HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-14-36 CU-14-09 - Decision - 0020 Harbor View Road#CU-14-09 and #SP-14-36
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
WILLIAM SPALDING. — 20 HARBOR VIEW ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE & SITE PLAN APPLICATION #CU-14-09 & #SP-14-36
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
Conditional use application #CU-14-09 & site plan application #SP-14-36 of William Spalding to amend a
previously approved 21,012 sq. ft. 62 unit congregate care facility. The amendment consists of
expanding the canopy entrance from 145 sq. ft. to 345 sq. ft., 20 Harbor View Road.
The Development Review Board held a public hearing on August 19, 2014 and September 2, 2014.
William Spalding and Steve Guild represented the applicant.
Based on the plans and materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development
Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Applicant William Spalding seeks conditional use and site plan approvals to amend a previously
approved 21,012 sq. ft. 62 unit congregate care facility. The amendment consists of expanding
the canopy entrance from 145 sq. ft. to 345 sq. ft., 20 Harbor View Road.
2. The owner of record of the subject property is John Larkin, Inc.
3. The applications were received on June 30, 2014.
4. The subject property is located in the Commercial 2 Zoning District.
5. The plan submitted consists of two pages; page one is entitled "Pillsbury Manor Re -Design of
Entrance Canopy, South Burlington, Vermont, Canopy Re -Design, Al" prepared by G4 Design
Studios dated June 2, 2014.
Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements
No meaningful changes are proposed that would impact these requirements. The proposed canopy would
be extended to cover current sidewalk / paved space.
The Board finds that these requirements are met.
14.06 General Review Standards
The following general criteria and standards shall be used by the Development Review Board in
reviewing applications for site plan approval. They are intended to provide a framework within which
the designer of the site development is free to exercise creativity, invention, and innovation while
improving the visual appearance of the City of South Burlington. The Development Review Board shall
not specify or favor any particular architectural style or design or assist in the design of any of the
buildings submitted for approval. The Development Review Board shall restrict itself to a reasonable,
#CU-14-09 and #SP-14-36
professional review, and, except as otherwise provided in the following subsections, the applicant
shall retain full responsibility for design.
A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan.
Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use
policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan.
The Board finds that this criterion is met.
B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site.
(1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and
adequate parking areas.
(2) Parking:
(a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a
public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection.
(3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and
scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining
buildings.
(4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior
alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground.
The Board finds that this criterion is met.
C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area.
(1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common
materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing),
landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between
buildings of different architectural styles.
(2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to
existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed
structures.
The Board finds that these proposed changes to the entrance and canopy are consistent with these
criteria.
14.07 Specific Review Standards
A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision
of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto
an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to
improve general access and circulation in the area.
B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections
shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities regulations. Any utility
installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to
neighboring properties and to the site.
#CU-14-09 and #SP-14-36
C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including
compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened
with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enciosure(s). Small receptacles
intended for use by households or the public (ie, non-dumpster, non -large drum) shall not be required
to be fenced or screened.
D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. See Article 13, Section 13.06 Landscaping,
Screening, and Street Trees.
E. Modification of Standards. Where the limitations of a site may cause unusual hardship in
complying with any of the standards above and waiver therefrom will not endanger the public health,
safety or welfare, the Development Review Board may modify such standards as long as the general
objectives of Article 14 and the City's Comprehensive Plan are met. However, with the exception of
side yard setbacks in the Central District 1, in no case shall the DRB permit the location of a new
structure less than five (5) feet from any property boundary and in no case shall be the DRB allow land
development creating a total site coverage exceeding the allowable limit for the applicable zoning
district in the case of new development, or increasing the coverage on sites where the pre-existing
condition exceeds the applicable limit.
No changes are proposed relative to items (A) — (E) above. The Board finds these criteria satisfied.
14.10 Conditional Use Review: General Provisions and Standards
E. General Review Standards. The Development Review Board shall review the proposed
conditional use for compliance with all applicable standards as contained in these regulations. The
proposed conditional use shall not result in an undue adverse effect on any of the following:
(1) The capacity of existing or planned community facilities.
(2) The character of the area affected, as defined by the purpose or purposes of the zoning
district within which the project is located, and specifically stated policies and standards of the
municipal plan.
3) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity.
(4) Bylaws and ordinances then in effect.
(5) Utilization of renewable energy resources.
The Board finds that this project will not affect these five criteria.
DECISION
Motion by John Wilking, seconded by Bill Miller to approve applications #CU-14-09 and# SP-14-36 of
William Spalding subject to the following stipulations:
1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect except as amended herein.
3
1
#CU-14-09 and #SP-14-36
2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the
South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning.
3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 17.04 of the
Land Development Regulations or this approval is null and void.
4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to the use
of the canopy entrance.
Tim Barritt—
yea
nay
abstain
not present
Mark Behr—
yea
nay
abstain
not present
Art Klugo —
yea
nay
abstain
not present
Bill Miller—
ilea
nay
abstain
not present
David Parsons—
yea
nay
abstain
not present
Jennifer Smith —
vea
nay
abstain
not present
John Wilking —
yea
nay
abstain
not present
Motion carried by a vote of 4 — 0 — 0
f / l
Signed this I-clay_of .f e,- 2014, by
Tim Barritt, Chair
Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this
decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental
Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South
Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See
V.R.E.C.P. 5(b) (4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or
http://vermontiudiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing
requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address.
The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state
permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist.
4