Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0009 Gregory Driver City of South B111-lit►(vton 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658.7955 September 23, 1987 Philip George P.O. Box 338 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. GEorge: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Jane B . Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 12RIvIt, PLANNER 658-7955 August 10, 1987 Mr. Philip George P.O. Box 338 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning appeal Dear Mr. George: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the Municipal Offices Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, August 24, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your zoning application. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a Fiublic hearing at the South Bur- ngton Municipal Offices, Con- ference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, August 24, 1987, at 7:00. P.M. to consider the follow- ing: 01 Appeal of Allan and Rise Berard seeking approval, from Section 19.65, Multiple uses, sub section 19.652 of the South Bur- lington Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 40' x 60' addition, occupying an area of approximately 3400 square feet as a repair shop and contractor's yard, on a lot con- taining 41,400 square feet lo- cated at 73 Ethan Allen Drive. #2 Appeal of Joseph P. Kelley seeking approval, from Section 19.65, Multiple uses sub section 19.652 of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for per- mission to occupy an area 30' x 40' for officgs and on area of 25' x 40' as a storage facility in conjunction with the existing use (truck terminal) on a lot con- taining 42,780 square feet, lo- cated at 80 Ethan Allan Drive. #3 Appeal of Davis Company, Larry Williams, agent seeking a variance, from Section 18.00, Dimensional requirements sub Bur - section 18.105 of the South Bur- lington Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 54' x 96' building with approxi. mately 54 square feet located to within ninety-five (95) feet of the centerline of Potash Brook, lo- cated at 20 Farrell Street. #4 Appeal of Crawford Gregory and Philip George, agent seek- ingg approval, from Section 19.65, Multiple uses, sub section 19.652 of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for per- mission to construct a building containing 13,600 square feet and occupying said building with a maximum of five (5) uses, (stor- ege and distribution facilities, wholesale establishments and re- pair shops) on a lot containing 1.16 acres, located at 9 Gregory Drive. #5 Appeal of Alan Palmer seek- ingg approval, from Section 19.65, Multiple uses sub section 19.652 of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for per- mission to construct a 46' x 184' addition (containing approxi- mately 12,600 square feet of floor area) occupying said area as a retail -office complex, on a lot containing 1.8 acres, located at 4050 Williston Rood. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer August 8, 1987 No Text NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT A el // E..�-��s Name, address and telephone # of applicant Name, address of property owner Property location and ,description T E. ,3 6S-04 S9�iF7; G/��G�RV I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following. n i tonal use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second'and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line ---------------------------=----------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: /J Appeal of seeking` �`` ,,p ; C from Section r of the South .y� 4 Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to 67 r . � � h•. ��'�" �,,,,� /1.� Cis-c..,- � -a� 4�-+ ,�.- d- � . �Jq LLZ I R - 300.00, 7'- 214.81' L -372-851 NO 451E \6/ 49 / - N 08 14,5 3251, \ ` \ 50,594 ft. AREA N A -CO 958ft. 2\N \ V V\ 6'- <\ 9 Approximate Mudd}, Brook % TOWN LINE �'' \ �\ \. A /00' Green Mountain 34.5 A-v Transmisslon\ Power Co Easement 1.0.-U kv L45fribuflon State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife t Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation April 22, 1999 Eric M. Knudsen, Esquire Landgrock, Sperry & Wool P.O. Box 721 Burlington, VT 05402-0721 Dear Eric: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-5656 Subject: Case 94CO437; Six Lot Commercial Subdivision, U.S. Route 2, South Burlington, VT. This letter shall confirm that I accepted, based on the information I had on September 12, 1991, the sanitary sewer line extension and pump station as having been constructed in general accordance with the conditions of Certification of Compliance #4C0437. Therefore, Condition #3 of Certification of Compliance #4C0437 has been satisfied. Please contact me should you need anything further. Sincerely, Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer c City of South Burlington �oN-� AGFtic� <uQ O POR�P,�` STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 August 23, 1996 Mr. Tyler Hart Trudell Consulting Engineers 14 Blair Park Road, P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Subject: South Burlington, US 2/Gregory Drive Act 250 Application #4C0149 Dear Tyler: Jj . I �t. 4 /% We have completed a review of your traffic counts and check of signal warrants for the above -referenced project and offer the following comments. We strongly disagree with the procedure used to check for signal warrants at the intersection of Gregory Drive and US 2. For us to accurately check the need for a signal, we need a minimum of 10-hour turning movement count (showing all moves at the intersection). We are fairly confident that a signal at this location is not warranted since the PM Peak of the turning movement provided showed low volumes on the side streets that either do not, or just barely, meet certain signal warrants. Because traffic using Gregory Drive is commercially related, we assume other daytime hours would be lower. In addition to the above, the intersection is located on a fairly steep grade on US 2. It would be difficult for traffic heading eastbound to stop, especially in slippery winter conditions. Because of this, a signal should not be considered at this location at the present time. If traffic increases in the future because of development in the park, they should be encouraged to exit via Shunpike Road rather than onto US 2. Sincerely, AWV4�101&v Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section cc: Andrew Rowe, Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Joseph Weith, City of South Burlington Faith Ingulsrud, Assistant District Environmental Coordinator Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. zo/ - .......... ell, x J(V K-C I a t -' ° �/lo N A Q/ 0144 ,�- '2 Memorandum - Planning April 11, 1989 agenda items March 7, 1989 Page 2 Traffic: The applicant estimates 24 peak hour trip ends to be generated by the development. Based on I.T.E. trip data for warehousing use, 12 peak hour trips will be generated. using ITE trip data for building materials and lumber store use, 37 trips would be generated. Since the proposed use falls somewhere between warehousing and building supply use, the 24 peak hour trip estimate sounds right. The Act 250 umbrella permit allowed a total of 125 trip ends during the peak hour from this subdivision. To date, 92 project- ed trip ends have been approved. This project will bring the total to 116. In addition, the 4/8/80 approval for the subdivi- sion contained a stipulation that the traffic situation would be reviewed after development of 4 lots. I do not believe it was ever reviewed. This is the 5th lot to be developed. A trip end survey was conducted while the 4th lot was under construction The survey indicated that 79 trips were generated during the peak hour. The applicant shall pay $237 to the Williston Road Traffic Impact Area 2 program based on the 24 peak hour trips. Sewer A sewer allocation of 150 gpd is granted. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 per gallon fee. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. 3) COOLEY-WOOD, LOTS 28 & 29, ETHAN ALLEN INDUSTRIAL PARK. Cooley -Wood Corporation proposes to construct a 22,500 square foot, 1 story building for speculative industrial/warehousing use. It is proposed to combine lots 28 and 29 into one lot for this project. This will require an amended final plat (Belter's 21 lot subdivision) to be recorded showing these 2 lots combined into one. This application should either be tabled or stipulated that no permit will be issued until the amended final plat is recorded. The property is zoned I-C. It is bounded on the west and south by undeveloped industrial lots, on the north by warehousing/distribution use and on the east by Commerce Avenue. Access: Access is shown from Commerce Avenue via a 29 foot wide driveway near the border of lot 30. 2 M E M U R A N 1) U t-1 To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner �• Re: September 4, 1987 Date: September 8, 1987 2) PHIL GEORGE, �L�Gi #3, 9 GREGORY DRIVE Mr. George proposes to construct a 12,400 square foot building on a 50,594 square foot lot for multiple uses (storage, distribu- tion, warehousing and repair shops). The applicant received multiple use approval on August 2.1, 1987. Access: Access is shown via a 32 foot wide drive from the new section! of Gregory Drive which will be realigned and extended to Green Tree park. It, is not clear whether this applicant is proposing to construct the connection to Green Tree Part: or whether they will wait for Green Tree Park to do it. This lot is owned by C.W. Gregory. As you know, Gregory Drive was not built to City- Standards and is unacceptable to the City. Enclosed is a letter from `1r•. Gregory's attorney stating his intentions. City Attorney Steve Stitzel noted that. the Planning Commission can not accept this letter as proof of resolution of the problem since it has no jurisdiction over acceptance of the street. until this issue is resolved to the City- Manager's and City Council's satisfaction, access is unacceptable given the condition of the road. Further- more it is required that only :3 lots are permitted on a private drive before a City Street is required. Circulation. A 24 - 34 foot wide circulation drive is shown oii three sides of the building. The drive in the back of tho building is gravel. Parking Twenty l,arl.in.� spaces arc rF<luircd. I'he Tans 11o:: Z 1-- I.andscapi rio _ '!'III- s i tc' 1't'.'C.j:i i 1'('ti S r !i•10 i rI new i andv;(.`apj.jig. Th.' plans shtli: S i 94%0 1andscapi li- bond post•=ct pric,r to permit. '1r'�.if1.i.c V, parI t:,f' tha s IIit. ii I 1:'c Leak hour t1 :1• ends were a1.iowed t'r=om this do*%,,-it.,pment.. i'i►i�, appiie.ailt. 10 trip ends i:hicil i,, roas.,n.ahie forinrllititrial/m,irlufac`tllrirl� ire , for this s i z*.• bui i d i tig . 'I'ci da t.t', il'd! pro.it-, t.ed t. r• i p i niios 11;i•,'t:• it rapprovt:�41 . T I I f' I .irltl 1 119 c t;n11n i i on .11)1,1 o 7i I of 1 980 r yaa i rt .i :t t•eviei, t,f• t rrl 1, V 14• be..i'olC ;11;1;1•4)\;a 1 t.,f' flit° :ith i.c;1 i t {I i T I I i ;; i r< c1i1 i I t i in ,an:l I : i s r,t ! ht lit t•t3 f' >t „m1, ti i t ht:' 1 ii;tii i f: lei ,•tl { I't•t I�II k i t r 11i,' I I '� t� I I I , s !:tilt{ Memor'alidum - Planning August 8, 1987 Page 2 noted that approval of lots #5 and #6 could be upheld until conditions are brought up to par. (Minutes of 4/8/80) Other: See Chief Goddette's and Bill Szymanski's comments. 3) THE DAVIS COMPANY, 20 FARRELL STREET The Davis Company proposes to construct a 10,000 square foot office building on a 1.3 acre lot. The applicant received a variance to build the building 5 feet within the Conservation Zone. Access: Access is shown from rt 24 foot wide driveway off of Farrell Street. Circulation: The 24 foot. wide drive provides circulation along the north side of the building. Chief Goddette required a 30 foot wide driveway along the northern side of the building for fire access. Plans must, be revised to shoe; this. Parking: Forty spaces are required; 41 are shown. Landscaping: The project requires 59500 in new plantings. No plant .list is shown on the plan and the six 3 inch caliper norway maples and low hedge are valued at approximately $2800. This should be revised prior to permit. Some credit for ezi.stin t.rees in the CO Zone might be considered by the Commission. Tr'a_ft'ic: This lot is not in the traf'f.i(-� overr'I:ty •Lortf'. However, 'I S750 contribution towards the Shelburne tt(/ad inter"ection improvement fund is requested base-,d on t.h«� Zit trip ends projected durin.,, the peak hour. (7the�r: See 13ii l Szymanski's and Chief' ('uddot t.r-'s comments. A �c,tY0 t• i11.1 c)r..,_i t i on o f 600 gI.)d s h o u I (i be nu,(i( ,.laid t he $250 peer ,'al ton ff e paid pr'iclr t.o he..r'nti t.. 1 'r WI 1-L i AM SHEARER } .56 1.'VI T P. V . D � I`;\T( III.\ iA)A:; "Ir . tih, ;I I.,'t' "'AS Urltth 1 C. t 1' 1 i t' i'F`\' i 1� 1;11o, 1 li lFile i o.,. t 11, Hit'f6 In('I'(ti11()ltId htr it Ili %t ioli 1 i:l t, a t I I i.. aI)lil l(':It i• iin t i i Sepl,emhe i- 22, 1987 . 5. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 23, 1984 tor. Poger asked about the deceleration lane and was told that the developer needed to install that before the building was occupied. That was part of the subdivision approval and has not been done yet. Mr. Poger said the Commission did not want the building occupied until the deceleration lane was in and the fire hydrant should be moved before a building permit was issued. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Robert and Althea Platt for the construction of a 6400 sq. ft. building for a manufacturing and commercial use located on lot #1 of the Gregory and Daughters industrial subdivision depicted on a plan entitled "Proposal for Robert H. and Althea S. Platt, lot #1, Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park South Burlin ton Vermont" as prepared by Adams Construction Company, Inc., and dated 9 26 84 with the following stipulations: 1. That a deceleration lane be built on Williston Road in front of the lot, and a bond posted prior to permit in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer, conditioned that the lane be built prior to occupancy. 2. That_a permit is contingent upon developer of the original subdivision completing the street and the utilities and that a bond be posted prior to permit, conditioned that the street and utilities be completed prior to occupancy.. 3. That the entrance drive shall have uniform radii on both sides of the street intersection. 4. That a $6000 bond for landscaping be posted prior to permit. 5. That the sewer allocation for this lot is 450 gpd, and this amount is deducted from the 6 lot allocation. 6. That the fire hydrant will be relocated to the entrance of the industrial_park prior to permit. 7. That this approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion and all voted for it. Informal discussion of a proposed 158 lot Planned Unit Development on Hinesburg Road, West of Ledge Knoll Mr. Carl Cobb is the agent for Homer and Marie Dubois. Mr. Poger noted that in the past Plan and Zoning Regulations, this Commission had tried to set up zoning in the Southeast Quadrant which would slow the rate of development. When the proposals went to the City Council, though, they felt that the existing zoning in the Quadrant would be adequate to protect it for a long time. He noted that double approval from both Council and Commission had been left in the ordinances of the city. He assumed that the Commission would deal with its usual development criteria and the Council would decide whether it was time to allow development in the Quadrant. He said he was reluctant to rush into heavily developing the Quadrant for housing, because that might irretrievably set up the development out there. He felt the city should take a look at its long-range plans for the area. He noted that work on the new Master Plan would begin very soon. Mr. Tyler Hart explained the proposal. It is on a 93 acre parcel, which is open field. A swale runs through the land. Municipal sewer and water are available. Two accesses to Hinesburg Road are shown and these would be single family homes in a conventional grid system. 10 acres of open space are PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 8, 1980 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, April 8, 1980 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 1175 Williston Road Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; George Mona, Peter Jacob, Robert Walsh, Kirk Woolery, James Ewing Member Absent Ernest Levesque Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Robert Krebs, Meg Lukens, Dave Nicholson, C.Y. Gregory Minutes of April 1. 1980 Mr. Mona noted that at the last meeting, he had wanted the words "and noted on the plan of record" added to the second stipulation of the University Mall approval. Although the same phrase was not at that time added also to the first stipulation, Mr. Mona felt it had been the intent of the Commission that the phrase apply,,.also to the City Planner in stipulation 1. The Commission agreed that that had been their intent, and the words "and noted on the plan of record" should be added after "City Planner" in stipulation 1 on page 2. Mr. Woolery moved to approve the April 1, 1980 minutes as amended, Mr. Jacob seconded, and all voted aye. Final plat application of Gregory and Daughters for a 6-lot industrial subdivision on a new street to be called Gregory Drive off Williston Road Mr. Robert Krebs said the plan was relatively unchanged from the last meeting. City Manager Szymanski's requests have been incorporated into the plan. Water and sewer will be provided for all 6 lots and a new right turn lane will be added on Williston Road. The state has reviewed the plan, as has Traffic Engineering Associates (see attached copy of that report. The maximum amount of traffic anticipated at this intersection is 9% of its total capacity, Mr. Krebs told the commission. A sign prohibiting left turns out of the development will be posted. Mr. Mona felt that would be totally unenforceable. It was noted that a large truck could go straight into the street opposite this development in case of an emergency (a car coming over the hill while the truck blocked several lanes). It was felt that No Left Turn signs would be ignored. The possibility of a traffic light at the intersection was discussed. Mr. Krebs stated that if a truck did try to go left up the hill and another car came down the hill, that car could go into the new right turn lane to avoid the truck. It was noted that more vehicles would go toward Burlington than Williston. It was suggested that, at a later time, if there appeared to be a problem here, a light could be studied. Noting that it might be dangerous to have a light on this hill, the commission suggested cutting down the hill, or putting the light at the top of the hill and having it tripped by exiting trucks. Mr. Krebs noted that there would be a Plashing light 750' before the intersection, and Fir. Gregory added that someday there would be a road for trucks to exit from the development to the rear to Shunpike Road, Kimball Avenue, and then to Kennedy Drive. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 8. 1980 The commission liked that idea. Mr. Poger found Traffic Engineering Associates' report confusing. It stated there might be J,5 vehicles for this development at the peak homer, and Mr. Poger felt that was a very high figure. He also wanted to know what the Associates would say about the intersection given the possibility that cars would come over the hill, not at the posted 40 mph speed, but at 45 or 50mph. He wanted to know how fast a car could come over the hill and still have good sight -distance. Mr. Poger suggested reviewing traffic again after a few of these lots had been developed. E Mr. Gregory said Green Mountain Power had given permission to move its poles if he needs more room to build on lot 4. Mr. David Nicholson represented Mrs. DeLeclair, the neighbor to the easttof the property. She is concerned about drainage. It was noted that there would be catch basins for water, as well as a ditch from the turnaround to the brook and a natural ditch along the property line of the two lots. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of Gregory and Daughters for a 6 lot industrial subdivision on a new street called Gregory Drive off Williston Road as depicted on a plan and attachd c'ra—_'nFs entitled "Final Plan, Gre--org and Daughters. Industries Park," rprer_ rea by ;rebs and La_rsing Cansultinf Engineers and crated February 1980, subiect t& the follck•inj7 stipulations: 1. Driveway entrances to lots 3 and 4 shall be located so as to be compatible with the future right of way to the RDR property. Front -yard setbacks shall also conform to the proposed right of way. 2. Lot 3, which may be bisected by a future road, is approved as one building lot only. 3. Upon development of the RDR property to the west, the Planning Commission shall review the need for a street connection to be provided by the subsequent developer to the Gregory Drive cul-de-sac. 4. The following revisions in construction and -site details shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer and shall be incorporated into the final map submission: (a) Addition of a curb cut and pull -off area adjacent to the pumping station large enough to accomodate a service truck. (b) Water service to the pumping station. (c) Catch basin grates of type Neenah R3405-R or equivalent. 5. If any portion of the subdivision is served by three-phase power, that type of power shall also be provided to the pumping station_ 6. The existing fire hydrant at Williston Road shall be relocated as approved by the Fire Chief and the new location shall be indicated on the final map submision. %. Sewer capacity for the industrial park has been estimated at 1500_to 2000 gallons per day for the purpose of sizing the pumping station. Each lot's allocation of the Airport treatment plant capacity shall be made at the time of site plan review. im n PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 8. 1980 8. Bonding for all public improvements shall be arranged prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the subdivision. The statement "easements and roads to be dedicated as required" on page 1 of 4 shall be deleted. 9. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days. 10. The City Planner shall review the traffic resulting from this industrial park after the development of 4 lots and report his findings to the Planning Commission. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion. The Commission requested that the stop line for exiting traffic from the development be moved closer to the road so exiting cars could see if traffic was coming down the hill. It was noted that, if the Commission did not find the traffic conditions" acceptable after 4 lots are developed, at the site -plan reviews of lots 5 and 6 approval could be withheld until the conditions are brought up to par. That may involve some expense to the city or Mr. Gregory. The motion carried without dissent. Continuation of public hearing on application by the Glenwood Coruoration Mery Brown for Revised Final Plat approval for cluster J 20 units of phase 2 of the Stonehedge development Mr. Spitz said the applicant had requested that this item be postponed. Since neither the applicant, nor the neighbors, who had been told that there would be a postponement of the hearing, were present, Mr. Spitz did not feel the Commission should have a lengthy discussion of the item. He told the board that the two questions raised at previous meetings had been answered by the City Attorney, in his 2/7 memo. The Commission noted that the letter stated that the entire PUD should be reviewed anew if the alterations would have a significant adverse effect on the character of the PUD, and if the Commission could articulate the ways in which it would do this. Discussion centered on the meaning of the word "character" in this case. The residents of the area feel that the alteration would profoundly affect the character of the area. Mr. Mona felt the concern of the residents was for what the new units would do to those already there. Mr. Walsh felt that the Commission should review the plan with a view to conserving the value of the existing buildings, because he felt that was the intent of the statutes (Vermont Planning and Development Act). Mr. Jacob felt that if the residents had complaints, their recourse was to the courts, particularly if what had been represented to them was being violated. The Commission discussed whether the proposed change was drastic or not. Mr. Woolery had some concerns about allowing units in phase 2 to be constructed before phase 1 was completed. The Commission, if it approved the -'change for phase 2, did not want to have units in phase 1 altered. Mr. Mona did not want to approve any change unless he had a clear picture of what would happen to the units other than in cluster J, in both phase 1 and 2. Mr. Spitz felt this discussion should continue when the applicant and neighbors were present, but Mr. Mona felt that no decision would be made tonight and Messrs. Jacob and Ewing felt this discussion was to help them straighten things out in their own minds. Mr. Woolery moved to continue the public hearinF. for the application b the Glenwood Corporation for revised final Plat approval for cluster J 20 units of phase 2 of the Stonehedge developme City Hall. Mr. Mona seconded the motion and t until April 1 it carried 7-0. 0Dmat 1 TAX MAP #: 21-4-1 LOCATION: 1 GREGORY DRIVE DATE 11-27-79 1-22-80 4-8-80 1-3-84 1-24-84 10-15-84 10-23-84 /-v7 * I GRAND LIST #: 0740-00001-C APPLICATION PURPOSE SK 6 LOT SUBDIVISION PP it if tt FP It it if CUP AQUA PARK SP-WITHDRAWN it it CUP MULTIPLE USE BLDG. SP it it It FILE NAME: GREGORY, C.W. it et it it BROSSEAU, GRANT if if GREGORY/PLATT,LOT #1 GREGORY,CRAWFORD & JUDITH � TAX MAP #: 21-4-12 LOCATION: 3 BREGORY DRIVE GRAND LIST #: 0740-00003-C DATE APPLICATION PURPOSE 11-27-79 SK 6 LOT SUBDIVISION 1-22-80 PP " " It 4-8-80 FP " " it 6-10-85 CUP PARK & FLY 7-23-85 SK ^ " B-6-B5 SP It It FILE NAME: GREGORY,C.W. CHARLIER, ROBERT CHARLIER, LYNN & BOB " " " TAX MAP #: 21-4-2 LOCATION: 5 GREGORY DRIVE DATE 11-27-79 1-22-80 4-8-80 10-15-84 6-10-85 7-23-85 8-6-85 GRAND LIST #: 0740-00005-C APPLICATION PURPOSE SK 6 LOT SUBDIVISION pp if " " FP it ItIt APPROVAL FILLING CUP PARK & FLY SK " SPD " FILE NAME: GREGORY,C.W. GREGORY/PLATT, LOT #1 CHARLIER, ROBERT CHARLIER, LYNN & BOB In I TAX MAP Q 21-4-3 LOCATION: 9 GREGORY DRIVE GRAND LIST Q 0740-00009-C DATE APPLICATION PURPOSE 11-27-79 SK 6 LOT SUBDIVISION 1-22-BO PP 11 4-8-80 FP It 6-10-85 CUP PARK. & FLY 7-23-85 SK " 8-6-85 SP " 8-24-87 CUP MULTIPLE USE BLDG. 9-9-87 SP-DENIED " FILE NAME: GREGORY,C.W. 11 11 11 11 CHARLIER, ROBERT CHARLIER, LYNN & BOB 11 11 11 GEORGE,PHILIP & GREGORY GREGORY,C.W. TAX MAP #: 21-4-4 GRAND LIST #: 0740-00010-C LOCATION: 10 GREGORY DRIVE DATE APPLICATION PURPOSE FILE NAME: 11-27-79 SK 6 LOT SUBDIVISION GREGORY, C.W. 1-22-80 PP " " 4-8-80 FP of" 3-27-89 CUP AUTO REPAIP/SALES C.W.GREGORY,FLAGG..... TAX MAP #: 21-4-5 GRAND LIST #: 0740-00006-C LOCATION: 6 GREGORY DRIVE DATE APPLICATION PURPOSE FILE NAME: 11-27-80 SK 6 LOT SUBDIVISION GREGORY,C.W. 1- 2 2- 8 0 pp it " " " " 4- 8- 0 0 FP is it " " " 7-22--85 CUP AUTO REPAIR BARRY'S TRANSMISSION 8- 1 3- 8 5 S P " " It " TAX MAP #: 21-4-6 GRAND LIST #: 0740-00002-C LOCATION: 2 GREGORY DRIVE DATE APPLICATION PURPOSE FILE NAME: 11-27-80 SK 6 LOT SUBDIVISION GREGORY, C.W. 1-22-80 PP 1. 11 Is IfIt 4-8-80 FP ItI' 11 1' It 5-28-85 SP STORAGE/DIST. BLDG. RIVCO 10-22-85 RSP ADDITIONAL PARKING " City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 31, 1995 Mr. Crawford Gregory Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Re: Gregory Drive Performance Bond Dear Moose: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 As of June 7, 1995 the City of South Burlington agrees to release a letter of credit (#89-1550) which was issued by the Vermont National Bank. As you are aware you were required to post this letter -of -credit in the amount of fifteen thousand ($15,000) dollars in order to insure the workmanship of Gregory Drive. Please submit a copy of this letter to Michael Gingras at the Vermont National Bank. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer RW/peh City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 Tune 7, 1990 Mr. Crawford Gregory Nob Hill Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Gregory Drive paving Dear Moose: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that according to the terms of an agreement between you and the City of South Burlington, dated March 29, 1989, the City is required to reduce the letter of credit to fifteen thou- sand ($15,000) dollars for a five year term. Mr. Michael Gingras of the Vermont National Bank has been con- tracted by this office and is prepared to make the adjustment in your letter of credit (#89-1550). Please contact Mr. Gingras, and have the necessary paper work that will reduce the amount to fifteen thousand forwarded to this office . If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer cc: Mr. Michael Gingras RW/mcp PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 June 6, 1989 Mr. Crawford Gregroy Nob Hill Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Gregory Drive paving Dear Moose: Greetings, long time no see, how are you? ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that I am holding for safe keeping the agreements and letter of credit for the above caption project. According to the terms of the agreement the developer (that's you) will place an additional two inches of blacktop on a portion of Gregory Drive. Upon completion the City (that's me) agrees to reduce the letter of credit to fifteen thousand ($15,000) dollars. Upon completion of the blacktopping please contact this office in order that I can arrange release of your money. Very truly, truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp C A G R E E M E N T THIS AGREEMENT made this day of 'l V� 1,,_ :� !- , 198j, by and between Crawford W. Gregory, of Williston, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and the City of South Burlington, a Vermont municipal corporation situated in Chittenden County, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality". W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer received subdivision approval from Municipality for the construction and development of six industrial lots in a development to be known as Gregory Industrial Park as now depicted on a final plat entitled, "Gregory And Daughters Industrial Park, South Burlington, Vermont" dated February, 1980, revised June 11, 1985, March 3, 1987, June 16, 1987 and July 20, 1987; and WHEREAS, Developer was required by said approval to complete certain public improvements at its own expense and dedicate said improvements to Municipality; and WHEREAS, all public improvements have not yet been completed and accepted by Municipality; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement desire to provide for the proper and timely completion of said MCNEIL, MURRAY improvements and their acceptance by Municipality; & SORRELL, INC. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 271 SOUTH UNION STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and other good and valuable consideration the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows: 1. On or before July 1, 1989, Developer will place an additional two inches of blacktop pavement on that portion of Gregory Drive, so-called, which commences at the intersection of Gregory Drive and Williston Road and extends southerly up to station 15+00 as shown on sheet two of a subdivision plan entitled, "Subdivision Plat of Greentree Park, Shunpike Road, South Burlington, Vermont", dated March 16, 1987, revised June 17, 1987 and July 19, 1987 applying said blacktop in conformance with all customarily accepted construction practices. 2. On or before April 1, 1989, Developer shall deliver to Municipality an executed Letter of Credit and Letter of Credit Agreement for the benefit of Municipality in the amount of $25,000.00. These documents shall cover installation of the paving required in Paragraph 1 above and the replacement or repair of any faulty or defective workmanship within that portion of Gregory Drive described in Paragraph 1 for a period of five years from the date of installation of the two inches of blacktop pavement required in Paragraph 1 above. Upon Developer's completion of the paving required by Paragraph 1 above, Municipality agrees that the amount of the Letter of Credit required by this paragraph may be reduced to $15,000.00. 3. Within thirty days of Developer's obtaining the Letter of Credit as provided in Paragraph 2 above, City shall accept that portion of Gregory Drive described in Paragraph 1 as a public roadway. Developer shall be responsible for the preparation and delivery to Municipality of a suitable warranty deed to accomplish said acceptance. Said warranty deed may include language conveying to Municipality such water mains and sewer mains located within said roadway as Municipality has agreed to accept as public improvement. 4. Upon acceptance of Gregory Drive as a public roadway, Municipality agrees that Developer shall not thereafter be responsible for Gregory Drive except to the limits of Developer's responsibilities and obligations as contained in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above. 5. By entering into this Agreement, Municipality has not acknowledged that Gregory Drive as presently constructed is free of faulty or defective workmanship. 6. Municipality agrees to release to Gregory that Offer of Irrevocable Dedication as to the "old" reserved right of way across Lot #3 contained in the original approval of Gregory Industrial Park as Gregory Drive has been relocated and now ties into that development known as Greentree Park. Gregory shall prepare all documents as are necessary so as to accomplish the same. 3 Dated at South Burlington, Vermont this cw�26 day of , 1988. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON r. By: cej--- Dul A orized Agent Dated at 9—SStx- -stm raw' , Vermont this d�day of McNc , 1989. CRAWFORD W. GREGOR 4 WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that We, CRAWFORD W. GREGORY and JUDITH T. GREGORY of Williston in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantors, in the consideration of TEN AND MORE Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Vermont of South B!irl.ington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantee, by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land, 60 feet in uniform width, extending from the southerly terminous of Gregory Drive as previously conveyed to the City of South Burlington, proceeding in a generally southwesterly direction to the westerly boundary line of the property of the within Grantors. This conveyance is for the purpose of conveying the remainder of that roadway depicted as "Gregory Drive" on a "Final Plan, Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park, South Burlington, Vermont," dated February 1980, last revised July 20, 1987 and of record at Map Volume 252, Page 11.5 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said portion of Gregory Drive being herein conveyed is more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point on the westerly side of Gregory Drive, said point being marked by an iron pin and being the southeasterly most corner of Lot 2B and the northeasterly most corner of Lot 3 as shown on said plan; thence proceeding S 14 degrees 31' 26" W a distance of 69.84 feet, more or less, to a concrete monument; thence continuing along the easterly boundary of Lot No. 3 following a curve with a distance of 328.85 feet as shown on said plan, to a point marked by an iron pin, said iron pin located on the westerly boundary of the herein BERGLAWOFFICES . Grantors' land and being the southwesterly most boundary COOMBS & FITZPATRICK of Lot No. 3; thence proceeding S 08 degrees 18' 45" W a distance of 61.49 feet, more or less, to a point, said point being marked by an iron pin and being on the northerly boundary line of Lot No. 4 as depicted on said above referred to plan; thence proceeding along the westerly boundary of Lot No. 4 and following a curve a distance of 327.54 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pin, said iron pin marking the northwesterly corner of Lot No. 4 and the southwesterly corner of Lot No. 5 as depicted on the above referred to plan; thence proceeding along the westerly boundary of Lot No. 5 and following a curve for a distance of 89.27 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument; thence proceeding N 14 degrees 31' 26" E to a point; thence turning a 90 degree angle to the left and proceeding across Gregory Drive a distance of 60 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pin, said iron pin being the point and place of beginning. The last described angle with a length of 60 feet is also known and depicted as Station 15+00 on Sheet 2 of a subdivision plan entitled "Subdivision Plat of Greentree Park, Shunpike Road, South Burlington, Vermont". Also included in this conveyance is all right, title and interest in and to all water and sewer mains and other utilities located within said right of way and the herein grantee agrees to accept the same upon delivery of this conveyance. Said strip of land is a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Crawford W. Gregory and Judith T. Gregory by Warranty Deed of Harold P. Brown, Jr., and Janice H. Brown dated January 16, 1980 and recorded in Book 158 on Pages 234-236 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington. Reference is further made to a Quit -Claim Deed from the Trustees of the Diocese of Vermont to Crawford W. and Judith T. Gregory dated March 4, 1980 and of record at Book 141, Page 322 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington; and to Quit -Claim Deed from the City of South Burlington to Crawford W. and Judith T. Gregory dated 1989 and of record at Volume , Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records. To said deeds, the records thereof, and to all deeds and records therein referred to, reference is hereby made in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns, to LAW OFFICES its own use and behoof forever; and we the said Grantors, BERGERON, PARADIS, COOMBS & FITZPATRICK CRAWFORD W. GREGORY and JUDITH T. GREGORY, for ourselves and our heirs, executors and administrators, do covenant with the said Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, we are the sole owners of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; except as aforesaid, and except for utility easements as may appear on said plan, and we do hereby engage to WARRANTY AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we hereunto set our hands and seals • 7�r this day ofJ�,� 1989. IN THE PRESENCE OF: el J STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. CRAWFORD W. GREGORY _ �, I euyl c JUDITH T. GREGORY v At in said County this /4) day of rlr,lc 1989, Crawford W. Gregory and Judith T. Gr egn--.' personally appeared, and they acknowledged th- instrument, by them sealed and subscribed, to be their free act and deed. Before me, NOTARY PUBLIC LAW OFFICES BERGERON, PARADIS, COOMBS & FITZPATRICK VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05602 1. SELLER (TRANSFEROR) NAME(S) MAILING ADDRESS IN FULL - INCLUDING ZIP CODE SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. CRAWFORD W. GREGORY Nob Hill, Williston, VT 05495 JUDITH T. GREGORY Nob Hill, Williston, VT 05495 2. BUYER (TRANSFEREE) NAME(S) MAILING ADDRESS IN FULL - INCLUDING ZIP CODE SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Dorset Street So. Burlington VT 05403 = ' ' • ' 3. PROPERTY LOCATION (Address in full) 4. DATE OF CLOSING Gregory Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 5. INTEREST IN PROPERTY (Fee Simple, Life Estate, Perpetual Easement, Etc.) Perpetual Easement - Portion of Gregory Drive, South Burlington, VT 6. FRONTAGE AND DEPTH 7. TOTAL ACREAGE 60 feet frontage 625 feet +/- depth 8. BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. NONE 5. BARN 9. STORE 2. FACTORY 6. APARTMENT WITH (NUMBER) DWELLING UNITS 10. OTHER 3. ❑ HOUSE 7. MOBILE HOME 4. ❑ CAMP/VAcaT'ON 8, CONDOMINIUM WITH (NUMBER) DWELLING UNITS HOME CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE Q NEVER OCCUPIED PREVIOUSLY OCCUPIED ® 9. PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER AS SHOWN IN GRANDLIST BOOK (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ OPERATING FARM 5. COMMERCIAL 7. INDUSTRIAL 9. ® OTHER r O a dW a y 2. ❑ TIMBERLAND 4. Q GOVERNMENT USE 6. OPEN LAND 8. CAMP OR VACATION 10. PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. OPERATING FARM 5. COMMERCIAL 7. INDUSTRIAL 9. OX OTHER r o a dw ay 2. TIMBERLAND 4. GOVERNMENT USE 6. OPEN LAND 8. CAMP OR VACATION 11. IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland, Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appraisal Programs)? ❑ Yes E3 No 12. IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTION ENTITLED "VALUE." Transfer to a municiDality 13. TOTAL 15. PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY: IF LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE, ENTER FAIR MARKET 0 PRICE PAID $ VALUE AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES 14. PRICE PAID FOR $ 0 PERSONAL PROPERTY $ 16. TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. $ 0 FIRMI-70-11,71 M. 17. iIF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS: not ap P 1 i c ab 1 e (CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TOWN NUMBER RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF CORD _ _ REQUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX F300K ER -_ PAGE NO. ____ PAID. E $ -GRAND LIST OF 19RCEL NOS. SIGNED ___ - __ CLERK DATE Form PT-1 (7/88) 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructions) b. Value of property enrolled in current use program c. Value of qualified working farm d. Add Lines 1(a), (b) and (c) e. Tax rate f. Tax due on Special Rate Property: multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(e) 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line 15 on front of return b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(a) d. Tax rate e. Tax due on General Rate Property: multiply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d) 3. Total Tax Due: Add Line 1(f) and Line 2(e) and enter on Line 16 on front of return 0 (a) $ - (b) $ 0 (c) $ 0 (d) $ 0 - (e) $ 0.005 (f) $ 0 0 2. (a) $ 0 (b) $ 0 (c) $ (d) $ 0.0125 0 (e) $ 3. $ 0 Buyer(s) and Seller(s) certify as follows: A. That they have investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, if any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(s) advised the buyer(s) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may limit significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer is in compliance with or is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and is in compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number __ _ Number of acres —_ _ b. Parcel retained: Exemption Number ______._ _ Number of acres Sellers(s) further certify as follows: D. That this transfer of real property and any development thereon is in compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act 250), for the following reason: 1. This property is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and is in compliance with said permit, or 2. This property is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from instructions) E. That this transfer does/does not (strike one) result in a partition or division of land. Note: If it does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the Town Clerk. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THATTHIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE aw', City ot Southur in4 on J �711 T-. - 'G eg6ry Preparer's Signature-2 _ ti c�^c/Prepared by Bergeron, P a r a d i s, Coombs Print or Type) and Fitzpatrick Preparer's Address 3_.4 pear 1 St. . P. 0. Box 1 7 4 Essex Junction, VT 05453 NOTE: Residents, Part -Year Residents, Non -Residents — If you realized a gain on the sale of your property that was included in your Federal Adjusted Gross Income, A Vermont Income Tax Return must be filed. Deliver the original and one copy of the Property Transfer Tax Return to the town clerk with payment of any tax due. Make checks payable to the Vermont Department of Taxes. The town clerk will forward the original return and payment to the Department of Taxes and retain a copy of the return at the town clerk's office. If the transfer creates a partition or division of land, you must append an Act 250 Disclosure Statement to the town clerk's copy of the Property Transfer Tax Return. The town clerk will acknowledge receipt of the Act 250 Disclosure Statement on the face of the Property Transfer Tax Return. You are not required to file the Act 250 Disclosure Statement with the Department of Taxes. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. Inc. January 21, 1988 Mr. Robert Krebs Krebs and Lansing 199 Main Street Winooski, Vermont 05404 -- Re — G`regory Industrial Park Dear Bob: ,Yi•c,�s � Cyr f ��a� � J I� The owners of Green Tree Park have come to an agreement with Moose Gregory. I asked Moose to authorize you to record the revised plat. Attached is a note from Moose so authorizing you. Thanks for your help. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Richard P. Trudell. RPT/bee Attach. 14 BLAIR PARK ROAD BOX 308, WILLISTON, VBRMONT 05495 (802) 879-633 ���trtrrrrgz�- , KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, 199 Main St. WINOOSKI, VERMONT 05404 (802) 655-3640 TO �dl�lt� CIF or4;%i.�L',nl WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints El Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ LIEUTU( T)IF MASIOINMQ& DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION RE: the following items: Cl Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION V_ -ZLh2 4(' <,r'r THESEAREARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ❑ Approved as submitted b For your use ❑ Approved as noted p As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE _ 19 _ REMARKS A ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints CI PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO PRODUCT 240-2 ees Inc., Groton, Mass. 01471. SIGNED:1 if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. file: .� 10 State of Vermont AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Fish and Game Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Natural Resources Conservation Council April 1, 1986 Mr. C. W. Gregory d/b/a Gregory and Daughters Nob Hill Road Williston, VT 05495 Department of Rater Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 RE: Certificate of Compliance 4CO437 and amendments, Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park, Gregory Drive, So. Burlington. Dear Mr. Gregory: We have received a letter from Robert Krebs dated February 6, 1986 with enclosures including sewer main testing by Aztec Crop., water main pressure test and chlorination by Red Hed Supply, and a letter from C.W. Gregory. Also received was a note dated January 21, 1986 from Keith Barnes of Red Hed Supply regarding the water main testing. The installa- tion of the sewer main and water main was not completed under the super- vision of a professional engineer registered in the State of Vermont as required by Conditions 2 and 3 of the Certificate of Compliance 4Cb437. This certification was to have been completed and accepted by the Division of Protection prior to placing the systems in use. P?e hepe that the information listed below is completed as soon as possible now that snow cover and freezing conditions have ceased. We shall not comment on the acceptability of the submitted testing until the engineer can submit further information on the construction of the systems. (1) The engineer shall submit one set of "as -built" drawings showing the location of the sewer manholes and pump station, rim and invert elevations, evaluation of the pump station including pumps, alarm, controls and dosing settings, storage and grouting, and any noted deficiencies which need to be corrected to bring the construction into compliance with the Environmental Protection Rules and sound engineering practices. The engineer should also note the sewer pipe size and type of material and alignment at the manholes and pump station and look into any questionable construction practices found. If any section of the sewer pipe or manholes is dug up, the engineer is to note the bedding material and repair any sections found not to be in compliance with the specifications. - 1 - 1 Page Two 4CO437 C.W. Gregory (2) The sewer manholes and pump station and force main should be plugged and tested for leakage under the supervision of the engineer. The engineer can require any or all testing to be redone under his supervision as deemed necessary by the engineer or Division of Protection based on further investigation as received by the engineer. (3) Please submit written indication from the Department of Health that the conditions of their Letter of Approval dated March 24, 1980 have been satisfactorily completed. The Division of Protection's approval was based on the construction of the water main extension as being completed in accordance with the Department of Health's letter of approval. This approval required an engineer's inspection during construction and testing and preparation of as -built drawings. This information may require digging up the water main to check the bury depth, bedding material, thrust blocks and pressure and leakage testing in the presence of the engineer. The Division of Protection shall accept the Department of Health's acceptance of the water main construction instead of duplicating their effort. Please note that the buildings in this subdivision are not approved for occupancy until the sewer and water main extensions are accepted by the Divi- sion of Protection. We hope to receive the above information as soon as possible to clear the present violation of the Certificate of Compliance. The Division of Pro- tection shall not accept any further amendment applications for develop- ment of any lots or additions on approved lots until this matter is satisfactorily resolved. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, /% . �- Mary� K�Clark Assistant Regional Engineer cc: Krebs and Lansing Con. Eng. Raymond Stewart j City of So. Burlington ✓ James Dodge Red Hed Supply Aztec Corp. RIVCO Robert and Althea Platt Barry's Transmissions Dept. of Health Dept. of Labor and Industry PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 8, 1980 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, April 8, 1980 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 1175 Williston Road Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; George Mona, Peter Jacob, Robert Walsh, Kirk Woolery, James Ewing Member Absent Ernest Levesque Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Robert Krebs, Meg Lukens, Dave Nicholson, C.W. Gregory Minutes of April 1. 1980 Mr. Mona noted that at the last meeting, he had wanted the words "and noted on the plan of record" added to the second stipulation of the University Mall approval. Although the same phrase was not at that time added also to the first stipulation, Mr. Mona felt it had been the intent of the Commission that the phrase apply..also to the City Planner in stipulation 1. The Commission agreed that that had been their intent, and the words "'and noted on the plan of record" should be added after "City Planner" in stipulation 1 on page 2. Mr. Woolery moved to approve the April 1, 1980 minutes as amended, Mr. Jacob seconded, and all voted aye. Final plat application of Gregory and Daughters for a 6-lot industrial subdivision on a new street to be called Gregory Drive off Williston Road Mr. Robert Krebs said the plan was relatively unchanged from the last meeting. City Manager Szymanski's requests have been incorporated into the plan. Water and sewer will be provided for all 6 lots and a new right turn lane will be added on Williston Road. The state has reviewed the plan, as has Traffic Engineering Associates (see attached copy of that report. The maximum amount of traffic anticipated at this intersection is 9,% of its total capacity, Mr. Krebs told the commission. A sign prohibiting left turns out of the development will be posted. Mr. Mona felt that would be totally unenforceable. It was noted that a large truck could go straight into the street opposite this development in case of an emergency (a car coming over the hill while the truck blocked several lanes). It was felt that No Left Turn signs would be ignored. The possibility of a traffic light at the intersection was discussed. Mr. Krebs stated that if a truck did try to go left up the hill and another car came down the hill, that car could go into the new right turn lane to avoid the truck. It was noted that more vehicles would go toward Burlington than Williston. It was suggested that, at a later time, if there appeared to be a problem here, a light could be studied. Noting that it might be dangerous to have a light on this hill, the commission suggested cutting down the hill, or putting the light at the top of the hill and having it tripped by exiting trucks. Mr. Krebs noted that there would be a flashing light 750' before the intersection, and Mr. Gregory added that someday there would be a road for trucks to exit from the development to the rear to Shunpike Road, Kimball Avenue, and then to Kennedy Drive. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 8. 1980 The commission liked that idea. Mr. Poger found Traffic Engineering Associates' report confusing. It stated there might be 125 vehicles for this development at the teak hour, and Mr. Poger felt that was a very high figure. He also wanted to know what the Associates would say about the intersection given the possiba ity that cars would come over the hill, not at the posted 40 mph speed, but at 45 or 50mph. He wanted to know how fast a car could come over the hill and still have good sight -distance. Mr. Poger suggested reviewing traffic again after a few of these lots had been developed. Mr. Gregory said Green Mountain Power had given permission to move its poles if he needs more room to build on lot 4. Mr. David Nicholson represented Mrs. DeLeclair, the neighbor to the east,of the property. She is concerned about drainage. It was noted that there would be catch basins for water, as well as a ditch from the turnaround to the brook and a natural ditch along the property line of the two lots. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the fin_.l�l_at application of Gregory and Daughters for a 6 lot industrial subdivision on a new street called Gregory Drive off Williston Road as depicted on a plan and attached drawings entitled "Final Plan, Gregory and Daughters, Industrial Park,"prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers and dated February 1980, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Driveway entrances to lots 3 and 4 shall be located so as to be compatible with the future right of way to the RDR property. Front -yard setbacks shall also conform to the proposed right of way. 2. Lot 3, which may be bisected by a future road, is approved as one building lot only. 3. Upon development of the RDR property to the west, the Planning Commission shall review the need for a street connection to be provided by the subsequent developer to the Gregory Drive cul-de-sac. 4. The following revisions in construction and -site details shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer and shall be incorporated into the final map submission: (a) Addition of a curb cut and pull -off area adjacent to the pumping station large enough to accomodate a service truck, (b) Water service to the pumping station. (c) Catch basin grates of type Neenah R3405-R or equivalent. 5. _If any portion of the subdivision is served by three-phase power, that type of Dower shall also be provided to the pumping station. 6. The existing fire hydrant at Williston Road shall be relocated as srproved by the Fire Chief and the new location shall be indicated on the final map submision. 7. Sewer capacity for the industrial park has been estimated at 15 00 to 2000 gallons per day for the purpose of sizing the pumping station. Each lot's allocation of the Airport treatment plant capacity shall be made at the time of site plan review. 3• PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 8, 1980 8. Bonding for all public improvements shall be arranged prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the subdivision. The statement "easements and roads to be dedicated as required" on page 1 of 4 shall be deleted. 9. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days. 10. The City Planner shall review the traffic resulting from this industrial park after the development of 4 lots and report his findings to the Planning Commission. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion. The Commission requested that the stop line for exiting traffic from the development be moved closer to the road so exiting cars could see if traffic was coming down the hill. It was noted that, if the Commission did not find the traffic conditions "*-; acceptable after 4 lots are developed, at the site -plan reviews of lots 5 and 6 approval could be withheld until the conditions are brought up to par. That may involve some expense to the city or Mr. Gregory. The motion carried without dissent. Continuation of public hearing on application by the Glenwood Corroration Mery Brown for Revised Final Plat approval for cluster J 20 units of phase 2 of the Stonehedge development Mr. Spitz said the applicant had requested that this item be postponed. Since neither the applicant, nor the neighbors, who had been told that there would be a postponement of the hearing, were present, Mr. Spitz did not feel the Commission should have a lengthy discussion of the item. He told the board that the two questions raised at previous meetings had been answered by the City Attorney, in his 2/7 memo. The Commission noted that the letter stated that the entire PUD should be reviewed anew if the alterations would have a significant adverse effect on the character of the PUD, and if the Commission could articulate the ways in which it would do this. Discussion centered on the meaning of the word "character" in this case. The residents of the area feel that the alteration would profoundly affect the character of the area. Mr. Mona felt the concern of the residents was for what the new units would do to those already there. Mr. Walsh felt that the Commission should review the plan with a view to conserving the value of the existing buildings, because he felt that was the intent of the statutes (Vermont Planning and Development Act). Mr. Jacob felt that if the residents had complaints, their recourse was to the courts, particularly if what had been represented to them was being violated. The Commission discussed whether the proposed change was drastic or not. Mr. Woolery had some concerns about allowing units in phase 2 to be constructed before phase 1 was completed. The Commission, if it approved the. change for phase 2, did not want to have units in phase 1 altered. Mr. Mona did not want to approve any change unless he had a clear picture of what would happen to the units other than in cluster J, in both phase 1 and 2. Mr. Spitz felt this discussion should continue when the applicant and neighbors were present, but Xr. Mona felt that no decision would be made tonight and Messrs. Jacob and Ewing felt this discussion was to help them straighten things out in their own minds. Mr. Woolery moved to continue the public hearing for the application by City Hall. Kr. Mona seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 4/4/80 2) Gregory & Daughters 1. Lot P4 does not have a sewer connection. If it is to be sewerd the six inch sewer is considered a main and must be 8 inch. 2. Pumping station shall have a paved access drive with a parking area. 3. Water service should be provided to the sewage pumping station. 4. Pumping station should be three phase power. 5. Pumping station should have a built-in ladder. 6. Catch basin grates shall be Neenah R3405-R or equal. 3) Stonehedge, Cluster J Before additional housing units are diverted to the Laural Hill sewer than were originally planned (92 units) I would recommend that the critical area as defined in the Paulson report of 10-11-72 be regauged after all the units in Phase I are built and occupied. The gauging done by Webster -Martin 6-22-78 indicated 139 units can be added, however, certain assumptions were made and a check would confirm these assumptions. In the southeasterly directionjtheAndrews Avenue -Imperial Drive sewer critical length is near Shelburne Road (Paulson Report 10-26-72) where 13 add- itional units were estimated. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: April 4, 1980 2) Gregory Industrial Park Preliminary plat stipulations have been met: (1) water system has been approved, (2) cul-de-sac has been redesigned, and (5)legal documents have b6en submitted for City Attorney's review. Since Preliminary plat)road improvements at the intersection with Williston Road have been designed (see attached report summary). One new lane will be constructed, and another lane will be provided via restriping. There will be a no left turn sign for trucks exiting Gregory Drive. One hydrant must be relocated and approved by the City Fire Chief. 3) Stonehedge, Cluster J All -Phase I construction and improvements to date - including building locations, foundations, and landscaping - are in compliance with approved plans and stipulations on file in the City records. Legal questions have also been resolved and the City Attorney is providing written responses. Sewage disposal for cluster J is being redirected to the southeast as per the November approval. After reviewing all the questions that have been raised regarding this application, some relevant to the Planning Commission's jurisdiction and some not, I can find no instance in which the applicant has not lived up to the requirements made or revisions requested by the Planning Commission. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Gregory & Daughters, Industrial Park Date: November 14, 1979 Comments regarding sketch plan #1 Lots 1, 2, 4 and 5 conform to the minimum lot size required within the Industrial District. #2 Lots 3 and 6 do not conform. See opinion of Attorney W.G. Livingston dated November 9, 1979, this office requested this opinion prior to review by the Planning Commission in order to avoid any problems regarding the lot lay out as proposed. #3 City sub -division regulations prohibit dead-end streets, a cul-de-sac constructed to City standards is required. #4 The new street as proposed will require the approval of the State Highway Department. #5 Curb cuts for lots 1 and 6 should be located off the new proposed street. #6 On site sewer disposal is required. City sewer facilities not available to this site. All tests (percolation and boring) should be taken before the ground freezes. State division of Vermont Permit CASE. NO. EC-4-1358 APPLICANT Crawford & Judith Gregory ADDRESS Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 and W.G. Russell Supply Corp. 1025 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05401 and Bruce P. Barry 20 Landing Avenue Colchester, VT 05446 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES Chapter 3, Subdivisions This project, consisting of boundary line changes to previously aproved Lot 3 (50,599 square feet); Lot 4 (125,060 square feet); and Lot 5 (89,724 square feet) of Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park on Gregory Drive, in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4C0437-. GENERAL (1) This permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans "Final Plan, Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park" dated February 1980 last revised 7/20/87 prepared by Robert Krebs, P.E., Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (3) Each prospective purchaser of each lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior. to conveyance of the lot. (4) The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for recording this permit and "Notice of Permit Recording" in the South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. Crawford & Judith Gregory EC-4-1358 Page 2 (5) All conditions set forth in Certification of Compliance #4C0437 and amendments shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. Patrick A. Parenteau, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation a By Mary K. C ark ' Assistant Regional Engineer Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 29th day of December, 1988. cc: Donald Robisky Town Planning Commission f Louis Borie Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Krebs & Lansing Paradis, Coombs, and Fitzpatrick W.G. Russell Supply Corp. Bruce P. Barry State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Natural Resources Conservation Council Crawford W. & Judith T Gregory Nob Hill Williston, Vermont 05495 RE: EC-4-1358 Gregory & Daughters Ind. Park Changed location of Gregory Dr and lot lines of Lots 3, 4 & 5 Amends 4C0437. Greetings: /S AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 December '412, 1988 We received your completed application for the referenced permit on December 16, 1988, including a fee of $25. This application falls under the Multi -Lot Subdivision Program area, and under the Performance Standards for this program area, we have a maximum of 45 days of 'in-house' time for our review of ,your application. Based upon the present workload, we anticipate review of your project within the next 3-4 weeks. If' we need further information from you in order to reach a decision on your application, the time we wait for your submittal of that information does not count against the allowable in-house time specified in the performance standards. If' you have any questions about the review process, or if ,you have not received a decision on your application within the permitted time of 45 days in-house, please contact: this office at 879-6563. S*ncerely, \N v Ern C i ti.anson egional Enginf er c. South Burlington Planning Commission '—S-3 e ors U H- S, AA dt, 4 Aw" tFIZZ11,41, 1 t — _tr Z& -5--o j" , 1+ - a - CA 94 a5llL UWU- 3 q 6 A PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on 'Tuesday, April 8 , 1980. at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following: Final plat application of Gregory and Daughters for a 6—lot industrial subdivision on a new street to be called Gregory Drive off of Williston Road. The proposed_ subdivision is bounded by Muddy Brook to the south, RDR Enterprises and W. Szvmanski to the west, Williston Road to the north, and deLeClerc to the east. Copies of the are available inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. for public ins Sidney B. Poger Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission March 22 19$-Q—_ — C I _ _) OF SOUTH BURL INGTON i Z,1Igd Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT I Name of Applicant C. W. Gregory, Nob Hill Road, Williston, Vermont OS49S II Name of Subdivision -'Gregory $ Daughters Industrial Park III Indicate any changes,to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, sur- veyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application: Land has been transferred from Dr. Harold Brown to Mr. C. W. Gregory (now owner and applicant). IV Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application Lots have been modified somewhat to accomodate'a new cul-de-sac as required by W. Syzmanski, City Manager. V Attach a final plat drawing (originals not needed) showing the following information: (1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title, the name and address of the record owner and subdivider, the name, license number and seal of the licensed land surveyor, the boundaries of the subdivision and its general location in relation to existing streets or other land marks, scale (numerical and graphic), date and true north arrow. (2) Street names and lines, pedestrial ways, lots, reservations, easements, and areas to be dedicated to public use. (3) Sufficient data acceptable to the City Engineer to determine readily the location, bearing and length of every street line, lot line, boudary line and to reproduce such lines upon the ground. 'Where applicable these should be tied to reference points previously established by the city. -2- (4) The length of all straight lines, the deflection angles, radii, length of curves and central angles of all curves, tangent distances and tangent bearings for each street. (5) By property designation on such Plat, all public space for which offers of cession are made by the subdivider and those spaces title to :ahien is reserved by him. (6) Lots within the subdivision numbered in numerical orcer within blocks, and bloc?Ks lettered in alphabetical order. (7) The location of all of the i��:,prove_«znts referred -'Co in Section 301.1-tand in adcit_on thereto the location of all utility poles, se: -.-age disposal systems, ,:rater supply Systems and rough grading and other cevices and methods of draining the area affecting the subc"ivision. 5+ (8) Permanent reference monu_-zents sho-.,-n thus: and lot corner :na rher s shown thus: "0" . (9) Construction drawings of all :_-eauired i==rurove;-iients. VI Enclose supporting documents listed below or request that they be reauiree as a conCition of final plat approval: (1) Copies of proposed seeds, agreements or other documants showing the manner in which open space, including park and recreational areas and school site areas, are to be dedicated, reserved and maintained and a certificate of the City Attorney that these documents are satisfactory. (2) A certificate of the City :Inigineer as to the satisfactory completion of all improvements required by the Co.-TrAs Sion, or, in lieu of any required L-aprovements not so completed, a performance bond to secure completion of such improvements and their l-naintenance for a period of two years, and written evidence that the Citv Council is satisfied either with the bonding or surety company or with security furnished by the subdivider. (3) A copy of such covenants or dead restrictions as are in- tended to cover all or part of the tract. (4) A prospectus describing the management organization if one is required. (5) In the case of a subdivision or development served by a privately owned and/or maintained street: - (a) a copy of all proposed deep's, agreements, or other documents which convey or relate to the use of a privately owned street or right-of-way, and a certi- fic,-te of the City Attorney that these documents are satisfactory. -3- (b) a completed contract between the lanao;mer and the city regarding the number of lots or dwelling units to be served by the proposed right-of-way or private street and the responsibility for the roadway imaint- enance, along with a certificate of the Ci'�;r 'ttorney that the contract is satisfactory. it), L) a A� (sicrature a nlicent r contact pe son f czte ' 1 1 ) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1) Name �-bf Applicant Gregory & Daughters 2) Name of Subdivision Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park 3) Describe Subdivision (i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, include gross floor area if comm- ercial.) It is a proposed 6 lot industrial subdivision on 13.14 acres of land. 4) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record,applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: N.A. 5. Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer Robert C. Krebs, Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Shelburne Road, Shelburne, Vermont Tel: 98S-2827 Y_ b. Surveyor Robert C. Krebs, Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Same as above _ C. Attorney Al Overton, 3 Main Street, Essex Junction, Vermont Tel: 878-3346 d. Plnt D es i^ n er Robert C. Krebs, Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Same as above -a- 6) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since this proposal was last before the Commission: N.A. 7) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all cont- Madeline deLeClerc, Williston Rd., South Burlington, Vt. igous properties: _ W. Syzmanski, Williston Rd., South Burlington, Vt. RDR Enterprises, Williston Rd., South Burlington, Vt. Arthur Rock, Modern Septic Tank, Shunpike Rd., Williston, Vt. Eugene Morrissey, Wright & Morrissey, 346 Shelburne St., Burlington, Vt. 8) State title, drawing number, date of, origi�F1 plus any revisions, t and designer(s) of the preliminary inap(s) accompanying this appli- cation: Preliminary Plan January 1980 Details January 1980 9) attach a preliminary map showing the following information: 1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the city. 2) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. 3) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. 4) The names of all subdivisions immediately adjacent and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. 5) The location and size of any existing sewers and z�:.Tater mains, culverts and reins on the property or serving the property to be subdivided. 6) Location, names and widths of existing, and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks r -3- and other public or privately maintained,open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. 7) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of proposed finished grades where change of existing ground elevation will be five feet or more. 8) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. 9) Numerical and graphic scale, crate and true north arrow. 10) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative mans of providing water supply to the proposed subdivision. 11) Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provision for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 12) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface toil, rock and ground eater conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results of percolation tests. 13) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. 14) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culverts which may be required. 15) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Connission to locate readily and appraise the basic lay- out in the field. Unless an existing street intersection is shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. 15) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 10) Developmental timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates) Start Spring 1980 - Completion Fall 1980 11) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: -4- 12) Attach a vicinity map showing the following: 1) All existing subdivisions, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the record owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street ad- joining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existingIfiled or proposed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system end an indication of the -future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the sub - divider's entire holding. ature nol' ant or- ct person date State of Vermont i 6 LAND USE PERMIT CASE No. #4C0437-1 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT Crawford W. Gregory 10 VSA, Chapter(Act 250 ADDRESS & Judith T. Gregory d/b/a Gregory and Daughters Nob Hill Road Williston, Vt. 05495 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 VSA, Chapter 151. This permit applies to the lands identified in Book 158, Page 234 of the Land Records of South Burlington Vermont as the subject of a deed to Crawford W. & Judith T. Gregory, the"per- mittees" as grantee. This permit specifically authorizes the permittees to ex- tend the construction completion date to October 15, 1982. The permittees, their assigns and successors in interest are obligated by this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0437 except as amended herein. 1. The permittees shall comply with Exhibits #37, 38 and 39 (plan sheets 2,3 & 4 of 4, revised June 25, 1980) for erosion control. Hay bale dams shall be in- stalled as depicted on the plans within 24 hours of grading of any road slopes, ditches and installation of the catch basins. The permittees shall also stake hay bales or a silt fence at the outlet of the swale from the existing 18" cul- vert under Route #2 into Muddy Brook prior to regrading and rip -rapping the Swale. All disturbed areas of the site shall be seeded with permanent seed as recommended by the Soil Conservation Service no later than October 1, 1981 or with dormant seed between I!ovember and December 1, 1981. All disturbed areas must be seeded by either method no later than December 1, 1981. Immediately after seeding, mulch shall be applied and tied down with either twine or netting and shall be maintained until vegetation is established. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control, and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to per- manent and temporary erosion controls as they deem necessary. Permanent con- trols include but are not limited to the rip -rapped outfalls into Muddy Brook. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 28th day of September 1981. Members participating in this decision: Charles Tetzlaff Helen Lawrence Edward- R. Schlegel , Di''` ri ct Coordinator for the District #4 Commission STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION #4 Gregory & Daughters ) Amendment Application #4CO437-1 Nob Hill Road ) Findings of Fact and Williston, Vermont ) Conclusions of Law 10 VSA, Chapter 151 (Act 250) On July 30, 1981, an amendment application for an Act 250 permit was filed by C. W. Gregory, Nob Hill Road, Williston, Vermont, for a project generally des- cribed as the extension of the construction completion date of Land Use Permit #4CO437 to October 15, 1982. Under Al 250, projects are reviewed based on the 10 environmental criteria of 10 VSA, 6086(a) 1-10. Before granting a permit, the Board or District Com- mission must find that the project complies with these criteria and is not detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. Decisions must be stated in the form of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The facts we have relied upon are contained in the documents on file identified as Exhibits 1 through 4. No adverse comments have been filed by any party. Parties to this application are the same as for the original ap- plication, #4CO437. In making the following findings, we have summarized the statutory language of criteria 4 of 10 VSA, 6086(a), the only criterion affected by this amendment. (Our findings under criteria 1-3, 5-10, Findings of Fact #4CO437, dated July 1, 1980 remain unchanged by this amendment). 4. There will be unreasonable soil erosion or effects on the capacity of the land to hold water: Temporary soil erosion controls are the same as for Land Use Permit #4CO43 and are depicted on Exhibits #37, 38 and 39 of that permit. They consist o hay bales around catch basins, along the toe of the fill slope for the roa and at the outlet of the discharge swales into Muddy Brook. Permanent erosion controls consist of a rip -rapped ditch from the cul-de-sac to the Brook and a 15' rip -rapped section of the outfall from the culvert under Route #2. CONCLUSION OF LAW Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, it is the conclusion of this Dis- trict Environmental Commission that the project described in the application referred to above, if completed and maintained in conformance with all of the terms and conditions of that application, and of Land Use Permit #4CO437-1, will not cause or result in a detriment to publi health, safety or general welfare under the criteria described in 10 VSA, 4 086(a) and that, pursuant to such section, a permit is therefore issued. 4CO437-1 FINDINGS OF FACT Page 2 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 28th day of September, 1981. Members participating in BY this decision: Edward R. Schlegel,District Coordin r For the Dist Charles Commission Charles Tetzlaff Helen Lawrence CASE No. 4C0437 APPLICANT Crawford ?P. Gregory and ADDRESS Judith T. Gregory d/b/a Gregory and Daughters Nob Hill Road tVilliston, VT 05495 State of Vermont RER`/VE LAND "Cr PERMIT _2 1980 C MY SOSR /n?G , �N LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED j10 VSA, Chapter 151 (Act 250) and Vermont.,State Board of Health Regulations, Chapter 5, Sanitary Engineering, Subchapter 10, Part I, Subdivisions District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 VSA, Chapter 151. This permit applies to the lands identified in Book 155, Page 234 of the Land Records of South Burling- ton, Vermont, as the subject *of a deed to Crawford 11. f Judith T. Gregory, the "permittees" as grantees. This permit specifically authorizes the permittees to subdivide six (6) industrial lots and to construct 850' of roads and asso- ciated water, sewer, and storm sewer lines off of Route 2 in South Burlington, Vermont. This project also includes a deceleration lane along Route 2. The permittees, their assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to corrolete and maintain the project only as approved by t'Ze District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. The project shall be completed as set forth in Findings of Facts and Con - elusions of Law #4C0437, in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Approved" and on file with the District Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of t'.iis permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the District Environmental Cornis s ion . 2. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit �,rit}�out appeal, the permit - tees confirm and agree for themselves and all assigns and successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land the land uses Herein permitted, and will be bindin; upon and enforceable against the permittees and all assigns and successors in interest. 3. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Certification of Compliance #4C0437, issued on June 27, 1980, by the Regional Engineer, Division of Protection, Agency of Environmental Conservation in compliance with Vermont State 'Board of Health Regulations, Chapter 5, Sanitary Engin- eering, Subchapter 10, Part I, Subdivisions. Conditions #3 & #4 of said Certification are as follows: 3) All lots are approved for the disposal of wastewater into the City of South Burlington's rmmicipal sewer system provided: (A) The construction of the sewer, force main, and piff ming station are completed under the supervision of a professional engineer regis- tered in the State of Vermont. (B) Prior to the installation of the pum ring station, a professional engineer must submit plans and calculations to verify that there Land Use Permit 1 #4Cv437 I Page 2 shall be a minimum of 4 hour storage of wastewater above the second pump on level. This plan is also to include the proposed route for the pressure line from the pimp station to the existing manhole in Route 2. (C) Upon completion of construction, and prior to placing the system into ser- vice, the supervising engineer is to make written certification to the Agency of Environmental Conservation, Division of Protection, stating that all work was completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans. The certifica- tion is to include the results of the infiltration/exfiltration testing as specified on the stamped approved plans. 4) No construction of a structure which would be defined by the Vermont Health Re- gulations as a public building is authorized on any lot until complete interior plans have been submitted to the Agency of Environmental Conservation. 4. The District Environmental Commission maintains that continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed in accordance with the terms of the permit. S. The permittees and all assigns and successors in interest shall install and maintain water -conserving plumbing fixtures in all buildings, including but not limited to low -flush toilets, low -flow showerheads, and aerator -type or flow -restricted faucets. Any leases for said buildings shall require the maintenance of the same. 6. All heated structures erected on lots approved herein shall comply with the then cur- rent guidelines of the Vermont Energy Office when the structure is built. 7. The permittees and all assigns and successors in interest including all lot purchasers shall continually maintain the landscaping substantially as approved in Exhibits #18 & #26 by replacing any dead or diseased plantings as soon as seasonably possible. The permittees shall amend the Protective Covenants, Section 8, to incorporate all requirements of this condition prior to the sale of the first lot. 8. The permittees shall comply with Exhibits #37, #38, & #39 (plan sheets 2, 3, & 4 of 4, revised June 25, 1980) for erosion control. Hay hale dams shall be installed as depicted on the plans within 24 hours of grading of any road slopes, ditches, and installation of the catch basins. The permittees shall also stake hay bales or a silt fence at the outlet of the Swale from the existing 18" culvert under Route 2 into Muddy Brook prior to regrading and rip -rapping the Swale. From October IS to April 1S of any calendar year, all non -vegetated disturbed areas of the construction site shall be mulched until final vegetative cover is established. All erosion control de- vices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced, and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control, and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to permanent and temporary erosion controls, as they deem necessary. Permanent controls include but are not limited to the rip -rapped outfalls into ?Muddy Brook. All site construction shall be stabilized as set forth above by October 1S, 1980. Land Use Permit #4CO437 Page 3 9. All outdoor lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view substantially beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 10. Each prospective purchaser of any lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot Plan and the Land Use Permit before any written contract of sale is entered into. 11. No further subdivision or consolidation of any parcels of land approved herein shall be permitted without the written approval of the District Fnvironmental Commission. 12. The permittees shall reference the requirements and conditions imposed by Land Use Permit #4C0437 in all deeds to said lots. 13. The Commission approval of the Protective Covenants is limited to Article III, Sections #4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, F, 11. (Exhibit #18) Article III, Sec- tion #8 shall be amended to require the replacement of any dead, dying, or diseased Plantings. 14. The permittees`shall submit a design for the entrance sign to the District Commission for approval prior to installation, and shall construct the pro- ject in accordance with those plans as approved. 15. The permittees shall immediately notify the State Archeologist if any arti- facts are uncovered during construction and shall allow the archeologist time to inspect the site. 16. The permittees shall apply and maintain calcium chloride or water on all roadways within the project during construction and until paved to control dust. 17. Prior to the commencement of any construction on any of the 6 industrial lots, except for improvements specifically permitted herein, the purchasers or lessees of said lots shall apply to become co-permittees to Land Use Permit #4C0437 by requesting a permit amendment. The District Commission will evaluate amendment requests and may impose conditions with respect to industrial facilities within this park in accordance with the following criteria of Act 250: 1 (air pollution); l(B) (waste disposal g.p.d.); 1 (stonmvater management) ; 1(C) ; 3 (g.p.d.) ; 4; 5 (trips Per day) ; 7; 8; 9(F); and 9(IQ (Lots #4 F, #5). A rebuttable pr` s�tion­exists as a result of this permit that industrial developments in conformance with the permit - tees' overall plans and covenants satisfy the other criteria of Act 250. However, the District Commission reserves the right to review a project under any criteria if it is not consistent with the approved plans or our findings of fact. 18. The permittees shall maintain the conservation zone (100' from the center line of Muddy Brook) in its natural condition, except for the installation of a drainage swale from the cul-de-sac. 19. The permittees shall apply for a Temporary Pollution Permit. Prior to any site construction, including the road, a design for stormwater management for the road must be approved by the Permits Section of Environmental En- Land Use Permit \ 44E0437 Page 4 gineering, Agency of Environmental Conservation. The permittees shall sub- mit a copy of the draft Temporary Pollution Permit and any revised plans resulting from the review to the District Environmental Commission by Sep- tember 1, 1990. 20. All construction on the road and utilities for this project imist he com- pleted by December 1, 1980. 21. This permit shall expire on July 1, 2000, imless extended by the District Commission. 22. Notwithstanding, this permit shall expire one year from date of issuance if the permittees have not demonstrated an intention to proceed i,,ith the pro- ject. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this lst day of July, 1980. Members participating Ry in this decision: Susan H. Cain, District Coordinator Duncan Thrown For the District #4 Commission Helen Lawrence CASE NO. STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION RECEIVED CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Jul ') 7980 MANAGER,, 4CO437 ) Certified to complycW-iFtlioVe6 p ' 5' ate Gregory and Daughters ) Board of Health Regulations, Chapter 5, Nob Hill Road ) Sanitary Engineering, Subchapter 10, Williston ) Part 1, Subdivisions Vermont 05495 This project consisting of a subdivision for six industrial lots, identi- fied as lot 1 thru 6 and ranging in size from 80,089 square feet to 105,030 square feet, located off U.S. Route 2 in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby certified to satisfy the requirements of the regulations named above if the following conditions are met: The subdivision must be completed as shown on sheet 2 of 4 dated January, 1980, revised on February 4, 1980, and June 2, 1980; and sheet 3 of 4 dated January, 1980, revised on February 1, 1980, June 2, 1980, and June 25, 1980 and on sheet 4 of 4 dated January, 1980, and revised on March 6, 1980, June 2, 1980, and June 25, 1980 as prepared by Robert C. Krebs, P.E., and which have been stamped "Approved" by the Division of Protection. No alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where written application has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained. 2. All lots are authorized to obtain potable water from the City of South Burlington's water supply provided the construction of the water mains are completed in accordance with the approval letter issued by the Department of Health to C.W. Gregory dated March 24, 1980. 3. All lots are approved for the disposal of wastewater into the City of South Burlington's municipal sewer system provided: (A) The construction of the sewer, force main, and pumping station are completed under the supervision of a professional engineer registered in the State of Vermont, CBI Prior to the installation of th e pumping station, a professional engineer submit plans and calculations to verify that there shall be a minimum of 4 hour storage of wastewater above the second pump on level. This plan is also to include the proposed route for the pressure line from the pump station to the existing man- hole in Route 2. (C) Upon completion of construction, and prior to placing the system into service, the supervising engineer is to make written certifi- cation to the Agency of Environmental Conservation, Division of 4CO437 Gregory and Daughters Page 2 Protection, stating that all work was completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans. The certification is to include the results of the infiltration/exfiltration testing as specified on the stamped approved plans. 4. No construction of a structure which would be defined by the Vermont Health Regulations as a public building is authorized on any lot until complete interior plans have been submitted to the Agency of Environmental Conservation. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION to Q' Ernest P. Christianson, Regional Engineer EPC/lsw Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 27th day of June, 1980. cc: P. Howard Flanders City of South Burlington l' Robert C. Krebs Susan Cain June 3, 1980 Susan Cain District Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05402 Dear Susan: On April 8, 1980, the South Burlington Planning Ccwdssion granted final approval to Gregory and Daughters for a 6 - lot industrial subdivision off of Williston Road. The project is in conformity with the City`s Comprehensive Man. Sincerely yours, ( avid li. Spitz, City Planner W/Mcg cc: Robert Krebs (Krebs & Lansing) ACT 2S0 NOTICE APPLICATION AND HEARING 10 VSA, 6083-6088 Application #4C0437 was filed by Gregory and Daughters, Nob Hill Road, Williston, Vermont, on May 8, 1990, for the subdivision of six industrial lots and construction of an 800' road and associated utilities, off of Williston Road (Route 2) in South Burlington, Vermont. This project will be evaluated in accordance with the 10 environmental criteria of 10 VSA, §6086(a). Statutory parties to this application are the municipality, the municipal planning commission, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, and affected State agencies. Adjoining pro- perty owners may participate to the extent the proposal will have a direct effect on their property under the 10 criteria. Other persons may parti- cipate at the discretion of the District Commission. If you wish to par- ticipate, please contact the Coordinator for further information before the first hearing or date as specified below. A public hearing is scheduled for Monday, May 26, 1980, at 3 PM at the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, 58 Pearl Street, Essex Junction. BY Susan 11. Cain, District Coordinator 111 [Vest Street, Essex Junction 879-6563 May 8, 1980 a STATE OF IPA 7 MONT INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION RE: Gregory and Daughters ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION IV South Burlington, ) Vermont ) APPLICATION NUMBER 4co437 MAY 21, 1980 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Environmental Conservation, State of Vermont in the above captioned matter. PRE -HEARING COMMENTS This project is for a proposed industrial park. Although the park is small, the Interagency Act 250 Review Committee would prefer to see the application processed as though it were for an umbrella permit. An umbrella, permit - type application could include information about the types of industries planned or expected to locate in the park; controls which would apply to those industries, such as.covenants regarding numbers of employees; amount of wastewater flows from each; erosion control during construction on each site; uniform landscaping and signing; and the like. The type of application submitted here is difficult to evaluate because the real impact of the park is impossible to estimate based on the information offered. The Interagency Act 250 Review Committee identified the following concerns with regard to the application: Erosion Control. A memorandum of review regarding erosion control is enclosed. Impact on Highways. Enclosed is information from the Agency of Transportation in this regard. Interagency Act 250 Review Committee request the District Commission impose a condition in a permit, if a permit is issued in this matter, making it clear that individual purchases will be required to go through complete reviews with regard to all of the ten criteria of Act 250 as lots are sold. Respectfully submitted, STATE OF VERMONT INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION BY: Stephen B. Sease, Administrator Land Use and Development State of Vermont Department of Fish and Game Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Water Resources Division of Environmental Engineering Division of Environmental Protection Natural Resources Conservation Council MEMORANDUM AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Montpelier, Vermont 05602 DIVISION OF PROTECTION May 19, 1980 TO: Stephen B. Sease, Administrator Land Use & Development ( FROM: Dennis Bryer, Assistant Regional Engineer V f, �l) SUBJECT: 4CO437 Gregory & Daughters Subdivision/South Burlington I have reviewed the plans for the referenced project for erosion and sedimentation control and the following information should be required.: 1. Calculations of the runoff to be handled on the site should be submitted along with information on the soil type on the site. 2. Calculations should be submitted demonstrating that the proposed drainage ditch to Muddy Brook, and storm drains, and existing culvert under the Williston Road are adequately sized and designed to handle the expected runoff from the site for a design storm and to control velocites, on the drainage area, slope and soil type. 3. Indicate where the hay bale erosion check shown on Sheet 4 of 4 are to be implemented. 4. Temporary sediment traps should be provided around the catch basins. 5. The limits of cuts and fills for the access road should indicate on the plans and cross sections of the road every 50 feet should be prepared and submitted. 3 Page 2 Stephen B. Sease May 19, 1980 (Gregory & Daughters subdivision) 6. Indicate the consturction sequence and schedule to bc- followed. The construction sequence should be very specific and is an intragal part of the erosion control plan. All disturbed areas should be seeded and mulched as soon as possible and no disturbed areas should remain exposed after October lst. Site work should not commence prior to May 1st. e Q��N"C AGF� "'I'SPORA � STATE OI' VERMONI' OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY MAY 9 �gs 133 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05602 May 15, 1980 Act 250 Administrator Agency of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Protection Montpelier, Vermont 05602 NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL DISTRICT Re: App. #4CO437, Gregory & Daughters, South Burlington Dear Sir: Pursuant to the provisions of Act 250 of the 1970 Legislature, Environmental Board and District.Commissions, the Agency of Trans- portation has reviewed the above -referenced Notice and offers the following: L—J No adverse comment JOur comments are as follows: Access permit to Route US 2 will be required from the Agency of Transportation. Developer has tentative approval for this access. Sincerely, Ronald E. W. Crisman Secretary By: S. J. Gage Director of Engineering and Construction Attach. cc: District Transportation Administrator J. Wood r9 X April 14, 1980 C.W. Gregory Nob Hill Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Dear Mr. Gregory, Enclosed is a copy of the Planning Commission's approval and stipulations for your 6-lot industrial park. Before obtaining any building permits you should address all the stiuplations plus the items listed below. 1) After making required changes in the final plans, submit one entire set to this office plus 1 copy of survey for the assessor. 2) Deliver all final legal documents to this office. 3) Arrange for bonding for all public improvements. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, David h. Spitz, City Planner DS/mcg 2 Enc1 cc: Robert Krebs GREEN MOUNTAIN DOWER CORPORATION P.O. Box 486 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE, MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05602 802/223-5235 March ?! 1080 Mr_. Robert C. Krebs Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Mr. Krebs: This is in reply to your letter of March 19, 1980 concerning the Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park in South Burlington. As the roadways are laid out on "Final Plan , Gregory &Daughters Industrial Park" dated February of 1980, Green. Mountain Power (GMP) would allow said roadways provided a minimum ground clearance of 24 .feet from the overhead electrical conductors is maintained and provided a License Agreement is signed by both the property owners and GMP. This agreement is standard procedure for joint usage of right-of-way areas and will stipulate what will be allowed for the protection of both parties. This will be drafted and sent to you shortly for execution on behalf of the property owners. Very truly yours, GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION f 4rfe C. Ellison Manager of Real Estate BCE/orf (�J City of South Burlington 1175 WILLISTON ROAD f SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 `` ,,,•'' TEL.863-2891 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER WILLIAM J. SZYMANSKI March 5, 1980 District #4, Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Attn: Susan Cain: Re: Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park South Burlington, Vermont Dear Susan: The above referenced project will be connected to the municipal sewer and water system which is adequate to handle this development. Construction will be in accord- ance with city standards. Very tru y y rs, ..w -j- _ 4 William J. Szymanski City Manager WJS/b cc: Robert Krebs ®d • KREBS & LAB SING CONSULTING 'ENGINEERS, INC. SHELBURNE ROAD, SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 (802) 985-2827 March 3, 1980 Mr. David Spitz South Burlington Planning Commission Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Spitz: Attached is the application and supporting documents for Final Plat for Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park on Williston Road. If there are any questions which may be resolved prior to the Commission meeting, please contact our office. The applicant is requesting that any additional docu- ments required as part of PART VI of the final application be a condition of approval. Very truly yours, 16 f Robert C. Krebs RCK/shl Enclosure: cc: C. W. Gregory Civil and Sanitary Engineering Surveying Land Development and Subdivisions M s � % y 1 jot, �r • r � � � ,( Xex � + ,S a a �#� �{ x 7A7l t ys° �i � P x e r ^� r �' �. 4• L„ f r„ �s�??it 3 x ,r tS'•+h, of x.Fb J 0 °t°r+ d�` t � 1 ��� r I�,,{4 > � s� �y �(� n rC vs tP X t s Won.—� ', yy �t S '+ si rRt 'i' fill ,t 7 v t ty� ++;3 y tofu i yp .. 4a f � v �� •y,` x r 7��� N �C 0 1 WON 4 x, s x r,# 1� v ; 1E s s $, + b y atr rc t rJ+ t tgo {Pt� 0 x1 W . h� +.4M f k t�4 h ka < .� t � 7f +"�� � i �K I{fit ' s � fAI r Y�r ( . ,� IDS k ➢ it i f i 4 1't1 ,�� ix9 s ay+ P' sy y t Mi �t� �� } (�y,1 t, ? 4 fit v1W B5+u it ati4 � 401 QUEEN C17Y PARK ROAD eo BURL! NG10PJ,v[RNION705401 February�11 1980 y Mr. Robert Krebs r Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Shelburne,- Vermo.i t. 05 32 �t� S `F} al .� :+u Y,'�a',`� p 'M• -sue ty + r� Re: Proposed Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park, SouLl) ° Burlington. �� � i y Y A VQ Deal P�r�, Krebs;AAAa4 4 s In response To your request for confirmation of Champlain tiler- ter District capability to supply water at the -referenced' proposed development we submit the following: 1. Champlain Water. District presently supplies water to the City of South Burlington via a 24" transmission main connecting into the South Burlington system. 2. Adequate fire protection for the referenced portion of F 'the city is maintained by 1.5 million " gallon water storage tank, located off Dorset, Street and maintained by:'.Champlain 'Water. District. ayx+ff�^ A"+ ��'+r.�+:fl�r��,'SI+� s+"�rmY r, ,1w ri ,+'�, y�s✓;.f. ( Ir ir'ta4 EMIRS 3. The additional demand of your~ proposed project '(your �� an,�� � �`� '�� estimated 1, 500 g. p. d.) at this location would not rest:r.ict n t �* `'_,1,1 �I f � nor F]`1tY"P or -present water consu:Y°iers on the C aTrr jai n ta7:a o r! �S t rs District Supply� 5 f e further n c r 4�.�®R��. Ia_" you-h%l�Ic� .�'1.1.1' ihr..r c�l.�l..�t�fJir��, b�E'�1`3e' calf ",�.+�L�I x � s Pike "E"4i; �:. Very truly <�ur.� a: CHAMPLA N WATER DIS`.T'RIC"�'� ,V , i'fA 'r/p./�.+ .,,,✓�"' Sdn�Y ''451�"` i!+``Y(fs"{,f+.t�"Ger(�`�1s1 vw ,.4#�`"fi'T�'�4f �'4'a:'4tt M1.,r4i,+i+"t,e�'1 a�> z,.d; `C .++.x '��to ^^+ r �;dward `PlAke General spnager to/dl now A. No Text 2. PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 1980 1. The northerly entrance to the easternmost cluster shall be aligned with the entrance to the opposite cluster or removed. 2. The gravel turnaround shall be enlarged to accomodate City maintenance and other emergency vehicles. 3. Sidewalks shall be located at least 4 feet from the street and easements shall be provided whenever sidewalks are located outside of the street right-of-way. 4. The developer shall connect the street and sidewalk to the existing Twin Oaks street and sidewalk. 5. U on development of the property to the east, the subsequent developer shall connect to the terminus point of the road and sidewalk as depicted on the plat for the O'Brien Timberlane development. _ f 6. Construction of units shall be phased over at least a 30 month period with no more than 48 units constructed in anyven year. gie %. Complete survey data of the tract boundaries shall be submitted for final plat review. 8. Street names shall be submitted for final plat review. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion and a discussion followed. Mr. O'Brien stated that stipulation 6 gave them enough flexibility. Mr. Walsh asked about esthetics and was told that they planned to save every tree they could on the lot. Mr. Lamphere said the developer would maintain the gravel road. The motion passed unanimously. Public hearing on preliminary plat application of Gregory and Daughters for a 6 lot industrial subdivision off Williston Road Mr. Robert Krebs represented Mr. Gregory and said a few small changes had been made to the plan. The road is about 100' shorter and the area will be served by public water and sewer, since the soil is marginal. There will have to be a small pump station. There is a 12" water line along Williston Road. The access has been designed and shown to the State Agency of Transportation. There will be a new deceleration lane beginning at the top of the hill. The Commission will want to see the specific proposal when it is ready, to determine if it is acceptable -to them, before the project is completed. Mr. Krebs said the City Engineer was thinking about an island in the cul-de- sac for snow storage. The street will be a city street and meet all city standards. Mr. Ewing asked about buildable area on lot 4 and was told there was some, but not much. Mr. Gregory will retain that lot for storage of equipment, or the lines will be moved. Mr. Gregory felt a 5,000 sq. ft. building could be put on the lot. Mr. Ewing noted that if a road were constructed through lot 3 Ayer the easement, it would split that lot and he suggested a stipulation that there not be two lots if that happened. Vr. Ewing moved that the South BurlinEton Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of Gregory and Daughters for a 6 lot industrial park off Williston Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Preliminary Plan. Gregory and Daughters, Industrial Park," prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers and dated January 1980 subject to the following stipulations: 3. PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 1980 1. The water system shall be approved by the City. Water Department 2. The cul-de-sac shall be redesigned to City standards 3. Driveway entrances to lots 3 and 4 shall be located so as to be compatible with the future right -of- wad to the RDR property. Front yard setbacks shall also conform to the proposed right-of-way. 4. Lot 3, which m_a_y be bisected by a future road, is approved as'one building lot only. 5. Road agreements, offers of dedication for the pedestrian easement and pruosed right-of-way, and any other legal documents specified in Section 204.1 (b_) of the subdivision regulations shall be provided for final plat review. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and all voted aye. Site plan review of application by Nordic Ford, Inc for car rental and leasing offices at 1700 Williston Road Mr. Jan Rozendaal said this proposal had been to the City Council and the Zoning Board. It has been an epic struggle, but approval has been granted for the new proposed building to be attached to the car wash. The curb cuts on Williston Road will remain the same, but new curbing will be put in along Airport Road, and there will be two cuts in it. Presently the entire area is open. A fence will probably be erected between this lot and the Parkway Diner. The new building will be 50' x 601. The site is large and Mr. Rozendaal felt there was adequate parking. They do not expect a lot of traffic during the day from this use. There are 4 service bays in the building- Mr. Poger questioned the.parking shown in the middle of the lot. It was noted that the lot was very large, but Mr. Poger recommended putting those spaces_against_the building, rather than in the center of the lot. Mr. Ewing asked about drainage and it was suggested that Mr. Rozendaal consult the City Engineer about what he wanted done. Mr. Ewing moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Nordic Ford, Inc. for a car rental and leasing building at 1700 Williston Road as depicted on a plan entitled 'New 'Rent-A-Car Leas ' Building, Nordic Ford", last revised-1 7 80, subject to the following stivulation 1. The gpplicant shall provide to the City an offer of irrevocable dedication for strip of land 12 feet in width along Williston Road for future road widens 2. The applicant shall provide a landscaping bond of $3,000. 3. Curbing and parking lot drainage shall be as approved by City Engineer William Szymanski. 4. This approval expires 6 months from this date. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Continuation of public hearing on proposed Cl-C2 zoning Mr. Schmucker brought up the question of grandfathering Business Park North from this zoning. Mr. Spitz informed the Commission that the City Attorney does not feel they can grandfather in that fashion. He was not asked whether he felt, because of the Commission's earlier review of the project, that this application ) M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City rianager Re: Next week's agenda items Date: January 18,.1980 #2 O'Brien Property, Timber lane Plan Dated 11/30/79 1. Sidewalk shall have a minimum of 4 feet grass area between road and side- walk. 2. Sidewalk shall have minimum 10 foot radii at sharp turns to facilitate snow plowing. 3. Road openings to the two easterly clusters should be opposite each other. It would be my preference to see the southerly openings eliminated. #3 Gregory & Daughters 1. Soils for on site sewage disposal are marginal. Consideration should be given for pumping facilities. Assuming that the occupants of the lots would not include large volume water users such as bottling plants etc. the estimate of the sewage flow from the site would be approximately 1500 to 2,000 gallons per day. 2. Road gravel should be 18 inches in depth extended one foot beyond the curbs. 3. Sewer pipe bedding shall be 3/8 crushed stone. 4. A city standard cul-de-sac should be constructed at end of street. 5. How about the street named Moose Street or Boulevard? #4 Rent-A-Car Leasing, Nordic Ford. Williston Road 1. Proposed curbs along Airport Road should b�-, one foot minimum from R.O.W. line. Top of constructed curb should be 4 inches above crown of road. Zhis to accomodate future sidewalk. 2. Parking lot shouldinclude storm drain inlets with piping to Williston Road draina; M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: January 18, 1980 #2 O'Brien at Timberlane V, Proposal is essentially the same as that submitted at sketch plan. Tennis courts have been moved out of C.O. zone. Boat storage area has been added. Entrance to clusters on east side of property need to be reworked (per W. Szymanski). Fire chief will accept one entrance to easternmost cluster . Letters have been received from the school and water departments indicating no problems with this project. Phasing of construction, connections to adjacent properties, plus several need to be stipulated. #3 Gregory & Daughters Lots, street, and future right-of-way locations are adequate. Sewage will be pumped to City system, and current plant capacity is sufficient for this project. Deceleration lane will be addto to Williston Road. Application FEE has not been paid. #4 Nordic Ford City Council has approved application, including location of curb cuts, under interim zoning. Zoning Board. has approved front yard variance for locations of building. Curbing is being added along the west and north property lines to improve traffic channelization. 26 parking spaces are indicated which should be sufficient. City regulations do not directly address parking requirements for this type of use so applicant has determined spaces based on own projected need. Fire protection is adequate. Minimum landscaping requirement will be $3,000. Landscaping details have NOT been provided. #5 CI-C2 Zoning All previous changes have been compiled into one draft. Note new changes in Sections 8.002 (motel restaurants), 8.111 (taxi companies), 8.303b. through e. filewording to accomodate PCDs in Cl and C2s), and 8.303g(1) ("nearest" inter- sections). #6 S.E. Quadrant Over 1200 single and multi -family units (exclusive of small projects and over 10 acre lots) on over-300.acres of land have been approved by the Plan- ning Commission during the past 5 years. This type and volume of development may or may not occur over the next 5 years, but sufficient land at medium or s 4. PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 27, 1979 be a good screen in the rear. Mr. Schner said he would be glad to move some of the 33 trees he plans to install to the rear line. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the _site plan application of South Burlington Realty Corporation for a 5,000 square foot commercial building at 60 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a plan entitled "Proposed Building - South Burlington Realty Corporation. Rev. 1772" dated November 1979, subject to the following stipulations:_ 1. Cooperation shall be provided, as deemed necessary by the Planning Commission,. for connecting parking lots and access to the undeveloped lot to the south. 2. The stipulations of William Szymanski's memo, dated November 21, 1979, shall aptly. 3. The stipulations of the Zoning Board shall apples. 4. A landscaping bond of S1,500 shall be provided. 5. This approval expires 6 months from this date. 6. The applicant agrees to put cedars 4-5' high 3' on center across the rear of the property 1 Mr. Mona seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Sketch plan review of application by Homer Dubois for a 1 lot subdivision on Hinesburg Road Mr. Spitz said the proposed lot was 2000' deep and had 200' of frontage. He located the property for the Commission. The Commission felt strongly that it needed to see a plan for the whole area. Kr. Dubois is asking to setoff a 10 acre lot from a parcel of 90 acres and the Commission wanted to know how the rest of the acreage would be used. They do not want spaghetti lots like the one proposed. Possibilities such as running a cul-de-sac road into the center of 'the 90 acres and making lots (square) off that short road were mentioned, as was holding some of that land in-.common,.but the Commission was firm in wanting to see a conceptual plan for the whole parcel. Mr. Jacob felt that 10 acre lots were a waste of land and he recommended looking into ways to set off 5 or even 3 acre lots. It was also pointed out that normally, if there are 5 or more houses on a street, the city has asked that that be a city street. Sketch plan review of application by Gregory and Daughters for 6-lot industrial park across from Muddy Brook Industrial Park on Williston Road 1r. Robert Krebs said that there had been some concern about the original lot layout and that it had been changed so the lots are more uniform. Each lot has the required area, and there is a 60' right of way with a 32' road and a cul- de-sac at the end with an 80' diameter. fey have talked to the State about getting traffic out onto Williston Road. Green Mountain Power has a utility easement over the land and there is a 100' setback from Muddy Brook. At some point the proposed road might be extended to Shunpike P.oad. .'•:r. Gregory might use lot 4 himself for equipxent storage. That lot is tight, but there is some buildable area and the GYP poles could be moved to give them more area. s 5. PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 27, 1 Mr. Gregory said they would have to cut away some of the bank and move that fill to the low side of the lot, so there is a 4:1 slope. Mr. Woolery noted there might be a request to widen the highway at that point. Mr. Spitz said that if the road were extended through, lot 4 would not have adequate building area in South Burlington. They will probably propose a septic system, but they could pump if necessary. Mr. Mona wanted to see the contour lines if the bank was cut. The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 pm. a �e Clerk r ) Memorandum Next Week's Agenda Items 11/21/79 Page 2 #7 Gregory, 6 lot Industrial Park Road. Section 401.1 (7) of the Subdivision Regulations says, "Cul-de-sac streets shall be permitted only in residential districts..." The intent of this section as it may or may not pertain to this development should be considered. Lot layout. City Attorney says that "rat-tail" lot layout is contrary to the intent of the density requirements of the Zoning Regulations. With regularly shaped 80,000 square foot lots applicant could probably create 5 but not 6 lots. However, proposed types of industrial uses may not need 80,00b square feet. &n arrangement such as Morse Tndustrial Park in Essex might be considered. In that district, normal density is 100,000 square feet but a PUD provision allows lots as small as 50,000 or sometimes 30,000 square feet as long as overall density is maintained. Each lot must still meet setback and total lot coverage requirements. The result in Morse Park has been an attractively laid out mixture of small and medium size lots depending on the type and space requirements of individual uses. If the idea of such an industrial PUD -eems reasonable at this site, a zoning amend - ment would be required. NOTE ON ALL APPLICATIONS = Fire Chief Jim Godette has been in the hospital all week and none of the plans have been reviewed in regard to fire protection. it M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next Week's Agenda Items Date: 11/21/79 #2 Windridge 1. Plan layout is acceptable. #3 Stonehedge • 1. Road curve radii shall be a minimum of 200 feet and superelevated. 2. Curbs should be constructed in the inside of curves at 15' from center line to protect road edge. 3. Opening at cul-du-sac should be 30' in width with radii curbed. #5 South Burlington Realty, San Remo Drive 1. Surface drainage should be intercepted and discharged to the street storm drainage system. No surface or roof drainage should be allowed to dis- charge onto adjacant properties. 2. Curb opening shall be constructed with concrete depressed curbing. #6 Homer Dubois Subdivision, Hinesburg Road 1. This is a subdivision of a large parcel of land on a road that carries heavy truck traffic. Road opening should be carefully planned. It would be . my preference to see a plan developed for Mr. Dubois's entire parcel with con- sideration given for future streets and a single road access to Hinesburg Road possiblv opposite to the R.O.W. that is reserved for a future street when the east side was sub -divided several years ago. #7 Gregory& Daughters, Industral Park, Williston Road 1. A turnaround should be provided. 2. A street R.O.W. should be reserved for future continuation of the street to the R.D.R. property. 3. State Highway permit will be required for access to Williston Road. 4. Sewage disposal will have to be on site unless a pumping station is installed with a force main to the existing gravity system. PUCHARD A. SPOKES JOSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI WILLIAM G. LIVINGSTON SPOKES 8 OBUCHOWSKI ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. BOX 2325 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 November 9, 1979 Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator City Offices 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Application of Gregory and Daughters Dear Dick: a 1775 WILLISTON ROAD TELEPHONE (802) 863-2857 You asked that we review the Gregory and daughters application for compliance with the zoning ordinance's minimum lot area requirements. You indicated to me that the parcel in question lies within the industrial district which has a minimum 80,000 square feet area requirement. The crux of the problem as you presented it is that the applicant has used "rat tails" to join noncontiguous pieces of land in order to meet the 80,000 square foot minimum. The basic issue here is how to construe the definition of "lot" and how to apply the minimum area requirements of the zoning ordinance. Generally, if the language of a zoning ordinance is clear as to a given issue, the express language of the ordinance should be applied. If, on the other hand, the ordinance fails to address an issue, or is not clear in a given factual situation, then general rules of construction must be applied. The focus of ordinance construction is to determine legislative intent. (See McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, Section 20.42 and Burlington Light & Power Co. vs. City of Burlington, 93 Vt. 27 (1918).) Furthermore, the ordinance should be construed in a practical, reasonable, and liberal manner with a view toward the purposes of the minimum lot area requirement. (See McQuillin, Section 20.46, 20.48 and 20.49; State vs. Gamelin, 111 Vt. 245 (_1940) . ) It appears in the situation of the Gregory and daughters application that there may be strict compliance with the area provisions of the ordinance. However, it is clear that the applicant seeks to Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator Page 2 November 9, 1979 circumvent the intent of the ordinance by creating noncontiguous portions of single lots. The purpose of minimum lot area require- ments is to comply with density limitations outlined in the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan for aesthetic and public safety purposes. (See Anderson, American Law of Zoning, Section 7.20.) The applicants' proposal, while artfully conceived, contravenes those purposes. Therefore, it would be within your discretion to deny the application on the basis of practical and liberal con- struction of the ordinance in light of legislative intent and the purposes for lot area restrictions. If you have any further questions regarding this application, please feel free to call. Very truly yours, William G. Livingston WGL/rcw LAW OFFICES OF KOLVOORO, OVERTON & WILSON THREE MAIN STREET ESSEX JUNCTION. VERMONT 05452 - 3199 TELEPHONE: 502-676-3346 PHILIP A. KOLVOORO ALAN O. OVERTON GREGG H. WILSON MICHAEL O. OANLEY Mr. Kyle Wheel Planning Assistant City of South Burlington. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Mr, Wheel: December 13, 1984 Enclosed herewith is property transfer return regarding Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park as requested. Sincerely-� Michael D. Danley', MDD/gl Enclosure LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT Gregory Construction THIS AGREEMENT, in triplicate, by and between: _ Company hereinafter referred to as "Developer", the CI':`Y OF SOUTH BUPT-T( '''1, `cereinafter referred to as "Municipality", and Vermont_ National Bank , hereinafter referred to as "Bank". W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, Developer has received final subdidsion approval from the Municipality's Planning Commission for the construction and Industrial development of Six,.___-.-__ qt XXXXUX $= units in a development to be known as Gregory Industrial Park --- as depicted on a final plat plan entitled Gregory Industrial Park da tcd March 26, 1980 , prepared by Krebs and Lansing Corm lting En 1keers, Inc. ; and WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approval, at its own to complete certain public improvements; and WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement wish to establish a mechanism to secure the obligations of the Developer as set forth above; and WHEREAS, the Bank executes this agreement solely in the capacity of issuer of the Letter of Credit hereinafter specified. NOW, `IHEREF'ORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Developer will at its own expense complete the following improvements in connection with its development: WC 7,. , improvements required by subdivision approval) Complete the follows : Blactbp Road, Power poles & underground cable. 2. Developer will convey to the Municipality by properly executed Warranty Deed, free and clear of all encumbrances,the roadways, easements and other public improvements prior to the unicipality granting any zoning permits to the developer. s. The Developer stall compl:�te the improvements set forth in paragraph one no later than _ August_ 5. 1985 4. The Developer shall repair or replace any faulty or def(�ct.ive work or improper material which may appear within -one years of completion. 5. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all requirements hereinabove set forth, Developer has caused Bank to issue its irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the Municipality, the original of which is attached to the Municipality's copy of this agreement, and copies of which are attached to the Developer's and Bank's copy. 6. Said Letter of Credit provides that if the City shall file with the Bank a statement that Developer in the judgment of the City is in sixty (60) day default under the terms of this agreement, the Bank shall from time to time make payments to the Municipality under said Letter 3f Credit in amounts not to exceed the total certified by the Municipality to be reasonably required to perform the obligations.imposed upon the Developer by this agreement. 7. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of such statement as it files with the Bank. The consent -2- of.- th(2 Developer to such payment by the Bank to the Municipality shall not be required. The Bank shall incur no liability to the D(_�veloper on account of making such payment to the Municipality, nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety of any claim by the Municipality of default on the part of the Developer or into the use of such funds by the Municipality in completing such improvements. 8. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a statement of default until sixty (60) days after notice has been sent by it to the Developer by certi£icA mail, return receipt requested, setting forth its intention to do so. 9. All funds paid to the Municipality pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used by the Municipality solely for the purpose of performing obligations imposed upon the Developer by that por- tion of this agreement upon which the Developer is then in default. Aiv work to Le performed by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall b(-. let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the Municipality with its own work force and equipment or shall be accomplished in such manner as in the judgment of the Municipality shall accomplish the work most expeditiously and economically. 10. If payments are made by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to the Letter of Credit and it shall later develop that a portion of the released monies are surplus to the Municipality's needs, any such surplus shall be :refunded by the Municipality to the - 3- u Bank to be held and distributed by the Bank pursuant to the terms of this agreement. 11. The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such payments to the Municipality in accordance with the Letter of Credit when application is properly made by the Municipality in accordance therewith, and Developer will not interfere with or hinder such, payments by the Bank to the Municipality. Said statement shall contain a certificate of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph 8 of this agreement. 12. i'his agreement shall terminate and shall be of no force or e ff c-ct upon perf:ormsnce of al.l. requirements contemplated hereby and the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph 4. 13. Upon request of Developer, but only at the sole discre- tion of the Municipality, the Municipality may agree to reduce the amount of the Letter of Credit required hereunder if the Ptuni.cipal_ity believes that the full amount of the Letter of Credit required hereby is no longer necessary to protect its interests after a portion of said work has been completed. Bank may release such funds only upon written consent of the Municipality. 1.4. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 13 the amount of the Letter.'of Credit shall not be reduced to less than $30,000.00 (Thirty Thousand) until certification to the Bank by the Municipality of the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph 4. 15. This agreement shall not only be binding upon the parties -4- hereto, but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. �l Dated this / day of ;� ��� 198Y IN THE PRE$ENCE OF: By: By. M -5- (DEVELOPER) Gr oCo ru do I-s Duly Aut��rize('Agent CITY OF SOUTH BURLIINGTON Its Duly A th zed Agent i K) Vet�ont Na o ank :� Its Duly Authorized Aglent HIED HED SUPPLY INC. ' 30 TROY AVENUE INTERCHANGE DRIVE � RCHANG H 9 iG WINOOSKI, VT. 05404 WEST LEBANON, NH. 03764 1 602-655-3505 603-295-5275 _ A IM D r D SOLD 3 TO 1� SHIP TO 1 TAXABLE CASH ct� Rer RATE NONTAXABLEEl I/ - DESCPIPTfO.N PRIG 4M �iti7 f� DATE Person Testing ' Static Pres§M Test Started #; Completed Pressure Raised To time eallons Lost Footage Te_te� r FOR OFFICE USE ONLY A service charge of 11/2% (18% per annum) monthly will be charged on p4erdue accounts. SUBTOTAL N D FREIGHT Q ❑ TAX r RECEIVED BY Htz-U HhU SUPPLY INC. 30 TROY AVENUE F] 0 INTERCHANGE DRIVE WINOOSKI, VT. 05404 WEST LEBANON, NH. 03784 802-655-3505 603-298-5275 SOLD TO SHIP TO j A_ -1 M I I-] ­,jL T AXABLE ';­ � - " - NON TAXABLE A1'0G NUMBER QUANTITY 0 E S GP I - - - #- - - - - L DATE ARRIVAL nME Person Testing Static Rv"" Test Started ­4pleted 7 Pressure Raised To jime rp-mire Drnp Time 4­ 83110m; Lost e Tested x - A service charge of 1 1/1% (18% per annum) monthly willbe charted on overdue accounts. FOR O I r FFCE USE ONLY ----I r ----1 1SUB-TOTAL , N Li LJ FREIGHT T AXtl L 0 =7 RECEIVED BY City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 December 10, 1984 Mr. Michael Danley Kolvoord, Overton, and Wilson 3 Main Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Dear Mr. Danley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 In requesting a property tax transfer return regarding Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park, I inadvertently excluded a road deed, for which I have enclosed a copy. Could you please send me the above mentioned return. My number is 658-7958 if you have any questions. Sii nncerel , fI eel ning Assistant I LAW OFFICES OF KOLVOORD, OVERTON & WILSON THREE MAIN STREET ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452-3199 TELEPHONE: 802- 878-3346 PHILIP A. KOLVOORD ALAN D. OVERTON November 28, 1984 GREGG H. WILSON MICHAEL D. DANLEY RICHARD C. WHITTLESEY Mr. Kyle Wheel, Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 WE ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: Property Transfer Tax Return of Crawford W. Gregory and Judith T. Gregory Property Transfer Tax Return of William R. Lang and Gail S. Lang KOLVO�RD, VERT N & WILSON BY: �j ��' PLANNER 658-7955 Mr. Michael Danley Kolvoord, Overton, 3 Main Street Essex Junction, VT. Dear Mr. Danley: City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 and Wilson 05452 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 November 26, 1984 Per our conversation on November 19, 1984 please find enclosed a copy of the deed for a pedestian easement on the property of William and Gail Lang. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of�znother dee-d—,not,,accompanied by a property transfer return. Apparently it was drawn upL your firm, but I have been unable to determine who prepared it. If this second deed'is not the responsibility of your firm, please inform me so I may further research the matter. My number is 658-7953 if you have any questions. Sincer ly, Wheel nfing AsFl-arsistant ._T _.1;• -f .., J STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452, Telephone: 879-6563 MEMORANDUM TO: Statutory Parties FROM: Katherine M. Vose, Environmental Board District Coordinator DATE: October 18, 1984 RE: Land Use Permit Application #4CO437-2 C. W. Gregory and Judith Gregory South Burlington Mn, GAT ON Enclosed for your review is a copy of the proposed land use permit for the above -referenced project. As indicated in the Notice of Application and Hearing, this application is being processed as a "Minor" pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 51 (as amended on September 1, 1984), and no hearing will be held unless specifically requested. Any hearing held at the request of a party would only be for the purpose of considering issues raised by the requesting party under the appropriate criteria of Act 250. Because this "proposed" permit has been prepared based upon consultations with only the Chairman of the District Commission, it is subject to further revision or amendment after review by the full District Commission. If you have any questions regarding this proposed permit or the "Minor" application procedure being used to process this application, do not hesitate to contact me at 879-6563. ee NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND HEARING ACT 250 MINOR AMENDMENT APPLICATION #4CO437-2 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 Notice is hereby given that on October 18, 1984 an application was filed by C. W. Gregory and Judith Gregory of Nob Hill Road, Williston, Vermont 05495 for an extension to their construction completion date to August 30, 1985 for finish coat of paving and curbing of 850 feet of roads and associated water, sewer and storm sewer lines for the previously approved 6 lot industrial subdivision off of Route 2 in South Burlington, Vermont. The District Environmental Commission will treat this application under Environmental Board Rule 51 -- Minor Applications (as amended effective 9/l/84). A proposed permit has been prepared by the Commission and is available at the Commission's office. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless a public hearing is requested. No hearing will be convened unless, on or before MONDAY, NOV EMBER 5, 1984 a party notifies the Commission of an issue or issues requiring the presentation of evidence at a hearing, or the Commission sets the matter for hearing on its own motion. If a timely hearing request is received, the hearing will be convened on NOVEMBER 7, 1984. Parties entitled to participate are the municipality, the municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission, state agencies, adjoining property owners, and persons granted party status pursuant to Board Rule 14(b). By0 Katherine M. Vose District Coordinator for the District #4 Commission 111 West Street, Essex Junction, Vermont 879-6563 05452 1 LDState of Vermont ary' LAND USE PERMIT CASE No. #4CO437-2 APPLICANT C. W. Gregory and ADDRESS Judith Gregory Nob Hill Williston, Vermont 05495 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250) District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit Amendment #4CO437-2 pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 158, Page 234, of the Land Records of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Crawford W. & Judith T. Gregory, the "permittees" as grantees". This permit specifically authorizes the permittees to extend their construction completion date to August 30, 1985 for finish coat of paving and curbing of 850 feet of roads and associated water, sewer and storm sewer lines for the previously approved 6 lot industrial subdivision off of Route 2 in South Burlington, Vermont. The permittees, their assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4CO437 and #4CO437-1 remain in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. All construction on the roadway and utilities must be completed by August 30, 1985. 3. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Sec. 6090(b). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of October, 1984. Katherine M. Vose, District Coordinator for the District #4 Commission ee No Text I JOIK Aorl A p 5 Wos 1Z '(FZOtVfk-j1\k-) e-e,46AAM-) / Z- evoslee-16 13�W4��Z-15 ( 1e& JNI-) ,Ouo bLXLIIderjw Yr Afk-VL, 1160 t4alma 64- A"L, gt- y La vl,,J4�edAa J A Te, 1)'Y-A KREBS & LANSING( CONSULTING ENGINEERS nqC. Shelburne Road SHELBURNE, VT 05482 (802) 985-2827 TO ,aA-S/I LIETTO OF "TRUSIODU TM DATE JOB NO. ATTENTI RE: GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU fnYA}tached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted for your use ElApproved as noted FcY- s requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY SIGNED: \L-U FORM 2ao-2 Available from Jn e Inc., Groton, Mass. 01450 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. KREBS & LANSINd CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. Shelburne Road SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 (802) 985-2827 TO GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings El Copy of letter [LEEM0 OF "MQOMO UML DATE ;o ATTENTION RE: Q Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Change order ❑ ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION J� THESE THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: I ('K\! FORM 240-2 - Available from � Townsend, Mass. 01469 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify —us--aft once. KREBS & LANSING' CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. Shelburne Road SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 (802) 985-2827 TO -DWI Gp �l� C A & vY��l (J)6q- L[EUTEf OIF MQ M1010V L DATE ATTENTION RE: GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment 11 _ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ___the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints Ll PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY SIGNED: FORM 240-2 - Available from (Y D Townsend, Mass. 01469 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at KREBS & LANSINd CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. Shelburne Road SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 (8,02,)I985-2827 TO �64_a TJVIl�V�1� ;1 UN TVI WN��tJ-�J►�+fI�II G GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings Copy of letter LEUM @[F ffQQAMMOUTUL DATE 6 JOB NQ . ^ Z C ATTENTION RE: I Wn Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order ❑ F= DESCRIPTION GIVE FINE IDIOM`®i m 1111, 0 ME I THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For a proval ❑ Approved as submitted For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY SIGNED: /�� FORM 240-2 - Available from ees Townsend, Mass. 01469 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify usus at once. KREBS & LANSIN( CONSULTING ENGINEEK_ INC. Shelburne Road SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 (802) 985.2827 TO JAIP R,FF1r1r[( -, OF UQQASE01rUzU. DATE ATTENTION RE: GEN I LEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU �tached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings rints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ 5:OPAES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 7 t .O!?� THESE ARE, TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ Fo proval ❑ Approved as submitted For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY SIGNED: ` !� FORM 200-2-Avsllable from A s Townsend, Mass. 01469 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify usNonce. �n KREBS & LANSINd y CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. Shelburne Road U SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 TO li L. it lEi �) 1/_ ram/ • L� Lr GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter JOB N ATTENTI RE: attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. { DESCRIPTION t THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: REMARKS ❑ For approval ,Z1 -Tor your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections El ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US r.O PY SIGNED: Available from Ees Townsend, Mass. 01469 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at KREBS & LANSING( CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. Shelburne Road SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 (802) 985-2827 its] GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter [L[Elrlr[Er 3IFIrMRSO UTIQL DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION RE: Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans— ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order COPIES DATE DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO I - Available from � Townsend, Mass. 01469 SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at C State F of AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Natural Resources Conservation Council May 22, 1987 Mr. Paul Marquis R.P.M. Development Inc. 4050 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Mr. Marquis: Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 RE: Case Number PB-4-1270 (Act 250 No. 4C0437-6) Industrial Building on Lot 2, Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park, off Route 2, South Burlington, Vermont. We have received revisions to your proposed building construction and subdivision on the above referenced project. We are prepared to issue a permit once the final construction approval for the water and sewer main extensions for the Industrial Park are completed as required by Certification of Compliance No. 4CO437 and amendments. I spoke with your attorney, Harley Brown and told him I would again outline the information needed to finalize acceptance of use of these extensions. Upon reviewing our files, I find that my letter dated April 1, 1986 details the still needed information. A copy of that letter is attached. Since that letter, we received one copy of a "Record Drawing" from Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers and a letter from City Manager William Szymanski dated April 30, 1987 indicating the City's acdeptance of the water and sewer leakage testing. The record drawing did not locate all manholes (with rim and invert elevations) and pump station evaluation. Also, leakage testing of the manholes, pump station and force main were to be conducted in the presence of the engineer. Since the water main extension is also under the jurisdiction of the Department of Health, we shall accept their written acceptance of the water main. We have received a copy of a letter from Hilary Jean of the Department of Health to Robert Krebs dated October 2, 1986 requesting further information. It does not appear that this information was submitted. At this time, the park is being occupied and is in violation of the conditions of the Certification of Compliance No. 4C0437. This violation may be pursued by the Attorney General's office for enforcement. Mr. Paul Marquis May 22, 1987 Page 2 We shall be happy to meet to discuss this matter further. At this time we will not approve any new connections to these sewer and water main extensions. There is also the option of connecting directly to municipal services for this project. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Mary K. Clark Assistant Regional Engineer MKC/kaa cc: James Dodge Hilary Jean Harley Brown III, Esq. C.W. Gregory Katherine Vose City of South Burlington. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Division of Traffcon Systems, Inc. 152 BANK STREET BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 TELEPHONE 802 864-7463 REVIEW OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AT THE PROPOSED GREGORY & DAUGHTERS INDUSTRIAL PARK PREPARED FOR: KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3010 SHELBURNE ROAD SHELBURNE, VERMONT BY: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES 152 BANK STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT l TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Division of Traffcon Systems, Inc. 152 BANK STREET BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 TELEPHONE 802 864 7463 March 21, 1980 Robert Krebs Krebs & Lansing 3010 Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Bob: I am submitting herein, five (5) copies of our "Review of Traffic Operations at the Proposed Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park". The analysis are based upon: 1. A comprehensive field inspection 2. Traffic monitoring conducted on March 4-7, 1980 3. Accident records obtained from the So.Burlington Police Department The conclusion reached in the review is that the proposed development is not likely to have any adverse impact on either the quality of traffic service or upon traffic safety on adjacent highway facilities. We are pleased to be able to make this report to you. If we can be of further assistance, please call upon us. Respectively submitted, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES David M. Bogue Project Engineer DMB/sm CONTENT OF REPORT LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 TABLE 1 EXISTING PHYSICAL FEATURES AT THE INTERSECTION OF PALMER CIRCLE AND WILLISTON ROAD (RT 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . ..3 P r nT TDT I EXISTING WILLISTON ROAD-PALMER CIRCLE INTERSECTION LAYOUT AND PROPOSED CHANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 TABLE 2 OBSERVED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON WILLISTON ROAD EAST OF PALMER CIRCLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 T'T /IT Tn T' ry OBSERVED HOURLY TRAFFIC VARIATIONS ON PALMER CIRCLE . . . .6 TABLE 3 COMPARISON OF A.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON PROPOSED TURNING LANES WITH LIMITING SERVICE VOLUMES FOR LEVEL OF SERVICE "E" AT THE INTERSECTION OF PALMER CIRCLE, WILLISTON ROAD, AND THE PROPOSED GREGORY DRIVE . . . . . . . . . . . .7 FIGURE 3 P.M. PEAK HOUR (4:00 5:00 P.M.) TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES..8 TT/1i TTlT li A.M. PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (7-8 AM) . . . . . 9 APPENDIX A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORT SUMMARY 8 CONCLUSION Based on a comprehensive review of traffic operations at the intersection of Palmer Circle and Williston Road (The site proposed for the Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park) it is not likely that the small amount of additional traffic will have an adverse impact on traffic flow or safety. A field evaluation of the existing intersection revealed a pavement width of 45 feet on the West Approach, 30 feet on the East Approach and 29 feet on the North Approach, (Palmer Circle), and average grade of 8% on Williston Road and stopping distance of approximately 430' on the West Approach, adequate for the 40 MPH posted speed limit.' The pavement width on the East Approach is sufficient for the addition of a 10 foot Left Turn Lane and the developer proposes to widen the West Approach to include a 12' Right Turn Lane. Peak hour traffic volumes were obtained from an automatic traffic recorded place on Williston Road near the proposed site. The peak hour measured during the four day observation occurred on Friday from 4-5 P.M. It was 1490 vehicles. The volume of traffic anticipated to enter and exit the proposed Industrial Park was computed using trip generation rates established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. This volume was computed to be 125 vehicles during the adjacent roadway peak hour. The capacity of the proposed Left Turn Lane and Right Turn Lane were computed and compared to the project volumes to use these lanes. Based on these comparisons there is adequate capacity available to accommodate the small volume of traffic expected to use these lanes without causing any significant Page 1 impact on existing traffic. It should be noted here that the existing intersection is currently stripped for the proposed Left Turn Lane. Therefore, the use of this lane should not affect the existing traffic flow, as it will not change the flow pattern or add traffic to the Thru Lane. With appropriate lane markings, warning and regulatory signs it is unlikely the proposed access will create a safety problem. A review of traffic accidents reported at or near the proposed access road during the past two years revealed only one accident. This was a single car accident involving a small male deer. Page 2 TABLE 1 EXISTING PHYSICAL FEATURES AT THE INTERSECTION OF PALMER CIRCLE AND WILLISTON ROAD (RT 2) WEST EAST NORTH PAVEMENT WIDTH 45' 30' 29' LATERAL CLEARANCE 3' 1'-4' 24' AVERAGE GRADE 8% 8% to STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE 430' 500' - POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH 40MPH - Page 3 FIGURE 1. EXISTING WILLISTON ROAD-PALMER CIRCLE INTERSECTION LAYOUT AND PROPOSED CHANGES z9� /0' 1 /011 100 I Page ':4 6aebomv DQov G TABLE 2 OBSERVED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON WILLISTON ROAD EAST OF PALMER CIRCLE 2 DIRECTIONAL DATE TIME VOLUME %EASTBOUND %WESTBOUND 3/4/80 TUESDAY 4-5 PM 1359 46/54 3/5/80 WEDNESDAY 7-8 AM 1182 43/57 4-5 PM 1319 45/55 3/6/80 THURSDAY 7-8 AM 1173 42/58 4-5 PM 1346 47/53 3/7/80 FRIDAY 7-8 AM 1139 42/58 4-5 PM 1490 44/56 Page 5 FIGURE 2 OBSERVED HOURLY TRAFFIC VARIATIONS ON PALMER CIRCLE 40 30 20 J O 1 E C L o c c Z POV2 of CAY Page 6 TABLE 3 COMPARISON OF A.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON PROPOSED TURNING LANES WITH LIMITING SERVICE VOLUMES FOR LEVEL OF SERVICE "E" AT THE INTERSECTION OF PALMER CIRCLE, WILLISTON ROAD, AND THE PROPOSED GREGORY DRIVE TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTIC WEST APPROACH EAST APPROACH RIGHT TURN LANE LEFT TURN LANE PEAK HOUR VOLUME 70 55 COMPUTED CAPACITY 800 620 VOLUME/CAPACITY .09 .09 LEVEL OF SERVICE A A Page 7 FIGURE 3. P.M. PEAK HOUR (4:00-5:00 P.M) TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TURN MR: TOWN - LOCATION: NOTi: LABEL APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS ON ARROW ABOVE. REYARILs: ESTIMATED TURNING MOVING VOLUMES (Q -FIELD DATA O____AiDT REV. It / 74 Lr FIGURE 4. A.M. PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (7-8AM) 15 4n or ;J rum NR: TOWN: 1,u2L IN G1?JN LOCATION: NOTE: LABEL APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS ON ARROW A60VE. LI ESTIMATED TURNING MOVING VOLUMES O PrIELD DATA O ADT Page 9 REv.12 /70 '• APPENDIX A State of Vermont POLICE REPORT OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT TIME OF ACC. DAY OF WEEK MONTH DAY YEAR CITY —TOWN Tuesday 1'� 24 �� 8 So. 3urliri NO. OF HIGHWAY OR NAME OF STREET INTERSECTING STREET OR ROAD ON Rt.T>2 Williston ttd. kiuddy i rook :fill IF NOT AT INTERSECTION 14 E NEAREST STREET, HI AT FEET *3MILES SW Of Industrial Ave. Police No. 9545 M.V.D. No. COUNTMILE MARKER Chitt. I I I RURAL X URBAN BRIDGE, LANDMARK DIRECTION F TRAVEL �N east VEH_ NO. 2 OPERATOR'S EAST FIRST MIDDLE ADDRESS CITY AND STATE SEX AGE ELT INJ. NAME Reed Patricia Jo S auldin 's Ftast `shore Col hester,'� � F ' r1 LICENSE NO. STATE DATE OF BI TH FRONT CENTER —NAME CITY STATE R '�()6 6420 41 ilich55 SOCIAL,SECURITY N 1810 RESTRICTION ON LICENSE FRONT RIGHT REAR LEFT _�t,2—;- PLA(t OF BIRTH DRIVIR tXP rlyandottP Mich V yrs. _ VEH YEAR MAKE - MODEL - TYPE REAR CENTER 75 1 Chevy Camaro REWSTRATION NO. STATE REAR RIGHT SK ? l 'rli art _ VEHICLE IDENT. NO. SPEEDOMETER READING APP COST REPAIR APPARENT PARTS VEHICLE DAMAGED 5�1 5 59CIRCLE l 87H.l 1 16 22,250 minor NO IN BOX FOR EACH AREA DAMAGED OWNER: LAST FIRST MIDDLE CITY AND STATE ; ; j 1 s 13 Hood la R�„{ NAME: Same, & Reed Alan Colchester VT 12 tZ 14 I , - Veh. 1 OPERATOR DRIVER TRAININ VEHICLE REMOVED BY: TOt LOCATION 16 U,,de,c.—a e COMPLETED HIGH X YfS Y Ai 12 11 : to : B ! • 7 , 17 Total CM lhoi L pnerator C n w� OPERATOR'S LAST FIRST MIDDLE ADDRESS CITY AND STATE SEX AGE ELT INy. LIB c.NSE NO. SOCIAL SECURITY too STATE I DATE OF BI TH RE TRI iION ON LICENSE FRONT CENTER — NAME CITY — STATE FRONT RIGHT PLAN OF BIRTH DRIVER EXP. REAR LEFT VEH YEAR MAKE - MODEL - TYPE REAR CENTER REGISTRATION NO, VEHICLE IDENT. NO. STATE METER READING REAR RIGHT APP COST REPAIR APPARENT PARTS VEHICLE DAMAGED CIRCLE NO IN BOX FOR EACH AREA DAMAGED OWNER: LAST NAME: FIRST MIDDLE CITY AND STATE 1 I I I I I B . 2 0 -- cr IJ Hood la Roof OPERATOR DRIVER TRAINING VEHICLE REMOVED By- TO: LOCATION COMPLETED HIGH SCHOOL COURSE YES NO YEAR /2 f TT ITC • 1 • I 1I I I I I le Undeaarna e 17 Total NAME. LAST KIRST MIDDLE ADDRESS CITYSTATESEX PIED INJ. i DATE OF BI R T /-I OF PED. AGE Condition of Pedearian 1 AppBeen Normal 2 Been Drinking 3 Under Intl [] Liquor . ❑ Drugs 4 Unknown. What Was Pedestrian Doing -- — ---- I Walk with Traffic 2 Walk Agst. Traffic 3 Not in Roadway 4 Cross or Ent. Int. 5 Same Not at Int. 9 OtherPIED.❑ 6 Playing In Road 7 Get On/Off Veh. 8 Push/Wk. on Veh. LIST APPARENT PHV. DEFECT OF P CLOTHING OF FED I— I J DARK LIGHT J MODERATE UNKNOWN _NO T if IED OF ACCIDENT I ARRIVED AT SCENE CODE OF INJURY IME MONTH L l4 DATE 24 YEAR 8 TIME .� MONTH p DATE 24 YEAR Use ► Only ese :.r;.V ---L9- _ SI 1 URE I ESTIGATIN OFFICER 10 RANK TE REP RT M 9 DE K — Fatal Injury l l OO A — Incapacitating Injury N A I UH PP n I DATE APPROV D DEPARTMENT OR TROOP B—Nonincapacitating Injury tit— �' 5d13D C —Possible Injury Imc Tf ntitiititin Officer:O — No Injury D. M. V .—A-8--2-76 D #defer Velakb Von Veh Condition Traffic Control S c.tlW.r w;tta: I 2 operator I Stop•Go Sig. e I Pedestrian I Drinking 2 Flash. Traf. S' q lot2 t MV in traffic ffi 2 Asleep 3 Under Infl. 3 Railroad Sign � y 3 Parke) MV 4 Railroad Train liquor H 4 Stop Sign i 5 Pedalcycle Drugs 5 Yield Sign e 6 Animal 4 App Phy Def e 7 Fixed Object X 5 App Normal 6 Curve -Warning 1 O Tree 6 Unknown 7 No Traf. Cont. E Tel. Pole N Guardrail Posted Speed Limit OPERATORS T 8 Other Object S 9 Overturned IFXI I Not Posted Estimated Speed C 100ther Non Coll. 2 Limit Posted MP.H. of 1 n— M.P.H. N [ 1 1 Snowmobile 50 Max. Limit 2 M.P.H. WITAICCCVC 111rUCD TL1AN1 n!`!'1IDAIUTC W 1 T N E S S E S D t S P N J U D P E R S O N S Road Character Weather I Level I Cleat 2 On Grade 2 Rain 3 On Hillcrem ; Snow 4 Straight 4 Fog 5 Curve 5 Other 6 Sharp Curve 7 Merging U- ne 8 Tunnel -Bridge ught 9 Intersection X I Dawn 10 Alley -Driveway 2 Daytil I I R.R. Crossing 1 Dark 12 Other 1 4 Dusk NAME LAST FIRST MIDDLE CITV SIA1[ NAME CITY - NAME CITY - NAME CITY - Road Type I Concrete 2 Black -To i Gravel 4 Dirt S Other Road Cond. X I Dry 2 Wet 3 Snowy 4 Icy 5 Other Property Dam U. , h, 11 -aar 'eh Von Condition 1 2 Of Vehicle I Def. Brakes 2 Imp. Lights 3 Def. Steenn 4 Def. Tire C 5 No [)elect 6 Un. Insp. were photos T,ken Yes �r No TAKEN SY Other Than Vehicle APP. COST REPAIRS • OWNER'S NAME: ADDRESS: Location VEH APPARENT NATURE AND EXTENT OF INJURIES INJURED TAKEN TO BY WHOM: OPERATOR FRONT CENTER FRONT RIGHT REAR LEFT REAR CENTER EAR RIGHT -- -, - ---.--- PE D Location VEH 2 APPARENT NATURE AND EXTENT OF INJURIES INJURED TAKEN TO By WHOM. OPERATOR FRONT CENTER FRONT RIGHT REAR LEFT REAR CENTER REAR RIGHT PE D : D Refer Vehicles by Number: E S C R E A C C 1 D E N T C DESCRIBE FACTORS YOU FEEL ACTION H CLE N I CONTRIBUTED TO CAUSING ACCIDENTS TAKEN ONE 1. 2. 3. E A animal entering road- CUUR1 YES N B Way C1ION NO X T C UTT M LAW VIOLATIONS ` D E S C R I s E T H E C C I D E N T I D E T A l --3- State of Vermont Police No. 954 r, POLICE REPORT OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT M.V.D. No. Operator No. I Re r'd Operator No. 2 Pedestrian: Refer to Vehicle By Number: ADDITIONAL PAGE FOR POLICE REPORT OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FOR SKETCH, DATA, OR ANY NECESSARY STATEMENT. IF CONFIDENTIAL SO MARK At 0755 hours on "O-L14-78 this officer (Ba].seru^) met with one Chuch Underhill of 2 Heritage Lane, Colchester, Vt., Tel: 878-8961 in the eastbound lane of Williston Rd. on f:uddy Brook tTi] 1 in reference to a motor vehicle and deer accident. Mr. Underhill was not a witriess to the neci.dent, however was there to advise of the present location of the operntor of veh. Operator #1 (Reed) advised that at approximately 0705 hours, date, she ...as travelling east on Williston Rd. at T.uddy Brook ?sill. At this time a `,-hump eras heard to the right side of veh.''! . Operator'"' traveled several. yards east on �!illiston Rd. to her rInce of employment to find slight damage to the right door of her vehicle. At work she advised A"X. Underhill. of the possibli.lty of hittirg a deer. Both t perator //' and Mr. Underhill then returned to the scene to find a small male deer lyinf beside the south side of the road. The animal stayed there for approx- i.mntely ,; minute^, as it seemed stunned, then ran off south of the ncpne. The Vt. Fi h and Game Dept. i•!ere also notified. Ol erator #1 (RQbd) advised that she did not see the animal to the side of the road dire to the darkness of this time of day. Damage to veh. //1 ,,,as minor, a dent to the right door. nur -4- N N Zrl o l/ C 2„ w L.,.L /a 1 Z) N INDICATE NORTH BY ARROW (D ONE WAY ()IVE WAY TRAFFIC LEFT Tvl2 /\l MUDDY L_ AAlE U00 t< kLAD ANIMAL, I vE �- ENr�rz EA ' I I HEkE i vow/ C70DE /�l U �12UU1� t L L TO KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. Shelburne Road SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 (802) 985-2827 fl?A&)d fpqd�5 PIETTIEM OO F MUS u1f�l MR1. DATE JOB N ATTENTION RE: Util I LtIVIUNC WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ C PIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 4;4,Kor your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS COPY FORM 240-2 - Available from � Townsend, Mass. 01469 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US ., e.� ..�. a� .... ... y ,. a.,y a. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH 'BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hear- Ing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, January.22, 1980, of 7:30 p.m., to consider the 10ilowing: 1. Preliminary plat application of O'Brien Bros. Agency, Inc. to con. struct.a 120 unit condominium com- plex, consisting of 2-sto,ry townhouses, on a 17.25 acre parcel located at the end of Timberlane. The proposed subdivision isbounded by Twin Oaks on the west; Forest' Park, Woodlown and Brlarwood on the north; lands of Daniel and Leo O'Brien and O'Brien Bros. Agency, Inc. on the east; and Interstate 89 on the south. 2. Preliminary plat application of Gregory and Daughters for a 6 lot Industrial subdivision off of Williston Road. The proposed subdivision Is bounded by Muddy Brook to the south, RDR Enterprises and W. Szymanski to the .west, Williston Rood to the north, and deLeClerc to the east. Copies of the application are avail- able for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Sidney B. Pager Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission Jonuary 5, 1980 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 September 17, 1987 Philip George P.O. Box 338, Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Lot #3, 9 Gregory Drive Dear Mr. George: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the minutes of the September 8, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encl cc: C.W. Gregory PLANNING COMMISSION 8 SEPTEMBER 1987 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 8 September 1987, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Peter Jacob, Chairman; Catherine Peacock, John Belter, Mary - Barbara Maher, William Burgess, Judith Hurd, Ann Pugh Also Present Jane Lafleur, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Phil George, Peter Sparks, Larry Williams, Kip Matthews, Archie Myers, Lance Llewellyn, Roger Dickinson, Allan Bartlett, Gordon Woods, George Trono, Mr. & Mrs. Chastenay, Andrew Goodrich, Ron Muir, Bob Kelly, Charles Jennings, 1. Review Minutes of 25 August 1987 Ms. Pugh moved the Minutes of 25 August 1987 be approved as written. Mr. Burgess seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Site plan application of Philip George for construction of a 13,600 sq. ft. building for industrial/commercial use on lot #3, 9 Gregory Drive Mr. George explained there will be a series of ramps and loading docks serving the building. The entrance will be 32 ft. wide, and there will be 24 parking spaces. There will be access from 3 sides of the building. TheJ received a multiple use approval from the Zoning Board. Mrs. Maher raised the question of the street issue and asked how that can be settled. Ms. Lafleur said the Commission does not have the power to accept the letter from Gregory's attorney as proof of intent to upgrade the road. Only the City Council can accept a street. Mrs. Maher said she would prefer to deny the application until there is assurance the road is upgraded. She added the City has been ill-treated by Mr. Gregory. Mr. Jacob explained to the developer that he is caught in the middle of a problem with the overall developer who did not live up to what he was supposed to do with the road. Mr. Sparks said they knew about the problem early on and he has tried to act as middle -man between Mr. Gregory and the City Manager. He said the City Manager wants 2" of black -topping instead of 1 and also wants a $15,000 bond for 5 years to isure the road doesn't break down. Mr. Sparks said Gregory has agreed to these stipulations, but there is no contract as yet. He hoped the Commission would grant approval subject to whatever the City Manager wants. Mrs. Hurd said if an agreement is that close, they could postpone h1aring the application until the agreement is reached. Mr. A PLANNING COMMISSION 9 SEPTEMBER 1987 PAGE 2 Burgess said they can't approve the application until Gregory Drive is an accepted street. Mr. George said he has worked in good faith. He believes there is now a reason for Mr. Gregory to perform. He felt Gregory would be motivated to do the road if this project were approved with that stipulation. Members agreed they would not approve the application but would be willing to listen to it. Mrs. Maher asked if there will be a major traffic problem. The original stipulation said that before a 5th and 6th lot could be developed there would have to be a traffic study to see if a light or other improvements are needed. This is the 5th lot. In addition, Act 250 limited the development to a total of 125 trip ends. Though this project doesn't put them over that, there may still be other things needed, such as the connection to Green Tree Park. She raised the question of who will be responsible for that connection. Mr. Sparks said Gregory is building the link between Greentree and the cul de sac. Ms. Lafleur said this development would be held up until that link is built. Mr. Burgess noted that the old approval said a traffic review would be needed, not necessar- ily a traffic study. Members agreed to have the City Planner review the situation and give an opinion as to whether a full traffic study is needed. Members questioned the uses approved by the Zoning Board. Re- ferring to the Zoning minutes of 24 August, Ms. Lafleur said these include storage and distribution, wholesale, repair shops, and industrial/manufacturing. Ms. Peacock said she wanted to know who will build the road from Green Tree Park. She said she has seen nothing that says Green Tree has to do it. Ms. Lafleur will research: who will build the connection; who is under obligation to build it; when it will be built. Landscaping was deficient by $5,000. Ms. Lafleur will meet with the applicant to work this out. Mrs. Maher stressed that she is unhappy with the traffic numbers that are possible with the conditional approval from the Zoning Board, especially for repair shops. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Philip George for construction of a 13,600 sq. ft. building on lot #3, 9 Gregory Drive as de- picted on a plan entitled "Lot #3 - Gregory Drive, South Bur- lington, Vermont = proposed site plan," prepared 12y Koerner Design, Inc, dated 8/31/87 with the following stipulations: PLANNING COMMISSION 9 SEPTEMBER 1987 PAGE 3 1. A 7900 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. The plans shall be revised to reflect this amount and shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to permit 2. A 270 gpd sewer allocation is granted. The applicant shall pater the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. No building permit shall be issued until capacity is available. 3. The curbing at the entrance drive shall be continuous across the drive and depressed for the width of the drive. 4. Utility services to the building shall be underground. 5. A site drainage plan shall be submitted to the City En- gineer for approval prior to permit. 6. A fire hydrant shall be installed on the lot in a loca- tion approved the the South Burlington Fire Chief. 7. If after review by the City Planner and report to the Planning Commission a traffic study is deemed necessary, it shall be completed and reviewed 12y the Commission to determine the effect of additional development in this subdivision. Issues shall include the condition of the road, the quantity of traffic and the effect of a connection through Green Tree Park. The study shall be paid for by the applicant and completed bv an indipendent consultant under the supervision of the City. Necessary improvements must be made and paid for by the developer or bonded prior to permit. 8. The location of a sign shall be deleted from the plan. 9. The building permit must be obtained within 6 months or «-X n UDJ this approval is null and void. � Mr. Burgess seconded. The motion wa 'defeate unanimously. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commissio den the site.�Cl�� plan _application of Philip George for construction of a 13,600 sq. ft. building on lot #_ , 9 Gregory Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Lot #3 - Gregory Drive, South Burlington, Vermont _ proposed site plan," prepared Koerner Design, Inc., dated 8/31 87 for the following reasons 1. The proposed access to the development via Gregory Drive is not adequate because Gregory Drive is not acceptable as a City street and only 3 lots are permitted on private roads under Section 19.20 of the South Burlington Zoning Regula- tions. PLANNING COMMISSION 25 AUGUST 1987 PAGE 4 2. Since the applicant does not intend to build the road, the plan shows no paved access to the lot. Mr. Burgess seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Continue site plan application of the Davis Company for construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. building for office use, 20 Farrell Street Larry Williams explained this will be a 2-story building with each story being 5,000 sq. ft. There will be 41 parking spaces in an asphalt lot. They agree with"the City Engineer that a retaining will is required in the northeast corner of the lot and will reach an agreement with him as to the com- position of the wall. They will provide a drainage easement across the front of the property. The Fire Chief has re- quested a 30 ft. driveway running to the end of the building. The applicant proposes a 24 ft. drive. They met with the Chief and the Chief agreed to have it 30 ft. not quite to the end of the building. The Chief needs this footage to set up equipment. The applicant disputes this and read a letter from their architect to this affect. Members agreed with the Fire Chief and felt the 30 foot arrangement was manageable. It will require the elimination of 1 parking space, but they will still have enough. The applicant requested credit for existing trees. Ms. Lafleur suggested giving credit for $3500 and requiring an additional $6000. Commission members agreed. Ms. Lafleur noted when the Farrell Street sewer line was put in, developers were to reimburse the City. This should be a condition of this approval. Ms. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan applicationof the Davis Company for construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. office building at 20 Farrell Street as de- picted on a plan entitled "Proposed Office Building _ 20 Farrell Street, South Burlington, Vermont" dated 8/4/87 pre- ared �2y Northern Architects, Inc, with the following stipula- tions: 1. A $9500 landscaing bond shall be posted prior to permit. A revised plan shall be submitted for the Planner's approval prior to permit reflecting at least $6000 in landscaping; $3500 in credit is granted for existing trees. 2. A snow fence shall be installed prior along the conservation zone boundary. No to construction trees should be cut within the CO Zone except as allowed j?y the Zoning Board. t CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGT'ON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #)���1/ G 2 ) APPL I CANT (name, address, phone #) P�u_P—Z'—Gr �j�—:_ 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone S `�,- �►z�� --- 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:___ 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USEZN�usrR�,4��Q�IQ- co/-tuAz pttc,L//7�Sr/o't'---�1�l0_.. s,E4.._z��int� RE�r��rJ4N,5_- 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor)___ ia,400 2 0110 'awr uurrs . , r fir_'wT T �1w, I.& -CrbA 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES r-, N cZ3 may 5 -- 3p. 9) LOT COVERAGE: building%; landscaped areas building, parking, outside storag (�q 370,000. 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $„2-Lj-jaC[jn , Landscaping $ Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ COO) C00 111 ES"rI(v1A'I'ED PROJECT COMPLETION UA'1'F::,4muRR� 4t- 12) Fs'rIMATED AVERAGE DAILY 'TRAFFIC:' (in and out. ) Estimated trip ends (in and out.) during the following hours: "tonda}- t.hrough Friday 11-1'L nt�on -�{ l2-lp ' 3-) p.m. --2 l-;5 p.m --!D.._., ;-6 p.m. _....%; 6-7 p.m. Z.- 1 3) PEAK" HOURS OF oPER:\T r0N : - _y-S_..P,M. 1 4) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATi ON : wea—KdAyS yml DA`I'K O� SUBMTSSION ti I (;; :\'1'I 1?1{ '''l.l l' \\'I' DATE; OF HH-AR1NG -Y. Z T,-E . /.AN40 USE C0ae / 0 0 / .3 TR�o ENQS '1)tR2 EH10I.0 y r-a No Text MOTION OF DENIAL 19-140D That the South Burlington Planning Commission deny the site plan application of Philip George for construction of ar1%3;$00 square foot building on lot #3, 9 Gregory Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Lot 3 - Gregory Drive, South Burlington, Vermont - proposed site plan", prepared by Koerner Design, Inc., dated because of the following reasons: t1-41 K` i 1) �he proposed access to the development via Gregory Drive is not adequate because Gregory Drive is not acceptable as a City Street and only 3 lots are permitted on private roads under Section 19.20 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. 2) The appli-cation is incomplete since the original subdivision approval of April 8 80 required a review of traffic conditions before the appr of the fifth lot in this development. This review ;;t include an analysis of the need for a connection through lands south of this development (formerly Willis land). also noted that development could be upheld on the fifth and sixth lots until condidions are brought up to par. Q ,, MOTION OF DENIAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission deny the site plan application of Philip George for construction of a 13,600 square foot building on lot #3, 9 Gregory Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Lot 3 - Gregory Drive, South Burlington, Vermont - proposed site plan", prepared by Koerner Design, Inc., dated 8/14/87 because of the following reasons: 1) The proposed access to the development via Gregory Drive is not adequate because Gregory Drive is not acceptable as a City Street and only 3 lots are permitted on private roads under Section 19.20 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. 2) The application is incomplete since the original subdivision approval of April 8, 1980 required a review of traffic conditions before the approval of the fifth lot in this development. This review is to include an analysis of the need for a connection through to lands south of this development (formerly Willis land). It also noted that development could be upheld on the fifth and sixth lots until condidions are brought up to par. I 8/24/87 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL 1Q Lj0 � That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Philip George for construction of a-,-6'Q'Q""� square foot building on lot #3, 9 Gregory Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Lot 3 - Gregory Drive, South Burlington, Vermont - proposed site plan", prepared by Koerner Design, Inc., dated 6./. with the following stipulations: 1.� A $7900 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. The plans shall be revised to reflect this amount and shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to permit. 2. A 270 gpd sewer allocation is granted. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. No building permit shall be issued until capacity is available. 3. The curbing at the entrance drive shall be continuous across the drive and depressed for the width of the drive. 4. Utility services to the building shall be underground. �`O-c 5. A site drainage shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to permit. 6. A fire hydrant shall be installed on the lot in a location approved by the South Burlington Fire Chief. a�>a, Irz,,r� % \1,�. �(�, u�, x t -P # -l� �.(C , ��� ��_ Its'"�,c<�G��- 7. A traffic study shall be completed and reviewed by the Planning Commission to determine the effect of additional development in this subdivision. Issues shall include the condition of the road, the quantity of traffic and the effect of a connection through Green Tree Park. The study shall be paid for by the applicant and completed by an independent consultant under the supervision of the City. Necessary improvements must be made and paid for ,;� the developer or bonded prior to permit. b� 8. The building permit must be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. J`Dr �Uc PARADIS, COOMBS & FITZPATRICK ATTORNEYS AT LAW 34 PEARL STREET PO. BOX 174 ESSEX JUNcrION, V ERMONT 05452 VINCENT A. PARADIS (802) 879-6304 FREDERICK W. COOMBS EDWARD D. FITZPATRICK (802) 879-6533 August 25, 1987 Mr. Richard Ward City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Crawford Gregory Dear Dick: 152 BANK STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 864-0066 I represent Crawford Gregory who has been in to see me in connection with the proposed relocation of a portion of Gregory Drive to connect with the Greentree Park Development. As you know, there has been an outstanding unresolved dispute as to the construction of the existing portion of Gregory Drive and it is my understanding that this matter can be resolved in conjunction with the approval of the new development. In that connection, we would offer the following resolution: 1. Crawford Gregory would add an additional 2 inches of black top pavement from Williston Road to the presently existing end of the black top of Gregory Drive; 2. The posting of a letter of credit in favor of the City of South Burlington in the amount of $15,000.00 to replace or repair any faulty or defective workmanship within the roadway as it presently exists (not to include the extension thereof) for a period of 5 years; 3. It is further understood that what shall be faulty or defective workmanship shall be documented by a competent engineering practices; 4. That Crawford Gregory's liability in connection with Gregory Drive in the event of break down of the roadway shall be limited to a maximum of $15,000.00 in expenditures; 5. That the City of South Burlington will accept a deed to the roadway once the black topping has been completed, which deed shall include acceptance of all utilities, water lines, sewer lines, etc., as they presently exist. Mr. Richard Ward Page 2 August 25, 1987 The terms of this letter shall be evidenced by a written agreement to follow signed by the parties to be charged. Ve y truly you s, 1 Vincent A. Paradis VAP/caf M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Date: July 10, 1987 Re: Gregory Drive Road Construction In order to resolve the road construction issue with Mr. Gregory, on Gregory Drive, I would accept the following: 1. Place 2 inches of bituminous surface course instead of the one inch. 2. Furnish a $15,000 bond for a 5 year period to cover any failure of road that may occur during,that period. I understand this proposal is acceptable to Mr. Gregory. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: September 8, 1987 Agenda Items Date: September 4, 1987 2) LOT #3, GREGORY DRIVE 1. Same comments as for earlier plan in memo of August 21, 1987. 2. Sign location,as shown on plan dated August 31, (year should be included on all dates) is not in conformance with ordinance. 5) SOUTHSETT AT SWIFT, BRAND FARM 1. Engineers F & L prepared a good set of plans. 2. In review of the street profiles it was noted that if the entrance to proposed Swift Street were shifted to street "B" instead of "A" it would improve safety by moving the intersection further away from the ledge curve and also to a point on new Swift Street where the grade is much flatter. Lots could be shifted accordingly. I would recommend that the change be a field change however, the lot recorded plan should show this change. 3. Street name and traffic signs shall be erected by the developer upon completion of streets. 4. Utility plans, gas, telephone, electric, T.V. and street lighting shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to any construction. The buried electric, telephone and T.V. cable shall be outside of the street right-of-way in a separate easement. 6) BAGEL BAKER, WHITE STREET 1. White Street sidewalk is located adjacent to the property line not curb as plans show. This sidewalk and the Williston Road sidewalk shall not be disturbed. Plans are not clear as to the intent of those locations. 2. Proposed curb around planting areas should be poured concrete, not asphalt, wood, or precast concrete. 1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 September 4, 1987 Philip S. George P.O. Box 338 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Lot #3, 9 Gregory Drive Dear Mr. George: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also enclosed are Bil- Szymanski's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 8, 1987 to represent your request. Sinr_-erely, � 0"t-a. i4u-� Jana. B. Lafleur, Cite Planner JBL/mcp Encls cc: C.W. Gregory MEMORANDUM South Burlington Planning Commission August 21, 1987 wide drive provides adequate circulation for automobiles. A 400 foot wide by 400 foot deep loading bay located -at the north side of the building is provided. Parking: The development requires 100 parking spaces plus 1 space for each company vehicle operating from the premises. The plans show 155 spaces. Landscaping: The plan requires $52,500 worth of landscaping. Staff calculations show $37,000 worth. The applicant shows a figure of $67,620 as the cost of the proposed landscaping. It is a good landscaping plan, but it does not meet the dollar amount required, according. to my calculations. If the tree sizes are increased and perhaps if a few more are added, the applicant could meet the requirement. Traffic: The applicant estimates that 250 trip ends per day will be generated. During the peak hour of 4 - 5 P.M., 120 trip ends will be generated. The site is just out of traffic overlay zone 5, and therefore the overlay does not apply. However, this use will certainly generate significant traffic on to Hinesburg Road. As with Lane Press, the Commission should require the applicant to study the Hinesburg Road intersection to evaluate whether any improvements are necessary. A Hinesburg Road intersection improvement fee shall be paid to the City based on the 120 trip ends generated. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. A sewer allocation of 2250 gpd must be made and the $2.50 per gallon fee must be paid prior to permit. Building permits will not be issued until the capacity is available from the Airport Parkway Sewage Treatment Plant. A contribution to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund shall be made based on the 633 feet of frontage. This number will be available at the meeting. 6) PHIL GEORGE, LOT #3, 9 GREGORY DRIVE Mr. George proposes to construct a 13,600 square foot building on a 50,594 square foot lot for multiple uses (storage, distri- bution, warehouse establishments and repair shops). The appli- cant is seeking a multiple use permit from the Zoning Board on x the 24th. Access: Access to the lot is shown via a 32 foot wide drive from the new section of Gregory Drive which will be realigned and extended to Green Tree Park. This lot is owned by C.W. Gregory. As you know Mr. Gregory did not build Gregory Drive to acceptable City standards. The Planning Commission should consider tabling this application, or approving it with a condition that the road be upgraded. (See Bill Szymanski's memo regarding this.) 4 AEMORANDUM South Burlington Planning Commission August 21, 1987 Circulation: A 24 foot wide circulation drive is shown on three sides of the building. At the south east corner of the building the driveway shrinks to 20 feet wide because one parking space juts out into the drive. This should be corrected. The drive on the west of the building is gravel. In the south west corner circulation may be tight. Parking:' Twenty four Spaces are required to meet the ordinance requirement. (Office = 4 spaces plus 23 non office workers = 15 spaces plus five for company vehicles). The plans show 27. Landscaping: According to my calculations, $2860. worth of landscaping is shown'(excluding cost for lawn) because we do not give credit for that). The plans require $7940 in landscaping. The Commission should require that the applicant plant larger maples and some salt resistant evergreens in the front yard. A landscaping bond of $7940 shall be posted prior to permit. Traffic: This lot is in traffic overlay zone 5 and a maximum of 57 peak hour trip ends are allowed. According to limited ITE data the following peak hour trip ends will be generated by this use: 10 for manufacturing, 14 for industrial, 22 for warehousing. The Act 250 umbrella permit allowed a total of 125 trip ends during the peak hour from this subdivision. To date, 92 projected trip ends have been approved. The Planning Commission approval required a review of traffic before approval of the 5th lot (this application). Th+7also required an analysis of the need for a connection to the Green Tree Park land (formerly Willis land). It was noted that approval of lots #5 and 6 could be withheld until conditions are brought up to par. (Minutes of 4/8/80). Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. A sewer allocation of 270 gpd must be made and a $2.50/gallon fee must be paid prior to permit. 7) THE DAVIS COMPANY, 20 FARRELL STREET The applicant proposes to construct a 10,000 square foot office building on a 10,000 square foot office building on a 1.3 acre lot. The applicant is seeking a variance from the Zoning Board from dimensional requirements, in order to build the building with 54 square feet located to within 95 feet of the centerline of Potash Brook. Access: Access is via a 24 foot wide drive off Farrell Street. Circulation: The 24 foot wide circulation drive is through the 5 Memorandum August 21, 1987 - Szymanski Page 2 6) LOT *3, GREGORY DRIVE 1. The road issue with Mr. Gregory should be resolved. A proposal to resolve this issue was presented by the realtor to Mr. Gregory. An agreement should be drafted. City Attorney was asked to do this but has several other request of higher priority pending and it may be some time before this is done. 2. Curbing at entrance drive shall be continuous across drive and depressed for the width of drive. 3. Utility services to the building shall be underground. 4. A site drainage plan shall be submitted. 7) OFFICE BUILDING, 20 FARRELL STREET 1. There will be a 6 - 8 foot cut at north-east corner for the parking .1ot. A retaining wall should be considered there. 2. There exists a drainage system across the front of this property. This system drains Farrell Street from the north. The City should have a 15 foot easement for this system so that it can be maintained by the City. 2 TO : FROM: RE: DATE: #1. #2. # 3 . #4. �\s r S Vwe _c\ �`'!S:i r 0Ic GQl Dul' +Nnrlingtnn Nirle DepanmEnt 575 Dorset #treet *oath Nurliugtuu, Vermont 05401 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 MEMORANDUM ---------------- SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE TUESDAY AUGUST 2S,1987 AGENDA ITEMS AUGUST 20,1987 ETHAN ALLEN FARM SUB -DIVISION PHASE 3 LOTS 22-42 PLANS REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS PROJECT. ORCHARD LAKE ROAD PROPERTY HINESBURG ROAD PLANS BEEN REVIEWED AND BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING THERE IS NOT GOOD ACCESS TO THE BUILDING FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT. LOT-3 GREGORY DRIVE OVER ALL I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS BUILDING BUT DUE TO THE SIZE ONE HYDRANT SHOULD BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPERTY AND LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT. DESLAURIER/DORSET STREET PROPERTY. PLANS REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE FOLLOWING WAS FOUND WHICH NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE: A. ROADS TO BE NO LESS THEN 30FT. WIDE. B. BUILDINGS TO BE SO LOCATED ON PROPERTY FOR BIE'rTER ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT. C. LOOPED WATER SYSTEM AND PROPER NUMBER OF HYDRANTS INSTALLED FOR SIZE OF BUILDINGS AT LOCATIONS APPROVED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT. City of South Burlinpon 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 0`,403 PLANNER 658-7955 August 21 , 1987 Philip S. George P.O. Box 338 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Lot #3, 9 Gregory Drive Dear Mr. George: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the I'lanning Commission. Also enclosed are Bill Szymanski's and Ch -I' Goddette's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesds'Y, August 25, 1987 to represent your request. Sincerely, ��?� Jane B. Lafleur, City Plann+- 1, JBL/mcp Encls cc: C.W. Gregory s SA -TA Z e-IL- -Den � -- PAs �C*-�O a-10 ;,vim m (XAO-47U, -lb acce-rA (� `ll-In m cQano v 'D cn CoLA,-T Yvt_,�w c��U���IY� o� s�-� m�Y� ��r�:� � � S� , C,oc.•-cam FRl . Serr k77l , I99 J "%$ ltvvs- �i �M S uwJLA C. �v�tc.�.• VH1R. sEPr. 3 Rb , IQ81 7:00 - 7'/,) AW-- / /1/ 3 7:1f — 7:3D Rr W30 - 7: q r h9t //// q ,wt' om /l l 13 pb ; lit Mtl--1Nf lilt 1 R kw // / I AY' Wr 4kk 1 /6 9; e42) - AW Aor A- .fit // zz my- All. *V- Imr L.b IA!/ f - / a AW-' A*- // /2 /o li - xv) /W' A#411- 17 ' !1>/' Nr low MW ZD i#t' Mft— / p Aw //.'D� - /l,i� M"r till 9 11,/ i - 11: 3a l /ri/ OH -4W AS- W 11: 3 d - /1: v) /z: o-b r r- r/rr /err err , w Awl- fit- Hit _ J tr err- mot- JJ6W z a Mi - /err � /S /D Olt- I! 7 / H — > /1 Ayt. mIt z D /2. Z: ff l - ROD lit- Nif-lit :1 �.�rr' r mot- err l 2-d 3;/fl/1ly.- 111 t /9 Mt!" Il 7 Ntf Jilt- I�rr .1 i 2 / b 3'Va 1 Alt Ale- 4e /I zz, y:/ i - y:3n 1>II 9 Ott- " fit- !.✓�r� 1 r�� loy 4*Y 5N J �/ t - ¢ 1 Ql kt1 -lift I r I 4e -kr- � 9J I 4m -AW ZT /1l 711,1I - 4-Ott h ; 1 -Alt b/ I In -*tt 4Ht -hW Il/1 -fl!I / II-44tr-44t't III -+fti 44-W 4+ir 4tV 4117 Q 1 4- N Q E ; z - ;1' Z S -lffl Q l,41W Ho � �, Z z / I/ -•�fh' --fit' 1 4411 -mac -4+ti hp Q v ; 7 Q z .4YY -631t Al -PN . l e 0- 7 t I-4-tt/ .- lfl -AW z IN -#tI Z Z i1 -++fit +fit --�w 4w �✓ - t -LO i -tw ep ; z 1 - -jh ; tr c2 Z 4w 4# w .off r t// -Hti �(h I/ - Q j ; I % -ZZ !/ JFM -H' 4Ftr kw l itl -l}t1 Q f ; /l - - /,' II 6 ►III 'un Q t Jw Q / -4kfl -Ad 4ttt P/ 4e L / I/-AH 4w -1/// Q£; 0I - -Y'0 / Z/ ; h; b - QF" 72 // -*rI Ittt PH 9/ I �fifttr -✓fl1 l / // off �ft1 bit 1 I II 4ttr-P* 4trl Q! tr 411'r Z / // Ale Qi,:,S - 4 / -tttl #tI -If1t' s I,A -- .ptt b lIll h, c- off; t 8 I QV E '.1d3s BbI ,wh t- AI iVr=- -rRID Eu FRI. �EPt^, q-M. l9B -1PUR, sEPF. 3", IqV 7; oo - -7 '/) elf-" l �, /// 3 7:1f - 7:31) 1�j` l / /mil l 6W 30 ^ 7: V i h9t ll!l q 4W7' ,AW 111 1.3 lb Alt MH ij l 1 Ay- /6 A4, /I zz AYI-1- Ay- *It- 1 9:6- fit- 4 w � Ia' Lp NN- M& Ott Hft' L r5 1 D { — Aw- A,&- Alf-Rt/'/1 17 /f Aw- /d MY- mll"_ is W-r Illl q Z : D-6 4,tr 1 if Alt' lit- IF+t k+t- 11 Z Z. D Alr- At" rt- !�f- �t ID /2:3a - l2%Y+' t�f 1►I 2 l/t>`- ll�t' !!l / 13 1,•3� - �:yr�,qr17 Nit AVIPmr- 2D Z : /i tkt l a Mr S. '44-W z b Wt--wrr 14rr Jwr ors- t 2% .emu- fit- 3: J- �3 a /11t IL 7 Ntt Jett- lftr 4 41- 1 2 /_ :3 — 3 : yi Wt I 6 Alp 4w !S © Peerless Insurance Company The Netherlands Insurance Company CONTRACT BOND (Short Form) Peerless Insurance Nationaricale Nederlanden North Ame Property and Casualty Group 62 Maple Avenue Keene, New Hampshire 03431 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, W.G. Russell Supply Corp. 1025 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05401 Bond No, S M6 94 72 . (hereinafter call "Principal"), as Principal, and the PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY a Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Hampshire, and authorized to transact business in the State of Vermont (hereinafter call "Surety"), as Surety,are held and firmly bound unto The City of South Burlington, VT (hereinafter call "Obligee"), as Obligee, in the penal sum of --Four Thousand Eight Hundred -- Dollars ($ 4,800.00 ), good and lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and sever- ally, firmly by these presents. SEALED with our seals and dated this 13th day of July A.D. 19 89. WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the above named Obligee, dated the 13th day of July 19 89 To landscape Lot 3, Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park, Gregory Drive in compliance with site plans prepared by Webster - Martin, Inc. dated 3/31/89, last revised 5/3/89 and '5/5/89 for a period beginning 7/13/89 and ending 7/13/92. which contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof as fully and to the same extent as if copied at length herein. Now, therefore, the condition of the above obligation is such, that if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly keep, do and perform, each and every, all and singular, the matters and things in said contract set forth and specified to be by the said Principal kept, done and performed at the time in the manner in said contract specified, and shall pay over, make good and reimburse to the above named Obligee, all loss and damage which said Obligee may sustain by reason of failure or default on the part of said Principal, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise, to be and remain in full force and effect. WITN NTA11.i PSB-12 big Russell Corp. PEERLESS INSURA CE COMPANY By Kimberly A. HOul Attorney - in -Fact C BY"MI Indefinite John D. Shea and/or Laura Lee Ylitalo and/or Kimberly A. Houle and/or Denise R. Metivier and/or Marcia L. Zimmerman and/or Robert M. Rooney, Jr. Keene New Hampshire bonds, undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and all other writings obligatory in the nature thereof: 1 x Form I'S 9741301-fi'l0 �7,88) yv� s AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: November 9, 2010 -November 18, 2010 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: W.G. Russell Supply Corporation PERMITTEE ADDRESS: PO Box 2221 South Burlington, VT 05403 GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER: 3-9010 PERMIT NUMBER: 3221-9010.R PREVIOUS PERMIT NUMBER: 3221-9010 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary RECEIVING WATER: Muddy Brook EXPIRATION DATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE: Ten years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft authorization to discharge proposed for issuance to W.G. Russell Supply Corporation for the discharge of stormwater runoff from the W.G. Russell Supply Corporation wholesale and distribution facility located in South Burlington, Vermont to Muddy Brook. The means of treatment include overland flow, grass -lined infiltration trench and drywells. -2- FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application is on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records and may be obtained by calling 802-241-3777 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed authorization to discharge are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) November 18, 2010, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Attention Vicki Hill, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671 or send via email to Stormwater@state.vt.us. If sending by mail, the general permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the general permit number should appear on the subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered by DEC prior to issuance of an authorization to discharge under the general permit. FINAL ACTION/APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny an authorization to discharge under the general permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims parry status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660) Justin G. Johnson, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation PLANNER 658-7955 e City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 June 25, 1992 William Russell Russell Supply P.O. Box 2221 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Landscaping Bond, 9 Gregory Drive Dear Mr.Russell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that the City of South Burlington is satisfied that you have met the landscaping requirements related to the construction of the building at 9 Gregory Drive. Accordingly we are releasing you from your obligation under bond #S-M6-94-72 which is set to expire on 7/13/92. If you have any questions, please let me know. Since ly, Q /� Raymof�d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant. 01 RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 658-7958 June 25, 1992 William Russell Russell Supply P.O. Box 2221 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Landscaping Bond, 9 Gregory Drive Dear Mr.Russell: Please be advised that the City of South Burlington is satisfied that you have met the landscaping requirements related to the construction of the building at 9 Gregory Drive. Accor_dingly we are releasing you from your obligation under bond 4S-M6-94-72 t which is set to expire on 7/13/92. If you have any questions, please let me know. Since ly, Raymor5d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 8, 1990 William Russell Russell Supply P.O. Box 2221 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Landscaping at 9 Gregory Drive Dear Mr. Russell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I inspected your property at 9 Gregory Drive on November 7, 1990 for conformance with the approved landscaping plan. I found that the landscaping improvments made were in substantial agreement with the approved plan. I will periodically inspect the landscaping between the spring of 1991 and the expiration of the bond on July 13, 1992. During this period you would be expected to replace any plants which do not survive. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Raymo�id J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 August 8, 1990 William Russell Russell Supply P.O. Box 2221 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Landscaping at 9 Gregory Drive Dear Mr. Russell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is to confirm our discussion of yesterday, August 7, 1990 relating to the planting of your required landscaping. It is my understanding that you will complete all landscaping as per the approved plan by no later than November 1, 1990. Please be reminded that you issued a bond (#5-M6-94-72) in the amount of $4,800.00 on July 13, 1989 to the City to landscape your property on Gregory Drive. It is the City's intent to use this bond to complete any landscaping not completed by November 1, 1990. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Raym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant. RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 February 7, 1990 Russell Supply 1025 Airport Drive P.O. Box 2221 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Russell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl 16 CITY OF SOI T11 BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD ( name , add ress , phone # ) Russell Supply -Corp. 1025 Airport Drive, P.O. Box 2221, So. Burlington, VT 05403 863-1177 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) Same 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) William G_Russell Same address and 4 ) . PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: #9 Gregory Drive, So. Burlington, VT _ 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 3 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Wholesale Supply -and Distribution 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) Building 10,333 Sq. Ft.; 1 Unit: Max. Height 14 Ft.; 1 Floor 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 10 9).LOT COVERAGE: building 20 %; landscaped areas 28 % building, parking, outside storage 52 % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 160,000 , Landscaping $7,500_ Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $90,000 Grading, Paving, Drainage. 11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 09/01/89 _ 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 112 **Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon _; 12-1p.m. _ ; 1-2 p.m. 2-3 3-4 p.m._ 4-5 p.m.____; 5-6 p.m. _; 6-7 p.m. 1 ;3 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: No specific peak hours. 1 4 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION : _spe ific peak 1 03/31 /89 ----- ---- _ _.. _ �C2� !! - - - —.. _.-.� DATE OF SUBMISSION GNA'Tll DATE OF IIEAR I NG ** AM PEAK HOUR: 21 Enter � L'-4 } PM PEAT: HOUR: 3 Enter 20 Exit 23 Total ATTACHMENT #1 RUSSELL SUPPLY CORP. Site Plan Application List of Adjoining Property Owners 1. Bruce P. Barry 20 Landing Ave. Colchester, VT 05446 2. Crawford W. Gregory Judith T. Gregory Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 3. RPM Development Co. Paul L. Marquis 5 Gregory Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 4. Green Tree Park, Inc. John K. Desmond, Jr. 123 Industrial Avenue Williston, VT 05495 5. Vermont Boiler Specialists, Inc. 11 Gregory Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 City of _ . ,..,L Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL.(802) 658-7953 I April 24, 1989 District Environmental Offices District #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Attn: Ernie Christianson Re: Russell Supply Lot #2, Green Tree Park South Burlington Dear Ernie: i OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER WILLIAM 1. SZYMANSKI The above referenced project will be served by the municipal water and sewer system. The usage is estimated at 150 g.p.d. This amount can be supplied by the City. The sewage will be treated at our Airport Parkway Treatment Plant which has sufficient reserve capacity to treat this volume. Very truly ours, William Jty manski City Manager WJS/b .� cc: Jack Myers, Webster -Martin Inc. State of Vermont T LAND USE PERMIT AMENDMENT CASE NO 4CO437-8 APPLICANT W. G. Russell Supply Corp. ADDRESS P.O. Box 2221 So. Burlington, VT 05403 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A., CHAPTER 151 (Act 250) and Vermont State Environmental Protec- tion Rules Chapter 4, Public Buildings Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal Chapter 8, Water Supply District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0437-8, pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 272, Page 50, of the land records of the Town of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to W. G. Russell Supply Corporation, the "Permittee" as "grantee". This permit specifically authorizes the Permittee to construct a 10,333 square foot wholesale/distribution facility on Lot #3 of the Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park located off Gregory Drive in South Burling- ton, Vermont. The project shall utilize municipal water and sewer services. The Permittee, and its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate, and maintain the pro- ject as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All the conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0437 and amendments are in full force and effect, except as amended herein. 2. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained as set forth in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Ap- proved" and on file with the District Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. Page 2 Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0437-8 3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing juris- diction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accor- dance with the terms of the permit. 4. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittee confirms and agrees for himself and all assigns and successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall run wi th the 1 and and the 1 and uses herei n permi tted, and wi 11 be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and all as- signs and successors in interest. 5. The project is approved for the following maximum cumulative impacts: 24 vehicle parking spaces; 150 gallons per day of water and wastewater; 112 vehicle trips per day; 24 peak hour vehicle trips. 6. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit #WW-4-0151 issued on August 22, 1989 by the Regional Engineer, Division of Protection, Department of Environmental Conservation, Agency of Natural Resources. Conditions of said permit are as follows: (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project No. 06-8906 Drawing No. 1 "Site Plan" dated 3/31/89 revised 5/3/89 and Drawing No. 3 "Details" dated 3/31/89 prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (5) The project is approved for water supply by construction and utilization of the municipal water service depicted on the approved plans. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection. (6) The project is approved for connection to the South Burlington Airport Parkway wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 150 gallons of sewage per day. 7. The Permittee shall apply and maintain water and/or calcium chloride on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. Page 3 Lard Use Permit Amendment #4CO437-8 8. Prior to commencement of construction the Permittee shall file either an amended Discharge Permit issued by the Agency of Natural Resources or evidence that such an amended permit is not required. 9. The building approved herein is not approved for any manufac- turing use or the on -site disposal of any process wastes. The Permittee shall apply and receive approval for any change in the use of the buildings which involves the storage or handling of any regulated substances or the generation of hazardous wastes. 10. The installation of floor drains is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 11. The Permittee shall apply to the District Environmental Commis- sion for approval for any change in the use of the building and land which would cause noxious or unhealthy emissions into the air or injection of toxic wastes into the soils. 12. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall install and maintain water conserving plumbing fixtures. The plumbing fixtures shall operate with the following specifica- ti ons: (1) internal system water pressure of 50 psi maximum, (2) toilets with a maximum of 3.5 gallons per flush, (3) showerheads operating with a maximum of 3 gallons per minute, and (4) faucets on sinks and 1 ays shall operate at a maximum of 3 gallons per mi nute. An alternative water conservation plan may be presented to the Commission for approval before implementation. The ap- proved alternate shall be implemented and maintained by the Permittee for the duration of the permit. 13. The Permittee shall comply with Exhibits #20 and #21 for erosion control. Hay bale dams and silt fences shall be installed as depicted on the plans prior to commencement of construction. The Permittee shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. All disturbed areas of the construction site shall be stabilized, seeded and mulched wi thi n 1 to 14 days of i ni ti al di sturbance, and pri or to October 1, to ensure proper stabilization of disturbed soils. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, re- placed and maintained until vegetati of n is permanently estab- lished on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission re- serves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as they deem ne- cessary. 14. In addition to conformance with the requirements of condition #13, the Permittee shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge Page 4 Land Use Permit Amendment #46O437-8 of waste materials into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittee from compliance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 15. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall continually maintain the landscaping as approved in Exhibit #17 by replacing any dead or diseased plantings as soon as seasonably possible. 16. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those approved in Exhibits #12 & #25, and shall be mounted no higher than 20 feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. All exterior lights except those necessary for security purposes shall remain on only during working hours. This District Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and impose further conditions regarding exterior lighting for a period of one year from the issuance date. 17. The exterior sign shall be installed as depicted in Exhibit #24. 18. All heated structures approved herein shall be constructed with insulation to comply with the ASHRAE 90-80 standards. In addition, the building will incorporate energy conservation measures as specified in Exhibit #32, a letter from Jon B. Leinwohl, engineer for the Permittee, and Stuart Slote, Vermont Public Service Department. 19. The installation and or use of electric resistance space heating is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 20. All construction on this project must be completed by October 15, 1990. 21. This permit shall expire on October 15, 2020 unless extended by the District Commission. Notwithstanding, this permit shall expire one year from date of issuance if the Permittee have not demonstrated an intention to proceed with the project. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 6090(b). Page 5 Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0437-8 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 8th day of September, 1989. Y W. G. Livingston, Chairman District #4 Commission Commissioners participating in Louis Bori e this decision: District #4 Coordinator Lynn Whalen EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION # E D R E X A E N H T C T I E E E B I R I V E T E D D N B 0. Y 1 7/7/89 1 A 2 „ „ 3 it if 4 " 5 " 6 " 7 „ W 8 it „ 9 ,t „ 10 if „ 11 it" 16 1 " 4CO437-8 A=APPLICANT T=TOWN TPC=TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION RPC=REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AEC=AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NATURE OF EXHIBIT DATE ENTERED Master Land Use Permit Application (7/6/89) Certificate of service & cost (7/6/89) Notice: Commencement of construction requires a permit (7/6/89) Schedule B - Act 250 Information (6/28/89) prepared by Jon B. Leinwohl Location map List of adjoining property owners Document entitled " Specifications" - specifications for water system,sanitary sewer system specifications, minimun test time for various pipe sizes, stormwater specifications, environmental considerations, dust control specidiciations, lawn & grassed ares, paving & surfacing, cement concrete curb, cement, cement concrete sidewalk, Letter from South Burlington City MAnager regarding water & sewer allocations (4/24/89) Vehicular Trip Generation Data by Roger Dickinson, Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. 3/30/89 South Burlington Planning Commission Minutes regarding project approval (5/30/89 Protective Covenants , Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park 5/6/1980 Exterior lighting catalog cuts Building Color chip Letter from Champlain Water District 5/3/89 Letter from City Planner, South Burlington, regarding conformance with City's comprehensive plan Plan:site plan 3/31/89, by Webster -Martin, Inc. last revised 5/03/89 Plan: planting plan, 5/5/89 plan: details, 3/31/89 Plan: misc. details 5/3/89 Plan:soil erosion and sediment control plan 3/31/89 EXHIBIT LIST F( E D R E X A E N H T C T I E E E B I R I V E T E D D N B 0. Y 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 7/7/89 A it v 11 I it )R APPLICATION # 7/31/89 A AOT 3/1/89 ANR 8/8/89 APS 8/28/89 ANR 8/30/89 8/30/89 ® "A�m 4CO437-8 page2 A=APPLICANT T=TOWN TPC=TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION RPC=REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AEC=AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NATURE OF EXHIBIT DATE ENTERED Plan: soil erosion and sediment control details and specifications 3/31/89 Plan: elevations & specifications 6/28/89 Plan: plumbing details, etc., 6/28/89 Rendering - sign Cutsheet - ballard light fixtures Document: List of materials to be stored AOT comments Draft - Stormwater Discharge Permit Memo -regarding criteria 9(F) 9 (J) Water Supply & Wastewater Permit #WW-4-0151 by Ernest P. Christianson, ANR(8/22/89) Letter by John J. Hamilton, Director of Aviation, Burlington International Airport (8/15/89) Letter by Jon B. Leinwohl, Webster -Martin, Inc. to Stuart Slote. Dept. of Public Service(8/17/89) Memorandum by Stuart Slote, Dept. of Public Service to District #4 Commission (8/18/89) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Louis Bori e, District Coordinator for the # 4 District of the Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0437-8 by U.S. Mail, postage paid, on this 8th day of September, 1989 to the following: W.G. Russell Supply Corp. P.O. Box 2221 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Jon B. Lei nwohl Webster -Martin, Inc. P.O. Box 2246 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Margaret Picard, Town Clerk 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Chairman, Board of Selectman c/o Town Clerk's Office 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Chairman, Town Planning Commission c/o Town Clerk's Office 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Mark Sinclair, Esq. Representative, State Agencies Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - 2 Center Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental M. Lynn Whalen Gil Livingston 111 West Street Commission Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Page 2 Certificate of Service: Land Use Permit Amendment #4CO437-8 Regional Engineer Ernie Christiansen 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Health Department 60 Main Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 8th day of September 1989. By C/ t.Sl �.cei lTiLj�J Louis Borie District #4 Coordinator 4CO437-8.CS/br WEBSTER-MARTIN, INC. P. 0. Box 2246 SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05401-2246 Q s�_-1 s JPi2 ELIETT ° MUSEUTTIL (802) 864-0223 TO Ci 7 ar= _<a • WE ARE SENDING YOU K Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter DATE ATTENTION RE: he following items: ❑ Prints L'4' Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order e 4--r ZSG Pmr7r /i�Tla COPIES NO. DESCRIPTION /DATE .�-� cf2 tick • G t2c�� G.��f`•'• �•E-�.t.- PAC—, � � J� ��c� L�2 t �E �• .CSc� fc' L- r t.aG'Cz�.v , �"' THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: REMARKS ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit_. copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment lI )-Zl Y60Z `Ti7L1:5z 14:> �lS�1 5 LJI FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US CAS /'_3o7C— 794C-- 'S� Sri" .�.lc�• ���,��. eMe COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-3 jivses Inc., GMW, Man. 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 1013 L—C I iV 30 &) L_ ' A. BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT August 15, 1980 11s. Carrie 11auhs-?ugh Assistant District #4 Coordinator Department of Environmental Conservation 111 West. Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 RE: Act 250 Notice #4CO437-8 Dear Hs. Hauhs-Pugh, On behalL of the Burlington International Airport, I wish to offer the following comments on the Act 250 application for a proposed warehouse ott Gregory Drive, South Burlington. I. Due to the proximity of the proposed development by Russell Supply to the Burlington Airport, this site is subject to varying levels of noise associated with aviation activities including the taking off and landing of aircraft, airplane overflights, aircraft taxi operations and airport ground and service vehicles. 2. The airport is open on a 24 hour basis, with resulting noise Associated with such aviation activity. The developers, proposed purchasers and tenants of this property should be aware that noise abatement measures such as additional wall .insulation and thermal windows and doors may decrease the inconvenience caused by these aviation related activities. rA While the airport has no specific objections to this pioject, we would appreciate the cooperation of the District. Environmental Coxmnission in notifying the applicant thaO sound mitigation measures would. be beneficial to the future occupants of the buildings. Due to the proximity of the proposed site to the Burlington International Airport, the use of large cranes during construc- tion may intrude into navigable airspace, as defined by Federal Aviation Regulations Part Ti. In order to ascertain whether or not such construction equipment may pose an obstacle to air trattic, FAA Regulations require that "Notice of proposed construction or alteration, Form 7460-1" be tiled with the FAA kegi.onal Oltice. I would appreciate that the developer complete the torn► attached & forward a copy to both the FAA (New England Region) and my office. If you need further infonnation on the above, please advise. Sincerely, John � . ti�uni Lton Director of Aviation GWD : J ] 1 CC: Richard Ward, So. Burlington Zoning Administrator kussell Supply, So. Burlington Before completing this form it t:, ,--amended that the following excerpts from lht, Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77, Subchaptur B beluw be reviewed. USE BACK OF THIS SHEET AS WORKSHEET NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONS §77.13 Construction or alteration requiring notice. (a) Except as provided in §77.15, each sponsor who proposes any of the following construction or alteration shall notify the Administrator in the form and manner prescribed in §77.17: (1) Anyconstruction oralteration of more than 200 feet in height above the ground level at its site. (2) Any construction or alteration of greater height than an imaginary surface extending outward and upward at one of the following slopes: (i) 100 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 20,000 feet from the nearest point of the nearest runway of each airport specified in subparagraph (5) of [his paragraph with at leastone runway more than 3,200 feet in actual length, excluding heliports. (u) 50 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 10,000 feet from the nearest point of the nearest runway of each airport specified in subparagraph (5) of this paragraph with its longest runway no more than 3,200 feet in actual length, excluding heliports. (iii) 25 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet from the nearest point of the nearest landing and takeoff area of each heliport specified in subparagraph (5) of this paragraph. (3) Any highway, railroad, or other traverse way for mobile objects, of a height which, if adjusted upward 17 feet foran Interstate Highway that is part of the National System of Military and Interstate Highways where overcrossings are designed for a Minimum of 17 feet vertical distance, 15 feet for any other public roadway, 10 feel or the height of the highest mobile object that would normally traverse the road, whichever is greater, for a private road. 23 feel for a railroad, and for a waterway or any other traverse way not previously mentioned, an amount equal to the height of the highest mobile object that would normally traverse it, would exceed a standard of subparagraph (1) or (2) of this paragraph. (4) When requested by the FAA, anyconstruction or alteration that would be inan instrument approach area (defined in the FAA standards governing instrument approach procedures) and available information indicates it might exceed a standard of Subpart C of this part. (5) Any construction or alteration on any of the following airports (including heliports): (i) An airport that is available for public use and is listed in the Airport Directoryof the current Airman's Information Manual or in either the Alaska or Pacific Airman's Guide and Chart Supplement. (ii) An airport under construction, that is the subject of a notice or proposal on file with the Federal Aviation Administration, and except for military airports, it is clearly indicated that that airport will be available for public use. (iii) An airport that is operated by an armed force of the United States. (b) Each sponsor who proposes construction or alteration that is the subject of a notice under paragraph (a) of this section and isadvised by an FAA regional office that a supplemental notice is required shall submit that notice on a prescribed form to be received by the FAA regional office at least 48 hours before the start of the construction or alteration. (c) Each sponsor who undertakes construction or alteration that is the subject of a notice under paragraph (a) of this section shall, within 5 days after that construction or alteration reaches its greatest height, submit a supplemental notice on a prescribed form to the FAA regional office having jurisdiction over the area involved, if— (1) The construction or alteration is more than 200 feet above the surface level of its site; or (2) An FAA regional office advises him that submission of the form is required. Alaskan Region AK Alaskan Regional Office Air Traffic Division AAL-530 701 "C Street Anchorage, AK 99513 Mail Address: 701 "C" Street, Box 14 Anchorage, AK 99513 Tele. 907-271-5892 TRUCTION/OR ALTERATION §77.15 Construction or alteration not requiring notice. No person is required to notify the Administrator for any of the following construction or alteration: (a) Any object that would be shielded by existing structures of a permanent and substantial character or by natural terrain or topographic features of equal or greater height, and would be located in the congested area of a city, town, or settlement where it is evident beyond all reasonable doubt that the structure so shielded will not adversely affect safety in air navigation. (b) Anyantenna structt)re of 20 feetor less in height except one that would increase the height of another antenna structure. (c) Any air navigation facility, airport visual approach or landing aid, aircraft arresting device, or meteorological device, of a type approved by the Administrator, or an appropriate military service on military airports, the location and height of which is fixed by its functional purpose. (d) Any construction or alteration for which notice is required by any other FAA regulation. §77.17 Form and time of notice. (a) Each person who is required to notify the Administrator under §77.13 (a) shall send one executed form set of FAA Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration, to the Manager, Air Traffic Division, FAA Regional Office having jurisdiction over the area within which the construction or alteration will be located. Copies of FAA Form 7460-1 may be obtained from the headquarters of the Federal Aviation Administration and the regional offices. (b) The notice required under §77.13 (a) (1) through (4) must be submitted at least 30 days before the earlier of the following dates— (1) The dale the proposed construction or alteration is to begin. (2) The date an application for a construction permit is to be filed. However, a notice relating to proposed construction or alteration that is subject to the licensing requirements of the Federal Communications Act may be sent to the FAA at the same time the application for construction is filed with the Federal Communica- tions Commission, or at any time before that filing. (c) A proposed structure or an alteration to an existing structure that exceeds 2.000 feet in height above the ground will be presumed to be a hazard to air navigation and to result in an inefficient utilization of airspace and the applicant has the burden of overcoming that presumption. Each notice submitted under the pertinent provisions of Part 77 proposing a structure in excess of 2.000 feet above ground, or an alteration that will make an existing structure exceed that height must contain a detailed showing directed to meeting this burden. Only in exceptional cases, where the FAA concludes that a clear and compelling showing has been made that it would not result in an inefficient utilization of the airspace and would not result in a hazard to air navigation, will a determination of no hazard be issued. (d) In the case of an emergency involving essential public services, public health, or public safety, that requires immediate construction or alteration, the 30 day require- ment in paragraph (b) of this section does not apply and the notice may be sent by telephone, telegraph, or other expeditious means, with an executed FAA form A460-1 submitted within five days thereafter. Outside normal business hours, emergency notices by telephone or telegraph may be submitted to the nearest FAA Flight Service Station. (e) Each person who is required to notify the Administrator by paragraph (b) or (c) of §77.13, or both, shall send an executed copy of FAA Form 7460-2. Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, to the Manager Air Traffic Division, FAA Regional Office having jurisdiction over the area involved. ADDRESSES OF THE REGIONAL OFFICES AND SAN JUAN OFFICE Central Region NE, IA, MO, KS I Central Regional Office Air Traffic Division ACE-530 601 East 12th Street Kansas City, MO 64106 Tat. 816-374-3408 Western-Paclllc Region Ht, CA, NV, AZ, GU r Western -Pacific Regional Office Air Traffic Division AWP-530 15000 Aviation Boulevard Hawthorne, CA 90260 Mail Address: AWP-530 P.O. Box 92007 Worldway Postal Center Los Angeles, CA 90009 Tel. 213-297-1182 Southern Region KY, TN, NC, SC, GA, AL, MS, FL Southern Regional Office Air Traffic Division ASO-530 3400 Norman Berry Drive East Point, GA 30344 Mail Address: P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 Tel, 404-763-7646 Northwest Mountain Region Son JRuan Olflce WA, OR, MT. ID, WY, LIT!CO� NY, PA, WV,Ion VA, DC, MD, DE, NJ NM,tTX OtK, AR LA Northwest Mountain Regional Office Eastern Regional Office Southwest Regional Office DOT/FAA Air Traffic Division ANM-530 Air Traffic Division AEA-530 Air Traffic Division ASW-530 San Juan CERAP 17900 Pacific Hwy. South JFK International Airport 4400 Blue Mound Road ATTN: ML 8 SO C-68966 Fitzgerald Federal Building Fort Worth, TX 76106 GPO Section Seattle, WA 98168 Jamaica, NY 11430 Mail Address: San Juan, PR 00936 Tel. 206-431-2530 Tel. 718-917-1228 P.O. Box 1689 Tel.809-791-1615 Fort Worth, TX 76101 Tel. 817-877-2640 Gnat Lakes Region NO, WI, Mt, SO, IL, OH, MN, IN New England Region MA, NH, VT, Rl, CT, ME Great Lakes Regional Office Air Traffic Division AGL-530 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018 Tel. 312-694-7458 New England Regional Office Air Traffic Division ANE-530 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803 Tel. 617-273-7141 THIS, JUR WORKSHEET Form Approved OMB No. 2120-"l Aeronautical Study Number NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION ustxtixxr uafcrispaaux, F.d" Aviation Adminisrrat$oa 1. Nature of Proposal 2. Complete Description of Structure A Type B Class C Work Schedule Dales A Include effective radiated power arid assigned frequency of ❑ New Construction ❑ Permanent Beginning all existing. proposed or modified AM. FM. or TV broadcast ElAlteration ElTemporary (Duration months) End stations utilizing this structure. B Include size and configuration of power transmission Imes and their supporting towers in the vicinity of FAA facilities 3 A Name and address of individual, company, corporation, etc. proposing the construction Or alteration. /Number. Street. City. Scale and Zip Code) and public airports C Include information showing site orientation, dimensions. ( ) and construction materials of the proposed structure. area code Telephone Number F TO B. Name, address and telephone number of proponent's represi�ntative if different than 3 above. (if more space is required, continue on a separate sheet.) 4. Location of Structure 5. Height and Elevation (Complete to the nearest foot) A Coordinates B. Nearest City, Town and State C Name of nearest airport, helipoit, flightpark. A, Elevation of site above mean sea level (To nearest second) or seaplane base ol1 (1) Distance to 413 (1) Distance from structure to nearest point of B. Height of Structure including all Latitude Miles nearest runway appurtenances and lighting (if any) above ground, or water if so situated o + (2) Direction to 4B (2) Direction from structure to airport C. Overall height above mean sea level (A - B) Longitude D. Description of location of site with respect to highways, streets, airports, prominent terrain features, existing structures. etc. Attach a US Geological Survey quadrangle map or equivalent showing the relationship of construction site to nearest airport(s). (if more space is required, continue on a separate sheet of paper and attach to this notice.) Notice is required by Part 77 of the Federal A r,ialioa Regulations (14 C F.R. Part 77) pursuant to Section 1101 of the FederalA viation Act of 1958. as amended (49 U.S C 1101). Persons who knowingly and willingly violate the Notice requirements of Part 77 are subject to a fine (criminal penally) of not more than $500 for the first offense and not more than $2,000 for subsequent offenses, pursuant to Section 902(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1472(a)). 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that all of the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge. In addition, I agree to obstruction mark and/or light the structure in accordance with established marking & lighting standards if necessary. Dale Typed Narne/Tllle of Person Filing Notice Signature NOTICE TO PREPARER OF FORM 1. Retain this Work Sheet as your copy. 2. Complete and return the remaining copies. Do not remove carbons. 3. Be sure all copies are legible. 4. Print or type all items. The address area will be used to return a copy of this form. (see above) 5. Notification to the FAA does not waive the requirements of any other Government Agency. 6. FAA will acknowledge this notice within approximately 30 days of its receipt. FAA Form 74641 (8-a5) THIS IS YOUR WORKSHEET b1ASTER LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION PLEASE DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE No.:4CO437- Filed: oration Date: (Signature of Coordinator) 1. AI-PLICANT NAME: W. G. Russell Supply Corp. Phone 1: 863-1177 AdAre43:1025 Airport Drive, P.O. Box 2221 South Burlington VT 05403 2. Owner(s) Name Address _ Same as applicant Phone No. J. Bo,,k 272 Page 50 Date of Recording: 11/09/88 d. 1,ECAL ENTITY Form: Cnrp ornti on Date Formed: 3/27/74 Place Formed: South Burlington Dete reg. in VT: 3/27/74 III partnership, list names and addresses of all partners on separate sheet.) 5. PL:4SON TO CONTACT Name: William G. Russell Title: President Ad, 1: ess: Same as applicant Phone l' : Same 6. PRI',IECT DESCRIPTIO14: Construct one story 10,333 sq. ft. wholesale supply and- distribution facility with paved narking, municipal water and sewer and related site improvements on Lot #3 of previously approved Greunry nnrd TWiahtar's Tndiigtrinl Park The business will employ 10 persons. (i,, lude high and low elevations) 3461+ ; 3261+ Cht—k the municipal servict?s you intend to utilize: Road Maintenance P",I :.:e X Fire Prc,tection X Solid Waste Disposal Water Supply X ..,' woge Disposal X _Ci ty of South Burl i nugtor) Road M — Name: Grpgory Dri vP 8. Att.,ch a copy of town highway map showing the exact location of the project. See Attachment #1 9. AClii.d OWNED: 1.16 Acres involved in project: 1 . 1 6 ! D. PRo.TFC.T TO UE STARTED:—^ 8/01/89 Ccmpleteds_12 f 'l I JR l i . CuN::TRUCTION COST: $ 245,000 1 Lots: — Fee: 612.50 _ 12 ,'II<:'IFICATION: I hereby certify that the :n!.rmation in the application and the attached ,.••lulus are true and accurate. and that, for A.•: :50 pro)ects only, I have forwarded a com- plo— ropy of this application Lo each of the I�nir:e:s entitled to notice pursuant to 10 V.S.A. ;6n.;1. (Usually the municipality, the municipal .,:: 9 commissi a regional planning nnm 1. ion.) /QIB-(Lr'(/-/ ' /;2 (n) (6 R C) 11,L,l,;aWE Data Lan owner s Uate William G. Russell William G. Russell CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE A11D COST, NAME: W. G. Russell Supply Corp. DATE: 7/06/89 ADDRESS: 1025 Airport Drive, P.O. Box 2221 South Burlington, VT 05403 IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 10 V.S.A., § 6086, I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE DELIVERED COMPLETE SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL PLANS AND ATTACHMENTS TO THE MUNICIPALITY (SELECTMEN, ALDERMEN, TRUSTEES), THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION, THE REGI.bNAL PLANNING COMMISSION, AND ANY ADJACENT MUNICIPALITY AND MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOINING THIS PROJECT. LIST OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS AND ADDRESSES: x See Attachment #2 LOCATION MAP: X See Attachment #1 COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION NOTICE: X EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1988, THERE WILL BE NO EXEMPT;ONS TO THE FEE REQUIREMENTS, EXCEPT MUNICIPALITIES (SEE BOARD RULE 11). THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS. TOTAL FEE: $ 612.50 (Total of the following) SUBDIVISION: Number of lots - x $10 per lot = $ DEVELOPMENT: Estimated Construction Cost (fee is based upon $2.50 per each $1000. of the estimated construction cost) Site Preparation $ 32 000.00 Building (s) : (square footage 10,333 ) ( x cost/square foot 15.48+ ) _ $ 160,000.00 Roads and Parking Area $ 38,000:00 Utilities $ 10,000.00 Off -site Improvements $ - Landscaping $ 5,000.00 Other ( specify * ) $ - Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 245,000.00 x $2.50/$1000. = TOTAL FEE $ 612.50 I attest by my sig )Ztur that ve is tru,3 to the best of my knowledge: K!r ignature of a scant, not avant) * (for example: transmission tower, dam, well, _ecreation path, etc.) 14 O T I C E COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES' Pi PERMIT pursuant to Title 10 VSA Section 6081 (Act 250) "Commencement of construction" is defined by Act 250 as "the construction of the first improvement on the laid or to any structure or facility located on the land including work preparatory to construction such as clearing, the staking out or use of a right-of-way or in any way incidental to altering the land according to a plan or intention to improves or to divide land by sale, lease or otherwise transfer an interest in the land." (Environmental Doard Rule 2 (W . A violation of any provision of the rules if punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for each day of ttie violation or imprisonment for not more than two years, or both. (T. 10 VSA, Section 6003). I understand there is to be no site work ur construction conUnenced on this project until u written Land Use Permit is issued. I further understand that verbal indication that a Land Ubo Perinit inay bu issued does not constitute authorization to commence construction. Applicant's Signature - 7/06/89 Da to THIS NOTICE MUST DE EXECUTED ANWRETURNED MITI( YOUR LAND USE APPLICATION. CC -EH -83 ( ) SCEEDULE B Act 250 Information Provide all of the information requested below. If a particular item does not apply to your project, indicate that it is not applicable. This information is arranged according to the 10 criteria of 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250). For more information on any of these criteria, refer to the statute or the Act 250 Application Supplement. Criterion 1: -Air and Plater Pollution Air Pollution 1. Describe the type of heating system proposed: (Include BTUs, if known) : 2. Describe any process emissions, noxious odors or sources of noise which will result from the project and measures proposed for control: No process emissions 3. Describe methods that will be used to control dust during and after construction: Spe Attnnhmant #3 for dust nnntrol during construction; dust control after construction is not applicable. 4. Indicate the number of parking spaces proposed: 24 If applicable, has an application been made to the Air Cuality Section of the Agency of Environmental Conservation? N/A if so, date of application Water Pollution (A) Headwaters: N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. Does the area qualify as a headwaters area as defined in the statute? If so, describe how the project will affect ground or surface water quality: _ 2. (B) -Waste Disposals, Provide.all of the information requested below, if appropriate. If the project is also subject to review by the Agency of Environmental Conservation under the Environmental Protection Pules, attach all of the appropriate information requested in Schedule C - Sewage Disposal. 1. Describe method of sewage disposal: Connection to municipahwstem 2. Estimate the maximum numh:ar of gillor.s of sewage per day to be generated: 150 gpd 3. Indicate the type and depth of soils the sewage dis,.,csal area: 4. If a municipal system is to be used, indicate the name of the treatment plant and the uncommitted reserve capacity, if known. Airport Parkway STP; uncommitted reserve capacity ::nknown. 5. Has the connection been approved by to municipality? Yes If yes, attach a copy of the approved letter or document. See Attachment #4 6. If a community disposal system is prcpos^d, how and by whom will it be maintained? N/A 7. Has Certification of Compliance with Divisi.cn of Protection Regulations been applied for? -Yes Status: R. Describe the stormwater disposal system: Infiltration trench and drywells for infiltration with overflows to existing street storm sewer. 9. Will the project involve more than .1-2 acre c= paved parking? No 10. Is a Temporary Pollution or Dischzrg,� Permi- required:' Yes_ Status of application: 3. 11. Describe methods of disposal of stumps or other construction debris: Offisite disposal 12. Describe mef..od-of storage and disposal of hazardous wastes, if any: None (C) Water Conservation: 1. Describe the specific water conserving devices or other practices that will be used: Low flush toilets: aerator -type faucets Do deed restrictions, covenants or leases require the installation, maintenance, and cont;nued use of such devices or practices? yPs (attach a copy if available) See Attachment #7 (I)) Floodways: N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. Indicate high and low elevations of project above mean sea level: Indicate name of any nearby river or stream and the ele�,ation cf the 100 year flood: 3. Will any portion of the project (including proposed f.i?'. cr storage areas) be located within the floodway or floodway fringe? 4. If #3 is yes, is it likely that flc-,.s will be restricter? oz diverted? S. If n4 is yes, provide calculations of increased downstream peak discharge, if any: 6. Describe any storage of floatable r..aterials in the flood.way or flcodway fringe. (M Streams: N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. If project is located near a Etrear., or watercourse, prol-ide name of watercourse and distance from n,__ rest disturbed area: 4. 2. Describe any construction which will disturb the stream in any way: 3. If stream is disturbed, describe methods that will be employed to maintain the stream in a natural condition: 4. If required, has a stream alteration permit been applied for? Status? (F) Shorelines: N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. Does the project involve the development or subdivision of any shorelines? If yes, describe: . 2. If yes, why must shoreline be developed or subdivided? 3. Describe methods used to retain the shoreline in a natural condition: 4. Describe how continued access to water and recreational activities will be maintained; how vecetation will be utilized to screen the development or subdivision from the waters; and how the banks will be stabilized from erosion with vegetation: 5. Criteria 2 & 3: Sufficient Water and Existing Water Supplies 1. Indicate the estimated demand for water in gallons per day: 150 gpd 2. Describe how water will be supplied to the project: Connection to municipal system 3. If a municipal or existing community system is to be used, provide evidence that the reserve capacity exists for this demand and that the connection has been approved: See Attachment #4 4. If an on -site source is proposed, provide evidence of the location ne availability of potable water on adjacent property (indicate location on a USGS or similar map): N/A 5. If an on -site source has been completed, attach copies of yield tests (except for one lot subdivisions) and copies of chemical and bacteriological examinations: N/A 6. If the project involves a public building or a community water supply which is not a public water supply (less than 10 connections), the information requested in Schedule D must be included with the application. 7. If the project is a public building, all of the information in Schedule E Public Buildings must be included with the application. Criterion 4: Soil Erosion and the Ability of the Land to Hold Water 1. Describe terrain (including slopes) in areas where earth work is proposed: 2. Terrain slopes 10%+ from west to east; vegetation primarily grass Describe soils (or attach Soil Conservation Ser-:ice Soil Survey Interpretation Sheet, if available): Adams and Windsor Fine Sandy Loam 3. Describe nature and extent of earth work proposed: Approximately8,000 C Y cut for huilciing. 2.1 finished slopes westerly AN 4." Describe the temporary erosion control measures to be utilized: Silt fence, jute matting, havbale checkdams, havbale dikes. See Drawings 5 and 6 for specific erosion control measures. 5. Describe the permanent erosion control measures: Establishment of grassed slopes. See Landscaping Drawing No. 2 and 6. Describe the sequence of the use of erosion control measureF, during construction if appropriate: Erosion control project phasing is shown on Drawing No. 5 7. Describe any measures or devices that will be used to prevent excessive runoff.from the site both during and after construction: During construction, excessive runoff will be controlled as shown on Drawings No. 5 and 6. After construction, excessive runoff will be controlled with infiltration trenches and drywells. Criterion 5: Hiahwav Congestion and Safet 1. Describe the access to the project: Single 28' wide drive off from Gregory Drive at northerly property line. 2. Indicate the average daily traffic: existing expected from the project: 112 Unknown 3. Indicate the peak hour traffic: existing (it known) Unknown , expected from the project: 24 7. 4. Describe the site distances at the intersection of the project access with the town or state highway: Site distance exceeds 320', (the minimum required for 25 MPH) in both directions. An electrical transformer will be located within the line of sight looking southerly, obscuring the lower 2'+ of a vehicle for a very brief time. 5. Indicate the speed limit of the town or state highway: 25 MPH 6. Indicate the number of parking spaces proposed: 24 7. Provide evidence that the town or state has approved the project access: Project approved by South Burlington Planning Commission, See Attachment # 8. If construction of a road is proposed, provide a typical cross-section and profile (unless waived by Coordinator): N/A Criterion 6: Educational Services N/A per L.U.P. 4C0437 1. Estimate the number of students resulting from the project: 2. Indicate name and location of primary school(s): 3. Indicate name and location of secondary school(s): 4. Provide evidence that schools named above will be able to accommodate these additional students: Criterion 7: Municipal Services 1. Check the municipal services that will be utilized: Police X Fire Protection X Solid Waste Disposal Water Supply X Sewage Disposal X Road Mlaintenance Other 2. Attach letters from representatives of any of the services checked above which indicate that the services are available and will not be unreasonably burdened by the project. (Ensure that the responses from the fire department and ambulance service address the adequacy of emergency vehicle access). See Attachments #4, #6 and #11 M1 Criterion 8: Scenic or Natural Beauty, Aesthetics, Historic Sites, Natural Areas or Necessary wildlife Habitat 1. Describe the site (include terrain and existing vegetation and buildings, if any): Siteis:.o_pen, without existing buildings. Few trees along westerly property line. Westerly portion of lot is old,undisturbed grassed area. Portion of lot adjacent to Gregory Drive has been recently regraded and reseeded. 2. Describe the proposed landscaping (include numbers, species, size of new plantings, and areas of existing vegetation to be retained): The proposed landscaping is on Drawing No. 2; any trees along the westerly property line within this lot will remain. 3. Describe any provisions for maintenance of landscaping and other it^provements : Landscaping will be maintained to at least the minimums required by Protective Covenants Article III, Section 8. See Attachment #7 4. Describe exterior lighting including fixture type, pole heights and locations: Exterior lighting will be restricted to building mounted and bollards. See Attachment #8 5. Describe all exterior signs (include materials, colors, an(� type of illumination): One exterior sign; wood 5'2" width x 4' height, light green and white, non-illuminaated. See Drawing No. 2. 6. Describe building exteriors (include materials and colors): Metal building exterior, bronze with stone gray trim. Roof will be Butler Building's standard aluminum zinc. See Attachment #9 7. Indicate the location and description of ary trash or garbage storage areas or receptacles: A dumpster will be located at the southwesterly • •- • O- • •. •- • n. •- -l-. ••.• • �- •- Drawing No. 4A. a 8. Describe any known historic sites, natural areas, or necessary wildlife habitat that will be affected by the project: None - L.U.P. 4CO437 Findings of Fact, Item 8. Criterion 9: Conformance with the Capability and Development Plan (A) Impact of Growth: (only complete if instructed to do so by the Coordinator) N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. Does the town have a duly adopted capital improvement program (defined as a plan of capital projects such as physical better- ments or improvements, machinery, or land, including the estimated costs and proposed methods of financing): 2. Estimate the total additional revenues to the town resulting from this project: 3. Estimate the additional costs to the town for the following services: education, highway access and maintenance, sewage disposal, water supply, and police and fire service: (D) & (C) Primary and Secondary Agricultural Soils N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. Describe the type of soils (or attach SCS Soil Survey Interpretation. Sheet): 2. P%hich of these soils qualify as primary agricultural soils or forest or secondary agricultural soils pursuant to the definitions in Section 6001(8) and (15): 10. 3.___Describe.how.the.potential.of _these soils for agriculture or forestry will be affected by this project: 4. If the potential of these soils will be significantly reduced by the project, respond on a separate sheet to the appropriate subsections of the subcriteria of 6086(a), 9(B), and 9(C). (D) Earth Resources: N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. Describe any mineral or earth resources on the site with a high potential for extraction: 2. Describe how subsequent extraction or processing of these minerals or earth resources will not be prevented or interfered with: (E) Extraction of Earth Resources: N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. Does the project involve the extraction of any earth resources (including topsoil)? If yes, describe in detail the site reclamation plan (include alternative use or development of site) : M Energy Conservation: 1. Describe site related energy conservation considerations including building orientation, protective vegetation, and solar. access: The site constraints including building setbacks, access points and sloping terrain restrict building orientation oDtions: windows positioned on the southerly and easterly sides of building will permit some solar access. 11. 2. Describe all building related energy conservation measures: See Drawing.Numbers A-1, E-1, and P-1 3. For large commercial or industrial projects, provide evidence that the structure and mechanical systems conform to ASHRAE 90-80 standards: See Drawing Numbers A-1, E-1, and P-1 (G) Private Utility Services: N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. Describe any private utility systems proposed (i.e. water, sewer, stormwater, roads, etc.): 2. Describe type of surety to be provided to protect the municipality in the event that it is required to assume the responsibility for these services or facilities: 3. Include a copy of restrictive covenants to be used in deeds, or bylaws of any homeowners or condominium association. (H) Costs of Scattered Development: N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. Describe the location of the project in relation to the nearest existing settlement: 12. 2. If the project is not contiguous to an: existing-settlement,'describe how the additional costs of public services or faciities will not outweigh the tax revenue and other public benefits: (J) Public Utility Services: N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. List any necessary supportive go arnmental or public utility services demanded by the project: 2. Indicate why an excessive or uneconomic demand will not be placed on such facilities or services (usually a letter from the involved service or utility will be sufficient): (K) Development Affecting Public Investments: N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 1. List any adjacent governmental and public utility facilities, services and lands, including highways, airports, waste disposal facilities, office and maintenance buildings, fire and police stations, universities, schools, hospitals, prisons, jails, electric generation and transmission facilities, oil and gas pipelines, parks, hiking trails, forest and game lands, etc.: 2. Indicate why the project will not adversely affect any such adjacent "property: 13. Criterion 10: Ccnformance with Local or Regional Plan or Capital Program 1. Does the municipality have a duly adopted plan? N/A per L.U.P. 4CO437 2. Explain how the project conforms to this plan: 3. Explain how the project conforms to the regional plan: 4. Ex -Cain how the project conforms to a duly adopted capital program: List below or on an attached sheet the names and addresses of all adjoining property owners: See Attachment #2 L� < </ 6/28/89 signature o re Urer—" Date Jon B. Leinwohl W. G. RUSSELL SUPPLY CORP. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. List of Adjoining Property Owners 3. Specifications 4. Letter from South Burlington City Manager regarding Water and Sewer Allocation 5. Vehicular Trip Generation Data by Roger Dickenson 6. South Burlington Planning Commission Minutes regarding Project Approval 7. Protective Covenants 8. Exterior Lighting Catalog Cuts 9. Building Color Chips 10. Letter from Champlain Water District regarding Water Supply. 11. Letter from City of South Burlington regarding conformance with City's Comprehensive Plan. n.�Qua tLlme Klln a°a /; I !; " i ,:�• k� i_-_a • x`� n II W Ld NO It —01 / • 1 �� 0°'�� -cbl• 8 1 Attachment #1 1 I Quarry %xj • •'�� ate i BU NGTO �•;�/-^-. ;••• IN ATIO AIRP 720 000 -FEET Allen' r \\ n t II �„ Arm -4-925 s...a J +•, it 300 ♦ Wind il•' 1 0 cr— (� Z Win millo • /e, l \ �' ,.. L/' -IIA r� �G T` ACO uarry 5zi , 2 2 al ` Attachment 12 W. G. RUSSELL SUPPLY CORP. List of Adjoining Property Owners 1. Bruce P. Barry 20 Landing Ave. Colchester, VT 05446 2. Crawford W. Gregory Judith T. Gregory Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 3. RPM Development Co. Paul L. Marquis 5 Gregory Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 4. Green Tree Park, Inc. John K. Desmond, Jr. 123 Industrial Avenue Williston, VT 05495 5. Vermont Boiler Specialists, Inc. 11 Gregory Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 ATTACHMENT #3 WATER SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS Description This item shall consist of the excavation and backfilling required for the complete construction of the water mains and service connections as shown on the Drawings. mAi-Pri Al Pipes - Water mains shall be cement lined Ductile -Iron Pipe, AWWA thickness Class 52 of the size shown on the Drawings and meet the following: Ductile -Iron Pipe AWWA C151-76 Cement Lining - not less than 1/16" thick AWWA C104-74 Rubber Gasket Joints AWWA Clll-72 Fittings —All fittings are to be mechanical joint cement lined Ductile -Iron AWWA, pressure rating 250 psi to 12" diameter pipe, and to meet -requirements of AWWA Standards C110-77. Gate valves shall be manufactured to meet all requirements of AWWA Specifications C504-80. Valves 12 inches and smaller shall be bubble tight, zero leakage at 200 psi working pressure. Valves shall have non -rising stems, open counterclockwise and provided with a 2 inch square operating nut with arrow cast in metal to indicate direction of opening. Each valve shall have maker's name, pressure rating and year in which manufactured cast on the body. Prior to shipment. from the factory each valve shall be tested by hydrostatic pressure equal to twice the specified working pressure. Buried valves shall be installed with a valve box. Valve Boxes, Tapping Valve and Sleeve Valve boxes shall be cast-iron three piece slide type; 51 inch shaft; 6 foot trench depth. Cast-iron cover marked "WATER" and indicating directing of opening. Tapping valves shall conform to AWWA C500 Standard for Gate Valves, 3 inch through 48 inch for water and other liquids except as modified herein. Valves shall open counterclockwise and shall have a minimum working pressure of 150 psi. Inlet flange shall be Class 125 conforming to ANSI Specification B16.1 and outlet connection shall be as specified on the Contract Drawings for the type of pipe required for the branch or lateral pipeline. 06-8906 -1- Tapping valves 14 inches and larger shall be installed with their stems horizontal, shall be equipped with rollers, tracks and scrapers, and shall be provided with bypass valves unless other= wise specified. Buried tapping valves shall be provided with a 2 inch square wrench nut and shall be installed with a cast-iron valve box as required to allow positive access to the valve operating nut at all times. Tapping sleeves shall be of the split design constructed with two solid half -sleeves bolted together. Sleeves shall be constructed of cast-iron or fabricated steel, and shall have a working pressure of 150 psi. Cast-iron sleeves shall have a mechanical joint end and gasket seals. Fabricated steel sleeves shall have end and side gasket seals and all exterior exposed surfaces shall be fusion bonded epoxy coated to a minimum of 10 mil thickness. Where the branch outlet is not greater than 50% of the main size, an "0" ring seal is acceptable with fabricated steel sleeves. All bolts and nuts used with the fabricated steel sleeves shall be ANSI 304 or 302 stainless steel. All bolts used with all pipe sleeves shall upon final tightening and testing, be brush coated heavily with bitumatic cold applied material to thoroughly cover all exposed surfaces of the bolts and nuts. Fire Hvdrants Fire hydrants shall be Mueller. Centurion, Figure A-423, with the following specifications. Main Valve Opening: 51 inches Nozzle Arrangement: Two 21 inch hose nozzles with Nation- al Standard Thread; One 41 inch Pumper Nozzle with National Standard Thread. Inlet Connection: 6 inch mechanical joint Operating Nut: Standard 11 inch Pentagon Direction of Opening: Counterclockwise Color: Enameled Hydrant Red Depth of Bury: Hydrant shall be installed to the manufacturer's instructions with nozzles about 18 inches above finish grade. 06-8906 -2- Hydrant Branches Hydrant assemblies shall consist of a 6 inch mechanical joint valve conforming to MATERIALS - page 1 of these Specifications, the appropriate length of 6 inch ductile -iron cement lined, Class 52 pipe and the fire hydrant. Construction'Methods Installation - All water main installation and testing shall be made in accordance with AWWA Standard C600. Depth of cover shall be no less than five feet (5') on all mains, valves, and fit- tings. In areas where deep fills occur, the fill shall be applied in six inch (6") layers and each layer shall be compacted to 95% Standard Proctor Density. Excavation - The trench shall be excavated to the line and grade shown on the Drawings. The trench should be as narrow as possi- ble but ample to permit the pipe to laid and joined properly. Bell Holes - Holes for the bells shall be provided at each joint but shall be no larger than necessary for joint assembly and assurance that the pipe barrel will lie flat on the trench bottom. Push -on type joints require only minimum depressions for bell holes. Rock Conditions - When excavation of rock is encountered, all rock shall be removed to provide a clearance of at least six (6") inches below and on each side of all pipe, valves, and fittings. When excavation is completed, a layer of appropriate backfill material shall be placed on the bottom of the trench to the previously mentioned depths, leveled, and tamped. Temporary support, adequate protection, and maintenance of all underground structures, drains, sewers, and other obstructions encountered in the progress of the work shall be furnished by the Contractor. Unsuitable Subgrade Material - When the subgrade is found to include ashes, cinders, refuse, organic material, or other unsuitable material, such material shall be removed to a minimum of at least six (6) inches and replaced with clean, stable backfill material. When such materials are encountered, polyeth- ylene encasement should be used. The bedding shall be consoli- dated and leveled in order that the pipe may be installed properly. Pipe Plugs - At times when pipe laying is not in progress, the open ends of pipe shall be closed by a water -tight plug or other means approved by the Engineer. When practical, the plug shall remain in place until the trench is pumped completely dry. Care must be taken to prevent pipe flotation should the trench fill with water. 06-8906 -3- Joint Deflection - When it is necessary to deflect pipe from a straight line in either the horizontal or vertical plane, the amount of joint deflection shall not exceed 51 or 19 inches per 18 feet of pipe length. Backfill Material - All backfill material shall be free from cinders, ashes, refuse, vegetable or organic material, boulders, rocks or stones, frozen soil, or other material that, in the opinion of the Engineer, is unsuitable. From one (1) foot above the top of the pipe to the subgrade of the pavement, material containing stones up to eight (8) inches in their greatest dimension may be used, unless otherwise specified. When the type of backfill material is not indicated on the Plans or is not specified, the excavated material may be used, provided that such material consists of loam, sand, gravel, clay, or other materials that, in the opinion of the Engineer, are suitable for backfilling. If excavated material is indicated on the Drawings or specified for backfill, and there is a deficiency due to a rejection of part thereof, the required amount of sand, gravel or other approved material shall be provided. Valve Location - Valves in water mains shall, where practical, be located within the street property lines unless shown otherwise on the Plans, but not in the paved surface of the street or the sidewalk. Mains shall be drained through drainage branches or blowoffs. Drainage branches, blowoffs, air vents, and appurtenances shall be provided with valves and shall be located and installed as shown on the Plans. Drainage branches or blowoffs shall not be directly connected to any storm or sanitary sewer, submerged in any stream, or be installed in any other manner than will permit back-siphonage into the distribution system. Thrust Blocks All plugs, caps, tees, hydrants, and bends deflecting 221 degrees or more shall be provided with a thrust block. At the approval of the Engineer, the Contractor may, in proper soil conditions, install concrete blocks to provide thrust for water pipes. Testing and Acceptance The pipeline upon completion shall be tested by the Contractor, in the presence of the Engineer, to a pressure of at least 1.5 times the working pressure at the point of testing for two hours duration and shall not vary by more than ± 5 psi. Any defective work shown by this test will be replaced by the Contractor at no 06-8906 -4- extra cost to the Owner. The Contractor shall furnish all material, labor, and appliances for testing pipe sections as the work progresses. This will require the use of a pump. The Contractor shall furnish all materials, labor and equipment to test for leakage in the system a 1.5 x working pressure by means of test meters or other means approved by the Engineers. The leakage shall not be greater than that determined by the follow- ing formula: L= S x D x (Square Root of P) 133200 in which L is the allowable leakage in gallons per hour; S equals length of pipeline tested in feet; D equals nominal pipe diameter in inches; and P equals average test pressure in psi. An addi- tional allowance for leakage will be permitted for each closed gate valve in the test section according to the following formu- la; L = N x D x .0078 where N is the number of closed valves in the test section; L and D as defined above. If leakage so measured exceeds the allowable amount, the Contractor shall at once locate the leaks and make the necessary repairs to bring the leakage within the acceptable limits at no extra cost to the Owner. All visible leaks are to be repaired regardless of the amount of leakage. Flushing Prior to Chlorination, the Contractor shall flush the mains to AWWA Standard C601 until a clear stream is obtained. Disinfection The Contractor shall furnish sufficient High Test Hypochlorite (HTH) and all equipment and labor, and shall chlorinate the water main with a minimum solution of 50 PPM to AWWA Standard C601. This is to be done under the supervision of the Engineers and great care is to be exercised to insure that all valves are closed against flow of the heavily chlorinated water back into the in service mains. The solution of HTH and water shall be mixed in a barrel or drum and pumped into the mains with a hand pump or small unit controlled in such a manner that the HTH solution enters the mains at a uniform rate, with the correct concentration to completely saturate the water to obtain a minimum uniform concentration of 50 PPM through the main to be tested. The HTH solution must be added continuously until the chlorinated water reaches the end of the section being tested. When the HTH solution reaches the end of the hydrant, the valve controlling the inflow of water to the test section shall be closed. After a 24 hour retention period the treated water shall contain no less than 25 PPM of chlorine throughout the length being tested. The Contractor shall then thoroughly flush the main to completely remove all the chlorinated water and shall take a test sample to insure absence of coliform organisms before putting the main into service. 06-8906 -5- Protection of Water Supplies - Water mains shall be laid at least 10 feet, horizontally, from any existing or proposed sewer, in accordance with State Standards. Whenever sewers cross under water mains, the water main shall be laid at such an elevation that the bottom of the water main is at least 18 inches (18") above the top of the sewer. This vertical separation shall be maintained for that portion of the water main located within 10 feet horizontally of any sewer it crosses. When it is impossible to obtain horizontal and vertical separa- tion, both the water main and sewer shall be constructed with water -tight joints and pressure tested to assure water -tightness before backfilling. No water main shall pass through, or come into contact with any part of a sewer manhole. There shall be no physical connection between the distribution system and any pipes, pumps, hydrants or tanks which are supplied or may be supplied with a water that is, or may be contaminated. Service Connections All service connections shall meet the same standards as the water mains and in addition shall meet the following: Underground Service Line Valves and Fitting AWWA C-800-84 Service Line Materials AWWA C-800-84 Appendix A Service line material and size shall be as called for on the Drawings. Manufacturer and model number for single strap clamp, corporation stop, curb stop and extension type base curb box shall be approved by the City of South Burlington prior to installation. 06-8906 -6- SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS Description This item shall consist of the excavation and backfilling re- quired for the complete construction of gravity sewers which shall include manholes, service connections and all other,appur- tenances necessary for a complete Sanitary Sewer System as indicated on the accepted Drawings. MatPrialG Pipes - Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) pipe shall meet ASTM Specifica- tion D3034 - SDR 35. The nominal laying length of the pipe shall be 20 feet or 12.5 feet. Joints - The pipes and fittings shall be joined with flexible elastomeric seals meeting the requirements of ASTM D3212. Manholes - Precast Reinforced Concrete manholes shall be fur- nished with polyethylene plastic coated steel steps cast in place, with a 5 inch (5") wall thickness of all barrel sections, and with a wall thickness varying from five (5) inches at the bottom to eight (8) inches at the top of all cone sections. Bedding Material - All sewer pipe shall be laid on a 6" layer of gravel or crushed gravel so that 100% will pass a 3/4" square opening sieve and 80-100%.will be retained in a No. 4 sieve. Manhole Frame and Cover - Manhole frames and covers shall be of the form and dimensions shown on the accepted Drawings and shall be machined to provide a good tight non -rocking fit and have a minimum weight of 400 lbs. Frames and covers shall be as ap- proved by the Owner. Cleanout Frame and Cover - Cleanout frame and covers shall be of the form and dimensions shown on the Drawings and shall be of cast-iron construction, machined to provide a good tight non - rocking fit. Installation All pipe fittings shall be installed in accordance with Specifi- cations herein, the Contract Drawings and the manufacturer's recommendations. Both ends of all new sewer lines must be closed (capped) during construction to prevent the entry of earth into the sewer system. Construction Methods Excavations - Excavations shall be made to a point at least 6 inches (6") below the pipe invert to accommodate the bedding material. All excavations are to be kept dry while pipe is being laid and until each joint and pipe has been inspected by the Engineer and approval given to commence backfilling operations. 06-8906 -7- Laying Sewer Pipe - The bell end of the pipe shall face upgrade at all times, and be placed in such a position as to make the invert even when the next pipe section is inserted. Where required by adverse grading conditions, the Contractor shall fill any gully to make a suitable bedding for the sewer pipe. The fill shall be pneumatically compacted to a 95% Modified Proctor density upon which the six (6) inches of bedding material shall be placed. Any pipe which is not laid to grade and alignment shall be re-laid to the satisfaction of the Engineer. The bedding material shall be placed and compacted on each side of the pipe to a height equal to one-half the pipe diameter and for the full width of the excavated trench or as shown on the accept- ed Plans. Backfill - Backfill shall consist of approved material placed in six (6) inch layers with each layer being thoroughly compacted at or near optimum moisture content. Debris, frozen material, large clods or stones, organic matter, or other unstable materials shall not be used for backfill. No stones in excess of one and one-half (11) inch diameter shall be placed within two (2) feet of the outside of the pipe. Particular precautions shall be taken in placement and compaction of the backfill material in order not to damage and/or break the pipe. The backfill shall be brought up evenly on both sides of the pipe for its full length. Walking or working on the completed pipeline except as may be necessary in tamping or backfilling, shall not be permitted until the trench has been backfilled to a height of at least two (2) feet over the top of the pipe. During construction all openings to the pipelines shall be protected from contamination by earth or other materials. Manholes - Manholes shall be installed at the end of each line, at all changes in grade, size or alignment of pipe, and at all pipe intersections. Precast Reinforced Concrete Manholes shall have the top section set at.a grade that will allow a minimum of two (2) courses and a maximum of five (5) courses of sewer brick and mortar before setting the cast iron frame and cover. Manhole covers shall be labeled "sewer". Each brick shall be laid with push joints in a full bed of mortar and close joints must be made. All joints shall be grooved type and shall be fully bedded with mastic seal when setting sections. Lifting holes in all pipe sections shall be filled solid with mortar. No cracked, damaged or defective sections will be allowed in the work. Inlet and outlet pipes shall be joined to the manhole with a rubber- gasketed flexible water -tight connection that allows differential settlement of the pipe and manhole wall to take place. Inverts - The pipe may be laid into the manhole and the remainder of the base filled with concrete. 06-8906 -8- Leakage and Testing - If inspection of the completed sewer or any part thereof shows any pipe, manhole, or joint which allows infiltration of water, the defective"or materials shall be replaced or repaired as directed by the Engineer. After the sewer has been completed, the Contractor shall furnish all labor and materials necessary, and in general, assist the Engineer to conduct such leakage tests at such times and at such locations as the Engineer deems necessary. 1. Air Testing a. Procedures 1) Plug all openings in the test section. 2) Add air until the internal pressure of the line is raised to approximately 4.0 pounds/square . inch (psi) greater than the average pressure of any groundwater. After this pressure is reached, allow the pressure to stabilize. The pressure will normally drop as the air tempera- ture stabilizes. This usually takes 2 to 5 minutes depending on the pipe size. The pressure may be reduced to 3.5 psi before starting the test. 3) When the pressure has stabilized and is at or above the starting test pressure of 3.5 psi above maximum groundwater pressure, start the test. If the pressure drops more than 1.0 psi during.the test time, the line is presumed to have failed the test. If a 1.0 psi drop does not occur within the test time, the line has passed the test. b. Test Time 1) The following table shows the required test time, T, in minutes/100 feet of pipe for each nominal pipe size. Test times are for a 1.0 psi pressure drop from 3.5 to 2.5 psi. 2) If the section of line to be tested includes more than one pipe size, calculate the test time for each size and add the test times to arrive at the total test time for the section. 3) It is not necessary whole period when it the rate of air loss allowable. to hold the test for the is clearly evident that is less than the 06-8906 -9- MINIMUM TEST TIME FOR VARIOUS PIPE SIZES Nominal Nominal Pipe Size T (time) Pipe Size T (time) in. min/100 ft. in. min/100 ft. 3 0.2 21 3.0 4 0.3 24 3.6 6 0.7 27 4.2 8 1.2 30 4.8 10 1.5 33 5.4 12 1.8 36 6.0 15 2.1 39 6.6 18 2.4 42 7.3 2. Manholes - All manholes shall be tested for leakage. Manholes shall be tested for leakage in accordance with one of the following: a. Water Test - After the manhole has been assembled in place, all lifting holes and exterior joints shall be filled and pointed with an approved non -shrinking mortar. All pipes and other openings into the manhole shall be suitably plugged and the plugs placed to prevent blowout. Each manhole shall be checked for exfiltration by filling with water to the top of the cone section. A stabilization period of one hour shall be provid- ed to allow for absorption. At the end of this period, the manhole shall be refilled to the top of the cone, if necessary, and the measuring time of at least six hours begun. At the end of the test period, the manhole shall be refilled to the top of the cone measuring the volume of water added. This amount shall be converted to a 24-hour rate and the leakage determined on the basis of depth. The leakage for each manhole shall not exceed one gallon per vertical foot for a 24-hour period for exfiltration and there shall be no visible infiltration. b. Vacuum Test - This method of testing manholes for leakage involves the use of a device for sealing the top of the manhole cone section and pumping the air out the manhole, creating a vacuum and holding this vacuum for a prescribed period of time. The procedure for this test is as follows: 1) All lifting holes and exterior joints shall be filled and pointed with an approved non -shrink- ing mortar. The completed manhole shall not be 06-8906 -10- backfilled prior to testing. Manholes which have been backfilled shall be excavated to expose the entire exterior prior to vacuum testing or the manhole shall be tested for leakage by means of a hydrostatic test. 2) All pipes and other opening into the manhole shall be suitably plugged in a manner to prevent displacement. 3) A plate with an inflatable rubber ring the size of the top of the manhole shall be installed by inflating the ring with air to a pressure ade- quate to prevent leakage of air between the rubber ring and manhole wall. 4) Air shall then be pumped out of the manhole through an opening in the plate until a vacuum is created inside of the manhole equal to 10 inches of mercury on an approved vacuum gauge. The removal of air shall then be stopped and the test time begun. 5) The vacuum must not drop to below 9 inches of mercury within a 2 minute test period. If more than a l inch drop in vacuum occurs with the 2 minute test period, the manhole has failed the test and shall be repaired or re -constructed, and re -tested. 6) Following satisfactory test results, the manhole may be backfilled. Service Connections Pipes - Sanitary sewer services shall have a minimum pipe diame- ter of four (4) inches and made of the same material as the main sanitary sewer system. All pipe and joints shall meet the Specifications set forth for the sewer mains. Bedding Material - All sewer services shall be laid on a six (6) inch layer of gravel or crushed gravel so that 100% will pass a 3/4" square opening sieve and 80-100% will be retained in a No. 4 sieve. Construction Methods - Shall be the same as for mainline sewers. The end of the. service shall be plugged, as recommended by the pipe manufacturer, and marked with a 2" x 4" wood post which shall extend above the surface of the ground. 06-8906 -11- STORMWATER SPECIFICATIONS Description This item shall consist of catch specifications for the diameter indicated on the Drawings. Materials A. Types of Pipe: basins and pipe meeting the of pipe required and installed as Types of pipe which may be used for storm drain lines are reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), asphalt coated corrugated galvanized metal pipe (ACCGMP), polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC), or an approved equal. Types of pipe which may be used for culverts are reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), asphalt coated corrugated galvanized metal pipe (ACCGMP), or an approval equal. B. Reinforced Concrete Pipe: Pipe shall conform to the Vermont Standard Specifications for Construction, Section 710, and AASHTO, M170. C. Asphalt Coated Corrugated Galvanized Metal Pipe: Pipe shall conform to standard specification for ACCGM pipe, to AASHTO Designation M190. D. Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe: Pipe shall conform to ASTM Specification D3034 or F679, (PVC) Sewer Pipe and Fittings, SDR35, or Perma-Loc sewer pipe and fittings in compliance with ASTM F794. E. Catch Basins: Catch basins shall be constructed of reinforced concrete and shall be provided with cast-iron frames and grates. Frames and grates shall be LeBaron LK120, LK120A (for grades exceeding 5%), or approved equal. Precast risers and base sections shall conform to the Vermont Standard Specifications for Construction, Section 604 or as periodi- cally amended. Frames shall be brought to grade with at least two, but not more than six, courses of brick and shall be set in a full bed of mortar. All brick surfaces shall be plastered with cement mortar, the plaster being carried up as the brickwork progresses. 06-8906 -12- Joints between pipes and catch base sections shall be caulked with oakum and sealed with cement mortar, smoothed on the inside, and built up with a heavy bead of excess mortar on the outside. All brickwork shall be constructed in accordance with the specifications for sanitary sewers in these specifications. The grating frames shall be set to final grade only after the curbs have been completed. Construction Methods A. Laying Pipe: Storm drains and culverts shall be constructed in accor- dance with the Vermont Standard Specifications for Construction, Section 601, or as periodically amended, and on a trench bottom, prepared and bedded as shown on the Drawings. Each pipe shall be checked just prior to laying to ensure that it is clear of all dirt and debris and shall be laid true to line and grade as indicated on the Contract Drawings. All joints shall be tight and inverts shall be continuous. Metal pipe shall be firmly joined with,coupling bands, concrete pipe joints shall be a rubber gasket type, and PVC pipe shall be joined with standard push -on type using elastometric gaskets. Storm drains and culverts with water flow velocities greater than 12 feet per second shall require special design which must be approved by the Engineer. B. Backfilling: All material for backfilling shall be free of roots, stumps, and frost. Backfill for all pipe lines shall be placed in six inch (6") layers, each layer being thoroughly compacted to not less than 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by the AASHTO-T-99, Method A, Stan- dard Proctor by a'means approved by the Engineer. C. Pipe Bedding: Reinforced concrete pipe and asphalt coated corrugated galvanized metal pipe shall be bedded from the trench bottom to the centerline of the pipe to a height of two feet above the top of the pipe with material excavated from the trench having no stones larger than three inches (3") in the longest dimension. Should no excavated material be suitable, sand or gravel shall be used. 06-8906 -13- PVC pipe shall be bedded with crushed stone and then backfilled with material excavated from the trench having no stones larger than three inches (3") in the longest dimension. Sand or gravel shall be used if no excavated material is suitable. D. Headwalls: The Contractor shall construct pipe headwalls at the outfall end of all storm lines or as ordered by the Engi- neer. Headwalls shall be either specifically designed asphalt coated corrugated galvanized metal end sections, of concrete, or of rubble masonry construction. If constructed of concrete or masonry rubble, headwalls shall conform to the Vermont Standard Specifications for Construction, Section 602. All concrete utilized for the purpose shall meet the requirements for Class B Concrete as per the Vermont Standard Specification for Construction, Section 501. Metal end sections shall conform to the Vermont Standard Specifications for Construction, Section 711, or as periodically amended. 06-8906 -14- ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Erosion and Siltation Control All erosion control measures specified on Drawing No. 7, 8 and 9 shall be performed. Every reasonable precaution during construction shall be exer- cised to prevent silting of streams. The construction of drainage facilities and other construction contributing to the control of siltation shall be carried out in conjunction with earthwork operations or following as soon as practicable. The exposure of uncompleted cut slopes and embankments to the elements should be as short as practicable. Seeding, mulching or other designed treatment should be initiated promptly, and concurrently with the other work. If and when conditions develop that will suspend construction operations for any appreciable length of time, the excavation and embankment areas shall be shaped in such a manner that the runoff of rainwater may be intercepted and diverted to points where least erosion shall result. Slope drains shall be installed as soon as possible to assist in carrying this runoff. If these preventative measures should fail and an appreciable amount of material begins to erode into a stream or impoundment, the Contractor.shall act immediately to correct and prevent further erosion. Erosion control measures shall be continued until the permanent drainage facilities have been constructed and until grass on seeded slopes is established sufficiently to be an effective deterrent against erosion. Unless otherwise approved in writing, mechanized equipment shall not be operated in live streams. Pollution Control Every reasonable precaution during the construction period shall be exercised by the Contractor.to prevent pollution of streams. Pollutants such as chemicals, fuels, lubricants, bitumens, raw sewage, and other harmful waste shall not be discharged into or alongside streams or into natural or man-made channels leading thereto. The applicable regulations of the Department of Fish and Game, Department of Water Resources and other statutes relating to the prevention and abatement of pollution shall be complied with. 06-8906 -15- Cleanup During the course of the work, the Contractor shall keep the site of his operations in as clean and neat a condition as is possible. He shall dispose of all residue resulting from the construction work. At the conclusion of the work, he shall remove and haul away any surplus excavation, broken pavement, lumber, stumps, equipment, temporary structures and any other refuse remaining from the construction operations and shall leave the entire site of work in a neat and orderly condition. 06-8906 -16- DUST CONTROL SPECIFICATION Description This work shall consist dust on the project in to the satisfaction of PRODUCTS Water of treating travelled areas to control accordance with these specifications and the Engineer. All water used shall be clear and free of harmful amounts of oil, salt, acids, alkalies, sugar, organic matter or other substances injurious to plant life or the establishment of vegetation. Where the source of water is relatively shallow, the intake shall be maintained at such a depth and so enclosed as to exclude silt, mud, grass and other foreign materials. No formal tests of water will be made unless the Engineer ques- tions the quality of the water. Calcium Chloride Calcium chloride shall conform AASHTO M 144. Either regular concentrated flake, pellet or Type 2, may be used. EXECUTION Dust Control with Water to the requirements of flake calcium chloride, Type I or other granular calcium chloride, Water shall be applied to such travelled areas as the Engineer may designate. The number of applications and the amount of water used shall be based upon field and weather conditions and as ordered in writing by the Engineer. The equipment for water application shall be equipped with an adequate shut-off valve by the Engineer. The equipment shall be available at all times in readiness to perform the work at any time including Sundays and holidays upon written order of the Engineer. Dust Control with Calcium Chloride Calcium chloride shall be applied in such a manner and by such devices that uniform distribution is obtained over the entire area on which it is ordered in writing by the Engineer. 06-8906 -17- Unless otherwise ordered in writing by the Engineer, 0.5 pound of calcium chloride shall be applied per square yard for dust control. In general, calcium chloriAe shall be used on roadways under construction. It shall not be used on surfaces on which bituminous material will be applied, unless directed by the Engineer. 06-8906 -18- LAWNS AND GRASSED AREAS Description Work Included: Provide all labor, tools and construction equipment; furnish and apply all materials; water and maintain grassed areas; and perform all other work incidental to the development of new or restoration of disturbed lawns and grassed areas as required by the work or directed by the Engineer. A. Material: 1. Materials required for the work and not specifically• specified in this or other sections to be generally recognized top of the line products of the industry. 2. Materials delivered to the job site shall have been pre -accepted or shall be accompanied by Certification by the Manufacturer that the material conforms to the Specification. PPOTITT('TG Grass Seed A. General: Seed shall be fresh, clean seed of the latest crop which meets the standards of the Federal Seed Act including percent pure seed, percent germination and percent weed content listed below. All seed shall be furnished in sealed standard containers of the vendor with each contain- er showing name of vendor, weight, percent of each grass seed, percent pure seed, percent germination, percent weed content, date of seed crop and date of test. B. Seed for lawn shall have the following analysis: Percent Percent Percent By Pure Percent Weed Weight Kind of Seed Seed Germination Content 40 Kentucky bluegrass 85 (Mix three of these varieties: Common, Merion, Sodco, Penn - star, Nugget, Glade (Cultivars) 85 0.50 06-8906 -19- Percent By Weight Kind of Seed Percent Percent Pure Percent Weed Seed Germination Content 40 Creeping Red Fescue 98 85 0.50 (Pennlaw, Jamestown, Biljart) 20 Perennial Ryegrass 92 85 1.00 (Manhattan, NK 100 Pennfine, Yorkdown or Norlea variety) Fertilizer Fertilizer shall conform to State fertilizer laws, shall be granular or pelleted in form and furnished in the manufacturer's labeled bags. Fertilizer grade to be form grade 0-20-20 and ureaform (38-0-0), Blue Chip Nitroform, Kapco 38 or equal. Mulch Mulch material shall be dried marsh hay or fresh straw containing no viable seeds or noxious weeds or other objectionable material. The mulch material shall not contain moldy or decomposed material and it shall not exceed 15 percent moisture content. Lime Lime shall be ground dolomitic limestone containing not less than 85 percent carbonates. It shall be ground to a fineness so that 80 percent will pass through a 100 mesh sieve and 95 percent through a 60 mesh sieve. Limestone shall be furnished in stan- dard bags of the manufacturer showing weight and analysis. Topsoil Topsoil shall consist of a uniform natural sandy loam free from clay, lumps, clods, sods, stones larger than 3/4 inch in any dimension, sticks, wood, cinders, concrete or any other foreign or undesirable materials. Topsoil to be provided by the Contractor shall be natural, friable, fertile soils possessing the characteristics of good soil which produces heavy growths of crops, grass or other vegetation and shall be obtained from naturally well -drained areas. The topsoil shall be free from subsoil. Topsoil shall contain a minimum of 5 percent and not more than 20 percent organic matter determined by loss on ignition of moisture free samples. The acidity range of the topsoil prior to treatment as specified herein shall be between pH 6.0 and pH 7.0 inclusive. 06-8906 -20- The mechanical analysis of the topsoil shall be as follows: Passing Retained On Percent 1" Screen 100 1/4" Screen 0-3 No. 100 USS Mesh Sieve 40 to 60 No. 100 USS Mesh Sieve 40 to 60 The Contractor shall furnish certification that the topsoil to be used will meet the indicated specifications. RYRC'TTTTnN Loaming A. Strip topsoil from all areas to be graded or excavated. Avoid mixing topsoil with subsoil and stockpile it in areas on the site for future use. B. Topsoil: Material from the excavations and grading, suitable for topsoils, shall be deposited in piles separate from other excavated material. Piles of topsoil shall be located so that the material can be used readily for the finished surface grading; topsoil shall be protected and maintained until needed. When used for finished surface grading, topsoil shall be spread a minimum of 4 inches in depth over the areas designated to receive it. The spread- ing shall be performed in such a manner that planting can proceed with little additional soil preparation or tillage. Any irregularities in the surface resulting from topsoiling or other operations shall be corrected in order to prevent the formation of depressions where water will stand. Topsoil shall not.be placed when the subgrade is frozen, excessively wet, extremely dry or in a condition otherwise detrimental to the proposed planting or to proper grading. The Contractor shall furnish any additional topsoil as needed at his own expense. Seeding A. All areas, disturbed by the Contractor's operations, and not receiving other surface treatment as called for on the Drawings, shall be topsoiled and seeded with permanent grasses. B. All ground surfaces shall be thoroughly tilled to a depth of 4 inches and suitable for seeding. All clumps, stones and other debris over one inch in longest dimension shall be removed. All tillage operations shall be at right angles to the slope. Lime shall be incorporated uniformly into the soil to a depth of 4 inches to adjust pH levels to 06-8906 -21- 6.5 to 7.0 or at the rate of 100 pounds per 1,000 square feet in absence of soil test. Fertilizer shall be incorpo- rated uniformly into the soil to a depth of 4 inches at the rate of 500 lbs/A 0-20-20 and 400 lbs/A ureaform (38-0-0). C. All areas to be seeded will be fine graded on gradients with sufficient pitch to assure proper drainage and removal of stormwater. Any surface irregularities shall be cor- rected to prevent unsightliness or depressions where water will stand. Prior to actual sowing of seed, the surface shall be cleared of all sticks, stones one inch in diameter and larger and other objects that might be a hindrance to seeding. D. All seeding work shall be done between April 1 and June 1 or August 15 and September 15. Seed shall be sown either by hand operated seeder or approved equipment at the rate of 4 pounds per 1,000 square feet for lawn areas. Half the seed shall be sown with the sower moving in one direction and the remainder of the seed sown with the sower moving at right angles to the first sowing. Seeding shall not be done during windy weather. The seed shall be planted no deeper than 1/4 inch. After seeding, the seeded areas shall be compacted with a light roller. If the proper equipment is used, it shall be permissible to sow the seed and cultipack the soil all in one operation. When a cultipacker or similar equipment is used, the final rolling shall be at right angles to the slopes to prevent water erosion. E. The mulch shall be spread uniformly without clumps or bunches of material in a continuous blanket at the rate of 50 pounds per*1,000 square feet. Mulching shall be done immediately after seeding and preferably on the same working day that the areas are seeded. Mulch shall be spread by hand or approved suitable equipment. Mulching shall be started at the windward side of relatively flat areas or at the upper part of the slope and shall continue uniformly until the area is completely covered. Immediate- ly following the spreading of the mulch, the material shall be anchored by an acceptable means. Maintenance The Contractor shall be responsible for the proper maintenance of all seeded areas until the entire project has been accepted. Maintenance shall consist of repeat watering as required, erect necessary warning signs and barricades, mowing of areas seeded as lawn to a 2 inch height, repair or replace areas which fail to show a uniform growth of grass of which are damaged in any way and other required maintenance during the maintenance period. Any and all replacements or repair of damages to seeded surfaces such as ruts, slips, gullies and damage to the grass shall be repaired at no additional cost to the Owner. 06-8906 -22- Cleanup All soil, stones, sod and similar material which have been brought onto paved areas by hauling operations or otherwise shall be removed promptly, keeping these areas clean at all times. Upon completion of the planting, all excess soil, stones, sod and other debris which have not previously been cleared up shall be removed from the site and disposed of off the property. Acceptance All areas seeded as fawn shall be maintained and mowed to a 2 inch height until a uniform stand of grass acceptable to the Engineer is obtained. To be acceptable, all slopes shall show a reasonable thick, uniform stand, free from sizable areas of thin or bare spots. 06-8906 -23- PAVING AND SURFACING Description A. Work included: 1. Provide all materials, labor, equipment and incidentals required to restore all bituminous pavement and gravel surfaces disturbed by the Contractor. The Contractor will be required under this Section, at the time of initial backfilling of all trenches under roadways and drives to install and compact gravel as herein specified. 2. Except as otherwise specified restore all necessary roads, drives and parking lots according to the appro- priate Vermont Department of Highways' Standard Speci- fication dated March 1976 (including latest revisions). Vermont Vermont Highway Highway Section Section Item Execution Materials Subbase of Gravel 301.04 704.05 Sand Cushion 301.05(b) 703.03 Subbase of Crushed Stone 301.05 704.06 Subbase of Crushed Gravel 301.06 704.07 (Fine) Subbase of Blasted Rock 301.07 704.08 Subbase of Dense Graded Crushed Stone 301.08 704.09 Plant Mixed Base Course 303 704.03 702.01 702.04 Gravel Surface Course 401 704.18 Gravel or Crushed Stone Shoulders 402 704.16 704.17 Bituminous Concrete Pavement 406 704.13 702.01 702.04 3. Bituminous concrete pavement, cement concrete pavement, gravel surface courses and subbase courses shall be placed in accordance with the dimensions shown on the Drawings. 06-8906 -24- Submittals Material which requires approval of the Engineer shall be submit- ted five days prior to the date of anticipated use. The submit- tal shall consist of a representative sample weighing approxi- mately 50 pounds. Job Conditions A. Apply water and/or calcium chloride to prevent dust from being a nuisance to the public or workers. B. Direct traffic throughout the project by warning signs and flagmen in a manner providing maximum safety for the workmen and traffic with the least interruption of the work. PRODUCTS Bituminous Concrete Bituminous concrete classifications are as follows: Percentage by weight passing square mesh sieve Sieve Size Type I Type II Type III Type IV 1 1/2" 100 - - - 1" - 95-100 100 - 3/4" 74- 86 95-100 100 - 1/2" 60- 80 76- 88 95-100 100 3/8" - 62- 82 78- 90 95-100 No. 4 35- 60 44- 62 54- 74 62- 80 No. 8 25- 45 30- 48 39- 60 39- 60 No. 16 - 20- 38 24- 45 24- 45 No. 30 10- 25 13- 30 14- 35 14- 35 No. 50 - 6- 22 6- 24 6- 24 No. 200 0- 4 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 Total Agg. 94- 96 93- 95 92- 94 92- 94 Bitumen (% of Total Mix) 4- 6 5- 7 6- 8 6- 8 Gravel Surface A. The depth of course for gravel surfacing shall be as shown on the Drawings or a minimum of 12 inches. B. The bottom layer shall consist of subbase of gravel, of a thickness of two-thirds the total depth of course. 06-8906 -25- C. The top layer shall consist of gravel as specified by Vermont Highway Department Specification 704.18, except that it shall contain no stones larger than 2 inches. Water All water used for dust control shall meet the specifications as shown under Dust Control During Construction page 17. Calcium Chloride Calcium chloride for dust control shall meet the specifications as shown under Dust Control During Construction, page 17. FXFCi1TTnN Bituminous Concrete Pavement A. Subbase shall be placed on properly compacted subgrade in 6 inch compacted layers, and shall be a minimum of 18 inches or as shown on the Drawings. Each layer shall be compacted to a minimum of 95% of maximum dry density as determined by the Proctor Standard Method. B. Bituminous surfaces, including highways, streets, drives, parking lots and sidewalks will be one'2-1/2" compacted course of Type II binder mix and one 1-1/2" compacted wearing course Type III mix. C. Permanent bituminous material shall not be applied between November 1 and May 1. Bituminous concrete paving mixture shall be placed only when the proper density can be ob- tained. Precautions shall be taken at all times to compact the mixture before it cools too much to obtain the required density. The mixture shall not be placed on any wet surface or when weather conditions prevent its proper handling or finishing. Bituminous concrete wearing course mixture shall not be placed when the air temperature is below 45 degrees F. Bituminous concrete binder course mixture shall -not be placed when the air temperature is below 32 degrees F. Placement shall not begin until the air temperature is 32°F and rising. D. Equipment shall consist of a self powered paver that is capable of spreading the mixture to the thickness and width specified, true to the line, grade and crown as was exist- ing, or otherwise approved by the Engineer; sufficient smooth metal -bedded haul trucks with covers to insure orderly and continuous paving operations; one or more steel -wheeled rollers having a weight of not less than 8 tons and not more than 12 tons; a power broom and hand tools necessary to complete the project. Other equipment may be used in addition to, or in lieu of, the specified equipment when approved by the Engineer. 06-8906 -26- E. Temporary pavement: 1. Temporary pavement shall be placed as directed by the Engineer and shall be repaired as necessary to maintain the surface of the pavement until replaced by permanent pavement. Temporary pavement shall be 1} inches thick placed flush with adjacent pavement. 2. Upon approval by the Engineer, the Contractor shall place the base course of the permanent pavement in lieu of temporary pavement. This course shall be Type II binder mix, 2-1/2 inches thick. The wearing course of Type III mix shall be placed no sooner than 30 days after the installation of the base course. The Con- tractor shall accomplish any necessary leveling of the base course, patching or repairing, with Type II binder mix. Prior to placing any material on the original base course, the surface shall be cleaned and a tack coat of bituminous material applied for bonding purposes. F. All edges of the adjacent pavements shall be sawed to neat straight lines parallel or perpendicular to the centerline of the road and cleaned to provide a firm, regular and clean surface to bond the new pavement,prior to the place- ment of each layer of pavement. The previous pavement course shall be thoroughly cleaned prior to placement of the final wearing surface course and the cleaned edges of the adjacent pavement shall be coated with bituminous material to improve the bond between the old and new pavement. Care shall be exercised not to alter original street drainage. G. Prior to placement of final wearing surface, any necessary leveling courses, patching and repairing shall be Type II binder mix. H. The final pavement shall butt or overlap the existing pavement along all edges providing a smooth uniform joint. Gravel Surface Gravel surfaces shall be placed subbase. Each course shall be a minimum of 95% of maximum dry Proctor Standard Method. Dust Control on firm, solid, well compacted carefully shaped and compacted to density as determined by the Either water or calcium chloride may be used for dust control. 06-8906 -27- Guarantee The Contractor shall maintain pavement under this Contract during the guarantee period of one year and shall promptly refill and repave areas which have settled or are otherwise unsatisfactory for traffic. 06-8906 -28- CEMENT CONCRETE CURB Description This item shall consist of a Portland Cement concrete curb constructed on a prepared subgrade in accordance with these specifications and the cross sections shown on the Drawings. Materials All concrete used in the construction of roadway curbs shall be air entrained not less than 5 percent no more than 7 percent so determined by an air meter approved by the Engineer. This concrete shall have a 28-day compressive strength of 3,500 psi and shall meet Section 501 of the State of Vermont Standard Specifications for Construction for Class B concrete, or as periodically amended. Construction Methods Preparation of subgrade - All boulders, organic material, soft clay, spongy material, and any other objectionable material shall be removed and replaced with approved material. The concrete curbing shall be build to the required line and grade on a bed of gravel a minimum of six inches (6") in depth which shall be fully compacted. Forms for concrete - The forms shall be of metal or of acceptable planed and matched lumber and of such construction that a smooth surface will be produced. All forms shall be oiled. Placing and finishing concrete.- Just prior to.placing the concrete, the subgrade shall be moistened. The concrete mixed to the proper consistency shall be placed in the forms and thorough- ly tamped in place so that all honeycombs will be eliminated and sufficient mortar will be brought to the surface. The use of vibrators or other compaction equipment to move the concrete within the forms is not approved. Immediately upon removal of the forms, the curbing shall be rubbed down to a smooth and uniform finish. No plastering or patching will be allowed. After the forms have been removed, the trench shall be backfilled with approved gravel and fill as needed and thoroughly tamped, care being taken not to affect the alignment or grade of the curbing. Expansion and contraction joints - Half inch (1/2") expansion joints shall be placed at intervals of 20 feet. At intervals not greater than 10 feet nor less than 5 feet, the concrete curbs shall be scored for a depth equal to one-third the total depth of the concrete. 06-8906 -29- Curing the concrete - When completed, the concrete shall be kept moist for a period of not less than three (3) days and longer if the Engineer deems necessary and shall be protected from the elements in an approved manner. If the Contractor elects, he may apply an approved curing compound according to directions of the manufacturer. Seasonal limits - No concrete shall be poured on a frozen or thawing subgrade, during unseasonable weather conditions, or when the temperature is 38 degrees Fahrenheit and falling. The Contractor shall record the temperature daily as outlined in Proposed Recommended Practice for Cold Weather Concreting, ASI 306. In hot weather, temperature of freshly placed concrete shall not be allowed to exceed 85 degrees Fahrenheit, conforming to ACI.305. Anti-spalling compound - When the initial curing period is over (approximately 28 days after placement), all exposed surfaces shall receive two (2) coats of anti-spalling compound. The surfaces shall be cleaned, and then the compound shall be applied; the first coat at a rate of .025 gallons per square yard and the second at a rate of .015 gallons per square yard. Anti-spalling compound shall only be applied when the air temper- ature is above 50 degrees Fahrenheit. 06-8906 -30- CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK Description This item shall consist of sidewalk made of one course Portland Cement concrete not less than five inches (5") thick and with a width of not less than five feet (5'). Where the sidewalk crosses a driveway, the depth of concrete shall not be less than eight inches (8") for commercial and industrial driveways for the full width of the driveways. The sidewalk shall be constructed in accordance with these specifications. Mat-Pri al G Same as for Cement Concrete Curb. Construction Methods Preparation of subgrade - All boulders, organic material, soft clay, spongy material, and any other objectionable material shall be removed and replaced with approved material. The subgrade shall be properly shaped, rolled, and uniformly compacted to conform with the accepted cross sections and grades. Base - A minimum depth of six inches (6") of,compacted crusher run gravel shall be constructed on the subgrade to accepted cross sections and grades. Forms for concrete - The forms for the concrete shall be of wood or metal, well-oiled, straight, free from warps or kinks, and of sufficient strength. They shall be staked securely enough to resist the pressure of the concrete without spring. When ready for the concrete to be deposited, they shall not vary from the approved line and grade and shall be kept so until the concrete has set. Placing and finishing concrete - Just prior to placing the concrete, the subgrade shall be moistened. The concrete mixed to the proper consistency shall be placed in the forms and thorough- ly tamped in place so that all honeycombs will be eliminated and sufficient mortar will be brought to the surface. After this, the surface shall be brought to a smooth even finish by means of a float. The surface shall be broom finished. All faces adja- cent to the forms shall be spaded so that after the forms are stripped the surface of the faces will be smooth, even, and free of honeycombs. All edges shall be tool rounded with an edge having a quarter inch (1/4") radius. Expansion joints and scoring concrete - Half inch (1/2") trans- verse expansion joints shall be placed at intervals not exceeding twenty feet (20'). Sidewalks shall be scored to a depth of one inch (1" ) every five feet (5') . 06-8906 -31- Curing concrete - Same as for Cement Concrete Curb. Backfilling - Backfill shall be of suitable bank run gravel and shall be placed and tamped until firm and solid. Backfilling shall follow immediately after the concrete forms have been removed. Seasonal limits - Same as for Cement Concrete Curb. 06-8906 gen3 06-8906 -32- iL 5�1 + aJ� 11 iLl� City of South Burlington e nn 575 DORSET STREET {Y+ +� L ! i, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 WEBSTER - MARTIN,d&E of TEL. (802) 658-7953 cRY MANAGER OF WILLIAM J. SZYMANSKI April 24, 1989 District Environmental Offices District #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Attn: Ernie Christianson Re: Russell Supply Lot t2, Green Tree Park South Burlington Dear Ernie: Attachment 14 The above referenced project will be served by the municipal water and sewer system. The usage is estimated at 150 g.p.d. This amount can be supplied by the City. The sewage will be treated at our Airport Parkway Treatment Plant which has sufficient reserve capacity to treat this volume. Very truly ours, William J. �ymanski City .Manager WJS/b cc: Jack Myers, Webster -Martin Inc. Attachment 15 VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION ------------------------- JOB NAME: RUSSELL SUPPLY - GREGORY DRIVE JOB NO.: B9044 DATA SOURCE: ITE TRIP GENERATION - 4th EDITION AVERAGE DESCRIPTION SIZE UNITS L.U.C. WEEKDAY -------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 10,333 SQ. FT. 110 112 -------------------------------------------------------------- TOTALS 112 VTE/DAY -- AM PEAK HOUR -- ENTER EXIT TOTAL 21 3 24 21 3 24 VT: -!HOUR DATE: 3-30-89 ANALYST: R. DICKINSON -- PM PEAK HOUR -- ENTER EXIT TOTAL 3 20 23 ----------------------- 3 20 23 VTE/HOUR FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED En;• -Bering and Planning Services Attachment #6 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT I aluiy, PLANNER 658-7955 Mr. Jack Myers Webster -Martin 1025 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Russell Supply, GRegory Drive Dear Mr. Myers: JUN 2 21989, YIERSIM June 20, 1989 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the May 30, 1989 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please meet the stipulations contained in the approval motion before applying for a building permit.. Please call if you have any questions. S' rely,.. Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JWimcp PLANNING COMMISSION 30 MAY 1989 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 30 May 1989, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Peter Jacob, Chairman; William Burgess, John Belter, Mary - Barbara Maher, Ann Pugh Also Present Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Gary Farrell, Terry Boyle, Dan O'Brien, Sonny Audette, Alec Tuscany 1. other Business a) Members questioned whether the Zoning Administrator had the authority to issue a permit to allow an increase in the number of pumps. Mr. Weith will check on this..__�_ 2. Continue Site Plan aoplication of Russell Supply Corp.'for construction of a 10,333 sq. ft. building -for wholesale supply and distribution use, lot 3, Gregory_ & Daughters In- dustrial Park, Gregory Drive Mr. Tuscany said the question of the road has now been settled with the city. The applicant has widened the access from 21 ft.- to 24 ft. The Fire Chief had asked for 30 ft., but the Commission said they would accept 24 ft. White pine trees have been changed to Austrian Pine. The tamarack has been eliminated. The new plantings don't conflict with utilities. Mr. Weith said there are no remaining issues. Mr. Jacob told the applicant the Commission would like them to come back if any changes are made at Act 250. Ms. Pugh moved the Planning Commission approve the site iai, application of Russell SuDvly Corporation for construction of a 10,333 sq. ft. building for wholesale supply and distribu- tion use as depicted on a plan titled "W.G. Russell Supply Corporation, Proposed Warehouse Distribution Facility, Site Plan" prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc, and dated 3/31/89, last revised 5/3/89 and 5/5/89 (landscape page) with the fol- lowing stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a 54800, 3-vear landscanina bond prior to permit. 2. The applicant shall contribute $237 to the Williston Road Traffic Improvement Fund (Impact Area 2) bases on the 24 peak hour trips to be generated. This fee shall be paid prior to permit. r PLANNING COMMISSION 30 MAY 1989 PAGE 2 ' i 3. A sewer allocation of 150 gpd is granted. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. 4. This approval is based upon the expressed representation i of the applicant that no trailers will be used for storage. 5. The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. ! Mr. Burgess seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Review Final Plat application of Gary Farrell to revise the parking lavout, circulation and landscaping at the Sheraton -Burlington Inn, Williston Road Mr. Boyle said these are minor site revisions due to the dis- covery of ledge on the site. The revisions will allow drain- age to be handled easier now, using a dry detention basin. There is also a new proposed right-of-way with UVM. Arriving guests will not have to cross the roadway to get to the main entrance. They can walk through aisles. There is a special loop for buses. Also a UVM access to the land they own. The landscape changes involve a row of trees planted along the entryway and islands of willows on the parking lot. There is fire vehicle access between and around buildings -that has been worked out with the Chief. Pine trees have been added along I-89 and rear the detention basin area. The land- scaping is of greater value than the original plan. There will also be plantings in the interior courtyard. Mr. Weith noted that Cathy Debo of CCTA has questions about their pro- posed bus routes. Mr. Farrell said they are not sure what is to happen with the Texaco Station property. Mr. Burgess moved the Commission approve the revised Final Plat application of Gary Farrell to revise the parking layout circulation and landscaping at the Sheraton -Burlington Inn as depicted on a 2-page set of plans entitled "Sheraton Inn and Conference Center" prepared by T.J. Boyle & Associates and dated 12/20/88, last revised 5-23-89. All stipulations of the approval of 1/5/88 remain in effect. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Site plan application of William & Lee Bissonette for ex- pansion of the parking lot (13 additional spaces) at Al's French Fries, Williston Road Mr. Bill Bissonette said they have turned the parking east - west instead of north -south. The will still continue the curb and sidewalk along for 250 ft. There will be plantings 0 • Attachment 17 PROTECTIVE COVENANTS GREGORY AND DAUGHTERS INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT THIS DECLARATION, made on the date hereinafter set forth, by owners of Gregory and Daughters, Industrial Park, Crawford W. Gregory and Judith T. Gregory of Williston in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont; WHEREAS, Crawford W. Gregory and Judith T. Gregory are owners of certain real estate in South Burlington, Vermont, which is specifically described as follows: "Consisting of a parcel of land on the southerly side of Williston Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, and shown on a plan entitled: 'Gregory and Daughters Industrial Park' dated February, 1980. WHEREAS, Crawford W. Gregory and Judith T. Gregory intend to sell/ lease lots within said property as depicted on said plan; NOW, THEREFORE, Crawford W. Gregory and Judith T. Gregory hereby declare that all said lots shall be held, sold, leased, and conveyed subject to the easements, restrictions, covenants, and conditions herein set forth. These easements, restrictions, covenants, and conditions are intended to protect the value and desirability of the aforementioned real property. They shall run with the aforementioned lots and shall be binding on all parties having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in these lots or any part thereof, as well as their heirs, successors, and assigns. They shall inure to the benefit of each present or future owner of the aforementioned real property or any part thereof or any interest therein. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1. Real property means the entire land area described hereinabove. LAW 0"Icss or KOLVOORO. OVKRTON APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD a WILSON DisrHicTEPIVIRONMENTALCOMMISS ON / <J DIS7.ZT( T : Jb1hIISSION sasax Jumano", VaYONT DATE `'J O BY - / APPLICATION 1 APPROVAL SUBJECT TO l%iI RASE AND CONDITIONS EXHIBIT M b OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF DATE; ' o LAW AND LAND USE PERMIT! V L / 10, Section 2. Plat means the Plat .of said real property which is to be filed for recording in the land records of the City of South Burlingtc in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont. Section 3. Lot means the individual parcels of real property to be conveyed within the above described property. Section 4. Owner means the owner, or the contract purchaser in possession of a lot. Declarant shall be considered owner of all lots not yet sold or those reacquired by it. ARTICLE II ARCHITECTURAL CONTROLS Section 1. All plans for buildings shall be submitted to Crawford W. Gregory and Judith T. Gregory for final approval. It will be the intent of said Gregorys to assure compatibility between the property owners as to design and layout of their buildings. ARTICLE III PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR LAND AND BUILDING USE Section 1. No construction of buildings may be started on any lot without first obtaining approval from Crawford W. Gregory and Judith T. Gregory. Section 2. All buildings constructed hereunder shall conform to the specifications and requirements of the most recent revisions of the State of Vermont Electrical Code and the Uniform Building Code in force at the commencement of construction. Electrical service shall be under- ground. Section 3. All buildings shall be constructed on a permanent type foundation. Section 4. All buildings shall be designed to consider energy conservation. Proper siting of buildings will enhance passive or active solar heating. The Vermont Department of Energy standards will be uti- lized in the building design. LAW OFFICM O/ I KOLVOORO. OVZRTON A WILSON [i Z599X JUNCTION, VSRNONT uw orncn or KOLVOORD,OVERTON e WILSON KMZWX JUNCTION, V[NMONT 0 Section 5. All plumbing systems shall be designed to incorporate the use of water saving fixtures with particular attention to low flow toilets and faucets. Section 6. Exteriors shall be finished to blend into the sur- roundings and the landscaping concept. Subdued flat finishes with earthen tones are preferred to garish, bright colors or materials. All sides of the building will be required to present a finished pleasing appearance. Section 7. One sign will be permitted for each entrance. A primary sign defined as an establishment's major sign and located on the building's main entrance shall: (a) relate to the architecture of the building on which it is to be located; (b) be compatible with the building or structure in terms of the size, color, shape, material, and design; (c) conform with the City of South Burlington sign guide- lines. A sign may be illuminated only if the light proposed is steady, stationary, shielded, and of appropriate location and intensity. Generally, illumination should enhance the existing architectural qualities of that group of related buildings within which it is installer Lighting for each lot will be with concealed source and/or oriented in such a manner so as not to spill over property lines. Section 8. Landscaping shall be required and be in general con- formance with a landscaping plan marked "typical" and will be attached to each sales or lease agreement. Plantings are to be done within one year after erection of the main building on the lot. Plantings of rear border trees will be done prior to construction. Lot owners will be required to perform continual maintenance o; the landscaping once installed. Crawford W. Gregory and Judith Gregory will plant four inch to eight inch maples on Gregory Drive servicing this development. In addition, Crawford W. Gregory and Judith r. Gregory will install at — omccs or KOLVOORO,OVERTON e WILSON c ceeu JUNCTION, V[nM 01 0 0 the entry way stone planters of the approximate size of four feet by twelve feet and they, their heirs, administrators, executors, and as- signs, will provide landscaping materials in those stone planters on a continual basis. Section 9. All buildings and landscaped grounds on any lot shall be kept in a safe and reasonable state of repair, cleanliness, and neatness. Lawns shall be mowed at reasonable intervals. Undesirable weeds having a tendency to spread across property lines shall be kept under control; however, prior to construction of a building, owners shall not be required to maintain their property during the summer months. Section 10. No trash, garbage, rubbish, refuse, or other solid waste of any kind, including particularly inoperable automobiles, appli- ances, and furniture, shall be thrown, dumped, stored, disposed of, or otherwise placed on any part of the real property. Garbage and similar solid waste shall be kept in sanitary containers well suited for that purpose, and the containers will be screened from general view by land- scaping or fencing. The owner or occupant of each lot shall be responsil for the disposal facilities outside the real property. The burning of any type of garbage or refuse within the development is prohibited. Section 11. No fuel tanks shall be maintained above ground on any lot. Section 12. No lot shall be used in a fashion which unreasonably interferes with the lot owners' right to the use and enjoyment of their respective properties. 124 Dated at , Vermont, this �� day of 1980. In Presence Of: / Crawfrrd q. Gregory JudiL )T. Gregory uW Ornesi or KOLV OORD. OV lR7 Q WILSON [>t{{%!UNCTION, V.- r of Subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day of 1980. Notary Public )N ONT rd Attachment #8 Exterior Building Mounted Light Fixtures 4-2022 4-2020 STYLE FINISH BODY LAMP WATTAGE NUMBER AVAILABLE WIDTH LENGTH EXTENDS AND BASE -08 (Bronze) UP/DOWN 4-2020 -12 (Matte Black) 5" 15" 8'/4" 2-75W/R30 Med. - 14 (Matte White) �� SQUARES Two -light squares. Extruded -08 (Bronze) aluminum. Die-cast brackets 4-2022 -12 (Matte Black) 6" 18" 91/4 2-150W/R40 Med. ` have invisible mountings. 14 (Matte White) �w Weatherproof neoprene socket gasket is included for exterior applications. OL listed for damp location. For non -covered applications use weather resistant dif- fusers to protect lamp. -08 (Bronze) 4-2010 -12 (Matte Black) 5" 1 1" 81/4" 1-75W/R30 Med. -14 (Matte White) -08 (Bronze) 4-2012 -12 (Matte Black) 6" 12" 91/4 1-150W/R40 Med. -14 (Matte White) 4-2000 For Outdoor Use 5" SQ. 75W Weather Resistant Diffuser \,i4-2100 For Outdoor Use 6" SQ. 150W Weather Resistant Diffuser 1 14-2050 Roto-Groove 75W (fits all 5" squares) 1 14-2060 Roto-Groove 150W (fits all 6" squares) �'~ Y WALL MOUNTED SQUARES Extruded aluminum. Die- cast brackets have invisible - mountings. UL listed for wet location. ACCESSORIES ' Weather resistant clear . 73 tempered glass diffuser —order separately. Snap -in roto-groove— order separately. BUTLER -TONE® COLOR FINISHES <Bum r A FULL STRENGTH* SILICONE -POLYESTER COATING 'Contains 50% Silicone -Polyester resin. Attachment #9 PLATINUM GRAY GULF BLUE DESERT GOLD � STONE GRAY RUSTIC BROWN LIGHT GRAY (Backside of panel only — BUTLERIB"' II, STYLWALL" II, SHADOWRIB-) PLASTIC FASCIA COLORS DEEP BROWN CHESTNUT BROWN WHITE SAND BARN RED SLATE BLACK (Trim only) NOTE: Colors shown may vary from actual samples due to variations in the printing process. Colors and color availability subject to change without notice. NOTE: Ncr all panels available in all colors, refer to color availability chart in PRM or wall panel pages in price book for availability Form No. 1310-7-86 �1 J {"t'(`(,'CHA•MPLI1`I{A1 i E tyi. 3 lI A1TE Rya? 1. r r D i};S'TA CST -4 i' 403 QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD:. s SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONTOW1. : WEBSTER - MARTIN, INC. M;.Mr 'John T ;Myers, 'Project Engineer, )-`Webster Martin, Inc. P`0. .Box''2246. :z a -3 41025 Airport :Drive ' x *,South;.Burlington, VT 05403 Attachment 110 May 3, 1989 C Re.Act250 Review Russell Supply, Gregory Drive, South -Burlington, . Vermont 11.1r� Dear Mr Myers,. { $' i� � • In `:response`to your request for information regarding Champlain };Water j!District ',capability to supply water to the referenced ?proposed°"project we submit the following: ='1. Water is supplied to the referenced area via a 2411 'transmission main. 2. Adequate storage is located and maintained on Dorset Street, south of the Swift Street ° '_• intersection as provided by a 1,500,000 gallon storage tank. 3. Your estimated demand of 150 gallons per day ` for this proposed -development could be furnished t } by the. Champlain WA er,rlistrict without. restricting.or-encumbering its present users on I the CWD supply system. If youihave any questions 1. Sincerely, •''CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT ames W. Fay Operations. Manager cc 'E�' Blake rt D.:`'Pratt i' � 1 � R. ,'• Gardner r P`. 'Jacob W..Szymanski please do not hesitate to call. Attachment Ill City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 May 2 1989 Mr. Jack Myers Webster -Martin 1025 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Russell Supply, Lot 3, Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park Dear Mr. Myers: This letter is to confirm that the proposed site plan application of Russell Supply Corporation for construction of a 10,333 square foot building for wholesale supply and distribution.use on Gregory Drive conforms to the City's Comprehensive Plan. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 5/30/89 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Russell Supply Corporation for construction of a 10,333 square foot building for wholesale supply and distribution use as depicted on a plan titled "W.G. Russell Supply Corporation, Proposed Warehouse Distribution Facility, Site Plan" prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc. and dated 3/31/89, last revised 5/3/89, with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $4,800, 3-year landscaping bond prior to permit. 2. The applicant shall contribute $237 to the Williston Road Traffic Improvement Fund (Impact Area 2) based on the 24 peak hour trips to be generated. This fee shall be paid prior to permit. 3. A sewer allocation of 150 gpd is granted. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. 4. This approval is based upon the expressed representation of the applicant that no trailers will be used for storage. 5. The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: April 11, 1989 agenda items Date: April 7, 1989 Z) RUSSELL SUPPLY CORPORATION, LOT �3,_ GREGORY & DAUGHTERS INDUSTRIAL PARK Russell Supply Corporation proposes to construct a 10,333 square foot, one-story building for warehouse and distribution use on lot #3, 9 Gregory Drive. Final approval for the 6-lot subdivi- sion was made on 4/8/80. On 9/9/87, a site plan application on this same site was denied because at that time, Gregory Drive did not comply with City standards. The lot is located in the I-C (Mixed -Industrial) zone. The property is bounded on the west by Vermont Boiler Specialists and another vacant lot in Green Tree Park, on the north by RPM Devel- opment Company (Marque's Bros.) and on the east by Gregory Drive. Access: Single access is shown via a 24' wide drive from Gregory Drive, in the northeast part of the lot. Circulation: Circulation continues from the entrance drive southwesterly towards the rear of the proposed building. Circu- lation in the parking areas are via 24' wide aisle in the rear lot and a 22' wide aisle in the front. Setbacks/Coverage: All setbacks and coverage requirements are met. Parking: 24 parking spaces are required. 28 are shown, includ- ing 1 handicapped space. Landscaping: The site requires $4800 in new landscaping value. The plan proposes white pine, spruce, tamarack, crabapple, and azalea. The plan meets the required value. The plan shows white pine along Gregory Drive which are poor salt tolerant. I recom- mend replacing the white pines along the road with a hardier species such a Austrian pine. Four Seasons says 6-8' tamarack is hard to get. May want to recommend a more readable species. 1 Memorandum - Planning April 11, 1989 agenda items March 7, 1989 Page 2 Traffic: The applicant estimates 24 peak hour trip ends to be generated by the development. Based on I.T.E. trip data for warehousing use, 12 peal-, hour trips will be generated. using ITE trip data for building materials and lumber store use, 37 trips would be generated. Since the proposed use falls somewhere between warehousing and building supply use, the 24 peak hour trip estimate sounds right. The Act 250 umbrella permit allowed a total of 125 trip ends during the peak hour from this subdivision. To date, 92 project- ed trip ends have been approved. This project will bring the total to 116. In addition, the 4/8/80 approval for the subdivi- sion contained a stipulation that the traffic situation would be reviewed after development of 4 lots. I do not believe it was ever reviewed. This is the 5th lot to be developed. A trip end survey was conducted while the 4th lot was under construction The survey indicated that 79 trips were generated during the peak hour. The applicant shall pay $237 to the Williston Road Traffic Impact Area 2 program based on the 24 peak hour trips. Sewer A sewer allocation of 150 gpd is granted. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 per gallon fee. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Uoddette's comments. 3) COOLEY-WOOD, LOTS 28 & 29, ETHAN ALLEN INDUSTRIAL PARK Cooley -Wood Corporation proposes to construct a 22,500 square foot, 1 story building for speculative industrial/warehousing use. It is proposed to combine lots 28 and 29 into one lot for this project. This will require an amended final plat (Belter's 21 lot subdivision) to be recorded showing these 2 lots combined into one. This application should either be tabled or stipulated that no permit will be issued until the amended final plat is recorded. The property is zoned I-C. It is bounded on the west and south by undeveloped industrial lots, on the north by warehousing/distribution use and on the east by Commerce Avenue. Access: Access is shown from Commerce Avenue via a 29 foot wide driveway near the border of lot 30. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 APRIL 1989 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 11 April 1989, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present William Burgess Acting Chairman; William Craig, Mary -Barbara Maher, Catherine Peacock Also Present Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; John Leinwohl; John MvPrs; Ralph Goodrich; Grace & Ralph Aruzza, Sanborne & Myra Dow, Kathryn Hannon, Gail LeBoeuf, Raymond Jewett, Mr. & Mrs. Charles Murray, Palmer & Helen Irish, Moe Cloutier, George Boccuzzi, Frederick Hannon, Tom Heilman, Peter Pollak, Christopher Ekman, Joe Ingram, Harold Ray, Lucy Samara, John Conroy, Mildred Moulton 1. Minutes of 4 April 1989 Mr. Craig moved to approve the Minutes of 4 April as written. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed 3-0 with Mr. Burgess abstaining. 2. Site Plan application of Russell Supply Corporation for construction of a 10,333 sq. ft. building for wholesale supply and distribution use, lot 3, Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park subdivision Mr. Leinwohl said the company supplies manufacturers & contractors with power tools, etc. 50% of their business would go through this building. Most stock is shipped UPS. They do no retail sales. There is a showroom, but only 2% of their business is walk-in. The lot in question is the third one in from Williston Rd. Ms. Peacock asked if Gregory Drive now complies with city standards. Mr. Weith thought there was an agreement in place which was awaiting signature. Mr. Burgess advised the ap- plicant that the Commission will not approve anything for this site until that agreement is signed. The Commission would, however, hear the application and advise the applicant of its reactions. Mr. Leinwohl said the company has 10 employees, 5 of whom are salesmen who are mostly on the road. The site is difficult from an engineering point of view because of the grade. The building would be 30 ft. from the rear property line with the floor level the same as the street. There is a 6% slope up into the drive; the rest is pretty flat. The building would be one story metal, 14% office use, 20% showroom, 66% ware- PLANNING COMMISSION 11 APRIL 1989 PAGE 2 house -They receive about 1 trailer truck per day which would back into a loading dock. There would also be an overhead door next to that. No trailers would be on site for storage. Ms. Peacock questioned the number of parking spaces. Mr. Leinwohl said 24 are required and they have provided 4 extra. Members agreed they would rather have only the 24 and save the others in case they are needed. They suggested removing 4 parking spaces and widening the paved area from 22 ft. to 24 ft. The question of too much lot coverage in front was also raised. On the landscaping plan, the white pines will be changed to Austrian pine. Plantings near the storm water lines will be moved to another location. Mrs. Maher noted that there was to be a traffic review after 4 lots were developed. This would be the 5th lot. Mr. Burgess noted they are still OK under Act 250 requirements but felt the intersection and accesses should be reviewed. Mr. Weith will report on exactly what the Commission had stipulated. The concensus of the Commission was that it would approve the plan if the concerns raised at this meeting were satisfactor- ily addressed. Mr. Craig moved to continue the application until an agreement on Gregory Drive is in place and questions of driveway redesign and landscaping are adequately addressed. If another applicant comes in, the Commission will not use trip ends for them unless Russell Supply Corporation withdraws the present site plan. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion ap ssed unanimously. 3. Site plan application of Cooley -Wood Corporation for construction of a 22,500 sq. ft. building for speculative industrial/warehousing use, lots 28 & 29, Ethan Allen Industrial Park Mr. Weith advised the applicant has asked for time to respond to his comments. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the hearing until the next reg- ularly scheduled meeting, the intention of the Commission being to allow the applicant to withdraw and submit when convenient. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimousl 4. Public Hearing: consider proposed amendment to the South Burlington Official Zoning Map to move the current zone Approved by P.C. 5/19/87 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING REGULATIONS to replace Section 17.00-17.504 SECTION 17.00 TRAFFIC IMPACT STANDARDS I. PURPOSE II. APPLICABILITY: Level One and Level Two Studies III. CONTENTS of a Level Two Study A. GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION B. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS C. DETERMINATION OF EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE D. ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT E. REPORT FORMAT IV. TRAFFIC STANDARDS for DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL V. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES VI. APPENDICES GLOSSARY REFERENCES SPECIAL CONCERNS TRIP GENERATION RATES - ITE CHARTS SUMMARY OF CHAPTERS 9 AND 10 OF THE 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL impact; . mcp (31 4 s e4 ee s 7,L_t 1'�,2 w4v (dlvw W2-(40)�� 1w Mt"p �0 IlIrl V13 lej #3 DHS 4/8/80 STIPULATIONS AND/OR FINDINGS OF FACT GREGORY INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION For the Final Plat application of Gregory & Daughters for a 6 lot industrial subdivision on a new street called Gregory Drive off Williston Road as depicted on a plan and attached drawings entitled "Final Plan, Gregory & Daughters, In- dustrial Park, prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers and dated Feb- ruary 1980. Stipulations: 1) Driveway entrances to lots 3 and 4 shall be located so as to be compatible with the future right-of-way to the RDR property. Front yard setbacks shall also conform to the proposed right-of-way. 2) Lot 3, which may be bisected by a future road, is approved as one building lot only. 3) Upon development of the RDR property to the west, the Planning Commission shall review the need for a street connection to be provided by the subsequent developer to the Gregory Drive cul-de-sac. 4) The following revisions in construction and site details shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer and shall be incorporated into the final map submission: (a) Addition of a curb cut and pull -off area adjacent to the pumping station large enough to accomodate a service truck. (b) Water service to the pumping station. (c) Catch basin grates of type Neenah R3405-R or equivalent. 5) If any portion of the subdivision is served by three-phase power, that type of power shall also be provided to the pumping station. 6) The existing fire hydrant at Williston Road shall be relocated as approved by the Fire Chief and the new location shall be indicated on the final map submission. 7) Sewer capacity for the industrial park has been estimated at 1500 to 2UOU gallons per day for purpose of sizing the pumping station. Each lot's all- ocation of the Airport treatment plant capacity shall be made at the time of site plan review. 8) Bonding for all public improvements shall be arranged prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the subdivision. The statement "easements and roads to be dedicated as required" on page 1 of 4 shall be deleted. 9) The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days. MIS 1/22/80 STIPULATIONS AND/OR FACT FINDING GREGORY INDUSTRIAL PARK For the Preliminary Plat application of Gregory & Daughters for a 6 lot industrial park off Williston Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Preliminary Plan, Gregory & Daughters,Industrial Park, prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers and dated January 1980. Stipulations: 1. The water system shall be approved by the City Water Department. 2. The cul-de-sac shall be redesigned to City standards. 3. Driveway entrances to lots 3 and 4 shall be located so as to be compatible with the future right-of-way to the RDR property. Front yard setbacks shall also conform to the proposed right-of-way. 4. Lot 3, which may be bisected by a future road, is approved as one building lot only. 5. Road agreements, offers of dedication for the pedestrian easement and proposed right-of-way, and any other legal documents specified in Section 204.1(b) of the subdivision regulations shall be provided for Final plat review. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Date: July 10, 1987 Re: Gregory Drive Road Construction In order to resolve the road construction issue with Mr. Gregory, on Gregory Drive, I would accept the following: 1. Place 2 inches of bituminous surface course instead of the one inch. 2. Furnish a $15,000 bond for a 5 year period to cover any failure of road that may occur during"that period. I understand this proposal is acceptable to Mr. Gregory. `l 1S t l U R A N 1) h `•1 To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Jane B. Lafleur, City Plannet 9 Re: September 4, 1987 �\ Date: September 8, 1987 2) PHIL GEORGE, LOT #3L 9 GREGORY DRIVE Mr.. George proposes to construct a 12,400 square foot building on a 50,594 square foot lot for multiple uses (storage, distribu- tion, warehousing and repair shops). The applicant received multiple use approval.. on August 24, 1987. Access: Access is shown via a 32 foot wide drive from the new section of Gregory Drive which will be realigned and extended to Green Tree park. It, is not clear whether this applicant is proposing to construct the connection to Green 'free Park or whether they will. wait for Green Tr't:re Park to do it. This lot, .is owned. by C.W. Gregory. As you lcnOr.:, Gr(-.gory Drive was not, built to C'i.ty Standards and is unacceptable to the City. Enclosed is a letter from fir'. Gregory's attorney stating his intentions. City Attorney- Steve St;it.zeI noted that. the Planning Commission can not, accept this letter as proof of resolution of the problem since it has no ,jurisdiction over acceptance of the street. Until this issue is resolved to the City Manager's and City Counc:il's satisfaction, access is unacceptable given the condition of the road. Further- more it:, is required that. only :3 logs ar-(.-) permitted on a pri.vat.e dr.i ve 1)efOI-e a C:i t_y S t.rPet i s ree(I(i i r'ed.. Circ1.11.at.ion. A 24 - 34 [*ootwide circulation drive is shown on t,hr•ee sidces of:' the bui_ldin,)•?. The drivo in the back of thr huiI(ling is graveJ.l. 11;1r.li.i.rl . 'I"t.ent..,-y 17aC-ki n.g :,pa(, -es pare 1 t-qui red. The p.l;:,Ins sIIo 24. l tand:;cal i I I g : !'ht! sit.(', r't-'(it; i r eS .n 7 `.+ 1 U in new ;;:,rl(1,-(.:'Iap i.11g . 1'11,, plans shc)1: ilan.se; Dill,.„' [)oncl 1'iC)2i t.,!'•(1 1 I i.t I II. i '\. I)'a I"t id i I},, ,111.', 1 I i I illl 21)171 ovl t.l 1 1J(`;lk hoIIII „>vr t ' eII(..iS I..P:'1.':` ;:1 ! Ol+(P(:1 I'I-:)il'I t'.11 i H (1 III eI11; 1 I) I S .11)1.)I 1.(."r.tlll. 1)I til l ti ti l :r;(:' hI'l 1. l (11 n,g T tlyd i.( , ;) ' I)1'U,It'i l.e'.(l i., C' l li l:tltl li;t' is t11)r>t'Ov( tl . !'lli I) I;lrlll i ri,i unlul i 11 ;11)I,I r vrt I c)f' l '180 r t (Itl i r'. ti ( t..l'rtI 1 It' 1)("1'i)1'(` ;1�)1.)t',)\';11 l:,i lll,'• i')t.I1 1, i;.11lti i -t 1'('(1l1 i 1't'i1 111 lll;i I .. I << (,, ( L.1"1i'. It; F'(1 ( ri l' ('(%Ilii, I ' I'I'i ( I';) I i, 1 1' r'm� r 1 . Id i 1 1 i s .I;tIn1) I Memorandum - Planning August 8, 1987 Page 2 noted. that approval of lots #5 arid #6 could be upheld until conditions are brought up to par.. (Mi-nutes of 4/8/80) Other: See Chief Goddette's and Bill Szymanski's comments. 3) THE DAVIS COMPANY, 20 FARRELL STREET The Davis Company proposes to construct a 10,000 square foot office building on a 1.3 acre lot. The applicant received a variance to build the building 5 feet. within the Conservation Zone. Access: Access is shown from a 24 foot wide driveway off of Farrell Street. CircuIat. ion: The 24 foot, wide drive provides circulation along the north side of the building. Chief Goddett.e required a 30 foot. wide dr.i.veway along the northern side of the building for fire access. Plans must be revised t.o show this. Parking: Forty spaces are required; 41 are shown. I..arl!4—: tL .&: The project requires $9500 in new plantings. No plant .list is shown on the plan and the six 3 inch caliper norway maples and low hedge are valued at apprONimatel.y $2800. This should be revised prior to permit. Some credit for existing trees in the:! CO Zone might be considered by the Commission. Tr'aff..,ic: '}'his lot is not in t:he traf'fir over,.Ia: - zone. Ilowever, a $750- contribution towards the Shelburne Road intersection improvement fund is requested based on the 28 trip ends projected durirt:; the peak hour. C)ther: Sec- Bill Szymanski's and Chief' Goddette's commerit:.s. A sewer, al..1o('at.i.on of 600 gpd should be: ma(ie and the $2.50 per ga1.lon fee: paid prior to .pe1r•nli.t... I i W 1 }.,! I AM 56 1`1'I' 1"FIS 11nr'th1i` lis 1'1 I e I-e'v1:-tcd 1.)17fi)E, iri illlG Jill' lilt shituId L,r.; , n ;t itrt t.l tni,i, tili alll?lic;tti. n tlut f .; r:cl>t.i:mtli3r 22, 198t . TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 1. 2, t-�autlj Nurlington dire Department 575 Darset street �*:.>;tuth 13tirlingt«n, llermnnt 05401 4 • OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SA. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE TUESDAY APRIL 11,1989 AGENDA ITEMS THURSDAY APRIL 6,1989 BELTER INDUSTRIAL PARK LOT # 28-29 COOLEV-WOOD CORP. PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE LOOKED AT IF WE ARE TO GIVE PROPER FIRE PROTECTION: A. ROAD WAY TO FRON PARKING SPACES MUST BE NO LESS THEN 24' WIDE. B. AT LEAST 1-HYDRANT ADDED ON PROPERTY DUE TO SIZE OF BUILDING, C. THE OWNER MUST KNOW AT THIS TIME THE WATER SUPPLY IS NOT SUFFICENT FOR THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING. LOT #3 GREGORY 8 DAUGHTERS INDUSTRIAL PARK RUSSELL SUPPLY PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE FOLLOWING IS NEEDED FOR FIRE PROTECTION: A. THE ROAD WAY INFRONT AND SIDE OF THE BUILDING MUST BE AT LEAST 30' FOR SETTING UP EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 June 20, 1989 Mr. Jack Myers Webster -Martin 1025 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Russell Supply, GRegory Drive Dear Mr. Myers: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the May 30, 1989 P1_anning Commission meeting minutes. Please meet the stipulations contained in the approval motion before applying for a building permit. Please call if you have any questions. S' rely, Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: April 11, 1989 agenda items Date April 7, 1989 1) RUSSELL SUPPLY, GREGORY DRIVE 1. Curb opening shall have a concrete depressed curb. 2. it appears that some of the plantings are on top of the water main and drainage lines. They should be at least 10 feet away. 2) BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LIMITED. HINESBURG ROAD 1. A private road 2,000 feet long should not be allowed. It also splits lot 3 into two parcels. 2. The planned east -west road should continue easterly along the southerly property line at least to lot number 4 and terminate with a turnaround. The road is planned to go south of the exist- ing quarry and into Williston approximately 1500 feet south of I-89. 3. Using the center of a swale as a property line is difficult to establish in the future. 4. Road base shall have 18 inches of gravel base and 3 inches of bituminous concrete surface. 4/11/89 MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of Russell Supply Corporation for construction of a 10,333 square foot building for wholesale supply and distribution use as depicted on a plan titled "Russell Supply, Proposed Warehouse Distribution Facility", prepared by Webster - Martin, Inc., and dated 3/31/89 with the following stipulations: 1. A $4,800, 3-year landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. The landscaping plan shall be revised to show Austrian Pine along Gregory Drive instead of White Pine. Plantings shall be located at least 10 feet from water mains and drainage lines. 2. The applicant shall contribute $237 to the Williston Road Traffic Impact Area 2 program based on the 24 peak hour trips to be generated. This fee shall be paid prior to permit. 3. A sewer allocation of 150 gpd is granted. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. 4. Curb openings shall have a depressed concrete curb. 5. A revised plan addressing stipulation #1 shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 6. The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. l rel--� s (PI i PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 April 7, 1989 Mr. William Russell Russell Supply Corporation 1025 Airport Drive P.O. 2221 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Lot 3, Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park Dear Mr. Russell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also en- closed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. Please be sure someone is present- on Tuesday, April 11, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp V t-1 o r y Jd r "I V t City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 May 2, 1989 Mr. Jack Myers Webster -Martin 1025 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Russell Supply, Lot 3, Gregory & Daughters Industrial Park Dear Mr. Myers: This letter is to confirm that the proposed site plan application. of Russell Supply Corporation for construction of a 10,333 square foot building for wholesale supply and distribution use on Gregory Drive conforms to the City's Comprehensive Plan. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 90C 6,l_114�,) Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 May 2, 1989 William Russell Russell Supply Corporation 1025 Airport Drive P.O. Box 2221 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Russell Supply, Lot 3, Gregory Drive Industrial Park Dear Mr. Russell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the April 11, 1989 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl cc: Jack Myers JW/mcp I I -fFPI/ONT 30Kee SPFLIF45T5, SNc. iBILC�Nfa� _ I TZ_ =¢Grvr 'rA¢G c cp w //5'LAr-.G5GR0.' j LTG^�G¢AGG : 5?,. _ �.uLprrvG Lo✓G 2FKSE a 2-. =2o yr rA¢D cG.t¢.9<aF : ZdSe / GZpWTW w. �' 31J OITLI T C�QEGGCY -�¢crrvy zGcLr.¢GMc.+rs I / = ':�� rS.A� _ � 5✓ACES e I / 250 ir+ I / e< �42+ /SPP is r4 SPPGGS r5G e ..wCG hou5E - + a Fnv:.OyE�S. 25aWE5 o SaALES Ems_ov EES rtperQ40 PA¢er.rG 26 SPAGE5 �AeGr/vG Pa.O✓/O60 1a SPACES 3euca P. au2Y SLRLE " zc z= a rA 13 LOCg r/Or'/ Mg0 I O' -'a2 LFGErvO PQOfLLQry Lrr{r - 2.o.W, p¢ EASFMErvr ; I Z�-��cL:PM5VT >. a<r3r�r•rG �r•r rout ---ii4 --� � ` 3i2 ( I II P¢papSiO cery rou.¢ —3ia— r•.G •.�rAre¢ --wv-- \'v m /i n • - =Apvpso-o •r.Aree \ � a-� veoros<D zroar» sE wee •� �a�vesEP SArv.rna✓ :Ewre s �„eF" cam, .rv4 n,Arvrw..E O I v¢Oro5Er0 yA¢p PaoPbsEDiAsr 6aADE 392<a i_ <_cEcre.c F � r v¢ovosep �e.¢a \ F.aF ..roagrvrp P \\ r-015 AriG^/ FPCa+'1 "G/M1AL PL/W 6eF60¢Y i � A4.31S7 MCG/.'rGQS //rDUS fe/AL PA¢.L. SptJTN ®URL//•/GTOr�,UT 4�\Y\�\l1 �'�� f BY K¢EB 54 LA/v5 /rvG COr SULT/rv( f/vGrrr6FO.,+j, rrvG, /` SiIFLBue/r-, ✓r oBatlZ, DAr-D PE B.r9m,r1 \I �. Pp •G�. 1)WArMSGe TO .,AU 5'cpvEe ��. 7 V/cc M,I. //////' 1 e2 Sin "r-9 ;).1LL fJ[/S�N/p err/L/ry LOCq t'/o/vS r1Pl RPPQLK/MqT< �y �e ~SP 3\(0. ¢ram ./-ram La.O cp/y re AGTOe ro <crvrACT Oro SAP- 46 --S. Pe 1-&7 CDMMC/vCGME/v r o< CANST¢ycT/pN. , 3'.1`_W -3i1 Gvva 4jCY/STUYC3 TOPLYa2RPNy P¢prvl FIELD SueVFY By WEBSTFe-MAer/N, r/yC„ SOUTH BLIZL/MB]1ONr Ur• -'QFGOQr .aQ � ANC. �C6 QUSSELL SUPPLY PaOPO3E0 UN/A?h K<r5t ?STIIrCe✓rrtNy FAG/L I' SIT- PLAN I Lp,�" 3 GQ'-fO Or e'S DUT¢/AL PAZAeL 6et60e4 velle SGUrr1 3uCLrr-.6]Cr/, Vr WMND y+,n f/itE m r WEBSTER-MARTIN. INC Sz= y� CONSULTING BdC+ulEskS ,. samr �uwN:rpa ruwrt per. B. Le8 yH.urtm, auac . 71-118y reF powaa I . ncaF./a.+ awsa.ne•.rr ion.rwa p2TLKf iG fin.,.. (�..Mtiri/a.Aa.•�w�.le.., . ._1 1 GeFfM TYte HLe, i. C. [W/i) I ..e.roNT F�oLee ScrcatL�sis, swc. (iva2wp) rrzr+ul meet pteG ,xNc, pp Sc<as/ro c e. 1 OVMJTarat n+o S lr¢wn. as..a i I O EM c Su es cuwroen w. eE�:ceY 3uGTN T <dr..LOCY pc I P. BURY �Z F COCAT/ON MAP I Ge6a NO MPM CLVOLOP1y JT C'O. •^4 —1.4— r raowsao < o✓a —ssr— �apaOro3a -•y Nq wA o ; w n ¢ w— aaltr•ny �e wfa _ _ _ _ :mpo.,.o s.oa•a t•wa Ary pla/exD GATC.Y OAi.N tl.ny SAn.rKrt!•wi----5---- /0�roaa0fAnlrA¢,ra!✓•aa —3— � � E..a rir.4 MAr.nsac Q (¢oroxO MAn••Oaa � .aov pN /L.<J — S.Oa wao ,i• F¢oroseo sror asLAa s. c.+ Ea CT� - . osao m-/cuncDSO . raa arwr o.� aww wa F.¢t r•/D¢Arvl A auc o.•+y L�o.+r ee.aw¢D G�a.+r HUBS/. • GwUyNrcas /I.DU3 r</K M<.G, SOurr1 <U¢.L /NGTp.Y,VT� av .cl+esl r_ ns•n0 cor+s.x.T.n.aa .ln�,....:., Sric�tluL/�c, VT Jr (., D/I (EO F!tl-�9G0, <LLL 'J-20-GY. /L 2JWATL3 3<¢µGc l0 NRW 5' coVL¢ M.N. CO ® �!M <M. .Yt.9 l/AUL ti.a rirVp ✓TKIf✓ GOGA rInns A<t RIPLO<rrnATi . ..µ •as 9..a sa .Jn rawsfDa N on TAGT O. SA�a GommancaMlNrw co.•ir<u: r,cr-r. �a ras. Pa.otro n)i r�s r/nq +cAa6arwrY F<pr( r,c a_o a✓awV <✓ •'y GaMC. G4fa .ea< p wGOs raa-mw<T.N, urc., so✓rr y..¢s.no Tow, �T. ae.aw Fapasasao cone. e✓<O m nP.1� �aG na 4fi. aV33G�L 3✓PP�✓ COLD. I<OPoatD w+L<rc..si W+rizrJurroN iAL KIry SrTt PLAN LOT '• p aaesEoaV nno a+a.ee.mca's ,noucr<.A� PA¢6 seaaoav oa.ve i0✓TM <uLG.n4rON, VT ""nTM°wn u.w. rm WEBSTER-MARTIN. INC. r'sio• * CONSULTING ENGINEERS �pyt q J souM w.�wiow x.won Gs..e9or CLO CONTRACT Na PLANNING COMMISSION 30 MAY 1989 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 30 May 1989, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Peter Jacob, Chairman; William Burgess, John Belter, Mary - Barbara Maher, Ann Pugh Also Present Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Gary Farrell, Terry Boyle, Dan O'Brien, Sonny Audette, Alec Tuscany 1. Other Business a) Members questioned the authority to issue number of pumps. Mr. whether the Zoning a permit to allow Weith will check on Administrator had an increase in the this. 2. Continue Site Plan application of Russell Supply Corp. for construction of a 10,333 sq. ft. building for wholesale supply and distribution use, lot 3, Gregory & Daughters In- dustrial Park, Gregory Drive Mr. Tuscany said the question of the road has now been settled with the city. The applicant has widened the access from 21 ft. to 24 ft. The Fire Chief had asked for 30 ft., but the Commission said they would accept 24 ft. White pine trees have been changed to Austrian Pine. The tamarack has been eliminated. The new plantings don't conflict with utilities. Mr. Weith said there are no remaining issues. Mr. Jacob told the applicant the Commission would like them to come back if any changes are made at Act 250. Ms. Pugh moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Russell Supply Corporation for construction of a 10,333 sq. ft. building for wholesale supply and distribu- tion use as depicted on a plan titled "W.G. Russell Supply Corporation, Proposed Warehouse Distribution Facility, Site Plan" prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc, and dated 3/31/89, last revised 5/3/89 and 5/5/89 (landscape page) with the fol- lowing stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $4800, 3-year landscaping bond prior to permit. 2. The applicant shall contribute $237 to the Williston Road Traffic Improvement Fund (Impact Area 2) based on the 24 peak hour trips to be generated. This fee shall be paid prior to permit. PLANNING COMMISSION 30 MAY 1989 PAGE 2 3. A sewer allocation of 150 gpd is granted. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. 4. This approval is based upon the expressed representation of the applicant that no trailers will be used for storage. 5. The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Burgess seconded. Motion passed unanimousl 3. Review Final Plat application of Gary Farrell to revise the parking layout, circulation and landscaping at the Sheraton -Burlington Inn, Williston Road Mr. Boyle said these are minor site revisions due to the dis- covery of ledge on the site. The revisions will allow drain- age to be handled easier now, using a dry detention basin. There is also a new proposed right-of-way with UVM. Arriving guests will not have to cross the roadway to get to the main entrance. They can walk through aisles. There is a special loop for buses. Also a UVM access to the land they own. The landscape changes involve a row of trees planted along the entryway and islands of willows on the parking lot. There is fire vehicle access between and around buildings that has been worked out with the Chief. Pine trees have been added along I-89 and near the detention basin area. The land- scaping is of greater value than the original plan. There will also be plantings in the interior courtyard. Mr. Weith noted that Cathy Debo of CCTA has questions about their pro- posed bus routes. Mr. Farrell said they are not sure what is to happen with the Texaco Station property. Mr. Burgess moved the Commission approve the revised Final Plat application of Gary Farrell to revise the parking layout circulation and landscaping at the Sheraton Burlington Inn as depicted on a 2-page set of plans entitled "Sheraton Inn and Conference Center" prepared j?y T.J. Boyle & Associates and dated 12/20/88, last revised 5-23-89. All stipulations of the approval of 1/5/88 remain in effect. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Site plan application of William & Lee Bissonette for ex- pansion of the parking lot (13 additional spaces) at A1's French Fries, Williston Road Mr. Bill Bissonette said they have turned the parking east - west instead of north -south. The will still continue the curb and sidewalk along fvr 250 ft. There will be plantings 1000, t7� M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: May 30, 1989 Agenda Items Date: May 26, 1989 2) RUSSELL SUPPLY, LOT 3_ GREGORY & DAUGHTERS ora ion proposes to construct a 10,333 square foot, one-story building for warehouse and distribution use. This application was first reviewed on 4/11/89 and tabled pending the dedication of Gregory Drive to the City. The minutes from +l, !. /11 /Q0 +„- — l a !'r— —, TIr;i: haS since been CAL -Le Y/ 11/ U l {l{GG 1. _A.r, --- --------. V1 VgVL Y L11 v V officially dedicated to the City. The lot is located in the I-C (Mixed -Industrial_) zone. The property is bounded on the west by Vermont Boiler Specialists and another vacant lot in Green Tree Park, on the north by RPM Development Company (Marque's Bros.) and on the east by Gregory Drive. Access: Single access is shown via a 28' wide drive from Gregory Drive, in the northeast part of the lot. Circulation: Circulation continues from the entrance drive southwesterly towards the rear of the proposed building. Circu- lation aisle widths have been increased to 24' wide as requested by the Planning Commission. Setbacks/Coverage: All setbacks and coverage requirements are met. Parking: 24 parking spaces are required and 24 are shown. Landscaping: The site requires $4800 in new landscaping value. The plan proposes Austria pine, juniper, dogwood, crabapple, and burning bush. The plan meets the required value. The plan was revised since the first meeting to show Austrian Pine along Gregory Drive instead of White Pine. Also, Tamarack was omitted. TRAFFIC: The applicant shall pay $237 to the Williston Road Traffic Impact Area 2 program based on the 24 peak hour trips to be generated. Sewer: A sewer allocation of 150 gpd is granted. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 per gallon fee. 1 - 344 ITY COMMON NAME PLANTING SCHEDULE BOTANIC NAME SIZE NOTE 8 AUSTRIAN PINE Pinus nigra 6' - 7' BALL&BURLAP 9 SARGENT Malus sargenti 1 3/411- 2" BALL&BURLAP # BAPPLE 9 PFITZER Juniperus pfitzeriana 24" - 30" CONTAINER JUNIPER .a 34 RED STEM Cornus alba siberica 3' - 4' BALL&BURLAP DOGWOOD 32 DWARF RED Cornus kelseyi 12" - 18" CONTAINER STEM DOGWOOD 18 COMPACT Euonymus alatus 24" - 30" BALL&BURLAP W VMING BUSH compacta 30 ANDORRA Juniperus 12" - 15" CONTAINER. JUNIPER horizontalis andorra Aw,w- Nwu-fi;e-s NOTE$ t 1-VERIFY LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO DIGGING HOLES FOR PLANT MATERIAL. 2-SITE DISTANCE RESTRICTION MUST BE KEPT CLEAR OF PLANT MATERIAL TALLER THAN 24". THE DWARF REDSTEM DOGWOOD (Cornus kelseyi) HAS A MATURE HEIGHT OF 18" - 24". 3-SITE PLAN LAYOUT, GRADING PLAN, LIGHTING PLAN, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN BY WEBSTER-MARTIN, INCORPORATED. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 May 26, 1989 Mr. Jack Myers Webster -Martin 1025 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Russell Supply Dear Mr. Myers: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, May 30, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, ;oe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp WEBSTER-MARTIN, INC. P. 0. Box 2246 SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05401-2246 LETTER W"MUSETTUL Rr For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US �� Z: T.�T 14zQ91 TTc !`IJ% sn.ATlo� 4 (802) 864-0223 TO C(Tq cg--- WE ARE SENDING YOU X Attached ❑ Under separate cover via DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION V� WC li1-� RE: StTc- Fx�►J ❑ Shop drawings 9 Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION S -7 W.G � 720ssEe-e- c or ? P12o�4sEo �,r�rzC � " 41 � �C-� �.1D 2.7oIc�G[A'T8Z S 1 t�D �� rcLL.. rL Qan!> x6�- THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: REMARKS COPY PRODUCT 140-3 � Inc., GMW, M= 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. lei x tj4+0 PURPOSE —� In general, a long range master plan for a campus is a document that takes a series of programmatic assumptions and premises at a point in time and translates these into a forecast of how the campus might look and function at various timespans in the future. This type of plan is not a static plan and it should be recognized that as changes occur in the assumptions, premises, or program directions then the plan must also change to reflect these. It is perhaps easier to understand in terms of what a master plan is not designed to do. It is not a document to be used to specifically site, size, or determine who and what will occupy new or expanded facilities; these functions will be carried out as part of the detailed planning and program definition as a project comes closer to reality. It is not a plan to address the very specific utilization of a facility, eg. a facility for the language arts; it will address very generic functions, ie. residential, academic/administrative, research, and support activities, rather than identifying specific functions or departments. The plan will not address the operational details of a proposed facility or function, eg. how or whether electricity generated by a cogeneration facility will be sold to a utility. In summary, a master plan is designed to provide a skeletal framework for future growth and change which will be filled in when the appropriate time arrives. This Campus Master Plan, as with all long range plans, must be flexible and reviewed on a regular basis to examine underlying assumptions and any other changes which would affect the plan. It is recommended that a formal review take place on a biennial basis for this specific Master Plan. SCOPE 3. The Campus Master Plan is designed to address the main campus area, including the core campus, south campus, and the centennial woods area. The agricultural properties to the south of the main campus in the City of South Burlington are not a part of this version of the Plan and are assumed to remain as agricultural use for the long range. The next review of the fic areas which will allow the new leadership in the College of Plan will address these speci Agriculture and Life Sciences time to formulate specific plans and examine alternatives. Fort Ethan Allen is also not included in the Master Plan. It should be noted however that the Board of Trustees have endorsed a goal of disposing of property not fully utilized at the Fort, the industrial section, and potentially the old and new married student housing if equivalent housing is created closer to campus. Since no decisions have been reached regarding the occupied housing no assumptions have been made regarding replacement housing nearer the main campus. - The University has 24 buildings listed on the National Register of Historic sites and > addi- tional facilities located in state and locally designated historic districts. Many of these facilities are located on the "green" or on Redstone Campus. 2-1 � ,�.�6r) v L14 3 FA 2 ` ApggympsMC21sulwingPOLOA1t29 501 A�� (1) Maximum Traffic Generation Maximum Permitted Peak Hour Level Pe r Zone = MAW Wl1q%9 &E tht Zbne.. Average Peak Hour Trip Generation Rate (2) Total Permitted Size = Maximum Traffic Ty, Generation Level EXAMPLE: What is the maximum permitted gross floor area (GFA) for a [general] 19di191 office building on a 100,000 square foot lot in Zone 2? 20 WMitM T[W (1) Maximum Traffic [2.32] Peak Hour Trips Per 1,000< = (Source: ITE TRIP GENERATION) = [8,621gfa]; 5,57GFA to 5`900gfa (see tab;e) (2) Total Permitted Size = [8,600gfa] x 100.000 50900A 40,000 = [21.500gfa] 14A50 UYA 4 0- 3 J /3 V� ?30 sy 3 0, �r / 0, )( Z. Sr -?, 2 5'- - 19 3/21/89 PROP0:1E1.) AMENDMENT", TO SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING REGULATIONS - ARTICLE XVII, TRAFFIC OVERLAY DISTRICT AND TABLE III, TRAFFIC GENERATION DATA AND CALCULATION PRE CEDURUS The following i.znderlined text is proposed to be added. The text in brackets is proposed to be deleted. ARTICLE XVII: 17.206 [other locations and types of access are not restricted] Zone 6 shall consist of all lots contained in Central District 1, Central District 2 and Central District 3 of the City Center Zoning District. 17.207 Other locations and types of access are not re- stricted. 17.301 Traffic volumes estimates shall be based on TRIP GENERATION, [THIRD] FOURTH EDITION - [1982) 1987, Institute of Traffic Engineers, or its equivalent. The Planning Commission may approve estimates from other sources, including traffic counts, if the above source does not contain data for a specified use or if a use contains unique characteristics that cause it to differ from national traffic estimates. 17.303 The maximum permitted peak hour volume [per minimum lot] Per 40.000 square feet of land size in any zone is as follows: Zone 1-15 trips, Zone 2-20 trips, Zone 3-25 trips, Zone 4-30 trips, [and] Zone 5-45 trips, and Zone 6-45 trips. Table III: 1. Maximum size of use per Traffic Overlay Zone. The information Provided in the table below is meant as a wide. Specific data contained in the ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, FOURTH EDITION shall apply for calculations of Permitted size. All sizes are based on [ITE's TRIP GENERATION, July, 1984 revised edition] Trip Generation Rates for the Peak Hour of Generator. [Most sizes) Sizes are expressed in terms of gross square footage of floor area (GFA) or gross square ota e of leasable area (GLA) . The rates are subject to change, and any subsequently issued ITE trip generation rates shall be applicable in place of those listed below. 1 yx� voo C9 on East Avenue. These changes will complete the planning cycle providing delin- eated campus vehicular and pedestrian movement via an internal roadway system. • Pedestrian Circulation Improvements in this time frame will consist of walkway construction and expan- sion throughout the Centennial Field development area. • Bicycle Circulation The bicycle path network will expand to link the Centennial Field development area to the core campus and city facilities. NATURAL AREAS Again, no new natural areas are forecast to be added during this timeframe. The importance of preserving the valuable portions of Centennial Woods now becomes even clearer with the addition of new facilities and circulation around this "parkland" to create an attractive, aesthetically pleasing environment. In addition the razing of Perkins Geology provides and opportunity for the potential of expansion of the business and engineering programs and the addition of open, landscaped space on the north border of the core campus. During this period two new facilities are planned for the area between Fleming Museum and the Library. This will allow for the creation of two better sized and shaped open areas or "quads" rather than the long and narrow area existing today. 23 PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 8. 1980 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, April 8, 1980 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 1175 Williston Road Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; George Mona, Peter Jacob, Robert Walsh, Kirk Woolery, James Ewing Member Absent Ernest Levesque Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Robert Krebs, Meg Lukens, Dave Nicholson, C.W. Gregory Minutes of April 1. 1980 Mr. Mona noted that at the last meeting, he had wanted the words "and noted on the plan of record" add 'e&`�to the second stipulation of the University Mall approval. Although the ,same phrase was not at that time added also to the first stipulation, Mr. Mona felt it had been the intent of the Commission that the phrase apply,,.also to the City Planner in stipulation 1. The Commission agreed - that that had been their intent, and the words "and noted on the plan of record" should be added after "City Planner" in stipulation 1 on page 2. Mr.,-Woolery moved to approve the April 1. 1980 minutes as amended, Mr. Jacob. seconded, and all voted aye. Final plat application of Gregory and Daughters for a 6-lot industrial subdivision on a new street to be called Gregory Drive off Williston Road Mr. Robert Krebs said the plan was relatively unchanged from the last meeting. City Manager Szymanski's requests have been incorporated into the plan. Water and sewer will be provided for all 6 lots and a new right turn lane will be added on Williston Road. The state has reviewed the plan, as has Traffic Engineering Associates (see attached copy of that report). The maximum amount of traffic anticipated at this intersection is 9% of its total capacity, Mr. Krebs told the commission. A sign prohibiting left turns out of the development will be posted. Mr. Mona felt that would be totally unenforceable. It was noted that a large truck could go straight into the street opposite this development in case of an emergency (a car coming over the hill while the truck blocked several lanes). It was felt that No Left Turn signs would be ignored. The possibility of a traffic light at the intersection was discussed. Mr. Krebs stated that if a truck did try to go left up the hill and another car came down the hill, that car could go into the new right turn lane to avoid the truck. It was noted that more vehicles would go toward Burlington than Williston. It was suggested that, at a later time, if there appeared to be a problem here, a light could be studied. Noting that it might be dangerous to have a light on this hill, the commission suggested cutting down the hill, or putting the light at the top of the hill and having it tripped by exiting trucks. Mr. Krebs noted that there would be a flashing light 750' before the intersection, and Mr. Gregory added that someday there would be a road for trucks to exit from the development to the rear to Shunpike Road, Kimball Avenue, and then to Kennedy Drive. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 8, 1980 The commission liked that idea. Mr. Poger found Traffic Engineering Associates' report confusing. It stated there might be 125 vehicles for this development at the peak hour, and Mr. Poger felt that was a very high figure. He also wanted to know what the Associates would say about the intersection given the possibility that cars would come over the hill, not at the posted 40 mph speed, but at 45 or 50mph. He wanted to know how fast a car could come over the hill and still have good sight -distance. Mr. Poger suggested reviewing traffic again after a few of these lots had been developed. Mr. Gregory said Green Mountain Power had given permission to move its poles if he needs more room to build on lot 4. Mr. David Nicholson represented Mrs. DeLeclair, the neighbor to the east of the property. She is concerned about drainage. It was noted that there would be catch basins for water, as well as a ditch from the turnaround to the brook and a natural ditch along the property line of the two lots. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of Gregory and Daughters for a 6 lot industrial subdivision on a new street called Gregory Drive off Williston Road as depicted on a plan and attached drawings entitled "Final Plan, Gregory and Daughters, Industrial Park,"prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers and dated February 1980, subject to the following stipulations: 1 1. Driveway entrances to lots 3 and 4 shall be located so as to be compatible with the future right of way to the RDR property. Front -yard setbacks shall also conform to the proposed right of way. 2. Lot 3, which may be bisected by a future road, is approved as one building lot only. 3. Upon development of the RDR property to the west, the Planning Commission shall review the need for a street connection to be provided by the subsequent developer to the Gregory Drive cul-de-sac. 4. The following revisions in construction and -site details shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer and shall be incorporated into the final map submission: (a) Addition of a curb cut and pull -off area adjacent to the pumping station large enough to accomodate a service truck. (b) Water service to the pumping station. (c) Catch basin grates of type Neenah R3405-R or equivalent. 5. If any portion of the subdivision is served by three-phase power..that type of power shall also be provided to the pumping station. 6. The existing fire hydrant at Williston Road shall be relocated as approved by the Fire Chief and the new location shall be indicated on the final map submision. 7. Sewer capacity for the industrial park has been estimated at 1500 to 2000 gallons per day for the purpose of sizing the pumping station. Each lot's allocation of the Airport treatment plant capacity shall be made at the time of site plan review. 3. PLANNING C014MISSION APRIL 8. 1980 8. Bonding for all public improvements shall be arranged prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the subdivision. The statement "_easements and roads to be dedicated as re uired" on page 1 of 4 shall be deleted. 9. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days. 10. The City Planner shall review the traffic resulting from this industrial park after the development of 4 lots and report his findings to the Planning_ Commission. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion. The Commission requested that the stop line for exiting traffic from the development be moved closer to the road so exiting cars could see if traffic was coming down the hill. "It was noted that, if the Commission did not find the traffic conditions acceptable after 4 lots are developed, at the site -plan reviews of lots 5 and 6 approval could be withheld until the conditions are brought up to par. That may involve some expense to the city or Mr. Gregory. The motion carried without dissent. Continuation of public hearing on application by the Glenwood Corporation Mery Brown for Revised Final Plat approval for cluster J 20 units of phase 2 of the Stonehedge development Mr. Spitz`, said the applicant had requested that this item be postponed. Since neither the applicant, nor the neighbors, who had been told that there would be a postponement of the hearing, were present, Mr. Spitz did not feel the Commission should have a lengthy discussion of the item. He told the board that the two questions raised at previous meetings had been answered by the City Attorney, in his 2/7 memo. The Commission noted that the letter stated that the entire PUD should be,,reviewed anew if the alterations would have a significant adverse effect on the character of the PUD, and if the Commission could articulate the ways in which it would do this. Discussion centered on the meaning of the word "character" in this case. The residents of the area feel that the alteration would profoundly affect the character of the area. Mr. Mona felt the concern of the residents was for what the new units would do to those already there. Mr. Walsh felt that the Commission should review the plan with a view to conserving the value of the existing buildings, because he felt that was the intent of the statutes (Vermont Planning and Development Act). Mr. Jacob felt that if the residents had complaints, their recourse was to the courts, particularly if what had been represented to them was being violated. The Commission discussed whether the proposed change was drastic or not. Mr. Woolery had some concerns about allowing units in phase 2 to be constructed before phase 1 was completed. The Commission, if it approved the,'change for phase 2, did not want to have units in phase 1 altered. Mr. Mona did not want to approve any change unless he had a clear picture of what would happen to the units other than in cluster J, in both phase 1 and 2. Mr. Spitz felt this discussion should continue when the applicant and neighbors were present, but Mr. Mona felt that no decision would be made tonight and Messrs. Jacob and,Ewing felt this discussion was to help them straighten things out in their own minds. Mr% Woolery moved to continue the public hearing for the application b the G7/envood Corporation for revised final plat aDDroval for cluster J 20 units) of phase 2 of the Stonehedge development until April 15 at 7: City Hall. Mir. Mona seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. WEBSTER-MARTIN, INC. P. 0. Box 2246 SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05401-2246 L- LF U T E M3 Oo F UMU `J LJ O T" URL (802) 864-0223 TO 5 7 S WE ARE SENDING YOU W, Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings rl Copy of letter DATE 3 3 e JOB NO, C6 -8c'Q E� ATTENTION RE: _vc�F�• �vPf��Y the following items: 4 Prints 9 Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications CJ Change order ( e'�PI�GICeFT/O�! ¢ FEE COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION J� 3/ /'--6 SATE G rt/ S ��,VEGc56G 6�,0�1r�c�TCoS�o�t/cc�vfleaL r / 318 l 3 3 "� Pam/ G_ THESE .ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested 19 For review and comment ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ — Resubmit copies for approval X Submit copies for distribution [1 Return— —corrected prints ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 _ ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS #po __. - `/ 71 106-4t)A.21tiIf COPY TO PRODUCT 2403 � Inc., OMm, Ws 01471. SIGNED: 1//" 9,— If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify u L once.