HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0102 Ethan Allen DriveSTITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
171 BATTERY STREET
P.O. BOX 1507
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507
(802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD)
STEVEN F. STITZEL
FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119
PATTI R. PAGE
WWW.FIRMSPF.COM
ROBERT E. FLETCHER
E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPF.COM)
JOSEPH S. McLEAN
WRITER'S E-MAIL (JKLESCH@FIRMSPF.COM)
AMANDA S. E. LAFFERTY
WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-9119
WILLIAM E. FLENDER
August 20, 2008
Jacalyn M. Fletcher, Court Manager
Vermont Environmental Court
5418 Airport Road
Barre, VT 05641-8701
Re: Appeal of John Belter and Joyce Belter NOV for Fill
Placement
Docket Nos. 154-7-08 Vtec and 155-7-08 Vtec
Dear Jackie:
OF COUNSEL
JOHN H. KLESCH
DINA L. ATWOOD
Enclosed for filing please find a Notice of Appearance in
connection with the above -referenced matters.
Enclosure
ncerely,
Joh H. Ke"sch
CC: David W. Rugh, Esq.
Hobart F. Popick, Esq.
Mark Sperry, Esq.
Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer
son08-098.cor
STATE OF VERMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
IN RE: APPEAL OF JOHN BELTER and )
JOYCE BELTER OF NOTICE OF ) DOCKET NOS. 155-7-08 VTEC
VIOLATION FOR FILL PLACEMENT ) 154-7-08 VTEC
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
NOW COMES JOHN H. KLESCH, of the firm of Stitzel, Page &
Fletcher, P.C., and hereby enters his appearance in the above -
referenced matter by and on behalf of the City of South
Burlington.
DATED at Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State
of Vermont, this 20th day of August, 2008.
I=
STITZEL, PAGE &
FLETCHER, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
171 BATTERY STREET
PO. BOX 1507
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
05402-1507
STIT/GA, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C.
John H.�'Kiesch, Esq.
171 Ba ery Street
P. y 6x 1507
Bu 1;ngton, VT 05401-1507
r
pWE
!0
southburlington
PLANNING & ZONING
July 24, 2008
Hobart F. Popick, Esq.
Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP
PO Box 721
Burlington, VT 05402-0721
Re; Joyce Belter NOV — Docket No. 155-7-08 Vtec
Dear Mr. Popick:
Pursuant to Rule 5(b)(4)(A) of the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings
(also see 24 V.S.A. §4471(c)), the following is a list of "interested persons" for the above
referenced proceeding. You are instructed by that Rule to serve a copy of your client's
notice of appeal upon all the people or entities listed below, by certified mail.
Mark Sperry, Esq.
Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP
PO Box 721
Burlington, VT 05402-0721
Jon Anderson, Esq.
Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC
PO Box 787
Burlington, VT 05402-0787
When the DRB sent out its notice on the above referenced application, the following
additional people or entities were provided a copy of the DRB notice (this list does not
include the persons noted above who appeared at the DRB hearing):
Terry & Bethany Lieberman
44 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
James Kirchgassner
45 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www,sburi.com
Neil & Patricia Zoller
46 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Lastly, I recommend that you consult the statutory definition for "interested persons"
contained in 24 V.S.A. §4465(b). If you believe that our list is missing someone who has
interested persons status in this proceeding, you should consider sending them a copy of
the notice of appeal, so that you can be confident that all persons or entities who are
entitled to notice have received it.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
jSincered J. Belair
r"Administrative Officer
cc: Vermont Environmental Court
John Klesch, Esq.
r
®A
►
southburfington
PLANNING & ZONING
July 24, 2008
Hobart F. Popick, Esq.
Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP
PO Box 721
Burlington, VT 05402-0721
Re; John Belter NOV — Docket No. 154-7-08 Vtec
Dear Mr. Popick:
Pursuant to Rule 5(b)(4)(A) of the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings
(also see 24 V.S.A. §4471(c)), the following is a list of "interested persons" for the above
referenced proceeding. You are instructed by that Rule to serve a copy of your client's
notice of appeal upon all the people or entities listed below, by certified mail.
Mark Sperry, Esq.
Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP
PO Box 721
Burlington, VT 05402-0721
Jon Anderson, Esq.
Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC
PO Box 787
Burlington, VT 05402-0787
When the DRB sent out its notice on the above referenced application, the following
additional people or entities were provided a copy of the DRB notice (this list does not
include the persons noted above who appeared at the DRB hearing):
Terry & Bethany Lieberman
44 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
James Kirchgassner
45 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802,846.4101 www.sburl.com
Neil & Patricia Zoller
46 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Lastly, I recommend that you consult the statutory definition for "interested persons"
contained in 24 V.S.A. §4465(b). If you believe that our list is missing someone who has
interested persons status in this proceeding, you should consider sending them a copy of
the notice of appeal, so that you can be confident that all persons or entities who are
entitled to notice have received it.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Raymon Belair
Administrative Officer
cc: Vermont Environmental Court
John Klesch, Esq.
VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington VT 05403
Joyce Belter NOV Docket No. 155-7-08 Vtec
(802) 828-1660
2418 Airport Road, Ste.1
Barre, Vermont 05641 - 8701
July 22, 2008
The above -referenced appeal from a municipal panel, district commission,
agency of natural resources or agency of agriculture was received at the
Environmental Court on 07/18/2008. Environmental Court docket number
155-7-08 Vtec has been assigned to this appeal. Please use the Environmental
Court docket number and the above case name when filing any documents or asking
any questions concerning this case. Please note, this case name may not be
final if we are missing necessary information from the appellant.
All documents should be filed with the Environmental Court at the address
at the top of this letter. Also, if you have not provided the Court with a
telephone number where you can be reached during working hours for the purpose
of telephone conferences, please do so as soon as possible.
The Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings (V.R.E.C.P.) set out
the procedures to follow for this appeal. Enclosed is a copy of those Rules,
minus Rules 3 & 4 which are not applicable in this type of action. I have
also omitted some of the Reporter's Notes. You may obtain a full copy of the
Rules and Reporter's Notes at www.vermontjudiciary.org.
1. The person filing the appeal is called "the appellant." The appellant must
take certain actions in order to assure that this appeal is not dismissed.
Consult the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings to see what those
actions are. For requirements regarding the appellant's responsibility to
notify interested parties, see V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A); see also Form 900
available on the Court's web site at www.vermontjudiciary.org or by calling the
Court at the above number and requesting that one be sent to you.
2. This case will be ready for hearing or other appropriate disposition when
the time for filing the appellant's statement of questions has expired, or 20
days after the notice to interested parties has been sent, whichever occurs
later. To complete service of appeals, the appellant must do as follows:
From an Appropriate Municipal Panel, follow V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A).
The clerk of the appropriate municipal panel must provide the
appellant with a list of interested persons within five working days
of the municipality's receipt of a copy of the notice of appeal.
July 22, 2008 -Page 2- 155-7-08 Vtec
From .a District Commission, District Coordinator or the Secretary of the
Agency of Natural Resource, follow V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(B): Take special
notice that no list of interested parties will be provided by the
tribunal, other than the service list on the decision appealed from.
The Court may extend that time if a request is made by written motion filed
with the Court before the deadline has expired. If this case is set for a
hearing on the merits, the hearing will take place in or near the county in
which the case originated. Please note that pursuant to V.R.E.C.P. 5 (b)(4)
(g), these appeals are de novo, unless the municipality has adopted procedures
to make certain appeals on the record.
3. Faxing a copy of a document is not sufficient to meet deadlines for filing
documents with the Court. Faxed copies may be authorized by the Court in
certain circumstances, but the Court will not accept Faxed documents unless the
sender has first telephoned the Court and obtained permission to do so or and
unless the judge has authorized it in a scheduling order.
4. The person filing any document (including letters) with the Court must also
send a copy of that document to each of the other parties.
The Clerk of the Environmental Court will contact the parties to arrange
for a pre -hearing conference in person or by telephone with a judge or with a
case manager. Before the initial conference, the Appellant is requested to
provide the Court with a copy of the decision being appealed from. The Court
finds it useful in preparing to discuss the appeal with the parties at the
initial conference.
Sincerely,
Manager/designee
CC: Municipality, City of South Burlington
Hobart F. Popick, Attorney for Appellant, Joyce N. Belter
Vermont Environmental Court
2418 Airport Road, Suite 1
Barre, VT 05641-8701
(802) 828-1660
July 23, 2008
----------------------------------------
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington VT 05403
----------------------------------------
Joyce Belter NOV Docket No. 155-7-08 Vtec
Please see the enclosed ENTRY ORDER issued by Judge Thomas S. Durkin on
July 22, 2008. Also enclosed for the Appellant is Attorney Popick's check
#11672 in the amount of $250.
CC: Municipality, City of South Burlington
Hobart F. Popick, Attorney for Appellant, Joyce N. Belter
Environmental Court of Vermont FILED
State of Vermont
JUL 2 2 2008
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY REGARD I N G M0TI0NVERMONT
Joyce Belter NOV
Municipal DRB Notice of Violation
Title: Motion To Waive the Filing Fee, No. 1
Filed: July 18, 2008
Filed By: Popick, Hobart F., Attorney for:
Appellant Joyce N. Belter
Response: NONE
XGranted
Denied
Scheduled for hearing on: at
RE: Docket Numbers 154-7-08 and 155-7-08.
Docket No. 155-7-08 Vtec
Other
; Time Allotted
These related Notice of Violation appeals appear to arrise from identical
violation allegations, separately issued to John & Joyce Belter, based upon the
same activities occuring on a parcel of land co -owned by the Appellants. The
matters are henceforth consolidated; Appellants' request that one of their two
filing fees be fully refunded is hereby GRANTED.
I
�•�, h ►. q .',v.`u 2 2 2oa , .
Judge Date
Date copies sent to: 7 U �� Clerk's Initials -
Copies sent to:
Municipality City of South Burlington
Attorney Hobart F. Popick for Appellant Joyce N. Belter
sothbur11
i o
CY
PLANNING & ZONING
July 23, 2008
David W. Rugh, Esq.
Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC
PO Box 787
Burlington, VT 05402-0787
Re: Lieberman NOV — Docket No. 142-7-08
Dear Mr. Rugh:
Pursuant to Rule 5(b)(4)(A) of the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings,
(also see 24 V.S.A. §4471(c)), the following is a list of "interested persons" for the above
proceeding. You are instructed by that Rule to serve a copy of your client's notice of
appeal upon all the people or entities listed below, by certified mail.
Jon Anderson, Esq.
Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC
PO Box 787
Burlington, VT 05402-0787
David W. Rugh, Esq.
Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC
PO Box 787
Burlington, VT 05402-0787
When the DRB sent out it's notice on the above referenced application, the following
additional people or entities were provided a copy of the DRB notice (this list does not
include the persons noted above who appeared at the DRB hearing.
John & Joyce Belter
2 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
James Kirchgassner
45 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 057403
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com
Neil & Patricia Zoller
46 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Lastly, I recommend that you consult the statutory definition for "interested persons"
contained in 24 V.S.A. §4465(b). If you believe that our list is missing someone who has
interested persons status in this proceeding, you should consider sending them a copy of
the notice of appeal, so that you can be confident that all persons or entities who are
entitled to notice have received it.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
ASinc
t�
t
ay on J. Belair
Administrative Officer
cc: Vermont Environmental Court
John Klesch, Esq.
VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
----------------------------------------
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington VT 05403
----------------------------------------
Lieberman NOV
Docket No. 142-7-08 Vtec
(802) 828-1660
2418 Airport Road, Ste.1
Barre, Vermont 05641 - 8701
July 15, 2008
The above -referenced appeal from a municipal panel, district commission,
agency of natural resources or agency of agriculture was received at the
Environmental Court on 07/14/2008. Environmental Court docket number
142-7-08 Vtec has been assigned to this appeal. Please use the Environmental
Court docket number and the above case name when filing any documents or asking
any questions concerning this case. Please note, this case name may not be
final if we are missing necessary information from the appellant.
All documents should be filed with the Environmental Court at the address
at the top of this letter_ Also, if you have not provided the Court with a
telephone number where you can be reached during working hours for the purpose
of telephone conferences, please do so as soon as possible.
The Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings (V.R.E.C.P.) set out
the procedures to follow for this appeal. Enclosed is a copy of those Rules,
minus Rules 3 & 4 which are not applicable in this type of action. I have
also omitted some of the Reporter's Notes. You may obtain a full copy of the
Rules and Reporter's Notes at www.vermontjudiciary.org.
1. The person filing the appeal is called "the appellant." The appellant must
take certain actions in order to assure that this appeal is not dismissed.
Consult the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings to see what those
actions are. For requirements regarding the appellant's responsibility to
notify interested parties, see V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A); see also Form 900
available on the Court's web site at www.vermontjudiciary.org or by calling the
Court at the above number and requesting that one be sent to you.
2. This case will be ready for hearing or other appropriate disposition when
the time for filing the appellant's statement of questions has expired, or 20
days after the notice to interested parties has been sent, whichever occurs
later. To complete service of appeals, the appellant must do as follows:
From an Appropriate Municipal Panel, follow V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A).
The clerk of the appropriate municipal panel must provide the
appellant with a list of interested persons within five working days
of the municipality's receipt of a copy of the notice of appeal.
July 15, 2008 -Page 2- 142-7-08 Vtec
From a District Commission, District Coordinator or the Secretary of the
Agency of Natural Resource, follow V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(B): Take special
notice that no list of interested parties will be provided by the
tribunal, other than the service list on the decision appealed from.
The Court may extend that time if a request is made by written motion filed
with the Court before the deadline has expired. If this case is set for a
hearing on the merits, the hearing will take place in or near the county in
which the case originated. Please note that pursuant to V.R.E.C.P. 5 (b)(4)
(g), these appeals are de novo, unless the municipality has adopted procedures
to make certain appeals on the record.
3. Faxing a copy of a document is not sufficient to meet deadlines for filing
documents with the Court. Faxed copies may be authorized by the Court in
certain circumstances, but the Court will not accept Faxed documents unless the
sender has first telephoned the Court and obtained permission to do so or and
unless the judge has authorized it in a scheduling order.
4. The person filing any document (including letters) with the Court must also
send a copy of that document to each of the other parties.
The Clerk of the Environmental Court will contact the parties to arrange
for a pre -hearing conference in person or by telephone with a judge or with a
case manager. Before the initial conference, the Appellant is requested to
provide the Court with a copy of the decision being appealed from. The Court
finds it useful in preparing to discuss the appeal with the parties at the
initial conference.
Sincerely,
alyn M. Fletcher, Court Manager/designee
CC: Municipality, City of South Burlington
Jon T. Anderson, Attorney for Appellant, Terry Lieberman
Jon T. Anderson, Attorney for Appellant, Bethany Lieberman
Co -Counsel for Appellant, David W. Rugh
B►U ANDERSON
MELLONI PLC
Counsellors at Law
J U L 1 4 2008 '
ST{TZEL PAGE & FLEl'ifkf_l�, PC
Jacalyn Fletcher, Court Manager
Vermont Environmental Court
2418 Airport Road, Suite 1
Barre, VT 05641-8701
Michael L. Burak`
Jon Anderson
Thomas R. WNW"
Michael B. Rosenberg'
Shane W. McCormack'$
NV Scott Fewell 11
Auja Freiburg
David W. laugh"°
Gateway Square • 30 Main Street
Post Office Box 787
Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787
Phone: 802 862-0500
Fax: 802 862.8176
*Also admitted in New Yorlt
"Also admitted in Maryland
*Also admitted in the District of Columbia
$Also admitted in Massachusetts
"Also admitted in Connecticut & Pennsylvania
July 11, 2008
www:vtlawl.com
Re: Appeal of Lieberman Notice of Violation for Fill Placement Docket
No.
Dear Jackie:
Enclosed for filing in the above -referenced matter please find a Notice of Appeal of the
City of South Burlington's July 7, 2008 decision upholding a Notice of Violation for Fill
Placement on the property adjacent to that of Respondents Terry and Bethany Lieberman, at.44
Country Club Drive in South Burlington. We intend that this appeal will be consolidated with
Docket No. 100-5-08 Vtec, so a check for $100.00 is enclosed for a filing fee.
Sincerely,
avid W. Rugh, Esq.
Enclosure
cc: Mark Sperry, Esq.
John H. Klesch, Esq.
SACHMI Matters\80286\Letters\dwrfletch«4.doc
BURAK,ANDERSON
OL
MELLONIPLc
COUNSELLORS AT LAW
CATEW" SQUARE
30 MMN STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 787
BURUNMN, VERMONT
05402-0787
802 862-0500
STATE OF VERMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
-------------------------------X
APPEAL OF LIEBERMAN NOTICE
OF VIOLATION FOR FILL Docket No.
PLACEMENT
-------------------------- - - - - -
X
NOTICE OF APPEAL
NOW COMES Respondents Terry and Bethany Lieberman (the "Liebermans"), by and
through their attorneys, Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, and hereby appeals to the
Environmental Court a July 7, 2008 decision of the City of South Burlington Development
Review Board in Notice of Violation #NV-08-09, upholding a Notice of Violation for fill
placement on a piece of land adjacent to the Liebermans' property at 44 Country Club Drive in
South Burlington. The Liebermans are unable to apply for the placement of fill on the adjacent
property because the property's owners, John and Joyce Belter refuse to sign a permit application
for such fill placement. A copy of said decision is attached hereto.
This appeal is also related to an existing Environmental Court appeal, entitled Lieberman
PUD Preliminary Plat, Docket No. 100-5-08 Vtec. The Liebermans will request that this appeal -
be consolidated with the existing appeal of the Leibermans' preliminary plat application.
The property subject to this appeal is property owned by John and Joyce Belter adjacent
to 44 Country Club Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. Appellant -Applicants claims party
status pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4471, and their address is 44 Country Club Drive, So. Burlington,
Vermont 05403.
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: In order to participate in this appeal, you must
enter an appearance in the Vermont Environmental Court within twenty (20) days of receiving
this Notice of Appeal. Notices of Appearance should be mailed to Jacalyn M. Fletcher, Court
Manager, 2418 Airport Rd., Barre, VT 05641-8701.
Dated: July 11, 2008 BURAK ANDERSON & MELLONI, PLC
Burlington, Vermont.
By. ,
%e�:Anderson, Esq.
David W. Rugh, Esq.
SAClient Mattm%80286U egallnoticc of appeal fill NOV.doc
BI3It"ERsoN
MELLONI PLc
COUNSELLORS AT LAW
GATEWAY SQUARE
30 MAIVSTREET
YOSC OMCE BOX 787
BURLINGTON,VERMONT
05902-0787
802 862-0500
Attorneys for Terry and Bethany Lieberman
2
CITY OF SOUTH 13URLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
TERRY & BETHANY LIE13ERMAN
APPEAL #AO-08_08
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
Terry & Bethany Lieberman, hereinafter referred to as the appellants, appeal the
decisions of the Administrative Officer contained in Notices of Violation #NV-08-
#NV a
08-10, 102 Ethan Allen Drive. 09 and
The Development Review Board held a public hearing on Tuesday, June 3, 2008.
Rugh, Esq., represented the appellants. David
Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans
supporting materials' contained in the document file for this application, the Development
Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the foil
FINDINGS OF FACT
1, On April 23, 2008, the Administrative Officer
Receipt, Notices of Violation dated April 16, 2008, to TerCertified
&f B hany Lieberman
for a zoning violation at 102 Ethan Allen Drive (#NV-08- EXHI09 & #NV-08-10
BITS 1&2).
2. The Notices of Violation described the violation as: "Altered the existinggrade
[the] above referenced property in the vicinity of 44 Country Club Drive placing
or allowing to be placed fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil or other similar material in
an amount equal to or greater- than 20 cubic yards without approval of the
j Development Review Board and a zonin
I g Permit".
3. A Notice of Appeal (#AO-08-08) was filed on 5/1/08 by Terry & Bethany
j Lieberman (EXHIBIT 3), hereinafter referred to as A
Administrative Officer's determination in Notices of Violation appealing
& # e
08-10. NV-
4. A public notice on the appeal was published in Seven Days on May 14 2008
(EXHIBIT 4).
5. The fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material placed on the
Belters' property by Terry & Bethany Lieberman is depicted on a plan entitled,
"Topographic Survey for Terry & Bethany Lieberman 44 Country Club Drive So.
Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors, Inc., last revised on.
March 14, 2008 (EXHIBIT.5). The Liebermans' agent informed the
Administrative Officer that the Lieberman.5 placed approximately 200 cubic yards
Of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material on the Betters'
property.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
�. Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations requires approval of the
Development Review Board for the placement of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil,
or other similarmaterial equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards (EXHIBIT 6).
2. No one has obtained approval from the Development Review Board for the
Placement of more than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other
similar material on Appellant's property.
3. Section 17.02 of the Land Development Regulations states, in relevant part, that
"no land development may be commenced within the area affected by these
regulations without a zoning permit issued by the Administrative Officer"
(EXHIBIT 7). The definition of "land development" includes "[t]he construction,
reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation or enlargement of any
building or other structure, or of any mining, excavation or landfill ..." See
Article 2 of the Land Development Regulations. Since land development has
taken place on the 102 Ethan Allen Drive property by action of the appellants, the
Board concludes that the appellants are in violation of the Land Development
Regulations and 24 V.S.A. section 4449(a)(1).
4. No one has applied for or obtained a zoning
of . more
than 20. cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similart material on
Appellants property. Since no zoning permit has been issued for placement of
fill by the appellants on the 102 Ethan Allen Drive property, the Board concludes
that the appellants are in violation of the Land Development Regulations and 24
V.S.A. section 4449(a)(1).
DEC-- ISSN
motion by � �F f'1/1 secon�c ed. by
uphold the decisions of the Admi istrati*/�vepfficeran Notices of Violation '# 0/ 0
#NV-08-10 to Terry & Bethany Lieberman. 09 and
,Mark Behre nay/abs in/not present
Matthew Birmingh — ea nay/abstain/not present
John Dinklage — e nay abstain/not present
Roger Farley — ea ay/abstaln/notl resent
Eric Knudsen — yea/nay/abstain not resen
Peter Plumeau — yea/nay/abstai of presen
i Gayle Quimby.— ea ay/abstain/not present
Motion carried by a vote of 3 - C� _ 62
J 0 OG3
Signed this
John Din,klage, Chair
Please note: You have the right to appeal thiss decision to the Vermont Environmental
Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRECP 5 in writing, with`ift 3Q Mays of thh
Y - to this
decision is rssued. The fee is $225.00, If you faif, to appeal this decision, your right to
You will be bound by the decisiore���rsa�ne�rr�i�xiti�r,�ay-'rse�iizisi�pecause you Waited too Ian ,
n, Pursuant -to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivityof r g
emedY;
finality).
f
ai
t
STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
171 BATTERY STREET
P.O. BOX 1507
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507
(802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD)
STEVEN F. STITZEL
FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119
PATTI R. PAGE
WWW.FIRMSPF.COM
ROBERT E. FLETCHER
E-MAIL(FIRM2555(&,FIRMSPF.COM)
JOSEPH S. McLEAN
WRITER'S E-MAIL (JKLESCH@FIRMSPF.COM)
AMANDA S. E. LAFFERTY
WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-9119
WILLIAM E. FLENDER
July 22, 2008
Jacalyn M. Fletcher, Court Manager
Vermont Environmental Court
2418 Airport Road
Barre, VT 05641-8701
OF COUNSEL
JOHN IL KLESCH
DINA L. ATWOOD
Re: Appeal of Lieberman Notice of Violation for Fill Placement
Docket No.:
Dear Jacalyn:
Enclosed for filing with the Court is our Entry of
Appearance in connection with the above -referenced matter.
rely,
Jotin IH. Klesch
JHK/ j g
Enclosure
cc: Hobart F. Popick, Esq.
David Rugh, Esq.
Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer
son08-087.cor
STATE OF VERMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
IN RE: APPEAL OF LIEBERMAN NOTICE )
OF VIOLATION FOR FILL PLACEMENT ) DOCKET NO.:
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
NOW COMES JOHN H. KLESCH, of the firm of Stitzel, Page &
Fletcher, P.C., and hereby enters his appearance in the above -
referenced matter by and on behalf of the City of South
Burlington.
DATED at Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State
of Vermont, this 22nc1 day of July, 2008.
son08-036.1it
STITZEL, PAGE &
FLETCHER, P.C.
A'I'TORNEYS ,Vr LAW
171 BATTERY STREF,T
PO. BOX 1507
BL'RLINGTON, VERMONT
05402-1507
STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C.
Johh . Klesch
i
177 ttery Street, PO Box 1507
Bus ngton, VT 05402
(8 2) 660-2555
r
®1 ,%
WE
:a., �11
southburlington
CY
PLANNING & ZONING
July 21, 2008
John Klesch, Esq.
Stitzel Page & Fletcher
PO Box 1507
Burlington, VT 05402-1507
Re: DRB Appeals — Wesco, Inc. — 1118 Williston Road
John & Joyce Belter — 102 Ethan Allen Drive
Kathleen Kelleher — 911 Dorset Street #35
Dear John:
Enclosed, please find copies of Notices of Appeal for the above referenced appellants.
Please enter an appearance on behalf of the City for each appeal.
Thanks.
ZSin�cerJ. Bel r
Administrative Officer
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com
MIDDLEBURY LANGROCK SPERRY & WOOL, LLP
BURLINGTON
Peter F. Langrock
Ellen Mercer Fallon
William B. Miller, Jr.
James W. Swift
Emily J. Joselson
Mitchell L. Pearl
Kevin E. Brown
Frank H. Langrock
Beth Robinson
F. Rendol Barlow
Devin McLaughlin
Wanda Otero -Ziegler
Erin E. Ruble
July 17, 2008
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including a Professional Corporation
Jacalyn M. Fletcher, Court Manager
Vermont Environmental Court
2418 Airport Road
Barre, VT 05641-8701
Re: Appeal of John Belter of Notice of Violation for Fill Placement; and
Appeal of Joyce Belter of Notice of Violation for Fill Placement
Dear Jackie:
Enclosed for filing please find the following:
1. Notice of Appeal of John Belter;
2. A check in the amount of $250 to cover the filing fee;
3. Notice of Appeal of Joyce Belter; and
4. A check in the amount of $250 to cover the filing fee.
Michael W. Wool
Mark L. Sperry
Christopher L. Davis
Thomas Z. Carlson
Susan M. Murray
Alison J. Bell
Lisa B. Shelkrot
Eric M. Knudsen
David W. M. Conard
Thomas J. Sherrer
Sarah Gentry Tischler
Erin Miller Heins
Hobart F. Popick
REPLY TO:
Burlington Office
In light of the fact that Mr. and Mrs. Belter own the property in question jointly, I would request
that you give consideration to refunding one of the $250 checks, as this should be treated as one
appeal.
Very truly ours
Hobart F. Popick
HFP:mns
Enclosures
c: David Rugh, Esq.
South Burlington DRB c/o Ray Belair
466085.1
MIDDLEBURY: 111 S. Pleasant Street • P.O. Drawer 351 • Middlebury, Vermont 05753-0351
(802) 388.6356 • Fax (802) 388-6149 • Email: attorneys @langrock.com • Website: www.langrock.com
BURLINGTON: 210 College Street • P.O. Box 721 • Burlington, Vermont 05402.0721
(802) 864-0217 • Fax (802) 864-0137 • Email: attorneys @langrock.com • Website: www.langrock.com
IN RE: Appeal John Belter of Notice of Violation Environmental Court
for Fill Placement. Docket No.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
NOW COMES Respondent John Belter, by his attorneys, Langrock Sperry & Wool,
LLP, and, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4471, hereby appeals to the Environmental Court the July
7, 2008 decision of the City of South Burlington Development Review Board in Notice of
Violation #NV-08-061 (the "July 7 Decision"), upholding a Notice of Violation for fill
placement on property owned by John and Joyce Belter at 102 Ethan Allen Drive, South
Burlington, Vermont. (Copy of July 7 Decision attached hereto.) John Belter's residence and
mailing address is: 2 Country Club Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 05403.2
This appeal is related to the Appeal of Joyce Belter of Notice of Violation for Fill
Placement, filed herewith, which arises out of identical facts and circumstances concerning
the placement of fill on the 102 Ethan Allen Drive property and the adjacent 44 Country Club
Drive property, owned by Terry and Bethany Lieberman. Accordingly, Appellant requests
that the instant appeal be consolidated with the Appeal of Joyce Belter, and that the additional
filing fee therefor be waived.
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: In order to participate in this appeal, you must
enter an appearance in the Vermont Environmental Court within twenty (20) days of receiving
1 The first paragraph of the July 7 Decision refers to NV-08-06; however, the upper -right corner of the
original Notice of Violation is marked "NV-08-07."
'.ANGROCK SPt?RRY
& we""_ r,r.Y 2 The property in issue, referred to in the July 7 Decision as 102 Ethan Allen Drive, is adjacent to the
Belters' 2 Country Club Drive property, and is likewise adjacent to property owned by Terry & Bethany
Lieberman, known and designated as 44 Country Club Drive.
this Notice of Appeal. Notices of Appearance should be mailed to: Jacalyn Fletcher, Court
Manager, Vermont Environmental Court, 2418 Airport Road, Barre, VT, 05641-8701.
466034.0
'-ANGROCK. SPLIII,,Y
& WOOL Iff P
DATED at Burlington, Vermont this 17th day of July, 2007.
LANGROCK SPERRY & WOOL, L P
Mark L. Sperry
Hobart F. Popick
210 College Street — P.O. Box 721
Burlington, VT 05402
(802) 864-0217
Attorneys for John and Joyce Belter.
2
#AO-08-06
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
JOHN BELTER - 102 ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE
APPEAL #AO-08-06
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
John Belter, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, appeals the decisions of the
Administrative Officer in Notice of Violation #NV-08-06, 102 Ethan Allen Drive.
The Development Review Board held a public hearing on Tuesday, June 3, 2008. Mark
Sperry, Esq. represented the appellant.
Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and
supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development
Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On April 23, 2008, the Administrative Officer mailed via Certified Mail Return Receipt,
a Notice of Violation dated April 16, 2008, to John Belter for a zoning violation at 102
Ethan Allen Drive (#NV-08-06 — EXHIBIT 1).
2. The Notice of Violation described the violation as: "Altered the existing grade of your
above referenced property in the vicinity of 44 Country Club Drive by placing or allowing
to be placed fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil or other similar material in an amount equal
to or greater than 20 cubic yards without approval of the Development Review Board
and a zoning permit".
3. A Notice of Appeal (#AO-08-06) was filed on 4/29/08 by John Belter (EXHIBIT 2),
hereinafter referred to as "Appellant", appealing the Administrative Officer's
determination in Notice of Violation #NV-08-06.
4. A public notice on the appeal was published in Seven Days on May 14, 2008
(EXHIBIT 3).
5. The fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material placed on the Appellant's
property by Terry & Bethany Lieberman is depicted on a plan entitled, "Topographic
Survey for Terry & Bethany Lieberman 44 Country Club Drive So. Burlington, Vermont",
prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors, Inc., last revised on March 14, 2008 (EXHIBIT 4).
The Liebermans' agent informed the Administrative Officer that the Liebermans placed
approximately 200 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material
on the Belters' property.
-1 -
#AO-08-06
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations requires approval of the
Development Review Board for the placement of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil,
or other similar material equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards (EXHIBIT 6).
2. No one has obtained approval from the Development Review Board for the
placement of more than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other
similar material on Appellant's property.
3. Section 17.02 of the Land Development Regulations states, in relevant part, that
"no land development may be commenced within the area affected by these
regulations without a zoning permit issued by the Administrative Officer"
(EXHIBIT 7). The definition of "land development" includes "[tjhe construction,
reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation or enlargement of any
building or other structure, or of any mining, excavation or landfill ..." See
Article 2 of the Land Development Regulations. Since land development has
taken place on the 102 Ethan Allen Drive property without a zoning permit, the
Beard concludes that Appellant is in violation of the Land Development
Regulations and 24 V.S.A. section 4449(a)(1).
4. No one has applied for or obtained a zoning permit for the placement of more
than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material on
Appellant's property. Since no zoning permit has been issued for placement of
fill by the appellants on the 102 Ethan Allen Drive property, the Board concludes
that Appellant is in violation of the Land Development Regulations and 24 V.S.A.
section, 4449(a)(1).
DECISION
Motion by seconded by/#I Y6W i✓%Ci�t 1N6�/U/ to uphold
Belter, 102 Ethan Allen Drive.
the decisions o the Administrat e Officer in Notice of Violation #NV-08-07 to John
Mark Behr —"nay/abs in/not present
Matthew Birmingham — knay/abstain/not present
John Dinklage — bstain/not present
Roger Farley — e �ay7a
y/abstain/not r ent
Eric Knudsen — yea/nay/abstain of resen
Peter Plumeau — /nay/abstain of present
Gayle Quimby ye ay/abstain/not present
Motion carried by a vote of
-2-
#AO-08-06
Signed this
8, by
Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental
Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRECP 5 in writing, within 30 days of the date this
decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to
challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long.
You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy;
finality).
-3-
IN RE: Appeal Joyce Belter of Notice of Environmental Court
Violation for Fill Placement. Docket No.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
NOW COMES Respondent Joyce Belter, by her attorneys, Langrock Sperry & Wool,
LLP, and, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4471, hereby appeals to the Environmental Court the July
7, 2008 decision of the City of South Burlington Development Review Board in Notice of
Violation #NV-08-08 (the "July 7 Decision"), upholding a Notice of Violation for fill
placement on property owned by John and Joyce Belter at 102 Ethan Allen Drive, South
Burlington, Vermont. (Copy of July 7 Decision attached hereto.) Joyce Belter's residence
and mailing address is: 2 Country Club Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 05403.1
This appeal is related to the Appeal ofJohn Belter of Notice of Violation for Fill
Placement, filed herewith, which arises out of identical facts and circumstances concerning
the placement of fill on the 102 Ethan Allen Drive property and the adjacent 44 Country Club
Drive property, owned by Terry and Bethany Lieberman. Accordingly, Appellant requests
that the instant appeal be consolidated with the Appeal of John Belter, and that the additional
filing fee therefor be waived.
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: In order to participate in this appeal, you must
enter an appearance in the Vermont Environmental Court within twenty (20) days of receiving
this Notice of Appeal. Notices of Appearance should be mailed to: Jacalyn Fletcher, Court
Manager, Vermont Environmental Court, 2418 Airport Road, Barre, VT, 05641-8701.
DATED at Burlington, Vermont this 17th day of July, 2007.
RNGROCK SP1'.R1tY
& W(Iov L.LP
LANGROCK SPERRY
& WOOL LLP
LANGROCK SPERRY & WOOL, LLP
All
Mark L. Sperry
Hobart F. Popick
210 College Street — P.O. Box 721
Burlington, VT 05402
(802) 864-0217
Attorneys for John and Joyce Belter.
466027M
1 The property in issue, referred to in the July 7 Decision as 102 Ethan Allen Drive, is adjacent to the
Belters' 2 Country Club Drive property, and is likewise adjacent to property owned by Terry & Bethany
Lieberman, known and designated as 44 Country Club Drive.
2
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
JOYCE BELTER - 102 ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE
APPEAL #AO-08-07
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
Joyce Belter, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, appeals the decisions of the
Administrative Officer in Notice of Violation #NV-08-08, 102 Ethan Allen Drive.
The Development Review Board he!d a public hearing on Tuesday, June 3, 2008. Mark
Sperry, Esq. represented the appellant.
Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and
supporting materials contained in the document file for this annii(-of r, +k- -,_
Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: rr.. ,,�, "c `jCVelOpment
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On April 23, 2008, the Administrative Officer mailed via Certified Mail Return
Receipt, a Notice of Violation dated April 16, 2008, to Joyce Belter for a zoning
violation at 102 Ethan Allen Drive (#NV-08-07 - EXHIBIT 1).
2. The Notice of Violation described the violation as: "Altered the existing grade of
your above referenced property in the vicinity of 44 Country Club Drive by placing
or allowing to be placed fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil or other similar material in
an amount equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards without approval of the
Development Review Board and a zoning permit".
3. A Notice of Appeal (#AO-08-07) was filed on 4/29/08 by Joyce Belter (EXHIBIT
2), hereinafter referred to as "Appellant", appealing the Administrative Officer's
determination in Notice of Violation #NV-08-08.
4. A public notice on the appeal was published in Seven Days on May 14, 2008
(EXHIBIT 3).
5. The fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material placed on the
Appellant's property by Terry & Bethany Lieberman is depicted on a plan entitled,
"Topographic Survey for Terry & Bethany Lieberman 44 Country Club Drive So.
Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors, Inc., last revised on
March 14, 2008 (EXHIBIT 4). The Liebermans' agent informed the
Administrative Officer that the Liebermans placed approximately 200 cubic yards
of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material on the Belters'
property.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations requires approval of the
Development Review Board for the placement of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil,
or other similar material equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards (EXHIBIT 6).
2. No one has obtained approval from the Development Review Board for the
placement of more than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other
similar material on Appellant's property.
3. Section 17.02 of the Land Development Regulations states, in relevant part, that
"no land development may be commenced within the area affected by these
regulations without a zoning permit issued by the Administrative Officer"
(EXHIBIT 7). The definition of "land development" includes "[tjhe construction,
reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation or enlargement of any
building or other structure, or of any mining, excavation or landfill ..." See
Article 2 of the Land Development Regulations. Since land development has
taken place on the 102 Ethan Allen Drive property without a zoning permit, the
Board concludes that the Appellant is in violation of the Land Development
Regulations and 24 V.S.A. section 4449(a)(1).
4. No one has applied for or obtained a zoning permit for the placement of more
than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material on
Appellant's property. Since no zoning permit has been issued for placement of
fill by the appellants on the 102 Ethan Allen Drive property, the Board concludes
that the Appellant is in violation of the Land Development Regulations and 24
V.S.A. section 4449(a)(1).
9of
DEC-- CISION
thetdecbY « ��� seconded by��� 111�19
%LNG to uphold
p
decisione Administrativ Officer to issue Notice of Violation #NV-08-08, 102
Ethan Allen Drive.
Mark Behr - ye /nay/ab in/not present
Matthew Birmingh — eWnay/abstain/not present
John Dinklage /nay/abstain/not present
Roger Farley — e nay/abstain/not resent
Eric Knudsen — yea/nay/abstain not re
Peter Plumeau — /nay/abstain not rese
Gayle Quimby — 0eaay/abstain/not present
Motion carried by a vote of
Signed this -7- day of 2008, by
John Dinklage )Chair
Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental
Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRECP 5 in writing, within 30 days of the date this
decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to
challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long.
You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy;
finality).
southbu!yngton
July 8, 2008
David Rugh, Esq.
Burak Anderson & Melloni
PO Box 787
Burlington, VT 05402-0787
Re: Appeal #AO-08-06 & Appeal #AO-08-07 - Belter
Dear Mr. Rugh:
Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review
Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of
this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office.
Sincerely,
130N�w,L
Betsy McDonough Brown
Planning & Zoning Assistant
574cr Street S m u IN 1tv rl i n I
gv-'N' Vr 50" 3 t t ii Ian: 861 04 .4'�'It
r
southburlington
PLANNING & ZONING
July 8, 2008
Mark Sperry, Esq.
Langrock Sperry & Wool
PO Box 721
Burlington, VT 05402-0721
Re: Appeal #AO-08-06 & Appeal #AO-08-07
Dear Mr. Sperry:
) 1�e1k'r -� U
Enclosed, please find the Findings of Fact and Decisions regarding the above referenced
appeals.
Should you have any questions, please contact our office.
Sincerely,
Betsy Donough Brown
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Encl.
CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 5782 "
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com
southb i aritington
P L A N 'N U i —&j a # i ft, in
July 8, 2008
Mark Sperry, Esq.
Langrock Sperry & Wool
PO Box 721
Burlington, VT 05402-0721
Re: Appeal #AO-08-08 Lieberman
Dear Mr. Sperry:
Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review
Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of
this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office.
Sincerely,
Betsy Mc onough Brown
Planning & Zoning Assistant
7's Dai4et' Straot 05403 lei fax 042.0415A4AAi wvawzbuO—Com
June 23, 2008
Mark Sperry, Esq.
Langrock Sperry & Wool
P.O. Box 721
Burlington, VT 05402-0721
Re: Minutes — 102 Ethan Allen Drive
Dear Mr. Sperry:
For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved June 3 Development Review
Board meeting minutes.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Betsy McDonough Brown
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Encl.
11 a sit S sr 0 e I Saual surlim qton, VT 05409 tad tax 802 fl"001 b c 0 M
June 23, 2008
David Rugh, Esq.
Burak Anderson & Melloni
PO Box 787
Burlington, VT 05402-0787
Re: Minutes — 102 Ethan Allen Drive
Dear Mr. Rugh:
For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved June 3, 2008 Development
Review Board meeting minutes.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Betsy McDonough Brown
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Encl.
6 ? 5 Gray 's s, 1, S, f, r v o t 5,;"Du 0Rus I z�l g '- Gil, V7 10 �40-3 I&I U12,14SAA6 lax UIUA'44,410! ,Fa-Yo ,,s , t, b ij T � , c v T,
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
3 JUNE 2008
13. Appeal #AO-08-06 of John Belter, appealing decision of the Administrative
Officer to issue Notice of Violation #NV-08-07 for alteration of existing grade
without a zoning permit, 102 Ethan Allen Drive: and
14. Appeal #AO-08-07 of Joyce Belter, appealing decision of the Administrative
Officer to issue Notice of Violation #NV-08-08 for alteration of existing grade
without a zoning permit, 102 Ethan Allen Drive:
Mr. Sperry, representing the Betters, said the next door neighbors placed more than 20
cubic yards of fill on the Better property without their knowledge or permission. The
Betters have sued the Liebermans for this asking them to pay to have the Betters remove
the fill. The Betters feel there should be an engineering study so they don't damage the
Lieberman house.
Mr. Sperry also noted that there is a city easement for a stormwater pipe and that fill was
placed over that. The Betters don't want to damage that and want enough fill left to
protect the pipe.
Mr. Sperry felt the Betters should not be served with a Notice of Violation because of
something they didn't do or approve.
Mr. Belair said he placed the Betters in violation because their grade has been altered
without DRB approval and without a zoning permit. He recognized that they didn't place
the fill there, but it is on their land.
Mr. Anderson, representing the Liebermans, said the city's pipe is not in the area of the
fill. He noted that in order to remove the fill, there has to be a permit because the fill on
the Better property supports fill on the Lieberman property. He said the Betters refuse to
get any permit. Mr. Anderson said he felt Mr. Belair was right in issuing a violation
against the Betters.
Mr. Anderson agreed the situation is very complex and is further complicated by the fact
that the Liebermans have brought action against the builder of their house for putting it in
the wrong place.
Members agreed to close the hearing and hold a deliberative session with input from the
City Attorney.
M
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
3 JUNE 2008
Ms. Quimby moved to close the hearing. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed
unanimously.
15. Appeal #AO-08-08 of Terry & Bethany Lieberman, appealing decision of the
Administrative Officer to issue Notices of Violation #NV-08-09 and NV-08-10 for
alteration of existing grade without a zoning permit, 102 Ethan Alle Drive:
Mr. Anderson said the Lieberman's house was built in the wrong place, so it results in
setback encroachments. The Liebermans placed the fill where they thought it was legal.
Mr. Dinklage said that if they were just filling to the property line, there shouldn't have
been so many feet of fill. Mr. Rugh said the house was built far to the north from where it
is shown on the plan.
Mr. Anderson said they have been trying to find a solution. He noted there are 3 more
zoning issues and several lawsuits involved, and they are pursuing all options.
Mr. Belair said he issued the notices of violation for putting fill on the Belter property.
Mr. Sperry said they need an engineering opinion of what the bank would look like if the
fill is removed.
Members agreed to close the hearing and deliberate with City Attorney input.
Ms. Quimby moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed
unanimously.
As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at
9:00 P.M.
Aa 0 2
Clerk
Date
7-
I
PLANNING & ZONING
MEMORANDUM
To: Development Review Board
From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer
Date: May 29, 2008
Re: Agenda Item # 15, Appeal #AO-08-08
1. On April 23, 2008, the Administrative Officer mailed via Certified Mail Return
Receipt, Notices of Violation dated April 16, 2008, to Terry & Bethany
Lieberman for a zoning violation at 102 Ethan Allen Drive (#NV-08-09 &
#NV-08-10 —EXHIBITS 1&2).
2. The Notices of Violation described the violation as: "Altered the existing grade
of your above referenced property in the vicinity of 44 Country Club Drive by
placing or allowing to be placed fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil or other similar
material in an amount equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards without approval
of the Development Review Board and a zoning permit".
3. A Notice of Appeal (#AO-08-08) was filed on 5/l/08 by Terry & Bethany
Lieberman (EXHIBIT 3), hereinafter referred to as "Appellants", appealing the
Administrative Officer's determination in Notices of Violation #NV-08-09 &
#NV-08-10.
4. A public notice on the appeal was published in Seven Days on May 14, 2008
(EXHIBIT 4).
The fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material placed on the
Appellant's property by Terry & Bethany Lieberman is depicted on a plan
entitled, "Topographic Survey for Terry & Bethany Lieberman 44 Country
Club Drive So. Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors,
Inc., last revised on March 14, 2008 (EXHIBIT 5). The Liebermans' agent
informed the Administrative Officer that the Liebermans placed approximately
200 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material on
the Belters' property.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com
6. Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations requires approval of the
Development Review Board for the placement of fill, gravel, sand, loam,
topsoil, or other similar material equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards
(EXHIBIT 6).
7. No one has obtained approval from the Development Review Board for the
placement of more than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or
other similar material on Appellant's property.
8. Section 17.02 of the Land Development Regulations states, in relevant part,
that "no land development may be commenced within the area affected by
these regulations without a zoning permit issued by the Administrative
Officer" (EXHIBIT 7). The definition of "land development" includes "[t]he
construction, reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation or
enlargement of any building or other structure, or of any mining, excavation or
landfill ..." See Article 2 of the Land Development Regulations (emphasis
added).
9. No one has applied for or obtained a zoning permit for the placement of more
than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material
on Appellant's property.
EXHIBIT
>9
southburhnaon
PLANNING & ZONING
April 23, 2008
Terry Lieberman
c/o David Rugh, Esq.
Burak Anderson & Melloni
PO Box 787
Burlington, VT 05402-0787
Re: Zoning Violation — 102 Ethan Allen Drive
Dear Mr. Rugh:
Please be advised that based on information available to the City, you have commenced
land development on property at the above address without obtaining a zoning permit
from the City as required by Section 17.02 of the Land Development Regulations and 24
VSA 4449 (a) (1). Specifically, you have initiated the following activities on the above -
described property.
Altered the existing grade of the above referenced property in the vicinity of 44 Country
Club Drive by placing gravel, sand, loam, topsoil or other similar material in an amount
equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards without approval of the Development Review
Board and a zoning permit.
You have seven (7) days from the date of this letter to discontinue this violation and take
appropriate remedial action. Specifically, you must accomplish the following:
Either obtain all necessary approvals and permits for the grade alteration or remove all
fill material and return the site to it's original grade.
If you do not accomplish the actions directed in this letter within seven (7) days of the
date of this letter, the City may pursue this matter in court. In such court proceedings,
the City will be entitled to seek appropriate injunctive relief and fines of up to $100.00
per day for each day your violation continues beyond the seven (7) day period provided
in this letter.
If the violation described in this letter occurs within twelve (12) months of the date of
this letter, you will not be entitled to receive a further Notice of Violation from the City
before the City pursues further enforcement proceedings.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com
You may appeal this Notice of Violation to the Development Review Board by filing a
written notice of appeal (see enclosed) and one hundred eleven ($111) dollars within
fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter with the Clerk of the Development Review
Board at the following address: 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403.
g
elair
Administrative Officer
Encl.
CC: Amanda S. E. Lafferty, Esq.
Certified Mail Return Receipt # 7008 0150 0003 6150 5560
r
►� ~ ' EXHIBIT
southburlington
PLANNING & ZONING
April 23, 2008
Bethany Lieberman
c/o David Rugh, Esq.
Burak Anderson & Melloni
PO Box 787
Burlington, VT 05402-0787
Re: Zoning Violation — 102 Ethan Allen Drive
Dear Mr. Rugh:
Please be advised that based on information available to the City, you have commenced
land development on property at the above address without obtaining a zoning permit
from the City as required by Section 17.02 of the Land Development Regulations and 24
VSA 4449 (a) (1). Specifically, you have initiated the following activities on the above -
described property.
Altered the existing grade of the above. referenced property in the vicinity of 44 Country
Club Drive by placing gravel, sand, loam, topsoil or other similar material in an amount
equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards without approval of the Development Review
Board and a zoning permit.
You have seven (7) days from the date of this letter to discontinue this violation and take
appropriate remedial action. Specifically, you must accomplish the following:
Either obtain all necessary approvals and permits for the grade alteration or remove all
fill material and return the site to it's original grade.
If you do not accomplish the actions directed in this letter within seven (7) days of the
date of this letter, the City may pursue this matter in court. In such court proceedings,
the City will be entitled to seek appropriate injunctive relief and fines of up to $100.00
per day for each day your violation continues beyond the seven (7) day period provided
in this letter.
If the violation described in this letter occurs within twelve (12) months of the date of
this letter, you will not be entitled to receive a further Notice of Violation from the City
before the City pursues further enforcement proceedings.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com
You may appeal this Notice of Violation to the Development Review Board by filing a
written notice of appeal (see enclosed) and one hundred eleven ($111) dollars within
fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter with the Clerk of the Development Review
Board at the following address: 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403.
In
Encl.
CC: Amanda S. E. Lafferty, Esq.
Certified Mail Return Receipt # 7008 0150 0003 6150 5997
EXHIBIT
CITY OF SO
UTH' BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
Application #AO
NOTICE OF APPEAL
All information requested below must be completed in full. Failure to provide the
requested information on this notice will result in rejection of our application and delay
in the review of the appeal before the Development Review Board.
understand:
• the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning
& Development Act);
• that the Development Review Board holds regular meetings twice a month;
• that a legal advertisement must appear ppear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to
the hearing on my appeal.
• 1 agree to pay a fee of $111 Jo offset the cost of the hearing on my appeal.
1) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPELLANT(S): '
Terry and Bet-hnni, Lieberman, c/o David W. Rugh, Esq., Burak Anderson
& Melloni, PLC, P.O. Box 787, Burlington, VT 05402-0787
2) LOCATION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AT ISSUE IN THIS
APPEAL:
Property northerly of 44 Country Club'Drive, at what is known as
102 Ethan Allen Drive
3) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING?
Zoning Violation letter, dated April 23, 2008
- 1 -
4) WHAT PROVISIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE
APPLICABLE TO THIS APPEAL, IF ANY?
Zoning Regulations section 3.12
5) WHAT RELIEF DO YOU WANT THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD TO
GRANT?
Grant a permit to leave fill or to remove
6) WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN NUMBER 5, ABOVE,
IS PROPER UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES?
The Zoning Regulations require it.
7) LIST ABUTTERS (LIST ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER NAMES AND
ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY THAT ABUTS THE PROPERTY
THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPEAL).
Janine Kirchgassner, 45 Country Club Drive
John and Joyce Belter, 2 Country Club Drive
Neil and Patricia Zoller, 46 Country Club Drive
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this notice of appeal has
been submitted and is curate to th st of my knowledge.
SIGNATURE OF APPELLANT
DATE
-2-
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
REVIEW AUTHORITY:
I have reviewed this Notice of Appeal and find it to be:
Complete--' incomplete
J
uuecior or running & Zoning or Designee Date
-3-
EXHIBIT
�naa_ SVILCOM [clic
(Dpen 24/7/365.
Post& browse ads
at your ;convenier;ice
2lication and proposed (?riot to convening a hearing, District #,4 Coordinator PUBLIC HEARING 3. Appeal #AO-08-07 of Joyce.
may also be viewed on the the District Commission must . 11-1 West Street SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP getter, appealing decision of the
Resources Board's web determine that substantive is= Essex Junction, VT 05452 . MENT REVIEW BOARD Administrative Officer.to issue
Nw.n.rb.state.vt.us/lup) by sues requiring a hearing have T/ 802-879.5658 Notice Administrative
Violation er.t#NVo issue
for
I on "Act 250 Database," been raised. Findings .of Fact and ./ peter.keibel@state.vf.us 'The South Burlington Dev'elopmerii alteration of existing grade with-
ig "Entire Database," and Conclusions of Law will not be Review Board will hold a public out a zoning permit, 102 Ethan
g,.the "case number above. prepared unless the:Commission " Review Paring t the will hh.Burlpublic . Allen Drive.
re will ,held unless; on holds a" public hearing. CHARLOTTE PLANNING - City Hall Conference Room, 575
re May 27; 2008 a party COMMISSION ` Dorset Street,: South Burlington, 4.'Appeal #AO -OS 08 of,Terry &
the District Commission` Should a hearing behold on this NOTICE -,OF PUBLIC HEARING .: Vermont on Tuesday, June 3,, Bethany Lieberman, appealing de
sue or issues: requiring project and you have a disability : 2008'at 7:30 P.M. to consider the, cision of the Administrative Off'ict
;entation of'evidenco at for which you are going to need Pursuant to Title 24 Chapter 117 following: to issue Notices of Violation # NV
1g or the commission sets accommodation, please notify us. V.S.A. 'and the_Chartotte Land 08-0g & N tires 0 for alteration
ter for hearing on .its .: by May 27, 2008, Use, Regulation$,"the Charlotte 1. Condiiionalwse application of existing grade without a zonin
ition."Any hearing ,request Planning.Commission will meet #CU 08 03 of South Burlington
in writing to the address Parties• entitled to participate :are on Thursday June 5,.200.8at the . School District see9 permit, 102 Ethan.Allen Drive:.
king. permission ;halGstate.the, criteria or � the Municipality, -the Municipal'. Town.Hill. to: hear the following. to install four (4) 80 foot high. • :• John Dinklage, Chairman
tria'at issue' why a hearing Planning Commission,. the Re- application: , . pole lights,.550. Dorset Street. South Burlington :Development
red and what additional gionaCPlanning Commission, Review Board
e will be 'presented at adjoining property owners, 'other' 8:30 P.M.Final PLat.Hearing of 2.. Appeal. #AO-08-06 of John ring. Any hearing request interested persons granted party Clark Hinsdale III and Meg Berlin Belter, appealing decision of the Copies of -the applications are
djoining property owner . status, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § for a subdivision modification to Administrative Officer to issue available for, public inspection at
interested. person must. 6085.(c). Non-party participants change. boundary lines'of adjacent . Notice of Violation#NV 08,07 for the South BurlingtonCity Hall: .
a petition forparty,status. .. may also be allowed under 10 properties at 1251 Greenbush alteration of existing grade with -
.submitting a :request for. V.S.A. §:6085(c)(5). Road out a zoning permit, 302 Ethan May 14, 2008
ig, please contact the.dis- Allen Drive.
)rdinator at the telephone Dated in Essex Junction Vermont, Applicatibn maferiat can be STATE OF VERMONT
Non.
{fisted below forbore . this 2nd day of May 2008. viewed at the Planning and Zoning " :DISTRICT OF CHITTENDEN
Office. Participation in the hearing PROBATE COURT
/s/ Peter E:.keibel is a, prerequisite to the right to
Peter E. Keibel .DOCKET N0. 32397.
appeaCany decision related to. .
Natural Resources Board these applications." IN RE THE FSTATE.OF
Geraldine M. LaPlant
LATE OF SO.. BURLINGTON, VT.
l COMPREHENS.IVEOEVELOPME NT ORDINANCE - NOTICE T°CREDITORS
To the creditors of the estate of
Itlstlt. onal ZO.ning #ZA-08-01 - Geraldine M. LaPlant late of Soutl
Burlington.
That the Comprehensive Development Ordinance of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Burlington be and hereby is
amended by arilending Sections 4,4.4, 4.5.2 and:Appendix B asset forth in the document attached hereto. I have been appointed as person
representative .of.the above.name
estate. All creditors having claim: ZONING AMEND.MENT•
against the estate must present
Burlington Comprehensive be Ordinance. ZA-08-01 re: Institutioncfl Zoning Districts their claims in writing .within fou
;ec. 4.4.4 Institutional District months of the first publication .
of this notice. The claim must be
a ebl 4
.4.4-1 Dimensional"Standards and Density,•
listricts
Max Intensity
Max Lot Coverage'
Building Se#backs' (feet)
Max
Front?.. Side2., Rears
Height',"
1Stltutlonal;
20du/dc,.
40%.
Minimum: IN oflotwidth.25%oflotdepth.
35'
(24 du/acre with .
(48% with
154eet . Miw-S-feet Min: zO feet
.
.inclusionary req)
nc
ilusonary req.) i-
Max: 20 feet
a -Max.Max75-feet
.
I —Measurement of and exceptions to coverage; setback and height standards are found in Art S.
! The calculation of the front yard 'ss. etback shall be a percentage of lot width and depth or as defined:and described in Art S.
- Maximum allowable lot coverage, setbacks and buildfng'heightin portions of this district may be modified by the provisions of the lnstitutionaLCoreiampus
Overlays in Sec:,4.6.2
presented to me at the address
listed below with a copy filed wit
the register of the Probate Court.
The claim wilt be forever,barred
if it is not presented as describec
'within the four - month deadline.
Dated.: May.I., 2008
Signed: Robert J. Perry
Address:. PO Box 238 .
Burlington, VT 05402
802-658-2675
Name of Publications '
Seven Days
.First Publication Date: 5/1/08
C 4 5 2 institutional Core Campus OV2rldy DlstrlCtS Second Publication Date: 5/14/0
Distort Speufiic Regulations: Fletcher Aflen Health Care Campus (ICC-FANG) and UVMMain fampus(ICC-UVM);
Budding Height Address of Probate Court:
ling hiighis6llbejiieiisured under the provisions of Art. 5 exceptthat.the-Measurement'nterval method specified in Sec 5.2.5(a)(3)shall not a I.Exce tforornamentaland Probate Court, District of.Chit-
solic archite''d4Q features, additions and new construction may be built to a height that -does not exceed the lesser of. . PP y P tenden
A Theadual heightofthe tallest existing structure as of January t, 2007 and located within the respective institutions core rani us PO Box 511
lay district or, P Burlington, VT 05402
- B. The elevation ofa. plane running parallel to sealevel from a point defined by the roof of the tallest structute at the highest
elevation wtheparcel as depictedas of January 1, 2000.
Density
N3� s2ss E JOHN H. & JOYCE N. BEL TER, JR.
6, 00, \\
311
z \\
Q
I24rRE$ 51.4' 230.
LOT 48A i C DAR \ \\
MLLIAM & MELINDA COOPER \---3s
1 DECK
-- \�-240
# 42 20 I \ LOT 48 DECK o
EXIS77NG HOUSE pal
SETBACK AVC. ROOF HT.= 274'
I LINES AVG.GRD.= 247' 1G kQ
DIFT. -27'
\W
\ o_
APPLE
l0" TREES
O
STEPS wrH
Z GIs' OVERHANG \2
S5439'W
s
LEGEND
IRON PIPE —ROD FOUND
1" IRON PIPE TO BE SET
GAS LINE AS MARKED IN FIELD
POWER LINE AS MARKED IN FIELD
SEWER LINE
WATER VA VE
EXHIBIT
LOT 47
NEIL & PATRICIA LOLLER
VOL. 432 PG.431
1 4 122. 75 - w \ \
ID
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
s s s s s s s— SO
60 FT. RIGHT OF WAY
0
o
REFER TO SURVEY PLAT ENTITLED BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
FOR JANE EVANS HARROCK" PREPARED BY VERMONT LAND
SURVEYORS, INC. DATED 4121104 & 4126104 AND RECORDED
ON SLIDE #436.
SCALE : 1 INCH = 20 FEET
0 20 40 60 80 100
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR
TERRY & BETHANY LIEBERMAN
44 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT
VERMONT LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
4050 WILLISTON ROAD, SUITE 112
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT.. 05403-6063
(802) 862-5661
DATE AUG. 16, 2007, MARCH 14, 2008
SURVEYED M. W. & B.H.
DRAWN MARK V. WARD PROJECT
2717A
�CHIBIT
ARTICLE
GENERAL PROVISIONS
65
total of six (6) months in a one year period, any future use of such land shall
be in compliance with all provisions of these Regulations.
3.12 Alteration of Existing Grade
A. Permit Required. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel,
sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty
(20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a
structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the Development Review Board. The
Development Review Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested
in connection with the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision
plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a
resource extraction operation (see Section 13.16, Earth Products.)
B. Standards and Conditions for Approval
(i) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for
compliance with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). and
Section 3.07, Height of Structures of these regulations. An application under
Section 3.12(A) above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit
development or subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or
removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or
addition of material.
(2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any
conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time.
(b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the
conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting,
fencing, drainage, and other appropriate measures.
(c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure
compliance with the provisions of this Section.
(d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under
Section 3.07, Height of Structures.
3.13 General Performance and Maintenance Standards
A. Purpose of Performance Standards Consistent with the general purposes of
these regulations, performance standards (see Appendix A) shall set specific controls on
potentially objectionable external aspects of such non-residential uses so as to:
(1) Reduce to a reasonable minimum the dissemination of smoke, gas, dust, odor,
or other atmospheric pollutant outside the structure or beyond the property
boundaries in which the use is conducted.
South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective February 6, 2007
ARTICLE 17 ADMINISTRATION and ENFORCEMENT
17 ADMINISTRATION and ENFORCEMENT
17.01 General Provisions
17.02 Zoning Permits
17.03 Certificates of Occupancy
17.04 Expiration of Permits and Approvals
17.05 Revocation of Permits and Approvals
17.o6 Fees
17.07 Planning Commission
17.o8 Development Review Board
17.og Design Review Committee
17.10 Amendments to Regulations and Maps
17.11 Violations
17.12 Penalties
17.13 Appeals
17.oi General Provisions
A. Applicability of Vermont Planning and Development Act
234
EXHIBIT
Administration and enforcement of these regulations, the effect of the adoption of these
regulations, the appointment and powers of the Administrative Officer, the appointment
and powers of the Development Review Board, the requirement for zoning permits and
certificates of occupancy/compliance, penalties and remedies, administration and finance,
public notice, appeals and granting of variances and other related provisions of Chapter 117
and Title 24, Vermont Statutes Annotated, known as the Vermont Planning and
development Act, shall be applicable to these regulations, as such provisions now provide or
may hereafter be amended. [reserved]
17.02 Zoning Permits
A. Zoning Permit Required. No land development may be commenced within the
area affected by these regulations without a zoning permit issued by the Administrative
Officer. No zoning permit may be issued by the Administrative Officer except in
conformance with these regulations and the provisions of the Vermont Planning and
Development Act. Any applicant for a zoning permit shall provide the Administrative
Officer with any and all information the Administrative Officer deems necessary to
ascertain compliance with these zoning regulations. Such permit shall not be effective until
the time for appeal has expired, or such appeal has been adjudicated, in accordance with
the Vermont Planning and development Act.
17.03 Certificates of Occupancy
A. Certificate of Occupancy Required It shall be unlawful to use, occupy or
permit the use or occupancy of any land or structure or part thereof created, erected,
changed, converted, or wholly or partly altered or enlarged in its use or structure until a
certificate of occupancy has been issued therefor by the Administrative Officer.
South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective February 6, 2007
soutk
PLANNING & ZONING
MEMORANDUM
To: Development Review Board
From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer br
Date: May 29, 2008
Re: Agenda Item # 14, Appeal #AO-08-07
I. On April 23, 2008, the Administrative Officer mailed via Certified Mail Return
Receipt, a Notice of Violation dated April 16, 2008, to Joyce Belter for a zoning
violation at 102 Ethan Allen Drive (#NV-08-08 — EXHIBIT 1).
2. The Notice of Violation described the violation as: "Altered the existing grade
of your above referenced property in the vicinity of 44 Country Club Drive by
placing or allowing to be placed fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil or other similar
material in an amount equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards without approval
of the Development Review Board and a zoning permit".
3. A Notice of Appeal (#AO-08-07) was filed on 4/29/08 by Joyce Belter
(EXHIBIT 2), hereinafter referred to as "Appellant", appealing the
Administrative Officer's determination in Notice of Violation #NV-08-08.
4. A public notice on the appeal was published in Seven Days on May 14, 2008
(EXHIBIT 3).
5. The fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material placed on the
Appellant's property by Terry & Bethany Lieberman is depicted on a plan
entitled, "Topographic Survey for Terry & Bethany Lieberman 44 Country
Club Drive So. Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors,
Inc., last revised on March 14, 2008 (EXHIBIT 4). The Liebermans' agent
informed the Administrative Officer that the Liebermans placed approximately
200 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material on
the Belters' property.
6. Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations requires approval of the
Development Review Board for the placement of fill, gravel, sand, loam,
topsoil, or other similar material equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards
(EXHIBIT 5).
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com
7. No one has obtained approval from the Development Review Board for the
placement of more than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or
other similar material on Appellant's property.
8. Section 17.02 of the Land Development Regulations states, in relevant part,
that "no land development may be commenced within the area affected by
these regulations without a zoning permit issued by the Administrative
Officer" (EXHIBIT 6). The definition of "land development" includes "[t]he
construction, reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation or
enlargement of any building or other structure, or of any mining, excavation or
landfill ..." See Article 2 of the Land Development Regulations (emphasis
added).
9. No one has applied for or obtained a zoning permit for the placement of more
than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material
on Appellant's property.
EXHIBIT
April 16, 2008
Joyce Belter
2 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Re: Zoning Violations — 102 Ethan Allen Drive
Dear Mrs. Belter:
Please be advised that based on information available to the City, you have commenced
land development on your property at the above address without obtaining a zoning
permit from the City as required by Section 17.02 of the Land Development Regulations
and 24 VSA 4449 (a) (1). Specifically, you have initiated the following activities on the
above -described property.
Altered the existing grade of your above referenced property in the vicinity of 44 Country
Club Drive by placing or allowing to be placed fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil or other
similar material in an amount equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards without approval of
the Development Review Board and a zoning permit.
You have seven (7) days from the date of this letter to discontinue this violation and take
appropriate remedial action. Specifically, you must accomplish the following:
Either obtain all necessary approvals and permits for the grade alteration or remove all
fill material and return the site to it's original grade.
If you do not accomplish the actions directed in this letter within seven (7) days of the
date of this letter, the City may pursue this matter in court. In such court proceedings,
the City will be entitled to seek appropriate injunctive relief and fines of up to $100.00
per day for each day your violat
in this letter. ion continues beyond the seven (7) day period provided
If the violation described in this letter occurs within twelve (12) months of the date of
this letter, you will not be entitled to receive a further Notice of
before the City pursueViolation from the City
s further enforcement proceedings.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com
You may appeal this Notice of Violation to the Development Review Board by filing a
written notice of appeal (see enclosed) and one hundred eleven ($111) dollars within
fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter with the Clerk of the Development Review
Board at the following address: 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403.
Encl.
CC: Amanda S. E. Lafferty, Esq.
Mark Sperry, Esq.
Certified Mail Return Receipt # 7008 0150 0003 6150 5553
04/24/08 16.26 FAX 802 864 013' � Langrock,Sperry&JVuo1 Bur
EXHIBIT
Application #AO - -
NOTICE OF APPEAL
All information requested below must be completed in full. Failure to provide the
requested information on this notice will result in rejection of your application and delay
in the review of the appeal before the Development Review Board.
I understand--
* the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning
& Development Act);
that the Development Review Board holds regular meetings twice a month;
that a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to
the hearing on my appeal.
I agree to pay a fee of $110 to offset the cost of the hearing on my appeal.
1) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPELLANT(S)=
Joyce Belter, 2 Country Club Dr., South Burlington
2) LOCATION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AT ISSUE IN THIS
APPEAL:
Country Club Drive, northeasterly of Lieberman property
3) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING?
Notice of Violation dated April 16, 2008
-1-
U 003
16: 26 FAX 802 864 0137 � Langrock, Sperry&1Vool Bur 1jfl i. 04
4) WHAT PROVISIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE
APPLICABLE TO THIS APPEAL, IF ANY?
Section 312(A), Section 17.02, 24 V.S.A. 4449(a)(1), 24 V.S.A. 4451(a)
5) WHAT RELIEF DO YOU WANT THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD TO
GRANT?
RavarSe cif Zoning .Administra.tor as to violation.
8) WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN NUMBER 5, ABOVE,
IS PROPER UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES?
Landowner did not place fill on property. Fill placed there by
Liebermans without landOwneTgv consent or knowledge. This sloes
not constitute a violation.
7) LIST ABUTTERS (LIST ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER NAMES AND
ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY THAT ABUTS THE PROPERTY
THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPEAL).
Terry and Bethany Lieberman.
21 Johnson Circle
North Andover MA 01845
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this notice of appeal has
been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
SIONATURE-OF APPELLANT
Joyce Baiter
DATE
-2-
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
REVIEW AUTHORITY:
I have reviewed this Notice of Appeal and find it to be:
Complete
Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date
-3-
EXHIBIT naaysvc.com [clic
os
open 24/7/365.
Post & browse a
6 $.. ads
at your ;convenience.
�lication and proposed .. Prior to convening a",hearing, : District #,4 Coordinator. PUBLIC HEARING
may also be viewed on the the District Commission must . 111 West Street 3• Appeat #AO-08-07 of Joyce.
Resources Board's web determine that substantive is= Essex Junction, VT 05452 . SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- Better, appealing decision of the
ww.nrb.state-vt.us lu b sues re urrin a hearin have T/ 802-879-5658 MENT REVIEW BOARD Administrative Officer.to issue
/ ,P) y i g g Notice of Violation #NV-08-08 for
i on "Act 2 Databasen been raised. Findings .of Fact and E% peter.keibel@state.vt.us 'The South Burlin ton Dev"elo ment" alteration of existing ig."Entire Database,"and Conclusions of Law wit L not be g p g grade with
g.the "case number above. prepared unless the:Commission Review Board will hold.a public out a zoning permit, 102 Ethan
ing wilt be held unless; on holds a! public hearin . hearing at the South. Allen Drive.
re May 27; 2008, a party . g _ CHARLOTTE PLANNING City Hall Conference Room, 575 "
COMMISSION Dorset Street,: South Burlington, 4. "Appea( #AO-08-08,of.Terry &
the Dtstrict Commission ` Should a hearing be held on this " NOTICE•,OF PUBLIC HEARING
:sue or issues: requiring project and you have a disability Vermont on Tuesday, June 31Bethany Lieberman, appealing de'
sentation of evidence at for which you are goingao need Pursuantto Title 24 Chapter 117, follow Wan 7:30 P.M. to consider the, cision of the Administrative Office
3g or the commission sets' accommodation, please notify. us.' V.S.A. 'and the_Charlotte Land g to issue'Notices of Violatio0 # NV
_ter for"hearing on its by May 27, 2008. 08-04 & NV-08-10 for alteration
ition.-Any hearing lequest Use ReguLations,ahe Charlotte 1. CondibonaLuse a lication of existing
Planning .Commission will meet PP g grade'without a zonin;
in writing tothe address Parties -entitled. to paficipate..are on Thursday June 5,. 2008 at the . School District seeking Burlington permit, 162 Ethan.ALlen Drive:.
shall state. the. criteria or the Municipality, the Municipal. Town Hall to hear the following, . to instal( four (4) 80 foot high ��n" John Dinklage, Chairman
!ria'at issue' why a. hearing Planning Commission,. the Re- application: , .
red and what additional gionat Planning Commission, pole lights,.550,D.orset Street. South Burlington Development
e will be presented at adjoining property'owners, other" 8:30 PM.Final Plat Hearing of 2. Appeal, #AO-08-06 of John Review Board
ling. Any hearing request interested persons granted party Clark Hinsdale III and Meg Berlin Better, appealing" decision of the Copies of the applications are
r inte es property owner . status, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § for a subdivision modification to Administrative Officer to issue available for public inspection at
r interested person must 6083.(c). Non-party participants change .boundarylines'of adjacent . Notice of Violation for the South. Burlington City Hall.
a petition. for party.status may also be allowed under 10 properties at 1251 Greenbush alteration of existing grade with- ,
submitinga;requestfor. V.S.A.§:6085(c}(5). Road
ig, please contact the.dis- out a zoning permit, 102 Ethan May 14, 2008 '
Drdinator at the telephone .. Dated in Essex Junction Vermont, -Application material can be Allen Drive..
listed below for more this 2nd day of -May 2008. viewed'at the Planning and Zoning STATE OF VERMONT
tion. Office. Participation in the hearing DISTRICT OF CHITTENDEN
/s/Peter E:•Keibel is a -prerequisite to the right to PROBATE COURT
Peter E: Keibel appeal any decision related to . DOCKET N0. 32397. "
NaturaL Resources Board these applications.. "
IN RE THE ESTATE OF
Geraldine`M. LaPlant
LATE OF SO.. BURLINGTON, VT .
COMPRE HENSIVE DEVELOPM.ENT:ORDIN "°TI`ET°`R°IT°RS
A N CE To the creditors of the estate of
instittatignai Zoning #ZA-O$701 Geraldine M. La.Plant late of Soutl
That the Comprehensive Development Ordinance of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Burlington be and hereby is Burlington.
amended by amending Sections,4,4,4, 4.5 2 and;Appendix B as set forth in the document attached hereto. I have been appointed as person
representative.of.the ;above name
ZONIN6 AMENDMENT. estate, ALL creditors having claim:
Burlington Comprehensive Development Ordinance ZA-0.8-01 re: Institut►ondl Zoning Districts their claims ainst the entate must writing within fou
>ec. 4.4.41nstitutional District months of the first publication .
of this notice. The claim must be
able 4 4.4 =1 Dimensional -Standards and Density , presented to me at the address
listrids listed below with, a copy filed wit
Max. Intensity Kok- LotCuverage' Building Setbacks' (feet) ' " Max the register of the Probate Court.
Front? . Side' . �` ` Rear' Height' The claim. Witt be forever,barred
nstitutlona13 . 20 du/dc if it is not presented as describec
40% Minimum: 10%oflotwidth . 25%of lot depth. 35� within the four month deadline.
(24 du/acre with (48% with 154eet Min S-feet Min: 20-feei
Inclusionary req.) inclusionary req.) Max•'20-feet Dated: MayI, 2008
Max:.
Signed: RobertJ. Perry
I -Measurement of and exceptions to coverage; setback and height standards are found in Art 5. Address: PO Box 238.
-. The calculation of the front yard setback shall be a percentage of lot width and depth or as defined and described in Art S. Burlington, VT 05402
802-658-2675
I -Maximum allowable lot coverage, setbacks and building height in portions of this district may be modified by the provisions of lnstitutional.Core`Campus OveriaystnSec.4.5.2 Name of Publication: '
Seven Days
First .Publication Date: 5/7/08 ""
G 4 5;2 institutional Core Campus OVerlav Districts Second Publication .Date: 5/14/0;
Drstnct specific Regulations: Fletcher Allen Health Care Campus (ICC FAHQ and UVM Main Campus.'(ICC-tJVM),
Budding Height Address of Probate Court:
ling heightshall bemeasured under the provisions of Art. 5 except thatthe.Measurement interval method specified in Sec 5.2.5(a)(3) shall not apply. Except for ornamental and Probate Court, District of Chit-
bolic architeet i4i features, additions and new construction maybe built to a heightthatUoes not exceed the lesser of:. tenden .
A The actual height of the tallest existing structure as of January 1, 2007 and located within the respective institutions corecani us PO Box 511
laydistrict;or, p Burlington, VT 05402
- 8. The elevation of a plane running parallel to sea levelfrom a,pointdefined by the roof of the tallest structure at the highest
elevation withintheparcel as depicted as of January 1, 2000.
Density '
4
EXHIBIT
JOHN H. & JOYCE N. BEL TER, JR. �P
00. \\
Z
I've
_ cn
� z4o, \ \
124TREE }--Q- 51.4' 230 20.0'
Q \\\C DAR
LOT 48A
WILLIAM & MELINDA COOPER
I 1 DECK \ \\ LOT 47
o� I �
# 42 °p \ LOT 48 DECK \ 0 \
14
EXIS77NG HOUSE 20 4 I ` 24'�\0� '
I SETBACK AVG.ROOF HT.= 274' \ R NEIL & PATRICIG. LOLLER
I LINES A✓G.GRD.= 247' VOL. 432 PG.431
DIFF. —27'
\� o
APPLE J
lollTREES6
/ S7FPS wrH
Fs OVERHANG 2
554 :39'W \ ¢
122.76
ti
COUNTRY CLUCK DRIVE
-s s s s s s s s
a 60 FT. RIGHT OF WAY
o �
0
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR
REFER TO SURVEY PLAT ENTITLED BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT TERRY & BETIYANY LIEBER11dAN
FOR JANE EVANS HARROCK" PREPARED BY VERMONT LAND
SURVEYORS, INC. DATED 4121104 & 4126104 AND RECORDED 44 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
ON SLIDE #436.
S0. BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LEGEND
VERMONT LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
IRON PIPE -ROD FOUND 0 SCALE i INCH = 20 FEET 4050 WILLISTON ROAD, SUITE 112
1" IRON PIPE TO BE SET • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT. 05403-6063
GAS LINE AS MARKED IN FIELD G (802) 862-5661
POWER LINE AS MARKED IN FIELD P
SEWER LINE S 0 20 40 60 80 100
WATER VALVE wv DATE AUG. 16, 2007, MARCH 14, 2008
SURVEYED M.W. & B.N.
DRAWN MARK V. WARD PROJECT
2717A
I
ARTICLE
GENERAL PROVISIONS
YHIBIT
-S-00,
65
total of six (6) months in a one year period, any future use of such land shall
be in compliance with all provisions of these Regulations.
3.12 Alteration of Existing Grade
A. Permit Required. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel,
sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty
(20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a
structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the Development Review Board. The
Development Review Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested
in connection with the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision
plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a
resource extraction operation (see Section 13.16, Earth Products.)
B. Standards and Conditions for Approval.
(1) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for
compliance with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). and
Section 3.07, Height of Structures of these regulations. An application under
Section 3.12(A) above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit
development or subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or
removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or
addition of material.
(2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any
conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time.
(b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the
conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting,
fencing, drainage, and other appropriate measures.
(c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure
compliance with the provisions of this Section.
(d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under
Section 3.07, Height of Structures.
3.i3 General Performance and Maintenance Standards
A. Purpose of Performance Standards. Consistent with the general purposes of
these regulations, performance standards (see Appendix A) shall set specific controls on
potentially objectionable external aspects of such non-residential uses so as to:
(1) Reduce to a reasonable minimum the dissemination of smoke, gas, dust, odor,
or other atmospheric pollutant outside the structure or beyond the property
boundaries in which the use is conducted.
South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective February 6, 2007
234
ARTICLE 17 ADMINISTRATION and ENFORCEMENT
EXHIBIT
17 ADMINISTRATION and ENFORCEMENT
17.o1 General Provisions
17.02 Zoning Permits
17.03 Certificates of Occupancy
17.04 Expiration of Permits and Approvals
17.05 Revocation of Permits and Approvals
17.o6 Fees
17.07 Planning Commission
17.o8 Development Review Board
17.og Design Review Committee
17.10 Amendments to Regulations and Maps
17.11 Violations
17.12 Penalties
17.13 Appeals
17.01 General Provisions
A. Applicability of Vermont Planning and Development Act.
Administration and enforcement of these regulations, the effect of the adoption of these
regulations, the appointment and powers of the Administrative Officer, the appointment
and powers of the Development Review Board, the requirement for zoning permits and
certificates of occupancy/compliance, penalties and remedies, administration and finance,
public notice, appeals and granting of variances and other related provisions of Chapter 117
and Title 24, Vermont Statutes Annotated, known as the Vermont Planning and
development Act, shall be applicable to these regulations, as such provisions now provide or
may hereafter be amended. [reserved]
17.02 Zoning Permits
A. Zoning Permit Required. No land development may be commenced within the
area affected by these regulations without a zoning permit issued by the Administrative
Officer. No zoning permit may be issued by the Administrative Officer except in
conformance with these regulations and the provisions of the Vermont Planning and
Development Act. Any applicant for a zoning permit shall provide the Administrative
Officer with any and all information the Administrative Officer deems necessary to
ascertain compliance with these zoning regulations. Such permit shall not be effective until
the time for appeal has expired, or such appeal has been adjudicated, in accordance with
the Vermont Planning and development Act.
17.03 Certificates of Occupancy
A. Certificate of Occupancy Required. It shall be unlawful to use, occupy or
permit the use or occupancy of any land or structure or part thereof created, erected,
changed, converted, or wholly or partly altered or enlarged in its use or structure until a
certificate of occupancy has been issued therefor by the Administrative Officer.
South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective February 6, 2007
MEMORANDUM
To: Development Review Board
From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer
Date: May 29, 2008
Re: Agenda Item # 13, Appeal #AO-08-06
1. On April 23, 2008, the Administrative Officer mailed via Certified Mail Return
Receipt, a Notice of Violation dated April 16, 2008, to John Belter for a zoning
violation at 102 Ethan Allen Drive (#NV-08-07 — EXHIBIT 1).
2. The Notice of Violation described the violation as: "Altered the existing grade
of your above referenced property in the vicinity of 44 Country Club Drive by
placing or allowing to be placed fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil or other similar
material in an amount equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards without approval
of the Development Review Board and a zoning permit".
3. A Notice of Appeal (#AO-08-06) was filed on 4/29/08 by John Belter (EXHIBIT
2), hereinafter referred to as "Appellant", appealing the Administrative
Officer's determination in Notice of Violation #NV-08-06.
4. A public notice on the appeal was published in Seven Days on May 14, 2008
(EXHIBIT 3).
The fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material placed on the
Appellant's property by Terry & Bethany Lieberman is depicted on a plan
entitled, "Topographic Survey for Terry & Bethany Lieberman 44 Country
Club Drive So. Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors,
Inc., last revised on March 14, 2008 (EXHIBIT 4). The Liebermans' agent
informed the Administrative Officer that the Liebermans placed approximately
200 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material on
the Belters' property.
6. Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations requires approval of the
Development Review Board for the placement of fill, gravel, sand, loam,
topsoil, or other similar material equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards
(EXHIBIT 5).
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com
7. No one has obtained approval from the Development Review Board for the
placement of more than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or
other similar material on Appellant's property.
8. Section 17.02 of the Land Development Regulations states, in relevant part,
that "no land development may be commenced within the area affected by
these regulations without a zoning permit issued by the Administrative
Officer" (EXHIBIT 6). The definition of "land development" includes "[t]he
construction, reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation or
enlargement of any building or other structure, or of any mining, excavation or
landfill ..." See Article 2 of the Land Development Regulations (emphasis
added).
9. No one has applied for or obtained a zoning permit for the placement of more
than 20 cubic yards of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material
on Appellant's property.
EXHIBIT
April 16, 2008
John Belter
2 Country Club Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Re: Zoning Violations — 102 Ethan Allen Drive
Dear Mr. Belter:
Please be advised that based on information available to the City, you have commenced
land development on your property at the above address without obtaining a zoning
permit from the City as required by Section 17.02 of the Land Development Regulations
and 24 VSA 4449 (a) (1). Specifically, you have initiated the following activities on the
above -described property.
Altered the existing grade of your above referenced property in the vicinity of 44 Country
Club Drive by placing or allowing to be placed fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil or other
similar material in an amount equal to or greater than 20 cubic yards without approval of
the Development Review Board and a zoning permit.
You have seven (7) days from the date of this letter to discontinue this violation and take
appropriate remedial action. Specifically, you must accomplish the following:
Either obtain all necessary approvals and permits for the grade alteration or remove all
fill material and return the site to it's original grade.
If you do not accomplish the actions directed in this letter within seven (7) days of the
date of this letter, the City may pursue this matter in court. In such court proceedings,
the City will be entitled to seek appropriate injunctive relief and fines of up to $100.00
per day for each day your violation continues beyond the seven (7) day period provided
in this letter.
If the violation described in this letter occurs within twelve (12) months of the date of
this letter, you will not be entitled to receive a further Notice of Violation from the City
before the City pursues further enforcement proceedings.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.shurt.com
You may appeal this Notice of Violation to the Development Review Board by filing a
written notice of appeal (see enclosed) and one hundred eleven ($111) dollars within
fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter with the Clerk of the Development Review
Board at the following address: 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403.
Administrative Officer
Encl.
CC: Amanda S. E. Lafferty, Esq.
Mark Sperry, Esq.
Certified Mail Return Receipt # 7008 0150 0003 6150 5546
) 1
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON EXHIBIT
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
Application #AO - -
NOTICE OF APPEAL
All information requested below must be completed in full. Failure to provide the
requested information on this notice will result in rejection of your application and delay
in the review of the appeal before the Development Review Board.
I understand:
• the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning
& Development Act);
• that the Development Review Board holds regular meetings twice a month;
• that a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to
the hearing on my appeal.
• 1 agree to pay a fee of $111 to offset the cost of the hearing on my appeal.
1) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPELLANT(S):
John Belter, 2 Country Club Drive, South Burlington,
2) LOCATION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AT ISSUE IN THIS
APPEAL:
Country Club Drive, northeasterly of Lieberman property
3) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING?
Notice of Violation dated April 16, 2008
- 1 -
4) WHAT PROVISIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE
APPLICABLE TO THIS APPEAL, IF ANY?
Section 312(A), Section 17.02, 24 V.S.A. 4449(a)(1), 24 V.S.A. 4451(a)
5) WHAT RELIEF DO YOU WANT THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD TO
GRANT?
Reverse decision of Zoning Administrator as to violation.
6) WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN NUMBER 5, ABOVE,
IS PROPER UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES?
Landowner did not place fill on property. Fill placed there by
Liebermans without landowners' consent or knowledge. This does not
constitute a violation.
7) LIST ABUTTERS (LIST ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER NAMES AND
ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY THAT ABUTS THE PROPERTY
THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPEAL).
Terry and Bethany Lieberman
21 Johnson Cir.,6le
North Andover, MA 01845
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this notice of appeal has
been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Ld &JL�, 2 S v�
SIGNATURE OF APPELLANT
DATE
-2-
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION: 7 ��
REVIEW AUTHORITY:
I have reviewed this Notice of Appeal and find it to be:
Complete Incomplete
y/8`r/°�,
Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date
-3-
3iSV I.COM {C1iC
"1
Show
CEXHIBIT
Open 24/7/365.
_______
_____________ ___a_�Wno__m
t^ View an
Post&
browse adc
6 photo
at your convenience.
Aication and proposed ..
Prior to convening a"hearing, . '.
District #,4 Coordinator.
PUBLIC HEARING
3. Appeal #AO-08-07 of Joyce,
may also be viewed on the
the District Commission. must .
11-1 West Street
SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP:
getter, appealing decision of the
Resources Board's web
determine that substantive is-
Essex Junction, VT 05452 .
MENT REVIEW BOARD
Administrative Officer to issue
Nw.nrb.state.vt.us/Lup)..by
sues requiring a hearing have
T/ 802-8Zg-5658
Notice of Violation #NV-08-08 for
I on "Act 250 Database,"
been raised. Findings.of Fact and
E/ peter.keibel@state.vi.us
-The South Burlington Development,
alteration of existing grade with-
ig""Entire Database," and,
" .Conclusions of Law will not be
Review Board will hold a public
out a zoning permit, 102 Ethan
g.the-casenumberabove.
prepared unless the Commission
hearing `atthe •South. Burlington.
Allen, Drive.
ing will be field unless; on
holds a public hearing.
CHARLOTTE PLANNING -
City Hall Conference Room, 575
r'e May 27; 2008, a party .
COMMISSION
Dorset Street,:South Burlington,
4. Appeal #AO-08-08.of.Terry &
the District Commission'
Should a hearing beheld on this
NOTICE'.OF PUBLIC HEARING .:
Vermont on Tuesday, June 3,
Bethany Lieberman, appealing de
sue or issues: requiring
..project and you have a,disability
2008'at 7:30 P.M. to consider the
cision of the Administrative Offict
;entation of eJidence at '.
for which you are going -to need
Pursuant to Title 24 Chapter 117
following:
to issue *Notices of Violation # NV
tg or the commission sets
accommodation, please notify, us.
V.S.A.'and the..Charlotte Land
08-09 & NV-08-10 for alteration
:ter for hearing on its
by May 27, 2008.
Use Regulation;,.the Charlotte
1. Conditional: use application
of existing grade without a zonini
lion. Any hearing fequest
Planning.Commission will meet
#CU708-03 of South Burlington
permit, 162 Ethan.ALlen Drive:
in writing to the address
Parties-entitted. to participate.are
on Thursday June 5,. 2008 at the .
School District seeking permission
;haLL state, the. criteria or
the Municipality, the Municipal
Town .Hall to hear the following
to install four (4) 80 foot high.
John Dinklage, Chairman
!' *a at issue', why a hearing
Planning Commission,. the Re-
application: , .
pole lights,.550. Dorset Street.
South $urlington :Development .
red and what additional -
gi,onaL Planning Commission,
Review Board
e will be presented at
adjoining property owners, other
8:30 PM.FinaL Plat'Hearing of
2.. Appeat, #AO-08-06 of -John
ring. Any hearing request
interested persons granted party
Clark Hinsdale III and Meg Berlin
Better, appealing decision, of the
Copies of.the applications are
djoining property owner .
status, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §'
for a subdivision modification to
Administrative Officer to issue
available for public inspection at,
interested Person must
6085(c). Non-party participants
change boundary lines'of adjacent .
Notice of Violation#NV-08,07 for
the South- Burlington City Hall: ,
a petition for party,status.
.. may also be allowed under 10
properties at 1251 Greenbush
alteration of existing grade with -
submitting a :request for
V.S.k §,6085(c)(5).
Road
out a zoning permit, 102 Ethan
May 14, 2008
ig, please contact the.dis-
Allen Drive..
)rdinator at the telephone .;
Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont,
Application material can be
STATE OF VERMONT
listed below for -more
this 2nd day of May 2608.
viewed at the Planning and Zoning
DISTRICT OF CHITTENDEN
lion.
Office. Participation in the hearing
PROBATE COURT
/s/Peter E:•KeibeL
is a- prerequisite to the right to
DOCKET NO.32397. .
'Peter E. Keibe(
appeal any decision related to.
Natural Resources Board
these applications.
IN RE THE ESTATE.OF
Geraldine`M. LaPLant
_
LATE OF 50.. BURLINGTON, VT .
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE -
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
creditors estate of
To the of the
InstitutionalZoning#ZA-0.8-01
Geraldine M. taPlant late. of Soutl
Burlington.
That the Comprehensive Development Ordinance of the Code'of.Ordinances of the City of Buriingtori be and hereby is
- •.
amended by amending Sections 4,4.4, 4.5.2 and Appendix B.as set forth in the document attached hereto.
I have been appointed as person
representative,of the above name
ZONINGAMENDMENT.
estate, All creditors Having claim:
against the estate must present
Burlington Comprehensive Development Ordinance. ZA-08-01 re: Institutional Zoning Districts
their claims in writing within fou
months of the first publication
;ec. 4.4.4 Institutional
DistrIct `
of this notice. The claim must be
able 4.4.4 =1 Dimensional -Standards and Density,.
iistricts
Max Intensity,
Mox; Cot Coverage'
Building Setbacks' (feet). '
Max
Front?. : Side?., .. Rear'
Height', .
istitutional' .
2Odu/ae
40%j
Minimum: 10%Oflotwidth. 2594of lot depth.
35;
(24 du/acre With
(480A With
154eet , Min:3-feet Min:204eet
inclusionary retjJ
inclusionary req.) -
Max:20-feet Max:75-feet.
I —Measurement of and exceptions to covqrage, setback and height standards are found in Art 5.
t The calculation of the front yards, et.back shall be a percentage of lot width and depth .or as defined:and described in Art 5.
1= Maximum allowable dot coverage, setbacks and building height in portions of this district may be modified by the provisions of the Institutional. Core Campus
Overlays in Sec.4.5.2
presented to meat the address
listed below with a copy filed wit
the register of the Probate Court.
The claim. will be foreve.r,barred
if it is not presented as describec
..within the four month deadline.
Dated. May 1, 2008
Signed: Robert J. Perry
Address:. PO Box 238
Burlington, VT 05402
802-658-2675
Name of Publication:
Seven Days
First Publication Date: 5%Z/08
C 4c5 2 Institutional.Core Campus Overlay Districts second Publication Date: 5/14/0;
District Specific Regulations: Retch Health Care Campus (ICC-FAHC) and 0VM Main Campus (iCC-uVM); ..: Address of Probate Court:
Building Height Probate Court; District ot-Chit-
img height shall bemeasuredunderthe provisions of Art. 5 except that.the.Measurementfnterval method specified in Sec. 5.25(a)(3) shall not apply. Except for ornamental and tenden
folic architettura4features, additions and new construction.may be built to a height that'does not exceed the lesser of: PO Box 511
A. The actuil.height of the tallest existing structure as of January 1, 2007 and located within the respective institutions corecampus Burlington, VT 05402
lay district or, _
B. The elevation of a plane running parallel to sea levelfrom a.point.defined by the roof of the tallest structure at the highest
elevation w t I ..`the parcel as depicted as of January 1, 2000. SULU=
Density '
LOT 48A
WILLIAM & MELINDA COOPER
s s
a
LEGEND
IRON PIPE —ROD FOUND 0
1 " IRON PIPE TO BE SET
GAS LINE AS MARKED IN FIELD
POWER LINE AS MARKED IN FIELD p
SEWER LINE s
WA TER VAL VE D4
JOHN H. & JOYCE N. BEL TER, JR.
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
s s s s
60 FT. RIGHT OF WAY
LOT 47
s s— sp
cm
REFER TO SURVEY PLAT ENTITLED BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
FOR JANE EVANS HARROCK" PREPARED BY VERMONT LAND
SURVEYORS, INC. DATED 4121104 & 4126104 AND RECORDED
ON SLIDE #436.
SCALE : 1 INCH = 20 FEET
O 20 40 60 80 100
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR
TERRY & BETHANY LIEBERMAN
44 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT
E`- ')BIT
65
ARTICLE 3
GENERAL PROVISIONS
total of six (6) months in a one year period, any future use of such land shall
be in compliance with all provisions of these Regulations.
3.12 Alteration of Existing Grade
A. Permit Required. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel,
sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty
(20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a
structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the Development Review Board. The
Development Review Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested
in connection with the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision
plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a
resource extraction operation (see Section 13.16, Earth Products.)
B. Standards and Conditions for Approval.
(1) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for
compliance with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). and
Section 3.07, Height of Structures of these regulations. An application under
Section 3.12(A) above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit
development or subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or
removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or
addition of material.
(2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any
conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time.
(b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the
conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting,
fencing, drainage, and other appropriate measures.
(c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure
compliance with the provisions of this Section.
(d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under
Section 3.07, Height of Structures.
3.13 General Performance and Maintenance Standards
A. Purpose of Performance Standards. Consistent with the general purposes of
these regulations, performance standards (see Appendix A) shall set specific controls on
potentially objectionable external aspects of such non-residential uses so as to:
(1) Reduce to a reasonable minimum the dissemination of smoke, gas, dust, odor,
or other atmospheric pollutant outside the structure or beyond the property
boundaries in which the use is conducted.
South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective February 6, 2007
234
ARTICLE 17 ADMINISTRATION and ENFORCEMENT
EXHIBIT
17 ADMINISTRATION and ENFORCEMENT
17.01 General Provisions
17.02 Zoning Permits
17.03 Certificates of Occupancy
17.04 Expiration of Permits and Approvals
17.05 Revocation of Permits and Approvals
17.o6 Fees
17.07 Planning Commission
17.o8 Development Review Board
17.og Design Review Committee
17.10 Amendments to Regulations and Maps
17.11 Violations
17.12 Penalties
17.13 Appeals
17.o1 General Provisions
A. Applicability of Vermont Planning and Development Act.
Administration and enforcement of these regulations, the effect of the adoption of these
regulations, the appointment and powers of the Administrative Officer, the appointment
and powers of the Development Review Board, the requirement for zoning permits and
certificates of occupancy/compliance, penalties and remedies, administration and finance,
public notice, appeals and granting of variances and other related provisions of Chapter 117
and Title 24, Vermont Statutes Annotated, known as the Vermont Planning and
development Act, shall be applicable to these regulations, as such provisions now provide or
may hereafter be amended. [reserved]
17.02 Zoning Permits
A. Zoning Permit Required. No land development may be commenced within the
area affected by these regulations without a zoning permit issued by the Administrative
Officer. No zoning permit may be issued by the Administrative Officer except in
conformance with these regulations and the provisions of the Vermont Planning and
Development Act. Any applicant for a zoning permit shall provide the Administrative
Officer with any and all information the Administrative Officer deems necessary to
ascertain compliance with these zoning regulations. Such permit shall not be effective until
the time for appeal has expired, or such appeal has been adjudicated, in accordance with
the Vermont Planning and development Act.
17.03 Certificates of Occupancy
A. Certificate of Occupancy Required. It shall be unlawful to use, occupy or
permit the use or occupancy of any land or structure or part thereof created, erected,
changed, converted, or wholly or partly altered or enlarged in its use or structure until a
certificate of occupancy has been issued therefor by the Administrative Officer.
South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective February 6, 2007
A
100,
Or
�®
southburlinoon
PLANNING & ZONING
May 30, 2008
Mark Sperry
Langrock Sperry & Wool
PO Box 721
Burlington, VT 05402-0721
Re: 102 Ethan Allen Drive
Dear Mr. Sperry:
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and
staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on
Tuesday, June 3, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset
Street.
If you have any questions, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
Betsy McDonough Brown
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Encl.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com
I
A
southburlintou
PLANNING & ZONING
May 30, 2008
David Rugh, Esq.
Jon Anderson, Esq.
Burak Anderson & Melloni
PO Box 787
Burlington, VT 05402-0787
Re: 102 Ethan Allen Drive/44 Country Club Drive
Dear Mr. Rugh & Mr. Anderson:
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and
staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on
Tuesday, June 3, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset
Street.
If you have any questions, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
Betsy c onough Brown
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Encl.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
Application #AO -Q - -0--F
NOTICE OF APPEAL
All information requested below must be completed in full. Failure to provide the
requested information on this notice will result in rejection of your application and delay
in the review of the appeal before the Development Review Board.
I understand:
• the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning
& Development Act);
• that the Development Review Board holds regular meetings twice a month;
• that a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to
the hearing on my appeal.
• I agree to pay a fee of $111 to offset the cost of the hearing on my appeal.
1) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPELLANT(S):
John Belter, 2 Country Club Drive, South Burlington
2) LOCATION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AT ISSUE IN THIS
APPEAL:
Country Club Drive, northeasterly of Lieberman property
3) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING?
Notice of Violation dated April 16, 2008
- 1 -
4) WHAT PROVISIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE
APPLICABLE TO THIS APPEAL, IF ANY?
Section 312(A), Section 17.02, 24 V.S.A. 4449(a)(1), 24 V.S.A. 4451(a)
5) WHAT RELIEF DO YOU WANT THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD TO
GRANT?
Reverse decision of Zoning Administrator as to violation.
6) WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN NUMBER 5, ABOVE,
IS PROPER UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES?
Landowner did not place fill on property. Fill placed there by
Liebermans without landowners' consent or knowledge. This does not
constitute a violation.
7) LIST ABUTTERS (LIST ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER NAMES AND
ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY THAT ABUTS THE PROPERTY
THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPEAL).
Terry and Bethany Lieberman
21 Johnson Circle
North Andover, MA 01845
hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this notice of appeal has
been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
SIGNATURE OF APPELLANT
DATE
IIPM
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION: ! i
REVIEW AUTHORITY:
I have reviewed this Notice of Appeal and find it to be:
Complete Incomplete
Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date
-3-
0 4 / 2 4./1") 8 16:26' FAX 8('.)2 864 0137 Langrock, S.perri-&-l"ool Bur
Application #AO - 0
-0-01
ri de
Ali infOTMattion requested below rnu$-1:10e cQmPISA-ad in full. Fa U & �l F, t 0 pr v! the
requ8sted information on this notice will p�.,qult in rej.-c-flon of Your appllqc-rtion and delay
in the nevi, w of the appeal before the Development RA -view Board.
I understand-.
the presentak-in procedures requked by State Law 4463 of the Planniing
,u Development Act); ice a
th-a, the Devalopl-n I
ei-ij Review Board holds regular M86thl,-Os UV, mQnth
that a legal adverfiscoment mustaPP-38r a m1ninnum of fifteen (15) days prior to
the hearing on my appeal.
I agree to pay a fee of $110 to offs8t the cost of the hearing on my appeal.
-I) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPr-!!LLANT(S):
jcy�p- Baiter, 2 CQuilt-ry Cizit, Dr, , . Scj�u-t-h Burlington
2) LOCATION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AT ISIME IN THIS
APPEAL:
Coi-intry Clixb Drivr�-)
'3) WHAT AICT(ON' OF THE ADMINIIS'TRATIVE C)FIFICER ARE YOU APPEAL11,113 ?
110tiCe Of `,7jC�:LLjtj On d ated April 16, 2008
- 1 -
04/24/08 16 : 26 FA-K 802 864 0 i 3 7 LanFrocl-., Sperr;-&Wool Bur U004
4) VMAT PROVIS11,ONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE
APPLICABLE TO THIS APPEAL; IF 'ANY?
Sectzoii 312(A)Section 1-,02, 24 V.Q.A. 4449(a)(1), 24 V.S.A, 44551(a)
,
5) WLIAT RELIEF DO YOU WANT THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD TO
I
GRANT?
s ro violatim.
Z�
6) WHY r-�O YOU BELIEVE THAT THE RELIEF REQUESTEO IN NUM -ER 5. ASOVE,
IS PROPER UNDER THE CIPGUMSTANCES?
on prope�rty., Fill placed there b,,�
Landowzq�n-- did not Plar-e
T.iebermanE wit'nout t or 1� owl.edge. This does
-stitute. a violation,
7) LIST ABUTTERS (LIST ON SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER NAMES AND
ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY THAT ABUTS THE PROPERTY
THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPEAL).
'Terry and Bethany Li-eberman
21 Johnson Circle
North Andover_ MA 01845
I hereby certiry ii4,st all the inforrnat;on ret*:stud as part of this nQficzof appeal ha-s
been rubmittsd and is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
.SIONATURRIC�--OP APPELLANT
joyce Belter
DATE
- � -
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
REVIEW AUTHORITY:
I have reviewed this Notice of Appeal and find it to be:
Complete Incomplete
Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date
-3-
J
BURAK ANDERSON
MELLONI
Counsellors at La-,tir
Mr. Raymond J. Belair
Administrative Officer
Department of Planning and Zoning
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
Michael L. Burak"
Jon Anderson
Thomas R. Mellon"
Michael B. Rosenberg'
Shane W. McCormack"$
W. Scott liewell�
Anja Freiburg
David W. Rughl"I
Gateway Square • 30 Main Street
Post Office Box 787
Burlington, Vermont 05402.0787
Phone: 802 862-0500
Fax: 802 862-8176
www.vtlawl.com
"Also admitted in New York
"",Uso admitted in Mar�iand
*AI so
admitted in the District of Columbia
#Also admitted in Massachusetts
°Also admitted in Connecticut & Pennsylvania
April 29, 2008
MAY 0 1 2008
City of So. Budington
Re: Lieberman Alleged Zoning Violation, 44 Country Club Drive
Dear Mr. Belair:
Enclosed please find the Lieberman's notice of appeal for a zoning violation letter issued
April 23, 2008. The Liebermans intend to file a zoning application for approval of the fill or its
removal, as soon as the signatures of the landowners, John and Joyce Belter, and access rights to
their land, have been obtained.
Additionally, although we have enclosed a check in the amount of $111.00 for the appeal,
the Liebermans are paying such amount under protest and expect that it will be returned to them
in the future. It is not only inequitable, Jut also contrary to a party's rights in the justice systern
that they must pay the party who commenced an action against them a fee to exercise their
appeal rights to defend such action. Defendants in any judicial or quasi-judicial matter, like a
zoning violation and enforcement action, cannot be held financially responsible to exercise their
constitutional right to appeal.
Sin cexe-
A,
W. Rugh, Esq.
DWR/alb
Enclosures
S:\Client Matters\80286\Letters\dwr belair2.doc
MIDDLEBURY
LANGROCK SPERRY & WOOL, LLP
Peter F. Langrock
Ellen Mercer Fallon
William B. Miller, Jr.
James W. Swift
Emily J. Joselson
Mitchell L. Pearl
Kevin E. Brown
Frank H.Langrock
Beth Robinson
F. Rendol Barlow
Devin McLaughlin
Wanda Otero -Ziegler
Erin E. Ruble
April 29, 2008
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including a Professional Corporation
Re: Appeal of John and Joyce Belter
Dear Ray:
Enclosed are the following:
Notice of Appeal of John Belter and our check for the filing fee of $111.
2 Notice of Appeal of Joyce Belter and our check for the filing fee of $111.
BURLINGTON
Michael W. Wool
Mark L. Sperry
Christopher L. Davis
Thomas Z. Carlson
Susan M. Murray
Alison J. Bell
Lisa B. Shelkrot
Eric M. Knudsen
David W. M. Conard
Thomas J. Sherrer
Sarah Gentry Tischler
Erin Miller Heins
Hobart F. Popick
REPLY TO:
Burlington Office
In light of the fact that Mr. and Mrs. Belter own the property jointly, I would request that you
give consideration to refunding one of the $111 checks, as this should be treated as one appeal.
Sincerely yours,
Mark L. Sperr
MLS:mns
Enclosures
c: John and Joyce Belter
Hobart F. Popick
456686.1
City of So. Burlington
MIDDLEBURY: 111 S. Pleasant Street • P.O. Drawer 351 • Middlebury, Vermont 05753.0351
(802) 388-6356 • Fax (802) 388-6149 • Email: attorneys @langrock.com • Website: www.langrock.com
BURLINGTON: 210 College Street • P.O. Box 721 • Burlington, Vermont 05402-0721
(802) 864.0217 • Fax (802) 864.0137 • Email: attorneys @langrock.com • Website: www.langrock.com
MIDDLEBURY
Peter F. Langrock
Ellen Mercer Fallon
William B. Miller, Jr.
James W. Swift
Emily J. Joselson
Mitchell L. Pearl
Kevin E. Brown
Frank H.Langrock
Beth Robinson
F. Rendol Barlow
Devir+ McLaughlin
Wanda Otero -Ziegler
Erin E. Ruble
May 6, 2008
LANGROCK SPERRY & WOOL, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including a Professional Corporation
South Burlington Development Review Board
c/o Ray Belair, Director of Planning and
Zoning
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
BURLINGTON
Michael W. Wool
Mark L. Sperry
Christopher L. Davis
Thomas Z. Carlson
Susan M. Murray
Alison J. Bell
Lisa B. Shelkrot
Eric M. Knudsen
David W. M. Conard
Thomas J. Sherrer
Sarah Gentry Tischler
Erin Miller Heins
Hobart F. Popick
REPLY TO:
Burlington Office
Re: Terry and Bethany Lieberman — Appeal of Notice of Violation dated April 23, 2008
Dear Ray:
Enclosed please find my Notice of Appearance related to the above matter. Please let me know
if you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
Mark L. Sperry
MLS:mns
Enclosures
c: David W. Rugh, Esq. (Attorney for Liebermans)
John and Joyce Belter
457067.1
MIDDLEBURY: 111 S. Pleasant Street • P.O. Drawer 351 • Middlebury, Vermont 05753-0351
(802) 388-6356 • Fax (802) 388-6149 • Email: attorneys @langrock.com • Website: www.langrock.com
BURLINGTON: 210 College Street • P.O. Box 721 • Burlington, Vermont 05402-0721
(802) 864.0217 • Fax (802) 864-0137 • Email: attorneys @langrock.com • Website: www.langrock.com
STATE OF VERMONT
SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
IN RE: Terry and Bethany Lieberman Appeal of Zoning Violation dated April 23, Application #AO-06-D
2008
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
Now comes Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP and hereby enters its appearance in the
above proceeding on behalf of John H. Belter, Jr. and Joyce N. Belter, adjoining property
owners to the applicants.
DATED at Burlington, Vermont this / day of May, 2008.
LANGROCK SPERRY & WOOL, LLP
Mark L. Sp rry
PO Box 7 1, 210 College Street
Burling n, VT 05402
(802)864-0217
457055A
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
Application #AO
NOTICE OF APPEAL
All information requested below must be completed in full. Failure to provide the
requested information on this notice will result in rejection of your application and delay
in the review of the appeal before the Development Review Board.
understand:
• the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning
& Development Act);
• that the Development Review Board holds regular meetings twice a month;
• that a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to
the hearing on my appeal.
• 1 agree to pay a fee of $111 to offset the cost of the hearing on my appeal.
1) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPELLANT(S):
Terry and Bethany Lieberman, c/o David W. Rugh, Esq., Burak Anderson
& Melloni, PLC, P.O. Box 787, Burlington, VT 05402-0787
2) LOCATION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AT ISSUE IN THIS
APPEAL:
Property northerly of 44 Country Club'Drive, at what is known as
102 Ethan Allen Drive
3) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING?
Zoning Violation letter, dated April 23, 2008
- 1 -
4) WHAT PROVISIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE
APPLICABLE TO THIS APPEAL, IF ANY?
Zoning Regulations section 3.12
5) WHAT RELIEF DO YOU WANT THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD TO
GRANT?
Grant a permit to leave fill or to remove
6) WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN NUMBER 5, ABOVE,
IS PROPER UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES?
The Zoning Regulations require it.
7) LIST ABUTTERS (LIST ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER NAMES AND
ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY THAT ABUTS THE PROPERTY
THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPEAL).
Janine Kirchgassner, 45 Country Club Drive
John and Joyce Belter, 2 Country Club Drive
Neil and Patricia Zoller, 46 Country Club Drive
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this notice of appeal has
been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
SIGNATURE OF APPELLANT
DATE
-2-
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
REVIEW AUTHORITY:
I have reviewed this Notice of Appeal and find it to be:
Complete Incomplete _
6
L/ut'-c[or oT rianning & Zoning or Designee Date
-3-
.CrTY ERK'tiurri��
Rc ived`r A20at'1M
Recorded in Vol. on parde,�,
Of So. Surltngton Land Records
Attest:
WARRANTY DEED
Donna S. Klnville, M Glerh
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT, We, Rasim Redzic and
Jasmina Redzic, of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantors, in the
consideration ofTENAND MORE Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by Terry R. Lieberman and
Beth any Lieberman, of., 9✓Lp s,i6y,J , County of 0"*7j7r✓s'5',J and State of
Grantees, by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto
the said Grantees, Terry R. Lieberman and Bethany Lieberman, husband and wife, tenants by
the entirety, their, heirs and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in the City of South Burlington,
County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz:
Being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to Rasim Redzic and Jasmina Redzic
by Warranty Deed of Jane Evans Harrocks dated October 12, 2004, and recorded in Volume
685 at Pages 198-199 of the City of South Burlington Land Records.
A parcel of land situated on the northwesterly side of Country Club Drive, being lot No.48,
as shown on a plan entitled: `BoundaryLine Adjustment for Jane Evans Harrocks", prepared
by Vermont Land Surveyors, Inc., dated April 21 and April 26, 2004, recorded at Map Slide
436 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at an iron pipe set in the ground in the sideline of said Country Club Drive,
which point marks the southeasterly corner of land conveyed by the Jane Evans Harrocks to
William and Melinda Cooper by Warranty Deed dated July 23, 2004 and the southwesterly
corner of the parcel herein described; thence proceeding N 38 17'49" W in and along the
sideline of said Copper land a distance of 107.00 feet, more or less, to an iron pipe set in the
ground; thence continuing N 49 43145" W a distance of 52.71 feet, more or less, to an iron
pipe set in the ground; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 71 52' 55"E a distance
of 36.00 feet, more or less, to an iron pipe set in the ground; thence turning to the right and
continuing S 71 20' 31"E a distance of 182.02 feet, more or less, to an iron pipe set in the
ground in the sideline of said Country Club Drive; thence turning to the right and proceeding
S 54 39'29" W a distance of 122.76 feet, more or less, to the point or place of beginning.
Said land and premises are subject to Building and Trade Covenants of the Country Club
Estates, which are recorded in Volume 69 at Pages 331-332 of the City of South Burlington
Land Records, as extended by documents recorded in Volume 394 at Page 240 of the City
of South Burlington Land Records.
The Building and Trade Covenants also include a reservation or exception of a right of way
or easement to the herein Grantors, their heirs, executors, or assigns, to a five (5) foot right
of way abutting the side and rear boundary lines of said lot and along Country Club Drive
for the installation, maintenance and repair of public utilities and telephone transmission
lines.
Reference is hereby made to the above -referenced deeds and plans and the references
contained therein, in further aid of the description.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all said granted premises, with all the privileges and
appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantees, Terry R, Lieberman and Bethany Lieberman,
74805
husband and wife, tenants by the entirety, their heirs and assigns, to their own use and behoof
forever; and the said Grantors, Rasim Redzic and Jasmina Redzic, for themselves, their heirs and
assigns and administrators, do covenant with the said Grantees, Terry R, Lieberman and Bethany
Lieberman, their heirs and assigns that until the ensealing of these presents they are the sole owners
of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that it is
FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE: except as aforesaid; and they, hereby engage to
WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Rasim Redzic and Jasmina Redzic, hereunto set their hands
and seal this /6/1day of May, 2006.
In the presence of:
1 a
li.I1��, l7r;
Rasim Redzic
f
j.��.)
rJasmina Redzic
STATE OF VERMONT
COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, ss.
At'. - &('e rt -/&—VW , Vermont this �_ day of May, 2006, Rasim Redzic and
Jasmina Redzic, personally appeared and they acknowledged this instrument, by them sealed and
subscribed, to be their free act and deed.
VLnY rnnnt C'mpprty TrinefOr Tax
32 V.S.A. Chap 231
JECUMXI'A108 .W)(.5p'hl_
1''; LG;P:iJ U51= 3 DLVE Lid f P%tldu rzC i. CI�'tL SCi;G ;i
Return No.
;Clerk
Date
Before me
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: 02/10/07
- "- .ma.a aaNr--KIT
►►swenaaysvt.com [cli(
Show and tell. Open 24/7/365.
View and post up to Post & browse ads
6 photos per ad online. at your :convenience.
pplication and proposed Prior to convenin4 a hearing,
District #4
t may also be viewed on the the District Commission must 1111 West Streetdinator PUBLIC HEARING
IAppeal #AO-08-07 of Joyce
Essex Jun .
al Resources Board's web determine that substantive is- SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- Better, appealing decision of the
aww.nrb.state.vt.us/tup). by sues requiring a hearinghave ction, UT 05452 MENT REVIEW BOARD Administrative Officer to issue
19 on "Act 250 Database," been raised. FinT/ 802-879-5658 Notice of Violation #NV-08-08 for
Findings of fact and E/ peter.keibel@state.vt.us The South Burlington Development alteration of existing grade with-
ing "Entire Database," and Conclusions of Law will not be
ng the case number above. prepared unless the Commission Review Board will hold a public out a zoning permit, 102 Ethan
aring will be held unless, on holds a public hearing' hearing at the South Burlington Allen Drive.
'ore May 27, 2008, a party CHARLOTTE PLANNING City Hall Conference Room, 575
es the District Commission Should a hearing be held on this COMMISSION Dorset Street, South Burlington, 4. Appeal #AO-08-08 of Terry &
issue or issues requiring project and you have a disability NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Vermont on Tuesday, June 3, Bethany Lieberman, appealing de
•esentation of evidence at for which you are goinq_to need 2008 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the cisionBethany
of the Administrative Office
ring or the commission sets accommodation, lease notify us Pursuant to Title 24 Chapter 117 following: to issue Notices i Violation # NV
atter for hearingon its p, ty V.S.A. and the Charlotte Land by May 27, 2008. Use Regulation$, the Charlotte 1. Conditional use application of existing08-09 grade without aa
notion. Any hearing request10 zonin,
"
be in writing to the address Parties�entitled to participate are Ptanning.Commission will meet #CU-08-03 of South Burlington
shall state Ehe criteria or p p on ThursdayJune 5, 2008 at the School District seeking9 permit, 102 Ethan Allen Drive.
the Municipality, the Municipal f permission
p Town Hall to hear the following to install four (4) 80 foot high John Dinklage, Chairman
iteria at issue; why a hearing Planning Commission, the Re-
uired and what additional gional Planning Commission, application: pole lights, 550 Dorset Street. South Burlington Development
rice will be presented at adjoining property
p rty owners, other- 8:30 PM Final Plat Hearing of 2. Appeal #AO-08-06 of John Review Board taring. Any hearing request interested persons granted party Clark Hinsdale III and Meg Berlin Better, appealing decision of the Copies of the applications are
adjoining property.owner status. pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §
red interested person must stet c .Non- art for a subdivision modification to Administrative Officer to issue available for public inspection at
O Non-party participants change boundary lines'of adjacent Notice of Violation #NV-08-07 for the South_ Burlington City Hall.
le a petition for party status. may also be allowed under,10
to submitting a request for V.S.A. § 6085(c)(5). properties at 1251 Greenbush alteration of existing grade with -
ring, please contact the dis Road out a zoning permit, 102 Ethan May 14, 2008
:oordinator at the telephone Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, Application material can be Allen Drive.
er listed below for more this 2nd day of May 2008.
nation. viewed at the Planning and Zoning O STATE OF VERMNT
Office. Participation in the hearing TENDEN
DISTRICT OF M
/s/ Peter Keibel is a prerequisite to the right to PROBATE COURT
Peter E. Keibel appeal any decision related to DOCKET NO. 32397
Natural Resources Board these applications.
IN RE THE ESTATE OF
Geraldine M. La Plant
LATE OF SO. BURLINGTON, VT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE NOTICE TO CREDITORS
-
Institutional Zoning #ZA-08-01 To the creditors of the estate of
Geraldine M. LaPlant late of Soutl
That the Comprehensive Development Ordinance of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Burlington be and hereby is Burlington.
amended by amending Sections 4.4.4, 4.5.2 and Appendix B as set forth in the document attached hereto. I have been appointed as p ersom
ZONING AMENDMENT. representative of the above name
estate. All creditors havingclaim�
Burlington Comprehensive Development Ordinance ZA-08-oIre. InstitUtiona/ZOninDistricts their claims in writing within fou
against the estate must present
'Sec. 4.4.4lnstitutional District months of the first publication
Table 4.4.4 -1 Dimensional Standards and Density . of this notice. The claim must be
presented to meat the address
Districts Max. lntensl r listed below with a copy filed wit
ty, Max. lot Coverage Budfbkeet) Max the register of the Probate Court.
Rears Height' The claim will be forever barred
InstitUtionala 20 du/ac if it is not presented as describes
40%Minimiidth 35' within the four month deadline.
(24 du/acre with is%dflot depth(48% with 15-feMin:10-feet
indusionary req.) indusionary req.) t Max: 75-feet Dated: May 1, 2008
Signed: Robert J. Perry
1—Measurement of and exceptions to covefage, setback and height standards are found in Art 5. Address: PO Box 238
2 the calculation of the front yard setback shall be a percentage of lot width and depth or as defined and described in Art 5. Burlington, VT 05402
3 - Maximum allowable lot coverage, setbacks and building height in portions of this district may be modified by the provisions of the Institutional Campus 802-658-2675
Overlays in Set.4.5.2 Name of Publication:
Seven Days
Sec. 4.5.2 institutional Core Cam us Overla bistricts First Publication Date: 5/7/08
d DistridspecfficRegulations:FletcherAllenHealth (are Campus (ICC-FAHC) andUVMMainCampus(ICC-UVM); Second Publication Date: 5/14/0
Building Height Address of Probate Court:
wilding height shall be measured underthe provisions of Art. 5 except that.the Measurement'Intervai method specified in Sec. 5.2.5(a)(3) shall not apply. Except for ornamental and Probate Court, District of. Chit-
imbolic architectural features, additions and new construction may be built to a height that'does not exceed the lesser of: tenden
A. The actual height of the tallest existing structure as of January 1, 2007 and located within the respective institutions core campus PO Box 511
uerlaydistrict,or, Burlington, VT 05402
B. The elevation ofa plane running parallel to sea level from a point defined by the roof of the tallest structure at the highest
elevation within'the parcel as depicted as of January 1, 2000.
Density
the ICC-UVM/FAHC District density restrictions set forth in Article 4, Sec.4.4.4 shall not apply to dormitories and rooming houses as defined in Chapter 1E of the Burlington Code of
►►s*,%venaaysvt.com (cii(
Show and tell.
� Open 24/7
View and post u to /3 d 5 .
Vi
P Post & browse ads
6 photos per ad online.
at your _convenience.
pplication and proposed Prior to convening a hearing, District #4 Coordinator
t may also be viewed on the the District Commission must 111 West Street PUBLIC HEARING 3. Appeal #AO-08-07 of Joyce
it Resources Board's web determine that substantive is- Essex Junction, V7 05452 SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- Better, appealing decision of the
,vww.nrb.state.vt.us/lup)_by sues requiring a hearing have T/ 802-879-5658 MENT REVIEW BOARD Administrative Officer to issue
ig on "Act 250 Database," been raised. Findings of fact and E/peterNotice of Violation #NV-08-08 for
ing "Entire Database," and Conclusions of Law will not be .keibel@state.vt.us The South Burlington Development alteration of existing grade with-
ng the case number above. prepared unless the Commission Review Board will hold a public out a zoning permit, 102 Ethan
aring will be held unless, on holds a public hearing. CHARLOTTE PLANNING hearing at the South Burlington Allen Drive.
' City Hall Conference Room, 575
ore May 27, 2008, a party
COMMISSION Dorset Street, South Burlington, 4. Appeal #AO-08-08 of Terry &
es the District Commission Should a hearing be held on this NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING issue or issues requiring project and you have a disability Vermont on Tuesday, June 3, Bethany Lieberman, appealing de
'esentation of evidence at for which you are going to need 2008 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the. cision of the Administrative office
Y 9 9- Pursuant to Title 24 Chapter 117 following: to issue Notices of Violation # NV
ring or the commission sets accommodation, please notify us V.S.A. and the Charlotte Land otter for hearing on its by May 27, 2008. 08-09 & NV-08-10 for alteration
notion.efor e hearing request Use Regulations,. the Charlotte 1. Conditional Use application of existing
Plan ning".Commission wilt meet grade without r zonirn
be in writing to the address Parties -entitled to participate are on Thursday June 5, 2008 at the Sc oo8District seeking permission
permit, 102 Ethan Allen Drive.
shall state the criteria or the Municipality, the Municipal Town Hall to hear the following to instal( four (4) 80 foot high John Dinklage, Chairman
iteria at issue; why a hearing Planning Commission, the Re- a
uired and what additional _ gionat Planning Commission, pphcation: pole lights, 550 Dorset Street. South Burlington Development
ice will be presented at adjoining property owners, other 8:30 PM Final PlatHearing of 2. Appeal #AO-08-06 of John Review Board
-aring. Any hearing request interested persons granted party Clark Hinsdale III and Meg Berlin Better, appealing decision of the Copies of the applications are
adjoining property owner status. pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §
ier interested person must for a subdivision modification to Administrative Officer to issue available for public inspection at
6085(c). Non-party participants change boundary lines of adjacent Notice of Violation #NV-08-07 for the South_ Burlington City Halt.
le a petition for party status. may also be allowed under 10
to.submiging a request for V.S.A. § 6085(c)(5). Road propesties at 1251 Greenbush alteration of existing grade with -
ring, please contact the dis out a zoning permit, 102 Ethan _May 14, 2008
:oordinator at the telephone Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, Application material can be Allen Drive.
er listed below for more this 2nd day of May 2008. viewed at the Planning and Zoning STATE OF VERMONT
nation. Office. Participation in the hearing DISTRICT CHITiENDEN
/s/ Peter E Keibel is a, prerequisite to the right to PROBATE COURT
Peter E. Keibet appeal any decision related to DOCKET N0._ 32397.
Natural Resources Board these applications.
IN RE THE ESTATE OF
Geraldine M. LaPtant
LATE OF SO. BURLINGTON, VT .
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE _ NOTICE TO CREDITORS
To the creditors of the estate of
Institutional Zoning #ZA-Q$-Q� Geraldine M. LaPtant late ofSoutl
That the Comprehensive Development Ordinance of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Burlington be and hereby is Burlington.
amended by amending Sections 4.4.4, 4.5.2 and Appendix B as set forth in the document attached hereto. I have been appointed as person
ZONING AMENDMENT representative the above name
estate. All creditors having claim
Burlington Comprehensive Development Ordinance ZA-08-01 re: Institutional Zoning Districts against the their claims in writing ate mustwithinpresent
fou
5ec. 4.4.4 Institutional District months of the first publication
Table 4.4.4 -1 DimensionalStandards and Density, of this notice. The claim must be
presented to me at the address
listed below with a copy filed wit
Districts Max. Intensity Max. Lot Coverage' Building Setbacks' (feet) Max the register of the Probate Court.
Fronts Side Rear' , The claim will be forever barred
Height if it is not presented as describec
E—Measurement
20du/ac 40% Minimum: 10% of lot width " 35' within the four month deadline.
(24 du/acre with Min:20 of depth
(48% with 15-feet Min: Min:20-feet Dated: May 1, 2008
Indusionary req.) indusionaryreq.) Max:20-feet Max: 75-feet
Signed: Robert J. Perry
nt ofand exceptions to covgage, setback and height standards are found in Art S. Address: PO Box 238 .
tion of thefrontyard setbackshall bea percentage of lotwidth and depth oras definedand described in Art5. Burlington, 5 05402
llowable lot coverage, setbacks and building heightin portionsofthis districtmay be modified bythe provisionsofthe Institutional Core Campus802-658 2675Sec.4.5.2 Name of Publication:
Seven Days
Sec. 4.5 2 InStitutional Core Campus OverlayDistricts First .Publication Date: e: /
Second Publication Date: 5/14/0;
(c) - District Specific Regulations Fletcher Allen Health Care Campus (ICC-FAHC) and UVM Main Campus ([CC-UVM);
5• Building Height Address of Probate Court:
Building height shall bemeasured under the provisions of Art 5 except that the Measurementinterval method specified in Sec. 525(a)(3) shall not apply. Except for ornamental and Probate Court, District of.Chit-
symbolic architectural features, additions and new construction may be built to a height thattioes not exceed the lesser of: tendon .
A. The actual height of the tallest existing structure as of January 1, 2007 and located within the restive institutions core campus PO Box 511
respective Burlington, VT 05402
B. The elevation of a plane running parallel to sea level from a point defined by the roof of the tallest structure at the highest
elevation within the parcel as depicted as of January 1, 2000.
i. Density '
n the [CC -UVM/FAHC District, density restrictions set forth in Article 4, Sec. 4.4.4 shall not apply to dormitories and rooming houses as defined in Chapter 18 ofthe Burlinqton Code of
w