Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0020 Harbor View Road
s outhb urfin ort. PLANNING & ZONING September 15, 2016 Re: #SP-16-64 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc ely, //aymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com W120 gig southurlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- 0 - V (office use onl ) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ✓❑Administrative ❑Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): John Larkin, Inc, 410 Shelburne Road, Burlington VT (802)864-7444 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Same 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Bill Nedde, Krebs and Lansing Engineers, 164 Main Street, Suite 201, Colchester, VT 05446 (802) 878-0375 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: bill.nedde@krebsandiansing.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 20 Harbor View Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0780-00020 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Approval of parking space delineation and existing landscaping features b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Assisted Living Facility c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Same - no new uses d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 19160 sf footprint unchanged e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): unchanged f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 62 units unchanged g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): unchanged h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 2.53 a. Building: Existing 17.4 % / Proposed 17.4 % / Sq. Ft. 19160 sq. ft. 19160 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 37.5 % / 41295 sq. ft. Proposed 37.5 % / 41295 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 7.7 % / 1158 sq. ft. Proposed 7.7 % / 1158 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 0 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: $0 s0 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): Line striping $500 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): N/A 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N/A 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 2016 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the 4VVJlie of submitting the sit 9 pi n application in ac dance with the ci 's fee schedule. 4- . q 4� Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 C C NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGN RE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: / v REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incoawlete dministrative OWicer at The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 C Pillsbury South Abutters List August 30, 2016 0780-00025 0150-00235 0040-00100 Larkin John Inc. Larkin John Inc. NFI Vermont, Inc. 410 Shelburne Road 410 Shelburne Road 30 Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 25 Harbor View Road 235 Bay Crest 100 Allen Road 0040-00090 040-00080 0780-00008 Larkin John Inc. SLW Associates LLC KSI Commercial Properties LLC 410 Shelburne Road 80 Allen Road 81 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 90 Allen Road 8 Harbor View Drive (merged w 0780-00012) City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer RE: Agenda #9, Application #CU-14-09 & #SP-14-36 DATE: August 14, 2014 Conditional use application #CU-14-09 & site plan application #SP-14-36 of William Spalding to amend a previously approved 21,012 sq. ft. 62 unit congregate care facility. The amendment consists of expanding the canopy entrance from 145 sq. ft. to 345 sq. ft., 20 Harbor View Road. The applicant did not pick up the placard to be displayed on the property in time to provide the required 15 day public notice. Staff therefore recommends the Board continue this application to the next meeting scheduled for September 2nd 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com r y i �F n ��► } oprIANW1 PLANNING & ZONING Permit # ck - r -1 -0 � (office use only) CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE / MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): Request for a conditional use Request for a variance Other 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deeJ, mailing address, phone & fax ft N VVA � P6 //- 7Mee- 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone, fax #) 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax #, if different from above): 4f a. Contact e-mail address: 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: a km Aft/ ✓&ffff Z/% 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 4y 1S R - 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Projec�t Description (describe what you are proposing): b. Eeexisting Uses on Propert (includin description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): .J"aWe d. Total building square footage on ropert'roposed pi ldin & existing building to remain): 04,0W AW FAAW . r� �/� J/(.P/0?t" ZWIM Zb fiA Wa (K- e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): 04CIV-4ale f. Num�er of residjntial Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): g. Number of employees): _" & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): 2 Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8) LOT COVERAGE a. Total parcel size: 1 tO 90 (o + l— Sq. Ft. b. Buildings: Existing 3%/ 4'5 0ovSq. Ft Proposed % / Sq. Ft. c. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing .,p��;p,&% / Sq. Ft. Proposed % / Sq. Ft: d. Front yard impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existingy n( % Sq. Ft. Proposed % / Sq. Ft. Total area to be disturbed during construction: AOQ + l -- Sq. Ft. *Cop_", CCtiV)0tO� J * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 15 t 00 C:� b. Landscaping $ (, ,SOO c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION , r 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE0 14) PLANS AND FEE Plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time AM 47 3 Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. S NATURE F APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: / I have review d this application and find it to be: COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 Permit Number SP- - Y f office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW El Administrative Y<Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OW ER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing addr�ess, phone and fax #): + 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone aAd fax #): r— o`340-3 S(0 --- 3 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone &fax #): � ``►a VY 1 f `� n c� 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: c t-Lc\ooc ,�i l Q,t� ,� � r- (l 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): [off 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): 8 1 , , 1 cc,,, r1 o em gzk'-�n e rm-Cc, n n b. Existing Use on Property (inclt},ding description and ize of each separate use): ` t a c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain):,,�Q d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): pm,,< 3 , d00 (9 Ono Sye'n e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): U r1 C,('1� ✓►�-,Q f. Number of residential ugits (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 0, )QU {�—Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing _ % / A{' , 00 O sq. ft. Proposed — % / sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing unc Vi"n % / sq. ft. Proposed % / — sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing L, nc n �, % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) !!JD0 * CdeLL� Car) -De l) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ ; 00 C) b. Landscaping: $ C , Cj U c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC rr,- a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): h CJ�1� oc, 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: r C, ot-0 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Administrative 0 The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, applyfor, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 Permit Number SP- 4 - 00 / (office use only APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ElAdministrative ❑Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): John Larkin, Inc 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 05401 864-7444 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): same 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Deborah Sherman; 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 864-7444 fax 864-0649 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: debsherman@larkinrealty.net 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 20 Harborview Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0780-00020 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Re -delineation of 3 parking spaces ( numbered 24,25,26 on site plan. ) b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Assisted Living facility c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): same use d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 19160 sf footprint unchanged e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): unchanged f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 62 units unchanged g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): unchanged h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 2.53 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 17.4 % / 19160 sq. ft. Proposed 17.4 % / 19160 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 37.5 % / 41295 sq. ft. Proposed 37.5 % / 41295 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 7.7 % / 1158 sq. ft. Proposed 7.7 % / 1158 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 0 * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: $0 $0 c. Other site improvements (please list witli cost): line striping 75.00 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): n/a 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: n/a 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: n/a 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: December 2016 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time o submitting the site plan application in ac orda c with the city's fee sche.A �+�G 0 AIL /w �I ��f/U ��iv�,.�/1 FYI / Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 C I NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. x SIGNATURE Or -APPLICANT i r car vvui/C�-� u44uz'jv AAA !J U W'4: W SIGNATURE OF PAOPERTY OWNER V PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I /� REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board E Administrative Officer I have reviewed his site plan application and find it to be: Comp. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form_ Rev. 12-2011 to O�te 7 Rood John Lorkin, Inc. e$ Shelburne ex, sieewoo- ��_ \ Mf -.— �.�..•' " Pad 6,'09 \ arch 7 \` w°°° ` m° 8' x 22' Parallel space from Pesch Landscape drawings (2 typ.) I Pillsbury Monor Sty th vv ` 20 Morbor View Drive vv Areo = 2.5J Acres Existing Bui/ding Lots 7&8 \) I I ( \ \\ \ Porch cogopy 07 I \ mecno°rtor / \\y 1\ II O t N; O II OIN � . � \\ ... 6 1 I 1 .... -. ._ — _� sieew°lx I i' \ 3Q I ••. In \ ex 50 Gpr&ervallon one \ 8' x 18, Handicap space (2 typ.) m, 50 ne \\ Co('s�rran - 9' x 18' Standard space ItYP•1 O n V Vq 15 Sideyasetbdck\ v V — - " � 9' min. (hP V 1 \ F (\ Parch vn9,,,v, © ® © f6 i l alp -ran / \ iZi m a V V i' R°,wd 1 �ranee 1 \ \ \ I oivn o' � I V A y i -�- _ fr � 82'4 n I �° :� \ .� � �.- - -- � - _\ (l 1 Wermon t. Inc. I 20 JIJ I - \ ° v - SLW ASSOC Stri ed area for dumpster access Harbor View Drive Locotion Mop Not to stole Plannina and Zoning Information Owner and Applicant: John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road Budington Vt 05403 1802) 864-7444 Area'. 2.53 acres Zoned. C.--al Lot Coverage: Existing Proposed Buildings 18, 160 s/ 17.4% 18,160 at 17.4% (unchanged) Paved/Concrete 22135 1 201% 22135 at 201%(unchanged) Total lot coverage 41,295 at 37.5% 41,295 at 37,5%(unchanged) Front yard-. 15 1010. Paved 1.158 at 7.7% 1, 158 at 7.7%(unchanged) Parking. Previous approved: 26 spaces This Application is to delineate the required spaces and update the Landscape Plan The existing building W it continue to be served by municipal water and sewer. Notes: 1. rhis plan is not a boundary survey The property lines shown are based on he Bartlett Subdiw'sion and ore considered approximate. Contour e/ewtions ore based on L/DAR orthophotography from the Vermont Center far Geographic /nlarmotian (✓CGl) website. J. The underground utiiies shown on this plan ore based on project related design drawings and limited wsible site observations Underground utilities ore approximate and not warranted to be exact ar complete Dig Sole sholl be contacted prior to any excovatton. 4. Project north is related to a t982 observatton of magnetic narth. 0, 20' 40' 80' 120' - - 8' x 18' striped area for handicap access Bor stole 1" = z0 -- -- / ' _ ... \ \. \ \ \ \ Dale wsee Description Lriecxee D°fe -- - Site Plon Design ww ELM (,'al City Porkg Space Approwt) \ \\ Drown oNA c Checked _ _* -NO 5703 *_ Scole _ 2D- Pillsbury Manor Sou th \ %�" Data 8-2J-16 \ � t \ sT �'r FS 1 ' "11111 7 South Burlin ton 1 i _ A -Lots- \In Ai1NfAx1o� Project l6 8 20 Harbor V'ew o0 nears 7n ...,..... _ Xtl�BS LANSINC Consultzny nga c• SP-1 Permit Review Only >64 din Street, Colchester, Vermont 05446 Harbor View Drive \ to US Route 7 Shelburne Rood \ ex, s/dsw°/k NDE ' GECIDEOUS T SHRUBS FIgE HYDRANT \ CRAB APPIE CRAB APPLE����_I��\bd1���)J TRANSFORMER EXISTING CONCRETE PATIO DECIDEDUS 5� SHRUBS CRAB APPLE HITE PINE WHITE PINE 0 eYrn° C x�o OECIDOUS ICII /� DECIDEOUS SHRUBS SHRUBS 7,� p� DECIDED LINDEN III\ SHRUB STONE WALL 14 mop/e EXISTING MAPUE--0 Lot FLOWER BED I.X CRAB APPLE FL R BED DECIDOUS SHRUBS �� u ax rip-rop DECIDOUS SHRL LANDSCAPING PLAN I SCALE: 1'-20'-0' J10 CRAB APPLE wpod wn CRAB APPLE XIS71MG RAMP AS APPLE DECIDED SHRUBS EXISTING BUILDING FLOWER BEDS RAMP MECH SPACE - AFRICAN LILACS E%ISTINC CANOPY FLOWER BE DECIDOUS SHRUBS CRAB APPLE FLOWER B DS-T LIGHT POLE 1 CRAB APPLE o O.O ASPHALT SIDEWALK FIRE HYDRANT FLOWER BOXES EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING PORCH ® EXISTING PARKING LOT DECIDOUS SHRUBS mllopmmllapoo0v00v0001111,1, � �x o Sfe FIRE HYDRANT e� EXISTI OWER BED FLOWER BED SIGN O O O O O O SNOW STORAGE AREA F— SNOW STORAGE AREA I EXISTING TREE LINE — to motch �'�Zc4kc _n�ZyZ 3 4CC5_=G F czc3ac Of } O 0- U ZQ QU C LLI G Z a H O Z W z LL C r\ 0 m 1 Z x JLD w N J o SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" DATE: 06/23/2014 DRAWN BY: WGI CHECKED BY: xxxxxxxx PROJECT: -XXXXXX SHEET TITLE: EXISTING LANDSCAPING PLAN DRAWING N0. A2 M c C-) m D r a z A , THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF o NDIS R ,� ZZ PILLSBURY MANOR RE -DESIGN OF ENTRANCE CANOPY % GNCT 4DESOION STUDIOS, REPRODUCED, DUCE O 0 -. Design OR THECONTENT THEREOF USED, IN z $fUStudiosn - ` { WTIOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE OWT14 WRLIW.TM, V=14NT PRIOR WRITTEN CON SENTOF STEVE D r /J 77 College Street, Ste, 2A Burlington, VT 05401 GUILD z O iP)802-497-0895 (Fj602-861-3110 G4des,gnShrJbs. P �Qµa,OC CO S I- uz �gz VZ03�V \ \ Route 7 Harbor View Drl,ve to US She/bums Rood \ \ h IC�1 � o ex. s�eewoitr 5 — — uNDE SHRUDECIDSUS SHRUBS \ N o rna rn c 0 FIRE HYDRANT �\ y CRAB CRAB APPLE_-\� APPLE TRANSFORMER CONCRETE PATIO AdEXISTING W SHRUBS US lb, 0SHRUBS CRAB APPLE ,,)ITE WHITE PINE` Coza6o PINE $� LINDEN DECIDOUS DECIDEWS SHRUBS DECID SHRUB U n lI"m STONE WALL Me EXISTING ORCM waai/ W CRAB APPLE CRAB APPLE \ 70 Leo E%ISDNG RAMP IRE HYDRANT see ^� MAPLE CRAB APPLE E%ISTI ONER BED FLOWER BED SIGN EXISTING BUIIDINC ROWER BED DECIDEOUS SHRUBS \ L O t % FLOWER BED CRAB APPLE RAMP MECH SPACE _ -- AFRICAN LILACS (� L.L O XIS71MG CANOPY FLOWER BE O? Z Q DECIDOUS SHRUBS CRAB APPLE Q U ` W Z iL R BED LIGHT POLE FLOWER B DS I U DECIDOUS SHRUBS CRAB APPLE OwU J O O G Z 0 ` F Z `N}OF ASPHALT lip W SIDEWALK FIRE HYDRANT FLOWER BOXES EXISTING SIDEWALK O L D XISTING PORCH m ca M LE O w O Q coreray EW BIKE RACK EXIBDNG PARKING LOT I ex rqi-rap CO RED B SEMENT VA 4A N VAN L.L DECIDOUS SHRUBS 7-E%ISTINC PAVEMENT WALKWAY �C ® © © l� �1 © ® O9 ® © © © O © © tt T O / ® © SNOW STORAGE AREA dyed Path fKP DECIDOUS SHRUBS pampster LANDSCAPING PLAN F ae NELINKLOSUREN \ FENCE FENCE ENCLOSURE SCALE: 1"s20'-0' IpQ SNOW STORAGE AREA EXISTING TREE LINE SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" DATE: 06/23/201 DRAWN BY: WGI 7L CHECKED BY: PROJECT xxxxxxxx SHEET TITLE EXISTING LANDSCAPING N0. DATE: REVISION PLAN 1 9-2-16 Revise parking to match exist[n 2 9-6-16 Revise parking to match existing DRAWING NO. 3 12-20-16 Revise parking spaces 24, 25 & 26 A2 ax* TIM COLUMN SECTION AI SCALE, Y�"'I'-0' THIS DRAWING IS THEPROPERTYOF 04 DESIGN STUDIO$ LLC AND IS NOT TORE COPIED, REPRODUCED, OR THE CONTENT THEREOF USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STEVE GUILD �t—�e OVERFtt\WG 48 Tl- RAITIR Fp] BKACKrr IF SCALE, AS WM DATE, 06124/1. DRAWN DY. WW CH®GGip neaecT, NEW SNORTER WINDOW® k_4 11_0 TYF. SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE, Y4".I'-O" ahk"! aDesign Studios 77 College Street, Ste. xA Surllnoon, VTO5401 (P)002-497-0095 (F)002-861-3110 04despSUMios.cnn 1J EXISTING SIDING WLpS THAT STING ABOVE PILLSBURY MANOR RE -DESIGN OF ENTRANCE CANOPY SOUTH DURLINGTON, VERPIONT STANDING BEAM-� DECORATIVE WOODEN BxS TINDER ERACKET SEAM BER i STONE VENEER WITH STONEAT COLUMN S2'-0"NEw k�CIOLUMN STONE (� SECTION OVow" FLAN77K JUN 3 0 2C"i Cit+1 of So. Budinc,4-,n CANOPY RE -DESIGN WOOD IROOVE FINE &S 1 KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc, September 17, 2008 Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Pillsbury South 20 Harbor View Road (#SP-08-74) Dear Ray, 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 Please find enclosed a revised site plan for Pillsbury South on Harbor View Road. A bicycle rack and snow storage area was added to the plan as requested. Thank you for you assistance. Do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or comments. Since Timothy J. Blais TJB/hig Attached: Plan sheet (3 full)(1 — 11 x 17) CC: Bill Spaulding Dean Dennis 07211: ltr to ray belair 9-17-08 I �� I Drive ® Harbor View I to UrR°°te 7 tl Shelburne Rood x191.42 Anf t \ I e Zp' drainage EasemhBurlhRr �.-1 0 bike rock \ to the City P .5 �\ APP10ximote loco -ntoin Power --�1 } rapose \ \ now NYNEXi � I yxf \Vdume 6f2I9B3 100 \-=O',ENew England elT �hOne� \ \f / nuory \ \\ I X\ — —� I I \, � \. 20 \ \ I \\ \\ I Porch \ t New Handicap Romp with Railings) I I\ II 0 i II piiiSbubomcn p// 20 rive New- rW7deAspha Mdewa& I I \ Existing Building Area = 2.53 Acres Lots 7&8 Porch �\ \ Lot 7 \ r vj 00 `\11 Conner50 Zone tan ne ton 50'Zone serwti Con \ \on I \\ �19' S'deyo; setback \ \ porch \ ss Existing Building / � I 3 e,. sleewdk CB # —mow —mow w w � \O sww~ paroVdxui a 58 m212page 19857v 6, January —� — Pane iound to neeUfbe, me Ptwn er!p Ween /orndm °as2. I vme 339 (B ra /PJl �-14 82'40'J1 w p aml ry N e7501T \ i \ 30' Bockyer set — —� Rood. Inc. I PJ J p',.°°' mane Ninety Shelburne Sixteen page 195 20' I _----------_ vorome 130 sewer`°,r'sa. I hn Larkin, In _ -- -------------------------- 13 - _ ,Va°n 24, run Jo 5 B2 4015 £ e°n0.76PSEe;M dum.l John Larkin, Inc. set. ro 1J5/9 443 Vdume 397 Poge Aueaet /9 199a Location Mop Not to sca/e .6' 5' 1 6'. T 2-1/2' Bit. conc, 1- r)pe IV - top see Site Pion for adjacent materiol. wide grove/ wider 1-1/2Ape /V - base (I.e. 4' topsoil, paving, concrete) Well 500" or 10' thick crushed g—W approved equal. subbase (704.05, fl—) Undisturbed earth or approved rdl material compacted to 95X standard proctor in 12' lifts. Typical Asphalt Walk Detail N. rS 0' 20' 40, 80, 120' Bor Scale 1' = V, �� Approx. Property Line w Power pate —w— -- -- M-W-- Existing Niter Line/gate w/se -I L2 Surrey Contrd Point srorember /7 2008 bate rack sn . stwoge a at. nws De t/m cnsoted bete NO te$ a — W G Existing Cos Line U Existing hydrant 1. Zhis plan was camphed using topographic survey data Existing tree ine o Connote monument Design W/V Site Plan tram red work complete in 1990 —s— — —5�- Existing Sewer Line/manhole O 1� pip. PP Drawn NKP/T./B 2 Limited existing conditions /nf—ation is from a site visit in loe 200E —ewr— — ecF-- Existing electr/cel/telephone ^ Drainage flow Checked S cale 10 = 20• P111sb Manor completed ,A -1—♦Existing Storm Line%atch basin �r 4 Sign ury 3 This plan is not o boundary surrey. Sea plan entitled Date Aug. 5, 200B it/to/AC-W Surrey, Boundary Survey, P///sbury Manor '►' Bui/d'ng mounted tight Pro' ct 07211 1 Harbor View Rood South Budn ton Ve South" 90101 for boundary infarmotion. d'RSBS d' I.,fNSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. y Light post 164 df¢in Stree4 Colchester, lrermont 05448 Permit Number SP- d6 - CITY OF SOUTH BUFLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) John Larkin Inc., 410 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403, #864-7444 Fax 864-0649 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Bill Spaulding, 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Bill Spaulding 20 Harbor View Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 phone: 863-7897 a. Contact e-mail address: 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 20 Harbor View Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 078-0020 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Construct new handicapped access walk and ramp. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Elderly care facility c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) _ Elderly care facility d. Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 21,012 sf e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) N/A f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): N/A h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): N/A I 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 110,222 Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing 19.06 % / 21,012 sq. ft. Proposed 19.06 % / 21,012 sq. ft. b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 37.57 % / 41,414 sq. ft. Proposed 38.20 % / 42,101 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 6.88 % / 1039 sq. ft. Proposed 7.18 % / 1085 sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 2,000 sf * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (Including interior renovations): $ 0 b) Landscaping: $ 0 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) $10,000.001: for handicapped ramp and sidewalk. 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) N/A b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) N/A c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) N/A 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N/A 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE N/A 14) ABUTTERS (Please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) N/A 2 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. NATURE 01' APPLICANT GRATU` E OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line • NAM DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete,/ Ainriete, r of Planking & Zoning or Designee 5 Me* KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. August 6, 2008 Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Pillsbury South 20 Harbor View Road Dear Ray, 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 Please find enclosed a minor amendment site plan application for Pillsbury South on Harbor View Road. The applicant is proposing to install a handicapped access ramp to the existing building. The revised lot coverage calculations are as follows: Overall lot size = 110,222 sf = 2.53 acres Building lot coverage = 21,012 sf = 19.06% (40% max.) 110,222 sf Overall lot coverage = 21,012 sf + 21,Q89 sf = 38.20% (70% max.) 110,222 sf Front yard coverage: (30' setback) Area = 15,101 sf Impervious area = 1084 sf = 7.18% = proposed front yard coverage. Thank you for you assistance. Please call if you have any questions or comments. Sin rely, �-- Timothy J. Blais TJB/hig Attached: Plan sheet (3 full)(1 — 11 x 17) Application Fee - $86.00 CC: Bill Spaulding 07211: Itr to ray belair /Votes 1. 77- plan was co nplfed using topographic survey dot. from Tield work complete in 1990. 2. Lknited existing conditions information is *cn, a site visit completed in ,Mne 100E .S 7his plan is not a boundary sunny See plop entitled Alto/ACSM Surrey, Boundary Sunry, Pilfsbu y Manor South" 90101 far boundary information. Leaend Approx. Property Lme w --W ---- q�w Existing Water Line/gate w/ve - - G -- -X G Existng Cos Line Existing tree Line —S— — —Exfstkg Sewer Line/manholv per— —err-- Exfstkg Nectrfco//telephone Existing Stark LineAwtch bask Power pole Survey Castro/ Paint Exishng hydrant Concrete monument /,on ppe Orah—ge flow S%9n Buddhg mounted light Light past Location Mop Not to stole 6' S' 6' See Site P/on fw 2-1/2' Bft. cant. odfacant material. wide grove/ 1' Tjpe /V - top (:e. 4' topsoil, u/dar 1-1/2' Type /V -boss paving, concrete) Mirofl 500x, or J r0' thick crushed grewd approved equal subbase (70405, ffne) Undisturbed earth or approved fil/ moterid cornpocted to 95X standard proctor n 12' lifts Typical Asphalt Walk Detail N T. S 0' 20' 40' 80' 121' Bar Scale = 20' (Mfe reMarE Design K A( Site P/an Drawn NKP/7,A9 Checked Scale I' = 20' Pill sb ur)l Manor or Date Aug,_ 5, 2006 Z",&S & ZA&SINC Consulting A'ngineers, Inc. 164t A(ain Stree4 ColcAester, Ve7mont 0".Af 1 1 7 theQther Paper • otherpapervt.com • July 24, 2014 • 15 _ ..__.__. _�. ............ _...__..._..._....� _.___._..___ .._..__........ __._.....__..___.__.. �_._...___._ ._._._..._. ssifieds - Pu'1311'c Notices, 'oorPitifulPearlDoll 17" Circa LUGGAGE: Various sizes $1--$4 per PUBLIC HEARING 56's. Very good condition. available. $40 or best offer, piece. 802- 999-0625. (07/17) SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1-2877. (07/24) MICROWAVE: GE 1100watt 1.1 cu.ft. counter -top model. Like new, used 1 The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public WFAN•Inexcellent condition, year. Paid $110. Great buy, $75. 802 hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575, ierfectly. Two. 7 inch blades, 862-8084. (07/24) Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on August 19, 2014 at 7:00 lyreversible, two Speeds: Fits P. M. to consider the following: derandpull-up windows. $15.. MOVING: Selling Kenmore side by '-9308. (07/24) side black refrigerator; with ice, 1.`Conditional use application #CU-14 08 of David T. Austin for the crushedice andwater in door, $1,000 - installation of erosion control measures ° (sloPe stabilization) and TURE: Maple -end table, 2 OBO. Also-2-Sterling stairlifts, 950 water oriented development (stairs to lake), 58 Bartlett Bay Road. - 2th 1 drawer: 21 112" W x 281/2" series. Each comes with short rail and 102-863-3779:107/17) . long rail and two remote controls. 2 Conditional use application #CU-14-09 & site plan application $1,500 each or $2,000 for both. 802- #SP-14-36 of William Spaulding to amend a previously approved TURE: Twin mattress set, 6587-1651. (07/24) 21,01`2 sq. ft. 62 unit congregate care facility. The amendment carved wood sofa and chair, consists of expanding the canopy entrance from 145 sq ft to 345 h. tufted mint greenback, chair MOVING SALE: Char -broil grill with sq. ft., 20 Harbor View Road. edle point seat. contact 802- cover and cleaning items and propane 4.(07/10) bottle, $50. Glass top dining table with TimBarritt Chair TURE:. Victorian style couch, 4 chairs and serving table, $150. 802- 863-7096. (07/24) South Burlington Development Review Board'r ining table and 4 chairs, $200;0 size bed with mattress, $200; PAINT:. Woodscapes exterior house v Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the ith propane gas tanks; $80. stain; 4-5 gallons (3/1 gal cans and South Burlington City Hall. Participation in the local proceeding Is a I-1387. 1/2 of a 5 gal bucket); mixed in June prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal. "(07/24) 2014. $20 per gal or $75 for all. 802- Cedar Hope Chest 45x19, 863-6299. (07/24) July 24, 2014 tique Gold Frame Oval Mirror, 30. 802-497-1343. (07/24) pATIU SET. 5 pc. white wicker - resin - `. outdoor patio set. Includes 48" round WEIGHT BENCH: Weider 140 Weight 6 gallons Behr paint. Self table with 4 arm chairs . Excellent Bench Combo. $40. 802- 864-0813. semi -gloss enamel. 5 gal light condition. $265.802-863-0083 (07/10) (07/10) ;al darkblue. Bought last sum- ver opened, $10/gal. Nordic- SEWING MACHINE: Table modelwith u a ° KP 1000 S treadmill. Used for carrying case good condition lightly Excellentconditlonw/original used $15.802- 999-0625. (.07/17) 2005 DODGE NEON:4 door automat- ianual. It's heavy and needs ic, sunroof,154,720 miles, inspected. . moved from the. basement, 1 SPEAKERS:1IWo Acoustic Linear Sys- $1,200. 802-343-4838. (07/24) $50.802-864-3353. (07/17) tems speakers, 27H,15W,11D inches; Model 520, liquid cooled, 5-200 .2011 CHEW CRUZE 1LT. ICE blue Sunbeam 5 speed Mixmaster, watts; Freq response 43Hz to 25Khz,, metallic. In excellent condition. Only ss pitcher, $8; 4 R Lauren pit- 8 ohms Imp.High & Mid Frequency 17,151 miles. 1.41iter engine 6 speed xcellent condition, $2 each; Control.l2"Woofer,51/2"Mid range, automatic. Car starter, blue tooth, astic decorative top, 12 x15, plus Tweeter, excellent condition $75 cruise control, USB audio interface, !-658-1636 (07/10) OBO.802-660-8586. (07/17) E.m lovment �r Job Fair People? Love to Travel? 'assenger & Airbrake Endorsements? steering wheel controls. $13,400.802- 922-6309.(07/10) 2006 VOLVO XC70 WAGON: 109K, deluxe model, leather seats, moon roof, beautiful condition. $12,500, OBO.802-951-9154 (07/10) 2006 HYUNDAI ELANTRA: Great commuter car. Perfect for a high school or college student. 4 Cylinder, Automatic, power windows. Just inspected. Many items replaced in the past year: Struts, sway bar, head gasket, radiator, battery, and 4 snow tires. $2,975.802-578-6022. (07/10) Come GROW with us M low ali Has Immediate Openings... ]ra] znr&inri OYr`c nfl(lnnI 1 11 A Tag Tlz" �r"T0� T.'' -� -�- WO, SOuthburlin ton PLANNING & ZONING February 10, 2009 Bill Spaulding 20 Harbor View Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Expiration of Site Plan Approval #SP-08-74 Dear Mr. Spaulding: Please be advised that Site Plan Approval #SP-08-74, issued on August 7, 2008 to construct a handicapped ramp and walkway has expired. This approval has expired due to not obtaining a zoning permit for this project within six (6) months, as required by condition #4 of said decision. Should you wish to proceed with this project, you must reapply for approval. Sincere !� r l� Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com r� r State of Vermont N 1 All Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist October 16, 1996 John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Larkin: Subject: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Phone #(802) 879-6563 We have received a completion inspection letter dated September 19, 1996 from Mike Crete, Yankee Plumbing & Heating, Inc., regarding the connection of the interior plumbing to the sanitary sewer designed by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. This hereby satisfies conditions No. 8 and 9 of the above subject Public Building Permit. Thank you for your close attention to the permit conditions. Please contact this office should you have any questions. Sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c For the Record City of South Burlington Gravel & Shea, Attorneys at Law Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineer, Inc. Yankee Plumbing & Heating, Inc. _ _ r PLANNING COMMISSION 10 NOVEMBER 1987 PAGE 2 3. Site plan application of LTH Associates for construction of a 39,000 sq. ft., 47 unit community care facility on lots 7 and 8, 20 Harbor View Road Mr. Olsen explained the facility will be similar- to Pillsbury Manor with 30 community care rooms and 17 residential suites in 2 wings. In between will be the dining room, living room, activity rooms, etc. It will be a Level 3 nursing care facility, not a nursing home as such. The main entry is behind the building. Landscaping will complement what is there, i.e. pines, birches, etc. The building will be 2 story, wood frame with wood siding, very residential in character. They received a conditional use permit from the Zoning Board. The applicant feels this is probably the least - impact commercial use that could go on this site. Mrs. Maher questioned usable outdoor walking space for the residents. Mr. Olsen said the site slopes gently and is very walkable. A sidewalk was suggested Cjo people can cross and walk up to Harbor Heights. Mrs. Hurd asked if the entrance lines up with the hotel across the road. Mr. Olsen said it does not. Regarding sight distance, Mr. Olsen said the hill doesn't start till further back, so that shouldn't be a problem. Mrs. Hurd asked why only 3 handicapped parking spaces. Mrs. Spalding said very few residents have cars, probably only 1 or 2. The facility provides transportation to doctors, etc. The 28 regular spaces would also serve residents in the residential wing who do have more cars. Ms. Pugh noted the Zoning Minutes say 31 parking spaces. Mr. Olsen said 3 spaces were lo-';t to widening the drive to meet the requirements of the Fire Chief. Mrs. Lafleur suggested perhaps not putting in all the parking and seeing if it is needed. The applicant has already changed from a 6" to 8" water main to meet the City Engineer's request. The sidewalk will be 5 feet wide. Mrs. Lafleur noted they will have to have a study by Heindel and Noyse. Mr. Olsen noted there will be buffer of 6'-8' white pines on the eastern property line. David Spitz noted that traffic is way below the 125 cars that would be allowed in the peak hour. He estimates only 22. Harbor View/Shelburne Rds. still does not meet the signal re- quirements. He noted that a signal is planned in 1988 at Allen Rd. which will provide some gaps at this location. The Shelburne Rd. widening is not in the 5 year plan although right-of-way planning is scheduled for 1989. The concept is for a 4-lane road with a barrier, not a 5-lane road. Mrs. Lafleur noted that Craig Leiner agrees with trip generation rates and feels the Allen Rd. signal will help. He felt he PLANNING COMMISSION 10 NOVEMBER 1987 PAGE 3 needed more information before deciding on the need for a Harbor View Rd. signal. He agrees a right turn lane is needed onto Shelburne Rd. and should be built by this de- veloper. Mr. Leiner was concerned with the fact that the 2 southbound lanes on Shelburne Rd. weren't planned until 1992. Mr. Spitz said a signal is still not warranted with only 1 lane. Mr. Spitz said he did assume a right turn lane onto Shelburn Rd. when he did his study. Mrs. Hurd moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of LTH for construction of a 2 story, 39,000 sq. ft. community care facility on Lots 7 & 8- Harbor View Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Harbor Community Care Center: Site Plan" prepared �2y J. Graham Goldsmith Architects, dated 11/2/87 with the following stipulations: 1. A $22,000 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. 2. A bond shall be posted for the sidewalk along the frontage prior to permit. The amount of the bond shall be determined by the City Engineer. The sidewalk shall be 5 feet in width, concrete, continuous across the driveway, and constructed one foot from the property line. Handicapped curbs and ramps at a location approved �2y the City shall shall be shown. 3. A � gpd sewer allocation is made and the $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. 4. A right turn lane on west bound Harbor View Rd. shall be constructed bv the applicant. The design shall be approved the City Engineer prior to permit. A bond shall be posted prior to permit in an amount determined by the City Engineer. 5. An evaluation 12y Heindel & Noyse shall be completed at the applicant's expense. It shall be submitted to the City En- gineer for approval prior to permit and the recommendations for erosion control and storm water runoff shall be followed. 6. A $565. contribution toward the Shelburne Rd. intersection improvement fund shall be paid prior to permit based on the 22 peak hour trip ends generated 12y this development. 7. An evaluation of the water requirements shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to permit to determine whether an 8 inch line is necessary. 8. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. PLANNING COMMISSION 10 NOVEMBER 1987 PAGE 4 Mr. Burgess seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Other Business Members agreed to meet for a site visit to the Milot/Larkin subdivision on 11/21 and will also visit the Howard Johnson project at the same time. The City Council has asked the Planning Commission to come up with priorities for intersectioji,,,and capital improvements. Money has been collected fort^Phes6. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:35. Clerk H Wagner, Hendel, and Noyes, Inc. consulting geologists V 1\1N T �4 P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820 BARTLETT BROOK/HARBOR VIEW COMMUNITY CARE CENTER ANALYSIS OF HYDROLOGIC IMPACT SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Prepared By: Jeffrey A. Nelson January 19, 1988 1. The proposed site plan for the Harbor View Community Care Center (lots 7 and 8 Harbor View Road), prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers Inc., and dated November 1987 has been reviewed. 2. Several options have been examined to minimize the increase in peak discharge in Bartlett Brook resulting from this building. Additionally, the issue of stormwater quality has been reviewed. 3. The option which results in the least impact on peak flow rates in Bartlett Brook relies upon the following drainage control. 2 a) All roof drainage collected and piped directly to storm drain system on Harbor View Road. b) Drainage from easterly portion of parking area and entryway be directed to grass areas along northern edge of lot. This overland flow of stormwater over grassy terrain will maximize removal of particulate material as well as oils and greases. c) Drainage from the remainder of paved areas is to be directed to a 4,000 gallon tank to be located beneath the island in the parking lot. The purpose of this structure is primarily for stormwater treatment, as it is too small to provide significant reduction in peak discharge. Outflow from this structure is to be directed to the south and discharged at Bartlett Brook just south of the property. 4) With this drainage plan in place, the following peak flows are projected. Peak Discharge From Site Peak Discharge In Barlett Brook PRE -DEVELOPMENT 5.69 cfs 162.80 POST -DEVELOPMENT 9.41 cfs 163.21 3 5) Numerous retention options were investigated, but given the timing of peak discharge from the site (around 11.97 hours), which is much earlier than the peak of the overall watershed at this location (12.44 hours), it would be necessary to store a prohibitively large volume of water in order to delay the peak from the site until after the peak from the watershed passed. Therefore, the approach which has been utilized has been to allow the peak discharge from the site to occur as early as possible within the design storm event, in order that it still occurs well before the peak from the remainder of the watershed. In this way, there is little or no increase to peak discharge in the stream itself, even though there is an increase in the rate of peak discharge from the site. 6) Given the proximity of the site to the stream, strict erosion control measures should be implemented during the construction of the building. SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH ' A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION-' STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION! AREA #b COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION! TIME RATE RATE '.SQ MI) (HR) (HR) MINI (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 98- 12.24 223.97 871.5 STRUCTURE 1 RESVOR .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 229.34 13.52 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 1 REACH .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 210.98 13.60 < 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 2 RUNOFF .083 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .98 .88- 12.24 36.52 440.0 XSECTION 3 ADDHYD .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 206.26 12.25 67.39 198.2 - XSECTION REACH .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 196.74 12.37 61;.48 192. STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 .89- 12.32 53.11 303.5 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOR .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 925.84 12.32 56.20 321.1 XSECTION 4 REACH .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .80 191.83 12.42 56.10 320.6 STRUCTURE 3 ADDHYD .515 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 .08- 12.41 120.93 234.8 STRUCTURE 3 RESVOR .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 .86- 12.41 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 6 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 192.24 12.51 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 7 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 147.96 12.61 120.04 233.1 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF 2 2 4.00 24.00 1.40 12.15 88.95 808.6 XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .110 .625 2 2 .10 .10 .0 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 .0@- 148.12 12.59 147.19 239.5 STRUCTURE 4 RESVOR .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 150.38 12.67 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 REACH .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 133.22 12.77 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF .006 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.86 .88- 11.96 11.49 1915.5 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .631 2 2 4.00 24.00 1.35 133.22 12.77 140.11 222.1 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .259 2 2 .10 .10 .0 .0 4.00 24.00 1.74 .88- 12.44 162.24 626.4 XSECTION 20 RUNOFF .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.31 .88- 11.97 5.69 s%Tl- 1323.6 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .263 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.73 214.23 12.44 162.89ezowk. 618.7 XSECTION 10 RUNOFF ..050 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.27 .88- 12.25 29.72 594. XSECTION 11 ADDHYD .313 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.66 202.72 12.41 186.37 594. XSECTION 12 REACH .313 2 2 .10 .0 •#.00 24.00 1.66 146.88 12.51 186.37 594.1/ STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .009 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.98 .89- 11.97 16.99 1917.9 ' STRUCTURE 13 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.30 .8A- 11.96 7.21 2327.4 STRUCTURE 13 RESVOR .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.38 199.43 12.00 5.49 1772.2 XSECTION 18 ADDHYD .012 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.08 207.61 11.97 22.31 1875.0 ' XSECTION 18 REACH .012 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.11 207.61 12.07 22.31 1874.9 STRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.53 .98- 11.96 6.46 2514.8 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .014 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.18 145.94 12.03 25.21 1742.3 S7(� EV F C.C.1 P M!_A1T" twJ� �{ v V v A-(-- T A AIV- SUMMARY TABLE I. - SELECTED RESULTS OF STAF0ARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP H'YDROGRAPH A OUESTION MARK(?! INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA it COND INCREM BEGIN (:MOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TI11E PATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 ' STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 .88- 12.24 223.97 871.5 STRUCTURE 1 RESVOR .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 229.34 13.52 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 1 REACH 257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 210.98 13.60 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 2 RUNOFF .983 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .98 .89- 12.24 36.52 440.0 XSECTION 3 ADDHYD .340 2 _ 10 0 4.00 24.00 1.01 206.26 12.25 67.39 198. XSECTION 5 REACH .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 196.74 12.37 65.48 192.e STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 .88- 12.32 53.11 303.5 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOR .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 925.84 12.32 56.20 321.1 XSECTION 4 REACH .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .80 191.63 12.42 56.10 320.6 STRUCTURE 3 ADDHYD .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 A8- 12.41 120.93 234.8 STRUCTURE 3 RESVOR .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 88- 12.41 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 6 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 192.24 12.51 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 7 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 147.96 12.61 120.04 233.1 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF .110 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.40 .88- 12.15 88.95 808.6 XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 148.12 12.59 147.19 235.5 STRUCTURE 4 RESUOR .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 150.38 12.67 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 REACH .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 133.22 12.77 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF .006 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.86 .88- 11.96 11.49 1915.5 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .631 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 133.22 12.77 140.11 222.1 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .259 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.74 .88- 12.44 162.24 626.4 STRUCTURE 15 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.56 .88- 11.96 2.76 A 2511.2 STRUCTURE 15 RESVOR 001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.61 223.18 11.98 2.59T0. 2358,f"N XSECTION 20 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.15 .88- 11.96 2.76 0 1973 ` XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .003 2 2 .10 .0 •i.00 24.00' 2.36 211.40 11.98 5.36 2142.o XSECTION 20 RUNOFF .000 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.B9 .88- 12.00 .69 c, 1871.9 } XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.30 211.46 11.97 6.09 2123.0 XSECTION 20 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.46 .88- 12.00 1.04 D 1489.7 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.13 211.54 11.97 7.19 2015.0 �^ XSECTION 20 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.76 .88- 11.95 2.25Roocs 3126.2 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.41 211.72 11.97 9.41simTw -2194.E XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .263 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.75 214.23 12.44 163.21 da,ok 619.9 XSECTION 19 RUNOFF .050 2 2 .10 .0 1.00 24.00 1.27 .88- 12.25 2Q.72 594.4 PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 December 3, 1987 John Larkin L.T.H. Associates 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Larkin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you 113ve any questions please call me. Sincerely, Jane B . Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encl PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 November 25, 1987 John Larkin L.T.H. Associates 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Community Care Facility, Lots 7 & 8, Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Larkin: Enclosed are the November 10, 1987 Planning Commission minutes. We must get together soon to determine the location of the handicapped accessible curbs and ramps. Please have your architects call me to discuss this at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, jl�o-d _. , wl- Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner 1 Encl cc: Susan Dimmick Memorandum - Pland November 6, 1987 Page 2 Traffic: The half acre lot is permitted 9 trip ends under the traffic overlay zone. The use will generate 165 to 72 trip ends using David Spitz previous traffic study which are based on VAOT data at the high side and ITE estimates on the low side. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's u-mments. 3) BARNIER, 15 BERARD DRIVE Mr. Barnier proposes to construct a 20' x 42' addition to the existing building at 15 Berard Drive for an expansion to the metal truck terminal. The property is zone Industrial -Commercial for this 30,400 square foot lot. Access: Access will not change from the existing 29 foot wide driveway. Circulation and Parking: are wide required. The plans aisles. An eleven space parking lot is shown; 8 show adequate circulation with 54 foot Landscaping: The $6000 addition requires $180 in new land- scaping. The site has some landscaping in the front lawn but could use an additional large tree or two. Building coverage is 7.7% and total coverage is 49.9%. The rear of the property could be cleaned up a bit. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. 4) BLODGETT ZONE CHANGE This public hearing has been rescheduled for November 24, 1987 due to an error in the public warning notice. 5)` LARKIN, COMMUNITY CARE FACILITY, 20 HARBOR VIEW ROAD John Larkin proposes to construct a 2 story, 39,000 square foot total Community Care facility on a 2.5 a -re parcel (lots #7 and 8) on Harbor View Road. The facility will have 30 community care units and 17 efficiency apartments. The property is zoned Commercial -Two and this is a conditional use that received ZBA approval on October 19, 1987. (ZBA minutes enclosed) Access: Access is shown from a 30 foot wide curb cut on the eastern most end of the property. A sidewalk is shown along the frontage and to the front porch as well as to the interior doors of the building. The original subdivision approval noted "the need for sidewalks on the southside of the commercial road shall 2 Memorandum - Planr( November 6, 1987 Page 3 be reviewed and required if needed, at the time of application for development of individual lots". Circulation: A 30 foot wide circulation drive serves the building and parking area. A circular driveway serves the main entry which is located in the interior of the building. Parking: Twenty eight parking spaces are shown including 4 handicapped spaces. The zoning ordinance provision for "hospi- tals, sanitariums, rest and convalescent homes and all similar institutions" requires 1 space for every 4 beds plus 1 for each staff or visiting doctor plus 1 for each 4 employees. Under this standard, the center will require 20 spaces. Landscaping: A $22,000 landscaping bond and plan is required."V_ The plans show landscaping valued at this amount and is a good loy, ' mixture of hardwood and evergreen. ° 41A Erosion Control and Drainage: An evaluation by Heindel & Noyse is required prior to permit. The Commission can wait to see that evaluation or approve the plan pending a review by the City Engineer and compliance by the applicant. Sewer: There appears to be approximately 16,000 gpd left at the treatment plant. This project requires 7050 gallons per day and the $2.50 per gallon fee must be paid prior to permit. Traffic: Enclosed is a traffic study from David Spitz. He concludes that no signal is warranted, delays will be very long and a separate right turn and left turn lane should be con- structed at Harbor View Road. He has assumed there will be 4 lanes on Route 7 in 1992. Left turns will operate at level o service E in 1987 and 1992. 1 suggest that the signal warrants be reevaluated assuming only one northbound and one southbound lane on Route 7 in 1992 since it is unlikely it will be widened before then. The original study for this subdivision done by Bob Krebs stated that a signal will be needed at harbor View and Route 7 and separate left turn lanes on Harbor View and Route 7 will be needed until the South Burlington Southern Connector is built. Craig Leiner's comments will be available at the meeting. Other: See Bill. Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. C 6 CITY OF souTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) - _101.4--i 6) PROPOSED USE � 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor)--Q,- ts" 0 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9) LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas % c--e- ___ ___- -*Q-Q- building, parking., outside storage ....... % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ Landscaping Other Sit.p 11TIprovements (please list with cost) $ 11) ESTIMATED FIROJFICT COMP1.1-I'TION DATE: 12) ESTIM?\'H--D AV]"-'RAG1-'. DAILY TRAFFIC (in anti out) 1-..-;t im.-tto-d trip ends ( in and out.) durin!, the o 1-1, 1 a.% 1 1) rollLth 1: 1 - i d a Y 1 1 12' 1-2 p.m. a- I 1). fit. -1-5 P.M. 1).111. 13) 1)kA1%' 11(111P�� C*' DAI M. Si:BN:tiff j()-.\ /(/jojj-7 J)A , )I. I G N. \'I'(: R I.. PLEASE SUBMIT FOUR COPIES OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible.) Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. ( This requires separate Ptanniog Commission approval). Number and .location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces) Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot #). North arrow. Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. H WVN Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. consulting geologists W N P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820 November 13, 1987 Mr. John Larkin LTH Associates 1165 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear John: We have received a site plan from Krebs & Lansing entitled "Bartlett Property Commercial Lots #7 & #8." Since this parcel lies within the Bartlett Brook watershed, the South Burlington Planning Commission requires that a hydrologic analysis of stormwater runoff from the site be performed. A computer model and data file have been set up which represent the entire Bartlett Brook watershed. In order to input the pertinent site data, assess stormwater runoff conditions, and recommend measures as needed for mitigation of impact on peak stormwater discharge, our estimated fees are $750. Upon receipt of a check in that amount, our office will initiate work on the project. Completion of the work will be made within two weeks of that date. Please contact me with any questions. nc rely, '4 Jeffrey . Nelson, Geologist Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. JAN:tac cc: Jane Lafleur` Bill Nedde MOTION OF APPROVAL 11/9/87 JBL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the ,site plan application of LTH for construction of a two story, 39,000 square foot community care facility on Lots 7 and 8, Harbor View Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Harbor Community Care Center: Site Plan" prepared by J. Graham Goldsmith Architects, dated 11/2/87 with the following stipulations: 1. A $22,000 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. 2. A bond shall be posted for the sidewalk along the frontage prior to permit. The amount of the bond shall be determined by the City Engineer. The sidewalk shall be 5 feet in width, concrete, continuous across the driveway and constructed one foot from the property line. ��nkh""A n 3. A 7050 gallon per day sewer allocation is made and the $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. 4. A right -turn lane on west bound Harbor View Road shall be constructed by the applicant. The design shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to permit. A bond shall be posted prior to permit in an amount determined by the City Engineer. 5. An evaluation by Heindel and Noyse shall be completed at the applicant's expense. It shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to permit and the recommendations for erosion control and storm water runoff shall be followed. 6. A comple engin��ing siggant's rant study shall bee,mitted to the C'Z�aed� for to,..t de r.mine�er a signal is nee dt 7/Ha ornters� If needed, it sha be lle app expense. A $ 5(P6. contribution toward the Shelburne Road intersection improvement fund shall be paid prior to permit based on the�;��` trip ends generated by this development. () A An evaluation of the water requirements shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to permit to determine whether an 8 inch line is necessary. () A. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this _VV approval is null and void. 3 MOTION OF APPROVAL 11/9/87 JBL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of LTH for construction of a two story, 39,000 square foot community care facility on Lots 7 and 8, Harbor View Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Harbor Community Care Center: Site Plan" prepared by J. Graham Goldsmith Architects, dated 11/2/87 with the following stipulations: 1. A $22,000 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. 2. A bond shall be posted for the sidewalk along the frontage prior to permit. The amount of the bond shall be determined by the City Engineer. The sidewalk shall be 5 feet in width, concrete, continuous across the driveway and constructed one foot from the property line. 3. A 7050 gallon per day sewer allocation is made and the $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. 4. A right -turn lane on west bound Harbor View Road shall be constructed by the applicant. The design shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to permit. A bond shall be posted prior to permit in an amount determined by the City Engineer. 5. An evaluation by Heindel and Noyse shall be completed at the applicant's expense. It shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to permit and the recommendations for erosion control and storm water runoff shall be followed. 6. A complete engineering signal warrant study shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit to determine whether a signal is needed at the Rte 7/Harbor View intersection. If needed, it shall be installed at the applicant's expense. 7. A $ 5(D6. contribution toward the Shelburne Road intersection improvement fund shall be paid prior to permit based on theg� Pecz�ha�l` trip ends generated by this development. 8. An evaluation of the water requirements shall be submitted to the CitJT Engineer ito � � t determine L tL n prior ivr .,v per 11111. U %Al.i wile l.11ei t1 I1 O 1i11:l1 line is necessary. 9. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. am * P"` - �. \NA .Wo - ,JoLA. s "TU t_�rS. � IM. V v�vrne W�wthn'�� 1� rR-C. 5 ig�-•�. CI -MIN r,..t �s 'at L Lau- , �ktAii 0,6simay 6*, . oar r �P�ll von 4' �sk a - of . —Qum (ov) i Ott L em I\P- J k C(Igo) .7 NOR11 IC UMMY T14 �` IT T w` IT� j _ 15 Morse Drive t.' 1 ill 1 �l°"`�"" Essex Jct., Vermont 05452 (802) 878-0305 n Ta October 29, 1987 John Larkin LTH Associates, Inc. 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear John, Enclosed is a report on traffic impacts from your proposed retirement facility on Harbor View Road. The report estimates peak hour and average weekday volumes for the facility. It also evaluates impacts at the Route 7/Harbor View intersection. As required by Act 250, cumulative development traffic volumes are as follows: TRIP GENERATIONS TOTALS - "BARTLETT PROPERTY" A.M. Peak Hour Enter Exit Total P.M. Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Average Weekday Previously Approved* Retirement Development Facility 212 2 138 7 350 9 169 10 198 12 367 22 3730 161 *Includes 53 single-family and duplex units, 89 multi -family units, 3 mixed commercial buildings, a 200 room hotel and restaurant, and 1 office building (approved by South Burlington but not by DEC #4). The portion of the above traffic that will pass through the Route,7/ Harbor View Road intersection is given on page A-2. The updated analysis of the intersection produces identical conclusions to the previous report by North Country Planning, dated September 8, 1986. * Signalization of the intersection is not warranted. * Left -turning vehicles from Harbor View Road will experience very long delays during peak periods. Page 2 * The "throat" of the Harbor View approach to the intersection should be widened to facilitate exiting right turns. I will be happy to provide any additional information that may be needed. iS:e,re1y., C David H. Spitz cc: Peter Olesen Enclosure DHS/cc No r th COu nt ry l lanni_ng • 1 �51� Ic�r ;Se I)i-ive • I �►ti� Y � lit., �'I�. Page A-1 October 29, 1987 I. Development Traffic Larkin Realty has indicated that the proposed development will consist of 17 units with living, dining, bedroom, kitchen and bath and 30 units with bedroom and bath. The smaller units are very similar to existing units at Pillsbury Manor. Traffic estimates are derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and from on -site counts at Pillsbury Manor. Peak hour trips are based on the number of beds (residents) in the facility. Pillsbury Manor currently has 28 residents in 24 units, an occupancy rate of just under 1.2 be�s per unit. The smaller units in the Harbor View facility should have a similar occupancy rate, and the larger units should have slightly higher rate. Occupancy Total Type of Unit Number Rate Beds Bedroom, bath only 30 1.2 36 Bedroom, bath and other 17 1.5 26 62 IT trrip rates for "nursing homes" produce the following traffic estimates. ITE Trip Rate Harbor View Traffic Time Period per bed 62 beds A.M. Peak Hour Enter .03 2 Exit .11 7 Total .14 9 P.M. Peak Hour Enter .16 10 Exit .20 12 Total .36 22 Average Weekday 2.60 .161 II. Area Traffic Previous development approvals have stipulated that traffic conditions at the Route 7/Harbor View Road intersection be monitored as the LTH development progresses. The most recent evaluation was provided in a report by North Country Planning dated September 8, 1986 for a proposed 20,000 square foot office building lot 9. This report uses the data North G m ltry 1 "Itui li I1g • 151� I()rsc I riNv • ES.Scx Jct., VIA. Page A-2 October 29, 1987 from the previous analysis with the following adjustments: * 1986 and 1991 Route 7 through volumes are increased at an annual rate of 1.023 percent to produce 1987 and 1992 design hour volumes. * Intersection p.m. turning movements are derived from an on - site count taken on October 21, 1987. * 80% of development is estimated to pass through the intersection with 75% traveling to/from the north and 25% to/fr,.om the south. 1987 and 1992 p.m. design hour volumes are given below with new development traffic underlined. 1987 P.M. DHV TURNING MOVEMENTS ROUTE 7/HARBOR VIEW ROAD Route 7 New Development Traffic is unrlorl i ncri 44 1289 6 �--- 60 + 7 IC` 21 + 3 941 12 + 2 1992 P.M. DHV TURNING MOVEMENTS ROUTE 7/HARBOR VIEW ROAD Route 7 New Development Traffic is undarl;nad 44 1444 6 4111. 1---- 60 + 7 �t-- 21 + 3 T 1054 12 2 Harbor View Road Harbor View Road North Gni ntry L'lanning • � �� i�t��ise Drive • I;��eti � lct.., VI' Page A-3 October 29, 1987 Capacity analyses are attached and summarized below. Results are unchanged from the previous report. With two lanes on Route 7 in 1987 and four lanes in 1992, all Route 7 through movements and turns into Harbor-liew Road will operate at level of service C or better. Until Route 7'is widened, right turns from Harbor View Road can operate at level of service C only if two existing lanes are provided. Under all conditions, left turn exits from Harbor View Road will operate at level of service E. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ROUTE 7/HARBOR VIEW ROAD Approach Turning Movement Time Period Level of Service Rt. 7, North Left 1987 P.M. B Harbor View Left E Harbor View Right C Rt. 7, North Left 1992 P.M. A Harbor View Left E Harbor View Right A N(>rdi Gnintry Plani1ing • 15 N1oi-,-,c Drive• I;,tiscx,Jct.AT. Page A-4 October 29, 1987 APPENDICES * Pillsbury Manor traffic count, October, 1987 * Route 7/Harbor View Road traffic count, October 21, 1987 * Unsignalized intersection analysis, 1987 PH DHV * Unsignalized intersection analysis, 1992 PM DHV �IOI'l11 -A llt.i'j' �l�illlllll • 15 l�Ic�rse I)rivc • I�,titiex �Jct., �'I'. 1530 Williston Rd. So. Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 863-2386 This tra.ffic pattern is recorded frorr October 1 to [Ir-t.nber 16, 1 ,0 . The following informa.tian is the nigh avid low range for - each time period during the creek.. 7 a.. m. to 10a. m. 10a. m. t.o. 3p. m. 3p. m. to 6p. m. ------------------------------------------------------------- isAR,:. IN - CARS OUT - 4 4:05 4: 10 4:15 4:20 4:25 4: 30 4: 35 4:40 4:45 4:50 4:55 5:00 Time: 4:05-5:05 p.m., Wednesday, October 21, 1987 Location: Harbor View Road at Shelburne Road, South Burlington Conditions: Chilly, Partly Cloudy From Shelburne Road Right Left Enter Enter 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 10 Totals: Enter 50 Exit 48 98 3 4 4 2 4 2 4 5 4 4 40 From Harbor View Road Left Right Exit Exit 5 2 4 1 2 1 2 4 1 7 1 1 3 2 2 3 1 6 13 35 To/F�om North 75 To/From South 23 98 North ('Antntry Planning • 15m(msc l)rivc• II',SScx,Tct., Vl'. � � 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR................................. 1 ' AREA POPULATION.................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..................... Harbor View Road NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET................... Route 7 NAME OF THE ANALYST.............................. D. Spitz DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 10/26/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. 1987 P.M. DHV INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION ' MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTA/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---� LEFT -- 24 0 50 THRU -- 0 941 1289 RIGHT -- 67 14 0 NUMBER OF LANES ' _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LANES -- 2 1 1 . ` ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Pape-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ----- ___ --- ________________ --- _________________ - WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 'N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV"S ___________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND --- _____________ --- _____________ --- WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ ________ ___________ -------------- MINOR RIGHTS WB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.20 5.20 0.00 5.20 ` MINOR LEFTS WB 7.10 7.10 0.00 7.10 ' ` CAPACITY AND LEVEL —OF —SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN— ACTUAL FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOS p M SH R' SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ----- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 26 75 69 69 RIGHT 74 295 295 295 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 55 419 419 419 42 E 221 C 364 B � 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR................................. 1 ' AREA POPULATION.................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..................... Harbor View Road NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET................... Route 7 NAME OF THE ANALYST.............................. D. Spitz DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 10/26/87 TIME PERIODANALYZED............................. 1992 P.M. DHV INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION ' MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTA/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB ---- ---- NB ---� SD LEFT -- 24 0 50 0 527 722 RIGHT -- 67 14 0 NUMBER OF LANES ' _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _____ _______ _______ LANES -- 2 2 2 ..^Nt".'=~'=^ / \ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Paqe-2 PERCENT RI8HT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRAM- ANGLE FOR RI8HT TURNS FOR RI8HT TURNS _______________ EASTBOUND ----- --- --- --- - WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 ,N NORTHBOUND- 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV"S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND --- --- --- WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 _ ' CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RlGHTS WB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MINOR LEFTS ' WB 7.60 7.60 0.00 7.60 CAPACITY AND LEVEL —OF —SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN— ACTUAL FLOW— TIAL. MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOS p M Sol R' SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ------ I MINOR STREET WB LEFT 26 96 91 91 65 E RIGHT 74 735 735 735 661 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 55 598 598 598 543 A PLANNER 658-7955 I City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 November 6, 1987 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Community Care Facility, 20 Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Larkin: Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission regarding your application. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 24, 1987 to represent ,your request. Sincerely, jal-�' a_- - Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls cc: Susan Dimick M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Planner Re: November 10, 1987 agenda items Date: November 6, 1987 2) MOBIL CORPORATION, WILLISTON ROAD 1. Just completed curb and sidewalk work along Williston Road should not be disturbed. Plan shows two 5 foot curb radii changed to 15 foot. This change will not discourage left turns and is not worth removal of new paving and resulting in a patch. 2. Plan is a significant improvement over what presently exists on the site. 3) BARNIER PROPERTY ADDITION, BERARD DRIVE 1. No comments. 5) HARBOR VIEW COMMUNITY CARE CENTER, HARBOR VIEW DRIVE 1. The sidewalk along Harbor View Drive must be 5 feet in width and constructed one foot away from the property line. It should also be continuous across the entrance drive. 2. The 6 inch watermain may not be sufficient to produce the required fire flow for the size of structure planned. The pipe size may have to be-8 inch. 3. A storm water detention system'must be included to control the runoff. 1 Harbor Community Care Center Plant List and Budget 93 white Pine 1aa Pin Oak j, Clump Birch >3, Flowering Dogwood yy.y5 Colorado Blue Spruce Lilacs g.3D Dwarf Burning Bush ag.,s6 Spreading Yews .J, Pachysandra Groundcover Sodding & Seeding Landscaping Requirements: South Burlington, VT November 5, 1987 7'-8' tall 2-2 1/2" caliper 6-8' tall 4'-6' tall 4'-5' tall 3'-4' tall 2-2 1/2' tall 18"-24" tall 1 per sq. ft. Building Construction Cost 1.4 million Formula $250,000 x .03 = $ 7,500 $250,000 x .02 = 5,000 $900,000 x .01 = 9,000 $21,500 72 @ $120 8 @ $200 15 @ $100 9 @ $80 4 @ $100 17 @ $30 50 @ $40 130 @ $35 800 plants $ 8,650 1,600 1,500 720 400 510 2,000 4,550 300 $20,230 3,000 $23,230 1S,a4a xa.5=�33,JOj Harbor Community Care Center Plant List and Budget White Pine Pin Oak Clump Birch Flowering Dogwood Colorado Blue Spruce Lilacs Dwarf Burning Bush Spreading Yews Pachysandra Groundcover Sodding & Seeding Landscaping Requirements: South Burlington, VT November 5, 1987 7'-8' tall 72 @ $120 $ 8,650 2-2 1/2" caliper 8 @ $200 1,600 6-8' tall 15 @ $100 1,500 4'-6' tall 9 @ $80 720 4'-5' tall 4 @ $100 400 3'-4' tall 17 @ $30 510 2-2 1/2' tall 50 @ $40 2,000 18"-24" tall 130 @ $35 4,550 1 per sq. ft. 800 plants 300 $20,230 3,000 $23,230 Building Construction Cost 1.4 million Formula $250,000 x .03 = $ 7,500 $250,000 x .02 = 5,000 $900,000 x .01 = 91000 $21,500 Harbor Community Care Center Plant List and Budget White Pine Pin Oak Clump Birch Flowering Dogwood Colorado Blue Spruce Lilacs Dwarf Burning Bush Spreading Yews Pachysandra Groundcover Sodding & Seeding Landscaping Requirements: South Burlington, VT November 5, 1987 7'-8' tall 72 @ $120 $ 8,650 2-2 1/2" caliper 8 @ $200 1,600 6-8' tall 15 @ $100 1,500 4'-6' tall 9 @ $80 720 4'-5' tall 4 @ $100 400 3'-4' tall 17 @ $30 510 2-2 1/2' tall 50 @ $40 2,000 18"-24" tall 130 @ $35 4,550 1 per sq. ft. 800 plants 300 $20,230 3,000 $23,230 Building Construction Cost- 1.4 million Formula $250,000 x .03 = $ 7,500 $250,000 x .02 = 5,000 $900,000 x .01 = 91000 $21,500 i Harbor Community Care Center Plant List and Budget White Pine Pin Oak Clump Birch Flowering Dogwood Colorado Blue Spruce Lilacs Dwarf Burning Bush Spreading Yews Pachysandra Groundcover Sodding & Seeding Landscaping Requirements: South Burlington, VT November 5, 1987 7'-8' tall 72 @ $120 $ 8,650 2-2 1/2" caliper 8 @ $200 1,600 6-8' tall 15 @ $100 1,500 4'-6' tall 9 @ $80 720 4'-5' tall 4 @ $100 400 3'-4' tall 17 @ $30 510 2-2 1/2' tall 50 @ $40 2,000 18"-24" tall 130 @ $35 4,550 1 per sq. ft. 800 plants 300 $20,230 3,000 $23,230 Building Construction Cost 1.4 million Formula $250,000 x .03 = $ 7,500 $250,000 x .02 = 5,000 $900,000 x .01 = 9,000 $21,500 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OCTOBER 19, 1987 The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment held a regular meeting on Monday, October 19, 1987 at 7 PM in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Fred Blais, Chairman, John Dinklage, David Boehm, James Condos, James Thibault, Dan King, Donald Graf Others Present Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator, Sidney Poger, The Other Paper, Lynn & George Gokey, Jr., George Sporzynski, Diane Muhr, Paul Marquis, Susan Dimick, Peter Olesen, Mary Spalding, Bill Spalding, John Larkin, Mr. & Mrs. Irwin Wallman No. 1 Appeal of George Sporzynski & Diane Muhr Appeal of George Sporzynski & Diane Muhr seeking a variance from Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements, request is for permission to construct an addition containing approximately nine hundred (900) square feet to within nine (9) feet of the southerly side yard, at 1408 Spear Street. Mr. Ward said the area is zoned R-1 District. Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements minimum side yard - 25 feet, proposed side yard - 9 feet. Proposed addition - approximately 900 square feet. Lot 144' x 400' - 1.3 acres. Mr. Ward said there was an error in the warned appeal - the addition is on the northerly side yard. The zoning board received a letter from the neighbor on the southerly side who expressed concern about an addition there but when she found out that it was going to be on the northerly side she realized she had made a mistake and had no objection to this. Mr. Sporzynski handed the board members sketches, pictures of his house, and a letter from his neighbors, Doug & Chris Franzoni, in which they support this request for a variance (see letter attached). Mr. Sporzynski said that they wish to add a garage and deck to the northerly side of their house. The reason is to get a better view of the lake and to improve the appearance of the house to conform with the rest of the area. He also showed the board scaled models and explained the location of the deck and garage. He said the distance between my house and the neighbors is 150'- trees will not be affected by the addition. Addressing the 5. criteria, Mr. Sporzynski said his lot is a unique shape - it is not a perfectly square lot. The second floor is above the garage and he is adding a garage to make it a 2 car garage with the deck above the garage. The hardship is that the house was bultt 30 years ago and I bought it last November. My neighbor, Doug Franzoni, is 150 away and he has no objections to this. This is a minimum variance for a single car garage and deck. Mr. Graf asked how far is new garage from the property line and Mr. fiporzynski said between 10` and 15'. Mr. Dinklage asked how old the house was and -2- Mr. Sporzynski said 30 years old. Mr. Ward said Mr. Franzoni's house is less than a year old. The appeal was granted 6 - 1. No. 2 Appeal of George Gokey, Jr. Appeal of George Gokey, Jr. seeking a variance from Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements, request is for permission to construct a 7 x 14 greenhouse to within four (4) feet of the southerly side yard, at Sherry Road. Mr. Ward said the area is R-4 district. Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements. Minimum side yard - 10 feet, proposed side yard - 4 feet (southerly). Proposed 7' x 14' greenhouse. Lot 70' x 120' - dwelling 32' x 42 . Mr. Gokey said both my wife and I have back problems and want to put a spa in and it is not recommended to put it inside the house. A spa and greenhouse will generate heat in the winter but it has to have a southerly exposure. The smallest we can get is 7' x 14'. It will be vented to get rid of the extra moisture. We feel this would increase the value of the property. Mr. Gokey showed the board a sketch and pictures of what it will look like. Mr. Gokey said we have 11' on the south side and Mr. Tardy's residence is located behind my house. We have 31' between my house and his addition - with the greenhouse it will be 24'. His house is further back from mine. Mr. King asked if he would consider going on the back side of the house. Mr. Gokey said we have an in -ground pool in the back and it has no heating value because it's on the east side of the house - it needs to be put on the south side of the house. Mr. Dinklage asked if there was any visual screening between his house and the neighbor's. Mr. Gokey said we have a 10 cedar edge. There was some discussion regarding the neighbor's driveway, back yard, etc. Mr. Gokey addressed the 5. criteria. He said this greenhouse needs to be put on a southerly exposure and this is the only side it can be put in. There was some discussion as to whether it could be put in back of the house. Mr. Dinklage said we would like you to come back with a sketch including the pool to a scale. If we have more facts from you maybe we can come to a solution on this. Mr. Blais said we are trying to be reasonable. Mr. Thibault moved that we table this until the next meeting. This was seconded by Mr. king and all voted aye. The appeal was tabled until the next meeting. No. 3 Appeal of LTH Associates, John Larkin, agent Appeal of LTH Associates, John Larkin, agent, seeking approval from Section 12.00 Conditional uses, sub section 12.211, request is for permission to construct a 19,500 square foot (2 story) structure occupying structure as a 46 unit community care center on a lot containing 2.5 acres, lots 7 & 8 on Harbor View Drive. -3- Mr. Ward said the area is C-2 District. Section 12.20 Conditional uses. Sub section 12.211 nursing & convalescent homes. Proposed 19,500 square foot (foot print) 2 story structure - 46 unit community care center (similar to Pillsbury Manor). Lots 7 & 8 combined contains 2.5 acres. Mr. Olesen said the building is 19,500 square feet similar to Pillsbury Manor. It will have single room and 17 efficiency apartments - this is a Level 3 Residential Care Facility. Mr. King said Level 3 is when the people can care for themselves. Mr. Olesen said yes - some may be in a wheel chair but they need to be able to take care of themselves with little assistance. Mr. Olesen said this facility is fitting with the commercial and residential character which is already there. The character of the area will not be affected. Mr. King asked if a 2 story would affect the view. Mr. Olesen said the view would not be affected. The traffic generated at Pillsbury is very minimal - 3 to 9 cars at any given period of the day. Mr. Blais said there is a mixture going on there now - single family homes, manufacturing in the midst of what appears to be a fairly commercial industrial warehousing park - now appears a community care home. Do you feel that this is going to have a negative affect to the commercial industry. John Larkin said the ravine is a natural buffer - the trees block us from this. Mr. Blais said do you foresee your facility having an affect re noise, traffic, etc. Mr. Larkin said I assume Mr. Irish will develop residential buildings there. Mr. Olesen said as far as parking the requirements are for 1 space for every 4 beds - we have provided more parking - for 47 beds it would be 22 spaces - we have provided 31 spaces here. There was more discussion regarding traffic in that area, sidewalks in front the facility, etc. Mr. Boehm asked about the lot coverage. Mr. Olesen said the parking lot coverage is 14% and the total lot coverage is 32%. Mr. Dinklage said I would like to stipulate that if approved the developer would be required to install a sidewalk that is reviewed by and acceptable to the Planning Commission. This was seconded by Mr. Thibault and all voted aye. Mr. Dinklage said for the record the appealant stated that the development will be built according to the approximate architectural rendering shown on plans dated 9/30/87 by J. Graham Goldsmith Architects. (see attached) John agreed to this. 11q.eA--/'V The appeal was granted unanimously. No. 4 Tabled Appeal of Salamin Handy Tabled appeal of Salamin Handy, Burlington Bagel Bakery, 26 Hinesburg Road, hearing of September 14, 1987. Mr. Ward said this appeal was withdrawn. -4- No. 5 Administrative review of Marauis Bros.. Greeorv•Industrial Park Marquis Bros. Construction received multi -use approval with the stipulation for administrative review. Marquis. Bros. requested admininstrative approval for Norco Auto for strictly warehousing. Mr. Dinklage moved that this request be approved. This was seconded by Mr. Condos and all voted aye. This was approved unanimously. Mr. Dinklage moved that we accept the decision of findings of fact for the minutes of September 28, 1987. This was seconded by Mr. King and all voted aye. There was discussion dmongst the board members and Mr. Ward regarding clarification of Act. 250. The board members asked for a meeting with Regional Planning, Planning Commission and members of Act. 250 to discuss policy and procedures for obtaining permits. Mr. Thibault moved for adjournment. This was seconded by Mr. Dinklage and the meeting adjourned at 8:50 PM. Clerk Co v A« k nj t',40 � t- '. � � Cm. LA c&ccsz���1) �49y� �a o� 12 � rnc�ns P I LANKING^ C0VIISSION JULY 13, 1162 The South Burlington :lannini; Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, July 13, 1982 at 7:30 cm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Jorset St. Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; Peter Jacob, George Mona, James Ewing, Kirk ',woolery Membern Absent Ernest Levesque, Robert valih Others Present David :spitz, Planner; John Larkin, Robert Krebs, Howard Perkett, Stephen Pa4,�,, Doug ':*.zpatrick, Dan O'Brien, 'Russ Launderville, Lowell Krassner, Jodie Peck, Free i'ress; Judy Hurd, The Other Paper Minutes of June 22, 1962 The June 22, 19b2 minutes were approved on a motion by Mr. ..:-.na, a second by Mr. Jacob and a unanimous vote. Continuation of public henring on final plat a�,.lication by L'1H Associates for development of 40 residential acres and 30 commercial acres on property owned t:y .?_rtlett on _helburne itoad. Pro; ect contains 120 units of multi- family housing and 37 individual house lots Mr. :spitz said this was warned incorrectly on June 8 and that it had been properly warned this time, and letters sent to neighbors. Mr. Perkett said he was a neighbor and had not been notified, but he did not know if others had been. Mr. Spitz said more legal information was needed, but that was the city' delay, not the applicant's. ,r. Krebs, representing LTH, said that Bayview would be the name of the main road. He will submit other names to the Planner for approval. Mr. Krebs said the road grade was 30 for 60' coming off route 7. The City Engineer has agreed to that because when the Southern Connector goes in, it will probably impact this access road. Mr. Krebs said he did not want to make a deep cut for this road, so wren the Connector comes in, they will not be out of reach of it. He did not think the State had finalized the design of what the Connector would look like in this area. Mr. Ewing noted that the grade of Shelburne Road might be changed for the Connector. Krebs said that, as far as drainafTe, the main increase would be in the multi -family area, where they would use filters and retention ponds to attenuate the peak flows. 'There will be 4 ponds and Mr. Krebs said they would design them so they did not have berms, but were scooped -out areas. They will be well landscaped, he said. It was suggested that they be designed so they could be mowed. Mr. Krebs said the ponds would insure that water from this development would be released so that it would not increase in speed or volume. Mr. Ewing rioted that each commercial lot would probably have to have its own pond. The erosion problem behind :;hearer Chevrolet was discussed. Mr. Spitz said he could riot justify havint, this developer fix that. He and the City Engineer Manager did not feel thin would worsen the situation, since only part of this drainri�-e will go by that area. Mr. Mona felt the City Engineer should consider that area on the basis -of what should be done, purely from an engineering point 2. of view. Be felt the Commission should wait to hear that information. The other Commission membera fir.';t thr .3hould proceed with the application, a:tncu t;. Mr. Pore: asked for a rrrort from t;,e -'-gineer or, tt,e situation, and Mr. 'acob suggested that member:- take a look at it. Mr. ^'ona wondered about separating the area shown as "neighborrood ,.rk" on the plat from the open space behind clusters 4,5 and 6, but was t;,ld a 30- 40' ravine did that already, and there were also portions of a fence there. Mr. Perkett suggested that there be a stipulation regarding the limitation of 5U units on a single access, and noting that that is not�in addition to whatever is in place already. Ile also requested that the Commission not require a connection to Quail Run, since he felt that would not serve the purpose it was intended to. Mr. Mona noted that if Mr. Larkin wished, he could develop 9 units off the Meadowood at Spear access and 50 off the Shelburne Road access. Mr. 'Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning CommissionapJ)rove the final plat application ty LTI1 Asaaciatps f development cf 40 residential and 30 commercial acres fronting or, :;helburne :toad as depicted on a 23-r-ge plan set entitled "Bartlett Property, Residential, Commercial Lubdivision, LTf Associates," prepared by Krebs and Lansing; Consulting Engineers, with revisionz through July 6, 1982, subj(?et to the following stipulations: 1. All street -mimes :,hrill be approved by t:.e City Planner and shall be indicated on the final__Ll_at. 2. If there is a :iin,;l� Oublic acces<r_fro!u _;h.•lburne Road, the. applicant mrty develop into `50 r� i Ioritial units or 15 co:,r:,e tcixl acres or ;o—e appropri_to combination as deter.mint•d_b the City! PInnner._ If there is a single access at� Meadowood at Lear, the limit is 9 reoidential units. 3. The Pheasant 'Way street connection shall be made before the ''-nail Run connection. 4. The need for sidewalks on the south side of the commercial road shall be reviewed, and required if needed, at the time of application fcr developme-.t yidual lot:. nd 5. The ap;.licant : hall comply with the requirements of Water Superintendent Robert Gardnf,r's letter dated June 4, 1982. 6. Deeds for lots 11 through 19 shall contain wording indicating_ that additional precauti_o_ns_il;rf t�e__needed aat- - tlme o3`—buildin construction to assure h,rol)er :storm drainrite. The wording shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney.. 7. The 10' x 10' trian+,le on all corner lots shall also be indicated on all plan profile sheets. 8. An estimate of total building cost shall be submitted to verify► whether proposed lfrndsci..)ine;_meets the recLuirements_of the ordinance. If any additional land scrip intr is rrquired, a revised plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner. 9. Bondin(*, to c. v(•r the. cost of all required landscaping, streets, sidewalks, utilities xrd other public improvements shall be submitted rior to issuance of a building permit. Bonding shall also include an amount or I- ? on kVA'sr'os PLANNING COMFISSION site rentorntion of all ftre•as disturbed durinconstruction. JUT 13, 1962 10. Reviaed legal document.1, containing required changes from Att: ,rne Richard Spokes' letter dated Jul;, 13, 1982 shall be submitted to and aByroved by the City Attorney prior to recording of the final plat. 11. A revised final plat, containing required changes from stipu-ations 1,_7, and 8 shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to 12. Page 2 of the final plat shall be recorded, at a size and scale that satisfies City and State recording requirements, within 90 days. 13. This approval expires in 4 years. 14. Note #2 on pace 2 of the plan of record shall be removed. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. The motion as origic-,ally male contained a stipulation #8 as follows "Lots 34, 35 and 36 are approved an duplex lots". Mr. Mona said he did not recall any duplex lots, but wa:; told they had been shown from the beginning, lie did not like them, feeling this was not the location for them, and he moved to remove stipulation #8. ":r. Lwink; seconded the motion. Mr. i'rebs said that at sketch plan, they had shown 40 single famil,; lots, and in a discussion with the Recreation Director, who had wanted some park land, they had compromised with more park land and the duplex lots. Yr. Larkin added that these lots had been planned a long time ago and if he had known they would be a problem, he would have changed something else. lJlr. Mona's motion carried with Messrs. Jacob and Woolery voting no. Mr. Mona then moved to add a stipulation to remove note #2 on page 2 of the plan of record. and Mr. Ewing seconded this. It carried with Messrs. Jacob and Woolery voting no. Mr. Mona informed Mr. Larkin that if the courts do not declare the Meadowood at Spear streets to be public, his development could not use them as access from the east. Mr. Spitz said the city did not want to be involved with any private access areas, even if Mr. Larkin could obtain the right to use them. The motion carried with Mr. Mona voting no. He stated that he had wanted information on the erosion situation near Shearer before approving the project. :;ketch plan application by O'i;rien Brothers, Inc. for a 36-unit modular home planned development on iatchen Road west of I-89 Mr. Ewing felt he might have a conflict of interest in this case because of a similar proposal he had in another town, and he wanted to remove himself from the discussion, which he did. Mr. Page, representing the O'Brien brothers, said modular homes were pre -fabricated before they are put on the site. Ifr. Mona asked if these homes could be moved from the site and was told it would take a lot of effort. Mr. Page said the site contained about 31 acres, but it contains irregular and steeply sloping terrain. Tile project will use 8-10 acres for the homes. There is an existing single-family home on the land already, in which are some tenants. The O'Briens will own the land and lease it to the owners of the units. The site will have city water and sewer. The land is zoned R4, so allowed density could be as high as 120 units, but only part of the land is �,. 11011, NORM WUNTRY 15 Morse woe PI,Al�Il\TI1�IG T_, „w„=A-- Essex Jct., Vermont 05452 (802) 878-0305 November 3, 1987 Jane Lafleur, City Planner South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Jane, Enclosed are two copies of my traffic report for the Harbor View Community Care facility. If Craig Leiner is reviewing this information, please forward one copy to him. This report refers to my previous report, dated September 8, 1986, for the office building on lot 9. Please let me know if you do not have that earlier report. Sincerely, David H. Spitz' Enclosure DHS/cc 'PLICATION FOR LAND USE PER T AMENDMENT INSIRjJC'i'IONS: -Use this form for minor Land Use Permit amendments, including permit transfers. Applications for permit transfers are to be completed by the transferree. SECTION 1 - FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No.: Filing Date: Laws Involved: Deemed Completed By: Fee: SECTION II - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT 1. APPLICANT: John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT 05403/864-7444 (Name) (Address) (Phone No.) 2. PROPERTY OWNER: LTH Associates same (Name) (Address) (Phone No.) 3. PERSON TO BE CONTACTED ABOUT THIS APPLICATION (Complete only if different than #1) Deborah Sherman 864-7444 (Name) (Address) (Phone No.) 4. WHAT IS YOUR LEGAL INTEREST IN THIS PROPERTY? 5. IF YOU ARE NOT FILING THIS APPLICATION AS AN INDIVIDUAL, COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Partnership 8/15/79 VT 8/15/79 (Legal Entity) (Date Formed) (State) (Date registered in VT) 6. WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THIS REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE PERMIT: Approval of use for Lots 7 & 8 in the approved Bartlett subdivision. 7. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES IN THE FOLLOWING ITEMS FROM INFORMATION IN THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION a. Acreage in the entire tract of land 70 +- b. Acreage in this project 2.53 C. Date the project will be started Spring 1988 d. Date the project will be completed Fall/winter 1988 e. Funding or bonding of this project f. Municipal services to be used Water/Sewer/Police/Fire g. Estimated construction cost 1,360,000. SECTION III - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED ON PERMIT TRANSFERS 8. TRANSFERREE: I hereby agree to complete this project as set forth in the application, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the Land Use Permit # and as amended above: Q (Transferree) TRANSFERROR: I hereby agree to the transfer of Land Use Permit # set forth above: (Transferror) as SECTION IV - NOTICE TO PARTIES - TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPLICANTS FOR ACT 250 PROJECTS 10. This application must be signed by the applicant and landowner. By -signing this application, the applicant assumes responsibility for the information provided and, when the amendment involves Act 250, confirms that the town selectmen, planning commission, and regional planning commission were given a copy of the application as required. s na u e of applicant) r date ature 6f landowner)ate ( ) SCHEDULE B Act 250 Information Provide all of the information requested below. If a particular item does not apply to your project, indicate that it is not applicable. This information is arranged according to the 10 criteria of 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250). For more information on any of these criteria, refer to the statute or the Act 250 Application Supplement. Criterion 1: Air and Water Pollution Air Pollution 1. Describe the type of heating system proposed: (Include BTUs, if known) : Gas hot water baseboard heat. 2. Describe any process emissions, noxious odors or sources of noise which will result from the project and measures proposed for control: n/a 3. Describe methods that will be used to control dust during and after construction: water and calcium chloride 4. Indicate the number of parking spaces proposed: 26 5. If applicable, has an application been made to the Air Quality Section of the Agency of Environmental Conservation? If so, date of application Water Pollution (A) Headwaters: 1. Does the area qualify as a headwaters area s (efined in the statute? n/a 2. If so, describe how the project will affect ground or surface water quality: 2. (B) Waste Disposal: Provide all of the information requested below, if appropriate. If the project is also subject to review by the Agency of Environmental Conservation under the Environmental Protection Rules, attach all of the appropriate information requested in Schedule C - Sewage Disposal. 1. Describe method of sewage disposal: Municipal 2. Estimate the maximum number of gallons of sewage per day to be generated: 7,235 3. Indicate the type and depth of soils in the sewage disposal area: n/a 4. If a municipal system is to be used, indicate the name of the treatment plant and the uncommitted reserve capacity, if known. 5. Has the connection been approved by the municipality? Ps If yes, attach a copy of the approved letter or documenty 6. If a community disposal system is proposed, how and by whom will it be maintained? n/a 7. Has Certification of Compliance with Division of Protection Regulations been applied for? Yes Status: Being reviewed. 8. Describe the stormwater disposal system: Roof downspouts and overland flows to (2) two 2000 gallon treatment tanks. The tanks discharge to a headwall near Bartlett Brook. 9. will the project involve more than J� acre of paved parking? No 10. Is a Temporary Pollution or Discharge Permit required? Status of application: Yes. Being reviewed. 3. 11. Describe methods of disposal of stumps or other construction debris: Approved dump site. 12. Describe method of storage and disposal of hazardous wastes, if any: n/a (C) Water Conservation: 1. Describe the specific water conserving devices or other practices that will be used: Water conserving fixtures. 2. Do deed restrictions, covenants or leases require the installation, maintenance, and continued use of such devices or practices? n/a (attach a copy if available) (D) Floodways: 1. Indicate high and low elevations of project above mean sea level: High elevation 234' Low elevation 207' 2. Indicate name of any nearby river or stream and the vlp-ation of the 100 year flood: Bartletts Brook n/a 3. Will any portion of the project (including proposed fill or storage areas) be located within the floodw-y or floodway fringe? No 4. If #3 is yes, is it likely that flows will be restricted or diverted? 5. If #4 is yes, provide calculations of increased down --C-.a peak discharge, if any: 6. Describe any storage of floatable materials i, the floodway or floodway fringe. n/a (E) Streams: 1. If project is located near a stream or watercourse, provide name of watercourse and distance from nearest disturbed area: Bartletts Brook; 50 feet to nearest disturbed area except for the discharge point for the storm system. 4. 2. Describe any construction which will disturb the stream in any way: None 3. If stream is disturbed, describe methods that will be employed to maintain the stream in a natural condition: n/a 4. If required, has a stream alteration permit been applied for? n/a Status? (F) Shorelines: 1. Does the project involve the development or subdivision of any shorelines? n/a If yes, describe: 2. If yes, why must shoreline be developed or subdivided? n/a 3. Describe methods used to retain the shoreline in a natural condition: n/a 4. Describe how continued access to water and recreational activities will be maintained; how vegetation will be utilized to screen the development or subdivision from the waters; and how the banks will be stabilized from erosion with vegetation: n/a 5. Criteria 2 & 3: Sufficient Water and Existing Water Supplies 1. Indicate the estimated demand for water in gallons per day: 7235 2. Describe how water will be supplied to the project: From an.;8"•.ductj1P iron water main attached to South Burlingtons municipal system. 3. If a municipal or existing community system is to be used, provide evidence that the reserve capacity exists for this demand and that the connection has been approved: See Letter 4. If an on -site source is proposed, provide evidence of the location and availability of potable water on adjacent property (indicate location on a USGS or similar map): n/a S. If an on -site source has been completed, attach copies of yield tests (except for one lot subdivisions) and copies of chemical and bacteriological examinations: n/a 6. If the project involves a public building or a community water supply which is not a public water supply (less than 10 connections), the information requested in Schedule D must be included wit:- the application. 7. Tf the project is a public building, all of the information in Schedule F. Public Buildings must be included wit', the application. Criterion 4: Soil Erosion and the Ability of the Land to Hold Water 1. Describe terrain (including slopes) in areas where earth work is proposed: The site gently slopes to the west towards Bartletts Brook. It is presently a grassed field. 2. Describe soils (or attach Soil. Conservation Service Soil Survey interpretation Sheet, if availabic.; : See attaced soil survey. 3. Describe nature and extent of earth work proposed: There will be a cut area for the parking on the south side of the entrance and a fill area to cover exposed foundation on the north side of the building. Ur 4. Describe the temporary erosion control measures to be utilized: A snow fence construction barrier will be erected to protect existing woodlands. Hay bale erosion barrier will be used along the 50' conservation district. See attached Erosion Control Notes. 5. Describe the permanent erosion control measures: Seeding and mulching, grass lined swales and stone lined swales. 6. Describe the sequence of the use of erosion control measures during construction if appropriate: See attached Erosion Control Letter 7. Describe any measures or devices that will be used to prevent excessive runoff from the site both during and after construction: See attached Erosion Control Letter. Two 2000 Qallon underground storm tanks will be used. See attached report from Wagner Heindel and Noyes. Criterion 5: Highway Congestion and Safety See North Country Planning 1. Describe the access to the project: Traffic Report 2. Indicate the average daily traffic: existing expected from the project: 3. Indicate the peak hour traffic: existing (if known) expected from the project: 7. 4. Describe the site distances at the intersection of the project access with the town or state highway: S. Indicate the speed limit of the town or state highway: 6. Indicate the number of parking spaces proposed: 7. Provide evidence that the town or state has approved the project access: 8. if construction of a road is proposed, provide a typical cross-section and profile (unless waived by Coordinator): Criterion 6: Educational Services 1. Estimate the number of students resulting from the project: n/a 2. Indicate name and location of primary school(s): 3. Indicate name and location of secondary school(s): 4. Provide evidence that schools named above will be able t(- : c.._,%anodate these additional students: Criterion 7: Municipal Services 1. Check the municipal services that will be utilized: Police x Fire Protection x Solid Waste Disposal ; Water Supply x Sewage Disposal x ; Road Maintenance ; Other 2. Attach letters from representatives of any of the services checked above which indicate that the services are available and will not be unreasonably burdened by the project. (Ensure that the responses from the fire department and ambulance service address the adequacy of emergency vehicle access). 1 M. Criterion 8: Scenic or Natural Beauty, Aesthetics, Historic Sites, Natural Areas or Necessary Wildlife Habitat 1. Describe the site (include terrain and existing vegetation and buildings, if any): Also see grading plan. Gently sloping from center of site t, street and to the brook to the west Building area is rurrent137 open and gra4sy with trees at south and west edges. There is a conservation area either side of brook to west of building. 2. Describe the proposed landscaping (include numbers, species, size of new plantings, and areas of existing vegetation to be retained): See plan. 3. Describe any provisions for maintenance of landscaping and other improvements: By owner/occupant. 4. Describe exterior lighting including fixture type, pole heights and locations: Lighting Systems Inc., Citation series. 8' aluminum pole, square aluminum housing with metal halide lamps. See plan for location. S. Describe all exterior signs (include materials, colors, and type of illumination): One building identification sign near entrance driveway, approx. 3' high x 6' long, wood construction, earth colors to match bldg. and externally lit. 6. Describe building exteriors (include materials and colors): Wood clapboard (4" exposure) and cedar shingle walls with wood trim. Asphalt shingle roof. Colors earth tones with light color --trim, Pny-P rails. 7. Indicate the location and description of any trash or garbage storage areas or receptacles: Trash area is in enclosed near service entry on south side of building. See plan. a R. Describe any known historic sites, natural areas, or necessary wildlife habitat that will be affected by the project: n/a Criterion 9: Conformance with the Capability and Development Plan (A) Impact of Growth: (only complete if instructed to do so by the Coordinator) 1. Does the town have a duly adopted capital improvement program (defined as a plan of capital projects such as physical better- ments or improvements, machinery, or land, including the estimated costs and proposed methods of financing): 2. Estimate the total additional revenues to the town resulting from this project: 3. Estimate the additional costs to the town for the following services: education, highway access and maintenance, sewage disposal, water supply, and police and fire service: (II) & (C) Primary and Secondary Agricultural Soils 1. Describe the type of soils (or attach SCS Soil Survey '.itei,,retation Sheet). See attached soil survey. 2. which of these soils qualify as primary agricultural soils or forest or secondary agricultural soils pursuant to the definitions in Section 6001(8) and (15): none 10. 3. Describe how the potential of these soils for agriculture or forestry will be affected by this project: 4. If the potential of these soils will be significantly reduced by the project, respond on a separate sheet to the appropriate subsections of the subcriteria of 6086(a), 9(B), and 9(C). (D) Earth Resources: 1. Describe any mineral or earth resources on the site with a high potential for extraction: n/a 2. Describe how subsequent extraction or processing of these minerals or earth resources will not be prevented or interfered with: (E) Extraction of Earth Resources: 1. Does the project involve the extraction of any earth resources (including t*--6bil)? u I �'— If yes, describe in detail the site reclamation plan (include alternative use or development of site): (F) Energy Conservation: 1. Describe site related energy conservation considerations including building orientation, protective vegetation, and solar access: Due to the repetitive nature of the housing project thPra ;S ao specific _ south exposure other than 4 sun rooms on hte southeast corner. The main entry is located on the south away from the street and northwest winds. The existing tree line along the south and west will help shade the building. 11. 2. Describe all building related energy conservation measures: R-19 walls R-38 ceiling Double pane windows and steel insulated exterior doors. 3. For large commercial or industrial projects, provide evidence that the structure and mechanical systems conform to ASHRAE 90-80 standards: N/A (G) Private Utility Services: n/a 1. Describe any private utility systems proposed (i.e. water, sewer, stormwater, roads, etc.): 2. Describe type of surety to be provided to protect the municipality in the event that it is required to assume the responsibility for these services or facilities: 3. Include a copy of restrictive covenants to be u'>ee i deeds, or bylaws of any homeowners or condominium as:�ociatior. (H) Costs of Scattered Development: 1. Describe the location of the project in relation to the nearest existing settlement: 12. 2. If the project is not contiguous to an existing settlement, describe how the additional costs of public services or facilities will not outweigh the tax revenue and other public benefits: n/a (J) Public Utility Services: 1. List any necessary supportive governmental or public utility services demanded by the project: Green Mt Power. Vermont a_aQN� ew England TelPphnne 2. Indicate why an excessive or uneconomic demand will not be placed on such facilities or services (usually a letter from the involved service or utility will be sufficient): (K) Development Affecting Public Investments: n/a 1. List any adjacent governmental and public utility facilities, services and lands, including highways, airports, waste disposal facilities, office and maintenance buildings, fire and police stations, universities, schools, hospitals, prisons, jails, electric generation and transmission facilities, oil and gas pipelines, parks, hiking trails, forest and game lands, etc.: 2. Indicate why the project will not adversely affect any such adjacent property: 13. Criterion 10: Conformance with Local or Regional Plan or Capital Program 1. Does the municipality have a duly adopted plan? yes 2. Explain how the project conforms to this plan: Part of previously approved Bartlett subdivision, and Planning and Zoning approvals for use of Lots 7 & 8. 3. Explain how the project conforms to the regional plan: 4. Explain how the project conforms to a duly adopted capital program: List below or on an attached sheet the names and addresses of all adjoining property owners: "Sixteen Ninety Shelburne Rd." 100 Allen Road DBI Industries 58 Allen Rd. Poulin, Geraldine A 16 Harbnr view ud (202 Meadowwood Dr. Box 2266) Signature of Preparer Date N O T I C E COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES A PERMIT pursuant to Title 10 VSA Section 6081 (Act 250) "Commencement of construction" is defined by Act 250 as "the construction of the first improvement on the laird or to any structure or facility located on the land including work preparatory to construction such as clearing, the staking out or use of a right-of-way or in any way incidental to altering the land according to a plan or intention to improve or to divide land by sale, lease or otherwise transfer an interest in the land." (Environmental Board Rule 2 (C)). A violation of any provision of the rules if punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for each day of the violation or imprisonment for not more than two years, or both. (T. 10 VSA, Section 6003). I understand there is to be no site work or construction commenced on this project until a written Land Use Permit is issued. I further understand that verbal indication that a Land Use Permit may be issued does not constitute authorization to commence construction. Applican s ignature -3/7 IZZ Date THIS NOTICE MUST BE EXECUTED AND RETURNED WITH YOUR LAND USE APPLICATION. CC-EB -83 DATE: 3/7/88 In accordance with Title 10 V.S.A., §6086, I certify that I have delivered complete sets of this application and all plans and attachments to the municipality (Selectmen, Aldermen, Trustees), the municipal planning commission, the Regional Planning Commission, and any adjacent municipality and municipal planning commission adjoining this project. FEE: 3400.00 1. LIST OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS AND ADDRESSES: Included LOCATION MAP: Included COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION NOTICE: Included Si ature of Applicant or Messenger Location Map February 5, 1988 HARBOR VIEW COMMUNITY CARE CENTER Erosion Control and Construction Sequence 1. The purposes of erosion control shall be discussed with and approved by the engineer and the City of So. Burlington prior to any clearing, grubbing, stripping or construction of any kind. 2. All erosion control shall be placed as shown on the drawings or as ordered by the engineer. The contractor shall maintain the erosion control measures until the engineer is satisfied that permanent ground cover is established and that further measures are not required. 3. There will be a hay bale erosion barrier along the easterly limits of the conservation limit and a snow fence construction barrier along the wooded south side of the project. These erosion control measures shall be installed prior to any clearing, grubbing, stripping or construction of any kind. Hay bales will not be earth trenched, and silt fence trenching will be done by hand work, not by machine. 4. At this point the shrubs and trees within the construction limits will be cleared. All shrubs and trees cleared shall be removed from the site. S. The site can then be cleared and grubbed. All roots and deleterious materials shall be removed from the site. 6. After rough grading, the storm system will be constructed. The storm system consists of a catch basin draining to two settling tanks, then discharging to a concrete headwall. 7. All excess material and topsoil shall be stockpiled along with the material excavated from the adjacent Harbor Inn project on Lots #10 & 11. This stockpile shall be surrounded by a hay bale erosion control_ dam and shall be seeded and mulchedtominimize erosion potential. 8. The foundation can be constructed next. Any water collected in the foundation trenches will be pumped into the sediment tanks. 9. During construction the settling tanks shall be inspected weekly and cleaned if necessary. After all construction has been completed the tank should be inspected and cleaned once a year. 10. As disturbed areas are graded and topsoiled, they will be seeded and mulched immediately to reduce the erosion potential of the soil. 11. Any drainage swales with a slope greater than 5% shall use a stone lining for stabilization. See engineer for detail. 12. An engineer shall conduct erosion control inspections weekly and after any rainfall of greater than 1 inch. The reports will outline construction progress and controls in place, note any new or proposed controls and changes to the erosion control plan, note any problems, outline measures taken to repair erosion damage, and note measures taken to restrict encroachment beyond the above -defined physical limits to the on -site activity. Inspections shall continue until the site is fully stabilized. 13. When erosion control measures are deemed no longer necessary, all materials detained, including silts and construction runoff debris, shall be collected and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the engineer and the City of South Burlington. EROSION EVALUATION ON PROBLEM SITES All areas on a construction site that do not meet the criteria set forth in the beginning of this chapter are considered problem areas. Evaluate the erosion potential of these areas using the following procedure. This -evalua- tion should help determine the degree, of the problem and the measures best suited for general application (see Chapter 5). It should also reveal those particular fac- tors that make the area susceptible to severe -erosion. Measure these four physical factors to evaluate the soil erosion and sedimentation potential of the problem areas: 1. Extent of disturbed soils 2. Steepest average slope of the disturbed area 3. Time period of soil disturbance 4. Distance downslope to critical natural or man- made features A step-by-step method is given in the following pages for determining these four factors. Convert all measured quantities to whole numbers (called Rating Numbers), by using the conversion tables for each factor included in the worksheets. The formula* for est_iniating the erosion potential of a construction area is: TRN - A s (3 + T) i P where TRN = 'rotnl Rating Number A - Area Rating Number S - Slopn Rnting Number T - Time Rating Number P = Vrozlmlty Rating Number To eatlmato thn oronlmi potonLlnl or your oonotruotlon eIto , onlculnte Its Totnl 11nting Numbed If TI1N In lnan thnn 100t low nroslon potential it T11N in 100 to 400i mndlum oronlon potential 1r '171N in grootnr them 400i high nronlon potential If an area has low erosion potential, the measures in Chapter 4 should be sufficient for erosion control. If it is rated moderate or high, use Chapter 5 to determine minimal erosion and sediment control measures. The indi- vidual Rating Numbers (A, S, T, or P) are also useful to identify the particular: sit(; characteristics that require special attention. *This formula was developed out: of a procedure first sug- gested by an ad hoc committee of the Agency of Environ- mental Conservation in 19v9. It was modified for this handbook. �� I. AREA Workshoot 1. Roads a. Total disturbed length of disturbed rights-of-wnyr ft b. Total disturbed width of disturbed rights-of-wayt ft o. Multiply length by wldtht sq. ft. of roads 2. Duilalinas a. Total length of disturbed area around proposed buildinget 370 ft b. Total width of disturbed area around 100 proposed buildingsi ft o. Multiply length by w W t.lt t 37,000 n,l, 'rt. of buildings Or use planimeter for i rro,pilar.ly vhapvd areas. 3. Other disturbed areas (parking lots, ski trails, sewage disposal areas, quarry sitnn, rosorvolr sites) n. Total length of disturbod soilt ft b. Total width of disturbed solli ft o. Multiply length by width, 45356.8 sq. ft. of (irregular shape) Or use planimeter. disturbed soil 4. Total the square feet of disturbed soil, convert to acres by dividing by 43,560t Total square feett 82356.8 _ 43,560 . 1.89 acres 5. Determine the Area Rating Number (A) from the conversion chart below, enter It In the lower right corner of the page, and in the Classlficntion Formula on pace 22. Acres A 0 - 0.25 1 0.26 - 3.00 Cj:::) 3.10 - 6:00 3 6.10 - lo.0o 4 10.10 - 15.00 5 15.10 - 20.00 6 20.10 - 30.00 7 30.10 - 40.00 0 It0.10 - 50.00 9 50.00 t 10 2 (A) II. SLOPE Worksheet. I. ueing n ouutour tnnp or thr, n„ur.l.rnnl.inn nite,' loostn tho contour llnn of hlghor,t nlevnt.ion of disturbed sollot olovntiont 232 ft Prom the nomn mat,, tunnt.n Ili.. nun Lnur ]inn of lowest elevation of disturbed soil on the sllu•t olovntiont 212 ft 3. Subtract the lowest elevation from the highest*i difference: 20 ft 4. Using the map scale, dntermirtn the horizontal distance* bntwoon the two closest points of hlghnst and lowest elevation (see example on the following page)i distance t 305 ft 5. Calculate the steepest average slope of disturbed soils, Divide the difference in elevation (13) by the horizontal distance (p4)t Difference. t 20 - Dls tnncn t 305 z 100 - 6 _ ss percent elope 20 6. Determine the Slope Rating Dumber (S) from the conversion chart below, enter it in the lower right corner of this page, and in the Clssslflcation Formula on page 22. 1'ercant Slope S 0 - 1.0 1 1.1 - 2.0 2.1 - 4.o 4.1 - 6.o f` 6.1 - 8.o r✓/ 0.1 - 10.0 G 10.1 - 12.0 7 12.1 - 14.0 `1 14.1 - 16.o 9 16 + 10 "Accurately surveyed elevations and distances, or Informntion from the site topogrnpilic map, 5 nre neoeptnble. __ (S) SLOPE EXAMPLE l30� /ZS �pnfA4/ O! ^f f0 REGT EirtJar.e., DE R AIA770111 �� ' GOA•-OVR /NJ ER✓A4 SrRJ4h1 S lrcr S,re Pr t Correct Slope Determination ,nin ❑Lmnpent nvnt'n,v, 1n mnnrnrt'm1 LrnLwnnn thn platted polnto of the hlghent: and lownaL nlnvnl;lnns: high elevntlonr 1,)5 ft low nlevntlont l:O ft. itImLnnont hUu fI Slope A .Ll_]5120? 1'trcenL' Slott^ 400 Therefor- the Slop(, r'.nt;tnq ;lui,':r•r (S) _ ). !I!. Tl',, Workshect To establish the Time Rntlnc Number (T), determine the length of timo the dlsturbod loll will remain oven and unstabllized In wneks or months. If the project Is to be phased over a period of months or yenrs, ovnlunte each construction phase seonratoly. .there Inddequate Information Ir. available to evaluate the time factor, estimate the lona•nst reasonable time for the proposed project, ua1ng Six tr.onths for smaller projects, and the construction drrndllne dates In the State Land Use Permit for lnrgor projncts. r May Sept./Oct. Starting datet Finishing date: Length of time of soil disturbanent wks. or months 'leek's Months �- 1 0. 1.1 - 4 o.26 - 1 1 5 - 8 1.25 - 22j 22j 5-4 13-16 �.217 4 24 21 - 5.25 - 6 25 - 28 6.25 - 7 7 29 - 32 7.25 - 8 3 33 - 36 8.25 - 9 9 36 + 9 + 10 6 (T) IV. pROXINITY' Worksheet To determine the Proximity Rnting Number (P), measure the distance from the closest oolnt of disturbed soil on the construction site to the nearest critical natural or man-made feature in the downslope direction. Such features Include streams, ponds, roads. bulldings,' parking lots, utilities, and wetlands. Distance to nearest critical feature., 50 ft Determine the Proximity Rating Number (P) from the conversion chart below, enter it in the lower right corner of this page, and In the Classification Formula on page 22. Distance Downslope feet P 0 - 30 10 61 - loo 101 - 200 7 201 - 300 6 301 - 500 501 . - 1000 1001 - 2000 3 2001 - 3000 2 3001 + 1 9 V• CLASSIFICATION FORMULA Worksheof 1'ne Classification Formula is: TRN - A x (S + T) x P Enter the calculnted vnlues for ranch 1lntlng Number In the blanks below, and cnlculnte t'ho Total Rnting Number. TERN 2 x( 5 + 6 ) z 9 TRN 198 The calculated erosion nntantinl for .. construction project Is determined as below: TRN I:roslon Potential less than 100 low 100 to 40o medium greater than 400 high The erosion potential for 198 medium p your cmtstruc2;lnn Mrro�eot 1!! ,_. 22 Peak Qest = 25 cfs Estimated Capacity 45 cfs NEW 24"11CP CULVERT Peak Qest = 25 cfs Estimated Capacity 45 cfs W 18" RCP CULVERT Green MoLnton Dr Peak Qest = 5 cfs Estimated Capacity 10 cfs NEW 24" RCP CULVERT Peak Qest = 26 cfs ,-__� �•. Estimated Capacity 26 cfs E \\ SIN Off ve E \ — `�... � � �....� _ Ads \ BIB elB BIA BIIA Droiro9e p X IGgC Hn HnA AdA _ BI ._ _. 1 _ - Dmin( \ _... _ . 006 Dral Area L� VII 1 Ve B Gga as �' \ � IDrafna9e Hn B Hn A' . Ar we �® _ � _ _ m Vi c pdg GeB I WA al I Ad A A r ..\ � ,N. � BI �/ DQrea V A� — Hn A d g rai BIB < BIB I - 1 �� _ �\ DwIi -Allen d. II Gr B Hn EwA \ Fin - GrB I . a X Ge B � Ad B Hn A , ' Droi Oge Area BIB / Ve C \ I EwA \� /Hn C e GeC +B Sfito�b�f1�, St A Ve B / NEW PLATE H Ve B \ \ 44" x 72" Plate Arch \ \v\ Peak Qest = 202 cfs Estimated Capacity 280 cfs EXIST NQ 48 RCP CULVERT - Peak Qest = 150 cfs \ \ Hn C Estimated Capacity cfs \ btc Ve B + 1 Ve H Soil ---_Legend .--SyragL Name Orade Hydraulic Group Ad A Adams and Windsor loamy sands 0 to 5 percent slopes A M B " 5 to 12 percent slopes A Ad E " " " " " 30 to 60 percent slopes A BI A Belgrade and Eldridge soils 0 to 3 percent slopes C Bl B It" 3 to 8 percent slopes C Bo Down -out land Ew A Enosburg and Whately soils 0 to 3 percent slopes D Ge B Georgia stony loam 3 to 8 percent slopes B Ge C It" " 8 to 15 percent slopes B Gg C Gecxgio extremely stony loam 0 to 15 percent slopes B Gr'B Groton gravelly fine sandy loam 5 to 12 percent slopes A Hn A Hinesburg fine sandy loam 0 to 3 percent slopes C Hn B it " �� 3 to 8 percent slopes C Hn C It " " " 8 to 15 percent slopes c Hn D " " 15 to 25 percent slopes C Hn E " " 25 to 60 percent slopes C St A Stetson gravelly fine sandy loam 0 to 5 percent slopes B Ve B Vergennes clay 2 to 6 percent slopes D Ve C '" 6 to 12 percent slopes D Ve D 12 to 25 percent slopes D H VNWagner, Heindel, and Noyes, InC. consulting geologists P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820 BARTLETT BROOK/HARBOR VIEW COMMUNITY CARE CENTER ANALYSIS OF HYDROLOGIC IMPACT SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Prepared By: Jeffrey A. Nelson January 19, 1988 1. The proposed site plan for the Harbor View Community Care Center (lots 7 and 8 Harbor View Road), prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers Inc., and dated November 1987 has been reviewed. 2. Several options have been examined to minimize the increase in peak discharge in Bartlett Brook resulting from this building. Additionally, the issue of stormwater quality has been reviewed. 3. The option which results in the lead imnact on peak flo•:.7 rates in Bartlett Brook relies upon the following drainage control. 2 a) All roof drainage collected and piped directly to storm drain system on Harbor View Road. b) Drainage from easterly portion of parking area and entryway be directed to grass areas along northern edge of lot. This overland flow of stormwater over grassy terrain will maximize removal of particulate material as well as oils and greases. c) Drainage from the remainder of paved areas is to be directed to a 4,000 gallon tank to be located beneath the island in the parking lot. The purpose of this structure is primarily for stormwater treatment, as it is too small to provide significant reduction in peak discharge. Outflow from this structure is to be directed to the south and discharged at Bartlett Brook just south of the property. 4) With this drainage plan in place, the following peak flows are projected. Peak Discharge From Site Peak Discharge In Barlett Brook PRE -DEVELOPMENT 5.69 cfs 162.80 POST -DEVELOPMENT 9.41 cfs 163.21 3 5) Numerous retention options were investigated, but given the timing of peak discharge from the site (around 11.97 hours), which is much earlier than the peak of the overall watershed at this location (12.44 hours), it would be necessary to store a prohibitively large volume of water in order to delay the peak from the site until after the peak from the watershed passed. Therefore, the approach which has been utilized has been to allow the peak discharge from the site to occur as early as possible within the design storm event, in order that it still occurs well before the peak from the remainder of the watershed. In this way, there is little or no increase to peak discharge in the stream itself, even though there is an increase in the rate of peak discharge from the site. 6) Given the proximity of the site to the stream, strict erosion control measures should be implemented during the construction of the building. tl,.�PhtE�1T- JiI�M P`r' THrL+ 1 - SELECTED ?ES:�L�L"= _+F =,TNPiD:iRD "ND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS iN THE OP.DEP PERFOPMEO (� - TAR+. * + AFTc^' THP PFHk D ( CHAR , = T I VIE AND RATE ( CFS i UALUES I Nn I GATES A FLAT TOR HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION PARK , ? '+ INDICATES ri HYDROGPAPH 1.11 TH PEHK AS LAST PO I rl i SECTION/ STANDARD PrIiN ArITEC MAIrl PP.ECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STPI_!r_TURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERA TIOr: AREA :t COND 1NCRE:M BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE PATE 1.30 MI) (HP) (HP) +IN) (HP.) (IN) (FT) (HP) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STnP.M 1 STRUCTURE 1 RUrr.]FF 25? 2 2 .10 0 4.JO 24. 00 1.31 08- 12.24 223.97 37 1 .5 STRUCTURE 1 RE'=.!OR 257 2 2 .10 0 4.00 24.00 1.81 229.34 13.52 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 1 PErCH .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 210.98 13.60 F 31.47 122.4 XSECTION ^_ rRUri!]FF 033 2 V, 4.0cl 24.00 -8 .88- 12.2'4 36.52 44:3.0 XSECTION 3 AC+HYD .340 ^- 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.01 20c.26 12.25 67.39 198.2 XSECTION REACH .340 2 2 .10 .0 a.00 24.00 1.61 196.74 12.37 6'•.48 192. STRUCTURE 2 P.UN+2FF 175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 88- 12.32 53.11 303.5 STRUCTURE 2 RE'=t)OP. .175 2 2 10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 925.84 12.322 56.20 321.1 XSECTION 4 REACH .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .80 191.83 12.42 56.10 320.6 STRUCTURE _ ADC-iYD 515 2 " 10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 .98- 12.41 120.93 234.8 STRUCTURE 3 PESVOP 515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 .88- 12.41 120.93 2--34.8 XSECTION 6 REACH 515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 192.24 12.51 120.93 234.3 XSECTION 7 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 147.96 12.61 120.04 233.1 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF .110 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.40 .88- 12.15 88.95 808.6 XSECTIOH 7 ADDHYD .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 148.12 12.59 147.19 235.5 STRUCTURE 4 RES'!OR 625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 150.38 12.67 139.19 222.7 XSECTION a REACH .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 133.22 12.77 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 RUNCFF .006 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.86 .88- 11.96 11.49 1915.5 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD 631 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 133.22 12.77 140.11 222.1 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .259 2 2 ..0 .0 4.00 24.00 1.74 .aa- 12.44 162.24 626.4 XSECTION 20 RUNOFF 004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.31 .89- 11.97 5.69 S%Tq 1323.6 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD 263 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.73 214.23 12.44 162.89 etco%y,613.7 XSECTION 10 RUNCFF 050 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.27 .88- 12.25 29.72 594.4•--,� XSECTION 11 ADDHYD .313 2 - .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.66 202.72 12.41 186.37 594.`. XSECTION 12 REACH .313 2 2 .10 .0 •+.00 24.00 1.66 146.88 12.51 186.37 594.9 STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .009 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.98 .8A- 11.97 16.88 1917.9 STRUCTURE 13 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.30 .89- 11.96 7.21 2327.4 STRUCTURE 13 P.ESk.'OR .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.38 199.43 12.00 5.49 1772.2 XSECTION 18 ADDHYD .012 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.08 207.61 11.97 22.31 1875.0 XSECTION 18 REACH .012 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.11 207.61 12.07 22.31 1874.9 STRUCTURE 3 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.53 .00- 11.96 6.46 2514.8 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .014 2 2 .11) .0 4.00 24.00 2.18 145.94 12.03 25.21 1742.3 X1 LAJT =t t"f' -r.'• �r C:_ c_ _ _: _c - - F T = -c r . T ,z: D _rli, E,-,JT t- ,-GHT?OL i NSTPUCT [ OrdS i N 'HE ORDER PEPFi •RMEC t - AFTEP i "E_ PP-Av. G I SCHHPG T i r AND `-ATE (:CFS I VALUES I NI I [CATES A FLAT TOP H r DRt=GPARH A 01 = =,?ION r'i�'Rv t ' i I tdD ; Cr+TES rl HYf_.R06R'iPH IJ I TH PEI h i S LAST POINT. j 9D-T I Ord. Gq I t1 AHT=C r IA I ^I PREC I P i TAT I ON PEAb:: D I SCHAPGE STRIICTI_IPE i=•iNT00L "'Rr;fNWGE TABI_- I•'OI`�T TIIIE ------------------------- RUNOFF ---------------------------------- I D 13PERAT I Ott AREA CONCI i NCREM BEGIN r-MOUNT DURAT ION AMOUNT ELEQAT I ON T I ME Fr IT= PATE =t7 i1I i I.HR) I.HR1 ( IN) .HRl (IN) (FT) iHRI iCFSi I.CSM: AL T ERNrJE STOPr' _ STRUCTURE _ Fl;NOFF .257 2 2 10 0 i.01] 24.00 1.31 .9A- 12.24 223.9? 371.5 STRICTURE 1 RES•IIOP .257 2 = .10 ] 4.00 24.00 1.81 22_9.3-i 13.52 31.47 122.4 XSECTION _ R=,[H 257 .10 .0 ..00 24.00 1.81 210.98 17.60 - 31.4 1^_2.4 XSECTION _' Rt_:u_FF 933 ? 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.1J0 .'3 AA- 12.24 36.52 440.0 XSECTION ADD-ifD 34iI _ = 10 .0 4.00 ^_4.1)0 1.ci1 206.2o 12.25 67.39 198.'2,.� XSECTION 5 REACH .340 2 2 .19 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 196.74 192.37 65.48 192).c STRUCTURE 2 RUr+OFF .175 2 ^_ .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 A9- 12.32 53.11 303.5 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOP .175 ' ' 10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 925.84 12.32 56.20 321.1 XSECTION 4 REACH .175 2 _' .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .80 191.83 12.42 56.10 320.6 _.TP.UCTLIRE 3 AGUHYD 515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 AA- 12.41 120.93 234.8 STRUCTURE 3 P.ESVOF .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 AA- 12.41 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 6 REACH 515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 192.24 12.51 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 7 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 147.96 12.61 120.04 233.1 XSECTION RUNOFF 110 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 9-4.00 1.40 AA- 12.15 88.95 809.6 XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 143.12 12.59 147.19 235.5 3 STRUCTURE a P.ESI'OR .625 ^. 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 150.38 12.67 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 REACH .-i25 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 133.22 12.77 139.1? 2212.7 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF 006 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.86 .AA- 11.96 11.49 1915.5 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .631 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 133.22 12.77 140.11 222.1 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .259 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.74 .AA- 12.44 162.24 626.4 STRUCTURE 15 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.56 .99- 11.96 2.76 A 2511.2 STRUCTURE 15 RESVOR .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.30 24.00 2.61 223.13 11.98 2.59T--, 2358.4� XSECTION 20 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.15 AA- 11.98 2.76 s 1973.5 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD 003 _ 2 .10 .0 1.00 24.00' 2.36 211.40 11.98 5.36 2142.8 XSECTION 20 RUNOFF .000 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.89 A9- 12.00 .69 c, 1$71.9 XSECTION 20 AGDHYD .00: _ 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.30 211.46 11.97 6.09 2123.0 XSECTION 20 RUNOFF .001 _ 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.-16 .AA- 12.00 1.04 0 1489..7 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .0104 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.13 211.54 11.97 2015.0 XSECTION 20 RUNOFF 001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.76 .49- 11.95 2:25 =s 3126.2 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD 004 2 2 .10 .13 4.00 24.00 2.41 211.72 11.97 41s.r--:,w194.6 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD 263 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.75 214.23 1?_44 163.21 dz w �19.9 XSECTION In RUNOFF .050 2 2 .10 .0 i.00 24.00 1.2;' AA- 12.25 20.72 594.4 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL (802) 6S8-7953 February 18, 1988 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER WILLIAM 1. SZYMANSKI District Environmental Offices District #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Attn: Ernie Christianson Re: Community Care Home Harbor View Road -Bartletts Bay South Burlington, Vermont Dear Ernie: The above referenced project will be served by the municipal sewer system. The estimated flow of 7,235 gallons per day will be treated at the Bartletts Bay sewage treatment plant. There is sufficient reserve capacity at this plant to accept this volume. Very truly yogrs, William J:: 5zyfnanski City Manager WJS/b CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT 403 QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT05401 Deborah Sherman Project Coordinator Larkin Realty 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT. 05403 February 11, 1988 Re: Act 250 Review - Harbor View Community Care Center South Burlington, Vermont Dear Ms. Sherman, In response to your request for information regarding Champlain Water District capability to supply water to the referenced proposed project we submit the following: 1. Water is supplied to the referenced area via a 1611 transmission main. 2. Adequate storage is located and maintained north of of the Spear St./Allen Rd. intersention by a 500,000 gallon storage tank. 3. Your estimated demand of 7,050 gallons per day for this proposed development could be furnished by the Champlain Water District without restricting or encumbering its present users on the CWD supply system. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT James W. Fay Operations Supervisor cc: E. Blake P. Jacob W. Szymanski S. Messina t Vermont Gas P.O. Box 467, Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-863-4511 February 10, 1988 Deborah Sherman Larking Realty 1185 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Harbor View Community Care Center Harbor View Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Deborah: With regard to the proposed Harbor View Community Care Center, please be advised that a natural gas pipeline is located on Harbor View Road adjacent to your property, and is available for your energy requirements. Vermont Gas understands the proposed facility is 39,000 square feet building located on lots 7 and 8, and can serve these additional loads without affecting our present firm customers. The gas service to the building must be annotated on the site plans presented for the Act 250 permit application. If we can be of further assistance, please call. MJP/ps Sincerely, Michael J. Poirier Manayet - CuituueLcial Sales Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. 5uutl Nurltngtun Fire Depanment 575 Uurnet ftrret lt�uutb Nurlingtnn, Pennant 1154I11 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 February S, 1988 Harbor View Community Care Center Mr. John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Larkin, The fire department reviewed a set of plans on the Harbor View Community Care Center you want to build on Habor View Drive in South Burlington. At this time I do not see a problem for our department in given proper emergency protection if needed. I would like to thank you for your cooperation in trying to make South Burlington a safe community to live and work in. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Sincerely G� �iisorXi�G-(/lam ames W. Goddette Sr Chief SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 John M. Race, Chief Telephone (802) 658-1050 February 10, 1988 Deborah Sherman Larkin Realty 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ms. Sherman, I have reviewed the site plan for the proposed building in South Burlington and find no objection to the project at this time. The project will not create an undue burden of the City services rendered by this department. 0cer of John Race th Burlington Police Department JMR/kj tPLANNING John Larkin LTH Associates, Inc. 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear John, 15 Morse Drive Essex Jct., Vermont 05452 (802) 878-0305 October 29, 1987 Enclosed is a report on traffic impacts from your proposed retirement facility on Harbor View Road. The report estimates peak hour and average weekday volumes for the facility. It also evaluates impacts at the Route 7/Harbor View intersection. As required by Act 250, cumulative development traffic volumes are as follows: TRIP GENERATIONS TOTALS - "BARTLETT PROPERTY" A.M. Peak Hour Enter Exit Total P.M. Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Average Weekday Previously Approved* Retirement Development Facility 212 2 138 7 350 9 169 10 198 12 367 22 3730 161 *Includes 53 single-family and duplex units, 89 multi -family units, 3 mixed commercial buildings, a 200 room hotel and restaurant, and 1 office building (approved by South Burlington but not by DEC #4). The portion of the above traffic that will pass through the Route 7/ Harbor View Road intersection is given on page A-2. The updated analysis of the intersection produces identical conclusions to the previous report by North Country Planning, dated September 8, 1986. * Signalization of the intersection is not warranted. * Left -turning vehicles from Harbor View Road will experience very long delays during peak periods. ( Page 2 * The "throat" of the Harbor View approach to the intersection should be widened to facilitate exiting right turns. I will be happy to provide any additional information that may be needed. Si cerely, David H. Spitz cc: Peter Olesen Enclosure DHS/cc North Country Planning 9 15 Morse Ilrive 9 F„ssct Jct., N T. Page A-1 October 29, 1987 I. Development Traffic Larkin Realty has indicated that the proposed development will consist of 17 units with living, dining, bedroom, kitchen and bath and 30 units with bedroom and bath. The smaller units are very similar to existing units at Pillsbury Manor. Traffic estimates are derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and from on -site counts at Pillsbury Manor. Peak hour trips are based on the number of beds (residents) in the facility. Pillsbury Manor currently has 28 residents in 24 units, an occupancy rate of just under 1.2 beds per unit. The smaller units in the Harbor View facility should have a similar occupancy rate, and the larger units should have slightly higher rate. Occupancy Total Type of Unit Number Rate Beds Bedroom, bath only 30 1.2 36 Bedroom, bath and other 17 1.5 26 62 IT trip rates for "nursing homes" produce the following traffic estimates. ITE Trip Rate Harbor View Traffic Time Period per bed 62 beds A.11. Peak Hour Enter .03 2 Exit .11 7 Total .14 9 P.M. Peak Hour Enter .16 10 Exit .20 12 Total .36 22 Average Weekday 2.60 161 II. Area Traffic Previous development approvals have stipulated that traffic conditions at the Route 7/Harbor View Road intersection be monitored as the LTH development progresses. The most recent evaluation was provided in a report by North Country Planning dated September 8, 1986 for a proposed 20,000 square foot office building lot 9. This report uses the data North Country Pla.nnmi g • 15 Morse Drive • Essex Jet., Y r. Page A-2 October 29, 1987 from the previous analysis with the following adjustments: * 1986 and 1991 Route 7 through volumes are increased at an annual rate of 1.023 percent to produce 1987 and 1992 design hour volumes. * Intersection p.m. turning movements are derived from an on - site count taken on October 21, 1987. * 80% of development is estimated to pass through the intersection with 75% traveling to/from the north and 25% to/from the south. 1987 and 1992 p.m. design hour volumes are given below with new development traffic underlined. 1987 P.M. DHV TURNING MOVEMENTS ROUTE 7/HARBOR VIEW ROAD Route 7 New Development Traffic is underlined 44 1289 6 60 + 7 �— 21 + 3 941 12 (— 2 1992 P.M. DHV TURNING MOVEMENTS ROUTE 7/HARBOR VIEW ROAD Route 7 New Development Traffic is iinriarl . nPH 44 1444 6 60 + 7 �-21+3 T 1054 12 2 Harbor View Road Harbor View Road North Country Plannftig 9 15 Morse Drixv • Essex, Jct., W. Page A-3 October 29, 1987 Capacity analyses are attached and summarized below. Results are unchanged from the previous report. With two lanes on Route 7 in 1987 and four lanes in 1992, all Route 7 through movements and turns into Harbor View Road will operate at level of service C or better. Until Route 7'is widened, right turns from Harbor View Road can operate at level of service C only if two existing lanes are provided. Under all conditions, left turn exits from Harbor View Road will operate at level of service E. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ROUTE 7/HARBOR VIEW ROAD Approach Turning Movement Time Period Level of Service Rt. 7, North Left 1987 P.M. B Harbor View Left ItE Harbor View Right ItC Rt. 7, North Left 1992 P.M. A Harbor View Left itE Harbor View Right ItA North Country Planning 9 15 Morse Drive 0 Essex Jct., VT. Page A-4 October 29, 1987 APPENDICES * Pillsbury Manor traffic count, October, 1987 * Route 7/Harbor View Road traffic count, October 21, 1987 * Unsignalized intersection analysis, 1987 Pf1 DHV * Unsignalized intersection analysis, 1992 PM DHV North Country Planning • 15 Nlorsc Drivc • Essct Jct., vr. 1530 Williston Rd. So. Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 863-2386 This traffic iC pattern is recorded from October 12 to October 16, 1987. The following information is the high and low range fot- each time period during the week.. i a. tit. to 10a. m. 10a. m. to. 3p. m. $p. m. to Cp. tit. ------------------------------------------------------------- CAR Its — ~' - CARS OUT - D4��(--j , yle(A) AwAr vdl--6 Time: 4:05-5:05 p.m., Wednesday, October 21, 1987 Location: Harbor View Road at Shelburne Road, South Burlington Conditions: Chilly, Partly Cloudy From Shelburne Road From Harbor View Road Right Left Left Right Enter Enter Exit Exit 4:05 4 5 2 4: 10 1 4 4:15 1 3 1 4:20 1 4 2 4:25 4 1 4: 30 2 2 2 4: 35 1 4 4 4:40 1 2 1 7 4: 45 2 4 1 1 4: 50 1 5 3 2 4:55 4 2 3 5:00 4 1 6 10 40 13 35 Totals: Enter 50 To/From North 75 Exit 48 To/From South 23 98 98 North Cotmtry Plannhi * 9 15 Morse Drive • E,-,sex Jct., AT. 1985 HC M : UNS I GNAL I ! ED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150i �00 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... Harbor View Road NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... Route 7 NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. D. Spit: DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 10/26/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. 1987 P.M. DHV INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTERSEC T I ON TYPE: T- I NTEI SECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WL-s NB SB LEFT -- 24 0 50 THRU - - i i J41 128' R I G[AT -- 67 14 c i NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------------------------------------ E B WB NI:i SB LANES -- 1 1 i ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Pape-2 PERCENT RIGHT GHT TURN CURB RADIUS C f t ) ACCELERATION LANE: GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------------------ EASTBOUND ___..__._ _____. .____- _ WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 0 9() 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VE:HICLE:S % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUNll -- ---- -.._._ WESTBOUND 0 U G NORTHBOUND C) c) ) SOUTHBOUND i) U o CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.20 5.20 0. 00 5. 20 MINOR LEFTS WB 7. 10 7.10 0.00 7. 10 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTI_ W ACTUAL FLOW T I AL MOVEMENT SHAPED RESERVE FATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT vCE_„=ph i c (p ph) c (pcph) c (pcph ) c = c v LOS p M Sid R SH --- MINOR STREET W& LEFT 26 75 69 E'D 42 RIGHT 74 295 295 295 221 MAJOR STREET E i_ SE{ LEFT 55 419 419 419 364 B 1985 HCM: UNSI8NALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR'.'.......'..............'.....'. 1 AREA POPULATION....................~..'.......... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..................... Harbor View Road NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET..................' Route 7 NAME OF THE ANALYST.......''.''...''........'.... D. Spitz DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)''................ 10/26/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED...'.'......'......''........ 1992 P.M. DHV INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB ____ ____ SB ---- ____ LEFT -- 24 0 50 THRU -- 0 527 722 RIGHT -- 67 14 0 NUMBER OF LANES ____________________ EB LANES -- ______________________________________________ WB NB SB ______ _______ ------- 2 2 2 ADJUSTMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE--' ANGLE ---------- FOR RIGHT TURNS ---------------- FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- ; ----- ' --- --- - WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND --- --- --- WESTBOUND O 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 O 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 O 0 CRITICAL GAPS ------------- MINOR RIGHTS WB MAJOR LEFTS SB MINOR LEFTS WB ------------------------------------------------------ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE -------- ADJUSTMENT ----------- CRITICAL GAP ------------ 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 7.60 7.60 0.00 7.60 CAPACITY AND LEVEL —OF —SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN— ACTUAL FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ___ MINOR STREET WB LEFT 26 96 91 91 RIGHT 74 735 735 735 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 55 598 598 598 65 E 543 A State of ( . errnont AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Depaitrnent of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Reueation Department of Watef Resowc(!s & Environrnentul Fnq,ne,ering Natural Resources Consr.i /,ition Council April 29, 1988 LTH Associates 1185 Shelburne Road Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office III West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Larkin: RE: Case No. PB-4-1451; construction of community care home'on Lots 7 and 8 of Bartlett Subdivision, arbor View Road, So Burlington. Our office has completed an initial review of the above referenced project and has determined that the additional information listed below will be needed before approval can be granted. This was communicated by telephone on April 20, 1988 to Bob Krebs. (1) A breakdown of the proposed sewage flows is necessary for proper review. (2) The Health Department must be contacted regarding the proposed water line extension. (3) The Subdivision Permit No. 4CO526 creating Lots 7 and 8 must be amended to combine the two lots into one. Upon receipt of the above items, we shall continue our review. Should there be any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, f_� Marsha J. Thomps n Assistant Regional Eng'i,neer MJT/kaa CC: City of South Burlington Krebs and Lansing Lou Borie Stag: of Vermont Public Building & Subdivision Permit LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. PB-4-1451 & EC-4-1287 Chapter 3, Subdivisions APPLICANT LTH Associates Chapter 4, Public Buildings ADDRESS 1185 Shelburne Road Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal So. Burlington, VT 05403 Chapter 8, Water Supply This project, consisting of combining Lots 7 and 8 into one Lot No. 7-8 (2.53 acres) and construction of the Harbor View Community Care Center with municipal water and sewer services located on Harbor View Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4C0526-7. GENERAL (1) This permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Harbor View Community Care Center Sheet 1 "Site Utilities" dated 11/87 last revised 3/7/88; Sheet 3 "Details" dated 1/88 revised 3/9/88 and "Commercial Lots, Bartlett Property" dated 4/83 last revised 5/4/88 prepared by Robert Krebs, P.E. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (3) Each prospective purchaser of the lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. WATER SUPPLY (4) The project is approved for water supply by construction and utilization of the municipal water service depicted on the approved plans. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection. (5) The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Department of Health's "Letter of Approval" to John Larkin dated July 29, 1988. SEWAGE DISPOSAL (6) The project is approved for wastewater disposal by connection to the City of South Burlington municipal sewer system. No other method of wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. (7) The project is approved for connection to the Bartlett's Bay wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 7235 gallons of sewage per day. Public Build( & Subdivision Permit PB-4-1451 & Eu-4-1287 Page 2 PLUMBING (8) This permit authorizes construction of the exterior sewer and water services conditioned above and for the construction of each building provided the individual water and sewer services to each building remains as shown on the stamped approved plans. Alterations to the exterior sewer or water services shall be approved by the Division of Protection prior to installation. (9) Prior to commencement of construction of the building(s), the applicant must submit to the Division one set of interior plumbing floor plans which match the exterior water and sewer services. Patrick A. Parenteau, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By �%%�st-moo G2�- :)—, — Marsha J. Thompson Assistant Regional Engineer Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this q day of A 1988. cc: Don Robisky City of South Burlington ✓ Louis Borie Dept. of Health Dept. of Labor & Industry Krebs & Lansing State of Vermont CASE NO. APPLICANT ADDRESS LAND USE PERMIT 4C0526-7 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED LTH Associates 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 1185 Shelburne Road (Act 250) and Vermont South Burlington, Vermont State Environmental Protec- 05403 tion Rules Chapter 4, Public Buildings District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0526-7 pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands iden- tified in Book 184, Pages 316-319 of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to LTH Associates, the "Permittee" as "Grantee". This permit amendment specifically authorizes the Permittee to construct a community care facility on lots 7 and 8 of the previously approved commercial subdivision on the Bartlett Property located off Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont. The Permittee, its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the follow- ing conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0526 are in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. The project shall be completed, operated, and maintained as set forth in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Approved" and on file with the District Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of* this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing juris- diction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accord- ance with the terms of the permit. Page 2 Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0526-7 4. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittee confirms and agrees for themselves and all assigns and successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. 5. The project is approved for the following maximum cumulative impacts: 26 vehicle parking spaces; 7,235 gallons per day of water and wastewater; 161 vehicle trips per day; and 31 peak hour vehicle trips. 6. Prior to commencement of construction of this building the Permittee shall file either a Discharge Permit issued by the Agency of Natural Resources or evidence that such a permit is not required. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall comply with all of the terms and conditions of the Discharge Permit. 7. The Permittee shall apply and maintain calcium chloride on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until vegetation or permanent pavement is fully established to control dust. 8. The building approved herein is not approved for any manufacturing use or on -site disposal of any process wastes. The Permittee shall apply and receive approval for any change in the use of the building which involves the storage or handling of any regulated substances or the generation of hazardous wastes. 9. The Permittee shall apply to the District Environmental Commission for approval for any change in the use of the buildings and land which would cause noxious or unhealthy emissions into the air or injection of toxic wastes into the soils. 10. The Permittee shall comply with Exhibits #6, #19 and #21 for erosion control. Hay bale dams and silt fences shall be installed as depicted on the plans prior to commencement of construction. The Permittee shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. From October 1 to April 15 of any calendar year, all disturbed areas of the construction site shall be mulched until final vegetative cover is established. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintain until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Page 3 Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0526-7 Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. 11. The Permittee shall hire a professional engineer to certify that the erosion control plan provides a level of protection at least equivalent to the measures outlined in the "Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites". 12. Any area on the stream bank which is disturbed by heavy equipment in the process of installing the stone -lined drainage swale shall be immediately stabilized and reseeded following completion of the swale. 13. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall maintain a 50 foot permanently vegetated undisturbed buffer strip between Bartlett Brook and any construction, except the construc- tion of the stone -lined drainage swale shown in Exhibit #18. 14. In addition to conformance with the requirements of condition #10, the Permittee shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste materials into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittee from compliance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 15. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall install and maintain water conserving plumbing fixtures, including but not limited to low flow showerheads, low -flush toilets, and aerator -type or flow -restricted faucets. 16. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall continually maintain the landscaping as approved in Exhibit #14 by replacing any dead or diseased plantings as soon as seasonably possible. 17. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those approved in Exhibit #15 and shall be mounted no higher than 20 feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 18. The community care structure approved herein shall be constructed with insulation with an R value of at least R-19 in the exterior walls, at least R-38 in the roof or cap and at least R-10 around the foundation or slab. Page 4 Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0526-7 19. The installation and/or use of any electric resistance space heating is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 20. No further subdivision and/or development of any parcel of land approved herein shall be permitted without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 21. All construction on this project must be completed by October 1, 1989. 22. This permit shall expire on May 1, 2018 unless extended by the District Commission. Notwithstanding, this permit shall expire one year from date of issuance if the Permittees have not demon- strated an intention to proceed with the project. 23. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Section 6090(b). / 1f Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this CD day of June, 1988. By M. Lynn Whalen, Acting Chairperson for the District / #4 Commission �? Commissioner participating Louis Borie in this decision: District #4 Coordinator Helen B. Lawrence LB/MLW/aml E) BIT LIST FOR APPLICATION1 J0526-7 A = Applicant T = Town TPC = Town Planning Commission RPC = Regional Planning Commission ANR = Agency of Natural Resources C = District Environmental Commission xh. Date Entered Document # Received By NATURE OF EXHIBIT Date 1 3-8-83 A Land rse Permit Amendment 2 it it location map 3 it " notice - commence. of cons. req. permit 3-7-88 4 it " certification of service form 3-7-88 5 it " Schedule B - Act 250 information and list of adjoining landowners undated 6 it erosion control and construction sequence 2-5-88 7 It " erosion evaluation on problem sites and soil information undated 8 " " summary recommendations and conclusions, re: analysis of hydrologic impact prepared by Wagner, Heindel and Noyes, Inc. 1-19-88 9 letter by W. Szymanski re: municipal sewer 2-18-88 10 " " letter by James Fay, Champlain Water Dist. 2-11-88 11 letter by M. Poirier, Vermont Gas 2-10-88 12 " letter by J. Goddette, Sr., So. Burl. Fire 2-5-88 13 " letter by Chief John Race, So. Burl. Police 2-10-88 14 " " traffic impact information by North Co. Planning 10-29-87 15 " " plan - Landscape Plan and details undated 16 " plan - Exterior Elevations, A5 undated 17 " " plan - Exterior Elevations, A6 undated 18 " plan - Site Utilities, Sheet 1 rev. 3-2-88 19 " plan - Grading and Erosion Control Plan Sheet 2 (rev. 2-24-88) 20 plan - Details, Sheet 3 1-88 21 " " plan - Details, Sheet 4 1-88 22 " " plan - Details, Sheet 5 1-88 23 plan - Final Plat 24 plan - Commercial Lots 25 3-23-88 letter - re: project site history by Deborah Sherman, LTH Associates 3-21-88 26 4-13-88 ANR Entry of Appearance and Pre -Hearing Comments4-8-88 27 undated A letter - re: project description by D.Sherman 3-11-88 28 5-27-88 ANR Public Building/Subdivision Permit by M. Thompson, Asst. Regional Engineer 5-24-88 i l State of Vermont Public Building & Subdivision Permit LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. PB-4-1451 & EC-4-1287 Chapter 3, Subdivisions APPLICANT LTH Associates Chapter 4, Public Buildings ADDRESS 1185 Shelburne Road Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal So. Burlington, VT 05403 Chapter 8, Water Supply This project, consisting of combining Lots 7 and 8 into one Lot No. 7-8 (2.53 acres) and construction of the Harbor View Community Care Center with municipal water and sewer services located on Harbor View Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4C0526-7. GENERAL (1) This permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Harbor View Community Care Center Sheet 1 "Site Utilities" dated 11/87 last revised 3/7/88; Sheet 3 "Details" dated 1/88 revised 3/9/88 and "Commercial Lots, Bartlett Property" dated 4/83 last revised 5/4/88 prepared by Robert Krebs, P.E. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (3) Each prospective purchaser of the lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. WATER SUPPLY (4) The project is approved for water supply by construction and utilization of the municipal water service depicted on the approved plans. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection. (5) The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Department of Health's "Letter of Approval" to John Larkin dated July 29, 1988. SEWAGE DISPOSAL (6) The project is approved for wastewater disposal by connection to the City of South Burlington municipal sewer system. No other method of wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. (7) The project is approved for connection to the Bartlett's Bay wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 7235 gallons of sewage per day. Public Building & Subdivision Permit PB-4-1451 & EC-4-1287 Page 2 PLUMBING (8) This permit authorizes construction of the exterior sewer and water services conditioned above and for the construction of each building provided the individual water and sewer services to each building remains as shown on the stamped approved plans. Alterations to the exterior sewer or water services shall be approved by the Division of Protection prior to installation. (9) Prior to commencement of construction of the building(s), the applicant must submit to the Division one set of interior plumbing floor plans which match the exterior water and sewer services. Patrick A. Parenteau, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By j , /L Marsha J. Thompson Assistant Regional Engineer Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this day ofa 1988. cc: Don Robisky City of South Burlington Louis Borie Dept. of Health Dept. of Labor & Industry Krebs & Lansing