Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH 1 - Supplemental - 0021 Gregory DrivePLANNER 658-7955 Amy Gregory ICV 126 College Burlington, City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 Street, Suite 2C Vermont 05401 January 14, 1994 Re: Sewer Allocation, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on January 11, 1994 approved a 38,137 square foot building for general office and warehouse use. A total sewer allocation of 1200 gpd was approved for this project. This project would be served by the Airport Parkway Treatment facility which has adequate capacity to handle this demand. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cerely, J Weith, City Planner JW/mcp /17 Memorandum - Planning January 11, 1994 agenda items January 7, 1994 Page 3 5) INVESTORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT - OFFICE/WAREHOUSE - SITE PLAN This project consists of the construction of a one (1) story 38,137 square foot office/warehouse building in two (2) phases. Phase 1 would consist of 22,232 square feet of warehouse and related office use and phase 2 would consist of 15,905 square feet of office use. This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission on 8/11/92 and denied on 9/29/92 (minutes and decision enclosed). The Zoning Board of Adjustment granted the applicant a conditional use permit for the multiple use on 12/13/93. This property located at 21 Gregory Drive (lot #1 Green Tree Park) lies within the I-C District. It is bounded on the north by light manufacturing (Resolution, Inc.), on the east by Gregory Drive and on the south and west by Shunpike Road. Access/circulation: Access will be provided via a 30 foot curb cut on Gregory Drive. It is located as far from the Gregory Drive/Shunpike Road intersection as possible. Circulation is adequate. Coveraqe/setbacks: Building coverage is 25% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 63.1% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage along Gregory drive is 11% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements will be met. Parking: Phase 1 of the project requires 22 parking spaces and 41 spaces including two (2) handicapped spaces will be provided. Phase 2 of the project requires 64 spaces and 71 spaces, including three (3) handicapped spaces and bicycle storage facilities, are being provided. A total of 86 spaces are required. Total parking provided for both phases is 112 spaces including five (5) handicapped spaces. The note on the plan should be revised to indicate 71 spaces in Phase 2 and 112 total spaces. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on! building costs, is $14,500. Phase 1 requirement is $10,500 which is being met. Phase 2 requirement is $4,000 which is not being $k met. The total short fall for the project is $2,000. This shortfall should be made up by either increasing size of plant N material or adding more plants to Phase 2 of the project. '\k Plantings will include Spirea, Crabapple, Barberry, Pin Oak and Austrian Pine. The plan shows $2,770 worth of plantin s which are mop 16SUOFv —A ,..e.. 4�+�` U' u u ° •�'' L�}�l�' /""'. `^"e°a� � IP°t,� Memorandum - Planning January 11, 1994 agenda items January 7, 1994 Page 4 required to be planted as a condition of approval for the Green Tree Park subdivision. This landscaping can not be counted towards the applicant's landscaping requirement. Traffic: The applicant will be required to contribute $2381 to the Williston Road Impact Fund - Area 2 for the 16.5 vehicle trip ends ( vte' s ) expected to be generated by Phase 1 and $ 7 , 15 8 for the 49.6 vte's expected to be generated by Phase 2. Sewer: The sewer allocation needed for Phase I is 225 gpd and for Phase 2 is 975 gpd for a total allocation of 1200 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit. Lighting: Exterior lighting for Phase I will consist of the following: --- three (3) 100 watt high pressure sodium lamps on 14 foot poles with cutoff luminaries. --- nine (9) building mounted 100 watt high pressure sodium lamps with cut-offs. Phase 2 lighting will consist of the following: --- six (6) buildings mounted 100 watt high pressure sodium lamps with cut-offs. --- one (1) 100 watt high pressure sodium lamp on a 14 foot pole with cut-off luminaire. t Snow storage easement: The plan shows a f ive ( 5 ) foot snow storage easement along Shunpike Road in the wrong location. This easement is located entirely on the applicant's property parallel to the-� property. The plan should be revised to show the correct location. The legal document for this easement should be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney and recorded prior to permit. Other: G,r y --- screened dumpster enclosures will be provided for both phases. --- a 15 foot storm drain easement is shown along Gregory Drive. --- plan should be revised to show location of a fire hydrant to be installed as part of Phase 2 of construction in a location approved by the Fire Chief. 4 j'2�>7z MOTION OF APPROVAL ICV I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Investors Corporation of Vermont for construction of a 38,137 square foot building for general office use (15,905 square feet) and warehouse use (22,232 square feet) in two (2) phases as depicted on a plan entitled "l Green Tree Park, S. Burlington, VT", prepared by Robert Ste. Marie, Architect, and dated 11/15/93, last revised 12/29/93, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The applicant shall post a $13,270 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for Phase I and a $4,000 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for Phase II. The bonds shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The landscaping which was required as a condition of approval for the Green Tree Park subdivision shall be planted as part of Phase I. 3. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to show the changes listed below. The revised plan shall require approval by the City Planner. a) The plan shall show an additional $2,000 worth of landscaping in a location and of a size and species approved by the City Planner. b) the plan shall show the correct location of the snow storage easement. c) the plan shall show an additional fire hydrant, which shall be installed as part of Phase II, in a location approved by the fire chief. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for Phase I, the applicant shall contribute $2,381 to the Williston Road Area 2 Improvement Fund based on the additional 16.5 peak hour vte's estimated to be generated by this Phase. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for Phase II, the applicant shall contribute $7,158 to the Williston Road Area 2 Improvement Fund based on the additional 49.6 peak hour vte's estimated to be generated by this Phase. 5. An total sewer allocation of 1,200 g.p.d. is granted, 225 gpd for Phase I and 975 gpd for Phase II. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 6. All exterior lighting shall be downcasting and shielded and shall not cast light beyond the property line. Any change in existing lighting or new lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 7. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the property owner shall record a snow storage easement in the South Burlington Land Records. A draft easement shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to recording. 8. The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit for Phase I within six ( 6 ) months and a zoning/building permit for Phase II within two (2) years, or this approval is null and void. 9. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of each Phase. 10. Any changes to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. (mo-icv) INVESTORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT ICV Construction, Inc. 40'merican International Distribution Corporation January 10, 1994 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sewer Allocation Dear Joe: Pending the Planning Commission's approval of the development of Lot 1, Greentree Park, ICV requests an allocation for this facility of municipal sewer of 945 gpd. Please forward a letter approving this allocation as required for our Act 250 application. Thank you, and please call if you need anything further. Sincerely,, Amy C. Veg ry ACG\dml D:\INV\WEITH.CP Suite 2C, 126 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 863-2311 FAX (802) 863-2313 'ii City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 7, 1994 Amy C. Gregory ICV 126 College Street, Suite 2C Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Office/Warehouse Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Jim Goddette were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, January 11, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. irAcerely, Joe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: APPLICATION OF INVESTORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT This matter came before the South Burlington Planning Commission pursuant to the provisions of Section 19.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations on application of Investors Corporation of Vermont hereinafter "Applicant" for construction of a 37,500 square foot building in two (2) phases (Phase I - 25,000 square feet; Phase II - 12,500 square feet) for warehousing and related office use as depicted on a plan entitled, "l Green Tree Park, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Robert Ste. Marie, Architect and dated 6/8/92, stamped received 8/18/92. The Planning Commission conducted public meetings on this application on August 11 and August 25, 1992. The Applicant was present at only the August 11, 1992 meeting. Based on evidence submitted at the meeting and as part of the application, the Planning Commission hereby renders the following decision on this application: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Greentree Park, Inc. is the owner of record of the property which is the subject of this application. Investors Corporation of Vermont is the applicant. 2. This project consists of constructing a 37,500 square foot one (1) story building for warehouse and related office use in two (2) phases. Phase I is 25,000 square feet (20,000 square feet office and 5,000 square feet warehouse) and Phase II is 12,500 square feet (10,000 square feet office and 2,500 square feet warehouse). 3. The Planning Commission reviewed a site plan for a 64,800 square foot office building on this same lot on 1/23/90. The application was subsequently withdrawn. 4. This property located at 21 Gregory Drive (lot #1, Green Tree Park) is within the IC District. It is bounded on the north by light manufacturing (Resolution, Inc.), on the east by Gregory Drive, and on the south and west by Shunpike Road. 5. Access/circulation: Access is proposed to be via a 30 foot curb cut on Gregory Drive. This curb cut is not opposite the W.W. Grainger curb cut its location is as far from the Gregory Drive/Shunpike Road intersection as possible. 6. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 24.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 68.3% (maximum allowed is 70%). These percentages represent the total for both phases. Front yard coverage along Gregory Drive is 12.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). 7. Landscaping: The landscaping requirement for the entire project is $22,500. Phase I landscaping requirement is $15,075 and for Phase II it is $7,425. The plan submitted shows a total of $17,695 which is $4,805 short of the requirement. The plan shows $3, 595 worth of plantings which are required to be planted as a condition of approval for the Green Tree Park subdivision. This landscaping can not be counted towards the applicant's landscaping requirement. The site plan does not show the existing street trees along Gregory Drive. Some of the landscaping at the northwest corner of the lot is shown on the adjacent property. 8. Parking: This entire project requires a total of 152 parking spaces (101 spaces for Phase I and 51 spaces for Phase II). This large number of parking spaces is due to the large percentage of proposed office space. The plan shows 120 spaces, a shortfall of 32 spaces or 21%. 9. Lighting: The plan does not show any exterior lighting information. 10. Snow storage: A five (5) foot snow storage easement which exists along Shunpike Road in not shown. 11. Fire Hydrants: The plan does not show the hydrant on Gregory Drive in the location requested by the Fire Chief nor does it show the additional hydrant requested. CONCLUSIONS 1. Section 19.104 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations requires that the Applicant spend a certain amount on new landscaping based on 3% of the development cost from 0 - $250,000, 2% for the next $250,000 and 1% for cost above $500,000. The total development cost is $1,500,000. This results in a minimum landscaping requirement of $22,500. The plan submitted shows a total of $17,695 which is $4,805 short of the requirement. The Planning Commission concludes that the proposed landscaping is inadequate and that Section 19.104 of the zoning regulations is not being met. 2. Section 19.101a. of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations requires that the site plan include certain information including existing vegetation and easements. Since the site plan submitted does not show the existing street trees along Gregory Drive and the snow storage easement along Shunpike Road the Planning Commission concludes that Section 19.101a. of the zoning regulations is not E being met. 3. Table I, Off -Street Parking and Loading, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations requires this project to provide a total of 152 parking spaces (101 spaces for Phase I and 51 spaces for Phase II). The plan shows 120 spaces, a shortfall of 32 spaces or 21%. The Planning Commission therefore concludes that the off- street parking requirement required under Table I of the zoning regulations is not being met. 4. Section 19.102e of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations allows the Planning Commission to impose conditions with respect to a list of items including outdoor lighting and fire protection. The plan submitted does not provide any outdoor lighting details nor does it provide for one (1) additional fire hydrant and the relocation of an existing hydrant as requested by the Fire Chief. The Planning Commission therefore concludes that Section 19.102e of the zoning regulations is not being met. DECISION Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the Planning Commission makes the following decision: The Planning Commission hereby denies the Applicant's request for construction of a 37,000 square foot building for warehousing and related office use at 25 Gregory Drive for the following reasons: 1. The application does not meet the requirements of Section 19.104 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The landscaping requirement is not being met. 2. The application does not meet the requirements of Section 19.101a of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The site plan does not show existing street trees along Gregory Drive and the snow storage easement along Shunpike Road. 3. The application does not meet the Off -Street Parking and Loading requirements under Table I of the South Burlington Regulations. The project requires a total of 152 parking spaces and the site plan shows only 120 spaces. 3 4. The application does not meet the requirements of Section 19.102e of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The Applicant has not provided details on outdoor lighting nor provided an additional fire hydrant and relocated the existing hydrant. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont this 2q& day of 1992. Chairman or G-1- rk South Burlington Planning Commission 4 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 August 1992 page 4 Mr. Farrell said there would not. If they later decide they want it, they will come back to the Commission for approval. Ms. Peacock moved the Commission approve the site plan applica- tion of Anthony Gamache for chan e of use of 1850 sq. ft. within an_existinq retail center to a 36-seat restaurant as depicted on 1. The applicant shall post a $750, 3-year landscapin bond prior to issuance of a _Kgi1Lng /buildin permit. 2.-Any-new lighting,shall be downcastin shielded luminaire and shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 3. As expressly represented by the applicant, there shall be no outside seating at this site. 4. The zonin /buildin permit shall be obtained within_ 6 months_ or this approval is null and void. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimouslv. Mr. Austin rejoined the Commission. 6. Site Plan application of Investors Corporation of Vermont for construction of a 37,500 sq. ft. building in two phases for warehousing and related office use, lot #1, Green Tree Industrial Park, Gregory Drive: Amy Gregory located the property at the corner of Shunpike Rd. She said there would be 25,000 sq. ft. built in phase 1 and 12,000 in phase 2. Traffic has been projected at 80% warehouse use and 20% office. Ms. Gregory noted their access is not directly across from the Granger curb cut as tractor trailers need access in the rear of the lot. She said they will have the best landscaped lot in Green Tree Park. Mr. Weith noted they show only the original subdivision landscaping and are signifi- cantly short for the new building. He said this application needs $15,000 in landscaping for phase 1 and $7,000 in phase 2. This is over and above what was required at subdivision. Mr. Craig asked if the revised plan satisfies this requirement. Mr. Weith said he hadn't had a chance to check as it was just handed to him. Ms. Gregory said it did not. Regarding parking, Ms. Gregory said they are asking for more than the facility seems to need. If there is more office use, they will need the parking. Mr. Burgess said there is no point in having additional parking if the problem is going to be traffic. Mr. Craig said he didn't want to have the parking for a use that PLANNING COMMISSION 11 August 1992 page 5 may not be there. He wanted to see a consistant plan. Mr. Williams said they are looking at a worst case scenario. Mr. Austin noted they are asking for twice the amout of parking needed and he felt that didn't make sense. Ms. Peacock agreed. Mr. Craig said that is the number required if it were 100% office use. Mrs. Maher said she was not willing to approve all that parking. Mr. Burgess felt it was extreme and said the applicant was not likely.to get 100% office use without considerable review and he would vote for green space and ask the applicant not to have the additional parking. Mr. Weith noted that there is a question as to the need for an additional fire hydrant. Mrs. Maher said she wou-id---ask--that there be more hardwood trees. Mr. Craig moved to continue the hearing until 25 August. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Public Hearing: Continue consideration of proposed amendment to the South Burlington Zoning Regulations to establish a new Section 19.17, Design Control District: Mr. Weith said the City Attorney was comfortable with the proposeed wording. He felt that adding Section 19.172c was a good idea. He did raise the question of design vs. site plan criteria. Mr. Burgess raised the question of having an appli- cant go through site plan review when what they want to change is the color of the building. He didn't feel this was fair to a building owner. Mrs. Maher suggested a list of exclusions that would not trigger site plan review. Mr. Weith said he would work this into the Ordinance. Ms. Peacock raised the question of mentioning public amenities in the Central District Zone. She noted it is encouraged in the Zoning Regulations for the Central District but is very general. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the discussion until 25 August. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Review proposed application for FY 1993 Planning Grant from the State of Vermont: Members felt the proposal looked excellent. Mr. Craig moved to approve the proposed application for FY 1993 Planning Grant from the State. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION %9 September 1992 page 10 the project to the north. These interconnections cannot simply be four or five internal roads. They need to be one public road designed to a higher standard. The installation of a new signaled access road will improve traffic conditions on Shelburne Road across from Laurel Hill Drive. Improvements they would recommend to try and maximize the new access road would be exclusive turning lanes and an additional turning lane on Laurel Hill Drive. Mr. Weith suggested that in his analysis they should address the bottleneck problem at Green Mountain Drive and Bartlett Bay Road. They should look at it and see it there is any solution. They should give the Planning Commission an indication on how more detrimental or worse it will function with the new peak hour traffic added to the corridor. Nr. Craig felt they should have phasing plans linked with the road. I'lr. Sheahan stated his concern w_iuid be the major corinector road and possible options of where it can go. Mr. I3uruess asked Mr. DiUIC1cison wh:rn he does intersection impacts is he going to be assuming that the road is connected all the way through to Queen City Park. 1'1r. C-ickinson stated he does an either/or scenario. He will look at this area in further detail. Mrs. I•Iaher stated it plea -,es her that the design is a mini --city center for the Shelburne Roma area and not just another giant shopping center. Mr. Durcless said that the Flannirig Commission hasn't seen much specific in the way of design. There is no opposition to design conCef-t.ually and he doesn't know di everything is practical. The biggest issues will be traffic, access: and circulation. C'. Cc:)nt i.rlue site plan application of Investors '-:01-poration of Vermont for construction of a -17, '500 square toot building in two i:_'i phases for warehousincl and rE_iateci office use, iot ill, Green Tree In-_iustrial Park, Gregory Driv-. Nc, one appeared for the applicant. GatherinE Peacock moved tt,E=t _bZA k_J on the —Firic3irn1. of Fact and Conclusions dated ;: eptembe?r_- _- J1, 1 , tht;_!'lanninq l.ommis6ion thE' :f o 11 c) w i nq decision PLANNING COMMISSION 29 September 1992 page 11 The Planning Commission hereby denies the Investor's Corporation of Vermont's request for construction of a 37,000 square foot building for warehousing and related office use at 25 Gregory Drive for the following reasons: 1. The application does not meet the requirements of Section 19.104 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The landscaping requirement is not being met. 2. The application does not meet the requirements of Section 19.101a of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The site plan_ does_not show existing street trees along Gregory Drive and the snow storage easement along Shunpike Road. 3. The application does not meet the Off -Street Parking and Loading requirements under Table I of the South Burlington Regulations. The project requires a total of 152 parking spaces and the site plan shows only 120 spaces. 4. The application does not meet the requirements of Section 19.102e of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The Applicant has not provided details on outdoor lighting nor provided an additional fire hydrant: and relocated the existip hydrant. Mrs. Maher seconded._ The motion to deny passed unanimously_ 7. Public Hearing: Continue consideration off.'t, a proposed amendment to the South Burlington Zoning Regulations to establish a new Section 19.17, Design Control District. PIr. Burgess stated they had questions on whether they conduct one or two hearings and whether they have one or two votes. Mr. Weith informed the Planning Commission they would be reviewing two applications, one for site plan and one for design review and they could do both applications under one agenda item. The motion to approve would have to approve both the site plan application and the review application. They should strike Section 19.17 #2c. He also exempted signs from design review under the second paragraph on the first page in the last sentence. Mr. _Craig movedthat the Plann_i_2_ Commission approve the Design Control District as amF-nded and forward it to the City Council with a recommendationI•I _ for —approval.. _r. Sheahan seconded_ The motion oassed unanimously. - ---- - .— --- — M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Raymond J. Belai #,zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, January 11, 1994 agenda items Date: December 6, 1993 GARY BOURNE - ADD RETAIL USE TO SERVICE STATION - SITE PLAN --- ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates that adding this retail use to a service station will increase P.M. peak hour trip ends by 9. Service station use currently far exceeds the trip end limits, therefore, the only way the Planning Commission can approve this application is if they find that the applicant is making a change which will result in a net benefit to traffic flow, or applicant must show that trip ends will not increase. --- provide size of lot. --- plan should show a minimum of 11 parking spaces including one (1) handicapped space. --- plan should show dumpsters, dumpsters must be screened. --- plan should show all existing and any proposed exterior lighting locations, applicant should provide lighting details including types, wattage, etc. --- access to service annex to the east should be labeled. INVESTORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT - OFFICE/WAREHOUSE - SITE PLAN --- for phase 1, provide the following: square footage of office, number of non -office employees and number of company vehicles operating from the premises. --- indicate the landscaping to be planted with each phase. Landscaping for each phase must be consistent with the const ruction cost of each phase. --- show building mounted and pole lights for phase II, if any and indicate wattage to be used. --- site plan approval is valid for six (6) months with a six month extension approval by the Planning Commission. If the applicant does not anticipate starting construction on phase 2 within one (1) year of approval, he should apply for a multi -phase project under Section 20.302 of the zoning regulations. The applicant should indicate the length of time being requested. This request should be made in writing. --- landscaping proposed is $4,225 short of the $14,500 requirement. Applicant should increase size of proposed plantings or propose additional plantings. Plantings to be Preliminary Memo - Planning January 11, 1994 agenda items December 6, 1993 Page 2 provided by Green Tree Park Association can not be counted towards the landscaping requirement. --- provide front yard coverage percentage along Gregory Drive. --- if phase 2 will have a dumpster, it must be shown and screened. --- bicycle parking facilities should be provided (Section 19.253b of the zoning regulations). LAKEWOOD COMMONS - 7 LOT PUD-REVISED FINAL PLAT --- survey plat has a revision date of 10/14/94, how is this possible? --- a note should be added to the survey plat indicating that lot "G" will serve as the common right-of-way to lots A-F. --- will the projection on the east side of lot B be a part of lot "B"? If so, then all dimensions must be shown and area included in the lot. GAGNON'S DAY SCHOOL - DAY CARE FACILITY - SITE PLAN Plan should be revised to show the following information: --- lot dimensions --- scale of plan --- north arrow --- show location of dumpster, if one is to be used, and it must be screened. --- show locations of existing and proposed exterior lighting. --- show all existing and any proposed landscaping. --- show all lawn areas and gravel ares, they should be labeled. Other comments: --- provide coverage information for building, overall and front yard. --- access drive must be widened to 20 feet. --- submit details of existing and proposed exterior lighting including type and wattage. --- this application results in the property generating 2.9 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour more that the Traffic Overlay District permits. The Planning Commission will have to decide whether to approve this level of traffic. --- applicant will be required to contribute $2,336 to Williston Road Area #2 Traffic Improvement Fund for the 16.19 additional trip ends to be generated. No Text Memorandum August 25, August 21, Page 2 - Planning 1992 agenda items 1992 o Recreation/Pedestrian Path - Council would like existing and proposed recreation/pedestrian path easements shown on the official map. o School improvements - Council directed staff to contact the School board to see if there are any school improvements which should be included on the map. Staff will do further research on these issues in preparation for a discussion at the next Planning Commission meeting (9/15). 3) ICV OFFICE/WAREHOUSE - 21 GREGORY DRIVE - SITE PLAN This application was continued from the August 11, 1992 meeting. This project consists of constructing a 37,500 square foot one (1) story building for warehouse and related office use in two (2) phases. The applicant has changed the percentage of office space to warehouse space from 20% - 80% to 80% - 20%. Phase I is 25,000 square feet (5,000 square feet warehouse and 20,000 square feet office) and Phase II is 12,500 square feet (2,500 square feet warehouse and 10,000 square feet office). This seems to be an unusually high percentage of office space for a warehouse use(s). The Planning Commission reviewed a site plan for a 64,800 square foot office building on this same lot on 1/23/90 (minutes were enclosed with the August llth memo). The application was subsequently withdrawn. This property located at 23 Gregory Drive (lot #1, Green Tree Park) is within the IC District. It is bounded on the north by light manufacturing (Resolution, Inc.), on the east by Gregory Drive, and on the south and west by Shunpike Road. E Memorandum August 25, August 21, Page 3 - Planning 1992 agenda items 1992 Access/circulation: Access is proposed to be via a 30 foot curb cut on Gregory Drive. This curb cut is not opposite the W.W. Grainger curb cut but staff supports its location which is as far from the Gregory Drive/Shunpike Road intersection as possible. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 24.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 68.3% (maximum allowed is 70%). These percentages represent the total for both phases. Front yard coverage along Gregory Drive is 12.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Traffic: Based on I.T.E. code 150 "Warehousing", the project will generate 27.75 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The I.T.E. trip rate for warehousing is based on 1000 gross square feet of the building. The general office use trip rate (code #710) is not used for the office portion of the warehouse because warehousing is the primary use and office space is ancillary to the warehousing operation. Based on this normal procedure for estimating trip generation for warehousing uses, this project will be required to contribute $4,004 to the Williston Road Improvement Fund (Area 2) based on the 27.75 trip ends. However, since the applicant is proposing an unusually high percentage of office space within this warehousing building, it may be more appropriate to separate the office square footage from the warehouse square footage and apply the different trip generation rates (i.e., code #150, warehousing and code #710, general office). Based on this methodology,the proposed project is estimated to generate 102.75 vte's during the peak hour. The applicant would be required to contribute $14,827 to the Williston Road Area 2 Improvement Fund. Landscaping: The landscaping requirement for the entire project is $22,500. Phase I landscaping requirement is $15,075 and for Phase II it is $7,425. The plan submitted shows a total of $17,695 which is $4,805 short of the requirement. The plan shows $3,595 worth of plantings which are required to be planted as a condition of approval for the Green Tree Park subdivision. This landscaping can not be counted towards the applicant's 3 Memorandum August 25, August 21, Page 4 - Planning 1992 agenda items 1992 landscaping requirement. The site plan does not show the existing street trees along Gregory Drive. Some of the landscaping at the northwest corner of the lot is shown on the adjacent property. All proposed landscaping should be shown on the applicant's property. The plan should have a note indicating the type and quantity of plantings along the northerly boundary. The plan indicates that there are six (6) Pin Oaks along Shunpike Road but only four (4) of these trees are shown. In an effort to reduce the shortfall in required landscaping, staff recommends that the size of proposed Pin Oak be increased to 3"-3 1/2" and that more deciduous street trees be planted along the western property line. Parking: The entire project requires a total of 152 parking spaces (101 spaces for Phase I and 51 spaces for Phase II) This large number of parking spaces is due to the large percentage of proposed office space. The plan shows 120 spaces, a shortfall of 32 spaces or 21%. Approval extension: Pursuant to Section 10.302 of the zoning regulations, the applicant is requesting a two (2) year approval for Phase II of this multi -phase project instead of the normal six (6) month period. Phase I will still be subject tot -he six (6) month. Sewer: Sewer allocation for the entire project is 1,080 gpd. The allocation for Phase I is 720 gpd and for Phase II is 360 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee at the time the zoning building permit is issued for each phase. Lighting: The current plan does not show any exterior lighting information. This was shown on the previous plan but omitted on this new plan. Other: --- a screened dumpster will be provided on the north side of the building. --- a 15 foot storm drain easement is sown along Gregory Drive. 4 Memorandum August 25, August 21, Page 5 - Planning 1992 agenda items 1992 --- a five (5) foot snow storage easement along Shunpike Road is not shown. --- the relocated fire hydrant should be moved adjacent to the access drive as shown on a previously submitted plan, and a new hydrant should be installed at the southeast corner of the parking lot in the green area next to the Crabapple tree. This was recommended by the Fire Chief. 4) L&M PARK - MULTI -FAMILY REVISION - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of the reduction in the number of multi- family buildings from seven (7) to five (5). The number of dwelling units will remain at 150. The applicant will need to obtain a conditional use permit from the Zoning Board of Adjustment. This property located in the rear of the L&M Park site is within the Cl zone. It is bounded on the north by undeveloped lands owned by Pomerleau, on the east by an auto dealership and the commercial portion of L&M Park, on the south by undeveloped land owned by Farrell and on the west by railroad tracks owned by Vermont Railway. Access/circulation: Access will be via a private drive off from Fayette Drive at the same location as previously proposed. The access drive will have a 140 foot long island separating ingress and egress traffic. Circulation of traffic on the site is acceptable. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage for the residential portion will increase from 6% to 6.6% (maximum allowed is 20%). Overall coverage will increase from 22% to 28% (maximum allowed is 40%). Setback requirements will be met. Parking: The residential portion requires a total of 338 parking spaces and the plan shows 338 parking spaces. Eight (8) handicapped parking spaces are required. 5 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 6, 1993 Amy C. Gregory ICV 126 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Office/Warehouse Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please respond to these comments, if appropriate, with additional information and/or revised plans by no later than Thursday, December 30, 1993. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, n Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp lm� INVESTORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT 101 Construction, Inc. Managed Forest Resources menc, n International 'Distribution Corporation November 22, 1993 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington Offices 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Joe: Enclosed for filing please find the following in connection with 12 Gregory Drive: 1. Site plan application 2. 5 full size and 1 11" x 17" site plan 3. Application fee of $50.00 Please contact me should you have any questions. Thank you for putting this on the Planning Commission agenda on the next available date. Your assistance is appreciated. Sincerely, Amy C. eg ry 7 ACG\dml Enclosure cc: Ken Desmond 7 Green Tree Drive South Burlington D:\INV\PLANNER.I2G Suite 2C, 126 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 863-2311 FAX (802) 863-2313 No Text INVESTORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT ICV' Construction, (nC. Managed Forest Resources mem ,n. Intcrn.itional Distribution Corporation November 22, 1993 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington Offices 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Joe: Enclosed for filing please find the following in connection with 12 Gregory Drive: 1. Site plan application 2. 5 full size and 1 11" x 17" site plan 3. Application fee of $50.00 Please contact me should you have any questions. Thank you for putting this on the Planning Commission agenda on the next available date. Your assistance is appreciated. Sincerely, Amy C. eg ry ACG\dml Enclosure cc: Ken Desmond 7 Green Tree Drive South Burlington D:\INV\PLANNER.I2G SUitC 2C, 126 Collc,,re Street Burlington, `,'crmom O -iOl (802) tit,,;- -') 11 FAX (8,02) �;O"' "'13 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1 ) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address , phone tt ) Greentree Park, Inc. , c/o Ken Desmond, Powerline Communications, Gregory Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 653-6445 2 ) APPLICANT (name, address , phone n ) Investors Corporation of Vermont, 126 College Street, Burlington, VT 05401 363-2311 3 ) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone = ) kiy C. Gregory/Skip Williams ICV, 126 College Street, Burlington, VT 05401 863-2311 4 ) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS : Gregory Drive & Shunpike Road 5) LOT NUMBER ( i f applicable) _mot #1 , Greentree Park 6) PROPOSED USE(S) office/warehouse 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, - units, maximum height and a floors, square feet per floor) total size= 38,137 ft. to be constructioned in 2 phases, 20,000 ft. each. One story, 20 ft. maximum height 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 15 phase one, 60-65 phase two Total 80 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 25 %; landscaped areas 37 % building, parking, outside storage 63 % 400K (Phase 1) 3000 (Phase 1) 10 ) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 300K (Ph 2) , Landscaping $ 6000 (Phase 2) Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 1 1 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: •June 1994 (Phase I ),.June 1995 (Phase 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 485. Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon ; 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 406 (P.M. Peak) = 70 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:30 A.M. to . 5:00 P.M. 14 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING G\AATURE OF APPLICANT Usl, .,h-ere-darrdai-resistant features are ,,,eded ORDERING SEQUENCE CATALOG NUMBER VOLTAGE [7_70PTio—Ns--7, _ �y1� _ -- ••I{f •_ .. - — \�i�•lto. I^M�Ii.�� CIYY,.r �— -.__ _may._ rn,,,llly Ilul IWI' Illlrit !iNt' {i!'dili�t iill{hN„wcu r.q'fv,l (Ii�:wV ou(YI /..� / 1 1l t' I 1+.., .�Ir i.r., rl•. ,, •J !• ,,,o t-. .ud II:,IPII •.nt'/1 LS Lamp Support (mogul socket only) CR Corrosion -Resistant Finish (polyester - back hsg. only) CRT Corroslon-Resistant Finish (teflon - back hsq. only) FS Full Shield for IES Cutoff 0BL Architectural Color - Black OMB Architectural Color - Medium Bronzo nWH Architectural Color - White p Shipped Separately' WG Wire Guard r -1 W - 16Yo (419cm)m) ACCESSORIES (FioldInstalled) 0 , 7 y'i (19.7 crn) Ordered 5uparate(y. See Building Mounted Options Section. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Weight Wattage Ballad LbY. Kg. l High Pro ure Sodium • Mod/Clear 100 HX-HPF 14 6 150 15 7 Metal Halide - Med(100)/M1og(175)/Clear 100 CWA 16 5 175 16 5 Mercury Vapor - Mog/Coatod 100 CWA 11 5 175 21 5 NOTES: `( ' Provldad with dual tap (120/277V) bailast whon ordered as 120V or 277V. ' Multi -tap Ballast (120,208,240,277V). ' May be ordered as accessory. MUST see Bldg. Mtd. Options section. fA W_ I .IHI.1 i=> -u 10;-LI( lY _U"ASQUARP00cff�' I SERIES CEILING MOUNT LUMINAiAE Lumasquare tl Series otie'rs an aestnenaliy styled archKwc�tura! luminaire with superieor performance designed fo; any induorfoutdohr lighting application. The rugged, die-cast housing is designed for laSting beauty and' Strength. The vertical burning lamp which is positioned within a vacuum metallized hydrotormed relidctor achieves minimum evicienc:es of 82.84%. This ;uminairg ig ;deal for car tots, canopies, parking garaps, or any application where an anfaclive high performances fixture la rgquired. Housing — Bugged, dire cast housing has a durable bronze 1. EKTROCOTEm finish. Mounts ovsi mancard J-box and fsaiures tNo con-ienient ti2'side bubs for aur'lace conduit mounting. Refractor — One-piece, in)eetion rnoldad, clear prismati"; recrytie or polyGarbonato for oven light distriDution and low glare. Fuily gasketed for Integrity. Available with standard high transmittance acrytic featuring 82.84% afrciencies or optional vandal resistant potycarbonate featuring 63-66% efficiencies. Rafl"tor — One-piece, hydroformed aluminum, vacuum metallized for high specularity and rofleclivity, completely fluted tot even light distlibutipn Oral full lamp We. Lamp Factory installed clear nrediurtl base lamp. RallBit — •401F starting, 60 Hz. HIPS ballastry available in 70. 100, 150 wan HPF or NPF versions. Metal halide is available with a 120r277 volt •20°F starting HP;: ballast. Performance I.E.S. Type 7 square cistributton. Additional F*aturts — Optional 120-277 volt button type photocorrtroi or fusing; chip resistant LektroCote finish; stainless steel vandal resistnnt screws standard; U.L. 1572 listed, sullable fur weft locations. ORDERING INFORMATION Mountins Wattage voltage war p*Ctor Flctrsckorl�IbWs. �i94. mlurf rft65supe tiomum yNlq�-417>►►' oilinpr(`,pnduil 70 120/277 HPF Atrylic 17 7.7 .MSG-�txBb• Cou lyplConCult 100 OUK11 HPF Acrylic 13 a, 11o'-41444• • Geih0giCor4u1( I Ouad HPF •ACrYk 19 8.6 NF4Q-4171S1• C67IrnQiCondurt 70 120 NPF Acrylic 16 7.2 '1 p*41$w c4iioolcotidud 100 126 NPF Acrylic 17 7.7 11WWi461 CeiGngrCondun 15q 120 NPF AcryUt 18 @.2 METAL tv1.0 'ti'; '4i�il1 • . ... C0 01gdQit 1 CP 1:Ur2rr NPF Acrylc Is 8.2 'RV.twon factory Utstauod medtijm tie lamp. .To 00or Pobcarbw4l* W!aCV *0 ft Ax _ P. OPTIONS The following factory applied options are availatalo. Order ,vile) lixturc by adding appropriate 8uHiX li+r�crSplfQA poeyeutaorulto rattaeka PT440conuvl (U'a'ar.-/$A) FUSIA0 Fof lir1iii lusiN ar'p ^*^Wtot• rooJaCa (z) N11n; t-t24 vale 2 tiO3 volt; 3.240 voit 4.2r7 vok —i —F(X} 1 (�7S SER7S�_� POLE/CEIL.IN MOUNT LUMINAIRE The MAGNUSC,,JARE0 : series is availablq in 70-150 war, HPS wid 175 matt metal halide versions. This Ivrninaire series is ideal for pole or ceiling mount inwillations. For additional products and vrderirly ioforrnatlon, refer to pnga GO. l.I htlno Dlvl>efanr4 ;. it' eF 06 SITE PLAN CHECK LIST --- Lot drawn to scale Survey data (distances and lot size) --- Contours (existing and finished). --- Existing vegetation and natural features. t� --- Proposed landscaping (number, variety and size) equal or greater than the required amount in section 19.104 of the Zoning Regulations. --- Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings. --- Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. --- Zoning boundaries --- Number and location of parking spaces. (RV parking for multi- family projects over 25 units). --- Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. --- Location of septic tanks (if applicable). --- Location of any easements. --- Lot coverage information: Building, overall and front yard. --- Location of site (Street # and lot #). --- North arrow -- Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. --- Exterior lighting details (must be downcasting and shielded). - Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). --- Existing and proposed sidewalks (public). --- Sewer calculation --- Height of new construction. --- Setbacks (residential district, planned r.o.w., Interstate). --- C.O. Zone --- Bike racks --- Traffic generation --- PUD/PCD standarads --- Airport Approach Cone --- Outside storage/display --- F.A.R. I Rfm o IITI MPf2k- GOMMOhI NbMpi I„b•Tll.l I.idMY l/lIZFi pla 'II�/M p�j2lhilNKl$ '\/II.Y.f" MINOR ''/Z/ pb'jb p 12�OG, Iz�- ItJ"-A41 ba.8 Mw t=IoWE♦ZIJ�GH"14� MAuun 2yrl.ATA 2"-2yi", a�ebts p.NNUAL P- ?k PT 7;IuuftP-&Il .7 AP, A-oTRIPN PIWE I-INU4 W160FIA h Mbl " �WWUNI.G}Sab/F�iE MPI.t1y P.,Iata, V eWO(6-A" fV,&*$4* ppNN.4446. ;XISTI11lo h0 {t�21 * I�6aiA Iz6�C Irv/• F�+ �A �i"- ■ 15 30 �i7,* #�°b�t'+M �Jcaoo GClIZI.lU4 3'-�:', b"tb 'I Gip PI" cm- v/1/-��Vep, IV-IW bob 3'1 1W ALjsq-kAA.1 PINeL plNus M11Fs�la. h'-V-1, lb '6 r 1"r- °415p, Ta $e*-- F%4*W ' C:pf &OWW 4 TFtP— PP. T,4*4 jZIGHAW W I L} 4SP / 7Z: - ; MAVZO INDU-TRy,V 41. 4pm►aa1�.L.(eI) L12+St Qflr / I�U'RBF��It'� Lor smG: 7.b �,&k+w P�UIWIQ&: FFHA 0 1 r za,2310 01P. — NPa6 .20 12." r+e, • }��Kh�n-Ifi: py{�..e,r=�: .tl �p/GPIi Iua1.�JCIN(i 2 FiG.hptir.�i V+-(I+�2 '12 �:si. I.ru.u�l�i 3 M.G.�IgGery -tarPL; .III �1'K� INu.ualwa y N��p� 1jul�'�`, PF{eh� 1 r 14.0 %r {�FVoX� It�2 r Q4C0 7r -p71-Pl� 1�i"'e�2 1 � +,+d•2 is t�fi�o8 (�2 � U3.1 9r GovtzP�e: . C'SG t�lU 1 % Gh.b %r pHp�lsf� I e2 + Xr.�l r/o �i�l.�J'ff01-1, IwG, N �gy�17I+'E PION l-,�G�JIT��'1 ---- 4 95wIwW&O-IGWCI1G10- LINE C-aOIpME 4r 4eW.. i w V,lATUP- UN4 vW-1"rrlc_ LJNY &)-I, L W G i <L kA NOV 2 z 1993 City of So. Burlington 1 C �lA.lNO �� It'.I nl GtZL►� LeMrJu rif/ [h1YINl�•MA, I rIG j .. WKI �uDnM41o1J m or pi&/. gtTwep l4!!i = __ r14-W NA0 pl,eri I die T1M� 1-2b-w i +a 1a►isp amm a .1.1. .� No Text STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: Investors Corporation of ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL Vermont and Greentree Park, ) COMMISSION IV Inc. ) APPLICATION #4C0149-8 December 28, 1993 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources, State of Vermont, by and through its attorney, Kurt Janson, Esq., in the above -captioned matter. PRE -HEARING COMMENTS Criterion l(B) - STORMWATER DISCHARGE Randy Bean, Environmental Engineer with the Direct Discharge Section of the Wastewater Management Division, reports that the permittee should submit information to the Section documenting compliance with the existing stormwater discharge permit. Criteria 9(F) and 9(J) - ENERGY CONSERVATION and PUBLIC UTILITIES The Department of Public Service (DPS) participates in the interagency review of Act 250 applications with regard to Environmental Board Criteria 9(F) Energy Conservation and 9(J) Public Utility Services. Criterion 9(F) Energy states: "... the planning and design of the subdivision or development reflect the principles of energy conservation and incorporate the best available technology for efficient use or recovery of energy." The DPS interprets "best available technology " to mean that option which results in either the least energy use or has the lowest life cycle cost. Stuart Slote, Demand -Side Management Specialist with the DPS, has reviewed the application and finds there are some unresolved energy efficiency issues which need to be addressed prior to the issuance of a permit. To assure that the proposed development reflects the best available technology for efficient use, generation, conservation and recovery of energy, the applicant should address the following measures: No Text Application #4C0149-8 Investors Corp. of Vermont and Greentree Park, Inc. December 28, 1993 Page 2 1) List site related considerations proposed to influence energy use, including building orientation, protective vegetation and solar access. 2) Provide calculations and plans for proposed insulation levels in the roofs/ceilings, exterior walls and foundations, and for percent fenestration. Drawing A-3 does not appear to include foundation insulation to R-10. 3) Provide specifications for the energy management system/thermostats, including time -of -day scheduling, holiday scheduling, start/stop optimization, daylighting, multiple temperature setbacks, humidity controls, variable air volume control, variable speed motor control, load shedding, duty cycling and demand limiting. 4) Provide specifications for electric motors including efficiency, power factor and use of variable speed drives. 5) Provide plans and specifications for interior and exterior lighting systems and controls, including lamp type, wattage, ballasts, watts per sq. ft. and pole height. 6) Provide plans and specifications for HVAC systems, including AFUE (annual fuel utilization efficiency), EER (energy efficiency rating), cfm ventilation rate, economiser operation on AC units and use of outside make up air. 7) Provide plans and specifications for heat recovery systems which address ventilation, refrigeration or other potential sources. 8) Provide plans and specifications for hot water heating systems, including E.F. (energy factor) and use of heat reclamation from refrigeration systems, if appropriate. 9) Provide plans and specifications for windows and air lock entries. The DPS requests that the applicant address these outstanding items and submit a response to the DPS for review and approval prior to the issuance of a land use permit. If the applicant does not believe a particular measure is warranted, it may submit information demonstrating that the measure is not applicable, or that an alternative measure is acceptable. Finally, Green Mountain Power Corporation (GMP) and Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. (VGS) have programs to assist customers in evaluating equipment options relative to energy efficiency and load management. The DPS recommends that the applicant contact the two utilities to inquire about the availability of energy efficiency programs. For GMP, the No Text Application #4C0149-8 December 28, 1993 Investors Corp. of Vermont and Greentree Park, Inc. Page 3 applicant should contact David Grimason, Commercial New Construction Program Administrator, at 655-5674; for VGS, the applicant should contact Chris Leister, Workplace New Construction Program Administrator, at 863-4511. All responses should be directed to Stuart Slote, Demand -Side Management Specialist, .- Department of Public Service, State Office Building, Montpelier, Vermont 05620, (802) 828-2393, or from within Vermont at 1-800-642-3281. Dated December 28, 1993, at Waterbury, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources f By: Kurt *So , Esq. Land se ttorney No Text CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Kurt Janson, Land Use Attorney for the Planning Division of the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, sent a copy of the foregoing Entry of Appearance and Pre -hearing Comments, dated December 28, 1993, regarding Application #4C0149-8 (Investors Corp. of Vermont and Greentree Park, Inc.), by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the following: Amy Gregory Investors Corporation of Vermont 126 College Street, Suite 2C Burlington, VT 05401 Greentree Park, Inc. Seven Gregory Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Margaret Picard, City Clerk Chair, Selectboard Chair, Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission P.O. Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Dated at Waterbury, Vermont, this 29th day of December, 1993. Kurt Janson, �sq. Land Use Attorney No Text INVESTORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT ICV Construction, Inc. Managed Forest Resources 40'Merican International Distribution Corporation November 23, 1993 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Joe: Enclosed for signature and comment please find the ACT 250 municipal impact questionnaire in connection with the Lot #1 Greentree Park project currently awaiting planning commission review. Please send the completed form back to me at your earliest convenience. As always, please call if you have questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Amy C . Gre o y r ACG\dml Enclosure D: \IrIL'\P_CT.250 Suite 2C, 126 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 (sot) 863-2311 FAX (802) 863-231; "1 0., •/ w) 11cJ NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND HEARING ACT 250 MINOR APPLICATION #4C0149-8 10 V.S.A., CHAPTER 151 Notice is hereby given that on December 6, 1993, an application was filed by Investors Corporation of Vermont, 126 College Street, Suite 2C, Burlington, Vermont, 05401 and Greentree park, Inc., Gregory Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403, to construct a 38,137 square foot one story office/warehouse building, with 113 parking spaces, serviced by municipal water and sewer. The lot is located in a previously approved 13 lot commercial/industrial subdivision known as Greentree Park, located off of Shunpike Road in South Burlington, Vermont. ``IThe District Environmental Commission will treat this application under Environmental Board Rule 51 -- Minor Applications (amended !ieffective 9/1/184). A proposed permit has been prepared by the Commission and is available at the Commission's office. Findings !�of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless a 1!public hearing is requested. The request shall state in writing ;with specificity why a hearing is required and what additional Eevidence will be presented. !;No hearing will be convened unless, on or before January 4, 1994, a party notifies the Commission or the Commission sets the matter jjfor hearing on its own motion. If a timely hearing request is received, the hearing will be convened on or before January 18, 1994. If you have a disability for which you are going to need accommodation, please notify us by January 4, 1994. Parties entitled to participate are the municipality, the municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission, state agencies, adjoining property owners, and persons granted party status pursuant to Board Rule 14(B). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this la ay of December, 1993. By c' ) 6A Faith Ingulsrud District Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 879-6563 No Text ❑ Districts #1 & #8 RR.#2, Box 2161 Pittsford, VT 05763 (802) 483-6022 ❑ Districts #2 & #3 RR #1, Box 33 N. Springfield, VT 05150 (802) 886-2215 ❑ Districts #4, #6 & #9 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-6563 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: STATE OF VERMONT Environmental Board District Environmental Commission MEMORANDUM All Parties Faith Ingulsrud, District Coordinator December 9, 1993 ❑ District #5 324 North Main Street Barre, VT 05641 (802)479-3621 ❑ District #7 180 Portland Street St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 (802) 748-8787 ❑ Environmental Board Office c/o State Office Building Montpelier, VT 05602 (802) 828-3309 Land Use Permit application #4C0149-8, lot #1 at Greentree Park in South Burlington, Vermont Enclosed for your review is a copy of the proposed land use permit for the above referenced project. As indicated in the Notice of Application and Hearing, this application is being processed as a "Minor" pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 51 (as amended on September 1, 1984) and no hearing will be held unless specifically requested. Any hearing held at the request of a party would only be for the purpose of considering issues raised by the requesting party under the appropriate criteria of Act 250. Because this proposed permit has been prepared based upon consultations with only the Chairman of the District Commission, it is subject to further revision or amendment after review by the full District Commission. The District Commission will not issue a Land Use Permit in this case until the applicant has filed the following: 1. A Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit from the Protection Division of Agency of Natural Resources. 2. A Stormwater Discharge Permit from the Agency of Natural Resources or evidence that a permit is not required. 3. A completed Municipal Impact Questionnaire or letters from the South Burlington Fire, Police and Public Works Departments indicating their ability to serve this project. 4. Cut -sheets showing proposed exterior light fixtures. The 60 day deadline for issuance of a Land Use Permit set forth in 10 V.S.A. 6085(d) shall be deemed waived until such information is filed, unless written objection is filed with the Commission on or before January 4, 1994. If you have any questions regarding this proposed permit or the "Minor" application procedure being used to process this application, do not hesitate to contact me at the District #4 Environmental Office (telephone #879-6563). c� A1. State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT DRAFT AMENDMENT THIS IS A PROPOSED PERMIT: PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS BY JANUARY 4, 1994. CASE NO: 4C0149.8 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 APPLICANT: Investors Corporation (Act 250) of Vermont 126 College Suite 2C Burlington, and Street VT 05401 Greentree Park, Inc. Gregory Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0149-8, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 257, Pages 367, of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Greentree Park Inc., the "Permittees" as "Grantees". This permit specifically authorizes the Permittees to construct a 38,137 square foot one story office/warehouse building, with 113 parking spaces, serviced by municipal water and sewer. The lot is located in a previously approved 13 lot commercial/industrial subdivision known as Greentree Park, located off of Shunpike Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The Permittees, and their assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0149 and amendments are in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained as set forth in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Approved" and on file with the District Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of this Land Use Permit #4C0149-8 Page 2 DRAFT permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit. 4. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittees agree to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. 5. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittees confirms and agrees for itself and all assigns and successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest. 6. The project is approved for the following maximum cumulative impacts: 113 vehicle parking spaces 945 gallons per day of water and wastewater; 326 vehicle trips per day; 48 a.m. peak hour vehicle trips; 49 p.m. peak hour vehicle trips; 150 kilowatts of electricity. 7. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit # issued on by the Regional Engineer, Division of Protection, Agency of Natural Resources. 8. The Permittees shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. 9. The building approved herein is not approved for any manufacturing use or the on -site disposal of any process wastes. The Permittees shall apply and receive approval for any change in the use of the buildings which involves the storage or handling of any regulated substances or the generation of hazardous wastes. Land Use Permit #4C0149-8 Page 3 DRAFT 10. The installation of floor drains is specifically prohibited without prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 11. The Permittees shall apply to the District Environmental Commission for approval for any change in the use of the building or land which would cause noxious or unhealthy emissions into the air or injection of toxic wastes into the soils. 12. The Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest shall install and maintain water conserving plumbing fixtures. The plumbing fixtures shall operate with the following specifications: (1) internal system water pressure of 50 psi maximum, (2) toilets with a maximum of 3.5 gallons per flush, (3) showerheads operating with a maximum of 3 gallons per minute and (4) faucets on sinks and lays shall operate at a maximum of 3 gallons per minute when new fixtures are being installed. An alternative water conservation plan may be presented to the Commission for approval before implementation. The approved alternative shall be implemented and maintained by the Permittees for the duration of the permit. 13. The Permittees shall comply with Exhibits #15 and #17 for erosion control. Hay bale dams and silt fences shall be installed as depicted on the plans prior to commencement of construction. The Permittees shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. From October 1 to April 15 of any calendar year, all disturbed areas of the construction site shall be mulched until final vegetative cover is established. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. 14. In addition to conformance with the requirements of condition #13, the Permittees shall not cause, permit, or allow the discharge of waste materials into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittees from compliance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 15. The Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest shall continually maintain the landscaping as approved in Land Use Permit #4C0149-8 Page 4 DRAFT Exhibit #15 by replacing any dead or diseased plantings as soon as seasonably possible. 16. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those approved in Exhibit # , and shall be mounted no higher than 20 feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 17. Exterior signs shall be limited to those approved of in Exhibits #13 and #15. 18. All heated structures approved herein shall be constructed using insulation with an R-value of at least R-19 in the exterior walls, at least R-38 in the roof or cap and at least R-10 to a depth of four feet below grade around the foundation or slab. The exterior doors shall be insulated and shall attain a minimum R-value of at least R-10. The windows shall be double pane with low-E glazing or storm or shall be triple pane and attain a minimum R-value of at least R-2.75. All exterior doors and windows shall be weatherstripped and all seams sealed and joints sealed to minimize air infiltration. Additional energy conservation measures shall include the installation of oils or LP gas or natural gas heating systems with an Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency (AFUE) of a minimum of 83%; water heating systems shall attain a minimum Energy Factor (E.F.) of .62 (.0019 x rated storage volume in gallons) for gas and .59 for oil. 19. The installation and/or use of electric resistance space heating is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 20. All construction on this project must be completed by October 15, 1997. 21. This permit shall expire on October 15, 2024 unless extended by the District Commission. Notwithstanding the latter date, this permit shall expire two years from date of issuance if substantial construction has not occurred, unless construction is delayed by litigation to secure other permits. 22. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Section 6090(b). Land Use Permit #4C0149-8 Page 5 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 1993. Faith Ingulsrud District Coordinator day of DRAFT By John Collins, Chairperson District #4 Commission Commission members participating in this decision: John C. Drake Thomas D. Visser CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE hereby certify that I, Marsha Cota, Secretary C for the vironmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 MINOR TICE OF APPLICATION AND HEARING #4C0149-8 by U.S. Mail, postage id on this loth day of December, 1993 to the following: jAmy Gregory 1iInvestors Corporation of Vermont �1126 College Street, Suite 2C (Burlington, VT 05401 i �Greentree Park, Inc. IISeven Gregory Drive ,;South Burlington, VT 05403 ,Margaret Picard, City Clerk Chair, Selectboard (!Chair, Planning Commission 'City of South Burlington 1575 Dorset Street !South Burlington, VT 05403 'Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission P. O. Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Kurt Janson, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street, 2 Center Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission John Collins Jack Drake Thomas Durant Visser 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 RD Crawley, District Conservationist Soils Conservation Service 12 Marketplace, Unit 9 Essex Junction, VT 05452 Tom Bushey 41 Pond Road Shelburne, VT 05482 r RTIFICATE OF SERVICE ge #2 - Permit #4C0149-8 IFOR YOUR INFORMATION (Continued) ;William Hall, County Forester Larry Garland, Fish & Wildlife Coordinator Agency of Natural Resources jlll West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 1 Burlington Free Press ;Classified Ad Section 191 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 !Stuart Slote, Energy Engineer Department of Public Service Energy Efficiency Division State Office Building 'Montpelier, VT 05620 David Grimason 'Green Mountain Power Corporation P. O. Box 850 ;.South Burlington, VT 05402-0850 Scott Albertson Vermont Gas Systems P. O. Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS W. W. Grainger, 140 Shunpike Road, South Burlington 05403 John Desmond, Greentree Park, Inc., Powerline Communication, Seven Greentree Drive, South Burlington 05403 - Carol Srebnick, Real Estate Department, Digital Equipment Corporation, 111 Powder Mill Road, Maynard, MA 01754-1499 - Richard Willis, 120 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington 05403 Dated at Essex Junction, VT this loth day of December, 1993. By 4C0149-8/#2 Marsha Cota CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone ;:)Greentree Park. Inc., c/o Ken Desmond, Powerline Communications, Gregory Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 653-6445 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone # ) _Investors Corporation of Vermont, 126 College Street, Burlington, VT 05401 363-2311 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone T ) kay C. Gregory/Skip Williams ICV, 126'College Street, Burlington, VT 05401 863-2311 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Gregory Drive & Shunpike Road 5) LOT NUMBER ( i f applicable) Lot #1 , Greentree Park 6) PROPOSED USE (S) office/warehouse 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, t units, maximum height and � floors, square feet per floor) total size= 38,137 ft. to be constructioned in 2 phases, 20,000 ft. each. One story, 20 ft. maximum height 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 15 phase one, 60-65 phase two Total 80 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 25 %; landscaped areas 37 building, parking, outside storage 63 % 400K (Phase 1) 3000 (Phase 1) 10 ) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 300K (Ph 2) , Landscaping $ 6000 (Phase 2) Other Site Improvements (please list with Bost) $ 11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 1994 (Phase 1 ),.June 1995 (Phase 2) 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 485. Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon ; 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 406 (P.M. Peak) = 70 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 3:30 A.M. to . 5:00 P.M. 14 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday cm DATE OF SUBMIS ION G. TU E OF APPLICANT 1-0- IL DATE OF HEARING NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND HEARING ACT 250 MINOR APPLICATION #4C0149-8 10 V.S.A., CHAPTER 151 Notice is hereby given that on December 6, 1993, an application was filed by Investors Corporation of Vermont, 126 College Street, Suite 2C, Burlington, Vermont, 05401 and Greentree park, Inc., Gregory Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403, to construct a 38,137 square foot one story office/warehouse building, with 113 parking spaces, serviced by municipal water and sewer. The lot is located in a previously approved 13 lot commercial/industrial subdivision known as Greentree Park, located off of Shunpike Road in South Burlington, Vermont. IThe District Environmental Commission will treat this application !under Environmental Board Rule 51 -- Minor Applications (amended !effective 9/1/'84). A proposed permit has been prepared by the (Commission and is available at the Commission's office. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless a !public hearing is requested. The request shall state in writing !with specificity why a hearing is required and what additional evidence will be presented. )No hearing will be convened unless, on or before January 4, 1994, !a party notifies the Commission or the Commission sets the matter !for hearing on its own motion. If a timely hearing request is :received, the hearing will be convened on or before January 18, 1994. 'If you have a disability for which you are going to need accommodation, please notify us by January 4, 1994. Parties entitled to participate are the municipality, the 'municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission, state agencies, adjoining property owners, and persons granted party status pursuant to Board Rule 14(B). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this IDLay of December, 1993. By v Faith Ingulsrud District Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 879-6563 ❑ Districts #1 & #8 RR'#2, Box 2161 Pittsford, VT 05763 (802) 483-6022 ❑ Districts #2 & #3 RR #1, Box 33 N. Springfield, VT 05150 (802) 886-2215 ❑ Districts #4, #6 & #9 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-6563 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: STATE OF VERMONT Environmental Board District Environmental Commission MEMORANDUM All Parties Faith Ingulsrud District Coordinator December 9, 1993 ❑ District #5 324 North Main Street Barre, VT 05641 (802) 479-3621 ❑ District 07 180 Portland Street St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 (802) 748-8787 ❑ Environmental Board Office c/o State Office Building Montpelier, VT 05602 (802) 828-3309 Land Use Permit application #4C0149-8, lot #1 at Greentree Park in South Burlington, Vermont Enclosed for your review is a copy of the proposed land use permit for the above referenced project. As indicated in the Notice of Application and Hearing, this application is being processed as a "Minor" pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 51 (as amended on September 1, 1984) and no hearing will be held unless specifically requested. Any hearing held at the request of a party would only be for the purpose of considering issues raised by the requesting party under the appropriate criteria of Act 250. Because this proposed permit has been prepared based upon consultations with only the Chairman of the District Commission, it is subject to further revision or amendment after review by the full District Commission. The District Commission will not issue a Land Use Permit in this case until the applicant has filed the following: 1. A Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit from the Protection Division of Agency of Natural Resources. 2. A Stormwater Discharge Permit from the Agency of Natural Resources or evidence that a permit is not required. 3. A completed Municipal Impact Questionnaire or letters from the South Burlington Fire, Police and Public Works Departments indicating their ability to serve this project. 4. Cut -sheets showing proposed exterior light fixtures. The 60 day deadline for issuance of a Land Use Permit set forth in 10 V.S.A. 6085(d) shall be deemed waived until such information is filed, unless written objection is filed with the Commission on or before January 4, 1994. If you have any questions regarding this proposed permit or the "Minor" application procedure being used to process this application, do not hesitate to contact me at the District #4 Environmental Office (telephone #879-6563). i State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT DRAFT AMENDMENT THIS IS A PROPOSED PERMIT: PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS BY JANUARY 4, 1994. CASE NO: 4C0149.8 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 APPLICANT: Investors Corporation (Act 250) of Vermont 126 College Suite 2C Burlington, and Street VT 05401 Greentree Park, Inc. Gregory Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0149-8, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 257, Pages 367, of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Greentree Park Inc., the "Permittees" as "Grantees". This permit specifically authorizes the Permittees to construct a 38,137 square foot one story office/warehouse building, with 113 parking spaces, serviced by municipal water and sewer. The lot is located in a previously approved 13 lot commercial/industrial subdivision known as Greentree Park, located off of Shunpike Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The Permittees, and their assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0149 and amendments are in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained as set forth in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Approved" and on file with the District Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of this Land Use Permit #4C0149-8 Page 2 DRAFT permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit. 4. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittees agree to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. 5. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittees confirms and agrees for itself and all assigns and successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest. 6. The project is approved for the following maximum cumulative impacts: 113 vehicle parking spaces 945 gallons per day of water and wastewater; 326 vehicle trips per day; 48 a.m. peak hour vehicle trips; 49 p.m. peak hour vehicle trips; 150 kilowatts of electricity. 7. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit # issued on by the Regional Engineer, Division of Protection, Agency of Natural Resources. 8. The Permittees shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. 9. The building approved herein is not approved for any manufacturing use or the on -site disposal of any process wastes. The Permittees shall apply and receive approval for any change in the use of the buildings which involves the storage or handling of any regulated substances or the generation of hazardous wastes. Land Use Permit #4C0149-8 Page 3 DRAFT 10. The installation of floor drains is specifically prohibited without prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 11. The Permittees shall apply to the District Environmental Commission for approval for any change in the use of the building or land which would cause noxious or unhealthy emissions into the air or injection of toxic wastes into the soils. 12. The Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest shall install and maintain water conserving plumbing fixtures. The plumbing fixtures shall operate with the following specifications: (1) internal system water pressure of 50 psi maximum, (2) toilets with a maximum of 3.5 gallons per flush, (3) showerheads operating with a maximum of 3 gallons per minute and (4) faucets on sinks and lays shall operate at a maximum of 3 gallons per minute when new fixtures are being installed. An alternative water conservation plan may be presented to the Commission for approval before implementation. The approved alternative shall be implemented and maintained by the Permittees for the duration of the permit. 13. The Permittees shall comply with Exhibits #15 and #17 for erosion control. Hay bale dams and silt fences shall be installed as depicted on the plans prior to commencement of construction. The Permittees shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. From October 1 to April 15 of any calendar year, all disturbed areas of the construction site shall be mulched until final vegetative cover is established. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. 14. In addition to conformance with the requirements of condition #13, the Permittees shall not cause, permit, or allow the discharge of waste materials into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittees from compliance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 15. The Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest shall continually maintain the landscaping as approved in Land Use Permit #4C0149-8 Page 4 DRAFT Exhibit #15 by replacing any dead or diseased plantings as soon as seasonably possible. 16. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those approved in Exhibit # , and shall be mounted no higher than 20 feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 17. Exterior signs shall be limited to those approved of in Exhibits #13 and #15. 18. All heated structures approved herein shall be constructed using insulation with an R-value of at least R-19 in the exterior walls, at least R-38 in the roof or cap and at least R-10 to a depth of four feet below grade around the foundation or slab. The exterior doors shall be insulated and shall attain a minimum R-value of at least R-10. The windows shall be double pane with low-E glazing or storm or shall be triple pane and attain a minimum R-value of at least R-2.75. All exterior doors and windows shall be weatherstripped and all seams sealed and joints sealed to minimize air infiltration. Additional energy conservation measures shall include the installation of oils or LP gas or natural gas heating systems with an Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency (AFUE) of a minimum of 83%; water heating systems shall attain a minimum Energy Factor (E.F.) of .62 (.0019 x rated storage volume in gallons) for gas and .59 for oil. 19. The installation and/or use of electric resistance space heating is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 20. All construction on this project must be completed by October 15, 1997. 21. This permit shall expire on October 15, 2024 unless extended by the District Commission. Notwithstanding the latter date, this permit shall expire two years from date of issuance if substantial construction has not occurred, unless construction is delayed by litigation to secure other permits. 22. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Section 6090(b). Land Use Permit #4C0149-8 Page 5 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 1993. By Faith Ingulsrud District Coordinator day of DRAFT John Collins, Chairperson District #4 Commission Commission members participating in this decision: John C. Drake Thomas D. Visser CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Marsha Cota, Secretary C for the Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 MINOR NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND HEARING #4C0149-8 by U.S. Mail, postage paid on this 10th day of December, 1993 to the following: jAmy Gregory Investors Corporation of Vermont 1126 College Street, Suite 2C jBurlington, VT 05401 IlGreentree Park, Inc. ISeven Gregory Drive '!South Burlington, VT 05403 ,'Margaret Picard, City Clerk 'Chair, Selectboard 'Chair, Planning Commission City of South Burlington !1575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission P. O. Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Kurt Janson, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street, 2 Center Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission John Collins Jack Drake Thomas Durant Visser 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 RD Crawley, District Conservationist Soils Conservation Service 12 Marketplace, Unit 9 Essex Junction, VT 05452 Tom Bushey 41 Pond Road Shelburne, VT 05482 TIFICATE OF SERVICE e #2 - Permit #4C0149-8 IFOR YOUR INFORMATION (Continued) ;William Hall, County Forester Larry Garland, Fish & Wildlife Coordinator Agency of Natural Resources 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Burlington Free Press jClassified Ad Section 191 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Stuart Slote, Energy Engineer 'Department of Public Service Energy Efficiency Division State Office Building !Montpelier, VT 05620 (David Grimason !Green Mountain Power Corporation !P. O. Box 850 iSouth Burlington, VT 05402-0850 Scott Albertson Vermont Gas Systems P. O. Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS - W. W. Grainger, 140 Shunpike Road, South Burlington 05403 - John Desmond, Greentree Park, Inc., Powerline Communication, Seven Greentree Drive, South Burlington 05403 - Carol Srebnick, Real Estate Department, Digital Equipment Corporation, 111 Powder Mill Road, Maynard, MA 01754-1499 - Richard Willis, 120 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington 05403 Dated at Essex Junction, VT this 10th day of December, 1993. By .�-. 4C0149-8/#2 Marsha Cota City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 18, 1992 Amy Gregory ICV Construction 126 College Street, Suite 2C Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Warehouse/Office Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the August 11, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please let me know. A�ncerely, Q�/ J Wew C ty Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp IIVVES71ORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT ICV Construction, Inc. Investors Corporation of Vermont/Connecticut October 28, 1992 Joe Weith, City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Joe: Please withdraw ICV's application for development of the Greentree Park site at this time. We will notify you when we are ready to proceed with a revised design. Thank you. Sincerely, V- I Amy C. Gr ory fo ACG\dml Suite 2C, 126 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802)863-2311 FAX (802) 863-2313 No Text PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 October 26, 1992 Amy C. Gregory ICV Construction, Inc. 126 College Street, Suite 2C Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Warehouse/Office Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Planning Commission meeting minutes of September 29, 1992. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i erely, xx l oe Weith, ity Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 0 October 5, 1992 Amy C. Gregory ICV Construction, Inc. 126 College Street, Suite 2C Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Warehouse/Office Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S;'vncerely, e Weith, ity Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp 5 8/25/92 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I.C.V. I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Investors Corporation of Vermont for construction of a 37,500 square foot building in two (2) phases (Phase I - 25,000 square feet; Phase II - 12,500 square feet) for warehousing and related office use as depicted on a plan entitled, "l Green Tree Park, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Robert Ste. Marie, Architect and dated 6/8/92, stamped received 8/18/92, with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $15,075, 3-year landscaping bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit for Phase I. The applicant shall post an additional $7,425, 3-year landscaping bond prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for Phase II. The landscaping plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning permit to show the following: a) An additional $4,805 in required landscaping, b) Existing street trees along Gregory Drive. c) A note indicating the type and quantity of plantings along the northerly boundary. d) The plan shall show 9 proposed Pin Oak as referenced in landscape schedule. The revised landscape plan shall be approved by the City Planner. 2. The applicant shall contribute $2,684/$9,654 for Phase I and $1,320/$5,173 for Phase II to the Williston Road Improvement Fund (Impact Area 2) prior to permit for each phase. 3. A revised plan shall be submitted for approval prior to permit showing exterior lighting. All lighting shall be downcasting and shielded and shall not cast light beyond the property line. 4. A sewer allocation of 720 gpd is granted for Phase I and 360 gpd is granted for Phase II. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee prior to permit for each phase. 5. Revised legal documents for the relocated hydrant easement shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The legal documents shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. 6. This approval is conditioned on a maximum of 30,000 square feet (80%) of office space within the warehouse building (Phase I - 20,000 square feet; Phase II - 10,000 square feet). Any increase in office space square footage shall require Planning Commission approval. 7. The site plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to show the following: a) location of relocated fire hydrant easement closer to the entrance drive, b) an additional fire hydrant in a location approved by the Fire Chief, c) 152 parking spaces, 101 spaces for Phase I and 51 spaces for Phase II, d) the existing snow storage easement along the sidewalk side of Shunpike Road, and e) the outlet structure for the proposed retention pond connected to the existing storm pipe in Shunpike Road. 8. The zoning/building permit for Phase I shall be obtained within 6 months and the zoning/building permit for Phase II shall be obtained within 2 years or this approval is null and void. 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 4 658-7958 September 25, 1992 Amy C. Gregory ICV Construction, Inc. 126 College Street, Suite 2C Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Warehouse/Office Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 29, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i erely, "i-e oe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp Memorandum -Planning September 29, 1992 agenda items September 25, 1992 Page 8 --- to determine sewer allocation, provide number of employees in supermarket, department store, small retail shops and bank. 6) ICV, GREEN TREE PARK This application was continued from the 8/25/92 meeting because the applicant failed to show to represent their request. Enclosed is the staff memo for that earlier meeting (dated 8/21/92). Issues still to be resolved include parking, landscaping, lighting, fire hydrants and a snow storage easement. Staff attempted to contact the applicant numerous times since the 8/25/92 meeting to find out whether they intended to pursue the application. The applicant still has not returned any phone calls or responded to any letters. I can only assume at this point that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the application, therefore, a draft denial motion is enclosed. 7) DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICT Enclosed is a proposed amendment to establish a design control district ---(Option #2c). The second paragraph is section 19.17 was revised to exempt signs from design approval. At last weeks meeting, Steve Stitzel recommended that for projects undergoing both site plan and design plan approval, the Planning Commission should issue separate approvals for each application. Therefore, it is probably not necessary to include Section 19.172(c). Also enclosed is the report on establishing a design control district. This report is required by 24 V.S.A., Section 4407(g). The Planning Commission must approve this report along with the proposed amendment. DA w rJ City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 26, 1992 Ms. Amy C. Gregory ICV Construction, Inc. 126 College Street, Suite 2C Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Warehouse/Office Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting of 8/25/92 decided to continue review of the above referenced application to the 9/29/92 meeting. Review of this application was continued because no one representing your application attended the 8/25/92 meeting. Please be sure someone attends the 9/29/92 meeting to represent your application. The Planning Commission will not grant another continuance. If you wish to withdraw your application, please submit a letter stating such to this office as soon as possible. Please contact me if you have any questions. erely, be Weith, ity Planner JW/mcp O PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 Ms. Amy C. Gregory ICV Construction, Inc. 126 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 I September 14, 1992 Re: Warehouse/Office Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the August 15,1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cere y, e Weith, ity Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp Memorandum - Planning August 11, 1992 agenda items August 7, 1992 Page 4 6) ICV OFFICE/WAREHOUSE - 21 GREGORY DRIVE -SITE PLAN This project consists of constructing a 37,500 square foot one (1) story building for warehouse and related office use in two (2) phases. Phase I is 25,000 square feet (20,000 square feet warehouse and 5,000 square feet office) and Phase II is 12,500 square feet (10,000 square feet warehouse and 2,500 square feet office). The Planning Commission reviewed a site plan for a 64,800 square foot office building on this same lot on 1/23/90 (minutes enclosed). The application was subsequently withdrawn. This property located at 23 Gregory Drive (lot #1, Green Tree Park) is within the IC District. It is bounded on the north by light manufacturing (Resolution, Inc.), on the east by Gregory Drive, and on the south and west by Shunpike Road. Access/circulation: Access is proposed to be via a 30 foot curb cut on Gregory Drive. This curb cut is not opposite the W.W. Grainger curb cut but staff supports its location which is as far from the Gregory Drive/Shunpike Road intersection as possible. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 24.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 68.3% (maximum allowed is 70%). These percentages represent the total for both phases. Front yard coverage along Gregory Drive is 12.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Traffic: Based on I.T.E. code 150 "Warehousing", the project will generate 27.75 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant must contribute $4004 to the Williston Road Improvements Fund (Area 2) based on the 27.75 trip ends. Lighting: Exterior lighting will consist of four (4) 250 watt metal halide lamps with sharp cutoff luminaires mounted on 14 foot poles. The plan indicates that the poles will be 16 feet ?J-µ1 high. There will be building mounted wallpack low sodium lighting at 40 foot intervals. All lighting shall be downcasting if and shielded. 4 Memorandum - Planning August 11, 1992 agenda items August 7, 1992 Page 5 a Landscaping: The landscaping requirement for the entire project is $22,500. Phase I landscaping requirement is $15,075 and for Phase II it is $7,425. The plan submitted shows a total of $3,925 for both phases which is $18,575 short. The plan does` show $3,595 worth of plantings which was required to be planted as a condition of approval for the Green Tree Park subdivision.! This landscaping can not be counted towards the applicant's x landscaping requirement. Landscaping for each phase should be shown on the plan. This site could benefit from more landscaping than what is proposed. The existing street trees along Gregory Drive are not shown in their current location. Approval extension: Pursuant to Section 20.302 of the zoning regulations, the applicant is requesting a two (2) year approval for Phase II of this multi -phase project instead of the normal'`" six (6) month period. Phase I will still be subject to the six (6) month requirement. r Sewer: Sewer allocation for Phase I is 720 gpd and for Phase II it is 360 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee at the time the zoning/building permit is issued for each phase. Parking: This entire project requires a total of 62 parking spaces (41 spaces for Phase I and 21 spaces for Phase II). The plan shows a total of 136 spaces including five (5) handicapped spaces. Parking stall dimensions and aisle widths meet minimum requirements. Other: --- a dumpster is proposed but is not shown on the site plan,, --- there is a water and sewer line easement along the northerl property line which is not shown. --- the Fire Chief has recommended a fire hydrant at the; southeast corner of the parking lot which is not shown. --- the plan should show the existing sidewalk. --- the plan should show the storm drainage easement at the, southeast corner of the property. r (J /tv I" 5 .s.4.w.. s...�..... �:.�:.r.ar.«,._........ ... ...._<..�..�..:._-.... �._ _:.._�...._........__.......... ...._u.._.Y:....:.,.....a._.. �.......rr�.....ii.�... �.....:.:._.................,..:..,,�..��a..x.�....`...:...�....w.,a... �.!, _ >_a.: __' .._. . f PLANNING COMMISSION 25 AUGUST 1992 PAGE 4 Franklin's traffic projections haven't materialized and they are doing less business than last year. The only point of traffic conflict is around the bank with people going to the electronic teller. With regard to the Davis Co. not wanting anything permanent until they have a proposal before the Commission, Mr. Carroll said Ben Franklin would be willing to wait until there is a good overall plan. Mr. Tiballi said he would prefer that improvements stay temporary until the Chittenden Bank issue is resolved. Mr. Burgess stressed that it is not the Commission's intention to predicate any action on potential development of the back of the lot. Mr. Heilman, attorney for Tom Farrell, said they would also ask for a delay to permanent improvements for about 2 weeks while they try to come up with a plan for a new commercial venture that may result in solving the whole problem. Jim Lamphere is working on a proposal that could accomplish this. He also raised a question as to whether Tom Farrell would allow any "permanent" improvements. Mr. Carroll noted they have an agreement with Tom Farrell and have a right to add the improvements required by the Planning Commission. Members agreed to have Ben Franklin put the improvements in on 1 October unless they are otherwise notified by the Planning Com- mission. Mr. Austin moved that FEP Associates commence construction on this plan on 1 October 1992 unless otherwise notified by the Planning Commission. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Continue site plan application of Investors Corporation of Vermont for construction of a 37,500 sq. ft. building in two phases for warehousing and related office use, lot #1, Green Tree Industrial Park, Gregory Drive: The applicant was not present. Mr. Weith reminded the Commission that the applicant had been told to reduce their parking. Mr. Sheahan noted the applicant had asked to be scheduled for this meeting. Members agreed to continue the application for one more meeting. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the application of Investors Corporation of Vermont until 29 September 1992. Mr. Austin seconded. Motion passed 6-1, Mr. Craig opposing. PLANNING COMMISSION 25 AUGUST 1992 PAGE 5 As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:55 pm. Clerk __ l - - ----- --- (�, �(yb,G�----(v �1� f-� �� 2�l �Z i � City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 21, 1992 Amy C. Gregory ICV Construction, Inc. 126 College Street, Suite 2C Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Warehouse/Office Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 25, 1992 to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, /4711- � �/�' Joe Weith; ,Q 6 City Planner Encls JW/mcp No Text No Text r M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: August 25, 1992 agenda items Date: August 21, 1992 3) GREEN TREE PARK, LOT NO. 1 1. The retention basin discharge structure plan shall be submitted for review and approval. 2. There exists a 5 foot snow storage easement along the southerly property line, this should be shown on the plans. There should not be any planting within this easement. 4) L&M PARK, MULTI -FAMILY REVISIONS Plans were reviewed and found to be acceptable. 6) CHITTENDEN BANK, FACTORY OUTLET CENTER, SHELBURNE ROAD, ALTERNATES I & II 1. Sidewalk shall be at least 5 feet in width. 2. Curbing shall be concrete. 3. The two car parking area will be very difficult to enter and exit. Why not combine these spaces with large lot by moving drive westerly. 4. Sidewalk should extend across the easterly island. 5. Islands should include some plantings. r INVESTORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT ICV Construction, Inc. Investors Corporation of Vermont/Connecticut August 14, 1992 Mr. Joe Weith City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Warehouse/Office Building 21 Gregory Drive Dear Mr. Weith: Enclosed is a revised site layout for our 21 Gregory Drive, facility. Our designer has revised the landscaping to what we feel complies with city design standards and we have verified all site designs as discussed at the planning commission meeting. Per our telephone conversation our office has decided to base our office use at 80% in lieu of 20% giving us the required parking to cover any possible tenant. We understand this will result in a increased trip ends and will require a larger impact fee. But because this facility may change upon tenant use, we feel this is necessary to cover its usage. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Respectfully, C (� V.-P � A. Skip Williams ICV Construction ASW\dl Suite 2C, 126 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 863-2311 FAX (802) 863-2313 No Text _�/| ^ �� �l __. /J ---- '------ -----'' ' M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission y From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: August 11, 1992 Preliminary Comments Date: July 16, 1992 SHERWIN WILLIAMS BUILDING, PROCTOR AVENUE, SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan with latest revision dated July 13, 1992 is acceptable. GREEN TREE PARK, I.C.V. LOT SHUNPIKE ROAD (CORNER) There exists a snow storage easement along the sidewalk side of Shunpike Road. This easement should be shown. Plantings within this easement should be avoided. VILLAGE OF DORSET PARK, DORSET STREET (BRAND FARM) Plan with revision in numbers of units along the north side is acceptable. voV idu r .5ud u� 1 10 z 10' H'YDR�NT, n (p `r O EASEMENT / O / 49 1.85 Ac. S 33055�,27"W ti / `��S o O � 15.96 F �� z 3.71 A c. � \ RICHARD WILLIS Q�9 Vol, 175 P. 160 \ \ / ` �� I - \ 65o W O� �6&.9)8 F / 1.79 O (o 10' POWER 8 TELEPH( ti \ / 0) EASEMENT ° / O of `D \ ` W Q) — 30' SEWER 9 WATER / l • 2Cb / 3.56 A C. EASEMENT O of 10' r 10' HYDRANT O %' Op \ EASEMENT OVv i \ ? 2B`39 ry (o \ 66009 09 EC3 16 STORM DRA/NEASEMENT 2 s p3,. 8 J / 2.74 A c. N 230 50' 51 W t S sg°�3/ DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION S/„ �\ Vol. 130 P. 96 E IJ City of South Burlington 575 DORSE T STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 7, 1992 Amy C. Gregory Investors Corporation of Vermont 126 College Street, Suite 2C Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Warehouse/Office Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 11, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Siln c e r e 1 , i J Weith, C y Planner Encls JW/mcp 36 AUSTRIAN PINE 6 CRABAPPLES i 50 RED STEMMED DOGWOOD ---'" PLANTING SCHEDULE QUANTITY COK40N NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE CONDITION 52 MARSHALL'S SEEDLESS ASH Fraxinus pennsylvania lanceolata 2" - 2 1/2" B & B Y 36 AUSTRIAN PINE Pinus nigra 5' - 6' B & B 76 6 SIBERIAN CRABAPPLE Malus baccata 2" - 2 1/2" B & B 11Zf 125 RUGOSA ROSE Rosa rugosa 24" - 30" B & B �f 95 RED STEM DOGWOOD Cornus alba 3' - 4' B &.B 29 TATARIAN HONEYSUCKLE Lonicera tatarica zabeli 3' - 4 B & B� ( f�, INVESTORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT ICV C.Onst)-imipn, Inc lr1y,•<,t,�rc it if f if �1i, f111)111 CA rin oicut .i t,,......__. -- Raymond J. Belair Williston Zoning and Planning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 August 3, 1992 BY FAX: 658-4748 RE: 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ray: In response to your concerns about Icv's site plan application for 21 Gregory Drive, please note the following: 1. office use in the project will be 5000 square feet for Phase 1, and 2500 feet for Phase 2. Warehouse use will be 20,000 feet in Phase 1, and 10,000 feet in Phase 2. 2, The project contemplates 25 warehouse employees, and 2 or 3 company vehicles. 3. The applicant contemplates the completion of both phases within one year. If this does not occur, the applicant will construct Phase 1, with 25,000 feet (20,000 warehouse and 5,000 office, with 97 parking spaces and a $15,000.00 landscaping budget) within one year, and Phase 2 within two years. 4. Exterior lighting will be 250 watt, sharp cut off metal halite mounted on 14 foot poles, 5. The dumpster will be located in the rear of the building, and will be screened with shrubbery or fencing as appropriate. 6. The total landscaping budget will be approximately $20,000. The applicant is relying on the covenants of Green Tree Park to provide some additional landscaping at the site. 7. To comply with the fire department's concerns, the hydrant will be located as required. 8, The snow storage easement will be shown on the final plan for approval presented at the Planning Commission meeting. I hope the above addresses your concerns. Please contact me should you have any further questions. Amy C . Gregory F1' ( d. Suite ?C, 126 Co 1te�, : Street (jUPf111};k?n� tnotlt Oti';OI i;Rt)? j i6� 2.511 F:�t t hug i ~W 21313 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 16, 1992 Amy Gregory Investors Corporation of Vermont 126 College Street Burlington, Vermont Re: Warehouse/Office Building, 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ms. Gregory: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please submit requested information and/or revised plans no later than Friday, July 31, 1992. Sincer ly, Raymo d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RBJ/mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files PA From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: .Preliminary Comments - August 11, 1992 agenda items ' Date: July 10, 1992 ICV OFFICE/WAREHOUSE - 21 GREGORY DRIVE --- provide breakdown of square footage of office use and warehouse use. --- for the warehouse use, provide number of non -office employees and the number of company vehicles operating from the premises. --- site plan approval is valid for six (6) months with a six (6) month extension approval by the Planning Commission. If the applicant feels that phase 2 will not be constructed within one (1) year of approval, he should apply for a multi -phase project under Section 20.302 of the zoning regulations. The applicant should indicate the length of time being requested and provide the above information for both phases in addition to all other aspects of the project including costs, parking, landscaping, etc. --- indicate wattage and type of exterior lights. --- if the site will have a dumpster, it should be shown and screened. --- landscaping is $14,980 short of the requirement. VILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - REVISED FINAL PLAT --- note #5 indicates that this proposal involves 18 buildings designated by shading, staff counts 22 shaded buildings. --- buildings are numbered 1 through 30 but there are only 28 buildings on the plan. --- a revised landscaping plan should be submitted. --- the currently approved multi -family buildings along the north property line have a 15-17 foot side yard setback, the proposed buildings will reduce this setback to only 10 feet and the new SEQ zoning requires a 20 foot side yard setback for multi -family buildings. Since this project is a PUD, the applicant may request a modification to the side yard setback requirement. ��vuii{ {Uurlingtvn ,dire 19cpartntimt 575 471Qrset i�yfrcd math +�ttrlinufatt, l�ermnttf II54II3 :�►.�" ::� FAX: (802) 658-4748 (802) 658-7960 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY AUGUST 11,1992 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: WEDNESDAY JULY 15,1992 1. 2. Sherwin/William Building 310 Shelburne Road Plan has been reviewed by this department and at this time I do not see a problem for our department in given proper protection if needed. The Village At Dorset Park Project #91073 At this time I do not see a problem the changes being made would effect us in given emergency protection. 3. 1-GREEN TREE PARK I.C.V. CORP. PROJECT # 92601 The only problem which needs to be corrected for emergency protection is due to the size of the building 1-hydrant must be installed at the location marked on the plan by this office. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Greentree Park, Tnc Ken Desmond, Powerline Communications, Greentree Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 658-6445 2) APPLICANT (name,, address, phone #) Investors Corporation of Vermont, age Street; Burlington, VT 05401 863-2311 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) Amy Gregcry. iCV, 126 College Street, Burlington, VT 05401 ph: 863-2311 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Gregory Drive' / Shunpi !(e Road 5) LOT NUMBER ( i f applicable) Lot # 1, Greentree Park 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Commercial: mixed warehousing / office 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and 4 floors, square feet per floor) one story, to be construction in two chases. Phase 1 = 25.000feet. Phase 2 -:1-- 12.500 feet 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 24.6 %; landscaped areas 31.7 % building, parking, outside storage68.3 % _Total of both Phases) 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 1.5.M , Landscaping $15,291. Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 1993. 12 ) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ( in and out) 242 total /day Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-6 p.m. 40 5-6 p.m. ; 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING 8 A.M. to 5 P.M. Monday through. Friday SIGN'ATU E OF APPLICANT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Greentree Par_.k, Inc Ken Desmond, Powerline Communications, Greentree Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 658-6445 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) Investors Corporation of Vermont, 1pfi—College Street; Burlington, VT 05401 863-2311 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) Amy Gregory. ICV, 126 College Street, Burlington, VT 05401 ph: 863-2311 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Gregory Drive / Shunpike Road 5) LOT NUMBER ( i f applicable) Lot # 1 Greentree Park 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Commercial: mixed warehousing / office 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors,_ square feet per floor) one story, to be construction in two phases. Phase 1 = 25,000feet. Phase 2 -*- 12,500 feet 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 7 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 24.6 %; landscaped areas 31.7 % building, parking., outside storage68.3 %(Total of both Phases) 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 1.5.M Landscaping $15,291. Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 199.3 12 ) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ( in and out) 242 total /day Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-6 p.m. 40 5-6 p.m. ; 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8 A.M. to 5 P.M. 14 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through. Friday r L DATE OF SUBMISSION TG'14ATUR4 OF APPLICANT DATE OF HEARING �ILLHI� 1, l0 f �G L:i-4t-I GMlV ' Nd1d �1Nu.Nd'Id--9— t q-V4Osm %gd tid }1oIq 1N�Agnq sJNY1 -aFJM r� —Ci- Q2 atll l-*Al`rtA M— :•7N1'Jb�efgs�r4 ilr 3ri1-�F7VsiilP+la't�rl�l --- Ik�rd�rvl,U.l-tlln•�bdd�1—�j-- uol8wlm8 'oS do Apo Z661 s t r,nr (13AID31f, ' VoN f, N ,7NI't o11(1 z� Iry L'I� m a� i �a a� L•�j� � t �udt+e xa-7ttd,j, %e 4o ^ t apt -ta1o� ; �'Xdy%JN � �-IIdY}'YJNI �xr��ty�til ��>•�H �i olNbtYY�nl ll� � LL �L �'dM'� %iiNl�hrMe1 =1'a ri ' �. � L • f �J�vH�f =e-O a.W vli = t �r4 si td : �iricY1111�a 1in�M3cMM / 'JIB :3 rl (IDr1919t+3WW67 7 -lTr of Nl 6WIw : 0f 10L dzio�,7 1N?vvdlfvl -ItLiiie t*"y �d �radd -JVXL t#V%e W'� ez* Ivaed aL e1AbdiIClnl; 2�Y� ' �}�-:� �v .3'rd hnnzlaJ V+=iltecJ3c4 f'G�izl y2 �#u'pQ^c-,t�G d�ml y�o� a� dtid9rt�! . 'zip oc1 �d#SI'nt/iL'iili 1�Q'io7 '�Nd'I'Nn3d5r+N�ws�v�fAY-�r�a�frr�-r�zhrV+ t'daiN Q, 9$4� 'Al�'.I �iI'1'IdW 3'F�f�#�J91+I�Mo'F� j 19W o) q'p4'ieJ',�l d>dallry 4YtNId arvld 1'ldl�ar'n� r 'el`d G d�9�'VL'uUil II?tF�Anh�Grtd i12 �,gtis�If 14 4 :ta-4 -writifl`% — — ri4�4 VlLVk" (Q eiIMyM - -IA �?421-2N14rztomgI--i �#sd � �i�-��cdi �'IINQddll'I �'3dl�i ^d�ellclO anrowMcwa I -IC/ O2 •oon21^u�,Zi, z1oMIlN d�l/� �nIf�1M+� Wn. aooi �21UJ �W�vrl nll'9"I �WbN j"IOI�'lt'•IG+� -�1e}IW I AN I SNOISIA7tl I � ¥�> �. � � w: \\) �� � y� � , «. � \. �` � �� ? ` � � � \ � � k PLANNING COMMISSION 23 JANUARY 1990 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 23 January 1990, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present William Burgess, Acting Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Catherine Peacock, John Belter, Ann Pugh, William Craig, David Austin Also Present Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Qther Paper; Amy Gregory, Paul Ferland, Ray Kaigle, John Concannon, James Lamphere, Carl Cobb, T. & C. Hart, Bill Wessel, William Mikell, Ethan A. Allen, Jr., Nile Duppstadt, Doreen Kendall, J. & V. Fraser, Ted Winfield, J. & M. Lowe, Bob & Becky Watson, Bonnie Finnegan, Michael Schaal, Paul Costello, Diane Wessel, Staige Davis 1. Other Business a) Mr. Weith reminded members of the joint meeting on Monday 1/29, with the City Council and Southeast Quadrant Committee to hear the T.i.Boyle report 2. Review Minutes of 9 January 1990 It was noted that on page 5 the word "lift" should be "life". It was also noted that the designation "normal to plumb"` - should read "perpendicular to plumb". Mrs. Maher moved that the MInutes of 9 January be approved as amended. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Site plan application of I.C.V. for construction of a 64,800 sq. ft. building for office use, lot #1, Green Tree Park, Shunpike Road Mr. Ferland said this is the first lot across from Digital. It was noted that the Commission is trying to get away from compact car spaces and Mr. Ferland said they have no problem reducing the building somewhat and doing away with compact spaces. The building would have to be reduced by about 3,000 sq. ft., but the coverage would stay the same. Mr. Weith noted that if Gregory Dr. is considered the front yard, setbacks are met. Mr. Ferland said the access will be directly opposite Grainger. The building is placed at an angle because they thought the right-of-way was elsewhere and they will realign it if the Commissiion wants. Mr. Craig raised the question of whether the 70o front yard green space PLANNING COMMISSION 23 JANUARY 1990 PAGE 2 is met if Gregory Dr. is considered the building front. Mrs. Msaher felt it more aesthetically pleasing to have the green space on the corner. Mr. Berland noted that meeting the 700 requirement would cost a row of parking. Mr. Weith advised that waiving the 70o front yard green space required a variance. Mr.Weith also noted that the City Engineer has asked for a retention basin in the s.w. corner which will require green space. Mr. Craig asked if the building is sprinklered. Mr. Ferland said it is. Mr. Craig said the siamese connection must also be shown. Ms. Pugh asked whether the Commission can look at the traffic impact on Kennedy Dr/Kimball Ave. Mr. Weith thought this would be helpful. He noted the applicant will contribute to the improvement fund for Kennedy/Williston Rd. Mr. Weith said a traffic study can be required. He thought Act 250 had put a cap on traffic for the entire development and will check where development is now in relation to that cap. He will also check to see if a traffic study was done at sub- division time. With regard to landscaping, Mr. Weith recommended a berm along Gregory Dr. and Shunpike Rd. He would like it to go all the way to the corner with possible staggered elevations. Mr. Ferland said the building will be 35 ft. high. Mr. Craig asked for all contours, preconstruction grade, etc. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the hearing on the application with the understanding that it will be rescheduled within 60 days . Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimouslv. 4. Sketch plan application of William Wessell for construction of a 50-unit planned residential development on a 48.7 acre parcel on Van Sicklen Road. Mr.Austin stepped down during this discussion due to a pos- sible conflict of interest. Mr. Wessell located the property which he owns. He said it is primarily open, gently sloping from west to east. It is crossed by Muddy Brook. The Wessell's own home is on the lot. Noting that the Wessels want to combine 2 non-contiguous parcels to achieve a minimum 50 acre lot, Mrs. Maher asked how this can be done. Mr. Weith noted this can be done if the Commission feels there can be a gain in open space be- No Text ICV CONSTRUCTION INCH Suite 2C, 126 College Street BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 863-2311 TO L.o ATTENTION RE: JOB NO. WE ARE SENDING YOU ttached ❑ Under separate cover via _the following items: ❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order p COPIES DATE NO. DESC TI N to i _ 9ECO' AUG 4 7 i y city of THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted L-For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT240-2 Ees Inc., GO,, Mass. 01471_ If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us' at once. No Text INVE5M CORPORATION OF VERMONT ICV CutlstructiUn, Inc. Imvc too Corpurjdt)n ul'Vermont/Coniieaicut August 5, 1992 By Fax: 658-4748 Raymond J. Belair South Burlington Zoning and Planning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 21 Gregory Drive Dear Ray: In response to your concerns about ICV's site plan application for 21 Gregory Drive, please note the following: 1. Office use in the project will be 5000 square feet for Phase 1, and 2500 feet for Phase 2. Warehouse use will be 20,000 feet in Phase 1, and 10,000 feet in Phase 2. 2. The project contemplates a maximum of 40 warehouse employees, 32 office employees and up to 5 company vehicles. However, it is likely that the actual number of employees will be fewer, depending on the tenant. Phase 1 will encompass 67% of these figures. 3. The applicant contemplates the completion of both phases within one year. If this does not occur, the applicant will construct Phase 1, with 25,000 feet (20,000 warehouse and 5,000 office, with 97 parking spaces and a $15,000.00 landscaping budget) within one year, and Phase 2 (12,500 feet) within two years. 4. Exterior lighting will be 250 watt, sharp cut off metal halite mounted on 14 foot poles in the parking area. There will be building mounted wallpack exterior low sodium lighting at 40 foot intervals of sidewalk condition. 5. The dumpster will be located in the rear of the building, and will be screened with shrubbery or fencing as appropriate. 6. The total landscaping budget will be approximately $20,000. The applicant is relying on the covenants of Green Tree Park to provide some additional landscaping at the site. SUitc 2(:, 126 0)[lege street BurlingtU11, Ve.n110,it 05'4'01 (802)863 2311 mX (W2)'863-2313 Raymond J. Belair August 5, 1992 Page 2 7. To comply with the fire department's concerns, the hydrant will be located as required. B. The snow storage easement will be shown on the final plan for approval presented at the Planning Commission meeting. I hope the above addresses your concerns. Please note that although ICV may not require as much parking and sewer as requested, we seek approval for the maximum amounts in the event the project use changes to a more intensive use. Please contact me should you have any further questions. Sincerely, Amy C. Gr yo y ACG\dl No Text INVESTORS CORPORATION OF VERMONT ICAO CO11SU'Ud011, II1C. A AIK1l;ccl Forest RCSuurrr.S nlcric.tn 1!1tCro',tttootll DistrihUtiOm Corporation December 3, 1993 Faith Ingulfrud, District Coordinator District 4 Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Dear Faith: Enclosed in connection with ICV's application for the amendment to ACT 250 permit #4CO149 for the construction of a 38,137 square foot office/warehouse on Lot #1, Greentree Park, South Burlington, Please find the following: 1. Six (6) copies of the ACT 250 amendment application. 2. Five (5) sets of project plans. 3. Check in the amount of $ 3,038.75 payable to the State of Vermont. Please note the application addresses criteria 1 (Air), 1 (B), 4, 7 (fire services), 8 and 9 (F) as required by #4C)149-1. I appreciate your assistance in this matter, and please contact me at 863-2311 if you have any questions. Sincere Amy C . NGr ACG\dml Enclosure D:\ICV\DISTRICT.250 cc: Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission South Burlington Board of Selectmen South Burlington Planning Commission Suite ?C, 110 Collcgr titrcet liurlin,�um. �'c'rmiiri( (h iOI JANUARY 1992 • APPLICATION FORMS FOR ACT 250 (10 V_S_A., C11P. 151) For detailed instructions, contact the District Coordinator for an instruction booklet. 3/89 : 250APPL.DOC .......................... ( .................. ACT 250 file number dace received LAND USE PERMIT .[ ] complete [ ] incomplete init. APPLICATION .date completed 10 VSA, CHP. 151 coordinator or clerk signature: ................OFFICE USE ONLY.................. NAMES: PROJECT NAME: Lot #1 Greentree Park, Gregory Drive South Burlington 1. Applicant(s) name Investors Corporation of Vermont Address 126 College Street, Suite 2C, Burlington, VT 05401 Phone 863-2311 Legal form: [ ] individual [ ] partnership (attach list of partners) [x] corporation: date formed 1973 place formed Vermont date reg. in Vt. 1973 4 [ ] municipal gov't [ ] state gov't Legal interest in land: [ ] ownership in fee simple [ ] lease agreement [ ] contract to purchase [ ] other: 2. Landowner(s) name Greentree Park, Inc. Address Gregory Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone 3. Contact person Address Investors Burlington PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Amy Gregory Corporation of Vermont, Col e Street, Suite 2C Phone 36 -2311 4. Type: [ ] new project [ ] expansion of project previously exempt from Act 250 [x] amendment of existing Act 250 project (permit # 4CO149-1 ) [ ] permit condition modification (permit # ) 5. General description (include number and size of buildings; use of buildings; number of lots; length of roads; etc.): Construction of a 38,137 square foot office/warehouse on previously permitted lot in the Greentree Park czubrliviriQn r. 6. Construction duration Fntyr (1I) 3r-n-G Duration of Permit Request In ypnrg 7. Total acres owned or controlled by applicant and landowner at project site ;_; Acres in additional easements or rights -of -way Ig Acres committed to this project '1_; Location: town So„th Rl,rlinbtnn road Grp'nr�z Drive route number Nearby landmark Digital Rquinment Distance from landmark 1/4 mil e Direction from landmark nortt, 8. Deed(s): grantee's name as recorded Greentree Park, Inc. recorded: book(s) 257 page(s) 367 date(s) 1.28-83 town South Burlington county Chittenden 3/89 : 250APPL.DOC C OTHER INFORMATION: 9. Are you concurrently applying for a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit, a Subdivision Permit, or any other permit from the Protection Division of the Agency of Natural Resources? [ v]' yes [ ] no 10. Have you received local zoning and/or subdivision approval? [ ] yes [a' pending [ ] none needed 11. Attach the following unless waived by the District Coordinator: [� location map (U.S. Geological Survey map preferred) [✓]' site plan or plot plan (see instructions) [ ] building floor plan(s) (excluding single family homes) building elevation drawings (excluding single family homes) [✓r schedule A - fee information [vr schedule B - Act 250 information (see instructions). schedule C - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit information (if concurrent application) [ ] schedule D - Subdivision Permit information (if concurrent application) [ �]' schedule E.- adjoiner information [� schedule F - certification of service [ ] supporting documents as recommended in Schedule B or as needed [ ] Act 250 fee (payable "State of Vermont") ( ] Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal or Subdivision application fee (payable "State of Vermont") (if concurrent.application) SIGNATURES: 12. I hereby swear that the :information provided above or attached to this application is true and accurate to the b knowledge. Signature of applicant(s) date Z z 13. I hereby certify that I understand that I must not commence construction, demolition, remodeling or commercial use of the property as described in Environmental Board Rule 2(C) until I have received an Act 250 Land Use Permit as required by 10 VSA Sec. 6083(a). Signature of applicant(s) date 12i Z �q 14. I hereby authorize the processing of this applic tion the above project on land(s) that I own, control, significant opert interest in. (attach letter if easier) Signature of landowne date—) Z DISTRIBUTION: 15. SUBMIT THE ORIGINAL AND FIVE COPIES TO THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR. 16. SUBMIT TWO ADDITIONAL COPIES TO THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR IF YOU ARE ALSO APPLYING FOR PERMITS FROM THE PROTECTION DIVISION. 17. SUBMIT ADDITIONAL COPIES TO THE MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION, REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION, AND TO ANY ADJOINING MUNICIPALITIES AND PLANNING COMMISSIONS. ' SCHEDULE A Fee Information ACT 250 Submit with the application a check payable to the "State of Vermont". Municipal and state agency projects are exempt. Not -for -profits are not exempt. Calculate the fee using the following table: 1) Number of lots to be created n x $50.00 = $ 2) Gravel Pits: $.10/cubic yard of the estimated annual extraction rate SUBDIVISION PERMIT/WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT Submit with the application a check payable to the "State of Vermont" if you are concurrently applying for a Subdivision Permit or Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit from the Protection Division of the Department of Environmental_ Conservation, Agency of Natural Resources. Calculate the fee from the following table: Subdivisions: Public Buildings, Campgrounds, Mobile $150 per lot Home Parks: (waste water flows)* $ 50 per deferred lot $.36 per gallon of design flow with a $100 minimum Fee attached $ 340.00 * contact the Regional Engineer for the Protection Division if uncertain I attest by my signature that the above ip true to the best of my knowledge: cw� �f (signature of a licant or agent) 8/93 (a)SCHEDA.DOC SCHEDULE E Adjo:iner Information Submit with the application a list of all adjoining landowners with mailing addresses. An "adjoiner" is a person or organization which owns or controls land or easements on lands which physically abut the tract or tracts of land on which your project is located. Be certain to include landowners on the opposite sides of highways, railways, and rivers (unless you can prove the highway is owned in fee by .the state or municipality). Also include homeowner associations, utility companies, and others with significant legal interest in the,pioject land. It is very helpful if you indicate the location of each, adjoiner on your site plan. If you do not provide a list which is thorough and up-to-date, your application could be delayed because of improper notice distribution! NAME MAILING ADDRESS WITH ZIP CODE W.W. Grainger 140 Shunpike Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 Greentree Park, Inc. C/O John Desmond. Powerline Communication, 7 Greentree Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Attach additional sheets if necessary 3/89 : SCHEDE.DOC ( SCHEDULE F Certification of Service You are required by Section 6084 of 10 V.S.A. to send notice and a copy of your application to the municipality, the municipal and regional planning commission in which the land is located and any adjacent Vemont municipality, municipal or regional planning commission if the land is located on a boundary on or before the date of filing yuor application with the district commission. In order to verify that the statutory parties to the application have received copies of the application and thus avoid delay caused by improper distribution of the application, have a representative of the parties sign this form when they receive the application. You may, in the alternative, send copies of the notice and application by Certified U.S. Mail and list the names below. Applicant(s) Name Investors Corporation of Vermont I, the undersigned, have received a copy of an Act 250 application for the above applicant(s). South Burlington Selectboard, C/O Town Clerk Tor the selectmen, aldermen, or trustees date South Burlington Planning Commission. Tor the municipal planning commission date Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission for the regional planning commission date for an adjacent municipality, if any* date for an adjacent planning commission, if any- date for an adjacent regional planning commission, date if any* I hereby certify that I have forwarded a complete copy of this application to each of the parties entitled to notice pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 6084. icant(s)/Agent Signature IZ 3 -9 z, Date • Attach additional sheets if more than one town is adjacent to the project lands. 3/89 : SCHEDF.DOC ACT 250 N I SCHOOL IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Applicant to Complete: Applicant Name Municipality Number of Lots or Units Estimated Number of Students School Superintendent or Equivalent to Complete: a. What schools under your supervision will provide educational services for families who will live in this project? elementary school middle school high school b. Do these schools have the capacity to accept the additional students listed above? (assume equal grade distribution) Yes or _No? c. If "no", what is the deficiency? d. What plans are in place to correct the problem? e. If plans exist, how could this applicant help achieve those plans beyond adding new homes to the grand list? f. Do you have other comments? I certify the above information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Name Position Date Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? _Yes or No? 3/89 : SCHQUES.DOC ACT 250 MUNICIPAL IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE Applicant to Complete: Applicant Name Investors Corporation of Vermont Municipality South Burlington Title and Date of Site Plan Reviewed # 1 Greentree Park Town Manager, Department Heads, or Equivalent to Complete: a. Does the municipality have the capacity to provide the following services without unreasonable burdens for the above project: Fire Protection? Yels or No? Police Protection? _Yes or No? Rescue Service? _Yes or No? Solid Waste Disposal? _Yes or No? Road Maintenance? Yes or No? b. If "no", what are the deficiencies? c. If the service is unavailable from the municipality, who provides the service so that the town doesn't have to? d. Would the deficiencies occur without this project? _Yes or _No? If "no", what measures can the applicant take to alleviate the deficiencies? e. If the deficiencies are common to many projects, does this project create burdens which are disproportionate to the taxes and user fees to be paid to the municipality? _Yes or _No? If "yes", does the municipality recommend the imposition of an impact fee or other means to mitigate any unreasonable burdens? I certify that the above information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Name Position Date Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? _Yes or _No? 3/89 : MUNQUES.DOC �'f�iS c.� 3 -�of�a�c�e� �� S3�rL►� . on C �- are �.��'�S �tfi2 cpmp J efecC -�'orm —t-o �oC'cJJ�•C�. � 1,D0 . JANUARY 1992 APPLICANT'S YME Inestors Cor oration PROJECT NAME_ 1, Greentree Park Vermont SCfIl nE B Act 250 Information Before the District Environmental Commission can issue a land use permit for any project, it must find that the project meets the ten criteria, and their subcriteria listed in this schedule. Under all of the criteria the applicant must provide enough evidence for the Commission to make the necessary findings. Answers to the questions below, a site plan, and other related documents are usually sufficient for the Commission to make a decision. In larger or more complex cases, additional information may be requested by the Commission or other parties. Provide the information requested in narrative form on separate sheets or in the space provided. If an item does not apply to your project, indicate specifically why it does not apply. If you need assistance in understanding the meaning of any of the criteria, refer to the statute or contact the District Coordinator. Attach any supporting documents at the end of the application and make reference to them in your answers below. If your project is simple in nature with few potential impacts, you may be able to skip over many of the items listed below. The District Coordinator should be able to identify which of the items you may skip over. Read over this schedule and then contact the District Coordinator for assistance. If your project is an amendment to an existing permit, only address those criteria which are affected by the proposed changes. The District Coordinator can assist you in identifying the relevant criteria. If your project primarily involves one of the following, contact the District Coordinator for additional instructions before using Schedule B: [ ] commercial extraction of rock, sand, gravel, or topsoil; [ ] logging above 2,500 feet; [ ] highway construction; [ ] utility line construction; [ ] communication towers; [ ] ski trails, lifts, and related facilities; [ ] construction of lake or pond; [ ] unusual projects; Criterion 1) Air Pollution. Demonstrate that the project will not create undue air pollution: a) If the project involves manufacturing or industrial processes, describe any process air emissions, odors, or sources of noise and measures proposed to control them. Project does not involve manufacturing or industrial processes. b) If buildings will be heated, describe the fuel source and the heating system. Jnrural gas will he used to heat the facility. c) Is an air pollution control permit from the Agency of Natural Resources required for a) or b) above? _Yes or x_No? (Contact the Air Pollution Control Division of the Agency of Natural Resources at 244-8731 if you are uncertain.) If yes, what is the status of your application? � 2 d) Indicate how dust will be controlled during and after construction. Calcium chloride will be applied as necessary. Landscaping and paving will be done after construction is completed. e) Indicate what restrictions will apply to the hours of construction and/or operation and how noise will be controlled, especially in residential areas. Constructibn will generally be between 7:30 A.M. and 5:OC P.M. The city is in a non—residential area_ f) If the project involves any of the following, check them and contact the Air Pollution Control Division of the Agency of Natural.Resources at 244-8731 for further directions: [ ] parking for -more than 1000 vehicles (existing and proposed), [ ] fuel burning equipment with over 10 million BTUs/hour, [ ] coal burning equipment. NIQ g) If the project involves radioactive materials, check here LL ] and contact the District Coordinator for further guidance. N/A Criterion 1A) Headwaters. Demonstrate that the project will meet any applicable health or environmental conservation department regulations regarding any reduction of the quality of ground or surface waters in a headwaters area:. a) Is the project located in'a headwaters area as defined in the statute? (See instructions.) _Yes or X_No? If the answer is yes; be certain to indicate how the project meets the.applicable water quality regulations.under criteria 1B (waste disposal),.lE (streams), -and 4 (soil erosion). Criterion 1B) Waste Disposal. Demonstrate that the project will meet any 'applicable.health or environmental conservation.department regulations regarding the disposal of wastes and demonstrate that the project will not involve the injection of wastes or toxic substances into ground waters: a) Describe any method of sewage disposal to be used and how sewage will be treated and isolated from ground waters.. (Show location of treatment systems and piping on site plan.) The lot is approved for connection to the municipal sewage collection system. b) How.many gallons of.sewage per day will the treatment system be designed and/or approved to handle? WIS gpd? (Contact the regional engineer for the Protection Division in your district for assistance.) c) If an on -site sewage treatment system is to be shared by more than one owner, indicate how it will be maintained and who will be legally and financially' responsible for its eventual replacement? (Attach copy of deed restrictions, etc.) N/A d) If a municipal sewer is to be used, provide the name of the municipal sewage treatment plant and demonstrate that the plant has the capacity to _accommodate your project. (Attach a letter from the municipality.) Airpnrt ParkT.,ay Tin Gtwn tPr treatment & f'arility_ See attarhP�l mnniri�al im��_t- St1t22l1Arit ( 3 e) Is a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit or a Subdivision Permit required from the Protection Division of the Agency of Natural Resources for the sewage disposal system? x Yes or _No? (Contact the Regional Engineer for the Protection st Division or the Dirict Coordinator if in doubt.) IF YES, AND YOU ARE APPLYING FOR THAT PERMIT WITH THIS APPLICATION, BE CERTAIN TO ATTACH SCHEDULE "C" OR "D", THE NECESSARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION LISTED ON THEM, AND THE ADDITIONAL FEE TO THIS APPLICATION AND SUBMIT TWO ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THE APPLICATION PACKAGE. (Contact the Regional Engineer for the Protection Division if you need assistance.) f) Are you relying on a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit or Subdivision Permit to satisfy this criterion? x Yes or _No? IF YES, NO DECISION WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL THAT PERMIT IS OBTAINED AND FORWARDED TO THE COMMISSION. IF NO, AND YOUR PROJECT INVOLVES SEWAGE DISPOSAL, CONTACT THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE ON WHAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO SUBMIT. g) Indicate how stormwater runoff will be disposed of without causing undue water pollution from litter, oil, salt, pesticides, and the like. (Show grass swales, ditches, catch basins, culverts, and other drainage improvements on site plan.) Stormwater is treated in grass swales and detention ponds which limit the peak discharge to 3.3 cfs, within the limits established by the stormwater permit for the park. h) Is a Stormwater Discharge Permit required from the Water Quality Division of the Agency of Natural Resources for the discharge of the stormwater into a stream, river, lake, or municipal storm drain? _Yes or x_No? (Contact the Water Quality Division at 244-5674 if you are uncertain.) If yes, what is the status of your application? i) If the project involves manufacturing or industrial processes, describe what they are, indicate how any wastewater generated will not contaminate ground or surface waters, and indicate whether all necessary discharge permits have been obtained. (Show location of any discharges on site plan). What is the status of your application? The project does not involue manufacturing or industrial processes. j) If storage of oils, fuels, chemicals, cleaning fluids, solvents, batteries, pesticides, or other hazardous materials are associated with this project, indicate what measures will be taken to protect against spills and leaks, especially in a sensitive area such as a municipal watershed or near wells or streams. (Show location of storage on site plan and include details of storage containers, fill pipes, leak detection equipment, containment structures, employee training, etc.) No hazardpus—materialG will hP stored on site. No floor drains are located ip this bUiiding k) Is a permit from or registration with the Hazardous Materials Division of the Agency of Natural Resources required for the storage listed in j)? _Yes or x No? (Contact the Hazardous Materials Division at 244-8702 if you are uncertain.) What is the status of your application? 4 1) Indicate how construction debris, including stumps will be disposed of without creating water pollution. All construction debris will be transferred to a licensed landfill f6r propel disposal. No trees and/or stumps exts Criterion 1C) Water Conservation. Demonstrate that the project will use the best available water conservation technology: a) Would you agree to a permit condition which read: "The permittee and all subsequent owners shall install and maintain only low -flow plumbing fixtures in any buildings, including toilets with flows not to exceed 3.5 gallons per flush, faucets with flows not to exceed 3.0 gallons per minute or which have automatic shut off valves and showerheads with flows not to exceed 3.0 gallons per minute." _Yes or No? If no, indicate why and what water conservation measures will be taken. b) If the project involves significant use of water for manufacturing or other processes, indicate what measures will be taken to conserve water (include recycling, efficient machinery, etc.). Criterion 1D) Floodways. Demonstrate that the project will not endanger the health, safety and welfare of the public or of riparian owners during flooding: a) If any portion of the project is in or adjacent to the 100-year floodway as identified on the National Flood Insurance Maps (on file with your municipality), demonstrate that the project will not involve any filling or construction within the floodway. (Show location of floodway on site plan.) b) If any portion of the project is in or adjacent to the 100-year floodway fringe as identified on the National Flood Insurance Maps, demonstrate that the project will not cause a significant increase in the peak flood levels of the river or stream. (Show location of floodway fringe on site plan.) c) If any fill, structures, storage of materials, or other operations are to be located in the floodway fringe, demonstrate that they will be floodproofed consistent with the National Flood Insurance Program. (Contact the Floodplain Management Section of the Water Quality Division of the Agency of Natural Resources at 244-6951.) r 5 Criterion 1E) Streams. Demonstrate that the project will maintain the natural condition of any streams, when feasible: a) Indicate the name and location of streams, drainageways, or riparian wetlands on or near the project site and the distance to the closest construction disturbance. (Show precise location of streams and construction limits on site plan.) b) If a stream is located within 100 feet of a disturbed area of the project, indicate how the stream and the lands along the stream will be maintained in their natural condition. (Show undisturbed buffers, revegetation plans, erosion controls, isolation distances to any sewage systems, and the like on site plan.) c) If a section of a stream must be crossed, relocated, or modified, demonstrate that there are no reasonable alternatives and then indicate how the crossing or new stream channel will be constructed in a stable and naturalized condition. (Show details of the construction on site plan.) (Contact the District Fisheries Biologist.) Dl Is a Stream Alteration Permit from the Protection Division of the Agency of Natural Resources required for any work in a stream? _Yes or _No? (Contact the Regional Engineer with the Protection Division of the Agency of Natural Resources.) If yes, what is the status of your application? e) If the project involves the withdrawal of water from a stream, river, pond, or lake, check here [ ] and contact the District Coordinator for further guidance. Criterion 1F) Shorelines. Demonstrate that if the project is located along a shoreline, it complies with the four standards relating to the condition of the shoreline listed below: a) Indicate the name and .location of any river, lake, pond, or reservoir on or near the project site and the distance to the closest disturbance. (Show location on site plan.) b) If the project is located on or near a shoreline, then answer i) through iv) below: i) Indicate how the shoreline will be maintained in its natural condition. (Show undisturbed buffers, erosion controls, and the like on site plan.) ii) Indicate how and where any existing public access to the water body can be reasonably maintained. (Show details on site plan.) iii) Indicate how the vegetation will be provided or retained to screen the project from the water body. (Show details on site plan.) iv) Indicate how the shoreline will be stabilized from erosion with vegetation. (Show -details on site plan.) Criterion 1G) Wetlands. Demonstrate that the project will meet applicable Water Resource Board regulations regarding any •impacts on designated significant wetlands: a) Indicate the location of any wetland areas on or near the project site and the distance to the closest disturbance. (Contact the Wetlands Biologist with the Agency of Natural Resources at 244-6951 for assistance in identifying wetland areas.) (Show location on site plan.) b) Indicate how any wetlands and the lands along the wetlands will be maintained consistent with the Water Resource Board regulations, if applicable. (Show undisturbed buffers, erosion controls, isolation distances to any sewage systems, etc. on site plan.) (Contact the Wetlands Biologist for assistance.) c) If the wetland regulations do not apply to any wetlands associated with your project, be certain to address the value of the wetlands under applicable criteria including lE (streams), 1F (shorelines), 4 (soil erosion), 8 (scenic beauty), and 8A (wildlife habitat). Criteria 2 and 3) Water Supply. Demonstrate that the project has sufficient water available for its needs; and that the project will not cause an unreasonable burden on an existing water supply: a) Describe the source(s) of domestic water which will be utilized for the project. (Show location of wells, springs, piping, etc. on site plan.) b) How many gallons of water per day will be needed? gpd? flow was this figure determined? c) Demonstrate that the source listed in a) will be of sufficient quantity to meet the daily needs (include nearby well information, pump test results, letter from municipal or private water company, hydrologic study, etc.) C d) If a domestic water sourer is to be shared by more than one owner, indicate who is Legally responsible for its mai.ntenancci and possible replacement".. (ALLach copy of deed restrictions or other evidence which wi.l.l. ensure continued maintenance.) (1) Is Health Department approval. necessary f.or a shared water syst:rm or extension of a municipal water. line"? _Yes or _No"? (Contact. the Regional Engineer with the Protect: .ion Division or the Health Department at. 863-7220.) if. yes, whaL is the status of your application"? f) Describe the source of above) and demonstrate project.. (Show details any commer.ci.a1. or that: water exists on si.Lr plan.) _ indust:r. ial waLur supply ( i f different. from in sufficLent. yuant.it.y for Lhe needs of the g) Demonstrate that the use of any of the water sources listed in a) or f) above wLL1 not: restrict. the flow of water to ot.her existing users. (Include location and distance Lo nearby wells or springs, nearby well. information, pump LesL resuLt.s, letter from municipal or private wager company, hydrologic study, (!L(:.) h) If there are any community wells nearby (for example, in mobile home parks, condominium projects, high densLty subdivisions, etc.) which might be affected by your project:, contact the ficalth Department at 863-7220 to see whether their review is necessary. If their review is necessary, attach a review litter if available. Criterion 4) Soil Erosion. Demonstrate that the project will not cause unreasonable soil erosion; and will not cause a reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water so that a dangerous situation results: a) Describe the topography of the project site, the proximity of sloping lands to water bodies and property boundaries, and the potential. for soil erosion. (Show contours on site plan in five foot intervals.) (Show precise limits of soil. disturbance on site plan.) The site is virtually flat with very low erosion nnrenrial b) Indicate what erosion control measures will be taken during construction to prevent eroded sediment from reaching a water body or adjoining property. (.Include hay bale dams or silt fences, dail mulching, diversion ditches, sediment basins, etc.) (Show details on site plan.) During construction, drainage will be directed to the detention basin on the site whirb wiii 2,t as a sedimentation basin during the construction period. Tem nrnry proaien eet�lrel measures will be hay halac and stabilized entrance c) Indicate what permanent erosion control measures will be taken after construction to stabilize the site from continued erosion. (Include stone -lined ditches, grassed swales, paving, rip -rap, seeding mixtures, etc.) (Show details on site plan.) in parking lot areas and seederl and Innriscaped in all other areas. ee landscaping plan/site plan d) If exterior site work or earth moving will occur between October 1 and April 15, indicate what special erosion control measures will be taken to stabilize bare soils through the winter months. Site work will be done in summer months. e) How frequently will the erosion controls be inspected during construction and who will be accountable for their maintenance? Erosion controls will be inspected daily. f) Indicate what percentage of the project site will be covered with buildings, roadways, parking areas, or other areas impervious to water. (Show on site plan.) Lot coverage will be 63%. See attached site plan. g) Demonstrate how the increased rate of stormwater runoff from these areas will not not create a dangerous or unhealthy situation for adjoining property owners or downstream areas due to streambank erosion or flooding. (Show drainage swales, culverts, and retention basins on site plan.) Existing catch basin will be expanded to accomodate runoff. See site plan. h) If the project involves the construction of a permanent dam, check here [ ] and contact the District Coordinator for further guidance. Criterion 5) Highways and Other Means of Transportation. Demonstrate that the project will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to the use of highways and other means of transportation: a) Indicate where vehicles will have access to a state or local highway from this project. (Show location on site plan and on site location map.) b) Describe the design of the driveway(s) or road intersection(s) and demonstrate adequate safety (include number of lanes, traffic controls or signals, approach grades, sight distances in each direction along the state or local highway, legal speed limits, etc.). (Show details on site plan.) c) Is a permit required from the Utilities Division of the Agency of Transportation for commercial or residential access onto a state highway? _Yes or _No? (Contact the Utilities Division of the Agency of Transportation at 828-2653 if you are uncertain.) If yes, what is the status of your application? d) Is a permit required from your municipality for access onto a town or city highway? _Yes or _No? (contact the zoning administrator, town manager, or road commissioner). If yes, what is the status of your application? 9 1 e) If a roadway is involved, indicate the length of the road and the maximum gradient. (show road location, profile, and cross sections on site plan unless waived by District Coordinator) N/A f) If a subdivision roadway is involved, is it likely to be turned over to the municipality? Yes or _No? If yes, will the road be built to municipal specifications? _Yes or _No? Is the municipality likely to accept the road? _Yes or _No? (Include letter from the municipality confirming this.) IF YOU ANSWERED NO TO EITHER QUESTION, BE CERTAIN TO ADDRESS CRITERION 9G (PRIVATE UTILITIES). g) Demonstrate that emergency vehicles and trucks will have sufficient access into the project site and can easily turn around. (Show details on site plan.) Emergency services have approved this project. See municipal impact form. h) Demonstrate that adequate parking for peak periods will exist for the project. (Show details on site plan.) SPP SItA elan. An estimated 70 employees are planned, i) Demonstrate that the traffic associated with the project will not create unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions on nearby highways or nearby intersections (include traffic counts during peak hours, measurements of delays in entering intersections, recommendations of traffic engineer, etc.) (Contact the District Coordinator for guidance and to determine if a traffic study is necessary.) Th�er�e are gn 85 trip ends based on ITE standards 150 and 710 of the ITEtifth edition , with the estimated A.M. and P.M. peak hour trips of 70. Both are within limitiT of the overall industrial park allocation. k) If the project involves or may affect a railroad, airport, or other means of transportation not addressed in a) through i) above, check here [ ] and contact the District Coordinator for guidance. Criterion 6) Educational Services. Demonstrate that the project will not cause an unreasonable burden on the ability of local governments to provide educational services: a) If the project is residential or involves the creation of jobs, estimate how many school age children will likely result from the project and how that figure was determined. 0 b) Demonstrate whether the local schools can accommodate the additional students listed under a) without significant hardship (include school impact form attached to application, letter from school district, estimates of student capacity at local schools, location of existing bus routes, etc.). No Text ` to c) Indicate what mitigation measures can be utilized with the project to offset any significant hardships on the local schools indicated above (include impact fees, phasing schedules, etc.) Criterion 7) Municipal Services. Demonstrate that the project will not cause an unreasonable burden on the ability of local governments to provide municipal or governmental services: a) Demonstrate that the local fire department can provide fire protection services without significant hardship (include municipal impact form attached to the appplication, letter from fire department, etc.). See attached municipal impact form which evidences the fire departments approval. b) Is a Public Building Permit for electrical wiring and fire protection required by the Department of Labor and Industry? x Yes or _No? (Contact the regional Labor and Industry office.) If yes, what is the.status of your application? Pending. c) Demonstrate that the local police department, constable, or state police, can provide police services for the project without unreasonable burden (include municipal impact form attached to the application, letter from police department, etc.). See attached municipal impact form for nol;ca npprnunl of this—pr-Qjeet.. d) Demonstrate that sufficient solid waste disposal capacity exists at a local landfill, transfer station, or incinerator to meet the needs of the project (include municipal impact form attached to the application, letter from landfill operator, copy of state landfill certification, etc.) . cat Anieipal ifnpaet iorm. e) Demonstrate that the municipality, or a volunteer organization serving the area, can provide rescue services for the project without significant hardship. (include municipal impact form attached to the application, letter from rescue squad, letter from town, etc.) See municipal impact form. f) Indicate what mitigation measures are proposed with the project to offset any significant hardships on the municipal services indicated above (include impact fees, phasin schedules, etc.). poses no significantmunicipal services as indicated by a a e impact torm. g) Describe any potential impacts to services provided by adjacent municipalities as well as appropriate mitigation measures. P1/q Criterion 8) Scenic Beauty, Historic Sites, and Natural Areas. Demonstrate that the project will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites, or rare or irreplaceable natural areas: a) Describe the visual appearance of the project site and surrounding area as it exists without the project (include open areas, wooded areas, mountains, ridgelines, wetlands, streams or shorelines, existing structures nearby, etc.). (Show existing feat re.s on site plan.) The project consists of a low profile building ;n a industrial subdivision. The site is a flat field with virtually no vPgPrarinn to be a is ur e . surrounding properties are also industrial areas_ b) Demonstrate that the project's visual appearance from a highway, community center, or nearby residences is consistent with the visual appearance of the existing area as described in a) above: i) Demonstrate that the project use (residential, retail, industrial, etc.) is consistent with the existing or planned land uses in the area. Will the project generate any significant noise related impacts during and/or after construction? If so, what mitigation efforts are being proposed. The prole t 1s / e at�d-appearance and will conform eihLl ig in us real c aracter o die area. No significant noise is anticepated ii) Demonstrate that the building size, density, and location are not out of character with the terrain of the site, the size of nearby buildings, surrounding vegetation, and nearby scenic vistas from highways or community centers. (Show details on site plan.) The building is in chararter Ta_,'_th others in the industrial park and neighboring industrial sites_ iii) Demonstrate that the architectural style and building materials and colors are not out of character with the style of area buildings (provide drawings of building). The architectural style of the building ;s ransist-Gnu ;aith others in the a12require wellproportioned structures an su ue exterior tones. co or chip is enclosed. iv) Demonstrate that parking areas are designed to minimize their visibility from the highway or nearby residences. (Show on site plan.) The landscaping plan (attached) will reduce the visibility of Parking areas v) Demonstrate that any project signs are designed to minimize their visual impact on the surrounding area (include size, illumination, and colors). (Show location on site plan.) A building identification sign, will he located e� the eastern side of the lot. A sketch is attached with a re}�resentative color chip. 12 vi) Demonstrate that any exterior lighting is designed to minimize its visual impact on the surrounding area at night, and that it will not glare into the highway or nearby residences (include size, wattage, fixture style, and pole height). (Show location on site plan and include r�anufactu ex' s e ification shee Exterior lighting will be low intensity downshie de� luminaires mounWd go higher than . vii) Demonstrate that any utilities (propane tanks, trash dumpsters, electric distribution lines and poles, etc.) are designed to minimize their visibility from the.highway or nearby residences. All utilities will be located underground. The trash dumpster will be enclosed and iora-fedat the back ot Me i g. viii) Indicate what additional landscaping will be added to the project site to minimize any of the visual impacts discussed above. (Show details on site plan.) A dense barrier of Austrian Pines, seedless ash, crabapple and oak trees wili boraer Me ix) Indicate if any restrictions on tree cutting or earth disturbance will be used to minimize any of the visual impacts discussed above. (Show detais on site plan.) There are no existing trees on site, and landscaping willminimize visual impacts as noted above. c) Will the project have a significant impact on a historic site identified by the Division of Historic Preservation? _Yes or x No? (Contact the Division for Historic Preservation at 828-3226 for guidance.) If yes, what measures will be used to minimize or mitigate the impacts? Please refer to findings in original permit. d) Will the project,have a significant impact on a designated rare or irreplaceable natural or fragile area on or near the project site? (Contact the Vermont Natural Heritage Program at 244-7340 for assistance in identifying natural or fragile areas.) P1/A. Please refer to findings in original permit. Criterion 8A) Wildlife and Endangered Species. Demonstrate that the project will not destroy or significantly imperil necessary wildlife or endangered species habitat: a) Indicate whether any critical wildlife or endangered species habitat exists on or near the project site (include deer wintering areas, bear feeding areas, pristine rivers or streams, wetlands, or the like.) (Contact the District Fish and Wildlife office for assistance in identifying wildlife habitat.) (Contact the Vermont Natural Heritage Program at 244-8711 for assistance in identifying endangered species habitat.) (Show areas on site plan.) N/A 13 b) If critical wildlife habitat exists on or near the project site, indicate how the project will not destroy or imperil that habitat, or indicate what mitigation measures can be taken to minimize the impact (prepare response to the subcriteria of Criterion 8(a)). (Show details on site plan and attach review letter from the Department of Fish and Wildlife). N/A Criterion 9A) Impact of Growth. Will any increase in population associated with the project create an undue financial burden upon the ability of the town or region to accommodate such growth: a) If the project is residential in nature, indicate how many additional people may live in the project, what portion may be seasonal, and what percentage of the total population of the municipality this project represents (include population or housing statistics, etc.). b) Does the municipality have the financial capacity to accommodate this additional population growth or indicate what mitigation measures can be utilized to offset the financial burdens on the municipality (include letter from the municipality, reference answers to criteria 6 and 7, fiscal impact report, etc.)? Criterion 9B) Primary Agricultural Soils. Demonstrate that the project will not significantly reduce the agricultural potential of primary agricultural soils: a) Does the project site contain primary agricultural soils? If so, indicate how many acres. Has the project been designed to minimize the impact on the future agricultural use of the soils. (Contact the District Soil Conservationist with the Natural Resource Conservation District or the Land Use Planner with the Vt. Department of Agriculture at 828-2504 for assistance.) (Show agricultural soils on site plan or attach soil map.) b) If the project cannot avoid significant reduction in the potential of the primary agricultural soils as identified in a) above, then answer i) through iv) below: IN i) Demonstrate that there is no other use of the site which would have less impact on the primary agricultural soils, but would still provide a reasonable rate of return on the fair market value of the project lands taken as a whole, including a scaled down version of the proposed project (include financial analyses of alternative designs of the project and alternative projects which show returns on the fair market value of the land including the investment). 1 14 ii) Demonstrate that there are no other non -primary agricultural soils owned by the applicant or coapplicant which are reasonably suited for this project. iii) Demonstrate that the project has been clustered or otherwise designed to minimize the reduction of primary agricultural soils in order to retain the better soils in larger, farmable units under unified ownership. (If a subdivision is involved, attach deed restrictions which assure common ownership or control of the preserved agricultural soils.) (Contact the Land Use Planner with the Vt. Department of Agriculture at 828-2504 for assistance.) iv) Demonstrate that the project will not significantly interfere with or jeopardize the continued agricultural use of adjoining lands or reduce their agricultural or forestry potential. Criterion 9C) Forest and Secondary Agricultural Soils. Demonstrate that the project will not significantly reduce the potential of secondary agricultural soils or forest soils: a) Indicate whether the project site (acreage owned by applicant or coapplicant) contains of soils which have long term commercial forestry potential as identified by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, or by the state County Forester. (Contact the District Soil Conservationist with your Natural Resource Conservation District or your state County Forester for assistance.) (Show forest soils on site plan.) b) If the project site does contain forest soils, indicate how the project has been designed to minimize the impact on the future forestry use of the soils. c) If the project cannot avoid a significant reduction of the forest soils as identified in a) above, then answer i) through iii) below: i) Demonstrate that there is no other use of the site which would have less impact on the forest soils, but would still provide a reasonable rate of return on the fair market value of the project lands taken as a whole, including a scaled down version of the proposed project (include financial analysis of project and alternative projects which show returns on the fair market value of the land as a whole). 15 ii) Demonstrate that no other non -forest soils owned by the applicant or coapplicant which are reasonably suited for this project. iii) Demonstrate that the project is clustered or otherwise designed to minimize the reduction of forest soils and to retain the better soils in larger, manageable units under unified ownership. (If a subdivision is involved, attach deed restrictions which assure common ownership or control of the retained forest soils.) (Contact your County Forester for assistance in designing projects.) Criteria 9D and 9E) Earth Resources. Demonstrate that the project will not interfere with the future extraction of earth resources; and demonstrate that if the project involves the extraction of earth resources that it will not unduly harm the environment or neighboring land uses, and will be reclaimed for an alternative use: a) Does the project site have a high potential for extraction of mineral or earth resources? _ Yes or _No? (Contact the State Geologist at 244-5164.) b) If yes, then indicate how access to the resource can be maintained in the future. c) If the project involves the extraction of earth resources for commercial sale, or involves extensive use of borrow material from on site or nearby, answer i) through iv) below: (Contact the District Coordinator if you need assistance.) i) Demonstrate that any proposed blasting will not damage nearby water supplies or structures, and will be limited in duration and size so as to not be a continual nuisance for nearby residents (include blasting plan, insurance information, notification process, hydrogeologic reports, etc.). ii) Demonstrate that any trucking of excavated material will not unduly damage area highways, and will be reasonably limited in duration and frequency so as to not be a continual nuisance for nearby residents (include trucking plan, hours of operation, extraction rates, vehicle trips per day, etc.). iii) Describe the reclamation plans for the extraction area and how those plans can be financially assured (include final contours on site plan, landscaping plan, future land uses, bonding plan, escrow contribution schedule, etc.). 16 Criterion 9F) Energy Conservation. Demonstrate that the project reflects the principles of energy conservation'and utilizes the,best available technology for energy efficiency: a) If the project involves commercial, institutional, or industrial buildings, indicate what measures will be used to conserve energy (include details on insulation, windows and doors, heating and venilation, lighting, etc.). (Contact the Public Service Department at 828-2393 or at 1-800-642-3281 assistance.) the project will meet ash RAE standards, with insulation of R-19 in exterior walls, R-38 in the roof, R-10 in the foundation. Windows will be Low E insulatione glass. b) If the project involves commercial, institutional, or industrial buildings, demonstrate that electrical use has been limited to those uses for which no alternative energy source is reasonably suited. Electrical use will be limited to lighting and office/warehouse equipment. c) If the project involves a residential subdivision or condominiums, would you object to a permit condition which read: "The permittee and all subsequent owners shall install and maintain energy conservation measures in any heated structures, including insulation with a R-value of at least R-19 in the exterior walls, at least R-38 in the roof or cap and at least R-10 around the foundation or slab, with double pane glass or storm windows and insulated doors." _Yes or No? If no, indicate why and what energy conservation measures will be required. N/A d) If the project involves a residential subdivision, condominiums or a commercial development, would you agree to a permit condition which read: "The installation of electric resistance space heating equipment in any building is expressly prohibited without prior District Environmental Commission approval"? Yes or _No? If no, indicate why and why more efficient forms of energy cannot be used for space heating. Criterion 9G) Private Utilities. Demonstrate that any 'private utilities (shared by two or more owners) will not become a burden on the municipality if it must assume responsibility for them: a) Indicate whether any of the utilities (road, water system, sewer line, septic system, etc.) will be controlled by more than one owner, and if so, indicate who will be legally and financially responsible for ongoing maintenance and eventual replacement. b) If a private utility will likely be transferred to the municipality, indicate how it will meet municipal specifications. 17 c) If a private utility will not be transferred to the municipality, indicate how the utility will continue to be maintained so as to not become a burden for the municipality at a later date. (Attach copy of deed restrictions or other evidence which will ensure private maintenance and eventual replacement of the utilities.) Criterion 9H) Scattered Development. Demonstrate that if the project is not physically contiguous to an existing settlement, it will not result in greater costs to the municipality than it provides in additional tax revenues and other public benefits: a) Indicate whether the the project site is physically contiguous to an existing settlement (be certain to include site location map). b) If the project is not contiguous to a settlement, demonstrate that the additional tax revenues and other public benefits of the project outweigh the additional costs of providing municipal services to the project (information generated under criteria 5, 6, 7 and 9A.) c) Indicate what mitigation measures can be utilized with the project to offset any excessive costs for the municipality indicated above which are not offset by additional tax revenues or other public benefits (include impact fees, phasing schedules, etc.). Criterion 9J) Public Utilities. Demonstrate that the project will not place an excessive or uneconomic demand on any necessary governmental or public utility facilities or services: a) Indicate what governmental services or public utility services are needed and demonstrate that such services can be provided without undue burdens. b) If the project involves commercial, institutional, or industrial uses, indicate how " electrical use will be minimized during peak periods of energy demand in the service area for the utility (include major sources of energy usage, letter from the utility serving the project, etc.). The estimated utility demand is 150 KVA; The overall park was estimated to use 750 KVA by Green Mountain Power. See cumular;ze impart statement. 18 c) If any utility lines cross the project site other than along the highway, demonstrate that the utility lines will not be significantly affected (include letter from utility company). (Show utility lines on site plan.) NIA Criterion 9K) Public Investments. Demonstrate that the project will not endanger any adjacent public investment: a) If any public facilities or lands are located adjacent to or on the project site, demonstrate that the project will not significantly affect those facilities (include highways, parks, schools, fire stations, sewer lines, etc.). Criterion 9L) Rural Growth Areas. To the extent that the project parcel or any area within the parcel is identified as a "rural growth area," indicate how the project has been clustered or otherwise designed to provide for reasonable population densities and rates of growth to economize on the cost of roads, utilities and land usage. (Contact the District Coordinator if you need assistance.) Criterion 10) Local and Regional Plans. Demonstrate that the project conforms to the municipal plan or regional plan or municipal capital program adopted under 24 V.S.A., Chapter 117: a) Is there a duly adopted town plan? If so, explain how the project conforms to that plan with regard to land use, goals and objectives, and comments from local authorities (include copy of plan's land use map, relevant plan language on appropriate land uses or building densities, letter from the planning commission, etc.). b) Indicate what type of land uses are encouraged or allowed on the project site under the regional development plan if one exists (include copy of plan's land use map, relevant plan language on appropriate land uses or building densities, letter from the regional planning commission, etc.) (Contact your regional planning commission for assistance.) �) Does the municipality have a capital program? If so, indicate how the project conforms to that program. (Note: contact your town planner or planning commission for assistance.) 4/89 19 District Office Use Only Application if EXHIBIT LIST FOR PROJECT DATE NO. ADMITTED BY SUBJECT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22 23. 24. 25 20 1 PAGE 2 EXHIBIT LIST (CONTINUED) PROJECT DATE NO. ADMITTED BY SUBJECT 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. Y". 49. 50. 4/89 SCHEDB.DOC �,IIEDULI C Rev. 8/1/90 AGENCY OF NATLMAL RESOURCES FOR OFFICE USE ONLY lltrtNtil'1L N'1' (-,, I.Ulg6ERVATIuN Permit PERMITS, COMPLIANCE & PROTECTION DIVISION Date Application Received WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL (Schedule "C" to Master Act 250 Land Use Permit Application) THERE IS TO BE NO SITE WORK OR CONSTRUCTION -COMMENCED ON THIS PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES. LANDOWNER: CO -APPLICANT: Name: Ken Desmond, Greentree Park, Inc. Name: Investors Corporation of Vermont Address: C/O powerline eoriimunication. Address: 126 College Street, Suite 2C (Mailing) Gregory Drive, South Burlington, (Mailing) Burlington, VT 05401 WE. UJ403 Tele. No.: 658-6445 Business Name (if dther than above): CONSULTANT: (architect, engineer, plumber) Name: Robert St. Marie Tele. No.: 863-2311 Tele. No. 878-0124 Address: Hickory Hill Williston VT 05495 (mailing)- (Street) (Town) (State) (Zip) A. PROJECT LOCATION: (Attach Map) Town: South Burlington B. When ,was the parcel created? 1937 Road/Highway: Gregory Drive/Shunpike Road C. List any prior Environmental or Act 250 permits issued for A above: 4C0149-1 through 7 D. Describe the project (be specific: see item #1 on back) (Attach 2 sets of plans) A_38_,137 square foot office/warehouse located on the 3.5 acre lot designated as Lot #1, Greentree Park. E. TYPE OF WATER SOURCE: (Municipal, offsite, community, onsite) Munirinal_ (Attach approval - see #6 on back) F. Does this water supply serve 2 or more buildings? Yes G. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: (municipal, offsite, community, onsite) Municipal (if municipal, attach approval - see #5 on back) H. Number of gallons of sewage generated: Existing Flows: 0 New Flows: 945 I. APPLICATION FEE: (36¢ per gallon of design flow of project - minimum fee of $100.00 per application.) Make check payable to STATE ONT. AMOUNT CLOS S 340.00 A SIGNATURE F DATE SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT 0 Rev. 8/1/90 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Permit # PERMITS, COMPLIANCE & PROTECTION DMSION Date Application Received APPLICATION FOR SUBDMSION PERMIT (Pursuant to Section 3-08 of the Environmental Protection Rules) (Schudle "D" of Master Act 250 Land Use Permit Application) LANDOWNER NAME: PHONE: MJ),I LNG ADDRESS: (Town) (State) (zip) CONSULTANT NAME: PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: (Street) (Town) (State) (zip) 1. Location: (Enclose United State Geological Survey Map or Town Highway Map showing subdivision location.) Town: Road: Deed to this property is recorded in Book 2. Description: Number of lots: 3. Purpose: single-family residences other (explain) , Page Size of lots: 4. Type of Water System Proposed: Individual drilled well; onsite offsite Number of lots connected to water supply This water system serves/will serve 2 or more buildings or lots. Connection to municipal system (name municipality and attach a letter authorizing connection to that system). Municipality: Connection to a non -municipal community water system. How many lots are now connected to this system? Who owns it? Dug well or spring: onsite offsite Other (Reservoir/Lake) Name 5. Type of Sewage Disposal System Proposed: Septic tank system; with site modifications? Connection to a non -municipal community disposal system. Owners Name Connection to municipal system (name of municipality and attach a letter authorizing connection to that system). Municipality: Other 6. How much land will the landowner retain adjacent to the subdivision being applied - for? (Do not include land across a public highway from the lot.) If less than 10 acres, is the retained lot improved? Yes No With what structure 7. List anv prior Environmental or Act 250 Permits issued on the same tract of land. List all permit numbers 8 Present use of neighbo4 property (residential, agriculi .1, etc.). Show this information and locations of water supplies and sewage disposal systems on plot plan. a Are any of the lots exempt? Yes No If yes, explain If either proposed lot or retained lot is improved with a primary single-family residence, or a public building with sewage flows less than 300 gallons per day, and was under construction prior to March 5, 1973, the lots may be considered exempt if: a. the structure is served by a public water supply approved by the Department of Health or a private water supply which has been tested and meets the drinking water quality standards in Chapter 8 of the Environmental Protection Rules; and b. the structure is served by a municipal sewage disposal system approved by the Department; or has a functioning on -site sewage disposal system not causing apparent pollution or a health hazard with the disposal field at least 100 feet from any property boundary created by the conveyance. If the sewage disposal system is an outhouse or other system not requiring interior plumbing and conventional subsurface disposal, the 100 feet will be measured from the location where a subsurface disposal system would likely be installed. 10. If the retained or proposed lot meets items 8.a. and 8.b above, you should complete a Homestead Exemption Application. 11. Act 250: Number of lots (of any size) created by applicant/landowner within a five mile radius of this subdivision or within the environmental district within the last five years? Will any roads have to be constructed to give access to or within this subdivision? (If applicant/landowner has created more than 10 lots in response to question number one, or if you answer "yes" to second question, you must obtain a project review sheet regarding Act 250 jurisdiction from the District Coordinator before submitting this application.) APPLICATION FEE: $150. PER LOT Amount Enclosed $ (Make check payable to STATE OF VERMONT) (Signature of Landowner) (Date) THERE IS TO BE NO SITE WORK OR CONSTRUCTION COMMENCED ON THIS PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONSULTAgNT'S STATEMENT REGARDING FLOOD PLAINS (Section 3.08.A.7) (ConsultcAnt must state whether any area of the subdivision lies within a flood plain.) (Signature of Consultant) (Date) I CERTIFY THAT THE PROPOSED DESIGN FOR EACH DISPOSAL SYSTEM COMPLIES WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES_ (Signature of Consultant) (Date) SCHEDULE D Rev. 8/1/90 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PERMITS, COMPLIANCE & PROTECTION DMSION APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PERMIT (Under the authority of 18 V.S.A. Chapter 23 and the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 3) INSTRUCTIONS USE: This application form may be used by landowners proposing to create a subdivision with lots of less than 10 acres each. Responsibility for obtaining the permit rests with the seller not the purchaser of the lots. The Master Act 250 Land Use Permit Application Form should be used for subdivisions that also require an Act 250 permit. OTHER To make certain that you are aware of all permits which may be required, we PERMITS: recommend that you contact the appropriate Regional Office before completing the following application and obtain a Project Review Sheet. WHAT IS Please submit two copies of the application form, site report and NEEDED: attachments to the appropriate regional office of the Agency of Natural Resources. SINGLE For single lot subdivisions only, certified site technicians as well as LOTS: registered professional engineers have been authorized by the Agency to complete the site reports. Lists of these individuals are available'at the regional offices. In towns which contract with the On -Site Sewage Program of the Vermont Association of Conservation Districts, an on -site specialist may also complete this application for a single lot subdivision. Exception: We cannot accept applications by site technicians for subdivisions where the landowner has already sold or received approval for one or more lots within the past 24 month period; also, where site modifications are required to bring a lot into compliance with the standards of the regulations, the technician must have received a Type B certification pursuant to Section 2-05 of the Environmental Protection Rules. RECORDING: All subdivision permits must be recorded in, the town land records within 30; days of receipt (at the permittees' expense) and prior to the conveyance of any lot approved by the permit. REGIONAL OFFICES ESSEX JUNCTION - 111 West Street SPRINGFIELD - RR #1, Box 33 Esser. Junction, VT 05452 No. Springfield, VT 05150 Phone: 879-6563 Phone: 886-2215 ST. JOHNSBURY - 184 Portland Street PITTSFORD - RR #2, Box 2161 St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 Pittsford, VT 05763 Phone: 748-8787 Phone: 483-2166 BARRE - 324 North Main Street Barre, VT 05641 Phone: 479-3621 (See Section 3.08 of the Environmental Protection Rules) A. Site Report: ( ) Complete the enclosed application; ( ) Location of Project - on USGS map or Town Highway Map; ( ) Municipal Approval for (submit letter approving connections for municipality); ( ) water supply ( ) wastewater disposal ( ) Consultant's statement of whether any areas of the subdivision lie within a flood plain. If so, the location of such areas must be clearly designated on . the plot plan. (Section 3.08.A.7) B. Plot Plan: (submit 2 copies) ( } proposed lot layout and dimensions; ( ) existing surface waters and drainage systems; ( ) each lot designated by letter or number; ( ) proposed drainage systems; ( ) location of continuous area or sewage disposal system; ( ) location of water sources and water supply piping; ( ) five foot contours in sewage area; ( ) use of adjacent properties and their water supplies and wastewater disposal systems,. if existing; ( ) location of existing structures and when constructed; ( ) location of all perc-tests, soil borings and test pits done on lot, ( } location of any flood plain. C. Soil Data: (submit 2 copies) ( ) 2 test borings for both the primary and replacement areas on each lot to a minimum depth of seven feet or refusal and description of soils encountered; ( ) 2 percolation tests for each of the primary and replacement disposal systems; ( ) determination of level of highest seasonal groundwater table and basis for determination; ( ) results of all soil borings, test pits and perc tests done on lot; ( ) statement by consultant that the design of the proposed subdivision complies with the Rules (Section 3.08, Chapter 2, and Section 7.07.A). D. Non -Public Water Systems: (See Chapter 8 of the Environmental Protection Rules) ( ) results of pump test on well; ( ) report of chemical and bacteriological testing of water supply; ( % design of water supply system by registered professional engineer; ( )'written agreement with owner of off -lot water supply. E. ( ) All plans and soils report to be dated and signed by the consultant. F. ( ) Application Fee: $150.00 per lot G. ( ) Book and page number of your deed to the property. Application for Amendment to 4CO149 Cumulative impacts for Greentree Park will be as follows (including Lot #1) : ALLOCATED APPROVED UNALLOCATED Parking Spaces 284 695 411 Water & Wastewater 3006 4688 1682 Vehicle Trips 840 1337 497 A.M. Peak Hour 121 272 151 P.M. Peak Hour 129 289 160 KVA Demand 300 750 450 D:\ICV\4CO149 t Cr DR. # CLIENT SCALE This plan and all arrangements shown on it are the sole property 17 c ( f of Design Signs. Any form of reproduction of this plan in whole or in I part is prohibited. This plan is not to be aced for the construction of DATE any design without first obtaining written permission from Design i I `Z l ! p,:� Signs. 7 / r� // E — I N/ Urunu u,, 9p"9 •to e`o'o 1 I LEXINGTON \WAVERLY CIR. HERCULES f . ! CAMP 1/ I / p�g9KFr o u tJE ZA 1 \ A ^ PINECREST4 OA ''•\,, �o '/ 1 JOHNSON Lily Pad\1 I J� �? ,rv' D� O BUTTON OR. •,"I I-KIMBER LY OR. 1 ]Pond I P J P STEARNS AVE.JJ (Vermont Q = IRA ALLEN OR. p $ National Guard) ETHAN ALLEN , .� Q 3'� pAiLwAYNgA ro, on INDUSTRIAL PARK O Champlain Valley Exposition PRO SP MT.STERLING Ok �rj O^,.,•I J ,S!•"��3!. CAMELS HUMP/f\ P /tr IrJ �F�Cgfs A�F, S�1A NE �V a pf{r o•L �' tt• 4,,. ��uxc0 o PAR w'FA / it u ,�{oA s' . MANSFIEL OR, a•yYI� �� MIE�:i��• � i' —� I ��y. � ICHARDS 4n' Fanny / I \�..�'—•� ,% o �* oP o cro�W P�� Ott/ t•S 1 j +_I�O�Jq`D g© n'I/�N.1' UiN ���sS'> �t �'1 "�O��✓Qa Allen St. Michael's / i /� `—f •/-Y,�f �i .`ry°�/5K ,%1,.,;�. I�FO AINST c SSOfrUt<S�aaTPrRs W EE�T¢Yt. a`c .ION tHs\• 1 / r\ fr.�y�' ` '' I f L-�— S. HILL DR. ESSEX \ JUNCTION >s ATHEW 4f Sr OQ EducatiSpal Pooh, f Center °_ 1 ro QBffJ I lslfr ' Rea 1 / A pR 000 AVE. \+f�"�" ST t - , I �e •� � I St. ,���r �G r9qR0 HAN ALLEN OR. J� o / • R. r I t � e r TJ r ry /{ M P°°R � r a Y `,�•, li'0,,. '� �1. .�, sr /a FARM 9 '9 `� QO,S [\ 1 i:.^ /• PKW ' Hosp•rj'/ty APl R A 4/9 R/Vf i� rh OP° A v Unit) 11 t`pN0 0, P° }tl� 1Q BURLINGTON �/' KIflBY RD. INTERNATIONAL? E V ASONDOWN �DR. - - — -AIRPORT F ��, r yt^2 ,g t•e � v GUVAt. ST. \ ouMoxT �' �P\tits OR. 'm ' i� VEA/� '�\ / nAVp o r\�,t.At. • HILLSIDE I� P`cWPPo St• PNOSSQ St' ?'�, �y.�Mit lux° .§ -.•,,� SHARONOD• tt St.: S a\SE' �, PA ELA O'Brien pINE c� Ni etPP Est t ,� LEE ROr.^,,._M�� Civic Center IT oe '� Ot Ya AVE. �t i i O �01 `�� tAlESA St. ^`P�o) HICKORY HILL. RO. EXECUTIIVRE o Poa.% PtA1GK5t. t� PGA H 0 /t-Lr.�\ /Qo ✓ ; I ¢ I�AaJ '•+•�.,, �. � � :;�1'`? qL P1`�' I PINECRE� s DOEINf � pIAPO*�� st. // y�� r \NO° Rossignol e m o Jerry .'L. OE 11 Club University tOAME St. m o o iR�SEPGON St• •V�Q Q' �p yl s a 'leict/yr llE/y 2 Nf = I ; Mall Ett o ° +I — o o �e —I opOOR. SA Mp50N .� aSOpf I K,Mn41 nix, J, —ADP 0, "LAMPL TEILA. S. L I .. Poo,AW m q O UNgtt 1 WAIGIIt (yQ N i o ';I W E00$IOE 9" o ¢ , FOR.�otr��.EECHW00A. `f 'fir,,., 1'•1I W BOS�•�eF' WOObCREST \\ \`�`allop� a .,',�•f'•• OR:,VG�' w�p00 I LL SHUNPIKE R0. F dq Offices: South firP ofice a Burlington i High K-t, ' 3V DepLO School O116 0 " ® T 6 NAVNEs AYE. Digital13 ,' }+ 100 x BARS i BURLINGTON SNIIPt a � � L A Copyright,THE NATIONpAL �+ LRVEY 1986 Chester,Vermd"ii 05143 WALKER Hitt f! � 116 1 I.A n� �._. ... U..Urepho ;1d ` WS.A. no F ..