Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0025 0027 Green Mountain DriveREMOVE EXI _. LIGHT POLE AND d I % + I••' I I MR FIXTURES (2) AND REPLACE / �. f� S[- ) 1 / I WITHPOLE AND NEW LED MTURE- / TYPICAL NEW POLE AMOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 0,09 007 0.08 01 22 0.332 o 0 045 a 0.37 030 023 W9 018 V3 a10 039 11: 1.09 i + 0h3 061 0,G4 61 050 o0 0. 42 068 07 9.60 37 039 0.43 � 76F 08 - + .1'a 0. , 7 068 O57 0y 057 L67 259 °.R 7 ]14-s! IN 07 032 079 367 060 5 057 + .:2 12T 164) F61 -- 10 U2 079 0.61 0. 050 y- 1+66 130 1' : 1?.iE61'9 ]97 067 06 '4 I 3 Jf:11-133 ti 24 I l8b 071 0+59 0 oT } .io 113 4 036 063 '0 0� _+gip' 116 rig .07 1,+ ill 0 aa1 063 0 D ,.440 11b 312 I IT it 1�10 I. 101 P 0.68 046 0 0 00 V " + s t d f + } i }83'7r09 .UF 1.24 - 10 1.06 1. 081 056 025 ll,\174 17, 114 1 0,77 068 0 0 0.33 ++� � fo .5I 116, L - 0,86 �84 OG5 T-0, 13S '+ u t + 24- 1��1 123 ),04 .8s 71 0.53 o L 02 - E' r + ti ,34 133 13 -,I+ 1 1.'9� 4 086 q,17 J.56 0. 4 0�J J J! 142 k407 16e o79 076 9ma r f 1 la4 r�s_ 1.2 as 10� o3z 0'- 9 as 33_t 7 t18 .116 70 06C o+ t65 1UH 0.e2 9fv 5 `.. > 074 2 PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY BUILDING If / Of is n` 7 - �- ti\ CUTDFFLIGHTONTRASHITLECYCLING STORAGE BUILDING TO BE MOTION SENSOR ACINATED(LIGHT LEVELS NOT SHO") ,, L.I an .,N MaWe.tl ue prae .Huai n - (B 10) S.du OPliun Cuererd p ACE 1. 111 ad' OA' nM p Ora HV A5D tell a1CeK e.plur imilperalurP NIL IBe 5M' BE 13. O pUl 1]N �a60 IaaP IdOUDnim01 .a LEGEND DESCRIPTION LAMP TYPE DISTRIBUTION TYPE MOUNTING HEIGHT 1 7 BNB' BW ea 88Ki nfionA ® 0'N pGOB' t. al '.e 360m0. 001N 81W p' E3 BETA EDGE LED AREA LIGHT 60 LED, 4300K COLOR TEMP. TYPEIII-CUTOFF 17 FEET POLE MOUNTED ON ry �Btid �515mA ((�7 NL HM1 1 ✓J.1h26. lleeat opal" ®YB 0 Mee, O6fm 6, Bual stein lnWOn ES M BETA EDGE LED AREA LIGHT 100 LED, 43DOK COLOR TEMP. TYPE V-CUTOFF N FEET POLE MOUNTED p f0 LQduercai p Bp O ISO° pB P PPebcel r-° O12 DIE G)OA^A � xP ©ta 0a)4BW Bipn[e 10(m.4 13 a1 NumAieve�poel geppledf+"+ pta M1V40UV urare IoemA p KL nnuH coal l]Ve¢6y' vw BETA EDGE LED AREA LIGHT 60 LED, 43DOK COLOR TEMP. TYPEIII- CUTOFF 11 FEET BUILDING MOUNTED 1L M Pe 13 �T�/6P51" 1314 01a pPB ' © t6 -]4N - On 16W pllllnum 13 BB p>a Baonie pax 13 �M 14We wnur par wnne sou �ary vampmaa eannmaa E iry IN a Na... nrro a' axrpr,..xx B.am wapw p m°wwre<. ,.em a. lae w ma nn a 1 'b a x�.w e. °BIWwu°°e ..... + 1a min,a+,.r ���»"e�+rw'r,,. Yw madne.eaav,.l w _ p x, a• m �e morn i-�-' t6� � 'u4 .a tod a+rn-r+. +rr +, .x..r.a, m,nnrm.NeR n wHa.m,eKnn w,rpn ro taPnopne wnl., nrnp ina�iaonim 6We�drnex umNM1ay6+tlfD.r r� ir. aNnlxroM1cer v,n.nre 6. pnen 5r od,m Ike 0LorW LLD PLKOHMANC6 SIECS ®�.klnk©1�m.�o�k®��a���■a/:v`1���:j��p_1�]]��k 1 rlLlipf.•l6� 1 pkp18�/87 MBJkI ��$��SpM�d��OlNka� fp6:pktL. PakIF,l4PliieifL"1 �1�E.f�dJ mmo�tPp.OsION", �"�. ®� n8Bka8wpp80S1 ORION", k®6 ®5����66aa{pP1a'' OFlf'a flp Rkal kp1W aii iFI �-�1<RI�6�iVYa-1T aVa 4Wi®1 dam�a.neael W� �iltrt0a®nBIBa iR3. W&WBp in iPY�1at ��RY�fIFi�tf�FFl _.. finTO1 a,o, .m., an..r.naeer,aL2,p mnm4onn r.,a.rap+�nm� .R,K.aew,eM.,_„, A,..,t�a6,B.ap..aam.,dmoe, NOY Ae U reseW,1 ,ry D 11 ouFrtoLce, a (y P. 20H BetaLED°. a dIN51B0 dRuud LI/Wo0 120612 d8trae1 Sturimet. WS31V • 801-236-6506 •-botaLED.BoN I{J Mate -ir The U,SA of US " F0:1ag YXM. M r,.s Boy Amerttan eq ,emenfs wahle tDe AHFA �^� 4eeeLf9 PEBFCRYANCE 9FEC3 s�Raa nn�c�no �nnLrtn�woYk �i�i�i� f+�il.'^IAItt`.11•[N1�NApp ��;y ���Epp4'Maf001•Flaafl t:Vatrl,T.1•�kli �®f4'Bir}ll1 66aPr1� ssm mi�^1a ENES R Npp+WISS n1"HR Ill 8® R� �alr.YXa6a1.81B761 �l?S-YAP.11♦ LiN67 i2t�iN)•iRt�t+F:�fiftSa� if48f LBf sb_IaTa:I�BIWal �bL1R'I�F19fa E.1•t4a�tli[��1KY3�tFl�iBk[d+l• NOiF AU Ea1a5gDJea to ¢hang¢ without got'ce. '} m 2011 BMBLED°',ad1VINOD of quutl Lip011np 1200 B2M BI . 8twNv I WI e]ip1 800-iJ0-BB00 ww.keia LfO.apm .41, MP8 I USA. tUb P,t'UaOlfs M is Bw Am.rhanmg 'rmrPlts vritnrl•fhe ARRA EE, RECEIVED NOV 13 2014 City of So. Burlington GRAPHIC SCALE 60 0 25 w 100 200 (m reap 1 BCN•60fl. LOCATION PLAN N.T.S. ROBERT BERM AN, LEG NIF VOL 912 PG 225 THE HERITAGE I AUTOMOTIV GROUP, INC. VOL ]]6 PG 284 gy EXISTING BUILDING A— CI — .1 B. TO US RTE T GREEN MOUNTAIN OR. NB3°44.13'w 32'06�� —' V)SI'CMF ',A.G G I 1 1 PW� I 1Yx38' EASEMENTTOGREFN MDT PARTNERSHIP, ELF a MOUNTAIN POWER NIF VOL 168 RG 168 QI CORPORATION AS RECORDED VOL 490 PG 894 9� I IV WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT TO GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION AS RECORDED IN VOL IN PG 518 I PROPOSED 217 WIDE UTILRY EASEMENT TO CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON OT 2 EXISTING AREA - 9,55 ACRES PROPOSED AREA • 9.96 ACRE tx EXISTING BUILDING KART V RIECHELT WF VOL 1B] PG 383 VOL 16] PG 386 3V WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT TO THE Cltt OF SOUTH BURLINGTON AS RECORDED IN VOL 180 PG 4W 1702A720 SHEL ROAD CONDOM NIF VOL 787 PG GRAPHIC SCALE 1LE 0 50 100 200 400 (In feop t .1, - 100 R. 15' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON AS RECORDED IN VOL 211 PG 247 1 I �-, 113030' UNNERSITY OF VERMONT WF VOL 30 PG 286 LOT 1 EXISTING AREA - 3.70 ACRES IROPOSED AREA= 3.29 ACRES EXISTINGI - IPROPERTYLINE NQy, / PROPOSED TO BE DISSOLVED _ / PROPERTY LINE 11.5f MPS 515°25"", LEGEND: — EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE — ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE SIDELINE OF EXISTING EASEMENT — SIDELINE OF PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK NIF NOWORFORMERLY IRE IRON ROD FOUND ■ CMF CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND $ MPS IRON PIPE SET u IRS IRON ROD SET SURVEY POINT (NO MARKER FOUND OR SET) 4 X4' CMF B.G. BELOW GRADE 5 AG A.G. ABOVE GRADE 89,e3' 542°26'36"W NOTES: 10' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT TO THE CRY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON AS RECORDED IN VOL 199 PG 144 CRY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON WF VOL 126 PG 292 1. THIS PLAT WAS COMPILED FROM FIELD SURVEYS AND RECORD RESEARCH INCLUDING THE USE OF THE FOLLOWING PLATS: A. 'ALTAUACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY, IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION dW1 GE HEALTHCARE, 25 & 27 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR. SOUTH BURLNGTON, VT.' BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS DATED MARCH A()IL LAST REVISED NOV. 15, 2010, AS RECORDED IN SLIDE k549 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. B.'GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION, CORPORATE HEALDUARTERS BUILDING. SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT.'BY SARGENT, WEBSTER, CRENSHAW AND FOLLEY, DATED MARCH M. 1SN, LAST REVISED JULY 10. 1964 AS RECORDED IN SLIDE 4/88 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. C. TNATIO AL LIFE INSURANCE CO., SHELBURNE ROAD, SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT' BY WEBSTER-MARTIN, INC. DATED JONE,1973 AS RECORDED IN SLIDE 0101 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. 2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON SURVEY GRADE GPS OBSERVATIONS AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. SEPTEMBER. 2014. 3. THIS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO OTHER EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY. 4. ALL IRON PIPES SET ARE 1' INSIDE DIAMETER AND ALL MONUMENTATION FOUND IS AS NOTED. 5. A SURVEY WAS COMPLETED IN SEPTEMBER, 2014, USING A COMBINATION OF GPS BASELINES AND CONVENTIONAL SURVEY EQUIPMENT. THE METHODS AND THE RESULTING ERROR MEET OR EXCEED THE MINIMUM PRECISION REQUIREMENTS FOR URBAN SURVEYS. ' CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT, .M14 RECEIVED FOR RECORD AT O'CLOCK _ M., AND RECORDED IN SLIDE4 ^ u APPROVEVIE D 8V RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ATTEST: CITY CLERK BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. d- descd VERMONT, ON THE_ DAY OF 2014 VIISS�IOOIIJJ6S SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID OWNER THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD91 ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURP SE SHOWN BELOW: SHE SB�A6 RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF 2DM BAR RY MOSSMAN,TRUSTEE OF THE 0 KET H/ MEP BY STONEHENGE INVESTMENT PRELIMINARY M FINAL CORPORATION, INC.. MONEY RECORD DRAWING PURCHASE PENSION PUN AND TRUST LANDSOF prOj. 1 LAWSON LANE' BURUNGTON, VTOM82 BARRY MOSSMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE 1401 (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) VOL976, PG. 225 STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, s.N INC., MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN JKR AND TRUST desl 25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR., SOUTH BURLINGTON VT ABF TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS PLAT IS BASED ON BOUNDARY LINE tlTav L&D INFORMATION ABSTRACTED FROM PERTINENT DEEDS AND/OR OTHER OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND MARKERS EVIDENT chet ONTHE PROPERTY.ANDCONFORMSWRH THE ADJUSTMENT PLAT REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA § 1403. DATED delB THIS DAV OF ,2014 0/0 LAMOUREI:X & DICIONSON lonsulliny Eo6iueera, lne. RECEIVED NOV 13 2014 City of So. Burlington No Text STORAGE I I. i ---------- ---------- I ---------- 2 3 1 5 l I BIKE 4/ I 43 62 41 90 59 SB I St 56 55 STORAGE 4 1 I I I 1 h S/) M C / , 0 M� �J O M a Q MECHJ SPRINKLER II 1 12 1 13 L. PARKING GARAGE am I Ig "T I �I II 20 0 I 11 "-- ELEV --- I I w... 1 6--- i VE9T.�'I ELECT. • �`� ® ; j I ® 21 E. MACH. 22 0 —.—. _ _- - 2 3 _ 0 21 53 25 52 26 51 I, it II 11 it it � I 21 1I I� II 50 28 99 29 I I 98 it 30 11 41 31 46 32 95 I II i I 33 I 99 I II I 34 I I 13 35 92 3i L A: I I STAIR I II ® I I Il I II II 3t 91 i i 3B I 90 39 11 EXHAUST FAN WELL IV N m w me PARKING LAYOUT Snyder Homes L_L_Great neighhorhoo ' towmehometo 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelbnt 05482 802.985.5722 - f 802.497.0701 p 02.98 .5722-f 02.497.0 www.SnvderHomesVT.com DATE REVISION GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT P-0' X a, - OPENING F VENTILATII WEST ELEV. Ler - r-a• -01• 3048 DOOR POSITIVE LATCHING AND ODOR CLOSURE LIGHTS ON MOTION 9 SON R 1 t t t I ----------- — — — — — — — — — — I 1 i I I 1 ��...� I t p I i i t I 1 1 1 1 f 1 I 1 1 I 1 I i I 1 I I I I i LIGHTS MOTION SE SO 9090 OVERHEAD DOOR 3048 DEOATCHNG 9090 OVERHEAD DOOR POSITAND DOOR CLOSURE h1 FLOOR PLAN 1/r - r-o- DECORATIVE LOUVER ASPHALT („ $HMGLE5 \\\ 0 D 19 97 IXL CORNICE 1TYP.1 - 0(1 FASCIA ITYP.1 t 'COMPOSITE TRIM - — COMPOSITE RIM ASPHALT ....__......_....... ___.__SHINGLES TOP PLATE .__.._.._.......—.___.�_... HEAVY DUTY IN OPENINGS. N PLACE TRIM _ SLAB ON GRAI --- DOWNCAST LIGHTING O 0 � i II 9090 O/H DOOR 9040 0/H DOOR SOUTH ELEV. Iva• r-a" r-o' x I•-0. OPENING FOR VENTILATION --;. HORIZONTAL 'FIBER _. _ -- CEMENT" 5101NG IT", I"COMP051TE' ___.......___..._...._�--.—..� C RNER BOARDS .—_.___..._..__.... ITYP.1 EAST ELEV. LATE SLAB GRADE NORTH ELEV. ���'�' ve• - r-a- TRASH 4 RECYCLM FICKIE'$ CAN OCCUR DETWEEN 7A11 It IP" ONLY PER DUIG .. DUMPSTER E> LD c, fIILJ$Tpl YE811011T A In.. IF FLDOR PLAN do ELEVATIONS RECEIVE® NOV 13 2014 City of So. Burlington i I � THE HERITAGE I I UL AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. o II ROBERT BERMAN, LLC GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE —TO US ROUTE T NEW PAINTED I ^ I NEW PAINTED C _ CROSSWALK .I � ARXIP FXISTNEW S'WICONCRETE SIDEWALK I �i� i€ 0 / O Lor DE 16. / -t1('EXISTINGEDGE OFPAVEMENT- / I ; ( EXISn f G SPACESTOBEREDEVELOPED % 3051• '� ) WRH WMUEU_FAMILY BUILDING CONCRETESIDE�'J I j j t \ '— �� \ ( y� �,/y///// 1 i ', 1a-G_(/�_\ I — 1 � / o �'r\'�-►•� 11 / a3 ~ +rI Exlsn�lc c;RANITE \ \ \ `�, 7 / +- II .x MONU(MEN SIGN \ �/ ( I ' \ ♦ EXISTING PAVED-" U 1 Ilii 11 / / +I / t III f WALKWAY t/1 )/� II l /// i \ I (.. • \I 1 i \ \ PICAL EXISTIN MDT PARTNERSHIP, LLP ( (� I l t I / \ I \ I PARKING SPACES Q x }- } TO REMAIN 1 /+ m r.--- / J TYPICAL — / c/ ._ I AINT�RIP PAINTED ROSS P + + (2 KING + BE ELIMINP. D \ + LO,rT,r'''2 1251 MO NTAIN DRIVEtr // /,./� —\ I / / I EXISTIPIG ARE = 9/55 PiCRk'S / \ � \ tl I I PROPOSED AREIA = 10.1 A RES / / // + + \ + A +� 1 �^ I EXISTING OFFICE ~\\� I \ !r PROP BUILDING + +1 V t _ / RELY, KURTV. LAURA REICHELT,//"" / jr /J / ! 1\ \ 1• TRUSTEE$ 1 I I PR POSED WIDE PEDESTRIAN TO CITY OF ( SO TH BUNLILINGTON ALO GWESTERLV J 1 BO DAR`f SOUNDARYOKLOT 2IN THE SAME TION' S THE EXISTING)30' UTILTY EASEMENT. l r I I E ISTING 3cl UTILITY EASEFIskT ( / O CRY OFpOUTH BURLINGTONI 111/io /h t I \ ) J ENDF PROP09ED PEDESTIVIAN EASEMENT TO CITY, \ .,,/_—_ \\��48, .✓ / 30'U 4 _ - s °U7H eu4 EME.NTTO.(\\I \\ T� 0 EXI _ — .. -� .. ' J. -•, `.. ,-.. " .. �'" J EI PHEASgNI .., •\\\\( \„ } I ( I III I (I � // % — '. "`!-,,_'7"_--i� ------ ;�\\. LARK INNS. LP \ rl/ltll i/1/V11 111\(l l filll �\\ \ \ \ I l 11 ,•.. / /)1 \ili l l l i l i l l l 111 \ \\ 100�' /,/// (fill I I NOTES III�IIIlifitI I/! IHIII(Iit1I1 I} ----_ 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO PRESENT THE OVERALL LAYOUT OF THE EXISTING LOTS AND THE PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. SEE OTHER PLAN SHEETS FOR BOUNDARY, UTILITY, AND GRADING ((i I ( I I INFORMATION. I}}il\II{/Ji///// 2 T E EXISTING FEATURES ARE BY MOUR UX&DCKINSON(L&DEN SEPD UPON A FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED TEMBER 014 AND AN ALTA SURVEY PREPARED BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LAST --- REVISED ONI1-16-2010. 3. EXISTING CONTOURS ARE BASED UPON THE L&D SURVEY AND THE 2004 CCRPC ORTHOIMAGERY LIDAR DATA. f i l i�\ } \ UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT _--- lrr/llriN r OSSWALK I FJnSTINO CHAINUNKFENGE rf556.3 i6'PEDESTRIAN -BE"'51 \ 4 ` PROPOSED CL4G LIMITS PARKIN(; GARAGE \ 7 / "EX 11-FN<F OF PAVFMENr 3, ��N `f LOT J 27 GREEN MOL-NTAIN DRIVE PRQPOSLD 65 UNIT N, D / i� ,/ --EXISTING AREA = 3.70 ACRES MIJI 1 I -FAMILY BUILDING — t ems— _.! ROPOSED AREA =3.13ACRES POSED ' E%IST.TRAIL BED NGB IULDING t lilt lklillIrJtr llr�l�r 1 \ ��' LEGEND PROJECT BOUNOARYI X \\\�{ gP� — ABUTTING PROPERTj LINE EXISTINGTREEUNE I t — — EXISTINGEASEMENT� PROPOSED EASEME+ EXISTING FENCE CITY OF .SOUTH BSURFACE WATER BITjFER f URLINGTON----`^---- EXISTING CONTOUR' EXISTING PAVEMENT PROPOSED PAVEMEIITOR SIDEWALK GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 1G0 200 pn teal) 1,no•50X. SHEETINDEX 1 SITE PLAN 2 UTILITY PLAN 3 GRADING PLAN 4 EROSION PREVENTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 5 LANDSCAPING PLAN 6 WATER & SEWER DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS 7 SITE & STORMWATER DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS 8 EPSC DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS 9 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PROFILE L LIGHTING PLAN PL-1 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT LOCATION MAP N.T.S. PROJECT STATISTICS ZONING DISTRICT COMMERCIAL 2(C2) OVERLAY DISTRICT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT PARCEL ID 072 OW25 (25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE) 072 GQ27 (27 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE) PARCELAREA 9.55 ACRES(2S GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE) (EXISTING) 3.70 ACRES (27 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE) PARCEL AREA 10.12 ACRES (25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE) (PROPOSED) 3.13 ACRES (27 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE) BUILDING COVERAGE 40%MAXIMUM LOTCOVERAGE 70%MAXIMUM MINIMUM SETBACKS FRONT YARD 30 FEET SIDEYARD 10FEET REAR YARD 30 FEET BUILDING HEIGHT 40 FT MAXIMUM FOR PITCHED ROOF (WATER REQUESTED) WATER &SEWER EX ISTINGIPROPOSED MUNICIPAL SERVICES LOT COVERAGE LOT FRONT YARD COVERAGE (ONLY FRONTAGE ADJACENT TO G.M. DRIVE) EXISTING • 92% (720 BE 17785 SF) PROPOSED • 11.2% (870 BE 17785 SF) BUILDING COVERAGE EXISTING - 4.3% PROPOSED. 4.1% TOTAL LOT COVERAGE EXISTING • 22.9% PROPOSED • 28.0% LOT BUILDING COVERAGE EXISTING • 0% PROPOSED • 19.6% TOTAL COVERAGE -LOT EXISTING • 18.0% PROPOSED • 42.6% PARKING SUMMARY EXISTING SURFACE PARKING SPACES = 178 SPACE (BOTH LOTS) PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING SPACE =224 SPACE (BOTH LOTS) (PLUS 64 GARAGE PARKING SPACES) PROPOSED PARKING MULTI -FAMILY 64 GARAGESPACES 54 SURFACE SPACES 118 TOTAL SPACES (1.8 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT) OFFICEICOMMERCIAL 170 TOTAL BPACES (35 SPACES PER 100D SF GFA) TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING • 288 SPACES ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES COMMERCIAL 3 SPACES (FASTING) RESIDENTIAL SURFACE LOT 2 SPACES (PROPOSED) RESIDENTIAL GARAGE 2 SPACES(PROPOSED) TOTAL • 7 SPACES Uj ADA & LDR TABLE 13-7 REQUIRES 7 ACCESSIBLE SPACES (FOR 201.300 TOTAL SPA> REQUIRED PARKING SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS REQUIRES 282 SPACES 03-2-16 REV. PER PRELIM DRB REVIEW, ADD COMMERCIAL PARKING AS 014g15 REV . PER PRELIM STAFF REVIEW, ADD SPACES AT TRASH BLDG AB ' (III Date Revision These plans shall only be used for the paq—e shown below: LANDOW ER Q Bketch/Concept Q Act 250 Review THE STONEHI NGE INVESTMENT CLLAWSOTIO EIC' Q PTeliminary Q Construction Final Local Review Q Record Drawing BURLINGTON. VT05401 Project N,. APPLCA T THE SNYDER STRUCTION COMP ONANY. LLC 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive 14001 sMrYey 4076 SHELBU EROAD, SUITE JMR SHELBURNE,' 0B482 South Burlington, Vermont DC91gI1 pRR SITE PLAN Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. sn�tnM 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802-878-4450 1 www.LDengineering.com c 0 U No Text c 0 0) c •L co W 6 vJ 0 U EPSCLEGEND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SILT FENCE L-INFILTRATION AREA ®i '� �" EROSION LOG (12" DIA) ` _'- �'\` �++✓ �. SEE NOTES THIS SHEET STONE SWALE (TYP.) STONE FILL SLOPE GRAPHIC SCALE TREE REMOVALAND GROUND DISTBA ))) DISTURNCE SHALL SE MINIMIZED IN3TALlATION OF THE NEW 3 _ ..— $ .. ___. — I / / / / _... A \ / I' I I STONE FILL SLOPE (In teat) woODEDARF_n nccn.4o n. /—S ` -• ,., ` (` 032]-15 Hf]C COMMERCIAL PARKING AND REVISE EPSC MEASURES ABR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS d $ / ' // —� "/// j \ Dow Retaai°° By PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN CO-PERMITEE COVERAGE UNDER GENERAL PERMIT 3-9020 WHICH -�/ / _ �r _ _ _ s t/ 7 - ! !) � ) / Thew plans shall only be used for the purpose shown below: REGULATES STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES ( / /,. +' _-�' "`e, / / / f Q SkdctVConccpt Q Act 250 Review THIS PROJECT QUALIFIES AS HAVING A LOW RISK FOR IMPACTS TO WATER QUALITY, BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING: \ f / / �/ / / / / / 1 / 0 Preliminary Q Consnuction ,\ \\ / / / / f I / ! / / Final Local Review Q Record Drawing - ALL RUNOFF FROM DISTURBED AREAS PASSING THROUGH A 50 FEET WIDE VEGETATED BUFFER PRIOR TO \\\ \ I // / r l M'OODED AR / ! r V \ / / REACHING THE RECEIVING STREAM, DITCH, OR DRAINAGEWAY (ALL RUNOFF DIRECTED TO ONSITE INFILTRATION AREAS.) \ (� ((� \ 1 /r // / / / I y / ! w /^ / / // / / I project4001N A MAXIMUM OF 14 CONSECUTIVE DAYS BEFORE DISTURBED EARTH IS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. \ (� I , I .,I / ,-, / _, 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Survey - A MAXIMUM OF 2 ACRES OF DISTURBANCE AT ANYTIME EPSC - INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES: JMR THESE CRITERIA FORM THE BASIS FOR THE LOW RISK DETERMINATION. ANY CHANGES TO THESE CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT THE RISK 1. THROUGHOUT ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE OPERATION OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT OVER THE AREA OF THE PROPOSED I SOUStI Burlington, ANALYSIS BE RE-EVALUATED E DETERMINE IF THE POTENTIAL RISK TO WATER QUALITY, AND THE RELATED PERMITTING STORMWATER INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS AND I gton, Vermont ASR REQUIREMENTS, HAVE CHANGED. REDUCTION OF THE SOIL PERMEABILITY. IF EQUIPMENT MUST BE USED IN THE INFILTRATION BASINS FOR BUILDING OR UTILITY pmwa THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE LOW RISK SITE HANDBOOK FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES CONSTRUCTION, A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET OF OVERBURDEN SHALL BE IN PLACE TO MINIMIZE COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. EROSION PREVENTION & ABR TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THE SITE. AT A MINIMUM, THESE SHALL INCLUDE: Chcckcd -MARKING THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO PRESERVE EXISTING VEGETATION OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION 2. THE INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL AND INFILTRATE RUNOFF FROM THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DIG -LIMITING THE DISTURBED AREA BA THAT WHICH ACTIVELY BEING WORKED DURING THE INITIAL EXCAVATION OF THE BASINS, THE BOTTOM SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO 6" ABOVE THE FINISH GRADE Date -INSTALLATION OF STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS ELEVATION. AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING, DRIVES, AND PARKING ARE SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE, THE BOTTOM 11A1-1 -INLET PROTECTION AT ALL EXISTING AND NEW CATCHBASINS (USE SEDIGUARD FIBER FILTER) OF THE INFILTRATION BASINS AND SIDESLOPES SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO THE FINISH GRADES SHOWN. THE BOTTOM OF THE Scale BASINS SHALL BE IN NATIVE SAND. ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED UPON FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE -INSTALLATIONOFSILTFENCEALONGTHENNELS, NA PERIMETER :l THEDISTURBEDAREAANDAROUNDSOILSTOCKPILES Lamoureux &Dickinson UHALL BE CONTRIBUTING AREA. IF ANY FILL MATERIAL IS REQUIRED TO FILL VOIDS, ONLY APPROVED CLEAN NATIVE SAND - PLACEMENT OF EROSION MATTING IN CHANNELS, ALL SLOPES 3H:1V OR STEEPER, AND MULCHING ALL OTHER SHALL BE USED. I Consulting Engineers, Inc. Sheet number DISTURBED AREAS - SWEEPING PAVED AREAS TO REMOVE SEDIMENT 14 MOBS DfIV3, ESSBX, VT 05452 -APPLICATION OF WATER OR DUST SUPPRESSING AGENT(5) 3. SEE OTHER SHEETS (STORM DETAILS) FOR INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION NOTES. 8D2--78-4450 4 may.1-Dengi neering.corn C 0 CM O (V 00 (n r=) 0 0 U �5w $ELECTIVE REMOVAL OF UNDERSTORY GROWTH: - DO NOT OPERATE HEAVY EQUIPMENT IN THIS AREA OR STORE MATERIALS --- - SAVE AND PROTECT MATURE TREES LARGER THAN 8• DIAMETER -REMOVE DEAD AND DYING TREES \ -REMOVE BRUSH AND TREES SMALLERTHAN 8' DIAMETER - FOR TREES GREATER THAN ITDIAMETER, REMOVE LIMBS TO A HEIGHT OF 8 FEET \ t NEW s'WOOD BENCH r ( / _ - GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE , ~ \ N BENCH EW B WOOD a \ _L REMOVE EXISTING JUNIPERSHRUBS AROUND SIGN AFTER SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE INSTALL \ \ SE NEW CREEPING JUNIPER (JH) SHRUBS COM &PICNICARgA ��___-__ IETE SIDE _- \\ \\ V z I UP I BN V r DR I 'IV \4VP \3ELECTIVE REMOVAL OF UNSSRSTOR(GROWM / I \ I � t ..3T0kh'tElS fl7vClN . WP 3 CA \ HHH,,,%%% .-, \ 1 / / \\^-- h � I I / EXISTING GRANITE \ 'pE ENNIAL M1NG SC IkIJULE nWl= MONUMENT SIGN _ S /x EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN SHRUB REPLACEMENT NTS '!'iJ c;l' OM E T ✓` 1 ON CLEFVNG FARING / IF /n / 7 DI er FIFA I HY jF P / \ SOIL SPECIFICATIONS FOR TREE & SHRUB PLANTING AREAS 1 OR -'BO FA 1. LANDSCAPE BACKFILL SHALL BE PREMIXED, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 50% r I / HA r TOPSOIL, 25%COMPOST, AND 25%NATIVE SOIL. IN CASES WHERE THE NATIVE SOIL MEETS THE TOPSOIL SPECIFICATION, THE PROPORTIONS OF NATIVE SOIL MAY bDL BCY BE -- - ^,,,,/-f / ADJUSTED UP TO 75%. J PROPOSED 1 CV 2. TOPSOIL SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM NATURALLY WELL DRAINED SITES WHERE TOPSOIL /., MULTI -FAMILY BUILDING 1CA Z�,Iq' / OCCURS AT LEAST 41NCHES DEEP. TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE OBTAINED FROM WETLANDS. 7SA . / /^11SO TOPSOIL SHALL BE LOOSE, FRIABLE, FREE OF ROOTS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, STONES LARGER THAN I INCH, AND OTHER DEBRIS. LANT LIST Key Ha(aniea7Na Com an Nam Size Rr 1. Tree a AP dcersfreenrartil'Arrhunrr Fanmv✓ F—Maple 2"1.21/2 1, Me, 6 Fow brnrrc AL A.1l hterlvevla Allcghmly Scrvkcbcny 2"11,212'C.1 B&B, 6 fool bass, BN III rtigrv'Hur(lvgr' Hcdugc—,Birch 2"m21/?"Cvl. B&B, 6 fool brm„ CA Cs 1 fd' Pepb Dogwood I IR lot Cal. B&Borconmincr QB Imla, Ilafw n Id' Ginkgo 212 lol F.I. H&S,6f basnc GT G(M h 5h d,.r ' Non IavN cY 21R 103 Cal. H&B 6 f brmc HV Ha I' B Americev W.NoVel 1 L2 tot Cal. M. or wnmincr JV h, j B C Eastna Red CedN 6'tv) He gM B&B QH Qr A- ( Swamp Whhc flak 21(+ tol Cal, p&D,6 fom basm QR gr 1 Nanhem Red Oek 121/2 to3 (al MS.6 tool basnc AA AM I Ar b )ll 8 I(rnananmv Ar l pa_wo RN LTokebe Black Chokc." Ia lo2 16sh 1841 10 24po Hmgh C ner Coaamer CS C­­­'C�,dido Rcd Osicr Dogwood IB m24 Heigh C ncr Cy Caryl Am d-Hanlnul I8 1o24' Hcig,, Canto nor DL Or ll l Norlhern BuA Honcya,akly Alp 10 24'Hciot C-al ncr 11, 1k .11 1edo Wmtehe Ff le) tl 1o24"Height Cuamn.. IVm /le II S hem Genrke w Winmhcrry(malO I8 to24 ,n, C—im JH JvnlI,- horizonml6 gar Harhur Or P,nglwiper 8 Height mm Conulic MP Mnrefla Pensylvonlro Nonhem Bayberry I8'to24 Heght Cav"I PO Ph--. '.0f.—c-l" Clow' N,nebmk I8"to24 Height —I- PA I—umerlwna Wild American Plum 18 W2d Height C.Wd. PM Prunramvrdrma Bew.h Plum 18 tc29 Height —.I- RA Ahuv aromavw Greert l Pragasut S.- 18 m 24 H,01 Cama,rler RB Ahu.r vronavnea'G.m(.ow' Pro 1Fasgasnt Sumac 8 e12 Height Conmincr SA .hmpharicarpoa afbua Saowb-y 18 to 24 Height Coen., VP Vibrumrnrprundidrrmr eleckhnw Ifl l0 IX H1 J,1 Come nv PA j /i -✓/Y _ _ ae 3. ALL IMPORTED SOIL SHALL BE REASONABLY FREE FROM ROOTS, HARD CLAY, COARSE r Pnren"I Groa,"ro DIMENSION, GRAVEL, STONES LARGER THAN TWO INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION, NOXIOUS WEEDS. TALL }l�/J) CY I5 HH 5 FO , , GRASS, BRUSH, $TICKS, STUBBLE, AND ANY MATERIALS THAT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL '" IHV y. Y/_� __.... „- TO THE PROPER DEVELOPMENT OF VEGETATIVE GROWTH. CP _ \ 10 VP /9y l / / „� �} 4. BOTH TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL SHALL HAVE A TEXTURE OF FINE SANDY LOAM PER THE HA H, I Grrrn //, ..rp°-- USDA TEXTURAL TRIANGLE AND CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: 1. wafd reins(ragarinldav SlEYEN %PASSING 2- 1W 10 -100 80 50. 0 100 2040 BD-„ 2pM �l SLOPE TORE MAJNTAIN,D'ABrt// / /a�-J / / 20D 1C - mow/ i TALL GRASS CUT 237 ME3 0 / / / / CLAY LESS THAN 10% PER SEA30 off 5.5 TO • / ORGANIC MATTER TOPSOIL: 10-15% SUBSOIL LESS THAN 10% , / , 5. COMPOST SHALL BE FREE OF WEED SEEDS AND COMPLY WITH EPA REQUIREMENTS FOR 2 AI PDa _ - i'F,•'y/ / / / / / '� COMPOST. THE COMPOST SHALL HAVE A LOOSE AND GRANULAR TEXTURE, AND SHALL ,�•. 8 DL - - / MIT OF TREE CLEARING - POSSESS NO OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, AND SHALL NOT RESEMBLE THE RAW MATERIAL FROM WHICH IT WAS DERIVED. COMPOST SHALL COMPLY WITH TABLE 755.05A (PHVSICALPROPERTIES/EPA COMPOST MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS)OFTHE VTRANS r K:__T:-7wW-:OOD STANDARD 3PECIFIOATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. e. TO ASSURE THE GROWTH OF TREES.SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANI THE SOIL MUST NOT BE COMPACTED. ANY AREAS OF INADVERTENTLY COMPACTED SOIL WILL NEED TO BE DECOMPACTED USING A SUBSOILER. CHISEL PLOW, OR BY EXCAVATION AND RE PLACEMENT WITH UNCOMPACTED SOIL. DO NOT DRIVE EQUIPMENT ON THE SOIL BENCH_ / - / _ AFTER IT HAS BEEN PLACED OR DECOMPACTED. FINE GRADING AND PLANTING OF _- �' _ / = ~ - SPECIFIED LANDSCAPING MAY BE DONE USING LOW GROUND PRESSURE EQUIPMENT, IF S _ 3 THIS CAN BE ACHIEVED WITHOUT COMPACTION, z/ �,. _ ^^^^ ^*�.d 7. DONOTSTOCKPILE SOIL OR COMPOST IN WET OR MUDDY CONDITIONS.PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL TO PREVENT TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT OR DUSTAWAY FROM THE STORAGE AREA / //��. & SOILS WITHIN THE FULL SPECIFIED DEPTH SHALL HAVE A BULK DENSITY NOT EXCEEDING 1.5 Bran'. SOILS SHALL EXHIBIT THE FOLLOWING COME PENETROMETER READINGS: 1 I G -SURFACE RESISTANCE- LESS THAN 110 PSI (7.7 kgI P RENNIATERBASIN ESUBSURFACE RESISTANCE - LESS THAN 280 PSI 18.3 k9VATI f PINTINIA SCHEDMIX ULE t� '.raves , „/ PIANTING SCHEDULE J / 9. SOIL QUALITY AND DEPTH SHALL BE ESTABLISHED TOWARD THE END OF CONSTRUCTION FR r / (b25 SF) / / -' -.. / ` "P AND, ONCE ESTABLISHED, SHALL BE PROTECTED OM COMPACTION, EROSION, AND I f \l OTHER DETRIMENTAL INFLUENCES THROUGH THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. INFRTRATIONBASIN ; ( I (/$ / \ SROG `A •• P� / SEED WITH CONSERVATION MIX. ) / \ K ^ _ BASIN TO BE MAINTAINED AS I I I I) I I / ^Iq ^ 41 "^ 4 L TALL GRASS(OUT 23 TIMES 1 �'.. '.� PER SEASON) r ' o PLUMB TREE TRUNK _ r PLACE ROOT BALL ON \ q y- • J,.., TAMPED LANDSCAPE ' ^� PLANTING MIX OR ..., STORMWATERBASIN 24 'rµ-arW UNDISTURBED SOIL `1 \*tl('^ PERENNIALMIX-SEE 2"THICKSHREDDED 2- THICK SHREDDED 11 II %I ) /, PIANTING SCHEDULE HARDWOOD MULCH HARDWOOD MULCH ' ^/ MINIMUM OF 2"FROM STEM LANDSCAPE PLANTING MIX UNDISTURBED SOIL BREAK APART EDGE OF EXCAVATION WITH SHOVEL AND BLEND LANDSCAPE PLANTING MIX WITH EXISTING SOIL TO PROVIDE SOIL TRANSITION PLACE ROOTBALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL —.NDWNON IHE—N. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL N,A EME TREE PIT 3 TIMES THE BALL DIAMETER OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS MINIMUM OF 3' FROM TREE TRUNK LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLANTING MIX PLANTING MIX UNDISTURBED UNDISTURBED SOIL SOIL NTS PLANTING PLUMB TREE TRUNK PLACE ROOT BALL ON TAMPED LANDSCAPE PLANTING MIX OR UNDISTURBED SOIL 2" THICK SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH A MINIMUM OF 3" FROM TREE TRUNK CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS CONCRETEPAVEMENT LA'IIMIBYI'1'il'lL1)—� WcN PNg: nrrovrdc epp IY NrwI mH ra n Plug' in01 asl o be - a a Plu Plam 24 gm, Px oT510 10. MAY 0 8 2T5 City of So. Burlington GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 120 (In fee ) 11--30f1. 032 115 12 115REV. PERPRELIM DRB REVIEW ADD COMMERCIAL PARKING ABR Dare Revision By These plans shall only be used fur the purpose shown below (] Sketch/Concept Q Act 250 Review Prelirninary Q Construction Final Local Review 0 Record Drawing Project No. 14001 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive SD eY JMR South Burlington, Vermont qRR� LANDSCAPE PLAN 11-01-14 Scale Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Sheet aal 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 5 802-878.4450 w W w. LDengineeItng.corn WATER DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS 1.1 GENERAL This item Mall consist of the labor, equipment, and moleriol required for the ompleto cmetructi,n of the eatermains and swAcn which shall ;nclude m wtim, boekflling, pipe, wlw,, tees, hydrant,, elbows, reducers, and all other appurtenances heasseary for omplete wotermoin system as indicated an the accepted &swings. All materials and installations shall be opprawd by the local municipal water authority. 1.2 WATER MAN PIPE MATERIALS: DUCTILE IRON PIPE Pipe sholl be a minimum diameter of eight Inches (8") and =farm to current AMA MOO or ANSI Specification A21.51. Posh -on pint pipe Mall be m, im.m thickness Class 52. Pipe shell be cement martar-lined an the inside in accwdmce with AWWA C151.51 a ANSI Specification A21.4 ept that the cement -fining thickness Mall net bs Is than three -sixteenths ins, (3/16"). A plus ideranee of one -eighths inch (1/8") will be Permitted. 1.3 FITTINGS: Ductile Iran fillings shun be Cement -lined haw 350 pounds Uo,kinpressure. and be in accordance with AWWA C-110/ANS A21.10 and AWWA C152/ANSI 21.53 far compact fittings. Mechanical pint nuts and bats shall be high strength, low alloy steel par ANSI A- 21.11 . Ductile iron Fittings larger than twel. inches (12") Moll how a standard body length equal to Class 250 cast irm filing'. Cast con Class 250 filings cell be allowed n fie. of ductile iron fittings Insizes larger than twelve Inches (12•). Magolog retainer glands m on approved equal shall be used on oil wrticd bonds and as Mn m the plane. 1.4 GATE VALVE RESILIENT SEAT: Gate .I.. had be AWWA C 509 Standard Got. Valves with mechonlcal pinta of shoet « required on the plan.. All cal.' Mail be of cast or d.clas `,an body parallel brass seals, n - sing stem, Inside screw, double disk construction with .0. Ring Slam Seals. All .Ices to be equipped with a wlw bon for a minimum of 5.5' of cover material. The got. .Ice. Moll Won left and be designed far a working pressure of 200 psi. Each wive Mail haw maker's name. pressure rating, and year in which m n,foct,red cast an the body. Prior to shipment from the factory, each wlw Mall be tested by hydr«talk prmmre equal to twice the epaafied working pressure. Burred vaiwo shall be installed with a calve box. 1.5 VALVE BOXES: Cost iron three-piece ride -type; five and one -fourths Ins, (5 1/4') shaft; of, foot (6') bench depth. Coal iron cawr marked "WATER" and indicating direction of opening. 1.6 FIRE HYDRANTS MI hyd ant. ore to be 3-way, 5" mini... diameter and limited to the following makes: Waterces Pocer, Mueller Super Centurion or Kennedy Guardian K-810, and shall conform with AMA C502. Man Val Opining: 5 1/4 nchm N.A. Arrange. Too 2 1/2 inch he. nozzles NST threads. One 4 1/2 Inch pumper nozzle NST thread, Inlet Connection: 6 Inch meehankd 'pint. MEGA -LUG and threat Monk Operating NO: Standard 1 1/2" pentagon Direction of Opening: Counteralocykm wi Co.: Enameled hydrant red booy, polo , top determined by Town.. Depth of Bury. Hydrant sholl be installed to the mmufactureis Instructions with nozzles about 18" allow finish grade. 1.7 HYDRANT BRANCHES Hydrant as amblles shall consist of a six inch SB'j mechonicol pint gala cal. cont to AWWA C-509; a length of at. Inch (8 ) Clan 52 ductile Iron pipe with ail -lining; and the fire hydrant. MEGA -LUG retorter glands or approved equal Mall be used. The hydrant Mall how of least fifteen (15") between the bottom of the steamer cap and the ground. 1.8 CONSTRUCTION METHODS A. INSPECTION AND TESTING All i and fittings shall be inspected and tested n accordance with the onufaetu.ee'e apecifietfans and the alaremenlloned AWWA Specl0eatkn' The Contractor Moll furnish far opp-I certification from the pipe monufochms, that all teats no. own performed PP with satisfactory results. Pipe wall not be Installed without the Engineer'. Y in ers or Water Authorit's o row%. S. INSTALLATION Pipe' fittings c and a essorwe Mall be carefully handled to a,aid damage. Prior to line dole of a .ptwceof the project work by the Owns, the Contractor Mall replace any new pipe or occ y found to be defectiw at my time. including offer installation, at no expenee to the Owner. All installation, and testing shall be done in accordance with AWWA Standard C-600 and ANSI Specification A21.11. All pipes Mowing cracks shall be rejected. If cracks actor in the pore, the Cmtiactar may, at his o expense and with the approval of the Engineer, cut off the wockad palbn+ at o pant of least t..lw itches (12") from the visible limbs of the crack and um the sound portion of the pipe. All Pipes and fillings shall be cleared of all foreign molter and debris prior to installation and shall be kept clean .nth the time of accept-- by the Owner. At all Unnes, when the pipe laying i' not actually in Progress, the open end' 01 the Pipe wall be closed by temporary wct.rtighl plugs or by other approved means. If h when water is n the umcwork is seemed. m the plug shall not be reowd until all danger of water entering the pipe has passed. The pipe Mall be installed In trenches and of the line and grads +how an the Contract Drawing'. My deflection joints was be within the limits specified by the manufacturer. All piping antl appurtenances connected to the equipment wall be supported so that no strain will be imposed an the equipment. If the equipment monufact.rar's ,Pacifcction. include that pi ng (cads are not to be transferred, the Contractor shall submit certification of compliance. Concrete thrust blocks wall be Installed an all plugs, tees, and bendy deflecting 11 1/4 dog was or more. Cars shall be taken to -were that cwcr.te will not came in contact with flanges, joints, or bats. The required area of thrust block. are indicated an the plans a was be as approved by the Engineer. Whenever sew.s cross mder wat.moinw the wet -in wall be laid al such an eleration that the bottom of the walerman Is at least 16 inches Mow the lop of the lomlThis vertical sap" Ton shall be maintained for that portion of the wals,main ed within ten feet (10') horizontally of any sewer it crosses. There Moll be no physical connection between the dMubutim system and my Pipes, pumps, hydrant' or Ion" Mich are supplied or may be supPlied with a veal. that xor may be, contaminated In instances where the use of different types of pipe require joining, the Contractor shall furnish anal install all necessary adoplx' All IrenMing safety eas . macros wall De in callomn-ee with all applicable Slate and Federal Guidelines and m +pacified on the Plane Thar Contractor wall, at all times, keep the Trenches entirely free of water until all work is Miwetl and ready far Makfilling. After the .rioua pipeline. now Deen Installed. the trenches and other arms to be tilled wall be b.akmled to .ubgrade with, wherever Possible. matmfol e,aawted iron the trench. No bockfilling w11 be allowed on,any concrete masonry has set sufficiently, as determined by the Engineer. All material far baekilling shall be free of roals, stumps, and treat. Material and far backf,Iling trenches wall be free of stones weighing ow 30 pounds. No stones surfing Ow, one one one-hpll inches (1 1/2") In the longest dimension wall be placed within one fool (1') of the pipeline being bodKMled. Bockfill far oil pipelines +hall be placed In six Inch (6") lops, each layer being thoroughly eompoeted to not less than 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by the AASH70-T-99 Standard Procter. Particular precautions shall be token In the placement and compaction of the bockfill material in ortler not to damage the pipe or structure. The bock"' wall be brought up evenly All watermoins wall be Installed with a minimum cover depth of .i. (6'). Surplus excowled mat lots not used far backfll veal be disposed of In manner Mlhlaalory to the Engineer. All surplus material or to be ramow0 promplly and disposed of so as not to be objectionable to abutters or to the genera public. V.I. boxes 'nare to be installed an all buried Iws. The boxes shall be cast Won With o m S. and one -fourths inch (5 1/4') diameter and long wough to extend from thewlw to finished grade. The boxes shall enclose the operating not and slulfing box of the cal.. Vo1w boxes shall not transfer leads into the wlw. Covers Mall be class fitting and Ent-tlkht with the tap of the cover flesh with the lop of the box rim. Cover. Mall ee marked Wotei with a w indicating the direction of opening. Vol. boxes wall be three piece slip-typ9rro The Contractor Mall pro ide a stable, temporary PVC marks, opprawd by the ( .g of all gale valve' curb slops. and at the end of waterlines to o paint sox caches 8-)nabow nniM grade. The marker shall be noted securely into the ground. C. FIELD TESTING Except do otherwise directed• all pipelines shall be tesle0. Pipelines laid ;n exmwtim or bedded in concrete Mall be tested prior to backflling or the placing of conc,ote, and any exposed piping sholl be tested prior to held painting. The Contractor ,hall fumiwh all gauges, testing plugs, caps, and all other necessary equipment and labor to partarm leakage and pressure test in sections a 1 an opprawd length. Each w1.0 ,action or maximum of me thauwnd feet (1.000') of the pipe shall be tested. All Utter requked far testing sholl be potobe. All testing Mall be conducted in the presence of the Engineer. Far the press... test, the Contractor wall decamp and maintain 200 pounds par square inch far two hours. Failure to had the designated pressure far the two-hour period constitutes a failure of the section tested. TM leakage loot Mall be performed rently with the pressure test. During the teal, the Contractor Moll m - the quantity of water required to maintain the feat pressure. Leakage shall not exceed the quantity given by. L - SO (Square root of P) / 133,200 where: L Leakage in gollons/hour S Length of pipeline tested D - Diameter of pipe in inches P Avs,oge lest pressure in psi All testing wall be cand.cled fin accordance with AWWA C-600 latest r Asmn. Should any section of the pipe fail either the prsewre or leakage tests, the Contractor Mall do ewrything necessary to I«at, and repair or replace the dsfectiw pipe, fittings, Or )oints at na expense to the Owner. D. DISINFECTION: Chlorination of the wotermoin Mail be conducted only offs, the man has been flushed and a dear streom is obtained as determined by the Engineer. The Contractor Mall furnish all labor, equipment. materid0. and tools necessary to disinfect the pipe and opp.rtenmces In accordance with the AWWA Standard far Disinfecting Wats,mains, C-651. with the exception of the tablet method. The method of disinfection Mall be by the continuous feed method unless ath-hot .ppro, by the Engineer. After filling, flowing, and the addition of chlorine sdution, the free chlorine cancentrallon within the pipe Mall be at lead 25 mg/I. Tha chlorinated water Moll remain In the main far a period of at I...1 24 hours. At the and of this period• the treated water In all portions of the man shall not haw a resided of Ian than 10 mg/of free chlorin. M disinfection sholl be performed now the s.par viaton of the Engineer. The disinfection proems Mall be deemed acceptable only after (2) et an oppr omplm of water from the sowed, disinfected main taken by the Engineer and tested awd lZmtory show no evidmce of bacteriological contamination. Disinfection shall conform to the latest AMA C-651 revision. The pipeline and appurlwoncea shell be maintained in an neontominoted Condition unto final acceptance. Disinfection wall be repeated when and where required at no expanse to the Ower until final acceptance by the Owner, E. FROST PROTECTION OF SHALLOW WATERLINES Wet,dinew with Isn than sic feet (6') of cow over the crown, or where Ind oted an the plane, shall be protected against freezing by Installation of four Inch (4") thick Styrofoam SM neoWtng waste with o total width of four feet (4') w iwke the pipe diameter, whichswr is great.. The waste Moll be placed sin Inches (8') be. the crown of the man after compaction of the six inch (6•) cal imun Maly a.- the crown. aCora Mall be ex.cind by the Contractor during backfill and ampactim over the wtyofeem Meet, to prevent damage to the sheets. Styrofoam SM wheel' Mail meet the canprmsiw strength r,q.Ir outs of ASTM D1521-73 and Mall be as manufactured by Dow Chemkal Company Mkfand, Michigan• or equi.lent. In no can. Moil the waterlines how In. than four feet (4') o/ cover ow the top of the pipe. SANITARY & STORM SPECIFICATIONS 1) SANITARY AND STORM SEWER PIPES SHALL BE OF THE SIZE AND TYPE INDICATED ON THE PLANS PVC PIPE SHALL BE SDR 35 CONFORMING TO ASTM 0-3034. ASTM 0-3212, AND ASTM F-477. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M-190 FOR ACCGMP PIPE AND AASHTO M-246 TYPE B FOR POLYMERIC COATED STEEL PPE. CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M294, TYPE S (SMOOTH LINED). 2) ALL NEW GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER MAINS (8') SHALL BE LEAK TESTED BY A LOW PRESSURE AIR TEST AND DEFLECTION TESTED. THE LOW PRESSURE AR TEST WILL BE USED TO SIMULATE INFILTRATION OR EXFILTNATKN INTO OR OUT OF ALL GRAVITY SANITARY SEWERS. ALL TESTING WILL BE CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE ENGINEER. AIR TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C626-80. THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME FOR A PRESSURE DROP FROM 3.5 PS TO 2.5 PSI SHALL BE 0.7 MINUTES PER 100 FEET OF 6' SEWER. AFTER THE FINAL BACKFILL HAS BEEN IN PLACE AT LEAST 30 DAYS, THE DEFLECTION TEST MAY BE PERFORMED. NO PIPE SHALL EXCEED A DEFLECTION OF FIVE PERCENT (5X). IF THE DEFLECTION TEST IS RUN USING A RICID BALL OR MANDREL, IT SHALL SHALL HAVE A DIAMETER EQUAL TO 95X OF THE INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE. THE TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHOUT MECHANICAL PULLING DEVICES. ALL MANHOLE AND PIPELINE MATERIALS, METHODS AND TESTING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY AND STATE STANDARDS AND THESE PLANS. 3) ALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE VACUUM TESTED. FOR MANHOLES UP TO 10' DEEP THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME FOR A VACUUM DROP FROM TO" TO 9" OF MERCURY SHALL BE 2 MINUTES FOR MANHOLES GREATER THAN 16 DEEP THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME SHALL BE 2 MINUTES AND 30 SECONDS. MINIMUM AREA OF BEARING SURFACE OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK (IN SQUARE FEET) MMMMMM®M®MM®MMM®OMMMM ®®®M®®MM®®MMMMM®Z®MM= ®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®® 3500 PS 3500 PSI CONCRETE CONCRETE END AREA BEARING AINST END AREA J,v GAUNDISTURBED SEARING AGAINST SOIL UNDISTURBED SOIL 'I YPICAI. IFNS-I)IIADI-:NI)S-CAPS TYPICAL RINDS NOTE: PLACE 4 mil POLYETHYLENE BETWEEN FITTING AND THRUST BLOCK THRUST BLOCK END AREA NTS NOTE: ON CROSS-COUNTRY SEWER LINES, RIMS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. ADJUST RIM WTH -- CONCRETE RISERS AST... GIs PRECAST REINFORCED CONC. MANHOLE CONE AND RISER COPOLYMER POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC RUNGS WITH 1/2• GRADE M STEEL REINFORCEMENT ON EWAL, 12' O.C. 5•-i iI-48' PRECAST CONCRETE CAST N PLACE SHELF AND INVERT RUBBER GASKET FOR WATERTIGHT M.X. cONST. (TYP. ALL PIPES) 2• RISE (MA%) CHARNE GRANULAR BA0 FILL FOR �iRIMC U ES MT SPEC _ as LLOGE MAX PAVEMENT 12. LIMIT I" e COVER IEBARON NO PAMNC OF INTERIOR BfaCXwmK OT JOINTS WITH MORTAR SHALL BE ALLOWED GROUT FRAME TO RISER COAT EXTERIOR OF CONCRETE WITH TWO (2) COATS OF WATERPROOF SEALANT 3'-O• SEE SPECIFICATIDNS FDIR Yx TESTING REDIINENENIS 0 RING RUBBER GASKET N ACCORDANCE WITH A. T.M. C-M3 AND AS.T.M. C-361 OR BUTYL ROPE WELDED STEEL UK FABRIC STANDM STANDARD LI N263 6 (1,2,3 6 4 FT.) VARIABLE STANDARD 3•_p PLUG LENGTHS /\ (2.3 B 4 FT.) tY HEIGHT. 3/8' TD 3/4- EACH wA D.C. DDOOUNOTDUSE LIMEST0ONE EXTEND BEDDING TO LIMITS OF EXCAVATION TYPICAL PRECAST SANITARY MANHOLE NTS SPRINKLER SYSTEM PIPING r-BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEWCE 2" WATER METER TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE WATER DEPARTMENT. CONFIRM SZE NTH FINAL MECHANICAL PLANS 1 - REDUCER (AS REQUIRED) BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE] DOMESTIC WATER LINE BUILDING SLAB SHUT MANHOLE CHANNEL NTS I --WATER SERVICE ALL DOMESTIC SERVICES AND FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS THAT ARE CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH A BACKROW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY, AND AN APPROPRIATE THERMAL RLINGTN SYSTEM IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS . THE SOUTH METER SHALL WATER DEPARTMENT AND THE THE WATER PLUMBING CODE. THE WATER METER SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATER DEPT. WATER SER VICE BACKFL0W PREVENTION DETAIL NTS BACKELL WITH APPROVED EXCAVATED MATERIAL xORDI1CIILY COMPACTED N e LIFTS THE SIDES OF TRENCHES ♦ FT. OR MORE IN DEPTH ENTERED BY PERSONNEL - APPROVED NOG FREE BAGFILL THOPOUOAY COMPACTED N 6• LIFTS (NO STONES LARGER THAN 1 1/2" DIAMETER) b APPROVED GRAVEL OR SAND Felt D.1. o PIP, 3(�' CRUSHED STONE aR 3/8" TO 3/4 CRUSHED CRAWL FOR PVC r PIPE. 1 UNDISTURBED SOIL PROVIDE COVER MARKED "SEWER' PROVIDE WATERTIGHT 5-1/4' DIAMETER X 36" CAR TALL VALVE BOX TOP WITH A TOP RANGE. INSTALL BOX FLUSH WITH INSTALL 3/4' CRUSHED STONE FINISH GRADE SUPPORT FOR VALVE AS NOTED BOX TOP ON PLANS 12" 6. FLOW SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT NTS �GROUND - VALYE BOX 6' UNDISTURBED MINIMUM SOIL �I BOLTED HYDRANT TEE- - CONCRETE 1 WATER THRUST MAN BLOCK LEDGE PAYMENT HYDRANT MANUFACTURER TO BE APPROVED BY THE NYDRANT FLAG ENGINEER AND MUST MEET CITY STANDARDS. _ 18"-21' MINIMUM 6' BURY Fi F. GATE VALVE THRUST / BLOCK `CRUSHED STONE SEE WATER TRENCH DETAIL FOR BEDDING 6' DIA. D.I. PIPE REQUIREMENTS LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT ALL NJ GLANDS SHALL BE 'MEGALUC OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTE: HYDRANT GRAN SHALL BE PLUGGED. HYDRANT DETAIL NTS ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINIBN GRADE VILLAGE OF JERICHO. THE SBWD SHALL BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TO INSPECT ALL JOINTS, FITTINGS, MAIN LII TAPS, APPURTENANCES AND WATER LINE CROSSINGS. uNDISTUPH.-11 Date I Rev fThese plans shall only be used for the pultp a shown below: 'o l� R AVER rs LEss N. IF Q Sketch/Concept Q Act 250 Review j RACE .• T INsuunaR Q Preliminary Q Construction I 1SCARD,.. e. rs 4UITABLE non ivRIAL oVER PIPE. OF eu Final Local Revl Q Record Drawing 2" ��� �� mvEa OVEN MSS�MO (b' IS OUTSnE DIAMETER OF PIPE) P rgjl 140( 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive s-, JMR D South Burlington, Vermont DcP1 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL AT ABR _� ALL THE NCHES POF Drar ENTI [MIYSFREE WATER Ahc, UNTIL ALL FOR IS FINISHED XU.INDETAILS AND READY OW IS NLL & SPECIFICATIONS WATER & SEWER Dee D42 FEET Nnli• LEDGE PAYMENT LNIT 11-0 A MNNUM OF 3 BRASS WEDGES SMALL INSTALLED AT EACH RK .MINT FOR S' BE D.I. PPE. $call _TYPICAL WATER TRENCH N FS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL SE APPROVED BY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS SPECIFICATIONS AND THESE PLANS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL UTILITIES BEFORE EXCAVATIONTO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY MIGSAFE-AT 14M8-0IGSAFE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM EXPLORATORY EXCAVATIONS AS NEEDED TO DETERMINE THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF THE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED WORK. 3. UTILITIES INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WERE OBTAINED FROM LIMITED FIELD SURVEYS AND AVAILABLE PRIOR SITE PLANS AND MAY OR MAY NOT BE EITHER ACCURATE OR COMPLETE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTUIIES AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO ANY UTILITY, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN HEREON. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONNECTOR RECONNECTALL UTILITIES TO THE NEAREST SOURCE THROUGH COORDINATION WITH UTILITY OWNER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING VEGETATION, PAVEMENT AND STRUCTURES NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCTMIS PROJECT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREMOVE ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, DEBRIS AND WASH FROM THE SITE UPON COMPLETION CF CONSTRUCTION, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE OWNER 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AT HIS OWN EXPENSE FOR ENSURING THAT THE DUST CREATED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT CREATE A NUISANCE OR A SAFETY HAZARD. WHERE AND WHEN DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE OWNER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO WET SECTIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA WITH WATER, APPLY CALCIUM CHLORIDE OR SWEEP ASPHALT ROADS WITH A POWER BROOM M DUST CONTROL. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ERECT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE ESTANDARDSAND TOWN REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNS SHALL BE IN PLACE WHILE ANY WORK IS UNDERWAY WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FLAGGERS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL AT ALL TIMES THAT WORK IS UNDERWAY ON ME SHOULDER OR WITHIN THE PAVED PORTION OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. 7. ANY SURFACES, LINES, OR STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO THE CONDITION AT LEAST EQUAL TO THAT IN WHICH THEY WERE FOUND IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF OPERATIONS. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THEIR WORK WITH THE OWNER AND TENANTS OF THE ADJACENT BUILDING, AND SHALL MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THE CONTINUED OCCUPANCYANDUSEBYTHETENANT. TEMPORARY ACCESSFOR PEDESTRIANSAND VEHICLES SHALL BE PROVIDED AS NECESSARY. 9. THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SEPARATION FOR SEWER, STORM, AND WATER LINES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND ME VERMONT WATER SUPPLY RULES. 10. HEALTHY EXISTING TREES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, ON AND ADJACENT TO ME SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 11. ALL FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN B INCH LIFTS AND THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO %%OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D89B STANDARD PROCTOR, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 12. AT COMPLETION OF GRADING, SLOPES, DITCHES, AND ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SMOOTH AND FREE OF POCKETS WITH SUFFICIENT SLOPE TO ENSURE DRAINAGE. GRADATION REQUIREMENTS MATERIAL SIEVE PERCENT (NO SIZE PASSING 2- 100 X 1 1/2- W-100 X CRUSHED GRAVEL FOR SUBBASE #4 30-60 X VT SPEC 704DSA FINE S100 0-12 X 02M 0-6 X FINISH GRADE ASPHALT TREATED FELT TO BE USED BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND CONCRETE CURB. WIDTH AS SHOWN 4• THICK, 4000 PSI CONCRETE B' THICK AT DRIVE CROSSINGS 2% MAX CROSS SLOPE—•- CONCRETE CURB — e MIN. 12' THICK CRUSHED GRAVEL - PER VT STATE SPEC y704.05 I. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM STRENGTH OF 4,000 PS AT 28 DAYS, AIR ENTRAINED WITH AN ADMIXTURE PRODUCING AN AIR CONTENT OF BETWEEN 5X AND 7X BY VOLUME. 2. HALF INCH (1/2-) TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING TWENTY FEET (20'). SIDEWALKS SHALL BE SCORED TO A DEPTH OF ONE INCH (1') EVERY FIVE (5') FEET. CURB AND SIDEWALK SECTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATED BY ASPHALT TREATED FELT, 3. AFTER THE INITIAL CURING PERIOD IS OVER (APPROXIMATELY 28 DAYS), ALL EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL RECEIVE TWO COATS OF MTI-SPALLING COMPOUND. 4. SEE ARCHITECTUAL PLANS AND DETAILS AT BUILDING ENTRANCE LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK FOUNDATION AND SUPPORT DETAILS. 5. CAST IRON DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES SHALL BE PLACED THE FULL WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK AT THE TERMINATION OF ALL NEW SIDEWALKS CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL N.T.S. 1/4" RADIUS 6'' 1/2- RADIUS PRIOR TO PAVING, THE PORTION 2' OF CURBING TO BE IN CONTACT WITH PAVEMENT SHALL BE COATED • 7• WITH EMULSIFIED ASPHALT P 12 '1 PAVEMENT CLASS B CONCRETE END AREA - ...I S.F. L—B.J NOTES: 1) CURBING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN 10- SECTIONS WITH 1/8' JOINT BETWEEN SECTIONS. 2) CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIAL CONFORMING TO AASHTO DESIGNATION M-153 ( 1/2- SPONGE RUBBER OR CORK, ) 3) ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED NOT LESS THAN 5X AND NOT MORE THAN 7% CONCRETE CURB DETAIL N.T.S. LEVEL LANDING 5' IN. slolEwALk RAMP B �g 1/4'REVEAL _ B SIDEWALK SIDEWALK ROADWAYSURFACE RAMP RAMP 8.3%MAXIMUM C 24' e a o DCe D //LGG4 CONCRETE CURB SECTION A -A \CURB CAST IRON 7 rwanmu aUnrn��— SINGLE RAMP ON TANGENT: SIDEWALK ADJACENTTO CURB. p 5 R MP MIN. WIDTH 2, , I I RouxDIxG,T InAtl x CURB TRANSITION SIDE WALK RAMP .:` ...........:.' . , ..`.... ..` ..'.' ..: CART IRON DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SECTION B-B r CONCRETE CURB SECTION C-C SIDEWALK RAMP DETAILS NTS UNDISTURBED SOIL BACKFTLL WITH APPROVED , EXCAVATED MATERIAL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED IN 6' UFTS I Q.5 ■ FOR SANITARY SEWER, IF COVER IS LESS MAN 5.5', PLACE MIN. r I� THICK INSULATION BOARD SUITABLE THE SIDES OF TRENCHES FOR BURIAL OVER PIPE. IN NO CASE SHALL THE PIPE HAVE LESS 4 FT. OR MORE IN DEPTH ENTERED BY PERSONNEL _ M THAN 4' OF COVER OVER THE CROWN. STAGGER JOINTS SO SHALL BE SHEETED OR SLOPED TO ME ANGE THAT NO TWO JOINTS ME ONE OVER THE OTHER. OF REPOSE 8' 12' DEEP INITIAL BACKFILL BE SELECT NATIVE SAND OR I'D' IS OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE) SAND BORROW (VTRANS SPEC 7MO3A) D THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT 1p o �_ ALL TIMES KEEP ME TRENCHES ENTIRELY FREE OF WATER 3/6' CRUSHED STONE UNTIL ALL WORK IS FINISHED FOR PVC AND PE PIPE AND READY FOR BACKFILUNG LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT D+2 FEET UNDISTURBED SOIL TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER & STORM TRENCH NITS BAOrFILL " APPROVED EXCAVATED MATERIAL T ONDUCKLI cONPAL•TDD BW UFTS TE SIBS OF DK—ES 4 FT. ON MORE IN DEPTH ENTERLD BY PERSOHIEL SHALL BE SEEED OR SLOPED TO THE ANGLE OF REPOSE MINIMIAl Ir FABRIC OVERIAP CEoi[%TILE THE CpIRACmN SHALL AT AM TIMES KEEP DBE TRENCHIES END. PREE a AT N UNIT ALL wDaK Is FassHm AND BEADY FOR BACNF1UUNG UNDISTURBED SBL 3/4' STONE FOR PE OR PYC PIPE PERFORATED STORM PIPE STORM INFILTRATION TRENCH FOR ROOF DRAINS NTS INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. THROUGHOUT ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, ME OPERATION OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT OVER ME AREA OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS AND REDUCTION OF THE SOIL PERMEABILITY. IF EQUIPMENT MUST BE USED IN THE INFILTRATION BASINS FOR BUILDING OR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET OF OVERBURDEN SHALL BE IN PLACE TO MINIMIZE COMPACTION OF ME UNDERLYING SOILS. 2. DURING EXCAVATION FOR THE INFILTRATION BASINS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE CARE TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF THE NATIVE SOILS WITH SEDIMENT OR FILL MATERIAL. THE STORMWATER INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS. 3. THE INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL AND INFILTRATE RUNOFF FROM THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. DURING ME INITIAL EXCAVATION OF THE BASINS, THE BOTTOM $HALL BE EXCAVATED TO OF ABOVE THE FINISH GRADE ELEVATION. AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF ME BUILDING, DRIVES, AND PARKING ARE SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE, THE BOTTOM OF ME INFILTRATION BASINS AND SIDESLOPES SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO THE FINISH GRADES SHOWN. ME BOTTOM OF THE BASINS SHALL BE IN NATIVE SAND. ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED UPON FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE UPSLOPE CONTRIBUTING AREA IF ANY FILL MATERIAL IS REQUIRED TO FILL VOIDS, ONLY APPROVED CLEM NATIVE SAND SHALL BE USED. 4. A MINIMUM 4' THICK LOAMY SAND TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED OVER ME BOTTOM AND SIDESLOPES OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY SOIL AMENDMENTS AS NECESSARY, BASED UPON A SOIL TEST. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A PERMANENT VIGOROUS GROWTH OF THICK GRASS THROUGHOUT THE BASIN AND CONTRIBUTING SWALES. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WRH SEED MIX AT THE SPECIFIED RATE, PRIOR TO MULCHING. 1 1/2' TRIG( VIRANs TYPE III WEARING COURSE SEE SITE PLAN FOR GRADING I 2' THICK VRANS 7 TYPE 11 BASE S-1/4-/FT. CONCRETE CURB COURSE tr i. _'O O oAND AN NIN DRIVES P%J11dNO AREAS - - O - ,O O OO O\ O - 'p `O' O`_ •O •0\'•OOP"t0 SLOPE TO OF tNA FINISH DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE CRATE O AUGMENT (VRANS SPEC. J04,08) M1RM 50DX GEOTEXTLE M 1. IN ALL AREAS WHERE UNSTABLE/UNSUIT SUBGRADE SOLS ME PRESENT, THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE OVER-EXCAVAIED TO REMOVE 111E UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND LLEO WITH SAND BORROW OR SELECT NATIVE MATERIAL. 2. IN AREAS OF EXISTING GRAVEL SUBBASE, GEOTEXTLE MAY BE WITTED WHERE THE COMBINED TOTAL DEPTH OF THE NEW AND EXISTING GRAVEL SUBBASE S AT LEAST 2�OWEWR, IN ALL AREAS WHERE THE NEW GRAVEL SUBBASE DEPTH IS AT LEAST W. DE GEOTEXTLE SHALL BE INSTALLED. 3. SUBGRADE BOX. AND NEW SUBBASE GRAVEL ALL BE ADEQUATELY COMPACTED IN LIFTS TO NOT LESS THAN M OF THE OPTIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (AST. D698). 4. THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE SLOPED TO DAYL10HT THE SUBBASE MATERIAL WHEREVER POSSIBLE. TYPICAL DRIVE AND PARKING AREA CROSS SECTION NTS RESERVED KING SLOPE PAD 1/8' MODIFIED R7-8 SIGN SKIN (SEE AIL) 5' PER FT TOWARD CURB RESERVED RAMP RAMP PARKING CONCRETE5- DOWN DOWN ® 2 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE (SEE STD. DETAIL C-3A) 60' VAN DEPRESSED R]-BA SIGN �� ACCESSIBLE � 4' CURB WHITE SYMBOL 2 LB PER FT FLANGED CHANNEL STEEL POST 4' WIDE WHITE STRIPE (TYPICAL) B' MIN, 5' MIN. 6' MIN. FOR Ii47E5: VAN ACCESSIBLE SSIBLE SPACE (SEE PLAN) 1, ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE j NTED. 2. EACH ACCESSIBLE SPACE SHALL BE SQ DESIGNATED WITH THE MODIFIED R7-8 SIGN SHOWN. VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES L HAVE THE ADDITIONAL. R7-11A SIGN MOUNTED BENEATH, SUCH DESIGNATING 714 ACCESSIBLE'. THE LOWEST SIGN ON THE POST SHALL BE MOUNTED A MINIMU OF 4 FEET ABOVE GRADE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN. ACCESSIBLE Ia RKING SPACE DETAIL NTS GROUT FRAME TO TOP HEAVY DUTY 4' CAST IRON HEAVY DUTY FRAME AND OF STRUCTURE FRMSQUARE AND 24' SQUARE CRATE 24• SQUARE CRATE FINISH ' A A PROVIDE WATERTIGHT RUBBER NOTE: BOOT. IF STRUCTURE ADJUST FRAME ELEVATION AS ELEVATIONS PREVENT ME USE OF A BOOTED CONNECTION, ME NEEDEDWITH CONCRETE RINGS �2q•�.I—` I PIPE SHALL BE GROUTED NUM AND NON -SHRINK MORTAR. DO NOVUSF BRICK NON -SHRINK MORTAR AND VARIES COVERED WITH MIRAFI 50OX ON THE EXTERIOR ALL BAFILL THOROUGHLY 38' MIN. COMPACTED IN 8' LIFTS 24' X 24' PRECAST REINFORCED B' CONCRETE CATCHBASIN PROM[ WATERTIGHT RUBBER PIPE DESIGNED TO MEET AASHTO M-20 LOADING BOOTS FOR ALL STORM PIPE REQUIREMENTS OPENI 6' OR LARGER 2 FT SUMP -. B. IL- 12' 24• !1 LEDGE PAYMENT I B• �1 • LIMIT " •. '•A .. 6" / 3/B' CRUSHED EXTEND BEDDING TO , ' STONE BEDDING '� LIMITS OF EXCAVATION LED PAYMENT 3/g' CRUSHED STONE BEDDING 24'X24"SQUARE STRUCTURE LIMI'J ROUND STRUCTURE NOTE: CERTAIN CATCHBASINS MAY REQUIRE THE USE OF A 24"X24' SQUARE STRUCTURE BASED UPON THE VERTICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ME RIM AND INVERT ELEVATI S. OTHERWISE, ME CONTRACTOR MAY SELECT EITHER STRUCTURE THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE ME NUMBER, E, AND ORIENTATION OF PIPE OPENINGS. TYPICAL CAT HBASIN NTS WHERE AREAS OF LOAMY VERY FINE SAND OR � VERY FINE SANDY LOAM EXISTAT THE BOTTOM OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN, THE BOTTOM SHALL BE OVEREXCANATED AND ME MATERIAL REPLACED WITH ONSITE SAND BORROW NTS 4' LOAMY SAND TOPSOIL EXISTING GI 5' HICK 2112' 0 CRUSHED STONE 4' MINIMUM � F / \/ \ NATNE SAND OR LOAMY SAND 21/2' G CRUSHED STONE MIRAFI 140 GEOTEXTILE SURROUNDING CRUSHED STONE i WITH MINIMUM 24-OVERLAP AT TOP INFILTRATIONBASIN CROSS SECTION 4- TOP AND PLANT GRAM AND STRUCTURE DIAMETER TO VARY AS REWIRED ACCOMMODATE THE SIZE, NUMBER, AND ANGLE O PIPES PRECAST REINFORCED W CONCRETE - 0 L DESIGNED FOR OR HHBA LOADING UNDISTURBED SOIL U L,EXTEND BEDDING TO W LIMITS OF EXCAVATION w Date I Revision I By These plans shall only be used for the purpose shown below: Sketch/Concept Q Act 250 Review Preliminary 0 Construction Final Local Review Record Drawing 14001 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, Vermont DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS Checked SITE & STORMWATER D�e 11-01-14 Lamoureux 8r Dickinson Scale Consulting Engineers, Inc. snrrt nambcr 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802-878-4450 www.LDengineering.com Ln C4 00 0 Q C U rn �=3 W O^ U) O U 1. EROSION MATTING WILL BE USED ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN MOM OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 2. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING MATTING, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME. FERTILIZER, AND SEED. SOIL SURFACE SWILL BE GRADED SMOOTH WITHOUT ROOTS. STONES OR OTHER PROTUSIONS THAT WILL PREVENT THE MATTING FROM BEING APPLIED IN FULL CONTACT WITH THE SOIL SURFACE. 3. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE MATTING IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF MATTING EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE MATTING WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" PORTION OF MATTING BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE MATTING OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12- PART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE MATTING. 4. ROLL THE MATTING (A) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. INSURE THAT THE APPROPRIATE SIDE OF THE MATTING IS AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL MATTING MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STMES IN APPROPRATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE MANUFACTURERS STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE FOR THE PARTICULAR PRODUCT AND APPLICATION. IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE MATTING. S. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL MATTING MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP DEPENDING ON MATTING TYPE. 6. CONSECUTIVE MATIING SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE - WITH THE UPPER MATTING PLACED OVER THE TOP OF THE LOWER MATTING) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 12" OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS ENTIRE MATTING WIDTH. EROSIONMATTING INSTALLATIONDETAIL MTS ' - OR AS SHOWN AS PLAN DRAW ROW 12' MIN. 24DEEP ROCK BORROW PER VAOT SPEC. 703.05 OR TYPE H STOINE PER VAOT SPEC. 706.04 PIPE FABRIC MIN. 24" SUMP r FABRIC 2. PROFILE 24' DEEP ROCK BORROW FLOW LINE VADT cPEC.. JD.i.05 -ROCK BORROW ROCK BORROW SHALL CONSIST OF BLASTED ROCK BROKEN INTO VARIOUS SIZES THAT N1LL FORM A COMPACT EMBANKMENT WITH SECTION VIEW (AT PIPE) OLDS. THE MAXIMUM SIZE INITS SHALLICH BE N WIDEST DIMENSION ND THAT SIZE BE INCORPORATED INTO A 24 INCH LAYER OF ROCK EMBANKMENT STORM OUTFALL DETAIL NTS NOT DISTURB VEGETATED SLOPES BEYOND LIMITS OF THE DITCH. PROVIDE 4" OF TOPSOIL AND ESTABLISH DENSE GRASS (CONSERVATION MIX) ORIG! AL SLOPE VARIES 12" ROCK BORROW PER VA07 — VAOT SPEC. 703,05 OR TYPE II ADD 4' GRUBBING ) STONE PER VA07 706.04 MATERIAL AND CRA55 /// / (MIN. 24" DEEP, SEE PLAN) COVER DHV SPILLWAY / OAF1 FABRIC OR E J/ U M EQUAL UNDER AND TO SIDES OF STONE. UNDISTURBED SLOPE TRENCH TO DRAIN GROUND 2' WITH A MIN, SLOPE OF O.ODS FT./FT. TYPICAL STONE DITCHDETAIL NTS TURF ESTABLISHMENT SPECIFICATIONS ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT DO NOT HAVE AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (PAVEMENT, SIDEWALKS, ROOFS) OR ARE NOT LANDSCAPED WITH BARK MULCH, SHALL BE STABILIZED NEW GRASS COVER. ALL SEEDING AND MULCHING FOR ESTABLISHING NEW GRASS COVER SHALL BE COMPLETED AFTER APRIL 15 (AS SITE CONDITIONS ALLOW) AND PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15. PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL, AND THE APPLICATION OF SEED, FERTILIZER, LIME (WHERE APPLICABLE), AND MULCH SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: I. A MINIMUM OF 4' OF APPROVED TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL AREAS PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE DONE WHEN THE GROUND OR TOPSOIL IS FROZEN, EXCESSIVELY WET, OR OTHERWISE IN A CONDITION DETRIMENTAL TO THE WORK. FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL, THE SURFACE SHALL BE RAKED. ALL STONES, LUMPS, ROOTS, OR OTHER OBJECTIONAL MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED. 2. URBAN OR CONSERVATION SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY IN ALL AREAS AT THE SPECIFIED RATE. 3. FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED ONLY AFTER PERFORMING A SOIL TEST AND BE APPLIED BASED UPON SOIL DEFICIENCIES LIME SHALL ONLY BE APPLIED AS NEEDED BASED UPON A SOIL PH TEST. 4. MULCHING SHALL FOLLOW ME SEEDING OPERATION BY NOT MORE THAN 24 HOURS, MULCH SHALL BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY OVER THE AREA AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. SITE CONDITIONS MAY WARRANT THE APPLICATION OF A TACKFIER OR NETTING TO HOLD THE MULCH IN PLACE. IF NECESSARY TO RETAIN THE MULCH. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY AN APPROVED TACKIFIER, OR NETTING, WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 5. HYDROSEEDING MAY BE USED IN UEU OF SEEDING AND APPLYING HAY MULCH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. HYDROSEEDING SHALL INCLUDE THE APPLICATION OF WOOD AND/OR PAPER BINDER MULCH. THE BINDER SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS, BUT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1500 POUNDS PER ACRE ON SLOPES LESS THAN 15X AND NOT LESS THAN 2000 POUNDS PER ACRE ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 151E HYDROSEEDING ALONE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AFTER SEPTEMBER 15, 6. ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3H:1V SHALL HAVE EROSION MATTING APPLIED OVER THE SEED. ALL DITCH CENTERLINE GRADES GREATER THAN 2X OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL HAVE EROSION MATTING APPLIED OVER THE SEED. EROSON MATTING SHALL CONSIST OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET WITH 100% AGRICULTURAL STRAW MATRIX STITpI BOUNDED WIN DEGRADABLE THREAD BETWEEN TWO PHOTODEGRADABLE POLYPROPYLENE NETTINGS, NORTH AMERICAN GREEN 5150 OR EQUAL. NORTH AMERICAN GREEN OS150 MAY BE USED IN LAWN AREAS, ONLY WHEN SEEDING TAKES PLACE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 1. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FULL GROWTH OF GRASS IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE -VEGETATED. VEGETATION GROWTH SHALL BE PERMANENT AND SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT EROSION OF THE UNDERLYING SOIL UNDER ALL CONDITIONS OF PRECIPITATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING AND CARING FOR SEEDED, MULCHED, AND AREAS OF ESTABLISHED VEGETATION UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. GRASS SEED MIX %OFMD( TYPE OF SEED SD CROSSFIRE N TALL FESCUE 25 TITANIUM TALL FESCUE 25 BIADERUNNER TALL FESCUE 15 HOME RUN PERENNIAL RYEGRASS 5 KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS tOD SEEDAT5LBS PERT, -SOFT. WOOD STAKE, DRIVEN A MINIMUM OF 12- INTO THE SOILAND SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 4- APART EROSION LOG- SEE PLAN FORLOCATIONS , FLOW THE EROSION LOG EMBEDDED2- SHALL INTO ESUL OR THE BOTTOM OF THE EROBION LOG SHALL HAVE S' OF HAY MULCH AL BE IN CONTIN WITH THE UNDERLYING PLACED ON THE UPSLOPE TOE NOTES: 1. TIGHTLY ABUT THE ENDS OF THE EROSION LOGS -NO GAPS. 2. INSTALL EROSION LOGS PARALLEL TO CONTOURS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. EROSIONLOG SECTION NTS 1. BEGN AT THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6' DEEP X 6' WOE TRENCH WITH APPRODLMTELY 12' OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE LW -SLOPE PORTION O THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A RD. OF STMLES/SAKES APPROAMATELY 12' APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKPAL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STARING. FOLD REMAINING 12' PORTION OF BLANKET TALK OVER COMPACTED BOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WIN A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12' MART ACROSS THE WROTH OF THE BLANKET. 2. ROLL BLANKET IN DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW N BOTTOM OF CHANNEL. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WIN MPROPRATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PIACING STARES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ABOVE IN THE STAPLE PATTERN CUIOE. 3. PLACE CONSECUTIVE BAKETS END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH A 4'-6' OVERLAP. USE A DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES STAGGERED 4' MART AND 4' ON CENTER TO SECURE BLANKETS. 4. FULL LENGTH ENE OF BLANKETS ALONG SIDE SLOPES MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A HOW OF SIAPLES/STNES APPROAIMTELY 12- APART IN A 6' DEEP X e' WOE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER SIAPUNG. 5. THE IE"REAL END OF THE BLANKETS MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" MART N A 6- DEEP X 6' WIDE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STARING. EROSION MATTINGFOR CHANNELS TUTS THREE DIMENSIONAL NATURAL FIBER INLET PROTECTION DEVICE VANS INLET OTTRECTION DEVICE, TYPE 2) 11 SECURE USING 3-1/2- PRESSURE DISKS AND 1 PLASTIC TIES FASTENED INLET GRATE (TAN) INLET PROTECTION PRODUCT MANUFACTURERS: SEDIGUARD (WWW.EARTSUPPORTSYSTEMS.COM) BLOCKSOM k CO. (WWW.BLOCKSOM.COM) OR APPROVED EQUAL CONCRETE CURB (WHERE APPLICABLE) EXTEND 1" MINIMUM AND 3" MAXIMUM FROM EDGE OF GRATE (TYP) INLET PROTECTION NTS INLET CASTING 4B-AR.AlE URE DISK ZIP TIE BOTTOM LAYER GRATE SECTION PLAN NOTES, 1. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT OR MATERIAL TRACKED, SPILLED, OR WASHED INTO THE TOWN RIGHT OF WAY BEFORE RAINFALL OR WITHIN 24 HOURS. WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 2. THE USE OF CALCIUM CHLORIDE AND/OR WATER MAY ALSO BE NECESSARY TO CONTROL DUST DURING CONSTRUCTION. 3. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTIONEXIT NTS )RIVEN ROUND )r'. 1) USFT ONLY MANUAL METHODS OF INSTALLATION ANO CLEANING WITHIN WERANp AND BUFFER 20NE. 2) PRI R TO BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION OR EARTHMOWNG, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A CONTINUOUS SLY FENCE AT THE LI IT OF DISTURBANCE SHOWN ON THE STE PLAN. 3) FR%N MATERIAL SHHALL NOT BE USED TO KEY IN THE BOTTOM OF THE SILT FENCE. IF NECESSARY, GRANULAR BORROW SHHALL BE USED BY ME CONTRACTOR TO KEY IN THE SILT FENCE RATHER TITIAN FROZEN NATIVE MATERIAL. 4) RE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SET FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF TOPSOIL STOCKPILES AND AT OTHER LOCATIONS AS NE CO QQEEIV `, TEMPORAR Y SILT FARNEZ NTS MAY 08 Z225 City of So. Bu 224 224 222 222 NEW MULTI -FAMILY BUILDING 220 220 it 218 218 j 216 218 214 Lk- 214 I 212 212 1 210 210SEWER PIPING 208 208 I I 206 206 II II 204 204 202 202 1 200 200 198 88 RECEIVE® 196 ,96 MAY 0 8 2015 oaruv E191 l84.00 1sa City of So. Burlington � 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 t 03-21-15 REVISE PROFILE WITH ADJUSTED ALIGNMENT ABR SEE UTILITY PLAN (SHEET 2) FOR HORIZONTAL °ate Re°isi°n LAYOUT AND MANHOLE RIM & INVERT DATA Then pinsshallonlybeusedforthepurposeshownbelow- GRAPHIC SCALE p Sketch/Concept Ao 250 Review PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 0 Preliminary Q DraFinal Local Review � Record Drawing Record Project No. ( IN FEET) 1 Ine„ =20 It. 14001 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Survey JMR South Burlington, Vermont Design g ABR Drawn SEWER SERVICE Cheked PROFILE Dare 11-01-14 scale &Dickinson AS NOTED Consulting Engineers, Inc. Sheetnumber LoLamoureux 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802-878-4450 9 v .LDenglneering.com w FINISH GRADE � O Z= Q ug U K i EXISTING GROUND ------ -- i w z O INSULATE OVER PIPE WHERE COVER IS LESS THAN 5.5' � U / SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR FOUNDATION FOOTPIRINTE ( 8. pR35 PVC i EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE yc ' y�c �6 EXISTING 8' AC SEWER MAIN nt�M Rat HEDk LECArt iht —Type V Medium a«Y oa,�na'a+' BetaLED Catalog AL: ARE - . . tm -1 13 Mil, 0 13 lov 1311 LED AEflFY1FH'Fi.NCE SAEGB N. twIl !il Wi1O W'aln7��if��[�)♦`�Yi_�t�sc�t�1F��SfAT1� W ;11• E1•<�FN/�iI7■Sf41Ti eT■ q FF ... A 0 ■hid FE�LW��RF7 EIF7p �YY�tEY7•tS41♦tfi�t 1i4Dl�M� fvT4 �iiu EIW W v�i i{C�tlDi�i*'�tF:�tISi��IE!� ■�si�iFii�ioir'.i�ii�iiiiu iV19fiS� tGIF4O�62Tb:l� Wean Er>f■areci��x���r7��W��Du� f' �lgf3F!'A7• W�`iF r�WWW N��R:1• EEi�t�C)•��Yb•�iii[8D■ F F, n�D : 1.40 PFfl FD P,fVIANf.F9Y#L1• am III IBM n{oil p �®[��y®yam®{�®■�;®'® E��4■■ �R�l■■ F��IEFFEy��7�`��MMM E1{Fp'7�Fk1 sl/�tryI�Uyi�17■ ■�AFi��y��{�� W R � �MWn<C7i�71F11WWR<fS'iy±6B111�Ri�1`x'Fi�GfIf1Wi11■`'iF■iSfil(Tl ..�7k,��1�115H7NN�f1 ��1IIIgg1\WiglFl ■fi■ iI�L�R■ R17p7 61M �-'Pf31Rf i61R 1 ■t1:7[:T[u�fQR■1 WW W ill�tAi� E1WR �Y>•iRF�fiFY7•■�Fi■�FI■�n■FSFiS��yTb�il ���n ��■ ®k]R� 9F!■1 ''' � 7FH��N�N�1{�1ry?'liN[•k1■7 kHBlFE�I■t+fib �A[��6WfNLM7�vi�■t �Dk'y4aipF�11�[��yFW�J{EJ'�y���■[�1�1■�L1I�iFF.I�IM f�E�gEt��tk[�1 i���R.f�I�Pp}L�I qq {pW�il'AL71k71■1 R '� pBR�lp��yF�I 1RWR ��97If�9sf■�Of{7�pWOpW �di■`]if)•NB■ W F h7F7M ■RRR dLvk77N W ■UFS■ R Mnt[✓,�11m �:3®BWR7FW�WF �FYRQJ7F��F�Ol�p7iPF�HpF�TiFiL�L]iFpW7WgFp�k �_��]L�A■ N`�I1�.1■� 1 WF7W G7 PIEIR�i1WW �iC1fAA■`F��fVt O RECEIVE® MAY 0 8 2015 1 LIGHTING BPECIFlGTMS LEGEND DESCRIPRON LAMPTYPE DISTRIBUTION TYPE MOUNTING HEIGHT ®* BETA EDGE LED AREA LIGHT BDLm,7F00KCOLORTEMP. TYPE"I-CUTOFF 27 FEET POLE MOUNTED 0 >R BETA EDGE LED AREA LIOHT 100 LED, 7BLOIL COLOR TEMP. TYPE V -CUTOFF 27 FEET POLE MOUNTED wd BETA EDGE LED AREA LIGHT BULED,7DOOKCOLORTEMP. TYPE III - CUTOFF 12 FEET BUILDING MOUNTED GRAPHIC SCALE 50 D 25 50 1DO 200 (In hN) 1 irrch � SOR. City of So. Burlingtcn No Text UNIVERSITY FVERMONT N 30ff VOL 30 PG 288 LOCATION PLAN 15'WIDE PEDESTRIANEASEMENTTO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON N.T.S. AS RECORDED IN VOL 211 PG 247 ROBERTBERMAN.LLC I WF VOL 912 PG 225 1'XE CMF IAG THE HERITAGE I / AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. VOL ]TB PG 2B4 Bg� I EXISTING 5y0'3T BUILDING I 4-X4'CMF IPS/ ---TO US RTE 7 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR. N83°9/'13 0,05' g392 It S85°10'i7'E 9.m I-IRF DBGF — 4'XI-CMF 2.5 A.C. LEGEND: — EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE SIDELINE OF EXISTING EASEMENT SIDELINE ON PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK NIF NOWORFORMERLY IRF IRON ROD FOUND ■ CMF CONCRETE MONUMENTFOUND IPS IRON PIPE SET 2 IRS IRON ROD SET SURVEY POINT (NO MARKER FOUND OR SET) B.G. BELOW GRADE A.G. ABOVE GF"E I' B NOTES: iB WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BUR1-1NGTOI4 AS RECORDED IN VOL IN PG 144 I I LOT 1 EXISTING AREA 3.]0 ACREB PROPOSED AREA • 3.1�AC�S CMF0.2A.G.EXISTING ' STURBEDPROPERTYLINE �- PROPOSEDOREDISSOLVEpPROPERTY LINE 12 x 38' EASEMENT TO GREFN MDT PARTNERSHIP, LLP m MOUNTAINPOWER a S6.B1' NIF CORPORATION AS RECORDED IN 73°59'52W vOL 45B PG 188 $� I VOL 490 PG 894 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT TO GREEN \ IPS MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION AS 4-X4CMF RECORDED IN VOL 109 PG 51B 0.2 A.G. IPB CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LOT- N PROPOSED 30' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EXISTING AREA• 9.55ACRES 10.1VOL 1A PG 2. EASEMENT TO CITY OF SOUTH PROPOSED AREA • 10.12 ACRES 'Y GTONONG WESTERLY SO HOARY AL�Q BOUNpARY OF LOT 2 IN SAME LOCATION 30' a �� AS THE EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING BUILDING KURT V RIECHELT ry WF o 181 PG 383 v. VOL 18] PG 3B5 l WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT TO TO THE CITY OF SOUTH g I INBURLINGTONVOLBD RECORDED 924 �I I IN VOL 1B0 PG I80 349°30'42'E Y CITY OF SOUTH BURII! 1702-1720 SHEL ROAD CONM NIF VOL TBTPG GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 200 a00 (M feet) 1 IZ • 1001L 1. THIS PLAT WAS COMPILED FROM FIELD SURVEYS AND RECORD RESEARCH INCLUDING THE USE OF THE FOLLOWING PLATS: A. 'ALTALIACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY, IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION EMa GE HEALTHCARE, 25 S 27 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR. SOUTH HURLNGTON, VT. -BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS DATED MARCH 2O08, LAST REVISED NOV. 15, 2010. AS RECORDED IN SLIDE #549 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. 8 'GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION, CORPORATE HEADOUARTERS BUILDING. SOUTH BURUNGTC VERMONT.' BY SARGENT, WEBSTER. CRENSHAW AND FOLLEY, DATED MARCH 221983, LAST REVISED JULV 10, 19M AS RECORDED IN SLIDE C188 OF THE C11Y OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS, C. -NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.. SHELBURNE ROAD, SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT.- BY WEBSTER-MARTIN, INC, DATED ONE, 1913 AS RECORDED IN SLIDE N101 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURUNGT0�1 LAND RECORDS. 2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON SURVEY GRADE GPS OBSERVATIONS AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY, SEPTEMBER. 2014. 3. THIS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO OTHER EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTSLOF-WAY. 4. ALL IRON PIPES SET ARE 1- INSIDE DMMETERAND ALL MONUMENTATION FOUND IS AS NOTED. 5. A SURVEY WAS COMPLETED IN SEPTEM8EFL j014, USING A COMBINATION OF GPS BASELINES AND CONVENTIONAL SURVEY UIPMENT. THE METHODS AND THE RESULTING ERROR MEET OR EXCEED THE MINIMUM PRECISION REQUIREMENTS FOR URBAN SURVEYS. ^ APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Al P BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, yA^, VERMONT, ON THE_ DAY OF 2015 SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID OWNER RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS _ DAY OFME BARRY MOSSMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE BY STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC., MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST 1LAWSON LANE (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) BURLINGTON, VT 05482 VOL.918, PG. 225 TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS PLAT IS BASED ON ,,1111111//// INFORMATION ABSTRACTED FROM PERTINENT DEEDS t AND/OR OTHER OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND MARKERS EVIDENT may` ON THE PROPERTY, AND CONFORMS WITH THE DOUGLAS i REQUIREMENTS OF V VSA § 1403. DATED L. THIS DAY OF ,2015 HENSON No. 656 till jI III, CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. ,2015 RECEIVED FOR RECORD AT_ O'CLOCK _ M.. AND RECORDED IN SLIDEM_ RECEIVE® MAY 0 8 20`5 City of So. Burlington STORAGE I I ® i � I _____________________ _ ________ ________ I I __________ _ _______ 1 I I I 2 3 I I 1 I 5 c 1 a 9 10 I I I ___________ __ _________I___________ __ _____-__I ________ _ I I I I I I I I I I 0 I2 13 I N IS If I Il IB I I I I I I I I I I I I I 81KE H I 43 62 fl I f0 59 56 I 51 54 55 STCRAGE R I I I I ¥ I I I I I I I I I I I I � p M /SIN V O C M W co L� M PARING® RAGE I I KECK/ SPRINKLEam 19 I( II II I I II II it I 20 I � aI -_- ELEV -- _ ♦. VEST I I i II I E. MACH. 22 - ---- - o 0 �J I O II ' 21 II I 63 I I 25 52 21 51 1 11 II jl 21 I I it 50 I I I� II 26 19 29 i9 �1 I I� II 30 I 11 31 46 32 15 j I I I I I I I I 33 I N I I II I I I 31 I I 13 35 12 36 I STAIR I j I I 31 I I 11 I 35 10 S9 FF1 EXHAUST FAN WELL IV m 4. 4. mE PARKING LAYOUT Snyder Homes neighborhoods to come home to 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 p 802.985.5722 - f 802.497.0701 www.SnyderHomesVT.com h DATE REVISION GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PLATE r-0' X W- OPENING F VENTILATII iLAB GRAD / WEST ELEV. -�:' `�7-- Ve• - r-p• 50L8 DOOR POSITIVE LATCHING AND DOOR CLOSURE LIGHTS ON MOTION 5 5OR R 1 1 I I I I � 1 /r 1 �� I r o 1 LIGHTS 0 I 1 I I 1 I I I t I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I t10T10N SE 50 9090 OVERHEAD DOOR 30AS DOOR 9090 OVERHEAD DOOR POSITIVE LATCHING AND DOOR CLOSURE iDl FLOOR PLAN lir - r-a- DECORATIVE LOUVER ASPHALT SHINGLES 0 9 IXL CORNICE ITYP1 IXL FASCIA ITYP,) 'CONPOSITE TRIN CO"POSITE RIN - O"NCa5TWTON LIGHTING OItSENSOR 6 b � i � I 9040 OJH DOOR 9090 O/H DOOR SOUTH ELEV. wr - r-o' r-0' x 8'-0• OPENING FOR VENTILATION r SHINGLES 119 HORIZONTAL ' CEIIENT' SIDING %3 'CONPOSITE' CORNER BOAR65 ITYP.) anap EAST FLEW. -��ve• - r-tr � ASPHALT SHINGLES TOP PLATE •------ ---OAST LIGHTING N RO - -- -� ON NOTION SENSOR -- =_ HORIZONTAL FIBER W GFDEIjT $IR1NS+ ITY � `—' - o SLAB ON GRADE NORTH ELEV. TRASH t RECYCLM PICKUPS CAN OCCUR WTWM '(AM t SPH ONLY -13 OMPSTER WLmcs Al .NL.ISTON %VN1dNT PLAN k ELEVATIONS RECEIVE. MAY 0 8 2015 City of So. Burlington July 31, 2017 Re: #SP-17-51 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer ly, d mond J. B Ir Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com sout )'1ii1jr iii 1'.qi"I' PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-- (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑✓ Administrative ❑Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Green Mountain Drive, LLC 210 College Street, Suite 201 Burlington, VT 05401 658-7400 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): Bk 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): 985-5722 The Snyder Construction Company, LLC nferland@snyderhomesvt.com 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Nelson Ferland - The Snyder Construction Company, LLC The Snyder Construction Company, LLC nferland@snyderhomesvt.com 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 985-5722 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: nferland@snyderhomesvt.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 27 Green Mountain Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0720-00027 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): A 65 unit multi -family building and related site improvements were previously approved for Lot 1 (27 Green Mountain Drive). This amendment application requests approval for 1) the construction of a concrete pad for grills and outdoor seating on the south side of the building and 2) recalculation of the required parking. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): A 65 unit multi -family building and related site improvements were previously approved for Lot 1 (27 Green Mountain Drive). Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): 65 unit multi -family residential building (no change from prior approval). d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): The multi -family building has three stories of living space above the parking garage in the basement level (no change e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): The multi -family building has three stories of The new residential building has a parking garage on the lower level, plus 3 living space above the parking garage in the basement level (no change). £ Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 66 multi-familv residential units. g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): No full time employees are proposed for the multi -family building. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): The project is located in the Stormwater Management Overlay District. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 136,465 Existing 0 % / Proposed 19.6 % / Sq. Ft. 0 sq. ft. 26,695 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 18.0 % / 29,010 sq. ft. Proposed 42.6 % / 58,035 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing Proposed d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 1,500 sq. ft sq. ft. residential use sq. ft. & no frontage * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ no change b. Landscaping: $ no change c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): concrete pad = $5,000 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 42 peak hour trips (no change) 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 7:30 - 8:30 AM & 4:30 - 5:30 PM 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Friday 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 2017 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. ,� Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 E NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the accurate to the best of my 1 as part of this application has been submitted and is APPLICANT AVJAE OF PROPERTY OWNER NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete omplete dministridve Of cer D to The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 January 20, 2016 Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 Re: Approval Extension — 25-27 Green Mountain Drive - #SD-15-18 Dear Mr. Rowe: Please be advised that the So. Burlington Development Review Board at its January 19, 2016 meeting approved your request of January 14, 2016 for a three (3) month extension to the time limit in condition #12 of the above referenced decision. You now have until May 20, 2016 to obtain a zoning permit for this project. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, f�ymond J. Be air Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT OS403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com �ULamoureux Et Dickinson Engineers Surveyors Planners Wetland & Soil Scientists January 14, 2016 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: SD-15-18 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of The Snyder Residential Building Company, LLC in regards to the Development Review Board's approval of Final Plat application #SD-15-18. Condition 12 of their decision requires that a zoning permit be obtained within 6 months of the approval, which is dated August 20, 2015. Therefore, a zoning permit must be obtained by February 20, 2016. Although the applicant plans to proceed with construction in the near future, it will not be possible to complete the various other prerequisites and obtain the zoning permit prior to February 20th. We are requesting that the Development Review Board grant a 3 month extension for obtaining the zoning permit. We understand that you have received the final plans, mylar for recording, and Notice of Condition, satisfying the various other conditions of approval requiring the submittal of information prior to applying for the zoning permit. Please present this request to the Development Review Board at the next available meeting. Please advise if the applicant should be represented at the DRB hearing. Sincer Andrew owe P.E. c: Chris Snyder 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802.878.4450 www.'I-Dengineering.com ♦ Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service Lamoureux 8t Dickinson Engineers Surveyors Planners Wetland & Soil Scientists October 15, 2015 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: SD# 15-18 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Final Plat Plans Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of The Snyder Construction Company, LLC to submit the final plat plans for 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive. The following items correspond with the numbered items of the Development Review Board's Decision dated August 20, 2015. 3a. The plans have been revised to show the parking spaces to the west of the residential building as future spaces to be constructed if needed. As discussed with Dan Albrecht on July 21, the spaces directly adjacent to the trash & recycling building will be paved to allow vehicles accessing the building to turn around. 3b. The plans have been revised to include a vehicular access easement in the same location as the 30 feet wide pedestrian path easement through Lot 2 (also coinciding with a portion of the existing utility easement). 16. The following documents relating to the pedestrian & vehicular easement are enclosed: Partial Discharge of Mortgage Certificate of Director and Incumbency Certificate Easement Deed Property Transfer Tax Return 17. A Report on Title to Real Property (dated September 22, 2015) is enclosed, which was approved by David Rugh on October 9t'. 18. A Notice of Conditions of Final Plat Approval is enclosed. 19. The final set of plans in PDF format are on the enclosed CD. 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802.878.4450 www.LDengineering.com ♦ Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service 23. Mylars of the Site Plan and Property Plat are enclosed. Also enclosed on CD is a digital copy of the property plat. The following are enclosed for your review & approval: - 3 copies of the approved revised plans - Mylar of the Site Plan and Property Plat - CD with PDFs of the final plans and digital copy of the property plat - Partial Discharge of Mortgage - Certificate of Director and Incumbency Certificate - Easement Deed - Property Transfer Tax Return - A Report on Title to Real Property - Notice of Conditions of Final Plat Approval Please contact our office with any questions. Sincerely,,; Andrew Rowe P.E. c: Chris Snyder PA2014X14001\CITYTinaKcoverletter.doc gravel & shea ATTORNEYS AT LAW 76 at. Paul Street Post Office Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Telephone 802.658.0220 Facsimile 802.658.1456 www.gravelshea.com September 22, 2015 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Report on Title to Real Property Ladies and Gentlemen: This is to certify that we have examined the records identified below and made certain inquiries as described below with respect to the record title to the real property known as 25 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, Vermont (the "PropeltX") in preparing this Report on Title to Real Property (this "Report"). The examination was conducted at the request of The Snyder Construction Company, LLC in connection with the conveyance to the City of South Burlington of a thirty foot (30') wide pedestrian path and vehicular access easement located on a portion of the Property (the "Ci!y of South Burlington Easement") and described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. In preparing this Report we have: Examined the land records which are maintained by the City of South Burlington as indexed in the General Index as required by 24 V.S.A. §§ 1153-11.54, 1161 and 1163 and as made available to the public (the "Land Records") with respect to the chain of title to and encumbrances on the Property. 2. Made inquiry of the Zoning Enforcement Officer of the City of South Burlington (the "Zoning Administrator") and reviewed the contents of the files provided to us by the Zoning Administrator in response to our inquiry with respect to the Property (the "Municipal Records"), but only with respect to the following limited matters which may be disclosed in the Municipal Records ("Municipal Zoning Matters"): (a) The dates of the adoption of zoning ordinances applicable to the Property. (b) The requirement, if any, that a zoning permit, building permit, or certificate of occupancy be issued under the zoning ordinances which were disclosed to us pursuant to such inquiry with respect to the Property. (c) Whether any notices of violation with respect to the Property had been issued and were not resolved on the date of our inquiry. gravel & Shea ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of South Burlington September 22, 2015 Page 2 Reviewed the Land Records for evidence during the Period of the Search that the Property was a part of a "subdivision," as that term is defined in §5-902 of the Vermont Health Regulations or in Section 3.02 of the Environmental Protection Rules or as defined in 10 V.S.A. Chap. 64 and the regulations adopted pursuant to such statute, which required the issuance of a State Subdivision Permit and/or was required to have a Public Building Permit or Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit on account of construction of improvements on the Property during the period when such regulatory schemes were in effect. Upon discovery of evidence that one or more of such permits were required, we have made inquiry of and, to the extent available, examined the records as indexed in the office of the Regional Engineer, Agency of Natural Resources Essex Junction Regional Office or applicable municipal records in the event of a delegation of authority to the municipality (the "Regional Engineers' Records") with respect to the following limited matters affecting the Property: (a) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a State Subdivision Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 1218 (repealed 2002) (the "State Subdivision Regulations"). (b) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a Public Building Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 1302 and § 1305 (repealed 1987) (the "Public Building Regulations"). (c) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 61 (repealed 2002) (the "Water Supply and Wastewater Regulations"). (d) Whether the property is now or was required to have a Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit under the regulations adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 64 (adopted 2002) (the "Potable Water Supply and Wastewater Systern Regulations"). (e) 1f a permit was required under any of the foregoing, then whether such permit was issued and, if issued, whether the terms of the permit required written certifications or other documents to be filed with the Regional Engineers' office or the municipality. (f) Whether there are notices of violations in the Regional Engineers' Records. 4. Reviewed the Land Records and the files maintained by the District Environmental Office (the "District Environmental Office File") for evidence during the Period of the Search that the Property is a part of a "development," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3), or a "subdivision," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. §6001(19), subject to the limitation expressed below with respect to development activities outside the boundaries of the town or city where the Land Records are maintained and development gravel & shea ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of South Burlington September 22, 2015 Page 3 activities by any "person," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(14), other than the specific persons whose names appear in the chain of title after 1968, with respect to the following limited matters: (a) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a permit pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 151 (State Land Use and Development Law) ("Act 250" ). (b) If an Act 250 permit was required, whether such Act 250 permit was issued. (c) If an Act 250 permit was issued, whether the terms of the permit required written certifications or other documents to be filed with the District Commission. (d) Whether there are notices of violations in the District Environmental Office File. In preparing this Report we have assumed that the information provided to us by each person of whom we made inquiry was correct and complete at the time it was given to us and did not omit any matter of which such person knew or should have known about from information in the records in such person's control at the time of our inquiry. We have not conducted any separate inspection of the Property nor any review of any records other than the records identified in this Report. This Report is addressed solely to matters affecting record title to the Property. In providing it, we have assumed that at the time of our examination of title, all documents theretofore delivered to the municipal clerk had been correctly and completely indexed, and that all oral statements made to us by governmental officials with respect to the status and content of public records were correct and complete. We also have assumed, without independent verification, the genuineness of all signatures, the due authorization of all recorded documents and instruments affecting record title to the Property, and the enforceability of all such documents and instruments in accordance with their terms. Based upon the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, and subject to the exceptions and limitations set forth below, we hereby report the following: Owners of Record. Marketable title to the Property under Subchapter 7 of Chapter 5 of Title 27 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated, subject only to the mortgages, encumbrances, permits and liens described below is vested in Barry Mossman, Trustee of The Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust. The City of South Burlington Easement is located on Lot 2 and is depicted as "Proposed 30' Wide Pedestrian Easement and Vehicular Access Easement to the City of South Burlington Along Westerly Boundary of Lot 2 in Same Location as the Existing Utility Easement" on a plan entitled: "Lands of Barry Mossman, Trustee of the Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc., Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, 25 Green Mountain Dr., South Burlington, VT, Boundary Line Adjustment Plat," Sheet PL1, prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson dated October 6, 2014, last revised July 20, 2015. (the `Boundary Adjustment Plan"), being a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Barry Mossman, Trustee of The Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. Money gravel & Shea ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of South Burlington September 22, 2015 Page 4 Purchase Pension Plan and Trust by Warranty Deed of IDX System Corporation dated November 29, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 225 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, The Property was originally depicted as Lot 17 on a plan entitled: "National Life Insurance Co., Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc. Consulting Engineers dated June 12, 1973 and recorded in Map Volume 105 at Page 21, (Map Slide 101, Page 3 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "1973 Subdivision Plan"), which was subsequently subdivided into two lots as depicted on a plan entitled: "Green Mountain Power Corporation Corporate Headquarters Building, South Burlington, Vermont, Location Plan," prepared by Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw and Foley dated March 22, 1983, last revised July 10, 1984 and recorded in Map Volume 197 at Page 22 (Map Slide 168, Page 5) of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "GMPC Plan"). Reference is further made to a plat entitled: "ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey, IDX Systems Corporation d/b/a GE Healthcare, 25 & 27 Green Mountain Dr., South Burlington, Vt.," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers dated March 26, 2008, last revised November 15, 2010 and recorded in Map Slide 549 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "ALTA/ACSM Plat"). Encumbrances Disclosed by the Land Records. The City of South Burlington Easement is not subject to encumbrances or liens of record in the Land Records during the Period of the Search (as defined below), except as follows: (a) Mortgage Deed from The Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. Money Purchase Plan and Trust to People's United Bank dated November 30, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 230 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (b) Assignment of Rents from The Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. Money Purchase Plan and Trust to People's United Bank dated November 30, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 242 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (c) Addendum to Loan Agreement between Barry Mossman, Trustee of The Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. Money Purchase Plan and Trust to People's United Bank dated November 30, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 251 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (d) Utility easement granted by National Life Insurance Company to Green Mountain Power Corporation by Deed dated April 8, 1974 and recorded in Volume 109 at Page 518 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. gravel & shea ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of South Burlington September 22, 2015 Page 5 (e) Utility easement thirty feet (30') in width as set forth in the Warranty Deed of National Life Insurance Company to GMP Real Estate Corporation dated August 25, 1975 and recorded in Volume 126 at Page 10 of the City of South Burlington Land Records and in the Warranty Deed of National Life Insurance Company to the City of South Burlington dated January 6, 1976 and recorded in Volume 126 at Page 292 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is made to the Warranty Deed of National Life Insurance Company to the City of South Burlington by Warranty Deed dated August 3, 1982 and recorded in Volume 180 at Page 488 of the City of South Burlington. (f) Notice to the City of South Burlington Land Records by GE Healthcare dated October 28, 2010 regarding Waste Management Division, SMS Site #2010-4062 recorded in Volume 969 at Page 20 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (g) As we are unable to determine the location of the following easements/rights, we note the City of South Burlington Easement may be subject to: (i) Spring rights described in a deed of Fortis H. Abbot and Sadie M. Abbot to Vermont Agricultural College dated January 30, 1952 and recorded in Volume 30 at Page 286 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, as modified by an agreement recorded in Volume 22 at Page 393 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (ii) Easements and rights set forth in the Warranty Deed of Dominion Realty Corporation to National Life Insurance Company dated December 27, 1952 and recorded in Volume 30 at Page 497 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (iii) Utility easement granted by National Life Insurance Company to Green Mountain Power Corporation by Deed dated September 21, 1961 and recorded in Volume 63 at Page 90 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (h) Rights of the public and others legally entitled thereto in any portion of the Property lying within the boundaries of a public road, way, street or alley. (i) State and municipal permits and/or approvals set forth below in Paragraph 4 Encumbrances Disclosed by the Land Records. The Property is not subject to encumbrances or liens of record in the Land Records during the Period of the Search (as defined below), except as follows: (a) All matters set forth above in Paragraph 2, above. gravel & rhea ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of South Burlington September 22, 2015 Page 6 (b) Easement for roads conveyed by National Life Insurance Company to the City of South Burlington by Warranty Deed dated January 6, 1976 and recorded in Volume 126 at Page 289 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (c) Pedestrian and non -motorized easement ten feet (10') in width granted by GMP Real Estate Corporation to the City of South Burlington by Warranty Deed dated August 23, 1983 and recorded in Volume 199 at Page 144 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (located on Lots 1 and 2). (d) Pedestrian and non -motorized easement fifteen feet (15') in width granted by GMP Real Estate Corporation to the City of South Burlington by Warranty Deed dated October 27, 1982 and recorded in Volume 211 at Page 247 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (located on Lots 1 and 2). (e) Notification of Underground Storage Tank filed by Green Mountain Power Corporation dated April 1, 1986 and recorded in Volume 215 at Page 192 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (installation of one tank), as amended by Underground Storage Tank form dated January 18, 1994 and recorded in Volume 363 at Page 653 of the City of South Burlington (for the replacement of the tank), as amended by Underground Storage Tank form (for change of ownership to IDX Systems Corporation) dated September 21, 1999 and recorded in Volume 464 at Page 36 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, and by Underground Storage Tank Closure Form dated January 25, 2010 and recorded in Volume 917 at Page 272 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (f) Utility easement granted by IDX Systems Corporation to Green Mountain Power Corporation by Deed dated December 29, 2000 and recorded in Volume 490 at Page 684 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (g) Utility easement granted by IDX Systems Corporation to Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. by Deed of Easement for Pipelines dated October 20, 1999 and recorded in Volume 465 at Page 538 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (Lot 2). (h) Lease Agreement by and between IDX Systems Corporation and Allseripts, LLC dated November 30, 2006, as amended by First Amendment to Lease dated January 31, 2010. 4. Permit Matters. (a) Municipal Zoning Matters. The Property is subject to and benefitted by the terms and conditions of the following: (i) The Planning Commission approved the 1973 Subdivision Plan (referenced above, which depicts an 18 lot subdivision with the Property being Lot 17 thereof) on January 24, 1973, which plan was recorded on gravel & s he a ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of South Burlington September 22, 2015 Page 7 June 15, 1973 in Plat Volume 105 at Page 21 (Map Slide 101, Page 3) of the City of South Burlington Land Records. According to 24 V.S.A § 4416, the approval of a plan by the planning commission shall expire unless within ninety (90) days of the approval the plat shall have been duly filed or recorded in the office of the clerk of the municipality. As the Subdivision Plan was not recorded within 90 days of the approval date, the approval lapsed. However, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission reaffirmed the Plan by Notice of Recording dated March 12, 1998 and recorded in Volume 424 at Pages 67-68 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (e.g., indicating that the 1973 Subdivision Plan recorded in Map Volume 105 at Page 21 shall be deemed to have been stamped and endorsed as required and in satisfaction of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations). (ii) The Planning Commission approved on February 14, 1984 the subdivision of Lot 17 into a 9.34 acre parcel with the improvements thereon and a 3.8 acre vacant parcel with a condition that a 24' right of way must be reserved for the benefit of the vacant parcel at the time of sale of the 9.34 acre parcel. The GMPC Plan, was recorded on February 24, 1984, within the 90 day time frame then required for recording a Plat under 24 V.S.A. §4416. (iii) The Development Review Board approved Final Plat Application No. SD-15-18 by Findings of Fact and Decision dated August 20, 2015 for the planned unit development on the Property, comprising the resubdivision of Lot 2 to increase its size to 10.12 acres and decreasing Lot 1 to 3.13 acres and the development of Lot 1 with a four story 65 unit multi -family dwelling, with shared parking of a total of 288 spaces. (b) State Subdivision Matters/Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Matters/Public Building Regulations. The Property is subject to and benefitted by the terms and conditions of the following: (i) Certification of Compliance Permit No. 4CO094-2 dated October 13, 1982 authorized the exterior sewer/water and foundation plumbing for a 52,210 square foot, three story building for Green Mountain Power Corporation headquarters with municipal water and sewer. (ii) Certification of Compliance Permit No. 4C0094-2A dated November 29, 1982 authorized the construction of the 52,210 square foot building. By letter dated March 16, 1999 from Ernest Christianson, he confirmed that total occupancy was approved for 174 employees. (iii) State of Vermont Subdivision Permit No. 4C0094-2C dated February 25, 1999 and recorded in Volume 449 at Page 235 of the City of South gravel & shea ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of South Burlington September 22, 2015 Page 8 Burlington Land Records which authorized the subdivision of Lot 17 into a 9.4 acre parcel with building and related infrastructure thereon. (iv) State of Vermont Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit Amendment No. WW-4-1320-1 dated September 11, 2015 and recorded in Volume 1289 at Page 107 of the City of South Burlington Land Records approved the boundary line adjustment between Lots 1 and 2, Lot 1 being 3.13 acres and Lot 2 being 10.12 acres, the construction of water and wastewater infrastructure and service lines, and the construction of the 65 multi -unit building with 37 one bedroom units and 28 two bedroom units on Lot 1. (c) Act 250 Jurisdiction Matters. The Property is subject to and benefitted by the terms and conditions of the following: (i) State of Vermont Land Use Permit No. 4CO094 dated March 30, 1973, as amended on July 29, 1975, authorized an 18 lot subdivision for commercial and residential lots. (ii) State of Vermont Land Use Permit Amendment No. 4CO094-1 dated October 30, 1978 authorized the extension of the subdivision and sale of the 18 lot subdivision. (iii) State of Vermont Land Use Permit Amendment No. 4CO084-2 dated October 13, 1982 and recorded in Volume 186 at Page 5 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (revised to reflect correct No. 4CO094-2 by Memorandum dated December 2, 1982) authorized the site and foundation work for construction of a 51,200 square foot, three story building with related roadways, parking and municipal water and sewer on the Property. (iv) State of Vermont Land Use Permit Amendment No. 4C0094-2A dated December 10, 1982 and recorded in Volume 186 at Page 189 of the City of South Burlington Land Records authorized the construction of the 51,200 square foot building and incorporated the terms and conditions of Certification of Compliance No. 4C0094-2A. (v) State of Vermont Land Use Permit Amendment No. 4C0094-2B dated March 16, 1983 and recorded in Volume 186 at Page 451 of the City of South Burlington Land Records authorized four separate treatments of exterior lighting. (vi) State of Vermont Land Use Permit Amendment No. 4C0094-2C dated May 31, 1984 and recorded in Volume 201 at Page 403 of the City of gravel &, shea ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of South Burlington September 22, 2015 Page 9 South Burlington Land Records authorized the subdivision of the Property into two lots as depicted on the GMPC Plan. (vii) State of Vermont Land Use Permit Amendment No. 4C0094-2D dated November 18, 1988 and recorded in Volume 272 at Page 340 of the City of South Burlington Land Records authorized the expansion of the existing parking lot on Deferred Parcel by 61 spaces. (viii) An application for State of Vermont Land Use Permit Amendment No. 4C0094-2F has been submitted for the approval of the subdivision depicted on the Boundary Adjustment Plan and the proposed improvements on Lot 1. DISCLAIMER: Except to the extent specifically identified above, the undersigned has not undertaken any investigation whatsoever with respect to whether the Property and each component thereof as originally constructed or subsequently modified, with or without permits, was in compliance with or continues to be in compliance with the provisions of the permits identified above or the applicable laws, rules, and regulations, ordinance and orders. The permits identified above include numerous findings of fact, conclusions of law, exhibits, plans and other documents related to and referenced in the permits and the permits contain technical requirements to be satisfied prior to, during and after construction, many of such matters can only be determined by a physical inspection of the Property. The undersigned did not conduct such a physical inspection, nor is such inspection part of the title examiner's obligation. A full review of all those matters requires knowledge and skills in engineering, architecture and other professions outside of the legal profession. The undersigned states no opinion and makes no report or certification with respect to such matters. If you require additional information regarding the permits, or the status of the Property regarding compliance with the permits, you should contact the undersigned or your own counsel to discuss additional procedures and investigations which may be available at extra cost. Other Matters. In addition, we direct your attention to the following: Taxes for the year July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016 in the total amount of $88,023.63 are due in three installments on August 18, 2015, November 16, 2015 and March 15, 2016. The first installment has been paid. There are no delinquent taxes of record. Our examination of the Land Records covered the period from December 27, 1952 through September 22, 2015 at 8:00 in the forenoon (the "Period of the Search"). In preparing this Report, we have not examined or inquired into nor do we state any opinion or make any certification regarding the following, except to the extent specifically addressed above: Taxes or assessments against the Property, if any, currently or hereafter assessed (none of which are delinquent on the date hereof, unless noted above). gravel & shea ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of South Burlington September 22, 2015 Page 10 Any instrument recorded prior or subsequent to the period of examination specified in this Report. The application or effect of any laws, ordinances, bylaws, rules, regulations or plans of the United States, the State of Vermont or any subdivisions, agencies or departments thereof relating to zoning or environmental matters; or whether the Property contains or is located within an area designated as a federal flood hazard zone, a wetland, or public waters. Matters which would be disclosed by a physical examination, environmental audit, or an accurate survey of the Property, including in particular public highway easements, easements appurtenant to adjacent lands arising from any subdivision of lands without provision for adequate access thereto, the availability or adequacy of public or private utilities and services or the description or physical location of the boundaries of the Property. Rights of tenants and others in possession of all or any portion of the Property. Any untrue, inaccurate or misleading statements contained or referred to in any recorded documents or public records. Matters contained in records of probates, bankruptcy or other courts; the records of births, marriages, divorces or deaths; or the records of the formation, existence, registration or status of any entity which is a party to any document affecting the title to the Property. The status of lease land rents. Rights claimed in lands and premises forming the alleged homelands of certain American Indian or indian tribes and nations including, but not limited to the Abenaki Indian Nation arising out of aboriginal rights. The Property may be part of the lands claimed. Claims have been made to certain lands and premises in northern and western Vermont, but the rights of the claimants have not been finally adjudicated. 10. The effect of any activities which could or might result in forfeiture of a right, title and interest in the premises to the United States of America for any violation under the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention Control Act of 1970, as amended, or to any other party pursuant to bankruptcy, insolvency, or fraudulent conveyances or similar laws. 11. The potential application of the Vermont Land Use and Development Law (10 V.S.A. Ch. 151) and the Environmental Protection Rules to the Property by reason of activity constituting a "development," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3), or a "subdivision," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(19), by any "person," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(14), resulting in: (a) the creation of ten or more lots within any continuous period of five years by a person other than the specifically gravel & rhea ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of South Burlington September 22, 2015 Page 11 identified persons appearing in the chain of title to the Property; (b) the creation of lots by any person identified in the chain of title which are located in any town other than the town where the Property is located; or (c) any other basis for a claim of jurisdiction by the Environmental Board based on the activities of any person other than a person specifically named in the chain of title to the Property. 12. The contents of or effect of records which existed at the time of our inquiry directed to the governmental officials named above which were not filed in the official file kept by such government officials regarding the Property at the time of our inquiry. This Report is solely for your benefit, is not transferable, and is not for the use or benefit of any other person or entity, nor for use in connection with any transaction other than that described above. Very truly yours, GRAVEL & SHEA PC Michelle N. Farkas Exhibit "A" Being all and the same non-exclusive easement and right of way for pedestrian and vehicular access (the "Easement") conveyed by Easement Deed of Barry Mossman, Trustee of the Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust to the City of South Burlington dated , 2015 and to be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records, and more particularly described therein, in part, as follows: Being a thirty-foot (30') wide non-exclusive easement for the construction, operation, use, maintenance, repair and replacement of a pedestrian and vehicular access depicted as "Proposed 30' Wide Pedestrian Easement and Vehicular Access Easement to the City of South Burlington Along Westerly Boundary of Lot 2 in Same Location as the Existing Utility Easement" on a plat entitled: "Lands of Barry Mossman, Trustee of the Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc., Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, 25 Green Mountain Dr., South Burlington, VT, Boundary Line Adjustment Plat," Sheet PL1, prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 6, 2014, last revised July 20, 2015 and recorded in Map Slide of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). By its recording of this Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantor lying outside the scope of this easement and right of way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hereunder, shall be restored as near as reasonably practical to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold Grantor and its successors and assigns harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right of way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this Deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor and its successors and assigns shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of so much of its property as is encumbered hereby, such as shall not be inconsistent with Grantee's use of said easement and right of way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement and right-of-way which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to use said easement and right of way. The Easement is a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Grantor by Warranty Deed of IDX System Corporation dated November 29, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 225 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans and deeds and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. -1051145v 1/MNF+ i C-L"" Fci ;;7 � NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL WHEREAS, on August 20, 2015, Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc., Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust (the "Owner') and The Snyder Construction Company, LLC (the ""A plp icant') obtained approval from the South Burlington Development Review Board (the "Board") of final plat application #SD-15-18 for a planned unit development on two (2) parcels totaling 13.25 acres, more or less, with Lot 1 to be developed with a four story 65-unit multi -family dwelling and Lot 2 with an existing 48,578 square foot office building, as shown on a plat entitled: "Lands of Barry Mossman, Trustee of the Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc., Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, 25 Green Mountain Dr., South Burlington, VT, Boundary Line Adjustment Plat," Sheet PLl, prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Coli sulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 6, 2014, last revised July 20, 2015 and recorded in Map Slide ZQf the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat'')_ The above referenced parcels are hereaftelreferred to collectively as the "Pro e ", and each individual lot is referred to as a "Lot". WHEREAS, the Property is owned by Owner and is all and the same lands and premises conveyed to Owner by Warranty Deed of IDX System Corporation dated November 29, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 225 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. WHEREAS, the Board's approval imposes certain conditions on the Property; NOW THEREFORE, Owner and Applicant hereby give notice that the Property is subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon the Property unless or until modified or removed by the Board or its successor: 1. The Property shall be developed and used in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Board's approval of final plat application 4SD-15-18 granted on August 20, 2015, and the Plat. 2. For the purposes of planning and zoning compliance with the City of South Burlington ordinances and regulations now in effect or hereafter amended or adopted, including zoning and subdivision regulations, the two (2) Lots depicted on the Plat shall be considered one (1) single, 13.25- acre, more or less, lot of land for planning and zoning purposes (i.e., for coverage and dimensional requirements), even if the Lots and/or the buildings constructed thereon are conveyed to separate owners. 3. Nothing in this notice or the conditions or covenants contained herein shall be construed to prevent the conveyance, lease, assignment, mortgage, or other transfer of any interest in or to any one of the Lots as separate and apart from the other Lots, provided that the Owner or his heirs and assigns seeks Board approval for any subsequent subdivision of the Lots pursuant to the Land Development Regulations, if applicable. 4. The proper party for purposes of submitting applications for approval from time to time under City ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, shall be the Owner, or in the event of a sale of the Lots, the then owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 or their duly authorized representatives. The City shall act upon any applications submitted by all of the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2, or their duly authorized representatives, and shall not be required to resolve a dispute between the owners as to the respective rights of the owners. It shall be the duty of the owners to provide written notice of any such applications to all others having an interest in the Property that may be affected by the application proceedings of the commencement of such proceedings. 337 5. Any action to enforce any City ordinance or regulation, including zoning or subdivision regulations, against the Property or activities or events occurring on the Property shall be brought against the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 or their duly authorized representatives. It shall be the duty of the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2, or their duly authorized representatives, to provide written notice to all others having an interest in the Property that may be affected by the enforcement proceedings of the commencement of such proceedings. Any decision in an enforcement proceeding, including a decision granting injunctive relief or penalties, shall be enforceable at the City's sole discretion against the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2. 6. Any changes to the Plat shall require approval of the Board. 7. This Notice of Conditions shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the Property or an interest in the Property. 8. This Notice of Conditions shall be binding upon the Owner and the Owner's successors and assigns, including the Applicant. Dated at v. A ' --Vermont, this \$, day of '0 e 2015. STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST By: Ba oss Trustee STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. On this 14 - day of �.1! wV)Er 1 2015 personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of BARRY MOSSMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE STO HENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and, he acknowledged this instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and'dced of':: THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION; PLAN AND TRUST. Before me, G Notary Public Print name:ya L2- Notary commission issued in Chittenden County My commission expires: 2/10/19 -2- - //- , " 4 l� �1 tness STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. THE SNYDER CONSTRUCTION COMP , LLC By: Au on Agent On this day of '��7 2015, personally appeared �� 1r� 5 p kC� . Sri�j c Duly Authorized Agent of THE SNYDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he acknowledged this instrument by him signed and sealed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of THE SNYDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC. i7 <l05346MAUM> Before Public Notary Commission issued in Chittenden County My commission expires: 2/10/15 -3- L4I} KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BARRY MOSSMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST, with a principal office in Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont ("Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to it paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont ("Grantee'), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY, AND CONFIRM unto Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for a pedestrian and vehicular access for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Easement') described as follows, viz: Being a thirty-foot (30') wide non-exclusive easement for the construction, operation, use, maintenance, repair and replacement of a pedestrian and vehicular access depicted as "Proposed 30' Wide Pedestrian Easement and Vehicular Access Easement to the City of South Burlington Along Westerly Boundary of Lot 2 in Same Location as the Existing Utility Easement" on a plat entitled: "Lands of Barry Mossman, Trustee of the Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc., Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, 25 Green Mountain Dr., South Burlington, VT, Boundary Line Adjustment Plat," Sheet PL1, prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 6, 2014, last revised July 20, 2015 and recorded in Map Slide of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). By its recording of this Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantor lying outside the scope of this easement and right of way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hereunder, shall be restored as near as reasonably practical to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold Grantor and its successors and assigns harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right of way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this Deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor and its successors and assigns shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of so much of its property as is encumbered hereby, such as shall not be inconsistent with Grantee's use of said easement and right of way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement and right-of-way which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to use said easement and right of way. The Easement is a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Grantor by Warranty Deed of IDX System Corporation dated November 29, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 225 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Easement is also subject to: (a) City of South Burlington Development Review Board Findings of Fact and Decision on Final Plat Application #SD-15-18 dated August 20, 2015; (b) State of Vermont Certification of Compliance #4C0094-2, dated October 13, 1982, as amended by Certification of Compliance #4C0094-2A, dated November 29, 1982; (c) State of Vermont Land Use Permit #4C0094-1, dated October 30, 1978, as amended by #4C0094-2, dated October 13, 1982 and recorded in Volume 186 at Page 5 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, #4C0094-2A, dated December 10, 1982, recorded in Volume 186 at Page 189 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, #4C0094-2B, dated March 16, 1983 and recorded in Volume 186 at Page 451 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, #4C0094-2C, dated May 31, 1984 ;_3 i=i 3 137376 V : 1293 F'G e 341 and recorded in Volume 201 at Page 343 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, and #4C0094-2D, dated November 18, 1988 and recorded in Volume 272 at Page 340 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; (d) State of Vermont Subdivision Permit #4C0094-2C, dated February 25, 1999 and recorded in Volume 449 at Page 237 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and (e) all easements and rights of way of record, not meaning to reinstate any claims barred by operation of the Vermont Marketable Record Title Act, 27 V.S.A. § 601-611, both inclusive. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans and deeds and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said granted Easement, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereto, to the Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; and Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with Grantee, and its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, Grantor is the sole owner of the Easement, and has good right and title to convey the same in the manner aforesaid, that the said Easement are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE, except as aforementioned; and it hereby engages to WARRANT and DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforementioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BARRY MOSSMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST, has set its hand and seal by its Duly Authorized Agent this �'L day of 0 C , 2015. STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST By: 4��_ Barry o man, Tl ustee STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. On this 1 cam. � day of ab� 2015 personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of BARRY MOSSMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE STON19HENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN . AND TRUST, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and fie acknowledged this instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST. f ;_TUF.hi RECT-TAX HID 80A€D OF HEALTH t: ER I . fits V T LAK! `s)c f, n VtL�F F`LAHS At CEF'T. F.EC: is %fin''+'lilp C: i Cl:?Fl; rye Oct. 2 j i -015 <1004576v3R0P> Before me, VO I JtA Y_ Notary Public Print name: Wau NJ 1 Notary commission issued in Chittenden County My commission expires: 2/10/19 -2- x i F-1 03737B ) e 1293 PG 342 PARTIAL DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that PEOPLE'S UNITED BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Mortgagee"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby release and discharge the following described easement from: (1) the Mortgage Deed from THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PLAN AND TRUST to PEOPLE'S UNITED BANK, dated November 30, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 230 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and (2) the Assignment of Rents from THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PLAN AND TRUST to PEOPLE'S UNITED BANK dated November 30, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 242 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (collectively, the "Financing Documents"), to wit: Being all and the same easement conveyed by Easement Deed from Barry Mossman, Trustee of the Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust to the City of South Burlington dated of or about even date herewith and to be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records, and being more particularly described therein as follows: Being a thirty-foot (30') wide non-exclusive easement for the construction, operation, use, maintenance, repair and replacement of a pedestrian and vehicular access depicted as "Proposed 30' Wide Pedestrian Easement and Vehicular Access Easement to the City of South Burlington Along Westerly Boundary of Lot 2 in Same Location as the Existing Utility Easement" on a plat entitled: "Lands of Barry Mossman, Trustee of the Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc., Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, 25 Green Mountain Dr., South Burlington, VT, Boundary Line Adjustment Plat," Sheet PL 1, prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 6, 2014, last revised July 20, 2015 and recorded in Map Slide _ of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). By its recording of this Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantor lying outside the scope of this easement and right of way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hereunder, shall be restored as near as reasonably practical to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold Grantor and its successors and assigns harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right of way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this Deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor and its successors and assigns shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of so much of its property as is encumbered hereby, such as shall not be inconsistent with Grantee's use of said easement and right of way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement and right-of-way which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to use said easement and right of way. The Easement is a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Grantor by Warranty Deed of IDX System Corporation dated November 29, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 225 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. JUG . ; 113`.0 _cuq:i R_x, ..: 000- 3737u )V - 12?3 F'G - ,343 Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. Mortgagee intends to release, remise and quitclaim only the above -described property from the operation of the Financing Documents. In all other respects, the Financing Documents shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PEOPLE'S UNITED BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as evidenced ,by the signature of its Duly Authorized Agent, does hereby execute this document this�� day ofLt r - 2015. PEOPLE'S UNITED BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION B E cLc y Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. On s day of �'J'L- 2015, personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of PEOPLE'S UNITED BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, to' me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he/she acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of PEOPLE'S UNITED BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. Before me,�\��� Notary Public Printed Name: L & -n 0 L '\ . -0 ' C) �tiw Notary commission issued in Chittenden County My commission expires: 2/10/19 <1033686AMP> -2_ �e:a STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION Certificate of Director and Incumbency Certificate The undersigned certifies that he is a Director of STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a Vermont corporation (the "Corporation'), and that he is authorized to execute this Certificate by and on behalf of the Corporation, and further certifies that: The following is a true, correct and complete copy of a resolution duly adopted by Consent of Directors, and that the same has not been amended or revoked and is in full force and effect at the date hereof. - RESOLVED: That the Corporation, as Administrator of Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust ("Plan"), enter into all documents required for the Plan to convey a pedestrian and vehicular access easement to the City of South Burlington (the "Conveyance') described as the following: Being a thirty-foot (30') wide non-exclusive easement for the construction, operation, use, maintenance, repair and replacement of a pedestrian and vehicular access depicted as "Proposed 30' Wide Pedestrian Easement and Vehicular Access Easement to the City of South Burlington Along Westerly Boundary of Lot 2 in Same Location as the Existing Utility Easement" on a plat entitled.- "Lands of Barry Mossman, Trustee of the Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc., Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, 25 Green Mountain Dr., South Burlington, VT, Boundary Line Adjustment Plat," Sheet PL1, prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 6, 2014, last revised July 20, 2015 and recorded in Map Slide _ of the City of South Burlington Land Records. RESOLVED: That Barry Mossman be, and hereby is, authorized and directed in the name and on behalf of the Corporation from time to time (i) to take such actions and to execute and deliver all documents and such certificates, deeds, agreements, instruments, and notices as may be required or as any such officer may deem necessary, advisable or proper in order to carry out and perform the obligations of the Corporation pursuant to the Conveyance; and (ii) to take and to cause the Corporation to take any and all other actions, all of the foregoing as to and to the extent that such officer may deem necessary or desirable, to carry out fully the transactions contemplated by these resolutions and the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein, and the taking of any such action or the execution and delivery of such agreements and documents shall be conclusive evidence of the authorization thereof, all such actions to be performed in such manner, and all such certificates, instruments, notices and documents to be executed and delivered in such form as the officer executing the same shall approve, the performance or execution thereof by such officer to be conclusive evidence of the approval thereof by the Corporation. ,- -�= - 1= c li=ai=e37,379 )fie': �?93 PG 345- 2. The copy of the Bylaws of the Corporation attached hereto is a true, complete and correct copy of the Bylaws duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, which Bylaws are in full force and effect as of the date hereof. 3. The copy of the Articles of Association of the Corporation attached hereto is a true, correct and complete copy of such Articles as in effect on the date hereof. 4. That the following named individual is a duly elected, qualified and acting officer of the Company occupying the offices set forth opposite their names, and the signature of such officer set forth opposite his name is his genuine signature: Name Title atu Barry Mossman President/Director IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the corporate seal of the Corporation, this \"> day of 0 C' 2015. ,\ v Barry Mossman, Pre kdent and Director 4005163vWOP> _2- t�4 yr� 1 f 7 i i y V m 1-293 PG-- 346. CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION I, Barry J. Mossman, President and Duly Authorized Agent, of Stonehenge Investment Corporation, hereby certify that the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Stonehenge Investment Corporation, as set forth in the Certificate of Continuation filed herewith, have been duly adopted in accordance with Title 13, Section 222 of the Virgin Islands Code. In Witness Whereof, I have signed this Certificate of Amendment and Restatement of the Articles of Incorporation of Stonehenge Investment Corporation this 21" day of September, 2012. Signed: Attest: Brooke T. Mossman, Vice President STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Barry J. oss resident & Duly Authorized Agent At Burlington, in said county and state, this 21 q day of September, 2012 personally appeared Barry J. Mossman, President and Duly Authorized Agent of Stonehenge Investment Corporation, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Stonehenge Investment Corporation and certifies that the statements contained in this Certificate of Amendment and Restatement are true. Before me, VOW La� Notary Public Ir"Ccnor ded in ,{0_ N. i ;'7 :lark , "fir.♦ 5 4y .Ir'a,;. ° :r q rt w{4-� I 037 -183 V e 1293 PG: 3=l. CERTIFICATE OF CONTINUATION of STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION The undersigned, being the President and Duly Authorized Agent of Stonehenge Investment Corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby files this Certificate of Continuation in accordance with the provisions of Title 13, Section 471 of the United States Virgin Islands Code. 1. Stonehenge Investment Corporation was first formed November 12, 1980 in the United States in the State of Vermont. 2. The name of the corporation immediately prior to the filing of this Certificate of Continuation was Stonehenge Investment Corporation. 3. The jurisdiction constituting the principal place of business of the corporation immediately prior to filing of this Certificate of Continuation is the State of Vermont. 4. Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as necessary to meet the provisions of Title 13 Section 2 of the United States Virgin Islands Code as of the date of the Corporation's continuance in the United States Virgin Islands are as follows: Amended and Restated ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION Article I: The name of the corporation is Stonehenge Investment Corporation (hereinafter referred to at the "Corporation"). Article H: The principal office of the Corporation in the U.S. Virgin Islands is located at 6012 Estate Nazareth, St. Thomas, USVI 00802. The name of the resident agent of the Corporation is Barry J. Mossman, whose mailing and physical address is also 6012 Estate Nazareth, St. Thomas, USVI 00802. Article III: Without limiting in any manner the scope and generality of the allowable functions of the Corporation, it is hereby provided that the Corporation shall have the following purposes, objects and powers to (i) acquire, own, invest in, develop, construct, lease from others, lease to others (including pursuant to time sharing arrangements), operate for itself and third parties, deal with and sell and otherwise dispose of real property and other assets used or useful for or related to the foregoing; (ii) to engage in any other lawful business or activity in the U.S. Virgin Islands, whether or not related to matters referred to in clause (i) above; (iii) to enter into and carry out contracts for or in relation to the foregoing business and activities with any person, firm, association, corporation, government or governmental agency; (iv) to conduct its business within and/ Pagel of 3 or outside the U. S. Virgin Islands and to have offices within and/ or outside the U.S. Virgin Islands, (v) to borrow or raise money to an amount permitted by law by the sale or issuance of obligations of any kind, to guarantee loans, other types of indebtedness and financing obligations, and to secure the foregoing by mortgages or other liens upon any and all of the property of every kind of the Corporation; and (vi) to do all and everything necessary, suitable and proper for the accomplishment of any of the purposes or the attainment of any of the objects or the exercise of any of the powers herein set forth, either alone or in connection with other firms, individuals, associations or corporations in the U.S. Virgin Islands and elsewhere in the United States and foreign countries, and to do any other acts or things incidental or appurtenant to or growing out of or connected with said business, purposes, objectives and powers of any part thereof not inconsistent with the laws of the U.S. Virgin Islands, and to exercise any and all powers now or hereafter conferred by law on business corporation whether expressly enumerated herein or not. The purposes, objectives and powers specified in this Article III shall not be limited or restricted by reference to the terms of any other subdivision or of any other article of these Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. Article ]IV: The total number of shares of all classes of stock the Corporation is authorized to issue is Fifty (50) shares of common stock at Ten Dollars ($10) par value; no preferred stock authorized. Article V: The Corporation is to have perpetual existence. Article VI: The number of directors of the Corporation shall be fixed by, or in the manner provided in the by-laws, but in no case shall the number be fewer than three (3). The directors need not be stockholders and election of directors need not be by ballot. Upon filing of this Certificate of Continuation, the Corporation shall be continued in the United States Virgin Islands, and its domicile, seat, or principal place of business shall be considered to be in the United States Virgin Islands as set forth in this Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, and the Corporation thereafter shall be subject to the General Corporation Law of the United States Virgin Islands (Chapter 1, Title 13, United States Virgin Islands Code). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned person has duly executed this Certificate of Continuation this 2 1 " day, of September, 2012. Signed: _AL*k%W�� Barry .4Ros§MW President & Duly Authorized Agent Page 2 of 3 STATE OF VERMONT CBTTTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said county and state, this 21 " day of September, 2012 personally appeared Barry J. Mossman, President and Duly Authorized Agent of Stonehenge Investment Corporation, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Stonehenge Investment Corporation and certifies that the statements contained in this Certificate of Continuation are true. , / i , Before me, V ( AA 1'AI4()UL /- Notary Public Page 3 of 3 a1121111411 11:' , ,Y,. ._ 4e"`�VERMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency of Natural Resources Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED io V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective December 1, 2010 Landowner(s): Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. Permit Number: WW-4-1320-1 c/o Barry Mossman PIN: One Lawson Lane Burlington VT 05401 This permit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: 0720-00027 referenced in a deed recorded in Book 976 Page(s) 225 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of the proposed construction of proposed sixty five unit residential building with thirty-seven (one bedroom) units and twenty eight (two bedroom) units on Lot #1 and a boundary adjustment between Lots #1 and #2 with Lot #1 being 3.13 acres and Lot #2 being 10.12 acres, construction of water and wastewater infrastructure and service lines, served by municipal water supply services and municipal wastewater disposal services located on 27 Green Mountain Drive in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. i.GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans and/or documents prepared by Andrew Rowe, P.E. of Lamoureux & Dickinson, with the stamped plans listed as follows: Sheet Number Title Plan Date Plan Revision Date 2 Utility Plan 11/01/2014 7/20/2015 6 Details & Specifications -Water & Sewer 11/01/2014 7/01/2015 7 Details & Specifications -Site & Stormwater 11/01/2014 8/14/2015 9 Sewer Service Profile 11/01/2014 3/27/2015 10 Water Service Profile 11/01/2014 6/24/2015 PLi Boundary Line Adjustment Plat 1o/o6/2014 3/27/2015 1.2 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits PRIOR to construction including, but not limited to, those that may be required from the Act 25o District Environmental Commission; the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division; the Watershed Management Division; the Division of Fire Safety; the Vermont Department of Health; the Family Services Division; other State departments; or local officials. 1.3 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall record and index this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 1.4 The landowner shall record and index all required installation certifications and other documents that are required to be filed under these Rules or under a specific permit condition in the South Burlington Land Records and ensure that copies of all certifications are sent to the Secretary. 1.5 No permit issued by the Secretary shall be valid for a substantially completed potable water supply and wastewater system until the Secretary receives a signed and dated certification from a Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) that states: v� Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury No Text Wastewater System and Potable Water Sur Permit WW-4-1320-1 r Page 2 of 3 "7 hereby certify that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply and wastewater system were installed in accordance with the permitted design and all the permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfully met those performance tests", or which otherwise satisfies the requirements of §1-3o8 and §1-9i1 of the referenced rules. 1.6 All conditions set forth in Permit Number WW-4-1320-1 shall remain in effect except as amended or modified herein. 1.7 This project is approved for the construction of a 65 unit residential building on Lot 1. Construction of additional nonexempt buildings, including commercial and residential buildings, is not allowed without prior review and approval by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. No construction is allowed that will cause non-compliance with an existing permit. 1.8 Each purchaser of any portion of the project shall be shown a copy of the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit and the stamped plan(s), if applicable, prior to conveyance of any portion of the project to that purchaser. 1.9 By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations, and permit conditions. 1.10 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with io V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2.WATER SUPPLY 2.1 The components of the potable water supply herein approved shall be routinely and reliably inspected during construction by a Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) who shall, upon completion and prior to occupancy of the associated building, report in writing to the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division that the installation was accomplished in accordance with the referenced plans and permit conditions, as specifically directed in Condition # 1.5 herein. 2.2 The project is approved for connection to the water supply system owned by the City of South Burlington (VTo005091) as depicted on the plan(s) stamped by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division. The project is approved for a maximum of 12,555 gallons of water per day. 2.3 This project is approved for connection to a public water system. The installation of the public water system shall be completed in accordance with the conditions of the Public Water System Permit to Construct PID# C-3238- 15.0 WSID #VToo05O9i dated July 9, 2015 or any subsequent approvals for this system issued by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division. 2.4 The landowner shall install and maintain backflow prevention devices that conform to Vermont Department of Public Safety standards and NFPA 13 for any connection of a sprinkler fire suppression system to a public drinking water system. 2.5 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their water distribution system. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. 3.WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 3.1 The components of the sanitary wastewater system herein approved shall be routinely and reliably inspected during construction by a Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) who shall, upon completion and prior to occupancy of the associated building, report in writing to the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division that the installation was accomplished in accordance with the referenced plans and permit conditions, as specifically directed in Condition #1.5 herein. 3.2 This project is approved for connection to the City of South Burlington wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the plan(s) stamped by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division. The project is approved for a maximum of 11,o6o gallons of wastewater per day. Wastewater System and Potable Water Su- Permit ` WW-4-1320-1 j Page 3 Of 3.3 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required if the project is served by the municipal wastewater collection system. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. Alyssa B. Schuren, Commissioner Department of Environmental ental Conservation BY�9�/ ✓ ��' Dated September ii, 2015 Jess�yman, Region Engineer Essex Regional Office Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division cc South Burlington Planning Commission Andrew Rowe/Lamoureux & Dickinson Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division Act 25o District Environmental Commission-4Co094 Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety PLANNING & ZONING August 20, 2015 Andrew Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 Re: Final Plat Approval #SD-15-18 — 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Dear Mr. Rowe: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board on the above referenced project, the hearing for which was closed on July 21, 2015 (effective 08/20/15). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the final plat plans must be recorded in the land records (in mylar format) within 180 days (must be submitted to me in time for recording along with a $15 recording fee by February 16, 2016) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer , *aymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT: 7015 0640 0007 8199 3150 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Permit Number SD-- / (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑Preliminary ❑✓ Final PUD Being Requested? ❑✓ Yes ❑No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) The Stonehenge Investment Corporation MPPP 1 Lawson Lane Burlington, VT 05401 658-0355 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Bk 976, page 225 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) 985-5722 Snyder Residential Building Company, LLC csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Andrew Rowe - Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 878-4450 phone 878-3135 fax a. Contact email address: Andy@LDengineering.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0720-00025 & 0720-00027 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): The existing commercial building will remain on Lot 2. A 65 unit multi -family residential building is proposed for Lot 1, as well as associated site and utility improvements. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): An existing commercial office building (48,578 sf GFA) and related site improvements are located on Lot 2. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): The existing commercial office building (48,578 sf GFA) on Lot 2 will remain. A 65 unit multi -family residential buildinq is proposed on Lot 1. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): The existing commercial office building has a GFA of 48,578 sf. The new residential building has a GFA of 79,110 sf, plus 26,370 sf in the parking qaraqe. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): The existing office building is 3 stories. The new residential building has a parking garage on the lower level, plus 3 stories of living space. The new building will have a height of 52 feet. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 65 multi -family residential units are proposed for Lot 1. g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 222 employees were previously approved for the office building. No full time employees are proposed for the residential building. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): The project is located in the Stormwater Management Overlay District. i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. An adjustment to the existing property line between Lot 1 and Lot 2 is proposed. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: Proposed Lot 2 - 440,637 (acres /sq. ft.) Lot 1 - 136,465 sq. ft b. Building Coverage: Existing 18,014 square feet 4.3 0 sq.ft / 0% Proposed 18,014 square feet 4.1 % 26,695 sq. ft. / 19.6% c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 95,062 square feet 22.9 % 29,010 sq.ft / 18.0 % Proposed 123,300 square feet 28.0 % 58,035 sq.ft / 42.6 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing 720 square feet 9.2 % No frontage on Proposed 870 square feet 11.2 % Green Mountain Drive 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class 1, II, or III) on the subject property? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 145,000 SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 6,050,000 Landscaping: $ 43,160 (Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) parking/utilities = $ 500,000 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 42 new peak hour trips (residential) 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 7:30 - 8:30 AM & 4:30 - 5:30 PM 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Frida 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: May 2017 16. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shallpaid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. (15 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledg . NATU F APPLICANT Barry Mossman SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE OF SUBMISSION: Do not write below this line SEA A7aqd I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: ❑ Complete Administrative Officer 1-1 Incomplete Date PRINT NAME The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNA ATUKE (OF APPLICANT Barry Mossman R PRINT NAME V w� w a C Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: ✓ v / I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: Car"ete ) Incomplete The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 r � SELECTIVE REMOVAL OF UNDERSTORY GROWTH: - DO NOT OPERATE HEAVY EQUIPMENT IN THIS AREA OR STORE MATERIALS - SAVE AND PROTECT MATURE TREES LARGER THAN a -DIAMETER -REMWE DEADANDDYIIDTREES \ . REMOVE BRUSH AND TREES SMALLER THAN r DIAMETER - FOR TREES GREATER THAN 12" DIAMETER, REMOVE LIMBS TO A HEIGHT OF 8 FEET �. \ 1 } L� NEW 8'WOOD BENCH I 1 — / — - GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE NEW B WOOD BENCH \\ '.\ REMOVE EXISTING JUNIPER SHRUBS �.. rC \ \\ J �\ CCONSTRUTON IS�COMPLETEINSTALL - 20 o GARDEN SPACE \ \ ri W CREEPING JUNIPER JH SHRUBS NEW jV saM TAM 1.HV / \\ SELECTIVE REMOVAL OF tY GRowiH a VP Ye4 f i \VND111T C�h1MG' Irll r y I I I / nBPCN 9-GEERL ToWF I� \ t\ 4 ST 1 M RfW31N �.,- PE NNIAi BEE' NTWG SCH \ S CA I� -.. _' _ _ I I ~\MONUMENT 77 WE 1 la 11 I I / EXISTING OMMIE SIGN 44 Ivm QB I:I ♦ IIW \ 6 GY ! TING MONUMENT SIGN SHRUB REPLACEMENT i„ I -S I I NTS \ TGe 1 BN � , f \ • I I -LIMIT OF TREE y,l TDL I 82 HA CLEARING 1 CA - � I SOIL SPECIFICATIONS FOR TREE & SHRUB PLANTING AREAS / 5 AA GT 11'3 iGB 2/ 1 I, // 1, LANDSCAPE BACKFILL SWILL BE PREMIXED, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 50% 3A �Cp BGNA TOPSOL, 25%COMPOST. AND 25%NATIVE SOIL. IN CASES VWHERE THE NATIVE SOIL 5AA ff (/ MEETS THE TOPSOL SPECIFICATION, THE PROPORTIONS OF NATIVE SOIL MAY BE \ 1GT\ .BDL FCY T-'��,1-- / //ADIUSTEDUP TO TS%, 165W PROPOSED /// / 2. TOPSOILSHALLBECBTAINEDFRph NATURALLYWELLORAINEDSITESWTERETCPL Sg 147 CV MULTI -FAMILY BUILDING 90q TSA ! // OCCURS AT LEAST 4 INCHES DEEP. TOPSOIL SWILL NOT BE OBTAINED FROM WETLANDS. 1 LA / 51'S /p�' TOPSOIL SHALL BE LOOSE. FRIABLE. FREE OF ROOTS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, STONES � ! i 5 PO / LARGER THAN I INCH, AND OTHER DEBRIS. _ PA / ✓/' - _ 3. ALL IMPORTEDSCILSHALLBEREASOWIBLY FREE FROMROOTS,HMDCLAY,COARSE 5HT Tom, 2 HRA GPAVEL, STONES LARGER THAN TWO INCHES IN ANY DMENSION. NOXIOUS WEEDS, TALL J 13 b 5 ` 2+p - r .._ l �/ / GRASS. BRUSH. STICKS, STUBBLE, AND MAY MATERIALS THAT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL J TO THE PROPER DEVELOPMENT OF VEGETATIVE GROWTH. 31 low- /.�` / //+ 4. BOTH TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL SHALL HAVE A TEXTURE OF FINE SANDY LOAM PER THE USCA TEXTURM MAW E AND CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS'. . 3Ny /+/ //-N SIEVE NOASSING MMP BMP 10 80-1. DPM lots+ ' - //// / w saT�D +++-++ ea 12 PM Mj/ SLOPE TO BE BNNTNNF"Ol1C8Y ///.,. / / / / 2. 10-. PER SEAS"�,M�so CLAY LESS THAN 10a PH 5.5 TO 7.0 ORGANIC MATTER TOPSOIL: 10-15%, SUBSOIL LESS THAN ID% \ 2AL \ RDA +�-JI'/// / / \'� /-,•� / //////// �/ 5. COMPOST SHALL BE FREE OF WEED SEEDS AND COMPLYWM EPA RECUIREMENTS FOR / -- / / / ++-•' COMPOST. THE COMPOST SHALL HAVE A LOOSE AND GRANULAR TEXNRE, AND SHALL POSSESS W OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, AND SHALL NOT RESEMBLE THE —MATERIAL 1'GB \ E fLS-. 801", - �,..'��'� MIT OF TREE CLEARING / / / / / / FROM WHICH IT WAS DERIVED. COMPOST SHALL COMPLY WITH TABLE TITHE V /�/ / (PHYSICAL PROPERTTIONS OR CONSTRUCTION. REOUIREMENT3)0F THE VIRANS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FIX2 CONSTRUCTION. tAF {' -10 C8 i / __ f♦ -'' ���� /' - / �/ / // 6, TOASSURE THE GROWTH OF TREES,SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS, THE SOIL MUST NOT BE COMPACTED. ANY AREAS OF INADVERTENTLY COMPACTED SOIL IMLL NEED TO BE DECOMPACTEDUSING AEUBSOILER,CWSELPLOW.ORBYEXGIVATOJAND REP LACEMENTWITHUNCOMPACTEDSCIL. DONOTDRIVEEQUIPMENTONTHESOL / NEW WOOD BENCH -+'"/ / AFTER ITHAS BEEN PLACEDOR DECOMPACTED, FINE GRACINGAND PLANTINGOF 813 •-^"-+/ SPECIFIED LANDSCAPING MAY BE DONE USING LOW GROUND PRESSURE EGUIPMENT.IF THIS CAN BE ACHIEVED WITHOUT COMPACTION. �� T. DO NOT STOCKPILE SOL OR COMP0.5T IN WET OR MUpDY CONgTION3. PROVIDE 1 OR 23 .,, I t f "'^ / / / -^- � ` ++' + EROSION CO RRO TO PREVENT TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT OR DISTAWAY FROM THE / STORAGE AREA 8. SOLS WITHIN THE FULL SPECIFIED DEPTH SHALL HAVE A BULK DENSITY NOT EXCEEDNG 1.5glcrrP, SOILS SHALL EXHIBIT THE FOLLOWING CONE PENETROMETER READINGS: �J t 11P - BUR FACE RESISTANCE -LESS THAN 11OP31(r.T kgralW \ 18 BTORMWATEft BASIN \'- 1 -SUBSURFACE RESISTANCE-LE33 THAN 280 PSI 18.3 XpIcmTl PERENNIAL MIX-8ff "� LL�M j RANTING 901EDlIlEf / �'v/^`--^�AVI'-- 9. SOLMITY AND DEPTH SHALL BE ESTABLISHED TOWAROTHE ENDOFCOJSTRUCTIOJ (Ism SIR)/ "^ '� WAND, ONCE ESTABLISHED, SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION, EROSION, AND OTHER DETRIMENTAL INFLUENCES THROUGH THE END OF CONSTRUCTION, 1 t INFILTRATION EASE, ' .11 I I BROOK S• / / SEED WITH CONSERVATION MIX. BASIN TO BE MAINTAINED A9 .� T �GRASS(CUT24TasEs PLUMB TREE TRUNK ^ / 1 PLA,GE ROOT EAUL ON S3 TAMPE _C l =yam ` P^�1 P / PUNTING LANDSCAPE MIX 0 4 ' / PERENN SCHEDULE ` t / PLANTING SCHEDULE J (1130 SF) 1 /III llj ll / l// PERENNWL LTYP.) (SPACING VARIES SEE PLANS TTHICK3HREDDED HAROAOCD MULCH I I A MINIMUM_ 7 FROM STEMS 6 LANDSCAPE RANTING MIX - IEDIBTURBEO SOIL - —I—I PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL NTS SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 2' THICK SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH A MINIMUM OF T FROM STEM LANDSCAPE PLANTING MIX UNDISTURBED SOIL BREAK APART EDGE OF EXCAVATION WITH SHOVEL AND BLEND LANDSCAPE PLANTING MIX WITH EXISTING SOIL TO PROVIDE SOIL TRANSITION PLACE ROOTBALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS UNDISTURBED SOIL T THICK SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH A MINIMUM OF 3' FROM TREE TRUNK LANDSCAPE PLANTING MIX UNDISTURBED SOIL LANDSCAPE SOIL SEE PLANS FOR PLANT LIST K,y BaasoeWN Cwmmn \'an Sio, Remarks Trey A,, Aer:gemnaNi'adamn Fnlay' Frtanm Maple 2"Ul2 la"Cal. B&B, 6 foo16raading heigla AL Amefanchier be,N Allegheny Smviccbmry 2"b2I2 C,I. B&B, 6 fool h,. c gheight BN B,mlo niFra'Heribge' Haitega Rivm Rs& 2"b 21R"CH. B&B, 6 fool la,alating bei& CA Carnes Pagoda Dogwood I 1/2 b2"Cal, B&B « -ruz GB Gi.1 bdoba-A—Odd" Ginkgo 21/2 1o1 UI B&B,6f-1s. ddnghcgM GT Gled h 5h demarrm' Ho IR-1 21/21o3 CN B&B, 6 foot b-dung 1,401 HV Hamam,- B-- Amman teaN l 11/2.w2 Ca. B&gm weaala N Junipe 'g' Eaeb,n RM Cedar 6bTHdgM B&B QB Quer b'dr Swamp WMk Oak 2l/2"1o3 CalL fob , &g600linghc�,t QR Quer F NoMem Red Oak 21'2 "103Ca fobrand an iatbl Sk-& AA Aron ba rf I B (I" ntus,na' Red Choke_ 18 la 2a Hmght C-mcr AM Aron' 1 po W&,e" Bhrk Cbakdewy ltl b241kiSla ConMmw Cs corn verxea rmdbml' RWOac Dogwood 1811 W 2411 Height CoaNmn CY Corylur amerxama Amenr,n Hazelnut IB b24 HeMht Cwinbw DL Dlervl(la looker, NoMem Bmh HoneSeuklc IB'b24Wigia C_kwr N Ilea,arrxBbla SDi Red' Wmtmb_(f-.k) I8' b2a lle,ght P-awr IVm IW wrtx„lafa Soushem Gendemw' Wmimbmry(mek) 18'b24H.aa Cwmmv M Jw h«a I'BrHarb«' ....pinglwipa 11'gh ConNinm MP Morrell pe ylva NoMem Bobwry l8tp 1. 24pp 1 Iwas C.n PO Phye« p p (/ Ina Cenkr OW, N.Isak 18 2 11'BM -- PA Pmnm Wild Amminn Rum 18 W 2411 lleighl Cankmw PM -a-marllbna Beach Pura IB"b 24"HCi to ConMam RA Rhin aromarka Gmm Glad,' Fmgranl sumac 18" b 24" 11tIgla C aawr RE FAu. rica GroLow' Pmnaalc Fragrmt a— 8 b12 Height Conkvar SA 1}mpA poe albu Snowbmry IB b24 HmgM ConNMw w VlburmwprvnrJMwn BkvkMw Itl m2A Hnght Canmma Perenalab AG Andro w ard„ Big Blumlm, Plug` PladM on cmta AT Arcle lm mberosa ElatedlyMikes d plug ` Ran, 24 on cmta EP Echmacea pmpurawr Pale Connfbrwc Plug • PhAk 36" w ®w PD Pemreman dawlk Fonglave BuNm,gue Plug• Plant 36".Rader P1 I'aei�rm ,irXnnw SwachP Plug• Plant36"o — SO Symphyonichum obkn ,Aran Ammakc Aab Hag" PlAs. wemlm SP So/Ido . clmo Show Goldenrod Plug" Phnt24"w®b 98 Schizachyrmm sroparlwv'SwMbgOwdw' Llllle Blueekm PMe" Plant 24"on crab SN Sorghaemw nurans S,au B(w' Ind.. ... Plug" Planl i6 on Pere oral,-Gwandrowm CV Chrya"tlon rm -alamon Grtm aIN GuM PMg • Pt- li on cmlm CP Corex penrylwn,cn Oak sedge Plug • Plant 12" one ,R HA Hauebera amnlaana Gram Spxe Coral BeM %u8• Plant l2"ancmb WF Wnldrfein,o /rogarbldm Bantu Sbwb- Plue" PImt 12"ancmb Pero wh-Slmnaw .Bann MLT Avow ro(anna lweel Fla Plu " Pwvade approximalely.gwl ('urn rhkm Tmmdc Sad pl.." Juncuam Son Ranh pl..^ Eun«h,umpurpuremn Sweeo-ecenmd l«Pye Weed Plug• Lobe(la el hillma C-1 Bluc Lobelia Plug• umbra. of all abm,wam mfilbawnbaemapxo Phn124 on een mgaupe af5b 10. Pensf d ", tax love ll®Mon M Panx Switch m pl.^ S m h New En land Aalm Plu • Verno bar New Vole 4mwaed Vlu Vero CuWMa Root Plu UeeJul1ymoved2"agwreby45" plwda,r pho PLUMB TREE TRUNK PLACE ROOT RAIL ON TAMPED LANDSCAPE PLANTING MIX OR UNDISTURBED SOIL 2' THICK SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH A MINIMUM OF B' FROM TREETRUNK CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT CURBED ISLAND TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS GRAPHIC SCALE 30 D 15 30 60 120 Bn rasp r._ 1 irah � 30 ft. 083a15 DIDPAD FOR OPoLLRPHLES, GARDEN SPACE bp 03-27 -15 REV. PER PRELIM DXB REVIEW ADP COhNERC AL P LNG All se plans shell only N used for the pur- shown below' Q Sketeh/Conaept Q Act 250Review (] Preliinlimry Construction Final Local Review 0 Record Drswing Projeel No. 1400, 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive survey South Burlington, Vermont LANDSCAPE PLAN oJG,ked D.S 11 01 14 Scale Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers. Inc. shaetDT 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802-878-4450 5 wwvi. LDengineering.Dom RE: Green Mountain Drive https://mail2.sburl.co—/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABI... RE: Green Mountain Drive Temp Planner Sent:Thursday, July 02, 2015 10:47 AM To: Andrew Rowe [andy@ldengineering.com]; Paul Conner Cc: Chris Snyder [csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com]; ray Thanks, Andy. The staff comments and packet for this agenda item had already been finalized yesterday so the Board will not have a chance to view it over the weekend. However, thanks very much for the proposed revisions. I suggest bringing several 11 x 17 copies of this revised landscape plan and perhaps one full size and to be prepared to discuss it with the Board at the meeting. Thanks, Dan Dan Albrecht, Planner Temporary Assignment cell 802-324-4642 From: Andrew Rowe [andy@ldengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 1:26 PM To: Temp Planner; Paul Conner Cc: Chris Snyder Subject: RE: Green Mountain Drive Hi Dan & Paul — Thank you for discussing your comments with me yesterday, which I reviewed with Chris Snyder. PUD innovate design / project elements Since preliminary review, the number of proposed parking spaces has been increased to satisfy the contractual agreement with the tenant of the existing office building. As you noted, at Preliminary review the DRB approved a parking reduction waiver — which comprised one innovative element of the project's design. The applicant is seeking to offset the additional parking by enhancing the amenities proposed for the site. Site amenities The following enhancements are proposed for the site amenities, beyond that presented to the DRB at Preliminary review: - Fitness room — a common space inside the building, with fitness equipment, will be provided for the resident's use. The fitness room will supplement the opportunities for resident's to exercise at home (especially during the winter). There is also a walking trail loop on the project parcel, as well as the connection to the trail through the adjacent City parcel leading to the Pheasant Way neighborhood. - A concrete pad with common grill and tables will be provided at the southeast corner of the building. There will be a building exit (connected to the first floor lobby) to a stone chip path running down the slope to the common space. As noted on the plan, there will be selective removal of understory growth beyond the tree clearing limits, expanding the useable space behind the building under the tree canopy. - Garden space will be provided at the northeast corner of the building. The western exposure of this location will provide the most sun exposure, given the proposed building location and adjacent mature trees. A hose bib will be provided on the north end of the building for watering. Additional topsoil and soil amendments will be provided initially to insure suitable conditions for gardening. Benches will be also be provided adjacent to the garden and along the trail loop in the woods for both the residents and office employees use. The trail loop is a popular lunchtime route for the office employees. 1 of 2 7/2/2015 10:55 AM RE: Green Mountain Drive https://mail2.sburl Yowa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABI. Delineation of common / private space behind building The elevation of the porches and windows, as well as the proposed grading on the east side of the building create separation between the common space and private space of each dwelling. The elevation of the first floor is 226.0'. The finish grade adjacent to the building will be elevation 224.0' — 224.5'. The finish grade to the east slopes down at about a 13% grade to elevation 220'. Therefore, the elevation of the porches will be 6' higher than the adjacent common area, and the bottom of the windows will be about 10' higher than the common area. Additional trees near the toe of the slope adjacent to the building have also been proposed to supplement the vertical difference to delineate the separation between the living space and common area. Please let Chris or me know if you have any additional questions. Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 878-4450 2 of 2 7/2/2015 10:55 AM State of Vermont Agency of Commerce and Division for Historic Preservation [phone] 802-828-3211 Community Development One National Life Drive, Floor 6 [division faxl 802-828-32o6 Montpelier, VT 05620-0501 www.HistorieVermont.org RE: The Snyder Residential Building Company, LLC and Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. Proposed 65-Unit Residential Construction, 25 and 27 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, Vermont DISTRICT #4 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Application #4C0094-2F Entry of Appearance Please enter the appearance of the Vermont Division for Historic Preservation (VDHP), State of Vermont, by and through its staff, R. Scott Dillon, in the above captioned matter. Comments of the Division for Historic Preservation Criterion 8-Historic Sites Despite the statement to the contrary included in Schedule B of this application, the project area is highly likely to contain significant Precontact Native American archaeological sites. Application the VDHP's Environmental Predictive Model for Locating Precontact Archaeological Sites indicates that the project area scores at least 100 points (Attachment 1), well above the threshold of archaeological sensitivity of 32 points. This high score is predicated on the presence of the main channel of Bartlett Brook along the south and east border of the property, the wetlands associated with the brook, and on the presence of sandy sediments associated with the Champlain Sea shoreline throughout the project area. Several Native American archaeological sites have been documented at similar topographic positions, including an extensive site on the east side of Bay Road which was found during review of the Northwest Reliability transmission line project, two Native American sites found on the abutting UVM Horticultural Farm, and a site found recently on another residential development immediately to the southwest. The general archaeological sensitivity of the project area was confirmed during a site visit on July 1, 2015 with Andrew Rowe from Lamoureux & Dickinson. Although some evidence of disturbance was found near the part of Lot 17 previously developed, intact soil profiles were documented within the majority of the area proposed for the residential development and infrastructure. The original permit for the National Life Subdivision including this parcel was issued in 1982 with no specific comments from the VDHP. Based on discussions with Mr. Rowe, the VDHP understands that the Applicants will contract with a qualified archaeological consultant to complete all appropriate archaeological work DHP Entry of Appearance: The Snyder Residential Building Co, LLC & The Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc Page 2 of 2 July 7, 2015 within the project area. The VDHP further understands that this work will be undertaken in the near future, and fully expects to be able to work with the Applicants and their engineers to resolve all matters relative to the archaeological concerns on the property. However, we respectfully request that the application remain open with regard to the historic sites aspect of Criterion 8 in order to fully address these concerns. We expect that we will be able to file a comment letter shortly after the archaeological work is completed. Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 7th day of July, 2015 VERMONT DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION By: �) R. Scott Dillon Survey Archeologist National Life Davis Building Vermont Division for Historic Preservation One National Life Drive-6th Floor Montpelier, VT 05620-0501 802-272-7358 scott.d i llon@state. vt.u.s CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I Jennifer Lavoie, hereby certify on this 7th day of July, 2015, a copy of the foregoing Vermont Division for Historic Preservation, Entry of Appearance for ACT 250 NOTICE MINOR APPLICATION #4C0094-2F was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the following individuals without email addresses and by email to the individuals with email addresses listed. The Snyder Residential Building Company, LLC 4079 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 csLiyder@sLiyderhomesvt.com Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Jennifer Mojo, Regulatory Planner Agency of Natural Resources National Life Drive, Davis 2 Montpelier, VT 05602 anr.act250(abstate.vt.us Jennifer.moio@state-vt.us District 94 Environmental Commission Barry Murphy Parker Riehle, Acting Chair Vt. Dept. of Public Service James McNamara/Monique Gilbert 112 State Street, Drawer 20 111 West Street Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Essex Junction, VT 05452 bLny.mgMhy@state.vt.us The Stonehedge Investment Corp, Inc One Lawson Lane Burlington, VT 05401 VTmossmankaol.com Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, Selectboard/ Chair, Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Craig Keller Utilities & Permits/VTrans One National Life Drive, Drawer 33 Montpelier, VT 05633 crai .kg ellergstate.vt.us Act 250 Coordinator Vt. Agency of Agri., Food & Markets 116 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2901 AGR.ACT250&state.vt. us Andrew Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson White River NRCD Office 14 Morse Drive 617 Comstock Road, Suite 1 Essex, VT 05452 Berlin, VT 05602 andy@ldengineering.co whiterivernrcdA�amail.com Charlie Baker, Executive Director Regina Mahony, Senior Planner Chittenden County Reg Plann Commission 110 West Canal Street, Suite 202 Winooski, VT 05404 cbaker@a ccrpcvt.org rmahony9—ccrpcvt.org NRCS, District Conservationist USDA Soils Conservation Service 1193 S. Brownell Road, Suite 35 Williston, VT 05495-7416 j ohn.thurgood@vt.usda.gov County Forester/ANR I I I West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Keith.thompson(ac3i state.vt.us John Gobeille/ANR Dept of Fish & Wildlife I I I West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 John.Gobeillena,state.vt.us PgAy.malenfant@state.vt.us Green Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446 allen@greenmountainpower.com Brian Gray Vermont Gas Systems PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 bgray@vennontgas.com Project Intake Coordinator Efficiency Vermont 128 Lakeside Ave, Suite 401 Burlington, VT 05401 picsa,veic.org Michael Barsotti, Water Quality Director Champlain Water District 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 mikeb _ cwd-h20.org Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 7th day of July, 2015 BY: _ wv�.i,�er t..avo�e Jennifer Lavoie Administrative Assistant, VDHP ray From: Dave Wheeler Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:41 AM To: Temp Planner; ray Cc: Tom Dipietro Subject: RE: 25-27 Green Mountain Drive, Stormwater Da n, The Stormwater Section has reviewed the plans for the "25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive" prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, LLC, dated 11/1/14 and last revised on 6/17/15. We would like to offer the following comments: 1. This project is located in the Bartlett Brook watershed, which is listed as stormwater impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Also, the property is already subject to a State of Vermont stormwater discharge permit (3017-9010.11). Since the project proposes to expand upon the existing impervious area the existing State permit must be revised before construction begins. 2. The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of land. It will therefore require a stormwater construction permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire this permit before starting construction. 3. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. 4. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to provide record drawings per the requirements of section 12.03F. Thanks for the opportunity to comment, Dave �yM Ziav`rd P l�heeler Assiatant Stofmwater Snperiatendent Deepartmf-nt oftPub -c't1%od-,3 City-uf S, uth Burina2-ton f802) 658- 'a61 Ext. 113 Notice- Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of docmnents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a Citv official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which nay be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Temp Planner Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:43 PM To: andy@ldengineering.com; Tom Dipietro Cc: ray Subject: 25-27 Green Mountain Drive, Stormwater Hi folks I'll be wrapping up staff comments on this on Thursday around noon. If you have a chance to provide any updated language / narrative / mutual understandings that I can cut and paste that would be great. If not, that's okay. 1 Dan Albrecht, Planner Temporary Assignment cell 802-324-4642 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 12 th day of June 32015 , a copy of the foregoing public notice for final plat [type of application] # SD-15-18 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) MDT Partnership, LLP 1650 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Heritage Automotive Group, Inc. 1580 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert Berman, LLC 35 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Kurt & Laura Reichelt Kurt V. Reicheit Rev. Trust 163 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Lark Inns, LP 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 UVM-Campus Planning Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405 City of South Burlington c/o Planning & Zoning Dept 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dated at Essex [town/city], Vermont, this 12th day of June , 2015 Printed Name: Andrew Rowe Phone number and email: 878-44 0- A @L gineering.com Signature:, Date: June 12, 2015 Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Proposed Parking Summary March, 2015 Parking REQUIRED Per Land Development Regulations Residential / Multi -family 2 spaces per dwelling unit plus 1 space/4 units (garage spaces assigned) 147 spaces required Commercial / Office 3.5 spaces per 1000 sf GFA 171 spaces required (48,578 sf x 3.5 spaces/1000 sf) TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 318 spaces Parking PROPOSED on Final Plans Residential / Multi -family 64 garage spaces 54 surface spaces 118 spaces TOTAL (1.8 spaces per dwelling unit) Commercial / Office 172 spaces (3.5 spaces per 1000 sf GFA) TOTAL PARKING PROPOSED = 288 spaces Shared parking calculation requires a maximum of 282 spaces (see attached) No parking reduction waiver needed under Section 13.01.N.(2) Project: 25 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT Project #: 14001 # Req'd Proposed Land -Uses Ratio S aces General Retail 0 sf 5 0 Office 48,578 sf 3.5 171 Medical/Dental Office 0 sf 5 0 Residential 65 units 2 + vistr 147 Restaurant - Sit Down 0 sf 18 0 Restaurant - High Turnover 0 sf 18 0 Total 318 Lamoureux & Dickinson Shared Parking Calculations Date: March 2015 By: R. Dickinson a.k.a. Fine/Casual a.k.a. Family Sources: South Burlington Land Development Regulations Shared Parking, 2nd Ed., ULI Weekday Shared Use Parking Hourly Ratios 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Retail 1% 5% 15% 30% 55% 75% 90% 100% 100% 100% 95% 85% 80% 75% 65% Office 0% 1% 20% 60% 100% 45% 15% 45% 100% 45% 15% 10% 5% 2% 1% Medical/Dental Office 0% 0% 90% 90% 100% 100% 30% 90% 100% 100% 90% 80% 67% 30% 15% Residential 100% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 70% 70% 70% 75% 85% 90% 97% 98% Restaurant - Sit Down 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 40% 75% 75% 65% 40% 50% 75% 95% 100% 100% Restaurant - High Turnover 1 25% 50% 60% 75% 85% 90% 100% 90% 50% 45% 45% 75% 80% 80% 80% Weekday Required Parking Spaces by Hour 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 General Retail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Offices 0 2 35 103 171 77 26 77 171 77 26 18 9 4 2 Personal Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 147 133 125 118 111 103 96 103 103 103 111 125 133 143 145 Restaurant - Sit Down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Restaurant - High Turnover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 147 135 160 221 282 180 122 180 274 180 137 143 142 147 147 Maximum 282 suaces Weekend Shared Use Parking Hourly Ratios 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Retail 1% 5% 10% 35% 60% 70% 85% 95% 100% 100% 95% 90% 80% 75% 65% Office 0% 20% 60% 80% 90% 100% 90% 80% 60% 40% 20% 10% 5% 0% 0% Medical/DentalOffice 0% 0% 90% 90% 100% 100% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Residential 100% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 70% 70% 70% 75% 85% 90% 97% 98% Restaurant - Sit Down 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 50% 55% 45% 45% 45% 60% 90% 95% 100% Restaurant - High Turnover 10% 25% 45% 70% 90% 90% 100% 85% 65% 40% 45% 60% 70% 70% 65% Weekend Required Parking Spaces by Hour 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 General Retail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Offices 0 35 103 137 154 171 154 137 103 69 35 18 9 0 0 Personal Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 147 133 125 118 111 103 96 103 103 103 111 125 133 143 145 Restaurant - Sit Down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Restaurant - High Turnover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1 147 168 228 255 265 274 250 240 206 172 146 143 142 143 145 Maximum 274 soaces P:\2014\14001\Parking\shared parking 03-2015.gpw, 03/17/15 27 Green Mountain Drive Landscape Estimate of Probable Cost April 2015 Item Size Unit Cost` Quantity Extended Cost Trees Acerx freemanii 'Autumn Fantasy' Freeman maple 2" - 2 1/2" Cal $550 6 $3,300 Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry 2" - 2 1/2" Cal $550 7 $3,850 Betula nigra 'Heritage' Heritage river birch 2" - 2 1/2" Cal $550 3 $1,650 Corpus alternifolia Pagoda dogwood 1 1/2" - 2" Cal $375 8 $3,000 Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' Ginkgo 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $700 4 $2,800 Gleditsia triacanthos 'Shademaster' Honeylocust 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $700 6 $4,200 Hamamelis virginiana American witchhazel 1 1/2" - 2" Cal $325 10 $3,250 Juniperus virginiana 'Canaertii' Eastern red cedar 6' - 7' height $250 4 $1,000 Quercus rubra Northern red oak 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $700 3 $2,100 Shrubs Deciduous shrub 18" - 24" $65 239 $15,535 Evergreen shrub 8" min. $45 55 $2,475 Subtotal $43,160 Perennial Plugs - see plans 2" sq x 4.5" deep $4.50 343 $1,544 Groundcover Plugs - see plans 2" sq x 4.5" deep $4.00 1268 $5,072 Stormwater basin mix Plugs - see plans 2" sq x 4.5" deep $4.00 735 $2,940 Subtotal $9,556 Proposed construction costs Building construction $6,050,000 Site work $500,000 TOTAL $6,550,000 Required Landscaping Value $ 250,000 @ 3% $7,500 $ 250,000 @ 2% $5,000 $ 6,050,000 @ 1 % $60,500 TOTAL $73,000 Proposed Landscaping Value Trees & shrubs $43,160 Contribution to GM Drive sidewalk $29,840 TOTAL $73,000 0�. V 1C,RMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division Essex Regional Office iii West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 www.septic.yt.gov June 23, 2015 Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. c/o Barry Mossman One Lawson Lane Burlington VT 05401 Agency of Natural Resources [phone] 802-879-5656 [fax] 802-879-3871 Subject WW-4-1320-1 proposed sixty five unit residential building with thirty-seven (one bedroom) units and twenty eight (two bedroom) units on Lot #i and a boundary adjustment between Lots #1 and #2 with Lot #1 being 3.13 acres and Lot #2 being 10.12 acres, construction of located on 27 Green Mountain Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Ladies & Gentlemen: I reviewed the application and technical information submitted for the above referenced project. Unfortunately, there were items that were not included or were insufficient and I was unable to determine if this project meets the minimum standards of the Environmental Protection Rules. Please provide the following information: i. Please submit a copy of the Permit to Construct for the water main extension. 2. Please submit a profile of the water line. 3. Please submit 2 copies of any revised plans and an updated page 4 of the application form. Please respond within thirty, (3o) days from the date of this letter. Re -submittals that are incomplete or made after thirty days may result in the denial of the project. I will continue my review of the project once I receive the information requested. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, J ssanne Wyman Regional Engineer cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Andrew Rowe/Lamoureux & Dickinson Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury VERMONT Form Property Transfer Tax Return PT-1 72 0 o IUIIIIYIVNIIVIIIVII�I�INllnllll�ll� SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) INFORMATION TOTAL number If more than 2, of SELLERS 1 attach Form 172-S. 3LACK OUT Entity SELLER #1 Federal ID number Individual SELLER #1 Social Security Number Individual SELLER #2 Social Security Number )NTOWN :OPY ONLY 03 0277655 Entity SELLER #1 Name THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC., MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST, BARRY MOSSMAN, TRUSTEE Individual SELLER #1 Last Name First Name Initial Entity SELLER #1 or Individual SELLER #1 Mailing Address Following Transfer (Number and Street or Road Name) ONE LAWSON LANE, SUITE 250 City or Town State Zip Code BURLINGTON VT 05401 Individual SELLER #2 Last Name First Name Initial Individual SELLER #2 Mailing Address Following Transfer (Number and Street or Road Name) City or Town State Zip Code BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) INFORMATION TOTAL number If more than 2, ❑ INTERNATIONAL of BUYERS 1 attach Form 172-B. address checkbox )LACK OUT Entity BUYER #1 Federal ID number Individual BUYER #1 Social Security Number Individual BUYER #2 Social Security Number )N TOWN :OPY ONLY Entity BUYER #1 Name CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Individual BUYER #1 Last Name First Name Entity BUYER #1 or Individual BUYER #1 Mailing Address Following Transfer (Number and Street or Road Name) 113 PATCHEN ROAD City or Town State Zip Code SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 Individual BUYER #2 Last Name First Name Individual BUYER #2 Mailing Address Following Transfer (Number and Street or Road Name) City or Town State Zip Code For Town Use Only Initial Initial 1039 1 1 Form PT-172, Page Rev. 08/13 Buyer#1or Entity CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SSN or FID Property Location PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT- 25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE Date of Closing IIWININ�II�IIVII�V�IIIVIIVNIII�I PROPERTY LOCATION Number and Street or Road Name PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT- 25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE City or Town VT SOUTH BURLINGTON DATE OF CLOSING INTEREST IN PROPERTY - Write the number from the list If "4", enter p/O 7 % Interest here 1. Fee Simple 3. Undivided 1/2 Interest 5. Time -Share 7. EasementfRow M M D D Y Y Y Y 2. Life Estate 4. Undivided _% Interest 6. Lease 8. Other LAND SIZE (Acres or fraction thereof) SPECIAL If sale was between family members, ❑ Check if development rights have FACTORS enter number from list below been conveyed . + 1. Husband/Wife 2. Parent/Child 3. Grand parent/Grandchild 4. Other FINANCING: ❑ Conventional/Bank ❑ Owner Financing ❑ Other TYPE OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (Check all that apply) 1. ❑ None 5. ❑ Farm Buildings 9. ❑ Store 2. ❑ Factory 6. ❑ Multi -Family with Dwelling Units Transferred 10. ❑ Residential New Construction 3. ❑ Single Family Dwelling 7. ❑ Mobile Home 11. X❑ Other COMMERCIAL 4. ❑ Seasonal Dwelling 8. ❑ Condominium with Units Transferred SELLER'S USE OF PROPERTY 1. Primary Residence 4. Timberland 7. Commercial BEFORE TRANSFER 2 2. Open Land 5. Operating Farm 8. Industrial (Enter number from list) 3. Secondary Residence 6. Government Use 9. Other ❑ Check if property was rented BEFORE transfer BUYER'S USE OF PROPERTY 1. Primary Residence 4. Timberland 7. Commercial AFTER TRANSFER 9 2. Open Land 5. Operating Farm 8. Industrial (Enter number from list) 3. Secondary Residence 6. Government Use 9. Other P E DE S T R I AN PATH ❑ Check if property will be rented AFTER transfer ❑ Check if property was purchased by tenant ❑ Check if buyer holds title to any adjoining property AGRICULTURAL/MANAGED FOREST LAND USE VALUE PROGRAM, 32 V.S.A. Chapter 124 If transfer is exempt from Property Transfer ❑ 1. Check if property being conveyed is subject to a land use change tax lien Tax, cite exemption number from instructions and 2 complete Sections M, N, and 0 below. ❑ 2. Check if new owner elects to continue enrollment of eligible property Transfer to Municipality TOTAL Price Paid Price paid for Personal Property Price paid for Real Property 0.00 State type of Personal Property If price paid for Real Property is less than fair market value, please explain Value of purchaser's principal resi- For transfers prior to July 1, 2011, fair market value For transfers prior to July 1, 2011, fair market dence included in Line 0 for special of property enrolled in current use program included value of qualified working farm included in Line 0 tax rate (See instructions) in Line 0 for special tax rate for special tax rate PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX DUE from rate schedule on page 3 of this form. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS. Make checks payable to VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES DATE SELLER ACQUIRED IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, cite exemption(s) from instructions on page 5 of this booklet 11 29 2010 2 7 M M D D Y Y Y Y For Town Use Only Form PT•172, Page 2 of 4 1039 Rev, 08/13 Buyer#1 or Entity CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SSN or AD Property Location PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT— 25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE Date of Closing * 1 3 1 7 2 1 3 0 1 RATE SCHEDULE Tax on Special Rate Property 1. Value of purchaser's principal residence. Also enter on Line P. (See instructions) ....... . ... . ........... 1. 2. For transfers prior to July 1, 2011, value of property enrolled in current use program. Also enter on Line Q.... 2. 3. For transfers prior to July 1, 2011, value of qualified working farm. Also enter on Line R................... 3. 4. Add Lines 1,2,and 3....................................................................... 4. 5. Tax rate...................................................................................5. 6. Tax due on Special Rate Property (Multiply Line 4 by Line 5) ........................... . ..... . . .. . ... 6. Tax on General Rate Property 7. Enter amount from Line 0 on page 2 of this form .. . .................................. . . ... . . .. . . . . . 7. 8. Enter amount from Line 4 above ...... . ........................... . .............. . . .......... . .. 8. 9. Subtract Line 8 from Line 7.............. ........................................ . . . ........... 9. 10. Tax rate..................................................................................10. 11. Tax due on General Rate Property (Multiply Line 9 by Line 10)....................................... 11. TOTAL TAX DUE 12. Add Line 6 and Line 11. Enter here and on Line S on page 2 of this form . . .. . .......................... 12. LOCAL AND STATE PERMITS AND ACT 250 NOTICE 0.005 0.0125 The parties are hereby given notice that: • The property being transferred may be subject to regulations governing potable water supplies and wastewater systems under 10 V.S.A. chapter 64 and building, zoning and subdivision regulations; • The property being transferred may be subject to Act 250 regulations regarding land use and development under 10 V.S.A. chapter 151; • The parties have an obligation to investigate and disclose knowledge regarding flood regulations affecting the property. To determine if the property is in compliance with or exempt from these rules, contact the relevant agency. Contact information is provided in the instructions on page 7. ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form RW-171 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer is exempt from income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): ❑ 1. Under penalties of perjury, seller(s) certifies that at the time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyer(s) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate number from the Commissioner of Taxes in advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this is a transfer without consideration. (See instructions for Form RW-171.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee in a foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration, For Town Use Only Form PT-172, Page 3 of 4 1039 Rev. 08113 Buyer#1or Entity CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SSN or FID Property Location PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT— 25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE Date of Closing * 1 3 1 7 2 1 4 0 1* Transferor and Transferee state that the information submitted on this return is true, correct and complete to the best of their knowledge. Prepared by (print or type) GRAVEL Preparer's Address PO BOX 369 BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0369 & SHEA PC Buyer's Representative Buyer's Representative Telephone Town or City: Please forward original to the VT Department of Taxes within 30 days of receipt. Book Number or Town THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK Page Number Grand List Value Parcel ID Number Grand List Category" SPAN ACKNOWLEDGMENT Return received. * Please use the following numeric two -digit grand list category codes Residential <6 Acres .............01 Residential >6 Acres .............02 Mobile Home/Un ................03 Mobile Home/La ................04 Seasonal<6 Acres ..............05 Grand List year of , Clerk DATE Seasonal>6 Acres ..............06 Commercial ....................07 Commercial Apt.................08 Industrial ......................09 Utilities Elec....................10 Date of Record M M D D Y Y Y Y Utilities Other...................11 Farm .........................12 Other .........................13 Woodland .....................14 Miscellaneous ..................15 For Town Use Only 1039 Form PT•172, Page 4 of 4 Rev. 08/13 CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT Dedicated to Quality Water & Service 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. Andrew Rowe, PE Phone: (802) 864-7454 Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Fax: (802) 864-0435 14 Morse Drive April 6, 2015 Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: Act 250 Review: Proposed Multi -Family Building, 27 Green Mt. Drive, South Burlington, VT Dear Mr.Rowe: In response to your request dated April 2, 2015 for information regarding the Champlain Water District's capability to supply water to the referenced proposed project, we submit the following: 1. Water is supplied to the referenced area via 16" transmission main and local distribution mains. 2. Adequate water storage is located just north of the intersection of Spear Street and Allen Road as provided by a pair of 500,000 gallon water storage tanks. 3. CWD water treatment and transmission capacity is sufficient to supply this increase in system demand. Your water supply requirement for the proposed multi -family building project could. be furnished by the Champlain Water District without restricting or encumbering its present users on the CWD supply system. 4. Capability of the local water distribution system and adequacy of local water storage volume must be verified by the local water system official. 5. This letter of availability is valid for a three year period commencing on today's date, and ending on April 6, 2018. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT Richard A. Pratt Chief Engineer / Assistant General Manager cc: (via e-mail) J. Fay J. Tymecki J. Rabidoux P. Connor R. Belair SOU'l J BURLINGTON WATER L#-!PARTME11T 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 www.sburl.com February 10, 2015 Mr. Andrew Rowe, P.E. Lamoreux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: 27 Green Mountain Drive, SD-1 4-34, South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Rowe, In response to your request as to the capability of the South Burlington water distribution system to supply water to the above referenced project we submit the following Preliminary Allocation Determination: 1. Sufficient water storage and capacity is located at the South Burlington West Tanks located off Allen Road in South Burlington. 2. Based upon your final allocation request, a water service connection fee and allocation fee shall be applied to this project according to the City Water Ordinance Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified at any time by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council. 3. Your water supply requirement for this proposed project of 12,555 gpd and can be furnished by this Department without restricting or encumbering present South Burlington water customers. 4. You are also required to contact the Champlain Water District (CWD) in order that they verify supply, treatment, and transmission capability as the wholesale water supplier for the South Burlington Water Department. 5. Any significant increase in current demand or any change in use will require water allocation re -approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 6, Water is supplied to the referenced area through 8" distribution mains. 7. Preliminary Allocation Determination shall not constitute a binding commitment of capacity to the applicant and may be revoked by the Superintendent before a final allocation of capacity is granted if uncommitted reserve capacity ceases to be available. A preliminary determination may be used by the applicant that a proposed development has sufficient water capacity available to proceed through the development process. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, South Burlington Water Department John Tymecki Sur)adntender (via email) J. Fay D. Pratt J. Rabidoux P. Connor R. Belair APPLICATION FOR WATER ALLOCATION * Items marked with an asterisk must be filled in by ALL applicants * Applicant Information Applicant: Contact Person: Mailing Address: Telephone & Fax for Contact: Property Owner Name (if not applicant): Property Owner Mailing Address: The Snyder Construction Company, LLC Andrew Rowe, Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive, Essex Junction,VT 05452 ph. 878-4450 fax# 878-3135 Stonehenge Investment Corp. (Barry Mossman) 1 Lawson Lane Burlington, VT 05401 * P I_ locatio f project: 27 Green Mountain Drive Si ure of Applicant . * Project Information If the project is a single-family home, please check one: New Existing (For existing homes, no Application is required if revised demand is. less than 1,000 gpd.) If not single-family home, project name: 65 unit multi -family building * Application or Permit Numbers: (from Department of Planning & Zoning) # SD .14. . 34 Engineer's information for flows over 1,000 .gpd Name of Engineer: Andrew Rowe Firm: Lamoureux & Dickinson Mailing Address: 14 Morse Drive, Essex Junction,VT 05452 Phone & Fax: ph. 878-4450, fax# 878-3135 PE License #: 8070 * Flow Calculations (You may substitute an engineer's calculation or letter containing the information requested below) For additional bedrooms in single-family homes: Number of existing bedrooms: Number of additional bedrooms requested: Page 1 APPLICATION FOR WATER ALLOCATION e..,...4N..r nrninntc lief mimhar of hartrnnmc and imIN rAnllPsted: Number of bedrooms x Number of units x Gallons per day I per unit = Total flows 1 37 150 5,550 2 28 300 840 3 1450 4 600 5 750 6+ (specify) TOTAL 65 units 13,950 GPD For commercial and industrial .pro ects, list existing and proposed tenants, uses ana rows: Tenant / Number of Other Business Tvpe of use seats, SF, etc. x Flow per unit Adjustments I Total flow * Total development water flow requested Please do not write below this line Apart y W ter Department SPperirVendent of Water Preliminary Allocation approved: 13,950 gallons or dagry�yL �ou�,.,G/jq�UrCS, Dale o ao�s" ate Final Allocation approved: Date Final Allocation Expires: with permit # - - (Date) For Extensions of Final Allocation Only EXTENSION GRANTED to (Date) (Date of Expiration) G:Word:SBForms:W aterallocatlonForm. Page 2 FOR HiTERNALUSE ONLY WWA Permit Crff QF SOMM BjMljNGTQN APPLICATION for WASTEWATER ALLO CATIQN *Items marked with an asterisk must be filled in by ALL applicants *"PIJCANTI"ORMAUON Applicant: The Snyder Construction Company, LLC do Chris Snyder Contact Person: Andrew Rowe, Lamoureux &Dickinson Mailing Address-, 14 Morse Drive, Essex Junction,VTO5462 Andy@LDengineedng.com Telephone & Fax for Contact Person: ph, 878-4460 fax 878-3135 Property Owner Name (if not applicant): - Stonehenge Investment Corp. MPPP Property Owner Mailing Address: lLawson Lane Burlington, VT 05401 *Physical Location of project. 27 Green Mountain Drive 19f e of AP-P-1 i cant— *Signature of Property Owner/ (Bothapplicant and property owner MUST sign the application!} *Project Information If the project is a single-family home, please check one: =lNewE=kwisting If not a single-family home, project name: New .65unit mufti -family building *Application or Permit Numbers: (from Planning & Zoning office) #_ SD — 14 _ _34 Engineer's Information for flows over i,000 gpd Name of Engineer: Andrew Rowe Firm: Lamoureux &Dickinson Mailing Address: 14 Morse Drive Essex, Vr, 06452 Phone & Fax: ph, 87BA450 fax 878-3135 PE License #: 8070 *Flow Calculations (You may substitute an engineer's calculation or letter for the information requested below) Fnr re.Sidential nrniects. list number of bedrooms and units reauested: Number of Bedrooms Number of Units X Gallons per day per unit Total Flows 1 37 units 140 5,180 GPD 2 or more 28 units 210 6,880 GPD TOTAL 65 units 11,060 GPD Notes: For commercial and industrial projects, list existing and proposed tenants, uses and flows: Tenant/ Type of use Number of Flows per Other Total Business seats, SF, etc X unit Adiustments Flow TOTAL *Total development wastewater flow requested: 11,060 gallons per day Flow characteristics (for commercial and industrial projects) Volume: Flow rate: Strength: r s Please do not write below this Iine Application & Recording Fee received: Name Date Receiving Plant: rport Pkwy artlett Bay City Center District; es No Approved by Water Pollution Control Department (Commercial and Industrial Projects) )f $1 191 Director of r/er ' llution Control Date Preliminary allocation issued: (payment of fee is not required) 'irector of Planning and Zoning Date Final allocation issued: (payment of fee is required, either in full or pro -rated for projects with multiple zoning permits involved) Director of Planning and Zoning Final allocation expires (Date) Date with permit # Zoning permit issued with permit# (Date) Associated WW connection permit (if applicable) # .For extensions of FinalAllocati©n Only EXTENSION GRANTED (Date) to (Date of Expiration) 5o% EXTENSION FEE PAID $ l- (Date) (Amount) 2 � Lamoureux &t Dickinson Engineers Surveyors Planners Wetland & Soil Scientists May 7, 2015 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Final Plan Application Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of The Snyder Construction Company, LLC to request Final Plan review for a proposed planned unit development at 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive. This application involves a total of 13.25 acres, which originally comprised Lot 17 of the National Life subdivision. An existing office building is located at 25 Green Mountain Drive on tax map parcel 0720-00025 (9.55 acres). Tax map parcel 0720-00027 is mostly undeveloped, with only paved parking for the adjacent office building located on the 3.7 acre lot. The Development Review Board reviewed the preliminary plan application on January 6. This application proposes a boundary line adjustment and construction of a 65 unit multi -family residential building on the easterly lot. The layout of the multi -family building allows for shared parking with the existing office use. The expanded and reconstructed parking areas increase the total number of surface parking on the project site by 46 spaces. The parking garage, located underneath the new building, will provide 64 additional spaces. The enclosed shared parking analysis requires a maximum of 282 spaces. A total of 288 surface and garage parking spaces are proposed. At the request of the current commercial tenant (Allscripts), the number of surface parking spaces has been increased since preliminary plan review. Based upon the current and potential maximum number of employees, as well as the number of bedrooms proposed in the multi -family building, the proposed number of parking spaces is adequate. In addition, this project has the potential to utilize multimodal transportation — as the project is located near many potential employment opportunities, near the CCTA bus route, as well as the potential for carpooling given the location near Route 7. A new concrete sidewalk will link the multi -family building with Green Mountain Drive. The alignment of the new sidewalk meanders through the many existing trees north of the access drive. In addition to the sidewalk, the existing wooded trail loops and connectivity will be maintained. The trail loop east of the new building will connect to the new sidewalk, looping back to the parking lot at the southwest corner of the new building. This 1000' loop will continue to be available for use by the office building employees, as well as the residents. 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802.878.4450 www.LDengineering.com ♦ Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service E Benches will be placed at several locations along the trail. The trail connection to the Quail Run/Pheasant Way neighborhood will be unaffected. Bike storage will be provided in the parking garage. A total of three stories of living space will be constructed over the parking garage. The main entrance, with access to the elevator, is located near the middle of the building facing the parking lot. A color rendering of the building, as well as black & white elevation drawings of the trash & recycling building are enclosed. A height waiver is requested for a maximum building height of 52 feet. The average preconstruction grade is 217'. The elevation of the mid -point of the sloped roof is 266.4'. The calculated building height of 49 feet has been rounded to 52 feet for purposes of the height waiver request. We understand that a condition of approval will likely be the recording of a Notice of Condition that both parcels will be treated as a single lot for planning and zoning purposes. An easement plan will be prepared prior to construction, presenting the various easements and reciprocal rights between the two parcels in regards to utilities, access, shared parking, and their related maintenance. The enclosed landscaping plan (sheet 5) presents new plantings, as well as the clearing limits for construction. The project will maintain many mature trees, mostly white pines to the east of the new building. A limited area of understory clearing is proposed just east of the lawn area adjacent to the building. The understory clearing and the lawn area will provide a large secluded area for the resident's use. A common grilling area with picnic tables is located off the northeast corner of the building. Access to this area will be provided from the first floor lobby through an entry at the southeast corner of the building. The value of the proposed landscaping is less than that required by the Land Development Regulations, primarily due to the high building construction cost. The required landscaping value per Section 13.06 of the LDRs is $73,000. The value of the proposed trees and shrubs is $43,160. The DRB granted a waiver at preliminary plat review, provided that the applicant contributed the difference towards the design and construction of a new sidewalk along Green Mountain Drive between the project parcel and US Route 7. The applicant remains agreeable to making a contribution of $29,840 to the City, to be used for design and construction of the new sidewalk. The project is located in the Bartlett Brook watershed and the Stormwater Management Overlay District. Stormwater management will take advantage of the sandy soils for infiltration. All rooftop runoff will be collected in gutters and piped directly to an infiltration trench along the easterly and southerly sides of the building. Runoff from the new parking areas will be directed to an infiltration basin at the southwest corner of the building. All runoff will be infiltrated onsite for events up to the 25 year design storm (including the 2 year storm requiring evaluation for the Stormwater Management Overlay District). The stormwater management system will be maintained by the building owner. A small building for trash & recycling storage is proposed at the end of the parking lot at the west end of the new residential building. The frequency of trash and recycling pick-up will be adjusted to meet the demand of the residents, but often enough to avoid odors. Lights controlled by motion sensors will be located inside the building and at the access door. Pole mounted LED cut off light fixtures are proposed to illuminate the parking areas adjacent to the new residential building. This includes removal and replacement of two existing pole mounted metal halide light fixtures. A building mounted LED cutoff light fixture will be located at the parking garage entrance. Recessed light fixtures will also be located within the alcove at the main entrance. The light fixture cut sheets and illumination levels are shown on the plans. The following address Preliminary Plat conditions of approval (numbered items correspond to the condition of approval): 3a. (1) The applicant is aware that the South Burlington Fire Marshal's office will be reviewing the building plans for compliance with the VT Fire and Building Safety Codes. (2) As discussed with Chief Brent and Terry Francis on January 6, the hydrant originally proposed was deleted and replaced with two hydrants located between the sidewalk and building, on either side of the main entrance to the residential building. (3) The landscaping proposed around the building has been selected to not interfere with access to the proposed doors and windows, or deployment of firefighting equipment. (4) We have reviewed circulation through the existing and proposed parking lots for a WB40 design vehicle. To accommodate the truck turning radius, two parking spaces have been deleted from the south end of the existing parking area (see sheet 1). 3b. A specification for the landscape planting mix has been added to the Landscaping Plan (sheet 5). 3c. The proposed easement to the City along the water service to the new building has been deleted. 3d. A proposed pedestrian easement along the westerly side of Lot 2 has been added to the Site Plan and Property Plat. The following are enclosed for your review: - Application for Final Subdivision Plat & PUD Review - $2873.00 application fee [$500 base fee + $13 recording fee + ($25/unit x 2 units) + ($50/unit x 7 units) + ($35/unit x 56 units)] - List of abutting landowners - Draft Pedestrian Path Easement Deed Water allocation - Preliminary wastewater allocation - Shared parking analysis - Landscape Estimate - Color rendering - Trash & recycling building elevations - Parking garage layout - Civil plans and details (sheets 1-9, L, & PL1) We look forward to reviewing this application with the Development Review Board. Please contact our office with any questions. SincerelY7 Andrew owe P.E. c: Chris Snyder ray From: Terry Francis Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:06 PM To: ray Subject: 27 Green Mountain Dr. project Ray: We have had the opportunity to meet with the client on this project at the TRC and have addressed access and fire protection with them. We do not see any significant issues with the project at this time. DC Terence Francis, CFI Fire Marshal South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4134 Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:38 AM To: ray Subject: FW: landscape plans From: Craig Lambert Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:38 AM To: Justin Rabidoux Subject: landscape plans Justin, The final landscape plan for 25 &27 green Mountain Dr. is acceptable. There is no landscaping plan to comment on for the Imported Car Center and Marine Collection. Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clambert(cDsburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. 1 al years: Highway/ Fire Department, Lnce Police Depart- .ecreation and Parks, [on Paths, Road and lk Improvements, ;tration, City Center, )werAntenna; Sewer, rtnwater. )posed Capital Im- ent Program amend- Till be available for June 18, 2015 online )url.com) and in the 1 in the Clerk's Office )onset Street, South on, Vermont. ,ak, ...air 2015 OSSWORD OLUTION WUOKU OLUTION PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday July 7, 2015 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following: Reopened final plat application #SD-15-02 of Halvorsen Develop- ment to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of: 1) a 9,356 sq. ft. 275 seat standard restaurant, 2) a 71 room hotel (Comfort Suites), and 3) an 89 room hotel. The amend- ment consists of; 1) razing the 275 seat restaurant building, 2) constructing 11,242 sq. ft. retail building, and 3) constructing a 10' X 55' detached accessory structure; l Dorset Street. Final plat application#SD-15-18 of Snyder Residential 'Building Company, LLC for a planned unit development on two (2) parcels totaling 13.25 acres with lot #1 developed with a 55,230 sq. ft. gen- eral office building. The project consists of: 1) resubdividing lot #2 to increase its size to'10.12 acres, 2) decreasing the size of lot #1 to 3.13 acres,' and 3) developing lot#1 with a four (4) story65 unit multi -family dwelling, 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive. Conditional use application #CU-15-03 of Super -Temp Realty, Company, Inc. for after -the -fact approval to amend a previously approved plan for a 27,500 sq, ft. light manufacturing facility. The amendment consists of installing a 2.5 ft. vent stack requiring a height waiver, 104 Bowdon Street. Final plat application #SD-15-19'of SouthVillage Communities;` LLC to amend a previously approved planned unit development of Phase 11 consisting of 99 residential units of a 334 residential unit project. The amendment is to reduce the required front yard setback from 10 ft. to five (5) feet, Preserve Road. Tim Barritt, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall:; Participation in the local proceeding is a prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal. June 18, 2015 anct replacement or aging voting equipment, most current equip- ment having been paid for with federal money through HAVA; in some instances, parts are no longer even available; who will pay, and for what "generation" of voting systems? comcast.net; mtownsenacuieg. state.vt.us, by phone (8027862- 7404), or at my home (232 Patchen Road), or at Trader Duke's (Satur- day mornings from 8:30 to 9:30 a.m.), or wherever we cross paths. Planning Commission Synopsis CONTINUED FROM PAGE 6 regarding conflicting language as it related to density. For the Central District, commissioners discussed Strategy #90 related to a public green or square on Market Street Staffrecommended incorporating criteria from a pre- vious discussion. Commission discussed two Energy Committee recommendations, one being a broad statement recommenda- tion and the other regarding solid waste management. Staff also included Strategy #16 in regards to the branding identity project. Report on Sustainable Agricul- ture Subcommittee tasks, Jessica Louisos & Sophie Quest; Com- mission discussion and possible recommendations Before this meeting, Louisos and Quest went through the Staff Review Committee matrix with all the tasks from various committees and honed in on the Sustainable Agriculture sub- committee tasks. Louisos and Quest.presented the tasks they felt would be best charged by the planning commission (marked with Louisos' name). The remain- ing tasks will be left up to the city council. Councilor Tom Chitten- den reminded the commission of otherpapervt.com the city councils concerns shared at the May joint meeting regard- ing the subcommittee's future. Louisos said these steps will help define the subcommittee's tasks and bring it -closer to fully wrap- ping up its work and disbanding. Other Business Conner reminded commissioners whose terms are finishing up to reapply soon. 44, Minutes Gagnon moved to approve the minutes of May26, Quest second- ed, and the vote was unanimously in favor. Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Alembers present. Chair Jessica Louisos, Clerk Gretchen Calcagni,-'' Ted Riehle, Barbara Benton, So- phie Quest, and Bernie Gagnon Staff present: Director of Planning and Zoning Paul Connerand City Planner Cathyann LaRose Others present. Councilor Tom Chittenden, Jennifer Koch, John Simson, Rosanne Greco, Sarah Dopp, and Tyler Bames . PEDESTRIAN PATH EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BARRY MOSSMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST, with a principal office in Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont ("Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to it paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont ("Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY, AND CONFIRM unto Grantee, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for using and maintaining a pedestrian pathway for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Easement") described as follows, viz: Being a non-exclusive easement for the construction, operation, use, maintenance, repair and replacement of a Pedestrian Path depicted as "Proposed 30' Wide Pedestrian Easement to City of South Burlington Along Westerly Boundary of Lot 2 in Same Location as the Existing Utility Easement" on a plat entitled: "Lands of Barry Mossman, Trustee of the Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc., Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, 25 Green Mountain Dr., South Burlington, VT," prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 6, 2014, last revised March 27, 2015 and recorded in Map Slide — of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). By its recording of this Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantor lying outside the scope of this easement and right of way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hereunder, shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold Grantor and its successors and assigns harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right of way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this Deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor and its successors and assigns shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of so much of its property as is encumbered hereby, such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said easement and right of way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement areas which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to use said easement and right of way. The Easement is a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Grantor by Warranty Deed of IDX System Corporation dated November 29, 2010 and recorded in Volume 976 at Page 225 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Easement is also subject to: (a) City of South Burlington Development Review Board Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order dated ; (b) State of Vermont Certification of Compliance #4C0094-2, dated October 13, 1982, as amended by Certification of Compliance #4C0094-2A, dated November 29, 1982; (c) State of Vermont Land Use Permit #4C0094-1, dated October 30, 1978, as amended by #4C0094-2, dated October 13, 1982 and recorded in Volume 186 at Page 5, #4C0094-2A, dated December 10, 1982, recorded in Volume 186 at Page 189, #4C0094-2B, dated March 16, 1983 and recorded in Volume 186 at Page 451, #4C0094-2C, dated May 31, 1984 and recorded in Volume 201 at Page 343, and #4C0094-2D, dated November 18, 1988 and recorded in Volume 272 at Page 340 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; (d) State of Vermont Subdivision Permit #4C0094-2C, dated February 25, 1999 and recorded in Volume 449 at Page 237 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and (e) all easements and rights of way of record, not meaning to reinstate any claims barred by operation of the Vermont Marketable Record Title Act, 27 V.S.A. § 601-611, both inclusive. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans and deeds and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said granted Easement, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereto, to the Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; and Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with Grantee, and its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, Grantor is the sole owner of the Easement, and has good right and title to convey the same in the manner aforesaid, that the said Easement are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE, except as aforementioned; and it hereby engages to WARRANT and DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforementioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BARRY MOSSMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST, has set its hand and seal by its Duly Authorized Agent this day of 2015. STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST Barry Mossman, Trustee STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. On this day of , 2015 personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of BARRY MOSSMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of THE STONEHENGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST. �100457&]/JOP> Before me, Notary Public Print name: Notary commission issued in Chittenden County My commission expires: 2/10/19 Final Plan Application 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Abutter List MDT Partnership, LLP 1650 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Kurt & Laura Reichelt Kurt V. Reichelt Rev. Trust 163 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 City of South Burlington C/o Planning & Zoning Dept 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Heritage Automotive Group, Inc. 1580 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Lark Inns, LP 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert Berman, LLC 35 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 UVM-Campus Planning Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405 Flo south ur!i; <,t' Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 06/19/15 Comments Due: June 30, 2015 Project Description/Meeting Date: Final plat application #SD-15-18 of Snyder Residential Building Company, LLC for a planned unit development on two (2) parcels totaling 13.25 acres with lot #1 developed with a 55,230 sq. ft. general office building. The project consists of: 1) resubdividing lot #2 to increase its size to 10.12 acres, 2) decreasing the size of lot #1 to 3.13 acres, and 3) developing lot #1 with a four (4) story 65 unit multi -family dwelling, 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive. Other Notes: Meeting date is 7/07/15 south'.c�� Plan Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 06/19/15 Comments Due: June 30, 2015 Project Description/Meeting Date: Final plat application #SD-15-18 of Snyder Residential Building Company, LLC for a planned unit development on two (2) parcels totaling 13.25 acres with lot #1 developed with a 55,230 sq. ft. general office building. The project consists of: 1) resubdividing lot #2 to increase its size to 10.12 acres, 2) decreasing the size of lot #1 to 3.13 acres, and 3) developing lot #1 with a four (4) story 65 unit multi -family dwelling, 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive. Other Notes: Meeting date is 7/07/15 •.VERMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Drinldng Water and Groundwater Protection Division Essex Regional Office u1 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 www.septic.vt.gov June 9, 2015 Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. c/o Barry Mossman One Lawson Lane Burlington VT 05401 Agency of Natural Resources [Phone] 802-879-5656 [fax] 802-879-3871 RE: WW-4-1320-1, proposed sixty five unit residential building with thirty seven (one bedroom) units and twenty eight (two bedroom) units on Lot #i and a boundary adjustment between Lots #1 and #2 located at 27 Green Mountain Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above -referenced project on June 5, 2015, including a fee of $9,500.00 paid by check #192921. Under the performance standards for this program, we will have a maximum of 45 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 in-house days, please contact this office. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. If you submitted your application electronically through eDEC, your consultant will need to upload any revisions and send an email to Ernestine Chevrier and the reviewer notifying us that you have resubmitted information. This email should reference both the eDEC number and the WW number for the project. For the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division , J Epwow Ernestine Chevrier Regional Office Coordinator cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Andrew Rowe/Lamoureux & Dickinson Regional Offices — Barre/EssexJct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury O 40001_ _ a t� 4 4 � 5- � A �0 State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Waste Management & Prevention Division i National Life Drive — Davis i Montpelier, VT 05620-3704 (802) 461-6918 Icristi.herzer@state.vt.us The Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. c/o Barry Mossman 1 Lawson Lane Burlington, VT 054010 RE: 27 Green Mountain Drive; Site #2015-4572; FIRST LETTER Dear Mr. Mossman: AA - AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES March 26, 2015 The Sites Management Section (SMS) has reviewed the Proposed Residential Development Letter dated August 20, 2014, by Waite-Heindel Environmental Management, LLC for 27 Green Mountain Drive property in South Burlington. The SMS has also reviewed results from additional soil sampling, presented in Table 1 Soil Quality Data: PAHs. Additionally, the SMS has reviewed pertinent information and reports in the site file for the previous site designation (25 Green Mountain Drive SMS Site #2010-4062) which received a Site Management Activity Completed (SMAC) letter in November 2010. The Proposed Residential Development Letter was prepared for the purpose of notifying VT DEC in anticipation of a proposed change in land use and subsurface work, required by both the SMAC letter as well as the Notice to Land Records filed November 2, 2010. Due to the proposed change in land use from industrial to residential, data presented in the Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment, Corrective Action Plan Implementation Report, and Table 1 Soil Quality Data: PAHs indicate the existence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in surface soil in excess of residential Vermont Soil Screening Values (SSV). Therefore, the SMS has placed the property on the State's Hazardous Sites List. The SMS has assigned a site number to the property for tracking purposes - SMS Site #2015-4572. As stated in 10 V.S.A. Section 6615b (Corrective Action Procedures), upon notification of a release the onus is on the responsible party to take action to mitigate the effects of the release. The submission of the above referenced report(s) is considered notification of a release, and this "first letter" represents the initiation of the process necessary to characterize and remediate the site. Based on the information contained in these reports, the SMS requests that you engage an environmental consultant to develop a corrective action plan (CAP) and soil management plan for PAHs in surface soils. The plan shall include post -corrective action confirmation sampling to document that affected soil has been adequately addressed. The SMS concurs with your plan as per an electronic communication to VT DEC on January 12, 2015 to treat the top two feet (2') of soil as exceeding residential soil screening values (SSV) for PAHs. The SMS is requesting that the following be included in the next phase of work at the site: In compliance with Investigation and Remediation of Contaminated Properties Procedure (IROCP) prepare a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for future development of the property. Soil management should be included as part of the CAP. Post -corrective action confirmation sampling of soils greater than 2' below grade. OVERT Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury 27 Green Mountain Drive; Site 42015-4572 March 26, 2015 Page 2 Please have your consultant submit a preliminary work plan within fifteen days of your receipt of this letter, so it may be approved prior to the initiation of onsite work. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. I may be reached at kristi.herzer0state.vt.us or (802)461-6918. Sincerely, Kristi Herzer, Project Manager Sites Management Section CC: Miles Waite, Waite-Heindel Environmental Management (via electronic mail) South Burlington City Manager (via electronic mail) South Burlington Selectboard c/o City Clerk (via electronic mail) South Burlington Health Officer (via electronic mail) DEC Regional Office, Essex (via electronic mail) Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury south _ Ell PLANNING & ZONING February 9, 2015 Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 Re: Preliminary Plat Approval #SD-14-34 — 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Dear Mr. Rowe: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact & Decision on the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on February 9, 2015. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat review application be submitted within 12 months of this decision. If you have any questions, please contact me. Since ly, l� - Raymond 1. Belai Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT: 7010 0290 0000 2215 6560 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com ii� iii�pm ii m silmiwit Phom (802) 864-4361 Fax. (802) 864-0435 v,,ww,sborLcom February 10, 2015 Mr. Andrew Rowe, P.E. Lamoreux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: 27 Green Mountain Drive, SD-14-34, South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Rowe, In response to your request as to the capability of the South Burlington water distribution system to supply water to the above referenced project we submit the following Preliminary Allocation Determination: 1. Sufficient water storage and capacity is located at the South Burlington West Tanks located off Allen Road in South Burlington, 2. Based upon your final allocation request, a water service connection fee and allocation fee shall be applied to this project according to the City Water Ordinance Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified at any time by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council. 3. Your water supply requirement for this proposed project of 12,555 gpd and can be furnished by this Department without restricting or encumbering present South Burlington water customers. 4. You are also required to contact the Champlain Water District (CWD) in order that they verify supply, treatment, and transmission capability as the wholesale water supplier for the South Burlington Water Department. 5. Any significant increase in current demand or any change in use will require water allocation re -approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 6, Water is supplied to the referenced area through 8" distribution mains. 7. Preliminary Allocation Determination shall not constitute a binding commitment of capacity to the applicant and may be revoked by the Superintendent before a final allocation of capacity is granted if uncommitted reserve capacity ceases to be available. A preliminary determination may be used by the applicant that a proposed development has sufficient water capacity available to proceed through the development process. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me, Sincerely, South Burlington Water Department John Tymecki (via email) J. Fay D. Pratt J. Rabidoux P. Connor R. Belair a South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-846-4110 December 31, 2014 Mr. Ray Belair, Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Proposed Multi -Family Dwelling 25-27 Green Mountain Drive Dear Ray: We have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of a new multi -family residential building at 25 — 27 Green Mountain Drive. We have the following recommendations: 1. Multifamily units will need fire protection plan review from the South Burlington Fire Marshal's office to review for compliance with the Vermont Fire and Building Safety Codes. 2. Provide 2 additional fire hydrants for the project. 3. Trees, fences and floral outcroppings should be placed so as not to interfere with the deployment of the aerial ladder, hoselines, portable ladders and other firefighting equipment. 4. Turning radii and road widths within this property should be sized to allow for entry, exit, parking, set-up and operation fire apparatus. This may involve modification of some of the current parking patterns. At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Douglas S. Brent Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief ray From: Tom Dipietro Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:20 AM To: Andrew Rowe; ray Cc: Justin Rabidoux; Chris Snyder Subject: RE: Comments on 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Project Thanks Andy. Ray —All my questions/comments have been satisfactorily addressed. -Tom Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works City of South Burlington Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all a -mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Andrew Rowe [mailto:andy@ldengineering.comj Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 9:36 AM To: Tom Dipietro; ray Cc: Justin Rabidoux; Chris Snyder Subject: RE: Comments on 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Project HiTom — Thank you for emailing your comments. Below are responses: 1. Understood —a State Stormwater Permit will be required. 2. Understood — coverage under the State Construction General Permit will be required. 3. Waite-Heindel is coordinating with the State on this issue. In 2010, corrective action was taken to address the presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on the project site, after which a Site Management Activity Completion letter was issued. However, with the proposed change in use (with the addition of the residential use) Waite-Heindel has proposed to manage the soil with the assumption that the PAH levels are in exceedence of residential RSLs in the upper (0-1 ft) layer, and that PAHs are not present in the lower (>1 ft) layer and can be treated as clean soil. Soil sampling data from 2010 provide good evidence that the PAHs exceedences are constrained to the upper 1 ft of soil. The upper 1 foot of soil excavated on the site will be stockpiled and re -used onsite for backfill around the building and parking lot extension. Since the upper 1 foot of material will be removed in the infiltration areas, the use of infiltration for stormwater management will not mobilize soil contamination. Let me know if you would like me to forward correspondence from Waite-Heindel. 4. This fall the drywells near the parking area to be reconstructed were inspected and appear to be functioning adequately. The drywells adjacent to the area of construction are not interconnected by pipes. The drywell north of the parking/access drive overflows to a shallow grass Swale that flows westerly. Our intent was to maintain the same, or less, impervious surface draining to each of the three drywells. The total area (including non -impervious) draining to the drywells will be reduced since the wooded area to the east to be developed will ray From: Andrew Rowe <andy@ldengineering.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 9:36 AM To: Tom Dipietro; ray Cc: Justin Rabidoux; Chris Snyder Subject: RE: Comments on 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Project Hi Tom — Thank you for emailing your comments. Below are responses: 1. Understood —a State Stormwater Permit will be required. 2. Understood — coverage under the State Construction General Permit will be required. 3. Waite-Heindel is coordinating with the State on this issue. In 2010, corrective action was taken to address the presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on the project site, after which a Site Management Activity Completion letter was issued. However, with the proposed change in use (with the addition of the residential use) Waite-Heindel has proposed to manage the soil with the assumption that the PAH levels are in exceedence of residential RSLs in the upper (0-1 ft) layer, and that PAHs are not present in the lower (>1 ft) layer and can be treated as clean soil. Soil sampling data from 2010 provide good evidence that the PAHs exceedences are constrained to the upper 1 ft of soil. The upper 1 foot of soil excavated on the site will be stockpiled and re -used onsite for backfill around the building and parking lot extension. Since the upper 1 foot of material will be removed in the infiltration areas, the use of infiltration for stormwater management will not mobilize soil contamination. Let me know if you would like me to forward correspondence from Waite-Heindel. 4. This fall the drywells near the parking area to be reconstructed were inspected and appear to be functioning adequately. The drywells adjacent to the area of construction are not interconnected by pipes. The drywell north of the parking/access drive overflows to a shallow grass swale that flows westerly. Our intent was to maintain the same, or less, impervious surface draining to each of the three drywells. The total area (including non -impervious) draining to the drywells will be reduced since the wooded area to the east to be developed will be managed separately. We will check the outfall to Bartlett Brook, and include any maintenance or repair work with the Final Plans. We will provide additional information on the existing condition of the outfall and any maintenance work to you prior to submitting Final Plans. 5. The pretreatment area in the parking lot median will not have curb along the east or west sides. Precast concrete curb sections could be used to stop vehicles, but still allow runoff to enter. 6. The proposed pretreatment meets the requirements of the VSMM. 7. The 12.5 in/hr infiltration rate is conservative. However, this conservative infiltration rate has been used to account for the various factors that will may reduce infiltrative capacity over time (such as fine sediment accumulating on the surface, compacted areas of topsoil, frost, etc). 8. Since all runoff for the expanded parking area and new building will be infiltrated, the peak runoff rate for the 1 year storm event will not exceed the existing peak runoff rate. 9. The infiltration trenches for the rooftop runoff will overflow to the infiltration basin at the southwest corner of the building. The infiltration basin has been oversized, and also includes an overflow catchbasin at the easterly end. 10. Understood — the applicant will be responsible for maintenance of the stormwater management system. 11. Understood Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 878-4450 From: Tom Dipietro [mailto:tdipietro@sburl.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 2:46 PM To: ray Cc: Andy Rowe; Justin Rabidoux Subject: Comments on 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Project Ray, I reviewed plans for the "25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive" project that were prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineer, LLC, dated 11/1/14 with no revision date. I would like to offer the following comments: 1. This project is located in the Bartlett Brook watershed, which is listed as stormwater impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Also, the property is already subject to a State of Vermont stormwater discharge permit (3017-9010.R). Since the project proposes to expand upon the existing impervious area the existing State permit must be revised before construction begins. 2. The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of land. It will therefore require a stormwater construction permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire this permit before starting construction. 3. The project stormwater management narrative indicates that there are areas of contaminated soil on site, but does not specify the location or type of soil contamination. The project also proposes to infiltrate stormwater runoff. Does the proposed stormwater infiltration increase the chances of mobilizing soil contamination onto adjacent properties or into adjacent surface waters? 4. The existing parking area to be reconstructed will utilize existing drywells and piping for infiltration and conveyance of runoff. During large storm events water would be conveyed to an existing discharge point at the west end of the site. What is the condition of this existing drywells, piping, and outfall? Are the existing drywells functioning as intended? Have the drywells and outfall been maintained? The applicant should be aware that these areas will be inspected to ensure their proper operation prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 5. Will the stormwater pre-treatment area in the parking lot median contain curb cuts to allow water into this area or is there no curb along the front of these parking stalls? If there is no curb, the applicant may want to consider adding measures to prevent vehicles from accidentally pulling forward into and damaging the pretreatment area. 6. The applicant should confirm that the pretreatment provided meets requirements of the 2002 Vermont Stormwater Management Manual (VSMM). 7. Hydrologic modeling utilizes a 12.5 in/hr infiltration rate for the infiltration trench and basin. The applicant should confirm that this is a reasonable (if not conservative) rate based on infiltration testing and/or soil testing conducted on site? 8. The project is located in the City's Stormwater Management Overlay district and must therefore meet the requirements in section 12.03 of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs). a. The applicant must confirm that the post construction peak runoff rate for the 1yr, 24hr storm event does not exceed the existing peak runoff rate for the same storm event. 9. The applicant must confirm that the infiltration basin meets design requirements of the VSMM. For example, an emergency spillway is not visible in the project plans. 10. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. 11. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to provide record drawings per the requirements of section 12.03F. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Since the DRB hearing is only a week away (1/6/14) I've copied the project engineer onto this email. -Tom Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works 104 Landfill Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 658-7961 x108 Email: Tdipietro@sburl.com Web Site: www.sburl.com Twitter: @SBPubWorks Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. Proposed Multi -Family Building 25 &t 27 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington November, 2014 Stormwater Management Narrative Existing Conditions The project consists of existing parcels located at 25 Et 27 Green Mountain Drive. A commercial office building and related site improvements are located at 25 Green Mountain Drive, The 178 existing parking spaces for the office building extend onto the westerly portion of the 27 Green Mountain Drive parcel, which is otherwise undeveloped and wooded. The project is located at the divide between two watersheds, each draining directly into Lake Champlain. The northerly portion of the project draining to the stormwater collection system on Green Mountain Drive is located in the North Brook. The southerly portion of the project drains directly to Bartlett Brook, which flows through the adjacent City owned parcel. The existing stormwater management system consists of drywells, grass swales, and a piped collection system discharging directly to Bartlett Brook. A grass swale along the entry drive flows to a catchbasin connected to the stormwater collection system on Green Mountain Drive. There are several drywells located in the paved parking areas. Drywell overflow pipes are connected to catchbasins along the drive leading to the existing building's loading area. The piped collection system extends south across the City owned parcel, discharging directly to Bartlett Brook. Soil Conditions Soils on the project parcels are primarily mapped as Adams Windsor loamy sand, with varying slopes. Steep slopes are located along the southerly boundary at the transition to the Bartlett Brook corridor. Soil augers were performed by Lamoureux Et Dickinson in October 2014 to verify the soil characteristics, as well as determine the depth to seasonal high groundwater in the area of the proposed construction at 27 Green Mountain Drive. The soil augers revealed loamy fine sand, with a few layers of fine sand. Auger depths ranged from 6 feet to 10 feet. Evidence of seasonal high groundwater ranged from 4 feet to 10 feet. The greater depths to seasonal high groundwater were generally on the southerly portion of the site, adjacent to the steep slope transition to the Bartlett Brook corridor. There are areas of contaminated soil on the site, a result of the prior land uses. Prior remediation activities have largely addressed the areas of contamination. However, there is the potential for some contamination above residential regional screening levels in the uppermost soil layer (0-1 foot depth). Waite-Heindel Environmental Management has completed an evaluation of the site and has proposed a soil management work plan for the proposed construction activity. inLamoureux Et Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Page 1 of 2 Proposed Stormwater Management System Stormwater runoff from the existing parking areas to be reconstructed will continue to flow to existing drywells. Drywells located at the north and south limits of the existing parking area will remain, and receive runoff from the same or smaller drainage areas. The existing drywells will be protected from sediment during construction. The proposed multi -family building layout has been designed to take advantage of shared parking with the office building. Although a portion of the existing parking area will be reconstructed and expanded, the surface parking only increases from 178 spaces to 179 spaces. A parking garage will be located on the lower level of the new multi -family building. The rooftop runoff from the new building will be collected in gutters and piped directly to an infiltration trench along the easterly and southerly sides of the new building. This infiltration trench has been designed to accommodate the 10 year design storm. The rim elevation of the catchbasin at the westerly end of the infiltration trench will allow excess runoff from larger storms to be diverted to the infiltration basin. Runoff from the easternmost parking spaces, drive, and sidewalk will sheetflow to a pretreatment area in the median island. The landscaped depressed median island will allow for infiltration, with excess runoff being piped to the infiltration basin. Runoff from the drive and sidewalk along the north and south edges of the parking area adjacent to the multi -family building will be collected in catchbasins and piped to the infiltration basin. Runoff from the trash/recycling building and adjacent parking will flow through grass swales to the infiltration basin. The infiltration basin includes a pretreatment area at the inlet pipe. The pretreatment area is about 18 inches deep, and will overflow into the infiltration basin for storms larger than the water quality event (0.9" of precipitation). The infiltration basin has been designed to store and infiltrate all runoff from storms up to the 25 year storm event. If the ponding depth in the infiltration basin exceeds 30", an overflow catchbasin will provide relief. From the overflow catchbasin, flow is piped down the steep slope to a stone swale leading to Bartlett Brook. P:\2014\14001\Stormwater\stormwater narrative 11-11-14.wpd inLamoureux bt Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Page 2 of 2 J ( I CURB ., k .tSrE Vhy END DEPRESSED CO. .ETE CURB CSI.RMWATER PRETREATMENT AR TYPICAL RAMP WITH CAST IRON wr OR mi s r t f� 1� it7 t r ��= "^r ! rr r $� �'� rt�•t�.t !Y `!�i",`W4. �V��+�,1 -� i,. �� e • �$���,�i b sir E � ty"`',.y i;p S � ��r� 1�.�� 1� 8-ee��aa,, ''(lY1Y t Ei tt�,.r�9a 7ktlr rtl R / 22 / // 1/� / i STORMWATER q1 NN / PRETREATMENTAIEA— / SR till R/ OOW 27 Green Mountain Drive November 2014 Multi -family building - ROOFTOP Pretreatment provided: No pretreatment required. Rooftop runoff collected in gutters and piped directly to infiltration trench (no commingling with non -rooftop runoff) Water Quality Volume Entire WQv infiltrated in infiltration trench Recharge volume Entire WQv infiltrated in infiltration trench Channel Protection Volume Entire CPv infiltrated in infiltration trench Overbank Flood Protection Runoff from the 10 year storm is infiltrated in the trench Extreme Flood Protection Not applicable - less than 10 acres of impervious surface Multi -family building - NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE Pretreatment provided: Drainage area 2S: 295 CF provided in depressed median island 847 CF provided in sump at inlet pipe to infiltration basin Drainage area 3S: Grass channels on each side of the parking area flow south to the infiltration basin Water Quality Volume Entire WQv infiltrated in infiltration basin. Recharge volume Entire WQv infiltrated in infiltration basin. Channel Protection Volume Entire CPv infiltrated in infiltration basin. Overbank Flood Protection Runoff from the 10 year storm is infiltrated in the basin. Extreme Flood Protection Not applicable - less than 10 acres of impervious surface PA2014\14001\Stormwater1WQv summary.wpd Version: 9/06 t WQv Combined.xts For the area draining to*: Infiltration basin Located in drainage area for S/N: 001 WQ Volume Calculation for Volume -Based Practice Use this worksheet to calculate the water quality volume draining to your volume based STP if you are not using any of the site design credits in section 3 of the 2002 VSWMM. Do not use this worksheet to calculate your WQv if you need to determine the Peak Q for the WQ storm (i.e. designing a grass channel, flow-splitter or other flow based practice). Seethe worksheet "Water Quality Volume and Modified Curve Number Calculation for Water Quality Treatment in a Flow -Based Practice" Water Quality Volume Calculations Line value/calculation units 1 Site Area (impervious +disturbed pervious) A-- 0,55 Notes: 1: Sites with low impervious cover ( -19%) but that do not employ a significant use of the stormwater design credits in Section 3 of the VSWMM are required to treat the minimum water quality volume of 0.2 watershed inches. Sites that have a significant portion of their impervious cover addressed via the stormwater credits (section 3 of the VSWMM) will be able to reduce this WQv and will only be required to treat the volume calculated on the "WQ Volume (with credit reduction)" worksheet which will be less than the 0.2 watershed inches. * Enter the name of the STP (both type and label) which has been designed to treat this particular WQv (e.g. Wet Pond #2) 1��rA N(av rrR L ^� ' t J p'('1AC- is Ro ftop 1P Infilt trench Subcat Reach Pon Link (2S) Lg Parki g 3S S Parking 4P I nfilt basin IrA 27 Green Mtn Dr Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.640 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A (2S, 3S) 0.420 98 Pavement & sidewalk (2S, 3S) 0.610 98 Rooftop (1S) 27 Green Mtn Dr Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: Rooftop [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.80 cfs @ 11.89 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Depth= 0.69" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (ac) CN Description 0.610 98 Rooftop 0.610 98 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.2 35 0,2500 2.60 Sheet Flow, Rooftop Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Lg Parking [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.38 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.019 af, Depth= 0.40" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (ac) CN Description 0.320 98 Pavement & sidewalk 0.230 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.550 73 Weighted Average 0.230 39 41.82% Pervious Area 0.320 98 58.18% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.8 25 0.0500 0.11 Sheet Flow, Overland to pave Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 175 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Gutter flow Paved Kv= 20.3 fos 4.4 200 Total Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Sm Parking [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.13 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" 27 Green Mtn Dr Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 0 2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Area (ac) CN Description 0.100 98 Pavement & sidewalk 0.410 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.510 51 Weighted Average 0.410 39 80.39% Pervious Area 0.100 98 19.61% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.2 60 0.0030 0.82 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grass swale Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Summary for Pond 1 P: Infilt trench Inflow Area = 0.610 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.69" for WQv event Inflow = 0.80 cfs @ 11.89 hrs, Volume= 0.035 of Outflow = 0.60 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Atten= 25%, Lag= 3.6 min Discarded = 0.60 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.035 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of LL- R�(� Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 3 Peak Elev= 214.10' @ 11.93 hrs Surf.Area= 0.046 ac Storage= 0.001 of Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 0.4 min ( 783.2 - 782.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 214.00' 0.024 of 5.00'W x 400.001 x 2.00'H Stone 0.092 of Overall - 0.011 of Embedded = 0.081 of x 30.0% Voids #2 214.50' 0.011 of 15.0" D x 400.0'L Pipe Storage Inside #1 0.035 of Total Available Storage Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 214.00' 12.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 210.90' #2 Primary 217.00' 24.0" x 24.0" Horiz. Grate overflow C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Discarded OutFlow Max=0.60 cfs @ 11.95 hrs HW=214.09' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.60 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=214.00' (Free Discharge) L2=Grate overflow ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 27 Green Mtn Dr Type // 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 02009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Summary for Pond 41P: Infilt basin Inflow Area = 1.670 ac, 61.68% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.17" for WQv event Inflow = 0.49 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.024 of Outflow = 0.46 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.024 af, Atten= 6%, Lag= 1.0 min Discarded = 0.46 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.024 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 212.01' @ 11.95 hrs Surf.Area= 2,764 sf Storage= 40 cf C F'0-,TPr'1 13 � 10 I = Z, oc, Plug -Flow detention time= 1.4 min calculated for 0.024 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 1.4 min ( 787.4 - 786.0) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 212.00' 9,599 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 212.00 2,753 196.0 0 0 2,753 213.00 3,589 221.0 3,162 3,162 3,608 214.00 4,526 246.0 4,048 7,210 4,566 214.50 5,032 259.0 2,388 9,599 5,104 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 212.00' 12.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 209.00' Discarded OutFlow Max=0.80 cfs @ 11.95 hrs HW=212.01' (Free Discharge) t-1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.80 cfs) 27 Green Mtn Dr Type // 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Rooftop [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 2.01 cfs @ 11.89 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Depth= 1.87" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.10" Area (ac) CN Description 0.610 98 Rooftop 0.610 98 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.2 35 0.2500 2.60 Sheet Flow, Rooftop Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Lg Parking [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.97 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.050 af, Depth= 1.09" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.10" Area (ac) CN Description 0.320 98 Pavement & sidewalk 0.230 39 >75% Grass cover, Good. HSG A 0.550 73 Weighted Average 0.230 39 41.82% Pervious Area 0.320 98 58.18% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.8 25 0.0500 0.11 Sheet Flow, Overland to pave Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 175 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Gutter flow Paved Kv= 20.3 fqs 4.4 200 Total Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Sm Parking [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.32 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.016 af, Depth= 0.37" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.10" 27 Green Mtn Dr Type/1 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD0 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Area (ac) CN Description 0.100 98 Pavement & sidewalk 0.410 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.510 51 Weighted Average 0.410 39 80.39% Pervious Area 0.100 98 19.61% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.2 60 0.0030 0.82 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grass swale Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Summary for Pond 1 P: Infilt trench Inflow Area = 0.610 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.87" for 1 year event Inflow = 2.01 cfs @ 11.89 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Outflow = 0.76 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Atten= 62%, Lag= 5.6 min Discarded = 0.76 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of i) �-� 2oo<=i �P �r�NaFr✓ Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 3 D Peak Elev= 214.96' @ 11.98 hrs Surf.Area= 0.046 ac Storage= 0.016 of Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 3.8 min ( 760.9 - 757.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 214.00' 0.024 of 5.00'W x 400.00'L x 2.00'H Stone 0.092 of Overall - 0.011 of Embedded = 0.081 of x 30.0% Voids #2 214.50' 0.011 of 15.0" D x 400.0'L Pipe Storage Inside #1 0.035 of Total Available Storage Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 214.00' 12.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 210.90' #2 Primary 217.00' 24.0" x 24.0" Horiz. Grate overflow C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Discarded OutFlow Max=0.76 cfs @ 11.98 hrs HW=214.94' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.76 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=214.00' (Free Discharge) L2=Grate overflow ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 27 Green Mtn Dr Type 1124-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.10' Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Pond 4P: Infilt basin Inflow Area = 1.670 ac, 61.68% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.47" for 1 year event Inflow = 1.24 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.066 of Outflow = 0.83 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.066 af, Atten= 33%, Lag= 4.0 min Discarded = 0.83 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.066 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 212.07' @ 12.00 hrs Surf.Area= 2,811 sf Storage= 204 cf gal R1�;t� I Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 1.7 min ( 762.0 - 760.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 212.00' 9,599 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 212.00 2,753 196.0 0 0 2,753 213.00 3,589 221.0 3,162 3,162 3,608 214.00 4,526 246.0 4,048 7,210 4,566 214.50 5,032 259.0 2,388 9,599 5,104 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 212.00' 12.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 209.00' Discarded OutFlow Max=0.83 cfs @ 12.00 hrs HW=212.07' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.83 cfs) 27 Green Mtn Dr Type 1124-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 © 2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: Rooftop [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 2.21 cfs @ 11.89 hrs, Volume= 0.105 af, Depth= 2.07" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.30" Area (ac) CN Description 0.610 98 Rooftop 0.610 98 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.2 35 0.2500 2.60 Sheet Flow, Rooftop Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Lg Parking [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 1.06 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.055 af, Depth= 1.21" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.30" Area (ac) CN Description 0.320 98 Pavement & sidewalk 0.230 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.550 73 Weighted Average 0.230 39 41.82% Pervious Area 0.320 98 58.18% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.8 25 0.0500 0.11 Sheet Flow, Overland to pave Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 175 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Gutter flow Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 4.4 200 Total Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Sm Parking [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.35 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.017 af, Depth= 0.41" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.30" 27 Green Mtn Dr Type 11 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Area (ac) CN Description 0.100 98 Pavement & sidewalk 0.410 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.510 51 Weighted Average 0.410 39 80.39% Pervious Area 0.100 98 19.61% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.2 60 0.0030 0.82 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grass swale Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Summary for Pond 1 P: Infilt trench Inflow Area = 0.610 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.07" for 2 year event Inflow = 2.21 cfs @ 11.89 hrs, Volume= 0.105 of Outflow = 0.78 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume= 0.105 af, Atten= 65%, Lag= 5.9 min Discarded = 0.78 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume= 0.105 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of A L-t- Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 3 l N,G1C�T2Ps� Peak Elev= 215.09' @ 11.99 hrs Surf.Area= 0.046 ac Storage= 0.019 of Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 4.4 min ( 759.2 - 754.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 214.00' 0.024 of 5.00'W x 400.001 x 2.00'H Stone 0.092 of Overall - 0.011 of Embedded = 0.081 of x 30.0% Voids #2 214.50' 0.011 of 15.0" D x 400.0'L Pipe Storage Inside #1 0.035 of Total Available Storage Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 214.00' 12.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 210.90' #2 Primary 217.00' 24.0" x 24.0" Horiz. Grate overflow C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Discarded OutFlow Max=0.78 cfs @ 11.99 hrs HW=215.08' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.78 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=214.00' (Free Discharge) t2=Grate overflow ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 27 Green Mtn Dr Type 1124-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 05471 02009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Pond 4P: Infilt basin Inflow Area = 1.670 ac, 61.68% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.52" for 2 year event Inflow = 1.37 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.073 of Outflow = 0.84 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.073 af, Atten= 38%, Lag= 4.5 min Discarded = 0.84 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.073 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 212.10' @ 12.01 hrs Surf.Area= 2,828 sf Storage= 266 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 2.1 min calculated for 0.073 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 2.0 min ( 760.0 - 758.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 212.00' 9,599 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 212.00 2,753 196.0 0 0 2,753 213.00 3,589 221.0 3,162 3,162 3,608 214.00 4,526 246.0 4,048 7,210 4,566 214.50 5,032 259.0 2,388 9,599 5,104 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 212.00' 12.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 209.00' Discarded OutFlow Max=0.84 cfs @ 12.01 hrs HW=212.09' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.84 cfs) 27 Green Mtn Dr Type 1124-hr 10 year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Rooftop [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 3.11 cfs @ 11.89 hrs, Volume= 0.151 af, Depth= 2.97" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=3.20" Area (ac) CN Description 0.610 98 Rooftop 0.610 98 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.2 35 0.2500 2.60 Sheet Flow, Rooftop Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Lg Parking [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 1.49 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.079 af, Depth= 1.73" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=3.20" Area (ac) CN Description 0.320 98 Pavement & sidewalk 0.230 39 >75% Grass cover, Good. HSG A 0.550 73 Weighted Average 0.230 39 41.82% Pervious Area 0.320 98 58.18% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.8 25 0.0500 0.11 Sheet Flow, Overland to pave Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 175 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Gutter flow Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 4.4 200 Total Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Sm Parking [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.50 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.025 af, Depth= 0.58" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=3.20" 27 Green Mtn Dr Type 1124-hr 10 year Rainfafi=3.20" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Area (ac) CN Description 0.100 98 Pavement & sidewalk 0.410 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.510 51 Weighted Average 0.410 39 80.39% Pervious Area 0.100 98 19.61% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.2 60 0.0030 0.82 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grass swale Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Summary for Pond 1 P: Infilt trench Inflow Area = 0.610 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.97" for 10 year event Inflow = 3.11 cfs @ 11.89 hrs, Volume= 0.151 of Outflow = 0.92 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.151 af, Atten= 70%, Lag= 6.6 min Discarded = 0.92 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.151 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of AL u Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 3 Peak Elev= 215.82' @ 12.00 hrs Surf.Area= 0.046 ac Storage= 0.033 of Plug -Flow detention time= 7.6 min calculated for 0.151 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 7.5 min ( 754.6 - 747.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 214.00' 0.024 of 5.00'W x 400.00'L x 2.00'H Stone 0.092 of Overall - 0.011 of Embedded = 0.081 of x 30.0% Voids #2 214.50' 0.011 of 15.0" D x 400.0'L Pipe Storaae Inside #1 0.035 of Total Available Storage Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 214.00' 12.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 210.90' #2 Primary 217.00' 24.0" x 24.0" Horiz. Grate overflow C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Discarded OutFlow Max=0.92 cfs @ 12.00 hrs HW=215.82' (Free Discharge) t1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.92 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=214.00' (Free Discharge) L2=Grate overflow ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 27 Green Mtn Dr Type // 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Pond 4P: Infilt basin Inflow Area = 1.670 ac, 61.68% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.75" for 10 year event Inflow = 1.92 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.104 of Outflow = 0.90 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.104 af, Atten= 53%, Lag= 5.9 min Discarded = 0.90 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.104 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 212.21' @ 12.03 hrs Surf.Area= 2,918 sf Storage= 592 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calcul(ted: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 3.2 min ( 753.6 - 750.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 212.00' 9,599 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area _(feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 212.00 2,753 196.0 0 0 2,753 213.00 3,589 221.0 3,162 3,162 3,608 214.00 4,526 246.0 4,048 7,210 4,566 214.50 5,032 259.0 2,388 9,599 5,104 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 212.00' 12.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 209.00' Discarded OutFlow Max=0.90 cfs @ 12.03 hrs HW=212.21' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.90 cfs) 27 Green Mtn Dr Type 1124-nr 25 year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: Rooftop [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 3.60 cfs @ 11.89 hrs, Volume= 0.176 af, Depth= 3.47" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 year Rainfall=3.70" Area (ac) CN Description 0.610 98 Rooftop 0.610 98 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.2 35 0.2500 2.60 Sheet Flow, Rooftop Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Lg Parking [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 1.73 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.093 af, Depth= 2.02" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 year Rainfall=3.70" Area (ac) CN Description 0.320 98 Pavement & sidewalk 0.230 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.550 73 Weighted Average 0.230 39 41.82% Pervious Area 0.320 98 58.18% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.8 25 0.0500 0.11 Sheet Flow, Overland to pave Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 175 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Gutter flow Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 4.4 200 Total Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Sm Parking [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.58 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.030 af, Depth= 0.70" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr 25 year Rainfall=3.70" 27 Green Mtn Dr Type 1124-hr 25 year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 02009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Area (ac) CN Description 0.100 98 Pavement & sidewalk 0.410 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 0.510 51 Weighted Average 0.410 39 80.39% Pervious Area 0.100 98 19.61% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.2 60 0.0030 0.82 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grass swale Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Summary for Pond 1 P: Infilt trench [93] Warning: Storage range exceeded by 1.10' Inflow Area = 0.610 ac, 100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.47" for 25 year event Inflow = 3.60 cfs @ 11.89 hrs, Volume= 0.176 of Outflow = 1.94 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.175 af, Atten= 46%, Lag= 3.7 min Discarded = 1.16 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.172 of Primary = 0.78 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.003 of t� LLIZ�La� T� Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 3 Peak Elev= 217.10' @ 11.95 hrs Surf.Area= 0.046 ac Storage= 0.035 of Plug -Flow detention time= 12.9 min calculated for 0.175 of (99% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 8.1 min ( 752.2 - 744.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 214.00' 0.024 of 5.00'W x 400.00'L x 2.00'H Stone 0.092 of Overall - 0.011 of Embedded = 0.081 of x 30.0% Voids #2 214.50' 0.011 of 15.0" D x 400.0'L Pipe Storage Inside #1 0.035 of Total Available Storage Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 214.00' 12.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 210.90' #2 Primary 217.00' 24.0" x 24.0" Horiz. Grate overflow C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Discarded OutFlow Max=1.14 cfs @ 11.95 hrs HW=217.01' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration ( Controls 1.14 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.78 cfs @ 11.95 hrs HW=217.10' (Free Discharge) L2=Grate overflow (Weir Controls 0.78 cfs @ 1.01 fps) 27 Green Mtn Dr Type // 24-hr 25 year Rainfall=3.70" Prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Printed 11/11/2014 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 05471 ©2009 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Pond 4P: Infilt basin Inflow Area = 1.670 ac, 61.68% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.90" for 25 year event Inflow = 2.98 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.126 of Outflow = 0.96 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.126 af, Atten= 68%, Lag= 5.7 min Discarded = 0.96 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.126 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-84.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 212.32' @ 12.04 hrs Surf.Area= 3,012 sf Storage= 933 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 4.6 min ( 755.0 - 750.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 212.00' 9,599 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 212.00 2,753 196.0 0 0 2,753 213.00 3,589 221.0 3,162 3,162 3,608 214.00 4,526 246.0 4,048 7,210 4,566 214.50 5,032 259.0 2,388 9,599 5,104 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 212.00' 12.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 209.00' Discarded OutFlow Max=0.96 cfs @ 12.04 hrs HW=212.32' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.96 cfs) ray From: Tom Dipietro Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 2:46 PM To: ray Cc: Andy Rowe; Justin Rabidoux Subject: Comments on 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Project Ray, reviewed plans for the "25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive" project that were prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineer, LLC, dated 11/1/14 with no revision date. I would like to offer the following comments: This project is located in the Bartlett Brook watershed, which is listed as stormwater impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Also, the property is already subject to a State of Vermont stormwater discharge permit (3017-9010.11). Since the project proposes to expand upon the existing impervious area the existing State permit must be revised before construction begins. The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of land. It will therefore require a stormwater construction permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire this permit before starting construction. 3. The project stormwater management narrative indicates that there are areas of contaminated soil on site, but does not specify the location or type of soil contamination. The project also proposes to infiltrate stormwater runoff. Does the proposed stormwater infiltration increase the chances of mobilizing soil contamination onto adjacent properties or into adjacent surface waters? 4. The existing parking area to be reconstructed will utilize existing drywells and piping for infiltration and conveyance of runoff. During large storm events water would be conveyed to an existing discharge point at the west end of the site. What is the condition of this existing drywells, piping, and outfall? Are the existing drywells functioning as intended? Have the drywells and outfall been maintained? The applicant should be aware that these areas will be inspected to ensure their proper operation prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 5. Will the stormwater pre-treatment area in the parking lot median contain curb cuts to allow water into this area or is there no curb along the front of these parking stalls? If there is no curb, the applicant may want to consider adding measures to prevent vehicles from accidentally pulling forward into and damaging the pretreatment area. 6. The applicant should confirm that the pretreatment provided meets requirements of the 2002 Vermont Stormwater Management Manual (VSMM). 7. Hydrologic modeling utilizes a 12.5 in/hr infiltration rate for the infiltration trench and basin. The applicant should confirm that this is a reasonable (if not conservative) rate based on infiltration testing and/or soil testing conducted on site? 8. The project is located in the City's Stormwater Management Overlay district and must therefore meet the requirements in section 12.03 of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs). a. The applicant must confirm that the post construction peak runoff rate for the 1yr, 24hr storm event does not exceed the existing peak runoff rate for the same storm event. 9. The applicant must confirm that the infiltration basin meets design requirements of the VSMM. For example, an emergency spillway is not visible in the project plans. 10. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. 11. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to provide record drawings per the requirements of section 12.03F. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Since the DRB hearing is only a week away (1/6/14) I've copied the project engineer onto this email. -Tom Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works 104 Landfill Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 658-7961 x108 Email: Tdipietro@sburl.com Web Site: www.sburl.com Twitter: @SBPubWorks Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. Permit Number SD- N - 3� (office use only APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑✓ Preliminary ❑Final PUD Being Requested? ❑✓ Yes ❑No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) The Stonehenge Investment Corporation MPPP 1 Lawson Lane Burlinqton, VT 05401 658-0355 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Bk 976, page 225 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) 985-5722 The Snyder Construction Company, LLC csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Andrew Rowe - Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 878-4450 phone 878-3135 fax a. Contact email address: Andy@LDengineering.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor s Office) 0720-00025 & 0720-00027 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): The existing commercial building will remain on Lot 2. A 65 unit multi -family residential building is proposed for Lot 1, as well as associated site and utility iimprovements. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): An existing commercial office building (48,578 sf GFA) and related site improvements are located on Lot 2. Some parking is located on Lot 1 for use on Lot 2 c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): The existing commercial office building (48,578 sf GFA) on Lot 2 will remain. A 65 unit multi -family residential building is proposed on Lot 1. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): The existing commercial office building has a GFA of 48,578 sf. The new residential building has a GFA of 79,110 sf, plus 26,370 sf in the garage. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): The existing office building is 3 stories. The new residential building has a parking garage on the lower level, plus 3 stories of living space. The new building will have a height of 52 feet. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 65 multi -family residential units are proposed for Lot 1. g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 222 employees were previously approved for the office building. No full time employees are proposed for the residential building. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): The project is located in the Stormwater Management Overlay District. i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. An adjustment to the existing property line between Lot 1 and Lot 2 is proposed. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: Proposed Lot 2 - 433,733 (acres /sq. ft.) Lot 1 143,368 sq. ft b. Building Coverage: 0 sq.ft / 0% Existing 18,014 square feet 4.3 Proposed 18,014 square feet 4.2 % 26,695 sq. ft. / 18.6% c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 95,062 square feet 22.9 % 29,010 sq.ft / 18.0 % Proposed 107,584 square feet 24.8 % 58,355 sq.ft / 40.7 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing 720 square feet 9.2 % No frontage on Proposed 870 square feet 11.2 % Green Mountain Drive 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, 1I, or III) on the subject property? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50 buffers (describe) c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City s wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 130,000 SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City s specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 6,050,000 b. Landscaping: $ 48,576 (Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) parking/utilities = $ 450,000 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 42 new peak hour trips (residential) 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 7:30 - 8:30 AM & 4:30 - 5:30 PM 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Frid 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: May 2017 16. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City s Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. j NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowled . AG:N:A-TURE OF APPLICANT y SIGNA' TY OWNER 7r-M6h e Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: QIncomplete 91 t Officer Barry Mossman I PRINT NAME The applicant or perm ittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Subdivision Application Form. Rev, 12-2011 ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:58 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Traffic Impact Study - 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Ray, I have reviewed the referenced study and its technical attachments. I have no concerns and agree with the study's conclusions that the project will not result in unacceptable levels of service nor cause safety concerns. The project building a new sidewalk to connect its building to the road and along its frontage is a welcomed improvement. Justin -----Original Message ----- From: ray Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:59 PM To: Justin Rabidoux Subject: Traffic Impact Study - 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Justin, Would you please review the attached Traffic Impact Study and let me know if you have any concerns or if you recommend that the DRB invoke technical review. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. Plan Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 12/05/14 Comments Due: December 22, 2014 Project Description/Meeting Date: 1. Preliminary plat application #SD-14-34 of The Snyder Construction Company, LLC for a planned unit development on two (2) parcels totaling 13.25 acres with lot #1 developed with a 55,230 sq. ft. general office building. The project consists of: 1) resubdividing lot #1 to increase its size to 9.96 acres, 2) decreasing the size of lot #2 to 3.29 acres, and 3) developing lot #2 with a four (4) story 65 unit multi -family dwelling, 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive. Other Notes: Meeting date is 1/06/15 Plan Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 12/05/14 Comments Due: December 22, 2014 Project Description/Meeting Date: Preliminary plat application #SD-14-34 of The Snyder Construction Company, LLC for a planned unit development on two (2) parcels totaling 13.25 acres with lot #1 developed with a 55,230 sq. ft. general office building. The project consists of: 1) resubdividing lot #1 to increase its size to 9.96 acres, 2) decreasing the size of lot #2 to 3.29 acres, and 3) developing lot #2 with a four (4) story 65 unit multi -family dwelling, 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive. Other Notes: Meeting date is 1/06/15 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 15 tt day of Dec. , 20 14, a copy of the foregoing public notice for preliminary plat [type of application] # SD-14-34 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) MDT Partnership, LLP 1650 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Kurt & Laura Reichelt Kurt V. Reichelt Rev. Trust 163 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 City of South Burlington c/o Planning & Zoning Dept 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Heritage Automotive Group, Inc. 1580 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Lark Inns, LP 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert Berman, LLC 35 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 UVM-Campus Planning Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405 Dated at Essex [town/city], Vermont, this 15th day of December , 2014 Printed Name: Andrew Rowe Phone number and email: 878-4450' A y@LDgNineenng.com Signature: o' Date: necPmber 15, 2014 Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Fornt. Rev. 1-2012 Lamoureux Et Dickinson Engineers Surveyors Planners Wetland & Soil Scientists November 13, 2014 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Preliminary Plan Application Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of The Snyder Construction Company, LLC to request Preliminary Plan review for a proposed planned unit development at 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive. This application involves a total of 13.25 acres, which originally comprised Lot 17 of the National Life subdivision. An existing office building is located at 25 Green Mountain Drive on tax map parcel 0720-00025 (9.55 acres). Tax map parcel 0720-00027 is mostly undeveloped, with only paved parking for the adjacent office building located on the 3.7 acre lot. The Development Review Board reviewed the sketch plan application on June 17. This application proposes a boundary line adjustment and construction of a 65 unit multi -family residential building on the easterly lot. The layout of the multi -family building allows for shared parking with the existing office use. The reconstructed parking area increases the total number of surface parking on the project site by only one space. The parking area will slope up to the main entrance of the new building. The parking garage entrance, located on the north end of the building, is screened by the orientation of the new building and the grade change between the surface parking area and garage. The enclosed shared parking analysis requires a maximum of 282 spaces. A total of 243 surface and garage parking spaces are proposed. Therefore, a 14% parking reduction waiver is requested per Section 13.0l.N.(2) of the Land Development Regulations. The proposed number of parking spaces has been evaluated from the perspective of both the commercial and residential uses. Based upon the current and potential maximum number of employees, as well as the number of bedrooms proposed in the multi -family building, the proposed number of parking spaces is adequate. It should be noted that the multi -family building will have 37 one bedroom units. In addition, this project has the potential to utilize multimodal transportation — as the project is located near many potential employment opportunities, near the CCTA bus route, as well as the potential for carpooling given the location near Route 7. 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802.878.4450 www.LDengineering.com ♦ Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service A concrete sidewalk will link the multi -family building with Green Mountain Drive. The alignment of the new sidewalk meanders through the many existing trees north of the access drive. In addition to the sidewalk, the existing trail loops and connectivity will be maintained. The trail loop east of the new building will connect to the new sidewalk, looping back to the parking lot at the southwest corner of the new building. This 1000' loop will continue to be available for use by the office building employees, as well as the residents. Benches will be placed at several locations along the trail. The trail connection to the Quail Run/Pheasant Way neighborhood will be unaffected. Bike storage will be provided in the parking garage. A total of three stories of living space will be constructed over the parking garage. The main entrance, with access to the elevator, is located near the middle of the building facing the parking lot. A color rendering of the building, as well as elevation drawings (black & white) are enclosed. A height waiver is requested for a maximum building height of 50 feet. The average preconstruction grade is 217.7'. The elevation of the mid -point of the sloped roof is 266.4'. The calculated building height of 49 feet has been rounded to 52 feet for purposes of the height waiver request. We understand that a condition of approval will likely be the recording of a Notice of Condition that both parcels will be treated as a single lot for planning and zoning purposes. An easement plan will be prepared prior to construction, presenting the various easements and reciprocal rights between the two parcels in regards to utilities, access, shared parking, and their related maintenance. The enclosed landscaping plan (sheet 5) presents new plantings, as well as the clearing limits for construction. The project will maintain many mature trees, mostly white pines to the east of the new building. A limited area of understory clearing is proposed just east of the lawn area adjacent to the building. The understory clearing and the lawn area will provide a large secluded area for the resident's use. A common grilling area with picnic tables is located off the northeast corner of the building. Access to this area will be provided from the first floor lobby through an entry at the southeast corner of the building. The value of the proposed landscaping is less than that required by the Land Development Regulations, primarily due to the high building construction cost. Therefore, a landscaping credit is requested for the mature trees to be preserved within the understory clearing area east of the new building. It should be noted that there are many more mature trees that will be preserved further east of the understory clearing area, as well as around the perimeter of the building and parking areas. The project is located in the Bartlett Brook watershed and the Stormwater Management Overlay District. Stormwater management will take advantage of the sandy soils for infiltration. All rooftop runoff will be collected in gutters and piped directly to an infiltration trench along the easterly and southerly sides of the building. Runoff from the new parking areas will be directed to an infiltration basin at the southwest corner of the building. All runoff will be infiltrated onsite for events up to the 25 year design storm (including the 2 year storm requiring evaluation for the Stormwater Management Overlay District). The stormwater management system will be maintained by the building owner. A small building for trash & recycling storage is proposed at the end of the parking lot at the west end of the new residential building. The frequency of trash and recycling pick-up will be adjusted to meet the demand of the residents, but often enough to avoid odors. Lights controlled by motion sensors will be located inside the building and at the access door. Pole mounted LED cut off light fixtures are proposed to illuminate the parking areas adjacent to the new residential building. This includes removal and replacement of two existing pole mounted metal halide light fixtures. A building mounted PED cutoff light fixture will be located at the parking garage entrance. Recessed light fixtures will also be located within the alcove at the main entrance. The light fixture cut sheets and illumination levels are shown on the plans. The following are enclosed for your review: - Application for Subdivision Preliminary Subdivision Plat & PUD Review - $3763.00 application fee ($500 base fee + $13 recording fee + $50/unit x 65 units) - List of abutting landowners - Traffic Impact Assessment - Stormwater Management Narrative - Shared parking analysis - Landscape Estimate - Estimated value of existing trees Color rendering Parking garage layout Civil plans and details We look forward to reviewing this application with the Development Review Board on December 16. Please contact our office with any questions. Sinc el , Andrew Rowe P.E. c: Chris Snyder 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Proposed Parking Summary November, 2014 Parking REQUIRED Per Land Development Regulations Residential / Multi -family 2 spaces per dwelling unit plus 1 space/4 units (garage spaces assigned) 147 spaces required Commercial / Office 3.5 spaces per 1000 sf GFA 170 spaces required (48,578 sf x 3.5 spaces/1000 sf) TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 317 spaces Parkina PROPOSED on Preliminary Plan Residential / Multi -family 64 garage spaces 54 surface spaces 118 spaces TOTAL (1.8 spaces per dwelling unit) Commercial / Office 125 spaces (2.6 spaces per 1000 sf GFA) TOTAL PARKING PROPOSED = 243 spaces Shared parking calculation requires a maximum of 282 spaces (see attached) 14% parking reduction waiver requested per Section 13.01.N.(2) (maximum 25% reduction allowed) Project: 25 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT Project #: 14001 # Req'd Proposed Land -Uses Ratio Spaces General Retail 0 sf 5 0 Office 48,578 sf 3.5 171 Medical/Dental Office 0 sf 5 0 Residential 65 units 2 + vistr 147 Restaurant - Sit Down 0 sf 18 0 Restaurant - High Turnover 0 sf 18 0 Total 318 Lamoureux & Dickinson Shared Parking Calculations Date: October 2014 By: R. Dickinson a.k.a. Fine/Casual a.k.a. Family Sources: South Burlington Land Development Regulations Shared Parking, 2nd Ed., ULI Weekday Shared Use Parking Hourly Ratios 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Retail 1% 5% 15% 30% 55% 75% 90% 100% 100% 100% 95% 85% 80% 75% 65% Office 0% 1% 20% 60% 100% 45% 15% 45% 100% 45% 15% 10% 5% 2% 1% Medical/Dental Office 0% 0% 90% 90% 100% 100% 30% 90% 100% 100% 90% 80% 67% 30% 15% Residential 100% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 70% 70% 70% 75% 85% 90% 97% 98% Restaurant - Sit Down 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 40% 75% 75% 65% 40% 50% 75% 95% 100% 100% Restaurant- High Turnover 1 25% 50% 60% 75% 85% 90% 100% 90% 50% 45% 45% 75% 80% 80% 80% Weekday Required Parking Spaces by Hour 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 General Retail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Offices 0 2 35 103 171 77 26 77 171 77 26 18 9 4 2 Personal Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 147 133 125 118 111 103 96 103 103 103 111 125 133 143 145 Restaurant - Sit Down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Restaurant - High Turnover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total I 147 135 160 221 282 180 122 180 274 180 137 143 142 147 147 Maximum 282 saaces Weekend Shared Use Parking Hourly Ratios 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Retail 1% 5% 10% 35% 60% 70% 85% 95% 100% 100% 95% 90% 80% 75% 65% Office 0% 20% 60% 80% 90% 100% 90% 80% 60% 40% 20% 10% 5% 0% 0% Medical/Dental Office 0% 0% 90% 90% 100% 100% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Residential 100% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 70% 70% 70% 75% 85% 90% 97% 98% Restaurant - Sit Down 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 50% 55% 45% 45% 45% 60% 90% 95% 100% Restaurant - High Turnover 1 10% 25% 45% 70% 90% 90% 100% 85% 65% 40% 45% 60% 70% 70% 65% Weekend Required Parking Spaces by Hour 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 General Retail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Offices 0 35 103 137 154 171 154 137 103 69 35 18 9 0 0 Personal Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 147 133 125 118 111 103 96 103 103 103 111 125 133 143 145 Restaurant - Sit Down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Restaurant - High Turnover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 147 168 228 255 265 274 250 240 206 172 146 143 142 143 145 Maximum 274 soaces P:\2014\14001\Parking\shared parking 10-2014.gpw, 10/31/14 ray From: Andrew Rowe <andy@ldengineering.com> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:57 AM To: ray Cc: Chris Snyder Subject: Green Mountain Drive Hi Ray — The height of the trash/recycling storage building is 13 feet, as measured from the finish floor to the mid -point of the sloped roof. (From finish floor to the peak of the roof is 16 feet) Please let me know if you need anything else. Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 878-4450 27 Green Mountain Drive Landscape Estimate of Probable Cost November 2014 Item Size Unit Cost* Quantity Subtotal Trees Acerx freemanii 'Autumn Fantasy' Freeman maple 2" - 2 1/2" Cal $550 3 $1,650 Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry 2" - 2 1/2" Cal $550 5 $2,750 Betula nigra 'Heritage' Heritage river birch 2" - 2 1/2" Cal $550 3 $1,650 Corpus alternifolia Pagoda dogwood 1 1/2" - 2" Cal $375 8 $3,000 Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' Ginkgo 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $700 4 $2,800 Gleditsia triacanthos 'Shademaster' Honeylocust 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $700 5 $3,500 Hamamelis virginiana American witchhazel 1 1/2" - 2" Cal $325 10 $3,250 Juniperus virginiana 'Canaertii' Eastern red cedar 6' - 7' height $250 4 $1,000 Quercus rubra Northern red oak 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $700 2 $1,400 Shrubs Deciduous shrub 18" - 24" $65 225 $14,625 Evergreen shrub 8" min. $45 55 $2,475 Perennial Plugs - see plans 2" sq x 4.5" deep $4.50 343 $1,544 Groundcover Plugs - see plans 2" sq x 4.5" deep $4.00 1268 $5,072 Stormwater basin mix Plugs - see plans 2" sq x 4.5" deep $4.00 965 $3,860 Total Estimate: $48,576 Proposed construction costs Building construction $6,050,000 Site work $450,000 TOTAL $6,500,000 Required Landscaping Value $ 250,000 @ 3% $7,500 $ 250,000 @ 2% $5,000 $ 6,000,000 @ 1 % $60,000 TOTAL $72,500 25 and 27 Green Mountain Dr Lamoreaux and Dickinson 12/17/14 Overall the landscape plan looks good. My only recommendation is that a specification for the landscape planting mix that is called for tin the planting details be included in the plan Prelim. Plan Application 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Abutter List (Nov., 2014) MDT Partnership, LLP 1650 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Kurt & Laura Reichelt Kurt V. Reichelt Rev. Trust 163 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 City of South Burlington c/o Planning & Zoning Dept 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Heritage Automotive Group, Inc 1580 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Lark Inns, LP 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert Berman, LLC 35 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 UVM-Campus Planning Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405 27 Green Mountain Drive Landscape Estimate of Probable Cost November 2014 Item Size Unit Cost" Quantity Subtotal Trees Acerx freemanii Autumn Fantasy' Freeman maple 2" - 2 1/2" Cal $550 3 $1,650 Amelanchierlaevis Allegheny serviceberry 2" - 2 1/2" Cal $550 5 $2,750 Betula nigra 'Heritage' Heritage river birch 2" - 2 1/2" Cal $550 3 $1,650 Cornus alternifolia Pagoda dogwood 1 1/2" - 2" Cal $375 8 $3,000 Ginkgo biloba Autumn Gold' Ginkgo 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $700 4 $2,800 Gleditsia triacanthos 'Shademaster' Honeylocust 2 112" - 3" Cal $700 5 $3,500 Hamamelis virginiana American witchhazel 1 112" - 2" Cal $325 10 $3,250 Juniperus virginiana 'Canaertii' Eastern red cedar 6' - 7' height $250 4 $1,000 Quercus rubra lNorthern red oak 2 112" - 3" Cal $700 2 $1,400 Shrubs Deciduous shrub 18" - 24" $65 225 $14,625 Evergreen shrub 8" min. $45 55 $2,475 _d Perennial Plugs - see plans 2" sq x 4.5" deep $4.50 343 $1,544 Groundcover Plugs - see plans 2" sq x 4.5" deep $4.00 1268 $5,072 Stormwater basin mix Plugs - see plans 2" sq x 4.5" deep $4.00 965 $3,860 Total Estimate: $48,576 Proposed construction costs Building construction $6,050,000 Site work $450,000 TOTAL $6,500,000 Required Landscaping Value $ 250,000 @ 3% $7,500 $ 250,000 @ 2% $5,000 $ 6,000,000 @ 1% $60,000 TOTAL $72,500 27 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington November 2014 Estimated value of existing trees - east of new multi -family building within area of understory clearing Item Diameter Value/inch diameter" Subtotal Trees Pinus strobus White pine 20 $200 $4,000 Pinus strobus White pine 24 $200 $4,800 Pinus strobus White pine 18 $200 $3,600 Pinus strobus White pine 14 $200 $2,800 Pinus strobus White pine 28 $200 $5,600 Pinus strobus White pine 24 $200 $4,800 Pinus strobus White pine 20 $200 $4,000 Pinus strobus White pine 22 $200 $4,400 Pinus strobus White pine 16 $200 $3,200 Pinus strobus White pine 18 $200 $3,600 Acersaccharum Sugar maple 8 $200 $1,600 Pinus strobus White pine 10 $200 $2,000 Pinus strobus White pine 20 $200 $4,000 Pinus strobus White pine 14 $200 $2,800 Pinus strobus White pine 16 $200 $3,200 Pinus strobus White pine 12 $200 $2,400 Pinus strobus White pine 8 $200 $1,600 Pinus strobus White pine 16 $200 $3,200 Pinus strobus White pine 16 $200 $3,200 Pinus strobus White pine 20 $200 $4,000 Pinus strobus White pine 14 $200 $2,800 Pinus strobus White pine 18 $200 $3,600 Pinus strobus White pine 16 $200 $3,200 Pinus strobus White pine 20 $200 $4,000 Total Estimate: $82 400 - ` The value of the existing trees has been conservatively estimated to be $200 per inch of diameter Traffic Impact Assessment 25-27 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT Introduction 25-27 Green Mountain Drive (the Project) involves the development of a 65 unit apartment building on Lot 1 (#27 Green Mountain Drive). Lot 2 (#25 Green Mountain Drive) is an existing developed lot having a 48,578 sf office building (Allscripts). Both lots are presently under common ownership and are accessed via a common driveway onto Green Mountain Drive. They will also share on -site parking. Green Mountain Drive provides direct access onto Shelburne Road (US Route 7) at a signalized intersection. It also connects with IDX Drive to the north; which also intersects with Shelburne Road at a signalized intersection. No -Build Traffic Volumes Shelburne Road is a state highway and is classified by the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) as an urban principal arterial. Current annual average daily traffic volumes (AADT) on Shelburne Road equal 30,500± vehicles per day (vpd) north of its intersection with Green Mountain Drive, and 27,100± vpd south. For the purpose of this TIA, this Project is anticipated to be occupied in 2017. From that, the standard 5-year projection is applied to develop year 2022 traffic volumes. At this location, the afternoon peak hour period experiences the highest traffic volumes and is the time period during which the design hour volume (DHV) generally occurs. The DHV is the 30`h highest hourly traffic volume that occurs in a given year, and is used in the design of highways and intersections to determine existing and future traffic congestion conditions. Peak hour intersection turning movement volumes were obtained from a turning movement count performed by VTrans at the Shelburne Rd/Green Mountain Dr/Bartlett Bay Rd intersection on October 17, 2012. The DHV adjustment factor for this turning movement count was obtained from continuous count station (CTC) D099, located on 1-189 to the north in South Burlington. Background traffic growth factors from 2012 to 2017 and from 2017 to 2022 were calculated from VTrans traffic projections for CTC D099. The resulting 2012 to 2022 background traffic growth rate equaled 1.02 (2%). Detailed DHV calculations are enclosed as Appendix A. Lamoureux & Dickinson November 6, 2014 Consulting Engineers, Inc. Page 1 Figure 1 presents the estimated 2022 No -Build AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hour (DHV) volumes at the Shelburne Rd/Green Mountain Dr/Bartlett Bay Rd intersection. Figure 1 - 2022 No -Build Peak Hour Volumes AM Peak Hour Shelburne Rd 89 950 112 � y y Bartlett 48 71 IC 25 Green Bay 10 4 F 2 Mtn Rd 17 V IL 14 Dr 50 1328 87 Shelburne Rd Project -Generated Trips PM Peak Hour (DHV) Shelburne Rd 60 1266 23 ile 4, v Bartlett 95 21 IC 88 Green Bay 3 4 F 0 Mtn Rd 33 V W 116 Dr 36 1016 25 Shelburne Rd The additional new trip generation of this Project was estimated using trip generation data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for LUC 230 - Residential Condominium. This land -use category was selected as it provides slightly higher peak hour trip rates than the apartment land -use category. Table 1 shows the resulting estimated average weekday vehicular trip generation. Table 1 - 27 Green Mountain Drive Vehicle Trip Generation Average Weekday' AM Peak HourZ PM Peak HourZ Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total 412 6 31 37 28 14 42 vehicle trip ends per day (vte/day) Z vehicle trip ends per hour (vte/hr) The directional patterns of the above peak hour trips were estimated using Chittenden County town by town employment data. That data indicates that 94% of Chittenden County's employment is located to the north and northeast of the Project. Almost all community facilities (schools, shopping, etc.) used by residents in the Shelburne Road area of South Burlington are also located to the north and northeast of the Project. Figure 2 illustrates the directional distribution of new Project -generated peak hour trips. Detailed trip generation calculations are enclosed as Appendix B. Figure 3 illustrates the resulting total of existing traffic volumes plus Project trips (2022 Build DHV). Lamoureux & Dickinson November 6, 2014 Consulting Engineers, Inc. Page 2 Figure 2 - Project Trip Distribution AM Peak Hour Shelburne Rd 0 0 6 le y y Bartlett 0 21 K 29 Green Bay 0 4 E 0 Mtn Rd 0 y V 2 Dr 0 0 0 0 Shelburne Rd PM Peak Hour (DHV) Shelburne Rd 0 0 26 � y y Bartlett 0 21 K 13 Green Bay 0 4 E 0 Mtn Rd 0 y Ile 1 Dr 0 0 2 2 Shelburne Rd Figure 3 - 2022 Build DHV AM Peak Hour Shelburne Rd 89 950 118 le 40 y Bartlett 48 21 K 54 Green Bay 10 4 E 2 Mtn Rd 17 V W 16 Dr K T 50 1328 87 Shelburne Rd PM Peak Hour (DHV) Shelburne Rd 60 1266 49 Ir y V Bartlett 95 21 K 101 Green' Bay 3 4 E 0 Mtn Rd 33 U K 117 Dr K � 36 1016 27 Shelburne Rd Traffic Congestion Traffic congestion conditions are identified by "levels of service", commonly referred to as "LOS". The ranges are A to F; where A represents essentially free flow (no congestion), C represents average congestion, and F represents severe congestion. At intersections, the LOS is determined by the overall delay experienced by all turning and through movements. The level of service criteria for intersections is shown in Table 2. In Vermont, VTrans has adopted a level of service policy for the state highway system. This policy establishes LOS C as the desired design target for the overall intersection at signalized intersections. The overall intersection level of service is determined by the weighted average of the delay experienced on all approaches. Individual approach and/or lane levels of service at signalized intersections may be lower than LOS C. Lamoureux & Dickinson November 6, 2014 Consulting Engineers, Inc. Page 3 Table 2 - Level of Service/Delay Criteria' LOS Average Delay (sec/veh) LOS Average Delay (sec/veh) Signalized Unsignalized Signalized Unsignalized A s10 s10 D s55 535 B s20 s15 E s80 <50 C s35 <25 F >80 >50 Intersection capacity analyses were performed at the Shelburne Rd/Green Mountain Dr/Bartlett Bay Rd intersection for year 2020 "No -Build" and "Build" scenarios. The incremental impact of this Project on future traffic congestion conditions can be determined by comparing the results of the two sets of analyses. The results of the capacity analyses are shown in Table 3. Detailed results are enclosed as Appendix C. Table 3 - Shelburne Rd/Green Mountain Dr Intersection Capacity Analyses Results 2022 AM Peak Hour 2022 PM Peak Hour (DHV) No -Build Build No -Build Build LOS Delay V/C Max Q LOS Delay I V/C Max Q LOS Delay I V/C Max Q LOS Delay V/C Max Q Approach Bartlett Bay Rd EB LT Bartlett Bay Rd EB TH/RT C B 23 12 0.19 0.08 36' 19' C B 23 12 0.19 0.08 36' 19' C A 30 9 0.37 0.11 77' 23' C A 30 9 0.37 0.10 77' 23' Green Mountain Dr EB LT Green Mountain Dr EB TH/RT Shelburne Rd NB LT Shelburne Rd NB TH/RT Shelburne Rd SB LT Shelburne Rd SB TH/RT B A C B D B 19 9 34 19 36 11 0.06 0.09 0.25 0.74 0.41 0.44 15' 16' 76' 608' 159' 377' B A C B D B 20 7 34 20 36 it 0.06 0.17 0.25 0.75 0.42 0.44 17' 24' 76' 608' 168' 377' C A D B D B 31 3 40 10 36 14 0.43 0.21 0.21 0.44 0.14 0.59 91' 23' 73' 335' 38' 521' C A D B D B 31 4 40 13 38 14 0.43 0.24 0.21 0.50 0.27 0.63 91' 30' 73' 336' 75' 521' OVERALL B 17 B 17 B 14 B 15 The above results indicate that the Shelburne Rd/Green Mountain Dr intersection has sufficient capacity to accommodate this Project's peak hour trips, and will continue to provide acceptable levels of service. Although the above analyses have routed all new project -generated trips via Green Mountain Drive to and from Shelburne Road, secondary access to this Project and surrounding parcels is also provided via IDX Drive to the north. IDX Drive also intersects with Shelburne Road at a signalized intersection, and it is possible that a small number of new project -generated trips may use IDX Drive for convenience sake. 1 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000 Lamoureux & Dickinson November 6, 2014 Consulting Engineers, Inc. Page 4 Sa et The posted speed limit on Shelburne Rd equals 35 mph. It is a four -lane divided highway in the immediate vicinity of Green Mountain Dr, which greatly reduces conflicts resulting from traffic entering and exiting the many curb cuts along its length. There are no identified high crash locations on Shelburne Road in South Burlington or Shelburne in the VTrans 2008-2012 High Crash Location Report. Multi -Modal Facilities Sidewalks are provided on both sides of Shelburne Rd and on the north side of IDX Dr. There are no sidewalks on Green Mountain Dr, except for a 500 ft section on the west side of its northerly leg connecting with IDX Dr. This Project will construct a new sidewalk linking the proposed apartment building to Green Mountain Dr, and along its property frontage on the south side of Green Mountain Dr. That sidewalk will be extended west to Shelburne Rd and north towards IDX Dr in the future by abutting property owners in accordance with City of South Burlington sidewalk construction requirements. Pedestrian signals and crosswalks also exist on the east, west and south approaches of the Shelburne Rd/Green Mountain Dr intersection. CCTA provides local transit service at % hour headways along Shelburne Road. There are bus stops on both sides of Shelburne Rd at Green Mountain Dr. A bus shelter is also located in the northeast corner. Similar facilities also exist to the north at the Shelburne Rd/IDX Dr intersection. While not as close to this Project as the Green Mountain Dr intersection, it is conceivable that some project residents might choose to use that location to access local transit service. This TIA has not adjusted this Project's estimated trip generation to reflect potential transit use or pedestrian travel to and from nearby destinations. Transportation Impact Fees As part of its local approval, this Project will be required to pay $23,940 ($570 per pm peak hour vehicle trip end) to the City in traffic impact fees. Those fees will be used to construct designated highway and intersection improvements throughout the City (as identified in the City Impact Fee Ordinance). Examination of the City Impact Fee Ordinance and the 2012 Shelburne Road Corridor Study2 indicate that there are no planned major capital improvements on Shelburne Road or other city streets in the vicinity of this Project. 2 Shelburne Road Corridor Study, Parsons Brinckerhoff, December 2012 Lamoureux & Dickinson November 6, 2014 Consulting Engineers, Inc. Page 5 Conclusions From the foregoing analyses, we have formed the following conclusions and recommendations regarding the potential traffic congestion and safety impacts of this Project: • Intersection capacity analyses at the Shelburne Rd/Green Mountain Dr/Bartlett Bay Rd intersection indicate that acceptable levels of service will be maintained with this Project. • There is no evidence of unsafe traffic conditions existing presently or that would potentially be created by this Project. OF V O 45 t;ivil 4; NSS Fs�/ ONALENG� �. Lamoureux & Dickinson November 6, 2014 Consulting Engineers, Inc. Page 6 Appendix A DHV Calculations Lamoureux 8t Dickinson 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 T: (802) 878-4450 / F: (802) 878-3135 www.LDengineering.com : Project Project No. _ J'I O CD I Sheet No. of Calculated by Date 11- Checked by Date Subject JT H V CrA act), L,�:D C) P JS F2013 Growth Factors by Regression Analysis Group A: Interstate Highways Regression Analysis 20 Year GF Short term GF Site ID Route No Town Year 2013 to 2033 2008 to 2013 P6C002 191 Sheffield 1994 1.12 1.06 P6C015 193 Waterford 1994 1.35 1.05 P6D091 189 South Burlington 1994 1.20 1.06 P6D092 189 Colchester 1994 1.21 1.03 P6D099 1189 South Burlington 1994 1.04 1.04 P6F096 189 Swanton 1994 1.17 1.07 P6N002 191 Bradford 1994 1.15 0.95 P6P082 191 Derby 1994 0.87 1.01 P6R001 US4 Fair Haven 1994 1.08 0.93 P6W002 189 Berlin 1994 1.15 0.98 P6W089 189 Waterbury 1994 1.17 1.03 P6X071 191 Vernon 1994 0.92 0.96 P6X072 191 Brattleboro 1994 0.97 0.91 P6X073 191 Putney 1994 0.94 0.90 P6X074 191 Rockingham 1994 1.03 0.97 P6Y001 189 Bethel 1994 1.17 1.00 P6Y002 191 Norwich 1994 1.15 0.97 GROUP AVG 1.10 1.00 B: Urban P6D001 VT127 Burlington 1994 0.72 0.96 P6D040 US7 Colchester 1994 1.16 1.01 P6D129 VT2A Williston 1994 0.93 1.04 P6R022 US7 Rutland Town 1994 0.89 0.96 P6W004 VT62 Barre City 1994 1.04 0.81 P6W006 US302 Berlin 1994 0.88 1.10 P6W024 US2 Montpelier 1994 0.99 1.10 P6X011 US5 Brattleboro 1994 0.89 0.99 GROUP AVG 0.94 1.00 Continued on Next Page... 67 Vermont Agency of Transportation Technical Services Division Monthly Summary of Continuous Traffic Count Data October 2012 Station P6O099 Location S Burlington: 1189 OAO mi E of US7 Hours of Day Date 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Daily total 10/01112 Mon 146 87 61 105 246 662 1511 3352 3548 2542 2408 2511 2755 2781 2978 3474 3725 4237 2623 1520 1113 790 446 349 43970 10102112 Tue 149 106 64 109 240 678 1630 3591 3520 2446 2297 2499 2715 2675 2986 3326 3924 4365 2672 1746 1088 820 484 353 44483 10103112 Wed 179 89 73 107 223 702 1611 3578 3529 2505 2409 2603 2794 2794 3052 3565 4026 4415 2760 1811 1242 827 516 368 45778 10104/12 Thu 179 103 93 101 250 646 1592 3614 3511 2536 2430 2700 2967 2961 3153 3532 3871 4221 2658 1738 1194 914 519 466 45948 10105112 F. 209 141 96 115 278 660 1476 3428 3309 2550 2617 2881 3155 3054 3322 3761 4114 4121 3229 2109 1533 1183 974 664 48979 10/06/12 sat 336 136 123 117 123 281 504 1106 1396 1913 2444 2863 3224 3234 3225 3202 2984 2847 2290 1627 1295 1056 960 547 37623 10107/12 sun 250 144 106 91 124 159 357 572 922 1544 1982 2402 2725 2746 2706 2692 2583 2324 1943 1447 1007 651 446 294 30217 10/08/12 Mon 164 117 69 209 227 584 1409 3006 3064 2508 2572 2830 3045 2985 3160 3605 3891 4101 2633 1720 1115 797 453 324 44488 10109112 Tue 149 89 68 96 248 681 1632 3505 3720 2609 2408 2511 2950 2775 3009 3596 3963 4299 2799 1752 1135 847 460 354 45655 10110112 Wed 159 96 70 86 242 709 1578 3531 3616 2465 2406 2579 2904 2805 3035 3474 3948 3886 2580 1704 1150 856 488 343 44710 10111112 Tlu 176 80 75 129 234 618 1599 3513 3682 2495 2352 2761 2837 2685 3158 3552 3942 4378 2850 1789 1283 881 528 388 45985 101121112 Fd 229 105 77 97 250 672 1424 3327 3385 2528 2625 2874 3075 3209 3276 3800 4182 4237 2996 1759 1395 1151 796 543 48012 10113112 sat 273 160 91 128 196 334 606 977 1486 1952 2415 2947 3182 3041 2958 3050 2878 2708 2060 1639 1240 959 795 527 36602 10114112 sun 278 145 105 80 137 169 369 559 775 1261 1829 2292 2680 2630 2625 2532 2375 1875 1604 1216 865 507 412 287 27607 10115112 Mon 126 87 73 101 250 647 1583 3491 3460 2382 2328 2494 2756 2680 2942 3381 3858 4109 2569 1581 1118 747 439 306 43508 10116112 Tue 176 91 82 104 248 665 1624 3467 3527 2420 2277 2505 2766 2746 3092 3509 3931 2858 1765 1093 836 479 381 44702 10117112 wed 153 79 81 97 231 668 1572 3533 3463 2432 2269 2593 2969 2823 3007 3491 3857 4178 949 1750 1294 853 542 353 45137 10118112 Ti. 220 104 89 102 230 654 1599 3578 3463 2546 2441 2582 2954 2882 3054 3483 3867 4275 R690 1941 1374 932 561 409 45930 10119/12 Fri 223 125 92 111 271 695 1414 3065 3191 2480 2619 2974 3195 3169 3370 3607 3884 3 1 2691 1795 1278 1097 694 604 46625 10120112 sat 250 188 129 124 129 275 493 972 1374 1819 2376 2841 3033 2987 2924 3056 2965 2674 2142 1577 1252 993 791 508 35872 10121/12 sun 308 143 117 90 131 161 303 582 859 1290 1862 2205 2617 2592 2550 2547 2312 1961 1544 1109 848 528 377 282 27318 10122112 Mon 128 85 64 91 254 603 1599 3432 3434 2354 2265 2396 2813 2609 2808 3362 3767 4148 2558 1554 1071 716 428 302 42841 10123112 ha 155 87 96 104 277 661 1602 3501 3574 2338 2285 2482 2690 2640 2983 3519 3972 4185 2561 1733 1079 823 450 383 44180 10124112 wed 151 83 85 111 263 636 1559 3593 3517 2481 2339 2506 2686 2673 2880 3495 3811 4209 2725 1786 1199 837 487 361 44473 10125/12 Ttu 184 113 101 119 256 650 1661 3558 3498 2418 2212 2442 2700 2713 3001 3405 4051 4235 2735 1828 1228 911 621 425 45065 10126/12 Fd 232 103 93 134 256 705 1519 3407 3483 2573 2706 2830 3237 3029 3398 3727 4162 4229 2845 2075 1409 1103 848 S90 48693 10127112 sat 293 174 100 133 153 308 526 1008 1467 1937 2323 2757 2989 2922 2997 2940 2762 2606 2138 1478 1309 925 715 529 35489 10/28112 sun 290 192 129 116 124 170 286 555 833 1414 2015 2275 2784 2564 2524 2549 2282 1945 1571 1157 879 546 390 260 278SO 10129112 Mon 139 108 51 102 170 600 1541 3452 3488 2392 2328 2520 2798 2837 2790 3171 3470 3619 1729 975 617 434 263 213 39797 10130112 T. 101 64 75 75 161 488 1178 2514 2611 2037 1949 2086 2471 2473 2617 2902 3337 3750 2373 1515 1028 683 414 276 37178 10131112 wed 114 74 88 106 221 685 1615 3497 3504 2469 2190 2445 2811 2628 2884 3385 3936 3924 1944 1342 1037 770 461 332 42462 Adj Avg M-F 170 97 80 106 241 652 1544 3416 3439 2462 2389 2605 2983 2822 3055 3494 3900 4143 2664 1717 1190 874 549 404 44896 Avg Sat 288 165 111 126 150 300 S32 1016 1431 1905 2390 2852 3107 3046 3026 3062 2872 2709 2155 1580 1274 983 790 528 36397 Avg Sun 282 156 114 94 129 165 329 567 847 1377 1922 2294 2702 2633 2601 2580 2388 2026 1666 1232 900 558 406 281 28248 Atli Avg Day 203 115 89 107 212 532 1226 2666 2782 2227 2323 2596 2889 2827 2986 3301 3537 3636 2449 1628 1160 9" 563 404 41304 High Hour 4415 Wed 10103/12 1-1, �-'7 ? \) .F )a LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES PROJECT / TOWN: South Burlington BY: R. Dickinson PROJECT #: 14001 CHECKED: INTERSECTION: Shelburne Rd/Green Mtn Dr/Bartlett Bay Rd COUNT DAY/DATE: VTrans 10-17-12 AM/PM?: PM (4:45 - 5:45 pm) ENTER DHV ADJ. FACTOR: 4279/4178 = 1.024 ( 57) ( 1212) ( 22) KEY ENTER GROWTH FACTORS: [ 59 ] [ 1253 ] [ 23 ] ( OBSERVED PEAK ) AREA TYPE = Urban { 60 } { 1266 } { 23 } HOUR VOLUME BASE YEAR 2017 = 1.01 IC 41 y [ 2017 DHV ] FUT. YEAR 2022 = 1.02 { 2022 DHV } ( 91) [ 94] { 951 X ( 3) [ 3] { 3) 4 ( 32) [ 331 { 33 } V K ( 84) [ 87 ] { 88 } E( 0)[ 0]{ 0} IC( 111) [ 1151 { 1161 T T ( 34) ( 973) ( 24 ) T [ 35 ] [ 1006 ] [ 25 ] NORTH { 36 } { 1016 } { 25 } TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES: YEAR WEST EAST NORTH SOUTH COUNT ( 217) ( 244) ( 2439) ( 2386 ) 2017 [ 224 ] [ 253 ] [ 2522 ] [ 2467 ] 2022 { 227 } { 255 } { 2548 } { 2492 } P:\2014\14001\Traffic\TRAFFIC.gpw, 11/07/14 LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES PROJECT / TOWN: South Burlington BY: R. Dickinson PROJECT #: 14001 CHECKED: INTERSECTION: Shelburne Rd/Green Mtn Dr/Bartlett Bay Rd COUNT DAY/DATE: VTrans 10-17-12 AM/PM?: AM (7:45 - 8:45 am) ENTER DHV ADJ. FACTOR: 4279/4178 = 1.024 ( 85) ( 910) ( 107) KEY ENTER GROWTH FACTORS: [ 88 ] [ 941 ] [ 111 ] ( OBSERVED PEAK ) AREA TYPE = Rural P/S { 89 } { 950 } { 112 } HOUR VOLUME BASE YEAR 2017 = 1.01 IC 40 v [ 2017 DHV ] FUT. YEAR 2022 = 1.02 { 2022 DHV } ( 46) [ 48 ] { 48 } A ( 10)[ 10]{ 1014 ( 16)[ 17] { 1711I IC ( 24) [ 25 ] { 25 } IL( 13) [ 13] { 141 T T ( 48) ( 1271) ( 83 ) T [ 50] [ 1315] [ 86] NORTH { 50 } { 1328 } { 87 } TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES: YEAR WEST EAST NORTH SOUTH COUNT ( 207) ( 239) ( 2443) ( 2341 ) 2017 [ 215 ] [ 247 ] [ 2528 ] [ 2422 ] 2022 { 216 } { 250 } { 2552 } { 2446 } P:\2014\14001\Traffic\TRAFFIC.gpw, 11/07/14 Appendix 8 Trip Generation Calculations LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ESSEX, VT 05452 VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION PROJECT NAME: Green Mountain Drive ANALYST: R. Dickinson PROJECT #: 14001 CHECKED: SOURCE: TRIP GENERATION, ITE, 9TH EDITION LAND -USE ITE AVG. -- AM PEAK HOUR -- -- PM PEAK HOUR -- DESCRIPTION L.U.C. SIZE UNITS WKDY ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 210 0 UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APARTMENT 220 65 UNITS 432 7 26 33 26 14 40 LOW-RISE APARTMENT 221 0 UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM 230 65 UNITS 442 6 31 37 28 14 42 SENIOR ADULT HOUSING - DETACHED 251 0 UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SENIOR ADULT HOUSING - ATTACHED 251 0 UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY 253 0 UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ASSISTED LIVING 254 0 BEDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RECREATIONAL HOMES 260 0 UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RESIDENTIAL PUD 270 0 UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VTE/DAY VTE/HOUR VTE/HOUR P:\2014\14001\Traffic\TRIPGEN 91h ed.qpw, 11/06/14 IDLamoureux &t Dickinson 14 Morse Drive, Essex, of 05452 T: (802) 878-4450 / F: (802) 878-3135 www.LDengineering.com Project Project No. l 4001 Sheet No. I of Calculated by ,p Date 10 -10 -1 Y Checked by Date Subject p'DIs )q i-�3Gt i)0I-J �i Lamoureux 8t Dickinson 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 T: (802) 878-4450 / F: (802) 878-3135 www.LDengineering.com Project Project No. H O b) Sheet No. —�-- of Calculated by Date I 1 D6- `1 y Checked by Date Subject r ��' O) ZT'A 1'8U i) Of\ J Vermont Economic and Demograp' �rofile Series 2014 Effective Population 2012 1/ % Share County Annual Average Employment 2012 2/ Annual Average Wage 2012 2/ Median Adjusted Income 2012 /4 Homestead Education Tax Rate 2013 3/ Vermont 626,011 NA 299,532 $40,965 $33,829 NA Chittenden County 158,504 100.0% 97,710 $47,812 NA NA Bolton 1,188 0.7% 158 $23,571 $45,677 $1.56 Buels Gore 30 0.0% -- -- NA $0.94 Burlington City 42,282 26.7% 33,177 $50,922 $29,456 $1.31 Charlotte 3,812 2.4% 514 $40,006 $57,482 $1.54 Colchester 17,245 10.9% 9,218 $46,938 $40,832 $1.35 Essex 20,057 12.7% 11,492 $51,379 $58,995 $1.41 Hinesburg 4,457 2.8% 1,224 $39,726 $44,750 $1.47 Huntington 1,969 1.2% 164 $32,576 $47,450 $1.34 Jericho 5,028 3.2% 732 $37,409 $54,617 $1.38 Milton 10,526 6.6% 2,506 $40,836 $40,653 $1.29 Richmond 4,093 2.6% 1,325 $41,087 $46,657 $1.38 St. George 680 0.4% 45 $33,804 $40,184 $1.51 Shelburne 7,449 4.7% 3,383 $34,354 $55,672 $1.38 So. Burlington City 18,400 11.6% 18,079 $45,190 $44,963 $1.48 Underhill 3,044 1.9% 244 $38,878 $62,777 $1.36 Westford 2,043 1.3% 161 $37,484 $51,736 $1.38 Williston 8,962 5.7% 12,932 $49,469 $53,494 $1.39 Winooski City 7,239 4.6% 2,356 $45,311 $27,708 $1.11 1/ Vermont Department of Health. 2/ Vermont Department of Labor; Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages. 3/ Vermont Division of Property Valuation and Review. 4/ Vermont Department of Taxes, Vermont Tax Statistics, Median Adjusted Gross Income by School District. * See Glossary for further details D denotes data which cannot be disclosed. NA denotes data is Not Available. -- No Employment and Wages Vermont Department of Labor, Economic and Labor Market Information Division Page 14 Appendix C Intersection Capacity Analyses Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 AM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr No -Build Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi T ll� tT tl Volume (vph) 48 10 17 14 2 25 50 1328 87 112 950 89 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.906 0.861 0.991 0.987 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1688 0 1770 1604 0 1770 3413 0 1770 3402 0 Flt Permitted 0.740 0.740 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1378 1688 0 1378 1604 0 1770 3413 0 1770 3402 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 25 11 16 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 787 847 859 795 Travel Time (s) 17.9 19.3 19.5 18.1 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 2% 2% 5% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 48 10 17 14 2 25 50 1328 87 112 950 89 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 27 0 14 27 0 50 1415 0 112 1039 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 P:120141140011Traffic\Synchro12020 AM No-Build.syn 11/7/2014 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 AM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr No -Build --* -* 'r .- *,. " \ t !* \P� i 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 7.0 27.0 7.0 27.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 8.0 29.0 9.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 45.7% 45.7% 45.7% 45.7% 11.4% 41.4% 12.9% 42.9% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 2.0 23.0 3.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 12.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 4 4 4 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 13.0 13.0 12.8 12.8 8.0 39.0 10.8 48.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.56 0.15 0.69 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.08 0.06 0.09 0.25 0.74 0.41 0.44 Control Delay 22.6 11.9 19.3 8.6 33.8 19.3 36.3 11.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.6 11.9 19.3 8.6 33.8 19.3 36.3 11.3 LOS C B B A C B D B Approach Delay 18.7 12.2 19.7 13.7 Approach LOS B B B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 4 5 1 20 253 42 135 Queue Length 95th (ft) 36 19 15 16 #76 #608 #159 #377 Internal Link Dist (ft) 707 767 779 715 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 551 685 551 656 202 1908 272 2348 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.25 0.74 0.41 0.44 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. P:120141140011TrafficlSynchro12020 AM No-Build.syn 11/7/2014 R. Dickinson Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 AM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr No -Build Splits and Phases: 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bav Rd/Green Mountain Dr 01 I o2 1 05 06 R a-- 08 vqj q/ytyn P:120141140011Traffic\Synchro12020 AM No-Build.syn 11/7/2014 R. Dickinson Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 AM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr Build --1 --► --v f- '- ',- 4\ t \*� 1 ./ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi T Vi T Vi 0 Vi 0 Volume (vph) 48 10 17 16 2 54 50 1328 87 118 950 89 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.906 0.855 0.991 0.987 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1688 0 1770 1593 0 1770 3413 0 1770 3402 0 Fit Permitted 0.720 0.740 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1341 1688 0 1378 1593 0 1770 3413 0 1770 3402 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 54 11 16 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 787 847 859 795 Travel Time (s) 17.9 19.3 19.5 18.1 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 2% 2% 5% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 48 10 17 16 2 54 50 1328 87 118 950 89 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 27 0 16 56 0 50 1415 0 118 1039 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 P:\2014\14001\Traffic\Synchro\2020AM Build.syn 11/7/2014 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 AM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr Build Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 7.0 27.0 7.0 27.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 8.0 29.0 9.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 45.7% 45.7% 45.7% 45.7% 11.4% 41.4% 12.9% 42.9% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 2.0 23.0 3.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 12.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 4 4 4 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 13.0 13.0 12.8 12.8 8.0 38.5 11.3 48.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.55 0.16 0.69 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.08 0.06 0.17 0.25 0.75 0.42 0.44 Control Delay 22.6 11.8 19.5 7.0 33.8 19.7 36.2 11.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.6 11.8 19.5 7.0 33.8 19.7 36.2 11.3 LOS C B B A C B D B Approach Delay 18.7 9.8 20.2 13.9 Approach LOS B A C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 4 6 1 20 257 44 136 Queue Length 95th (ft) 36 19 17 24 #76 #608 #168 #377 Internal Link Dist (ft) 707 767 779 715 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 536 685 551 669 202 1883 284 2346 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.25 0.75 0.42 0.44 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. P:120141140011TrafficlSynchro12020AM Build.syn 11/7/2014 R. Dickinson Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 AM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr Build Splits and Phases: 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bav Rd/Green Mountain Dr 11* 01 1 02 —'�"04 (�yy 3, G7,.S , r^A � ':""S"'+M�.''.45 `k b4h�i3,=4:*zF$`, .,k.."4+eP ftk'.`-kn"k.'�'a`'' :;1 32:,x J;-,)RA:L a^CF �k v*M^M40 +�41.. l o5 06 R 08 8 s 3© s' .'MW1�� P:120141140011TrafficlSynchro12020AM Build.syn 11/7/2014 R, Dickinson Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 PM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr No -Build Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►`i T T+ ►`j tT� tT Volume (vph) 95 3 33 116 0 88 36 1016 25 23 1266 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.862 0.850 0.996 0.993 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1606 0 1770 1583 0 1770 3427 0 1770 3418 0 Flt Permitted 0.700 0.734 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1304 1606 0 1367 1583 0 1770 3427 0 1770 3418 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 33 123 4 8 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 787 847 859 795 Travel Time (s) 17.9 19.3 19.5 18.1 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 2% 2% 5% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 95 3 33 116 0 88 36 1016 25 23 1266 60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 95 36 0 116 88 0 36 1041 0 23 1326 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 P:120141140011Traffic\Synchro12020 PM No-Build.syn 11/7/2014 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 PM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr No -Build Lane Group Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summar EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 7.0 27.0 7.0 27.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 7.0 39.0 9.0 41.0 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 8.8% 48.8% 11.3% 51.3% 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 1.0 33.0 3.0 35.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead Lag Lead Lag 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 None None None None None C-Max None C-Max 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 12.0 4 4 4 4 0 0 15.7 15.7 15.8 15.8 7.7 55.1 7.6 52.6 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.69 0.10 0.66 0.37 0.11 0.43 0.21 0.21 0.44 0.14 0.59 29.7 9.1 31.1 3.0 40.0 10.2 36.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.7 9.1 31.1 3.0 40.0 10.2 36.0 13.5 C A C A D B D B 24.0 19.0 11.2 13.8 C B B B 43 1 53 0 17 87 11 232 77 23 91 23 #73 335 38 #521 707 767 779 715 456 583 478 634 170 2361 167 2251 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.21 0.06 0.24 0.14 0.21 0.44 0.14 0.59 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 60 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. P:120141140011TrafficlSynchro12020 PM No-Build.syn 11/7/2014 R. Dickinson Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 PM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr No -Build P:120141140011Traffic\Synchro12020 PM No-Build.syn 11/7/2014 R. Dickinson Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 PM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr Build -' ---r -,t it +- *- - 4\ t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi T Vi T tT+ Vi tl Volume (vph) 95 3 33 117 0 101 36 1016 27 49 1266 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.862 0.850 0.996 0.993 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1606 0 1770 1583 0 1770 3427 0 1770 3418 0 Fit Permitted 0.692 0.734 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1289 1606 0 1367 1583 0 1770 3427 0 1770 3418 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 33 123 4 8 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 787 847 859 795 Travel Time (s) 17.9 19.3 19.5 18.1 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 2% 2% 5% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 95 3 33 117 0 101 36 1016 27 49 1266 60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 95 36 .0 No No No Left Left Right 12 0 16 1.00 1.00 15 1 2 Left Thru 20 100 0 0 0 0 20 6 CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94 6 CI+Ex 0.0 Perm NA 4 4 4 4 4.0 4.0 117 101 0 36 1043 0 No No No No No No Left Left Right Left Left Right 12 12 0 0 16 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 15 1 2 Left Thru 20 100 0 0 0 0 20 6 CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94 6 CI+Ex 0.0 Perm NA 8 8 8 4.0 N 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 15 1 2 Left Thru 20 100 0 0 0 0 20 6 CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94 6 CI+Ex 0.0 Prot NA 5 2 5 2 1.0 4.0 1.00 9 49 1326 0 No No No Left Left Right 12 0 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 1 2 Left Thru 20 100 0 0 0 0 20 6 CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94 6 CI+Ex 0.0 Prot NA 1 6 1 6 1.0 4.0 P:\2014\14001\Traffic\Synchro\2020 PM Build.syn 11/7/2014 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 PM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr Build Lane Group Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summar EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 7.0 27.0 7.0 27.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 7.0 39.0 9.0 41.0 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 8.8% 48.8% 11.3% 51.3% 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 1.0 33.0 3.0 35.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead Lag Lead Lag 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 None _ None None None None C-Max None C-Max 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 12.0 4 4 4 4 0 0 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 7.7 48.7 8.3 49.2 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.61 0.10 0.62 0.37 0.10 0.43 0.24 0.21 0.50 0.27 0.63 29.6 9.1 31.1 4.3 40.0 12.5 37.8 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.6 9.1 31.1 4.3 40.0 12.5 37.8 14.2 C A C A D B D B 24.0 18.7 13.4 15.0 C B B B 43 1 53 0 17 162 23 232 77 23 91 30 #73 336 #75 #521 707 767 779 715 451 583 478 634 170 2086 182 2105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.21 0.06 0.24 0.16 0.21 0.50 0.27 0.63 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 60 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. P:120141140011TrafficlSynchro12020 PM Build.syn 11/7/2014 R. Dickinson Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 PM DHV 3: Shelburne Rd & Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mountain Dr Build P:120141140011Traffic\Synchro12020 PM Build.syn R. Dickinson 11/7/2014 Page 3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: June 13, 2014 SD_14_16_StonehengelnvestmentCorp_25_27GreenM Application received: May 2, 2014 ountainDrive sketch SKETCH PLAN REVIEW #SD-14-16 THE SNYDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC — 25-27 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE Agenda # 5 Me( Applicant The Snyder Construction Company, LLC 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 Contact Person Andrew Rowe Lamoreux & Dickinson Engineers 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 Location Map Date: June 17, 2014 Owners The Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. 1 Lawson Lane Burlington, VT 05402 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD 14 16 StonehengelnvestmentCorp 25 27GreenMountainDrive sketch PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sketch plan application #SD-14-16 of The Snyder Construction Company, LLC for a planned unit development on two (2) parcels totaling 13.25 acres with lot #1 developed with a 55,230 sq. ft. general office building. The project consists of: 1) resubdividing lot #1 to increase its size to 10.33 acres, 2) decreasing the size of lot #2 to 2.92 acres, and 3) developing lot #2 with a four (4) story 60 unit multi- family dwelling, 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive. COMMENTS Administrative Officer Ray Belair, and Lee Krohn, AICP. Planner Temporary Assistant, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on May 2, 2104 and offer the following comments: DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS: Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: C — 2 Zoning District Required Existing Proposed Lot #1 Proposed Lot #2 Min. Lot Size 6000 sq. ft./unit residential, 40,000 sq. ft. other 9.55 ac/3.70 ac 10.33 acres 2.92 acres* Max. Building Coverage 40% 4%/0% 4% 19% Max. Overall Coverage 70% 23%/16% 28% 48% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. >50 ft. No change >50 ft. Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. No change >10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. No change 47 ft. Max. Building Height 40ft. (pitched roof) unknown No change 52 ft. Zoning compliance A Requires a height waiver of 12 feet *In C2, up to seven housing units per acre are permitted. The City does not allocate land area/development density for commercial buildings, and as a PUD, the entire 13.25 acres are allocable toward the residential density. This would allow a theoretical maximum of 92.75 dwelling units; 60 are proposed, well under that limit. The sketch plan shows the type of basic detail anticipated at sketch plan review: enough to gain a general sense of the development proposed, but simple enough to keep the applicant's cost down at this preliminary stage of project design. The boundary between lots 1 and 2 would be adjusted slightly, apparently to keep new/proposed parking on the sites it serves. As noted, the site is still considered one lot for purposes of PUD review and development density. The access drive serving the existing office building would be retained and used for both properties. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD 14 16 StonehenaelnvestmentCorp 25 27GreenMountain Drive sketch Density As noted above, the 13.25 acres of land in the PUD yields a maximum of 92.75 housing units; 60 are proposed. 5.08 Supplemental Standards for All Commercial Districts A. Development according to commercial district regulations and multifamily development at the residential density specified for the applicable district shall be subject to site plan review, as set forth in Article 14, the purpose of which shall be to encourage innovation of design and layout, encourage more efficient use of land for commercial development, promote mixed -use development and shared parking opportunities, provide coordinated access to and from commercial developments via public roadways, and maintain service levels on public roadways with a minimum of publicly financed roadway improvements. The proposed development is an "in -fill" type of development, it is making efficient use of the land which is currently being used for parking and some undeveloped land, it is a mixed -use development which includes a shared parking arrangement, and provides a coordinated access with the adjacent office building. 1. The Board should discuss whether this criterion is being met. B. Multiple structures, multiple uses within structures, and multiple uses on a subject site may be allowed, if the Development Review Board determines that the subject site has sufficient frontage, lot size, and lot depth. Area requirements and frontage needs may be met by the consolidation of contiguous lots under separate ownership. Construction of a new public street may serve as the minimum frontage needs. Where multiple structures are proposed, maximum lot coverage shall be the normal maximum for the applicable district. The lot onto which this new building will be constructed does not have frontage on a public street, it will be served by a private right-of-way from Green Mountain Drive. The Public Works Director reviewed this access and found it to be acceptable. No new public street is recommended. C. Parking, Access, and Internal Circulation (1) Parking requirements may be modified, depending in the extent of shared parking, the presence of sidewalks or recreation paths, and residences lying within walking distance (defined as no further than one -quarter (M) mile for purposes of commercial zoning districts). Any requirements for shared access and/or parking must be secured by permanent legal agreements acceptable to the City Attorney. (2) Parking areas shall be designed for efficient internal circulation and the minimum number of curb cuts onto the public roadway. (3) Access improvements and curb cut consolidation may be required. The existing private drive serving the existing office building will be shared with the new residential building; a new spur drive leads to that new building. Parking would be both new and revised to be shared between these lots and uses. The applicant has provided information calculating the legal requirements for parking under the LDRs for both uses; a shared parking analysis showing a reduced requirement based upon information from the Urban Land Institute; and then requests a further CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD 14 16 Stonehenge InvestmentCorp 25 27GreenMountain Drive sketch reduction/waiver as authorized in the LDRs. The basics are as follows: Required parking per LDRs: 135 spaces for 60 dwelling units + 170 spaces for 48,578 sq. ft. of office space = 305 parking spaces Shared parking analysis: indicates a maximum need for 273 parking spaces Waiver requested: sketch plan proposal = 225 parking spaces (said to be a 25% waiver, but is actually 17.6% lower than the shared parking analysis suggests, and 26.2% lower than the LDR requirement). Commercial properties that abut residential districts shall provide a screen or buffer along the abutting line in accordance with Section 3.06(I) of these Regulations. This does not appear to apply here. SITE PLAN REVIEW 14.06 General Review Standards The following general criteria and standards shall be used by the Development Review Board in reviewing applications for site plan approval. They are intended to provide a framework within which the designer of the site development is free to exercise creativity, invention, and innovation while improving the visual appearance of the City of South Burlington. The Development Review Board shall not specify or favor any particular architectural style or design or assist in the design of any of the buildings submitted for approval. The Development Review Board shall restrict itself to a reasonable, professional review, and, except as otherwise provided in the following subsections, the applicant shall retain full responsibility for design. A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. (2) Parking: (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection. No parking proposed to the front of the building. (3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. There are other similarly large and tall structures in the vicinity. The applicant is seeking a 12 ft. height waiver from the 40 ft. height limit. 2. The Board should discuss this issue and determine whether this building would be compatible. (4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD 14 16 Stonehenge InvestmentCorp 25 27GreenMountainDrive sketch alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Any subsequent utility plans submitted must clarify this. C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. (1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing), landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. To be considered and reviewed in subsequent reviews; no architectural elevations are yet submitted. 14.07 Specific Review Standards A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land maybe required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Easements are proposed for pedestrian access and utilities; 3. The Board should discuss whether more substantial easements or reserved areas are appropriate or necessary. A new sidewalk is proposed following along the existing access drive, the new spur drive serving the residential building, and also connecting to an existing sidewalk in front of the office building. It is suggested that the Board consider the route and utility of this new sidewalk, as well as further connectivity leading down Green Mountain Drive toward Shelburne Road. B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities regulations. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Noted above. C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (i.e., non-dumpster, non -large drum) shall not be required to be fenced or screened. Not typically shown or considered at sketch plan review. D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. See Article 13, Section 13.06 Landscaping, Screening, and Street Trees. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD 14 16 StonehengelnvestmentCorp 25 27GreenMountain Drive sketch More detailed plans must be submitted for preliminary/final plat review. E. Modification of Standards. Where the limitations of a site may cause unusual hardship in complying with any of the standards above and waiver therefrom will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare, the Development Review Board may modify such standards as long as the general objectives of Article 14 and the City's Comprehensive Plan are met. However, with the exception of side yard setbacks in the Central District 1, in no case shall the DRB permit the location of a new structure less than five (5) feet from any property boundary and in no case shall be the DRB allow land development creating a total site coverage exceeding the allowable limit for the applicable zoning district in the case of new development, or increasing the coverage on sites where the pre-existing condition exceeds the applicable limit. As noted above, one modification requested is a height waiver of 12 feet. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Other than the site -related details described herein, there are likely no changes that would alter any prior decision that the project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD 14 16 StonehengelnvestmentCorp 25 27GreenMountain Drive sketch As noted in prior cases, some of these standards simply must be met; others are more subjective and will require more in depth analysis and review in preliminary and final plat review. The clear purpose of sketch plan review is to offer clarity and guidance to an applicant as to the likely approvability of a proposed project, and to identify any stumbling blocks and/or improvements needed at this preliminary stage of project design. All of these PUD standards should be addressed by the applicant, at least in general terms, if the Board is to be able to offer helpful guidance. The application materials are for this site only, and offer no neighborhood context by which to consider these issues (especially the proposed height waiver, and its relationship in scale to surrounding properties). It is also worth considering whether a part of the greenspace around the residential building be set aside for and actually designed for the use and enjoyment of the residents. This could include amenities such as a community garden, dog park, barbecue/picnic area, gazebo, and playground. With 60 dwelling units, at least some of these would certainly be practical and useful additions to the property; of low cost, yet high value. 12.03 Stormwater Management Overlay District (SMO) This property is located within the Stormwater Management Overlay District, and as such, must comply with relevant standards. Any subsequent, preliminary plat plans submitted should demonstrate compliance with these standards. Significant, new impervious area is being added in both building and parking. Although no stormwater plans are shown at this time, this matter is worth exploring with the applicant in at least a general sense at this early stage. RECOMMENDATION Seek clarification on the questions raised above. Respectfully submitted, f Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Copy to: Andy Rowe 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Proposed Parking Summary June 10, 2014 Parking REQUIRED Per Land Development Regulations Residential / Multi -family 2 spaces per dwelling unit plus 1 space/4 units (garage spaces assigned) 135 spaces required (60 units x 2) Commercial / Office 3.5 spaces per 1000 sf G FA 170 spaces required (48,578 sf x 3.5 spaces/1000 sf) TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 305 spaces Parking PROPOSED on Sketch Plan Resideq�Multi-family 5 rage spaces 47 surface spaces 105 spaces TOTAL (1.75 spaces per dwelling unit) Commercial / Office 120 spaces (2.5 spaces per 1000 sf GFA) TOTAL PARKING PROPOSED = 225 spaces Shared parking calculation requires a maximum of 273 spaces (see attached) p rking reduction waiver requested per Section 13.01.N.(2) L ZZs 2�3 22S 1� b �ar� Andrew Rowe From: Andrew Rowe <andy@ldengineering.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 4:24 PM To: ray (ray@sburl.com) Cc: Chris Snyder (csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com) Subject: Green Mountain Drive Attachments: Green Mountain Drive sketch 06-10-14.pdf, parking summary.pdf Hi Ray — Attached is a PDF of the revised sketch plan for Green Mountain Drive. I will have 5 full size and one 11"x17" plans delivered to your office first thing tomorrow AM. Also attached is a parking summary. This application will be requesting approval for shared parking and a parking reduction waiver. Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 878-4450 Project: 25 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT Project #: 14001 # Req'd Proposed Land -Uses Ratio Spaces] General Retail 0 sf 5 0 Office 48,578 sf 3.5 171 Medical/Dental Office 0 sf 5 0 Residential 60 units 2 135 Restaurant - Sit Down 0 sf 18 0 Restaurant - High Turnover 0 sf 18 0 Total 306 Lamoureux & Dickinson Shared Parking Calculations Date: May 30, 2014 By: R. Dickinson a.k.a. Fine/Casual a.k.a. Family Sources: South Burlington Land Development Regulations Shared Parking, 2nd Ed., ULI Weekday Shared Use Parking Hourly Ratios 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Retail 1% 5% 15% 30% 55% 75% 90% 100% 100% 100% 95% 85% 80% 75% 65% Office 0% 1% 20% 60% 100% 45% 15% 45% 100% 45% 15% 10% 5% 2% 1% Medical/Dental Office 0% 0% 90% 90% 100% 100% 30% 90% 100% 100% 90% 80% 67% 30% 15% Residential 100% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 70% 70% 70% 75% 85% 90% 97% 98% Restaurant - Sit Down 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 40% 75% 75% 65% 40% 50% 75% 95% 100% 100% Restaurant - High Turnover 1 25% 50% 60% 75% 85% 90% 100% 90% 50% 45% 45% 75% 80% 80% 80% 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 General Retail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Offices 0 2 35 103 171 77 26 77 171 77 26 18 9 4 2 Personal Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 135 122 115 108 102 95 88 95 95 95 102 115 122 131 133 Restaurant - Sit Down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Restaurant - High Turnover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 135 124 150 211 273 172 114 172 266 172 128 133 131 135 135 Maximum 273 soaces Weekend Shared Use Parking Hourly Ratios 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Retail 1% 5% 10% 35% 60% 70% 85% 95% 100% 100% 95% 90% 80% 75% 65% Office 0% 20% 60% 80% 90% 100% 90% 80% 60% 40% 20% 10% 5% 0% 0% Medical/Dental Office 0% 0% 90% 90% 100% 100% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Residential 100% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 70% 70% 70% 75% 85% 90% 97% 98% Restaurant - Sit Down 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 50% 55% 45% 45% 45% 60% 90% 95% 100% Restaurant - High Turnover 1 10% 25% 45% 70% 90% 90% 100% 85% 65% 40% 45% 60% 70% 70% 65% Weekend Required Parking Spaces by Hour 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 General Retail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Offices 0 35 103 137 154 171 154 137 103 69 35 18 9 0 0 Personal Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 135 122 115 108 102 95 88 95 95 95 102 115 122 131 133 Restaurant - Sit Down 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Restaurant - High Turnover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 135 157 218 245 256 266 242 232 198 164 137 133 131 131 133 Maximum 266 soaces P:\2014\14001\Parking\shared parking.qpw, 06/10/14 BERMAN,lit / 320A �.� PROPOSED NEW i \ ,i' SIDEWALK \ / ! / / '_ \ �` PROPOSED 60 UNIT BUILDING 15ROP1SSEDSHARED cACCESS DIVE & EASEMEN`�, . " , PROPOSED NEW DRIVE A F r -y* I � PROPOSED / �> r / NEW SIDEWALK PROPERTY / EN MOUNTAIN DRIVE ' BOLDING P '1 -1, + LOT 1 / r / EXISTING,' a r _ DING ✓,I ' \I O' r \ I PROPOSED AREA = 9.55 ACRES /! m ± ,, , \Q �� / i LOT 2 li 2 GREEN p ED AREA =10.3�3 /jCRESr''� l / GAR — / 27 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE. p EXISTING AREA = 3.70 ACRES / » o /i; / PROPOSED NEWr, PROPOSED AREA = 2.92 ACRES Z PARKIN]CSPAdItS w ' ' I � r / \ I �- �• 1, - � /„ \ /� _ _ - � L _ I ' —'` 1 9POSE0 SUBDIVISION LINE PROPOSED PARKING SUMMARY -px�_ MULTI -FAMILY — q(C /' / 58 GARAGE SPACES 47 SURFACE SPACES 105 TOTAL SPACES (1.75 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT) t • UTILIn I��rr i 1 30� - _.- i � - I I 111i ` O+ OFFICE /COMMERCIAL EAS 7 _ _ I \+ 120 TOTAL SPACES \ MENIaOCI)y \\ (2.5 SPACES PER 1000 SF GFA) •-- � "� _ --- " ` .,-� � 1 I I III ..'' - - _ _ -_ - - lrl Jill �r I -. -'— ,-. LARK INN, ¢llr/fllr/Illlll„��\ �. ,:.,.;- / /\aa Ilrl ;. .'_. r-"+.., ;. !/lll/.�((1111 ,1�\•.I � >� 1 i / /NI111111 11 r�� ,. .-.. ., 1 / .x. v ..%. / / //I llllllll if 111ACA 1Av�A1*i-. 1 � / // II / - �III I ROBERT BERMAN, LLC PROPOSED NEW I K rT ENT 2() - 320.4' S EASEM PROPOSED NEW ..... . . . . . PROPOSED 60 UNIT BUILDING SIDEWALK PROPOSED/$HARED ACCESSED CCESS PRIVE & EASEMENT PROPOSED -Z NEWDRIVE -13 0 �G 0 A IZ- P14OPOSED NffiW SIDEVYALK - - -PROPERTY t 0 LOT1 EX16TING,) co 25 GREEN MQLINTAIN DRPk BUILDING f i1 O EXISTING AREA = 9.55 ACRES a, 'PROPOSED AREA = 110.33 ACRES LOT 2 27 GREEN MOUNYAIN DRIVE 0 EXISTING AREA = 3.70 ACRES PROP SE PROPOSED AREA 2.92 ACRES 1--p rNG Z, Lu uj XURT', BDIVISION �OSED LINE bj D . ........ < 200'- NTI-o C/ F SOU UrH URL ING TON 17 �"-'---__ �- --y_. .--..�. . � �� v ...A.,III I ,I, ' is �- - - S ' .. �_�I -- - - /it 0 t 1, 1 j \T-7.y I I i 1 i I / i / r / I Z I i 1 jl I i cr ,, I I � O LOl \ 25 GREEN MqL O EXISTING AREA PROPOSED AOEP 1 I 0 1' I / Z y 1 1 I \ I I 1 / I I 4 .. � 111\I\\\\\\, II I i �� F�� !// //� I Il�li�� I11 ✓ ,�l > �Q� t �II I tl I � �a m )T 2 )UNTAIN DRIVE A = 3.70 ACRES EA = 2.92 ACRES MARY S ES WILLING UNIT) 10 SF GFA) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 6 th day of June , 2014 , a copy of the foregoing public notice for Sketch Plan [type of application] # SD-14-16 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) See attached list Dated at Essex [town/city], Vermont, this 6 th day of June , 20 14 . Printed Name: Andre we Phone number and email: 878- 45 An 1-DgMineering.com Signature: ✓"fit/--�`` Date: Jun 6, Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 Sketch Plan Application 35 Green Mountain Drive Abutter List (04-17-14) MDT Partnership, LLP 1650 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Kurt & Laura Reichelt Kurt V. Reichelt Rev. Trust 163 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 City of South Burlington c/o Planning & Zoning Dept 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 Heritage Automotive Group, Inc. 1580 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Lark Inns, LP 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert Berman, LLC 35 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 UVM-Campus Planning Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405 ray From: Andrew Rowe <andy@ldengineering.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:21 AM To: ray Cc: Chris Snyder Subject: Green Mountain Drive Hi Ray — I also left you a voice message. The plan just submitted for Green Mountain Drive is intended to supercede the plan originally submitted with the application. This plan reflects a reduction in parking for both the new multi -family building and the existing commercial office building. The reduction in parking will require the Board's approval of a combination of a shared parking arrangement and a reduction per Section 13. Chris also plans to bring a copy of an alternative plan (with parking behind the multi -family building) to present to the Board if there is an objection to the layout of the parking and building as shown on the sketch plan submitted. However, this alternative plan seems less conducive to a shared parking arrangement as the multi -family building is located in between the existing commercial parking and the new residential parking. Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 878-4450 Rai south 1 PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD- - (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) The Stonehenge Investment Corporation, Inc. 1 Lawson Lane Burlinaton. VT 05401 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #) Bk 976, pages 225-229 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 985-5722 csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com The Snyder Construction Company, LLC 4076 Shelburne Road -Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Option to purchase 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 878-4450 (P) 878-3135 (Fax) Andrew Rowe -Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex. VT 05452 5a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS Andy(PLDengineering.com , 1 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 25 Green Mountain Drive 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0720-00025 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General project description (explain what you want approval for): This application requests approval for a two lot PUD subdivision, with the existing commercial building to remain on Lot 1, and a 60 unit multi -family residential building proposed for Lot 2. The new residential building will be constructed with a parking garage on the lower level, as well as related site and utility improvements. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com b) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Existing commercial office building having an approximate footprint of 17,070 sf. c) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Proposed 60 unit multi -family residential building having an approximate footprint of 24,500 sf d) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Total building footprint area of approximately 41,570 sf e) Proposed height of building (if applicable) Proposed building ht = 52 feet (waiver requested) t) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 60 residential units proposed (none existing) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Stormwater Management Overlay District 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 4 % Proposed 4 % Lot 1 0% 19% Lot b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 23 % Proposed 28 % Lot 1 16 % 48 % Lot 2 c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 11 % Proposed 11 % Lot 1 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) 10' wide trail easement to City, 15' wide pedestrian easement to City, 30' wide utility easement to City, and various utility easements 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Extensions of the municipal water and sanitary sewer systems are proposed. Sketch Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Spring 2016 completion 13) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17" ), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adioining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledg NATU APPLICANT ti SIGNA-M OF PROPERTY OWNER tg Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: \ — I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: [:]complete ❑ Incomplete, ! r� 7 Administrative Officer bate The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Sketch Plan Application Form. Rev. i2-2oi i Sketch Plan Application 3 5 Green Mountain Drive Abutter List (04-17-14) MDT Partnership, LLP 1650 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Kurt & Laura Reichelt Kurt V. Reichelt Rev. Trust 163 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 City of South Burlington c/o Planning & Zoning Dept 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 Heritage Automotive Group, Inc 1580 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Lark Inns, LP 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert Berman, LLC 35 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 UVM-Campus Planning Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405 Lamoureux Engineers May 1, 2014 8t Dit-kinson Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 A L r Surveyors Planners Wetland & Soil Scienti RE: 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive Sketch Plan Application Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of The Snyder Construction Company, LLC to request sketch plan review for a proposed planned unit development at 25 & 27 Green Mountain Drive. This application involves a total of 13.25 acres, which originally comprised Lot 17 of the National Life subdivision. An existing office building is located at 25 Green Mountain Drive on tax map parcel 0720-00025 (9.55 acres). Tax map parcel 0720-00027 is mostly undeveloped, with only paved parking for the adjacent office building located on the 3.7 acre lot. This application proposes a boundary line adjustment and construction of a 60 unit multi -family residential building on the northerly lot. The multi -family building will have a parking garage on the lower level, as well as surface parking spaces. New parking spaces will also be constructed at 25 Green Mountain Drive, to maintain the current number of parking spaces available for the existing office building. To facilitate construction of the parking garage, a height waiver is requested for a maximum building height of 52 feet. The setbacks have been increased in accordance with Section 3.07.D.(2) of the Land Development Regulations. The existing driveway will continue to provide access to the office building and the proposed multi -family building. The northerly end of the existing parking areas will be reconfigured to define the new drive to the multi -family building. A new sidewalk will be constructed to link the multi -family building and office building with Green Mountain Drive. The proposed multi -family building will be served by municipal water and sewer service. It is anticipated that stormwater will be managed onsite with biorentention areas and infiltration basins. The project is located in the Bartlett Brook watershed and the stormwater Management Overlay District. 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802.878.4450 www.LDengineering.com ♦ Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service The following are enclosed for your review: Application for Subdivision Sketch Plan Review $2038 application fee - List of abutting landowners Please contact our office with any questions. Sincerely, Andrew Rowe P.E. c: Chris Snyder