HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0025 Green Mountain DriveCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
June 30, 1999
Brad Carter
Kessell Duff Corporation
57 Talcott Road
Williston, Vermont 05495
Re: Expanding Parking Lot, 25 Green Mountain Drive
Dear Mr. Carter:
Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project
approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning on June 29, 1999. Please note the conditions of
approval.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Syi er' ly,
q
Joe eith, Director
Plann ng and Zoning
JW/mcp
1 Encl
,H 5 �- �� - ��7
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
APPLICATION FOR
SITE PLAN REVIEW
All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the
requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your
application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission.
1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #)
ID% Systems Corporation, 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403
(802)-862-1022
2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #)
Same as Owner
3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #)
Ms. Michelle Russo (802)-864-1758 ext 6067 fax (802)-865-2689
4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:
25 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, VT
5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office)
6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a) Existing Uses on Property including description and size of each separate use)
Business occupancy, 50,000 SF
b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to
remain) Same
c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain)
50.000 SF
d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to
remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) , Existing, approx. 35' 4" _
e) Number of residential units ( if applicable, new units and existing units to remain)
None
f) Number of employees (existing and proposed)- Existing 175, proposed 222
g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested
above):
7) LOT COVERAGE
a) Building: Existing 3-01 % Proposed 3.01 %
b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc)
Existing 20.55 % Proposed 20.92 %
c) Front yard (AAg each street)
8) COST ESTIMATES
a) Building: $ 0-00
b) Landscaping: $ 0.00
Existing 10.00 % Proposed 10.00
c) Other site improvements (please list with cost):
Parking lot expansion 18,000.00
9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC
a) Average daily traffic (in and out): 190 trips in and out (existing-175 trips)
b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): 123 trips in, 3 trips out
c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out) 1 trip in, 96 tr i ps n,t
10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 7:30 am to 6::00 pm
11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday thru Friday
12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:
13) SITE PLAN AND FEE
NRovember 1999
A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five
(5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A
site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan
application (see Exhibit A).
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been
submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
REVIEW AUTHORITY: 11 Planning Commission D Director, Planning & Zoning
I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be:
(Apfrmsp)
Complete
® Incomplete
Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date
�•� 1•! W IFT� _✓ 1�1-r� �'��11 CHRD: "It='
....... Joe NO. 990E
112 S 11L" CMPCRATICN
eo tram ��e.
eO tBZ �^XYII'O9 Of
eoo�aev-noo uu a i� eer ino
PUBLIC HEARING
SOLMI BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL
In accor(Iince with Section 444 1 (c) , Title 24 the South Burlington City
Council will h)ld a puk>lic bearing at the South Burlington City 11all nference
Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Nbnday, August � , 1982
at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following:
Application by Green Mountain Power Corporation for a variance of the height
requirements of the existing zoning ordinance to allow construction of a 3-story
building ranging from 29 to 42 feet above existing grade. Property is bounded
on the north by Mc)Urit,.11n Drive, Pizzagalli Realty, and UVM, on the
by City of South Bur lin(itc>n recreation land; on the south west by Reichelt, and on
the west by Meineke Discount Muffler.
C<)pies of the application are available for public inspection
at the South Burlington City Hall.
Paul A. Farrar,
Chairman,
South Burlington
City Council
July 17, 1982
PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 3, 1982
4. Stipulations three through eight from the previous approval dated
November 10 1982 shall remain in effect.
Mr. Ewing seconded the motion.
Mr. Jacob asked what would happen if Mr. Larkin gave up his rights to
commercial use on the large lot and then were taken to court over the
residential use - he would be unable to use the lot at all. Mr. Ewing noted
that, in a case like that, Mr. Larkin could come back to the Commission to
request a change to the stipulation.
Mr. Walsh moved to amend the motion by adding the words "present and
future" between the words "his" and "rights" in stipulation #1_. Mr. Ewing
seconded the motion, but it failed with Messrs. Ewing and Walsh voting yes
and Messrs. Woolery, Jacob and Mona voting no.
The motion carried on a 4-1 vote, with Mr. Jacob voting no. He stated
that he felt an office building would be more appropriate on this site.
Sketch plan application by LTH Associates for creation of 3 commercial lots
within the previously anroved Bartlett property subdivision on Shelburne Rd.
The question of access for the three lots was discussed. Mr. Spitz
said he did not like the "handle" on lot 2. Mr. Krebs, representing LTH,
said the best lots were those with visibility from Shelburne Road and that
he would not like to see lots 1 and 2 share an access from the new road,
since that would give all the Shelburne Road visibility to one lot. Mr.
Ewing felt the access to lot 1 should be more than 150' from Shelburne Road,
particularly since the Southern Connector will be coming through this area.
He did not feel 150' was a lot of space. Mr. Spitz said the original proposal
had been for lot 2 to have a right of way over lot 1. Mr. Larkin noted that
the firm now interested in lot 1 did not like that idea. It would mean his
entrance to the lot would be 400' from Shelburne Road, and cars and trucks
would have to go up the hill to get to the access, and then down again to get
to the building. Mr. Poger said the Commission would prefer shared access.
Mr. Ewing suggested two curb cuts for lot 1 - 1 close to Shelburne Road for
entering traffic, and a second one for exiting, which could be shared with
lots 2 and 3• If this were done, the curbs on the entrance road would have
to be such that it could not be used by exiting traffic.
After further discussion, Mr. Poger stated that the entrance to lot 1
could be about 250' from Shelburne Road and that lots 2 and 3 could share
access at 400' from the road. Another way to do it would be an "in" only
curb cut for lot 1 at 200-250' from ttie road, and the shared access for lots
2 and 3. He said he would prefer the first option.
Nor. Spitz felt it was very important that whoever bought the lots was
sure they could fit the use on them with the setback and coverage recuirements
being met.
Mr. Poger noted that it was now 9:15 and that the Commission had 3
long items left. It was suggested that the last item be taken up at the
meeting next week.
Site plan and traffic criteria review of ap1,.lication by Green :Mountain Power
Corporation for an office building tc contain corporrte headquarters on
Green Mountain Drive
Mr. Spitz said the applicants had received a height variance from the
City Council at last night's meeting.
4.
PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 3, 1982
10 Mr. Perry, representing GMP, said the lot was 13.2 acres and sloped.
The building will be concrete 29' high on the north and east, and bronze
reflective glass 42' high on the south and west walls, which will be staggered.
Nor. Perry said they had had a traffic study done by Dr. Oppenlander,
in regard to the intersection of Shelburne Road and Green Mountain Drive. The
study is based on every employee driving to work every day, which probably
will not occur - there will be some carpooling and absent employees. Work
hours are 8 to 5, so GMP will not coincide with the evening peak hour of the
road, which is 4-5pm. Mr. Perry said that with the lights as they are "now,in.a few years
the level of service in the evening will drop to D with or without this develop-
ment... With,some improvements to the intersection, the level of service can
be A. He said there was room for a through lane and a right turn lane going
north, but that there would have to be some road widening for improvements
to the lanes going south. He felt the intersection could be vastly improved
with little expense, but said they felt it should be designed by the State,
since it is a State road. The Southern Connector, of course, would make
changes to this section of road also. Mr. Perry wanted to postpone discussion
of the traffic issue until the State decided what to do with the road. Mr.'
Spitz noted that the city could stipulate that the building not be occupied
until the issue was resolved. Mr. Ewing was afraid that would be hard to do,
and Mr. Poger suggested that a bond be posted for the highest estimate of the
cost of the road improvements. If it turns out that it is too much, some of
it can be returned to GMP when that is determined.
Mr. Perry said the ordinance required GMP to have 209 parking spaces.
110 are shown, with an area set aside'for more parking if it becomes needed.
Mr. Walsh asked whether the glass would reflect sunlight onto the drivers
on Shelburne Road but was told it probably would not.
Mr. Perry said GMP would like to come back when planting plans are finalized.
He was told those plans could be submitted to the Planner, but that if he
was not satisfied with them, GMP would have to come back and discuss it with
the Commission.
The question of the access road was discussed. Mr. Perry said the
Reikelt property had the right to put in a road within a 60' strip along the
border. GMP does not want to tie into that right of way. They have no idea
what use might be made of that road in the future, or whether there would
even be one, and they do not want to move their road because of it. Mir. Spitz
noted that the Reikelt property did have access from Shelburne Road. hr.
Perry noted that if there were two roads instead of both lots using one, they
would be 50' apart in the worst case. They do not want to move the planned
entrance road, because it would mean removing some trees and would change the
initial view of the building as one drove up to it. It might also mean relocating
some utilities and losing the screening between this lot and Neineke Muffler.
Mr. Perry said GMP would rather have a separate road, but if, when Reikelt built,
they would prefer to tie to the GMP road, it could be discussed at that time.
Mr. Poger said a right of way joining the Reikelt right of way to GMN could
be shown on the plan and when the property is developed, both parties could
come before the Commission to discuss it. Mr. Schner felt it would not be good
to have the back entrance to another property jointly using GMP's access to
its corporate headquarters, and 1r11r. Mona proposed dropping the idea of joining
them. This was agreed-.
I-.:r. Dore, the building architect, said the storm water would be put into
the brook in the area. There are 3 systems. The roof drains will go directly
into the brook and there will also be sheet drainage to the brook, but the
total volume of water will be reduced somewhat. Parking lot drainage will go
into catch -basins which will hold the first 112" of water. Any water above
5.
-LANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 3, 1982
that amount will go into the brook. The Commission noted that this drainage
would all end up going through the badly eroded area behind Shearer Chevrolet.
Mr. Poger said he did not wart this building to make the problem worse. Mr.
Perry said site -plan criteria did not include this issue, but Mr. Walsh felt
that the Commission's charge included looking after the safety of the city, and
that this was an unsafe area. Mr. Poger felt the City Engineer should look
into the problem. Mr. Spitz said the problem was on private property, over
which the city had no easement. Mr. Perry said GMP could slow the flow of the
water, but it could not fix a problem on private property.
Mr. Spitz said the Comprehensive Plan showed a pedestrian trail connection
from Green Mountain Drive to the city park, but that the applicant did not
like that. Mr. Perry felt the time to require a trail had been when the
subdivision was approved. He felt that if they had a trail on the land,
everyone would. be using their parking lot to get to it and it would present a
security problem to the building. He said GMP would be willing to work something
out in the future. They are having problems now with trail bikes and vandalism,
but would be willing to cooperate later. Mr. Poger said the city would like
a location shown on the plan now, and when the system is developed, this link
will join it. He suggested a floating trail, with the location to be fixed at
a later date. Mr. Perry objected that this was not a site -plan issue either.
He said GMP would like to put in the parking lot and see what use was made of
it before they had a trail in there.
Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve
the site plan application by Green Mountain Power Corporation for a buildi
on ng-
Green Mountain Drive as depicted on a Elan entitled "Green Mountain Power
Pol
orate Headquarters Building," prepared by Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw and
dated July 13, 1982, subject to the following stipulations
1. A revised storm drainage plan to include the proper material to slow
the velocity of water shall be submitted to and approved by the City
ineer prior to issuance of a building permit
2. A pedestrian trail connection to recreation land owned by the City
South Burlington shall be shown on the site plan, at a location to be
app proved by the City lanner. An easement an o fer of dedication for the
rail sha 1 be submitted to and a roved b the City Attorney rior to
issuance of a building permit.
3. Complete landscaping details and a landscaping bond shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. The area for future parking shall be revised to accurately reflect the
number of cars indicated.
5. Following discussion among the apklicant,. the City,and the Agency
of Transportation concerning improvements to the Shelburne Road and Green
Mountain Drive intersection, the Planning Commission may require a bond in
an amount to be determined by the City Planner for its share in the construction
o any needed imorovPMprf.
6. A revised site plan, containing required changes from stipulations 1
2, 3 and 4 shal e submitted o and approved by the Ci
ssuty Planner prior to
ance o a uilding permit.
6.,
PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUSTho 1 82
7. This approval expires in 6 months
k'
Mr. Jacob seconded the motion.
Mr. Perry noted that a lot of items were being required before ng'.
permit was issued, and he said they needed
a building
to begin construction soon. Mr.
Spitz said sometimes a site -work permit was issued.
The motion'carried unanimously.'.
Sketch plan aDDliC tion bu Valiant' Construction Co. for co us11:1_j day'
On. Of,
Parcels into a acre PCD on Dorset Street across from Unive sit
11
P
Mr. Jacob left at this, time, stating that he:had a corifliet.
Mr represented VL
nM
Properties, Inc., who is the'develop'errhere'
He located the area and, said'the
proposed access„was near the secondary
access to University Mall, Filve parcels 'of land
�xS
will be will be consolidated.;There
parking,spac® for 3fld^'cars. A traffic study is being done.
a
Mr. Page
said most of the green space would be near the"front of the lot, on bofiset t:
The bulk of the parking,will be in the
f; r>
middle of the lot' with ppl went
parking and service accesses'.around.;the outside'of the buildin s'
noted that
traffic at the nearest si g Poge'
gnallized intersections would have to be
studied, and upgrading
s,
of them might.be,expensive.
Mr. Woolery felt the islands would not work, and he was not sure the ^
circulation pattern was that
r,
good. Mr. Mona did not like .the parkin
arrangement. Mr. Poger did not
encourage location of a
area. grocerystore intthis
Other business
'
The Commission suggested that the Pieiiter send a letter to ;the proer
people informing them that the
work at°the Rotisserie had not been donepand
that the city would have to do it.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:40 pm.
F
Clerk
r 'c,
` p
r : r
CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 2, 1982
The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, August 2,
1982 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St.
Members Present
Paul Farrar, Chairman; Michael Flaherty, Leona Lansing, Hugh Marvin, William
Burgess
Others Present
William Szymanski, City Manager; David Minnich, Assistant City Manager;
David Spitz, Planner; Jodie Peck, Free Press; Ruth Poger, The Other Paper;
George Mona and Sidney Poger, Planning Commission; Robert Perry, John Dore,
William Schuele, Nancy Boardman, Frank Pichon, Lowell Krassner, Robert McKnight,
Barbara McNight, F.E. and C.M. Boerger, William Peter, John Belter, Ralph
Goodrich, Carl Cobb
Sign Disbursement orders
Disbursement orders were signed.
Public hearing - request by Green Mountain Power Co. for a height variance
for a new office building on Green Mountain Drive
Mr. Marvin stated that although he had been retired for several years
now, he felt it would be better if he took no part in this discussion.
Mr. Robert Perry represented Green Mountain Power and he introduced Mr.
John Dore, the project architect.
It was noted that the Council had discussed the proposed new zoning
ordinance, which contains a change in height limitations in the city, but had
not yet made a decision on that area of the ordinance. Mr. Perry said that
the existing ordinance allowed a height of 35' and that the proposed new
ordinance would allow that to be increased under several circumstances, such
as retention of green space and how the structure relates to the topography
and existing or proposed structures. He asked how, under either ordinance,
building height was measured. He said that from the north and east, this
building was 29' high, but from the west and south it was 4212", measured
from the final grade.
Mr. Perry said this was lot 17 in the National Life subdivision off
Shelburne Road, and he located the lot for the Council. He said the lot
sloped up from west to east. They propose a 3 story building, built into
the bank and they plan to leave in place some old and tall pine trees. The
entrance to the building will be on a two story side of the building.
Mr. Perry said the staggered west and south walls would be a bronze
reflective glass. They do not plan to regrade the land except where the building
is.
Mr. Perry showed the areas on Shelburne Road from where the building
would be visible. There are only 3 areas where it is visible, and when the
new plantings are mature, the building will be more hidden. In all 3 areas,
the pine trees behind the building will be visible.
Mr. Perry said the building had a gross floor area of about 18,000 sq. ft.
for 1 floor. They can either build it nto the bank, as proposed, or move it
up 20' onto the flat area on the site' Auild it in two stories. It would still
be higher than the proposal now in that case, and some existing trees would have
to be removed.
2.
CITY COUJJCIL
AUGUST 2, 1982
Mr. Perry showed pictures of the site from the locations it can be seen.
He said the building would be most visible from when a person drove in or
parked, and from those areas, it would be a two story building. The 42, height
can only be seen when the leaves are off the trees and from certain locations,
until the plantings mature.
If the building were to be expanded, another "cube" could be added to
the northwest corner.
Mr. Dore noted that GNP did not want to plan for any potential expansion
in this building, but that he had left an area for them to do so, if they
decided to in the future. If the expansion were put in, the same elevation
would be maintained.
Mr. Dore said there was a lot of flexibility built into the building for
mechanical equipment because GMP wants the building to be an energy showpiece
for a long time ahead. They will want to try new systems out here, and to do
that they need a lot of duct space for electrical and mechanical equipment.
They also have a lot of heavy steel beams and the ceilings will be 916" high,
so the floor to floor dimension will be 13'6". There will be no heating or
cooling equipment on the roof - just a skylight over the stairway 2' high, in
the middle of the roof. It will not be visible because there will be a 2'
high parapet on the building, and that is counted in the overall height.
Mr. Krassner asked about sinking the building into the ground more, and
was told that cannot be done, because of the soils. There is 20, of silty sand
and below that a watery clay. The entire building will be built on piles, and
to go down more would mean the first floor would be in the clay, and there would
be a water table problem.
The Council looked at a scale model of the building.
Mr. Farrar asked how, under the present zoning regulations, the building
height was determined. Mr. Spitz said the ordinance did not define the height.
In the past the interpretation has been from finished grade to average height.
The maximum height of this building is 42' and the average is about 38'. The
definition in the new ordinance is from finished grade and it is average height.
It was noted that the request was thus for a 3' variance.
Mr. Schuele commented that in the past, the citizens had opposed raising
height limits in the city. He was concerned ,that coming in with a variance
request before the Council decision on new height limits in the city had been
made was a way of "beating the system". He asked the Council to consider the
concerns of the citizens in the past. Ms. Lansing shared the concerns expressed.
Mr. Poger felt that the Planning Commission had laid out certain criteria, and
he felt this was a very good example of what they were talking about. He felt
that if the Council granted this variance, they would be committing themselves
to supporting this section of the ordinance.
Mr. Krassner did not like using an average height, feeling a maximum would
be better.
Mr. Schuele wondered if the building at the corner of Williston Road and
Kennedy Drive had been built in violation of the height restrictions. He was
told it had never been served with any violation papers.
Mr. Perry noted that if they moved the building to the flat area, it
would be much more visible than it would in the proposed area. He did not
feel the building would show up as a large mass, because of the staggered
walls. He added that the lot was very large and the building quite small in
comparison.
Mr. Dore said part of the reason for a 35' height limit was because of
fire equipment limitations, but that this building was easily reached for that.
Mr. Perry felt this was not a variance request, but was rather a conditional
use approval.
{
CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 2 1982
Mr. Burgess noted that if the building were moved to the flat area and
made two stories only, the visual impact would be the same as it would be as
the building is now proposed, from a height point of view. The mass would be
larger with the two story building, though. With either plan, the roof would
be on the same elevation level.
Mr. Farrar suggested that the Council discuss Section 19.112 in the
proposed new zoning ordinance, to see if they wanted to make modifications to
it. He asked if Mr. Marvin wanted to take part in this discussion, but was
told he would rather not.
Mr. Farrar felt some thought should be given to how building height would
be determined in the new ordinance. He felt that with some design flexibility,
there were some improvements which could be made over what could be done within
rigid guidelines, and he thought there was some merit in some of the
Planning Commission proposals.
Mr. Spitz said the definition of height was on page 77 of the proposal.
It is measured from the average ground level. Mr. Farrar said the wording would
allow a building with an average height of 50' to have a 55-60' exposure, and
he had a problem with that. He asked what determined a story in a building and
was told it was an occupied area or a full basement. The proposal would allow
a building 50' tall or 4 stories, regardless of whether the stories are underground
or above ground level. Neither restriction can be exceeded. Mr. Burgess felt
the legality of that should be checked.
Mr. Farrar asked the purpose of the restrictions. He was told that they were
for ease in fire protection, esthetics, and restriction of the intensity of use
of a lot, although it was pointed out that that can be done better through
restrictions on the square footage.
Mr. Farrar did not like the 50' and 4 stories provisions in the ordinance,
unless the 50' was a maximum, not an average. Mr. Poger felt the ordinance was
written for sloping areas and that the average was a way of dealing with the
slopes.
Mr. Flaherty felt the Commission should be given flexibility to deal with
specific situations. He felt the 35' height had been an arbitrary figure,
although he was uncomfortable with a 50' height. Mr. Burgess did not like the
fact that the 50' height could become 60' on some sides of a building. He
felt the 50' should be a maximum, not an average. Mr. Poger suggested changing
the definition, not the ordinance, to make that a maximum. Ms. Lansing agreed
that 50' was too high, and that a maximum instead of an average should be used.
Mr. Farrar asked if the members agreed the Commission should be allowed
some flexibility in this area and was told they did.
Mr. Farrar felt the proposed building would not be a major departure from
the present zoning ordinance requirements. He said the building could be left
as is and a berm built up around it, and it would conform, but not look as good.
Mr. Burgess asked if 42' included everything - air conditioning units,
solar panels, etc. and was told it did.
Mr. Burgess moved that the Council grant the height variance and approve
the plan of Green Mountain Power Co. for a new o ice uiIding on Green
Mountain Drive as presen e y the attorney and the -chitec an as epicted
On satin— o - .. - 13 1 .. _
D r 1D.,piect td1 • and ja!X 1 1 82 sheet 2C for ro'ect 82307,
Thy_ building shall I, a maximum of 42' at its highest point Mr. Flaherty
seconded the motion.
Mr. Farrar said copies of all the drawings used should be put on file.
The motion carried with Ms. Lansing voting no and Mr. Marvin abstaining.
January 4, 1963
John Dore
Sarent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley
1795 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear John, 0
I have still not received the revised site plan for the��-e-en:j main._
Power Power apr)lication. I do not need a cowf)lete set of as-builts or corporate -
approved Tplans at this tip.-e, but I do need a plan with the required re-
visions from the August 3 Planning Commission approval. (enclosed) as soon as
possible.
I know that you have done all the necessary work to be able to suhl'it
this information. I am hoping next week or
you can submit it within the
two so that I can close out W files.
Sincerely,
David 11. Spitz,
City Planner
DHS/mcq
Encl
cc: Robert Perry
Walter Oakes
f /
04
Gp. G Al M
P&
ACT 250 NOTICE
NOTICE OF APPLICATION ARID HEARING
10 V.S.A. CHAPTER 151
Amendment application #400094-2B was filed by Green
Mountain Power Corporation on February 18, 1983 seeking to
amend condition No. 10 of Land Use Permit #4C0094-2 which
relates to the concealment of light sources and reflector
surfaces from view substantially beyond the perimeter of the
area to be illuminated. This application seeks approval for
four separate treatments of exterior lighting;
1) Lighting of the pre -cast face of the north and east
walls of the building with incandescent ground mounted
uplight narrow spots (Type "A" fixtures).
2) Lighting the existing evergreens on the east and
northeast areas of the building consisting of low voltage
uplights, incandescent ground mounted R-40 uplights (Type
"B" fixtures) and incandescent surface mounted R-40 colored
uplights (Type "C" Fixtures).
3) General access lighting of all walkways on the east and
the northeast face of the building consisting of low profile
bollards (Type "D" fixtures), the purpose being to provide
no uplighting and keep all glare to a minimum.
4) Finally, lighting of shrubbery and evergreens on the
west face of the building for aesthetic appeal to the
occupants of the building. This will consist of several
R-40 ground mounted uplights (Type "E" fixtures).
This project will be evaluated in accordance with the
10 environmental criteria of 10 VSA, §6086(a). Statutory
parties to this application are the municipality of South
Burlington, the South Burlington Municipal Planning
Commission, the Chittenden County Regional Planning
Commission, and affected State agencies. Adjoining property
owners may participate to the extent the proposal will have
a direct effect on their property under the 10 criteria.
Other persons may participate at the discretion of the
District Commission. If you wish to participate, please
contact the Coordinator for further information before date
as specified below.
Any party can request that the District Commission hold
a public hearing on this proposal by notifying this office,
Environmental Board, State Office Building, Montpelier,
Vermont 05602 not later than March 11, 1983. If no request
for a hearing is filed, the District Commission may dispose
of the case by stipulation, agreed settlement, consent order
or default.
Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 3rd day of March, 1983.
Michael Zahner-; ct ng
District #4 Coordinator
State Office Building
Montpelier, Vermont 06502
828-3.309
bk
PIE
State of Vermont
LAND USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT
CASE No. 4C0094-2A
APPLICANT Green Mountain Power Real
ADDRESS Estate Corporation
One Main Street
Burlington, VT 05401
LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
10 V.S.A., Chapter 151
(Act 250) and
Environmental Protection
Rules, Chapter 4- Public
Buildings, Chapter 7 -
Sewage Disposal, Chapter
9 - Plumbing
District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit.
Amendment #4C0094-2A pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10
V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands
identified in Volume 126, Pages 10-12 of the land records of South
Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Green Mountain Power
Real Estate Corporation, the "permittee" as "grantee". This permit
specifically authorizes the permittee to fully complete the
construction of a 51,210 square foot, three story building with related
roadways, parking and municipal water and sewer on Lot #17 of a
previously approved 18-lot subdivision off Green Mountain Drive in
South Burlington, Vermont. This approval includes interior plumbing.
The permittee, its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by
this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved by
the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions:
1. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the
Certification of Compliance #4C0094-2A issued on November 29, 1982
by the Assistant Regional Engineer, Division of Protection, Agency
of Environmental Conservation in compliance with Environmental
Protection Rules Chapter 4 - Public Buildings; Chapter 7 - Sewage
Disposal; Chapter 9 - Plumbing. Conditions #1-4 of said
Certification are as follows:
(1) This portion of the project must be completed as shown on the
plans prepared by Sargent Webster, Crenshaw & Folley,
drawings P1 thru P6 dated 10-1-82, related 10-15-82; drawing
P7 dated 10-15-82, drawings F-1 thru F3 dated 10-15-82;
drawing 11VAC-1 thru HVAC-3 dated 10-15-82; which have been
stamped "APPROVED" by the Division of Protection except as
noted below:
A. Any water line located below grade within the building
must be kept at least 10 feet horizontally from any
waste, soil, storm or sub drain in accordance with the
national plumbing code.
4C0094-2A
Land Use Permit Amendment
Page 2
B. The 1" copper line which connects to the exterior yard
hydrants that was added after the October 1 exterior
water approval shall- be type "K" copper. In accordance
with a letter from your architect dated 11-1-82, it is
understood this line is designed for summer use only and
will be drained each fall.
No Alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where
written application has been made to the Agency of
Environmental Conservation and approval obtained.
(2) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall
remain on the project during all phases of construction and,
upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State
or local personnel.
(3) By virtue of this amendment to Certificate of Compliance
4C0094-2, condition 46 is voided but all conditions remain in
effect and will be complied with.
(4) The applicant is reminded that all plumbing material and
workmanship must meet the standards of the Environmental
Protection Rules, Chapter 9, the National Plumbing Code; and
the requirements of the Vermont Fire Preventions Section of
the Department of Labor and Industry.
Dated at Montpelier, Vermont, this loth day of December, 1982.
Members participating
in this decision:
Lincoln Brownell
Helen Lawrence
bk
BY
Michael Zahner —
cting
District Coo_ inator for the
District Commission #4
STATE OF VERMONT
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
CASE NO. 4C0094-2A
APPLICANT Green Mtn. Power ) LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
ADDRESS Real Estate Corp. ) Environmental Protection Rules
c/o Douglas Hyde ) Chapter 4 - Public Buildings;
1 Main Street Chapter 7 - Sewage Disposal;
Burlington, VT 05401 ) Chapter 9 - Plumbing
This project, consisting of the construction of an approximately 52,210 sq.
ft., 3 story office building, to be known as Green Mountain Power Corporate
Headquarters to utilize municipal water and sewer located off Green Mountain
Drive in South Burlington, Vermont, previously approved for exterior sewer and
water under Certificate of Compliance 4CO094-2, is hereby approved under the
requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions:
(1) This portion of the project must be completed as shown on the plans prepared
by Sargent Webster, Crenshaw & Folley, drawings P1 thru P6 dated 10-1-82,
redated 10-15-82; drawing P7 dated 10-15-82, drawings F-1 thru F3 dated
10-15-82; drawing HVAC-1 thru HVAC-3 dated 10-15-82; which have been stamped
"APPROVED" by the Division of Protection except as noted below:
A. Any water line located below grade within the building must be kept
at least 10 feet horizontally from any waste, soil, storm or sub drain
in accordance with the national plumbing code.
B. The 1" copper line which connects to the exterior yard hydrants that was
added after the October 1 exterior water approval shall be type "K"
copper. In accordance with a letter from your architect dated 11-1-82,
it is understood this line is designed for summer use only and will be
drained each fall.
No alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where written application
has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained.
(2) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall remain on the
project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made
available for inspection by State or local personnel.
(3) By virtue of this amendment to Certificate of Compliance 4C0094-2, condition
#6 is voided but all conditions remain in effect and will be complied with.
(4) The applicant is reminded that all plumbing material and workmanship must
meet the standards of the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 9, the
National Plumbing Code; and the requirements of the Vermont Fire Preventions
Section of the Department of Labor and Industry.
Certificate of Compliance
4C0094-2A
Page 2
Dated this 29th day of November, 1982 in the Town of Essex Junction, Vermont.
FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION
ct:"L� F,
Jam F. Agan, PE
Ass tant District Administrator
Ernest P. Christianson
District Administrator
JFA/bmg/EPC
cc: P. Howard Flanders, PE
Mike Zahner
City of South Burlington
R. John Dore, AIA
Health Department
Fire Prevention
Bob Accorsi
enc..
-/4f
STATE OF VERMONT
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
CASE NO. _49-a0A---- - ) LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
APPLICANT Green Mtn. Power ) Environmental Protection Rules
ADDRESS Real state'Corp. ) Chapter 4 - Public Buildings;
c/o Douglas Hyde ) Chapter 7 - Sewage Disposal;
1 Main Street ) Chapter 9 - Plumbing
Burlington, VT 05401 )
This project, consisting of the construction of an approximately 52,210 sq.
ft., 3 story office building, to be known as Green Mountain Power Corporate
Headquarters to utilize municipal water and sewer located off Green Mountain
Drive in South Burlington, Vermont, previously approved for exterior sewer and
water under Certificate of Compliance 4CO094-2, is hereby approved under the
requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions:
(1) This portion of the project must be completed as shown on the plans prepared
by Sargent Webster, Crenshaw & Folley, drawings P1 thru P6 dated 10-1-82,
redated 10-15-82; drawing P7 dated 10-15-82, drawings F-1 thru F3 dated
10-15-82; drawing HVAC-1 thru HVAC-3 dated 10-15-82; which have been stamped
"APPROVED" by the Division of Protection except as noted below:
A. Any water line located below grade within the building must be kept
at least 10 feet horizontally from any waste, soil, storm or sub drain
in accordance with the national plumbing code.
B; The 1" copper line which connects to the exterior yard hydrants that was
added after the October 1 exterior water approval shall be type "K"
copper. In accordance with a letter from your architect dated 11-1-82,
it is understood this line is designed for summer use only and will be
drained each fall.
No alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where written application
has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained.
(2) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall remain on the
project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made
available for inspection by State or local personnel.
(3) By virtue of this amendment to Certificate of Compliance 4C0094-2, condition
#6 is voided but all conditions remain in effect and will be complied with.
(4) The applicant is reminded that all plumbing material and workmanship must
meet the standards of the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 9, the
National Plumbing Code; and the requirements of the Vermont Fire Preventions
Section of the Department of Labor and Industry.
Certificate of Compliance
4C0094-2A
Page 2
Dated this 29th day of November, 1982 in the Town of Essex Junction, Vermont.
JFA/bmg/EPC
cc: P. Howard Flanders, PE
Mike Zahner
City of South Burlington ;J
R. John Dore, AIA
Health Department
Fire Prevention
Bob Accorsi
enc.
FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION
a �.Ln o1 F q.0 A J
Jam F. Agan, PE
Ass tant District Administrator
Ernest P. Christianson
District Administrator
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: South Burlington City Council
FROM: David H. Spitz, City Planner
RE: Next Week's Agenda
DATE: July 30, 1982
1). Green Mountain Power Headquarters
This proposal is currently being reviewed by the Planning Commission.
However, one aspect of the proposed building must go to the City Council
under interim review powers.
The proposed building is "21-2" stories high, i.e.. 2 stories at the higher
elevations and 3 stories further down the hill. The number of stories
complies with both old and new zoning provisions, but the total height
does not conform with the existing ordinance.
The tallest portion of the building is 42 feet above existing grade.
Average height is approximately 38 feet. The existing ordinance permits
35 feet, and the proposed ordinance allows 50 feet under certain conditions
(_enclosed).
The applicant is prepared to present several sketches and photographs.
to describe the visual impact of the proposed building
2). Meineke Muffler
This application has been withdrawn.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: South Burlington City Council
FROM: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
RE: Green Mountain Power Building, Green Mountain Drive.
DATE: July 29, 1982
I have field checked the site of this proposed building
and find that the topography of the land is such that a building,
as proposed, will have little or no visual impact on the area.
The building will be situated in an area where the south and
east exposure is surrounded by an existing mature growth, most
of which exceeds the proposed building height.
The building will also be a great asset to the City.
Respectfully submitted,
William ymanski
City Manager
R. John Dore
Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley
1795 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Dore,
Your application for a dimensional variance has
Council's August 2 meeting. The meeting will begin
of the applicant should plan to attend the hearing -
DHS/mcg
July 19, 1982
been scheduled for the City,
at 8:00 P.M. A representative
Sincerely,
David H. Spitz,
City Planner
t"
State of Vermont
x _ LAN® USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT
CASE No. 4CO084-2
APPLICANT Green Mountain Power Real
ADDRESS Estate Corporation
One Plain Street
Burlington, VT 05401
LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
10 V.S.A., Chapter 151
(Act 250) and Environ-
mental Protection
Rules Chapter 4, Public
Buildings, Chapter 7
Sewage Disposal, Chapter
9-Plumbing EXCEPTION,
EXTERIOR SEWER/AND WATER
AND FOUNDATION PLUMBING
APPROVAL ONLY
District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit
Amendment #4C0084-2 pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10
V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands
identified in Volume 126, Pages 10-12 of the land records of South
Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Green Mountain Power
Real Estate Corporation, the "permittee" as "grantee". This permit
specifically authorizes the permittee to construct a 51,210 square
foot, three story building with related roadways, parking and municipal
water and sewer on Lot #17 of a previously approved 18-lot subdivision
off Green Mountain Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. Approval, at
this time is limited to site and foundation work only.
The permittee, its assigns
this permit to complete and
the District Commission in
1.
2.
and successors in interest, are obligated by
maintain the project only as approved by
accordance with the following conditions:
The project shall be completed as set forth in Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law #4C0084-2, in accordance with the plans and
exhibits stamped "Approved" and on file with the District
Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions
of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without
the written approval of the District Environmental Commission.
By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the
permittee confirms and agrees for itself and all assigns and
successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall
run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be
binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns
and successors in interest. The granting of less than an
undivided whole interest in this project is prohibited without
prior approval of the District Environmental Commission.
#4C0084-2
Land Use Permit Amendment
Page 2
3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing
jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may
periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit
certifying that the project is being completed in accordance with
the terms of the permit.
4. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the
Certification of Compliance issued on October 13, 1982 by the
Assistant Regional Engineer, Division of Protection, Agency of
Environmental Conservation, in compliance with Environmental
Protection Rules Chapter 4, Public Buildings, Chapter 7 Sewage
Disposal Chapter 9, Plumbing EXCEPTION EXTERIOR SEWER /AND WATER
AND FOUNDATION PLUMBING APPROVAL ONLY. No further construction
involving the installation of interior plumbing is permitted until
a revised Certification of Compliance is issued by the Division of
Protection and this permit has been amended to incorporate said
Certification.
5. The permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall
install and maintain water -conserving plumbing fixtures, including
but not limited to low -flush toilets, low -flow showerheads, and
aerator -type or flow -restricted faucets.
6. The heated structure approved herein shall be constructed with
insulation with an R-Value of at least R-10 in the exterior walls,
at least R-15 in the roof, and at least R-8 around the foundation
or slab and shall comply with ASHRAE 90-80 standards.
7. The permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall
continually maintain the landscaping substantially as approved in
Exhibit #12 by replacing any dead or diseased plantings as soon as
seasonably possible.
8. The permittee shall comply with Exhibits #17 and 47 for erosion
control. Hay bale dams shall be installed as depicted on the
plans prior to commencement of construction and within 24 hours of
grading of slopes and drainage swales. From October 1 to April 15
of any calendar year, all non -vegetated disturbed areas of the
construction site shall be mulched until final vegetative cover is
established. All erosion control devices shall be periodically
cleaned, replaced, and maintained until vegetation is permanently
established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission
reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to
review erosion control, and to evaluate and impose additional
conditions with respect to erosion control, as they deem
necessary.
9. The permittee shall provide a copy of the Temporary Pollution
Permit to the District Environmental Commission prior to
commencement of construction of paved roadways and parking lots
and the stormwater collection system.
N
#4C0084-2
Land Use Permit Amendment
Page 3
10. All outdoor lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a
manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from
view substantially beyond the perimeter of the area to be
illuminated.
11. No further subdivision of any parcels of land approved herein
shall be permitted without the written approval of the District
Environmental Commission.
12. Prior to any site work, the permittee shall install and maintain
fencing along the tree line to be retained and around trees to be
retained as depicted on Exhibit #12.
13. The permittee shall apply and maintain calcium chloride on all
roadways within the project during construction and until paved to
control dust. The District Environmental Commission reserves the
right to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to
dust control.
14. The District Commission requires the permittee to work out a
mutually agreeable solution with all concerned parties for the
intersection of Green Mountain Drive and U.S. Route 7 by April 1,
1983. This agreement shall be incorporated into this Land Use
Permit through administrative amendment. In addition, the
Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and impose
further conditions regarding traffic safety and congestion.
15. The permittee shall submit final design plans for the entrance
sign to the District Commission for review and approval prior to
installation.
16. All construction on this project must be completed by October 15,
1983.
17. This permit shall expire on October 12, 2022, unless extended by
the District Commission.
18. Notwithstanding, this permit shall expire one year from date of
issuance if the permittee has not demonstrated an intention to
proceed with the project.
Dated at Montpelier, Vermont, this 13th day of October,_ 1982.
B Y
Piichael Zahner, Ac ' g
District Coordin' or for the
Members participating District Commission #4
in this decision:
Lincoln Brownell
Helen Lawrence
STATE OF VERMONT
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
CASE NO. 4C0094-2 ) LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
APPLICANT Green Mtn. Power ) Environmental Protection Rules Chapter
ADDRESS Real Estate Corporation
4 - Public Buildings; Chapter 7 - Sewage
C/o Douglas Hyde ) Disposal,.Chapter 9 - Plumbin 1 Main Street g (exterior
sewer/water and foundation plumbing
Burlington, VT 05401
approval only
This project, consisting of the construction of an approximately 52,210 sq.
Headquarters to utilize municipal water and sewer located off Green
ft., 3 story office building, to be known as Green Mountain Power Corporate Drive in South Burlington, Vermont, Mountain
is hereby approved under the requirements of
the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions:
(1) This portion of the project must be completed as shown on the plans prepared
by Sargent Webster, Crenshaw & Folley drawing AD2-1 dated September 3, 1982,
revised September 3, 1982 (rec'd 10-5-82), supplemented by Drawing JD-2
dated 9-24-82; drawing AD2-2 dated 9-3-82, revised 9-3-82; drawing P.1 dated
10-1-82 and drawing P.2 dated 10-1-82,,and which have been stamped "APPROVED"
by the Division of Protection except as noted below.
IA r_ "fhe 2" vent from 3" underground waste shall be installed at a 45, angle
to vertical teference section 6-B on Plan P-1). 1B the 4" vertical vent stack
does not comply with the plumbing code. As presently indicated on Plan P.5�
designed on a dead end and horizontal below the floor rim of the ground
floor fixtures (reference Section G.7 on Plan P-1).
No alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where written application
has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained.
(2) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall remain on the
project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made
available for inspection by State or local personnel.
(3) The project is approved to obtain potable water from the Champlain Water District
provided the water line extension is constructed in accordance with the
Department of Health's "Letter of Approval" dated October 6, 1982, and issued
to Walter Oakes, Director Corp. Services, Green Mountain Power Corp.
(4) A professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont, is to supervise
the installation of the exterior wastewater collection system and water supply
system, and upon completion of construction, but prior to the occupancy of
any building, the engineer is to make written certification to the Division
of Protection, stating all work was completed in accordance with the stamped
approved plans.
(5) In association with Condition #4 stated above, the engineer's certification is
to include, but not be limited to, the dates of inspections, items inspected,
and the results of infiltration/exfiltration testing of the manholes, gravity
sewer collection system, and water distribution system.
Certificate of Compliance
4CO094-2
Page 2
(6) Prior to the construction of any additional floors, final, complete and
satisfactory plans for the interior waste and water distribution plumbing
and interior ventilation for each floor are to be submitted to, and written
approval received from, the Division of Protection.
(7) The applicant is reminded that all plumbing material and workmanship must
meet the standards of the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 9, the
National Plumbing Code; and the requirements of the Vermont Fire Preventions
Section of the Department of Labor and Industry.
Dated this 13th day of October, 1982 in the Town of Essex Junction, Vermont.
FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION
is F. Agan, E
stant Region Engineer
Ernest P. Christianson
District Administrator
JFA/bmg/EPC
CC: P. Howard Flanders
Mike Zahner, Coordinator
City of South Burlington
R. John Dore, AIA
Health Department, Harold Sargent
Fire Prevention
Bob Accorsi, Pizzagalli Construction Co.
enc.
STATE OF VERMONT
DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
RE: Green Mountain Power Real Application #4C0084-2
Estate Corporation Findings of Fact and
One Main Street Conclusions of Law
Burlington, VT 05401 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151
(Act 250)
On July 16, 1982, an application for an Act 250 permit
amendment was filed by Green Mountain Power Real Estate
Corporation, One Main Street, Burlington, Vermont, for a
project generally described as the construction of a 51,210
square foot, three story building with related roadways,
parking and municipal water and sewer on Lot #17 of a
previously approved 18-lot subdivision off Green Mountain Drive
in South Burlington. The tract of land consists of 13.24 acres
with 13.24 acres involved in the project area. The applicant's
legal interest is ownership in fee simple described in a
Warranty Deed dated August 20, 1975.
Under Act 250, projects are reviewed based on the 10 criteria
of 10 V.S.A. §6086(a)1-10. Before granting a permit, the Board
or District Commission must find that the project complies with
these criteria and is not detrimental to the public health,
safety or general welfare.
Decisions must be stated in the form of findings of fact and
conclusions of law. The facts we have relied upon are con-
tained in the documents on file identified as Exhibits #1-50,
and the evidence received at a hearing held on July 30, 1982.
At the end of the final hearing, the proceeding was recessed
pending submission of additional information. The hearing was
finally adjourned on October 8, 1982 upon receipt of all of
this additional information.
Parties to this application are:
(A) The Applicant by Walter Oakes, Robert Perry, Esq., and
John Dore, A.I.A.
(B) The Municipality of South Burlington.
(C) The South Burlington Municipal Planning Commission.
(D) The Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission by
Arthur Hogan, Executive Director.
(E) Agency of Environmental Conservation by Dana
Cole -Levesque, Esq.
#4C0084-2
Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law
Page 2
GENERAL DISCUSSION:
The applicant has waived the requirement that the participating
members of the District #4 Environmental Commission sign this
Land Use Permit, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
In making the following findings, we have summarized the
statutory language of the 10 criteria of 10 V.S.A. §6086(a):
FINDINGS OF FACT
10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 §6086(a)
1. The project as proposed will not result in undue water
or air pollution:
AIR POLLUTION:
a. There will be no process emissions, noxious odors or
noise pollution from this project.
b. The structure will be heated with internal heat pumps
backed up by an electric hydronic heat storage system,
which will not cause undue air pollution.
WATER POLLUTION:
Subcriteria (A) , (D) , (E) , and (F) are not applicable to
this project.
(B) Waste Disposal:
a. Sanitary waste will be disposed of through connection
to Bartletts Bay Sewage Treatment Plant in South
Burlington. The City Manager of South Burlington has
stated that the municipal sewage treatment plant has
sufficient reserve capacity for the additional
projected flows. Exhibit #23. A Certification of
Compliance has been issued by Division of Protection,
which the Commission accepts as evidence that the
disposal of wastes into the municipal system meets
applicable State Health Regulations for this project
and will not cause undue water pollution. Exhibit
#50.
b. The parking lot for 110 cars will have a storm
drainage system designed in such a way that the first
one-half inch of stormwater runoff will be treated by
catch basins designed to remove floatable and
#4CO084-2
Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law
Page 3
settleable solids prior to discharge to groundwater.
The remaining portion of stormwater, approximately 4
cubic feet per second in a 25 year storm condition,
will be directed towards the drainageway along the
southeastern portion of the property instead of to
the municipal system along Green Mountain Drive in
accordance with the recommendations of the City
Manager. Exhibits #17 and 23.
C. The roof area which consists of approximately 18,000
square feet will be drained internally and will also
be piped to the southeasterly drainage gully.
d. A Temporary Pollution Permit shall be required by the
Agency of Environmental Conservation.
e. The South Burlington Landfill can accommodate the
anticipated solid waste from the project. Exhibit`
#23.
f. All stumps will be disposed of on -site above the
seasonal high water table or at a State approved
landfill to prevent groundwater pollution.
(C) Water Conservation:
a. Water -conserving plumbing fixtures (including
self -closing faucets, low flush toilets and minimum
flow showerheads) have been specified for the
structure. Exhibits #17 and 43. The applicant has
agreed to require the ongoing maintenance of these
fixtures.
b. The Commission accepts the above as evidence that
water conservation has been considered in the design
of the project and that provisions have been included
for the continued efficient operation of these
devices.
2-3. There is sufficient water available and no existing water
supply will be unreasonably burdened:
a. The project will be served by municipal water from
the Champlain Water District. The Commission accepts
the letter (Exhibit #21) from the Champlain Water
District that there is sufficient water available and
the project will not restrict nor encumber present
consumers.
#4C0084-2
Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law
Page 4
4. There will be no unreasonable soil erosion or effects on
the capacity of the land to hold water:
a. The project site consists of large open grassed
areas, high mature stands of pine trees and some new
growth of saplings and brush.
b. Temporary soil erosion controls are depicted on
Exhibits #13, 17, and 47. They consist of hay bale
barriers every 50 feet on center through all drainage
swales, temporary seeding and mulching of all
disturbed areas during construction, temporary
seeding, mulching and hay baling of stockpiled
topsoil. Temporary construction slopes shall not
exceed 2:1 and will be seeded and mulched. The
slopes along the temporary construction road shall
also be seeded, mulched, and hay baled as deemed
necessary by the construction engineer.
C. Permanent erosion controls consist of final grading
and landscaping by May 15, 1983. Cut slopes shall
not exceed 3:1 and fill slopes 4:1. Topsoil shall be
spread to a six inch thickness and a loam seed
mixture specified in Exhibit #17 shall be applied in
the Spring of 1983.
d. The Commission finds that if the above mentioned
methods are implemented as planned, that undue
erosion should not result.
5. This project will not cause unreasonable safety or
congestion conditions with respect to highways or other
means of transportation:
a. Access to Green Mountain Drive is from U.S. Route 7,
at its intersection with Bartlett Bay Road and Green
Mountain Drive. Both approaches on Shelburne Road
have left turn and through/right turn lanes. Traffic
flow is regulated by a traffic signal with three
phase operation and the posted speed limit is 40
miles per hour.
Mr. Joseph Oppenlander has completed a Traffic Impact
Study, Exhibit #44, relating traffic conditions
expected from.the Green Mountain Power building to
existing and projected traffic conditions. He
calculates the current levels of service at the
subject intersection at level "B" in the morning peak
W4C0084-2
Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law
Page 5
hour and "C" during the afternoon peak hour. With
the project, the level of service does not change for
the morning peak, however, the level for the
afternoon peak hour reduces from "C" to "D" both for
1983 and 1988.
Mr. Oppenlander has concluded that improved signal
timings and lane arrangements would upgrade the
service level at all times to "A". To accomplish
this, he has recommended a two phase signal with two
lanes for through and through/turning traffic each
way, which can be accomplished by construction of a
tapered extra lane for southbound traffic immediately
south of the intersection. Reference is made to
pages 11 and 16 of the study for the report
conclusions. Exhibit #17.
The applicant is currently working with the South '
Burlington Planning Commission towards a solution to
these traffic problems based upon the final
conclusions and recommendations of Mr. Oppenlander's
traffic study. The District Commission reserves
judgment under this criterion until an agreeable
solution has been worked out between all concerned
parties. The final agreement regarding this
intersection shall be incorporated into this Land Use
Permit by way of administrative amendment prior to
April 1, 1983. The Commission also reserves the
right to schedule public hearings and impose
additional conditions with regard to traffic safety
and congestion.
b. Sight distances are more than adequate for the access
point on Green Mountain Drive.
C. The 110 parking spaces are adequate for the demands
of the project.
6-7. There will be no unreasonable burdens on educational or
other municipal services:
EDUCATION:
a. There is no measurable impact on educational services
resulting from this project.
tt4C0084-2
Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law
Page 6
MUNICIPAL SERVICES:
a. Municipal services to be provided to the project
include municipal water and sewer connections and
Police and fire protection.
b. The City Manager, the Police Department, the Fire
Department, and the Planning Commission for the City
Of South Burlington have indicated the project will
not unreasonably burden the municipal services which
will be provided to the project. Exhibits #21, 23,
31, and 33.
C. The City Manager has indicated that the South
Burlington Landfill can accommodate the anticipated
solid waste generated by this project. Exhibit #23.
d. The fire chief has reviewed fire -fighting plans for
the project (Exhibit #30) and has given approval
conditional upon final inspection of the system.
Exhibit #31.
e. The City Manager for South Burlington has stated that
city facilities have the reserve capacity to
accommodate the added water demand and sewage flows.
f. The Commission accepts the above as evidence that
undue burdens on the municipality will not result.
8. There will be no unreasonable adverse effects on
aesthetics, scenic beauty, historic
areas: sites or natural
a. Historic sites, necessary wildlife habitat and rare
and irreplaceable natural areas will not be affected
by this project.
b. The project will be landscaped as outlined on
Exhibits #7 and 12. The applicant has agreed to
continually maintain the landscaping as approved.
The existing vegetation on the site consists mainly
of white pine, black cherry, beech, birch, and maple.
Every effort will be made to ensure that all except a
very few trees shall remain intact and shall be
incorporated into the landscape architectural design.
All new planting materials will be of the same
species that are found on the site and Vermont in
general, with the introduction of several flowering
cultivars as noted on the site plan. Exhibit #12.
#4Coo84-2
Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law
Page 7
C. Exterior lighting will consist of pole mounted
fixtures with concealed light sources and will be
installed to provide night lighting for entrance
drive and parking areas.
d. The building itself is triangular in shape, the
southwestern wall is entirely faced with
high-technology reflective glass, the north and
southeastern walls are made of precast concrete
panels, which will be bush -hammered to expose the
aggregate of natural Vermont redstone. The stepped
structural configuration which will also help to
lessen the visual impact of the building upon the
site. This glass wall mirrors the view, the trees,
and the fields, and the building itself to create an
image that changes with the seasons and the angle
from which it is seen. Exhibit #17.
�'. A lighted entrance sign will be located near Green
Mountain Drive. The design for the sign shall be
submitted to the District Commission for review and
approval prior to installation.
f. All utilities will be supplied underground.
g. Trash containers will be located inside the building
near the service entrance.
9. The project is in conformance with the Capability and
Development Plan:
Subcriteria (H), (K), and (L) are not applicable to this
project.
(A) Impact of Growth:
a. The City of South Burlington has identified no undue
burdens on any facilities or services.
b. The Commission finds that the municipality will be
able to accommodate the total growth and rate of
growth that will result from this project which
involves the replacement of existing facilities with
no additional employees.
(B) Primary Agricultural soils.
v v11.5:
a. The project is located on soils Adams and
Enosburg/Whately, which do
agricultural soils not qualify as primary
since the site has severe
#4C0084-2
Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law
Page 8
limitations for cultivation due to established
vegetation and excessive slopes in some areas. The
plateau development site is not considered large
enough to support or contribute to a viable economic
agricultural operation. The University of Vermont
Horticultural Farm has indicated that the proposed
project will not have an adverse impact on the farm
based upon a review of the preliminary plans dated
July 13, 1982. Exhibit #37.
(C) Forest and Secondary Agricultural soils:
a. The soils on the site do qualify as forestry or
secondary agricultural soils which could contribute
to present or potential commercial forestry.
However, the project is planned to preserve the
majority of the trees found on the site and, as such,
the project will not significantly reduce the present
or future potential for commercial forestry.
(D) Earth Resources:
a. There are no significant earth resources on the
property.
(E) Extraction of Earth Resources:
a. This project does not involve the extraction of any
earth resources.
(F) Energy Conservation:
a. The heating and cooling system for Green Mountain
Power Corporate headquarters will be a de -centralized
water source heat pump system. In operation thermal
energy is transferred between individual heat pump
units and a water heat sink. The water heat sink is
piped in a loop with each heat pump connected. With
this layout individual units serving internal heat
gain areas can transfer unwanted heat via the loop
water to perimeter heat pumps requiring heat. In
series with the loop water are the heat add and heat
rejection equipment. During the warm weather when
100% of the building requires cooling, an industrial
cooler will reject loop water heat to the outdoors.
In extreme cold when the internal heat from people,
lights, and computer operations are inadequate to
supply the perimeter zones heat will be added to the
loop water by means of an electric thermal storage
heater. The storage heater heats during off peak
times and exchanges heat to the loop water when
required.
ff4C0084-2
Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law
Page 9
The thermal storage heater serves two other systems,
domestic water and ventilation. The ventilation
system introduces outdoor air requirements of the
building during occupied hours. Ventilation air is
tempered by hot water coils. Domestic water is
heated and stored at design supply temperatures.
Systems are microprocessor controlled programmed to
monitor and control space temperatures, loop water
temperatures, power demand, ventilation, and other
energy management functions.
The building envelope U values meet ASHRAE code
90-1980. Roof insulation is planned as three-inch
rigid styrofoam over membrane roof system. "R" value
for roof is R-15.
Wall insulation is planned as two-inch thick rigid
styrofoam within cavity wall.
is R-10. "R" values for walls
Building layout and geographical location affords a
system capable of recovering rejected internal space
heat. The de -centralized heat pump design with
computer control has proven to be a low operating
cost system. Adequate internal heat makes solar
energy unjustifiable. Passive heating is not
required. Glass is reflective to reduce summer solar
gains. Low capital investment and operating costs to
make this the best suited mechanical system for the
Green Mountain Power Corporate headquarters building.
There is no plan to use any resistive type electric
heating in this building. Exhibit #17.
b. Based upon the above, the Commission finds that the
planning and design of the building reflect the
principals of energy conservation and incorporate the
best available technology for the efficient use or
recovery of energy.
(G) Private Utility Services:
a. The private utilities proposed for the project are
driveways and parking areas and the stormwater
collection and treatment system.
(J) Public Utility Services:
a. The public utility services required for this project
include electricity.
#4C0084-2
Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law
Page 10
h. The Commission accepts the letter from Green Mountain
Power Corporation as evidence that it can provide
utility service to the project, that an excessive or
uneconomic demand will not be placed on such
facilities or services, and that the provision of
such services has been planned on the basis of a
projection of reasonable population increase and
economic growth. (Exhibit #40).
10. The project is in conformance with the local or regional
plan:
a. The South Burlington Planning Commission has
indicated that the project conforms to the local
plan. Exhibit #41.
b. The Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission.
has indicated that the project conforms to the
Regional Plan.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, it is the conclusion
of this District Environmental Commission that the project
described in the application referred to above, if completed
and maintained in conformance with all of the terms and
conditions of that application, and of Land Use Permit
#4C0084-2 will not cause or result in a detriment to public
health, safety or general welfare under the criteria described
in 10 V.S.A. §6086(a) and that, pursuant to such section, a
permit is therefore issued.
Dated at Montpelier, Vermont, this 13th day of October, 1982.
BY
Michael Zahner, tin
District Coor 'nator for the
District Commission #4
Members participating
in this decision:
Lincoln Brownell
3elen Lawrence
F((� -.
(rreeiq M,P&O
r
State of Vermont
LAND USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT
CASE No. 4C0094-2B LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
APPLICANT Green Mountain Power
ADDRESS Real Estate Corporation 10 V.S.A., Chapter_ 151.
One Main Street (Act 250)
Burlington, Vermont 05401
District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Perni.it:
Amendment #400094-2B pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10
V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands
identified in Volume 126, Pages 10-12 of the land records of South
Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to the Green Mountain
Power Real Estate Corporation, the "permittee" as "grantee". This
permit specifically approves four separate treatments of exterior
lighting;
1) Lighting of the pre -cast face of the north and east walls of
the building with incandescent ground mounted uplight narrow spots
(Type "A" fixtures).
2) Lighting the existing evergreens on the east and northeast
areas of the building consisting of low voltage uplight,
incandescent ground mounted R-40 uplights (Type "B" fixtures) and
incandescent surface mounted R-40 colored uplights (Type "C"
fixtures).
3) General access lighting of all walkways on the east and the
northeast face of the building consisting of low profile bollards
(Type "D" fixtures), the purpose being to provide no uplighti_ng
and keep all glare to a minimum.
4) Finally, lighting of shrubbery and evergreens on the west
face of the building for aesthetic appeal to the occupants of the
building. This will consist of several R-40 ground mounted
uplights (Type "E" fixtures).
The permittee, its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by
this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved by
the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions:
1. The project shall be completed as set forth in Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law #400094-2B, in accordance with the plans
and exhibits stamped "Approved" and on file with the District
Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of
this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the
written approval of the District Environmental Commission.
4C0094-2B
Land Use Permit Amendment
Page 2_
2. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal_, the
permittee confirms and agrees for itself and all assigns and
successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall
run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be
binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns
and successors in interest.
3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing
jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may
periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit
certifying that the project is being completed in accordance with
the terms of the permit.
4. All construction on this project must be completed by October_ 15,
1983.
5. This permit shall expire on October 12, 2022, unless extended by
the District Commission.
6. Notwithstanding, this permit shall expire one year from date of
issuance if the permittee has not demonstrated an intention to
proceed with the project.
Dated at Montpelier, Vermont, this 16th day of March, 1983.
B Y ���j' / ��j -' ✓� j���.
Michael Zahne,r Acting
District Coordinator for the
District Commission #4
Members participating
in this decision:
Lincoln Brownell
Helen Lawrence
bk
STATE OF VERMONT
DISTRICT E14VIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
RE: Green Mountain Power Application #4C0094-2B
Real Estate Corporation Findings of Fact and
One Main Street Conclusions of Law
Burlington, Vermont 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151
05401 (Act 250)
On February 18, 1983, an application for an Act 250 permit
amendment was filed by Green Mountain Power Real Estate
Corporation for a. project generally described as the the
installation of four separate treatments of exterior lighting;
1) Lighting of the pre -cast face of the north and east
walls of the building with incandescent ground mounted
uplight narrow spots (Type "A" fixtures).
2) Lighting the existing evergreens on the east and
northeast areas of the building consisting of low voltage
uplight, incandescent ground mounted R-40 uplights (Type "B"
fixtures) and incandescent surface mounted R-40 colored
uplights (Type "C" fixtures).
3) General access lighting of all walkways on the ea.st and
the northeast face of the building consisting of low
profile bollards (Type "D" fixtures), the purpose being to
provide no uplighting and keep all glare to a minimum.
4) Finally, lighting of shrubbery and evergreens on the
west face of the building for aesthetic appeal to the
occupants of the building. This will consist of several.
R-40 ground mounted uplights (Type "E" fixtures).
Based upon a review of the application, and the receipt of no
adverse comments from any party, the District Environmental.
Commission finds that there will be no undue, unreasonable or
adverse impacts resulting from the project as amended herein,
under any of the 10 environmental criteria of 10 V.S.A.
§6086(a) 1 through 10.
4C0094-2B
Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law
Page 2
CONCLUSION OF LAW
It is the conclusion of this District Environmental Commission
that the project described in the application referred to
above, if completed and maintained in conformance with all of
the terms and conditions of that application, and. of Land Use
Permit #4C0094-2B will not cause or result in a detriment to
public health, safety or general welfare under the criteria
described in 10 V.S.A. §6086(a) and that, pursuant to such
section, a permit is hereby issued.
Dated at Montpelier, Vermont, this 16th day of March, 1983.
Michael Zahngr,cting
Environmental Board Coordinator
for the District Commission #4
Members participating
in this decision:
Lincoln Brownell
Helen Lawrence
bk
LEGAL NOTICES
PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTH BURLINGTON
CITY COUNCIL
In accordance with Section
4443(c), Title 24 the South Burling-
ton City Council will hold public
hearing at the South Burlington Ii
City Hall, Conference Room, 575
Dorset. Street, South Burlington,
Vermont on Monday, August 2,
1982 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the
following:
Application by Green Mountain�I
Power Corporation for a variance
of the height requirements of the
existing zoning ordinance to allow
construction of a 3-story building
ranging from 29 to 42 feet above
exl5iing grade. Pr opertY is
bounded on the north by Green
Mountain Drive, Pizzagolli Real-
tv, and UVM, on the southeast by
City of South Burlington recrea.
Lion land; on the southwest by Re-
ichel), and on the west by Meineke
Discount Muffler.
Copies of the application are
available for public inspection at
the South Burlington City Hall.
Paul A. Farrar.
Chairman,
url South Bington
-City Council
July 17, 1982
DW
2/10/84
MOTION OF APPROVAL
That the South Burling' -on Planning Commission approve the final plat application
of Green Mountain Powers Corporation for a two lot subdivision (original lot #17
of National Life) as depicted on a plat entitled "Green Mountain Power Corporation
Corporate Headquarters - location plan" prepared by Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw
and Folley, dated March 22, 1983 revised January 10 and 25, 1984, subject to
the following stipulations:
1) That Green Mountain Power Corporation reserve a 24 foot right-of-way to parcel
#2 (3.8 acre parcel).
2) That the final plat be recorded within 90 days.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
July 26, 1999
Brad Carter
Kessel/Duff Corporation
30 Kimball Avenue -
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: im, 25 Green Mountain Drive, Sewer Allocation
Dear Mr. Carter:
an additional sewer allocation of 564
Please be advised that the City of South Burlington approvesplease note, however, that there is
gpd for a total of 3,330 gpd for the above referenced property.
currentlyno capacity available at the City's Bartlett Bay Treatmentavailable. The building may not be
l
is a
564 gpd will be placed on a waiting list until sufficient capacity
occupied with more than 175 employees until sufficient capacity is available.
Should you require further information, please let me know.
Sincer y,
Joe eith, Director
Planning & Zoning
JW/mcp
PUBLIC 1 {EARI NG
SOUTH BURL I NGT'ON PLANN T NG C'OMM I SS I ON
The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the
South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington,
Vermont on Tuesday, Pehruary 14, 1984, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the
following:
Final plat application of Green Mountain Power Real Estate CorpQratiQn for a
re-subdivison of lot #17 of the National Life subdivision into two parcels, a
8.7 acre parcel and a 4.5 acre parcel. Property in question is located at #25
Green Mountain Drive, bounded by properties of Kurt Reichett, Mark Hill Investments,
Pizzagalli Realty, University of Vermont and City of South Burlington.
Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the
South Burlington City Hall.
Sidney B. Poger
Chairman,
South Burlington
Planning Commission
January 28, 1984
The 41 ijjc'u,.e gy�T,
U
ei-a:,:ction. Thi* is one
on
V r-A Sl to 82,
73
0011, j
-Z4-
11/16/83
DW
e • • :.�ii%�il
That the South Burlington Plannifig C ission approve the final plat application
of Isadore Myers for a two lot ivis' n located at Dorset and Swift Streets, as
depicted on a plan entitled "P an sh wing proposed 2 lot s division - Myers
property , Dorset Street, Sou h Burl ngton, Vermont, 8.8 c es." as prepared by
Warren Robenstein dated Sept r 19 3 with the follow' g stipulations:
1) That the use be that pr posed an approved by t Zoning Board of Adjustment
on 11/14/83.
2) That the lot located at Dorset nd Swift Stre t be served with municipal sewer
and water.
3) That final plat be recorded witlin 90 day .
4) Sewer allocation or the propos d proje t shall be 300 g.p.d. in accordance
with the sewer polic jdeveloped by he Pl ning Commission.
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE PERMIT AMErIDMENT
INSTRUCTIONS:
User -this form for all Land Use Permit amendments, including permit transfers.
Applications for permit transfers are to be completed by the transferree.
SECTION I -
I FOR OFFICE USE OfIL-T—
Application # 400094-2B Filing Date:
Laws Involved: Deemed Complete By:
Cost: —# of lots: _2Fee:
Deed: V01.a2fa- Page(s) 0_12
SECTION II - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT
05401
1. APPLICANT: GPIP Real Estate Corporation, Green Mountain Drive, So. Burlinatori VT
NAME ADDRESS PHONE864-5731
2. PROPERTY OWNER: (-amp)
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
3. PERSON TO BE CONTACTED ABOUT THIS APPLICATION (Complete only if different than #1):
Rnhe_,-t J P.O. Box 2323, South Burlington, VT 05402 863-4558
4. ,'HAT IS YC! LE' L INTEREST IN THIS PROPERTY? attornev for owner
5. IF YOU, ARE NOT FILING THIS APPLICATION AS AN INDiV DUAL, C M?LETE THE F LL WIN :
corporation Jul 30, 1974 Vermont
Tl.egal Entity date formed St. Date Reg. in VT
6. WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THIS REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE PERMIT:
Bp-sllbdi,dsion of rgt 17 of the National Life subdivision into two parcels an 8.7 acre parcel containing the Green Mountain Power corporate headquazters
7.
ECTION
and a vacant_pIrcel southerly and easterly thereof containinq 4.5 acres.
DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES IN THE FOLLOWIN+, ITEMS FROM INFORMATION IN THE ORIGINAL
APPLICATION
a. Acreage in the entire tract of land N/A
b. Acreage in this project N/A
c. Date the project will be started --N,/A
d. Date the project will be completed N/A
e. Funding or bonding of this project -IVA
f. Municipal services to be used NlL
II - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED ON PERMIT TRANSFERS
I hereby agree to complete this project as set forth in the application, Findings
of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the Land Use Permit # and as
amended above: Transferree)
9. TRANSFERROR:
I hereby agree to the transfer of Land Use Permit # as set forth
above: Transferror'
SECTION V - NOTICE T P RT ES - T BE COMPLETED BY LL PLICANTS FOR ACT 250 PROJECTS
10. This app ication must be signed by the applicant. By signing t is application
the applicant assumes responsibility, for the information provided and, when the
amendment involves Act 250, confirms that the town selectmen, Planning Commission
and Regional Planning Commission were given a copy of the application as
required. GIP REAL, ESTATE CORPORATION
Si ure of App icant
SELLER:
Name:
STATE OF VERMONT
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
DIVISION OF PROTECTION
RETAINED
[Rec'd
OR OFFICE USE ONLY
ermit #
ate AppTication
APPLICATION FOR DEFERRAL OF PERMIT
(Pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Environmental Protection Rules)
alP Real Estate Corporation Name:
Address: Green Mountain Drive Address:
Burlington,South 5401
town state zip town state zip
Tel.No.: (802) 864-5731 Tel.No.:
EE: $ 5.00 (A $5.00 fee is required unless the deferral is a gift.)
JURISDICTION:
A. Parcel to be Conveyed: (Pursuant to §3-06.A. of the Environmental Protection Rules)
Location: Town: South Burlington Road/Highway: Green Mountain Drive
Description of Subdivision (acres or sq.ft & dimensions): 8.7 acres
Is this parcel improved?
no X yes; if yes, with what? UT corporate headquarters
If it is improved with a house, when was it constructed?
(See "C" below)
date
Is there plumbing and/or sewage disposal facilities on the parcel?
Is the land contiguous to other lands of the buyer? retained Parcel
B. Retained Parcel: (Pursuant to §3-06.B. of the Environmental Protection Rules)
How many acres is the remaining parcel after the parcel described in "A" is conveyed?
4.5 acres.
If the parcel is more than ten (10) acres, do not complete this section.
Is this parcel improved? X no yes; if yes, with what?
(see "C" below)
If the parcel is not improved and is less than 10 acres you must also complete a
"Retained" Deferral of Permit application.
C. If any parcel is improved with a structure, the useful occupancy of which requires
plumbing and sewage disposal facilities, it can not be subdivided with a Deferral
of Permit.
I. If either parcel is improved with a structure built or under construction on
March 5, 1973, you must comply with /3-04 of the Environmental Protection Rules
in order to be considered exempt.
2. If either parcel is improved with a structure built after March 5, 1973, the
parcel must comply with s3-10 of the Environmental Protection ules prior to
conveyance.
Contact your district environmental office for more information. A copy of the
above cited sections of the rules is attached.
D. Act
If this conveyance creates the loth parcel or more, less than 10 acres in size created
within a 5 mile radius within any 10 year period, you should obtain a Project Review
Sheet from the District Coordinator before completing this application.
RECORDING OF PERMIL (Pursuant to §3.05 of the Environmental Protection Rules)
Deed reference of land being subdivided: Book 126 Page(s) 10-12
All subdivision and deferral of permits shall be filed by the applicant on the town re-
cords within 30 days of receipt unless the applicant has appealed the decision, and prior
to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of the permit. The terms and
conditions of deferral of permits shall run with the land and be binding upon each owner
or lessee.
ACCURATE TO THE
MY
I HEREBY THATHAT OEGOING FORMATION HEREIN MAYTBOEFGROUNDSWGE.
I UNDERSTANDAND THAFOR
PERMIT REVOCATION, PENALTY, OR BOTH. C
/i 3 aP
a e ture o persons conveying t e -an - - - - - - -
-
' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHT (Pursuant to §3-06 of the Environmental Protection Rules)
TMPnRTANT: PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING - AN ATTORNEY CAN NOT SIGN FOR YOU.
I hereby certify that I have read and understand the provisions of §3-06 of the Environ-
mental Protection Rules, and do voluntarily waive my right to develop this lot as provided
therein. I am aware that a Deferral of Permit prohibits the construction or installation
of any structure, the useful occupancy of which would require the installation of plumbing
and sewage treatment facilities on the lot. A parcel purchased under the provisions of
this section may not be resold unless a subdivision permit is obtained, or the waiver of
developmental rights is included in the deed or lease and notice of the purchaser's name
and address is filed with the Division prior to conveyance. I understand that if the lot
does not meet the standards and requirements of these Rules, a permit will be denied and
no building term
o f any Contr�acteofeSaletor.Leasefurthermore
shall becertify
includedthat
inthe
theodeeditransfer-
shall
be made a term of any
ring this lot.
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENTAL RIGHTS
"In order to comply with the State of Vermont Environmental Protection
ntRulehalls n not
the
subdivision of lands and disposal of waste including sewage,
the construct or erect a structure or building on the parcel of land conveyed herein, the
useful occupancy of which will require the installation of plumbing and sewage treatment
facilities or convey this land without first complying with said State regulations. The
grantee by acceptance of this deed acknowledges that this lot may not qualify for approval
of development under the appropriateapplication environmental
o develop protecthe tion or health regulations and
that the State may deny any
iHess
Date urchaser ate
Witness) (Date) Purchaser (Date)
LIST OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
NAME
1. Kurt Reichelt
2. Mark Hill Investments, Inc.
3. Pizzagalli Realty Co.
4. University of Vermont
5. City of South Burlington
ADDRESS
Pine Haven Shores
Shelburne, VT 05482
c/o Meineke Muflers
5 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05401
50 Joy Drive
South Burlington, VT 05401
c/o Lee Liggett, Esq.
Waterman Building
Burlington, VT 05405
c/o William Scymanski
City Manager
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05401
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT
1) Name of Applicant GMf ,,;
1
2) Name of Subdivision 16 T l Wd I N A� L'
3) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record,
applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer
since preliminary plat application: ry,
4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units,
property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental
timetable, since preliminary plat application: V !30u/V/,g
5) Submit four copies of a final set of plans consisting of a final plat plus
engineering drawings and containing all information required under section
202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section
204.1(a) for a major subdivision.
6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under section 202.1
(11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and
under section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision.
"' GMT RC�G Es?iF7'B
(Signature) applicant or contact person
Z. i J"An/ fyrr¢
Date
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer
Re: Next week's agenda items
Date: 1/20/84
2) Brosseau-Williams, Seasonal Aoua Park, lots 1-2, Gregory Daughers, Industrial Park
Zoning Board of Adjustment granted conditional use approval on January 3, 1984.
Proposed is to occupy lots 1 & 2 of Gregory Industrial Park, combination of lots
total 3.7 acres.
As a requirement of the Act 250 permit a deceleration lane from the entrance to the
crest of the hill must be constructed. Blinking warning sign at the top of the
hill and at the botom of hill warning of the entance must be installed.
Fire Chief Goddette wants the fire hydrant on Williston Road which was removed to be
replaced anywhere between the entance and Bill Szymanski's house.
Cost of improvements (deceleration lane, curbs and road) estimated at $60.000. Two
curb cuts are proposed, suggest that the first curb be designed to prevent left turning
movements, plus provide oneway traffic flow. Entrance should be signed. Southerly
opening should be a minimum of 24 feet wide to allow two way movements. Sewer alloc-
ation for entire industrial park is 2000 g.p.d. with 300/400 g.p.d. estimated for
proposed use. Traffic impact 80 trips a week day and 220 trips weekends, these are
estimated numbers.
See City Engineer's comments.
3) Alan Palmer, Phase II, office complex, 20 Kimball Avenue
Planning Commission granted extension of phase II to June 1, 1984. Planning Commission
may grant an increase in height of a structure according to Section 18.112 of Zoning
Regulations. Additional story will provide 3780 square feet of floor area.
Dimensional requirements must be increased, see sub section c of Section 18.112.
Required and existing dimensions are as follows:
existing minimum required
setback 78' 40'
rear yard 80' 30'
side yards south side - 80' 15'
north side - 81'
Proposed overall height is 44 feet
Should Planning Commission consider the required, a motion of approval is all that
is necessary. Planning Commission may want to tie this to a building start of no
later than June 1, 1984.
4) Green Moutain Power
Request is a subdivision of the original lot #17 of National Life subdivision. Total
lot size being 13.2 acres. Lot #1 will contain 8.7 acres and will be the Green
Mountain Power lot. Lot #2 will contain 4.5 acres will be underveloped at this time.
Memorandum
Next week's agenda items
January 20, 1984
Page 2
Lot #2 will have no frontage. Access will be via the existing 24 feet private drive-
way. Section 18.109 of zoning regulations will apply, a permanent easement of at
least 20 feet in width is required. Green Mountain Power should reserve a right-of-
way across lot #1 should the property transfer at a later date.
5) Bordeau/Rye
No additional comments, as of Friday (1/20/84) no meeting between the developer
and Fire Chief. Understand one will take place before Tuesday's meeting.
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer
Re: Next week's agenda items
Date: 2/10/84
2) Green Mountain Power Cor=oratio
The 3/4 acre piece of land is now included with the Green Mountain Power office
building lot. The applicant has requested a development deferral permit from
the Enviromental Commission.
The right-of-way to the second lot is the only concern. G.M.P. should reserve
a 24 foot right-of-way. I see no problems with theis proposal.
3) Traffic Counts Old Farm Road and request to close off Old Farm Road
Traffic counts were completed on three different days between the hours of 2:30
and 4:00 P.M. These hours are considered the best for maximum trips within the
area. Reason being that Ditital Equipment Corporation operates on a flex -time
schedule, this means that no employee is allowed to report to work later than
9:00 A.M. nor may any employee depart the plant earlier than 1:00 P.M.
Digital informs me that the bigger percentage of employees depart the plant
between 2:30 P.M. and 3:30 P.M. Of the three counts the greatest number of trips
headed southerly on Old Farm Road was 14 between the hour of 2:30 - 3:30 P.M.
In a northerly direction on Old Farm Road the greatest number was 15 trips.
On January 30, 1984 the count included all directions, trip counts were as
follows: easterly on Kimball Avenue 166: westerly 66: northerly on Old Farm
Road 15 and southerly 9 trips.
Between 2:30 and 3:30 P.M. the school buses made a minimum of 2 trips on Old
Farm Road which were included within the totals. On all three days the road was
clear of snow and no problems were observed. Attached is a copy of a letter
submitted to the City Council, dated January 9, 1984.
4) Vie, 1075 Hinesburg Road
Parcel in question contains 25.8 acres with 964.9 feet frontage. Two lot sub-
division is proposed, one lot 10.2 acres with 423.4 feet of frontage (presently
occupied by a two family dwelling) the second lot contains 15.6 acres with
541.5;foot of frontage. Area is zoned Industrial/Agricultural requiring a
10 acre minimum lot. The 15.6 acre parcel is undeveloped. No problems should
result from the proposal.
5) University Mall
Proposal is similar to that proposed a year ago. Two phase expansion plan,
phase one consists of a new building for Martins of 48,000 square feet existing
23,000 square feet. Phase two consist of demolition of Hilson and present
Martins with expansion of the mall plus a new Hilson's, total construction of
189,091 square feet.
January 31, 1984
Attorney Robert Perry
P.O. Box 2323
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Green Nau:ntain Power subdivision
Dear Bob:
Be advised that the South Burlington Planning Ccmnikission will hold a public
hearing at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Tuesday,
February 14, 1984 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the request of Green Mountain
Power for a two lot subdivision.
If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me.
Very truly,
Richard Ward,
Zoning Administrative Officer
Rw/ncg
��
_.... _ ... __
.;j... .._. _ .... _. _ .... ... .. ... .. ..
. ... _.. _. _
i"
f.... _.. __ _. _. .._.. _.. ,. .
_..__ _._..
_y.t , . _. _, . ___. _.. _ _. ......_ _... __.. ... __
.. .,..._ _.. _... ....
_�.I _.. ._. _. .. _.... .._ _. ..... .......____... _. _.._
a
PLANNING COMIMISSION FEBRUARY 14, 1984
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday,
February 14, 1984 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St.
Members Present
George Mona, Vice Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Judy Hurd, John Belter, William
Burgess
Members Absent
Sidney Poger, Chairman; Peter Jacob
Others Present
Richard Ward, acting Planner; Jim Cheng, Free Press; Pat Burgmeier, The Other
Paper; Robert Perry, Duncan & Olivia Brown, Mary Roy, Gwendolyn & Arthur Rye,
Tim Brisson, Gene Beaudoin, Dave Miller, Edwin Granai, Robert Ryan, Ethan Sims,
Dorothy Sims, John Caulo, William Schuele, Lowell Krassner, Gardner Hopwood,
Sylvia Smith, George Khouri, Dennis McElroy, Albert Audette, Superintendent of
Streets
Minutes of January 24, 1984
On page 5, there should be no "c" in Aquifer.
Mrs. Maher moved to approve the January 24, 1984 minutes as corrected.
Mrs. Hurd seconded the motion and all voted for it.
Public hearin., final plat application fob Green Mountain Power Real Estat
Division for two lot subdivision of lot ,1117, of original -National Life
subdivision, 25 Green Mountain Drive, Attorney Robert Perry
Mr. Ward said the plan had been revised to meet the concerns of the
Commission. Mr. Perry said he thought that it could be a condition of
approval that the right of way location could be changed contingent on the
future approval or development of the 3.8 acre lot.
Mrs. Y aher moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission apl)rove
the final plat application of G.M.P. Real Estate Corporation for a two lot_
subdivision original lot T17 of National Life as depicted on a plat entitled
"Green Mountain Power Corporation Corporate Headquarters - location plan"
prepared by Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw and Folley, dated I':arch 22, 1983,
revised January 10 and 25, 1984, subject to the following stipulations:
1. That the Green Mountain Power Corporation reserve a 24 foot ri ht of
way to parcel #2 3 8 acre parcel). The east 150' shall be subject to relocation
on site-ol.an a�)proval for the 3.8 acre parcel.
2. That the final plat be recorded within 90 days.
Mr. Belter seconded the motion, which carried with ,r. Burgess abstaining because
he had missed the majority of the preser,tation, which occurred at the last
meeting.
Consider request from residents of Old Farm Road to close road, petition
Presented to City Council
Mr. Duncan Brown spoke for the residents. tie said the city had first
PLANNING COMMISSION
3.
JANUARY 24, 1984
Mrs. Maher said she could not vote for this plan. She thought it was
regrettable that only 4 members were present to hear the application, because
she felt it was unfair to the applicants not to have a full commission. She
said the park would be used during the summer and would attract children on
bikes on a road that is terrible. She felt the Zoning Board had made a mistake
in approving this. She felt it would have more traffic than the original
industrial use and would produce bike and pedestrian traffic, which will be
very dangerous. She did not feel the deceleration lane would mitigate the danger.
She liked the use and would like to have it in South Burlington, but not in
this location. Mrs. Hurd added that eventually the other 4 lots would have
industrial uses and she was not sure it would be good to have a recreation area
in the middle of an industrial area. Mr. Poger noted that approval of this
use might affect what was allowed on the other lots .
Mr. Poger said he wanted to see a sidewalk, a change in the geometry of
the access drive so busses could use it if necessary, and a 320' deceleration
lane. Mrs. Maher felt a sidewalk would only be helpful if it extended over
the hill to the next intersection. Mr. Poger said the Commission could not
require that, but it might ask that the city put such a walk on its highest
priority list.
Mr. Ward suggested that the traffic report be reviewed.
Mr. Belter moved to continue the public hearing on the seasonal aqua
park until February 14, 1984 at 7:30 pm at City Hall.__ Mrs. Hurd seconded the
motion and it carried with Mrs. Maher abstaining.
Consider request of Alan Palmer, 20
imball Abenue to construct phase II at a
feet, in accordance_ with Section 18.112 of the
Zoning Regulations
Mr. Mona came in at this point.
Mr. Ward said the front of the building now was 33' overall and the back
is 44' overall. The proposed new addition to the west of the building would be
one story higher than the existing building. Mr. Poger said the section of the
regulations in question had been intended to allow another story to be built
into a sloping ground, for example, so the roof line would remain the same,
but more space could be added. He did not feel this fit the criteria. VX .
Mona added that the existing building already looked high and he did not want
to add another story.
No one spoke in favor of granting the request.
Sketch plan review, Green ?Mountain Power (RJeal Estate Division) for two lot
subdivision of lot #17 of the National Life subdivision
Mr. Perry represented Green Mountain Real Estate. He said that the
new headquarters building was now complete and that for tax reasons the
construction financing was being rolled -over through a limited partnership
leasing arrangement. That involves a purchase option. The investor does
not care about the entire parcel of land, and it is Green Mountain's opinion
that in that case, why should they have an option to purchase it? They
would therefore like to separate a 4.5 acre piece of land on the east and
a 3/4 acre piece over the bank. Access to the 4.5 acre piece would be over
the existing drive serving the GMP building, cutting through the north end
of the parking lot. This would involve a minor landscaping change. There is
no plan to develop or sell this piece at this time, although there Night be
a request in the future to develop an office building on the site. The land
might be donated to the city. He said the large piece was flat, but the small
one was totally unbuildable.
4.
PLANNING COMMISSION
JARUARY 24, 1984
Mr. Belter asked about the coverage on the remaining GMP lot and was told
it would still be well within the coverage limits. It was also noted that
there would still be room for building expansion to the north and parking lot
expansion if needed.
Mrs. Maher did not feel it was a good idea to attach the 3/4 acre piece
to the 4.5 acre one, because all it would be used for would be added density.
She felt that small piece should be with the office building lot. Mr. Perry
said it did not relate to either lot and was just excess baggage with either.
He mentioned that the city owned land next to that small piece, and they might
want to swap, or they might want to put a trail across it. Creating 3 separate
lots was mentioned, but no one wanted that. No one objected to setting off
the 4.5 acre piece, and attaching the small lot to the GMP building lot.
Continue public hearing on Bourdeau/Rye property, 28 unit planned unit develop-
ment Mr. Gerald Milot and Mr. Daniel J. O'Brien
Mr. Milot said he had met again with the fire chief and they had come
to a compromise. The road width in sensitive areas has been widened to allow
30' between parked cars. Some of the buildings were shifted slightly and
two areas were added with sub -base, gravel and topsoil. These will be seeded
and the owners will have to maintain them. Another fire hydrant has also been
added.
Mrs. Maher moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve
the final plat application of Gerald Milot and Daniel J. O'Brien for a 28
unit planned unit development as depicted on a plat entitled "Bourdeau Rye Properties"
Final Plat prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., dated October 1983 with
revisions dated October '83, November '83, December '83, and January 24, 1984,
subject to the following stipulations:
1. That the balance of the legal documents be submitted to the City
Attorney for approval prior to issuance of a building permit.
2. That a sidewalk be provided from the corner of Kennedy Drive to the
entrance of the development, with the developer working with the City Manager
regarding site improvements and cost.
3. That the recreation fee in the amount of S200.00 per unit be paid
prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. Sewer allocation shall be 7,250 gallons per day in accordance with
the sewer policy developed by the Planning Commission.
5. That a performance bond for utilities in the amount of S20,000 and
for landscaping in the amount of $8,000 be posted prior to a request for
building permits.
6. That snow fences be erected and maintained during construction around
the existing vegetation that is to be saved.
7. That a graveled access drive be installed to the northerly property
line to provide emergency access to Georgetown.
8. Stipulations 1, 2 and 3 of a letter dated 1/24/84 from the South
Burlington Fire Chief to Richard Ward shall be part of these stipulations.
Mr. Mona seconded the motion and all voted in favor.
January 27, 1984
Katherine vose
District Environmental Commission
III West Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Re: Green Mountain Power aubdivision
Dear Mrs. Vose:
Be advised that the South Burlington Planning Cbng"'ission will consider the
final plat application of Green mouj-,tain Power for a two lot subdivision of
lot #17 National Life subdivision on Tuesday, February 14, 1984.
This proposal Conforms with the City's Comprehensive plan, I foresee no pro-
blems with it being approved.
Very truly,
Richard Ward,
7A)niM Administrative Officer
RK/n)og
cc: Attorney Robert Perry
LEGAL NOTICES S
PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTH BlJkLINGTON
PLANNING COMMISSION
The South Burlington Plan-
ning Commission will hold a pub -
lie hearing at the South
Burlington City Hall, Conference
Room, 575 Dorset Street, South
Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday,
February 14, 1984, at 7:30 P.M.
to consider the following:
final plat application of
Green Mountain Power Real Es-
tate Corporation for a re -subdivi-
sion of lot # 17 of the National
Life subdivision into two parcels,
a 8.7 acre parcel and a 4.5 acre
Pareal. Property in question is
aeated at #25 Green Mountain
Drive, bounded by properties of
Kurt Reichott, Marie Hill Invest-
ments, Pizzagalli Realty, Univer-
sity of Vermont and City of South
Burlington.
Copies of the application are
available for public Inspection
at the South Burlington City Hall.
Sidney B. Pager
Chairman,
South Burlington
Planning Commission
January 28, 1984
PAYMENT GUARANTEE
WHEREAS, GMP Real Estate Corporation has received site
plan approval for construction of an office building on Lot 17
off Green Mountain Drive from the City of South Burlington
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, final approval was subject to an assessment
for highway improvements at the Route 7 - Green Mountain- Drive
intersection in the fore of a letter of credit;
FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION RECEIVED, GMP Real
Estate Corporation hereby promises to pay to the City of South
Burlington a base sum of Five Thousand and no/100 Dollars
($5,000.00) to be increased by five percent (5%) per year on a
non -compounded basis, added on the annual anniversary date of
this guarantee, within fifteen (15) days of demand for payment
by the municipal manager of the City of South Burlington,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Said sum shall be used only for roadway improve-
m6nts at the intersection of Shelburne Road (U. S. Route 7) and
Green Mountain Drive in the City of South Burlington. Improve-
ments shall not include maintenance costs.
2. Demand for payment shall not be made until
commencement of construction.
3. In the event demand has not been made prior to
November 1, 1987, the South Burlington Planning Commission shall
review the contribution requirement and either terminate the
obligation or continue the obligation for an additional term not
to exceed five (5) years.
The foregoing guarantee shall not be subject to any
defenses or setoffs except those arising from conditions number
1, 2 and 3 above.
DATED at Burlington, Vermont, this 3rd day of
November, 1982.
GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
By:�tA
Duly Authorized Ag
2 -
PLANNING COMMISSION
25 OCTOBER 1988
PAGE 2
1. A $450, 1 year landscape bond shall be posted prior to
permit.
2. The trailer shall be more than 50 feet from the road.
3. The site shall drain toward the south.
4. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or
this approval is null and void.
Approval of this application is based on expressed represen-
tation of the applicant that: 1. no more than 10 boats shall
be allowed in the front display area, 2. no maintenance or
repair service will be performed at this site, 2. no access-
ories shall be stocked or sold at this site, 4. the maximum
lengthcf this business at this location is 14 months.
Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
3. Site plan application of Green Mountain Power Corp. for
n costruction of a 61 space parking lot expansion to the
facility located at 25 Green Mountain Drive.
Mr. Soter said the new spaces will result in a total of 187.
The need is based on 174 employees in the building now as
opposed to/107 when the original lot was built. The lot will
be screen and 4 new decashield lights (downcast luminere)'
will be added. The floodlights will be removed. Mr. Craig
questioned whether the Commission formula was wrong so that
the original approval didn't have enough spaces. Mr. Belter
recalled the applicant had said they would start small and
add parking as needed. Mr. Soter added they would lose no
trees by the parking lot expansion.
Mr. Dickinson spoke on the question of drainage. He said the
grassed island forms a divider for drainage, to the east on
one side, the west on the other. It appears that all water
goes into the ground before it leaves the site. A culvert
will be put in under the road to the new parking lot. They
have raised the culvert as high as possible, allowing them to
maintain as much undisturbed area as possible. Any disturbed
area will be restored. They hope to achieve a very gentle
swale and maintain a nicely grassed area. Mr. Weith noted
the plan has been presented for study to Heindel & Noyse, but
their report has not yet been received.
Mr. Belter raised the question of impact fees for Shelburne
Rd., noting that the applicant acknowledges more employees
and additional office space. Mr. Craig suggested the Planner
look into this. Mr. Burgess and Ms. Peacock felt that if the
PLANNING COMMISSION
25 OCTOBER 1988
PAGE 3
applicant did intersection improvements originally, it was OK
but if not, some sort of fee based on additional use should
be considered. Members felt they wanted to review the
original approval before voting on a motion.
Ms. Maher moved to continue this site plan until the next
meeting. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
4. Public Hearing. Preliminary Plat application of Marie
Underwood and Helen Gagnon for subdivision of 3 one -acre lots
from the 141 acre Nowland parcel located on Spear Street
Mr. Underwood noted the property is on the east side of Spear
St. There would be a 60 ft. right-of-way to the remaining
property. All three properties would use city water and
sewer. They will close the small access on lot #2. Mr. Poger
asked about reserving a view area on the ridge. Mr.
Underwood said this property is nowhere near the view ridge.
Mr. Weith said that as a matter of procedure, the recorded
plan needs to show the entire 140 acre parcel and abutting
property owners. Mr. Craig noted there was a requirement
that the driveways as they enter lots 2 and 3 had to be 100
ft. back from the road. Mr. Underwood noted there will be a
private right-of-way, graveled. Lot owners will have an
easement.
Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Pfelim-
inary Plat application of Marie Underwood and Helen Gagnon
for subdivision of three one -acre lots from a 141 acre parcel
as depicted on a plan entitled 114 lot subdivision for the
Nowland Estate," prepared j?y Palmer Company, Ltd, and dated
October 3, 1988 with the following stipulations:
1. The Plan shall be revised prior to final plat to include
the following:
a) the location of the water main
b) the entire 141 acre parcel with lot line dimensions and
the names of all abutting property owners
c) a note indicating that access to lots 2 and 3 shall be
from the 50 foot right-of-way
d) a note indicating that access to lot 1 shall be at least
250 feet from the 60 foot right-of-way located between
lots 2 and 3, driveways to these lots shall be at least
100 ft. from the Spear Street right-of-way
e) a note indicating that existing driveway into lot 2 will
be closed upon development of the parcel.
2. The applicant shall pay the $200 per unit recreation fee
prior to permit.
PLANNING COMMISSION
The South Burlington
meeting on Tuesday, 1
Conference Room, City
Members Present
1 NOVEMBER 1988
Planning Commission held a regular
November 1988, at 7:30 pm, in the
Hall, 575 Dorset Street.
William Burgess, Acting Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher,
Catherine Peacock, Ann Pugh, William Craig, John Belter
Also Present
Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Jon
Soter, Michael Murphy, Lance Llewellyn, Dennis Blodgett,
Robert Rochefort, Jane Milner, Monica Farrington, Al
Mansfield, Constance Snyder, Rod Whittier, John Barsanes,
Buddy Coffrin, Karen Unsworth
1. Minutes of 11 October 1988
On p.l, last paragraph, the first sentence should read "near
Williston Road" instead of "on Williston Rd." In the same
paragraph, the 3rd sentence should read "meets the require-
ments," instead of "exceeds the requirements."
Ms. Peacock moved to approve the Minutes of 11 October as
amended. Ms. Pugh seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
1. Continuation of Site Plan application of Green.Mountain
Power Corp•'for construction of a 61 space parking lot -ex-
pansion to the headquarters facility located at 25 Green
Mountain Drive
g
Mr. Weith outlined the 2 remaining issues: what type of
intersection improvements GMP contributed to in 1982 and
whether an impact fee could be addressed for this expansion.
He said that in 1982 there was a payment guarantee by which
GMP promised to chip in $5,000 to improvements at Shelburne
Rd. and Green Mountain Dr. At that time, improvements to
Shelburne Rd. from Imperial Dr. south were not in the State 5
year plan. This stipulation was to be reviewed in November,
1987, but this was not done. The State is planning to
improve Shelburne Rd. at that intersection, although timing of
this project is uncertain. Mr. Weith said the state is
planning improvements at the Green Mountain Dr. intersection.
He also looked into other projects on Green Mountain Drive
that occurred after the 1982 approval, and GMP wasn't re-
quired to chip in for those. Mr. Belter asked if a new
project wouldn't have to contribute to a Shelburne Rd. impact
fee. Mr. Weith said they would, based on the number of trip
ends. Mrs. Maher said GMP has gone from 107 to 174
employees, and the Planning Commission didn't have those
figures in 1982. Mr. Soter asked whathappens with the $5,000
which has expired but which is renewable. Mr. Murphy said
PLANNING COMMISSION
1 November 1988
PAGE 2
his concern was for the future. If they have a layoff, would
they get a rebate on what they contributed. A poll of the
Commission revealed t_h_P fnl 1 fltoi — -..Am-
any
plan would be charged an-impacti1feeljbased aon thednumbereof
trip ends they generated, regardless of how they might expand
in the future. He felt the $5,000 covers this parking lot
expansion and that it should be renewed with no additional
impact fee. Mr. Burgess said the $5000 is for a project the
State will do at some time. The impact fee would be for
other improvements on Shelburne Rd. not covered by the State
project. Ms. Pugh said she agreed with Mr. Craig. Mrs.
Maher felt the $5,000 should be renewed. Mr. Burgess agreed
as did Mr. Belter and Ms. Peacock.
Mr. Weith also noted that the Heindel & Noyes study is not
complete yet. The Commission agreed to let the City Engineer
deal with the study.
Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Site
Plan �p 'cil ation of Green Mountain Power Corporation for con-
struction of a 61 s ace parking Lot expansion as depicted on
a 3 a e set of lansentitled "Green Mountain Power —
Corporation Headquarters Par kkin- Lot Exp—n,if prepared
Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc, and dated June 1988,
10/20/88 wh the folio stipulations: last ised it
1. No construction may begin until the hydrologic impact
study conducted Heindel & No es
and Inc, has been submitted to
aPproved � the City Engineer. —
2. Any new lighting shall be downcast luminere.
3. The applicant shall be required to continue its obligation
for an additional term not to exceed 5 e ending 1 Novem-
ber 1992, as a reed to in the "Payment Guarantee" dated
11/3 82. _ — —
Ms. Pugh seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
3. Site Plan application of Robert & Sheila Rochefont for
operation of a retail tire and service center in an existing
4800 sq• ft. building, lot 5� Muddy Brook Industrial Park,
Palmer Court
Mr. Rochefort said the building was previously occupied by
SCI Communications. They plan to use the building with just
a few changes. They will add overhead doors on the side
toward Muddy Brook Rd. Office space will be turned into a
salesroom. Mrs. Maher asked if there will be odds and ends
and parts of cars all over the lot. Mr. Rochefort said they
54.krd %ak
Delve
L) Nviz r We
✓e
- ----------- L;
---------- - -A-cT
>1 PfAve),
e 4c e j�o
Ri, ql,
cfe—A—Ily
`l L M ()t� A N. ll
I'o South Burlington Planning Commissionz
From: Joe Weith, City Planner,
Re: November 1, 1988 agenda items
Date: October 28, 1988
...........
2) GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER: RKING LOT EXPANSIONS GRILEN M(WNTAIN
DRIVE ..
At last Tuesday's meeting there was one unresolved issue „f• which
I was asked to look into. This involved whether or not the City
should require the applicant to contribute to the Shelburne Road
Intersection Improvement Fund and, if so, what amount would be
applicable.
The Cit,y's Shelburne Road impact fee is based on improvements
which are needed to accommodate the traffic generated by future
development along Shelburne Road. This fee was developod based
upon the cost of necessary improvements and the likely number of
trips to be generated by future development on the remaining
undeveloped parcels in the vicinity- of Shelburne Road.
Therefore, each new development pays a certain amount per trip
generated. Existing developments are not required to pay an
impact, fee.
The City, however, requires an existing development to pay a
traffic improvement impact fee when an addition is proposed.
This is because trip generation is generally calculated by the
square footage of a building. 'Therefore. it is relatively easy
to relate an increase in square footage (an addition) to an
increase in trip generation.
The issue confronting Green Mountain Po,;er is different.. They
have not increased their square footage of the building, but they
have obviously increased trip generations (by adding more
employees). Other businesses along Shelt rrne Road have probably
increased employees without increasing the square footage! of the
building. However., there is no way the.- the City can require
these hus.ines4es t.ci pay additional impac=_ fees. Therefore, the
first, quest ion the Planning Commission must answer is whether it
is fair, t.o assess GMP an impact fee based on an incr•c,ase in
employees �.ii.houk. and irr< r•ease in buil_din,K size when the City is
not, :assessing an impic�t, f'ef- on other businesses who Tire also
increasing staff withoutmeasuring building size.
I a I scr (lid wom(� r c,searc}� t,o soc: i f (,� has contribute ,i a fee
t,t)war•(i improve-�ments t.o the Green Mount-:n Drive/She-Iburne, Road
i111erse.c,tion. 'Ih" Planning Comnrissi.011 •equired GMI' it, post a
9
'•l��nin��.ui��nui - ('f tartni rt��
t 1 1988 �.r�,;,>rt�it► i t.(rIII S
1988
P,i g e 2
55,t)OU letter' of credit. which would be used toward improvementsto this i ntersec:,t i.ort some time in the future ( see enclosed
10/12/82 mi.nut(!S). Th(-er•efore, GMP was required to pt-y some type
Of' impact. f'ee i n 1982. 'this fee was based on G ll''s fair share
which was based on a traffic study conducted by Joe Oppen.lander.
The analysis was based upon an estimate of t;r•:ips generated by 107
employees. There are nOW appr•ox.imtitell l7U employees at GMP.
Theref•(--)re, one could say tkrat GMP should pay an additional fee
for• the trips generated by the additional 67 employees. I would
assume the proposed parking .lot expansion is needed to
accommodate the additional employees.
I have been talking with Dick Ward to see if GMP ever posted the
letter. of Credit and whether it is still binding. We are still.
looking into t.hi.s.
If the Planning Commission were to ask me to derive a fair impact
fee based on GMP's increase in employment, I would say $794.
This is based on the 31 peak hour trips generated by the 63
additional employees since opening.
However., I am not comfortable assessing GMP an impact fee in this
situation. First, the Cit,y's impact fees are generally
calculated based upon square footage of development.. Secondly,
there is no way to assess impacts fees for businesses increasing
employment unless they happen to come in for a parking lot,
expansion. Third, this raises the question of whether the City
should reimburse businesses when there is a layoff of employees.
Fourth, the :improvements for which GMP was required to post a
S5,000 letter of credit are different from the proposed
imprr)vemc:.nts to Green Mountain Drive/Shelburne Road intersection
which are included in the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement
Fund. 1t is notclear if any other developments on Green
Mountain Drive or Bar•t.l.ett, Bay Road were required to pay their,
fair share of the improvements for which GMP was assessed. I
will look into this.
3) LOT 5,_ MtiDDY BROOK INDUS'1'R1AL PARK, 1?ALM1:R COURT
Robert: artd Shi_ela R.ochefort propose to operate a retail tire and
se:r•viee center in an exist 4,800 square foot building. T'h.is
htti Iding was former l.v t►sed by SCI Communi.cations which sold and
s t ore-d t el ephone equ i. prr►ent:. The bu i I d i rig has been vacant. for a
i �rw monI hs
i'he t. i. re and ser,•i ce, ec1rrtcer• wou.l.(A u:;ee 1 , 600 :=(Iti�i i-e 1'o(c 1. 1'o1 ti
2
PLANNING COMMISSION
The South Burlington
meeting on Tuesday, 1
Conference Room, City
1 NOVEMBER 1988
Planning Commission held a regular
November 1988, at 7:30 pm, in the
Hall, 575 Dorset Street.
Members Present
William Burgess, Acting Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher,
Catherine Peacock, Ann Pugh, William Craig, John Belter
Also Present
Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Jon
Soter, Michael Murphy, Lance Llewellyn, Dennis Blodgett,
Robert Rochefort, Jane Milner, Monica Farrington, Al
Mansfield, Constance Snyder, Rod Whittier, John Barsanes,
Buddy Coffrin, Karen Unsworth
1. Minutes of 11 October 1988
On p.1, last paragraph, the first sentence should read "near
Williston Road" instead of "on Williston Rd." In the same
paragraph, the 3rd sentence should read "meets the require-
ments," instead of "exceeds the requirements."
Ms. Peacock moved to approve the Minutes of 11 October as
amended. Ms. Pugh seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
1. Continuation of Site Plan application of Green Mountain
Power Corp. for construction of a 61 mace parking lot ex-
pansion to the headquarters facility located at 25 Green
Mountain Drive
Mr. Weith outlined the 2 remaining issues: what type of
intersection improvements GMP contributed to in 1982 and
whether an impact fee could be addressed for this expansion.
He said that in 1982 there was a payment guarantee by which
GMP promised to chip in $5,000 to improvements at Shelburne
Rd. and Green Mountain Dr. At that time, improvements to
Shelburne Rd. from Imperial Dr. south were not in the State 5
year plan. This stipulation was to be reviewed in November,
1987, but this was not done. The State is planning to
improve Shelburne Rd. at that intersection, although timing of
this project is uncertain. Mr. Weith said the state is
planning improvements at the Green Mountain Dr. intersection.
He also looked into other projects on Green Mountain Drive
that occurred after the 1982 approval, and GMP wasn't re-
quired to chip in for those. Mr. Belter asked if a new
project wouldn't have to contribute to a Shelburne Rd. impact
fee. Mr. Weith said they would, based on the number of trip
ends. Mrs. Maher said GMP has gone from 107 to 174
employees, and the Planning Commission didn't have those
figures in 1982. Mr. Soter asked whathappens with the $5,000
which has expired but which is renewable. Mr. Murphy said
PLANNING COMMISSION
1 November 1988
PAGE 2
his concern was for the future. If they have a layoff, would
they get a rebate on what they contributed. A poll of the
Commission revealed the following: Mr. Craig said any new
plan would be charged an impact fee based on the number of
trip ends they generated, regardless of how they might expand
in the future. He felt the $5,000 cover
expansion and that it should be renewed
impact fee. Mr. Burgess said the $5000
State will do at some time. The impact
other improvements on Shelburne Rd. not
project. Ms. Pugh said she agreed with
Maher felt the $5,000 should be renewed.
as did Mr. Belter and Ms. Peacock.
s this parking lot
with no additional
is for a project the
fee would be for
covered by the State
Mr. Craig. Mrs.
Mr. Burgess agreed
Mr. Weith also noted that the Heindel & Noyes study is not
complete yet. The Commission agreed to let the City Engineer
deal with the study.
Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Site
Plan application of Green Mountain Power Corporation for con-
struction of a 61 space parking lot expansion as depicted on
A 3 page set of plansentitled "Green Mountain Power
Corporation Headquarters Parking Lot Expansion," prepared
Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc, and dated June 1988, last revised
10/20/88 with the following stipulations:
1. No construction may begin until the hydrologic impact
study conducted by Heindel & Noyes Inc, has been submitted to
and approved 12y the City Engineer.
2. Any new lighting shall be downcast luminere.
3. The applicant shall be required to continue its obligation
for an additional term not to exceed 5 years, ending 1 Novem-
ber 1992, as agreed to in the "Payment Guarantee" dated
11/3/82.
Ms. Pugh seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
3. Site plan application of Robert & Sheila Rochefont for
operation of a retail tire and service center in an existing
4800 sq. ft. building, lot 5, Muddy Brook Industrial Park,
Palmer Court
Mr. Rochefort said the building was previously occupied by
SCI Communications. They plan to use the building with just
a few changes. They will add overhead doors on the side
toward Muddy Brook Rd. Office space will be turned into a
salesroom. Mrs. Maher asked if there will be odds and ends
and parts of cars all over the lot. Mr. Rochefort said they
GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION
GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE • BOX 850 • SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05402 • (802) 864-5731
September 14, 1988
Mr. Joe Weith
South Burlington City Planner
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
RE: Green Mountain Power Corporation
Parking Lot Expansion
South Burlington, VT 05402
Dear Mr. Weith:
Green Mountain Power is requesting necessary approvals to
construct an additional parking area for 61 vehicles at its Cor-
porate Headquarters Facility, 25 Green Mountain Drive, South
Burlington, Vermont. Four copies of site plans for the project are
included with this document for your use.
Pertinent information about the site and proposed project is
as follows:
1. The GMP South Burlington site contains approximately 13.2
acres with one 50,000 gross square foot office building
and one 600 square foot outside storage garage. The site
presently contains parking for 126 vehicles and an access
driveway leading to the south side of the building. The
building covers approximately 5% of the site and total
coverage (including parking, driveways, and outside
storage) is approximately 15.6%.
2. This project will add a paved parking area to the north-
west side of the site covering approximately 1,800 square
feet for a total site coverage of 18.75%. Each space will
be 9 feet by 18 feet with a 24 feet access aisle.
3. This project will increase the vehicle parking capacity
for the site to 187 vehicles. This is consistent with
the South Burlington Zoning regulation (Article 19.25)
requiring 1 space per 250 net square foot of office
building.
4. Lighting for the new parking area will be provided by
four additional "shoebox style" GE Decashield 250W HPS
lighting fixtures on 20 foot poles.
5. The proposed parking area is well screened from the
undeveloped adjacent sites by a dense wooded area on the
south and east sides.
F
Mr. Joe Weith
September 14, 1988
Page 2
6. At its closest point, the proposed parking area is 40
feet from the closest property boundary.
7. Storm water drainage from the proposed parking area will
be achieved by sheet drainage into a grassed Swale,
through a 12" culvert into an existing grass drainage
area.
As detailed above, I believe the proposed parking lot expan-
sion is fully complaint with all applicable local and state
ordiances. Consequently, your assistance in obtaining the appro-
priate approvals will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
t
C� L
Jon A. Soter, P.E.
Facilities Manager
JAS/amg
Attachments
cc: R. B. Sloan
R. Dickenson, Fitzpatrick & Llewellyn, Inc.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF:
a) Owner of Record (7reen .Mountain power Coroorati on
25 Green Pbuntain Drive, South Purlington., yPrmont
b) Applicant Jon A. Sotex, Facilities Manager
Croen Fountain 'Prxx x-x Cornoration
c) Contact Person Jon A. enter
2)
PROJECT
STREET
ADDRESS: 25 ('sreen Mountain Drive, South Burlington, �7Pxmnn#-
3)
PROPOSED
USE (s)
expansion of narking area
4) SIZE OF PROJECT: (i.e. Building Square Footage, #units, maximum
height and #floors Fl parking spaces
5)
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full
and part time) :
1,7,i
6)
LOT COVERAGE: Building
71 %;
Building, Parking, Outside
Storage: 1_9 g
8) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings: $
; Landscaping $
Other Site Improvements: (Please list with cost) $—rS,Pop
ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: October 1988
ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) existing F75/day
PEAK HOUR (s) OF OPERATION: 7:00 - ^: 00 5:00 - 6:00
PEAK DAY (s) OF OPERATION: Pbriday through Friday
IGNATURE OF APPLICANT
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
March 15, 1989
Mr. Jon Soter
GReen Mountain Power Corporation
25 Green Mountain drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Dear Soter:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have
any questions please call me.
Sincerely,
Joe Weith,
City Planner
JW/mcp
1 Encl
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South BuAington
575 DORSET S-;1EET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VF :�MONT 05403
Octor)er 28, 1988
Mr. Jon Soter
Green Mountain Power Corporation
25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Parking Lot Expansion
Dear Mr. Soter:
Enclosed is
meeting and
,sure someone
to represent
JW/mcp
Ene l s
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission
my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be
is present on Tuesday, November 1, 1988 at 7:30 P.M.
,your request.
Sincerely,
Joe Weith,
City Planner
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
Novemberl1, 1988
,Mr, Jon Soter
Green Mountain Power
25 Green :fountain Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: GMP Parking Lot Expansion
Dear hIr.. Soter :
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the November 1, 1988 Planning Commission meeting
minutes. Please call if' you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Joe =4h,
City Planner
JW/mcp
1 Encl
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
December 1, 1988
Mr. Jon Soter
Green Mountain Power
25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: GMP Parking Lot Expansion
Dear Mr. Soter:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
The City reviewed the plan titled "Corporate Headquarters,
Parking Lot Expansion", dated November 20, 1988 and finds the
three proposed stormwater infiltration basins, totaling 80700
gallons of storage, acceptable in meeting the drainage concerns
raised in the Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. hydrologic
evaluation.
As agreed upon at our meeting of November 16, 1988 Green
Mountain Power shall be responsible for reconstructing thn
existing velocity reducing structure at Bartlett Brook in a
location further away from the stream. This reconstruction shall
be conducted no later than spring, 1989.
If ,you have any questions regarding this matter, or if I oan be
of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Joe Weith,
City Planner
JW/mcp
cc: Roger Dickinson
State of Vermont
LAND USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT
CASE NO 4C0094-2D LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
APPLICANT Green Mountain Power Real 10 V.S.A., CHAPTER 151
Estate Corporation (Act 250)
25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit
Amendment #4C0094-2D, pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10
V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands
identified in Book 126, Pages 10-12, of the land records of the City
of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Green
Mountain Power Real Estate Corporation, the "Permittee" as "grantee".
This permit specifically authorizes the Permittee to expand an
existing parking lot by 61 spaces an the existing GMP facility on
Green Mountain Drive in South Burlington, Vermont.
The Permittee, and its assigns and successors in interest, are
obligated by this permit to complete, operate, and maintain the pro-
ject as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the
following conditions:
1. All the conditions of Land Use Permit #4CO094 and amendments are
in full force and effect, except as amended herein.
2. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained as set
forth in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Ap-
proved" and on file with the District Evi ronmental Commission,
and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes
shall be made in the project without the written approval of the
District Environmental Commission.
3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing juris-
diction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically
require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that
the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accor-
dance with the terms of the permit.
Page 2
Land Use Permit Amendment
#4C0094-2D
4. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal,
the Permittee confirms and agrees for himself and all assigns and
successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall
run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and wi 11 be
binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and all as-
signs and successors in interest.
5. The Permittee shall apply and maintain water and/or calcium
chloride on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project
during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully
established to control dust.
6. Prior to commencement of construction the Permittee shall file
either an amended Discharge Permit issued by the Agency of Na-
tural Resources or evidence that such an amended permit is not
required.
7. The Permittee shall comply with Exhibits #5, #7, and #8 for
erosion control. Hay bale dams and silt fences shall be in-
stalled as depicted on the plans prior to commencement of con-
struction. The Permittee shall prevent the transport of any
sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved
herein. All disturbed areas of the construction site shall be
stabilized, seeded and mulched within 1 to 14 days of initial
disturbance, and prior to October 1, to ensure proper stabiliza-
tion of disturbed soils. All erosion control devices shall be
periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetati of n
is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas.
The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site
inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose
additional conditions with respect to erosion control as they
deem necessary.
8. In addition to conformance with the requirements of condition #7,
the Permittee shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of
waste materials into any surface waters. Compliance wi th the
requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittee
from compliance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, Vermont's Water
Pollution Control Law.
9. Prior to any site work, the Permittee shall install and maintain
fencing along the existing tree line.
10. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those
approved in Exhibit #6, and shall be mounted no higher than
20 feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be in-
stalled or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources
and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area
to be illuminated.
Page 3
Land Use Permit Amendment
#4C0094-2D
11. All construction on this project must be completed by October 15,
1989.
12. This permit shall expire on October 15, 2019 unless extended by
the District Commission. Notwithstanding, this permit shall
expire one year from date of issuance if the Permi ttee have not
demonstrated an intention to proceed with the project.
Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for
permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 6090(b).
Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, thi s19ay of i��u����
1988.
By
M. Lynn Whalen, Acting Chairman
District #4 Commission
Commissioners participating in
Ca?rria Ma s-Pugh, ssi stant this decision:
trict 4 Coordinator
Helen Lawrence
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I, Carrie Mauhs-Pugh, District
Coordinator for the #4 District of the Environmental Board,
sent a copy of the foregoing AMENDMENT regarding #4C0094-2D
by U.S. Mail, postage paid, to the following:
Green Mountain Real Estate Corp.
ATTN: Jon A. Soter
25 Green Mountain Dr.
So. Burlington, Vt. 05403
Margaret Picard
Town Clerk
575 Dorset St.
So. Burlington,
Chairman, Board
c/o Town Clerk's
575 Dorset St.
So. Burlington,
Vt. 05403
of Selectman
Office
Vt. 05403
Chairman, Town Planning Commission
c/o Town Clerk's Office
575 Dorset St.
So. Burlington, Vt. 05403
Joe Weith
575 Dorset St.
So. Burlington, Vt. 05403
William Szymanski
Town Manager
575 Dorset St.
So. Burlington, Vt. 05403
Chittenden County Regional
Planning Commission
PO Box 108
Essex Junction, VT 05453
Mark Sinclair, Esq.
Representative, State Agencies
Agency of Natural Resources
103 South Main St. - 2 Center
Waterbury, VT 05676
Executive Officer
Environmental Board
State Office Building P.O.
Montpelier, VT 05602
Page 2
Certificate of Service
District #4
#4C0094-2D
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
60 Main Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
District Commissioners:
Helen Lawrence
Lynn Whalen
111 West Street
Essex Junction, VT 05452
Regional Engineer
Ernie Christiansen
111 West Street
Essex Junction, VT 05452
Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 18th day of November,
1988.
BY
(Ast.
rie Ma -Pugh
Dis rict #4
Coordinator
cs40942D/ir
EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION # 4C00094-2D
E
D R
E
A=APPLICANT
X
A E
N
T=TOWN
H
T C
T
TPC=TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
I
E E
E
RPC=REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
B
I
R
AEC=AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
I
V
E
T
E
D
D
N
B
0.
Y
NATURE OF EXHIBIT DATE ENTERED
Land Use Permit Amendment application (10/12/88)
1
10/12/88
A
2
Certificate of Service & Cost (9/20/88)
3 " Notice: Commencement of Construction requires a permit (10/12/88)
4 List of adjoining landowners
5 Act 250 Narrative
6 " " Lighting information
7 ItPlan: parking lot expansion sheet 1 of 2 •(6/88)
8 V1Plan: erosion control details sheet 2 of 2 (6/88)
FJ
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
November- 18, 1988
Mr. Jon Soter
Green Mountain Power Corporation
25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: GMP Parking lot expansion
Dear Mr. Soter:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658.7958
Enclosed are the October 25, 1988 Planning Commission meeting
minutes. Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Joe k'eith,
City Planner
JW/mcp
1 Encl
NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND HEARING
ACT 250 MINOR APPLICATION #4C0094-2D
10 V.S.A., CHAPTER 151
,i
!i Notice is hereby given that on October 18, 1988, an applica-
tion was filed by Green Mountain Power Real Estate Corporation,
�25 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, Vermont expand an
i existing parking area by 61 spaces at the existing GMP facility
on Green Mountain Drive in South Burlington, Vermont.
The District Environmental Commission will treat this appli-
cation under Environmental Board Rule 51 -- Minor Applications
(amended effective 9-1-84). A proposed permit has been prepared
i! by the Commission and is available at the Commission's office.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law wi 1 1 not be prepared
unless a public hearing is requested. The request shall state
in writing with specificity why a hearing is required and what
additional evidence will be presented.
No hearing will be convened unless, on or before November
14, 1988, a party notifies the Commission or the Commission sets
the matter for hearing on its own motion. If a timely hearing
request is received, the hearing will be convened on or before
November 21, 1988.
Parties entitled to participate are the municipality, the
municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission,
state agencies, adjoining property owners, and persons granted
party status pursuant to Board Rule 14(B).
c�
Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of October,
1988.
A
B6y %
A!�;istant
e Mauhs ugh
District Coordinator
111 West Street
Essex Junction, Vermont
05452 879-6563
State of Vermont
r
•
LAND USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT
This is a Proposed Permit, please submit your comments by November 14,
1988.
CASE NO 4C0094-2D LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
APPLICANT Green Mountain Power Real 10 V.S.A., CHAPTER 151
Estate Corporation (Act 250)
25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit
Amendment #4C0094-2D, pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10
V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands
identified in Book 126, Pages 10-12, of the land records of the City
of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Green
Mountain Power Deal Estate Corporation, the "Permittee" as "grantee".
This permit specifically authorizes the Permittee to expand an
existing parking lot by 61 spaces an the existing GMP facility on
Green Mountain Drive in South Burlington, Vermont.
The Permittee, and its assigns and successors in interest, are
obligated by this permit to complete, operate, and maintain the pro-
ject as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the
following conditions:
1. All the conditions of Land Use Permit #4CO094 and amendments are
in full force and effect, except as amended herein.
2. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained as set
forth in accordance with the plans and exhibits stamped "Ap-
proved" and on file with the District Evi ronmental Commission,
and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes
shall be made in the project without the written approval of the
District Environmental Commission.
3. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing juris-
diction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically
require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that
the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accor-
dance with the terms of the permit.
Page 2
Land Use Permit Amendment
#4C0094-2D
4. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal,
the Permittee confirms and agrees for himself and all assigns and
successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall
run wi th the 1 and and the 1 and uses herei n permi tted, and wi 11 be
binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and all as-
signs and successors in interest.
5. The Permittee shall apply and maintain water and/or calcium
chloride on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project
during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully
established to control dust.
6. Prior to commencement of construction the Permittee shall file
either an amended Discharge Permit issued by the Agency of Na-
tural Resources or evidence that such an amended permit is not
required.
7. The Permi ttee shal 1 comply wi th Exhibits #5, #7, and #8 for
erosion control. Hay bale dams and silt fences shall be in-
stalled as depicted on the plans prior to commencement of con-
struction. The Permittee shall prevent the transport of any
sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved
herein. All disturbed areas of the construction site shall be
stabilized, seeded and mulched within 1 to 14 days of initial
disturbance, and prior to October 1, to ensure proper stabiliza-
tion of disturbed soils. All erosion control devices shall be
periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until veget ati of n
is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas.
The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site
inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose
additional conditions with respect to erosion control as they
deem necessary.
8. In addition to conformance with the requirements of condition #7,
the Permittee shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of
waste materials into any surface waters. Compliance with the
requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittee
from compliance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, Vermont's Water
Pollution Control Law.
9. Prior to any site work, the Permittee shall install and maintain
fencing along the existing tree line.
10. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those
approved in Exhibit #6, and shall be mounted no higher than
20 feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be in-
stalled or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources
and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area
to be illuminated.
Page 3
Land Use Permit Amendment
#4C0094-2D
11. All construction on this project must be completed by October 15,
1989.
12. This permit shall expire on October 15, 2019 unless extended by
the District Commission. Notwithstanding, this permit shall
expire one year from date of issuance if the Permi ttee have not
demonstrated an intention to proceed with the project.
Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for
permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 6090 (b).
Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of
, 1988.
By
M. Lynn Whalen, Acting Chairman
District #4 Commission
Commissioners participating in
Carrie Mauhs-Pugh, Assistant this decision:
District #4 Coordinator
Helen Lawrence
r
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: South Burlington Planning Commission
FROM: Joe Weith, City Planner
RE: October 25, 1988 Agenda Items
DATE: October 21, 1988
3) GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER, GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE
Green Mountain Power proposes to construct a 61 space paved parking lot expansion
to the headquarters facility located on Green Mountain Drive. The headquarters
facility is situated on 2 lots totalling 13.2 acres. The building and majority
of parking sit on the front 9.4 acre parcel. A portion of the existing paved
lot and a tempory gravel parking lot sit on the back 3.8 acre parcel. The proposed
61 space parking lot expansion is located on the back 3.8 acre parcel where the
temporary gravel parking area currently exists.
The parcel is zoned commercial 2. The parcel is bounded on the South and East
by undeveloped City land, on the West by the Green Mountain Power building, and
on the North by the U.V.M. Horticultural farm and an office building.
PARKING: The 50,000 square foot facility currently has 126 parking spaces. This
project would increase the parking capacity to 187 spaces.
ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access would be from the existing parking lot by a 20-foot
wide drive. Aisle widths between parking spaces would be 24 feet as required by
zoning. Standard size (9' x 18') parking spaces are shown.
COVERAGE:,Lot coverage is 18.6 %. Maximum of 70% is allowed.
LANDSCAPING: The plan shows no new landscaping. The,lot is densly wooded on
its South and East side which forms a nice screen. The lot is also adequately
screened along its North boundary line.
LIGHTING: The plan shows 2 existing flood luminaires to be removed and 4
"shoebox" G.E. Decashield 250w HPS lighting fixtures to be installed on 20 foot
poles. I believe these lighting fixtures are of the "downcast" type.
DRAINAGE: Heindel and Noyes is currently evaluating the impact of this project
on the Bartlett Brook watershed. If their determination is not ready by next
Tuesday's meeting, I feel it would be alright to stipulate that construction
cannot begin until completion of the Heindel and Noyes study and review and
approval by the City Engineer.
OTHER: The 15 foot wide pedestrian easement running along the North property
line should be shown on the plan.
See Bill Szymanski's comments.
11/1/88
JW
MOTION OF APPROVAL
i move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site
Plan application of Green Mountain Power Corporation for
construction of a 61 space parking lot expansion as depicted on a
3 page set of plans entitled "Green Mountain Power Corporation
Headquarters Parking Lot Expansion," prepared by Fitzpatrick -
Llewellyn Inc., and dated June 1988, last revised 10/20/88, with
the following stipulations:
1. No construction may begin until the hydrologic impact study
conducted by ROVver, Heindel, and Noyes Inc., has been submitted
to and approved by the City Engineer.
2. Any new lighting shall be downcast lumi.naire.
3. The applicant shall contribute $794 t the S lburne Road
n r ecti Improve n Fund. h s fee 's ased o th peak
h ur tr' s g nera d b the 3 a dit' nal em oy a sin e
original site pl appro al 'n 198 .
Followin further scussion g the licant, the City,
nd the Ag no of T ns ortatio con erni prow nts the
1 urn Ro d a Gr en Mo ntai D ve int s ct' n, the
Planr in Com ►iss' n may re ire th pplic to 'c. ntinu -s
obligation as reed to he "Payment Guarantee" dated 11/3/82.
Tlic- :south burlington Manning Commission hela a reL;ular ^neetinfr on Tuesday,
October 12, 1982 at 7:30 pm in the Conference !-:oom, City :call, 575 Dorset St.
Members Present
Sidney Poger, Chairman; John Belter, Kirk ''vrool.ery, George !:ona, Mary -Barbara
Maher
Members Absent
Peter Jacob, Robert Walsh
Others Present
David Spitz, Planner; Judy Hurd, The Other Paper; J.R. Zimmerman, Joseph
Stevens, Norman Myers, Judy & Jerry Huetz, Duncan Case, William Shearer,
Louise & Bruce Mozdehi, Frank & Mary Anne Murray, Edmund Smith, Norma Unsworth,
Lee Liggett, Robert Perry, Fred Demer
Minutes of September 28, 1982
The September 28, 1982 minutes were approved on a motion by Mr. Woolery,
a second by Mr. Belter, and a unanimous vote. ------ —
Discussion of street improvements related to Green Mountain Power development`
Mr. Poger noted that copies of the August 3, 1982 minutes had been sent
to the members to remind them of what had been decided on this issue at that
meeting.
Mr. Mona arrived at this time.
Mr. Spitz said that he had been looking at cost estimates for improvement
of the intersection. City traffic consultant Dr. Oppenlander designed one
improvement and the State highway department designed another, which Dr.
Oppenlander feels is excessive. Dr. Oppenlander's design would probably cost
$20,000, while the State's would be closer to $95-100,000. Mr. Spitz said
GKP would add a fairly small amount of traffic to that intersection. He
said there were no other major developments expected in that area, and added
that neither the State nor the city has any plans or any money for improvements
to the intersection. He noted that GMP could contribute some money now, but
it probably would not be used for several years. He mentioned an amount of
510,000.
Mr. Perry, representing GMP, said the problem was riot with the number of
cars, but was with the three-phase signal and the lack cf another turning lane.
He noted that the cost of reworking the signal was very low. He added that
as far as Green Mountain Power's contribution to traffic, using 1988 figures,
at the a.m. peak they would provide 30p of the turning movements and in the
evening it would be 26%. The rest of the day it is negligible. Using the worst
case for GMP, for those two peak hours of the day, in 1988, they would add less
than 3o to the total traffic. He said GMP was willing to rake a contribution,
such as $5,000, which he felt was their share of the worst case traffic, but he
felt the time of the contribution should be limited and he sugfested that it be
handled via a letter of credit.
Mr. Poger noted that this case was different from previous cases because
this is a State road and because no improvements were sch�-�duled within a certain
time here. '�Ir. `,t'oolery felt a letter of credit would be all rif_;ht, :..rice it was
2.
PLANNING COMMISSION OCTvBEI' 12, 1982
unlikely that the building would chanrr,e hands. r. Spitz, noted that, a letter
1
of credit did not keep pace with inflation. He was asked how he had arrived
at the suggested figure of Z10,000 and said that he had looked at other
examples recently and how much they had paid per peak hour car. Using the
same ratio would have come to a figure of $5,000 to .S6,000, but this case is
geared toward one intersection only.
Mr. Poger was uneasy about requesting a contribution toward intersection
n
improvements which might not be made for 5-15 years, during which time GI,:P
b
would be adding to traffic at the intersection. He felt that in this case,
perhaps the money should be given back after 5 years, or none should be
requested at all. Mr. Mona did not agree. Mr. Woolery noted that money had
been requested for traffic improvements from every major development recently
and he felt that procedure should be followed here, for consistency.
Mr. Belter suggested adding an interest rate to the letter of credit.
Mr. Mona moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission accent
a $5,000 assessment from Green Mountain Power -Corporation for road improvements
in the Shelburne Road -Green Mountain Drive intersection area. This assessment
to be received in a letter of credit which will grow at the rate ofper
year. There shall be an automatic Planning Commission review after 5 years.
�0
Mr. Woolery seconded the motion.
Mr. Poger was uneasy with this because the city has no power to improve
that State road, nor do they have specific improvements in mind for it. He
stated that while he would not vote against it, he could neither vote for it.
The motion carried with 4 in favor and Mr. Poger abstaining.
kN-
Sketch plan review of application by Homestead Design, Inc., for a 6 lot
subdivision on Bartlett's Bay Road
f�
Mr. Mona stated that he had been delayed tonight by the police department,��
which had told him that Mr. Robert Marcellino had called and told them that he
would not be able to come in tonight. Mr. Spitz said the sketch plan would be
rescheduled.
Site plan review of application by Village Green Apartments for 30 carports
to serve existing residential units
Mr. Spitz said the units and drives existed and that no change in land-
scaping was proposed. The application was granted two variances from the
Zoning Board. One was a side yard variance, so that they could take down as
few trees as possible, and the other was a setback from the stream in the
area. There will be one carport plus some storage per unit, as well as some
open spaces. There will be no fewer parking spaces than before. The Fire
Chief has seen the plan and does not object. Mr. Spitz said there was a
pedestrian trail shown in the Comprehensive Plan in this area. Mrs. Unsworth,
speaking for the development, said she did not object to such a trail and Mr.
Mona said it should be noted on the plan of record.
Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the
site plan application by Village Green Apartments for 30 carports at 75 Hinesburk
ments," prepa
stipulations:
1. An offer of dedication for a 15 foot wide pedestrian trail easement
along the north side of the drainageway shall be submitted prior to issuance
of a buildini: permit. The easement shall also be marked on the site plan and
11/1/88
iW
MOTION OF APPROVAL
I move, the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site
Plan application of Green Mountain Power Corporation for
consfrucItion of a 61 space parking lot expansion as depicted on a
3 page set of plans entitled "Green Mountain Power Corporation
Headquarters Parking Lot Expansion," prepared by Fitzpatrick -
Llewellyn Inc., and dated June 1988, last revised 10/20/88, with
the following stipulations:
1. No construction may begin until the hydrologic impact study
conducted by w=-r. Heindel, and Noyes Inc., has been submitted
to and approved by the City Engineer.
2. Any new lighting shall be downcast luminaire.
The app cant shall ontribute 7 4 to the a burne
I tersecti0 mprovemen F nd. T s f is bas on the 3 peak
h ur trip enerated y he 63 addi Tonal a ploye s s' ce t e
o iginal it plan a prow 1 in 982.
4. Fol owLoa
ur er iscus ion a ong t appl'cant the ty,
an th Ageo Tran port tion oncern ng im rove ents t the
Sh lbu ne and G een Mount in D ive i ter ection the
P1 nn' g Co ion ma r quire he plican to 'continu its
obl'g tiion greed to in the "Pa men Guarant dated 11 /82.
G��
011Ify
,=M P AC, `T Ff�_ e C/S LG S
63 Hof r�u^"I P--x to to te-2S
— T i C,�dC
7 1 (,vrrJrcA,
— Ae - 'T,
r �� � /o y, t 4,
CT�� Y Iosn"ec
City Planner or the Cit,v of South Burlington, Vermont,
population 12,0 +. Responsible for the maintenance and
updating of Compreh sive Plan and development by-laws, as well
as review of developm t plans and administration of subdivision
regulations and site pla review; I�bvelopsand implements special
programs such as TDR, den 'ty bonuses and traffic evaluation
system. Serves as staff pport for Planning Commission
reporting to City Manager. Go oral and written communication
skills required. A master degree in planning or related field
and at least three years exper' nce are prerequisites.
Additional experience may be substit ed in lieu of advanced
planning degree;, ,,Starting salary $23,9 - $25,794. After 6
months $25,449 $27,357. Send resume b pril a'1988 to
William J. Szymanski, City Manager, 575 Dors t St eet, South
Burlington, Vermont.
a-
1
c
VC>
10/25/88
J 1v
MOTION OF APPROVAL
I move the South Burlingotn Planning Commission approve the Site
Plan application of Green Mountain Power Corporation f'or
construction of a 61 space parking lot expansion as depicted on a
3 page set of plans entitled "Green Mountain Power Corporation,
Corporate Headquarters Parking Lot Expansion," prepared by
Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc., and dated June 1988, last revised
10/20/88, with the following stipulations:
1. No construction may begin until. the hydrologic, impact study
conducted by Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc., has been submitted
to and approved by the City Engineer.
City of South Blit•lington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGI ON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
October 21, 1988
Mr. Jon Soter
Green Mountain Power Corporation
25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Parking Lot Expansion
Dear Mr. Soter
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission
meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also
enclosed are Bill Szymanski's comments,
Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 25, 1988
at 7:30 PM to represent your request.
Sincerely,
Joe Weith
City Planner
JW/b
Encls
o-
r
M E M O R A 11 D U M
TO: South Burlington Planning Commission
FROM: William J. Szymanski, City Manager/Engineer
RE: Agenda - October 25, 1988
DATE: October 21, 1988
3) Green Mountain Power
Mountain View Blvd.
(1) Most of the area is now used as a temporary parking area. The area to
the north is a lawn area, well maintained, with a gradual Swale. It's
a shame to disturb it and construct a three (3) foot deep ditch. The lot
can be graded so that it drains gradually to the north and south without
the lawn area distrubed.
4) Nowland Estate
Spear Street
(1) Lots 2 & 3 should access from the future street, at least 100 feet from
the intersection.
(2) This subdivision will be served by the City sewer system. The design
of the sewer collection system will be submitted to the City for review
and approval prior to issuance of any building permits.
5) Summer Woods
Patchen Woods
(1) A 50 foot R.O.W. for a public street is not wide enough. It should be
our standard of 60 feet. The sidewalk should be placed along the side
which has all the driveways. The sidewalk must be constructed at a
uniform grade at an elevation of at least 7 inches above the edge of the
road. That means that at each driveway, the driveway has to pitch about
7 inches in 5 feet, that is to steep a grade. Dips in the sidewalk at
each driveway are not acceptable. It makes it very difficult to walk on,
especially during the winter months, and for older people like Chairman
Pete, Mrs. Maher, and myself.
(2) The public street maintained by the City will include 2.0 units. The
private street, almost as long, will include 18 units. This division will
result in two associations, one with much more maintenance cost than the
other especially for snow removal and street repaving. This is due only
because of sub -standard street construction and will result in future
problems for the City and the residents.
(3) Off street parking is a concern. Counting an enclosed garage as a parking
space is a mistake. Garages, especially in the summer, are used for every-
thing, except parking cars. Also arrangements where one parked car has to
be moved before another can get out is not good, as we all know.
H
1\1NWagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. consulting geologists
P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820
October 14, 1988
Mr. Roger J. Dickenson, P.E.
Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn
1 Wentworth Drive
Williston, VT 05495
Re: Green Mountain Power Expansion
Dear Roger:
I have examined the site plans for the Green Mountain Power
site. Per the South Burlington Planning Commission, our review
of the hydrologic impact of the proposed expansion will be
conducted along with the review of the impact of existing
construction on -site. This review will be made by using the
subwatersheds that you have identified on -site, and performing
simulations using the TR-20 hydrologic model along with data
files which represent the entire Bartlett Brook/North Brook
watershed. This site presents some difficulty since it lies on
the drainage divide between the north fork of Bartlett Brook and
North Brook. Therefore, simulations will be made for each of
these watersheds under pre- and post -development conditions. We
will evaluate the hydrologic impact between pre -development
conditions, and post -development (existing plus expansion) for
25-year 24-hour storm. The goal of the simulation is to insure
that with the existing and proposed coverage, that the
stormwater management system results in no increase in peak
discharge to the receiving waters for the design storm.
Our fees to perform this evaluation will be $1,050. Upon
receipt of check in this amount, we will begin work, with
completion of the evaluation within two to three weeks.
Please contact me with any questions.
Sincerely,
Yf e eA. elson, Geologist
Wag er, Hei del, and Noyes, Inc.
JAN/tj r
cc: Joseph Weith
GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION
GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE • BOX 850 • SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05402 • (802) 864-5731
September 20, 1988
Mr. Joseph Weith
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05401
Dear Mr. Weith:
you will find enclosed a check in the amount of $15.00 for
the site plan application for the addition to Green Mountain
Power's parking lot.
Very truly yours,
d-,z) -A 0:t-/au-p-
Jon A. Soter, P.E.
Facilities Manager
JAS/amg
Enclosure
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
One Wentworth Drive
WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495
(802) 878-3000
TO VVG
Ct i x vF (� i '0 L1.'�Jc� i UN
WE ARE SENDING YOU V<Attached ❑ Under separate cover via_
❑ Shop drawings , ( Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
XFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
L>�,As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
LIEUTEM W
DATE _
/D-
JOB NO.
USw
ATTENTION
RE:
L0 i
the following items:
❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
OPY TO Uyl\) ✓Q, n
SIGNED:
4
,40-2 Ares I.., G d.0 , Mass. 0I4/1 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at on
INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
One Wentworth Drive 0 Williston * Vermont w 05495 w (802)878-3000
November 20, 1988
Mr. Joseph Weith, City Planner
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
RE: Green Mountain Power Parking Lot Expansion
Green Mountain Drive
FILE: 88080
Dear Mr. Weith:
As requested, enclosed please find one set of revised plans for the
above referenced project.
Three stormwater infiltration basins have been added to this project,
providing 8,700 gallons of storage. That volume approximates what
was agreed upon at our meeting of November 16th.
Should you have any questions' or if we may be of additional
assistance, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
' -
`D. Dickinson, P.E.
cc. Jon Soter
Design 9 Inspection 0 Studies 0 Permitting 0 Surveying
FITZPATRICK LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED JOe�'�r
Engineering & Planning Services
The Kiln - 15 Brickyard Road SHEET NO. OF
—
The JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 CALCULATED BY 1ZQ0 DATE 10-IQ" g
(802) 878-3000
CHECKED BY� j-DATE_
SCALE w-j C0VS)gA GC, Q9LC-L4 L%T) 0Ns
'• i
ii
............'.............:.............b.............;..............:............:..............!............_:..............,.....................................................,....................................................
t j
i ! i
P ; r....
i i
...... ..... ...... ..... ......
..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ......
... ....
?
............•.......................................................i..............1..............,.............,.............d.............>....................
..............�. v
`• II
....;........j..........«.............'..............i........................................«........
j ......
! !
... ........ ....
...... ...... .........i....
.............:...........................................! A.............<..............;.........................................`..............,..........
I 1
.........q.............b.........
i f.... .......
.........
..... ...... .... ....._
...3.... . 'jt
...................<..............;..............;..............,.............;......................................................;..........
�( ` ,'TJ 6
...... ...... ......
l Ct ZZgA'
...... ...... ..... ...... ...... ......
E ..........:............. : ....
.....
_ is
i
.................................o.............9.............? .....;..:
.._i........ ..
j ..........
.. ......
.........'...........:Tc
?
AREA_..........._;............:... ...._.......:..............
.......... c?'.............. .............. .............
.............i 3,. �3.... c .......
• 3r _ ,.,
-/
..................................
....... ......
........................._;......................._.....
. ......ut�...........,
C. 4............,.
i
... ..
i
.........._ ..........'........ .......
.. ..... ..... .....
Q
Y !
..... ..... ......
....? ..
....................................i............ . PANG
:
..................... ............_......,............................._..........,............................,...........................,.............,............b....
C-U.1/G�/� G G�
:
? ! ....i... ........
..... .._,. �fo .... ..... ........
1
......i
j 0�4
?
.... ............_.............4.............
i ?
......... .............:............ �1Q020_6
i
C VISA-6 E
i ....
: ............................... y......
?
'.............:... '............. phi ..._
��•:'� �cl
1�i�vea rangyQ......T....�.......�'
.. .... .... ..... ...
.... ...... ..._1... ..b.... .... .............. ....
i i'.
..........?.................:..........,.........,.............. /v,........,...__
:
7�w '
c
i
.. ....... ......
LUG
cv��c,c.._s;
;...
..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .....
`.l °% ........._
.... ..y, .....
.......................................•.........................................................................................................................
j
?
? !
... ...... ...... .....
! ! !
........... d............ _ ........................... r............. ;........... ..;.............. :........... ...:......... ...............................
i
! i
. i
........................... !.............,.............. .............q.............p.............1.. .... ? i
t
t t !
;: ! j
' .....'............:.............i..............'.............i............................,.............b.............e.............i........................._:..............j..............j............_j..............
! ?
i
? ; i
i i ? i?...........!
...................I....... i
j
? �
:
!
j ! ?
! S
i i
i.......
i
i... ..... ...... ..... .....
...... ...... ... .....
..... .....
..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...................
i
..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .....
..............i.............i............_j
,
i
! i ? i i
.._:.... ....i....
............n..............i.............` d............. ............. '............. .......... ...... ......
:. ? ! :
............................:............................................s............. ............,....................................... i.............t...................
i
.... '............_!............. i...........................i.........
.............. ........... .....
i
j
:...................'..............'............_i..........
...... ...... ..... .....
...e....
i
i....
?
...... ...... ...... ...... ......
..... ...... ...... ..... ....... ...... .....
...... ..... ...... ...... .....
..... ...... ...... ..... ....... .....
...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ......
..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ......
i
..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .....
...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ...... ... ...... .....
........._.........................'............. i.............
i ...! ........... ..... ..... ......
.............:......._....,...............:.............a....... ...a............ ? .. .j..... ........ .....'{....
:
i....... ?
i
... i.... ...... ...... ..... ......
....1....
..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ....... ...... .....
...... ...... ...... .....
..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .....
i;
..........._;......_......:.............. :.............. ........ ......n.._.....................,.,......,.......;.....................
.............i..............i..............:..........._i..........._............_;............. .................. .....
5.... .........
i
........j........... ,..{........................... i............. y... ..
.... «.... ..... ...... ...... ...... ......
..... .. ._.. ...... ..... ...... ...... ......
...... ...... ..... ..... ,..... .................
..... ...... ..... ...... ......................... ..........j.............
...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ....... ...........
1
H
Wagner, H_eindel, and Noyes, Inc. consulting geologists
W N P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820
November 14, 1988
Mr. Joseph Weith
Planning Office
Municipal Building
Dorset Street
S. Burlington, VT 05401
Dear Mr. Weith:
Enclosed please find the results of our hydrologic evaluation
for the Green Mountain Power site on Green Mountain Drive.
Based on an analysis, we have specified a stormwater management
plan which will result in no increase to peak discharge for
25-year 24-hour storm above those projected for current
conditions. Given the satisfactory performance of the existing
detention units on -site following five years of operation, and
the sandy soil conditions, we believe that this will also meet
the objective of no increase to peak discharge of receiving
water above predevelopment levels.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
'Off�reynA. Nelson, Geologist
Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc.
JAN/tj r
Enclosure
cc: Roger Dickenson
Jon A. Soter, G.M.P.
BARTLETT BROORIGREEN MOUNTAIN POWER
HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION
SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. This evaluation has considered the hydrologic impact of
stormwater runoff from the Green Mountain Power site. The
site location is such that runoff occurs to both Bartlett
Brook and to North Brook. The evaluation has been performed
for predevelopment condition, existing condition, and for
the proposed parking lot expansion.
2. Currently, stormwater leaving the portion of the site which
is in the Bartlett Brook watershed is retained and treated
by six buried, open -bottomed dispersal units, which have a
total volume of 16,000 gallons. An inspection of these
reveals that significant infiltration of stormwater does
occur at the current time, about 5 years following
installation. In fact, the inspection showed no evidence of
any runoff from the devices in the recent past. However,
during the 25-year 24-hour storm, we project a peak
discharge to Bartlett Brook of 3.15 cfs under current
development conditions, an increase from the projected peak
of 0.51 cfs under predevelopment conditions. However, at
the confluence with Bartlett Brook, an increase of only
0.6 cfs is projected above predevelopment, from 146.14 to
146.77 cfs. The magnitude of this increase (0.4%) is lower
than the sensitivity of the model. This combined with the
inability of the model to take into account any
infiltration, leads us to conclude that in the Bartlett
Brook watershed that Green Mountain Power is meeting the
planning commission mandate of no increase to peak discharge
above predevelopment levels. No additional increase is
projected as a result of the proposed parking lot expansion,
since all drainage from this improvement will be to the
North Brook watershed.
3. For North Brook, an increase in peak discharge from the site
from 1.16 cfs to 1.84 cfs is projected between
predevelopment and existing conditions. An additional
increase to 2.61 cfs is projected following the parking lot
expansion. At the confluence with the Green Mountain Drive
stormwater collection system, an increase from 35.6 cfs to
36.3 cfs is projected.
4. To minimize the impact of the existing and increased
stormwater discharge to North Brook and Bartlett Brook, we
have made the following recommendations.
5. The curbing planned along the western edge of the new
parking area should be removed to allow for sheet flow onto
the grassed area to the west, and thus removal of
particulate material as well as oils and greases from the
stormwater.
1
6. A series of six detention units of designs similar to those
used adjacent to the existing parking areas should be
installed to the west and north of the new parking area.
Based on a total volume of 16,000 gallons, the resulting
peak discharge to the North Brook watershed is projected to
be 1.87 cfs from the site.
7. As an alternative to this, the installation of the detention
units beneath the parking lot, along with regrading of the
parking lot to insure flow into these devices would be
acceptable. We understand that the applicant is proposing
to construct these devices without outlets, but to grade the
parking lot such that when these are full that runoff will
flow onto the grassed areas to the west. This is acceptable
provided that the parking area is graded to result in flow
onto the grassed areas only when the detention units are
full. Further, several breaks should be provided in the
curbing along the western side of the parking lot to
distribute runoff along the length of the grassed area.
8. The existing velocity reducing structure at Bartlett Brook
should be reconstructed further away from the stream. The
current location of this structure is in the center of the
streambed, resulting in the diversion of streamflow around
it, and thus the potential for increased velocity and
erosion of the streambanks.
9. With the implementation of the recommendations specified
above, peak discharge rates from the site for the 25-year
24-hour storm will not be increased above current levels as
projected by the TR-20 model. We also believe that peak
discharge rates at the receiving streams will in fact be
reduced to predevelopment levels, given the sensitivty
limitations of the model and the occurrence of infiltration
within the detention units which is not taken into account
by the model. An inspection of these units following five
years of operation indicates that they appear to be
functioning extremely well. Therefore, it is likely that
peak discharge rates for the existing condition are
overpredicted by the model. We believe the same will be
true of the area draining to the North Brook watershed,
which will be serviced by the new detention units.
Therefore we believe the planning commission's goals are
being met with the existing and proposed stormwater
management program.
2
ATTACHMENTS
H
rIV71 N
Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc,
Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermoni
o U V,;,r 1.1 ay r<_.(;. ti., !c A F x�
O
Page No.
PAGE OF
PROJECT: 6EVCil-i-i—' L
DATE I I • 1 ' i�-
►`"-, , , -,IT k- ( 0
IP do C,
%t r
tom, rt..�� _�--
�-�.•
�-�-. ,-
�8, 3
11- AIL1 L- .VLk li Q_IJ V LL-
�'T� (G�)
I`t (� I`t
1 wrtk
j) "> T"
U/1,Licti/
1,li -IF C
3v.
H
UV�N
Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc.
Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont
0
P
PAGE OF age No.
PROJECT:,M/1T/f;'/'
Dk,' ^W 1X iN:ri,'1v f �rLt3I�
DATE: Aje)V) e9 / 998
P17fNT/01V
B077,0q OF TiIHF
HIGH£s7" 1n1V
,UfP`T!/ of
UNl7
EIfU197 0,V rp)
FGFuF)rl4hi firO
Dv- /
aC21�7,aa
1?i 0. 57v
`t a
90_
�06.a,
� i0.��,o
a
avt. IL/.�
aio.o
3.57
t`(1-`l
0
7,77
'20 el
`01/,6e/
SUB.f//
77
1� c c 00 FAITIO V 6M117-r ; rf) vC n/,q/L-/( Tale = /0 '
ilOL UM£S OF- , �'7- FNT / Onl UN i Tie'
DU - /
326
71�f 3
'�?S"/ Y ya /
.D0-c;Z
3/4-1
-F1''
�231/9
9aI
,D(/--::
?'�o
"
';209'/
gal
DU-Y
al a
I^f
1631
gaI
Dv-_1
_?a
yvr,
-�I
,D(J-6
;�9
2a I `/
.9z' l
Voc ut-tc or c./NE5
(FN6Ty D/0r-!£T£'k I�OL(rME
3 7 0 966 -fi -' 64✓.�' Via/
I/OL 0"C = 16 Li 6t/ J �- //or7S
H
INVN
Wagner , Heindel , and Noyes, Inc,
Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermoni
U,U U`i Z
C-
NO
Page No.
PAGE OF
PROJECT: "- LI-X < <, L A''
DATE l\' .t .
H
WVN
Wagner, Heindel , and Noyes, Inc,
Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermoni
N, Vk-
V 'S k'j j%'j
S AJ A-r
T
to
PAGE - - Page No.
OF
PROJECT: 6 /(-, N t ('
DATE: I �' 2 -og
C -4 NL, t4 r1J V JA IV
C-
0,
tj
-4LI. C).
-,-11, �'
H
WVN
Wagner, Heindel and Noyes, Inc.
Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermonl
W
PAGE - Page No.
OF
PROJECT: ?-A
DATE: I l ''J
vu
9" U " U
U IVA
V,
VV)
To
J e, T. /\j t
tL Q, rt u o LA—,
tk :i IL L)
OES I (A 0ATI IV
+
(Q
Q
(.o,
C),
C)p 0
(D a I -I
0, 0 C'
AJ C L UI)
Ai L /Q 0, Lt- 1WI Pv
I
(U
JJ
I
August 11, 1982
Joseph Landry
Vermont Agency of Transportation
Montpelier, Vermont 05602
Dear Mr. Landry,
The South Burlington Planning Commission has approved Green
Mountain Power's proposed corporate headquarters with the condition
that Rhe Route 7/Green Mountain Drive intersection be evaluated
and that Green Mountain Power participz.t( in required improvements. No buildinpayment for any
g permit may be issued until -.is
matter is resolved.
We have read the Trans/Op report and feels that its conclusions
seem to have merit. We would like Your evaluation of the proposed
improvements and would be happy to=join You and/or the applicant
in any discussion of this intersection.
DHS/mcg
Sincerely,
David H. Spitz,
City Planner
mil
T P9n
P"PTI 97TT PPQOV
.)1--ATP7S7"
RFU
11-07-89 F�P�EEN MT-N.
pOWFR
JOR �
S|]�n4RY
RFU
Oq/02/83
CAL{BRATEO BASET)
ON
MAY �7-38�
1985
RAINSTORM
|
AGE 31U
FUnMAPY TARiE
1 - SELECTE0
RFSULTS
OF
STANnAPD
AND EXECUTTUE
CONTROL
lNSTRUCT[ONS
IN THE
ORDER PFRFO MED
(A
STAR(*) AFTFR
THE
PEAK OlSCHAPI;E
TIME AND
RATE
(CFS) VALUES
INDICATES A FLAT TOP
H�OROGRAPH
A
O|-|ESTTON MARK(?)
lrJD[CArES
A HYORO(�RPPH
W(TH PEAK
LAST POINT,)
i
SECTiON/
STANDARD
RA[N
AMTEC
MA[N
PREC{P[TAT
lOM
|
PEAK
DlSCHARGE
STR|]CTURF
CONTROL
DRAINAGE
TABLE
MOlST
T{ME
-------------------------
RUNCIFF
--------- 4----------------------------
TO
OPERATION
AREA
4
COND
lWCPEM
BE131N
AMOUNT
OUR ATlO!l
AMOUNT
ELEUATlBN /
(
TIME
PATE
POTE
'SO MI)
(HP)
(HR)
(TN)
(HR)
((N`
(Fr)
�
�
(-,R)
CIS, M)
�
SrgUCTU�E
1
RUNOFF
,��7
2
2
.10
.O
4.U0
34.00
1'8l
,AA- |
12.24
3�3'97
871'�
STRUCTURE
1
PES) (JOP
.2r57
2
2
.10
.0
4,00
24.130
1.81
229.34
13.152
31'47
122'4
Y9ECT{ON
1
REACH
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1'81
210.9
13.60
* 3I.47 *
122'4
YSECTTON
2
RUNOFF
`00-.3
2
2
.1O
.0
4.00
24'01)
,98
.-94- �
l2.24
�6.52
440.0
>(SECT[ON
�
ADOH�O
340
2
2
.10
'0
4'OO
24,O0
l.61
26.26
0
12.25
67.39
1qa'2
>'9ECT[ON
5
REACH
.340
2
2
.10
,0
4.00
24,OO
1'61
1'46.74
12.37
1,92.6
STRUCTURE
2
RUNOFF
.175
2
2
.10
.O
4.00
24.00
.82
,AA- `
12.32
�3-'l1
303'5
!�;TRUCTUPE
2
RESUOP
.175
2
2
.10
.0
4.011
24'00
.82
9215,84
12.32
5 6.20
321.1
>/;ECTlON
�
REACH
.175
2
2
,10
.0
4.00
2�'U0
.B�
191.B� ,|
13'42
F6'l0
320.6
FFRUCTURE
3
AOOHYD
'13113
2
2
.1O
.0
4,00
24.UV
1.33
.AA- |
12'41
120.93-
234,8
FTPUCTURE
7
�ESkOP
.51�
2
2
.10
.0
4/'00
24,00
1'33
!
!
'AA-
12'41
120'93
2 34'8
><SECT[ON
6
REACH..515
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.34
193.24
12'51
120.93
2 14.8
%SFCTION
7
REACH
.5lq.
2
2
.10
.O
4O0
24'00
1.3 3
147.96
12.61
120.04
2 3 3.1
XSECTlON
7
RUNOFF
.10�
2
2
'10
'0
4,00
24.00
1.40
'AA- ,
12.11�
84.o1
S08.6
XSECT[ON
7
AODHYO
.620
2
2
.10
.0
4'00
24.O0
1.34
149,11 /
12.59
145.91
�3 15,,3
STRm-TUFE
17
RUNOFF
.005
2
2
'10
.0
4.00
24'00
.30
'AA-
I 10
5 L
920 9
��ECTlON
7
ADOHYD
.625
2
2
.1O
'0
4.00
2�'00
1.34
148'11
9TRUCTURE
4
RESU8R
.fl,25
2
2
'10
'0
4'00
2u.00
1'34
150.19
12.67
13,8.27
22I.1
X':-;ECT{ON
R
REACH
.625
2
2
.11-1
-O
4.00
24.00
1.3id
1.33.21
12.77
138.27
221.1
�SECT lOM
S
RUNOFF
,006
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.81L.
.AA-
11.96
11.49
1915'F
'
YSECT{ON
8
ADDHYD
.631
2
2
.10
.0
4.013
24'00
1.34
(
133.22
12,77
139.20
22O.4
KSECTlON
9
RUNOFF
,259
2
2
.10
,0
4.00
�4.00
1.74
.AA- !
12.44
162.24
6,26'4
XSECT{ON
20
RUNOFF
.004
2
2
.10
.3
4.00
24'00
1.31
.419- /
11.97
15 9
1323.6 -'
XSECTYON
20
AODHYD
,2 0S 3
2
2
.lO
'g
4.00
24.00
1.73
214,2 3 /
12,44
162.89
618.7
XSECT[ON
10
RUNOFF
.050
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24,00
1.27
.A49- !
12,25
29.72
594.4
_
K9ECTTOH
11
ADDHY0
.313
2
2
-10
.O
4,00
24'00
1.66
202,722 |
12.41
186.37
594.9
KSFCTlOn
12
REACH
.3513
2
2
.10
.9
4.00
24^00
1.66
146.88
12'51-1
186.37
594-9
STRUCTURE
-7
RUNOFF
,009
2
2
.10
.0
4'U0
24.00
1'99
,AP-- /
11.97
16.88
1917.9
STRUCTURE
17,
RUNOFF
.003
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2,30
.AA-
11-96
7.21
2337,4
STRUCTURE
13
RESVOR
O0�
2
2
.10
,0
4'0O
24.OU
2^�8
l9�,4� i
12.00
5.49
1772.2 `
.
><SECT[ON
18
ADDHvD
.012
2
2
.10
.O
4.00
24.00
2'08
207.61
11.97
22,31
1871-17.0
XSECT{ON
19
REACH
.012
2
3
,lU
.0
4,00
24,00
2.11
207,61
12,07
22.31
1874.9 ~`
=
^
/
��
q
TR20 %E0
PEU 115/02/83
BARTLETT BROOK (1984+COND.)LATEST REU I1-O7-88 GREE-N MTN, POWER
COLlBRATED BASED ON M10Y 27-28' 1985 PAlNSTORM
JUB l SUMMARY
PAGE 31
5|]MMAPY TA81-E
1 - SELECTEU RESULTS
OF
STANDARQ
AND EXECUTIUE
CONTR|]L
[NSTRUCTlONS
i
IN THE ORDER PERFOP'IED
(A
STAR(*) AFTER
THE
PERK O[SCHAR',-�E
Tl�E AND
RATE (CFS)
VALUES
INDICATES
A FLAT T�p
HYOPOGRHPH
0
[JUFSTlON
MARK(?)
IN0[CATES A HYDROGRHPH
WITH PEAK
AS LA':Z-jT POINT.
�
SECT{ON/
STANDARD
RAlN
ANTEC
MAlN
PgEC[plTAT[ON
PEA� D{SCHARGE
STRUCTURE
CONTROL
DRAINAl.';E
T�BLE
M0lST
TIME
-------------------------
PUNOFF
--------------------------------------
ID
0PERArlON
AREA
#
COND
lNCREM
BEG TN
AMOUNT
DURATION
AMOUmT
EL17-UATlON: �
TlME
RATE
RHTE
(SQ M{
(HP)
(HR)
(IN)
(HP)
(IN)
(FT)
(HP)
WFS)
(CSM)
STRUCTURE
8
RUnOFF
.UU3
2
2
,IU
.0
4.00
24.00
2.53
'�4_ /
11.9
6.46
2514.8
}�SECT[ON
12
ADOHYO
,014
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24,0O
2.18
I45.94
12.03
2�-.21
1742'3
STRUCTURE
9
PLNOFP
.013
2
2
.10
.0
4.O0
24.00
2.62
,4�A-
11.96
34.4g
2573.2
gTRUCTUPE
9
RE9UOR
.013
2
2
,10
.O
4'VO
24'00
2.72
157'89
11.9
32.46
2422.0
�SE[T[ON
12
ADDHYD
.327
2
2
.10
.0
4.01)
24.00
1.-10
146.90 1
12,131
4.9
X�ECTlON
12
A0DHVD
.341
2
2
'10
,O
4'00
24.UO
l,72
1�6,92 �
12.90
194.��
�69.7
YSECT[ON
l
RUNOFF
.001
2
2
,10
.0
4.00
24,00
1'78
,AA- |
11,9
2,63
1877.8
�SECTlOM
12
HDDHYD
.343
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1'72
146,92
12'50
194.64
568'2
XSFCTTON
12
RUNOFF
, 002
�
2
, 1U
, 0
.
4 0O
2�.OU
1.6U
.AA-
11'9�
3'1�
l673.�
%SECT[ON
12
ADOHyD
.344
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
1.72
�
146,92 |
12.50
194'98
'566.1
X9ECTION
17
RUNOFF
.012
2
2
,10
.O
4.00
24.00
1.67
.AA- i
12.01
13,69.4
�SECTlON
17
RUNOFF
.005
2
2
.10
,O
4,00
24.00
2.51
.AA- �
11.98
10'66-
2175'2
XSECT[ON
17
ADOHYD
,017
2
2
.10
'0
4.00
24.00
1'912
163,51 |
12.00
26.38
1598'8
XSECTlON
17
PEACH
.017
2
2
.18
.0
4.00
24.00
l.91
16.3.51 �
12.1O
'26.38
15917".8
YSECT[ON
19-
APX�HYO
1
2
2
'lO
.0
4.00
2 4.00
1.73
1.46.95 |
STRUCTURE
'T,
RE QOR
.361
2
2
'10
.O
4.00
2,��.00
1.7-31
147.66 !
12.50
199.16
1'8
K9ECT[ON
11.5
REACH
,361
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1'731
133,84
12,60
199.16
;;51,8
XSECTlON
15
RUNOFP
.003
2
2
.10
.O
4'00
24.0O
2,34
'AA- '
11.96
6'52
2303.1
>(SECT[ON
I9
ADOHYD
.364
2
2
.10
.O
4.O0
24.00
1.74
133'84
12'60
199'72
549.0
'
STR.UCTURE
11
RUNOFF
.0131
2
2
.10
.O
4.00
34.00
2.68
.AA-
11.96
3,57
2623.8
STRUCTURE
11
RESUOR
.081
2
2
.10
.O
4.00
24,011
2.74
151,52 |
12.01
2,C37
1887.3
XSECT[Ot'l
16
REACH
.O01
2
2
.10
'0
4.00
24.00
2'79
148'F4
12.11
2.57
1887.1
.
STPUCTURE
12
�UMOFc
.O01
�
2
,10
,0
4.0O
24.0U
2'�0
.AA-
11.96
�'19
2638'1
�T�!|CTUPE
12
A DDHYO
.O03
2
2
.10
,U
4.U0
24.00
2.7�
148,09
11.97
5.39
2094.�
><SECTlON
16
REACH
.003
2
2
.1U
.O
4.00
24.00
2.81I
148,72
12.07
5'38
2094.2
STRUCTURE
14
RUNOFF
.001
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
41
.AA-
11.95
3.33
3025'9
STRUCTURE
14
RUNOFF
.001
2
2
,10
.0
4.00
24'00
3'65
.AA-`
11.95
2.17
3099.3
STRUCTURE
14
RUNOFF
.001
2
2
.10
.0
4'00
24.00
2.69
.AA-
11.96
2.75,
2496.4
STRUCTURE
14
ADDHYD
,0.02
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24'00
3,50
,AA-
11.95
�.�0
�0�4.�
_~
STRUCTURE
14
ADDHYD
.003
2
2
.10
.0
4'00
24.00
19
.AA-
11.95
8,24
2839,8
STRUCTURE
14
AODHYO
.0015
2
2
,10
.O
4.00
24.00
3'01
.AA-
11.97
12,69
2319,6
`
XSECT[ON
19
REACH
'005
2
2
'10
.0
4,00
24.00
3'06
146'60
12'07
12'69
2319'5
~~
XSECTlON
1q
AOOHYD
'369
2
2
'lU
.O
4'00
24.00
1'76
133'85
12.60
201'02
544'4
>(SECTYON
13
REACH
'369
2
2
'10
.O
4.00
24.00
1'76
132.66
12.70
201'02
544'4
XSECTION
13
RUNOFF
'007
2
2
'10
.0
4'00
24.00
1'25
.AA-
11.98
8'20
1205'8
~~
}<SECTlON
13
ADDHYO
��6
'
2
2
lU
`
0
'
4 OO
'
24 U0
'
1.��
1�2'66
12,�0
2U1.89
�38,9
�N�
W -
TP20 XEO BAPTLETT 8ROOV ( 1984+COMD. )LATEST REU 11-0GPFEN MrN. pOWER | 111-'18 1 S|]MIMARY
QEu 05/02/83 CALIBRATED 80BFD ON MAY 27-28, 19S� PH13E 32
S|JmMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTEO PESULTS
OF
STAN[)HRD
AND EXECUT[UE
COmTROL [HSTR|JCTlONS
IN THE
OPDEP PFRFOPMEO
(A
STAR(*) AFTER
THE
PEAK DISCHARGE
TIME AND
RATE (CFS)
l,)ALUE'-:3
lNOICATES A FLAT T3P
HYDR0GPAPH
A
QUESTION MAPK(?)
INDICATES A HYDROGRHpH
WITH PEAK
Ac LAST PO[Nr.)
!
SE�-TION/
STANDAPD
PA I'll
ANTEC
MAlN
PREC[pITAT
[FIN
PEqV
OlSCHHRGE
!:�TRUCTURE
CON79171L
DPA[NAGE TOBLE
MOIST
TIME
-------------------------
RUNOFF
--------------------------------------
|O
OpERATIFIN
AREA
#
COmO
[NCREM
PEG TN1
A10111NT
DURATlOw
HMOUNT
ELEVATI,ON
TlM,E
RATE
PATE
`
(SO MT,)
(HR)
(HP)
(lN)
(H9,
{W)
(FT)
(HR)
(CFS)
|
STQUCTURE
6 A�DHYD
1.O08
2
2
.l0
.0
4�00
2�'O0
l.49
124.14
12.71
339.54
SFPUCTURE
6 RESUOP
1,008
2
2
,10
'U
a'00
24'00
1.49
123.98
187
316'37
314.0
>/SECT(ON
14 RE�CH
1.O08
2
2
.1O
.0
4'00
24'O0
1.49
103,76
~�
|
! N��
n�r
I
f! Ycf71 PAPTI PTT Pv'!n!< ( 19 +07IND )L- ATE ST PFU 1 A -0 G1--"`E,! ri V
. - I .
p P7 V3 .11 ill ?.", IP r A I- T P P A T'-- 17f P A F f-1 r, N M A Y ? 19 '::,, C5 P A I ?%, � --
Tf
TA
PI c
I -
-TFn
k:,-T9',Nf
T I UF
071- ITP"I-- -T N' THE
r A
;TAP AP7TEP THE
IPFAK n1':;17HA�--:;F
TPiF WID
PATF frPc',)
IJAL-AAPS
A P'L,'�T
TOP
W---'r--j.Pr1I-7,PPjP�4
A
1711IFST10N MPPK('?)
1NI)TI7,ATF9
0 HYCPCII
PAPH
ItI(TH PFAt<
A'= LA';T
P!I(NT.)
T T f)
c;TW,Jr!APr)
PA T N
ANTF1`7
MA ! t,.'
PPE!1 F I TAT I
-'"
0N
PEAV
"Zi
DS
cTP! 1!-T4 IPq
nPA 1 NAG97
TAR! F
Ml- ( S T
J
TT
i. ME
- - - -- - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - --- -
F-,!jt-1!-*1FF
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
-
i, n
F!
P P A T T I-1 N
A p E A
:11:
!^0!'n
1 h4CPCM
LBEG 1 N
AMOI_INT
D! J P T 10 1
PMU!-JNT
P E 1,)A T I C N
Y I hlC
PA
!'E
PA TF
I-j MT)
H::?
(HIP)
L4 I? .
l IN,
f HPI
Al
S7
JR,
c-rip I'-' T' IPA-
1
'I!l%.:1
p
12 C5 ?
n
1 4.
9
TP'!!"Ti 110F
P
25
.10
.0
4� 01)
2-a. 00
9
74
3
r I 1`111
2
I-j
4, , 0
2 0 0
2 1
•1
2 111
98'
)'2'2
4
w3 3
n
2
in
11
4,111.1
24. Oil
36,
�>2
0' 0 H',"
it
2
n
4,011
4. 13 I'l
1 6 i
6
1
cCl 'TP)N
5
F;'FA!-'H
44
3 0
'2
2
0
4,00
24, 09
1.61,
1� 6
. 74
2,
137
rpt M- TURE
P! I f, I it C,
1715,
2
12
1. n
0
4. 00
24. 00
3
•1 '11
rp,!I-TUPE
-P
p
1-)
0
4.01)
'2 4 , 0 U
.82
9'.*) 5
. 2, 4
C5.
7 )l
--.L
1
L
T cit'i
4,
PF A
175
2
2
10
0
oil
24, n I',
P, 3
P, f-f H '?
5
2
2
10
11
4.01)
2.4. 0!)
1 . 33
.9-9-
1? 41
1 1)
9
-al
�Q!.tf TI!,Pc.
-,ut-
C'-
.10
0
4,01)
oil
1 37
�PA-
12 41
1? 1")
9
2
-P
-TT
-�'F! 13 �j
6
-ACH
p E
F-1 5
2
-
10,
.0
4, 111)
00
1 3
1 2
2' 4
1 1
1 1� 11
9 3
-2:
-
C,
P-ACH
2
2
.1 9
.11
4, nO
24. On
3
1 .3.
147.
94
120
04
Plt.
7
ill C5
9
.10
1)
4. 00
-1.4, On
1, , 411
Q.W
'12 . 1'5
'A,a,
9
.6.
,-zFf- T I ON
7
ADDHY-!
62) 0
2
10
1)
4. 13 1)
,d
2. 01)
1 - 3-
11
I- . r�g
g-I
12 7:
r 9'.!!- T I , P P'
1.7
PUt
0 1) 5
01-1
2 00
1 1) 16-
C� TO! ICTI IPF
I ?
P P U! 1 P
11115
2
2
0
0
4, 1311
24, 0
1 0 A.
2 ?'P,
. F.3
1 Il
L;
'x"; F! T I f7i N
ADF HYn
6'
1)
111)
2 0 0
1 3L-
1-`
1
c rP!!I-Tl-lPc
4
PFC1 )I-3P.
6 2' 5
4. oil
2 4 OP
1 3;�
11
3 1
12 . 6. 7
1 3p
, Rt;
�,-31ECT I C-N
p
PEACI-4
6'7-)-,
2
1
0
4. on
24, 00
34
13 3
. 2
1 771
1 '38
, 8
'22
1)
-PrT 11 -1 N
?
P!-NJCFF
n 116,
12
19
n
4, 03
24, 0!1
1 8-1
A -
1.1 , 9t,
-1,
49
'1
5
T I rlI
ADF)H,-"r!
67� 1
'2
2
ill
0
4. 01)
24. Oil
I � 3;
13 3
2'2
9
7
3r,
-3
nr59
2
.10
0
4, 1) ll
24, oil
1 '74,
4� 1� -
12.44
16',
9 4
-
JON
I. I
P1,11r-1 1,71 � F
1304
2
1.11
13
4 . 1.113
24,011
1.31
-p-q-
11 . 9:7
6 9
6
F C T [ 17) N
29
Pi CiD H,,'O
2) 6 3
24
10
0
4.00
12 4 . 0113
1.73
2 4,
23
1 2
4 1
7
I !'-IN
pi -It'll IPP
0 5- 0
0
11
4, 00
24, 01)
.4114-
12
9
4
-�':3 F r- T 11+1 N
I 'I
AD HYf-�'
13
1)
2
1 1.1
0
4,010
24. 00
1 6 6
2) 112
. 7 '12
1 41.
196
. 3
9
'��SFCT P-)N
1-1
PFACH
71. 3
2
2
10
13
4. 00
24. Oil
1.66.
J./,6.00
12 51
•12, A,
- 3
L594,
9
Ir
rP1-TIJPF
-
PUNOWP
.009
2
10
.0
4, 00
94, O!l
I , 9p
-? 1-1. 7.
9
TPIJCTI IPF
- 1.-
13
RUH01FIF
003
10
A
4, no
24, n 0.
2.30
0-
11 96
7,
9 1
-
'2 32
-
STPUCTI!c
13
P E'--)* U 0 P
003
2
1)
0
0
4. 00
2-4. 01-1
2.38
199.43
12 . Oil
5
, 419
1-?2
2
'/r,:Er- T I ON
I R
A D n- H
012
2
2
Ill
n
4. 00
24. 0
2 Oe
207.61
11.97
'2?
. 31
'1 Q ?q
0
I
7v?r! t !C
P-APT!._ETT
c, t �,
,.'R ]i_,s;
u
'1 . _ +i'!,rl,_•.
1 n ,
7,_A
rc c
,._;T P,. U
�_vo �c
11.-n" .,,. !.,-,
E...! Mr 1.
-t
P!-,E,.CEE? !
1t u r
..
, t r
S:.,h? 1c"r
�, -
r:r.)
r! f!,),f?'
_
.. ,
r�lt._. iFF
� . L r -..
�T,_. ) fi
-+ r l t.
ate; f !.,1
_! F7
M rY '.
` J ❑ `J F.
[ ... ;
, . A T t,. t C P
Q,.,. :rn ,rl
CI t" L
i ...,
Z •'7
'=:!_)MM!ARY T
-ti>='!_F
Z _ cc!
E!:= TFfi R!= Sl I!-Tc-
OF
ti TAhlt')A
10 AN1 j E.>F-!
'!_! T T OF
C!-!r,1TP"7!__
T t,4C TP!_!i- T I nr`1'_,
111 THF
PPr)CQ ocPFCJPMFID
(A
STAR r AF TPR
THE
PEAK CI
i SCHAR!,F_
TIME AND
RATE (
C- F c-) l.!,-II_!E
r •1Ci I �ATFS A FLAT T!`.P
H` IP!-.!!:; � =,P,
A
I�1 !F= T T f�l 1 Mi+P
(?
< l
�1�I I�r
I I _PT,
C`_ t+ !i`j(1
!7 -,P
.n!- tP!-!
61 H P,_ AI+,
t T
A, I_+a'=T P!'1
`' _
t HT, )
'-'FF-1 T T ! !h•1.'
'=:TAhJD,=aRn
F'A I hI
ANTEC
r"A i N
PRP-C 1 P I TAT
I FIN
crC!!!-T!!cc
rtCr.lTr�C-il_..
C;t?iitrlAl;F
T!�P_,!-F
f^,C:!t:?T
Ttr1F
------_--_---------------
R!JP'IIiFF
------_-•-------_----------------------
t !1
1 !Pc!?t:\
._ r ! ! N
ARE r?
�a
! �Or!n
_.
_
t ti.lhoFr)
�, _
-EG j h�
�+��!!,! !r'1
_ - T
! 1 I ti!h,
C ..RAT .1
r�l.-n !r ,
A lr
cr1AT I I_Ir!
CL.�
T Mc
I.
'=';�t T"_
Gig )T
C-
(=lu Mt 7
(HR)
(HP)
(I!`.I)
(HR)
r f1,11
(FT)
tHR )
fi F'=
AI_
cT-f'1PM I
r r_ F' r t
,._ �T I.7h'1
,]
]. •.
REACH
�:'.i=r,= H
2,
.Oat
'2
'2
,1!�
l
.!.
/ 1
�+..!)!:
rt ,/,'; 1
c ,OI.
2
L,11
•2 1 "7 G
.1
•7 1 7
1t..!.�
•? z? X
_... . !.
•1 4 '"7 ��
L•..
,9
='f•Ot t C
8
1 tC'C
P! h.lf_,.
1
0'
2
,L
10
.n
4. Oil
•'I
t4,00
7 F
L,. 3
,a�)-
'I 't 9..
G
_.4.G,
•-t�. •t r
,J
V
AID01 YD
.014
'
l
!
Lf
`.]
.
1111 _9.4
!
.74
72
c:I- !I!,T!,Pl=
a
p!.frl l=�
01 ,
2
2
.'10
0
4- 00
24, O!i
2 . 6.2
Oa-
•! •1 a L
'2: 1•
�1^
.?
occ!tt p
1
]
7
7,crR!!!^Tltpc
=
..,=Ft^T Int1
Z'?
AnrtHYr)
;n?
2
2
1!]
"
4. 1117
2=' . 011
7 , 79
lrtnj
Z�
-
,�r.flH`-'�''
�4'r
- L
^
c.
2
'f1
i
n
4.Cln
2=-,11n
-1
7•a
y r..
1_ a�
s.
i Fn
ryr, =t
�_9
7
w't F' TIr�r1
1..
Pt tN' FP"
n) '�
2
1 l
t
9 t'
:crT(n!`1
19
;4
3=x
2
?
!_!
0
4.0n
?r.0n
7..72
1r`,,9?
•;,=�t_Tt'7r1
1`_
P!_ih•itl=F
nI]`'
2
2
1!]
n
c;,n0
24-0'1
1.611
+)y-
11,97
'J.
'1
`." �E�T t !,r,l
1''
;�C.'•!-''H`�'C.I
.344
'z
2
. 1. !]
. fl
�� 1
O !,
A. t
2 •- . Q .1
1 . 7?
9 rL 9,l
,, :.a,_ . _
•� F
_ . , Q
P. V��
F.
"=,"' T t.l�rl
1'
P1 t' 4,nFL
!�12
2
2
10
4. On
24 , 0'?
1,67
F! TTnN
7
!?!!r1C?F=
n!j5
2
2
1.CC
n
!_ . IIn
?: . 11!)
2.5:1
X'A-
!"1.'?:�
111. «
'? !
?
` !"TIn_t1
17
Ar1�uYD
I]I7
'
2
.'1!1
!]
�,0!)
2:i,n0
1.99
1.63,'^1
�''.lJi'?
L r.
:' 3!1
�,r, -•
1�
PLa;. H
017
?
1n
0
r
�.00
11
?_ .0•.
1-91
F. '1
1
'1 '-1 1• t
`'1 s: ? `�
'R l=
,a
A D r) H. `r' r''
3 -, 1.
2
�, 0 0
1.73
146 n F
o F•,
4. G; ,
crP!_� T! toc
F
oc_'!!�°R
. 3-111
2
2
. '10
. 0
4. 00
24. 0 .
1 . r3
1-7. r-,6
_
13FF'! T 10.t-1
1
RcACH
361
'2
2
11)
0
4,01)
24. 00
1 . 73
1 Y3 . 84
"1_'2 . 60
1-99 16
C�c:'1
, 8
X F!-'TT> !1
1r^
P!_!N0FF
. nl]3
2
?
i!1
i)
4. 00
24. On
2.3
!)�]-
)_1.9 .
-,,5`?
_'T.13-4
1
„.,F-i--rI!' N
1G
Af)r1HYr-I
3;Gi
2
;?
1,)
!]
. 0!)
2= . 0!]
1, 74
1.x3,'=
I.;?. `.,,
1,„? ,,,
�:.:�
!]
_rpt r_T tcic
]'1
^r!hl�!FF
!]0'1
2
2
1!]
n
4,nI]
24.00
2,6.E
,A�7-
1 ! ?_
x.F�
C rRt'•!-'T.!Pq
•1 _
oc!;; f-!p
001
`I
2
10
0
!+. 01)
2 0I1
'-,, 74
1`i1 q`'
•I", I)-!
o-
7
,.,;Fr_'Ttrrr.�
1;
aCa�'H
!]n'i
2
?
10
!;
4.00
'2�,n!7
2.79
1=►a qq ,
1:_'.'.L'1
7,G
�•
!='rP!lITI_!FE
1'2
P!_!`1t'!Fe
0!)'1
2
`?
.1.0
!�
�=.nn
24.nn
2.7[?
Ai?-
11,?6
3.1?
7-3'=.1
FP! ,rTt tc�c
1'?
ra�C'E!"f?
0!, z
2
2
. Z n
0
4 . n!j
2=' !]"
2 , 75
1 �!? . Cl9
t.'1 .
78
!)A
c.
r-E,'TI.!7r)
1>~
RcA' �!
nI)3
2
2
10
!)
4.110
24.00
2.80
1�2 12)
11,0
zo
CTRI !CTlJPE
'14
P!.!rd!"1FF
00'1
2
2
1!)
!?
! , 00
2-. 00
3 . 4'1
. 8a-
11 . "^
3. _-
z;l;'G
°
�:TF.! �4�T!'R!=
14
r-1,r.l!;cC
O!]1
2
2
.:1n
!]
. n!�
24, 0!1
3.6
A!+!-
11 .9
. 17
3099
,
STR!,!CTt.1Pc
14
PI-It•10,17
001
:?
2
. 1!)
0
4. n0
24.013
2 .69
499-
11.96
2 .75
2496
.4
CTR!JCTUPE
14
AD" )H D
00;'
?
0
.10
!]
4, 08
24. On
3.50
-9P-
11.95
(5 c !n
31)G4.4
cTP!!rT!JcRc
14
Ar,0H`!`-')
003
2
2
.10
!)
4, 00
24.0n
3.19
,AA-
11.95
8.2='
2'D z -ZQ
o
1
cTR! !CTI JPE
Iz-
AD[:HYCI
005
2
2
. 10
i)
4 00
24.00
3 . n 1
AA-
11 .97
12. 69
2 3IQ
, -• :.
"SF_CTII'!hd
19
REACH
0!35
2
2
.10
n
4.00
24. Oil
3.0-•
146.60
112.07
12.c•9
231'?.
YSIECT I0N
15
ADDHYf'!
369
2
2
. 10
. 0
4.00
24. On
1.76
133.95
12.61)
201 , 02
F44,
4
`<SECT Il ON
13
REACH
369
2
�
10
0
4. OO
24. 00
1 , 76
132 . 66
12 . 7!]
2n 1 . !]2
544.
4
XSECTI0N
13
R!I!`11DIFF
.007
2
2
.10
0
4, 00
24, 00
1.25
.19
11.98
8.21)
1205.8
T I? i vc.l1
PARTLETT 6ROOK
('1924+CONIn. ILATECT 9FU
11,07-2,2
-,'Et
F" A I-, T 9
R T Flr) P
TV)Y
P A t s I T R, 1
TAOIJ7
1, CF71-P-CTED
RESULTS Oq
c-;TANr,-)APD-
ANID P--'FCIJTf',)F
CF�NTPOL
PN'-:Tc.:.'!jr-TjONC
1,4 TL4c7
1'�PnFp P E P F! 1 R"',
El
r
c
STAR --�FTFP THE
PPAV' D i
SCHAP -,E
T 1!'!F-- PNCt PAT-7
f 17PS ) UALLIES
� F 0
T NIDICATES L ( T T
H* .
,-IrIP PAP
QUEST (cir-I
MA kl('?)
[NDICATES
P HYOPOGP�-iPH
lid'TH. Pc
PM,,AS LA'=T PI
-I I NT,
PA I H
AN T F.
-IN
PPFC I P I TAT T
H
rOl !I- TIJPP'
-!->j rpl-11
I-
P A I N A G, F TABLE
M.10 I ST
T I m,1
--------------------------
P!.-! N I I F F
--------- -
r)
nPF9AT T!'�N
APFIA
ik
CoNn
T t�14 C p c* ri
Ppf-, r tl
-)O'l
DI IPAT 10".
(-! I ll T
A -M, -1
Cl
ELEIJiAT 1 ON,
T f. r!F
R;4 T P
PA T F
M I
(HP
HP. f I
C HP
PT i
Al T P czv'N
A T P
I STORM
1
F T 111 N
.1.
AD HYC!
4 fill
2!, n !I
2 f!
!F
0 n
4A.
•I
.? 3 92
'1'2 , P 7
3-1 7 '"In
3
Y'z
1. 00p,
2
?
.10
4. 1) 11
2 0 0
7-
�
�
�
TP?U XE0
REU Og/02/M
NORTH SPOOK LAST REU[TED 11-08-88 (GREEN MTN. POWER)
AID T'^��/EvEta If\EJr-
JOB 1 SUMMARY '
PAGE 27
S!|MnAPY TABLE
1 - SELECTED RESULTS
OF
STANDARD
AND EXECUTiUE
CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS
IN THE
ORDER PERFORMED
CA
STAR(*) AFTER
THE
PEAK DISCHARGE
TIME AND
RATE (CFS)
(/ALUES
INDICATES A FLAT TOP
HYDROGRAPH
A
C]UES[{ON MARK(?)
INDICATES
A HYDROGRAPH
WITH PEAK
AS LAST POINT.)
SECTION/
STANDARD
PAIN
ANTEC
MAIN
PRECIPITATION
PEAK
DISCHARGE
STRUCTURE
CONTROL
DRAINAGE TABLE
MOIST
TIME
-------------------------
RUNOFF
---------
----------------------------
ID
OPERATION
AREA
4
COND
[NCREM
BEGIN
AMOUNT
DURATION
AMOUNT
ELEUHTION
TIME
RATE
RATE
(SO MI)
(H?)
(HP)
TN`
(HR)
([N)
(FT) �
(HP)
(CFS`
(CSM)
1 STORM
STYUCTURE
20
RUNOFF
,007
2
2
.10
,0
4'00
21.0O
2.83
.AA-
12.01
14.07
2164.1
XSECTION
2
REACH
.007
2
2
.10
'0
4,00
24.00
2,81
146,08 �
12,l1
14.08
2165.6
STRUCTURE
31
RUNOFF
,002
2
2
.10
,0
4�00
24'00
2,59
.40- /
11,96
0,50
2400'6
STRUCTURE
31
RESVOR
,002
2
2
.10
'0
4.00
24.00
2.66
194.95
11.97
4.65
2084.0
X9FCTION
37
REACH
.002
2
2
,lO
'0
4'00
24.00
2.61
191.15
12.07
4.65
2583,15-
STR/1CTURE
37
RUNOFF
'001
2
2
.10
,O
4.00
24.00
2'80
,AA- /
11'97
1.73
2467.2
STRUCTURE
32
AODHYD
. 00�
�
2
. 10
^ 0
4 O0
.
�4 O0
.
2 6�
`
1�0 84 '
.
12.00
'
� ��
.
�20� 5
,
STRUCTURE
32
RESUOR
.003
2
2
.10
. .0
4.00
24.00
2.31
�
191.00 `
12,02
6.00
2399,1
XSECTTON
38
REACH
.003
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
3'11
187,50
12.12
6.00
2399'0
STRUCTURE
33
RUNOFF
.002
2
2
.lU
'U
4.00
21.00
2.87
,QA-
11'96
4.56
2883.2
STRUCTURE
33
PDDHYO
.004
2
2
.10
.O
4'00
24.00
3'02
187.87
12.03
7.50
1795.6
STRUCTURE
33
RESUOR
.004
2
2
,10
.0
4.00
24.00
2,84
198.02 \
12.01
8.08
1924.5
XSECT{ON
39
REACH
.004
2
2
.10
'0
4.00
24.00
2,83
182,04
12.11
B 08
1924.4
STRUCTURE
36
RUNOFF
.001
2
2
.10
.O
4100
24.00
2'81
,4A-
11.9S
1.33
2378.3
STRUCTURE
36
RESUOR
.001
2
2
,10
,0
4.00
24.00
2.82
187.66
|
11.98
1'33
2375'6
XSECTlON
40
REACH
,001
2
2
.10
,0
4.00
24.00
2.76
186.94 /
I2.08
1.33
2374'2
STRUCTURE
35
RUNOFF
OO1
'
2
2
.l0
.0
�.00
��'O0
2.9U
,4A- �
11.95
2'60
2768.7
STPUCTURE
3q
ADDHYD
.002
2
2
,10
.0
4.00
24'00
2.85
199'18 | !
11.98
3.55
2363.2
STRUCTURE
35
RESUOR
.002
2
2
.10
.O
4,00
22.00
3.13
189.15 1
11.98
3.40
2302.3
XSECT[ON
41
REACH
.002
2
2
.10
,U
4.00
24,00
2.70
185.84
12-02
3,45
2302.1
STRUCTURE
34
RUNOFF
'002
2
2
.10
.O
4.00
24,00
3,08
.AA-
11'95
4'11
2739.0
'
STRUCTURE
34
ADUHYD
.003
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2,89
182.68 !
11,98
6.70
223V1
STRUCTURE
34
RE9UOP
.003
2
2
.10
,O
4'00
24.00
3.04
192'68
12.01
6.67
2222.9
XSECT\ON
42
REACH
.003
2
2
,10
.0
4.00
24'00
2.97
178,17,
12'11
6.67
2222.6
STRUCTURE
43
ADDMYD
,007
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.89
180'69 '
12,11
14.75
2048'6
XSECTION
8
REACH
,007
2
2
.10
.0
4'00
24.00
2,92
119'56
12.21
14'75
2048.6
KSECTlON
2
RUNOFF
.007
2
2
.10
.O
4,00
24.80
2.83
.AA-
12.01
16.01
2164.1
XSECTlUN
2
ADDHYD
.014
2
3
.10
.O
4.00
24.00
2.82
147.11
12.06
28.27
2834.0
XSECT[ON
3
RUNOFF
.003
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24'00
2'12
AA-
11.99
6'00
1818.8
-~
XSECTlON
4
REACH
.003
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.11
155,55
12.09
8'00
1818.7
%SECTlON
4
RUNOFF
'005
2
3
'lO
.0
4.00
24.00
2'29
'A4-
12'09
7'81
1530'8
=~
XSECT{ON
4
AODHYO
,008
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24'00
2.21
155.73
12.09
13.81
1643'9
|
/
a�L
0
TO'211 XF!
REU !jGs/ 02/.R3
NORTH BROOK LAST RFUISFD 11-08-8P (,GREEN M-N. POb.1F-P,
lh1B 1 SIJr'trtAP.y
PNC:;E. 28
,UMMAR`{' TA91_F
1 - S! LECTFD RFS!_1LTS
OF
STANOARD
AND EXECUT I E
CONTROL
I NSTRUCT I U IS
I N THL
O!9DER PERF!-liP, ED
(A
STAR(*) AFTER
THE
PEOK DISCHAR!--,E
TIME AND
RATE (CFS) UALUES
INDICATES A'FLAT TIP
HYDROGRAPH
A
01JEST I OH MARk:.
( ? )
I NO I CATES
A HYDROGRAPH
611 TH PEAK AS LAST PO
I NT . )
SECT I INN.'
�
STANDARD
RAIN
ANTE+
MAIN
PRECIPITATION p I TAT I ON
P`��K:
C? I SCHARlyE
STRUCTURE
CONTRO!_
DRr?INAGE TABLE
MI:IIST
TIME
-------------------------
RUNOFF
--------------------------------------
10
OPEP-iT
ION
AREA
�k
COND
I N C R E M
REG ! N
AMOUNT
DURAT I ON
AMOUNT
ELFUAT I ON
T I ME
RATE
RATE.
(SO MI)
(HP)
(HP)
( IN)
(HR)
(IN)
(FT)
(HP)
(CF:��
ALTERNATE
1 STORM 1
XSECT ION
5
REACH
002
2
2
.113
.0
4. V,
24.01)
2.22
1413.73
12. 19
13.81
16,43 . 9
;'SE!^TIC!hl
2
ACiI1HYD
022
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24. 00
2.59
147.51
1''. 10
38.82
1741. n
'NSECT1ON
1
RUNOFF
039
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.011
1.96,
.8n-
12,15
44.53
1141.9
XSFCTII+N
5
REACH
039
'?
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.96
1.46.21)
12.25
44.53
1.141.9
XSECT I ON
5
ADDHYD
061
2
2
.10
.0
4.011
24.00
2.19
146.51
12. 18
75 . RE
'1238 . 1
STRUCTURE
8
RI_INOFF
, 005
2
2
. 10
.0
4, 00
24. 00
1.36
.88-
11.9,
7.20
'1440.3
STRUCTURE
I?
RE':307IR
. 005
2
2
.10
.0
4,013
24.00
1.39
175.71
12.'.17,
1.98
396.5
XSE!-T ION
13
REACH
0!15
2
2
.10
.0
4. 00
2=:. 0n
1.39
172.32
12.23
1.98
396 , 4'
Ef-TION
46
R!..INCFF
002
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.01)
.73
A19-
12. 10
1. n4
474. 3
XSErTION
46
t=!_!h,OFP
003
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
66
, --p-
12.04
1.25
453.E
f E!�T 10 N
46
ADDH�'r_�
. 0 n5
2.
2
. 111
Il
4. 1] 1]
24. 0 n
. 69
189 . 49
12 . 0'�
2 . 35
4` _ .
`.',FCTl0N
44
RUNOFF
.001
2
2
.10
.0
4.01)
24.00
2.811
-!+1-
11.97
2.99
2474.9
;'SECTION
44
ADI)HYD
. 006
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24. 00
1 . 11
173.91
12.1111
F.. 10
822,1
YSECTION
44
R1,01OFF
.13015
2
2
.10
.13
00
24.00
3.17
.8n-
11.9b
13.97
2851.1
:!SEC.TION
44
ADDHYD
.1311
2
2
.'10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.0121
122.94
:11.97
18.82
17112.0
"SECT10N
45
RUNOFF
001
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.01.1
2.78
.8A- 111.9=)
2.29
26F-7.4
XSECTION
45
REACH
001
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24,00
2,88
120,10
12.06
2.28
265h.3
y.:SF!-TION
44
ADDHYD
.012
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.01)
2.08
1'3.99
11.9:'
20.68
1735.1
'�;:-AEI=:TIINN
46
RUNOFF-
002
2
`?
.10
.0
4.011
24.00
1.78
. PQ-
11.96
3.89
1853.2
XSFCr I I_1hJ
46
REACH
n+12
2
2
. 10
. 0
4. n!1
24. 0 n
1 . 86
190,99
1.2. 06
3 . 89
1!352 . 9
:(:SECT I ON
44
ADDHYD
.014
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2 . 05
11915.66
11.92
23 . 64
1686, 1
vSSCTION
47
!9!JhaOFF
.003
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24. 00
.70
12. Or
1.97
579.7
XSECTION
4�
ADDHYD
.017
1_
2
.10
.0
4.0n
24.01)
1.79
1!36.75
11.92
25.57
1467.8
Y,SECT ION
44
RUNOFF
.001
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.59
Ala-
11.96
2.11
2422.9
XSECTION
44
ADDHYD
.018
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.011
1.82
187.93
11.98
27.66
1512.1
XSECT10N
44
REACH
.018
2
2
.10
.0
4,011
24.01-1
1.84
187.93
12.08
27.66
1512.1
XSECTION
5
R!.-1NOFi=
.017
2
2
.10
.13
4.00
24. 00
.67
.88-
12.07
7.31
435.2
STRUCTURE
7
ADDHYD
,023
2
2
111
A
4.00
24.00
1.74
1711.07
12.00
29.54
1268.3
STRUCTURE
7
RUNOFF
, 020
2
2
In
0
4.00
24.00
2.42
.88-
11.96
45.45
2295.4
STRUCTURE
7
ADDHYD
.043
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.06
189.04
11.99
67.47
15615.8
STRUCTURE
7
ADDHYD
.060
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.67
192.19
12.00
73,79
1232.0
STRUCTURE
7
RESUOR
.060
?
?
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.67
168.34
12.23
26.08
435.5
XSECTION
12
ADDHYD
.121
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.93
164.32
12.18
101.9n
840.8
XSECTION
8
REACH
.121
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.01)
1.93
121.05
12.28
101.90
840.8
XSECTION
8
RUNOFF
.039
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.73
.89-
12.22
51.65
1331.2
XSECTION
8
ADDHYD
.160
2
2
.10
.0
4.01)
24.00
2.13
121.82
12.26
152.21
951.4
M
r�
CL"!
sy1
r-:
4.
1--
Z
7
�1
LIJ
a:
f ri
CiCI
OD
G
1
-i
a-1
f. l
LL•
U;
D
Lli
OQ
E-
f'fT;i
LL
J
n
h�•
r'.
Lr
C�.
C
W W
x a.
r�-
r.1
Ll:
E'--
tM
M.(\.\t Tjc
U.1
i ul
C,r. ( rI , ,
�N LP OL ram,
Lv
N CD
F- LL
Cri
o1eIC=ra
NN i=`7
0 -
; C, m7:
NM
-+
I U I
O- Ul I
cT •-•' I
C) I
Ln I
0 Y I Lli
a- :I i Z LY
G LIJ I T
C1 0- 1 I--
W T 1
E_ I
LY 0 i
rI r- 1 Z
LL. i- 1 Q
U'r-
Q_C I CH
J I - L
QY LL I ll!
Ltl I J
O C F W
1
0 Lf1
LIJ
LLi !-
] !I LL F-
^" LL Z
0 D Z
ZC
�L
H L -
r
ZEel L-L
C. w 1 Z
I ^
CC I E-ax
J I iI T.
1 Ch
F- Ci! Z I D
P. of C Cl I d
Z LL - I
U c H- I
f-
C. ii., d. I -i Z
I o�
F- C T- I Z �-
O_ F- U I C
C1 .� LLI I
U Ci 3 0` 1
1
LIJCT I
0, 1 Z �^
W C I --
L LX I uT
LE; r; I w
UII-0 100
LL, 0
`'wi;
wfn>- Z
_ d T ZWUJLI-
C, CI 1: Q T-
T
C r
U i co
C, W
D: d f•- t_i I-
C C W Cn d
C-' :Y f .--. Z
Z. <I Z C. 0
<I W C. C F. U
F- 0_ L
U+
LiJ Z W
LL T .- I
OL- <ICD4
01 C
Ti CL E
I- LLI CC
J C
-' LL L LIJ
LL:' C 'S -
Q' O Zl1JZ
d -4- C<ZC`
Ll_1 Q fJ., Q Tj
F Z. LLI Ci
-
w f!i r,
J Z
1 L' C C C• _; C.
C 4: 1-
I
L La:
z 0 U1
L! CL
LLi U"1 C
,
1�
:j
F- LI.i
CL
s �:c
i
Z L1 a
_1 Ui
U ff) UJ
ol
O`-IJ•-t*`:v-+Ic,
NC'i +N C,
w N9 C,
W
wwit, u,
't
\7 M Ls
rt, Lry N C' \-t
cl, 1 =. -4 C, lr•
--i C7` CN Ci
Ca T. --! -i
N (•.1 N
.-i p -4 Lr t*`.
--1 T C' I C.!
N T Lr+ N '•C
M T \T 17
T.
o:+ CI! Ul r.
7 T ?, T )
r,. Tj C7 M L(,.
y_, N T! C, o
10 vJ 01 +T
:7 .0 -, 0\ -AD r.! re : , M, r\ r-1 U, fX: y_ C' .0 Q,. •C IS. -'+ C� T T
-.t,"t,rc1Ul N pir<, -0 r�, M 7 \7 N r\n N all oNNN'
LS lS • 0 N G r• \7 1-7 p-.i rr_ N ri \7 - + N lC L M `C K F\.
T M
T 0�l
Ln of
N t\
N 14
o 4
M
tr• M
T Lr �.ti . fi.. =
.-+ -: r. -.. 9..
r
--I C:, ..C, r)-i
rn mi T- +(%
or is- r, N ,C
G r, Lf. o N
-i rs ft) [\
`C is
cli N r^, T CV
---i -a --+ 1-1 C
7-1
N C, c o•
I]•. = C, U. M.
T LT. O. --i Q.
G C. T. C� -
N -I o �4
Q o
N Cl CJ C,!
CI N N CJ Ca
CN
N n, Cl -
:-a rJ (^-J - n1
-+ - N -1
J
N N C i N
-a N
..., .-t --'1 -1 -i
•_± -4 --1 ---1 --
-1
.-•i 1-1 r-! --•i
ri r4 -4 i 4 r-I
--i --1 r-i --1 -1
r1
--a --+ --d -1 -I -i
i
IS. 0-- .c: CP p
I 1 1
CL ct : Q, C: cr
I I
le 111 i. Ull CT
1
- O O ram, ,7
1 1 i
c rl: `7 Ul ,T:
1
G p cr C, CC
I I
Cy Cr r_11- r-+ --•1 -
G 17 01 CP --+
q, N 071 N CF'
C 'C' c' N CP
ul -- ---4 G' T
C I Ct a- rM Ct,
If% 1C CL` IC ;--!
CF `yV N N CT' -�
. . . . .
N `7' n. O^
. . . . .
Cr h.
. . . .
r.. N T.
. . . . .
T•. N N -+
. . . . .
-+ oD
. . . . .
D .o �o p7
. . . . . .
IT, N N f\.
j li
W. L{`. d
4 !S LS` Lr
m r.
n ' C 10 11
L!` Nt
-•� r•1 --i N
-•a e-i
--i -•i
r-i -•,
-i H r-I --I
r-1 -•4 H -i
`C, -y. 7C: A LS`" v Q`. Lt•. Q. n• M I ir•: TI p T 17 _: C: r'•: V.l T r'. U`• r`, +JJ \7 r`.. C•. m N \? N
-1 -+ -i I.t•, --I T. •.0 W ; `j N N O` 00 M N N N N of � ---10 CD �, 0o t\ C� p� -i N �O 00 00 CD CD
N cJ N -, i - - e-i N N r-\ M .-•i -•I r-• - i M ri r i N •7 - i M -f N -t -+ --I rI M M
C_. C-, C C, _. C. C:. =1 p = _. r-: C:, C: C• ,-. C. - C- C C•. C C, r-- C• C, C' CC- O O CO C+ C:-
CD C7 o C• Cl Cl o C C7 Q C- o o C7 C, CO C 0 CD o C, G C, Cl o C, CD o o C, C7 o C7 O C7 0 0
�7 17 \7 \t '-1? \7 17 \7 17
NCJNNCJ NNNCIO N CJNNCJN NC-IC•l CVCN NCJNNN NNNNN NNNNN N
p r: p r-: r-1 p 4=1 r•, C• C. C-: C: C. C, C• p C = = C. C, C. C: C. C, C, 1= C, p a, C7 G G C, C, C7
C^ o Cl r r_-, o C, o O G C, Ca CD C, G o C7 o C7 Cl 0 0 0 o Cl o G o C? CD C7 Cl o o O
\Y 17 17 V 7 V \7 17 \7 \7 - 4 17. \7 17 14 14 \7 14 -1 'Q `7 .7 \7 4 4 4 \7 4 `7 'Q .4 14 14 q,
,_. p C, C. C, C� G C7 C, r-, G C. C. CO 0= C, p C) C p C. C: p :� CD p 17, p 1= p p C: C, p
r, C, G CD C, C' = C, O G C, G C C+ p n C G p C? G C G O Cl C. C• C, O Cl p r C-; .--: C: r.
r-1 -1 -i r-i r-+ -i -•i --4 -1 --4 14 -1 r♦ -A -a -4 4 -A r✓ ri -i - f --4 -4 -i --i -•i a-i -1 -- - --4 --1 --t
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CvNNCACJ NClC' -NN NCVCIA CIA C4 NCvCJNC-: C r14C1LNN IN, (VCJNrV CdCaC.1CIA N N
NNNNN CJNCJC,1N cJNNCa0-1 NNNNN NNNC'JCA NNNCIA Cd NNNC-dN N
j`l r•. n '`7 `7 --4 Lr U, T. W v •7 •j . Cl Cl IC 10 \1 -+ `7 `7 -+ --i Lr, rl i\ N CD v:1 C., N N N
'r C, Ca -•+ - C•1 1 " C-• Q 7 a -+ -t No 10 C, ',C C. C. C: C G = p C. C:• C. --i -4 co T, C7 C,
--i -i --+ C: C: o C1 C7 C, G o G G C7 O G C, C7 C' Cl G G C. C7 o C. C7 p = C. C'. C7 C+ p O C:)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d CY. it 0:
LL. d IL C! LL.
C LL O: LL
C d Or U. Ci
Li- Ll. Cl (It LL
0_ d LL Cl
LL. d 0 LL
Lk
C, It C1
LL >- LL >- 11.
> = LL 0 ly
r `- C+ LL :
LL LL ` C. LL
C. : U- >- Y
LL > : - T LL
0
TD U0:
Ell T0— C,
Tf-•0a0
T21OT
003:_ 0
D 3:03:U
O3:X(10
D
ri Li Lf1 C �,-. fj'
Z CD Z C; Z
G C Z IJl Z
0 cl Ul L d
G Z L Ln L
IJ 1 !=• 0 'S.
Z d C_, C Z
Ul
f_; LIJ W =1 LLI
-1 d :1 C-1 -I
u LLi -1 LLI _+
C fa UJ -1 C1
-1 -1 d LI.I _',
LIJ d D u li
0 d 0 uj r1
LLI
Q0.0 G: LL
a11l' <1 L
(IO 0-1Or-L
/I<1CL :<1
RCrQQO.
m<IO_ (ICL
QCC.(k0_'
LL. ,�= N Q• M M:
IcI t+ .0 •C 'ti7
C -c Lr, tf : r.
(`.. I XI r. (',
-+ --a --I -4 C•1
c 1 4 x7 \7 N
N i\ N N o
C
Q
Z lij Lsy Ll
LL'
LL, Lu
Lu LLI
U_ W UJ LLI LL
LLJ
Lli
LO
LL ZQ� Z O. It
Z t i Z O_
z L_ Q. O ._
Z Q: CL Z Z
O. Or Q_ a m
a Z L Z Z
Z Z Z Z O:
Q_
_-I
r-.0C„DD
C-,0 _,C,
r-;-,M,C,0
:D
5000C
0000-+
J I- r ? F- U r '
r s
F- F- Cl .' ►-
�
F r_?
U
_� u u Ll
C C
u 1- F - I- F-
!- F- 1- f- C'
U
QIL'' -' L' = -
i; C, u C. �+
L, U _ U
U _ , f ; L;
-_D -1 -1 D -_,
T U U U U
U U U Ll D=,
Lit iY Lo 0' CC
G- la, LL1 w 0_
Lli LL1 a a LL`
LIJ a ce II w
E (h E Q Of
a LLI G.; LLJ LL7
LL! w LLJ LIJ Or
O
Crl }-- rT F I--
rj:• Cr rr, ff? I-
r_r T t- U'
Or I- I- Cr rJ+
cr cr- T (P
T (P rf W I-
F-
xU7>: 0-! if;
)J x x3 U
xxrjiU'•,K.
> 0 rj;x y,
U: U-1TTU'1
TA x7: x
x> xxU1
w
W
-
TP.? 0 ;�;F!,!
ht!�PTH
B�OIIt�:
i
Lr=�'�T
r-1
F _ .J I'-;Eb "11-!],,
>-, "� ( P
3._ . !, .EEt`a
rOL
i•1 r"N . P,_.
3E P J
JIl
_ ..F 1
S
---1M11pPY
PEI.J
Oh ,0• /8"
PA10E 3 r1
�=�!1Mr1AP`r TAf'1._E
1 - !=El_.F_CTE�:�
R �lJl_T=
OF
ETAr�C�AR[:�
Af!n E:-<.E!,uT [ �JE
C!-7NTPC!L I
N�TR!.JCT I nrl=,
I "J THE
ORCIE� PERT FIDPIEG
t. A
STAR(*) AFTER
THE
PEAR; D ISC'HAPGE
T I t1E ANDRATE
(. CFS)
VALUES
INDICATES A FLAT TOP
H` DR►-II.�PAPH
A
01IEST I Ora MARK('?)
INDICATES
A H`(DPOGPAPH
41 (TH PEAK
AS LAST POINT.
)
SECT I ON...
STANDARD
RA I H
APJTEC
MA I N
PRECIPITATION
PEAK D I'_ C
HARG E
S,TPI_,I--T1.JP`=
�
;
-------------------------
_
--------------------------------------
I D
OPEPAT I ON
AREA
4
r_:OND
I Pi!.^REM
BEG I N
AMOUNT
DUPAT I ON
AMOUNT
ELEUAT I ON: ,
T I ME
RATE
PATF
(SID MI l
(HP)
(HP)
( IN)
(HP)
( IN)
(FT)
(HP)
(CFS)
(Csr^)
Al TFPhJATc '1. ST1-IRM 1
i
)FCT ION
7 AODF-1`r D
.084
2
2
.10
.0
4. 01)
24.013
1.90
152 .
8 0 . 57
95'-) . 1
:<SECTION
7 REACH
094
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.90
1Ci2.919 1
12.22
80.57
9'^9.0
SECT IOt1
9 AC'()H''rD
251
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.01]
2.07
118,02
12,33
235.71
938.3
STP!JCT!_IPE
3 PE;:,,IJ0P
.251
2
2
.10
.0
G.01)
24.00
2.07
123.76
12.75
101.01
402.:1
Y=EI,TIs1N
1.0 REACH
251
2
2
.10
0
4.00
24.00
2. q:'
102.37
12.8
1111. 01
402.1
> SECT I ON
III RUNCIFF
. 059
2
2
.10
!]
4.00
24.00
1.81
9}3-
1'2. 09
74. 35
1253.8
X'=;EC:TI!ON
10 ADDH","D
.310
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24. 00
2.02
103.01
12. 19
151 .57
488 . 1
e
m
r`..
N
LW
L L1
=J ,T
Ul a-
U
W
f ft
rn
Ion
•1
CA
r,
Ls�
0
0
Ww
X W
C•
C!
F-
w
0
2
<I
S
,D C7 LS+
N LC+ --1 o N
�D U1 `7 r1 •D
C`f r,. OG rl
`D -1 o OD N
OD cill
W.
. . .
. . . . .
F-tn
17tr•o17r'1
n `DO.a..M,
Ltc`t' Ti ISN,
Q1 '1 (r_
O?Zt170DOD
C)r'1
T f U
,n 'D o CO OD
•D = O4. G, 00
OD C`J CJ r,• r\
N `D '•O C7 o
M r1 C,1 N `7
Zt D M --i --1
N1 17
W =
--1 -+ LC Lf, LP,
7 CI n h` •D
r\ 1T• T r"1 n
r•1 N r'1 r1 r1
N CA N CJ o
C7 --1 0 00 [C1
ir, 10
N N C.J Cl N
CA CV N CA N
r4 4 --i N C,t
N CA CA CJ CA
CA N CA N CA
CA N N -4 -1
rI r-i
n
N 1T - Ls, • Li`
n N o In '_0
o m co r} W1.
r1 o Lf, UN U\
--4 o N r',, T,
Lsti --1 r\ o C
e i 14
WUl
oots•',O1C1
NU",
UllooInr1
r',.OLEI' 1717
--sr\ o-DN
NoCVCDm
OD OD
F- LL
. .
Qu
4\t\11717
-1L51•.r1*o`7
Nollm -{-+
-1CAnnrN
I -D ND10\t
� •o001010
NMl
W -
--1 - t
1-4
--1 -4 N
--I
S U I
Q Uj I
,T I
L� 1
0 1 W
ch 4I 1 1:
O W I S
WS I
4 I
it 1
00
_l 1
U- F- I 0
L! F- 1 F-
Q<I
I � U-
11 LL I w
d C I W
W
0 ro
W
w I--
S 2 LL F-
F- L •. LL Z
O _I z
zci z0-•
-
�zz
Ui 0
7 Ln Q
OW I�
1 �1
UQ'S
{- - Lf1 z 1 Z
f R Ln Q 0 1 O
z U- I
U r, �- 1
J W H I Z
0 W Q I O Z
W F-- Q 1 0
F-- CI S I z -
CL 1- U I CI
O - W I
U 03 W I
z Q i
w<IS t _
.mow<I 1 ;!.Q
hZW I 0-r
LLJ �•
0 1 (rJ
w a
XWO
wc-ri:
W S z w W W
Ci 2 - I_ IL S
z S <I 'I - U ..
a U Z F- z
fp Ln ..-,
0 - W
W O F- u
<11 'I W Ui O
0 Y U F- -Z
Z<I- z00
S W O a z u
�- d z
Ln ,.-1
w z W
Li- 2- -J
O F- - IT W x
I-
F- W W
� � S
LL z W
W CI f �]
W z <I <I
Wr-•0 zWz
>Y �
O F- <I Q O
LLI W fJ) W fn
F- <E W O
U F- =1
LL1fn0
_1 z
w a a f_JJO
tf.1 W C, ,_..
T W F-
1
-1 I O w
F- U Q
W U1 f.;'1
J
cri
F- w
Q
ii D
W O F-
<I �UC�
U W
W F-
Ln ffi Ui
1 1 le r1. r1.
r... Lf- CA N ,D
M: --+ :--1 00 0?
OD 'S O_1 1h O_,
D Cn -4 --1 -1
4 --4 ID CK CR
0- O%
--' -"1 fT fj', O
Q,o r --1 Oti
CD Q r-4
C7 U, T all C7
a- O•, =t --i e-I
C'J C1 C7 O, O
CD o
CAN-+-MCA
--+NCJN--f
CJCJCA
N-+-+-+N
-1ri NNN
NNN-1CV
Nc:
r-1 -4 -4 --1 --4
e-1 --t --1 14 1-1
11 -i r-i --4 r1
-4 -1 rl -i e-•1
-•1 -•-1 --1 r-1 --i
--1 --1 1-1 11 r-i
--1 e-1
I I
CPcc[ c'if Lf%
1 1
C;,170ofr1
1
r',N17CP,D
i
\7 CUCDLC. Zt
I
Cr, Cn00rl(IN
I I
10cri14CPLf%
1
CpM
CP LC+ Cp LC+ --+
. . . . .
C I CD o Lill Cp
.
00 C7 o Cp ,rj
a, CR -A --1 00
Cy -0 ID r-1 ID
UN CA � CA LC+
CJ; N
.
Ci. --1. r',..
N. fxti. N. . N
.
. . . . .
,D n. Q. Lrl
. . . . .
CJ N OD C1
. . . . .
T N UN
. .
LS
131 Cn. rli
0-1 w OD OD
m cn on a
m cn N m
1-4 tit W.
Ull
- 4 --1 1-1
---1 .-1 14
11 1--1 1-4 -4
-I r-i -a 4
--1 - 4 --1 -4
4
r'-1Ft, Lo-4 C:l`-D 4-4r\, -4•7 rl--1CA noLc•Mo tli 01'-It NC* NnNN -1 0-1 -4
00 OD LfN `D ID OD ID n--1 OD C' 0=1 w Go 0-1 N T 00 -{ r `, CD O0 CD a', CD Or- CO OD - -N 4 -1 N
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CJNNNN NNNM,N nNNNN CINNr1N r'1Nr1CA N CIA NNNN NN
o Cl Cl o CD
p C1 C o C+
CD CD r, p o
o C• CD o C.
c� CD o G o
o O C7 0 o
O C1
O CJ CD C CD
O C. 0 0 C)
co Cp O O CD
O Ck CD C_t O
C_1 CD Co CD G
O CD O CD CD
C) O
Zt `7 17 `7 17
17 'd 17 `7 4
17 7 17 14 '7
`7 17 '7 \7 `7
Zt `t
17
NNNC`JN
CIA NNCJCA
CANell NCJ
NNNCIA N
CACACJNN
NNNNCJ
NN
o O C: o In
r, C. rr o C,
- C, C, C+ r,
Cl O o C• r,
CD C] C• p C.
C, p p C, r
C, CD
CD O CD C Ca
o o CD C7 In
O D _
p C7 CD O O
O p •= C, CD
C O C) Cl C,
O O
17 It `7 Zt Zt
\t ,,i. ...f `7
,7 `7 7 `7 ?
`T 7 4 4 4
1 .,y '•,t ,7..,7
.7 ,7 `.I `- `7
,7 17
C• ;-n = O ^ C1 =1 C• 1= = C. t_I 1= 1=1 1= .__ r', = _ - :D _ ! r, _ =1 C7 C O C, C7
17-1 r-, C, ,_. i=l Cl Cl ZD _ ,C p C, r, p C, p CD ,= rr C, ,= p C, o CD C, C, C,
---1 --i -1 - ;-I -1 ---i --1 -! --1 --i •-� -1 -i ---1 c-i --i -1 ---4 �4 7--1 --1 --4 --1 --1 e-1 .-t -i --i
r•J NC.IC',; r•t CV CANCAC,I NNNNN CACANNN NCIA NCACJ CIA CdCJC ell CA CA
NCIA CJC•JC`.1 C-1 C"ICJCAC41 CIA CIA NNN CA11JN CA CIA NC,; NC,JN NNNNN CAN
r\NCIA CIA N--1M;01,nN 171717-+--+--1-1NNN CA v tK)r1N NN.17M,M LC+OD
O CD O O ^ C, p o C, c: o r_t C, o C, p o f_-, Ct C, rn o O C. CD O C7 --I C7 CD o C7
p CO CD 0 0 O O o o C] C7 O Q C1 CD C.) C1 o= C7 C') CD d o C, Q CD CD O G Cr CD
. . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LL LL Ll_
LL U W LL
v CL LL W
LL 0 W
LL. L.J IY Ci
LL. U U-
U- O
LL T LL O S
II >- 0 M LL
}- D S LL O
S LL >- O S
11 >- O S >-
S LL ?- LL S
LL ?-
OLIOD U
OTD UO
SDUOD
UOS=>U
OS DU1=
UOSOU
OS
zQZWC
zOLn<Tz
QW-ITZW
<170w l
Zowco
2zOza
zO
O W O W W
O O W W O
O W W D W
w= d w w
O O W W O
W O O O W
Do
W W W W IL
Q. <I II. W. O
r a. a w w
w w e w w
W rI W Q <I
W W c w w
+Y Q
C'N
CI CACdCC, tell
rl1f11D, •r1tit
Cw ullT -4
17 ZI17 CwM,
OOCANM17
17\t
N t*1 r, to
r', tw r1 n r1
rl, n rn r1 to
17 r1 to r1 1q
n n Pn 7 4
w Ww
WwW w
ww Ww
w w w
wWw w
Wzwa_z
11cha zCt
WaZ W W
zW W Wz
W W W zW
z z z z z
zz
DO_i_10
_DD-10_,
=_IO--I
ODD zt0
DDDO=t
00000
00
F- - F- F- '-'
F- F- P ,-, L--
�- F_ ..-. F- F
. F- i t -.
t..- F- F- -, F-
.-. .-+ ,-+ ,.-, f-.
.-+ .-,
L 1 F-- U, LY F-
U U W - U
U1 U F- U
i- U U U i-
L1 u U L- UF-
OU==1U
DDDUJ
0=1U=10
U000U1
`1_t'1UD
UUUUU
UU
W W W CL w
W W W W W
W W w W W
w W W W w
W W W w W
W W w W W
w W
F- w F- F- T
1- !- F- w F--
F- F- Ln F- F-
Ln F- F- F- Cri
F- F- F- f1.1 F-
Ul Co Ln to Ln
Ln Cn
Ulxmmx
TI ifjixw
MTIX WUI
XWWTJX
Uiwvixw
XXXXX
XX
WOO
TR20 XEQ
REV 05. n2 -83,
NORTH BROOk` LAST REU I SED 11- 08-88 ( GREEN MTN . POWER)
SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED
(A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK. DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH
A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK: AS LAST POINT.)
JOB 1 SUMMARY
PAGE 28
SECTION
STANDARD
RAIN
ANTEC
MAIN
PRECIPITATION
PEAK:
DISCHARGE
STRUCTURE
CONTROL
DRAINAGE
TABLE
MOIST
TIME
------------------
-------
RUNOFF
--------------------------------------
IG
OPERATION
AREA
4
COhdD
INCREM
BEGIN
AMOUNT
DURATION
AMOUMT
ELEVATION'
TIME
RATE
RATE
(SQ MI)
(HR)
(HR)
(IN)
(HR)
(IN)
(FT)
(HR)
(CFS)
(CSr1)
ALTERNATE
:1 STORM 1
XSECTION
5
REACH
.008
2
2
10
.9
4.00
24.00
2.22
145.73
12.19
13.81
1643.9
XSECTION
2
ADDHYD
.022
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.59
147.51
12.10
38.82
1741.0
XSECTIOPJ
1
RUNOFF
.039
2
2
10
i;
4.00
24.00
1.96
.88-
12. 15
44.53
1141.9
`;SECTION
5
REACH
.039
2
2
.11-i
.0
4.00
24.011
1.96
146.20
12.25
44.53
1141.9
XSECTION
5
ADDHYD
.061
?
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.19
146.51
12.18
75.89
1238.1
STRUCTURE
8
RUNOFF
.005
2
2
.10
,0
4.00
24.00
1.36
,AA-
11.97
7.20
1.440.3
STRUCTURE
8
RESOOR
.005
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.39
175.71
12.13
1.98
396,E
XSECTION
13
REACH
.005
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.39
172.32
12.23
1.9.9
396.4
XSECTION
46
RUNOFF
.002
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
.73
,Q8-
12.10
1.04
474.3
XSECTION
46
RUNOFF
.003
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
.66
.88-
12.04
1.25
453.5
XSECTION
46
ADDHYD
.005
2
2
.10
0
4.00
24.00
.69
189.49
12.05
2.35
473.9
XSEC:TION
44
RUNOFF
.001
2
2
.10
.0
4,00
24. 00
2.80
..99-
11.97
2.99
2474.9
:;SE!^TION
44
ADDHYD
.006
2
.10
1
4.00
24.00
1.11
173.91
12.00
5.10
828.1
XSECTION
44
RUNOFF
.005
2
2
.10
0
4.00
24.00
3.17
.89-
11.96
13.97
2851.1
XSECTION
44
ADDHYD
.011
?
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.02
182.94
11.97
18.82
1702.0
}'SECTION
45
RUNOFF
.001
2
2
.10
0
4.00
24.00
2.78
,89-
11.96
2.29
2657.4
XSECTION
45
REACH
.001
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.88
130.10
12.06
2.28
2656.3
XSECTION
44
ADDHYD
.012
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24,00
2,08
183.99
11.97
20.68
1735.1
XSECTION
46
RUNOFF
.002
2
.10
0
4.00
24.00
1.78
.88-
11..96
3.89
1853.2
XSECTION
6
REACH
.002
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.86
190.99
12.06
3.89
1852.9
XSECT I ON
44
ADC'HYD
.014
2
2
.10
11
4.00
24.00
2. 05
185.66
11, 98
23.64
1686.1
XSECTION
47
RUNOFF
.003
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
.70
.88-
12.00
1.97
579.7
XSECTION
44
ADDHYD
.017
2
2
.10
0
4.00
24.00
1.79
186.75
11.98
25,57
1467.8
XSECTION
44
RUNOFF
.001
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.59
.QQ-
11.96
2.11
2422.9 -
XSECTION
44
ADDHYD
.018
2
2
.10
.13
4.00
24.00
1.82
197.93
11.98
27.66
1512.1
XSECTION
44
REACH
.018
2
.10
.0
4,00
24.00
1.84
187.93
12.08
27.66
1512.1
Y;SECTION
5
RUNOFF
.017
?
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
.67
.430-
12.07
7.31
435.2
STRUCTURE
7
ADDHYD
,023
2
2
.10
11
4.00
24.00
1.74
170.07
12.08
29.54
1268.3
STRUCTURE
7
RUNOFF
.020
2
.10
.11
4.0IJ
24.00
2.42
.88-
11.96
45.45
2295.4
STRUCTURE
7
ADDHYD
.043
2
?
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.06
189.04
11.99
67.47
1565.8
STRUCTURE
7
ADDHYD
,060
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.67
192.19
12.00
73.79
1232.0 -.
STRUCTURE
?
RESUOR
.060
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24,00
1.67
168.34
12.23
26.08
435.5
XSECTION
12
ADDHYD
,121
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.93
164.32
12.18
101,90
840.8
XSECTION
8
REACH
.121
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
1.93
121.05
12.28
101.90
840.8
XSECTION
8
RUNOFF
.039
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.73
.88-
12.22
51.65
1331.2
XSECTION
8
ADDHYD
.160
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2.13
121.82
12.26
152.21
951.4 Y -
IS
E
TR'2 0 XEO
REV 05/0.2/83
NORTH BROOK LAST REVISED 11-08-88 (GREEN MTN. POWER)
.JOB 1 SUMMARY
PAGE 29
SUMMARY TABLE
1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF
STANDARD AND EXECUTIOE
CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS
IN THE ORDER PERFORMED
(A
STAR(*) AFTER THE
PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES
INDICATES A FLAT TOP
HYDROGRAPH
A
QUESTION MARK(?)
INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH
WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.)
SECTION/
STANDARD
RAIN
PNTEC MAIN
PRECIPITATION
PEAK DISCHARGE
STRUCTURE
CONTROL
DRAINAGE TABLE
MOIST TIME -------------------------
RUNOFF --------------------------------------
ID
OPERATION
AREA 4
COND INCREM BEGIN
AMOUNT DURATION
AMOUNT ELEVATION
TIME RATE RATE
(Sid MI)
(HR) (HR)
(IN) (HR)
(IN) (FT)
(HR) (CFS) (CSM)
ALTERNATE
1 STORM
1
XSECTION
8
ADDHYD
.167 2
STRUCTURE
2
RESUOR
.167 2
XSECTION
9
REACH
.167 2
STRUCTURE
13
RUNOFF
.004 2
STRUCTURE
13
RESVOR
.004 2
XSECTION
6
RUNOFF
XSECT I ON
6
ADDHYD
XSECTION
6
RUNOFF
XSECTION
6
ADDHYD
STRUCTURE
14
RUNOFF
XSECTION
6
ADDHYD
XSECTION
6
REACH
STRUCTURE
5
RUNOFF
STRICTURE
5
RESVOR
XSECTION
7
RUNOFF
XSECTION
7
ADDHYD
STRUCTURE
4
ADDHYD
STRUCTURE
4
RESVOR
XSECTION
7
RUNOFF
XSECTION
7
ADDHYD
STRUCTURE
11
RUNOFF
STRUCTURE
11
RUNOFF
STRUCTURE
11
ADDHYD
STRUCTURE
11
RESVOR
STRUCTURE
12
RUNOFF
STRUCTURE
12
RESVOR
XSECTION
14
ADDHYD
XSECTION
14
RUNOFF
XSECTION
14
ADDHYD
XSECTION
7
REACH
.011 2
.015 2
.025 2
.039 2
.005 2
.044 2
.044 2
.004 2
.004 2
.011 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
.0.15
2 2
.060
2 2
.060
2 2
.006
2 2
.066
2 2
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
10
.10
.10
.10
.004
2
2 .10
.001
2
2 10
.004
2
2 .10
.004
2
2 .10
.001
2
2 .10
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4. 00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
.001
2
2
.10
. 0 4. 00
.005
2
2
.10
0 4.00
.001
2
2
.10
.0 4.00
.007
2
2
.10
0 4.00
.007
2
2
10
0 4.00
XSECTION
7
RUNOFF
.010
2
2
.10
XSECTION
7
ADDHYD
.016
2
2
.10
XSECTION
7
ADDHYD
.082
2
2
.10
XSECTION
7
REACH
.082
2
2
.10
STRUCTURE
10
RUNOFF
.002
2
2
.10
STRUCTURE
10
RESVOR.
.002
2
2
.10
24.00
2.16
122.05
24.00
2.16
124.48
24.00
2.16
117.36
24.00
.49
.AA-
24.00
.50
209.10
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24. 00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
1.14
.95
1.66
1.39
.61
1,31
1.31
2.93
2.84
3.33
3.20
1.80
1.81
3.28
1.95
.AA-
149.28
.AA-
157. 20
.AA-
157. 91
157.91
.8A-
169.25
.AA-
149.51
152.10
152.10
.AA-
151.97
12.25
166.59
996.4
12.25
166.83
997.9
12.35
166.83
997.9
11.99
2.05
469.0
12.20
.39
88.0
12.11
7.58
722.3
12.11
7.97
535.7
12.11
26.53
1078.4
12.11
34.50
873.8
12.Q
1,84
383,3 GIMP
12.11
36.28
819 . 3 GIN
12.21
36.29
819.3 p2wv
12.00
8.86
2272.3
12.06
7.50
1923.1
11.99
30.19
2625.6
11.99
37.26
2419.2
12.09
54.72
916.9
12.10
55.13
923.8
11.95
18.88
2950.7
12.01
68.68
1039.4
.70
AA-
11.98
2.67
712.5
3.10
.AA-
11.95
1.72
2890.2
1.03
181.94
11.97
4.35
1001.5
1.06
178.35
12.12
1.48
340.0
2.59
.AA-
11.96
2.46
2525.0
4.83
176.50
.00
6.70
6871.8
1.75
166.60
.00
6.70
1259.4
3.03
.AA-
11.95
3.39
2852.9
1.93
166.60
.00
6.70
1029.2
2.14
148.18
.12
6.95
1066.8
.0
4.00
24.00
1.27
.AA-
12.21
6.01
632.'?
.0
4. 00
24.00
1.62
148.42
12 . '11
11.20
699.8
.0
4.00
24.00
1.89
152.74
12.02
77.68
946.
.0
4.00
24.00
1.88
152.74
12.12
77.68
946.3
(L.;f.�'
.0
4.00
24.00
3.04
AA-
11.96
5.30
2759.9
.0
4.00
24.00
3.07
147.11
12.05
3.44
1789:3
i
TR20 XEO NORTH BROOK LAST REVISED 11-08-88 (GREEN MTN. POWER)
REV 05/02/83
JOB 1 SUMMARY
PAGE 30
SUMMARY TABLE
1 - SELECTED RESULTS
OF
STANDARD
AND EXECUTIOE
CONTROL
INSTRUCTIONS
IN THE
ORDER PERFORMED
(A
STpR(*) AFTER
THE
PEAK DISCHARGE
TIME AND
RATE (CFS) VALUES
INDICATES A FLAT TOP
HYOROGRAPH
A
QUESTION MARK(?)
INDICATES
A HYOROGRAPH
WITH PEAK
AS LAST POINT.)
SECTION/
STANDARD
RAIN
ANTEC
MAIN
PRECIPITATION
PEAK
DISCHARGE
STRUCTURE
CONTROL
DRAINAGE TABLE
MOIST
TIME
-------------------------
RUNOFF
-------------------------------------_
lO
OPERATION
AREA
#
CONO
lNCREM
BEGIN
AMOUNT
DURATION
AMOUNT
ELEUATlON
TIME
RATE
RATE
(So y1[)
(HR)
(HP)
(IN)
(HR)
({N)
(FT)
(HP)
(CFS)
(CSM)
ALTERNATE
1 STORM 1
XSECTlON
7
ADOHYD
.084
2
2
.10
.O
4.00
24.00
1.91
153.03
12.12
80.96
963.6
XSECTlON
7
REACH
'084
2
2
'10
'O
4.00
24.00
1'91
153'03
12'22
80'96
963.6
KSECTlON
9
AODHYD
.251
2
2
,10
'O
4.00
24'00
2'08
118'02
12.33
236.45
941.3
STRUCTURE
3
RESVOR
'251
2
2
.10
'O
4.00
24,00
2.08
123'80
12.75
101'01
402.1
KSECT[ON
10
REACH
.251
2
2
.10
.0
4'00
24.00
2'08
102.37
12.84
101.01
402.1
XSECT[ON
10
RUNOFF
'059
2
2
'10
.0
4.00
24'00
1.81
.AA-
12,09
74'35
1253'8
}<SECT[ON
10
ADDHYD
.310
2
2
.lO
.O
4.00
24.00
2.03
103.01
12.19
151.57
488,2
�,
E
TP'. !'i .'--!
F;rI aT!-1 R�?!_tt]1;` L;-1 �'r R'= t.J [' F C? 11- 02 -8:? (G.PEIFN r; T-N .
Pis ► c� E,v � «✓
� P �r=n� �'
�;� 1-� � _,
'=:' 1MMAP`r TARI-F
1 - '?c I__FI,TE
rj
-C�hC
jF-Y
?
"-IL
==1
_=11 =?MEC
aF
rayt47 AFTER
T:-IE
PEAK CY
'Ha-s;E
TI ' E
lCCRATE tT"E57
4?aL_IF'
.S
A�LAT1710
Fr?�G'-i=
A
1.1!= ST f Or!
MaRt f 7 y
T hJi [ [:ATF'
A H'r'r?r•?I'!!
PAPH
WITH PEA
A' LW,T
P13 i NT . i
- - I,T ? nh1.
-TACJC'+R!
Y
f?%+ I N
At1TEC
C1N T N
[' I Tf:4T
PPS C �'
1 h
I 7 !
P� -
_AK, C: I _+!_.Hr
��
ERG -
•TP!,!F:Tt.IPF
I7,r]hJTRI-11.
n- PAINal;E
TAP!._F
MF!1 7
TIME.
-------------------------
P!-It;C!FF
--------------------------------------
T I '
nPFCPAT
I MA
APt^ A
4k
171-iC'1Cy
I NCPcM
RI- ' M
i
f^' ! !td-T
r=1 ,� _
T !-t�!
C�URA , I
I r
t-1l11-I! r!
cI F+ l�� r T nt•1
T 1 IME
PA '
c H� c
i1;171 M[l
�HRI
(HIP
r.Ir1,
CHl ,
(It'll,
cFr)
(Hod
ri'FF,?
r.r'F,C?t
lrTPP-jP,TF
.I C,TnPr! !
•TP'_!I--TIJQF.
2"
0117
?
10
0
4.0I]
24,00
2,8 3
0-
1= ',,IJ'1
14.!]'
^ F I T I ON
2
1=' I= A r H
0 0 :7
2
2
11)
0
4,00
24. On
2 .. 81.
1. 46, 5 113
1?. '1 '1
'14 , 0 P!
='rPI If:T'_IPF
3 !
1312
2
2
10
0
4. 00
24, 0!1
5'�
+]�-
11 ��
4. EF.!-I
•�h!111. F,
c'rA1 !f:TI IRE31
oFc ;t„?P
11 rl :?
?
. q 11
!]
!+ .
2 a . !1
� .
4 F,�
I '! q .
-
� ,!� 11
TI!-IN
37
}7FH
001?
2
2
�Ln
0
L, 00
24, 01)
'� h�I-
�.1 1. ''�•� �
�.'} n'-'
i G.�
-74. rJ {
L' rR! !I-T! IRF
3'?
PI !Ni-?!= F
001
2
2
to
n
4. Oil
2 4. 0 rt
2 . 80
T t! P F
z,
A C! �! H `;'ri
, Il 1] 3
7
7
1. I]
n
4. n T]
G 4 n rl
L '`
.1 'd 0,J
1 L Il7•
_
'� F.. F
_..
= r41 !! T'.!1=F
3''.
P.I==t_!!:IP
1! 113
?
2
1 n
. Il
4 , 0 !'
? . 0 !7
a, 3 �
�,�!=!-•TT!`lt..!
3'?
P1_AC'.L!
ri!t�
='
1'1
!1
=+.nn
2=+.0!7
_ .11
1'??.�!�
1'�.1'`
l
�.
'rP!.!I-TIIPF
3=
P!..!ti.;E-1FF
11!'1?_
2
?
11l
n
`+, nn
2�+. I]!]
e�. ��
t!t _
11 u
n
^TR!.!I--r!_!r,c
37,
ar,!-„H.'•-',
004
2
?
In
,
4. 0 r)
24. n!]
3. ."
1„� '?�'
'
c 1'p! IDC'
!!' T I-
7 3
.
C'c, If
�' _.._, .. _:!!?
t i
n 0 -+
2
��
_
l n
n
it
4 , n ,,
2 r.. 0 0
•?
1.8 _
O,- •-i
1 n
1 •7 •I
,`
F!-•TT
39
PcAr-4
0i]4
2
L
'
10
n
'.00
2',0!'
',S�
L
11�2.I]ci
1.'?.1"1
rP!.I!'Tl!Pf
3r.
o!.°t,nF!=
!ls]1
'
2
10
0
4. ii0
2,. n!]
2. 'I.
Ala-
1 '1 ;3
'L Z `'
_-rPU1` TI;917
3r.
Rc':�t?I-?R
!]n'1
2
�'
. 10
n
4, 00
24. 00
? • 82
1.97. of
I "[ .9'?
;. x?
r',
r!-N
4!?
REACH
On '1
'?
?
.10
0
4, Oil
24,00
2,76,
1:3:;,9Z.
1'?,!1!3
1..37
•2=74,
r1 !-II^Tl!RI=
3E;
RI N0F!
n0.1
2
2
111
0
4, nn
24, n0
2,911
-AA-
11..9r
2. !:!
�, •,
c-rP!_I':'T! IRF
3F
AID I",HY0
, n n'2
2
2
10
']
" O l]
24,011
2. 8G
11.�9 . 18
11.. 99
__ , 5,::
236 . 9
c.rP!_CT1.PF
3F
RE' !.!nR
.1102
2
1!]
n
4. 00
24. 00
3 . 17
189. 11F
'11 .91?
_,.
�FI"TI!lPs
-1
REACH
00'2
?
2
10
0
=�.On
2-.0!,
? 71l
1'35.U4
1''.0!'
z
cro!I!-
!�
2
in
i]
4. Oil
24.011
?.0!?
+]Q-
11."
0
c'r41_ICTIIPF.
3-
A!!!lH'Yri
nn3
2
1n
!]
u_n1]
4, ]r
1.13'<.F_,13
1'1,?0
TR!!1_:TI!RF
34
PF' !J!-IR
ii!13
2
;'
Ln
it
4. !]I
2 4, n!]
z i
3. 0
1- : 2, 6 3 i
! ?, 1, i
�•,• ,
`<ccl'TI'lN
4''
PFAf7H
nI]3
2
11]
rj
!. nn
24,IJI]
2,97,
17�,17
`2.1'1
6.r<,
��''',
t _.._
cr}.!!rTI_!Rc
43
uC!!-'H`.r.n
n1717
2
7
10
0
4,01)
24. IJn
? �'�
?!1 . <,�?
1 _
1 1.1
14 . 7w.
. ,. 4l-. 6
Y FI-T11-]N
0,
P-A!7-H
nn?
2
2
10
n
4.n0
24.01]
2,g^_
119,56
12..21
14.75
121)41=,.6
=F I-' T I ON
2
P!_!N CIF F
. 007
?
Z
. 11]
0
4.00
24, n C.
ra A -
_
12 . ' ! '1
1�+. l
n
?1hi -� . ?.
`:3Fl TI!7h1
2
ACtE?H`r!-)
n'14
2
2
10
n
4,00
24.01]
^.8
1'i7.11
12,0e�
213.2'
2034.1]
":�F! TIC!"!
3
41_!NI'FF
003
2
?
10
!]
4.0n
24.01-1
2.12
8-
I T . 99
6.00
1`?'t13.8
I13N
4
REAI:H
nn3
?
'2
1n
0
4.00
24:00
2.1'1
155,G5
!_'?.0
F,, 0111
131!3.7
`!SFCTT!-1r1
4
P!.-!.NnFF
n!J5
2
2
.10
0
4.00
24,011
2.20
.4-9-
1.2.119
:'.81
1530.0
�<' IECT I !-�N
4
ADnHYCI
0118
2
?
, 111
0
4 , n n
24,00
2 , 21
1.55 . 73
'12 . 09
'13 . 81
3
1b�+� . 9
-�L-6
rw
M-IPTH PPI7,101K !-A'=.T (F."PEEN MTH, P!-I.!AIEP)
pal ;p 2 1R.
l=IJr,'r1APY TOP.!-.E
I - (FFI-.Er-.TFn
OF
STANI-)ARD
W11-j P!EDITIUE
CI-111TP01-
JN -UHF rjpr)FQ, Pl:'PFf-Q!1'fEn
fA
STAPr*) AFTER THE
p1c-Ap, n1SCHAP".-_E
TIME ArID
RATE (CFS)
IJALIJES
INDII-PITIES.
A FLAT T!-"P
A
I-DI-IFSTTON MP4PK(*?)
flJrIICATFA HYf'R0,'PAPH
I.d[TH PF'--AK
AP LAST Rf
I r
T!-1r4,,
ISTANC)ppr)
PA It N
ANTFC
MAT N
Ppqc I p I TAT
1 ON
D I S1-P-.,PC.F
,::Z T P!.! f- T I _I P PF
ORA I NAGIF
TAFLE
Mil I ST
T f, M F
------
-------------------
R!jNI'3F
--------------------------------------
T n
nPFRAT
I ON
PREP
1b
c OhJf1
1 N117PEM
REG! N
A 1`1 f7I 11 NT
OUPAT I ON
AMOUNT
FLIFUAT T!-IN
T1 ME
PATF
PATE
.
sn m,,
(HP)
(HP)
IN
(HP)
c IN I
(FTl
( HP I
C. 1:* S,
I
(;Tnpm
F f- T I C
PFA(-.I-.
0 9 1?.
2
2
-1 n
.11
01)
24,011
2 22
14,15.73
1 -:1
9
T ION
7
ADCHYD
0,212
.10
.0
4,01)
24,011
1
12 1 f!,
3R , .�12
1741
0
�.'-3F
.CT I ON
I
01. -INCIFP'
1139
4,
2
.10
4,01-1
-
24. On
1 96
1 1.
q, 3
1 141..
9
VFi-T T
q
PEACH
.0139
el
2
'10
0
4,1)11
2-;! - 0 11
1 qm,
1,4 6
I
i 4-4, L;
,Ef7T r, 1
A 0 OH'- D.
.1161
2
2
.10
0
4,00
24,011
2 19
46. r�
12
C5. . P, L�
c:,rp!!i-THPF
9
P!, 1r101717
OO5
2
2
0
r
4. 01)
24. 0!'
1 3
.43-0-
11 9?
14 11
3
rp! i! ,Tl-.IPF
P.
PF:;1,.'!-1P
n -�,
n
1)
r.
2
.10
0
4,011
24,011
1 -Z. a
'75 , ?I
1 .-), I .
I Q:?
3 9 t.,
-it
'2
4, no
2 4. 0!)
1 3-�
2 3 21
1`2 '2 %5
1 9!-�
3 96
• c! 7 T f
R U N 1
2
2
In
n
4,011
24,011
04
474.3
,-"_FCT f
PlflNJOFP
.003
2
In
0
4. 0 C!
24. on
66
1) 4
1 . 2:7,
4C5 3
,
ON
ZL-.
Ar.)PL ./n
.H"
.
2
2
.10
0
4, 113 11
24, V
A -.;s
l;39. 49
12. Or-�
2 35
/-?3
9
Yllzl!=CT 19N
ea 4
PLft.j0Fc
.11111
2
2
.10
0
4, I) I!
24. 0 1!
2 8
.444-
11. P7
-2 . 9'z'-
9
I I -IN
44
ADDHYD
61
2
1 n
n
a, nn
24 - 0 0
1 .11
173 q I
10 0
Y'-Z,Ff7T 1 ON
e:1 4'
011111OFF7
0135
2
2
4.01)
24-011
3, 17
A 4.-
11
1
F!-T T117)N
4 Zi
Anr)HYr'
0*11
2.
?
10
.0
4, On
2 4 , 0 11
0 12
1"--j 2 9 4
I't . 97,
8
P7 C T 1. 0 N
4c;
P1INOF17
.001
'2
2
.0
4, nn
24,011
2 7P.
Ao-
11.96
2 2'-?
2
"<':;F!-T f ON
4G5
PFAF'H
.001
2
Z
1i1
0
4. 01)
24.00
8..D
180 In
12 . On
2 .28
265t5.
3
44
An-OHYD
01- 2
4. On
24.00
Oiz.!
1.93.99
11,97
2- 0 . 6 9
1735.
1.
`47--F[7T f i�N
P!Jh41:)FP"
0 0 2,
2
2
10
0
4, 013
24,011
1.78
443-
Ill . 9A
3.89
1 cj 5 3
'-2
l:-F,F-T ! OH
46
PEACH
002
2
2
0
4. 00
24. 0 1"'
1.86,
119 il , 99
ll? . 06
3 ell?
1252
9
�.SFI-'T T I-3N
44.
A, D 0 H Y rl
014/
2
2
.0
4. 0 n
2 A 0 13
0 05
I '-� 5 . 66
11, . 98
f�4
162.6
1
Y1:2IF!-T P-IN
4-2
PUNrIFF7
On3
0
2
In
.0
4.01)
24, On
7
19 Iq -
1,1 . 0
1.97
q-179
.
Y C" F!- T 10 N
44
ADDHYD
.017
2
2
In
0
4.011
24. 00
1 . 79
126 7q
11 . 98
15 . q- 7
14.6 7,
XSFI--T f ON
44
PUNOPF
.001
2
2
0
.0
4. 00
24.011
12 . 159
QQ-
11 . 9.6
2. 11
12
, 9
lt,�SEC-r I ON
44
ADDHYD
nie
2
2
1)
.0
4, 00
2zi. 00
1181,
.'17.93
Ill
11.9 .13
2 7. 66
1 C5 Ile-,
. I
Y'-FCTMM
44
PEACH
niq
?
2
0
4, 013
24. 00
1.84
1:?7, 93
12 , 02-
?7. 6 rJ
'/,OF'CT I ON
5
PLIF40FF
.017
'2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.011
.67
-po-
12. 0?
7.31
435
2
IFTPIJr-TI.JPE
7
ADCWn
.023
2
10
0
4,00
24. 00
1.74
17n. o 7
12. OR,
29.54
1262
. 3
C TRUCTURE
7
RUNOFF
.1)213
2
2
10
0
4.01)
24.00
2.42
* .4343-
11.96
45.45
2295.4
C. r P I j r- T 1.11 P E
7
ADnHYn
043
2
1.13
0
4.00
24. On
2. 06
189.04
11. . 99
617.47
V56 5
. 8
,F. rPIJCTIJRC-
7
ADnHYCI
060
2
2
.113
4,00
24.0e.
1,67,
192.19
12.00
73.79
1232.0
IF,TPtJCTIJP-C
7
RESWOP
0610
2
2
.10
p
4.00
24,01)
1.6?
168.34
12.23
26.08
435
. 5
`!SECTION
12
ADDHYD
.121
2
2
.0
4.00
24-00
1.93
1'.,4.32
12.19
101.90
840.8
XSECT I IDN
8
PEACH
? 1
2
2
.0
4.00
24.00
1.93
1 'I.OF
12.28
1 I'll 1 . 901
840.8
YSECT I ON
8
RUNOFF
�1139
2
2
.10
.0
4.00
24.00
2,73
.43.9-
12.22
51.65
1331.2
. -1 1
-
---, .-
,I
�
I ")
n
A nn
')A nn
0 1 'X
1 0
1) .11
a C-1 I
-L71
TP'il '-'E-0
l,jop,rH BROOV L-AqT PP)ISED 11-0!'-201 (GREEH MTN. PIJ11AIEF"'I
C"IMMAPY T�)Rll DL INSTRUCTIONS P-1 THE CIPOER Pl-'PF"
-E LSFLECTEI�� P!z'k7n T':; i:)F STAW-)APD AND EXECITTIUE
CONTPI
(A STAR(-) AFTER THE PFAK D T SCHAP!-,E T I 1"IE At-4D RATE (CFS) 0ALUES A FLAT T!- .. IP HYDPCIGP;' PH
A 01 lEr PFAK AS L T PI T
- ;T[ON MARK(?) INO[l ATES A HYDPIDIP',�PH, 1,01TH 0 1 N
'--FrT TON/ PAIN ANTEC MA T to PRE-C 1 P I TAT ION
P A I 'Ill A 1-1 F TAe,'-.E MO(ST T (ME ------------------------- PI. 11OFF
D :�PFPF,,;T I!-!1-1 AREA Ilt CONID I NI-IRF.11 R-IEG .1 N AMOI-INT DURATION AMIOUHT
(Sr, MI ) (HP) (pp) ( I IN) (Hol ) ( IN)
A! TFPt-IATF
T Cl P M
F C. T f 0 N
2
A.-!nHyn
.167
rP1-lCT1-lpW1
2
P 51: t=• u f- P
.167
T I i*) H
9
P F A. F H
167
c'rP! IC
-TURE
13
RUNCIF;:'
004
C3TP!-lC,TljPE
1 z
RES�JOP
.1104
-- F 17 T f 0 N'
- 7) _
6
RUNOFF
-
. p I I
""'Fl-T I ON
6
Ar )r.iWen
3 FCT I ON
6.
.025
Y.r-'.FI-T PIN
6
A 0 0 H',' In
039
T r
Af. t 0 H Y D
1344
w'Z,17CT P.71N
6
REACH
.044
cZTP! 11-TURF
cr.
pl-flncp
.004
T 10 N
7
P! 1H0FP
n,t 1
2 2
10
0
1) 2
.10
0
2 12
.113
0
2 2
10
0
2 2
. 10
1)
2
.10
0
2 2
10
0
2 2
10
0
2 '2
.10
2 2
. 11)
11
12 2
.10
0
1-1 1. 2
.10
0
2 2
.10
0
2 2
.113
0
2 2
.10
0
C I-T r I-- t,j
7
A100HYD
01
2
T P! .1 f7- T! RE
:I
AnrlHyC)
I
o6n
2 2
r-7 TQ I.) f-
.
4.
P F C, �.J' 0 P
n , o
2 *2
F C, T 10t.1
7
PI-INOFI=
.006
2 2
,I --=FCT -
7
ACirHYD
0 6, r,
2 2
cTR!
1
R! !NOFP
n 1)4
2
c'rP! ICTI IQ!z
11
PUNOFF
n n
S. rP!JCTl-!PF
1 '1
A D D H
n114
2 2
1--:TPHC.TljPF
-
II
L
RPSUOR
-
J
e)
2
r7TPI,lf7,T,!PF
1'2
PUt-inFP'
'001
2 2
c T P! !!7 T Ij P!z-
1.
PC71;Vr-lp
001
2 2
-;F!-'T 1
14
A �' 0 H Ile D
0115
2 2
YSql-T 11-3N
'14
PLINOFP-
0 13 1
2 2
�,!=,ECT I ON
14
ADC HYD
007
2
XcECT I Or!
7
RE A(--H
.0137
2 2
1/93ECT I ON
7
Rt-INOFF
'010
2 2
"SECT 1 lH
7
A D D H Y D
.016
2 2
''SECTION
7
ADnHYD
0!?2
2 2
'-4'--FCT I ON
7
1,
EACH 0
082
2 2
STRUCTUPF"
In
RUNOFF
.0132
2 2
CZTPI ICTI IPF
1 n
PF(-;k)OP
. 1302
2 2
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
10
0
0
0
0
.0
4. OIJ
oil
4, 01)
A . on
4,011
4, o o
4.n0
z-, Oil
4. 0 0
a n o
,00
rl 171
4.00
4.00
eA . 0 11
4, rin
Z-. 0 0
4.013
4.1-10
4.00
4,1110
4.130
4. 00
4.00
4, 00
4.00
4, 01)
4,00
4.00
4100
4.00
4. nO
4. On
4.00
4.00
4,130
24. 0 ll
2 1) 11
2--.On
24,0n
2 4, 0 0
24, - V,
24. U
24-011
2 -d - 0 10
,2 -a. 01
244. 00
24. 130
2,a. 01)
24,011
24. Oil
24-01)
0A. Oil
2 4. 00
24,011
24,011
24.01)
24,00
2zi. 01)
24,01)
24.011
24.01)
24.. 00
24,00
24.01)
24. OP,
24,00
24-00
24.00
PEAL; n--Pz-,l--HP)RGE
--------------------------------------
FLFI)AT ION ' TIME P r F F-,) T IF
i 6 .15- -?
99 6. 4
2.16
124. 4 0
12 21�
16 3
9 9 7. 9
Z6
4,9
.43�1-
I'L 9'9
2. O r;
.150
2-19 9 10
122 2 1)
12 11
7 IF.,
9
49.28
-1". i-1
7. 9
C5 3q:
1,?'?
1 7.
7 GZ!
2 73 8
1.37
9
Ln
6qz
-9 19
9A
34 - p
9
7
2 84
169. 2r.
'1'_' 0 6
.44-
11 . 9!3
3!1 1,:?
3. 2:1
149 .15 1
11 . -?,9
37 2.6
-J'-) . -2
8 1
152 0
.") ,
1 - 09
q, .14
q 31,
152,10
1 10
qc; 97
9 3
3 - D?
99
-3 89
I . 9z.
1F2.112
121 0
69.24
InL7, 7
tz,
'2
1.07
1', 1 9 4
97
.,
43
1 15
1.06
17"3 35
12 19-
1
3 -/, 0 0
50,
11 9
'-";'2 q 0
4, 83
176 .50
.111)
6.70
6,a71 8
1. 7c;
1,-", 6 . 6 0
.011
6.7(1
1'2 5- 9 . ,
3 0 -3
It 95
3,39
2 9, r-i 2 . 9
I 9!3
1A6 . 61)
Oil
6.713
10*29 .2
2,14
148 18
12
6 . 95
1 113 6 K, P,
1.27
Q.;7-
12.21
6,01
632.9
1.62
148.42
12.11
11.20
699.8
1.911,
152,79
12,02
78.27
953.4
1.814
152.79
12 1?
72.26
953.4
RTC, -4-
3.04
.91q-
11.96
15.311
2759.9
3.07
147.11
12.057
3,441
17e9.3
- , t,11-IRTH PPI-IrV I- A T RP-'U I ':� F r) 1 1, 111 Y- P
p P G E 3. li
CIMMAPY TAF,11-F
I - (;Et.-Fl7TC'O P!=.SUL-Tc
OF
STANI-IAPID
AND EXECUTTUF
ClItITPOL INSTPUCTIO-r-IS
IN THE
OPOFF? P-PP-IRM-P.
(A
AFTER THE
PEAV DTSCHAPI-IE
TIME
RATE (C.FF-I UPLUF;
INDICATES, A �1,.AT TFIP
A
111AF':;T I 0,Hl MARV( *? )
I NO I 17ATFS
A HynP,-'GPA?H
IjLl.(TH PFAk
AS LP'. T RO
( NT.
T f !'i h I
-.TAt,-jnppO
RA T N
ANTFI-7
"IA 1 N
PRECIPITATION
PEAk
DISCHARGF
rp! !I--T!-!,PE
1"ONTP01-
rjPA T NAl-F'
TAR-F
M.!',) I S 1-
TIME
-------------------------
P!-INI-IPF
---------------------------------------
r,
OPERAT
I CN
A P. F A
:11:
CONIO
I NCPEM
RE G f 114
eri M II IJ t- 4 T
DI RAT I Ott
AMIOUNT
Ic cI,IAT 10 ni
T I "IE"
P A T 9.7
PATP
m i
(HPI
(W--')
M)
(HP)
t IwJ1
(FT)
fHp)
r r-I
AI-,TF.cINAT=
1. (;Tnpi,,l
T I-) N'
?
n2 4
2
113
1)
00
24-0111
1. 91?
1 c. 3, 1101
1. 9 1 12
q.
TtQN
7
PPAI-H
. -,
OR4
.1
.10
172
4,011
4. 0 1!
1.9?
1 1; 3 , 1)!---i
I.-)
a
9 7!1 ,
=I-T f ON
9
APIDI-l',iTi
2 '^ I
.0
on
2- .1
4 , Ol
op
3
L,
t�., 7, 3 n
9-4L. 7
T I J P P-7
'Z
p CES U F! p
2q- 1
2
.0
4,013
'. 0!1,
24
2) 13 'R
1,? 3 , 1
-.1
13 1.
-!;P-T f ON
10
PEACH
"115 1
2
Io
.0
.11
4.11
/214.00
1) 0:,.�
-
102.37
J.? . qc�,
101 11
10
PUMDFP7
.1.1159
2
2
-d , n o
24,011
1,81,
-A 0-
lip
7,4'.
11)
ADDHY!-.
310
2
1,10
.0
n n
24, 01^1
03
1. !,! 3 0 1
j
Tom'-f 1 '11113P-8:3 07_�!PEEN MTN. RI_%1FP)
-!vmARY TARi.F
SFLF.17TFD
PcS11J1..Tlz,
OP'
STAN171AP0
AND 1_1TITUE
C.1-1h-11TPFIt-
[N�;rP!jCTf0"TS TNI THE
ORf-)FP P,:,PCIf
A
--,TAP(- I AFTER THE
Pf7Al/n T S3
CH, A P E
Tj�lc AMID
PATF (CFS,) UALLIFS
1NIF
3T- TF; A F 1- p T' T'_
Hyr P! If-_p,,,-)pH
p
A
1711 H=r-
7.T I ON MARV ( ? )
f NO I CATES
A H Y P A P H
1,.1 T TN PEAK A'= L A!= T P C1 f N T
Ap!)
P A 1, N'
AHM:1-
MA I N
PPPC1PjT0TTnt1,1
P E PP' 0 1 S
P'-; F
c rP1 H-T! !PF
nPAT MAGE"
TAPL F
Mil I S T
T[Mc
--------------
------------
P! JINI-IFF
nPIERP-
T_ T C.1-1
AREA
:1k
cno I
Nf7pC1,
1-111
REG TN
AM: I I N1 T
D! ip;'-)T 1 C!.N
A pi 1,D) !..I I T
C7; in"."I
T
c T- F--
(HPI
(HR! )
I
F
W.- T P7 P T P --------------
'20
RUNFIF!7
00 ?
2
n
4, 00
n 0
P,
14, 0
121, 6 4 1
V I:, (l,r f) 1, 1
?
P F!-"i! H
0"
2
.10
.0
4, nn
n
2 11
ni-�
q r41 1177UPF
3
P1 IMOFF
n i
2 139
4, F, 9
C", PUCT!lPF
-3 1
p F C, 1. 1 0
0 !1
'2
10
0
0 0
24, 00
4,•
1-) cz., A
`-FT�T f ni,.,
3.
f;)CA!-.H
0 0
Oil
24. n o
2
F rP!.!',-:T! PF
32
P!,! F
00 1
2
101
0
-2-4. n o
2 '80
a: rP! ii-Ti !RF
3,-,
ADOHYO
0133
2
2
13
!1
4, 013
.1 /*. . On
6.4
1`? 0 S4
0 C;
5 q- 2
11 A
1-P! 117TUR�:'
3?
PES1,110P
0 1.13
4.
en
11)
0
4, 110
24. 00
2 3 1
191 0 n
1. 12 1�
i.l.
r!
3,99 1.
-:�,z r T i lo t, i
p E A C H
n 113
on
2 Oil
3 1
1 0
A U 0
rp c
JR -
33,
0 13
0
4, 0 11
24 n n
.9-
4. C54,
1' 3 12
q rpi 11-. T'!.! PIZ
33
Anciw,,
0114
.7,
I.
2
Ill
0
"/, 13 11
2.4, 00
3 0'2
1 'i� 7 . R 7
112 03
c TP! ICTI-11RE
33
P F'Z, U!' P
.00-4
2
?
17l
192 . 02
1 *2 111
4 15
:-"Z T T 0 N
719
PF��!
.nil 4
.0
On
2.97
_04
12 1. 1
Tc,! i T! i P F
36
0131.
2
2
11)
0
4, 01-1
24, Oil
2 81.
3-51
.2 7 1.� 3
.1
rp!!rTl,!PF
7,6
PC-cl)l?,p
0 0 1
2
12
11)
F.,
4. Oil
� , 011
2"
2 8
1:3 7 6
9j
1 - -33
? I fs
P T T 0 H
411
p P"A!_ H!
0 0
2
2
10
0
4.1]0
24.00
2 7z
186.94
'p? . n,,?
1.33
*2 .2
_!1-T1_!PF
3
n01
2
.10
1)
4. On
24.00
2,90
9 5
22 6
2
c-rQ! H-TUPF
3 E5
Cl Cl H, Y Cl
0
14,
-02 10
0
L.O0
24,01
2 - 81"i
J,!D 9 . jc�
90
rP!!1..T1JPE
3 C5
occl Inc
0112
.
12
2
1n
4Ol
3113
�;q
cz
Ci7TIO1•!
41
REACH
002
2
2
10
0
4, nn
2 00
2 7!1
1195 2-1
1._ . !I
12
rcI 117T1_1Pq_
3"RUN,
FP
0112
-
2
10
11
4- 0 il,
24, n . P
3.1)
c- rpi !1--.T!.!PF
3 z:i
r4 n D HYD
0133
2
1)
fin
9 4, 0 ii
-
2.29
1, 9
c TP!.'I- TU, P F
34
PF!:�U!-!P
1303
0
.0
4, 13,11
24. 00
3-04
I'D "-.9
I FIN
4?
P FA f H
13 n 3
0
4.00
24. 0 il
2 .97
7R . 13
1 1? 11 1.
61,67
-2 2 -.2 - 6
c,rp ICTI !PC
43
pnf�HYCI
007,
2
10
0
41, 00
2 4 , 01
0 . p"?
-
i4, 9
1. 2 11
4. 7q-
3 -6
SFC.T I 0N
8
PEACH
0 1) 7
2
2
0
on
24, Oil
2,9?
1 -1 9 q,�
1 `2 2 1
14. 7c;
?049
P T 111 N
?
RIJNCF�r
11 ;7
2
2
n
0
4, no
24, on
2 .83
12 ."0 1.
16 . 01
1,--, 4 ,
Y'::Ff-T 1
10
A D,D H "," 0
014
2
2
.10
.0
4, 130
04. 00
2,82
147,11
12 . 116
2' . 2'
13 3 11
Y F, T [ 1-3 N
3
PUNOFP
On 3
2
11)
0
4. 01.)
24. V!
2 - 1?
11.99
6 On
13.18 0,
X'� 1-
S Fl- T f 0 N
PEA,_!-!
003
2
2
.10
1)
4. 00
24,01)
2 . 11
155 55
12 � 0
.
6. On
.
10-10.7
L.,
,,/SFCT I 0M
4
PUN10IFF
.0115
2
in
.0
4,00
24.01)
2.29
43 A
111.09
7,81
1530.8
`�C,ECT T ON
4
ADDHY,n
008
2
2
11)
.0
4.130
24.00
01-21
155.73
12.09
13.81
1643,9
0
01
7' T. 6
T�`Z,�T
7(,`uT
8'1L:1
T'Z
C10'7Z
00'7
0`
01'
Z
Z.
091
8
NOiiu3sx
z Iik11
�19'T.In,
L'Z
00'VZ',
00'17
0`
O1'
�
Z
6£0'
d�i]t�tii',
8
NLII1133SX
8'Or8
06'1.01
87,`Z.1.
�'50'TZ.T
Y'6'1
0'0'7Z.
CIO "7
0'
(11'
6
+'
T.ZT
H30_d
8
N0I133cix
0781
06'1.U1
81'Z•1
Z.£'79T
z6'1
00'Vz
00'7
Ci'
O1'
Z
L
TZT'
GAHii0 V
ZT
tgOI1JdSX
c0`�
'
'
'c9
OO'7Z
UO`7
'
cvi`S�17
3dlilii"ial
0 Z i. Z• 1
6L r
[1 0 Z T.
61 6 c, T
L 9 T.
0 0 - Z
00 7
G
0 T`
L
Z•
0 90
Ji',HtJt�t�
L
a if I1 �li-idi. S
�`.
8 �)9a1
c:7 `L9
66 1 is
x 0 68,1
90 t'.,
1110 '76
00 7
0
Cif
r'�
C,
£70
UAH000
L
SdI ilLii 161
7 66Z
y3
:'6 11
_8 tt
G7 L
CIO 7Z.
CI O 7
0
O T '
Z
Z.
0 ZO
�di-iNi 1d
L
d61-11:.;i idi'.Mi
i 89L:T
7:'n' c,Z
a Z,T
_/O OL.1
7L ` 1
00 76
00 7
G
CI '
u
c'•
4-ZO
i3AH00 V
L
38ii ilJl"idlS
I
_ [t ff
L 9
'i_i 0 ' 7 Z.
00 7
O
O T: `
Z.
Z
� T. 0
ddUNi i d
Nu I 1 i 3 s ,
T.'Z.T. 1
99'c:u
80't.1
i6'Lc.1
78`1
O0 7Z
G0'7
Ci'
0T`
Z
Z
81.0'
HJk�md
-77
NLII1-13'iA
T T.
- ' ' L Z,
;-; 6 ' T. 1
£ d ' L 8 T
C', 'C'1 ' T
U F Z
`' 0 ` r '
0 i_i y
`'
0 `
Ci T. '
G
G
8 T. 0 '
I�:,Ht�i;'
-7
NLI 1 iJ.�'�;.%i
6 Z•Z.7Z
i.1 t
=6 ;1
-ttG
6y Z
[i0 7Z
C10 *%
0
U1`
6
Z
T[i0
dd01.4i1a
77
F4u1J.Li3S>;
i.T
L 9rbT•
6G'T
CIO '7Z
00 +7
0
01'
t•
z
L1CI
i J.riu1T
'7
Nii11 i ci:;
c: 6c:'a
L6' 1.
uCI'f•T.
-utt'
iiL'
ii0'76
(ICI'7
C1'
Gi.'
cj
Z
iILIu
NC111-13b
T• :' o , T.
"9 S. Z.
c; 6 1 'i•
`c,
: 'i T
n C I
i
i 0 7 Z.
i i 7
i. C
i�1
i i 1.
t•
7
c,
7'
1. O
li i, i-1' 1CJti
177
r
Nib i 11.: i
`Z• c;1
c,3'
Ci'Z•1.
66'11C,T
T
ODC.
L10'7
0'
[{T.'
is
Z
Z.CIO'
H:_it!dci
a7
raCill id=;;C
_6 i J' C; 1
6.8'' i
" 6 11
- L i Et
8 L 1.
G 0 7 Z.
[I 0 7
0
C; T
0
a i'•i i i ci
'7 �
t`1 i_I 1 1.. J a , ,
3 e. C T
t; 4' 0 C•
6
cCT
G
l[
G
Uc
riT1
J
7
tJL{ 11. _ids v
i ^ L.
c Z. i
:' (i Z, T.
! 0 T. 0 81.
c; 8 Z
0 U ` Z
U 0 7
O
0 'C '
Z•
Z.
O i1
I o
-
'r
b C, Z.
:-' 6 1. T.
_ & f=r
8.6 6
0 0 ' ?' Z
[I 0 17
0
[I 1 '
6
L.
1 C1 it
CI c.LiL f.
c,i-; T
L6 1+.
V6 Z.8 T.
t:0 L.
[10 17Z•
00 7
CI
OT `
6
Z•
T.ICI
HllU
77
NCill�"i�c,:,
- Et N '
t T. ` k
CS CI ' 7 Z
CIO ' 7
Ct '
G i. '
Z.
Z•
[10
_; a rJ i i ci
7 7
N u 1 -L -i
B
is i T.
[t [i u, i.
is 6 s L_ T.
T T` T
00 '7 Z.
0 i,1 7
G
O 1`
Z,
Z
�' [1 Li
1 � i. H Q G
7 7
1 i 1 1
6
c! 6 Z
c_ 6 1• T
- B G
i.i 8 Z.
O G -,7,
0 CI
O
[1 T. `
Z.
Z•
T. [t 0
� u t a i i d
717
N u 1 1. .i
6 S - G. '/
�h xr C,
`.:1 li �, T
67 ` 681.
6.9'
0 0 7 Z.
U [i 7
O
01
(.•
6
0 0
G,' H -Pi tl
917
t'i t_! 1 1
1 1ti7
aZ` I.
70'Z,1
i
i
tltt'
?9
LIU'7t
GU 7
Ct'
UT.'
6
L•
L10`
�aLitdi-id
G 1.
i.1 T. C. L
tt It
1 i *i
t 0 7
I
(I
z
.. 1 CI
Idi
c,:_
c+6 T•
Z• L.T.
r',i ZC 1
6£ T.
00 -Z
0I:1 ?
it
l 1. '
Z,
r
b0 CI
.
I.
t'iCi 1 14i�� ,
7 c! r
c; 6 T
£ f. C T.
T L � c: T
r_ ! � T.
i '
i. 0 7�•
0 [J ?
Ct
-'
i .i r
G
C.
y Ci iJ
o,,.i i '1:- ,
8
z. 1:;7,
t.iZ c`
0 1.T.
Ft;
I "?
I
= `T
OU 7i•
iiCl 7
CI
0'i.'
Z•
Z•
OCt
d_U-4i,rj
o
r�oili.�;iidl.6
T. ' 8, <', T6
8 ' 1 c_
o 1. ' 61
1: ' 9 / .
61 ' 6
C10 ' % L
0 U '
C1 '
Ci T. '
Z•
c.
T: ' 0
J i, H 1� 1:1 h
r d C11 1 �I d i s
%
Y7
[
00 ,
0>
J
606
H. i!y.7d
tJLi1.1.J�`'
y 77
�1 �',1
-tltt
i'6 1
0C1 '�'.
Ct0 7
O
l'IT.
Z
6
6z0
j.�Litilid
i.
u i.`tT•
Grp cii
ii1 �•T•
T � t r,1
6y Z
00 7Z
Ci0 7
[i
[i1'
Z:
Z.
Z•Z0
i�iHU.�v
t•
tiCiI1;1�= ,
:- '4 {.
r
, : ,
1.'z i.
-,
c,T �.1L'rt
�.Z• Z
00 r, Z
U 0 7
0 '
[t T '
Z.
Z,
c; 0 G'
H"�irSd
Nuii'S ;.:
T. 4J801.1•
liJ .. >
kSzi i;
t6H.
c1�)
irV; i
id�ii
>r,1 z
cdn;
crJH
c 1W 0--)
-; . _1 ,
'. .1. ,. f�
..
�.1, 1'b
3;.J A l
; , H:. -,�-,
iNG 11.,•1 13 1>
ClJ
1N' ILLJ'•,.
_'
Nu 11k�d. It]
- -
iNi 1ui.J ,H
* `i
N 1 38
Li d'._iN i
all-40--Ii
�F
ty �c��
i'3i i 1 It rjadLi
ij
____-----------_______________{_________
ddUNli6i
--------------------
--- --
dWll
11LtW
d io ll.
3!DHrvludu
IG611,4,0:-1
�cirii._1tid1_:
3' i6i,7IHjS i ;J
:i1;::Sd
NCI I
i0l 16 I J_ dd
t:1 HW
`i J1N
1.41 Ho
tJrBNiJrvt�i'S
r�Ci % i d:
INJ
ud 1'c'v-1 Z:;tz1
t".38 H1 i tit
Hdk d'_1 6c
"_;AH ti j31H.::11
Utd 1
i L)
:%16t)W NO 11S3t-IO
0
Hdk',=�i`-I08GAH
r�r_;1 ilk`id k1
S=.1.G:J Ljrt 1
v;:�iilHf'� d; �s-tad Utvk�
�v11
d�1d��H:J'S1li %1C`+d
SHl
d�1ski taicIH1S
�'J
li i_l.=c�=id ddij';iJ i=1 t� 1
�- Ni 1 i 1-i idl, t%i
1 ICii�1t-iL?Lt
.3f i i i l i-1S%;d
CJtvd
t:ir_{H.:itJk'iS
ail
1 iI IS:-i61 t;: l�i�
1 6 - [.
is ;�i
1. C-i 1. { L'
L a.'iLid ' IN -1 W r, ti' i) i3-6 - 1 T rid: i f"1 id 1 �iH...i :1ui_ir` � Hlcii 1t
LJ
0ax i; 661
r. t".11-PTH elp!iclk !_AST (,_�PEE11 �rN, P! W P)
-1,-0 1
T
_E
I - SELECTIF0 RESULTS.
01=
STANOPP()
ANI-)
171-1 T f 1_1 F
Mt' TRI-71L I IN THE
I-tPf:,EP
rA
1;T"-1,P(*1 AFTFP
T!JE
PFAK DTS,'_-HAP-,F
71"-F
PATF ('71"S.). 1JAILU"'
P. PL'.P.7T T P
HY.".I-0 �-`i P H
.
A
n. I j!=_ s 'r t or. f-)
p le,,,( ? )
i t.4o i CATES
A H1Yr)R!_lI_;PPPH
Id [TH PF"II<
AS, LASIT
P0 ("1 T*.
ST
A -! D A PP.
PA T 1�,l
ANTEC
M Pi It'-2
pp'=I- I P T T AT I rN
G7CA!r D f S, c:
PA!;, . !: F
T'cP' I I- T 1J P F
C Lit . I T P!
ORA! NP41-:,
TAPI.F
�11-1. f 1:; T
T f M F
--------------------------
RUNOFF
------
c
T K'r-PFM
PPG I
H M! I 1i N T
0-UPAT I C!!%4
AP10UHT
ELE',)AT I IDN,
T I
P P.- T E.
T P"
Q MI f
HP
HQ1)
M)
(HP.)
r p'4 1
T
P'.9
1 'F T P
1 C T!-1 p
'x"-3 P7!-T T 1-3t.1
0
A 0 F1 HY 0
'113
0
4.00
'2 16
22 01�
2 2 `z
cz,_1
99
TP-M-Ti-lipp,
2
PE'St j0p
11)
0
4 � On
2 0 01
01.16
1'2 4 48
0 cz
9 9 -7, 9
1.
.111
0
4.01)
24. W!
I 17. 3.'
9 7, 9
'z;' r F
-DUCTI-IPE
13
n 4
0
4. 1) 0
2,' 13 0
q
oil -
99
0
IF rPI _IC Ti..!Pc-
13
PF C 1") I-i p
OU
2
'ill
0
4,00
24. on
15 02
09In
1 I_121)
3�
.313
T I n' N,
P! iH!-jp7p-
011
.113
0
4. 00
4. 0!"
1
1. , 141
CZ C.1
1
?"1? .3
QF."' T 1 !71 N
6
A F*! n H `"' D
0115
p
4.'. n 1",
24, 130
4 9 221
q
M
A,
P ! N!- F 1=
13 C5
113
n
4. Of!
00
6
12.
6 (_7 3
F !-It-!
A
I! Q
2
-
.10
0
4, n!'!
2-4. 00
1 39
1 7'. _)o
12 . 11
C5
FP!.!I-Tt'P.--
'I _4
P! !N, _q F F
n i)F;
21
2
0
4, 130
rRI H- TURF
14,
PF--')I-IP
0015
2
2
1.1
4, ON
.1
2 4, 0 1','
7 9
21-1 9 4:,-,
3 90 ll CAMP
F(-T
Y 10
.13-44
2
'2
10
0
4,On
24,00
1,37
7,93
.1
-3.-, T
Y C r. T f f?NKI
6.
RCA!-H
1,34.4
2
2
.1 1-1
0
4, 013
124. On
1 3 7
7. 93
9 . 12 1
3 A, . 32
2 It v
'='rRUCTUPt:'
c
RUNOFF
On 4
2
2
0
1?
41. 1) 0
24' On
93
.1 0 I_.j
c'TPI.II-T!_!PF
q-
PC,-,! I cip
n n
2
i n
.0
4. 0 n
.-).a . on
8
91.
ECT T: 1H
7
Rt!,,..,nFP
01
0
0
4, Oil
•12 4 . n 0
3 33
A Ill
T 11 i;�
F 1-_ T !_1 N
7
ADOH'•0
!1
14, 00
114, Oil
3, 2!.,
14 9 .15 1
19 .
C: rRI_Ir_TI..IPF_
L.
ADDHYD
i36,n
2
2
n
On
2 ��. 01)
e,
9 -17 -z
T ',Q!U-.TIJPE
4
P F S U C-I 0
0 fg, 1)
2
10
4, 0 n
2) 4 . Oil
1. 812
1 .2, 111
12 0
41
9,2 n 15
Y --'C T f 1_� N'
7
RI.JI%-IrFP7
0 0 6
'L 0
0
4. 01)
'2 4, 13.9
3.29
.1 . 91;
2 P:�
La C7, 1-1
Y,,c r iom,
7
AnO.W.,T!
066
2
10
0
4' - o n
24, 130
.9,4
11? ['31
6Q '713
11
L.139" 7
STRI Ir'P !PF
004
0
4. Oil
2 g� 0 131
7111
-
1-1 .90
'7
rP!.Il'T! PF
11
RUNIFIFF
n o,t
4. n!,
2 130
3 111
9 �
")P 9 !'1 2
rRUCTI
Anc)HY-
004
0
0
4 � 0 P
4 . III !I
03
j,:-? I . 9
9 7
3�5
01. 15
-rq !,J(-TIJP-
-11
P P '53 U1 F. P
101714
2
10
0
4. On
2 Oil
1, 13 OS
1. :'R ._317,
.1
q TR!.!rl- TI PF
1';?
PUN! -!FP
001
2.
17)
1!)
0
4. 0 1)
24. n 11
An-
12)
-2 q -2 q- n
CTP! ICPIPE
1'2
RE -77, U C P
n 01
2
2
ill
0
4. oil
24, 00
4. '83
176.50
n0
7 n
6P71,8
E.C. T I NI
14
APOHYn
OILS
2
2
10
0
4/ - 011
24, 00
1 7V5
16 6 6!l
6 . 7 Ill
12 cig . 4
E I T 11771 M
1 4�..
P!-INOFP
.001
2
0
4, 171 Il
24, On
13
915
3,39
9
, I
Y'7nFr'-r I ON
14
A P D H Y D
0 117
0
t.
113
0
4, 00
24,n11
1 91a
166,60
1) 0
6 . 70
1029 . 2
xc1cr-T I nN
7
REACH
007
2
11)
0
4.011
24. Oil
2 14
14?. 12'
.12
F1 . 9 q
106.11-A
-.P"�-T I ON
PUM017P
010
2
0
In
0
4.00
24.00
1.27
.99-
12.21
6.01
632.8
Y-F!-.T 1 !71
I - _' - N
7
ADDHY[71
1316
2
2
0
4. 130
2) 4 . 0 1)
1 62
148 42
1111. 11
1 1 -)1
1.3
e"? 9 , P,
YSF!--T I 0M1
7
ADDHYD
082
2
2
10
0
4.00
24.00
1.91)
152 74
12.02
77.68
946 , 3
',e!:; E17 T I f7l N
7
REACH
.092
2
2
ill
0
4, 01)
24.00,
1.89
152.74
12, 1?
77.62
946. 3 e
CFT9,1,,ICTIJPE
111
RUNOFF
n n,")
2
.10
.0
4, 00
24.00
3.04
_@Q_
11.96
c,-- . 30
2759 . 9
X C- 1711
P,F- 1, J 0CC 0 ? 'Z! 3
NORTH F?PC.IDI< I-`;T PFIJISFO (17,PEFN M.`N, P5,71LIF0)
C!
p A!
C:! 1 r-1 M A P'-,' T
P, C 1�
F F I
PFS-1
F C T F n --
Tc Ct=
STPt-,4nAPD
WID F�<Fr--lJTTQF
1-1-INTPOI
-1 -
lt-1 TH!- OPOER PF9!:-!-
'=,TaP('* ) PtFTC-10 TEE
PFAI< D-TSCHAP!-�F-
TI�IE ��'-JD
PATE (CFS1
I r-JID I CATE-IS
A P71LAT T!-. I P
H YD P!-11 G, P A PH
A
1-1,!qc3TIlDN MARK(?)
fNr)fl7.P-iTFS A HYl-1P0r--,RAPH
JJVTH- AS LAB �z T Pl.
-,
[MT, I
':F T T !-7i
C;TANl')P)Pr'1
RA I N
ANTEC,
MA I N,
R—FC T P I T A
T I CINI
PlC7�%Je P. T C, -:WPi-P�
!:FTP!-jl7T!jPP
1-!'! N TP!-1 j_
ORA! NAGE
TAIP!
T I 111,F
P 1 J N 1'-!!z F
7 rl
f-!PF7P.,,�T I
90FA
4�
COmcl
11114 Cp E I'll
OCI T1.1
-., g -.
I .1r
A M iU t i
-1
D 1-11 F-,'A T 1 C. tt
AM01 1�-AT
FIL. EQAT I CIM�
TIME
ROTE
OnTP
f SQ ri f I
(HP)
H. C?
( HP
(FT)
HP)
91 TF71P!%.!ATP
1 1-1 p i%j I
CrRUCTUPF
1.fl
p P, C: Q 0 p
00,71
I
1]
0
4, nil
-
2 4, 0
7 0
-
1 7. 11
L7
Y':3 IF r- T 11-11 N
-7
A F'j H I.` D
PO4
2
2
10
o!)
2 -x 0
V�3. 03
1,? , 1 9
P, il ,
=F7t--r r r
P H
2
2
.10
n n
2 0
9?
3
12 2?
C T T
19
L
4, nil
- I
2 4, 0
0:�
J't 18 0 "1
I
V` 3 3
---
—1 -
c rp! 11-TUPF
7
pc,::i)- p
2 5 1
4.011
' , 11
2� .11
� p
p
19 3
>1' 121 f7!" T I F t I
in
P CA! H
10
4.Oil
o
1 za . n n
oo
1 '12 3 7
P. q.
In 1
01
',Q C i --T
I n
P! I f-1 C, C7
059
113
n
4. 111)
.-)4, 0!1
1 81.
09
74.
-
3L.�
1. 2 q
',,':ZFI T T FIN
'111
F'! 1711 H Y r
-3 10
2
10
n n
2 00
2 07
111, •.19
.1 cz. L
IF-8
C,
December 17, 1982
Attorney Robert Perry
Perry & Schmucker
1480 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Perry,
Enclosed are certified copies of the minutes of the City Council and
Planning Commission approvals of the Green I'viountain Power application.
Please let ire know if you need any further information.
Sincerely,
David H. Spitz,
City Planner
D14S/rrcg
2 Encls
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
FOR
GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION
GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
By
TRANS/OP, INC.
P. 0. Box 2304
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
i
l
July 1982
1
l
1
ii
TRANS/OP INC.
SYSTEMS ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
P. O. BOX 2304 - SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
Phone:
Mr. Douglas G. Hyde
Counsel
Green Mountain Power Corporation
1 Main Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Hyde:
(802), 878-5977
July 26, 1982
In this impact study, various evaluations were performed for the traffic conditions
that are anticipated from business activities at the proposed office building for
Green Mountain Power Corporation. This new facility is to be located on Green
Mountain Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. Vehicular trips that would be pro-
duced and attracted by this commercial land -use activity were developed for the
critical morning and afternoon peak hours of the traffic generator during an
average weekday in the base year of 1983 and in the planning year of 1988.
Adequacies of the intersection formed by Shelburne Road, Green Mountain Drive, and
Bartlett Bay Road were assessed in terms of traffic performance for 1983 and 1988
travel conditions and of past highway safety records. In addition, pertinent
geometric features were reviewed for the intersection of Green Mountain Drive
and the driveway serving the site of Green Mountain Power Corporation.
Please advise of any additional assistance that may be required in regard to the
anticipated traffic patterns and conditions that would result from this commer-
cial development. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
C� �
I Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E.
Vice -President
JCO:rrb
Enclosure
0 PPE-
No. 2672Isn
#
�s7ONAL E��
111
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
SAFETY CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
DRIVEWAY FEATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
APPENDIX A, VEHICULAR VOLUME SUMMARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
APPENDIX B, LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
I
ITRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
FOR
GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION
GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
INTRODUCTION
Attraction and expansion of commercial activities increase the economic base
of a community and provide employment opportunities for the citizens. Traffic
conditions, however, are often influenced in the immediate vicinity of business
locations by vehicular trips that are generated by commercial activities. There-
fore, transportation planning is essential to permit continuing community develop-
ment with roadway and intersection facilities that provide efficient and safe travel.
I The purpose of this traffic impact study was to assess the travel de
mands that
Iwould result from the new office building of Green Mountain Power Corporation. The
location of this commercial land -use activity on the south and east sides of Green
IMountain Drive in South Burlington, Vermont, is shown as site 'A' on the map in
Figure 1. The study intersection of Shelburne Road, Green Mountain Drive, and
Bartlett Bay Road is identified as location 'B' on this same figure. This g roadway
site was selected for impact assessment, because traffic movements generated by
Green Mountain Power Corporation enter from or exit to Shelburne Road at this
major intersection.
The scope of this traffic evaluation was limited to volume demands during
morning and afternoon peak hours that coincide with the maximum travel activities
for this trip generator. Therefore, existing and developmental volumes were as-
certained for morning (0700 to 0800) and afternoon (1700 to 1800) peak periods to
I
�1I
CITY OF SOU7H BU.=ZLPtG1ON
Figure 1 Locations of Green Mountain Power'Corporation on Green Mountain Drive
in South Burlington, Vermont, and Study Intersection
Iassess the traffic impacts for the trip -making characteristics of Green Mountain
Power Corporation during an average weekday in the base year of 1983 and in the
planning year of 1988. This planning period from 1983 to 1988 provides a reason-
able interval over which to assess the traffic impacts of this office development.
The driveway that provides access to this site from Green Mountain Drive is
located about 107 ft on a center -line basis to the west of the right-angle turn
to the north on this commercial street. The study intersection formed by Shelburne
Road, Green Mountain Drive, and Bartlett Bay Road lies in a transition area from
rural to urban with fairly intense strip commercial development along the roadways.
At this intersection, both approaches on Shelburne Road have left -turn and through/
right -turn lanes, while all traffic movements are accomplished on the one -lane
approaches for Green Mountain Drive and Bartlett Bay Road. Vehicular flows are
regulated by an actuated traffic signal with three-phase operation, and the speed
limit on Shelburne Road is posted at 40 mph.
Development features for this office building are summarized in Table 1 in
terms of employment; trip generation characteristics, and in relative travel
patterns. These planning data provide the input parameters for the trip -generation
phase of this traffic impact analysis. Average rates of traffic generation for the
land -use category of general office building were obtained from the 1979 publica-
tion entitled "Trip Generation", -Second Edition by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers. Relative directions of travel on Shelburne Road were ascertained from
an employee traffic survey that was conducted by Green Mountain Power Corporation.
C!
TABLE 1
GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION
Green Mountain Drive
Item
Employment - persons
Ave. weekday trip rate -
vpd/employee
Ave. a.m. peak -hour one-way trip rate -
vph/employee
Enter
Exit
Ave. p.m. peak -hour one-way trip rate -
vph/employee
Enter
Exit
Non -diverted linked trips - %
Site traffic allocation on Shelburne Road - %
North
South
South Burlington, Vermont
Land -use Activity, General Office
107
3.59
0.50
0.09
0.14
0.43
0.0
92.0
8.0
5
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE
Vehicular movements generated by the proposed Green Mountain Power Corporation
office building were determined in accordance with the development characteristics
that are summarized in Table'1. Exact details of the traffic volumes for complete
development are presented in Table 2 for this commercial land -use activity. In
addition, the traffic impacts of this development on the intersection of Shelburne
Road, Green Mountain Drive, and Bartlett Bay Road are provided as design hour vol-
umes in Tables 6 and 7 of Appendix A, Vehicular Volume Summaries, respectively,
for morning and afternoon peak hours of the trip generator. These design hour
volumes were calculated as average peak hour values plus two standard deviations.
Existing volume characteristics at the study intersection were developed for
average weekday design travel conditions during the morning period of 0700 to 0800
and the afternoon interval of 1700 to 1800. These two times represent morning
and afternoon peak hours of traffic activities for Green Mountain Power Corpora-
tion, because the work day is scheduled from 0800 to 1700 for most all employees.
Volume data for the study location were available from the following sources col-
lected by Vermont Agency of Transportation:
1. Turning -movement counts at the study intersection - 8/25 and 9/1/81;
2. Machine counts at Sta. D105 - 8/28 through 9/4/80;
3. Machine counts at Sta. D431 - 6/9 through 6/27/78; and
4. Continuous counts at Sta. D2 - 1981.
Vehicular volumes by movement were adjusted for seasonal variations to provide
average weekday travel values in 1981 and were then forecasted to estimate traffic
patterns for the base year of 1983 and the planning year of 1988. The selected
factors of seasonal adjustment and traffic growth for Sta. D2 on Shelburne Road
were developed by Vermont Agency of Transportation.
0
TABLE 2
DEVELOPMENTAL TRAFFIC
Green Mountain Power Corporation South Burlington, Vermont
Item Trips
Ave. weekday - vpd
Enter
192
Exit
192
Total
384
a.m. ave. peak hour - vph
Enter
54
Exit
10
Total 64
p.m. ave. peak hour - vph
Enter
15
Exit
46
Total 61
a.m. DHV - vph
Enter
69
Exit
16
Total
85
p.m. DHV - vph
Enter
23
Exit
60
Total
83
IThe 30th highest hour volumes (30HV) for both study periods were selected as
the design hour volumes (DHV). Ratios of 30th highest hour volumes and average
Ipeak hour volumes to average daily traffic volumes (ADT) are available for several
years at the continuous counting station (Sta. D2) on Shelburne Road. These
Iaverage relationships permit the determination of design hour volumes for exist-
Iing traffic at the study intersection. The following situations of traffic load-
ings are presented as graphical arrays in Appendix A, Vehicular Volume Summaries
lfor the intersection of Shelburne Road, Green Mountain Drive, and Bartlett Bay
Road.
1. a.m. design hour volumes.
a. 1983 traffic conditions without GMP development - Table 8.
b. 1983 traffic conditions with GMP development - Table 9.
C. 1988 traffic conditions with GMP development - Table 10.
2. p.m. design hour volumes.
a. 1983 traffic conditions without GMP devleopment - Table 11.
Ib. 1983 traffic conditions with GMP development - Table 12.
c. 1988 traffic conditions with GMP development - Table 13.
These design hour volumes provided the levels of traffic loadings for the resulting
evaluations of intersection performance.
IBefore the traffic performance evaluations were determined by the critical
Imovement analysis - planning, needs for a separate left -turn phase on Shelburne
Road were quantified for both 1983 and 1988 design hour volumes with the commer-
cial development of Green Mountain Power Corporation on Green Mountain Drive. -
IWith a product warrant of 50,000 for left -turn volume and opposing through/right-
turn volume per opposing through lane, a separate left -turn phase on Shelburne Road
Iis just warranted with a product of 55,727 for only 1988 morning peak hour condi-
tions. This appraisal was based on left-turn/through and through/right-turn lanes
Ifor both intersectional approaches on Shelburne Road.
ICritical movement analyses - planning were performed with three-phase signal
operation including a left -turn phase on Shelburne Road to represent existing
traffic control conditions in 1983 without the incremental traffic volumes generated
by the activities of Green Mountain Power Corporation. The remaining traffic per-
formance evaluations for 1983 and 1988 travel conditions with the development
traffic included were developed for two-phase signal control without a separate
left -turn phase. This decision was predicated on the very minimal need for a
separate left -turn phase and lane on the Shelburne Road approaches to this inter-
section.
Measures of traffic operational conditions are expressed by critical movement
in vehicles per hour and by level of service. Service levels are qualitative de-
scriptors of traffic conditions and range from 'A' for excellent or free flow to
'E' for intolerable or unstable flow. Qualitative and quantitative definitions
of levels of service are given in Table 14 of Appendix B, Level of Service Descrip-
tions. Level of service 'C' or better is often selected as the desired criterion
in the design of urban traffic facilities.
Summary results of the traffic performance evaluations are presented in Tables
3 and 4, respectively, for morning and afternoon generator peak hours. The selected
analyses are located in each table as follows:
1. Upper third - 1983 traffic conditions without GMP development and with a
three-phase signal;
2. Middle third - 1983 traffic conditions with GMP development and with a
two-phase signal; and
3. Lower third - 1988 traffic conditions with GMP development and with a
two-phase signal.
These 1983 and 1988 vehicular volumes are described in terms of design hour volumes
in vehicles per hour and represent 'extreme -case' situations for the traffic demands.
E
TABLE �
INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Shelburne Road,'Green Mountain Drive,
and Bartlett Bay Road
South Burlington, Vermont
Approach Approach DHV Critical Movement
(0700-0800) (vph)
e d
(vph)
1983 Traffic Conditions Without GMP Development, Three-phase Signal
Shelburne Road - North App. 587 63
Shelburne Road - South App. 755 747
Green Mountain Dr. 21 15
Bartlett Bay Rd. 36 31
Total 856
Level of Service B
1983 Traffic Conditions With GMP Development, Two-phase Signal
Shelburne Rd. - North App. 650 126
Shelburne Rd. - South App. 759 383
Green Mountain Dr. 32 25
Bartlett Bay Rd. 36 31
Total
565
Level of Service A
1988 Traffic Conditions With GMP Development, Two-phase Signal
Shelburne Rd. - North App. 714 133
Shelburne Rd. - South App. 842 426
Green Mountain Dr. 35 27
Bartlett Bay Rd. 40 34
Total 620
Level of Service A
10
TABLE 4
INTERSECTION
1
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Shelburne Road, Green Mountain
Drive, South Burlington,
Vermont
and Bartlett Bay Road
Approach
Approach DHV
Critical Movement o_ax
,
f
(1700-1800)
(vph)
(vph)
1983 Traffic Conditions Without
GMP Development, Three-phase Signal
Shelburne Rd. - North App.
988
973
i7
Shelburne Rd. - South App.
736 ` h?
151-3
5
1 Green Mountain Dr.
37 V. /67k,,
24
Bartlett Bay Rd.
83 _ /0-W`
70
?��
----
1 Total
1082
ILevel of Service
1
C
I1983 Traffic Conditions With
GMP Development, Two-phase
Signal
Shelburne Rd. - North App.
1009
523
IShelburne Rd. - South App.
738
14
Green Mountain Dr.
81?
63
IBartlett Bay Rd.
83
70
Total
670
Level of Service
A
1988 Traffic Conditions With
development, Two-phase
GMP � P
P
Signal
g
IShelburne Rd. - North App.
1119
545
Shelburne Rd. - South App.
819
16
I Green Mountain Dr.
84
65
Bartlett Bay Rd.
92
78
ITotal
704
Level of Service
A
11
IIn all cases, level of service 'C' or better is obtainable for proper signal; timings
and the following lane arrangements on Shelburne Road:
1. 1983 without development traffic - left -turn and through/right-turn lanes;
2. 1983 with development traffic - left-turn/through and through/right-turn
lanes; and
3. 1988 with development traffic - left-turn/through and through/right-turn
lanes.
However, improved intersection performance results from two-phase operation with
two lanes for through traffic on Shelburne Road, even with the increased traffic
demands due to normal growth and/or development activities at the site of Green
Mountain Power Corporation.
To allow for two-lane through movements on both approaches of Shelburne Road,
two lanes must be provided for the exiting vehicles. The northbound traffic is
channeled into two lanes of a four -lane urban facility. However, construction of
an additional exit lane is required for the through southbound vehicles. This
extra lane can then be dropped by a taper section at a proper distance beyond the
intersection to return to two-lane, two-way operation on Shelburne Road.
Critical movement analyses for existing signal phasing and lane usage at the
study intersection were also prepared for 1983 and 1988 traffic conditions with
the developmental volumes for Green Mountain Power Corporation. Although related
summary tables of intersection performance are not included in this report, critical
volumes in vehicles per hour and service levels for full development traffic in
the two analysis years are for morning and afternoon generator peak hours, respec-
tively, as follows: 1983 - 933, 'B'; 1988 - 1027, 'C' and 1983 - 1142 , 'D';
1988 - 1262, 'D'. Therefore, normal traffic growth from 1983 to 1988 accounts for
a service level reduction in the morning analyses, while developmental impacts alter
Iboth 1983 and 1988 afternoon levels of intersection performance.
11
In all cases, level of service IC' or better is obtainable for proper signal timings
and the following lane arrangements on Shelburne Road:
1. 1983 without development traffic - left -turn and through/right-turn lanes;
2. 1983 with development traffic - left-turn/through and through/right-turn
lanes; and
3. 1988 with development traffic - left-turn/through and through/right-turn
lanes.
However, improved intersection performance results from two-phase operation with
two lanes for through traffic on Shelburne Road, even with the increased traffic
demands due to normal growth and/or development activities at the site of Green
Mountain Power Corporation.
To allow for two-lane through movements on both approaches of Shelburne Road,
two lanes must be provided for the exiting vehicles. The northbound traffic is
channeled into two lanes of a four -lane urban facility. However, construction of
an additional exit lane is required for the through southbound vehicles. This
extra lane can then be dropped by a taper section at a proper distance beyond the
intersection to return to two-lane, two-way operation on Shelburne Road.
12
SAFETY CHARACTERISTICS
IAccident characteristics on Shelburne Road were analyzed for a distance of
250 ft on both sides of the centerlines of Green Mountain Drive and Bartlett Bay
lRoad. The traffic accidents, as presently listed in the State Highway Accident
File for the five-year period from 1974 through 1978, are summarized in Table 5
according to numbers, rates, causes, types, and severities. This section of
Ifederal -aid urban highway is not currently classified as a high -accident location
by Vermont Agency of Transportation.
lA general guideline for the indication of a safety problem is the occurrence
of five or more reported accidents within a 12-month period. The 24 mishaps that
were reported over the five years result in a frequency of 4.80 accidents per
Iyear, which is less than the criterion for an accident-prone situation. Another
measure of relative safety is provided by a comparison of actual and critical
laccident experiences per one -million approach vehicles per year for the intersec-
tion of Shelburne Road, Green Mountain Drive, and Bartlett Bay Road. In Table 5,
the actual rate of 0.793 accidents per one -million approach vehicles per year is
Iconsiderably smaller than the critical rate of 1.623 accidents per one -million
approach vehicles per year. Again, the actual accident experience is less than
lthe critical value that is indicative of a safety problem.
IIn general, most causes of the reported traffic collisions are attributable
to driver errors and violations. The accidents at this intersection are not
Idirectly related to any elements of highway design and/or traffic control in
terms of any significant patterns by type of collision. The categories of types
Iand severities in Table 5 describe accident patterns that generally result only
in damage to vehicles and not in major injury to vehicle occupants. This -finding
I is further corroborated by a comparison between estimated and critical costs per
p
I
13
TABLE 5
ACCIDENT CHARACTERISTICS
Intersection of Shelburne Road, Green Mountain Drive, 1974-1978
and Bartlett Bay Road
Total accidents
24
Average accidents per year
4.80
Accident rate per 1,000,000 vehicles per year
0.793
Critical rate per 1,000,000 vehicles per year
1.623
Estimated cost per accident - dollars*
2038
Critical cost per accident - dollars*
2656
Accident causes
Inattention
9
Failure to yield right-of-way
3
Slippery road
3
Other vehicles
3
Improper passing
2
Following too close
2
Other driver violations
2
Accident types
Rear end
14
Sideswipe
7
Right angle
1
Turning
1
Falling object
1
Accident severities
Fatal
0
Personal injury
6
Property -damage -only
18
Conclusion: non -accident-prone intersection.
*Average cost per accident:
1. Fatal - $125,000
2. Personal injury - $4700
3. Property damage only - $1150
14
accident at this intersection. The estimated cost of $2038 per accident is less
than the critical value of $2656 per accident. The safety characteristics of this
Iintersection are, therefore, described as driver -related causes of non -severe
traffic accidents which do not exceed the calculated critical rates and severities.
�I
This intersection is classified as a non -accident-prone location.
is
DRIVEWAY FEATURES
The driveway that serves the site of Green Mountain Power Corporation inter-
sects the south side of Green Mountain Drive at a distance of approximately 107 ft
to the west of the extended centerline of the north -bearing section of this commer-
cial -area street. Adequate sight distances of 345 and 740 ft, respectively, are
available in northerly and westerly directions along Green Mountain Drive. To
provide a reference for comparison, a minimum stopping sight distance of 350 ft
is specified for a design speed of 50 mph. Driveway spacing is not an element of
concern, because this roadway functions as a local street with low speeds to serve
a mixed commercial area.
The site driveway at the approach to Green Mountain Drive should be designed
with a width of 30 ft and striped with a 4-in. yellow centerline at the midpoint
to accommodate properly the paths of the turning vehicles. A radius of 20 ft is
specified for each edge of pavement curve (curb return) that connects the driveway
proper with the paved portion of Green Mountain Drive.
I 16
ISUMMARY
The traffic impact of the proposed office building for Green Mountain Power
Corporation on Green Mountain Drive in South Burlington, Vermont, has been evaluated
in terms of operational performance at the intersection of Shelburne Road, Green
Mountain Drive, and Bartlett Bay Road for morning and afternoon generator peak
Ihours. In addition, safety characteristics of this intersectional location were
appraised in terms of numbers, rates, causes, types, and severities of traffic
accidents. Sight distances at the intersection of the site driveway with Green
IMountain Drive were measured to determine their adequacy for entering and exiting
vehicles.
The intersection of Shelburne Road, Green Moinitain Drive, and Bartlett Bay Road
is expected to operate at service levels 'B' and 'C', respectively, during 1983
morning and afternoon generator peak hours without the commercial development of
Green Mountain Power Corporation and with the existing three-phase signal and lane -
use arrangement. However, traffic performance measures are enhanced to 'A' levels
Iof service during these two peak hours in 1983 and 1988 with the incremental volumes
Igenerated by Green Mountain Power Corporation, if the intersection is operated with
a two-phase signal and with left-turn/through and through/right turn lanes of both
approaches of Shelburne Road. Better operational conditions are achieved with these
signal and lane modifications, even though traffic volumes increase from normal
growth and development of land -use activities.
IAs a result of the safety evaluations, the study intersection was judged to be
a non -accident-prone location. No significant alteration of accident characteristics
Iis anticipated at the intersection of Shelburne Road, Green Mountain Drive, and
Bartlett Bay Road, if proper geometric elements and traffic controls are provided
Iand maintained to insure efficient and safe travel. Finally, adequate sight distances
are available .for the traffic movements at the site driveway on Green Mountain Drive.
,I
17
APPENDIX A
VEHICULAR VOLUME SUMMARIES
r- .r 1,AN, S / OP f 4 C.
TABLE 6 18
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
CITYSouth Burlington.VT _ - _DATE - - ___DAYof WEEK Weekday _
�ITERSECTION belh,,,-„�P_ud , Green—lcwntain Dr- y.Bartlett-Bay Rd JOB No. GMP-1 ----
c�
I 7 -
O
En
T - J�
O
M
I r
rn
STREET
ENTERING
VOLUME
PERCENT
OF FLOW
TIME of COUNT
0700-0800 DHV
T__-- - ---_— -
GMP Development Traffic
---
VEHICLES COUNTED
ALL VEHICLES XXX
TRUCKS (XX
TOTAL
PERCENT TRUCKS %
- - - TRA'NS /0R
ITABLE
I iN C.
19
7
INTERSECTION
TURNIN(a
MOVEMENT COUNT
C1TYSouth Burlington, VT
- _-_DATE_,-__-
- -_ _DAY of WEEKWeek day
IINTERSECTIONShelburne
Rd., Green Mbuntain-_Dr.;
Bartlett
Ray Rd,_JOB No.CMR-1
I
a
z
O
.
_
I
~
-
O
Uj
N
p
;TBOUND
Green Mountain Dr.
EASTBOUND
STREET
ENTERING
VOLUME
PERCENT
OF FLOW
FIME of COUNT
1700-1800 DHV
GMP Development Traffic
---- —_--
VEHICLES COUNTED
ALL VEHICLES XXX
TRUCKS (XX)_
____IOTAL
PERCENT TRUCKS %
T? A NS/OP
1NC.
r t
TABLE 8
20
PTERSEC-1-10N
TU►RNING
MOVEMENT
COUNT
CITYSouth Burlington, VT
DATE 1983
DHV
DAY of WEEKWeekday
__._
I
ITERSECTION Shelburne
Rd. , Green Mountain
Dr. , Bartlett
Bay
Rd JOB No.GMP-1 _
�
rn
O
Ln
m
-
.
I
i
_
OLO
y
cv
.fl
00
EASTBOUND
STREET
I _ .
TOTAL
ENTERING
VOLUME
Green Mountain Dr.
0
> � z
O
m
fr-
o
Z
PERCENT T HAE of COUNT
OF FLOW
0700-0800
ithout GMP Development
VEHICLES COUNTED
ALL VEHICLES X_XX
TRUCKS -
PERCENT TRUCKS %
TRAMS SOP INC.
1 21
'TABLE 9
�TERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
CiTYSouth Burlington, VT - _ _DATE1983 DHV DAY of WEEK Weekday.
h I ERSECTIONShelburne Rd., Green Mountain Dr., Bartlett Bay Rd. JOB No.GMP-1
0
z co
o
O ° w , I
m
I T �
Q)
D
O r1 N O
r'M O N
1-4
Ln
1
- WESTBOUND
Bartlett Bay Rd.-
1
36
I39 _ —_� 0 43
Green Mountain Dr.
EASTBOUND
STREET
ENTERING
VOLUME
PERCENT
OF FLOW
TIME of COUNT
—
0700-0800
-- -- -
With GMP Development
VEHICLES COUNTED
ALL VEHICLE S XXX
TRUCKS
TOTAL
_
PERCENT TRUCKS %
TiRA,-,S/(DP
22
T,"LE 10
�TERSECTION TURNING MOVLNIFENT COUNT
CITY -_DAT E 1988 DFV
DAYof WEEKwee-kaa
I�TERSECTIONShelburne m
Rd., Green Mountain Dr., Bartlett Bay Rd. JOB No.GMP-1
o
Ln
c1l 0)
0 00
C, J
:D
0
�01
cn
wEAST BOUND
Bartlett Bay Rd
38
43
0 16
H -8
EASTBOUND
STREET
TOTAL
ENTERING
VOLUME
Green Mountain Dr.
V-)
Ln
00
0
00
-PERCENT
TIME of COUNT
OF
FLOW
0700-0800
With GMP Development
VEHICLES COUNTED
ALL VEHICLES XXX
-X)
TRUCKS
PERCENT TRUCKS
TRANS/OP INC.
I
1 � TABLE 11 23
NTERSECTION TUNING MOVEMENT COUNT
CITY South Burlington, VT DATE 1983 DHV DAY of WEEK Weekday _
�ITERSECTION Shelburne Rd., Green Mountain Dr.., Bartlett Bay Rd. JOB No. GMP-1
I Z .�
o
Q M to Ln
co
I _T -T -
I -
Bartlett Bay Rd_ WESTBOUND
. I
30
60 3 4.6
I 13
1 --70 --
!. 17
EE
STREET
ENTERING
VOLUME
PERCENT
OF FLOW
TIME of COUNT
-
1700-1800
—
Without GMP Development
VEHICLES COUNTED
---- ----
-------------
ALL VEHICLES XXX
- --------- ---
TRUCKS (X_"_
TOTAL
PERCENT TRUCKS %
TRANS/OP 11"4C.
/ I 111 TABLE 12 24
I PTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
CITYSouth Burlington, VT DATE 1983 DHV DAY of WEEK Weekday
I ITERSECTION Shelburne Rd., Green Mountain Dr.., Bartlett Bay Rd. JOB NO.GMP-1
Bartlett Bay -1
1
1 60
I
88
I
IEASTBOUND
I_
I
l -
WESTBOUND
85
-- 3 106
18-
40
Green Mountain Dr.
STREET
ENTERING
VOLUME
PERCENT
OF FLOW
TIME of COUNT
1700-1800
-
-
With GMP Development
VEHICLES COUNTF_D
ALL VEHICLES XXX
TRUCKS (XX)
TOTAL
_
PERCENT TRUCKS %
T R A t", S/ (D P H-) (- .
25
TABLE 13
PTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
CITY South Burlington , VT DATE 1988 DHV DAY o f V✓E E K Weekday
1TERSECTION Shelburne Rd., Green Nlountain Dr. , Bartlett Bay Rd. JOB No.GMP-1
_
IEASTBOUND
0
z
O
m
2
O
z
Green Nb untain Dr.
STREET
ENTERING
VOLUME
PERCENT
OF FLOW
TIME of COUNT
- -T -
1700-1800
-
With GMP Development
-- --
VEHICLES COUNTED
--
ALL VEHICLE_S_XXX
TRUCKS (X?Q_
TOTAL
_
PERCENT TRUCKS 96
26
APPENDIX B
LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS
TABLE 14
LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS
Urban and Suburban Arterial Streets
Qualitative Average Load
Description Travel Speed Factor
(mph)
Free flow
Stable flow
(slight delay)
Stable flow
(acceptable delay)
Approaching
unstable flow
Unstable flow
Forced flow
> 30 0.0
> 25 < 0.1
> 20
> 15
< 0.3
< 0.7
< 1.0
27
Ratio of
Service Volume
to Capacity
< 0.60
< 0.70
< 0.80
< 0.90
< 1.00
�Alln:aiter Quality
VERMONT
State of Vermont
Department of Environmental Conservation
Waste Management Division
tog South Main Street/West Building
Waterbury, VT o5671-0404
(802) 241-3885
FAX (8o2) 241-3296
brian.woods@state.vt.us
November 15, 2010
VINCENT GIORDANO
GE HEALTHCARE
101 CARNEGIE CENTER 217 NORTH
PRINCETON, NJ 08540
AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES
RE: Site Management Activity Completed — GE Healthcare, 25 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington
SMS Site 42010-4062
Dear Mr. Giordano:
The Hazardous Sites Management Section (HSMS) has reviewed the October 212010 report titled "Corrective Action Plan
Implementation Report" prepared by Heindel & Noyes (H&N) for work conducted at the above referenced site. The
HSMS has also reviewed information contained in the site file. With this information, the HSMS can now make the
following conclusions:
! During a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) performed in June 2010, concentrations of polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) above US Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels (USEPA
RSLs) for residential soils were detected at eight specific areas of the site property. PAHs were detected above
USEPA RSLs for industrial soils at three of those -locations. The Phase' II ESA report (dated July 2010) identified
•PAHs in shallow soils (0 to 6 inches) at the soil boring locations in each of the eight areas. Deeper soils and
groundwater did not appear affected based on laboratory analyses.
! Arsenic was detected in all soil samples (regardless of depth) above the USEPA RSL for industrial soils of 1.6
milligrams per kilogram. The concentration of arsenic ranged from ,17 to 7.5 milligrams per kilogram. The range
and detection of arsenic in every sample collected suggests that arsenic is naturally present in site,soils.
! A Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for addressing the PAH contaminated soils was submitted to the HSMS on July
30, 2010. The CAP consisted of excavation and off -site disposal of contaminated soils from the three areas with
PAH concentrations above the USEPA RSL for industrial soils and replacement with clean fill material. The goal
was to remove soils so that remaining concentrations of PAHs in soils were below USEPA RSLs for industrial
soils. The CAP was approved on August 24, 2010 and excavation activities began the first week of September.
! Approximately 720 cubic yards (approximately 808 tons) of fill material was excavated from three areas at the site
in August and September 2010. The excavated soils were transported under bills of lading by Waste Management,
for disposal at the Waste Management Turnkey Landfill in Rochester, New Hampshire.
! During excavation activities at the site, approximately 30 cubic yards of asbestos -containing siding .
materials were discovered in one of the excavation areas. These non -friable asbestos containing
materials were removed, transported, and disposed of at the Waste Management Turnkey Landfill in
Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jet./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury
Vincent Giordano
November 15, 2010
Page 2
Rochester, New Hampshire in accordance with a Permit to Operate issued by the Vermont Department of Health,
Asbestos and Lead Regulatory Program on September 27, 2010.
Following confirmation that the PAH impacted soil had been removed from the three target areas, each excavated
area was backfilled with compacted fill from Fontain's Sand Pit in Williston, Vermont.
To address areas of the site where PAH concentrations in surface and near -surface soil are below the USEPA RSL
for industrial soil but above the RSL for residential soil, a land record notice was filed with the City of South
Burlington for the property on November 2, 2010. The notice documents the corrective action performed at the
site, states that the site is appropriate for its current use as a commercial office building, and requires that any
subsurface work, excavation, groundwater extraction or change in land use at the site be noticed to the Department
of Environmental Conservation Waste Management Division.
The nearest surface water is North Brook, which borders the property to the east and south.
Several National Wetland Inventory wetlands are mapped within one mile of the site; none is closer than 1/16 mile.
No public or private water supply wells lie within a one mile radius of the site. Water and sewer service to the site
and surrounding buildings is provided by the City of South Burlington. That water supply is not at risk from
contamination from this site.
No other sensitive environmental receptors were identified.
No unacceptable risk to human health and the environment is present under the current land use due to any
remaining residual contamination.
Basedon the above, the HSMS is assigning this site a Site Management Activity Completed (SMAC) designation. This
SMAC designation does not release GE Healthcare of any past or future liability associated with the contamination onsite.
It does, however, mean that the HSMS is not requesting any additional work in response to the discovery ofPAH
contaminated. soils, in June 2010.
Please feel free to call with any questions.
Sincerely,
C uck Sch
Chief, Hazardous Sites Management Section
Waste Management Division
CC: South Burlington City Manager
South Burlington Health Officer
DEC Regional Office, Essex (via electronic mail)
Kim Kesler -Arnold, MWH Americas Inc. (via electronic mail)
Steve Larosa, Heindel and Noyes (via electronic mail)
Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury
AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
WATER QUALITY DIVISION
103 SOUTH MAIN STREET
WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: August 12, 2010 —August 23, 2010
PERMITTEE INFORMATION
PERMITTEE NAME: IDX Systems Corporation
PERMITTEE ADDRESS: 25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER: 3-9010
PERMIT NUMBER: 3017-9010.R
PREVIOUS PERMIT NUMBER: 3017-9010
DISCHARGE INFORMATION
NATURE: Treated stormwater
VOLUME: As necessary
RECEIVING WATER: North Brook
EXPIRATION DATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE: Ten years from issuance
date of final permit
DESCRIPTION: This is a draft authorization to discharge proposed for issuance to IDX
Systems Corporation for the discharge of stormwater runoff from the IDX
Headquarters facility located in South Burlington, Vermont to North
Brook. The means of treatment include grass -lined swales.
-2-
FURTHER INFORMATION
The complete application is on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office.
Copies will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for
Copying Public Records and may be obtained by calling 802-241-3770 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m., Monday through Friday.
PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS
Written public comments on the proposed authorization to discharge are invited and must be
received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) August 23, 2010, by the
Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality
Division, Attention Vicki Hill, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont
05671 or send via email to Stormwater@state.vt.us. If sending by mail, the general permit
number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any
submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the general permit number should appear on the
subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered by DEC prior to
issuance of an authorization to discharge under the general permit.
FINAL ACTION/APPEAL
At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information
received during the public notice period, the. VANR will make a final determination to issue or to
deny an authorization to discharge under the general permit.
Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the
Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the
Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont.
The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under
which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must
name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In
addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or
facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved
in the appeal.
The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B)
of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings.
For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available
on line at www.vermontiudiciar�org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport
Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. 4 802-828-1660)
Justin G. Johnson, Commissioner
Department of Environmental Conservation
AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
WATER QUALITY DIVISION
103 SOUTH MAIN STREET
WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: August 5, 2010 —August 17, 2010
PERMITTEE INFORMATION
PERMITTEE NAME: IDX Systems Corporation
PERMITTEE ADDRESS: 25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER: 3-9010
PERMIT NUMBER: 3347-9010A
PREVIOUS PERMIT NUMBER: 3347-9010
DISCHARGE INFORMATION
NATURE: Treated stormwater
VOLUME: As necessary
RECEIVING WATER: North Brook
EXPIRATION DATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE: Ten years from issuance
date of final permit
DESCRIPTION: This is a draft authorization to discharge proposed for issuance to IDX
Systems Corporation for the discharge of stormwater runoff from IDX
Offices and parking area located in South Burlington, Vermont to North
Brook. The means of treatment include a wet pond system.
-2-
FURTHER INFORMATION
The complete application is on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office.
Copies will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for
Copying Public Records and may be obtained by calling 802-241-3770 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m., Monday through Friday.
PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS
Written public comments on the proposed authorization to discharge are invited and must be
received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) August 17, 2010, by the
Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality
Division, Attention Vicki Hill, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont
05671 or send via email to Stormwater@state.vt.us. If sending by mail, the general permit
number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any
submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the general permit number should appear on the
subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered by DEC prior to
issuance of an authorization to discharge under the general permit.
FINAL ACTION/APPEAL
At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information
received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to
deny an authorization to discharge under the general permit.
Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the
Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the
Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont.
The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under
which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must
name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In
addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or
facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved
in the appeal.
The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B)
of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings.
For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available
on line at www.vermontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport
Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660)
Justin G. Johnson, Commissioner
Department of Environmental Conservation
VERMONT
State of Vermont
Department of Environmental Conservation
Waste Management Division
103 South Main Street/West Building
Waterbury, VT o5671-0404
(802) 241-3885
FAX (802) 241-3296
brian.woods@state.vt.us
Donna Kinville
South Burlington City Clerk
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
August 2, 2010
A GENCY OF NA TURAL RESOURCES
RE: Notice of Corrective Action at 25 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington -SMS Site#2010-4062
Dear Ms. Kinville:
The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, Hazardous Sites Management Section is sending you the
enclosed Executive Summary and Corrective Action Plan (CAP) regarding the proposed excavation of contaminated
soils from 25 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington.
Please post the Executive Summary on a public bulletin board in the town office and have the CAP available for
review for public comment. The public comment period will be for two weeks, from August 4 to August 18, 2010.
Please direct any questions or comments regarding the proposed CAP to my attention at:
Sincerely,
Brian Woods
Environmental Analyst
enc
Brian Woods
Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation
Waste Management Division
103 South Main Street / West Office Building
Waterbury, VT 05671-0404
802-241-3 885
brian.woods@state.vt.us
(executive summary only):
UVM & State Agricultural College Robert Berman LLC
The Heritage Automotive Group MDT Partnership LLP> "k
Kurt and Laura Reichelt Lark Inns LP
City of South Burlington, 17 Quail Run Vincent Giordano, GE Healthcare
Regional Offices Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury
Consulting Hydrogeologists
• Engineers
Heindel & Noyes, Inc. • Environmental Scientists
VN P.O. Box 4503 Burlington, VT 05406-4503 Voice 802-658-0820/Fax 802-860-1014
GE HEALTHCARE
25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE
South Burlington, Vermont
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PUBLIC NOTICE
Heindel & Noyes, Inc. (H&N) in conjunction with MWH Americas, Inc. (MWH) has
prepared a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to address identified polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) at three discrete locations at the GE Healthcare facility on 25
Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, Vermont. The locations of the identified PAHs
are an area of parking lot sweepings and vegetative debris from landscaping activities in
the area of a former maintenance shed; shallow surface soils over the former diesel
underground storage tank (UST) closed in December 2009; and an area south of the
main parking lot which may also have received parking lot sweepings.
The presence of elevated levels of PAHs in the three distinct locations was identified in
the MWH Phase II Environmental Site Assessment performed in June 2010. The
Phase II ESA identified PAHs in shallow soils (0-6"). No impact to deeper soils or
groundwater was observed based on laboratory analyses. The presence of the PAHs
resulted in a voluntary notification by GE Healthcare to the Vermont Department of
Environmental Conservation (VDEC). VDEC subsequently listed the property as a
hazardous waste site in June of 2010 (Site #2010-4062).
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ii
The risks of human health impacts resulting from the PAHs identified have been
determined to be limited to potential dermal and ingestion exposure. Potential receptors
would be of utility, landscape maintenance and/or construction workers on site.
Because PAHs do not volatize or readily leach to the groundwater with surface water
recharge, there is essentially no risk of contaminant migration away from the areas
impacted.
The CAP details the excavation, staging, shipment and disposal of impacted soils from
the three areas identified as PAH impacted. In total, approximately 600 cubic yards of
PAH impacted soil are to be removed from the site and replaced with clean backfi►I
materials. The excavated soils will be transported by Safety Kleen of Montpelier to the
Waste Management Turnkey Landfill in Rochester, NH. Prior to backfilling, confirmatory
soil samples will be obtained from base of each excavation to document impacted soil
removal. Once the confirmatory soil sampling results are received and show no PAH
impact, the excavation areas will be backfilled. The backfill soil will be sampled and
analyzed to verify it is of acceptable quality.
The source area mass removal effort will eliminate the contaminant presence and the
risk of human exposure for the commercial use of the property, thereby allowing for
closure of the site via the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VDEC)
Sites Management Activities Completed (SMAC) designation.
GE HEALTHCARE
25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE
South Burlington, Vermont
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
July 23, 2010
HEINDEL AND NOYES, INC.
Consulting Hydrogeologists, Engineers and Environmental Scientists
• Consulting Hydrogeologists
Heindel & Noyes, Inc. : Engineers
H N Environmental Scientists
V�
P.O. Box 4503 Burlington, VT 05406-4503 Voice 802-658-0820/Fax 802-860-1014
GE HEALTHCARE
25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE
South Burlington, Vermont
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
Prepared for:
Anthony Giardiello
MWH Americas, Inc.
VDEC SITE # 2010-4062
MWH PROJECT NO. 1008934
Prepared by:
Heindel & Noyes, Inc.
Burlington, Vermont
Engineer Review by:
July 23, 2010
• Consulting Hydrogeologists
• Engineers
Heindel & Noyes, Inc. • Environmental Scientists
VN P.O. Box 4503 Burlington, VT 05406-4503 Voice 802-658-0820/Fax 802-860-1014
GE HEALTHCARE
25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE
South Burlington, Vermont
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PUBLIC NOTICE....................................................................
i.
1.0
SITE HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATION ......................................
1
1.1 Site Setting..................................................................................................
1
1.2 Previous Site Investigations.........................................................................
2
1.3 Geologic Setting..........................................................................................
3
1.4 Hydrogeologic Setting.................................................................................
3
2.0
CONSTITUENT DISTRIBUTION..........................................................................4
2.1 Soil Results..................................................................................................4
2.2 Groundwater Results...................................................................................
5
3.0
CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL.............................................................................. 5
4.0
RECEPTOR PATHWAY AND RISK ANALYSIS ................................................... 7
5.0
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN.............................................................................
7
5.1 CAP Implementation....................................................................................
8
5.2 Contractors and Subcontractors................................................................
10
5.3 Required Permits.......................................................................................
10
5.4 Implementation Schedule..........................................................................
10
6.0
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN............................................................................
11
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
Appendices. -
Appendix 1 Project Figures 1-5
Appendix 2 Soil Boring and Monitoring Well Logs
Appendix 3 Analytical Result Summaries
Appendix 4 ASTDR Fact Sheet for PAHs
Appendix 5 List of Adjoining Property Owners
• Consulting Hydrogeologists
• Engineers
Heindel & Noyes,Inc. • Environmental Scientists
VN I
P.O. Box 4503 Burlington, VT 05406-4503 Voice 802-658-0820/Fax 802-860-1014
GE HEALTHCARE
25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE
South Burlington, Vermont
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PUBLIC NOTICE
Heindel & Noyes, Inc. (H&N) in conjunction with MWH Americas, Inc. (MWH) has
prepared a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to address identified polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) at three discrete locations at the GE Healthcare facility on 25
Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, Vermont. The locations of the identified PAHs
are an area of parking lot sweepings and vegetative debris from landscaping activities in
the area of a former maintenance shed; shallow surface soils over the former diesel
underground storage tank (UST) closed in December 2009; and an area south of the
main parking lot which may also have received parking lot sweepings.
The presence of elevated levels of PAHs in the three distinct locations was identified in
the MWH Phase II Environmental Site Assessment performed in June 2010. The
Phase II ESA identified PAHs in shallow soils (0-6"). No impact to deeper soils or
groundwater was observed based on laboratory analyses. The presence of the PAHs
resulted in a voluntary notification by GE Healthcare to the Vermont Department of
Environmental Conservation (VDEC). VDEC subsequently listed the property as a
hazardous waste site in June of 2010 (Site #2010-4062).
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ii
The risks of human health impacts resulting from the PAHs identified have been
determined to be limited to potential dermal and ingestion exposure. Potential receptors
would be of utility, landscape maintenance and/or construction workers on site.
Because PAHs do not volatize or readily leach to the groundwater with surface water
recharge, there is essentially no risk of contaminant migration away from the areas
impacted.
The CAP details the excavation, staging, shipment and disposal of impacted soils from
the three areas identified as PAH impacted. In total, approximately 600 cubic yards of
PAH impacted soil are to be removed from the site and replaced with clean backfill
materials. The excavated soils will be transported by Safety Kleen of Montpelier to the
Waste Management Turnkey Landfill in Rochester, NH. Prior to backfilling, confirmatory
soil samples will be obtained from base of each excavation to document impacted soil
removal. Once the confirmatory soil sampling results are received and show no PAH
impact, the excavation areas will be backfilled. The backfill soil will be sampled and
analyzed to verify it is of acceptable quality.
The source area mass removal effort will eliminate the contaminant presence and the
risk of human exposure for the commercial use of the property, thereby allowing for
closure of the site via the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VDEC)
Sites Management Activities Completed (SMAC) designation.
• Consulting Hydrogeologists
Heindel & Noyes, Inc. • Engineers
VN Y � Environmental Scientists
P.O. Box 4503 Burlington, VT 05406-4503 Voice 802-658-0820/Fax 802-860-1014
GE HEALTHCARE
25 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE
South Burlington, Vermont
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
1.0 SITE HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATION
The "Site" is located at 25 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, Vermont. A general
site location map is included as Figure 1 of Appendix 1. A detailed site plan showing
pertinent features and investigation test locations is included as Figure 3 of Appendix 1.
The site consists of one three-story building of approximately 46,500 square feet on
12.2 acres. The building at the site was construction at the headquarters for Green
Mountain Power in 1982. The site was undeveloped prior to construction of the Green
Mountain Power building. IDX purchased the site in 1999 and GE acquired IDX in
2006. The site is currently leased to All Scripts which performs data storage for the
health care industry.
1.1 Site Setting
The site is located in a mixed commercial and industrial use area just east of US Route
7 in South Burlington, Vermont. Figure 1 generally locates on the site on a USGS base
map. Figure 3 of Appendix 1 is a detailed site map showing pertinent structures and
features of the subject property. Figure 2 is an aerial photograph of the general region
showing the site and surrounding properties.
The western side of the site gently slopes towards Route 7 and Lake Champlain. The
eastern half of the site is generally flat with a ravine and drainage to the far eastern
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
portion of the property. A large portion of the site is paved parking with the remainder
either landscaped grass areas or woodland.
1.2 Previous Site Investigations
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was performed by MWH in November
2005 prior to GE's acquisition of the property, and again in May 2007 in preparation for
the potential sale of the property. No recognized environmental conditions (RECs) were
identified during these investigations.
In May and June 2010, MWH performed a Phase II ESA at the Site. An excerpt from
the Executive Summary of the Phase II ESA is included below which details the basics
of the investigation and results.
During the Phase II ESA, 22 soil samples and 8 groundwater samples were
collected for laboratory analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi -
volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), metals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, -
surface soils only), organochlorine pesticides (water only) and herbicides (water
only). The soil and groundwater sample analytical results were compared with
criteria developed by several regulatory agencies. The comparison criteria were
as follows: Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Groundwater
Protection Rule Enforcement Standards (ESs) and Preventive Action Levels
(PALs) for groundwater and USEPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for
industrial soil.
The results are as follows:
• The geologic materials at the Site consist primarily of fine- to medium -
grained sand layer of variable thickness underlain by dense clay.
• The depth to groundwater beneath the Site ranged from approximately
3.92 to 12.76 feet below ground surface (bgs). The direction of shallow
groundwater flow appears to be towards the western property boundaries.
• All of the soil samples contained arsenic at concentrations that exceeded
the RSL of 1.6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN 3
• Three soil samples (SB-4, SB-5 and SB-10) contained polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) that exceeded the comparison criteria. Of these,
only SB-4 exceeded comparison criteria. Analytical results summaries are
included in Appendix 2. There were no detections of PAHs in
groundwater samples.
• One groundwater sample contained lead that exceeded the comparison
criteria.
Subsequent communications with the VDEC indicate that PAHs are the only
constituents of concern at the site. The levels of arsenic in soils and lead in
groundwater are typical of "background" levels in Vermont. This was noted in a letter
from Brian Woods of VDEC to Vincent Giordano of GEHC and dated June 28. 2010.
1.3 Geologic Setting
The geologic materials observed from the ground surface to approximately 18 feet bgs
consist primarily of mottled, light brown, fine grained sand with trace amounts of silt and
gravel. Gray silty clay was encountered at approximately 7 feet bgs along the western
property boundary (i.e., MW-7 and MW-8). Evidence of impacts (e.g., stains, odors,
elevated PID readings) was not observed in the soil borings.
Descriptive soil boring and monitoring well installation logs are included in Appendix 2.
The locations of each of the soil borings are shown on Figure 3 of Appendix 1.
1.4 Hydrogeologic Setting
Groundwater elevation data was collected from each of the temporary monitoring wells
installed onsite prior to collection of groundwater quality samples. A summary table of
the groundwater elevation data is included in Appendix 3. A groundwater contour map
is presented as Figure 4 of Appendix 1. Groundwater flows from the northeast towards
the southwest at a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.025 feet per foot. Lake
Champlain is located to the west and is expected to be the ultimate discharge location
for the shallow groundwater aquifer.
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN 4
2.0 CONSTITUENT DISTRIBUTION
Summary tables of MWH Phase II ESA sample analysis results are included in
Appendix 3. A summary of the soil and groundwater sampling results are included
below.
2.1 Soil Results
PAHs were detected at levels that exceed the comparison criteria for
industrial/commercial property use in the borings S13-4, S13-5, and SB-10 at a depth of 0
to 6 inches. The S13-4 sample was collected in an area where vegetative debris from
landscaping activities was observed in the area of a former maintenance shed (believed
to be for lawn/property grounds care). Possible sources of the elevated PAHs are
parking lot sweepings and landscaping equipment exhaust. No PAHs were detected in
groundwater.
The distribution of PAHs appears to be sporadic and specifically located in close
proximity to S13-4, S13-5, and S13-10. As indicated above, S13-4 is located in an area
containing a substantial amount of vegetative debris from landscaping activities and
potentially parking lot sweepings. The S13-5 location is directly adjacent to a former
underground diesel fuel storage tank. The diesel UST was utilized for a backup
generator located within the main building. This 1,000 gallon UST was a double walled
steel tank removed in December 2009. No evidence of contamination surrounding the
tank was observed during the UST removal. After removal, the excavation was
backfilled, and the sample from S13-5 was collected from the backfill. The area
surrounding SB-10 may have received parking lot sweepings or snow storage which
has concentrated PAHs in this location. No other obvious source has been identified in
this area.
Arsenic was the only metal that exceeded the comparison criteria. The consistency of
the arsenic results across the site and across the vertical soil profile indicates that
background concentrations are being detected and that site activities are not related to
the arsenic concentrations.
No other compounds tested for were identified above EPA regional screening levels for
industrial/commercial property use.
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN 5
2.2 Groundwater Results
Manganese was detected in MW-7 and MW-8 at concentrations that exceeded criteria.
Lead was detected in MW-8 at a concentration of 0.152 mg/L that slightly exceeded the
Vermont enforcement standard of 0.15 mg/L. Both MW-7 and MW-8 had a shallow layer
of impervious clay at 7 feet bgs. The samples were turbid and the metals concentrations
can be attributed to suspended sediment in the sample. There were no other
groundwater exceedences of the comparison criteria.
Four of the seven groundwater samples, two up gradient (MW-1, MW-2) and two down
gradient (MW-3 and MW-7) in the same flow path, contained gamma -chlordane at
concentrations ranging from 0.17 ug/I to 0.045 ug/I, but no comparison criteria are
available for this compound. Chlordane, for which a comparison criteria does exist, was
not detected in any of the groundwater samples. The highest concentration of gamma -
chlordane was found in the up gradient well MW-1. MW-1 is nearest to the adjoining
University of Vermont Horticultural Research Center.
No concentrations of constituents were identified in the groundwater which appear to
require remediation.
3.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
PAHs are group of chemicals which are formed by incomplete combustion of organic
material being burned and in petroleum, particularly #2 heating oil and diesel. PAHs are
released from cigarettes, vehicles (particularly diesel fueled), coal, wood, oil and gas.
For this reason the presence of PAHs in soils in urban areas is ubiquitous. PAHs are
also found on charbroiled foods. Many PAHs are suspected carcinogens. Studies
performed by H&N in the Burlington area clearly show an elevated "background"
concentration of PAHs exists due to the long use history of the area and multiple historic
building fires. Mean total PAH concentrations in the downtown Burlington area are
11,000 micrograms per kilogram (ug/Kg) (H&N Report #2565; Burlington Background
PAH Study, Waterfront Park, Phase ll; October 14, 1992)
Exposure to PAHs occurs through breathing PAH-laden air (wood smoke, vehicle
exhaust), ingestion of tainted food products, and dermal exposure to contaminated
materials (soot, soil, water). An Agency for Toxic Substances and Release Directory
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN 6
(ASTDR) Fact Sheet regarding PAH exposures and health risks is included as page 1 of
Appendix 4.
PAHs are very large molecules made up of multiple cyclic carbon based rings. The
PAHs are released from the burning material as particulates which can waft significant
distances from the source of combustion. PAH particles settle on soil, tree leaves, and
other surfaces where they become "bound" to organic matter. Once bound to a surface,
PAHs do not tend to be released or dissolve in rain water. PAHs are not easily
degraded in soil or groundwater. They are generally considered as stable and immobile
once adsorbed to soil particles.
Three distinct areas of elevated PAH concentrations were identified at the Site. Each of
these areas appears to have a unique "source" as described below:
• SB-4 Area — The area surrounding SB-4 was previously used for landscaping
equipment storage. The area is also surrounded by piles of landscaping and
parking lot debris piles. These piles include leaves, pine needles, parking lot
sweepings and brush. All of these materials could contain elevated
concentrations of PAHs adsorbed from vehicle exhaust, furnace discharges and
asphalt pavement particles.
• SB-5 Area — This is the former location of an underground diesel fuel storage
tank (UST). The source of PAHs is unknown. The relatively low levels of PAHs
are near the "typical" background in urban areas.
• SB-10 Area — This location does not have an obvious defined source for the
PAHs observed. PAHs may have accumulated in this area due to snow
mounding, vehicle exhaust deposition or other "diffuse" source. The location is
directly adjacent to the woods line along the south east corner of the parking lot.
The presence of the tree line and predominant northwest wind direction may
have caused "preferential" PAH deposition of airborne materials at this location.
The data collected clearly indicates that the PAH impact is located in only the top 6" of
the soil profile at each location. The near surface presence and lack of vertical
migration of the PAHs is expected considering the likely sources. The fate and
transport mechanisms of the PAHs indicate that the impacted soils will not release the
PAHs into the atmosphere if left undisturbed and that migration to the groundwater has
not and will not occur. Biologic degradation of the PAHs is not expected to be occurring
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN 7
at a rate which would reduce the concentrations to below the comparison levels in the
foreseeable future. Therefore, little to no change in the extent or degree of impact is
expected without active remedial efforts.
4.0 RECEPTOR PATHWAY AND RISK ANALYSIS
The primary pathway identified for human exposure to the PAHs in soil is dermal
exposure to absorbed PAHs in soil. The immobile nature of the contaminants limits the
potential for groundwater and surface water exposures. Additionally the facility is
served by municipal water as are all surrounding properties. The impacted soils are
also located in highly vegetated areas minimizing the risk of creating airborne dusts.
The concentrations of specific PAHs Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene and
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene exceed the USEPA RSLs at SB-4. The Benzo(a)pyrene RSL
is exceeded at SB-5 and SB-10. All exceedences are in soils sampled from 0-6" in
depth. No other deeper soil or any groundwater samples contained PAHs above the
RSLs.
A qualitative risk assessment for human exposure in the impacted areas was performed
based on the receptor pathways and contaminant concentrations. The likely individuals
at potential risk are limited to utility workers, landscaping crews and construction
workers. Building occupants are not anticipated to venture onto the impacted soils. The
impacted areas appear to have minimal foot traffic beyond landscaping personnel. Risk
to landscapers is negligible during routine maintenance operations such as mowing.
The risk increases with use of leaf blowers, excavation and "hands and knees" work on
top of the impacted soil. Overall, minimal increased risk is present over and above the
PAH exposure the landscapers are subjected to via the exhaust of their own equipment.
Despite the limited risk posed, GE Healthcare has elected to voluntarily remediate the
defined PAH impacted soils.
5.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
The objective of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) is to remove the near surface PAH
impacted soils and replace them with clean fill, thereby eliminating the risk of human
exposure to the PAHs. Utilizing the Phase II ESA data, the Site Conceptual Model, and
physical features at the Site, the lateral and vertical extent of soils to be removed has
been defined at the SB-4, SB-5 and SB-10 areas. It is estimated that a total of
approximately 600 cubic yards of soil will be removed and shipped to a licensed facility
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN 8
for disposal. The lateral extent of the proposed excavations are shown on Figure 5 of
Appendix 1. The table below shows the area, depth of excavation and volume of
material to be removed from each location:
Location
Excavation Limits
Area
(sq. feet
Depth
feet
Volume
cu.yds.)
SB-4
Limits of landscaping debris and shed
foundation.
7,000
2
520
SB-5
10 feet beyond the former UST perimeter
800
1
30
SB-10
Physical constraints of grass area
981
1
40
The proposed excavation depth in the SB-4 area is slightly greater than the other
locations due to the mounding of debris and infilling of a ravine on the southeastern
corner of the source area.
5.1 CAP Implementation
The excavation activities will be performed by a GE Healthcare approved excavator and
overseen jointly by H&N and MWH. All workers performing CAP activities will have
OSHA 29CFR1910.120 HAZWOPER 40 hr training. The areas of excavation will be
pre -marked and the DigSafe network notified as required by Vermont state law. H&N
will also coordinate with GE Healthcare to obtain all engineering drawings available for
the facility to identify the locations of utility lines within 100 feet of the proposed
excavations. If deemed necessary a private utility locator will be contracted to confirm
the locations of nearby utilities. Several large pine trees and one deciduous tree will be
removed to facilitate complete access to the excavation areas. The trees will be cut into
8 to 12 foot lengths and placed in the woods on property.
Soil will be removed from each of the specified areas until the goal depth is achieved.
The soils in the SB-4 area will be inspected visually to evaluate if all suspect material
has been removed. If evidence of landscaping debris remains, the excavation will be
extended until all suspect material is removed. No visual evidence of PAH source
material was noted in the borings at the SB-5 and SB-10 locations. Barring visual
evidence of PAH source, these excavations will be terminated at 1 foot below grade. If
staining or other visual evidence of PAH source is observed, the excavation will be
extended until all suspect material is removed.
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN 9
The excavated soils will either be "live loaded" onto waiting trucks for transport and
disposal or staged in lined, roll off dumpsters to await transport. All trucks and roll offs
will be covered with impermeable polyethylene or similar material to prevent dust
generation during transport and minimize rain water accumulation. The excavated soils
will be transported by Safety Kleen and disposed of via landfilling at the Waste
Management Rochester, NH facility under bills of lading.
Upon achieving the final depth of excavation, confirmatory soil samples will be obtained
from the base of each excavation. Four samples will be collected from the excavation
at SB-4, and one sample will be collected from each excavation at SB-5 and SB-10.
Each sample will be analyzed for the presence of PAHs via EPA Method 8270 by an
EPA accredited lab approved by the State of Vermont and GE Healthcare. While
awaiting the laboratory results, the excavated areas will be secured with orange snow
fencing attached to driven metal fence posts. The edges of the excavations will also be
slightly bermed with native soil to minimize storm water runoff into the areas.
Upon receipt of acceptable confirmatory sampling results the data will be compared to
the EPA RSLs for industrial/commercial property use. Assuming the data indicates the
RSLs are met, each excavation will be filled with backfill from a natural borrow source.
Likely sources for the fill include Hinesburg Sand and Gravel in Hinesburg and
Fontaines in Williston. One sample will be obtained of the selected backfill source prior
to initiating excavation activities to assure that the backfill is not impacted. The sample
will be analyzed for the presence of volatile organic hydrocarbons (VOCs) via EPA
8260, PAHs via EPA 8270, RCRA Priority Pollutant Metals via EPA
245.1/200.7/SM3113B and Pesticides/PCBs via EPA 608. The fill will be placed and
compacted to within 4 inches of grade. The remainder of the excavation will be filled
with topsoil, seeded and mulched. Prior to placement, the topsoil will also be analyzed
for the same parameters listed above and compared to the EPA RSLs for
industrial/commercial property use.
All solid waste materials derived from the remedial efforts (PPE, poly covering from
temporary soil stockpiles, and temporary fencing) will be disposed of as unregulated
solid waste at the Chittenden County Solid Waste facility.
Throughout the excavation and backfilling process, photographs and documentation of
the activities will be maintained. Upon receipt of the final disposal documents, a letter
report will be generated detailing the excavation activities and presenting the
confirmatory laboratory sampling results. The report will include maps showing the
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
10
ultimate excavation sizes, and sampling locations. Conclusions and recommendations
will also be made as deemed necessary.
5.2 Contractors and Subcontractors
All contractors and subcontractors will be approved by GE Healthcare, MWH and H&N
prior to initiation of work. All on -site workers will be 40 hr HAZWOPER trained in
accordance with 29CFR1910.120. The following is a list of the contractors
/subcontractors potentially planned for the implementation of this CAP:
Tree Clearing, Soil Excavation and Backfilling
Engineers Construction, Inc.
P.O. Box 2187
South Burlington, Vermont
Laboratory Testin
Test America Laboratories
301 Alpha Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
Waste Transport and Disposal
Safety Kleen
Montpelier, Vermont (Transportation)
Waste Management Turnkey Landfill
Rochester, New Hampshire (Disposal Site)
5.3 Required Permits
No permits are anticipated as being required for this CAP.
5.4 Implementation Schedule
GE Healthcare plans to initiate remediation immediately upon completion of the required
public notification period. Backfill sampling and analyses will be performed during the
public review period. Excavation and backfilling of the proposed excavation areas will
GE HEALTHCARE - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
11
be completed within 1 week of project initiation. Transport of all excavated materials
should be completed within two weeks of project initiation. The remediation summary
letter report will be generated within 4 weeks of receipt of all laboratory results and
manifests documenting soil disposal.
6.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
A comprehensive health and safety plan for performance of the CAP will be generated
and submitted prior to initiation of work.
U:\PROJECTS\MWH - GE Healthcare\Corrective Action Plan 7-23-10 Final.doc
APPENDIX 1
USGS Map
p
'fie i . q" „ �, \ � , ;�,, J t � •aP i�
\} t t l
,p A 41
Lit
r
la
�• t 1, "? �r ��
t � 1
n
r, 7
h ti
r ,
ds
Site
\ pr,
• i i �
�1
1
i •y{ i � �t
w
F
Li r
.01
4 J . {
!n {� /((Jj , 1� � a'i�p �� rr ��. E �'. �\� •i ��^ti,.',��„x �A4
• I r�
A f • '
x F fw s r • ti J��+Y
p • lij
t fJJ. X F a ) 1
. f j
r 1 T •
S `
0 0.1 0.2 0.4
Mips
25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403 N Heindel and Noyes
• Hytlrogeology � Ecology •
•Environmental Engin®aring•
W E SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS
. I N F OR MA"f I ON dk
July 13, 2010 s VISUALIZATION
Orthophoto year: x
Map produced by: Author Easting: W 72 36 31.68 _ 5 F. R V I C F. S
U.\PROJECTSVloodsWpm\Boods.mxd Northing: N443328.84
17
25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
July 13, 2010
Orthophoto year:
Map produced by: Author Eastmg: W 72 36 31.68
U:\PR0JECOJECTS\floodsWprs\Floods.mxtl Northing: N 44 33 28.84
0 0015 0.03 0.06
Miles
N Heindel and Noyes
• Nytlrogeology • Ecology •
• Env iron meetat Engineering •
W E
CONSU T N. � NT T AND N -IN RS INF OR MA'IE I O N &
s VISUALIZATION
SF:R V I C FIS
r' ^- -L ,
1
MW-6/ B-6
t
f j
l
tf
MW-8 SB
r
wow
_ � mm
"�M 5/SB-�5'°
li
MW-7/SB-7
Ic
s1111011M
it �":wr,a
3 S
r
t
t
t
i
i
` —1
0
lr,
iPAMS M
W 2/SB-2
4 �►_`
i
L .. MW-1 /SB-1
I w
(
i
(
(
1
i (
1
( ll 37 "f`t7C 9i �� I
i
t
►MW-4/SB-4
1f 1f r
f Ifr
ff /ram rosF
r
f � r
DIL BORING LOCATIONS
ON 0 100 200
i I i
0
Orr a' som ff*V.MMW
GENERA
25 Gf
SOUTH
SAMI
r ! s
' MW-6/ B-6
78.13) +rroc�wno�ea--� —__-jr
I'� MW-2/SB-2
i ! (73.77) lit
I MW-8 SB M9W-1 /SB-1
I
60)
92
AM
sk "o ca S — I PW
(84.73) c 91
�o
u
ar spa , as w
cB-9 r
90
74
I 89.61
�43)7 76 188 r ;
77
n o 87 �rum
78 r
79 4 6 �I rr rar a aua mnw
80 rMm a. 85 AO" i 4�
81 84 A=
"�'iz. 82�` 83\
roi..r.m
R M\�-3/S <;
4w l (82.46) � r aar
f
w
t
GENERA1
25 Gf
WELL SOUTH
J10N IN FEET (RELATIVE TO LOCAL DATUM) 0 100 200 GROUNC
too
N—BASB}y",�1 T
to am -",;PWW
ow rN
me
-�
■
}
llb-06w�aml'
y
ar
I
mw--1/SB--`I
tSB—
p
I
k
k
�rt
k
ti
4
k
tON FORMER !f
k I CONCRETE
1 SHED PAD
SB-4
Ors @' slxw auvy4rW
L��
K> PROPOSED SO
n kn'yYx^ EXCAVATION A
APPENDIX 2
$
Ggl7
In�JtpG�rkP V
P.O. BOX 4503 BORING NUMBER. MW-1 Sheet 1 of 1
BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T:802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
BORING LOCATION:
DATE AND TIME STARTED:
FOREMAN: CHRIS ALDRICH
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED:
NORTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY
5/18/10 @ 1400 RIG HOURS METER START:
H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
5/18110 @ 1515 RIG HOURS METER END:
7675.9
7677.1
BORING METHOD: 4 1/4 HOLLOW STEM AUGER 2 114 H S A 6 1/4 H S A WASH/SPIN and DRIVE
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE. 24" HAMMER: 140 LB. FALL. 30"
HAND AUGER
NO.
REC. IN.
DEPTH FT.
BLOWS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
0-11" BROWN FINE SAND, SOME ORGANICS, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, DRY.
11-22" RED BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, TRACE ORGANICS,
DRY.
STRATA
CHANGE
PID
0
0
1
22"
0-Z
1-1-2-3
2
17"
2-4'
2-2-3-5
RED BROWN TO BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE VERY FINE GRAVEL, DRY.
0
3
19"
4-6'
4-6-6-9
DRY TO MOIST LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE VERY FINE GRAVEL,
LITTLE MOTTLING.
0
4
19"
6-8'
10-7-9-12
MOIST TO WET BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE VERY FINE GRAVEL LIGHT
GRAIN STAINED 5-10", WET @ 5".
0
8-10' 14'
12-10-9-14
END OF BORING.
SET 2" PVC WELL TO 14'.
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PVC Screen: 2
PVC Riser: 2
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack: 14
Bentonite Seal: 3
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
in. diameter Slot: 0.010 Sections: 10 Set from:
in. diameter Sections: 5 Set from:
Stick up:
to 3 bags 5 Cap
to 1 bags 1 Plug J
to bags Gripper
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill:
14 to 4
4 to +1
+1
to
J:\01a-200 General Electric Healthcare\123 - Burlington V R4-Field Data\[Copy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-18-10.xis]SB-11
a�qy P.O. BOX 4503 BORING NUMBER: MW-2 Sheet
G5Y!/IIl7�Juk BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T:802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
BORING LOCATION: NORTH OF BACK PARKING AREA
DATE AND TIME STARTED: 5/18/10 A 1530 RIG HOURS METER START:
FOREMAN: CHRIS ALDRICH H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED: 5118/10 Q 1650 RIG HOURS METER END
BORING METHOD: 4 1/4 HOLLOW STEM AUGER 2 1/4 H SA 6 1/4 H SA WASH/SPIN and DRIVE
1 of 1
7677.3
7678.6
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE: 24" HAMMER 140 LB. FALL: 30"
NO. REC. IN. DEPTH(FT) BLOWS SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
1 16" 04 1-1-2-3 LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND TRACE ORGANICS Q TOP DRY TO MOIST,
LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE ORGANICS TOP, WET @ 4", LITTLE
2 19" 24' 4-5-6-8 MOTTLING.
_
HAND AUGER
STRATA
CHANGE PID
AUGERED TO 13'.
SET 2" PVC WELL TO 13'.
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PVC Screen: 2
PVC Riser: 2
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack: 13
Bentonite Seal: 2
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
in, diameter Slot: 0.010 Sections: _ 10 Set from:
in. diameter Sections: 5 Set from:
Stick up:
to 2 bags 5 Cap
to 1 bags 0.5 Plug
to bags Gripper J
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill:
13 to 3
3 to +2
+2
to
J:\01a_200 General Electric Healthcare\123 - Burlington VT\4-Field DatalCopy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-18- 1 0.)ds]SB- 11
Lht
- V
P.O. BOX 4503 BORING NUMBER MW-3 Sheet
BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T:802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
1 of 1
BORING LOCATION:
DATE AND TIME STARTED:
FOREMAN: CHRIS ALDRICH
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED:
NEAR VOLLEYBALL COURT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT
5/19/10 (M 0815 RIG HOURS METER START
H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
5/19/10 (M 1005 RIG HOURS METER END:
7678.9
7680.6
BORING METHOD: 4 1/4 HOLLOW STEM AUGFIR 2 1/4 H S A 6 1/4 H S A WASH/SPIN and DRIVE
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE: 24" HAMMER: 140 LB. FALL: 30"
HAND AUGER
NO.
REC. IN.
DEPTH FT.
BLOWS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
STRATA
CHANGE
PID
1
19"
0-2'
2-2-4-8
LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE ORGANICS, SOME MOTTLING, VERY
SLIGHT MOISTURE GRAY BROWN SILT SEAM 16-17" MOIST.
0
2
19"
2-4'
9-18-22-24
AS ABOVE TRACE SILT 4-10" MOIST MOTTLED,
0
3
18"
4-6'
6-11-13-15
LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND MOTTLED TRACE SILT MOIST,
0
4
20"
6-8'
16-19-17-23
LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE SILT, MOTTLED GRAY/ORANGE/BROWN,
MOIST.
0
5
15"
8-10'
19-17-17-20
AS ABOVE MOIST TO SATURATED Q 9".
0
AUGERED TO 20' SET 2" PVC WELL TO 18'.
END OF BORING.
PVC Screen: 2
PVC Riser: 2
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack: 20
Bentonite Seal: 6
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
in. diameter Slot: 0.010 Sections: 10 Set from:
in. diameter Sections: 10 Set from:
Stick up:
to 6 bags 7 Cap
to 1 bags 2 Plug
to bags Gripper 4
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill:
6-0 CEMENT
18 to 8
8 to +2
+2
1 to 6"
J:\01a_200 General Electric Healthcare\123 - Burlington VT\4-Field Data\ Copy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-18-10.)ds]SB-11
,y
qf, �' fR,\���
AYnQA_.
BORING LOCATION:
DATE AND TIME STARTED:
FOREMAN: CHRIS ALDRICH
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED:
P.O. BOX 4503 BORING NUMBER: MW-4 Sheet 1 of 1
BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T:802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
WEST OF SB-9
5/19/10 @ 1055 RIG HOURS METER START 7681.3
H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
5/19/10 Q 1345 RIG HOURS METER END: 7682.7
BORING METHOD: 4 114 HOLLOW STEM AUGER 2 1/4 H S A 6 1/4 H S A WASH/SPIN and DRIVE
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE: 24" HAMMER: 140 LB. FALL: 30"
HAND AUGER
NO.
REC. IN.
DEPTH FT.
BLOWS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
STRATA
CHANGE
PID
1
15"
0-2'
3-5-7-7
0-3" DARK BROWN FINE SAND AND SILT, TRACE ORGANICS, MOIST.
3-15" RED BROWN TO LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE SILT, TRACE
ORGANICS NEAR TOP DRY.
2
19"
24
6-8-9-11
04" RED BROWN/DARK BROWN MOTTLED FINE SAND, LITTLE SILT, TRACE
ORGANICS, MOIST.
4-19" RED BROWN TO LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND DRY.
3
20"
4-6'
12-9-11-13
LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND.
4
18"
6-8'
11-16-21-23
MOIST TO WET @ 14". LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND LITTLE MOTTLING.
5
15"
8-10,
7-8-9-15
SATURATED LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND LITTLE MOTTLING.
AUGERED TO 15'.
SET 2" PVC WELL TO 15'.
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PVC Screen: 2
PVC Riser: 2
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack: 15
Bentonite Seal: 4
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
in. diameter Slot: 0.010 Sections: 10 Set from:
in. diameter Sections: 5.5 Set from:
Stick up:
to 4 bags 5 Cap
to 0.5 bags 2 Plug 4
to bags Gripper
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill:
CEMENT 0.5 TO 0
15 to 5
5 to +0.5
to
J:\01 a_200 General Electric Healthcare\123 - Burlington VT\4-Field Data\ Copy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-18-10.)ds]SB-11
]9.
!
BORING LOCATION:
DATE AND TIME STARTED.
FOREMAN CHRIS ALDRICH
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED:
P.O. BOX 4503 BORING NUMBER MW-5 Sheet 1 of 1
BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T:802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
IN TANK GRAVE
5/19/10 (M 1400 RIG HOURS METER START: 7682.7
H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
5/19/10 @1 1500 RIG HOURS METER END: 7684
BORING METHOD: 4 114 HOLLOW STEM AUGER 2 1/4 H SA 6 1/4 H SA WASH/SPIN and DRIVE-
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE: 24" HAMMER: 140 LB. FALL: 30"
HAND AUGER
NO.
REC. IN.
DEPTH FT.
BLOWS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
STRATA
CHANGE
PID
1
8"
0-2'
1-3-4-3
RED BROWN FINE SAND AND FINE TO MEDIUM GRAVEL, TRACE SILT,
SLIGHT MOISTURE. TOP 2" DARK BROWN TOPSOIL, TRACE ORGANICS,
MOIST.
2
18"
2-4'
4-4-4-4
0-5" AS ABOVE, SLIGHT MOISTURE.
5-18" LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND LITTLE MOTTLING MOIST TO WET.
3
16"
4-6'
5-9-9-15
LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND MOTTLED SATURATED.
AUGERED TO 13'.
SET 2" PVC WELL TO 13'.
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PVC Screen: 2
PVC Riser: 2
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack: 13
Bentonite Seal: 2.5
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
in. diameter Slot: 0,010 Sections: 10 Set from:
in. diameter Sections: 3 Set from:
Stick up:
to 2.5 bags 5 Cap
to 0.5 bags_ 1_ _ Plug J
to bags_ _ Gripper _ _ _ J
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill:
13 to 3
3 to +2
+2
to
J:\01a_200 General Electric Healthcare\123- Burlington VT\4-Field Data\[Copy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-18-10.xls]SB-11
(Z.771V
�p7
p
P.O. BOX 4503 BORING NUMBER: MW-6 Sheet
BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T: 802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
1 of 1
BORING LOCATION:
DATE AND TIME STARTED
FOREMAN: CHRIS ALDRICH
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED:
NORTH SIDE OF DRIVEWAY
5/19/10 tM 1535 RIG HOURS METER START
H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
5/19110 Q 1700 RIG HOURS METER END:
7684
7685.5
BORING METHOD: 4 114 HOLLOW STEM AUGER 2 1/4 H SA 6 1/4 H SA WASH/SPIN and DRIVE
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE: 24" HAMMER: 140 LB. FALL: 30"
HAND AUGER
NO.
REC. IN.
DEPTH FT.
BLOWS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
STRATA
CHANGE
PID
1
18"
0-2'
1-4-4-6
DARK BROWN TOPSOIL, MOIST 0-2", TRACE ORGANICS.
2-18" RED BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND TRACE FINE GRAVEL MOIST.
2
20"
2-4'
13-18-15-15
0-4" AS ABOVE, MOIST.
4-20" MOTTLED LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE SILT, WET TO
SATURATED.
3
18"
4-6'
10-10-14-14
SATURATED AS ABOVE.
AUGERED TO 13'.
SET 2" PVC WELL TO 13'.
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PVC Screen: 2
PVC Riser: 2
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack: 13
Bentonite Seal: 2.5
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
in. diameter Slot: 0,010 Sections: 10 Set from:
in. diameter Sections: 5 Set from:
Stick up:
to 2.5 bags 5 Cap
to 1 bags 1 Plug 4
to bags Gripper J
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill:
1 to 0' CEMENT
13 to 3
3 to +2
+2
to
J:\01a-200 General Electric Healthcare\123 - Burlington VT\4-Field DatalCopy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-18-10.x1s]SB-11
dn0dwAlzrr
-
P.O. BOX 4503 BORING NUMBER MW-7 Sheet
BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T:802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
1 of 1
BORING LOCATION:
DATE AND TIME STARTED:
FOREMAN: CHRIS ALDRICH
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED:
WEST SIDE OF BUILDING IN LAWN
5/20/10 tM 0745 RIG HOURS METER START:
H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
5/20/10 [cQ 0945 RIG HOURS METER END:
7685.6
7687.1
BORING METHOD: 4 1/4 HOLLOW STEM AUGER 2 1/4 H S A 6 1/4 H S A WASH/SPIN and DRIVE
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE: 24" HAMMER: 140 LB. FALL: 30"
NO. REC. IN. DEPTH FT. BLOWS SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
HAND AUGER
STRATA
CHANGE PID
1
18"
04
2-4-9-11
0-1" DARK BROWN TOPSOIL, LITTLE ORGANICS, MOIST.
1-18" LIGHT BROWN/RED BROWN FINE SAND MOTTLED MOIST TO WET.
2
19"
24
11-15-17-19
AS ABOVE WET,
3
17"
4-6'
11-13-15-19
MOTTLED LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND SOME SILT MOIST.
4
10"
6-8'
24-24-15-20
0-10" SATURATED, AS ABOVE.
10-20" GRAY SILTY CLAY TRACE FINE SAND WET.
AUGERED TO 7'.
SET 2" PVC WELL TO 7.5'.
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PVC Screen: 2
PVC Riser: 2
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack: 7.5
Bentonite Seal: 1.5
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
in. diameter Slot: 0.010 Sections: 5 Set from:
in. diameter Sections: 5 Set from:
Stick up:
to 1.5 bags 3 Cap
to 0.5 bags 0.5 Plug 4
to bags Gripper J
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill:
0.5 to 0 CEMENT
7.5 to 2.5
2.5 to +2.5
+2.5
to
J:\01a-200 General Electric Healthcare\123 - Burlington VT\4-Field Data\[Copy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-18-10.)ds]SB-11
pff=K/z. 7V
&
AWK]VR
mm _
P.O. BOX 4503 BORING NUMBER: MW-8 Sheet
BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T:802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
1 of 1
BORING LOCATION: NORTH OF BUILDING IN LAWN
DATE AND TIME STARTED 5/20/10 A) 1015 RIG HOURS METER START:
FOREMAN: CHRIS ALDRICH H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED 5/20/10 Q 1115 RIG HOURS METER END:
BORING METHOD: 4 1/4 HOLLOW STEM AUGER 2 1/4 H S A 6 1/4 H S A WASH/SPIN and DRIVE
7687.4
7688.4
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE: 24" HAMMER: 140 LB, FALL: 30"
HAND AUGER
NO.
REC. IN.
DEPTH FT.
BLOWS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
STRATA
CHANGE
PID
1
18"
0-2'
1-4-11-15
04" TOPSOIL
4-18" LIGHT BROWN MOTTLED FINE SAND TRACE SILT MOIST.
2
18"
24'
21-35-43-47
0-10" AS ABOVE, MOIST.
10-16" MOTTLED SANDY SILT, TRACE FINE GRAVEL, LAYERED, SLIGHT
MOISTURE.
16-18" RED BROWN FINE SAND MOIST.
3
1 15"
4-6'
10-17-16-22
0-5" MOTTLED FINE SAND, MOIST.
5-15" MOTTLED SILT LITTLE FINE SAND SATURATED,
4
26"
6-8'
7-5-6-7
0-16" AS ABOVE, SATURATED.
16-26" GRAY SILTY CLAY TRACE FINE SAND WET.
AUGERED TO 7.5'.
SET 2" PVC WELL TO 7.5'.
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PVC Screen: 2
PVC Riser: 2
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack: 7.5
Bentonite Seal: 1.5
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
in. diameter Slot: 0.010 Sections: 5 Set from:
in. diameter Sections: 5 Set from:
Stick up:
to 1.5 bags 3 Cap
to 0.5 bags 0.5 Plug 4
to bags Gripper J
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill:
0.5 to 0 CEMENT
7.5 to 2.5
2.5 to +2.5
+2.5
to
J:\01a_200 General Electric Healthcare\123 Burlington VT\4-Field Data\[Copy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-18-10.)ds]SB-11
y AV�iwkli/3#caYn
_.........
P.O. BOX4503 BORING NUMBER: SB-9 Sheet 1 of 1
BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T: 802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
BORING LOCATION:
DATE AND TIME STARTED:
FOREMAN: CHRIS ALDRICH
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED:
IN WOODS SOUTH OF EAST PARKING LOT
5119/10 0- 1015 RIG HOURS METER START
H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
5/19/10 Q 1055 RIG HOURS METER END:
7680.6
7681.3
BORING METHOD: 4 1/4 HOLLOW STEM AUGER 2 1/4 H S A 6 1/4 H S A WASH/SPIN and DRIVE
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE: 24" HAMMER: 140 LB. FALL: 30"
NO. REC. IN. DEPTH FT. BLOWS SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
1 20" 0-2' 1-6-5-6 RED BROWN TO LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND TRACE ORGANICS Q TOP DRY,
HAND AUGER
STRATA
CHANGE PID
3.8
2
21"
2-4'
5-5-7-7
LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND TRACE MOTTLING Q BOTTOM DRY.
3
21"
4-6'
7-9-12-14
LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE MOTTLING, DRY, IRON STAINING, HEAVY
MOTTLING TRACE SILT BOTTOM 3" MOIST,
4
24"
6-8'
14-16-20-22
AS ABOVE NO IRON STAINING WET 7",
END OF BORING.
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PVC Screen:
PVC Riser:
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack:
Bentonite Seal: 8
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
in. diameter Slot: Sections: Set from:
in. diameter Sections: Set from:
Stick up:
to bags Cap
to 0 bags 0.5 Plug
to bags Gripper
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill:
to
to
to
J:\01a-200 General Electric Healthcare\123 - Burlington VT\4-Field Data\[Copy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-16-10.)ds)SB-11
G7Ji�tk
yy 7PL°�Yn9
P.O. BOX 4503 BORING NUMBER: SB-10 Sheet
BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T: 802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
1 of 1
BORING LOCATION: NEAR WOODS SOUTHEAST OF BUILDING
DATE AND TIME STARTED. 5/20/10 cQ 1125 RIG HOURS METER START:
FOREMAN: CHRIS ALDRICH H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED: 5/20/10 C 1145 RIG HOURS METER END:
BORING METHOD: 4 1/4 HOLLOW STEM AUGER 2 1/4 H SA 6 1/4 H SA WASH/SPIN and DRIVE
7688.4
7688.9
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE: 24" HAMMER: 140 LB. FALL: 30"
NO, REC. IN. DEPTH FT. BLOWS SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
HAND AUGER
STRATA
CHANGE PID
1
19"
0-2'
3-4-4-6
BROWN TO LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE MOTTLING, TRACE SILT,
LITTLE ORGANICS TOP 6" ROOTS MOIST,
3.8
2
24"
2-4'
6-10-8-9
AS ABOVE MOIST.
3
19"
4-6'
9-8-13-9
LIGHT BROWN TO GRAY BROWN FINE SAND TRACE SILT MOTTLED WET.
4
22"
6-8'
14-11-13-14
GRAY BROWN TO LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND, TRACE SILT, MOTTLED, WET
TO SATURATED 8".
END OF BORING.
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PVC Screen:
PVC Riser:
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack:
Bentonite Seal: 8
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
in. diameter Slot: Sections: Set from: to
in. diameter Sections: Set from: to
Stick up:
to bags Cap
to 0.5 bags Plug
to bags Gripper ASPHALT PATCH 0.5 - 0
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill: to
J101 a_200 General Electric Healthcare\123 - Burlington VTW-Field Data\[Copy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-18-10.)ds]SB-11
d lr, I 7/7?
Ae�`yihf" a
fv" ,.0W1
P.O. BOX 4503 BORING NUMBER: SB-11 Sheet
BURLINGTON, VT
05406-4503 PROJECT NAME: S/MWH GE HEALTHCARE
T: 802-658-0820
F: 802-860-1014 PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT
SOIL BORING LOG
1 of 1
BORING LOCATION
DATE AND TIME STARTED
FOREMAN: CHRIS ALDRICH
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED:
IN PARKING LOT
5/20/10 Q 1245 RIG HOURS METER START:
H & N STAFF: CHRIS ALDRICH & MATTHEW MILLER
5/20/10 Q 1320 RIG HOURS METER END:_
7688.9
7689.5
BORING METHOD: 4 1/4 HOLLOW STEM AUGER 2 1/4 H SA 6 1/4 H SA WASH/SPIN and DRIVE
AIR HAMMER
SAMPLING METHOD: SPLIT SPOON DIRECT PUSH CUTTINGS BACKHOE
SIZE: 24" HAMMER: 140 LB. FALL: 30"
HAND AUGER
NO.
REC. IN.
DEPTH FT.
BLOWS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
STRATA
CHANGE
PID
0-2'
USED 3" SPLIT SPOON FOR TOP 2'.
ASPHALT BLACKTOP.
3.8
2' 6"
BROWN FINE SAND SOME FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL SUB BASE,
1
15"
0.5-2'
12-18-22
0-3" AS ABOVE.
3-15' RED BROWN FINE SAND LITTLE FINE GRAVEL MOIST.
2
19"
24
18-16-17-18
LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND DRY TO MOIST.
3
18"
4-6'
19-16-17.18
AS ABOVE MOIST TO WET.
4
24"
6-8'
14-14-14-16
LIGHT BROWN FINE SAND MOTTLED WET TO SATURATED Q Y.
END OF BORING.
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PVC Screen:
PVC Riser:
Filter Sock:
Sand Pack:
Bentonite Seal:
Grout seal:
Well Finish:
in. diameter Slot Sections: Set from: to
in. diameter Sections: Set from: to
Stick up:
to bags Cap
to bags Plug
to bags Gripper ASPHALT PATCH 0.5 - 0
Flush Guard BTW Native Backfill: to
J:\01a_200 General Electric Healthcare\123 - Burlington VT\4-Field Data\[Copy of GE Health Care Soil Logs 5-18-10.)ds]SB-11
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS — 25 GMD, Burlington, VT
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: B. Guidi TYPE OF FILTER PACK: _#2 Filter Sand
GRADIATION: N/A
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Specialty Drilling and Investigation AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: 11 "
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: HSA TYPE OF BENTONITE: HOLEPLUG® chips
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE 4.25"ID 6"OD Hollow Stems AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: 2'
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION: SB-I TYPE OF CEMENT: N/A
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: 6" AMOUNT CEMENT USED: N/A
WELL IDENTIFICATION: MW-1 GROUT MATERIALS USED: Portland IV
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: 5/18/10
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: _ 5/18/10 DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: N/A
SCREEN MATERIAL: PVC_
SCREEN DIAMETER: 2"
STRATUM -SCREENED INTERVAL (FT)
CASING MATERIAL: PVC
CASING DIAMETER: 2"
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WELL CAP
(describe and draw)
INSTALLED BY
DISCREPANCIES:
4'-14'_
SCREEN -_
LENGTH _
10, —
SAND CELLAR
LENGTH
n'
_ TYPE OF WELL CAP: J-plug
TYPE OF END CAP: Integrated
COMMENTS:
I
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
_--- DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD N/A
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
LEGEND
ElGROUT
■ BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
3'
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN 4
END CAP
DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL 1 4'
BOREHOLE DEPTH 14'
NOT TO SCALE
C. Aldrich, SDI INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: 13. Guidi, MWH
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS — 25 GMD, Burlington, VT
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: __B. Guidi TYPE OF FILTER PACK: _#2 Filter Sand
ERADIATION: N/A
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Specialty Drilling and Investigation AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: III,
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: _HSA TYPE OF BENTONITE: HOLEPLUGO chips_
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE _4.25"ID 6"OD Hollow Stems AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: 1.5'
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION
BOREHOLE DIAMETER:
WELL IDENTIFICATION:
SB-2 TYPE OF CEMENT: N/A
_6" AMOUNT CEMENT USED: N/A
_MW-2 GROUT MATERIALS USED
Portland IV
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: 5/18/10
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: _ 5/18/10 DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: N/A
SCREEN MATERIAL: PVC
SCREEN DIAMETER: 2"
STRATUM -SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): 3'-13'
CASING MATERIAL: PVC
CASING DIAMETER: 2"
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WELL
(describe and draw)
SCREEN -_
LENGTH _
10, —
SAND CELLAR
LENGTH
0'
INSTALLED BY: C. Aldrich. SDI
DISCREPANCIES:
_ TYPE OF WELL CAP: J-plug
TYPE OF END CAP: Integrated
COMMENTS:
2'
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
`<<DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD NSA
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
LEGEND
ElGROUT
■ BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN 3
END CAP
- DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL 1 3'
BOREHOLE DEPTH 1 3'
NOT TO SCALE
INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: B. Guidi, MWH
0.5'
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS — 25 GMD, Burlington, VT
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: B. Guidi TYPE OF FILTER PACK: #2 Filter Sand
GRADIATION: N/A
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Specialty Drilling and Investigation AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: _I I"
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: HSA TYPE OF BENTONITE: HOLEPLUG® chips_
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE 4.25"ID 6"OD Hollow Stems AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: 6'
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION: SB-3
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: 6"
WELL IDENTIFICATION: MW-3
TYPE OF CEMENT: N/A
AMOUNT CEMENT USED: N/A
GROUT MATERIALS USED
Portland IV_
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: 5/19/10
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: 5/19/10 DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: N/A
SCREEN MATERIAL: PVC
SCREEN DIAMETER: 2"
STRATUM -SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): 8'-18'_
_ TYPE OF WELL CAP: J-plug
TYPE OF END CAP: Integrated
COMMENTS:
CASING MATERIAL: PVC
CASING DIAMETER: 2"
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WELL CAP
(describe and draw) 2'
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
7�7 —DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD NSA
SCREEN _
LENGTH
10, —
SAND CELLAR
LENGTH
2'
INSTALLED BY: C. Aldrich, SDI
DISCREPANCIES:
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
LEGEND
ElGROUT
■ BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
I'
DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
7'
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN g
END CAP
— DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL 18,
BOREHOLE DEPTH 20'
NOT TO SCALE
INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: B. Guidi, MWH
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS — 25 GMD, Burlington, VT
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: B. Guidi _ _ _ TYPE OF FILTER PACK: #2 Filter Sand
GRADIATION: N/A
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Specialty Drilling and Investigation AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: H1
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: _HSA TYPE OF BENTONITE: HOLEPLUG® chips
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE: 4.25"ID 6"OD Hollow Stems AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: 3.5'
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION: SB-4 TYPE OF CEMENT: N/A
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: 6" AMOUNT CEMENT USED: N/A
WELL IDENTIFICATION: MW-4 GROUT MATERIALS USED: Portland IV
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: 5/19/10
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: 5/19/10 DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: N/A
SCREEN MATERIAL: PVC TYPE OF WELL CAP:
SCREEN DIAMETER: 2" TYPE OF END CAP:
STRATUM -SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): 5.5'-15.5'_
COMMENTS:
CASING MATERIAL: PVC
CASING DIAMETER: 2"
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(describe and draw)
SCRE
LENC
IC
SAND CELL,
LENGTH
0'
INSTALLED BY: C. Aldrich, SDI
DISCREPANCIES:
J-plug
Integrated
0.5'
NGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD N/A
ROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
LEGEND
ElGROUT
■ BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
4.5'
TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
TO TOP OF SCREEN 5.5'
TO BASE OF WELL 1 5.5'
.� JLE DEPTH 1 5.5'
NOT TO SCALE
INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: B. Guidi, MWH
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS — 25 GMD, Burlington, VT
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: B. Guidi TYPE OF FILTER PACK: #2 Filter Sand
GRADIATION: N/A
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Specialty Drilling and Investigation AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: _I I"
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: _HSA TYPE OF BENTONITE: HOLEPLUG® chips_
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE: 4.25"ID 6"OD Hollow Stems AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: 1'
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION: SB-5 TYPE OF CEMENT: N/A
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: 6" AMOUNT CEMENT USED: N/A
WELL IDENTIFICATION: MW-5 GROUT MATERIALS USED: Portland IV
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: 5/19/10
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: 5/19/10 DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: N/A
SCREEN MATERIAL: PVC
SCREEN DIAMETER: 2"
STRATUM -SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): 3'-13'
CASING MATERIAL:
CASING DIAMETER:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(describe and draw)
INSTALLED BY
DISCREPANCIES:
PVC
2„
WELL
SCREEN _
LENGTH
10, —
SAND CELLAR
LENGTH
0'
C. Aldrich, SDI
_ TYPE OF WELL CAP: J-plug
TYPE OF END CAP: Integrated
COMMENTS:
2'
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
-.-,-DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD N/A
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
LEGEND
ElGROUT
■ BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
2'
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN 3
END CAP
- DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL 13'
BOREHOLE DEPTH 1 3
NOT TO SCALE
INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: B. Guidi, MWH
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS — 25 GMD, Burlington, VT
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: _ _B. Guidi TYPE OF FILTER PACK: #2 Filter Sand
GRADIATION: N/A
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Specialty Drilling and Investigation AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: IV,
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: _HSA TYPE OF BENTONITE: HOLEPLUG® chips_
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE _4.25"ID 6"OD Hollow Stems AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: I'
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION: SB-6 TYPE OF CEMENT: N/A
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: 6" AMOUNT CEMENT USED: N/A
WELL IDENTIFICATION: MW-6 GROUT MATERIALS USED
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: 5/19/10
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: 5/19/10
SCREEN MATERIAL: PVC
SCREEN DIAMETER: 2"
STRATUM -SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): 3'-13'
CASING MATERIAL: PVC
CASING DIAMETER: 2"
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(describe and draw)
DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING:
_ TYPE OF WELL CAP: J-plug
TYPE OF END CAP: Integrated
COMMENTS:
WELL CAP
��
EEN
GTH
END CAP
SAND CELLAR
LENGTH
0'
SCR
LEN
10
INSTALLED BY: _C. Aldrich, SDI
DISCREPANCIES:
Portland IV
N/A
2'
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD N/A
G
ROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
LEGEND
ElGROUT
■ BENTONITE SEAL
jFILTER PACK
TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
DEPTH
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK ✓
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN 3
DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL 1 3'
BOREHOLE DEPTH 1 3
NOT TO SCALE
INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: B. Guidi, MWH
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS — 25 GMD, Burlington, VT
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: B. Guidi TYPE OF FILTER PACK: #2 Filter Sand
GRADIATION: N/A
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Specialty Drilling and Investigation AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: _6'
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: HSA TYPE OF BENTONITE: HOLEPLUG® chips_
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE: 4.25"ID 6"OD Hollow Stems AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: 2'
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION: SB-7 TYPE OF CEMENT: N/A
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: 6" AMOUNT CEMENT USED: N/A
WELL IDENTIFICATION: MW-7 GROUT MATERIALS USED: Portland IV
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: 5/20/10
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: 5/20/10 DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: N/A
SCREEN MATERIAL: PVC - TYPE OF WELL CAP: J-plug
SCREEN DIAMETER: 2" TYPE OF END CAP: Integrated _
STRATUM -SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): 2.5-7.5'_
COMMENTS:
CASING MATERIAL: PVC
CASING DIAMETER: 2"
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WELL
(describe and draw)
SCREEN —_
LENGTH _
5' —
Lj%
SAND CELLAR
LENGTH
0'
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD -
IN/A
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
LEGEND
ElGROUT
■ BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
—DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
— DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
— DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN 2.5
END CAP
— DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL 7.5
BOREHOLE DEPTH 7.5
NOT TO SCALE
INSTALLED BY: C. Aldrich, SDI INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: B. Guidi, MWH
DISCREPANCIES:
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS — 25 GMD, Burlington, VT
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: B. Guidi TYPE OF FILTER PACK: #2 Filter Sand
GRADIATION: N/A
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Specialty Drilling and Investigation AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: 6'
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: _HSA TYPE OF BENTONITE: HOLEPLUGO chips_
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE: 4.25"ID 6"OD Hollow Stems AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: 2'
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION: SB-8 TYPE OF CEMENT: N/A
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: 6" AMOUNT CEMENT USED: N/A
WELL IDENTIFICATION: MW-8 GROUT MATERIALS USED:
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: 5/20/10
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: _ 5/20/10 DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING:
SCREEN MATERIAL: PVC_
SCREEN DIAMETER: 2"
STRATUM -SCREENED INTERVAL (FT)
CASING MATERIAL: P\
CASING DIAMETER: 2"
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WELL
(describe and draw)
2.5-7.5'
SCREEN _-
LENGTH _
5'
SAND CELLAR
LENGTH
_ TYPE OF WELL CAP: J-plug
TYPE OF END CAP: Integrated
COMMENTS:
Portland IV
N/A
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
`--- -DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD .
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
N/A
LEGEND
ElGROUT
■ BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
- DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL 0.5'
- DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK 1 .5
- DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN 2.5
END CAP
-DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL 7.5
BOREHOLE DEPTH 7.5'
NOT TO SCALE
INSTALLED BY: _C. Aldrich, SDI _ INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: B. Guidi, MWI I
DISCREPANCIES:
APPENDIX 3
Table 3
Groundwater Elevation Data
25 Green Mountain Drive - South Burlington, Vermont
Well
Depth to Groundwater
Below Top of Casing
(feet)
Top of Casing Elevation
(feet)
Surface Elevation (feet)
Depth to Groundwater
Below Ground Surface
(feet)
Groundwater Elevation (feet)
Date
Time
MW-1
8.72
101.32
100.00
7.40
92.60
21-May
9:10
MW-2
6.70
97.31
95.10
4.49
90.61
21-May
10:55
MW-3
15.09
97.55
95.22
12.76
82.46
21-May
12:55
MW-4
9.55
99.16
98.82
9.21
89.61
21-May
14:50
MW-5
7.61
92.34
90.96
6.23
84.73
24-May
11:01
MW-6
6.00
84.13
82.05
3.92
78.13
24-May
12:52
MW-7
7.50
81.93
79.05
4.62
74.43
24-May
14:43
MW-8
7.60
81.37
78.61
4.84
73.77
24-May
13:35
Notes:
Elevations are relative
(ug/kg)
99,000
5.2U
6U
5.1 U
5.6U
5.3U
5.3U
5.7U
29U
6.2U
6.1 U
5.4U
5.8U
9,800,000
3.5U
4U
3.4U
3.7U
3.6U
3.6U
3.8U
20U
4.1 U
4.1 U
3.6U
3.9U
-
3.2 U
3.8 U
3.2 U
3.5 U
3.3 U
3.3 U
3.6 U
18 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
3.4 U
3.6 U
12,000
2.4U
2.8U
2.4U
2.6U
2.5U
2.5U
2.6U
14U
2.8U
2.8U
2.5U
2.7U
-
19 U
22 U
19 U
20 U
19 U
20 U
21 U
110 U
22 U
22 U
20 U
21 U
62,000,000
40 U
46 U
39 U
42 U
41 U
41 U
43 U
220 U
47 U
47 U
41 U
44 U
160,000
12 U
14 U
12 U
13 U
12 U
12 U
13 U
68 U
14 U
14 U
13 U
13 U
1,800,000
9.5U
11 U
9.4U
10U
9.8U
9.8U
10U
54U
11 U
11 U
10U
11 U
12,000,000
49 U
57 U
48 U
53 U
50 U
50 U
54 U
280 U
58 U
58 U
51 U
55 U
1,200,000
63 U
74 U
63 U
68 U
65 U
65 U
70 U
360 U
75 U
75 U
66 U
71 U
5.500
28 U
33 U
28 U
30 U
29 U
29 U
31 U
160 U
33 U
33 U
29 U
31 U
620,000
44 U
52 U
44 U
48 U
46 U -
46 U
49 U
250 U
53 U
52 U
46 U
50 U
82,000.000
12 U
14 U
12 U
13 U
12 U
13 U
13 U
69 U
14 U
14 U
13 U
14 U
5,100,000
9.2U
11 U
9.1 U
9.9U
9.5U
9.5U
10U
52U
11 U
11 U
9.7U
10U
4,100,000
2.2 U
2.6 U
2.2 U
2.4 U
2.3 U
2.3 U
2.4 U
12 U
2.6 U
2.6 U
2.3 U
2.5 U
-
5.6U
6.5U
5.5U
6U
5.7U
5.7U
6.1 U
32U
6.6U
6.6U
5.8U
6.2U
6,000,000
58 U
68 U
58 U
62 U
60 U
60 U
64 U
330 U
69 U
68 U
61 U
65 U
-
8.3U
9.6U
8.2U
8.9U
8.5U
8.5U
9.1 U
47U
9.8U
9.8U
8.7U
9.3U
3,800
160 U
180 U
160 U
170 U
160 U
160 U
170 U
900 U
190 U
190 U
170 U
180 U
-
42 U
48 U
41 U
45 U
43 U
43 U
46 U
240 U
49 U
49 U
44 U
47 U
-
63 U
73 U
62 U
67 U
64 U
65 U
69 U
360 U
74 U
74 U
66 U
70 U
-
58 U
67 U
57 U
62 U
59 U
59 U
63 U
330 U
68 U
68 U
60 U
65 U
-
7.5U
8.7U
7.4U
8U
7.7U
7.7U
8.2U
42U
8.9U
8.8U
7.8U
8.3U
-
53 U
62 U
53 U
57 U
55 U
55 U
58 U
300 U
63 U
63 U
56 U
60 U
-
3.9U
4.5U
3.8U
4.2U
4U
4U
4.2U
22U
4.6U
4.6U
4.1 U
4.3U
-
10U
12U
10U
11 U
10U
10U
11 U
57 U
12U
12U
11 U
11 U
86,000
20 U
24 U
20 U
22 U
21 U
21 U
22 U
120 U
24 U
24 U
21 U
23 U
-
44 U
51 U
43 U
47 U
45 U
45 U
48 U
250 U
52 U
52 U
46 U
49 U
33,000.000
2.1U
2.5U
2.1U
2.3U
2.2U
2.2U
2-3U
1801
2.5U
2.5U
21J
2.4U
-
1.5 U
1.7 U
1.5 U
1.6 U
1.5 U
1.5 U
1.6 U
8.4 U
1.8 U
1.7 U
1.6 U
1.7 U
170,000,000
4.6 U
5.4 U
11 J -
5 U
4.8 U
4.8 U
5.1 U
550 J
5.5 U
5.5 U
76 J
5.2 U
2,100
17J
3.6U
95J
3.4U
3.2U
3.2U
3.4U
2000
3.7U
3.7 U
490
3.5U
210
21 J
5.1 U
150J
4.7U
4.5U
4.5U
4.8U
2200
5.2U
5.1 U
540
4.9U
2,100
28 J
4.1 U
210
3.8 U
13 J
3.6 U
3.9 U
2600
4.2 U
4.1 U
630
3.9 U
-
20J
2.5U
1601
2.3U
2.2U
2.2U
2.4U
1600
2.6U
2.6U
430
2.4U
21,000
13J
2.3U
911
2.1U
2U
2.1U
2.2U
1200
2.4U
24U
280
2.2U
-
260 U
300 U
260 U
280 U
270 U
270 U
290 U
1500 U
310 U
310 U
270 U
290 U
62,000,000
8.7U
10U
8.6U
9.3U
8.9U
8.9U
9.5U
49U
10U
10U
9.1 U
9.7U
1,800,000
9.9 U
11 U
9.8 U
11 U
10 U
10 U
11 U
56 U
12 U
12 U
10 U
11 U
1,000
16 U
18 U
15 U
17 U
16 U
16 U
17 U
89 U
19 U
18 U
16 U
18 U
120,000
58 U
68 U
58 U
63 U
60 U
60 U
64 U
330 U
69 U
69 U
75 J
65 U
910.000
49 U
57 U
48 U
52 U
50 U
50 U
53 U
280 U
58 U
57 U
51 U
54 U
210,000
22 J
2.1 U
160 J
1.9 U
1.9 U
1.9 U
2 U
2500
16 J
2.1 U
570
2 U
210
2.1U
2.5U
28J
2.3U
2.2U
2.2U
2.3U
300J
2.5U
2.5U
79J
2.4U
1,000,000
1.9U
2.2U
1.9U
2U
1.9U
1.9U
2.1 U
11 U
2.2U
2.2U
2U
2.1 U
490,000,000
5.5U
6.4U
5.4U
5.9U
5.6U
5.6U
6U
31 U
6.5U
6.5U
5.7U
6.1 U
-
4.7U
5.5U
4.7U
5.1 U
4.9U
4.9U
5.2U
27U
5.6U
5.6U
5U
5.3U
-
63 U
73 U
62 U
67 U
64 U
65 U
69 U
360 U
74 U
74 U
66 U
70 U
-
4.2U
4.9U
4.2U
4.6U
4.4U
4.4U
4.6U
24U
5U
5U
4.4U
4.7U
22,000,000
40 J
3.1 U
320
2.8 U
24 J
16 J
2.9 U
6100
36 J
3.1 U
1200
2.9 U
22,000.000
4.2U
4.9U
4.1 U
4.5U
4.3U
4.3U
4.6U
230J
5U
4.9U
25J
4.7 U
1,100
9 U
10 U
8.9 U
9.7 U
9.2 U
9.3 U
9.9 U
51 U
11 U
11 U
9.4 U
10 U
22,000
9.3U
11 U
9.2U
10U
9.5U
9.6U
10U
53U
11 U
11 U
9.7U
10U
3.700,000
55 U
64 U
54 U
59 U
56 U
56 U
60 U
310 U
65 U
65 U
57 U
61 U
120,000
14 U
16 U
14 U
15 U
14 U
14 U
15 U
80 U
17 U
17 U
15 U
16 U
2,100
18J
5.8U
130J
5.4U
5.1 U
5.2U
5.5U
1400
6U
5.9U
330
5.6U
1,800,000
9.1 U
11 U
9U
9.7U
9.3U
9.3U
9.9U
51 U
11 U
11 U
9.5U
10U
18,000
3U
3.5U
3U
3.2U
3.1 U
3.1 U
3.3U
17U
3.6U
3.6U
3.2U
3.4U
24.000
8U
9.3U
7.9U
8.6U
8.2U
8.3U
8.8U
46U
9.5U
9.5U
8.4U
9U
250
14 U
17 U
14 U
15 U
15 U
15 U
16 U
82 U
17 U
17 U
15 U
16 U
350,000
9.9 U
12 U
9.8 U
11 U
10 U
10 U
11 U
56 U
12 U
12 U
10 U
11 U
9,000
62 U
72 U
61 U
67 U
64 U
64 U
68 U
350 U
74 U
73 U
65 U
70 U
-
16J
4.4U
1001
4.1 U
3.9U
3.9U
4.2U
3300
4.5U
4.5U
460
4.3U
180,000,000
19 U
22 U
19 U
21 U
20 U
20 U
21 U
110 U
23 U
22 U
20 U
21 U
17,000,000
32 J
1.4 U
260
1.3 U
18 J
13 J
1.3 U
4600
30 J
1.4 U
950
1.3 U
Screening Level
criteria are shaded.
bove the indicated reporting limit.
3d due to one or more duality control parameters.
eml-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
99,000
5.4 U
5.7 U
5.2 U
5.3 U
6.5 U
5.1 U
6 U
6.4 U
6.2 U
6.1 U
6.2 U
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
9,800,000
3.6 U
3.8 U
3.5 U
3.6 U
4.3 U
3.4 U
4 U
4.3 U
4.2 U
4.1 U
4.2 U
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
-
3.4 U
3.6 U
3.2 U
3.3 U
4 U
3.2 U
3.8 U
4 U
3.9 U
3.8 U
3.9 U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
12,000
2.5 U
2.6 U
2.4 U
2.4 U
3 U
2.3 U
2.8 U
3 U
2.9 U
2.8 U
2.9 U
2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane)
-
20 U
21 U
19 U
19 U
24 U
18 U
22 U
23 U
23 U
22 U
23 U
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
62,000,000
41 U
43 U
40 U
41 U
49 U
39 U
46 U
49 U
47 U
47 U
47 U
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
160,000
12 U
13 U
12 U
12 U
15 U
12 U
14 U
15 U
14 U
14 U
14 U
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,800,000
9.9 U
IOU
9.5 U
9.7 U
12 U
9.3 U
11 U
12 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
2,4-Dimethylphenol
12,000,000
51 U
54 U
49 U
50 U
61 U
48 U
57 U
61 U
59 U
58 U
59 U
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1,200,000
66 U
70 U
63 U
65 U
79 U
62 U
74 U
78 U
76 U
75 U
76 U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
5,500
29 U
31 U
28 U
29 U
35 U
27 U
33 U
35 U
34 U
33 U
34 U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
620,000
46 U
49 U
44 U
45 U
55 U
43 U
51 U
55 U
53 U
52 U
53 U
2 Chbronaphthalene
82,000,000
13 U
13 U
12 U
12 U
15 U
12 U
14 U
15 U
15 U
14 U
15 U
2-Chbrophenol
5,100,000
9.6 U
IOU
9.2 U
9.5 U
12 U
9 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
2-Methylnaphthalene
4,100,000
2.3 U
2.4 U
2.2 U
2.3 U
2.7 U
2.1 U
2.5 U
2.7 U
2.6 U
2.6 U
2.6 U
2-Methylphenol
-
5.8 U
6.1 U
5.6 U
5.7 U
7 U
5.4 U
6.5 U
6.9 U
6.7 U
6.6 U
6.7 U
2-Nitroaniline
6,000,000
60 U
64 U
58 U
60 U
73 U
57 U
68 U
72 U
70 U
69 U
70 U
2-Nitrophenol
-
8.6U
9.1U
8.3U
8.5U
10U
8.1U
9.6U
10U
9.9U
9.8U
9.9U
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
3,800
170 U
170 U
160 U
160 U
200 U
150 U
180 U
200 U
190 U
190 U
190 U
3-Nitroaniline
-
43 U
46 U
42 U
43 U
52 U
41 U
48 U
52 U
50 U
49 U
50 U
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
-
65 U
69 U
63 U
64 U
'. 78 U
61 U
73 U
77 U '..
75 U
74 U
75 U
4 Bromophenylphenylether
60 U
63 U
58 U
59 U
72 U
56 U
67 U
71 U
69 U
68 U
69 U
4-Chloro3-methylphenol
7.8 U
8.2 U
7.5 U
7.6 U
9.3 U
7.3 U
8.7 U
9.2 U
8.9 U
8.8 U
8.9 U
4-Chloroaniline
55 U
58 U
53 U
55 U
66 U
52 U
62 U
66 U
64 U
63 U
64 U
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
-
4 U
4.2 U
3.9 U
4 U
4.8 U
3.8 U
4.5 U
4.8 U
4.6 U
4.6 U
4.6 U
4-Methylphenol
-
IOU
11 U
IOU
10 U
13 U
9.8 U
12 U
12 U
12 U
12 U
12 U
4-Nitroaniline
86,000
21 U
22 U
20 U
21 U
25 U
20 U
24 U
25 U
24 U
24 U
24 U
4-Nitrophenol
-
46 U
48 U
44 U
45 U
55 U
43 U
51 U
54 U
53 U
52 U
53 U
Acenaphthene
33,000,000
2.2 U
2.3 U
2.1 U
2.2 U
2.7 U
2.1 UI,
2.5 U
2.6 U
2.6 U
2.5 U
2.6 U
Acenaphthylene
-
1.5 U
1.6 U
1.5 U
1.5 U
i 1.9 U
1.4 U
1.7 U
1.8 U
1.8 U
1.7 U
1.8 U
Anthracene
170,000,000
4.8 U
5.1 U
4.6 U
4.8 U
5.8 U
4.5 U
5.4 U
33 J
5.6 U
5.5 U
5.6 U
Senzo(a)anthracene
2,100
3.3 U
3.4 U (
3.1 U
30 J
3.9 U
31 J
3.6 U
270
3.7 U
3.7 U
3.8 U
Benzo(a)pyrene
210
4.5 U
4.8 U
4.4 U
43 J
5.5 U
37 J
5.1 U
330
52 U
52 U
5.2 U
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
2,100
37 U
3.9 U
3.5 U
53 J
4.4 U
52 J
4.1 U
480
4.2 U
4.1 U
4.2 U
Benzo(ghi)perylene
-
2.3 U
2.4 U
2.2 U
36 J
2.7 U
31 J
2.5 U
280
2.6 U
2.6 U
2.6 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
21,000
2.1 U
2.2 U
2 U
26 J
2.5 U
22 J
2.3 U
120 J
2.4 U
2.4 U
2.4 U
Benzoic acid
-
270 U
290 U
260 U
270 U
330 U
250 U
300 U
320 U
310 U
310 U
310 U
Benzyl alcohol
62,000,000
9 U '�,
9.5 U
8.7 U
8.9 U
11 U
8.4 U
10 U
11 U
IOU
IOU
10 U
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
1,800.000
10 U
11 U
9.9 U
IOU
12 U
9.6 U
11 U
12 U
12 U
12 U
12 U
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
1,000
16 U
17 U
16 U
16 U
20 U
15 U
18 U
19 U
19 U
18 U
19 U
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
120,000
61 U
64 U
58 U
60 U
73 U
57 U
68 U
72 U i
70 U
69 U
70 U
Butyl benzyl phthalate
910,000
51 U
53 U
49 U
50 U
61 U
47 U
57 U
60 U
58 U
57 U
58 U
Chrysene
210,000
1.9 U
2 U
1.8 U
48 J
2.3 U
42 J
2.1 U
370
2.2 U
2.1 U
2.2 U
Dibehz(a,h)anthracene
210
2.2 U
2.3 U
2.1 U
2.2 U
2.7 U
2.1 U
2.5 U
60 J
2.6 U
2.5 U
2.6 U
Dibenzofuran
1,000,000
2 U
2.1 U
1.9 U
1.9 U
2.4 U
1.8 U
2.2 U
2.3 U
2.3 U
2.2 U
2.3 U
Diethyl phthalate
490,000,000
5.7 U
6 U
5.5 U
5.6 U
6.8 U
5.3 U
6.4 U
6.8 U
6.6 U
6.5 U
6.6 U
Dimethyl phthalate
-
4.9 U
5.2 U
4.7 U
4.8 U
5.9 U
4.6 U
5.5 U
5.8 U
5.7 U
5.6 U
5.7 U
Di n butyl phthalate
65 U
69 U
63 U
64 U
78 U
61 U
73 U
78 U
75_ U
74 U
75 U
Di-n-octyl phthalate
-
4.4 U
4.7 U
4.2 U
4.3 U
5.3 U
4.1 U
4.9 U
5.2 U
5.1 U
5 U
5.1 U
Fluoranthene
22,000,000
2.7 U
2.9 U
2.6 U
82 J
3.3 U
89 J
3 U
860
3.1 U
3.1 U
3.1 U
Fluorene
22,000,000
4.3 U
4.6 U
4.2 U
4.3 U
5.2 U
4.1 U',
4.8 U
5.2 U'..
5 U
4.9 U
5 U
Hexachlorobenzene
1,100
9.4 U
9.9 U
9 U
9.2 U
11 U
8.8 U
10 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
Hexachlorobutadiene
22,000
9.6 U
IOU
9.3 U
9.5 U
12 U
9 U
11 U
11 U i
11 U
11 U
11 U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
3,700,000
57 U
60 U
55 U
56 U
68 U
53 U
64 U
68 U
66 U
65 U
66 U
Hexachloroethane
120,000
15 U
15 U
14 U
14 U
18 U
14 U
16 U
17 U
17 U
17 U
17 U
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
2,100
5.2 U
5.5 U
5 U
33 J
6.3 U
26 J
5.8 U
230
6 U
5.9 U
6 U
Isophorone
1.800,000
9.4 U
IOU
9.1 U
9.3 U
11 U
8.8 U
- it U
11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
Naphthalene
18,000
3.1 U
3.3 U -
3 U
3.1 U
3.8 U
2.9 U
3.5 U
3.7 U
3.6 U
3.6 U
3.6 U
Nitrobenzene
24,000
8.4 U
8.8 U
8 U
8.2 U
10 U
7.8 U
9.3 U
9.9 U
9.6 U
9.5 U
9.6 U
N-Ndrosodi-n-propylamine
250
15 U
16 U
14 U
15 U
IOU
14 U
17 U
18 U
17 U
17 U
17 U
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
350,000
10 U
11 U
9.9 U
IOU
12 U
9.7 U
12 U
12 U
12 U
12 U
12 U
Pentachlorophenoi
9,000
65 U
68 U
62 U
64 U
78 U
61 U
72 U
77 U
74 U
73 U
75 U
Phenanthrene
-
4 U
4.2 U
3.8 U
28 J
4.7 U
36 J
4.4 U
370 -
4.6 U
4.5 U
4.6 U
Phenol
180,000,000
20 U
21 U
19 U
20 U
24 U
19 U
22 U
24 U
23 U
22 U
23 U
Pyrene
17,000,000
1.2 U
1.3 U
1.2 U
65 J
1.5 U
68 J
1.4 U
640
1.4 U
1.4 U
1.4 U
RSL - USEPA Region 9 Risk -Based Screening Level
Results that exceed state or federal criteria are shaded.
ug/kg - micrograms per kilogram
U - The analyte was not detected above the indicated reporting limit.
J - Estimated. The result is estimated due to one or more ouallty control
USEPA Industrial
Soil RSL
(0" - 6")
(�' $')
(0" - 6")
(3' - 4')
(0" - 6„)
(0„ - 6")
(8' - 10')
(0" - 6")
(T 8')
(7' - 8')
(0„ - 6„)
unds (ug/kg)
38,000,000
0.57 U
0.4 U
0.4 U
0.35 U
0.5 U
0.39 U
0.36 U
0.46 U
0.55 U
0.38 U
0.39 U
ne
2,800
1.3U
0.89U
0.9U
0.79U
1.1 U
0.87U
0.8U
1 U
1.2U
0.86U
0.87U
5,300
1 U
0.72 U
0.72 U
0.63 U
0.89 U
0.7 U
0.64 U
0.81 U
0.98 U
0.69 U
0.69 U
thane
180,000,000
1.8 U
1.3 U
1.3 U
1.1 U
1.6 U
1.2 U
1.1 U
1.4 U
1.7 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
17,000
0.96 U
0.67 U
0.68 U
0.59 U
0.84 U
0.65 U
0.6 U
0.76 U
0.92 U
0.65 U
0.65 U
1,100,000
0.96 U
0.67 U
0.68 U
0.59 U
0.84 U
0.66 U
0.61 U
0.77 U
0.92 U
0.65 U
0.65 U
99,000
0.48 U
0.34 U
0.34 U
0.29 U
0.42 U
0.33 U
0.3 U
0.38 U
0.46 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
opane
69
3.9U
2.8U
2.8U
2.4U
3.4U
2.7U
2.5U
3.1 U
3.8U
2.6U
2.7U
170
1 U
0.71 U
0.71 U
0.62 U
0.88 U
0.69 U
0.64 U
0.8 U
0.97 U
0.68 U
0.69 U
9,800,000
0.61 U
0.43 U
0.44 U
0.38 U
0.54 U
0.42 U
0.39 U
0.49 U
0.59 U
0.41 U
0.42 U
2,200
0.39 U
0.28 U
0.28 U
0.24 U
0.34 U
0.27 U
0.25 U
0.31 U
0.38 U
0.27 U
0.27 U
al
2,200
4.1 U
2.9 U
2.9 U
2.5 U
3.6 U
2.8 U
2.6 U
3.3 U
3.9 U
2.8 U
2.8 U
4,500
3.9 U
2.8 U
2.8 U
2.4 U
3.4 U
2.7 U
2.5 U
3.1 U
3.8 U
2.6 U
2.7 U
-
0.4U
0.28U
0.29U
0.25U
0.35U
0.28U
0.25U
0.32U
0.39U
0.27U
0.27U
12,000
1.1 U
0.77 U
0.78 U
0.68 U
0.96 U
0.75 U
0.69 U
0.88 U
1.1 U
0.74 U
0.75 U
200,000,000
11 J
2U
2U
1.8U
2.5U
2U
1.8U
2.3U
2.8U
1.9U
2U
1,400,000
3.9 U
2.8 U
2.8 U
2.4 U
3.4 U
2.7 U
2.5 U
3.1 U
3.8 U
2.6 U
2.7 U
MIBK)
53,000,000
2.6 U
1.8 U
1.8 U
1.6 U
2.2 U
1.8 U
1.6 U
2.1 U
2.5 U
1.7 U
1.8 U
630,000,000
300 B
4.6 U
4.7 U
4.1 U
5.8 U
9.5 J
4.2 U
5.3 U
14 J
4.5 U
4.5 U
5,400
0.38 U
0.27 U
0.27 U
0.24 U
0.34 U
0.26 U
0.24 U
0.31 U
0.37 U
0.26 U
0.26 U
1,400
1 U
0.74 U
0.75 U
0.65 U
0.92 U
0.72 U
0.66 U
0.84 U
1 U
0.71 U
0.72 U
220,000
3.9U
2.8U
2.8U
2.4U
3.4U
2.7U
2.5U
3.1U
3.8U
2.6U
2.7U
32,000
0.7U
0.5U
0.5U
0.44U
0.62U
0.48U
0.45U
0.56U
0.68U
0.48U
0.48U
3,700,000
3.9U
2.8U
2.8U
2.4U
3.4U
2.7U
2.5U
3.1U
3.8U
2.6U
2.7U
3,000
0.76 U
0.53 U
0.54 U
0.47 U
0.66 U
0.52 U
0.48 U
0.61 U
0.73 U
0.51 U
0.52 U
1,400,000
1 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.64 U
0.9 U
0.71 U
0.65 U
0.83 U
0.99 U
0.7 U
0.71 U
3,300
1 U
0.71 U
0.71 U
0.62 U
0.88 U
0.69 U
0.63 U
0.8 U
0.96 U
0.68 U
0.68 U
1,500
1.8 U
1.2 U
1.3 U
1.1 U
1.5 U
1.2 U
1.1 U
1.4 U
1.7 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
1,500
0.48 U
0.34 U
0.34 U
0.3 U
0.42 U
0.33 U
0.31 U
0.39 U
0.47 U
0.33 U
0.33 U
500,000
0.47 U
0.33 U
0.34 U
0.29 U
0.41 U
0.32 U
0.3 U
0.38 U
0.45 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
10,000,000
1 U
0.71 U
0.71 U
0.62 U
0.88 U
0.69 U
0.63 U
0.8 U
0.96 U
0.68 U
0.68 U
8,100
1.1 U
0.79U
0.8U
0.7U
0.99U
0.77U
0.71 U
0.9U
1.1 U
0.76U
0.77U
29,000,000
1.1 U
0.77 U
0.78 U
0.68 U
0.96 U
0.75 U
0.69 U
0.88 U
1.1 U
0.74 U
0.75 U
780
0.65 U
0.46 U
0.46 U
0.4 U
0.57 U
0.44 U
0.41 U
0.52 U
0.62 U
0.44 U
0.44 U
27,000
0.54 U
0.38 U
0.38 U
0.33 U
0.47 U
0.37 U
0.34 U
0.43 U
0.52 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
11,000,000
1.2 U
0.83 U
0.84 U
0.73 U
1 U
0.81 U
0.75 U
0.95 U
1.1 U
0.8 U
0.81 U
1,000,000,000
1.5 U
1 U
1 U
0.9 U
1.3 U
1 U
0.92 U
1.2 U
1.4 U
0.98 U
0.99 U
220,000
0.77 U
0.54 U
0.55 U
0.48 U
0.67 U
0.53 U
0.49 U
0.62 U
0.74 U
0.52 U
0.52 U
-
1.2U
0.84U
0.85U
0.74U
1U
0.81U
0.75U
0.95U
1.1U
0.8U
0.81U
53,000
3.6U
2.5U
2.6U
2.2U
3.2U
13B
2.3U
2.9U
17B
2.4U
2.5U
36,000,000
0.39 U
0.28 U
0.28 U
0.24 U
0.34 U
0.27 U
0.25 U
0.31 U
0.38 U
0.26 U
0.27 U
2,600
1.1 U
0.74 U
0.75 U
0.65 U
0.92 U
0.72 U
0.66 U
0.84 U
1 U
0.71 U
0.72 U
45,000,000
0.59 U
0.42 U
0.42 U
0.37 U
0.52 U
0.41 U
0.37 U
0.47 U
0.57 U
0.4 U
0.4 U
e
690,000
0.81 U
0.57 U
0.57 U
0.5 U
0.71 U
0.55 U
0.51 U
0.65 U
0.78 U
0.55 U
0.55 U
ne
3.4 U
2.4 U
2.4 U
2.1 U
3 U
2.4 U
2.2 U
2.8 U
3.3 U
2.3 U
2.4 U
14,000
1.7 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
1.1 U
1.5 U
1.2 U
1.1 U
1.4 U
1.7 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
3,400,000
0.74 U
0.52 U
0.53 U
0.46 U
0.65 U
0.51 U
0.47 U
0.59 U
0.71 U
0.5 U
0.51 U
1,700
0.96 U
0.67 U
0.68 U
0.59 U
0.84 U
0.65 U
0.6 U
0.76 U
0.92 U
0.65 U
0.65 U
53,000,000
1.3 U
0.93 U
0.94 U
0.81 U
1.2 U
0.9 U
0.83 U
1.1 U
1.3 U
0.89 U
0.9 U
Risk -Based Screening Level
to or federal criteria are shaded.
kilogram
t detected above the indicated reporting limit.
ilt is estimated due to one or more quality control parameters.
d in the associated Method Blank.
USEPA Industrial
Soil RSL
(0" - 6") (4' - 5')
(0" - 6") (5' - 7') (5' T)
(0" - 6") (4' - 6')
(0" - 6") (6' - 8')
(0" - 6")
(6' - 8')
(1
(ug/kg)
38,000,000
0,39 U 0.34 U
0.4 U 0.35 U 0.32 U
0.38 U 0.36 U
0.5 U 0.34 U
0.44 U
0.38 U
l
2,800
0.87U 0.76U
0.89U 0.78U 0.71 U
0.86U 0.81 U
1.1U 0.76U
0.97U
0.84U
5,300
0.7U 0.61 U
0.71 U 0.63U 0.57U
0.69U 0.65U
0.89U 0.61U
0.78U
0.67U
180,000,000
1.2U 1.1U
1.2U 1.1U 1U
1.2U 1.1U
1.6U 1.1U
1.4U
1.2U
17,000
0.66 U 0.57 U
0.67 U 0.59 U 0.54 U
0.65 U 0.61 U
0.84 U 0.57 U
0.73 U
0.63 U
l
1,100,000
0.66 U 0.57 U
0.67 U 0.59 U 0.54 U
0.65 U 0.61 U
0.84 U 0.57 U
0.74 U
0.63 U
99,000
0.33 U 0.28 U
0.33 U 0.29 U 0.27 U
0.32 U 0.3 U
0.42 U 0.29 U
0.37 U
0.32 U
69
2.7U 2.3U
2.7U 2.4U 2.2U
2.7U 2.5U
3.4U 2.3U
3U
2.6U
170
0.69U 0.6U
0.7U 0.62U 0.56U
0.68U 0.64U
0.88U 0.6U
0.77U
0.67U
1
9,800.000
0.42 U 0.36 U
0.43 U 0.38 U 0.34 U
0.41 U 0.39 U
0.54 U 0.37 U
0.47 U
0.41 U
1
2,200
0.27 U 0.23 U
0.27 U 0.24 U 0.22 U
0.27 U 0.25 U
0.35 U 0.24 U
0.3 U
0.26 U
l
2,200
2.8U 2.4U
2.9U 2.5U 2.3U
2.8U 2.6U
3.6U 2.5U
3.1U
2.7U
4,500
2.7U 2.3U
2.7U 2.4U 2.2U
2.7U 2.5U
3.4U 2.3U
3U
2.6U
-
0.28U 0.24U
0.28U 0.25U 0.23U
0.27U 0.26U
0.35U 0.24U
0.31U
0.27U
l
12,000
0.75 U 0.65 U
0.77 U 0.68 U 0.61 U
0.74 U 0.7 U
0.96 U 0.66 U
0.84 U
0.73 U
l
200,000,000
2U 1.7U
2U 1.8U 1.6U
1.9U 1.8U
5.7J 1.7U
2.2U
1.9U
1,400,000
2.7U 2.3U
2.7U 2.4U 2.2U
2.7U 2.5U
3.4U 2.3U
3U
2.6U
53,000,000
1.8U 1.5U
1.8U 1.6U 1.4U
1.7U 1.6U
2.3U 1.5U
2U
1.7U
630,000,000
4.5 U 5.4 J
5.2 J 4.1 U 5.1 J
4.5 U 5.2 J
160 B 4 U
5.1 U
20 J
5,400
0.26 U 0.23 U
0.27 U 0.24 U 0.22 U
0.26 U 0.25 U
0.34 U 0.23 U
0.29 U
0.25 U
1,400
0.72 U 0.62 U
0.73 U 0.65 U 0.59 U
0.71 U 0.67 U
0.92 U 0.63 U
0.81 U
0.69 U
1
220,000
2.7U 2.3U
2.7U 2.4U 2.2U
2.7U 2.5U
3.4U 2.3U
3U
2.6U
32,000
0.48 U 0.42 U
0.49 U 0.44 U 0.39 U
0.48 U 0.45 U
0.62 U 0.42 U
0.54 U
0.47 U
l
3,700,000
2.7U 2.3U
2.7U 2.4U 2.2U
2.7U 2.5U
3.4U 2.3U
3U
2.6U
3,000
0.52 U 0.45 U
0.53 U 0.47 U 0.42 U
0.51 U 0.49 U
0.67 U 0.45 U
0.58 U
0.5 U
1
1,400,000
0.71 U 0.61 U
0.72 U 0.64 U 0.58 U
0.7 U 0.66 U
0.91 U 0.62 U
0.79 U
0.68 U
3,300
0.69U 0.6U
0.7U 0.62U 0.56U
0.68U 0.64U
0.88U 0.6U
0.77U
0.66U
l
1,500
1.2U 1.1 U
1.2U 1.1 U 0.99U
1.2U 1.1 U
1.6U 1.1U
1.4U
1.2U
1,500
0.33 U 0.29 U
0.34 U 0.3 U 0.27 U
0.33 U 0.31 U
0.43 U 0.29 U
0.37 U
0.32 U
1
500,000
0.32 U 0.28 U
0.33 U 0.29 U 0.27 U
0.32 U 0.3 U
0.42 U 0.28 U
0.36 U
0.31 U
l
10,000,000
0.69 U 0.6 U
0.7 U 0.62 U 0.56 U
0.68 U 0.64 U
0.88 U 0.6 U
0.77 U
0.66 U
t
8,100
0.77 U 0.67 U
0.79 U 0.7 U 0.63 U
0.76 U 0.72 U
0.99 U 0.68 U
0.87 U
0.75 U
29,000,000
0.75 U 0.65 U
0.77 U 0.68 U 0.61 U
0.74 U 0.7 U
0.96 U 0.66 U
0.84 U
0.73 U
780
0.44U 0.38U
0.45U 0.4U 0.36U
0.44U 0.41U
0.57U 0.39U
0.5U
0.43U
27,000
0.37 U 0.32 U
0.38 U 0.33 U 0.3 U
0.37 U 0.35 U
0.47 U 0.32 U
0.41 U
0.36 U
l
11,000,000
0.81 U 0.7 U
0.82 U 0.73 U 0.66 U
0.8 U 0.76 U
1 U 0.71 U
0.91 U
0.78 U
l
1,000,000,000
1 U 0.87 U
1 U 0.9 U 0.82 U
0.99 U 0.93 U
1.3 U 0.87 U
1.1 U
0.96 U
220,000
0.53 U 0.46 U
0.54 U 0.47 U 0.43 U
0.52 U 0.49 U
0.68 U 0.46 U
0.59 U
0.51 U
-
0.82U 0.71U
0.83U 0.73U 0.67U
0.81U 0.76U
1U 0.71U
0.91U
0.79U
53,000
2.5U 2.2J,8
2.5U 2.2U 2U
2.4U 2.3U
3.2U 2.2U
2.8U
2.4U
36,000,000
0.27 U 0.23 U
0.27 U 0.24 U 0.22 U
0.27 U 0.25 U
0.34 U 0.23 U
0.3 U
0.26 U
2,600
0.72 U 0.62 U
0.73 U 0.65 U 0.59 U
0.71 U 0.67 U
0.92 U 0.63 U
0.81 U
0.7 U
l
45.000,000
0.41 U 0.35 U
0.41 U 0.37 U 0.33 U
0.4 U 0.38 U
0.52 U 0.35 U
0.45 U
0.39 U
l
690,000
0.55 U 0.48 U
0.56 U 0.5 U 0.45 U
0.55 U 0.52 U
0.71 U 0.48 U
0.62 U
0.53 U
2.4 U 2 U
2.4 U 2.1 U 1.9 U
2.3 U 2.2 U
3 U 2.1 U
2.6 U
2.3 U
14,000
1.2U 1U
1.2U 1.1U 0.97U
1.2U 1.1U
1.5U IU
1.3U
1.1U
3,400,000
0.51 U 0.44 U
0.52 U 0.46 U 0.42 U
0.5 U 0.47 U
0.65 U 0.44 U
0.57 U
0.49 U
1,700
0.66 U 0.57 U
0.67 U 0.59 U 0.54 U
0.65 U 0.61 U
0.84 U 0.57 U
0.73 U
0.63 U
l
53,000,000
0.9 U 0.78 U
0.92 U 0.81 U 0.74 U
0.89 U 0.84 U
1.2 U 0.79 U
1 U
0.87 U
3ased Screening Level
�deral criteria are shaded.
ted above the indicated reporting limit.
timated due to one or more quality Conti
e associated Method Blank.
USEPA Industrial
Soil RSL
(0" 6")
(7' - 8')
(0" 6")
(3' - 4')
(0„ - 6„)
(0" 6")
(8' - 10')
(0" 6")
(7' - 8')
(7' - 8')
(0„ - 6")
990,000
5830
2990
4370
3170
6780 LCV
6750 LCV
5630 LCV
4280 LCV
3420 LCV
5870 LCV
5670 LCV
410
0.6 U
0.7 U
0.5 U
0.7 U
0.6 U
0.6 U
0.7 U
0.6 U
0.7 U
0.7 U
0.6 U
1.6
3.4
1.8 J
2.6
2.2 J
3.4
3
3.1 :
2.9
2.5
3
4.5
190,000
22.1
11.5
12.9
8.18
24.6 LCV, B
26.1 LCV, B
21.3 LCV, B
21.3 LCV, B
11.9 LCV, B
28.5 LCV, B
25.1 LCV, B
2,000
0.138 J
0.05 J
0.1 J
0.059 J
0.188 J
0.182 J
0.146 J
0.163 J
0.074 J
0.128 J
0.157 J
800
0.071 LCV, J
0.037 U, LCV
0.03 U, LCV
0.036 U, LCV
0.032 U
0.033 U
0.038 U
0.036 U
0.036 U
0.04 U
0.032 U
-
237
850
860
1100
1360 B
1410 B
1570 B
2530 B
1450 B
1240 B
5400 B
-
6.89
6.9
7.61
5.29
11.5
11.1
9.59
7.76
5.92
7.6
9.35
300
2.79
2.45
5.5
4.26
4.72
4.77
4.83
3.14
4.43
6.43
5.26
41,000
4.3
4.2
9.2
7.1
10.9E
11.1B
9.58
6.3B
7.1B
12.1B
15.4B
720,000
9160
6080
8290
6560
12100 B
111006
10500 B
8020 B
7680 B
10200 B
11100 B
800
12.8
2.2
2.6
2.4
4.1 LCV
4.2 LCV
3.6 LCV
6.7 LCV
2A LCV
3.5 LCV
17.2 LCV
-
1040
1410
1680
1480
2400
2340
2100
1690
1680
2120
2400
23,000
218
94.5
279
217
184 B
184 B
224 B
168 B
221 B
321 B
278 B
-
7.43
7.85
10.9
12
13.6
13.3
13.1
7.69
11.5
14
12.7
-
1" B
348 B
339 B
337 B
733
799
665
532
393
766
529
5,100
0.5 J
0.5 U
0.4 U
0.5 U
0.4 U
0.4 U
0.5 U
0.5 U
0.5 U
0.5 U
0.4 U
5,100
0.077 U
0.087 U
0.071 U
0.085 U
0.075 U
0.076 U
0.089 U
0.083 U
0.084 U
0.092 U
0.075 U
-
23.5J
61.5J
38.1 J
31.3J
54.6J,B
69.1 J,B
58.6J,B
90.3J.6
98.2J.B
97.7J,B
67.8J,B
0.3 U
0.4 U
0.3 U
0.4 U
0.3 U
0.5 J
0.5 J
0.4 U
0.4 U
0.6 J
0.4 J
-
9.12
5.83
7.47
5.04
12.4
11.7
9.38
7.95
5.58
8.46
8.72
310,000
22.4E
12B
15.2E
13.48
23.8B
24.2E
22.9E
26.2B
16B
22.6E
41.4E
34
0.312 LCV
0.0106 U, LCV
0.0089 U. LCV
0.0094 U, LCV
0.0086 U, LCV
0.0087 U, LCV
0.0094 U, LCV
0.0347 LCV
0.0098 U, LCV
0.0101 U, LCV
0.0364 LCV
9 Risk -Based Screening Level
ate or federal criteria are shaded.
kilogram (ppm)
)t detected above the indicated reporting limit.
ud is estimated due to one or more quality control parameters.
ed in the associated Method Blank.
Verification exhibited results outside the project established
standard quality control limits.
USLPA Industrial
Soil RSL
(0" - 6")
(4, - 5')
(0„ - 6")
(5, - 7')
(5' - 7')
(0„ 6")
(4, _ 6.)
(0„ - 6")
(6, - 8.)
(0" 6")
(6, - 8')
(0
990,000
6860 LCV
6150 LCV
5490
13100
6340
6160
8320
5880 LCV
3700 LCV
6750
6310
71
410
0.6 U
0.7 U
0.6 U
0.7 U
0.6 U
0.6 U
0.8 U
0.5 U
0.6 U
0.7 U
0.7 U
1.6
5.8
3
3.8 LCV
6.4 LCV
3.5 LCV
4.7 LCV
7.5 LCV
3.4
2.8
4.8 LCV
2.7 LCV
190,000
26 LCV, B
22.5 LCV, B
19.2 B
47.6 B
24 B
21.3 B
27.5 B
24.4 LCV, B
13.6 LCV, B
23.7 B
27.6 B
2'
2,000
0.195 J
0.147 J
0.126 J
0.334
0.151 J
0.171 J
0.188 J
0.166 J
0.1 J
0.182 J
0.136 J
0.1
800
0.032 U
0.038 U
0.031 U
0.182 U, D02
0.17 U, D02
0.036 U
0.223 U, D02
0.03 U
0.035 U
0.041 U
0.041 U
O.0
-
1670 B
1410 B
1250
2550
2080
1650
2600
248 B
1370 B
1890
1400
12
-
11
10.1
8.23
23.2
9.99
10.3
15.1
7.4
6.83
10.4
8.86
8
300
4.98
6.17
6.64
8.13
6.47
4.32
8.04
3.59
4.67
5.5
4.71
4
41.000
6.6B
9.3B
9.3
18.6
10.9
5.8
15.1
6.5B
7.1B
7.7
10.3
720,000
12400 B
15900 B
10100
23100
12600
11200
17700
8040 B
7650 B
12000
10200
10f
800
6.2 LCV
3.7 LCV
3.4
6.5
3.7
8.4
4.5
7.3 LCV
2.9 LCV
6.9
3.6
-
2650
2470
2250
5430
2960
1760
4430
1010
1780
2490
2340
1E
23,000
206 B
256 B
349 B
424 B
418 B
204 B
254 B
95.9 B
261 B
274 B
236 B
-
13.3
19.4
14.1
27.5
17.1
11.7
22.1
9.49
12.6
15.5
13.1
-
727
850
574 B
1590 B
825 B
406 B
1210 B
136
404
488 B
762 B
2
5,100
0.4 U
0.5 U
0.4 U
0.5 U
0.4 U
0.5 U
0.6 U
0.4 U
0.4 U
0.5 U
0.5 U
1
5,100
0.075 U
0.09 U
0.073 U, LCV
0.085 U, LCV
0.079 U, LCV
0.084 U, LCV
0.104 U, LCV
0.069 U
0.081 U
0.095 U, LCV
0.096 U, LCV
0.0
-
95.1 J, B
302 B
39.2 J
60.4 J
55.3 J
48.6 J
245
32.6 J, B
41.4 J, B
51.9 J
60.1 J
1
0.3 J
0.4 U
0.6 J, B
1.2 J, B
0.9 J, B
0.8 J, B
0.4 J, B
0.3 U
0.4 J
1.2 J, B
0.6 J, B
-
12.2
9.13
8.96
22.1
11.4
12.3
15.4
7.93
6.28
11.2
9.81
1,
310,000
30.5 B
29.4 B
21.9 B
55.9 B
30 B
24.3 B
38.4 B
22.7 B
16.2 B
29.7 B
23.1 B
31
34
0.0357 LCV
0.01 U, LCV
0.0087 U, LCV
0.0096 U, LCV
0.0088 U, LCV
0.0422 LCV
0.0109 U, LCV
0.0321 LCV
0.0097 U, LCV
0.195 LCV
0.0098 U, LCV
0.i
-Based Screening Level
`ederal criteria are shaded.
Im (ppm)
cted above the indicated reporting limit.
!stimated due to one or more quality co
ie associated Method Blank.
ation exhibited results outside the proje
and quality control limits.
USEPA
Industrial Soil
RSL
SIB-1
(0" - 6„)
SB-2
(0„ - 6..)
SIB-3 DUP1
(0„ - 6") (0„ - 6„)
SB-4
(0„ - 6„)
SIB-5
(0„ - 6„)
S13-6
(0„ - 6„)
SIB-7
(0,. - 6„)
S13-8
(0., - 6„)
SIB-9
(0„ - 6„)
SB-10
(0., - 6,.)
21,000
3.4U
3.4U
3.6U 3.6U
3.9U
3.7U
3.7U
3.6U
3.7U
3.5U
4.3U
540
3.4U
3.4U
3.6U 3.6U
3.9U
3.7U
3.7U
3.6U
3.7U
3.5U
4.3U
540
3.4U
3.4U
3.6U 3.6U
3.9U
3.7U
3.7U
3.6U
3.7U
3.5U
4.3U
740
3.8U
3.8U
4U 4U
4.3U
4.1U
4.1U
4U
4.1 U
3.9U
4.8U
740
3.5U
3.4U
3.6U 3.6U
3.9U
3.7U
3.7U
3.6U
3.7U
3.5U
4.3U
740
3.7U
3.7U
3.9U 3.9U
4.2U
4U
4U
3.9U
4U
3.7U
4.7U
740
8.2U
8.1U
8.6U 8.6U
9.3U
8.9U
8.9U
8.7U
8.8U
8.3U
10U
on 9 Risk -Based Screening Level
I state or federal criteria are shaded.
per kilogram
not detected above the indicated reporting limit.
ompounds (ug/L)
2.3
0.44 U
0.46 U
0.46 U
0.47 U
0.44 U
0.42 U
0.42 U
0.52 U
0.6`
0.4U
0.42U
0.42U
0.43U
0.4U
0.46J
0.38U
0.47U
-
0.48 U
0.51 U
0.51 U
0.52 U
0.48 U
0.45 U
0.45 U
0.56 U
75`
0.46 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.49 U
0.46 U
0.43 U
0.43 U
0.54 U
)pane)
-
0.51 U
0.55 U
0.55 U
0.56 U
0.52 U
0.49 U
0.49 U
0.61 U
3,700
0.48 U
0.51 U
0.51 U
0.52 U
0.48 U
0.45 U
0.45 U
0.56 U
6.1
0.6U
0.64U
0.64U
0.66U
0.61 U
0.58U
0.58U
0.72U
110
0.5U
0.54U
0.54U
0.55U
0.51U
0.48U
0.48U
0.6U
730
0.5 U
0.53 U
0.53 U
0.54 U
0.5 U
0.47 U
0.47 U
0.59 U
73
2.2 U
2.3 U
2.3 U
2.4 U
2.2 U
2.1 U
2.1 U
2.6 U
0.22
0.44 U. L
0.47 U, L
0.47 U, L
0.48 U, L
0.45 U, L
0.42 U
0.42 U
0.53 U
37
0.4U
0.42U
0.42U
0.43U
0.4U
0.38U
0.38U
0.47U
2,900
0.46 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.49 U
0.46 U
0.43 U
0.43 U
0.54 U
180
0.52U
0.56U
0.56U
0.57U
0.53U
0.5U
0.5U
0.62U
150
0.59 U
0.63 U
0.63 U
0.65 U
0.6 U
0.57 U
0.57 U
0.71 U
-
0.4U
0.42U
0.42U
0.43U
0.4U
0.38U
0.38U
0.47U
370
0.42U
0.44U
0.44U
0.45U
0.42U
0.4U
0.4U
0.49U
-
0.48U
0.51 U
0.51 U
0.52U
0.48U
0.45U
0.45U
0.56U
0.15
0.4U
0.42U
0.42U
0.43U
0.4U
0.38U
0.38U
0.47U
-
0.48 U
0.51 U
0.51 U
0.52 U
0.48 U
0.45 U
0.45 U
0.56 U
,no]
2.2U
2.3U
2.3U
2.4U
2.2U
2A U
2.1 U
2.6U
ether
0.45 U
0.47 U
0.47 U
0.48 U
0.45 U
0.42 U
0.42 U
0.53 U
A
0.45 U
0.47 U
0.47 U
0.48 U
0.45 U
0.42 U
0.42 U
0.53 U
0.58 U
0.62 U
0.62 U
0.63 U
0.59 U
0.56 U
0.56 U
0.69 U
ether
0.35 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
0.38 U
0.35 U
0.33 U
0.33 U
0.41 U
-
0.36U
0.38U
0.38U
0.39U
0.36U
0.34U
0.34U
0.42U
3.4
0.25U
0.26U
0.26U
0.27U
0.25U
0.24U
0.24U
0.29U
-
1.5 U
1.6 U
1.6 U
1.6 U
1.5 U
1.4 U
1.4 U
1.8 U
2,200
0.41 U
0.43 U
0.43 U
0.44 U
0.41 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.48 U
-
0.38U
0.4U
0.4U
0.41U
0.38U
0.36U
0.36U
0.45U
- - 3,700
0.28 U
0.29 U
0.29 U
0.3 U
0.28 U
0.26 U
0.26 U
0.33 U
2,100 1,000 11,000
0.36 U
0.38 U
0.38 U
0.39 U
0.36 U
0.34 U
0.34 U
0.42 U
- - 0.029
0.47 U. L
0.49 U, L
0.49 U, L
0.51 U, L
0.47 U, L
0.44 U
0.44 U
0.55 U
0.2 0.1 0.0002`
0.34 U
0.36 U
0.36 U
0.37 U
0.34 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.4 U
- - 0.029
0.35 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
0.38 U
0.35 U
0.33 U
0.33 U
0.41 U
-
0.72 U
0.77 U
0.77 U
0.78 U
0.73 U
0.69 U
0.69 U
0.86 U
0.29
99 U
110 U
110 U
110 U
100 U
94 U
94 U
120 U
1,800
0.44 U
0.46 U
0.46 U
0.47 U
0.44 U
0.42 U
0.42 U
0.52 U
hane
110
0.35 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
0.38 U
0.35 U
0.33 U
0.33 U
0.41 U
0.012
0.4U
0.42U
0.42U
0.43U
0.4U
0.38U
0.38U
0.47U
ate
4.8
1.8 U
1.9 U
1.9 U
1.9 U
1.8 U
1.7 U
1.7 U
2.1 U
35
0.42 U
0.44 U
0.44 U
0.45 U
0.42 U
0.59 J
0.4 U
0.79 J
2.9
0.33 U
0.35 U
0.35 U
0.35 U
0.33 U
0.31 U
0.31 U
0.39 U
0.0029
0.42 U
0.44 U
0.44 U
0.45 U
0.42 U
0.4 U
0.4 U
0.49 U
37
0.5U
0.54U
0.54U
0.55U
0.51 U
0.48U
0.48U
0.6U
29,000
0.22 U
0.23 U
0.23 U
0.24 U
0.22 U
0.21 U
0.21 U
0.26 U
-
0.36U
0.38U
0.38U
0.39U
0.36U
0.34U
0.34U
0.42U
0.4J,B
0.45J,B
0.64J,B
0.42J,B
0.31U
0.29U
0.29U
0.38J
-
0.47U
0.49U
0.49U
0.51 U
0.47U
0.44U
0.44U
0.55U
280 140 1,500
0.4 U
0.42 U
0.42 U
0.43 U
0.4 U
0.38 U
0.38 U
0.47 U
280 140 1,500
0.36 U
0.38 U
0.38 U
0.39 U
0.36 U
0.34 U
0.34 U
0.42 U
1.0 0.22 1`
0.5U
0.54U
0.54U
0.55U
0.51U
0.48U
0.48U
0.6U
1.0 0.5 0.86
0.67U
0.72U
0.72U
0.73U
0.68U
0.64U
0.64U
0.8U
iene
50 25 50'
0.58 U
0.62 U
0.62 U
0.63 U
0.59 U
0.56 U
0.56 U
0.69 U
- - 4.8
0.58U
0.62U
0.62U
0.63U
0.59U
0.56U
0.56U
0.69U
- - 0.029
0.47 U
0.49 U
0,49 U
0.51 U
0.47 U
0.44 U
0.44 U
0.55 U
100 50 71
0.43 U
0.45 U
0.45 U
0.46 U
0.43 U
0.41 U
0.41 U
0.51 U
20 10 0,14
0.75 U
0.8 U
0.8 U
0.82 U
0.76 U
0.72 U
0.72 U
0.89 U
- - 0.12
0.29U
0.31U
0.31U
0.31U
0.29U
0.27U
0.27U
0.34U
ine
0.0096
0.53 U
0.57 U
0.57 U
0.58 U
0.54 U
0.51 U
0.51 U
0.64 U
14
0.5 U, L
0.54 U, L
0.54 U, L
0.55 U. L
0.51 U, L
0.48 U, L
0.48 U, L
0.6 U, L
1.0 0.3 1'
2.2U,L
2.3U,L
2.3U,L
2.4U.L
2.2U,L
2.1U
2.1U
2.6U
- - -
0.44U
0.46U
0.46U
0.47U
0.44U
0.42U
0.42U
0.52U
2,100 210 11,000
0.39 U
0.41 U
0.41 U
0.42 U
0.39 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
0.46 U
1,100
0.34 U
0.36 U
0.36 U
0.37 U
0.34 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.4 U
Vermont Enforcement Standard from the Vermont Ground Water Protection Rule and Strategy
of Vermont Preventative Action Level from the Vermont Ground Water Protection Rule and Strategy
tates Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Level - Tapwater
ant I e.vel (MCI 1
Tapwater
E.S. P.A.L. RSL
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
- (MVN-4). _
MW-5
MW-6
MW-7
npounds (uglL)
1e
200 100 200'
0.82 U
0.82 U
0.82 U
0.82 U
0.82 U
0.82 U
0.82 U
0.82 U
ethane
- - 0.067
0.21U
0.21U
0.21U
0.21U
0.21U
0.21U
0.21U
0.21U
ie
5.0 2.5 5'
0.23U
0.23U
0.23U
0.23U
0.23U
0.23U
0.23U
0.23U
xoethane
- - 59,000
0.31 U
0.31 U
0.31 U
0.31 U
0.31 U
0.31 U
0.31 U
0.31 U
70 35 2.4
0.38 U
0.38 U
0.38 U
0.38 U
0.38 U
0.38 U
0.38 U
0.38 U
7.0 0.7 7-
0.29 U
0.29 U
0.29 U
0.29 U
0.29 U
0.29 U
0.29 U
0.29 U
ene
70 35 2.3
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
ropropane
- - 0.2`
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
(EDB)
0.05'
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
e
- - 370
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
5.0 0.5 5'
0.21 U
0.21 U
0.21 U
0.21 U
0.21 U
0.21 U
0.21 U
0.21 U
Total
- - 330
0.7U
0.7U
0.7U
0.7U
0.7U
0.7U
0.7U
0.7U
e
5.0 0.5 5'
0.72 U
0.72 U
0.72 U
0.72 U
0.72 U
0.72 U
0.72 U
0.72 U
e
- - -
0.78 U
0.76 U
0.78 U
0.78 U
0.78 U
0.78 U
0.78 U
0.78 U
e
0.43
0.84 U
0.84 U
0.84 U
0.84 U
0.84 U
0.84 U
0.84 U
0.84 U
7,100
1.3 U
1.3 U
1.3 U
1.3 U
1.3 U
1.3 U
1.3 U
1.3 U
47
1.2 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
1.2 U
ne (MIBK)
- - 2,000
2.1 U
2.1 U
2.1 U
2.1 U
2.1 U
2.1 U
2.1 U
2.1 U
700 350 22,000
3U
3U
3.2J
3U
3U
3U
3U
4.7J
5.0 0.5 5-
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
0.41U
ane
80 8.0 0.1
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
0.39 U
80 8.0 8.5
0.26 U
0.26 U
0.26 U
0.26 U
0.26 U
0.26 U
0.26 U
0.26 U
10 1.0 8.7
0.69 U
0.69 U
0.69 U
0.69 U
0.69 U
0.69 U
0.69 U
0.69 U
- - 1,000
0.19U
0.19U
0.19U
0.19U
0.19U
0.19U
0.19U
0.19U
e
5.0 0.5 5-
0.27 U
0.27 U
0.27 U
0.27 U
0.27 U
0.27 U
0.27 U
0.27 U
100 50 100*
0.75 U
0.75 U
0.75 U
0.75 U
0.75 U
0.75 U
0.75 U
0.75 U
lane
- - 0.15
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
- - 21,000
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
0.32 U
80 8.0 0.2
0.34 U
0.34 U
0.34 U
0.34 U
0.34 U
0.34 U
0.34 U
0.34 U
30 15 190
0.35 U
0.35 U
0.35 U
0.35 U
0.35 U
0.35 U
0.35 U
0.35 U
:ne
70 35 70'
0.81U
0.81U
0.81U
0.81U
0.81U
0.81U
0.81U
0.81U
)ene
- - 0.43
0.36 U
0.36 U
0.36 U
0.36 U
0.36 U
0.36 U
0.36 U
0.36 U
- - 13,000
0.18U
0.18U
0.18U
0.18U
0.18U
0.18U
0.18U
0.18U
hane
1000 500 390
0.68 U
0.68 U
0.68 U
0.68 U
0.68 U
0.68 U
0.68 U
0.68 U
700 350 700`
0.74 U
0.74 U
0.74 U
0.74 U
0.74 U
0.74 U
0.74 U
0.74 U
- - 680
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
0.79 U
- - 37,000
0.5U
0.5U
0.5U
0.5U
0.5U
0.5U
0.5U
0.5U
ier
40 20 12
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
- - -
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
0.16U
5.0 0.5 5`
0.44 U
0.44 U
0.44 U
0.44 U
0.44 U
0.44 U
0.44 U
0.44 U
100 50 100'
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
0.73 U
5.0 0.5 5-
0.36U
0.36U
0.36U
0.36U
0.36U
0.36U
0.36U
0.36U
1,000 500 1,000'
0.51U
0.51U
0.51U
0.51U
0.51U
0.51U
0.51U
0.51U
thene
100 50 100*
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
ropene
- - 0.43
0.37 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
0.37 U
5.0 0.5 5`
0.46U
0.46U
0.46U
0.46U
0.46U
0.46U
0.46U
0.46U
ane
2100 1050 1,300
0.88 U
0.88 U
0.88 U
0.88 U
0.88 U
0.88 U
0.88 U
0.88 U
2.0 0.5 2'
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
0.9 U
10,000 5.000 10,000`
0.66 U
0.66 U
0.66 U
0,66 U
0.66 U
1 0.66 U
0.66 U
0.66 U
e of Vermont Enforcement Standard from the Vermont Ground Water Protection Rule and Strategy
ate of Vermont Preventative Action Level from the Vermont Ground Water Protection Rule and Strategy
!d States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Level - Tapwater
I state or federal criteria are shaded.
)er liter (ppb)
ninant level (MCL)
s not detected above the indicated reporting limit.
result is estimated due to one or more quality control parameters.
Tapwater
E.S. P.A.L. RSL
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
--' -"-""-
(MW-4)
MW-5
MW-6
MW-7
- - 37
0.047 J
0.41
0.94
0.067 J
0.068 J
0.211 B
0.134 J, B
0.836 B
0.006 0.003 0.006'
0.0068 U
0.0068 U
0.0068 U
0.0068 U
0.0068 U
0.0068 U, LCV
0.0068 U, LCV
0.0068 U, LCV
0.01 0.001 0.01`
0.0056 U, LCV
0.0056 U, LCV
0.0056 U, LCV
0.0056 U, LCV
0.0056 U, LCV
0.0056 U, LCV
0.0056 U, LCV
0.0056 U, LCV
2 1 2'
0.0434
0.0819
0.293
0.0375
0.0368
0.149
0.0385
0.155
0.004 0.001 0.004'
0.0002 U
0.0002 U
0.0002 U
0.0002 U
0.0002 U
0.0002 U
0.0002 J
0.0002 U
0.005 0.0025 0.005'
0.0003 U
0.0003 U
0.0003 U
0.0003 U
0.0003 U
0.0003 U
0.0003 U
0.0003 U
- - -
8.3
36
73.5
22.9
22.4
127 B
126 B
60 B
0.1 0.05 0.1'
0.0009 U
0.0012 J
0.0021 J
0.0009 J
0.0009 U
0.0009 U
0.0011 J
0.0011 J
- - 0.011
0.0006 U
0.0006 U
0.0006 U
0.0006 U
0.0006 U
0.0012 J
0.0011 J
0.0027 J
1.3 0.65 1.3'
0.0015 U, B9
0.0015 U, B9
0.0015 U. B9
0.0015 U. B9
0.0015 U, B9
0.0035 J
0.0015 U
0.0035 J
- - 26
0.039 J, B
0.39 B
0.598 B
0.046 J, B
0.058 B
0.249
0.118
0.906
0.015 0.0015 0.015'
0.003 U
0.003 U
0.003 U
0.003 U
0.003 U
0.003 U
0.003 U
0.003 U
- - -
1.48
3.08
22.9
2.34
2.26
14.2
36.2
13.8
0.84 0.42 0.88
0.0343 B
0.0367 B
0.372 B
0.0456 8
0.0445 B
0,114 8
0.259 B
2.87 B
0.1 0.05 0.73
0.0013 U
0.0013 U
0.0016 J
0.0013 U
0.0013 U
0.0023 J
0.0061 J
0.0068 J
- - -
1.71
2.13
5.17
2.48
2.44
12.1
4.61
2.5
0.05 0.025 0.05'
0.0087 U
0.0087 U
0.0087 U
0,0087 U
0.0087 U
0.0087 U
0.0087 U
0.0087 U
0.1 0.05 0.18
0.0012 U, LCV
0.0012 U, LCV
0.0012 U. LCV
0.0012 U, LCV
0.0012 U, LCV
0.0012 U
0.0012 U
0.0012 U
- - -
2.4
28.8
6.2
120
119
311 LCV, 8
511 LCV, B
4.6 LCV, B
0.002 0.001 0.002'
0.0102 U
0.0102 U
0.0102 U
0.0102 U
0.0102 U
0.0102 U
0.0102 U
0.0102 U
- - 0.18
0.0011 U
0.0011 U
0.0015 J
0.0011 U
0.0011 U
0.0011 U
0.0011 U
0.0014 J
5 3 11
0.0026 J, B
0.003 J, B
0.0055 J, 8
0.002 J, B
0.0017 U
0.0028 LCV, J
0.0185 LCV
0.0096 LCV, J
0.002 0.0005 0.002'
1 0.0001 U
0.0001 U
1 0.0001 U
I 0.0001 U
0.0001 U
0.0001 U, LCV
0.0001 U, LCV
0.0001 U, LCV
e of Vermont Enforcement Standard from the Vermont Ground Water Protection Rule and Strategy
ate of Vermont Preventative Action Level from the Vermont Ground Water Protection Rule and Strategy
td States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Level - Tapwater
Onant Level (MCL)
I state or federal criteria are shaded.
ar liter (ppm)
s not detected above the indicated reporting limit.
result is estimated due to one or more quality control parameters.
ected in the associated Method Blank.
is detected in the Method / Calibration Blank at a level above the reporting limit. The sample was non -detect for this analyte, therefore, no corrective action was necessary.
on Verification exhibited results outside the project established control limits but within standard quality control limits.
Tapwater
E.S. P.A.L. RSL
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
-- -'- -
(MW-4)
MW-5
MW-6
MW-7
0.029
0.0095 U
0.0091 U
0.0097 U
0.0097 U
0.0091 U
0.0087 U
0.0087 U
0.0096 U
0.2
0.012 U
0.011 U
0.012 U
0.012 U
0.011 U
0.011 U
0.011 U
0.012 U
0.2
0.011U
0.011U
0,012U
0.012U
0.011U
0.01U
0.01U
0.011U
0.004
0.0068 U
0.0065 U
0.0069 U
0.0069 U
0.0065 U
0.0062 U
0.0062 U
0.0069 U
0.011
0.0068 U
0.0065 U
0.0069 U
0.0069 U
0.0065 U
0.0062 U
0.0062 U
0.0069 U
0.19
0.015U
0.015U
0.016U
0.016U
0.015U
0.014U
0.014U
0.015U
0.037
0.026 U
0.025 U
0.026 U
0.026 U
0.025 U
0.023 U
0.023 U
0.026 U
2*
0.03 U
0.029 U
0.031 U
0.031 U
0.029 U
0.027 U
0,027 U
0.03 U
-
0.01 U
0.01 U
0.011 U
0.011 U
0.01 U
0.0095 U
0.0095 U
0.011 U
0.0042
0.01 U
0.0097 U
0,01 U
0.01 U
0.0097 U
0.0092 U
0.0092 U
0.01 U
220
0.011 U
0.011 U
0.012 U
0.012 U
0.011 U
0.01 U
0.01 U
0.011 U
-
0.012 U
0.012 U
0.013 U
0.013 U
0.012 U
0.011 U
0.011 U
0.012 U
-
0.016 U
0.016 U
0.017 U
0.017 U
0.016 U
0.015 U
0.015 U
0.016 U
2*
0.014U
0.014U
0.015U
0.015U
0.014U
0.013U
0.013U
0.014U
-
0.017 U
0.016 U
0.017 U
0.017 U
0.016 U
0.015 U
0.015 U
0.017 U
-
0.012 U
0.012 U
0.013 U
0.013 U
0.012 U
0.011 U
0.011 U
0.012 U
rne)
0.061
0.0062 U
0.0059 U
0.0063 U
0.0063 U
0.0059 U
0.0057 U
0.0057 U
0.0062 U
-
0.17
0.029 J
0.045 J
0.012 U
0.011 U
0.01 U
0.01 U
0.045 J
0.4*
0.0088 U
0.0084 U
0.0089 U
0.0089 U
0.0084 U
0.008 U
0.008 U
0.0089 U
0.2*
0.0055 U
0.0087 J
0.0056 U
0.0056 U
0.0052 U
0.012 J
0.005 U
0.012 J
40*
0,015U
0.014U
0.015U
0.015U
0.014U
0.013U
0.013U
0.015U
3*
0.12U
0.12U
0.13U
0.13U
0.12U
0.11U
0.11U
0.13U
370
0.15 U, C8
0.15 U, C8
0.16 U, C8
0.16 U, C8
0.16 U, C8
0.14 U, C8
0.15 U, C8
0.17 U, C8
70*
0.4 U, C8
0.4 U, C8
0.42 U, C8
0.42 U, C8
0.43 U, C8
0.38 U
0.41 U
0.46 U
200*
0.3 U, C8
0.3 U, C8
0.32 U, C8
0.32 U, C8
0.33 U, C8
0.29 U
0.31 U
0.35 U
7`
0.18 U, C8
0.18 U, C8
0.19 U, C8
0.19 U, C8
0.19 U, C8
0.17 U
0.18 U
0.21 U
500*
0.22 U, C8
0.22 U, C8
0.23 U, C8
0.23 U, C8
0.23 U, C8
0.21 U, C8
0.22 U, C8
0.25 U, C8
50*
0.36 U, C8
0.36 U, C8
0.38 U, C8
0.38 U, C8
0.39 U, C8
0.35 U
0.37 U
0.41 U
e of Vermont Enforcement Standard from the Vermont Ground Water Protection Rule and Strategy
ate of Vermont Preventative Action Level from the Vermont Ground Water Protection Rule and Strategy
!d States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Level - Tapwater
ninant level (MCL)
I state or federal criteria are shaded.
)er liter (ppb)
s not detected above the indicated reporting limit.
result is estimated due to one or more quality control parameters.
ue to insufficient well production.
'ification recovery was above the method control limit for this analyte. A high bias may be indicated.
APPENDIX 4
ATSDR
AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES
AND DISEASE REGISTRY
POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC
HYDROCARBONS (PAHs)
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ToxFAQs September 1996
This fact sheet answers the most frequently asked health questions (FAQs) about polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs). For more information, call the ATSDR Information Center at 1-888-422-8737.
This fact sheet is one in a series of summaries about hazardous substances and their health effects. This
information is important because this substance may harm you. The effects of exposure to any hazardous
substance depend on the dose, the duration, how you are exposed, personal traits and habits, and whether
other chemicals are present.
SUMMARY: Exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons usually occurs by
breathing air contaminated by wild fires or coal tar, or by eating foods that have
been grilled. PAHs have been found in at least 600 of the 1,430 National Priorities
List sites identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
What are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons?
(Pronounced pol'i-siiklik ar'a-mdtfilc hildro-
karlbonz)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of
over 100 different chemicals that are formed during the
incomplete burning of coal, oil and gas, garbage, or other
organic substances like tobacco or charbroiled meat. PAHs
are usually found as a mixture containing two or more of
these compounds, such as soot.
Some PAHs are manufactured. These pure PAHs usually
exist as colorless, white, or pale yellow -green solids. PAHs are
found in coal tar, crude oil, creosote, and roofing tar, but a few
are used in medicines or to make dyes, plastics, and pesti-
cides.
What happens to PAHs when they enter the
environment?
❑ PAHs enter the air mostly as releases from volcanoes,
forest fires, burning coal, and automobile exhaust.
❑ PAHs can occur in air attached to dust particles.
❑ Some PAH particles can readily evaporate into the air
from soil or surface waters.
❑ PAHs can break down by reacting with sunlight and other
chemicals in the air, over a period of days to weeks.
❑ PAHs enter water through discharges from industrial and
wastewater treatment plants.
❑ Most PAHs do not dissolve easily in water. They stick to
solid particles and settle to the bottoms of lakes or rivers.
❑ Microorganisms can break down PAHs in soil or water
after a period of weeks to months.
❑ In soils, PAHs are most likely to stick tightly to particles;
certain PAHs move through soil to contaminate under-
ground water.
❑ PAH contents of plants and animals may be much higher
than PAH contents of soil or water in which they live.
How might I be exposed to PAHs?
❑ Breathing air containing PAHs in the workplace of
coking, coal -tar, and asphalt production plants; smoke-
houses; and municipal trash incineration facilities.
❑ Breathing air containing PAHs from cigarette smoke,
wood smoke, vehicle exhausts, asphalt roads, or agricul-
tural burn smoke.
❑ Coming in contact with air, water, or soil near hazardous
waste sites.
❑ Eating grilled or charred meats; contaminated cereals,
flour, bread, vegetables, fruits, meats; and processed or
pickled foods.
❑ Drinking contaminated water or cow's milk.
LYCYCLIC
MATIC
Page
a1e 1 , ♦ ,
HYDROCARBONS 1
ToxFAQs Internet address via WWW is http://www.atsdr.cdc.ziov/toxfaq.html
❑ Nursing infants of mothers living near hazardous waste
sites may be exposed to PAHs through their mother's milk.
How can PAHs affect my health?
Mice that were fed high levels of one PAH during
pregnancy had difficulty reproducing and so did their off-
spring. These offspring also had higher rates of birth defects
and lower body weights. It is not known whether these effects
occur in people.
Animal studies have also shown that PAHs can cause
harmful effects on the skin, body fluids, and ability to fight
disease after both short- and long-term exposure. But these
effects have not been seen in people.
How likely are PAHs to cause cancer?
The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
has determined that some PAHs may reasonably be expected to
be carcinogens.
Some people who have breathed or touched mixtures of
PAHs and other chemicals for long periods of time have
developed cancer. Some PAHs have caused cancer in labora-
tory animals when they breathed air containing them (lung
cancer), ingested them in food (stomach cancer), or had them
applied to their skin (skin cancer).
Is there a medical test to show whether I've
been exposed to PAHs?
In the body, PAHs are changed into chemicals that can
attach to substances within the body. There are special tests
that can detect PAHs attached to these substances in body
tissues or blood. However, these tests cannot tell whether any
health effects will occur or find out the extent or source of
your exposure to the PAHs. The tests aren't usually available
in your doctor's office because special equipment is needed to
conduct them.
Has the federal government made
recommendations to protect human health?
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) has set a limit of 0.2 milligrams of PAHs per cubic
meter of air (0.2 mg/m'). The OSHA Permissible Exposure
Limit (PEL) for mineral oil mist that contains PAHs is 5 mg/m'
averaged over an 8-hour exposure period.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) recommends that the average workplace air levels for
coal tar products not exceed 0.1 mg/m' for a 10-hour workday,
within a 40-h6ur workweek. There are other limits for work-
place exposure for things that contain PAHs, such as coal, coal
tar, and mineral oil.
Glossary
Carcinogen: A substance that can cause cancer.
Ingest: Take food or drink into your body.
References
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).
1995. Toxicological profile for polycyclic aromatic hydrocar-
bons. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service.
Where can I get more information? For more information, contact the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry, Division of Toxicology, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop F-32, Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: 1-888-422-8737,
FAX: 770-488-4178. ToxFAQs Internet address via WWW is http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html ATSDR can tell you where
to find occupational and environmental health clinics. Their specialists can recognize, evaluate, and treat illnesses resulting
from exposure to hazardous substances. You can also contact your community or state health or environmental quality
department if you have any more questions or concerns.
APPENDIX 5
No Text
GE Healthcare
25 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
802-658-2664
Location: The Subject Property
1. UVM & State Agricultural College
109 South Prospect Street
South Burlington, VT 05405
802-656-0137 (Agricultural Sciences Deans Office)
802-656-2240 (Planning and Management Office)
Location: Northeast of the Subject Property
2. Robert Berman LLC
35 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
No Phone Number Available
Location: North of the Subject Property
3. The Heritage Automotive Group
30 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
802-865-8200
Location: North of the Subject Property
4. The Heritage Automotive Group
1620 Shelburne Rd.
South Burlington, VT 05403
802-865-8200
Location: Northwest of the Subject Property
5. MDT Partnership LLP
5 Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
802-864-0049 (AAMCO Transmission)
Location: West of the Subject Property
6. Kurt V. & Laura M. Reichelt
1690 Shelburne Rd.
South Burlington, VT 05403
802-985-3035 (Home Number)
Location: Southwest of the Subject Property
U:\PROJECTS\MWH - GE Healthcare\Adjoining Parcel Information.docx
7. Lark Inns LP
1720 Shelburne Rd.
South Burlington, VT 05403
802-860-9900 (Smart Suites)
802-860-1986 (Mainstay Suites)
Location: Southwest of the Subject Property
8. City of South Burlington
17 Quail Run
South Burlington, VT 05403
802-846-4107 (City Manager)
Location: Southeast of the Subject Property
U:\PROJECTS\MWH - GE Healthcare\Adjoining Parcel Information.docx
<�-7 IC
AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES (ANR) AND ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250)
PROJECT REVIEW SHEET
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
TOTAL # DEC PERMITS PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW
RESPONSE DATE PENDING APPLICATION
DISTRICT TOWN sc c.� i �u/a�� NG 7-13,�/ PIN #
OWNER OF PROJECT SITE:
NAME: --Z7.// x
APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE:
NAME: —IT?Lj -_ii e-112. /c,
ADDRESS: ,�� 0q—r7 ADDRESS:_ s, x a
�n� � � 2L I ��r�71 i�/ � y� � �l L '_ TB 1✓ � ��g �
TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE:__
Based on information provided by �6r2 ��LL received only/Q� a project was reviewed on a
tract/tracts of land of - �% acres, located o fin/ , LEE The project is generally described as:
e Lf C-4 Pa l r
`Tt �0,2- G�✓a J V7-?'9-t N .tea kfE�e-
/ 2 SS5,a4At- , i A/c�>�i}�F / ,V Prior Permits From This Office: 4-/ L�?- r o f
E7. PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR
INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30
DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)).
Commercial, residential or municipal project? Length of new/improved road(s)
Has the landowner subdivided before? When/where/# of lots
AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: AYES NO; Copies sent to Statutory Parties: YES NO
ma
COMMENTS: i"c& wedin 4c,�z5� WY tT RYrt.
/�1 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION - DISTRICTS #4,6 &9
111 WEST STREET
SIGNATURE:_ ' A� B DATE: 2 _ ADDRESS: ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452
Dw4ict Courdinat6r Telephone: (802)879-5614
WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED YES NO
Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Subdivision &/or Exemption Deferral of Subdivision
Tent/Travel Trailer Campground Mobile Home Park Floor Drains (UIC) Sewer Extension
REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED:
AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES
SIGNATURE: DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ATE: �?�DDRESS: CONSERVATION
_ Environmental Assistance Division Telephone: (802)879-5676 111 WEST STREET
Wastewater Management Division Telephone: (802)879-5656 ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452
THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION BY THE PERMIT SPECIALIST REGARDING OTHER
PERMITS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE
DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW AND ON THE REVERSE SIDE.
3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact:
Discharge Permit; pretreatment permits; industrial, municipal Stormwater permits (state and federal, UIC)
Indirect discharge permit Residuals management sludge disposal
OVER
OTHER PERMITS AND REVIEWS YOU MAY NEED: (Continued)
4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3840) Contact: Wood Fired Units (z90HP)
Construction/modification of source Open Burning
Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation Industrial Process Air Emissions Diesel Engines (> 200 bHP)
5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400)
Well head protection areas
Construction Permit, water system improvements
6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR
Hydroelectric Projects (241-3770)
Shoreland encroachment (241-3777)
Wetlands (241-3770)
Stream Alteration (751-0129)
Contact:
Bottled Water
Permit to operate
New Hydrants
New Source
Contact:
_ Use of chemicals in State waters (241 -3777)
_ Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777)
_ Section 401 Water Quality Certificate; (241-3770)
Water Withdrawal (241-3770)
0 WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Z �6
Hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility certificate (241-3888) Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888)
Hazardous waste handler notification requirement (241-3888) Asbestos Disposal (241-3444)
Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444) Composting transporter 1ilitiecertificate (24143888)
Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444)
Waste oil burning (241-3888)
8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact:
Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451)
State funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750)
9. POLLUTION PREVENTION HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559)
RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100)
SMALL BUSINESS COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Contact:
Contact:
Contact: Judy Mirro 802-241-3745
10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Contact:
Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) F
Stream Obstruction Approval
11 EPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office#
Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) Sprinkler Systems
Storage of flammable liquids, explosives LP Gas Storage
Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers Boilers and pressure vessels
2. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Conta t: p� L &lead at
�Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors _ Program for asbestos control
Children's camps Hot Tub Installation& Inspection - Commercial
13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact:
Child care facilities (241-2158) Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities)
Nursing Homes (241-2345) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345)
14.
AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact:
_ Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653)
_ Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651)
_ Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653)
Construction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653)
15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431)
Milk processing facilities (828-2433)
Golf courses (828-2431)
Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431)
Junkyards (828-2067)
Railroad crossings (828-2760)
Airports and landing strips (828-2833)
Contact:
Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426)
Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-2421)
Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436)
Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436)
16. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE (800-642-3281) VT Residential Building Energy Standards (See Enclosure)
17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3226) Historic buildings Archeological sites
18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134)
19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683)
20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines)
jDEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise tax/solid waste
22 LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS)
23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BLDG 10-18, CAMP JOHNSON, COLCHESTER, VT 05446 (655-0334)
25. OTHER: REVISION DATE: Form Date 11/97
Rev. 6/99
A
State of Vermont
WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT
LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
Environmental Protection Rules
Effective August 8, 1996
Case Number: WW-4-1320
PIN: EJ98-0330
Landowner: IDX Systems Corporation
Address: 1500 Shelburne Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
This project, consisting of increasing the number of employees to 222 within the former Green
Mountain Power Building referenced in Certification of Compliance 4CO094 and Amendments
served by municipal water and wastewater services, located off Green Mountain Drive in the city
of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named
above, subject to the following conditions.
This permit does not constitute approval under Act 250 case number 4CO094 & Amendments.
GENERAL
1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as
may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of
Environmental Conservation and local officials pLior to proceeding with this project.
2. No alterations to the building other than those indicated on the approved plan or Water
Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit, which would change or affect the exterior water
supply, or wastewater disposal, or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without
prior review and approval from the Division of Wastewater Management.
3. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for public
buildings under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit.
4. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of
Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose
of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations,
with this permit.
5. All conditions set forth in Certificate of Compliance and Subdivision Permit 44CO094 and
Amendments shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein.
Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit
WW-4-1320
IDX Systems Corporation
Page 2
WATER SUPPLY
6. The lot is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system. No other
means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the
Wastewater Management Division.
WASTEWATER DISPOSAL
7. The lot is approved for connection to the municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted
on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 3,300 gallons of
wastewater per day. No other method of wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior
review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division, and such approval will not
be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations.
Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this December 22, 1999.
Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner
Department of Environmental Conservation
By
Ernest P. Christianson
Environmental Analyst V
c For the Record
South Burlington_ Planning Commission & Select Board .r
Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Act 250 coordinator-4C0094 & Amendments.
Water Supply Division
To:
Joe Weith
Prom
Brad Carter
CC:
none
Dater
07/22/99
eta
IDX 25 Green Mountair Drive
With regard to the Sewer allocation,, I have caiculated the existing allocation to be 210p gpd based on
an employee population of 175. The new population of 222 will require a total of 3,330 gpd.
Based on these caluculations, we are requestin& an increase in allocation of 564 gpd.
I will contact you to discuss the fees to be paid in regards to this increase, Thank you.
80 Kimball Ave. South Burlington, VT 06403 ph (K2)-862-7600 fax (602)-862-1932
O
State of Vermont
R-
Y
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation
Department of Environmental Conservation
March 16, 1999
Diane M. McCarthy, Esquire
Sheehey, Furlong, Rendall & Behm
P.O. Box 66
Burlington, VT 05402
Dear Diane:
J
AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Department of Environmental Conservation
Wastewater Management Division
111 West Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Telephone #(802) 879-5656
Subject: Case number # 4C0094-2, Green Mountain Power Building located off 25 Green
Mountain Drive, South Burlington, Vermont.
This letter shall confirm our discussions regarding the occupancy within the referenced above
building. Based on the confusion surrounding the project, I will accept the total occupancy for the
building be 1,74 employees. I base this decision on several factors which include information stating
the building has been equipped with low flow plumbing fixtures, a letter dated July 27, 1982 from the
architectural firm of Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley to Mr. Bill Symanski, City Engineer,
stating the future work force would generate 2,250 gallons of sewage per day and a letter from Mr.
William Szymanski, City Manager, to Jim Agan, Assistant Regional Engineer, stating the city will
accept the wastewater from the building. The two letters were received prior to issuing the
Certification of Compliance #4C0094-2 on October 13, 1983.
Please contact me at 1-802-879-5675 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Ernest P. Christianson
Regional Engineer
copies: City of South Burlington
State of Vermont
SUBDIVISION PERMIT
LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
Environmental Protection Rules
Effective August 8, 1996
Case Number: 4C0094-2C
Pin Number: EJ98-0330
Landowner: Green Mountain Power Real Estate Corporation
Address: Green Mountain Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
This project, consisting of a one lot subdivision identified as Lot #17 being 9.4 acres in size on
which is situated the building approved in Certification of Compliance 4C0094-2 located off Green
Mountain Drive in the city of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements
of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions.
This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4C0094.
GENERAL
The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project 82-307, Sheet No. S-3A
"Location Plan" dated March 22, 1983 prepared by Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Foley
and which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. The
project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the
Wastewater Management Division.
2. Each prospective purchaser of the lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and
this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot.
The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and
enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee
shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording"
in the city of South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and
prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit.
4. All conditions set forth in Certificate of Compliance #4C0094-2 shall remain in effect except
as modified or amended herein.
Subdivision Permit
4C0094-2C
Page 2
5. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of
Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose
of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations,
with this permit.
6. This project has been reviewed and is approved with the existing building referenced in
Certification of Compliance 4C0094-2. No other buildings are allowed without prior review
and approval by the Agency, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal
conforms to the applicable laws and regulations.
Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on February 25, 1999.
Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner
Department of Environmental Conservation
By
Ernest P. Christianson
Regional Engineer
c For the Record
South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board
Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Foley
Act 250 Environmental Commission #4 - #4C0094
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
January 29, 1999
Irene Roberge
Agency of Natural Resources
1 I I West Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Re: Sewer Connection, 25 Green Mountain Drive
Dear Ms. Roberge:
Please be advised that there is an existing sewer allocation of 2610 gpd and an existing connection to the
Municipal sewer system at 25 Green Mountain Drive. This property is served by the Bartlett Bay
Wastewater Treatment Facility which has sufficient capacity to handle this existing demand.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Si
Joe Tf eith, Director
PlarAing and Zoning
JW/mcp
TRANS/OP INC.
SYSTEMS ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
P. O. BOX 2304 - SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PHON'3 (802) 878-5977
October 1, 1982
Mr. Robert J. Perry
Attorney
1480 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mir. Perry
In regard to the pavement widening needs for the west side of the south
leg at the intersection of Shelburne Road, Green Mountain Drive, and
Bartlett Bay Road, the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAOT) has recom-
mended a full -lane width of 12 ft for 1500 ft with a 600-ft taper. The
estimated cost for this improvement, at $24.00 per lineal foot, is approxi-
mately $50,000. This design is predicated on rural -area conditions.
If the VAOT design procedure is followed for urban criteria, then a 500-ft
full -width section and a 320-ft taper are required for this location. The
cost in this latter case is estimated at about $20,000.
Please advise of any additional assistance that may be required in this
matter. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E.
Vice -President
JCO:njk
cc: Mr. Walter Oakes (10/08/82)
Mr. David Spitz (10/08/82)
PERRY & SCHMUCKER
ATTORNEYS AT. LAW
1480 WILLISTON ROAD
P. 0. BOX, 2323
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402
ROBERT J. PERRY
TELEPHONE 9e3-48Ee
RONALD C. SCHMUCKER Jentember 15, 10 0 AREA CODE 802
Tor. icseph Landry
Agency of Transportation
Administration Building
133 State Street
Pviontpelier, Vt. 05602
Re: Green hountain rower
Dear •I.r. Landry:
At the outset, I would to thank you for the information and
assistance you have given me regarding your agency's position on
the Route 7 traffic. Unfortunately, we appear to be in a Catch
22 situation, inasmuch as the South Eurlington Planning Commission
insists of a current resolution of the traffic issues at the
intersection of Green ri,:ountain Drive and route 7.
The Planning Commission insists that no project reduces the
highway level of service below C. As Dr. Onnenlander's report
makes clear, the Green nountain project can depress service
levels during peak hours. ]however, he did recommend that a
change of the traffic signal from 3 phase to 2 phase combined
with the addition of a tapered return lane at the southwesterly
side of the intersection would improve the traffic flow at all'
times. I believe it is your agency's position that the traffic
flow does not warrant a 3 phase signal -at this time, but, that
there are no current plans to retime the lights. I further
understand that the agency takes position that it cannot require
modification of state highways for projects which do not abut a
state road. This is the generally accepted legal wisdom, but
unfortunately, the City Planning Commission has seen fit to
extend its jurisdiction and appears to be reauirina that Green
.ountain Power absorb all the costs of highway improvements
necessary to maintain level of service C. Obviously, it is our
position that we contribute to the traffic and could share in the
costs, but that we cannot be required to fully fund the appropriate
highway improvements.
For the benefit of both `reen _'',ountain power and the City,
it would be helpful.to know of the approximate costs of the re-
design of the traffic signals and construction of a re --entry lane
for south bound traffic. Therefore, I N,.,ould request information
.from you as to the agency's cost to perform that work, together
PERRY Be SCHMUCKER
Mr. Joseph Landry
September 15, 1982
Page two
with some estimate of the time of construction, if it were to be
authorized. Dr. Oppenlander and I stand ready to provide any
additional information or assistance you might deem appropriate.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Perry
RJP/mb
CC. Walter Oakes
David Spitz
in
i
May 31, 1983
Attorney Robert Perry
Perry & Schmucker
1480 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Bob,
I am writing about two matters concerning Green Nbuntain Power. First,
the revision in the landscaping plan is acceptable. A number of people who
have visited the work site have ccmnented on the exceptional use of existing
trees, and I see no reason to require any more new plantings than those
shown on the revised plan.
Second, I am not happy with progress on the pedestrian trail issue. I
have not yet received a formal offer of dedication for the trail - a violation
of the site plan cmditions. Also, my understanding has been that the trail
location along the northerly boundary was a temporary location until airore
suitable connection to City -owned land could be looked at. After looking
at the site, I definitely feel a revised trail location would be preferable.
I have offered several times, through you, to walk the site with a GAT re-
presentative but have as yet received no response. I hope we can resolve this
issue before I leave at the end of the sumier.
Please call if you have any questions.
Very truly,
David H. Spitz,
City Planner
DHS/iTcg
cc: Walter Uakes
January 12, 1983
Attorney ibbert Perry
Perry & Schmucker
1480 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear 1.7ob,
I ixii requesting that you facilitate the final filing requirements for
the Green Mountain Power develo;�xrent. After a recent letter to Jr*Wre
(a copy was sent. to you) , I received a large detailed plan set for the
GMP project. Unfortunately, that plan set bore little relation to the
plans that you referenced in your pedestrian trail easetrent; nor did it
provide the relatively simple information tlzt we required frccl the August
3 site plan stipulations.
Also, I appear to have received' a pedestrian trail easellent from you
r4 but no offer of dedication.
� ` vbuld you please make sure that all remaining submittals are consistent
and satisfy the City's stated requirements. If you are not the proper person
to pursue this ratter, could you please get me the nan-e- of one person who
*7-
can oversee the conclusion of these details.
VJ 1P'A J Th
ank you.
Nc
VNM
N
Sincerely,
David H. Spitz,
City Planner
3-
PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 3. 1982
4. Stipulations three through eight from the previous approval dated
November 10, 1982 shall remain in effect.
Mr. Ewing seconded the motion.
Mr. Jacob asked what would happen if Mr. Larkin gave up his rights to
commercial use on the large lot and then were taken to court over the
residential use - he would be unable to use the lot at all. Mr. Ewing noted
that, in a case like that, Mr. Larkin could come back to the Commission to
request a change to the stipulation.
Mr. Walsh moved to amend the motion by adding the words "present and
future" between the words "his" and "rights" in stipulation #1. Mr. Ewing
seconded the motion, but it failed with Messrs. Ewing and Walsh voting yes
and Messrs. Woolery, Jacob and Mona voting no.
The motion carried on a 4-1 vote, with Mr. Jacob voting no. He stated
that he felt an office building would be more appropriate on this site.
Sketch plan application by LTH Associates for creation of-3 commercial lots
within the previously approved Bartlett property subdivision on Shelburne Rd.
The question of access for the three lots was discussed. Mr. Spitz
said he did not like the "handle" on lot 2. Mr. Krebs, representing LTH,
said the best lots were those with visibility from Shelburne Road and that
he would not like to see lots 1 and 2 share an access from the new road,
since that would give all the Shelburne Road visibility to one lot. Mr.
Ewing felt the access to lot 1 should be more than 150' from Shelburne Road,
particularly since the Southern Connector will be coming through this area.
A_e did not feel 150' was a lot of space. Mr. Spitz said the original proposal
had been for lot 2 to have a right of way over lot 1. Mr. Larkin noted that
the firm now interested in lot 1 did not like that idea. It would mean his
entrance to the lot would be 4001.from Shelburne Road, and cars and trucks
would have to go up the hill to get to the access, and then down again to get
to the building. Mr. Poger said the Commission would prefer shared access.
Mr. Ewing suggested two curb cuts for lot 1 - 1 close to Shelburne Road for
entering traffic, and a second one for exiting, which could be shared with
lots 2 and 3. If this were done, the curbs on the entrance road would have
to be such that it could not be used by exiting traffic.
After further discussion, Mr. Poger stated that the entrance to lot 1
could be about 250' from Shelburne Road and that lots 2 and 3 could share
access at 400' from the road. Another way to do it would be an "in" only
curb -cut for lot 1 at 200-250' from the road, and the shared access for lots
2 and 3• Fie said he would prefer the first option.
Mr. Spitz felt it was very important that whoever bought the lots was
sure they could fit the use on them with the setback and coverage requirements
being met.
Mr. Poger noted that it was now 9:15 and that the Commission had 3
long items left. It was suggested that the last item be taken up at the
meeting next week.
Site plan and traffic criteria review of application by Green Mountain Power
Corporation for an office building to contain corporate headquarters on
Green Mountain Drive
Mr. Spitz said the applicants had received a height variance from the
City Council at last night's meeting.
p/1� 4.
PLANNING COMMen �V�I COMMISSION Gre` PDWO� ����� �uj'� AUGUST 3. 1982
Mr. Perry, representing GMP, said the lot was 13.2 acres and sloped.
The building will be concrete 29' high on the north and east, and bronze
deflective glass 42' high on the south and west walls, which will be staggered.
Mr. Perry said they had had a traffic study done by Dr. Oppenlander,
in regard to the intersection of Shelburne Road and Green Mountain Drive. The
study is based on every employee driving to work every day, which probably
will not occur - there will be some carpooling and absent employees. Work
hours are 8 to 5. so GMP will not coincide with the evening peak hour of the
road, which is 4-5pm. Mr. Perry said that with the lights as they are now,in�a few years
the level of service in the evening kill drop to D with or without this develop-
ment.;,-;Withlsome improvements to the intersection, the level of service can
be A. He said there was room for a through lane and a right turn lane going
north, but that there;woul&fhave�to''beasome road widening for improvements
to the lanes going south. He felt the intersection could be vastly improved
with little expense, but said they felt it should be designed by the State,
since it is a State road. The Southern Connector, of course, would make
changes to this section of road also. Mr. Perry wanted to postpone discussion
of the traffic issue until the State decided what to do with the road. Mr.
Spitz noted that the city could stipulate that the building not be occupied
until the issue was resolved. Mr. Ewing was afraid that would be hard to do,
and Mr. Poger suggested that a bond be posted for the highest estimate of the
cost of the road improvements. If it turns out that it is too much, some of
it can be returned to GNP when that is determined.
Mr. Perry said the ordinance required GMP to have 209 parking spaces.
110 are shown, with an area set aside for more parking if it becomes needed.
Mr. Walsh asked whether the glass would reflect sunlight onto the drivers
on Shelburne Road but was told it probably would not.
Mr. Perry said GMP would like to come back when planting plans are finalized.
He was told.those plans could be submitted to the Planner, but that if he
was not satisfied with them, GMP would have to come back and discuss it with
the Commission.
The question of the access road was discussed. Mr. Perry said the
Reikelt property had the right to put in a road within a 60' strip along the
border. -GMP does not want to tie into that right of way. They have no idea
what use might be made of that road in the future, or whether there would
even be one, and they do not want to move their road because of it. Mr. Spitz
noted that the Reikelt property did have access from Shelburne Road. Mr.
Perry noted that if there were two roads instead of both lots using one, they
would be 50' apart in the worst case. They do not want to move the planned
entrance road, because it would mean removing some trees and would change the
initial view of the building as one drove up to it. It might also mean relocating
some utilities and losing the screening between this lot and Meineke Muffler.
Mr. Perry said GMP would rather have a separate road, but if, when Reikelt built,
they would prefer to tie to the GMP road, it could be discussed at that time.
Mr. Poger said a right of way joining the Reikelt right of way to GMPs could
be shown on the plan and when the property is developed, both parties could
come before the Commission to discuss it. Mr. Schner felt it would not be good
to have the back entrance to another property jointly using GMP's access to
its corporate headquarters, and Mr. Mona proposed dropping the idea of joining
them.' This was agreed.
Mr. Dore, the .building architect, said the storm water would be put into
the brook in the area. There are 3 systems. The roof drains will go directly
into the brook and there will also be sheet drainage to the brook, but the
total volute of water will be reduced somewhat. Parking lot drainage will go
into catch -basins which will hold the first 112" of water. Any water above
5-
PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 3, 1982
that amount will go into the brook. The Commission noted that this drainage
would all end up going through the badly eroded area behind Shearer Chevrolet.
Mr. Poger said he did not want this building to make the problem worse. Mr.
Perry said site -plan criteria did not include this issue, but Mr. Walsh felt
that the Commission's charge included looking after the safety of the city, and
that this was an unsafe area. Mr. Poger felt the City Engineer should look
into the problem. Mr. Spitz said the problem was on private property, over
which the city had no easement. Mr. Perry said GMP could slow the flow of the
water, but it could not fix a problem on private property.
Mr. Spitz said the Comprehensive Plan showed a pedestrian trail connection
from Green Mountain Drive to the city park, but that the applicant did not
like that. Mr. Perry felt the time to require a trail had been when the
subdivision was approved. He felt that if they had a trail on the land,
everyone would be using their parking lot to get to it and it would present a
security problem to the building. He said GMP would be willing to work something
out in the future. They are having problems now with trail bikes and vandalism,
but would be willing to cooperate later. Mr. Poger said the city would like
a location shown on the plan now, and when the system is developed, this link
will join it. He suggested a floating trail, with the location to be fixed at
a later date. Mr. Perry objected that this was not a site -plan issue either.
He said GMP would like to put in the parking lot and see what use was made of
it before they had a trail in there.
Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve
the site plan application by Green Mountain Power Corporation for a building
on Green Mountain Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Green Mountain Power
Corporate Headquarters Building, prepared by Sargent, Webster Crenshaw and
Folev. dated July 13. 1982. subJect to the following stipulations:
1. A revised storm drainage plan to include the proper material to slow
the velocity of water. shall be submitted to and approved by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit.
2. A pedestrian trail connection to recreation land owned by the City
of South Burlington shall be shown on the site plan, at a location to Fe
-
approved by the City Planner. An easement and offer of dedication for the
trail shall e submitted to and approved by the City Attorney prior_tQ
issuance of a building permit.
3. Complete landscaping details and a landscapi
to and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance
bond shall be submitted
a building permit.
4. The area for future parking shall be revised to accurately reflect the
number of cars indicated.
5. Following discussion among the applicant, the City, and the Agency
of Transportation concerning improvements to the Shelburne Road and Green
Fountain Drive intersection, the Planning Commission may require a bond in
an amount to be determined y the City Planner for its share in the construction
of any needed improvements.
6. A revised site plan, containing required changes from stipulations 1
2, 3 and 4 shall be submitted o and approved by the ity Planner prior to
Issuance of a building permit.
PLANNING COMMISSION
6.
AUGUST 3. 1982
7. This approval expires in 6 months.
Mr. Jacob seconded the motion.
Mr. Perry noted that a lot of items were being required before a building
permit was issued, and he said they needed to begin construction soon. Mr.
Spitz said sometimes a site -work permit was issued.
The motion carried unanimously.
Sketch plan application by Valiant Construction Co. for consolidation of 5
parcels into e 5 acre PCD on Dorset Street across from University Mall
Mr. Jacob left at this time, stating that he had a conflict here.
Mr. Page represented VL Properties, Inc., who is the developer here.
He located the area and said the proposed access was near the secondary
access to University Mall. Five parcels of land will be consolidated. There
will be parking space for 300 cars. A traffic study is being done. Mr. Page
said most of the green space would be near the front of the lot, on Dorset St.
The bulk of the parking Will be in the middle of the lot, with supplementary
parking and service' accesses around the outside of the buildings. Mr. Poger
noted that traffic at the nearest signallized intersections would have to be
studied, and upgrading of them might be expensive.
Mr. Yoolery felt the islands would not work, and he was not sure the
circulation pattern was that good. Mr. Mona did not like the parking lot
arrangement. Mr. Poger did not encourage location of a grocery store in this
area.
Other business
The Commission suggested that the Planner send a letter to the proper
people informing them that the work at the Rotisserie had not been done and
that the city would have to do it.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:40 pm.
Clerk
GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION
ONE MAIN STREET, P. O. BOX 650
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402
802 /864 - 5731
October 29, 1982
David H. Spitz
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Subject: Site Plan Approval
Dear Mr. Spitz:
In accordance with two stipulations of Green .Mountain
Power Real Estate Corporation Site Plan Approval for
construction of its new building off Green Mountain Drive,
South Burlington, I have enclosed an Offer of Irrevocable
Dedication and Warranty Deed for. a 15 foot pedestrian
easement and a Payment Guarantee should. roadway improvements
at the intersection of Shelburne Road (U.S. Route 7) and
Green Mountain Drive in South .Burlington commence.
I trust these will meet with your approval and a
site plan permit will be issued the first of next week. If
something in the enclosures is not to your understanding,
please contact Attorney Robert Perry, Perry & Schmucker, or
John Dore, Sargent, Webster Crenshaw & Folley, both of
South Burlington. I will be out of town Monday and Tuesday,
but either of these gentlemen should be able to answer any
questions.
Sincerely,
l r,
r
Walter S. Oakes
Director,
Corporate Services
cc: Robert Perry, Esq.
John Dore, AIA
Douglas Hyde, Esq.
OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION
Agreement made this day of , 1982,
by and between GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION (hereinafter referred
to as "OWNER") and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON (hereinafter
referred to as "CITY").
WITNESSETH:
a
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has approved a Plan
for the Green Mountain Power Corporation corporate headquarters
situated on Lot 17 of the National Life Insurance Subdivision as
shown on a plan prepared by Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley
dated ; and
WHEREAS, said site plan approval by the Planning Commission
required dedication of a trail easement, extending from Green
Mountain Drive to land owned by the CITY; and
WHEREAS, the above described trail easement is to be
dedicated to the CITY, free and clear of all encumbrances,
pursuant to said site plan approval; and
WHEREAS, the OWNER has dc]i.vered a deed of conveyance to the
CITY for said trail easement..
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Oity Planning
Commission's final approval and in further consideration of the
sum of One Dollar in lawful money paid by the CITY to the OWNER {
and other good and valuable consideration, it is convenanted and
agreed as follows:
PERRY & SCHMUCKER 1. The OWNER herewith delivers to the CITY a Warranty Deed
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1460 WILLISTON ROAD for the premises described in Exhibit A attached hereto, said
P. O. BOX 2626
SOUTH B.URLINGTON.
VERMONT 05402
1
PERRY & SCHMUCKER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1480 WILLISTON ROAD
P. 0. BOX 2323
SOUTH BURLINGTON.
VERMONT 05402
delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the CITY to be
held by the CITY until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer
of Dedication by the council of the CITY.
2. The OWNER agrees that said formal Offer of Dedication
I
is irrevocable and can be accepted by the CITY at any time.
3. Notwithstanding the specific designation of the trail
easement, OWNER and CITY acknowledge that it may be in the best i
interest of both parties to relocate the easement. OWNER
therefore, reserves the right to relocate the easement subject to
approval by the City Planner, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld. Further, should trail use result in
vandalism or damage to propE!rty of OWNER or its employees, the
CITY shall in good faith act on a request of the OWNER for the
termination or relocation of: the trail easement. In the event of
an approved relocation, the easement described in Exhibit A shall
terminate and the parties shall exchange deeds to relinquish the
former easement and establish the new easement.
4. This irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the
land and shall be binding upon Lli assigns, granitees, successors
and/or heirs of the OWNER.
IN THE PRESENCE OF: OWNER
GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
CITY
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
L.
STATE OF VERMONT
CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS.
At South Burlington, Vermont, this day of
1982, personally appeared
and he acknowledged this instrument by him signed and sealed to
be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of the GMP
REAL ESTATE CORPORATION.
Before me,
Notary Public
STATE OF VERMONT
CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS.
At South Burlington, Vermont, this _ day of
, 1982, personally appears -a
and he acknowledged this instrument by him signed and sealed to
be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF
SOUTH BURLINGTON.
Before me,
PERRY & SCHMUCKER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1480 WILLISTON ROAD
P. 0. BOX 2323
SOUTH BURLINGTON.
VERMONT 05402
Notary Public
of Burlington
and State of Vermont
------TEN AND MORE
paid to its full satisfaction by
CITY OF SOUTH DURLINGTON, a
under the laws of the State
in the County of Chittenden
Grantor , in the consideration of
Dollars
Municipal Corporation organized
of Vermont,
o South Burlington in the County of Chittenden
and State of Vermont Grantee by these presents, do
freely Blur. Grant. Orll, (ranueu AnD (gonfirm un'tu the eaid Grant
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors
a)i8xxxxxxxxxxU and assigns forever, a
certain piece of land in South Burlington in the
County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as
follows, viz:
An easement for pedestrian and non -motorized traffic 15
feet in width extending from Green Mountain Drive along the
northerly boundary line of land of the Grantor to land of
the within Grantee, a-s shown on a Plan prepared by Sargent,
Webster, Crenshaw & Folley dated which Plan has
been filed with the planning office of the Grantee.
The Grantor, its successors and assigns shall have no
responsibility for construction, maintenance or supervision
of said trail and by acceptance of this deed, the Grantee
agrees to hold the Grantor, its successors and assigns
harmless from any liability for personal injury, including
death, and property damage arising from the use of said
trail.
Grantor acquired the property by Warranty Deed of
National Life Insurance Company dated August 20, 1975, as
recorded in Volume 126 at Pages 10-12 of the City of South
Burlington Land Records.
Reference is hereby made to the above Pland and deed,
the records thereof and the references therein contained, in
further aid of this description.
011 Mur xn0 In TILMD said granted premises,
purtenances thereof, to the said Grantee
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors
Heft and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever;
.gnd it the said Grantor
GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
for itself and its succesEkdrs,
executors and administrators, do covenant with the said Grantee
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors
helm and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is
the sole owner of the premises, and have -dood ri-dht and title to conveu the
same in manner aforesaid, that they are Nrer Nrnm EvrrLi Enrumbraurr:
except as stated in the description
I
hereby engage to Warrant Anb Drfrnb the same against all lawful claims
whatever,
+lit lVitnrKu Mhrrrnf. I hereunto set my hand and seal
this day of September .1. D. 19 82.
?Ili PC1'y1'ttil' Of
GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
M,
State (Of Vermont, ,qt Burlington this
Tauntu of Chittenden
}8s. day of September .4. D. 19 82
GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument, by
him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed, and
the free act and deed of GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION.
Before me
Notary Public
(Title)
0 N a � I o
I
SITE PLAN
EEN_MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATE I HEADQUARTERS BUILDING'
I-
DHS
8/3/82
For the Site Plan Application by Green Mountain Power Corporation for a
building on Green Mountain Drive as depicted on a plan entitled "Green Mountain
Power Corporate Headquarters Building," prepared by Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw
& Foley, dated July 13, 1982.
Stipulations:
1) A revised storm drainage plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit.
2) A pedestrian trail connection from Green Mountain Drive to recreation land owned
by the City of South Burlington shall be shown on the site plan, at a location
to be approved by the City Planner. An easement and offer of dedication for
the trail shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney.
3) Complete landscaping details and a landscaping bond shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a building permit.
4) The area for future parking shall be revised to accurately reflect the
number of cars indicated.
5) Following discussion among the applicant, the City, and the Agency of
Transportation concerning improvements to the Shelburne Road and Green Mountain
Drive intersection, the Planning Commission may require the applicant to
participate in the construction of any needed improvements. Site plan review
of this issue shall be continued and shall be resolved prior to occupancy of
the building.
6) A revised site plan, containing required changes from stipulations 1, 2,
3, and 4, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to
issuance of a building permit.
7) This approval expires in 6 months.
a
Date Race i ve d By
Date Application Completed and Received
By By
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE -NUMBER OF:
(a) Owner of Record GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
(b) Applicant GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION
(c) Contact Person ROBERT J. PERRY
2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE, BOX 17, SO. BURLINGTON
3) PROPOSED USE(S) : OFFICE BUILDING FOR GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION
HEADQUARTERS.
4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e.,' # of units, floor area, etc.) THREE STORY OFFICE
RTTTT,T)TNG
5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 120
6) COST ESTIMATES: Unknown at present
(a) Buildings
(b) Landscaping
(c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work)
7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE FALL 1983
Commercial 4; visitors 48; employees 200
8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out)
9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Peak traffic 7:30 - 8:00
5:00 - 5 : 3 0
10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION MONDAY TTERO.UGH FRIDAY _
GREEN TAI POWER CORAT
By:
DATE SIG O APPLI1
Robert J. Perry
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
V4*PQq%-W- SKETCH PLAN
q'�
1) Name, address, and phone number of: �'�`� � PqS
1 (00
a. Owner of record GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION �0p4(&
b. Applicant GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION
c. Contact person ROBERT J . PERRY
2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including
number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s).
GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER corporate headquarters
3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc)
•
4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties KURT REICHELT,
MARK HILL INVESTMENTS, INC., PIZZAGALLI REALTY, U.V.M., CITY OF
SOUTH BURLINGTON
5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements,
covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Sewer easement from Pheasant Way
to Green Mountain Drive encumbers the southerly and westerly boundary
areas.
6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities
such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.
Cut in onl
7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or
by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub-
division, and include the dates of such actions:
National Life Insurance Company obtained subdivision approval for
the 17-lot subdivision.
8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information:
1) Name of owners of.record of contiguous properties.
2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of
record and (b) proposed subdivision.
3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of
existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove-
nants.
4) 'Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets,
utilities, and open space.
I
5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic).
6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property
and surrounding area.
(Signature) applicant or contactfp6rson
4 0W 1176Zr
date
TRAFFIC DATA
A survey of commercial traffic taken during the week of
May 24, 1982, revealed an average of two (2) deliveries per day,
with the earliest arrival 11:10 A.M. and the latest arrival
3:35 P.M. Two (2) of the deliveries were by tractor -trailer
and eight (8) of the deliveries were by straight frame truck.
A survey of visitor traffic during the week of May 28,
revealed an average of 23.6 visitors per day, with a low of
seventeen (17) and a high of thirty-four (34) visitors.
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: David H. Spitz, City Planner
Re: Next week's agenda items
Date: 10/8/82
2) Green Mountain Power
Please note stipulation 5 from the site plan approval dated 8/3/82. Since
that time the following has taken place:
a) The Agency of Transportation has conceptually approved with minor re-
visions the intersection modifications proposed by Joe Oppenlander.
b) The Agency has indicated it anticipates no State money to help pay for
the modifications.
c) Cost estimates for the modifications are now being prepared. One pre-
liminary estimate is $50,000.
I see two options. First, GMP can be asked to pay for all improvements
despite their relatively small inpact on the problem. The justification is
that they are the only major contributor to that intersection in the foreseeable
future.
Second, GMP can be asked to pay only a portion. Under this option money
would probably be kept in escrow for several years until sufficient funds were
available.
3) Homestead Design
Proposal is for 6 lots on approximately 5.8 acres on Bartletts Bay Road.
This is the area behind the sewer plant that was recently changed from R3 to
Rl by the City Council on the proposed zoning map.
Several issues should be addressed.
A shared private drive is proposed to serve 4 of the 6 lots. Under the
proposed zoning ordinance, the Planning Commission may approve up to 3 lots
on a private street. Even though some roads in this area are less than current
City standards, Brigham Road was recently upgraded to 30 feet with curbs. I
would recommend the same here.
The proposed drive is located so as to permit future extension to Holmes
Road. This is valuable whether or not the Southern Connector is built because
the abutting David Farrell parcel has no direct access onto Holmes Road or
Bartletts Bay Road. Because of the potential extension, a temporary turn -around
should be sufficient.
The two lots fronting on Bartletts Bay Road are not ideally located due to
proximity to the sewer plant. The best result would be clustering of all lots
jte
: 1795 WILLISTON ROAD
&re2Amf AwSOUTH
VEERMONT 051,
401TON
(802) 863-1428
SARGENT
CI N' 1HAW
Sr FO.
ARCHITECTS ■ ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS
3 May 1983
avid H. Spitz
sty of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street Vermont 05401
South Burlington,
Green Mountain Power Corporate Headquarters
Re:
SWC&F Project No. 82-307
Subject: Planting Redesign
Dear Mr. Spitz:
the landscape architectural designer for t
he
Dennis Judi development
Green Mountain Power project, has reviewed the
of the budgetary changes regarding the planting design.
The following is a summary of his findings.
the in place costs Of the planting
As initially designed, requirement by almost
scheme exceeded your percentage
thirty percent, at $52,866. Due to budget constraints,
however, Green Mountain Power Corporation was forceoximately
to reduce the scope of planting to $17,500, lance,
forty percent of your requirement. This, at first g
creates a deficiency of $23,500.
Mr. Jud would submit, however, that the location of the
building directly incorporated the inherent value of the
plant materials. Any assessment of overall results
existing p trees. Even the
must consider the value of these existing
inch diameter
most conservative of estimates, pine trees
of trunk would place the value of just those p roximately
in the immediate vicinity Of the main entlnectreesaon the
$36,400. There are over fifty of these p'
site excluding the perimeter wooded areas. The desiggnnp al
so
calls for the transplanting of fifty-eight existing
pines, cherries and birch at an approximate value of $5800.
PARTNERS
EDWIN B. BRUCE, AIA
ARTHUR C. FRIEDEL, JR., AIA
HERBERT BOERNER, AIA
ARTHUR V. SERRANO, IR, PE
MICHAEL J. GREENLEE, AIA
ROBERT L KELLY, AIA
ARNOLD A. BITTERMAN, PE
WILLIAM E. MARKLEY, AIA
KENNETH R. BECKER, RLA
ASSOCIATES
JOHN H. DEIERLEIN, AIA
ROGER E. KAHN, AIA
JOHN L. SALINSKY, PE
SALVATORE A. CATALANO, AIA
GEORGE H. HAYES, AIA, PE
RICHARD T. LAFFERTY, AIA
JORGE VILLAU, PE
WARREN R. FERGUSON, RLA
RICHARD A. HAUI'T, PE
CAUXTO J. SUAREZ, PE
HAROLD E. SPATH, SR.
L. DOUGLAS STONER
EUGENE L. TUCKER, AIA
R. JOHN DORE, AIA
BRUCE W. COLE, CSI
CONSULTANTS
D. KENNETH SARGENT, FAIA
FREDERICK S. WEBSTER, FAIA
THOMAS T. CRENSHAW, AIA
MILO D. FOLLEY, AIA
DARREL D. RIPPETEAU, FAIA
ROBERT W. MALMROS, AIA
NEW YORK
SYRACUSE
WATERTOWN
BUFFALO
VERMONT
BURLINGTON
MAINE
BANGOR
� �7e
GI ��„Mt Pow, 1795 WILLISTON ROAD
SOUTH BURLINGTON,
VERMONT 05401
(802) 863-1428
3 May 1983
Mr. David H. Spitz
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Green Mountain Power Corporate Headquarters
SWC&F Project No. 82-307
Subject: Planting Redesign
Dear Mr. Spitz:
Dennis Jud, the landscape architectural designer for the
Green Mountain Power project, has reviewed the development
of the budgetary changes regarding the planting design.
The following is a summary of his findings.
SARGENT
0 CCREAW
& FOLLEY
ARCHITECTS ■ ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS
PARTNERS
EDWIN B. BRUCE, AIA
ARTHUR C. FRIEDEL, JR., AIA
HERBERT BOERNER, AIA
ARTHUR V. SERRANO, JR., PE
MICHAEL J. GREENLEE, AIA
ROBERT L. KELLY, AIA
ARNOLD A. BITTERMAN, PE
WILLIAM E. MARKLEY, AIA
KENNETH R. BECKER, RLA
As initially designed, the in place costs of the planting
scheme exceeded your percentage requirement by almost
thirty percent, at $52,866. Due to budget constraints,
however, Green Mountain Power Corporation was forced
to reduce the scope of planting to $17,500, or approximately
forty percent of your requirement. This, at first glance,
creates a deficiency of $23,500.
Mr. Jud would submit, however, that the location of the
building directly incorporated the inherent value of the
existing plant materials. Any assessment of overall results
must consider the value of these existing trees. Even the
most conservative of estimates, $100.00 per inch diameter
of trunk would place the value of just those pine trees
in the immediate vicinity of the main entrance at approximately
$36,400. There are over fifty of these pine trees on the
site excluding the perimeter wooded areas. The design also
calls for the transplanting of fifty-eight existing maples,
pines, cherries and birch at an approximate value of $5800.
ASSOCIATES
JOHN H. DEIERLEIN, AIA
ROGER E. KAHN, AIA
JOHN L. SALINSKY, PE
SALVATORE A. CATALANO, AIA
GEORGE H. HAYES, AIA, PE
RICHARD T. LAFFERTY, AIA
JORGE VILLAU, PE
WARREN R. FERGUSON, RLA
RICHARD A. HAUPT, PE
CALIXTO 1. SUAREZ, PE
HAROLD E. SPATH, SR.
L. DOUGLAS STONER
EUGENE L. TUCKER, AIA
R. JOHN DORE, AIA
BRUCE W. COLE, CSI
CONSULTANTS
D. KENNETH SARGENT, FAIA
FREDERICK S. WEBSTER, FAIA
THOMAS T. CRENSHAW, AIA
MILO D. FOLLEY, AIA
DARREL D. RIPPETEAU, FAIA
ROBERT W. MALMROS, AIA
NEW YORK
SYRACUSE
WATERTOWN
BUFFALO
VERMONT
BURLINGTON
MAINE
BANGOR
Mr. David Spitz
3 May 1983
Page 2
We believe that the final results of the landscape architectural
design comfortably exceeds the requirements of and is in full compliance
with the spirit of your regulation.
Very truly yours,
SARGENT-WEBSTER-CRENSHAW & FOLLEY
Arc 'tec Engineers Planners
R. Jo n Dore, IA
Proj ct Manager
DV /dk
cc: Walter Oakes
ELT
DVJ
File
PAYMENT GUARANTEE
WHEREAS, GMP Real Estate Corporation has received site
plan approval for construction of an office building on Lot 17
oft Green P-iountain Drive from the City of South Burlington
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, final approval was subject to an assessment
for hiqhway improvements at the Route 7 - Green Mountain Drive
intersection in the form of a letter of credit;
FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION RECEIVED, GMP Real
Estate Corporation hereby promises to pay to the City of South
Burlington a base sum of Five Thousand and 110/100 Dollars
($5,000.00) to be increased by five percent (5%) per year on a
non -compounded basis, added on the annual anniversary date of
this guarantee, within fifteen (15) days of demand for payment
by the municipal manager of the City of South Burlington,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Said sum shall be used only for roadway improve-
ments at the intersection of Shelburne Road (U. S. Route 7) and
Green Mountain Drive in the City of South Burlington. Improve-
ments shall not include maintenance costs.
2. Demand for payment shall not be made until
commencement of construction.
3. In the event demand has not been made prior to
November 1, 1987, the South Burlington Planning Commission shall
review the contribution requirement and either terminate the
obligation or continue the obligation for an additional term not
to exceed five (5) years.
The foregoing guarantee shall not be subject to any
defenses or setoffs except those arising from conditions number
1, 2 and 3 above.
DATED at Burlington, Vermont, this 3rd day of
November, 1982.
GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Duly Authorized Ag n,
2
PAYMENT GUARANTEE
WHEREAS, GMP Real Estate Corporation has received site
plan approval for construction of an office building on Lot 17
off Green Mountain Drive from the City of South Burlington
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, final approval was subject to an assessment
for highway improvements at the Route 7 - Green Mountain Drive
intersection in the form of a letter of credit;
FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION RECEIVED, GMP Real
Estate Corporation hereby promises to pay to the City of South
Burlington a base sum of Five Thousand and no/100 Dollars
($5,000.00) to be increased by five percent (5%) per year on a
non -compounded basis, added on the annual anniversary date of
this guarantee, within fifteen (15) days of demand for payment
by the municipal manager of the City of South Burlington,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Said sum shall be used only for roadway improve-
ments at the intersection of Shelburne Road (U. S. Route 7) and
Green Mountain Drive in the City of South Burlington. Improve-
ments shall riot include maintenance costs.
2. Demand for payment shall not be made until
commencement of construction.
3. In the event demand has not been made prior to
November 1, 1937, the South Burlington Planning Commission shall
review the contribution requirement and either terminate the
obligation or continue the obligation for an additional term not
to exceed five (5) years, provided, however, that no additional
interest will accrue during the additional term.
The foregoing guarantee shall not be subject to any
defenses or setoffs except those arising from conditions number
1, 2 and 3 above.
DATED at Burlington, Vermont, this 29th day of
October, 1982.
GMP REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
By:
4ulyhorized gen
- 2 -
RICHARD A. SPOKES
JAMES D. FOLEY
JOSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI
STEVEN F. STITZEL
SPOKES, POKEY & 01BUCHOWSKI
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
184 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE
P. O. BOX SS6
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0986
October 18, 1982
t
i
Mr. David H. Spitz ,
Planning Commissioner
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: GMP Real Estate Corporation Pedestrian Easement
Dear David:
(802) 862-645,
(802) 863-2857
ISAAC N. P. STOKES
COUNSEL
A proposed Offer of Dedication and Easement Deed submitted by
Attorney Perry by memo dated October 8, 1982 are in satisfactory
form. I have only one suggestion, and that is to more specifically
identify the plan referred to in paragraph one of the deed.
By copy of this
letter
and date, asking
peBhapsPerry
referftoeacrecoadedify
the plan by legend
plan.
Very truly yours,
Richard A. Spokes
RAS:mi1
cc: Robert J. Perry, Esq.
m RE Y
F,ono son. inc. R
\\ INDUSTRIAL -TRUCK -CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES
SO. BARRE, VT 05670 • 802/479-0101
ME
2
ERo Black a Becker®
HEAVY DUTY POWER TOOLS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL
Production Air Tools for Industrial and Construction
. P/ -. n � 7/, 915
arc
L s
_
,3t_r/
?
rU
_6rL
.
+H.)5-
-7o
17
S
/
3a/
g
Q
A
s
S
7:-�o
r �-
9'�
3
r
19
23
----------------
� - -----
J j^,,
13
ao1 5
7
as
a�
1
-44
13
3/..
L
P 33
!a
ot
3739
�t lea r
'; 8
aG 3
39
6
i
11
0
ROBERT J. PERRY
RONALD C. SCHMUCKER
PERRY & SCHMUCKER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1480 WILLISTON ROAD
P. O. BOX 2323
SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402
NEMORANDUM
TO: RICHARD A. SPOKES, ESQ.
pokes, Foley & O'J-,uchowski
P.O. Box 986
Burlington, Vermont 05402
and
DAVID H. SPiTZ
Planning Commissioner
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
FROM: ROBERT J. PERRY, ESQ.
DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1902
Enclosed please find copies of the following:
TELEPHONE 863-4558
AREA CODE 802
1. Warranty Deed from G14P Real Estate Corporation to
City of South Eurlingtoh; and
2. Offer of Irrevocable Dedication between GMP Real Estate
Corporation and City of South Burlington.
lmbr
FITZI"A'rmCK-LLEWEI_LYN ASSOCIATES
Engineering and Planning Services
edlu_ /
";o 0A
PREPARED BY -_-_oArs2V__-u"sc*eo____�____.
_- o�
SUBJECT ___F-F1CU1/L1UzM<C[_- SOF
' / /
ci
:14
17
-affLI
4.
V i
1 4-
IT
37
LI
AA
wr
: 4i
73
'�-Krflc AL IYOV���IVT
Use. 19 00 � W 6,— �Yub, �k
2,,,3
Oct
et 7UQ-7
4s�d
TO
znc- 'U
ci
4p-
JOWev
VL-
L
/00/
�os A�x r ,)
MAIN OFFICE
W30 SHELBURNE R?.
P.O. BOX 928
.!i:LINGTON, W. 05401
PHONE 802 -- 658-1' '•.
i
RUTLAND OFFIC'
270 SOUTH MAIN S.
P.O. BOX 400
RUTLAND, VT. 05701
PHONE 802 - 775- .:;'3
VA.L PREDA LTASING� INC.
Daily and earij, Rentals
�_R
Ito ,, a -I
June 14, 1982
59 AIRPORT.":.r7
SO. BURLING2C117, VT. 0-- ,
City of South Burlington
Planning Commission
575 Dorset Street
So. Burlington, Vt. 05401
w
attn: PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
0 After your hearing on May 25, 1982, regarding approval
of a rental facility for Val Breda Leasing, I was presented
with a list of stipulations that I was not prepared to
answer. The stipulations given to me were written and
dated a day prior to the meeting. I would appreciate the
opportunity to present our views of these stipulations to
the commission.
In answer to stipulation number 1, our engineers, Dona',,-J
Hamlim, consulting engineers, Inc., cannot find a valid
reason for installing the pipe requested. Mr. Leonard
Lamoureux, the engineer working on this project is willing
to present his findings to the planning commission.
Stipulation number 2 is not a problem if it,,i:s the normal
procedure.
Stipulation number 3 states that only cars rented at this
facility can be sold there. However, in the statement
before the stipulations, I was quoted as saying that the
new building "will be mainly a service and office facility".
The bulk of our rentals will be from another facility.
We would like to sell any of our fleet cars at this new
location. Buying and dispensing of cars is a major part
of the car rental business. In oneyear we might change
our -:..,retire fleet to meet competition or customer demand.
STATE OF VERMONT
AGENCY OF TRANSPORTA,rjON__
133 State Street, Administration Building
Montpelier, Vermont 05602
September 13, 1982
Dana Cole -Levesque
Land Use Administrator
Agency of Environmental Consei--ation
Montpelier, Vent 05602 Re: Act 250 04C0094-2
Dear Mr. Cole -Levesque
The Agency has further studied the impact of the developer's
proposal off Green Mountain Drive in the City of Burlington.
Inasmuch as the proposal accesses a local road, Green Mountain
Drive, the Agency cannot require modification at curb cuts. The
Agency does, however, wish to brinq to the District Environmental
Ccrgnission's attention that any additional development off from or
directly onto Shelburne Road, (Route US 7) which is a State High-
way, will serve to add to the congested levels which presently
exist.
Additionally, there are no currently sponsored AQenoy plans
to upgrade Route US 7 in the vicinity in question.
Sincerely,
S J, qat(je_ P.F.
S. J. Gage
Director of
Engineering and Construction
SJG•JERL:as
cc: Roper Perry
JER Landis
so- File
August 5, 1982
Attorney Robert Perry
Perry & Schmucker
1480 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Bob,
Enclosed is a copy�of the South Burlington Planning Commission's final
approval with stipulations for Green Mountain Power Corporation's headquarters
on Green Mountain Drive.
Because of the length and complexity of stipulations, it was the Planning
Canunission's intention to allow you to begin site work without getting a complete
building permit. Please contact Zoning Administrator Richard Ward to discuss
timing and procedure.
Sincerely,
David H. Spitz,
City Planner
DS/Mcg
1 Encl
PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 12, 1982
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday,
October 12, 1982 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St.
Members Present
Sidney Poger, Chairman; John Belter, Kirk Woolery, George Mona, Mary -Barbara
Maher
Members Absent
Peter Jacob, Robert Walsh
Others Present
David Spitz, Planner; Judy Hurd, The Other Paper; J.R. Zimmerman, Joseph
Stevens, Norman Myers, Judy & Jerry Huetz, Duncan Case, William Shearer,
Louise & Bruce Mozdehi, Frank & Mary Anne Murray, Edmund Smith, Norma Unsworth,
Lee Liggett, Robert Perry, Fred Demer
Minutes of September 28, 1982
The September 28, 1982 minutes were approved on a motion by Mr. Woolery,
a second by Mr. Belter, and a unanimous vote. -
Discussion of street improvements related to Green Mountain Power development
i
Mr. Poger noted that copies of the August 3, 1982 minutes had been sent
to the members to remind them of what had been decided on this issue at that
meeting.
Mr. Mona arrived at this time.
Mr. Spitz said that he had been looking at cost estimates for improvement
of the intersection. City traffic consultant Dr. Oppenlander designed one
improvement and the State highway department designed another, which Dr.
Oppenlander feels is excessive. Dr. Oppenlander's design would probably cost
S20,000, while the State's would be closer to $95-100,000. Mr. Spitz said
GXIP would add a fairly small amount of traffic to that intersection. He
said there were no other major developments expected in that area, and added
that neither the State nor the city has any plans or any money for improvements
to the intersection. Fie noted that GMP could contribute some money now, but
it probably would not be used for several years. He mentioned an amount of
610,000.
Mr. Perry, representing GMP, said the problem was not with the number of
cars, but was with the three-phase signal and the lack of another turning lane.
He noted that the cost of reworking the signal was very low. He added that
as far as Green Mountain Power's contribution to traffic, using 1988 figures,
at the a.m. peak they would provide 30% of the turning movements and in the
evening it would be 26%. The rest of the day it is negligible. Using the worst
case for GMP, for those two peak hours of the day, in 1988, they would add less
than 3% to the total traffic. He said GMP was willing to make a contribution,
such as $5,000, which he felt was their share of the worst case traffic, but he
felt the time of the contribution should be limited and he suggested that it be
handled via a letter of credit.
Mr. Poger noted that this case was different from previous cases because
this is a State road and because no improvements were scheduled within a certain
time here. Mr. Woolery felt a letter of credit would be all right, since it was
2.
PLANNING COMMISSION OCT,;BER 12, 1982
unlikely that the building would chanr:e hands. Mr. Spitz noted that a letter
of credit did not keep pace with inflation. He was asked how he had arrived
at the suggested figure of $10�000 and said that he had looked at other
examples recently and how much they had paid per peak hour car. Using the
same ratio would have come to a figure of $5,000 to $6,000, but this case is
geared toward one intersection only.
Mr. Poger was uneasy about requesting a contribution toward intersection
improvements which might not be made for 5-15 years, during which time GIMP
would be adding to traffic at the intersection. He felt that in this case,
perhaps the money should be given back after 5 years, or none should be
requested at all. Mr. Mona did not agree. Mr. Woolery noted that money had
been requested for traffic improvements from every major development recently
and he felt that procedure should be followed here, for consistency.
Mr. Belter suggested adding an interest rate to the letter of credit.
Mr. Mona moved that the South Burlington Planning; Commission accent
a_$5,000 assessment from Green Mountain Power -Corporation for road improvements
in the Shelburne Road -Green Mountain Drive intersection area. This assessment
to be received in a letter of credit which will grow at the rate of 5 per
year. There shall be an automatic Planning Commission review after 5 years
Mr. Woolery seconded the motion.
Mr. Poger was uneasy with this because the city has no power to improve
that State road, nor do they have specific improvements in mind for it. He
stated that while he would not vote against it, he could neither vote for it.
The motion carried with 4 in favor and Mr. Poger abstaining.
Sketch plan review of application by Homestead Design, Inc., for a 6 lot
subdivision on Bartlett's Bay Road
Mr. Mona stated that he had been delayed tonight by the police department,
which had told him that Mr. Robert Marcellino had called and told them that he
would not be able to come in tonight. Mr. Spitz said the sketch plan would be
rescheduled.
Site plan review of application by Village Green Apartments for 30 carports
to serve existing residential units
Mr. Spitz said the units and drives existed and that no change in land-
scaping was proposed. The application was granted two variances from the
Zoning Board. One was a side yard variance, so that they could take down as
few trees as possible, and the other was a setback from the stream in the
area. There will be one carport plus some storage per unit, as well as some
open spaces. There will be no fewer parking spaces than before. The Fire
Chief has seen the plan and does not object. Mr. Spitz said there was a
pedestrian trail shown in the Comprehensive Plan in this area. Mrs. Unsworth,
speaking for the development, said she did not object to such a trail and Mr.
Mona said it should be noted on the plan of record.
Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the
site elan ann,linAtinn by Vi l 1pva (upon Gnor+mcnta fnr 'fin nflrr.nrtc .+ 7F T7inooi „v.
ments," prepa
stipulations:
1. An offer of dedication for a 15 foot wide pedestrian trail easement
along the north side of the drainageway shall be submitted prior to issuance
of a building permit. The easement shall also be marked on the site plan and
SARGENT-WEBSTER-CRENSHAW & FOLLEY Architects Engineers Planners
1795 Williston Road, So. Burlington, VT 05401
Re: Green Mountain Power Corporate Headquarters Date: 26 July 1982
SWC&F Project No. 82-307 RJD/dk
Re: ACT 250
Core of Vision - Visual Access - Sheet V.1 12 July 1982
1) The visual access shown along Route 7 is primarily a result of opaque objects
in the field of vision of an observer (i.e. building). Where a view is
terminated by deciduous vegetation only (not including existing grade
elevations), the view is indicated by horizontal lines. In this case, the
building may be seen in a continuously interrupted fashion through leafless
trees, if one looks for it.
2) If the study were to incorporate only a moving core of vision study, the
building would be visually inaccessible according to accepted criteria and
parameters. At an observer speed of 40 mph the central core of vision is
370, and the peripheral core of vision is 600, for the driver of the car.
The focal point is 1100, which is also the rough limit of the "middle ground"
of the view. The limit of "foreground" the practical limits of the
perception of any detail, is 8001.
Under these conditions, the building is visually inaccessible to the driver
of a motor vehicle, from either direction. (Notice that at the intersection
of Green Mountain Drive and Route 7, where a driver would be stationary and
able to look around, the view of Green Mountain Power Corporate Headquarters
is blocked by an existing building.
M E M O R A N D U M
FROM: David H. Spitz, City Planner
TO: South Burlington Planning Commission
RE: Next Week's Agenda
DATE: July 30, 1982
While the number of summer meetings has been reduced, applications
fairly heavy. Please expect a long meeting on Tuesday and/or continuation
to next Tuesday, August 10. The subsequent meeting will be August 24.
3. Rebecca Square
remain
of hearings
One of the requirements for a residential PUD is a minimum total area of 5 acres.
If the front lot in this subdivision is developed for office use, the remaining
acreage will no longer qualify for a PUD. Several dimensional changes, would be
required for the rear lots.
Instead, the applicant would not like to give us his recent office use approval
(see attached letter), and to replace it with up to 12 apartment units with access.
to Williston Road. This access arrangement is consistent with the last Planning
Commission discussion on this application. Since the applicant wis.hes to develop
the single-family units quickly, the specific layout for the apartments will be
presented at a later date. A stipulation will be needed (the City Attorney has
been consulted) to make the PUD approval contingent on residential use only.
This application has already received preliminary plat approval. The only change
for this revised preliminary plat is an expansion of the front lot on which the
apartments are to be built. Also, the one other lot on Williston Road, previously
subdivided by Emery Victory and now owned by LTH Associates, may be modified
exact dimensions need to be resolved.
4. Bartlett Property - Commercial Lots
The application is for the first three commercial lots. The applicant i.s proposing
two of those lots with frontage on Shelburne Road but with access on to the new road.
I have suggested that a shared access and joint right-of-way would b.e the most
feasible. However, the applicant is proposing separate access points with one lot
containing a 40 foot wide "handle" on to the new road. This arrangement does not
comply with minimum frontage requirements.
Site plans will be presented later by the prospective buyers. I would advise that
these uses be carefully received to ensure that the proposed 80,000 square foot lots
are sufficient for their operations.
5. GMP Headquarters
Applicants are attempting to initiate construction quickly. Most site plan submitted,
but several items of information and issues must still be completed.
LANDSCAPING: General landscaping information is included. Specific tree sizes
and location and overall cost will not be ready until later in the construction
phase.
PARKING: The ordinance requirement is for 200 cars for this size building.
Apparently, the applicant needs far fewer spaces - 100 are shown. In addition,
an area's reserved for future parking spaces, if needed. This procedure is fine,
however, the reserved area is too small for the number of spaces indicated.
Either the area should be enlarged, or the number should be reduced to whatever
is realistically needed for future occupancy.
ACCESS: The access point for this project is satisfactory. However, it is only
50 feet away from a right-of-way to an adjacent vacant parcel. Green Mountain
Power's desire to have an access solely for their own use is understandable,
but the result would be two fairly major access points onto Green Mountain Drive
approximately 50 feet apart. Other options should be explored.
TRAFFIC: A traffic impact report has been submitted indicating that level -of -
service at the Shelburne Road intersection will be below C within a few years
unless adjustments are made. The intersection is under the State's jurisdiction
and any changes must be approved by them. Green Mountain Power's contribution to
the overall traffic is relatively small however, the CI-C2 provisions require
that their participation in any needed improvements be received.
I do not expect that the various parties will be able to agree on needed traffic
improvements by Tuesday's meeting. Even though several issues remain I would
IIkP to arromodata Ample dacirn +n mnvn n.k-;,f 1. I�,..," _i_-.1
-- - w owvc yusi.nij. FCIIMPpJ a p01-Lidl site plan
approval is possible. The one issue that may affect construction and that should
be resolved immediately is the location of the access road.
6. Valiant, Dorset St.
This application is perhaps only the second true Planned Commercial Development
proposal since the ordinance went into effect 22 years ago.
Five small parcels on Dorset Street across from the southerly University Mall
entrance will be combined into one development. Several buildings are proposed.
Uses are still speculative but could include retail, supermarkets, banks, rest-
aurant, etc.
Review process for this "commercial complex" consists of the full subdivision
procedure plus traffic criteria. Careful analysis of road conditions, of course,
will be necessary. It will be desireable to tie in requirements for this project
with Corporate Circle and University Mall expansion as well as the City's plans
for Dorset Street. One access point onto Dorset Street is proposed for the develop-
ment; it is likely that traffic signals will be required.
7. Sheraton Inn
This application has received Zoning Board approval for a "multiple" us.e. A
description of the recreational facility and how it will be used is enclosed.
Based on that description, an estimated 60 total trips (in plus out) per day
would be added to the 30,000 + current trips per day on this portion of Willistion
Road.
Regarding traffic impact, the application is similar to the recent Holiday Inn
expansion. In that case, a small fee was required to help pay for some minor
M E M O R A N D U M
FROM: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
TO: South Burlington Planning Commission
RE: Next Week's Agenda
DATE: July 30, 1982
5. Green Mountain Power Building
1. A substantial area of storm water runoff is being directed toward the
storm system on Green Mountain Drive which outlets into drainage ditches
along Shelburne Road. This added runoff may result in problems on Green
Mountain Drive and Shelburne Road.
2. The Storm water swale along the north side of the access drive must be
intercepted F,ii n uA ain mete; I�..�',.re 41i. .,.a.,.rs r.,.,.en ��,...ntai Drive-.
���..�.�..�,r�cu Uy, u uiu�nage inlCl. UCiVIC Il, e11l.CIJ UICCII I'IUUlil.dlfl U/ IVe.
6. Retail Complex, Dorset St.
1. The Dorset Street entrance will require major improvements including widening
and traffic signals.
2. Drainage of the site to the Dorset Street system, due to its small size pipe,
is a problem. The area may have to pond for an extended period of time during
a heavy storm.
°
PLANNER
863.2882
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
Attorney Robert Perry
Perry & Schmucker
1480 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Perry,
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-2486
July 28, 1982
The Green Mountain Power Co. project on Green Mountain Drive is a permitted
use in the Commercial 2 zone in which it is located. As such, it conforms with the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
However, I wish to note that the project has not yet received site plan
approval from the City Planning Commission. A hearing is scheduled for Tuesday,
August 3. I cannot predict what issues or questions may be raised at that time.
Sincerely,
David H. Spitz,
City Planner
6HPava Hq
IK
September 8, 1981
SOUth Burlington Zoning Board
City Ha
Dorset trect
South B rlington, Vermont 05401 .�
rittentio : J. Everett Reed, Chairman
D►'ar Mr. RXt2d:
!`hank you ft�attending the August 26 meeting at'Sou Burlington Middle School
concerning ti Allenbrook Croup Home. ss
For the record, those in attendance in/eKenn
hn Schillhammer and Dom Marabella,
)resenting th Allenbrook board; Tomnd Dale Wolfe, the Allenbrook
t� iching parents Mark Johnson, Tom MoTashman, and John Burchard of SRS;
Prit Davison, Pat risk, Hal Benson andzagalli, representing the Allen -
brook n�:i�hborhood, Dave Kaufman and Jdy, South Burlington legislators;
t,,:ator Esther Sorr 11 and Ron Crismanng the study committee on juvenile:.
ime.
rrTunart: =-ciefly, d cussion rev ved around the Allenbrook program and the typ,.
c,f c'hil(. °hit should par icipAte i it. It was agreed that Allenbrook should con -
to t xi st to serve t e needs of troubled youth. It was also agreed that Ally..
:= is not nor ever will e a ecure detention facility, nor will Allenbrook be
,fired to accept youths it do s not feel are appropriate for the program.
is Wa t-e concensus of the g o p that the following guidelines and/or objectives
;e eetablished for the Allen roo home:
1. At least one and referabl two neighborhood residents sit permanently on
the Allenbrook B and of Dire ors.
2. The Allenbrook oard will compil a list of names, addresses and phone
numbers of Al nbrook board member and others as appropriate who may be
contacted for purposes of answering uestions or'i,n emergency. The board
will. provide this list along with a le ter of explanation to neighbors
wit1iin the ediate area of Allenbrook.
3. A maximum f 14 youths in addition to staf ill reside at Allenbrook.
4. The 'Ile rook program will be monitored for a eriod of 10 months (through
June 30, 1982). During the last month of this p iod a questionnaire com-
piled b the boa-d will be distributed to neighbor . The results of this
quests Haire will be made available to the neighbo and will be used by
thu A enbrook board for purposes of program evaluati
S. At t e conclusion of the 10 month period and following co ilation of the
questionnaire., the Allenbrook board will meet with the neig bors to
determine whether the program has met dgsired criteria and to discuss the
program's future.
PLANNTNG COMMISSION JUNE 22, 19E2
3. This approval shall expire in 6 months.
Mr. tin ,h seconded the motion.
- r. 'Zwing had originally proposed a stipulation '4 as follows: "Screening
along t:e rear property line shall be provided, to screen the construction
equipment." Mr. Walsh, however, wondered if this should be required at this
time, before there is a problem. Mr. Ward noted that if someone bought the
new lot and wanted to screened, they could do it themselves. Mr. EwinC withdiew
the stipulation.
The motion passed with Yr. Mona voting no.
Requµ.t by Gerald Milot for an additional 1 year extension for the 34 unit
:'u a —I— e development on Kennedy Drive
Mr. ,Hard said the project was originally approved about 2 years ago,
on 7/2/8 0, and that approval expires 7/22/82. ',The applicant requested and
was granted an extension. lie requested 2 years and was granted 1. The
current: extension runs until July of 1983. Mr. Ward said there; had been a
question about sewer capacity. He said the unused capacity was 69,000 gallons
per day (gpd) and the estimated use for Sugartree is 8500 gpd. No large
developments have been approved since then.
Yr. Milot noted that he had built 184 units in Twin Oaks in a 2 112
year period, but that the economy had taken a downturn since then. After
that, he had built Cardinal 'goods (120 units) in 4 years. He cannot now
start construction on this project, in competition with himself, and he knows
he cannot start this development for 2 years unless the economy picks up, and
i.e does not see that happening. He added that if he were before the Commission:
with a new development they would give him 2 years.
Mr. Ewing did not object to the extension, but asked what would hnppen
if other developers asked for the same thing and construction started picking;
up. hr. Milot did not feel this would set a precedent, feeling that the
Commission could say no to the person whom they felt was posing a danger to
the city. Mr. Mona noted that continually requesting extensions could give
a developer a monopoly on sewage capacity in the city. Mr. Jacob felt the
situation could change in two years. Mr. Milot did not feel he was holding
a ;rear number of permits in the city.
'e'r. Ewing moved to extend the a ,,roval for the 6ufrnrtree development
for "i,l urits originally approved on 2 80 and extended until '1 22 8
until 'r!:'2 84. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. Mr. Ewing hoped a lot of
develo,-ers did not start doing this.
The motion carried with Mr. Mona abstaining.
Infor, rational presentation'' by Green Mountain �Iower Corporat
cor1ric-rate headquarters on Green Mountain Drive
No action was to be taken on this application, Yr. Ward said. It is
Just a cl.ance for GMP and the Commission to talk about the plan. The lot
ccrt:. Ell 13 acres and is the largest of the National Life subdivision lots on
Gray n '�'}antain Drive.
. 'erry, representing Green Mountain Power Co., said the land south
of this was owned by the city and the UVM Horticultural Farm is to the north.
The 1%r:'. slopes toward route 7. The proposed building is 3 stories tall,
measured from the north and east elevations, which also have mirror glass ;ronts.
The south and west sides are masonry. The site is heavily treed and they mope
to retain most of those trees.
3.
4niY -
The present service and customer contact would continue to be from t?..,e
Williston facility. This new building would house the operations presently
in Burlington. No new employees are planned, so they expect about 105-11C=
employees to work 8-5 in the building total. Some will always be gone becaul(.
Of illness and vacations. There will be some dispatchers and emergency crew::
who will work nights, so there will be someone in the building 24 hours per dar,.
Mr. Perry went over the traffic survey information given to the
Planner. This building will house the employees from Montpelier as welCilty as
Burlington. That operation will move to this site. They expect many
employees to carpool and Mr. Perry noted that 80-85% of them would travel
south on route 7 to work in the morning, against the heavy flow of traffic
on the road. About 1/2 the employees plan to eat on the site at least 3
times per week, at lunch time, so GMP sees its traffic impact being 7:30-
8:00 in the morning, and 5:00-5:30 at night, iThey expect visitor traffic
of an average of 34 cars per day and truck traffic of an average of two deliveries.
per day 5 days per week. Those trucks will bring office supplies, etc.
The service trucks will not be housed here.
Mr. Perry said they would have about 110 parking spaces. They will also
be requesting a building height of 421, or 3 14' stories floor to floor. Mr.
Ward said the Commission could waive the height restriction of 35' if other
dimen--ional requirements were increased.
Mr. Perry said the landscaping plans were not finished yet.
Mr. Mona said the parking requirement should be related to the square
footage of usable area in the building.
G".z, architect John Dore said the building would be three stories in the
front but only 2 in the rear. He said the roof level was equal to or below
the top of the trees behind it on the site. He noted that there was a bump
up in tape roof. This is for the lobby area, which can hold 200-250 people.
There will be a glass skylight in this area, which will stick up about ple
above the roof. 6-81
Mr. Mona told GMP that feelings in the city were strong about
the height restriction Of 35'. He asked if the waiver had ever been used, and
Mr. dt,rd felt one building had been approved with a waiver, but never built.
Mr. Walsh asked about communication equipment on top of the building, and Mr.
Dore said he did not think there would be any up there.
.� Mr. Tore said the large areas of the building were very large, and needed
9 6 ceilings so a tunnel effect would not be created. In order to have
equipment to show people how to save energy and in order to run services,
they need room between the floor and ceiling. It may be 13' floor to floor
instead of 141, he said, but they need that flexibility. He said they had
thought of spreading the building out more, but it is a large building, and
may become larger, so they wanted as small a footprint as possible.
1Y,r. Mona requested some drawings showing what this would look like when
finished. He also asked Mr. Krassner, of the Natural Resources Committee, to
check into any pedestrian trails planned for this area.
Yr. :•:wing asked that the words "future expansion" be removed from the plan.
Mr. Dore said GMP had asked the architects to show how the building might be
added to in the future. He was asked about the "shelter" and said it was a
gazebo for employees to eat lunch. The recreation area would be for softball
games, etc. Mr. Mona noted that the Commission would not approve the sign -
the Zoning Administrator does that. Mr. Ewing did not think the City Engineer/
Manager would like the road island and Mr. Mona said they would have to talk
to the Fire Chief about the plans. Mr. Dore said they would probably have a
sprintcler system in the building.
4.
PLANNINC COMMISSION
JUNE r%2. 1982
Mr. Walsh felt that even with minimal traffic on Shelburne Road, the left
tT,,:rn stracking lane at Green Mountain Drive was dangerous and he said that would
have to be looked at carefully.
Mr. Mona asked about drainage and was told water would flow towards the
existing brook.. There will also be a settling pond.
Mr. Krassner was concerned about the building height and the traffic.
Site plrrr application by Lawrence Bagdan for two additions to Overlake
D.ifstribiA_tors. Inc., at 30 Green Mountain Drive
Mr. 'voird said there would be an addition to the front, and they would
square off the back. The additions will be for additional warehouse space
and more office area. Mr. Gregory, representing Overlake, said there would
only be warehousing space, there will be no new employees added. Overlake
has tar:on on some new lines and will need more Poom for inventory. They ma3T
have more truck deliveries as a result of the new lines, or there may just tie
larger loads.
Yr. Ewing moved that the South Burlington :Planning Commission approve
the site plan application by Lawrence Bagdan for two additions to an existir;g_
wrtrchou as depicted on a plan entitled "rropoSed Additions, 0verlaKe
Distributors, Inc., 30 Green Mountain Drive," prepared by Paul E. Wa.3ganz,
dnte-d .,one 1982 subject to the ollowing ntipulat ons:
1. Thespite plan shall accurately depict the location of the drain_aire
Swale and new parking areas.
2. AnChang-es in the drainage pattern shall be submitted to and _ p,I�r er',
by the C . ty engineer prior to issuance of a buildinE ermit.
3. A landscaping bond to cover the cost of new plantings shall be
rovive;i. M
4. A revised site plan, containing required changes from stipulations
1 and 2 shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to
ie' uan E ul' -a builiing permit.
5. This approval expires in 6 months.
Lr. Jacob seconded the motion. Mr. Ward felt the plans submitted tonight
covered the points in stipulation #4.
The motion carried with all in favor.
Minute:; of June 8, 1982
The notes had been consulted, and it was decided to replace the word
"their" in the third paragraph on page 1 with "the eity's".
Mr. Jacob moved to approve the June 8, 1982 minutes as amended. Mr.
Walsh soconded the motion and all voted aye.
e uest by Budget Rent -a -Car for reconsideration
tipulations from 5 25 82 site plan aoDroval
Mr. "hard said the applicant had requested reconsideration of two of thtj
stipulations placed on him when the plan was approved. Regarding the car
sales, "+r. Ward noted that this location would serve 2 or 3 other Budget
TRAFFIC SURVEY
Response 67 - Burlington Plus 12 shift work - dispatchers and janitors
19 - Montpelier
86 - Total
Carpool 33% Burlington employees for it
79% of Montpelier for it
78 traveling south
7 traveling north
Arrival 26 Burlington employees arrive 7:30 - 7:50 am
29 Burlington employees arrive 7:50 - 8:00 am
.Departure 25 employees, maximum, working after 5
39 employees depart at 5, always
11 depart by 5:15 ) When they do work late, which may be
19 depart by 5:30 only once a week.
14 depart after 5:30 )
Lunch 54 expect to eat at office three or more days a week
63 expect to leave during lunch hour two*or more times a week
Work- Related
Departures 14 employees leave the site one or more times a day
25 employe'es leave at least once a week
NOTE: If a carpool is formed, the lack of lunchtime mobility may change lunch
hour departures. The more employees are involved in carpools, the less
will arrive early or stay late.
MES/lb
5/27/82
EMPLOYEE TRAFFIC SURVEY
Traffic plans for the new Corporate Headquarters must be
prepared to meet zoning information needs. Please fill out the
form below and return to Walter Oakes by Thursday, May 27.
Thank you for your help.
1) What are your work hours?
lunch hour?
2) How many minutes before your start time do you normally
arrive at GMP's facility? minutes
3) How many days during the week do you normally work beyond
your established and finished time? days
4) If you consistently work beyond your established finish time,
do you work less than 15 minutes between
15 and 30 minutes 30 minutes or more? (Check one)
5) How often do you expect to eat lunch at GMP's facility
once or twice a month once or twice a
week three or more times a week?
6) Keeping in mind that the new Corporate Headquarters will be
located on Shelburne Road across from Shearer Chevrolet, how
many times during a work week would you anticipate leaving the
site during lunch hour 0 -1 times 2 or 3
times 4 or 5 times?
t
Page -2-
7) What form of transportation will you normally use to get to
work after the move your car pool vehicle
taxi bus walk other?
Note: If you plan to walk, will you be doing so during the
spring summer fall
winter months? (Check those applicable)
8) If car pooling is available would you use it yes
no?
9) When coming to work in the morning, would you normally annrnarh
our new Corporate Headquarters' site by traveling
south on Shelburne Road and making a left turn onto Green Mountain
Drive or by traveling north on Shelburne Road and making
a right turn onto Green Mountain Drive?
10) How many times during a. work week do you leave your office building?
(Exclusive of trips n-iade during lunch time and trips made at the
beginning and at the end of your work day)
.2A
apt, 14..
EN MOURTAIN POWER COR RATHEAT
NORTH ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
lk
ILL
SOUTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
ELEVATIONS'
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: David if. Spitz, City Planner
Re: Next week's agenda items
Date: 6/18/82
2) Couillard
I'-'inal survey data for this 1-lot subdivision has been provided. A septic
system must still be designed to State and City health requirements oefore a
building permit may be issued, but this is not a prerequisite for final plat
approval.
There is a noticeable construction business on Mr. Couillard's property,
but there is a reasonable separation between the location of that business and
the pror-x)sed new lot. If the Commission wishes, there can be a stipulation
that iio new outside storage will be permitted within 65 feet (or some specifiuc.
distw,r;cr) from any portion of the newly -created lot.
'Phis 34-unit project was originally approved on 7/2/80 with an expiratij
date oL 7/22/82. Two Months ago the applicant requested a two year extension,
fx>�r ✓tr, the Planning Commission was only willing to grant one year. he
appl.i(-,1nt again is requesting the extension for the second year, and _,is rea&-,,
are given in the attached
letter.
QEf, n Mountain Power
As described in the last memo, this will be an informat ,r. r, v w 710
acti m is required) of Green Mountain Power's proposed new cc::,r_porat:=
on r' c',en Mountain Drive.
I'd eliminary traffic data was sent out with the last
play , ,.1 at Tuesday's meeting.
application for twoadditions (40x60 and 40x40) to a
alrcae, received ZoningBoard
approval for a dimensional rarina,, -
stwte�; '-fiat no new emplc;y(-.es or traffic will result from the adc?i
housc, space.
The site already is well landscaped, and some new tilantings w_il 1,-e addczd,
lvl-v only concern is at the southwest portion of the property wh-,r.• t_,
3kir';lr rx lot. apparently is being expanded the landscaping plj ,, �3� ;Ows ';,i..,. �•,
n0t_ Hit s_;ito plan) . At a previous approval it wa I.pulated tha . a LY-1 ,49c
swalc in this area should be adequately maintainec.i. The location of the
and any changes in drainage should be accurately identified.
6) Luc'.<1et Rent -a -Car
This applicant received site plan approval last month, however, he is
Memorandum
Next week's agenda items
June 4, 1982
Page 2
STWE:R: The same comment applies here as for water.
S`IK)RM DRAINAGE: I have requested some additional input on downstream drainage
impact:;.
Lot 17 should be divided among the 2 adjacent lots with easements grantee. to
the City.
No special drainage provisions have been made to protect the upper row o
lots. I agree with this approach, however, a stipulation must be made to assure that
future lot owners are advised to install proper drainage to protect themselves.
PEDESTRIAN TRAILS: Wording should be added to allow location of the 15 foot zIL
easements anywhere within the 50 foot conservation strip.
FIRE 1.11,111TIITION: I have not yet received a final ok from Chief Goddrtte.
LANDSCIIT'ING: Cost estimates must still be submitted. Also, I have asked for
some nix- ifications near the stormwater filters.
Street trees must be added.
DEVEh(7PMFNT SCHEDULE: Due to the very large scale of the project, approvals should
be valid for several years. Appropriate restrictions will be needed concerning
the availability of the Ireland connections and concerning timing of roadway
construction.
5) P}()to Kiosk
A site plan, letter, and traffic count are enclosed for this proposed 4' by
8' photo kiosk in the Merrill Theatre Complex on Williston Road. Two issues
must he addressed: (1) The enclosed traffic data indicates a maximum of 13 tran-
so ctionr> (26 trips) and an average of 9 transactions (18 trips) between 3 and 4
P-m. The CI-C2 ordinance does not permit any increase in traffic at this location
urYlrss special Planning Conmlission approval is granted under section 7.50. (2)
The proposed location of the kiosk allows stacking for only 1 car. During a
recent - hour observation of the kiosk at an Essex Junction shopping center,
there was one time period in which 3 cars were waiting. While this will not occur
frequently, it can happen often enough to create potential circulation problems.
6) Green Mountain Power
The applicant is planning to relocate the company's headquarters from down-
town Burlington to this site on Green Mountain Drive overlooking Lake Champlain.
The only required review for this application is a site plan; however, both
the applicant and I feel it would be helpful to schedule an informational session
similar to a sketch plan.
Enclosed is an employee survey which gives a preliminary indication of the
amount of traffic that the new building is likely to generate.
1795 WILLISTON ROAD
SOUTH BURLINGTON,
VERMONT 05401
(802) 863-1428
SARGENT
WEBSTER
CRENSHAW
1_6 July 1982 NSr FOLLEY
ARCHITECTS ■ ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS
PARTNERS
EDWIN B. BRUCE, AIA
Environmental Conservation Agency
ARTHUR C. FRIEDEL, JR.. AIA
HERBERTBOERNER.AIA
111 West Street
ARTHUR V. SERRANO, JR., PE
Junction, Vermont 05452
MICHAEEssex
ROBERTLJKELLY, LEE, AIA
ROBERT L. KELLY, AIA
ARNOLD A. BITTERMAN. PE
Attn: Ms. Katherine Powers
WILLIAM E. MARKLEY, AIA
KENNETH R. BECKER, RLA
District Coordinator
ASSOCIATES
Re:
JOHN H. DEIERLEIN, AIA
ROGER
Green Mountain Power Corporate Headquarters
E.
OHNLSALNSKY,IPE
SWC&F Project No. 82- 30 7
SALVATORE A. CATALANO, AIA
GEORGE H. HAYES, AIA. PE
Dear Ms. Powers:
RICHARD T. LAFFERTY, AIA
JORGE VILLALI, PE
WARREN R. FERGUSON, RLA
As of this date we have transmitted a check for $3500.00
RICHARD A. HAUPT, PE
CALIXTO 1. SUAREZ, PE
seven (7) sets of drawings consisting of Floor Plans,
Elevation
L.DHAROGLASSTONER.
L. DOUGLAS STONER
and Site Plans, seven (7) sets of drawings
EUGENEL.TUCKER,AIA
and written backup of Erosion Control Plan Construction
R UCEW.CJOHN RLE,C
BRUCE W. COLE, CSI
Phase and Preliminary Site Plan.
CONSULTANTS
The partial application addressing criteria which
D. KENNETH SARGENT, FAIA
011
have required us to address is in process and willybe
THOMAFREDERICKS.WEBSTER.FAIA
MILOD. T.CEY,AIA W,AIA
MILO D. FOLLEY, AIA
submitted to your office shortly in total.
DARREL D. RIPPETEAU, FAIA
ROBERT W. MALMROS, AIA
We are assuming that you will be sending out the public
NRACYORK
notice as of this date as confirmed in our telephone
USE
W ATERTsE
ATERTOWN
conversation of 15 July 1982, which will start the short
BUFFALO
time fuse on this project.
VERMONT
BURLINGTON
If you have any questions, or if we can be of assistance
MAINE
in any way, please call.
BANGOR
Very truly yours,
SARGENT-WEBSTER-CRENSHAW & FOLLEY
Arch'tects Engineers Planners
R.J hn Dor. , AIA
Pr sect Manager
/dk
cc: Walter Oakes
Bob Perry
Doug MacArthur
David Spitz ✓
ELT
File
ACT 250 NOTICE
AMENDMENT APPLICATION AND HEARING
10 VSA, §6083-6088
Amendment Application #4C0094-2 was filed by Green Mountain Power Real
Estate Corporation of 1 Main Street, Burlington, Vermont on July 16, 1982 for
a project generally described as the construction of a 51,210 square foot, three -
storied building with related roadways, parking and municipal water and sewer on
Lot #17 of a previously approved 18 lot subdivision off Green Mountain Drive in
South Burlington, Vermont.
This project will be evaluated in accordance with the 10 environmental cri-
teria of 10 VSA, §6086(a). Statutory parties to this application are the munici-
pality, the municipal planning commission, the Chittenden County Regional Plan-
ning Ccmission, and affected State agencies. Adjoining property tuners may par-
ticipate to the extent the proposal will have a direct effect on their property
under the 10 criteria. Other persons may participate at the discretion of the
District Commission. If you wish to participate, please contact the Coordinator
for further information before the first hearing or date as specified below.
A public hearing is scheduled for 1:00 p.m., Friday, July 30, 1982 at the
Chittenden County Regional Planning Ca7raission office, 58 Pearl Street, Essex
Junction, Vermont.
BY
Katherine M. Powers, District Coordinator
111 West Street, Essex Junction, Vt. 05452
879-6563 7/16/82
State of Vermont
Department of Fish and Game
Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation
Department of Water Resources
Division of Environmental Engineering
Division of Environmental Protection
Natural Resources Conservation Council
Walter S. Oakes
Director, Corporate Services
Green Mountain Power Corp.
1 Main Street
Burlington, VT 05401
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
DIVISION OF PROTECTION
August 6, 1982
ill West Street
Essex Jct., VT 05452
879-6563
Re: Application #4C0084-2, new corporate headquarters building, 52,210 sq. ft.
Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington
Dear Mr. Oakes:
Per the request from your architect, authorization to commence with site and
foundation work is granted with the following conditions:
(1) No work is permitted beyond the foundation including the installation of
waste or water distribution plumbing through the foundation or below grade
within the building until the interior plumbing plans have been approved
by the Division of Protection.
(2) This office understands from discussions with your architect that the exterior
sewer and water services connecting to the South Burlington municipal systems
are under design by a registered professional engineer. Please forward
these plans to this office for review as soon as they are completed.
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Cl
j:es F. Aga PE
Assistant Regional Engineer
cc: P. Howard Flanders, PE
Ernest P. Christianson
Mike Zahner
City of So. Burlington
R. John Dore, AIA
E.
No Text
ROUTE 7
VISI15ILITY IeANCGE OF
15UILDIN(4 THRCU�N
(' (NTHEWH VIEW AREA
40 ' TH rOU�H zV
612EEN IJOUNTAIrI PKWE
VI'I U T Y - 2V
CEN T I2AL VIEL,I
EXISTING V
KOUTE 7
NOTE: WHEN SGI2EEN I�LANTIN�� MbIbILI 1 Y - M
TAKE EFFECT, TOE VIEWS FROM E)ou TNE VIEW
THE CENTRAL �, "WTHERN VIEW
i
AK -A) WILL 5F- P-UPIIHATEP
i
i
i
P-XISTIN(j
RO TE
i
rKor05En
1 L-r-,) i I 1 i I" -
C,E[E-N MOUNTAIN FOWEK
COrrG,K�,A.TE I4EArQUAf2TE12S
EXI6TIMC DIMES
VISUAL ACCESS STUPY-Vll�Arl-ASICTIOIIS
HOOZCHTAL I" loi" \/P-rTICAL I = Zo VErMLAL EXA(?GErATICN 5X
�r-12u I 6VEM NDuHTAV rO�Jlr COFFOCATE kEAPOUW I Erl�
&ARGENT SHEET
j VVEBSTER
CRENSHAW
& POLLEY ARCHITECT'S ENGINEERS PLANNERS
O
3YRACU9R MA7ER"IO" SCl4ElYDCTAD'Y BUFFALO BURUNCTON BA1rG(1R
R E V 1 S 1 0 N DRAWN Yl1 / I CHECKED DATE 9�7 ���p� SCALE t�I�Zr t'7 i PROD ECTQ / qn� C OF
f
rb
STATE OF VERMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # 4
August 13, 1982
GMP Real Estate Corporation
c/o Douglas Hyde
One Main Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Land Use Permit application #4C0094-2
Dear Mr. Hyde:
The District #4 Environmental Commission hereby authorizes
commencement of site preparation and foundation construction for
the new corporate office building to be located on Lot #17 of
the previously approved 18 lot subdivision off Green Mountain
Drive in SoutH,Burlington, Vermont. The Commission has received
adequate information to make positive findings under all the
criteria of Act 250 with the exception of 1(B) Waste Disposal,
5 Traffic Congestion and 9(F) Energy Conservation. These areas
are currently being reviewed by the affected State agencies and
we are awaiting their input.
.Jim Agan, Assistant Regional Engineer for the Protection Div-
ision has issued a site and foundation work approval letter dated
August 6, 1982. Based upon this approval, the Commission authorizes
clearing, grubbing, construction of temporary access road, excava-
tion of site, pile driving and preliminary foundation work. Our
approval excludes the installation of exterior water and sewer un-
til the engineering plans have been successfully reviewed by the
Assistant Regional Engineer in Essex Junction. All site and foun-
dation work must conform to all approved exhibits on file with the
District Commission specifically in relation to erosion control
measures.
GMP Real Estate Corporation
Page 2
A Land Use Permit with complete Findings of Fact shall be forth-
comming within a two week period pending review of the above
mentioned criteria by the State of Vermont.
Sincerely,
Michael Zahner
Acting District Coordinator
for District #4
MZ/bk
cc: Lincoln Brownell
Helen Lawrence
Jim Agan, P. E.
All Parties
SARGENT
WEBSTER
CRENSHAW
& FOLLEY
ARCHITECTS' ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS
10 January 1983
Date:
To: Mr. David Spitz
City PlaLllleL
South Burlington Planning Office
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05401
Re: Green Mountain Power Corporate Headquarters
SWC&F Project No.82-30/
Gentlemen: We are sending you: Herewith 11
Tracings ❑ Prints E�
Under Separate Cover ❑
Specifications K]
Shop Drawings ❑
-- _ -- ❑
No. of
Copies
Sheet No.
Tide
Latest
Date
Remarks
1
set
Site work grading & landscaping
1
Adden, #1 section 02700,
Spec. 02200, 02600, 02 25, 02700,
.02821, 02823, 03100, 032002 03300
6 Jan
83
15251, 15390
Remarks:
For your information and records.
RJD/dk
Sent by: If enclosures received are not as listed above, kindly notify at once.
❑ Messenger
Very truly yours,
❑ Express
❑ First Class Mail Sargent -Webster - Crenshaw & Folley
El Parcel Post Office 1795 Williston Road, So. Burlington, VT 05401
[2$]nited Parcel
❑ By
R. John Dore, AIA, Project Manager
M
GETT
CRENSA
HW
& FOLLEY
ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS ■ PLANNERS
Date:
12 July 1982
To: Mr. David Spitz
i y anner
South Burlington Planning Office
orset treet --
South Burlington, VT 05401
Re: Green Mountain Power Corporate Headquarters
Projct N
SWC&F eo. 82-307
Gentlemen: We are sending you: Herewith fLl Under Separate Cover ❑
Tracings ❑ Prints ❑ Specifications ❑
Shop Drawings El
_n
No. of
Cop ics
Sheer No.
—
"Title
-
Latest
Date
Remarks
5
Visual Access Study
Remarks:
For your review and comments. This Friday, July 16th, I will send
you a cross section through the building to show relationships of
new and existing grades immediately adjacent to the building.
cc: Mr. Walter Oakes with 1 copy of drawing
Mr. Bob Perry with 1 copy of drawing
RJD/dk
Sent by:
Xj Messenger DK If enclosures received are not as listed above, kindly notify at once.
❑ Express Very truly yours,
❑ First Class Mail Sargent -Webster -Crenshaw & Folley
❑ Parcel Post 1795 Williston Road, So. Burlington, VT 05401
❑ United Parcel Office
R. Johi Dore, AIA, Project Manager
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PLANNER
863-2882
July 29, 1982
District Environmental Commission # 4
111 West Street
Essex Junction, VT. 05452
ATTENTION: Michael Zahner
Dear Commissioners:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-2486
I will be unable to attend the hearing on the Green Mountain Power application
on Friday, July 30. However, I do wish to ask that consideration be given to one
issue under criteria 5, "Use of highways".
There is currently a considerable volume of traffic on Shelburne Road at the inter-
section with Green Mountain Drive, the only access to the project. A recently
submitted traffic impact report indicates that level of service at that intersection
will shortly be below the normally accepted standard (level C) unless certain changes
are made.
Green Mountain Power's contribution to the total traffic volume will be relatively
small, but this intersection does provide sole access for the GMP building. The
location is under State jurisdiction, and the City's request is that the Agency of
Transportation examine potential improvements for the intersection.
Our intention is not to delay the start of construction of the GMP building, but
to begin the process of determining any needed improvements and to determine GMP's
responsibility, if any, towards contributing to those improvements.
Sincerely, ,
David H. Spitz
City Planner
/df
SARGENT
WEBSTER
ILMJI& CRENSHAW
FOLLEY
ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS
16 July 1982
Date:
To: Mr. David Spitz
City Planner
South Burlington Planning Office
Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05401
Re: Green Mountain Power Corporate Headquarters
SWC&F Project No. 82-307
Gentlemen: We are sending you: Herewith
Tracings ❑ Prints ❑
Under Separate Cover ❑
Specifications ❑
El
Shop Drawings ❑
No. of
Copies
Sheet No.
Tide
Latest
Date
Remarks
1
set
Soil. Erosion Control Plan &
1
Preliminary Site Plait
Description
Remarks:
For your review. If you have any questions, please call this office.
RJD/dk
Sent by: If enclosures received are not as listed above, kindly notify at once.
❑ Messenger
❑ Express Very truly yours,
❑ First Class Mail Sargent -Webster -Crenshaw & Folley
❑Parcel Post Office 1795 Williston_ Road, So. Burlington, VT 05401
❑ United Parcel
❑ By Ac.v K_
R. J n Dore, AIA, Project Manager
UIRU�EN MOUNTAIN 1-'()-NVEB (',OR-PO.SATION
ONE... MAIN STREE-r, P. O. Box B50
BURLINGTON, VEFRMONT 05402
802 /8G4 - 5 721
July 28, 1982
District Environmental Commission No. 4
111 West Street
Essex Junction, VT 05452
Re: Green MOuntain Power Corporate Headquarters
Dear COm-nission Members:
It is our intention to furnish and install a lighted sign in
the location as shown on the architect's site plan dated July 13, 1982.
At this time, the sign nor its content have been determined. We
would be pleased to review the sign when we have determined its design
and at that time, review and obtain the District Commission's approval
prior to constructing and installing; it.
very truly yours,
—4a"RekOakes
Director Corporate Services
WSO:ff
cc: Mike 6 ahner
David Spitz
John Dore
SARGENT
WEBSTER
CRENSHAW
& FOLLEY
ARCHITECTS' ENGINEERS • PLANNERS
28 July 1982
Date:
To: Mr. David Spitz
City Planner
South Burlington Planning Office
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05401
Re: Green Mountain Power Corporate Headquarters
SWC&F Project No. 82-307
Gentlemen: We are sending you: Herewith a Under Separate Cover ❑
Tracings ❑ Prints ® Specifications ❑
Shop Drawings ❑
No. of
Copies
Sheet No.
Title
Latest
Date
Remarks
4
Latest Preliminary Site Plan
Remarks:
RJD/dk
Sent by:
® Messenger dk
❑ Express
❑ First Class Mail
❑ Parcel Post
❑ United Parcel
For your review.
if enclosures received are not as listed above, kindly notify at once.
Very truly yours,
Sargent -Webster -Crenshaw & Folley
1795 Williston Road, So. Burlington, VT 05401
R. Jopa Dore, AIA, Project Manager
SARGENT
MWEBSTER
CRENSHAW
FOLLEY
ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS
Date: 26 July 1982
To: Mr. David Spitz
City Planner — - ---
South Burlington Planning Office
Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05401
Re: Green Mountain Power Corporate Headquarters
SWC&F Project No. 82-307
Gentlemen: We are sending you: Herewith ® Under Separate Cover ❑
Tracings ❑ Prints ❑ Specifications ❑
El
Shop Drawings ❑
No. of
Copies
Sheer No.
Title
Latest
Date
Remarks
4
Visual Access Study - View Area
Sections
Remarks:
For your review and information.
cc: Walter Oakes
Bob Perry
RJD/dk
Sent by: If enclosures received are not as listed above, kindly notify at once
❑ Messenger
❑ Express Very truly yours,
)First class Mail Sargent -Webster -Crenshaw & Folley
❑Parcel Post 1795 Williston Road, So. Burlington, VT 05401
--- --
❑ United Parcel Office
❑ By
R. Joh Dore, AIA, Prod t manager
VERMONT'S NINTH AND
FASTEST GROWING CITY
City of South Burlington
1181 WILLISTON ROAD
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
TEL. 863-2891
NATIONAL LIFE
SUMMARY OF SALES
OFFICE OF
CITY MANAGER
11/23/71
PURCHASED 161.5 A in 1952 - BOTH SIDES OF SHELBURNE ROAD
PURCHASE PRICE $155,000
NATIONAL LIFE HAS SINCE
SOLD TO:
Pomerleau
8 A +
-
$130,000
AlWarren
600'
X
600'
150,000
Fairview Motors
200'
X
500'
70,000
Green Mt. Power
400'
X
600'
115,000
University of Vt.
19 A
+
-
19,500
Shearer Chevrolet
750'
X
708'
110,000
Goss Dodge
11 A
+
-
141,000
TOTAL OF ABOVE SALES ----------------------- $735,500
102 ACRES - BALANCE OF PROPERTY
xd�xxuu.aroy r
City of South Burlington
1181 WILLISTON ROAD
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
TEL. 863-2891
VERMONT'S NINTH AND
FASTEST GROWING CITY
NATIONAL LIFE TAX PAYMENTS
1953 to 1971
1953 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - $ 868.10
1954 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 1,166.92
1955 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 1,172.31
1956 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 1,276.38
1957 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 1,334.20
1958 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 1,573.26
1959 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 1,734.20
1960 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 3,128.80
1961 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 3,613.50
1962 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 4,804.48
1963 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 2,349.60
1964 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 9,954.30
1965 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 6,243.30
1966 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 5,165.99
1967 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 4,895.45
1968 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 4,996.25
1969 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 6,951.33
1970 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 7,486.68
1971 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 20,903.96
Total
89,619.01
OFFICE OF
CITY MANAGER
11/23/71
,r
79__-
-
f--
_1
0-7
-� 2,F
) 1 f
127
2 t 1 g 7
llettS t
olc esters
y
2 4 2 2A 128
4
\
�O�r aerr \,y 127
tssext
t100$�(1 e er
t `2 15
act one
Burlington
�r �3, 0J
ngton ,
(See Inset)
t 1 by Cor. 11;
3
2 I
efts Cor. illist0 1
3 r-.ry,
2 3 3 1 r,
4 2 6
3 1 2
z
3 2A
J" 1
Shelbtu 2 343
t
5 CorneRichmol
3 5 2 2
t.
SMlemt t
f 1
t a ,3 Georg
RhIslode
> _ 4 helb me
Fells
4.= 1 Corners
� f 3
4
` ech'anicsville
Hines y
24
Charlotte r
East 3
t t
t Charlotte
Prindl'� t south '
Ninesbur
'Corners� � 95 a.
a ¢ p ='
°'4 PROPERTY DATA
The property is owned by the NATIONAL
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Montpelier,
Vermont.
It is located in the City of South Burlington,
between Shelburne Road on the west and
Spear Street on the east, 1.0 mile south of
the interchange of 1-189 and U.S. Rte. 7. It is
also only 3.1 miles from downtown Burling-
ton, the largest city in Vermont.
The abutting properties are commercial on the
west along U.S. 7; the University of Vermont
Horticultural Experiment Station to the north;
all the other abutting properties are either
single family residential or are in agricul-
tural use.
COMMUNITY DATA
The City of South Burlington is readily ac-
cessible from major points in the north-
eastern U.S. by fine highway connections
and is well served by air by Mohawk, North-
east, Air North, and Executive Airlines.
Driving times and distances are approximately
as follows:
11/2 hours to Montreal,100 miles
21/2 hours to Albany,150 miles
4 hours to Boston, 225 miles
5'/2 hours to New York City, 300 miles
The City population in 1970 was 10,032 up from
6,866 in 1960 and 3,279 in 1950. The trade
area (Chittenden County) totaled 99,131 in
1970, 74,425 in 1960 and 62,570 in 1950. The
high income labor force is estimated at about
44,000, well distributed in manufacturing and
commerce, as well as in education, health
and other fast growing service industries.
The City offers fine community facilities and
services and has long established plan-
ning and zoning boards to ensure quality
development.
Offered Exclusively By
HICKOK & BOARDMAN, INC.
346 Shelburne Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401 .... phone 802/658-3500
HICKOK
BURLINGTON offered exclusively by
BOARDMAN,
Burlington, Vermont
To be sold in parcels suitable for a variety of uses including but not limited to prime com-
merciar frontage and off highway commercial; multi -family moderate cost housing; high
cost single and multi -family development.
Sk"
NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
��npvtieai�tke "'' A � 1
City o� Soat6, �Bwh�fta�, owafit � `"_ J
Approximate Scale 1" = 500"
—�-- N
1
H
c. 850' Frontage
Burlin9'ton�r
X,
OF VERMONT
NORDIC
FORD��
ShE�B N
RNE ROAD
MOUNTAIN
`POWER
\ . CORP. \
She/ u ne
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND PRICING
A choice offering for commercial and residential purposes ... available in separate parcels
or in total. . . The entire property is situated east of Shelburne Road (US 7) at an approxi-
mate elevation of 160 feet . . . rises gently to an elevation of 360 feet on Spear Street in a
distance of about 4500 feet... .
FCOMMERCIAL
SECTIONS A, B, & C Prime commercial
frontage on Shelburne Road (US 7) . . .
truly the "most wanted" location in the
Greater Burlington area ... frontage to be
sold in suitable parcels at $350 per front
foot (with a depth of 600 feet) . . . water
and sewer to site make for minimum de-
velopment costs....
Sections D & E Excellent off main high-
way locations . . . unusual terrain and
plantings provide wonderful sites for of-
fice, distribution center, etc. . . . possible
multifamily residential site . . . $8,500 per
acre....
OTHER
Existing road (on 70' ROW) from Shel-
burne Road to University of Vermont
Horticultural Experiment Station....
Reserved for future roadway (on 60'
ROW) to provide access to Section F
RESIDENTIAL
Sections D & E Superb off main highway
locations ... terrain and plantings provide
marvelous sites for multifamily residential
or selected commercial uses ... $8,500 acre
Section F Likely site for medium to high
density moderate cost residential devel-
opment ... marvelous views .. . easy ter-
rain, mostly open with outstanding mature
trees . . . might also be suitable for se-
lected commercial uses $8,000 per
acre....
Section G Suitable for medium to high
cost single family development . . . pos-
sible condominium or multi -family use
... gentle slope, some meadow, some well
treed ... $3,000 per acre....
Section H Prestige residential neigh-
borhood with 300' frontage on Spear
Street . . . $3,500 per acre . . . sold only
with (or after) Section G . . . gentle slope,
excellent tree cover . . . fabulous setting
offering is subject to errors, omissions,. prior sale, change or withdrawal without notice.
Offered Exclusively By
HICKOK & BOARDMAN,
INC.