive addition to the community in the category where such housing is most urgently needed. Very trul yours, Ray Jnsworth RRU:ncw :4:7c 87-RM2 ijijUa'1 SEND PARTS AND 3 .yYITIi CARB014S INTACT -- KEEP PAkT 3' FOR FOLLOW -Up I, SOUTH BURLINGTON LEGAL NOTICE The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold o public hearing at the South Burlington High School, Cafeteria #2, Dorset Street, South Burlington, Ver- mont, on Tuesday, August 12, 1969 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Appeal of Jere S. Meserole, Treasurer of Lakelands Corporation, Burlington, Vermont, for approval of a proposed subdivision development of a parcel of land located between the railroad on the east and the lake on the west and known as the former Bartlett property on Shelburne Road. The appeal is for permission to construct condominium housing, as shown on plans on file at the Town Manager's office. 2. Appeal of Ray Unsworth of South Burlington, Vermont, for approval of a pro- posed subdivision development on a parcel of land located between 71 and 97 Hinesburg Road, as recorded in Volume 85, page 377 of the South Burlington Land Records. The appeal is for permission to construct a proposed town house co lex of 30 units as shown on plans on file at the Town Manager's office. Frederic O. Sargent, Chairman ���,A 9 South Burlington Planning Commission No Text Village Green Apartments Raymond Unsworth 75 Hinesburg Road Area zoned R-4 District Section 11.00 Dimensional requirements Minimum front and rear yard - 30' Minimum side yard - 15' Section 11.20 Conservation Open -Space Drainageway - minor stream Minimum setback from center line of minor stream 50' Proposed - Carports for 30 vehicles within area of existing parking spaces. One building 28'x44' to be located to within twenty four (24) feet of a property line and second to be within thirty-four (34) feet of drainageway.