Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0025 Harbor View RoadVi -`w � b a A - VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD q-�aj"-Vn Va D 10 V.S.A. Ch. 151g Re: John Larkin, Inc. Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11R(2)-EB [861] FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND REMAND ORDER John Larkin, Inc. (Applicant) appeals the denial of its application for a permit to build a 6-story tall, 1 13-room elderly housing building, with associated parking and utilities, to be built on a 7.03-acre tract located between Spear Street and Route 7/Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont (Project). As set forth below, the Environmental Board concludes that the Project complies with Criterion 8(aesthetics), and remands to the District 4 Environmental Commission for a decision on Criterion 1(B). I. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY On December 18, 2003, the District 4 Environmental Commission (Commission) issued Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order #4C0526-11 (Decision) denying a land use permit for the Project on Criterion 8(aesthetics), and deferring decision on Criterion 1(B). On January 16, 2004, the Applicant filed a request to reconsider, and on March 11, 2004, the Commission issued Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order #4C0526-11 R (Reconsidered Decision), again denying the application for the Project. On August 19, 2004, the Applicant filed a second request to reconsider, and on October 19, 2004, the Commission issued Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order #4C0526-11 R(2) (Second Reconsidered Decision, together with the Decision and Reconsidered Decision collectively referred to as the Commission Decisions), again denying a land use permit for the Project. On November 5, 2004, the Applicant filed this appeal with the Environmental Board (Board) from the Decision alleging error with respect to Criteria 1(B)(waste disposal) and 8(aesthetics)(10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(1)(B) and 6086(a)(8)). On December 9, 2004, Board Chair Patricia Moulton Powden convened a prehearing conference with the following participants: the Applicant, by Carl Lisman, Esq.; Martha Lang; and the South Burlington Planning Commission, by JuliBeth Hinds. Before the prehearing conference, the Harbor Heights Homeowners' Association (HHHA) notified the Board that it was unable to attend but wished to participate as a party in this matter. No other person expressed an interest in participating in this matter. The Chair issued a Prehearing Conference Report and Order (PCRO) on December 14, 2004. Among other things, the PCRO identified the parties and issues on appeal, set the matter for hearing, and set deadlines for prefiling evidence. Re: John Larkin, Inu. Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11 R(2)-EB [861 ] Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 2 On April 1, 2005, the Chair issued a Chair's Dismissal Order for failure to meet filing deadlines. On April 7, 2005, the Applicant filed an objection and a request to continue. The Board deliberated on April 13, 2005. On April 22, 2005, the Board issued a Memorandum of Decision granting the Applicant's request to continue, and rescheduled the hearing in this matter. On July 27, 2005, the Board convened a public hearing and site visit in South Burlington, Vermont, Chair Moulton Powden presiding. Christina Jensen, Esq., represented the Applicant, and Rebecca Stearns represented HHHA. Also present were John Larkin, and the Applicant's witnesses Michele Dufresne and William Nedde. HHHA's Motion to Substitute witness Rebecca Stearns for Amy Roth was granted. The Board made observations on the record, admitted evidence and heard testimony. At the hearing, the Applicant requested that the Board provide partial review on Criterion 8(aesthetics). No other party objected to the Applicant's request, and the Board granted this request at the hearing. On August 17, 2005 and September 28, 2005, the Board deliberated. Based on the record, related argument, and the parties' proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Board declared the record complete and adjourned. II. OFFICIAL NOTICE The Vermont Administrative Procedures Act authorizes the Board to take official notice of judicially cognizable facts in contested cases such as Act 250 appeals. 3 V.S.A. § 810(4); see also, 3 V.S.A. § 801(b)(2)(contested cases). According to the Vermont Rules of Evidence, "[a] judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is ... capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned." V.R.E. 201(b); see also, 3 V.S.A. § 810(1)(rules of evidence apply in contested cases); In re Handy, 144 Vt. 610, 612 (1984). Official notice may be taken whether requested or not and may be taken at any stage of the proceeding, 3 V.S.A. § 810(4); In re Nelson Lyford, Declaratory Ruling #341, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 3-4 (Dec. 24, 1997)(citing V.R.E. 201(c) and (f)). At the hearing, the Applicant agreed that it would be appropriate for the Board to take official notice of the City of South Burlington City Plan and the City of South Burlington Zoning Ordinance, but objected to official notice being taken the Commission Decisions, at least insofar as they concerned the Commission's findings on aesthetics and clear, written community standards. The Board took official notice of the City of South Burlington City Plan and the City of South Burlington Zoning Ordinance, and the Applicant filed these documents after the hearing. Re: John Larkin, Inc. Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11 R(2)-EB [861) Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 3 The Board now takes official notice of the Commission Decisions, for the purpose of procedural background facts only. The objection raised at the hearing by the Applicant was based on the de novo nature of this appeal, and was entirely proper in the context of Criterion 8(aesthetics), since the Board cannot rely on prior decisions as evidence of facts that might be in dispute. See also In re Killington, Ltd., 159 Vt. 206, 214 (1992)(citing In re Green Peak Estates, 154 Vt. 363, 372 (1990)). However, the Board is not relying on the Commission Decisions as evidence of any fact in dispute, but rather for procedural facts that are not subject to dispute. As discussed below, the procedural background in this case has direct bearing on the issues the Board has jurisdiction to decide in this appeal. Official notice is, therefore, appropriate. III. ISSUES; REMAND The issues raised in the Applicant's notice of appeal, and identified in the Prehearing Conference Report and Order are: Whether the Project complies with 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(1)(B). 2. Whether the Project complies with the aesthetics requirements of 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(8)(aesthetics). At the hearing, the Board granted the Applicant's request for partial review and decision on Criterion 8(aesthetics), pursuant to EBR 21. However, it appears from the Commission Decisions that the Commission did not decide the Criterion 1(B) issue. The Board's jurisdiction in this appeal, therefore, is limited to Criterion 8(aesthetics). See In re Taft Corners Assocs., 160 Vt. 583, 591 (1993)(Board has no jurisdiction to rule on criteria that were not ruled on by the district commission)(citing In re Vermont Gas Systems, 150 Vt. 34, 40 (1988)). Accordingly, this matter must be remanded to the Commission for a decision on Criterion 1(B). IV. FINDINGS OF FACT To the extent that any proposed findings of fact are included in this decision, they are granted; otherwise, they are denied. See Secretary, Agency of Natural Resources v. Upper Valley Regional Landfill Corp., 167 Vt. 228, 241-242 (1997); Petition of Village of Hardwick Electric Department, 143 Vt. 437, 445 (1983). Facts stated and terms defined in the procedural summary are incorporated herein. The Applicant proposes to build a 6-story tall, 1 13-room elderly housing building, with associated parking and utilities, on a 7.03-acre tract located between Spear Street and Route 7 (Shelburne Road), on the north side of Harbor View Drive, in South Burlington, Vermont. I Re: John Larkin, lnL,. Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11 R(2)-EB [861 ] Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 4 2. The building will be 59 feet 6 inches tall from the first floor to the roof peak, with the front door at grade level. The building will be 62 feet in width and approximately 332 feet in length. 3. The general topography of the area slopes downward from east to west 4. Harbor View Drive contains a mix of commercial, multi -family and single- family residential properties, with the multi -family properties providing a buffer between the commercial uses to the west, along Shelburne Road, and the single-family residential uses to the east, along the west side of Spear Street. 5. The land between the commercial and residential areas is currently dominated by multifamily and senior housing. 6. The Pillsbury South Community Care Center is located across Harbor View Drive from the Project site. That building is about 284 feet in length and three stories tall. Harborview Senior Housing is also across Harbor View Drive from the Project site, and is about 170 feet long and four stories in height. The Project will be connected to these existing senior housing facilities by footpaths and sidewalks. 7. Another senior housing building, Allenwood, is located just south of Harbor View Drive, on Allen Road. Allenwood is approximately 434 feet long and four stories in height. 8. There are several hotels on Shelburne Road, in the vicinity of the Project site. The Smart Suites, Howard Johnson's and Main Stay Suites are each four stories tall. The Holiday Inn is three stories tall. 9. There is no five- or six -story -tall building in the area of the Project site. The Project would be the first six -story -tall building in South Burlington. 10. There is a bank of mature trees on the northern border of the Project site. Some of these trees are as tall as the proposed building, and a few of these trees are taller than the proposed building. 11. The proposed building has three sections, connected at angles to give the building a concave shape. This minimizes the appearance of length. Measuring straight across from end to end, the building will be approximately 276 feet long. 12. The building is set into the bank and tree line, which minimizes its appearance. Re: John Larki,., ,nc. Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11 R(2)-EB [861 ] Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 5 13. This location and positioning of the building on the Project site minimizes the visual impact of the building and preserves some views of Lake Champlain and the Adirondack Mountains from Harbor View Drive. 14. The building materials for the Project include forest green asphalt shingles and vinyl siding in earth tones, with white window trim and door frames. 15. The architectural design of the building includes corners, overhangs, and other details, proportionate to the building's size, that are designed to draw the eye from the building's mass. Sun rooms and decks also break up the building's appearance of length and add visual interest. 16. The sixth -floor rooms and suites are within the roof, making the building appear to be somewhat lower than six stories in height. 17. The Applicant proposes landscaping around the Project site, including native plants to provide flowers and seasonal changes of foliage. The parking area will be screened by lilacs and small trees, decreasing in height from north to south, to limit their impact on views from Harbor View Drive. 18. The building will be visible to users of public ways such as nearby roads, sidewalks and Lake Champlain. 19. Because of trees and buildings closer to Shelburne Road and the relative topographical differences between Shelburne Road and the building site, the building will be visible behind existing roof lines and trees from Shelburne Road at its intersection with Collins Boulevard. 20. The building will be partially visible from the intersection of Harbor Ridge Road and Bay Crest Drive. 21. Small sections of the roof will be visible between houses on the west side of Spear Street from Allen Road about half way to Pheasant Way. 22. The building will not be visible from the corner of Bay Crest Drive, or the municipal Overlook Park on Spear Street. 23. The Project will be somewhat visible from Shelburne Point, and is likely to be more visible from more proximate parts of Lake Champlain. 24. The building will be visible from some of the Harbor Heights condominium units immediately to the east of the Project site. From this Re: John Larkin, Inu . Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11 R(2)-EB [861 ] Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 6 location, approximately the top five stories of the proposed building will be visible. 25. Units 702, 703 and 704, and 801, 802, 803 and 804 of the Harbor Heights condominiums have westerly views of the Adirondack mountains and Shelburne Bay of Lake Champlain. These views will be obstructed by the Project. 26. The Project will block westerly views from the Harbor Heights condominiums if it is any higher than two -and -one-half or three stories high. The obstruction is the same whether a four-story or six -story building is constructed. 27. The Applicant previously had proposed to reduce the length of the building by approximately 18 feet, but no longer wishes to do this. This would mitigate the impact on the westerly views of the Harbor Heights condominium owners, but would result in a loss to the Applicant of six units with good views of Lake Champlain and the Adirondack mountains to the west. 28. The Applicant does not want to reduce the length of the building to maintain most of the views from the affected Harbor Heights condominiums for economic reasons. 29. Reduction of the length of the building as previously proposed will not have a significant impact on views from any public right of way. It would reduce views of the Project slightly from Shelburne Road/Route 7 and Lake Champlain. 30. The Project will involve clearing a small amount of tall trees to the south of Collins Boulevard, southeast of the Project building, which will broaden the views to the west slightly for some of the Harbor Heights condominium units in the 800 series. 31. The City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations, Section 25.113, limit building height in the Project's zoning district to 40 feet. 32. The City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations, Section 25.113(b), authorize height increases up to 45 feet for residential structures, under certain circumstances. The Project is not considered a residential use under the City of Burlington Zoning Regulations. It is congregate housing, which is not listed as a residential use in Appendix D. 33. The City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations, Section 25.113(c) authorize the development review board to approve heights over 40 feet Re: John LarkL, inc. t Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11 R(2)-EB [861 ] Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 7 for non-residential structures if the taller structure: "(i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; [and] (ii) will not detract from important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way." 34. The City of South Burlington granted the Applicant's request for a waiver of the height limit, with corresponding setback increases, to allow a building approximately 67 feet in height. 35. The Applicant has since reduced the height of the building to 59 feet and 6 inches. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Applicant proposes to build a 113-unit, 6-story tall, elderly housing building, with associated parking and utilities. Under Criterion 8(aesthetics), the Board must determine whether the Project has or will have "an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area [or] aesthetics," with or without a screening row of trees or other mitigating conditions. 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(8) (aesthetics). The HHHA bears the burden of proving noncompliance with Criterion 8, id. § 6088(b), but the Applicant must produce sufficient evidence for the Board to make affirmative findings. Re: The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Ann Juster and Homer and Ruth Sweet, #1 R0048-12-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 31 (Aug. 20, 2001)(citing Re. Black River Valley Rod & Gun Club, Inc., #2S1019-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order (Altered) at 19 (Jun. 12, 1997)). To determine whether a project complies with Criterion 8 (aesthetics), the Board applies a two-part test, known as the Quechee test. The first question is whether the project fits in aesthetically with its surroundings. Re: Barre Granite Quarries, LLC, #7C1079 (Revised)-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 78 (Dec. 8, 2000)(citing Re. James E. Hand and John R. Hand, d/b/a Hand Motors and East Dorset Partnership, #8B0444-6-EB (Revised), Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 24-25 (Aug. 19, 1996); Re: Quechee Lakes Corp., #3W0411-EB and #3W0439-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order (Nov. 4, 1985)). If a project fits its context, it does not have an adverse effect, and complies with Criterion 8(aesthetics). Re: John J. Flynn Estate and Keystone Development Corp., #4C0790-EB, Findings of Fact Conclusions of Law, and Order (May 4, 2004). If a project does not fit the aesthetic context of its surroundings, it has an adverse aesthetic impact, and the Board must determine whether that adverse effect is undue. Barre Granite, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 79 (citing Hand, Re: John Larkin, 4 Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11R(2)-EB [861] Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 8 Findings, Conclusions and Order at 24; Quechee Lakes, Findings, Conclusions and Order, at 17-20). 1. Adverse Impact: Does the Proiect Fit its Surroundings? To determine whether a development fits in with its context, or whether it has an adverse aesthetic impact, the Board considers a variety of factors, including: What is the nature of the project's surroundings? Is the project to be located in an urban, suburban, village, rural or recreational resort area? What land uses presently exist? What is the topography like? What structures exist in the area? What vegetation is prevalent? noes the area have particular scenic values? 2. Is the project's design compatible with its surroundings? Is the architectural style of the buildings compatible with other buildings in the area? Is the scale of the project appropriate to its surroundings? Is the mass of structures proposed for the site consistent with land use and density patterns in the vicinity? 3. Are the colors and materials selected for the project suitable for the context within which the project will be located? 4. Where can the project be seen from? Will the project be in the viewer's foreground, middleground or background? Is the viewer likely to be stationary so that the view is of long duration, or will the viewer be moving quickly by the site so that the length of view is short? 5. What is the project's impact on open space in the area? Will it maintain existing open areas, or will it contribute to a loss of open space? Re: J. Philip Gerbode, #6F0396R-EB, Findings of fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 11 (Mar. 25, 1991); see also, Re: James E. Hand and John R. Hand, d/b/a Hand Motors and East Dorset Partnership, #8B0444-6-EB (Revised), Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 25 (Aug. 19, 1996)(factors to be considered include: a. the nature of the project's surroundings; b. the compatibility of the project's design with those surroundings; c. the suitability for the project's context of the colors and materials selected for the project; d. the locations from which the project can be viewed; and e. the potential impact of the project on open space). Re: John Larks nc. Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11 R(2)-EB [861 ] Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 9 Criterion 8 was not intended to prevent all change to the landscape of Vermont or to guarantee that the view a person sees from his or her property will remain the same forever. Change must and will come, and Criterion 8 will not be an impediment. Criterion 8 was intended to insure that as development does occur, reasonable consideration will be given to the visual impacts on neighboring landowners, the local community, and on the specific resources of Vermont. Re: Okemo Mountain Inc., #2W5051-8-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 9 (Dec. 18, 1986); and see Main Street Landing Co., #401068-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 17-18 (Nov. 20, 2001). While a built environment is not always adverse, projects that result in the loss of open space and the alteration of vistas can have an adverse effect on aesthetics and scenic beauty. Re: Thomas W. Bryant and John P. Skinner, #4C0795-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 21 (Jun. 26, 1991). See also Re: Maple Tree Place Associates, #4))775-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 48-49 (Jun. 25, 1998), Re: George, Mary and Rene Boissoneault, #6F0499-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 19 (Jan. 29, 1998). The Project building will be the first six -story -high building in South Burlington. Although, as discussed below, there is considerable aesthetic mitigation proposed, the Project will be visible from public and private locations, and the building will block the views of the Adirondacks and Shelburne Bay from several nearby condominium units. The Project could be considered an infill development because it is in a commercial area and adjacent to a developed residential area, but it is clear that the Project will have an adverse impact on open space. Based on these facts, the Board concludes that the Project will have an adverse aesthetic impact. 2. Is the Impact Unduly Adverse? Because the Project has some adverse aesthetic impact on the surrounding area, the Board must determine whether that impact is unduly adverse. Barre Granite, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 79 (citing Hand, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 24; Quechee Lakes, Findings, Conclusions and Order, at 17-20). As set forth below, the Board concludes that the Project, as conditioned, does not have an unduly adverse aesthetic impact. An aesthetic impact is unduly adverse if any of the following is true: The project violates a clear, written community standard intended to preserve the aesthetics or scenic beauty of the area; Re: John Larkin, A Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11 R(2)-EB [861 ] Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 10 2. The project offends the sensibilities of the average person because it is out of character with its surroundings or significantly diminishes the scenic qualities of the area; or 3. The applicant has failed to take generally available mitigating steps which a reasonable person would take to improve the harmony of the project with its surroundings. See Black River at 19-20; Hand at 25-29; Quechee Lakes at 19-20. a. Clear, Written Community Standard An adverse aesthetic impact is undue if, among other things, it violates a clear, written community standard intended to preserve the aesthetics or scenic beauty of the area. Home Depot, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 31 (citations omitted). "In evaluating whether a project violates a clear written community standard, the Board routinely looks to town and regional plans, open land studies, and other municipal -generated documents to discern whether a clear, written community standard exists and should be applied in the review of the aesthetic impacts of a project." Re: McDonald's Corporation, No. 100012-2B-EB, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 14 (Mar. 22, 2001)(citing Re: Herbert and Patricia Clark, #1 R0785-EB, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 35- 37 (Apr. 3, 1997); Re: Thomas W. Bryant and John P. Skinner d/b/a J. O. T. O. Associates, #4C0795-EB, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 22 (June 26, 1991); see also, Re: Nile and Julie Duppstadt, #4C1013 (corrected)-EB, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 23 (Apr. 30, 1999)). In this case, the City of South Burlington's zoning regulations set a 40-foot height limit in the Project's zoning district. A height restriction in a zoning ordinance has been held to constitute a clear, written community standard intended to preserve the aesthetics or scenic beauty of the area. See, e.g., Re: The Mirkwood Group, #1 R0780-EB, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 14-15 (Aug. 19, 1996)(35-foot height limit); Re: Northshore Development, Inc., #4C0626-5-EB, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 8 (Dec. 29, 1988)(35-foot height limit). Although the height limit can be construed as a clear, written community standard, the zoning regulations also set clear criteria for waiving that standard, and those criteria were met in this case because the Project does not have an adverse impact on the essential character of the neighborhood or zoning district, and because it will not detract from any important scenic view from adjacent public roadways or other public rights -of way. Therefore, the Project does not violate any clear, written community standard intended to protect aesthetic values in the area. Re: John Lark nc. Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-11 R(2)-EB [861 ] Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 11 b. Mitigation The question under this part of the Quechee test is whether there are generally available mitigating steps that have or should be taken to improve the harmony of the project with its surroundings. See Bryant and Skinner, Findings, Conclusions and Order at 22 (reasonable aesthetic mitigation for subdivision project includes height and exterior color restrictions on homes, plantings to screen the development, covenants to govern future activities on the site and retained open space all comprised). As set forth in the findings, the Applicant proposes a variety of aesthetic mitigation measures, including setting the Project building into the bank, keeping most of the trees and adding landscaping, using compatible colors and material, adding architectural features to break up the apparent mass of the building, an eight -inch height reduction and location of the sixth story in the roof, and keeping some of the parking underground. The Board concludes that the Applicant has taken all generally available mitigating steps. C. Shocking and Offensive The question under this part of the Quechee test is whether the Project offends the sensibilities of the average person, and whether the Project would be so out of character with its surroundings or so significantly diminish the scenic qualities of the area as to be offensive or shocking to the average person. Re: Pike Industries, Inc., #1 R0807-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 18-19 (Jun. 25, 1998); OMYA, Inc., #9A0107-2-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 37 (May 25, 1999), aff'd OMYA, Inc. v. Town of Middlebury, No. 99-282 (Jul. 26, 2000). The Board concludes that the Project, as conditioned above, is not shocking or offensive and does not offend the sensibilities of the average person. The Project complies with Criterion 8(aesthetics). VI. ORDER The Board takes official notice of the South Burlington City Plan, the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance, and the Commission Decisions. 2. The Project, as conditioned, complies with Criterion 8(aesthetics). 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commission for a decision on Criterion 1(B). Re: John Larkin, M Land Use Permit Application #4C0526=11 R(2)-EB [861 ] Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order Page 12 DATED at Montpelier, Vermont this 11t" day of October, 2005. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD A(�a9- Patricia Moulton Powden, Chair George Holland W. William Martinez Patricia Nowak` Karen Paul Richard C. Pembroke, Sr. A. Gregory Rainville * Board member Patricia Nowak was unable to participate in the Board's deliberations on September 28, 2005, but has reviewed and joins in this decision. TTERSTarkinTCO.doc CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 11th day of October, 2005, a copy of the foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Remand Order regarding John Larkin, Inc. Application #4C0526-11 R(2)-EB [Docket #861], and survey forms to parties only were sent by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid to the following: John Larkin, Inc., by Carl H. Lisman, Esq. Lisman, Webster, Kirkpatrick & Leckerling, P.C. PO Box 728 Burlington, VT 05402 Juli Beth Hinds Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Harbor Heights Homeowners Association c/o Amy Roth 33 Harbor View Road #702 South Burlington, VT 05403 FOR INFORMATION ONLY Peter Kiebel, Coordinator Dist. #4 Env. Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Martha Lang 138 Colchester Avenue Burlington, VT 05401 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite f206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Esq. ANR, Center Bldg. 103 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 'It/tc.,tt-tta Victoria Lory Administrative Secretary F:\Victoria\C S\larkin.wpd State of Vermont WASTEWATER SYSTEM and POTABLE A LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules Effective August 16, 2002 Case Number: WW-4-1742 PIN: EJ02-0236 Landowner: John Larkin, Inc. Address: 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 This proj ect, consists of constructing a 113 room elderly housing proj ect (70 one bedroom units and 43 two bedroom units - a maximum of 2 people in the two bedroom units), with 15 employees on a 7.03 acre parcel utilizing municipal water and sewer services. The proj ect is located off Harbor View Road in the city of South Burlington, Vermont, and is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This permit does not constitute approval under Act 250. 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry - phone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 658-2199, the Vermont Department of Health - phone (802) 863-7220, and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: Project 00127; "Lakeview at Pillsbury"; Site Plan; Dated April 16, 2002; Last revised August 6, 2002; Details; D-1; Dated April 16, 2002; Last revised July 18, 2002; Details; D-2; Dated April 16, 2002; Last revised October 15, 2002; Details; D-3; Dated April 16, 2002; Last revised July 17, 2002; Details; D-4; Dated April 16, 2002; Last revised July 18, 2002; Details; D-5; Dated April 16, 2002; Last revised October, 15, 2002. 3. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 4. No alterations to the building other than those indicated on the approved plan or Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit, which would change or affect the exterior water supply, or wastewater disposal, or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Division of Wastewater Management. Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit W W-4-1742 Page 2 Each prospective purchaser of the lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plans and this Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. 6. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations, with this permit. 7. In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and be subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. The conditions of this permit shall nin with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the city of South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. POTABLE WATER SUPPLY 9. The project/ lot is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system as depicted on the approved plans. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. 10. The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Agency ofNatural Resources, Water Supply Division's "Public Water System Permit to Constrict " Project # E-1367 & WSID # 5091. Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit W W-4-1742 Page 3 WASTEWATER SYSTEM 11. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by connection to the Bartlett Bay municipal wastewater system as depicted on the approved plans. The proj ect is approved for a maximum of 11,640 gallons of wastewater per day. No other method of wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. 12. A professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont, is to generally supervise the construction of the sanitary sewer line extensions and, upon completion of construction, the supervising engineer is to submit to the Wastewater Management Division a written certification stating all construction has been completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans. The engineer's certification is to be submitted to the Division prior to the occupancy of anyunit and the certification shall include, but not be limited to, the results of all leakage testing performed on each segment of the sanitary sewer extension and all manholes, as described in the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 1, Appendix A. 13. This permit issued by the Wastewater Management Division shall be valid for a substantially completed potable water supply and wastewater system upon receipt by the Division of a certification from a designer or installer, signed and dated, that states: "I hereby certify that the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional j udgment, the potable water supply and wastewater system have been installed in accordance with the permitted design and all permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfullymet those performance tests." This shall include the shared water supply system, and wastewater collection and delivery system for the project Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit W W-4-1742 Page 3 13. Any conversion of the building which will change the use or conditions approved in this permit, shall be subject to review by this office for an increase in design flow. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 10th day of September, 2003. 16 Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By illiam abiloski Assistant Regional Engineer South Burlington Planning Commission & Selectboard Water Supply Division Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Act 250 Coordinator - Peter Keilbel Pillsbury Manor A New Horizon. in Senior Living October 14, 2003 Innovative Design Michelle Dufresne 30 Kimball Ave. S. Burlington, VT 05403 Re, Delivery schedules for .new Pillsbury Manor project Dear Michelle; Concerning The delivery sehedife att the new Pillsbury Manty Project, i think the adjoining residents will find the delivery schedules to be much thz- same as the adjacent properties of Pillsbury Manor South, Allenwood, and HarborView Apartments. Once the project is up and running, and the residents move in, the facility will require few deliveries beyond Ibod. A commercial kitchen feeding our residents will require food deliveries, perhaps as many as 5 tractor trailers per week from major suppliers making their round of (Ieiveries. Additionally, delivery trucks in the 1 ton van sized vehicles, will deliver bread, mill:, coffee, fish, and other specialty items, as many as 5-7 additional stops per week. The tlmin:; for all these will be throughout the day from 7A M to 5 PM. All the deliveries require signal ures, and the products need to be put away in refrigeration, so they are only delivered during normal business hours. And we don't wish to disturb our residents, who themselves may be sleeping at early hours. Trash haulers will pick up trash 2 times per week and recyclable, once per week. We've have not had any experience with trash haulers coming at odd hours. We have specifically instnicted them not to be too early so as to awake our residentq. Any r.-t,ier service technicians generally have residential vans or pickup tricks. Mail service is daily, but Fedex and UPS do make stops, as they do anywhere. Fire and ambulance service will approx innate the frequency of Allenwood, which may average once a week. We operate like any residential facility. The small amount of '.r2 ffic we do generate is reduced by our own 12 passenger van, which pools many residents for routine trips to banks, grocery stores, etc. We anticipate as many as 30-50 % of the residents to have their own vehicles, although the usage is small. if you have any further questions, call me. Sincerely, A��� William . Spalding Administrator 1530 Williston Road 20 Harbor Vicw Read Sowh Budiugluu, VT 05403 South Burlington. VT 05403 (802) 863-2386 RAX (802) 863-9728 (802) 863-7897 2-d d9S:10 60 bT -zoo Oct 14 03 10:45a Innovative Design Inc 802 658 4619 p.2 Michelle Dufresne, Arch. 30 Kimball Ave., Suite 101 Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 658-4909 Innovative Design Inc. October 14, 2003 District Commission Mr. Peter Keibel, District Coordinator RE: Application #4C0526-1 l Hearing Recess Order 10 V.S.A. 6001-6092(Act 250) John Larkin, Inc. On October 13, 2003, we flew a balloon from the building stake that locates the South West corner of the building closest to Harbor Heights Condominiums. We felt that comer would be the most visible from most locations. We went up to the intersection of Spear Street and Allen Road and could not see the balloon due to the large pine located on the corner. We went back down Allen Road heading west approximately 30' from the intersection and we could see the balloon. The view taken from Location BB represents this location. Continuing along Allen Road we could catch glimpses of the balloon between the mature growth and houses. From there we turned around and proceeded north on Spear Street. Traveling in our vehicle we had to carefully look between houses and trees to try to see the balloon, about 300' to 400' up from the intersection you couldn't see it anymore because of the trees and developments. We stopped and parked at Overlook Park and could not see the balloon. Then we proceed west on Pheasant Way to Harbor Ridge. View AA represents this intersection. With the mature trees and houses at the level of the intersection, we could not see the balloon. We proceeded south on to Harbor Ridge Road toward Bay Crest Drive we could not see the balloon. We got out of the vehicle and continued south on Harbor Ridge road and walked along the dirt road to the water tower, there we saw the balloon again. We went back along Harbor Ridge Road and went west on to Bay Crest Drive by foot. We could not see the balloon again until we started to approach Harbor View Road. Attached please find the photos mentioned above. Sincerely, 104, LA-111— is elle Dufresne Duly and Authorized Agent 'AMR fY '�. . a, � i,� 4.:�i` Jr _ 'Y.'• ti. 7 ice'-��T� . . �ry�� ! � v .. i r - ' �• k =. i r c f ie• - .ti �T � 3 A :;r M ,. a r 06/07/2002 09:04 902t21932 KESSEL DUFF PAGE 311/02 Innovative Design Inc. 30 Kimball Ave., Suite 101 $9. 13urlingion, Vt. 05403 Phone: (802) 658-4909 April 16, '21002 0, Mr. Ray Belair Zoning Administrator 11 City of South BurlinZ6 South Burlington, Veont 05403 Dear Ray: it Please find enclosed 4� application for Site Plan Review for Lakeview Pillsbury. We are proposing to b{ ild a 6-story, 113 unit Senior Housing project. The property fronts Harbor View Road in South Jji�rlington directly behind Holiday Suites, within the C2 district Congregate li' sing is permitted a cordidonal use within this district. I t.proyides.o� transition between residential properties to the commercial uses on Route 7. e buildit* with a large mass, in the residential use is consistent with the adjacent 'd thek use s senior housing will have minimal traffic impact, sited , ng the natural topography and embankment at the rear of the site, against a !N: s red CS the visual impact from Harbor View Road, The building is located 146' off -of-way Road i arbordVie t O'Joctiori26.05o�iMeCity orBurlington Zoning Regulations! a. The c4�placity of existing or planned municipal or education facilities will be mininially affected since the project is a senior housing project. I b. The character of the neighborhood would not be affected since this project iy a sirnilaj use to those of adjacent properties. e. il Traffl impact would be minimally affected since it is a senior housing project. d- This P11jact Lq in conformance for C2 district and with South Burlington's master plan. e. With *e southern exposure and expanse of glass this building will help with solar renew4ble energy. With the layout of the building we have maximized the "green i space"j is f. This PlOject helps with the continuing need of housing while providing a safe and social .0mmunity for South Burlington's seniors. . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06/07/2002 09:04 862e-621932 KESSEL DUFF PAGE 02/02 April 16, 2002 Page 2 We are requesting a ver to the height of the building. The compact single footprint of 6-stories minimizes the site im` ct, creating more "green space, while achieving economic liability of the project. Under section 25.113, of the City of South Burlington Zoning .Regulations: i. This ii0ding will not affect the essential character of the neighborhood or district becau a it is sited in along the natural topography of the land This building is only one st ry higher than Harbor View, and blends in with it's surrounding area. With the cx sting canopy of trees surrounding the back and sides of the building the visual impa' : will be minimal. This tailding will not detract firorn. important scenic views from the adjacent public road ; ys or ether public -rights -of -ways because we have maximized the set back distant ,e fronn Harbor View Road while addressing the natural topography of the site, Under section 25.113.1 The allowable difference of 35,75'. � making our set back re We feel our project wi seniors in South Burlit Sincerely, LI/ Itk. V4 Micbelle Duii-esne,RA I, I sight of a building is 35'. The proposed building height is 70.75' making a Ling requires an increase of front and rear to be one foot for every foot, Arement 66' rain. Our actual set back; at the worse case is 118'. be an asset to the community by increasing the housing opportunities for Permit Number SP-h �2 CITY OF SOUTH BUF LINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW City Of S0. Fur` t All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide tie 9 requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) John P. Larkin, Inc., 410 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-864-7444 fax 864-0649 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) Vol 219, Page 360 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) same as owner 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) William H. Nedde III X.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, 164 Main St., Suite 201. Colchester, VT 05446 802 878-0375 fax 878-9618 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS Lot 10, Harbor View Road, South Burlington, VT 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0780-00025-C 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Vacant b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Senior Housing project c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Living space = 21,437 &E Porch 2,556 s.E Canopy 440 s.E d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) 70.75' from pre -construction average grade of 221.25 The building will have 6 floors plus under ground parking e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 113 Elderlylg units f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees):Dayshift =12 full time and 4 part-time; Evening shift = 3 full time; 1 company van g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Bartlett Brook Overlay District. 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 7.8 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 4.1 % Proposed 26.3 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 4.7 % Proposed 4.7 % 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (Including interior renovations): $ 8,000,000 b) Landscaping: $ 40,000 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Road, sidewalk, curb, storm, sewer, water and lighting = $100,000.1 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC (See Traffic Report) a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 180 (estimated) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 61 c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 61 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 4-6 pm 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Weekends 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 2003 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I " x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A) 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge._ DA SIGNATME OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 3 O MATCH SHEET 59 0720 , 0 00027 • LOORO n Z --/!,� o,- vi - (� . n AMO --- a c F_- R °7• Z CA Z Na< mz1330 0015 00 Z �. _ II A 0 (1) 12 _ 90D _ _ I ;1 OORO Z ---- ~� N- _ - 1410 I 1 ^ ]O WATER SEW'tR MID D_ SWW_ 000016 '\ '/ ^ EASEMENT —��- '\ fi`^ 00017I Lam_ x; i _.._- I -rC \ \ •`\`, 0960 0960 00G017 00Q19 R � n p (� KEARI LANE S1i % 096o KEARI LANE " 309' j 387 S� �N 24 0960 0960 D 1 �y0f 0150 3 3 303 0960 00�4 002 0010 00900R08 00006 00004 \ 00008 361' z6T. 00&18 R R RR R R L 1 7 Sa 0960 096o m �\ . �o Zpz 00022 ooRoxo � 140 2W 00003662 go' n �.. 1A `•6Q6 7 \ ?p;� 4i'1 1106 0140 0150 0150 0150 0150 50 �• �'•\ 4�j �'•106 0150 0020 O0R011 OOOR09 000007 00�05 OS P \\ 00Qx3 +-� �i ��Fp\` �07tQ{Q304 00019 OORt7 00016 R R -�•�.. �•�. j I �LS;�- 1q2 R _ BAY CREST ROAD ------------ 0780 0150 0150 �o ` ��. 1-, OON12 �7t50 0150 000�6 0000 \A 00`00A ��1 1i �-1 py� 0150 1= R ;� 0 R 0 ��6 R R 00000 VIEW ROAD ` tetf� 1 -..� �i: iilapw._ —j Pnax R try�p (� HARBOR lion ! ��'°a ' `3 9TC42 jT x R i = 0020 0 00 c — .� 0780 078000016 06 04/01/2001 2001 As Billed Grand List 10:33 am Summary Grand List Real Estate Only By Parcel N For All Parcels Main District PROPERTY NUMBER OWNER'S NAME LISTED VALUE LOCATION/DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 - 0 CO 14�� -00 9 J Z 0780-00012.1, TAB REALTY 113,800 HARBOR VIEW 0780-00016.L LARKIN JOHN INC 1,709,900 HARBOR VIEW ROAD 0780-00020.0 LARKIN JOHN INC 2,272,900 HARBOR VIEW RD 20 —�0700-00025.L LARKIN JOHN INC 485,600 HARBOR VIEW 07 - 00 R nR J 00 WRN IR 1 07 0 02. C I OP E R�j/ H�30 0 000 . R IrI� V HO CI 3 _ _ — _...�. .............. Zt.1,uV0 bAYCREST DR 34 CONDO 0150-00101.R FROST KAYOTHIA L 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #101 0150-00102.R JOHNSON DAVID H 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #102 0150-00103.R LEONARD KAREN F 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #103 0150-00104.R BOMBARD MATTHEW 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 t104 0150-00105.R RUSSELL JOHN A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #105 0150-00106.R BRYNN MONICA MARIE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #106 0150-00107.R ALLEN DONALD J 6 MADELINE B 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #107 0150-00108.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #108 0150-00109.R ISHAM DOUGLAS S 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #109 0150-00110.R MORGAN JOHN E 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 0110 0150-00111.R LAPOINTE SLYVIA 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #111 0150-00112.R MADDEN JOHN 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #112 0150-00201.R ROCQUE ET ALL 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #201 0150-00202.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #202 Page 8 of 129 martha 04/01/2001 2001 As Billed Grand List 10:33 am Summary Grand List Real Estate Only By Parcel 8 For All Parcels Main District PROPERTY NUMBER OWNER'S NAME LISTED VALUE LOCATION/DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0150-00203.R MCKAY ROBERT b JANICE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #203 0150-00204.R HODGDON FRED b MARLENE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #204 0150-00205.R RUSSELL JOHN A b LYNN 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #205 0150-00206.R CONNELLY THOMAS 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 0206 0150-00207.R VICTORY SUSAN A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 0207 0150-00208.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 8208 0150-00301.R TOKAT ELLIOT D 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #301 0150-00302.R TOKAT ELLIOT D 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #302 0150-00303.R RUSSELL JOHN A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #303 0150-00304.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #304 0150-00305.R LEIBOWITZ MARTIN L 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 4305 0150-00306.R RUSSELL JOHN A b LYNN 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #306 0150-00307.R RESNIK MARTIN b ANNE MARIE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #307 0150-00308.R PASHA JENNIFER A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #308 0150-00309.R MATHON MICHAEL J b LAURENN S 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #309 0150-00310.R MACKIN THOMAS b FRANCINE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 8310 0150-00311.R TOKAT ELLIOT DAVID 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #311 0150-00312.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #312 0150-00401.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #401 0150-00402.R LADEAU LILLIANE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #402 0150-00403.R LARKIN TARRANT HOEHL 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #403 0150-00404.R QUIRION ROGER 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #404 0150-00405.R RYAN KATHY A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #405 0150-00406.R HEBERT THERESA A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #406 0150-00407.R PACZABUT KATELIN G 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #407 0150-00408.R CONNERS JOSEPH S 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #408 0150-00501.R AYER TERESE MASLACK b PATRICK B 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #501 0150-00502.R MARTIN TERRENCE J 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #502 0150-00503.R HOCHMAN RACHEL E 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #503 0150-00504.R OUELETTE MICHAEL R 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #504 0150-00505.R DROLETTE TODD 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #505 0150-00506.R MCGETTRICK TIM J 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #506 0150-00507.R NEWTON ADRIENNE FAYE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #507 0150-00508.R LAWTON KYLE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #508 0150-00601.R GODSEY MARGIE C AKA GOETZE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #601 0150-00602.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #602 0150-00603.R ANGIER SALLY M 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #603 0150-00604.R HESTER PENNY DAWN 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25T 604 0150-00605.R BURDZY LESZEK b DANUTA 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #605 0150-00606.R KEYSANK NATIONAL ASSOC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 8606 0150-00607.R LAPOINTE FRANCIS J 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #607 0150-00608.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #608 ER 160- 0002.R MURPH G ARILYN 76,300 BA ERRY 0160- 0003. DODG F LL 70,80 BA BERRY IN 3 0160 0004 R PO IAW AMI b VIN 73, 0 B YBE L)J 4 0160 0000 .R K GSBU Y GEO GE JOAN 70,800 AYBE Y.iLN 5 016 -000 6.R OOPER NDY C ,800 AYB Y 6 016 -00 07.R PIERR MAR A 70,800 BAY RRY 7 016 -0 008.R HACKE ANETTH M 73,500 B BERRY LN 8 016 0009.R SAVOIE JEFFREY M REY W 70,800 YBERRY 9 Page 9 of 129 martha South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-846-4110 May 30, 2002 Ms. Juli Beth Hoover, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Lakeview at Pillsbury Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the assisted living facility Lakeview at Pillsbury. I have also made a site visit to try to envision the siting of this building. 1 have had opportunity to speak with the building architect Michelle Dufresne and the exterior architect Bill Nedde. I was advised that this building would be of non-combustible construction. Given that, at this time I have the following requests and recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Labor and Industry Fire Prevention Division codes and standards. 2. The building and garage shall be provided with a full automatic sprinkler system. 3. The plan shows 1 new hydrant to be installed. I would request 2 additional hydrants with location to be specified by SBFD. 4. Fire Alarm and Fire Department Sprinkler Connection location to be specified by SBFD. 5. Prior to final approval I would like to view plans which show actual location of corridor fire doors, standpipe locations, and stairwells. 6. Provide an emergency key box, location to be specified by SBFD. 7. Discuss the possibility of an exterior roof access point for ladder truck access to the roof. 8. Elevator car(s) to be sized large enough to accommodate an ambulance stretcher in the flat position. 9. Provide no less exterior building driveway access area than indicated on this set of plans. Also the possibility of modification of the west end driveway to allow ladder truck positioning on the northwest side/corner. Page - 2 At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and Labor and Industry. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. Vrely, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief South Burlington Development Review Board City Engineer Comments for June 4, 2002 meeting Lakeview at Pillsbury Harbor View I. The private street should have a concrete sidewalk. 2. The purposed building should have a perimeter drain around its foundation. Lakeview @ Pillsbury So. Burlington, Vermont -0'�� 10 db INNOVATIVE DESIGN INC. JO Kimball Ave, Suite 101 .0. BUMington , Vt. 06"3 Fax'. 668-0619 —duf—@sa. nel SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION ExTERiOR PIrvISHES, SIDING, GlNENTtTOYS EOARD, PAINTlD W11TE TW —ITE RAILING: STYLE- NEO-CLASSIC. UNTE MARE COLUMNS: UNITE NO"" ASPHALT SHINGLES, TIL! RED "DOUS, UNIT! TRIN TTSE. vmYL, U TE f, • Rer,Nw Dae Rerm. O. •: Pro,I•e1 Nee•: sheet N.ber: INNOVATIVE DESIGN, INC. s ° CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS 30 KIMBALL AVE., SUITE 101 3/32" =1'—O" LAKEVIEW el PILLSBURY A Q S. BURLINGTON, VT. 05403 0. ey: sown Burlington, Ve .-t PHONE: (802) 658-4909 FAX 658-4619 Sheet Tnls: Email: rmCufresOsover.net P" "°eQ ELEVATIONS No Text w EIEV. ]]l14' PARAPET �lyiti 14AT ROOF VjT OR NNT11 BOOR S � 4NST8 L140R i i TrRFl�R 9 ECORP1�90 4S Iwo :I Ll L1 N04T-COxSTRUC b 4 &Rsw'V- BUILDING SECTION RECEIVED APR 17 2002 City of So. Burling on oar. ..o� Onr Ranwn *I CONCEPTUAL BUILDING SECTION INNOVATIVE DESIGN, INC. 30 KIMB LL AVE.,SITE 101 PHONE: (802) 658-4909 FAX: 658-4619 E-4: rmcl fresf -e—et Oaie: Pro, ,Wane: 5 A 9EVIEW a PILLSBURYS.Vc,nont 5h— Hen - A 3 0— 68n-'—o sneer ink, BUILDING SECTION NHang :rea P.— ng—'o >ee Landscape P/en° park/ng Stormluater e.�"�� �1 Detent/an fi Beset -- - w adili., Har bor V/C�-cu Dr/vim Pd/sbury South Community Care Center L..me or Jahn Lafk� /etc. A//anmood Phese .02nrr. tD v Ckster A Bag Court Condomin/ums Zoned: RESIDENTIAL 4 n m I a e> �v z 4 APR 1 i 1uu1 "tyo#So guaingt( Dwe Rerun Dets Rrrson Det<: P Nenel �M1cet N.mLcr. INNOVATIVE DESIGN, INC. 5 ° CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING 30 KIMBALL AVE_ SUITE 101 i = 30 9 PILLSBURY A 4 S. BURLINGTON, VT, 05403 D..wn ev: 5at surliDgeon, ve m t O 1— I 1— O 2 PHONE: (802) 656-4909 FAX: 658-4619 Sheet T"le: E—il:—dute<stso —t `� "°°`° LANDSCAPING k I • A, rt St sLit, ic 1 Distinctive architectural styling offers approximately 50% lower EPA values than a typical shoebox housing. Two sizes are available: 16" and 22" square. Optics Two optical systems are available. The WAC Series uses our forward throw Area Cutoff reflector, with a main beam of 60°+ from vertical (30' from horizontal), providing wide lateral distribution and great uniformity. A Backlight Shield accessory (standard on WAC Series Wall Mount) permits house -side cutoff adjustability. This system can be used as a pole or wall mounted downlight, as well as an indirect wall mount (see page 137). The WPR Series uses our Parking/Roadway reflector (16" housing has a Type ill asymmetric distribution pattern; 22" housing has field adjustable Type II or Type III optics). The WPR Series is a pole- or wall -mounted downlight. Lens A clear, tempered glass lens is held securely in a recessed, die cast door frame. The lens frame is supplied with mounting holes for field - installed accessories, such as the Wire Guard. Gasketing Complete silicone gasketing around lens frame and at mounting provide a watertight seal on the wall mounted downlight and pole mounted fixture. RUUD` LIGHTING U04i `� (�.vu►A'�' � ffe ',` Distinctive V411w architectural styling \ Housing comes standard with our DehaGuard• finish, featuring E-coat epoxy primer and black acrylic powder topcoat Finish Fixtures are standard with our exclusive DeltaGuardfinish, featuring an E-coat epoxy primer with a black acrylic powder topcoat. A red or grey accent stripe is available at no extra charge. Ballast All fixtures are standard with a high power factor ballast. The 35W HPS fixture is standard with a 120V ballast. The 50W MH & 50W HPS are standard with a 120/277V dual -tap ballast. All other wattages are standard with a 120/208/ 240/277V Quad -volt ballast (in Canada,120/277/347V Tri-volt ballast). Ballast options include: 277V ESB for PSMH; 120V Reactor ballast for 50-15OW HPS; 480V option for PSMH,175-40OW MH and 70-40OW HPS. --- D-- Area Cutoff Optics, 0° tilt above horizontal, no backlight shield (backlight cutoff shown as dotted line). Typical isofootcandle' distribution at grade Optional trim strip available in red or .y at no extra charge Lamps The 16" WAC & WPR Series accommodates 50, 70,100 or 175W MH and 35, 50, 70,100 or 150W HPS medium base lamps; the 22" uses 200-40!" v PSMH,175, 250 or 40OW Ni and 250 or 40OW HPS mogul base lamps (an ED28 ,4) reduced envelope lamp is standard in the WAC Series 40OW MH fixture). Wiring 150°C minimum supply wire is required on wall mounted fixtures. Labels The Wedge Light is UL Listed in U.S. and Canada for wet locations and enclosure classified IP54 per IEC 520. Parking/Roadway Optics, 0° tilt above horizontal Typical isofootcandle, distribution at grade 1); 1/2" Close Pole Mount .unting Code "1" or WPR and WAC Series. Extruded aluminum mounting arm attaches fixture in a fixed horizontal position to the side of a square pole. A steel backing plate inside the pole secures the fixture.. • On 16" housings, the arm measures 1-1/2' L x 2-1/2' H; on 22" housings, it measures 1-1/2" L x 4-1/2" H. 6" Extended Pale Mount Mounting Code "2" • For WPR and WAC Series. • Extruded aluminum mounting arm attaches fixture in a fixed horizontal position to the side of a square pole. A steel backing plate inside the pole secures the fixture. • On 16" housings, the arm measures 6' L x 2-1/2' H; on 22" housings, the arm measures 6" L x 4-1/2' H. Wall Mount Mounting Code "W" • For WPR and WAC Series. • Cast aluminum mounting box with gasket attaches in a fixed position to the side of fixture, utilizing threaded mounting studs supplied. • Provided with 4 threaded and closed 1/2' conduit entries. • 150"C minimum supply wire is required. Wedge Light Catalog Number Logic NOTE: See product page for availability. W = Wedge Light Housing =—* EA]C F21 © F40] Optical Systems AC = Area Cutoff (pg. 88) i R = Parking/Roadway (pg. 88) Mountings 1 = 1-1/2" Close Pole 2 = 6" Extended Pole W= Wall (includes wall mount box) Wattages 10 = 100W 12 = 125W PSMH 15 = 150W 17 = 175W MH (16' housing) 20 = 20OW PSMH 25 = 250W 30 = 30OW PSMH 32 = 320W PSMH 35 = 350W PSMH 40 = 40OW 91 = 175W MH (22" housing) 92 = 250W (22" housing) 94 = 40OW (22" housing) 920 = 20OW PSMH (22' housing) 925 = 250W PSMH (22' housing) 930= 30OW PSMH (22' housing) 932 = 320W PSMH (22" housing) 935= 350W PSMH (22" housing) 940= 400W PSMH (22" housino) Lamps/Ballasts 6 = Uni-Form® Pulse Start Metal Halide 4 = Probe Start Metal Halide 5 = High Pressure Sodium imi Voltages 27= 277V Energy Saving Ballast (ESB) (PSMH) 1 = 120V 2 = 277V 3 = 208V 4 = 240V 5 = 480V 6 = 347V (Canada only) D = Dual -volt (120/277V) M =Quad-vo 8/240/277V) T = Tri volt 2 (Canada only) NOTE: D, M or T voltage suffi factory set at highest voltage. Optional Accent Sfrfpa( if G ,II R -L��7• (blank) .- NW ripg,,, r— n 25OW MH Wedge Light with Parking/Roadway and Area Cutoff optics. 40OW HPS Wedge Light with Parking/Roadway optics. om LANDSCAPING PLANT LIST Qty. Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec 4 AE ACER freemanii Freeman Maple 2-2.5 9 BN BETULA nigra "Heritage" Heritage River Birch 8 —10' 1 CA CORNUS alternifolia Pagoda Dogwood 6 — 8' 7 MF MALUS floribunda Japanese Flw. Crab 1.5" 9 PG PICEA glauca White Spruce 5 — 6' 7 PN PINUS nigra Austrian Pine 5 — 6' 22 PS PINUS strobus White Pine 5 — 6' 2 PC PYRUS calleryana Callery Pear 2 — 2.5" 50 TO THUJA occidentalis nigra Dk American Arborvitae 5 — 6' 4 QB QUERCUS bicolor White Swamp Oak 2 — 2.5" 4 QR Quercus rubra Red Oak 2" 1 AA ARONIA arbutifolia Red Chokeberry 2 — 3' 6 CAL CLETHRA alnifolia Summersweet 2 — 3' 10 SC CORUS sericea Red Stem Dogwood 2 — 3' 1 DB DAPHNE burkwoodii Carol Mackie Daphne 2' 9 EA EUONYMOUS alatus Burning Bush 2 — 3' 32 JS JUNIPERUS chinesis "Sargent" Sargents Juniper 15 — 18" 12 JSG JUNIPERUS chinensis "Seagreen" Sea Green Juniper 15 — 18" 12 PF POTENTILLA fructicosa Buttercup Shrub 15 — 18" 10 RP RHODODENDRON "PJM" PJM Rhododendron 18 — 24" 6 RC RHODODENDRON catawbiense Large Leaf Rhododendron 18 — 24" 12 SAW SPIREA bumalda "Anthony Waterer" Anthony Waterer Spirea 2' 40 SLP SPIREA japonica "Little Princess" Little Princess Spirea 15 — 18" 12 SS SPI REA japonica "Shirobana" Peppermint Stick Spirea 15 — 18" 10 SV SYRINGA vulgaris Common Lilac 3 — 4' 8 TM TAXUS media Spreading Yew 18 — 24" 9 VD VIBURNUM dentatum Arrowwood 3 — 4' 14 VP VIBURNUM prinifolium Blackhaw Viburnum 4 — 5' 21 VT VIBURNUM trilobum American Cranberry 4 — 5' 40 Assorted Perennials 1-gal. 250 Assort. Spring bulbs 48 Daylillies -> 1 - 31 00 - 60( BRACKETS C .' D 7 4 NTERNS L6023•AA Black L6023•BA White L6023•GA Verde L6023•UA Corvel Rust Clear Glass, 200W, Med. lamp, 40" H,18'/2" W, 3" Fitter Optional 4—light Candelabra Cluster for Incandescent Fixtures — Add C4 to Model No. 82125•AA Block B2125•BA White 82125•GA Verde 82125•UA Corvel Rust Pointed Finial, Clear Glass, 100W, Med. Base Socket, 291/4" H,12%" W, 141/4" Projection, 22" TTO, B2128•AA Block 82128•BA White B2128•GA Verde 82128•UA Corvel Rust Painted Finial and Spindle, Clear Glass, I00W, Med. Base Socket, 37'/2" H 12'/a" W, 141/4" Projection, 22" TTO B2150•ABC4 Black B2150•BBC4 White B2150•GBC4 Verde 62150•UBC4 Corvel Rust Brass Finial, Clear Glass, 4-25W, Candelabra, 34" H,127/s" W, 16" Projection, 23" Tr0 B3125•AA Black 83125•BA White B3125•GA Verde B3125•UA Corvel Rust Painted Finial, Clear Glass, 60W, Med. Base Socket, l 9Y H, 9%4" W, 91/4" Projection, 14'/2" TTO B3127•AA Black 83127•BA White B3127•GA Verde B3127•UA Corvel Rust Brass Finial and Spindle, Clear Glass, 60W, Med. Base Socket, 231/4" H 9'/4" W 91/4" Projection, 14'/2" TTO 86038•AA Black 86038•BA White B6038•GA Verde B6038•UA Corvel Rust Clear Glass, 200W, Med. Base Socket, 40'/z" H,18'/2" W, 20" Projection, 20T TTO t LANT.ERNS L2123•AA Black L2123•BA White L2123•GA Verde L2113•UA Corvel Rust Brass Finial, Clear Glass, IOOW, Med. Base Socket, 29'/4" H,12'/s" W, 3" Fitter L3126•AA Black L3126•BA White L3126•GA Verde L3126•UA Corvel Rust Painted Finial, Clear Glass, 60W, Med. Base Socket, 20'/4" H, 9'/a" WD, 3" Fitter ,*V-17 , 41-10 41-15 1 Item Number Finish "'"wfDifi Hl%%mwlr' Of Outlet Box Bulbs Max. Wattage Footnotes 8338-10 Bronze (Aluminum) 4 1/2" 7" 7 7/8" 2 3/4" One (M) 65w (BR-30) 8338-15 White (Aluminum) 4112" 7" 7 7/8" 2 3/4" One (M) ` 65w (BR-30) 8339-10 Bronze (Aluminum) 6" 8 7/8" 9 3/8" 3 1/2" One (M) 120w (BR-40) 8339-15 White (Aluminum) 6" 8 7/e" 9 3/a" 31/2" One (M) 120w (BR-40) 8340-10 Bronze (Aluminum) 5" 15" 81/4" 7 1/2" Two (M) - 65w (BR-30) DAMP 8340-15 White (Aluminum) 5" 15" 8 1/4" 71/2" Two (M) 65w (BR-30) DAMP 8341-10 Bronze (Aluminum) 6" 18" 91/4" 9" Two (M) 120w (BR-40) DAMP 8341-15 White (Aluminum) 6" 18" 9 1/4" 9" Two (M) 120w (BR-40) DAMP 8438-15 White (Aluminum) 41/2" 7" One (M) 65w (BR-30) DAMP 8439-15 White (Aluminum) 6" 9" One (M) 120w (BR-40) " DAMP 8606-12 Black (Aluminum)Adj. Swivel Flood Light 5 3/a" One (M) 120w (BR-40) 8606-15 White (Aluminum) Adj. Swivel Flood Light 5 3/4" One (M) 120w (BR-40) 8607-12 Black (Aluminum)Adj. Swivel Flood Light 5 3/a" Two (M) 120w (BR-40) 8607-15 White (Aluminum)Adj. Swivel Flood Light 5 3/a" Two (M) 120w (BR-40 8642-12 Black Polycarbonate Adj. Swivel Flood Light 91/i" 4" 5 3/4" Two (M) 90w (PAR 38/HIR) 8642-15 White Polycarbonate Adj. Swivel Flood Light 91/2 4" 5 3/4' Two (M) 90w (PAR 38/HIR) 9002-12 Black (Aluminum) Step Baffle For 8438 And 8338 9003-12 Black (Aluminum) Step Baffle For 8439And 8339 9008-12 Black Weather Resistant Diffuser For Outdoor Use On 8340 9009-12 Black Weather Resistant Diffuser For Outdoor Use On 8341 DAMP: U.L. Listed For Damp Location, Items 6340 And 8341 Are Listed For Wet Location If Used With 9008 Or 9009 Weather Resistant Diffuser V7 In C,4,� Aw ems � 613, see 0911 HOMED L, 235 LARGE STEP'LYTES 9„ (229mm) diameter RPaB3 4" projection Recessed Box 8-7/2" (275mm) diameter 6" (753mm) Deep " .. �. EUAW a� WALL FIXTURE 10 5 2 0.5 1 0.2 0.1 18 9 0 9 is LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE (R.) RR83 Distribution: Symmetric Lamp/Wattage. SOW MH Mounting Height: 3' 9" (229mm) diameter WNW W 7'projection Eiegant styling combines with a lighting capacity of up to 70w metal halide to Recessed Box form the RR3 and RS3 Large Steplytes. - The fixtures are specifiable with a 8-W' (275mm). diameter wide light distribution bubble lens for further spacing or a cast louver face - 6' (153mm) Deep plate with -shadow -free frosted lens. Symmetric reflectors are available as well as asymmetric reflectors for field adjustment for left or right light distribution Am IANtE T spot lights light bulbs available ■ Directional spot lights provide optimum light See Pages 284>& 285 output for accent and security lighting. For More Information:.; ■ Use to achieve dramatic effects such as: downlighting, uplighting, moonlighting, and spotlighting. ■ Angular silicone glare shield holds a tempered borosilicate glass lens for water resistance and affords easy lamp replacement with no screws or tools. ■ Fully adjustable swivel base easily mounts to walls, fences, and other solid surfaces or attaches to a 1/2" threaded pipe or polycarbonate stake (each sold separately. ■ Large swivel with internal teeth and stainless steel screw allows for precise aiming. ■ Constructed of rugged die-cast aluminum with a powder coat finish. ■ Corrosion resistant finish is guaranteed for ten years. ■ 12V fixtures supplied with 36" 16/2 AWG cable for flexible electrical connection. ■ For 12 volt fixtures select miniature halogen light bulbs, or 120 volt fixtures use encapsulated halogen light bulbs. ■ UL and C-UL listed for wet locations. SPOT LIGHTS 9326-12 Black Finish 24 as-8-2 gull fighting 9312-12 9323-12 9325-12 9313-12 932G-12 WARNING: Use of other manufacturers' components will void warranty and UL listing anc create a potential safety hazard.© Design Copyright Sea Gull Lighting Products, Inc. c�� s72s ,y rr S r , `�'���. Lam` �'� t-+'x,M, ^� y x g � ,� - � ��• 9. . "it w� `?.�. �?:�i � 'k�,r i Rba di e T f Y ° a .8 � +�. �a°' ✓ . 44 n J "Al ' l a Nc , a T' 'na V s "` � �' ...c: •a '^„ y fy i �itfl fr _ � } `��?a� "a i�,-.�.t T N,'t` k�k• z � e '., ryf'c +'+"ice J.., � -. «3., � ,. szt, .., _ � f t � uh s ...,✓J sc>a S u � s � 3 :'ak° r. +^4 1`,kC,<�wh/w 1p f .ra M n f.,: 5 IRECESS EmD FLUORESCEN, T lighting. ENERGY SAVERS light bulbs available See Pages 284 & 285 For More Information._ 1140 NEW CONSTRUCTION / NON -IC HOUSING • UL listed for use where insulation is kept at least three inches away from housing • UL listed for damp locations • Thermal protector safeguards against overheating caused by improper insulating and tamping • Trim removable for easy access to junction box • Junction box saves installation time with snap on covers, pry -out knock outs, riveted ground wire thru branch circuit wiring, four in -four out #12 wire rated for 75°C. • Bar hangers adjustable to 24" mounted for sturdy installation, will not fall out of plaster flange • Provided with captive nails for fast, easy installation • Includes two Class P normal power factor ballasts • Accommodates two IN compact fluorescent lamps mounted horizontally for greater efficiency. 1 141 REMODEL / NON -IC HOUSING • UL listed for use where insulation is kept at least three inches away from housing • UL listed for damp locations • Thermal protector safeguards against overheating caused by improper insulating and tamping } • Trim removable for easy access to junction box • Junction box saves installation time with snap on covers, pry -out knock outs, riveted ground wire, thru branch circuit wiring, four in -four out #12 wire rated for 75°C. • Provided with mounting clips and adjustable ballast support bracket for fast, easy installation • Includes two Class P normal power factor ballasts • Accommodates two 13w compact fluorescent lamps mounted horizontally for greater efficiency, Item Number finish Trim Diameter Bulbs Wattage 1 142-22 White Aluminum Multiplier 7 5/a" Two (Compact Fluorescent) 13w 1 143-14 White White Baffle 7 5/a" Two (Compact Fluorescent) 13w 1 143-15 White Black Baffle 7 5/e" Two (Compact Fluorescent) 13w Energy Saving Fluorescent _ _ so _/%k1rTM I landscape ■ Decorative shades emit soft, even illumination. ■ Perfect for lighting steps, pathways, decks, walls, fences, and ground cover. ■ High heat thermal, shock -resistant, etched borosilicate glass with bayonet base makes installation and relamping quick and ■ Constructed of rugged die-cast aluminum with a powder coat f ■ Corrosion resistant finish is guaranteed for ten years. ■ For 12 volt systems select miniature Xenon, halogen, and incandescent light bulbs, or 120 volt systems use incandescent or fluorescent light bulbs. ■ UL and C-UL listed for wet locations. ■ Choose individual components or complete kits. 9302-12 SHADE 9303-12 SH Diameter: 4'/z" ■ Height: 31/4" Diameter: 3" - He KIT 5-12 Complete with sh< T-5 18w wedge b, and molded oolvc 9304-12 SHADE Diameter: 3 W ■ Height. 41/2" , 9308-33 SHADE Diameter: 41/2" -,Height: 31/8"' 20 28-82 WARNING: Use of other manufacturers' components will void warranty and UL listing and creatE �O potential safety hazard.© Design Copyright Sea Gull Lighting Products, Inc., US Patent # 5,249, i DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO June 4, 2002 MEETING The approval for the sign should be conditioned on submittal of revised site plans clearly showing the location of the landscape feature sign. 3) HUBBARD CONSTRUCTION, INC.—AMENDMENT TO A FINAL PLAT, GOLF COURSE ROAD The project consists of amending a planned residential development for 296 residential units and an 18-hole golf course. The amendment consists of converting three undeveloped single family lots into two single family lots, by dissolving the boundaries of lot # 121. This project received preliminary plat approval at the 16 April, 2002 DRB meeting (minutes enclosed). This property at Golf Course Road is located in the Southeast Quadrant District. It is bounded on all sides by single family residential units. Access: Access is provided via a public road. Lot size/Frontage: The lot size and frontage of lots # 120 and # 123 are increasing with the dissolution of lot 4,121. 4) J. P. LARKIN--SITE PLAN, HARBOR VIEW ROAD This project is to construct a 113 unit congregate care facility (six floors,) on undeveloped land. This project located on Harbor View Road lies within the Commercial 1 and Bartlett Brook Overlay Districts. It is bounded on the east by condominium developments (Harbor Heights and Bay Court) and the Residential 4 Zoning District, on the south by Harbor View Road, and on the west by commercial hotel development. Access/Circulation: Access is provided via two 26 foot wide curb cut off a private drive which connects to the Howard Johnson's parking lot. Coverage/Setbacks: The applicant meets all setback requirements associated with the proposed height increase and are indicated on the plan. The proposed coverages are: building 7.8% (maximum allowed is 30%), and overall coverage is 26.3% (maximum allowed is 70%) Parking: The parking requirement is 34 parking spaces. The plan shows 131 parking spaces 92 exterior spaces and 39 underground, including four (4) accessible spaces and 2 accessible van spaces. The plan shows 90' parking spaces measuring 20' x 9' and a 20 foot aisle. Staff requests the plans be revised to show 18' x 9' spaces with a 24 foot aisle. A bike rack is shown on the site plan. %1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO June 4, 2002 MEETING Landscaping: The landscape requirement is $87,500. The applicant is proposing $40,000 worth of landscaping. This represents a $47,500 shortfall. Traffic: The applicant has provided a traffic analysis, performed by Resource Systems Group. ITE estimates (staff used congregate care facility category) the property will generate 19.21 vehicle trip ends. Height: The applicant is requesting a height waiver. The proposed height measured from the average pre -construction grade (221.25) is 70.75 feet. This represents a 36 foot increase in height for a flat roofed structure. The Board may approve this height increase in the Cl District if they find that [Section 25.113 (c)] (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located. (ii) will not detract from important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of —way. Dumpster: Dumpsters are located to the rear of the proposed building and will be screened from view. Lighting_A11 exterior lighting should consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures, cut sheets have been supplied and will be reviewed by the Director of Planning and Zoning. South Burlington Water Department: The applicant needs to comply with all requests from the South Burlington Water Department. South Burlington Fire Department: The project must comply with all requests from the Fire Department. Bartlett Brook Overlay District: This project is within the Bartlett Brook Overlay District. No information on stormwater treatment has been submitted to the City for review at this time. 5) JEFF NICK, J.L. DAVIS REALTY —FINAL PLAT, 1275 AIRPORT PARKWAY This project consists of a minor boundary line adjustments that will result in 1) lot C increase in size from 3.6 acres to 5.8 acres, and 2) reducing the size of lot B from 15.7 to 13.5 acres, 1275 Airport Parkway. This project was reviewed for sketch on 3 April, 2001 (minutes are enclosed). This property is located in the Mixed Industrial, Commercial District, and Conservation Open Space District, is bounded on the north by the Winooski River, on the east by a vacant lot and Berard Drive, on the south by commercial properties, and on the west by a vacant lot. BoundM Line Adjustment: The proposed boundary line adjustment will move the north to south property boundary line between lot B and lot C to the east. 3 as Liaht1na Schedule 1"U, hOW C�f Install bay bal. P.*hV - /104 -td hlH 1W MH 18' .091. ( w A-1 (-.11 W..�,. 1411t Wc/WR 2 e r, --I- oe�. 101, IM MI 12' ekgl. .-d -1� (W 9W#10fe 2W staff New patio lilhtbg See Landscape Plans Conservation and Open Space District setbook \ � Bay Court Condominiums Zoned: RESIDENTIAL 4 Screened trash endbsure with recycling bins. tocothon Ma V 7p:­- Zoning Information , -Owner ontLAwffcant._ Lot Cowrovew ! John P. Larkin, Inc. Lot Area (7.03 acres) = 306,227 sf. h `M, t 410 Shelburne Road South 8urlington, Vt. 0540,T Pr000"d Lq . .... . (60,*) - 854-7444 _( co. Proposed Buileing to Wroge = 7 8x (JOX am.) proposed tot coverage = 26.JX (70X max.) fquildw4,\ ... .... 7. 03 acres ORO .... . rMni Yard 00 Commercial 2 Front Yard Area = 28,63I sf prAe»drx one osed buildln i7l be ­d by Parking, Roods = IJ40 sf. vem ......... Front Yard Coverage = '340 - 4.7X ovE _FU t 1-11 Parking 17 Front = 40 feet 86 exterior regular spaces Sloe = 15 test 6 exterior handicapped spaces Ax Re- = 30 feet $0o 92 total exterior spaces --Z 39 total Interior NIP* A, spaces Ho 131 7"otal Spaces Provided ,-- cone. pad V.,. = 216. 10 kta Allenwood Phase A— - ta? A — Legend l7h/M 9,ee, vO .1..tl- App101. Lh,, -W- ftnL-1 gate " _W_ Water Lm,/ Pee valve - .e L11, -aG -6r G jv_ G_ 4M. CW*,g t­, ln, IJb M be Ap 4 _ST_1 A- z �1 of 0. '80, BAR SCALE i x, Permit Number SP- CITY OF SOUTH BUFLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) John P. Larkin, Inc., 410 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-864-7444 fax 864-0649 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) Vol 219, Page 360 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) same as owner 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) William H. Nedde III X.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, 164 Main St., Suite 201, Colchester, VT 05446 802 878-0375 fax 878-9618 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS Lot 10, Harbor View Road, South Burlington, VT 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0780-00025-C 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Vacant b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Senior Housing project c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Living space = 21,437 s.f. Porch 2,556 &E Canopy 440 s.E d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) 70.75' from pre -construction average grade of 221.25 The building will have 6 floors plus under ground parking e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 113 Elderlylg units f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees):Dayshift = 12 full time and 4 part-time; Evening shift = 3 full time; 1 company van g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Bartlett Brook Overlay District. 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 7.8 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 4.1 % Proposed 26.3 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 4.7 % Proposed 4.7 % 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (Including interior renovations): $ 8,000,000 b) Landscaping: $ 40,000 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Road, sidewalk, curb, storm, sewer, water and lighting = $100,000.t 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC (See Traffic Report) a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 180 (estimated) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 61 c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Weekends 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 2003 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A) 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge OF SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 3 MATCH SHEET 59 11720 00027 � 1330 00036 00025 _ _ i � r 1410 � PPR„ C� 1 W 1410 1410 OO1410 1 1 00014 R12 -WATER. SEWER. MjD PEDESTR —" 141 i R \\ �i' EASEA/ENT __ NPI 6 1 0001 s d1 000170960 --- _- ' •\ \ \ 0960 00017 R `\\ C. 37 t 31 1C \` 4I� " " � `,,os: �o 3� 0960 KEARI 11�NE D ` 40g064Q6°3 OS'304 00024 ;, 3k2 �p� 0150 *3 = L �` ^ \ 0o0oe '-301' 208,, o°o 68 �02 503- '\. -\209% 04*, 00022 00020 m fTl 4,506 W7 2p2 R R 602 6006` \�/ .\ ,d72 000003 0 O) `60a606 7 / _ �\ 4.41 1 jX1 � 0002s _ '� i-_— i` 'Vrc`?y- k7 tOQ 0150 C I \Ep\ 1041P4.. 0150 00017 �403 103 00019 R 0150 0780 OQOOA a,w ; HARBOR VIEW ROAD PON _ 1 0150 R 00000 2 j i 1 trr� R !23 `1�RS✓ N Ti I i Vt206 AIM � 00012 � I 00016 " L � ` off * .� v ` I \ O n c� Z TT O 0i). C �C m m �. m �' Z W m c/) rn 90 _ M I Z r �a — o� ZZ z m rrl Z ON W UO N C A al z Z � n R R - - KEARI LANE OOoi� 0001 n OOOOA 00006 00004 0( BAY CREST ROAD 0150 00012 N p ftR-,O OOR06 8000 6 0°OROd 04/01/2001 2001 As Billed Grand List Page 8 of 129 10:33 am Summary Grand List martha Real Estate Only By Parcel it For All Parcels Main District PROPERTY NUMBER OWNER'S NAME LISTED VALUE LOCATION/DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 - 0 COW �-Wi � 4 0 -00 9 4'0 V 0780-00012.1, TAB REALTY 113,800 HARBOR VIEW 0780-00016.L LARKIN JOHN INC 1,709,900 HARBOR VIEW ROAD 0780-00020.0 LARKIN JOHN INC 2,272,900 HARBOR VIEW RD 20 10780-00025.L LARKIN JOHN INC 485,800 HARBOR VIEW 07 - 00 R RO B j 7 00 W RN IR 07 0 02. ' / I G CH Z OP E R�j HORN/ V 0 0 000 .R ✓ EFE If� V sl� cla,Uvu HAYCREST DR 34 CONDO 0150-00101.R FROST KAYOTHIA L 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #101 0150-00102.R JOHNSON DAVID H 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #102 0150-00103.R LEONARD KAREN F 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #103 0150-00104.R BOMBARD MATTHEW 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #104 0150-00105.R RUSSELL JOHN A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 8105 0150-00106.R BRYNN MONICA MARIE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #106 0150-00107.R ALLEN DONALD J & MADELINE B 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #107 0150-00108.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #108 0150-00109.R ISHAM DOUGLAS S 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #109 0150-00110.R MORGAN JOHN E 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #110 0150-00111.R LAPOINTE SLYVIA 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #111 0150-00112.R MADDEN JOHN 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #112 0150-00201.R ROCQUE ET ALL 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 8201 0150-00202.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #202 04/01/2001 2001 As Billed Grand List Page 9 of 129 10:33 am Summary Grand List martha Real Estate Only By Parcel # For All Parcels Main District PROPERTY NUMBER OWNER'S NAME LISTED VALUE LOCATION/DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0150-00203.R MCKAY ROBERT & JANICE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #203 0150-00204.R HODGDON FRED & MARLENE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #204 0150-00205.R RUSSELL JOHN A & LYNN 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #205 0150-00206.R CONNELLY THOMAS 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #206 0150-00207.R VICTORY SUSAN A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #207 0150-00208.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #208 0150-00301.R TOKAT ELLIOT D 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #301 0150-00302.R TOKAT ELLIOT D 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #302 0150-00303.R RUSSELL JOHN A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #303 0150-00304.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #304 0150-00305.R LEIBOWITZ MARTIN L 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #305 0150-00306.R RUSSELL JOHN A & LYNN 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #306 0150-00307.R RESNIK MARTIN & ANNE MARIE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #307 0150-00308.R PASHA JENNIFER A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #308 0150-00309.R MATRON MICHAEL J & LAURENN S 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #309 0150-00310.R MACKIN THOMAS fi FRANCINE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #310 0150-00311.R TOKAT ELLIOT DAVID 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #311 0150-00312.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #312 0150-00401.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #401 0150-00402.R LADEAU LILLIANE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #402 0150-00403.R LARKIN TARRANT HOEHL 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #403 0150-00404.R QUIRION ROGER 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #404 0150-00405.R RYAN KATHY A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #405 0150-00406.R HEBERT THERESA A 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #406 0150-00407.R PACZABUT KATELIN G 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #407 0150-00408.R CONNERS JOSEPH S 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #408 0150-00501.R AYER TERESE MASLACK & PATRICK B 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #501 0150-00502.R MARTIN TERRENCE J 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #502 0150-00503.R HOCHMAN RACHEL E 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #503 0150-00504.R OUELETTE MICHAEL R 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #504 0150-00505.R DROLETTE TODD 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #505 0150-00506.R MCGETTRICK TIM J 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #506 0150-00507.R NEWTON ADRIENNE FAYE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #507 0150-00508.R LAWTON KYLE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #508 0150-00601.R GODSEY MARGIE C AKA GOETZE 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #601 0150-00602.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #602 0150-00603.R ANGIER SALLY M 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #603 0150-00604.R HESTER PENNY DAWN 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25T 604 0150-00605.R BURDZY LESZEK & DANUTA 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #605 0150-00606.R KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #606 0150-00607.R LAPOINTE FRANCIS J 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #607 �01150-00608.R LARKIN JOHN INC 75,000 BAY CREST DR 25 #608 ER 160- 0002.R MURPH G ILYN 76,300 BA ERRY 0160- 0003. DODG F LL 70,80 BA BERRY IN 3 0160 0004 R PO IAW AMI 6 VIN 73, 0 YBE Ly 4 0160 0000 .R K GSBU Y GEO GE JOAN 70,800 AYBE Y/LN 5 016 -000 6.R OOPER NDY C ,800 AYB Y 6 016 -00 07.R PIERR A 70,800 BAY RRY 7 O16 -0 008.R HACKE ANETTE M 73,500 B BERRY 8 016 0009.R SAVOIE JEFFREY M REY W 70,800 YBERRY 9 l Innovative Design Inc. 30 Kimball Ave., Suite 101 • So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Phone: (802) 658-4909 • Fax: (802) 658-4619 Innovative Design Inc. April 16, 2002 Mr. Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Ray: Please find enclosed an application for Site Plan Review for Lakeview @ Pillsbury. We are proposing to build a 6-story, 113 unit Senior Housing project. The property fronts Harbor View Road in South Burlington directly behind Holiday Suites, within the C2 district. Congregate Housing is permitted as a conditional use within this district. This project provides a transition between residential properties to the commercial uses on Route 7. While a single building with a large mass, in the residential use is consistent with the adjacent properties and the use as senior housing will have minimal traffic impact. The building is sited along the natural topography and embankment at the rear of the site, against a canopy of trees reducing the visual impact from Harbor View Road. The building is located 146' off the Harbor Road View right-of-way. Under section 26.05 of the City of Burlington Zoning Regulations: a. The capacity of existing or planned municipal or education facilities will be minimally affected since the project is a senior housing project. b. The character of the neighborhood would not be affected since this project is a similar use to those of adjacent properties. C. Traffic impact would be minimally affected since it is a senior housing project. d. This project is in conformance for C2 district and with South Burlington's master plan. e. With the southern exposure and expanse of glass this building will help with solar renewable energy. With the layout of the building we have maximized the "green space". f. This project helps with the continuing need of housing while providing a safe and social community for South Burlington's seniors. 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • April 16, 2002 Page 2 We are requesting a waver to the height of the building. The compact single footprint of 6-stories minimizes the site impact, creating more "green space" while achieving economic liability of the prof ect. Under section 25.113.c of the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations: This building will not affect the essential character of the neighborhood or district because it is sited in along the natural topography of the land. This building is only one story higher than Harbor View, and blends in with it's surrounding area. With the existing canopy of trees surrounding the back and sides of the building the visual impact will be minimal. ii. This building will not detract from important scenic views from the adjacent public roadways or other public -rights -of -ways because we have maximized the set back distance from Harbor View Road while addressing the natural topography of the site. Under section 25.113.d The allowable height of a building is 35'. The proposed building height is 70.75' making a difference of 35.75'. Zoning requires an increase of front and rear to be one foot for every foot, making our set back requirement 66' min. Our actual set back at the worse case is 118'. We feel our project will be an asset to the community by increasing the housing opportunities for seniors in South Burlington. Sincerely, Michelle Dufresne, RA No Text r,-,- 2` g�:T `� C� W Itc"" I/J 9.4 AM 1 KREBS & LANSING( CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 164 Main Street COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 878-0375 ? FAX (802) 878-9618 TO WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order Ll 11EUV�n 91� DATE i I JOB NO. ATTENTION REZ:�ZZd: 09 0 9 S ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION it THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval For your use LJ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections El Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO If en -Mures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 April 25, 2002 Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 RE: Lakeview at Pillsbury South Burlington The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. There shall be an 18" minimum vertical separation between the new 6"DI water main and the new 12" storm main at their crossing point. 2. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington, Colchester Fire District #1, and the Village of Jericho. 3. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances and water line crossings. 4. Details shall be modified to be those from the above referenced specifications. Specifically, concrete shall not be poured under any gate valves, as shown in your Thrust Block Details. Instead the valves shall be encased in crushed stone, per the specifications,, A Tapping Sleeve and Valve Detail shall also be added to the Detail page. 5. This department shall be notified of any changes to this project with revised, updated hard copy plans sent directly to us for further review. 6. Further changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 7. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent Cc. Stephanie Smith Expans/on JW,t every 20' score 1" deep every 5' -� Broom finish concrete sidewotk (typical) see site plan 4" topsoil and seed 1/1" to 3/4"-\ ft. Crushed grow/ subbase (704. 05A, fine) ✓oint Alter sho// be resilient non-extrudng ceNuic fiber JOIN,anlfornly saturated with asphalt, offering o Concrete curb (typ.) minimum of 70%recovery after compression. _�f22C1.8�s GLLtL - Broom finish concrete - All joints to be too/ finished - Expansion/contraction joints every 20' with 1/2" joint Adler. - Score 1/3 total depth at 10' intervals D 4-.t. 7" e1 p b/tumkraus concrete e_ e if top coarse pavement is not laid in / same season os base, the contractor / shall sweep and apply emu/sited asphalt to base coarse pavement prior to laying top coursee, bituminous concrete Type TypeX,7E 'Leveling course (704.05A, fine) Crushed grays/ subbase (70..05A, coarse) 'rot 500X tlon A// concrete used in the cbe - a, Of concrete sidewalk shot/ be air � entrained (5 - 7 %) and mode with Provide expansion joint where (/\�'S Proof roll ol/ Portland cement The concrete shal/ sidewalk meets the curb. subgrade with meet section 501 of the State of Undisturbed materiel or compacted Engineer present. Vermont Standard Spec/R otlon for Use anti-spolling to concrete f// (see road note ^ and RJ) Coss 8 concrete and hair 28 day curb and sidewalk according to comp essivs strength of 3500 psi. manufacturers recommendofions. Typfco/ Road Cross Section. Concrete _-Curb and SidewalkDetail N. 7S Road Construction Notes (Al/ references to road sho// apply to parkng oroos as we// ) 1. New road sho// be constructed to the line and grade shown on the drawings. The road and utility locations shall be as typically detailed unless otherwise shown. 2 All road and parking construction shall be completed in accordance with the Vermont Agency of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction' 1990, hereafter called Vermont Highway Specifications, specifications found on these plans, and City/Town Specifications. In case of conflict the more stringent specification shall apply as determined by the Engineer. 3 The Contractor shall follow Vermont Highwoy Specifications (1990) Section 203..11 for placing and spreading embankments. 4. Fill material for road embankment shall be approved by the Engineer. Fill shall be p/aced /n 12" lifts, wetted and compacted with satisfactory compaction equipment to 95X of maximum density (Standard Proctor). 5 Road in fill sections shall be placed and compacted a minimum of 3 feet above top of any utility to be installed before trench is excavated for pipe placement. /n trenches and cut sections, the Contractor sho/l provide oll necessary sheeting, shoring and bracing to maintain compliance with all OSHA/VOSHA regulations. 5. Methods for construction of subgrade shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 203. 12 or as determined by the Engineer. 7. Any subgrade or subbase disturbed by Contractor, or rendered unsuitable by construction mochinery, shall be removed and replaced with approved granular bockfill at the Contractor's expense. fie subgrade shall be compacted to attain at least 95X of the maximum density (Standard Proctor) before placing rood or embankment materials. 8. the Contractor shall be responsible for coordination of compaction in the road and utility trenches. 9. Sand Al shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 70303 Tob/e 703.03A. Granular borrow shall conform to the Vermont Highway Specifications 703..04 Granular Borrow, Table 703.04A. 10. Gravel subbase for pavement shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 704.05, Table 704.05A, coarse. 11, Leveling course shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 704.05, Table 704.05A, fine. Shoulders shall conform to Section 704.12, Aggregate for Shoulders. 12. Bituminous concrete pavement shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) Section 404 and 406. Binder course shall be Type Z and finish wearing course shall be Type X. 13. Embankment fill for road and parking shall be a sieve specification as follows: Sieve X F/nF/ner 4" 100 2" 85-100 ,j'4 60-100 ,02200 12 moxfmum 1. /n addition to the above requirements, a// water lines and sewer lines and manholes shall be thoroughly tested by the Contractor in accordance with the Environmental Protection Rules 9/10/",, Appendix A, Section A-02(✓&K), A-04(G&H) anal Chapter 8, Section 802. 2. No water main shall be closer than ten (10) feet to any sanitary sewer, storm sewer or sanitary manhole and live (5) feet to any catch basin. Provide minimum of 18" vertical separation between water main and storm/sanitary sewer. J. All manholes shall be vacuum tested in the presence of the Engineer The manholes shall be tested prior to backflL rest procedures and pressure shall be determined jointly by the local approval agency and the Engineer. Failure of any vacuum test shall necessitate repair and/or replacement of the manhole and retest. Water testing manholes is not acceptable. 4. All force mains shall be hyv'rostabba//y tested in accordance with A WWA C-600 in the presence of the Engineer. Test procedure and pressure shall be determined jo/nt/y by the local approval agency and the Engineer. At a minimum, the test pressure shall be 50 pounds per square inch at the highest point along the test. 5 The Contractor shall keep a log book of at least three swing ties to service locations and any points of defection or water main fittings. Books shall be turned over to the South Burlington Public Works Office upon acceptance of the work. Elevations to the top of services shall also be recorded. _Construction Notes 1. The Contractor will be responsible for a// construction of water main, storm and sanitary sewer systems as shown on the plans. The Contractor w111 be responsible for all necessary adapters, fittings, etc. to make connections to the existing and proposed units The Contractor shall be responsible for all work shown or implied bn the plans and/or referenced /n the specifications and permits The Contractor shall submit, for approval by the Engineer, all types of materials and products used. Water Main 1. fie pipe for water main sho/l be ductile iron. Ductile iron rttings shall conform to AWWA C110, 350 pounds working pressure. Valves shall be manufactured to meet a// requirements of AWWA specification C509. IA. 777e pipe for water service shall be copper type k. Copper tubing shall meet the requirements of Federal Specification WW-T 7996 and shall conform to ASTM specification B-75, 8-88 and 9-68 as they apply to type k copper tubing. 2. All pipe shall be installed /n accordance with AWWA C600. The pipe shall be kept free of foreign matter and debris during instollotion. When the process of pipe laying has stopped, any open ends of pipe shall be plugged. There shall be a minimum of 6 -O" (1.82 m) cover over a// pipe and service lines. Any pipe deflection shall not exceed fifty (50X) percent of recommended monufocturer's maximum defection. BackfT/1 materials and procedures shall be as detailed on the drawings. The Contractor shall be responsible for any and all sheeting and/or shoring necessary to comply with OSHA - VOSHA regulations. J. The testing of the water main shall consist of the testing of all installed pipe, services and hydrants in accordance with AWWA C600 (except as noted). The testing sholl consist of a pressure test and leakage test. All testing shall be done with potable water and in the presence of the Engineer The pressure test consists of maintaining a minimum internal pipe pressure of 200 psi (140,620 kg/m 2)for two (2) hours. If the pressure drops more than 5 psi (3515 kg/m 2) for the specified time constitutes failure of the test for the particular section of pipe. Failure of any test section will necessitate repair and/or replacement of the failed section. 4. Chlorination of the system shall be accomplished after the water main has been successfully pressure tested and thoroughly Pushed. Disinfection shall be in accordance with AWWA C-651. The disinfection process shall be deemed acceptable only after two samples of water from the flushed disinfected male shows no evidence of bacteriological contamination. Use minimum 50 mg// chlorine concentration for 24 hours. fie concentration must remain above 25 mg/1. Tab/et disinfection is not acceptable. Sanitary dc_ Storm _ Mains 1. the pipe and fittings for sanitary sewer shall meet the requirements of ASTM specification D3034 for 4" - 15" SOR 35 and F679 for 18" - 27". Al/ pipe shall be laid to the line and grade shown on the plans. All applicable OSHA - VOSHA regulations shall be followed for the trench work. IA. The pipe for storm sewer shall be reinforced concrete, class V and meet the requirements of ASTM specifcotion C76. O" Ring gaskets shall meet ASTM speclAcction C443 All pipe shall be laid to the line and grade as shown on the plans. All applicable OSHA - VOSHA regulations shall be followed for the trench work. 2 The installed sanitary sewer pipe shall be low pressure air tested in the presence of the Engineer, After pipe cleaning, the pipe section (manhole to manhole) shall be tested according to the following procedures: An internal pipe pressure of 5 psi. A minimum of two (2) minutes shall be allowed for temperature stabilization. The pipe section shall be considered acceptable /f this section does not lose air when tested at o pressure of 4 psl for 5 minutes. A// joints sho// be thoroughly cleaned and coated with emulsifled asphalt prior to paving. 1/16" lhickness of exlst/ng pavement 0' minimum) Thickness of exx/s11ng grovel (18" m/nlmum dense graded crushed grove per VT state spec. 704.05A) 1. Set up and maintain signs and other somty control devices.. 2. Reshape hole and patch area by cutting with a concrete saw into square or rectanguior shape and art side faces vertically. Reshape downward solid moter/o/ and around hole to sound pavement. d Backfill trench in 6" lifts and compact each lift to 959 of maximum density of optimum moisture content as determined by ASTM D698 standard proctor. 4. Remove ali loose material and thoroughly sweep the have area clean of mud and standing water. Existing bituminous ore baths an /des a 4 a Ex/st/ng grovel base a . 5 Apply iou/d asphalt tack to vertical faces In a unif E C E' V i^' Do not puddle tack coat on bottom of hole. ■ ,p 6.. AN top of hole with type S bituminous concrete and compact VVV In lifts no more than 2" thick. Each lift should be thoroughly compacted with a vibratory plate compactor or a portable roller. Experience has shown that 15 to 20 po iy� !ry n vibratory roller and mix temperature above tamp (121 shwA y }J i I /1oQ2 necessary to ensure good compaction. Rand tamp shou/ y 1 L be used for small areas (less than f sf) 7. Clean up area. Do not leave excess fil/ or xcowted material on the powment. Remow safety signs. Replacement of Existing Bituminous Pavement _ City of 'So. Qjl'n9t0n N. T.S r� C Storm Water System Maintenance Schedule 1. The storm water system is comprised of any portion of the site Construction Note_ _ that directs or conveys water 1. The methods and materials of construction shall conform to the latest standards of 2. Catch basin sumps and Storm water tanks should be inspected regularly the State of Vermont and City of South Burlington, a// work shall be in conformance and cleaned as required. with o// permits and approvals issued for the project. In case of conNict, the more stringent specir/cation shall apply os directed by Engineer A// work she// be done n III c�,� J. All ditches and swales must be inspected regularly and repaired as in a workmanlike manner and completed in the time specified by Owner i required. Special attention must be given to winter time ice conditions. 2. The Contractor shall be responsible for al/ work and materials shown and required to Sid-11, ramp, w/ a te,wred .arteae g_6^ min, 4. Each year a written report shall be submitted to: make the job complete. These drawings do not show every fitting or appurtenance. A fie Department of Environment/ Conservation Materials shall be as specified on the drawings. Monulocturei's product yob !' B �- NPDES Permit Section specirlcations shall be submitted for a// materials to the Engineer for approval Annex Building 103 prior to installation. c -: A South Moir Street J. fie location and size of existing underground utilities is not warranted to be exact � c c crp., ,etp woterbury, Vermont 05676 or complete. fie Contractor shall Ae/d locate all utilities and shall contact the affected utility company, the Engineer and the City of South Burlington prior to making 5. The report shall provide the dates and nature of cleaning operations any hook ups. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for a// existing utilities 9 carried out in the preceding year. and their uninterrupted services. Al/ off -site backN/l, sheeting and shoring, dewatering, clearing and grubbing, erosion control, dust control, traffic control 6. fie Owner shall be responsible for submission of al/ reports to the State Vermont Environmental Conservation. groding, and o// incidentals shall be included as part of the required work. of Deportment of 4. Repair of a// disturbed areas, grading, seeding, mulching, repair of roads and curbs Narrow sinNa ow Grose on TStriaangent. paving, and other incidentals are included as part of the required work. All Single Roma On Corner Radius. disturbed areas shall be loomed and mulched until permanent ground cover is Narrow Grass Strip Between established. Sidewalk and Curb 5. fie Contractor shall verify all temporary bench marks before use. 8 6. The workmen and public shall be protected by the Contractor from any and off hazards connected with the construction work. Open trenches, materials or equipment within swwmx Ramp z.s'� i"--' c..w.•e> �, +/a^ nwa c„� lron.nlpn the workinglimits are to be guarded b the use of adequate barricades or No men. 9 Y q 9 3z Ro,dway 5ldewalk Ramp I Al/ barricades left in position overnight are to be properly lighted. Kerosene pots ir•.lw•,l are not acceptable. When work narrows the usable pavement, Nogmen sho/l be employed _ to aid the Now of traffic so that there will be no undue delays. fie Contractor taro shall be held responsible for the safety of a// workmen and the general public and SECTION A -A �� all damages to property occurring from or upon the work occasioned by negligence or SECTION C-C otherwise growing out of a failure on the part of the Contractor to protect persons or property from hazards of open trenches, materials or equipment at any time of the day or night within the working area. All work shall be /n conformance to OSHA regulations, Tit/e 19, Ports 1925..651 and 1926.652, and applicable to ✓OSHA regulations 9 PP 9 Au.m y Te,lured A-on�y eldewak ramp �= 7. fie Contractor shall verify all utility intersections and contact Engineer and Owner—� Rounding—�+ 5'—ems min. wWN nsx es with conflicts - 6. The Contractor shall call, Dig Safe prior to any excavation. SECTION B-B NOTE: 9. Layout of site plan was provided by Architect. Contact City of South Burlington to confirm romp speciflcotions prior to 10. The Contractor shall coordinate final location and inverts for water, sewer, and storm construction. building connections with the Architect, Structural Engineer, and Mechanical Engineer. Sidewo/k Romo Detoi/ � •^,., 11. All new sonitcry pipes shall be laid with a loser to elevation and slope as shown on the plans. N.T.S. 12. The Contractor shall sowcut a// existing pavement to be removed. fie Contractor shall minimize the pavement area disturbance from trench excavation and/or regrading. A DR d 71 §2 Ci O General Grodinq and Site Work Notes Y. kf!%�y 1. Al/ area disturbed and all areas within the clearing //mits shall be graded and covered with a minimum of 4" (10.2 cm) of compacted loam dent a/- shall be lveli nt All concrete used An coestmcff n ^ on -extruding cal/u/or fiber of concrete pads shoji be air f Qh /binl, u,11ormly saturated entrained (5 - 7 [) and made with to soil. The areas to be loomed shall be free and clear of roots, p with asphdt, oflerhg a Portland cement. The -crete shall waste moteiio/ and other deleterious material. Topsoil shall be spread and lightly compacted to a depth of 4" (10.2 cm). Topsoil shall be approved by the Engineer. All side slopes are to be loomed. minimum of 7alf recovery meet sect/on 501 of the Stote of attar rompMeel n. Vermont Standard Spedncat/on for Cross B concrete and how 26 day -Anchor boles with stokes prior to poNng. Use ant! -spoiling to concrete compressive strength of 4.000 psi. Hay bdas I _ 2. All turf establishment shall be in accordance with Section 651 of pods according to manufactures the VT Standard Specifications 1990.. Mulching shall follow seeding by recommendation. ProNde exponei- ,bent where pods meets the curifhuiYd/ng. L t grate no more than 24 hours T Jca/ o// In/et 9etas J. All cut slopes shall be no steeper than 3h on I All rill slopes F---- ' ... Curb shall be no steeper than 2.5h on N. -� i 4. The Contractor shall not disturb any existing ground after October xpensian ,hint 15th, unless approved by the Engineer. Protection < - —}- - a 5 Temporary silt fence shall be erected prior to any clearing or construction. _inlet Fencing moy be erected in phases but in no case shall construction 44 6" N TS of clearing proceed fencing. Special areas may be designated by the Owner for preservation of existing trees. These areas sho// be the Contractor's responsibility to insure no damage is done to designated trees.- L=III=III=I I I -I I =i I I=III=I —III-III I I I I I, I I I I I 6. Existing plantings are located in genera/ areas as shown on this _= .. =III=III=III-III-III- - - - - I plan. Contractor shall protect plantings so as not to damage these Subbos J-I I —------- - Date r.Naed oeecrwno., cnecaon - oar• -- --- -- or their root systems. 6' leveling course Daeign WN Details _ 7. Slope stability based upon unsaturated soil conditions if during 12" crushed grovet sea road cross section construction saturated soils are encountered, contact the Engineer detair and notes. ado"` I �bthG Drown _t6,6 Lakeview at immediately o��?"°H"A�o 9y a - Checked Scale n.l.s. 6'-� NO 5Y03 •s oncrrate_.Pad Details ----- N.f ,s.,a•, Date AoN/ 16. 2002 Pi/lsbur Y Pro act She/borne Rood -Route 7 South BuN/n ton ✓ermont X"WS d' L4YSING Consulting Irigineers, Ina µ D-2 PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY >B4l Ifain Stree4 Colchester, Vermont 05446 �M° J 0+1' req to mote* ex/at A. Conlraetor shed be T Use 112 o/%wob pipe deflection rod to achieve 5' separation. ft � o we for om 6'g pOoaO pooared MgrtNy regu/ot/ s L L/Z catch Fkror boakNr more -Jai enwr basin contoh o stones greater 959 95T than 3` (76 ) In dkmret-,, no ' stenderd slandord �- or sown Nrnps, day a proctor proctor - organic mnterfd. - (AASYM-r-") water main dry well Proce k, 12' (Sa5 ) de: end - 8 compact os erdi-W.. .� E _ E m mural :2; (s f ..) .. bee Band N/ / &a N/ - hounchfhg and Antra/ beekN/ -pact//e Jrar d52 2" insulation (high density styrofoom) N 1OiY1�'g one full length of pipe. - c pant ands pipe - Undsulurbed maleNp/-� rhtk.+l4treonrcM Otov-Werta equodY �emin. 6' be/, aM(1 cuehkm52 /edge Catch -Basin_ /_Water Separation Al. T S. Typico/ Water Trench Detoi/s_ N. T.S $ Area of bear,_- • -poss 9' concrete- _ago.. undJslurbed north Undisturbed earth Section _E/evatlon Frome snow Neenah R-1642, /// Finis! grade Anchorq-Qe of Valves Lebamn Lc 266 or s1aPe to dram N01e -/ A thrust block shall be mstaded at d/ water main bands w/ros, reducers end cops and tees. Grout from. to brick -----� P escak bricks beforo---Sridr /eve!!ng course mortoring (5) coupes max. �-MM/mum one _ 6" 2 courses min. Undisturbed nail Use megalug ( ) AA/ length of PIP. T a' Do not mortor Inside face of brick. containers Burled gate valor Use red hardened sewer brick only with concrete support � ° A57M C478 Procost reinforced concrete manhole nd cow and nte n bordetad above -- �•• - - - - + - (see, buried P�odde cost In place by Came Procost, arriswdd or equal 9 % step-- when depth e9 exceeds 6' from in TT" 6' (152 cm) min. Plug -�L.. • ; � ,• .. _ to mwt. � 0' Ring gasket or Mastic into trench will - Use poQprooyrene (tjPJ_ .r•(�'; 'Undisturbed soil plastic rungs with 4=0` 1/2' grade 60 steel o Do not mortar Inside face Volve/bead End Reducer_ renfo cement or .gun[ of manhole. Note: P/ace 3 mil. Undisturbed soil-- poijathjfene sheet between a Monho/e shill be roouum tested g d/ cmoreta t't blocks 5• while lowest pint is still exposed and pps/w fitbhgs to prevent bond. Asphdt coated Cost in place or p/e9s-se0! -- - gosket for a// ppe penetrations. _ Cl..B concrete or • 8` min. Concrete shod not cows red hardened brick ° °}• n ' bolts etc. of Atlinga shelf and /n t o 1 Undisturbed sod D j j jj F/ow - Tee 90e,45 ,22 112' 1 4' 'moo d or 11 1/4-8end r6 : `• • • � • - Monollthic base sect/an 12'mme m Thrust Block _ Details 3/4 to , 112 shed ----- _.: AiTS - �- --- Undisturbed mat erid compacted stone Minimum Area of Bearinq Surface of Concrete Thrust Block (in square feet) J•1 4' 1 6' 8` 12' SOIL COND177W WT WAMNG [ Sras. aAa(P IQ5 aer we • u.r /rear ♦ uu • m• nsr m a&r m• azr 0.5 0.3 Q5 O.5 LO Q5 1.5 1.0 Q5 20 25 L5 1 AO 5.5 JO LS Sound shore 10,000 1.0 f.0 Q5 LS 2.01.0 J010. 4.02.01.0 4.5 6.53.5 Z.O 1Q014. 7.54.0 sand 4,000 1, L0 QS 2.0 0.5 1.5 50 JO 1.5 60 85 50 2.5 1JO1d5 faO 5.0 ypa eyed A000 1.5 2.5 1.5 LO 2.5 J5 2.0 7.5 4.0 2.0 9.01107.0 J5 027.. 15080 be oiledcare2,000 JO 4.5 25 1.5 5.0 70 40 150 80 40 18.025 14.0 70 55 15 SoN cloy 71ow - - -- - - Mor9num wvfv p�exwro 2IX1 Ps (144&V ke/mi ) Tgica/ Precast Manhole N.T.S NOW:. 1. So~ relations to water mains shall be /n accordance with the Recommended Stondords for Sewage Wails" so-called Ten Slate Standards and water -Ripply Rules. 2. Sewers shall be /aid at /eosl 10 feet (3.0 m) horizontally from any ex/stamg or proposed water mph- The distance sho// be measured edge to edgeif this d/stonce cannot be obtdned, then the pees shall be Installed occord/ng to these tjplco/ deta .. J 18' (45.7 cm) separation must be maintained whether water is ow or under sewer. Water main--_--_-_� 18` min. (45.7 cm) O Sewer --select bock/!/l compacted In 6` (15.2 amJ /oyez,-95•S standard proctor density. Sewers crossing water mains shot/ be laid to pro Wde a minimum wtlwl distance of 18" (45.7 cm) between pipes Sewer )b1Ws wd/ be equidstan ! and os to, as pas re from the water main joints Nhen it is f si to obtain proper sego -0e the s h cjps(gned and constructed aqua to o ! 0o7�'�be Pressure tested to assur t ti to prior to bockAlling Sewer Water SepanoNo, Deta ® _ N.Abra rile re t eo 1 DM *thn - 1 Dote 3��Par � Ahura Design ._W/N r awn A D Details �P'CA won�Hnbx'P't!Qyy - Sneak°° L ake VieW at Scale ht.. Date Aar!/ f6. 2002 Pillsbury 'ion iiiiN•"' pro ct She/bume Rood - Route 7 South Budin ton Vermont XJlhBS d Z4,4rSINC Consulting B'ngineerss Inc. F q D-3 PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY 164 AifaEn Street' Colchester, Vermont 05446 PAWANNT CROSS COUNNY ✓o/W�co�r marked-- . _ _ t+ 'Se Storm" � Wotorlighl cop mwked "c/eonout` accord g to use. Cost eon va/w box top or approved equal. 45' b0 and spigot elbow (4 f Fiber packing between pipe and v/w box. PVC SOR 35 4' PVC SOR 35 Pow /-45' wye for in line deonouts (6' X 49 45' ball and spigot for to mina! deonouts (reduce to 4J Sanito - StormC/eanout_ Detai/_ -- NT.S _.........__-- Catch Basin Size Mox. Pi e Diameter 3d/a 1.7 4, d1a _ 5 aVa 6 d/a JB The catch bosin sl ahel be [arga- than indicated /n the adQbcenl abort If the rocmnmended number of po" penetrating the latch bask, is exceeded A// catch bash —be/ be /o/d agahst the curb whpe mahtalnl g U/ access Coaarere curb, see detak Fran, and grate, — L.%mn LF246-2 a- egad. to mob (wtth ainJ L16— LK120A /f a/ape /s groat-^ than SX (See ut7/fy P/on) rkr/en woab non-sh Nk grt ----' CUortvhefs r PfeNde cost h P/ace - ps when depth -,teed' Sy dh—t Coeeh bosin by C p, Orisw&d or -quo% 6' from nor to /overt out - - A.STM spec C476 66 Use c ayrner p&yProp�tene Z - 4,000 PS concrete p/ostic rungs with 1/2 - Ste& rekrforced to A57U Specs. 60 steel. reinforcement �2' - AASHTO H-20 wheel. load ar -quo% i. Mori omhNm[s-� °• ° \o IWtmproo/aeo/ with M oc. O' nog --_. _. "•' non-shrhk gr t. ar utJrope. b1 a O�0 Flow -- - f M WYhic base 24 Fkst )bm eho// / / be h/gher ehon nt out W.- J . 6�-., —/ `---3/4' to 1 112' mashed stone Undr's[urbed material.------- _Tjpica/ Catch Basin N.T.S. RFC, of so Ifng to match ewbt 10 012' fie Cavtrocfor ah&/ be for comp/Jtirg Pawd unpa wd povA+g to match sxbtkr with OSHA with OSHA - VOSHA mound .M/ght/y Tfrs Canfmctor shall be unporod regulot/ reaponsM/e /or comp/Jhg w/th OSi/A - WSHA Dowd mound sNgh1/y rsg&ct/ona. Bock1A/ moterlo/ shall 95X 95x ` g loofah no stones greofel than 3" h diamerM, no tandord staodo ./ p actor proctor ' BockfO/ mote;& Shall. & 9.5.t" 95x �- f/aZen /amps, day a, $ ontom no stones greater stondord stond q( mgwk• moferi& than J' In dbmeter, no proof- Prada" P/oce h 12" lilts and trot-; lumps, day or e pocl as mdkrot d. - F `l P/oceorgmt m 12t b�a mid Ag CYr i(e ssand fA/ — -2- lompoct os inalccat'd. E �n 114" to 314" 1 ' ' mashed start- + -- 6 ADS-W2, PlC musYed store —G � UWbe.lbed mated& sm 35 afavm , 6 Pm S}7R 35 sanitary Undisturbema d te;al---_ and smw'oex Typical. Stolm_Detaft Typical. Sanitary Trench Details N.SS__— I__-__ Dale reNaed Deacrlptron Ghecksd Dote Design _�/✓ Details `NaowlEteor/ N Nees Drawn .....--. Dheakad Lckev/ew at ;y,� Pillsbury Rr/uiinnw�'"`` Date Ap„ 16�002 xr tt a111i P°YO°'. Pro' ct .00127 - She/burn- Rood �- Route 7 South Burl%n tan, t/ermont ARZ8S a@ UYUfAC Consulting Fngineers, /nc .-- n 4,ow D— 4 PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY /0 Alain Street, Colchester, Fermont 0"-ff Note.. Sed'ment shod be cleaned out when It has reached half the height of the fence or before mgrbr predicted rainfall events Remora silt fence oiler successful establishment Of wgetatlon. Steal stokes oWwn on downstream side of lance 2'x?'x J' stokes .—top edges Show fence or MraA Endrofence MIroA Envrrolence a rt ,vote Mkorr, too, 9/ter fabric Filter fobn'c an upstream side staple fabric to fence Form 11' des trench Stoke A baled hay or allow embankment slope toy fWio in bottom cover with grow! ante existing ground Ballast F/ow II E ,50• I II NOTE., To be used kr locations where the I I I I I I I ex'stmg ground sigoes in toward the toe of the embankment + I I I I To be installed at 50' to 75' 2"x2"x)'stokes Section A —A J I,I V inter -Is depending an pnch, ' - A or os shown on plops Plon Kew Baled H_o or Strove Erosion Checks Typical_ Tempoori/t Fence __� _ Erosion Control Barrier N. T.S N. T.s Erosion Control Notes 1. The limit of disturbance shall be clearly defined by Engineer prior to clearing. Erosion control shall be established to trap sediment on site. 2. The site shall then be cleared and grubbed. All roots, stumps and deleterious materials shall be removed from the site. fie Contractor shall minimize the amount of disturbed land at any given time. J. All erosion controls shall be installed as detailed in the publication Vermont Handbook for Sol? Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites. 4. All erosion control shall be placed as shown on the drawings or as ordered by the Engineer. The Contractor shall maintoin the erosion control measures until the Engineer is sotisffed that permanent ground cover is established and that further measures are not required. 5. fie erosion controls shall be checked regularly by the Engineer. Any necessary repairs or modir/cations shall be immediately completed by the Contractor. 6. All excess material and topsoil shall be stockpiled /n areas approved by the Engineer. 7hese stockpiles shall be surrounded by hay bole erosion control dams and shall be seeded and mulched to minimize erosion potential as directed by Engineer. 7. As disturbed areas are graded and topsolled, they will be seeded and mulched to reduce the erosion potential of the soll. B. Any drainage swa/es with a slope greater than 5R' shall use a stone lining for stabilization. See Engineer for detail. 9. When erosion control measures are deemed no longer necessary, a// materials detained, including silts and construction runoff debris, shall be collected and disposed of in o manner acceptable to the Engineer. 10. The Contractor shall use water and/or calcium chloride for dust control. 11. The Contractor shall provide hay bole inlet protection around each catch basin prior to pavement and turf establishment. See Detail Sheet. 12. The Contractor shall sweep Howard Johnson Parking lot and new pavement as directed by the Engineer to maintain dust control. 1J. All erosion controls shall be installed prior to October 1 for winter construction. 14. Additional erosion controls shall be installed as directed by the Site Engineer. 15. fie Engineer will regularly inspect the erosion controls in place to ensure their proper installation. 16. All disturbed areas not involved in winter construction shall be mulched and seeded before October 1. 17, All winter construction areas will be stabilized by mulch for winter/spring meltdowns and when winter construction has halted. Note., sedi evt ono// be cleoned oat when it has reached half the height of the hay bale or before major predicted rainfall swots Remow hay bales alter succ—(u/ establishment of wgstobi Hoy bole bom/er - 2 -- of boles stagger joints — Set bole into bank - t be msto/led of 50' to intervals, depending on pitch , or as shown on Steel stakes driven through boles (ar erect snow fence on downstream side of bales) Pico/ Temporary Hoy Bole Erosion Control _Barrier_ N, r.S In areas where freeboard is owhab/e use 1 an 2 backs/apes - seed and mulch 1� r — 2 m/n. d as r 0.75 T _Parabolic Grossed Waterway Section N. T.S ".' Alter (or use Alter fabric - MiroA 100x- set Into ground and Axed over hay boles) public right-of-way 4', r -X — min. Exfstfng ground-- PFON/e Provide oppropnote trons/tian between Stobdaed contract/an Entrance and Public Right of {t 'v m0n Pub/ic E t 20• 1 112" to 2" Right of I g o nd crushed stone way Plan Stobi/ized Construction Entrance N. rs `-Genera nxv/ 0 as Wd s Lenrimoire 013s /00 roll, Mefad Halide r' -csnwol aecrrra t/phtAg pole (ASxS'Jef /-Boas coror — see,aaw�amfe:a rsnvdareadorkva lw- mweora,a. Single Luminaires RECE/V ED APR .a 7 2002 Cil�/ � f 01� s� U �• , �. Dare re.;aw asaptiw, 'W� oats Design WN Details a�aer V) Drawn --Lb—_,— ��w°�°°z Checked — Lekeview at * No 5�o3'-j A Scale n.1 a __, 3 1 Date Pillsbury Alorl/ 6, ?001 Project She/bum- Rood - Route 7 South Burlington. ✓ermant AjURS & Z4WFb G Consulting Fnpneers, Inc. °D—J PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY f0 Alain Shve4 Colchester, lrermont 054W CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNTfNNG ZONi E\-TG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMOP TT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Ms. Patricia Moulton-Powden, Chair, and Members Vermont Environmental Board National Life Records Building Montpelier, VT 05620 Re. John Larkin, Inc. Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-1iR-(2)-EB Dear Ms. Moulton-Powden and Members of the Board, I understand. that there may be some question regarding the absence of a representative of the City of South Burlington at the public hearing held on July 27, 2005 regarding Land Use Permit Application #4Co526-iiR-(2)-EB. It was not at all apparent to me from the pre -filed testimony that a City representative would be needed to provide information and I regret that I did not attend. This letter will confirm that the City of South Burlington continues to support strongly approval of the project as described in the application. The Planning Commission believes the project is consistent with the planned character of the area in which it is proposed, provides access to transit, walking paths, and other appropriate transportation facilities for senior housing, and has undergone extensive design changes that have been proposed to reduce the total fagade area and mass of the building. Again, the City continues to stand behind the conditions and basis for its approval of the project. If I can provide further information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Juli Beth blinds, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning cc: Chris Jensen, Esq. L L41 01©d U WI Is -sue �e,�r=ems. 0T ej SS '' G� ✓t,�- al- , Z a�w 0- O&apt. JC2-a-) 'f' 7� a 4- cnt c � , `8 0 ma& - V60-ibLt-1 vnakt- tf b&nd . `' QIWOY U J-j !; I�'' �11 �� 1 I Bil F I I 1[ 11 Lakeview@ Pillsbury So. Burlington, Vermont ILL 1I J;. t � . is e �' i Y�yyr „ � ♦ x 1 Lt, � ���+j Y. • w'�Ri•''' �'d.H!!�' a"�3-�n ••� �,. '����:.r iRr sr i�' -- , � �� f � r Noirr- (� 0 H Q, b O N 11 »� P A CO AL 2 a emuq �k.m G+ J y°y a>.�efr soot r� J .,e asn» �.maor r h �r nA v --------�-- Lloh�aU/s a--- )wrwImo` �Ir �}— \ (IpX mta�/ Aua „eoe ytr ,.VIFlr r ewW pvW 1 � I ♦ t � � FMr I�t NO w M MM Mtl 4M �I (er wyr aD asns �.r �.y Ib...A. kerNv se tonmavr nry `. �\ rCaunwrM rW Lpsr .haw - as � ..✓ _ /%//" �. `a � \ �,� r�vdaN,le+w LOCOl%On AIOD ZAned: RSSIDENT[AL a � \ soei.. rroai .rcw.. .A+ �ordrp eN. tu.N [ % r�i / /•' � V, R" Rrr r� "` ""� , \\\ \ 9"',a„"';,,� , ;,°""Ny Plonnft and Zan/no /n/dmat/Ao 7r ';. �• Arr u,s Ane it rnr Cb— rrbo7t — P. tee., Nc t.l .... (7a «...� - ",227 ef. i$r'a , ' P - \ \ M• F s . s 91- K asrar (ear) - �-74Ft mo ai �� t., ca'°. v - nu ( \ \ \ \ wwe \ ,., \\ .t z F ff rrddAA...�' e- 746JI a[ AL Pyaerl eJM/AIM wrd� p�Ar /Jis axrr - d.7x / \ / _ ^4 . j' , ♦ \~ , ' `��\ \ \ yd�'lS/-ff 71 aria- —z.,e+ R— - X /eN 6 fr.v n.ndimt✓d aw.� \ n r.rr sate.»- aoocea lr o rover .,e.w ro.w rf J° my wrewr \ � I e/ %/t�����o:= )�-�)` 11\III11 \\ „\v\ �4 s..\ 1\A_✓ �. ^ �1 �\\ \\, ne XC �n�G n°' tom'♦ v+ •M 1 � .,, nbGeW AWN a �Sr�f7-O- �a+rN s�mr ..mow 9. AR SCALE 1-.0• h I I o.w.� 5/ta P/on — — — — _ — — — — — — maw — —. — F-\ �.„£ — — _ _ — — _ b ex • - mares �.t, I d..n Lakeview ai P///sbury ,- .:`. r .. .,. , .un.♦od tMa♦ r \ 7 �7ee'as t uvsirc c r anG ..r�uir. �,'eAr R9, r� J7eG. � ) i \� u « 16I 67atit .S[rve� Colo.Lr[ea; Vermon[ st `. ® ` S nm at/ µ as a.- � �� a■ ia� � - a a� a •a = � � O `S y7ii fl w aa�nuuon■u■uo�� ■ CM<sr A Bq Cart Cax l Zoned: RESIDENTIAL 4 LWu4K O INNOVATIVE DESIGN, INC. ~'-08-02 r 78 MILLER LANE I- . 30, L . E ® PILLSBURY =ElloN, ese-awe VT. 03403 �, e,, sau a.Yp v.,.,,e awe (wzl a w-aeis F."=e. m,m, ...•., °— r.Arrnsr.Aara, -----------------' ; tw � lbpth 'MM I.W 1r(p JfM 41M SICO 6tQ0 Site Cross Section Site Cross Section Lakeview of Pi//sbury e' t fis SauN IaA Ymnc iJPB6S G LINS/NG Caruv[hi�q dY{q�iverr<ti hu. -�"'� 1S4 ,Pain Sbreq Colchester, f'rrmont 05446 X7 M ; tti Jam~ 7- Lakeview @ Pillsbury So. Burlington, Vermont SITE LAYOUT <9 Boy C rt Haber Heights No Text No Text �.- �"'y_.._ �. �„ �.� „� � .�:�rav = �� .a,. �-- No Text s'. =t } .. - o. f1 F *a3 �r t . i , taw.. r r. _ f� � � kYlt ..�.. ., s 1 u�y. . ,gip • ;�i, _ .a+.euaan+• .b.,..Re„e.,. � aar _ � ;4-itiiii.�i��� i_ fkti r, rsrwwrrn„, 'Y 4{ - � i; .I.IWI� t �t 4 �A •. n.. No Text tv4x.. f 1 Photo Location Plan 0' 500 7500' 3000 5000' L aloe view a t Pills,b �� Bar scale 1 - 1000, ury •- Febrvwy 2J 2M0 10-2002 dw ..: ;Js'n'�' 25.106 The Planning Commission may reduce the frontage requirements for lots on the outside curved portions of a cul-de-sac to 50% of the normal frontage requirement if it determines that such reduction would improve lot layout. 25.107 Front Yard Setbacks - Non -Residential - In the case of nonresidential uses, not more than 30% of the area of the required front yard setback shall be used for driveways and parking and the balance shall be suitably landscaped and maintained in good appearance. No portion of the required front yard setback shall be used for storage or for any other purpose except as provided in this section. In addition, a continuous strip 15 feet in width traversed only by driveways and sidewalks, shall be maintained between the street r.o.w. line and the balance of the lot, which strip should be suitably landscaped and maintained in good appearance. This provision shall apply also to yards which abut a right-of-way designated for a future street. 25.108 Buffer strip - Where new nonresidential uses are adjacent to or within 50 feet from the boundary of a Residential District, the required side or rear yard shall be increased to 65 feet and a strip not less than 15 feet shall be maintained as a buffer and shall be suitably landscaped with dense evergreen or other suitable planting as a screen. 25.109 No space which for the purpose of a building or dwelling has been counted or calculated as part of a side yard, front yard, or other open space required by this ordinance may be counted or calculated to satisfy or comply with a yard or space requirement of or for any other building. 25.110 No land development may be permitted on lots which do not have either frontage on a public road or public waters, unless, with the approval of the Planning Commission, such lots have access to a public road or waters by a permanent easement or right-of-way at least 20 feet in width. Approval of permanent easements or rights -of -way shall be, in accordance with Section 26.20 25.111 Pre-existing small lots - any lot held in individual and separate and non-affiliated ownership from surrounding properties in existence on the effective date of these regulations, and thereafter, may be developed for any use allowed as a permitted or conditional use in the district in which it is located even though not contorming to minimum lot size requirements, if such lot is not less than 118 acre in aiea with _._a minimum width -or depth dimension of 40 feet. — -- -- --- —__- - -- �_ 25.112 No shrubbery shall be erected, maintained, or planted on any lot which obstructs or interferes with traffic visibility. In the case of corner lots, the restricted area shall be the triangular area formed by the lot lines along the streets and a line connecting them at points 30 feet from the intersection. 25.113 Height of Structures Except as otherwise provided under Sections 11.40 (Queen City Park District), 14.403 (Central District), and 7.501(d) (RI-PUD Lakeshore) of these regulations, structures in all districts shall comply with the height standards below: (a) Except as allowed under subparagraphs (b), (c) and (g) below, no point of any pitched roof structure shall rise more than 40 feet, and no point of any other structure shall rise more than 35 feet, above the average preconstruction grade adjoining such structure. Maximum allowable building heights are illustrated in Exhibit 25A. (b) For applications undergoing site plan review or subdivision review (e.g. multi -family buildings, P.U.D.'s, P.R.D.'s, etc), the Planning Commission may approve an increase in height for a residential structure up to 45 feet if the Commission determines that a taller structure: 25.3 O I AVE"I YfrtON57XWt10M 6f40E Exhibit 25A Section 25.113 HEIGHT of STRUCTURES Examples of Complying Structures FLAT ROOF STRUCTURE .� r PITCHED ROOF STRUCTURE 0 l AVERAH PIROMMM710M 6RADt COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE ON SLOPE (�) PITCHED ROOF STRUCTURE ON SLOPE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE w/ GABLE DORMER �- AVERAGE PRE-COWTAUM7 GRADE 51NGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE w/SHED DO VA ER 25.4 (i) Will utilize topography and will relate to other existing and proposed structures so as to be aesthetically compatible with the neighborhood; (in) will not detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public streets and walkways; and (M) will allow retention of additional green space that will enhance the appearance of the developed property. (c) Except as provided in subsection (g) below, the Planning Commission may approve a non- residential structure with a height in excess of the limitations set forth in (a) above in the C 1, C2, IC, I-0, AIR, AIR I and MU zoning districts, provided the Commission determines that a taller structure: (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (u) will not detract from important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. (d) For each foot of additional height above the normal 40 foot maximum for pitched -roof structures and 35 foot maximum for all other structures established in (a), (b) and (c) above, all front and rear setbacks shall be increased by one (1) foot and all side yard setbacks shall be increased by one half (1/2) foot. For taller structures which are proposed as part of a planned unit development or planned residential development, the planning commission may waive the requirements of this section as long as the general objectives of the PUD/PRD and applicable zoning district are met. (e) request for approval of a taller structure as provided in (b) and (c) above shall include the mittal of a plan(s) showing the elevations and architectural design of the structure, existing grade, post -construction grade, and height of the structure. (1) Roohop apparatws, such.as solar collectors,.television antermas,.satellite dishes, chimneys, and air conditioning equipment shall be included in the height measurement. Chimneys for residential structures shall be exempt from the height limitations. (g) Communications towers/antennas, farm silos, and church steeples that are taller than normal height limitations established in subsection (a) above may be approved by the Board of Adjustment as a conditional use subject to the provisions of Sections 26.05. Such structures do not need to comply with the provisions of (d) above. (h) All height provisions are subject to the limitations of Section 26.45. (i) For any single-family or duplex residential structure, there shall be no more than three stories exposed on any side. Fourth story vertical extensions (i.e., dormers) not to exceed the height of the roof peak are allowed provided the total width of the extensions does not exceed 50 percent of the horizontal distance of the roof line. Vertical extensions which exceed 50 percent of the horizontal distance (i.e., stepdormers) are limited to a maximum height of 5 feet. (j) For the purpose of regulating height under this section, preconstruction grade shall be defined as the grade existing on property on the date of an application under the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance for any development approval (variance, conditional use approval, zoning permit, site 25.5 plan approval), unless another grade has been established as the preconstruction grade pursuant to Section 25.117 below. Where land receives subdivision approval from the Planning Commission, the grade shown on the approved subdivision plat shall constitute the preconstruction grade, unless modified in accordance with Section 25.117 below. 25.114 Minimum Size of Dwelling Units Except as allowed under Sections 14.405 and 26.75 of these regulations, minimum floor area, excluding unfinished basements and attics, porches, garages, and other space not customarily used for living space, shall be 425 square feet per unit for a multi -family structure and 864 square feet per unit for a single- family detached and two-family detached structure. Floor area shall be computed measuring the outside dimensions of the building. 25.115 Reduction of Lot size No lot shall be so reduced in area that the lot size, frontage, coverage, setbacks, or other requirements of these regulations shall be smaller than herein prescribed for each district. 25.116 Satellite dishes Satellite dishes shall not be located within the area between the street line and the building (the actual front yard). Satellite dishes shall be suitably screened. 25.117 Alteration of Existing Grade: (a) The placing of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material on land in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot, shall require the prior approval of the Zoning Board of Adjustment, except that the Planning Commission may grant such approval where such modification is requested in connection with the approval of a site plan or subdivision plat. The Zoning Board of Adjustment or Planning Commission shall review a request under this Section for comnliance with the standards contained in Sections 25.117(c) and (d), and Section 25.1.13(b)(i) - (iiil of tl!£�P_IPgpl�tioii (b) The removal of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material from land in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot, shall require the prior approval of the Zoning Board of Adjustment, except that the Planning Commission may grant such approval where such modification is requested in connection with the approval of a site plan or subdivision plat. The Zoning Board of Adjustment or Planning Commission shall review a request under this Section for compliance with the standards contained in Sections 25.117(c) and (d), and Section 25.113(b)(i) - (iii) of these regulations. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a resource extraction operation (see Section 26.35). (c) An application under Section 25.117(a) and (b) above shall include the submittal of a site plan showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or addition of material. (d) The Zoning Board of Adjustment or Planning Commission, in granting approval under Section 25.117(a) and (b) above may impose any conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following: 25.6 RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP I N C O R P O R A T E D Traffic Impact Study: BARTLETT LOT 10 ELDERLY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT South Burlington, Vermont Prepared for: KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. April 2002 331 Olcott Drive, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 BARTLETT LOT 10 ELDERLY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, HARBOR VIEW DRIVE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................................1 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................................3 2.2 SCENARIOS TO BE ANALYZED.......................................................................................................3 3.0 EXISTING & FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES........................................................................................4 4.0 DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC....................................................................................................................6 4.1 TRIP GENERATION...........................................................................................................................6 4.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION.........................................................................................................................7 4.3 BUILD TRAFFIC CONDITIONS..........................................................................................................8 4.4 CUT -THROUGH TRAFFIC...............................................................................................................12 5.0 CONGESTION ANALYSIS..................................................................................................................13 5.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION...................................................................................................13 5.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS......................................................................................................13 6.0 SAFETY ANALYSIS............................................................................................................................15 7.0 SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................16 Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 page 2 List of Figures Figure 1: Location of Proposed Elderly Housing Development........................................................................ 2 Figure 2: Estimated 2003 No -Build Traffic Volumes........................................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Estimated 2008 No -Build Traffic Volumes........................................................................................... 6 Figure 4: Distribution of Vehicles Generated by the Proposed Development ................................................. 7 Figure 5: Distribution of Vehicles Generated by the Proposed Development after the Shelburne Road (US 7) Project...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 6: Estimated 2003 Build Traffic Volumes................................................................................................... 9 Figure 7: Estimated 2008 Build Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................10 Figure 8: Estimated 2003 Build Traffic Volumes after the Shelburne Road (US 7) Project .........................11 Figure 9: Estimated 2008 Build Traffic Volumes after the Shelburne Road (US 7) Project .........................11 Figure 10: Distribution of Vehicles Generated by the Proposed Development.............................................12 List of Tables Table 1: Design Hour Volumes at CTC D002, 1998 — 2001............................................................................... 4 Table 2: Trip Generation by Land Use for the PM Peak Hour........................................................................... 6 Table 3: Level -of -Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections..........................................13 Table 4: PM Peak Hour Level -of -Service Analysis Results................................................................................14 Table 5: PM Peak Hour Level -of -Service Analysis Results after Shelburne Road (US 7) Project...............15 Table 6: Recent Accident History for Intersections within the Study Area....................................................16 I . "m -4 84 25, 1.0 INTRODUCTION I This study is an analysis of the traffic impacts associated with the proposed elderly housing development located in the Bartlett commerce park, Lot 10, in South Burlington, Vermont. To evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed expansion, we conducted the following tasks: I■ Conducted two site visits to observe and count traffic in the area proximate to the site; ■ Estimated the number of new vehicle trips due to the proposed development; • Evaluated 2003 future traffic congestion for the weekday PM peak hour of traffic I for selected intersections; ■ Analyzed the incidence and probability of the cut -through traffic generated by the proposed development; ■ Reviewed traffic safety for the study area. Based on our understanding of local traffic issues and on the traffic concerns and safety raised by the ICity of South Burlington, the following intersections were analyzed for congestion: ■ Shelburne Road/Allen Road ■ Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive ■ Shelburne Road/Collins Boulevard (private road) 1 This traffic impact study focuses on PM peak hour conditions. The rationale for focusing on this time period is described in Section 4.0. This study relies upon design standards and analysis procedures documented in the 2000 Higbway Capacity Manual', Trip Generation Handbook, and Traffic Impact Evaluation: Study and Review Guide3. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION IThe elderly housing project is located east of Shelburne Road, and situated on Collins Boulevard, which accesses both Shelburne Road and Harbor View Drive. Figure 1 shows a general layout of the . site. 1 Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Highway Capacity Manual, Washington DC, 2000. 2 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Handbook 616 Edition, Washington DC, 1998. 3 VTrans, Planning & Traffic Research Division, Traffic Impact Evaluations: Study and Review Guide,1995. Bartlett lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 Figure 1: Location of Proposed Elderly Housing Development page 2 The study area is bounded by Shelburne Road to the west, Allen Road to the south and Spear Street to the east. The major intersections nearest to the site are Shelburne Road/Allen Road and Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive. Within the study area, Shelburne Road is an arterial roadway with one lane in each direction. Each lane is 12 feet wide. Allen Road is a minor collector having exclusive left and right lanes at its approach to Shelburne Road in the westbound direction measuring 12 feet and 10 feet respectively and a 12 feet lane in the east bound direction. Harbor View Drive is a local road with one lane in each direction. At its approach to Shelburne Road, each lane is 16 feet wide. Harbor View Drive includes a shared left and right lane at its approach to Shelburne Road. Collins Boulevard is a private road with exclusive left and right lanes at its approach to Shelburne Road. Shelburne Road /Allen Road is the only signalized intersection in the study area. According to VTrans website, the Shelburne Road (US 7) corridor will be reconstructed from approximately 700 feet south of the LaPlatte River Bridge extending 3.51 miles to Imperial Drive in South Burlington. The construction includes adding a sidewalk on the East side and reconstructing the highway to include 12 foot wide lanes from the southern end of the project to Webster Road (North). The highway will be widened to two 12 foot lanes in each direction for the remainder of the project (from Webster Road (North) to Imperial Drive). A 14 foot wide raised median island with mountable curbs will separate the lanes in each direction. Six foot wide shoulders for bicycle travel, five foot wide sidewalk, a six inch vertical curb and a grass strip will be built on both sides of the highway. Sixteen openings will be provided in the median to provide for left turns and U-turns. Of these 16 Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 page 3 openings, 10 will be signalized and 6 will be unsignalized. One of the signalized openings is at the Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive intersection. 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed 23,885 sq. ft. elderly housing development is to be situated on 7.03 acres. This proposed development will have 115 units on six stories. Of these 115 units, 64 will be single bedroom units and 51 will be double bedroom units. Vehicles can enter or exit the development from two points as follows: ■ A southerly access drive located approximately 120 feet from Harbor View Drive. A second access drive located approximately 75 feet from the westerly property boundary. A total of 131 parking spaces will be provided. Of these 131 spaces, 92 will be exterior spaces with 86 exterior regular spaces and 6 exterior handicapped spaces. The remaining 39 spaces will be interior spaces. The front yard area is about 28,631 sq ft of which 1340 sq ft is occupied by roads and parking spaces. A 5 feet wide concrete sidewalk is also proposed along the parking lot and building frontage. 2.2 SCENARIOS TO BE ANALYZED The scenarios considered in this analysis are: ■ 2003 No -Build ■ 2003 Build ■ 2008 No -Build ■ 2008 Build Currently, traffic generated by the development can access Shelburne Road via the Shelburne Road/Collins Boulevard, Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive and Shelburne Road/Allen Road intersections. Shelburne Road/Allen Road is the only signalized intersection in the study area. Currently, left turns onto and from southbound Shelburne Road can be made at all the intersections. As mentioned earlier, the Shelburne Road (US 7) reconstruction will construct a 14 foot wide raised median island on Shelburne Road, which will separate the lanes in each direction. The reconstruction also includes plans to signalize the Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive intersection. With the installation of the median, left turns will be prohibited from the Shelburne Road/Collins Boulevard intersection. Thus left turning exiting traffic generated by the development will use the Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive intersection to go southbound on Shelburne Road after reconstruction. Thus, the above mentioned scenarios were analyzed for pre -construction and post -construction phases of Shelburne Road. No -Build scenarios refer to conditions that do not include traffic from the proposed elderly housing development. Build Scenarios refer to conditions including traffic from the proposed development. Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 3.0 EXISTING & FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES For this traffic impact study, Resource Systems Gmup collected PM turning movement counts and observed operations at three intersections. ■ Shelburne Road/Allen Road ■ Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive ■ Shelburne Road/Collins Boulevard (private road) The turning movement counts are provided in Appendix A. page 4 Raw traffic counts were adjusted in two ways. First, the PM turning movement counts were adjusted to reflect the design hour (DHV) of traffic for 2003 and 2008, the estimated year of build -out and five years later. The DHV is the 30d� highest hour of traffic for the year and is used as the design standard in Vermont and elsewhere. The DHV adjustment for this study is 1.2 which means that the design hour volumes analyzed for congestion are 20% higher than the raw traffic counts. All design/peak hour adjustments employ data from Continuous Traffic Counter (CTC) D002, located on Shelburne Road in Shelburne, Vermont. CTC D002 is located approximately 2.3 miles from the study area. The second adjustment is an annual adjustment, which accounts for growth in background traffic stemming from general regional growth. Historic design hour volumes are typically used to develop traffic growth rates. Table 1 shows the recent years' design hour volumes, and percentage annual changes, at CTC D002. Table 1: Design Hour Volumes at CTC D002, 1998 — 2001 Year DHV % Annual Change 1998 1679 1999 1692 0.8% 2000 1622 -4.1 % 2001 1612 -0.6% The data in Table 1 indicate that traffic in the vicinity of the project has not been increasing in recent years. To maintain a conservative approach to the analysis, the traffic analysis will assume annual growth in background traffic of 2%. The net result of these two adjustments is to increase the raw traffic volumes by 22.9% for the congestion analyses. Details of this methodology are shown in Appendix B. To estimate 2008 No -Build traffic conditions, the 2003 No -Build traffic volumes were adjusted by annual growth rate of 2%. Since there were no other permitted developments in the vicinity of the study area, traffic due to other developments was not accounted for other than through the higher than normal background growth rate (29/o). Figure 2 and 3 show the 2003 and 2008 No -Build traffic volumes. RES Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 Figure 2: Estimated 2003 No -Build Traffic Volumes 1N ro 0 m c 63 � 1 SITE 1398 1041 * � 34 � 5 41 l 69 ♦ 1334 1023 ♦ � 60 � 9 Harbor View Drive 16 1 154 1184 922 � � 108 � 195 Allen Road 140 page 5 Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis April 2002 Figure 3: Estimated 2008 No -Build Traffic Volumes 4.0 DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 6 I 4.1 TRIP GENERATION To estimate the number of new trips generated by the proposed elderly housing development, we I consulted the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. Trip generation for this project was estimated with data for Elderly Housing -Detached Housing (251) land use type. Elderly Detached housing was chosen over Elderly Attached Housing because of its higher trip rate per unit. The Elderly Detached I housing has a PM peak hour trip rate of 0.23 per unit whereas Elderly Attached Housing has a PM peak hour trip rate of 0.10 per unit. The Elderly Detached housing has a trip rate similar to that of a condominium complex and therefore reflects a greater resident independence. Table 2 lists the estimated number of vehicle trips generated by the site for the PM peak hour of adjacent street traffic. ITable 2: Trip Generation by Land Use for the PM Peak Hour Estimated Trips I Total Enter Exit 61 36 25 Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 page 7 The total PM peak hour vehicle trips are 61, with 38 entering and 25 exiting. 4.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The traffic volume generated by the elderly housing development will access Shelburne Road via the Shelburne Road/Collins Boulevard, Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive or Shelburne Road/Allen Road intersections. Resource Systems Group had previously done a traffic impact study for Irish Farm Residential Housing Project located close to the study area. The trips generated by the proposed elderly housing project were based on the Irish Farm trip distribution pattern. Figure 4 illustrates the resulting PM peak hour trip distribution and Figure 5 illustrates the resulting PM peak hour trip distribution after the Shelburne Road (US 7) reconstruction. Figure 4: Distribution of Vehicles Generated by the Proposed Development 1N o Cr ro c 10 m � 1 � 7 SITE 10 8 li � 1 10 7 11 0 li � 1 Harbor View Drive 10 2 0 ♦ � 0 � 0 Allen Road 0 Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 page 8 Figure 5: Distribution of Vehicles Generated by the Proposed Development after the Shelburne Road (US 7) Project 1N m 0 0 c L 20 � SITE 7 7t 1 20 0♦ �. L� 7 2 Harbor View Drive 1 0 L_, Z 0 21 3 * F-­111- 0 Allen Road I0 4.3 BUILD TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Figures 6, 7, 8 and 9 show the projected intersection turning movement volumes for the Build conditions for the following scenarios: 2003 Pre -construction, 2003 Post Shelburne Road reconstruction, 2008 Pre -construction, 2008 Post Shelburne Road reconstruction. These reflect the sum of the No -Build scenario plus trip generation4. 4 Minor 1 to 2 vehicle discrepancies between the No -Build, Trip Generation and Build graphics are related to rounding within the calculations. Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 Figure 6. Estimated 2003 Build Traffic Volumes 1N o cc a) E 73 � SITE 1408 ♦ 1049 � � 41 � 6 42 l 79 ♦ L 1335 1023 * [ ---- 0' 67 9 Harbor View Drive 17 154 1185 L _ 922 ♦ � 108 � 195 Allen Road 140 page 9 Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 Figure 7. Estimated 2008 Build Traffic Volumes IN o 0= a 73 � ? SITE 1548 41 1154 * � � 6 42 86 1468 73 � 10 Harbor View Drive 1125 * � 19 169 1 1304 119 � 215 Allen Road 1014 ♦ � 154 page 10 Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 page 11 Figure 8: Estimated 2003 Build Traffic Volumes after the Shelburne Road (US 7) Project tN co 0 cc C 7 � SITE 14181 41 1048 42 152 1334 67 ♦ � 15 Harbor View Drive 1024 ♦ � T 17 1 4 1185 108 � 195 Allen Road 924 � � 140 Figure 9: Estimated 2008 Build Traffic Volumes after the Shelburne Road (US 7) Project 1N cn 0 a� c .n s At SITE 1558 41 1152 42 1159 1467 ♦ " t- 73 1126 � r---11111 16 Harbor View Drive 19 1 � � 1304 119 1017 � � � 215 Allen Road 154 Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis April 2002 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 12 I4.4 CUT -THROUGH TRAFFIC Cut -through traffic on adjacent residential streets is a known concern in this area. The concerns are vehicles moving to and from the site and Spear Street. The elderly housing development will Icontribute a minor amount of cut -through traffic in the study area. There are two cut -through routes: ■ Pheasant Way ■ Bay Crest Drive -Allen Road Figure 10 shows the likely distribution of trips generated by the elderly housing development. Figure 10. Distribution of Vehicles Generated by the Proposed Development tN 6 �° Pheasant Way m E 4 10I� I SITE 10 I 7 16 19 8 � F` 1 CD 10 11 7 S CD 1 Harbor View Drive m 1 2 � 0 0 Allen Road 1• 2 IAs discussed, of the 61 PM peak hour trips generated by the development, 36 trips are entering and 25 trips are exiting the development. Of the 36 trips entering the development, 22 trips access the I development via Shelburne Road and 14 trips via Spear Street. Of these 14 trips, 8 trips access the site through Spear Street/Allen Road and 6 trips through the Spear Street/Pheasant Way. Of the 25 trips exiting the development, 16 trips access Shelburne Road and 9 trips access Spear IStreet. Of these 9 trips, 5 use the Spear Street/Allen Road intersection and 4 use the Spear mw_ Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 page 13 Street/Pheasant Way intersection. This relatively small volume of traffic will not significantly effect on the character of these residential areas. The distribution of trips accessing Spear Street via Spear Street/Allen Road or Spear Street/Pheasant Way will likely remain the same after the Shelburne Road (US 7) project reconstruction. 5.0 CONGESTION ANALYSIS 5.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION Level -of -service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing the operating conditions as perceived by motorists driving in a traffic stream. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual defines six qualitative grades to describe the Level -of -Service at an intersection. Level -of -Service is based on the average control delay per vehicle. Table 3 shows the various LOS grades and descriptions for unsignalized and signalized intersections. The delay thresholds for levels of service at signalized and unsignalized intersections differ because of the driver's expectations of the operating efficiency for the respective traffic control conditions. Table 3: Level -of -Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections --Unsignalized-- --Signalized-- LOS Characteristics Total Delay (sec) Total Delay (sec) A Little or no delay <_ 10.0 <_ 10.0 B Short delays 10.1-15.0 10.1-20.0 C Average delays 20.1-35.0 D Long delays 25.1-35.0 35.1-55.0 E Very long delays 35.1-50.0 55.1-80.0 F Extreme delays > 50.0 > 80.0 VTrans has a Level -of -service policy that is designated to maintain LOS C for the design hour for state maintained highways. However, lower LOS may be acceptable on a case -by -case analysis. 5.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS Level -of -service analyses were conducted for the Shelburne Road/Allen Road, Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive and Shelburne Road/Collins Boulevard intersections for the 2003 and 2008 No -Build and Build scenarios for the PM peak hours. The pre -construction and post - construction phases of Shelburne Road (US 7) Project were considered. The Synchro (v5) software was used to perform this analysis. Synchro includes the year 2000 procedures of the Highway Capacity Manual, and these reports are used in this analysis. Table 4 and 5 summarize the LOS analyses conducted in this study prior to and after the Shelburne Road (US 7) project. The detailed LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 Table 4: PM Peak Hour Level -of -Service Analysis Results page 14 Intersection Scenario Overall EB WB NB SB LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Shelburne Rd/ 2003 No -Build B 20 C 32 C 23 B 14 Allen Road 2003 Build B 19 C 32 C 22 B 14 2008 No -Build C 29 D 35 C 34 C 24 2008-Build C 29 D 35 C 34 C 24 Intersection Scenario Overall EB WB NB SB Left Thru Right LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Shelburne Rd/ 2003 No -Build F 59 A 6 Harbor View Rd 2003 Build F 62 A 6 (Unsignalized) 2008 No -Build F 103 B 11 2008 Build F 127 B 12 Shelburne Rd/ 2003 No -Build F 177 C 20 A 6 Collins Boulevard 2003 Build F 202 C 21 A 8 (Unsignalized) 2008 No -Build F 276 C 23 B 13 2008-Build F 322 C 24 C 17 The significant points of Table 4 are as follows: ■ For Shelburne Road/Allen Road: The overall level of service is B in 2003 No -Build and Build scenarios and C in 2008 No -Build and Build scenarios. This intersection operates at an acceptable level of service in all scenarios ■ For Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive: The level of service is F under all the scenarios. The poor level of service is directly due to delays from vehicles wishing to turn left on to Shelburne Road from Harbor View Drive. Since Harbor View Drive includes a shared left and right lane at its approach to Shelburne Road, traffic waiting to turn left on to Shelburne Road can significantly delay vehicles waiting to turn right behind them. The traffic generated by the proposed development is so small that it will not significantly affect the LOS. ■ For Shelburne Road/Collins Boulevard: This intersection operates at an acceptable level of service in all scenarios. Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 page 15 Table 5. PM Peak Hour Level -of -Service Analysis Results after Shelburne Road (US 7) Project Intersection Scenario Overall EB WB NB SB Shelburne Rd/ 2003 No -Build B 13 C 23 B 15 A 9 Allen Road 2003 Build B 13 C 23 B 15 A 10 2008 No -Build B 14 C 23 B 17 B 11 2008-Build B 14 C 23 B 17 B 11 Shelburne Rd/ 2003 No -Build A 6 C 34 A 8 A 3 Harbor View Rd 2003 Build A 7 C 32 A 9 A 3 2008 No -Build A 6 C 32 A 8 A 3 2008-Build A 7 C 33 A 9 A 3 Overall EB WB NB SB LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Intersection Scenario Shelburne Rd/ 2003 No -Build B 13 Collins Boulevard 2003 Build B 13 (Unsignalized) 2008 No -Build B 14 2008-Build B 14 The significant points of Table 5 are as follows: For Shelburne Road/Allen Road: The overall level of service remains at an acceptable levels of service in all scenarios. For Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive: The overall LOS is A is acceptable under all the scenarios after the Shelburne Road reconstruction project. This demonstrates the dramatic improvement in LOS as a result of the signalization of this intersection. For Shelburne Road/Collins Boulevard: This intersection operates at an acceptable LOS in all scenarios. 6.0 SAFETY ANALYSIS VTrans maintains an accident reporting system, which is a statewide database of all reported accidents. A reportable accident is a collision or crash with at least one of the following results caused by the event: property damage exceeding $1,000, personal injury, or fatality. Crash histories were collected from the VTrans (1996 to 2000). The data showed that none of the study intersections is a High Accident Locations (HAL) (Appendix D). In order to be classified as an HAL, an intersection or road section (0.3 mile section) must meet two conditions: 1) it must have at least 5 accidents over a 5-year period; and 2) the Actual Accident rate must exceed the Critical Accident Rate. According to 1996-2000 crash data provided by VTrans, no HALs were classified within the study area. Table 6 provides a breakdown of the crash data for the study area. Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 Table 6: Recent Accident History for Intersections within the Study Area # of Accidents Cause of Accident Disregard Traffic Signs Failed to Yield Right of Way Negligence/Inattention Made Improper Turn Followed Too Closely Failure to Keep in Proper Lane Exceeded Speed Limit Other (Improper Action, Weather, etc.) Total Accidents, 1995-1999 Shelburne Shelburne and Shelburne and and Collins Allen Harbor View Dr Boulevard 14 5 2 8 3 3 Actual Accident Rate 0.328 0.132 0.128 Critical Rate 0.889 0.905 0.899 Actual/Criticai Ratio 0.368 0.146 0.143 Average Rate 0.411 0.411 0.411 page 16 The 1996-2000 data show that the Shelburne Road/Allen Road intersection had 8 reported accidents. By reviewing the police accident reports at VTrans, it was found that of the 8 total accidents occurring at this intersection, 6 were rear -end accidents and 2 were right angle broadside accidents. Half of the accidents (4) occurred between 4 PM and 7 PM and 4 accidents occurred between 1 PM and 3 PM. The Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive had 3 reported accidents according to the 1996-2000 data. Of these 3 total accidents 2 were rear -end accidents and 1 was right angle broadside accident. These accidents occurred at different times of the day. 1 accident occurred at 9 AM, 1 at 2 PM and 1 at 4 PM. Of the 3 reported accidents reported at the Shelburne Road/Collins Boulevard intersection 2 were rear -end and 1 involved a pedestrian hit accident. All 3 accidents occurred between 5 PM and 8 PM. According to information obtained from the South Burlington Police Department, accidents are infrequent on Allen Road and Harbor View Drive. High speed travel is a concern on these roads, however. The department is planning to monitor traffic speeds in this area. I 7.0 SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS This traffic analysis considered congestion at three intersections proximate to the proposed elderly housing development located on Collins Boulevard, in South Burlington. Four traffic scenarios have been analyzed: 2003 No -Build, 2003 Build, 2008 No -Build, and 2008 Build. The impact on adjacent neighborhood streets has been evaluated. It is estimated that the project will generate 61 PM peak hour trips. These estimated trips generated by the elderly housing development during the PM peak hour will not significantly increase congestion at study area intersections. Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Housing Development Traffic Impact Analysis Resource Systems Group, Inc. April 2002 page 17 Level -of -service: LOS analyses were conducted for the 2003 and 2008 No -Build and Build scenarios. Overall levels of service are acceptable for all the study area except Shelburne Road/Harbor View Drive prior to Shelburne Road reconstruction. For this intersection, the forecasted overall level of service is at F (60 sec/s). Since Harbor View Drive includes a shared left and right lane at its approach to Shelburne Road, traffic waiting to turn left on to Shelburne Road can significantly delay vehicles waiting to turn right behind them. The traffic generated by the proposed development is so small that it will not affect the LOS to a significant degree. However LOS at Shelburne/Harbor View Drive will dramatically increase with the Shelburne Road construction project because of the signalization of this intersection. ■ Safety: The accident rate analysis indicates that there are no high accident locations within the study area. Actual accident rates are well below critical accident rate for all three intersections. In addition, we recommend the following: ■ Provision of a sidewalk along the entire frontage of the proposed development extending from the southerly boundary to the westerly boundary of the development. This will keep the pedestrians separated from the road traffic. Better delineation of the roadway from the site to Shelburne Road along Collins Boulevard. Proper pavement markings, road signs might help in delineation of the road. In summary, the traffic generated by the proposed elderly housing development will not cause unreasonable traffic conditions or unsafe conditions on the surrounding road network. Shelburne Road - Allen Road Burlington, VT 03/19/02 Shelburne Road - Harbor View Drive Burlington, VT 03/19/02 PM Raw Traffic Count Data EB WB NB SB LT 0 159 0 125 TH 0 0 750 963 RT 0 88 114 0 2199 Enter 0 247 864 1088 2199 Exit 239 0 838 1122 2199 Trucki 0.0% 1 2.4%1 4.5% 1 2.5% EB WB NB SB LT 0 7 0 56 TH 0 0 832 1085 RT 0 49 13 0 2042 Enter 0 56 845 1141 2042 Exit 69 0 881 1092 2042 Trucki 0.0% 10.0% 1 4.9%1 2.5% EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Collins Boulevard LT 0 4 0 52 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 847 1137 03/19/02 RT 0 28 34 0 2102 Enter 0 32 881 1189 2102 Exit 86 0 875 1141 2102 Trucki 0.0% 10.0% 13.9% 12.7% PM Raw Traffic Count Data EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Allen Road LT 0 159 0 125 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 750 963 03/19/02 FIT 0 88 114 0 2199 Enter 0 247 864 1088 2199 Exit 239 0 838 1122 2199 Trucks 1 0.0% 1 2.4% 1 4.5% 2.5% EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Harbor View Drive LT 0 7 0 56 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 832 1085 03/19/02 FIT 0 49 13 0 2042 Enter 0 56 845 1141 2042 Exit 69 0 881 1092 2042 Trucks 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 4.9% 1 2.5% EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Collins Boulevard LT 0 4 0 52 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 847 1137 03/19/02 RT 0 28 34 0 2102 Enter 0 32 881 1189 2102 Exit 86 0 875 1141 2102 Trucks 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 3.9% 1 2.7% DHV & Annual Adjustments Annual Growth Rate for Background Traffic] 2.0% Count Year Factor to 2003 Year DHV % Annual Change 2002 1.02 1998 1679 1999 1692 0.8% 2000 1622 -4.1 % 2001 1612 -0.6% Station D002 Year DHV Corresp. Count Avg Adj 5-6pm 1998 1679 1467 1.145 1999 1692 1418 1.193 2000 1622 1310 1.238 2001 1612 1295 1.245 Average DHV Adj. 1.205 Count Year: 20021 Annual Adjustment 1.020 Total Adjustment 1.229 Station D002 Year DHV Corresp. Count Avg Adj 5-6pm 1998 1679 1467 1.145 1999 1692 1418 1.193 2000 1622 1310 1.238 2001 1612 1295 1.245 Average DHV Adj. 1.205 Count Year: 2002 Annual Adjustment 1.020 Total Adjustmentl 1.229 Station D002 Year DHV Corresp. Count Avg Ad' 5-6pm 1998 1679 1467 1.145 1999 1692 1418 1.193 2000 1622 1310 1.238 2001 1612 1295 1.245 Average DHV Adj. 1.205 Count Year: —2005-21 Annual Adjustment 1.020 Total Adjustment 1.229 PM 2003 No Build PM 2003 Build EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Allen Road LT 0 195 0 154 Shelburne Road - Allen Road LT 0 195 0 154 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 922 1184 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 922 1185 03/19/02 RT 0 108 140 0 2703 03/19/02 RT 0 108 140 0 2705 4:45 -5:45 peak Enter 0 304 1062 1337 2703 Enter 0 304 1062 1339 2705 Exit 294 0 1030 1379 2703 Exit 294 0 1030 1381 2705 EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Harbor View Drive LT 0 9 0 69 Shelburne Road - Harbor View Drive LT 0 9 0 79 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1023 1334 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1023 1335 03/19/02 RT 0 60 16 0 2510 03/19/02 RT 0 67 17 0 4:45 -5:45 peak Enter 0 69 1039 1403 2510 Enter 0 77 1040 1414 Exit 85 0 1083 1342 2510 Exit 96 0 1090 1344 EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Collins Boulevard LT 0 5 0 63 Shelburne Road - Collins Boulevard LT 0 6 0 73 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1041 1398 1 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1049 1408 1 03/19/02 RT 0 34 41 0 2581 03/19/02 RT 0 41 42 0 2619 4:45 -5:45 peak Enter 0 39 1082.2 1460.4 2581 Enter 0 46 1092 1481 2619 Exit 104 0 1074.9 1402.5 2581 Exit 115 0 1090 1414 2619 PM 2008 No Build PM 2008 Build EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Allen Road LT 0 215 0 169 Shelburne Road - Allen Road LT 0 215 0 169 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1014 1302 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1014 1304 03/19/02 RT 0 119 154 0 2974 03/19/02 RT 0 119 154 0 2975 Enter 0 334 1168 1471 2974 Enter 0 334 1168 1473 2975 Exit 323 0 1133 1517 2974 Exit 323 0 1133 1519 2975 EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Harbor View Drive LT 0 9 0 76 Shelburne Road - Harbor View Drive LT 0 10 0 86 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1125 1467 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1125 1468 03/19/02 RT 0 66 18 0 2761 03/19/02 RT 0 73 19 0 2781 Enter 0 76 1143 1543 2761 Enter 0 84 1144 1554 2781 Exit 93 0 3886 1467 2761 Exit 105 0 1198 1478 2781 EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Collins Boulevard LT 0 5 0 63 Shelburne Road - Collins Boulevard LT 0 6 0 73 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1145 1537 1 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1154 1548 03/19/02 RT 0 34 41 0 2825 03/19/02 RT 0 41 42 0 2863 Enter 0 39 1186 1600 2825 Enter 0 46 1196 1620 2863 Exit 104 0 1179 1542 2825 Exit 115 0 1194 1553 2863 PM 2003 No Build (After the Shelburne (US 7) Project Reconstruction) PM 2003 Build (After the Shelburne (US 7) Project Reconstruction) EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Allen Road LT 0 195 0 154 Shelburne Road - Allen Road LT 0 195 0 154 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 922 1184 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 924 1185 03/19/02 RT 0 108 140 0 2703 03/19/02 RT 0 108 140 0 2708 Enter 0 304 1062 1337 2703 Enter 0 304 1065 1339 2708 Exit 294 0 1030 1379 2703 Exit 294 0 1033 1381 2708 EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Harbor View Drive LT 0 13 0 132 Shelburne Road - Harbor View Drive LT 0 15 0 152 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1023 1334 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1024 1334 03/19/02 RT 0 60 16 0 2510 03/19/02 RT 0 67 17 0 2609 Enter 0 74 1039 1465 2510 Enter 0 82 1041 1486 2609 Exit 147 0 1083 1347 2510 Exit 169 0 1091 1349 2609 EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Collins Boulevard LT 0 0 0 0 Shelburne Road - Collins Boulevard LT 0 0 0 0 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1041 1398 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1048 1418 03/19/02 RT 0 34 41 0 2581 03/19/02 RT 0 41 42 0 2549 Enter 0 34 1082 1397 2581 Enter 0 41 1090 1418 2549 Exit 41 0 1074.9 1397.5 2581 Exit 42 0 1089 1418 2549 PM 2008 No Build (After the Shelburne (US 7) Project Reconstruction) PM 2008 Build (After the Shelburne (US 7) Project Reconstruction) EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Allen Road LT 0 215 0 169 Shelburne Road - Allen Road LT 0 215 0 169 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1014 1302 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1017 1304 03/19/02 RT 0 119 154 0 2974 03/19/02 RT 0 119 154 0 2978 Enter 0 334 1168 1471 2974 Enter 0 334 1171 1473 2978 Exit 323 0 1133 1517 2974 Exit 323 0 1136 1519 2978 EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Harbor View Drivf LT 0 14 0 138 Shelburne Road - Harbor View Drive LT 0 16 0 159 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1125 1467 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1126 1467 03/19/02 RT 0 66 18 0 2829 03/19/02 RT 0 73 19 0 2860 Enter 0 81 1143 1606 2829 Enter 0 89 1145 1626 2860 Exit 156 0 1191 1481 2829 Exit 178 0 1200 1483 2860 EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB Shelburne Road - Collins Boulevard LT 0 0 0 0 Shelburne Road - Collins Boulevard LT 0 0 0 0 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1145 1537 Burlington, VT TH 0 0 1152 1558 03/19/02 RT 0 34 41 0 2757 03/19/02 RT 0 41 42 0 2793 Enter 0 34 1186 1537 2757 Enter 0 41 1195 1557 2793 Exit 41 0 1179 1537 2757 Exit 42 0 1193 1558 2793 CAProjects\Bartlett\Synch ro\PreconsITMPre Rt7constNB2003. sy6 3: Allen Road & Shelburne Rd 4/4/2002 ! *- 1 P \- ! C:\Projects\Bartiett\Synchro\Preconst\PMPreRt7constNB2003.sy6 5: Harbor View Road & Shelburne Rd 4/4/2002 Mabemar*y,,r: 'IllWaR, to Confi9uraton s " r + I' + Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 e Lane Width 12 10 12 I2 12 12 Total Lost times) 4.0 4.0 40 40 4.0 40 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1,00 1.cc '1.00 130 00 Fri 1,00 085 1.00 0.85. 1.00 100 Fit Protectod 0.95 1.00 100 1.no 095 1.00 Said. Flow (prof), 1770 1478 1810 1538 1752 1845 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 Said. .Flow (Perm) 1770 1478 1810 1638'.. 171 1845 Volume (vph) ' 95 108 922 140 154 1184 Peak-hou' fil r, PNF 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 --' Ad). Flow pTl 195 108 922 140 +54 1184 Lane Group Flow (vph) 195 108: 922 140 154. 1184 _. Heavy Vehicles l%1 2% 2% 5% 5% 3% 3';, Turn Type: Pat pril pm+p1 Protected Pines- a 1 2 8 1 6 Permitted Phaseis 3 -2: - e Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 20.0 44.0 56.0 57.0 57.0 Effective Green, g (s) 13.0 22.0 46.0 690 59.0 59.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0,28 0.57 0,74 0.74 0.74 Cl_.-. Time (s) `-5.0 5.0 60: 6.0 -. 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Eztensfon (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane. Grp Cap (vph) 288 480 1041 1211 304 1361 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0,03 0.51 0.02 0.06 c0.64 W. Falb Pores 005. 007: 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.68 022 089 0,12 0.51 087 Uniform Delay, elf '31.5 22.4- 14.7 30 :' 13.8 7,7 Progression Factor t.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.0o Incremental Delay, d2 ':6:2 0.2 1to 00:. 1.3 6.2 Delays) 37.7 22.7 25.8 3.1 I&1 I3.9 Level cl Service D C C' A B 9 Approach Doay (s) 32.3 22.8 14 0 Approach LOS C C L3 'Ijl. lnrmaeastion HCM Average Control Delay 19.5 HCM Love l of :, 1N,o B _ HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (a)' '. 80.0 Sum e11-t time (s) 80 ,ariw.ixal.M;'ru Intersection Capacty Utilization 798% ICU Lovol of Sorvre o., Critical Lane Group .. ,..11, 4 M a i' HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page I RESOURW HIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartlett\Synchro\Preconst\PMPreRt7constNB2003.sy6 7: Collins Boulevard & Shelburne Rd 4/4/2002 Lane Conli0urolrons i i+ t. 4 Sign Control Stop '.. Free Free Grade 0% 01/1, 0% Volume (yell :5 34 1041 41 63 1398 Peak Hour Factor 100 1.00 I.00 1.00 ? 00 I.00 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 5. 34 1041. 41 63 t398 Pedestrians Lane Width(It);;::es :,r:r-: 6'i+iii€�, ,iekb`.ift4Jui• Walking Speed (IVe) Percenr..Biockege t" jr$,ata��§.udsj,., , zoos. sl;,ra� nu",'W +�ttr Lefd°. �iaeii«I,tiMsnn u:1�'ii l�ldei�n. 9 dVu' 'E B�wi�r�N,iaAt Right turn flare (veh) Median type """`°° Norte d Median storage vah) vC, conflicting volume 2586 1062, ,I,1<I;191'. vCt, stage 1 cool vd vC2, stage:2 conl vd a�au+ "t v.aufl la .. tC, stogie (s) 64 62 4.1 1C, 2 stage (a) r IF is) 3.5 3.3 2.2 po queue free:% 80 88 90 ')y.l"ti'I nil+v>a`�r`�lu.w1»r+.ixfl+N.w.x�t,. an.r»`„I S, W'nri' cM capacity (veh/h) 26 274 641 ' 'v1,1uF�z pfraolloTlPLaiia+#, �1'WBfi'I W&2::'NBTt�i)cS , Volume Total 5': 34;. 1082 1464 Volume Loll 5 0 0 63 Volume Right :. 0 e 34 41 O .: n�11r€dl'dS�ka�.1�+ m�1tl'aaiii1 w cSH 26 274 1700 641 Volume to Capacity 0.20 0 12 0.64 0 101'rr . l nt Queue Length (It) 15 10 0 8 Control Delay. (a) 177.1 20.0 0.0 fi 4 „ „;", i«n§a war YvnriAu§er v.Y u+1 „r u'Ia vlmut ii; w rrnJ Lane LOS F C A Approach Dstal e) . .. 40.1 0.0 64 4 6s> n;•.sa�., ':. a:'asri aw?a i. - 11 . Approach LOS E ,, Il�eraaelNii%S�'rtrma '1� 117"� k'C8�b4 , r 7°�� .L' "t', x,l � gg11)^r1rY,y fie � f„ Average Delay 4.2 Intersection :Canaci Utilizatioh ry 147.7% ICU Lewl1 of S-fce' H .tt:el 'fn44uiik HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 3 RESOURWHIT-ST51 MdV sIi Y#� §..Pies ,1 wept -'. NOT' lNe ?:a"y-mil :BT !TNI " alp1`!,!y'ol',TNi,:W No Lane Configurations Y A 4 Sign Control Stop. Free Froe Grade 0% 0% 0/ Volume (yell 9 60 1023 16 69 1334 Peak Hour Factor I.co 100 100 100 1." 1.Go Hourly flowme(vefvh) 9. 60 1023 16 69 1334 , Pedestrians Lane Width (It) Walking Speed (It/.) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (van) Mellen type None: Median storage veh). vC, oonllioting volume 2503 : 1031 1039 vCt, stage 1 cont vol Yl slag.2 oa d -I IC, single (a) S4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage' (a) IF is) 3.5 3.3 2.2 po queue Ines, % 69 79 - 90 cM capacity (vehlh) 29 286 665 Volume Total 69.1039 1403 .,. Volume Left 9 0 69 Volume Right 80 16 0 .SH 132 1700 665 Volume to Capacity 0.52'. 0.61 010 Quaus Length (it) 62 0 9 ,. Control Daley (s) _. 59.0 0.0 6.6 Lane LOS F A Approach Delay (a) 69.0 0.0 5.6 Approach LOS F Average Delay 41 Intersection Capacity Utlfzatloh w4 o% , ICULevelof Servico : R HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 2 RESOURWHIT-ST51 I C:\Projects\Bartlett\Synchro\Preconst\PMPreRt7constB2003.sy6 3: Allen Road & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 Lane Configurellons 3 r f Iv 5 } Ideal Flow (vphpi). 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 '' 1900 Lane width 12 10 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time:e) .4.0 40 4.0 40 4.0 40 •,1',k �i Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Fd 1,00. 0.85 1,00 0,85 1.00 1.00 ' Fit Protected 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow(prot) 1770 1478 1827 1653 ;1762 1845. Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1 00 1.00 0.09 100 Satd'Flow (perm) 1770 1478' -1827 1553 171 1845 Volume (vph) 195 108 922 140 154 1185 Peek -hour factor, PHF, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00: 1,00 100 Adj. Flow(vph) 195 108 922 140 154 11135 Lane Group Flow (vph) 195 108 922 140 154 1105 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2 % 2 % 1% 4^/ 3% 3-'� Turn Type ;, ;_ For- pm+ov, pm+pt Protected Phases a 1 _ 8 1 6 Permitted Phases e 2 6 Actuated Green, G (a) 12.0 20.0 44.0 56.0 57.0 570 Effective arean, g(e) 13;0 220 .'46.0 59.0 59.0 69.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0,16 0.28 0.57 074 034 0.74 Clearance Time is) 5.0 &D 6.0 5:0 5.0 6.0 ,v`y Vehicle Extension is) 3.0 3.0 30 30 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp .Cap (vph) 288 480 1051 1223 304 1361 ....u;9 v/e Ratio Prot c0,11 0.03 0.50 0,02 0.06 c0.64 v/e Ratio Perm : 005 0.07 0.32 wn!f1+'.a+at�<awx�r'yca',1 ear 1 v/c Ratio 0.68 022 0.88 0,11 0,51 087 Until- Dory, d1 31.5 22-4 14.6 3.0 13.8 7.7Progress- motor 1.00 1 00 1,00 100 1.00 1.00 Inorem total Delay, il2 &2 0.2 10.3 0.0 ' 1.3 6.4 Delay a) 37.7 22.7 24.9 3.1 15. 1 14 1 Level f S 'ce D C C A 8 B ,,ia5i+c't`ai «;axlse!.e•*�, rt Approach Delay (s) 32-3 22.0 14.2 Apprca.h LOS C C 13 a hilishia nSummary , ., .., "' *"� 5, "-.-'s', •" HCMfAvarage Control Delay 19.3 HCM Level f S.".. 3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0 84 Aoluated Cycle Length (a) 80.0 Sum of tosl'lime (a) so Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.8% ICU Level 01 Service It Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page I RESOURWHIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartlett\Synchro\Preconst\PMPreRt7constB2003. sy6 7: Collins Boulevard & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 ,r- 'I- t Movement NBE:IN�#i:sNki ftNeE "88L;a9,.,; Lanc Con!igun:�ionc 1 t. 4 Sign Control Stop , '.Free Frae Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (vofvh) 6 41 1049 42 ' 73 1409 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow reis (voNh) Y 6. 41 1049 42 73 140e "L 4ppryryk'+pez,�p' s P 0pW4"iN1N u.14f1r1fiEl rfraaw.w Pedestrians Lane Width(8) Walking Speed (it/,) Percent-Bbakage _. Right turn flare IvehI Mediantype None Median storage, veh) vC, conflicting volume 2024". 1070 1091 vC1, stage I cool vol vG2, stage 2 wet vol IC, single a) 6.4 6.2 4.1 IC, 2etage:(a) '. ,,,141;atiw.,.w(�uixrl+u�wuurusa..w w+ll,,eM,lmi4w,rw""I 1F (a) 3.5 3.3 PO queue free% 76 85 _ 89 fi)T4 - cM capacity (velVh) 24 271 636 OrrW n, Uh-*- s WB ty' W8:VNar ti SB 1 ,vim Volume Total 6. 41 1091 1481 Volume Left 6 0 0 73 Volume Right 0 41 ':42 0 i,1yF, a;G °S�,du,+z i)I.usv"ib.xy.d iw� i€i.1„uJw)m ' .i>r1i�Y 'I' cSH 24 271 1700 636 Volume. to Capacity 0,25 0.15 0.64 01f�; .i#M4vn ' tz Et > •` .taueaxss'abs#d�u 4irF eL Queue Length (I1) 19 13 0 10 Control Delay,(®) 201,9 206 0.0 rtcf 7.8..,udf 4li'u�4 � a45 H � jy,x� i,dw l in, l e4:411ek i rd ..ws ri� �w lr... 5t Lane LOS F C A Approach Delay (s) _ 43_a 0.0 78 1: 211", ;'µ.Fro Approach LOS E liitereeotlon Sum m0 Average Delay 5.2 Interoaotbn Capacity Utilization. 149.2% " .ICU Level .1,Service H HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 3 RESOUR W HIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartlett\Synchro\Preconst\PMPreRt7constB2003.sy6 5: Harbor View Road & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 1- 1 r Lane Configurations Y P 4 Sign Control -: Slop Free ; Grade 01% 6% o Volume(-Wh) 9 67 1023 17 79 1335 Peak Hour Factor 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (-f, h) Pe,deatnane 9 67 1023 17 79 1335 Lane Width (il). ,.,La,=.wM EMU s5o a41,M111, Walking Speed it/a) Percent Bbckage. " erffA s}a€tgw+wtrnar V x `�.sl,tirv.u::'+u� wr:s Right turn It- (van) Median type Noon Median storage veh) vC, conllbtingvolume 2524 1032 vCt, stage i coof vol vC2.; stage pool vol ,..,). LiIVaA as n1,1,,4iWii:.n-r1;. Q, single (a) 6.4 6.2 4.1 1C;:2 stage (a) .. IF (e) 3S 3.3 2.2 p0 queue tree % 67 '..77 e3 ° ,[ „a; k„rem x.. eesj rzu'bsET cm capacity (vetVh) 27 285 665 Direol(on,CariBd rfi . `W8)'t�`w%F SIM? W�'$13 I Volume Total 76 - 1040> 1414 Volurnn colt 9 0 79 Vclumo Right 67 '17 0 "F`•r'".a.®, -.i,. '.a 135 1700 665 Volume to Capacity 0.56 0.61 0,12 49w Ououe Length (ft) 70 0 10 Control Delay (a) 616 "00 SA Lane LOS A Approach DO'"1,) 61.6 0'a 6.4 Approach LOS trli`eiaea4brr6rFmmary ,x... .,*+' � �;: Average Delay Intersection Ce[-xy Ufl-t , 144.1 "% ICU Levin c1 3-or, I I np HCM Unaignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 2 RESOURWHITST51 CAProjects\Bart[ ett\Synchro\Preconst\PM Pre Rt7constN62008. sy6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/4/2002 < < t r 1 CAP rojects\Bartlett\Synchro\P reconst\PM PreRt7constNB2008.sy6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/4/2002 Lane Configurations `1 r~ ? r 1 t Ideal Flow 1900 1900 1900.', 1900, 1900 1900,-_,v Lane Width 12 10 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (a) 4.0 40 -4.0 40 4.0'.. 40_- Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Fit -- 1.00 0.85 1.00 0 85 1.00 1 00 Fit Protected 0.95 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot)g, MI) .,1478 1810 1538 1752. 1845 Flt Permitted 0.95 i `0 1.00 1.00 008 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 1111 (I 1478 1810;"', 1538'. 148. 1845 Volume(Vph) 215 119 1014 154 169 1302 Peak -hour factor,:P,HF 1.00 '1.00 61.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adi. Flow (vph) 215 119 1014 154 169 1302 Lane. Group Flow (vph)" 215 119. 1014 154 169 1302 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 5% 5% 3% 3% Turn Type pm+ov pmaov pmfpl d, Protected Phases 8 1 2 8 t 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 Mo 44.0 56.0 57.0 57 0 Effective Green, g (a) tag 226.. 46.0 59.0 59.0- - Actuated I Ratio 0.16 0.2B 0.57 0.74 0.74 0.74 Clearance Time (.) 5.0 . 5.0 - . 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Extensions 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph):: 288 480 ;t 041: 1211 290 1361 v/ Ratio Prot c0. 12 0,03 0,56 0,02 0.07 c071 v/s Re to Perm 005 008 ' 037 . v/c Ratio 0,75 0.25 0.97 0.13 0.58 0,96 Uniform Delay, d 1 31.9 226 16A 3.0 18.9 9 4 Progression Factor 1.00 1 OD 1,00 1,00 1.00 100 Incremental Delay, d2 10A 03 .22.3 0.0. 3:0 151 Delay is) 42.0 22.8 38.7 .1.1 21.8 24.5 L-ei or Service D: i:C. 0 A C C Approach Delay(s) 35.2 340 242 Approeoh LOS 0 C C - .. rionsection Summary HCM Avurago Control Delay 29.3 HCM L.v.l .I Sery co HCM Volume to Capacily ratio 0,92 Actuated Cycle Length (a) °' 80.0 Sum of lost time'(s) 80 o.r +,uVM wxnuaG'.ui e In'orsacllon Capacity Utilization 87.1 % ICU Level of Sarvic. U c Critical Len. Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 1 RESOUR W HIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Baniett\Synchro\Preconst\PMPreRt7constNB200B.sy6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/4/2002 I- 1 I Mo1al'rftlkrit419.,s!!(.>' 1oi:"WOWKWOWN Lane Configurations i r A 4 Sign Control _ Stop Free. Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (v.)Vh) 5 34 1,145 41 63 1537 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 Hourly glow rate (VaNh) 5 34 11451. 41 63, 1537 Pedealriane lahe Width' (it) Walking Speed (It/,) Peroag Hlook fje Right turn dare (veh) Median type Median stomp. Von) VC conflicting velum. 2828:: 1166 -.. 1188 NMI r�ir"',u f 1 !4 f�l'i'p9 I1 i N�'ph tl PAN vC1, stage I conf Vol VC2 slags 2'conf Vol yy q ,.h3.,,x:;,. IC, at 1. (a) Brit 6.2 4.1 ID:2.et-us (a) qt��+,•, IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0quoue lrea%;'. 72 86 89. -1mW.j,,ji.l; Ikl .Mcapa.ity(v.Nh) 18 239 585 Olfaction, Lane 0 ' WS 1 W B 2 NB 1 Sri I Volume Total 5 34 1186 1600 Volume Loft 5 0 0 63 Volume Right ;. 0 34 41:. 0 ,.ulduaSnGitikl�lMJ cSH IS 239 1700 585 Volume to Capacity :. 0.28 0.14 0.70. 0AI Oueue Length (It) 20 12 0 9 Control Daley (e) 275,8 228 0.0 13.3 Lane LOS F C B Approach Delay(s) 55.0 0,0. 133 ;`,s'y., ""p1 ` t)'.o ',ti im-. z eaa0.:wi4a&'. ra 1.. .. . Approach LOS F Iitiereaolkini9ufh"mervl'"`� �"..+9 i!i�atsl€%?"r�,«YRC�pt!%!rK,its'�",Riau'�'^JYe"�E!t'�)?=�a9'�$9"I.'�� Average Delay 8.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization.'. 115015 % ICU kuwal of S-lor, ;; "'H ,a HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 3 RESOURWHIT-ST51 tVEA1F01($FT'x4 )FCC="'S ,f Lane Configurations Y A 4 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Vulume(v.Nh) 9':' 66 1125 :18 76 1467 Peak Hour Factor 100 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1.00 Hourly lbw rate (volVh) 9 56 1125 ' , 18 76 1467 Pedestrians Lane Width (It) Walking Speed (III percentBlaokaga [ 110u=9wrZ,;� Right turn fare (van) Median type None Median slo.ga van) VC, conflicting Volume 2753 11 m7£+�afa VC1, stage 1 conf Vol VC2, stage 2 cord Vol -�,... IC, single (a) 64 6.2 .I 41 1C, 2:alags (a)' -� 1F (e) 35 3.3 22 PO queue Iree % - 54' 73 87 cM capacity (veh1h) 19 249 608 OirbtllGS k-5�at1a#ItPwlq;w^1xvW8)1`a,R""Awi'1,�B.i�(t Volume Total 75 1143 1643 Volume Left 9 0 76 Volume Right 66 18 0 c5H 103 1700 608 Volume to CapaoHy 073.'.0.67 0.13 Oueue Len91h (11) 96 0 11 Control Delay (s). Lan. LOS 102.5 F 0.0 108 B Approach Daley(s) 1025 0.0 1c)8 Approach LCS risirnziry Average Coley :] 8 Inlereeation Capapky Uillizafion 156. T% ICU L-I of S."- : 1{ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 2 RESOUR W HIT-ST51 I Q\Projects\Bartlett\Synchro\Preconst\PMPreRl7constB2008.sy6 3: Allen Road & Shelburne Road 414/2002 ! t i &UVafiehl y ^nftBL.-""h4 ',OeTi` NSR S Lane Configurations 1 r t r 1 t Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 10 12 12 12 12 Total Loa[ time (a) 4.0 40 4.0 40 4.0 40 Lane Lill, Faclor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 Fn 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.65 1.00 100. Fk Prolecleu 0.95 1 . 1.00 ' 00 0.91 1 00 Said. Flo(pr..t) 1770 1478 '1810 1538 1752 1845. "P it d I 0.95 1 W 1.00 1 00 0OB 1.00 .ttl Flo (p 1770 1476 1810 1638 148 1845' ' Volume ivph) 215 '. ; 9 1014 154 169 1304 Peak -hour fact.,, PHF 1,00 1on 1.00 100 1,:00 1.00 tnnxeayWwu; Atll Flow (vph) 215 119 1074 154 169 1304 Lane Group Flow (vph) 215 119 t 014 154 "i 69 1304 H a V hcles %) 2% 2% 5% 5% 3% 3,. Turn Type I pm.ov pm- pmrpl 45, Prot i d Phases 8 1 2 8 1 6 Perm4led Phases 8 2 6 Acluated Green, G Ia) 12D 20.0 44.0 56,0 57.0 57.0 ElleotI- Green, 0 (s) 1.3;0 22.0 46.0 59.0 59.0 -. 59.o Aclualed g/C Ratio 0.16 0.211 0.,17 0.74 0.74 1174 Clearance Time(sj 5.0 6.0 6.0 50 5.0 6.0 VehicleExtension (s) I 3.0 30 30 30 3.0 Lane Grp: Cap.(vph) t268 _3.0 480.:1041 1211 290 136t via Rollo Prot c0. 12 003 0,56 002 0.07 ,0,71 via Re Jo Penn 0.05 0.06 0.37 .>r: We Ratio 0.75 025 0,97 013 0.58 0 96 Uniform Delay, dl 31.9 228 16.4 3.0 1189 94'-, Progression Factor 1.00 100 1,00 100 1.00 1 00 Incremental Dairy, d2 10.1 03 22.3 00 30 153 Delay(.) 42.0 228 38.7 31 218 247 Level of.8ervlce D C �. D A ''C C Approach Delay (a) 35.2 340 244 Approach LOS D C C �lit�lee`Balk+hr8b(ntnaeyM^"F7Fv`'fl�r1"Ir'''�l&1 "t�1 IR�'v`P'�°' JtiS°34C,€�'''�''(ti�3 `aLtio-:�P HCM Average Control Delay: 29.4 HCM .Lowell of Servbe C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (a) 80.0 surd of lost time (e) 8 0 ' Intersection Cap -city Ulil zation 87 2% ICU Level of Service D o Crllieaf Lena Group ;rve�D'�w�i" ts'n HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 1 RESOUR W HIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartiett\Synchro\Preconst\PMPreRt7constB2008.sy6 7: Collins Boulevard & Shelburne Road M412002 ! '1- r 1 I�fdVemiat I,S'"i ; '1^. 1N�ltiti�'.'.°NNE"=`I. Lane Configurations `I t t. a Sign Control Slop ,. Free Free _'. nwk<��iv�ia„'yzyv - , Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(vah/h) "6 41 1154 42 '73 1546 Peak Hour Factor I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 Hourly flow mle(veh/h) 6 41.'._ 1164 42 73 Pedestrians Lane W idlh (It): `�,11n1>'t a,1�ItY,'IW+'6'Pr,wtar;¢ «j:t��tjy, "��knari.,„1r'„�),1w:s'':'If� Walking Speed (IUs) PeroenLBbokage Right turn flare (van) Median type "" None Medan storage vehj vC, conNioting volume 2860 1176 vCt, stage 1 conl vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol .» '„.:, C. �;..a �r" r,d n✓ae'1e 5� in. .%Y Mr . � a j1.si.uas IC, single (a) 6 4 6.2 4A [c, 2 stage (,) ... ,. .. IF (a) 3.5 3.3 2.2 PO queueiroe % 63 83... cM capacity (veNh) 16 236 580 [1tCeoN6tc(Lreiii`�ug�,"!"�.WB'`9 � WB,2:+'NB.i4F5r,.'96 Volume Total 6 41 1196 1621 Volume Left 6 0 0 73 Volume RigM.:... :: a 41 :..42 0 wa ru'� al'v'MIMIm�#rMMAMiAM,PIAt+�:� =1.1121 V9 cSH 16 236 1700 580 Volume to Capacity 0.37 0.17 - 0.70 0.13 Oueue Length (fl) 25 15 0 I 1 Control Delay-.(4) 322.4 23.5:. 0.0 16.8 1+ Lane LOS F C C Approach Daley (a) 61.6 0.0 16.8 Approach LOS F ,.. IlileY9Yt� 'rii$li" ma 6 ",w 'I,�v L Lkrli Ypti.t =waWou (mxfi �a�C"?i?11 :,�1n p,)y aw r\V.( a"""iR,a ' qy?'r..., Average Delay 10.5 Inlaraeolbn Cepac4y Utlll2ellon , 162.1 % ICU Level of Sarvme . H HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 3 RESOUR W HIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartiett\Synchro\Preconst\PMPreRt7constB2008.sy6 5: Harbor View Road & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 Moi+ayienY V,fBL' "uv Il N8T NeR ' S8L=' SBT' Lane C nt ons Y F 4 Sign Co lop Fr.. F Grace 0-n o Volume i-i h) 'J 73 112, 19 86 1468 Yit7sndk ba+[r > ,� y; m Peak H=.ic1o, 1 00 t 00 1.00 1.00 :.CO 1 00 Hourly liow ntD wotvhl 10 '. 73 1125 19 36''14(38 Pedest Lane Width (It) .. suwam ypn", >qM w sMia Walking Sp i (It/ ) Peroenl Black J a""`" -2°t aulav7n c ra i sev m5zs^p rqE»`*,r.F ..."""`"F,c 3w�.emrEa�m°.h..�i,carwmtn. uaoisa axssm�rtara.ra+d Right turn floc +xnl Median NPp. Nono Ss 'savata-ka+r rx 1 1.�,. xw.nt:ss r,y .1 ;;t€ 4vm and xrvrw ww »_ mw>;4.»pM..rwro,ecr a &nwSUrb tro-w samme„ie Median starago vent .. vC, conflicting 1- 2774 1134 1144 1'ri'Y Hss'<vV21s uxkrA'. Y�aMMg9 *€»'r*'�'U} rct� :law sfitt vCl, 91 ge 1 vcl vC2, stage 2 co I.v01 `" "p:4 r K"' €". »° r »+..w s) tC, single (.,(Is) 6.4 n 2 ,4. 4 1 lc,-2 sta9e (s) :»ssn<a.�e-ri:.s .,e:%=1"W IF (a) 3.5 3.:1 pl) queue free % 46 71 a6 pp cM capacity (,.I vh) 18 249 all Volume Total 83 '1.144 4554 Volume Left 10 0 86 Volume Right 73 19 0 ER� cSH 99 1700 607 Volume 1. (.,pacify 0.84 067 0 14 A +6 . aw✓, >ku o-4:5 V 1Y d Mj ;. �.b� lrtvYkt . WO Yk'� Oueue L h 1I 116 0 7 Control Delay lsl 27 0 a 123 °`a'1""�'€e`sk ua s » sari k w l Lane Los F 13 Approach Delay (a),', _ 127 1 00 123 •kv°e ,,,;�7,-a#•,v4Mtaulas;^, a Approach LOS a F Averag Delay 10.7 Intersection Capacity, utilimf i}r'4"' WiVW, HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report 6a..line Page RESOURWHIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartlett\Synchro\Postconst\PM P ostRt7const N62003. sy6 3: Allen Road & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 ! t �I'dvlemeM t"�r'��k:*.T �Ss4 /• 8 "fd W6H'"h N6�+i ' NBfi,'x"� t . 98Tk , r'";'rn'�`i 't ,�1`i9.. �".,, Lane Configumlions F r }A 1 }? Ideal Flow (vphpl):.. 1900--'. 19W 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 io 12 12 10 12 Total Lost time.(s) 4.0: 40 '4.0 4.0 40 ,sEw ,,,,ru,la kglN.,raassra.+ Lane Ut I Factor 1,00 1,00 0.95 1 00 095 Fd 1.00 0.85 ,0.98 1,00 1.00. _ Fill Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 100 Said Flow(prot) 1770: 1478 '3370 1636 3505 Fit Permitted 0.95 '0 1.00 0.16 1.00 Satd. Flow (p.mi) 11. 14711 3370 268 3505 Volume (vph) 195 108 922 140 154 1184 Peak -hour factor, PHF - 1 00:: 1 00 '.1.00 1.00 1.00 1 W ;a9wfnu322; Adj. Flaw (vph) 195 108 922 140 154 t 184 Wne Group Flow (vph) 196 108 1062 0 154 1184 „ Heavy Vehicles (%1 2% 2% 5% 5% 3% 3% Turn Type r.`pm+ov ;.pm+pt ... . .,,.. Protected Phase. 8 1 2 1 6 Permeled Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (a) 13.4 20.8 32.2 45.6 45.6 Effective Green, :g(a) 14.4 238 34,2 - 47.6 476 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0,34 0,49 0,68 0.68 Clearance Time (a) 5.0 80 6.0 - 6.0 60' Vehicle Exlaneion (a) 30 30 3.0 30 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 364. 587 1646. 366 2383.. via Ratio Prot co, 11 0,02 .0.32 0,06 c0.34 v/a Ratio Penn. : 0.05 0.23 v/c Ratio 054 0.18 065 0.42 0,50 Uniform Delay, dl 248 15.3 13.4 6.7- 5.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,66 1.62 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.2 2.0 0.7' 0.1 Delay (a) 26.3 16.4 15 3 11.9 3 9 Level of. Servic. (C S B B A Approach Delay Is1 218 15 3 9.3 Approach LOS '. C e A '- InteramofianSdmmery HCM Average Control Delay 13.2 HCM Love1 of S.ry ce B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Actuated Cycle Length (.1 170.0 Sum of lost time (s) ' 120 Intersection Capacity Ulilizalion 59.3 % ICU Level of Service > c Critical.Wn. Group ';snv HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page I RESOURWHIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartlett\Synch ro\Postcons AP M P os t Rt7constNB2003. sy6 7: Collins Boulevard & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR :SBL SST Wne Conligura0ons ^ 'F 11 Sign Control Step i=r.., Fros Grade 0% O,o Volume (vordh) 0 34 10.11 41 0 I398 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 I. W I.00 100 t.00 100 Hourly flow rate (vetvh) 0 34 1041 41 0 1398 Facts t-rat Wne Width (0) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (vehl Median type. None, Median storage veh) vC conflicting volume 1760:', 541 ;1082 vC1, stage t cont vol vC2, stag-2 conf volu"' $i a eaSl tC, single (.) 6.8 6.9 4.2 i0:2 stage(.) u F (a) 3.5 3.3 2.2 po Queue free% .. 100 93 100„1 r 1 cM capacity (veh/h) 77 491 635 V. ume.Total 34 694 38B 699 699 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right r : 34,: 0 41'. 0 S 0 „',a'°`1 • .I�S�„,t� .SH 491 1700 1700 1700 t700 Volume to Capacity:. 0.07 0.41 0.23 0,41 0.41 Queue Length (It) 6 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (a) 12.9 00 0.0 Do :...0.0, Wne LOS B ,11.`. Approach Delay:(a)_ 12.9 ' .00 0.0' .. .. Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.0% IOU level of Setvks - A HCM U-ignalize i Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 3 RESOURWHIT-ST5t C:\Projects\Barttett\Synchro\Postconst\PMPostRt7constNB2003.sy6 5: Harbor View Road & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 Lane Configurations Y fl. 5 1f Ideal Flow (vphpl). 19oo I900; 1900. 1900 19003'1900, Lane Width 16 16 12 12 10 12 Total Lost time (a) ' , 4.0 4.0 4.0 d 4.0 Lan. UIII. Factor 1.00 0 95 1.00 0.95 Firt 0.89 1.00 1:00' 1.00 Fit Protected 0.99 1,00 0.95 1.00 Said, Flow (prol) > 1898 3430 1636. 3505 _ Fit Permitted 0.99 1.00 0,22 1.00 Said. Flow(perm) '11898 3430 372 3506 ' ` -,� ? °! - •> M! Votume (vph) 13 60 1023 16 132 1334 Peskrhour factor, PHI: 100' 1,00 1.00_1.00 100 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 13 60 1023 16 132 t334 Lam Gmup Flow vph) 73 _0 1039 : 0 132 1334- Heavy Vehicles %) 0% 0% 5% 5% 3% 3% Turn Type Protected Phases 8 2 p-pt :,... 1 6 ire MiW;, 4.r.�inncnaY.a .t l,wtm +x�: Gawt4 Permitted Phaees 8 2 e- xuli:€:rw4..a.0 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.3 43.4 54.7 547 Effective Green,. gs(a). 5,3 45A 587:.: 667 ncrrw�.:.n yar„ eowrc ansa,o-.�,„ra„xuM1. Actuated yC Ratio 0.08 0.65 081 0.81 Clearance Time (a) 5.0 6.0 6.0 ' 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 Lane : Grp Cap (vph) 144 2226 433 2839 "r v/s Ratio Prot 1,0.04 0.30 0.03 c0.38 Rallo Perm 022. v/c Retie 0.57 0.47 0.30 0.47 Uniform Delay, dt: 31.1 62 - 2.5 2.0 (( Progression Factor 1.00 1,17 1,00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.8 0.6 0,4 0,6 Delay (a) 33.9 7.9 2.9 2 6 Leval of Service C A A A-` Approach Delay (a) 33.9 7.9 26 Approach LOS: :. C A' A flsiere®eltdr�3uinTniary" ig.�` .:. HCM Averege Control Delay 5.6 FICM L...1 01 S.rvico A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47 Actuated Cycle Length (a); 70.0 Sum of lost time () , .x.... so Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.5 % ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group ,,,� 1 u " ". , ....,• ',v ")e HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 2 RESOURWHIT-ST51 CAP rojects\Bar(lSUNS ynch ro\Postconst\PMPostRt7const62003. sy6 3: Allen Road & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 r I,- t WBC.-i'rl ,. "N8R 621 SST Lana co rg„rarlo� r rt tt Ideal Flow,(vpho) 1900 1900' 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 10 12 2 I C 12 Total Lost limo {c 4.0 4.0 4o 4.0 4 0 . ,t�:dxu.'rue ua a Lane Util. Factor 1.00 I.00 C.95 I.00 0.95 Frt -1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.04,,,,v _ Fit Protected -0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Fbw (prof) 1770 1478 3489': `1662 3539 Fk Perm filled 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 Seltl Ffew(psimal 1770". 1470 3489 269 3639 Volume (vph) 195 108 924 140 154 1185 Peek -hour factor, PHF -1.00 100 1,00 loo 1.00 _ 106 an;) ,,.y...e,,, Add Flow(vph) -195 1a8 924 140 154 1195 Lone Group Fb.ivpfi) 195 t08' 1064 0. 154 1185 Turn Type pm-v I-P, Protected Phases 8 1 2. 1 6 Perm lied Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (a) fpf;4 20.9 32:1 45.6 45.6 Effective Green, g is) 14 4 23.9 34.1 47.6 47.6 Actuated'g/C Ratio 0.21 0.34 0,49 0.68 0-6e, Clearance Time is) 5.0 6.0 so 6.0 60 Yehicle>Extension (a) 3,0 30 3.0': 3o 30 r' Lane Grp Cap (vph) 364 589 1690 371 2407 v/e Ratio Prol. c0.11 0A2 c0.31 0,06 c033 v/s Retlo Perm 0.05 0.23 We Ratio 0.54 0.18 0.63 0,42 049 "Fj AMAte Uniform Delay, dt 24 e 162 13.3 6.8 5.4 Progression Factor. 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.74 1 66 ,a!'n „4 �pruy e" ewuk9 Increm Intel Delay, d2 1.5 0.2 I.B 0.7 0.1 Delay (a) 26.3 16.3 15.1 12.4 9.1 Level of Service C B U B A Approach Delay (a) 22.8 ' 16.1 96 Approach LOS C B A tnt'.Yaeaikin=6uin'mary .. 1i;5.+..,k'rk,7;'la'�i'r�'9°a3�'u.�„y�.'.�kf 'aQ'MW' At, ,.iD,'?N„$. HCM Average Control Delay 13.2 HCM Level of Sanace 8 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 ,..':{tii' dermiwedad Cycle Length pi) 70.0 Sum of lost time (a) 12.0 AcWated Merseclbn Capacity Utilization 59.3 % ICU Level of Servce A c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page I RESOUR W HIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartlett\Synchro\Postconst\PM PostRt7constB2003, sy6 7: Collins Boulevard & Shelburne Road 4/412002 r t Lane Configurations r to }? Sign Control stop' - Free , arAUVAWAMM Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (ve1Vh) ; 0:'. 41 1048= 42 ' 0 1418: u1�f ��'�e �ti"�rllk,YwnlYSReurnY� F"nNu.Yr 1: i1� Peak Hour Factor 1,00 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1.00 Hourly flow rate,(veh/h) 0,. 4t IN -,1'l'.,42 ww ,r. 1'T)'ury 4�h{t4aen,.,ja w.„�ab rlre•,:F'%'r .,. ... Pelealds- Lane Width (It):,: tl i ;", „yv" 1>vhr W+^^ srr1 am'11ik Walking Speed (IVs) Pacoent Blockage ik�XNnaMIM �fij1}'"MT ' r t4i'r rt y r 1 Right turn flare (van) Median type None,. Median storage veh) vC, con o ifllctlhg volume 1778 545'Cl. stage 1 cant vol vC2, siaga2 conf vol . %.,I,a ti 'v.'a+,4ri . /ukliiif a a i i Vi4tn;ii,davi .'lii fiwl �w tC, single Is) 6.8 6A 4.1 IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 PO queue ire. % 100 92 . 0d 1* w ,. = ° ..C,"s^!"?�1iux� MX cM capacity (veh/h) 74 482 636 f�l@sullen fang r•1`W69"oNB i'a^'NB'2 69B1 ' Se Volume Total:. 41. 699. 391 709 709 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 41 - 0 42 _ 0 0:,1"'1 <. - W-:; oSH 4a2 1700 1700 1700 1700 Voumo to Capacity 0.08 0.41 023' 042 0.42!,y,"„f.,,,a,iwvwfke�6ix"i,IMt.ksreAiala2:s Ouaue Lun Oth I!11 7 0 0 0 0 ContrPl Dol (o) Y 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA Lane LOS 8 Approach Delay (s) 13.2 0.0 0 0 Approach LOS a Aiiiabofbh S lmmary 3 Average Delay 0 2 lhlerseatlomCap-ty Utllaation 425'% n� ICU Level of Sorvico A ,�'M=1 T HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 3 RESOUR W HIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartlett\Synchro\Postconsl\PMPostRt7constB2OD3.sy6 5: Harbor View Road & Shelburne Road 414/2002 *,- t r '- 1 Lane configurations Y tP 1 1t Ideal Flow (vphpl) ` 1900 1900 1900 '.1:900 1900 1900 Lane Width 16 16 12 12 10 12 Total Last time ',` �' ao 4.0 4.0 40 Lane Util. Factor too 0.95 1.00 0.95 Fri 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.99 1.00 _ 0.95 1.00 Said, Flow(prol)' 1861 =. 3531 1652' 3539 Fit Permitted 0.99 _ 1.00 0.21 1.00 Said 'Flow (perm) 1861 '. 3531 a57 3539 Volume (vph) 15 67 1024 17 152 1334 Peek -hour lector, PHF 1.00.. 1.00 -1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00,_ -tea Adj. Flow (vph) 15 67 1024 17 :52 1334 Lane Group Flow Nph) : 82" 0 ' 1041 0 152 1334 Turn Type pm"" Protected Phaeea 8 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 2 ,. 6 Aolueled. Green, G (a) 5.5 40.9 53.5 535 ElfeclNe Green, g (s) 6.5 42.9 55.5 55.5 Actuated g/C Ratio '0.09 0.61 : 079 :'0.79 Clearance Time is) 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension is)..' 3.0- 3.0 30 530 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 173 2164 442 2806 v/e Ratio Prof - c0.04 0,29 OD4 c0.36 , v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 We Ratio 047 OAS 034 048 Uniform Delay, dl 30 ' 7 4 3 1 2 4 - Progreealon Factor 100 117 1.00 1.00 , ncremenlal Daley, d2 2.0 0.6 0.5 0.6 Delay (e) 32.2 9.3 3.6 3.0 , Level c1 Service C A A A Approach Delay (a) 32.2 9.3 - '. 3.1 Approach LOS C A A tlxkYlrrSilfall'3'fi�i'Irtiet�: ",T+&."1�1"st?�c;�"�u,'�"N�°���'re�?fi° rs'a8ik�s";?1'�di;8i ,i� HCM Average Coalrot Delay 6.5 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0,48 Actuated Cycle Length (a) 70.0 Sum of lost time (a) 8.0 IMereectlon Capacity Utilization ` 52.2 % ICU Leval .1Bervlce A c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synch. 5 Report Baseline Page 2 RESOUR W HIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartlett\Synchro\Postconst\PMPostRt7constNB2008.sy6 3: Allen Road & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 l I- 1 I 1 M6iidinif`.7"'"�' 9ti1106R' `5�.." SBT Lane Configurations 1 Y }t. 1 ft Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900" 1900 1:900. 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 10 12 v 12 10 '2 Total Lost. time (s) :4.0 40..4.0 40. 4.0: , Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0,95 1,00 0.95 Fit 1.00 0:85.... 0.98 1,00 1.00'.:' Fit Protected a95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.00 Sold. Flow (prctj ., „ 1770 1478:'. 3469 i1652 3539. Fit Permitted 0.95 1.10 1,00 0.12 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) `':'1770 1478: 3469- 210 3539 Volume (vph) 215 119 1014 154 169 1302 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1'..00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 100:. .. a Adj. Flow (vph) 215 119 1014 154 169 1302 Lane Group Ftdv4, h) 215 119 1188 0 169 1,902 Turn Type pm+ov pm+o1 Protected Phases:`. a 1: 2. 1 ,@ Permitted Phases 9 Actuated Qrs., G (a) 13.8 21.4 31.5 45.2 45.2 Effective Green, g a) 14.8 24.4 33.6 47.2 47.2 Actuated -g/CRatio 021 035 0.48 Oi67. 0.67 Clearance Time a) 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 60 Vehlcle Extension (e) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 374 600 1665 339 2386 We Ratio Prot.' c0.12 ' 0:03 c0.34 0:07 .0.37 We Ratio Perm 0,05 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.20 0.70 0.50 0,55 Uniform De(ay, d1 24.a 160 14.3 8.4 5.9 Progression Factor : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.34. 1.71 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.2 2.5 1.0 02 Delay 1.) 26.9 16.1. 16.8 '2 2 10.3 Level of Service C B B Approach Delay (a) 23A '`16.8 10.5' ,. Approach LOS C 8 B tn([art ^:t?.,v'",`k'3'.� HCM Average Control Delay 14.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 _ Actuated Cycle Length is) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Interaeation Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU:Level of Service _ B o Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 1 RESOURWHIT-ST51 CAP rojects\Bartlett\Synch ro\Pos tconst\P M Pos tRt7const N62008. sy6 7: Collins Boulevard & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 MoaMlibP Tr"F4;((Ili!No i*tK'"OKN,'M ° NOR, ,.C& " >#Tri Lane Configurations t }p N Sign Control:. , , Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h).' 0 34'1145 41 0 1537 Peek Hour Factor 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 Hourly flow rate (V.lVh) 0 34 1145 41 0 1537 Pedeelhans .., Len. Width (it)d;•.e,1 '. Walking Speed (It/e) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (voh) Median type Nona]uwKT,' Median storage v.h) vC, conllloting Volume 1934 5937y;s.�P', MrA;„, 1188 vC1, stage I conl vol vC2, stage 2 conf Vol vifn✓w a@ aryl .r,r a 'M1'^tnmF »4s a .1,^U1 9 aurp'r 4 ', „1 � IC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 to. 2stage .(a). IF (t) 3.5 3.3 22 p0 queue free% 100 92 100 cM capacily (voh/h) 58 •149 585 otrelbn; Le'niilp.. r� �^"^WSY1 Ne.'1 ,NBig='BBs1 ',sB2 ,"1' ":�'l Volume Total 34 763 423 768 768 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 34 0 41 0 ', 0 s:�" ,?'1q Pii�6�Mpi)i'Inyvui�'s+�Sl�r�� a a�Tti�.wk��;:'410�1 .SH 449 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to: Capacity 0.06 0,45 0.25 0.45 0,45 Queue Length (it) 6 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (a) 13.7 00 0.0. 0.0. 00 "yx1�;i�„1e .n 1. 1ktiuA ,Piq .,�:4�1 a371 i/t Lane LOS B Approach Ctifey,(a), 13-7 ,0.0„.>.. ,0.0 . - . ••,;4r- ,. vas.uae ,.1:.. . mn..,.: a Approach LOS 8 t' t.LaOot(oh19'U'RImaF " NMI lyc'`1 ,+1�rc +{t M1 O t I" Average Delay 0.2 Interaeclicn Capacity: Utilization 45.8% ICU level of Servksi+, °,„. a/,ilnrainb ,n HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synch. 5 Report Baseline Page 3 RESOUR W HIT-ST51 C:\Projects\Bartlett\Synchro\Postconst\PMPostRt7constNB20G8.sy6 5: Harbor View Road & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 I 1 Lane Configurations M }t• rl tt IdeaPFlow(vphpl) 1900. 1900' 1900 1900 1900 ':'1900 Lame Width 16 '.6 12 12 10 2 Total -Lost time 4,0.. 4.0 4_0 40 Z. Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1 00 0.95 Fri 0.89 1.00 100 1 00 '" U Fit Protected 0 99 1.00 0 95 1 00 Said. Flow(prat) _ Iwo 3531 1F 2 3539 Fit Permitted 0.99 1.00 0 18 1 00 Said. Flow:(perm) 1860 3531 315 ' 3539 Volume (,ph) 14 66 1125 'i8 138 1467 Peak -hour factor, PHF 100 1.00 1.00 100 100 100 Adj, Flow (vph) 14 66 t 125 18 138 1467 Lane Group Flow (vphl 90 0 1143 0 138 ' 1467 Turn Type Pm+u1 Protected Ph.... 8. 2 1 6 ,. Permitted Ph- 3 2 6 Actuated Green, G is) 55 42.1 53.5 53.5 '"- Effective Groon, g (a) 6.5 44.1 55.5 55.5 Actuated g/C Ratio-: L 0.09 063 079 0.79 Clearance Tim. (s) 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehiole Extension (s)- 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 173 2225 391 2806 v/s: Rollo Prot .0.04'.. 0,32 0,04 00.41 we Ratio Perm 0 24 w/o Ratio - 0,46 0,51 0.35 0.52 Uniform Delay, dl 301 7.1 3.4 2.6 Progression Factor 1,00 `1 09 1 00 '1 00 Incremental Delay, d2 2 0 0 1 i1.6 0 7 Delay (of 12.0 8.4 40 3.3 Level of Service G A A A Approach Delay (s) 32.0. :" 3.4 33 Approach LOS C A A ,. Itdl$41 a&(W) Summary, "•",t"`. �"' �; __ . `"'S ',"' HCM Average Conlroi Delay 6.2 HGM Love) 0 S.rvloe A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length (a) 70.0 Sum .l lost 0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of 6ervic. A c Critical Lana Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synohro 5 Repoh Baseline Page 2 RESOURWHIT-ST51 CAP rojects\Bartlett\S ynch ro\Postco nst\P MPostRt7constB2008. sy6 3: Allen Road & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 ,,r- 1 I ' Lane Configurations 1 1' +A 1 ?? Ideal Flow(vphpl) -- 1900 1900 1900,, 1900 1900 -1900-- Lan. Width 12 10 12 12 /0 12 Total lost lime-(e) 4.0 413 4.0 4.0 40 Lane Ulil. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0,95 Fn ti00. 0.85 "0�98 t:00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1 00 1.00 0.95 1,00 Said. Flow(prot) 17,70 1478 3469' ... 1652 3639 ,' . ,, 7ie+v^atuterVeivlid ,yflK,,,,,,rK tµ.Lf Fit Permitted 0.95 loll110 0,12 100 Seitl Flow (penn) 1770 /478 3469 208 3539 Volume (vph) 215 119 1017 154 169 1304 Peek -Four factor, PHF -- 1.00 1.00. 1 oo 1.00 1.00 - Adj. Flow(vph) 2t5 119 t017 154 Ifi9 1.4 LaneGroupFiow(vRh) 2161i8'1.171 -0- 169 1304'- Turn Type pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases :.8 1 2 1 Permitted Phases 8 6 Artuelod Green. G (a)' 13.8 21 4 315 46.2 Efleclive Green, g(a) 14.8 24.4 33.6 47,2 47.2 y' Aolueled g/C Ratio 0,21 0.35 0.48 `:0.67 067 -" -'- • `.` Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 6o 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (e) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3o 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 374 600 1665 338 2386 W. A= Prol.:: _ c0. 12 0.03 00.34.. owc0 37 We Ratio Perm 0.05 0.27 v/o Ratio : 0,57 0, 20 0.70 0.50 0.55 Uniform Delay, d1 24.8 160 14.3 8.4 5.9 Progression Factor 1.00. 1,00 1.00 1,34 173 R, Increm-al Delay, d2 2,1 02 2.5 1.0 02 Delay (a) 2&9 16.1 16a : 123 §q ggpp 10 4 ",irrn �'�r�itt4f Level of Service C R B 8 B Approach Daley (s)- :23.1 i6.e 106 Approach LOS C a B Intors:allen Summe HCM Average Control Delay 14 4 I -.CM Lovol c S:ry co i3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (a) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) I7 0 Inlerseeten Capacity Utilization 64.3 % ICU Level of Service 1.3 t`vj c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Repon Zseline Page I SOURWHIT-ST51 C:\P rojects\Bartlett\Synchro\Postconst\PMPostRt7cons162008, sy6 7: Collins Boulevard & Shelburne Road W412002 ,'- li, 1 1 MdVtiryfent WBL WBR 'NST :NBR SBL SBT Lane Conliycrebons n fL +f Sign Control 'Stop Free Fro: Grade 090 1) Volume (-hih) 0 41 : :I 152 .: 42 0 1558 Peak Hour Factor, 00 1 00 100 1.00 1 t10 100 Hourly flow rate(Voh/h) 0 41 1152�. 42 0 155e tl+eet9.'i jFkk} m.u( a.a'wd.��xxi.i� Pedeelriane Lane Wfdth (il). :..e.,witty+. .«.era.. ,ia�.%v.;r..>-. a.>. «-;�.gs.'�iu,: ..oat i1a) "i-iiri Walking Speed (ft 3I Percent Blockage Right turn llare (ven) tM I on IYoe None M I �n storage veh) vC, conllioting volume 1952 597. 1194 ivo-a„o-1 ,wri,«e I', .Ouf nxwgk 11 ,d)k1Lu!'L,ml o{r•,°�� vC1 stgo I cent vol vC2. 31age 2 coni vol LC s nyle Is) 6.8 69 4.1 IC 2 stays (s) ��nn plr i as..irnw ! r rryaAtSr4ieau'ia^wE4e IF 35 3.3 22 p0 queue tree % 700 91 100 cM capacity(veNh) 56 446 5H0 f�'IYddibn"•L'�`r `. r "rWe'1 NB I N62 ' SB 1 r$82 Volume Total 41 168 426 '. 779 . 779 Volume Left c 0 0 0 0 Volume Right _ 41 0 42 0" 0 . Su..sc �„ a ,y exli•., , ,wx •�-v ,•» . m.. cSH 446 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.45 :0.25 0.46 0.46 Queue Length (ft) 8 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (a) 13.9 0.0 Go 0.0 00 � („a V'"�.'.c "x+ TrM-Nab �' MAT Lane LOS B Approach Delay (a) 13.9 00 0.0 pM'ar.•la� rrrn tt•a'+o-N'MUJWr¢ rF}wrn �Lwa'«i1.�kdxd3�YAiMiNi�xr+t,v%ki'a mow 4iFkfi Approach LOS B Irttereeotlon Summery' i,-tsi A sway. Delay 02 Intersection. Capacity Utilization 46.4% ICU Love l of Service A HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysts Synchro 5 Report Beset- Page 3 RESOURWHIT-ST51 CAP rojects\Bartlett\Synchro\Postconst\PMPostRt7constB2008. sy6 5: Harbor View Road & Shelburne Road 4/4/2002 t t I 1 FAIMMMMEWBIL' "NBT"'-QBR" '$BV""'SST :' ;< EE =k Nam Lane CoMigurasone, Y +u 1 ++ ideal Flow (vpfpl) :1900 ,1900 1900 1900 1900.. 1900 Lane Width 16 16 12 12 10 12 To at Lost time (a) 4.0 4o 4o 40 Lana Utll. Factor 1.00 0.95 I.00 0.95 FM -0.89 1:00 1.00 " 1.00 Fit Protected 0,99 1.00 a95 1.00 Said. Flow (pro[) 1661 3530. 1652-.".3539 Fit Permitted 0.99 1.00 0.18 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) '' 1861. 3530 3053639 Volume (vpn) 16 73 1126 t 9 159 1467 Peek' -hour factor, PHF 1.00. 1.00 1.00 100 1.00. 1.00 Ad1. Flow (vph) I6 73 1126 ':9 159 1467 Lane Group Flow(vph) 89 0"'1145 , i59 1467 Turn Typo pm.pt Protected Phaeae 0 2 1 6 Permitted Phas:s 8 2 6 Acluatrul Green, G a) '..5.6 40.8 53.4 534 ,,,g,,,., ,,..a.w+.uw.awxeuw «,rgiax,Ax• xu ^^a.[ce� Etfeotivo Green, g (c) 6.6 42.8 554 554 Actuated g/C Ratio :0.09 0.51. 0.79 0.79 Clearance Time (a) 50 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension(a): 3.0 3.0- 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 175 2158 407 2801 v/s Ratio Piet c0.05 0.32 -. 0.05 c0.41 i v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 v/o.Rel1 0.51 0,53 0.39. 062 Uniform Delay, dt 30.2 7.8 3.8 2.6 Progression Factor :: 1:00:. 1,10 1 00 '.:1 00 _ Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 0.7 0.6 0.7 Delay (e) 3as 9.3 4,4 3.3 „ level of Service C A A A Approach Delay (a): 32.5 ..., �""„t9.3 3.4 Approach LOS C A A 'irlinaay,,.., HCM Average Control Delay 6.7 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to. Capacity ratio 052 ... Actuated Cycle Length (a) 70o Sum c1 lost Limo (e) 8,0 Intereeoibn Capacity UIIAzatbm. 65 9 % ICU: Levee of Sevice A , c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report Baseline Page 2 RESOURWHIT-ST51 N O O RJ 0 Page: 1 �W'W\( Ww ,2.'b Accident Reporting System Time: 09:28 AM Accident Summary ft 3 (J t2o1 Years of Data: 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 'Pie Pate Sell No. Ta- Marker hiAUDD�," plate Report: I Date: 03/21 !2002 rN.. ul No. of Cause of Accident Typo of Accident _ u Irl tors Fatalities Direction Route: US-7 296S71 Sheibir c 1 17 07;24!96 19:00 Clear Damns Hit bicyclist 0 I South 5117 Shelburne 1 58 05111l99 is 45 Clear Followed too Chuel) Rear -nd 0 0 South '-96952 Shelburne 1.98 W;03196 11:0) Sao+r Weather Conditions Antic collision, turning in opposite direction 0 0 North Shelburne 1.98 02A 96 1491 Clear Fw mud texr Cb�selt• _ Rzar t _ i1 -•_297781 1 3654 Shelburne 2 d4 1WIT98 1701 linknoun Inattention Angle collision, turning in opposite direction 1 U NA b%297974 �` Shelburne 3.46 03' 25,% 13:00 Cloudy Failed ill Yield Righ( of Way Angle collision, tru ring in apposite direction 4 0 Fast v 299638 Sheltwmc 4,64 08+1 flf% 13:00 Clear folia+ved too Closely Rear -cad 2 (1 North 5013 Shefbiume 4.80 04/27:99 1540 Cloud Oporluol's physical Condtiol Rear -end 1 0 South 3lX).'f6 South Burlington 0,03 11•1)3,-96 14,00 Cloady Followed too Closely Rear -and 2 0 North -05 Soalh Bmhogton 0,03 0 21 1 INS IS 1_2 Clear Followed tan Closely Rear end 0 0 NIA •✓ ; v `� 3041162 South Burlington 0.08 08,121;97 19:00 Rain Followed im Clmrly Rear -cad 1 0 North 298462 South Burlington 0 10 051091.3`6 I800 Cloudy Followed icon Closely Rear -end U 0 Serih 0 , 303699 Sarah Burlington 0.10 0721:77 16:00 Cloudy Felio-ed tea Closely Rear tad 3 O North L w 1527 South Burlington 0.10 (N ••25i9g 17:28 Cloudy Inattention Rear- rut 3 0 Scullt Vl � , -- 1902 South Bm{inglon 0,10 0725198 13:02 Clear Followed tor) Closely Rear end 2 0 South U3657 South Budinglon 0,10 i2!18!98 16:39 N;A Failed to Yield Right of Way Right anelc, broadside 0 0 East ,U 7304 South Budinglen 0.10 11l14)99 13:21 Cloudy Followed too Chilly Rear -end 1 0 South 1075 South Burlington 0.11 05/01/98 1494 Clear F.Raw•ed too Closclg Rea -end 0 0 NtA ¢.t 1911_ South Burlington (/ I I 08.12 ti9S 13:00 Clew: Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle, In naadsidc 1 0 East Q) 41_14 Somh Burlington 0. 1? 01!OV99 IS 19 Cleo; Full W can Closely Rear -end I 1) South 764n) South Burlington 0. 12 11!12'99 1 624 Cloudy Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle, broadside 0 0 Litt 10319 South Ilmiingmn 0.12 07l11700 12:10 Clew Failed to Yield Righl of Way Right angle, broadside 0 0 East U 305598 South Burlington 0,13 P>>^3!97 12:m Clear Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle, broadside _ 0 Last N 2202 South Buriiagtan 0.13 09!16;98 1701 Clear Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle. broadside 1 0 Fmt H 300543 South Birdit•,gton 0.14 11+96%96 17W Clear Followed mo Closely Rea: -end 1 0 South 5118 South Bwlingrnn 0.14 05.:"22:99 10:50 Clear Failed to Yield Right of W- Right angle; broadside 1 0 NiA 5134 South Burlingterr OA $ 03 05."99 15 24 Clear Failed to Yield Right of Way flight angle, broadside 1 0 E:ct 302930 South Burlington OA 8 (15.!1'_•'9-1 1400 Rain Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle, broadside 1 0 Last 303751 South Burlington 0.18 O5l27:97 1000 Clear Other improper Action Rear -end 0 0 Nu ,h 1780 South Burlington 920 07; I8%98 15:10 Clear Inattention Rear -end O 0 South 303509 Sarah Burlington 0.21 07t]1%97 18.00 Clear Failure to Keep in Proper Lane or Running off Road flight auele. broadside 2 0 South 2992 1 South Burlinglnn 1,123 07!23I96 17:00 Clardy Followed too Closely Rear -end 0 0 Small YX)136 South Burlington ,i.23 10.110r96 0900 Rain Inattention Right angle, broadsidc 0 0 South 30174fi South Burlington 423 OVDiW 14:00 Clear Followed too Closely Rear -end o 0 South 297924 SouthBuriingo: 021 02/29i96 1900 Clear butlention Rear -end 2 - 0 Scmth M M 305117 South Berlin ton g 0.29 I V07!97 19:m) Clem Failed la Yield Right Hit ksuian rennin walking, siaadin laying pat g� ): g: P 1 0 South CV )i31 South Burlington 029 06:26i98 1759 Cloudy Follo++-ed too Closely Rear land 1 0 South 00 298362 South Butiingtan 0.45 04!01,1*% 12:06 Clear btauentiou Angie collision. turning in same direction t1 0 Norrh CA 299680 South Burlington 0.45 08.'28i96 11:00 Clear Other Improper Action Angle collision, taming in saute direciou 0 0 South 00 CIJ 298054 Saudi Bmiingam i1.53 03!09i96 18 00 Cloudy Follmrcd rat Clr•ely Rear -end 3 0 Somh C) 299341 South Burlingtm 0.53 07125l96 Itaxi Rain We.ther Condtions Rear -end 1 0 North 00 30(t'_93 South Burlineton 0.53 11;07`96 09-.W Rain Followedtoo Closely Rear -and 1 O South 301614 South Burlington 0.53 01 15i97 08:00 Clear hnamiltiou Rcar-end 1 0 Nordt 3465 South Builingion 0.53 1024:98 12:50 Clear inattention Rear -end 1 0 South Crti _&J5 South Burlington 0.53 101N,98 17:45 Rain Followed auo Closely Rear -end 0 0 South 3586 South Bwiiogron 0.53 1 t/30:98 1236 Clear Disregarded Tcxnf is Signs, Signals, Road Matitines Right angle, broadside 3 0 South to 3655 South Burlington 0,53 12.! 18N6 13.00 Clear Disregartkd Traffic Signs, Signals, Road Makings Right angle. broadside 0 0 Fast O SOIS South Burlington 053 Q4i1 !99 17:49 Clear FOloa-ed too Closely Rear -end 2 0 South N 8149 South Burlington 0,53 Ol!22,100 1245 Clear Inattention Rase -end i 0 South 9943 South Burtingtnn 0.53 08!31 00 20:20 Clear Visibility Obstructed Ritbicyclist 0 0 North 302017 South Bwifnguu. 0.56 0011,97 23:00 Snow Other hnproper Action Angle c ullisioe., turning in apposite direction 0 0 South 3587 South Burlington 0-56 I V226,98 14:3i Cloudy Failed to Yield Right of Way Angle collision., turning in sane direction 1 0 East r•i "+ 7420 Somh Burlington 0.56 11.23.99 1548 Cloudy Made an Improper -turn Right angle,!roadside 1 0 Fast E"r 11279 South Burlington 0.57 12i30l00 I158 Cloudy Followed too Closely Rear -crud 1 0 South 4318 South Btrlingtnn 0.59 01129,199 11:15 Clear Followed too Closely Rcar-end 2 0 NIA 4V 2861 South Butlingtan 0,61 12l10)98 10:07 Cloudy Follaw ed too [lamely Rear -end 0 0 N.lA O * This Accident occurred to the last Highway Improvement Project. This Data should not be used in an Analysis with other Accidents cur prior \ at the saute location. UNK indicates the Location (Mile Marker) is Unknown. M O M O O N O N M O Page: 2 Accident Reporting System Report: 1 Time: 09:29 AM Accident Summary Date: 03/21/2002 Years of Data: 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 Mlle Dore No. ut iiso. ut _ 5eg inn. Town Marker M111DDlY): Time 3\'cathcr Cause of .tcrxlcnt _-- _ Type of Accident _._-„-. In cries F:tta6tiea Ifirectlon Route: US-7 Conti-ed... 9947 Sash Bunlingrot 0.63 09!03.'00 11 11 Cloudy Uriying'foe Fast fur Conditions Rezr-end 1 G North 8150 South Builington 0.64 0121W 19,18 Cicar Followed la+CYoscly Rear -end 0 G South 8391 South Builington 0.63 01 IVW 07:11 Snow Followed too Closely R r-end 1 0 South 9i)5 South Burlington 0.65 0&-9.00 12:09 Goa Followed son Closely Rear -end 3 G South 303553 South Burlington O.69 07;08,97 17:00 Cleat 01arating Vehicle in Erratic. Reckless, Careless, Negiigert Sideswipe Gam opposite direction _ 0 South or Aggressive Matmcr 3464 Sash Burlington 0.69 1028r98 13:46 Rain Foltow•ed too Closely lt=r- nd 1 0 NIA 3656 South Burlington 0,76 I2,^i'98 16:33 C'l.ach Failed to Yield Right of Way Angle collision, turning in same direction 0 0 NiA 29SO65 South Burlington 0.81 03:12% 06.00 Clear Fatiguedi4slcep Rear cad .. 0 NOW. 5926 South Burlington 0.81 07•a199 01:46 Clear D%VI Cutting (side`. alk, median, etc.) - right side 1 0 South 11278 South Burlington 0.83 12:f6100 22:30 Rain Improper- Crossing Bit pedestrian running. walking, standing, playing 1 0 South 6114 South Burlington 094 09;27`99 15:09 Rain Inareruion flit bicyclist 1 0 West 2;2e South Burlington 0.85 09.40098 1905 Cloudy Followed too Closely Rear -end 3 0 South 303707 South ➢uslington 086 OV26197 14:00 Cloudy Inatteanat Rear -end 1 0 North 303994 South Harlington 0.86 OR^1!97 08:00 Cloudy I)auiog Hit bicyclist 1 0 West 303529 South Burlington 0.87 07;(18t97 12 6C) Clear Inanentinn Right angle, broadside 0 0 South 1204 South Burlington 0.87 05.18!98 14:40 Clear Disracted Rcar-cnd 1 0 N;A 1525 South Burlington 0 87 07A)4198 17:05 Rain Driving-Foo Fast for Conditions Res -end 1 0 South 2327 South Burlington 0.87 0%09.198 16:15 C{wdy Disregarded Twfic Sins, Signals. Road Markings Right angle, broadsuk 5 0 Saudi 5016 South Burlington 0.87 0441,49 14:Ob Clem Exceeded Audtotized Speed Limn Rear -end I 0 South 7599 South Burlingon 0.87 12.117:99 I6:00 Unknown Made an Improper Turn Right tangle, broadside 1 0 N A 8188 South Butlington 0.87 01;03W, 08:13 Clear Followed ton Closely Rear -end 0 0 N!A 9210 South Burlington 0.87 07r03100 17:26 Rain Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle, broadside 3 0 West 10370 South Burlinton 0.87 1WA9'00 14:38 Cloudy Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle; broadside 1 0 South 303119 South Burlington 0.88 06.•01'97 1100 Rain Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle, broadside 1 0 North 187 South Burlington 0.88 01;2698 13:19 Ck:u Followed too Closely Rca)-cnd 0 0 NIA 1782 South Burlington 0.88 07;14'98 15.44 c1c. Other Imp-pe, Action Rew,nd 2 0 NIA 8151 South Butlington 0.88 01:21_'OC 13A2 Cloudy Followed too Closely Rear-enr: 1 0 NIA 303842 South Burlington 0.94 07; Iti197 13:00 Clear Followed ton Closely Reat-and 4 0 North 2201 Smith Butlington 0.94 WAU.'98 17:15 Rain Followed too Closely Rear -end 2 0 N;A 3944 South Burlington 096 09tI6t98 17:45 rink o.n Inipt-c Lame C.hsnge Angle collision, turning in same direction 0 0 Soul} 299362 South Burlington 1.06 0[ 30.'A6 21:00 Cloudy Improper Crossing Hi, pedesnian mmting, walking, standing, playing 1 0 Smith 298297 South Burlington 1.01 04'23 96 13:00 Rain Other Impnnper Action Vehicle backed into another,ehicde 0 North 298544 South Burlington 1,07 W.121r96 12:UO Cloudy Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle, broadside 3 0 South 9097 South Burlington 1.12 06.18'00 14:35 Rain Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle, broadside 0 East _298182 South Burlington 1.13 03;27'96 13:00 Cloudy FatiguedAsleep Rear-cnd 3 0 South 300236 South Burlington 1.13 I0110f96 12:00 Rain blade au Improper Team Right angle, broculs"ide 0 0 West 300223 South Burliagson L 13 10.'11196 14:00 Chwdy Failed to Yield Right of Way Rig§t angle, bi w&ide 0 0 North 3042122 South Budiognoan 1.13 olsill97 16:00 Rain Followed loo Closely Rear-cnd 1 0 t)orth 1779 South Burlingtrn 1.13 071,20;98 11:12 Rain Made an tsuproper Tun) .Angle collision, turning in opposite direction 0 0 WA 2329 South Burlington 113 0911898 17:08 Clear Inattention Rcs-end 1 0 N,A 3945 South Burlington 1.13 I0110i98 211:55 Rain Improper Crossing Hit pedestrian running, walking, standing, playing 1 0 South 5519 South Burlington 1.13 0-", . ;99 05:41 Ckar Fail- to Keep in Prof., lame err R outing off Road Pole (telephone. electrical, etc.) - right side u 0 NIA 5608 South Burlington 1.13 05.?7i99 07:26 Clear Operator's Physical Coldtion Curing (sidt, alk, median, etc) - left side 0 0 NA 5924 South Burlingum 1.13 07-28 99 12:33 Clear Disregardel'fraffic Signs, Signals. Road Markings Right angle, broadside 1 0 South 6437 South Burlington 1.13 08121:99 11:39 Unknown Followed too Closely Rw-end 1 0 N/A 8237 South Burlington I.13 0105100 10:20 Slut, Hail (Frzezing Rain or Drizzle) Inattention Rem' -end 1 0 South 10369 South Burlington t. 13 11117.1)0 13:48 Clear hmuention Rea -end 2 0 South 11009 South Burlington 1.13 21.40 Snow Disregarded Tm(lic Signs, Signals, Road Makings Right angle, broadside 1 0 N!A 1315 Soudn Budinglot 1.16 052619E 1540 Clear Followed too Closely Rear -end 2 0 N A 302148 South Burlington 1.24 02i28:97 14.(A) Cloudy Disregarded Trailie Signs, Signnah, Road Markings Right angle, tu'oadside 2 0 South 303345 South Burlington 1,34 0611W97 19.00 Clear Inattention Rear -end 1 0 South 5605 South Burlington 1.24 05!26i99 12:39 Clear Failure to maintain control Rcn'-cnd 1 0 Souds 6752 South Bur`inglot 1.24 09/03i99 15.00 Clear Disregarded Traffic Signs, Signals. Road h1arNngs Angle collision, turning in same direction 0 0 NIA 9490 South Burlington 1.24 07A 4:00 12:58 Clear Followed lot Closely Rear -end 2 0 NIA 10033 South Burlington 1.24 09A5100 14.27 Cloudy Inattentiva Rear -end 0 if N,.4 ) 526 South Builington 1.25 O6:'19:98 13.12 Cloudy Followed too Closely Rear -end _ 0 N.:A * This ?accident occurred prior to the last Highway Improvement Project. This Data should not be used in an Analysis with other Accidents at the same location. LINK indicates the Location_ (Mile Marker) is unknown. O U f-r3:1 .CI U C` S N O r-i N M 0 Page: 3 Accident Reporting System Report: 1 Time: 09:30 AM Accident Summat-nr Date: 03/21/2002 Years of Data: 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 Mik Cate N., at No. of Stu `1o. Tow'n Marker h1IM!DDIVY Time Weather -. _ Canso of Accident_ Tyne of Accident _ Wind F'atalitles Direction Battle: VS-7 Continued -.. 93E1 South Burlington 134 04AWOO 23:39 Cloudy DWI l ,desuian lift pedesimn running. ring. walking, standing, playing 0 1 N.A Milt South Burlington 1,35 06i2&99 14.13 Clear Followed tut Closely Rru-c•nd 0 0 Nia. 302641 South Burlington 1.39 0411i97 13:00 Clear Followed too Closely Rein -cod 0 0 Naih 188 South But 1.39 o1711;98 17:14 Cloudy hailed to Yield Right of Way Right angle, broadside 0 0 WA 9965 South Bwiingtcn 1.39 082500 17:55 Clear M,ide an lmpropx Tum Right angle, broadside 2 0 East. 3D4119 Sash Budinglun 1.411 09.131!97 22:00 Rain Inattention Rear -end I 0 South 178.3 South Burlington 1.40 071259E 21.34 Cleat- Inattention Reer-rod 0 0 South 9757 South Bwlingwn 1.40 09/04100 16:04 Clear Inattention Re„ r-end 4 0 KiA 299367 South Btuiingtnn 1.43 07,%/96 '_':N Rain Exceeded Authorized Speed Limit R w' -nod 4 0 Saudi 302237 Smith Burlington 1.43 02+I 5197 10:00 Clear Followed too Closely Rear -end 2 0 North 363309 South Burlington 1.43 05n7'97 15:00 Clear Followed too Closely Rear -end 1 0 South 303539 South Burlington 1.43 06/18197 16:00 Rain Followed tow Closely Rear -end 1 0 North 304585 South Burlington 1.43 09r79197 14:00 Rain lnattenlion Rear -end 0 0 North 30?926 South Burlington 1.49 07,'28r97 13:00 Clear Inattention Rear -end 1 0 South 2" 19 South Burlingu.ao 1.52 06-13196 22:(16 Rain Followed too Closely Rear -end t) 0 South 299022 South Burlinglat 1.52 OT'05!% 19:00 Clear Failed to Yield Right of Way Angle collision, turning in opinsite direction 0 0 Wes, 299423 South Burlington 1.52 07.31 t96 23:00 Clear Inattention Rear -end 1 0 No ,.4 - 301642 South Burlington 1.52 OVIV97 (18-.N Clear Fol 10wcd too Closely Rear -cod 2 Cl South 303200 South Burlington 1.52 05i2997 14:00 Clear 17atigtuxY.4>leep Rear -end 1 0 North 305081 South Lltoliglen 1.52 11/O5: J7 15:00 Clear Disregarded Ir3ffc Signs, Signals. Road Marking; Right angle, bn.diside 1 0 Nark 1529 South Burlington 1.52 0625-9E 10:35 Cloudy Inattention Rear -end 1 0 South 1913 South Burlington, 1,52 08,27.'98 15.55 Clem- Followed too Closely Reo-end 2 0 NiA 2203 South Burlington 1.52 08128'98 17:4 i Clear Followed too Cknely Rear -cad 0 0 South 2205 South Bu, lington 1.52 09i0898 07:23 Cloudy Dismgmded Traffic Signs, Signals, Road Markings Right angle, broadside: 0 0 Sao* 5925 South Burlington 1-52 0008199 13:12 Cloddy Inattention Rear -rod 1 0 NFA 7598 South But too 1 52 12126 99 12:12 Cloudy Disreguded Traffic Signs, Signals. Road Markings Angle collision, turning in opposite direction 1 0 N:A 30"69 South Iturlingun 1.53 09'28.'97 13:00 Clear' inattention Rear -end 2 0 "'wilt 304734 South Burlington 1.54 16104!97 14: DO Clear Inattention Rear-cnd 0 O North 4837 South Burlinglai 1.63 03.80.'99 12 20 Cloudy Followed too Closely Rear -end 2 0 South 5119 South Burlington 1.63 05i2W99 17:24 Clear Inauentiat Rear-cnd 0 0 South 9755 Saudi Burlington 1.64 09'09-00 13:47 Clear Followed tow C7osety Rear -end I D NFA 6595 Saudi Burlington 1.69 0911C''99 12:15 Clear Failed to field Right of Way Angle collision, luming in oplx ite ditection 1 0 West 8187 South Burlington 1.69 07_iD2/00 1S:22 Clem Made an Improper'furn Right angle, bio.,6ide 1 0 East 9152 South Burlington 169 02103/00 1 1:11 Clear Improper Lane Change Angle collision, to; ring in same direction 1 0 R,A 296987 South Burlington 1.71 01103:96 1100 S.- Exceeded Audwrisd Speed Limit (tight angle. broadside 0 0 South 298744 South Burlington 1.71 OW07i96 14:00 Rain Followed too Closely Rew-d 1 0 Son& 303105 South Burlington 1.71 05,11-97 17:00 Clear Inattention Rear -end 0 0 North 3462 South Burlington 1.71 10124;9g i 3:14 Clear Followed to. Closely Rear -end 0 0 N A 6115 South Burlington 17I 091106;99 11:23 Cloudy Failed to Yield Right of flay Right anAde, broadside 0 0 W'cst 6871 South Burlington 1.71 I0.,'28i99 07:4 7 Clew Improper Crossing Ilit pedesmian running, walking, standing, playing 1 0 N 4 7810 South Burlington 1.71 0111WOO 06:59 Cloudy Failed to field Right of Way flit pedestrian running, walking, standing, playing t 0 ti::1 9211 South Burlington 1.71 06, 19.W i3:36 Clev- NM Rear -end 1 0 N A 9212 South Burlington 1.71 OfW27i00 0906 Rain Odder Roadway Rear -end 1 0 Nilk 297.103 Soul, Burlington 1.?3 02i07 96 1300 Cloudy Inattention Rear -end 0 0 North 297519 South Burlington 1.73 02123i96 08:00 Fog, Smog. Smake Inattention Angle collision, turning in opposite direction 1 0 North 296597 Smith Burlington 1.?3 05126;96 16:00 Cloudy Disregarded 3'rafic Signs, Signals, Road Markings Right angle, broadside 0 0 West 2989$2 South Burlington L73 06`22J96 t l 00 Rain Followed use Closely Rear -end 0 0 North 299980 South Burlington L73 0.9.'11,96 19:W Rain Other Improper Actim Rear -cud 0 0 South 3(XQ48 South Butiington 1,73 10,'15.96 11:00 Clear Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle- broadside 0 0 'North 300875 South Burlington 1 73 11:27.96 13:00 Clear Disregarded Traffic Signs, Signals, Road Markings Right angle, broadside 1 0 Nord, 104452 South Burlington 1-73 09111 i97 23:00 Rain Followed tat Closely Rearrend 3 0 North 523 South Burlington 111 03.05:98 I5'30 Clear Disregarded'fraff c Signs, Signals. Road Markings Right angle, broadside 0 0 N-'A 3463 South Burlington 1 ',3 10'08i98 20. 14 Cloudy Followed ica Cfoaely Rear -cud 1 0 South "'I South Burlington 1.73 12'I5+98 10:44 Clear Disregarded Traffic Signs, Signals, Road Markings Rear -end 0 0 WA 581d South Burlington 1.73 07; 19:99 00:28 Clear Failed to Yield Right of Way Right angle, broadside 1 0 West ;•-.._}.,i. 0 Burlington 000 (1bi26l98 07:27 Rain Followed too Closely Rear -cud _ 0 _ 0 SOm4l _ 6116 Burlington 0-02 O8•'061" 1320 Cloudy ].attention Rear -end 0 0 South * This Accident occurred prior to the last Highway Improvement Project. This Data should not be used in an Analysis with other Accidents at the same location. UNK indicates the Location (Mile Marker) is Unknown. • Consulting Hydrogeologists • Engineers I\N Heindel and Noyes • Eno nmental Scientists P.O. Box 64709 Burlington, Vermont 05406-4709 802-658-0820 Fax 802-860-1014 September 4, 2002 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Bartlett Brook Hydrologic Modeling for Proposed Lakeview at Pillsbury (Larkin Lot 10) Dear Mr. Belair: The attached report presents the results of our hydrologic evaluation of the proposed Lakeview at Pillsbury development (Larkin Lot 10) on Harbor View Road in South Burlington. Our analysis shows that the proposed development, with the stormwater infrastructure documented on the site plans, will not result in increased peak flows at the outlet of the site or at several locations downstream. We recommend that the City approve the stormwater aspect of the proposed development. Please contact me at 655-4222 ext 33 or matt _q-city.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, Matthew Murawski Hydrologist Attachments cc: Mr. John Larkin Mr. William Nedde, K&L U:\PROJECTS\LakeviewStormwater\Lakeview at Pillsbury (Larkin Lot 10) 1313 Report.doc • Consulting Hydrogeologists • Engineers VN Heindel and Noyes • Environmental Scientists PO Box 64709 Burlington, Vermont 05406-4709 802-658-0820 Fax 802-860-1014 LAKEVIEW AT PILLSBURY (LARKIN LOT 10) South Burlington, Vermont BARTLETT BROOK WATERSHED ANALYSIS Prepared for: John P. Larkin, Inc Prepared by: Heindel & Noyes September 4, 2002 • Consulting Hydrogeologists • Engineers 1\/N Heindel and Noyes • Environmental Scientists PO Box 64709 Burlington, Vermont 05406-4709 802-658-0820 Fax 802-860-1014 LAKEVIEW AT PILLSBURY (LARKIN LOT 10) South Burlington, Vermont BARTLETT BROOK WATERSHED ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Lakeview at Pillsbury site is located on Harbor View Road in South Burlington. The proposed development consists of a new commercial building and associated parking and drives. The developer has proposed a detailed stormwater control plan to address the State's stormwater control requirements. Stormwater runoff from the site was evaluated using the Bartlett Brook Stormwater Model. The results were analyzed to determine the impact the development would have on streamflows resulting from the 25-year storm event. The Bartlett Brook Stormwater Model was updated to include the proposed development, and the resulting peak flow rates were analyzed at several downstream locations in the watershed. The analysis indicated that the development, because of the proposed detention pond, would result in decreased peak flows. We conclude that the proposed development is consistent with the goals of the City's Bartlett Brook stormwater zoning overlay. We recommend that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the stormwater aspect of the proposed development. • Consulting Hydrogeologists • Engineers VN Heindel and Noyes • Environmental Scientists PO Box 64709 Burlington, Vermont 05406-4709 802-658-0820 Fax 802-860-1014 LAKEVIEW AT PILLSBURY (LARKIN LOT 10) South Burlington, Vermont BARTLETT BROOK WATERSHED ANALYSIS SUMMARY OF FINDINGS September 4, 2002 1. Heindel & Noyes (H&N) has completed a stormwater runoff analysis of the proposed Lakeview at Pillsbury development on Harbor View Road in South Burlington, Vermont. A Site Plan prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc (dated April 16, 2002) was used in the analysis. 2. The Lakeview at Pillsbury site is located in the Bartlett Brook watershed. A site location map is included in Appendix 1, page 1. 3. The site plan details the construction of a commercial building with associated parking on an approximately 7-acre parcel. A detailed stormwater control plan is provided that conveys most of the runoff from the site through a stormwater detention pond. 4. Stormwater runoff was analyzed using the Bartlett Brook Stormwater Model, modified to reflect the proposed Lakeview at Pillsbury development. The model was first developed by H&N in 1984 using the USDA Soil Conservation Service TR-20 model. H&N has maintained and updated the model since then, and it is now executed using the HydroCad modeling software. The Bartlett Brook Stormwater Model includes existing development as well as approved but unbuilt development within the entire Bartlett Brook watershed. 5. The design storm used in this analysis was the 25-year, 24- hour storm event, which in the Bartlett Brook Watershed is 4.0 inches of rainfall over a 24-hour period. This storm event is the design standard used for all Bartlett Brook runoff evaluations performed in the past by H&N, and is the design storm specified in South Burlington's stormwater zoning ordinance for the watershed. LAKEVIEW AT PILLSBURY (LARKIN LOT 10), SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT - BARTLETT BROOK WATERSHED ANALYSIS 2 6. The proposed development is located in a subwatershed represented in the Bartlett Brook Model as a partially -developed subwatershed with a combination of roads and open space. For this analysis, the subwatershed was modified to reflect the proposed drainage patterns and infrastructure shown on the site plan. 7. Peak runoff rates resulting from the 25-year storm event were determined for pre- and post -development conditions in the stream channel immediately below the site and at downstream locations in the stream channel network. The predicted runoff rates are presented in Table 1. Bartlett Brook Model outputs for pre- and post -development conditions are included in Appendices 2 and 3, respectively. Table 1. Peak Flow Rates (cfs) for Pre- and Post -Development Conditions. Pre- Post- Change Location Development Development Stream Channel Below Site 22.4 16.0 -29% (Reach G in Bartlett Brook Model) Stream Channel at Route 7 69.8 66.5 -4.7% (Reach E in Bartlett Brook Model) Lake Champlain Watershed Outlet 240.8 240.1 -0.3% (Reach A in Bartlett Brook Model) 8. The proposed development, with the stormwater control plan developed by Krebs and Lansing, will result in reduced peak flow rates in the stream channel immediately below the site, at Route 7, and at the watershed outlet at Lake Champlain. 9. Based on the results of the analysis presented here, we find that the proposed development, with the associated stormwater control plan, meets the goals of the Bartlett Brook stormwater zoning overlay. We recommend that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the stormwater aspect of the proposed development. U:\PROJECTS\LAKEVIEWSTORMWATER\LAKEVIEW AT PILLSBURY (LARKIN LOT 10) BB REPORT.DOC 5�luarry186 f •s a 66 \ I f t • J� C .... - �� tr4!• liE'e{�I_-r •* �,'' fi .� I , r }j/ j�`f,, Twin , a r � s' o SITE -t WIN %kl ��G .r�'� t1•�; • , � 4 j1 �i�Y110 8M t i N Lakeview at Pillsbury (Larkin Lot 10) Heindel and Noyes South Burlington, Vermont Hyd ogeolog •Ecology WE Envimnmenml Engmrrnng USGS Site Location Map CONSULTN I SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS S 2000 0 2000 Feet Prepared by.' ----- INFORMATION & -- --A, VISUALIZATION August 27, 2002 SERVICES C:UakevieW1 itdnep.apr Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 1 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems WATERSHED ROUTING 31a 301 `✓ 312 y 306 3I 6 I �31 B gees 303 `L \ 313 311 r 208 �� 305 \ `y 3i9 a a 7 310 309 320 32� 3fi2 361 / J {� 366 37I 369 372 3011 3fie 378 � \ 369 � 302 375 � � 303 30< y 390 y 3— OSUBCATCHMENT ❑ REACH APOND SUBCATCHMENT 301 SUBCATCHMENT 306 SUBCATCHMENT 310 SUBCATCHMENT 312 SUBCATCHMENT 314 SUBCATCHMENT 319 SUBCATCHMENT 361 SUBCATCHMENT 362 SUBCATCHMENT 366 SUBCATCHMENT 368 SUBCATCHMENT 369 = Quayle Run (#1) = Quayle Run (#2) = Harborview RO to Reach K (minus Barone = S.F.H. Dev Runoff = Keari Lane Runoff = Baycourt Condos = Harbor Heights = Harbor Heights RO = GMP = SE Parking = North Parking a LINK -> REACH 303 -> REACH 307 -> REACH 311 -> REACH 313 -> REACH 315 -> POND 320 -> REACH 364 -> REACH 364 -> POND 381 -> POND 378 -> POND 378 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN I Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems Page 2 29 Aug 02 SUBCATCHMENT 371 = Larkin Center Field -> POND 381 I SUBCATCHMENT 372 = Watershed 1 -> POND 381 SUBCATCHMENT 373 = Watershed 2 -> POND 381 SUBCATCHMENT 374 = Sunset Hotel -> POND 378 ISUBCATCHMENT 383 = Shearer Parking -> REACH 389 SUBCATCHMENT 384 = Reyes -> REACH 389 I REACH 303 = Reach R -> REACH 305 REACH 305 = Reach Q -> POND 309 REACH 307 = Reach P -> POND 309 REACH 311 = Reach K -> REACH 318 REACH 313 = Reach M -> REACH 318 IREACH 315 = Reach L/N -> REACH 318 REACH 318 = Reach J -> REACH 323 REACH 323 = Reach I -> POND 381 IREACH 364 = Reach G -> POND 381 REACH 382 = Reach D -> REACH 389 i REACH 389 = Reach C -> POND 390 REACH 3999 = Reach A -> POND 309 = Reach 0 -> REACH 323 IPOND 320 = Baycourt Condos -> REACH 323 POND 378 = Larkin Pond -> POND 381 I POND 381 = Reach E and Culvert at Rt 7 -> REACH 382 POND 390 = Reach B (Brigham Road) -> REACH 3999 LINK 100 = BB1 Reach-Z and everything above -> REACH 389 LINK 200 = BB2 Reach-S and everything above -> REACH 305 LINK 9005 = Barone 5.2 acres 20020130 -> REACH 311 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 3 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 301 Quayle Run (#1) PEAK= 8.42 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= .59 AF ACRES CN 5.00 72 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD All in one 17.7 L=855' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 306 Quayle Run (#2) PEAK= 8.42 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= 59 AF ACRES CN 5.00 72 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD All in one 17.7 L=855' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 310 Harborview RO to Reach K (minus Barone PEAK= 5.05 CFS @ 12.17 HRS, VOLUME= .44 AF ACRES CN 4.80 67 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD All in one 23.6 L=1035' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 312 S.F.H. Dev Runoff PEAK= 11.05 CFS @ 12.17 HRS, VOLUME= .97 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 10.50 67 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD All in one 23.6 L=1035' s=.04 '/' Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 4 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems ISUBCATCHMENT 314 Keari Lane Runoff PEAK= 10.82 CFS @ 12.18 HRS, VOLUME= .97 AF ACRES CN 10.50 67 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD All in one 24.4 L=1080' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 319 Baycourt Condos PEAK= 8.56 CFS @ 11.99 HRS, VOLUME= .44 AF ACRES CN 3.00 77 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD all in one 9.2 L=450' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 361 Harbor Heights PEAK= 11.62 CFS @ 11.99 HRS, VOLUME= .59 AF ACRES CN 4.00 77 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 8.7 L=350' s=.03 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 362 Harbor Heights RO PEAK= 16.23 CFS @ 11.99 HRS, VOLUME= .83 AF ACRES CN 5.00 80 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 8.9 L=405' s=.03 '/' Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 5 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 366 GMP PEAK= 10.87 CFS @ 11.98 HRS, VOLUME= .56 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 3.00 83 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 8.8 L=450' s=.03 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 368 SE Parking PEAK= 1.19 CFS @ 11.88 HRS, VOLUME= 06 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD .19 96 TYPE II 24-HOUR I RAINFALL= 4.00 IN f1 SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS f Method Comment Tc (min) I{ CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: .8 L=65' s=.05 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 369 North Parking PEAK= 2.68 CFS @ 11.88 HRS, VOLUME= .12 AF ACRES CN .45 93 Method Comment CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: L=20' 5=.01 '/' SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Tc (min .9 SUBCATCHMENT 371 Larkin Center Field PEAK= .92 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= .07 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 1.17 60 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 15.8 L=500' s=.04 '/' Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 6 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 372 Watershed 1 PEAK= .22 CFS @ 11.98 HRS, VOLUME= .01 AF ACRES CN .19 60 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 7.1 L=230' s=.057 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 373 Watershed 2 PEAK= 2.51 CFS @ 11.91 HRS, VOLUME= .10 AF ACRES CN .58 82 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 2.6 L=225' s=.125 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 374 Sunset Hotel PEAK= 3.78 CFS @ 11.90 HRS, VOLUME= .17 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD .64 94 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 2.0 L=285' s=.12 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 383 Shearer Parking PEAK= 32.51 CFS @ 11.98 HRS, VOLUME= 1.79 AF ACRES CN 7.00 92 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 8.9 L=700' s=.03 '/' Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 7 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 384 Reyes PEAK= 1.92 CFS @ 12.05 HRS, VOLUME= .13 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 2.00 61 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 13.0 L=405' s=.04 '/' Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 8 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5.11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems REACH 303 Reach R Qin = 8.42 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= Qout= 7.81 CFS @ 12.21 HRS, VOLUME= DEPTH END AREA DISCH 59 AF 59 AF, ATTEN= 7%, LAG= 7.2 MIN (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 6' x 2' CHANNEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .21 .20 1.39 3.23 n= .04 .40 3.16 10.98 LENGTH= 800 FT .60 5.31 23.15 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT .86 8.68 46.10 1.20 14.06 89.65 1.60 21.79 163.00 2.00 31.05 263.29 REACH 305 Reach Q STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .32 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 3.2 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 4.2 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Qin = 19.53 CFS @ 14.87 HRS, VOLUME= 12.27 AF Qout= 19.53 CFS @ 14.94 HRS, VOLUME= 12.23 AF, ATTEN= 0%, LAG= 4.1 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 6' x 2' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .25 '/' PEAK DEPTH= .55 FT .20 1.36 3.20 n= .04 PEAK VELOCITY= 4.3 FPS .40 3.04 10.72 LENGTH= 600 FT TRAVEL TIME = 2.3 MIN .60 5.04 22.33 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS .86 8.12 43.86 1.20 12.96 84.04 1.60 19.84 150.70 2.00 28.00 240.75 REACH 307 Reach P Qin = 8.42 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= Qout= 7.88 CFS @ 12.20 HRS, VOLUME= DEPTH END AREA DISCH 59 AF 59 AF, ATTEN= 6°%, LAG= 6.7 MIN (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 6' x 2' CHANNEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .54 .20 1.27 3.09 n= .04 .40 2.70 9.97 LENGTH= 800 FT .60 4.27 19.98 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT .86 6.53 37.47 1.20 9.87 67.97 1.60 14.34 115.33 2.00 19.41 175.79 STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .34 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 3.5 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 3.8 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 9 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5.11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems REACH 311 Reach K Qin = 10.47 CFS @ 12.16 HRS, VOLUME= Qout= 10.33 CFS @ 12.22 HRS, VOLUME= DEPTH END AREA DISCH 97 AF 97 AF, ATTEN= 1%, LAG= 3.6 MIN (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 5' x 2' CHANNEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .38 .20 1.11 2.62 n= .04 .40 2.42 8.66 LENGTH= 500 FT .60 3.95 17.76 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT .86 6.25 34.27 1.20 9.79 64.38 1.60 14.74 113.26 2.00 20.53 178.13 STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .44 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 3.8 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 2.2 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS REACH 313 Reach M Qin = 11.05 CFS @ 12.17 HRS, VOLUME= .97 AF Qout= 10.92 CFS @ 12.21 HRS, VOLUME= .97 AF, ATTEN= 1%, LAG= 2.7 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 5' x 2' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .32 /' PEAK DEPTH= .44 FT .20 1.13 2.65 n= .04 PEAK VELOCITY= 3.8 FPS .40 2.50 8.83 LENGTH= 350 FT TRAVEL TIME = 1.5 MIN .60 4.13 18.30 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS .86 6.61 35.76 1.20 10.50 68.10 1.60 16.00 121.43 2.00 22.50 193.10 REACH 315 Reach L/N Qin = 10.82 CFS @ 12.18 HRS, VOLUME= Qout= 10.69 CFS @ 12.22 HRS, VOLUME= DEPTH END AREA DISCH 97 AF 97 AF, ATTEN= 1%, LAG= 2.5 MIN (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 5' x 2' CHANNEL I 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .44 .20 1.09 2.60 n= .04 .40 2.36 8.53 LENGTH= 350 FT .60 I 3.82 17.36 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT .86 5.98 33.18 1.20 9.27 61.63 1.60 13.82 107.23 2.00 19.09 167.09 STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .45 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 3.9 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 1.5 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 10 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems REACH 318 Reach J Qin = 31.98 CFS @ 12.22 HRS, VOLUME= 2.90 AF Qout= 31.52 CFS @ 12.27 HRS, VOLUME= 2.90 AF, ATTEN= 1%, LAG= 3.2 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SO -FT) (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 .20 1.12 3.02 .40 2.48 10.06 .60 4.09 20.80 .86 6.54 40.54 1.20 10.36 77.02 1.60 15.76 136.99 2.00 22.12 217.42 REACH 323 5' x 2' CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE= .33 n= .035 LENGTH= 600 FT SLOPE= .04 FT/FT Reach I STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .74 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 5.8 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 1.7 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Qin = 57.12 CFS @ 12.28 HRS, VOLUME= 16.09 AF Qout= 56.85 CFS @ 12.30 HRS, VOLUME= 16.07 AF, ATTEN= 0%, LAG= .7 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 .20 1.13 2.65 .40 2.52 8.87 .60 4.16 18.42 .86 6.69 36.06 1.20 10.65 68.86 1.60 16.26 123.08 2.00 22.90 196.14 5' x 2' CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE= .31 n= .04 LENGTH= 150 FT SLOPE= .04 FT/FT STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= 1.08 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 6.2 FPS TRAVEL TIME _ .4 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS REACH 364 Reach G Qin = 27.84 CFS @ 11.99 HRS, VOLUME= 1.42 AF Qout= 22.37 CFS @ 12.15 HRS, VOLUME= 1.42 AF, ATTEN= 20%, LAG= DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (S -FAT) (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 .35 2.47 8.23 .70 5.68 28.12 1.05 9.64 59.61 1.51 15.89 119.54 2.10 25.96 234.26 I 2.80 40.56 429.08 3.50 58.12 697.12 6' x 3.5' CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE= .33 n= .04 LENGTH= 1750 FT SLOPE= .04 FT/FT 9.6 MIN STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .61 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 4.7 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 6.2 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS IData for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 11 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 I HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems REACH 382 Reach D Qin = 69.77 CFS @ 12.33 HRS, VOLUME= 18.32 AF Qout= 66.65 CFS @ 12.48 HRS, VOLUME= 18.19 AF, ATTEN= 4%, LAG= 9.2 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 7' x 5' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD I 0.00 0.0 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .33 '/' PEAK DEPTH= 1.00 FT .50 4.3 19.16 n= .04 PEAK VELOCITY= 6.6 FPS 1.00 10.0 66.66 LENGTH= 2000 FT TRAVEL TIME = 5.0 MIN I1.50 17.3 143.63 SLOPE= .047 FT/FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS 2.15 29.1 293.20 3.00 48.3 585.11 4.00 76.5 1089.25 5.00 110.8 1791.65 REACH 389 Reach C Qin = 241.5 CFS @ 12.75 HRS, VOLUME= 58.34 AF Qout= 241.3 CFS @ 12.76 HRS, VOLUME= 58.32 AF, ATTEN= 0%, LAG= .5 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 6' x 2' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD I 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .3 '/' PEAK DEPTH= 2.15 FT .20 1.33 3.04 n= .04 PEAK VELOCITY= 8.6 FPS .40 2.93 10.09 LENGTH= 135 FT TRAVEL TIME _ .3 MIN .60 4.80 20.78 SLOPE= .037 FT/FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS .86 7.63 40.31 2 x FINER ROUTING 1.20 12.00 76.11 1.60 18.13 134.56 2.00 25.33 212.49 REACH 3999 Reach A Qin = 241.1 CFS @ 12.77 HRS, VOLUME= 58.32 AF Qout= 240.8 CFS @ 12.80 HRS, VOLUME= 58.23 AF, ATTEN= 0%, LAG= 2.0 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 6' x 2' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD I 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .3 '/' PEAK DEPTH= 2.18 FT .20 1.33 2.96 n= .04 PEAK VELOCITY= 8.4 FPS .40 2.93 9.81 LENGTH= 570 FT TRAVEL TIME = 1.1 MIN .60 4.80 20.21 SLOPE= .035 FT/FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS .86 7.63 39.20 1.20 12.00 74.02 1.60 18.13 130.87 2.00 25.33 206.67 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 12 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 309 Reach O Qin = 22.54 CFS @ 12.29 HRS, VOLUME= 12.82 AF Qout= 22.22 CFS @ 12.31 HRS, VOLUME= 12.75 AF, ATTEN= 1%, LAG= 1.6 MIN ELEVATION (FT) AREA (SF) INC.STOR (CF) CUM.STOR (CF) I 160.0 1750 0 0 160.5 2010 940 940 161.0 2288 1075 2015 161.5 2584 1218 3233 162.0 2898 1371 4603 162.5 3230 1532 6135 163.0 3580 1703 7838 163.5 3948 1882 9720 164.0 4334 2071 11790 164.5 4738 2268 14058 I 165.0 5160 2475 16533 STOR-IND METHOD PEAK STORAGE = 4662 CF PEAK ELEVATION= 162.0 FT FLOOD ELEVATION= 165.0 FT START ELEVATION= 160.0 FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Tdet= 4.6 MIN (12.75 AF) ## ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES 1 P 161.0' 5.6' x 4.7' CULVERT n=.023 L=95' S=.021/' Ke=.25 Cc=.9 Cd=.72 POND 320 Baycourt Condos Qin = 8.56 CFS @ 11.99 HRS, VOLUME= Qout= 5.27 CFS @ 12.08 HRS, VOLUME= ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR (FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) 190.0 0 0 0 191.0 324 162 162 192.0 538 431 593 193.0 740 639 1232 194.0 1011 876 2108 195.0 1600 1306 3413 44 AF 44 AF, ATTEN= 38%, LAG= 5.6 MIN STOR-IND METHOD PEAK STORAGE = 2804 CF PEAK ELEVATION= 194.5 FT FLOOD ELEVATION= 195.0 FT START ELEVATION= 190.0 FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Tdet= 13.1 MIN (.44 AF) # ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES 1 P 191.0' 12" CULVERT n=.01 L=150' S=.11/' Ke=.875 Cc=.9 Cd=.48 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 13 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 378 Larkin Pond Qin = 7.51 CFS @ 11.89 HRS, VOLUME= .35 AF Qout= 1.51 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME= .35 AF, ATTEN= 80%, LAG= 7.7 MIN ELEVATION CON.AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR WET.AREA STOR-IND METHOD (FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) (SF) PEAK STORAGE = 5223 CF 156.0 I 769 0 0 769 PEAK ELEVATION= 159.2 FT 157.0 1273 1010 1010 1285 FLOOD ELEVATION= 160.0 FT 158.0 1855 1555 2565 1884 START ELEVATION= 156.0 FT 159.0 2493 2166 4732 2543 SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS I 160.0 3308 2891 7622 3380 Tdet= 37.6 MIN (.35 AF) I # ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES ` 1 P 156.0' 6" CULVERT n=.01 L=20' S=.0051/' Ke=.6 Cc=.9 Cd=.56 POND 381 Reach E and Culvert at Rt 7 Qin = 74.65 CFS @ 12.25 HRS, VOLUME= 18.59 AF Qout= 69.77 CFS @ 12.33 HRS, VOLUME= 18.32 AF, ATTEN= 7%, LAG= 4.7 MIN ELEVATION (FT) CON.AREA (SF) INC.STOR (CF) CUM.STOR (CF) WET.AREA (SF) 145.0 7813 0 0 7813 ` 145.7 8573 5733 5733 8605 I 146.4 9369 6278 12011 9435 147.1 10199 6847 18857 10301 147.8 11065 7440 26298 11204 148.5 11966 8059 34357 12143 149.2 12903 8702 43059 13120 149.9 13857 9364 52423 14117 150.6 14882 10057 62479 15184 151.3 I 15924 10780 73259 16270 152.0 17002 11522 84781 17395 STOR-IND METHOD PEAK STORAGE = 32132 CF PEAK ELEVATION= 148.3 FT FLOOD ELEVATION= 152.0 FT START ELEVATION= 145.0 FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Tdet= 14.3 MIN (18.32 AF) ## ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES 1 P 145.5' 48" CULVERT n=.024 L=510' S=.0291/' Ke=.047 Cc=.9 Cd=.86 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 14 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems IPOND 390 Reach B (Brigham Road) Qin = 241.3 CFS @ 12.76 HRS, VOLUME= 58.32 AF Qout= 241.1 CFS @ 12.77 HRS, VOLUME= 58.32 AF, ATTEN= 0%, LAG= .6 MIN ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD (FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) PEAK STORAGE = 3026 CF 100.0 I 0 0 0 PEAK ELEVATION= 104.9 FT 100.5 120 30 30 FLOOD ELEVATION= 105.0 FT 101.0 180 75 105 START ELEVATION= 100.0 FT I 101.5 240 105 210 SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS 102.0 300 135 345 2 x FINER ROUTING 102.5 360 165 510 Tdet= .1 MIN (58.32 AF) 103.0 420 195 705 103.5 480 225 930 104.0 1000 370 1300 104.5 2000 750 2050 105.0 L 3000 1250 3300 # ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES I 1 P 100.0' 7.67' x 4.33' CULVERT n=.023 L=60' 5=.0121/' Ke=.304 Cc=.9 Cd=.69 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020130 Page 15 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5.11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems LINK 100 BB1 Reach-Z and everything above fff Qout= 196.8 CFS @ 12.82 HRS, VOLUME= 38.23 AF, SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS REACH 1999 from BB1 Reach-Z 20020130 "Reach Z" LINK 200 BB2 Reach-S and everything above Qout= 19.10 CFS @ 14.90 HRS, VOLUME= 11.68 AF, SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS REACH 2999 from bb2 Reach-S 20020130 "Reach S" LINK 9005 Barone 5.2 acres 20020130 Qout= 5.44 CFS @ 12.15 HRS, VOLUME= 53 AF, SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS REACH 99 from L9301 Barone POST 20020131 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 1 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems WATERSHED ROUTING OSUBCATCHMENT ❑ REACH APOND SUBCATCHMENT 301 = Quayle Run (#1) SUBCATCHMENT 306 = Quayle Run (#2) SUBCATCHMENT 310 = Harborview RO to Reach K (minus Barone SUBCATCHMENT 312 = S.F.H. Dev Runoff SUBCATCHMENT 314 = Keari Lane Runoff SUBCATCHMENT 319 = Baycourt Condos SUBCATCHMENT 362 SUBCATCHMENT 366 SUBCATCHMENT 368 SUBCATCHMENT 369 = Harbor Heights RO = GMP = SE Parking = North Parking SUBCATCHMENT 371 = Larkin Center Field LINK -> REACH 303 -> REACH 307 -> REACH 311 -> REACH 313 -> REACH 315 -> POND 320 -> REACH 364 -> POND 381 -> POND 378 -> POND 378 -> POND 381 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 2 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 I 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 372 = Watershed 1 -> POND 381 ISUBCATCHMENT 373 = Watershed 2 -> POND 381 SUBCATCHMENT 374 = Sunset Hotel -> POND 378 SUBCATCHMENT 383 = Shearer Parking -> REACH 389 SUBCATCHMENT 384 = Reyes -> REACH 389 REACH 303 = Reach R -> REACH 305 REACH 305 = Reach Q -> POND 309 REACH 307 = Reach P -> POND 309 REACH 311 = Reach K -> REACH 318 REACH 313 = Reach M -> REACH 318 REACH 315 = Reach L/N -> REACH 318 REACH 318 = Reach J -> REACH 323 REACH 323 = Reach I -> POND 381 REACH 364 = Reach G -> POND 381 IREACH 382 = Reach D -> REACH 389 REACH 389 = Reach C -> POND 390 REACH 3999 = Reach A -> POND 309 = Reach 0 -> REACH 323 POND 320 = Baycourt Condos -> REACH 323 POND 378 = Larkin Pond -> POND 381 POND 381 = Reach E and Culvert at Rt 7 -> REACH 382 POND 390 = Reach B (Brigham Road) -> REACH 3999 LINK 101 BB1 Reach-Z and everything above -> REACH 389 LINK 200 - BB2 Reach-S and everything above -> REACH 305 LINK 9301 = Barone 5.2 acres 20020130 -> REACH 311 LINK 9302 = Lakeview at Pillsbury (outflow from main p -> REACH 364 LINK 9303 = Lakeview at Pillsbury Post I -> REACH 364 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 3 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 301 Quayle Run (#1) PEAK= 8.42 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= 59 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 5.00 72 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD All in one 17.7 L=855' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 306 Quayle Run (#2) PEAK= 8.42 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= .59 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 5.00 72 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD All in one 17.7 L=855' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 310 Harborview RO to Reach K (minus Barone PEAK= 5.05 CFS @ 12.17 HRS, VOLUME= .44 AF ACRES CN 4.80 67 Method CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD L=1035' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 312 Comment All in one S.F.H. Dev Runoff PEAK= 11.05 CFS @ 12.17 HRS, VOLUME= .97 AF ACRES CN 10.50 67 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS min 23.6 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD All in one 23.6 L=1035' s=.04 '/' Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 4 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 314 Keari Lane Runoff PEAK= 10.82 CFS @ 12.18 HRS, VOLUME= .97 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 10.50 67 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD All in one 24.4 L=1080' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 319 Baycourt Condos PEAK= 8.56 CFS @ 11.99 HRS, VOLUME= .44 AF Il ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 3.00 77 TYPE II 24-HOUR f RAINFALL= 4.00 IN ` SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD all in one 9.2 L=450' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 362 Harbor Heights RO PEAK= 16.23 CFS @ 11.99 HRS, VOLUME= .83 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 5.00 80 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 8.9 L=405' s=.03 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 366 GMP PEAK= 10.87 CFS @ 11.98 HRS, VOLUME= 56 AF ACRES CN 3.00 83 Method Comment CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: L=450' s=.03 '/' SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Tc (min 8.8 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 5 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN I Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 Hyr3roC'AD 5.11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems SUBCATCHMENT 368 SE Parking PEAK= 1.19 CFS @ 11.88 HRS, VOLUME= .06 AF IACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD .19 96 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS I Method Comment Tc (min) t CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: .8 L=65' s=.05 '/' I SUBCATCHMENT 369 North Parking PEAK= 2.68 CFS @ 11.88 HRS, VOLUME= .12 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD .45 93 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: .9 L=20' s=.01 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 371 Larkin Center Field PEAK= .92 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= .07 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 1.17 60 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 15.8 L=500' s=.04 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 372 Watershed 1 PEAK= .22 CFS @ 11.98 HRS, VOLUME= .01 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD I .19 60 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 7.1 L=230' s=.057 '/' Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont HydroCAD 5.11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems Page 6 29 Aug 02 SUBCATCHMENT 373 Watershed 2 PEAK= 2.51 CFS @ 11.91 HRS, VOLUME= .10 AF IACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD .58 82 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) I CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 2.6 L=225' s=.125 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 374 Sunset Hotel PEAK= 3.78 CFS @ 11.90 HRS, VOLUME= .17 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD .64 94 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 2.0 L=285' s=.12 '/' SUBCATCHMENT 383 Shearer Parking PEAK= 32.51 CFS @ 11.98 HRS, VOLUME= 1.79 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD 7.00 92 TYPE II 24-HOUR I RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 8.9 L=700' s=.03 SUBCATCHMENT 384 Reyes PEAK= 1.92 CFS @ 12.05 HRS, VOLUME= .13 AF ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD I 2.00 61 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Method Comment Tc (min) CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD Segment ID: 13.0 L=405' s=.04 '/' Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 7 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 I' HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems REACH 303 Reach R Qin = 8.42 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= .59 AF Qout= 7.81 CFS @ 12.21 HRS, VOLUME= .59 AF, ATTEN= 7%, LAG= DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SO -FT) (CFS) 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 .20 1.39 3.23 .40 3.16 10.98 .60 I 5.31 23.15 .86 8.68 46.10 1.20 14.06 89.65 1.60 21.79 163.00 2.00 31.05 263.29 REACH 305 6' x 2' CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE= .21 n= .04 LENGTH= 800 FT SLOPE= .04 FT/FT Reach Q 7.2 MIN STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .32 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 3.2 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 4.2 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Qin = 19.53 CFS @ 14.87 HRS, VOLUME= 12.27 AF Qout= 19.53 CFS @ 14.94 HRS, VOLUME= 12.23 AF, ATTEN= 0%, LAG= 4.1 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (S -FT) (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 .20 1.36 3.20 .40 3.04 10.72 .60 5.04 22.33 .86 8.12 43.86 1.20 12.96 84.04 1.60 19.84 150.70 2.00 28.00 240.75 REACH 307 6' x 2' CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE= .25 n= .04 LENGTH= 600 FT SLOPE= .04 FT/FT Reach P STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .55 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 4.3 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 2.3 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Qin = 8.42 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= .59 AF Qout= 7.88 CFS @ 12.20 HRS, VOLUME= .59 AF, ATTEN= 6%, LAG= DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 .20 1.27 3.09 .40 2.70 9.97 .60 4.27 19.98 .86 6.53 37.47 1.20 9.87 67.97 1.60 14.34 115.33 2.00 19.41 175.79 6' x 2' CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE= .54 n= .04 LENGTH= 800 FT SLOPE= .04 FT/FT 6.7 MIN STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .34 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 3.5 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 3.8 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 8 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems REACH 311 Reach K Qin = 10.47 CFS @ 12.16 HRS, VOLUME= Qout= 10.33 CFS @ 12.22 HRS, VOLUME= DEPTH END AREA DISCH 97 AF 97 AF, ATTEN= 1%, LAG= 3.6 MIN (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 5' x 2' CHANNEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .38 .20 1.11 2.62 n= .04 .40 2.42 8.66 LENGTH= 500 FT .60 3.95 17.76 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT .86 6.25 34.27 1.20 9.79 64.38 1.60 14.74 113.26 2.00 20.53 178.13 REACH 313 Reach M STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .44 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 3.8 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 2.2 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Qin = 11.05 CFS @ 12.17 HRS, VOLUME= .97 AF Qout= 10.92 CFS @ 12.21 HRS, VOLUME= .97 AF, ATTEN= 1%, LAG= 2.7 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SO -FT) (CFS) 5' x 2' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .32 '/' PEAK DEPTH= .44 FT .20 1.13 2.65 n= .04 PEAK VELOCITY= 3.8 FPS .40 2.50 8.83 LENGTH= 350 FT TRAVEL TIME = 1.5 MIN .60 4.13 18.30 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS .86 6.61 35.76 1.20 10.50 68.10 1.60 16.00 121.43 2.00 22.50 193.10 REACH 315 Reach L/N Qin = 10.82 CFS @ 12.18 HRS, VOLUME= Qout= 10.69 CFS @ 12.22 HRS, VOLUME= DEPTH END AREA DISCH 97 AF 97 AF, ATTEN= 1%, LAG= 2.5 MIN (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 5' x 2' CHANNEL II 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .44 .20 1.09 2.60 n= .04 .40 2.36 8.53 LENGTH= 350 FT .60 3.82 17.36 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT .86 5.98 33.18 1.20 9.27 61.63 I 1.60 13.82 107.23 2.00 19.09 167.09 STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= .45 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 3.9 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 1.5 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 9 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems REACH 318 Reach J Qin = 31.98 CFS @ 12.22 HRS, VOLUME= 2.90 AF Qout= 31.52 CFS @ 12.27 HRS, VOLUME= 2.90 AF, ATTEN= 1%, LAG= 3.2 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SO -FT) (CFS) 5' x 2' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .33 '/' PEAK DEPTH= .74 FT .20 1.12 3.02 n= .035 PEAK VELOCITY= 5.8 FPS .40 2.48 10.06 LENGTH= 600 FT TRAVEL TIME = 1.7 MIN .60 4.09 20.80 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS .86 6.54 40.54 1.20 10.36 77.02 1.60 15.76 136.99 2.00 22.12 217.42 REACH 323 Reach I Qin = 57.12 CFS @ 12.28 HRS, VOLUME= 16.09 AF Qout= 56.85 CFS @ 12.30 HRS, VOLUME= 16.07 AF, ATTEN= 0%, LAG= .7 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SO -FT) (CFS) 5' x 2' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .31 /' PEAK DEPTH= 1.08 FT .20 1.13 2.65 n= .04 PEAK VELOCITY= 6.2 FPS .40 2.52 8.87 LENGTH= 150 FT TRAVEL TIME = .4 MIN .60 4.16 18.42 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS I .86 6.69 36.06 1.20 10.65 68.86 1.60 16.26 123.08 I 2.00 22.90 196.14 f REACH 364 IIII Reach G Qin = 19.97 CFS @ 11.99 HRS, VOLUME= 1.44 AF Qout= 15.97 CFS @ 12.17 HRS, VOLUME= 1.43 AF, ATTEN= 20%, LAG= 10.5 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SO -FT) (CFS) 6' x 3.5' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD II 0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .33 /' PEAK DEPTH= .49 FT .35 2.47 8.23 n= .04 PEAK VELOCITY= 4.3 FPS .70 5.68 28.12 LENGTH= 1750 FT TRAVEL TIME = 6.8 MIN 1.05 9.64 59.61 SLOPE= .04 FT/FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS 1.51 15.89 119.54 2.10 25.96 234.26 2.80 40.56 429.08 3.50 58.12 697.12 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 10 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems REACH 382 Reach D Qin = 66.48 CFS @ 12.34 HRS, VOLUME= 18.32 AF Qout= 63.46 CFS @ 12.50 HRS, VOLUME= 18.19 AF, ATTEN= 5%, LAG= 9.2 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 7' x 5' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD 0.00 0.0 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .33 /' PEAK DEPTH= .97 FT .50 4.3 19.16 n= .04 PEAK VELOCITY= 6.6 FPS 1.00 10.0 66.66 LENGTH= 2000 FT TRAVEL TIME = 5.1 MIN I 1.50 17.3 143.63 SLOPE= .047 FT/FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS 2.15 29.1 293.20 3.00 48.3 585.11 4.00 76.5 1089.25 I 5.00 110.8 1791.65 REACH 389 Reach C Qin = 240.8 CFS @ 12.76 HRS, VOLUME= 58.34 AF Qout= 240.6 CFS @ 12.76 HRS, VOLUME= 58.32 AF, ATTEN= 0%, LAG= 5 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SQ FT) (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 .20 1.33 3.04 .40 2.93 10.09 .60 4.80 20.78 .86 7.63 40.31 1.20 12.00 76.11 1.60 18.13 134.56 2.00 25.33 212.49 REACH 3999 6' x 2' CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE= .3 n= .04 LENGTH= 135 FT SLOPE= .037 FT/FT Reach A STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= 2.14 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 8.6 FPS TRAVEL TIME _ .3 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS 2 x FINER ROUTING Qin = 240.5 CFS @ 12.77 HRS, VOLUME= 58.32 AF Qout= 240.1 CFS @ 12.81 HRS, VOLUME= 58.23 AF, ATTEN= 0%, LAG= 2.0 MIN DEPTH END AREA DISCH (FT) (SQ-FT) (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 .20 1.33 2.96 .40 2.93 9.81 .60 4.80 20.21 .86 7.63 39.20 1.20 12.00 74.02 1.60 18.13 130.87 2.00 25.33 206.67 6' x 2' CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE= .3 n= .04 LENGTH= 570 FT SLOPE= .035 FT/FT STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD PEAK DEPTH= 2.18 FT PEAK VELOCITY= 8.4 FPS TRAVEL TIME = 1.1 MIN SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 11 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5 11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 309 Reach 0 Qin = 22.54 CFS @ 12.29 HRS, VOLUME= 12.82 AF Qout= 22.22 CFS @ 12.31 HRS, VOLUME= 12.75 AF, ATTEN= 1%, LAG= 1.6 MIN ELEVATION (FT) AREA (SF) INC.STOR (CF) CUM.STOR (CF) 160.0 1750 0 0 160.5 2010 940 940 161.0 2288 1075 2015 161.5 2584 1218 3233 162.0 2898 1371 4603 162.5 3230 1532 6135 163.0 3580 1703 7838 163.5 3948 1882 9720 164.0 4334 2071 11790 164.5 4738 2268 14058 165.0 5160 2475 16533 STOR-IND METHOD PEAK STORAGE = 4662 CF PEAK ELEVATION= 162.0 FT FLOOD ELEVATION= 165.0 FT START ELEVATION= 160.0 FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Tdet= 4.6 MIN (12.75 AF) # ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES 1 P 161.0' 5.6' x 4.7' CULVERT n=.023 L=95' 5=.021/' Ke=.25 Cc=.9 Cd=.72 POND 320 Baycourt Condos Qin = 8.56 CFS @ 11.99 HRS, VOLUME= Qout= 5.27 CFS @ 12.08 HRS, VOLUME= ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR (FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) 190.0 0 0 0 191.0 324 162 162 192.0 538 431 593 193.0 740 639 1232 194.0 1011 876 2108 195.0 1600 1306 3413 44 AF 44 AF, ATTEN= 38%, LAG= 5.6 MIN STOR-IND METHOD PEAK STORAGE = 2804 CF PEAK ELEVATION= 194.5 FT FLOOD ELEVATION= 195.0 FT START ELEVATION= 190.0 FT SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS Tdet= 13.1 MIN (.44 AF) ## ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES 1 P 191.0' 12" CULVERT n=.01 L=150' 5=.11/' Ke=.875 Cc=.9 Cd=.48 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 12 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5.11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 378 Larkin Pond Qin = 7.51 CFS @ 11.89 HRS, VOLUME= .35 AF Qout= 1.51 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME= .35 AF, ATTEN= 80%, LAG= 7.7 MIN ELEVATION CON.AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR WET.AREA STOR-IND METHOD (FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) (SF) PEAK STORAGE = 5223 CF 156.0 769 0 0 769 PEAK ELEVATION= 159.2 FT 157.0 1273 1010 1010 1285 FLOOD ELEVATION= 160.0 FT 158.0 1855 1555 2565 1884 START ELEVATION= 156.0 FT 159.0 2493 2166 4732 2543 SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS 160.0 3308 2891 7622 3380 Tdet= 37.6 MIN (.35 AF) # ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES 1 P 156.0' 6" CULVERT n=.01 L=20' S=.005'/' Ke=.6 Cc=.9 Cd=.56 POND 381 Reach E and Culvert at Rt 7 Qin = 71.49 CFS @ 12.26 HRS, VOLUME= 18.59 AF Qout= 66.48 CFS @ 12.34 HRS, VOLUME= 18.32 AF, ATTEN= 7%, LAG= 4.7 MIN ELEVATION CON.AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR WET.AREA STOR-IND METHOD (FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) (SF) PEAK STORAGE = 31137 CF 145.0 7813 0 0 7813 PEAK ELEVATION= 148.2 FT 145.7 8573 5733 5733 8605 FLOOD ELEVATION= 152.0 FT 146.4 9369 6278 12011 9435 START ELEVATION= 145.0 FT 147.1 10199 6847 18857 10301 SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS 147.8 11065 7440 26298 11204 Tdet= 14.5 MIN (18.29 AF) 148.5 11966 8059 34357 12143 149.2 12903 8702 43059 13120 149.9 13857 9364 52423 14117 150.6 14882 10057 62479 15184 151.3 15924 10780 73259 16270 152.0 17002 11522 84781 17395 # ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES 1 P 145.5' 481, CULVERT n=.024 L=510' 5=.0291/' Ke=.047 Cc=.9 Cd=.86 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 13 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN I Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5.11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND 390 Reach B (Brigham Road) Qin = 240.6 CFS @ 12.76 HRS, VOLUME= 58.32 AF Qout= 240.5 CFS @ 12.77 HRS, VOLUME= 58.32 AF, ATTEN= 0%, LAG= .6 MIN ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD (FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) PEAK STORAGE = 2999 CF 100.0 I 0 0 0 PEAK ELEVATION= 104.9 FT 100.5 120 30 30 FLOOD ELEVATION= 105.0 FT 101.0 180 75 105 START ELEVATION= 100.0 FT 101.5 240 105 210 SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS 102.0 300 135 345 2 x FINER ROUTING 102.5 360 165 510 Tdet= .1 MIN (58.2 AF) 103.0 420 195 705 103.5 480 225 930 104.0 1000 370 1300 104.5 2000 750 2050 105.0 3000 1250 3300 # ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES 1 P 100.0' 7.67' x 4.33' CULVERT n=.023 L=60' 5=.012'/' Ke=.304 Cc=.9 Cd=.69 Data for BB3 Reach -A 20020829 Page 14 TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.00 IN Prepared by Heindel and Noyes, LLC -- Burlington, Vermont 29 Aug 02 HydroCAD 5.11 001547 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems LINK 100 BB1 Reach-Z and everything above Qout= 196.8 CFS @ 12.82 HRS, VOLUME= 38.23 AF, SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS REACH 1999 from BB1 Reach-Z 20020130 "Reach Z" LINK 200 BB2 Reach-S and everything above Qout= 19.10 CFS @ 14.90 HRS, VOLUME= 11.68 AF, SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS REACH 2999 from bb2 Reach-S 20020130 "Reach S" LINK 9301 Barone 5.2 acres 20020130 Qout= 5.44 CFS @ 12.15 HRS, VOLUME= .53 AF, SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS REACH 99 from L9301 Barone POST 20020131 LINK 9302 Lakeview at Pillsbury (outflow from main p Qout= .42 CFS @ 13.87 HRS, VOLUME= .41 AF, SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS POND 1 from L9302 Lakeview POST 20020829 "Lakeview at Pillsbury Pond A (Lot 10 Micro" LINK 9303 Lakeview at Pillsbury Post I Qout= 3.45 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME= .19 AF, SPAN= 3-23 HRS, dt=.04 HRS SUBCATCHMENT 9 from L9302 Lakeview POST 20020829 "Lakeview at Pillsbury Post I" UMBRELLA PERMIT 4CO526 (INFORMATION FROM ACT 250 FILES) ISSUED 10/12/82 TO L.T.H. ASSOCIATES REVISED 7/20/03 Page 1 of 2 += Not Part of Original Umbrella Permit * = Information from Pinkham Enizineers Permit # Lot # Parking Wastewater Average Daily Traffic Total Applied Available Total Applied Available Total Applied Commercial Approved Approved Approved A.DN T.E 4CO526 160 lots 999 320 679 33,000 Res 33,000 10,000 1,000 Res 1,000 0 Residential Residential 10,000 Comm & Comm No Umbrella Allocation on 43,000 Commercial 4CO526-1 (1A) 1 23 656 50 9,950 55 Portland Glass 4CO526-2 3 15 641 225 9,750 20 Westinghouse 4C0526- 3 (3A) 4 + 5 33 608 780 8,970 73 Wallman -Shelburne Plastics 4CO526-4 (81139) 11 55 +209 399 40,000 — 2,100 Howard Johnson's Motel existing 4C0526- 4F (81139) 11 56 343 3,174 — 100 — 250 seat ballroom 4C0526- 5 (81139) 9 void — — — — — — Office Building 4C0526- 6 2 34 309 13,898 — 200 — Car Wash 4C0526- 7 (81139) 7 + 8 26 283 7,235 — 161 — Community Care 4C0526- 8 (96194) 6 29 254 5,064 — 103 Allenwood - Phase 11 4CO526-9 (70 units) N.A. Ex. 56 + 5,744.5 — 155 * — Harbor Sunset (98165) Min 12 4C0526-10 (60 units) 11 46 + 5,540 — 132 * — Staybridge Suites (97118) UMBRELLA PERMIT 4CO526 ISSUED 10/12/82 TO L.T.H. ASSOCIATES (INFORMATION FROM ACT 250 FILES) REVISED 7/20/03 Page 2 of 2 * = Information from Pinkham Engineers Permit # Lot # Parking Wastewater Average Daily Traffic 4CO526-11 (00127) Lakeview at Pillsbury 10 116 138 11,640 317 00127: allocations7-21-03 Rachel E. Hochman Michael R. Oulette Todd Drolette 503 Bay Crest Drive 504 Bay Crest Drive 505 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Tom J. Mcgettrick Adrienne Raye Newton Sean Whipkey 506 Bay Crest Drive 507 Bay Crest Drive 508 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Margie C. Aka Goetze Godsey James & Abigail Longtin Penny Dawn Hester 601 Bay Crest Drive 603 Bay Crest Drive 604 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Leszek & Danuta Boudzy Matthew Dal] Francis J. LaPointe 605 Bay Crest Drive 606 Bay Crest Drive 607 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 City of South Burlington Karen F. Leonard Matthew Bombard 575 Dorset Street 103 Bay Crest Drive 104 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 John A. Russell Monica Marie Brynn Ricky S. Ferris 105 Bay Crest Drive 106 Bay Crest Drive 107 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Douglas S. Isham Vermont Housing Finance Agency Sylvia Lapointe 109 Bay Crest Drive 110 Bay Crest Drive 1 I 1 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 John Madden Eberhard Klaehne Robert Laclair, Jr. 112 Bay Crest Drive 136 Bay Crest Drive 170 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Gardner Construction, Inc. Rocque et al Robert & Janice Mckay 188 Bay Crest Drive 201 Bay Crest Drive 203 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Fred & Marlene Hodgdon John A. & Lynn Russell Thomas Connelly 204 Bay Crest Drive 205 Bay Crest Drive 206 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Susan A. Victory Christine Johnson Neal C. Erickson 207 Bay Crest Drive 231 Bay Crest Drive 287 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elliot D. Tokat Martin L. Leibowitz Martin & Anne Marie Resnik 301 Bay Crest Drive 305 Bay Crest Drive 307 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Jennifer A. Pasha Michael J. & Lauren S. Mathon Thomas & Francine Mackin 308 Bay Crest Drive 309 Bay Crest Drive 310 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Heather Mckenny Darko & Aida Sedic Saric Tarrant Hoehl Larkin 312 Bay Crest Drive 402 Bay Crest Drive 403 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert Quirion Kathy A. Ryan. Scott & Betty Carik 404 Bay Crest Drive 405 Bay Crest Drive 406 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Katelin G. Paczabut Joseph S. Conners Terese Maslack & Patrick B. Ayer 407 Bay Crest Drive 408 Bay Crest Drive 501 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Terrence J. Martin TAB Realty David Allyn Heleba 502 Bay Crest Drive Shelburne Plastics 701 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 PO Box 234 South Burlington, VT 05403 Shelburne, VT 05482 Amy D. Roth Robert J. Desautels, Jr. Peter D. Kilburn 702 Harbor View Road 703 Harbor View Road 704 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Christopher M. Heath Cherie L. Bigelow Rebecca A. Larkin 801 Harbor View Road 802 Harbor View Road 803 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Nancy E. Morse Michael G. Curran Andrew Farrington 804 Harbor View Road 805 Harbor View Road 901 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Bernadette & Henry Laperle, Jr. Judith 1. Oprendek MaryLou Messier 902 Harbor View Road 903 Harbor View Road 904 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 George M. & Una S. Connelly 905 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Rex E. Blumeyer 908 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Angela Ann Duquette 1003 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Kevin J. & Sarah K. Treadway 1006 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Jeffrey P. & Kelley A. Trombley 1103 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Mark J. Waters 1202 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Amy J. Eroh 1206 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 David H. Johnson 102 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Rene E. Herrick 906 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Julie Taylor 1001 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Iris Shasha 1004 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Cathy A. Meilleur 1101 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Karen Nielsen 1104 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Clifford Z. & Bertha L. Lacourse 1203 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Allen Road Land Company, Inc. 100 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Jason E. Kinsey 907 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Josephine M. Szymanski 1002 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Janet Oun 1005 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Raymond A. & Hilda Hendrickson 1102 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Lewis B. Greitzer 1201 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05401 Eva Davant 1205 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Kayothia L. Frost 101 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 STATE OF VERMONT ;w AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION - �'t` 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633 V .r. March 19, 1992 Ms. Lucinda E. Gibson Resource Systems Group, Inc. Post Office Box 1104 Norwich, Vermont 05055 Re: Shelburne, US 7 Larkin Realty/Howard Johnsons Dear Ms. Gibson: We have completed a review of your traffic study for the Howard Johnson's Ballroom project and offer the following. Our analysis of your traffic figures indicates that a south - bound exclusive left -turn lane is warranted at the US 7/Harbor View Road intersection, either with or without the proposed Ballroom. Since our upcoming highway project will be rectifying the situation with the construction of a full -intersection with turning lanes and jughandles, we will not require the developer to construct a turn- ing lane at this time. It should be noted, however, that after construction of the --- - project, the existing direct access to US 7 will only serve north- bound right turning traffic which could easily use the new north- bound jughandle. We feel it would make sense to eliminate the - direct access to US 7 as part of our project. If you have any questions, please call me at 828-2653. Sincerely, 1 PJSTRICT COMMISSION P, Donald L. Allen APPLICATION A y(`05:)-(p - H F project Supervisor EXHIBIT Utilities Section MAR 2 3 1992 DATE; DLA:mw cc: Louis Borie, District Environmental_ Coordinator Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. 03/31112003 11; 23 5022951OP' RESOURCE SYSTEMS 61"' PAGE 02/OS RESOURCE I SYSTEMS GROUP INCORPOHATGD MEMORANDUM To; William Nedde From: Dipti Borlmr-Demi Subject Bartlett Lot 10 Elderly Houen* Development Traffic E tudy Date: 31 14farch 2003 T11is ntemotanduxn responds to questions raised by District 4 Coc rdinator, Peter F. Keibcl in 17is 4 November 2002 lettex to you regarding our traffic sr.Ay for Barrie It Lot 10 Qune 2002). The two queries are addressed as follows' 1. Pleme evaluate in more detail the need for a. separate left urn lane on the Harbor Viev, Drive approach to Shelbume Road, V'e implemented a. separate left tarsi. lade on die Harbor View; Drive approach to Shelburne. Road and conducted the lezrel-o£-service J-0,S) for the Shelburne R gad/Harbor Viev, Drive: intersection. Table 1 shows the level-of-sen ice analysis results for the inter section before and after the addition of the separat-e left turn lane on Harbor View Drive. %bee 1. PIN Peak Hour Level -Of -Service Resutfs for the •Sholbame RoNuih, orbor view Drive liatersue#faR Intortootion Scenario Shared 1-0 &Right Turn Onto Shelburne Road Exc alive Left & Right Turn Onto Shelburne Road WS WS Shared Left -Right Leif LOS Delay LOS Delay Shelburne Rd! 2008 No•Bund F BD C 20 Harbor Vlevi Rd 2003 Build F 61 D 20 (unr ignelirbd) 2008 ND -Bulb F AM, E Si 2008 Build F >100" E 39 As shown above, the LOS signiftcazdy improves in the 2003 ix) -build and build scenarios %ith the addition of = exclusive left turn lane on Harbor View Drive. 1.1kough the LOS is an E ix., 2005 no - build and build scenarios, it has improved wi.6 the implement ition of the exclusive left turn, lane. 2. It is un.cleas from the Traffic Impact Report;, whether the Elaxbor Avenue/Shelburne Road intersection is Currently signalized and if the signa nation .as would Happen after the Shelburne Road reconstruction project) is nece9sarj for this ptopc=i project to have acceptable LOS. 331 Qrcott Driv e, Whfte River i4mrtion, Vermcint 05001 TELS02.295.4993 t F'ax802.29F,,1,006 • www,rsginc_cam 03/31. /'2003 11: 23 802 29510Pr RESOURCE SYSTEMS GP— l PAGE 03/03 Bartlett Lot 10 sldarly housing Development TraffIt Study March 2003 Resource Systems Group, Inc,. page 2 TEE Skxelbu,rnt Roadjdatbor View Drive intersection is i u.trently unsignali:eed. Table 2 shows the level -of -service results for this intersection before aw after signal#.; atxon. Table 2: PM Peak Hour Level-Ot-Servlae Results for the Shelburne lioaW 'arbor View Wvo bttergeatfon Inters Ion scenario WB Sofore Sign lization WB After SI anlizdtion Shelburne Rd/ 2003 No-Buffd F so C 34 Harbor View Nd 2003 Bulld F 61 G 35 2008No-Build F 3-too" C 32 200$-Build F >100" I C 32 Ab seen above, the LDS si0ficantly improves after the signer i7ation of the Shelbutne Road/Harbor View Thrive intersection. 7be LOS is at an F for all the no -build and build scenarios before the signahzation of the Shelburne F oad/Harbor View, Dzive inter >ectiot, It is correct to conclude that signalization is necessary for acczprable LOS_ Please let me know% if yoga vtould like us to subxrx t this direcd , to Peter. Kc bel, of if you have any further questions. I r State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation .Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800.253-0191 TOD>Voice 1-000-253-0195 Voice>TDD June 12, 2003 Mr. Ken Kaliski Resource Systems Group, Inc. 331 Olcott Drive White River Jct., VT 05001 Subject: John Larkin Development Dear Mr. Kaliski: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation ,i Air Pollution Control Division .)UN r :a: t ; Bldg. 3 South, 103 South Main Street I ' ; Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0402 Tel.: (802) 241-3840 Fax: (80.2) 241-2590 http:itwww.anr.state.vt.us/dec/air/ The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Enviro imental Conservation, Air Pollution Control Division ("Agency') is in receipt of your letter dated June 9, 2002 regarding the John Larkin Development, including the Bartlett Subdivision properties, in Sou h Burlington. The Agency concurs that an Indirect Source Air Pollution Control Permit is not required as A Ir. Larkin has never owned at any one time or intended to own developments aggregating to 1000 motor vehicle parking space or more. Please feel free to contact me at (802) 241-3845 if I can be of any further assistance or if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. Sincerely, Douglas R. Elliott, Environmental Analyst Air Pollution Control Division (douoe(5bdec anr.state.vt.us) DE:de Al — South Burlington Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/SF -ingfield/St. Johnsbury State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voioe>TDD AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Public Water System Permit to Construct PROJECT # E-1367 WSID #5091 PIN #EJ02-0236 PERMITTEE ADDRESS: PROJECT NAME: TOWN LOCATION John Larkin, Inc. John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Lakeview at Pillsbury South Burlington, VT General WATER SUPPLY DIVISION The Old Pantry Building 103 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05671-0403 TELEPHONE (802) 241-3400 FACSIMILE (802) 241-3284 December 19, 2002 The referenced plamiing documents are approved in accordance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 56, provided that all conditions listed below are complied with and continually satisfied. This Constriction Permit, with conditions, is granted based on a review which determined that the proposed works, if built in accordance with the approved planning documents, will conform with adopted design standards and will not constitute a public health hazard or a public health risk. The review and approval did not, however, include the structural engineering aspects of this project. Project Description The project is represented by plans and specifications prepared and submitted by Krebs & Lansing, Consulting Engineers. The project involves an extension of South Burlington Water System's existing 8-inch water main on an access road off of Harbor View Drive. The extension will be made with approximately 230 linear feet (If) of 8-inch Ductile Iron pipe, two hydrant assemblies, and fire suppression sprinkler systems with required backflow prevention. The extension will serve a 113 unit elderly housing building with a design average day water demand of 13,095 gallons per day (70 units x 1.5 person/bedroom x 75 gpd/person plus 43 units x 1 personibedroom x 75 gpd/person plus 15 employees x 15 gpd/employee less a 10% reduction in design demand due to the installation of low flow fixtures). Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Permit to Construct Lakeview at Pillsbury Page 2 December 19, 2002 The project is presented in the following: Sheet No. Drawing Date T- --Last Revision Date 1 Aril 16, 2002 T August 6, 2002 D-1, D-4 Aril 16, 2002 Ju�yl2002 D-2, D-5 April 16, 2002 October 15, 2002 Aril 16, 2002 July 17, 2002 D-3 The total number of sheets reviewed by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation for this project is six. Project Conditions (1) All construction on this project must be completed by and the permit shall expire on December 31, 2004 unless written approval is obtained from the Department of Environmental Conservation which extends the expiration date. (2) This Constniction Permit is notltransferable or assignable and shall automatically become invalid upon a change of ownership or upon suspension or revocation. A successor in interest to the permittee may apply to the Department of Environmental Conservation for reissuance of this permit. 9 (3) By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the project, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental laws and this permit. (4) The Department of Environmental Conservation maintains continuing jurisdiction during the life of the permit and may require the permittee periodically to file an affidavit certifying that the project is operating in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and conditions of the permit. (5) The project shall be constructed, completed, maintained, and operated in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the Department of Environmental Conservation. Permit to Construct Lakeview at Pillsbury Page 3 December 19, 2002 (6) Construction inspection shall be performed by a competent inspector under the general supervision of a professional engineer. It is the permittee's responsibility to ensure that inspection is undertaken to assure that the project is constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, plus any authorized change orders. (7) The permittee or representative shall submit as -built Record Drawings to the Department of Environmental Conservation indicating the system as it was constructed, including any field modification. Record Drawings shall be developed by the professional engineering firm responsible for observation of construction. Record Drawings shall be submitted within 60 days of final system field approval by the responsible -engineer. (8) Prior to being placed in operation for domestic use, all new portions of the system shall be flushed, pressure tested, disinfected and flushed again. Following this procedure, at least two samples must be collected (in Vermont Department of Health sample bottles) from representative sample points and sent to the Vermont Department of Health Laboratory at 195 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT 05401 (or any other Vermont Department of Health certified laboratory) for Bacteriological Examination of Public Water Supply and indicate on the form that it is for a new system awaiting approval. Negative sample results are required before the system may be placed "on line" for potable water use. Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Christopher Recchia, Commissioner Jay L. Rutherford, Director Water Supply Division Dated at Waterbury, VT this 19th day of December, 2002. RIP:GB:mo c South Burlington Water Department South Burlington Fire Department Krebs & Lansing, Consulting Engineer Ernest Christianson, Regional Engineer, DEC Greg Bostock, WSD/DEC, Regional Manager Director, Environmental Health Division PID #E-1367 353-1500.02 - I 1 F State of Vermont z� Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD January 3, 2003 Bill Nedde Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.. 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, Vermont 05446 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 South Main Street Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 802-241-3770 Fax #:802-241-3287 RE: Lakeview at Pillsbury, South Burlington, Wetlands Project #2002-378 Dear Bill: Thank you for showing me the above captioned project site this fall. I am writing to send you our Act 250 comments for this project with respect to wetlands. As you know, we normally recommend that wetlands with significant functions and values be protected with a 50-foot buffer zone. We would recommend the 50-foot buffer zone for this project since the wetland is adjacent to an impaired water. The buffer zone helps maintain the water quality of the wetland, and the stream. In the case of this project, I understand that you are not able to meet the 50-foot recommendation in the vicinity of the parking lot. If the plan cannot be revised, perhaps you can propose some type of mitigationfor the proposed buffer impact. Plantings in the portions of the buffer zone that are currently mowed, the establishment of a "no mow" zone, and the installation of a split rail fence at the edge of the buffer zone are ideas that should be considered. I also understand that the plan has been designed so that no untreated stormwater will be directed to the wetland. This would be recommended as well. Finally, we would like to know how snow will be managed on the site. We recommend that any snow, with accompanying dirt and salt, not be pushed into the buffer zone of the wetland. Thank you for contacting us in advance of submitting your Act 250 application. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, April J. Moulaert, PWS District Wetlands Ecologist cc: Peter Keibel, Act 250 Coordinator Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation William H. Nedde III Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 0544b Re: Lakeview at Pillsbury Dear Mr. Nedde: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES _—'- DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 1�1 G103 South Main Street, 10 South Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0501 Tel.: (802) 241-3700 Nongame & Natural Heriittage P ogram 31 October 2002 Everett Marshall asked that I respond to your letter regarding the above -reference site. I am also responding on behalf of District Wildlife Biologist John Austin regarding critical wildlife habitat. I have reviewed the information you provided and consulted with other Agency of Natural Resources staff. From conversations with April Moulaert and Kim Greenwood, I understand that further revisions of your site plan will provide better assurance of maintaining water quality. The Department of Fish and Wildlife is also interested in ensuring water quality, in part because of the rare Mottled sculpin downstream. I understand that all disturbance will be moved to outside of 50-foot stream and wetland buffers, and that the buffer will be either allowed to reestablish or will be revegetated with appropriate native species and allowed to persist unmaintained. The buffer boundary should be clearly marked (such as with a fence) to avoid accidental encroachment. I also understand that the perched culvert situation will be rectified. Because of the small size of the stream at that point and the wetland on the other end of the culvert, it is unlikely the Mottled sculpin will need to pass through this culvert. For passage of other aquatic organisms and the stability of the stream, however, we would like to see this problem resolved with proper engineering. I have enclosed a list of resources provided by a colleague that may be of some assistance in designing the culvert to acceptable standards for wildlife passage. I'm personally not familiar with the engineering or specific biological requirements. The above revisions will sufficiently satisfy our Department's concerns regarding potential impacts to rare, threatened and endangered species, significant natural communities, and critical wildlife habitat. Thank you for the opportunity to review your plans. I trust the recommendations of Ms. Moulaert and Ms. Greenwood will be followed to ensure protection of water quality, wetland function and stream integrity. Let me know if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Jodi Shippee Fish & Wildlife Technician Tel: 802-241-4230 Email: jodi@fwd.anr.state.vt.us cc: John Austin, District Wildlife Biologist; Everett Marshall, Biologist/Data Manager Equal Opportunity Employer Raninnal nffirac - RgrrP/F-gzPy .Int /Pittafnrri/Snrinnfialrl/Rf .Inhnshiiry Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife State Wildlife Lab Roxbury, Vermont 05669 (802) 485- 7566 / FAX (802) 485-8515 TO: Culvert Committee FROM: Rich Kim DATE: January 22, 2002 SUBJECT: Stream crosssing guidelines: Information sources Several of you have sent me sources of information on stream crossings. So far this is what I have compiled: Web Sources: www.na.fs.fed-us/spfo/pubs/stewardship/accessroads/stream.htm (landowner's guide - USFS) Washington DFW -- Fish Passage Technical Assistance Page http://www.wa.gov/wdfw/hab/engineer/habeng.htm Contains links to publications on design guidance and standards, barrier assessment and prioritization techniques, research programs, Washington State DOT hydraulic manual, and fish passage hydrologic information for Washington. www.wa.gov/wdfw/hab/engineer/research.htm (fish passage research page - WA state) w\,vw.wa.gov/wdfw/hab/engineer/ei-n/culvertm. WA state) htm (design manual for culverts - TranSafety, Inc. Road Engineering Journal www.usroads.com/joumals/p/rej/9711/re971102 htm FishXing. USDA Forest Service, etc. www.stream.fs.fed-us/fishxing/index.htmi National Marine Fisheries Service: Final NMFS SW Stream Crossing Guidelines http://swr.ucsd.edu/hcd/NMFSSCG.PDF) Southwest Region Habitat Conservation Division http://swr.Licsd.edu/habitat.htm California Department of Fish and Game Native Anadromous Fish and Watershed Branch Page littp://www.ci fg.ca.gov/nafwrb/index.html Link to CDFG Salmonid Stream'Habitat Restoration Manual. Manual includes typicals of different culvert baffles and jump pool weirs and other instream structures. Oregon Road/Stream Crossing Restoration Guide, Spring 1999 (with ODFW criteria) http•//www.nwr.noaa.gov/ 1 salmon/salmesa/4ddocs/orfishps.htm British Columbia Fish Passage at Culverts Guidebook http://www for gov bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/fpc/fpcguide/stream/str-toc.htm British Columbia: Fish and Fish Habitat Inventory in the Skeena Region littp://www.elp.gov.bc.ca/ske/fshinv/ The purpose of this page is to provide contractors, FRBC Funding Recipients & other interested parties with easy access to tools and information pertaining to fish inventory activities within the Region & Province. USDA Forest Service Water -Road Interaction Technology Series Documents littp://w,,vw.stream.fs.fed.Lis/water-road/index.html Grade Control Task Committee - US Army Corps Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory http•//chl wes army.mil/research/hydstruc/gradecontrol/task/ Draft review of existing literature on grade control structures. Other: Fish Passage Through Culverts. 1990. U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Department of Transportation. FishXing (interactive CDROM) USFS, etc. Fish Passage Through Culverts, An annotated bibliography. 1999. USDA Forest Service, Technology and Development Program. (avail through FishXing sources listed above). e Photo Location Plan L aA-e pie w a t Pillsbury 0' 200' 600' 1200' 2000' Bar Sc a/e 1 " = 400' November 3, 2003 10-2002.dwg DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZOIffNG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERIV ONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 ,July 17, 2003 John P. Larkin 410 Shelburne Road S. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Lakeview at Pillsbury, Harbor View Road, Approval Extension Dear Mr. Larkin: Please be advised that the South Burlington Development Review Board at their meeting held on July 15, 2003 granted your request for a one () year extension to the expiration date for the above referenced project. The approval for this project will now expire on 8W04 unless a zoning permit is issued for construction of the project. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely,•' Al � �V/' „f Raymorfd J. Belair Administrative Officer cI LARKIN REALTY 410 Shelburne Road, Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 864-7444 (802) 864-0649 Fax July 15, 2003 City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT 05403 To: Director of Planning and Zoning From: John Larkin Re: Lot 10 , Lakeview at Pillsbury, Harborview Road Dear Julie Beth, We would like to request an extension to our Zoning approval for the above project, which will expire on August 6th. We are still in the review process with Act 250 and will not be able to begin construction in the time alloted by our current approval. Please call with any questions. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Qt4-, P -P�� John P. Larkin KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc, February 3, 2003 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Lakeview at Pillsbury - Lot 10 Harbor View Road, South Burlington 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 Dear Ray:^ Please find enclosed a detailed stormwater analysis for the above referenced project/!' The site is generally bounded on the north by the north branch of Bartlett Brook and on the south by the south branch of Bartlett Brook and Harbor View Road. The west side of the property abuts the existing parking lot for Harbor View Hotel and the Howard Johnson Hotel. The east side of the property abuts the existing development, Harbor Heights Condominiums. The lot is currently vacant with a paved access drive running through it. The lot is 7.03 acres with 4.5 acres being a flat, open meadow bordered by steep, wooded side slopes running down to Bartlett Brook. The site soils area Hna Hinesburg Type C. The project will consist of a 113 unit elderly housing project. Parking is provided in an underground parking garage and some exterior parking. Access will be from the exiting paved access road off Harbor View Road and the existing parking lot. The pre -development condition was divided into two wastersheds corresponding with the natural stormwater discharge points of the property. Study point 1 "Out AA" is located where the south branch of Bartlett Brook leaves the lot; Study point 2 "Out BB" is located where the north branch of Bartlett Brook leaves the lot located to the east. The proposed development has been designed to capture stormwater from all impervious surfaces and direct it to two proposed extended detention ponds. An elaborate network of swales, catch basins, and piping will serve to convey runoff from the developed areas to the extended detention ponds for treatment. These ponds will also serve to limit post development peak runoff levels to below the pre -development conditions. Page Two Ray Belair February 3, 2003 The following is a brief summary of the measures taken in an attempt to comply with various aspects of the new treatment standards. Please see the attached spreadsheets and plans for additional information. Water Quality Treatment Standard (WOTS or Wqv): The Water Quality Treatment Standard has been met by the proposed detention basins to a Micropool Extended Detention Pond. This pond provides adequate Water Quality Volume Storage via a forebay, permanent micropool, and extended detention. Please see the attached spreadsheets and tables for water quality calculations. Channel Protection Treatment Standard (Cpv): The Channel Protections Treatment Standard has been met by using the Micropool Extended Detention Pond to detain the Channel Protection Volume draining to Bartlett Brook. The Micropool Extended Detention Pond was sized using the methods outlined in the Vermont Stormwater Treatment Standards, Section 1.3 "Cpv storage volume calculation". This volume is provided in addition to and independently of the Water Quality Volume. Groundwater Recharge Treatment Standard (Rev): The Groundwater Recharge Treatment Standard is met for this project by draining impervious areas into grassed swales. Overbank Flood Protection Standard: The Overbank Floor Protection Standard has been met by using the Micropool Extended Detention Pond to limit the post development peak discharge rate to the pre -development peak discharge rate for the 10 year, 24 hour storm event. The pre -development peak discharge rate is 6.52 cfs, while the post development peak discharge rate is 5.03 cfs. The attached calculations show the curve numbers, time of concentrations, and pond routing measures used to achieve these results. Extreme Flood Protection Standard: The Extreme Flood Protection Standard is waived because the total impervious area proposed for the development is less than 10 acres (1.75 acres impervious are existing and proposed). Page Three Ray Belair February 3, 2003 Please review the proposed stormwater management design at your earliest convenience and contact us with any questions to comments you may have. We appreciate your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, f: William H. Nedde III, P.E. 5703 WHN/sml Enclosure cc: John Larkin Deb Sherman W 127:letter to my Wlair D E.I➢ARTIbIY+.l' T OF PLANNING & L0NING 575 DORSET STREET SOUI'I I BURLINGI'ON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 22, 2005 John 11. Larkin 410 Shelburne Load 5. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Lakeview at Fillobury, Harbor View Road, Approval Extension Dear Mr. Larkin: please be advised that the South Burlington Development Review Board at their meeting held on January 21, 2003 granted your requeet for a six (6) month extension to the expiration date for the above referenced project. The approval for this project will now expire on 816103 unless a zoning permit io issued for construction of the project. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, M' i a mond J. Belair Administrative Officer LARKIN REALTY 410 Shelburne Road, Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 864-7444 (802) 864-0649 Fax January 14, 2003 Development Review Board Attention Ray Belair 575 Dorset St So. Burlingotn VT 05403 Re: Lakeview at Pillsbury, Harbor View Road Dear Review Board, We would like to request a six month extension on our approval of the above project, application # SP-02-28 and #CU-02-16. The Decision and Conditions are dated August 6, 2002. Thank you and please call with any questions. Si erely John arkin State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Public Water System Permit to Construct PROJECT # E-1367 WSID #5091 PIN #EJ02-0236 PERMITTEE: ADDRESS: PROJECT NAME: TOWN LOCATION John Larkin, Inc. John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Lakeview at Pillsbury South Burlington, VT General WATER SUPPLY DIVISION The Old Pantry Building 103 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05671-0403 TELEPHONE (802) 241-3400 FACSIMILE (802) 241-3284 December 19, 2002 The referenced planning documents are approved in accordance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 56, provided that all conditions listed belo'A" are complied with and continually satisfied. This Construction Permit, with conditions, is granted based on a review which determined that the proposed works, if built in accordance with the approved planning documents, will conform with adopted design standards and will not constitute a public health hazard or a public health risk. The review and approval did not, however, include the structural engineering aspects of this project. Project Description The project is represented by plans and specifications prepared and submitted by Krebs & Lansing, Consulting Engineers. The project involves an extension of South Burlington Water System's existing 8-inch water main on an access road off of Harbor View Drive. The extension will be made with approximately 230 linear feet (10 of 8-inch Ductile Iron pipe, two hydrant assemblies, and fire suppression sprinkler systems with required backflow prevention. The extension will serve a 113 unit elderly housing building with a design average day water demand of 13,095 gallons per day (70 units x 1.5 person/bedroom x 75 gpd/person plus 43 units x 1 person/bedroom x 75 gpd/person plus 15 employees x 15 gpd/employee less a 10% reduction in design demand due to the installation of low flow fixtures). Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Permit to Construct Lakeview at Pillsbury Page 2 December 19, 2002 The project is presented in the following: Sheet No. Drawing Date Last Revision Date 1 April 16, 2002 August 6, 2002 D-1, D-4 April 16, 2002 July 18, 2002 D-2, D-5 April 16, 2002 October 15, 2002 D-3 April 16, 2002 July 17, 2002 =1 The total number of sheets reviewed by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation for this project is six. Project Conditions (1) All construction on this project must be completed by and the permit shall expire on December 31, 2004 unless written approval is obtained from the Department of Environmental Conservation which extends the expiration date. (2) This Construction Permit is not transferable or assignable and shall automatically become invalid upon a change of ownership or upon suspension or revocation. A successor in interest to the permittee may apply to the Department of Environmental Conservation for reissuance of this permit. (3) By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the project, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental laws and this permit. (4) The Department of Environmental Conservation maintains continuing jurisdiction during the life of the permit and may require the permittee periodically to file an affidavit certifying that the project is operating in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and conditions of the permit. (5) The project shall be constructed, completed, maintained, and operated in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the Department of Environmental Conservation. c Permit to Construct Lakeview at Pillsbury Page 3 December 19, 2002 (6) Construction inspection shall be performed by a competent inspector under the general supervision of a professional engineer. It is the permittee's responsibility to ensure that inspection is undertaken to assure that the project is constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, plus any authorized change orders. (7) The permittee or representative shall submit as -built Record Drawings to the Department of Environmental Conservation indicating the system as it was constructed, including any field modification. Record Drawings shall be developed by the professional engineering firm resnnnsihle for observation of construction. Record Drawings shall be submitted within 60 days of final system field approval by the responsible engineer. (8) Prior to being placed in operation for domestic use, all new portions of the system shall be flushed, pressure tested, disinfected and flushed again. Following this procedure, at least two samples must be collected (in Vermont Department of Health sample bottles) from representative sample points and sent to the Vermont Department of Health Laboratory at 195 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT 05401 (or any other Vermont Department of Health certified laboratory) for Bacteriological Examination of Public Water Supply and indicate on the form that it is for a new system awaiting approval. Negative sample results are required before the system may be placed "on line" for potable water use. Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Christopher Recchia, Commissioner Y v `' Jay L. Rutherford, Director Water Supply Division Dated at Waterbury, VT this 19th day of December, 2002. RIP:GB:mo c South Burlington Water Department South Burlington Fire Department Krebs & Lansing, Consulting Engineer Ernest Christianson, Regional Engineer, DEC Greg Bostock, WSD/DEC, Regional Manager Director, Environmental Health Division PID #E-1367 353-1500.02 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 JULY 2002 PAGE 2 Ms. Quimby moved to approve site plan application #SP-20-32 of Pizzagalli Properties subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 16 July 2002. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 4-0 with Mr. Bolton abstaining. 4. Continued site plan application #SP-02-28 of John P. Larkin to construct a 113 unit congregate housing facility in one building, 25 Harbor View Road, and S. Public Hearing: Application #CU-02-16 of John Larkin, Inc., for rnnrlitinnMl wc- uupp� aivai iii�U jCCilOn 21i.U5, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 113 unit congregate housing facility, 25 Harbor View Road: Mr. Belair noted they have added landscaping. They have also found and delineated some wetlands. Some parking spaces have been designed for future development, if needed. Ms. Dufresne referred to pictures of what the building will look like. Mr. Nedde said they had met with the Fire Chief. As a result, hydrants have been added. There was also a request for access to the northwest wing. Some pavement has been added so a ladder truck can now access that area. The building will be fully sprinklered. Mr. Nedde also noted that a wetlands consultant has visited the site. The project does not impact the wetland but does impact the wetland buffer. Because the wetland will remain in its existing condition, its function will remain unchanged. Stormwater will be directed to a detention facility and will not enter the wetland. The stormwater design has been finished and submitted to Heindel and Noyes for review. The details of the water system have also been modified to comply with regulations. Mr. Belair noted that the Natural Resources Committee does not want to see parking in the wetland buffer. Mr. Boucher stressed that the Commission tries to be consistent about encroachment into the 50 ft. wetland buffer. Mr. Cameron felt the logical discussion should be whether to allow them to build anything there at all. Ms. Budd asked the height of the building. Ms. Dufresne said it will be 70.75 feet above the average pre -construction grade. Mr. Cameron said he was not OK with the red roof. He felt the building was very attractive, but the roof was not in context with other colors. Ms. Dufresne said the dormers will break up the roofline. Mr. Belair noted that Act 250 will get involved with color. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 JULY 2002 PAGE 3 Mr. Belair noted that at the previous hearing, landscaping was 50% short. They have added landscaping but are still $9150 short. Since some large trees are being saved, staff is not opposed to a waiver for that amount. Ms. Roth expressed concern with screening and with the ability of other residences to see the view. Ms. Dufresne showed what will be there and that it will not block the view. Mr. Cameron noted that Natural Resources recommends no parking at all in the wetland buffer, Mr_ RPI?ir cairn thcy FKeel tom- -----' ",�Y icci ���C ���inn155i�n is "nickel and diming" the wetlands. Mr. Nedde noted the Ordinance allows an impact but not a significant impact. Mr. Boucher suggested adding spaces in other areas and there then would not be an impact. Ms. Quimby noted there would still be 116 parking spaces without the ones in the buffer and that is still double the number required. A poll of members showed that a majority did not want parking in the buffer but would allow encroachment for truck turning. Ms. Quimby asked for confirmation of the chiller pad location which was provided. Ms. Quimby moved to approve site plan application #SP-02-28 and conditional use application #CIU-02-16 of John Larkin subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 16 July 2002 amended as follows: Stipulation 2c shall read: "The site plan shall be revised to comply with the recommendations from the Natural Resources Committee to remove 15 parking spaces that encroach into the wetland buffer. Stipulation #9 shall read: Pursuant to Section 3.503 of the zoning regulations, the Board approves limited encroachment into the C.O. District/wetland buffer for truck turn- around..." Mr. Cameron seconded the motion which was then passed unanimously. 6. Sketch plan application #SD-02-42 of Precourt Investment Co. to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of two buildings of 9800 sq. ft. and 3800 sq. ft. which consist of: 1) 3500 sq. ft. of fast food, 2) 2400 sq. ft. of personal service (Electric Beach and Clay's Barber), 3) 1800 sq. ft. of restaurant use (Chicken Charlie's), 4) 2700 sq. ft. vacant, and 5) 2700 sq. ft. of retail use. The amendment consists of a request for the following additional uses: 1) general office, 2) medical office, 3) retail use, 4) personal service, and 5) convenience store, 6) bakery/deli restaurant, 7) department/discount st-3res, 8) fast food restaurant, 1160-1174 Williston Road: Mr. Precourt said they are looking for an umbrella approval. He noted 2500 sq. ft. is now vacant and they are looking for something other than food uses. There would be no change to the site or to buildings. He reviewed the current uses and noted most of them have been there a long time. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 4 JUNE 2002 PAGE 2 4. Site plan application #SP-02-28 of John P. Larkin to construct a 113 unit congregate care facility in one building, Harbor View Road: Ms. Dufresne showed the location behind Holiday Express and adjacent to Pillsbury South. She noted that congregate housing is a conditional use in this district. The design of the proposed building is based on a 1920's resort hotel with white siding and a red roof. There will be a usable deck with a porch below. The building will incorporate some underground parking. The applicant is asking for a heiaht waiver and the nlan meet`' f-k- 'a'a'}'^^ }� r .... , u'uuiuvI ia! se b ICJ required for the waiver. This will allow for more green space. Building coverage is at 7% with the allowable being 30%. Overall coverage is 26.30/0 with the allowable being 70%. Mr. Dinklage asked about the impact of this building on existing Harbor View buildings. Ms. Dufresne said the building will be up against a lot of mature trees which will minimize the impact. Ms. Quimby expressed concern with fire protection and noted the difficulty of getting a ladder truck to the back. The ladder can only get to 2 stories and asked what will happen to people on the additional 4 stories. Mr. Belair noted the building will be sprinklered. Ms. Quimby said that would help contain a fire but not put it out. Mr. Nedde said the Fire Chief asked for a few more hydrants and indicated they will continue to work with him on fire protection issues. Mr. Belair pointed out that 34 parking spaces are required and the applicant is proposing 131. Mr. Nedde said they are finding that people are more mobile than anticipated in this housing facilities and that there are more cars than anticipated. Parking is tight at some of the other similar facilities. Mr. Cameron suggested reserving space for future parking, if needed, and not building all of it now. Mr. Kupferman asked about the possibility of a light on Harbor View Rd. Mr. Nedde said this is part of the Shelburne Rd. project. Mr. Belair said staff hasn't yet gotten the report from Heindel & Noyes regarding the Bartlett Brook Watershed impact. Mr. Nedde said ghat in a few weeks there will be a new permit process from the state under new laws. He said he was comfortable that their design will meet the requirements. They are willing to wait for more information. Mr. Belair said staff can make a final assessment of this. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 4 JUNE 2002 PAGE 3 Mr. Belair also noted that a conditional use permit is required and the applicant hasn't yet submitted an application for this. Landscaping is also more than 50% short. Staff recommends adding an additional $47,000 in landscaping. Mr. Kupferman asked about drainage which appears to go from a detention pond to the next property. Mr. Nedde explained how the drainage system works and noted the same owner owns the adjacent property. He said they will be in compliance with the most recent state requirements. Mr. Boucher -,aid he +niantarl ro coo the ele�.ati^n� FrOn. Shelburne , � IC�UU� �C Road just ue see what it will look like from Shelburne, Allen and Harbor View Roads. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to confirm that what is shown in the submitted materials is substantially how the building will look. Ms. Dufresne said it is, though they may possibly reverse some of the one and two bedroom units. Mr. Belair suggested continuing the hearing to allow the applicant to address the issues raised. He noted a decision must be made within 60 days from tonight and recommended continuing until 16 July. Ms. Quimby moved to continue the application until 16 July. Mr. Cameron seconded. Motion passed unanimously. S. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-02-33 of Jeff Nick, J.L. Davis Realty to amend a previously approved subdivision consisting of: 1) a 3.6 acre lot (lot C), and 2) a 15.7 acre lot (lot B). The amendment consists of minor boundary line adjustments that will result in: 1) lot C increasing in size from 3.6 acres to 5.8 acres, and 2) reducing the size of lot 8 from 15.7 acres to 13.5 acres, 1275 Airport Parkway: Mr. Nick noted that there has to be a slight adjustment to the CO District on the plan. Mr. Belair explained there is a small wetland on the plan and the CO District/Open Space boundary should be shown. He indicated the location on the plan. No other issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat application #SD-02-33 of Jeff Nick subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 4 June 2002. Mr. Cameron seconded. Motion Passed unanimously. AGENCY OF NATUP " RESOURCES (ANR) AND ENVIRONMF' 'qL BOARD (ACT 250) PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOTAL # DEC PERMITS PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW RESPONSE DATE PENDING APPLICATION #_ L3-9-I -)y L DISTRICT 4 or 9_ TOWN OWNER OF PROJECT /SITE: NAME: -JOLLI G. i9 !c i �✓; ��l% ADDRESS: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: NAME:Ay1/SiA//.- ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE: Project Name: L-,���// Lv 4-7- Z_ S Based on a written or oral request and/or information provided by. LU/"-i,4ko �'��� „?C- received on // i , a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of %.03 acres, located on le A--J! The project is generally described as: Lp.v 5 i T�2��Tz o,✓ a` � � ii 3 vv� � �����.1 f ��r%r/C� Prior Permits From This Office: PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION [ I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coordinator or Assistant District Coordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. St1s_'hN/' A-'( -/-3/0,9 Permit Specialist,OtherPersen e) 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LAN DOWNER/AGE,,NTT,, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)). l Commercial, residential or municipal project? Has the landowner subdivided before? When/where/# of lots AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: YES NO-, Co ies sent to Statutory Parties: YES ><' NO BASIS FOR DE ISION: n �rP ��r .� � l�v �'� R 3y a��• SIGNATURE: DATE: OZ. ADDRESS: Environmental Commissions Districts #4, 6 & 9 istrict Coordinator Telephone: 8W 87 -5614 111 West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 �? WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED 3� YES NO Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Deferral language required in deed Floor Drains to a UIC well REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: Ernest Christianson (879-5675), Jessanne Wyman (879-5673), William Zabiloski (879-5672) Dolores LaRiviere (879-2341) SI NATURE.���;�?'� l ��� �� DATE: // /i�ADDRESS: Agency of Natural Resources Environmental Assistance Division, Permit Specialist, 802 879-5676 Dept. of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division, Telephone: 802 879-5656 111 West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 OVER»»»»» d THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON-BlN_.NG DETERMINATION REGARDING OThcR PERMITS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact: _ Discharge Permit; pretreatment permits; industrial, municipal Indirect Discharge Permits Residuals Management 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888 520-4879) Contact: _ Construction/modification of source Open Burning _ Wood Chip Burners (>90 HP) Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation Industrial Process Air Emissions _Diesel Engines (>450 bHP) . / SJ WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) (800 823-6500 in Contact: �� �-% GcJJ i.� `�j Z:j2 (/ New Hydrants >500' of waterline construction Community Water System (CWS) Bottled Water Transient Non -Community water system (TNC) Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water systems (NTNC) ATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Contact: _u�jl����Jl.r1��z- River Management (241-3770) Stormwater Permits (state and federal ) (241-4320) Shoreland encroachment (241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) Wetlands (241-3770) 674 a 5� Section 401 Water Quality Certificate (241-3770) Stream Alteration (751-0129/879-5631/786-5906) Water Withdrawal (241-3770) 7. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Notification of Regulated Waste Activity (241-3888) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) Waste oil burning (241-3888) Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Composting Facilities (241-3444) Used septic system components/stone 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) State funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) SMALL BUSINESS AND MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) Stream Obstruction Approval Contact: Contact: Judy Mirro or John Daly 802 241-3745 EPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office 879-2300 Contact: Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) Storage of flammable liquids, explosives LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers Boilers and pressure vessels 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors Program for asbestos control & lead certification (Phil Cornock) Children's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: Child care facilities (1-800 649-2642) Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities Nursing Homes (241-2345) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) ? Junkyards (828-2053) Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) Railroad crossings (828-2710) Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) Construction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800 675-9873) Contact: Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) Milk processing facilities (828-2433) Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-2421) Golf courses (828-2431) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) 1 VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 VT Building Energy Standards 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) Historic buildings Archeological sites 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines) 1. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise tax/solid waste 22 LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael St -Suite 205, Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 872-2893 24. OTHER: `Sections #3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist Susan Haitsma Date: I may be reached at 879-5676 on WEDS and FRI, or at 476-0195 on MON and THURS, or at 751-0127 on TUES Copies have been mailed to: REVISED 9/20/02 Train i A�; t,State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURALRESOURCES , - Department of Environmentalonserva ion Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Department of Fish and Wildlife _ Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Essex Junction, VT 05452 Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: (802) 879-5656 November 25, 2002 John Larkin, Inc. 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington VT 05403 Subject WW-4-1742 Lakeview at Pillsbury Lot 10 proposed 113 room elderly housing with 70 one bedroom ; units & 43 �wc --a bedroom units 15 employees municipal water & sewer 13,095 gpd 7.03A. located on Harbor View Road in South Burlington Ladies & Gentlemen: We have received your application and fee paid by check 4 on November 22, 2002, which begins the 45 day in-house performance standards for our review. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 in-house days, please contact this office. We have forwarded your application to the Information Specialist, who will send you a Project Review Sheet indicating other state departments you should contact about additional permits you may need. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. or the Division of Wastewater Management ene . o _e DEC Regional Office Coord cc: South Burlington Planning Commission William H. Nedde, III i w% State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation November 6, 2002 John Larkin, Inc. 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Larkin: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-5656 Subject: Application for permit for Lot # 10, proposed 113 room elderly housing, municipal water & sewer. located off Harbor View Road, South Burlington, Vermont. We have reviewed the application materials and have completed the "application completeness checklist." Unfortunately, we were unable to log your application in because it was administratively incomplete with the missing or incomplete information in the application materials. Enclosed are copies of the application form you submitted, as well as -the "application completeness checklist" with the missing or incomplete items noted and the check submitted for the fee. If you have questions or are unsure what is needed to complete the application package, please contact me. We will hold your application materials. Once you have the missing or incomplete information, please send the materials to this office along with the enclosed copies. Once we have determined that the application materials are complete, the application will be accepted and will be assigned to one of the engineers to be reviewed. Sir rely, Irene L. Roberge DEC Regional Office Coordinator Enclosure -copy of application form and checklist copies: South Burlington Krebs & Lansing C�kc_ AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATION COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Landowner. Town: Checklist es:' "✓" = item submitted; "O" = item missing; "NA item not applicable Application form 2. Design flow t '-3. Appropriate fee S6' 4. Signed check # '7 5.Power of attorney (letter of assignment) ,,�' 6. Book,P I � and Page 3 C. 4`�7. Town . Road name 9. Project description 10. Water quality test 11. Municipal sewer approval Municipal water approval ,4i14. -Property access signature 5. Location map W6.Two coppies of legi�leplans, includin lines with dimensions, scale properly an title box (title, date, sheet #f) //17. All applicable signatures including % consultant stamp/signature on plans. 18. Prior permits (list numbers) 19. Compliance with other permits (list of prior permits) 20. Date of construction and uses of any existing buildings involved with the project. 21. Other 13. Easements for off -lot system, 9 3,� Description of Project Application incomplete for the following items: 701 3. 4. — completed by Appcheck.doc - Application Log -in checklist form - April 9, 2002 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION (For Office Use Only) Permit# PIN Comp Appl Rec'd Fee Rec'd $ Check # APPLICATION FOR WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT Pursuant to Chapter 1, Subchapter 4 of the Environmental Protection Rules PART I Please print clearly or type your responses. A. LANDOWNER NAME John Larkin Inc. Please list the name(s) ass own on the deed. ljmultiple landowners, p ease provi e a separate s eet isting each landowner, marling address and signature. MAILING ADDRESS 410 Shelburne Road Please provide the complete address, including street or P. 0. box or rural route number. South Burlin ton VT 05403 864-7444 Town or city State Zip code Phone number B. CO -APPLICANT NAME Please list the names oJ the co -applicant i appropriate. co -applicant willreceive copies o all correspondence regarding the application an permit. MAILING ADDRESS Please provide the complete address, including street or P. 0. box or rural route number. Town or city State Zip code one number CONTACT PERSON: William H. Nedde III If this application is being submitted y a business, ease the organization, in case we have questions or need more C. CONSULTANT NAME: William H. Nedde, III us the name of a contact person within nation. Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 164 Main Street Suite 201 Please provide the complete address, including street or P.O. box or rural route number. Colchester Vermont 05446 802-878-0375 Town or city State Zip code Phone D. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Does this project involve a failed water or wastewater system? Yes No X 2. Location of project: Enclose a portion of a United States Geological Survey (USGS) Map, town highway map, or accurate site location map showing the project location. 3. Town South Burlington Road Harbor View Road 4. Business Name 5. When was lot created? 1982 If the lot was created after 9118169, please provide the permit number under section DI 1. or provide an explanation for why the lot was exempt from subdivision regulations. 4CO526 6. Size of lot: 7.03 acres Please identify the lot(s) by number or letter. Please indicate the size of the lot in acres or square Jeet.— Please indicate the size of all contiguous tracts of land owned by the above landowner. Lot 410 Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal application form - June 29, 2001 1 7. Book 219 Page 360 Property Tax Map No. 0 /60-00025 Please sped t e book a w ere the deed or this property is recorded in the city or town land records. This information is not required, but would be helpful in tracking projects. 8. Detailed Project Description: Please describe the proposed use ofthe building, including number of seats (ifa restaurant), number ofliving units and bedrooms (f residential), number of employees. Ifa conversion of a building is proposed, please provide prior uses as well as proposed use (use an attached sheet if needed) The applicant and landowner are proposing to construct a 113 room elderly housing project on a 7.03 acre parcel located off Route 7 and Harbor View Road, South Burlington. 9. Will or does the building have any floor drains? Yes No X If so, please show the floor drains on the plans and speci t e use o t e area w ere they are located, and where the drains discharge. 10. If the project involves an existing building, was this building constructed before 6/1/70? Yes No . If the buildingwas built after 6/1/70, please be sure to specify the permit number in —prior permits section of the applcation form. N.A. 11 Prior permit.— Af'OC14 Please list all previous permatsissue on the same tract oJ land, such as Land Use Permit, Fu ac Building Permit, Subdivision Permit, Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit, Certificate of Compliance, Deferral of Permit, Home Business Certification, Remediation Certification or Act 250 Permits. 12. Description of water supply system: Please check all that apppply. a. drilled well (bedrock or gravel well), shallow welUspring (less than 30' deep), or surface water name oJ reservoir, lake or raver b. individual water supply system or share water supply system public non -community transient or public non -community non- transient water lots buildings Please provide umber of lots/buildings served by the water supply system. c. X public community or municipal water supply system Water Supply Identification # 5091 name South Burlington Please include a letter from the owner o the water system, or municipality authorizing the connection to the system, and allocation o the water. d. an existing water supply system, or a proposed water supply system. 1.3. Description of wastewater disposal system: a. soil -based wastewater disposal system; on -site, or off -site b. connection to a non -municipal commune isposal system. c. �— connection to municippal system d._ connection to IndirectDischarge System Note: If 13 b, c, or d is checked, please include the name of the municipality or owner and a letter from the person authorized by the municipality or community wastewater disposal system entity approving the connection and allocation of sewage. Name of system City of South Burlington Water .Supply and Wastewater Disposal application form - June 29, 2001 14. Basis of desi n flows for( eject: If the design ows for the project are from more than one type of use, please provide a breakdown of the design flows; such as number of bedrooms per unit, number of employees, number of seats in restaurant, etc. If you are utilizing a 10% reduction in water or wastewater flows for low flow fixtures, you must state that. If you are utilizing a 20% reduction in wastewater flows for municipal sewer service, you must state that also. Breakdown of design flows: 70 Units x I bedroom/unit x 1.5 people/bedroom x 75 gpd/person = 7,875 43 Units x 2 bedrooms/unit x 1 person/bedroom x 75 gpd/person = 6,450 15 Employees x 15 gpd/employee = 225 14,550 10% credit /water saving devices = - 1,455 Requested Water Allocation 13,095 gpd Number of gallons of water required per day: Please refer to the Water Supply Rule - Chapter 21, Appendix A, Table S, Unitized Averagge Day Flows Existing flows: 0 Increase in flow: 13,095` "Total Design Flows - Water: _13 %5 _ Number of gallons of sewage generated per peak da�yy Please refer to the Environmental Protection Rules, napter 1, Small Scale Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Rules, effective August 8, 1996, Appendix 1-7A, Flow Quantities.. Existing flows: 0 Increase in flow: _11,640` Total Design Flows -Sewage: _11,640 _ 1 G F_acomont Tnfnrmatinn - Wtba ivntor V11nn1V nr 1unrt01A1nt0V dionnan7 --t- /;ti 1„ ;-- .t.,..., a✓• a1 1- IIµ , u Ii uy v, II L.LJL Iv Lti/ µLJ7'-, Jy JLt. ttL �Lt Ll.LµµLt L"Ity YV"er-1 Vt JI:VVL1 lines' is located on land owned by others, or crosses land owned by others, please submit a letter from the landowner stating that they will provide an easement to the applicant. Please submit a copy of the signed easement agreement. N.A. 16. Is any portion of the property in or near a wetlands, or is there a wet area on the property? X No Wetlands, and sometimes a buffer around the wetland, are protected by federal an owe laws. GFhere known and applicable, please show wetlands on the site plans. Contact the wetlands program at (8021NI -3770 for further information. E. Application fee: $ 5 499.90 A fee of $0.42 per gallon of design flow is required There is a minimum ee o 115.00 per application. The fee is based on the design flow for water or wastewater, whichever is higher. An amendment fee of $60.00 is appropriate for previously approved projects with requiring no technical review and no increase in demands on the water or wastewater systems. Please make the check payable to STATE OF VERMONT. Municipalities are exempt from fee requirements unless the application is for a new public water supply. For new public non -community transient or public non -community non -transient water sources, please include an additional fee of : ($250.00 +( $0.005 x design flow)). F. SIGNATURES/ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1. In order to insure compliance with the requirements of the regulations administered by the Department of Environmental conservation, it may be necessary to visit the property subject to this application. If we do visit your property, clo you have any special instructions? 2. As landowner of the property for which I am requesting a permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation, I understand that by signing this application I am granting permission for Department employees to enter the property, during normal working hours, to insure compliance of the property with the applicable rules of the Department. 3. I understand that I am not allowed to commence any site work or construction on this project without written approval from the Depa nt of Environmental Conservation. John P. Larkin < Z- Land owner(s) ame (printed) --Signature ate (as shown on Deed) an owners ame printe Signature Date (as shown on Deed) If there is more than one landowner, and there is not room to fit the information on this form, please provide an additional sheet with the names, mailing addresses, signatures and dates. If an attorney signs for the landowner(s), please submit a copy of the aui lorization document that grants the Power of Attorney specific to land transactions. Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal application form - June 29, 2001 C- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING lily � l 4 . 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 12, 2002 Mr. William H. Nedde III Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 RE: Wastewater Allocation, Lake View at Pillsbury Dear Bill, This letter will serve as an allocation of 11,640 gallons per day of municipal wastewater capacity for the Lakeview at Pillsbury project. Treatment will occur at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment plant. The fee for the capacity will be $53,544. The allocation will become final upon payment of this capacity fee. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, y� uli Beth Hoover, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning cc: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer File KREBS & USING Consulting Engineers, Inc. August 7, 2002 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Lake View at Pillsbury Dear Ray, 164 Mcin Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 We have recently received approval from the City of South Burlington for Lakeview at Pillsbury. We are proceeding to Act 250 and we are requesting a water/sewer allocation request and a completed municipal impact questionnaire. Our estimated water usage was calculated as follows: 70 Units x 1 bedroom/unit x 1.5 people/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 43 Units x 2 bedrooms/unit x l person/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 15 Employees x 15 gpd/employee 10% credit /water saving devices Requested Water Allocation Our estimated sewer requirements are as follows: 70 Units x 1 bedroom/unit x 1.5 people/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 43 Units x 2 bedrooms/unit x l person/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 15 Employees x 15 gpd/employee 20% credit Requested Sewer Allocation Please call if you have any questions or comments. WHN/dcw cc: Deb Sherman John Larkin Michelle Dufresne 7,875 6,450 = 225 14,550 - 1,455 13,095 gpd 7,875 6,450 225 14,550 - 2.910 11,640 gpd Sincerely, v _ice fig( w- William H. Nedde III 00127:6elair allocations ACT 250 MUNICIPAL IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE This questionnaire is intended to help applicants gather evidence to submit under Criterion 7 - Municipal Services. A letter or narrative from the Town Manager, Selectboard Chair or appropriate official may also serve as evidence. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE: Applicant Name: John P. Larkin, Inc. Municipality: City of South Burlington Title and Date of Site Plan Submitted: A 016 C 7, TOWN MANAGER, DEPARTMENT HEADS, OR EQUIVALENT TO COMPLETE: a) Does the municipality have the capacity to provide the following services without unreasonable burdens for the above project: Fire Protection Police Protection Rescue Service Solid Waste Disposal Road Maintenance ,Yes _No Yes No _Yes No Yes No $-Yes _No _ Mun. does not provide this service. Mun. does not provide this service. Mun. does not provide this service. Mun. does not provide this service. Mun. does not provide this service. b) If "no", what are the deficiencies? J c) If the service is unavailable from the municipality, who provides the service so that the town doesn't have to?r�`�(�,i,l �> - t N (Yl - d) Would the deficiencies occur without this project? Yes or No? If "no", what measures can the applicant take to alleviate the deficiencies? /\J Z A_ e) If the deficiencies are common to many projects, does this project create burdens which are disproportionate to the taxes and user fees to be paid to the municipality? _Yes or _No? If "yes", does the municipality recommend the imposition of an impact fee or other means to mitigate any unreasonable burdens? J'�ZIA z f) Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? Yes or _No ! certify that the above information is,Jrup pn)d accyrate to the best of my knowledge. Position Date 1 KREBS & IANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street August 7, 2002 Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Ray Belair Fax (802) 878-9618 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Lake View at Pillsbury Dear Ray, We have recently received approval from the City of South Burlington for Lakeview at Pillsbury. We are proceeding to Act 250 and we are requesting a water/sewer allocation request and a completed municipal impact questionnaire. Our estimated water usage was calculated as follows: 70 Units x 1 bedroom/unit x 1.5 people/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 43 Units x 2 bedrooms/unit x l person/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 15 Employees x 15 gpd/employee 1-0% credit /water saving devices Requested Water Allocation Our estimated sewer requirements'are as follows: 70 Units x 1 bedroom/unit x 1.5 people/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 43 Units x 2 bedrooms/unit x l person/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 15 Employees x 15 gpd/employee 20% credit Requested Sewer Allocation Please call if you have any questions or comments. WHN/dcw cc: Deb Sherman John Larkin Michelle Dufresne 7,875 6,450 225 14,550 _ - 1,455 13,095 gpd Sincerely, ex- WU William H. Nedde III 7,875 6,450 225 14,550 - 2.910 11,640 gpd 00127belair allocations R� ACT 250 MUNICIPAL IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE This questionnaire is intended to help applicants gather evidence to submit under Criterion 7 - Municipal Services. A letter or narrative from the Town Manager, Selectboard Chair or appropriate official may also serve as evidence. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE: Applicant Name: John P. Larkin, Inc. Municipality: Cily of South Burlington Title and Date of Site Plan Submitted: " ; �a�, �; s 9, o 2- TOWN MANAGER, DEPARTMENT HEADS, OR EQUIVALENT TO COMPLETE: a) Does the municipality have the capacity to provide the following services without unreasonable burdens for the above project: Fire Protection j�Yes No Mun. does not provide this service. Police Protection ,j�Yes No Mun. does not provide this service. Rescue Service _Yes _No Mun. does not provide this service. Solid Waste Disposal Mun. does not provide this service. _Yes Road Maintenance $ Yes _No _No _ Mun. does not provide this service. b) If "no", what are the deficiencies? A c) If the service is unavailable from the municipality, who provides the service so that the town doesn't have to? 'oP_ - (A \i w L(L� lj is-t. C hdt V�1 "w ,i cl I;I )01-,L T i E-E-o f d) Would the deficiencies occur without this project? _Yes or No? If "no", what measures can the applicant take to alleviate the deficiencies? /V� e) If the deficiencies are common to many projects, does this project create burdens which are disproportionate to the taxes and user fees to be paid to the municipality? _Yes or _No? If "yes", does the municipality recommend the imposition of an impact fee or other means to mitigate any unreasonable burdens? /U� f) Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? Yes or _No I certify that the above information is/;rup pind apcyrate to the best of my knowledge. b Position Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 11COUL. V \-�. 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 12, 2002 Mr. William H. Nedde III Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 RE: Wastewater Allocation, Lake View at Pillsbury Dear Bill, This letter will serve as an allocation of 11,640 gallons per day of municipal wastewater capacity for the Lakeview at Pillsbury project. Treatment will occur at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment plant. The fee for the capacity will be $53,544. The allocation will become final upon payment of this capacity fee. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, uli Beth Hoover, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning cc: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer File KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street August 7, 2002 Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Ray Belair Fax (802) 878-9618 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Lake View at Pillsbury Dear Ray, We have recently received approval from the City of South Burlington for Lakeview at Pillsbury. We are proceeding to Act 250 and we are requesting a water/sewer allocation request and a completed municipal impact questionnaire. Our estimated water usage was calculated as follows: 70 Units x 1 bedroom/unit x 1.5 people/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 43 Units x 2 bedrooms/unit x l person/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 15 Employees x 15 gpd/employee 10% credit /water saving devices Requested Water Allocation Our estimated sewer requirements are as follows: 70 Units x 1 bedroom/unit x 1.5 people/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 43 Units x 2 bedrooms/unit x l person/bedroom x 75 gpd/person 15 Employees x 15 gpd/employee 20% credit Requested Sewer Allocation Please call if you have any questions or comments. WHN/dcw cc: Deb Sherman John Larkin Michelle Dufresne 7,875 6,450 — 225 14,550 _ - 1,455 13,095 gpd = 7,875 = 6,450 225 14,550 — - 2.910 11,640 gpd Sincerely, VX- V U WE I William H. Nedde III 00127te4tir allocations CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 12 August 2002 Bill Nedde Krebs and Lansing 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Site plan and conditional use applications, #SP-02-28 and #CU-02-16, of John Larkin Inc., 25 Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Nedde: Please find enclosed the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board approval on July 16, 2002, in regards to the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement to obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months, or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner s s. r *e �r n � s T x t »a � a o w� `�..�� '.. .F �•+ .,'fit';. W 4= ' 1 P 4 No :: :: r:: :: :: :::::F r :: :II: �10118 IllilliEllil 1 INNOVATIVE DESIGN INC. Lakeview @ Pillsbury $0 Kimbell Ave,6WLa 707 So. BuAlnOmn , V! 0640J 900 So. Burlington, Vermont , I•���6s mNuOes®so Bernet No Text wmn rrwpaa r nia iunnwro. as well as all other ap- I"rses will oe arroraeo ir:uu x.m. ar me: Call full opportunity to submit 802 658-8113 Ou antiq goody le labor laws bids nP response to this Verrr �Iement of ( ) ome antiques/coile err tabor and truck redeinvitation and will not be Agrici, / ;ies. All must go. aveb bathe en pState discriminated against on Food at. Ga xeLs ter mined y the grounds of race, co- Dairy Section Office > BtJRLINGTON, Sat. Transportation Board and lor. religion, sex, or na- 116 State Street ?9 Rain or Shine. 9- are set out in the Bid tional ongin in considera- Drawer 20 Montpelier m. No Early Birds Proposal. Contractors tion for an award. The Vermont05620.2901 Free Press >asel 10 Charles St. bidding on this project right is reserved to reject Classifieds t Patchen Rd.! White must be qualified in ac• any or all kids, to waive V�riIlan testimony will be 658.3321 I Small fridge, electric cordance with the Agen- any formality and any accepted anytime up un- FOUND SABLE FERRET ove, portable dish- cy Regulations. The and ail technicalities in til August 5, 2002. Probably been living j isher, dehumidifier, Vermont Agency of bids and to accept such under my porch for three P dslmattresses/ensem Transportation hereby bid as may be deemed !n une29,2002 weeks. Beautiful animal, j �s, TV's, lamps, table notifies all bidders that it the best inter e — —� deg friendly. Obviously a d Chairs, dishes, will affirmative) insure TOWN OF thes bike, two man y awardin y. pet, misses its parents. that in any contract en- UNDERHILL Call (802) 654-7596 _ iak, and much more. tered into pursuant to une 26 & 29, 2002 Z KING BOARD OF 1 BURLINOTON Sat- this advertisement, PUBLIC NEARING JADJUSTMENT FOUND, tacklebox, along n 9-5. Huge two farm- nority business enter- SOUTH BURLINGTON HEARINGS the Milton Lake Cham- plain shore.. identify at lawn sale. Lots of prises will be afforded DEVELOPMENT useholds, from furni- full Opportunity to submit REVIEW BOARD I 'e UofdAdostmen�nlwill g (802)862-9855. e to miac., and some bids in response to thls�_ held public Adjustment on *FOUND daues. Corner of Wil- invitation and will not be 0 Wallet found atWalmart ton Road and Shun- discriminated against on The South Burlington Monday, July 15 and on6@0 C60-29all to denttfy. e, Look for signs. the grounds of race, co- Development R e v i e w July 22, n H l the Un- (802} 660-2953. l BURLIHGTON Three tor, religion, sax or na- Board will hold a public derhill Town Hall with the ** k LOST CAT *fir nily Sale! Sat. 6129, lion origin in considera- hearing at the South Bur- folio'ningagendas: Black/orange female, ca- m-2Pm. Household ton for an award. The lingloo- City Hall, Confer- July 15: The request of lico, extra toes, Missing rns, videos, albums, right is reserved to .reject once Room, 575 Dorset David Edson, 15 Chads since 6/26, Severance tires w/alloy rims, any or all bids, to wawa 3Veet, South Budington, Road for a conditional Rd area, Colchester. Call thes&more. any formality and any Vermont on 7uesda use for an accessory (802)268.9328. 380 White SL and all technicalities in Jul 16. 2002. at 7:o0 apartment, The property LOST CAT, Short haired bids and to accept such P.M. to consider the fol- P —` CS015 is located in the gray female cat with T ALBANSt 2 Family bid as may be deemed in lowing: Mt. Mansfield Scenic small white spot on loving Sale! 47 Bank the best interest of the I i c a t i o n Preservation District. chest, small build. No I., off Main St. down- awarding agency. # - P P The request comes und- collar. Call (802) 859- )Wn,SaL6l29ONLY! # Larkin, Inc.0l John i- q Larkin, Infor condi- er Chapter VIIIB-1 of the 0875. w.. June 26, & 29, 2002 tional use approval under Underhill Zoning Regula- RGENNES Moving after Section 26.05, Condi- tions. The hearing will be yrs, Everything goes. AGENCY OF tonal Uses, of the South at 7:30 PM, LOST CAT Small fe- aat deals -Digital came- TRANSPORTATION Burlington Zoning Regu- male, white, orange tripod, sewing ma- MONTPELIER lations. Request is for The request Of Peter and black. Lost in ne, veggimals. Set. & INVITATION FOR permission to Construct Cxaja, 86 Deane Road to South Burlington on 16129-6/30,9.4. BIDS a 413 unit congregate expand a non -complying 6120, Call Jeri 2027 Maple St exten- housing facility, 25 Har- structure and for a van- (802)658-8136 sion. 2.5 miles south of Sealed bids, on forms bor View Road. ance for streambank de - Vergennes furnished by the State, 2 A p p e a I # A 0- velopment. The property YyESTBOLTON will be received until 02-04 of Highlands De- (DE086) is located in the * -�# MOVING SALE!3536 11:00 a.m. "prevailing velopment Co., LLC of Mt. Mansfield Scenic LOST DOG Black and 1 Nashville Rd.6/28,6129, time on Friday, July 12, Notice of Violation #NV- Preservation District, white, neutered male I 6/30.9-5:30pm. Clothes, 2002 at the Office of 02-14 which alleges land The request comes und- Siberian H u s ity . new&used items. So- Contract Administration, development without a er Chapter III N-1 and V Answers to Tundra. mething for everyone! Room 219, North Lobby, zoning permit in an area of the Underhill Zoning Eyes 1 blue, I brown. May be seen weekdayys National Life Building, located off Park Road Regulations. The site yr Lost on 6117 in North- byappt..(802)434-3178 Montpelier, VT for the north of 196 Park Road sit will be at 6:30 tot- Fairfax area. Call No reasonable offer constructionof the pro- and east of 234 Park lowed by a hearing at (802) 849-9923 with refused. lect' hereinafter des- Road. TOOp.m. any into. STFORD Sat. only, 9- cribed. The time of re- 3 . A p p e a I # A 0 Yamaha keyboard, ceiving and opening bids 02.06 of, JAM Golf, LLG July 22: The request of f clubs, housewares. may be postponed due of notice of Violation Martin & Betty Danaher, LOST DOG: Jack #NV-02-18 which alleges Russell Terrier, Milton•Westford Rd, to emergencies or unto the use and occupancy 20 Russin Drive, for a answers to "Harley" thRdinKingsHill. reseenconditions. conditional use for an of a club house, swim- accessory apartment *REWARD $500 LLISTON- CRAFTERS! LOCATION: Statewide ming pool and tennis and to construct a pond. Lost in Colchester bber stamps, papers, STP CRAK (16): This courts without a Certifi- The property (RU020) is area Sat. 6, 15. 5 yrs. ,ons, much morel By work is to be performed cate of Occupancy/CO• located in the Soil & We- old. Brown & white ointment. mpliance and having ter Conservation and the colored with brown Call (802) 872-0017. in the northeastern regi constructed parking lots, m u s h r o o m -shape d on of the State on the access drives and in- Rural Residential est LLISTON 2nd Annual following Routes; US 5 stalled landscaping cont- t r i c t s . The request Please o call o (802) b862- Ighborhood Garage St. Johnsbury MM 1.320 nary to approved plans at comes under Chapter IX } h at "The Commons to St, Johnsbury MM 1227 Dorset Street. de and on of the Un- 4969. !,/Sun., 6/29-30, 9- 2.622; US 5 Bradford 4. A p p e a I # A 0-derhill Zoning Regula- n. Don't miss this MM 3.307 to Newbury 02-04 of Homestead De- Rain or Shine. Look MM 1.488; US 5 Barton sin Inc. of Notice of signs outside village. MM 0.000 to Barton MM V 90 I a t i o n # N V -02 =15 LLISTON, SUNDAY 3.883; US 5 Irasburg which alleges land deve- LY! 2246 Governor MM 0.327 to Coventry lopment without a zoning-- henden Rd, right off Mtt 0.769; US 302 Berlin permit in an area locate uth Williston Rd. MM 0.000 to Berlin MM off Park Road north of 1 'iques, tools, morel 1.895; VT 12 Northfield 196 Park Road and east Res��/ y8ungmustgo! MM 0.00 to Northfield of 234 Park Road ■ MM 3.060; VT 12 North- 5. A p p i i c a t i o n f 10pSKS a nri and Sat, field MM 4.200 to North- #CU-02-15 of Joe Handy `� ��; �� %����� 3 ' field MM 5.266; VT 14 seeking conditional use ri/shine. Quality baby ns, infant clothing, Barre Town MM 2,319 to approval under Section a��,`\\ vclem ®%I ins i ; household, East Montpelier MM 26.05, Conditional Uses, Roc e! 120 Bellevue St. 0.114; VT 14 Greensboro of the South Burlington sartybirds. MM 0.000 to Albany MM Zoning Regulations. f00SKl small kitchen 6.722; VT 15 Hardwick Request o for Fermis- MM ; VT to Walden MM sq. to construct a 100- ,fiances, household. 4.095; VT 58 Lowell MM sq. ft. addition to a con- rs sporting equip., & 0.000 to Irasburg MM venience store with gas of neat stuff. Sat, 9- 3:218; VT 100 Westfield sales, 1333 Williston 2Dufresne Dr. MM 4,686 to Newport Road Copies of the app' -- - --— lions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Din Burl Chairman .r South Burlington Deve- lopment Review Board. — a-icI aaa3 i ur �zng aq L • • June 29, 2002 a) Ability to carry of store adequate flood waters; b) water quality by virtue of erosion or run-off; c) The use and enjoyment of adjacent properties; d) Wetland function and values; e) Wildlife and fisheries habitat. 3) Site plan application #SP-02-2$ of John F. Larkin to construct a 113 unit congregate care facility in one building, Harbor View Road. This project is to construct a 113 unit congregate care facility on undeveloped land. This project located on Harbor View Road lies within the Commercial 1 and Bartlett Brook Overlay Districts. It is bounded on the east by condominium developments (Harbor Heights and Bay Court) and the Residential 4 Zoning District, on the south by Harbor View Road, and on the west by commercial hotel development. Parking: The parking requirement is 34 parking spaces. The plan shows 131 parking spaces 92 exterior spaces and 39 underground, including four (4) accessible spaces and 2 accessible van spaces. A bike rack is shown on the site plan. *C. O. District/Wetland Buffer: The applicant is proposing parking within the C.O. District/Wetland buffer. The applicant should be prepared to address Section 3.401 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. b) No building of any kind, including any structure of construction such as parking lots... shall be permitted within this district. Section 3.50 states the encroachment of a nonconforming use or activity into a CO District is permitted under certain circumstances subject to approval by the Development Review Board. Section 3.503 Encroachment in a CO District which is located along a drainage way or which encompasses a wetland and associated buffer area will not significantly affect adversely the attributes provided in (a)-(e) below. Appropriate mitigation may be required to assure that the following attributes will not be affected adversely: a) Ability to carry of store adequate flood waters; b) water quality by virtue of erosion or run-off; c) The use and enjoyment of adjacent properties; d) Wetland function and values; e) Wildlife and fisheries habitat. 575 Dorset Street Phone: 846-4106 Fax: 846-4101 Fax To: Bill Nedde From: Stephanie A. Smith Fax: Z��� G (p [ Date: June 27, 2002 Phone: Pages: Re: Pillsbury Lakeview Review by the NRC CC: And a discussion on HDI Dear Bill. - Please find attached the agenda and memo on the above referenced project. The project is currently scheduled for review by the Natural Resources Committee on July 1, 2002. Please be sure someone is at the meeting to represent your application. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner City of South Burlington, Planning & Zoning 1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO July 16, 2002 MEETING Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay District Zone 5. The applicant has submitted a traffic study (see enclosed). This property is allowed to generate 220 vehicle trip ends during the PM peak hour. ITE estimates the proposed project will generate 113 vtes during the PM peak hour. The MPO is currently reviewing the submitted traffic study. The additional response requested by the Board from VAOT will not be available until the day of the meeting. They have been asked to comment on the Board's desire for a left -turn lane. Comments from the MPO are also expected on the day of the meeting. South Burlington Fire Chief This application should comply with all requests from the South Burlington Fire Department prior to issuance of a zoning permit (see enclosed letter). Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement based on construction cost is $30,000. The landscape requirement is met. Lighting: All exterior lighting should consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures. The applicant provided cut sheets for proposed exterior lighting, which include: 1) two (2) wall mounted 70W, metal halide fixtures, and 2) twenty (20), 175W pole mounted (18') metal halide fixtures. Dumpsters: The plan shows a single screened dumpster location. Impact fees: The applicant should be aware that road and fire protection impact fees are required with the construction of this building pursuant to the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. South Burlington En ig'neer: The applicant should comply with all requests from the city engineer prior to issuance of a zoning permit (please review enclosed). South Burlington Arborist: The applicant should comply with all requests from the city arborist prior to issuance of a zoning permit (please review enclosed). This application was continued from the 6/18/02 DRB meeting to provide time for the applicant to make revisions to the plans. This project is to construct a 113 unit congregate care facility (six floors,) on undeveloped land. This project located at 25 Harbor View Road lies within the Commercial 2 and Bartlett Brook Overlay Districts. It is bounded on the cast by condominium developments (Harbor Heights and Bay Court) and the Residential 4 Zoning District, on the south by Harbor View Road, and on the west by commercial hotel development. Access/Circulation: Access is provided via two (2) 26 foot wide curb cut off a private drive which connects to the Howard Johnson's parking lot. 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO July 16, 2002 MEETING Coverage/Setbacks: The applicant meets all setback requirements associated with the proposed height increase and are indicated on the plan. The proposed coverages are: building 7.0% (maximum allowed is 30%), and overall coverage is 26.3% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 4.7% along Harbor View Road (maximum allowed is 30%). Parking: The parking requirement is 34 parking spaces. The plan shows 131 parking spaces 92 exterior spaces and 39 underground, including four (4) accessible spaces and 2 accessible van spaces. A bike rack is shown on the site plan. Following the 6/18/02 DRB meeting the plan was revised to show 19 spaces to be constructed only if needed, southeasterly of the building. The Natural Resources Committee requested the 17 parking spaces to the south of the building be constructed only if needed, due to encroachment into the C.O. DistrictlWetland buffer (comments provided). Landscaping: The landscape requirement is $87,500, based on construction costs, which is not being met. The proposed landscaping is $9,150 short of the requirement. The applicant is requesting a waiver for this shortfall due to the existing tree canopy being preserved. Traffic: The applicant has provided a traffic analysis, performed by Resource Systems Group (traffic study enclosed). The consultant estimates the proposed use will generate 61 vehicle trip ends during the PM peak hour. C. O. District/Wetland Buffer The applicant is proposing encroachment into the C.O. District/wetland buffer with parking. Natural Resources Committee comments are enclosed. The applicant supplied cominent from a wetlands expert concerning whether the functions and values of this wetland will be affected by the encroachment (letter enclosed). Encroachment will not affect criteria 3.503 (a-e). Height: The applicant is requesting a height waiver. The proposed height measured from the average pre -construction grade (221.25) is 70.75 feet. This represents a 36 foot increase in height for a flat roofed structure. The Board may approve this height increase in the C1 District if they find that [Section 25.113 (c)] (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located. (ii) will not detract from important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of —way, Dumpster: Dumpsters are located to the rear of the proposed building and will be screened from view. Lightinn All exterior lighting should consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures, cut sheets have been supplied. Staff is concerned the two (2) lantern style lights at the entrance doors will show the hot spot of the bulb. 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO July I6, 2002 ME ETE4G South Burlington Water Department: The applicant needs to comply with all requests from the South Burlington Water Department. Bartlett Brook Overlay District: This project is within -the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. The stormwater treatment information has not been run through the Heindel and Noyes computer model as required. The recommendations from Heindel and Noyes should be incorporated into the plan prior to issuance of a zoning permit. South Burlington Fire Department- The applicant needs to comply with all requests from the South Burlington Fire Department. 'h r� Im pip 1�.F Request is for permission to construct a 113 unit congregate housing facility on 7.03 acres of undeveloped land. This project located at 25 Harbor View Road lies within the Commercial 2 and Bartlett Brook Overlay Districts. It is bounded on the east by condominium developments (Harbor Heights and Bay Court) and the Residential 4 Zoning District, on the south by Harbor View Road, and on the west by commercial hotel development. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA The proposed project complies with the stated purpose of the C2 District "to encourage general commercial activity" and does not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities - no effect expected b) the character of the area affected - no adverse erect is expected c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity —the proposed use is not expected to affect traffic. d) bylaws in effect- the proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations e) utilization of renewable energy resources- there is no utilization of renewable energy resources to be affected. f) general public health and welfare - no adverse effect expected. ��� !� 6� '� � °�' •�� '�r`�'` a �@ � �; �' +�, (� This project consists of amending a previously approved planned unit development consisting of two buildings of 9,800 square feet and 3,800 square feet which consist of: 1) 3,500 square feet of fast food, 2) 2,400 square feet of personal service (Electric Beach and Clay's Barber), 3) 1,800 square feet of restaurant use (Chicken Charlie's), 4) 2,700 square feet vacant, and 5) 2,700 square feet of retail use. The amendment consists of a request for the following additional uses: 1)general office, 2) medical office, 3) retail use, 4) personal service, and 5)convenience store, 6) bakery/ deli restaurant, 7) department/discount stores, and 8) fast food restaurant. 0 JUL-10-2002 03:15 Pm KREBS AND LANSING ENG. 902 S78 9618 P.02 FROM : U, D. FAX Arj. :21r2-465-e422 01 2'00,21 04:24PM P1 WM- D- COUNTR-YMAN 8" W12Ch Hill Rued NorthfiCK Vermont MOW (02)485-8421 *dc*.*vgtWhCr.Awt 1%4 FAX To (902) 87"18 1 July 2002 Bill N&dd4 P.E. J4vtv & Luning &Vkmrs 164 Main SUM COIChOW, VT 05446 'Ymbjoc"' FundOrW OvaludiOn. Of wetland at Lakeview a, pM$bury Dear 891, 1 b"e'evalmted the wetland I delineated! last Apri at the LMWvjqW at allsbury Pr'O*t site, and offir the fblbwkS report, This VW'NW is cucntW'y a wide Place In The ditch that pRmUeb Heftr View Drive exlmidiag ftm a cWnrt outlet unclo- the street to a Pohl dowmwoftm v OrAdift it wo orm for wetland fbmMXj0tL Fr0110 9, ft1bCtiDft1 standpoint, I ftd that this wetland Mhm &DO &M hUdiDAS: SurijWg & gWntV Water proteCtjoM op�W tjw wi% '*ulml OftuO binding and stabilizing the g,,il' . Spteo and OC3tiletiM and eMsior. Bemse the wand nmy Weie runoff from mm. it Wwly intemepts toxicant,% sod A01-at SUVO4 *bIvs Md imcrds =a other 06ponams that mum be- QWTW ft1A'Z1=AM The design of the proposedpmjea WE not not C&S eqt 'e'dw the C"Oky Or the OPPDX11034 for the wetland to will this fuwtion, Xg WE, OMfibiAt tDxiqWs of ftdimcW. This wetland is readily observable from Jjwbor View road, and although k duce r10t brm at &igwfr 'm pan of the landscape , it has aesthetic attrRxtes tw make it 8 for t's fQ=iOIL -nr diaravenstics that make itfor WS fiwim 0�11 not be &&CW by the proj=1 as pmjx�' ,r will the opportwky f abume it, or t& P*Jk to F360au" tl"Iet* fat emsive ibrota inherent in the d" fiorm, the gist n ',U PrOtWiPS flat ground mrfiwe frOmOrOsbabyrokcipp. velocities And dhaTu"49 MW9-v- pause the flows Ud IVIWIW "I'm M be un4ftk*d �y the projeo:t. t)is fi=tjoot will comwe Unch&40& JUL-10-2002 03:16 PM KREBS AND LANSING ENG. 802 878 961.8 WPON :1j.'D'C.OLHTP'YMA4 FAX MC. SM-405-67422 01 21002 04.25PM P2 Bill New I MY 2002 Seven Otbet VOCOPizcd 'wetla'xi functio-ru are not performed at st 9*"mat level by this wetknd: - Due to its sire in felation to the watershed, the watlaml bw only nlinirng "PaCAY for water storage for flood water and storm runofE - Tbare is m fisheries habitat present, - Ncause of its size and conAguration and it pro*mky to & city ShTLI. The wetland does riot provide significant wildlife end migratory bird babkat - No iWOScant natural community exists in tbls wvUav& - Tbare are no tkentened or endangered q=ivs in this vAKUvA - The watiand does not provide opportunities for educWon opt rcmrch In the notwid wkom. - The vmbod does not provide reermional opportunities Oz economic bendits. IR summary, tWB wetland perform, at a minimedly signiftsa k-mL t�sft of the ten rocognind wetland fimetions. BOMM the wetland will, r=Lm in As exobW condition mid confturatios4 the mpabilfty of LW wetland to perfDrm theca ftLijow at pmdM1bV=nt levels will be uiwbaqged. Er=r* a t/ /6 oz 71/ MOTION OF APPROVAL JOHN P. LARKIN I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve site plan application *SP-02-28 and conditional use application #CU-02-16 of John P. Larkin to construct a 113 unit congregate housing facility in one building, Harbor View Road, as depicted on a io page set of plans, page one (i) entitled, "Lakeview at Pillsbury Harbor View Road, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated April 16, 2002, last revised on 7/9/o2, with the following stipulations: i. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a. The site plan shall be revised to incorporate the recommendations contained in the report to be prepared by Hendel & Noyes to comply with the Bartlett Bay Watershed Protection Overlay District. b. The site plan shall be revised to comply with the recommendations from the Water Department and Fire Department. c. The site plan shall be revised to comply with the recommendations from the Natural Resources Committee.& ",51 r 5 Y'le" 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the congregate housing facility will generate 61 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 5. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall post a $87,500 landscape bond. This bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a written report summarizing the results of the computer analysis of this project's impact on the stormwater drainage systems on the Bartlett Brook Watershed. 7. Pursuant to Section 25.113 (c) of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board grants a 35.75 foot height waiver allowing a maximum height from average pre -construction grade of 70.75 feet. It is the Board's opinion that the criteria under Section 25.113 (c) have been met. 1 05% , ) I 8. Pursuant to Section 26.io5 (a) of the zoning regulations, the Board grants a s9,150 landscaping credit for existing trees on the site. (/ 9. Pursuant to Section 3.503 of the zoning regulations, the Board approves the !l�Gwtti`7 encroachment into the C.O. District/wetland buffer, It is the Board's opinion that the attributes in Section 3.503 (a)-(e) of the zoning regulations will not be affected adversely. io. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. ii. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the building. Iz. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 7/l/02 RECOMMNEDATIONS FOR APPROVAL LARKIN REALTY, HARBOR VIEW ROAD The Natural Resources Committee recommends approval of site plan application #SP-02- 28, to construct a 113 unit congregate care facility on undeveloped land, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The applicant shall revise the site plan to show the removal of parking spaces (approx. 16 spaces), driveway, and aisle, which encroach or require encroachment for access, into the C.O. District. 3) Any change to the site plan which shows encroachment into a C.O. District shall require review by the South Burlington Natural Resources Committee. LANDSCAPING PLANT LIST Qty. Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec 8 AE ACER freemanii Freeman Maple 3 - 3.5" 13 BN BETULA nigra "Heritage" Heritage River Birch 10'-12' 1 CA CORNUS alternifolia Pagoda Dogwood 6 — 8' 14 MF MALUS floribunda Japanese Flw. Crab 2 - 2.5" 11 PG PICEA glauca White Spruce 6 - 8' 7 PN PINUS nigra Austrian Pine 6 — 8' 22 PS PINUS strobus White Pine 6 — 8' 10 PC PYRUS calleryana Callery Pear 2 — 2.5" 88 TO THUJA occidentalis nigra Dk American Arborvitae 5 — 6' 4 QB QUERCUS bicolor White Swamp Oak 3.5 — 4" 4 QR Quercus rubra Red Oak 3.5 — 4" 1 AA ARONIA arbutifolia Red Chokeberry 2 — 3' 6 CAL CLETHRA alnifolia Summersweet 2 — 3' 16 CS CORUS sericea Red Stem Dogwood 2 — 3' 1 DB DAPHNE burkwoodii Carol Mackie Daphne 2' 9 EA EUONYMOUS alatus Burning Bush 2 — 3' 32 JS JUNIPERUS chinesis "Sargent" Sargents Juniper 15 — 18" 18 JSG JUNIPERUS chinensis "Seagreen" Sea Green Juniper 15 — 18" 12 PF POTENTILLA fructicosa Buttercup Shrub 15 — 18" 13 RP RHODODENDRON "PJM" PJM Rhododendron 18 — 24" 6 RC RHODODENDRON catawbiense Large Leaf Rhododendron 18 — 24" 17 SAW SPIREA bumalda "Anthony Waterer" Anthony Waterer Spirea 2' 40 SLP SPIREA japonica "Little Princess" Little Princess Spirea 15 — 18" 12 SS SPI REA japonica "Shirobana" Peppermint Stick Spirea 15 — 18" 14 SV SYRINGA vulgaris Common Liiac 8 TM TAXUS media Spreading Yew 18 — 24" 17 VD VIBURNUM dentatum Arrowwood 3 — 4' 16 VP VIBURNUM prinifolium Blackhaw Viburnum 4 — 5' 29 VT VIBURNUM trilobum American Cranberry 4 — 5' 40 Assorted Perennials 1-gal. 250 Assort. Spring bulbs 48 Daylillies o / i of Soli 1ngtQn —�� .5 � •`\,oat r ".� \ ^� � ... �, �Bp �'GyIQ I Existing rP rap swa/e se j ew 51Mh fl sfona) 1706 J / ,/� ,/ '--� ( _ 7rf✓7�f Bring Zoned: Pad. CO New SMh d3 \ " g Howard ✓ohnaonZ-- - /M%m 214.5'-. -- Rim 2 -"�----_'--�� �e1v'��� tto \\ Inv. 204.0 200 ._..�-� ✓v/77 L/ htin Schedule Marring \ � S,Lmbd 6Yianl� Oser:�tkrr Nbfh HN�ht Comment �\ Install stone check 7 PO4bg dreg 11gh6 motor halkle 100 MY 19' shg/e, hosted / p dam. (tyfJ.J (? ad Wedge light MCIWR a' ovpmwe agaal) 80Ed�neib rated gorugo 14b4 100 MH 12' single hood, cutofe 2 me (6F WWIght- 160 L tofr or aPProvod oquet) /// New potio lighting See Landscape Plans _,_.1- - - �',--'__-` J ,'� onservation and Open Space Pr osed StormwoF-- - - _ District Setback a >\ t/et Structure �. 2t �� y a. a� _ _New 12" storm' J 1 •'�4..,QetOf/) —..._ _ / /',N O •T6° ..-�j j /�* j' ,Se' _ \,\ .o \41\ \�, �\\\\ \ �\\\ �� \\ punter A cs 0S _ _ \ \ \ \ Bay Court Condominlums ?y_ .., _._ " i e ♦ i _ Zoned: RESIDENTIAL 4 Pvc re at m✓ 20ss6 rh-- _ a v ���. \�`•� ��� -Screened trash enclosure with recyc/ng bins. �- // M^ _ h�./ 1/ N1 1 / l l _ R '�, ` ':'• : 'z... t Pro\ ea' / / \ S° U//Otfn�ll C/VRi , 2 G New End Sections ,�1 6o net brrl, \ \ \ Inv. 2100 Y"su Ps �5 _ 'wew e' 01 "a1K 9y ce j cz 7 0 N /i �_ \ .\�✓ .'.s° "New tapping. \\ / % ljr/ sleeve and Howai'g�}�hngon \i ,,7\ ® 2f0.0 End action \-�rFe�\�\ \ e/eor/oLC: 1n -'✓ / / 0 i� ---' / eras pdgiro/ve., �'• tR 1�\..y N o�\\\ -:. 19 parking spocesN_ 1, \ �O�at \ �o. 's•+�. 1 (to be constructed KO \"�•'.----,.\2a` �x A ` 8D ° \ Q \ \ \ , only if n dedJ`i� New tenc/n9 rrrr •r\ 1\\ 22o c2 �.� New topping � sleeve and and valve:, ef, w\t •. eR Mew CB 1 1 h F Swimm p® District tbock. t� �--•_T / \\, 8 \I $ / \ i ✓ 2 In 0=zo ry�y o eo � C6\45y n = J '\ l ' \`/< /nv out 20g9.65 45(Kbs/ '--.]-- �i'':, _ '� ... \ 1 1n t7// silt fence T �g\R \_ era` `•"�� .�`- 1-v„- Proposed 5 l ew'C .. -�_ _ \\\\1 1 er ion control -___ -- concrete sidewalk. �\ �\ 2fo I � � - _"zM1a -" zr :-` - tie. 1 � .., , _... e�....._. •C << / /\ _.K, e..w I r�-+� sM a' d�\ _ =i J o� ♦K b �/ \ \ \ \ j \� ?c•qo� / . `C/1 1 .t' Rim -�ai6.0d` (N rkn 216-) 10 /ma's"' -� \ \-..,� � .—: '\ T�/may /kyr pn 3• `--_- \• m {j _ T-'•-` -' rca�•a�, ar ":� n✓ our�n�-; -. �--' � 1-'��L\v_2117—T4�,__• W ,5 `` 210 ��. Pod .. • • .. _ \ `___ ''✓- _'.l -.1.. .. a , ars� a- '— � Wet/ands y- PlapasedN N N 1 ®---._�\ _ ` \' I '•{ new »rs r CB E'" sign / 20'sawar eas 1 �•.�_� _ -_ �" /3\ Rhn = a15.31 to South B Ngtm.yrndS W _a'_1111J s lnl Inv., .lit = .767-- - �-- ° — -- --- RIM = 21725 i Harbor dew Drive j \ s___._ In, / - 2 n I y \ A 210. lnv. out = 210.76 RAn 827 --� - - -- -- --w- - -- -- -- --D4-suH c - --W - --- \- R 2rsss -- - - - - --- -W- -- -- ----- --�. _w roe =1z82 (s uinJ Rd`n = 21631 l .bov y = a10.2J - - 1 �� - - ._ _ _ -�"� out = 207..82 ---- - - - - - -. - n✓ m = 202/3 (E srl I � S '�,,, n✓. o rik TBM Mv. In - 20369 (South) R/m - 215.97 kc.. h� CB A" Cut square of NW m✓ oat - 202.04 PNlsbur South Community Care Center m✓. m = 202.92 North Rl °" \1� ti ( )-�, ` Rim 2a.A49 candy F y y Rim = 217.48 corner cant. pod / / = 202. 97 5-t n v In 21276 ( ) o ( J J- Elev = 216. 10 'tbhn Larkin, nG / - 20297 S th / v n = 217.49 Eost wwme wz p esr 8 ( ) i e an 2n 1B \,.�\ "\, lnv /n a 21209 (sour ; '1 - 1.02 A Allenwood Phase //I = zo2'6z °vr - 21za9 4 I Area ®J.Q? Aaoe L ocotion_�_ n. t.s. Planning and Zoning Information Owner and Aon. /icant. mot Coveroye"s• John P. Larkin, Ina Lot Area (7.03 acres) = .i06,227 sf 410 Shelburne Road South Bur/ngton, Vt. 05403 (B02) - 664-7444 py�ased Lot Catrora (n d des 19 spots Proposed Building Coverage = 7.B% (3O%max.) AWE- Proposed Lot Coverage = 26.59 (70% max.) 7.03 acres -z-bnea!' _Pratt Yard CovrroQe.� Commercial 2 Front Yard Area = 26,631 sf rh p-p—d buidng w!// be served by Parking, Roads 1340 sf. u cps/ w ter and sewer. 1340 Front Yard Coverage =631 Setbacks Parking: Front = 40 feet 67 exterior regular spaces Side = 15 feet 6 exterior hondicopped spaces Rear = 30 feet 73 total exterior spaces 39 total interior spaces 112 rota% Spaces Provided (19 Spaces to be constructed if needed) 2; a end svr y cantro/ Pwnt /O,i � Ex/stmg hydrant �e 0 °!nags Now _1 337z5 FIn/sh grade spot e/ewtku, Aaprol. Property Line -w-- -Ind w- c 1stmg ota L,n / gtow e _w_ — 04-W— PrG. t water L/ne/ gale w/ve __G Gas L/ne .G ;M-G — — G — ►F- G — New Goy lino 0 L-'W'ng tree /ine C/earnng /Units k i —5--- --®-- Erlstmg Sewer LMe/ p OO C manna/. —S P.posed Semonhde ,p Existing Cenledhe of stream "� -SST— -t] Exsting Star Lin/ can a —ST—STD aeon b.'., Poposed-t m Lin/ b W� -t.h basin ✓''� _�"'�.,_,.--�"-- Existing C tour zH 338 ' -' " Proposed Contour r V 14 0• 30• 50, 6 120' 160' (— I—®— a BAR SCALE 1' = 3o_ „ dy 9, 2002 o y added whn 71091102 June 17,, 2002 #,& hydants, Re ooaess Iona, storm water, Open Spore whn 6/17102 Oat. revised Oascript! Checked Dote Design ffb44b Site Plan Drawn iih �y L eke v e w t Checked Scale l,7 Date rAp# 16 2002 Pillsbury \ Project _90jZZ--_ Harbor vie Rod South Burin ton, Vermont fRF&S & "1VSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. —. 164 M%in Street, Cc6 %ester, Vermont 05446 5 -0" 1 `5, --- Expansion joint every 20' - - score 1" deep eery 5' -- Broom finish concrete sidewalk (typicolJ Crushed gravel subbase (704. 05A, fine) Joint Mier shalt be resilient non -extruding cellular fiber Joint, uniformly saturated with asphalt, offering a min/mum of 70$ recovery after compression. All concrete used in the construction of concrete sidewalk shall be air entroined (5 - 7 X) and mode with Portland cement. The concrete shall meet section 507 of the State of Vermont Standard Specification for Class B concrete and have 28 day compressive strength of 3,500 psl. see site plan Provide 4" topsoil and seed 1/2" to 3/4"-- 1/4"per ft. n a 0 � o _a. 0 - a n a a concrete curb (tip.) Provide expansion Joint where sidewo/k meets the curb. Use anti -spelling to concrete curb and sidewalk according to manufacturers recbmmendat/ons. Corlclete Curb - Broom finish concrete - All joints to be tool finished - Expansion/contraction joints every 20' with 7/2" joint filler. - Score 1/3 total depth of �-/f top course pavement is not laid in 70, intervals / some season as base, the contractor / shall sweep and apply emulsified asphalt to base course pavement prior to laying top course. r--1/2" radius j / Ibituminous concrete 1: .77IL Type 2" rype 7E 7" 6" Leveling course bituminous concrete _ (704-A, fine) 12" Crushed grove/ subbase (704, 05A, coarse) 500X -Proof ro// all subgrade with Undisturbed material or compacted Engineer present. All (see rood note P, and pi) TjvicoiRoad _Cross aSection. _ Concrete Curb and Sidewalk Detail__ N. T. S. _ R_ Road Construction_Notl�.s_ All references to rood shall appl�o porkln�oreas as we% 1 New road shall be constructed to the line and grade shown on the drawings. The road and utility laaat1017S shall be as typically detailed unless otherwise shown. 2 All rood and parking construction shall be completed in accordance with the Vermont Agency of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction" 1990, hereafter called Vermont Highway Specifications, specifications found on these plans and City/Town Specifi'cotfans. In case of conflict, the more, stringent specification shall apply as determined by the Engineer. J. The Contractor shall follow Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) Section 203.11 for placing and spreading embankments. 4. F/11 material for road embankment shall be approved by the Engineer. Fill shall be placed in 12" rifts, wetted and compacted with satisfactory compaction equipment to 95X of maximum density (Standard Proctor). 5 Road in All sections sholl be placed and compacted a minimum of 3 feet above top of any utility to be installed before trench is excavated for pipe placement. In trenches and cut sections, the Contractor sholl provide a// necessary sheeting, shoring and bracing to maintain compliance with a// OSHA/VOSHA regulations. 6. Methods for construction of subgrade shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 203.12 or as determined by the Engineer. 7. Any subgrade or subbase disturbed by Contractor, or rendered unsuitable by construction machinery, shall be removed and replaced with approved granular backfill at the Contractor's expense. The subgrade shall be compacted to attain at least 95X of the maximum density (Standard Proctor) before placing rood or embankment materials. 8 The Contractor shall be responsible for coordination of compaction in the road and utility trenches. 9. Sand fill shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 703.03, Table 703.03A. Granular borrow shall conform to the Vermont Highway Specifications 703.04 Granular Borrow, Table 703.04A. 10. Gravel subbase for pavement shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 704.05, Table 704.05A, coarse. 11. Leveling course shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 704.05, Table 704.05A, fine. Shoulders shall conform to Section 704.12, Aggregate for Shoulders. 128ituminous concrete pavement sholl conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) Section 404 and 406. Binder course shall be Type Z and finish wearing course shall be Type ZT 13. Embankment fill for road and parking shall be a sieve specification as follows: Sieve _jFiner 4-- 100 2" 85-100 ,t4 60-700 ,¢'200 12 mox/mum 1. In addition to the above requirements, all water lines and sewer lines and manholes shall be thoroughly tested by the Contractor in accordance with the Environmental Protection Rules 9110182, Appendix A, Section A-02(J&K), A-04(0&H) and Chopter 8, Section 802. 2. No water main sholl be closer than ten (10) feet to any sanitary sewer storm sewer or sanitary manhole and five (5) feet to any catch basin. Provide minimum of 18" vertical separation between water main and storm/sanitary sewer. J. All manholes shall be vacuum tested in the presence of the Engineer. The manholes shall be tested prior to backfill. Test procedures and pressure shall be determined jointly by the local approval agency and the Engineer. Failure of any vacuum test shall necessitate repair and/or replacement of the manhole and retest. Water testing manholes is not acceptable. 4. All force mains shall be hydrostctica//y tested in accordance with AWWA C-600 in the presence of the Engineer. Test procedure and pressure shall be determined jointly by the local approval agency and the Engineer. At a minimum, the test pressure shall be 50 pounds per square inch at the highest point along the test. 5. The. Contractor shall keep o log book of at least three swing ties to service locations and any points of deflection or water main fittings. Books sholl be turned over to the South Burlington Public Works Office upon acceptance of the work. Elevations to the top of services shall also be recorded. k6 Construction Notes 1. The Contractor will be responsible for o// construction of water main, storm and sanitary sewer systems as shown on the plans. The Contractor will be responsible for oil necessary adapters, fittings, etc. to make connections to the existing and proposed units. The Contractor shall be responsible for all work shown or implied on the plans and/or referenced in the specifications and permits. The Contractor shall submit, for approval by the Engineer, o/l types of materials and products used. Water Main 1. The pipe for water main shall be ductile iron. Ductile iron fittings shall conform to AWWA C110, 350 pounds working pressure. Valves shall be N manufactured to meet all requirements of AWWA speciflcolion C509. 7A. The pipe for water service shall be copper type k. Copper tubing shall meet the requirements of Federal Specification WW-T 7996 and sholl conform to ASTM specification 9-75, 8-88 and 8-68 as they apply to type k copper tubing. 2. All pipe shall be installed in accordance with AWWA C600. The pipe shall be kept free of foreign matter and debris during irlstollation, When the process of pipe /oyrng has stopped, any open ends of pipe shall be plugged. There sholl be a minimum of 6 -O" (1.82 m) cover over all pipe and service lines. Any pipe deflection shall not exceed fifty (50%) percent of recommended manufacturers maximum deflection. backfill materials and procedures sholl be as detailed on the drawings. The Contractor shall be responsible for any and all sheeting ond%r shoring necessary to comply with OSHA - VOSHA regulations. J. The testing of the water moire shall consist of the testing of all installed pipe, services and hydrants in accordance with AWWA C600 (except 'os noteid). The testing shall consist of c pressure test and leakage test. All testing shall be done with potable water vnd In the presence of the EAgneer. The pressure test consists of maintaining a minimum internal pipe pressure of 200 psi (140,620 kg/m -2)/or two (2) hours. If the pressure drops more than 5 psi (3515 kg/m 2) for the specified time const/tutes failure of the test for the particular section of pipe. Foilure of any test section will necessitate repair and/or replacement of the folled section. 4. Chlorination of the system shall be accomplished after the water main has been successfully pressure tested and thoroughly flushed. Disinfection shall be in accordance with AWWA C-651. The disinfection process shall be deemed acceptable only after two samples of water from the flushed disinfected main shows no evidence of bacteriological contamination. Use minimum 50 mg% chlorine concentration for 24 hours. The concentration must remain above 25 mg/I. Tablet disinfection is not acceptable. Sanit_ army& Storm- Morns_ 1. The pipe and fittings for sanitary sewer sholl meet the requirements of ASTM specification D3034 for 4" - 15" SOR 35 and F67-0 for 18" - 27" All pipe shall be laid to the line and grade shown on the plans. All applicable OSHA - VOSHA regulations shall be followed for the trench work. IA. The pipe for storm sewer shall be reinforced concrete, class V and meet the requirements of ASTM specification C76. 0" Ring gaskets shall meet ASTM specification C443. All pipe shall be laid to the line and grade as shown on the p/ores All opp/icab/e OSHA - VOSHA regulations sholl be followed for the trench work. i� 2. The installed sonitory sewer pipe shall be low pressure air tested in the presence of the Engineer. After pipe cleaning, the pipe section (manhole to monho/e) shall be tested according to the following procedures: An internal pipe pressure of 5 psi.. A minimum of two (2) minutes shall be allowed for temperature stabilization. The pipe section shall be considered acceptable if this section does not lose air when tested at a pressure of 4 psi for 5 minutes. i� t All pints shall be -Smooth cut existing bit. pavement prior -to Qavmrc. _ thoroughly cleaned 1 -0, 1/16" tolerance-- Existing bituminous and coaled with mire. Thickness of existing pavng on one emuls/fled asphalt pavement (3" minimum) or bath sides. prior to paving. 4 Thickness of existing gravel 4 o rJ (18" minimum dense graded crushed gravel per VT state Existing grovel a spea 704.05A) base :, 1. Set up and maintain signs and other safety control devices. 5 Apply liquid asphalt took to vertical faces in a uniform manner. 2. Reshape hole and patch area by cutting with a concrete saw Oo not puddle tack coat on bottom of hole. into square or rectangular shape and cut side faces vertically. 6. Fill top of hole with t}pe E bituminous concrete and compact Reshape downward solid material and around hole to sound in lifts no more than 2" thick. Each lift should be pavement. thoroughly compacted with a vibratory plate compactor or o 3. SackAll trench in 6" lifts and compact each lift to 95R' of portable roller. Experience has shown that 15 to 20 posses with maximum density of optimum moisture content as determined by a vibratory roller and mix temperature above 250a" (121T;) are maxi um standard optiproctmum necessary to ensure good compaction. Hand tamp should only be ASTMbe used for small areas (less than 1 s. f.) 4. Remove all loose material and thoroughly sweep the hole area 7 Clean up area. Do not leave excess All or excovated material dean of mud and standing water. on the pavement. Remove safety signs. i,'&�Iocement of Existing Bituminous Pavement G Gate re ised Oescnp tian Checked pate Design _ Jh _.._.__ De talcs `aOFt�Erivrr Drawn f� `@o,���Hww,a gLis's Checked / /y//Q / �,1� y� Vt e a NO 5703 _a*€ Scale n.ts_---- l.! /N l� YY L =6s3 +� Date �pn716, 2002 Pills ur °..liPn�NO�� Project 20 27 1 Shelburne Road - Route 7 South Bur/fn ton, Vermont A.-R bS d- I.ANSING Consulting B'ngineers, Inc. ."-I.- D,' PERMIT DRAIMNGS ONLY 164' Afain Stree4 Colchester, Vermont 05446 B- Construction_ _ Notes__ _ .. 1. The methods and materials of construction shall conform to the latest standards of the State of Vermont and City of South Burlington, oil work shall be in conformance with oil permits and approvals issued for the project. /n case of conflict, the more stringent specification shall apply as directed by Engineer: All work shall be done in a workmanlike manner and completed in the time specified by Owner. 2. The Contractor shall be responsible for al/ work and materials shown and required to make the job complete. These drawings do not show every fitting or appurtenance. Materiels shall be as specified on the drawings. Monufccturer'7 product specifications shall be submitted for all materials to the Engineer for cpprovol prior to installation. J. The location and size of ex/sting underground utilities /s not warranted to be exact or complete. The Contractor sholl field locate all utilities and sholl contact the affected utility company, the Engineer and the City of South Burlington prior to making any hook ups. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for all existing utilities and their uninterrupted services. All off —site backfill, sheeting and shoring, dewotering, clearing and grubbing, erosion control, dust control, traffic control, grading, and all incidentals shall be included as port of the required work. 4. Repair of a// disturbed areas, grading, seeding, mulching, repair of roads and curbs, paving, and other incidentals ore included as part of the required work. Al/ disturbed areas shall be loomed and mulched until permanent ground cover is estob/fished. 5. The Contractor shall verify all temporary bench marks before use. 6. The workmen and public shall be protected by the Contractor from any and all hazards connected with the construction work. Open trenches, materials, or equipment within the working limits are to be guarded by the use of adequate barricades or flagmen. All barricades left in position overnight are to be properly lighted. Kerosene pots are not acceptable. When work narrows the usable pavement, flagmen shall be employed to aid the flow of traffic so that there will be no undue delays The Contractor shall be held responsible for the safety of a// workmen and the general public and all damages to property occurring from or upon the work occasioned by negligence or otherwise growing out of a failure on the part of the Contractor to protect persons or property from hazards of open trenches materials, or equipment at any time of the day or night within the working area. Al/ work shall be in conformance to OSHA regulations, Title 19, Parts 1926.651 and 1926.652, and applicable to VOSHA regulations. 7. The Contractor shall verify all utility intersections and contact Engineer and Owner with conflicts. B. The Contractor shall call, Dig Safe prior to any excavation. 9. Layout of site plan was provided by Architect. 10. The Contractor shall coordinate final location and inverts for water sewer, and storm building connections with the Architect, Structural Engineer, and Mechonlcol Engineer. 11. All new sanitary pipes sholl be laid with a laser to elevation and slope as shown on the plans. 12. The Contractor shall scwcut a// existing pavement to be removed The Contractor shall minimize the pavement area disturbance from trench excavation and/or regrading. General Grading and Site Work Notes 1. All area dlsturbed and all areas within the clearing limits shall be graded and covered with a minimum of 4" (10.2 cm) of compacted loam topsoil. The areas to be loomed sholl be free and clear of roots, waste material and other deleterious moteriol. Topsoil shall be spread and lightly compacted to a depth of 4" (10.2 cm). Topsoil shall be approved by the Engineer. All side slopes are to be loomed. 2. All turf establishment shall be in accordance with Section 651 of the VT Standard Specifications 1990. Mulching shall follow seeding by no more than 24 hours. J. All cut slopes shall be no steeper than 3h on lv. All All slopes shall be no steeper than 2.5h on 1v 4. The Contractor shall not disturb ony existing ground after October 15th, unless opproved by the Engineer. 5. Temporary silt fence shall be erected prior to any clearing or construction. Fencing may erected in phases but in no case shall construction of clearing proceed fencing. Special areas may be designated by the Owner for preservation of existing trees. These areas shall be the Contractor's responsibility to insure no damage is done to designated trees. 6. Existing plantings are located in general areas as shown on this plan. Contractor sholl protect plantings so as not to damage these or their root systems. 7. Slope stability based upon unsaturated soll conditions. /f during construction saturated soils are encountered, contact the Engineer immediately. /A l'7j ( "Curb C I -- Sidewalk ramps w/ textured surface 'J S'-6_ in.l A C A / C Gras. strip c � crass .o-lp rx� Sinale Romp On Corner Radius Narrow Grass Strip Between Sidewalk and Curb g u � , _ _ Sid talk_ Ramo �i f4° reveal (—'�'-- 8.3% max. w � Roadway Curb SECTION A -A �//� Sinale Ramp on Tonaent Narrow Gross Strip ur2.— Cb tr transition Sidewalk Ramp Curb SECTION C—C A Ilary Textured Auxiliary iewall, romp __p Rou dig .39 5' 6" min. width Sidewalk 83£ SECTION B-B 5gdewv&=Rama _-,Qe#cuL__ N.T.S. Joint filler shall be resilient non -extruding cellular fiber joint, uniform/y saturated with asphalt, offering a minimum of 7031recovery after compression. Use anti-spa/ling to concrete pads occordng to manufactures recommendations. 6" leveling course 12" crushed gravel See road cross section detail and notes. NOTE: Contact City of South Burlington to confirm ramp specifications prior to construction. All concrete used in the construction of concrete pads sholl be air entrained (5 - 7 X) and made with Portland cement. The concrete sholl meet section 501 of the State of Vermont Standard Specincotion for Class 8 concrete and hove 28 day compressive strength of 4, 000 psi. Provide expansion mint where pads meets the curb building. Concrete Pad Detail N.T.S. Storm Water System MG _ nonce Schedule 1. The storm water system is compn'sed of any portion of the site that directs or conveys water. 2. Catch basin sumps and Storm water tanks should be inspected regular/y and cleaned as required. J. All ditches and swo/es must be inspected regularly and repaired as required. Special attention must be given to winter time ice conditions. 4. Each year o written report shall be submitted to., The Deportment of Environmental Conservation NPOES Permit Section Annex Building 103 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05676 5. R1 ��eNeaimWnbi \s�.\Of VAR waH: Nw y s _c �g * _-- NO 57030�'*- iinil\1\\\\ The report shall provide the dates and nature of c/eon/ng operations carried out in the preceding year. The Owner shall be responsible for submission of all reports to the State of Vermont Deportment of Environmental Conservation. Hay T. pPkal a// i Inlet Protection N. T.S. -- ' pies with for to paving. e Design JWN Details Drawn 7rLQ Q Checked - L G 4 VI {✓ W GT[ C Scale n.ts___._ Date 4pnj 16: 2002 Pillsbury role- _ I ours, r rr°r r .w..ur .KR"S & L4.1YS11W Consulting Zngineers, lno 1'°"` D-2 164 plain StrestreetColchester, Vermont 05446 PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY u ----- 0+2' -- thrust block— powng to match exis1bg .__ Use 1/2 ollowablle pipe deflection The Contractor sham be unpaved to achieve 5' separation, responsro/e tor ­Ptmg Pa ed with OSHA #/OSHA mound s NY iregulations L L12 -? � j catch Foal back9/1 moterio/ shall r1in m basin contain no stones greater 95X 95X �- _.__ or _—_—_ main dry well than 3' (7.6 cm) in al—t-, no '��' standard standard frozen rumps, Gay ar �. Proctor proctor argamc moterio/. (AASH70-7--99)-water Place in 12" (30.5 cm) lifts andcompact os indicated. 717,n ve and valve by Clow, new water -- /Willa/ \ 2 (S 1 ) ueerorapproved equal. Use sand All for Zt1_11 / hounching and initial bock6l/ D ° • Wet tap shall be installed by persons -- (high density styrofaam) 2" insulation (h n/g - Oucttre iron ci52 H � ti approved by South Burlington Water Dept. one full length of pipe. -compact unde pipe and the En/Weer - Undisturbed at is/- `—Provde mhr. 6' (152 cm) T / fCal Ta in Sleeve and_l/o/ve --__--`-`-'-_- _-' - -- - Excavate trench to support_ ball, joints, and PPe equoi/y sand cushion over redg® N.T.S Catch Basin Z Water Separation T ice/ Water Trench Details IV. TS N. TS. Notes: 1 A thrust block shall be #,,tolled of at/ water main bends, end cops and tees. 2 Use mega -lug on a// mschanical Jwws. t r, C A— of bearing [, ushed sfnne l t und/stubed ao ns -�-- Uhal turbed earth earth Section Elevation Anchoroae of -�o/vas_ Minimum one Uni4sturbad salt 3/4°-t //2" C shad ton % fur/ length of p pe / ached ,ta-,e i I I u., D"._. sea Enecb. be"kg area (,ee Valvel-Dead End gala vat ). _Reducer Note' Place 3 mA (min/mum) Und/sturbed sal/^- po/yath� ne sheaf between ' p5,y a// concrete thrust blocks and pipe,%r fifGngs to prevent bond M' c ores char nor oar bolts, etc. of m'ttiag. � f! disrurbod soil 90°_45°,22 1/2,' ----- or 11 1/4°8end Thrust Block Details (®ahhgtan) N. T S. Minimum Area of Bearina Surface of Concrete Thrust i3/ock (in sou ore feet) 3' 4- 6' 6"_- 1Z° SpZ cavanov SnFF BEARM'C lo9a(vsrt a`> 1 �, 0.5 0.5 — 05 05 0.5 10'd5 05 - I.a 05 2.0 25 t5 tU 90 5.5 SO t5 SMnd Mde 1Q000 !.0 f0 - t.0 10 /a 05 la QS1.0 .5 TU 05 I Q5 0 t5 ]0 §:1�1ol 30I •iS 0 1.6 [5 B.S 6065 35 Za SO 1.5 tad 190 30Je51Q050 4 lS .O Ia s°,p ..I000305 TS t5 SO la a� 4a ZO _.._. lo5 Sal&0 4.a - 160 Z50�J4010Of5S 3Q0 Sa So/f From. &cover Finish grade Neenah R_ 1642, slope to drain Leboran LC 266 cr equal Grout from, to brick Presoak bricks before mortaring Provide cast in place - steps when depth exceeds 6' from rim to invert. Use polypropylene plastic rungs with 112" grade 60 st.e/ reinforcement or equal. Asphalt coated------ 5��r, v l� Ire c 8" min. C/o,, B concrete or ----- °' red hardened brick shelf and invest. 0 4: 8" F 1, 12 Brick leveling course (5) courses max. (2) courses min. Do not mortar inside face of brick. Use red hardened sewer brick only. AS1M 0478 Precast reinforced concrete manhole and cover by Comp Precast, Griswold or equal. O' Ring gasket or UdStIC Do not mortar inside face of monho/e. -Manhole shall be vacuum tested while lowest joint is still exposed Cost in place or press -seal gasket for a// pipe penetrations. Flow n9� base section Nil Ll_11 1 -- 3/4" to 1 1/2' crushed Undisturbed material - compacted stone ieol _ Precast = Manhole N T.S Water _Notes_ 1. All work to be performed in accordance with the Specification and Details for the installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Wafer Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington, Colchester Fire District ,,41 and the Village of Jericho. 2. The South Burlington Water Department shall be notified prior to backr//ling to inspect al/ joints fittings main line tops, appurtenances and water Are, crossings. P1 NOTE : 1. Sewer relations to water mains shall be in accordance with the Recommended Standards for Sewage Works" so-called Ten State Standards and Woter Supply Rules. 2. Sewers shall be /aid of least 10 feet (3.0 m) horizontally from any existthg or proposed water main. fie distance shall be measured edge to edge. if this distance cannot be obtained, then the pipes shall be installed according to these typical detalls. J. 18' (45.7 cm) separation must be maintained whether water is over or under sewer. Wafer main (45.7 cm) / ® Sewer Select back!%// compacted /n 6" (15.2 cm) /Dyers-95X standard proctor density. Sewers crossing water mains shall be laid to provide a minimum vertical distance of 18" (457 cm) between pipes. Sewer joints will be equldistont and as for as possible from the water main ,pints. When it is impossible to obtain proper separation, the sewer shall be designed and constructed equal to water pipe and shalt be pressure tested to assure watertightness prior to bockMling. Sewer Water Separation 'Detail__ N. T.S Q 2002 1 too add, thrust blacks lwhn \`aO� OF I aVE, N" 1�,P, H NF;k", Design WNW_-_- Drawn tab Checked DetallS L eke view at *E� NO 5703 �£*= Scale n.t,-a, 3a'3 €qt Date Ali/ F, 2002 Pillsbury i//tlllllltpP�n\`� Project ._VOIZ7__ _. Shelburne Rood --Route 7 South Burl/ngton, Ve Mont A.'RP9S & LANS'IrW Consulting Engineers, Inc. OgC m D— 3 PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY >BA!/fain Street, Colchester, Vermont 06'V46 __ PA VEMENT CROSS C_OUNT_RY pa vemen t 7'-- Fiber77 Vale cover marke- Sewer" or Storm" .Watertight cop marked 'cleaccording to use. .. 1.TCast iron ✓a/ve boxtop or approved equal. 45' bell and spigot elbow packing betweenpipe and valve box. / PVC SDR 35 4" PVC SOR 35 ----J T flow " 45' wye for in line cleonouts (6" X 4 f 45' bell and spigot for terminal cleonouts (reduce to 4 ) Sanitcry_ / Storm Cieonout Detail N. T. S._..- Catch Basin Mox, Pipe Size Diameter The catch basin size shaft be larger than _ Indicated in the adjacent chart if the 5' dJo. -- 30'` recommendednumber of pipes penetrofing theecatchcatch basin is exceeded _- -_-_--__24" 6' d/ate 36' All catch bast, shall be told ago/nst the curb while mointo/n/ng full access Concrete curb, see detal/ Frame and grate, , - fa„sn yrode slope LeBaron LF248-2 or equal. / to dram (rn curb) LeBaron 4K120A itsl0e r ' is greater than 5z Farl•h eo (See utility p/on) slope m oro/n Use high strength Cost in p/ace non-shr/nk grout P Wee cast /n place steps when depth exceeds See short /- Catch basin by Camp, r r'swo/d or equal. 6' ham rim to invert out. - ASTM spec. C478-88 --- Use copolymer po/ypropytene - 4,000 PSI concrete plastic rungs w/th 1/2" grade _ _ J2" - Steel reinforced to ASTM Specs 60 It-/ reinforcement Y - AASHTO H-20 wheel load or equo,. hoeNrdr.in a n pla s- /-Idaterproof sed w'th Mastic "O" ring ---�� ar butyl rape. -r- non -shrink grout. 0 now ---- �1-6 MonoliHrlc base flrsf joint shall Ii be higher than i F 24" o sump " / - rnvert out e/ewtian. c6L, ` � , J i --3/4' to 1 1/2" crushed stone Undisturbed material -----� Tjfpica/ Catch Basin_ _ N. T.S. (paving to match 6xist/n The Contractor shot/ unpaved for comp/yrng paved vn OS mound slightly with with OSHA - (/OSHA A regulations. �. _ aI 4! Baskin material shall 95V 95X contain no stones greater \.�- standard standard than 3" in diameter, no �1 proctor prod frozen Iump4 cloy o gam �moterial i-/ace f2" lifts and compact as indimted. % E On site sand fill ----._ \.1/4'to 3/4"shed stone -• i ADS-N12, P✓C .� \,a ,, 5DR 35 storm T icol Storm Details NTS O+2' pawhg to match sx/st/n The Contractor shd/ be for comp/yfng ® po ed °POD mound s/fght/y with OSHA with OSHA - W7SHA regulations. Backfil/ material shot/ 95containno stones greater stanthan -T /n daam.t , no ( profrozen /amps, cloy ormaterialPlace in 12" /1Rs andcompact os idlcoted.f/4"to jhdorol 3/4rnushed stone ---�PW SDR J5 sanitary Undisturbed mats 1 /----�. main and ser V_ _Lpical Sanitary Trench Details N. T.S Date "sed Oescrip Lion !Checked I D&, Design W N — De tails Drawn t Lakeview at H,Fay, °h *� No 57030-`*` Scale n.tS Pillsbury -/�1i11111tt`r Date AQr // 16, 2002 ?� ' r� l NAL �o Project .00T27__. _ .._..-..._ Shelburne Rood -Route 7 South Bur/ia ton Vermont AR' "S' & LANSINC Consulting Engineers, Ina D— 4 PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY 164 .Hain Street, Colchester, Vermont 0544G Note: Sediment shall be cleaned out when it has reached half the height of the fence or before major predicted rainfall events. Remove silt fence after successful establishment of vegetation. Steel stakes driven on downstream side of fence r-2 "x 2"x d � stakes over/op edges- �' M/ro£/ En vrYafence or Snow fence or Mirafi En virofence /£ swale Mirafi 100, filter fabric Filter fabric on upstream side staple fabric to fence--, � --Stoke A _ -baled hay or straw embankment slope Form 12" toy fabric deep ebottrench tam in -- - cover with grovel existing ground 50 NOTE. II II N I � I 11 '+ To be used in locations where the . _ existing ground slopes in toward _._�. the foe of the embankment I it To be Installed at 50' to 75' intervals depending on pitch, — - ---------- or as shown an plans 2'x 2"x J' stokes Section A —A A. Plan View Tca/ Temporary=Silt Fence Baled Ha or Straw Erosion Checks __._1' Erosion _Control Barrier Erosion Control Notes 1. The limit of disturbance shall be clearly defined by Engineer prior to clearing. Erosion control shall be established to trap sediment on site. 2. The site shall then be cleared and grubbed. All roots, stumps and deleterious materials shall be removed from the site. The Contractor shall minimize the amount of disturbed land at any given time. J, All erosion controls shall be installed as detailed in the publication Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites. 4. All erosion control shall be placed as shown on the drawings or as ordered by the Engineer. The Contractor shall maintain the erosion control measures until the Engineer Is satisfied that permanent ground cover is established and that further measures are not required. 5. The erosion controls shall be checked regularly by the Engineer. Any necessary repairs or modifications shall be immediately completed by the Contractor. 6. All excess material and topsoil shall be stockpiled in areas approved by the Engineer. These stockpiles shall be surrounded by hay bole erosion control dams and shall be seeded and mulched to minimize erosion potential as directed by Engineer. 7. As disturbed areas are graded and topsoiled, they will be seeded and mulched to reduce the erosion potential of the soil. 8 Any drainage swales with a slope greater than 59" shall use a stone lining for stabilization. See Engineer for detail. 9. When erosion control measures are deemed no longer necessary, all materials detained, Including silts and construction runoff debris, shall be collected and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Engineer. 10. The Contractor shall use water and/or calcium chloride for dust control. 11. The Contractor shall provide hay bale inlet protection around each catch basin prior to pavement and turf establishment. See Detail .Sheet. 12. The Contractor shall sweep Howard Johnson Parking lot and new pavement as directed by the Engineer to mointain dust control. 13. All erosion controls shall be installed prior to October 1 for winter construction. 14. Additional erosion controls shall be installed as directed by the Site Engineer. 15. The Engineer will regularly inspect the erosion controls in place to ensure their proper instcliation. 16. All disturbed areas not involved in winter construction shall be mulched and seeded before October 1. 17 All winter construction areas will be stabilized by mulch for winter/spring meltdowns and when winter construction has halted. Note. - Sediment shall be cleaned out when it has reached half the height of the hay bate or before major predicted rainfall events. Remove boy bales after successft/ establishment of vegetation. Hay bale barrier - 2 rows 1--Steet stakes driven through bales (or erect of boles stagger pints---�� snow fence on downstream side of bales) i Set bole into bank - to be Instolled at 50' to 75'- intervals depending an - pitch , or as shown on plans ) I J ) �J V '---Coorse gravel rrlter (or use Alter fabric - M/rofi 100x- set into ground and fixed over hay boles) _Twical Temporary Hay Ba/e _ Erosion Control_ Barrier _ In areas where freeboard & available use l an 2 backslopes - seed and mulch r --------- d/2 � — — T—F-— 0._5_T _.-----I d/4 075 T --_Parabolic�Grossed Waterworn Public right-of-way 4 Exist/ng ground proff/B Provide appropriate transition between Stabilized Construction Entrance and Public Right of Way -- mm. Public Existing 20', 1 1/2" to 2" Right of I ground I crushed stone Way I P/on Stabilized Construction Entrance -- .'-- N. T.S -- `-Cenero/ E/aetric D25S 100 watt, Metal HWIde I 1B' --Genera/ Electric Steel A ea fighting pole (ASS416) Bose w re e T�vd,t, is o°tion: roe rw.nd aa,e. Single Luminaires N. T.S Date -,Ysed 9-critlo I Checked Dote Design . XHIV —.._.._.. Details PH \�pqO�ttbter w,ER�.ji Drawn t _lb �o-�g6�,un Fpa H oo -J� Checked L c e vi W V C n. t. s. Pillsbury Vy + 2�` Dote Agri/ 16-2002 ,Fz.�c/rF�;snE0 "ttTIl11���M p`` Project 00127 _ Shelburne Road - Route 7 South Budin ton Vermont tYRENS & L9NSbYC Consulting Engineers, Inc °'°"` � D— 5 PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY >64 Ifain Street, Colchester, i'ermont 05"6' 7z - INNOVATIVE DESIGN, INC. 30 KIMBALL AVE_ SUITE 101 S. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 PHONE: (802) 658-4909 FAX: 658-4619 E..il " 7-08-02 LAKE� PILLSBURY Vernon[ A4 5h— 7,11c LANDSCAPING CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO?�,, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING ' 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Number APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) j Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( } Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) John P. Larkin, Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd., S. Burlington, VT 05403 802 864-7444. fax 864-0649 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Volume 21 9 , page 360 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as Owner. 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) W i l l i a m H. N e d d e 11 1,. P. E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, 164 Main St., Colchester, VT OS446 878-0375 fax 878-9618 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Lot 10, Harbor View Road, South Burlington, VT 6) TAX PARCEL ID# (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0 7 8 0- 0 0 0 2 5- C 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use)vacant b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Senior Housing project. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Living space = 21,437 s.f. Porch 2,SS6 s.f. Canopy 440 s.f. d) Height Of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement andmezzanine) 70.75' from pre -construction average grade of 221 .25. The building will have 6 floors plus under ground parking. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 113 elderly living units f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) dayshift = 12 full time + 4 part-time; evening shift = 3 full time; company van. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Bartlett Brook overlay District 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing o % Proposed 7.8 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 4. 1 % Proposed 26.3 c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 4.7 % Proposed 4.7 (does not apply to residential uses) 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ P , o o o , o o o . b) Landscaping: $ 4 n, n n n c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Road, sidewalk, curb, storm, sewer, water and lighting = $innrnnn +/ 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC SEE TRAFFIC REPORT a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): l 8 O (estimated ) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 61 c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 61 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 4-6 PM 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Weekends 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 2003 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 4 2 REVIEW AUTHORITY: 13 Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete �/ro Director ot?16h�& Zoning or Designee Date A EXHIBIT A PLAN The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. If submitting a final plat amendment, please submit only pertinent information. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred). o Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared. o Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.) o Location of easements, public lands, r.o.w.s, sidewalks, and public or private street (w/names) o Five foot contours (existing and finished) o Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. o Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks, and other public opens spaces. o Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. o Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative water supply. o Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. o Details of storm water facilities in the form of a drainage plan. o Details of all proposed bridges or culverts. o Location of temporary markers. o All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions. o A list of waivers desired (if any). o Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates). o A report addressing planned residential/unit development criteria of the Zoning Regulations. o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size). o Location of abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Number and location of parking spaces ( see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (see Section 26.253(a) of the Zoning Regulations) o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o. Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE Fee $85.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee ri KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc, 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 June 7, 2002 Fax (802) 878-9618 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Lake View at Pillsbury Dear Ray, Please find enclosed a conditional use application for Lake View at Pillsbury. The previous site plan application addresses the conditional use criteria. Please call if you have any questions or comments. WHN/dcw enclosure cc: John Larkin Deb Sherman Michelle Dufresne Sincerely, /a//. Z: �' � W - William H. Nedde III TO CS C ee 0l44�6/4/Oz MOTION OF APPROVAL OHN P. LARKIN I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve site plan application #SP-o2-28 of John P. Larkin to construct a 113 unit congregate housing facility in one building, Harbor View Road, as depicted on a io page set of plans, page one (i) entitled, "Lakeview at Pillsbury Harbor View Road, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated April 16, zooz, with the following stipulations: i. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. z. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a. The site plan shall be revised to show 9' x 18' parking spaces with a 24 foot wide access aisle. b. The site plan shall be revised to show the interior parking spaces. c. The site plan shall be revised to show $47,500 of additional landscaping. d. The site plan should be revised to incorporate the recommendations contained in the report to be prepared by Hendel & Noyes to comply with the Bartlett Bay Watershed Protection Overlay District. e. The site plan shall be revised to comply with the recommendations from the Water Department and Fire Department. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the congregate housing facility will generate 19.2 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for all proposed building mounted lights. 5. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall post a $87,500 landscape bond. This bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a written report summarizing the results of the computer analysis of this project's impact on the stormwater drainage systems on the Bartlett Brook Watershed. 7. Pursuant to Section 25.113 (c) of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board grants a 35.75 foot height waiver allowing a maximum height from average pre -construction grade of 70.75 feet. It is the Board's opinion that the criteria under Section 25.113 (c) have been met. 8. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 9. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the building. io. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. ■i ■■ ■■ ■i ■i ■■ , ■ ■■ ■■mom ME ■■ ■■ ■i : on ONO I MEN No ,NEI �i it ��1 i�f �Ii I If �l i i�i � �► i.� � i:i C is ��::I� � �n : I •1 �: Ni : I: I :%NUN, : I:: :: .. II (illy : C I :: :: �: :: - .. is; :: Lakeview @ Pillsbury DESIGN INC. lmEaAve, Sulte 101 30 Kimball So. Butlingwn Vt. 115<03 So. Burlington, Vermont e a,'658�� Far. 658 A61 S m�du/res�swer net 5 nsf ."E r l g rip r P ew h {f stonef I170a 'sting Zoned: ,��-, / �. XI ao ?os\ CO L 2 190 G or— �` _ Li htin Schedule ��Maunring 190 \ _S *t al gvwttny �' Mon -- watts Hemet Comment mG° Po*mvm° usnr,m°rwnade f�M e' 9a svreeromv /_,,�'� _�,_ '�"-- \• Install hay bole (R d ftog lJot wAf,•/8PR or Ppm.- egua') protection. (()p.). Bot l0 MN l�uihda9. yt -1W.1111g- 250 fbtoff - gzt-d: sgo?ll) ---200/ \ e� �' ///''' New patio 74917t119 Landscape Pons g \V \-Conservotion and Open Space District setback y.. --. /- \ \ 5 �� N fiat SliuelArC ---- - �- robe �. �Fy / tp \ t \ \\ R\\ 1 \ e Rlt ri �L 13.5- ^ o %n" JJJ 1` /i /aj°ia% \ \\\\\ \ \ \ Cluster A Boy Court Condominlums .' = n ENTIAL 4 e ' PVC ,a' '` - \ SJ =1/4%t J\ \ \ �� Screened trash enclosure with recycling bins t?� %! i Ex. twadMg �I P/ � f/// i/ ✓ .' \ � f ' � r k a � \ `�\�\�\\� � � � �\ r 4tg pavement \ t/// /j// Vf (I I �// / // l l t ns., .. I ..z .,,,'�'w..\-•-e,,,,.���1P./e�C,;W\ Chller \ , UJ 1 (e, Aew.-.End Section iNE I.y o nef b�o,/,{� \\ba /• e \ 210..P. ew £nd /-r ` \ �\` /m?\2135 s \� ` a -61c2 Nr.o SM/ 1. \. ws.. \ •.�� \ \ ti ifoV, ✓ohffpbn /.• �1i��'M �\'`.\y�a� `�.. \'`�`'-� • � \T ° \ \\\�a,�\. _ t'O ,Ir,4 fr > z.!'?5 � � k--^`\ \ �� �\� Poposea���\\\\� New'ttlpp/n9 \ \ \ \ sleeve aril ve. / \ \ ` \ etentio asin I, Ull_ \ \ \ _ '-\� \\ " \ lr + eta'n. \ New CBfr2 Rim' \\ m v. 015 1 \�i-lnslolt hay, baleInlet 2 2 Protection. (tip.) �. 2 Tj�s, _'_' \ \ \•�. \� _ l l d`rl'l-1 ld Zib' =-� ' �--.--�� �.... \ �� ` _ � (; // / .m"..,< ».,,.m _• \.. >..--.-r.'. {� � sae e 9NE - `M1 ` xn`` = New End Sections = 1 J'l.-.�--�-_- \ �'�-'_ -'- \ �-( )'" nv. 2. ':. � LL '•`' \{ st New CB 1' h Fn Swimmin J \ 1 ro t y 9 -C ss�eC-v��otlon and �Open Sp a o h, �\ .... Rim 221�. 1 I Arco jar" Oistrict-$eltbock. 621.1 /i 1 \ In . 2dJSWH 0- 1 �, 1-Ye11d /n. rn a 209.60 /- /, = 209.65 (Was J I. \^ -\ / , �. m � -_. - _._ \_...,_ --_ } f 8..".. \ � \ �.. �-x +� `� :' �l /n to/l sill fence �..3 zm Proposed 5 se. xxQ' �,.-•-\\\ 1 e Ion contrdt. sidewalk. \ 1 1 210 New CBy4 tie 1111 - y j I .i l ✓ \\ \_- ~ l�-'..Gurt-�� ( I,t_,tt R!m 217.6 za0 out \ 200. I �.� •/�\_~� \+'__--`-�"' 'y I 1 / �(.1„ \ d r- � I. .. ll_\\..--__ '' 011 tz 210-% \max rr RV 215.31 to S th 1 v.' i 209.2� CB c"-`` out n 210.76 SMrI�Aa2 ❑ v, \ a ®® _ min s 21627 F" / /n 207,87 (East) -- w -- - / =W. --- - ' -- - { --sMF/ c '--, --yy,.. -. .. ---- \�; 31.553.- ` - - -w'- - ---- -- -w- _- x,. / In 20B. 12'(Seuth) }. 7to.23 - - - - %�- out -207B2 Inv. In 202 f3 (East) I � S SAIH 9" ®.- "- -I v nv `L11 TV /nv. M 20i89 (South) Rm = 215.97 � c.,-./ ° l^ `'ib.e �' CB "A" at row Inv. out = 202.04 /pi//sbur South'-Communit .Core .Center / v. M = 20292 (N lh) ,� - Rm = 2234s pm y y. _ Rim +e 2/74B _ co net cane.. Pod �n Lam, Ina - M 20297 sournJ M.v in 21z 7B my m -.217. as �suur) t El- = .216. 10 yµ,M" qp2 Page. 657 / v apt = 202.62 My out 217 Is I ` ` �\ ��\ M, //n ?17. 099 Allenwood Phase !// b? V Al- - 1.02 Ades caarawrrd zot 6 T o iorl Mao A;t& Plcnnlno ond Zoning Information_T �wnerQ[tvDllcontr__ Coverages: John P. Larkin, Inc. _Lot Lot Area (7.03 acres) = 306,227 sf. 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vt. 05407 pip-gggfJ Lot CON9ro9e.' (802) - 864-7444 Praposed8vilding Coverage. _ 7.8% (30R'max) Area_ Proposed Lot Coverage = 26.JX (70%fnax.) 703 acres Zoned.' Front Yord Covicero9e: Commercial Front Yord Area = 28,$31. sf lne pnco ed b adng will be nerved by Porking, Roods 1340 sf muMefpo/ water an d rower. 1340 'Front Yard Coverage .= 26�Jr..=4.7%. Setbacks: ed-dito, Front = 40 feet 86 exterior regular. spaces Side 15 feet 6. exterior handicapped spaces Ream = 30 feet 92 total exterior ,spaces 39 total Interior spaces. 131 rota! Spaces Provided Levend 5:rroyG to/Point E I mg hj.A t DmInNow . rWsl,ge 337x5 h grotle.. spar demotion FinlF Appror Property Line meµ- ._.- M-w-.. Ex40119 w tr' Grua/ g t valve -W- "-w Proposed fte- Line/ Vt. w1 e Exlst/t g Go, LMe M w 0- 11n, y f� Cldjng &"Its OC c $ P oposed Sewer Una/ annae � Existing C-tadl- of stream --67- Exist/ g St Line/ catch b sin �:Sr�4S1' Proposed Storm Ctns/ �. fch do /n _-338 �-.+^ ExisingC tour,. Z�3 - - 339 - ` - AtT-d contour. r � Q 0' 30' 60' 120' 130" h _BAR SCALE i• = 3o' oar° rsvtsed oeernPr/an cneck°d odte Design whn/tAS - Site Plan Drawn 4,5 / /y//, p p�/�r1 L lJ/�'li vi Y/ OL' Checked . Scale - Dote Adl16,2002 Pillsbury Pro ect > Harbor View Rood South Budin ton, Vermont. ARLBS & LAN,SJNE Consul ling IFngmeem, Inc. � - 164 Afain Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 )..�. Expansion joint every 20' Cone. CUf score 1 ` deep every 5' _ - Broom finish concrete -All joints to be Construction____Notes Broom Anish concrete tool .finished -- sidewalk (typical) - Ex onsion controctton 'Dints 1. The Contractor wit/ be responsible for a// construction of water main, storm and sanitaryy sewer systems as shown on the plans. The Contractor (yP ) P / j ever 20" with 1 2" Dint filler will be responsible for ail necessary adapters, fittings, etc. to make connections to the existing and proposed units, The Contractor shall be - --- Y 1 1 - Score 'Y 3 total depth of -If t coarse pavement /s not laid in responsible for oil work shown or implied on the plans and/or referenced in the specifications and permits. The Contractor shall submit, for P i °e p c rovol b the Engineer, all types of materials and products used. 5' 0" see site plan 10' intervals �/ same season as base, the contractor PP Y 9 yP / steal/ sweep and apply emulsified asphalt _ Provide 4" topsoil and seed / to base coarse pavement prior to laying / top course. Wo ter __/Y_ Din - 1/2" to 3/4".,. 6' -112" radius - 1. 7%e pipe for water main shall be ductile iron. Ductile iron fittings shall conform to AWWA C710, 350 pounds working pressure. tvo/ves sho// be 1/4"per 2. r:� 3".bituminous concrete manufactured to meet all requirements of AWWA specification C509.. 4 P `5" conrsi f` ryps Ill y 2` rype]L lA.7he pipe 'for water service sho// be coppertype k Copper tubing sho/l meet the requirements of Federo! Specification WNn-T T996.and shall 7" / conform to, ASTM specification 8-75, 8-88 and B-58 as they apply to type k copper tubing. - P / ,6" Leveling. course bituminous concrete (704. 05A, fins) 6" Crushed grove/ subbase itum o qa, $ Ls✓� 2. All pipe steal/ be installed in accordance with AWWA C600. the pipe shall be kept free of foreign matter and debris during insto) cover When (704.05A, fine) p. P 8• the process of pipe laying has. stopped any open ends of pipe shall be plugged There shall be o minimum of 6'-0" dell ct n. cover over all pipe a 0, and service Lines Any pipe deflection shall not exceed fifty (50X) percent of recommended manufacturers maximum defection. Bockfii/ noteriols 12 Crushed grovel subbase Joint filler shall be resilient r and procedures steal/ begs detoi/edon the drawings The Con.trocforshall ,be responsible for any all sheeting and/orshoring necessary a" P p p: (704.05A, coarse) non-extrudng. cellular Aber to comply with OSHA - VOSHA regulations. joint, uniformly saturated -*- with asphalt, offering a Concrete curb t water main shall consist of the testing of a// installed pipe, services and hydrants in accordance with AWWA C600 (except as noted). P g (m) = J. The testing of the 9 minimum of 70X recovery; 9" i-Mirafi 500X after .compression: i The testing shall consist of o pressure test and leakage test. All testing sho// be done with potable. water. and in the presence of the Engineer. The pressure test consists of maintaining a minimum inferno/ pipe pressure of 200 psi (740,620 kq/m 2)for two (2) hours. if the pressure drops Aa concrete used in the construct/a <. more than 5 psi (3515 kg/m 2) for the specified time ponstitutes failure of the test for the particular section of pipe: of concrete sidewalk shall be all ' failure of any test section will necessitate repair and/or replacement of the foiled section entrained (5 - 7 A): and mode with Provide: expansion pint where `-Proof roll 0/1 Port/and cement.. The concrete shall sidewalk meets the curb. \__ subgrade wits -' - been successful/ pressure tested and thoroughly flushed meet section 501 of the Stare of Undisturbed' material or compacted .Engineer present 4.' ChlorinotiOn of the system shall be Decamp/fished offer .the. water main has y Vermont Standard Specification for - _ fill (see. rood note #4, and ,p'13) hall be in accordance with AWWA C-651. The disinfection' process shall be deemed acceptable only after two samples of water P Use .anti spoiling. to concrete DisinfectionhS C/gss B concrete and fivve 28 ,day curb. and sidewalk according to from the flushed disinfected main shows no evidence of bacteriological contominotion. Use mi7imum50 mg//'Chlorine concentration for24 `hours. Compressive strength. of 3,500 psi:. manufacturers recommendations. The concentration must remain above 25 mg/i. Tab/et 'disinfection is not occeptab/e: Trpica/ Road Cross Section, Concrete Curb and Sidewalk Detail _ N. T. S. Servitor �Pe Storm Mains 1, The pipe and fittings for sanitary sewer shall meet the requirements of ASTM specification D3034 for 4" 15" SDR 35 cl7d f679 for 18- - 27- ,,,/ `A// pipe sha/i be. laid to the line and grode shown on the plans. All applicable OSHA VOSHA regulations shall be: fo//awed for the trench work. ROOD Construction Notes ( A!/ references to rood shall apply, to pa in areas as well, f. � " Ring gaskets shall meet __-- - - -- >A: The pipe for storm sewer be reinforced concrete, class V and meet the requirements of ASTM specification C76. 0 g I. New rood shall he constructed to the line and grade shown on the drawings. The road and utility locations shall be as t icon detailed unless otherwise shown. +� ASTM specification C443 All pipe shall be laid to the line and. grade as shown on ..the plates. A// applicable OSHA - VOSFIA regulations sho/t YP X be followed for the trench work. " :. i e cleonin the i e section manhole' 2. A// rood and perking construction steal/ be completed in, accordance with the Vermont Agency of Transportation "Standard sanitary,sewer / e shol/'be low pressure air tested /n the presence of the Engineer. After pp g. PP ( ,. 2. The installed PP P Specifications for Construction 1990, hereafter called Vermont Highway Specifications,' specifications found on these c rdin to the followin rocedures.• An inferno/ pipe pressure of 5 psi.. A minimum of two (2) minutes shall be SP to manhole) shall be tested according g 9 p plans, and .City/Town. Specifications. /n case of conl/ict, the more stringent specification shall apply as determined by the En facer. allowed for temperature stabi/izotion. The pipe section steal/ be considered acceptable if this section does not lose air when tested of o pressure g of 4 psi for 5 minutes. J. The Contractor shall follow Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) Section 203. 11 for placing and spreading embankments. 4: Fill material for road embankment shall be approved by the Engineer. Fill shall be placed in 12" lifts, wetted and compacted with satisfactory compaction equipment to: 95X of maximum density (Standard Proctor) 5. Road in fill sections shall be placed and compacted a minimum of 3 feet above top of any ut/Jity to be installed before trench is excavated for pipe placement. In trenches and cut sections, the Contractor shall provide chi necessary sheeting, shoring and bracing to maintain compliance with a// OSHA/VOSHA regulations. All joints shall be Smooth cut existing bit. povrnent�p2or . pov-- -- 6. Methods for construction of subgrade shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 20J.12 or as determined by the thoroughly cleaned 1 _�" 1/16" tolerance -\�{{ Existing bituminous ' Engineer. and coated with g finis Thickness of existin \ paving o»,on® emulsified asphalt or both sides prior to pvv'ng. Pavement (3 mnimum) 7. Any subgrade or subbase disturbed by Contractor, or rendered unsuitable by construction machinery, shall be removed and - - - '- rep/aced with approved granular backfill at the Contractor's expense. The subgrade shall be compacted to attain of least i -- ------ - - --- - 95X of the maximum density (Standard Proctor) before placing rood or embankment materials. a • � Thickness of. exist:»ggrave/ r, q (18" minimum dense graded. n 8. The Contractor shall be responsible for coordination of compoction b7 the rood and utility trenches crushed grave par VT state Existing From/ spec. d gravel base a 9. Sand &I shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 703.03, Table 703.03A. Granular borrow shall conform to 054) the Vermont Highway Specifications 703.04 Granular Borrow, Table 70304A, Trench Excavation 10. Grave/ subbase for pavement shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 704.05, Table 704.05A, coarse ' >. Set up and maintain, signs. and other safety contra/ devices.. 5. Apply liquid asphalt lack to vertical faces in Dun/form manner. ' Do not: puddle tack coot on bottom of hole.- 11. Leveling course shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 704.05, Tob/e 704.05A, fine: Shoulders shall 2. Reshape hole and patch area by cutting with a concrete saw conform to Section 704: 12, Aggregate for Shoulders.- : into squareorrectangu/or shape and cut side faces verticolly.. 6. Fill top of hole with.: type Ill. bituminous concrete and. compact Reshape downward solid material and around bole to: sound in lifts no more than 2" thick. Each lift should be pavement. thoroughly compacted with a vibratory plate compactor or o 12.Bitum1nous concrete pavement shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) Section 404,and 406. Binder course f portable roller. Experience has shown .that 15 to 20posses with 3.. Bock£/l trench in 6" lifts and -compact each lift to 95X o a vibrotary roller and mix temperature above 250i- (121 L') ore sho/1 be. Type 1t' and finish wearing course Shall be Type X, maximum density of optimum moisture content as determined by necessaryto ensure good' compaction. Hand tamp should only be 13. Embankment fill for rood and packing shot/ be o sieve specification as follows: _Sieve - .ASTM D698 standard proctor. be used for smb/l areas (less than 1 s.f.) Finer 4" 100 4 Remove o/1 loose .material'. and thoroughly sweep the hole area 7 Clean : up area. Do not leave excess fJ// or excavated material 2" 85-100 clean of mud and standing water. on the pavement. Remove safety signs. 60-100 hf2OO 12maximum Replacement of Existng Situminous Pavement lsS 1.L1_Q._ e _ - - n,. Ts 1. /n addition to the above requirements, a// water lines and sewer✓ines and manholes shall be thoroughly tested by the Contractor in accordance with the Environmental Protection Rules, 9110182, Appendix A, Section A-02(J&K), A-04(G&&H) and Chapter 8, Section 802. 2 No water main shall be closer than ten (10) feet to any sanitary sewer, storm sewer or sanitary manhole and five (5) feet to any catch basin. Provide .minimum of 18" vertical separation between water main :and storm/sanitary sewer. Doterew5ed pescrlp f/on Checked ' • O.C. 3. .All manholes shall be vacuum tested Inthe presence- of the Engineer. The manholes shall be tested prior to bockfl/L Test procedures and pressure shol/ be determined jointly by the local approval agency and the Engineer t Failure of any vacuum test shall necessitate Design ib Details repair and/or replacement of the manhole end retest. Water testing manholes is not acceptable. � p1 °Nrr, Drawn � NFL Checked Lakeview at 4.< All force mains shall be hydrostctica//y tested in accordance with AWWA C-600 in the presence of the Engineer. Test procedure and "? °om ' pressure shall be determined jo/nt/y by the local approval agency and the Engineer. At a minimum,.. the test pressure .shall be 50 pounds _t. � No 5703 _ Scale n 1.s. / G+i� /r per square inch at the highest point along the test: =O 3 g `¢` - Date April 145 2002 Pill RJ'u y. a``r rrsi 00 - Bunin .' 5. The Contractor shaft keep a lag book of of /east fhree swing ties to service locations and any points of deflection or water main „QtN11W i . Project. >27 She/bume Road Route 7 South ton Vermont fittings. Books shall be turned over to the South Burlington Public Works Office upon acceptance of the work. A_'R"S' �& Lr41VSING' Consulting yns'ngineers, Inc. _ Elevations to the top of services shall also be recorded. D PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY 164 amain .Sheet, Colctees%r, Vermont 05�46 `��" Storm Water S term Jointengnce Schedule 1. The storm water system is comprised of any portion of the site that directs or conveys water.` Construction _-_- Notes --_ --- 2. Catch basin sumps and Storm water..tanks should be inspected regu/oily 1. The methods and materialsof construction shall conform to the latest standards of and cleaned as required the State of Vermont and City of South Burlington, all work shall be in conformonce with at/ permits and oporova/s issued for the project. In case of conflict, the more J. All ditches and swoles must be inspected regularly, and repaired as stringent specification shall apply as directed by Engineer: All Work shall be done A curb required. Special attention must be given to winter time ice conditions. In a workmanlike manner and completed in the time specified by Owner. r I' Sia lk m ps w/ 4. Each year a written report shall be submitted to: 2. The Contractor shall be responsible for oil work and materiels shown and required to te,turgid -face The Department of Environmental Conservation make the job complete. These drawings do not show every fitting or appurtenance. Materiois shall be as specified on the drawings Manufacturer"s product — --- % s NPOES Permit Section materials for y% �— ' Annex Building 703 specifications shall be submitted for all to the Engineer approval prior to installation. c n crass serp South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05676 -Y The location and size of existing underground utilities is not warranted to be exact stri C C C. p or complete. The Contractor shall field locate. a// utilitiesGras. and shall contact the 5 The: report shall provide the dates and nature of clearing operations affected utility company, the Engineer and the City of South Burlington prior to making, carried out in the preceding year any hook ups. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for a// existing utilities and their uninterrupted services: All off -site bcckfill, sheeting and Shoring, dewotering, clearing and grubbing, erosion control, dust control, traffic control, y I 6. the Owner shall be responsible for submission of all reports to the State of Vermont Deportment of Environmental Conservation grading, and a// incidentals shall be included as part of the required work. / / 4.. Repair of a// disturbed areas, grading, seeding, mulchin , repair of roads and curbs, P 9 9 9 P Slnoie Ramg on Tangent Narrow crass strip_. paving and other incidentals are included as port of the required work. All Sinoie Rama on Corner Radius Strip disturbed areas shall be loomed and mulched until permanent ground cover is Narrow Crass Between Sidewalk and Curb established. 5. The Contractor shall verify a/l temporary bench marks before use. 6. The workmen and public shall be protected by the Contractor from any and a// hazards connected with the construction work. Open trenches, materials, or equipment within -- ....._/ feVe°l �corc tr°neaion the working limits ore to be guarded by the use of adequate barricades or flagmen. All barricades left in position overnight ore to be properly lighted Kerosene pots e L- . x ma.. R°,f WOy Sid-1k Ramp are not acceptable When work narrows the usable pavement, flagmen shall be employed to aid the Now of traffic so that there will be no undue delays. The Contractor care Curti shall be held responsible for the safety of all workmen and the genera/ public and AAA all damages to property occurring from or upon the work occasioned by negligence or _SECTION SECTION C C otherwise growing out of`a failure on the port of the Contractor to protect persons' or property from hazards of open trenches, materials, or equipment at any time of the day or night within the working area. All work shall be in conformance to OSHA " re ulctons, Title 19, Parts 1926.651 and 1926.652, and applicable to VOSHA re ulotions. 9 PP 9 ^ ''°rr a°"d u p I ° p - I sid lk omP -F - Q---� * The Contractor shall verify all utility intersections and contact Engineer and Owner Rou d g 5 -€i' m n w dU $IdOwtllk w> with conflicts. B. The Contractor shall call,. Dig Safe prior to any excavction. SECTION 6-6 NOTE: Contact. City of South Burlington 9. Layout of site plan was provided by Architect: to confirm ramp specifications.. prior to 10. The Contractor shall coordinate final location and inverts for water, sewer, and storm construction building connections with the Architect, Structural Engineer, and Mechanical Engineer. S%dekY(iik Roma Dealt 11. All new sanitary pipes shall be laid with a loser to elevation and -slope N.T.S. as shown on the plans 12 The Contractor shall sawcut 0// existing pavement to be removed. The Contractor shall minimize -the pavement area disturbance from trench excavationand/or regrading: Genero/ Grading and Site Work Notes I. All area disturbed and 7// areas within the clearing limits shall Joint fd/er shall be resinent A// concrete used/n the construction of concrete pods sholl be ov be graded and covered with a minimum of 4"' 102 cm of compacted .loom 9 ( % P non -extruding ceqular flber jolnt uniformly saturated entrained (5 - 7X) and made with topsoil. The areas to be loomed shall be free and clear of roots, - with asphalt, offering o Portland cement The concrete sho// -Anchorbo/es with to: pov/ng. waste material and other deleterious material Topsoil shall be minimum: of 70Z recovery. .meet section 501 of the Stole of for j stokes prior Spread and lightly compacted to a depth of 4' (10.2 cm. Topsoil shall be the Engineer. All to be loomed. after compression. Vermont Standard Specification Gloss B concrete and hove 28 day approved by side slopes are Use anti-spolliog to concrete compressive strength of 4, 000 psi., Hoy boles _ 2. All turf estoblishment sha0 be in accordance with Section 651 of pads according to manufactures recommendations. - Provide expansion jolot where _- _ i "-= ' �'`ln/et grate the VT Standard Specificotions 1990. Mulching shall follow. seeding by pods meets the curb/building.. T}Pico/ a// inlet grates - no more than 24 hours: - - - le Curb J. All cut slopes shall be no steeper than 3h on Iv. All fill slopes shall be no steeper than 2.5h on 1v. 4. The Contractor shall not disturb any existing ground after October r£xgdnsron pint ` 15th, unless approved by the Engineer. (/ inlet Protection 5. Temporary silt fence shall be erected prior to any clearing or construction. a :q ,a d o N.T.5 Fencing may be erected in phases, but /n no case shall construction - d ,, ° h a ° h _o. 8" of clearing proceed fencing. Special areas may be designated by the - Owner for preservation of existing trees. These areas shall be the Contractors responsibility to insure no damage is done to designated trees.=- y Q — _ _ ._-7 7F7I 1=__1— — — I —1 11-11 1=1— ' 6. Existing-plontings ore located in general areas as shown on this plan. Contractor shall protect plantings so as not to damage these Subbase Date rertsea oes�ptra cyecrea Dore Design W,NN De tolls or their root systems. 6' leveling course. 72"" crushed grovel. 7. Slope stability based upon unsaturated soil conditions. if during See road cross section detail and notes. aottt`F V4,irrr R Drawn t� Checked _ ,� / / ,/ pvie C%/� i W C% t construction saturated soils ore encountered,' contact. the Engineer - x,„, Rr r ,�P��a, N Nfoo4y� immediately 3.y r r 1� A = Scale a. t.s. _ L V V CQncre#qpgcLl��ta// _. q ; g Via= y' 's2``L� Date Anr// 76, 2002 Pillsbury N. T. S. cecm� SJ9NA� � t(em tp Pro'ect 00127 .She/ urns Rood.- R le 7 South Bur/in ton Vermont XR"S & LArVSMC Consul my Engineers, Inc. a-saxn M � D-2 PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY 164 Afaain Stree4 Colchester, Vermont 05446 U+2, - povhg to match existrP� Use 7/2v wob/e pipe. deflection me contractor shoo be unpaved T y responsb/e for c.,Plx g Pa ed mound slightlyto achieve 5' separat/on: with oskA - ✓OSHA __ L 12 catch ri i boaenlr mar at noa - - < - basin : co ton a tones g eat r t-d 95% S: 11 than 3 (T.6 cmJ dire afar, no standard I standard or frozen lumps, cloy or proctor. 1 Proctor ---- organic material. (AASHTO T 99) o P/ace in 12'.(J05 cnt).lifts and -� water main dry well compact as Indicated x E ZL i uroi Use sand All for hounching and i I&W bock6/1 O - t \ - -. Ouchle Aron d52 ~O 2"" insulation (high density styrofoam) n g \" one full length of pipe. Campoct under pipe Undisturbed moterfal Fxcavote trench to sPPu ore '-Provide min, 6" omJ: ed sand cushion over ledge e/%. bjoints and pipe. equally Catch Basin / _Water Separation -- -- - T rca/ Water Treench Detoi/s N. r. S. N LS 7 "red of bearing m a -C/oss '$" concrete f against undisturbed earth NOTE ae N'ax'kdnFuYN7W/ItiWN. 1, Sewer relations to water mains shall be in accordance with _ Undisturbed earth '. the: Recommended Standards for Sewage Works," so-as/led' Section Elevation Frame & cover .Finish grade, ren State Standards and water Supply. Rules. ' Neenah R-1642, slope to drain ?. Sewers shall be laid at least 10 leaf (30 rn) hoiizonto//y from any fanC170(O e Of Vo1VBS lebaron LC 266 or ,equal- _ / existing or proposed water main. The; distance shall be ' 1 measured edge to edge, If this distance cannot be obtained, Note -- --- - --- -- '� then the pipes shall be into/led according to these typical details. A thrust block shall be installed at a// water main bends, valves, reducers, end cops and tees. Grout frame to brick _ - J. /B" (457 cm) Seporotion must be maintained whether water is. over. or: Brick leveling course under sewer. Presoak bricks before J (5) courses max. morforlhg (2) coursesmin. Minimum one Undisturbed soil--- Use megalug i full length of pipe containers Do not mortar inside lace of brick: _ � u Use red hardened sewer brick only. Wotar main Buriedgote valve -� -ASTM C478-Precast reinforced _ with concrete support i v - 18" min. (45.7 am)' �• Q^ o and anchor (see buried Provide cost in P/ace ---� by Comp Precast, Griswold or equal -� �- gate valve detoi/.above). - - - �`:" j'�'"� !' j'j.�� steps when depth exceeds 6' from rim 12 ® Sewer 6" (152 cm) min. Plug to invert. u 00'Ring gasket or Mastic into french wall •) - - Use po(yFropylene (typica/) --- �' ` Undisturbed so// Plastic. rungs with 112' grace 60 steel .. ° Do not mortar inside (ace. `---"Se/act backRl/ compacted (lolvelDeod End Reducer reinforcement or equal , P of manhole. in 6' (15.2 cm). laXors-95%stoadard proctor density, Note: Place 3 mil (minimum) o v Manhole sho// bs vacuum tested Sewers crossing :water mains Shall be /aid to Undisturbed sod---, po/yethyfene sheet between : wh!/e lowest joint +s still exposed. provide a minimum vertical distance of.18" (45.7 am) a a concrete thrust blocks 5 �' ° y° between pipes. Sewer joints will be equidistant r and. p pe%r. Ottings to prevent bond. Asphalt coated --- -- �- ° ° Cast in place or press -sea/ and as for as possible from the water :math Flow P �\ cs joints, Men it. is impossible to obtain proper __ -- o. gasket for a// pi penetrations a separation, the sewer shall be designed and r' constructed equal to water pipe and shall be • Class B concrete. or ` •' B" min. pressure tested to assure watertightness -�� ft. ° ° prior to bockfi%/ing. Concrete shall not cover red hardened brick bolts, etc. of fittings. • -shelf and.. in verf: Undisturbed soil-b, a u �" ��� Se�norationDe ' tail Sewer / Water _ J N r, 5 . Tee 90 °145 °,22-112 ° b or 11 1 /4 Bend Monolithic base section .--- L._._._.____-_- - rd `a eJ12' min. O o o Thrust Block Details J/41' to 1 112' crushed _-_ -.-- -.-- - -- --- compacted stone Undisturbed material--� p T bate eNsed -- Oesorpela - Minimum Area of BeariCa/ Precast Manholecn ,red Dateing Surface of Concrete Thrust Block (In square feet) ___-��-- J" 4" 6" B^. 12 SOIL CONO/rION SAFE BEARING LOAD(PSF) pus 1ELT uw-s • as' amuc u° a6 us eB.. craw ✓ 1££S vac vo• eB ee. :tzar us• E(S s RtS vu lrsl.vrouc es° 4B. u• a8. u.s ad aas s 26 vac coo• QB Rroua u° 'as azs as aros a IfYS uw so• 'I Rd mua u•. fLA -1 fEd 0. 5 05 0,51 0.5 0.5 10 0.5 10.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 2.0�25 1.3 1.0 4.0 55 3.0 1.5 Sound shale 10,000 7.0 1.0 1.0 O.5 1..5 20 f0 05 3.0 4.0. 20 LO 4.5 6.5 3.5 2.0 10.014.07.5 4.D emend &s�and 4, 000 LO >.0 20 OS L5 1.0 JS 50 J. >.5 6.0 8.5.5.0 7.5 130185 100 50 "mpsond $l700 roum c can 15 25 25 35 2.0 7.0 55 7.5 40 ZQ 1013.0 ZO 35 0027 150 80. b 2, 000 toovw J0 45 I250LZO 4. U. 20 Y05750�80 4.0- 18025.0�14.0�70 39055 30015.0 Soft a/ay. 1,000 Maximum oot� proBeare - 200 P.9 (140,620 kg/ -2 ) N 7S pNM1111111/Huse :Ooll OF. VERr s% cl�Q� H NFo � Design WX IV Drown. tdS Checked Details Lakeview crt * N0 6103 *_ Scale n. t.s. _ Pillsbury �kk sre�•0�?� Dote Aar!/ 16. 2002 Pro'ect OOY27 ' Shelburne Road - Route South 8 rlln ton Vermont lYlllsgS cB L4,VSIN6! Consulting L'ngineers, PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY >GA Afain Street, Colchester, 17ermont 054�ti c 1 PAl!EMEMT CROSS COUNTRY Pavement �.. Volve co— marked s:,_ Sewer or Storm" Watertight cop mo ked. c/eonout" ---- according to use. ° Cast .iron vo/ve box --- top or approved equal. 45' bell and spigot elbow (4 J ---- Fiber packing between -----� pipe and va✓ve box. -"'��— PVC SOR 35 4" PVC SDR J5 1/ow 45' wya for in line c/eanouts (6"X 4) 45' bell .and spigot for temp no/ c/eanouts (reduce to 4 J Sanitary / Storm C/eonoutt Detail N.-- Cnl ch Bosco ... Max Pipe Size Diameter The catch bas/n size shall be /orger than - --' _ Indicated /n the adjoceat chart if the. 3 d!o J1 .recommended number of pipes .Penetrating I�{I do - yp" the. catch bosh is exceeded. paving a mofoh ,existing� powng to m+� h -'et, .g F, die -- 36. fie Contractor sho// be 1 responsible for oomply'ng Paved .unpaved mound slight/y The Contractor steal/ be unpaved A// Batch bos/nt steal/ be laid against th OSHA. MSHA rpsPa'+s�/e far come/yimg Paced mound slightly .the :curb while cooInto/ning full occss - regulations +-�'- w/th. OSHA VOSHA regutot/ons Concrete curb, see detail -� / From. and grate, -- --- - --- .- Parish gmdr !lope eackal cool -lot shot! g5% 95% �' i� � •8 LeBaron LF248-2 or equal to dram (wltn curb) contain no stones greater ��- standard standard �- Backld/ mot.rio/ she// 95X 95% g. LeBaron. CKf20A If slope then J" in diameter, no S p actor �. .proctor o contain no stones greater ?�< standard standard �F �- greater than 5% phfsM1 grade frozen /umps, day, or a than 3 ' dlometec no �� proctor I proctor -' mop?. ro oYo/n (See utility plan) organic material -1� y frozen /umps, cloy ar -� �. Place in 12 bits and. E argon c m to aL, Use high strength _ -_Cost fn place compact as dcated. - E Place 12 l ft and ,c non .grout Conrrefe. riser act as indicated. comp 6 On sIt,. sand 6// - -- ' 2" 2'-0 crushed stone 1/4" to 3/4" P ovide east /n p/ace. + crushed stand —� steps when depth exceeds _See chart /- Catch bosln:by Camp, Griswold w. equal 6 - ADS-N72, PVC 1- 6' from r/m :to. Invert out. -' - - ASTM spec. C478-88 Und'stu tied maY /--- SDR 35 storm 6 PVC SDR 35 somtary Use copolymer polyp'p!P/-e 4. 000 PSI concrete t "•'' h`"' �� h,- ��`�': Undisturbed material---:� �t main and sar: ices plastic rungs with 112 grade - Steel To forced to ASTM Specs. �l ��fr+.' 60 steel reinforcement �2" AASHTO H-2O wheel load •p or equ /. ve and da/n as v shown on plan ; p. l- Woterpraof sea/ with Mastic, o^m'g _ _ non shrink grout Pico/ Storm Details T cal Sonitary__Trench Detail$ or butyl rope. ° ° N. LS - a° D Row _.__..__ N. T.S .Monolithic T4' Rrst /onf 2/ / / be higher than /� sump invert out elevation. " `-3/4' to f 112" crushed stone '. Undisturbed moteda/----� deal Catch . Basin -.. cote rew.sed 0escr4,r! cneak.d Dare N. T.S. Design WHN Details \\\\\PlNull!/lrb Drawn 19' H. W1 Checked LGkeview 4l: Scale n.t.s. Pillsbury _* NO 5703 *� / ills J iAr y Date Abrl/ 16,. 2002 „a project :. 001 7 She/borne Road -Route 7 South Burhna ton, Vermont xowc A,-R BS & LANSsu i" Coniting Angineers, Inc. ti D-4 PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY f0 Afain Sheet, Colchester, Fenmont 0"-ff i Note.' Sediment shall be cleaned out: when it nos reached half the height of the fence or before .major predicted rainfall events Removesilt fenceafter successful estd5dshment of vegetation. -Steel stakes driven on downstream side of fence 2"x2"x:X stakes -Snow fence or Mirofi Envirofence Public right-of-way- 0ver/ov edges MiroA £nvirofence or min. -_.- CG Swale Wall look filter fabric : Filter fabric on upstream side staple fabric to fence-_� I 50' \ .- --Slake embankment slope Form 12" deep. trench \ i�.. --_.' -baled. hay. or straw /vy fabric in bottom �. cover with grove! �--Fence £x/sting ground Profle Provide appropriate transition existing ground — _ -- between Stobrlized Construction. Bo/lost' Entrance and Public Right } Flow I I E of Way - " II N NOTE To be used in locations where the I I I I I I I Pub/ic existing ground slopes in toward �r 1� I 11 1 >/2" to Z" Right of the toe 'of the embankment I I p r II I intervals depending an pitch,. ground 20 crushed stone Woy 2"x 2"x,j' stokes- sr;'Ct10/l. /a -f� fa IJ ..._. _..._ __-___.... or as shown on plans. a i1 Plan J I To be installed at 50' to 75' Existi ti� Plan V_"r?w Typical Temporary Si/t Fence Stabilized Construction Entrance Baled Hay or Straw Erosion Checks Erosion Control Barrier__ .N. T.S. _. N.TS Note. - Sediment shall becleaned outwhen it has reached halfthe height: of the hoy bale orbefore majorpredicted rainfall .events.. Remove hay bales .after successful establishment of vegetation. Erasion Control_ Notes -clearly T 1. The limit of disturbance shall be defined by Engineer prior to clearing. Erosion control shod be established to trap sediment on site. Ho bale barrier 2 rows ---Steel stakes driven through bales (or erect Y // o narci 11.a , Do —Weld n t rr, 2. The site shall then be cleared and grubbed. A// roots, stumps and deleterious materials snow fence on downstream side of bales) of bales, stagger joints -�; / gzss /oo edrt Meror i+niee ,100 t, Shall be removed from the site, The Contractor shall minimize the amount of disturbed land at any given time. .Set bole into bank - to J. Al/ erosion controls shall be installed as detailed in the publication Vermont Handbook be installed at 50' to 75' .¢Ir. for SoilErosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites. intervals depending on 19' pitch ,. or as shown on plans .. 4. Al/ erosion control shall be placed as shown on the drawings or as ordered by the E m( Engineer. The Contractor shall maintain the erosion control measures until the Engineer U U U ,-cno of eis me is satisfied that permanent ground cover is established and that further measures ore not Coarse Alter (or use steel A ­ lighting 'e (ASS5I6) required. grovel filter fabric - Mirafi IOOx- - P 5 The erosion controls shall be checked regularly b the Engineer An necessary re airs or 9 Y Y 9 Y y P set into ground and fixed over hoy bales) oasis �oer modifications shall be immediatelycompleted by the Contractor. 6. Al/ excess ,material and topsoil shall be stockpiled /n areas opproved by the Engineer. TyDiccl Temoorary Hcy Bale These stockpi/es shall be surrounded by hay bole erosion control dams and shall be seeded r05/On Contra/ Barrier All ° I,) and mulched to minimize erosion potential as directed by Engineer. -s e o ud tht i f neorroos. recomm sf enuot/uos 7. As disturbed areas ore graded and topsoiled, they will be seeded and mulched to reduce Single the erosion potential of the'soil. B. Any drainage swa/es with a slope greater than 59,shall use a stone lhwng for �umincires stabilization. See Engineer (or r detail. r Ts - 9. When erosion control measures are deemed no longer necessary, oil materials detained, . - - including silts and construction runoff debris, shall be collected and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Engineer. 10. The Contractor shall use water and/or calcium chloride for dust control. 11. The Contractor shall provide hay bale in/et protection around each catch basin prior to In areas where freeboard is ow1loble pavement and turf estoblk hment See Detail Sheet. use 1 on 2 bocks(opes - seed and mulch. 12 The Contractor shall sweep Howard Johnson Pcrkmg lot and new pavement as directed by the Engineer to maintain dust control. - 13. All erosion controls shall be installed prior to October 1 for winter construction. �- — — — — 14. Additional erosion controls shall be installed ,as directed by the Site Engineer. d/2 — = QS.T-—� �d/4 d L D to revised Dascnp flan Checked Date 7S The Engineer will regularly inspect the erosion controls in lace to ensure their proper g 9 y P P P P __ — 0.75-T N9N installation. -- ----_--- _ Design, Details 16. All disturbed areas not involved in winter construction shall be mulched add seeded before ' Parabolic -Grassed-_;Waterway Section ,__;,._ .—N ,,,,,C, liril/i, CF gE. /irri� aj P; H. o'% oic° keao 2�, Drawn Checked 1 � f G •p t �' /7 7[ October L. T.S _ .. LVV VIV. YY V 1 17. .. All winter construction areas will be stabilized by mulch for winter/spring meltdowns and s .fie a� 1r / Scale Date April q,, 2002 . / j, t°ll/5burY J when winter construction has halted. c sT , ++ ' � Vermont Project _- Shelburne Rood -Route 7 South Sur/in ton , Xfi'�BS c& L4.1YSjWC Consult$ng enyineerv,' Inc. PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY >O main Street, Colchester, Vermont 06'446 Larkin Realty (802)864-Ub•FU r• Nov 21 00 02:44p , LARKIN REALTY 410 Shelburne Road, Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 864-7444 (802) 864,0649 Fax November 21, 2000 Ray Belair City of So Burlington Zoning Aministrator 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Lot 25 Dear Ray, We would like to cancel our Appeal # AO 0011 in regards to the Notice of Violation #NV 00 30. Please remove us from the December 5th agenda. Thank you and please call with any questions. Sincerely, John Larkin DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 16, 2000 John Larkin RET, Inc. & RHH, Inc. 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 25 Harbor View Road Appeal Dear Mr. Larkin: Pursuant to 24 VSA §4467, enclosed please find a copy of the public hearing notice on your appeal. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincere, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encl nov Ue UU 04:54p Larkin Realtu (002J864-0649 p.l (An LARKIN REALTY_ 11 410 Shelburn _- Road, Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 864-7444 (802) 864-0649 Fax 4 Fax Cover Fax Number (802) 864-0649 To: Ray Belair From: Deb Sherman Date: 11/02 '00 Message: Re: 25 Harbor View Rd. Dear Ray, The violations on this site have been remedied. The gravel area is topsoiled and Seeded and equipment has been removed. Please call # you have any questions. Thank you. 4//y1/- 00 -,36 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 17, 2000 John Larkin, Inc. RET, Inc. and RHH, Inc. 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Zoning Violation, 25 Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Larkin: Please be advised that based on information available to the City, you have commenced land development on your property at the above address without obtaining a permit from the City as required by Section 27.10 of its Zoning Bylaws and 24 VSA 4443(a)(1). Specifically, you have initiated the following activities on the above -described property: Leveled a portion of the lot, placed gravel on the leveled area and are using this property for the storage of a box trailer, construction equipment, boat trailer, and construction materials. You have seven (7) days from the date of this letter to discontinue this violation and take appropriate remedial action. Specifically, you must accomplish the following: Undo the violation and return the property to its pre -development condition. If you do not accomplish the actions directed in this letter within seven (7) days of the date of this letter, the City may pursue this matter in court. In such court proceeding, the City will be entitled to seek appropriate injunctive relief and fines of up to one hundred ($100.00) dollars per day for each day your violation continues beyond the seven (7) day period provided in this letter. John Larkin, Inc. Zoning Violation October 17, 2000 Page 2 If the violation described in this letter occurs again within twelve (12) months of the date of this letter, you will not be entitled to receive a further Notice of Violation from the City before the City pursues further enforcement proceedings. You may appeal this Notice of Violation to the Development Review Board by filing a written notice of appeal (see enclosed) and eighty five ($85) dollars within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter with the Clerk of the Development Review Board at the following address: 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403. SincecEly, V, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer 1 Encl cc: Amanda, S.E. Lafferty, City Attorney Certified letter #7099 3400 0013 8407 9682 City of South Burlington Application to Development Review Board Official Use AD APPLICATION# HEARING DATE �c `b FILING DATE �� 1 FEE AMOUNT Name of applicant(s) John Larkin Inc. RET Inc. and RHH Inc. Address c/o Lisman, Webster, Kirkpatrick & Leckerlina, P.C., PO Box 728, Burlington, VT 05402 Telephone # (802) 864-5756 Represented by Carl H. Lisman, Esq. Landowner John Larkin, Inc., RET, Inc., and RHH, Inc. Location and description of property 25 Harbor View Road Adjacent property owner(s) & Address Type of application check one ( x) appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) ( _ ) request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance ( ) other I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Provision of zoning ordinance in question Reason for appeal Disagreement with Other documentation October'(', 2000 Date SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, , at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Application of seeking a from Section of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to LISMAN, WEBSTER, KIRKPATRICK & LECKERLING, P.C. CARL H. LISMAN ALLEN D. WEBSTER, CPA MARY G. KIRKPATRICK E. WILLIAM LECKERLING DOUGLAS K. RILEY MARK D. OETTINGER RICHARD W. KOZLOWSKI CHRISTINA A. JENSEN Clerk Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ray: ATTORNEYS AT LAW P.O. BOX 728 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 Telephone 802-864-5756 Telecopier 802-864-3629 Direct Line 802-865-2500 ext. 225 Website Address: www.lisman.com E-Mail Address: clisman@lisman.com October 20, 2000 25 Harbor View Road OFFICES IN FINANCIAL PLAZA AT 84 PINE STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT LOUIS LISMAN BERNARD LISMAN MARY P. KEHOE COUNSEL I am enclosing, on behalf of John Larkin, Inc., RET, Inc. and RHH, Inc., their Appeal from the decision of Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer, in determination that a zoning violation has occurred. We are also enclosing our check, in the amount oW5.00, in payment of the fee. Very Carl H. L><sman CHL/ddp Enclosures 22173\002 Essex Jct. Last seen Oct. 17. If found, please call 8 7 9 - 7 8 9 1_.: LOST CAT in Essex. 11/8 thin brown tiger w/ yellow eyes, nick out of rigght ear. No collar, Call 872-0198 LOST CAT large gray, neutered male, white on chest, front paws has ex- tra toes, look like mit- tens, little white on back paws, name is 'Cash', last seen at Richmond Animal Hospital. Call 482-2256 or Richmond Animal Hospital 434- 4 9 3 5 LOST CAT large black and brown male tiger, last seen 11/13, Kellogg Rd/Wall St. area in Colchester. Any info. Please call 878- 5949 REWARD. LOST CAT long haired, gray black tiger/coon, last seen Nov. f Phyllis]. PLEASE CALL 5 4-0693. LOST CAT Lost in Essex area around 11/8. Small, long- haired, black female w/ green eyes. 802-879- 7875. LOST CAT Richmond -Huntington Rd area, 11/12, black male w/ white on nose, chin and feet, please call 434-3190 wi any into LOST 000 "SEAR'". 2 yr, old Male St. R-rnard. Last seen at Little Spruce, Ski Area, Stowe 'V"r, Tues. May 9th, 12 Noon. S1,000 REWARD. N0 Q1.1E5T10NS ASKED! Call 802.253-9028 aletaroth@aol.com home available for new- born baby. Please call attorney at _ 1-800-606-4411. A-787 ADOPTION . Loving cou- ple can provide love & security to newborn. Make our dream come true. Tom & i7ane- 300-595-8666. AIRLINE TICKET 1 Coach class Ticket ¢ Delta. Use by 12/0T O An here in the U. $175. Call425-2125 ENTERTAINMENT $ SOLID GOLD Birthdays, Bachelor, Beer Camp, Holidays 862-1377 VIDEO EXPRESS 215 Main St., Winooski. H.Vt- agra, movies, adult a gag gifts, syberskin 654-3651 NOTICE S 11 INVITATION TO BID The Northlands Job Corps Center located at t00A MacDonough Drive, Vergennes, VT 05491 is currently ac- cepting bids I'or Package #4-Dorm #24 and Bldg #2 for a general con- tracting protect. Con- strUction [per scope of work] will be under a sin- gle prime contract. Con- struction will consist of the following: a] the removal, disposal, and installation of new toilet, urinal, lavatory, and shower fixtures and accessories, b] providing new floor, wall, and ceil- ing finishes; repairing or replacing floor, wall, and ceiling substrates, c] sal- vaging and reinstalling or installing new bathroom accessories, d] construc- tion of a new men's toi- let/shower room, e] in- statling new toilet ventilation systems and light fixtures including ductwork, conduit, wir- ing, switches, outlets, and other items for a complete and operational installation, a removing, disposing and installing new doorways. This is a Federally Funded project and the Davis -Bacon & Copeland Collector of Taxes Town of Underhill, Vermont Novembeir 4, 11, 18, 2000 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD —Nye South Burlington Development Review Boaro will hold a public shearing at the South Bur-. urtgwa _ City Hall C r- ence 0 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, December 5, 2000, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1] Application of #CU- 00-26 of Michael Koper seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regu!aticns. Re- quest is for permission to add automobile sales use to the existing ma- rine sales use, 1800 Shelburne Road. 2] Appeal #AO-00-11 byy John Larkin, Inc.; RET, Inc.; and RHH, Inc. of the Administrative Officer's decision to issue Notice of Violation #NV-00-30, dated 10117/00, for prop- erty located at 25 Harbor View Road. 3] Final plat application #SD-00.61 of Jeffrey & Elizabeth Goldberg to subdivide a 12.92 acre parcel into five [51 lots of 2.17 acres [lot#11, 2.51 acres [lot#2], 1,73 acres [lot#3], 1.92 acres [lot#4], and 4.55 acres [lot#5], 1760 Dorset Street. John Dinklage. Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board November 18, 2000 TOWN OF UNDERHILL ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HEARING the Underhill Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Monday, December 4th, MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITY Entry level mariagemeat position in newspaper circulation. Compensation includes salary, monthly bonuses baseil on per- formance. Excellent benefits package. our District Managers are energetic communicators responsible for home delivery of the Burlington Free Press. They interact with adult carriers, ensure excellent delivery service and grow newspaper snliscriptions with- in assigned areas, The ability to work independently is required. Niust have a valid driver's license and a reliable motor vehicle with liability insurance. Send cover letter/restime addressed to Human Resources. Burlington Free Press, 191 College St., Burlington. VT 05=401. E- ruail address: bliart_bfpv 4yahoo.coin or fax: 802-651-480.4. AI- valite divecr ity aiui,u ,tars eity:tluJees and rrl o;"diize luat ,uc- L s depends on fostering an environment where all employees can °ontribute to their fulle,t puteutial. Tho Rtirfiitgrmr Frr>e Prnc, is rill Ffrrrnl (lnr.e,runiry Fnrl,/...,.r tT" e fnet t it Nrsity aman r our wmplovee,: and rer oertiret thor nr.. o'ss d.,p nds on losterirt_ rin mviraornew where aif ern.rrin,.., inn contribute to -their fullest potential. The Burlington Free Press is w P-A TO RESPOND TO A F"!, EE PRESS BOX"]NUMBER Send to: Burlington Free Press P.O. Box 10 Burlington, VT 05402 Att: Free Press Box Need to sell your house? Give us a call at 658-3321. ACCOUNTING POSITION Seeking a dynamic individual for our Corporate office. Pri- mary responsibilities include: ank Reconciliation Accounts Payable & Receivable -inventory -General Ledger At least 2-3 years experience in the accounting field pre- lerred, knowled a of compputer software and f icrosoft (7ffice essential. Must have the caps- bility to work independently j and with attention to detail. This is a full time position with a full range of benefits linclud- in 504;, off at our restau- rats], Please fax, mail or e- mail cover letter and resume with salary requirements to: to IV tv Perry Restaurant Group Attn: Accounting Director 2517 Shelburne Road Shelburne, VT 05482 joanh@SleakS&afood.com Fax:802-985-1074 E,O.E. ACCTS RECEIVABLE/ COLLECTIONS Are you looking for full time employment year round, not just at holiday time? We have immediate openings for several quali- fied individuals who posses math and key- boarding proficiencies, have a pleasant, yet as-' seilive phone manner and are, willing to display genu- ine customer service. We offer competitive pay, health, dental, vacation/ sick'tirne, 401k and many more benefits! Resume to: CFO AIDC, PO Box 80 Williston, VT, 05495 America...ttmuggler s Notch Resort. "With a minimum commitment of only 16 hours per week. you II receive a Season Pass for yourself and each immediate family member. Don't miss this opportunity! Start date: December 1, 2t100. fvlu-.t be 18 years of age or older. Call Iris or Shannon today at 1-800-644-1180 for details. EDE. CHILDCARE The PlayCare Center is currently accepting app!i- cations for our infant and toddler programs in Rich- mond. FT & PT positions avail. exp. required. Please call Jennifer it 985-0787 for more into. ELECTRICIAN Journey or Master. Earn more S. Benefits, bonuses. Great team, great work. Dedi- cation valued and re- warded. 899 1142 01r,1111 EMPLOYMENT 12 A & . P MECHANIC "T TPE 331 engine experi- ence a plus, Contact Brenda or Heather ,at 603-766-2003 Lot Classifieds work for you. Call SW3321 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Take charge person needed to ensure smooth operation of busy office in South Burlington. Suc- cessful candidate must have excellent organiza. tional'skills, demonstrated word processing and spreadsheet ability, eng- aging telephone manner, good communication skills. Proficiency in Mi- crosoft Office and Lotus Notes a plus. Knowledge of basic office equipment and ability to handle multi- ple tasks essential. Com- ppetitive salary and excel- lentbenefits. EOE. Send resume and cover letter by November 28, 2000 to Mary Donald -Abair, American Cancer Society, 11 Loomis Street, Montpelier, VT 05602 apply III pulsull at. Yankee Lanes Colchester, 215 Lower Mountain View Dr, Colchester [by Costcot. Ask for Paul. No phone calls please. ENTRY LEVEL MANAGEMENT Opportunities available with professional organiz- ation in So. Burlington and St Albans areas. Qualified candidates will Possess positive attitude, Professional demeanor and be looking for a ca- reer opportunity with growth potential. Excel- lent salary and benefits package included. Call to- day for consideration or more information. EDE. Gel ctu rnE pai life poi ad, as; Sul Se Ne ten Wil e-n net 20( Me adi the 654 Imf trut got Fat a 381 Iola duE THE EMPLOYMENt PEOPLE 180216SO.9111 054 EMPLOYMENT 12 EMI waera ADC Automotive CA Full "a nee PARTS DELIVERY DRIVER Pot Ever considered a career Pro in auto parts... here is exj your opportunity to work Dad in Vermont's largest parts hav department that is still ver growing. Heritage Ford skil has an immediate Open- and ing for a delivery driver. ing Must be reliable, able to ties work independently, en- con joy driving iong dis- hav tances, and have a ing squeaky clean driving re- ord cord. We offer top pay, trail great benefits and the op- ablf portunity to advance in ses the auto parts industry. con Interested??? Call Steve Sea Weiner, our Parts Direc- Ser tor at 865-8148 to sched- Sea ule an appointment or Stot send your resume to our 056 HR Department 51 P.O. Box 1100 Burlington VT CU 05402-1100 Sell your Psts Free Press Classified 656.3321 ADVERTISING RETAIL SALES Excellent opportunities available in our Retail Advertising Department. If you are sales -orient- ed, self -motivated, goal -oriented with several years of marketing/advertising or sales experi- ence, and can work creatively with our advertis- ers to develop successful ad campaigns, one of these opportunities may be for you. These oppor- tunities, offer exciting career financial rewards Mail or fax cover letter/resume to: Barbara J. Ross, Human Resources director, The Burlington Free Press 101, t 011-, 7, c'0,-.f Burlington, VT 05401. The Rorlington Free Prey,: in Foual Oririortnni+,; FmnL,v,>r vV,� ,.,im- r di" It IE I "^(711-vl.lr reC,11i nt7l' 'w't;l