Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0514 Farrell Street3Ys' FAkt?ELz- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD \drb\sub\f&m\finaleastwoodll amend.doc DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: August 5, 2005 Plans received: July 13, 2005 FINAL PLAT PLAN REVIEW #SD-05-60 F&M DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — O'DELL PARKWAYPUD Agenda # 15 Meeting Date: August 16, 2005 Applicant Owners F&M Development Corporation F&M Development Corp., LLC; LP.O. Box 421 Lake Champlain Housing Development Corp.; Burlin ton, VT 05402 Farrell Com. Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\f&m\finaleastwood amend.doc PROJECT dESCRIPTION The F&M Development Corporation, herein referred to as the applicant, is requesting final plat approval to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of: 1)309 residential units in six (6) buildings, 2) subdividing two (2) parcels of 24.458 acres into eight lots, 3) a 90,000 sq. ft. building which will include 11,000 sq. ft. of retail, a 15-seat, 7,500 sq. ft. restaurant, 70,000 sq. ft of general office, 2,500 sq. ft. drive-in bank, and ten (10) residential units, 4) a 4, 430 sq. ft, expansion to an indoor recreation facility, and 5) an e existing 16,000 sq. ft. television studio and office building. The amendment consists of: 1) subdividing lot #1 into three (3) lots, 2) boundary line adjustment between lots #8 & 9, 3) reduce size of mixed -use building to 64,350 sq. ft. to include 40,000 sq. ft of office use, 7,000 sq. ft. of retail use and six (6) dwelling units, 4) site modifications to 370 Farrell St, 5) increasing the expansion of indoor recreational facility by 210 sq. ft to 4,460 sq. ft., and 6)constructing a 71-unit 4-story multi -family dwelling on lot #9, Farrell Street. COMMENTS Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on July 13, 2005 and have the following comments: Setbacks: The proposed 71-unit residential building meets the applicable front, rear, and side setback requirements for the subject PUD, as outlined in Table C-2 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Density: The maximum density allowed in the subject PUD is 457 units (includes affordability bonus which has been met). The proposed project will increase the number of units built from 309 units to a total of 386 units. Coverage: The staff finds that there is not enough information to assess the correct coverages associated with this proposal. At this point, the applicant has noted that it is including the Ben Franklin lot as part of the total lot size. However, the applicant is not including the Ben Franklin lot for purposes of lot and building coverages, or for the calculation of traffic generation or parking spaces needed. It is staff's understanding that the Ben Franklin lot is not under ownership by the applicant, and is not included in the application. If this is the case, then several amendments will need to be made, both to the site plans and to the staff comments. As the applicant was on vacation and unavailable to staff prior to the hearing, staff respectfully requests more time in order to discuss this issue with the applicant, and work out issues contingent on the clarification of this matter. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\f&m\finaleastwood amend.doc PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13(B)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public utility system shall be extended to provide the necessary quantity of water; at an acceptable pressure, to the proposed dwelling units. The Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department, Jay Nadeau, reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated July 19, 2005 (attached). 1. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Water Department, as outlined in the letter from Jay Nadeau dated July 19, 2005. The City of Burlington's Water and Wastewater Treatment, Distribution, and Collection Facilities will handle the wastewater disposal of this project. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 2. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access is provided to the proposed building on lot 9 by Farrell Street, a proposed public roadway connecting Shelburne Road and Swift Street. The proposed 24' drive and 67 space parking lot is off Farrell Street, to the west of the access for Eastwood Commons and to the east of the TV Studio. This access will connect to the parking lots for the buildings on lot 1, and will connect to a proposed pedestrian walkway to the Twin Oaks facility. According to the ITE, 7th Edition, the amendment is estimated to b ring the Planned Unit Development's total P.M. vehicle trip ends to 253 P.M. peak -hour vehicle trip ends. The applicant will pay any applicable traffic impact fees for the additional vehicle trip ends the proposed amendment is estimated to create. 3. The applicant shall pay any applicable traffic impact fees for the additional vehicle trip ends the proposed amendment is estimated to create, prior to issuance of the zoning permit for the 71-unit residential building. Staff does not feel the proposed amendment will create any new circulation issues CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\f&m\finaleastwood amend.doc 4. If and when the applicant updates the traffic study for the subject PUD, the 79-unit residential building shall be incorporated into that study and any relevant traffic management strategies shall be implemented. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property does not contain any wetlands, streams, or unique natural features. Some part of the southern part of the property does lie in the Flood Plain Overlay District; however, no new structures or alterations are proposed within this overlay. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the Commercial 1 District is hereby formed in order to encourage the location of general retail and office uses in a manner that serves as or enhances a compact central business area. Other uses that would benefit from nearby access to a central business area, including clustered residential development and small industrial employers, may be permitted if they do not interfere with accessibility and continuity of the commercial district. Large -lot retail uses, warehouses, major industrial employers, and incompatible industrial uses shall not be permitted. Planned Unit Developments are encouraged in order to coordinate traffic movements, promote mixed -use developments, provide shared parking opportunities, and to provide a potential location for high - traffic generating commercial uses. Staff feels that the proposed development conforms to the purpose of the C1 District and that it is visually compatible with the area, which currently contains commercial uses and multi -family dwellings. The proposed uses will not interfere with the accessibility and continuity of the C1 District. Also, the proposed development is part of a PUD, which is encouraged in the C1 District. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels andlor stream buffer areas. The major open space area on this PUD is the land adjacent to the Interstate which comprises the IHO District. Staff feels this is an important open space area, as it provides a viable corridor along the Interstate and provides an aesthetic buffer between the Interstate and the PUD. Staff also notes that the open space on this PUD will not vary from the previously approved plans. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The South Burlington Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated August 11, 2005. He has noted that, because of the numerous other utilities on the site, he has had a very difficult time locating the fire hydrants on the plans. He has requested that the DRB continue the application so that the applicant can provide a clean copy of water lines and fire hydrants for his review. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\f&m\finaieastwood amend.doc 5. The applicant shall comply with the Fire Chiefs requests, as outlined in his letter dated August 11, 2005. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. A proposed public road serves all lots in the PUD. A sidewalk exists on the northerly side of the roadway and a 10' wide bike path exists on the southerly side of the roadway. The proposed recreation path has been moved and now flows from Farrell Street north along the easterly side of the Eastwood Commons Il parking lot, along the westerly boundary of the Twin Oaks facility, and eventually connecting with Hadley Road. The recreation path committee should review this proposed location. 6. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee shall review the plans for the proposed recreation path and provide comments. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. 7. Pursuant to Section 15.18(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines shall be underground. The applicant shall submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed street lights and pedestrian lights on the property. Both of the proposed lighting fixtures shall comply with Appendix A of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. At this time, the applicant is not proposing building -mounted lights for the building. 8. The applicant shall submit exterior lighting details (cut sheets) for any new street lights and pedestrian lights on the property. 9. If exterior lighting is to be installed on the 71-unit residential building or the indoor recreation facility additions, the details of the lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of the first zoning permit. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans for the proposed project and provided comments in a memo dated July 21, 2005. 10. The applicant shall address the comments of the City Engineer as noted in his memo of July 21, 2005. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff finds the proposed PUD to be consistent with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons: a. The plan is consistent with the stated purpose of the C1 District, as outlined in Section 5.01 of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\f&m\finaleastwood amend.doc the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. b. The proposed PUD will produce high density, mixed -use development, which is the fits the character and the goals for the area. c. The proposed PUD will produce infill development, which is promoted through the Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlinqton Land Development Regulations, anv PUD_ shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff feels the proposed project accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. Staff also feels the site provides for adequate planting and safe pedestrian movement. Based on the Land Development Regulations, this proposal will require more than 110 i parking spaces (the number of required spaces for the Twin Oaks is not included in this number because the capacity of the facility could not be determined by staff at this time). The applicant has provided and/or is proposing to provide 824 parking spaces (per F&M Development memo dated July 13, 2005). This shortfall is at least 277 spaces, or 25.2%. As this waiver, does not match the waiver requested by the applicant, and as it is in excess of what could be approved by the Development Review Board, the applicant should discuss these numbers with the staff and the Board. It is possible that more information will be needed. 11. The applicant shall provide greater details of the actual number of parking spaces provided and/ or proposed as part of this PUD. The applicant has submitted the details for the surface -level parking spaces for the proposed project. The surface parking spaces meet the standards of Table 13-8 in the Land Development Regulations. The plan showing underground parking spaces lacks a scale. The handicap spaces also appear to be lacking the five foot access aisles required by the SBLDR. 12. The plans depicting the underground parking spaces for Eastwood Commons ll' shall be revised so as to show an accurate scale bar. 13. The handicap spaces shown as part of the underground parking spaces for `Eastwood Commons ll' shall be revised to be in compliance with Section 13.01(l) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. According to Section 13.01(J) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, parking or storage facilities for recreational vehicles shall be provided in all multi -family residential developments of twenty-five (25) units or more. Recreational vehicles shall not be stored on CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\f&m\finaleastwood amend.doc any common open lands other than those specifically approved for such purpose by the DRB through the review process. The Development Review Board may waive this provision only upon a showing by the applicant that the storage and parking of recreational vehicles shall be prohibited within all private and common areas of the development. The plans for this particular building do not specify where recreational vehicle parking is to be provided. The applicant has stated that recreational vehicle parking will not be permitted on the property at this time. The Condominium Association Declaration and By-laws will prohibit occupants from storing recreational vehicles on the property. The applicant has previously and repeatedly stated that possible recreational vehicle parking areas will be addressed at future development proposals for the subject PUD. It is not clear if all existing and proposed association bylaws prohibit recreational vehicle parking on the property. As the project is nearing saturation, this issue should be finalized with this proposal. 14. The applicant shall address the issue of recreational vehicle parking areas at this time Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The proposed building contains one (1) main parking lot that is located to the west of the proposed building. This location suitably meets this criterion. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. According to Section 3.07 (D) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the maximum height of a pitched -roof structure shall be 40' above average pre -construction grade. The average pre -construction grade for the subject lot is 216 feet. The applicant has stated that the highest point of the proposed building will be 53.25' above the average pre -construction grade and therefore requires a height waiver for 13.25'. The applicant has requested a 19' height waiver to account for any unforeseen site conditions. 15. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board grant the applicant a 19' height waiver, for a total maximum building height of 54' above average pre -construction grade. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Staff has already stated that pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Staff feels this criterion is being met. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\f&m\fnaleastwood amend.doc Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Staff feels this criterion is being met. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The proposed amendment does not pose any opportunities to create access to abutting properties that will reduce curb cuts, improve general access, or improve circulation. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Staff has already stated that pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The site plan depicts screened waste storage facilities. Landscaping and Screening Requirements The previously approved PUD has a landscaping requirement of $72,011 based on building costs of $6,451,050. This landscaping budget proposed and submitted by the applicant is $56,401.25. This is a shortfall of $15, 610. Even if the landscaping requirement is relaxed to only 1 % of the building costs, the applicant is still short $8,110. The applicant should propose a landscaping budget in compliance with the requirement. 16. The landscaping budget shall be revised to be in compliance with Table 13-9 of the SBLDR. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty-eight (28) or more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) square feet. This parking lot for the Eastwood Commons II building contains more than 30 spaces. Staff does not feel that the plans currently depict adequate internal planting islands. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\f&m\finaleastwood amend.doc 17. The landscaping plans shall be revised to depict internal planting islands in compliance with Section 13.06(B) of the SBLDR. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. 18. The plans shall be revised to depict proposed snow storage areas in compliance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations and the City Arborist, as per his comments of August 5, 2005, 19. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. The City Arborist reviewed the plans and provided comments, dated August 5, 2005 (attached). 20. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Arborist, as outlined in his letter dated August 5, 2005. Other 21. The plans shall be revised to show the proposed location of the shed near the Twin Oaks facility marked as "relocate shed. " 22. The plans shall be revised to remove all referrals to proposed signs. The applicant shall obtain sign permits for any proposed signs from the Zoning Administrator in compliance with the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION In order to resolve the outstanding issues stated above, particularly with respect to clarifying the matter of the Ben Franklin Building and the concerns of the Fire Chief, staff recommends that the South Burlington Development Review Board continue Final Plat Application #SD-05-60 to the next hearing of the Board. Respectfully Submitted, C"aihyao LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Eric Farrell, F&M Development SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT July 19, 2005 Civil Engineering Associates Mr. Steve Vock 928 Falls Road Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: O'Dell Parkway Eastwood II Dear Steve: 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As Your project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. Current water distribution system upgrades have been substantially completed that should allow for the construction of your project, pending approval of all other local and State requirements. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District the City of South Burlington Colchester Fire District #1 and the Village of Jericho, henceforth the "CWD Specification." Please add this note to future plans in visible- locations. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with these specifications. Details for this project must be the same as those within the above referenced CWD Specifications. 4. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the "Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 5. Eight -inch and larger Ductile Iron (DI) water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new main shall be six feet (6') to the top of the pipe. 6. Mechanical joint restraints with twist off nuts shall be EBAA or Sigma, or a Department approved equal grip ring. 7. Fire hydrant assemblies shall consist of an anchor tee connected directly to a six-inch RW gate valve, the appropriate length of 6" DI pipe, the fire hydrant, and appropriate thrust block. All hydrants shall meet the aforementioned CWD Specifications, and a hydrant flag shall be supplied with each hydrant. Hydrant shall have all drains plugged prior to installation. Note: Waterous fire hydrants must be installed with a "Boston Operating Nut." 8. Corporations shall be Mueller H-15008 (3/4" -1"), or Mueller H 15013 (1 %"-2") or Cambridge brass. Curb stops shall be Mueller B 25209 or Cambridge brass. All brass unions and adapters shall be Mueller or Cambridge brass. 9. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. 10. Separation between the water main and service line and nearby sanitary and storm sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above referenced Specifications. 11. Prior to any building construction, the building contractor must contact this Department to discuss City requirements for meter sizing, meter settings, and backflow protection. 12. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 13. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 14. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 15. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, a Jay Nadeau Superintendent cc.Cathyann LaRose g Doug Brent Plan Reviews: O'Dell Parkway Eastwood II The following is an outline of the proposed modifications to our Final Subdivision Plat on a per lot basis: PUD Subdivision Plat Changes Subdivision of Lot 1 into three lots and adjustment of the boundary line between Lot 8 and (new) Lot 9 with the following results: Lot 1 - 4.498 acres; Lot 8 - 4.082 acres; (new) Lot 9 - 2.180 acres; and (never) Lot 10 - .83 acres. Lot I - Mixed -Use Building • Reduce the mixed -use building from 126,000 SF to 64,350 SF • Reduce Office use from 70,000 SF to 40,000 SF 011 Reduce Retail Use from 17,000 SF to 7,000 SF a Eliminate 4,000 SF Standard Restaurant Lot 2 - Eastwood Commons Ito ratify field changesi ® Reorientation of the (larger) chiller with landscaping and fencing around m Removal of two parking spaces to accommodate the larger chiller • Addition of a sidewalk connection from Eastvvvood's parking lot to Twin Oak's to encourage pedestrian movements and reduce traffic on the street • Addition of retaining wall and plantings at NE corner of the property to screen GMP's transformer ® Addition of 110' of 4' high stockade fencing along the northerly boundary line to screen the ground floor units from headlights from cars in the Twin Oak's parking lot Transplantation of two large linden trees from in front of the TV station building (Lot 1) to the west end of the Eastwood Commons building (either side of the garage entrance) 0 Other minor planting additions to supplement the overall planting plan Lot 3 - O'Dell Apartments 6 No changes 0 No changes 9,, Page 5 r•. ^ • is i... ® No changes Increase the size of the (previously approved) westerly addition by 210 SF; no change in proposed use and with both additions still serving a maximum of 4 to S members at anyone time, with two additional employees Elimination of the previously approved 23-car surface parking area at the west end of the building and associated landscape Berm ® Retention of existing vegetation, plus new plantings, at the west end of the building Addition of sidewalk connection to Farrell Street to promote pedestrian movement and reduction of overall vehicle trips between lots * Addition of a service driveway to the west end of the existing facility Lot 9 - Eastwood Commons H ® Addition of a 4-story, 71-unit residential condominium building with under - story parking, containing 99,400 SF ® The building will be of the same design and materials used in the recently completed Eastwood Commons building on Lot 2 Lot 10 - Common band ® Placement of the landscape Berm along the north boundary line (abutting Hadley Road neighborhood) unto common ownership within the PUD to insure the long-term care and maintenance of the landscape improvements Recreation Patin The north -south Recreation Path has been relocated to provide a safer and more direct route from the Hadley Road neighborhood to Farrell Street. The path now crosses over Lot 9 (Eastwood Commons II) and Lot 10 (Common Land). The path itself is designed as a paved (off -road) walkway that no longer travels through a vehicle parking lot. Most of the Lot 9 section of the path will be constructed in conjunction with the Lot 9 improvements. The remaining section of the path will only be constructed after public meetings are held between the Hadley Road neighborhood and the City, pursuant to a commitment issued by the City Council back in 2000. 0 Page 6 At the request of a few Hadley Road neighbors, the existing 10' wide Recreation Path on the east side of Farrell Street will be extended north for approximately 240' to terminate at an existing pedestrian crossing at the driveway to 38 Eastwood Drive. This extension will facilitate safer pedestrian crossings over to the west side of Eastwood Drive at that location. As worked out with staff, future landscape bonding will be provided on a per lot basis, commencing with Lot 9, in the amount of $60,000, which represents the full amount of the planting budget. Water & Seger Capacitor A letter is pending from the South Burlington Water Department (water), and has been received from the Burlington Public Works Department (sewer), indicating sufficient capacity to serve the current combination uses proposed for the project. Please schedule us before the Development Review Board at its next available meeting. Enclosures Page 7 LANDSCAPING/LIGHTING LEGEND. B. BARNEY E.IrT. STREET TREE PROPOSED GROUNDCOVE11 BED J. KAHAN PROPOSED PERENNIAL E. A. BOUCHE L. and L. BROOKS M. STACKMAN I L. P. BROOKS M—d J. WARREN Rand J. KOCHMAN IR PROPOSED SHADE TREE - ---- - • E F-ROP05 D PARKING LOT PROPOSED MULTI-5TErl TREE LIC44T FIXTURE PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN PROPOSED FLOWERING TREE LIGHT FIXTURE IAllk A, PROPOSED CONIFER TREE EXIST. FARRELL STREET LIGHT W. WOLFE EXIST PEDESTRIAN I PROPOSED SHRUB O LIGHT FIXTURE I I— • PROPOSED EVERGREEN SHRUB 0 0 -- - - - - -- -- t-H-1— �T 31 L RELOCATED EXI -I STING CIR BERMP L I LAN GS AS SHEET N2A. C CH BUILDING W A 111A NTL TIONS P E FLAGGED IN THE FIELD LL J, I .Ox ----------------------------------------- - ----- - --------------------- ---- ------ --- X 212.2 'D (V CHAMPVAIN EXISTING TUY OIL CO*' INC.. r-) TELEVISION DID F1'E'ON (LOW 217.. NE1W LOCATION OF FFE ER) 211.67.00 SI�ACIN POLE & 21 . .0 -4 X TRICAL BOXES I and R. REYES L------- ---- ;v FREPIL ACE 3 JUNIPER vli��'i I WEED AND MULCH 1, mm 7 1 1 F:7-7 EXISTING BEN FRANKLIN BUILDING A 10 TT (8) (6) 5 OFFICE (35,ODO SF) I RETAIL (7,8f50 SF) 6 RES :OENTIAL UNITS, 42 PARKING UNDERNEATH FFE 217.DO GAR 207.00 Fil 5 z 0 < E.and K. JOHNSON ....... A. MERRILL -- ------- ------------ �� yl —fir-`� \ . �Y L LLJ EASTWOOD COMMONS 11 71 RESIDENTIAL UNITS 64 PARKING UNDERNEATH FIFE 220.00 GAR 210.00 5M.N. A T. J. Boyle and Associates 17777F Fan'dscape architects a planning consultants m'b _ 6-17-06 O'Dell Parkway PUD i. college street e burlington e vermont * 05401 802.658.3555 httpd/—.qbyi..-m 1" = 30'-0" North East Overall Planting Plan N2 Permit Number SD- 0 5- (0 () CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) See Attached List 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) F&M Development Company, LLC PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 (Tel) 658-7400 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Eric Farrell, 210 College Street, Suite 201, Burlington, VT 05401 (Tel) 658-7400 x25 (Fax) 860-3594 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 345-514 Farrell Street 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Most recent amendment #SD-04-36. See attached memo for proposed changes b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) See Attached Memo c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) New building on Lot 9 of 99,380 SF; Lot 8 approved addition increase by 210 SF; Lot 1 reduced building size from 126,000 SF to 48 OOOSF. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) 4-story residential building on Lot 9 (Height Waiver requested — see separate request memo) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Increase from 319 to 386 units f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): See attached memo 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 18.5 (corrected)% b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 66.1 (corrected)% c) Front yard (along each street) Existing_% 9) COST ESTIMATES Proposed 19.7 % Proposed 60.4 % Proposed % a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 6,451,050 (per L&I permit) increase on Lot 9; No change on b) Landscaping: $ Planting Budget for Lot 9 is attached. Bonding for the balance of the project is to be on a per lot basis per discussions with staff. c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC See attached memo a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): total (cumulative) reduction of 180 trips for the entire PUD since original approval (2000). Previous reduction (SD-04-036) was 42 trips. 11)PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12)PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13)ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Entire PUD — projected Spring 2008 14) PLANS AND FEE Flat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. f� C il&d S ATURE F PPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PRO ERTY OWt,4ER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: ( ✓ a7— I have reviewed this final plat application and find it to be: o !pl e Incomplete /)/ A 11 Planning &i Zoning or Designee r Date 01/07/2014 21:29 FAX 001 Awir11-2005 03:28pm From-REDSTONE 8028603594 T-576 P.002/003 F-158 Applicatio}z to the City of Soutb Burlington for: Eastwood Coxrunons TT Duly Authorized Agent for: O'Dell Bond Housing Limited Partnership O'Dell Allocated Housing Limited Partnership Duly Authorized Agent for: Burlington Community Land Trust Duly Authorized Agent for: Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc_ Received Aug-12-2005 08!28am From- To-REDSTONE Page 001 E00 OBEd 3NOlS038-01 su¢-10-g005 10,01Am From^REDSYONE V909 Z98 ZOB-wojj wa1l:Z0 500Z-Ol-Dny pente3e8 8028eD5g4 T-567 P-092/003 F-135 Application to the City of South $urUngton for; Eastwood Gornmons II Duly Authorized Ageirrt for: O'Dell Bond Housing I ;sited partnership O'Dell Allocated Mousing Limited partnership Duly Authorized Agent for: 13urlin.gton Indoor Terui i,s, Inc. coo In Ilaa VSOS Mi 908 XVd OZ:ST 5008/OT/80 09/12i2005 15:11 Auk-10-2005 04:07pm Fror LAKE CHAMPLAIN HOUSING 4 9GO3594 NO.459 902 0 � 608860369d ' t•Drc r.uuciuua �—+• Application UlDell Bond O'Dell Alloc Duly Authr Burlington Duly Au.th Burlington City of South Burlington for. Eastwood Commons XI Agent for: sing Limited Partnership Rousing Limited Partnership Agent for: iurni.ty 'Land Trust Agent for: r Tennis, Inc. e IIII it �i __ Received Aug-12-2005 02:ISpm From-802 864 0734 To-REDSTONE Page 002 11 F&M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 802-863-4541 fax 802-865-1253 Memo To: Ray Belair From: Eric Farrell Date: 7/ 13/05 Re: O'Dell Parkway PUD - Height Waiver on Lot 9 In connection with our application for a 71-unit residential condominium building on (proposed) Lot 9 of our development, we request a height waiver under Section 3.07 F (2) of the Land Development Regulations. Reference is made to the following plans: • Existing Conditions Plan (drawing C-1, last revised 6/ 17/05) • Eastwood Phase II Grading + Drainage Plan (drawing C-4A, last revised 6/ 17/05) • Eastwood Commons II Elevations North Wir (sheetA400, dated 6/21/05) • Eastwood Commons II Elevations North Wir (sheet A401, dated 6/21/05) • Eastwood Commons II Elevations East Win# (sheet A402, dated 6/21/05) The Average Pre -construction Grade (APG) on Lot 9 is 216.0 feet. The average post - construction grade on Lot 9 will be 218.0 feet. The main roof of the 4-story building will extend 48.25' above the APG to elevation 264.25'. The stairwells at the north end and east end of the building will extend 49.25' above the APG to elevation 265.25'. The elevator shaft in the middle of the building will extend 53.25' above the APG to elevation 269.25'. Due to the potential for field adjustments necessary to accommodate unseen site conditions, we request approval for a maximum height to elevation 270.0', requiring a waiver of 19'. The proposed building meets all of the objectives of the applicable zoning district and does not detract from important public scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. 0 Page 2 LIST OF ADJOINERS / PARTIES Antonio B. Pomerleau Pomerleau Family Trust 69 College Street Burlington, VT 05402 Roger Hutchins Brenda Hutchins 9 White Lilac Way Colchester, VT 05446 Robert Lake Sherwood D. Lake 514 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05403 Mark Bradley Linda D. Bradley 507 Shelburne St. Burlington, VT 05403 Ronald Morin Michele Morin 501 Shelburne St. Burlington, VT 05403 Champlain Oil Co., Inc. P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Thomas Family Trust et al Herman and Mavis Thomas c/o Gary Franklin Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd. 150 South Champlain Street P.O. Box 1489 Burlington, VT 05402-1489 Thomas Family Trust et al Attn: Michael Dowling 518 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05407 Thomas Family Trust et al Herman and Mavis Thomas 64 Southwind Drive Burlington, VT 05401 Deimer Properties, Inc. P.O. Box 64678 Burlington, VT 05406 David M. Farrell Stewart H. McConaughy 76 St. Paul Street 7t' Floor Burlington, VT 05407 Acadia Heathcote LLC c/o Acadia Realty Trust 1311 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 260 White Plains, NY 10605 State of Vermont (RE: Correctional Facility) 2 Governor Aiken Drive Montpelier, VT 05633 60 Farrell St. Associates PO Box 421 Burlington, VT 05402-0421 Olympiad Court Associates 70 Farrell Street South Burlington, VT 05403 O'Dell Allocated Housing Limited Partnership c/o HV Marketplace Inc 123 St. Paul Street Burlington, VT 05401 O'Dell Bond Housing Limited Partnership c/o HV Marketplace Inc 123 St. Paul Street Burlington, VT 05401 Lake Champlain Housing Development Corporation 220 Riverside Avenue Burlington, VT 05401 2 D.B. Morrissey LLC PO Box 421 Burlington, VT 05402-0421 E.F. Farrell LLC PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Interstate 189 State of Vermont Agency of Transportation District #5 P.O. Box 168 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Albert and Rita Reyes P.O. Box 537 Wallingford, VT 05773 Warren Wolfe 138 Woodlawn Road Burlington, VT 05401 Farrell Corporation 5 Holmes Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Alice Boucher P.O. Box 5573 Essex Junction, VT 05433 Louise P. Brooks 33 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Bernard B. Barney Joel Kahan Marvin Starkman 37 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Mike and Pam Hennessey 65 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 3 e Victoria Brooks Bevins 67-69 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Damon Petrie 71-73 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Frank & Jennifer Kochman 75 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Brendan & Monica Taylor 80 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Alisha Cunha 80 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Lorna -Kay Peal Michael Smolin 189 Poker Hill Road Underhill, VT 05489 Nathaniel Merrill 99 Hadley Road S. Burlington, VT 05403 Denise A. Blanchard 103 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Madeline P. Cervvini 111 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Arline F. Barovick 916 South Prospect St. Burlington, VT 05401 Catherine Mceahern 117 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 4 Nancy E. Osborne 119 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 David M. Farrell & Stewart H. McConaughy Trustees of the Thomas A. Farrell Trust c/o Farrell Corporation 5 Holmes Road South Burlington, VT 05403 David M. Farrell, Trustee of the David M. Farrell Trust c/o Farrell Corporation 5 Holmes Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Peter Doremus, Esq. Doremus & Kantor PO Box 445 Burlington, VT 05402-0445 Eric F. Farrell PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Stephen A. Vock, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Michael Crane, Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 9 Warren Coleman, Esq. , Environ. Lit. Atty. Brett Rosenthall / Errol Tabacco Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street — Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 Tim Barritt 71 Meadow Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Elise Guyette & David Shiman 22 Orchard Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Amy L. Gamble, PE Technical Services / Vermont Agency of Transportation 133 State Street Montpelier, VT 05633 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Carol Shea, Chair / Patricia Tivnan / Ralph Montefusce 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Ernie Christianson, Env. Analyst V ANR, 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 518 Corporation d/b/a Ben Franklin c/o James Carroll / Mark Dowling 697 Hercules Drive, Suite #2 Colchester, VT 05446 Christopher Owen, VT Dept. of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Dan Gaherty, Efficiency Vemront 255 South Champlain Street Burlington, VT 05401 n Greg Rabideau Rabideau Architects 286 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Michael Kiey, Esq. 26 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 FEP II c/o 697 Hercules Drive, Suite # 2 Colchester, VT 05446 7 Parcel Size - Square Feet (includes Ben Franklin) 1,082,205 100.0% O'Dell Parkway PUD Farrell Street South Burlington, Vermont Lot Coverage Summary (7/8/05) Remarks Building Building Coverage Coverage (square feet) (percentage) Overall Overall Coverage Coverage (square feet) (percentage) Error Per Existing Final Plat Approval (#50-04-36) as presented in June 2004 200,450 18.8% 605,065 56.8% Per Existing Final Plat Approval (#SD-04-36) corrected 199,930 18.5% 715,740 66.1% 9.3% Current Application Changes Lot 1 - Mixed Uses decrease parking/walkways (70,995) Lot 1 - Mixed Uses decrease building footprint (12,885) (12,885) Lot 2 - Residential Use decrease parking area (325) Lot 2 - Residential Use add walkway connection to Lot 8 60 Lot 3 - Residential Use No Change Lot 4 - Residential Use No Change Lot 5 - Common Land No Change ° Lot 6 - Common Land No Change Lot 7 - Common Land No Change Lot 8 - Twin Oak Sports 8c Fitness delete previously approved 23-car parking (7,975) Lot 8 - Twin Oak Sports & Fitness add service drive 2,380 Lot 8 - Twin Oak Sports & Fitness increase west addition footprint 210 210 Lot 8 - Twin Oak Sports & Fitness add sidewalk connection to Lot 9 1,375 Lot 9 - Residential Use (formally part of Lot 1) add new residential building 26,195 26,195 Lot 9 - Residential Use (formally part of Lot 1) add parking/walkways inc inc Lot 10 - Common Land (formally part of Lot 1) No Change - - - lCoverage Totals 1 1 213,450 1 19.7%1 653,780 I 60.4%1 1 O'Dell Parkway PUD Farrell Street South Burlington, Vermont Parking Summary (7/8/05) Lot Number Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Required Provided Waiver Waiver Type Amount Percentage (surface vs under -story) Per Existing Final Plat Approval (#SD-04-36) Entire PUS 1,078 1,030 48 4.5% both Proposed Changes Reduce Office from 70,000 SF to 40,000 SF 1 (105) surface Reduce Retail from 17,000 SF to 7,000 SF 1 (50) surface Eliminate 4,000 SF Restaurant 1 (88) surface + under -story Reduce Residential from 10 to 6 units 1 (9) surface + under -story No Use Changes 2 surface + under -story No Use Changes 3 surface No Use Changes 4 surface + under -story Common Land 5 n/a Common Land 6 n/a Common Land 7 n/a No Use Changes 7 8 surface Additional Residential Units 9 S surface + under -story Common Land 10 n/a Revised Parking Totals (Per Today's Request) 9 824 1 16 o surface + under -story MA O'Dell Parkway PUD Farrell Street South Burlington, Vermont Traffic Impact Summary (7/8/05) Lot Existing Use / Size Approved Total Proposed Total Number Uses External Use External (#SD-04-36) Trip (today's request) Trip Ends Ends 1 TV Station (16,000 sf) TV Station (16,000 sf) 95 TV Station (16,000 sf) 95 1 Car Wash To be demolished n/a To be demolished n/a 1 Vacant Retail (17,000 sf) 165 Retail (7,000 sf) 68 1 Vacant 80 Seat Restaurant (4,000 sf) 28 Deleted 28 1 Vacant General Office (70,000 sf) 156 General Office (40,000 sf) 89 1 Vacant Residential (10 Units) 4 Residential (6 Units) 3 2 Residential (89 Units) Residential (89 Units) 38 Residential (89 Units) 38 3 Residential (160 Units) Residential (160 Units) 68 Residential (160 Units) 68 4 Residential (60 Units) Residential (60 Units) 26 Residential (60 Units) 26 5 Common Land Common Land n/a Common Land n/a 6 Common Land Common Land n/a Common Land n/a 7 Common Land Common Land n/a Common Land n/a 8 Indoor Recreational Facility Addition (4,430 sf) 10 Addition (4,640 sf) 10 9 Vacant n/a n/a Residential (71 Units) 30 10 Vacant/Common Land n/a n/a Common Land n/a 590 455 Original PUD Approval (632) Original PUD Approval (632) Net Increase (Decrease) (42) Net Increase (Decrease) (177) No Text ODELL EASTWOOD 11 PLANTING SCHEDULE Trees 6/16/2005 Qty. Code Common Name Size Spec Notes wholesale installed 6 AFAB ACER x freemani 'Autumn Blaze' Autumn Blaze Maple 2.5" cal. B&B $ 170.00 $ 2,550.00 4 AGA Amelanchier x grandiflora'Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 7-8' ht. B&B multi -stem $ 145.00 $ 1,450.00 7 ARE ACER rubrum'Embers' R ed Maple 2.5" cal. B&B $ 170.00 $ 2,975.00 2 ARH Amelanchier x g. 'Robin Hill' Robinhill Serviceberry 7-8' ht. B&B multi -stem $ 145.00 $ 725.00 7 BP BETULA papyifera Paper Birch 10-12' ht. B&B multi -stem $ 125.00 $ 2,187.50 3 CCI CRATAEGUS crusgalli inermis Crusader Hawthorn 7-8' ht. B&B multi -stem $ 118.00 $ 885.00 6 FPP FRAXINUS p. 'Patmore' Patmore Ash 2.5" cal. B&B $ 165.00 $ 2,475.00 12 LID LARIX decidua European Larch 6-8' B&B $ 115.00 $ 3,450.00 4 MLM Magnolia x'Loebneri'Merrill' Leonard Messel Magnolia 10'-12' B&B $ 120.00 $ 1,200.00 4 MZC MALUS zumi 'Calocarpa' Redbud Crab 3" cal. B&B $ 175.00 $ 1,750.00 7 PS PINUS strobus Eastern White Pine 6-T B&B $ 95.00 $ 1,662.50 4 PRS Prunus sargent Sargent Cherry 2.5" cal. B&B $ 185.00 $ 1,850.00 7 QR QUERCUS rubra Red Oak 3"-3.5" cal. B&B $ 250.00 $ 4,375.00 4 SAT SALIX alba'Tristis' Golden Weeping Willow 2.5" cal. B&B $ 140.00 $ 1,400.00 12 SR SYRINGA reticulata'Japanese True Lilac' Japanese True Lilac 2.5" cal. B&B $ 132.00 $ 31960.00 sub -total $ 32,895.00 Shrubs Qty. Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Sec wholesale installed 6 CA CLETHRA alnifolia Summersweet 24" B&B $ 18.00 $ 270.00 16 DG DEUTZIA gracilis Slender Deutzia 24" B&B $ 16.00 $ 640.00 6 FAD FORSYTHIA x'Arnold Dwarf Arnold Dwarf Forsythia 24" #3 Cont. $ 16.00 $ 240.00 6 FSS FORSYTHIA suspenda sieboldi Siebold Weeping Forsythia 30" #3 Cont. $ 15.00 $ 225.00 24 IGC ILEX glabra'Compacta' Dwarf Inkberry 30" #5 Cont. $ 35.00 $ 2,100.00 8 JBH JUNIPERUS horizontal is 'Bar Harbor' Bar Harbor Juniper 24" #5 Cont. $ 24.00 $ 480.00 45 JCOG JUNPERUS ch. 'Old Gold' Old Gold Juniper 18" #3 Cont. $ 12.50 $ 1,406.25 15 JVGO JUNPERUS virginiana'Gre Owl' Grey Owl Juniper 181, #3 Cont. $ 12.00 $ 450.00 4 RCA RHODODENDRON catawbiense'Alba' White Catawba Rhododendron 30" B&B $ 35.00 $ 350.00 9 RPJM RHODODENDRON 'P.J. M.' P.J.M. Rhododendron 24" B&B $ 28.00 $ 630.00 7 RRE RHODODENDRON'Roseum Elegans' Roseum Elegans Rhododendron 30" B&B $ 35.00 $ 612.50 90 RR ROSA rugosa Rugosa Rosa 24" #3 Cont. 4' O.C. $ 10.50 $ 2,362.50 50 SJLP SPIREAjaponica Little Princess Spirea 18" #3 Cont. $ 13.25 $ 1,656.25 7 SBLP SPIREA x. b. 'Lemon Princess' Lemon Princess Spirea 24" B&B $ 16.00 $ 280.00 20 TMD TAXUS x m. 'Densiformis' Dense Yew 30" B&B $ 30.00 $ 1,500.00 75 TOH THUJA occidentalis 'Holmstrup' Holmstrup Arborvitae 3.5' B&B 3' O.C. $ 30.00 $ 5,625.00 39 TON THUJA occidentalis 'Nigra' Dark American Arborvitae 5.5-6' Ht. B&B $ 38.00 $ 3,705.00 8 VC VIBURNUM carlesii 'Cayuga' Cayuga Viburnum 24" B&B $ 30.00 $ 600.00 2 VPT VUBURNUM p. t. 'Mariesii' Maires Doublefile Viburnum 5' B&B $ 38.00 $ 190.00 3 1 VTC VUBURNUM trilobum 'Compactum' Compact American Cranberrybush 3 B&B $ 24.50 $ 183.75 sub -total $ 23,506.25 Groundcovers & Perrenials Qty. Code Scientific Name I Common Name I Size I Spec I I wholesale installed Bulb Allowance Locations to be specified I I $ 600.00 124 HH Daylilly Mix` 1 1 gal. Cont. 24" O.C. $ 5.00 $ 1,550.00 54 IS Iris siberica ISiberian Iris 1gal. I Cont. 24" O.C. $ 5.00 $ 675.00 * Daylily mix to be equal quantities of Hemerocal lis 'Green Flutter', 'Happy Returns', and 'Hyperion' sub -total $ 2,825.00 Total $ 59,226.25 Schedule of Lot Owners Lot 1 F&M Development Company, LLC Lot 2 F&M Development Company, LLC Lot 3 O'Dell Bond Housing Limited Partnership O'Dell Allocated Housing Limited Partnership Lot 4 The Burlington Community Land Trust Lot 5 O'Dell Parkway PUD Association, Inc. Lot 6 O'Dell Parkway PUD Association, Inc. Lot 7 O'Dell Parkway PUD Association, Inc. Lot 8 Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc. Cathyann LaRose From: Al Loiselle [al@cea-vt.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 12:30 PM To: Cathy Larose Cc: Eric Farrell Subject: O'dell Pud Cathy, Attached file is a revised spreadsheet with lot coverages for Lot 9 & Lot 10. Lot 1 numbers changed as a result. Ben Franklin is not part of the impervious coverages shown. You ask me to get the percent of front yard coverage for Lot 9. This has not been an issue for this PUD. Let me know if you need anymore information. Al 8/ 12/2005 UDELL PARKWAY PROJECT 2005 PLANNED COVERAGE DESC LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 ILOT 10 R.O.W. TOTALS GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN IGREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN IGREEN GREEN 622 230' 7,a69 1,431 2287 533 475 6,6n n,763 55 2,576 43,240 1,314 418 4,9241 32,646 250 2.194 198 - 365 309; 328 445, 1,017 277 177 - 9 69 474 - 112 3241 - 7,343 8,411 1,197 3,443 80 138 9,855 1.782 198 927 3,416 - 107 i 230 230 - 5291 12.945 2,883 _171 2 044 -- 5,222 1,729f _-10,647 4.446f 475[ Be — 97 108 -127 1,294 --- 84 - 287 7.068 168 - 12,098 572 _ 2,528 — --- 1,4701 28 - 240 - - 3,403 73 39 -- - --.-- .. 223 166 _ 540 .._ 543 - 280 2.612 L 418�--- 4,98Lf --__-- - - - - 126 1,048 375 513 2,386 91 164 _.._ 16 1,220 586,' 3.024r- 3.911 6,934 533 149 -118 _ 1,88'l - - _ _.: - - 216 3 542 '-- - 6.758 _ - 131 159 Iss _ 288 15,321 368 58 __--_ __.-. 301 27 _ — 7f1 1 656 681 234 1,417L 1,718 2971 113 313 1.095 83 — 2121 I m 264 _ 4.0150 — 3.752 -- _ _ _ 137 �T-',391 4.902 --6,273 1511 3.044 319 1 TOTAL 45 715 a 540 0.800 0 833 33 9 ;.Ls' 0.223' 1.896 77,243 1.773 17999 9.598 24.180 635,282 14.584 a- 60%� 3,7721 61,515 35,043 1.412 0.804 4.08Z 2.180 31,085 80,405 26.330 77,798 .792 AC lOT SIZE 1.049 0.714 _4 498' 2.203 -t50,2171 1.848 4.449 113,393 - 0.004 1.786 0.271 1.601 1.78'6 0.�2 43,4101 -0 5,281 0.997' 0.000 0.121 38%, 1ao% 69%, 62%1 0% -31%; 0.087 0.180 3,196 IMP SF IMP. AC 64,878 11628% 59,818 1445 0033 3.449 1-489 23% 32% 2,603 41% 0.073 2,6701 -- 1.3701 % GREEN 59% 54% - 46% 35% - 63% 37%; - 63%I 98% 4% 11% _89% %COV - -- 7796 68% TOTAL PUD LOTSIZE = 24.18ACRES TOTAL DISCHARGE AREA TO ENGLESBY BROOK WITH BEN FRANKLIN) = 3.698 ACRES TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA TO ENGLESBY BROOK = 3.097 ACRES TOTAL DISCHARGE AREA TO ENGLESBY BROOK {WITHOUT BEN FRANKLIN) - 3.275 ACRES TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA TO ENGLESBY BROOK = 2.675 ACRES TOTAL DISCHARGE AREA TO POTAH BROOK=20.905 ACRES TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA TO POTASH BROOK = 11.909 ACRES TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 14.584 ACRES UDELL PARKWAY: 2005 COVERAGE EVALUATION B10V20M06 A F&M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-658-7400 fax 802-860-3594 Memo To: Ray Belair From: Eric Farrell Date: 7/ 13/ 05 Re: O'Dell Parkway PUD - Final Subdivision Plat As enumerated herein in more detail, we seek permission to amend our Final Subdivision Plat, generally resulting in a reduction in the size and use of the mixed - use building currently approved on Lot 1 and the addition of a new 71-unit residential condominium building on (to -be -created) Lot 9. In this connection, enclosed please find the following materials for your review: • Application For Final Subdivision Plat Review • Application Fee in the amount of $125 • Owners of Record [the following two drawings, depicting several minor modifications, represent "as built" conditions at the recently completed Eastwood Commons property at 370 Farrell Street (Lot 2)] • O'Dell Parkway PUD Eastwood Commons Landscape and Lighting Plan (sheet N3, last revised 6/ 17/05) • Eastwood Commons - Site Sign (8.5 x 11 color) [the following drawings represent proposed modifications to the next phase of our development on Lot 1, which is to be subdivided into Lots 1, 9 and 10] • Final Plat O'Dell Parkway PUD Eastwood II (Cover Sheet) • Revised Final Plat O'Dell Parkway PUD (Sheet 1, dated 6/20/05) • Existing Conditions Plan (drawing C-1, last revised 6/ 17/05) • Site Plan (drawing C-2, last revised 6/ 17/05) • Overall Site Plan (drawing C-3, last revised 6/ 17/05) • Eastwood Phase II Grading + Drainage Plan (drawing C-4A, last revised 6/ 17/05) • Eastwood Phase II Utilities Plan (drawing C-5A, last revised 6/ 17/05) • Eastwood Phase Il Erosion Control Plan (drawing C-6A, last revised 6/ 17/05) • Utility Details + Sections (drawing C-8, last revised 4/ 12/05) • Site Details + Sections (drawing C-8, last revised 4/ 12/05) • Site Details + Sections (drawing C-8.1, dated 5/5/05) • Storm Drainage + Erosion Control Details (drawing C-9, last revised 4/ 12/05) • Specifications (drawing C-10, last revised 4/ 12/05) • Specifications (drawing C-11, last revised 4/ 12/05) • Specifications (drawing C-12, last revised 4/ 12/05) • Specifications (drawing C-13, last revised 4/ 12/05) • North East Overall Planting Plan (sheet N2, dated 6/ 17/05) • O'Dell Parkway PUD Eastwood Commons II Landscape Plan (sheet N2.1, dated 6/ 17/05) • O'Dell Parkway PUD Lot 1 Landscape & Lighting Plan (sheet N2.2, dated 6/ 17/05) • Page 2 • O'Dell Parkway PUD Landscape 8s Lighting Details (sheet N2.4, dated 6/ 17/05) • ODell Parkway PUD Landscape 8s Lighting Plan (sheet N2.5, dated 6/ 17/05) • O'Dell Parkway PUD Twin Oaks Planting Plan (sheet N5, last 6/ 17/05) • Eastwood Commons II Elevations North Wind (sheet A400, dated 6/21/05) • Eastwood Commons II Elevations North Wind (sheet A401, dated 6/21/05) • Eastwood Commons II Elevations East Wing (sheet A402, dated 6/21/05) • Eastwood Commons II Garage Plan - North Wing (sheet A200, dated6 / 21 / 05) • Mixed -Use Office/Retail/Residential Building -Elevations (sheet 1, dated 7/8/05) • O'Dell Parkway PUD - Eastwood Commons II (Impervious Calculations) (dated 6/ 17/05) • O'Dell Eastwood II Planting Schedule ($58,226) • Lot Coverage Summary • Parking Summary • Traffic Impact Summary Street Tree Relocation I have enclosed a plan entitled "O'Dell Parkway PUD Eastwood Commons II Tree Relocation Plan" (sheet R2, dated 6/ 17/05), depicting the transplantation of 15 existing street trees from the north side of Farrell Street that would otherwise be compromised when we construct the next phase of our project. Similar to our strategy when we constructed Eastwood Commons on Lot 2, we will replace these trees at the completion of construction of improvements on Lot 1. I have reviewed this strategy with Bruce Hoar. 0 Page 3 Lot Coverage Summary During in the process of reviewing our overall impervious surface calculations for the purpose of monitoring our Stormwater Discharge Permit, our civil engineer discovered a discrepancy in the coverage calculations we have been presenting to the City for zoning purposes, which calculations, unfortunately, were not prepared by them. The Lot Coverage Summary we provided at our most recent Final Plat amendment (June 2005) represented total building coverage at 18.8% and overall lot coverage at 56.8%. In fact, our total building coverage is 18.5% and our overall lot coverage is 66.1%. Both of these calculations include the Ben Franklin property, which (technically) is not part of our PUD and which is nearly 100% covered. The Lot Coverage Summary provided with today's application corrects that error and summarizes the changes we propose and the resulting total building coverage (19.7%) and overall lot coverage (60.4%). We apologize for the error, which has gone undetected by us for several years. Traffic Impact Summary The Traffic Impact Summary provided, in support of today's application, represents a 28% reduction of PM peak hour vehicle trips, as a result of our proposed changes. Parking Summary The Parking Summary depicts the changes in required and provided parking and the parking waiver requested as a result of today's proposed amendment. You will notice that the decrease in non-residential space and its replacement with more residential units necessitates an increase in our parking waiver request from 48 spaces (4.5%) to 162 (16.4%), on a purely technical basis. We believe this waiver is fully justified for the following reasons: 1. The number of spaces provided on Lot 3 (160 units) equals 1.3 spaces per unit and has proven to be very adequate for this project, which has enjoyed full occupancy since its completion in 2002; and 2. We are providing interconnecting walkways between Farrell Street and the Twin Oak's facility to encourage pedestrian traffic and reduce overall vehicle trips between uses; and 3. There are sufficient non-residential uses within the project to promote shared parking conditions, especially when you consider the Shaw's Supermarket complex and the Ben Franklin store, which appear to be frequented by many of the new Farrell Street residents traveling on foot. For the record, the available parking on Lot 4 (City's Edge) equals 1.8 spaces per unit and on Lot 2 (Eastwood Commons) equals 1.7 spaces per unit. The parking proposed for Eastwood Commons II on Lot 9 equals 1.9 spaces per unit. 0 Page 4 The following is an outline of the proposed modifications to our Final Subdivision Plat on a per lot basis: PUD Subdivision Plat Changes • Subdivision of Lot 1 into three lots and adjustment of the boundary line between Lot 8 and (new) Lot 9 with the following results: Lot 1 - 4.498 acres; Lot 8 - 4.082 acres; (new) Lot 9 - 2.180 acres; and (new) Lot 10 - .83 acres. I'r Lot 1 - Mixed -Use Building • Reduce the mixed -use building from 126,000 SF to 64,350 SF • Reduce Office use from 70,000 SF to 40,000 SF • Reduce Retail Use from 17,000 SF to 7,000 SF • Eliminate 4,000 SF Standard Restaurant Lot 2 - Eastwood Commons Ito ratify field changes) • Reorientation of the (larger) chiller with landscaping and fencing around • Removal of two parking spaces to accommodate the larger chiller • Addition of a sidewalk connection from Eastwood's parking lot to Twin Oak's to encourage pedestrian movements and reduce traffic on the street • Addition of retaining wall and plantings at NE corner of the property to screen GMP's transformer • Addition of 110' of 4' high stockade fencing along the northerly boundary line to screen the ground floor units from headlights from cars in the Twin Oak's parking lot • Transplantation of two large linden trees from in front of the TV station building (Lot 1) to the west end of the Eastwood Commons building (either side of the garage entrance) • Other minor planting additions to supplement the overall planting plan Lot 3 - O'Dell Apartments • No changes Lot 4 - City's Edge • No changes • Page 5 Lot 5, 6 & 7 - Common Land • No changes Lot 8 - Twin Oaks • Increase the size of the (previously approved) westerly addition by 210 SF; no change in proposed use and with both additions still serving a maximum of 4 to 8 members at any one time, with two additional employees • Elimination of the previously approved 23-car surface parking area at the west end of the building and associated landscape Berm • Retention of existing vegetation, plus new plantings, at the west end of the building • Addition of sidewalk connection to Farrell Street to promote pedestrian movement and reduction of overall vehicle trips between lots • Addition of a service driveway to the west end of the existing facility Lot 9 - Eastwood Commons H • Addition of a 4-story, 71-unit residential condominium building with under - story parking, containing 99,400 SF • The building will be of the same design and materials used in the recently completed Eastwood Commons building on Lot 2 Lot 10 - Common Land • Placement of the landscape Berm along the north boundary line (abutting Hadley Road neighborhood) unto common ownership within the PUD to insure the long-term care and maintenance of the landscape improvements Recreation Path The north -south Recreation Path has been relocated to provide a safer and more direct route from the Hadley Road neighborhood to Farrell Street. The path now crosses over Lot 9 (Eastwood Commons II) and Lot 10 (Common Land). The path itself is designed as a paved (off -road) walkway that no longer travels through a vehicle parking lot. Most of the Lot 9 section of the path will be constructed in conjunction with the Lot 9 improvements. The remaining section of the path will only be constructed after public meetings are held between the Hadley Road neighborhood and the City, pursuant to a commitment issued by the City Council back in 2000. • Page 6 At the request of a few Hadley Road neighbors, the existing 10' wide Recreation Path on the east side of Farrell Street will be extended north for approximately 240' to terminate at an existing pedestrian crossing at the driveway to 38 Eastwood Drive. This extension will facilitate safer pedestrian crossings over to the west side of Eastwood Drive at that location. Landscapin As worked out with staff, future landscape bonding will be provided on a per lot basis, commencing with Lot 9, in the amount of $60,000, which represents the full amount of the planting budget. Water & Sewer Capacity A letter is pending from the South Burlington Water Department (water), and has been received from the Burlington Public Works Department (sewer), indicating sufficient capacity to serve the current combination uses proposed for the project. Please schedule us before the Development Review Board at its next available meeting. Enclosures 0 Page 7 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNE",TG & ZONHIG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMOT'4T 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 11, 2005 Eric Farrell F & M Development Co, LLC PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Farrell Street Dear Eric: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy Me o ugh Planning & oning Assitant Encl. CITY OF OBURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 WEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING ,July 27, 2005 F & M Development Company c/o Eric Farrell P® Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 r Dear Pro�wner: � % Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Please call our office at 846-41o6 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 4 4 Betsy McD nough Planning Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON FWEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONIN 5-5 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4to6 i July 27, 2005 Antonio B. Pomerleau Pomerleau Family Trust 69 College Street Burlington, VT 05402 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4lo6, stop by during reg lar office hours, or attend the schedule U public hearing. Sincerely, kL 1119" Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. > iegais PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, August 16, 2005, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD-05- 62 of Shearer Chevrolet, Inc. to amend a.previously approved planned unit development for an existing 48,538 sq. ft. gfa of auto sales and service facility and 26,358 sq. ft. expansion. The amendment consists of: 1) minor adjustments to proposed expansion which will increase expansion to 27,539 sq. ft., and 2) other site modifications, 1675 Shelburne Road. 2. Final plat application #SD-05- boundary line adjustment between lots #8 & 9, 3) reduce size of mixed -use building to 64,350 sq. ft. to include 40,000 sq. ft. of office use, 7,000 sq. ft. of retail use and six (6) dwelling units, 4) site modifications to 370 Farrell St, 5) increasing the expansion of indoor recreational facility by 210 sq. ft to 4,460 sq. ft., and 6) constructing a 71 unit 4-story multi -family dwelling on tot #9, Farrell St. 3. Final plat application #SD-05- 63 of Werner Properties, LLC for a planned unit development con- sisting of: 1) razing a 16 room motel and single family dwelling, 2) constructing a 6,000 sq. ft. 2-story multi -use building (requesting umbrella approval), and 3) constructing a 14 unit multi -family dwelling, 490 Shelburne Road. 4. Application #CU-05-13 of Ready Funeral Home for condi- tional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to: 1) raze the existing buildings, and 2) construct a 3168 sq. ft. build- ing for funeral home and morti- tiary use (crematorium & office), 75 Allen Road. 5. Final plat application #SD-05- 67 of University Mall Realty Trust to amend a previously approved planned unit develop- ment consisting of a 675,115 sq. ft. GFA shopping center complex with 614,338 sq. ft. of GLA. The amendment consists of: 1) raz- ing an existing single family dwelling, and 2) constructing a 2,624 sq. ft. retail store, 155 Dorset Street. 6. Appeal #AO-05-02 of Wesco, Inc. appealing decision of Administrative Officer dated 7/8/05 relative to 1041 Shelburne Road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board July 27, 2005 TO: Julie Beth Hoover, Director Department of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlingto , Vennont Fro= Eric Farrell CC: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer Date: 10/15/2003 Re: September 16, 2003 meeting with DRB Ray recently sent me the minutes from the September 16, 2003 DRB meeting at which we proposed to amend our O'Dell Parkway PUD Final Plat by converting the use on Lot 4 from a 95-room extended -stay hotel to 60 residential units. As I related to you soon after the meeting by telephone, we are disturbed by some general comments made by board members at the meeting regarding our project. Reading the meeting minutes reminds us of how inappropriate we believe some of the comments actually were, as cited below. (For your convenience, I numbered each paragraph of the minutes for reference). Re paragraph 4 The view traveling westbound on 1-189 by the project site is not affected. While the building will be visible to westbound travelers, it will not be so in any significant way, in part, due to existing and planned landscaping and also because you would need to take your eyes off the road and look to your right as you approach the site, and then over your right shoulder as you pass by the site. The "New Jersey" comment suggests a personal bias that has no place on the board. The location of the building is exactly the same as the currently approved hotel, meeting all setback requirements from the Interstate. Re paragraph 5 Access to the building for fire protection is exactly the same as for the currently approved hotel. In our opinion, the DRB should defer to the Fire Chief on this point. Re paragraph 6 I have no idea what new precedent would be set, unless the reference is to height waivers, which precedent was set many years ago. In the newly adopted Land Development Regulations, "innovation in design and layout, efficient use of land, and the viability of infill development and re -development" is encouraged within PUD's. Allowing greater height serves to reduce building footprints and results in more efficient land utilization. The statement about not supporting a height waiver because the use should be commercial seems disconnected and not the standard by which such decisions are to be made. Re Daraaraoh 7 The ink is hardly dry on the new Land Development Regulations, which were adopted after much public debate by the Planning Commission and the City Council. This specific area of the City was targeted for increased residential infill development, precisely as represented by our project. The new Shaw's re -development and Ben Franklin store contribute to the mixed -use fabric of this 35-acre neighborhood. These properties also shared in the infrastructure costs of our development and collaborated on master planning issues, albeit not without some controversy. Re Daraoraoh 15 As you know, this type of housing tends to attract significantly fewer children. Urban living, with all of its convenience to neighborhood services and public transportation, is not for everyone and should not be judged with a "one -size -fits -all" mentality. Comments like "stuffing people" are inappropriate and subjective and also represent a bias that has no place on the board. The overall issue of recreational opportunities was addressed when the project was first approved and there is an impact fee system in place to provide resources to fund recreational facilities in strategic locations throughout the City. In General The Planning Commission recognized the connection between height and density when it passed the new regulations. To achieve the targeted density of 15 units per acre, greater building height must be considered, especially as a way to mitigate overall lot coverage. Notwithstanding, we understand this particular building location is likely the most sensitive site within our development in terms of visibility from Route 7 and the eastbound on -ramp of 1-189. Therefore, we will return on November 4th with a flat roof design having a maximum height of less than the 40' height of the currently approved hotel. This more efficient design also affords us the opportunity to invest more resources into the exterior siding materials, where the impact will be the most appreciated. Other building locations within the development will be offered with taller buildings, including a 4-story residential building on Lot 2 (also to be considered by the DRB at its November 4t' meeting), requiring a height waiver. Finally, we believe the DRB must take into consideration that the O'Dell Parkway PUD project was fully permitted in 2001, and that in good faith and in reliance upon those permits, we invested nearly $2.OM in up -front infrastructure costs (public street, state-of-the-art stone water system, sewer, water, etc.). Our existing permits notwithstanding, the process must remain fluid and collaborative. Like many multi- year developments, we must have the flexibility to return from time to time to modify our plans to reflect changing market conditions and newly passed land use regulations. 0 Page 2 Permitting and building -out any large-scale project requires a dynamic relationship between the developer and the municipality, one that hopefully reflects a high level of trust allowing changing times and conditions to be reasonably considered. We are committed to continuing a collaborative working relationship with the City as we endeavor to achieve a successful build -out of this project over the next 4 — 5 years. Enclosure 0 Page 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 SEPTEMBER 2003 - 7 - 7. Public Hearing: Final Plat application #SD-03-58 of F&M Development Company, LLC to amend a planned unit development consisting of: 1) a 95 room hotel, 2) 160 residential units in four buildings, 3) a 130 unit congregate housing facility, 4) subdividing two parcels of 24,458 acres into eight lots, 5) a 90,000 sq. ft. building which will include 11,000 sq. ft. of retail, 150 seat 7500 sq. ft. restaurant, 70,000 sq. ft. of general office, 2500 sq. ft. drive -in -bank, and ten residential units, 6) a 7200 sq. ft., addition to an indoor recreational facility, and 7) an existing 16,000 sq. ft. television studio and office building. The amendment consists of replacing the proposed 95 room hotel with a four story 60-unit multi -family dwelling 409 Farrell Street: Mr. Farrell said the current plan concerns lot #4 of the PUD. They want to change the approved hotel to a 60-unit condo building. He showed a plan of just that lot and indicated that the footprint is almost identical to that of the hotel as is parking. They will be requesting a height waiver to a total of 51 feet, about 6 ft taller than the 4 existing buildings. Mr. Rabideau showed the elevations, noting the different roof treatment and varied facades. He acknowledged that this is a big building but felt it is in context with other large buildings. All setbacks are met. 3 Mr. Farrell. showed photos of the area. Ms. Kupe.rsmith was concerned with the elimination of a magnificent view. She felt the proposal Alooks like New Jersey,@ and didn=t like it so close to the Interstate. Mr. Rabideau said they share these concerns, but he felt that when landscaping grows, the building will not have the same impact. Mr. Bolton questioned Fire Dept. access at the corner. Mr. Farrell said the buildings are sprinklered. Ms. Quimby said sprinklers only offer protection until the Fire Dept. arrives, they don=t fight a fire. Mr. Belair said the Fire Chief will have to comment before there is an approval. Mr. Bolton was concerned with establishing a precedent here. Ms. Kupersmith felt this should be commercial space and indicated she would not support a height waiver. Mr. Kupferman said he is struggling with the change from mixed use to predominantly residential. Mr. Farrell said the city implemented new zoning and they.are complying with it. He felt it was good infill development. Mr. Boucher agreed with Mr. Kupferman. Mr. Belair noted a technical issue with height in that there is no average pre -construction grade provided. Mr_. Kupferman asked about the Farrell St. intersection. Mr. Farrell distributed a proposal for that. Mr. Belair noted the MPO has reviewed the 0 F DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 SEPTEMBER 2003 - 8 - proposal and it has gone to Bruce Hoar for a response. ® Members asked to see the proposed buildings superimposed on the photos. Mr. Bolton reiterated his feeling that the buildings are too close and too high. Mr. Ports then reviewed the landscaping plan. He stressed that it will take 10-20 years for the plan to develop, and then the site will have a different look. They will be planting austrian pines and also white birches. The birches grow 2 ft. a year. JMr. Belair informed the applicant that they will have to comply with new regulations for internal parking areas. 31 Members asked to invoke technical review for parking. iIMs. Quimby moved to impose technical review for parking .issues. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Skyett expressed concern that there will be children living in this area 15, and there is no place provided for them to play. She felt the applicant is stuffing people in and not providing for any quality of life for them. She felt this should be addressed while there is still a place to put something. lMs. Quimby then moved to continue the application to 4 November 2003. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. 'te Plan Application #SP-03-34 of Chittenden Solid Waste District amend a pre 'ously approved plan for a 5,355 sq. ft. hazardous waste col ction facility. The amendment consists of: 1) adding two 8'x40' met storage containers and 2) replacing three 1500 gallon storage tank with one 10,000 gallon tank d one 500 gallon tank, 1011 Airport Parkw and 9. Public Hearin Application #CU-03-15 of Chit den Solid Waste District to amend a previously proved plan for a 5,355 ft. hazardous waste collection facility. he amendment consi of adding two 81x40' metal storage containers, 101 Airport Parkw Mr. Barbagallo explained tXident is a minor modification. The storage containers were deleted by and they want to add them back in. They are also changing the sizeanks. With regard to the C' y Engineer=s r uest for drains for cleaning out the tank, CSWD wants t e tanks to drain fr the top, not the bottom as requested. Mr. Kupferma moved to approve Site Plan A lication #SP-03-34 and Application #CU-�dd� Chittenden Solid Waste District ubject to the stipulations as amenhe above discussion. Ms. Quimby s onded. Motion passed unanusly. Souti, Burlington Fire Depax4ment 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief October 31, 2003 Ms. Juli Beth Hoover, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: O'Dell Apartments, Eastwood Commons Farrell Street Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the O'Dell Apartments Eastwood Commons Building on Farrell Street. I have also made a site visit to try to envision the siting of this project. At this point the plans seem to be OK and I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Labor and Industry Fire Prevention Division codes and standards. 2. The building shall be provided with a full automatic sprinkler system. 3. Alarm system as required by Vermont Labor and Industry Fire Prevention Division. Fire Alarm panel and annunciator location to be specified by SBFD. 4. Prior to final approval, plans showing actual location of standpipes shall be submitted to SBFD for approval. 5. Elevator car(s) to be sized large enough to accommodate an ambulance stretcher in the flat position. 6. Provide an emergency key box, location to be specified by SBFD. 7. Number and location of fire hydrants to be determined by the South Burlington Water Department. Actual final spotting of said hydrants to be done jointly with SBFD. 8. Fire Department Sprinkler and Standpipe Connection location to be specified by SBFD. 9. Tree heights shall not block aerial ladder rescue access to upper floor windows and porches. Page — 2 O'Dell Apartments Eastwood Commons At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and Labor and Industry. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief Sout d Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief October 31, 2003 Ms. Juli Beth Hoover, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: O'Dell Apartments, Building 5 Farrell Street Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the O'Dell Apartments Building 5 on Farrell Street. I have also made a site visit to try to envision the siting of this project. At this point the plans seem to be OK and I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Labor and Industry Fire Prevention Division codes and standards. 2. The building and garage shall be provided with a full automatic sprinkler system. 3. Alarm system as required by Vermont Labor and Industry Fire Prevention Division. Fire Alarm panel and annunciator location to be specified by SBFD. 4. Prior to final approval, plans showing actual location of standpipes shall be submitted to SBFD for approval. 5. Elevator car(s) to be sized large enough to accommodate an ambulance stretcher in the flat position. 6. Provide an emergency key box, location to be specified by SBFD. 7. Number and location of fire hydrants to be determined by the South Burlington Water Department. Actual final spotting of said hydrants to be done jointly with SBFD. 8. Fire Department Sprinkler and Standpipe Connection location to be specified by SBFD. 9. Tree heights shall not block aerial ladder rescue access to upper floor windows and porches. Page — 2 O'Dell Apartments Building 5 At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and Labor and Industry. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. S' erely, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief F&M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-658-7400 fax 802-860-3594 Memo To: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington, Vermont From: Eric Farrell O t1 Dli Date: June 10, 2005 Re: Eastwood Commons - Certificate of Occupancy The Eastwood Commons building is constructed so as to be completed and occupied in two principal phases with Phase I consisting of the easterly wing of the building (along Eastwood Drive) and Phase 11 consisting of the westerly wing of the building (along Farrell Street). At this time, the following work is substantially complete: all site work; all landscaping (except for a few plantings on the west side of the curb cut, for which we ask your permission to wait a few weeks, until additional utility work in that area is completed to tie in the project -wide systems); the entire building exterior (except for touch-up painting on the Phase II wing; the parking garage; the main building entrances on the north and south elevations, the elevator lobbies on all floors; the common rooms on the first floor; two (of three) staircases; and 31 units on four floors. Phase II consists of the remaining 58 units on four floors. The Department of Labor & Industry has authorized the occupancy of Phase I, because we have met all of the life -safety conditions they required, as summarized in a letter from Mark Gilbert, Project Manager, Wright & Morrissey, Inc., to Joe Bernard, L&I, dated July 26, 2004 (copy enclosed). L&A also has agreed to authorize the occupancy of Phase 11, on a per floor basis, provided we meet certain additional conditions, those additional conditions having been summarized in an email message from Mark Gilbert to me dated February 28, 2005 (copy enclosed). I am writing to request that the City issue a Certificate of Occupancy for Phases I and II, in a manner consistent with L&I, so that we may begin to close on the sale of units and allow buyers to occupy when and as the building is completed. The first closing is scheduled for Monday, June 13th. Although the landscaping is substantially complete, we do ask for some flexibility in completing minor punch list items as weather permits. We have provided a bond for the full value ($62,000) of the landscaping plantings at Eastwood Commons, as you and I have previously discussed. I have also enclosed a plan of the building depicting the two phases. Enclosures Eastwood Commons Phase T) II Completion and Occupation ' Page I of 2 Eric Farrell From: Mark Gilbert [mgilbert@wmorrissey.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 1:51 PM To: Eric Farrell Cc: Paul Vest; John Gallagher; Joseph Benard; mvssi@aol.com; wlamberton@lambertonelectric.com Subject: Eastwood Commons Phase I & II Completion and Occupation Attachments: Memo to L&I 072604.doc Eric, Paul Vest and I met with Joe Benard today and discussed the activation of Phase I and Phase II. Joe said we can turn over space in Phase II as long as the following criteria are met in addition to those listed in my minutes of July 26, 2004 (attached): <<Memo to L&I 072604.doc>> 1. The floor being turned over must be 100% complete. 2. The fire alarm (include pull stations in construction area) and sprinkler must be 100% complete throughout the building. Joe said we can use heat detectors in corridors of areas still under construction to avoid setting the alarms off with construction dust. 3. Doors to all residential units in all areas still under construction must be installed and closed at the end of each work day. 4. All stairwells, egress routes and elevators must be complete. Stair C at the west end of the building (which will serve as construction access) must be maintained clear for emergency egress and fire doors must be kept closed. It is OK to post signs on the occupied floors stating stairwell for emergency use only. 5. Areas remaining under construction must be separated from the remainder of the floor with a 1 hour separation. Our schedule currently shows that we can have the fire alarm and sprinkler systems 100% throughout the building by the time we activate the 1 st phase. This means we will be able to turn over floors in Phase II as we complete them. The tentative schedule would look as follows: 4th floor — Phase II — 2-3 weeks after completion of Phase I 3rd floor - Phase II — 4-6 weeks after completion of Phase I 2"d floor - Phase 11 — 6-9 weeks after completion of Phase I 1 st floor — Phase II — 8-12 weeks after completion of Phase I mark Mark Gilbert 2/28/2005 WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC GENERAL CONTRACTORS July 26, 2004 99 Swift Street, Suite 100, S. Burlington, Vt. 05403 P. 802.863.4541 P.O. Box 421, Burlington, Vt. 05401 F. 802.865-1253 Vermont Department of Labor & Industry 372 Hurricane Lane Williston, VT 05495 Attention: Joe Bernard Regarding: Eastwood Commons South Burlington, Vermont Dear Joe, The following is a summary of my notes from our meeting on Tuesday, July 201h, 2004. Please review and let me know if you have any comments or corrections. Attendees: Joe Bernard, Vermont Department of Labor & Industry Paul Vest, Wright & Morrissey, Inc. Mark Gilbert, Wright & Morrissey, Inc. 1. The project phasing was reviewed. Joe approved the occupation of Phase I of the building while Phase II remained under construction as long as the following measures are in place: a. The one hour tenant fire separations must be extended across the corridor to isolate the construction area from the occupied area. This separation must be positioned so as not to create a non compliant "dead end" corridor (over 50') in the occupied portion of the building. Unit #'s 208, 213, 308, 313, 408 & 413 will need to be part of Phase II in order to meet this requirement. The separation will remain on column line #8 on the first floor where there is proper egress. b. The corridor separation must have a 45 minute rated assembly and swing away from the construction side to provide proper egress for construction workers. c. The sprinkler system will need to be activated throughout the building d. The fire alarm system will need to be 100% complete in the occupied area. Heat detection and pull stations will need to be in place in the area remaining under construction. 2. Joe requested that stand pipes be activated as soon as possible during construction and that the fire department be notified as soon as the stand pipes are on line. Thank you for your continued assistance with this project. Respectfully, Mark Gilbert Project manager Cc: Eric Farrell, FM Development Company, LLC Paul vest, Wright & Morrissey, Inc. CITY of SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT of PLANNING & ZONING F&M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC — PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-36 FINDINGS of FACT AND DECISION The F&M Development Corporation, herein referred to as the applicant, is requesting final plat approval to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of: 1) 283 residential units in six (6) buildings, 2) subdividing two (2) parcels of 24.458 acres into eight lots, 3) a 90,000 square foot building which will include 11,000 square feet of retail, a 150 seat, 7,500 square foot restaurant, 70,000 square feet of general office, 2,500 square foot drive -in -bank, and ten (10) residential units, 4) a 7,200 square foot addition to an indoor recreation facility, and 5) an existing 16,000 square foot television studio and office building. The amendment consists of: 1) a boundary line adjustment between lots #1 and #2, 2) increasing the number of residential units from 63 to 89 at 346 Farrell Street, 3) parking lot modifications, 4) substituting an approved square foot addition to an indoor recreation facility with two (2) additions off 0 450sq are feet and 1,980 square feet, and 5) making several other minor modifications to the project, Farrell Street. The South Burlington Development Review Board held a public hearing on June 1, 2004, which was continued until June 15, 2004, and then continued again until June 17, 2004. Eric Farrell represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following. - FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The F&M Development Corporation, herein referred to as the applicant, is requesting final plat approval to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of: 1) 283 residential units in six (6) buildings, 2) subdividing two (2) parcels of 24.458 acres into eight lots, 3) a 90,000 square foot building which will include 11,000 square feet of retail, a 150 seat, 7,500 square foot restaurant, 70,000 square feet of general office, 2,500 square foot drive -in -bank, and ten (10) residential units, 4) a 7,200 square foot addition to an indoor recreation facility, and 5) an existing 16,000 square foot television studio and office building. The amendment consists of: 1) a boundary line adjustment between lots #1 and #2, 2) increasing the number of residential units from 63 to 89 at 346 Farrell Street, 3) parking lot modifications, 4) substituting an approved 7,200 square foot addition to an indoor recreation facility with two (2) additions of 2,450 square feet and 1,980 square feet, and 5) making several other minor modifications to the project, Farrell Street. 2. The owners of record are EF Farrell, LLC and DB Morrissey, LLC. 3. The subject property contains 24.458 acres and is located in the Commercial 1 (Cl) District. F&M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-658-7400 fax 802-860-3594 Memo To: Brian Robertson From: Eric Farrell Date: 4/ 23/ 04 Re: O'Dell Parkway PUD - Amended Final Application I am pleased to provide you with the following information for your use in connection with our request to amend our Final Plat approval. • Application For Final Subdivision Plat Review • Application Fee in the amount of $125 fi35- Z-(o • Owners of Record / • Final Plat O'Dell Parkway PUD (Sheet 1)� • Overall Site Plan (C-3) �► �-t D ' • Eastwood Commons Grading + Drainage Plan (C-513) • Eastwood Commons Utilities Plan (C-7B) • Eastwood Commons Erosion Control Plan (C-913) • Landscape and Lighting Plan (N3) • Landscape & Lighting Details (N3.1) • Tree Relocation Plan • Eastwood Commons Elevations (A-9) • Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness Proposed Addition • Eastwood Commons - Impervious/Green Area Plan • Eastwood Commons Planting Schedule 1 • • Eastwood Commons - Site Lighting Fixture Specifications (6 pages) • Lot Coverage Summa�, • Parking SumrnarY • Traffic Impact Sun -unary Housekee in Before discussing our current re in connection with the lot covera e quest, a little bit of housekee g in our PUD. Two items need to be goneis necessary in First: Since the be representen ginnmg of our PUD, at the re g coverage's with and quest of the D 100% on its own lot).--d1Out the Ben Fr �' �'e have been Franklin building/lotThis no longer seems useful buildin is not technical) ,because even thou (which sits around it (they have deeded y Park of our PUD though the Ben coverage levels With Ben Franklin and circulation we °Wn all Of the 1 staff and/or anklin is the most a rights), so it would seem with Ben Fr file n. °bjects, going forward PPropriate. Therefore Franklin. , we will only present covera e nless the Second: g numbers --�_ Somewhere along began to understate g the way' our "building', « percent. file impact of the Ben Fr g and overall,, coverage levels Therefore, please be advised Franklin buildin coverage level -th Ben Fran g by 7/ 10th of one represented; and our that our curre (a " klin is actually 18.6% rather (approved) building" rather than "overall coverage level than the 17.9% the 55.3% previously represented. Ben Franklin Previously is actually 56.0% Our current and apologize for the err -or. Coverage Proposed coverage calculations g Summary are set forth in the attached Lot Toda 's Re uest The following is an outline of the modifications w • Lot 1 & e ask that the DRB consider: 2 -Adjust the bound to decrease by .20 acres to 7arY line between these two lots 2.203 acres. 439 acres and Lot , as follows: Lot 1 2 to increase by .20 acres to • Lot 1 -Delete 13 pa.�n total reduction of imperviousg spaces on Lot 1 area of 4,100 SF eluding circulation area, for a • Lot 2 - (no building changes). Increase the number of residential full 4th floor to the east units from footprint by of the building 63 to 89 by adding a to 114,200 SF 100 SF. Total building squa-r'footageand � iricreasin increase from 81 300 SF • g the building Lot 2 -Add an enclosed sin gle-story, 300 SF trash/recycling facility. • Page 2 1 • Lot 3 -Delete 4 parkin g spaces at the request of the Fire Department. Lot 8 - Delete the previ Sports & Fitness facility.ousl y approved 7,200 SF addition to the T • Lot8- �n Oaks Add two smaller additions to the Twin Oaks Sports the first addition being g 2,450 SF to house some new fitness &Fitness facility; spacious workout area for existin Present Membershipg fitness e equipment and a Physical training level; and the second equipment, all to serve the wining use, se addition being 1,980 SF for time, plus 2 employees. serving a m�mum of 4 to 8 members at any one • Lot 8 - Add to 0 deck,the attached tour overall coverage the south side Of ge c calculation, an existing 800 SF which has not been previously accounted for. Oaks Sports &Fitness facility, • Lot 8 - Expand the Of the previously approved surface parkin Twin Oaks Sports &Fitness facility from 11 to 3 g area at the west end Cov—= a spaces. As set forth in the attached total building Lot Coverage Sumrn 56.8 % (with Ben. Fri of 18.S�jo (with Ben Franklin' a da o request will result in �)• )and total overall coverage of Parking As set forth in the attached P Parking waiver from 65 arktng Summary, we re spaces (6.1 %) to 48 s quest a reduction T-raffc paces (4.5%). of our As set forth in reduction 4 the attached Traffic I 2 projected PM mxte Summary, this req uest results in a Water & Sewer Ca s for our entire acitproject. As indicated in previously )and y submitted materials the Department (water) the Burlington gton Public South Burlington Water there is sufficient Works proposed for the project. capacity to serve Department (sewer) the current combination have and i htin Landsca a uses LPlan N3 As set forth in the attached Proposing $38 400 . Eastwood Commons Plantin the area of Tin Oaks' expanded parkingmg' not including plantin s on we are believe thus far exceeds the Citys re lot' which I will submit on Lot 8, , in pment costs. quirement given Monday. I the $2.OM increase in Enclosures 0 Page 3 O'DELL PARKWAY PUD FARRELL STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON Documents for Recording (18x24 Mylar's) Approved Plans • Sheet 1 - Boundary Adjustment Between Lot 1 and Lot 2 O'Dell Parkway PUD • C-3 - Overall Site Plan • N3 - Lighting and Landscaping Plan • N5 - Twin Oaks Planting Plan • Sheet 1 - Boundary Adjustment Between Lot 1 and Lot 2 O'Dell Parkway PUD • C-3 - Overall Site Plan • C-513 - Eastwood Commons Grading & Drainage Plan • C-7B - Eastwood Commons Utilities Plan • C-9B - Eastwood Commons Erosion Control Plan • N3 - Lighting and Landscaping Plan • N3.1 - Landscaping and Lighting Details • N3.2 - Landscaping and Lighting Details • N5 - Twin Oaks Planting Plan • A-9 - Eastwood Commons Elevations • A-11 - Eastwood Commons West Elevation • Wiemann Lamphere - Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness Proposed Addition WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC GENERAL CONTRACTORS July 26, 2004 99 Swift Street, Suite 100, S. Burlington, Vt. 05403 P. 802.863.4541 P.O. Box 421, Burlington, Vt. 05401 F. 802.865-1253 Vermont Department of Labor & Industry 372 Hurricane Lane Williston, VT 05495 Attention: Joe Bernard Regarding: Eastwood Commons South Burlington, Vermont Dear Joe, Respectfully submitted, The following is a summary of my notes from our meeting on Tuesday, July 20t', 2004. Please review and let me know if you have any comments or corrections. Attendees: Joe Bernard, Vermont Department of Labor & Industry Paul Vest, Wright & Morrissey, Inc. Mark Gilbert, Wright & Morrissey, Inc. 1. The project phasing was reviewed. Joe approved the occupation of Phase I of the building while Phase II remained under construction as long as the following measures are in place: a. The one hour tenant fire separations must be extended across the corridor to isolate the construction area from the occupied area. This separation must be positioned so as not to create a non compliant "dead end" corridor (over 50') in the occupied portion of the building. Unit #'s 208, 213, 308, 313, 408 & 413 will need to be part of Phase II in order to meet this requirement. The separation will remain on column line #8 on the first floor where there is proper egress. b. The corridor separation must have a 45 minute rated assembly and swing away from the construction side to provide proper egress for construction workers. c. The sprinkler system will need to be activated throughout the building ?45L 'L ('t MONZN ." 2ND, 3RD, 4TH FLOOR IL91 11a.. _C A202b =J KEY PLAN N0 - ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE 8 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - SEE SHEETS A-600, A-601, A-602 FOR INTERIOR UNIT PARTITION TYPES LBO= DETAIL OR ENLARGEMENT REFERENCE 0---M0 PILE NO SECTION — PACE REFERENCE ELEVATION REFERENCE Ho PAGE SECTION DETAIL REFERENCE PACE MNAE UNIT TYPE AND NUMBER WALL TYPE DOOR TYPE N0. WINDOW TYPE O FROM AXIS TO AXIS OR OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD T y a5¢R A ulyjj aa,*eeg�p'�' 9 ©F.. ISSUED FOR PERMIT ONLY 4.27.2004 Architecture Interiors Fleeorte Lemay+Youkel 4001, nw Saint -Antoine West Monbfol, 046bm H4C 109 210, College Street Suite 300 01nglm, Vermont 05401, USA TEI6pme: 511 932-07 Tiftpieer. 514 935-8137 10-A : m Wray-0el.— PROR CT: EASTWOOD COMMONS South Burlington WL. 1ST FLOOR =j KEY PLAN NOTE: - ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE 8 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - SEE SHEETS A-600, A-601, A-602 FOR INTERIOR UNIT PARTITION TYPES LEGEND DETAIL OR ENLARGEMENT REFERENCE (a@ NO SECTION — PAGE REFERENCE ELEVATION REFERENCE PAGE SECTION DETAIL REFERENCE PAGE .E UNIT TYPE AND NUMBER INUMBER WALL TYPE __O DOOR TYPE N0. WINDOW TYPE O FROM AXIS TO AXIS OR T OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD � 5�0 AFR? YOU gT�QF.VER ISSUED FOR PERMIT ONLY 4.27.2004 Architecture Intertore Resorts Lemay+Youkel 4001, rue Saint -Antoine Ount Montr€ol, Oudbea HK 189 210. College Sheet Suite 300 Burluglon, Vermont OWI. USA TBEphee: (514) 932-6697 T8lkopeur. 514) 935-8137 Internet : w kmay-youkel.aom PROTECT: EASTWOOD COMMONS south Burlington F&M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-658-7400 fax 802-860-3594 Memo To: Mr. Timothy Eustace, Esq., City Attorney Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington, Vermont From: Eric Farrell Date: St. Patrick's Day, 2005 CC: Ms. Mary Huttenlock, Doremus & Kantor Re: Bacon Street Attached please find a self-explanatory Project Review Sheet issued by Peter Keibel, District Coordinator, on 314/05, which indicates that no further permits are required for the City to accept ownership of Bacon Street. Also, it is my understanding that this was the final requirement before the City would accept the deeds to Farrell Street (extension) and Bacon Street, completing the transfer of ownership and responsibility for these improvements. Please confirm that my understanding is correct and when the actual transfer will take place. Attachment 1 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES (ANR) AND NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD http://www.anr.state.vt.us/declead/pa/index.htm / http://www.nrb.state.vt.us/ PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOTAL # DEC PERMITS _ PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW AR RESPONSE DATE PENDING APPLICATION #vU.? DISTRICT 4 MUNICIPALITY South Burlington PIN # OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: NAME: F&M Development Co NAME: Eric Farrell, F&M Development Co. ADDRESS: ADDRESS: P.O. Box 421 Burlington, VT 05402 TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE: 802-863-4541 Project Name: Based on a written request from Erik Farrell received on March 8, 2005 a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of >10 acres, located off Route 7 . The project is generally described as: Transfer of Bacon Street to the City of South Burlington Prior Permits From This Office: 4C1071 (and amendments) WW-4-1503 (and amendments), WW-4-1450 (and amendments) PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION [ ] I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coordinator or Assistant District Coordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A.. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---------------- ❑ Landowner/Agent, ❑ ANR Permit Specialist, ❑ Other Person 1. ACT 250: THIS IS AJURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LANDOWNERIAGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. Chapter 220). (#47)** Project: ® Commercial M Residential ❑ Municipal project Has the landowner subdivided before? ❑ When/where: # of lots: AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: ❑ YES ® NO Copies sent to Statutory Parties: ❑ YES M NO BASIS FOR DECISION: The boundary adjustment that created the "road lot" called Beacon Street, was approved in LUP #4C1071 R-1. The conveyance to the City of South Burlington is a non -material change to an existing permit and does not require a permit amendment. There are no other permits amendments required for the project (as well as 4C1070R), however several conditions of #4C1071 R have been or may be triggered soon - specifically Condition #20, #27, #28 and #29. SIGNATURE: DATE: ADDRESS: Environmental Commissions Districts #4, 6, & 9 Peter Keibel, District Nordinator Telephone: (802)879-5658 111 West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 2. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED YES NO ❑ Wastewater System & Potable Water Supply Permit (#1 & #2) ❑ Notice of Permit Requirements (deferral language) (#2) ❑ Floor Drains (#1 & #2) ❑ Campgrpunds (#3) ❑ Extension of sewer lines (#5) REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: SIGNATURE: 11 El Environment![ Add stance Division, ❑ Wastewater Management Division DATE: ADDRESS: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Permit Specialist Telephone: (802)879-5676 DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Telephone: (802)879-5656 111 WEST STREET, ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452 OVER»»»»»» ** NOTE: NUMBERS IN PARENTHESIS (#) REFER TO PERMIT INFORMATION SHEETS IN THE VERMONT PERMIT HANDBOOK http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/permit hb/index.htm THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PERMITS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact: ❑ Discharge permit; pretreatment; industrial, municipal (#7.1, 7.2, & 8) ❑ Underground Injection Control (UIC)(#9 & #9.1) ❑ Residuals management (#10) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888 520-4879) Contact: ❑ Construction/modification of source (#14) ❑ Open Burning (#18) ❑ Wood Chip Burners (?90HP) (#14) ❑ Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation (#14)) El Industrial Process Air Emissions (#14) ❑ Diesel Engines (> 200 bHP) (#14) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400)(800 $23-6500 in VT) Contact: ❑ New Hydrants (#22) ❑>500' of waterline construction(#22) ❑ Community Water System (CWS) ❑ Bottled Water (#20) ❑Operating permit (#21) ❑ Transient Non -Community Water System (TNC) (#21) ❑ Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water system (NTNC) (#21) 6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Stormwater Permits (Hotline 802-241-4320) (#6 - #6.5) Contact: Contact: Stephanie Lanphear (802-241-4320) ❑ River Management (241-3770) ❑ Ponds (#32.1) ❑ Construction General Permit >1 AC of disturbance (#6.1) Shoreland Encroachment (241-3777) Steve Hanna (#28) Wetlands (241-3770) (#29) ❑ Stormwater from new development or redevelopment sites (6.2 & 6.3) ❑ multi -Sector General Permit (MSGP) industrial activities with SIC codes (#6.4) Stream Alteration/ Section 401 Water Quality Certificate / Stream Crossing structures (751-0129/879-5631/786-5906) (27 & #32) WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hazardous Waste Handler site ID(241-3888) (#36) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444) (#37, #39, #40) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) #41 & #44) Waste oil burning (241-3888) ❑ Waste Transporter permit (#35) FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: ❑ Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) (#33) ❑ Asbestos Disposal(241-3444) ❑ Composting Facilities (241-3444) (#43) ❑ Used septic system components/stone (#44) Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) (#45) State funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) (#46) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS AND MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: Judy Mirro Jo n Daly RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Contact: ❑ Nongame & Natural Heritage Program (Threatened & Endangered Species)(#47.4) ❑ Stream Obstruction Approval (#47.5) DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office Contact: Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) (#49, #50, #50.1, #50.2) Storage of flammable liquids, explosives ❑ LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers (#50.2) ❑ Boilers and pressure vessels (#50.3) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors (#51, #51.1, #52, #53, #53.1) ❑ Program for asbestos control & lead certification (#54, #55, #55.1) Children's camps ❑ Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial (#51.1) AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: Child care facilities (800 649-2642 or 802-241-2159)(#57)) ❑ Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) (#59) Nursing Homes (241-2345) (#59) ❑ Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) #59) AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) (#66) ❑ Junkyards (828-2053) (#62) Signs (Travel Information Council), (828-2651) (#63) ❑ Railroad crossings (828-2710) (#65) Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) (#61) ❑ Airports and landing strips (828-2833) (#68) Construction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) (#66) DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800-675-9873) Contact: Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) (#72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78) ❑ Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) (#81) Milk processing facilities (828-2433) (83, #83.1, #85, #87) ❑ Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-2421) (#89, #89.1) ❑ Golf courses (828-2431) (#71) ❑ Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) (#88) ❑ Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) (#79) ❑ Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) (#75.1, #80). 16. VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 ❑ VT Building Energy Standards (#47.2) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) ❑ Historic Buildings (#47.1 & #101) ❑ Archeological sites (#47.1 & #101) 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) ❑ Liquor licenses (#90) ❑ General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) ❑ Business registration (#90.1) ❑ Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) (#90.2) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) ❑ Income & business taxes (sales, meals/rooms, etc) (#91, #92, #93, #94, #95, #96) 21, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) ❑ Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle(#69 - #70) :22. `LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,8 Carmichael Street, Ste. 205, Essex Jct, VT 05452 (802)872-2893 (97, #98, & #99) 24. OTHER: Sections #3-#24 above have been completed y Permit Specialist: Jeff McMahon ate: I maybe reached at 802-879-5676 Copies have been mailed to: REVISED 2/054. IBO�-, 485 Ms. dull Beth Hinds City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re. City's Edge Property Flood Insurance Mapping Dear Juli Beth: R' February 3, 2005 "Le'lT The Burlington Community Land Trust is in the process of updating the Flood Insurance Mapping for the City's Edge property off Farrell Street in South Burlington. As you are aware, the construction of the interstate (1-189) modified the drainage patterns in the Farrell Street area. However, the FIRM maps continue to show the City's Edge property in a flood zone. Therefore, we will be submitting a LOMR-F Application to FEMA to remove the flood zone from the map. I have enclosed a Community Acknowledgment Form that is required as part of the submittal which has to be completed by a community official in the City of South Burlington. If you should have any questions or wish to discuss this procedure in further detail, please let me know. We certainly appreciate your assistance on this process. -1 Stephen A. `Mock, P.E. SAV:pao Enclosures FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY COMMUNITY ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM 0-11KB. NO. 3067-0147 Expires. September 30, 2005 PAPERWORK BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 0.88 hour per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing, reviewing, and submitting the form. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless a valid OMB control number appears in the upper right comer of this form. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collections Management, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington DC 20472, Paperwork Reduction Project (3067-0147). Submission of the form is required to obtain or retain benefits under the National Flood Insurance Program. Please do not send your completed survey to the above address. This form must be completed for requests involving the existing or proposed placement of fill (complete Section A) OR to provide acknowledgment of this request to remove a property from the SFHA which was previously located within the regulatory floodway (complete Section B). This form must be completed and signed by the official responsible for floodplain management in the community. The community number and the subject property address must appear in the spaces provided below. Community Number: Property Name or Address: A REQUESTS INVOLVING THE PLACEMENT OF FILL As the community official responsible for floodplain management, I hereby acknowledge that we have received and reviewed this Letter of Map Revision Based on Fill (LOMR-F) or Conditional LOMR-F request. Based upon the oommunity's review, we find the completed or proposed project meets or Is designed to meet all of the community floodplain management requirements, including the requirement that no fill be placed in the regulatory floodway, and that all necessary Federal, State, and local permits have been, or in the case of a Conditional LOMR-F, will be obtained. In addition, we have determined that the land and any existing or proposed structures to be removed from the SFHA are or will be reasonably safe from flooding as defined in 44CFR 65.2(c), and that we have available upon request by FEMA, all analyses and documentation used to make this determination. For LOMR-F requests, we understand that this request is being forwarded to FEMA for a possible map revision. Community Comments: Community Official's Name and Title: (Please Print or Type) l �1 rDR F I�JAJI/u( j 1 �l tr Te phone No.: 6� 6, f t a BCD Community Name: Community Official's Signature: (required) Date: %jay OF .: OU 10ke-LVJ(r---Mi4 I B. PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE REGULATORY F' 'QODWAY As the community official responsible for floodplain management, I hereby acknowledge that we have received and reviewed this request for a LOMA We understand that this request is being forwrarded to FEMA to determine if this property has been inadvertently included in the regulatory floodway. We acknowledge that no fill on this property has been or will be placed within the designated regulatory floodway. We find that the completed or proposed project meets or is designed to meet all of the community floodplain management requirements. Community Comments: Community Official's Name and Title: (Please Print or Type) Telephone No.: Community Name: Community Official's Signature (required): Date: FEMA Form 81-87B, SEP 02 Community Acknowledgment Form UT-1 Form 3 Page 11 of 1 e I,5 _,Wu RUUA � UP Acres " l-W 611� 24.422 Base density 15 Total units 366 Affordable bonus 0.25 Total density 457 Affordable requirement 46 Affordable built 191 Affordable still required for maximum bonus -145 Total Buildable 457 Less Lot 3 units 160 Less City's Edge units 60 Less Eastwood Commons units 89 Remaning buildable units 148 F&M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-658-7400 fax 802-860-3594` A To: Juli Beth Hinds, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning South Burlington, Vermont From: Eric Farrell Date: March 26, 2005 Re: O'Dell Parkway PUD - Overall Project Density We are planning the final build out of our project, so I am writing to confirm my understanding of the maximum residential density that is allowable within our project. I know I confirmed this with you, Ray and Brian back in November 2003, and reconfirmed it with you after your lengthy conversation with the Planning Commission on the matter a few days later, but, being the paranoid developer that I am, I thought it would be a good idea to run through the numbers once again, before we come back in with a Final Plat Amendments. This is my understanding: • Our project site comprises 24.422 acres, which times 15 units per acre, equals 366 units of base zoning density. • We subtract out the 160 units that were already constructed on Lot 3 (for Lake Champlain Housing) before the ordinance change, leaving 206 units of base zoning density ramaining. • Per Article 13.14 C (2),206 units x 25% = 51 "bonus" units of which 50% must be affordable. • Since City's Edge Condominiums contains 31 perpetually affordable units, we qualify for the full bonus, for a maximum of 257 units (206 + 51). • We have since constructed 60 units at City's Edge (Lot 4) and are constructing 89 units at Eastwood Commons (Lot 2), leaving 108 units of total density available. Please let me know, if you figure it differently. Meanwhile, we have been working diligently to understand and respond to the changing patterns of market demand for our location. One very noticeable sentiment that has emerged since we broke ground four years ago; is that with all of the nearby services and easy access, including to public transportation, it's just a great place to live, work and recreate. In response to those sentiments and resulting demand, we are formulating final proposed amendments to our plan that will likely include the following mix of uses on Lot 1, which will be subdivided into several smaller lots to accommodate different ownership patterns: • Up to 72 units of senior housing • 15,000 sf of general office and function/ support space associated with the senior housing • Redevelopment of the TV Station facility (15,000 so into medical office and/or health/fitness related space • Retention of the TV tower servicing existing wireless customers (no more TV) • 71 residential condominium units to be called Eastwood Commons H • 37 residential condominium units - yet to be named If we implement all of the uses, as set forth above, then the following uses that are currently approved will no longer be part of our mix: • Retail (17,000 so • 80 Seat Restaurant (4,000 so • General office (70,000 so The good news for the abutting neighborhoods is that these combined changes will serve to reduce our total external trip ends by more than 50% from the combination of uses that are currently constructed and approved for our project. Please call me at your convenience. Warmest Regards. 0 Page 2 Page 1 of 2 Date: April 18, 2005 Case No.: 05-01-0372A LOMR-F Federal Emergency Management Agency x �w Washington, D.C. 20472 LAND 5 LETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) COMMUNITY AND MAP PANEL INFORMATION LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, Lot 4, O'Dell Parkway PUD, as shown on the Plat, recorded in Volume 4-15, COMMUNITY CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT Page 93, in the Office of the City Clerk, South Burlington, Vermont COMMUNITY NO.: 500195 NUMBER: 5001950005B AFFECTED NAME: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, MAP PANEL CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT DATE: 3/16/1981 FLOODING SOURCE: POTASH BROOK APPROXIMATE LATITUDE & LONGITUDE OF PROPERTY: 44,449, -73206 SOURCE OF LAT & LONG: PRECISION MAPPING STREETS 7.0 DATUM: NAD 83 DETERMINATION OUTCOME 1% ANNUAL LOWEST LOWEST WHAT IS CHANCE ADJACENT LOT LOT BLOCK/ SUBDIVISION STREET REM V D FLOO FLOOD DE ELEVATION SECTION FRO(NGVD ZONED ELE ELEVATION 29) SFHA (NGVD 29) (NGVD 29) 4 O'Dell Parkway _ Property PUD C 200.6 feet 207.8 feet 204.5 feet Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) - The SFHA is an area that would be inundated bythe flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given yea r (ba se fl ood). ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS (Please refer to the appropriate section on Attachment 1 for the additional considerations listed below.) ZONE A This document provides the Federal Emergency Management Agency's determination regarding a request for a Letter of Map Revision based on Fill for the property described above. Using the information submitted and the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map, we have determined that the property(ies) is/are not located in the SFHA, an area inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood). This document revises the effective NFIP map to remove the subject property from the SFHA located on the effective NFIP map; therefore, the Federal mandatory flood insurance requirement does not apply. However, the lender has the option to continue the flood insurance requirement to protect its financial risk on the loan. A Preferred Risk Policy (PRP) is available for buildings located outside the SFHA. Information about the PRP and how one can apply is enclosed. This determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22304-6439. Doug Bellomo, P.E., CFM, Chief Hazard Identification Section, Mitigation Division Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate Version 1.3.3 1029299.1 LOMR-F-SL01###0372 Page 2 of 2 I (Date: April 18, 2005 [Case No.: 05-01-0372A I LOMR-F Federal Emergency Management Agency Nn sEcWashington, D.C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) ATTACHMENT 1 (ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS) ZONE A (This Additional Consideration applies to the preceding 1 Property.) The National Flood Insurance Program map affecting this property depicts a Special Flood Hazard Area that was determined using the best flood hazard data available to FEMA, but without performing a detailed engineering analysis. The flood elevation used to make this determination is based on approximate methods and has not been formalized through the standard process for establishing base flood elevations published in the Flood Insurance Study. This flood elevation is subject to change. This attachment provides additional information regarding this request. If you have any questions about this attachment, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22304-6439. Doug Bellomo, P.E., CFM, Chief Hazard Identification Section, Mitigation Division Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate Version 1.3.3 1029299.1 LOMR-F-SL01###0372 Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 FLgND SEGO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LETTERS OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL When making determinations on requests for Letters of Map Revision based on the placement of fill (LOMR- Fs), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) bases its determination on the flood hazard information available at the time of the determination. Requesters should be aware that flood conditions may change or new information may be generated that would supersede FEMA's determination.. When necessary, FEMA will inform the community about superseded determinations by letter. Requesters also should be aware that removal of a property (parcel of land or structure) from the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) means FEMA has determined the property is not subject to inundation by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood). This does not mean the property is not subject to other flood hazards. The property could be inundated by a flood with a magnitude greater than the base flood or by localized flooding not shown on the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map. The effect of a LOMR-F is it removes the Federal requirement for the lender to require flood insurance coverage for the property described. The LOMR-F is not a waiver of the condition that the property owner maintain flood insurance coverage for the property. Only the lender can waive the flood insurance purchase requirement because the lender imposed the requirement. The property owner must request and receive a written waiver from the lender before canceling the policy. The lender may determine, on its own as a business decision, that it wishes to continue the flood insurance requirement to protect its financial risk on the loan. The LOMR-F provides FEMA's comment on the mandatory flood insurance requirements of the NFIP as they apply to a particular property. A LOMR-F is not a building permit, nor should it be construed as such. Any development, new construction, or substantial improvement of a property impacted by a LOMR-F must comply with all applicable State and local criteria and other Federal criteria. If a lender releases a property owner from the flood insurance requirement, and the property owner decides to cancel the policy and seek a refund, the NFIP will refund the premium paid for the current policy year, provided that no claim is pending or has been paid on the policy during the current policy year. The property owner must provide a written waiver of the insurance requirement from the lender to the property insurance agent or company servicing his or her policy. The agent or company will then process the refund request. Even though structures are not located in an SFHA, as mentioned above, they could be flooded by a flooding event with a greater magnitude than the base flood. In fact, more than 25 percent of all claims paid by the NFIP are for policies for structures located outside the SFHA in Zones B, C, X (shaded), or X (unshaded). More than one-fourth of all policies purchased under the NFIP protect structures located in these zones. The risk to structures located outside SFHAs is just not as great as the risk to structures located in SFHAs. Finally, approximately 90 percent of all federally declared disasters are caused by flooding, and homeowners insurance does not provide financial protection from this flooding. Therefore, FEMA encourages the widest possible coverage under the NFIP. LOMRFENC-1 08/06/04 The NEW offers two types of flood insurance policies to property owners: the low-cost Preferred Risk Policy (PRP) and the Standard Flood Insurance Policy (SFIP). The PRP is available for 1- to 4-family residential structures located outside the SFHA with little or no loss history. The PRP is available for townhouse/rowhouse-type structures, but is not available for other types of condominium units. The SFIP is available for all other structures. Additional information on the PRP and how a property owner can qualify for this type of policy may be obtained by calling the Flood Insurance Information Hotline, toll free, at 1-800427- 4661. Before making a final decision about flood insurance coverage, FEMA strongly encourages property owners to discuss their individual flood risk situations and insurance needs with an insurance agent or company. The revisions made effective by a LOMR-F are made pursuant to Section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (Title XIII of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, P.L. 90-448) 42 U.S.C. 4001-4128, and 44 CFR Part 65. In accordance with regulations adopted by the community when it made application to join the NFIP, letters issued to revise an NFIP map must be attached to the community's official record copy of the map. That map is available for public inspection at the community's official map repository. Therefore, FEMA sends copies of all such letters to the affected community's official map repository. To ensure continued eligibility to participate in the NFIP, the community must enforce its floodplain management regulations using, at a minimum, the flood elevations and zone designations shown on the NFIP map, including the revisions made effective by LOMR-Fs. LOMR-Fs are based on minimum criteria established by the NFIR State, county, and community officials, based on knowledge of local conditions and in the interest of safety, may set higher standards for construction in the SFHA. If the State, county, or community has adopted more restrictive and comprehensive floodplain management criteria, these criteria take precedence over the minimum Federal criteria. FEMA does not print and distribute LOMR-Fs to primary map users, such as local insurance agents and mortgage lenders; therefore, the community serves as the repository for LOMR-Fs. FEMA encourages communities to disseminate LOMR-Fs so that interested persons, such as property owners, insurance agents, and mortgage lenders, may benefit from the information. FEMA also encourages communities to prepare articles for publication in the local newspaper that describe the changes made and the assistance community officials will provide in serving as a clearinghouse for LOMR-Fs and interpreting NFIP maps. When a restudy is undertaken, or when a sufficient number of revisions occur on particular map panels, FEMA initiates the printing, avid dist ibut'Ion process for the panels and 'Incorporates the changes :Wade effective by LOMR-Fs. FEMA notifies community officials in writing when affected map panels are being physically revised and distributed. If the results of particular LOMR-Fs cannot be reflected on the new map panels because of scale limitations, FEMA notifies the community in writing and revalidates the LOMR-Fs in that letter. LOMR-Fs revalidated in this way usually will become effective 1 day after the effective date of the revised map. L.OMRFENG I 08/06/04 7, Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 MR. CHUCK HAFTER CITY MANAGER, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403- DEAR MR. HAFTER: April 18, 2005 CASE NO.: 05-01-0372A COMMUNITY: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT COMMUNITY NO.: 500195 This is in refcxence to a request that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) determine if the property described in the enclosed document is located within an identified Special Flood Hazard Area, the area that would be inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood), on the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map. Using the information submitted and the effective NFIP map, our determination is shown on the attached Letter of Map Revision based on Fill (LOMR-F) Determination Document. This determination document provides additional information regarding the effective NFIP map, the legal description of the property and our determination. Additional documents are enclosed which provide information regarding the subject property and LOMR-Fs. Please see the List of Enclosures below to determine which documents are enclosed. Other attachments specific to this request may be included as referenced in the Determination/Comment document. If you have any questions about this letter or any of the enclosures, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22304-6439. Sincerely, Doug Bellomo, P.E., CFM, Chief Hazard Identification Section, Mitigation Division Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate LIST OF ENCLOSURES: LOMR F DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) cc: State/Commonwealth NFIP Coordinator Community Map Repository Region Mr. Stephen A. Vock, P.E. Ms. Amy Demetrowitz F&M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 802-863-4541 fax 802-865-1253 105 MWi l 7 To: Peter Keibel, District Coordinator Environmental Commission District #4 From: Eric Farrell Sy�� Date: March 7, 2005 Re: Land Use Permit #4C1071R-1 I am writing to request a clarification of the record regarding the permitting status of the public street known as "Bacon Street', in South Burlington. A deed to the street has been tendered to the City, but before acceptance, Mr. Timothy Eustace, Esq., Attorney for the City of South Burlington, has asked for confirmation that the subdivision of that parcel has the required state permits. When the O'Dell Parkway PUD project was originally approved by the City on September 19, 2000, condition #21 (page 9) of the Findings of Fact and Decision (copy enclosed) required the deeding of the street to the City. The stated requirement to upgrade the street to City standards was subsequently waived by the City Engineer. The O'Dell Parkway PUD project is covered under two separate Land Use Permits (4C1070R- 2 and 40071R-1), which have combined Findings; and two Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permits, numbers WW-4-1503-2 and WW-4-1450-1 (copies enclosed). Bacon Street is covered under Land Use Permit 4C1071R-1 and is depicted as a 0.241 acre parcel of land on the latest O'Dell Parkway PUD subdivision plat entitled "Boundary Adjustment Between Lot 1 and Lot 2 O'Dell Parkway PUD", dated April 23, 2004, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. (copy enclosed), which plan was stamped "Approved" by the Department of Environmental Conservation on 6/25/04, in connection with the issuance of "Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit" number WW-4-1503-2. Bacon Street is also depicted on a plan entitled "Overall Site Plan', dated 11/18/99, last revised on 4/20/04, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. (copy enclosed), which plan was also stamped "Approved" by the Department of Environmental Conservation on 6/25/04, in connection with the issuance of "Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit" number W W-4-1503-2. Bacon Street is also depicted on a plan entitled "Overall Site Plan", dated 11/18/99, last revised on 12/1/03, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. (copy enclosed), which plan was also stamped "Approved" by the Department of Environmental Conservation on 1/8/04, in connection with the issuance of "Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit" number W W-4-1450-1. Our request is that you provide written confirmation that Land Use Permit number 40071R-1 does, in fact, allow for Bacon Street to be deeded to the City. Alternatively, if you believe further permit action is required, then we ask that you please process an "administrative amendment" to that permit, at your earliest convenience. Please let me know if you require any additional information or clarification. CC: Mr. Timothy Eustace, Esq., City Attorney Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator Ms. Mary Huttenlock, Doremus & Kantor, Attorneys (without attachments) Enclosures 0 Page 2 7-J l_&o #SD-00-43 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNT_ Y OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, final plat application of Wright & Morrissey Realty Company for a mixed use planned unit development consisting: 1) an 95 room hotel, 2) 160 residential units in four (4) buildings, 3) a 130 unit congregate housing facility, 4) subdividing two (2) parcels of 24.458 acres into eight (8) lots, 5) a 91,000 square foot building which will include 11,000 sq. ft. of retail, a 150 seat 7,500 sq. ft. restaurant, 70,000 sq. ft. of general office, 2,500 sq. ft. of drive-in bank, and ten (10) residential units, 6) a 7200 square foot addition to an indoor recreational facility, and 7) an existing 16,000 sq. ft. television studio and office building, 65 Farrell Street. On the 5th of September, 2000, the South Burlington Development Review Board approved the final plat application of Wright & Morrissey Realty Company under Section 204 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations based on the following findings: This project consists of a mixed use planned unit development consisting: 1) an 95 room hotel, 2) 160 residential units in four (4) buildings, 3) a 130 unit congregate housing facility, 4) subdividing two (2) parcels of 24.458 acres into eight (8) lots, 5) a 91,000 square foot building which will include 11,000 sq. ft. of retail, a 150 seat 7,500 sq. ft. restaurant, 70,000 sq. ft. of general office, 2,500 sq. ft. of drive-in bank, and ten (10) residential units, 6) a 7200 square foot addition to an indoor recreational facility, and 7) an existing 16,000 sq. ft. television studio and office building. 2. This property located on Shelburne Road and Farrell Street lies within the Cl, C2 and Floodplain Overlay Districts. It is bounded on the north by residences and a service station, on the east by Farrell Street, on the south by I-189 and on the west by Mall 189 and Shelburne Road. The applicant was requested to revise the plans to illustrate the Residential and Conservation Open Space Districts. 3. Access/circulation: Access will be provided by a proposed City street, Farrell Street (formerly O'Dell Parkway), which will connect Shelburne Road with Farrell Street. The applicant has proposed that the existing northern leg of Farrell Street that runs from the eastern terminus of Hadley Road to a "T" intersection with the extension of Farrell Street and renamed. Driveways are proposed off from this street to serve the various buildings. A driveway is proposed on Farrell Street to serve two (2) of the residential buildings. An existing driveway on Farrell Street serving the indoor recreational facility will not change. Staff recommended a pedestrian connection (i.e., sidewalk or recreation path) to connect this development with the residential neighborhood between the Kochman and Johnson properties. The applicant has submitted comments regarding this proposal. Providing this pedestrian connection would further the following recommendations contained in the Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan: "Pedestrian links are needed beMeen neighborhoods, schools, parks, shopping and employment centers, other transportation modes, and other community focal points. In order to promote such links as transportation facilities, pedestrian ways generally should follow direct travel routes whenever possible, rather than paralleling roadways." Recommendations of the Transportation Chapter: 1(b)(2) "...walkways, both within and outside the street rights -of -way, to link various neighborhood and community focal points" 1(c) "Sidewalks and/or walkways should be required where it is appropriate during site plan and subdivision review." 1(e) "The city should encourage mixed -use development to promote pedestrian movement and less reliance on automobiles for local circulation." Circulation on the site is adequate. 4. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 17%, with Ben Franklin it is 18% (maximum allowed for commercial is 30% and for residential is 20%). Overall coverage is 55%, with Ben Franklin it is 56% (maximum allowed for commercial is 70% and for residential is 40%). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is 27% (30% max). Along Farrell Street it is 14% (30% max). South of O'Dell Parkway (the Farrell Street extension) front yard coverage is 23% (30% max). North of O'Dell Parkway front yard coverage will be exceeded at 64% (30% max). Staff recommended removing the parking between the street and the building to improve compliance with the front yard coverage requirements. It has been the Development Review Board's unwritten policy of using the residential coverage's for mixed use developments. The applicant requested that the policy be amended to allow the greater overall coverage. This use was approved by the Development Review Board at preliminary plat. Staff supported this because it encourages mixed use development. Setback requirements are now met for the addition to Twin Oaks Fitness Center. The southerly residential building does not meet the 40 foot front yard setback requirement from Farrell Street and the northeasterly residential building does not meet the 40 ft. front setback requirement from O'Dell Parkway. The Development Review Board may modify these setback requirements under Section 12.406 (b) of the zoning regulations. Additional setback requirements required for the height waiver are also not met (see discussion on building height). 5. Parking --A total of 1078 spaces are required (including the 90 for Ben Franklin) and 1006 spaces (341 covered spaces) including 19 handicapped spaces and 30 bicycle stalls are being provided. The applicant reduced the overall parking at the request of the Development Review Board. The applicant requested a 72 space or 6.7% parking waiver. Bike racks are depicted on the plans. 2 6. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $132,875 which is being met. Staff recommended that parking be eliminated and more green space be placed in front of the mixed retail/office building. This design change would result in more green space along the street and bring the project closer to compliance with the front yard coverage limitation. In addition, this type of development pattern would better connect the building to the public street and better connect the two sides of the development. 7. C.O. District: There is a C.O. District along the I-189 no.w. The preliminary plat approval required that the applicant remove all encroachments in the C.O. District not along the Interstate Ramp. The proposed encroachments are a five (5) ft. wide gravel recreation path along the interstate, and a comer of a basketball court. Staff requested that the applicant depict the Interstate ramp area of the C.O. District on the plans to ensure that the proposed encroachments are within the ramp area. Section 3.505 of the zoning regulations allows the Board to approve encroachment along an interstate ramp if it is in compliance with the following criteria: (a) Area of encroachment is located no less than 50 feet from the interstate right-of-way. (b) Area of encroachment is sufficiently screened from view from the Interstate and ramps due to: (i) existing topography and/or existing vegetation, and/or (ii) proposed landscaping, which may also include berming. No encroachments are permitted along the Interstate outside of the ramp area. The applicant should submit finished contours to ensure that filling and re -grading do not occur within the C.O. District. 8. Traffic: A traffic impact study was prepared. The study indicates that "vehicular movement on the local roadway operates in compliance with the policy. set forth in the City of South Burlington Zoning Ordinance—LOS D or better overall, and LOS D or better for the through movements of major legs." The study estimates that the project will generate 526 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the PM peak hour. The study recommends the following measures to mitigate the projected impacts: 1. Extending traffic signal cycle lengths to 90 seconds from the current 80 seconds. In all cases, the additional green time gained by this change should be allocated to the northbound and southbound US 7 movements. This will reinforce Shelburne Road's function as a principle arterial. Extending cycle lengths to 90 seconds will enhance mobility on US 7 and thus is consistent with efforts in residential neighborhoods proximate to US 7 to eliminate or reduce cut through traffic. Extending cycle lengths to 90 seconds for the entire corridor could result in eliminating protected -permitted left turn signal phasing. Finally, extending cycle lengths could also enable the introduction of pedestrian phases at selected intersections. 3 2. A queue length analysis indicates that the southbound storage bay at the Home Ave./US 7 intersection needs to be extended to 200 feet. The MPO has reviewed this study. At the request of the Development Review Board, the applicant has developed a final timing plan for the US7/Home Ave./O'Dell Parkway intersection thereby enhancing pedestrian movement. 9. Sewer: The sewer allocation for this project will be handled by the City of Burlington due to insufficient storage capacity at the Farrell Street sewer pumping station. 10. Building Height: The four (4) multi -family dwelling buildings and the congregate housing facility are proposed to be 45 ft. in height and the mixed use building is proposed to be 60 ft. in height. These are pitched roof structures which under Section 25.113 (a) of the zoning regulations have a maximum height limit of 40 ft. Under Section 25.113 (b) of the Zoning regulations, the DRB approved an increase in height for a residential structure up to 45 ft. at preliminary plat as the Board determined that the taller structures: (i) will utilize topography and will relate to other existing and proposed structures so as to be aesthetically compatible with the neighborhood; (ii) will not detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public streets and walkways; and (iii) will allow retention of additional green space that will enhance the appearance of the developed property. Section 25.113 (c) of the zoning regulations allows the Board to approve a non-residential structure which exceeds the height limitation provided the Board determines that a taller structure: (i) will not a affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; and (ii) will not detract from important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. The mixed use building, which is proposed to be 60 feet in height, includes residential use. It does not appear that the regulations allow a building with residential use to exceed 45 ft in height. It was staffs understanding that the intent of this section was to limit heights in residential districts and to allow for greater heights in commercial districts. The Board made a determination at preliminary plat on how to interpret the regulations and whether it could approve the taller structure. The Board made a determination that this section means "predominately non-residential" in which case this building being not predominately residential be allowed to exceed 45 ft. 4 Section 25.113 (d) of the zoning regulations requires additional setbacks for taller structures. The two (2) easterly residential buildings, the congregate housing facility and the mixed use building do not meet this requirement. The Board waived the requirements of this section at preliminary plat as the general objectives of the PUD and applicable zoning district are met. 11. F000dglain: The Overlay District map indicates that a portion of this property lies within the 100 year floodplain. The applicant indicates that the property is not within any floodplain and there are no streams on the property. The applicant provided a written certification to this effect from an engineer. 12 School Impact: The applicant has submitted a School Impact Questionnaire, in connection with the Act 250 application. The questionnaire indicates that the impact of the project can be accommodated by the schools. 13. Recreation Path: The Recreation Path Committee reviewed the application at their January 3, 2000 meeting. The Committee recommends that an east -west recreation path be constructed between Farrell Street and Shelburne Road and that a north -south recreation path be built to connect to Hadley Road. The applicant submitted a memo addressing the Committee's request and neighborhood concerns. The plans do not show a recreation path and the applicant has stated that it is their intention not to build it. Staff recommended that the path be constructed as it is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan (see access discussion). It is the suggestion of staff that the applicant provide an easement for the path and bond for its construction. The City would hold public meetings on the construction of the recreation path and may then construct the path if it deems fit. 14. Boundary adjustments: Several boundary lot adjustments are proposed between the two (2) parcels which are part of this PUD and the adjacent Mall 189 property. There are also lot adjustments between the Burlington Indoor Tennis Facility and the property to its west. These lot adjustments will result in all lots complying with the dimensional and area requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 15. Legal documents: This PUD will result in the creation of eight (8) lots. Prior to issuance of the first zoning permit, the applicant should record a `Notice of Conditions' approved by the City Attorney that states for zoning and subdivision purposes, all the lots in the PUD shall be treated as one (1) lot. Prior to issuance of the first zoning permit, the applicant should record legal documents approved by the City Attorney, (e.g. irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed pubic road, utility, sewer, drainage, water, etc.) 16. Li tin : All lights must be downcasting and shielded. The Director of Planning and Zoning has reviewed the proposed lights and has the following concerns: a) The location of all exterior lights, including building mounted lights, must be shown on the proposed site plans. Currently only the area lighting is illustrated. b) The pedestrian lighting does not appear to meet standards as the bulb is not shielded and the fixture does not appear to be cut off and downcasting. 5 c) The roadway lighting must be of the type supplied by Green Mountain Power. The applicant should specify if metal halide or high pressure sodium will be used. The applicant should revise the plans as noted and submit the changes to the Director for approval. 17. Bus Stops: The overall site plan was submitted to the CCTA for approval of the new bus stops. 18. Wetlands: The Natural Resources Committee (NRC) at their 12/29/99 meeting were provided a report from a wetland consultant which indicates that there are wetlands on this property. The NRC reviewed the report and submitted a memo outlining their position on this matter to the Board. Wetlands are delineated on the Overall Existing Conditions Plan. 19. Dumpster: All dumpsters must be enclosed. 20. P.U.D. report: The applicant submitted a written report addressing the P.U.D. criteria under Section 26.151 of the zoning regulations. 21. Other: The applicant should submit a proposed street name for the northern section of Farrell Street. The applicant should also submit detail on the proposed pedestrian crossing design for review by the Director of Public Works. DECISION AND CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Development Review Board approves final plat application #SD-0043 of Wright and Morrissey Realty Company for a mixed use planned unit development consisting of: 1) a 95 room hotel, 2)160 residential units in four (4) buildings, 3) a 130 unit congregate housing facility, 4) subdividing two (2) parcels of 24.458 acres into eight (8) lots, 5) a 114,450 square foot building which will include 11,000 sq. ft. of retail, a 150 seat 7,500 sq. ft. restaurant, 70,000 sq. ft. of general office, 2,500 sq. ft. of drive-in bank, and ten (10) residential units, 6) a 7200 square foot addition to an indoor recreational facility, and 7) an existing 16,000 sq. ft. television studio and office building, Farrell Street and Shelburne Road, as depicted on a 38 page set of plans, page two (2) entitled, "Plat of Boundary Survey Properties to be Included in and Adjacent to ODell Parkway PUD South Burlington Vermont," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated June, 2000, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations, which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public road, and utility, sewer, drainage, water and pedestrian path, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 2 3. Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition -92 above, the applicant shall post a bond that covers the cost of said improvements. 4. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., road, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer, "as -built" construction drawings certified by a licensed engineer. 5. The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Four (4) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to recording. a) The final plat plans shall be revised to note the Conservation & Open Space District as such and not a Conservation Easement. b) The final plat plan (sheet 1) shall be revised to show a 20 feet easement for a recreation path connecting Hadley Road with the extension of Farrell Street to be located between the Kochman and Johnson properties. c) The plat plans shall be revised to show the zoning boundary between the R4 District and the C1 and C2 District. d) The plat plans shall be revised to expand the green space along the front of the westerly portion of the mixed use building by removing all the parking in front of the building. On -street parking shall be added along the street in front of this building to replace some of the lost spaces resulting from the added green space. e) The plat plans shall be revised to show when the interstate ramp begins and to eliminate all encroachments (i.e., walkway, recreation path, etc.) from the C.O. District which are not along the interstate ramp. f) The plat plans shall be revised to show finished contours along the C.O. District to ensure that filling and re -grading do not occur within the C.O. District. g) The plat plans shall be revised to show the location of all exterior lights, including building mounted lights. h) The lighting details shall be revised to show downcasting shielded fixtures for the pedestrian lighting. i) The plat plans shall be revised to include the design details for the proposed pedestrian street crossings. j) The landscaping plans shall be revised to include the water, sewer and drainage plans 7 and show that trees will not be placed on top of these mains. 6. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for the first building, the applicant shall bond for the construction of the recreation path extending between Hadley Road and the extended Farrell Street for a period of three (3) years. The applicant shall be responsible for the construction of this path during the three (3) year period if deemed necessary by the City. 7. The applicant shall post a $31,658 landscape bond for street trees prior to start of road construction and a $132,875 landscape bond for the project prior to issuance of a permit. This bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. 8. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for the first building, the applicant shall provide street numbers for the development and the renamed portion of Farrell Street. 9. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant shall submit a name for that portion of Farrell Street south of Joy Drive which is acceptable to the Director. 10. Pursuant to Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the South Burlington Development Review Board modifies the setback requirements as shown on the approved plans. 11. The South Burlington Development Review Board, pursuant to Section 3.505 of the zoning regulations, allows encroachment in the C.O. District along the interstate ramps. It is the Board's opinion that the criteria under Section 3.505(a) and (b) are being met. 12. Pursuant to Sections 25.113(b) and (c) of the zoning relations, the South Burlington Development Review Board approves taller structures within the development as follows: the four (4) multi -family dwelling buildings and the congregate housing facility with a maximum height of 45 feet and the mixed use building with a maximum height of 60 feet. It is the Board's opinion that the criteria under Sections 25.113(b) and (c) are being met for the taller structures. It is also the Board's opinion that it is the intent of the zoning regulations to allow "predominately non-residential" buildings to exceed the 45 foot height limit and the mixed use buildings are "predominately non-residential." 13. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building, the applicant shall record a "Notice of Conditions" approved by the City Attorney which states that for zoning and subdivision purposes, all lots within the PUD shall be treated as one (1) lot: 14. In order to mitigate the projected traffic impacts from this development, the applicant shall implement the following measures prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first building: a) Submit a final timing sequence implementation planwhich has been agreed to by both VTrans and the City of Burlington for the entire traffic signal system along U.S. Route 7. This plan shall also address extending the traffic cycle lengths to 90 seconds for the entire corridor. b) The southbound storage bay at the Home Avenue/US 7 intersection shall be extended to 200 feet as part of the construction of the extension of Farrell Street as shown on the plan entitled "US Route 7 Striping Modifications," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, dated 8/23/00. 15. All new buildings shall be sprinklered and include fire alarms. 16. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building, the applicant shall submit a letter from the City of Burlington granting approval for the traffic mitigation improvements. 17. Trees shall not be planted on top of water, sewer and drainage lines including the Champlain Water District main along I-189. 18. The Development Review Board pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, approves a total of 1006 spaces which represents a 72 space or 6.7% waiver. 19. The Development Review Board, pursuant to Section 3.505 of the zoning regulations, approves encroachment along the interstate ramp as shown on the approve plans. It is the Board's opinion that the criteria under Section 3.505(a) - (b) are being met. 20. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building, the applicant shall specify if metal halide or high pressure sodium will be used. The roadway lighting must be of the type supplied by Green Mountain Power. 21. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building the applicant shall submit the legal documents (irrevocable offer of dedication, deeds, etc.) to convey to the City the private street known as Bacon Street This street shall be upgraded to City standards prior to acceptance by the City. 22_ All curbs shall be concrete not asphalt. 23. Storm catch basin and sanitary sewer manholes which will be maintained by the City shall be adjusted to grade using manufactured or poured concrete risers not bricks and motor. 24. Sanitary sewer mains shall be bedded in 3/4 inch crushed stone with no gravel alternate as plans show. 25. Lighting standards shall not be placed on top of water, sewer and drainage mains. 26. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board 27. The final plat plans (survey plat sheet 1, and sheets C 3, C-6 and C-7) shall be recorded in the land E records within 90 days or this approval is null and void The plans shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. 28. Applicant will assure Farrell Street will be completed within 90 days of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on the first residential building. 29. With respect to the construction of Farrell Street, staff, applicant and adjoining businesses will have to meet prior to construction to assure minimal impact to businesses. 30. The applicant will comply with conditions of construction agreed to as discussed in the meeting and as a matter of record. Chair or Clerk South Burlington Development Review Board Date 10 WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. 99 Swift Street, Suite 100, So. Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 863-4541 GENERAL CONTRACTORS P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 Fax 865-1253 February 14, 2005 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington, Planning and Zoning Dept. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: City's Edge — O'Dell Parkway PUD-Building Five 409 Farrell Street, South Burlington, VT W&M Project #03-370 Certificate of Occupancy Dear Ray, We are in the final stages of construction on the City's Edge project. Please find attached our Application for Inspection for the Certificate of Occupancy, accompanied by the appropriate fee. As discussed, we are requesting a conditional Certificate of Occupancy because there are some landscape plantings that are currently missing and will be installed this spring. There are also lawn areas that need to be established when weather permits. We have attached a copy of Landscape Plan S3 and marked it up to show the incomplete work. Also attached is a "Punch List" noting incomplete work based on the 12/6/2004 inspection by the Project's Landscape Architect, T.J. Boyle & Associates. We plan to meet you on the Project site on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 10:30 a.m. to conduct an inspection. Please let us know if you will require any further information prior to this date. Sincerely, Jo Gallagher Project Manager Attachments cc: Amy Demetrowitz, BUT Mark Gilbert, W&M File -Permits CM OF SOUTH BURLINGT N APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY The undersigned herewith requests an inspection of the premises indicated below and issuance of a "Certificate of Occupancy", pursuant to Section 17.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. W Property Owner: 6c- TV LAIjz� r Mailing Address: -' �`� e ` 2 V 1 Property Address: _4co, T �>Ig66T The work for which a Certificate of Occupancy is being requested was completed on as authorized under Zoning Permit # ated 'Z ❑ Home Occupation Request Pi6perty/6w4er Signat� e Dat6 Fee: $60.00 Application received on: Application #CO ❑ Temporary Certificate of Occupancy will expire on to provide the applicant time to complete the following improvements: ❑ Permanent Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Application denied for the following reasons: Administrative Officer's Signature Date T. J,-Boyle `and Associates �_ ___M : 4W landscape . planning 301 college street • burlington • vermont 05401 Phone (802) 658-3555 fax (802) 863-1562 Memo To: Mark Gilbert, Wright & Morrissey Amy Demetrowitz, BCLT Sue Cobb, HVT From: Adam Portz Date: 12/06/04 Re: City's Edge Substantial Landscape Inspection Punch List On December 6, 2004, Terry Boyle and I performed an inspection of the landscape planting at City's Edge per our specifications and agreement with BCLT. I have organized my comments into four major sections; the overall quality and workmanship, plants missing from Permit Plan, plants missing from Bid Plan, and General Site Comments. The following is a punch list outlining comments and concerns of the landscape planting related to the Permit drawings (Landscape Plan, Sheet S3, dated 09/ 16/03) performed by Green Mountain Landscaping Inc. A. Overall Quality and Workmanship (Landscape Plan, Sheet S3, dated 09/ 16/03) 1. Red Maples along entry drive appear to be planted to deep, check in the spring when ground has thawed. This is the case for many of the trees - Contractor should refer to Planting Details. 2. Prune bottom three limbs of Maple in back corner of parking lot - near Forsythia. This should be completed at end of next growing season (Fall 2005) - prior to (1) year inspection. 3. Fine grading in the following areas will need to be refined and re -seeded in spring time: southwest corner of site, along embankment near garage air vent, south of concrete pad for dumpster area, south of main entry in lawn area, and along south building face as the ground is settling. 4. Stake (8) Ash along parking lot south edge in spring. Plants are exposed to wind. Fourth ash west of catch basin appears to be infected with ash borer. If this is the case, tree should be removed immediately and others monitored during the spring. 5. Prune (3) Silver Maples near garage air vent at end of next growing season (Fall 2005) - prior to (1) year inspection. 6. Remove string and debris from River Birch planted on south side of building. 7. Pruning on the River Birch is not consistent - sometimes leaving stubs (not good pruning practice). We can review with Contractor in spring - many lower branches should be removed. 8. Forsythias south of garage entry not located per plan. Numbers between Approval and Bid differ. What was planted does not match either. I believe (29) were planted. 9. Austrian Pines planted behind concrete dumpster pad need to be set plum. At least (3) of these pines should be reset and at minimum (1) replanted because of damage. All pines appear to be planted too deep, check in the spring when the ground has thawed. 10. Adjust spacing of (11) Forsythia along east side of garage entry to be equal. 11. Check planting bed definition in springtime - across the entire site. GActive Projects\O'Dell Parkway Building 5\ Other Documents\Construciton\l2-06-04 Inspection Memo.doc 12. Plant location and numbers need to be verified and adjusted at the northeast and southwest entry. Coordinate with landscape architect in spring. 13. (1) Halka located near second bay west of the stoop entry is unsatisfactory (crooked) and should be replaced. 14. Prune yews with hand clippers to shape and promote dense growth in spring. 15. Missing Rhododendrons at entry points. 16. Ash planted in parking lot islands should be set plum - per planting details. Complete in spring. B. Plants missing from Permit Plan' (Landscape Plan, Sheet S3, dated 09/ 16/03) —_- (1)-GTH-Haika Honeylocust - missing near temporary heater. Area was and is not ready to plant. (8)-CA-Ruby Spice Summersweet - originally planned for northwest corner of building but the airway vent was located there after Bid Documents were produced. We reduced to (7) and located in nearby areas - (4) to the east and (3) west (by the original sign which is no longer there) ie. we would need to find a home for these plants. (3)-RC-Chionoides Rhododendron - missing all three. (2)-TMD-Dense Spreading Yew- missing (1) at front entry and (1) at northeast entry. (7)-EFV-Big Leaf Wintercreeper - missing all (7) near northeast entry. Russian Cypress was planted in the location of the Wintercreeper. A new location for the wintercreeper will be determined in the spring. X-HH-Daylillies - plan called for (75) 2 Gal. plants. Does not appear to meet planting specification. (13)-MD-Russian Cypress - missing (13) Russian Cypress along north side of building along sidewalk. C. Plants missing from Bid Plan (Landscape Plan, Sheet L2, dated 09/ 16/03, missing a rev. date of 12/01/03), (1)-GTH-Halka Honeylocust - missing near temporary heater. Area was and is not ready to plant. (8)-CA-Ruby Spice Summersweet - originally planned for northwest corner of building but the airway vent was located there after Bid Documents were produced. We reduced to (7) and located in nearby areas - (4) to the east and (3) west (by the original sign which is no longer there) ie. we would need to find a home for these plants. (2)-FS-Forsythia - missing (2) near garage entry. Planting does not match either Approval Plan or Bid Plan. (1)-JOG-Juniper - missing (1) at northwest corner of building at sidewalk connection (3)-RC-Chionoides Rhododendron - missing all three. (8)-RR-Rosa - missing (8) in the islands of the parking lot although planting looks adequate. (7)-EFC-Purpleleaf Wintercreeper - missing all (7) near northeast entry. Russian Cypress was planted in the location of the Wintercreeper. Plants will need to be adjusted to make room for the wintercreeper. x-DD-Daylilies - plan called for (4) collections of Daffodils and Daylilies, each collection contains 100 bulbs of Daffodils and 50 Daylilies. I don't believe this was ordered or planted. Permit Plan did not call for (3) Red Maples — but these were planted. /� (31)-MD-Russian Cypress - missing (17) Russian Cypress along north side of building along sidewalk. Missing (11) near northeast entry under small birch grove/transformer, (3) are not accounted for. D. General Site Comments 1. Accessible parking spaces and striping does not appear to meet code. Should be 8'/8'/8'- striped area measures ±6'-0". 2. Fine Grading at northeast and southwest entries appears not to match plan. I thought we were using handrails along stoop edge and holding grade below slab. In this case, grading affects landscaping and should be coordinated. 3. Bike Rack is not yet in. 4. Lighting is not complete. S. Fencing around Dumpster Pad is not complete 6. Contractor is expected to provide (3) mowing per the specifications (See 02920 - Lawns and Grasses). In general, the landscape planting installation is substantially complete and T. J. Boyle & Associates recommends the start of maintenance and the one year guarantee on this day December 6, 2004 per the specifications, Section 02930. DOCUMENTS State of Vermont for RECORDING WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules CLER Effective August 16, 2002 Case Number: WW-4-1503-2 Fleceivedr OFFI c3t� PIN: EJ00-0172.02 2at V Landowner: F & M Development Company, LL�}f So Recorded i of. Burlington and Recur on:page Address: �..— P.O. Box 421 Attest: Burlington VT 05402-0421 j Donna S. Kini in This project, consisting of the change of use from 65 unit condominium buhS�, ing"9 residential units on Lot 2 and to amend Subdivision Permit #EC-4-2337 for a boundary line adjustment between Lot 1, with commercial uses approved by Permit #WW-4-1451, and Lot 2, with uses approved by this permit, served by municipal water and wastewater services located off Farrell Street in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. This does not constitute approval under Act 250 case number 4C1071. GENERAL 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor & Industry — telephone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 879-2300 and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: Project No. 99101, Sheet 1 "Boundary Adjustment Between Lot 1 and Lot 2 O'Dell Parkway PUD" dated April 23, 2004; Sheet C-3 "Overall Site Plan" dated 11-18-99 last revised 4-20-04; Drawing Number C-7B "Eastwood Commons Utilities Plan" dated 8- 28-03 last revised 4-20-04; Drawing Number C-12 "Utility Details + Sections" dated 11- 18-99 last revised 3-3-04; Drawing Number C-17 "Specifications" dated 11-18-99 last revised 5-1-00; and Drawing Number C-1' "Specifications" dated 11-18-99 last revised 3-19-04 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans in a manner that would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location or the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 4. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. All conditions set forth in Permit #EC-4-2337, #WW-4-1503 and #WW-4-1503-1 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit DOCUMENTS WW-4-1503-2 for F & M Development Company, LLC RECORDING Page 2 6. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the water and wastewater disposal systems under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 64 — Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit. 7. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. 8. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction, and upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 9. No permit issued by the Secretary shall be valid for a substantially completed potable water supply and wastewater system until the Secretary receives a certification from a designer or the installer, signed and dated, that states: "I hereby certify that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply and wastewater system were installed in accordance with the permitted design and all permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfully met those performance tests." This shall include the water supply system, and wastewater disposal system, water service lines and sanitary sewer lines to each structure. 10. The project is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system as depicted on the approved plans. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of obtaining potable water without prior review and approval. 11. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by the construction of a connection to the municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 34,440 gallons of wastewater per day. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of wastewater disposal without prior review and approval. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on June 25, 2004. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By — Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer C For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Water Supply Division Act 250 District Environmental Commission Department of Labor & Industry State of Vermont WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules Effective August 16, 2002 Case Number: WW-4-1450-1 PIN: EJ00-0172.01 Landowner: EF Farrell, LLC Address: P. O. Box 1335 Burlington VT 05402 This project, consisting of amending Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit #WW-4- 1450 to convert the 95 room extended stay hotel with to a 60 unit condominium building on Lot 4 of Subdivision Permit #EC-4-2337 served by municipal water and wastewater services located off Farrell Street in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved tinder the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. This does not constitute approval under Act 250 case number 4C1071. 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Supply Division — telephone (802) 241-3400, the Department of Labor & Industry — telephone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 879-2300, and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Proj. No. 99101; Drawing Number C- 3 "Overall Site Plan" dated 11-18-99 last revised 12-1-03 and Drawing Number C-7 "Southeast Utilities Plan" dated 11-18-99 last revised 12-1-03 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. 3. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans in a manner, which would change, or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal, building location or the approved use of the building without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 4. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 5. All conditions set forth in Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit #WW-4- 1450 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. 6. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. • Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-1450-1 EF Farrell, LLC Page 2 7. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the water and wastewater disposal systems under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 64 — Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit 8. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction, and upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 9. No permit issued by the Secretary shall be valid for a substantially completed potable water supply and wastewater system until the Secretary receives a certification from a designer or the installer, signed and dated, that states: "I hereby certify that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply and wastewater system were installed in accordance with the pennitted design and all permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfully met those performance tests." 10. The project is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system as depicted on the approved plans. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of obtaining potable water without prior review and approval. The landowner is responsible to apply for and receive approval from the Water Supply Division for any modifications to "Public Water System Permit to Construct" for Project #E-1123, WSID #5091 issued to Dan Morrissey dated December 22, 2000 prior to construction of the water supply system. 11. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by the construction of a connection to the municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 12,600 gallons of wastewater per day. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of wastewater disposal without prior review and approval. Dated at Esser Junction, Vermont on January 8, 2004. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer C For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board DB Morrissey, LLC Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Act 250 District Environmental Commission #4 Water Supply Division Department of Labor & Industry