HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-02-33 - Decision - 1275 Airport Parkway#SD-02-33
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
STATE OF VERMONT
COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Re: Final plat application #SD-02-33 of Jeff Nick, J. L. Davis Realty to amend a
previously approved subdivision consisting of. 1) a 3.6 acre lot (lot C), and 2) a 15.7 acre
lot (lot B). The amendment consists of minor boundary line adjustments that will result
in: 1) lot C increasing in size from 3.6 acres to 5.8 acres, and 2) reducing the size of lot B
from 15.7 to 13.5 acres, 1275 Airport Parkway.
On the 4h of June 2002, the South Burlington Development Review Board approved the
request of Jeff Nick, J. L. Davis Realty for final plat approval under Section 204 of the
South Burlington Subdivision Regulations based on the following findings:
1) This project consists of a minor boundary line adjustments that will result in 1) lot
C increase in size from 3.6 acres to 5.8 acres, and 2) reducing the size of lot B from
15.7 to 13.5 acres, 1275 Airport Parkway. This project was reviewed for sketch on 3
April, 2001.
2) The owner of record is Kitty Berard Noyes and Cherie A. Baldwin Trustees of
June A. Berard Revocable Trust.
3) This property is located in the Mixed Industrial, Commercial District, and
Conservation Open Space District, is bounded on the north by the Winooski River, on
the east by a vacant lot and Berard Drive, on the south by commercial properties, and
on the west by a vacant lot.
4) Boundary Line Adjustment: The proposed boundary line adjustment moved the
north to south property boundary line between lot B and lot C to the east.
5) Lot size/ Frontage: All the proposed lots meet the minimum lot size requirement
and frontage requirement.
6) C.O. District: The plans should be revised to note the 50 foot buffer around the
wetland areas is part of the C. O. District.
DECISION AND CONDITIONS
Based on the above Findings of Fact, South Burlington Development Review Board
approves final plat application #SD-02-33 of Jeff Nick, J.L. Davis Realty to amend a
previously approved subdivision consisting of. 1) a 3.6 acre lot (lot C), and 2) a 15.7 acre
lot (lot B). The amendment consists of minor boundary line adjustments that will result
in: 1) lot C increasing in size from 3.6 acres to 5.8 acres, and 2) reducing the size of lot B
from 15.7 to 13.5 acres, 1275 Airport Parkway, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans,
page one (1) entitled, "Proposed 2 Lot Subdivision Berard Drive South Burlington,
Vermont", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated April 12,
2001, last revised on October 25, 2001, with the following stipulations:
1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval
shall remain in effect.
2. The plat plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require
approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Four (4) copies of the approved
revised plat plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to
recording.
a. The final plat plan shall be revised to indicate the C.O. District/Wetland
buffer around the wetland located on lots A & C.
3. Any change to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington
Development Review Board.
4. The final plat plan (Marsh survey plat) shall be recorded in the land records
within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the
Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the
applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of
the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning &
Zoning.
Chair or`C-6&— Date
� South Burlington Development Review Board
Please Note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to
24 V.S.A. § 4471 and V.RC.P. 76, in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is
SI50.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be
lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4472(d)
(exclusivity of remedy; finality).
2