Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBatch - Supplemental - 1240 Airport ParkwayDecember 14, 1982 Mr. George Brady 1240 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Brady; Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Hoard of Adjustment has granted your request for a multiple use of your property at 1240 Airport Parkway. Your proposal is subject to site plan approval by the Planning Commission, contact the City Planner for scheduling. The Zoning Board will issue formal findings at a later date. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Rw/mcg NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant Name, address of property owner Property location and description I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on , , at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: Appeal of,Y seeking a �'" �`'` �' ' , from Secti Wt of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to es ,✓ F y / R e e e C e# e ° .r' - (.i'+ ,a+t ITS-1..,.I'�7� a`. � [ ✓ �"�'� ^%� --�:� t"-7l'rll rJ' � �Y �...�",...�.-E �? �, .,f�' ..tt,�.1' 7 IlIx %1� Z--. i ✓:'ti r.. eta r. ,� kr . November 29, 1982 Mr. George Brady 1240 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning hearing Dear Mr. Brady: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, December 13, 1982 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this hearing. Very truly, Richard Nard, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg 41, 4" Ir",W oaroot I , shaft lornfiv ZoN Wo a WWdte Streef., No. Z Appeal of 0", vw tfon 9.4 PwM Regiesl It %r permission contolnlr4 owqxrmal -'�Qcres, oroom to dccw fixes for ,residential -a f*uWwl Office use W4 - tion with,'oulsting bL* 4 12'Alrpgrt Parkwow No.,'3, Amw of Er -,,HoedwWsooking a % from Section ll.lSe j uses of " South. -au W ,11 ROW1 �,Vqrmlsslon •to"Coo! 4unc*on With alith- Wes. of Emit's Ma Shelburne Road, , -iN f;, ,I I I �lRid4. z0 ho "nstratjqo No Text I City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 June 17, 1988 George Brady 1240 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Brady Property, 1240 Airport Parkway Dear Mr. Bradey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission. Also enclosed are Bill Szymanski's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 21, 1988 to represent ,your request. JBL/mcp Enc1s Sincerely, J cc v- �. •�� (C L, �,,, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner Cits of sou I'll 13urliIIgtoll 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNEh 658 %y5 July 6, 1988 George Brady 1240 -airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Brady: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 l:'nclosed are the minutes to the Ylannink Commission meeting held June 21, 1988. If' you have any questions reL;ar•d i ng these minutes please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, � ) JA_ oe Wei th, C i t y 1' 1 anner JW/mcp 1 F-nc 1 Memorandum- Planning June 17, 1988 Page 3 Access: Access for all four lots will be -from the new cul-de- sac. Access to the existing house on lot-'-i must be oontinuously maintained during construction of the cul-d'e-sao and units. Pedestrian Access: No sidewalks are shown on the plans. The Commission should discuss whether to require one. Bill Szymanski does not feel one is necessary for this short street. A sidewalk on the south side of the cul-de-sac would be in the conservation zone. If the Commission requires one, it should be provided on the north side of the cul-de-sac in order to minimize construction in and disruption to the conservation zone. Open Space: Fifteen percent of the plat area would result in only 11,250 square feet of required parkland set aside. Since two existing City parks are located within a half mile of the , proposed subdivision and the cost of maintaining an 11,000 foot recreation area would exceed the benefit created, it seems preferable to instead pay the required recreation fee. On the other hand, added green space will enhance the City owned drainageway and provide additional green space to the area that doesn't necessarily need heavy maintenance. (See tax map) Utilities: See Bill Szymanski's comments. Other: The plan should show the names of property owners located across Airport Parkway. Additionally, the plan should show any existing natural features such as wooded areas. ; F t, 5) BRADY PROPERTY DISCUSSION IN PLANNED COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, 1240 AIRPORT PARKWAY Mr. George Brady proposes to construct four industrial buildings on his 5.25 acre property at 1240 Airport Parkway. Zoning: The property is zoned Mixed Industrial and Commercial. The ordinance does not allow planned unit/commercial developments in this district. Section 19.65 of the zoning ordinance lists several exceptions to the one building and one use per lot requirement for this district. The proposed development doesn't meet any of these exceptions. In order to approve development of this type a zoning variance would be required, a zone change or a change to the ordinance to allow PCD's in the I-C zone. Disadvantages: The disadvantages of the proposed development include the following: o The development does not conform to zoning. o The proposed street serving the new buildings does not conform to City standards, which on the other hand would 3 Memorandum - Planning June 17, 1988 Page 4 be required if subdivided. Advantages: The advantages of the proposed developments include: o The clustering of buildings allow for the preservation of the large wooded area along the east side of the property. This provides a nice buffer to the adjacent residential properties. o If the property is subdivided, the owner may not be able to develop as many buildings due to restrictions caused by minimum lot sizes, setbacks, and more land devoted to streets. Recommendations: I recommend that Mr. Brady provide the Planning Commission with a Sketch Plan of how the land could be subdivided to meet the existing zoning if this proposal were denied. This would allow us to compare a potential subdivision plan to this proposed planned commercial development. Project Description: The plan is a pre -sketch plan for discussion purposes. Mr. Brady proposes to construct four Commercial/Industrial buildings. Four buildings exist on the property which the plans show to be approximately 1,240 square feet each. A playground and parking lot also exist on the property. A building would be demolished to make room for a proposed building. A private roadway would be constructed to serve the new buildings. Proposed uses and whether buildings will be single or multiple use has not been determined. (It should be noted that several of the dimensions and square foot measurements indicated on the plan are incorrect.) The Commission should discuss whether PCD's should be allowed and if so, should City Streets be required or streets built to City standards instead of private drivways to serve a commercial development such as this. Other: Please see Bill Szymanski's comments. �n Ca�1�.t� (VL(�' k C_� rt 5 �X Cc V-C Y6 2 t,. l PLANNING COMMISSION 21 JUne 1988 page 3 5. Discussion with George Brady regarding a planned commercial de- velopment on 5.25 acres of Industrial Commercial Land, 1240 Airport Parkway Mrs. Lafleur noted that pcd's are not allowed in this district. If the Commission agrees to the concept, Mr. Brady could go to the Zoning Board for a waiver of the one building per lot requirement. He could also apply to get tie land rezoned. Mr. Brady said his office building is at 1240 Airport Pkwy, the Day Care is at 1235, Lawnmaster is at 1240. The area is wet, heavily treed with a pond, and Mr. Brady said he wants to pre- serve that character as a buffer to homes on Shamrock Rd. The buildings he proposes here would not be seen from the road. Mrs. Lafleur suggested having Mr. Brady prepare a sketch plan if the land were subdivided. She also recommended a site visit. A possible special provision could be added to the Industrial -Com- mercial District for special environmental considerations under which a pcd would be acceptable. Mrs. Maher said she was concerned with safe ingress and egress as the area is very dangerous now and businesses are apt to have large trucks. Mr. Brady said it is possible to turn a tractor trailer around on the lot, so they wouldn't have to back onto the street. Ms. Peacock said she would like a stipulation that the wetland not be later developed. Mr. Burgess and other agreed. The general concensus of the Commission was to amend the zone to allow this kind of trade-off. Ms. Pugh suggested having the Natural Resources Committee look at the site. 6. Discussion with Dean Economou regarding development of +400 acres of land on the east and west sides of Dorset St., south of Swift Gt Dean Zoeckline explained that Mr. Economou wants a high quality development and is looking to hear everyone's concerns. He then outlined the properties involved. He felt this was a chance for the City to do some master planning to work in with the City park. Ms. Maher first raised the question of using a trail system instead of sidewalks. Mr. Burgess agreed this should not happen. Mr. Zoeckline showed one site where they propose a commercial office complex with a possible convenience store. This piece of land would have to be rezoned for this use. r M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: June 21, 1988 agenda items Date: June 17, 1988 2) RIEHLE SUBDIVISION, SPEAR STREET 1. This property is not on the City sewer system. Sewer service exists of the Quarry Road intersection. Allowing on site sewage disposal is not in the best interest of the City. 4) FRANCO SUBDIVISION, AIRPORT PARKWAY 1. Road shall be public maintained by the City. 2. Final plan shall include all utilities including street lights. 3. The cul-de-sac is substandard but serving only three lots it is acceptable. 5) BRADY PLAN,'AIRPORT PARKWAY 1. Entrance drive should be two way. 2. Sewage disposal will have to be on site or pumped to the Airport Parkway plant. 3. Plan should have owner's name and who prepared plan. 6) ECONOMOU FARM DEVELOPMENT, DORSET STREET 1. I think it is a good plan because it limits curb cuts on Dorset Street and on future arterial streets. Also there are no dead end streets or cul-de-sacs. 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: r a. Owner of record s. . /_ IJ2Ad b. Applicant c. Contact person X.- .V r 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). /iV O"vS' 7/L /A / C o •-rXl .r 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) d wf-e- L 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties Poz CCl.-VZ t6i c X h10/1 e A10 /l e 7f' / 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on �roperty such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. DW'f- 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub- division, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. -- w (Si njatu) JI icant or contac'. F_Pr,on - - 1 lee ,Y" A State of Vermont � r x STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAND USE PERMIT CASE NO. PB-4-1136 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT Mr. George Brady Environmental Protection Rules ADDRESS 1240 Airport Parkway Chapter 4 - Public Buildings So. Burlington, VT 05401 Chapter 7 - Sewage Disposal Chapter 8 - Water Supply This project consisting of placement of a building on a 4.5 acres parcel for the Alarmaster Company (maximum 55 gallons per day flows) with municipal water service and on -site sewage disposal which serves this building and part of the Green Mountain Child- care building approved in Land Use Permit PB-4-1093 located at 1238 Airport Parkway in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions: GENERAL 1. The project must be completed as shown on the plans by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc. Drawing No. D-1554 "George Brady Property, Wastewater Disposal Plan" dated January 1986 and which have been stamped APPROVED by the Division of Protection. No alteration of these plans shall be allowed except where written application has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained. 2. The Vermont Department of Health is to be contacted in regard to any regulations and/or licenses required by their department. (They may be reached at 60 Main Street, Burlington, Vermont, or by phoning 802-863-7220.) WATER SUPPLY 3. The project is approved for connection to a municipal type water system approved by the Department of Health provided that all construction is in accordance with the approved plans and the Environmental Protection Rules, Effective September 10, 1982. SEWAGE DISPOSAL 4. The project is approved for the existing subsurface wastewater disposal system. No buildings, roads, water lines, or other construction that might interfere with the installation or operation of the sewage disposal field is permitted on or near the continuous area. All isolation distances as set forth in Chapter 7, of the Environmental Protection Rules. If at any time this system fails to function properly and/or creates a health hazard, the Division of Protection is to be immediately notified. 5. This permit shall in no way relieve you of the obligations of Title 10, Chapter 48, Subchapter 4, for the protection of groundwater. I Land Use Permit PB-4-1136 Page Two PLUMBING 6. No alterations to the existing building which would change or affect the interior waste plumbing, water supply, or wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Environmental Conservation. Dated this 28th day of February, 1986 in the Village of Essex Junction, Vermont. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION / / l Mary 1K. Clark Assistant Regional Engineer Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer cc: Donald Robisky Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry City Planning Commission ✓ Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. Michael Andronaco James Dodge Hazel Gordon SRS Daycare 1/4/83 1 DHS MOTION OF APPROVAL For the Site Plan Application by George Brady for office and/or residential use as depicted on a plan entitled "Proposed New Buildings, 1240 Airport Parkway, prepared by George Brady, dated November 1982. Stipulations: 1) There shall be only one driveway serving the property. The location shall be approved by the City Planner. 2) Sufficient shrubbery and earth at the west end of the property and on the adjacent airport property shall be removed so that site distance to the west of the driveway shall be at least 275 feet. 3) Parking adjacent to Airport Parkway shall be eliminated and the area shall be seeded. 4) A storm drainage plan and septic system information shall be sub- mitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a build- ing permit. 5) The proposed fence shall be extended across the entire front of the rear buildings and storage area. 6) A bond for landscaping and for site work related to sight -distance improvements shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 7) A revised site plan - containing required information from stipulations 1 and 5 - shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a building permit. 8) This approval expires in 6 months. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 4. 1983 4. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. Mr. Poger asked what would happen if the documents in #3 were not submitted and Mr. Spitz said the subdivision would be invalid. Mr. Poger noted that the motion did not refer to opening the road between the two areas, which is now closed, but Mr. Spitz said that unless the Commission took action to close the road, it would stand unchanged, which is open. He noted that the road had been closed in violation and that the city had decided not to take any action, pending this Commission action, but that road is to remain open. Mr. Poger noted that the Commission did not take lightly its responsibility for listening to and following the dictates of the residents of the city when they are consistent with the best planning of the city as a whole. He said they did not lightly ignore resident petitions. On the other hand, they do not lightly ignore the history of what the Commission laid out here in the past and the reasons for it. The motion carried with 6 yes votes and an abstention, from Mrs. Hurd. Mr. Case felt the petition had been ignored, but Mr. Poger felt that the Commission had listened to the concerns of the residents and had made a hard choice. Site P1anapplication by George Brady for erection of two buildings for office and/or residential use at 1240 Airport Parkway Mr. Spitz said the Zoning Board had approved this plan for office uses, with the ability to have up to 2 residential units, if necessary. Mr. Brady expects he will not have to have the two residential units. There are industrial units to the rear of the property and there will be a fence between the areas. Mr. Spitz noted that sight distance in this area was not too good. Mr. Brady has permission from the airport to do some grading on airport land to improve visibility. It is about 130' from his proposed entrance to the airport boundary. Mr. Brady said that in the future he would like to add a building beyond the proposed parking lot at the end of the proposed new entrance. Mr. Poger was concerned that another building might be added between the new entrance proposed and the airport boundary line, which could block visibility. He did not think that would be good. Mr. Woolery was concerned about traffic eventually having access to Shamrock Road, but was told that is zoned residential, so it is unlikely. Mr. Brady had shown two accesses to the land. The City Manager/Engineer and City Planner both recommend only one. Mr. Brady said there was a problem with ledge on the property and he noted that to allow a truck enough room to get onto the side, he would have to have such a large radius that it would cut down his plantings in front. Mr. Spitz explained where he felt there could be one combined entrance, between the two shown on the plan. He felt that with the poor sight distance in this area, one entrance would be better than two. Mr. Belter felt that trucks trying to get into the site would have problems coming down that hill and turning into the property. They will have to come down the hill because they cannot come from the other direction due to the weight limitation on the Limekiln bridge. He noted that getting out of the site and going up the hill would be difficult and trucks would probably pull out very slowly. Mr. Poger suggested a single access now with the possibility of a second one later. Two accesses did not bother Mrs. Maher. Mr. Woolery did not like two entrances, but felt that because of the change in grade on the site, plus the low traffic volume, two would be all right in this case. ( .A j PLANNING COMMISSION 4. JANUAR7 4. 1983 Mr. Brady said he would grass over the existing gravel area on the lot. Mr. Mona felt that as traffic volime increased, the Commission might prefer fewer entrances and he suggested two entrances now and one only at a later date. Mr. Brady said that was all right with him. Mrs. Hurd, and Messrs. Poger and Mona felt one entrance only should be allowed. Mr. Woolery preferred one, but felt, along with Mrs. Maher and Messrs. Jacob and Bolter that two were all right. Mr. Mona noted that the second entrance was contingent on removal of earth on the airport land, and that the Commission would -haze the right, at a later date, to re-examine the property and perhaps require only a single curb cut. George Brady, dated November 1982, subject to the following stipulations: 1. The westernmost drive shall be contingent upon improvement of the line of sight by removal of earth on the adjacent property. 2. Any increase in the proposed use or m_ent of this property shall cause the Planni combine the two drives into one driveway. lication for further devel ssion to examine the need 3. Parking adjacent to Airport Parkway shall be eliminated and the area shall be seeded. 4. A storm drainage plan and septic system information shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. The proposed fence shall be extended across the entire front of the rear buildings and storage area. 6. A bond for landscaping and for site work related to sight -distance improvements shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. A revised site plan - conta#niAg required information from stipulations 1 and 5 - shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. This approval expires in 6 months. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion. Mr. Spitz felt #2 did not do anything, but Mr. Poger felt it informed Mr. Brady of what the Commission might do in the future. The motion carried with Mr. Mona voting no because he did not like the two drives. Budget for upcoming fiscal year Mr. Spitz noted that the professional assistance item had been lower last year than in previous years. It had not always been spent, but last year the Commission could have spent more than it had allocated. That is why the figure has gone to $9,000 for the proposed new budget this year. Mr. Mona moved to recommend that the budget as presented be sent to the City Council and Mr. Jacob seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. State of Vermont Department of Fish and Game Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Natural Resources Conservation Council Mr. George Brady 1240 Airport Parkway South Burlington, VT 05401 AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 February 28, 1986 RE: PB-4-1093-1 and PB-4-1136, Green Mountain Childcare Building and Alarmaster Building, Airport Parkway, South Burlington. Dear Mr. Brady: Recently we issued the above Land Use Permits. Land Use Permit PB-4-1093-1 approved the increase in the maximum number of children to use the Green Mountain Childcare building to 45 children. This approval was based on a letter received from Michael Andronaco date stamped February 26, 1986 which states that the plumbing changes noted in the conditions of your Land Use Permit PB-4-1093 were completed, and the submitted soil data and sewage disposal design by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc. showing the connection of the downstairs bathroom to the sewage disposal system for the Alarmaster Building. Land Use Permit PB-4-1136 approved the Alarmaster building placement including the combined sewage disposal system. Since the interior plumbing is existing and was not changed in the Alarmaster building, we will accept the submitted information as being adequate. We want to thank you for bringing these buildings under compliance with the Environmental Protection Rules. Please keep in mind that any future additions or alterations concerning public buildings require application, review and approval prior to commencement of construction. Please do no hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Mary K. Clark Assistant Regional Engineer cc: FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc. City of South Burlington ✓ SRS Daycare Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Michael Andronaco Hazel Gordon James Dodge u State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT CASE NO. PB-4-1093-1 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT George Brady Environmental Protection Rules ADDRESS 1240 Airport Parkway Chapter 4 - Public Buildings So. Burlington, VT 05401 Chapter 7 - Sewage Disposal This project consisting of increasing the maximum number of children at the Green Mountain Childcare building to 45 children based on the approval of the use of a downstairs bathroom which is connected to an on -site sewage disposal system approved under Land Use Permit PB-4-1136, located at 1238 Airport Parkway in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions: GENERAL 1. The project must be completed as shown on the plans approved in Land Use Permit PB-4-1136 and which have been stamped APPROVED by the Division of Protection. No alteration of these plans shall be allowed except where written application has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained. SEWAGE DISPOSAL 2. This project is approved for the existing subsurface wastewater disposal system. No buildings, roads, water lines, or other construction that might interfere with the installation or operation of the sewage disposal field is permitted on or near the continuous area. All isolation distances as set forth in Chapter 7, of the Environmental Protection Rules. If at any time this system fails to function properly and/or creates a health hazard, the Division of Protection is to be immediately notified. PLUMBING 3. The applicant is reminded that all plumbing material and workmanship must meet the standards of the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 9, Plumbing; the National Plumbing Code; and the requirements of the Vermont Fire Prevention Section of the Department of Labor and Industry. 4. No alterations to the existing building which would change or affect the interior waste plumbing, water supply, or wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Environmental Conservation. Dated this 28th day of February, 1986 in the Village of Essex Junction, Vermont. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION Mary K Clark Ernest P. Christianson Assistant Regional Engineer Regional Engineer cc: Donald Robisky Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry City Planning Commission,,,/ SRS Daycare Michael Andronaco FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc. James Dodge Hazel Gordon January 5, 19U George Brady 1240 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear George, Enclosed is a copy of the South Burlington Planning Conmbission's final approval with stipulations and findings of fact for your two new buildings. Please note that several items must be cc%Tleted before you can get a build- ing permit. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, Ci ty i Planner DHS/mcg 2 Encls MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 12/30/82 2) Indian Creek There has apparently been no change in the various parties' position concerning the through -road between Indian Creek and Ridgewood Estates (see enclosed). Also, there have been no changes in the proposed boundary line between the two developments. The Indian Creek developers would like to make one minor change by adding extra living space to the end units of some of the buildings. This should be -no problem as•long as all required setbacks and distances between buildings are maintained. 3) Brady The Zoning Board has granted a multiple use variance to allow erection of two buildings on a site already occupied by a small office building and several storage/light industrial buildings. The two new buildings were relocated from the Barnes property (residential) next to the airport terminal. The applicant's intention is to use the buildings for small offices, but he has also asked for and received approval to allow limited residential use if the office space can not be rented. The applicant has requested two access points because of topography and landscaping reasons. However, the site has some definite site distance limit- ations, and I cannot support the request for two entrances. It would be better to close the existing entrance and move it part way up the hill. Proposed number of parking spaces is adequate. However, parking areas must not interfere with location of septic systems. Proposed landscaping in the front of the property is adequate. The existing storage/industrial uses are to the rear of the property and should be screened. A fence is indicated but may have to be extended to the other side of the driveway. 4) Budget See enclosure. February 10, 1983 Mr. George Brady 1240 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear George: Your application for a zoning permit is still pending due to the fact that you have stipulations setforth by the Planning Commission. Upon compliance with these stipulations a permit will be issued, any work completed without a permit is in direct violation. A permit is also rfquired for the on --site sewer system, the design imst be submitted to this office for approval. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call we. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer WATC9 F� �4 Date Received By Date Application Carplet*d and Received By BY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGMN APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE +R14BE"R OF: (a) Owner of Reoord (b) Applicant (c) Contact Person 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: it ���i p / 3) PROPOSED USE (s) 42.�. •i 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e.,•# of units, floor area, etc.) 3 'X3c. 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings Z. o 0 (b) Landscaping 6 OQdb ^ (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) A%w! _ _/.)/tiSet v 7) ESTIMATED PROTECT COMPLETION DAZE 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 6 $ 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION 10) PEAK GAYS OF OPERATION A 001/-2 Fx,. DATE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR ZONING PERMIT PERMIT NO ........... 1st. Copy CODE OFFICER 2nd Copy CITY ENGINEER Zone............ 3rd. Copy CITY ASSESSOR Date /.i/ . /rz ...........•.......... 19 ........ 4th Copy APPLICANT The undersigned hereby applies for parmisslon to make certain building Improvements as described below. (Plans to be submitted If required by Building Inspector.) All construction to be completed in accordance with the Zoning Laws and Building Regulations of the City of South Burlington and the State of Vermont, and con- form to the Regulations of the National Board of Fire Underwriters and any and all Federal Regulations now in effect. CONSTRUCTION STREET e,- NUMBER 11LY& OCCUPANCY FLOORS Single Family B f 2 3 LOT SIZE: Frontage / Depth Lot No. Two Family Cement OWNER GQVt AdA BUILDER fjJ�4. Apartment No. Fam. Earth Store Pine WATER SUPPLY: ublic Private ❑ Offices Herd Wood SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Public ❑ Septic Tank Permit Warehouse Tile p Carpet ROAD OPENING: (Show layout) Permit # Res. Gars a Attic FI. & Strs. No. Cars Dit.�Att]__ ELEC. WIRING: Underground A� Overhead 0 Permit Gas Station - •Plot to scale Lot and Building Improvements, showing width of Front, Side and Rear yards. Mark N at Compass point Indicating North. � r■■� ■ ■■■lii:■■R ■■m ■11w"»d'9■I I■I I■■..m l■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■I■■■ ■■■■■r 7■■ LM!JIr449r!!11■1 I■■■■1 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ III INS ■■■■■■ m■■ ■NE-1jCaa11111 I■■■■i l■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ mI Imm smommommommi ������������������ • IMF ra ■1INN ■■■■■■■■■■■I 1■�diliNYil■hill■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ... ■11■■■■■■■■■■l�7,M■■■■ ■■■■■■Le.���■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■■ ■■■■■■Its+.■will■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ME ME MEMOMMiiiiILi21111EPSMINITEMNIF ■■ ■■ r■.��___.��__s_w�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Terra Cotta ROOFING■ Asph. Shingles ■ Asbes. Shingles : ■ Tile Metal Composition No Lighting .• Date 19 PERMIT VALID FOR SIX MONTHS MEMORANDUM Zb: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Airport Parkway George Brady Date: 12/30/82 1) Method of handling storm water should be shown. 2) Plans for on site sewage disposal shall be prepared and submitted to City. 3) Airport Parkway is a heavily traveled road. Access to development should be limited to a single road opening. 4) Existing parking adjacent to Airport Parkway should be eliminated and area seeded.