The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSD-10-00 - Supplemental - 0055 Highland TerraceJOSEPH D. FALLON ATTORNEY AT LAW P. 0. BOX 257, 10729 ROUTE 116 HINESBURG, VT 05461 (802) 482-2137 FAX (802) 482-2138 EMAIL jfallonga madriver.com November 16, 2010 Mr. Patrick O'Brien 200 Old Farm Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Patrick: This letter is in response to your inquiry as to whether the protective covenants set forth in the deed from Susan B. Fine to Douglas W. Maynes and Elaine Steele Maynes dated May 14, 1996, and of record in Book 392, Pages 578-579 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, prohibit the subdivision of the Maynes parcel. I am enclosing herewith a copy of the protective covenants referenced in the Maynes deed. As you can see, Paragraph 2 provides that lots shall not be subdivided. Having said this, the map referred to in the protective covenants, a copy of which I am enclosing herewith, describes Lot 2 as having a depth of only 200 feet. As you can see from the Maynes deed, the depth of the Maynes lot is some 450 feet, more or less. Clearly, the "no subdivision" prohibition does not apply to any portion of Lot 2 beyond that which is shown on the enclosed plan. In sum, the protective covenants do not prohibit the subdivision of the rear portion of the Maynes property from Lot 2 as shown on the enclosed plan. If you would like me to perform additional title work beyond that described in this letter, please contact me. I am enclosing herewith my Statement for Legal Services Rendered. Very t y yours, Joseph D. Fallon JDF:sjl Enclosures PATRICK O'BRIEN DEVELOPMENT, LLC 200 Old Farm Road South Burlington, Vr 05403 Phone (802) 3 73-0096 Piobden66@oomcast.net Proposed lot width to depth ratio LOT# WIDTH(frontage) DEPTH RATIO 1 200 160 1:.80 2 85 145 1:1.7 3 85 115 1:1.35 4 95 85 1:.89 Shalna Property Highland Terrace 0 120 240 480 720 91 Feet 60 Well Depth {ft) Yield (gpm) 23 156 20 60 325 12 61 240 60 71 362 3 72 250 60 Water Supply Division Pagel of 3 dgc home dec r..alendar comae# dec topic index sitsrnap search • "` Supply wsd home regulations 91 Critical Infrastructure Protection Information ? Permit, Certification & License Application Forms & Information ? Water System Capacity Development & DWSRF Well Driller & Well Location Program 3 Source Water Protection > Water System Operators Drinking Water Quality The TNC Handbook Rules and Regulations y Staff Directory News Other Links of Interest i Agency of Natural Resources GIS Internet Mapping permits grants/loans publications calendar contacts Well Details Date Completed Date Received Driller Well Report Number Tag Comments Town Map Cell Tax Map E911 Address SubDivision Lot Number Owners First Name Owners Last Name Purchaser First Name Purchaser Last Name Well Use Well Reason Drilling Method Well Depth Yield Gallons Per Minute Yield Test Tested For Hours Static Water Level Over Flowing OverBurden Thickness Casing Length Casing Diameter Casing Length Below Land Surface Casing Length Exposed Casing Material Casing Weight Casing Finish Liner Length Liner Diameter Liner Material Liner Weight Grout Type Seal Type Diameter Drilled In Bedrock Depth Drilled in Bedrock Screen Make Type Screen Material 12/20/2010 01 /24/2011 191 David Chevalier Chevalier Drilling Co Inc 43192 43192 South Burlington highland terrace tom hergencother Domestic New Supply 180.00 feet 10.00 1.00 0.00 feet 0 37 feet 39.00 feet 6.00 inches 37.15 feet 1.85 Steel 19.00 Ibs/foot 0.00 feet 0.00 inches 0.00 I bs/foot Clay/Seal Bentonite 0.00 inches 0.00 feet dec home > wsd home Quick Links t> List of Vermont Licensed Well Drillers ?> Well Driller Licensing Rule PDF s> Well Driller License forms >} Current Nationwide Threat Level: Yellow �ti ° S "i� k L P')� W.J" http://www.vermontdrinkingwater.org/cfm/WellReportviewDetails.cfm?id=298927 3/29/2011 Water Supply Division Page 2 of 3 Screen Length 0.00 feet Screen Diameter 0.00 inches Screen Slot Size 0.000 inches Depth of Screen 0.00 feet Gravel Size Type Casing Sealing Method Drive shoe only Yield Test Method Well Development Not Steel Casing 0 Water Analysis 0 Well Screen 0 AW Partial 0 Unique GIS Name SR43192 Lat Degree 44 Lat Minutes 25 Lat Seconds 51.2700 Long Degree 73 Long Minutes 9 Long Seconds 16.5900 Location DeterminationMethod GPS location Well Type bedrock Depth To Liner Top 0.00 Hydro Fractured 0 Hydro Fractured Resulting 0.00 Flow Well Location Submitted As A Dot On A Map Starting Ending Water Lithology Lithology Depth Depth Bearing Code Description 0.00 3.00 D 3.00 13.00 S 13.00 37.00 H 37.00 180.00 limestone If you would like search for a well or wells in a specific area the following link will relocate you to the ANR GIS Internet Mapping Program. http://www.anr.state.vt.us/site/html/maps.htm www.VermontDrinkingWater.org VT DEC:: Water Supply Division:Division:zF 103 South Main Street, Old Pantry Building :,, Waterbury, VT 05671-0403 Telephone toll -free in VT: 800-823-6500 or call 802-241-3400, Fax: 802-241-3284 1W DEC home dec calendar contact dec topic index site map search about dec assistance . divisions & programs 4 dec permits dec regulations „ dec publications dec grants & loans dec maps & GIS hotline numbers related links w Privacy policy ANR home State of Vermont Agencies & Depts. Access Government 24/7 1 About Vermont.Gov Privacy Policy 1, Ask a State Librarian a ? A Vermont Government Website Copyright 2004-2006 State of Vermont - All rights reserved http://www.vermontdrinkingwater.org/cfm/WellReportviewDetails.cfm?id=298927 3/29/2011 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD SD_11 _02_9H ighlandTerrace_OBrien_sketch a #9 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: April 27, 2011 Plans received: March 28, 2011 9 HIGHLAND TERRACE- 4-LOT SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-11-12 Meetina date: Mav 3. 2010 Owner Applicant/Contact Doug & Elaine Maynes Patrick O'Brien Development LLC 464 Lakeview Drive 200 Old Farm Road North Hero VT 05474 South Burlinaton, VT 05403 Property Information Tax Parcel 0850-00009 SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 1.37 acres Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Patrick O'Brien Development, LLC, hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking sketch plan review to subdivide a 1.37 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into four (4) lots ranging in size from 0.17 acres to 0.73 acres, 9 Highland Terrace. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on March 28, 2011 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Neighborhood Residential Zoning District Requirement/Limitation Proposed * Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 7,405 SF * Max. Density-NR 1.2 units/acre base density max of 4/acre with TDR 2.9 units/acre** Max. Building Coverage 15% ** Max. Total Coverage 30% ** Min. Front Setback 30 ft. ** Min. Side Setback 10 ft. ** Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. ** 4 The acreage of the lot will not support a home on each lot as the density will exceed the maximum base density allowed in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. The base density would only support the existing home without the transfer of at least three additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDRs). w► Three of the proposed lots do not meet the minimum lot size requirement. This standard is waivable under PUD provisions. The Board should discuss the request. Staff has no opposition to the request for waiver. ** The application does not propose actual structures. Actual structures will be sited on the lots as part of a zoning permit. This application seeks only to create the lots and general layout for the dwelling units. The concept plan remains within the coverage limitations of the district. 1. Only one dwelling unit shall be permitted on the lots without the transfer of additional development rights, per the stipulations of Article 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The purchase of the development right documents must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to recording the mylar. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the Southeast Quadrant. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Southeast Quadrant District This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district Therefore it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ Zoning District. A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ- NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub- district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. 3. The structures shall not exceed the height limitations of the district. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels The proposed lots would consume the majority of what is already a small lot. There are very little opportunities for open space on this small lot. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable subdistrict allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. The proposed subdivision is in compliance with this criterion with the exception of the density limitations noted above. Additional units may be permitted on the subject lots with the appropriate transfers of development right(s). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. Again, there are no natural areas or open spaces proposed on this small lot. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 4. Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. There are no wetlands or streams on the subject property. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. This criterion is not applicable to this application. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. The preliminary plat plans shall detail the proposed water and sewer connections, which shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and Superintendent of the Water Department. 5. The preliminary plat plans shall detail the proposed water and sewer connections, which shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and Superintendent of the Water Department. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. The City Engineer shall review the plans for compliance with these criteria. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. No additional recreation paths or sidewalks are necessary as part of this application. (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. The Fire Chief shall review the plans. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on of adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. Staff finds no ability or need to serve adjacent properties. (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. There are no new roads proposed. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. There are no new roads proposed. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. This criterion is not applicable in this application. 9.09 SEQ-NR Sub -District S ecific Standards The SEQ-NR sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. The proposed development is too small to warrant such blocks, nor are there any new streets. (2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 400 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). There are no new streets. (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to onstr ct'on tfuture seets is strongly encouraged. There are no opportunities to connect in a meaningful way to adjacent properties. (4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. Lots 3 & 4 do not meet this criterion and it is unclear if Lots 1 or 2 do. The applicant should provide the proposed lot lengths and widths. The Board should discuss this issue. In considering this issue, the Board should weigh the importance of design elements and neighborhood planning with what may be argued as efficient use of land. B. The Board should discuss the applicant's requested waiver of the lot length -width ratio for the lots. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the VR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-3 and 9-4, and Figures 9-8 and 9-9 below. (2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be connected in a pattern that promotes walkability throughout the development. The DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this purpose. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) (4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5). (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. There are no new streets as part of this proposal. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. apply to arterial streets). (Special design guidelines Building plans have not yet been submitted. (2) Building Fagades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed dwelling units. (3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. Buildings should be set back fifteen feet (151) from the back of sidewalk. The applicant has shown building envelopes on the plan which will show that setbacks are being met. However, it is not yet clear what the distance between the building and the street will be. Furthermore, there is no sidewalk from which to measure. The lots are very small, approximately the size of and characteristic of older R4 neighborhoods throughout the City. A single family home on such a lot will be forced into having a close relationship with a street if it is to also meet the 30 foot setback. Staff does not see any reason for concern with relation to this criterion. (4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials. It is unclear if porches, stoops, or balconies are proposed. (5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. Staff recommends that the Board impose this criterion. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON g DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 9. The front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. (6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing types. 10. The Board shall discuss whether they wish to enforce the SEQ residential design criteria on the proposed subdivision. At issue are the width to length ratio of the lots, orientation of the units, proximity of the units to the roadway, and location of garages. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items before proceeding to the preliminary plat level of review. Respectfully submitted, *athyar�LaRose, AICP, ssociate Planner Copy to: Patrick O'Brien, applicant Permit Number SD- 1 V -1 (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW SOUTHEAST QUADRANT All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #)� 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, hone and fax #) �, 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee si bmple, option, etc.) . il/ 5) CO TACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2► 5a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office C3,�'S'`D -- 6000 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General project escription (explain what you want approval for): M 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com b) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use c) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) �A"C' jj 1 l^ S x i G � .� h -_ Cr� 'F �r e „ w 4 ... a i /1 k d) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) e) Proposed height of building (if applicable) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) 9) 9a: SEQ SUBDISTRICT (identify in each) NRP Acreage Units Existing Units proposed NRT cis R _ - VC 9b: Are Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs) being utilized? teS If yes, please identify how many and from which parcel (street address) 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.)_ 11) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing_,,' 7 /o o ° Proposed_ /o _ ,� b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing__' I,- —% Proposed c) Front yard (along each street) Existing Proposed 2 Southeast Quadrant Sketch Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 12) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) 1} 11 �o S „ �,,� I el 13) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). 14) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE n o 15) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by theCity's Land Development � Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17y) of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. I hereby certify that all the information re ested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNAT RE OF APPPLL CANT SIGNAT, E OF PROPEL TIC OWNER Do not write /below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: Ad! v /� I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Inco ple dministrative Of icer Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Southeast Quadrant Sketch Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 ),Oo 3�O v , I I I \ N \ a � N I I 11 i SITE ENGINEER: — 1 \ \ TURE/PREVIOUSLY f. P�RMITTED SMH ICIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOaAVES. INC fOMMBRElDVIEWIANE, SONIHRURLMTOK Vr 05403 FUTUR /PREVIOSULY II \ \ ® PERMIIWD DRILLED = WELLQ I \ JI aorrarcer m zo - JDL \1 \ I \I \ Z II c=cm \ — — DSM m I APPROVED N/F DSM JOHN W & OWNER: fil I PATRICIAA_ — — ' TRUTOR N/F 5/t,4u✓ I PATRICK O'BRIAN I I \ 1 ,PARCEL 2C DEVELOPMENT LLC I ING SETBACK I is (TYP.) DE YARD — N/F \\ \ \I 1 1 I :I r PROJECT: " THADDEUS \ \ 1 \ I McDOUGAL_ �zT �� II 30' cTYP> LOT 4 � !� � \ MAYNES YA fQ¢ I 1 \\\— — — I I I 1 I 0.17A�. I I) N�� PROPERTY z < - 7,505 fiF. I SUBIVISION UY � , I �� r> / ya�y�y / I t I 3 �I 1 �v I I LOT 3 I oU 10 _ J 10 I a DOUGLAS 1 9 HIGHLAND TERRACE G ` I I I I ypR r SOUTH BURLINGTON, — - = � � \ W. MAYNES 1 t \ ExisnNc 0 M - \ I T J \ I ;A I 0.21 AC. ER� aco / DNrvewaY VERMONT 1 1 r \ LOT 2 I'- 9,173 SF. _ 0.26AC. I \s_. \ 11495.95 LOT 1 �� I. �/� I i� I j SOON K\�' 10.73 AC. I c I 1 / , MIKYUNGKWON P� v A 11 I i 1, 889 SF. I' I I // 1 I /'.� 0 a EXISONG DRIVEWAY q LISAK. MALLr-Y \ I ' \ I POTEN EXISTING \ _ 1i 1 — — 1 `, 1 LOCATION MAP 1 \ 1 \ I WELL = 2000 POTENTIAL DRIVEWAYS I \ \\ ACK i�7\ I DATE Cne m REVISION YARD SETS 199.3' _ _ '—'��{� (TYP.) l.� _. DRIVEWAY'. I � � � ' � " / N/F \ \ 3se---- EXISTINGZwOo A, 338 PROPCI CONTOU I \ TERRACE HIGHLAND /,N��ej — = = APPR6XIMATE PROPERTY E 1 - / `✓" / NOTES — APPROXIMATE SETBACK NE \ 2 / v / / O R�. PIN FOUND �, J 1. Utilities shown do not purport to constitute\or represent all utilities located —SS— GRAVITY SEWER LINE SK T Ei \ — t EXISnNC \ \ — —� I I discrepancies shall be reported to the Engineer, The Contractor shall contact Dig — —W — \ ATER LINE upon or adjacent to the surveyed premises. Existing utility locations are approximate only. The Contractor shall field verify all utility conflicts. All DRIVEWAY ` V I —�-'�" I Safe 888 344-7233 nor to an construction "�' — —OE — 0 HEAD ELECTRIC i J l el \,\ I oP Y p on is pp 4d,based on existing P 1 j��y(;� NIF 1; a June�l0,t o andTNer ganlSs not apreepared bs Ac land Consulting, n tended d dated �e --- - 1 \ \ I 1 I Information and a Ian entitled "Surveyand Subdivision of The Lands of — —UE-7— UN RGROUND �FLE�CTRI A�is"1A�y0,I EDWARD S�& I P r survey used ®/ SEWE NH0LE II�i At 6 ELIZABETH D as one. POWER D4E I N/F \ I 3. Ve? ical datum based on Chittenden County Lidar Information and hq(zontal HORTON p1 \ I j / datum /based on the Vermont State Plan Coordinate System. i DECIDU $ TREE naxe nnanNc NoyeaR "5 FRANK H. ��ADOWSKI� _ CONIFERO TREE MAR_, 2011 \ GRAPHIC SCALE i ..� EDGE OF 6RUSH/WOODS I sca e DRAINAGE/ ALE /� i ill = 20' m�b WELL I s \" I PROJ. N0. = 2q ft. / 11130