Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0000 Harbor View Road
MARTIN K. MILLER JON R. EGGLESTON ANNE CRAMER KATHLEEN M.BOE MARK A. SAUNDERS VICTORIA J. BROWN SCOT L. KLINE PETER F. YOUNG ROBERT A. PINEL COUNSEL: PATRICIA L. RICKARD NEIL WHEELWRIGHT Steven F. Stitzel, Esq. Stitzel & Page 171 Battery Street Burlington, VT 05401 MILLER, EGGLESTON & CRAMER, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW!' 150 SOUTH CHAMPLAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1489�' BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1489 !lIJJJ TELEPHONE (802) 864-0880 (BURLINGTON) (802) 229-2218 (MONTPELIER) March 23, 1999 TELECOPIER (802) 864-0328 (BURLINGTON) (802) 229-2513 (MONTPEuER) RE: City of South Burlington - Planning Commission Approval 9 and 11 Baycrest Road, Jacobus and Bishop Dear Steve: Our office represents William and Nancy Jacobus and Christopher and Janet Bishop before the South Burlington Planning Commission. Mr. and Ms. Jacobus and Mr. and Ms. Bishop received Final Plat Approval from the planning commission on February 23, 1999. I have enclosed for your review a Notice of Recording which I have prepared as requested by the planning commission. This is a remedial matter approving a minor boundary adjustment made by Ireland Industries, Inc., a prior owner of the properties. Mr. and Ms. Jacobus own 11 Baycrest Drive (Lot 28) and Mr. and Ms. Bishop own 9 Baycrest Drive (Lot 29) in South Burlington. The two lots are part of the Bartlett Property subdivision. In 1985 Ireland Industries, Inc. purchased the two lots from the original developer, built houses on each lot, and recorded a plan changing the common boundary. Unfortunately, Ireland Industries, Inc. did not obtain city approval of the boundary adjustment. Ireland Industries, Inc. subsequently conveyed the lots, as revised, to the Bishops and Jacobus' predecessors in title. Mr. and Ms. Jacobus and Mr. and Ms. Bishop have sought the city approval which should have been obtained by Ireland Industries, Inc. in 1985. The South Burlington Planning Commission on February 23, 1998 granted Mr. and Ms. Jacobus and Mr. and Ms. Bishop final plat approval for the boundary adjustment shown in the 1985 plan. The Planning Commission decided to stamp and sign the 1985 plan, instead of recording a new plan, and requested that we prepare a document for recording in the land records explaining its decision. I have prepared the enclosed Notice of Recording following the Planning Commission's request. The enclosed document is based on a notice forwarded by the South MILLER, EGGLESTON & CRAMER, LTD. Steven F. Stitzel, Esq. March 23, 1999 Page 2 Burlington Planning and Zoning Office which was used by the Planning Commission for a somewhat similar matter in 1998. Please call me if you have any questions or requested changes to the enclosed Notice of Recording. I am sending a copy of this letter and the enclosures to Joe Weith and Ray Belair at the South Burlington Planning and Zoning office. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, �m Neil Wheelwright For the Firm N W:cam\Neil-Jacobus Enclosure cc: Joe Weith Raymond Belair William and Nancy Jacobus Christopher and Janet Bishop David Greenberg, Esq. #SD-99-06 FINDINGS OF FACT & DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of William and Nancy Jacobus and Christopher and Janet Bishop, to amend a planned residential development consisting of 97 multi -family units and 45 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of adjusting the property line between two (2) developed lots, 9 and I 1 Bay Crest Road. On the "' day of February, 1999, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the request of William and Nancy Jacobus and Christopher and Janet Bishop for revised final plat approval under Section 204 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations based on the following findings: 1. This project consists of amending a previously approved planned residential development for a boundary line adjustment between two (2) developed lots. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 12/28/98 granted a variance from the side yard setback requirement for the dwelling on lot #28. The sketch plan was reviewed on 1 / 12/99. 2. These properties located at 9 Bay Crest Road (lot #29) and 11 Bay Crest Road (lot #28) lie within the R2 District. They are bounded on the north, east and west by residences and on the south by Bay Crest Road. 3. Access: Each lot has a curb cut on Bay Crest Road. No changes proposed. 4. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size requirement is currently 19,000 square feet. The proposal is to reduce the size of lot #29 from 16,877 square feet to 16,483 square feet. The Planning Commission,may approve this reduction in lot size under Section 8.404 of the zoning regulations. 5. The minimum frontage requirement is currently 100 ft. The proposal is to reduce the frontage of lot #29 from 100 feet to 95 feet and increase the frontage of lot #28 from 90 feet to 95 feet. These resulting frontages are consistent with the other lots in the development. The Planning Commission may approve this reduction in frontage under Section 8.404 of the zoning regulations. 6. The proposed lot sizes are consistent with other lots in the development. 7. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage for lot #28 is 19% and for lot 929 is13.7% (maximum allowed is 20%). Overall coverages appear to be met. 8. Side setback requirements for lot #28 are not met as a result of where the building was built and not because of the boundary adjustment. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 12/28/98 granted a variance from the side setback requirements for the house on lot #28 as was originally constructed. The house on lot #29 meets the setback requirements. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the final plat application of William and Nancy Jacobus and Christopher and Janet Bishop to amend a planned residential development consisting of 97 multi -family units and 45 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of adjusting the property line between two (2) developed lots, 9 and 11 Bay Crest Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Plat of Survey of: Lot No. 28 & Lot No. 29 Bartlett Property South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Henry J. Swider, dated August 21, 1985. This approval will officially approve the plat recorded in map volume 166, page 49 of the South Burlington Land Records subject to the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission shall stamp and sign the plat recorded in map volume 166, page 49 of the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Prior to the Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission stamping and signing the recorded plat, a legal document shall be recorded which explains the Planning Commission's action regarding this approval. This legal document shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. Chairman or Clerk South Burlington Planning Commission 22%j Date Pa STEVENF. STITZEL PATTIR.PAGE* ROBERT E.FLETCHER IOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M.EUSTACE ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICECIDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPF. COM) WRITER'S E-MAIL (SSTITZEL@FIRMSPF.COM) March 29, 1999 Mr. Joe Weith City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Jacobus/Bishop Plat Approval Dear Joe: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W.CERNOSIA I have reviewed the attached Notice of Recording regarding the above -referenced matter. It is suitable for execution and recording. Sincerely, i s Steven F. Stite SFS/gmt Enclosure cc: Neil Wheelwright, Esq. SON3968.COR NOTICE OF RECORDING WHEREAS, on February 23, 1999 the City of South Burlington Planning Commission granted final plat approval on the application of William and Nancy Jacobus and Christopher and Janet Bishop to amend a previously -approved planned residential development consisting of ninety-seven (97) multi -family units and forty-five (45) single family units, Bartlett Property, Baycrest Road. The amendment consists solely of adjusting the property line between two (2) developed lots, 9 and 11 Baycrest Road as depicted on a Plat entitled "Plat of Survey of. Lot #28 & Lot #29, Bartlett Property, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Henry J. Swider dated August 21, 1985 (the "Plat"), which approval was not appealed and became final; and WHEREAS, said Plat was recorded on August 22, 1985 in Volume 166, Page 49 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and WHEREAS, said Plat had not been stamped or otherwise approved by the City of South Burlington Planning Commission when originally recorded; and WHEREAS, the owners of Lot #28 and Lot #29 as depicted on the Plat requested that this Commission grant final Plat approval to approve the above -described Plat in a legally sufficient manner; and WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission having granted final Plat approval relative to the Amendment of the Planned Residential Development and related Plat, the same having been previously recorded in the Land Records in the City of South Burlington, wishes by the adoption and recording of this Notice to reaffirm and confirm said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, Notice is hereby given that (i) the Plat recorded August 22, 1985 in Volume 166, Page 49 of the City of South Burlington Land Records shall be stamped and endorsed by the South Burlington Planning Commission as required by, and so as to satisfy, the requirements of §508 of the City of South Burlington Subdivision Regulations and 24 V.S.A. §4416, and (ii) the lots depicted on said Plat have been and shall otherwise continue to be subject to all of the conditions and restrictions contained in the Final Plat Approval which conditions and restrictions shall run with said land and be binding upon the current owners thereof and their respective successors, heirs and assigns, unless or until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this _ day of , 1999. IIn cam\NeilVacobus.No[ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION Chair #SD-99-06 FINDINGS OF FACT & DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of William and Nancy Jacobus and Christopher and Janet Bishop, to amend a planned residential development consisting of 97 multi -family units and 45 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of adjusting the property line between two (2) developed lots, 9 and 11 Bay Crest Road. On the 23`d day of February, 1999, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the request of William and Nancy Jacobus and Christopher and Janet Bishop for revised final plat approval under Section 204 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations based on the following findings: 1. This project consists of amending a previously approved planned residential development for a boundary line adjustment between two (2) developed lots. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 12/28/98 granted a variance from the side yard setback requirement for the dwelling on lot #28. The sketch plan was reviewed on 1/12/99. 2. These properties located at 9 Bay Crest Road (lot #29) and 11 Bay Crest Road (lot #28) lie within the R2 District. They are bounded on the north, east and west by residences and on the south by Bay Crest Road. 3. Access: Each lot has a curb cut on Bay Crest Road. No changes proposed. 4. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size requirement is currently 19,000 square feet. The proposal is to reduce the size of lot #29 from 16,877 square feet to 16,483 square feet. The Planning Commission may approve this reduction in lot size under Section 8.404 of the zoning regulations. 5. The minimum frontage requirement is currently 100 ft. The proposal is to reduce the frontage of lot #29 from 100 feet to 95 feet and increase the frontage of lot #28 from 90 feet to 95 feet. These resulting frontages are consistent with the other lots in the development. The Planning Commission may approve this reduction in frontage under Section 8.404 of the zoning regulations. 6. The proposed lot sizes are consistent with other lots in the development. 7. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage for lot #28 is 19% and for lot #29 is13.7% (maximum allowed is 20%). Overall coverages appear to be met. 8. Side setback requirements for lot #28 are not met as a result of where the building was built and not because of the boundary adjustment. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 12/28/98 granted a variance from the side setback requirements for the house on lot #28 as was originally constructed. The house on lot #29 meets the setback requirements. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the final plat application of William and Nancy Jacobus and Christopher and Janet Bishop to amend a planned residential development consisting of 97 multi -family units and 45 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of adjusting the property line between two (2) developed lots, 9 and 11 Bay Crest Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Plat of Survey of: Lot No. 28 & Lot No. 29 Bartlett Property South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Henry J. Swider, dated August 21, 1985. This approval will officially approve the plat recorded in map volume 166, page 49 of the South Burlington Land Records subject to the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission shall stamp and sign the plat recorded in map volume 166, page 49 of the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Prior to the Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission stamping and signing the recorded plat, a legal document shall be recorded which explains the Planning Commission's action regarding this approval. This legal document shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. Chairman or Clerk South Burlington Planning Commission Date K STIT7EL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P. C, ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGfON, VERMONT 05402-1507 �002) 6"2335 (VOTCuMD) S773vEN F, STIT7EL FAX (602) 660.2552 FATTrR PArP" 1;$4PJ,L�y,A�7,fi5(]aF'JPMZpF.CO:+�} R013ERT P. TI.EM ER WRITER'S.$ -MAIL (Ih4UEAN r�i .(rrAMSpF.00K 7U81'iN1d 5, McI.P.AN TIMO Tl Y M, FWTACn (",11.50ArsMrl'l'i:I)I04Y) FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET Date: March 24, 1999 To: Ray Belair Fax: 846-4101 R e: John Larkin, Inc. Sender: Joe McLean You should receive 3 Pagc(s), including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all the pages, please call (802) 660-2555. MESSAGE Transmitted herewith is Notice: of Recordini for your reNicw. U: cotNSRI, AIUILUIt W. CMN03TA 1716 inaasaga is intended only for the use of die ajdremec and may coitiaaia information that is privileged and con idcnlial. If you are uotthe bitcitdcd recipicnt, you arc licreby notified that any dimmination oflhis Communication is strictly prohihited. It you bawd received this cornmUnieation in error, plcw,* rwtify us immediately by telephone (802-660-2555). Thank you. M/? 6 'd c59�09KO9 'ON YVE Od NR0121E 3OVd 73Z1I1S lid Lt : K G3M 6661-t7w-M NOTICE OF RECORDING WHEREAS, on July 1.3, 1982 the City of South Burlington Planning Commission granted final plat approval for development of 40 residential acres and 30 commercial acres, as depicted on a plat entitled "Final Flat Bartlett Property U.S. Route 7 So. Burlington" prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated March 1982 (the "'Plat"), which approval was not appealed and became final; and 14REARAN, said Plat wao roaardcd on October 5, 1002 in Volume 173 of Plans at Page 69 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and WHEREAS, said plat was stamped and endorsed by the Chair of the City of South Burlington Planning commission prior to the date of its recording; and WHEREAS, on or about September 24, 1985, the South Burlington Planning Commission granted revised final plat approval for a revision of 20 units in Cluster D of the above - referenced development to 7 single-family lots, and 10 units in cluster C of the above -referenced development to 5 single-family lots, as depicted on an amended plat entitled "Final Plat Bartlett Property U.S. Route 7 So. Burlington" prepared by Krebs & Lansing consulting Engineer,, Inc., dated March 1982, lat revised September 3, 1935 (the "Amended Plat"); and WHEREAS, said Amended Plat was recorded on February 3, 1986 in Volume 200 of Plans at page 26 of the City of South. Burlington Land Records; and to/�o 'd ESROKH08 'ON R3d 33I10ZEI.d 3OVd 73ZI I IS Wd 9t 20 GEM 6661-�16'-6VW WHEREAS, said amended Flat was stamped but, was not endorsed by the Chair of the City of. South Burlington Planning Commission prior to the date of its recording; and WHEREAS, the majority of the lots depicted on said Amended Plat have been developed; and WHEREAS, Section 508 of the City of South Burlington Subdivision Regulations and 24 V.S.A. §4416 require that an approved plat be endorsed in writing on such plat, and recorded in the office of the city clerk within 90 days of such approval; and WHEREAS, the current owner of an undeveloped lot .in the above -referenced subdivision shcwn on both the Plat and Amended Plat as "Open Space 2.21 acres" has requested that this Commission re -approve the. above -described Amended Plat in a legally sufficient manner; and WHEREAS, the City of South. Burlington Planning Commission, having granted final plat approval relative to said subdivision and the related plat, and the same having been previously recorded in the Land Records of the city of South Burlington, wishes by the adoption and recording of this Notir_e to reaffirm and confi.rn, said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, MoTicE is HEREBY GIVEN that: ( i ) the Amended Plat as recorded February 3, 19BG shall be deemed to have been stamped and endorsed by the South Burlington Planning Commission as required by, and so as to satisfy the requirements of, section 508 of the City of south Burlington Subdivision Regulations and K to/Eo 'd �SR0 HOS 'ON XVd 6d bROEII. 3Xd 73ZLIS Mod 8t:�K UEM 6661-�E-M 24 V.S.A. §4416, and (ii) the lots depicted on said Amended Plat have been and shall continue to be subject to the all of the conditions and restrictions contained in the final plat approval which conditions and restrictions shall run with said land and be binding upon the current owners thereof and their respective successors, heirs, and assigns, unless and until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission. DATED at South Burlington, Vermont this 1999. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION Chair 30N1SI-REA 3 day of _ , �53�U9908 C�� 'd �3HOJEJ30d 73ZJTIS Wd 6b ; �o GEM 666 T-�2-&WfiQrbO 'd PLANNING COMMISSION 23 FEBRUARY 1999 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 23 February 1999, at 7:30 p.m., in the conference room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: William Burgess, Chair; Dan O'Rourke, Roger Farley, Gayle Barone Also Present: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning; Greg Rabideau, Bob Alexander, Randall Kay, Jeff Bayard, Alden Cody, Rick Landsman, Ed. Welch, John Kennedy, John Larkin, Dave Marshall 1. Other Business: t Mr. Weith said an article has been put in The Other Paper asking for volunteers to serve on the Design Review Committee. 2. Review Minutes of 9 February 1999: Ms. Barone moved to approve the Minutes of 9 February as written. Mr. O'Rourke seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Public Hearing: Final plat application of William & Nancy Jacobus and Christopher & Janet Bishop to amend a planned residential development consisting of 97 multi -family units and 45 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of adjusting the property line between two developed lots 9 & 11 Bay Crest Road: Mr. Wheelwright explained that these are lots 28 & 29. They were bought in 1985 by Ireland Industries who built a home on each lot. In doing so, they changed the boundaries between the lots and never got approval for that action. The present owners discovered the discrepancy. A variance has been received for setback issues (i.e., a 3 inch encroachment). No issues were raised by the Commission. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the final plat application of William & Nancy Jacobus and Christopher & Janet Bishop, to amend a planned residential development consisting of_97 multi -family units and 45 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of adjusting the property line between two developed lots 9 and 11 Bay Crest Road, as depicted on a two page set of plans, page one entitled "Plat Survey of: Lot No. 28 & Lot No. 29 Bartlett Property South Burlington, Vermont, prepared by Henry J. Swider, dated August 21, 1985. The approval will officially approve the plat recorded in map volume 166, page 49 of 1 PLANNING COMMISSION 23 FEBRUARY 1999 the South Burlington Land Records subject to the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission shall stamp and sign the plat recorded in map volume 166, page 49 of the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Prior to the Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission stamping and signing the recorded plat, a legal document shall be recorded which explains the Planning Commission's action regarding the approval. This legal document shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Public Hearing: Final Plat application of Timberlane Medical Center to subdivide a 6.03 acre parcel developed with a medical office building into two lots of 4.0 acres and 2.03 acres, and thereby creating a planned unit development, 35-55 Timber Lane. Ms. Cody said they have submitted all the necessary data. No issues were raised. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the final plat application of Timberlane Medical Center to subdivide a 6.03 acre parcel developed with a medical office building into two lots of 4.0 acres and 2.03 acres, and thereby create a planned unit development, 35-55 Timber Lane, as depicted on a plat entitled "Timber Lane Medical Center Timber Lane, South Burlington, VT," dated 10/4/98 last revised on 11/11/98, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2_. Pursuant to Section 10.404 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, the Planning Commission modifies lot frontage, setbacks and coverage requirements for lots I & II. 3._Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall record a "Notice of Condition" approved by the City Attorney which states that for zoning and subdivision purposes this property shall be treated as a planned unit development and that both lots shall be treated as one lot. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCH.ER, RCS. fA1701MYS AT LAW 171 BATTVRY STREET P.O, BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, V R,MONT 05402-1507 (802A "o-2w (volrmI rm) STEVTNr S:TULL FAX (602)600.2552 T-ATTIA PACK* rSQAIL(F1?-M2555®FIRP 4FEC.OVl) Ra113i1t7 11.1;LBTC;kSR WRITLR•5 B-MAIL QWLFtaNC23r1RMSYr.CQhfj 30610A S. MCLEAN 1NWHYM, PUSTACa f.'ALSC ADM J JTR..D IN N, Y.) FACSIMILE TFUNNS IVIITTAL SHEEP Date: March 24, 1999 To: Ray Belair Fax: 846-4101 Re: John Larkin, Inc. Sender: Joe McLean You should receive 3 Page(s), including this cover sheet. If you do aiot receive all the pages, please call (802) 660-2555. NIESSACTE Transmitted herewith is Notice of Recording for your review. Oi COUNSEL Ale1HUR w, CERN01rn 'Ibis MOSAgc is 'uitcudcd only fiyr!1 c we of die addronow md.z ay contiin inlbtrnalion that is privileged rind Conri&-itial. Ifyou are not IN ink:ndcd fccipicnk you are hcr:by notified That any diumnivation cf this eonununication is Ariody prohibited. Ifyou have rewivad this emununiealion in mm, pease nulify us 4nmc&ately by telephone (802-660-2555). Tliank you. t0/I0 'd cSK09KH V1 xvi Od HHUEId 3OVd �3 LIS WV SE:01 Q?M 666I-�E-�VW NOTICE OFBAC EDING WHEREAS, on Tuly 13, 19B2 the City of South Burlington Planning Commission granted final plat approval for development of 40 residential acres and 30 commercial acres, as depicted on a plat entitled "Final Plat Bartlett Property U.S. Route 7 So. Burlington" prepared by Krebs & Lansing consulting Engineers, Inc., dated March 1982 (the "Plat"), which approval was not appealed and became final; and WHEREAS, said Plat was recorded on October 5, 1982 in Volume 173 of Plans at Page 69 of the City of South Burlington band Records; and WHEREAS, said Plat was stamped and endorsad by the Chair of the City of South Burlington Planning commission prior to the data of itc rQvcrdin7i and WHEREAS, on or about Deptembcr L4, 1905, the South Burlington Planning Commission granted revised final plat approval for a revision of 20 units in Cluster D of the above - referenced development. to 7 single-family lots, and 10 units in cluster C of the above -referenced development to 5 single-family lots, as depicted on an amended plat entitled "Final. Plat Bartlett Property U.S. Route 7 So. Burlington" prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated March 3.982, lat revised September 3, 1985 (the "Amended Plat"); and WHEREAS, said Amended Plat was recorded on February 3, 1986 in Volume 200 of Plans at page 26 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and fi0/Z0 'U4 �SR09HH 'ON HE Od NJH01E IJ 3-DVd i3Z161S WV 9£ 0I GEM 6661-i E-NU `MEREAS, said Amended Piat WAS St&MPAC but was 11UL 61JdUs.bbad by the Chair of the City of South Burlington Planning commission prior to the -date --of its recording; and WHEREAS, the majority of the lots depicted on said Amended Plat have been developed; and WHEREAS, section 508 of the City of South Burlington 9%44divici.n Ana 7d V.R_A. 54416 require that an approved plat be endorsed in writing on such plat, and recorded in the office of the city Clerk. within 90 days of such approval; and WHEREAS, the current owner of an undeveloped lot in the above -referenced subdivision, shown on both the Plat and ,Amended Plat as "Open Space 2.21 acres" has requested that this Commission re -approve the above -described Amended Plat in a legally sufficient manner; and WREREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning CuumUss,ion, having granted final plat approval relative to said subdivision and the related plat, and the same having been previously recorded in the Land Records of the City ol! snnth Burlington, wishes by the adoption and recording of this Notice to reaffirm and confirm said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that: (i) the Amended Plat as recorded February 3, 1986 shall be deemed to have been stamped and endorsed by the South Burlington Planning Commission as required by, and so as to satisfy the requirements of, section 506 of the City of South Burlington Subdivision Regulations and 2 4 t0/£0 'd �SKHK08 'OM XV. Od 83HO EI. 30Vd 713 LUS WV 0£ :01 OEM 24 V,S.A, S4416, and (ii) the lots depicted on said Anended Plat have been and shall continue to be subject to the all of the conditions and restrictions contained in the final plat approval which conditions and restrictions shall run with said land and be binding upon the current owners thereof and their respective successors, heirs, and assigns, unless and until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission. DATED at South Burlington, Vermont this day of _, 1999, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING CODMISSION Chair SON161.RER 3 �0/%0 'd �99Z09KH 'UN XV] Od �NO,L IIl 3'M �1KIIdIS W� 9£ 0i Q3h1 Baba- z-�dW CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 11, 1999 Neil Wheelwright, Esquire Miller, Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd. P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 9 & 11 Bay Crest Road Dear Mr. Wheelwright: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on February 23, 1999. If you have any questions, please give me a call. me rely, Axll� Joe eith, Director Planning and Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl MILLER, EGGLESTON & CRAMER, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 150 SOUTH CHAMPLAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1489 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1489 MARTIN K. MILLER JON R. EGGLESTON ANNE CRAMER TELEPHONE (802) 864-0880 (BURLINGTON) KATHLEEN M. BOE (802) 229-2218 (MONTPELIER) MARK A. SAUNDERS VICTORIA J. BROWN TELECOPIER (802) 864-0328 (BURLINGTON) SCOT L. KLINE (802) 229-2513 (MONTPELIER) PETER F. YOUNG ROBERT A. PINEL COUNSEL: CATHERINE KRONK PATRICIA L. RICKARD NEIL D. WHEELWRIGHT January 22, 1999 Mr. Raymond Belair City of South Burlington Zoning and Planning Office South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Hand Delivered Re: Final Plat Approval William N. and Nancy H. Jacobus - 11 Bay Crest Drive (Lot #28) Christopher D. and Janet J. Bishop - 9 Bay Crest Drive (Lot #29) Dear Ray: I have enclosed a Subdivision Application for Final Plat approval in connection with the boundary adjustment between 9 and 1 I Bay Crest Drive. As we have discussed, the plat prepared by Henry J. Swider, L.S. and recorded August 22, 1985 in Volume 166, Page 49 will serve as the recorded milar for this application. I have also enclosed 5 copies of the Swider plan and one reduced copy together with a check in the amount of $85.00 as payment of the application fee. Please schedule this matter for hearing at the earliest possible meeting. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, Neil Wheelwright For the Firm c: Mr. William and Ms. Nancy Jacobus Mr. Christopher and Ms. Janet Bishop Atty. David Greenberg Enclosures �A, 5 -66 CITY OF SOUTH BUrZLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Nara of Applicant William N. and Nancy H. Jacobus; Christpher D. and Janet J. Bishop 2 ) Name of Subdivision Boundary Adjustment Lots #28 & #29 Bay Crest Road 3) I:.dicate any change to name, address, or phone number of ow,a, of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plzjt designer since preliminary plat app l i.cation None. 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units. property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preli.«inary plat application: None. S) Suhrmlt five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and c ntaining all information required under Section 202.1 0� the subdivision rebulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6 ) SUIhOdt two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. or contact person Neil Wheelwright /01 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Neil Wheelwright, Esquire Miller, Eggleston & Cramer, lid P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, Vermont 05402 February, 25, 1999 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 9 & 11 Bay Crest Road Dear Mr. Wheelwright: Enclosed is a copy of the January 12, 1999 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. _ Joe iYeith, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl PLANNING COMMISSION 12 JANUARY 1998 Mr. Weith showed the properties on the plan. He said the applicant subdivided the land into two fee simple lots and weren't aware they had to come for approval to do this. Mr. Dinklage asked if this subdivision would allow the applicant to do anything they couldn't otherwise do with the property. Mr. Weith said no. Mr. O'Rourke asked if some outstanding issues had been addressed. Mr. Weith said they had. A new survey was done. Parking is OK. No other issues were raised. 4. Sketch Plan Application of William & Nancy Jacobus and Christopher & Janet Bishop to amend a previously approved planned residential development for a boundary line adjustment between two developed lots, 9 & 11 Bay Crest Road: Mr. Wheelwright said they are correcting an error. When the lots were built on, the boundaries were recorded wrong. The boundaries have to be made official. A variance has been obtained from the Zoning Board for the 3 inch setback issue on the Jacobus lot. No issues were raised. 5. Sketch Plan Application of Frank Irish to subdivide a 38.3 acre parcel into three lots of 5.6 acres, 6.0 acres, and 26.7 acres, 200 Allen Road: Mr. O'Rourke stepped down during this application due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Martin explained that Mr. Irish is an elderly man who has lived in the farmhouse all of his life. Due to poor health and property taxes, he needs to sell some of the property. He will keep the pieces with the home and farmstand. John Larkin is buying the remainder and will have right of first refusal on the other two pieces. Mr. Burgess asked how the Commission could get around the 10 acre agricultural land minimum for the farm and farmstand lots. Mr. Martin said he hadn't been aware of this. Mr. Dinklage asked about the rec path location. Mr. Martin said it would be part of the Larkin plan when he has a development laid out. Mr. Weith said Mr. Larkin is aware of this. Mr. Martin said Mr. Larkin is also aware of the parkland the city wants to add to. Mr. Burgess noted there was also a stipulation that any further development on that lot would require a road to be built to city standards. Mr. Martin said Mr. Larkin knows this. 2 2/23/99 MOTION OF APPROVAL JACOBUS & BISHOP I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of William and Nancy Jacobus, and Christopher and Janet Bishop, to amend a planned residential development consisting of 97 multi -family units and 45 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of adjusting the property line between two (2) developed lots, 9 and 11 Bay Crest Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Plat of Survey of: Lot No. 28 & Lot No. 29 Bartlett Property South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Henry J. Swider, dated August 21, 1985. This approval will officially approve the plat recorded in map volume 166, page 49 of the South Burlington Land Records subject to the following stipulation: 1. The Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission shall stamp and sign the plat recorded in map volume 166, page 49 of the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Prior to the Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission stamping and signing the recorded plat, a legal document shall be recorded which explains the Planning Commission's action regarding this approval. This legal document shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. ORFT MOTION OF APPROVAL JACOBUS & BISHOP 2/23/99 I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of William and Nancy Jacobus, and Christopher and Janet Bishop, to amend a planned residential development consisting of 97 multi -family units and 45 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of adjusting the property line between two (2) developed lots, 9 and 11 Bay Crest Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Plat of Survey of: Lot No. 28 & Lot No. 29 Bartlett Property South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Henry J. Swider, dated August 21, 1985. This approval will officially approve the plat recorded in map volume 166, page 49 of the South Burlington Land Records subject to the following stipulation: 1. The Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission shall stamp and sign the plat recorded in map volume 166, page 49 of the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Prior to the Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission stamping and signing the recorded plat, a legal document shall be recorded which explains the Planning Commission's action regarding this approval. This legal document shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning Re: February 23, 1999 agenda items Date: February 19, 9 3) JOCOBUS & BISHOP — BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT — FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending a previously approved planned residential development for a boundary line adjustment between two (2) developed lots. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 12/28/98 granted a variance from the side yard setback requirement for the dwelling on lot #28. The sketch plan was reviewed on 1/12/99 (minutes enclosed). These properties located at 9 Bay Crest Rd. (lot #29) and 11 Bay Crest Rd. (lot #28) lie within the R2 District. They are bounded on the north, east and west by residences and on the south by Bay Crest Rd. Access: Each lot has a curb cut on Bay Crest Road. No changes proposed. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size requirement is currently 19,000 square feet. The proposal is to reduce the size of lot #29 from 16,877 square. feet to 16,483 square feet. The Planning Commission may approve this reduction in lot size under Section 8.404 of the zoning regulations. The minimum frontage requirement is currently 100 ft. The proposal is to reduce the frontage of lot #29 from 100 feet to 95 feet and increase the frontage of lot #28 from 90 feet to 95 feet. These resulting frontages are consistent with the other lots in the development. The Planning Commission may approve this reduction in frontage under Section 8.404 of the zoning regulations. The proposed lot sizes are consistent with other lots in the development. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage for lot #28 is 19% and for lot #29 is 13.7% (maximum allowed is 20%). Overall coverages appear to be met. Side setback requirements for lot #28 are not met as a result of where the building was built and not because of the boundary adjustment. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 12/28/98 granted a variance from the side setback requirements for the house on lot #28 as was originally constructed. The house on lot #29 meets the setback requirements. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPAr tfMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 19, 1999 Neil Wheelwright, Esquire Miller, Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd. P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 9 & 1 l Bay Crest Road Dear Mr. Wheelwright: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 23, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Joe eith, Directo PlaAning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls ovation Mom _ N.te i e i o7zbsw it rl � m, I Lot 2 I 07-24'319t9 R _ 772,29' T _ 5000' L Was' 17ANJB -I- ,cue7rw ROePI]S Su ley Notes L A /ocatl n surrey was completed by Krebs and Lansing A7 August I 2. New subd/vfs/on boundary ir7formatlon was taken from a map anti lot N 28 and Lot N 29, Bartlett Prqoerty" dated Aug 21, 198 by Henry d Swidvr LS 176. * Information regarding the ariglna/ subdiw'slon was obtained from a mop ent/t/ed Flea/ Plot Bartlett Prgoedy' dated March 1981 by Krebs and Lansing Consulting £ngb7eera * A cursory review of the property was mode by Krebs and Lons/ng In November 1998 RECEIVtp FEB 0 4 1999 City of So. Burlington Leend eR0eR171 Cv1WW1e maawnWt AXNld SROI XA prn Rpe &UW IAN.93 avvb D/ Pew nAk'71'19'iM L� cat fated pow P-prty Abe / I"t of way Lbaulated cvntwNw of rood -- &Jld bg setback (R2 zane) I 0' 20' 40' BO' 120' 80r Sco/e I Febuuy 2 1999 roc✓ nun. �^ AbwYMe' 7J, 1998 / M deck itai r ,efD s M^ Oote —4.d OOeb" ftba Location Survey Chocked Seas ,. _ �___ Bartlett Property Onto 8/JOiDJ....._ Lot ,f28 & Lot f29 ProJect AW.9S - 1.kVSINC Cbnmdj tW ~nessby Aa t'O Alain Shies# Colehealsr, Ferment 495f4B I« LOT We Z� 'Roles 1,r CT1 Y CLERK'S OFFICE So. Burlingt n, Vt. Via-, 198 r recevied for ecord at o'clock . =.IVI ;-and recorded in Vol. 1 of ..- r ... on Pae� (1'flrn:a., LOT W a 2 1$' 021 23` W r LOT We 28 14.,432 SQ.FT. 4*o LOT. WS 22 LEGEIJD N ?S0 02' 23" W 98.89 O (iZOh1 PIPE -- P20PE2T`/ LILJF- CF-OTE 2 LIUF- LOT O 0 29 ICc,483 SQ.FT. i5.0 B A`( C e ff S 'r 1:> BA,y. COVET (roo' tzoW) IS 30 GO GiZAPHIC 90 120 Cd,LI- -'#: � � :: s . ':�.. r ji,: • _ '.... ` r"�",t+G � �y� ��� { _ y.. - � � .. .-i � .y t i�+{ti�.>�,n .�. •�y�.:., i�p.: :N�YK� �,h,.'I' ..��..• i 1. $`.'..�.'' i?iokf -.-".� a� i"57i1A � .�j q.':t, ... I .. ).. .x. .. ►., uh. . QW ... LOT Qe 30 150 JAN 2 2 1999 of So. Burlingto; a I�.l O TE S THE DATA 00 THIS PLa.►J was COMPILED F201lllA A S(JjZQ I=y MAP EQT1TLED " RUA.L. PLAT, BA2TLE-TT P20PE2T1/" " DATED I,A,42CH 19827 AQC) Qd1 A13EeED 81139 8`i KZEBS A►JD LAUSIOCG CO►JSULT11_IG EQGWEE.IZ5 OF WIIdco5KI,VT. THE SU2VEY K,AS T�,EE►-.1 tZEV ISI=D W M-A THIS PLAQ B\/ HE-Q0\4 J. SWIDEQ, L.S. 0►,1 AL.1G_ 21,1985 , THIS SUQVE`10fZ 455Um,5 Q0 2ESPOWS1 F31LIT`I Foz THE OF THE OelGr I UAL LEE135 4 LAQcz1QGr SUP-\/GY, PLAT OF 5U2vE`/ OF_ LOT WQ 28 4 LOT Ue 29 BAPTL.ETT PZOPEeTY SOUTH 5UIZLII..IGTO0, V ECMOIUT PLAT F0P- IIZELAOD IIJDUST>? I E S 13U2L1UGT0d , \,/EZMOQT SCALE-- I" - 30' DATE = AUG.21, 1985 SUQ�IEy eEVISEp By. HEI,.12Y J. SWI�E2,L.5. ESSE�C ACT_ , VF 21.t0►JT �- 4"If D241.w ki 15Y GI20UK D12AFTQG SE2V. WI �IOOSK(, VEii=MO�.J T of V -'o co HENRY �J► J. * SWIDER No. 176 O Cy°�rTs��" �4 �,� SU R 9739(1)5: to the town of Eden on Vt Route 118 at 'tatipt 0+012.37 (mm 0.008) and extending north for a distance of 10708.58 meters to sta- tion 0+965.51 (mm 0.800) in the town of Belvidere. CONSTRUCTION BEING: Cold planing, resurfacing, pavement markings, guardrail and other related items. Plans and Bid Proposals may be seen and ob- tained at the Agency of Transportation. Montpel- ier, VT and may be seen at the office of J.A. Bushey, District Trans- portation Administrator #6, St. Alberts, Vermont. Minimum wage rates predetermined by the Secretary of Labor for the project are set out in the advertised specifica- tions and bid proposals, and such rates are a part of the Contract covering the project in accordance with Section 115 of the Federal -Aid Hsi hway Act of 1956. This Contract is subject to the Work Hours Act of 1962, PL 87-581, and implement- ing regulations. Contrac- tors must perform is work under the F La- bor Standards A (Fed- eral Wage -Hour w) as well as all Oh r applic- able labor t in- imum laboruck rates havede- termined bytate Transportaard and are set oBid Proposal. tors bidding on ject must be in accordancethe Agency RegThe Vermont Agency of Transportation hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively insure that in any contract en- tered into pursuant to this advertisement, mi- nority business enter- prises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in consid- eration for an award. The ,fight is reserved to reject any or all bids, to waive any formality and any and all technicalities in aids and to accept such lid as may be deemed in he best interest of the iwarding agency. ebruary 3 & 6, 1999 URLINGTON down- :)wn, 3 rooms, park- TNo pets. $480 & Incl. heat. 55-3728 or864-6825 NOTICE OF SELF -STORAGE LIEN SALE XTRA SPACE TORAGE ENTALS, LLC. 5 WILLISTON ROAD, 1LLISTON, VT 05495 Notice is hereby ggiven at the contents of the -If-storage units listed r\ 97-B King Street Burlington, VT 05401 JACQUELYN COLEMAN 313-3rd Street Greenville, MS 38701 DAVID SORDIFF 82 North Street Burlington, VT 05401 AYUMI KAMIDOZONO 1-18 Sakuradani Kamikazan Yamashmaku Koyota 607, Japan KAREN KHOURI 21 Dufresne Dr. Winooski, VT 05404 REO INTREST RICHARD OLSEN 70 Chestnut St. Weston, MA 02193 ULTRAVIEW HOME IMPROVEMENT LUKE TROMBLEY 8 Cardinal Lane Essex, VT 05452 NICK MCCOLLUM C/O 210 LaFountain St. Winooski, VT 05404 WILLIAM RINGWING 20 Pioneer Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 TRACYLEE PAQUETTE 181 Kirby Rd. So. Burlington, VT 05403 BARBARA POIRIER 185 Elmwood Ave Burlington, VT 05401 JUNG IL LEE K-4 pd+rtevPDf - '� urlington, VT 05403 CATHERINE BESSETTE 36 LaFountain Street Burlington, VT 05401 February 6 & 13, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, February 23, 1999, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Preliminary plat ap- plication of John Larkin, Inc. to amend a planned unit development consis- ting of a 200 room hotel and restaurant, 1720 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of constructing a 4-story, 60 room hotel in a sepa- rate building. 2) Final plat applica- tion of William and Nancy Jacobus, and Christo- pher and Janet Bishop, to amend a planned resi- dential development con- sisting of 97 multi -family units and 45 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of adjusting the property line between two (2) de- veloped lots, 9 and 11 BaCrest Road. % Final plat appiica- lion of Timberfane Med- ical Center to subdivide a 6.03 acre parcel devel- oped with a medical of- fice building into two (2) lots of 4.0 acres and 2.03 acres, and thereby create a planned unit de- velopment, 35-55 Timber Lane. 4) Final plat applica- tion of Highlands Devel- opment Company, LLC & JAM GOLF, LLC to IDU Airport Drive. Richard Ward +" -1g Administrative lr February 6, 1999 The Fletcher Free Library in the City of Burlington is planning to add steel shelving. Inter- ested suppliersfinstaliers may pick up bid docu- ments from Anita Dani- gelis at Fletcher Free Li- brarryy on or after Feb. 11. 1999. Bids are due on Friday, Feb. 26, 1999 at 3:30 p.m. Direct all ques- tions to Bob Duncan, Duncan-Wisniewski Ar- chitecture, Burlington, VT (802) 864-6693. February 5, 6, 7, 1999 rax resume to Jim at (802)864-3045. Accounting ASSISTANT CONTROLLER TV station needs experi- enced accountant to as- sist controller with main- frame general ledger maintenance. Proficient in Excel and accounting de- gree required. Send re- sume to: Assistant Con- troller Search, WPTZTV, 5 Ulevision Dr., Platts- bu . N.Y.12901. EDE. MIMSTRATIVE ASSISTANT P contract position at IB 20 - 30 hrs./wk. eo experience a plus d flingg Fax resume to so9)985-6772 or mail to TRS, PO Box 566, Marlton, NJ 08053. 3147 or call 877-6756 to schedule an interview. Af`tISTRATIVE RVICES: Sch, equires well -or- ganized, self -motivated person to fill the position of Registrar for the St. Albans area. Must pos- sess University degree and good oral & written communication skills. Please call David Astrof at 1-800-435-5338. ALL -SEASON BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE Minimum 1 yr. experi- ence, mechanical apti- tude, dean driving re- cord, ability to work well with little supervision. Send resume and salary requirements to Free Press Box #189 by 2/21. BILLING CLERK If you have a minim mg m an accountit superior customer 9 tunity to join our A th basic data ent cellent benefits p S d cover letter/ r R ources Director C lege St. , Burlin to frill -time opening n of two years' experience work - Jr billing environment as well as ice skills, we offer a great oppor- )unting Department. Experience and 10- key calculator required. :age. me to: Barbara J. Ross, Human f he Burlington Free Press, 191 �, VT 05401. The B.Aiir ton Fla 4,, is an Equal Oppo u.,y Entplo', value divenir anwr g our and rea rwe the suwess deem& on famerM an mvitormwu when all employees :art contribute to dicer fullest powntmi EST New England Air Sj Mechanical C,ontra< Vermont and neigt expanding our estii Looking for experk with individuals wit assisted estimatior trade background to train successfuli We offer very comp fits package incluc Insurance, 401(k).l plan along with an 1 cations will be kept please submit resu New BI TORS is a Full Service Design/Build rving a wide base of clients in 3 states, and we are currently I department. design/build estimator, along erience performing computer eys and material take -offs. A be helpful, but we are willing ints. wages and an excellent bene- nedical/dental insurance, life 1d match, in-house incentive se training program. All appli- fidence, interested candidates Air Systems, Inc. ce Box 525 i, VT 05495 Watch your business grow. Advertise in our daily "Services" Di- rectory. Call 658-3321 or 1-800-427-3125. ARCHITECT Wanted to work on com- mercial and residential projects. Autocad exper. req. Send resume to: Ernest Ruskey R&K Assoc. P.O. Box 1191 Stowe, VT 05672. Assistant Manager/ Cashiers 1800 Williston Rd. Full time. Nights, week- ends. Call Jeff 864-1519 ext 344 up an apphc (Alburg, Grand Isle, Isle Lamar This supe—so- union, cumi—ed of five car Live and experienced administrator to pruvid, Candidates should possess stntng culhi oriw Bible for, a Vermont Superintendents liceasc. been esoblished for the lxxition wirh contpct July 1, 1999. Send Imer of interest, resume, > of current ccrd ftcare. Superintendent S< Grand Isle Sul, 503R l'S I North I lero, %, Applications will be accepted until Lsm— i, e Our Circulation District Sales Manag• responsible for home delivery of The tract adult carriers, ensure excellent paper subscriptions within an assigns This is an entry-level position in news work independently with considerabl. have a valid driver's license and a rel. ty insurance. Compensation includes salary, month ance, mileage reimbursement and an Send cover letter/resume to: Barbara J. Ross, Human F The Burlington r 19.1 Colleg( )3 d' gton, VT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1.) Name, Address, and phone number of: a. Owners of Record: Lot #28 William N. Jacobus Nancy H. Jacobus 11 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel. 864-3 826 Lot #29 Christopher D. Bishop Janet J. Bishop 9 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel. 864-0439 b. Applicants• Lot #28 William N. Jacobus Nancy H. Jacobus 11 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel. 864-3826 Lot #29 Christopher D. Bishop Janet J. Bishop 9 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel. 864-0439 c. Contact• Atty. Neil Wheelwright Miller, Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd. P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, VT 05402 Tel. 864-0880 Fax. 864-0328 2). Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcel and proposed use(s). The applicants seek subdivision approval of the adjusted boundary between Lots #28 and Lot#29 ( 9 Bay Crest Drive and 11 Bay Crest Drive). A prior owner of both lots, Ireland Industries, Inc. recorded a plan adjusting the boundary between the lots but did not obtain city approval for the boundary adjustment. The properties have been conveyed using the plan recorded by Ireland Industries, Inc. The applicants seek subdivision approval confirming the boundaries as shown on the plan recorded by Ireland Industries, Inc. and set forth in the warranty deeds conveying the property. The subdivision approval is sought to resolve any problems arising from the failure of Ireland Industries, Inc. to obtain subdivision approval for the plan. The Subdivision Approval will not create any additional lots. The applicants properties (Lot #28 and Lot #29) each contain one single family residence. 3). Applicants legal interest in the property: Lot #28 - fee simple Lot #29 - fee simple 4). Names of owners of all contiguous properties: North: Lot #20 Rachel L. Nordell Peter G. Nordell 4 Bay Court South Burlington, VT 05403 Lot #21 Johanna C. Widlak Leendart M. Huisman 12 Keari Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 Lot #22 Jeffrey C. Reese Debra S. Reese 10 Keari Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 Lot #23 Diane J. Bell 8 Keari Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 East Lot #30 Edward L. Levite Lisa Gaioni Levite 7 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 West Lot #27 David J. Ross Victoria C. Ross 2 Bay Court South Burlington, VT 05403 5). Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.: The properties are subject to utility easements and protective covenants as part of the Bartlett property development. 6). Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.: None. 7). Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: The applicants are applying for a variance from the Zoning Board of Adjustment simultaneously with this application for Subdivision Approval. The variance involves side setback dimensions for Lot #28. Lot #28 and Lot #29 are part of the Bartlett property development which has been approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 8). Copies of the plans are enclosed. S nature of Co7ctPerson: Neil Wheelwright u Miller, Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd. P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, VT 05402 Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record b. Applicant C. Contact 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. `l 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8J x 11, 8J x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development. (Signature) applicant or contact person Date PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, February 23, 1999, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Preliminary plat application of John Larkin, Inc. to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 200 room hotel and restaurant, 1720 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of constructing a 4-story, 60 room hotel in a separate building. 2) Final plat application of William and Nancy Jacobus, and Christopher and Janet Bishop, to amend a planned residential development consisting of 97 multi -family units and 45 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of adjusting the property line between two (2) developed lots, 9 and 11 Bay Crest Road. 3) Final plat application of Timberlane Medical Center to subdivide a 6.03 acre parcel developed with a medical office building into two (2) lots of 4.0 acres and 2.03 acres, and thereby create a planned unit development, 35-55 Timber Lane. 4) Final plat application of Highlands Development Company, LLC & JAM GOLF, LLC to amend a planned residential development consisting of 244 residential units and an 18 hole golf course, Dorset Street. The amendment consists of relocating a mail box turn -out from Golf Course Road to Park Road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission February 6, 1999 MARTIN K. MILLER JON R. EGGLESTON ANNE CRAMER KATHLEEN M.BOE MARK A. SAUNDERS VICTORIA J. BROWN SCOT L. KLINE PETER R YOUNG ROBERT A. PINEL COUNSEL: CATHERINE KRONK PATRICIA L. RICKARD NEIL D. WHEELWRIGHT MILLER, EGGLESTON & CRAMER, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 150 SOUTH CHAMPLAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1489 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1489 January 22, 1999 Mr. Raymond Belair City of South Burlington Zoning and Planning Office South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 TELEPHONE (802) 864-0880 (BURLINGTON) (802) 229-2218 (MONTPELIER) TELECOPIER (802) 864-0328 (BURLINGTON) (802) 229-2513 (MONTPELIER) Re: Final Plat Approval William N. and Nancy H. Jacobus - 11 Bay Crest Road (Lot #28) Christopher D. and Janet J. Bishop - 9 Bay Crest Road (Lot #29) Dear Ray: I have enclosed 5 full-size copies and one reduced copy of the location plan prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. The street name has been corrected. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, Neil Wheelwright For the Firm c: Mr. William and Ms. Nancy Jacobus Mr. Christopher and Ms. Janet Bishop Atty. David Greenberg Enclosures CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 1, 1999 Neil Wheelwright, Esquire Miller, Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd. P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 9 & 11 Bay Crest Road Dear Mr. Wheelwright: F,nclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, February 12, 1999. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerel Raymond .1. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RIBImcp I;ncls MEMORANDUM To: Applicants/Project Files From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning & Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary comments, February 23, 1998 agenda items Date: February 1, 1999 JOHN LARKIN INC. - 60 ROOM EXTENDED STAY HOTEL - PRELIMINARY PLAT — the property on which this hotel is proposed is currently owned by the City. This land must be transferred to the appellant prior to the final plat meeting. — proposed landscaping is $13,834 short of Jhe $35,700 minimum landscaping requirement. Plan should be revised to add more landscaping to meet the minimum requirement. — provide front yard coverage information. — the landscape plan and site plan do not show same number of spaces proposed. Both plans must be the same. — a total of 66 parking spaces are required. The landscape plan shows 62 spaces and the engineering plan shows 60 spaces. Applicant should be prepared to justify any parking shortfall. — a traffic impact study should be submitted. — provide building elevations (all four (4) sides). — show delineated wetlands, if any. If none is found, provide statement from wetland expert to this effect. — provide details (cut -sheets) for all lighting and show locations on plan. — the final plat plans must include Heindel & Noyes recommendations regarding stormwater management. — applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $ 6300. — plan should be revised to provide an arborvitae hedge between the easterly most parking spaces and lot # 10. — the revised final plat should show the no.w. to provide access to 1700 Shelburne Road. JACOBUS & BISHOP - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - FINAL PLAT — the Krebs & Lansing plan should be revised to note the correct name of Bay Crest Road. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: February 23, 1999 agenda items Date: January 29, 1999 STAYBRIDGE SUITES - BARTLETT PROPERTY - SHELBURNE ROAD 1) The proposed 25 space parking lot near the easterly line should include a drain pipe under it to intercept the road ditch instead of surface drain across it. 2) The adequacy of the water supply for fire protection should be checked with City Water Department at Champlain Water District. 3) An easement should be given the City for storm water pipes that encroach upon the property for maintenance of these pipes if they drain City streets. BARTLETT PROPERTY - LOTS 28 & 29 - BAY CREST ROAD Plot plan prepared by Krebs & Lansing dated 8/30/93 is acceptable. TIMBER LANE MEDICAL CENTER - TIMBER LANE Plot plan prepared by Trudell Engineering dated 10/4/98 is acceptable. 3 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: February 23, 1999 agenda items Date: January 29, 1999 1) Y 3) John Larkin, Inc. 1720 Shelburne Road Dated 12/23/98 This building should have sprinklers, stand pipes and alarms. We are concerned about access to this building through the parking lot. Jacobus & Bishop Dated 1/25/99 9 & 11 Bay Crest Road Acceptable Timber Lane Medical Center Dated 1/25/99 35-55 Timber Lane Acceptable Memorandum - Planning January 12, 1999 agenda items January 8, 1999 Page 2 Setback requirements are not being met. The proposed property line will split the existing building into (2) parts. The Planning Commission may modify the setback requirements under Section 10.404 of the zoning regulations. In addition, the recording of the "Notice of Condition' will result in this lot being treated as one (1) lot. Lot size/frontage: Both lots meet the minimum lot size requirement of 40,000 square feet. Lot II does not meet the minimum frontage requirement of 120 feet. The Planning Commission may modify the frontage requirement under Section 10.404 of the zoning regulations. In addition, the recording of the "Notice of Condition' will result in both lots being treated as one (1) lot. Other: ---- the applicant will be required to provide the final survey plat on disk. ---- the approval of this subdivision as a planned unit development (PUD) will result in any future additions and alterations of the property to be treated as a PUD and not as a site plan. 4) JOCOBUS & BISHOP — BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT — SKETCH PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved planned residential development for a boundary line adjustment between two (2) developed lots. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 12/28/98 granted a variance from the side yard setback requirement for the dwelling on lot #28. These properties located at 9 Bay Crest Road. (lot #29) and 11 Bay Crest Road. (lot #28) lie within the R2 District. They are bounded on the north, east and west by residences and on the south by Bay Crest Road. Access. Each lot has a curb cut on Bay Crest Road. No changes proposed. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size requirement is currently 19,000 square feet. The proposal is to reduce the size of lot #29 from 16,877 square feet to 16,483 square feet and development The Planning Commission may approve this reduction in lot size under Section 8.404 of the zoning regulations. 2 Memorandum - Planning January 12, 1999 agenda items January 8, 1999 Page 3 The minimum frontage requirement is currently 100 feet. The proposal is to reduce the frontage of lot #29 from 100 feet to 95 feet and increase the frontage of lot #28 from 90 feet to 95 feet. These resulting frontages are consistent with the other lots in the development. The Planning Commission may approve this reduction in frontage under Section 8.404 of the zoning regulations. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage for lot #28 is 19% and for lot #29 is 13.7% (maximum allowed is 20%). Overall coverages appear to be met. Side setback requirements for lot #28 are not met as a result of where the building was built and not because of the boundary adjustment. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 12/28/98 granted a variance from the side setback requirements for the house on lot #28 as was originally constructed. The house on lot #29 meets the setback requirements. Other: — The final plat plan should note the correct name of Bay Crest Rd. 5) YING LIU — 11 UNIT PRD — PRELIMINARY PLAT The project consists of: 1) razing a single family dwelling and related accessory structures, and 2) construct an eleven (11) unit planned residential development consisting of four (4) duplexes and one (1) three (3) unit multi -family dwelling on a 2.91 acre lot. The sketch plan was reviewed on 5/12/98 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 311-315 Hinesburg Road lies within the R4 District. It is bounded on the north and south by residences, on the west by undeveloped land and on the east by Hinesburg Rd. Access/circulation: Access to the 11 units in this development plus the triplex and single family dwelling to the north of this development would be via a private road from Hinesburg Rd. Section 40 1. 1 (k) (1) (b) of the subdivision regulations allows the Planning Commission to approve a private roadway when the proposed roadway has a single access on a public street and could either require a public street, or make a determination that 15 units served by one roadway access will not have an adverse effect on the public good and welfare of the community. 3 MILLER, EGGLESTON & CRAMER, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 150 SOUTH CHAMPLAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1489 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1489 MARTIN K. MILLER JON R. EGGLESTON ANNE CRAMER TELEPHONE (802) 864-0880 (BURLINOTON) KATHLEEN M. BOE (802) 229-2218 (MONTPEUER) MARK A. SAUNDERS VICTORIA J. BROWN TELECOPIER (802) 864-0328 (BURUNGTON) SCOT L. KLINE (802) 229-2513 (MONTPE[.[ER) PETER F. YOUNG ROBERT A. PINEL COUNSEL: CATHERINE KRONK PATRICIA L. RICKARD NEIL D. WHEELWRIGHT January 22, 1999 Mr. Raymond Belair City of South Burlington Zoning and Planning Office South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Final Plat Approval William N. and Nancy H. Jacobus - 11 Bay Crest Drive (Lot #28) Christopher D. and Janet J. Bishop - 9 Bay Crest Drive (Lot #29) Dear Ray: As per your request I have enclosed five copies of the location survey prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. The enclosed plan is the same as was filed with the Sketch Plan application. Please call me if you have any questions or need any further information. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, 'AQ 1 Neil Wheelwright For the Firm c: Mr. William and Ms. Nancy Jacobus Mr. Christopher and Ms. Janet Bishop Atty. David Greenberg Enclosures MILLER, EGGLESTON & CRAMER, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 150 SOUTH CHAMPLAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1489 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1489 MARTIN K. MILLER JON R. EGGLESTON ANNE CRAMER TELEPHONE (802) 864-0880 (BURUNGTON) KATHLEEN M. BOE (802) 229-2218 (MONTPELIER) MARK A. SAUNDERS VICTORIA J. BROWN TELECOPIER (802) 864-0328 (BURUNGTON) SCOT L. KLINE (802) 229-2513 (MONTPEu m) PETER R YOUNG ROBERT A. PINEL COUNSEL: CATHERINE KRONK PATRICIA L. RICKARD NEIL D. WHEELWRIGHT December 9, 1998 Mr. Raymond Belair City of South Burlington Zoning and Planning Office South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Hand Delivered Re: Sketch Plan Approval William N. and Nancy H. Jacobus - 11 Bay Crest Drive (Lot #28) Christopher D. and Janet J. Bishop - 9 Bay Crest Drive (Lot #29) Dear Ray: I have enclosed a Subdivision Application for Sketch Plan approval in connection with the boundary adjustment between 9 and I I Bay Crest Drive. As we have discussed, the application seeks approval of the plan recorded by Ireland Industries, Inc. in 1985 and used in the deeds conveying the properties. I have also enclosed 5 copies of the plan and one reduced copy, e ff oun o . Please schedule this matter for hearing at the earliest possible meeting. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, A of l wv'u 1�s Neil Wheelwright For the Firm c: Mr. William and Ms. Nancy Jacobus Mr. Christopher and Ms. Janet Bishop Atty. David Greenberg Enclosures .L. Surwy_Notes_ 1. A /.aorF.1 ,.r..y .af eanpJ.f.d Fy KreD.i nd Lnaiq i Augwa 7. C.andoy in/amofian faFn Fan O mqo nh Lot N 10 and Lot N 29, Bart/ett PM". % dotM Avg 21, 196 Dy1-1 d S.M. LS I S Mlmndfion r ga-gnq tM myna a ea'wva+ .o. oD bmn d mqo arrow Tha Proc Bo-nrr Prao.rtr" d9rd Lroar r982 9e9 by KrwD. nd Lmahy Gauaahg C,ryinepi I. A cu Y PrAP y .d. mod. oy K— nd Lnang in No.vnb- 1994 om' Ic ee' Bogy Sco/e m MARTIN K. MILLER JON R. EGGLESTON ANNE CRAMER KATHLEEN M.BOE MARK A. SAUNDERS VICTORIA J. BROWN SCOT L. KLINE PETER F. YOUNG ROBERT A. PINEL COUNSEL: CATHERINE KRONK PATRICIA L. RICKARD NEIL D. WHEELWRIGHT MILLER, EGGLESTON & CRAMER, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 150 SOUTH CHAMPLAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1489 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1489 December 28, 1998 Mr. Raymond Belair City of South Burlington Zoning and Planning Office South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 TELEPHONE (802) 864-0880 (BURLINGTON) (802) 229-2218 (MONTPELIER) TELECOPIER (802) 864-0328 (BURLINGTON) (802) 229-2513 (MONTPEIER) Re: Sketch Plan Approval William N. and Nancy H. Jacobus - I I Bay Crest Drive (Lot #28) Christopher D. and Janet J. Bishop - 9 Bay Crest Drive (Lot #29) Dear Ray: I am writing in response to your letter dated December 23, 1998. Krebs and Lansing have calculated building lot coverage for Lot #28 as 19.0 % and 13.7 % for Lot #29. Please call me if you have any questions or need any further information. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, Neil Wheelwright For the Firm c: Mr. William and Ms. Nancy Jacobus Mr. Christopher and Ms. Janet Bishop Atty. David Greenberg I ,•„H?q:N .yr,��`.. .r y. .q. ... ;;p_.4 ryr.. .,I^.[y��:",£��1IIp�pit .Y, '� t. wt �,ic , . . _ .. I„� �'3i�'��Y's`S 't, }- p�y� �i� "^+!` , .f _.. .. _.. t .�.a�a r� •.`t� LOT Kit 2 2 i t L0�' 2 I a� LEG E I..l D "OZ' 23WW 02,2'I p I IZOIJ PIPE P20PE2T`/ LI►JE - Cr--QTE 2 WJE LOT ► ,2V �oI A I �P C� , CLERK'S OFFICE So. Burlingt n, Vt. 1955 recevied for Fecord at,o'clock w. �._ Wand recorded in Vol.1 of tit on pa e ., A�te Clerk h.P +7,t 0 D.0I )T IJ 2 29 Iw,483 SQ.FT. �5.0 (aAY C)aEs7- BA,Y. COURT (COO, IZ 0\Aj) O 30 GO 90 120 150 14 1 C 'S C'4 LE t� d� �� � 4 .XN, .> CAI• •Ir'�O� ►._l O T E 5 ui THE VAT4 00 TW S PLA.W WAS O 1•/% P I L F-- D F O A F-- I/ M A EQT17L.ED "* 1=1UA.L PLAT , 13A2TLE-TT P20PE27Y" , Da.TED MARCH 19,52 /-\QC) QLME3EeED 81139 53 ICeEBS A1.J LOT Q9 30 LA►J51 JCG CO►.1SULT1QG EQG)►JEE25 OF WI000SK I , VT. THE SUEVEY PAS E EF-d iZZEv tSED W ITI- T41S PLAQ 5\/ HEk12\/ J. SWIDEIZ_,L.S. 01.l sjjC - Z1,1955 _ THIS SU2VE OZ 4,.SSU"5 IJO 2ESFYbWSI BILIT"1 FOAL. THE ACCUiZQ,C-/ O THE OP-IG-r I QAL LifZE135 4 LAOSIOGr 502VE PLAT OF SU2VE`/ OF: LOT Qe 28 4 LOT US' Z9 BAPT L ETT PIZOPE e.TY SOUTH 5UIZ1-1�JGT01_1, `IEEMOUT PLAT FOZ IZELA,QD IUDUSTZI E 5 BUeLlIJGTOU \/EIZMOQT I SCALE = I" - 30' DATE = AUG. 21, 19 8 SU2\JEy iZEV(SED By= HEIJfZ`i J.5WIDE2,L-5. E5SEu .ACT_ , \/F_IZ1 C-)07 Dear/ �1 av GI 20Ll x UZ4FT1►JG sEIZV_ WI dOO`31C1 , `IEZ-MOQ T �4 ;d 0.1 CO HENRY SWIDER = No. 176 f,0/8TIO!6O Q` Nun, 1 t'A '>�WLOII l y� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PI ANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 8, 1999 Neil Wheelwright, Esquire Miller, Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 9 & 11 Bay Crest Road Dear Mr. Wheelwright: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, dw�"7 � /2;� Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls S1 7F SOU BURLING R's" fty 5IELBURN a. 4 o cv tlQn YOP ^L,x Q'nMJ7& qn 3t' R = 772,29' T L 1. A location survey was completed by Krebs old Lonsing in August 1993 2 Now subdUSiOn boundary information was token from a map entitled Lot IV 28 and Lot N 29, Bartlett Property" doted Aug 21, 1985 by Henry J. Swider LS 176. J. Information regarding the original subdivision was obtained from a MOP entitled "Flhol Plat, Bartlett Property' doted March 1982 by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers 4. A cursory review of the property was made by Krebs and LonsIng in November 1999 rRyl Lot 40720SW Lot 27 Neighborhood Pork 4• — -- --------- R.Iorot, rood staks Wd con"t, Poo —IsAde s0tbOck 2' Lo—t 2-4 Mqmfar, House 3 x Poo M k19 )t 28 116, 6-9. Nov" 117 Lot 29 A.�4 I S1w1w.V la877 sqft._(Old), ,%, '011-ko Lot 34 Lot 30 VL. DEC 0 9 1998 ("dLV oi __ I-OgOl7d - - "ROMPM Gmcrofo flVx#rwt 1lxnd ,?0#7rA ~ POO found . TRWJV n7n&of POW cactwatod print rmpffiy Ihe / dytrt of way C&OL#omd csntwf*. o/ rood M11019 mtbock (R2 —0) 0' 20' 40' go, L?cr Scale I- = 20' In oars .W-d Design OtIn Locctlon Survey Dr.— (b Checked Bartlett Property Scale f- oot. 4013 _ L o 1 )#(28 cl, L o 1 #29 Pro _Oo�_j2qmt DrAm AW"S At LdVSIY'C COnMd1*W AWS*--' 10 Arain SWV*4 CV1VA*1"*r, 'V*rm—t ff"S DEC R8 '98 11:15AII MI4' PR EGGELSTON P.2/2 MARTINI JL MZL SB JON R. SGGLSS'rON KATB ERN X Sol MARK A. SAUNDXBS V[C rOPAA J. BROWN SCOT L =0 PETER E YOUNG COMM CATHRUM XXONX PAMUCM I- XXTARD N= D. VHEBLVWCW MtX.UR, EGGLESrON & CRAbaR, IZD. ATt0MVS AT LAW 1.50 SOUTH CHAW%AIN S'iAM pa BOX 14" BUPj.jNGTON, VERMONT OW2.24$9 December 28, 1998 Mr. Raymond Belair City of South Burlington Zoning and Planning Office South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 T11"HON)H (SD2) "4-0880 (BUALMOMN) (002) U9.2216 (MuNrram) TELEODPMR (802) 964-032e (Ruz u w N) (eat) 229.2513 (zXON"no w Re. Sketch Plan Approval William N. and fancy H. Jacobus -11 Bay Crest Drive (Lot #28) Cbristopher D. and Janet J. Bishop - 9 Bay Crest Drive (Lot #29) Dear Ray: 1 am writing in response to your letter dated December 23, 1998. Krebs and Lansing have calculated building lot coverage for Lot 028 as 19.0 % and 13.7 % for Lot 1029. Please gall me if you have any questions or need any further information. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, Neil Wheelwright For the Firm c: Mr_ "William and Ms. Nancy Jacobus Mr. Christopher and Ms. Janet Bishop Atty, David Greenberg DEC 28 '98 11' 15AM My -z EGGELSTON P. 1112 Miller, Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd. 150 South Champlain Street P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, VT 05402-1489 802-364-0$80 Fax:802-864-0328 FAX C 0 V E R SIRYEE'T FAX NUMBER TRANSMITTM TO: 846-4101 2 Pages Including lover To: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Of. South Burlington Planning and Zoning Office From: Neil Wheelwright Client/Matter: Sketch Plan Approval William N. and. Nancy H. Jacobus - 11 Bay Crest Drive (Lott #28) Christopher D. and Janet J. Bishop - 9 Bay Crest Drive (Lot #29) Date: December 28, 1998 COMMENTS: The information contained in lhis facsimile message is information protwkd by attorney -client and/or the attorney work proAct privilege. It is intended onlyfor Ac use of the indlvidual named above and the privileges are not waived by virtue 0j this having been sent by facsimila If the perso,: actually receiving this facsimile or any other reader of the facsimile is not the named recipient or the employee or agent respvnsibla to delivew it to the named recipient, any use, dissemination, disrrihvtion, or copying ofthe communication a stricrlyproh,ibited Ifyou have received this communlcatior, in error. please immediately notify kr by telephone and return the ari�inal message to us at the ebove ada`ress via US Postal Service, IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE TELEPHONE U5 IMMEDIATELY AT 802-864-0380. WED 11:37 FAX 80287"�33 BERGERO\ PAR-01S and FIT BERGERON, PARADIS & FIMPATRICK ATTORNEYS AT LAW 34 Pearl Street, PO Box 174 Essex Junction, VT 05453-0174 PHONE: (&02) 879-6304 E-IN7A]L: BPF@ESSEX. BPFLEGAL. COM FAX: (802) 879-6533 PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO: NAME: FROM: NUMBER OF PAGES IN TRANSNUSSION (including this page): 3 DATE: 10 OPERATOR: If you do not receive all copies or copy is not legible, please call our office as soon as possible. THIS TRANSMITTAL IS IN I NI DED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR )ENTITY TOVYwC`H IT IS ADDRESS$D AND MAY CONTAIN LNFORMATTON THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF TEE READER OF THIS TRANSMITTAL IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE TRANSMITTAL TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US Il1NIEDIA.TELY BY TELEPHONE, AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, THANK YOU. Z001 1 i ! i 20 I ► Lot 21 r an/sw ,o — I Lot 22 4Mop/e �? B����_ O." 9g89, r.o�z.rs++ !!ap/es 1 1 �y2' Locust � T � 1 Gaiogo \ Houso , t 44 �r 0 riov"`ate Lot 29 16,877 sq. ft. (o/d) 16,46J sq.ft. (now) 1 1 11/04/98 WED 11:37 FAX 8028796533 DD►\V1.1w.. . - OOte revisQd Description )esign whn )rcwn_ _ :hecked _ ;Cale _1`,= 20' gate :W/-P-L — _ Lind — aROAPniv Concrete monument found aROW7EA Iron pipe found � TRVI.�B i - Control point nNEW295Y3' Calculated point — Property line /right of way a cu ate centerline of road Checked I Date L 0CGtior7 Survey Bartlett Property Lot #28 & L o t ,�429 'ro'ect _ 31.44 Sf7y Crest Drive South Bu, diVSI" Consulting Fngivwen Inc. /0 1baz7z Street Colchester, Vermont 054V5 193144.dw4 City of South Bu-.22- -a Sn DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING 802)658.7955 December 23, 1998 Neil Wheelwright, Esquire Miller, Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 9 & 11 Bay Crest Road Dear Mr. Wheelwright: Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Monday, January 4, 1999. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincer , Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant PUBimcp Encls ZONING ,802)658-795d Memorandum - Planning January 12, 1998 agenda items December 18, 1998 Page 2 AUTOBAHN BODY WORKS INC. - STORAGE SPACES - BERARD DRIVE Site plan prepared by Lance Llewellyn, Inc. dated December, 1998 is acceptable. BARTLETT PROPERTY - LOTS 28 & 29 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT Site plan prepared by Krebs & Lansing dated 8/30/93 with revisions dated 11/23/98 is acceptable. TIMBERLANE MEDICAL CENTER - TWO LOT SUBDIVISION Subdivision plan prepared by Trudell Engineers dated 10/4/98 is acceptable. 2 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: January 12, 1999 agenda items Date: December 16, 1998 1) Ying Lui Dated 11/30/98 311-315 Hinesburg Road These buildings should have residential sprinklers 2) Timber Lane Medical Center Dated 12/8/98 35-56 Timber Lane Acceptable 3) Jacobus & Bishop Dated 12/9/98 9 & 11 Bay Crest Road Acceptable 4) Pat & Terese Ayer Dated 12/11/98 4 Berard Drive Acceptable 5) Frank Irish Dated 12/11/98 200 Allen Road Acceptable Applicant/Project Files January 12, 1998 agenda items December 18, 1998 Page 2 JACOBUS & BISHOP - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - SKETCH PLAN — building and overall coverage information should be provided for each lot. PATRICK & TERESE AYER - EXPAND PARKING - SITE PLAN — since the last application for the expanded parking lot was denied, the applicant must be prepared to show that the current application is substantially different from the one previously denied. — staff recommends additional landscaping to create a continuous hedge to screen the parking/storage area from view from the adjoining Pizza Putt property and from the Winooski River. — is the 3200 square foot portion of the building previously used for printing use vacant? — two (2) handicapped spaces required and only (1) space is provided. — indicate type of dumpster screening proposed. — applicant should provide a bike rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. — applicant should provide cut -sheets or photographs of all exterior lights. — show location of septic system. FRANK IRISH - 3 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN — the Official Map shows two (2) proposed recreation paths/pedestrian trails on this property running north -south along the 60 foot r.o.w. from Harbor Ridge Road to Allen Road and from Bay Crest Road to Allen Road. — this property is located in the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District and is subject to the requirements of this provision. — there appear to be streams and wetlands on lot #3. The final plat plan should show all streams and delineated wetlands with the associated 50 foot C.O. District/wetland buffer area. — the City's Comprehensive Plan calls for expanding the neighborhood park (5 to 10 acres in size), which abuts lots #3 to the north, onto this property. — is the 60 foot r.o.w. through lot #2 proposed to remain or be eliminated? 2 NIQUETTE, NIQUETTE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. RUSSELL F. NIQUETTE, JR. October 16, 1998 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 7-9 EAST ALLEN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1 WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404-0001 TELEPHONE TELECOPIER RUSSELL F. NIQUETTE, SR. 802-655-0575 802-655-1388 1907-1995 Mr. Ray Belaire Asst. Town Planner City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Bartlett Subdivision Dear Ray: I enclose executed sewer and waterline easement for recording. Sin ely,' Russell F. Niquette, Jr. RFN/blw Enclosures City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 Chris Bishop 9 Baycrest Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Chris: October 1, 1998 ZONING (802)658-7958 In response to your request to adjust the property line between 9 and 11 Baycrest Road, you will need to apply to the Planning Commission for an amendment to the subdivision application that originally created these lots. Since this development was originally approved as a planned residential development, the Commission has the authority to waive minimum lot size and minimum frontage requirements. It is not appropriate, however, for the Commission to waive setback requirements for the lots. The setbacks that were established for this development include 30 foot front and rear and 10 foot side yard setbacks. Therefore, your proposal to adjust the property lines will only be approved if you can maintain meeting the setback requirements. You will need to apply for both a sketch plan review and then a final plat review. You will need to submit a survey plat of both properties. The plat should show existing approved conditions and also the proposed new property line location. Once this plat is approved, you will then be required to record the plat in the City's land records. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Si erely, J e Weith, nterim Director ofPlanning and Zoning JW/mcp cc: Ray Belair AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES (ANR) AND ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PER',11T TOTAL # DEC PERMITS PRE-AF='_.CATION REVIEW RESPONSE DATE r� PENC `+G APPLICATION # DISTRICT TOWN rt'GtT! i%t�Lr it'd /t �:.'' PIN # j97- 021 OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: NAME. I4,71t"ill;, ADDRESS: TELEPHONE. 40 ) �616' " 4'-1 incari nn infnrmntinn nr—Ae lart hil (%L'77f %:<%K'ia;*4 APPLICANT CR REPRESENTATIVE. NAME:_ ADDRESS. TELEPHONE. rP_CPivAd nn '- l-/ SIIc;-] a nrniart wac ravicawaei nn a tr=e tttrnrtc of land of acres, located on 7 rt"3e'.'_ 71ji- - Iliad The project is generally described as: �G'i'• / �%r"it�r�lri' r��'/Lrc�.K�M�i Z / G�;�,ilt�i' 1Z' � ��-•t%.L'Cc'.'�i �l�4rC�/-�',. J'6h'Y/�y ,�'�"5 illriL',CC'' cc'; Trl /�lCl1L'1"4'.r>!t-C.- ZL'r-i"�',� ��liy'Ml „�•2✓L-X.' . Prior Permits From This Office: &d-q— i r^ PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)). Commercial, residential or municipal project? Length of ne-wiimproved road(s) Has the landowner subdivided before? When/where/# of lots AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: YES K NO: Copies ser, :c Statutory Parties: YES NO COMMENTS: IU6t Sv1 l p+LQ Z ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION DISTRICTS #4,6 &9 111 WEST STREET SIGNATURE: wso $b± DATE. alzll16 � ,-:CRESS: ESSEX JUNCTION,VT 05452 istrict Coo inator Telephone: (802)879-5614 2 ; WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERM17APPROVAL REQUIRED YES NO Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal ./'Subdivision &„ rti Deferral of Subdivision Tent/Travel Trailer Campground Mobile Home Park _=:ccr Drains (UIC) Sewer Extension REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: "k-1i6i�%'tr AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES � DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNATURE: '!L•'. .c.! 4 %y) "/Gt� .' DATE: �t f� yOGRESS: CONSERVATION Environmental Assistance Division 111 WEST STREET Wastewater Management Division Telephone: (802)879-5656 ESSEX JUNCTION,VT 05452 THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARCING OTHER PERMITS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW AND ON THE REVERSE SIDE. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-2413822) Contact: Discharge Permit: pretreatment permits: industrial, municipal Stormwater permits (state and federal, UIC) Inriirartriicrrharnanarmit C OTHER PERMITS AND REVIEWS YOU MAY NEED: '(Continued) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3840) Contact: Construction/modification of source Open Burning Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation Industrial Process Air Emissions Diesel Engines (= 200 bHP) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) Contact: Weil head protection areas Bottled Water New Hydrants Construction Permit, water system improvements Permit to operate New Source 6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hydroelectric Projects (241-3770) Use of chemicals in State waters(241-3777) Shoreiand encroachment (241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) Wetlands (241-3770) Section 40' Water Quality Certificate; (241-3770) Stream Alteration (748-8787r86-5906) Water Wit^crawal (241-3770) 7. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility certificate (241-3888) Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) Hazardous waste handler notification requirement (241-3888) Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444) Composting Facilities (241-3444) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) HW transporter certificate (241-3888) Waste oil burning (241-3888) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) State funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Ccnt-cl Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Contact: Judy Mirro 802-241-3745 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Contact: _ Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species; Stream Obstruction Approval 11. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office# Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Ame^cans with Disabilities Act) Sprinkler Systems Storage of flammable liquids, explosives LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more custcmers Boilers and pressure vessels 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors Program for asbestos control & lead certification Children's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: Child care facilities (241-2158) Residentiai care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) Nursing Homes (241-2345) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: Access to state highways (residentiai, commercial) (828-2653) Junkyards (828-2067) Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) Railroad crossings (828-2760) Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) Construction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Contact: Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) Slaughter houses. --oultry processing (828-2426) Milk processing facilities (828-2433) Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-2421) Golf courses (828-2431) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) Retail Sales/Milk,'Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE (800-642-3281) VT Residential Building Energy Standards (See Enclosure) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3226) Historic buildings Archeological sites 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liqucr licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) :0. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines) 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes: commercial vehicle Franchise tax/solid waste ✓'LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BLDG 10-18, CAMP JOHNSON, COLCHESTER, VT 05446 (655-0334) 25. OTHER: REVISION DATE: — Farm Date 11/9 Rev. 7I98 PLANNER 658.7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 May 10, 1996 Greg Rabideau 86 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Cluster "C" Revision, Bay Crest Road Dear Mr. Rabideau: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the April 23, 1996 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days (7/22/96) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please 've me a call. Si cere y� J Weith, Ci y Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: John Larkin / V/ t-o)- W r1l � 4/23/96 MOTION OF APPROVAL JOHN LARKIN I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of John Larkin to amend an approved planned residential development consisting of 120 multi -family units and 37 single-family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of minor revisions to the layout of five (5) duplex buildings on 1.5 acres of land (i.e., "Cluster C"), as depicted on a plan entitled "Harbor Meadow Condominiums, Bay Crest, So. Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated March 5, 1996, last revised April 3, 1996, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The final plat plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. a) The plan shall be revised to show the location of the bike rack. b) The plan shall be revised to show the boundary of the Spear Street - Ridge View Protection Zone. c) The plan shall be revised to indicate the correct name of Bay Crest Road. d) The landscaping plan shall be revised to reflect the revised building layout. 3. The South Burlington Water Department shall review the water service layout. 4. The end section trash rack for the 24 inch storm drain pipe shall be such that children can not remove or squeeze between the openings. 5. New curb openings shall have a depressed curb poured in place. 6. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission or Clerk prior to recording. C_,� 4/23/96 MOTION OF APPROVAL JOHN LARKIN I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of John Larkin to amend an approved planned residential development consisting of 120 multi -family units and 37 single-family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of minor revisions to the layout of five (5) duplex buildings on 1.5 acres of land (i.e., "Cluster C"), as depicted on a plan entitled "Harbor Meadow Condominiums, Bay Crest, So. Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated March 5, 1996, last revised April 3, 1996, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The final plat plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. a) The plan shall be revised to show the location of the bike rack. b) The plan shall be revised to show the boundary of the Spear Street - Ridge View Protection Zone. c) The plan shall be revised to indicate the correct name of Bay Crest Road. d) The landscaping plan shall be revised to reflect the revised building layout. 3. The South Burlington Water Department shall review the water service layout. 4. The end section trash rack for the 24 inch storm drain pipe shall be such that children can not remove or squeeze between the openings. 5. New curb openings shall have a depressed curb poured in place. 6. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission or Clerk prior to recording. Memorandum - Planning April 23, 1996 agenda items April 19, 1996 Page 2 C.O. Zone: A portion of the proposed street is located within a CO zone which can not be developed unless the requirements of Section 3.50 of the zoning regulations are met. Applicant should submit a written report addressing the criteria in Section 3.503(a) - ( e ) of the zoning regulations. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size requirement is 12,000 square feet. It appears that all lots will meet this minimum requirement. The minimum frontage requirement is 85 feet. It appears that all lots will meet this requirement. Recreation Path/pedestrian trail: The Official Map shows a proposed recreation path running east - west along the project's southerly boundary. The Recreation Path Committee reviewed the previous proposal but not this proposal. The Recreation Path Committee will be asked to review this proposal and submit comments. Staff suggests the applicant provide a 20 foot pedestrian easement to access the proposed open space to the north. School Impact: Enclosed is a letter from School Superintendent Bruce Chattman indicating that Central School can accommodate the enrollment impact from this development. Other: --- plan should indicate that the northerly boundary is the boundary between the IO District to the north and the SEQ District to the south. --- the correct name of Highland Drive is Highland Terrace. --- the open space lots should have some type of designation (e.g., common area "A" etc.). 4) JOHN LARKIN - BUILDING MODIFICATIONS - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending an approved planned residential development consisting of 120 multi -family units and 37 single family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of minor revisions to the layout of five (5) duplex buildings on 1.5 acres of land (i.e., "Cluster C"). This project was last revised on 6/27/95 (minutes enclosed). 2 Memorandum - Planning April 23, 1996 agenda items April 19, 1996 Page 3 This property located on Bay Crest Road lies within the R2 District. It is bounded on the north and west by Bay Crest Road, on the east by a City park and on the south by undeveloped land. Access/circulation: Access will be provided by two (2) 24 foot wide curb cuts on Bay Crest Road. The northerly access is required to be blocked with a breakaway chain or gate. No changes proposed. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 20% (maximum allowed is 20%). Overall coverage is 39.9% (maximum allowed is 40%). The buildings meet the 30 foot PUD perimeter setback in effect in 1985. The current requirement is 50 feet. The patios at the rear of each building will be constructed at ground level and do not need to meet setback requirements. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $20,000 which is being met. Plantings will include Littleleaf Linden, Maple, Hawthorn, Ash, Spruce, Birch ` Pine, Rhododendron and Burning Bush. The landscaping plan should`' be revised to reflect the revised layout. Parking: This project requires a total of 23 spaces and 26 spaces including a bike rack will be provided. The site plan should show the location of the bike rack. View protection zone: A portion of the property lies within the Spear Street- Ridge View Protection Zone. The boundaries of this �Z view protection zone should be shown on the plat., Other: The site plan should be revised to indicate the correct name of Bay Crest Road. jcnl" I 5) JOHN LARKIN - NURSING/CONVALESCENT HOME - SITE PLAN This project consists of the construction of a 60 unit nursing/convalescent home on a 2.55 acre lot. This project was approved on 2/14/95 (minutes enclosed) but was never built. Applicant should justify why this project is a nursing/convalescent home and not elderly housing units (i.e. multi -family residential use). 3 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: April 23, 1996 Agenda Items Date: April 17, 1996 LAKEWOOD COMMONS - SHELBURNE ROAD Plan received March 20, 1996 prepared by Trudell Engineering is acceptable. KWAN'S RESTAURANT - BENSON PROPERTY - PATCHEN ROAD 1. Restaurant must be equipped with a grease -grit interceptor 2. Sewer serving the three back units goes to White Street not to Patchen Road. HARBOR MEADOW CONDOMINIUMS - BAY CREST DRIVE 1. South Burlington Water Department shall review the water service layout. 2. The end section trash rack for the 24 inch storm drain pipe shall be such that kids can not remove or squeeze between the openings. 3. New curb openings shall have a depressed curb poured in place. LEDGE KNOLL - PHASE III - HINESBURG ROAD 1. There is no need for the Dubois Drive cul-se-sac. It should be eliminated. 2. Dubois Drive sewage pumping station, Lane Press pumping station, the force mains from both pumping stations and the gravity line on Kimball Avenue must be checked for capacity. 1 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Wallace Possich, South Burlington Fire Chief Re: Plans Reviewed for April 23, 1996 Agenda Date: April 17, 1996 I have reviewed the following site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. Lakewood Commons Shelburne Road Acceptable 2. Harbor Meadow Condominiums Bay Crest Road Acceptable 3. Kwan's Restaurant Patchen Road Acceptable 4. Ledge Knoll, Phase III Hinesburg Road Acceptable 5. Allen Road Community Care Allen Road Dated 3/10/96 Project No. 85086 Dated 4/3/96 Project No. 95158 Dated 3/25/96 Dated 1/23/96 Project No. 85083-5 Dated 2/7/95 Project No. 95100 As per last review ( 12/19/94) , a minimum of one hydrant is needed within the complex. Suggest the hydrant be located near bike rack area in northwest corner of complex, and must be on an 8" main otherwise, acceptable. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 April 19, 1996 Greg Rabideau 86 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Cluster "C" Revision, Bay Crest Road Dear Mr. Rabideau: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 23, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. rely, JOU Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls \ 7&V JJ -��� j ,/�--1477,s7mlY h�net bdr an htd /1JJ •`•� N ��� JO'x JO'rll7 hp --`'� I �9 j N/F City of South Burlington Se2 r u0,f�i 1 15 , hN.rNrt h + 141. J0 hwyr.�out + ?47.10 N.w aw Sboem TE m/ ma swr) 1 .0 Y �. --- — �— L ---- sas�zrsrw 77— - -—1dd78' 253-- r Zalo`'eTi-P�" - 1---252- 2SE -' dd •, {..J / ! •.�-- - __ _ _ ,1x„ �r /' ,a52_ �. _J .•� i u�r7s .:p 26ir3 -e �' i ✓' ' -M- 20' dnarogn idslv»Mt 15ox5 _ 2t� L..�/ j-�i to Me OV of S &uli7ptan. � �- Ilk v Lot 46 Ex. RA" - ?4dJs - p I f� I M out - 2J9.73 New Mx M: -40. I \ \ \ z•o�m \` -f /) ! don se�AorJ - 2.,7g0 ; y'�1 ` 712x0 tih \ I' VA \ _ txb 2 s7 2� k rr e.. N/F Irish �;d. t7ew ewtd 4wt. IP/akgw de • 240.7 . a htmv nut wf --- I / Y+. .-p lu°� ( Z,,Whg CMob Boeh 2 (to D..1) darn. and Lasavm LA7Qt 2 �, 2N ...- \\. i / I y RLn - P- f (+Wr N7.auJ £x. So- Atanhde ,t p L a t TV M w t 2 2JG?9 "! r I I f / ,Q 1 �� / \\ �I I 2 7 � 1 - -' x7 / /1 2 fjjj 4E a g�,.� N.w;.', h - 2.. (24 f New hW/t h - 241M (4*) MWf out + 241.38 (1No h.Wt out + Y41.92f 1 I I 1 I I '\ 'R -Nw 20' olnha�r �amw•t to the aty of S BwMplm. �wrky cat n er,.n v.r. la I 14, I A6 'yR 4 \ + j I'w-fi7.10 I \ 1H rwn e UW A / . �,,. 1 % I Bohr Tali I 1, w�t t + QJ7.Gd I Sµirw.111DION-1 I 2 1 —� }b �i a � aid 00 coBann LK?ds - 247W fc t / I � .. hNe't h - 141.27 Rkn - 244 98 M ,prt �YJJ�I- - - - -2i � T bract -25S50 „'hm 2.VW--.--- _-______449---� 46. N'^ III thO Lbldr Batt° t � hwtour+l+an ' -s47--------------zsdt7e'--�' } / I 2r Lot 50 e,neny � TBN 1J7 wre, er-n.--. ca"^ p°"h o'rtae abtdi ebrin l Rea'7d. Ixbtarp =' ,id, l� I, I J_ -R,*e -y 440 Bash J RM - 1450? (Nsr Ri» + 1470?] h 2406D �' I I / I / ledy wvet bdt on hyd/IJ! E7ev. 24ddd 2 /Pill - 244.95 -� 6 BO Crest Drive ! New?d ah*Wo to file of S an tn.nt hwrt - But New hwrf h - 24a80 (tank s CB A) h2�'-' s+ evukmw m •' hK ovf + 237.70 hr. h ( - 217.73 I .I :newt out + 14Q48 Locotion Moo P/annho and Zanfia Mofmatlon Ownx and dopiloa»t. _ .Mhn P. 404AI L N Assookotes 410 37N6urne Rood South 8uNM9ton, Vt. 05401 Arm: 66,J69 sf — 1.524 ocras 42t C9 vom92_ Lot Arno (1.524 avas) + 66,J69 sf SUMMys U,,256 of. Bubding Coremga - t' -1997X Park/r7y, Roods, Sidowalkx' - 1J,196 sf. Total Covaroga 7 156+1 r9B —J9.86X Legend - - AON" Rq srty Ciro — N — N —_ &ftav M(Yrw Lb7. 1--t4V S..e.- Lk,e - .c- --� Exist67y Goa [hs --N —a — Ph)--d Hotel Lit, P'oP +co S.- Lhe -E- - - - Existhy ENcrnc iYYYYYWIEdpe of woods -i' st-ey Cwntw Pohl -240 Eaiathq Contcv - z4b CmIo- 2ooa0 fbue� Grad, Aar V-tian ..�e.�.�..--•- hbw footh9 loin swA" I ° M✓. h.�(n/d% - 24QLt5 �m � r�ac i c - � J-1r-,c jpd �- +�I rrrk rIS I,Ff V'r�Y �fr. moN e�nn a-P7-YS r evdtwy Noe j a-la-los v.atlM h G1pNd P°fe era G. rbnwatre Site P/an I Drawn ,YEr eeneAavrrs d pdaNd o' 2040' eo !1a a.«w.aeN I cl.I. Harbor- Meadow i i I Z Scala /' + ?0' °t• AA:w" A 199d CondomIniums Bor SCOIe =20' Cluster B Project 95f5S vay owt Sa &Ahotm, v—f I "- wx & L,6VSIX6! Consult';,w BY{pinears, Inc. 161 Alain Street, Colohest`er, Yannonf 06*/46 TING CATCH BARN N/F CITY OF SOUTH Bud_mTON a("v '•� lk Ri E)QSTNO CATCH BASIN /STORM LINE \Ir STORM LINE CAP / � CB 8- Dl WATER MAIN SITE PLAN SCALE. 1' - I '-O- LOCATION MAP! � 5 LOT INPOAMTION: OHM OF RECORD: JOHN P. LARKIN/ LTH ASSOCIATES a 410 SHE.BURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT 05403 LOT SIZE: IL 66.309 SOFT / 1.524 ACRES COVERAGE. ACM f"AWABRE REAM a" SOFT IN i MV4 SOFT CM TOTAL LOT 2M SOFT Oft 2R W SOFT 004 is H LIGHTING PROVIDED: a 0 y + POLE MTD. IHCANDE3CENT (2 PER UNIT1 + MALL MTD. INCANDESCENT (4 PER UNIT) A O PLANTING SCHEDULE: 1-4 x p4 x TRSZS t ,1� • OF MARK COMMON NAME LATIN NAME SIZE REMARKS Yvd to a R TC LITTLELEAF LINDEN TILIA CORDATA 2-1/2 CAL. B" d i 3 AM AMUR MAPLE ACER OINNALA 2-1/2 CAL. B" 3 CT HAWTHORN CRATAEGUS TOGA 2-1/2 CA.. B" ' O x 3 FP GREEN ASH 'HARSHA.L9 MAXIMUS 2-I/2 CAL. B&B V SEEDLESS' PE/NSYLVIANIACA 3 AC SERVICEBERRY 15 C R Q' TALI US � O o DEi/ x I.a 55 4 PO WHITE SPRUCE PICEA GLAl1CA 6-0' TALL BOUII"TIMXN PLANTIMIlls F • 4F MARK COMMON NNE LAT I N NNE SIZE REMARKS V 5 BC BIRCH CLUMPS BEMA PENOULA 12-16' TALI { y C D P$ WHITE PINE PILAUS STROBDS 3-4' TALL ~ x Pn O CS REDOSIER DOGWOODS CORNUS SERICEA 3-4' TALL V 0 O 9Y LILAC SPRINSA VULGAR19 3-4' TALL Er ` Z O PS MIXED PERENNIALS - 3 GAL. 0 IOO PR PJM RHODODENDRON - 24-30' TALL D O PT PACHYSANDRA PACHYSANDRA 6:9'P E�NTS WAY 4 14 O VO CRANBERRY BUSH VIBURNUM OPULU9 3-4' TALL Q (y ki O FA FORSYTHIA - 3-4' TALL b" 105 EA BURNING BUSH EUOMMUS ALATA 19-24' TALL . a Z ; GENERAL NOTES: TA H L PLANT MATEINL R1B9TRUIOw MIST BE WAOIM BY CITY PLANSBI PRIORTO ANIgR TINT ; 2 AN P*V" BE WAROI ED FOR 1 AIL L YFROM DME OF COME" rw n a A �® BS�AiN( MO AM �i BE 70PSIXED. MOM AND S®® WRH LAM( M(11IE AS . 04 M ' * AL E MAIM SHOWN /M IB.ATNE TO WM SEA LeAL S. MX*IUH HEI%ff Of MWIfLTRES IN THE SPEM SIRffT VIEW COSIDOR - 2NL00' HEET NUMBEI s 32 100 p ` o u6u r - "- batter's box. Larkin drove the next pitch over the left -field fence for -econd homer. ■ Cardinals 5, Braves 4, 14 innings: At leading the wluwauxee brewers over -, -C Seattle Mariners. plays s at the San Jose Clash in `' Karl (1-0) allowed six hits, inrl' ,s the inaugural game of Major home runs by Ken Griffey Jr. and 3uhn- League Soccer, which will be er, and struck out a career -high elgnc. carried live by ESPN (8 p.m.). LEGAL NOTICES 1 CITY OF BURLINGTON, VERMONT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INVITATION TO BIDDERS /The City of Burlington re - .,quests that all contractors capable of providing the requested flower bed maintenance services, submit their Bid to Bur- lington Public Works -Traf- fic Division, by April 12, 1996, by 12:00 p.m. Bid documents outlining the `contract requirements can Abe obtained at the Bur- lington Public Works Of- fice located at 33 Kilburn Street, Mon -Fri, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. For further information please con- tact Gerald M. Paronto, Traffic Foreman at 863- 1,6351. 'April 4, 5, 6, 1996 INVITATION FOR BIDS School IN- -!_The Chittenden South f Supervisory District is seeking bid proposals for f•one 12 passesnger school bus, with hand- icapped lift. Bid specifica- tions may be obtained by writing to: Mark B. Bovier Business Managger RR #3, Box 161 Hinesburg, VT 05461 April 6 & 7, 1996 INVITATION TO BID Roofing Contractors are invited to submit bids on the following project: U-32 Jr. -Sr. High School RR #2, Box 3315 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 'The project consists of the removal of approxi- mately 7,000 sq.ft. of existing built up roofing and insulation over the English department area and corridor and the in- stallation of new materi- -bls. Call contact person at the site, Dave Vallee at 229- 9265, for an appointment or to receive written bid specifications. Sealed Bids will be opened at 2:00 PM on May 17, 1996, The School Board reserves the right 4d accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informalities in the bidding. r, f The awarding of a con- tract may be done by the School Board at its p cheduled meeting on May 28, 1996 at 7:00 PM. The Project must be com- pleted NO LATER THAN August 17, 1996. Continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES April 5, 6 & 7, 1996 INVITATION TO BID Special Services Trans- portation Agency, Inc. is offering for sale to the highest bidder for (4) Dodge maxi -vans in vary- ing conditions and with varying mileage. All vans have over 100,000 miles on them and are lift - equipped, with raised roots. Bids should be submitted to Murray Benner, Exec- utive Director, SSTA, 1504 Hegeman Ave., Col- chester, Vt. 05446 by April 15, 1966, All bids should indicate which van is being bid on by number. All vans are available for inspection at the SSTA offices by ap- pointment and are sold in an "as is" condition. SSTA reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Van numbers are as follows: # three (3) # five (5) # six (6) # nine (9) April 6, 7, 8, 1996 INVITATION TO BID FOR CHAMPLAIN VOCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. 77 HEGEMAN AVE. COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 EXTERIOR REPAIRS & PAINTING SEALED BIDS for the re- placement, repair and painting of fascia, soffits, double hung sash, roof clerestory monitors and repointing brick work. Specifications may be picked up April 15, 1996. Sealed bids accepted April 30, 1996. Estimated cost of project $22,000.00. On -site meet- ing April 19,1996. This project is funded in part by a grant from the Ver- mont Division for Historic Preservation. Call Skip Lucia at CVS (802)655- 0511. April 6, 7, 8 & 9, 1996 LEGAL NOTICE Chittenden County Regional Planning Com- mission shall hold a public hearing at the Town of Milton Offices, 43 Bom- bardier Road, Mitton, Ver- mont at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 24, 1996 for the purpose of receiving comment on the Town of Milton, Vermont Comprehensive Plan adopted April 5, 1993, and its consistency with the planning goals of Title 24 V.S.A., Section 4302 and compatibility with ap- proved plans and its re- gional plan, Chittenden Continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES 1 I LEGAL NOTICES y 1 I LEGAL NOTICES 1 1 LEGAL N( County Regional Plan, adopted November 12, 1991. The Commission shall also hold a public hearing at the Town Of- fices to receive comment, as part of the confirma- tion process, on Milton's planning process consis- tent with Title 24 V.S.A., Section 4350(a). CHITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION ARTHUR R. HOGAN, JR. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR April 6, 1996 NOTICE The Greensboro Nursing Home, Greensboro, Ver- mont 05841, is required by taw to give a reasona- ble amount of service at no cost or less than full cost to people who can- not pay. If you think that you are eligible for these services, please contact our business office at the Greensboro Nursing Home and ask for assis- tance. If you are not satis- fied with the results, you may contact the Vermont Department of Rehabilita- tion & Aging, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671. April 6 & 13, 1996 NOTICE TO CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS The Hartford School Dis- trict announces its inten- tion to commence a selection process of eligi- ble Construction Manage- rs for the renovation and addition to Hartford Mid- dle, High and Vocational Schools. Construction cost is estimated to be $5,600,000. All construction activity will be completed by the Fall of 1997 (anticipated). In accordance with Ver- mont Statute Chapter 9, Title 16, Section 559, the School Board is advertis- ing for interested Con- stsruction Managers to submit their qualifications for review. The School Board plans to review all qualifications and hopes to establish a shortlist of Construction Managers prior to Monday, Mayy 6, 1996. Shortlisted Con- struction Managers will be interviewed during the month of May. To be con- sidered as an eligible Construction Manager, firms must be capable of providing project bonding for the full contract amount and have experi- ence with school projects of a scope and complexity similar to the project be- ing planned. It is the in- tent of the School District Continued Next Column to select a Construction Manager based on the following criteria: 1. The experience and capabilities of the con- struction firm and its des- ignated staff. 2. Successful experience with three (3) public school or comparable projects, similar in scope of work and complexity to this project and with a construction cost of at least $5,000,000. At least one school project of this magnitude will have been completed within the last three (3) years. 3. History of project con- tract practices and com- pleting work on schedule. 4. Adequate bonding ca- pacity, including letter from bonding company. 5. Financial health of the construction company. 6. Adequate staffing and ability to provide their own forces for construc- tion and to perform the work within the project schedule. 7. Satisfaction of previous clients anad profession- als. Favorable references will be required from at least three (3) school su- perintendents, business managers, or school board members from completed projects, as well as three (3) architects from completed projects. 8. Evidence of exemplary performance in complet- ing the final 5 % of large scale projects. Construction Managers interested in being con- sidered for this project are asked to submit evi- dence of their qualifica- tions on AIA Document A305-Revised Contrac- tor's Qualification Statement to David Laurin at Banwell White Arnold Hemberger & Partners, Inc. (Architects), 6 South Park Street, Lebanon, NH 03766 by May 6, 1996. Copies of AIA Document A305-Revised can be ob- tained from Mr. Laurin at 603-448-3778. April 4, 5 & 6, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, April 23, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Revised final plat appli- cation of John Larkin to amend an approved planned residential devel- opment consisting of 120 Continued Next Column multi -family units and 37 single-family units, Bay Crest Road. The amend- ment consists of minor revisions to the layout of five (5) duplex buildings on 1.5 acres of land (i.e. "Cluster C"). 2) Revised final plat appli- cation of Sullivan and As- sociates to amend an approved planned unit de- velopment consisting of 48,000 square feet of of- fice, retail and personal service use and a 175 seat restaurant, Lake- wood Commons, Shel- burne Road. The amendment consists of converting 2,400 square feet of existing office space to day care use. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission April 6, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING WINOOSKI ZONING BOARD OF ADJUST- MENT A public hearing will be held in the Claire Burke Council Chambers, Wi- nooski City Hall, 27 West Allen St., on Thursday, April 25, 1996 at 6:30 p.m. to hear the following ap- plicant(s). #96-14: Paul Lemieux is appealing an administra- tive denial for a two car garage proposed to be located in the rear yard setback at 10 Niquette Court, and is requesting a variance for relief from the rear setback require- ment in the R-1-B district in accordance with the provisions of 24 V.S.A. $4468. All documents are avail- able for review at the Zoning Office of City Hall. Agenda available in alter- native media forms for people with disabilities. For disability access infor- matin call 655-6410, bul- lentin #77. Ray O'Connor Building/Zoning Administrator April 6, 1996 REQUEST FOR BIDS TOWN OF COLCHESTER, VERMONT CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL The Town of Colchester is accepting sealed bids from qualified individuals or companies to provide Animal Control Services for the Town. Additional information for bidders, Continued Next Column PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, April 23, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Revised final plat application of John Larkin to amend an approved planned residential development consisting of 120 multi- family units and 37 single-family units, Bay Crest Road. The amendment consists of minor revisions to the layout of five (5) duplex buildings on 1.5 acres of land (i.e., "Cluster C"). 2) Revised final plat application of Sullivan and Associates to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 48,000 square feet of office, retail and personal service use and a 175 seat restaurant, Lakewood Commons, Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of converting 2,400 square feet of existing office space to day care use. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission April 6, 1996 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant IUt-f h Wt 1k 2 ) Name of Subdivision FAO 1y t'�/ �kD(i Il M Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary application of plat Z7 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: ? ,-or-), 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and c,Qntaining all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. (Signature) applicant or contact person Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant J©HNt L-. V--k0 2) ,Name of Subdivision kalCy--rLE T-5 !�Oeayl,�,iD'i.' 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application 1Pib cr-J07A(:T 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: 511 Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a major s d'vision. (Signature) cant or contact person Date PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS ❑ APPLICATIONS Roadway, parking lot, building and pathway lighting. Any outdoor application where light light control to prevunt glare and light trespass is desired. L7 CONSTRUCTION Precision die-cast aluminum housing. One- piocc construction uliminales the threat of leaking. Finished in Duraplex II" bronze polyester powder for superior resistance against the elements. One-piece die-cast aluminum lens frame with integral hinges hold — -A _ 3"LtFor120Vt 6 .. Template 1-- 3" For 277V " - 6%- —�_ — Unit 11/16 • -8% EPA=.54 sq. It. 0 I � Series Mini Readway LurnWnafdir'r 35 watts thru 150 watts High Pressure Sodium Metal Halide fastened with captive stwne slu-ol haukl,, it Heat and shock resistant tempered gia: ; is sealed to turf:; Irunte via hLlUld :;iilConu I r: traffic, asserbly is suatcd to Iiousiiig via continuous nouprene, rubber gaskeling D,.., ,- porcelain socket ❑ OPTICS One-piece inlr:chc,n rfloldud lot consislr,nl performance. Hefloctor system precisely designed for IES Type III cutoff. Refer to Section 12 lot photum lric; data. v 'Maur; r K �NMCN�P�. -1 BAL.l. -,�J f,caaclorof riX HPF bal zIsi as non S,,clion 12 1,,1 eleCtrica data. I'I INSTALLATION east alun',ririnl rfiounlin(f afrn. SI'.. sur'faCO nuwra on a nu liiuum 4' , 1 LAW i. udf t nl:, l L n ULISe a:, t,pucified, ' �c:C11Gri 1:` h)f larrlp C;. L. ORDE,PWA G INFORI,WIATiu:.i lit Catalog No watts Lan q , ; t. ,; - : t;, x ballast HIGH PHESSUHE SODIUM RMS335NLXLU 35 07 4"!o'um I ?0 or 277 Reactor (ri: RMS350NLWD 50 E17 I✓it,ciu lfi 1 U or 217 Reactor (hi RMS370NLXLv 70 E l 7 W'xnum I 0 ur 277 Huaclor (Pi RMS310014LXLU, 100 E/13 i ,' W,::uiuf n I . U of 217 Hcaclor (I j RM531!)0NLXLU 1:0 L/lit; l,ucn I u of 277 Heactor (PJ METAL. HALIDE. AMS370PAAL 70 lilt: r:11iurn 10or277 H{HPIF RMS3100MAL 100 EDI ,iA;iufn I ) or 277 HX-HPF I LAMPS All unit; iiw supplied with a iiiedwni :;a �w;i fo order unil; without lafnp drop'L' Nii *Specify volt:(J OUnits supptiou with Ileacaor (NPF; ballast ha t 'I ki st eharq; N in Cat. No to "H", i.e.—. OPTIOWS To order factory options add appropriate suffix to Cat. No. FUSING: Fusing protucts HID circuitry it, pole mounted installations. It is suggestec that fuses are it with pole base tut accessibility and ease of maintenar ice. For 120V and 277V Single fusing ...... FS PHOTOCONTROL: (Button -Type) factory installed in housing back ......PCB ACCESSORIES The following are field installed accessories. Order by Cat. No. GLARE StliFLD: Architectural brc painted aluminum seotions may L,� i : ,a installed in patterns of two (at any i., :n ir3r) three side or four side configuratuul,s Four side assemblied provide 15" cut-off, 4 piece assembly ...................RS550 LEXAN VISOR: Clear, vandal-pro.ft polycarbonate shield protects agi, t r rocks, au -gun pellets, or other rni;;,'ilr,- To mount Glare Shield and Lexwi vr.or on the same fixture, consult factory ....RS552 CAST AE_UMINUM MOUNTING Pl. A 1 c: Finished in Duraplex II'" bronze polyc :.ter powder. Cast -in template mounts an:, to any si1:7 wcess box ............. .RSto CAST AHM ADAPTER: Attaches I,., ..:n for surface mounting on 3" round p0l,:5;. I ............. .. RS13 4" round poles ................... ..RS14 fi lock Item Normally :, iwo in factory stock and/or at local regio se �r ,A� DDivals sasnoi4aie,m jeuOlOW !cool Je JO /PUP )IJOIS Ajopej Uf Pafjje:) 8 WI/ I.v] 'lot IJIJUILSIDCxa jo 10) S. Ilk., U11 III UJIHI J+, PIC! 111 A I I 1 jbIOU UO3,;II-) i J01 Poddt,,� (101 (.)1 (Irl qjm UILIJ, LJO)j!IJUJ�:U1 cjULjjj,. I Ij 11 . C) Iuw jjfl�j SPL')I PWIN, wd bLj()I+L�jlq MOOLIE 'I!tlpu(:)) ,qcjjj;ju qn4 Z/ POCIdejpua j IjLj�jjt,) PO,f AjqwoS.,� ,,Ip Ou 'Uo(jqIujSU, U, UIJ PLA�C) t : UILP ,101 cL u0I130s, 01 nu PIju um"ID A OqI Luili,,Ibij Doti J.PAH uqulitj " I buc)li,, SOLL I( - I' ) Oull, L4bILJ Siop) DUI�qbij Imr -) f .1 IiI�s X Lw IA2 00. 00t 00l 001 001 00 t 00 t 011A! lSjj:w, XpIN Nai1vwb()I=jJyj W., , 'L., SO4S' JO adicj ,e 44firl , fiX, tit i Ha N CID pki r. x 'rwp\.1;Af: sue?• State of Vermont WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Case #: WW-4-0897 Environmental Protection Rules PIN #: EJ95-0076 Effective September 10, 1982 Applicant: John Larkin Address: 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 This project, consisting of constructing five duplexes with each duplex unit containing two bedrooms (a total of 20 bedrooms within the project) on the 1.53 acre lot referenced in Certification of Compliance 4CO526 for condominium cluster C located off Bay Crest Drive in the city of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4CO526. GENERAL 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission (phone 879-6563), the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106 or 658- 2199) and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project 95158, Sheet 1 "Site Plan" dated June 13, 1995 last revised September 1, 1995; Sheet 2 "Details" (for Construction Notes) dated June 13, 1995; Sheet 3 "Details" dated June 13, 1995 revised Sepstember 1, 1995; and Sheet 5 "Details" (for Water Service Detail) dated Aug. 25, 1995 prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 3. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for public buildings under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0897 Page 2 4. A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. 5. In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and be subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. 6. All conditions set forth in Certification of Compliance #4CO526 dated September 24, 1982 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. WATER SUPPLY 7. The project is approved for water supply by construction and utilization of the municipal water service depicted on the approved plans. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. 8. The installation of the water line extension shall be inspected by a professional engineer registered in the State of Vermont who shall report in writing, prior to occupancy, that the work has been completed in accordance with the approved plans. WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 9. The project is approved for connection to the South Burlington Bartlett Bay wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 3,000 gallons of sewage per day. No other method of wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. The municipal sewer collection system herein approved shall be routinely and reliably inspected during construction by a Vermont -registered professional engineer who shall, upon completion and prior to occupancy of the subject establishment, report in writing to the Wastewater Management Division that the installation was accomplished in accordance with the approved plans and permit conditions. Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0897 Page 3 11. The inspecting engineer's written construction report shall include the testing data and conclusions of all infiltration, leakage, and pressure testing performed on the components of the sewer collection system, in accordance with Appendix A of the Environmental Protection Rules. 12. The water service line shall always pass over the sewer lines with the invert of the water line at least 18 inches above the crown of the sewer pipe. The inspecting engineer for the water and/or sewer installation shall include, as part of their certification, compliance with this condition Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 25th day of October, 1995. William C. Brierley, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation B y-- Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Act 250 Coordinator -Louis Borie Water Supply Division Department of Labor and Industry Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. 10 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 September 27, 1995 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Harbor Heights Duplexes Bay Crest Drive So. Burlington, VT Dear Ray: We were able to record the mylar and easement deed for Harbor Heights on Monday, September 25, 1995 at 3:30 p.m., one hour before our 90 days would have expired. We all (Larkin Realty, Greg Rabideau Architect and Krebs & Lansing) would like to express our appreciation for your patience and the extra effort put into getting the documents recorded in time that the permits did not expire. Having gone through that once, we will be very anxious not to complete our "paperwork" at the 11th hour again. Without your assistance, it is obvious that we would not have made the deadline. A similar letter of recognition is being sent to Dan Lewbart of Stitzel & Page, P.C. Sincerely, - � Z A 4a William H. Nedde III WHN/sbh enclosure cc: Charles Hafter Joe Weith John Larkin Greg Rabideau Deb Sherman belair:wp#49 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES (ANR) AND ENVIRON ,ii-NTAL BOARD (ACT 2517 PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PE-MM1T TOTAL_ # DEC PERMITS 3 RESPONSE DATE -- ---- PENDING APPLICATION #_L,� L� �� C✓ & s DISTRICT 7 T OWN sd • �� /d/C�7'D�i% PIN # 95r - 00 '7 4 OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE NAME: J Orf1J i.A90A) NAME: ADDRESS: (/(0 SAtA0AAAC Ad. ADDRESS: Sv. �i�t�,yPiov t� pd�e3 TELEPHONE: �G y- 7 IVY TELEPHONE: Based on information provided by ISILt- A/EW,, 1) 4E• on �i�.� l�il� a project was reviewed on a tractttracts of land of 1 V-3 acres, located on 6,+Y CRACIT The project is generally described as: jRePes4FO iloomieue rtow vF S Au okcjeto &PJ A4Y V eJ r ✓k (14 4R OR 14t C97T) . R /Sewc2 � , er'lrnlsJ 4 l neu ?Fled As 0_4 UJr�,e e lhlCctUrCtAhC.. Wf}z�E )� Prior Permits From This Office: q 005.? e PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE x PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION t 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISD!CTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)). Commercial, residential or municipal project? Length of new/improved road(s) Has the landowner subdivided before? When/wheret# of lots AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED__:XYES NO; Copies sent to Statutory Parties: YES NO COMMENTS: L Cary °b f LEl '_ 1' � A w O'Jt' D67RUM #4. 6. & 9 SIGNATURE: S%___ _DATE: 9 Zln ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT): 111 VVM STREET (Assistai4) Distri.,_ Coordinator Telephone ESSEX JUNCTM. VT -'42 879—toS(P-11-) 2. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIViSION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED AYES NO L—Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Subdivision Wor Exemption — Deferral of Subdivision Tent[Travel Trailer Campground Mobile Home Park Se':rer Extension REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED AGENCY Of NATURAL RESOURCES DEPT. Of ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SIGNATURE: OATE:4�_FrADORESS: tit WEST STREET t— Environmental Assist rice Division ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452 Wastewater Management Division Telephone: (802) 879-6563 THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PERMITS YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION C�ASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Discharge Permit: pretreatment permits; industrial, municipal Indirect discharge permit_ Contact: Storrnwater permits %utLCj Sr[4ofJA4Ck' _ Residuals management sludge disposal (OVER) JTHER PERMITS YOU MAY NEED: (Contin( .I 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3840) Contact: Construction/modification of source Waste oil burning Furnace Boiler Conversion/installation Industrial Process Air Emissions WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) Underground injection control (Floor Drains) v Construction Permit, water system improvements 6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Hydroelectric Projects (241-3770) Shoreland encroachment (241-3777) Wetlands (241-3770) Stream Alteration (748-8787f786-5906) Open Burning Diesel Engines L 200 bHP) Contact: &_-il" - Well head protec on a4as Bottled Water Permit to operate New Source Contact: Use of chemicals in State waters(241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) Section 401 Water Quality Certificate, (241-3770) Water Withdrawal (241-3770) 7. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility certificate (241-3888) Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) Hazardous waste handler notification requirement (241-3888) Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444) Composting Facilities (241-3444) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) HW transporter certificate (241-3888) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR (802-241�-3737) Contact: Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) Municipal water/sewer 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Contact: Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) Stream Obstruction Approval 11. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office# Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, access Boilers and pressure vessels Storage of flammable liquids, explosives LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors Program for asbestos control & lead certification Children's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Child care facilities (241-2158) Nursing Homes (241-2345) Contact: Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) Junkyards (828-2049) Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) Railroad crossings (828-2760) Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) Construction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Signs, etc.) (828-2653) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Contact: Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) Milk processing facilities (828-2433) Animal shelters/kennels/livestock dealers (828-2421) Golf courses (828-2431) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Oleo/Class "C" Pesticides (828-243 ) 16. PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD (802-828-2358) Hydro projects Sells water to 1 or more persons 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3226) Historic buildings Archeological sites 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2366) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines) 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise tax/solid waste ��-22 OCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BLDG 10-18, CAMP JOHNSON, COLCHESTER, VT 05446 (655-0334) OTHER: REVISION DATE: 8'23?95 Y,e E� State of Vermont L AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council 111 West Street RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice Telephone # (802) 879-6563 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD September 25, 1995 John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Applicant: Subject: WW-4-0897 Construct 3000 gpd Vermont. ; Harbor Heights 5 duplexes total 20 bedrooms mun. water & sewer 1.34A located Bay Crest Drive in South Burlington, We received your completed application for the referenced permit on 09/15/95, including a fee of $1080 paid for by Check Number 7408. This application falls under the Water/Wastewater: Greater than 1000 GPD Program Area, and under the Performance Standards for this program area, we have 45 days of 'in-house' time for our review of your application. The information contained in your application has been forwarded to the Permit Specialist and an Act 250 District Coordinator. If not included with this letter, a Project Review Sheet will be sent under separate cover. A Project Review Sheet indicates other State agencies and departments you should constact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have questions relating to Act 250 jurisdiction, a District Coordinator may be reached at 879-6563 for Chittenden, Franklin, Grand Isle and Addison Counties. If you have questions relating to other department and agency jurisdictions, you can reach the Permit Specialist at this office. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 days in-house, please contact this office. S4cerely, /y \7�ene� L Roberge Administrative Secretary c: South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Krebs & Lansing Chlorine Free 100 % Recycled Paper Regional Office - Barre/Essex Jct-/Pittsford/N. Springfield/St Johnsbury Harbor Heights Condo Association 33 Harbor view Road South Burlington. VT -05403 October 29, 1997 City of South Burlington Planning Attention- Ray Belair RE: Breakaway Chain & No Thm Traffic sign Please be advised that as per your request, Harbor Heights Condo Association has removed the Breakaway chain and No Thru Traffic Sign that had been placed between Bay Court Condos and Harbor Heights condos for the safety of Harbor Heights residents. Harbor heights Condo Association President Nfark 'Waters L 'd gsEe 598 zoF ddoo S8tf1 �:jns I IVOXS WOd� HVSS : 6 L66 L -67,-0 L STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERN40NT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 OF COUNSEL PATTI R. PAGE' E-MAIL(FIRM2555@ AOL.COM) ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E.FLETCHER JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (-.ALSO ADMITTED IN N-Y-) September 23, 1997 Mr. Mark Waters, President Harbor Heights Condominium Association 33 Harbor View Road, Unit #1202 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: City of South Burlington Zoning Violation (Chain Across Driveway) Dear Mr. Waters: I am writing on behalf of the City of South Burlington. It has been brought to my attention by the planning and zoning assistant for the City that you have commenced land development on the Harbor Heights Condominium Association property without a permit in violation of the City of South Burlington Zoning Bylaws and 24 V.S.A. §4443 (a)(1). It is my understanding that this was brought to your attention by letter of Raymond J. Belair dated July 17, 1997 and by a Notice of Violation issued by Mr. Belair dated July 29, 1997 (copies attached). Further, I understand that you have not appealed the Notice of Violation to the Board of Adjustment and the time for taking an appeal has passed. I have been asked by City officials to contact you to discuss this matter and attempt to obtain your cooperation to comply with the City of South Burlington Zoning Bylaws. If such efforts fail, I have been asked to take such further action that is necessary and appropriate to obtain compliance with the City's Bylaws. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to arrange a time when we can discuss this matter. Ver trly fy�o seph S. u s, McLean JSM/dah Enclosures cc: ✓l�aymond J. Belair Charles Hafter SON3399.COR City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 29, 1997 Mark Waters, President Harbor Heights Condo Association 33 Harbor View Road, Unit #1202 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Violation, Chain Across Driveway Dear Mr. Waters: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 {l r 4 & F ETC:DER PC Please be advised that based on information available to the City, you have commenced land development on your property at the above address without obtaining a permit from the City as required by Section 27.10 of its Zoning Bylaws and 24 V.S.A. §4443(a)(1). Specifically, you have initiated the following activities on the above -described property: 1) Blocked access between the Harbor Heights condo development and the Bay Court condo development with a chain, and 2) erected two (2) "No Thru Street" signs. You have seven (7) days from the.date of this letter to discontinue this violation and take appropriate remedial action. Specifically, you must accomplish the following: 1) Remove all obstructions blocking vehicular access between the Harbor Heights condo development and the Bay Court condo development, and 2) remove all "No Thru Street" signs. If you do not accomplish the actions directed in this letter within seven (7) days of the date of this letter, the City may pursue this matter in court. In such court proceeding, the City will be entitled to seek appropriate injunctive relief and fines of up to $50.00 per day for each day your violation continues beyond the seven (7) day period provided in this letter. Mark Waters, President Zoning Violation July 29, 1997 Page 2 If the violation described in this letter occurs again within twelve (12) months of the date of this letter, you will not be entitled to receive a further Notice of Violation from the City before the City pursues further enforcement proceedings. You may appeal this Notice of Violation to the Board of Adjustment by filing a written notice of appeal within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter with the Clerk of the Board of Adjustment at the following address: 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT. 05403. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please call me at the telephone number setforth above. Zn eld J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RW/mcp Certified letter #P 280 219 112 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 July 17, 1997 Mark Waters, President Harbor Heights Condo Association 33 Harbor View Road, Unit #1202 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Violation, Chain Across Driveway Dear Mr. Waters: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 SEP 2 3 ►._,7 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER P t Please be advised that the Harbor Heights Condo Association is in violation of the planned unit development approval for your condominium development. Your violation consists of: 1) blocking access between your development and the Bay Court condo development, and 2) erecting a "No Thru Street" sign. This access can not be blocked without approval from the Planning Commission which you do not currently have. You have seven (7) days from receipt of this letter to remove the chains and sign or be subject to legal action. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sin rely, Al- lel2d J. Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 29, 1997 Mark Waters, President Harbor Heights Condo Association 33 Harbor View Road, Unit #1202 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Violation, Chain Across Driveway Dear Mr. Waters: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that based on information available to the City, you have commenced land development on your property at the above address without obtaining a permit from the City as required by Section 27.10 of its Zoning Bylaws and 24 V.S.A. §4443(a)(1). Specifically, you have initiated the following activities on the above -described property: 1) Blocked access between the Harbor Heights condo development and the Bay Court condo development with a chain, and 2) erected two (2) "No Thru Street" signs. You have seven ( 7 ) days from the .date of this letter to discontinue this violation and take appropriate remedial action. Specifically, you must accomplish the following: 1) Remove all obstructions blocking vehicular access between the Harbor Heights condo development and the Bay Court condo development, and 2) remove all "No Thru Street" signs. If you do not accomplish the actions directed in this letter within seven (7) days of the date of this letter, the City may pursue this matter in court. In such court proceeding, the City will be entitled to seek appropriate injunctive relief and fines of up to $50.00 per day for each day your violation continues beyond the seven (7) day period provided in this letter. Mark Waters, President Zoning Violation July 29, 1997 Page 2 If the violation described in this letter occurs again within twelve (12) months of the date of this letter, you will not be entitled to receive a further Notice of Violation from the City before the City pursues further enforcement proceedings. You may appeal this Notice of Violation to the Board of Adjustment by filing a written notice of appeal within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter with the Clerk of the Board of Adjustment at the following address: 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT. 05403. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please call me at the telephone number setforth above. Sinc ely, a dnd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RW/mcp Certified letter #P 280 219 112 fxbtlnp C.", Bmhe 'ITO .one. I I ?4B 7 Lot 46 I 7 V £x. catch Bosh I Rh" - 245.JB Inv: out - 2T9.1J m In 24( New /n v. 0 00 (New 4' /Doting oholn $evl4cs,) 246 &A,thg (Wdc 8-*. —� ra•.nw L Removes ex/st/ng curb,• t. prodde new cvrrb cv1 Lot 48 I I exht/ng curb cut ---� Ex. Serer Mord,de -� I Rl,n - 24525 Insert - 236,29 ?9 Exbthrg G At Bash, - - --- _ Ex Sewer Monho%� RL - 244. 98 1•rwwY = 2J556 I Lot 50 EMs(hy Lbtdr Irane/cvmw' w, a i M 13J sfer/y bonnet bolt cn hyd.,17,0 - 252.49 Zoning limit I � Spear 5 et Ridge I irew Prot tion Zone N/F City of South Burlington I 1i 2' ftr w Sewer Manhole 2_ 254 —..__ 1 I R' = 25015 fn to = 241. JC I inwv ouf = 241.:?0 \ New End Sxfkxr $ /Cmbac to exco., . \ with I'M* rack h wEnghee, to way N� Invert = 249.00 .Nwrolhvr/lowtkvr prig' M -dwe,9 N . r - --- - ` - - 25a 7 ` - - 8-- - - --- ti3- ---- 257---- --'---------- _ - _-__2 252---- Jy to, dwevs jo, b,,M g -tbxk 251x5 ` .r. 251.75 II t % / Nib„ I P E 4 t (I PHA 2 `� i '' ry N I Dupe i I Duple ,{2 $ i I I fhN A w.,ft tare e \ U i ; rw:.w.t ux a a52,t1 'may I I \ 4' cm \ 250x5 /' \ 2\72x5 buldin \ o \ > r) x �+ 251e9 252xO ll ` 49x9 j ,q 2514 251 \ 4w,.:. •Sig -St- xx- f .: 249.rW.3 �/✓_ 55 ai o mw { D�lwtr / eve. N N Nor Ak"IWO Y I I Rh7 246.010 / New 1 A7 h = 2J7.10 / See cA' I 1 In out = 2J7.00 l \ o ngeNtl MW \ f New bike rook / `\&.. ColtO Bash / w loll Rim = 7f4.. 15 / / 2 k7x5 t\ In> our - %m7.94 i 2aa----- — i� ��----- 24)--------------91&IW--_-'� A_GxQ _s�"1O'r" S 06MSS7' W - - — } r- � thg Co!N Bosh RMr/ONT Provide rlew• /b Cut i xl• 59;; �.D. �.. \ crwanovr u [n- r n* ; 2 wen ...Av 1 r 4 2\ I 4' PIT � i Ronk 24,tss —/ Bay Crest Road Mew 20' dahage Inv. out - M..70 4 ° In h (6 = 240.05 0, 20' 40' Bo' 120, « aowwetw Bar Scale 1' = 20• Cluster B to the ply of S 1. t� and desks on book Of a// unit$ where measured /n Me, field as built by Krebs Wd Lonsblg on 71 7197 Except Matt 1-8.. 2. Unit 1-8 dknw&c s where provide by Dab Shamon of Lankdr Realty 7/8/97 —Location Maw — n. Ls New 2,9' dolrloge eoserrent to the Clty of S Bud/ngtoa P/onning and Zoning Informotlon Owner and l /iH As: 410 Shelburne Rood Associates R EM C F I V LE: D South Burlington, Vt. 05401 JUL o 9 1997 Area: 66,369 sf - 1.524 acres Lot Coverage: City of So. Burlington Lot Area (1.524 acres) = 66,369 sf. Buildings = 12,24.5 sf, 84Ii/dfr79 COV&rage = 1 -1d 453 F /rich Park/ng, Roods, Sidewalks- = 12,361 sf. N / Total Coverage = 1224541 J61 =37.o8x mend Approx. Praoerty Lhe --W — W - Exsting Water L.he E lsting Sewer Llne -c— -_G. _— C.s,N g cos Line -- w --W -- Prea2Os.d Water Line Pnposed Sewer Line Exsting Electric CYyYWY'Y1Ed7e of Wald, IAX Suvey Cmtrol Point . 246�r— Exlet/ng Contour 1 i - New P4" Y1S I xfcfing 746.4Cofch8 Bosh 1 - - 2ag Pn} used Cartour token Out 240,77 200x0 Fhhh GYOde Spot E/erotion 248x1 •� - - - Aum \ 248 -"' ...................:. New footing drab seivice 1 1&V 1J1 -M- I M69terfy bmnet bolt on h}d.6t7J1 J Exstmg Catch Bosh J Efer = 248.80 R1m - 24502 (New Rhl 747.02) I AI, e, 1997 book Ned dset cod P.1-, .hn 7�/97 Mwvl h - 24t160 October 24 r996 b#" rock ad*. xe'Nr /U/20 New /nwvt Ln .. 240.60 (tank k CS A) ,ky 19, 1996 Roan' „-4 -J,,7 the xen 7'/�1D� bowl Out - 2+048 rdy 1, /996 ", 1• and 4 • n i .Robe 24, 199r, BMt 5 removed xax, 96 ApnV 79%'+ M.,ch Ig 1DA5 H�-1. t and d •�" J -96 se,lID, 26 ter wsrvkv4 DuWer /l ad /+ .tc" J-79-95 54otwnb« 16, 190 `wool',, loathe dra{'r .hn 9-27-95 I Soot-0e, 7, 7993 WadhS ee X a'aR'u, 614Yex W. 9--25-95 S4ctemba 7, 75 ner tMNt y wvt« W. D-70-5 e August 7D, lb1DS Ex edMfoy hhvrnof/an wtw $--)0-93 Oct. « I Design= RNN — Site Plan Oro- Orawn KET .!9 Lmsaanr av � ll �� v I Exlst47g Catch Bas1n 2 (to be reset) New bane and 9rote, Leda oo LK284 ' I Rlm = 246.03 (New Rbn = 24ZOO) New Mwvl h - 24202 (24' Mew hlwvt Art 24-1M (4 Insert out - 2,AJ6 (New Mw.rl out - 241.92) I New 20' dro/noga easement iI to the C'ty of S Budmgfal. w I Wow Catch Basin A Y I Fronde a•,d grate, Lo9oran W84 I a I Rhn - Il700 I /aged w, - 24t27 /nwwt out - 24117 > I Checked N Harbor Meadow I 2 Scale _1- _ 20' Dote Maw` igqq Condominiums pia Pro act _ 9515E Bo 0-0st SO Bu I "t YXLgS & L"SINC ConsultiiW ErWineers, Inc. JO Alain Shv,94 Go(clbeeterr, fe ont OS4V6 'K i 1 PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 November 19, 1997 John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Violation, Bay Crest Duplexes Dear Mr. Larkin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is to inform you that your recently constructed development, consisting of four (4) duplex buildings on Bay Crest Road, is in violation of its Planning Commission approval. It is in violation for the following reasons: 1) The chain/gate for the northerly access has never been installed. 2) The bike rack has never been installed. 3) Decks have been constructed on units A and B of building #4 without zoning permits. 4) A deck was constructed on unit B of building #3 without a zoning permit and this deck does not meet the 30 foot setback requirement. Please take appropriate steps to correct these violations as soon as possible. Failure to correct these violations may result in legal action. In addition, these violations may prevent the owners in the development from refinancing or selling their units as a John Larkin Zoning Violation November 19, 1997 Page 2 result of a recent Superior Court decision that zoning violations cloud the title. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc ely, K / Rad J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Kelli Stokes Harold & Joanne Soncrant Carolyn Lyman Jose & Kimberly Negron Joanne Winter Bonita Shaw West Andrew Button City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 13, 1997 Christie Mitchell Chittenden Bank 2 Burlington Square Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Negron Property, 26 Bay Crest Road Dear Ms. Mitchell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I have been asked to contact you regarding the status of the four (4) duplex units on Bay Crest Road built by John Larkin. This development is currently in violation of its approval for not installing a chain across one of the driveways and not installing a bike rack. John Larkin appeared before the Planning Commission on August 12, 1997 (minutes enclosed) for sketch plan review to discuss, among other things, the removal of the requirement for the chain and bike rack. As you can see from the minutes, the Commission was agreeable to eliminating the chain but not the bike rack. Approval to formally eliminate the chain has yet to be applied for and Mr. Larkin has six (6) months from the sketch plan meeting in which to make the application. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sin rely, 6j'� a nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 September 10, 1997 William Nedde III Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 10 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Add Decks, Cluster "C", Bay Crest Road Dear Mr. Nedde: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the August 12, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si cerel , v / Jo Weith, Cit Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Greg Rabideau 9 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 21, 1997 Mark Waters, President Harbor Heights Condo Association 33 Harbor View Road, Unit #1202 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Break Away Chain Dear Mr. Waters: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the June 24, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. rftly e Weith, C ty Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Andy Beam PLANNING COMMISSION 24 June 1997 page 4 6. Any change �to_the �site _plan _shall �require approval by the South Burlinjton�Planning�Commission. � Ms. Barone seconded. The motion_ was thenpassed 5. Sketch Plan Application of Mark Waters to amend a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 120 multi- family units and 37 single family units. The amendment consists of installing a break away chain across a private driveway con- necting Cluster A (Bay Court Condos) with Cluster B (Harbor Heights Condos), Harbor View & Bay Crest Road: Mr. Waters noted that the Bay Court people had put in speed bumps to slow traffic, and this has resulted in a majority of traffic now going through Harbor Heights at higher speeds than allowed. The residents of Harbor Heights would like a yellow chain secured to posts, similar to that at Pillsbury Manor. There would also be a barrel with reflective tape located in the middle of the chain. The Fire Department has given verbal approval. Mr. Weith noted that there are now 89 units, and there may be just a few more single family homes built. Mr. Waters said the homeowners association would maintain and plow the area of the chain which would be completely on Harbor Heights property. Mr. O'Rourke said he didn't want to be in the position of ar- bitrating a neighborhood dispute. He felt if the residents want to slow traffic, they should put in speed bumps. Mr. Waters said residents are afraid someone will get hurt. In the area where there are now speed bumps, people are still speeding between the bumps. Mr. Burgess said he was opposed to chains and didn't want to encourage this type of thing. A majority of members agreed. Mr. Teeson suggested putting in 2 stop signs as a start. Other members agreed that residents should try other measures before resorting to a chain. 6. Review changes made by the City Council to proposed amendments to the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The proposed amendments consist of adding two new land use categories (i.e., bus teerminals and transportation services) and granting broader approval authority to Planning/Zoning staff for minor site plan approvals. Mr. Weith said the following language will be added to the bus 17< E W&g C.tnh flm h,. I I J ster/y bonnW bat on hyd.11.13 Tlkv-N ..•-Zanino /irrTlt fllr� wawcw I I P48 I Lot 46' £x Catch Bask+ I Rhi - 245.: E --,I ink out = ZIAI.Y New hr. h ; 24L100 (N•, 4' foohq aPoih saMcv,) E &mg told, Sam. --I Removes OW18mg curt,• - prow4w new cvfb Cut I I exkrthq curb ant Ex. Sow Mmhde Lot 48 Rhl t 24225 Mwrt = 236.29 ki ExklArp LbfaS Bueh �\ I E:A Sewer Manhole Run - 244,9E Invert = 2TT.M Lot 50 E.dsrA,g GbraS ! bon.Rxrnaan aedul ® I 1 Spear St at Ridge Irew Prote tiorr Zone toX 10''0 rap N/F City of South Burlington 12 deep w Sewer Mmho/e 2 \ 254 !A.*= '-'2 ✓nh = 24L30 �•� ✓nro� out = 241.20 New End Spot/on 3 fcmbroo to .rcawts awt be \ #m tramp rook .Mw-1kn� WA., �Mb o aM p hwrt = 249.00 S 06;i3_57 W- -._ 253----_- --------- --250- - - --�--------�Z'ma-eTe�wd---'- -- - 252----- ? *Ons for detais ,m' setba w as,x5 MUM z5i x5 �I t II zsox., 1 t 2x5/T I pI I Pf E' 4 l PHA E 2 vI n Nul I Duple 7 lMk B-�— o 252., y I m I 1 \ ,257x5 4' cm • \ \ \ 2504 r \ boming / I c3y o1n /Cafe Ip" N / Ek catch Bash Run = 24I.95 l /rv, out =)237.70i ° I nV.v. h (e = 24aO5 0' 20' 'WI 80' 120' �— _.. SO,- Scale 1" = 20_ 25uo OeO x �� 257xg " 245ix7 el e 41 + /ry rr o_ �- N•w �S•w•r A/mhols Rkn t' 248.00 Now Ovate, J 1 /J? h = ?37.T0 / Sae h .�\ out = ?37.00 / to aroowN sYvaEv /hmt�F)7powet�oWr-- tw% - - - - -- - -- -New Me* rode / \\EA: C O Bash / M" _ 7(4.15 z 7r5 117 .94 .�,.`?_-----_---__---249-^_�� - - _ 247_------------_-iyE.`76',-__.. •- E6---. _-c----_ -- .S 06W57'W thg Ca Basin Remove exist Cun>• pra'ie. new c rd cut`2w' Bay Crest Road Now 20' c4ahoge to the Crty of .S 1 1�Po �d desks at bock of a4 units whwv m•asvred In the #Old as bupt by Krebs and LoneMg on 717197.. Except unit 1-B 2. 140 1-8 dknans/ms where prnwde by Deb-Zennan of Lmkh Realty 71"7. ` —Location Map — 1 -New 20' d oinoge easen;'ent to the City of S Buil/ngton. Planning and Zoniht Information 4 9}ras?r and 6aQ10EonG_ l I John P. Lorkin/L7H Associates 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vt. 05401' A�eo_ I 66,369 sf — 1.524 acres N / N N Lot Coverage: Lot Area (1.524 ocres) — 66,369 sf, 11 Buildngs 12245 sf. ! Building Cowvogs —18.450 / Parking, Roads, Sidewalks- _= 12,361 sf. N/,� /ris�h rota CoVerGge -L S 249x7 E elstng Catch Basin 2 (to be /vast) woo/ �x/ I L250- LK2Btgen d =adNh70)"'•24803 e= _ 24 New tn.wt In - 242.02 (?4) -- _. - Alb", Property Lh• _ New h7wrt In; 24.153 (4 Alb",Alb", -248-h. cI I h?mW out = 241.36 (New h7wrt out - 241.92) -- If -- W -- E,&Nhg Nbter the Y New 10' oYouloge eos•ment exbthq SO~ Lhe to the City of S Budngtm. Ex,,etkg Gas Luce --- w -- w -- phloosed "ter Line Phrosed Sewer Llne m e.xW k z4ex s.n .wxs. , I --E __- -- --- --E- £xlsthg Electric SW tn.tc n Irinwt IFran s a7d � La600rl 4K284 f-Y'Y-y-yY-Y-Y�Edpr of Woods -- - - - - Run = 247..010 -249 - - 'I p Ih7wi h - 24427 _I XX Sumey Control Poht \ ' I out = 241.1724 �- Exrstlly Cx>tour XAsthq Catch Bash 1 - 249 PAW-Od Contour Run = 246.4E 7 I /nver't out - 240.77 25aro F1'40 &nab •Spot E7awt/m 24e.i- = -{ - 248- e°"ee .......... I ........... New fwtiv oYaAf smite — I 7RV r31 -aF I N&SteNy bonnet bat on h}dpti-Tl Existing Catch Bosh 3 Ea. - 24880 Rlm - 245..02 (Now R/n, 247..02) I ,Airy $ 1997 bock }vrd d..•tr and p.ft... xl,n 718197 t Invert 17 - 24060 00obw 20, 7996 bee ruck tlV" .An mvx/pe i4tr/hq New Inww? h - 24060 (tank R CB A) '" 1$ l99e R..d nw„a z.hg /A,. .hn 7h9/9s /newt out - 24a48 Any$ lON NMt 1, and 4 'An Am. 2d 1996 Wt 5 removed .m = 7/2/9¢ m IVEDMNl .3 J99B Oep/ r .. xhn rch Zb; J9:i8 B.Ndhg J ontl 51�p/� whn .�-26-98 Marts !9, 79Fr6 tap amdaey drvA'rs� .and /e xhn 9--l7 Sgatwnber 2e', 7995 prodirp, loofhp dints xhn 9-27-95 - - -- -- - - - - - - - 54 I-bw 1, 1993 pr°J' tootklP OreM., d4'/ex xlrn 9--23-93 SW.lamb4 1, 75 new ewRaJ{ .Yrtef xlrn 9--1-93 August la, J993 t'7r. nmrt°Y hrerm.t/w xhn B--la-aT Data..Nsed \ UL o 9 1997 Design WW Site Plan &-fi m.r an pnd I Drown KEr/T.B bao.� ,n.r ar pw.td I Checked _ 'WN _ Scale = ?DHarbor Meadow City So. Burlington Date Muds 61r996 Condominiums Cluster B I Project 1817Y Crest Sa fiWA7 tan Ye_n Nii'h' I I g Q 6dSIN7 Com-rulaVrig ttyin JO d'aaa Stnet LolvAester, sernDnt O544e � PLANNING COMMISSION 10 September 1996 page 4 Mr. Weith said that Highland Terrace serves as a second access to 6 or 7 units which allowed the development to go to 57 units at that time. Mr. Hart said the Commission had approved 2 other developments with similar situation. Mr. Weith responded that the difference in those cases was that a median provided two separate access points. Mr. Dinklage moved to close the public hearing. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commissiion deny the Applicant's request to subdivide a 32.89 acre parcel of land into 42 lots (two open space lots and 40 single family lots), Dubois Drive. This application represents Phase III of the planned residential development known as Ledqeknoll. The reasons for denial are as follows: 1. The application does not comply with or satisfy the require- ments of Section 401.1(7) of the subdivision regulations. The proposal would add 40 dwelling units to a system of streets which share a common single access and which currently provide access to 52 dwelling units. This would result in a total of 92 dwellina units being served by a system of streets which share a common single access. 2. The application does not comply with or satisfv the reauire- ments of Section 26.151(f) of the zoning regulations and Section 417(f) of the subdivision regulations. The failure to provide at least two points of access to serve 92 dwelling units could cause an unreasonable burden on the Citv to provide adequate emergency service. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The Chair declared the appication to be denied. 5. Public Hearing; Revised final plat application of John Larkin, Inc., to amend a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 120 multi -family units and 37 single family units. The amendment consists of 1) adding one additional single family dwelling lot on Keari Lane, and 2) reducing the number of multi -family units in "Cluster C" on Bay Crest Roaad by 2 units: Mr. Rabideau showed the location of the proposed home. The applicant is asking to allow the 30 ft. perimeter setback to continue for this lot. They have staked it out and feel a very nice home could be built there. It is adjacent to the park land. The applicant agreed to a notice of condition regarding the CO Zone. PLANNING COMMISSION 10 September 1996 page 5 Mr. Larkin said he is considering purchasing some land from the city and exchanging with another piece of land he owns somewhere else so this home isn't such a tight fit. Mr. Beaudin felt there could be a very decent house there. Mr. Collins, a neighbor of the proposed home, said he supports it and feels it gives a good aesthetic feeling. Mr. Teeson moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of John -Larkin, Inc, to amend a previous- ly approved planned residential development consisting of 120 multi -family units and 37 single family units. The amendment consists of: 1) adding one additional single family dwelling lot on Ke -i Lane and 2) reducing the number of multi -family units in "Cluster C" on Bay Crest Road by two units, as depicted on a three page set of plans, page one entitled "Site Plan, Harbor Meadow Condominiums, Bay Crest, South Burlington, Vermont," pre- pared by Krebs & Lansina Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated March 5, 1996, last revised July 2, 1996, with the following stipula- tions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Pursuant to Section 8.404 of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission waives the PRD perimeter setback for the pro- posed single family lot on Keari Lane. 3. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant shall submit for approval by the City Attorney and record in the land records a "Notice of Conditions" which": 1) requires the buyers of the property to be shown a copy of the approved plan, and 2) which notes the C.O. District restrictions. 4. The plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording: a) A survey plat shall be submitted for the Keari Lane lot which identifies the specific building envelope location the lot, stream centerlines, and C.O. District boundaries. b) The planting schedule on the landscaping plan for the Harbor Meadow Condos shall be revised to reflect the reduc- tion in plantings. c. The boundaries of the Spear Street -Ridge View Protectiion Zone shall be shown on the site plan for the Bay Crest Road PLANNING COMMISSION 10 September 1996 page 6 property. d) The site plan and landscaping plan for the Bay Crest Road property shall be revised to note the correct name of Bay Crest Road. 5. Any change to the plan shall require approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission. 6. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planninq Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Mr. Dinklage seconded. The motion was then passed unanimously. 6. Site plan application of Brad Rabinowitz to construct an 11,250 sq. ft. warehouse on a 1.42 acre parcel, 45 Commerce Avenue: The applicant showed the location in the Ethan Allen Farms sub- division. It is currently open land. There would be 44� lot coverage. All setbacks are met. There is a wetland that crosses a corner of the lot. The development would be well back from it. There are 2 power line easements on the property where nothing can be built. Mr. Rabinowitz questioned the amount of landscaping required. Mr. Burgess said there is no provision to waive it and suggested working with Mr. Weith to get the best landscaping plan for the lot. Mr. Dinklage asked about a sidewalk. Mr. Weith said the city could accept a contribution to the sidewalk fund for this sub- division. No other issues were raised. Ms. Barone moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Brad Rabinowitz to construct an 11,250 sq. ft. warehouse on a 1.42 acre parcel, 45 Commerce Avenue, as depicted on a two page set of plans, page one entitled "North Country Mechanical Insulators, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Brad Rabinowitz, Architect, dated 8/15/96, with the following stipulations• 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- . F • KREBS & �a.ANSING CONSULTINu ENGINEERS, INC. Ik ® 199 MAIN STREET, WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404 655.3640 TRAFFIC REPORT BARTLETT PROPERTY US Route 7 South Burlington, Vermont Attachment 11 A-33 Civil and Sanitary Engineering Surveying Land Development and Subdivisions I. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to quantify the potential impact which the proposed development may have on the quality of traffic flow on Route 7 in South Burlington, and to identify any future improvements which may be needed to ensure an acceptable quality of traffic flow. This information should be useful to both state and local officials during their review of this proposed development. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed development will be located in the city of South Burlington, Vermont. An access point is proposed on the east side of Route 7, between Allen Road. and the intersection of Route? and Green Mountain Drive and Bartlett Bay Road. There will also be two access points to the Meadowood at Spear development, which in turn leads onto Spear Street. (Refer to the Location Plan.) This development will contain both commercial and resi- dential land use areas. The residential area will consist of 37 single-family dwelling units and 120 multiple -family dwell- ing units. The commercial area is estimated to contain a total of 144,000 square feet of gross floor space. For the purpose of estimating traffic, it was projected that this commercial area would have the following composition: 25o - General Office Building 40% - Retail and Specialty Sales 5% - New Car Sales 30% - Warehouse (storage) The development, both residential and commercial, would occur over a period of five years. Thus, the project Vould be completed in the year 1987. III. FINDINGS Estimated Traffic Volumes The completion of this project will generate new traffic on nearby roads, since some vehicles will be destined for the development and others will be originating from it. It is this newly -generated traffic that will affect the quality of traffic on Route 7. Therefore, reasonable estimates of the traffic which may be generated by the commercial/residential development were made. These estimates were based on the type of land use A-33a outlined above and on the average trip generation rates, published by the Institute of Transportaion Engineers. The following Table summarizes the AM and PM peak hour estimates of entering and exiting traffic for the proposed development. Table 1. Trip Generation During Peak Hours of Adjacent Street Traffic AM PM Enter Exit Enter Exit Residential 25 80 75 40 Commercial 250 70 215 285 The 1987 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Shelburne Road (in the vicinity of this project) was computed using infor- mation supplied by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. This ADT reflects the condition where no development elists. With- out the proposed development the 1987 ADT on Shelburne Road was calculated to be 21,800 vehicles per day. This 1987 ADT also reflects the condition of NO Southern Connector. If the Southern Connector (South Burlingon portion) is completed by the projected year 1987 or 1988, then, according to the Vi?rmont Agency of Transportation, the ADT on Shelburne will be around 8,000 vehicles per day. For the purpose of this review it was assumed that the Southern Connector would not be complete when this property is fully developed. How- ever, the realistic possibility that the Connector may be complete in 1987 or shortly thereafter should be kept in mind while reading this report. The Design Hour Volume (DMV), which is defined as the 30th highest hour of the year, was calculated for Shelburne Road. This DHV computation was based on information provided by the Vermont Agency of Transportation and was computed as 1545 vehicles per hour. Capacity Analysis An analysis was conducted of the overall operating Levels of Service for the Design Hour at the three intersections (Route 7 and Green Mountain Drive, Route 7 and the proposed access point, and Route 7 and Allen Road). This analysis was performed for two cases: 1) With the proposed development and 2) Without the proposed development. The results of this analysis at the intersection of Route 7 and the proposed access point indicate that a traffic signal N A-33b will be needed to create sufficient gaps in the traffic stream so that vehicles may enter and exit the project site within a reasonable time. In addition to the traffic signal, there will have to be an exclusive left turn lane on Shelburne Road for vehicles approaching from the north and an exclusive left turn lane for vehicles exiting the proposed development. Shelburne Road, at its present width, is wide enough to accommodate the lane change. The proposed pavement marking changes and signal phasing are shown in Figure 1. With these changes this inter- section will operate at Level of Service C. The following table summarizes the results of the inter- section capacity analysis at Route 7 and Green Mountain Drive and Route 7 and Allen Road& Table 2. 1987 Level of Service Without With Signalized Intersection Dev. Dev. Route 7 & Green Mtn. Dr. D D Unsignalized Intersection Route 7 & Allen Road Left turn from Shelburne Rd. A A Left & Right turns from Allen Rd. E* E* * Total Turning Volume of 90 Vehicles per Hour IV. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis of traffic operations at the intersections of Route 7 and Green Mountain Drive, and Route 7 and Allen Road, it is evident that the proposed project will not alter the quality of traffic flow on Shelburne Road or the intersecting roadways. The above table demonstrates that the operating Level of Service with and without development traffic remains the same. With the mentioned improvements to the intersection of the proposed access point and Shelburne Road , traffic will flow through at an acceptable Level of Service. Therefore, there will not be any adverse impact on the quality of traffic flow at this intersection either. The signal at the intersection will not be needed until the commercial portion of this property is developed, and then only temporarily until the Southern Connector is completed. Once the Connector is complete this signal should be removed. If, by chance, the Connector is completed before the commercial development, there will be no need for this signal. The actual need should be re-evaluated at the time commercial development is completed. 3 A-33c ri FIGURE 1 ?WOSED IMPROVEMENTS D v] �--:I 0 41 b,3 .,4 as T> 12' r J 1KL1 CL1 t 11dJ C.7 X_ C cn V W L-� ti— C � IL 9 C rtlett Property A-33d - --, (— -- STAi TDN D Z- - --__ _. _-_ .._. _ _ ____ _ -- VEDMONT 'AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION - - MONTH AUGUST f ,I ROUTE US 7 CONTINUT,US TRAFFIL CIAINT YcAP I981 TI1Mt1 S/1ELBURNE • ► • HOURLY LISTING • • • 01AE.CIION HOT,i C) DAY 12 Ol 02 03 04 05 06 ' 07 08 09 10 1.1 12 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 1 OFAM-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- PM'- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- DAILY - MSG OI-off-03 - a.��4'�J�o7—aA__a4-_io _ rT-iZ-_ o1—or-63—o4 Os_ 06 01 ---06- 09-_ -10 11 12 TOTAL ! 0 1S 252 141 76 40 39 77 193. 402 624 900 1079 1039 1011 1010 921 923 972 894 757 741 697 590 427 394 14199 ILI_ _ 2S 246 165 61 3T 27 31 108 234 425 661 829 % 2 932 410 866 891 918 962 652 752 722 537 366 223 12751 3M 122 48 27 39 110 483 953 811 915 931 946 1014 999 995 1139 12R9 1225 748 620 500 434 2R2 202 14878___ - 4T 108 -4A -34�9 _46 47 117 472 942 853 All 971 990 954 981 1045 1132 1183 1149 827 693 604 482 123 230 1524S (_ 5W 142 S1 36 39 31 109 414 851 793 859 407 990 1012 979 1027 1177 1322 1254 775 680 410 465 321 218 141142 6T 134 44 43__ 36 104 430 875 916 915 1003 991 1086.1082 1039.1218 1411 1313 P67 731 387 300 16162 I 7F 14d 79 58 43 _57 57 105 45L 830 866 964 995 1011 1097 1064 1052 1252 1324 1411 1001 _616 877 687 _536 572 508 358 1685U O - 1„ 85 251 95 75 40 41 68 156 345 551 865 1140 1316 1132.1165 1063 1035 1124 1005 B74 666 614 492 421 359 14895 9S 221 V46 72 36 2T 40 165 223 446 629 R29 1601 494 1076 434 934 10116 1053 76► 726 Soo 462 370 242 13066 I 0 g 10m 113 61 50 31 48 115 71 907 864 931 971 1011 982 920 I0J8 1098 1211 1253 ?103 707 606 48l 304 206 15212 I1T 132 42 32 3B 38 100 58 926 889 A96 IQ19 4�?1 991 982 1034 1195 1231 1253 8S3 65ii 505 451 347 241 15265 C, 12W 124 71 34 42 52 103 439 871 904 954 1373 950 /964.1029 975 1185 1383 1251t d66 759 616 573 355 230 15801 J • 13T 146 62 43 40 48 97 450 895 41S 87R 1004 983 96 1054 1052 1169 1299 L371 A92 705_ 594 494 401 300 15494 - 14F 174 78 49 - 41` 45 111 436 923 A61 IOOI 1098 1036 1095 990 1059 1191 1469 14J5 1U26 931 759 610 436 369 M OR I - 231 127 123 51 75 172 345 579 824 1101 1262 1291 1190 1066 1069 1065 989 767 659 583 433 346 350 14747 - 16S 18l 150. 80_ 49 _49 27 45 93 232 365 S41 789 899 958 960 995 990 91U 919 014 614 616 480 337 256 12491 „ 17M 127 51 38 53 40 113 439 854 796 841 1029 1142 1054 l_046 1073 1170 1306 1219 787 611 494 431. 114 226 15254 _ - iRT 143 '-61 -N 61i 47 103 452 417 855 896 977 907 1007 935 983 1153 1418 1286 648 774 543 479 319 767 15403 low 139 12 41 44 41 91 454 913 89A 927 077 1016 1000 994 1076 1169 13d2 1212 799 76l 612 521 151 263 ISR13 20T 152 62 59 32 49 122 476 939.936 961 1026 10,17 1028 969 1051 1161 1114 1200 776 706 661__499 345 244 15775 »C� 21E 140 64 37 41 44 101 456 866 920 912 1012 1023 1061 1091 1107 1277 1415 13S1 1003 646 745 608 433 162 16959 � 9 R O j„ 27S 255 121 93 54 61 73 199 374 629 R62 1087 1199 1100 TORS 1125 996 1080 854 645 526 364 340 14858 W 21S 219 139 310 '-46�24 -56 101 228 448 672 424 ION? 979 1067 _991 991 1023 964 979 950 __743. 752 647 504 330 7.10 13321 D. O !„ 244 ION 51 39 59 38 105 428 925 861 833 959 1002 1024 1013 104v 1149 1269 12o3 819 612 460 _397 276 194 14028 ._ 25T 115 61 31 41 _45 107 445 904 1497 880 955 930 1033 1014 980 L1RO 1110 1235 A14 671 510 449 340 225 1Sty2 C 26W 101 55 47 40 45 90 426 918 914 902 984 998 951 994 955 1109 1375 1259 814 677 519 428 333 232 15166 „ 27T 127 58 39 41 47 90 460 Bob 931 878 1015 1019 1048 1181 1364 1264_ 869. 702__567 _ 468 367 72l 15732 2AF 161 42 53 4I 7.0-101 402 882 865 844 945 _976.1067 975 1052 1018 1622 1228 1374 1362 1014 788 697 556 369 a14 1b191 •„ 29S 21i L19 88 64 84 138 551 l_041 1130 1142 1099 1107 1014 963 755 641 554 443 190 323 14111 - __ 30S 226 _ 116 __ 63 27 __51 28 _ 34 _339__ A3 163 351 __770 554 741 R60 985 _l_J32 967 936 947 1018 938 761 749 512 438 297 182 12026 ; O I „ 0 31m 103 -60 43 41 45 95 462 --- 939 -- 902 906 946 913 993 952 --- 947 ---- 1060 -- - 1267 1214- - - 820 ------ 638 469. - . __... 390_ _303. 20S 14730 - AVERAGES - u A-F 131 59 41 42 45 104 448 901 874 904 908 989 1022 1006 1029 1173 1342 1_277 _AS9 722__S83 492 354 257 15647 „ - —S=S-231- 192--a1--45-37-'58 -135 --289- -497 -728 --Q�T-1-0T4 1052 1046 98b L009 1025 964 805 710 619 491 365 288 13647 , DOM 161 83 54 43 43 89 347 704 75S 847 979 1016 1032 1018 1015 1120 1240 I181 842 7L8 594 491 358 267 ►5002 ,�_• - 40—MISTED AVE R4GE-AEEKiSAY--T5b80 11TGRT 9 CONSECUT VOLUNF 9350 AVERAGE SATURDAY - 14562 HIGH HOUR 4- 5 PM DAY FRI DATE 14 VOLUME 1469 , AVFRAGE SUNDAY - 12732 HIGH DAY DAY FRI DATE 14 _VOLUME 17208_�. „ DJUSTED AVER�C AY Z5100 _ - RATIO _ AOJ. AVG. DAV % ADJ. AVG. WEEKDAY = 0.963 , r*N PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 13, 1982 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, July 13, 1982 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; Peter Jacob, George Mona, James Ewing, Kirk Woolery Members Absent Ernest Levesque, Robert Walsh Others Present David Spitz, Planner; John Larkin, Robert Krebs, Howard Perkett, Stephen Page, Doug Fitzpatrick, Dan O'Brien, Russ Launderville, Lowell Krasener, Jodie Peck, Free Press; Judy Hurd, The Other Paper Minutes of June 22, 1982 The June 22, 1982 minutes were approved on a motion by Mr. Mona, a second by Mr. Jacob and a unanimous vote. Continuation of public hearing on final plat application by LTH Associate. for development of 40 residential acres and 30 commercial acres on property owned by Bartlett on Shelburne Road. Project contains 120 units of multi- t family housing and 37 individual house lots Mr. Spitz said this was warned incorrectly on June 8 and that it had been properly warned this time, and letters sent to neighbors. Mr. Perkett said he was a neighbor and had not been notified, but he did not know if others had been. Mr. Spitz said more legal information was needed, but that was the city's delay, not the applicant's. Mr. Krebs, representing LTH, said that Bayview would be the name of the main road. He will submit other names to the Planner for approval. Mr. Krebs said the road grade was 31 for 60' coming off route 7. The City engineer has agreed to that because when the Southern Connector goes in, it will probably impact this access road. Mr. Krebs said he did not want to make a deep cut for this road, so when the Connector comes in, they will not be out of reach of it. He did not think the State had finalized the design of what the Connector would look like in this area. Mr. Ewing noted that the grade of Shelburne Road might be changed for the Connector. Mr. Krebs said that, as far as drainage, the main increase would be in the multi -family area, where they would use filters and retention ponds to attenuate the peak flows. There will be 4 ponds and Mr. Krebs said they would design them so they did not have berms, but were scooped -out areas. They will be well landscaped, he said. It was suggested that they be designed so they could be mowed. Mr. Krebs said the ponds would insure that water from this development would be released so that it would not increase in speed or volume. Pis. Ewing noted that each commercial lot would probably have to have its own pond. The erosion problem behind Shearer Chevrolet was discussed. Mr. Spitz said he could not justify having this developer fix that. He and the City Engineer/ Manager did not feel this would worsen the situation, since only part of this drainage will go by that area. Mr. Mona felt the City Engineer should consider that area on the basis of what should be done, purely from an engineering point 2. PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 13, 1982 of view. He felt the Commission should wait to hear that information. The other Commission members felt they should proceed with the application, although Mr. Poger asked for a report from the Engineer on the situation, and Mr. Jacob suggested that members take a look at it. Mr. Mona wondered about separating the area shown as "neighborhood park" on the plat from the open space behind clusters 4,5 and 6, but was told a 30- 40' ravine did that already, and there were also portions of a fence there. Mr. Perkett suggested that there be a stipulation regarding the limitation of 50 units on a single access, and noting that that is not*5Ain addition to whatever is in place already. He also requested that the Commission not require a connection to Quail Run, since he felt that would not serve the purpose it was intended to. Mr. Mona noted that if Mr. Larkin wished, he could develop 9 units off the Meadowood at Spear access and 50 off the Shelburne Road access. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application by LTH Associates for development of 40 residential and 30 commercial acres fronting on Shelburne Road as depicted on a 23-page plan set entitled "Bartlett Property, Residential, Commercial Subdivision, LTH Associates," prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, with revisions through Julv 6. 1982. subject to the following stipulations: 1. All street names shall be approved by the City Planner and shall be indicated on the final plat. 2. If there is a single public access from Shelburne Road, the applicant may develop up to 50 residential units or 15 commercial acres, or some appropriate combination as determined by the City Planner. If there is a single access at Meadowood at Spear, the limit is 9 residential units. 3. The Pheasant Way street connection shall be made before the Quail Run connection. 4. The need for sidewalks on the south side of the commercial road shall be reviewed, and required if needed, at the time of application for development of individual lots. 5. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Water. Superintendent Robert Gardner's letter dated June 4, 1982. 6. Deeds for lots 11 through 19 shall contain wording indicating that additional precautions may be needed at the time of building construction to assure proper storm drainage. The wording shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney. 7. The 10' z 10' triangle on all corner lots shall also be indicated on all plan profile sheets. 8. An estimate of total building cost shall be submitted to verify whether proposed landscaping meets the requirements of the ordinance. If any additional landscaping is required, a revised plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner. 9. Bonding to cover the cost of all required landscaping, streets. sidewalks utilities and other public improvements shall be submitted rior to issuance of a building permit. Bonding shall also include an amount or 3. PLANNING COMMISSION JULY_ 13, 1982 site restoration of all areas disturbed during construction. 10. Revised legal documents, containing; required changes from Attorney Richard apokes' letter dated July 13, 1982 shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney prior to recording of the final plat. 11. A revised final plat, containing required changes from stipulations 11 7, and 8 shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a building permit. 12. Page 2 of the final plat shall be recorded, at a size and scale that satisfies City and State recording requirements, within 90 days. 13. This approval expires in 4 years. 14. Note ##2 on page 2 of the plan of record shall be removed. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. The motion as originally made contained a stipulation #8 as follows "Lots 34, 35 and 36 are approved as duplex lots". Mr. Mona said he did not recall any duplex lots, but was told they had been shown from the beginning. He did not like them, feeling this was not the location for them, and he moved to remove stipulation #8. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion. Mr. Krebs said that at sketch plan, they had shown 40 single family lots, and in a discussion with the Recreation Director, who had wanted some park land, they had compromised with more park land and the duplex lots. Mr. f Larkin added that these lots had been planned a long time ago and if he had known they would be a problem, he would have changed something else. Fir. Mona's motion carried with Messrs. Jacob and Woolery voting no. Mr. Mona then moved to add a stipulation to remove note #2 on page 2 of the plan of record, and Mr. Ewing seconded this. It carried with Messrs. Jacob and Woolery voting no. Mr. Mona informed Mr. Larkin that if the courts do not declare the Meadowood at Spear streets to be public, his development could not use them as access from the east. Mr. Spitz said the city did not want to be involved with any private access areas, even if Mr. Larkin could obtain the right to use them. The motion carried with Mr. Mona voting no. He stated that he had wanted information on the erosion situation near Shearer before approving the project. Sketch plan application by O'Brien Brothers, Inc. for a 36-unit modular home planned development on Patchen Road west of I-89 Mr. Ewing felt he might have a conflict of interest in this case because of a similar proposal he had in another town, and he wanted to remove himself from the discussion, which he did. Mr. Page, representing the O'Brien brothers, said modular homes were pre -fabricated before they are put on the site. Mr. Mona asked if these homes could be moved from the site and was told it would take a lot of effort. Mr. Page said the site contained about 31 acres, but it contains irregular and steeply sloping terrain. The project will use 8-10 acres for the homes. There is an existing single-family home on the land already, in which are some tenants. The O'Briens will own the land and lease it to the owners of the units. The site will have city water and sewer. The land is zoned R4, so allowed density could be as high as 120 units, but only part of the land is i PLANNIiuG CODIMISSION JANUARY 26, 1982 unregistered vehicles on the property. All vehicles awaiting repair shall be parked within the designated parking area, in the rear of the building. No trailer storage shall be allowed on the lot. 4. Shared use of the proposed driveway for this building shall be considered during any future subdivision or development application on this property. 5• A septic system design shall be submitted to and aproved by the Zoning Administrator prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. A revised site plan, containing required information from stipulation 1, shall be submitted to and api;roved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. This ap;,roval expires in 6 months. e1r. 'Ewing seconded the inotion, and it carried with Mr. Mona voting no. He stated that he was not satisfied with the screening. He felt that 5' trees would take a long time to grow to where they would be effective. Continuation of-,reliminary plat a olicetion b LTH Associates Yor deve c ment of 30 commercial acres and 40 residential are rig, of 120 multi -family units and 38 house lots on ;roj;erty owned by Bartlett on :,helourne Load Mr. Opitz said he had submitted a letter from the State Agency of Transportation regarding the Southern Connector and this development and he has also talked to the Irish family. To date, there has been no decision in the ;eadowood at O"pear court case regarding the public/private streets. Mr. Krebs felt a better solution to access to Shelburne Road could be found than that proposed by the State. He noted that Mr. Spitz had an area blocked out on the plan sent by the State. He proposed that that whole area be blocked off and everyone forced to use the Connector. Where the access crosses route 7 should be a 900 angle, he said. Nr. Krebs said he had met with the fire chief to discuss the plan. They will put in a second access across one of the gullies on the land to connect two areas. Some access poii,ts have been eliminated in other areas. In regard t�',tSegt 900 turns, Mr. Krebs pointed out a couple of areas in the city wherettiiose worked all right. lie also felt that the turns would be good places to put stop signs and/or traffic lights later, if it was felt they were needed. Dir. Krebs said this drainage would go into the culvert which is to be upgraded by Mr. ;-blot in his proposed development on the South Beach land. D:r. Poger said this issue would be investigated further at final plat. Mr. Spitz said he did not consider this plan to be finished enough to be approvable tonight. lie did not like the 900 turns, feeling it would not be clear, unless it were well marked, which way traffic was to go. He said he felt there were areas on the plan which could be improved. He also asked where, if the road does not go all the way through, it is going to terminate? He showed three possible road layouts, based on different assumptions about access through the Ireland and Irish areas. Mr. Ewing said he personally would like to see a connection to Pheasant Way. Mr. Poger did not want to encourage commercial traffic to go through Meadowood. Mr. P1.ANINING COMMISSION 6. JAIMARY 26, 1962 Ewing said that if that became a proble%,i, part of the road could be removed, and ::r. Krebs said that that was way they did not want to change the plan. They feel that the way it is proposed gives the most flexibility to the city to change it. ;:r. Spitz said that if the public street were closed off, a turnaround would have to be provided. .:r. Xona noted that no more than 50 units could be built if access were available only to Shelburne Road. The developer is therefore asking for approval predicated on the roads in 11,11eadowood at Spear being declared public. Zr. :Iona felt that if the courts ruled against the city on this issue, the application would be null and void. i'r. Woolery asked how the School Board, fire chief and other city officivls felt about the road being a through road. c:obert Kieran and Howard Perkett, residents of Meadowood, questioned why there had to be two connections to that development rather than one. They felt the quail Run access would increase traffic for many more residents of Meadowood than just the Pheasant Way access would. Mr. Ewing felt the ,�eeond access was desired by the fire chief. Mr. Irish stated that he and his family did not intend to develop the land they own in this area. He stated that there were 9 in the family, the youngest being 30, and none of them wanted it developed. In addition, most of them have children, and none of them want to develop it, so he felt it would remain undeveloped for many years. Mr. Po,;er noted that the Commission would have to assume that there will be connections to dual Run and Pheasant Way as public streets. If the court rules against the city, he felt the approval would lapse because the conditions on which it was based would not exist any longer, and the developers would have to come back to the city. If the developer wants to start construction before the courts have made a decision, tie will have to show a plan for only 50 units. It was noted that even if the courts ruled against the developer of ;Seadowood at Spear, and made the streets public, he could still file an appeal and the issue would not be settled. Mr. Levesque said he would base his vote on the fact that the streets in :leadowood were voted public after a trial period of being private. Mr. Ewing noted that they were not public until they were offered to and accepted by the city. A resident of Meadowood asked whether the Commission considered the two access points to Neadowood, which itself has only one access to Spear :street, one access or two. It was decided that it was one access. :r. ?Ilona asked if Chairman roger had ruled that the Commission was reviewing, this application on the assumption of a favorable ruling on the streets in ',•:eadowood and was told he had. �:r. Smith noted that if the road between the commercial and residential areas of the proposed development were broken, that would leave only one access for the residential area, and :;eadowood already has 41 homes, so only 9 would be allowed in this new development. :er. Larkin did not see why the road shuuld be broken. It was decided to have the Commission look over the Meadowood situation to see if both access points were desirable. Zr. Woolery moved to continue the preliminary plat application of LTH Asnociates for development of the Bartlett property on Shelburne Road until two weoks from tonight at City hall at 7:30 pm. ,,:r. Mona seconded the motion and all voted for it. U PLANNING COMMISSION 2. FFBRUARY 9, 1982 3. This approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Walsh seconded the motion. hlr. Starbuck, Aquatec's owner, said the lot was well landscaped now and he felt it would be very extensive to provide a landscaping bend. Mr. Poger said the Commission wanted a 2 year guarantee, to be sure the landscaping would survive, and he said the money could be put in escrow. The motion passed unanimously. Continuation of preliminary Nlat ap:,lication bye LTIi Associate,, for developmen of 3o co:n,uercial acres and 40 resileotial acres con%°tir.p cf 12J multi- family units and 38 house lots on property owned by i'artlett on Shelburne Rd. The question of whether to have two access points to Meadowood at Spear was discussed. Mr. Mona felt that if two were shown on the plan of record, if it turned out that only one were needed, the second need not be put in. If, however, only one is shown, it will be very hard in the future to have the second one added, so he favored showing two. Mr. 6Atz showed a map of the area. If the developer builds a road from Shelburne Road and does not connect to Meadowood, he can build 50 units. Tf he connects to Meadowood only, he can add 9 units to the 41 existinfr in that development. With both access points, he can build as many as ho wi.3hes. If the Ieadowood streets remain private, there will be no connection to them, and a second access will have to wait until the Irish property is developed, which may be years away. Ms. Rosemary Perkett was concerned that if the lower access were put in, that street would be like Laurel Hill Drive, which she felt was not safe for children. Mr. Wyckoff asked when the Shelburne Road connection would have to be built, if access were given through Meadowood and was told it would be when the loth unit was started. In regard to Ms. Perkett's concern, Mr. Spitz did not feel the condominium traffic would use that lower access, because it would be a longer way to go. INIr. Mona also felt that with two accesses, traffic would be dispersed so it would not all funnel through one area. Nor. Krebs agreed the condominium traffic would tend to use the upper access and he noted that when the Southern Connector went in, people might tend to go down and use that. Mir. Woolery asked about the utilities in the private streets at Meadowood and was told that Mr. Spitz did not think the city would allow the use of those utilities through a private development. Mr. Krebs said they could go to Green Mountain Drive and Shelburne :;oad. Mr. Walsh asked whether, if the second access were approved, the condominium access point might be moved closer to that access, but was told there was a deep ravine between the two areas, so it would not be changed. Mr. Howard Perkett questioned the lower access to I•leadowood. He was told it would be a safety factor in Meadowood. If something happened on Pheasant Way, at the top of the hill, emergency vehicles would still be able to get in from Shelburne Road. Mr. Yoger felt the second access provided a better layout for both developments and Messrs. Ilona, Woolery and Walsh ai.reed. Ms. i'erkett asked about not allowing use of the lower access for construction vehicles and Mx. Krebs felt that could be worked out. Mr. Perkett told the Commission that he, as a resident of Meadowood, did not want the second access in there. Mr. Kieran felt it would increase traffic and decrease safety, but Mr. Poger did not feel it would significantly increase traffic. Mr. Smith asked about an emergency access with a chain across it, but it was noted that that had been tried, with less than stunning success. PLANNING CU1'-7,:I:`SION 3. FT'E UARY 9. 1982 The pedestrian trails were discussed. Mr. Spitz noted that three were shown in the watercourses on the property. He liked the one through the top ravine, but did not feel that the one in the middle ravine accomplished much, and he felt that should be removed. He noted that there was a trail along, the dear of the proposed Mlilot development on Spear ;street and he said that could continue straight along the property line, or go down into the street in this 'proposed development. It was decided to have the trail continue to go straight. Mr. ?bona felt that where the pedestrian trail came very close to the corner of the private neighborhood park in Meadowood, it should be moved a few feet away. Mr. Spitz noted that there was also a trail near the Allenbrook Home. It was decided to retain this one, but not run it along the property line. Mr. Krebs had no problems with the proposal above, but said he would like to leave the item negotiable until the owner, John Larkin, could look at it. Mr. Poger said it could be discussed at final Tlat. Mr. apitz went over the comments in his 2/5/82 memo. (a) is just a comment, Mr. Krebs said that (b) was not intentional and that all setbacks would be 50'. He noted that in (c), it was intended to have some flats and some townhouse units, so they are different sizes. with regard to (d), Mr. Spitz said that usually the major streets required sidewalks on both sides and other streets had them on one. He felt the street from :Shelburne Road should have them on both sides and the others should have them on one. He said that condominium clusters usually had private walkways. It was decided to run a sidewalk around the inside of the loop and connect it to the other sidewalks. Mr. Spitz said that would mean on one side of all the streets. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the prPliminriry plat api�licationbyLTH Associates for a Planned Unit _Develop- - -- - - - __ Ment con3istin� of 120 multi -family units, 38 residential lots, and comruercia_l acreage, as depicted on a plan entitled "Preliminary _flat, Bartlett Property", ErE,p,red by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, last revised 1122 82, u_ sec t�the_followin, stipulations: 1. ::sidewalks shall be provided along both sides of the main collector street through the commercial zone and connecting to the Irish property, and along one side of all other proposed public streets. Private walkways also shall be shown on the final plat. 2. Three pedestrian trails have been shown on the preliminary plat. At final lat the location of the trails small be determined. 3. The following legal documents shall be submitted as part of the final plat applicWtion: a) Warranty deeds and offers of dedication for all proposed public streets. b) Warranty deed and offer of dedication for the proposed neighborhood park. c) Warranty deed and offer of dedication for the triangular parcel at the southwest corner of the residential zone. d) Easement deeds and offers of dedication for all 8 inch and larger sewer and water mains located outside of proposed public rights of way. 4. PLANINING CU"�`.IS:�ICi� I'I:?I-.UH%Y 9. 1c" e) Easement deed and offer of dedication for all proposed pedestrian trails. f) Private road and waiver agreement. 4. Complete drainage data shall be submitted as part of the final plat application and shall specifically address the following items: a) Protection of lots 11 through 19 from hillside surface and round water flows. b) Downstream drainage capacity and erosion impacts. 5. A teml;orary turnaround shall be provided at the dead-end street._ near lots 19 and 38. 6. All multi -family front yard setbacks shall be at least 50 feet. 7. If there is a single access from Shelburne Road, the developer can build up to 50 units. If there is a single access from !eadowood at_ Spear, the limit is 9 units. 8. The _Pheasant Way connection shall be made before the Quail Run connection. Mr. Mona seconded the motion and it carried unanimou:ily. Continuntion of site clan application and review under traffic criteria for application by Rinald and .1eatrice Precourt for conversion to retail space of a portion of a building at 1174 Williston Road Mr. Spitz explained that the front portion of the building housed Accent Travel and College Formals. They both use the basement for storage. College Formals sells both men's formalwear and women's bridal clothing now. The garage to the rear of the building is 63' long and contains 3 sections. The first section will be used for storage and the second one will be used for the bridal shop. There will be a walkthrough between the men's and women's retail areas, but the entrance to the bridal shop will be from the back. The remaining section of the garage will be used for storage. Mr. Spitz felt the retail area would require 22 parking spaces, so the maximum waiver the COMMi3Sion could grant would be 11 spaces. In addition, he felt 3 spaces should be allowed for the storage area, which brings the total to 14 spaces. 14 spaces are shown on the plan, which is to scale and all the spaces meet the requirements. The lot will be paved and the spaces striped, and all 14 will fit on this lot and still allow through traffic behind Gardenway. "r. Precourt said there was 1 full-time employee at College Formals and a couple of part-time employees. There are 3-4 employees at Accent Travel. I•Ir. Woolery said snow would have to be removed from the lot and Mr. Precourt said it would be. Mr. Poger felt the two curb cuts close together between this and the next lot were dangerous. There is an island between the two. Mr. Precourt said some new plantings would be added. Mr. Robert Lawrence, representing the Vermont Justin Corp., said he did not object; to the plan, but that Mr. Precourt could not use the property adjacent to him, which is owned by Vermont Justin Corp. 3. PLVNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 12, 1982 Mr. Wooler y asked if Mr. Wamsganz had any information on the type of sign proposed and Mr. Wamsganz said that this has not been considered. Chairman Poger told Mr. Wamsganz that the city requires bonding or money in escrow for two growing seasons. He suggested that Mr. Wamsganz talk with the city Tree Warden about different kinds of trees. Mr. Spitz said that Mr. Unsworth is sensitive as to our conservation requirements, he would not cut down anything he doesn't have to. There was a short discussion on the contour lines of the site and the amount of fill that would be needed. Mr. Wamsganz said the site would be graded down where necessary so as to limit the amount of fill needed. Chairman Poger wondered about erosion in the back of the building and said it might be advantageous to move the building 15' or so southerly. Mr. Levesque wondered if there should be a stipulation that if a second building goes in the access road would have to be paved. No decision was made on this. Mr. Woolery made a motion to continue consideration of the site plan application by Ray Unsworth for a 3600 square foot industrial building on Airport Parkwfsy just south of Lime Kiln bridge two weeks from tonight, Januar X26, 1982 at 7:30 P.M. Mr. Mona seconded the motion. The vote was five in favor of passage of the motion and one abstention by Mr. Ewing. WARNED PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary plat application by LTH Associates for development of 30 commercial acres and 40 residential acres consisting of 120 multi -family units and 38 house lots on property owned by Bartlett on Shelburne Road. Mr. Spitz said that this application will have 2 stages of public hearings, this Is the first and will be mostly about layout, the engineering would not be completed until the final stage. On a slide he pointed out the location of the proposed development saying that the applicant was more interested in the residential aspect at this time, that the zoning in the residential portion is R4. He added there would be no conflict with the view from Spear Street. He noted the application has to go through the Act 250 and there are 41 houses in the area now. Mr. Krebs then displayed plans showing the property in question and pointed out the proposed access road. He said that after talking to the state people the road was moved as far north as possible,follows the ravine on the south and goes all the way to the commercial zone. He said there were no plans yet for commercial development. The developer wants to make use of the residential land and to provide good access if the Meadowbrook Roads go public. In speaking about the major access on Route 7, Mr. Krebs said the state is working on the South Burlington Connector and he talked with Marjory Jenkins and Bill Sargent on the location, the state wants the applicant to have the road as far north as possible. He explained the state would plan a cul de sac or turn -around for Bene's restaurant and will plan a connector to run along the east side of the road. Mr. Ewing questioned the long way around that commercial traffic would have to take. Mr. Kerbs said that would be the only way. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 12, 1982 Mr. Spitz felt there were problems with the design, he did not like the 90 degree jogs on the proposed road. He said that the 2 acres of park land available and 2 acres of the Irish property would make a good sized park. Mr. Mona felt the commission was talking a lot of unknowns. The application would have to be reviewed in the status as -is, such as was done on the development of the Nowland property. Mr. Ewing agreed, saying we have to be fair, there could be no more than 50 units off a single entrance. Mr. Ewing then mentioned Shelburne's wishes to have the connecter road go down on the east side. He felt this should be resolved, Mr. Krebs should talk to the state people about Shelburne's plans. Mr. Perkett of the Meadowbrook development wondered if the 1 connection to Meadowbrook would be sufficient. Mr. Poger said probably, but the fire chief is requesting the 2 connections and the commission Was going to take a close look at the whole access matter. Mr. Bishop of Pheasant Way noted the limitation of 50 houses per entrance, saying if, Meadowbrook becomes a public way the area will contain more than 200 houses. Mr. Ewing pointed out that the requirement was 1 for 50 houses, for 2 it was unlimited. Mr. Bishop than asked what type of architecture was being proposed for the houses. Mr. Larken said he was not sure about that, he probably would sell the lots, the lots would be costly and he would presume that very nice houses would be built. Chairman Poger explained that the city has only a few limitations as to what a person can erect on his own property. Chairman Poger said the drainage, sewer, and water items would be considered on final review. Mr. Spitz said the engineering information will be made available before the next meeting. Mrs. Chaplin asked if the standing trees would be preserved, saying it would be a shame to remove them, they should be saved if at all possible. She also asked about the drainage problems that would arise. Mr. Poger said the drainage item has to go before the City Manager. Mr. Levesque said there could be a stipulation in any approval that surface run-off has to be taken care of. Mr. Poger asked the commissioners their feeling about the 90 degree angles in the road as depicted on Mr. Kerb's plans and Mr. Spitz's suggestion that they be more curved. The majority of the commissioners leaned toward the 90 degree angle. Chairman Poger asked Mr. Kerbs to check on several items, such as the lay of the road, the state access, information from the owners of the Irish property, information on Shelburne's plans, and the exact number of units being considered in this phase. Mr. Woolery made a motion to continue the Warned Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application by LTH Associates for development of 30 commercial acres and 40 residential acres con i tin of 120 multi -family units and 18 house lots on property owned by Bartlett on Shelburne Road two weeks from tonight. January 26. 1982. at 7:30 P.M. The motion was seconded by Mr. Mona and passed unanimously* ite plan application and revi is cri e i of a City Planner Spitz said he did not have any material from the Zoning Board on any action taken by them on this application. Mr. Woolery made a motion to continue consideration of the Site Plan Application of Rinald and Beatrict Preeourt two weeks from tonight, on Janury 26, 1982, at 7: 30 P.M. 5. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 12, 1982 Mr. Poger asked Mr. Spitz to check on the date the application was filed. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion which passed unanimously. Site plar. a2plication-by Du an Moore Architects for an office huildjDjLat 1775 Shelburne Road. Chairman Poger said when the commission approved this plan it was not sure of the status of the proposed South Burlington Connecter Road. Mr. Woolery said the approval has expired. We now have a vacant lot and are looking at a new application. When we looked at this last year we had a site review. No consideration was given to the South Burlington Connecter. Mr. Mona thought the commission should have a legal opinion on this application. Mr. Ewing asked if the developer had any written request for the property from the state. Mr. Feeley said the owner was not interested in selling and he had not been contacted by the state. Mr. Feeley said the owner was never notified that the connecter is an issue, he wondered why this wasn't brought up before. Mr. Ewing mentioned that consideration of the item has been before the Council and appears in the council minutes. Chairman Poger instructed Mr. Spitz to confer with the City Attorney on this, also to find out what the state is planning and if the state plans to purchase the applicant should be notified. Mr. Woolery made a motion to continue the site„ plan application by Dugan Moore Architects for an office building at 1775 Shelburne Road in two weeks, January 26, 1982 at 7:30 P.M. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion which passed unanimously. Other Business - Board of Appeal Because Mr. Ward did not approve an application for a sign the Planning Commission received a written notice that it is to act as a Board of Appeal in the matter. Chairman Poger read the notice in full. Chairman Poger instructed Mr. Spitz to be .sure to have Mr. Ward present when this item is on the agenda, to have him present a colored rendering of the sign in question, to present the relevant parts of the ordinance, the application, and his reason for denying the application. He also felt that advice from the City Attorney would be appreciated. Other Business - Tree Top Emergency Access Chairman Poger remarked that the Tree Top Homeowners Association has been very cooperative in taking care of the access up to where a chain has been placed across the road. Mr. Spitz said Mr. Szymanski has done nothing on this as yet, he feels it is a private road and not the city's concern. He will take the matter up with him again. Mr. Woolery made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 P.M. The motion was seconded by Mr. Mona and passed unanimously. Approved Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION IOVEMB!-,R 10, 1981 all the way. Mr. Poger felt that either the city or the developer should put in a warning sign. Mr. 400lery agreed that in this case a temporary fix would cause more problems than it would solve and he felt the city should do the job right. he noted that ,the Commission had started to ask developers to pay for part of the costs associated with traffic problems their traffic added to, although he noted that no residential developer had yet been asked to do that. He felt the turning movements would probably be greater than the traffic study said, but he did not think this developer should have to come uT with the final solution for the road. He mentioned some sort of formula and Mr. Spitz mentioned a figure of 43300 for this applicant's share of the inter- section improvement costs. Mr. Dona mentioned, in place of the motion he had mfide ertrlier, that equal money be put in an escrow account and used to widen Hinesburg Road in this art:a. This would be in addition to the �3300 mentioned by Mr. Spitz. Mr. Ewing said he would ar.ree to that replacement motion, but he did not know whether he could vote on the issue now.because he felt he did not have enough information on how far Hinesburg Road would have to be widened. Mr. Spitz said he would get some information on the length and dollars involved. Messrs. Mona and Ewing withdrew the motion and second. The Commission went through Mr. Spitz' suggested motion on this land. Mr. Poger asked if the Church of God objected to sharing a drive with the development and Xr. Stoddard said they did not. Mr. Poger asked about the water line loop. Mr. :spitz said the 12" main would be extended the full frontage of this property, but that it would loop from Kennedy Drive to Hinesburg Road via an 8" main. The water superintendent and Mr. spitz agreed after much discussion that it was not fair to ask this applicant to put in the 12" main there. Mr. Poger asked whether the developer would object to the city using the recreation fee anywhere in the city and after some explanation of that, Mr. Ryan said he did not object to that. Mr. Krebs said the developer was considering giving the city a triangle of land on Kennedy Drive which could be used for parking to get to the city park in the area. Mr. Poger felt that should be discussed with the planner. Mr. 'aoolery moved to continue the final plat application for Winding Brook until two weeks from tonight at City Hall at 7:30 pm. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion oand all voted for Sketch plan application bi LTH Associates Vor a planned residential and commercial development on -Bartlett property on Shelburne Road Mr. Spitz showed slides of the area. He said one major problem would be access to Shelburne Road. If the Southern Connector is built, it will conflict with the entrance to this property no matter where on the frontage the entrance is. The property also has no direct access to Allen Road and Mr. Spitz did not see a good spot for its eventual access to that road. He noted that the Pheasant ',Jay public private street case should be heard in court soon, but he did not know how fast a decision would be made. Mr. Krebs said the proposal was for a combination of single family lots and cluster housing on the residential portion of the lot. There will be some large lots next to the Meadowood at Spear development. The zoning line between residential and commercial zones has been scaled off from the zoning map, but there is one piece of land which would be excellent for a residential use and if the line goes straight until it hits a gully on 6. 1' PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEKBER 10, 1981 the land and then runs down that gully, that good piece could be developed as residential. There was no objection to that from the Commission. Mr. Poger said this developer might be asked to provide access to Green Mountain Power's landlocked property next to it. Mr. Krebs said they had tried to minimize the number of times they had to cross ravines on the land. They would like to mn_ke the ravines property lines whenever possible, because that tends to define the boundaries and minimizes the area that cannot be used. Mr. Poger mentioned residential access only from Spear Street and commercial access only from Shelburne Road. He asked what type of commercial use would go in here, but Mr. Larkin said he was concentrating on the residential land first. He would like to develop and sell that and then work on the commercial land. Mr. Poger said office space would probably be the best use, if the land could be sold for that. Mr. Larkin did not see anything like a supermarket going on the land. Mr. Mona did not like the cluster housing in a peninsula next to lots 21 and 29 and putting in some smaller lots like those in Brookwood was mentioned by Mr. Poger. Mr. Woolery did not agree with that. Mr. Ewing did not want trailer trucks coming up through the residential development from the commercial area to get to Spear Street. Mr. Levesque suggested that one of the bridges carry a load limit so that it could not carry a truck. Other suf;gestions were cutting off access between the two areas, making the road with many curves, or putting up "No Through Traffic" signs. Yr. Mona noted that until the court case was settled, the residential area had no public access the Commission wanted it to use. Mr. Spitz felt an easement would be needed so that it could eventually go to Allen Road. Mr. Mona did not want to add this number of units to the Pheasant Way access to Spear Street. Mr. Poger said the number of units could be limited until there was a second access. Mr. IMona did not object to the housing using the access to Shelburne Road and he felt traffic the other way could be controlled. :sir. Woolery felt that when the property next to this was developed, access could be to Allen Road and the commercial road could be made a cul-de-sac. Mr. Larkin said he wanted to put in the residential area first, and if he had to build the road all the way up from Shelburne Road to do it, he would do that. Mr. Poger noted that if Pheasant 'clay and Quail Run became public streets, he would not have to build the road all the way down there. Theref was no objection to the concept proposed here - it is just a question of access. Other business Mr. Spitz had submitted a memo dated 11/6/81 entitled "Policy for Determining Applicant's Responsibility for Off -Site Street and Intersection Improvements". Mr. Poger read it. It recommends a 10 instead of 5 year study period and there was general agreement with that. Mr. Spitz said he felt the city needed some permanent traffic counting stations. He also noted that this memo was only a start, and may have to be modified later. Mr. Jacob said he was confused by the 1Cj9-30io coverage situation and asked that it be discussed at a meeting in the near future. The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 pm. Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION 27 June 1995 page 3 1. A11 _previous a_ppro_vals _and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The 10 foot curb cut and the access drive serving lots #1 2 and B shall be widened to 12 feetrior to the issuance of a zoninq permit for development -of lots #1 or #2. 3. The sewer line serving lots 1 and 2 shall be _privately owned and maintained by the lot owners. The utility easement shall de- fine this responsibility for maintenance and re air. 4. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Attorney, the le al documents for the 20 foot r.o.w. and utilit,.Y easement. These documents shall be recorded in the land__ recordsrior to recording the final plat.plans. The easement deed shall define res onsibilit for maintenance and re air. 5. The final pat shall be recorded in the South Burlin ton Land Records within 90 da s or this approval is null and void. The plat shall be signed by the_Planninq Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording._ Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion assed unanimousl . 4. Public Hearing: Revised Final Plat application of John Larkin to amend an approved planned residential development consisting of 120 multi -family units and 37 single family lots, Harbor View Road and Baycrest Drive. The amendment consists of revising the layout of "Cluster C" which consists of 5 duplex buildings on 1.5 acres of land: Mr. Rabideau said there will be 10 units in 5 footprints. It is Anticipated they will be upscale duplexes. The lot is 10 feet wider than previously shown, so they have increased the width of the driveway to 24 ft. and made some of the driveways a little deeper. They have added three more guest parking spaces and one space for a bike rack. The patios have been identified as an "on -grade amenity" as requested by the Commission. They are not subject to setback re- quirements. The utility plan has been changed to incorporate a retention basin. All utilities have been added. Mr. Rabideau said they talked with neighbors about keeping traffic from coming out the north access. It is suggested the road be made one-way coming in from the north. PLANNING COMMISSION 27 June 1995 page 4 Mr. Frank, resident of the last house east of the property, raised the question of drainage. Mr. Rabideau said the piping has been sized to handle the volume. Mr. Weith said Mr. Audette is satisfied. The easement needs to be extended to cover all the pipe. Also, drainage from the Irish property to the south should be made to flow to the east to get to the pipe. It shouldn't be allowed to pond. Another resident said they would like to see access for emergency vehicles only. Mr. Larkin said he had no problem with a chain across the access. He noted those chains have a way of being broken and removed. Members agreed to give a chain a try. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final platap2lication of John Larkin to amend an approve planned res- idential development consisting of 120 multi-famil units and 37 sin le-famil units Ba crest Drive. The amendment consists of revising the la out of five duplex buildings on 1.5 acres of land (i.e "Cluster C") as depicted on a two page set of Tans a e one entitled "Site Plan Harbor Hei hts Duplexes," re ared b Krebs & Lansinq Consultinq Enqineers, Inc, and dated 6/13/95, with the following stipulations: 1. All_2Etyj2aE_.aE2j2yals and stipulations which are not -super- seded by this a1212rova1 shall remain in effect. 2. The Planning Commission approves a 30 foot PUD perimeter setback as shown on the Glans. 3. Prior to issuance of a zoning ermit the a licant shall ost a $20 000 landsca e bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three vears to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a aood chance of survivina. 4. Prior to issuance of a zonin ermit the a licant shall a the sewer allocation fee. 5. All exterior lighting shall consit of downcastinq shielded luminaires so as not to cast li ht beyond thep_rq_pf�rty line. An new lighting or change in lighting shall be a roved by the Cit Planner prior to installation. The___applicant shall submit re- vised specifications for building mounted li hts to the Cit Planner for approval prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 6. The lan shall be revisedprior to recording the final plat plans to show the drainage easement extended in order to encompass the entire draina e i e on the southern and western boundary. The le al documents for this easement shall be recorded priorto recording the final plat plans. The legal documents shall require review and approval by the Citv Attorney PLANNING COMMISSION 27 June 1995 page 5 prior to recordin . 7. As expressly represented by the appli,cant, the new draina e system along the southern_property_ line shall be designed so as to properly accommodate any existing storm water coming__from t_he__ Irish property. 8. The -applicant shall block the northerly access with a break- away chain or gate whichever is a roved by_the Fire Chief. Th plan shall be revised to indicate that such a c_hai_ n or gate will be provided. 9. The revised final platplanshall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Thelat shall be signed by the Planninq Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of Scott Pike to reduce the size of a previously approved automobile showroom addition from 2600 sq. ft. to 1080 sq. ft., 2073 Williston Rd: Mr. Dugan said that in 1992 the Commission approved the addition to PJ's for a showroom. It was not built at that time. They would now like a smaller version of the addition in the same area, attached at the same spot. The only change is the addition of a handicapped parking space. Mr. Burgess noted the applicant is not displaying vehicles in the designated display area. Mr. Weith said they are pretty close to compliance and he didn't see a problem as long as adequate aisles are kept. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan a lication of Scott Pike to amend an approved site lan for con- struction of a 900 sq. ft. addition and 2600 s . ft. addition to an existing buildinq used for automobile sales and service 2073 Williston Road. The amendment consists of reducing the size of the 2600 sq. ft. showroom addition to 1 080 s . ft. as depicted on a plan entitled "P.J.'s Auto Villa e re ared b Fitz atric. Llewellyn, Inc, dated 1.0_/9.2,_ last revised__-6 23f95, with the fol- lowing__stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and sti ulatons which are not super- seded by this a roval shall remain in effect. 2. For purposes of calculatin road impact fees under the South Burlington Im act Fee Ordinance the Commission estimates that the ro osed addition will enerate three additional P.M. eak z. ING COMMISSION anuary 1986 y L f- S. Maher then polled members as to their feelings on the open space/agricultural land question. Ms. Peacock said she w-'`was more concerned with protecting open space than farmland. Mr. Belter noted the land in question would not be attractive to a farmer and his concern was to get recreation land for the city. He favored Mrs. Lafleur's third option. Both Mrs. Hurd and Mr. Burgess agreed with Mr. Belter. Mrs. Maher said she agreed that the 15% that comes to the city should be all usable land. Mr. Spitz said they will prepare preliminary plans showing about 7 acres in the middle and 3-1/2 to 4 up front; at the appropriate time of engineering, they will show all drainage. At preliminary plat time, they will approach the state under criteria 9 and 10. Mrs. Maher said she would not vote yes for such a proposal. Mrs. Hurd agreed. Mr. Burgesssaid he would have to see the plan. Mr.rBelt;er---said it was to the City's advantage to get as oig a piece of land together as possible but felt it was better to get more land in the upper right hand corner of the plan so it could tie in with future land. Ms. Peacock said if the land in the middle were well - drained, she had no objection. Mr. Brown said he had in mind filling it in, not leaving a swamp. Other Business 1. Mrs. Lafleur referred to the Natural Resources Committee memo on air quality and traffic. They are concerned with the cumu- lative affect of metre small developments as an air quality study is required only for University Mall. The Committee asked the Commissi©n to monitor air quality levels on Dorset St., a request endorsed by the Dorset St. Committee. Mrs. Lafleur will investigate costs, etc. 2. A verdict is expected soon on the Pizzagalli suit in connection, with the sewage treatment plant. 3. Mrs. Lafleur advised that John Larkin had let 90 days expire before filing the Cluster C & D record copies, and the City Attorney asked that the Commission sign a resolution to validate the plans. Mr. Powell said that he cannot get clear title to his home and cannot move in until this is done. Mr. Jacob moved that the Commission sign the resolution. Mr. Belter- seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 4. Members agreed to meet with the Burlington Planning Commission on Tuesday, 18 February,with the meeting to be held in South Burlington. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:15 pm. I LANN I N(; CUMMISSION JUN-1 6, 19,92 has added a line of windows to his overhead door line. Mr. Adams noted that the area in the rear was heavily treed, but that if any landscaping were added, it perhaps should be between this property and the Bouchard property. Mr. Spit; said the rear could not be used for anything. Mr. Adams said that if the cedar hedge were left as is, it would make a captive area in the back which would eliminate the possibility of access back there. Mr. Woolery wanted to be sure it was understood that that land was unusable and that there would be no rk:quests later to use it. Mr. Levesque pointed out that the city park in the area had never been built. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Overhead Door Company for a 4160 sq. ft. addition as depicted on a plan entitled "Overhead Door Company, San Remo Drive," prepared by Adams Construction Company, Inc., last revised June 3, 1982� suUeet to the following stipulations: 1. '�ithin the rear 32 feet of the property there shall be no new building, gravel area, or outside storage and the existing trees and natural buffer el,all be maintained. 2. A $1,000 landscaping bond shall be provided. 3. This approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion. Mr. Woolery noted that the landscaping bond was for two growing seasons. Tne motion carried unanimously. Fines: :1<:t application bj LTH Associates for development of 40 residential and c_,,mmercial acres on property opined by Bartlett on Shelburne Road. Project contains 120 units of multi -family housing and 37 individual house lots Mr. -spitz said that the notice which went to the newspaper and the abuttors said this was preliminary, not final plat. He said that was a subst>>nti.al mistake and that he did not feel approval should be given tonight. He felt the essential items should be reviewed tonight. A member of the audience said many abuttors were not here tonight because of the mistake. Mr. Walsh did not feel discussion should take place without the abuttors and Mr. Kieran added that he did not feel this was a legal discussion, since it did not have prober notification so all the abuttors could hear the full discussion. `fir. Spitz said the meeting had been warned and that only one word wa3 in error. He felt the Commission could go through the information and ask questions but he said they should be prepared to go through it all again later. Mr. Mona asked the earliest time this could be heard if the proper warning were sent out and was told it was July 13. Mr. Walsh moved that the hearing on the Bartlett property be continued un_tl ;)ro-ierly warned, and heard on July 13. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. Mr. Jacob asked how much of a burden this would put on the applicant. Mr. Larkin said it would be a large burden and that he would rather hear it tonight hnd take his chances on having to hear it all over again. Mr. Mona noted that if it were heard tonight, the Commission might find something it was not happy with and that could be resolved for the next hearing. There were 5 abuttors present. The motion failed with Mr. Walsh voting aye. No action will be taken tonight, Mr. Woolery said. PLANNUNG, COMMISSION 4. JUNE 8. 1982 Mr. Robert Krebs, the applicant's engineer, said the basic layout had not changed since preliminary plat. He noted that a lot hinged on whether or not the streets in Meadowood at Spear were declared public or private by the courts. The top portion of the plan will be watered and sewered from Meadowood at Spear if the streets are public, and from Shelburne Road if they are not. Either way, the lower part will come from Shelburne Road. If they have V., have the water come from Shelburne Road, there will have to be a booster station or they will have to get access to the tank through the Irish land. Mr. Spitz said there were street, water and sewer questions for this development hinging on the Meadowood streets, and Mr. Krebs stated that the developer knew he was at risk with this development because of that. Mr. Krebs said all the streets would have storm water systems and there will be a retention pond. He then addressed the points in the City Manager's June 4, 1)82 memo. He said numbers 1 and 4 were no problem. #2 he did not o`:.jc;ct to except there were some areas where they would like to minimize the fill. and leave the sidewalks closer to the road. Mr. Spitz suggested that Mr. Krebs go over the areas with fill on a case -by -case basis with the City 'r:r,-ineer. Mr. Krebs said #3 was no problem, but he asked about how #5 was han-led. Mr. Spitz said he would check. Mr. Krebs then went through Mr. Spl.tz' June 4 memo. Mr. Krebs said he would like to resolve the street grade is. -.axe with the City Engineer. He did not want to make a 7-8' cut to Shelburne Road, especially since that might cause problems when the Southern Connector. goes in. Mr. Spitz said that could be cleaned up by July. Sidewalks were discussed. Mr. Krebs said they were proposed for one side of the road only. Mr. Spitz said the question was whether to have them on one or both sides of the road in the commercial area, and whether to have them on three spurs of road in the residential area. He felt there should be walks on the s;)ur leading to the Irish land and the Commission decided it wanted walks on all three spurs pointed out by Mr. Spitz. As far as the commercial area, ;.r `,pitz noted that Corporate Circle had walks on both sides. Mr. WDolerO .,lt that if the development were at a certain density or of a certain type t.x.^a should be walks on both sides. Warehousing uses, for example, wcu?.d not need walks on both sides. It was decided to require them on one side definitely, with the option to require them on both sides at site -plan. Mr. Spitz said the question of downstream storm drainage vat an 'issue -' as a result of the Pecor development. He said there was no good city review of how to handle this and how far downstream to go. Mr. Krebs said they would not increase the volume of water, and he did not think they would change the rate of flow that much. Mr. Jacob said the back of some of the Meadowood lots were wet. Mr. Krebs said the system would pick up water from above and transfer it to a drainage ditch below. He noted that there was a catch -basin on Pheasant Way which did not work, and this development would catch some of that runoff which went through Meadowood backyards. Mr. Krebs noted that lot #17, which is not a building lot, will be split and added to lots it abuts. It wns originally a lot for drainage only. Mr. Spitz said that in the Pecor development, extensive drainage improvements were put across the top of the Meadowood lots. He did not feel that was needed here, but he wanted buyers to know that water would come over that hill unimpeded and they will have to take care of it themselves. He mentioned putting something in the deeds. Mr. Levesque felt it should be stipulated that the developer improve that. He said the buyers should be protected. He felt that as the lots were subdivided, in the deed it should be noted that perimeter drains should be put in around the foundations. Mr. Larkin agreed to that. Mr. Spaulding said slab construction 5. PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 8, 1982 could be used. Mr. Mona said they would look into how to protect the buyers. Mr. Krebs said they would have wording on the final plat so the pedestrian trail could go anywhere in the CO zone. He said landscaping would cost about 330,000 and they will screen the storm water filters and he asked about street trees. Mr. Spitz referred him to Section 412.4 in the Subdivision Regulations on that and he noted that he had no letter from the fire chief, but a verbal indication that there is no major problem with the plan. Mr. doolery moved to continue the hearing warred as preliminary plat but put on the agenda as final plat for the LTH Associates development on the Bartlett property - next hearing to be considered and warned as final plat on July 13, 1982 at City Hall at 7:30 pm. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Application by Jean R. Reardon for a photo kiosk in the parking lot of the Merrill Theatre complex on Williston Road Mr. Spitz said the 'Zoning Board had granted a multiple use permit last nib -tit, with the feeling that the Commission would review circulation. The application is subject to review under site plan and under the traffic review section since it is an addition of traffic in excess of the C1/2 zoning. Mr. Jhck Reardon said the kiosk would be built on an existing island on the lot. The building is 8' x 4' and sits on a 7' pad. The island is 7' wide by 40' long. It is 120' inside the complex entrance. He said that since the complex had been approved, two retail establishments had closed, so he did not feel this would increase traffic on the lot. Mr. Jarvis said the Home Emporium had given way to a game arcade, which generates foot and bike traffic, and an art store had given way to his theatre offices. Mr. Reardon anticipated from 35-60 cars per day would visit, based on a similar location in New Hampshire. The kiosk in Essex Junction generates more traffic, bec,.3use there is a grocery store in that mall, which draws the kind of customer this business relates to. It is also much more visible than this one. Hours are now 9 am to 9 pm, but they may reduce them. Mr. Spitz said that at the Essex Jct. location he saw one car being waited on, and 2 cars and a bike waiting. Xr. Walsh noted that that was a very congested area and he was concerned about the traffic pattern and stacking. Mr. Jarvis said most of the business generated by this use would be at times when the parking lot is empty, because the theatres generate cars at night. Mr. Launderville said that after 6 pm there were very few transactions - they stay open in order to call people to say their film is ready. Mr. Reardon noted that the building had two sides, and people could stack on both sides. Mr. Ewing noted that stacking cars would block the travel part of the area. N"r. Krascner felt cars would be making tight turns around the island, and idr. Reardon mentioned directional arrows on the pavement. ',:r. Levesque felt the yellow of the proposed building would not blend in c.-ith the architecture or landscaping in the area. :;r. Ewing suggested moving the building to the east end of the island, to allow more room for cars to stack. Mr. Reardon said that could be done. Mr. ::,fling felt striping would be helpful. Mr. Walsh said he had trouble with thi> traffic pattern in this congested area. Mr. Mona noted that if the busin(sses on the lot already did not attract the people who would be coming to the booth, then there would be cars turning in and out from Williston Road, and he was concerned about additional turning movements on Williston Road. Mr. Reardon said their peak hours were 10-12 and 3-5. Mr. Levesque asked that the original permission for the project be researched NIQUETTE, NIQUETTE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 9-0 EAST ALLEN STREET POST OFFICE BOX a WINOOSKI, VT 05404-0001 (802) 055-0575 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Rece� 0 19 9Sat Recorded in Vol. on page i�� Of So. Burlington Land Necor s o1$d Attest: c EWER AND WATERLINE EASEMENT Margaret A. Picard, City Clerk KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that LTH ASSOCIATES, a Vermont partnership with place of business in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, and JOHN LARKIN, INC., a Vermont corporation with place of business in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the Grantors"), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents, do hereby GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM Unto the CITY of SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality, situated in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), and its successors and assigns, an easement or easements in perpetuity, twenty feet (20') in uniform width, for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, restoring and/or replacing sewerlines or waterlines, together with all appurtenances thereto, on, under and through the following property: Being a strip of land, twenty feet (20') in uniform width as depicted on a plan entitled "Horizontal Layout, Bartlett Property," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated June 1983, of record in Plat Book 200, on Page 27, of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Being a portion of the land and premises Grantor, LTH Associates, acquired from Frank E. Bartlett, et al, by Warranty Deed dated November, 1982, and recorded in Volume 184, at Pages 316-319 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The interest of LTH Associates was conveyed to RET, Inc., RHH, Inc. and John Larkin, Inc. by Quit Claim Deed dated December 30, 1994, of record in Volume 372, on Page 425 of said Land Records. The interest of RET, Inc. and RHH, Inc. was conveyed to John Larkin, Inc. by Quit Claim Deed dated January 2, 1998, of record in Volume 423, on Pages 235-238 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Grantors, and their heirs, successors, and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the land subject to this sewer and waterline easement such as not to be inconsistent with the use of the easements by the within Grantee, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping, or other improvements within said sewer and waterline easement which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to exercise its rights granted hereunder. The Grantee, for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this sewer and waterline easement shall be restored to its condition prior to such entry at its own cost and within a reasonable time period. This sewer and waterline easement shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey any sanitary sewer pipelines, waterline pipelines, manholes and any appurtenances located on, under and through the easement herein conveyed. Reference is hereby made to the above -referenced plan, deeds and records, all in further aid of this description. NIQUETTE, NIQUETTE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 7-0 EAST ALLEN STREET POST OFFICE BOX , WINOOSKI, VT 05404-0001 (802) 655-0575 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, for its own use and behoof forever; and the Grantors for themselves and their successors and assigns, do covenant with the Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents they are the sole owners of the premises and have good right and title to convey the same in the manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and they hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this Iq day of OCTpB e--Y2 , 1998. IN PRESENCE OF: LTH A OCIATES � By: John Larkin Its ly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At South Burlington in said County this q day of Oe rpgr--r— , 1998, John P. Larkin personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of LTH Associates. Before me, Notary Public IN PRESENCE OF: JOHN KIN, INC.. By: J ohn ar , President and ly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At South Burlington in said County this 01 day of o'cTU561t— , 1998, John P. Larkin personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of John Larkin, Inc. A Before me, Ivy Notary Public Vermont Property Transfer Tax 32 V.S.A. Chap 231 h" ��t",. ..': ;•`��`; P�i� ^..:gyp �;n CE 'r.c A T'r! CrRT. RE C'D. DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACT. CERT. REC'D Clerk NIQUETTE, NIQUETTE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 7-9 EAST ALLEN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1 WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404-0001 RUSSELL F. NIQUETTE, JR. TELEPHONE TELECOPIER 802-655-0575 802-655-1388 September 18, 1998 Mr. Ray Belaire, Planner City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Bartlett Subdivision Dear Ray: RUSSELL F. NIQUETTE, SR. 1907-1995 I enclose an executed deed to an easement over Lots 44 through 50 of the Bartlett Subdivision residential lots. The easement is for utilities, maintenance and repair on lines already installed. It appears your water department needs to know that such an easement exists before they will make a connection to Lot 50. Please call with any questions in this regard. Since ely, u 11 F. Niquette, Jr. RFN/blw Enclosures cc: Joseph McLean, Esq. (with copy of deed) John P. Larkin FORM 911 VERMONT WARRANTY DEED. REV. 10/93 TUTBLANX REGISTERED U. S. PATENT OFFICE TUTTLE LAW PRINT, PUBLISHERS. RUTLAND, VT 05702 !,Know all Ilersons hu 01 4rst Presients ` 4at LTH ASSOCIATES and JOHN LARKIN, INC., a Vermont corporation So. Burlington Chittenden Of in the County of and State of Vermont Grantor , in the consideration of ---Ten and More--- Dollars paid to their full satisfaction by CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation Of So. Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont Grantee , by these presents, do freely Cue, (6rant, #ell, Tonueg Ana Cnunfirm unto the said Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON easement and its heirs and assigns forever, a certain piece ofland in So. Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: An easement 20 feet in width for the purpose of the installation, repair, maintenance and replacement of a sanitary sewer line and water line servicing Lots 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 and 50. The location of the within conveyed easement is depicted on a plan of lands entitled "Horizontal Layout, Bartlett Property" prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated June, 1983, of record in Plat Book 200 on Page 27 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above mentioned plan in further aid of this description. 00 Maut Aub 010 MOO said granted premises, with all the privileges and ap- purtenances thereof, to the said Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON its heirs and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; And the said Grantor LTH ASSOCIATES and JOHN LARKIN, INC. for themselves and their heirs, executors and administrators, do covenant with the said Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURRINGTON, its heirs and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents the sole owner of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are +firer _+Aram 47uerp Encumbrance: except as herein stated, and they hereby -engage to Warrant Aub Defenb the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as herein stated. N Witness 194creaf, I hereunto set my hand and seal this ftzz�/� day of �fetn hzmber A.D.19 98 Jn ence�of C 41 �� �il/u By: By: _*tare (Of lRermont Tountg of Chittenden }ss. 5IA L. S. t L. S. L. S. John P. Larkin, Its Pres. and L.S. Authorized Agent At Wa_r -PWif V`-this day o _, -A.D. 19 98 John P. Larkin personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, e his free act and deed. and the free act and deed o H As§`9 ciat "-�Nd John Larkin, Inc. Before me Notary Public (Title) 0 W U Q ��., O � O w wQ �D Q z o A U Q W W O a; O p x W O q - Q South Burlington Recreation Area i L. mr � • s.s r •...w < Gr d born vxw, ea�r; 00 aster. r 4 S � �• 4 Drry d S.vnWnq<n �GY d Swn. ew"p. C�,rRbr. w. e z5^az os' rr T IDOD: D O' Dd N L • 9G D. F. 1919E • 9ewa � nrec First Burlington ReoHy Corp_ Farrell mod polen _P. t Aw 447Vsf Ne ar.< I...•< I� Mc Mohan 13C/3224 \ , I . j 09 kN T • DOCK N Ofi OS 03y,_,A r - 135TSM' Mc tl 133525 w @ a • o9ef9136' 9'PiYyg�`•fl 5 &, L • ' _ T \ N N • �bs' leron 171/SIS r\ Meodowood at .So00r Ri aT4m u:n» r = .n Collins 142/444 C7� rc°5! \:`194st 8Bm. UJ.J PerkeH--175/29f /'� r = •' A E g. W jho1f//f{�_�I16\/7/269,\ `/ O,o •�7 s� o'\ T• °` c Baser 163/217, v \c\4 \' �\. ��\��7, �9c C/�" code 1� 75 Marsilli 16T/392\ i 4 \�a ° s t$17 f [ � Dw er\roc w di Location Map 4 a.n a Bourn �\ G, d Seer rr•.lo `�'� \ \ \\ \\"10 \ S y •}1' r E 2 Oo ' aft r �—Ilea y < pes ee.e Nee•a%h " ^B!P M dB�~ _,� M T gm�' .2wN.Vr +�u. 1Z oST . WIX l 21, MGv d How. brew, " S83 S5T< \e—rwsss':—dIrish a5 4i. i Sixteen Ninety SheltWne Road Inc. Conca-d k7vestrnent Group RE C El Iv E :s. JUN 1 6 1997 City of So. Burlington Nsghborhood AvA rti era sour" �uxLlwTUN 169 m s: / \ \ °sr• y�W. ik Leoerd concrete rrror.rr errt found Non Poe ford mo ❑ GD-role nument ear o iron pope set Property corner m1wbisd (rn wrorurr.ntallon set) G Control point Popery Ins Frich- I certify Bros the srvey a mrrecf based upon etfamonar abstrxred From pertmv deeds ad maps and on evderrce bud n the fkld. #'L 61, 5 Fbbert C Of pt Of Rr•Dvz<+ WRY Bishop 1s4/n2 t� Mecidowood (it SF�vicii • \ �5 tx. .tna.00m i Wa�o'oo�_4n BDm1L np. Irish n• noea.ccm ayes I Lot 16 and Lot 17 ae one tuibrq b1 and roll not to tar 17 a rcr b be deed as o WON lot ad Is arty to ororeq prpoem 2 NI Wshry sawrrets, wren eosrrres, a.er smaneres ad dlara9 00" be IC emn side of aeertre of pipes eeedad.n a buo aarkxm a or —me noleo S Sheers 1-23 we an Nepal pat of the blot prop!. 9red dnld rC be reed mpaolr7 Uo not scole off amenrms or bocitam d buildnpy .tiNes a On+rrW*L 4. Conbct orgr.er and notify rmedidly In srkV pry boxslndon d any reornsi Woo 5 Rode rrgtrtaf-woy to include I0rr1YMon0e on all oarsr Ira ed daelrs m t 1l 0 50 100 200 300 Sao eT Scm r . IOCr FINAL PLAT pry, 9 N. Check" s BMW BARTLETT PROPERTY f�. IJC• D.t. 111112mh M, proj.ef e!133 U.S. %* 7 9a KRESS K LANSING CONSULTING EmGmEERSF ■iC• -J fMEUPJRBE, VERMONT OS482 y AR-- M—I, 22,9e3.td A R—d Jury 6. 1%3 M r F—d Serf. 2e. 1%2 I*.W Seat 3. 1983 l.4 7/2!Ve6 r4 444" � VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) ' SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER [DENT. NO, LTH Associates 410 Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington. VT 05401 John Larkin, Inc. 03-0278491 = BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. City ot So. Burlington 575 Dorset St., So. Burlington, VT 05403 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) DATE OF CLOSING Bartlett Sub., So. Burlington INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 112 INTEREST 5. ❑ TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. ❑ EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED _% INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH TOTAL ACREAGE BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT 1HE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. U NONE 5. ❑ BARN 9.0 STORE 2. ❑FACTORY 8. ❑ DWELLING UNITS MULTI -FAMILY WITH ( ) TRANSFERRED 10.❑ OTHER MOBILE HOME DESCRIBE 3. ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. El MOBILE 4. ❑ CAMP/VACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( INSERT ) UNITS TRANSFERRED NUMBER CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): X�-� 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE3. El CAMP/VACATION 5. El OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL__9.10 OTHEAaSement DESCRIBE DESCRIBE 2. OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. ❑ INDUSTRIAL__ DESCRIBE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE3. ❑ CAMP/VACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL__ _ _,,9. El OTHER easement DESCRIBE DESCP18E 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENTUSE8. ❑ INDUSTRIAL . DESCRIBE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND DEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farminnd or Working Fnrminnd Tax Abatement Use Value Apprnlsnl Programs)? ❑ Yos k] No IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and 0 BELOW. # TOTAL PRICE PAID FOR PRICE PAID FOR PRICE PAID $ 00.. PERSONAL PROPERTY $_ REAL PROPERTY $ 00 IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: • - TAX DUE: Enter amount from rnto schedule on rsvorsn side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS 1-$ 00 • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED _ # 6 IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK TOWN/CITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER PAGE NO. _ LISTED VALUE $ GRAND LIST OF 19 PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I TOWN NUMBER RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REQUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK Form PT-1 (12/92) RATE SCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructions) ........................ b. Value of property enrolled In current use prograrn.................................................................................. c. Value of qualified working farm.................................................................................................................. d. Add Lines 1(a), (b) and (c)........................................................................................................................... e. Tax rate.......................................................................................................................................................... f. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(a)........................................................ 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line O on front of return.............................................................................................. b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above............................................................................... c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(a)................................................................................................................. d. Tax rate........................................................................................................................................................... s. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d)......................................................... 3. Total Tax Due: Add Lines 1(0 and 2(e) and enter here and on Line P on front of return ................................................ .......................:.. 2. a. $ N/A .......................... b. $ .......I .................. c. $ ..........I..............I d. ...........I .............. a.$ N/A 3. $ N/A 0.005 FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyer(s) and Sellers) certify as follows: A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property, B. That the seller(*) advised the buyer(a) that local and elate building regulations, zoning rejlulalions and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may limit significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer Is In compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. _ and lu In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number 1 Number of acres b. Parcel retalned: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office in your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Seller(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of ronlgroportyy and any development theroon is In compliance with or oxempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act 250), for the following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. _ _ and Is In compliance with sold pormit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from Instructions) b E. That this transfor does/dons not (ntrlke one) result In a partition or division of lend. Note: if It does, en Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form HEW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer Is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): �❑ 1. Seller(s) certlfles that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2, Buyer(s) certifies that the parties ob►alned withholding certificate no._ ________ from the Commissioner of faxes In advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this Is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) Is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee In a foreclosure or transfer In lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE H EBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE it 11 � / Preparer's SignA-1'ur P.O. Box 1, Preparer's Address Russell F. Ninuette, Jr. ' Prepared by _ Winoos j_9, VT 540 Buyer's Representative Tel. (Print or Type) Keep a copy of this rolurn for your records. PLADENING COMMI SION 28 4antigry 1 pa ge 4 Mrs. Maher then polled members as to their feelings on the open space/agricultural land question. Ms. Peacock said she was more concerned with protecting open space than farmland. Mr. Belter noted the land in question would not be attractive to a farmer and his concern was to get recreation land for the city. Me favored Mrs. Lafleur's third option. Both Mrs. Hurd and Mr. Burgess agreed with Mr. Belter. Mrs. Maher said she agreed that the 15% that comes to the city should be all Alsable land. Mr. Spitz said they will prepare preliminary plans showing about 7 acres in the middle and 3-1/2 to 4 up front; at the appropriate time of engineering, they will show all drainage. At preliminary plat time, they will approach the state under criteria 9 and 10. Mrs. Maher said she would not vote yes for such a proposal. Mrs. Hurd agreed. Mr. Burgess said he would have to see the plan. Mr.-Beiter-said it was to the City's advantage to get as ]pig a piece of land together as possible but felt it was better to get more. land in the upper right hand corner of the plan so it could tie in with future land. Ms. Peacock said if the land in the middle were well - drained, she had no objection. Mr. Brown said he had in mind filling it in, not leaving a swamp. Other Business 1. Mrs. Lafleur referred to the Natural Resources Committee memo on air quality and traffic. They are concerned with the cumu- lative affect of more small developments as an air quality study is required only for University Mall. The Committee asked the Commisdibm.to monitor air quality levels on Dorset St., a request endorsed by the Dorset St. Committee. Mrs. Lafleur will investigate costs, etc. 2. A verdict is expected soon--on,the Pizzagalli suit in connection, with the sewage treatment plant. 3. Mrs. Lafleur advised that John Larkin had let 90 days expire before filing the Cluster C & D record copies, and the City Attorney asked that the Commission sign a resolution to validate the plans. Mr. Powell said that he cannot get clear title to his home and cannot move in until this is done. Mr. Jacob a Ne er sec® Members on Tuesday, Burlington. that the Commission sign the resolution. Mr. agreed to meet with the Burlington Planning Commission 18 February,with the meeting; to be held in South As there was the meeting Post -its Fax Note 76 1 Date l '�, � �. pages To :7tIE ' LRA iV From / n > Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # Commission, PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Tuesday 24 September City Hall, 575 Dorset Members Present 24 SEPTEMBER 1985 Planning Commission held a meeting on 1985 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room St. Mary -Barbara Maher, Chairman, Judith Hurd, William Burgess, James McClary, John Dooley, John Belter, Peter Jacob Others Present Jane Lafleur, City Planner, John Larkin, R. Krebs, Don Allen, Daniel O'Brien, John Rider, Valerie Rider, Fred Smith, Eliz- abeth Edwards, Reg Boucher, Mary Silverman, Bill Robenstein, Joseph Schall, Eugene Alexander, Peter Allison, Blake Stimson, Jeffrey Nelson, R. Stewart Wooster, Doug Fitzpatrick, Kathleen Huffman, Bob Duncan, Lynn Charlier PUBLIC HEARING; Revised Final Plat of LTH Associates for revision of 20 units in Cluster D to 7 single family lots and 10 units in Cluster C to 5 single family lots Mr. Kreps said the lots are immediately to the east of the flats and townhouses already built. There is a good buffer of pine trees. They would like curb cuts for each lot, but lot 43 has no frontage, so access would be through an ease- ment on lot 39 where there is already a curb cut. Mr. Dooley said he was troubled by this and members agreed it should not be allowed. Mrs. Lafleur said there is a problem with a street name in Cluster D and Mr. Larkin said this can be changed. Members agreed that Wagner, Heindel & Noyes should check the erosion question. Mrs. Maher said there have been complaints about the condition of the streets in the development. Mr. Larkin said the roads will be blacktopped by the end of October. PUBLIC HEARING: Revised final plat of LTH Associates for the subdivision of Cluster B into 2 lots located on Harbor View Rd. Mr. Larkin said they had run into a title insurance problem and that phasic the project would solve this. Mrs. Lafleur said they could stipulate there could be no higher density than now approved. One concern is that the road remain open to Cluster A through Cluster B. Mr. Dooley moved that tlla,5 Burlington Planning Commission approve tb.Q- Levised Final plat of ,�T, Associates for the sub- • PLANNING COMMISSION 24 SEPTEMBER 1985 PAGE 2 division of Cluster B of Harbor Heights into 2 lots of 1.7 and 2.2 acres as depicted on a plan entitled "Revised Lot Plan, Harbor Heights, Cluster B" dated April 1984, prepared Krebs and Lansing with the following stipulations: 1. Access to Cluster A through Cluster B shall remain open and appropriate amendments to legal documents, including condo by-laws shall be approved by the City Attorney and recorded with the City Clerk within 90 days to insure this. 2. All approvals of the original subdivision (7/13/82) shall remain in effect. 3. The density of units, now at 16, in the 1.7 acre lot shall not be increased in the future because of this subdivision. 4. The Final Plat shall be recorded with the City Clerk within 90 days. Mr. Jacob seconded, and the motion passed 6-0 with Mr. McClary abstaining. y, PUBLIC HEARING: Revised Final Plat of O'Brien Brothers for the 4 lot subdivision of Foxcroft (Cardinal Woods Extension) Mr O'Brien said there would be no change in use and no change in density. This was approved as 1 project and they now want to set up a separate organization for each use. The attorney says this will be a simpler procedure and the best approach is to ask for a subdivision. They will stipulate no in- crase in density at any time. Mr. Dooley asked if there is any open space reserved. Mr. O'Brien said there is no oQev\ land except for the Conservation Zone and a GMP easement. Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission approve�thg--x-e- Mised final plat of O'Brien Brothers for the 4 lot subdivision of Foxcroft (Cardinal Woods Extension) as deipicted on a plan entitled "Cardinal Woods, Phase II• Revised Final Plat," prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn stamp .clued 9/23/95 with the following stipulations: ons of the original approval granted February .0 , 1985 and amended February 26, 1985 shall remain in ..Qffect. 2: The City Attorney shall approve legal documents pertaining • to private street maintenance waivers on each lot. These hall be recorded with the City Clerk prior to permit. 3,&_.There shall be no density increases on any lot; this shall PLANNING COMMISSION 25 NOVEMBER 1985 PAGE 2 1. An $1800 landscaping bond shall be posted rior to permit. The applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan showing the trees situated to screen the storage area for approval of the City Planner prior to permit. 2. The designated storage area is the only area approved for storage until a revised site plan approval. The fence may be installed around the perimeter of the property at the applicant's discretion. 3. Septic connections shall be located for future connection to the street. 4. The new inlet on Ethan Allen Drive shall be City standard. 5. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. Mrs. Hurd seconded the motion which passed 3-0 with Mr. Belter abstaining. 3, Public Hearing: Revised Final Plat of LTH, Inc., for revision to the approved Cluster C from 10 multi -family units to 5 duplexes on Bay Court Drive and Harbor View Road Mr. Larkin explained that his intention is to provide a buffer between the condos and the single family homes. All land would be held in common ownership and all units would front on city streets. The Wagner, Heindel & Noyes study indicates that 3044 gals. of storm water should be stored on the property by a method to be approved by the City Engineer. Members discussed the driveways to the units and felt that a T-shape set-up would allow for better access and parking. The access road is to be 18 ft. wide to the corner unit. Mr. Dooley said he would like to see 10 feet between the side of the building and the access road. Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission approve the re- vised Final Plat of LTH, Inc., for the revision to Cluster C from the approved 10 units in one structure to 5 condominium duplexes as depicted on a plan entitled "Horizontal Layout - Bartlett Property" prepared �2y Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated 6/1983 and last revised 11/13/85 with the following stipulations: 1. The access driveway to the southwest building shall be 18 feet wide. The edge of the driveway shall be no closer than 10 feet to the nearest building. 2. The drainage way in the southwest corner shall be piped and plans for this shall be approved by the City Engineer PLANNING COMMISSION 25 NOVEMBER 1985 PAGE 3 prior to permit. 3. The applicant shall meet the recommendations of Wagner, Heindel & Noyse for stormwater detention by a method approved by the City Engineer. If construction proceeds during the winter or spring months, the applicant shall follow the recommendations of Wagner, Heindel & Noyse for erosion control. 4. The plan shall show T-shaped driveways for each building, allowing two cars to park in front of a unit such that they each have unimpeded access, as approved �2y the City Planner. 5. A revised landscaping plan with street trees and site landscaping shall be approved by the City Planner prior to permit. A bond shall be posted in an amount determined by the City Planner prior to permit 6. The revised plan shall be recorded with the City Clerk within 90 days or it shall be invalid. Mrs. Hurd seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. y, Consider site plan application of Tony Cairns for Champlain Oil Co. for the construction of a 4480 sq. ft. office building and use of existing building for Champlain Oil Co., at 354 Dorset St. The existing Merrill building will serve for oil storage. Offices in front will be for the dispatcher. The new building will be for office staff. One curb cut will be closed and the drive leading to the front of the Merrill building will be closed. One of 2 existing gas pumps will probably be removed. Champlain has only 4 trucks. Mr. Belter felt there should be a way to separate Champlain's lot from Alco next door. Mr. Cairns said there is a chain link fence that could be extended. The new building will be 4800 sq. ft, initially single story but with the capability of being extended to 2 stories. Mrs. Lafleur noted that the Fire Chief says there is an underground storage tank that he would like information on. Mr. Cairns said they will request that Merrill remove all tanks over a certain number of years old. Mrs. Lafleur noted that the plan conforms to existing zoning �( and is improving the lot. However, because new plans are being considered for Dorset St. and it may be that with re- zoning, trucking and industrial warehousing will be zoned out. The Dorset St. Committee is looking at the San Remo Dr. State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist October 27, 1998 LTH Associates and Bartlett, et. al 1185 Shelburne'Road So. Burlington, VT 05401 Subject: 4CO526 - Certification of Compliance. AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division I I I West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-5656 Our office has received a construction completion report from your consultant, Kerbs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. This satisfies Condition # 5 of the above referenced permit. Thank you for your close attention to the permit conditions. Sincerely, William E. Zabiloski Assistant Regional Engineer c City of South Burlington Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. State of Vermont CASE, No. APPLICANT ADDRESS LAND USE PERMIT 4CO526 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED LTH Associates 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 AND Phyllis Hilton, Peter Bartlett, Samuel Bartlett & Frank Bartlett 23 El Carm Del Sur Monterey, California 93940 10 VSA, Chapter 151 (Act 250) and Vermont State Board of Health Regulations Chapter 5, Sanitary Engineering Subchapter.l, Public Buildings SECTION 5-651(a) (2), EXCEPTION, SITE WORK & FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION ONLY. District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 VSA, Chapter 151. This permit applies to the lands identified in Book 118, Page 275, of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington, as the subject of a deed to Phyllis Hilton, Peter Bartlett, Samuel Bartlett and Frank Bartlett of 23 E1 Carm Del Sur, Monterey, California and under option to LTH Associates, 1185 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont, the "permittees" as grantees. This permit specifically authorizes the permittees to develop 70± acres into 160 residential units C120 multi -family, 2 duplexes and 34 single-family lots on approximately 40± acres, future commercial development on 30± acres, and to construct approximately 6,000 feet of roads and utilities. This project is located off of Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The permittees, their assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. The project shall be completed as set forth in Findings of Fact and Conclu- sions of Law #4CO526, in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Approved" and on file with the District Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 2. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the permittees confirm and agree for themselves and all assigns and successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittees and all assigns and successors in interest. 3. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Certification of Compliance #4CO526, issued on September 24, 1982, by the Regional Engineer, Division of Protection, Agency of Environmental Conservation in compliance J LAND USE PERMIT #4CO526 Page 2 with Vermont State Board of Health Regulations. and (7) of said Certification are as follows: Conditions #(1), (2), (4) (1) The project must be completed as shown on the plans: Sheet Prepared by Dated Revisions 1 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 2 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 3 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 4 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 5 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 6 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 8 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 11 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 12 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 21 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. Dec., 1981 7-6-82 22 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. Dec., 1981 and which have been stamped "APPROVED" by the Division of Protection. No alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where written appli- cation has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained. (2) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (44) This project is approved to obtain potable water from the City of South Burlington's municipal water system provided the water main extension is constructed in accordance with the Department of Health's "Letter of Approval" dated July 28, 1982. (7) No construction is authorized on any of the commercial lots, duplex lots, or multi -family units until such time as the appropriate plans for the interior plumbing and ventilation have been submitted to and approved by the Division of Protection. 4., The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed in accordance with the terms of the permit. 5. The permittees shall file the highway access permit to be issued by the Vermont Agency of Transportation prior to the commencement of any construction. Any substantial changes to the project, as approved, required by the highway access permit, shall be incorporated into this permit by amendment. The LAND USE PERMIT #4CO526 Page 3 District Environmental Commission reserves the right to determine what constitutes a substantial change. 6. Prior to commencement of construction of the multi -family units, a Certification of Compliance must be issued by the Division of Protection and incorporated into this permit by amendment. 7. Prior to the commencement of construction within the 30} acre commercial area the original permittees and the purchasers or lessees of any commercial land shall file, as co-permittees, an amendment application and receive approval from the District Environmental Commission. With such an amendment application the applicants shall include cumulative impact statements under criteria 1 AIR (total number of parking spaces within the project), 1B, Waste Disposal (total number of gallons per day of sanitary wastes from the commercial area), 2 & 3, Water (total number of gallons per day of water consumption for the commercial area) and 5, traffic (total number of estimated daily trip ends or average daily traffic generated by the project). The District Commission shall evaluate amendment applications and may impose conditions with respect to commercial developments within this project area with respect to the following criteria of Act 250: 1 (air pollution), 1B(waste disposal and stormwater runoff), 1C(water con- servation), lE (streams),2 & 3 (water consumption), 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9(F), (G) and (J) . 8. The permittees and all assigns and successors in interest, shall install and maintain water -conserving plumbing fixtures in all residences, including but not limited to low -flush toilet s,low-flow showerheads, and aerator -type or flow -restricted faucets. All deeds and condominium bylaws for said units shall require the maintenance of the same. 9. All heated structures approved herein shall be constructed with double - glazed windows and with insulation with an R-Value of at least R-19 in the exterior walls, at least R-38 in the roof or cap, and at least R-10 around the perimeter of the foundation and such insulation standards shall be required in all deeds to lots approved herein. 10. The permittees and all assigns and successors in interest,including the homeowners association, shall continually maintain the landscaping sub- stantially as approved in Exhibits #7, #39 and #40, by replacing any dead or diseased plantings as soon as seasonably possible. 11. The permittees shall comply with Exhibits #7, #28-#32, #38 and #40 for erosion control. Hay bale dams and snow fence shall be installed as depicted on the plans prior to commencement of construction. All disturbed areas shall be seeded and mulched as soon as possible following disturbance but not later than October 1st of any construction season. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced, and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. LAND USE PERMIT #4C0526 Page 4 The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control, and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control, as they deem necessary. 12. The permittees shall record the transfer of ownership or control in the tract of land in the land records of the City of South Burlington prior to commencement of construction or subdivision. 13. All outdoor lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view substantially beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 14. Each prospective purchaser of any lot, dwelling unit or commercial land shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan, the Certification of Compliance, and the Land Use Permit before any written contract of sale is entered into. 15. No further subdivision of any parcels of land approved herein shall be permitted without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 16. The permittees shall supply signage plans to the District Commission for ap- proval prior to installation, and shall construct the project in accordance with those plans as approved. The Commission may request a hearing to consider said plans. 17. Clearing shall be restricted to that necessary for construction of the roadway and dwelling units. Stumps shall be disposed of above the seasonal high water table. The Commission shall be notified of the location of disposal if it is not at a state approved landfill. 18. Prior to any site work, the permittees shall install and maintain fencing along the tree line to be retained. 19. The permittees shall apply and maintain calcium chloride on all roadways with- in the project during construction and until paved to control dust. The District Environmental Commission reserves the right to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to dust control. 20. Removal of topsoil from the site is prohibited. 21. Prior to the first sale of any multi -family unit, the permittees shall submit homeowners association bylaws, which require that the association maintains, repairs and replaces, as necessary, the roadways within the multi -family residential area, the stormwater system as per the maintenance schedule, Exhibit #47, and the landscaping. The homeowners association bylaws shall be incorporated into this permit by amendment. LAND USE PERMIT #4Co526 Page 5 22. All construction on the roadway, to include utilities, lighting and landscaping, must be completed by October 1, 1983. All construction on the multi -family unit must be completed by October 1, 1984. 23. This permit shall expire on October 1, 2002, unless extended by the District Commi s s ion . 24. Notwithstanding, this permit shall expire one year from date of issuance, if the permittees have not demonstrated an intention to proceed with the project. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 12th day of October, 1982 Commissioners participating in this decision: Katherine M. Powers District #4 Coordinator Lincoln Brownell STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 4CO526 ) LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT LTH Associates and Bartlett, et. al. ) Vermont State Board of Health ADDRESS 1185 Shelburne Road ) Regulations, Chapter 5, Sanitary So. Burlington, VT 05401 ) Engineering, Subchapter 1, Public Buildings This project, consisting of an exterior sewer extension and water extension to serve a project generally described as the phased construction of 160 resid- ential units (120 multi -family, 34 single family and 6 duplex) on approximately 40 acres and commercial development on approximately 30 acres, located along a proposed 6,000 foot road with access to U.S. Route 7 in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions: (1) The project must be completed as shown on the plans: Sheet Prepared by Dated Revisions 1 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 2 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 3 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 4 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 5 Krebs .& Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 6 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 8 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. Martin, 1982 11 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 12 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inca March, 1982 7-6-82 21 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. Dec., 1981 7-6-82 22 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. Dec., 1981 and which have been stamped "APPROVED" by the Division of Protection. No alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where written application has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained. (2) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (3) The Vermont Department of Health is to be contacted in regards to any regulations and/or licenses required by their department. (They may be reached at 60 Main Street, Burlington, Vermont, or by phoning 802-862- 5701, ext. 321) (4) This project is approved to obtain potable water from the city of South Burlington's municipal water system provided the water main extension is constructed in accordance with the Department of Health's "Letter of Certificate of Ccmpli_ance 4C0526 Page 2 Approval" dated July 28, 1982. (5) A professional engineer, registered in the State"of Vermont is to strictly supervise the construction of the sewer main extension. Upon completion of construction, the supervising engineer is to submit a written certification stating all work has been completed in accordance with the stamped "APPROVED" plans. The engineers certification is to include, but not limited to, the results of all infiltration/exfiltration completed on the sewers and manholes. (6) The engineer's certification addressed in condition #5 above is to be sub- mitted to the Division of Protection prior to the occupancy of any dwelling unit or commercial property. (7) No construction is authorized on any of the commercial lots, duplex lots, or multi -family units until such time as the appropriate plans for the interior plumbing and ventilation have been submitted to and approved by the Division of Protection. . Dated this 24th day of September, 182in the Town of Essex Junction, Vermont. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer cc: P. Howard Flanders, PE Katherine Powers Fire Prevention Health Department City Planning Commission Krebs & Lansing Engineers, Inc. EPC/bmg enc. STATE OF VERP4ONT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION #4 RE: LTH Associates 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 AND Phyllis Hilton, Peter Bartlett, 23 E1 Carm Del Sur Monterey, California 93940 Application #4CO526 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 10 VSA, Chapter 151 (Act 250) Samuel Bartlett & Frank Bartlett On August 4, 1982, an application for an Act 250 permit was filed by LTH Associates of 485 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont, and Phyllis Hilton, Peter Bartlett, Samuel Bartlett and Frank Bartlett of 23 El Carm Del Sur, Monterey, California, for a project generally described as the planned development of approximately 70 acres into a phased construction of 160 residential units (120 multi -family, 6 duplex units and 34 single-family lots) on approximately 40 acres, the construction of approximately 6,000 feet of road and utilities and future commercial development of approximately 30 acres. The project is located off of Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The tract of land consists of 70+ acres with 30± acres involved in the residential project area and 40± acres involved in the commercial project area. The applicants' legal interest is ownership by the Bartletts, et. al. in fee simple and an option to purchase the land held by L.T.H. Associates. Under Act 250, projects are reviewed based on the 10 environmental criteria of 10 VSA, 66086(a) 1-10. Before granting a permit, the Board or District Commission must find that the project complies with these criteria and is not detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. Decisions must be stated in the form of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The facts we have relied upon are contained in the documents on file identified as Exhibits #1 through #57, and the evidence received at a hearing held on August 27, 1982. Parties to this application are: The applicants by John Larkin of LTH Associates; The City of South Burlington; The South Burlington Planning Commission by David Spitz, City Planner; The Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission by Arthur Hogan; and The Agency of Environmental Conservation by Dana Cole -Levesque, Land Use Administrator. FINDINGS OF FACT #4CO526 Page 2 General Discussion: These findings review the proposal to construct the road, to develop the 30- residential area and generally review future commercial development of 40± acres. The proposed road will assess both the residential and the commercial areas of the project. The applicants estimate that the future commercial area will contain a total of 144,000 square feet of gross floor space. All future commercial development will be reviewed as noted in these findings. In making the following findings, we have summarized the statutory language of the 10 criteria of 10 VSA, §6086(a): 1. There will be no undue water or air pollution: AIR POLLUTION: Residential Area: (i) The residential area of this development will contain approximately 320 parking spaces, two parking spaces for each residential unit (Exhibit #7) which the Commission finds will not result in undue air pollution (see finding iii, below). (ii) The method of heating to be utilized in the 34 residential single family residential lots will be the choice of the homeowners. Gas service will be available to the 34 single family lots (Exhibits #7 and #55). The duplexes and condominium units will be heated with gas hot water heaters (Exhibit #55, which amends Exhibit #7). The Commission finds that undue air pollution will not result from this residential heating equipment. Commercial Area: (iii) At this time specific plans have not been designed for the develop- ment of the commercial area. An indirect source permit must be obtained from the Aqency of Environmental Conservation when the total number of parking spaces on the 70± acres equals or exceeds 1,000 (Exhibit #7). The Commission will require that, prior to any development (beyond road construction) within the 40± acre commercial area, this applicant and the purchaser or lessee of any land or lot file an amendment application as co-permittees and receive approval for the proposed development. The Commission will require that each permit amendment application include a cumulative impact summary, which states the total number of parking spaces located/to be located within the 70- acre parcel. C FINDINGS OF FACT #4C0526 Page 3 (iv) Additionally, the Commission will require that each amendment application for any development within the 40t acre commercial area be reviewed under this subcriteria with respect to any air pollution resulting from the use of any facility, to include process emission and heating equipment. WATER POLLUTION (A) Headwaters: (i) The Commission finds that this 70± acres is not in a headwaters area (Exhibit #7) . (B) Waste Disposal: Sanitary: (i) The applicants estimate that the residential portion of the project will generate approximately 33,000 gallons per day and the commercial portion of the project will generate approximately 10,000 gallons of sanitary wastes (Exhibit #7). (iii) A Certification of Compliance approving the exterior sewer extension and water extension to service this project has been issued by the Division of Protection. This certification prohibits construction in the 40f acre commercial area, of the duplexes, and of the condominiums until detailed plans have been submitted to and approved by the Division (Exhibit #56). The Commission accepts this Certification as evidence that the disposal of wastes into the municipal system meets applicable State Health regulations and will not cause undue water pollution, (iv) The Commission will require that each amendment application for any development within the 40± acre commercial area be reviewed under this subcriterion and must include a cumulative impact summary, which states the total number of gallons per day of sanitary wastes generated from the 40± acre commercial area. Stormwater: (i) Stormwater runoff from the multi -family residential area will be collected and treated in catch basins designed to remove floatable and settleable solids. The first 1/2 of this stormwater will be directed into stormwater filters and discharged into existing swales. The roadway and the single- family residential section will be serviced by similar catch - basins, which will direct the stormwater runoff into a system which will become the property of the City of South Burlington (Exhibits #7, #28 through 36, #38, #37, #42, #43 and #45 through #47). FINDINGS OF FACT #4CO526 Page 4 (ii) As a result of the road and residential construction, stormwater peak flows for a 50 year storm are expected to increase by 7.4%. Many drainage easements have been dedicated to the City of South Burlington (Exhibit #71. (iii) The applicants have provided a maintenance schedule for the multi- family residential area stormwater water system (Exhibit #47) which the Commission will require to be incorporated into the homeowner association bylaws. The Commission will require that the permittee maintain repair and replace the roadway stormwater system until such time as it becomes the property of the City of South Burlington. (iv) A Temporary Pollution Permit has been issued for the roadway and the multi -family residential area which the Commission accepts as evidence that these areas of the project comply with applicable Water Resources Department regulations (Exhibit #53). (v) The Commission will require that each amendment application for any development within the 40t acre commercial area be reviewed under this subcriterion. (C) Water Conservation: (i) The applicants will include,in all deeds to the residential lots and in the condominium bylaws,sections which require the installation and maintenance of water -saving plumbing fixtures (Exhibit #7). (ii) The Commission will require that each amendment application for any development within the 40± acre commercial area be reviewed under this subcriterion. (D) Floodways: (i) The Commission finds that this 70± acre parcel is not located within any floodway. (E) Streams: (i) An intermittent stream crosses the 40± acre commercial area of this project as detailed on Exhibit #27. The roadway will cross this stream (Exhibit #28) and will be constructed with a culvert and rip -rapped inlet and discharge as depicted on Exhibits #33 and #34. FINDINGS OF FACT #4CO526 Page 5 (ii) This intermittent stream will be buffered by a conservation located 50 feet on either side of the stream. No development beyond the 15 foot pedestrian easement (trail) will be permitted within this zone (Exhibit #7 and #27). (iii) The Commission will require that each amendment application for any development within the 40± acre commercial area be reviewed under this subcriterion for conformance to the conservation zone. (iv) The Commission finds that the development, as proposed, will maintain the natural condition of the stream to the fullest extent reasonable and will not endanger the health, safety or welfare of the public or of adjoining landowners. (F) Shorelines: (i) The Commission finds that this subcriterion does not apply to the development of this 70f acre parcel. 2 and 3. There is sufficient water available and no existing water supply will be unreasonably burdened: (i) The project will be served by the City of South Burlington Water System from two separate non -looped systems and involves the installation of a water line extension (Exhibit #7). (ii) The Department of Health has approved the water line extension (Exhibit #52) and a Certification of Compliance approving exteric waterline construction has been issued by the Division of Protection. (iii) The applicants estimate that the water demand of the 30± acre residential portion of the project will be 33,000 gallons per day (Exhibit #7) (iv) The City of South Burlington Water Department has approved, with conditions, the proposed water systems (Exhibit #12) and the Champlain Water District has stated that the estimated peak water demand of 180-200 gallons per minute and estimated consumption of 33,000 gallons per day can be supplied to the residential portion of this development (Exhibit #13), which the Commission accepts as evidence that there is sufficient water available and the residential portion of the project will not restrict nor encumber present users. FINDINGS OF FACT #4CO526 Page 6 M 5. (v) The Commission will require that each amendment application for any development within the 40± acre commercial area be reviewed under these criteria and include a cumulative impact summary which states the total gallons per day of water demand within the 40± acre commercial area. There will be no undue soil erosion or effects on the capacity of the land to hold water: (i) The soil types found in the 70± acre parcel are varied and are mapped on Exhibit #39. The applicants have stated that the droughtier soils are susceptible to erosion. (ii) The applicants have submitted detail erosion control plans for the construction of the road and the multi -family units. Temporary erosion controls include hay bales in swales and around catch basins, snow fence and siltfence as noted on Exhibits #7, #28-#32, #38 and #46. The applicants' Erosion Control and Construction Sequence reserves the right to require the installation of additional erosion control measures (Exhibit #38). (iii) Permanent erosion controls consist of seeding and mulching, landscaping and rip -rapping (Exhibits #7, #28-#32, #38 and #40). (iv) Due to the erodable nature of some of the soils on the 70± acre parcel (Exhibit #7) the Commission will reserve the right to require addi- tional erosion control measures and will require that hay bale check dams be placed, as noted, the swales and snowfence be installed prior to the commencement of construction. (v) The Commission will require that each amendment application for any further development on the 70± acre parcel be reviewed under this criterion and submit erosion control plans which address the erodable nature of some of the soil types found on the 70± acre parcel. This project will not cause unreasonable safety or congestion conditions with respect to highways or other means of transportation: (i) The 70± acre parcel, both residential and commercial areas, will be accessed from Shelburne Road, Vermont Route 7. Two additional access points will be provided from the easterly section of the development onto a roadway located in the Meadowood at Spear development. In turn, the Meadowood at Spear roadway accesses onto Spear Street (Exhibit #7 and #27). FINDINGS OF FACT #4CO526 Page 7 (H) The applicantsestimate that the residential portion of this development will generate approximately 1,000 trip ends per day. The project has been designed to minimize future through commercial traffic while allowing residential traffic to utilize Spear Street (Exhibit #71. (iii) The City of South Burlington Planning Commission has limited residential development to 50 residential units or 15 commercial acres, or such combination, if the project is accessed only by Shelburne Road. In the event the project is accessed by Meadowood at Spear only nine residential units may be constructed (Exhibit #21) . (iv) The applicants have submitted a traffic report, which analyzes the potential impact of the traffic generated by this project on Route 7. The applicantshave defined the project as 120 residential units and an estimated 144,000 square feet of gross commercial floor space (Exhibit #49) . (v) This project will require a highway access permit from the Vermont Agency of Transportation. The agency has reviewed the applicants' traffic report and found that more detailed information will be required before a highway access permit can be issued (Exhibit #54). (vi) The Commission will require that the applicantsfile the highway access permit with the Commission prior to commencement of con- struction. Any changes to the project, as approved, required by the highway access permit, shall be approved by the Commission. (vii) Additionally, the Commission will require that each amendment appli- cation for any development within the 40t acre commercial area be reviewed under this criterion and must include a cumulative impact summary which states the total number of estimated trip ends per day generated from this project. 6-7. There will be no unreasonable burdens on educational or other municipal services: EDTIrATION : M The South Burlington Schools Directors have stated that the residential section of this project will not place an unreasonable burden on the municipality to provide educational services (Exhibit #16) . FINDINGS OF FACT #4CO526 Page 8 MUNICIPAL SERVICES: M The South Burlington Fire Chief has reviewed the residential plans and stated that his department can provide fire services (Exhibit #17). (ii) The South Burlington Police Chief has reviewed the residential plans and found them satisfactory (Exhibit 4f18). (iii) The South Burlington City Manager has stated that the Bartletts Bay sewage treatment plant has sufficient reserve capacity to service the estimated residential and commercial areas of this project (Exhibit #8). (iv) The South Burlington Water Department has approved the water service plans for residential section of this project with condit (Exhibit #12) . (v) The Commission will require that each amendment application for any development on the 30± acre commercial area be reviewed under this criterion in regards to fire, police, water (and sewer as noted in 1(B), above). 8. There will be no undue adverse effects on aesthetics, scenic beauty, historic sites or natural areas: (i) The Commission finds that historic sites, necessary wildlife habitat and rare and irreplaceable natural areas will not be affected by this project. (ii) The multi -family units will be landscaped as outlined on Exhibit #40. Shade trees will be planted at 60' intervals along the single family roadway (Exhibit #7 and #39). The applicants have agreed to continually maintain the landscaping as approved. The Commission will require that the Protective Covenants condition the continued maintenance of the landscaping. (iii) Exterior lighting for the multi -family units will consist of cut-off luminaires and will be installed as depicted on Exhibit #41. Street lighting will consist of the Green Mountain Power Company fixtures utilized by the City of South Burlington. (iv) The exterior of the multi -family buildings will be similar to that depicted on Exhibit #40 and will be constructed of earthtoned wood clapboard siding with asphalt shingles. (v) No permanent signs are planned at this time (Exhibit #7). (vi) Power will be supplied underground (testimony of Robert Krebs). FINDINGS OF FACT #4C0526 Page 9 (vii) Trash containers will be located as depicted on Exhibit #39, fully enclosed on the ends of the garages. (viii) The present site is generally sloping and partially wooded with excellent views of Lake Champlain and the Adirondack Mountains. The development will not interfere with views from Spear Street (Exhibit #7). (.ix) A snow fence will be installed during construction to prevent root damage to the pine and hardwood and has to be retained (Exhibit #7). (x) The Commission will require that each amendment application for any development on the 30+ acre commercial area be reviewed under this criterion. 9. The project is in conformance with the Capability and Development Plan: (i) The Commission finds that subcriteria 9(H) and 9(L) are not applicable to this project. (A) Impact of growth: (i) The City of South Burlington has identified no undue burdens on any facilities or services. (B/C) Primary and secondary agricultural soils and forest soils: (i) The parcel consists of 70± acres. Approximately 40± of these acres can be classified as primary agriculture soils (Exhibit #7). (ii) The applicants havemapped the soils found on this parcel on Exhibit #44. The agricultural soils found on this parcel vary in type, are scattered throughout the parcel and are separated by two streams, are varied topography (high elevation: 330, low elevation: 154). The applicants have stated that such factors make the parcel difficult to farm (Exhibit #7). The County Extension Agency for Agriculture has stated that this parcel cannot support an economic farming operation (Exhibit #50). (iii) The applicants do not own or control any non-agricultural soils that would be reasonably suitable for this development (Exhibit #7) (iv) The Commission finds that the density of development on this parcel is appropriate to this highly developed area of South Burlinqton and that the applicantshave minimized the reduction of the varied and scattered agricultural soils by providing open space for individual gardens. FINDINGS OF FACT #4CO526 Page 10 (v) The land to the south of this parcel is farmed by Mr. Irish, who has stated that the proposed development will not interfere with or jeopardize the continuation of this family farm operation (Exhibit #24) . (D/E) Earth Resources: (i) The 70± acre parcel contains some Adams soils, which is a loamy sand (Exhibit #7 and #44). (ii) Due to the small area and its accessibility, the Commission finds that this parcel does not contain a high pctential for extraction of earth or mineral resources. (F) Energy Conservation: (i) The residential units will be constructed with insulation R factors of at least R-38 in the ceilings, R-19 in the walls and R-10 at the slab or foundations. The single-family units have available southerly exposures and the multi -family units have been orientated to southern exposures (Exhibit #7). (ii) The Commission will require that insulation standards are included in all deeds to the units or lots. (iii) All of the residential units will be heated with gas fired hot water heating systems (Exhibit #55). (iv) The Commission will require that each amendment application for any further development on the 70± acre parcel be reviewed under this subcriterion. (G) Private Utilities: (i) The Commission will require that the applicants maintain, repair and replace, as necessary, those utilities, to include the roadway, the roadway stormwater system, the street lighting and the street landscaping until they are accepted by the City. (ii) The homeowners association shall maintain, repair and replace, as necessary, the multi -family stormwater system, roadways and landscaping. The stormwater system shall be maintained as outlined in the stormwater maintenance system (Exhibit #7 and #47) . (J) Public Services: (i) The Commission accepts the letter from Green Mountain Power Corporation as evidence that it can provide utility service to the project (Exhibit #57). FINDINGS OF FACT #4C0526 Page 11 (K) Public or Quasi -Public Investments: (i) There is a public investment in the roads serving the project and in the South Burlington Green Belt area to the north of the project. The applicants will dedicate the roadways and a 1.68 acre park to the City. The applicants will dedicate pedestrian walkways within the conservation zone to the City (Exhibit #7). (ii) The Commission finds that this project, as proposed, will not jeopardize the function and/or public's use, enjoyment or access to these lands. 10. The project is in conformance with the local or regional plan: (i) The South Burlington Planning Commission has indicated that the project conforms to the local plan (Exhibit #25). CONCLUSION OF LAW Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, it is the conclusion of this District Environmental Commission that the project described in the application referred to above, if completed and maintained in conformance with all of the terms and conditions of that application, and of Land Use Permit #4C0526, will not cause or result in a detriment to public health, safety or general welfare under the criteria described in 10 VSA, §6086(a) and that, pursuant to such section, a permit is therefore issued. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 12th day of October, 1982. Commissioners participating in this decision: Ic Katherine M. Powers, District #4 Coordinator Lincoln Brownell ' CITY Or SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1) Name "of Applicant LM-Aaaocj-atees 1185 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington 2) Name of Subdivision Bartlett Property 3) Describe Subdivision (i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, include gross floor area if cor,=- erc i a 1.) Total acre 70:22 acres - 39.92 acres Residential (R4) , _ 30.30 acres Comunercial (C2). Project is for 120 clustered housing and 38 house lots (2 of which are for Duplexes). Nothing specific is planned at this time for commercial land. 4) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record,applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: None S. Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer !Robert C . Krebs, Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Inc. Shelburne Road Phone; (802) 985-2827 _ Shelburne. VT _05482 b . Surveyor Robert C . Krebs, Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineering Inc. Shelburne Road Phone_(802)985-2827 Shelburne, VT 05482 C. Attorney _ James Farrell 275 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone: (802)863-2823 d. Plat Designer Robert C. Krebs, address above -2- 6) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since this proposal was last before the Commission: Road moved to north at main entrance. 7) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all cont- igous properties: See attached sheet _ 8) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer(s) of the preliminary map(O'ac�o,nganying this appli- cation: Preliminary Plat Bartlett Property Details _ Bartlett'Property 9) Attach a preliminary map showing the following information: 1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the city. 21 Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. 3) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision,, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. 4) The names of all subdivisions im-iediately adjacent and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. 5) The location and size of any existing sewers and tinter mains, culverts and rains on the property or serving the property to be subdivided. 6) Location, names and widths of existing, and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks -3- 1 10) and other public or privately maintained open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. 7) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of'proposed finished grades where change of existing ground elevation will be five feet or more. 8) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. 9) Numerical and graphic scale, Cate and true north arrow. 10) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative roans of providing water supply to the proposed subdivision. 11) Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provision for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 12) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed� location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface Taoil, rock and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results of percolation tests. 13) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. 14) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culverts which may be required. 15) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic lay- out in the field. Unless an existing street intersection is shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. 16) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. Developmental timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates) Start: Summer 1982 Completion: two to three 'Years 11) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: None -4- 12) Attach a'vicinity map showing the following: 1) All existing subdivisions, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the record owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street ad- joining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existingIfiled or proposed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the sub - divider's entire holding. (signature) applicant o contact person Oa Le - I BARTLETT PROPERTY - ABUTTING LAND OWNERS Benes Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . Eric & Mary Farrell . . . . . . . . . . . First Burlington Realty Inc. . . . . . . The Concord Investment Group (Goetz). . . Sixteen Ninety Shelburne Road (Baffa) . . Bernice S. Irish . . . . . . . . . . . . James & Madeline Chaplin . . . . . . . . Jack & Ruth Trevithick . . . . . . . . . Roland & Priscilla Bishop . . . . . . . . Marsillo Marsilli . . . . . . . . . . . . Verno & Joan Balser . . . . . . . . . . . John Wyckoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Daniel & Joan Fleming . . . . . . . . . . Howard & Rosemary Perkett . . . . . . . . Robert & Eileen Collins . . . . . . . . . Thomas & Joan Kieran . . . . . . . . . . John & Margaret McDonough . . . . . . . . Robert & Barbara McMahan . . . . . . . . Green Mountain Power Real Estate Corp.. . City of South Burlington . . . . . . . . Kurt Reichett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1710 Shelburne Road, South Burlington 177 South Winooski Ave., Burlington Box 411, Burlington 80 Allen Road, South Burlington 100 Allen Road, South Burlington 200 Allen Road, South Burlington 1741 Spear Street, South Burlington 17SI Spear Street, South Burlington 10 Pheasant Way, South Burlington 16 Quail Run, South Burlington 14 Quail Run, South Burlington 12 Quail Run, South Burlington 11 Quail Run, South Burlington 10 Quail Run, South Burlington Indian Mill Road, Pound Ridge, NY io`/S� 6 Quail Run, South Burlington 4 Quail Run, South Burlington 2 Quail Run, South Burlington 1 Main Street, Burlington City Hall, South Burlington Pine Haven Shores, Shelburne PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 March 14, 1994 David H. Greenberg, Esquire P.O. Box 201 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Bishop Property, 9 Bay Crest Drive Dear Mr. Greenberg: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is in response to your letter to Richard Ward dated March 11, 1994 relative to the above matter. I first learned of this situation in May, 1993 when the City was notified that an application was under review by the State for the boundary line adjustment. I then notified your clients and the owners of 11 Bay Crest Drive, William and Nancy Jacobus (see enclosed). It is the City's position that this boundary line adjustment must be approved by the Planning Commission. The plan showing the boundary line adjustment recorded in Volume 166, page 49 was never approved by the Planning Commission. Approval is required because a boundary line adjustment within an approved subdivision is a resubdivision and a resubdivision requires approval of the Planning Commission. Therefore, approval must be obtained from the Planning Commission for the boundary line adjustment or the lots returned to their original size as shown on the plat recorded in Volume 173, page 99 of the land records. Please let me know which option your clients will choose to resolve this matter. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since ly, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant 1 Encl RJB/mcp cc: Richard Ward DAVID H. GREENBERG ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 201 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0201 TELEPHONE (802) 862-8165 March 11, 1994 Attention Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Christopher D. and Janet J. Bishop 9 Bay Crest Drive, South Burlington Dear Dick: RICHARDSON PLACE SUITE 3G CHURCH STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT As you know from our previous discussion, I represent Christopher D. Bishop and Janet J. Bishop who reside at 9 Bay Crest Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. The Bishop residence was constructed on Lot #29 of the Bartlett property. That lot is shown on a plan dated March 1982 and recorded in Plat Book 173, Page 99 of the South Burlington Records. Lot 28 and Lot 29 were conveyed to Ireland Industries, Inc. on February 7, 1985 (Volume 211, Page 213) which developed the lots. Originally, Lot 29 was shown to have a boundary line on Bay Crest Drive of 100 feet and to contain 16,483 square feet. However, on August 22, 1985, the developer filed a new plat of Lots 28 and 29 in which that boundary line was reduced to 95 feet and the square footage reduced to 16,453 (Volume 166, Page 49). My clients purchased their home on April 23, 1993 from Judith Ring and William and Nancy Jacobus, the previous owners. Since there was no subdivision permit obtained from the State for the changes made by Ireland Industries, Inc., I insisted that the sellers obtain a permit to show that the boundary lines of the lots previously approved by the State in Land Use Permit No. 4CO526 (Volume 186, Page 55) had been changed. On May 18, 1993, the State issued Subdivision Permit #EC-4-1734 which has been recorded in the land records. That permit approved the boundary changes to Lots 28 and 29 (see enclosed copy). It appears that my clients' property is in compliance with all zoning and planning requirements. I am requesting that your office confirm that Lot 29 is now in compliance with town regulations so that I can certify title and release funds which I have been holding in escrow. Mr. Richard Ward March 11, 1994 Page 2 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very mkWIa ours, David H. Gree DHG/meb Enclosures TF #511 Mate of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Departnlepi orggki �ronr�t tConservation Essex Jct., VT 05452 Phone #(802)879-6563 May 18, 1993 Robert & Judith Ring and William & Nancy Jacobus 9 Bay Crest Drive and 11 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: EC-4-1734 Dear Applicants: Please take the documents stamped "Documents For Recording" (Subdivision Permit Number EC-4-1734 and Notice of Permit Recording) to the appropriate Town Clerk. As outlined on the Notice, this Permit and Notice must be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance and prior- to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. You are responsible for the recording fees. Please ask the town clerk to return the attached self-addressed, stamped postcard to this office to verify recording. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please call me at the above number. Sincerely, Enclosures Ernestine Chevrier District Office Clerk Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jet./Pittsford/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury DOCUMENTS for RECORDING STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF PROTECTION 18 V.S.A.-1218-1220 TO: Municipal/City Clerk, RE: SUBDIVISION PERMIT City of South Burlington EC-4-1734 NOTICE OF PERMIT RECORDING As Municipal Clerk for the Town/City noted above, in Vermont, you are hereby notified that this Notice of Permit Recording and the above mentioned Permit are to be recorded in the Municipal Land Records under the authority of 27 V.S.A. -603- 605. The grantor(s) shall be Robert & Judith Ring and William & Nancy Jacobus whose lands are identified in Book 288 and 213, Page 252 and 262; and the grantee shall be the State of Vermont, Agency of Natural Resources. The grantor(s) and the grantee shall be listed in the index in the Claimant's Book and in the general index for deeds. The grantee's interest is limited to the lands of the grantor(s) identified in the Book(s) and Page(s) specified above(and the proposed improvements) as issued under the authority of 18 V.S.A.-1218-1220 and the Environmental Protection Rules. I swear that, to the best of my information and belief, the statements above are true. 1993. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 18th day of May, 1 Arnstine C h e v r i e r District Office Clerk DOCUMENTS. for Ll State of Vermont RECORDING SUBDIVISION PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED_ CASE NO. EC-4-1734 Environmental Protection Rules APPLICANT Robert & Judith Ring Effective September 10, 1982 ADDRESS 9 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 and William & Nancy Jacobus 11 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of amending boundary lines of previously approved lots #28 and #29 (4CO526) served by municipal water and sewer services located off Bay Crest Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This Permit: does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4CO526 and amendments. GENERAL (1) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans "Plat of Survey of . Lot No. 28 & Lot no. 29 Bartlett Property South Burlington, Vermont" dated Aug 21, 1985 drawn by Giroux Drafting Serv. revised by Henry J. Swider, L.S. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (2) Each prospective purchaser of each lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. (3) This project has been reviewed and is approved for the existing single family residence on Lots 28 and 29. Construction of other type dwellings, including public buildings, duplexes, and condominium units, is not allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. I Subdivision Permit EC-4-1734, Ring & Jacobus Page 2 DOCUMENTS for RECORDING (4) The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the City of South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. (5) All conditions set forth in Certification of Compliance #k4C0526 dated September 24, 1982 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 18th day of May, 1993. Jack Long, Acting Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation BY )eLssanne Wym Assistant Regional Engineer CC: For The Record City of South Burlington Act 250 Coordinator -Louis Borie Henry Swider, L.S. LOT Qlz 21 1J 1_8' 02' 23' W 84.45' S LOT Q!2 ZS LOT We Zl GI- 14,45Z SQ. FT. �If N1- 2 Ir LOT Qs 22 N18` 02' Z3*w 9 8.89' LOT de 29 Ir,,,483 SQ.FL S� " U 7 O _ Cl LOT QS 30 "APPROVED" o Department " of Environmental Conservation oved Sy • P' :EG'14— I I'�` ATE: P5I1�I(13 C,),U, �.0S' 95.00' SI6'01'5VE (BAY Cee'ST a=•) D �. BAY. COUET LERK'S OFFICE - . 195E • c moo' e ow) d at L132 o'clock -,carded in Vol. _12/— of en page lk% °� >k Clerk O IS 30 GO 90 120 ISO G26,PW1C SC4LE LEGEUD O I200 PIPE ---- PZOPEeT`/ LIVE --- CEQTEQ LIUE ►DOTES THE DATA CQ THIS PLA1.I WAS COMPILED F20M A 5UrZV E`/ MAP EQT17LED ' RUAL PLAT, BAQ T LETT P20PERTY" ,DATED MAECH 1982 , AQD 1.1LIM13EEED 81139 51 keEBS OIJD LAL1SIQG, C005ULTIOG EIIG)L =-E.Z5 OF W11.10oseI , VT. TWE SUIRVE`1 WAS BF -EA ZEVISE.D WITI-4 T141S PLA►J 34 k:LQ24 J.SWIDE2,L.S. OIJ 4J6. 21,1955. TWiS SUeVEY02 ASSU"S !Jo 2ESP0WSIF3ILIT`y FO{Z -rkE &CCUtZ4.Cl/ OF TWE OZIGIIJ,AL VEEB54 LA1.ISIIJG SU2VEl/. PLOT OF SU2VE`/ OF: LOT WLI ZE 4 LOT We 29 BAF- LLYT PPOPEF-TY SOUTH BUV-LIIJGTOIJ, VEEMOIJT PLAT FOP- IZELA,QD ILIDUSTelE5 BUeLttJGTO1J , VE2MOUT SCALE: I' - 30' DATE: AUG.21, 1955 5U2VE'l ZEVISED 3y= HEQP-`/ J. 5VJIDEe,L.S. s`P�pE Y /E�S�SEu -�C7 , VIE�JZI.. OUT 1, HENRY / T Lam% �f ''fit�G�/�✓.# ) swieER ho. 176 D�l�W tJ 3Y = �� �sFc �E��ooQ3c GIZOUsC DeAFTIJG SEIZV. �SUR City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 May 19, 1993 658-7958 William & Nancy Jacobus 11 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Boundary Line Adjustment, Lot #28 & 29 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Jacobus: This letter is in regards to the boundary line adjustment between your property and 9 Bay Crest Drive. An application is currently under review by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation to amend your boundary line and an application will also be required for approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission. Therefore, you and your neighbor, Christopher and Janet Bishop, will have to file a joint sketch plan application (see enclosed) and submit five (5) copies plus one (1) reduced copy (llxl7) of a sketch showing your two (2) properties to the Planning Commission. Your application will then be scheduled for review by the Planning Commission. After the sketch plan review, you will be required to submit a Revised Final Plat application and five (5) copies of the survey plat plus one (1) reduced copy (llxl7). Your plat will be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing and a decision rendered. If the plan is approved, you will be required to file the approved plat with the City Clerk with a written endorsement by the Planning Commission. I realize that this process may appear to be complex, but it is really quite simple. I will help you as much as I can to make the process go as easily as possible. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to begin the application process. Sinc ely, i� Ra mo d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp cc: Robin Beane City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 May 19, 1993 658-7958 i Christopher & Janet Bishop 9 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Boundary Line Adjustment, Lot #28 & 29 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Bishop: This letter is in regards to the boundary line adjustment between your property and 11 Bay Crest Drive. An application is currently under review by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation to amend your boundary line and an application will also be required for approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission. Therefore, you and your neighbor, William and Nancy Jacobus, will have to file a joint sketch plan application (see enclosed) and submit five (5) copies plus one (1) reduced copy (llxl7) of a sketch showing your two (2) properties to the Planning Commission. Your application will then be scheduled for review by the Planning Commission. After the sketch plan review, you will be required to submit a Revised Final Plat application and five (5) copies of the survey plat plus one (1) reduced copy (llxl7). Your plat will be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing and a decision rendered. If the plan is approved, you will be required to file the approved plat with the City Clerk with a written endorsement by the Planning Commission. I realize that this process may appear to be complex, but it is really quite simple. I will help you as much as I can to make the process go as easily as possible. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to begin the application process. Sinc rely, /P Raymt J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp cc: Robin Beane L L, I I L -1) ff C6 x 153�� �y�� D,* Jvv� 41fl, ZIW�� Memorandum - Planning May 11, 1993 agenda items May 7, 1993 Page 5 the north side of building B. The exact location of the easement is to be determined at a later date. Sewer: The applicant estimates a total sewage allocation needed of 32,255 gpd. This is a 5620 gpd increase over the estimate given at sketch plan. This increase is due to converting building H from retail to a 200 seat restaurant. Thre is only 31,000 gpd of available capacity. This issue needs to be discussed. Traffic: The use of J iW `y� & Ies will be limited —the same off-peak traffic maximum of 250 seats. The use of the ballroom for the continental breakfast will not affect traffic since this will be limited to in-house guests. Enclosed is a revised traffic impact analysis dated 4/16/93 prepared by Lamoureux & Stone. The analysis was revised to include shorter future cycle lengths, effects of right turns on red, and as recommended by VAOT, a higher saturation flow rate. The consultant also evaluated the project's impact on the intersections south of Fayette Road. The report is divided into two segments: North Segment (ie, north of Fayette Road) and South Segment (ie, Holmes, Green Mountain, and Allen). Also enclosed are comments from CCRPC and VAOT regarding the first traffic impact study. CCRPC and VAOT have not yet reviewed the revised analysis. North Segment: The analysis indicates that all intersections north of Fayette Road will operate at an acceptable LOS for both Phase I and full -build. The overall intersection LOS will not fall below "D" for any intersection. The individual LOS for each critical movement (i.e., north and south thru movement) will not fall below LOS "D". No movements will fall below LOS "E". South Segment: The consultant conducted two analyses for the intersections in this segment. The first is an LOS analysis of the project's impact assuming an improved Shelburne Road (ie, the plans currently being developed by VAOT). The second is an analysis of the project's impact assuming only "short term" improvements at the Green Mountain Drive and Allen Road intersections. The first analysis indicates that the Holmes Road, Green Mountain Drive, and Allen Road intersections will operate at LOS "C" at full -build once Shelburne Road is improved. The analysis of "short term" improvements indicates that the Green Mountain Drive and Allen Road intersections currently operate at 5 -,. Mate of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Robert & Judith RING 9 Bay Crest Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Essex Jct.,Vermont 05452 Telephone # 879-6563 May 7, 1993 RE: EC-4-1734 ; amend bounday lines of Lots 28 & 29 mun. water & sewer sfr located Bay Crest Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the referenced permit on 05/06/93, including a fee of $50 paid for by Check Number 1397. This application falls under the Multi -Lot Subdivision Program Area, and under the Performance Standards for this program area, we have 45 days of 'in- house' time for our review of your application. If we need further information from you in order to reach a decision on your application, the time we wait for your submittal of that information does not count against the allowable in-house time specified in the performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 days in-house, please contact this office at 879-6563. Please note that this does not constitute receipt of your application under the requirements of Act 250. If you have questions relating to Act 250 jurisdiction, a District Coordinator may be reached at 879-6563. Fb the Division of Protection, Administrative Secretary cc: Henry Swider South Burlington Planning Commission Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury 1 4, d //�l y State of Vermont A ^ SUBDIVISION PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. EC-4-1734 Environmental Protection Rules APPLICANT Robert & Judith Ring Effective September 10, 1982 ADDRESS 9 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 and William & Nancy Jacobus 11 Bay Crest Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of amending boundary lines of previously approved lots #28 and #29 (4CO526) served by municipal water and sewer services located off Bay Crest Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4CO526 and amendments. GENERAL (1) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans "Plat of Survey of . Lot No. 28 & Lot no. 29 Bartlett Property South Burlington, Vermont" dated Aug 21, 1985 drawn by Giroux Drafting 5erv. revised by Henry J. Swider, L.S. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (2) Each prospective purchaser of each lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. (3) This project has been reviewed and is approved for the existing single family residence on Lots 28 and 29. Construction of other type dwellings, includinq public buildings, duplexes, and condominium units, is not allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. Subdivision Permit EC-4-1734, Ring & Jacobus Page 2 DOCUMENTS. for RECORDING (4) The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the City of South Burlington Land Records within 38 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. (5) All conditions set forth in Certification of Compliance #4C0526 dated September 24, 1982 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 18th day of May, 1993. Jack Long, Acting Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation B y Q 4A 0 (,1J w I _ essanne Wym Assl st. nt Regional E,^.ginc'cr CC: For The Record City of South Burlington Act 250 Coordinator -Louis Borie Henry Swider, L.S. BER/ -ONE PARADISE FITZPATRICK &I TITH ✓ 1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 34 PEARL STREET P.O. BOX 174 JOHN J. BERGERON ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05453 BURLINGTON OFFICE VINCENT A. PARAWS 27 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 925 EDWARD D. FITZPATRICK (802) 879-8304 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 NORMAN C. SMITH FAX (802) 879.65M (802) 863-1191 PRISCILLA BONDY DUBS FAX (802) 863-5798 DOUGLAS O. KALLEN DANIEL P. O'ROURKE REPLY TO ESSEX JUNCTION OFFICE August 26, 1993 William H. Nedde, III Krebs & Lansing 10 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 k. RE: Bishop Property - Bartlett Subdivision South Burlington, VT Dear Mr. Nedde: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of the Warranty Deed which was recorded in April of this year which conveyed Lot 29 to Christopher D. & Janet J. Bishop. Also enclosed is a copy of the mortgage deed I copied from the South Burlington Land Records which describes Lot 28 owned by William N. & Nancy H. Jacobus. I am also enclosing a copy of Subdivision Permit #EC-4-1734 and approved survey which we obtained this past May. I may have previously sent this document to you, but I couldn't verify that from my file. If you need any further information, please don't hesitate to contact me. I will be glad to do whatever additional research is necessary in the South Burlington Land Records. I look forward to receiving the site plan from you towards the end of next week. Very truly yours, Robin Beane Enclosures elTIIll .�11 �hrll h4l 1 we, WILLIAM F. CROW and MARTHA M. CROW f�f f Of South Burlington in the County o)' Chittenden and State of Vermont Grantors , in the consideration of ------------------------------------TEN and more ---------------------------- Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by WILLIAM N. JACOBUS and NANCY H. JACOBUS of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont Grantees , by these presents, do freely Qiior. Brant. Srll. Qlondry Anb Qlanfirm unto the said Grantes WILLIAM N. JACOBUS and NANCY H. JACOBUS, husband and wife as tenants by the entirety and their heirs and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in the City of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Yermont, described as follows, viz: Being all and the same land and premises conveyed to William F. Crow and Martha M. Crow by Warranty Deed of Ireland Industries, Inc., dated June 17, 1986-and recorded June 19, 1986 in Volume 216 at Page 316 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington, and being more particularly described therein as follows: A parcel of land with dwelling house thereon located on the north side of Bay Crest Drive, with a frontage and south line on Bay Crest Drive of 90.05 feet, a west line of 165.14 feet, a north line of 84.43 feet, and an east line of 168.88 feet. Said lot contains 14,432 square feet and is all of Lot No. 28 as shown on a plan entitled "Plat of Survey of Lots 28 and 29 of Bartlett Property" dated August 21, 1985 and of record in Plat Book 166 on page 49 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington. Included in this conveyance in common with others is a right of egress and ingress over the proposed roads shown on said Plan until such roads are accepted as public highways by the City of South Burlington. Said land and premises are subject to certain protective covenants dated March 2, 1984, of record in Volume 201 at pages 155-158 of the Miscellaneous Land Records of the City of South Ru—lington. Said land and premises are subject to a reservation by LTH Associates and its successors and assigns of a right-of-way over lot 28 to the northerly 20 feet of said lot and an easement to the northerly 20 feet of said lot for the purpose of installation, repair and replacement and grading of a drainage system located thereon for the benefit of lots 20-33, which right-of-way and easement shall cease upon conveyance of the last of these fourteen lots. Being all and the same land and premises conveyed to Ireland Industries, Inc. by warranty deed of LTH Associates dated February 7, 1985 and recorded in Volume 211, Page 211 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made in and to said deed and deeds and the references therein in further aid of this description. Verna* Property Transfer Tax 32 V. & Il Chap. 231 .ACKNOWLEDGEMM- KnMX=-VARW-=W0FN[WNCGMWM VtLMM"" erryesacasNM Rahn No. wawa. C� Date 1rt�. �7 �-D7 U'6 To liaur anb to lioib said granted premises, with all the privileges and ap- purtenances thereof, to the said Grantees, WILLIAM N. JACOBUS and NANCY H. JACOBUS, husband and wife as tenants by the entirety, their heirs and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; .Ind we the said G'rantor_s, .,4jILLI�1'1 F. CROW and MARTHA M. CROW for ourselves and our heirs, executors and ad�ministrators, 'do covenant with the said Grantees, WILLIAM N. JACOBUS and_ NgPiCY H. JACOBUS, their heirs and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents we are the sole owner a of the premises, and have flood ri-dht and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are Irre Xrom Eurrq Enrumhramr. except as stated; and we hereby engage to 'mmunt Arb mrfrnb the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as stated. wn Wilnena Whereof, we hereunto set our hand and seal this i4th day of j april .4. D. 1988. it Pretmice f WILLIAM MARTHA M. CROW Blair (of Ina ut. .4t South Burlington this }ss. una4t of Chittenden 1 tea" day of �j0� "Q 11• D. 19 8� WILLIAM F. CROW and MARTHA M. CROW DerannalLv rtpreared, and [hey acknowledged this then, sealed and subscribed, to be their cts' k� - Before me_ �• Notary P lic,- y• ` h Cr P4 0 F U "] Y W U �jV.{jY�► o: 4-U_ 0) Y ¢ Y w Q 0 in Q FW LL O Q J U O z J u W O O W U z ;A QI W �{# > v O v o Q W W V) W Q w D W U F- to Q W O Q o O Q m F- U Q p= 1 OR N �—W O U)F0 0 z } 2 0 W z I J D (r 0W LL i 0 0 (NV) W a o Y N z O ¢ a- m Vol, Pa 5.3 VK 3? Page 2Zg WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that ROBERT A. RING and JUDITH S. RING, husband and wife, of 9 Bay Crest Drive, South Burlington, VERMONT 05402, in the County of Chittenden and State of VERMONT, GRANTOR(S) in the consideration of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION paid to our full satisfaction by CHRISTOPHER D. BISHOP and JANET J. BISHOP, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TENANTS BY THE ENTIRETY of 20 BONANZA PARK , SOUTH BURLINGTON , in the County of CHITTENDEN and State of VERMONT GRANTEE(S) by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee (s) , CHRISTOPHER D. BISHOP and JANET J. BISHOP, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TENANTS BY THE ENTIRETY and hjMftR '/their heirs and assigns forever, a certain piece or land in the City of South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of VERMONT, described as follows, viz: Being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to Robert A. Ring and Judith S. Ring, husband and wife, deed of Ireland Industries, Inc., dated AUGUST 23, 1985 and recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records on August 27, 1985 in Book 213 at Page 262. A parcel of land with all buildings thereon located on the north side of'a new road entitled Bay Crest Drive, with a frontage and south line on Bay Crest Drive of 95.00 feet, a west line of 168.88 feet, a north line of 98.69 feet, and an cast line of 171.67 feet. Said lot contains 16,483 square feet and is all of Lot 029 as shown on a Plan entitled "Plat of Survey of: Lot No. 28 & Lot No. 29 Bartlett Property South Burlington, Vermont -- Plat for Ireland Industries Burlington, Vermont" dated August 21, 1985, survey revised by: Henry J. Swider, L.S. and recorded in Plat Book 166 at Page 49 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington. Included in this conveyance in common with other grantees and grantor is a right of egress and ingress over the proposed roads shown on said Plan and until such roads are accepted as public highways by the City of South Burlington. This lot is subject to certain protective rnvonnnta dated March 2 1984 of record in Volume 201 at Pages 155-158 of the Miscellaneous Land Records of the City of South Burlington. The property is subject to a right of way reserved by LTH Associates in a deed dated February 7, 1985 and recorded in Volume 211 at Pages 213-214 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PREMISES are subject to any and all covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements and rights of way of record. THE premises hereby intended to be conveyed being known and designated as 9 BAY CREST DRIVE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT. ITY CL5 9� aE�tq Received on page. a� Recorded in al. otSo. Burlington Land Reco, Attest. Margaret. �+�� V P1 3 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee(s), to "M)MV their own use and behoof forever; and we the said Grantor(s), ROBERT A. RING and JUDITH S. RING, h/w for x4mW &ourselves and %y/our heirs, executors and administrators, do covenant- with the said Grantee (s) , CHRISTOPHER D. BISHOP and JANET J. BISHOP husband and wife as tenants by the entirety �,hjMytheir heirs and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents we are the sole owners of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; except as aforesaid and we hereby engage to WARRANT and DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I/We have hereunto set my/our hand(s) and seal(s) this 25th day of March 1993. IN THE PRESENCE -- OF: Witne::5 -ROBEAT A. RINGt W 1 n S JUDITH S. RING STATE OF /nrtl'�- ) COUNTY OFdC//eLk- ) ss. 1 ^l Town/City of flsT�✓L in T !�— County and said YIk - (State), this day of 1993 personally a eared ROBERT A. RING and JUDZ H S. RING, h andhe/she/they acknowledged this instrument by them sealed and subscribed t e his/her/ it free act and deed. Before me, Q� ota Public Tt�231 � Pr'V.,Flo .4AN. D� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 12, 1999 Philip Small Baycrest Condominium Association 29 Justin Morgan Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re Storm Water Retention Basin Dear Mr. Small: During a review and inspection of the storm water retention basins in the Bartlett Brook Watershed it was discovered that the retention basin for the Baycrest Condos had not been maintained and was not functioning. This retention basin was a requirement for the approval of the development. It therefore must be repaired and made to function as originally designed. Unless this basin is repaired, the condo association will be placed in violation of the zoning regulations. Please keep me informed on your progress in correcting this problem. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincer ymond J. Belai Administrative Officer RJB/mcp 1 Encl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 14, 1999 John Larkin Larkin Realty 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Planned Residential Development, Harbor View Road and Baycrest Drive Dear Mr. Larkin: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. q y, th, Director Planning and Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. 130X 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660.2555 (VOICL,-I DD) STEVEN F STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE" G-MAIL(I IRM2555(1p[12h1SPP CO[vt) ROBERT E FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (JMCLEA U1R,\fSPF COM) JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M EUSTACE ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N Y ) May 26, 1999 Raymond J. Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 50403 Re: Land Exchange with John Larkin, Inc. Dear Ray: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W CERNOSIA Pursuant to our conversation, I have enclosed final legal documents relative to the above either for recording, alone, or review, execution and recording by the City. Specifically, this packet includes the following: 1. Quit Claim Deed from John Larkin, Inc., to the City of South Burlington 2. Quit Claim Deed from the City of South Burlington to John Larkin, Inc. 3. Corporate resolution of John Larkin, Inc. 4. Notice of Recording by the South Burlington Planning Commission As we have discussed, the Planning Commission should take action to approve the above -referenced Notice of Recording before the City Council finalizes the property exchange. Once that occurs, however, it will be appropriate for the South Burlington City Council to authorize the conveyance of land from the City to John Larkin, Inc. Obviously, all of the above -stated documents should then be recorded in the City of South Burlington land records. Raymond J. Belair City of South Burlington Page 2 May 25, 1999 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please let me know if you have any questions. Singly, J,dseph S . McLean Enclosures cc: Russell F. Niquette, Jr., Esq. son404O.cor RUSSELL F. NIQUETTE, JR. March 15, 1999 NIQUETTE, NIQUETTE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 7-9 EAST ALLEN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1 WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404-0001 TELEPHONE TELECOPIER RUSSELL F. NIQUETTE, SR. 802-655-0575 802-655-1388 1907-1995 Joseph McLean, Esq. 171 Battery Street P.O. Box 1507 Burlington, VT 05402-1507 Dear Joe: I enclose a certified copy of the resolution of John Larkin Inc. regarding the exchange of land. I trust this satisfies your request. Sincerely Russell F. Niquette, Jr. RFN/lrb Att/ cc: John Larkin Rus-gen/McLean, Joe - Larkin resolution i MAR 1979 STITZEL, PAGE FLETCHF►9 pC ! DRAFT MOTION OF APPROVAL JOHN LARKIN - LTH 6/ 1 /99 I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of John Larkin for the reapproval of a plat originally approved on 1/28/86 for a planned residential development consisting of 89 multi -family units, 10 duplex units, and 45 single-family units, Harbor View Road and Bay Crest Drive, as depicted on a plat entitled "Final Plat, Bartlett Property," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated March, 1982, last revised 1/30/86. This approval is to officially approve the plat recorded in map volume 200, page 26 of the South Burlington Land Records, subject to the following stipulation: 1. The Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission shall stamp and sign the plat recorded in map volume 200, page 26 of the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Prior to the Chair or Clerk of the Planning Commission stamping and signing the recorded plat, a legal document shall be recorded which explains the Planning Commission's action regarding this approval. This legal document shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. f Cfe�-Cc z«-��fr C QIJr • �� � 7::i.yc D`�0 7%LPL � �'`A 88�0 1 y ` +`"• e� 6 P oes:�ao 8Pi3t e. bBa4i�o r) i hoe � p � a6 \ W a e + \ 6\ s o big. g. r 4 HRtt -e = �31 a l South &ergtcn Neighborhood Pecreation Area Pork : I ILI Meadowood at Spear J. A & Z 49 47 B 44 14,400 .1 20. 368 f 14.250 If A > 45 ,T; Y CLERK'S Ok f itt 13,000 .1 V*, 7 _nc_l it 50 48 'Arlo M493 .1 In.. �., �� 1. x ',«... ww« r L /ate i e'�oo / f I G 46 7 14.252 1 f 10 9 12 0 12 i � � ,e by JeWhJUM Of the P13nnft COUM*WAn bf Cit, ct South Eurfingft., Vermont Gn too .19 7 I Sir" ft A ... ... ,. c- rkions cl sai ---day HCRaNIAL LA WM C-Praw w CNN B4R7LETT FRCFI9?7y :II» Rz* 7 Sam) a0i"Yon. KFMS LANSM COMMTMG ENWHEEPM W-1 100 SAM BTEWT, WNNMMtk VOMOWT "I" m.wwum vn i, T GI u omc 10-4pm, Sun May 16, 25 Seymoure St, red house opposite Fire & Ice. MILTON Multi -family ga- rage sale. Moving. Baby items and lots of mist! 5/15 + 5/16. Hunting Ridge Neighborhood. MILTON Oak headboard, kitchenware & other', misc. items. 8 AM. 7 Cherry St. RICHMOND MOVING SALE --Tons of stuff! 5/15 and 5/16, 9 to 5, 425 Snipe Ireland Rd. RICHMOND Mufti -family, Sat 5/15 8AM-3PM. Re- modelling items, baby clothes, toys, furniture. 950 Snipe Ireland Rd. RICHMOND Multi -family Yard Sale - Lawnmow- ers, wooden table and chairs, baby accessories, and more! Fri. noon-5pm, j Sat. 10-5pm. 64 Mead- ows Lane, Riverview Commons. RICHMOND Super ga- rage sale! Antiques. Lots of the usual great stuff, plus large Anvil, sec- tional sofa, & furniture. f Sat, 5/15 & Sun, 5/16. 462 Hidden Pines Circle. S. HERO Retiring, mov- ing, scaling down! Davis Cabinet Dining Table & 7 chairs, Bang & Olufson receiver & programmable nl ucvnue r"Uvniy a after 30 years! Sat. 5, 9am-3pm. Queen sofa bed, antique la - desk, tools; garden - items, linens and rel Rte 116. St. orge Estates, watch signs. ,art clutter to cash with roe Press Classified ad. Call 658.3321. TERBURY Moving e. Comic books, card nes, clothing, aquar- t and stand, books, hes, end table, other jns. Sat and Sun 9am- jn - 207 Acorn Drive. 121244-3512 for ISTON 111 Good - Or in Southridge. S day Onlyl Kids toys, h hid items, rocking chair, bunk bed, dresser, compact prolinea com- otller, desk set & more! WI LI5TON 163 Bradley L Ault till am' ,y, furniture, t , tools, drapes, etc. SJ 9-3,879-3617 WI ISTON Sat. 5/15 9 to . Quality items: furni- tu, household, clothes, to [some brand new!], boi)ks. 21 Nob Hill. MOVING SALE Many items Incl. - Antique me- hooggany dining room set $850, 3-pc redwood out- door set $75, maple HARDBODIES NTERTAINMEI s always. the be PLANET ` ROCK Best Bachelor Parties. ",Gorgeous dancers. Up to 12 nightly. Reserve seating. 802-479-0234 SOLID GOLD DANCERS Birthdays, Bachelor, B*heloreIte, Strip-O- GrAms, Call 862-1377 )VERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ski Housing )nty slow Street )ski. VT 05401 655-2360 S crate sealed BIDS w be received for a c puter network Con- n tad digital copier, p ,er and fax machine. T digital system must b� Windows and Novell c patible. The bids s uld include installa- ti training, services, su plies and the follow- ing minimum specifica- tio1ns 20 pages per minute duplexing/sorting paper size 4x6 upto 11x17 reduction/enlarger stapler The Owner will receive bids at their offices at 83 Barlow Street in Wi- nooski, Vermont until 3.00 p.m. [local time] Thursday, May 27, 1999. Bids will be publicly opened and read aloud. Bids may not be modi- fied, withdrawn or cancelled for 30 days. The owner reserves the right to reject any and all bids and the right to waive any informalities in the bid submissions. Interested bidders should contact the Own- ers Representative Wendy Sweet at [8021 655-2360 with any ques- tions and clarifications. May 14, 15, 16. 1999 INVITATION TO BID The Vermont Veterans' Home, Bennington, Ver- mont is soliciting bids to provide personal serv- ices by qualified and/or licensed [if required] pro- viders of personal serv- ices beginning on or about July, 1, 1999. The following services are open for bids: • Audit/Cost Reporting • Chaplain • Computer Support Services • Dentistry w/ Dental Hygienist Services • Dietitian Consultant • Heat System Performance • Institutional Cook, Per Diem • Legal Consultant • Medical Director • Occupational Therapist Compact V Commission, 34 Barre Street, Suite 2, Montpelier, VT 05601 r 14. 15, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesdayy June .1, 1999, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1] Proposed amendment to Section 6.601 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The pur- pose of this amendment is to allow planned resi- dential developments within the Southeast Quadrant District to in- clude certain non-resi- dential uses. This amendment affects all land zoned Southeast Quadrant District. 21 Proposed amendment to the South Burlington Official Map to shift the location of a planned City Center street. The amendment involves the planned southerly exten- sion of Mary Street to an intersection with Market Street and then proceed- ing southerly and south easterly between the Blue Mall [150 Dorset Street] and the Orchid Restaurant [5 Market Street]. 31 In accordance with the City of South Burlington Ordinance Regarding Street Naming & Street Addressing, the Planning Commission will hold a publiu hearing to con- sider name changes to the following streets: a] a Portion of Twin 7 Terrace, b] Duff Drive, c Comstock Circle, d Branch Court, and e Poor Farm Road. 4] Final plat application of John Larkin for reap- proval of a plat for multi family Clusters C & D of the LTH development on Harbor View Road and Bay Crest Road. This plat was originally ap- proved on 1/28/86, how- ever, the applicant failed to property record the plat. Copies of the items are available for public in- spection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission May 15, 1999 STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT OF CHITTENDEN, SS. PROBATE COURT DOCKET NO, 28582 IN RE THE ESTATE OF ROBERT H. MEUNIER LATE OF SO. BURLINGTON NOTICE TC CREDITORS of the Meu- 4 i V TO RESPONI TO OM PRESS BO NUMBER Burlington Free Press P.O. Box 10 Burlington, VT 05402 Att: Free Press Bo) ACCOUNTING/ RECEPTION Growing marketing com munications firm seeks ar accounting assistant/re. ceptionist. Responsibil ities will include answer ing phones, A/R, A/P, entering timesheets and other accounting duties. Must have good computer knowledge, attention to detail and phone skills. Accounting experience and/or education a plus. Send resume & cover let- ter & salary requirements to: M. Hemingway at KSV, 212 Battery St., Burling- ton, VT 05401. No phone calls please. ACCOUNTING Full Time Position. Established building products dealer has an opening for an accounting clerk. Primary duties will include com- puterized sales order entry, cash application, bank deposits, & A/R collections. Ideal candi- date will be able to per- form multiple tasks in a fast -paced environment. Accuracy & attention to detail a must. Experience in a construction busi- ness would be a plus. Please send resume and cover letter to: Overhead Door Company of Bur- Im ton, PO Box 844, Williston, VT 05495, Attn: Controller. jyVpOA-f Mrs � / BOOK KEEPER Imme- diate Openingsl $9410 per hr. dependant on exper. Send resume to: 3038 Shelburne Rd., Shelburne VT 05482 or fax to 802-985-8003 Attn: Bill. Thrifty Car Rental & Pacific Gas ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR Responsible for oversee- ing A/P, A/R, Processing and Payroll support. The Vermont Teddy Bear Co., 6655 Shelburne Rd., Shel- burne, VT or fax [802] 985-1304. Activist SUMMER JOBS for the ENVIRONMENT $3000-$4500/ Summer -Great experience • Fun workplace -Make a Difference! Work with VPIRG to pro- tect open space and wild- life habitat. Perfect job for bright, ougoing idealists. Rapid advancement, Ca- reer opps. Church St. BURLINGTON Call Sandy 862-1600 ACTIVITIES ASST/20 Hrs/wk Facilitate group activities for senior com• member/ toJprovide cad ministrative & secretaris services. Need Window: 95, advanced Word Per fact. Duties: telephones billing, document prepar ation, mailings. Competi tive compensation. Re Ply: Personnel, Po Bo) 1660, Williston, V1 05495. ADMINISTRATION Avail, at Burlington Foodser. vice Co. in the Purchas• ing Dept. Microsoft Word, Excel, Mac and PC's imperative. Re- sponsibilities incl. desk- top publishing, creating/ proofing marketing ma- terial, and typing. Good communication & phone skills a must,marketing skills/exper. is helpful. Send resume to: Director of Purchasing, P.O. Box 547, Burlington, VT 05402-0547. ADMINISTRATIVE SU- PERVISOR National Managed Care Company seeking self - directed administrative supervisor in Williston VT office, capable of deci- sion making, while lead- ing an administrative staff in a busy office. Exper. in Microsoft soft- ware; Word Access, Ex- cel & Lotus Notes neces- sary. People skills vital. Excel. benefits incl. Send cover letter & resume to. Concentra Managed Care, Inc. Po Box 944 Williston, VT 05495. [802] 879-5373. 1DMINISTRATOR Pro- gressive publication seeks half-time manager for Burlington office. Light bookkeeping, cor- respondence, general of- fice tasks. Must be com- puter -savvy, self-starter, publishing experience helpful. Salary negotia- ble. Send letter and re- sume to: TF, PO Box 468 Burlington, VT 05402- )468, or call [802]658- 4SST �TruGreen-Chem- -awn, America's largest awn care provider, seek- ng reliable office assist- ant. Monday -Friday 12:30-9PM. Excellent phone manner and com- puter skills required. Ex- cellent benefits. Cali Tyler at 863-8007. UDE Burlington care home. 32 hours, da�s or 3-8pm. Cook, Nan, bathe. 800-325-4071. URPORT National Car Rental is hiring Service Agents, FT, $8/hr+bene- fits. Apply any time at National airport counter. 4NIMAL TECH Must be hard working, dependa- ble, experience a plus. Call 434-3691. APPOINTMENT SETTERS Needed. Flexible hours. Hourly wages + bon- uses. Call 865-6909. AQUATICS ACTIVITY LEADER 6/17- 8/6 IM-F Sam-4:30prtt] $1800. Teach swim les- sons and oversee free swimming for kids 6-12 yrs. Supervise 1 F/T life- guard. Must be lifeguard certified. WSI certifica- tion preferred. Reply to: UVM Adventure CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant 2) Name of Subdivisio 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plot designer since preliminary plat application cD 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: 5) Submit five copies and k= reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and c,,QQntaining all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a mar subdivis icon . ( Signatur'e.Z ai§1ic At or contact person Date CY4inol. L RK'S OF99FQQICE 3° Received 1911. at Recorded on pc - of So. Burlington Land Records ��>;�o►na NOTICE OF RECORDING Attest: Margaret A.1I,h►n February 23, 1999 the City of South Burlington Planning Commission granted final plat approval on the application of William and Nancy Jacobus and Christopher and Janet Bishop to amend a previously -approved planned residential development consisting of ninety-seven (97) multi -family units and forty-five (45) single family units, Bartlett Property, Baycrest Road. The amendment consists solely of adjusting the property line between two (2) developed lots, 9 and 11 Baycrest Road as depicted on a Plat entitled "Plat of Survey of: Lot #28 & Lot #29, Bartlett Property, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Henry J. Swider dated August 21, 1985 (the "Plat"), which approval was not appealed and became final; and WHEREAS, said Plat was recorded on August 22, 1985 in Volume 166, Page 49 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and WHEREAS, said Plat had not been stamped or otherwise approved by the City of South Burlington Planning Commission when originally recorded; and WHEREAS, the owners of Lot #28 and Lot #29 as depicted on the Plat requested that this Commission grant final Plat approval to approve the above -described Plat in a legally sufficient manner; and WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission having granted final Plat approval relative to the Amendment of the Planned Residential Development and related Plat, the same having been previously recorded in the Land Records in the City of South Burlington, wishes by the adoption and recording of this Notice to reaffirm and confirm said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, Notice is hereby given that (i) the Plat recorded August 22, 1985 in Volume 166, Page 49 of the City of South Burlington Land Records shall be stamped and endorsed by the South Burlington Planning Commission as required by, and so as to satisfy, the requirements of §508 of the City of South Burlington Subdivision Regulations and 24 V.S.A. §4416, and (ii) the lots depicted on said Plat have been and shall otherwise continue to be subject to all of the conditions and restrictions contained in the Final Plat Approval which conditions and restrictions shall run with said land and be binding upon the current owners thereof and their respective successors, heirs and assigns, unless or until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this day of , 1999. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION By: Chair cam\NeilVacobus.Not MILLER, EGGLESTON & CRAMER, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAWCC-1j)) 150 SOUTH CHAMPLAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1489 �. P 'U BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1489 MARTIN K. MILLER JON R. EGGLESTON ANNE CRAMER KATHLEEN M.BOE MARK A. SAUNDERS VICTORIA J. BROWN SCOT L. KLINE PETER R YOUNG ROBERT A. PINEL COUNSEL PATRICIA L. RICKARD NEIL WHEELWRIGHT Ms. Margaret A. Picard, CMC South Burlington City Clerk South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 April 9, 1999 RE: Notice of Recording in Volume 451, Page 261 Jacobus / Bishop Dear Peggy: TELEPHONE (802) 864-0880 (BuRLnvGTON) (802) 229-2218 (MONTPELiER) TELECOPIER (802) 864-0328 (BURLiNGTON) (802) 229-2513 (MONTPELuER) I have enclosed a check in the amount of $7.00 for the recording fee in the above - referenced matter. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very `truly yours, • 1p" Neil Wheelwright For the Firm Enclosure cc: Raymond Belair Bill and Nancy Jacobus David Greenberg, Esq. Christopher and Janet Bishop fi4m MIILI!M CITY ME TO: Margaret A. Picard, CMC, City Clerk 575 Dorset Street, So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 199? Deed 10 "1 Attachments Copies: Uncertified copy _ Certified copy Examination of Records by Clerk Examination of Records by Others RE ?OTAL CYTY CLF RK S OIF FICE 3(0 1 Received 19 I_L at $ �" Recorded in ol. � on page Of So. Burlington Land Records �`�a NOTICE OF RECORDING Attest: Margaret A. ftX*,r�n February 23, 1999 the City of South Burlington Planning Commission granted final plat approval on the application of William and Nancy Jacobus and Christopher and Janet Bishop to amend a previously -approved planned residential development consisting of ninety-seven (97) multi -family units and forty-five (45) single family units, Bartlett Property, Baycrest Road. The amendment consists solely of adjusting the property line between two (2) developed lots, 9 and 11 Baycrest Road as depicted on a Plat entitled "Plat of Survey of: Lot #28 & Lot #29, Bartlett Property, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Henry J. Swider dated August 21, 1985 (the "Plat"), which approval was not appealed and became final; and WHEREAS, said Plat was recorded on August 22, 1985 in Volume 166, Page 49 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and WHEREAS, said Plat had not been stamped or otherwise approved by the City of South Burlington Planning Commission when originally recorded; and WHEREAS, the owners of Lot #28 and Lot #29 as depicted on the Plat requested that this Commission grant final Plat approval to approve the above -described Plat in a legally sufficient manner; and WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission having granted final Plat approval relative to the Amendment of the Planned Residential Development and related Plat, the same having been previously recorded in the Land Records in the City of South Burlington, wishes by the adoption and recording of this Notice to reaffirm and confirm said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, Notice is hereby given that (i) the Plat recorded August 22, 1985 in Volume 166, Page 49 of the City of South Burlington Land Records shall be stamped and endorsed by the South Burlington Planning Commission as required by, and so as to satisfy, the requirements of §508 of the City of South Burlington Subdivision Regulations and 24 V.S.A. §4416, and (ii) the lots depicted on said Plat have been and shall otherwise continue to be subject to all of the conditions and restrictions contained in the Final Plat Approval which conditions and restrictions shall run with said land and be binding upon the current owners thereof and their respective successors, heirs and assigns, unless or until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this 5 �day of ' , �� r c 1999. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION By: �;'� a �, Y-/ Chair cam\Nei]Vacobus.Not CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 30, 1999 Neil Wheelwright, Esquire Miller, Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 9 & 11 Bay Crest Road Dear Mr. Wheelwright: Enclosed is a copy of the February 23, 1999 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plan be recorded in the land records within 90 days (6/7'99). If you have any questions, please give me a call. C,incerely, Aeith,irector Planning & Zoning JW/mcp I Encl State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation March 26, 1999 David Greenburg, Esquire 2 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Dear David: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-5656 Subject: Case number # 4C0526, L.T.H. Associates - 120 Condominium Units located off Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont. I have reviewed the Wastewater Management's file for the above subject project. The file is somewhat confusing as is the Certification of Compliance #4C0526 which approved 160 residential units comprising of 120 multi -family, 34 single family and 6 duplexes on approximately 40 acres. The stamped approved plans, Project 81139, Sheet 2 "Final Plat" dated March 1982 prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., does identify Cluster A condominiums on a 5.77 acre lot, Cluster B condominiums on a 3.90 acre lot, Cluster C condominiums on a 1.52 acre lot and Cluster D condominiums on a 2.42 acre lot. It is my opinion that the stamped approved plans did indicate the intention of the developer to create the individual cluster condominium lots. Therefore, it is my opinion that Certification of Compliance #4C0526 approved the cluster condominium lots as shown on the stamped approved plans identified above and it is not necessary to file for a Subdivision Permit for each cluster condominium lot. Enclosed please find a copy of Certification of Compliance #4C0526 and #4C0526-A. Please contact me at 1-802-879-5675 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Enclosure copies: City of South Burlington Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 4CO526 ) LAvJS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT LTH Associates and Bartlett, et. al. ) Vermont State Board of Health ADDRESS 1185 Shelburne Road ) Regulations, Chapter 5, Sanitary So. Burlington, VT 05401 ) Engineering, Subchapter 1, Public Buildings This project, consisting of an exterior sewer extension and water extension to serve a project generally described as the phased construction of 160 resid- ential units (120 multi -family, 34 single family and 6 duplex) on approximately 40 acres and commercial development on approximately 30 acres, located along a proposed 6,000 foot road with access to U.S. Route 7 in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions: (1) The project must be completed as shown on the plans: Sheet Prepared by Dated Revisions 1 Krebs &•Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 2 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 3 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 4 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 5 Krebs•& Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 6 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 8 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 11 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 12 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. March, 1982 7-6-82 21 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. Dec., 1981 7-6-82 22 Krebs & Lansing Eng. Inc. Dec., 1981 and which have been stamped "APPROVED" by the Division of Protection. No alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where written application has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained. (2) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (3) The Vermont Department of Health is to be contacted in regards to any regulations and/or licenses required by their department. (They may be reached at 60 Main Street, Burlington, Vermont, or by phoning 802-862- 5701, ext. 321) (4) This project is approved to obtain potable water from the city of South Burlington's municipal water system provided the water main extension is constructed in accordance with the Department of Health's "Letter of Certificate of Ccmpliance 4CO526 Page 2 Approval" dated July 28, 1982. (5) A professional engineer, registered in the State'of Vermont is to strictly supervise the construction of the sewer main extension. Upon completion of construction, the supervising engineer is to submit a written certification stating all work has been completed in accordance with the stamped "APPROVED" plans. The engineers certification is to include, but not limited to, the results of all infiltration/exfiltration completed on the sewers and manholes. (6) The engineer's certification addressed in condition #5 above is to be sub- mitted to the Division of Protection prior to the occupancy of any dwelling unit or commercial property. (7) No construction is authorized on any of the commercial lots, duplex lots, or multi -family units until such time as the appropriate plans for the interior plumbing and ventilation have been submitted to and approved by the rivision of Protection. Dated this 24th day of September, 182in the Town of Essex Junction, Vermont. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer cc: P. Howard Flanders, PE Katherine Powers Fire Prevention Health Department City Planning Commission Krebs & Lansing Engineers, Inc. EPC/bmg enc. STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Re: 4CO526- A ) Certified to comply with L.T.H. Associates and ) Environmental Protection Bartlett et al ) Rules, Chapter 4 - Public 1185 Shelburne Road ) Buildings and Chapter 9 - South Burlington, Vermont ) Plumbing This project, consisting of interior plumbing for the eight and twelve unit "Flat" buildings of condominium clusters A and B only of the development previously approved in Certification of Compliance 4CO526 located along a proposed road off U.S. Route 7 in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby certified to comply with the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions: (1) The project must be completed as shown on the plans M-1 through M-6, each dated June 29, 1983 prepared by Avengco, Ltd. and which have been stamped "APPROVED" by the Division of Protection. No alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where written application has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained. (2) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (3) The applicant is reminded that all plumbing material and workmanship, must meet the standards of the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 9, Plumbing; the National Plumbing Code; and the requirements of the Vermont Fire Prevention Section of the Department of Labor and Industry (4) The second floor bathtub waste lines in the light and twelve unit buildings must enter the three-inch vertical stacks -at the same level as the water closets or these bathtubs shall be individually vented. (5) Upon completion of the rough -in for the waste plumbing, and prior to said plumbing being covered or closed -in, the Agency of Environmental Conservation is to be contacted so that we may have an opportunity to inspect the workmanship. 4C0526-1 Page Two L.T.H. Associates and Bartlett et al (6) This Certification of Compliance is only for those condominium buildings within clusters A and B which are identified as 8 and 12 unit "FLATS". This Certification of Compliance does not authorize construction of any other condominium units until such time as the appropri- ate interior plumbing and ventilation plans referred to in condition #7 of Certification of Compliance 4C0526 have been submitted to and approved by the Agency of En- vironmental Conservation.. (7) The Vermont Department of Health is to be contacted in regards to any regulations and/or licenses required by their department. (They may be reached at 60 Main Street, Burlington, Vermont or by phoning 802-862-5701, extension 2565): (6) With the issuance of this Certification of Compliance, condition #7 of Certification of Compliance 4C0526 has been satisfied for the condominium units described above. Dated this twenty-ninth day of July, 1983 in the Town of Essex Junction, Vermont. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION Ernest P. Christianson District Administrator EPC/pol CC: Donald Robisky Katherine Powers Fire Prevention Department of Health City of South Burlington Avengco, Ltd. `lARpfiJ� �i&u/ 'RV ACT 250 NOTICE NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT BY NON-USE #4C0526-5 10 V.S.A. CHAPTER 151 Notice is hereby given that on August 6, 2003, a petition to abandon permit 4CO526-5 was filed by John Larkin, Inc., to abandon the permit by non-use. The permit authorized the construction of a 20,000 sf office building on Lot #9 of the Bartlett subdivision, located on Harbor View Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. The District #4 Environmental Commission will treat this petition under Environmental Board Rule 38(B) -- Abandonment by non-use. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless a public hearing is requested or the Commission holds a hearing on its own motion. The written request for a hearing must state with specificity why a hearing is required and what additional evidence will be presented pursuant to Environmental Board Rules 14. No hearing will be convened unless a party notifies the Commission on or before September 2, 2003, or the Commission sets the matter for hearing on its own motion. If a timely hearing request is received, the hearing will be convened as soon after that date on which a hearing can be arranged. Parties entitled to participate are the municipality, the municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission, state agencies, adjoining property owners, and persons granted party status pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 14(B). Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this I I day of August, 2003 By y PeterCe.el Environ ental Board District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-5658 e-mail: peter.keibel@anr.state.vt.us W:\Act250\DIST4\PROJECTS\4CO526\4CO526-S.abo .. ... • ... ♦ ?.' . • � _ .. � r a .. r f '-AWN AA�. J. 4 r � CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this I I day of August, 2003, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT BY NONUSE #4C0526-6, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES: John Larkin, Inc. Larkin Realty 410 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05401 Bill Nedde, III Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Donna Kinville, Citiy Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 R YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Thomas Little, Chair 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS 11 On File at District Commission Office Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of August, 2003. • w:cs4C0526-5/cc r s mo, A in rative Secretary i 879-5660 State of Vermont Public Building Permit LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. PB-4-1245 Chapter 4, Public Buildings APPLICANT LTH Associates Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal ADDRESS 1185 Shelbuene Road Chapter 8, Water Supply So. Burlington, VT 05401 Exterior water and sewer service and site Foundation work only. This project, consisting of construction of a new office building (maximum 30 employees) with municipal water and sewer services located on lot 9, Harborview Road, South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4C0526-5. (2) This Permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to construction. (3) The project must be completed as shown on the "Site Plan, Proposed Office Building" dated July 1986 last revised 3/10/87; Sheet 21 "Details, Bartlett Property" dated 12/81 prepared by Robert Krebs, and which have been stamped APPROVED by the Division of Protection. No changes shall be made to the approved plan without prior written approval from the Agency of Environmental Conservation. (4) This Permit is limited to exterior water, sewer, and site and foundation work ONLY. Construction of the actual structure is limited, at this time, to foundation work only and does not include nor is permission granted for the installation of interior plumbing either above or below grade. (Please note, interior plumbing is defined to include waste and water piping beginning 3 feet outside of the foundation wall and extending into the building). Upon completion of the water, sewer, and site work, all work must stop on the project until written approval for additional work has been obtained from this office. (5) All conditions set forth in Permit number 4C0526, shall remain in effect except as amended or modified herein. WATER (6) The project is approved for connection to a municipal type water system approved by the Department of Health provided that all construction is in accordance with the approved plans and the Environmental Protection Rules, Effective September 10, 1982. SEWAGE (7) The project is approved for connection to a municipal sewage collection system. The work shall be done in accordance with the Environmental Protection Rules, Effective September 10, 1982. (8) The project is approved for connection to the Bartlett's Bay wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 450 gallons of sewage per day. Public Building Permit PB-4-1245 Page 2 PLUMBING (9) No construction of the building beyond the foundation as authorized by condition #4 above is permitted until complete and satisfactory plans for the interior plumbing and ventilation have been submitted to and approved by the Protection Division. Dated in the Village of Essex Junction, Vermont this 3rd day of April, 1987. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION Mary K./Clark Assistant Regional Engineer cc: Donald Robisky City of South Burlington Geoffrey W. Green Dept. of Health Dept. of Labor and Industry Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 6 EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION # 4C0526-5 APPLICANT E D R E A= X A E N T= TOWN H T C T TPC = TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION I E E E RPC = Regional Planning Commission B I R AEC = Agency of Environmental Conservation I V E T E D D N B 0. Y NATURE OF EXHIBIT Date Entered 1 11-21-86 A application form by J. Larkin (10-31-86) 2 it It notice - comm. of cons. (undated) 3 It " cert. of service form (undated) 4 it " document - Schedule B - Act 250 info (10-31-86) 5 it " letter - re: conformance to South Burlington Plan by J. Lafleur (8-8-86) 6 it " letter - re: mun. water and sewer by W. Szymanski, City of South Burlington (8-8-86) 7 it " letter - re: police service by R. Magee, South Burlington Police Dept. 8 it " letter - re: fire service by J. Goddette, Sr., South Burlington Fire Dept. 9 it " ocument - re: i_raffic impacts by D. Spitz, North Country Planning (9-8-86) 10 it " letter - re: gas service by M. Poirier, Vermont Gas Systems (8-18-86) 11 it " letter - re: electric service by E. Shlatz, Green Mountain Power (9-16-86) 12 " " map - project location on U.S.G.S. map 13 " " plan - "Site Plan & Profile" by R. Blanchard Design Assoc. S-1 (5-22-84, rev. 6-12-84, 9-17-84) 14 " " plan - "Water & Sewer Location" by Krebs and Lansing (7-86) 15 " " plan - "Details" by Krebs and Lansing (12-81) 16 " " plan - "Details" by Krebs and Lansing (12-81) 17 " " plan - "Details" by Krebs and Lansing (5-82) EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION #4C0526-5 E D R E A= APPLICANT X A E N T= TOWN H T C T TPC = TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION I E E E RPC = Regional Planning Commission B I R AEC = Agency of Environmental Conservation I V E T E D D N B 0. Y NATURE OF EXHIBIT Date Entered 18 7-2-87 19 it 20 " 21 " 22 " 23 " 24 " 25 " 26 " 27 " 28 " 29 " 30 " 31 " 32 " 33 " 34 " 35 " 36 " AEC Entry of Appearance, Pre -Hearing Comments " Supplemental Pre -Hearing Comments " Letter, W. Neede " Erosion Control Measures" (5-28-87) " document - Construction Procedures " document - Manual - Erosion Control Measures " document - Minutes, South Burlington Planning Commission " letter - re: South Burlington F6lice Dept. " letter - South Burlington Fire Dept. " letter - Jane Lafleur, City Planner re: conformance to Town Plan (5-8-87) " Mocument - D. Spitz, undate on traffic (5-11-87) " document - Draft Discharge Permit " plan - "Site Plan" by Krebs and Larising (7-86) " plan - Site Drainage and Soil Types by same dwg. 15 (3-82) " plan - Revised Site Plan, by same (7-86) " plan - Topography Plan (2-87) " plan - Construction Drawing, Cl by Doherty Cons. Engs. (5-26-87) " plan - Elevation, Harbor view lot #9 by Goldsmith Arch. (5-7-87) " plan - sign detail by same (6-12-87) AEC Public Building Permit by Div. of Protection (4-3-87) I/ STATE OF VERMONT ` 1 DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION #4 RE: LTH Associates -1-185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, %'T 05401 I. INTRODUCTION Amendment Application #4C0526-5, Findings of and Conclusio►is of L.a+a and Order., 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250) On April 6, 1987 art pnt application for an Act. 250 permit was filed b LTH Associates, 1185 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, V ruction of .a 20,000 square foot office building with municipal water and sewer on Lot. #9 of a previously approved commercial subdivision located off of Shelburne: Road Lit South Bur.l.ingturi, Vermont. The tract of land involved in the commercial subdivision consists of 30 acres with approximately 1.5 acres involved in this project. The applicants legal interest is ownership in fee simple described in deeds recorded on January 21, 1946 and April 8, 1974. Under Act 250, projects are reviewed based on the 10 criteria of 10 V.S.A., Sec. 6086(a) 1-10. Condition 44 of Land Use Permit #4C0526 requires that each permit amendment application be reviewed under Criteria 1(Air), l(Is), 1(C), 1(E), 2 & 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9(F), 9(G) and 9(J). Before granting a permit, the District Commission must find that. the project complies with these criteria and is not detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. Decisions must be stated in the form of findings of fact. and conclusions of law. The fact, the Commission has relied upon are contained in the documents on File identified as Exhibits #1 through #36 and the evidence received at a hearing held on May 7, 1987 and Jule 2, 1.987. At the end of the final hearing, the proceeding was recessed pending submission of additional information. The hearing was finally adjourned on July 9, 1987 upon receipt of all the information and final deliberations. Parties to the application who attended the henrinj are: The Applicant by Susan Dimick, Robert Krebs, and Dan Morris. Entry of Appearance and Pre Hearing Comments by Fred Emigh of the Agency of Natural Resources. II. FINDINGS OF FACT In making the following findings, the Commission has summarized the statutory language of Criteria 1(Air), I(B) l(C), l(E), 2 & 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9(F), 9(G) and 9(J) of the: 10 criteria as required by condition #7 of Land tjse Permit #4C0526. Page 2 Findings of Fact #4C0526-5 SECTION 6086(a) (1) WATER AND AIR POLLUTION: The Commission finds that this development will not result in undue air pollution. This finding depends on and is supported by the findings noted under the subsections of this criterion: SECTION 6086 (a) (1) AIR POLLUTION: The Commission finds that this development will not result in undue air pollution. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 1. The Applicant will supply water and calcium chloride as necessary to control dust during construction (Exhibit #4). 2. The building will be heated with gas/warm air and there will be no process emissions, noxious odors, or noise pollution from this project (Exhibit#4). 3. The project will involve the installation cif' 80 parking spaces bringing the total number of parking spaces to 710. This is below the threshold number of new parking spaces which the Agency of Environmental Conservation has determined will result in air pollution (Exhibit.#4). SECTION 6086(a) (1) (B) WASTE DISPOSAL: The Commission finds that this development will meet applicable Division of Protection Regulations and will not result in the injection of waste materials or harmful. or toxic; substances into groundwater or wells. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 4. The estimated 450 gallons per day of sewage will be disposed of through connection to the municipal treatment plant (Bartletts Bay). A Public Bui.l.ding Permit PB-4-1245 has been issued by the Assistant -Regional Engineer on April 3, 1987. The Commission accepts this as evidence that the disposal of wastes meets the applicable Environmental Protection Rules for connection to a municipal treatment plant and will not result in undue water pollution (Exhibit #36). 5. Stormwater runoff from the paved parking lot and roof will be directed to a catch basin, through a settling tank prior to discharge to the South Burlington storm drainage system. A Draft Discharge Permit has been issued which the Commission accepts as evidence that the project will meet applicable water resources regulations (Exhibit #28). 6. All stumps will be removed to an api)roved dump stump site (Exhibit #4). Page 3 Findings of Fact #4C9526-5 SECTION 6086 (a) (1) (C) WATER CONSERVATION: The Commission finds that this development will utilize the best available technology for water conservation in this building. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 7. Water conserving plumbing fixtures have been specified for these buildings (Exhibit #4) and the Applicant. has agreed to continually maintain these fixtures. SECTION 6086 (a) (1) (E) STREAMS: The Commission finds that this deve.l.opment on or adjacent to the banks will not maintain the natural condition of the stream and will endanger the health, safety or welfaro of the public. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 8. A stream is located on the northern boundary of the project which outlets into lake Champlain at. [3art.let.ts Bay. The 'stream is bounded on both sides by a ravine and is particularly steep on the south bank with slopes ranging from 75% to 100% depending upon the location (Exhibits #31 and #32). 9. The project is located on the south bank with the construction of improvements occurring at an elevation from 189 feet to 210 feet. The stream elevat.iori is approximately 155 feet. The construction of improvements is 50 feet from the centerline of the stream (Exhibits #31 and #32). 10. The parking lot extends to the top of the ravine in numerous places and the building is located 5 to 10 feet from the top of the ravine (Exhibits #31 sand #32). 11. The top of the bank is fairly heavily wooded with large pines, smaller hardwood trees and undergrowth. The drip line of the larger trees is approximately 20 to 30 feet from the top of the bank. the ravine is less wooded and exhibits signs of naturally occurring erosion (Exhibit #20). 12. The applicant proposes to use a consti•uctiorc procedure known as Sheet Piling which is outlined in Exhibit. #21. Page 4 Findings of Fact #4C0526-5 Discussion The proposed building and parking IoL would necessitate the removal of many of the mature softwood trees and existing vegetation along the top of the bank. In some cases it would require the removal of limbs and some trees from the ravine to protect the building and. its occupants. The removal of the vegetation from the top of the stream bank and disturbance in the ,.•avine that may occur from construction will weaken and disturb the already fragile ecosystem of the stream and st rea:imbanli . While there maybe very few visible signs of natured deterioration of the stream and its banks after project completion, as mature trees lose their ability to survive, the deterioration in the natural condition of the system will accelerate. As the bank continues to lose its vegetative cover-, increase sediment 1 oadirig into the stream will occur whi.c::h discharges into Jake Champlain: Therefore the Commission finds that this development will not maintain the natural condition of the stream and with continued deterioration will endanger the general welfare of.the public. The Commission recommends, as does the Agency of Natural. Resources, that. the undisturbed buffer zone be extended from the top of the stream bank to the building to allow the existing vegetation a better chance of survival. and to allow the stream and its banks to maintain as much as possible their natural condition. SECTION 6086(a) (2 and 3) WATER EXISTING WATER SUPPLIES: The Commission finds that there available to meet the needs of this development will riot place existing supply. This finding by the following: AVAILABILITY AND IMPACT ON is sufficient: water this development and that an unreasonable biirden on an depends on and is supported 13. This project will utilize approximately 450 gallons per day of water. The Commission accepts the letters from the Town Manager (Exhibit #6) and the Town Planner (Exhibit #26) as evidence that there is sufficient water available and that the project will not restrict nor encumber present users. SECTION 6086(a) (4) SOIL EROSION AND THE CAPACITY OF THE LAND TO HOLD WATER: The Commission finds that the development will cause unreasonable soil erosion and a reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water so that a dangerous or unhealthy condition may result. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: Page 5 Findings of Fact #4C0526-5 14. The erosion control measures for this project include a snow fence, hay bale erosion barrier and silt fence continuously along the west, north and east side, of the project. The existing naturally eroding bank will be stabilized by using matting (Exhibit #20). 15. A site specific erosion control. plan has been prepared and details are outlined in Exhibits #16, #21, #22, and #31. 16. An engineer will locate and install the erosion control measures and inspect these measures weekly to insure the system is properly maintained (Exhibit #20). 17. The representatives of the applicant. testified that adequate erosion control measures would be taken during construction and that no unreasonable soil erosion would result during construction (Testimony of W. Nedde). 18. The parking lot will. be graded so that.. runoff is directed to the south and west to a catch basin (See Findings of Fact #5). The parking 1.ot will have a curb to prevent runoff to the ravine. 19. The existing vegetation along the bank would be removed were necessary and replaced with spreading yews as outlined in Exhibit #13. Discussion As stated in Findings of Fact #11, the stream bank is already exhibiting erosion. The appli.t;ant proposes to construct the parking lot and the building to with 5 to 10 feet of the top of the stream bank and in some places extends to the top of the stream bank. Although the runoff into the ravine will be decreased the ability of the ravine to withstand erosion will be significantly reduced because of the proposed cutting of most trees above the top of the bank, improvements within 5 to 10 feet of mature trees with drip lines of 20 to 30 feet thereby reducing their ability to survive, insufficient replacement of removed vegetation and cutting of branches and limbs adjacent to the improvements. Therefore, the Commission finds that unreasonable soil erosion will occur either during construction or during the life of the project. The Commission recommends that. an undisturbed buffer zone be implemented to protect the trees and existing vegetation along the stream bank. Page 6 Findings of Fact #4C0526-5 SECTION 6086(a) (5) TRANSPORTATION: The Commission finds that this development will. not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to transportation. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 20. The access to the project is directly off of Harbor View Road, several hundred feet from the intersection of Route 7 and Harbor View Road. A traffic study was prepared to evaluate traffic impacts at the Route 7/Harbor View Road intersection and to consider c,;hether signalization and/or additional turning lanes will be necessary (Exhibit #9). 21. The estimated average weekday traffic volume: for the project is 246 trips. The estimated total A.M. Peak Hour for the project is 46 trips and 44 P.M. Peak Hour trips (Exhibit #9). 22. The intersection analyses indicates that signulization and acceleration/deceleration and/or bypass lanes are not warranted at this time. However this assumes that Route 7 is widened. to 4 or 5 lanes as planned prior to the design year of 1991 (Exhibit #9). The report recommends a -widening of the throat of the intersection to provide additional turning area for the right turning lane to avoid delays for right turning movements. Given the undetermined Location of the proposed southern connector and site related improvements along Route 7, the Commission is concerned that these improvements to the intersection of Route 7 and Harbor View Road be coordinated so as not to create any unreasonable burden upon Route 7. Therefore the Commission will retain the right to review the timing and site specific improvements to the intersection of Harbor View Road and Route 7 and shall require the Applicant to file plans with the Cc�mmissi.on and the Agency of Transportation for improvements prior to occupancy of the building. SECTION (a) (7) MUNICIPAL SERVICES: The Commission finds that this development will not place an unreasonable burden on the ability of the municipality to provide municipal or governmental services. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 23. The South Burlington Fire Chief and Police i;hief have stated that the services of their departments caii be provided to this project (Exhibit #24 and #25). Sewage treatment plant capacity and water services are available to this project (Exhibit #26). Page 7 Findings of Fact #4C0526-5 SECTION 6086(a) (8) AESTHETICS, SCENIC BEAUTY, HISTORIC SITES AND NATURAL AREAS: The Commission finds that the development cail..l not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty- of the area, aesthetics, historic sites or rare or irreplaceable natural areas. The following depends on and is supported by the following: 24. Historic sites, necessary wildlife habitat and rare and irreplaceable natural areas will not be affected by this project (Exhibit #4). 25. The site is gently sloping open meadow, except for a steep, heavily wooded ravine leading down to the stream. The trees to be retained are depicted on Exhibit #31 and the Commission will require that. they be protected by a snow fence during construction. 26. The project will be landscaped as outlined in Exhibit #13 and will retain as many of the existing trees as possible. 27. Exterior lighting will consist of down shield fixtures of the fully shielded box type lumina:ire itihich will be mounted no higher than 12 feet (Testimony of Robert Krebs). Other exterior lighting will be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light. sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 29. The sign will be unlit and is approximately 10 feet high with a base width of 3 feet as out.lirted in Etihibit #35. 29. The exterior of the building is a beige Drivit or stucco color material with bronze sliding glass windows as outlined in Exhibit #34. SECTION 6086(a) (9) (F) ENERGY CONSERVATION: The Commission finds that the planning and design of the development does reflect the principals of ene,-gy conservation and does incorporate the best available technology for the efficient use of recovery of energy. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 30. The building is protected to the north by heavy vegetation and open to the south for maximum solar exposure. The entrance is planed on the southeast, the most protected side of the building (Exhibit #4). 31. The office areas with the buildings will be::• constructed using minimum insulation values of R-19 in the exterior walls and R-38 in the ceilings and roof and R-10 around the foundation or slab (Exhibit #4). Page 8 Findings of Fact #4C0526-5 SECTION 6086 (a) (9) (G) PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES: The Commission finds that this development will not involve private utilities because this project will be owned by the - applicant and the Commission will require that: the applicant and all assigns and successors in interest abide by all of the terms and conditions of the permit. SECTION 6086(a) (9) (J) PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES: The Commission finds that utility services are available to this development, that excessive or urnec;onomic dernarltls w i I I not be placed on such facilities or services, and that. the provisions of such services has been planned on the ba�,i:� oi' a projection of reasonable population increase and economic growth as evidenced by the letters from Vermont Gas Company and Green Mountain Power Corporation (Exhibits =10 and #11.). III. CONCLUSION OF LAW Based upon the foregoing Findings of Tact, it is the conclusion of this District Environmental C:'ommission that the project described in the application referred to above, will cause or result in a detriment to public health, safety or general welfare under the criteria described in 1.0 V.S.A. SEC.6086 (a). 10131101 Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-5 is hereby denied. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of August, 1987. By: _.— Evan C. Arch r. Chairman Dis IY/t #4 Commission Other Commissioners participating in this decision: Q, Lynn Whalen Geo frey W Green, Assistant District Coordinator gwg City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 October 13, 1989 Mr. Greg Rabideau LTH Associates 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Lot #9, Harbor View Road Dear Greg: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that all approvals and permits for this project have expired. Approvals and permits expire six months from date of issue (Section 20.30 of the City's zoning r-Z,ilations.) My re- cords indicate that we issued permit. #10535 on January 30, 1987. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call. me. Very truly, Ri<-),ard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer I; State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT AMENDMENT CASE NO. 4CO526-5B APPLICANT: LTH Associates ADDRESS: 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 FOR YO-F. LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250) District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit Amendment #4CO526-5B pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 118, Page 275 of the land records of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to LTH Associates, the "Permittee" as "Grantee". This permit specifically authorizes the permittee to extend the construction completion date from February 1, 1990 to February 1, 1991 for the previously approved 20,000 square foot office building on Lot #9 of the Bartlett commercial subdivision. The Permittee, its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of rand Use Permit #4CO526-5 and amendments remain in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. All construction on this project must be completed by February 1, 1991. 3. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Section 6090(b). Page 2 Land Use Permit Amendment #4CO526-5B Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 6th day of October, 1989. Z,-, Louis- Bori e District #4 Coordinator 4CO5265B/eb By (mot/ , Jam/ 4 �� - L W. Gilbert Li vi ngst Chairman, District #4 Commission Commissioners participating in this decision: M. Lynn Whalen Patricia Tivnan CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Louis Bori e, District Coordinator for the # 4 District of the Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing Land Use Permit Amendment #4CO526-5B, by U.S. Mail, postage paid, on this 6th day of October, 1989 to the following: Greg Rabideau LTH Associates/Larkin Realty 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Margaret Picard, City Clerk 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chairman, Board of Councilmen 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Joe Weith, City Planner City Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Mark Sinclair, Esq. Representative, State Agencies Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - 2 Center Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission W. Gilbert Livingston M. Lynn Whalen Patricia Ti vnan 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Page 2 Certificate of Service #4CO526-5-EB Regional Engineer Ernie Christianson 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Krebs & Lansing 10 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Dick Ward, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Department of Health Att: Donna Chandler 60 Main Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 6th day of October 1989. BY L i s Bori e CS4526-5/eb State of Vermont AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forb;sts, Parks and Recreation Dr,partment of Walt r Resourcr,s & Environmental Engineering Natural Resources Conservation Council December 16, 1986 Mr. John Larkin LTH Associates 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05401 Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 RE: Case No. PB-4-1245 (Act 250 #4C0526-5); New Office Building on Lot #9, Harborview Road, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Mr. Larkin: Our office has completed an initial review of the above referenced project and have determined that the additional information listed below will be needed before approval can be granted. (1) Please submit an engineer's breakdown of the proposed 1,000 gallons per day wastewater flows including the maximum number of employees. Approval for more than 450 gallons per day previously allocated for this lot cannot be given until this information is received. (2) The submitted engineering plans by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., have been reviewed and can be approved. However, the plans must be stamped by a professional engineer registered in the State of Vermont. (3) Please submit two complete sets of interior plumbing plans for this building. The plumbing plans must match the engineering plans in location of the water and sewer services. (The Site Plan submitted by R. G. Blanchard has not been prepared by a professional engineer and cannot be approved. Please note this plan shows different locations to the water and sewer services than the engineering plans. The Division of Protection has received a written request to allow the commencement of construction for the foundation of the above referenced project. In accordance with the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 4 - Public Buildings, Section 4-03(2), authorization is hereby granted by the Protection Division for commencement of construction with the following conditions: Letter to Mr. John Larkin December 16, 1986 Page 2 (1) Construction of the actual structure is limited, at this time, to foundation work only and does not include nor is permission granted for the installation of interior plumbing either above or below grade. (Please note, interior plumbing is defined to include waste and water piping beginning 3 feet outside of the foundation wall and extending into the building.) (2) Permission for foundation construction does not include authorization for the installation of the exterior sewer and water line services to the building. No exterior sewer and water lines are authorized for installation until the Permit has been issued by the Protection Division. (3) This letter authorizing foundation construction does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission #4 and the City of South Burlington prior to construction. Upon receipt of the above items, we shall continue our review. Should there be any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Mary K. Clark Assistant Regional Engineer CC: Krebs s Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. R. G. Blanchard City of South Burlington, Katherine Vose PFJ • KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. 199 MAIN STREET, WINOOSKI, VERMONT 655-3640 December 18, 1987 Jane Lafleur City of South Burlington Planner Municipal Office 525 Dorset Street South Burlington, 'Vermont 05403 Re: Lot 9 - Larkin Realty Harbor View Road, South Burlington Dear Jane: Please find enclosed two sets of revised plans for the above mentioned project. We have incorporated the stipulations of the final plat approval. The plans include all revisions suggested by Bill Szymanski. We are looking to record these plans with the City as soon as possible. Please call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, William H. Nedde III WHN/dz enclosures (2) Civil and Sanitary Engineering 0 Surveying 0 Land Development and Subdivisions City of South Burlint;to n 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658.7955 January 4, 1988 John Larkin Larkin Realty 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Larkin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you Have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Jane B . Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encl FINDINGS OF FACT STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of John Larkin for construction of a 20,000 square foot office building, lot #9, Harbor View Road. On the 1st of December 1987, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the request of John Larkin for site plan approval under Section 19.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations based on the following findings: 1) TRAFFIC ACCESS: Access is adequate as proposed from a 30 foot wide curb cut on Harbor View Road. 2) CIRCULATION AND PARKING: Circulation is available around the parking lot to the eastern end of the building. Sixty four parking spaces are approved; sixteen or 20% are waived. 3) LANDSCAPING & SCREENING: A $14,500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. 4) OTHER: A sewer allocation of 1000 gpd is granted and the $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. A $1463 intersection improvement fee shall be paid prior to permit. The water line to the hydrant shall be 8 inches. It shall include a 15 foot easement dedicated to the City. The line shall be a City line and legal documents filed with the City Attorney prior to permit. A shut off valve on the line shall serve the building. The connection shall be submitted to the Water Department for approval prior to permit. The sewer connection shall be at the manhole unless an alternate location is approved by the City Engineer. The curbs along the north side of the parking lot shall be curved not sawtoothed to facilitate snow plowing. The erosion control recommendations of Heindel & Noyse shall be implemented. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission 1 4+~t04 TOWN PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 December 11, 1987 John Larkin Larkin Realty 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Lot #9, Harbor View Dear Mr. Larkin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the minutes of the December 1, 1987 Planning Commission meeting at which your site plan was approved. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ja4tl. Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encl cc: Susan Dimmick Graham Goldsmith Architects David Spitz PLANNING COMMISSION 1 DECF.i1BER 19187 page 4 The Plannina Commission recognizes this segment of Williston Rd. as a hiah traffic location. The Commission reels TENT every at-Cempt should bema to mana a access in order to reduce acclaen s,- 9 duce delays a._npreven or delay the premature o so escenae o e roan'. it is TargelX reco ized that most effective ec qu s or managing access are: 1-2 To-=mit the number of conflict points imi n e e urns o a few select locations an regu a ng e maximum width of driveways; o separate basic con -MI -ET areas by regui&ting the max mum number or driveways per property, con- solidatinaaccess with adjacent ro er es and re-orien ng access o side streets a are served by s gna ize n ersec ions. The Planning Commission endorses these methods and holds access management as a oal ex�re_s_se in the 1985 Southur ing on om- re e ive Plan ameliorate existing problems, provide ror u ure row and mainE_a1_n_s_aTety and adequate eve s o service. page - n light of this goal the Commission findsthat: a) The two Williston Road driveways shown on the plan will not ad- ee uatel revent or discourage left turns sincethey are not sur-"- icien ang-led and are too wide, measur n,) reet at the ang e anfeet at the property line. The South Burlington Zoning regulations allow one driveway per IoF. kSection 19.122aL b The projected number of peak hour trip ends as presented in the traffic studz by Northoun r annin avi Spitz letter ) is between Y2 an is high traffic use will serious y affect i�Fe o operation of the ne-a-r-e-sf7ntersection byinterrupting tearric flow at a distance of approximately 4U reetfrom the intersection. This interrupTion affects e safety and welfare of the citizeHsof S. Burlington and the vehicles and pedestrians on the roa . Furthermore in that the PlanninaCommission is attempting to plan or a possible future City Street to the east or west of this par- cel o serve future development on the proper to the south, e Planning Commission requested tha the - tan s ow a future access to THe--east and west ro er ies or how such an access might e accom- mo a e on e site. The plans show no such access. ere ore, e plans are inadequate and incomplete. The South Burlington Planning Commission hereby denies the plan. Mrs. Maher seconded. The motion l'o deny passed unanimously. 3. Site Plan apl2lication of John Larkin for approval of a 20,000 sq. fF._7777ce buildina. lot #9. Mar or View Rd Isite plan expired February 5, 1987) SueeDimmick noted the objections of the Agency of Natural Resources have been withdrawn and the Act 250 permit is now being issued. There are only minor changes to the plan: the parking has been pulled away from the top of the bank and there has been a slight change in curbcuts. PLANNING i1u, UO".L IN 1 DECEMBER 1987 page 5 Mrs. Hurd moved that the Plann a2211cation 01 John LarKin for office building on lot #9, NaF of plans entitled "Site Plan, View Road - lot 9, Southur i Lansing Engineers. last revise stipulations: ng Commission approve the site pl construction off' a `ZU,Uuu sq. ". or View Road a8 deDicted on a set ce builaing, n, vermont,, prepare wi e o 1. A $14 5j00 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit'. 2. The Planning Commission approves 64 parking spaces. Sixteen' 779) are waived. 3. The water line to the hydrant shall be 8 inches. The line shall include a'T5--:Foot easement a ica e o the City. The jin shall e a City line and lega documents f-17_e7 with e City orne rior to ermit. A shut off valve on the line shall -ery e buiidinz. The connection shall e submitted to e a e- Ue—partment for approval prio to permit. r, 4. The sewer connection should be at the manhole unless an a-' erna e oca ion s approved by the City Engineer. 5. The curb along the north side of the parking lot shall be curvea insteaa of saw-tootnea to iacilitate snow plowing. 6. The buildingpermit shall be obtained within 6 months or thl approval is nuand void. Mrs:: iMahei, , second6d. ahti- the.aaotion._.,passed -,unanimously. f; 4. Site Plan application of Ken Smith for construction of a'T2 sq. ft. builaing for contractors business, lot #8, 81 Ethan &14 Drive'Al .Mr. Belter stepped down during discussion of this site plan.,* R Mr. Fitzpatrick explained that the land drops away slig y from - Ethan Allen Drive. The building will be 60' x 20' and will'.�Oul, construction supplies. There will be overhead doors on the sid, and back. The water will come from the main on Ethan Allen Dri and they have allowed for sewage to go out back when that area4- developed. Parking was altered to allow for the Fire Chief's r1 quest for 30-foot lanes. The landscaping plan was considered.. intense, and Mrs. Lafleur asked for some landscaping on the sou' side to hide equipment. The applicant agreed to do this. A';:^.`a Belter asked what would be stored outside. Mr. Smith said -theX'1 would be pick-up trucks but no backhoes and no construction materials at all. Mr. Smith said they could hook onto the Pew; road whin that is built. Mrs. Lafleur said she would rather sg, that area landscaped now and then made into a driveway when the` road is in. The applicant will submit a revised landscapin plan and will put trees in back for a buffer. r 11/30/87 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of John Larkin for construction of a 20,000 square foot office building on lot #9, Harbor View Road as depicted on a set of plans entitled "Site Plan, Proposed Office Building, Harbor View Road - lot 9, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Krebs and Lansing Engineers, last revised 11/23/87, with the following stipulations: 1. A $14,500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. 2. The Planning Commission approves 64 parking spaces. Sixteen (20%) are waived. 3. The water line to the hydrant shall be 8 inches. The line shall include a 15 foot easement dedicated to the City. The line shall be a City line and legal documents filed with the City Attorney prior to permit. A shut off valve on the line shall serve the building. The connection shall be submitted to the Water Department for approval prior to permit. 4. The sewer connection should be at the manhole unless an alternate location is approved by the City Engineer. 5. The curb along the north side of the parking lot shall be curved instead of saw toothed to facilitate snow plowing. 6. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. 2 Memornndu-- - Planning November 25, 1987 Page 2 Traffic: The half acre lot is permitted 9 trip ends under the traffic overlay zone. The use will generate 165 to 72 trip ends using David Spitz previous traffic study which are based on VAOT data at the high side and ITE estimates on the low side. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. 3) LARKIN, LOT #9, HARBOR VIEW ROAD John Larkin proposes to construct a 20,000 square foot office building on the 1.658 acre property located on the northern side of Harbor View Road, just south of the brook. This project was approved by the Planning Commission in 1985, extended in 1986 and has since expired due to Act 250 complications which have finally been resolved. The Planning Commission must review this from scratch since the plans have completely expired. Access: Access is proposed from a 30 foot wide curb cut on Harbor View Road. Circulation: Circulation is available around the parking lot to the eastern end of the building. Parking: The 20,000 square foot building requires 80 spaces. Sixty four are shown on the plans. In the earlier approval the Planning Commission approved 62 spaces or a 23% waiver. 4, S e.Ge<) �`��.W0.� ► Landscaping: The building requires $14,500 in new landscaping. The plans show pine, yews, hemlock, oak, juniper and others valued above this amount. Traffic: The 1.658 acre site allows 81 trip ends. Under ITE estimates, 57 trip ends will be generated. David Spitz is conducting a 15 hour count at the Harbor View/Route 7 inter- section to determine whether a signal is required. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. i M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: James Goddette, Fire Chief Re: December 1, 1987 agenda items Date: November 25, 1987 3) LARKIN, LOT 9, HARBOR VIEW ROAD, OFFICE BUILDING Plans reviewed and at this time I do not see a problem with this project. 4) KENNETH P. SMITH, LOT 8, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE Plans reviewed and the only correction I see needed is on the east side of building. A 30' area is needed for setting up fire equipment. It must be 30 feet along the entire length of the building. 5) REILLY TIRE COMPANY PROPERTY, (MEDICAL CENTER), 620 HINESBURG Plans reviewed and only problem I see at this time is main aisles in front of building on the Hinesburg Road side must be 30' wide. 1 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: December 1, 1987 agenda items Date: November 25, 1987 2) MOB_I_L CORPORATION, WILLISTON ROAD 1. Just completed curb and sidewalk work along Williston Road should not be disturbed. Plan shows two 5 foot curb radii changed to 15 foot. This change will not discourage left turns and is not worth removal of new paving and resulting in a patch. 2. Plan is a significant improvement over what presently exists on the site. 3) OFFICE BUILDING, HARBOR VIEW ROAD 1. Water line to hydrant should be 8 inch. This line should include a 15' easement and be a City line. There should be a shut off valve on the line serving the building. This connection shall be reviewed also by the City Water Department. 2. The sewer connection should be at the manhole unless there is a grade problem. 3. The curb along the north side of the parking lot should be curved instead of the saw teeth to facilitate snow plowing. 4) KENNE_TH. P. SMITH ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE. 1. The proposed building should be planned to tie into the municipal sewer system to the rear (south) when that road and sewer system is constructed. This would eliminate the need for the pumping station. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 November 25, 1987 John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Lot #9, Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Larkin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission. Also enclosed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. Please be sure somone is present on Tuesday, December 1, 1987 to represent your request. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls cc: Susan Dimmick Graham Goldsmith Architects David Spitz i5 Ct Planting -,..Schedule -- Plant Name Alumber size Red Oak 8 2" - 2 112" compact Pfilzer 30 I / gallon Juniper Day L/lys Y/i'(' `% v v Vii \q) Dwarf Snow 2'- 3 Mound Spirea Dwarf Gold 2 - 3 Flame Spirea LOt /O Temporary Bench Mork 98 P. K. nail set in /O p Mop/e PLANTING SCHEDULE - TOP OF BANK AT L+C7V PLANT NAME NO. SIZE RE ARKS White Pine/Pinus Strobus 10 8-7' B&B Canadian Yow/Taxus Canadensis , 00 12 -18" Bare Rt. Transplts. Hemlo.k/Tsuga Caua4onsis 11 3-4' Container or B&B Red &/orGrey Stem Dogwood 31 2-3° Container Comus Spp. . )1,90 Compact Piitzer or Hetz juniper juniperus Spp. Ilk 44� of baAk- c ' 4- •� + + j O 1� + 127 1 gal. Container F, 1, " 117- 0 1 4 M E M 0 TO: Planning Commission FROM: William Szymanski, City Manager RE: Agenda Items for 6/12/84 DATE: June 8, 1984 3) Scottish Rite Temple, Kimball Ave. 1. The proposed walkway to the north parking area infringes upon conservation zone and may require extensive filling to provide an acceptable walking slope. 5) Office Building #9, Bay View Dr. I. The parking lot storm drain should outlet to the north instead of the street which will necessitate disturbing the new sidewalk. 2. The curved parking spaces will be difficult to enter into especially large cars. 3. The Bartletts Bay sewage treatment plant is fully committed. There is no reserve. Proposals for expanding the plant by 100,000 gpd are being solicited from area consultants. These proposals are due June 22, 1984. 6) Celani Office Building, 22 Patchen Road I. Method of handling storm water runoff should be shown. Also north arrow. 2. A connecting drive to the commercial property to the south would be a benefit. J a*- t � fo g �}- 4�L flliL � k�-n� q in �d� Q . l J l.o�t 3 f ca p C,-K roof a� ccan.o c4.Azt�,L alp ( if k_DGA,� C�_� dt&ka Kol tD 44s, cam, .s(&� ea,r\, Uav--P,- )GI CcYI <,�'n ��c��U l� sYwccO �A) "J-cxwfi mw�o + 5) Fw v A", Cire cl�u.� �lktFicchn.�' tiro 6) ��Q ?" � c,\ �� 39� 4o �,cpV, in CDC 5b ;YDa An 0 1 AA Ww\�,Wm 'Y*'000sje,(9 -?— tA60sc"( 0-7 PO � O as R'`' , 644 na,�. ? �/� co CD L5 eg - p (Aw 00 '\J ti,oc �ur N) Ac, C cc-44 XL q 1C_1L r4a Cq 1, C iA d7 Nart MOWED OrC6Ct' ezOb, C�c Zz Aj v� C L) LRII ki �W\ llx4akt" Ole.— LL-7� "SC)CD � r-Arm Tmnm %UILI-i ()o C,%f 6- czl DW 4/27/84 MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission grant site plan approval for the application of Ronald Muir for conversion of an existing duplex into an office complex containing 2016 square feet at 31-33 Patchen Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "Plat Plan for Ronald Muir", dated April 17, 1984 prepared by Palmer Company, Ltd., with the following stipulations: 1) That a landscaping bond in the amount of $500.00 and a bond for curb work in the amount of $700 be posted prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 2) That the sewer allocation be reduced to 250 g.p.d. in accordance with the sewer policy developed by the Planning Commission. 3) This approval shall expire in 6 months. No Text KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 199 Main St. WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404 L IEUT a Dr�i OF (802) 655-3640 TO U M ' _ 1 Ze Z n DATE it •z� �7 JOB NO. ?-I►3`� ATTENTION WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings 4'Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 6C" 5 rE,l Z-2/ 3 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: /� For approval " ElApproved as submitted ElResubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO ` I:I SIGNED: EJ (( l PRODUCT 240-2 COS I., Gdw, Mast 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF SOUTH BURLI N(;TON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #)®�tg� Qe�'l�t\� 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: \ 5) LOT NUMBER (a f a p p 1 i c a b 1 e 6) PROPOSED USE (S) 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, it units, maximum height, and # floors, square feet per floor)----. 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES `�sZ �N� lj G"� 9) LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas -__—% building, parking., outside storage______% 10) COST I:S'IIMA'1'ES: Buildings 'D Landscaping S._�L-}�.5- � Other S i to Improvements ( p.lease 1..ist. wi t.h cost) I ) t;S'1' I MATED PROJ ECT C,0MNL.ET 1 ON 1)ATF:: 12) EST 1 MA' FI) AVE.RAGE 1)A 1.1,1 T'RAF F I ( (in and out.) ��c:_. V'Q F:�;tirmttt�d trip ands (in and out during, the followirt, throulrh Friday 1-12' noon 1-2 p.m. p.m. :{-•I 5-6 p.m. ! a) Pl-. \I; Il()I!I .S O I i ) I'F.Ak 1)A1 1; r)1• OIIF:I2 \'I' 1 ON, I):\'I I- ttI- �)i'1011l ti ION I):\'! k I• 11i :\I; I t: �:•I I ��� \'I'( I% 1,: ()I-' 11111. ► t ., 1, ti PLEASE SUBMIT FOUR COPIES OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible.) Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. ( This requires separate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet. by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces) Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parkins and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot #). North arrow. Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 John M. Race, Chic,/ Telephone (802) 658-1050 May 27, 1987 Susan Dimick Larkin Realty 1185 Shelburne Road So. Burlington; VT 05403 Dear Ms. Dimick: I have reviewed the revised site plan for the proposed office building on Lot 9., Harbor View Road and have no objection to this project at this time. The project would not create an undue burden of the city services rendered by this department. Sincer ly, ;ohn M. Race hief of Police JMR:mc FINDINGS OF FACT STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of John Larkin for construction of a 20,000 square foot office building on lot *9, Harbor View Road. On the 5th of August 1986, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the request of R.G. Blanchard, agent for John Larkin for site plan approval under Section 19.10 of the South Burlington Regulations based on the following findings: 1. TRAFFIC ACCESS: Access is shown from Harbor View Road. 2. CIRCULATION AND PARKING: Circulation is adequate, 62 parking spaces are approved; 13 are compact car size. The area designated for 18 future parking spaces shall be left undisturbed subject to the right of the Commission to require it for parking. A bond shall be posted prior to permit in an amount determined by the City Engineer. 3. LANDSCAPING & SCREENING: An $11,000 bond for landscaping and a $20,000 bond for sewer, water and storm drain improvements shall be posted prior to permit. Erosion control methods as required by Wagner, Heindel and Noyse shall be implemented. A sewer allocation of 1000 gpd is made and $2.50 per gallon shall be paid prior to permit. A $1493 contribution to the intersection improvement fund shall be paid prior to permit. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. South Burlington Planning Commission §�vutb Nurliugtvu 9Rire Departincut 575 i9nrset �trert �§vurlij 13urlintiton, 1lerilloos ":"j. — OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658.7960 May 8,1987 Mr. John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Larkin, Plans have been reviewed by the fire department on the proposed office building that you wish to build on Harbor View Road in South Burlington. At this time I am pleased to inform you that with the changes made on the road way in the parking lot for fire equipment I do not see a problem with this project. I would like to thank you for your cooperation in trying to make South Burlington a safe community to work in. If you have any questions pease feel free to call me. Sincerely ames W. Goddette Sr. Chief PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 May 8, 1987 Geoff Greene AEC 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Larkin Office, Lot #9, Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Greene: This letter serves to confirm that the City of South Burlington approved the plans for a 20,000 square foot office building on lot #9, Harbor View Road. This project is in conformance with the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. The City made a sewer allocation of 10,000 gallons per day to serve this development. There is adequate capacity at the Bartlett's Bay Treatment Plant to handle this amount. There is also adequate water to serve this facility. I hope this is helpful. Please call me if you have any questions. Larkin Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner LTH Associates John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Rd. S. Burlington, VT 05403 Geoffrey W. Green Assistant Dist. Coordinator Dist. #4 Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Re: Proposed Office Building, #4C0526-5 Dear Geof We are writing to request a supplemental hearing on the above referenced project. We are making this request so that we may present additional. information regarding the conditions proposed in your recess memo dated May 7, 1987. Enclosed are brief descriptiions of our proposals from our engineers. Please feel free to call if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Susan Dimick LTH Associates LTH Associates John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Rd. S. Burlington, VT 05403 Geoffrey W. Green Assistant Dist. Coordinator Dist. #4 Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Re: Proposed Office Building, #4C0526-5 Dear Geof We are writing to request a supplemental hearing on the above referenced project. We are making this request so that we may present additional information regarding the conditions proposed in your recess memo dated May 7, 1987. Enclosed are brief descriptiions of our proposals from our engineers. Please feel free to call if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Susan Dimick LTH Associates May 28, 1987 Doherty Consulting Engineers 20 South Willard Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 864-6717 Harborview Office Building South Burlington, Vermont CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES 1. Sheet Piling Sheet piling shall be United States Steel PMA22 interlocking steel piles, 12 to 14 feet in length. 2. Construction Procedure a. Lay out the four corners of the building. b. Drive interlocking sheet piling along the north side, and along the west side as far south as necessary for protection of the bank. c. Sheet piling shall be driven to a depth of 10 feet. d. Excavate on the inside of the piling to the specified depth for construction of the foundation wall footings, approximately 5 feet below existing ground surface. e. Ground on the outside of the piling, toward the bank, will remain undisturbed. Cast excavated soil to the inside of the building. f. Construct the wall footing and foundation wall as will be shown on the structural drawings. Footing: 2 feet by 10 inches; Wall: 8 inches thick, reinforced concrete. g. Install foundation drain as shown on the architectural drawings. h. Backfill the foundation wall with compacted soil on the outside, and with compacted gravel on the inside. i. Remove the sheet piling. j. Construct the remaining foundation wall in the conventional manner. k. Complete construction of the building. 3. Erosion Control a. In addition to erosion control procedures specified on the Site Plans, protect the toe of slope of excavated soils stockpiled on the jobsite with haybale dikes. b. Additional procedures are not required. Richard M. Doherty, P.E. Ri, RICHARD M. DOHERTY NO. 3561 \SS70NAt E�� USS Steel Sheet Piling Dhv. Weight Section Modulus Area Moment of Inertia Profile Desi nation � Astrid Rolled inQ Dis- t,nq Thick- Hess Per Per Square Per Per Foot Per Per Per foot p Foot Foot Pile of Pile Pile of Pile of wall wall wall In. lbs. Lbs. In. In.+ In.+ In.+ In.' In.' r+h�+ w PSX32 H. 16�i 44.0 32.0 ZOA4 3.3 2.4 12.94 5.1 3.7 ` PS32' H.S. 15 40.0 32.0 �i 2.4 1.9 11.77 3.6 2.9 '• CU "' PS28 H.S. 15 35.0 28.0 Ya 2.4 1.9 10.30 3.5 2.8 u s PSA28' H. 16 37.3 28.0 Y4 3.3 2.5 10.98 6.0 4.5 o PSA23 H.S. 16 30.7 23.0 % 3.2 2.4 8.99 5.5 4.1 PDA 27 H.S. 16 36.0 27.0 '/a 14.3 10.7 10.59 53.0 39.8 x N. �+' c >PMA22 H.S. 19% 36.0 22.0 '/s 8.8 5.4 10.59 22.4 13.1 yt' �00 d N 12' GO PZ38 H. 18 57.0 38.0 % 70.2 46.8 16.77 421.2 290.8 M L N ♦+ Q 4 f • 8 L PZ32 H. 21 56.0 32.0 67.0 38.3 16.47 385.7 220.4 ¢ oo . d N 12' PZ 27 H. 18 40.5 27.0 '/1 45.3 30.2 11.91 276.3 184.2 cd3- 0 'Sections PS32 and PSA 28 are infre- quently rolled and we do not advise their use in a design unless an adequate ton- nage can be ordered at one time to assure a minimum rolling. Complete data regarding these sections will be found in a separate publication entitled "USS Steel Sheet Piling." H-Homestead, Pa. (Eastern Steel Division) S-South Chicago (Central Steel Division) Suggested Allowable Design Stresses -Sheet Piling Minimum Yield Allowable Design Stress, Steel Brand or Grade Pant, psi psi• ASTM A328 38,500 25,000 ASTM A572 GR 50 (USS EX -TEN 50) 50,000 32,000 ASTM A690 (USS MARINER GRADE) 50,000 32,000 'Based on 65% of minimum yield point. Some increase for temporary overstresses generally permissible. Q to V 0 May 28, 1987 Doherty Consulting Engineers 20 South Willard Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 864-6717 harborview Office Building S South Bur ington, Vermont CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES 1. Sheet Piling Sheet piling shall be United States Steel PMA22 interlocking steel piles, 12 to 14 feet in length. 2. Construction Procedure a. Lay out the four corners of the building. b. Drive interlocking sheet piling along the north side, and along the west side as far south as necessary for protection of the bank. c. Sheet piling shall be driven to a depth of 10 feet. d. Excavate on the inside of the piling to the specified depth for construction of the foundation wall footings, approximately 5 feet below existing ground surface. e. Ground on the outside of the piling, toward the bank, will remain undisturbed. Cast excavated soil to the inside of the building. f. Construct the wall footing and foundation wall as will be shown on the structural drawings. Footing: 2 feet by 10 inches; Wall: 8 inches thick, reinforced concrete. g. Install foundation drain as shown on the architectural drawings. h. Backfill the foundation wall with compacted soil on the outside, and with compacted gravel on the inside. i. Remove the sheet piling. j. Construct the remaining foundation wall in the conventional manner. k. Complete construction of the building. 3. Erosion Control a. In addition to erosion control procedures specified on the Site Plans, protect the toe of slope of excavated soils stockpiled on the jobsite with haybale dikes. b. Additional procedures are not required. Richard M. Doherty, P.E. l �~P` vyr\ RICHARD M. DOHERTY NO. 3561 �S10NAl. ENV USS Steel Sheet Piling Driv- Weight Section Modulus Area Moment of Inertia Profile Designation District Rolled inQ Dis- WeD Thick non Per Per Square Per Per Foot Per Per Per Foot p Foot Foot Pill of Pill Pile of pile of Wall Wall Will In. lbs. Lbs. In. In.' In.' In.' In.' In.• PSX32 H. 16yi 44.0 32.0 29/64 3.3 2.4 12.94 5.1 3.7 •3 PS32' H.S. 15 40.0 32.0 yi 2.4 1.9 11.77 3.6 2.9 `� E `5 PS28 N.S. 15 35.0 28.0 % 2.4 1.9 10.30 3.5 2.8 T � y PSA 28' H. 16 37.3 28.0 y2 3.3 2.5 10.98 6.0 4.5 y o ,5 PSA 23 H.S. 16 30.7 23.0 % 3.2 2.4 8.99 5.5 4.1 PDA27 H.S. 16 36.0 27.0 % 14.3 10.7 10.59 53.0 39.8 x - ' " 3'h'/i c >PMA22 H.S. 19s/e 36.0 22.0 % 8.8 5.4 10.59 22.4 13.7 iL 00 y N 12' a PZ38 H. 18 57.0 38.0 % 70.2 46.8 16.77 421.2 290.8 M L N .- a . 3N x �9 PZ32 H. 21 56.0 32.0 '/e 67.0 38.3 16.47 385.7 220.4 w M yo N t c 1z•�� PZ27 H. 18 40.5 27.0 1/1 45.3 30.2 11.91 276.3 184.2 w r0 C 'Sections PS32 and PSA28 are infre- quently rolled and we do not advise their use in a design unless an adequate ton- nage can be ordered at one time to assure a minimum rolling. Complete data regarding these sections will be found in a separate publication entitled "USS Steel Sheet Piling." H-Homestead, Pa. (Eastern Steel Division) S-South Chicago (Central Steel Division) Suggested Allowable Design Stresses -Sheet Piling Minimum Yield Allowable Design Stress, Steel Brand or Grade Pant, psi psi• ASTM A328 38,500 25,000 ASTM A572 GR 50 (USS EX -TEN 50) 50,000 32,000 ASTM A690 (USS MARINER GRADE) 50,000 32,000 'Based on 6596 of minimum yield point. Some increase for temporary overstresses generally permissible. 0 11 O , KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING �� 199 MAIN STREET, WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404 ENGINEERS, INC. 655-3640 May 28, 1987 Mr. Geoffrey W. Green Assistant District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Lot #9, Bartletts Commercial Subdivision Application #4C0526-5 Dear Mr. Green: Please find enclosed a revised site plan for the above mentioned project. The top of bank was established from a topographic survey of this project and added to the drawing. The building is presently located at its maximum distance from the top of the bank (at the 40' setback line from Harbor View Road). The limits of parking was kept approximately 5' from the top of bank and at least 50' from the center line of the brook. (Conservation District) The erosion control measures for this project include a snow fence, hay bale erosion barrier and silt fence continuously along the west, north and east side of this project. The snow fence will be placed on the inside of the hay bales and silt fence to act as a construction limit and a barrier protect the erosion control measures. Both hay bales and silt fences are very effective sediment traps. Hay bales tend to slow down the flow of water, allowing solids/sediment to settle out. Silt fences filter sediment out with special construction fabrics. The width of 2 hay bales is approximately 31feet, therefore it would require approximately 5' between construction limits and the top of bank to install this system. If the foundation of the building was to be constructed by using the sheet piling system, I see no problem in establishing this erosion control system and protecting the brook and its bank. It is proposed to stabilize the existing naturally eroding banks by using matting, or fabric. These help retain the soil to allow roots and vegetation to establish and later naturally stabilize the bank. All disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched to deter erosion. Civil and Sanitary Engineering Surveying Land Development and Subdivisions Mr. Geoffrey W. Green May 28, 1987 Page 2 Another important aspect of erosion control is field inspection. The engineer will be responsible for location and proper installation of the erosion control system. The engineer will inspect erosion control measures weekly to insure the system is properly maintained. Given the erosion control system designed and adding the matting/fabric to stabilize the existing eroding bank, we not only will certify that the measures specified will protect bank and brook but will actually improve the conditions of the site. The commissions concerns over the protection of the bank and brook are very valid especially after the original site plan that was submitted. A lot of lessons were learned from that situation. This site plan is a realistic construction document allowing for the maximum usage of a lot along with complete protection and improvement of conditions of the brook and its bank. Please call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, VA-V4 - William H. Nedde, III WHN/eb Tel. 828-3309 LAF,mm, Lit -*9 , } 66r 1/%" Rd State Office Building Montpelier, Vermont 05602 STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # December 3, 1986 Mr. John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 RE: Application #4C0526-5, 20,000 Square Foot Office Building on Lot #9 of the Bartlett Subdivision Dear Mr. Larkin: Upon review of your recently submitted application for the above reference project, I find that the application cannot be accepted as complete until the following information has been submitted: 1. A project grading plan which shows site contours before and after construction. This grading plan should include a site specific soil erosion control plan which shows the location of both temporary and permanent erosion control measures. 2. Clarification as to whether or not the parking lot curb cut on Harbor View Road already exists. Also evidence that the Town has approved this curb cut should be provided. 3. Elevations of the proposed building from various perspectives. 4. Locations and types of fixtures of all exterior lighting both freestanding and on the building. 5. Location of gas service line on the utilities plan as requested by the gas company. 6. Documentation that the building with all site improvements can be constructed for $20 per square foot. If such documentation cannot be provided, a revised construction cost estimate should be included with a revised fee based on $2 per $1,000 of estimated construction cost. Upon receipt of the above this application will be deemed complete and the application review process will commence. Please call me at 828-3309 if you have any questions. Mr. John Larkin December 3, 1986 page 2 This is an Advisory Opinion to the Executive Officer of the 3(C). Any such appeal should be Executive Officer, State Office January 3, 1986. kgr and as such, may be appealed by you Environmental Board pursuant to Rule filed to the Environmental Board, Building, Montpelier, Vermont 05602 by Sincerely, J Peter B. Meyer Chief Environmental Board District Coordinator August 14, 1986 John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Harbor View Road, Lot #9 Dear John: Enclosed are the August 5, 1986 minutes. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBBL/mcp Encl cc: Robert Blancharad Robert Krebs AAugust 8, 1986 Katherine Vose AEC 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Larkin Office, Harbor View Road Dear Katherine: This letter serves to confirm that the 20,000 square foot office building on Harbor View Road received Planning Commission approval on August 5, 1986. This project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan of South Burlington. A sewer allocation of 1000 gallons per day was allocated to this project. There is adequate capacity at the Bartletts Bay Treatment Plant to handle this. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp cc: Robert Blanchard 10/21/85 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission grant approval for the Site Plan Application of R.G. Blanchard for construction of a 20,000 square foot, 2 2 story office structure on lot #9, Harbor View Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan and Profile - Proposed Office Building for Larkin Real Estate" prepared by R.G. Blanchard, Design Associates, dated 5/22/84 and last revised 9/17/85 with the following stipulations: 1) Bonding for landscaping ($11,000) and site improvements (sewer, water, storm drain, $20,000) shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 2) That 62 parking spaces shall be provided with thirteen parking spaces at compact car size (82' x 16'), and space for the remain- ing 18 spaces shall remain undisturbed, subject to the right of the Planning Commission to require that the parking spaces be paved and used for parking. 3) That the applicant shall comply with the recommendations of Wagner, Heindel and Noyes for erosion control and storm water detention. 4) That a snow fence be erected in the CO area and where any exist- ing vegetation is to be saved. 5) That a sewer allocation of 1,000 gpd be made in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy. 6) The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. -DRIA�-_ t'4)07-10 M S 9/24/84 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised site plan application of R.G. Blanchard for construction of a 20,000 square foot, 21-, story office structure on lot #9, Harbor View Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan and Profile - proposed Office Building for Larkin Real Estate" prepared by R.G. Blanchard, Design Associates, revised for fire access on September 17, 1984 with the following stipulations: 1. All stipulations in the June 19, 1984 approval are still in effect. 2. This approval expires,,6 months from the original June 19, 1984 approval. 6/18/84 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission grant approval of the Site Plan application of R.G. Blanchard for construction of a 20,000 square foot,22 story office structure on Lot #9, Harbor View Road as shown on a plan entitled "Site Plan and Profile -Proposed Office Building for Larkin Real Estate" prepared by R.G. Blanchard, Design Associates, dated 5/22/84 and revised 6/12/84 with the following stipulations: 1) Bonding for landscaping ($11,000) and site improvements (sewer water, storm drain $20,000) shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. lr�') 2) That e�_q-h'ty parking spaces shall be provided with thirteen parking spaces at compact car size (82' x 161). 3) That an erosion control plan be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer and Planner for approval. 4) That a snow fence be erected in the CO area and where any existing vegetation is to be saved. 5) That a sewer allocation of 1000 gpd be made in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy. 6) That this approval expires in 6 months. �0aLUe. �i3c►r.l.�.-�-{',.1,`:�C'z'nL1:: � v �C��GI(.eo 6/8/84 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission grant approval of the Site Plan application of R.G. Blanchard for construction of a 20,000 sq. ft., 22 story office structure on Lot #9, Harbor View Road as shown on a plan entitled "'Site Plan and Profile -Proposed Office Building for Larkin Real Estate" prepared by R.G. Blanchard, Design Associates, dated 5/22/84 with the following stipulations: 1). Bonding for landscaping ($11,000) and site improvements ($20,000) shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit, and a revised landscaping plan will be submitted to the Planner prior to permit. 2). Eighty parking spaces shall be provided with eleven parking spaces at compact car size (82' x 16'). Handicapped spaces will be revised to meet the City Planners approval. 3). That an erosion control plan be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer and Planner for approval. 4). That a snow fence be erected in the CO area and where any existing vegetation is to be saved. 5). That a sewer allocation of 1000 gpd be made in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy. 6). That this approval expires in 6 months. 7, Date Received v`? of Lay Date Application Completed and Received By By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVI9V 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record 1,Alzglx, A( , 657dT6 (b) Applicant �. ei- .a �� � 51�,� 41 30c� (c) Contact Person 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Z47T 3) PROPOSED USE (S) : Df JG 6 S 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., # of units, floor area, etc.) 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) �j' 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings (b) Landscaping 2 (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work)% 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE�2--2rT. ��(Q 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION nATE I t1krtIRE QV APPLICANT --^ cl w" NORM COUNTRY t PLANNING { John Larkin LTH ASSOCIATES, INC. 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear John, 15 Morse Drive Essex Jct., Vermont 05452 (802) 878-0305 May 11, 1987 In response to a request from your office, I would like to clarify traffic volume estimates from my September 8, 1986 report for the Harbor View Office Building. Through the date of that report, approvals had been granted for 53 single-family and duplex units, 89 multi -family units, 3 mixed commercial buildings and a 200 room hotel and restaurant. Trip gen- eration estimates are as follows : TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES APPROVED DEVELOPMENT THROUGH SEPTEMBER, 1986 "BARTLETT PROPERTY" A.M. Peak Hour Enter 173 Exit 131 Total 304 P.M. Peak Hour Enter 162 Exit 161 Total 323 Average Weekday: 3484 In previous reports, I have estimated that 90% of commercial traffic, 50% of residential traffic and none of the hotel traffic will pass through the key Route 7/Harbor View Road intersection. Total current estimated traffic through this intersection is given in table 4 of the September, 1986 report. page 2 Trip generation estimates for the proposed office building are based on rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers. TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES PROPOSED LTH OFFICE BUILDING A.M. Peak Hour Enter 39 Exit 7 Total 46 P.M. Peak Hour Enter 7 Exit 37 Total 44 Average Weekday: 246 An estimated 90% of office traffic will pass through Route 7/Har- bor View Road intersection. I hope this information is sufficient to clarify any questions that have been raised. Sincerely, David H. Spitz North Country Planing • 15 Morse Drive * L;ssex Jet., W. i A' fi PLANNING COMMISSION 5, AUGUST 1986 PAGE 5 right-of-way is removed. The restriction on use of the rear lot shall be recorded as a deed restriction as approved by the City Attorney. . 6. It is the applicant's_ responsibility to record the final plat with the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plat must be approved � the City Planner and signed by the -Chairman or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. Ms. Peacock seconded,'and"the motion ap ssed'5-1 with Mrs. Hurd voting against. Mr. Dooley then moved to amend.the motion to removed the wording in the opening paragraph from "and 4 page set..." to "dated June 1986". Ms. Peacock seconded, and the motion passed 5-1, Mrs. Hurd opposing. 7. Continue site plan application of John Larkin for construction of a 20,000 sq. ft. office building on lot #9 of Bartlett Subdivision, Harbor View Rd. jjeview of erosion control report) The Wagner, Heindel & Noyes report indicates no retention necessar but they recommended some serious erosion control methods uch a haybales, fencing, swales, etc. Mrs. Maher felt that there should be some evergreens and that crabapple trees should be removed. Mr. Blanchard agreed to this. Mr. Larkin agreed to contribute to the intersection improvement fund. Mr. Dooley moved•that the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of R.G. B-lanchard, agent for John Larkin, for construction of a 20 000 ,sg_ -ft. 2-1 2' st --) office building on - lot 49, Harnor view"iRd, iA'dfpic-ted--on, plan entitled "Site Plan and Profile _ Proposed Office Building for Larkin Real Estate," prepared by R.G. Blanchard, Design Associates, revised on September 1—� 1984 with the following stipulations: 1. An 1$ 1,000 bond for landscaping and a $20,000 bond for sewer water and storm drain improvements shall be posted prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The Planning Commission approves 62 parking spaces; of these, 13 are compact car size. The area designated for 18 future spaces shall be left undisturbed and subject to the right of the Planning Commission to require that this area be paved or gravelled and used for parking,/ A bond shall be posted in an amount determined by.the City Engineer, for con- structicn of these at a later date. 3. A fence and hay bales shall be used along the entire and western edge of the site during the entire consc.w __,on period. Hay bales shall be placed in at least 2 locations within the small drainage swale to the west of the site. 4. Runoff from the roof of the building shall be directed to the sw"._ gust west of the property. A grassy swale shall be used ro yround slopes of less than 4% and a stone lined ditch f(-r slopes greater than 4%. Rip ram shall be sized and provided as needed in the drainage swale. 5. A contribution of $1,463 shall be made toward the Shalburi�e Rd. intersection improvement fund, based on the 57 trip ends generated � this office. 6. A sewer allocation of 1000 apd is made in accordance with the Bartlett �Bay Treatment Plant. The $2.50 per gallon charge shall be paid prior to hermit. '7. Sumped catch basins or other suitable means to remove pediment from stormwater runoff as approved by the City Engineer shall be provided. 8. The landscaping plan shall be amended, as approved �2y the City Planner, to substitute appropriate size evergreens for the crabapple trees currently provided. tf '. 1 9. The building ep rmit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Belter seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 8. Consider sketch plan application of Alan Gigure for a 2- lot subdivision With one existing house and a 6-unit multi- family building at 120 Airport Parkway Mrs. Lafleur reminded the Commission that a 4-lot subdivision has been approved and a city street required. Mr. Gigure does not want a city street, so he has a new sketch plan for a 6-unit building and the existing house. Mrs. Maher asked if this will be a condo development with covenants. Mr. Gigure said it would. Mrs. Lafleur noted that Mr. Szymanski is concerned with the common drive between single family and multi f_-.mily developments. She noted this is considered a major subdivision because it has multi -family dwellings. Mr. Dooley said he would like to know about the surrounding .neighborhood. Mrs. Maher said she felt a 6-family unit is August 1, 1986 John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Lot #9, Harbor View Road Dear John: Enclosed are the agenda and my memo regarding your expired site plan application. Please be sure someone is present on 'Tuesday, August 5, 1986 to represent your request. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls cc: Robert Blanchard -�)010 Kv-eb5 MI.:MO -J 111, N/1/86 Road itit Frr•sect.ion and the KimbaII and K(•nned\ I)riN , inYcrticct.ion. We may want to require the improvements needed as a resu 11. cif this development now, and a contr• i but. i on t,o :, t ra t' f i e i ml zio t: fund for future improvements as w(.> do on Shel1_>urne H,0ad. lleig h_l,__ The definition section of the 7.oni rig Ordi rtance, cl rari f i es Section 18.112 definition of height. The maximum height att.he tal lest point. is 35 feet:. The Mvrehant.s Bank requests ,al)provaI of 45 feet and will argue that the 3 criteria of Section 18.112b are met. 'They will also br.i.rig elevations to shop. the relationship of the bui.lding to existing buildings. The issues of.' the pedestrian trail. and landscaping have been resolved. See Bill's memo regarding the sidewalk. He would like it built at least to the new Kennedy Drive drivew,iy from Kimball Avenue. I wi..11 bring the O'Brien bank plan to the meetin.E� to review the> proposed connection of the two properties. The 24 foot wide road connection is located 20 feet from the northeast. corner of t.ho Merchant's Bank property. The grade to the O'Brien bank is quite steep; a connection between the two properties is lilioly to add a number of left turning vehicles onto Williston Road. This should be avoided. 6) BARNES, 27 MEADOW ROAD Enclosed is a memo from me regarding Spoke's opinion on the four - issues raised by the Commission. 7) LARK I N , LOT �9, HARBOR VIEW ROAD Several months ago Mr. Larkin requested an extension to the site plan approval for construction of a 20,000 square foot office• bui1d.ing on lot #9 of the Bartlett property. The Conunission postponed. action until. an erosion and runoff valuat.i.ori fr-onl Wagner-, Hei.ndel and Noyes was obtained. That. eva.luat.ion is enclosed. They recommend no detention due to the location of tht• site within the watershed. The only other new condition of approval will be the inter•section improvement fund contribution. The original memos and minutes are enclosed to describe the project to the new Planning Commis- sion members. f7M) ,5% AX /Do,00! _ �4 to i `iI- 2 4/8/86 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of R.G. Blanchard, agent for John Larkin for construction of a 20,000 square foot 2 1/2 story office budding on lot #9, Harbor View Road, as depicted on a plan entitled ''Site Plan and Profile ~ Proposed Office Building for Larkin Real Estate", prepared by R.G. Blanchard, Design Associates, revised on September 17, 1984 with the following stipulations,: 1) An $11,000 bond for landscaping and a $20,000 bond for sewer, water, and storm drain improvements shall be posted prior to issuance of a building permit. me �J /�5 ��.>�_ ottJ 1- ck 2) The Planning Commission approves 62 parking spaces; of these, 13 are compact car size. The area designated for 1.8 future spaces shall be left undisturbed and subject to the right of the Planning Commission to require that this area be, paved or gravelled and used for parking. A bond shall be posted in an amount determined by the City Engineer, for construction of these at a later date. 3) A silt fence and hay bales shall be used along the entire northern and western edge of the site during the entire construction period. Hay bale; shall be placed in at least 2 locations within the small drainage Swale to the west of the site. 4) Runoff from the roof of the building shall be directed to the Swale lust west of the property. A grassy Swale shall be used for ground slopes of less than 4% and a stone lined ditch for slopes greater than 4%. Rip rap shall be sized and provided as needed in the drainage Swale. 5) A contribution of $1.,463 shall be made toward the Shelburne Road intersection improvement fund, based on the 57 trip ends generated by this office. 6) A sewer allocation of It) 00 gpd is made in accordance with the Bartlett Bay Treatment Plat. The $2.50 per gallon charge shall be paid prior to permit. 7) The building permit shall, be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. C PLANNING COMMISSION 22 OCTOBER 1985 PAGE 2 Mrs. Lafleur advised that the final blacktopping of the toad was' -done a few days ago. The Chairman polled the Commission as to preference on main- tenance of the dry well, and the majority preferred that the City assume this responsibility. Mr. Dooley then moved that the Planning Commission approve the revised Final Plat of LTH Associates fox` the revision to Cluster D from 20 multi -family units to 7-Ingle-family lots as shown on the plans entitled "Final Plat: Bartlett Property" revised 9/3/85 and "Horizonte Layout: Bartlett Property" revised 9/3 85 prepared 12y rebs and Lansing Con- sulting Engineers, Inc'., with the folJowing stipulations: 1. The plan shall be rev'Jsed to e iminate any change to Cluster C. It shall remain as multi -family dwellings until a revised plan is approved. 2. The street named "Bay Court" shall be renamed not to conflict with the Bay Court -co dos. The name shall be approved by the City Planner. 3. All stipulations from the Final Plat approval of July 1-3 1985 shall remain in effect. 4. Prior to any building permits for its #44 to 150, the street trees shall be planted on the public streets and the final course of blacktop shall be installed. 5. The applicant shall install a dry well catch basin in the open space area to the west of the boundary of lots 49 and 50 as approved by the City Engineer. The catchTasin shall be maintained,b the City of South Burlington and' applicant shall rp o ide to the City an appropriate easement or right - of -ent y' for that purpose . 6. Th revised plan shall be recorded with the City Clerk wit n 90 days. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion which passed unanimously. 2) Consider expired site plan application of LTH Associates for 20,000 sq. ft. office building on lot #_ , Harbor View Rd. Members agreed that they would like the applicant to comply with recommendations of Wagner, Heindel & Noyes regarding storm water detention. 14r. Dooley moved that the site plan application be continued 3) PLANNING COMMISSION 22 OCTOBER 1985 PAGE 3 and that a study and recommendations be made j�y Wagner, Heindel & Noyes as to those changes necessary for erosion control and storm water detention. Mr. Burgess seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Consider site plan application of Gary Lacey for a 6900 sq. t. addition to existing building for warehouse use at 2000 WKliston Road. Mr. acey advised he has been filling in the back area for about a year and have gained about 50-60 feet. Most of the buildi will be on existing hard land. There was a problem with em oyee parking on the day the site was visited. The trucks weXe filling in and employee cars were parked on the lawn to ac ommodate the truckers. Mr. Lacey indicated the areas where\\employee cars will be parked in the future. Mrs. Maher as ed why there is no landscaping plan. Mrs. Lafleur said s e had been unable to get one from the developer. Her goncern is that given the size of the building, she felt,there should be adequate screening for neighbors. Mr. Dooley moved tha the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Gary Lacey for construction of a 6900 sq ft addition to the existing building at 2000 Williston Road as depictVd on a plan entitled "Lacey's, Inc., 2000 Williston Road, Soutt Burlington," dated 10/21/85 with the following sti ulations 1. A $1500 landscaping bond )hall be posted prior to permit. A detailed landscaping plan all be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to rmit showing $1500 worth of screening. \ 2. An area for employee parking sh 1 be designated along the edge of the bank on the north of th property. At least 20 regulation size parking spaces for em to ee parking shall be shown on the plan. 3. The building permit shall be obtained ithin 6 months. Mr. Burgess seconded d the motion which asseunanimously Consider site plan application for Rene Berard`f construction of a 3200 sg ft building for NETC L Fence Company on Lot #2 of the Belter Industrial Ethan Allen Drive. or stock bdivision Mr: Fitzpatrick explained that the lot abuts the flood plain City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 October 17, 1985 John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Cluster D. Revisions and reapplication for office on lot #9 Dear John: Enclosed are the agenda and pertinent memos to the Planning Commission. I talked with Bob Blanchard regarding the need for Wagner, Heindel & Noyse's opinion on the office. I will recommend that they stipulate it in the approval motion but of course it is up to them if they want the analysis up front. I expect to hear from Jeff Nelson this week regarding the location of the pond and the amount of detention. Sincerely, 1 v' q Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls cc: Bob Krebs Bob Blanchard M E M O R A N D U M N To: South Burlington Planning Commissions From: Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner` a Re: October 22, 1985 agenda items Date: 10/>>18/85 2) _LTH,-2EVISIONS TO CLUSTER D. As we discussed at the last meeting, Jefferey Nelson recommended detention of 7000-10,500 gallons to improve the conditions in the north fork of the brook and to conform with the Commission's policy of no increased peak discharge above the pre -development level. He recommended a site within the conservation zone as a possible location. According to the tax assessor, this land is all owned by Larkin. Most of it it heavily wooded with mature pines. If a suitable location for detention can not be found without distrubing these woods, I recommend that approval still be granted. The benefits of this revision seem to far outweigh the costs. (Jeff Nelson's revised analysis will be available at the meeting if not in your packet.) )` LLT- Z_ LOT #9 , HARBOR VIEW ROAD The site plan application for the proposed 20,000 square foot, 2� floor office building expired on June 19, 1985. This application shows no change to the approved site plan. I recommend that Mr. Larkin be required to comply with the recommendations of Wagner, Heindel and Noyse for erosion control and storm water detention since this plan received approval prior to the Commission's erosion policy. This should be stipulated as a condition prior to permit. 4) LACEY, 2000 WILLISTON ROAD (PLEASE VISIT THIS SITE PRIOR TO THE MEETING) The applicant requests a 6900 square foot addition to the existing 8900 square foot building that is used for carpet sales, storage and warehousing. The addition will be for warehouse use. Access: Access will not be changed from the existing driveway off Williston Road. A 1983 site plan approval stipulated that it be widened to 20 feet. Circulation: The applicant proposes to blacktop a new area at the rear of the building. This should be adequate for circulation. M PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 25, 1984 Airways wanted. They want to do some interior and exterior re vations and add two sma 1 additions to the building. The use of the bu' ding will remain the same. Ir. Gutting said the existing island in front f the building would be cleaned up an ome new plantings put in. The exi ing vegetation is overgrown. Plan in will be added around the fla ole and main entrance. The sewer capaL t for the building is al�re ht, because the building exists now. The addition would not require apacity. Ms. Bechtel said there re no parkin spaces on the site. Mr. Findlay said that they had the right t use the t on which they are currently parking. That is part of their contract wi t city of Burlington, which also owns the building. The Commission was conce ed that Burlington might decide to put a building on the parking lot and M . F1 lay said he would submit a letter of approval from the Airport Comm' sion and ut a copy of it with this plan. Mr. Dooley moved that t South Burlin ton 1-lanning Commission _approye_the site plan application of N thern Airways, lf'W Airport Drive for a 650�. f t. addition and a 100 s . f t. addition to tn_e rminal as shown on a plan entitled "Northern Air a s Burlin ton -4-4o'hql Airport", as prepared y Freeman -French -Free n,_dated 9/11 84, with the follQwing stipulations: 1. That a and for landscaping in the amount of permit. ted prior to 2. Yhat the applicant provide a letter from the BurlingtX Airport Commission showing their approval of the proposed additions rior o permit. 3. That this approval expires in 6'months. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and all voted aye. Consider revised site plan for fire access at DroDosed Larkin Office Build Ms. Bechtel said the fire access question for the building had been left to the fire chief and Mr. Blanchard to discuss and the resolution had been a 20' wide sidewalk. The chief has sent a letter approving the plan. Mr. Blanchard said the only other changes to the plan were that the entrance road was moved slightly to allow better access for fire trucks, and the fire hydrants were shown on the plan. Mr. Blanchard requested that this approval be for 9 months instead of 6 because of the winter coming up. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised site plan application of R.G. Blanchard for construction of a 20,000 sg. ft. 2 112 story office structure on lot 9, Harbor View Road as depicted on a__plan entitled "Site Plan and Profile - Proposed Office Building for Larkin Real estate" prepared -by R.G._Blanchard, Design Associates revised_ for fire access on September 17, 1984 with the followingstipulations: 1. All stipulations in the June 19, 1984_ap2roval are still in effect. 2. This approval expires 12 months from the original June 19► 1984 approval. firs. Maher seconded the motion and all voted for it. Other business Ms. Bechtel said that in June of 1983 the Commission had approved a site plan for Ira Tate for construction of a pet shop and industrial building on October 10, 1984 Robert Blanchard RG Design Associates 104 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear. Bob: Enclosed are the Findings of Fact from your recent Site Plan approval. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 1 Encl Memorandum September 25, 1984 agenda items 9/21/84 Page 3 7) NORTHERN AIRWAYS TERMINAL, 1150 AIRPORT DRIVE Northern Airways proposes to add a 650 square foot addition for use as a pilot's lounge and a 100 square foot line shack addition. This building serves as the general aviation terminal and passenger waiting facility and will continue as this. Circulation and Parking : A 25 foot wide driveway, (passenger drop off area) exists in the front of the building. The existing island in the center has several large trees. A 25' wide driveway (curb cut) on Airport Drive provides access to the parking lot and the Northern Airway terminal. There are approximately 93 existing spaces that are avilable to people using the terminal and the adjacent hangar. Evidently, this parking lot is not under lease by Northern Airways and is therefore considered off -site. Spaces are clearly striped. Landscaping and Screening: Landscaping plans substantially improve the appearance of the front of the building. Costs meet the re- quired amount. 8) LARKIN OFFICE BUILDING, LOT #9, HARBOR VIEW ROAD This site plan received your approval on June 12, 1984 with a stipulation that the revised fire access be approved by the Planning Commission. Bob Blanchard, Chief Godette and I have agreed upon the revised plan to best meet our concerns about fire access, aesthetics, and the zoning requirements. 9) YING AND JOSEPHINE LIU, HIGHLAND TERRACE Mr. Liu proposes to subdivide his 15 acre parcel into two lots of 10 acres and 5 acres. One will be a non -conforming lot. Mr. Liu is seeking a favorable response from you for this subdivision prior to requesting Zoning Board approval and investing further time and money in detailed engineering drawings for the preliminary plat. September 28, 1984 Bob Blanchard RG Design Associates 104 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Bob: Enclosed are the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of September 25 at which the Site Plan for Larkin Office Building received final approval. The following stipulations were set: 1) All stipulations in the June 19, 1984 approval are still in effect. 2) This approval expires 12 months froim the original June 19, 1984 approval. You must file for a building permit within 12 months. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 1 Encl t City Of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658- 7955 September 21, 1984 Bob Blanchard RG Design Associates 104 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Bob: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Agenda for the September 25 Planning Commission meeting. Please be sure someone is present to re- present your application. Also enclosed is my memo to the Commission and any other pertinent materials. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, 1 'j'x" Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg Encls -*vut4 +. urlingtnn Jfiire Department 575 Barnet #treet #nut4 Nurlington, Vermont 05481 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF 863-6455 September 20,1984 Mr. Sidney Poger Chairman So. Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VErmont 05401 Dear Mr. Poger, Revised plans have been reviewed by the fire department on the proposed office building for Larkin Real Estatewhich are dated September 17,1984. At this time I feel the proper changes have been made for the fire department and do not see any problems with giving fire protection. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. `Sincerely / James W. Goddette Sr. Chief June 21, 1984 Robert Blanchard R.C. Blanchard Design Associates 104 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Bob, Enclosed are the minutes regarding the Larkin Office Building on Bay View Drive.from the Planning Commission meetings of June 12, and June 19. The Planning Commission approved the construction of Larkin Office Building on Bay View Drive with the following stipulations: 1) That bonding for landscaping ($11,000) and site improve- ments (sewer, water, stormdrain at $20,000) shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit; 2) parking spaces shall be provided with thirteen parking spaces at compact car size (8h' x 16') and 18 spaces left undisturbed and to be paved over at the Commissions descration; 3) that an erosin control plan be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer and Planner for approval.; 4) That a snow fence be erected in the CO area and where any existing vegetation is to be saved; 5) that a sewer allocation of 1000 g.p.d. be made in accord- ance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy and the applicant placed on a waiting list. V10V � 6) That the sidewalk to the building be rev-iewed for fire protection and submitted to the Commission for approval; 7) that this approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Robert Blanchard R.G. Blanchard Design Associates June 21, 1984 Page 2 Please call me if you have any questions. I look forward to reviewing your revised plan. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 1 Encl. 3. PLANNING COMMISSIUN JUNE 19, 1984 converted from residential to office use, the resulting reduction in sewer use could be applied here. Those on the waiting list were contacted and had no objection. Ms. Bechtel said there had been a meeting today with the State and it was determined that there is no future capacity in either plant from now on. The motion carried with Mr. Burgess abstaining. Continue site plan application of RG Blanchard tabled 6 of Larkin Office Building. a 20.000 so. ft. 2 112 story I for construction Mr. Blanchard said he had met with the Chief, but the Chief still had problems with the building. He feels he cannot give it proper protection as the plan is now laid out. Fire Chief Goddette said he would feel better if the building could be moved to the middle of the site, with the parking lots on both sides of it for access. Mr. Jacob suggested that the sidewalk be enlarged to 20' of pavement and then trucks could go right up to the door. Chief Goddette said that would not allow for movement of the trucks. Mr. Jacob noted that trees and shrubs could be Kept away from the walk. Mr. Burgess suggested that the sidewalk angle be changed and that it be attached to the parking lot, and it was decided that Messrs. Blanchard and Goddette talk about this suggestion and see if it could be worked out. The sewer allocation was discussed. Ms. Bechtel said the State had made an error. Neither they nor the city had made an allocation for sewer for the commercial uses - only the residential. Commercial was to be done on a case - by -case basis. This application will have to go on the waiting list. Mr. Blanchard asked about transferring some allocation from residential to commercial and was told that was not allowed. It was noted that if the application were approved now, he would go on the waiting list immediately. If he waited to work out something with the Chief, he might receive a lower place in line. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission grant approval for the Site Plan A plication of R.G. Blanchard for construction of a 20,000 sq. ft, 2 112 story office structure on Lot #9, Harbor View Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan and Profile - Proposed Office Building for Larkin Real Estate" re ared by R.G.Blanchard Design Associates dated 2 84, with the following stipulations: 1. Bonding for landscaping (311,000) and site improvements sewer, water drain, $20,000 shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. That 62 parking spaces shall be provided with thirteen parking spaces at compact car size 8 1121 x 161), and space for the remaining 18 spaces shall remain undisturbed, subject to the right of the Planning Commission to require that the parking spaces be paved and used for parking. 3. That an erosion control plan be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer and Planner for approval. 4. That a snow fence be erected in the CO area and where any existing vegetation is to be saved. 5. That a sewer allocation of 1,000 gpd be made in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy and that the applicant be placed on the waiting list. 6. That the applicant submit to the Planning Commission for approval a 4. PLANNING CUMMISSIUN JUNE 19, 1984 plan showing a sidewalk in the front of the building for access for fire Protection, 7. This approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Belter seconded the motion. Mrs. Hurd did not like stipulation #6. She felt this was a major part of he plan and she said she would rather continue the plan for 2 weeks. Mr. Poge said a vote tonight would allow Mr. Blanchard to be put on the waiting list. 14r. Jacob felt the present wording protected the city. The.,motion carried unanimously. Informal discussion of 416.5 acre Planned Unit Development proposed by Ralph Goodrich Green Acres on Hinesbura Road. southerlv of Coffin Dronertv. and etween_I-8.9_and; Van_ S_icklen RoE Mr. Lamphere said Messrs. Mikell and Goodrich had concerns about the way their land had been zoned in the last zone change, so they had the land studied and developed`a plan which they feel is more compatible with the neighborhood. They showed this plan to the City Council and felt that they were given strong suppori\to send the plan to this Commission. They have also talked to the people eta Act 250 and the neighbors in the area. Mr. Lamphere showed slides of the,,land in question. Part of the acreage owned here lies in Williston. It ip\,zoned residential on that side of the brook. Mr. Lamphere said they had set up a major traffic pattern with a connector road running between Hinesburg R6hd and Brownell Road in Williston. That would collect both industrial and residential traffic. They are thinking of corporate offices in the quarry area`':, A road would eventually connect to Van Sicklen Road. Ms. Bechtel asked how many acres wire farmed now and was told that 150 were tillable and used for agricultural uses. 20 acres are open and 60 are wooded. Mr. Lamphere said he wanted to knd,� how the Commission felt about the concept of the plan before the legalitie'a of how to address it (i.e. zone change, conditional use approval) were discussed. The Commission discussed how the land was currently zoned. Mr. Lamphere`,said they took out some industrial areas and put in more commercial and added residential. Mr. Poger noted that when the Planning Commission had set up ,the current zoning, it had wanted to set aside some areas for large -lot, highiality uses such as Digital or IBM. This plan would take out those large areas a d put in smaller office uses. Mr. Lamphere clarified that he was not talking out retail uses in this d area when he used the wor"commercial". He felt they w nted both large and small corporate offices. Mr. Poger felt this was a large hange to the current zoning. He said the Commission had tried to be careful wit the zoning of the Southeast. Quadrant, feeling it was a valuable resource for t e city. They did not wants small lots in this area, but wanted to reserve large' real for large single users. He said there were areas in the city for the ty s of uses Mr. Lamphere was discussing. Mr. Lamphere said they wanted to creat�,,an area for people to both work and live. Mr. Poger felt the District Environmental Commission would probably ask the developers to set aside a certain area to be farmed. Mr. Dooley asked whether the developers had planned to leave any land in agricultural use and was told that after a certain time, Mr. Lamphere expected it would all be developed. They can leave some land open if they are allowed to develop to the intensity they feel they need in order to do what they want with the land. They are thinking about 296 housing units, some single family and some multi -family. M E M 0 TO: South Burlington Planning Commissio FROM: Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner \ ?� RE: Agenda Items for June 19, 1984 Meeting DATE: June 15, 1984 3. DORSET SQUARE ASSOCIATES (formerly V.L. Properties The Final Plat approval (5/18/84) included a stipulation that the landscaping plan must be approved by the Planning Commission. I have reviewed the submitted proposal and can verify a value of $20,000, as proposed by Mt. Philo Landscaping. (see attached letter) 4. ANCIENT ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE TEMPLE, Kimball Drive. Issues of concern with Fire Chief Goddette have been resolved. The cul-de-sac in front of the building will be enlarged to accomodate fire- fighting vehicles and provide access to the entire building front. Several parking spaces will be moved. Two fire hydrants will be placed within the site; one available to the lot on the east. The walkway will be moved out of the C.O. District. 5. LARKING OFFICE BUILDING, LOT # 9, Harbor View Road Fire Chief Goddette's issues of concern have been resolved. He was concerned that proper fire protection was prevented due to the size of the building and its location on the lot so that he had insufficient access to fight a fire. Chief Goddette, Bob Blanchard and I discussed these concerns thoroughly. A). The Chief has stated that his major concern is not with the safety of the people in the building but rather that the building itself can not be protected adequately and that firefighters may be in danger. A preferable alternative to this proposal is to locate the building centrally on the lot with 2 curb cuts and full access along the longest side of the building. Although this would be preferable to the Chief and for overall fire safety, he has agreed to the present proposal, notwithstanding his concern about the protection of the building itself. Chief Goddette is intending to attend the meeting to express his concerns. B). A fire hydrant will be placed on the corner at the entrance drive, connecting to the 6" water line. A second hydrant is located at lot #3 across the street which will serve the proposed building; a hydrant is also available at lot #5. I do not recommend waiving any of the 80 parking spaces that are required by this 22 story, 20,000 square foot office building. The sewer allocation has not been resolved. At this point, our records do not show an allocation for commercial use; the state's figures (Act 250) do not correspond with ours; and we are at capacity at the Bartletts Bay Plant. Additional, updated information may be available at the meeting. This application can be placed on the waiting list at 1000 qpd. 3. PLANNING CUMMISSION JUNE 12, 1984 Site plan application of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite Temple for construction of a`9920 sq. ft. building including a theatre area and dining facility on Kimball Avenue Mr. James Lamphere spoke to the plan. He noted that the application had been before the Zoning Board and had been approved there. The theatre will contain 300 seats. An area has been left open for possible future access to the north. The walk from the rear/parking lot to the building is partly in the CO zone, but Mr. Lamphere they could move it. Mr. Lamphere, commenting on the letter from the fire chief, noted that site plan items were screening, circulation,landscaping, etc. He felt water service was normally taken care of during subdivision review. Mrs. Maher felt this would be a very large building, with a lot of people using it, and she wanted to know what it was that concerned the chief so much. She suggested that in the future, if the Chief felt he could not approve a plan, he should come to the meeting to tell the Commission why, or he should specify what he did not like in a letter. Mr. Poger asked that the Chief attend the next meeting, or send letter with more details. Mrs. Maher, owed to continue this hearing until next week, June 19, at City Hall at 7:30 pm. Mr. Belter seconded the motion and all voted aye. I Sketch plan application of Ver-Mada, Inc., for a 2 lot subdivision on Williston Rd. Ms. Bechtel said Ver-Mada would not be coming in tonight. Site plan application of R.G.Blanchard for construction of Larkin Office Building a 20,000 sq. ft., 2 112 story building on Harbor View Road The question of sewer allocation was discussed. Ms. Bechtel said the city had reserved 43,000 gpd for the residential use in the overall development, but had not reserved anything for the commercial use. The State, in its calculations, estimated a use of 33,000 gpd for both residential and commercial. Mr. Blanchard said he would come back to the Commission with a decision on whether he could swap gallonage between the two uses. He said they would iron it all out. Mr. Blanchard said this site was not the same size as the site the 10,000 sq. ft. building was approved on. This is 500' long rather than 300' and is 145' wide vs. 1351. He said the approved building and perking lot had gone over the bank, because the contours had not proved to be correct when field -checked. Mr. Blanchard said the parking spaces were not curved. They meet the minimum 9' x 18' size, but in parts they are wider. Aisles are 24' wide. Some compact spaces are shown, and there are 2 handicapped spaces also. Mr. Blanchard said he would keep the highest point on the building, including the heating and cooling units, under the city's maximum allowed height. Mr. Blanchard felt that part of the Fire Chief's problem with the building was that he could not get close enough to the building. Now there is no parking in front of the building, and the roof will now be flat. Mr. Jacob suggested widening the sidewalk so the Chief could back his truck up to the front door. The Commission addressed the points in his. Bechtel's 6/8/84 memo. Ins. Blanchard did not feel all the parking spaces shown would be needed. He asked about reserving an area for them, but not paving them until needed, and was told to work on that with the Planner as to the number to leave unpaved. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the hearing until June 19, 1984 at City Hall at 700 pm. Mr. Belter seconded the motion and all voted aye. M E M 0 TO: Planning Commission FROM: William Szymanski, City Manager RE: Agenda Items for 6/12/84 DATE: June 8, 1984 3) Scottish Rite Temple, Kimball Ave. 1. The proposed walkway to the north parking area infringes upon conservation zone and may require extensive filling to provide an acceptable walking slope. 5) Office Building #9, Bay View Dr. I. The parking lot storm drain should outlet to the north instead of the street which will necessitate disturbing the new sidewalk. (j1(�cj�j�; � 2. The curved parking spaces will be difficult to enter into especially large cars. 3. The Bartletts Bay sewage treatment plant is fully committed. There is no reserve. Proposals for expanding the plant by 100,000 gpd are being solicited from area consultants. These proposals are due June 22, 1984. 6) Celani Office Building, 22 Patchen Road 1. Method of handling storm water runoff should be shown. Also north arrow. 2. A connecting drive to the commercial property to the south would be a benefit. including a service area drive turn -around, and a walkway to the wooded area from the north parking lot. See Bill's memo regarding walkway. Fire Chief Goddette has serious reservations about this plan and does not recommend approval. (See letter 6/ 8/84 ) Landscapirig and Screening:_ $13,000 is required in landscaping. The proposal is for $9,400. Credit is requested for trees that will be saved ($3,500). Protection of the CO District is necessary during construction. A swale is shown at the northern property line as suggested by the City Engineer. Other: A 60' wide R.O.W. is reserved for access to Dr. J. Browns property 30' on this parcel). The Sewer Allocation is 400 gpd. 4). RAMADA INC, WILLISTON RD., 2-LOT SUBDIVISION The Ver-Mada, Inc. is proposing to subdivide its 8.6 acre parcel into a 6.1 acre parcel on which the Ramada Inn is located, and a 2.5 acre parcel to the South, abutting Corporate Circle. This is a major subdivision. It is zoned commercial. The frontage on the proposed Corporate Circle lot is 407.3 feet. There appear to be no major issues of concern. 5) LARKIN OFFICE BUILDING, LOT #9, HARBOR VIEW ROAD A site plan was approved on March 13, 1984 for the construction of a 10,000 square foot building on this site. This current proposal requests approval of a 20,000 sq. ft. building. A building of this size requires 80 parking spaces. which are presented to meet the minimum requirements but are somewhat constrained by the lot restrictions (CO District and steep slope at rear of parcel). The Commission should discuss the adviseability of a 20,000 sq. ft structure on this parcel, given these constraints. Circulation and Parking: 80 spaces are required and are proposed. The applicant is requesting a waiver of the parking space requirement to allow for 11 compact \ �� cars in the center of the lot. The Commission may approve up to 25% or 20 compact / car spaces. Two handicapped spaces are shown but do not have adequate backing area. 0 K Furthermore, one handicapped space disrupts the required 15' strip along the front nDLA� of the parcel. Circulation is marginal in the eastern end of the parking lot meeting minimum oocz aisle widths of 20'. Proposed zoning regulation amendments call for 24' aisles a y' in a double row lot. Three hundred trips (in and out) are projected daily, (averaging 38 per hour in and out), suggesting moderately heavy traffic and parking requirements. Landscaping and Screening: The proposed landscaping plan was verified at approximately $9900, rather then the required $11,000. Mr. Blanchard is requesting credit for saving existing trees, and/or will submit a revised plan to me for approval. During construction,the CO District must be protected. Also, a row of yews is shown in front of the snow removal area and will be destroyed by plows. They should be moved. move& Other: The 15' strip is disturbed by the handicapped space along Bay View Road. The space should be moved. There is presently no sewer capacity available at Bartletts Bay Plant. A sewer allocation of 1000 gpd should be made in accordance with the sewer policy. See Bill Szymanski's memo regarding other issues. Chie-Goddette does not recommend approval. ( see letter 6/8/84 ) f.� #uut4 +Burlington Nire Department 575 Dorset #treet r fvut4 igurlingtnn, Vermont 85401 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF 863-6455 June 8,1984 Ms. Jane Bechtel City Planner City Of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Ms Bechtel, Plans were reviewed by this department for the new office complex on lot #4 Bay View Drive for Mr. Larkins and the following was found; A. Because of the size of the building it is so located on the lot that fire equipment would not beable to set up properly for giving fire protection. B. Two (2) hydrants will be required on the property. At this time I do not feel this project should be approved. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Sincerely ' James W. Goddette Sr. Chief H 1\1N Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. consulting geologists P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820 June 27. 1986 Mrs. Jane Bechtel City Planner Municipal Building Dorset Street South Burlington, Dear Jane: Lef leur Vermont 05401 We have completed our analysis of the site plan for the proposed office building for Larkin Real Estate (Lot #9. Harbor View Road) within the Bartlett Brook watershed. Due to the location of the site within the watershed, and the timing of the peak discharge, we do not recommend the construction of a retention basin on this site. The presence of a basin would reduce the peak discharge from the site itself to predevelopment levels, but would cause an increase in peak discharge at the base of the watershed. We have also included our recommendations for the treatment of stormwater from the site, since it will not be detained. Please contact me if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, Jeffrey A. Nelson, Geologist WAGNER, HEINDEL, AND NOYES, INC. cc: Krebs and Lansing R. G. Blanchard Design Associates JAN:cjp H 1\1N Wagner, Helndel, and Noyes, Inc. consulting geologists P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820 ANALYSIS OF HYDROLOGIC IMPACT LARKIN REAL ESTATE OFFICE BUILDING BARTLETT BROOK WATERSHED Prepared by: Jeffrey A. Nelson Geologist Reviewed by: Jeffrey E. Noyes Date: June 27, 1986 ANALYSIS OF HYDROLOGIC IMPACT LARKIN REAL. ESTATE OFFICE BUILDING BARTLETT BROOK WATERSHED INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of hydrologic analyses performed by Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. of the impact of the proposed Larkin Real Estate Office Buildinq on Bartlett Brook. The location of the site is shown on the watershed schematic (see Appendix, p. 1). Currently the site is partially an open field and partially wooded. Stormwater movement off the site in its current condition is via overland flow to the south fork of Bartlett Brook which is located just to the north of the site. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS The hydrologic response of the site has been examined using the TR20 computer model. The data file which represents the Bartlett Brook watershed was refined in the vicinity of the site in order to enable a more exact prediction of peak discharge rates durinq the desiqn storm. The desiqn storm used in the analysis, as per directive of the South Burlington Planninq Commission is a 25-year, 24-hour storm or 4.0" of rainfall in 24 hours. 2 The site is located in subwatershed BA of the south fork of IBartlett Brook. Modifications were made to this portion of the data file to the curve number and time of concentration. These Ihydroloqic variables will chanqe as a result of the proposed development since 48% of the site will be covered with paved Iareas or building roofs. It is required that developments within the watershed cause no increase in peak discharge to the brook as a result of changes in land use. Therefore, it is Igenerally necessary to provide a retention basin of adequate volume to store the excess runoff which is caused by the Iincrease in impervious surfaces created by the development. SITE. CHARACTERIZATION The Larkin Office Building site is underlain by soils which ranqe from Group B through Group D (see Appendix, p. 2). Group B soils are defined by the Soil Conservation Service as having relatively high infiltration rates and thus lower rates of runoff. Group D soils, which are generally clay, have very low infiltration rates and thus very high rates of runoff. Group C soils, also found on the site, are intermediate in their hydrologic characteristics. In its existinq condition, runoff 3 I from the site occurs via overland flow to the north, ultimately Ienterinq the south fork of Bartlett Brook just to the north of the site. The proposed development will alter this drainaqe pattern in the following manner. Runoff from the parkinq lot on site will be collected in two catch basins in the parkinq lot and will then flow to the existinq storm drain system on Harbor View Road. This system discharges to the small swale immediately to the west of the site which then flows into the south fork of Bartlett Brook. Runoff from the roof of the building, although not specified in the site plan, should be directed to this swale as well, using a rip -rapped channel where slopes exceed 4%. Computations performed to assess the existinq runoff condition of the site and those under the proposed development are included on pages 4 through 6 of the Appendix. These computations show that the runoff curve number for the site will increase from 70 to 86 as a result of the development, and the time of concentration will remain essentially unchanqed. Since flow which passes through the small swale just to the west of the site is combined with flow from the site itself, the hydroloqic variables for this area have been computed as well. A watershed area of approximately 7.4 acres drains through this swale (see Appendix, p. 7). 4 RESULTS The TR20 data file initially used to examine the impact of the proposed developed is included on page 8 of the Appendix. The results of this simulation indicate that the peak discharge from this site for the desiqn storm would increase from 3.69 cfs in the undeveloped condition to 6.46 cfs for the proposed development without detention basins. The time at which peak occurs within the storm would remain essentially the same, occurring at just prior to 12 hours (11.97, 11.96 hours) into the 24-hour storm event (see Appendix, pp. 10 - 13). The site provides a somewhat difficult situation with respect to detention due to its proximity to the stream channel. The peak discharge for the entire Bartlett Brook watershed is projected to occur at 12.92 hours. Therefore, the peak from the office building site occurs nearly one hour prior to that from the watershed as a whole due to its proximity to the trunk stream. The first detention option considered proposes that the detention basin be used only for runoff coming from the proposed development site itself. Trial and error solutions were performed and total basin volume of 0.117 acre-ft. or 38,000 gallons would be required to reduce the post -development peak discharge from the site itself to that of the pre -development condition (see Appendix, pp. 14 - 16). However, upon examination of the resulting peak discharge at the base of the 5 watershed, it can be seen that an increase of nearly 1 cfs occurs. As explained earlier, this is a result of the timing of the hydrograph peaks. Since the site is located so close to the stream, its peak discharge passes out of the watershed prior to the main peak which occurs nearly an hour later. Therefore, by providinq the detention basin and delaying the release of the peak dis"har qc from the site., an overall increase aathe peak discharge for the watershed near its base is observed. The second detention option which was considered was to provide an adequately sized storage reservoir to retain not only the runoff from the site itself, but also the runoff from the small watershed area just to the south of Harbor View Road. In this way it would not be necessary to provide drainage structures to route this water around the basin if it were to be located within the low area just to the west of the development site. Usinq a basin volume equivalent to that previously set forth for the site itself results in some reduction in the peak discharge of the combined hydrograph to 25.38 cfs (see Appendix, pp. 17 - 18). However, this is still qreater than the pre -development peak discharge of 23.94 cfs. In specifying larqer basin volumes this post -development peak could be reduced to the pre -development value. However, the problem discussed above with respect to the timing of the arrival of the hydrograph peak would still cause an increase in the overall peak discharge for the watershed at its base. 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Based upon the location of this site in the Bartlett Brook watershed, it does not appear that detention basins would be helpful in attemptinq to mitigate the problems of increased peak discharge and erosion in the Bartlett Brook watershed. For all basins sizings excepting an extremely larqe structure ;approximately IICi,vvv y'ai.; WAIIi_II would effectively store all runoff from the site for the desiqn storm, and release it very late in the storm, it is not possible to provide any overall reduction in peak discharge at the mouth of the brook. The most minimal impact is projected if no basin is provided on site, since this peak discharge will pass into the Bay prior to the arrival of the peak from more remote portions of the watershed. 2. It is our recommendation that the Applicant provide sumped catch basins or some other suitable means by which the stormwater runoff from paved areas can be treated to remove sediment and floatinq materials prior to discharge to Bartlett Brook. 3. Runoff from the buildinq roof should be directed to the swale just west of the property. Grassy swales should be used for ground slopes of less than 4%, and stone -lined ditches for slopes of greater than 4%. Rip -rap should be sized and provided as needed in the drainage Swale, as determined by the project enqineer. 4. Since the site is located so close to the brook, extreme care should be exercised to prevent erosion and siltation of Bartlett Brook during construction, including the use of silt fence and hay bales along the entire northern and western edge of the site. Further, hay bales should be placed in at least two locations within small drainaqe swales to the west of the site, C25 16" x 85''- 1 �—N VT— N ♦� WEIR S�II— N allow -► BARTIET T BRp0 CIO 65" x 515' WEIR-� ,c SEE N, Ca & 5 s►�- WEIR-Z C6 77.5' vff- C Yff A C28 18 x 20' ' 4 STRUCTURE C22 42" x 4O' 08 e TRUCTU RE 07 • S�Ati.�, � 1 � 4 U a Green Mountoi , Or 41 - cP-- -VER. _E Peok Qest = 5 c fs Estimated Copocity 10 cfs f NEW 24" RCP CULVERT j Peak Q,,t = 26 cfs . Estimated Copocity 26 cfs S/NGL25 / Ve E Aa t - _ B B B18 BIA 81A rQ11' .. (. C-9c f �A AdA Rt ve Area Ve D <a j r0I Arm �/II B r f Hn B 1' G9 C We Bt B Ew wMaw ve B EwA Ad r G9 C GeS AdB Ad A Bt A DrQi %o y Ad ,A �e ' BIB ,I `roi h EwA Drai BO 1 EwA Fin A i Gr B , Ge B Ge B t M B Fin. A � DrQi,F.ge Area A Ve C Ew e /GeC /�C St A Ve B Ur / INFvu q ATF APCH CXII VFRT Ve 8 iz- AC Iter) r,• G �,. •� . .. rJ I C v •THY .. �K:�1 , T, t H W�N g Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont Page No. PAGE OF PROJECT fs�rL`�E�' 1C /�(zt� `"i DATE: (" 14 " b L. C'UN J�> kl-u 0 _ 1 too A G N D� .anti nj pr-T k t.1 50, GP, t_.RNo ust=.. C_N 0. SS \ At, wa�o �0 (:).lt3 �,�I L1.13 C. W �o ocE.� �3 o,soc6 OPf nl �.PRcE $o O, C►J= 4� 11M�: CA�NCJ£/VTYL LIAl o�! i,lz �-ANfl FLu l...I S = C�►sc - l �fi � /23 p = 13,E V(� V L./v + Go Q)L 'ict-itM arc �Q nJ L A N D 0-A- C- N C�96 . -4c6 `I 4C Lk $ L1(o 1 .101 1�,t- �CNz s(o,l Lr�f-8� H0Page No. Wagner, Heindel, and NoyDVermont PAGE OF WN PROJECT 8(i �l TL£ cc p•� tti vJ _ Consulting Geologists Burlington DATE: T L�� �� c-, N C-C-,".rr41-A--r V;Z I S = a7. V = a,s c:-V s t = S-1 V _ H Fr�s, H WVN Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont PAGE OF Page No. PROJECT DATE:_ (o - 31-u•'h6 LjAA'�P, L qp- o f yMz'it", rz_ v'EW = 37;;,.3u �nZX Iu�Fi'/;.z = 3a�>�oQ> FTa = 4, 4 --L PL C.v2ve- `'S,43 PVC = O.ovSy N�iz" D S o L-s - ue- N s PA-c-C. ti1=-4s o 0,A,e- = O,oc� 13s m'IZ" CN•'/c b,-44o Art, z O.UU t� an�z" CN /u = $• 1 P WQ-O f cArcp a.11 AL = O, O G 33 Wl,z GN "A' S = I' I, V ! �5- 15U Se c- = o, U'z— t = t p +t o. O-1'-tS tZ 2C,P Ate- 1-t 14rZ 6ytt V Ew 2p A`fliM� IN l �T G0NZY4.o tr IS I I.d �•� �fS v, oo ► lF D,C>U--:L Iga- a,o la.o 01UO3 I�3 3.o a5.0 p.c>o b 205� -tom Res \� ,.... -- . N Orr) t Droi�a9e Mercia/ Ditch a CO rn ; J �• O / �, O N s�.rh7tjp� �p�b � t nes Corp. I Elevatio 3 N -- s20 pike in ?a8 ti t ff � t� a�a� _.� `ice _... �". / . 3. aaa.•S� `..� a. �,.•�Z=r ----------'-\ � �``a�—�'� �aa tom•, - •�.... `, y�- \ / ' (�/�/- '7 _�,� ��----� � `J 7 .. t:. - ,z. :4',y. `fir,. - - , L v .�' +•+ _ N / ..R\X�• i � � � N N u. � •I Q N * �- FT 6I � n 44 srx / CR? Rood 1 � ++� OD Concord N 69 - 1r)Ves frnorr � t Gr //••�� a. e 271 _ •M. `:w:>iy{:::v>;;2:y:>;,':::�s:<:?::+ti9'.L'.<::;•:`;::;:;;:fx;•:%�<�aS?..;::'•$a,�$;va'�:: :::..,.:.......::.::..::>: ik 3 36„ Root Farrell BUrlingtOn D white Ook 2'9 N LIST OF INPUT DATA FOR TR-20 HYDROLOGY****************° JOB TR-20 SUMMARY NOPLOTS o� TITLE 001 BARTLETT BROOK MODEL(1984+CONDITONS) LARKIN OFFICE BLDG. 3 STRUCT 01 e 180. 0.0 0.0 8 181.0 4.80 0.001 8 181.5 9.10 0.002 8 182.0 12.0 0.003 +I 8 183.0 25.0 0.006 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 02 �.- 9 ENDTBL 6 RUNOFF 1 01 6 0.0116 77. 0.0945 1 1 1 1 1 6 RUNOFF 1 02 7 0.00257 70. 0.040 1 1 1 1 1 6 ADDHYD 4 02 6 7 5 1 1 1 1 1 ENDATA 7 INCREM 6 0.10 7 BASFLO 5 0.001 7 COMPUT 7 01 02 4.0 1.0 2 2 01 01 ENDCMP 1 r; 7 ALTER 3 6 RUNOFF 1 01 6 0.0116 77. 0.0945 1 1 1 1 1 6 RUNOFF 1 02 7 0.00257 ✓ 86. 0.043 1 1 1 1 1 6 ADDHYD 4 02 6 7 5 1 1 1 1 1nE 7 BASFLO 5 0.001 7 COMPUT 7 01 02 4.0 1.0 2 2 02 01 ENDCMP 1 ENDJOB 2 n*******************************END OF 80-80 LIST****************************** n H W�N Wagner, Heindel , and Noyes, Inc. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont Page No. PAGE OF PROJECT DATE- L D- 4s6 DES 1(� o STo a -A v15 tit�AnZ � �-'1 �iUUJL iC> �Z- /✓\. try tIQ1viL Cs,�•s,� T,P, LtQ) o P� 5 � p �.v�.w � r�,EnrT` 2v N � �' � •• a.�3 •, GvNS2VA-Tl1UrLA, L i:- lam• /�"•r = 53, 5b0 �-�•L, Usk /Z lAl�j Vafv �41EL4 (iFiv4�j SC�tifc Mom' I C. 'USN kwn/ UsZ-n.�S 1 �AvLU& OF ,It." 0kAKZtq-t- 4'vf„ V, (0 V F T 1(-A4 , l WC Ae-5 Qv EL Q4VutuM ei cat O O C� `Co"1 I 6,(03 Oo�o l��.S �•� 1,0c6 I�u a 1•�c; o,osa ��i,a5' 3•zS 3.17... 0og3 TR20 XEO 6-20-86 REV 05i02i83 BARTLETT BROOK MODEL(1984.CONDITONS) HARBOR INN-POSTDEUEL. CALIBRATED BASED ON MAY 27-28, 1985 RAINSTORM WKN 1 ex-*-r 3 � REOt,ufc,w P)w si.,vT, JOB 1 SUMMARY PAGE 16 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(-) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTIONZ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA ; COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 Ao- 12.24 223.97 871.5 STRUCTURE 1 RESVOR .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 229.34 13.52 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 1 REACH .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 210.98 13.60 * 31.47 • 122.4 XSECTION 2 RUNOFF .083 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .98 Ao- 12.24 36.52 440.0 XSECTION 3 ADDHYD .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 206.26 12.25 67.39 198.2 XSECTION 5 REACH .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 196.74 12.37 65.48 192.6 STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 .8A- 12.32 53.11 303.5 STRUCTURE 2 RESUOR .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 925.84 12.32 56.20 321.1 XSECTION 4 REACH .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .80 191.83 12.42 56.10 320.6 STRUCTURE 3 ADDHYD .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 .88- 12.41 120.93 234.8 STRUCTURE 3 RESUOR .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 .88- 12.41 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 6 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 192.24 12.51 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 7 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.01) 1.33 147.96 12.61 120.04 233.1 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF .110 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.40 .88- 12.15 88.95 808.6 XSECTIDN 7 ADDHYD .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 148.12 12.59 147.19 235.5 STRUCTURE 4 RESUOR .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 150.38 12.67 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 REACH .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 133.22 12.77 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF .006 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.86 .88- 11.96 11.49 1915.5 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .631 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 133.22 12.77 140.11 222.1 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .263 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.24 .89- 12.44 164.75 626.4 XSECTION 10 RUNOFF .050 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.27 .98- 12.25 29.72 594.4 XSECTION 11 ADDHYD .313 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 202.74 12.41 188.19 601.3 XSECTION 12 REACH .313 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.66 146.09 12.51 188.19 601.3 XSECTION 12 RUNOFF .018 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 .98- 12.01 24.51 1369.4 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .331 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 146.91 12.50 191.64 579.1 STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .012 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.79 Ao- 11.97 20.25 1745.8,jPswP STRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 .08- 11.92 3.69 1434.0 %lr- STRUCTURE 8 ADDHYD .014 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 AO- 11.92 23.94 1689.2 r-Tw XSECTION 12 RUNOFF .013 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.93 .88- 11.96 33.59 2507.1 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .344 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.70 146.92 12.50 194.92 $66.1 XSECTION 12 ADOHYD .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.011 1.70 146.94 12.50 197.61 551.3 STRUCTURE 5 RESUOR .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 147.65 12.50 198.43 553.6 TR20 XEQ 6-20-86 BARTLETT BROOK MOOEL(1984.CONDITONS) HARBOR INN-POSTOEVEL. JOB 1 SUMMARY REV 05/02/83 CALIBRATED BASED ON MAY 27-28, 1985 RAINSTORM PAGE 17 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA # COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SQ MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 XSECTION 13 REACH .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.70 132.64 12.60 198.43 553.6 XSECTION 13 RUNOFF .015 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.60 .80- 11.99 20.93 1395.3 XSECTION 13 ADDHYD .373 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.70 132.65 12.60 200.91 537.9 STRUCTURE 6 ADDHYD 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.48 124.10 12.63 333.82 332.3 STRUCTURE 6 RESUOR 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.48 123.94 12.82 311.74 310.4 XSECTION 14 REACH 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.48 103.75 12.92 311.74 310.4 1 1v11N (�osTOCvp��Pr+6NT- SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED (A RESULTS STAR(-) AFTER OF THE STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE PEAK DISCHARGE CONTROL TIME AND RATE (CFS) INSTRUCTIONS VALUES IN THE ORDER PERFORMED INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH No gNbwS�> A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA # CONO INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SQ MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 .88- 12.24 223.97 871.5 STRUCTURE 1 RESVOR .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 229.34 13.52 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 1 REACH .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.O0 1.81 210.98 13.60 31.42 * 122.4 XSECTION 2 RUNOFF .083 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .98 .89- 12.24 36.52 440.0 XSECTION 3 ADDHYD .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 206.26 12.25 67.39 198.2 XSECTION 5 REACH .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 196.74 12.37 65.48 192.6 STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 .88- 12.32 53.11 303.5 STRUCTURE 2 RESUOR .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.OU .82 925.84 12.32 56.20 321.1 XSECTION 4 REACH .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .80 191.83 12.42 56.10 320.6 STRUCTURE 3 ADDHYD .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 .98- 12.41 120.93 234.8 STRUCTURE 3 RESUOR .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.OU 1.33 .GQ- 12.41 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 6 REACH, .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 192.24 12.51 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 7 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 147.96 12.61 120.04 233.1 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF .110 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.40 .6A- 12.15 88.95 808.6 XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 148.12 12.59 147.19 235.5 STRUCTURE 4 RESUOR .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.O0 1.35 150.38 12.67 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 REACH .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 133.22 12.77 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF .006 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.86 .69- 11.96 11.49 1915.5 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .631 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 133.22 12.77 140.11 222.1 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .263 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.74 .6B- 12.44 164.75 626.4 XSECTION 10 RUNOFF .050 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.27 .88- 12.25 29.72 594.4 XSECTION 11 ADDHYD .313 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 202.74 12.41 188.19 601.3 XSECTION 12 REACH .313 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.O0 1.66 146.89 12.51 188.19 601.3 XSECTION 12 RUNOFF .018 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 GB- 12.01 24.51 '1369.4 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .331 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 146.91 12.50 191.64 579.1 STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .012 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.79 .80- 11.97 20.25 1745.8vPz.�rc STRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.53 .88- 11.96 6.46 2514.85-T- STRUCTURE 8 ADDHYD .014 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.92 .88- 11.97 26.68 1882.6 XSECTION 12 RUNOFF .013 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.53 &8- 11.96 33.59 2507.1 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .344 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.70 146.92 12.50 194.92 566.1 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 146.94 12.50 197.84 551.9 STRUCTURE 5 RESVOR .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 147.66 12.50 198.72 554.4 J TR20 XEO 6-20-86 REV 05/02/83 BARTLETT BROOK MODEL(1984.CONOITONS) HARBOR INN-POSTDEVEL. CALIBRATED BASED ON MAY 27-28, 1985 RAINSTORM JOB 1 SUMMARY PAGE 17 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(-) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA (k COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SQ MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 ' XSECTION 13 REACH .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 132.64 12.60 198.72 554.4 XSECTION 13 RUNOFF .015 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.60 .98- 11.99 20.93 1395.3 XSECTION 13 ADDHYO .373 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.70 132.66 12.60 201.20 538.7 STRUCTURE 6 ADDHYD 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.48 124.10 12.63 334.09 332.6 STRUCTURE 6 RESUOR 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.49 123.94 12.82 311.97 310.6 s XSECTION 14 REACH 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.48 103.75 12.92 311.97 310.6 W I t �7_ 1__ o9T\m� v OB TR-20 SUMMARY NOPLOTS �[TLE 001 BARTLETT BROOK MODEL(1984+CONOlTONS) HARBOR INN-PUSTDEUEL. TITLE CALIBRATED BASED ON MAY 27-28/ 1985 RAINSTORM XSECTN 012 1.0 14;7.0 12 8 1413. 0'0 U'O 8 145.2 0'26 0.16 ' 8 145.4 2.26 0.86 |8 145'6 �.76 2'25 | '8 145.8 16'87 4'04 8 146' 29'00 6'00 8 147. 208.60 27.10 |9 EN0TBL 3 STRUCT 87 8 180, U.O 0.0 (B 181.0 4'80 0^001 6�w-� ��vLA'Le�+u_ '8 181.5 9.10 0'002 8 182'0 12'0 0.003 |8 } 183.0 25.0 0.006 '9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 08 «' G), L»^^«~ 168' O'O U'U l8 e 168'59r 0.26 0'0009^'^w 8 169'0 0'63 0.0080 8 169'5 1'08 0'0239 |8 170.0 1'60 0'0524 | 8 171.0 2.82 0.0846 8 171.213 3.12 0,0925 8 172.0 20'0 0'1168 /9 ENOTBL 8 RUNOFF l 07 8 0.0118 77' 0.0945 l 1 1 1 l RUNOFF 1 08 4 0.00257 88' 0.043 1 1 l 1 1 18 8 RESVOR 2 08 4 1 168.0 1 l 1 6 ADDHYD 4 012 1 6 4 11 ll1 ENDATA \7 [NCREM 8 0.10 ) 7 BASFLO 5 0.0041 1.0 24'0 7 COMPUT 7 87 012 4.0 1'0 2 2 01 Ul | | ENDCMP 1 / ENDJOB 2 L H1:: SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(•) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- 10 OPERATION AREA It COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (1N) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 GG- 12.24 223.97 871.5 STRUCTURE 1 RESVOR .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 229.34 13.52 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 1 REACH .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 210.98 13.60 • 31.42 k 122.4 XSECTION 2 RUNOFF .083 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .98 GG- 12.24 36.52 440.0 XSECTION 3 ADDHYD .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 206.26 12.25 67.39 198.2 XSECTION 5 REACH .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 196.74 12.37 65.48 192.6 STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 GG- 12.32 53.11 303.5 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOR .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 925.84 12.32 56.20 321.1 XSECTION 4 REACH .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .80 191.83 12.42 56.10 320.6 STRUCTURE 3 ADDHYD .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 GO- 12.41 120.93 234.8 STRUCTURE 3 RESVOR .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.Off 1.33 GG- 12.41 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 6 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 192.24 12.51 120.93 234.8 XSECTION 7 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.0(1 1.33 147.96 12.61 120.04 233.1 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF .110 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.O0 1.40 GO- 12.15 88.95 808.6 XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 148.12 12.59 147.19 235.5 STRUCTURE 4 RESUDR .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 150.38 12.67 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 REACH .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 133.22 12.77 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF .006 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.86 .GG- 11.96 11.49 1915.5 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .631 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 133.22 12.77 140.11 222.1 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .263 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.74 GG- 12.44 164.75 626.4 XSECTION 10 RUNOFF .050 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.27 GO- 12.25 29.72 594.4 XSECTION 11 ADDHYD .313 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 202.74 12.41 188.19 601.3 XSECTION 12 REACH .313 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.O0 1.66 146.89 12.51 188.19 601.3 XSECTION 12 RUNOFF .018 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.62 GG- 12.01 24.51 1369.4 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .331 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 146.91 12.50 191.64 579.1 STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .012 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.79 GG- 11.97 20.25 1745.8:. STRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.53 GG- 11.96 6.46 2514.8 STRUCTURE 8 RESVOR .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.61 171.25 12.07 3.15 1226.3r,,t XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .014 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.94 145.90 11.98 23.04 1626.1-_�� XSECTION 12 RUNOFF .013 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.53 GG- 11.96 33.59 2507.1 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .344 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.70 146.92 12.50 194.92 566.1 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 146.94 12.50 198.71 554.3 TR20 XEO 6-22-86 BARTLETT BROOK MODEL(1984.CONDITONS) HARBOR INN-POSTDEVEL. JOB 1 SUMMARY REV 05/02/83 CALIBRATED BASED ON MAY 27-28, 1985 RAINSTORM PAGE 17 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA # COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 5 RESVOR .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 147.66 12.50 199.46 556.4 XSECTION 13 REACH .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 132.65 12.60 199.46 556.4 XSECTION 13 RUNOFF .015 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.60 .88- 11.99 20.93 1395.3 XSECTION 13 ADDHYD .373 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 132.66 12.60 201.94 540.7 STRUCTURE 6 ADDHYD 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.O0 1.48 124.11 12.63 334.82 333.3 STRUCTURE 6 RESVOR 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.49 123.95 12.82 312.77 311.4 XSECTION 14 REACH 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.48 103.75 12.92 312.77 311.4 I 8ra5,k )J o P r k 0�1 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED lA STAR(-) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE HOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA # COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (S0 MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 AA- 12.24 223.97 871.5 STRUCTURE 1 RESVOR .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.OU 1.81 229.34 13.52 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 1 REACH .257 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 210.98 13.60 ■ 31.42 • 122.4 XSECTION 2 RUNOFF .083 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .98 .AA- 12.24 36.52 440.0 XSECTION 3 ADDHYD .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 286.26 12.25 67.39 198.2 XSECTION 5 REACH .340 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 196.74 12.32 65.48 192.6 STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 .AA- 12.32 53.11 303.5 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOR .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 925.84 12.32 56.20 321.1 XSECTION 4 REACH .175 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .80 191.83 12.42 56.10 320.6 STRUCTURE 3 ADDHYD .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 AA- 12.41 120.93 234.8 STRUCTURE 3 RESUOR .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 AA- 12.41 120.93 234.E XSECTIDN 6 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 192.24 12.51 120.93 234.8 XSECTIDN 7 REACH .515 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 147.96 12.61 120.04 233.1 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF .110 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.40 .AA- 12.15 88.95 808.6 XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 148.12 12.59 147.19 235.5 STRUCTURE 4 RESVOR .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 150.38 12.67 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 REACH .625 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 133.22 12.77 139.19 222.7 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF .006 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.86 AA- 11.96 11.49 1915.5 XSECTION B ADDHYD .631 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 133.22 12.77 140.11 222.1 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .263 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.74 .8A- 12.44 164.75 626.4 XSECTION 10 RUNOFF .050 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.27 .AA- 12.25 29.72 594.4 XSECTION 11 ADDHYD .313 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 202.74 12.41 188.19 601.3 XSECTION 12 REACH .313 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.66 146.89 12.51 188.19 601.3 XSECTION 12 RUNOFF .018 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 AA- 12.01 24.51 1369.4 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .331 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 146.91 12.50 191.64 579.1 STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .012 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.79 AA- 11.92 20.25 1745.8 -,L STRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.53 A@- 11.96 6.46 2514.8_.K XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .014 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.92 145.96 11.97 26.68 1882.6�cwKL STRUCTURE 8 RESUOR .014 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.96 172.24 11.92 25.38 1791.1i XSECTION 12 RUNOFF .013 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.53 AA- 11.96 33.59 2507.1 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .344 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.70 146.92 12.50 194.92 566.1 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 146.94 12.50 192.95 552.2 TR20 XEQ BARTLETT BROOK MOOEL(1984.CONDITONS) HARBOR INN-POSTDEVEL. JOB 1 SUMMARY REV 05/02/83 CALIBRATED BASED ON MAY 27-28, 1985 RAINSTORM PAGE 17 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA 0 COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HP) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 5 RESVOR .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 147.66 12.50 198.50 553.8 XSECTION 13 REACH .358 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 132.64 12.60 198.50 553.8 XSECTION 13 RUNOFF .015 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.60 .88- 11.99 20.93 1395.3 XSECTION 13 ADDHYD .373 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.71 132.65 12.60 200.98 538.1 STRUCTURE 6 ADDHYD 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.48 124.10 12.63 333.99 332.5 STRUCTURE 6 RESVOR 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.49 123.95 12.82 312.29 310.9 XSECTION 14 REACH 1.004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.48 103.75 12.92 312.29 310.9 3. PLANNING COKIMISSION (1�g3--�& q 1'J8_4 property and that a performance bond J t L1 kC Z �� the installation of a pipe under the sid L1 ; City Encineer. ~ '� -t 5. That the construction of a )eriod from the date of the applicat 6. The parking spaces for the on the final plan and the number sha --Vaw vS Lr d ante. 7. This approval shall expire Mrs. Maher seconded the motion. Mr. Mona noted that if the bui perhaps a different expiration period_ it would be reasonable to set a time limit for the entire completion and perhaps take another look at the plan, in case circumstances have changed in the meantime. He noted that if no time limit were put on the plan, the applicant would always have the right to build the front part, and even if conditions had changed dramatically, the Commission could have no say in the construction. Mr. Lamphere said Vermont Gas had to know it could build the office area and that an expiration date would be a problem for them. Mr. Ward felt approval of the site plan would give Vermont Gas a vested right to build, no matter how long it took them. Mr. Poger did not believe conditions would change drastically in this area, but felt the Commission should protect itself against possible disaster. Mr. Ward did not feel that could be done. He felt that once a permit was issued for the land use, it was grandfathered. Mr. Jacob pointed out that the Commission had never done this to any other applicant and Mr. Belter noted that if the applicant had not told the Commission he intended to build in phases, they would not have known. Mr. Mona asked about subjecting phase 2 to site -plan approval if it came in later than a certain date. Mr. Ward advised against a time limit. Mr. Burgess was not sure the building should be grandfathered forever. He felt a reasonable time limit could be set. Mr. Mona moved to amend the motion so that stipulation '` would read as follows: "Phase 1 o erational center a� royal shall expire in 6 months - Phase 2 headquart ers is subject to Planning Commission review if not started March 15, 1994 Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. Mr. Poger asked whether this was something the Commission would approve, and Messrs. Belter and Jacob and Mmes. Maher and Hurd said they would not. Mr. Poger ruled that since 4 members would vote no, it seemed futile to continue with it. Messrs. Mona and Burgess withdrew their motion and second. The motion carried with Mr. Ilona voting no on the principle of concern over the length of time. Continue site plan application of LTH Associates, Inc., for lot #9, Bartlett ?foods Development, construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. office complex. Mr. Davis was now present to represent the applicants. He said storm drainage would now go down the Swale. The number of parking spaces will meet the requirements. The Commission felt an area should be provided for a dumpster. Mr. Davis said they would have to protect the bank at the rear of the building very carefully as they constructed the building. It was also noted that Mr. Ward wanted snow fencing to be put up to protect the trees. This building will contain professional offices. Mr. Jacob moved that the ::Louth Burlington Planning Commission grant site 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 1,, 1984 plan approval for the application of LTH Associates, Inc., Mr. John Larkin, for lot #9 of the Bartlett Wood s developmen locate on ar or View I,oadror construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. professional office building, as depicted bn a plan entitled "Ilew Professional Office Building - L^1H Associates", dated March 1984 prepared by Erik Davis Architects, with the following stipulations: 1. That a performance bond be posted in the amount of $20 000 for site improvements and $8,000 for landscapingt prior to issuance of a permit. 2. the use not exceed That the tree line located on the northerly proper_ty_be protected of snow fence during construction and that the removal of trees n distance greater than ten ki0 feet from the rear of the buildi 3. That the_handicapNed parking s_oaces be reduced to two and that they be properly signed. 4. That the sidewalk be constructed across the driveway, according to the City Engineer's specifications. 5. The'drawin shall '.be.revised:to show a.space for a dumpster or trash collection area without taking away any of the present parking spaces. 6. This approval expires in 6 months. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion. Mr. Poger asked what the city could do if the applicant did not protect the trees, as he was asked to do, and was told the city had the power to deal with such situations. The motion carried unanimously. Site plan application of Alan Palmer for lot #3, Muddy Brook Industrial Park for construction of a 6,000 sq ft industrial building No one was present to represent the applicant, so Mr. Jacob moved to continue the site plan application of Alan Palmer until March 27, 1984 at City Hall at 7:30 pm. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion and all voted for it. Other business Mr. Ward said that at the last Zoning Board meeting Mrs. Maher had suggested a joint meeting of the Board and the Commission and a tentative date of March 20th had been set. Three members said they would be unable to make that meeting. Cor„missoh Mrs. Maher said that at the last Commission meeting they had been told that the Board wanted an indication of how the Commission felt about the variances which had been requested in regard to University Mall's expansion. She said the Commission had not been mentioned at the Board's meeting, and that the plans the Board saw were different from those reviewed by the Commission. They are no longer requesting a variance on the stream. Mrs. Maher felt that given the scope of this development and the impact it will have on the city, the two boards should try to cooperate. She did not want to tell the Board what to do, but felt they could be better informed. Mr. Ward noted that the Commission was on record with regard to its feelings about the variances requested. The minutes of the Commission meeting discussing this were given to all Board members. Mr. Ward felt the applicant had listened to the Commission's comments and responded to them. ERIK A. DAVIS • ARCHITECT 109 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 • TELEPHONE (802) 658-4696 Gentlemen: We are sending you the following items Date Project No. Project �- i herewith D under separate cover Items transmitted as follows: Items sent by: ❑ Approved Approved as noted Not approved Resubmit for approval Furnish corrected copies For your files a Our messenger F]Your messenger class mail By: ca n e-, Date Received 2/21/84 Date Application Conpleted and Received BY BY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW r 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record LTH Associates, Inc. 1185 Shelburne road, South T'urlint�,n, Vermont 864-7444 (b) Applicant Srl!1-, (c) Contact Person Erik A. Davis, Architect 109 South Winooski Avenua, Burlington, Vt . 658- 4096 2) pRo1E&r Simw ADDRESS: Lot #9, Harbor View Road, South Burlington (Bartlett Prop) 3) PROPOSM USE Mt PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING 4) SIZE OF PROUECT (i.e., 1 of units,.floor area, etc.) . 10,000 Gross Square Feet 5) NUMER OF EMPLOOYM (full i part time) 46 estimated 61 Ci76T ESTIMATES: (a) ' i , (ir $ ,300 000. (b) Landscaping 8, 000. (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) $ 20,000. estimated 7) ESTIMATED P a=r C( 94MICN DATE November 1984 8) . ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in z out) 177 9) PEAK "OUR(S) OF• OPERATION 7-9-am. ' 10) PFAK DAYS OF OPERATION Monday -Friday (normal business days) City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 863-2882 658AW 7 958 August 22, 1983 Erik A. Davis 109 So. Winooski Ave. Burlington, VT. 05401 RE: LTH Associates, lot 9 Dear Mr. Davis: Regarding the office building proposed for lot 9, this is subject to_si#p plan_ _approval by the Planning Commission. A revised plan, drawn to a larger scale and conforming to Section 19.10 of the Zoning Regulations will be required. The next Planning Commission is scheduled for September 20, 1983 with an application deadline of September 13, 1983. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward Zoning Administrator Officer RW/df STATE OF VI:1;ivA0NT COUNTY OF CI.IITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BUR LINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of L.T.H. Associates, John Larkin, lot #9, Harbor View Road On the 13th of March 19 84 , the South Burlington Planning Commission approved or denied the request of L.T.H. Associates (Professional office complex) for site plan review under Section 19.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations based on the folloviinq findings: 1, TRAFFIC ACCESS - Access as proposed is adequate, only lot located on northerly side of Harbor View Road. Driveway will meet commercial design standards 2. CIRCULATION AND PARKING - Adequate handicapped parking, parking meets minimum standards. Circulation is acceptable. 3. LANDSCAPING & SCREFNING - Existing trees to northerly property line will be saved. Landscaping as proposed meets minimum standards. � Al --)ouin Dur1111y Lon I'la nninq ommission MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission grant site plan approval for the application of L.T.H. Associates, Inc., Mr. John Larkin for lot #9 of the Bartlett Woods development, located on Harbor View Road for construction of a 10,000 square foot professional office buildings, as depicted on a plan entitled "New Professional Office Building - L.T.H. Associates" dated March 6, 1984 prepared by Erik A. Davis Architects, with the following stipulations: 1) That a performance bond be posted in the amount of $20,000 for site improve- ments and $8,000 for landscaping, prior to issuance of a permit. 2) That the tree line located on the northerly property be protected by the use of snow fence during construction and that the removal of trees not exceed a distance greater than ten (10) feet from the rear of the building. 3) That the handicapped parking spaces be reduced to two and that they be properly signed. 4) That the sidewalk be constructed across the driveway, according to the City Engineer's specifications. 5) That this approval expires in 6 months. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 3/9/84 3) Palmer, lot #3, Muddy Brook Industrial Park Plan has been revised to include the concerns expressed by the City Engineer and this office. See no problems with this plan. 4) L.T.H. Associates,,lot #9, Bartlett Woods Plans has been revised to include the concerns expressed by City Engineer. His only concern deals with the sidewalk which should be continuous across the driveway. Curb work will require bonding. 5) Vermont Gas Systems, 85 Swift Street This application was before the Zoning Board of Adjustment on February 27, 1984. The operational center (10,000 square feet) and the outside storage area was approved by the Board. The area is zoned C-1 District which permits the office complex (7500 square feet). The lot contains 4.2 acres with a C.O. District running north and south. A 15' gravel access drive is proposed to the area being used for outside storage. Crossing the C.O. District is allowed (section 3.301). The rear portion of the lot will be fenced, which involves removal of existing trees, most are grey birch or popular which do not appear worth saving. An existing cluster of evergreens and birch located on the easterly side of lot can be saved. During construction these should be protected with snow fence. Within the C.O. District some of the trees will be removed, most all shurb trees. I see no problems providing the area is restored. To the rear of Mr. Aruzza (area of outside storage) existing a large maple tree, the best tree on the entire site. Mr. Aruzza request that this tree be saved. In addition, a cedar hedge is being proposed in order to screen the outside storage area. Mr. Aruzza agrees with this screening. No other residential unit abuts this site. Landscaping is the major issue. Credit can be applied to the maple tree along with the cluster of pine located to the east of the site. The total land- scaping required is $12,750. Performance bond for landscaping should be $10,000 with $2,750 credit applied to existing trees. Section 18.101 (zoning regulations) requires that the Swift Street right-of-way be increased to 66 feet, existing being 50 feet. A additional 8 feet must be secured along the frontage of this property. Should the Planning Commission agree to piping the drainage ditch across the frontage of this property, then it should consider installation of a sidewalk. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manag4r Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 3/9/84 4(L.T.H OfficeBuildin , Harbor View Road 1. Sidewalk shall be continuous across the driveway. 5) Vermont Gas Systems, Inc., Swift Street 1. Consideration should be given to the installation of a storm drain system across the frontage. 2. Any lighting of the pipe storage area or service yard shall be low height and intensity type so as not to distract the adjacent residential area. 3. Since this is a developing commercial area a sidewalk across the frontage should be considered especially if it is decided to install a drainage system across the frontage. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 28, 1984 by using a density of 7 on 2.85 acres of land, which would leave 37,026 sq. ft. for the office buildings. Mr. Mona wanted to see the acreages involved shown on the plan, but Mr. Poger noted that if this were treated as a PCD, there would be no lot lines. He asked whether the Commission felt these apartment units would be compatible with the area and no one objected to it. He asked about the density, and Mr. Mona felt it was a lot of units. Mr. Benson said a percentage of the units would be reserved for people with B(Pp of the median income in the area. The units are suggested to be 900 sq. ft., mostly with two bedrooms. He hoped to have some elderly tenants. He noted that the location was close to a park and to all kinds of services within walking distance. The bus also runs near here. Mr. Benson noted that he had to have 15 units to make the project viable financially. He said that under VHFA, he would have the rentals at 82`,w of the market, locked in for 10 years. The details have not all been worked out yet. Mrs. Hurd came in at this point. Mrs. Maher said she would like the plan better without the first 4 unit building. It was noted that in case of parking overflow, the spaces for the office buildings would be available, especially at night and on weekends. Consider request of John Crabbe, Jr and Terry Ross to extend Oakwood Drive as private road per Section 19.20 of the Zoning Regulations Mr. Crabbe noted that the sub -base was already existing to extend the road. Both drives would come off the existing Oakwood cul-de-sac and be private drives. Ross would have frontage on Glen Road and Crabbe on Oakwood Drive. Mr. Crabbe said he would plow his section of road. Mr. Ward said there were 2 more lots there which would have to be served by this private drive if they were developed. Mr. Poger said there should be only 3 lots served by the private drive. Mr. Mona wanted to see a better picture of the area, showing both houses. He felt the action the Commission would take tonight should be defined in one place. Mr. Poger saw no problem with the extension. Mrs. Maher moved to grant the request of John Crabbe, Jr., and Terry Ross to extend Oakwood Drive as a private road per Section 19.20 of the Zoning Regulations in order to serve lots 114 and 119. It is further stipulated that no more than a total of 3 lots shall be served off this private road extension of Oakwood Drive. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion, and it carried with Mr. Mona voting no. Site plan application of Alan Palmer for lot jt36 Muddy Brook Industrial Park for construction of a 6,000 sq ft industrial building Mr. 'Hard said Mr. Palmer had been unable to make it back to the city for the meeting, and had requested a delay. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the site plan application of Alan Palmer until March 13, 1984 at 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mr. Mona seconded the motion and all voted aye. to plan application o �LTH Associates) Inc. for lot #9 Bartlett '.Foods velonment. construction of a 10,UUU sq ft. office complex Mr. Erik Davis said the building would have two floors and be under 35' tall. Some grading will be done on the site. It is planned to have professional offices in the building. 40 parking spaces are shown. The lot is heavily PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 28, 1984 treed, and Mr. Ward wanted to be sure that as many trees as possible be saved. Those to be saved should be protected with a snow fence. Mr. bona noted that there would be parking spaces right to the property lines on the sides of the lot, but it was noted that the land on both sides of the lot could not be developed due to the rough terrain. The sidewalk exists now, but does not show on the plan. I,.r. Davis had no problems with the City Mana,;er/Engin::er's memo on the plan. YIr. Davis said that if there were a basement in the building, it would only be used for utilities - it would riot be part of the floor area. The building is not designed yet. Mr. Poger felt the Commission should see the design and that the curbs, sidewalk and grading changes should be shown. Mr. Davis noted that if they were allowed to discharge water into the swale, that might change the grading plans. Mr. Burgess moved to continue the site plan application of LTH Associates until March 13, 1984 at 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mrs. Hurd seconded the motion and all voted for it. Other Business Mr. Mona noted that the Zoning Board, on February 13, had approved an apartment in a home on Prouty Parkway. He questioned whether the Board was "doing its thing" while the Commission was considering the matter of what will happen with character of the neighborhood, etc. He asked when the Commission would consider that matter again and Mr. Poger replied that it could not be until the Commission had a full-time Planner. Mr. Ward noted that the variance had been for 100 sq. ft., which is all the lot was short for a duplex. That is a permitted use. Mr. Poger asked about the application for an office use on the corner of Mills Avenue and Williston Road and was told it had been denied. He noted that that area of the city had been discussed extensively and said he was reluctant to see it rezoned piece by piece through variances. He would rather have a rational discussion of the area. He mentioned having the two boards get together, or the Commission having a discussion of the area and the Zoning Board abiding by the Commission's decision. Mr. Ward noted that the Board had boked at that lot many times in the past, and nothing has worked on it. Mr. Poger mentioned that a request could be made for a zone change. Sketch plan review for Brassard Automotive for a two lot subdivision 1255 Williston Road Mr. Spitz represented the Brassards. He said the original subdivision around 1978 had created the A1's lot and a back lot, which houses Midas today. The back lot was more land than Midas needed, so they came in with a plan for an office building, which involved a land swap. The Commission felt that a road was needed through this land to connect to the Corporate Circle road, but if that is done, Midas would have to move its sign, which would then be off - premise, and that is a problem for them. They want to keep the sign where it is now. Mr. Spitz said Midas wanted its front property line to be 300' and they would like to square off the lot for additional parking area. They might want to add 3 bays to the building and they want to sell the land they have no use for. Mr. Spitz asked whether the city still wanted the road and was told it did. The exact location for connection to the Corporate Circle road would have to be worked out. The School Board has agreed in principle that a corner of its land could be used if needed. DW 2/24/84 MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission grant site plan approval for the application of L.T.H. Associates, Inc., Mr. John Larkin for lot #9 of the Bartlett Woods development, located on Harbor View Road for construction of a 10,000 square foot professional office buildings, as depicted on a plan entitled "New Professional Office Building - L.T.H. Associates" dated Febraury 21, 1984 prepared by Erik A. Davis Architects, with the following stipulations: 1) That a performance bond be posted in the amount of $20,000 for site improve- ments and $8,000 for landscaping, prior to issuance of a permit. 2) That the tree line located on the northerly property be protected by the use of snow fence during construction and that the removal of trees not exceed a distance greater than ten (10) feet from the rear of the building. 3) That the handicapped parking spaces be reduced to two and that they be properly signed. 4) That those concerns of the City Engineer (memo dated 2/24/84) be included on the final plat. 5) That this approval expires in 6 months. I, MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 2/24/84 4) Crabbe/Ross, lots 114 & 119, Oakwood Drive These lots are a part of an old recorded subdivision which was never completed. If additional building is to take place the street should be completed across the entire frontage of the buildings lots and terminated with an adequate temporary turnaround or if there are no remaining lots a permanent turnaround built. A plan incorporating these lots into the remaining R-4 zoned area should be prepared. 5) Muddy Brook Industrial Park, Palmer Heights 1. Right turn (entrance) into driveway will be difficult unless curb radii is increased based on vehicles anticipated. An improved alignment would be plac- ing the entrance off center of the cul-de-sac. 2. A depressed concrete curb shall be constructed across the driveway entrance. 6) L.T.H. Office Building,$iarbor View Road 1. The storm drain system should outlet to the northerly ravine instead of the street storm drain systems. Plan shows the easterly lot drainage connected to the sanitary sewer, this is prohibited. 2. Driveway entrance shall have a depressed concrete curb. 3. There is an existing sidewalk along the frontage of this property it should be shown on the plan. Memorandum Next week's agenda items 2/24/84 Page 2 5) Palmer, lot #3, Muddy Brook Industrial Park Palmer is proposing a 6,000 square foot structure for warehouse use. The lot in question is located off the cul-de-sac. Two access drives are proposed, one off the cul-de-sac (see City Engineer's comments regarding the location of curb cut). Second access is a connector between the existing lots. Due to topography of lot #3 the second access will provide grade access to the build- ing. The westerly side will be 4 feet higher and provide loading dock areas. A 33 foot right-of-way is proposed to the airport property, this right-of-way is in disucssion stage with applicant and Airport staff. Landscaping as proposed is less than the minimum required, however, the lot has existing ever- greens which could be saved, a credit could be applied. The upper level parking spaces do not meet minimum standards. A revised plan must be submitted to include suggested revisions. The proposed sign is presently located within the right-of-way, this is prohibited. On site sewer is proposed, no problems with this. 6) L.T.H. Associates, lot #9, Harbor View Road The proposed office complex meets or exceeds the minimum requirements. Only issue of concern is removal of existing trees, the northerly property line is heavily treed. Developer should be required to protect the trees that are to remain by use of snow fence, only those trees necessary to allow to construction should be removed. The sewer allocation for this building should be 500 g.p.d. The Bartlett Bay treatment plant is nearing capacity, approximately 13,000 g.p.d. uncommitted. Applicant has proposed four handicapped parking spaces, two meet the minimum standards. Landscaping plan as proposed provides for large caliper trees (4" - 6" in size) these trees will exceed 20 feet in height, this is different than normal, most developers plant 6 to 10 foot trees. Bond for landscaping is required in the amount of $8,000. Other site improvements such as sewer and water connections and installation of storm sewer systems must be bonded, this amount is $20,000. 7) Brassard Automotive, 1255 Williston Road Proposed two lot subdivision, lot #1 contains 1.2 acres presently occupied by Midas Muffler, lot #2 3.0 acres undeveloped. Major issues, connector road to Corporate Circle. Second concern,existing private street being completed to City standards. Should the street become public the Midas Muffler sign located at the intersection of Williston Road must be relocated, this is a major concern of Mr. Brassard. The former planner informs that the connector to Corporate Circle has already been conveyed by South Burlington Realty. How the two right-of-ways will connect must be finalized, this may require relocation across South Burlington Realty land which will result in a amendment to the legal doc- uments'presently on file with City Hall. .4�v September 30, 1933 Erik A. Davis 109 South Winooski Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: LTH Associates, professional office building lot if9 Dear Mr. Davis; Be advised that the proposed office building for lot #9 does not conform, to all provisions within the City's zoning : regulations. Without total conformance I doubt that your proposal will receive approval by the Planning CoaYnission. You do have the option of appealing to the Zoning Board of Adjustment, however, being a new development, a variance would be difficult to obtain. Section 19.103 of the regulations provide for one driveway per lot, you are proposing two. Section 19.104 requires that 30% of the front yard be landscaped, with a continuous buffer strip of 15 feet, your plan, with the exception of the 15'xl5' planters, occupies the entire front yard. The n-tAiriLup, coverage is 70% for building, parking and storage area. Your cover- age is 75%. Before site plan review is scheduled these issues must be dealt with. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Ve'ry truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative officer RW/mg cc: John Larkin Date Received 1 `) d S BA - Date Application Completed and Received By By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIBq 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record L.T.If ASSOCIATES Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont (b) Applicant SAI1; (c) Contact Person ERIK A. DAVIS ARCHITECT 109 South Winooski Avenue, Burlington, Vt . 658-4696 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: BARTLE'T'T DEVELOPTTuNT off Shelburne Road, South Burlington. 3) PROPOSED USES): PROFESSIOPIAL OFFICE BUILDING 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., # of units, floor area, etc.) 16,200 Gross Square feet. (Approx 13,500 ,,sqf net) 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 72 estimated maximum 6) COST ESTIMATES: ��}} (a) Buildings ,480 ,000 est. (b) Landscaping 5,000 vu �- (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) '20,000 est. 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 1,arch ;Wf), 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 238 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION 7 ` 9 A. . 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION %ionday - Friday (normal business days.) EAIK A. DAVIS • ARCHITECT 109 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 054E01 • TELEPHONE (802) 658-4696 To: 1,1r . Richard Ward Date .c.ept . 14, 1983 Project No South Burlington Planning, CommissiWoj,,, Gentlemen: LTH Professional Buil.clin- BartlettDevelopment South Burlin-ton, Vt. We are sending you the following items " x herewith ❑under separate cover No. Description Remarks Application .for Site Plan Review Please attach to material - delivered ivere yesterday. Items transmitted as follows: ❑ Approved ❑ Approved as noted ONot approved ❑ Resubmit for approval Furnish corrected copies For your files Items sent by: OOur messenger Your messenger El 11 By: class mail 'EKIK Ae DAVIS *AECHITECT 109 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 • TELEPHONE (802) 658.4696 To: Richard Ward South Burlington Planning Co:rr�ission Gentlemen: Date 13 Sept. 1983 Project No Project LTH Professional Ailding South Burlington, Vt. We are sending you the following items a herewith ❑ under separate cover No. Description Remarks Site Plan and Utilities Plan (Krebs End Lansing) For Site Plan Review Items transmitted as follows: F] Approved Approved as noted F]Not approved 1-1 Resubmit for approval Furnish corrected copies For your files Items sent by: Our messenger Your messenger class mail By: Cctober 5, 1983 Erik A. Davis 109 South Winooski Avenue Burlington, Verniont 05401 Re: UIPH professional buildings Dear Mr. Davis: Section 19.104 landscaping requirements sub section b provides that not irtore than 30% of the area of the requireO front yard shall be used for driveways and parking, the balance shall be suitably landscaped. The front yard set- back within this district is forty (40) feet, the area of front yard for this lot is 12,000 square feet. Your proposal does not conform, therefore you Trust revise the plan or you may wish to appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjust- ment. Please let ine know, it any case site plan review will be rescheduled. Verb truly, Richard Ward, Zoning PkIministrative officer IU/ncg ' EAIK Ae DAVISS ARCHITECT 109 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 a TELEPHONE (802) 658-4696 To: Richard 4Jard 3 October 1983 Date Project No `� Burlington Planning Conuv :.issi*�ject LTH Professional Building Bartlett; Development South Burlington, Vt. Gentlemen: We are sending you the following items a herewith ❑ under separate cover No. Description Remarks Site Plan Application for Site Plan review Items transmitted as follows: ❑ Approved Approved as noted Not approved Resubmit for approval Furnish —_ corrected copies 01 For your files Items sent by: Uur messenger nYour messenger 11 By: :lass mail Date Received BY, .Date Application Completed and Rebeived BY BY CITY OF SOUTH BURLING70N APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 1) NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NLPWER OF: (a) Owner of Record L.T.H. ASSOCIATES South Burlington, Vermont M Applicant S 01LE 'low (=ntac�tftr= 109 South Winooski Avenue, Burlington, Vt. 658-4696 4T off Shelburne Rd, South Burlin-,ton, 2) PRQJWr STREET ADDRESS. BARTIE11T DEVELOP1,EIT 3) PROPOSED USE(%r PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDIEG ,4) SIZE OF PFPJF= (i.e., # of units, floor area, etc.) 12"000 Gross "quare Feet (Approx. 101125 sqf net.) 5) NUMBER OF EKPWYEES (full b part time) 54 Estirnated N!axinium 6,COST ESTIMATES: 360,000 (b) Lmdscapinq 9,200 (C) All Other Site Improvements (i.e.,, curb work) w20' 000 estimated 7) ESTIMATED PKUBLT CCMPLETIoN DATE 1"larch 1984 ,8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in b out) 173 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF -OPERATION 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 7-9 A.1M. I'londay-Friday (normal business days) PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlin' 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMON' May Geoff Greene AEC 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Larkin Office, Lot #9, Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Greene: This letter serves to confirm that the City of South Burlington approved the plans for a 20,000 square foot office building on lot #9, Harbor View Road. This project is in conformance with the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. The City made a sewer allocation of 10,000 gallons per day to serve this development. There is adequate capacity at the Bartlett's Bay Treatment Plant to handle this amount. There is also adequate water to serve this facility. I hope this is helpful. questions. JBL/mcp CC: John Larkin Please call me if you have any Sincerely, ,J cv�,2� , 4� L Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner R PLANNING COMMISSION \ 5 A GUST'1986 PAGE 5 right-of-way is removed. The restriction on use of the rear lot shall be recorded as a deed restriction as approved the City Attorney. '- 6. It is the applicant's responsibility to record the final Plat with the City Clerk within 90 days or this _approval is null and void. The plat must be approved b the City Planner and signed by the -Chairman or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. _ Ms. Peacock seconded, - and '"the motion Passed'5-1 with Mrs. Hurd voting against. Mr. Dooley then moved to amend.the motion to removed the wording in the opening paragraph from "and 4 page set..." to "dated June 1986". Ms. Peacock seconded, and the motion passed 5-1, Mrs. Hurd opposing. 7. Continue site Plan application of John Larkin for construction of a 20,000 sg_ ft. office building on lot #9 of Bartlett Subdivision, Harbor View Rd. J.Leview of erosion control report) The Wagner, Heindel & Noyes report indicates no retention necessar but they recommended some serious erosion control methods uch a haybales, fencing, swales, etc. Mrs. Maher felt that there should be some evergreens and that crabapple trees should be removed. Mr. Blanchard agreed to this. Mr. Larkin agreed to..contribute to the intersection improvement :_:..:.... Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission approve the site Plan application of R.G. Blanchard a ent for John Larkin, for construction of a 20 000 s . ft. 2-1 2 story` office building on -lot 49, Har ew �dj2p3cted--on''a plan entitled "Site Plan and Profile - Proposed Office Building for Larkin Real Estate," prepared 12y R.G. Blanchard, Design Associates, revised on _September 11 1984 with the following stipulations: 1. An $11,000 bond for landscaping and a $20,000 bond for sewer water and storm drain improvements shall be osted prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The _Planning Commission approves 62 parking spaces; of these, 13 are compact car size. The area designated for 18 future spaces shall be left undisturbed and subject to the right of the Planning Commission to require that this area be paved or gravelled and used for parking.; A bond shall be posted in an amount determined 12y.the City Engineer, for con- f structicn of these at a later date. 3. A 74"+- fence and hay bales shall be used alon the entire end western edge of the site during the entire c01isc:ti, un period. Hay bales shall be placed in at least 2 locations within the small drainage swale to the west of the site. 4. Runoff from the roof of the building shall be directed to the sc;L. - ,Just west of the property. A grassy swale shall be used _o, .around slopes of less than 4% and a stone lined ditch f(r slopes greater than 4%. R_ip rap shall be sized and provided as needed in the drainage swale. 5. A contribution of $1,463 shall be made toward the Shalburi�e Rd. intersection improvement fund, based on the 57 trip ends generated � this office. 6. A sewer allocation of 1000 q�d is made in accordance with the Bartlett Treatment Plant. The $2.50 per gallon harge shall be paid rp for to permit. 7. S_umped catch basins or other suitable means to remove sdiment from stormwater runoff as approved� the City Engineer. shall be provided. I%f 8. The landscaping plan shall be amended, as approved �2y the City Planner, to substitute appropriate size evergreens for the crabapple trees currently provided. 9. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Belter seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 8. Consider sketch plan application of Alan Gigure for a 2- lot subdivision With one existing house and a 6-unit multi- famil building at 120 Airport Parkway Mrs. Lafleur reminded the Commission that a 4-lot subdivision has been approved and a city street required. Mr. Gigure does not want a city street, so he has a new sketch plan for a 6-unit building and the existing house. Mrs. Maher asked if this will be a condo development with covenants. Mr. Gigure said it would. Mrs. Lafleur noted that Mr. Szymanski is concerned with the common drive between single family and multi f:.mily developments. She noted this is considered a major subdivision because it has multi -family dwellings. Mr. Dooley said he would like to know about the surrounding .neighborhood. Mrs. Maher said she felt a 6-family unit is k Y PLANNING COMMISSION 5 AUGUST 1986 PAGE 5 right-of-wav is removed. The restriction on use of the rear lot shall be recorded the City Attorney. as a deed restriction as approved 6. It is the applicant's responsibility to record the final plat with the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plat must be approved �2y the City Planner and signed 12y the Chairman or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. Ms. Peacock seconded, and the motion passed 5-1 with Mrs. Hurd voting against. Mr. Dooley then moved to amend the motion to removed the wording in the opening paragraph from "and 4 page set..." to "dated June 1986". Ms. Peacock seconded, and the motion passed 5-1, Mrs. Hurd opposing. 7. Continue site plan application of John Larkin for construction of a 20,000 sq. ft. office building on lot 09 of Bartlett Subdivision, Harbor View Rd. (review of erosion control report) The Wagner, Heindel & Noyes report indicates no retention necessary but they recommended some serious erosion control methods such a haybales, fencing, swales, etc. Mrs. Maher felt that there should be some evergreens and that crabapple trees should be removed. Mr. Blanchard agreed to this. Mr. Larkin agreed to contribute to the intersection improvement fund. Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of R.G. Blanchard, agent for John Larkin, for construction of a 20,000 sq. ft. 2-1/2 story office building on lot #9L Harbor View Rd, as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan and Profile - Proposed Office Building for Larkin Real Estate," prepared 12y R.G. Blanchard Design Associates, revised on September 17, 1984 with the following stipulations: 1. An $11,000 bond for landscaping and a $20,000 bond for sewer water and storm drain improvements shall be posted prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The Planning Commission approves 62 parking spaces; of these, 13 are compact car size. The area designated for 18 future spaces shall be left undisturbed and subject to the right of the Planning Commission to require that this area be paved or gravelled and used for parking. A bond shall be posted in an amount determined by the City Engineer, for con- PLANNING COMMISSION 5 AUGUST 1986 PAGE 6 struction of these at a later date. 3. A silt fence and hay bales shall be used along the entire northern and western edge of the site during the entire construction period. Hay bales shall be placed in at least 2 locations within the small drainage swale to the west of the site. 4. Runoff from the roof of the building shall be directed to the swale just west of the property. A grassy swale shall be used for ground slopes of less than 4% and a stone lined ditch for slopes greater than 4%. R—ip rap shall be sized and provided as needed in the drainage swale. 5. A contribution of $1,463 shall be made toward the Shalburne Rd. intersection improvement fund, based on the 57 trip ends generated by this office. 6. A sewer allocation of 1000 gpd is made in accordance with the Bartlett Bay Treatment Plant. The $2.50 per gallon charge shall be paid prior to permit. 7. Sumped catch basins or other suitable means to remove sediment from stormwater runoff as approved by the City Engineer shall be provided. AO--' 8. The landscaping plan shall be amended, as approved by the City Planner, to substitute appropriate size evergreens for the crabapple trees currently provided. 9. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Belter seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 8. Consider sketch plan application of Alan Gigure for a 2- lot subdivision with one existing house and a 6-unit multi- family building at 120 Airport Parkway Mrs. Lafleur reminded the Commission that a 4-lot subdivision has been approved and a city street required. Mr. Gigure does not want a city street, so he has a new sketch plan for a 6-unit building and the existing house. Mrs. Maher asked if this will be a condo development with covenants. Mr. Gigure said it would. Mrs. Lafleur noted that Mr. Szymanski is concerned with the common drive between single family and multi family developments. She noted this is considered a major subdivision because it has multi -family dwellings. Mr. Dooley said he would like to know about the surrounding neighborhood. Mrs. Maher said she felt a 6-family unit is —*nut. Vurttngton Fire Department 575 Donut �*trcet �u�ztlt +!�urliit�i�it, �lrrit�.f�o. ;i�. rb: OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658.7960 May 8,1987 Mr. John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Larkin, - Plans have been reviewed by the fire department on the proposed office building that you wish to build on Harbor View Road in South Burlington. At this time I am pleased to inform you that with the changes made on the road way in the parking lot for fire equipment I do not see a problem with this project. I would like to thank you for your cooperation in trying to make South Burlington a safe community to work in. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Sincerely ames W. Goddette Sr. Chief NORM COUNTRY i PLX NKING f & John Larkin LTH ASSOCIATES, INC. 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear John, 15 Morse Drive Essex Jct., Vermont 05452 (802) 878-0305 May 11, 1987 In response to a request from your office, I would like to clarify traffic volume estimates from my September 8, 1986 report for the Harbor View Office Building. Through the date of that report, approvals had been granted for 53 single-family and duplex units, 89 multi -family units, 3 mixed commercial buildings and a 200 room hotel and restaurant. Trip gen- eration estimates are as follows : TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES APPROVED DEVELOPMENT THROUGH SEPTEMBER, 1986 "BARTLETT PROPERTY" A.M. Peak Hour Enter 173 Exit 131 Total 304 P.M. Peak Hour Enter 162 Exit 161 Total 323 Average Weekday: 3484 In previous reports, I have estimated that 90% of commercial traffic, 50% of residential traffic and none of the hotel traffic will pass through the key Route 7/Harbor View Road intersection. Total current estimated traffic through this intersection is given in table 4 of the September, 1986 report. page 2 Trip generation estimates for the proposed office building are based on rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers. TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES PROPOSED LTH OFFICE BUILDING A.M. Peak Hour : Enter 39 Exit 7 Total 46 P.M. Peak Hour Enter 7 Exit 37 To to 1 44 Average.Weekday:. 246 An estimated 90% of office traffic will pass through Route 7/Har- bor View Road intersection. I hope this information is sufficient to clarify any questions that have been raised. Sincerely, David H. Spitz North Cotmtry Planning • 15 Morse Dl ive • Essex Jct., VT. SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 John M. Rude, Chief Telephone (R02) 658-1050 May 27, 1987 Susan Dimick Larkin Realty 1185 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ms. Dimick: I have reviewed the revised site plan for the proposed office building on Lot 9, Harbor View Road and have no objection to this project at this time. The project would not create an undue burden of the city services rendered by this department. Sincer ly, ohn M. Race •hief of Police JMR:mc PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 May 8, 1987 0 Geoff Greene AEC 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Larkin Office, Lot #9, Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Greene: This letter serves to confirm that the City of South Burlington approved the plans for a 20,000 square foot office building on lot #9, Harbor View Road. This project is in conformance with the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. The City made a sewer allocation of 10,000 gallons per day to serve this development. There is adequate capacity at the Bartlett's Bay Treatment Plant to handle this amount. There is also adequate water to serve this facility. I hope this is helpful. questions. JBL/mcp cc: John Larkin Please call me if you have any Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 199 Main St. WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404 (802) 655-3640 TO LA-&L Go' e=� r�crY F 6a--*-5,jei.t,Jc�r�,.� WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached El Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings J� Prints El Plans ❑ Copy of letter ,❑ Change order ❑ LREUMIM ors DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION RE: GvT CJ - f3A G T the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION fa THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: kFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY PRODUCT 240.2 ees Im, Groton, Mess 01471. SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. L1 n Last- -�q 0-aAb0 rVk ?C9 VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD 10 V.S.A., CHAPTER 151 ACT 250 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PREHEARING CONFERENCE 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 S§ 6083-6089 RE: LTH Associates Application #4C0526-5-EB c/o Richard A. Spokes, Esq. Spokes, Foley & Stitzel P.O. Box 986 Burlington, VT 05401 On August 31, 1987, an appeal was filed with the Environmental Board by LTH Associates through its attorney, Richard A. Spokes, Esq., from the District #4 Environmental Commission's decision dated August 6, 1987. The decision denied the Applicant's proposal to construct a 20,000 square foot office building on Lot #9 of a previously approved commercial subdivision off Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The Appellant objects to the Commission's Findings on Criteria 1 (E) and 4. In addition to participating in the appeal, any person or entity that participated in District Commission proceedings in this matter may file a cross -appeal pursuant to Board Rule 40(D) within 14 days of the issuance of this notice. The Chairman of the Board, or its duly authorized member, will meet with the parties or their representatives at a prehearing conference on Thursday, October 1, 1987, at 2:00 p.m. in the lst Foor Conference Room at Burlington City Hall in Burlington, Vermont. Those persons seeking to participate as parties (including "statutory" parties) in the hearing should attend the prehearing conference and should be prepared to identify issues, proposed witnesses and exhibits to be presented. Those seeking party status who are not able to attend the prehearing conference should notify the Board in writing by September 25, 1987, of their intention to appear, the issues they intend to address, and the witnesses and exhibits they intend to present. Pursuant to its jurisdiction and authority under 10 V.S.A. 6089, the Board will convene a preliminary hearing in this matter on Wednesday, September 30, 1987, at 4:00 p.m. at the Vermont Achievement Center, 88 Park Street, Rutland, Vermont. A hearing on the merits of the appeal will be scheduled at a later date. -2- Participants must contact the Board within two working days of receipt of this notice concerning any scheduling conflicts. Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this loth day of September, 1987. Stephanie J. Kaplan, Executive Officer, Environmental Board, Montpelier, Vermont 05602 - 828-3309. STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL CON P r P! AUG 3 ! 198 ` �11 7 �2 `;8Ui ,MENTAL 8GARD RE: LTH Associates Amendment Application 1185 Shelburne Road #4CO526-5, Findings of South Burlington, VT 05401 and Concludions of Law and Order, 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250) NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COMES, LTH ASSOCIATES, owner of Lot 9, Harbor View Road, South Burlington, Vermont, by and through its attorneys, Spokes, Foley & Stitzel, and appeals the Findings of Fact, Concludions of Law and Order of District Environmental Commission #4, dated August 6, 1987. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §6089(a), the appellant requests the Environmental Board to conduct a de novo hearing in regard to the District Commission's Findings in connection with criteria lE (streams) and 4 (erosion). The appellant believes that the District Commission's Findings in regard to these criteria were contrary to the evidence and based upon unsupported speculation and surmise. In addition, the appellant believes conditions imposed by the District Commission in regard to criterion 5 (transportation) were unwarranted, and thus the appellant requests a de novo hearing in regard to this criterion. The appellant states the following issues, among others, will be relevant at the de novo hearing: I. Whether the proposed development, whenever feasible, will maintain the natural condition of the adjacent stream, and whether the proposed develop went will endanger the health, safety or welfare of the public or of adjoining SPOKES, 'ELOLEY & STITZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW landowners. IURLINOTON, VERMONT SPOKES, FOLEY & STITZEL kTTORNEYS AT LAW IURLINGTON, VCRMONT 2. Whether the proposed development will cause unreasonable soil erosion or reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water so that a dangerous or unhealthy condition may result. Dated at Burlington, Vermont, this 26th day of August, 1987. S:POKES & STITZEL By: Richard A. Spokes P.O. Box 986 Burlington, VT 05402-0986 (802) 863-2857 -2- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Stephanie J. Kaplan, Executive Officer, Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on this loth day of September, 1987, to the following: LTH Associates by Richard A. Spokes, Esq. Spokes, Foley & Stitzel P.O. Box 986 Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington Councilmen by Hugh Marvin, Chairman 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Jane Lafleur, Planner 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Arthur R. Hogan, Jr., Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning and Development Commission Box 108 Essex Jct., VT 05452 Frederic Emigh, Esq. Representative, State Agencies Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street Center Building - 2d Floor Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR INFORMATION ONLY: Katherine Vose, Coordinator District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West St. Essex Jct., VT 05452 Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this loth day of September, 1987. By S L�t t Ct. & Stephanie . Ka lan Executive Officer Environmental Board ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD Rule 16. Prehearing Conferences (A) Purposes. The board or a commission acting through a duly authorized delegate may conduct such prehearing conferences, upon due notice, as may be useful in expediting its proceedings and hearings. The purposes of such prehearing conferences shall be to: (1) Clarify the issues in controversy; (2) Identify documents, witnesses and other offers of proof to be presented at a hearing by any party; and (3) Obtain such stipulations of parties as to issues, offers of proof and other matters as may be appropriate. (B) Preliminary Rulings. The convening officer, if a member of the board or district commission, may make such preliminary rulings as to matters of notice, scheduling, party status, and other procedural matters, including interpretation of these rules, as are necessary to expedite and facilitate the hearing process. However, any such ruling may be objected to by any interested party, in which case the ruling shall be reviewed and the matter resolved by the board or district commission. (C) Prehearing Order. The convening officer may prepare a prehearing order stating the results of the prehearing conference. Any such order shall be binding upon all parties to the proceeding who have received notice of the prehearing conference if it is forwarded to the parties at least five days prior to the hearing. However, the time requirement may be waived upon agreement of all parties to the proceeding; and the board or a district commission may waive a requirement of a prehearing order upon a showing of cause, filing a timely objection, or if fairness so requires (Amended, effective March 11, 1982). VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD 10 V.S.A., CHAPTER 151 ACT 250 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PREHEARING CONFERENCE 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 §� 6083-6089 RE: LTH Associates Application #4C0526-5-EB c/o Richard A. Spokes, Esq. Spokes, Foley & Stitzel P.O. Box 986 Burlington, VT 05401 On August 31, 1987, an appeal was filed with the Environmental Board by LTH Associates through its attorney, Richard A. Spokes, Esq., from the District #4 Environmental Commission's decision dated August 6, 1987. The decision denied the Applicant's proposal to construct a 20,000 square foot office building on Lot #9 of a previously approved commercial subdivision off Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The Appellant objects to the Commission's Findings on Criteria 1 (E ) and 4. In addition to participating in the appeal, any person or entity that participated in District Commission proceedings in this matter may file a cross -appeal pursuant to Board Rule 40(D) within 14 days of the issuance of this notice. The Chairman of the Board, or its duly authorized member, will meet with the parties or their representatives at a prehearing conference on Thursday, October 1, 1987, at 2:00 p.m. in the 1st Foor Conference Room at Burlington City Hall in Burlington, Vermont. Those persons seeking to participate as parties (including "statutory" parties) in the hearing should attend the prehearing conference and should be prepared to identify issues, proposed witnesses and exhibits to be presented. Those seeking party status who are not able to attend the prehearing conference should notify the Board in writing by September 25, 1987, of their intention to appear, the issues they intend to address, and the witnesses and exhibits they intend to present. Pursuant to its jurisdiction and authority under 10 V.S.A. 5 6089, the Board will convene a preliminary hearing in this matter on Wednesday, September 30, 1987, at 4:00 p.m. at the Vermont Achievement Center, 88 Park Street, Rutland, Vermont. A hearing on the merits of the appeal will be scheduled at a later date. -2- Participants must contact the Board within two working days of receipt of this notice concerning any scheduling conflicts. Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this loth day of September, 1987. Stephanie J. Kaplan, Executive Officer, Environmental Board, Montpelier, Vermont 05602 - 828-3309. SPOKES, FOLEY & STITZEL ATTORNEYS AT LAW IURLINOTON, VERMONT STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL CON 7"1 7u �T AUG 3 ! l987�. f,TAL BOAR RE: LTH Associates Amendment Application 1185 Shelburne Road #4CO526-5, Findings of South Burlington, VT 05401 and Concludions of Law and Order, 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250) NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COMES, LTH ASSOCIATES, owner of Lot 9, Harbor View Road, South Burlington, Vermont, by and through its attorneys, Spokes, Foley & Stitzel, and appeals the Findings of Fact, Concludions of Law and Order of District Environmental Commission #4, dated August 6, 1987. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. 56089(a), the appellant requests the Environmental Board to conduct a de novo hearing in regard to the District Commission's Findings in connection with criteria lE (streams) and 4 (erosion). The appellant believes that the District Commission's Findings in regard to these criteria were contrary to the evidence and based upon unsupported speculation and surmise. In addition, the appellant believes conditions imposed by the District Commission in regard to criterion 5 (transportation) were unwarranted, and thus the appellant requests a de novo hearing in regard to this criterion. The appellant states the following issues, among others, will be relevant at the de novo hearing: 1. Whether the proposed development, whenever feasible, will maintain the natural condition of the adjacent stream, and whether the proposed develop- ment will endanger the health, safety or welfare of the public or of adjoining landowners. SPOKES, FOLEY & STITZEL \TTORNEYS AT LAW i URLINGTON, V[RMONT 2. Whether the proposed development will cause unreasonable soil + erosion or reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water so that a dangerous or unhealthy condition may result. Dated at Burlington, Vermont, this 26th day of August, 1987. SPOKES OLEY & STITZEL By: — Richard A. Spokes P.O. Box 986 Burlington, VT 05402-0986 (802) 863-2857 -2- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Stephanie J. Kaplan, Executive Officer, Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on this loth day of September, 1987, to the following: LTH Associates by Richard A. Spokes, Esq. Spokes, Foley & Stitzel P.O. Box 986 Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington Councilmen by Hugh Marvin, Chairman 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Jane Lafleur, Planner 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Arthur R. Hogan, Jr., Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning and Development Commission Box 108 Essex Jct., VT 05452 Frederic Emigh, Esq. Representative, State Agencies Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street Center Building - 2d Floor Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR INFORMATION ONLY: Katherine Vose, Coordinator District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West St. Essex Jct., VT 05452 Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this loth day of September, 1987. By S 4-e. P (ti.&w A ka a ! & to Stephanie JJ. Kaplan Executive Officer Environmental Board ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD Rule 16. Prehearing Conferences (A) Purposes. The board or a commission acting through a duly authorized delegate may conduct such prehearing conferences, upon due notice, as may be useful in expediting its proceedings and hearings. The purposes of such prehearing conferences shall be to: (1) Clarify the issues in controversy; (2) Identify documents, witnesses and other offers of proof to be presented at a hearing by any party; and (3) Obtain such stipulations of parties as to issues, offers of proof and other matters as may be appropriate. (B) Preliminary Rulings. The convening officer, if a member of the board or district commission, may make such preliminary rulings as to matters of notice, scheduling, party status, and other procedural matters, including interpretation of these rules, as are necessary to expedite and facilitate the hearing process. However, any such ruling may be objected to by any interested party, in which case the ruling shall be reviewed and the matter resolved by the board or district commission. (C) Prehearing Order. The convening officer may prepare a prehearing order stating the results of the prehearing conference. Any such order shall be binding upon all parties to the proceeding who have received notice of the prehearing conference if it is forwarded to the parties at least five days prior to the hearing. However, the time requirement may be waived upon agreement of all parties to the proceeding; and the board or a district commission may waive a requirement of a prehearing order upon a showing of cause, filing a timely objection, or if fairness so requires (Amended, effective March 11, 1982). fine, ,State of Vermo LTi+ I L&Atx x Lzt -*9, 1-"Dr Vim IU Public Building Permit LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. PB-4-1245 Chapter 4, Public Buildings APPLICANT LTH Associates Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal ADDRESS 1185 Shelbuene Road Chapter 8, Water Supply So. Burlington, VT 05401 Exterior water and sewer service and site Foundation work only. This project, consisting of construction of a new office building (maximum 30 employees) with municipal water and sewer services located on lot 9, Harborview Road, South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4C0526-5. (2) This Permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to construction. (3) The project must be completed as shown on the "Site Plan, Proposed Office Building" dated July 1986 last revised 3/10/87; Sheet 21 "Details, Bartlett Property" dated 12/81 prepared by Robert Krebs, and which have been stamped APPROVED by the Division of Protection. No changes shall be made to the approved plan without prior written approval from the Agency of Environmental Conservation. (4) This Permit is limited to exterior water, sewer, and site and foundation work ONLY. Construction of the actual structure is limited, at this time, to foundation work only and does not include nor is permission granted for the installation of interior plumbing either above or below grade. (Please note, interior plumbing is defined to include waste and water piping beginning 3 feet outside of the foundation wall and extending into the building). Upon completion of the water, sewer, and site work, all work must stop on the project until written approval for additional work has been obtained from this office. (5) All conditions set forth in Permit number 4C0526, shall remain in effect except as amended or modified herein. WATER (6) The project is approved for connection to a municipal type water system approved by the Department of Health provided that all construction is in accordance with the approved plans and the Environmental Protection Rules, Effective September 10, 1982. SEWAGE (7) The project is approved for connection to a municipal sewage collection system. The work shall be done in accordance with the Environmental Protection Rules, Effective September 10, 1982. (8) The project is approved for connection to the Bartlett's Bay wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 450 gallons of sewage per day. Public Building Permit PB-4-1245 Page 2 PLUMBING (9) No construction of the building beyond the foundation as authorized by condition #4 above is permitted until complete and satisfactory plans for the interior plumbing and ventilation have been submitted to and approved by the Protection Division. Dated in the Village of Essex Junction, Vermont this 3rd day of April, 1987. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION ZX g':Vi< < Mary K./Clark Assistan Regional Engineer cc: Donald Robisky City of South Burlington Geoffrey W. Green Dept. of Health Dept. of Labor and Industry Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: JOHN LARKIN, project in South Burlington for the the construction of a 20,000 square foot, 2 1/2 story office building with municipal water and sewer on lot 9 within the prev. apprv. 70 acre residential/commercial development off of Shelburne Road. DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION IV APPLICATION 4CO526-5 April 30, 1987 Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Environmental Conservation, State of Vermont, in the above captioned matter. CRITERIA 1 and 4. Stormwate r runoff. A discharge permit from the Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering is necessary. The Department has received an application for a Temporary Pollution Permit, and is waiting for revised plans before making a final determination. CRITERION 4. Erosion Control. Topographical information is inadequate. However, there appears to be a steep gully into the stream. There should be an undisturbed buffer extending 50' back from the stream. This buffer should be delineated with fencing BEFORE commencement of construction. The Water Quality Division of the Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering requests that the District Environmental Commission include the following conditions in the Land Use Permit, if issued: 1. A professional engineer or other qualified person shall certify that the erosion control plan in the application contains site specific erosion control measures necessary to provide a level of protection at least equivalent to the measures outlined in the "Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites", and that the plan, if followed by applicant, will cause the project to meet the technical requirements of the Vermont Water Quality Standards. Page 2 4C0526-5 2. The applicant shall hire a professional engineer or other qualified person to assure that the certified erosion control plans are implemented, and shall cause this person to send periodic and final reports to the District Environmental Commission. 3. Applicant shall notify James Dodge, Environmental Investigator, Department of Water Resources (244-5674) when the project is begun so that timely site visits can be made to determine compliance with plans and permit conditions. CRITERION 8. Aesthetics. The visual effect of the construction is difficult to judge for lack of perspective information in applicant's plans. Landscaping possibilities appear to be extremely limited due the the constricted nature of the lot area. The Interagency Act 250 Review Committee recommends that the District Environmental Commission schedule a site visit to determine whether or not the project will have an undue impact on the surrounding landscape. CRITERION 9(F). Applicant should contact Dave Lamont at the Department of Public Service regarding air conditioning and lighting efficiency. I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Agency ENTRY OF APPEARANCE and PRE -HEARING COMMENTS was sent by U.S. Mail (postage prepaid) to all statutory parties. Done on this 30TH day of April, 1987 at Waterbury, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, Agency of Environmental Conservation by e e r is R. Emigh Land Use Attorney cc: All Parties State of Vermont. 2�� Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Stephanie Kaplan Environmental Board c/o State Office Post Office Montpelier Vermont 05602 RE: LTH - 4CO526-5-EB Dear Stephanie: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES 103 So. Main St. Center Building Waterbury, Vermont 05676 October 19, 1987 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY The Agency may call Rod Barber of the Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation. He would testify regarding trees and other vegetation. Sin ely, Frederic R. EaF1.gh Land Use Attorney FRE/sg cc: All Parties Rod Barber Jeff Cueto Regional Offices - Barre/ Essex Jct./ Pittsford/N. Springfield/ St. Johnsbury ��cu,6(-V act.,- a SPOKES, FO LEY & STI1 ZEL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 239 SOUTH UNION STREET P. 0. BOX 986 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0986 RICHARD A. SPOKES JAMES D. FOLEY STEVEN F. STITZEL RICHARD F. PETERSON, JR. 4802) 862-6451 (802) 863-2857 October 16, 1987 Stephanie J. Kaplan Executive Officer Environmental Board 58 East State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Re: LTH Associates Appeal No. 4CO526-5-EB Dear Stephanie: The following represent our final witness and exhibit lists: Robert Krebs, Civil Engineer Richard Doherty, Structural Engineer David Raphael, Landscape Architect Craig Heindel, Hydrogeologist In addition, Jeffrey Noyes, who is also with Wagner, Heindel & Noyes, may offer brief rebuttal testimony, if necessary. Exhibits 1. Plans and construction drawings by Krebs & Lansing, Consulting Engineers, Inc. including Site Plan, Grading Plan. 2. Construction drawing by Doherty Consulting Engineers, dated May 26, 1987, showing sheet piling details. 3. Photograph of sheet piling installation. 4. Two page exhibit describing site soil types. 5. Three page exhibit prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., entitled "Erosion Control and Construction Sequence." Stephanie J. Kaplan October 16, 1987 Page 2 6. Page 8.48 of Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook depicting construction details for haybale barrier installation. 7. October 14, 1987 letter from Craig Heindel to William Nedde of Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., setting forth analysis of erosion and sediment control plan. 8. Letters dated October 1, 1987 and October 7, 1987 from Don Hipes, District Conservationist, analyzing erosion and sediment control plan. 9. Temporary Discharge Permit. 10. Illustrative sections prepared by Landworks (David Raphael) showing existing conditions at top of streambank and options for site development. 11. Landworks narrative dated October 8, 1987. 12. Landscaping plan prepared by Landworks dated October 15, 1987. I will send copies of the exhibits to Frederic Emigh, Esq. on October 19th or October 20th. Very truly yours, Richard A. Spokes RAS:mil Enclosure CC: Jane I.aFleur for City of South Burlington City of South Burlington Planning Com. Arthur Hogan, Jr. for Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning Com. Frederic Emigh, Esq., Agency of Natural Resources State of Vermont CASE No. APPLICANT ADDRESS LAND USE PERMIT 4C0526-5-EB LA`VS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED LTH Associates 1185 Shelburne Road 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 South Burlington, VT 05401 (Act 250) The Vermont Environmental Board hereby issues Amended Land Use Permit #4C0526-5-EB pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Vol, 118, Page 275 of the South Burlington Land Records, as the subject of a deed to LTH Associates, the Permittee as Grantee. This permit specifically authorizes the Permittee to construct a 20,000 square foot office building on Lot #9 of a previously approved commercial subdivision off Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The Permittee, and its successors and assigns, are obligated by this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the terms and conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0526 as amended, except as amended hereby: 1. All the terms and conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0526 and amendments remain in full force and effect. 2. The project shall be completed as set forth in Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law #4C0526-5 and #4C0526-5-EB, in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Approved" and on file with the District Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the District Commission. 3. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittee confirms and agrees for itself, and its successors and assigns, that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and its successors and assigns. The granting of less than an undivided whole interest in this project is prohibited without prior written approval of the District Commission. 4. The District Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed in accordance with the terms of the permit. 5. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Public Building Permit #PB-4-1245 issued on April 3, 1987, by the Assistant Regional Engineer, Division of Protection, Agency of Environmental Conservation in compliance with the Environmental Protection Rules. No work beyond site work and foundation construction is permitted until a final Public Building Permit is obtained (file PB-4-1245). LTH Associates Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0526-5-EB Page 2 6. The Permittee, and its successors and assigns, shall install and maintain water -conserving plumbing fixtures, including but not limited to low -flush toilets, low -flow showerheads, and aerator -type or flow -restricted faucets. 7. This office building is approved for the following maximum cumulative impacts which may not be exceeded without the prior written approval of the District Commission: 80 parking spaces 450 gallons per day of water and wastewater 246 average daily vehicle trips 44 average peak hour vehicle trips. 8. The Permittee shall apply water or calcium chloride as necessary to control dust during construction and until vegetation is fully established. 9. Prior to the commencement of construction, the Permittee shall receive a final Discharge Permit (file No. D4-14-071) issued by the Agency of Natural Resources. 10. All stumps shall be disposed of at a state approved landfill. 11. The Permittee shall comply with Exhibits #2 and #4 for erosion control (plans and construction drawings by Krebs & Lansing, Consulting Engineers, Inc. entitled "Site Plan Proposed Office Building" dated July, 1986 last revised September 29, 1987, "Grading Plan Proposed Office Building" dated February, 1987 revised September 17, 1987, and "Details Bartlett Property" dated December, 1981 revised September 6, 1982 consisting of two sheets; "Erosion Control and Construction Sequence" narrative dated October 16, 1987 by Krebs & Lansing, Consulting Engineers, Inc.; Illustrations of Land -Works dated October 14, 1987 entitled "Section Through Downspout at Parking Lot" and "Options for Site Development"; and "Bank Planting Plan by Land -Works dated Octo- ber 15, 1987). 12. Prior to the commencement of construction, the Permittee shall install, under the supervision of a registered engineer, a snowfence barrier at least 8 feet from the building perimeter and 3 feet from the parking lot perimeter on the stream side of the building. The Permittee shall file photographs of this snowfence with the Agency of Natural Resources and the District Commission. 13. Prior to the commencement of construction, the Permittee shall file a revised erosion control plan with the Agency of Natural Resources and the District Commission, the revised plan shall incorporate item 3.b. of the November 6, 1987 Stipulation and shall depict the location of the sheet piling. Prior to the commencement of construction, the Agency of Natural Resources shall certify to the District Commission that the revised plans are sufficient. LTH Associates Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0526-5-EB Page 3 14. Prior to any thinning of branches, the Permittee shall notify the Land Use Attorney, Agency of Natural Resources. All removal shall be performed under the supervision of a landscape consultant. 15. The landscape consultant shall ensure that no slash is deposited down slope and that no personnel or machinery encroach beyond the construction limit set by the snowfence and hay bale barriers. 16. Silt fencing shall be installed by hand and hay bales shall not be earth trenched. 17. No scaffolding shall extend beyond the limit of construction. 18. The Permittee shall retain a registered engineer who shall conduct regular erosion control inspections and shall file weekly erosion control reports, as described in the November 6, 1987 Stipulation, with the Agency of Natural Resources and the District Commission. 19. Prior to June 1, 1988, no construction activity may occur within 50 feet of the top of the bank. No construction on the site may extend beyond October 31 of any construction year without prior written approval of the District Commission. 20. The Permittee's engineer shall arrange a joint site visit with a representative of the Agency of Natural Resources and a representative of the District Commission in early September 1988 to review wintertime erosion control protection. The Permittee shall file the wintertime erosion control plan with the Agency of Natural Resources and the District Commission with confirmation from the Agency that the controls are sufficient to prevent wintertime erosion. 21. Any, excess snow shall be removed from the site and no snow shall be dumped anywhere along the stream bank. 22. Any damage to the top or sides of the stream slope will be repaired by the Permittee under the supervision of a registered engineer and with confirmation from the Agency of Natural Resources that the repair is adequate. 23. Prior to the commencement of construction, the Permittee shall file a bond, or other acceptable form of security acceptable to the Agency of Natural Resources and the District Commission, in the amount of $20,000 for a period ending one year after the completion of construction, whichever is greater, for use in repairing any erosion control damage. 24. Prior to the occupancy of the building, the Permittee shall file plans for improvements to the intersection of Harbor View Road and Route 7 with the District Commission and the Agency of Transportation. The District Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review these plans. LTH Associates Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0526-5-EB Page 4 25. The Permittee, and its successors and assigns, shall continually maintain the landscaping substantially as approved in Exhibit #13 and shall replace any dead or diseased trees as soon as seasonally possible. 26. All outdoor lighting shall consist of fully down -shielded luminaires mounted no higher than 12 feet above grade. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 27. The office building shall be constructed with insulation with minimum R-values of R-19 in the exterior walls, R-38 in the ceiling and R-10 around the perimeter of the foundation or slab. 28. All construction on this project must be completed by February 1, 1989. 29. This permit shall expire on December 1, 2002 unless extended by the District Commission. Notwithstanding, this permit shall expire one year from the date of issuance if the Permittee has not demonstrated an intention to proceed with the project. 30. Failure to comply with all of the above criteria may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to the 10 V.S.A., § 6090(c). Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 27th day of January, 1988. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD an^S. Eastman, Acting Chair Ferdinand Bongartz Lawrence H. Bruce, Jr. Elizabeth Courtney Arthur Gibb Samuel Lloyd Roger N. Miller Donald B. Sargent LUP 4C0526-5-EB (APL16) VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 RE: LTH Associates by Richard A. Spokes, Esq. Spokes, Foley & Stitzel P.O. Box 986 Burlington, VT 05402-0986 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Land Use Permit #4C0526-5-EB On August 31, 1987, an appeal was filed with the Environmental Board by LTH Associates through its attorney, Richard A. Spokes, Esq., from the District #4 Environmental Commission's (District Commission) decision dated August 6, 1987. The decision denied the Applicant's proposal to construct a 20,000 square foot office building on Lot #9 of a previously approved commercial subdivision off Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The Appellant objects to the Commission's Findings on Criteria l(E) and 4. Acting Chairman Jan S. Eastman conducted a prehearing conference on October 1, 1987 with the following parties present: LTH Associates (LTH) by Richard A. Spokes, Esq. City of South Burlington by Dick Ward State of Vermont, Agency of Natural Resources (Agency) by Frederic Emigh, Esq. Prior to the public hearing on the merits in this matter, participating parties informed the Board that a settlement had been reached. On November 10, 1987, LTH and the Agency filed a Stipulation with the Board. On January 22, 1988, the City of South Burlington indicated its agreement with and acceptance of the Stipulation. On January 12., 1988, the Board conducted a deliberative session on this matter and adjourned. This matter is now ready for decision. I. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Findings of Fact set forth in the August 6, 1987 decision of the District Commission relating to all criteria except 1(E) and 4 remain in full force and effect. 2. In response to the District Commission's negative findings regarding Criteria l(E) (Streams) and 4 (Erosion), the Applicant has modified its plans by moving the "construction disturbance line" further back from the top of the bank, incorporating a pruning and fertilization plan for trees at the top of the bank, providing for ' LTH Associates - #4C0526-5-EB Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 2 downspouts in the parking lot and eliminating the use of matting on the bank. The Applicant's plans also include the installation of sheet piling and the planting of additional shrub and ground cover adjacent to the north side of the parking lot and building. (Plans and construction drawings by Krebs & Lansing, Consulting Engineers, Inc., entitled "Site Plan Proposed Office Building" dated July, 1986 last revised September 29, 1987, "Grading Plan Proposed Office Building" dated February, 1987 revised September 17, 1987, and "Details Bartlett Property" dated December, 1981 revised Septem- ber 6, 1982 consisting of two sheets; "Erosion Control and Construction Sequence" narrative dated October 16, 1987 by Krebs & Lansing, Consulting Engineers, Inc.; Illustrations of Land -Works dated October 14, 1987 entitled "Section Through Downspout at Parking Lot" and "Options for Site Development"; and "Bank Planting Plan" by Land -Works dated October 15, 1987.) 3. In addition to the erosion control measures outlined in the exhibits referred to in No. 2, the Applicant, at the request of the Agency, will undertake the following: a. A snow fence barrier will be erected before construction - 8 feet from the building perimeter and 3 feet from the parking lot perimeter on the stream side of the project. The snow fence, silt fence and hav bales will be installed under the supervision of the Applicant's engineer, with an appropriate photographic record of installation to be filed with the Land Use Attorney of the Agency of Natural Resources. b. The Applicant will submit to the Agency's Land Use Attorney a more detailed description of the sequence of erosion control measures, including but not limited to a description of the nature of initial clearing (no stumping or grubbing), the location of soil stockpiled from the initial clearing at the street side of the lot, the ultimate disposition of stockpiles, mulching of the stockpiles, and sequence of sheet piling installation, foundation construction, backfilling (at grade) and the removal of sheet piling. C. The trees to be thinned and branches to be removed, will be flagged and reviewed by an Agency representative, if available. Notification of the flagging shall also be given to the Agency's Land Use Attorney. d. The Applicant's landscape consultant will supervise removal of the branches, making sure than no slash is deposited down slope, and that no personnel or machinery encroach beyond the construction limits set by the snow fence and hay bale barriers. i' LTH Associates - #4C0526-5-EB Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 3 e. The hay bales will not be earth trenched, and silt fence trenching will be done by hand and not by machine. f. Scaffolding will not extend beyond the limits of construction. g. Construction progress will be inspected frequently by the Applicant's engineer, who will file weekly reports with the Agency's Land Use Attorney. The reports will outline construction progress, controls in place, note any new or proposed controls and changes to the erosion control plan, note any problems, outline measures taken to repair erosion damage, and note measures taken to restrict encroachment beyond the above -defined physical limits to on -site activity. h. No construction activity may take place within 50 feet of the top of the bank prior to June 1, 1988, and no construction on the site will extend past October 31. i. The Applicant's engineer will arrange a joint site review in early September, 1988, to discuss fall erosion control measures for winter protection. j. If snow stockpiling restricts vehicular access for fire protection, the plowed snow will be removed from the site. In no case will snow be dumped anywhere along the stream. k. Any damage to the top or sides of the stream slope will be repaired by the Applicant, regardless of expense. The Applicant will file a bond or other form of security acceptable to the Agency's Land Use Attorney in the amount of $20,000 for a period ending two years after the commencement of construction, or one year after completion of construction, whichever is greater, for use in repairing any erosion control damage. 4. The development adjacent to the banks of the stream will, whenever feasible, maintain the natural condition of the stream, and will not endanger the health, safety or welfare of the public or any adjoining landowners. �j 5. The development will not cause unreasonable soil erosion or reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water so that a dangerous or unhealthy condition may result. LTH Associates - #4C0526-5-EB Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 4 II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Board concludes that the Stipulation submitted by the parties participating in this appeal does not generally contravene the values which Act 250 is designed to protect. However, certain issues were not addressed in the Stipulation. Consequently, the Board will require additional protection as outlined below: The plans do not depict the location of the sheet piling and do not provide for erosion controls during the installation of the sheet piling; therefore, the Board will require that revised plans which incorporate this information be submitted. The Stipulation requires the filing of additional erosion control information with the Agency. The Board concludes that it is also necessary to have this information filed with the District Commission and that the Agency must determine that the filed information complies with the stipulation and that the additional erosion controls are sufficient. Because there are reasonable circumstances which postpone the construction of projects, the Board concludes that it is necessary to have the term of the bond expire one year after the completion of construction. The Board will incorporate the Stipulation and these conclusions into a permit condition. Based upon the Stipulation, the foregoing Findings of Fact and additional requirements outlined above, it is the jj conclusion of the Board that the proposed development described in Land Use Permit Application #4C0526-5 (as amended on appeal), if completed and maintained in accordance with all the terms and conditions of that application, the exhibits I� referred to herein and those exhibits presented to District Commission, and the conditions hereinabove set forth, will cause or result in a detriment to the public health, safety general welfare under the criteria set forth in 10 V.S.A. § 6086 (a) . of not or LTH Associates - #4C0526-5-EB Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 5 III. ORDER Land Use Permit #4C0526-5-EB is hereby issued in accordance with the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law herein. Jurisdiction over this matter is returned to the District #4 Environmental Commission. Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 27th day of January, ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD /'an S. Eastman, Chair (/Ferdinand Bongartz Lawrence H. Bruce, Jr. Elizabeth Courtney Arthur Gibb Samuel Lloyd Roger N. Miller Donald B. Sargent FF 4C0526-5-EB (APL16) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Stephanie J. Kaplan, Executive Officer, 1 Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing Land Use Permit #4C0526-5-EB and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, to the following: LTH Associates by Richard A. Spokes, Esq. jl Spokes, Foley & Stitzel P.O. Box 986 Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington Councilmen by Paul Farrar, Chairman 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington Planning Commission Peter Jacob, Chairman 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Jane Lafleur, Planner 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Arthur R. Hogan, Jr., Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning and Development Commission Box 108 Essex Jct., VT 05452 Frederic Emigh, Esq. Representative, State Agencies Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street Center Building - 2d Floor Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR INFORMATION ONLY: Dick Ward, Zoning Administrator City of S. Burlington 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Susan Dimick N. Williston Rd. Williston, VT 05495 Fredrick Sickels, Coordinator District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West St. Essex Jct., VT 05452 Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 28th day of January,/1988. v By CI (40A^ Stephanie JY Ka an Executive Officer STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05602 802-828-3309 July 20, 1988 Greg Rabideau Larkin Realty 1185 Shelburne Road S. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: L.T.H. Associates Land Use Permit #4C0526-5-EB Dear Mr. Rabideau: The Board considered your letter dated July 13, 1988 regarding your questions about conditions 19, 28, and 29 of Land Use Permit #4C0526-5-EB, and has the following responses: 1. The purpose of requiring no construction "on the site" beyond October 31 is to ensure that soil erosion does not occur. This requirement applies to any earth work on the site but not to construction that does not involve moving soil. 2. You should apply to the District #4 Environmental Commission for an amendment to extend the construction completion date and expiration date established in the permit. That can probably be accomplished through the minor application procedures established in the Board Rule 51. Contact Lou Borie, Coordinator for Distriction #4, for information regarding your application. The Board appreciates your attempt to resolve these issues in a timely manner. If you have any further questions, please contact me. Sincerely, She p Gc�,u.c,� �-• kQp taut Stephanie J. Kaplan Executive Officer SJK/vjb cc: Parties Rabideau 7/19/88 (LTR10) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Stephanie J. Kaplan, Executive Officer, Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing Letter to Greg Rabideau by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on this 20th day of July, 1988 to the following: LTH Associates by Richard A. Spokes, Esq. Spokes, Foley & Stitzel P.O. Box 986 Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington Councilmen by Paul Farrar, Chairman 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington Planning Commission Peter Jacob, Chairman 575 Dorset St. ,S. Burlington, VT 05401 Jane Lafleur, Planner 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Arthur R. Hogan, Jr., Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning and Development Commission Box 108 tlEssex Jct., VT 05452 Mark Sinclair, Esq. Representative, State Agencies Agency of Natural Resources :103 South Main Street Center Building - 2d Floor Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR INFORMATION ONLY: Dick Ward, Zoning Administrator ,;City of S. Burlington 575 Dorset St. !,S. Burlington, VT 05401 .Susan Dimick N. Williston Rd. Williston, VT 05495 ,;Louis Borie, Coordinator ',District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West St. ,'Essex Jct., VT 05452 I ,Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 20th day of July, 1988. By Stephanie J. p an Executive Of icer STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05602 802-828-3309 July 20, 1988 Greg Rabideau Larkin Realty � 11$5 Shelburne Road S. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: L.T.H. Associates Land Use Permit #4C0526-5-EB Dear Mr. Rabideau: The Board considered your letter dated July 13, 1988 regarding your questions about conditions 19, 28, and 29 of Land Use Permit #4C0526-5-EB, and has the following responses: 1. The purpose of requiring no construction "on the site" beyond October 31 is to ensure that soil erosion does not occur. This requirement applies to any earth work on the site but not to construction that does not involve moving soil. 2. You should apply to the District #4 Environmental Commission for an amendment to extend the construction completion date and expiration date established in the permit. That can probably be accomplished through the minor application procedures established in the Board Rule 51. Contact Lou Borie, Coordinator for Distriction #4, for information regarding your application. The Board appreciates your attempt to resolve these issues in a timely manner. If you have any further questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Stephanie J. Kaplan Executive Officer SJK/vjb cc: Parties Rabideau 7/19/88 (LTR10) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Stephanie J. Kaplan, Executive Officer, Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing Letter to Greg Rabideau by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on this 20th day of July, 1988 to the following: LTH Associates by Richard A. Spokes, Esq. Spokes, Foley & Stitzel P.O. Box 986 Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington Councilmen by Paul Farrar, Chairman 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington Planning Commission Peter Jacob, Chairman 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Jane Lafleur, Planner 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Arthur R. Hogan, Jr., Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning and Development Commission BOX 108 Essex Jct., VT 05452 Mark Sinclair, Esq. Representative, State Agencies Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street Center Building - 2d Floor Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR INFORMATION ONLY: Dick Ward, Zoning Administrator City of S. Burlington 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05401 Susan Dimick N. Williston Rd. Williston, VT 05495 Louis Borie, Coordinator District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West St. Essex Jct., VT 05452 Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 20th day of July, 1988. By '.�, Stephanie J. plan Executive Of icer State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT AMENDMENT CASE NO: 4C0526-5A LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT: LTH Associates 10 V.S.A.,Chapter 151 ADDRESS: 410 Shelburne Road (Act 250) South Burlington, VT 05403 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0526-5A pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 118, Page 275 of the land records of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to LTH Associates, the "permittee" as "grantee". This permit specifically authorizes the permittee to extend the construction completion date from February 1, 1989 to February 1, 1990 for the previously approved 20,000 square foot office building on Lot #9 of the Bartlett commercial subdivision. The permittee, its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved the the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0526-5 remain in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. All construction on this project must be completed by February 1, 1990. 3. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Section 6090 (b). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 27th day of October 1988. BY-Z M, nn Whalen Acting Chairperson District #4 Commission BY ?L.( Louis Borie Environmental Board District #4 Coordinator Members participating in this decision: Helen Lawrence CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Louis Borie, District for the #4 District of the Environmental Board, of the foregoing AMENDMENT regarding #4C0526-5A Mail, postage paid, to the following: LTH Associates John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 R.G. Blanchard 23 College Parkway Winooski, Vt. 05404 Margaret Picard, Town Clerk 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Chairman, Board of Selectman c/o Town Clerk's Office 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Chairman, Town Planning Commission c/o Town Clerk's Office 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Town Planner c/o Town Clerk's Office 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Mark Sinclair, Esq. Representative, State Agencies Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - 2 Center Waterbury, VT 05676 Coordinator sent a copy by U.S. Page 2 Certificate of Service #4CO526-5A - Amendment Executive Officer Environmental Board State Office Building P.O. Montpelier, VT 05602 HEALTH DEPARTMENT 60 Main Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 District Commissioners: Helen Lawrence Lynn Whalen 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Regional Engineer Ernie Christiansen 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Krebs & Lansing 199 Main St. Winooski, Vt. 05404 Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 r BY Louis Borie District #4 Coordinator Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 27th day of October, 1988. State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT AMENDMENT CASE NO: 4C0526-5A.__._.__ LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT: LTH Associates--., 10 V.S.A.,Chapter 151 ADDRESS: 410_9_helburne _Roach (Act 250) South Burlington, VT 05403 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0526-5A pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 118, Page 275 of the land records of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to LTH Associates, the "permittee" as "grantee". This permit specifically authorizes the permittee to extend the construction completion date from February 1, 1989 to February 1, 1990 for the previously approved 20,000 square foot office building on Lot #9 of the Bartlett commercial subdivision. The permittee, its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved the the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0526-5 remain in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. All construction on this project must be completed by February 1, 1990. 3. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Section 6090 (b). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 27th day of October 1988. j: BY M.'Lynn Whalen Acting Chairperson District #4 Commission C BY Louis Borie Environmental Board District #4 Coordinator Members participating in this decision: Helen Lawrence CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Louis Borie, District for the #4 District of the Environmental Board, of the foregoing AMENDMENT regarding #4C0526-5A Mail, postage paid, to the following: LTH Associates John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 R.G. Blanchard 23 College Parkway Winooski, Vt. 05404 Margaret Picard, Town Clerk 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Chairman, Board of Selectman c/o Town Clerk's Office 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Chairman, Town Planning Commission c/o Town Clerk's Office 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Town Planner c/o Town Clerk's Office 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Mark Sinclair, Esq. Representative, State Agencies Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - 2 Center Waterbury, VT 05676 Coordinator sent a copy by U.S. Page 2 Certificate of Service #4CO526-5A - Amendment Executive Officer Environmental Board State Office Building P.O. Montpelier, VT 05602 HEALTH DEPARTMENT 60 Main Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 District Commissioners: Helen Lawrence Lynn Whalen 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Regional Engineer Ernie Christiansen 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Krebs & Lansing 199 Main St. Winooski, Vt. 05404 Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 BY � cl/�?'L�- Louis Borie District #4 Coordinator Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 27th day of October, 1988. 9,�XPOA V k/, ep, STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RE: John Larkin, Inc. REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT 410 Shelburne Road LAND USE PERMIT 94CO526-5 South Burlington, VT 05403 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) BACKGROUND: Land Use Permit #4C0526-5-EB was issued on January 27, 1988 to LTH Associates. The permit authorized the construction of a 20,000 sf. office building on Lot #9 of the Bartlett Subdivision on Harbor View Drive in the City of South Burlington. FINDINGS OF FACT: On August 6, 2003, the current owners of the tract, John Larkin, Inc., submitted a petition to the District Commission to declare the permit abandoned by non-use. The owners have not commenced construction on the project within three years as required by Board Rule 38(B). The owners do not intend to pursue the project authorized by the permit. Pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 38 (B) all parties were notified of the request to have the permit abandoned. Twenty days were allowed for comments or requests for a hearing. No comments were received within the allocated time period. Permit #4C0526-5 is hereby abandoned. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 1 day ofAvw* 2003. _ By: Z�� a—_ )� Tom Little, Chair District # 4 Environmental Commission CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this f day of September, 2003, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT LUP #4C0526-5-EB, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES: John Larkin, Inc. Larkin Realty 410 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05401 Bill Nedde, III Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Thomas Little, Chair 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of September, 2003. CAA w:cs4C0526-5/cc Christine Cbrnmo, Administrative Secretary 879-5660 James Pease, 10:28 AM 9/22/00 , Larkin project -Harbor View Rd X-Persona: <eudoramail.com> From: "James Pease" <JIMP@dec.anr.state.vt.us> To: RJBelair@juno.com Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 10:28:54 -0500 Subject: Larkin project -Harbor View Rd CC: maccallum@eudoramail.com Priority: normal Ray: We have reviewed the proposed commercial development on lot #9 on Harbor View Rd and have decided that the project simply does not come close to meeting the Act 250 guideline of a 50' set back from the top of bank. Additional issues are the destabilized stream channel which will not be restored by simply adding riprap to the slope toe and the presence of the rare sculpin downstream which could be affected by the habitat loss and stormwater input (which will only have the muncipal Bartlett Brook permit but not a state stormwater permit). There are places where the building or the access drive are less than 5 feet. The main issue here is the lack of setback which will lead to an unstable slope and ineffective buffer for the stream. Kim Greenwood has contacted Krebs & Lansing. We are not opposed to another structure that better fits the site. One idea we have proposed to them is the idea of merging the two properties and using part of parcel 9 for the open space requirement that could serve a larger development on lot 10. It would appear that a parking lot could be built on the property adjacent to the road (we assume the 40 setback from the street is not required since it is not a structure). It sounds like they are going to look at other possible uses and/or building size. Jim James Pease Water Quality Division 10 North Building 103 S. Main St. Waterbury, VT USA 05671-0408 (802) 241-2683 JimP@dec.anr.state.vt.us Printed for "Sarah H. MacCaiium" Eamacca11Rzoo.uvm.edu3 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 25, 2000 Greg Rabideau 286 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Lot Nine Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Rabideau: Enclosed please find a copy of the August 15, 2000 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, arah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 15 AUGUST 2000 a. The site plan shall be revised to show the proposed temporary equipment trailer (C.O.W.) relocated to meet the rear yard setback requirement. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the equipment trailer. 5. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. Mr. Schmitt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 13. Item for discussion submitted by John Larkin for a 45 unit congregate housing facility, 9 Harbor View Road: Mr. Rabideau said their previous permit has expired, and this would be a new site plan. There are three key issues: building heights, additional parking in the front yard setback, and two curb cuts. This is part of a parcel of land that includes the Howard Johnson's complex on Shelburne Rd. It is a long narrow lot with many constraints, including a tributary of Bartlett Brook on the boundary. They propose to put a 45-unit elderly housing facility on the property with some underground parking. They need two curb cuts as the whole circulation of the project depends on this. They would also ask for additional parking in the front yard setback up to the limit. The project would be a low traffic generator. They can't get into the underground parking without two accesses. Mr. Rabideau said there would be more than adequate separation between the two accesses. There would be 7 guest parking spaces. No more than 4 employees are anticipated. Mr. Cameron asked how many stories the building would be. Mr. Rabideau said at least 3, but they would like a waiver for 4. They would have a problem providing the additional setback for the other story. Mr. Belair noted the Board cannot allow a front setback waiver because this is not a PUD. Mr. Rabideau said it could be folded into a 11 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 15 AUGUST 2000 PUD, but the question is whether they would want such a big building closer to the road. Mr. Schmitt asked how far the first curb cut would he from Shelburne Rd. Mr. Rabideau estimated 300-400 ft. Mr. Cameron said he had mixed feelings on the 2 curb cuts but would consider it. Mr. Belair said there wouldn't be a lot of conflict there, and the Allen Rd. connection might help. Mr. Belair said it would be a very complex process to put this into a PUD. Mr. Rabideau said they would like to keep it simple. There is also a question of storm water. They will have to meet state and city requirements. Mr. Belair said the existing systems should be working properly. Members were OK with a three story building with a basement. Mr. Rabideau stressed they wouldn't cut anything in the CO Zone. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:05 p.m. Clerk 12 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 11, 2000 Greg Rabideau Rabideau Architects, Inc. 286 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Congregate Housing, 9 Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Rabideau: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 15, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincergly, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls Memorandum - City Engineer August 15, 2000 agenda items August 11, 2000 LOT NO. 9 - BARTLETT SUBDIVISION - HARBOR VIEW ROAD 1. Storm drainage system impact shall be reviewed by Heindel - Noyes because the project is within the Bartlett Brook watershed area. 2. The sidewalk near the westerly entrance is against the curb. 3. The existing guard rail is not shown. C.P.I. COMMERCIAL PIPING, INC. - LIME ROCK ROAD Site plan showing storage facilities prepared by Wright & Morrissey, Inc. contractor dated 7/13/89 is acceptable. KELLEY PROPERTY - 73 ETHAN ALLEN PARKWAY Curb openings at Ethan Allen Drive and Commerce Avenue shall include a depressed concrete curb with a 1 1/2 inch reveal. CONTACT SERVICES - WILLISTON ROAD 1. The sewer service to the existing building is located about ten feet easterly from the manhole shown. 2. The sewer main is located under the sidewalk. 3. Sewer plans and highway plans exist in this area. They should be checked for water and sewer services and main locations and street r.o.w. 2 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: August 15, 2000 agenda items Date: August 1, 2000 Goldberg - 1760 Dorset Street The applicant should consult with the Fire Department on the proposed hydrant locations. 2026 Williston Road - Site Plan The new buildings should be sprinklered and include a fire alarm. 73 Ethan Allen Drive - Site Plan and Conditional Use The building should be sprinklered and include a fire alarm. 16 Lime Rock Road - Site Plan and Conditional Use Acceptable Lot 9 Harbor Road - Discussion The proposed building should be sprinklered and include a fire alarm. Memorandum - Development Review August 15, 2000 agenda items 11) RCC ATLANTIC, INC. - EQUIPMENT TRAILER AND ANTENNAS - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved plan for a 2605 square foot office building and 64 foot tower. The amendment consists of: 1) the placement of a temporary equipment trailer, and 2) adding three (3) 5 -foot panel antennas at the 35-foot centerline elevation on the existing tower. The only issues affected by this project are coverages and setbacks. This property located at 2026 Williston Road lies within the IC District. It is bounded on the west by a daycare facility, on the north by undeveloped property, on the east by a motel, and on the south by Williston Road. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 7.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 81.7% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 67% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall and front yard coverages are existing and will not be made worse by this application. The existing building and an equipment shed do not meet setback requirements. The proposed temporary equipment railer will not meet the rear setback requirement. The plan should be revised to show the trailer meeting the setback requirements. 12) JOHN LARKIN - DISCUSSION - 45 UNIT CONGREGATE HOUSING FACILITY, 9 HARBOR VIEW ROAD The applicant has requested to present the concept of a 45 unit congregate housing facility to be located at 9 Harbor View Road for discussion purposes with the Development Review Board. This lot was previously approved by the Planning Commission on May 24, 1983. Access/Circulation: Two points of access are proposed along Harbor View Road. The western curb cut will be 24 feet in width leading to a 17 foot wide access drive providing access to the underground parking only. The eastern curb cut will be 32 feet wide leading to a 19 foot wide access drive. Section 26.103 of the Zoning Regulations prohibits more than one driveway access per lot unless one is designated for entering and the other for exiting. Section 26.254 of the Zoning Regulations requires that access drives be a minimum of 20 feet in width or 10 feet if designated one way. Since the access drives are not connected, it would not be 0 Memorandum - Development Review August 15, 2000 agenda items possible to designate the curb cuts as one way. The applicant should be prepared to justify the two (2) curb cuts. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/Setback: The applicant should submit information on the proposed coverages. All setback requirements appear to be met. Parking: A total of 31 parking spaces are being provided. The applicant should submit information on how many staff and employees are to be employed by the facility in order to calculate parking requirements. The applicant should also revise plans to include handicapped parking and a bike rack. Traffic: The proposed use will generate 7.65 additional P.M. peak hour vehicle trip ends. The applicant should pay the appropriate road impact fees prior to permit issuance. Lighting.- All lights must be downcasting and shielded. The applicant should submit cut sheets for all proposed lights for approval by the Director of Planning & Zoning. Landscaping: The applicant should submit information on the construction costs as well as a landscaping schedules for all proposed plantings. Dumpsters: If dumpsters are proposed, the applicant should revise the plans to include a screened dumpster area. Sewer: The applicant should submit a sewer allocation request. Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District: In accordance with Section 23.101 of the Zoning Regulations, the applicant should submit applicable information regarding the development and storm water management to the City for inclusion into the City's stormwater and hydrology computer model. Conservation/Open Space: The applicant has defined the bounds of the Conservation/Open Space District on the plans. The applicant should submit finished grade contours to ensure that filling within the C.O. District does not take place. Conditional Use Criteria: The applicant should submit information as to how the proposed use meets the conditional use criteria for the Commercial Two District. 9 Memorandum - Development Review August 15, 2000 agenda items possible to designate the curb cuts as one way. The applicant should be prepared to justify the two (2) curb cuts. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/Setback: The applicant should submit information on the proposed coverages. All setback requirements appear to be met. Parking: A total of 31 parking spaces are being provided. The applicant should submit information on how many staff and employees are to be employed by the facility in order to calculate parking requirements. The applicant should also revise plans to include handicapped parking and a bike rack. Traffic: The proposed use will generate 7.65 additional P.M. peak hour vehicle trip ends. The applicant should pay the appropriate road impact fees prior to permit issuance. Lighting All lights must be downcasting and shielded. The applicant should submit cut sheets for all proposed lights for approval by the Director of Planning & Zoning. Landscaping: The applicant should submit information on the construction costs as well as a landscaping schedules for all proposed plantings. Dumpsters: If dumpsters are proposed, the applicant should revise the plans to include a screened dumpster area. Sewer: The applicant should submit a sewer allocation request. Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District: In accordance with Section 23.101 of the Zoning Regulations, the applicant should submit applicable information regarding the development and storm water management to the City for inclusion into the City's stormwater and hydrology computer model. Conservation/Open Space: The applicant has defined the bounds of the Conservation/Open Space District on the plans. The applicant should submit finished grade contours to ensure that filling within the C.O. District does not take place. Conditional Use Criteria: The applicant should submit information as to how the proposed use meets the conditional use criteria for the Commercial Two District. 10 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 2, 2000 Greg Rabideau Rabideau Architects, Inc. 86 Lake Street Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Lot 9, Harbor View Road Dear Mr. Rabideau: Please find enclosed preliminary comments on the above referenced application. The project is currently scheduled to be considered by the Development Review Board on August 15, 2000. If you wish to respond to these comments or submit additional information, please do so no later than August 8, 2000. Please be sure that someone is at this meeting to represent your application. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure _ �i�govnrdmafe existing broo8 C Ear _ Sq,/l � B• a e` _"M $ 8 \ se 9 an Mv, f985 Lot ,3 i 11 � Legend_ -- — — Approx. Property Llne --W —W — Existing Wolff Line Notes Exlettng Sewer Llne _ _ Tgoogrcgo/t/c survey comp/sled by Krebs and Lansing — c— —c Exist/ g Gas Lhe on Lot 9 In ✓anuary 1987.. Site information on Lots 4, and 6 is from design/permitting drawings. — w — w — Proposed Water Line Proposed Sewer Line —E— — — —t — Existing Electric Edge of Wands _ixx sl, yY C—bw Point i- _ Contour Contour .. 250.0 Finish Grade Soot Elevatian -----==.-aNew fmtmg drain service Lot 11 \ Howard Johnson &! ■. d �i �► Lot 10 South N/F John Larkin Va/ume 126 Page 292 January 6, 1976 e NW F] Trona/ame• E— M- f9e 2' hK - 207..29 a to Spear Street Horbo View acid I I ` SM LxbrMg e' AG h +h - 2r4J2aL7 MN M _ 0a S �eN Lka9 ,RMary ssss W I fly ti hK Wf _ 2t'ti e� _ 204 1%6LiM) v ac CB [aa7d co�ar) hv. 1h, _ 197 �e hv. _ Tb✓/. I 1 4 Rhr Gg a M1 7 (1 ) pK h lac K - 2r r�i hK X79.e � \ e•p mar �JQ .— —µ• fhD corm Sean 0"h1M9 e'— ss a[ fear —•_ .— —,fir — �--�rww R — _ c 215 G -. Lam/ _ —` ME 10 tM — — — — ��E — — �%�Lyv — IJO'PiC Z j ti Wf A' N b ^, t7ewH _Tlef2a�l G�N� 5 2f6 Ti a/ Lot 4 gs\� �� 1 � /21T Lot 5 NSF/ i I - - She/Mime e /nv. = 20 216 P/sties e ��° EnearcMoe I�e` Lot 6 New catch east? /1 .Pr.C� 5 / N/X' A//en nod JUN 3 p 204 City of So. Burlington acts nrsad �'6� asd'w osre Design NW SKETCH PLAN Drawn Iry 0' 20' 40' Bo' 120' Checked --- Scale 1' _ 20' - Lot 9 Date Feb. 2-5-2000 Bort/et t Bar Scale = 20' Project 00102 1 Harbor New Rood ff �$a Burtln tan, t'em -RAWIPMAL3 A r^L� CT1.IT'ECfS .I MC. - I 2$<o_.COLLECTS %.. WF?-utNCTTON, Y[', ~~•1 To: Applicants From: Sarah MacCallum, City of South Burlington RE: Project Staff Notes Date: August 1, 2000 JOHN LARKIN — DISCUSSION — 45 UNIT ELDERLY HOUSING FACILITY, LOT 9 HARBOR VIEW ROAD Previous Action: This lot was previously approved by the Planning Commission on May 24, 1983. Overview: The applicant has requested to present the concept of a 45 unit elderly housing facility to be located on lot nine along Harbor View Road for discussion purposes with the Development Review Board. Issues: ■ Section 26.103 of the Zoning Regulations prohibits more than one driveway access per lot unless one is designated for entering and the other for exiting. ■ Section 26.254 of the Zoning Regulations requires that access drives be a minimum of 20 feet in width or 10 feet if designated one way. Since the access drives are not connected, it would not be possible to designate the curb cuts as one way. The applicant should revise the plans to address this problem. ■ The applicant should submit information on the proposed coverages. ■ The applicant should submit information on how many staff and employees are to be employed by the facility in order to calculate parking requirements. ■ The applicant should also revise plans to include handicapped parking and a bike rack. ■ The applicant should submit cut sheets for all proposed lights for approval by the Director of Planning & Zoning. ■ The applicant should submit information on the construction costs as well as a landscaping schedule for all proposed plantings. ■ If dumpsters are proposed, the applicant should revise the plans to include a screened dumpster area. ■ The applicant should submit a sewer allocation request. ■ In accordance with Section 23.101. of the Zoning Regulations, the applicant should submit applicable information regarding the development and storm water management to the City for inclusion into the City's stormwater and hydrology computer model. ■ The applicant should submit finished grade contours to ensure that filling within the C.O. District does not take place. The applicant should submit information as to how the proposed use meets the conditional use criteria for the Commercial Two District. Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted sufficient information for Development Review Board to discuss the plans at their August 15, 2000 meeting. June 30, 2000 v Q-- Mr. Ray Belair South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Lot Number Nine, Bartlett's Subdivision, Harbor View Road, South Burlington, Vermont, John Larkin, Applicant. Dear Ray, Please find enclosed 5 copies plus an 1 Ix17 Reduction of a plan for a new project. Mr. Larkin proposes the construction of a three story plus underground garage / basement to house 45 units of elderly housing. This plan should be reviewed under the rules for a Site Plan Application. I would like an opportunity to make a sketch plan presentation to the board prior to completing all the engineering work for this proposal, in order to have the benefit of their input prior to committing resources. Would you please schedule us for that review? I greatly appreciate your consideration, and look forward to your response. 9� r tI/'%, Y .` I L . ,� c �_ ,, - ` , ,- , . �:� _.. __ ___ .. _ - �., ... .. .W �, ^ etc ` l �'; �` � v ,;� ,, ��° � �. g - �,. � � ,.� �,, fi "' J A S ,_ r ��� ,�._ ,,,.�.—.�.�.�..�...n_._— , t i �' �":: / 2 � f� � ,. � ' �- (� v ��` :� f `" feu, � J CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record -5pk�, = WA Applicant W) �o O Contact 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. 7A,:j 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (81 x 11, 8} x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development. (Signature) applicant or contact person Date g'V May 27, 1983 John Larkin 1185 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear John, Enclosed is a copy of the South Burlington Planning Comission' s final approval with stipulations for your 6 lot comercial subdivision on Harbor View Road. Please note that several item will be kept open during site plan review of individuJA lots. You should specifically note that a detailed traffic report will be required in the near future. Please consider this in your plans for further subdivision and sale of commercial lots. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner DHS/mcq 2. "Proposed Site Grading, Easy Self S orage 46 Swift Street," prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates last revise Kav lb. 1983. subject .to the fol_owinR stipulations: i....,The-landscaping plan shall be revised so that all indicated site improvements coincide with those shown on the site _an. The plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City P anner Prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall submit easements and other legal documents: as needed to indicate that the proposed off -site storm drainage can be installed as shown on the site plan. 3. A landscaping bond of $6000 shall be submitted prior to is- suance of a bu2ding permit. 4. This approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Belter seconded the motion which was passed unanimously. Request for additional sketch plan review of a 2-lot subdivision or Helen Tilley on Old Farm Road and Hinesburg Road Mr. Tilley advised the Commission that neither Digital nor the OtBriens was willing at this time to give a blanket right of way to Kimball Avenue. He stressed that the alternate right of way requested by the City Planner running along the easement to Green Mountain Power and the Water District would split the family's dwelling place and put them on an island between two roads. Mr. Poger noted that a right of way does not affect the land. The most desirable access is next to the Interstate, but it is good to be far-sighted and plan for an alternative. If an arrangement can be made with the O'Briens, then Old Farm Road may never have to be activated. It is in the city's best in- terest, however, to reserve two right of ways. Mr. Spitz ad- vised that Mr. Szymanski had gone to the Highway Board which has put the proposed interchange on the 5-year plan to be studied.. Mr. Tilley stressed that they were reluctant to show the second right of way but would do so if it were the only means of getting the Commission's approval. Mr. Tilley then asked for a waiver of the survey because there is ample physical evidence of a physical boundary which is a stone wall. Mr. Spitz indicated he did not recommend this. Mr. Tilley explained that if the survey is delayed, the future buyer would bear the cost. In a poll of members, Mrs. Maher indicated she was willing to waive the survey. The remaining members were not. Warned Public Hearing: Final plat application by LTH Associates, . or resubdivision of the Bartlett property. consis ina of six new commercial lots on Harbor View Road Mr. Spitz explained that the requested changes involved lots 5, 6, and 7, and that the request is for 175 foot frontages on lots 5 and 6 and a larger lot 7. Bill Rowell advised that lots 5 and 6 are under deposit contingent upon the change. The developer wants to keep lot 7 for himself and will keep the conservation zone within his boundary. Mr. Spitz said he felt that subdivision should be for the use of the land, and Mr. Poger said it didn't make sense to leave a triangle of land as was planned. Mr. Rowell explained that they were not giving up much usable land except in the back. An added advantage, he felt, was that if anyone wanted to exert undue pressure to put something on the conservation zone, the Com- mission would be dealing with only one owner. He added that the ravine is a natural buffer for the area, and if it is under one owner, it would be easier to administer. Both Mr. Poger and Mr. Mona noted that they would have to be wary of future development on lot 7. Mrs.;'Maher then moved that the South Burlington Planning Com- mission grant approval for the final plat application bv LTH Associates for six commercial lots (numbers 4 throuon Harbor View Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Commercial Lots Bartlett Property," prepared FV7_R_r_e7s_ n onsu ansiltin Engineers, last revised May 1 3, su ec o e following stipulations: fir. The following items shall remain open for review and potential stipulations during site plan review of each of the b commercia lots: a Storm drainage b Determination of sewer allocations c Cumulative tra fic im acts. The a shall perform a traffic studV prior generator on any of the 6 lots or ivisron o commercial lots on the d) Snow fencing adjacent to conservati and 9 during time of construction. licant to any for to (LTH Associates) major traffic — Bartlett pr on zones on t sun- s 6 7, 2. One curb cut shall be shared by lots 7 & 8 and one curb cut shall e shared ots 5 & b. Lots & 9 shall ave curb cuts opposite each other. 3. The record copy of the final plat shall be recorded within 0 days. The motion was seconded by Mr. Belter and received unanimous approval. Site plan application by Irwin Wallman for a manufacturing Tu-ilding on lot 4 of the commercial portion of the Bartlett property on Harbor View Road Mr. Spitz noted that the applicant has received a conditional approval from the Zoning Board. Mr. Krebs then described the proposed building. It would be 60' by 1801, set back 60 feet from the right of way. Tractor trailers would have easy access from Harbor View Road. He noted that the land elevations differ, the high spot being 217' with the northwest corner being only 2001. There will be a drainage cut of approximately 4 feet with a drainage swale to run due north. He noted that Mr. Szymanski had requested some kind of a drop inlet. He then pointed out M CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant LTH Associates 2) Name of Subdivision Bartlett Property - Commercial' 3) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application: None 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: Proposal is for six(6) new commercial lots fronting on Harbor View Road 5) Submit four copies of a final set of plans consisting of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. (Signature) applicant or contact person Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLING`ON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record 42 ZZ .���� Z b. Applicant c. Contact person Af ef,� 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). S' ,mow' ice- 1��3 1`5 �• - 0?= 3-4��1' 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) fLAII! G 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties 5gt— l li �, 4731 1/VG - 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub- division, and include the dates of such actions: �_Q (fib/ram 8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. Signature) applicant or contact person da to PUBLIC BEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public .hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, May 24 1983, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final Plat Application by LTH Associates for six new commercial to Harbor View Road in the Bartlett Property development. Property is bounded on the west by Shelburne Road, on the north by Benes Corporation, on the north and east by other lands of the applicant, and on the south by Allenwood Home, Concord Investment Group, and First Burlington Realty Corporation. 2) Final Plat Application by Homestead Design, Inc., for a 6-lot subdivision on Bartletts Bay Road. Property is bounded on the northeast by the South Burlington sewage treatment plant, on the south by Bartletts Bay Road, and on the west by Butterfield, Shearer, Campbell, Flanders, Bruhn, Irish, and Mackay. Copies of the applications South Burlington City Hall. May 7, 1983 are available for public inaction at the Sidney B. Poger Chairman, South Burlington Planninq Conunission DHS 5/23/83 MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission grant approval for the final plat application by LTH Associates for six commercial lots (numbers 4 through 10) on Harbor View Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Commercial Lots, Bartlett Property", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, last revised May 11, 1983: Stipulations: t frontage hall be in ea ed by 25 et r each of s`5 and 6 d e�decr sed 50 fe t for of 7. The ang e of s e property 1' e�' e to shall 'Rot change 2) The following items shall remain open for review and potential stipulations during site plan review of each of the 6 commercial lots: a) Storm drainage. b) Determination of sewer allocations. c) Cumulative traffic impacts. The applicant (LTH Associates) shall perform a traffic study prior to any major traffic generator on any of the 6 lots or prior to the next subdivison of commercial lots on the Bartlett property. d) Snow fencing^ adjacent to conservation zones on lots 6,7 and 9. dur" co��firuGtin� 3) The record copy of the final plat, atip—ulatlon-l-,-shall be -submitted -to- e i y anner--and_ shall be recorded within 90 days. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 5/20/83 2) Miniwarehouses Total coverage has been reduced from 70% to 60%. After reviewing the new plans, the only necessary change was a minor building adjustment to improve pedestrian access. Also, the landscaping plan must be revised to conform with the new layout. I see no other problems. 3) Tilley Russell Tilley wishes to reappear to clarify Planning Commission opinions on access and survey requirements. Despite any problems it may cause for this applicant I strongly recommend that two separate access routes to Hinesburg Road, as previously discussed, be required. Even though the current application is a minor one, there could be major development later on - and sufficient access options must be retained until the issue can be more thoroughly studied. 4) Homestead Design Applicants have been unable to purchase additional land from abutters to total 6 acres. Therefore the final application contains only 5 rather than 6 lots. Also, the joint access arrangement with Bartletts Bay homeowners has not worked out. Both private driveway and r-o-w for future access will be located adjacent to the City sewer property. Complete survey information has not yet been submitted. Also legal and water reviews are still pending. Recreation fee is $390, or $78 per unit. Due to the length of the City Manager/Engineer's comments, final plat approval at Tuesday's meeting is unlikely. 5) Bartlett Subdivision - 6 Lots Lot layout has regressed slighly since sketch plan. Apparently, a prospective buyer wants less than the originally proposed acreage on lots 5 and 6. Therefore the applicant has added some of that land to lot 7. Un- fortunately, the land in question is on the opposite side of a conservation zone from the balance of lot 7 and is effectively unusable. Even though the arrangement causes no real problems for the City, it would make much more sense to add the land in question back to lot 6. The joint curb cut arrangement will still work with either proposed lay- out. Memorandum Next week's agenda items 5/20/83 Page 2 Several items should be reserved for consideration during individual site plan reviews - including drainage, sewer allocations, and cumulative traffic impacts. At some point it is very likely that the developer (LTH Associates) will have to install a traffic light at the intersection with Shelburne Road. A traffic analysis will be necessary prior to any major traffic generator on these 6 lots or prior to the next subdivision of commercial lots. Because of recent problems in the City with protection of conservation zones, it will be necessary to install protective measures - such as snow fences - at relevant locations. This will probably affect lots 7, 9 and perhaps 6. 6) Wallman - Manufacturing Building Application is for a 10,800 square foot building for the manufacture of plastic bottles. It has been approved by the Zoning Board as a condition- al use. This use is currently operating in Muddy Brook Industrial Park and will be relocated from there. The proposed lot is one of the 6 lots from the Bartlett subdivision (see above). If that subdivision is not finalized, this site plan must be delayed. The lot is just to the east (uphill) of the proposed Westinghouse builing. The use requires a large circulation area in front of the building for truck loading. Also, there will be a 34-foot high storage silo on the far side of the building. I have no problems with the layout of these items, but landscaping should be carefully considered. The concentration of plantings on the north side of the property adjacent to Harbor View Road is good, but I hope to talk to the applicant's landscaper before Tuesday's meeting concern- ing the type and location of plantings on the west (downhill) and south sides of the property. Memorandum Next week's agenda items 4/18/83 Page 2 (3) Legal documents were submitted late. At this writing we still have not received information on the proposed land and building ownership arrangement. (4) Water department approval is pending. I cannot recommend final plat approval until these matters are resolved. I am particulary concerned that the landscaping requirements not be allowed to slide. 4) LePage This lot crosses Cl and R4 zones at the corner of White Street and Patchen Road. The Zoning Board has approved the requested beauty salon but has delayed action on any office use until a specific tenant is known. According to traffic standards in the zoning ordinance this small lot with previous residential use could be upgraded to commercial uses with up to 10 or 11 trips per hour. The proposed hair salon may slightly exceed that volume at times, but overall itisa reasonably low volume commercial use. Also, the applicant is relocating the one existing curb cut to a point further away from the main intersection. This improvement should be given some credit. 'However, permission for the office use may have to wait until after observation of traffic at the beauty salon. Gravel parking will be provided for 15 cars, an adequate number. However, one dimension is sub -standard, and a revision may result in the loss of one space. The adjacent property owner to the south currently parks on a portion of this property. Some resolution of this arrangement must be worked out. Some landscaping exists, including several trees along the property line of the one abutting residential use. Also, additional shrubs and trees will be planted according to our landscaping formula. 5) Bartlett Commercial Lots This is the second proposed grouping of lots within the overall commercially - approved portion of the Bartlett property. These 5 lots will complete subdivision of land on the south side of Harbor View Road. Proposed lots range from 45,000 to 65,000 square feet. All lots have an ample amount of usable area with the possible exception of lot 7 which is crossed by a "minor stream." Two pairs of lots will be able to share curb cuts and one lot will have its own entrance. If the initial 3 commercial lots are included, there will be a total of 5 curb cuts serving 8 lots with 1725 feet of frontage (one curb cut every 345 feet). This is a very satisfactory arrangement. Also, it appears likely that access for the large undeveloped commercial area north of Harbor View Road will be able to line up with one of the proposed joint curb cuts. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 26, 1983 development. Mr. Poger said a 60' right of way would be required. Mr. Jacob moved to continue the public hearing on the O'Brien Brothers, Inc. subdivision until two weeks from tonight, May 10, at 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion and all voted aye. Site plan application by Priscilla and Gerals LePage for a beauty salon and possible office at 40 Patchen Road Mrs. LePage said they would move the entrance drive away from the intersection on White Street. The drive will be 20' wide, leading to a gravel lot for 14 - 15 cars. She said her peak time of business probably produced about 10 cars, so she felt this would be plenty of parking. The large tree in the middle of the lot plus the line of sugar maples along the back line will be retained. There will be a minimum of a 17' wide grass strip between the parking lot and White St. A barrier will be placed between this lot and the one next to it on Patchen Road. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application by Priscilla and Gerald LePage for a beauty salon as depicted on a plan entitled "Proposed Beatity Salon, 40 Patchen Road" prepared by Priscilla LePage. dated 4 26 83. subject to the following stipulations: 1. The existing curb opening shall be closed and any disturbed road pave- ment patched. The new curb shall be a paved concrete depressed curb. 2. Plans for parking lot drainage shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. 3. In the northwest portion of the parking lot, one space shall be removed and two others lengthened so as to provi3e a minimum depth of 18 feet per parking space. 4. Vpstairs office use is not approved at this time. Traffic volume from the beauty salon shall be evaluated before the additional office space may be approved. 5. Bonding for landscaping (3600) and for curb relocation work shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. A revised site plan - containing required changes from stipulations 2 and 3 - shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. There shall be a barrier on the south side of the pro_perty to Prevent vehicular traffic between this and the next lot.�� 8. This approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion, and all voted for it. Sketch plan application by LTH Associates for five additional commercial lots in the, Bartlett Property development on Harbor View Road Mr. Krebs represented LTH. He said they would like access to lot 4 to be between the east line of lot 3 and where the plan says "200 1". Lots 5 & 6 will have a shared access, as would lots 7 & 8. Entrances for lots 4 and 9 should line up across the street, the Commission felt. Mr. +foolery felt that if another lot were going to be squeezed in on the other side of the road, lot 9 should be made a little narrower now and that lot shown on this plan. There were no problems expressed by the Commission with the plan. KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 199 Main St. WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404 (802) 655-3640 TO S� ZWlc k2 i�y- RJEUTEQ OF MnNLIVMLIVU0UML DATE 5 JOB NO, `/ ATTENTION ram, REPrna?.q Li WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ;4 Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED:6uhv PRODUCT 240-2 Ees Inc., Groton, Mass. 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 199 Main St. WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL d (802) 655-3640 v WE ARE SENDING YOU ,Q—A#tnhed ❑ Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings Prin stPrin stP ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ DATE JOB NO ATTENTION , RE: the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION - -- i-— THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted P—Ftir your use ❑ Approved as noted C"s requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY PRODUCT 240.2 � Im, Grown, Mm 01471. 4JSIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us 4 once. KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 199 Main St. WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404 (802) 655-3640 WE ARE SENDING YOU attached ❑ Under separate cover via LE TER OF TRANS ITTAL DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION PAG& RE: t- ❑ Shop drawings D--Pfints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: E?1 r approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections El ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO 4:�� SIGNED: PRODUCT 240.2 EeS Ion, Dmtoq M. 0 1471_ If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us a once. KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 199 Main St. WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404 (802) 655-3640 TO gym" & S / WE ARE SENDING YOU $ 7xttached ❑ Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings [.,;.rPrints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ NA T"T O T�RANS(Y1ITTAL DATE JOB 1110*�/ ATTENTIO RE: the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES D TE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑__Fw-your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US 1i7WA PRODUCT 24O-2 Inc., GroW, Mass 01471, SIGNED: "I If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us t once. -�. � _� - -- ♦ saooM ♦ r PUBLIC HEARG SOUTH BURLIN4pN PLANNING COMM51ON The South Burl ingtoPlann ing Commission will hoidt public hearing at the South irlington City Hall, Conference om, 575 Dorset Street, South Nington, Vermont on Tuesday, Aay 24, 1983, at 7:30 P.M. to cUder the following: 1) Final Plat APPlicatioW LTH Associates for six n( com. mercial lots on Harbor Road in the Bartlett Property velop- ment. Property Is bound n the west by Shelburne Roa n the north by Beres Co rpor n, on the north and east by of lands of the applicant, and on south i by Allenwood Home, Coi d In- vestment Group, and Fi Bur lington Realty Corporaticl 2) Final Plat Applica by Homestead Design, Inc., a b- lot subdivision on Bartle Bay Rood. Property Is bounde the northeast by the South Budgton sewage treatment plant, I the south by Borttetts Bay Ro, and on the west by Butte'eld, Shearer, Campbell, Flcers, Bruhn, Irish, and Mackay. Copies of the applicationare available for public inspect' of the South Burlington City H. Sidney B. ger Ch%,n, South Burl iton Planning Commion Mav 7, 1983 _ 3033 Eartletf Iroled� C J012.1]' IA 73D STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DECISION AND FINDING OF FACT On the 27th day of September 1993, the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment heard evidence regarding the appeal of Enterprises Car Rental, Hoyt Gahagan, 1810 Shelburne Road based on the following facts and findings: 1) Applicant is requesting permission to operate a car rental agency in conjunction with an existing car wash and auto detailing center. 2) Lot contains approximately 3 acres which exceeds the minimum lot size for uses as proposed. 3) Traffic not affected, trip ends proposed for this use are acceptable. 4) No additional coverage, building existing. No impact on municipal facilities. 5) Character of area will not be affected. Area zoned for automobile related uses. Based upon the above facts and findings the appellant's request for a conditional us i hereijyA owed. ` Chairman, South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment SOUTH i. AINGTO, C LERK'S C �- Z 1JhR-509 V1L v � STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DECISION AND FINDING OF FACT On the 27th day of September 1993, the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment heard evidence regarding the appeal of Enterprises Car Rental, Hoyt Gahagan, 1810 Shelburne Road based on the following facts and findings: 1) Applicant is requesting permission to operate a car rental agency in conjunction with an existing car wash and auto detailing center. 2) Lot contains approximately 3 acres which exceeds the minimum lot size for uses as proposed. 3) Traffic not affected, trip ends proposed for this use are acceptable. 4) No additional coverage, building existing. No impact on municipal facilities. 5) Character of area will not be affected. Area zoned for automobile related uses. Based upon the above facts and findings the appellant's request for a conditional us i hereyyp owed. ` Chairman, South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment SOUTH ..: AINGTO, C LERK'S C