Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0057 Fayette Road
June 27, 2018 Re: #SP-18-26 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerer,] Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Str--et Soutn Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.855.4105 fax 802.84-5.4101 wwew✓.sburl.com Transmittal TO: Ray Belair DATE: 6/26/18 PROJECT: 57 Fayette Road We are transmitting the following items: Drawing Revisions for 57 Fayette Road Site Plan Review Application TRANSMITTAL DESCRIPTION FROM: Kelley DesRoches Wiemann Lamphere Architects 802-655-5020 Wiiemann Lam here ARCHITECTS Wiemann Lam here ARCHITECTS May 2, 2018 Mr. Ray Belair South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT Re: 57 Fayette Road (previously 7 Fayette Road) Dear Ray, Please find attached our application for Site Plan Review for an existing commercial building located at 57 Fayette Road. This project is part of an existing Planned Unit Development, historically known as L&M Park. The Milot Larkin Partnership is proposing to repair and upgrade exterior building siding materials and sidewalk conditions that are in poor condition. The existing building use will remain as is with multiple commercial tenants. The existing floor area will increase slightly (approx. 153 sf) by re -enclosing a corner of the building that was once conditioned space to resolve water infiltration issues into the Sprinkler Room below. There are no changes to building height. The existing building fagade is made up of E.I.F.S. with a series of gable canopy entries to the tenant spaces. The proposed elevation changes are to repair & repaint existing E.I.F.S. along a majority of the building with the exception of the Concentra tenant space which will be re -clad with new vertical metal siding and horizontal clapboard siding. The existing canopies will be replaced with similar materials that coordinate with the new siding materials. There are minimal modifications to parking but no modifications to traffic flow. The changes to parking improves the handicap parking space locations & side aisle clearances. To accommodate the correct dimensional requirements of the handicap parking spaces there is one less parking space, see attached email from David Grover, RSG regarding shared parking calculations. The proposed sidewalk repairs will greatly improve accessible entry conditions to tenant spaces. Six additional bike parking spaces will be added. Please review the attached application and drawing for approval. Do not hesitate to contact us with questions or if you should require additional information. Sincerely, id Roy Wiemann Lamphere Ar itects, President Cc: Larkin Realty Krebs & Lansing Wagner Hodgson 525 Hercules Drive I Suite Two I Colchester, VT 05446 1 Phone: 802.655.5020 1 Fax: 802.655.6567 1 wiemannlamphere.com ray From: Dave Wheeler Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 12:45 PM To: ray Subject: RE: 57 Fayette Road Project Ray, I have reviewed and have no comments. I had already made the recommendation to maintain the gravel wetland under the Micro Apartments application, so no further conditions are needed. Thanks, Dave �a cid P �Ilieeler A sLtant Stormwater Superintendent Project Manager Department o ubLc 11'ort Notice - Under Vermont's public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing infirmatron relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: ray Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 8:11 AM To: Dave Wheeler <dwheeler@sburl.com> Subject: FW: 57 Fayette Road Project Dave, Just wondering if you'd had a chance to review the attached plans? Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under !Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City gfficial or stgff or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: ray Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 3:53 PM 1 To: Dave Wheeler <dwheeler sburl.com>; Craig Lambert <clambert sburl.com> Subject: 57 Fayette Road Project Dave & Craig, Please review the attached plans for some improvements to 57 Fayette Road. Let me know your comments. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. �yUl/ Permit Number SP- 19 ❑ Development Review Board 6 ' (office use only) All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, and phone): Larkin Milot Partnership, LLP, 410 Shelburne Road, Burlington, VT 05401 802-864-7444 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): vol. 336, pg. 437 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone): John Larkin, Inc., 410 Shelburne Road, Burlington, VT 05401 802-864-7444 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone): David Roy, Wiemann Lamphere Architects 525 Hercules D`r, Suite 2, Colchester, VT 05446, 802-655-5020 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS: droy@wiemannlamphere.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 57 Fayette Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1540-01125 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Remove exg pavement - install accessible sidewalk, remove exg concrete sidewalk - create paved special vehicle striped drop-off area, replace brick sidewalk w/ concrete sidewalk, new/relocated bike racks, add tree, enclose open corner of building, repair & paint exg E.I.F.S., partial re -cladding of building siding, replace exg entry canopies 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Existing commercial building with multiple tenants - uses are not changing. Existing Business uses comprise of Concentra Urgent Care (7,504 sf) and Artemis Fitness (3,491 sf). Assembly uses comprised of restaurants Zen Gardens (6,822 sf) and Smokey's (3,195 sf). Existing parking garage/storage use is approx. 18,152 sf and is not changing. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Existing uses to remain as explained above. 153 sf added to enclose corner of Concentra Urgent Care. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Existing building area 35,816 sf to remain. 153 sf proposed to be added to enclose corner of Concentra Urgent Care making the proposed total area approx. 35,969 sf. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Unchanged in this application f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): Unchanged in this application g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Unchanged in this application h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 5-2018 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 180,774 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 19.8 / / 35,819 sq. ft. Proposed 19.9 % / 35,969 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 60-9 % / 110,170 sq. ft. Proposed 60.6 / / 109,457 sq. ft. c. Front setback non -building coverage (along each street, commercial properties only) Existing 19.8 % / 5,836 sq. ft. Proposed 19.8 / / 5,836 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 2,750 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. New Building or Addition, including initial fit -up (if initial fit -up cost not available, contact Planning & Zoning staff): $ 315,000.00 b. Landscaping: $ c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): $10,000.00 for sidewalk, parking lot improvements, new tree and bike storage racks 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): unchanged in this application 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Unchanged in this application 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Unchanged in this application 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: November 2018 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF- format) copy of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 5-2018 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge, 60WURE OF APPLICANT SlN OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ElDevelopment Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ff Complete IM-7 The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 8 79-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 4 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ray To: rbelair@sburl.com Subject: FW: 57 Fayette Road Project Craig's comments are: The trees which are to be designated for protection need to be delineated on the plans. The proposed methods for tree protection and root pruning should be detailed on the plans. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-snail, a -mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. Ifyou have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return email. Thank you.for your cooperation. From: Craig Lambert Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 9:35 AM To: ray <ray@sburl.com> Subject: RE: 57 Fayette Road Project There in the comments on the landscaping plan(in the pdf). Click on the comments buttons Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clambert(a sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request., unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: ray Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 8:05 AM To: Craig Lambert <clambert@sburl.com> Subject: RE: 57 Fayette Road Project Craig, Deb Sherman From: David Grover <David.Grover@rsginc.com> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 9:39 AM To: Deb Sherman Cc: Skip McClellan Subject: Updated Parking Requirements for Larking Micro -Apartments Attachments: Shared Parking Calculations-7 Fayette 04-05-2018.pdf Hi Deb, The January 15, 2018 Traffic Impact Study for the Larkin Micro -Apartments examined shared parking for the L&M PUD and provided a parking analysis for the requested 16% parking waiver. Since that study was completed, there have been two changes to the plans that change the analysis but still require no more than a 16% waiver. The shared parking analysis found that peak parking demand will be in late December, on a weekday, between 8 and 10 PM. The two changes are: The gross floor area of the Concentra building will change from 8,586 square feet to 8,739 square feet. While this raised Concentra's individual parking needs from 43 spaces to 44 spaces, Concentra's parking needs stay at 5 spaces at the time of peak demand. Therefore, peak demand is still 692 spaces The available parking in the January 15, 2018 analysis was listed as 584 spaces. Changes in the site plan resulted in the loss of one space from what was planned, so the available spaces stand at 583. The original analysis calculated a required waiver of 15.6% ( (692-584)/692). With the 583 spaces available, the new required waiver is 15.8% ( (692-583)/692). Therefore, the micro -apartments as planned still fall within the requested 16% waiver. The updated shared parking analysis is attached. Please let me know if you need additional information, David ..................................................... DAVID GROVER, PE Senior Analyst RSG 180 Battery St., Suite 350 1 Burlington, VT 05401 802.861.0505 �.±nvt,^J. r s�,inc.com KREBS & L,ANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375, Fax 878-9618 email@krebsandlansing.com March 30, 2018 Dave Wheeler South Burlington Public Works 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 0503 RE: Fifty-seven Fayette Road — Stormwater Treatment South Burlington, Vermont Dear Dave, Milot-Larkin Partnership, LLC is proposing some small site improvements at the east side of their building at 57 Fayette Road in South Burlington. The improvements do not expand impervious but are redevelopment of existing impervious and require stormwater treatment per the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The site is highly developed so we used the site balancing approach to offset the stormwater treatment for this project. The Gravel Wetland that will be constructed as part of the adjacent Micro Residential project contains additional capacity. The watershed that currently drains to the practice will be expanded to capture and treat currently untreated existing impervious. A new catch basin, with a 4-foot-deep sump for pre-treatment, will be used to collect and pipe the additional runoff to the gravel wetland. The stormwater system will provide the required WQv treatment by filtering through the soil and within the voids of the stone. The post development peak discharge rate for both the 1-year and 25-year storm events will be detained to rates less than existing conditions. The revised plans, calculations, and model are attached for your review. The project includes 1,346 s.f. of redevelopment or substantially reconstructed impervious. The off -site area that will be captured and treated is identified at WS #3 on the attached stormwater plan. This watershed includes 2,375 s.fof impervious area for site balancing use. After this project, there will be a reserve of 1,029 s.f. for future redevelopment or substantial reconstruction use. Please feel free to call with any questions, or comments you may have. Thank you for your assistance with this project. Sincerely, Derick M. Read Enclosure CC: Joe Larkin/Deb Sherman 15300.1\Stormw2ter\Letter to Dave Wheeler 3-30-18.doe Page 1 of 1 // ' /' ' /' ' 11 �'' , / I ---'% , Vel'J•f �� 1', r__' - .—_— —— ———— ' 7� r --'--- ---'-- --------- �----'-------------:C= \7 -_ _ 0 -----�� rc- r�y� —j-------------------= =i_ ` — = >� ` -- - - - - - \ \ -- ffe 203. 15 9�-peters it II r== Redevelopment/Reconstruction: _ wow wo/t, Change brick to concrete ;-ter = _ _ - - - - I\- L___-- _ Dot hatch indicates new \ Remove dip in curb / I asphalt _ _ - aspasill _ Install handicap ramp - - - - - - - - - - - Change concrete to asphalt I C8 D/-99 ,./ I `,^ �► ::..- - - - - - - Rim 201.55 _ _ _ -- - - _ �I I� dumpiter Rebuild entry pad v out 197.09' �.., I Shim asphalt to grade ' ill II 1072 sq.ft. ill Ij r-- I I gfe &t4�jNL Y" I - L - - - ' - � � - - - I/; � � I'-� Existing Commercial Building r '` - I? ,-- ' III �`=_ _ ___ ffe / I III � 203.15 I Reconstruction: ,I Remove concrRedevelopment/afe sidewalk. Install handicap ramp Install aspIt loading area W---_-, +,o--'. _ - - 4 Change asphalt to concreteIll- // /1 mop/ell \\ _� Add curb /^,---------- 260 sq.ft. ' r r 5 _ +2., 0�\ a�" h 1r - - / yr\ ' 1P '0 e \ r \I I / th erry —1----J r- - - - - - - ---------- - - - - - --- ----- ' `\\i 12.. III I I I Fr=----I-----1� I Tom/ y 1herr --— — —JJII ' ✓ p I I I Wo Ua AMPIl l a I r- ' CB DI-17 II I}I yI Rill 202.00' 202 IrJJl//Jl�J Inv in 196. 7' 18" Redevelopment/Reconstructior�03 ' hll�/�11L// Inv out 19115.6' (24) �i u f +chery I% 1 � Add trench drain (2) I ,' I �Ir---ll f-----! ---- 7 ft.+E s � 1 / II , q Il------- I �" -501 Y_ I - ,\, I =_• JII , I I ,' - ---I41 ---/- III I.'�-- ' A- - ,\ --------'AI II\ IV / \ II I I IL- -- ' I �','4'P1e q II I I I II ---------��- i' 0' 20' 40' 60' ----t-� ''r--------- it Bar Scale >" = 2o' , II 7 I, III II LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE South Burlington Stormwater REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 15300.3/DWGS/15300.3 57 Fayette Site Plans.dwg DRAWN BY: SLM PROJECT NO: KL=15300.3 DATE: 4/11 /1 S REVISED: SCALE: 1" = 20' SB ST-1 Project Phase PERMIT DRAWINGS ONLY 7 Fayette Drive Stormwater Calculations December 21, 2017 February 27, 2018 Revised March 29, 2018 Page 1 of 2 Version: 9/06 For the area draining to*: 7 Fayette - Gravel Wetland Located in drainage area for S/N: 1001 WQ Volume and Modified Curve Number Calculation for Water Quality Treatment in Flow -Based Practice Use this worksheet to calculate your WQv if you need to determine the Peak Q for the WQ storm (i.e. designing a grass channel, flow-splitter or other flow based practice) and you are not using any of the site design credits in section 3 of the 2002 VSWMM. See page 2 for "Calculating Peak WQ Discharge Rate (0.9" storm) using the Modified Curve Number. " Please note that in the case of grass channels you must include any off -site area draining to the practice as this will affect the peak discharge rate which will ultimately affect the hydraulics, and thus residence time, in your channel. Water Quality Volume Calculations Line value/calculation units 1 Area draining to practice A= 0.40 Notes: 1: Sites with low impervious cover ( -19%) but that do not employ a significant use of the stormwater design credits in Section 3 of the VSWMM are required to treat the minimum water quality volume of 0.2 watershed inches. Sites that have a significant portion of their impervious cover addressed via the stormwater credits (section 3 of the VSWMM) will be able to reduce this WQv and will only be required to treat the volume calculated on the "WQ Volume (with credit reduction)" worksheet which will be less than the 0.2 watershed inches. Required WQv = 1,234 cu.ft. Surface area of stone for Gravel Wetland = 1,275 s.f. Stone depth = 2.5 ft. Assume 40% void ratio in stone Storage Volume in Stone: 1,275 s.f. * 2.5 ft. * 0.4 = 1,275 cu.ft. WQv contained in permanent pool * Enter the name of the STP (both type and label) which has been designed to treat this particular WQv (e.g. Wet Pond #2) Page 2 of 2 Version: 9/06 For the area draining to*: 7 Fayette - Gravel Wetland Located in drainage area for S/N: 001 Calculating Peak WQ Peak Discharge Rate (0.9" storm) using the Modified Curve Number Because NRCS methods underestimate the peak discharge for rainfall events of less than 2", simply plugging in 0.9" of rainfall into your hydrologic model with the standard curve numbers will not produce the correct peak discharge during the WQv storm, nor will it produce a volume of runoff equivalent to that which you have calculated using the WQv formula (WQv = P*Rv*A/12). In order to calculate the peak discharge for the 0.9" storm, a modified curve number must be calculated. This modified curve number is based on the runoff (in inches) calculated using the short cut method formula (WQv = P*Rv) that is also the basis of the familiar WQv calculations provided in the 2002 VSWMM (and on the WQv calculation worksheets). Essentially, the curve number that is calculated using the methods below is the curve number that will generate the volume of runoff calculated using the WQv formula. Above, you should have calculated the WQv in watershed inches draining to the facility/practice for which you need to calculate the WQ- peak discharge. As provided in the guidance listed on the grass channel worksheet, please remember that the WQv calculation should include runoff from on -site as well as off -site area draining to the grass channel since this will have an impact on the channel hydraulics and thus the velocity and residence time. Steps: 1. Transfer information from WQv calculation worksheets. Enter the Qa ( line 8 from WQv sheet) Qa = 0.693 inches Enter the area (site +off -site draining to practice) used in calculating the percent impervious (I) A = 0.4 acres 2. Use the following equation to calculate a corresponding curve number where P = 0.9 inches CN=1000/(10 +(5*P)+(10*Qa) - (10*(QaA2 + (1.25*Qa*P))^0.5)) CN = 98.0 3. If you are using hand hydrologic runoff calculations, use the computed CN above along with your calculated time of concentration and the drainage area (A) to calculate the peak discharge (Qwq) for the water quality storm using the TR-55 Graphical Peak Discharge Method. OR 3. If you are using a computer aided hydrologic model, simply revise the curve number for your subwatershed(s) draining to the practice using the curve number calculated above; the computed curve number should be applied to the total area (A) used in the WQv calcuation. As a check, you should note that now when you run the 0.9" storm, your runoff depth should be roughly equal to Qa (WQ runoff in inches) and your total runoff volume roughly equal to your WQv (in ac. ft.). If this is not the case, make sure that the time span for your modelling run is long enough to capture the entire storm. Small variations are likely due to having to round your computed CN to a whole number. Remember that for storms larger than 2", you do not need to use the modified curve number and you should calculate your composite curve number based on the accepted values for different types of land -use (see TR-55). * Enter the name of the STP (both type and label) which has been designed to treat this particular WQv (e.g. Wet Pond #2) 7 Fayette Drive -Hydrologic Model - WQv WQv Model WS-1 G-Wetland 'Subcat Reach on Link WS-3 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10 00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Project Notes 7 Fayette Drive Hydrologic Model Revised 2-27-2018 Revised 3-29-2018 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 sh 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Area Listing (selected nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchmen t-numbers) 0.079 98 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (WS-1, WS-2, WS-3) 0.316 98 Impervious (WS-1, WS-2, WS-3) 0.395 98 TOTAL AREA 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr WQv Rainfall= 1. 00" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment WS-1: WS-1 Runoff = 0.40 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 0.79" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=1.00" - "----[Modified Curve Number Area (so CN DescriN * 2,450 98 >` % Grass cover, Good, HSG D * 9,220 98 Impervious 11,670 Weighted Average 11,670 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.8 45 0.0150 0.89 Sheet Flow, Roof Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.8 45 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 1.0 min Subcatchment WS-1: WS-1 Hydrograph ■ Runoff 11 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 55 56 60 Time (hours) 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 1124-hr WQv Rainfall=1.00" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment WS-2: WS-2 Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.004 af, Depth= 0.79" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=1.00" Modified Curve Number Area (so CN Description 360 98 51/o Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,060 98 Impervious 2,420 Weighted Average 2,420 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.0 75 0.0270 1.24 Sheet Flow, Pavement Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 N u 0.05 3 0.045 _o 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 Subcatchment WS-2: WS-2 Hydrograph 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Runoff 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 1124-hr WQv Rainfall= 1. 00 " Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment WS-3: WS-3 Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.005 af, Depth= 0.79" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=1.00" Modified Curve Areas CN Desc ioNumber 635 98 75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,495 98 Impervious 3,130 Weighted Average 3,130 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 4.1 17 0.0200 0.07 Sheet Flow, Grass Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.5 89 0.0220 3.01 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SC Pavement Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 4.6 106 Total 0. 0. C 0. C 0. C 0. w C U 30. _o C u_ 0. C 0. 0. 0. 0. Subcatchment WS-3: WS-3 Hydrograph 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Runoff 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type // 24-hr WQv Rainfall= 1. 00" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 i HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Peak Elevation of Summary for Pond GRVL-W: G-Wetland WQv Storm f Inflow Ar a = 0.395 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.79" for WQv event Plug -Flow detention time= 199.9 min calculated for 0.026 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 199.9 min ( 980.5 - 780.6 ) Inflow = 0.57 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.026 of Outflow = 0.06 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af, Atten= 89%, Lag= 15.7 min Discarded 0.01 cfs @ 10.83 hrs, Volume= 0.020 of Primary - 0.05 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Routing by S\r-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev= 187.87' @ 12.17 hrs Surf.Area= 1,407 sf Storage= 502 cf Volume Invert #1 187.50' Avail.Storaae Storaae Descriation 1,785 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 187.50 1,275 0 0 188.70 1,700 1,785 1,785 Device #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Invert Outlet Devices Depth of Stone in Gravel Wetland = 2.5 ft. Storage Volume = 1,275 cu.ft. (1,275 s.f. (surface area) * 2.5 ft. * 0.4 (void space)) Discarded 187.50' 0.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area below 187.51' Primary 187.70' 0.5" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 4.00 C= 0.600 Primary 187.85' 6.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 2.00 C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary 188.15' 2.0" x 2.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 24.0" Grate (1 % open area) Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary 188.50' 10.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Qiscarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 10.83 hrs HW=187.51' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.17 hrs HW=187.87' (Free Discharge) 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.01 cfs @ 1.88 fps) 3=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.04 cfs @ 0.51 fps) =Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) =Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 1124-hr WQv Rainfall= 1. 00' Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Pond GRVL-W: G-Wetland Hydrograph [1 Inflow Outflow t� Discarded [7, Primary 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) 1 year Storm - Hydrologic Model 16192,1 ..Ca 2S SS 3S EX-1 EX-2 EX-3 WS-1 W 2 WS-3 WS-1 Exist g WS-2 xisting S-3 Existing 6L 3P (new Link) G-Wetland Bob4 Reach on L ink 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Project Notes 7 Fayette Drive Hydrologic Model Revised 2-27-2018 Revised 3-29-2018 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Area Listing (selected nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (s u bcatch me nt- n u m be rs) 0.135 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (2S, 3S, EX-1, EX-2) 0.023 98 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (5S, EX-3) 0.632 98 Impervious (2S, 3S, 5S, EX-1, EX-2, EX-3) 0.791 95 TOTAL AREA 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type /l 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: WS-1 Runoff = 0.78 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.036 af, Depth= 1.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (so CN Description 2,450 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 9,220 98 Impervious 11,670 Weighted Average 2,450 20.99% Pervious Area 9,220 79.01% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.8 45 0.0150 0.89 Sheet Flow, Roof Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.8 45 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 1.0 min 0 0 0 0 0 3 o u- 0. 0. 0. 0. Subcatchment 2S: WS-1 Hydrograph 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Runoff 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HvdroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 5 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: WS-3 Runoff = 0.19 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.010 af, Depth= 1.62" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (so CN Description 635 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,495 98 Impervious 3,130 Weighted Average 635 20.29% Pervious Area 2,495 79.71% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 4.1 17 0.0200 0.07 Sheet Flow, Grass Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.5 89 0.0220 3.01 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SC Pavement Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 4.6 106 Total Subcatchment 3S: WS-3 Hydrograph ■ Runoff 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type Il 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 H droCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment 5S: WS-2 Runoff = 0.19 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.009 af, Depth= 1.87" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Description 360 98 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,060 98 Impervious 2,420 Weighted Average 2,420 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.7 50 0.0270 1.14 Sheet Flow, Pavement Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.7 50 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 1.0 min 0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 y 0.1 0.1 0 0. LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Subcatchment 5S: WS-2 Hydrograph Time (hours) ■ Runoff 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type // 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment EX-1: WS-1 Existing Runoff = 0.78 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.036 af, Depth= 1.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (so CN Description 2,450 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 9,220 98 Impervious 11,670 Weighted Average 2,450 20.99% Pervious Area 9,220 79.01% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.8 45 0.0150 0.89 Sheet Flow, Pavement Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.8 45 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 1.0 min Subcatchment EX-1: WS-1 Existing Hydrograph ■ Runoff 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 1124-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment EX-2: WS-2 Existing Runoff = 0.17 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.008 af, Depth= 1.69" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Description 360 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,060 98 Impervious 2,420 Weighted Average 360 14.88% Pervious Area 2,060 85.12% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.0 75 0.0270 1.24 Sheet Flow, Pavement Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.1 0 0.09 L- 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 0 Subcatchment EX-2: WS-2 Existing Hydrograph 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Runoff 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment EX-3: WS-3 Existing Runoff = 0.22 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.011 af, Depth= 1.87" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Description 635 98 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,495 98 Impervious 3,130 Weighted Average 3,130 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 4.1 17 0.0200 0.07 Sheet Flow, Grass Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.5 89 0.0220 3.01 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SC Pavement Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 4.6 106 Total 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 y 0.14 0.13 3 0.12 ° 0.11 LL 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 0 Subcatchment EX-3: WS-3 Existing Hydrograph 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Runoff 7 Fayette Storm, Prepared by Krebs HvdroCADO 10.00-19 Post Development Peak Discharae Rate , later -Gravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 s/n 06429 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 10 Summary for Pond 3P: G-Wetland Inflow Area = 0 395 ac, 82.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.65" for 1 Year event Inflow = 1. 3 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.054 of Outflow = 0. 4 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.054 af, Atten= 26%, Lag= 2.9 min Discarded = 0. cfs @ 8.85 hrs, Volume= 0.028 of Primary = 0.82 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev= 188.04' @ 11.96 hrs Surf.Area= 1,465 sf Storage= 734 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 142.9 min calculated for 0.054 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 142.8 min ( 908.1 - 765.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 187.50' 1,785 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 187.50 1,275 0 0 188.70 1,700 1,785 1,785 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 187.50' 0.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area below 187.51' #2 Primary 187.70' 0.5" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 4.00 C= 0.600 #3 Primary 187.85' 6.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 2.00 C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #4 Primary 188.15' 2.0" x 2.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 24.0" Grate (1 % open area) Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Primary 188.50' 10.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Qiscarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 8.85 hrs HW=187.51' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary Out low Max=0.82 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=188.03' (Free Discharge) 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.01 cfs @ 2.69 fps) 3=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.81 cfs @ 1.40 fps) =Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) =Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 u 3 0 LL Pond 3P: G-Wetland Hydrograph 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Inflow Outflow ■ Discarded ® Primary Existing Conditions, Peak Discharge Rath 7 Fayette Stormwat r-Gravel Wetland -Build -out Type // 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Krebs & I ansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/r 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 12 Summary for Link 6L: (new Link) Inflow Area = 0.395 ac, 83.68% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.67" for 1 Year event Inflow = 1.14 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.055 of Primary = 1.14 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.055 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs y 3 0 LL Link 6L: (new Link) Hydrograph F 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Inflow ■ Primary WS-1 25 year storm - Hydrologic Model Post Development CPv Model (j) n3S WS-3 G-Wetland Subcaf Reach on Link Existing Conditions EX-1 EX-2 WS-1 Exist g WS-2 xisting t✓ 6L (new Link) Existing 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Project Notes 7 Fayette Drive Hydrologic Model Revised 2-27-2018 Revised 3-29-2018 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Area Listing (selected nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchmen t-numbers) 0.135 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (2S, 3S, EX-1, EX-2) 0.023 98 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (5S, EX-3) 0.632 98 Impervious (2S, 3S, 5S, EX-1, EX-2, EX-3) 0.791 95 TOTAL AREA 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: WS-1 Runoff = 1.55 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.073 af, Depth= 3.26" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Area (so CN Description 2,450 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 9,220 98 Impervious 11,670 Weighted Average 2,450 20.99% Pervious Area 9,220 79.01% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.8 45 0.0150 0.89 Sheet Flow, Roof Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.8 45 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 1.0 min Subcatchment 2S: WS-1 Hydrograph L 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Runoff 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: WS-3 Runoff = 0.37 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, Depth= 3.27" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Area (so CN Description 635 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,495 98 Impervious 3,130 Weighted Average 635 20.29% Pervious Area 2,495 79.71 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 4.1 17 0.0200 0.07 Sheet Flow, Grass Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.5 89 0.0220 3.01 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SC Pavement Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 4.6 106 Total y 3 0 u- Subcatchment 3S: WS-3 Hydrograph - -- - --Time (hours)_ ■ Runoff 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type // 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10 00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment 5S: WS-2 Runoff = 0.35 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.017 af, Depth= 3.62" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Area (sf) CN Description 360 98 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,060 98 Impervious 2,420 Weighted Average 2,420 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.7 50 0.0270 1.14 Sheet Flow, Pavement Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.7 50 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 1.0 min Subcatchment 5S: WS-2 Hydrograph ■ Runoff 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 4ti 46 00 0[ 54 ao ac ou Time (hours) 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment EX-1: WS-1 Existing Runoff = 1.55 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.073 af, Depth= 3.26" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Area (sf) CN Description 2,450 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 9,220 98 Impervious 11,670 Weighted Average 2,450 20.99% Pervious Area 9,220 79.01% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.8 45 0.0150 0.89 Sheet Flow, Pavement Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.8 45 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 1.0 min Subcatchment EX-1: WS-1 Existing Hvdroaranh /.L 0 Z 4 b 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Runoff 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type/1 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCADO 10 00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment EX-2: WS-2 Existing Runoff = 0.33 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.016 af, Depth= 3.36" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Area (so CN Description 360 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,060 98 Impervious 2,420 Weighted Average 360 14.88% Pervious Area 2,060 85.12% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.0 75 0.0270 1.24 Sheet Flow, Pavement Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" N U 3 0 LL Subcatchment EX-2: WS-2 Existing Hydrograph 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 4b 4b ou bt 514 oo ao ov Time (hours) ■ Runoff 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 06429 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment EX-3: WS-3 Existing Runoff = 0.41 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.022 af, Depth= 3.62" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Area (sf) CN Description 635 98 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,495 98 Impervious 3,130 Weighted Average 3,130 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 4.1 17 0.0200 0.07 Sheet Flow, Grass Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.5 89 0.0220 3.01 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SC Pavement Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 4.6 106 Total Subcatchment EX-3: WS-3 Existing Hydrograph ■ Runoff u z 4 b 8 1u 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) Post Development Peak Discharge Rate 7 Fayette Stc rmwater-Gravel Wetland -Build -out Type // 24-hr 25 Year Karntall=3. db" I Prepared by Ki bs & Lansing Consulting Engineers ( Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HvdroCAD® 10.00 19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Pond 3P: G-Wetland Inflow Area = 0.395 ac, 82.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.31" for 25 Year event Inflow = 2 22 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.109 of Outflow = 1., 7 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.109 af, Atten= 38%, Lag= 3.8 min Discarded = 0., cfs @ 5.25 hrs, Volume= 0.034 of Primary = 1.35 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.075 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs Peak Elev= 188.31' (N 11.97 hrs Surf.Area= 1,561 sf Storage= 1,146 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 104.0 min calculated for 0.109 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 104.0 min ( 857.1 - 753.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 187.50' 1,785 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 187.50 1,275 0 0 188.70 1,700 1,785 1,785 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 187.50' 0.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area below 187.51' #2 Primary 187.70' 0.5" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 4.00 C= 0.600 #3 Primary 187.85' 6.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 2.00 C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #4 Primary 188.15' 2.0" x 2.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 in 24.0" x 24.0" Grate (1 % open area) Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Primary 188.50' 10.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Qiscarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 5.25 hrs HW=187.51' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary Out low Max=1.35 cfs @ 11.97 hrs HW=188.31' (Free Discharge) 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.02 cfs @ 3.69 fps) 3=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 1.28 cfs @ 3.25 fps) 4=Orif ice/G rate (Orifice Controls 0.05 cfs @ 1.91 fps) =Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 7 Fayette Stormwater-G ravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 06429 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 0 Pond 3P: G-Wetland Hydrograph u z 4 0 u 10 12 14 lb 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) 13 Inflow Outflow ■ Discarded ■ Primary Existing Conditions Peak Discharae Rate 7 Fayette Storm% Prepared by Krebs HvdroCADO 10.00-19 ter -Gravel Wetland -Build -out Type 11 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=3.85" Lansing Consulting Engineers Revised 3-29-18 Printed 3/29/2018 naa9ca n gn1R HvHrr)( An Software Solutions LLC Paae 12 Summary for Link 6L: (new Link) Inflow Area = 0.395 ac, 83.68% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.34" for 25 Year event Inflow = 2.23 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.110 of Primary = 2.23 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.110 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.03 hrs U 3 0 LL Link 6L: (new Link) Hydrograph 2.23 cfs n I r 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Time (hours) ■ Inflow ■ Primary --------------- - ------------- r M , _ 4 r --- - - ' / y 1. - - I ----------------- 4a Ir ------- r -- CIVIL ENGINEER Existing Commercial Building ~------------------- ---- ,r kreheatename conevumg En9moon, Inc, 1 -- -- eGMaN....tng Engi1 see Architectural p improvements 1 crcaoz e7841375 � ------------- --------- _/_/ _ For building cede ements el la �-; , / - r --- ' e E: telce aTseata mail®krebcentllaneln8-c Repair/place existing metal i , 53 taus and concrete pad if Existing entrance to remain I _ _ 1 -'-;' - "'iJ` n I 3 cr..dlr'Z r I- ^' 1 I annmmr,i needed. No base work. 1 \ - - - - _ _ _ I 1 e OF VEq�ri-r. _T___ H. K^��8 ` n , _ - -- v '",„r % 1 I / `--- ;); _ 1 New "Special Vehicle" area with sign _ _ _ --i s r: \ % e I \ , iB¢4�1, .' mom^`, - ____ _�` __ � 1111 r \ j . I' / +am \ Ite.+r -----� FOR PERMIT REVIEW Add rip -rap %----- b I\ *`. `n.+A �\ ,. \ \„>�' "MiA. 'vr.,.'•' �' '------ -'v -1 , ^�>rc� w�J- ,.•, _ /--- New CB 1 _ , , -�� F -�=- 55\ `\ \ �. �__{�rp' _ I II _ _ ____ _yf �__________tf________ \ `\\ �� \ 4ar ` A 1 I I - - \ \ x`` `n\ - ________ I 1 _________ 4\ ', \�, ux ``.i i` ' /\brrY ~ _ 11 I 1 I "--------Ir l / � � ,_ tiFIFTY SEVEN \\O °" / / FAYETTE ROAD , \\ ,✓\ \, .. J' / :, - Route South \\ \ \ , \� ,\ .. # \ \•; _ / .=...aa.p -.4yA II -or r — - �- -== 7 Bulingon,VTd , , .. ,�_______ \ ______ _IIIO4__- _________ I _ re ea , _________ r �✓ \ . \ �\. '`. � gin' l� .''1' 1 I I ''I; • ii _ _ _ � 1 . "Cl ."`o „1 ----- r,a. - — —a— — ----- N0. DESCRIPTION DATE I ' -- a et - - F-st- 1 Revise layout, relocate special 5/29/1a / I ------------------- \\ 2 Add snow stce, mvise orage, talcs \ \` \r,/'\ i I _________ spa m ` / / I; _ _ _ u tion Seise cub, e/14/1 a I-r---------• \ \ \ ♦. `� ^"'dnr , `,ii Lci II �'i / _________ .________ ________- ___ ___ 1 3 Construction Set 8/1e/1e `. `4\ \ ♦ v a`r``` 1 ii I \ _ I., _________ _____ 84 /+ ---- CONTENT xrroraar "' 1 °" ru'°a _______ 1 Repair existing handicap ramp ----' :"'r"rarfririnli�',�Lr�14 I GENERAL NOTES ` \ I .40'\ \ \ '\ ` �: -• ' b -�- I I, luuuuu + \ In \ _ This plan is not a boundary survey. Boundary Information shown was taken from a drawing ` \ \ \ \ _ _ _ -'"'- "hy" r• "- - entitled 'Boundary Survey Lot D of L&M Park' by Krebs and Lansing, completed in September 9.ZD1T. CIVIL SITE PLAN New railing on existing WOOCt St�lr6't I ' -------- Surface utility Information shown is based on an existing features survey conducted by Krebs c` __ l I and Lansing. er' 0 Underground utilities areapproximate and not warranted to be exact or complete. Contractor �c` - -- -- - a, i I� shall eonmct New England Dig Safe Prior to any excavations. a LEGEND \,r I' - ` \ a +a4a ` ; \ \ ,s: ,, d r ' `e `_ I' li I1;� The location e. of r electrical electrical lines which service the site lights are not shown on the _ ` ; mmb� f � \ \ \ \ a, \ d gp' r \� Civil Plena. Other electrical Ilnes may axial which are not shown on this plan. -._ so Survey Control Point\ r Mfg I_________ }-I-� > I ^ -' All Civil Site and Civil Lhiliry design extends from beyond 5 ft. outside the buildings. 300.3 57 F. it. Ss. w....a.g -, - Existing Sign }, \ \ "�` _ _ ' Contractor shall see Architectural, Structural, and Mechanical Plans for all design within 5 ft of s \ r ', I' the building.DRAWN BY'. SLM � Existing Light Pole � � \+\ \ ' \ ' ``, ^ ^ ` _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r _ I I. Existing Deciduous Tree a '` �., F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ Contractor responsible for all pavemem markings shown or implied on the plans. PROJECT No. l<r-15soo a I \ \ \ \ d `_ _ • e Existing Evergreen Tree , \ :;w+ � The Contractor shall be responsible for all erosion prevention and sediment control measures Existing Gas Line/Valve � ' / ♦ \ � � _, - ` - _ - , - 4 T �--9y{ - - - - necessary ro comply with the Low Risk Construction General Permit and as outlined outlined DATE 517118 - -- s�-ram—a— in the Low Risk Site Handbook for Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control. Existing Sewer Line/Manhole \ \ --____ --- ---- �++ - REVISED: - - J \ \ \ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _-"_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The pavement and restoration shown may not include all restoration necessaryto Complete Existing Storm Line/Manhole/Basin r \ \, ua��_„ Y --"'" the ility work. The Contractor shall be responsible for repairing all P `. =d r # I p g pavement and subbase SCALE. 1' = 2Y Existing Overhead Power/Power PoleL ! -e--- __ I - necessary to complete the work. — usP — - Existing Underground Power P f/� Existing Communications Une m.n '� '\ - -1s- _ �I -8- - S1 ` Existing Water Line _ _ \�' \ \ - APPting ate Pror Lineny Line 0 20' 40" BO' 120' Project Phase — — — — — Existing Easement ' \"� m - - CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ` Existing Setback ` � �Ir` , ua-_ -• _ I -ra _, - BOi .S(wds I- ZO' -- ua- - - - - Existing Underdrain o w N � w s CI MN ARCHITECTS 525 Hercules Drive Suite Two Colchester, VT 05446 802.655.5020 802.622.6567 I�� aO N W NEW 1411E HANDRAIL W Ln NO. DATE: REIM 1 6119118 Rc W- i z 0 E z m D 0 N May 5, 2018 Finn naaTn ... Ef N 3/;2,. N 2017 a5 MR/KD K0 SHFETIIRE. LEVEL 1 PLAN A1.01 PROVIDE)VNCTION BOX FOR FUIVRE SIGN LIGHTING, Y TYPICAL ATALL 5IGNAGE LOCATIONS. 1 4 g4 ARDh, REUSE EXISTING, CIRCUITS WHERE P05SIBLE 3 3 3VtO P. A3.10 �.. A310 A3.10 - A3.10 ,,\/�_ A3.10 \ (! QY10 • rt*} n "� " TENANT 5IGNAGE, TENANT 5IGNAGE. A310 ATERIALI f,. 1005F MAX. MATERIALI • T .. ... .. 100IF MAX. MATERIALS TERIAL 2 y�'Vp. 2153 MATERIAL 5 �MATERIAL 1 r _....._,. r ..._ _ i _ _ n ", I H _ _ _ _ I.' :', • Cp MATERIAL3 _.._ III �_ _. __.L_'JIj�r_.:_ _. .. .._ �_`. MA P.O C4 ` '.-- - -'_'._ ALIGN W/H Al,+OSTORFi..-„k a .` B1 ,• ., ,. . 0 24" HIGH SIGN 24" HIGH SIGN !, 24" HIGH SIGN. „ o B A7ERIAL3 Wiemann --- - 1 } .uv� • >,,. W I � �15 HIGH SIGN MATERIAL 1 MATERIALS _.._ I r I I iff(I here MATERIAL 4 u N _.— —.- _-. -- ow MATERIAL4 LEVEL1 IXII. NI) CONCRETE BASE TO NEW NEW WIN SOLYX PATTERN ED FILM. OBSCURING FROSTED FILM—SVRFACEMOVNTEDLED SURFACE MOUNTED LED S OWN L MOUNTED LED FOOTPRINT TYPICAL DOWN LIGHTGI UNDERSIDE 2 DOWN LIC,HTG, UNDERSIDE SIZE TON TC41 MATERIAL2 PATTERN TO BE 5 SOLVX 5XL-1017 CLEAR FINE BRVSHEI' DAWN LIGHTS UNDERSIDE OF CANOPIES-LIGHTOLIER A3.70 OF CANOPIES-LIGHTOLIER EXG SELECTED BY ARCH A31 OF CANOPIES - LIGHTOLIER 3 57R SLIM SURFACE 7"ROVND 3 57R SLIM SURFACE 7'ROUND 3 4 TMP' 57R SLIM SURFACE 7"ROUND A3.10 1 A3.10 A3.10 A3.10 r(A i31EAST (NEW) A3.10 - ARCHITECTS .Oz 1"-10'-0' 525 Hercules Drive Suite Two Colchester, VT 05446 802.655.5020 802.622.6567 wiemannlamphere.com DVWqWINr"OW, MATERIALLEVEL1 203'-6" WOOD SCREENFIREVEV I. CONNE CLEAN & PAINT EXG FXI� N1 7NIG<,5'r DECKINGOPEN TO RASEMENTLEVEL STRUCTURE OF DECK �.I ,PARKING. 193�_6' $O VTH_CNEW)-- z O f1J Q1 a02i 7 r j OG MATERIALS A3.7 A3.10 W _ k p rt —MATERIAL a r:v 0 .... ... _.__ Ix4 CEDAR BOARDS Ln Z I I I � LE_VELI d, O OPEN i0 CLEAN AND PAINT .PARKING- - EXI571NG STEEL DECKING AND STRUCTURE a_)WEST(NEW) MATERIAL KEY MARK MATERIAL MATERIALI STANDING SEAM VERTICAL METAL SIDING, COLOR: MATERIAL2 HORIZONTAL 51DINGI-AEPSPAN, PERCEPTION COLLECTION, PC40 12, COLOR: MATERIALS HORIZONTAL SIDING 2- AEP SPAN, PERCEPTION COLLECTION, PC40 12, COLOR: MATERIAL VENEERSTONE -BORALVER5ETTA5TONE, LEDGE5TONE, COLOR: MATERIALS EX15TING E.I.F.S.-REPAIR AS REC'D&PAINT �IhG, Ex POSFI� CONCRE�ti � i 6/19/13 Revizbn, EXG RVILDING MOUNTED REMOVE & REPLACE LIGHT FIXTURE STEEL STAIR EXG BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE _..i. 1 F -;,' EXG BVILDING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE �,. ,.•� �h.l�.._..r /•�l,i 1• _i_.. �. EXG KITCHEN EXHAUST FAN EXG EXHAUST VENTS WTr. -._ .f........_. _..-....... May 5, 201P MATERIALS E''�' �E'^'''`'�""""''-��JICT 1 1 .... �r' ..I MATERIALI Fi_._..J' � 1b " xEn rv017045 MAR/KD KD nnru. n ELEVATIONS - GRADE .w.-, lY.._M...i....� ;.:. ._..___ LEVELI NEW NEW UIIIIIf���plll �, �, 203, _ 6, BASEMENT LEVEL swEET r,oMrEx i�NOUH (NEW) .02 i"-10'-_0" EXG GAS _— METEK1 193 -6° A2.02 ------------------- ErFlh6. concrete curb Install structural concrete pad. Se: I I Remove existing flush curb. �kgin new concrete curb ------------ PRIOR TO REVISION THIS PARKING SPACE SPACE HC ACCESSIBLE. ---------- CIVIL ENGINEER THE REVISED PLAN LEAVES THE SPACE AS Sidewalk. Resurface with mt. 16,1 Main Sti S.to 20 1 lo, (no base work) IS THEREFORE NO NEW SPACE ADDED. - End new curb m.fl@kra�iird.rairii Dot hatch indicatep shim pavement as needed no base work) THIS STRIPED AREA WILL BE 197.09'08-) LABELED "SPECIAL VEHICLE NO 5703" Re -paint lines T required ONLY" WHICH ALLOWS A ------- SPACE FOR AMBULANCE OR DELIVERY VEHICLE. nd dispose of concrete shim. FOR PERMIT REVIEW Remove a Slidin Heavier score lines indicate expansion joints (itylo.), So Enclose existing triangular pl— area. Convertto incloorspace Install flush curb Dotted lines indicate proposed 0.10'contours and ramp 'No Parking�Sfpectal Existing concretelaiphalt Vehicle Only".ig. Remove b... and fill with to grass/landscaping. Relocate existing FD Storz connection to new a ter wall. New Strip. for �. P/arking area FIFTY SEVEN appropriate soil. See Sao Mechanical dwg. topsoil specifications OS 't,' and curb Shown. Pitv"Ith Landscape plans Remove existing curb South Burlington, VT Install three bicycle Repfove existing loop. in 'p-oreto curb Landscape dnewing. I Sawcut existing NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 Revise layout, relocate special 5/29/18 Start new curb. Space, rovis. cover cal.. �Existing tree for am. ------------- ---- concrete sidewalk to existing concrete, So existing Pin new con We wout concrete aid ,rate J 6 Existing catch basin to remain -------- sid— cra� curb E-1 ting, agichalt to concrete Ll�ewalk. Replace base and resurface. New handicap ign:_,r— ----------------------- Now concrete curb handicap sfpace� ---------------- Existing flush curb to rormilin, CIVIL SITE PLAN ain. Repetir as needed, ----------------- ----------------- DRAwN BY PROJECT NO Klh=1530,1 3 ----------------- DATE 517,18 REVISED i, PERMIT DRAWINGS End new curb m.fl@kra�iird.rairii Dot hatch indicatep shim pavement as needed no base work) THIS STRIPED AREA WILL BE 197.09'08-) LABELED "SPECIAL VEHICLE NO 5703" Re -paint lines T required ONLY" WHICH ALLOWS A ------- SPACE FOR AMBULANCE OR DELIVERY VEHICLE. nd dispose of concrete shim. FOR PERMIT REVIEW Remove a Slidin Heavier score lines indicate expansion joints (itylo.), So Enclose existing triangular pl— area. Convertto incloorspace Install flush curb Dotted lines indicate proposed 0.10'contours and ramp 'No Parking�Sfpectal Existing concretelaiphalt Vehicle Only".ig. Remove b... and fill with to grass/landscaping. Relocate existing FD Storz connection to new a ter wall. New Strip. for �. P/arking area FIFTY SEVEN appropriate soil. See Sao Mechanical dwg. topsoil specifications OS 't,' and curb Shown. Pitv"Ith Landscape plans Remove existing curb South Burlington, VT Install three bicycle Repfove existing loop. in 'p-oreto curb Landscape dnewing. I Sawcut existing NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 Revise layout, relocate special 5/29/18 Start new curb. Space, rovis. cover cal.. �Existing tree for am. ------------- ---- concrete sidewalk to existing concrete, So existing Pin new con We wout concrete aid ,rate J 6 Existing catch basin to remain -------- sid— cra� curb E-1 ting, agichalt to concrete Ll�ewalk. Replace base and resurface. New handicap ign:_,r— ----------------------- Now concrete curb handicap sfpace� ---------------- Existing flush curb to rormilin, CIVIL SITE PLAN ain. Repetir as needed, ----------------- ----------------- DRAwN BY PROJECT NO Klh=1530,1 3 ----------------- DATE 517,18 REVISED i, PERMIT DRAWINGS i a11HLIN(.l ()N was � ' o .. N/F Lo r_________� I � _ N/F Southland p- Enterprises, Inc. E U , , r r r ' 928.33' 80.00' 49.74'___________r___________i_______________i_________{ 1 i : � 1 ,f r F__________________ 1 ________________________ \N If (r 1 � I N/F KAPSHA IProperties, Inc. `\ Parcel L&M Parcel L&M B % '+ N/F Olde Orchard Realty Partnership, LP {' N/F Olde '� 1 ' Orchard Re ' _ _ Partnership,[- , Project Location -T sa°34'47"E r , 12E 513.]T_ — �S O4°47'44'W i N/F Jolle \ ,' �A :-.....-...1 ..... °,,...°,..__r.... - ....._ 46.09' Assaciates. LLC S4 1 ..... .-.N85 691.5"W.._ ',t !" N/F John 1�B175' R=270.00' L=88.60' Larkin, Inc.: t \ 1 (bldg only): E b�.l� Mixedq NE non-___ _i__.lNgs88.65' N/F Ferrell e a S 85°99'18"E p N/F Spillane 1 Parcel C L fs �. : �: Bali `•, N/F Larkin Milot Existing City of South Burlington utility easement �� \•, Partnership ti ------------------- ' 4 m 1g y N/F Northfield 0 ' y Savings Bank R=270.00' L=20$.94' R-15.00'L-9.61' `R-348.58 L=195.84'-...N.�S"19p�'Y:l.... i 21.21'S50°22'2TE wide right-of-way subject to irrevocable offer of dedication ;I i3e.9a' r --- N40'19'48°W 37.24' 1 Parcel 228.16' '-------------- N/F L&M Partnership N85°1901w "__________________ S41 °24'23"W 23.89 ROW 1. N/F g Parcel D Grandview Farms, Inc N/F Larkin 9 . 110792 st I W , f 2.54 acres l e F r, , z - _ . --------------- ' -------- - ------------------------------------------ -- Ikon 1. S85°12b97E — — _ — — S85°13'56"E 455.40' r � ' e SB5°13'S8"E 5.76' o SrF___________________ a o N/F Sisters and Z tar snelbvme 6a_ Brothers Investment ' ro n' nss snewvme Rd. N$ N/F John Larkin, Ina $1 `6' N/F John Larkin, Inc. r'n - 1 Group, LED dr\w. m (Parcel A) (Parcel f3) ��' 258 acres 4------------------- - _ 4.09 acres o � N/F Megni ,- N82°0329"W _ 711 26 — � '- '^ g Hddi 1 _ .� _ _ _ w LTD 8°2254'M' N6fi°22'54'w N6,°OS'59'W N/F Farrell Distributing Corporation 60,13' 175.25' 204.89' r m N/F 1233 Shelburne Road Association Zone line from City of South Burlington Official mapping o 3 e m;E r , E,E 'r E ------------------- 0° 100' 200' 400' 800' Bar Scde 1- 100' LOCUS Approved by resolution of the Development Review Board, The City of South Burlington, Vermont on day of , subject to the requirements of said conditions of said resolution. Signed this day of , by Chairman of Clerk City Clerk's Office Received 20 at Recorded in Slide on page _ of So. Burlington Land Records attest: City Clerk For Legend see Sheet SP-2 CIVIL ENGINEER Webs B Lansing Consulting Engineers,lr:c. I Mein Street, Suile 201 Colchester,? 375 L e T (802) 87&a518 F'. 1.b-a 8-I)818 mail®krebsentllensing.cam FOR PERMIT REVIEW O FIFTY SEVEN FAYETTE ROAD South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 Revise layout, relocate special 5/29/16 space, revise cover talcs CONTENT OVERALL SITE and P.U.D. PLAN 51F O C" DRAWN BY V rT PROJECT NO KL=1 O co DATE. REVISED. SCALE. 1'=4aaa SP-1 P,olen Phase PERMIT DRAWINGS / °I 's AA$$ 1�5 ♦j ♦ 1 \.'v Cr` ^'1`' n. CBO/-9B as' �: � -c�� _�'—____=Y-y___ _, -- :'wa'i ♦x x✓ •�` y .� Mv'ver �49(1z)`'' „ \a. '�. `a - -—^r,aa*.- � 9`'---;^: y er�a�`- \� 1 ` ;,, I`. p``i ��' _J i , N„ `.11JI• ,151.4.A r CSDI-619• \+�/m l�z el. .` #`\''.`' <`•.a+nr, •.a, 'v/ �.... �..,. lnvM JetBJ'(z0J \�>y In, /n llnnvv Mou1I8BaLeBJ4' ((1/2 r let) \ ♦/\"Y ` \. \ •CS 01-/Mn7z-J ' FM186. 40'r'IIB.('2B2z' \ �`�."� -•'k (74 • '?'^/'�-t '4/Nqt lB1.45:•/> !/<v✓ : „ - _�- > �`�•: CB p-B Rim /nv M 180.16' (24•)(N) Inv M 180.J6' (24 )(S) lnv our 180.46'(24) CB 0/ -28 � ,^ Rim 188..87' /nv M 18.142' (22��ff J /nv our 1814, 4 J LEGEND - 17 Survey Control Point 4 Existing Sign c} Existing Light Pole Existing Deciduous Tree Existing Evergreen Tree Existing Spot Grade Elevation .�� Existing Gas LineNalve --- - - - - -- - - 4Z-- Existing Sewer Line/Manhole - - - - - - 0-4 Existing Storm Line/Manhole/Basin gib Existing Exiisting Overhead Power/Power Pole - —+— - Existing Underground Power --- - - --- - - -9�14- Existing Water Line/Hydrant/Valve/Shutoff ---------- Approximate Property Line Finish Grade Spot Grade Elevation Q New sign ---------------------------------- - �' — -- -- — �. /---__T� r 4 \ - _ ----------------------- - _ L I - -- ro _. i . T �1 , , , All ------------ 7 ` r--- am Y ---- 1I r------------------------ Existing Commercial Building_ For building facade improvements CB DI-99 W see Architectural plans/elevations. --- RM, 20t59' _____ __ - ur `- - 197.09' (187 - - - /__ # Repalr/place existing metal_- _st6irs and concrete pad if ce a/-97 New sliding door entrance .._ _ /91.J5' needed. No base work. A New Special Vehicle area with sign / _ - I------T - JI j and _ d/ 4, `♦` r ~ 7 N r I rip -rep Pik --tif_1sLL----- -- --_ Is_LT__ RA • ' I M ifyi„I,.4 yL{•A - , d CB D/-21 / _II/ I , I 'x,ari`.J n's:.;r,i 64 , iy n� , I/ - ___' _______ �___�_.__ i `t:IJ „.t„ /�. i9�T'.L R/m 199.50• ' —>--New CB /I �r l ------ -- / / Mvki 196.65'(4• i -_-- / My our 195.70 (l�J Ir, , r _ Rdn 202.00' our 1 6' 74" ,..} - - -I--....-...-i-"i..--.-... - ` T T -i T T - 1—T - I L___ Ji___ L___. ' , I � _______;� I Planning and Zoning , , Area. 40.56 acres (P.U.D.) 4.15 acres (Parcel C) o-T_ I � I I , �' yr I i a Zoned: Commerciall -Residential 15 i I t ' - Commercial 1 -Automobile ao'ire � I ' ----- , t, < Project Description: Install new access ramp, create new tlrop-off area, replace brick sidewalk with I ----' -Z'B concrete, etld (fill in) existing building corner, add/replace bicycle rack and atltl one tree. Existing handicap ! ' J i 'S `� `♦ p R'` Coverage: Inv Lot spaces to be re -striped with new handicap access. g Existing Proposed u J --------' _________ _____,___ t1e ' I I tl o L&M P.U.D. Total Area 40.56 acres 143 535 sf fi. 143 1% 7% sf 9.1 % `: �-"`"' ;'j+1G\ `♦ p t1 --"-- -- i - C8',0/-1B ' �i`--------- Total lot coverage t�^564,219 at 131.9% �re563,563 sf 31.9% �a` ,,. • __X• k ri"=r-1 Rbn 81'- _ _ li I `. \ �• , , T ---- ---- ' , ---------- -real"C" Total Area: 4.15 some , , ' ♦ Y.,I li - L` Buildings 35,619 at 18.8% 35,969 at 19.9% nut l94.'r9 `per Total lot coverage 110,150 at 60.9% 109,466 sf 60.6% c y \ ._--_-J_�� I -_-__---- --�- O _ Front yard (Both Stream) Total Area: 29,466 s.f. Yf ` \ \ `� ' ' ♦ ; _ _ , CO IN-14 Qi Impacted: 5,836 s.f. 19.8% 5.636 s.f. 19.8% Rhn \ \ \ s{6-T-___ 1"i ♦,1 'fn'r£a pxY �___ lnv our 194 (24J - YiT �.r------------tl Repair existing hiindicap ramp \`` ; \ \ .a ♦"`l J_____=_uuU Ir 7r�tnnll,""`;,w _ I ` CBO/--75-i'_I tI \ \ \ l�`• / <v"4 J RNn J§S69' New railing on existing wood $idird �' r---'- In n 4 19'_ _ �p'', k� \. `: • `. \ c� \�. ` �� 4y -%`:'e - a 'i' u /nv b'186. y,.,ryr4if L8 a-J6 --� . ♦ °o , .` i e° ( - Rim /99.71 ;I �. ` • `♦ \ \ a , >, i' ` 4e44A v'-7�.�uL IB6. 19' (2,4 /nvM 19J7J'(74 J(NJ �`t I .` `. \ \ '90 ' '^�^�\' •ins' af�`_; l9J. Jl'(15 J(EJ ,'rl /nv out 193. 19' (24 ) s `•, ` ' 192JS4� M v M MI.63 (47 ' Mi, our/9Q0J'(24") ` --- r,-- _______- I 4t\ C8 0I-6 \ \ , 19I.S3' (4 J_-._.-, .. ........... r1189.24'(24�J(NJ �tcr .-_ +_ /nv out'W..J9'(24J \ _ --�________________ J \ \ ___ 19J.7. _��vmee GENERAL NOTES This plan is not a boundary survey. Boundary information shown was taken from a drawing entitled •Boundary Survey Lot D of L&M Park" by Krebs and Lansing, completed in September 9, 2017. Surface utility information shown is based on an existing features survey conducted by Krebs and Lansing. Underground utilities are approximate and not warranted to be exact or complete. Contractor shall contact New England Dig Safe prior to any excavations. The location of underground electrical lines which service the site lights are not shown on the Civil Plans. Other electrical lines may exist which are not shown on this plan. All Civil Site and Civil Utility design extends from beyond 5 ft. outside the buildings. Contractor shall see Architectural, Structural, and Mechanical Plans for all design within 5 ft of the building. Contractor responsible for all pavement markings shown or implied on the plans. P Pe 9 W The Contractor shall be responsible for all erosion prevention and sediment control measures necessary to comply with the Low Risk Construction General Permit and as outlined outlined in the Low Risk Site Handbook for Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control. The pavement and restoration shown may not include all restoration necessary to complete the utility work. The Contractor shall be responsible for repairing all pavement and subbase necessary, to complete the work. CIVIL ENGINEER Krebs 8 Lansing Consulting Engineers, Iz. 1E4 Mein Street, suite 201 cokhesmr, VT os— T: L e T (802) 878-0375 F. (802) 878-5618 malpkrebsantllanskg tom IAN o- _*-- NO 5703 r0 �INA,imPE��"sue FOR PERMIT REVIEW FIFTY SEVEN FAYETTE ROAD Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 Revise layout relocate special 5/29/18 space, revise cover talcs CONTENT CIVIL SITE PLAN DRAWN BY SUM PROJECT NO: KL=1533D.3 DATE 57118 REVISED. SCALE. 1'= 31' SP-2 0' 219' 40' Bo' 120' Project Phase PERMIT DRAWINGS Bar S.Alf I-= 20' ----- ----- -- —-—-- - --------------- p•----------------- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ---------- - l rfi�.Nrl.curb ----------------------- -1 184.60- I------------ ------------ 5Le.................. ......................... - ------------------------- ------------------------------- I ------------ h --------- ---- ------- . ........ ------------- ................... ------------- ------------ -------- ------------------------------------------- - ------- - ---------- ---------- Install structural concrete d. See pa detail on Stuotuml drawings Remove existing flush curb. Re lace with standard curb ---- -------- -'_____-tee________ -------- -- ---- ----- — ---------- —S ------------ ---------------- -- ------------ ---------------- -------- — ------- ----- ------- 'rx-okli S" hv,, - ------- /`✓�� �-_" I urea Tp, Ex Grove/ WetIcind New C13#4 i 2'x 2' structurei', Rim 188.72 (4" frame max.) L j S-Iisce 0/0, 18750 Inv Out 187.60 (2)8"PVC(SW) ------ 4 ft Deep Sump (see detail) ------ ------ ----- it L + 4. Ni + I Inv out 1 87'50 Cut top; of pipes to matchlslope 12- PIK E,. stann to S7MH I (M -------- Dotted lines represent --------- 0. 1 U Contours ---------- -------- - .1if ------------------ ----- ------ .......... E.. C812Ir 'i;nE vI T. z L 162.6J 5 In 182.61 W My Cut 1825J IN' ------------------ jug ----------- ----- ----------- xl"� P 81 new concrete curb - — — — — — — — — - ------------------ Remove existing 5'wide brick sidewalk. Resurface with concrete (no base work) ------- ----------- End new curb Dot hatch indicates shim pavement -------- ---- X/as needed (no "a work) Rim 2"' Re -paint lines ea, required CIVIL ENGINEER m & q C,mi,fting E,ti Inc. Colchester,VTOS,Pte T (802) 5780375 IF (802)878-N18 NO 5703 it o,z FOR PERMIT REVIEW O Dotted lines indicate proposed 0. IV contours and ramp "No Parking -Special Existing concrete/asphalt Vehicle Only sign to grass/landscaping. Relocate existing FD Slorz Remove base end fill with connection to new, outer well, New Stripes for �o Parking area FIFTY SEVEN appropriate soil. See Sea Mechanical dwgS FAYETTE ROAD topsoil specifications 2,0 -,tv, Remove eAs*(g concrete sJoNlI and curb adshown. Pavia with New tree. See asphaII detail. Landscape plans Remove existing curb South Burlington, VT Install three bicycle Repr(ove ..i.fing loops in existing concrete surface. Sea Landscape drawings SaI exist concrete sidew Sawcut existAg Z� concrete sidewati Pin new concrete --------------- sideweill, to exisfirb. Se—ut/start,—. new curb' New handicap sign Remove and dispose of concrete shim Existing entrance to Concientra to remain. Replace 'P"' I sliding door, See Architectural drawings, FFE a, door ;=t: a Oslo Heavier score lines Indicate expansion joints flyp.). See detail Enclose existing triangular plaza area. Convert to indoor space ... ... . Install flush curb Plncrete curb I NO. DESCRIPTION DATE S.—.t indirI concrete curb (1 2, 1 Revise layoutrelocate special 5/29/18 Start new curb. space revise vise cover c qq 4 It, 'to S.—ut existing cc.Pm1as1dew@k.*;;tiI concrete sidewalk to existing concrete` Existing catch burin to remain. 4, mz� 7 rl C8 01-17 End pew con curb fihn 202, 00' it 196 7'(18J Inv out 16'(24") CONTENT Usting asphalt to concrete S�. �iswalk. Replace base and ------------- NeI concretecur6 Re -stripe e)dsbnb handicap tipace� ----------------- I CIVIL SITE PLAN Existing flush curb to remain ZZZ Z: - ----------------- Existing concrete sidewell, to in. Repair as needed. ... ----------------- It---------------- I nee I- S, F.'u. Sit. PII DRAWN By SUJ ------------------ PROJECT NO IKIL- 15300 3 DATE 517118 REVISED SCALP I - = I a SP-3 1 10' 20' 4 1 60 1 P,.Pd Phase 1 PERMIT DRAWINGS P Scale I-= 10, ------- l SpL P-s'r NCCF LNFLIPNAPCYJ Lbm: Ady 19, 2017 ' Presen r: o k R,o ,, Kr , d• Lensing cmw/tkrg E gy ,o , /nc. I , - � /,' ,•' � � % i / / NLW1D - o /-d to deyfh Rrea ,doi r,do,impynic ruro, ' ��' ,• � / t NSWr -high wafer fable IP 11 /1' '; /! , i / _ w ♦ 0-16' Brown loamy send fopsod, moray roots Loox ro /riob/s, ,mre stmes / ' , f •� Z �; 16-72' o block of to c/o F dirin r r m 114, ,A- g/ _t. a d IS n Y c Rro nlnen =� rnrw,ghovr, so.n rs ro al- r ; NSWr assumed of 16,. NLWID r > ' left Nu _ �. - ,. , 0-10' 6'own loamy ,end tgowd, mmy roots boss rs rrbb/s, sm+e rfines anent, , , , 20-24' Q'errLrown aonry dmu ,ar to a k y 1— d,rbor yomnmr marten, , / I rnrovgnwr NSWr o,wme0 or ?D� NLWlB - „ , , , ,_ _ _ _ - CIVIL ENGINEER r, rr ' „ r, a ' ` '' '' '''.':` ,• ,:'' /;' ;% '1 _I wee,8 Lensing Comulaw Engineers, Inc. err ,r r, COI.1,a- , VT 05 T:(802)B]e-03]5 - .Y- �- ta` eilpkreB,andlansirg— f Area of offsite %'� - _ impervious in WS-3 �'J > and captured ,i i, „ o be c 0- NO -- -------------' .- , - > '• ". ,,;',',',',',','„'; /' i treateda �"P , d= _ 95 s.f. I' ; / I ---------------- --------------------- ' ' ' ' ' • '' , ' ' ,' ,'' `a�x / ��'��� FOR PERMIT REVIEW • i'r• ,' ,' ,, ", /'' ,�, � _'�-`�_ 41. ``♦ ' r ------------------ -- , 4t f • ''�c uct 'I Inv 87 8"P ;;' I 2 tr u Rim'1,88 72 ( ra �m�x.) Out,1 .60 (2)� VC(S��`.'�::`�'I 4 ft Deep,Surrp (see detail) D tted line re re t 0.1 d; coritoU '",•• __ _ a _east se�rBr:L FIFTY SEVEN ----- .---- FAYETTE ROAD Y • � / -'`{, - ',/ y,%, - - - _ 5' ♦'' South Burlington, VT - • ' / '' _ , '� Rim 1Aq. 72 zz 63 ME -Jr `♦�='�-___� � _ SQS` __- r,r __ 't_ ` L .� /nv /n 7H`d.6J S ♦ax`x\ -' '- �" .•'" '-':-" /. __ - - __ - -_ - __ eL_- __- -'c-`' t ;l l � �._ /nv/n 18263W , I 00 182,5j ,y N0. DESCRIPTION DATE '♦`j�`��l J ': �f ,,,'• `. / ,';% ; ```�: ,�?:,` , Redse layout reloca(especlal 5/29/18 space. remse Cover talcs „ 3♦ :-;, �, l; u t o i s tch slope '+'}'`= — —'s' / ` l 6 ` `♦ ,';.1` New SIA/N/2 M _ Rim 191.81 y /n 184.74 S Rim 186 CB/B2 JJ / / g, '\ a`o;; , My Out 184.84 N /n v /n 14-1'N v r� w / �. I i,_ _ ` i ^a"., In Out 18$JJ SW .'^ ♦'y,'' a"' G CONTENT WATERSHED a r ` r I r I J � � 1 ,� �• � SITE PLAN .__ - +,1 n — — x1 — .tl — — '' — — — —1 �r� fry �- — — — — — — — — - r — — — —sT— -* — �± '• ``'� ,•,1 .: �. n uwo.3 s r.r+ua v e.. - I's=-4�r= -'�-- ----'----- `tom-',y`-------'c-'-`a'' _-_accaa:: _r___________�_______S,__u DRAWN BY'. SUM ` ' `• � r n I r ' x x s1V' , �,' , I r r I , I I I I �...............s-a..,_...w................... �a._;.r .. /�.. I' x sir , PROJECT NO'. NL=15�0.3 r x � , r � i � , I I i r , , x 1 x r I I ,♦ x I , I i , = ,____ /_>` ,- , c _-_�_T _ I GATE' SP/18 ---- `>, ry , .. •, - ♦ r -- ------------------------- -- - �--------------- - - - -- - « �—/;; •`T�'�---a.,.ae_-...,.,:.a�-i,'--`=--==T�===--- REVISED: '--'-- , / ♦r ,---------------- ---`------------------a♦-`----L-- >_- r SCALE- 1' 1D ` x r ♦ ♦ ♦ �C __` k rE r ` . r _______________ ____________ _ r rII ___________________________________ _____________ ____________ WS-1 ' .57MHh Yt LJ I b __1- Rim 18Prolecl Phase 6.20 , 'I S 0' 10' 20' 40 607nr /n 184 w / V PERMIT DRAWINGS In J yP _IB7 HB N ' /n, But M..70 S I & — _ _ —,— LLt into existing 24' ou k# pipe '. _ — _ — — — --- Bar Scde 1' = 10• Cave and boot all cone ttoos. l t ;( I — — — —,— i — — — " , — — A// concrete used fn the constriction of concrete curb shall be our entrained and mode with Portland cement Are concrete show/ meet section 541 0! the State of varmout Standard Speallcotion for Class A concrete omit how 18 day compressive strength of 4, 000 psi. Provide 4- topsoil and seed Concrete Curb - Broom funfsh concrete - All pints to be tool finished - Exponskxi/contraction Ibmts awry, 10' with 1/2- pint fd/er. - Score J/J total depth of 10' mter 21s - Apply 2 coots of Euclid Ewrc/ea MY cure/sea/ compound to of/ concrete surfaces, per the manufocturen's specifications Joint filler shall be resilient non-exludng cellular fiber pint, uniformly saturated with asphalt, offering a minimum of 7OX recovery after compression. The Engineer shall be contacted of least 24 hours prior to forming concrete curb to review layout. The contractor shall sweep and apply emu/sized asphalt to base course pavement prior to laying top course. I 6" I 1/2'rodkis Concrete 6' Curb (typ.) bituminous concrete I .L4 �sN Subbase materials �•� shall be placed and ° compacted in 12" maximum lifts. The contractor to take sieve analysis of grove/ as soon it arrives on site. rrovel over grove/ with ony vehicle tracking soil prior to placement of pavement is prohibited /f grove/ is contaminated after placement, the Site Contractor shall be responsible removal of a// contaminated grove/ and paying for oil recommended sieve analysis as determined by the Engineer. 3" bit. cone. 1" Type 17 - top 2" Type IT - base -4-Lewing course (704.05, r-e) 20' Dense (coded Coshed Stone (704.06) A/temotive materials identified in Section 301 - Subbose ore not allowed -Mira% 5O0X, ar opprowd equal Owdop mi'hriun of 2. Loy Bat against subgrode. (no !olds or wrinkles) �Und/sturbed moterio/ or — Contractor shall shope / compacted fill (See Note 1J and roll subgrode to Rood Construction NolesJ reflect finish grade drainage Prior to Remow a// organics before installing�'roB 50OX. p/acing All or grove/ The Contractor shall prepare the subgrode in conformance with the design grades then, in the presence of the Engineer, shall proof roll the subgrode with a loaded tandem dump tuck. Conditions may require the removal of unsuitable material and placement of additional subbase. The Owner must opprow any work involved with the remove/ of unsuitable material and placement of oddtional subbase. With Concrete Curb Typical Road Cross Section Detail N. T S. Construction Notes 1. Are methods and materials of construction shall con/arm to the latest standards of the City of South Burlington and the State of Vermont Al/ wont shall be in conlornonce with aff permits and opprowfs issued far the protect, In case of conflict, the more stringent specification shall apply as diected by Engineer. All work shall be done in o workmanlike manner and completed in the time specified by Owner. 2 Are Controctor shall be responsible far all work and materials shown and required to make the yob complete. these drawings do not show every fitting or oppurtenonce. Alalenols shall be as specified on the drowfngs. Manufacturers product specifications shall be submitted far all materials to the Engineer for approval prior to instollotion. J. The location and size of existing underground utd7ies is not warranted to be exact or complete. Are Contractor shall field locate all utilities and shall contact the offected utility company, the Engineer and the City of South Bud'ngton prior to making any hook ups The Contractor shall be solely reVansble for a// existing utilities and their unintemipted services. All off -site backFd/, sheeting and sharing, dewotering, clearing and gibbing, erosion control, dust control traffic control, grading, and all incidentals shall be included as port of the required work. 4. Repair of a// disturbed areas, grading, sewing, mulching, repair of roods and curbs, powng, and other incidentals are included os part of the required work. All disturbed areas show/ be loomed and mulched until permanent ground cover is established 5 The Contractor shall verify a// harizonta/ contra/ and temporary bench marks before use. 6. The workers and public shall be protected by the Contractor from ony and ofl hazards connected with the construction w k. Open trenches, moteno/s, or equipment within the working limits are to be guarded by the use of adequate bomcodes or Boggers. A// bomcodes left Al position overnight are to be properly lighted Kerosene pots ore not acceptable. When worknorrows the usable pavement, Baggers shall be employed to aid the Bow of traffic so that there will be no undue delays. The Contractor shall be held responsible far the safety of al/ wkers and the genera/ public and o// damages to property occurring from or upon the work occasioned by negligence or shall be held responsible far the safety of oil workers and the genera/ public and all damages to property occurring from or upon the walk occasioned by negligence or day or night within the working area. A// work shall be in conformance to OSHA regulations, title 19. Parts 1926.651 and 1926.652, and oppficab/e to VOSHA regulations. 7 Contractor shall contact Dig Safe or other non-member utilities prior to any excavation. 8 A// new storm and sanitary extending from structures shall be laid with o pipe loser to elewtuon and slope as shown on the plans. 9. the Contractor shall sowcut all existing powment to be removed The Contractor shall minimize the pavement area disturbance. Contractor shall be responsible far af/ powment repair and restomlion necessary to complete the wk. 10 the Contrector shall be responsible for off constuctim layout. 11. Temporary silt fence shall be erected prior to any clearing or constuchan. Fencing may be erected in phases, but in no cose shall construction of clearing proceed fencing. Special areas may be designated by the Owner for preserwtuon of existing trees. These Drees shall be the Contractor's responsibih'ty to insure no damage is done to designated trees. 12 Existing plantings ore located run genera/ areas as shown m the plans Contractor shall protect plantings scheduled to remain so as not to damage these or their root systems. Surround any trees to be protected with o silt fence borner at the dip edge of the existing tree. 13 Contractor shall comply with all permits and opprow/s issued for this protect. 14. Contractor shall sign on as the Co-Permittee far the State of Vermont Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control permit far the project. 1.5 Slpe stability upon unsaturated soil conditions /f during construction saturated soils ore encountered, contact the Engineer immediately Epoxy coated dowels shall be used for Heovy Duty Concrete NEW Concrete Sde ilk, ar NEW Mu/I,-U Concrete Sdew 1k, or N£W Heovy Duty Concrete sidewalk (see Appmpfe Detail for Cm—te Design) PVC dowel s/eew (1/2) 6.6-616 galvanized WWF (sheets only) for New Heavy Duty Concrete only — NEW Concrete Sidewalk, or NEW Mdt_U Concrete Sdewok or NEW Heovy any concrete sidewalk (S Appropriate Detoe for Concrete Design) Control Joint. See Landscape Plans 7-J/4" x 1'-6" long smooth, /ialif/y greased steel dowels a 16' o. c. 9" embed depth. Center in concrete. Rein/ fig 2" Cleo (min.) if `S Concrete blocky l-/ntenupf support (per CS v rem mg O Mono/ of pints. Maintain Stir Pour slobs J' c/eoronce Procfice) (Tjp,J. separate days Formed erponskn )int. Use resffA%,t non-trudkg ce//u/or fiber pint, um%only Aimtieed fb asphat, oftmg a re lOX See opprprfote data. o y -It- c pressian, for subbase design. New Concrete Construction ✓oint/Control Joint Detail Contractor to use this pinning detod to .in NEW concrete to NEW concrete (walk to walk, walk to buedhg4 walk to retaining walls, stairs, etc). N.T. S PVC SDR 35 pipe shall not be Installed when the temperature drops below 31' F or goes above 100' F unless prior oppiorol is obtained from the Engineer. Extra core is required when handling PVC pipe during cold weather. PVC pipe shall not be stared outside and exposed to prolonged periods of sunlight as pipe discoloration and reduction /n pipe impact strength will occur. /f PVC pipe is to be stored on site lar 1 month or longer it shall be covered with canvas or other opaque materiel. Road Construction Notes (AB re,weaces to mod show ppwy to pokhg areas as »cur. ) 1. New road shoe be constructed to the /cue and grade shown on the drow/hgs The rood and utei'ty locations she// be as tyPfce//y detailed unless otherwise shown. 2. Al/ rood and parking consfmclion shall be ca a fed m accord ce with the Vermont Agency of Transportation Standad Specifications for Constucfion" 2011, hereafter ca/led ✓ mont H/gA y SpeciBrnfions, spec/ icatians / rid on these p/on; and pro,:xf specificelions. /n case o/ coneict the more stringent spx/n ollan shall pp/y as defennk)ed by the Engineer. .1 the Contractor shall follow ✓ ant Highway Specif otims (2011) S tion 20J11 for p/ockig end spreading embankments 4. Fe/ material for rood embankment shall meet Note /1J below end be opprowd by the Engines. f7/ show be p/oced in 12' lifts wetted ond compacted with sofisfacty coropoNfon equipment to 95X of maximum density (Stand d Proctor). 5 Rood in /e1 sections shall be placed and compacted a minimum of J feet above top o/ any utd/1y to be Installed before french is —.-led for pipe placement. /n benches and cut sections, the Contractor shall proWde all noes y sheeting, shoo fig and biockng to maintain co a'once with a// OSHA/l•TIS.HA regu/otions. 6. Methods far constucffon of subgrode shall conform to kenn ont Highway Specie frame (2011) 203.12 or ors determined by the Engines. 7 Any subgrade or subbase disturbed by Contractor, or rendered unsuitable by construction mochfnxy, shall be removal and replaced with opprowd gran/or bockrxl at the Cenfactor's expense. Be subgrode shall be compacted to attain at least 95X of the maximum d sity (Stendard Proctor) before placing rood or embankment molsols 8 the Owns will pay for on site sods testing (compaction, sie w, and proctor) . The Contracts she// pay for foiling tests. Be C tractor Is fully responsble for coordholk9 al!e testingspections Controctor shall provide minimum 24 hour notice to testing agency, prier to placement of my Item to be tested 9. Sand borrow ono' cush/on shoe can/ to ✓ ont Highway Specifiroffons (2011) 703. O.T. Granule borrow shall con/ m to the ✓ mont N'ghwoy Specizcations 70-104. 10 Crow/ subbase for powvnent shoe con/won to ✓ mont Highway W it 'Bons (2011) 70405 costa. Substitute mate io/s AAntiried in VAOT Specifications 5 tin JOl - Subbase ore not allowed. 11. LewBrig course shill conform+ to Vermont Highway Specifications (2011) 704.0.E line grading. Aou/d shall con/ to Section 704.12, Aggregate far' Should s 12 B7umknns concrete pe—ent show conI to vennont N'ghwoy SpeciSroli ns (2011) Section 404 and 406. Binds course shall be Type / t Al anal fdgsh wilting course shoe be Type ///, IV, ores delaeed 13 Embonkment 10e far oN knpr ions seas, EXCLUDING BUILDINGS slid/ be a stew specie alias as fo//owr S' w X Fner 4e t00 2' 85-100 /4 60-100 /200 JO maximum 14 Dense graded crushed stone, cushed growl and sond borrow show not be contaminated by work. Consluclfon trail shall not trawl a— .posed seas of this matefal 15 Contracts is responsble for aff powment morkxrgs (ie. parking sbping, handkp mkngs stp bor; etc) shoen or /mpwfed en the Peons. - Point for powment mkings shall be Hydrphost ebferbame hofzc Point by Frmk/irn Point C pony' /t shall be re6ectfw, WC compefont lost dying, 100X a Ac waterborne tropic pot t. Pool for stop born crosswoks end wine strokg shall be white. Conan pant color with awns prior to pphLvtbn. - Imfric point shall be wed with a uniform thickness and at o rote such that no pavement is wsb/e offs sy rig. Adoitiono/ pakit ppekotion wile be requked i/ unoerey rig pavement fs visb/e. Al/ concrete used fn the constriction of concrete sidewalk shall be air entrained and mode with Portland cement. fie concrete shall meet section 541 of the State of Vermont Standard Specification /or Construction for Class A concrete and hoe 28 day compressive strength of 4, 000 psi. Joint filler shall be resilient non -extruding cellular fiber pint, uniformly saturated with asphalt, ollerfng a 6' As shown on plans 6' ' -- of 7OX recovery 6' thkk pass A 4000 after compression. psi concrole. 6" wide grovel shoulder 4tpsoil, see Bile oaw rwrw rW. plan for gm., ML500, 12' Coshed growl subbase Undisturbed earth or approved (704.0$ fine). All material c—pocted to 95X standard proctor in 12" hilts. Concrete Notes - Broom finish concrete Construction pints shall be spoced max. 24' in all directions. See Concrete Construction ✓alit DetaA - Score control pints 1-112' depth of inlerwls equal to width of sidewalk Contractor us responsible far providing appropriately sized tooling trowel. - Apply 2 coots of Harris Emulsion Kurseel JO91 cure/seal compound to a// concrete surfaces, per the manufacturer's specificolions. Concrete construction and curing shall conform to section 618.0J of the current VAOT Standord Specifications far Construction New Concrete Sidewalk Detail (For Concrete Walks Eft. Wide or Less) N. T. S. 1/2" Radius slope = Sea sit. plan 111111 Non -shrink grout around cost man home '1 V: Mastic, b" ring r or butyl rope. •o Monolithic base - First pint shall / / �- be highs than i Vert out elevation. / wrier ' / Undisturbed motedol Catch basin from. and grate shall be 4" high Neenah R-J588 home and R-3405-A Type H grate, or equal. Three (3) flange homes shall be used against curbs base —New Concrete Curb 8' PVC 5DR35 Extend concrete fran curb ound and below storm pipe. Concrete encase entire penetration. See Structure Penetration Detod Catch bosun by Comp, S.D. he/ond, or equal - ASTM spec C478 4, 000 PSw concrete - Steer reinforced to AS7M Specs. AASH7O H-20 wheat two ' to 1 1/2' crushed stone CB �J4 — Deec Sumo Catch Basin N TS. Temporarily farm interior of structure. Exterior side walk of concrete storm stmCt re awl or mortar is not on acceptable aubstifuls far concrete. 12, min. Place 12' wide and thick Red -Mar concrete donut" surrounding pupa penetration of exterior wo// of storm structure CIVIL ENGINEER Krebs 8 tansinp Stn Erip Erpirwen:, Inc. 184 1, n ts, V Stile 201 Colchester 7 0S5 L T (W2) 87&%18 il@krebsantllaneinp.com FOR PERMIT REVIEW FIFTY SEVEN FAYETTE ROAD South Burlington. VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 ARV SB submit set 5/2.118 CONTENT CIVIL DETAILS DRAWN BY: 5lM PROJECT NO. KL=15300.3 DATE. 517/18 REVISED CD-1 Structure Penetration Detail 1-l",N,a" N. T.S PERMIT DRAWINGS As Ndid Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Notes 1. Controolw hoo be responsible /or colp/wlg with o// Slot, old Loch erosion prey Pa, old sediment control stondoids old permit r,qukoments Wring cons/uct/on. 2 the /Knit or disturbonce she// be Newly defined by Cmtioctor's sus �" pnk to Nearing. E sion old sediment control .1,W s rho// be estobhMed to trap sediment ol site. J. A# e n cd,bW shod be placed os shown on the dowmgs w os orb ed by the Engwl Rra C-1-to, Noll moo toin the Im cmtro/ measures unto the Engnee, is sot4rred that peimonent ywnd row, is astoboshM old thot rurthe, measures ore not required of ho/ be the mspons@dty of the Contractor to e,np/oy oppropriote eras control own os shon these dawdrgs old any other meouns os notes y to troy sedhnent m vie. A All woos of dolurbonce sholl be peimooenay orto p only stobA oil' with wo control mottng os as posses old within 48 hours of fi o/ grodmg. Al/ oeos of disturbance shel be of /east hento orooy siob#ued within/4 doss of initial disturbonre. Any dfsturbonce ofle, 74 live days of exposed sod shot/ be stobaixd doily u,/ess the /ol..g ex Wlims op/xy c is Stabdirotion is not r iiihed if a-thivov is to condd,ue m the area Al the nest 24 hours did Mere is no precpflotion /arecost Al the newt 24 hours 2 stobdizotmn is not rea✓ked i/ the work is occurring m o sNFcrontoesed erco»tim (:e. no ounet) with o depth of 2 fe.. o greater (e. g. house hvndot/on covetlon, utdity trenches). StobA,otion meosvres sho// hc/uo, mulch old netting, e,osron control motMg, -shed stone, prowl, w Powment. 5 Refer to the Low Risk Ste Nondbook for Erosion R wntm, old Sediment Contra for oeeeptob/e methods of stobd/ otion. 6. fie coptroctw shod use wore, for dust cwntrd 7 fie Controolo slid/ _ode inlet protectkn wound oho catch barns (sx N g w new) thot cuo/ect cmasi u tim site slo mute, runoff bushed store mhet protection may be used n non-po✓ed 8. A stobdied consluctkn wtra,ce (Se, 0elod) shd/ be Insld/ed old montoh,ed of of onsbuclion o ss lorolions Coitrxto, shoo be rcsponwboe for hl toilk g crashed stone to _dole stob/e oeos for' construction ✓hide fro/6c stogkig, old stooge. the Controcto is mrponsb/e /n i oddng old mok,tdhlkg sufFcient stone to a,,-t unng old sediment (nicking. 9. All paved roods used by ccnstuctwn »hides ho/ be swept doily Wong pwiods of active Cons(uctron, w of o greote, fie-CAvif drl or gm»9 is tracked bon Me 0. fie swept ebrfs shoo be ion of ever removed hen the curb race if rvep/knboe. 10. A/l temp—, wosion old sednront control measures slid/ be removed within J0 Wys prior verso slobdiofkn o ofte, Me measures ore no longer needed, unless othwwfse outhonmd, 11 All sedknent removed Iran sediment cmtrd prochces shoo be plocad in on approved sill dfsposo me 12 All tyros that do not hove estoboshed wegetotfon by 0ctobw 15th must be slob#/zed di occot-ce with the ftle, Copstuction Reglikomelts listed on this hest. IJ Afte, re, t seeding the Coll rocto, hd/ be rewonsb/e for wotim g, if neressoy, to em-, odequole w9etot/ve growth. 14, wore, from dewateifng o,tiW14, that Rows off site must be clew. voter must not be pumped into storms seve, /okes or wet/Dods ✓n/ess the vote, is chew 15 fie Cmtroctor shah be responsible /w old msowlim old mointmonce of the era uo, preventhon old sodFnenl control p-ctfces for the Project. Inspect/ ens ono cone oopdnq reports shah be per! ed of o mdprnum once o reek old one, every piecpitotion :went thot reruns in a dischorge hom the site. fie pwfinete, of the site old do BMPs wd'/ be inspected of the veld of each w do, to wsure thot sediment wolf not lea» the sire. If swim t nos (ravened b �d the site boundwx fit slid/ be swept up or oMerwfse removed old Wposited on -site fin on v,9i-t woo of the Md of soon w dbW, Existing pavement ground -� 8. or roadway m0 Miro/i 50OX fabric Provide opprprfafe Profile transit,- between Stabihied Construction Entrance and roadway 40' Existing 4 1p'mfii. 4' m nus ground 1' crushed stone (149101' 7a4 17). D' min. rod Plan Note. - Contractor shall be responsible for the installation, maintenance, and removal or a stabilized construction entrance of each construction entrance for the protect. The Construction Stabilized Entrance and Its continued maintenance shall be o minimum measure to prevent frocking of sediment off -site. - Contractor to use Mrofi 500x under stone for temporary construction roods - stabilized construction entrances shot/ be rpoired when sediment is tracked off site. Repair shall include adding addition/ 4' minus crushed stone and/or removal of contaminated stone. THIS DETAIL TO BE USED FOR ALL TEMPORARY STONE 5TA8ILIZA TION AREAS IDEN77FIED ON THE PLANS Temporary Stabilized Construction Entrance & Staging Areas N. r.5 Construction Limit Barriers - l pwwy harp-Ikked construction fence shoo be used to ".00te cwsludfm -its W,we praclico/ w ,vhwe dkecled n the Colhoct Document:. - o -w constuctkn Ience o . tents shah be used M dell —A, shwr-term consruclion -till- os well os wound Me dip line otinny ex! Ling trees to rcmom. - J' thkk orange pa,,V'r mesh eebbng -or otso be used to --te constuction /knfrs colrilhn 50 / t of ony :tram, late, pond or waond F this p uect, pdyeslw mesh eebbing shd/ not be used m oleos that ore proxenote to pedeshiun or wchiwdor tmf&.. Straw waffles may be used as as substitute for sift fence for areas opproved by the Engineer. NO IF. Contractor shall be responsible for the fnslol/ation, maintenance, Old remove/ of sift fence fin all locations shown on the plans. 1. Mointenonce shall be performed as needed and mbterfol moved when sediment reacher half of fabric height. Remove Wood stokes driven on silt fence dflor successful establishment of vegetation. down slope side of fence Mvoli fool 6/ter fabric Stople fabric to wood stoke A Form 6' (min.) deep t ench lay fobrfc in Aff clam cover with -site moterkI. flor // silt fence fs II I I I �lnsto/led when ground `� L� s frozen, a grave/ or sand ballast must be used. A Mfrofr' 100x filter fabric attached to stakes on ups/pe side. T_vpico/ Temporary Si/t Fence N. T.S North American Green 575BN Material Content Straw 100X (50 ibs/sq.yd.) (27 k9/m2) Netting Leno woven, 100X biodegradable *to fiber Weight approximately 1.64 !bs/1000 sl thread Biodegradable Installed as per manufacturer's specifications. Slope 1 Silt fence spacing chart Sipe silt fence spacing 5X to IOX 50 ft. or less IOX to 2OX 25 ftor less > 209 15 ftor less Material Specifications Erosion control blanket shall be a machine -produced mot of IOOX agricultural straw. the blanket shaft be of consistent thickness with the strow evenly distributed over the entire ores of the mat The blanket shaft be covered on the top side with natural Tiber netting having on approximate 1/2` X 1/2' mesh and be sewn together with biodegradable thread Straw erosion control blanket shaft be 575BN as manufactured by North American Green, Inc. (812-867-66J2) or equivalent. Erosion control blanket shaft hove the following properties - Erosion Control Matting ALTERNA7F. Secure "harsh Mot' or opproved equal, coin in/et filter over catch basin. aottom o, depression should be 2 ft. min. fiom edge of Inlet Protection catch basin rim. (Povement Areas) She/low depression wound grate In/et grote ryyicd ill fin/ef grates /nstol/ `.ltorsh Mot Ccushed stone, r approved equo% c ,noel ✓AOr 704.17 voter over a// catch bd m proles Mamlofn she/low depreaslon Plan ound grole un17 p-ing and/or f al sfobdiofion / 'h ol/Zo w der ..soon has occurred. /noel grate / d gate rz' Ccnished stone, VAOr 704.17 Bottom of depression should be 2 ft. irm. Catch Basin from edge of catch basin rim. See site plan / size of no rap inlet protection. Catch Basin Intel Protection CONSTRUCT/ON STAKEOUT NOTES The Contractor shot/ be responsible for all construction stakeout for the protect. the Engineer shall provide the Contractor on AutoCAD R2010 dewing of the site design. Ilse droving will include honionto/ and vertical survey control. Add7fonol survey control will be the responsibility of the Contractor 1, fie Contractor rho// be reponsb/e /a using proper survey equipment and having properly trained personnel to use this information. Any Contractor that does not hove proper equipment or personnel shall subcontract the work to 0 competent consultant. 2. The horizontal control datum may be based on a coordinate system that is unique far this project. Project north may not refer to astronomic or magnetic north. J Me Contractor shall check the integrity of survey control points by occupying a control point checking distance to back sight and checking distance and angle to another control point prior to any construction stakeout. fie contractor shall not proceed with stakeout if either measured distances or angles do not match calculated values. 4. Graphical images of inbostracture b the AutOCAD drawing may not be in on accurate rpresentotfon of its size. It is the Contractors responsibility to vwofy size and Shope of a// items to be stoked out. 5 After completion of radio/ stakeout with the survey transit, the Contractor shalt check web stakeout point as necessary to verify the horizontal and vertfca/ position of the point and that it is correct in relationship to the rest of the pro/sc1. 6 fie Contractor shall complete all construction stakeout to on accuracy of 0.1 feet (excluding budoing stakeout, which shall require a finer accuracy). Soil and Seeding Notes I. topsoil shalt hoes a mklimum 4' depth unless additional dpth is specified on the Civil or Landscape plans rpeoil shall be natural, /ertiM,, triable soil representative of local productive sod and free of cloy lumps, stones subsoil or other foreign matter forger than 1/2 inch diomeler, not Irozen or muddy, Acidly pH shall range train 5.5 to 7 and shall contain 4X organic material as a minimum. 2 fie Contractor shall hove a soil analysis performed on the tpsod (UVM soil testing lob 656-JOJO). A// testing costs will be paid by Contractor fie results of soil analysts shall be provided to the Engineer for approve/ Me soft onalusfs must slate: o. Percentoges of organic matter, inorganic matter (slit, cloy, and sand), deleterious materials, and pH levels. b. Sew analysis and mineral old plant nutrient content of tpsod. c. rest for herbicide contamination and provide sport certifying that no herbicides ore present. d State quantities of nitrogen, phosphorous, and potash nutrients and any firestone, aluminum sulfate, or other sod amendments to be added to produce satisfactory tpsoll. e. roused shall meet the following grodotion: Sew Sizes., Percntooe Possina: Inch 10ox 1/2 inch 95-100X No. 4 75-I00X No. 10 60-100X No. 200 10-60X J Commercial fertilizer shall be a complete plant food conloinfng nitrogen (50X organic) phosphoric acid and potash. Soil tests will indicate composition required 4. Hydro seeding and tocirrer is the rewffvd practice for turf establishment. Specifications ore: F,rtdfzer, 19-19-19 75 lbs per /,000 gallons of water Lime: 100 lbs. per 1,000 god-s of water Seed, 6 lbs per 1,000 square feet. 71. 46X Ma. Future J000 Per Rye Cross Germ: 9OX 14.81X Ma. Dynasty roll Fescue Germ: 90X 9.74X Mn. Creping Red Fescue Germ: 90X 2 J2X Mox. Crop 1.61X Mox. Inert 0.06X Max. Weed Mulch: JOO lbs. per 1,000 gallons of water rotifer 5 lbs. per 1,000 gallons of wafer. Monufacturer'w log shall be given to Engineer for approval 5 Areas having still compaction as a result of construction slid/ be rota-Mled Prior to placing topsoil ond/or seeding. 6. // hand seeding, only straw mulch is to be used and secured by netting either organic or inorganic. /f inorganic is used, it must be removed before the first mowing. 7 Starter fertilizer shall be applied at the manufacturer's suggested role at the time of seeding. Fertilizer application will not be allowed in sensitive areas and odrbcent to drafnoge wogs os determined by the Engineer. 8 Wolering is to be done by the Contractor and is to lost for the duration of the warranty period to maintain proper growth. Water and al/ apparatus necessary to apply the water must be flmished by the Contractor (:ehoses sprinkles etc). 9 Stoking of all tpsuded areas to control foot traffic will be required. Unless otherwise specified, acceptable stoking materials will be grade stokes and twine or string with flogging attached for visibd'ty 10 A guarantee of gross establishment through the first mowing is required. Any sparse or bore areas larger than I sq. ft. ore to be redone. Weeds, crab gross, dandelions, clover, and other non -gross species ore not acceptable far gross establishment and shall be repaired. 11. The Contractor is responsible for the fist mowing. After the first mowing and prior to the Owner taking responsibility for the lon areas the Owner or on Owner's rerresentotim and the Contractor shall meet to inspect the vegetation establishment 12 Contractor is responsible for o// lopeall to complete the protect os shown. /f existing volume of tpsod is fnodequote, the Contractor shall purchase ofhite approved tpsod oe necessary Winter Construction Requirements (October 15th - Aoril 15th 1. For areas to be stabbzed with vegetative cover, seeding shall be completed no /tiler than Sptember l5th to ensure adequate growth and cover 2 /f seeding is not completed by September 15th, additional non -vegetative protection must be used to stabbze the site for the winter period this includes the use of Erosion Control Molting or netting of a heavy mulch layer. J More mulch is used for temporary stabilization it must be applied at double the standard rote, or a minimum of J inches with on 8OX-90X cover. 4. Stabilized Construction Entrances shall be enlarged to provide for snow stockpiling. 5. Limits of disturbance shall be moved or replaced to reflect any revised boundaries of winter work. 6 The site shall be managed to provide adequate snow storage and control of meltwater Cleared snow shall be stared down slope of all oreas of disturbance old out o/ slormwoter treatment structures. 7 A minimum 25 foot buffer shall be mofntoined loth perimeter controls such as silt /once. 8. Drainage structures must be kept pen and free of snow and ice dams. 9 Silt fence and other practices requfriilg earth disturbance must be installed ahead of Hazen ground 10 ro ensure cover of disturbed sod in advance of o melt event, areas of disturbed sod must be stabilized of the end of each wok doy, with the following exceptions.' - // no precipitation within 24 hours is forecast and wok will resume in the some disturbed oven with/, 24 hour doily stobbzotion is not necessary - Disturbed areas that collect and reta#7 runoff, such as house foundation or open utility trenches. 11. io for to stabilization, snow or ice must be removwd to less than 1 inch thickness. 12 Use stone to stabilize oreos such as the perimeter of buildings under construction or here construction vehicle traffic is anticipated. Slone paths should be 10-20 feet wide to accommodate vehicular tro/fic. CIVIL ENGINEER Krebs 8 Lansing Consuhing Engineers, Inc. 184 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchecla. VT OSCdB L e T: 1802) 818-0 5 F: (W2) Bl&%18 mail�bebeandlensingtom `NIwIOE//nnr ctiP" #yam NO 5703 *_ FOR PERMIT REVIEW FIFTY SEVEN FAYETTE ROAD South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 Revise SB submit set 5/29/18 CIVIL DETAILS 57 renrte Detd,A g DRAWN By SLM PROJECT NO KL=1530D3 DATE. 517118 REVISED SCAlf. As Noted XMIA PERMIT DRAWINGS The Low Risk Site Handbook for Erosion Prevew loll and Sediment Co Uol Ie` LT August 2006 3. Stablllre Donetruatlon Entrance, PuNow. sense annrv<tpn entrance he Ph,m mm h«n venom h.. b P..h, "..k ng onto #revs Renwrw.arrti If will a eq wnicb baMc nH atne How b Ihroag r aeMae,. wn 1 ` A-e.rm H.r. ids rentl• o Hpwa.pN.emm Le+bpn:2:lornmer- Coma. 11. berm wRM1 a ehonl or wMmoving 2 Smd enC mu cn berm or cowrwM ems on aMNl n nglmmetlmte Y .ter m ! 5mbyxe lM gvw cnenn+whn ewtl end eve. mubh orerwlon conval men ng Lm Ne cnenne wM4 masnertnen 20%• a Eneun Eh b t annneb eon o.M sorb zb wXn p. Enwmm� tnemm�o we, onnNs star 6. Th. diversion berm Snell remeln In pleas until the dhbraa ereea are Damp m.ryH z.e. 'gee page 39ro s a 8. Stabll" Exposed Soil Purpow: seMieve mubh1q. appNing snap. wntrol y _1' III M1ytlroeeedrell, all metnatleto nabll.e wrtew wh1I. mob Draect Ne wn grew ie eaeaNM1ing RugUlroments. Al erme a tlMueanee must newmmpor+ry or aHmenent 10111 nT 14, or 21 Eqs. noel 1eP .1eutnorxetbn. A- ": aq tl ebrbanw n the arcs must be sorb bed H IM antl or each wont The, tlaY foe 'eam.bw appy •St'N Izn on leratrwured it m.h nd atocontinue • se2unauw o.arebn+o e=art 2wknowmIn I....oH nbor g-., I.., houw fouMetlon Hmveticn, uup tnncneel. agi M) How to nwnply: gUng Ne elu or eeaione of me elmto don y+m e. amDThn wariell frQaN..wefo bnal d d , tan 1 n.eaureaentl w1 11 Me N..d,..,- wing end mulching rerea lollpw the weoMmtona antler Rue eS ab ing Ewowtl So' �M w awn awn gnaw mwa.w mow n.w 34 Table of Contents s etron I Introapnion Whit Ice wmbn presrendon tint aetllmeM embol7 1 D.Irand tip 10...........................2 Ahp1horm %pare ........................... 2 Se ., 2: The RepwHnazb 1. Mark S. 6owuar....................... 3 2. Limn Diaturbanm A.. ................. - 5 ......................5 3. Smbllize Corefruction Een.................. T 4 ImmlSlh Fe .... .. . .... 11 5 Dv r Udand Ronal . ............... 15 e. Slow Down Cnen n. Ru. ..... i. 7 Corutrudt Permanent COMr.. ..... 23 e 3 b''.e Ca v. 5 n . .. 25 9 WI Sm.il tl .. ..29 10 S Iruz Spn 1 G d ................. 33 11 -a hl . . ... ..35 12 1n .-,Site. .. .. ..... 31 SecNen 3. Anaitbnal Fewura!s How to mlcrgae saps ........................ 39 How to ubrhate Ha ......................... 39 The Low RIDk SM Handbook for ErrWon Prarentlon and Sedlmom C,M 1 ornlb'D 11. e.1. tl°mbpuimbnt 11m1a1..11 e Vermom nna wrmrt Mu ormwau�e�eon,rg.a rruolm �aanrwtlon ama. cwnam<wn ceanl rormd 3so2o µtaw an ne lbtemml flak utility from the anavwticn a ty end amgorieame appliant'a ectiviry tie .Risk. am Ruk ar thn-.1, repmres en Inmvltluel ormh Pe ins.antlarde rn Nie -1, wrw ea the rwuiretl Eroaan Prevention antl 5e III 1-rp Pan or w e.term netlb be Law Pali fuMar 2P 020na Cantaa ldormepon V nerm0uaty0mUon SO Swtla �g1O NorN 70 w�w.vcweremuaoN.«Tymoramwnn.mm Ino b 1 Rock 5lxa mW 4Mc. ebne �Hn a nm,v m imam aratn aom (« en m � mum gn m anvewM, a anoner; M Gadsable: %ace flltarcmn under entrepavel Eetl ME a hue 'nd to leap tl f m "ng 1 ow b 1.r1arI en ben all ror-he by We 11he by 3 be III_asoil a nd nmwi h, I.. rocks or debrl. HaeN aMmMaaapary HWlbaM s.�W I.e i�ire�iaa p/ec�nxal.2nar lee/wrel _. ._._ la '_n neelw nrxewNro _ en•uns+++nm enwmw+noxemmeu -tom eau �"Ta aaleaaa� .aw•. w n e. v swm.,e n w.m.r-...... 5-RMarsmw.1 11 11.2 mlNwoo a.rl - m.21n. p12<mNJ3W.et1 Mre9M1 � pew ren.nu ectu,ere inwuarlam ym �.d��mnenew m Hmapwwrc29a n 12. De11t1,I.9AWWtlas P Treat water Dumceo npm aewe 'hgenNNbe..h., n is clear wean mwlnA [Fe wnnrualon ette. Fequimnentn g eR vn eetMtllowrenft. Ne oo° - apl..r wmrmps naa re arm. ar wemnea amewma w+Wr°e I nw ocmn0:t Uaingw<k mere ar wd.rn- er begs cn amn rhh.noses . plea dwM1 d wemr wapavree'nnlNvegtama a n drew ewN fmm-1-erenaya Pemow wcumu area ae.ment Ry..���AeHw.ww.!..+Ha.Mnwa+rea+se.. _......_.-.. V I Dewnerrnganlwbea36 ....I Introduction attar is cos+mr prevnrtion and vmkmmr cann,n Sediment waeM1ing into meemc a pw a tM leraart .1 problemsin Vermont. 6edimem ten killo M1er organisms tine atlmrs.y iman iwc habit.. a' a. on moat wmbpnkn ones. wgnan in%aw naprmecbnh<mer�ivafpcoof remrnretl. Iwvrng large area a ail b Ne elehurrte. During ainlall orerawmen. Homed sal may be eeaiy notletl tine trensporba earq cvwma, lekea, or wetbnds. to To Prevem tnk Dom UPWIhg sm� npm a erM mote n tom I on an me must Ee ueetl. ' 11 I1�n� kDi. w .rHewwwW4e.Paapnw.a vw�akrHw�H M�wrW�n_ er. ua.rn mewme mduzc corstmcwn Eor se,.. 10 6. Slow Down Charms llzed Runoff d.bq m1.9a th. WhT.11w nc°.e�.g0 R"A H.xnts. Irm.re .. anamnr.a n«w ma'n e a tm « mermen m.brmw.mr on raunha In.n rop mu# ..pea emn.<k acme. HH else ma.t notaamd N Imrag: H+I/x: No groeter Nan 21en. Cemer ofdem enoulC a .ones, 2:1 .the aMeemton 1 armt .12 p.39 ror s ope w cu etlam Stom eke Usea dn.1of2m91nI . w.n Dam..noae awn N. wiaN m Nem.nnw em SDHtne .5pecetirwe acmewN#toe botmm;., m.the aWp.teemdam ..t el«.tonamem te he gbt ofa mmtiea grasp m.°°cn«km v dryeaoD.. smdng rn row• S"boa pr e.m-a n charms (Ift) Maine--hTam a«pm<.rea mhlhd m. a.m 19 eepasnlan re, eveWpmwron WrrrxXenamMam mwrenne erxee wnawm 12. Impect Your Site Pwtxa pram• map .will her ms{ulerr° Iremaom anemrorenw�ter .utility. p newn�H�n .gym D na°stma°8i m«ac rip b n a a wn.rge� n ng eaonngmme epwnlbacbm aN ne0 n N a rmwrpw ales ln�pasawErem Y a37 Dory m mar we, oa m wewmrxm ro wmwa.wam.eeenonaw Dot tlaperms" Anyaretrunions.,,rd I.I.m 1ormoreacres will Ierger aewbpment plan the n .1 w monecnaa, requim a V+vnont stars mrmh lorntwmwater mwnergw Irom cpmlruaion time ApPlI H Pmcase 1. wtndergory.Nepr' posed Prgea°ins mMNe guN • uality.org/rtamwn r. m. umlNallbrm, .punt.{Ne P. o�epertmmSa yw�memblmPn conwu.la. suomh the NDlln OECarlewl fio rOYa baare sou plan m be$n constrverbn ronbw eumclenr timeW sang upon rcwpt.wrmen a.n« zetbn hom oEe, you ere u rm a wdn mmbu.kn. xtlmmtcmvo nnrauon a.m. °zan0 your she svetd Medmrax Rek Nen yoummt MWnamR sNvin'N «Noseanal. go2D tar p.rmn. ns+n bewdaal 4. Install Slit Fen.e rpose Sh rm<ec'nmrapt runofr eve el ow auwanaetl xd mentor cenleout neroaaHtw,b: b" on mac nnl aaeame<omv e ,vvh'Iw anYdHh swaleta Irmt wwemn e smm andcene a'aprb.a wnx edegrecwwdhn ws sue cmwr c npm form wgnnng° B InIp, e tlem. rabnoa bat ncM1eck tleme,a 9. Winter Stablllu8on vrprat•: Meneging mnrtrunion Mu+N minimize noaion Nnvenl eetllmem loedmg.-1. 1. a Year-round nge. In wlmont. N. cnellenp becomes ere. tins.. during the lam tall, winmr, and eerh spring onme. 11. 11 Winter wnnru.icn'mbwc 35 D perApr 15,'11. aaibw bd between Mber end Apwhen n end eadlmem comro aegnbc-Ily rougnoatM tins g meX end rune <an°pnduce s gnMmnh Kowa war 1 eM Meturemtl gnund geatly --go. pmente lar emebn Weprrirmr®HS IaritieXn SnnVlarn. Eor mma pmiena Nn win <pmpbte mon tllrturbemw said.. pnorN Ne winmr peao010cbber IS). [M1e lollowing rwuirementa must a adhered ro: I.F etl q�egne.on, meting snail Hemher 16 m ensure eeaquem gmMh antl cwar. walna ie oat ampleted dy se.emHr is. caanrpna npnw.g rom. prpro_ hh.. ua Sean... The Requlrementa 1. Mark Site Boundaries Purpose. Mark the sib boundariesto identity h.IP 1. tsa n. Dnlraahnaroar Sim wiu nelpmlimntbe ma m nrturbanro. preserve Hirting wgetetion antl mh.rmlm ammiel an me anti. Fequlrements. Ypu mlrsfp[ pgeimlM merktne lim'Iu awr-msrunion. • Ys � T" b y ✓ b Ps�.4 ir�p NN 4.ad, B vea ` 1 NNn. m pldpe e Spann ed101wt rdovmM1 hvm mm meoa�s°nave ab el Dare wl. dr n.g. wev. wrefa�ioo feHauh a nmrr<. a<rmaN. awm mot pp ens awn req d aammM. pn longn/.to bn.k olal sih tonb�°18ertmm cnenneb ar h. J-1.en°.6ohm deep tM°om ong Netreh.hncn • Enwre+tekm+e on Ne dawn. sde of tneleae Jh. 1.rd n{Neenaarekm NgeNer Dr werokae n.ge I I.-m la°bld, .bean k anpm • shin wMnmsetts .-It I, M' and xtllmant DH«e't N neXwey w im erxx a trencnatl n .pant OMtlMIe spa° 2 __ w nanm rod. IN. IndudH w. Emy«nnCc'ntnl Mattlreng h'..'he.. May h Irv, Swtling wttn winmr rye ie rwomme 'hI— a. eaY phhhh, ion during wHa ha 3. When mulch b epecMM, appN nyhly 21nmm an a0e0%war. Mukn eM1ouM betrwketl in embillzH wttM1 netting In open °rom vulnannb m aw i rr :3 n. .e rs.r 39.. ...__.- ow rcompy-: re begnningcon#ruction, walhtne atta hountlerm antlfiegtrew. ponaigie, or inH#I annp erpulretl on any bountlary wttnin 50 feet of a Dontl or wedantl. unlesstM area is elreatly rive opetlkleaisting roatla. bulltlingw etal 2. Limit Disturbance Area �ro.Rn<ederrogelumeeicdmlmge.rn.e'.e nntme.e- hrmeeDamninmte.seonns. tu1. n+mpammrdwnmaioiMItnbH.on Pn Bworeswhhaed I.b .a-twoomrngieb.N.mo. enpNtno the mM x Hama at eM given time. I� . _ •4' early*%t morn �.r rn cr prNingee Ilconsuu<tbn e.N15 or Begin beore Apir°II'SS. following requirements moat Oe adhered tc: 1. Fnlekrgitl eaess wlnm. eteblllietl to provWe far enax abc piling 2 Lmneaestureenm mores or replewdre rraen bountlery awnbrwnM enegement p an Dreperea wIN etlwuem ro ep.m antra a mama.rer ,agnrne <e.r.d an° to be Horse gown abpe.al ereaea bane tine pm pl.brmwemrtnmm.m 4. Aminimum 25 tom blMar enallgmarnreined from pemm�er anal. sum ea aik mom. areeapl diemNence IMt dal. tp a weler body InerolNtlOelag Ne coroBurl ale mom mutt a e. Damage ..aura mud la kepi open eve heed OHlyrraln 2rm Irwncnbrwrrrr�mw„r.ee s.almer. tom al.avwaua .n �ebwerb lrlmtraums «.va�wMlnra Inch, him a .Don rare lmwew HWrnesa Twn .woes. _ wnww login cwon paw win. ado n.r..w 2anab roaaea womo spurreare4 e�Ire�rmurl Neural a Mme us. ErMrmme eon nperrry.n W;�Qy� P.n wlw rwmw. m^n MHm ,..watt nwm was n.nm Contractor shall employ as many ofthese best managementpracaces to prevent soil from leaVlng the construction site. Ifevidence is found oferoded soillea ving the construction site, the Engineermay direct Site Contractor to implement additional best managementpractices at no additional cost to Owner. 7. Construct Permanent Controls anboXrnbn bean sor ntl atpmrwemr Shen. a nestl ng Regmr..nmro. ume wml Imwreop.• .ror on ropr.he. «wmm� ewkpmebt. wul a 1 p, Th- t ecommonP eppybra State Smmneter Dlronerge e�>nxraa mrmen.nt n«mwaarveetm.m prep croon our alb. Tnw pracmee mutt a Inata N before Ne corutructbn of eM Impnvlaue.unecw ml��ta ape Wrm n'N: Wrm nts'r�°mxH.r a egimwt Me uenU M Tn�S �mwnmr Management Menm b ere tab a et. wwv iry.or{retormwmrnun n. pa.Narb wwrasrw blvw.w.a eM wMkwM1s,lrorm r�.nkh�pac paauonru dlrrnner T. Rmm�w.nd mn.r «wu<m rogbangmnn n u^dmnammte. msanea snore orrrHe 31n1cnm who en 8090%cd�r reu, or a minimum a 9 i ensure cavermtlnurad co nedven<eae mad mmeraea pf dnuNatl ao mu#be Heb l.etl eawptbao e win work aey. wnn the ro ow ng If no prei pttn on wkM1 n 2a noun bforwe. end 2a hairs ftly aeN bM on a nlotpwmemN -In • Dlnurbed aroma tMt albct antl rn#n erroft soon ee nwm launationa or open utility trewnm. 10. Priorto nebilketion, snow or be, mud be mnovetl it uw.bn.b mbil-seas-1,.eIII. mnmetar a buil.lngi antler wnWunbn a where tklwred. st ub be, 10-201eet °wbe to wewrrmotlem Now m c hhu : en Ne cerminea. �e�b OlrtuNed el one.mere'n ge suremp hhY amal.e Homed sou wnnwed thng d.pre heginning work In a newaemlon mNeeire. S. Divert Upland Runoff PUrynae: DNerebn bnma "nmmem rpMrrnom ab«.e N. rom bmwnene m�eaa°rewm°n ailTh. rrcm tnna wnelruaionaiM. Rnquhemank: em 6warer ruaonre Moms 1 0 be be, d g 1 Yeuy. ne ar ma In eapowtln ad 8 1 .. Amgi Den or Y4awa 'tu i 10. Stabilize Soil at Final Orade 11111111. 1 P.aD 61eMlizin{Ne.hewnnwed ens mulch on nutting wMn h -.1.final &title is the art wwmlparem.a.bb wnn. wata<mn <ommpw. ReaUlrHnenL'. Wknn 4g noun anal grad ng Ne eapoeM all u+t be seeded end mu cnatl or aswrM wnn aroabn amm medmg. t Ire CIVIL ENGINEER KrebsB lanwrrg Coneub B t. 201 ers. In<. 164 I n .'. V But. Col ne 1 r VT 055 L e T (W2) 975-0375 F:(802)edI- ig ma'I�krebsandlanaing.wm or mF.,.uslW�� uVER%• gr �//�jj1A11110 FOR PERMIT REVIEW FIFTY SEVEN FAYETTE ROAD South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE f:(inlil Nl CIVIL DETAILS 15J00.3 57 Poyatte Lox nb In DRAWN BY ILM PROJECT NO. EL-153DD.3 DATE. 01/18 REVISED SCALE-. As NdW CD-3 Projacl P_ PERMIT DRAWINGS J I T ` F,Q \ _ Q Z _ - L ..__._._..__-i._ �• II j- I I I I I I .I T 20 C I I 0 20 SCALE OF FEET I I TREE SET TO BE PLUMB PRUNING SHALL BE DONE AFTER DELIVERY OF PLANTS AND AFTER PLANTS HAVE BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PRUNING PROCEDURES SHALL BE REVIEWED W ITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING. PRUNING SHALL BE DONE W ITH A CLEAN SHARP TOOL. CUTS SHALL BE MADE FLUSH, LEAVING NO STUBS. NO TREE PAINT SHALL BE USED. DEAD WOOD. SUCKERS AND BROKEN AND BADLY BRUISED BRANCHES SHALL BE REMOVED. Y MULCH. DO HOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAIN MULCH WEED -FREE FOR A MIN. OF ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING, BACKF ILL WITH EXISTING SOIL IN SANDY LOAM SOIL MIX IN 20% COMPOSTED ORGANIC MATERIAL WITH EXISTING SOIL. GENTLY PACK THE BACKFILL USING WATER TO SETTLE SOIL AND ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS, PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR COMPACTED NEW SUBGRADE TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT. C1� DECIDUOUD TREE PLANTING NTS TRUNK PROTECTION, REINFORCED RUBBER HOSE DOUBLE #10 GA. TWISTED GUYING WIRE, 3 PER TREE WITH TURNBUCKLE MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY. AND ROTATE TREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOB.. SET TOP OF MAIN ORDER ROOTS FLUSH TO GRADE OR I-.r HIGHER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOBS. 4' HIGH TEMPORARY SOIL SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF -- ROOT BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. ROPE, WIRE AND BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL. B' MIN. IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A W IRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL, CUT THE WIRE BASKET IN FOUR PLACES AND FOLD DOWN r INTO PLANTING HOLE. CUT ALL GIRDLING ROOTS. DUCK BILL TREE ANCHOR NOTES I. REMOVE ALL NON - BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL FROM PLANT PIT. 2. REMOVE ALL PLANT MATERIAL TAGS. FLAGGING. AND EXTRANEOUS LABELS. ETC. - SODDED LAWN FINISH PLANT SCHEDULE SCREENED LOAM - - - - - - 4' ,..� rKEYTQJ SOENTIFICIM04 --- I COMMON NAME SOE SM@IG DECIDUOUS TREES - --• AF I Ater K hetmaRll'ArTnuron` FREEMAN MAPLE 2.5.2• CAL AS SHOWN - COMPACTED SUBG RACE %150D LAWN I I .a MIX B IAC COATING TO ExTEND IN. BtLOw GMDE ICRETE PAVING; SEE ON p 1 fUTF i10 11DIFTURBED EARTH COFVACTED To Ma STD, PROCTOR IN IT Nrrs w6= •�e II{ • • �i • p• • AVER BFf MAN aO EDGE ER l e•. YB01 HE WAGNER NO. DESCRIPTION DATE _ Revlae SBFub,iset 05,29.2018 (j)BIKERACK J NTS "--`- TREE PROTECTION NOTES PLANTING NOTES _-_--_-----_-�-_ I. Proposed methods, and schedule for effecting tree and plant protection shall be submitted for I. All plant material in the plant schedule shall be nursery grown in accordance with ANSI 2. approval. Proposed methods. materials, and schedule for root pruning, construction pruning. and tree in accordance with Z.60.1 Standards for measurement of nurse stock. nursery - fertilization shall be submittee for approval. 2. All plants shall be guaranteed by the Contractor for a period of one year from date of 3. Certain specimen trees adjacent to construction areas and in other key locations will be identified by the Owner the Architect, tags. Lou in 3. receipt of Provisional Acceptance of the completed installation by the Owner. Replacement be Final Acceptance for - ----------- and and marked with red of any of these trees will result fines assessed at $5,000 per tree. Damage to all other trees on the property will be assessed at the plantings will required prior to any plants which are missing, not true to specifications, have died or are unhealthy or uncharacteristic of S 7 FAY ETT E R D 4. rate of 500 per inch caliper of the tree. $ P Afirewill be levied against the Contractor for each incident of construction inside tree 4. the species (due to excessive pruning, dragged or other reasons). All materials shall be selected and tagged at the nursery by Landscape Architect. ROUTE 7, SHELBURNE ROAD, S. a�� am es to trees, shrubs, and other vegetation will ul assessed the Architect and Owner in accoradgance with the International Society of Arboriculture (15,4) aide. S. 6. plant The Landscape Architect's approval is required for an plant material substitutions. P PP q Y P The Contractor is responsible for immediately notifying the Landscape Architect if any - SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 6. Trees or roots visibly damaged will Cause the Owner to withhold from the Contractor an assessed amount conforming to the requirements stipulated above for a period of two After that 7. plant quantity discrepancies exist between the planting plan and the plant list. All shrubs and trees will be sprayed with the anti -desiccant "Wilt-Pruf" ( or approved years. period the impact of the damaged to any tree will be assessed accordingly. equal) prior to the first Winter (no later that November 30). 7. If any trees or shrubs designated to be saved are damaged and replacement is required, a number 8, The Landscape Contractor have General Contractor locate and diameter of vees or shrubs of the same species and varieq, as specified by the Cwner and shall the all underground Architect, shall be furnished and planted by the Contractor. The total inch diameter of the utilities in areas to be landscaped prior to commencing any excavation. Adjustments to - tree locations will be allowed where utility conflicts are clearly a problem and with prior replacement trees or shrubs shall equal the diameter of the tree or shrub to be replaced. The Contractor shall not be liable for any loss or damage which occurs while the Contractor is ing instructions by Owner. Architect, Project 9. site approval by Landscape Architect. All bed, location be in field by Contractor for 8. comp) with given the or arborist working on the The Cyc ntactor's attention is Called to the fact that certain areas on the site natural plant shrub and tree shall staked the Architects e strut asoperLandscape woodland spaces and are to remain as natural woodlands. Therefore, all construction operations 10. approval prior to installation. Adjustments to plant beds shall be approved by Landscape Architect. LANDSCAPE PLAN must be performed in such a manner, which will preserve these existing natural environments as wood preserves. I I . 12. General Contractor is responsible for all erosion control measures during COnSCrUC[IOn. - All disturbed be indicated in I -'; 9. 10. ------ - '- Designated areas of trees, understory, and wildflowers are to remain untouched and unharmed. Clearly mark all clearing limits in the field and accompany Architect on a joint review of clearinf limits before clearing operations have commenced. Limit of clearing is generally defined as the limit 13. topsoiledthe areas are to to soiled and seeded or sodded, as Planting plan. Mulch shall consist of double -shredded hardwood mulch or approved equal and 11. of grading. Galvanized chain link fencing, 4 feet high. Stakes for fencing shall be 8 feet steel Contractor is responsible for providing samples of mulch to Landscape Architect. Mulch details. 12. galvanized posts, driven a minimum of 3 feet into the ground. Posts shall be spaced 10 feet on center maximum. Prior 14. Plant materials as Shown on plan and - IC is the Intent Of this Contract CO avoid any disturbance [O existing [fees Or shrubs On - - to start of demolition work and clearing and grubbing operations, tree protection fencing shall be installed in accordance with the following: site other than those specifically designated for trans lain or removal. P y gn P 13. 14. Fencing shall be metalled at the tree protection areas indicated on the Drawings. Fencing be IS I S. Liquidated damages for trees damaged by construction operation shall be $500 per caliper Inch. Shrubs shall be $ I00 each. - - - - - I5. Shall installed a minimum of feet beyond the drip line of the trees to be protected, unless otherwise approved by the Architect Where construction will be in close to existing trees designated to remain, roots shall be 16. During construction, and until the end of warranty period, existing trees that are _ determined by Landscape Architect be deep JOB NO. 739 SCALE: 20- V-0' proximity pruned. Proximity shall be as determined in the field by the Landscape Architect or Arborist. showing signs of stress as the are to root fertilized, two injections per caliper inch per tree at 18" - 24" depth with Peter's DRAWN BY: Ns 16. Suitable means for root pruning include,trenching vibrating plow, and Water jet pruning. Any method which tears roots or disturbs the soil beyand the grading limit is unacceptable. 20/20/20 fertilizer or Landscape Architect approved equal. DATE 05.7.2018 17. Trees to receive root pruning shall be reviewed by an arborist for canopy pruning, fertilization and 17. Contractor is responsible for verifying and confirming all Ian[ counts as supplied b the P fy g g P pP Y 40 18. trench backfrll recommendations. Selective clearing within tree protection areas shall only be performed when and as directed by the Landscape Architect with field conditions as constructed. Any discrepancies shall be reported to Landscape Architect for approval and direction. I L I T5 Landscape Architect Refer to Section 02115, selective clearing. 18. Tree transplanting shall be performed by a suitable hydraulic tree spade, sized as 19. Except as otherwise indicated or requested by Landscape Architect, temporary protection devices necessary to perform the work. and facilities installed during course of the work shall be removed only after all Work which may injure or damage trees and Is completed. 19. Prior to commencement of any construction, all existing trees to remain shall receive plants tree protection fence at outer edge of dripline whenever possible. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F- r.......... ARCHITECTS 525 Hercules Drive Suite Two Colchester, VT 05446 802.655.5020 802.622.6567 wiem—lamphere.com Z O o W F H W Q Z o M z m x 0 0 N NO. DATE I REVISION: June 4, 2078 P.. noa1H srwEr. /n. -1 O N — 2017045 C—E— xn MR/KD KD LEVEL 1 PLAN Al rf1 EAST (DEMO) \A2.0�j 1" _ 10'_0. _... _— EXISTING BUILDING PHOTO JF (f 9)(Gl REMOVE EXG GOOSENECK LIGHTING, 1, Tr DOWER TO REMAIN FOR SIGN LIG R LIGHTING ' Wiemann Lam here LEVEL 4 / 203' - 6" ARCHITECTS 525 Hercules Drive Suite Two Colchester, VT 05446 802.655.5020 802.622.6567m wieannlamphere.com _ LEVEL 4 203' - 6" LEVEL6" z O FIxTVREcv wn EXG KITCHEN EXG EXHAUST - EXHAUST FAN VENTS ______ _ ___ __r ---- r _— _--� UAIf: May 7, 2018 61 017045 OMAR hIJ A11ROX 1u, L 1 mmmmlmlmnln ry n.a, JI_ ��� I'� LEVEL1 ELEVATIONS - 203'-6" DEMO BASEMENT LEVEL 19�• _ 6" .wrcr��..e... A2.01 PROVIDE JUNCTION BOX FOR FUTURE SIGN LIGHTING, TYPICALATALLSIGNAGE LOCATIONS. REUSE EXISTING CIRCUITS WHERE POSSIBLE 3 1 3 3 A&I0 AV A3.10 .__..\ A3.10 2 TENANTSIGNAGE, MATERIAL2 TENANTSIGNAGE, A310 ,, MATERIALI 1005F MAX. MATERIAL 1005E MAX. MATERIALS MATERIAL MATERIAL3 MATERIAL MATERIAL 1 I, MATERIAL 3 MATERIAL ^� • - -�-. MATERIAL4 Ell EXTEND CONCRETE BASE TO NEW SURFACE MOUNTED LED SURFACE MOUNTED LED FOOTPRINT, TYPICALDOWN NEW WIN OW, MATERIAL4 :3 OF CANOPIES - LIGHTOLIER A3.10 3 OF CANOPIES - LIGHTOLIER 3 SZTTEQfN4 TC LM, 7R SLIM SURFACE 7DR0UIND 1 - DRAM SURFACE N LICHT41 UNDERSIDE 'A' HEXG A3.10 A3.10 A3.10 A3.10 3 EAST(NEW) A3.10 .02 1'-10'-0' /A -Al I) � E II 1 MATERIAL 5- LEVELI_ _ 2"' - 6" _ _ WOOD SCREEN — CLEAN & PAINT EXG DECKING & BASEMENTLEVEL STKVCTVKEOFDECK 193' - 6; (2� 1 L 7 IAL 55-1 A3.1z 4 r—. A3.t0 rf1WE5T(NEW) .02 1'- 10'-0' MATERIAL KEY MARK MATERIAL AREA MATERIALI STANDING SEAM VERTICAL METAL 45395F SIDING MATERIAL2 HORIZONTAL 51PING I -WOOD 5015F CLAPBOARD (STAINED) MATERIAL3 HORIZONTAL SIDING 2-AEPSPAN, 628SF PERCEPTION COLLECTION, PC40-12 MATERIAL4 VEN EER STONE-BORAL VERSETTA 8225F STONE, LEDGESTONE MATERIALS EXISTING E.I.F.S. - REPAIRAS REQ'D 3t 15051 SF PAINT NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES LIGHT FIXTURE a • , OPEN IOC EXISTING STAIRCASE PARKING. NEW HANPRAII. J PATTERNED FILM, TO BE 0BSCURINGFR0STED hiLh1 SURFACE MOUNTED LED SELECTED BY ARCHITECT 5 SOLYX IXL-1-1 CLEARFINE BRUSHED DOWN LIGHTOVNDERSIDE - A31 0FCAN0PIE5-LIGHTOLIER TYR 57R SLIM SURFACE 7" ROVND MATERIAL 1 MATERIAL2 ATERIAL 3 r- ----- PATTERNED FILM •--- ----MATERIAL 4 �--IIRI DEIrL coNNLa ioN HORIZONTAL SIDI NG 1 i21S0VTH (NEW)I 2.02 11-10'-0" 3 1 Wiemann Lam here _ 2_LEVEL_ I / ARCHITECTS 525 Hercules Drive Suite Two Colchester, VT 05446 802.655.5020 802.622.6567 wiemannlamphere.com --4 -MATERIAL 5 m r-- —1x4 CEDAR BOARDS CLEAN AND PAINT EXISTING STEEL DECKING AND STRUCTURE REMWE&REPEACE LXG BUILDING MOUNTED STEEL STAIR LIGHT FIXTURE E%G BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE - EXG KITCHEN — FXI AUST FAN EXG EXHAUST VENTS MATERIAL - • j(� MATERIAL 1 1 APPROX. u III�II Ll 1:1 -... GRADE 11 I.. I LEVEL 1 BASEMENT LEVE L h NORTH (NEW) 193'-6" A2.02 V-10'-O' ...L` ,TFI', PLANNER 658-7955 Mr. Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 fi e,, � ( J „� 7Y" 05482 PC/W061 December 19, 1994 Re: Sewer Allocation for L&M Park, Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that the City approves an additional sewer allocation of 630 gpd for the above referenced project. This project is served by the City's Bartlett Bay Treatment Facility which has sufficient capacity to handle the additional demand. Please note that you are required to pay a sewer allocation fee to the City of $2.50 per gallon. Please submit the fee payment to Zoning Administrator, Richard Ward. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need further assistance. �erely, t 41-ith, Planner JW/mcp cc: Richard Ward Raymond Belair Carolyn Root (FAx) ur State of Vermont WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS GULATIONS INVOLVED Case #: WW-4-0384-4 Environmental Protection Rules Applicant: Milot-Larkin Partnership Effective September 10, 1982 Address: 76 St. Paul_ Street Burl-ington, VT 05401 This project, consisting of amending Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-084-3 to change the use of the 22,000 square foot building to be 3,750 square feet of retail space, a. 170 seat. restai.iran.t (2 meals per day) and an indoor r.ecreati.onal playground for 200 participants known as Bananas University to be constructed on Lot C-1 of Subdivisi-on Permit EC-4-1.650-2 located off Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (11 No alterations to the building that would change or affect the exterior water supply or sewage disposal, or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. (2) In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permi_ttee and be subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. (3) The Vermont Department of Health is to be contacted in regard to any regulations and/or licenses required by their Department. They may be reached at 802-863-7220). (4) The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for pi_ibli.c buildings under 1.0 V.S.A.. Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater. Disposal Permit. ( 5 ) All conditions set forth in Subdivision Permit 4FC-4-1.650-2 dated September 29, 1994 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. WW-4-0384-4 Page 2 (6) All conditions set forth in Water. Supply & Wastewater Disposal. Permit 0 WW-4-0384-3 dated June 17, 1993.shall. remain i.n'effect except as modified or amended herein. SEWAGE DISPOSAL (71 The project is approved for connection to the South Burlington Airport Parkway wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 6,160 gallons of sewage per. day. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 28th da.v 'of November, 1994. .Jack Long. Commissioner Department of Environmental. Conservation B y Ernest P. ristianson Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Pl-anning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Act 250 Coordinator -Louis Bori_e Water. Supply Division Department of Health Department, of Labor and Tndustry Fitzpatrick-Laeweltvn, Tnc. j��,�7,6- Gregg B e I d o c k December 9, 1994 Joe Weith Planning Office 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vennont 05403 Dear Joe: Bananas University Realty, Ltd. has been allocated 6160 gallons of water/day. After recalculating Fitzpatrick-Llewellyn's numbers and meeting with Ernie and Carolyn at A.N.R_, it has been determined that we need 715 more gallons. This is due to the kids center having originally been viewed as a health club without locker rooms. We are now getting a health department license. This requires an additional 715 gallons. This is based upon 50 seats for parents/kids. There are actually 36 seats. I will ask Ernie if he wants to recalculate for 36 seats. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, cc: Ernie Christensen 2117 Dorset Street 9 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 • (802) 985-9446 PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 November 3, 1994 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Revised Access, Bananas University Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 A recent inspection of the Bananas University site revealed that the recently approved second access to your underground parking facility was not constructed as approved (see enclosed plan). The approval specifically limited the width of this curb cut to 63 feet and it was measured to be 100 feet wide. This access must be revised to be identical with the approved plan. Compliance with the plan is necessary in order to obtain the Certificate of Occupancy for the building. Also, the dumpster located in the front of the building must be placed in its approved location. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sin rely, r� ' `� R ym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp 1 Encl cc: L&M Partnership M E M O R A N D U M To: Richard Ward, South Burlington Zoning Administrative Officer From: Raymond J. Belair, South Burlington Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Bananas University - Site Visit on 11/14/94 Date: November 14, 1994 --- dumpster must be relocated to its approved location and screened. --- underground parking spaces should be striped. --- floodlight must be removed from in front of bank. --- sidewalk steps at end of parking lot, must be continued to the cul-de-sac. --- three (3) parking spaces have been added to the rear of the building, approval for these changes must be obtained from Planning Commission --- bike rack must be installed. --- curb cut for second access to underground parking must be reduced in width. r"V 'L(T� State of Vermont 40 Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Milot-Larkin Partnership 76 St. Paul St. Burlington, VT 05401 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Essex Jct.,Vermont 05452 Telephone # 879-6563 TDD #1-800-253-0191 November 17, 1994 RE: WW-4-0384-4 ; Bananas University 22000sf bldg for indoor rec. 200 participants mun. w/s 1160 gpd located Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the referenced permit on 11/07/94, including a fee of $417.6 paid for by Check Number 197. This application falls under the Water/Wastewater: Greater than 1000 GPD Program Area, and under the Performance Standards for this program area, we have 45 days of 'in-house' time for our review of your application. If we need further information from you in order to reach a decision on your application, the time we wait for your submittal of that information does not count against the allowable in-house time specified in the performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 days in-house, please contact this office at 879-6563. Please note that this does not constitute receipt of your application under the requirements of Act 250. If you have questions relating to Act 250 jurisdiction, a District Coordinator may be reached at 879-6563. o the Wastewa er Management Division, ne,. Roberge Administrative Secretary c South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard TDD: 1-800-253-0191 Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 16, 1994 Charles Van Winkle FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Sewer Allocation, Bananas University, L&M Park Dear Mr. Van Winkle: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is to confirm the fact that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on February 22, 1994 allocated 6,160 gpd of sewer demand for the proposed Bananas University building at L&M Park. This property is served by the Bartlett Bay Treatment facility which has sufficient capacity to handle this demand. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sxncorely, JoeV Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 11 March 1994 Mr. Joe Weith City Planner City Of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Bananas University, Municipal Impact Form & Sewer Allocation File: 93064 Dear Mr. Weith: On behalf of Gregg Beldock we are currently preparing an Act 250 amendment application. In order to provide an accurate response to the District Environmental Commission, we would ask that you please complete the enclosed municipal impact questionnaire. In addition, would you please provide a letter confirming the town has the capacity to accommodate the sewage flow expected from this development in the overall park allocation. The flow breakdown according to the Environmental Protection Rules is as follows: 170 Seat quality restaurant, @ 30 gpd/ seat = 5,100 gpd 3,750 S.F. retail store, 4 employees @ 15 gpd = 60 gpd Bananas University, Maximum day 200 attendees 5 gpd / attendee = 1,000 gpd Total sewage demand = 6,160 gpd Should you have any questions regarding the municipal impact form or the project please don't hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, FITZPATRICKK--LLE�/WEELLYN INCORPORATED r )� ` eut"' Charles Van Winkle Project Manager cc: Gregg Beldock Design 0 Inspection 0 Studies 9 Permitting 0 Surveying City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 26, 1994 Gerald Milot P.O. Box 4193 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Landscaping at L&M Park Dear Mr. Milot: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the latest approved landscaping plan for L&M Park. I have highlighted in green all the landscaping which will have to be planted before a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) can be issued for the Bananas University building (some of these trees were planted since this plan was prepared). I have also enclosed a copy of that portion of the Bananas University approval which lists other items that need to be completed before the C.O. can be issued. The sidewalk should be constructed to the cul-de-sac on the north side of Fayette Road. Also, the two (2) areas circled in red on the plan are not constructed as shown on this plan. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si6cely, " j � Ra J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls cc: John Larkin Greg Beldock l/14 State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT CASE NO: 4C0877-4 APPLICANT: Larkin-Milot Partnership LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A.,Chapter 151 (Act 250) and Vermont ADDRESS: 410 Shelburne Road Environmental Protection South Burlington, VT 05403 Rules District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues a Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0877-4 pursuant to the authority vested in it in 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to the "Permittees" as "Grantees". This permit specifically incorporates Subdivision Permit #EC-4-1650-2 consisting of amending Subdivision Permit #EC-4-1650-1 to further subdivide the 9.53 acre lot into four lots identified as Lot C-1 being 2.99 acres containing the building approved in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permits #WW-4-0384-2 & #WW-4-0384-3; Lot D being 2.54 acres containing the pre-existing apartment complex known as Larkin Terrace (consisting of a total of 61 bedrooms); and Lot E-1 being 1.42 acres and a 0.43 acre lot each being subject to Deferral of Permit DE-4-2000. This project is located off Shelburne Road and Fayette Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. The Permittees, and their assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete and maintain the project only as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0877 and amendments remain in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of Subdivision Permit #EC-4-1650-2 issued on September 29, 1994 by the Regional Engineer, Wastewater Management Division, Agency of Natural Resources in compliance with Vermont State Environmental Protection Rules. 3. Failure to comply with any of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 6090 (b). Dated at Essex Junction, VT, this; day of October, 1994. BY Louis Borie Environmental Board Coordinator 4C0877-4/eb for the District #4 Commission State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests,. Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Larkin Milot Partnership 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 �h _- [fM bA_ AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Essex Jct.,Vermont 05452 Telephone # 879-6563 TDD #1-800-253-0191 September 29, 1994 RE: EC-4-1650-2 ; L & M Park 2 lot commercial sub. Lot C-1 2.99A Lot D - 2.54 acres mun. water & sewer located Shelburne Rd./Fayette Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the referenced permit on 09/23/94, including a fee of $300 paid for by Check Number 611 & 623. This application falls under the Multi -Lot Subdivision Program Area, and under the Performance Standards for this program area, we have 45 days of 'in- house' time for our review of your application. If we need further information from you in order to reach a decision on your application, the time we wait for your submittal of that information does not count against the allowable in-house time specified in the performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 days in-house, please contact this office at 879-6563. Please note that this does not constitute receipt of your application under the requirements of Act 250. If you have questions relating to Act 250 jurisdiction, a District Coordinator may be reached at 879-6563. The Deferral of Permit will be processed with the Subdivision Amendment. or the Wastewater Management Division, ne L. Roberge ~-�-- Administrative Secretary c South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard TDD: 1-800-2-3-0191 d»gi;�na1 Off(!Essex cc T PIttsfor c 3 N S,minyfi�-! I S*. State of Vermont DEFERRAL OF PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED: 18 V.S.A. 1218-1220 and Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 3- Subdivisions, 3.06 Deferral of Permit PERMIT NO.: DE-4-2000 APPLICANT & ADDRESS: Larkin Milot Partnership 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 LOCATION OF SUBDIVISION: Off Fayette Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISION: Retain Lot E-1, 1.42 acres and a .43 acre lot as ROW. CONDITIONS: (1) The deed for a parcel purchased under the provisions of this permit must include the following "Waiver of Development Rights." All subsequent deeds, leases or contracts of sale must also contain the waiver unless a subdivision permit is obtained. Notice of the purchaser's name and address must be filed with the Wastewater Management Division. "WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENTAL RIGHTS" "In order to comply with the State of Vermont Environmental Protection Rules on the subdivision of lands and disposal of waste including sewage, the grantee shall not construct or erect a structure or building on the parcel of land conveyed herein, the useful occupancy of which will require the installation of plumbing and sewage treatment facilities or convey this land without first complying with said State regulations. The grantee by acceptance of this deed acknowledges that this lot may not qualify for approval for development under the appropriate environmental protection or health regulations and the State may deny an application to develop the lot." Page 2 Deferral of Permit DE-4-2000 (2) If the parcel being acquired is to be considered for building development at some future date, the purchaser understands that the information required by Section 3-08 of the rules must be submitted for evaluation. If such information does not meet the Environmental Protection Rules, permission to building on the lot will be denied. (3) The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for recording this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 7 day of 1994. c For the Record South Burlington South Burlington EC-4-1650-2 Jack Long, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Irene L. Roberge Administrative Secretary Planning Commission Selectboard FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 23 September 1994 Mr. Ernie Christianson Regional Engineer District 4 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: L & M Park, South Burlington; EC-4-1650, WW-4-0384; LUP 4CO877 File: 93064/88047 Attn: Ms. Jessanne Wyman, Assistant Regional Engineer Dear Ms. Wyman: We thank you and Ernie for the extended period of time you took recently discussing this Project, and its proposed subdivision(s). As a result, on behalf of our Client, Larkin Milot Partnership, we are applying herewith for a 2-lot subdivision, as explained below and on the enclosed plans. Please find enclosed to this effect: 1. Two copies of "L&M Park, Proposed Subdivision Plan", dated December 1990, last revised 22 September 1994. 2. Two copies "Application for Subdivision Permit". 3. Fee check (L&M Partnership #611) for $300.00. As we discussed at our meeting, there are at least a couple of viewpoints, all with minor differences, regarding whether or not Lot C on the Proposed Subdivision Plan has a "residual" lot size of 2.99 acres when the McDonald's leaseland is taken out (4.15 acres - 1.16 acres). We do understand "your rules" on subdivision require each lease to be processed as a parcel of subdivided land. And, since Lot C was not subdivided under these rules, Lot C-1 could not exist as a residual lot, even though parcel CA McDonalds, was leased and "subdivided". Although we can't agree entirely with this interpretation, we do agree with you that filing for the subdivision of Lot C-1 at this time is the most expeditious way to proceed. And, as you suggested, we are also asking for a subdivision permit for Lot D at the same time. Our Client prefers not to seek, Design 0 Inspection 0 Studies 0 Permitting 0 Surveying Regional Engineer 23 September, 1994 File: 93064/88047 Page Two at this time, deferral permits for either the "Item #2" parcel (R.O.W. to Farrell property) or EA the residual parcel around E-2, the Merrill leasehold subdivision. Since our Client has elected to subdivide Parcel D, we are including the information you requested regarding the existing structure, Larkin Terrace; as obtained from the Owner: Number 1 - Bedroom Units = 46 Number 2 - Bedroom Units = 11 Number 3 - Bedroom Units = 4 Total Units = 61 Because of the pending lease agreement, as we discussed, we would appreciate any action you could take to expedite this subdivision, especially since all the water - supply, waste water, and "Act 250" permits are in place. Again, we thank you for your time and assistance in this matter. Please call us if you have any questions. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Douglas R. FitzPatrick, P.E. c.c. L&M Partnership Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Lewis Sussman, Esq. Gregg Beldock FITZ,PATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 26 September 1994 Mr. Ernie Christianson Regional Engineer District 4 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: L&M Park, South Burlington; EC-4-1650, WW-4-0384; LUP 4CO877 File: 93064/88047 Attn: Ms. Jessanne Wyman, Assistant Regional Director Dear Ms. Wyman: We submitted, on 22 September 1994, on behalf of our Client, an Application for Subdivision, along with appropriate plans, fees, and information. Will you please amend the process to include the Deferral Applications (retained) for the parcels designated as E - 1 and "Item #2" (road R.O.W. to Farrell property). Enclosed please find: 1. Two copies Application for Deferral of Permit for Retained Parcel E - 1. 2. Two copies Application for Deferral of Permit for Retained Parcel designated "Item #2". 3. Fee check for $100.00 ($50 each, L&M Partnership check #623). We understand, when these Applications (Subdivision and Deferral) are granted, your office will be satisfied that the entire "Commercial Area", as designated on the Plan by areas C, D, and E, will be completely permitted, either for subdivision or deferral, as shown on the Plan, and that the roadway to the Residential Area will be completely separate from all other designated areas. Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying Regional Engineer 26 September 1994 File: 96064/88047 Page Two We would appreciate your utilizing the Plans submitted on 23 September, since no changes are necessary to apply for the deferrals. Again, many thanks for your time and assistance, especially your telephone call this morning. Please feel free to call, as usual, should you have any questions. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Douglas R. FitzPatrick, P.E. c.c. L&M Partnership Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Lewis Sussman, Esq. Gregg Beldock FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services State of Vermont r Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council September 21, 1994 Gregg Beldock 1525 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Beldock, AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Phone #(802) 879-6563 TDD 1-800-253-0191 Subject: Case #EC-4-1650-1 & WW-4-0384-2, L&M Park, Route 7, Shelburne, VT On September 21, 1994, I met with you, Mr. Douglas FitzPatrick, P.E., and Jessanne Wyman, Assistant Regional Engineer regarding the above subject property. Basically the discussion centered around creating a leased lot around the 22,000 square foot building approved in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permits WW-4-0384-2 and WW-4-0384-3. On December 22, 1992 this office issued Subdivision Permit EC-4- 1650-1 which, in part, created a 9.53 acre lot. This lot included the 22,000 square foot building (which we understand has been scaled back in size) and the pre-existing buildings known as Larkin Terrace. Since it is intended to lease to .you 2.99 acres of the 9.53 acres, we have determined that an amended subdivision permit needs to be issued for your lot and the balance of the land on which is Larkin Terrace. We will need a subdivision application form, a two hundred dollar application. fee, a description of the occupancy (number of one, two or three bedroom units) at Larkin Terrace and plans prepared by a qualified consulant accurately depicting each lot. Upon receipt of the completed application and requested information, and barring any unforseen complications, I do not see any reason the subdivision permit would not be issued. I realize that you are under a time constraint to finalize your areement to lease the property. To minimize any further confusion and prevent future delays, I would suggest that you bring the subdivision application and requested information in and let Ms. Wyman or me review its completeness. That way we can advise you if any other informtion is needed or that the application is complete and we onl.v need to I-oq-in the application and issue the permit. TDD: 1-800-2S3-0191 Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury Gregg Beldock September 21, 1994 Page 2 Please contact this office should you have any additional questions. Sincerely, Ernest Christianson. Regional Engineer c Douglas FitzPatrick Louis Sussman City of South Burlington Act 250 Commission -Louis Rorie AAE :17" P� VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TT Sanitarian ���/�- `�� "`� ate ` !`� ` Time In l�' 30 Time Out County r Town Estab. Licensed ❑ I.D. No. Licensee 77 :— Unlicensed ❑ 1(azya"Ca� ; Pending Address rCr�t'[ �� ,/7G1C PxO�� Phone No. Person C Sub'ect Title :iated City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 1, 1994 Lance Llewellyn Fitz Patrick- Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Revise Access to Bananas University Dear Mr. Llewellyn: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision for the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on August 9, 1994. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the plan be recorded within 90 days of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i erel , Jo Weith, City Planner JW / mcp 1 Encl cc: L&M Partnership City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 1, 1994 Lance Llewellyn FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Revise Access to Bananas University Dear Mr. Llewellyn: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the August 9, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerel , , Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: L&M Partnership ra at � 1 • r MOTION OF APPROVAL L&M PARTNERSHIP 8/9/94 I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of L&M Partnership to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 square foot movie theater (1,000 seats) a 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3,500 square foot restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive -through service, located on Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of adding a second access to the underground parking facility as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "L&M Park, Site & Utilities Plan" prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. with a last revision date of 7/12/94, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Pursuant to Section 19.103b of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a curb cut of 63 feet in width to accommodate the new access. It is the Commission's opinion that allowing a curb cut greater than 36 feet in width will not compromise vehicular safety on Fayette Road due to the one-way nature of the access to the underground parking facility. 3. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Chair or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. 4. Any changes to the final plat plans shall require Planning Commission approval. J • /� ` .fie- �;!L.u-`� xfgo�N';• � �I�: i �. i MOTION OF APPROVAL L&M PARTNERSHIP I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of L&M Partnership to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 square foot movie theater (1,000 seats) a 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3,500 square foot restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive -through service, located on Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of adding a second access to the underground parking facility as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "L&M Park, Site & Utilities Plan" prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. with a last revision date of 7/12/94, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Pursuant to Section 19.103b of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a curb cut of 63 feet in width to accommodate the new access. It is the Commission's opinion that allowing a curb cut greater than 36 feet in width will not compromise vehicular safety on Fayette Road due to the one-way nature of the access to the underground parking facility. 3. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Chair or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. 4. Any changes to the final plat plans shall require Planning Commission approval. Memorandum - Planning August 9, 1994 agenda items August 5, 1994 Page 4 6) RICE HIGH SCHOOL- CONCESSION STAND - SITE PLAN This project consists of the construction of a 160 square foot concession stand. The last review of the site by the Planning Commission was on July 13, 1993 (minutes enclosed) . This property located at 99 Proctor Avenue lies within the R-4 District. It is bounded on the north by single family residences, on the east by Burlington Country Club and Meadowbrook condominiums, on the south by commercial buildings along Joy Drive, and on the west by single family residences. Access/circulation: Access is provided via a 50 foot curb cut on Proctor Avenue. No changes are proposed for this existing access. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 4.5% (maximum allowed is 20%). Overall coverage is 13.1% (maximum allowed is 40%) . Setback requirements are met. Landscaping: There is no minimum landscaping requirement for this project, based on building costs, and no additional plantings are proposed. Parking: No additional parking required. Sewer: No additional allocation required. 7) L&M PARTNERSHIP - REVISE ACCESS - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of revising access and circulation to a recently approved 22,500 square foot retail/indoor recreation/restaurant building (Bananas University) . The revision consists of adding a second access to the underground parking area. The sketch plan was reviewed on 6 / 28 / 94 ( minutes enclosed) . Access / circulation: The main curb cut on Fayette Road serving Bananas University will be increased in width from 27 feet to 63 feet to accommodate the new access. Section 19.103b of the zoning regulations limits the width of a commercial driveway to 36 feet. The Planning Commission may modify this requirement pursuant to this same section of the zoning regulations. Staff does not see a problem with a 63 foot curb cut since the access to the underground parking garage is one-way entrance only. 4 Memorandum - Planning August 9, 1994 agenda items August 5, 1994 Page 5 Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: The following coverage information pertains to the commercial portion of the L&M Park project. Building coverage is 65,276 square feet (maximum allowed is 125,453 square feet). Overall coverage is 251,258 square feet (maximum allowed is 292,723 square feet) . No change in setbacks. Parkin: No change Landscaping: The new access will displace one (1) tree. This tree is being relocated to another location on the site. 5 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 5, 1994 Lance Llewellyn FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Revise Access to Bananas University Dear Mr. Llewellyn: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, and Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 9, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. cerely, 9 � J e Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: L&M Partnership ma`s ,y� N/F SOUTH BURLINGTON CiH.RRYSLER PLYMOUTH ---------------- _ I 1 II � L Pg j w jt/ • I F --- • . a AY / _ __ __ __ - I I I f L TABLL OF STRUCTURES NO. RIM /NV. COMMENT D/ 1 207.1 194.5 DI 2 201.1 196.1 DI 3 200.5 795.5 DI 4 201.0 196.0 DI 5 195.6 190.E DI 6 195.6 190.1 DI 7 186.9 781.9 DI 8 186.9 781.0 DI 9 190.7 185.7 DI 10 188.5 183.5 DI 11 18Z9 182.9 DI 12 187.9 182.0 Of 13 185.7 180.7 DI 14 78J.0 17Z 0 01 15 182.5 176.5 DI 76 199.8 194.0 OI 17 201.0 195.5 DI 18 20l.O /94.g D, l9 IB5.7 fB20 - DI 49 0-02 7 /96.0 0121 2004 196.5 DI 22 2010 195.5 DI 23 2C`lO 196.0 DI 24 2oo.5 /95.0 DI 25 197.7 I870 RAISE FRAME TO GRADE D/ 48 165.7 18C O MH 1 207.8 194.8 MH 2 197.7 790.1 MH 3 1689 1820 Df 99 DI 26 1990. 1888 1935 184.00 Of 96 /88 0 /62.5 D/ 97 19,.0 164.0 Dl 98 r85 5 I 5 wF,cm wua�-.E- - oQ 4PE-P+GC�c.7 mac¢ � wc_ '- �- FF•P2G Ste. Pc� C-�Z c0,-G�-:�T, l8�wf PARKING LOT DETAIL' SHOWING UNDERDRAIN G� ,� �//T Gvs, OC A, ✓LOG E t� + i. / / ;�,_-_� I REFERENCE PLANS 1. FOR ALL PROPERTY LINE AND RIGHT -OF -MAY .P,` "L & MATION PARK SEE PNSDISION PLAN", IV I _ I i 4..,- --' ^ic+�- ��� p >-11 J BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED �, DRAWING NUMBER D-3724, DATED DEC. 1990 e \I 2. FOR DETAIL OF SHELBURNE ROAD (RTE. 7), o+si--� SEE "L 8 M PARK, TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANS AND DETAILS", D-397B, D-3979, D4031-D4035 •/ j l.. _. --- Q F Jl- ��,- ' BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN I - - - - NCORPORATED _ _.. \A REST. � LEGEND \ D+ y, � �- i;� ->) v � i D ; •�•••�••�••� PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE RIGHT -OF -WA Y/EASEMENT LINE ................ as_ _ _ _ . SETBACK LINE - - - - - - - PROPOSED CONTOUR ^ _ 17^S- 'i -EX1571NC SANITARY SEW£R/1WANHOLE ,�,, 8'S--♦- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER/MANHOLE -ram_ ! I EA7SDNC WATER LINE PROPOSED WATER LJWE, AL VE/)iYDRANT ACINTOSH AVE.� PROPOSED STORM SEN£R/INLET / J F •u PROPOSED UNDERDRAIN e " FAYETTE ROb Fn PROPOSED SANITARY FORCE MAIN -� ,.1 • '� .1__,r�t �c < • Oli➢.nW''?°n PFe: RIP -RAP - �6 n HE 1,, m "�__..�,,,,,,,,9� - � PROPOSED CURB I J T,030 R F �" I STORM SEWER/INLET -�� of So. Burlington ,xsr ram- t 1 \�, �\ �� �.`.. lw i .- 1 �I I :v_ I. �'..v.....FEe I I/-� I I• I I •"`...`--ram''' GRAPHIC SCALE G�cw __ 1� ' � � V A -' y _ 1 1 � � � -yam n'a.-, I u •A I � I '° '° (0+ real' ) 1 inch = 40 rL IT IS THE USERS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THESE DRAWINGS INCLUDE 774E LATEST REWSIONS I r `I ACT 250 AMENDMENT -tiFy�•..E fPRELIM/NARY PLAT I M 11 1 -I 1 I I r L i• \ -1JE.J E+i .•/V TffiLF_�HI?.l6 RNAL PLAT CONSTRUCRON - j li '� \ SOLID BOX /NDICA MS APPROVALS STAGE THE 0£S1CN IS CURRENTLY W. P2�C.+C1 E1T¢Y.-I.i2•,4 csi F� -_ & M PARK iQ iI I I 1 - _ - ..-. _ 1 J r t EF � .UERMON 9 _ _ _ / b ITE & UTILITIES PLAN--- ( a .. <-"� L N�IF FARRELL •ice• ■ � 2�i '� .: 9+, U G,.Jr ��,./ ,1� � - IPOJECt xUYXT (p ✓.li-'tl �Qi '.-�(%�!_.... �'Y�v CS:�°Q- [ 'l�il MI Q6•N'�•E G2P,7E5 aDG '7Td YTJi:c Td{LE �ij- QE 0W'r., :W- ✓ 2 ..,G a, 0 t E Ww6, D (c.;>a, .�E.'r-ot �q.nw,tauu �.I at7+�'... mD -i'�+se>�•; ..:_.: 9, lzl✓V e, 1110- -ewE2 Arc ,1.-�o Efsevo+•-K- 7 :e..y2 acew.aearurze.c :5e ..Tn� TI�s;yE�Sfi ._, '¢n .u, zC...c �.�. g .. .1 <C- 1._Rs - 'r 21r. - ^ 4c ,+<•Y8, QC"'+ZG �^TOEu, Y R SZQ I; ��jpQ4G°3�C�M�M eaDh� q �.�_<„ nor-r�.i,�rfi , ,o GaR..fc ¢era. �.�e. T„_..- ,.c-, Gal.-+,.-ca. •srcm�. ,,. .. : ?.E. ._<. _:� .- _::-- ,,. .....;E zz 9z ter.' -,.<T G,e % �LS���� U LIV DUNE i990 A, 7,. Ii a7 'il ¢E..:SG •rc c,.., -.e.w G¢ 5 ....... -m�e,• '�e.+,��c i � FLI INCORPORATED �cql fYE�/r'-aG Vf utrf+O-M:.� Qpr.,.,x'•- Eu�4Fw-�G.4 F: .i.'Y1.•.1, SG..Y:•.Ei EYr'lf:�t'f ..�E.�/6A- u 14 9.=i.'11 Ctv+^iF! VY'Jf."'-..'T t! �4.+.. 'j0 2 i^. 2E _e �i. h, �"e-TGG.i.JT .•a,^,4 bEQv,CES,P'T'w^.RQ'J Qn,.aS 'e on�r,e xu„ern 7 V"C 9, a+cay_v� ( :_..pr P°.¢r-,..+r..+, aE ...�{b. a2cw ^'i_ u.�: :+. ��ua-: •L 19 Y♦ 92 P.6.+hP.. 4¢x:d4 D 7.E,8 noD woESCyvcu.ao vamr.,.Jy u+c,Nc[xl"c .No a�ua�wc SER�.CES - ' 348T � 2 2"I ;� ¢f ,tir; v,x-vra+n u•.�, waa-r L.ar-r.,:. ao> •s..ti:. �-�r.l�_a axe n��'"'te ..r..a�no> i� 6 2 9�_ �4� ,.:tiorrr,+- :u-.,,.. a .. -,cr.. ¢ +- ,r IIII,_ 1. ON VERMONT arcr NO. DATE DESCRIPTION NO. .DATE DESCRIPTION NO. DATE DESCRIPTION - WILLIST2 rx 16 PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JUNE 1994 PAGE 12 7. Sketch plan application of L&M Partnership to make parking and access revisions to the recently approved 22,500 sq. ft. retail/indoor recreation/restaurant building (Bananas University), 7 Fayette Rd: Mr. Sheahan stepped down during this discussion due to a potential conflict of interest. Mr. Milot said people are not using parking which is not immediately visible, and they want to open parking at the south end of the building. He presented 2 alternatives ("a" and "b"), noting that the Fire Chief prefers "b". This plan would enlarge the entrance to the parking area. It would be signed and would also line up the two parking areas. Members felt this was acceptable. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m Clerk FITZPATRICK•LLEWELLYN INC( DRATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 0�11 OF TRANI ► WiTNA1L DATE ATTENTION RE: > WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via Viathe following items: ❑ Shop drawings f3, Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION r� U �1� L - �d`" - 11�1LI7a y �� S `C �t� 1.—+1*1 - t THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval, ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE — REMARKS ❑ Resubmit _copies for approval ❑ Submit ---copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO 40% Pre -Consumer Content •101 Post -Consumer Content SIGNED: V_'I PRODUCT 240 ina, cmron, mass.. olan. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Approved by resolution of the Planning Commission of The City of South Burlington, Vermont on the day of , 19T , subject to the require - rnents of said conditions of said resolution. Signed this day of , 19_, by Mairman or Clerk City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 25, 1994 Lance Llewellyn FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Revise Access to Bananas University, L&M Park Dear Mr. Llewellyn: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. If you have any questions, please give me a call. in erely J Weith, C ty Planner Encls JW / mcp cc: L&M Partnership M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, August 9, 1994 agenda items Date: July 25, 1994 JOHN LARKIN - RETAIL/OFFICE ADDITION - SITE PLAN --- provide square footage break down of office and retail space (including retail floor area) for proposed addition and existing building. --- show all lot dimensions. --- plan should show additional landscaping which meets the minimum $2,592 requirement, plan should have a planting schedule and plan should indicate existing landscaping and proposed landscaping. --- indicate location of nearest fire hydrant. --- provide existing and proposed overall coverage and front yard coverage along both Shelburne Road and Proctor Avenue. --- plan should indicate that easterly property boundary is boundary between R4 and Cl zoning districts. --- show the five (5) parking spaces located in front of the existing building. --- existing and proposed parking areas do not meet the minimum 24 foot parking aisle requirement. --- plan should show two (2) handicapped spaces. --- provide existing and proposed exterior lighting details and show locations on plan. All new lighting must be downcasting and shielded. --- plan should show a bike rack. --- sidewalk should be extended across front of property (requires permission from City of Burlington). --- plan does not meet the required 15 foot landscaped buffer strip between new parking area and easterly property- line (Section 19.104c of the zoning regulations). --- this application will not officially be placed on the August 9th agenda until the above comments are adequately addressed. L&M PARTNERSHIP - REVISE ACCESS - REVISED FINAL PLAT --- plans submitted are acceptable. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: August 9, 1994 agenda items Date: July 18, 1994 L&M PARK - SHELBURNE ROAD The latest revision to the site and utilities plans dated 7/12/94 prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc., are acceptable. 410 SHELBURNE STREET - CORNER SHELBURNE STREET & PROCTOR AVENUE 1. Plans must show method of draining the parking lot. 2. The Shelburne Street and Proctor Avenue curb openings should be closed. 3. The Shelburne Street frontage should have a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk. This is in the City of Burlington and will require a permit from them. .� �•�ncEs ntendent of Sch- Box 340, Morr' 05661-0340 any Publicly opened at time. LEGAL NOTICES The Morristown St District reserves the I to accept or reject AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION, and all bids. MONTPELIER, July 23, 24, 25, 1994. INVITATION FOR BIDlNOTICE OF ADOPTq Sealed bids, on forms ful TOWN OF WILLISTC nished by the State, M be received until 11:q On July 14, 1994, the a.m. prevailing time Friday, July 29, 1994, lectboard of the Towr Williston executed 133 State Street, Roo 319, Montpelier, VT f, a Stabilization Agreem with Williston Elder the construction of tf project hereinafter d Ho ing. Inc. The purpose the Agreement is to scribed. The time of r ceiving and opening bit eta lize the property taxes Williston Elder may be postponed due Housir Inc. for a period of five st seenrncies cond t ons.r unfor 1994 The n to 9 u y LOCATION. tl Agreement follows: Bolton IM 08 2(2 189, beginning in t Of Montpelier at 53.00 on both north and southbound and extending 18.45 north to MM 71,45 i ton on the north lane and extending miles north to Mfvt in Waterbury on southbound lane. CONSTRUCTION ING. Cold planing, bi nous concrete pave resurfacing, guard Pavement markings other related items. Plans and Bid Prop( may be seen and tained at the Agenc Transportation, Mon lier, VT and may be s at the office of J.E. We /J.E.R. Landry, Dlit Transportation Admirr< for #5 and #6, Coles ter and Berlin, Vennl Minimum wage ratesre determined by the Sre tary of Labor forth( project are set out !the advertised specificom and bid proposalsanc such rates are a p o1 the contract coverk the Project in accordancvith Section 115 of Feral - Aid Highway Act o1956. This contract is sut;t to the work hours t of 1962 PL 87-581 a im- plementing regulons. Contractors must rform this work under tl Fair Labor Standard, Act (Federal Wage-Ho(Law) as well as all otheippli- cable labor IawsMini- mum labor andtruck rates have been pieter- mined by the Staterans- portation Board a are set out in the Bidropo- sal. Contractors Ming on this project rst be qualified in accfance with Agency Reg,tions. The Vermont Agcy of Transportation hwy no- tifies all bidders tt it will affirmatively insuthat in any contract entid into ! Pursuant to this fertise- i ment. minority isiness I enterpnses wilUe at- r forded full oppanity to y submit bids in spon to 9 to this invitatiorind will s not be dlsminated It against on the gfunds of tt race, color; relbn, sex, a, or national ortg in Con- P sideration for award. vi The right is revved o se reject any or 1 bids, to 3, waive any foralty and st any and all tenticalities m, in bids and to aidpt such da `d as may be jarred in as tppe6i � 0); I TAX STABILIZATIO he C 'AGREEMENT lil THIS AGREEMENT mad boU "as of this 1st day of Jul, lao 1994 by and between tfi ms TOWN OF WILLISTOI n E- ("Town") and WILLISTOr bod ELDER HOUSING, INC., 1 1 n Vermont non roftt cor 6,7 Poration ("WET e WITNESSETH. WHEREAS, WEH is the owner of a 5.03-acre par. I- cel of land identified as t,i- Map Parcel No. 14-104-- Mt 119.000 on the Town of I, Williston tax maps; and d WHEREAS, WEH has developed on the Prop- erty a residential housing Is project for low and mod- )- erate income elderly oc- A cupants; and I- WHEREAS, WEH desires n property tax relief and stabilization; and t WHEREAS, WEH be- lieves it qualifies for such tax relief and stabilization under the provisions of 32 V.S.A. §3843; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authori set fourth in 32 V.S.A. § 3843 the Se- lectboard of the Town has ,apof and stabiliroved izatione elief for WEH as hereinafter provided. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mu- tual covenants herein contained, the parties agree as follows: 1. Stabilization. The Town shall annually as- I sess WEH Twelve Thou- t sand Dollars ($12,000.00) r for payments in lieu of t' real and personal prop- b arty taxes for five (5) suc- d cessive fiscal years, r, commencing July 1, 1994. 2- Adjustments. The 4 annual payment of A $12,000 is based on the tc 1994-95 combined Town tic and Williston School Dis- th trict tax rate for the first th dear of this Agreement. cc Should that tax rate in- da ;rease in any of the sub- is ;equent years of this lgreement the annual iayment shall be accord- SE igly increased. If a Town- JU ride reappraisal is imple- iented in any year of this greement, the annual ayment for that year Tic rail be adjusted so that e annual payment bears On e same ratio to the new lest isessd value of the I Will, 'OPerty as it did the pre- nan )us year to the old as- Ordi ssed value. of If Payments, Payments ceni ail be due in the same the Inner and on the same eithe es of each fiscal year tic I. ropertv taxes am c„e , . 1 Vermont Sd by IeIUIeSzfor PO the collection of delinquent real property delinquent VT WEH shall be responsible for paying the Town at .that all statutory collection fees should the Town utilize hool such collection proce- dUres. right 7• Representations any and Warranties. WEH represents and warrants to the Town th ttied o tie �,vardtofiSelami prior to Septectmen mber 12, 1994, require a vo on the question of dis., ,v- ing the Ordinance in annual or special wn meeting. If no petition is submitted within the re- quired timeframe, the Or- dinance shall become effective on September 12, 1994. the q at it meets _ qualifications for property Williston Selectmen Herb Goodrich, IN relief and Stabilization under under the Chair John Heins provisions of N 32 V.S.A. §3843, and that it will Carter Smith George Gerecke Con- tinue to do so durin th 3e- Virginia Lyons of term of this Agreement. e 8. Termination. July 23, 1994. ax nt This Agreement shall terminate PUBLIC HEARING Is- on June 30, 1999 or SOUTH BURLINGTON of bi sooner upon the occur- ence of any of the follow- PLANNING COMMISSION or ing: trransfersthe record title o all The South ommissiongwill Planning 1 e or a portion of the Prop- arty without the express hold a public hearing at the South Burlington written consent of the Se- lectboard of the Town. City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset V (b) In the event Street, South Burlin to C to use the PropH Tuesday,nAugustngnt19 s arty as required by par- at 7:30 P.M. to consid agraph 4 of this the following: j A reement. (C) The Vermont Legis lature Changes the base taxation in the state from the fair market value o property to another schen)e. (d) If the Property is alter- ed, changed or damaged to the extent that it would ordinarily be reappraised by the Town. Termination shall be ef- fective on July first of any fiscal year in which (a) or (b) occurs and shall be effective on July first fol- lowing the occurrence of c) or (d). 9. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall run with the Property and be bind- ing upon the successors and assigns of the par- ties. IN WITNESS WHERE- OF the parties have here- unto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. For information or ques- Revised final plat appl!c tion of L & M Partnershi m to amend an approve f planned commercial de velopment consisting o 150 residential units, a 6 room hotel, a 20,00 square foot movie theater (1,000 seats), a 22,50 square foot restaurant retail/ indoor recreation building, a 31500 square foot restaurant with drive - through service, and a bank with drive -through sevice, located on Shel- burne Road. The amend- ment consists of adding a second access to the un- derground parking facility. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission tions concerning the Ordi- nance, Bert Moffatt, Town July 23, 1994. Mane er of the Town of Williston, PUBLIC NOTICE mayy be con- 'acted at 722 Williston 3oad, Williston, Disadvantage Business Enterprise Vermont )5495; telephone number Overall Annual Goals For Fiscal Year 102-878-0919. 'ursuant to 32 V.S.A. October 1, 1994 through ,3844, five percent (5%) f the qualified voters of September 30, 1995 le Town of Williston iay, by petition submitted ) the Selectboard within verity (20) days of the ste of the Agreement, quest a vote on the )estion of disapproving e Tax Stabilization Ireement at a special wn meeting. If no peti- n is submitted within j required timeframe, I Agreement shall be_ me effective twenty (20) (S following the date of execution. WILLISTON LECTBOARD -Y 23, 1994. NOTICE OF ORDINANCE ADOPTION IWN OF WILLISTON July 14, 1994, the Se - )card of the Town of son adopted An Ordi- ;e to Amend Trafffic rtance. The purpose e Ordinance is to add iin intersections to ist of those at which r a stop sign or traf- ght shall be placed Pursuant to U.S. Depart merit of Transportatior regulations all State trans- ingrtatioDn agencies rtment Ceof Transportation financial assistance must establish overall percentage goals for the dollar value of work to be awarded dis- advantaged businesses. This action has been deemed necessary in or- der to provide these busi- nesses the maximum Opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcon- tracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds. The Vermont Agen- cy of Transportation is a recipient of U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation fi- nancial assistance and hereby proposes the fol- lowing goals in accord- ance with these regulations: Fiscal Year 1995 Overall Goal for Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Par- ticipation--FHWA, FAA, an FTA funded programs --Ina/ _ Vermont -Agency of JVthet to a Transportation J see ool July16 & 23, 1994. n its PREOSALSFORT94A COMPREHENSIVENGTI FEASIBILITY STUDY OF T TICE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RIVERFRONT DOWNTOWN, MIDDLEBURY The Town of Middlebury, Vermont has received an Economic Development Administration Grant to study the feasibility of developing the r verfront as a multi -use resource supporting economic de- velopment In downtown Middlebury. The area of study is below the fails on Otter Creek including the existing and potential commercial development Of the adjacent Marble - works and downtown properties. on The Town of Middlebury 94 is soliciting proposals and er qualifications from sional firms with expertese in planning, landscape ar- c hitecture and urban de- P sign. The selected fifth d shall have the capability to assemble a multi-disc(- 1f elinary team and conduct 0 process publicparticipation own committee to produce 0 three alternative concep- tual plans for a riverfront park, added downtown Parking and commercial development with recre- ational/ cultural amenities. The firm sh II in actib,.d South Burlington with Reggulations and Cho 117, Title 24, V.S.A. South Burlin ton Zor Board of Ad�usment hold a public hearing the South Burlington I nicipal Offices, Con'. ance Room, 575 Dor Street, South Burlingt Vbtmont on Monday, ) gust 8, 1994 at 7:00 P, idVOnsider the followinf ;1 A peal of Jere and Car( erole seeking a va al a from Section 19.1 Noh conformingg use sub4ection 19.003 exte sibh of the South Burlin, ton Zoning Regulation 9ddAquest is for permissic construct a 11, x 1; bothrom to ansifgle lam family dwelelingtih C ed within thirty two (3, rnet of the setback (15 feet), required from Lak. Champlain, located at 5, Bartlett Bay Road. I, Plans are on file with the South Burlington Planninc and Zoning Office, la Icated at City Hail, 575 Dorset Street, South Bur- lington, Vermont. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer each alternative withuaree July 23, 1994. spect to preliminary engi- nearing ABSOLUTELY FREE y costs, permit feasibility and public and AEG STORED ELEC- private cost/benefit. The firm shall include or sub- TRIC HEATERS 3 at 4 KW and 1 at 3 KW. 879- contract for professional 10356 weekday eves. engineering services in the areas of riverbank al- teration, ARE YOU LONELY? I ' have a lovable older fe- streamflow anal- y s i s, s t r u c t u r a l engineering, f male spayed black & White cat. Moving, can't historic and archeological tep. Good home only. preserva- tion and related permit 8 8-4174 or 864-4765. requirements. A preferred alternative plan will be se- COUCH A CHAIR Come take awayl lected by the Town and a 658-2436 ftnot report prepared to weekends or after 6, include presentation plans, preliminary DOVE 6 month old male, to engi- nearing and costs, and assessment a good home only. 482- 3522. Leave message of permit fee- sibility and w/dogs. marketability. Firms interested in sub- mitting a proposal should request a copy of the complete RFP by contact- ing the Town of Middle - Office orwn P anniingn Office at (802) 388-4041. on or after August 1, 1994. No proposals will be ac- cepted by firms who do not receive the RFP an- d/or do not follow the response format outlined in the RFP. All proposals must be received no later than 4:00 p.m. August 26, 1994. July 23, 1994 REQUEST FOR BIDS INTERIOR RENOVATIONS Williston Central School Williston, Vermont General Contractors are sought for interior renova- tions to the second floor Of the Williston Central School to be completed on or before August 26, 1994, The work involvuc 1hr FREE JUNK CAR REMOVAL Dan & Sons 893-3893 FREE ! Left over garage sale items. Books, baby I - Clothes, furniture, house- hold items etc. Anytime from - 1 at 50 So/24 Willard Si.4Bu, lington, VT 05401 TREE TV Oak console, color 25" TV, needs minor L( repair. Must pick up. al Crj1878-6889 ^ OST A pair of eye Si 'lasses, brown case at he Shelburne Museum's MI b) 3ig Apply Circus box of. Bt ice, Mon, 7/18, 862-8198 to SOFA BED ORANGE Fully functional. haired, n Come 8, get it! white pati 863-6024 c Maple Please C. PERSON. SPECIAL CAT needs special person with special home. Deciawed. A bundle kisses a -all 658-5401 cious bat Wt1UMING POOL ly mar 32 x i R fi ... . i rnunlo nr .7IIutb Nurlingtvn .dire Department 575 Vortiet —*trees South Nurlington, Vermont 05403 s., FAX: (802) 658-4748 (802) 658-7960 10: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Wallace Possich, Fire Chie# DATE: July 20, 1994 RE: Plans Review for August 9 Meeting The following plans have been reviewed and my comments are attached: 1. L&M Park Fayette Rd. Acceptable 2. 388-400 Shelburne Rd. ( Emerald City ) t Acceptable Project No. 88047 Dated 7-12-94 Dated July 18, 1994 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, August 9, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Revised final plat application of L&M Partnership to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 square foot movie theater (1,000 seats), a 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3,500 square foot restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive - through service, located on Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of adding a second access to the underground parking facility. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission July 23, 1994 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 18, 1994 Lance Llewellyn Fit zPatrick- Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Revise Parking Layout, L&M Park Dear Mr. Llewellyn: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the June 28, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. ly, JoWWeith, C' v Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: L&M Partnership FITZPATR I CK- LLEWELLYN INC('-'If RATED Engineering and Planning . ices One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 L[ETTL h OLI URRAZLIVLJT IJ YU DATE0. CV1 ATTENTION �j RE: �VVo, e-"t/c�, > WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via c.� the following items: ❑ Shop drawings )�_ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 7994 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval For your use As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections My v, w. tsurungton ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO CL � ao%fre-ConsumD: .0 er Content • to%Post-Consumer Content SIGNEC'J PROMU240-2 Ja Inc, cmma M= 01471- If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify u .1 once. 0 FITZPATR I C K- LLEWELLYN INC ?ORATED Engineering and Planning services One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO �2,n l ,-o; l %i�— LIFTIL IM OF'TRUnEMIL DAl'E -i • I • 1� 4- JOB NO. V 4--) ATTENTION' (' J RE: WE ARE SENDING YOU [_Attached ❑ Under separate cover via t _the following items: ❑ Shop drawings X Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION rj 34S I G t -b- o_� CL -U-h l -}, es 16, V, 1 4-`b 1 tl Y- 1"1 vcC-k'kC_+LC'Vq - `63v .a° S • 1994 CitV of So Rlirlona OR THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: xFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO a� t�,� 40 % Pre -Consumer Content • 10 % Post -Consumer Content SIGNED: PRODUCT240 �es Inc., Wan, Mass. 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant L&M Partnership 2) Name of Subdivision L&M Park 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application NONE 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: Add second entrance to Bananas University Underground parking 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulati ns for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) f r a subdivision. July 12, 1994 (Signat re) app icant or contact person Date City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 6, 1994 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Revise Building Elevations, 7 Fayette Road Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on June 14, 1994. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, r Joe WeithPld City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 6, 1994 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Revise Building Elevations, 7 Fayette Road Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the June 14, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith, X19d City Planner 1 Encl JW / mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 14 JUNE 1994 PAGE 2 Mr. Sheahan stepped down during this application due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Rabideau identified the L-shaped building on the plan, noting that it has 3 separate users. The amendment addresses a change in the elevation dimension. The facade will be broken with gables. All are below the 35 ft. limit. The exterior of the building is stucco with tile banding with the look of stone. Mr. Austin asked whether the rooftop apparatus will be visible. Mr. Rabideau said it will be from a distance but not from the residences in the back due to the change in elevation. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final Plat application of Gregg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units a 61 room hotel 20,000 sq. ft. movie theater (1000 seats) a 22,500 sa ft. restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building a 3,500 sq ft. restaurant with drive -through service and a bank with drive - through service. The amendment consists of revising the approved building elevations of the proposed 22,500 sq ft restaurant retail/ indoor recreation building as depicted on a two page set of Plans, page 1 entitled "Bananas University Plaza L&M Park subdi- vision, 1885 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," Prepared by Gregory Rabideau Architect dated 3/25194 with a last revision date of 5/31/94 with the following stipulations 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect 2. Any change to these approved Plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission Ms. Peacock seconded. The motion Passed unanimously. Mr. Sheahan rejoined the Commission. 4. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application of Dorset Land Company to amend a previously approved planned commercial development consisting of 156,000 sq. ft. of medical office, general office, cafe/deli, and retail use in 5 buildings on 11.64 acres of land, 421 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing 88,740 sq. ft. of medical and general office use and a 124 unit nursing/convalescent home in 3 buildings on 11.64 acres. Mr. Austin stepped down during this review due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Brush showed the approved site plan. They have a conditional use permit from the Zoning Board for the nursing home. The PLANNING COMMISSION 14 JUNE 1994 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 14 June 1994, at 7:30 pm, in the conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; David Austin, Catherine Peacock, Mac Teeson, Terrence Sheahan Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Eve Thorsen, Free Press; Greg Rabideau, Barbara Pell, Mildred Estey, Madeline Yandow, David Kirschtel, Joseph & Rita Randazzo, Gretchen & Vern Wamsganz, Charles Brush, John Giebink, Kit Tillinghast, Paul Nestork, David LaRose, Bob Audette, Karen Pettersen 1. Other Business: Mr. Burgess noted that he and another member of the Commission have a conflict of interest in the Goodrich item on the agenda for this meeting. That will not leave a majority of the Commission to make a decision on the application. The Commission, therefore, asks to postpone the item with apologies to the applicant. Mr. Burgess further noted that the City Council has not replaced two members who have resigned from the Commission. Mr. Austin moved to postpone the public hearing on the Green Acres application until 28 June Ms Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Minutes of 24 May and 31 May: Mr. Austin noted a correction in the spelling of Mr. Simoneau's name in the Minutes of 24 May. Ms. Peacock moved to approve the Minutes of 24 May as amended. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Sheahan moved to approve the Minutes of 31 May as written. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Public Hearing: Revised Final Plat application of Greg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, 20,000 sq. ft. movie theatre (1000 seats), a 22,500 sq. ft. restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3500 sq. ft. restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of revising the approved building elevations of the proposed 22,500 sq. ft. restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building: M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: June 28, 1994 agenda items Date: May 26, 1994 TWIN OAKS - KIDS FITNESS - JOY DRIVE 1. Drainage inlet in front drive should be shown on the plan. This inlet or the pavement around it should be leveled because it is to high to intercept the runoff. 2. Curb cuts are depressed curbs. They should be shown on the plans. 3. Plan dated 5/24/94 is acceptable. DAVE'S AUTOMOTIVE - GREGORY DRIVE - LOT #4 I. The water service was not installed as plan dated May 14, 1993 with latest revision dated May 26, 1994 shows. It was installed from the lot to the west which is owned by Bob Willis. A 10 foot easement to Dave's Automotive should be secured. 2. The concrete sidewalk and the landscaping has yet to be installed, also the wood retaining wall along the west side. 3. If the plan topography is correct, the mound along the westerly boundary is about 10 feet on to the adjacent Willis property. If this is correct, an easement should be secured. THOMPSON TRAVEL, INC. - PATCHEN ROAD - WHITE STREET Plan calls for relocating storm drain. It does not appear that this is necessary, it may only require adjustment. L&M PARK (SKETCH PLAN "A") BANANAS UNIVERSITY - SHELBURNE ROAD Driveway entrance curbing shall not be constructed across sidewalks but shall be constructed as shown for the McDonald's entrance. 1 1 \ I \� i / / / I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I / I I / I I / I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I l I I I li I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I1. I 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 I I iIIII 1 I I III I I I III I I I / / 1 / 1 ' I I � 1 / i � I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I NR FARR,)_LL U MACINT09H AVE. 1 41A, SITE NOTES _ I. OWNER OF RECORD, GERA.D MILOT 4 JOHN LAWN PA. BOX 4W BURLINGTON, VEW04T 08402 7. CO -APPLICANT, CREGG BELDOCK cdror. BANANAS UNIVERSITY SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 08403 3. BUILDING, PARKING LOT LAYOUT FOR THE THEATER BANK 4 RESTAURANTAND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM A PLAN PREPARED BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED ENTILED 'L 4 M PARK SITE 4 UTILITIES PLAN' DATED JIVE 1930, LAST REVISION T-19-93, AND 8HOULD NOT BE INTERPETED AS AN AS -BUILT DRAWING, RECEIVED , A 2 2 1994 City of So. Burlington GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET) _—- 1 Inch . 40 it N/F FARRELL ADD UTILITIES, WDEf F01➢1D AND �iAGKED PARKIMi WITe, HMIDIDAPNED BPACEB, MID 71 JUNE 1994 FAT lU. VI N T Awl GIN NT 2 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE h1p U �0 0 SITE NOTES I. OWNER OF RECORD. GERALD MILOT 4 JOHN LAWN P.O. BOX 41%3 BURLNGTON, VEW1ONT 054M 7. CO -APPLICANT, GREGG BELDOCK dhM/a BANANAS UNIVERSITY SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 3. BUILDNG, PAWNG LOT LAYOUT FOR THE THEATER BANK 4 RESTAURANT AND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM A PLAN PREPARED BY FITZPATRIOK-LLEUELLYN INCORPORATED ENTILED 'L 4 M PARK SITE 4 UTILITIES PLAN' DATED JUNE 1990, LAST REVISION 1-19-93, AND SHOULD NOT BE INTERPETED AS AN AS -BUILT DRAWING. RtCEIVED A z z 1994 City of So. Burlington GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) I inch - 40 It. L & M PARK � I T. M1 114TpJ SKETCH PLAN (5) - WEST PAWING LOT = BANANAS UNIVERSITY ------ (M4N e INCORPORATED !JR ewueewln dm rwae.n eelavlcee D-49W WILLISTON VERMONT PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 June 24, 1994 Lance Llewellyn FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Revise Parking Layout, L&M Park Dear Mr. Llewellyn: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 28, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, JW/mcp Encls cc: L&M Partnership please give me a call. S4erely, J, City Planner Memorandum - Planning June 28, 1994 agenda items June 25, 1994 Page 6 fixture should be rotated downward to create a downcasting fixture). --- one (1) building mounted 150 watt lamp at east entry ( this fixture should be replaced with a shielded fixture). --- one (1) ground mounted fixture with a 700 watt lamp at west entry. 7) L&M PARTNERSHIP - REVISE PARKING LAYOUT - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of parking and access revisions to the recently approved . 22,500 square foot retail/indoor recreation/restaurant building (Bananas University). The last review of this site by the Planning Commission was on 6/14/94 (minutes enclosed). The applicant has submitted two (2) different sketches for the Commission's consideration. Access/circulation: The approved plan has two (2) curb cuts on the north side of Fayette Road. The easterly curb cut serves Mcdonald's, the bank and Bananas University. The westerly curb cut serves Bananas University. Sketch plan "A" adds one (1) additional curb cut to serve an ingress only driveway to the underground parking. This curb cut is located across from the theater access drive. The westerly curb cut is relocated approximately 280 feet to the north. Sketch plan "B" maintains the same number of curb cuts but widens the westerly curb cut from 24 feet to 60 feet. The widened access drive allows for an ingress only driveway to the underground parking area. Parking: Sketch plan "A" decreases the number of parking spaces by two (2) spaces and plan "B" results in no change in the number of parking spaces. Coverage: Coverage information should be submitted for final plat. Landscaping: A revised landscaping plan should be submitted for final plat. C City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 13, 1994 John Larkin Larkin Milot Partnership 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Violation, 7 Fayette Road Dear Mr. Larkin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that you are in violation of Section 20.10, Zoning Permits, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Your violation consists of commencing land development without a zoning permit. A building is under construction on your property located at 7 Fayette Road and no zoning permit has been issued for this construction. Pursuant to 24 VSA 4444, you have seven (7) days in which to cure this violation or be subject to legal action and fines of up to $50 per day for each day the violation continues. You are not entitled to an additional warning notice for a violation occurring after the seven (7) days. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sin ely, 9 Raym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Richard Ward Dianne Kenney, Esquire Gregg Beldock Certified Letter #P 280 219 019 STI, POST TOP IMPACT RESISTANT LUMINAIRES I Diffuser: Clear Polycarbonate (CPC) eD Finish: Black um I Material: Aluminum 1 — Voltage: 120V i _ Ballast: NPF cC mav:: -K.C? 51-01 LAMP LUMEN A B C$ 8620 1 22W Circline 1050 11 9 3/4 11 8621 2 13W PL 1800 11 9 3/4 11 8622 2 26W PLC 3600 11 9 3/4 11 8623 1 70W E-17 HPS 5670 11 9 3/4 11 8624 1 100W E-17 HPS 8550 11 9 3/4 11 8625 1 100W E-17 MV 3600 11 9 3/4 11 —c--- - A --i POST TOP IMPACT RESISTANT LUMINAIRES Diffuser: Clear Polycarbonate (CPC) Y�Iuihl�W�llll�i� 1 II�I�eul '�� Finish: Black (BL) Material: Aluminum Voltage: 120V Ballast: NPF LAMP LUMEN A B C 8630 1 22W Circline 1050 11 8 11 3/4 8631 2 13W PL 1800 11 8 11 3/4 8632 2 26W PLC 3600 11 8 11 3/4 8633 1 70W E-17 HPS 5670 11 8 11 3/4 8634 1 100W E-17 HPS 8550 11 8 11 3/4 8635 1 100W E-17 MV 3600 11 8 11 3/4 A_ POST TOP IMPACT RESISTANT LUMINAIRES Diffuser: White Polycarbonate (WPC) Finish: Black (BL) Material: Aluminum Voltage: 120V e Ballast: NPF LAMP LUMEN A B 8610 2 13W PL 1800 8 23 8611 2 26W PLC 3600 8 23 8612 1 70W E-17 HPS 5670 8 23 8613 1 100W E-17 HPS 8550 8 23 8614 1 100W E-17 MV 3600 8 23 ORDERING INFORMATION: Order as a complete unit, i e., 8622 CPC BL 120V OPTIONS: 277 Volt Ballast: Add 277V High Power Factor: Add Suffix HPF Custom Finish: Consult Factory SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS DABBCO LIGHTING 5983 SMITHWAY COMMERCE, CA 90040 TEL: (213) 722-0080 FAX: (213) 724-1249 PLAN 11 42 LAMP RECESSED LUMINAIRE WITH CAST ALUMINUM LOUVERS AND CLEAR SAFETY GLASS. STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE FOR MAXIMUM CORROSION RESISTANCE IS SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS. THROUGH WIRING, MAXIMUM OF FOUR (4) NO. 12 AWG CONDUCTORS SUITABLE FOR 75°C. Diffuser: Clear Safety Glass (CSG) Finish: Black (BL), White (WH) or Bronze (BRZ) Material: Cast Aluminum Voltage: 120V Ballast: NPF Opening: 11 1/4 x 3 7/8 x 3 1/4 LUMEN A B C 8705 1 18W PLC 1250 12 3/8 5 1/8 4 1/8 OPTIONAL SOFT RADIUS TRIM - SPECIFY (S . EXAMPLE: 8705 CSG BL 120V SR - (jam C�cl.s ic.*a:f (K1Gi{ RECESSED LUMINAIRE WITH WHITE SAFETY GLASS. STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE FOR MAXIMUM CORROSION RESISTANCE IS SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS. THROUGH WIRING, MAXIMUM OF FOUR (4) NO. 12 AWG CONDUCTORS SUITABLE FOR 75' C. Diffuser: White Safety Glass (WSG) Finish: Black (BL), White (WH) or Bronze (BRZ) Material: Cast Aluminum Voltage: 120V Ballast: NPF Opening: 11 1/4 x 3 7/8 x 3 1/4 LAMP LUMEN A B C 8720 1 18W PLC 1250 12 3/8 5 1/8 4 1/8 ORDERING INFORMATION: Order as a complete unit, i.e., 8705 CSG BL 120V OPTIONS: 277 Volt Ballast: Add 277V High Power Factor: Add Suffix HPF Tamper Proof Screws: Add Suffix TS Custom Finish: Consult Factory Soft Radius Trim: Add SR 48 SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS DABBCO LIGHTING 5983 SMITHWAY COMMERCE, CA 90040 TEL: (213) 722-0080 FAX: (213) 724-1249 R i. A WALL OR CEILING MOUNTED ACRYLIC LUMM. —)ES Diffuser: White Acrylic (WA) Finish: Black (BL) or White (WH) Material Steel Voltage: 120V Ballast: NPF LAMP LUMEN A B 1710 1 22W Circline 1050 11 5 1711 1 13W PL 900 11 5 1712 2 13W PL 1800 11 5 1713 1 32W Circline 1800 14 5 1714 1 22W & 32W Circline 2850 14 5 1715 2 13W PL 1800 14 5 i. 1716 2 26W PLC 3600 14 5 1717 1 32W Circline 1800 19 5�� ' r�psxt 1718 1 40W Circline 2500 19 5�� 1719 1 32W & 40W Circline 4300 19 5 .. 1720 2 26W PLC 3600 19 5 I B- ---- A— WALL OR CEILING MOUNTED IMPACT RESISTANT LUMINAIRES l Diffuser: White Polycarbonate (WPC) C Finish: Black (BL) or White (WH) Material: Steel Voltage: kT Ballast: NPF NPF LAMP LUMEN A B 1721 1 22W Circline 1050 11 5 1722 1 13W PL 900 11 5 1723 2 13W PL 1800 11 5 1724 1 32W Circline 1800 14 5 1725 1 22W & 32W Circline 2850 14 5 1726 2 13W PL 1800 14 5� 1727 2 26W PLC 3600 14 5k; 1728 1 32W Circline 1800 19 5 1729 1 40W Circline 2500 19 5 1730 1 32W & 40W Circline 4300 19 5 1731 2 26W PLC 3600 19 5 CEILING MOUNTED CLEAR CRYSTAL GLASS LUMINAIRES Diffuser: Clear Crystal Glass (CCG) �? Finish: Gold (GLD) r Material: Steel k Voltage: 120V Ballast: NPF M LAMP LUMEN A B 1040 1 22W Circline 1050 10 1/2 3 112 1041 1 13W PL 900 10 1/2 3 1/2 l ;a 1042 2 13W PL 1800 10 112 3 1/2 ° 1043 2 26W PLC 3600 10 1/2 3 112 1340 1 32W Circline 1800 16 5 i 1341 1 22W & 32W Circline 2850 16 5�`ro n}� 1342 2 26W PLC 3600 16 5 r ORDERING INFORMATION: Order as a complete unit, i.e.. 1715 WA BL 120V TS OPTIONS: mo 277 Volt Ballast: Add 277V IV High Power Factor: Add Suffix HPF Tamper Proof Screws: Add Suffix TS Damp Location Listing: Add Suffix DL Custom Finish: Consult Factory DABBCO LIGHTING 5983 SMITHWAY COMMERCE, CA 90040 TEL: (213) 722-0080 FAX: (213) 724-1249 35 WALL MOUNTED LUMINAIRES WITH ALUMINUM HALF LID AND GUARD Diffuser: White Acrylic (WA) _ _ e Finish: Black (BL) or White (WH) Material: Aluminum;,x;;; Voltage: 120V Ballast: NPF id 7 M yap rjav PCM4, LAMP LUMEN A B C 4050 1 9W PL 600 10 1 /4 10 1 /4 7 1 /2 4051 2 9W PL 1200 10 1/4 10 1/4 7 1/2 4052 1 22W PLC 1200 10 1 /4 10 1 /4 7 1 /2 4053 2 22W PLC 2400 10 1 /4 10 1 /4 7 1 /2 A —.--7 WALL OR CEILING MOUNTED LUMINAIRES Diffuser: White Acrylic (WA) i Finish: White (WH) or Black (BL) Material: Aluminum Voltage: 120V Ballast: NPF t_AMP LUMEN A B C 4055 1 9W PL 600 10 1/4 10 1/4 6 4056 2 9W PL 1200 10 1/4 10 1/4 6 4057 1 22W PLC 1200 10 1/4 10 1/4 6 4058 2 22W PLC 2400 10 1/4 10 1/4 6 A __ _� WALL OR CEILING MOUNTED LUMINAIRES WITH I'- o _}_ ALUMINUM GUARD Diffuser: White Acrylic (WA) Finish: Black (BL) or White (WH) -_) 8 I�Illj Material: Aluminum / Voltage: 120V Ballast: NPF 0A W W� Lm C67 C-4At6k� LAMP LUMEN A B C 4065 1 9W PL 600 10 1/4 10 1/4 7 1/2 4066 2 9W PL 1200 10 1/4 10 1/4 7 112 4067 1 22W PLC 1200 10 1 /4 10 1 /4 7 1 /2 4068 2 22W PLC 2400 10 1 /4 10 1 /4 7 1 /2 ORDERING INFORMATION: Order as a complete unit, i.e., 4050 WA BL 120V OPTIONS: 277Volt Ballast: Add 277V High Power Factor: Add Suffix HPF Tamper Proof Screws: Add Suffix iS Custom Finish: Consult Factory SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS DABBCO LIGHTING 5983 SMITHWAY COMMERCE, CA 90040 TEL: (213) 722-0080 FAX: (213) 724-1249 11 40 Memorandum - May 24, 1994 May 20, 1994 Page 2 Planning agenda items Sewer: No additional sewer allocation needed. Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which allows this property to generate 16.3 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The existing use is estimated to generated 6 vte's and with the increase in size to generate 7.5 vte's for a 1.5 vte increase. The applicant will be required to contribute $216 to the Williston Road Traffic Impact Fund - Area 2 for the 1.5 additional vte's to be generated by this project. Lighting: Existing exterior lighting consists of the following: --- one (1) 100 watt pole mounted incandescent lamp in the front yard. --- one (1) 60 watt building mounted entry light. --- five (5) 150 watt building mounted incandescent flood lights. No additional lighting proposed. 3) GREGG BELDOCK - REVISED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - SKETCH PLAN This application is to revise a condition of the 3/3/92 L&M Park amendment (minutes enclosed) approving certain building elevations/design for the retail building. Applicant proposes to alter the building elevations/design of the building approved on 2/2/94 (minutes enclosed) including exterior appearance. Applicant has submitted an elevation of the building from Shelburne Road. Elevations for the remaining three (3) sides should also be submitted. This information is needed to confirm compliance with height regulations. 4) NET RESULT - DORSET STREET MEDIAN BREAK Eric Flegenheimer of the Net Result met with the Council to present a plan to allow a break in the median in front of the Net Result property which would allow access to a planned roadway over his property. The roadway would connect through to San Remo Drive (see enclosed plan). The Council suggested the plan be reviewed by the Planning Commission for comments/recommendations. A copy of Chuck Hafter's memo to the Council is enclosed. Also enclosed is a 2 PLANNER 658-7955 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 05482 May 20, 1994 Re: Revise Building Elevations, 7 Fayette Road Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, May 24, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, JW/mcp Encls cc: Brendan Kelley please give me a call. S erely, Jo Weith, Cit IPlanner — — 1----- - — - - — - — - — I g I g i ----- --*-------------� i i o — i GREGORY RABIDEAU, ARCHITECT, BANANAS UNIVERSITY PLAZA � 86 LAKE STREET LAND M PARK �va®,r,snw� esrcsx� ocrs rno®. ooa - -arse s rno® _-.- _- _--___ -- -.____ 10 0 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 1185 SHELBURNE ROAD - --- -- - A (802) 863-0222 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT v N > GREGORY RABIDEAU, ARCHITECT w 86 LAKE STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 863-0222 MEM921 OF THB ANSIICAN IROITUTI OF ARCHIUCTS We] WN 0 o -- O e -- O O -- (D wal U BANANAS UNIVERSITY PLAZA -EVM �6/gpkn 82VATMuroar,"ME)MMFWsra,, MDpeaaa L & M PARK SUBDIVISION — 1185 SHBLBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMON City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 20, 1994 Larkin Milot Partnership P.O. Box 4193 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Zoning Violation, 7 Fayette Road Gentlemen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that you are in violation of Section 20.10, Zoning Permits, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Your violation consists of commencing land development without a zoning permit. A building is under construction on your property located at 7 Fayette Road and no zoning permit has been issued for this construction. Pursuant to 24 VSA 4444, you have seven (7) days in which to cure this violation or be subject to legal action and fines of up to $50 per day for each day the violation continues. You are not entitled to an additional warning notice for a violation occurring after the seven (7) days. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc ely, AJJ Ray and J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Richard Ward Dianne Kenney, Esquire Gregg Beldock Certified Letter #P280 219 018 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INC*- ORATED Engineering and Planning Juices One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO 04 /V I k Vj"-fT\. > WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings )( Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ [LIECTCU.0 OF URUISONOTTM DATE JOB NO, oCo4 ATTENTION RE the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION °l lCt KE Y t v.w rrt.f-wcf, E -,2 p1 'A V (u c.,h V" tom= r THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted > ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS 1% L. %0 La V L. L! ❑ Resubmit copies fore 4o?ai1994 ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return cord QfirSP. Burlington ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US ,2 ( A4/1 5 h In (IV I d ( V_\ rA UA a - /,` [ t V- Z-Af i.5 I �5 COPY TO 4 40 / Pre -Consumer Content - 10 / Post -Consumer Content SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-2 Ees Inc., Groton, Mm. 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 21, 1994 Lance Llewellyn Fit zPatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Revise Parking Layout, L&M Park Dear Mr. Llewellyn: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski will be forwarded as soon as they are available. Please respond to these comments with revised plans as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please give me a call. iSin rely, cam-- aymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB /mcp STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 660-2555 (VOICEITDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 OF COUNSEL PATTI R. PAGE- ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHE:R DIANNE L. KENNEY (*ALSO ADMIWED IN N.Y.) June 23, 1994 Ms. Diane A. Lavallee, Clerk Chittenden Superior Court PO Box 187 Burlington, VT 05402-0187 Re: City of South Burlington v. James J. Fayette, John P. Larkin and Gerald C. Milot, d/b/a Larkin Milot Partnership and Gregg Beldock Dear Diane: Enclosed please find a.Complaint, a proposed Order for Hearing and a check in the amount of $85 for the filing fee in the above -entitled matter. Very truly yours, A �' ZSteven F.zel SFS/mld Enclosure SON1438.cor STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, ) Plaintiff, ) V. ) JAMES J. FAYETTE, JOHN P. ) LARKIN and GERALD C. MILOT, ) d/b/a LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP) and GREGG BELDOCK, ) Defendants. ) CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT Docket No. COMPLAINT NOW COMES the City of South Burlington, by and through its attorneys, Stitzel & Page, P.C., and for its Complaint states the following: 1. The City of South Burlington is a Vermont municipality located in Chittenden County. 2. At all times relevant to this proceeding, the City of South Burlington has had zoning regulations in effect that regulate land development in the City of South Burlington. 3. The Larkin Milot Partnership is the record owner of certain property located in the City of South Burlington westerly of Shelburne Road, so-called. 4. On information and belief, Gregg Beldock has or will lease a portion of the property owned by the Larkin Milot Partnership for the purpose of constructing a 22,500 square foot building for recreational, retail and restaurant use on such property. iWrZEL & PAGr, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 eAWERY STREET IURLIN(v PON. VMRMONT 05,101 5. In May of 1994, Gregg Beldock commenced construction of the above -described building without first obtaining a zoning permit as required by the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations. 6. By commencing construction of the above -described building without obtaining a zoning permit, defendants have violated and are continuing to violate the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations. 7. By letter dated June 13, 1994, (copy attached as Exhibit A) the above -named defendants were provided notice of the above -described violation of the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations. 8. Despite said notice, Defendants have continued construction of said building and, on information and belief, will continue such activity until enjoined by court order. WHEREFORE, the City of South Burlington requests that the Court grant the following relief: 1. Enter a preliminary injunction enjoining any further construction activity on the subject property without first obtaining the zoning permit required under the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations. 2. Enter a permanent injunction enjoining any further construction activity on the subject property and requiring removal of all improvements constructed without benefit of the zoning permit required under the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations. PITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW - 2 - 171 6ATITRY STREET ORI.WGTON, VERMONT 05401 3. Award the City fines of $50.00 per day for the period June 20, 1994 and continuing until the Defendants obtain the zoning permit required under the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations or remove all improvements constructed on the subject property. DATED at Burlington, Vermont, this 23rd day of June, 1994. STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. Attorneys for City of South Burlington By:.A, J _ Steven F. Stitze SON175.lit i,ri,m , & PAGE, P.C. AWORNEYS AT LAW - 3 - 171 IWITERY STREET IURW NGTON, VERMONT 05401 STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, ) Plaintiff, ) V. ) JAMES J. FAYETTE, JOHN P. ) LARKIN and GERALD C. MILOT, ) d/b/a LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP) and GREGG BELDOCK, ) Defendants. ) CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT Docket No. ORDER FOR HEARING Upon the City of South Burlington's request for Preliminary Injunction set forth in its Complaint dated June 23, 1994, IT IS ORDERED that the Larkin Milot Partnership and Gregg Beldock show cause before this Court on the day of , 1994, at o'clock in the noon, or as soon thereafter as they may be heard why this Court should not enter the preliminary injunction requested by the City. Dated at Burlington, in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, this SON179.lit day of June, 1994. Superior Court Clerk JUN 22 '94 14:15 CITY OF S BURLINGTON P.1/5 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 65&7955 June 13, 1994 John Larkin Larkin Milot Partnership 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Violation, 7 .Fayette Road Dear Mr. Larkin: ZONING ADMINISTRA70R 65&7958 Please be advised that you are in violation of Section 20.10, Zoning Permits, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Your violation consists of commencing land development without a zoning permit. A building is under construction on your property located at 7 Fayette Road and no zoning permit has been issued for this construction. Pursuant to 24 VSA 4444, you have seven (7) days in which to cure this violation or be subject to legal action and fines of up to $50 per day for each day the violation continues. You are not entitled to an additional warning notice for a violation occurring after the seven (7) days. If you have any questions, please let me know. RJB/mcp cc: Richard ward Dianne Kenney, Esquire Gregg Beldock Certified Letter #P 200 219 019 Sing1rely, Q 6_4'� v Raym nd J. Delair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Post -It, brand fax transmittal memo 7671 1 1 or pages ► Dept. phone Y Fax N Fax N EXHIBIT Preliminary Memo - Preliminary June 28, 1994 agenda items June 20, 1994 Page 2 Patchen Road (existing and proposed). --- the correct zoning districts are Residential 4 and Commercial 1, this should be noted on the plan. --- provide cut sheets for exterior lighting fixtures. --- parking aisle between double row of parking must be 24 feet wide. --- location of zoning boundary line is not correct, the boundary line intersects the property line where the property line along White Street intersects with the property line along Patchen Road. --- 17 parking spaces required and only 11 spaces are being provided. --- if a dumpster will be used, it must be shown and be adequately screened. --- the Traffic Overlay District limits this property to 15.1 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. I.T.E. estimates the proposed use to generate 17.8 vte's or 2.7 vte's more than is permitted. Under Section 17.50 of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if it determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. It does not appear that any site improvements are proposed which would produce a net benefit for traffic flow. --- proposed addition does not meet front and side yard setback requirements. --- a bicycle parking facility should be provided. L&M PARTNERSHIP - REVISE PARKING LAYOUT - SKETCH PLAN --- sketch plans should include type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed utilities. --- plans should show parking spaces under building and exterior stacking units. --- all handicapped spaces should be shown. --- plans should show limits of Fayette Road r.o.w. --- applicant should look into aligning the one-way access drive across from the theater driveway. 2 .7uutb +'Surltngtun Ntre Department 575 19nrset street 3uutb Nurlington, Uermnnt 05403 1 FAX: (802) 658-4748 (802) 658-7960 TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: W. Possich, Fire Chief V� RE: Plans Review for June 28 Meeting DATE: June 9, 1994 The following site plans have been reviewed and my comments are attached: 1. Car Buff $ Dave's Autunotive Gregory Dr. Job No. 93111 Dated 6-1-94 At least.one hydrant needs to be located within 300 ft. of building. Otherwise, acceptable. 2. Twin Oaks Kids and Fitness Farrell St. Acceptable 3. BRT, Inc. 125 St. Paul St. Acceptable 4. L & M Park West Parking Lot Dated 5-1-94 Dated 6-13-94 Project No. 93064 Dated 6-16-94 Either plan is acceptable but Plan " B " is preferred due to easier and quicker access by fire apparatus to rear of building. ouuuivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a • Owner of record � 5 � � �dT�1 F0c,� b. Applicant (_ I�/(��(; �.1 p c . Contact►` 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties _F PrL k) I C)o 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. 1.16-C AF P 12ev xouc-) hP)UrA ILkI(5 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 13!E1C. ea ( "C' UTt ht Z i ES 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8 1/2 x 11, 8 1/2 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the follow- ing information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belong- ing to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines} type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. 4) Type of location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed to adjacent property and surrounding area. I�hv k (Signa re) applicant or contact person subdivision t L' - � 4- Date 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 17, 1994 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Revise Building Elevations, 7 Fayette Road Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the May 24, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sc rely, C J e Weith, ity Planner 1 Encl JW / mcp 4 CITY OF SOUTH BURLTNGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record b• Applicant c. Contact 2) purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. (2 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, such y, etc. rh,,II ur��" 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sower, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.- 7 ) Describe any prev.iollz actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: l 8) Submit five copies and cne reduced copy (© 1./2 x 11, a 1/2 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the .follow- ing information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties_ 2l Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belong- ing to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. 43 Type of location, and approximate size of existing and Proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, trIle north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. do (Siena re) applicant or contact person Date C:\KA0\GNG\93064\4917SNH1 Thu Jun 16 IS: W 12 1994 SIM 200 — — — SHEL15URNE ROAD (ROUTE 7) m e a a Cn Z m VQ z O m r C.\ACAD\DWG\93064\4916SKH1 Thu Jun 16 15AR. 26 1994 sU F''� ------------ 6uEL5UFNIE ROAD (ROUTE 1) o Q z 0 m UN UN m FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCP"OORATED Engineering and Planning ices One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 > WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ LETT Oi TRANSMITTAL DATE I U JOB NO. ATTENTION O� RE: V /L v4v- following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications �1 ♦ art � . rt / �. � � � WMS, • 1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: (('����t}��� nn IALAQ' B Q}} oll �rl�n essubmit xFor approval ❑ Approved !r5'�s copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO I 4 40% Pre -Consumer Content -10% Post -Consumer Content SIGNED:_ PRODUCT 240-2� Inc., Groton, Mass 01471 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us . 4c y ♦ nliadin(tili[F[f-T inl d"Min[it m t i / I8>s / ..� nnnnme�[itunmm[nnntune[mnnnn[nininturutnnunru![mm�[u[nntn[ri � , ! t+ 'gyp � t r�' a' �xn Q \ C 1 \ , 1 i 1 -so a J ! \ \ tJ 5' f:: •. :::::..:.:.::?•:•: .............. \ ■ _ _ -3O D LIItIIIt[t[il[n :.,,;;;;•:•,;�'..:,;a;;;;;';����+,� 1 , T. /44/ `'�1D:_ -✓"""_ _ .., /� /l ram, /f, / _ 91® � 471 ✓ip 0 I� r ♦: •,,,� w„�„ ,.s M1 � /' tJ % ' J f r:;},"`Lv,'�'�{':r ';}l{,+J+.• '. '•ram'-^•-..'" ': r �/ .."A. ,\'��it�?}�' ,va•{�,�:• � 1 to . / I o . ;•}:;:'. "� -r���~ti44j' y -fie • .�•..� � ,ti h: •' ,� r " ., r": • � � � \ �( 4 hr, f.^}'vL'�JS��yn1••.+,� t tt '+ j( �4 1 ' is �: ... ::: - •}i:•: ;:.;•-:::.v; :.� oe 6,11 vi fg t } ♦ J .t• p .d 4 fJ i :r � L{• k . , `r ....a.u,''t,L.�.,u.�'s;�•_ks.. / .. ,........................... .. , . ,. .. .. u%#;??,�P�ati .. �•h• ... ,+�.._ ���; ,2_:, K:1 :.;:r'R ' '' 111 'S `•.0 \ J % \ � as • 3`� � � I + � + f U_/' ; �' ti ' // 4 I i�::>:.L :a, ► f i 1 1 l J 1 1 t 1' ,\ �\ . .\ .�\�\ zL 02 > V 1 'gis i-y t -- t \ - - O �I 0 f L-4 f: it c — r l :f: s Ni- -n ` _� � CP) I 7 /,� • :. /�.t,--.1.:<:;.i <;:v:E:�>:.�: ,"f> i :�:��: I p-Di o / 1 �� % � n m S L110 li, C- 7- plop � 011-110-L Co t4 c4s 7, ��iIIII� No Text PLANNING COMMISSION 24 May 1994 page 2 nonconforminq use. _ The applicant is �ro�osing to_ extend a non- conforming use by-350 sg.__ft. 2. The application does _not comply with_Sec_tion_ 19.254(b) of the z_oning_reculations_. Section 19.254(b) requires a commercial access drive connectinoparking areastoa�public_ street to be a minimum of 20 feet in width_ . _ The ap_p_licant is proposinq an access drive width of only 9 feet at its narrowest point. Ms. Peacock seconded the motion which th�tenWcassed unanimously. 3. Sketch plan application of Gregg Beldock to amend the approved building elevation of a proposed 22,500 sq. ft. building for retail indoor recreation and restaurant use, L&M Park, Shelburne Road: Mr. Beldock explained the building is being constructed now and they have an option to purchase the property if it is broken out of the PUD. After site plan approval, John Larkin expressed interest in having the building be 2 stories of a grey wood clap- board construction. This is not what was submitted or what Mr. Beldock wants. Mr. Burgess read a letter from lawyers representing Larkin-Milot partnership. They asked for a pitched roof and relocation of the parking entrance to lessen the contrast between the residential and commercial parts of the development. Mr. Beldock noted the entrance couldn't be placed where hey are requesting because it violated setback requirements. He also noted that Gerry Milot has seen the plans and has no objections. Mr. Weith said that in 1992, Mr. Milot had offered to give the Planning Commission design review rights. The Commission then approved the design of the retail building which included the grey clapboard construction. After a brief discussion, members felt the Beldock design was acceptable and didn't feel it would be detrimental to the L&M projects. Mr. Weith said he would warn a Revised Final Plat for the change in design from the original L&M approval. Mr. Collins, representing Merrill Theaters, said they are con- cerned with the adequacy of parking. He noted that 333 of the theaters parking spaces are shared with the rest of the devel- opment. It is their feeling that having the parking entrance at the south end of the building would be better for the theater as it is more obvious for theater goers. Mr. Weith noted that this had been addressed at the time of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION 24 MAY 1994 page 3 Mr. Austin said the Commission needs to address this type of problem where a PCD has many different business owners. 4. Review proposal by Eric Fleggenheimer to construct an ad- ditional break in the Dorset St. median in the vicinity of the Net Result building: Mr. Teeson stepped down during this discussion due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Weith reviewed the background of the proposal, noting that Mr. Fleggenheimer has met with the City Council on this issue. The plan is for a private road going all the way back to San Remo Drive. City Council discussion centered on this becoming a public street. Mr Weith noted that the Council will have the final decision but wanted the Planning Commission to review the proposal. The proposal would require revised site plan approval because it would cause changes to the site. Mr. Fleggenheimer said he had found a map of the City Center actually showing such a road in this location. Mr. Weith added that this is part of the official city map which proposes to split the San Remo block into two smaller blocks; however, the official map doesn't show a break in the median. Mr. Burgess stressed that the Commission had to consider this as a planning issue, from a planning point of view, not whether it is good for business. Mr. Fleggenheimer said his traffic study saw no significant safety drawbacks to a break in the median. It recommended a left turn in but no left turn out. The proposed intersection would be similar to the Dorset St./San Remo Drive intersections. Mr. Burgess said a break would pose one more potential for a problem and would make the situation slightly worse from a level of ser- vice point of view in 1999 (from LOS "A" to "B"). Mr. Fleggenheimer then showed changes in parking and the location of green space. The question of a city street vs. private street then arose. Mr. Fleggenheimer said he is proposing a private road with a right of way for public use. It was noted that if it were to become a public street, the required widths would take away most of the Net Result parking. Members raised the question of safety with a private right of way, since cars would be backing out of parking spaces along the building into the right-of-way. Mr. Hafter noted that as it is now, southbound cars have to make a U-turn at San Remo to access businesses on the San Remo block. 6z; µ tz - g. .3(Y f . �4 6/14/94 MOTION OF APPROVAL GREGG BELDOCK I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Gregg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, 20,000 square foot movie theater (1,000 seats), a 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3,500 square foot restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of revising the approved building elevations of the proposed 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page 1 entitled "Bananas University Plaza, L&M Park Subdivision, 1885 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Gregory Rabideau, Architect, dated 3/25/94 with a last revision date of 5/31/94, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Any change to these approved plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 6/14 94 MOTION OF APPROVAL GREGG BELDOCK I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Gregg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, 20,000 square foot movie theater (1,000 seats), a 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3,500 square foot restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of revising the approved building elevations of the proposed 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page 1 entitled "Bananas University Plaza, L&M Park Subdivision, 1885 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Gregory Rabideau, Architect, dated 3/25/94 with a last revision date of 5/31/94, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Any change to these approved plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. /z e ---------- --- -- 1-44 00" le e4 _0 oo-� PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 June 10, 1994 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Revise Building Elevations, 7 Fayette Road Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 14, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith,/ 74 City Planner JW/mcp Encls M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: June 14, 1994 agenda items Date: June 10, 1994 3) GREGG BELDOCK - REVISED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -REVISED FINAL PLAT This application is to revise a condition of the 3/3/92 L&M Park amendment approving certain building elements/design for the retail building. Sketch plan was reviewed on 5/24/94 (minutes enclosed). 4) DORSET LAND COMPANY - GENERAL/MEDICAL OFFICE & NURSING/CONVALESCENT HOME - PRELIMINARY PLAT This project consists of amending a previously approved PCD consisting of 156,000 square feet of medical office, general office, cafe/deli and retail use in five (5) buildings on 11.64 acres of land. The amendment consists of: 1) constructing 88,740 square feet of medical and general office use, 2) constructing a 124 unit nursing/convalescent home and 3) subdividing the 11.64 acre parcel into eight (8) parcels ranging in size from 0.14 acres to 5.13 acres. The sketch plan was reviewed on 2/2/94 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 421 Dorset Street lies within the CD3 and R-7 Districts. It is bounded on the south by a multi -family residential development and GMP sub -station, on the east by Dorset Street, on the north by Sherry Road and some residences and on the west by Oakwood Drive and some residences. Access/circulation: Access to the development will be provided by a new City street with a 60 foot r.o.w. with a 30 foot roadway width connecting Sherry Road with Dorset Street. The new City street will have five (5) curb cuts serving parking areas for the office building and the driveway for the nursing home. Plans do not show a north bound left turn lane into the new City street from Dorset Street. If the applicant proposes to have a left turn lane, the applicant should show a revised Dorset Street that allows these turning movements. Circulation is adequate. Sherry Road: The previous PCD approval required that approximately 300 feet of Sherry Road be upgraded to City standards with the RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3051 (plus SENT TO -Tupperware postage) POSTMARK OR DATE cy) STREET AND NO. CD 390--Patchen Road, P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE -Z-o� Bur 1 ing lion , VT T— EES IL MFA OJ �0 SO RETURN delivered ........... 150 Wim a nvery u, a6aressee e only ............ 650 RECEIPT 2. Sho whom, date and where Shows to w delivered .. 3 SERVICES P With delivery to addressee only ............ 8500 4 0 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 504 0 SPECIADELIVERY (extra _fq. required) .................................... z 'PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— 3800 Apr. (See other side) 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL , GP O : 1974 0 - 551-454 STAMP TO. AVOID IMAGE DELETION H t Na ---- 0 --- 4 v 0 a 8 O 0 WX m -- O K©l > rmr GREGORY RABIDEAU, ARCHITECT BANANAS UNIVERSITY PLAZA DM FEVOW5/%M"WMAEVnnwrl MAnt®.oaMFWatwAWM.W-04M A w 86 LAKE STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 L & M PARK SUBDIVISION *V8W5,WMWOMN000=nEve®.Wt&WSAWW 1185 SHELBURNE ROAD (802) 863-0222 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT UMBER O`/ TAR AYRRICAN INRTITUTR 00 ARCNITRCTR _ PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday. June 14, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to consider, the following: I 1) Preliminary Plat appli- cation of Dorset Land Company to amend a pre- viously approved planned commercial development' consisting of 156.000, square feet of medical' offi-:e, general office, caf- e/dell, and retail use in five (5) buildings on 11.64 acres of land, 421 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing 88,740 square feet of medical and general office use and a 124 unit nurs- ery/convalescent home in three (3) buildings on 11.64 acres. 2) Final plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, for su division of 116.7 acres of and into 13 lots rangglng n size from 3.06 to 49.5 Scree, Hinesburg Road. 3) Revised final plat appii- :atio,i of Gregg Beldock :o amend an approved Manned commercial de- velopment consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 •oom hotel, 20,000 square oot movie theater (1,000 seats), a 22,500 square oot restaurant/retall/in- foor recreation building, a 000 square foot fast - Continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES 1 food restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of revising the approved building eleva- tions of the proposed 22,500 square foot res- taurant/retail/indoor rec- reation building. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission MAY 25 ' 94 11 : i 1D CITY -) SUPL I IGTOrl i P.1!1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINALr, PLAT 1) Name of Applicant L4A 2) Name of Subdivision K S) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plIt designer since preliminary plat apPl i.cati,on _ - 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental, timetable, since Preliminary plat application: _._i 17 S 5) Submit five copies and pne reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and c ntaining all information required under Section 202.1 o� the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Sub, wo draft co \Q,f all legal documents required undo ection 2. 11), d (1.2) of the subdivision regula ons r m'n r d" ision and under Section 204.1(b) fori a s d' Z S /� l (Signat a plicant or contact person Da e Post -it"' brand tax transmittal memo 767-1�" N of page6 LTI� 176LQ1DN- From JCS Wei Co. Co. Dept- Phone # Fax N J y �� / Fax # nc�.,t.ttrNrtn K Contents 90% Pro-Consumor • 10% Poet -Consumer fade No. Of Pages Proposal J.S. LANG4 CO, INC. 51 Upper Main Street ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 (802) 078.5720 PROPOSAI. WOMITTRO TO PI/ONE .DATE Mr. Gregg Belldock _._.._.._...._.---.._...... .. 5/27/94 _.. _. BTRECT JOB NAME -----.......__. . .......... _._� - ------.._......... CITY, STATC and ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION I _..__.... So. Burlington, Vt. 054.0.3._,... ... _...... ___......_......_._...... ARCI1ITr:CT bATt3 OP PLAN$ JOD PHONE I vY�c propoaf hereby to furnloh material and labor — complete in accordance with specifications below, for the sum of'. - I _FIFTEEN _-THOUSAND , ONE HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE AND NO/100--(1ncl,tax)anllare(g0 I, Payment to bo mado as follows: All matorlat is guttn>.ntuod to bo 99 epoo fiQ4. All work to be completed In a workmanlike i mannor according to etandnro preotlos. Any alteration or devlatlon from specifications be- Authorized low Involvinp oxlr8 Co91e will I)o oxoculed only upon written orders, and will become an Slgnaturo extra ohargo ovot and abovo the oallmalo. All aeroomonttt contingent upon strikes, acoi- dents or dolnys boyono our control. Owner to carry fire, tomado and other necessary NoAThiaoem may be Insurance. Our wotknro aro fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if n0 accepted within .._ days. _ i Wo horot)y submit spnclflrallons and eatlmates for: J.S. Lang & Co,. Inc, will provide top quality nursery grown plant material. Installation will follow standard horticultural procedures including the use of compost and fertilizer. The trees will be staked as needed. All plantings will ............... . be mulched with 2-3rr of shredded bark, J.S. Lang & Co., Inc, will guarantee the plantings for a period of one year. Plants damaged by vandalism, mechanical- {{II _ _ _II chemical injury or by the neglect of others will not be covered. Size ......... ..._. ....... ............... Quantitz Plant Material 2�-311cal. 22 Red Maple 21j-311cal. 5 Honey Locust IY'cal . 27 Cft+rbapple 6.71ht, 21 Austrian Pine 2;_311cal , 9 Red Oak i J %���J����� ������� �� -- ____ - — r � � ��� �� � � �' � �1���= - � � _�� -- -- -- - - � �' `� � S.sS` ---� -_ �, -- - --- �� � ?5 - _ / 5 �5 ``� --- - -- ��.��� x� �- r ��5 ___ __ PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 14, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Preliminary Plat application of Dorset Land Company to amend a previously approved planned commercial development consisting of 156,000 square feet of medical office, general office, cafe/deli, and retail use in five (5) buildings on 11.64 acres of land, 421 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing 88,740 square feet of medical and general office use and a 124 unit nursery/convalescent home in three (3) buildings on 11.64 acres. 2) Final plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into 13 lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, Hinesburg Road. 3) Revised final plat application of Gregg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, 20,000 square foot movie theater (1,000 seats), a 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3,100 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of revising the approved building elevations of the proposed 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission May 28, 1994 M(C 25� o— 4mw —25Y /ot C.00lf b) The landscapi,,)plan and schedule shall 1 )revised so that they are consistent in terms of numbers of plantings to be in- stalled. 7. The South Burlington Zoning Regulations permit planned unit developments (PUD) including planned commercial developments (PCD) in order to encourage innovation in design (Sections 11.50 and 19.15) and require that PUD's and PCD's consider aesthetic compatibility with existing buildings and site characteristics (Section 19.151(g)). In an effort to determine compliance with these criteria, the Planning Commission required the applicant to submit, for review and approval building elevations for the retail building and fast-food restaurant building. The Planning Commission approves as a component of this application the two (2) page set of building elevation and floor plans entitled "McDonald's Corporation, Series 2000 Plus Building," drawn by JMH and dated received 2/25/92, and the three page set of plans entitled "L&M Park Retail Building" prepared by Gregory T. Rabi- deau and dated 3/3/92. In addition, based upon the expressed representation of the applicant, the exterior of the structures shall be constructed of warm gray wood clapboard, warm fiberglass shingle roof (slate colored) and white trim. Any change shall require approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission. 8. Prior to occupancy of either the fast-food restaurant or retail building, the proposed traffic signal on Shelburne Road shall be installed. In addition, the applicant shall be respon- sible for properly timing the signal and synchronize all traffic lights from I-189 to Allen Road. Prior to installation of the new signal and synchronizing of all signals, the applicant shall submit a letter to the planner from VAOT which indicates approval of the signal installation and synchronization improvements. 9. The revised final plat shall be signed by the Planning Commis- sion Chairman or Clerk and recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. IN Chairman or Clerk, South Burlington Planning Commission rC2 Da, e 4 J Iq I- ff :'lHT'G4—y4 Wit 10 10 c r tiri NU OUC GOO LOCG F. UC SAXHI ANDERSON WOLIN_SKY & SUNSHINE A T I O A 4 1 ♦ 9 A T I A . Uwt L+ws0r. LAM[ V.O. 8( 15 )5 Am U:0. In Arnra',p.N" I OALINC!UN, Vi.11MIW 0S402-150; JULIA E. 11Ni L[TUNT 1�, VW C f:UJ�Af,'• TEL: (802) 658 • 82%, J DAwn M. $ur41111r.II [rl1cup.1 C. Grltn:�In, J1,1 Fnx (802) 865.3922 DO'KIWOH `'yols" Mnlcr t' Kkr,ur' 32 C.01'0e(L!A S1kNvY L'nu F. 4b'ESTGn?CI L-) ht.4ailr: I'IA 1'1.1I I5611M(;.f I. iNY 1),)I,IQIAS J. WUI,INSYA' f)nv; , P"r-Irlc" (518! S61-oR(!(1 ' AWAIMC) IN VIIINVIN: f'Hlur L1 Snxr,t' (f.,c (,SIx) 503•119:i 'Aoko RCJ .Ir: NI"uI Y-M.-uvr�slc [ May 24, 1994 VSA FACSIM l& Joe Weith City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Review, L & M Park/Beldock Dear Joe: Larkin Milot Partnership fully supports the proposed development of the remaining commercial po.etion of L & M Park, by Gregg Beldock. They believe that the proposed project is consistent with the overall use contemplated in the commercial portion of the this development. The approval obtained by the Partnership for this portion of the project was conceptual, and based upon a proposed two-story building. The proposed use by Gregg Beldock does not require the construction of two-story building. The design submi4ted by Mr. Beldock, in our opinion, could be improved, wit:,. the addition of a pitched roof similar in design to the roof lines depicted in the preliminary plans, which consisted of a six and twelve pitch with dormers and recess gables. Additionally, the parking garage entrance should be .located on the south end of the building, with appropriate signage to encourage use by the public. We believe that this will lessen the contrast between the commercial and residential portions of this development. If you need fur-Eher input, please do not hesitate to contact either Gerry Milot or John Larkin. Very truly yo�xs, a _ 1 E . Wes r ..gate , sEsq . GL�'4V: W.tp 7,71 nt Of volume file : d:data\soback2.vol Network used for assignment : d:data\soback.r-jet Triptable used for assignment : d:data\soback2.tab Traffic zones in network 16 First external zone I Trip table covers 1 hours TOTAL VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED = 18866 TOTAL VEHICLE HOURS TRAVELED = 39i volume range 1-) 250 number of links in range = volume range 251-> 500 number of links in range = volume range 501-> 1000 number of links in range = volume range 1501-) 2000 number of links in range = volume range 2001-> 2500 number of links in rancie = FERCENT ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR = 0-1.9 Number of assignment iterations requested Turn Restrictions Used as Follows m node 1 through node 34 to node 3- Dm node 19 through node 34 to node 71 From node 3.4 through node 19 to node -- rom node 20 through node 1 � to node 14. From node 35 through node 20 to node m node 21 1 throi.,!g!h node 28 t ,:, node �r r-) M node 35 through node 34 to node 17 %RMSE= = 1.10 5 'RMSE= 0.2z. 2 %RMSE= 0.19 3 %RMSE= 0.05 2 %RMSE= = 0-07 v)Cah �oc �46 ;� /9 _2 441or 6 /� Page #2 Certificate of Service #4C0473-6 Donna Chandler Vermont Department of Health P.O. Box 70 Burlington, VT 05402 Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 14th day of May, 1993. wKaf-fier'ine Cooper 1 l 4C0473-6.CS FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCOR )ATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO DATE � � r+ JOB NO. ATTENTION H6 RE: WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order (��/(,y4 itZ "��G►�� NG� COPIES I DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections )(_6nogi� �G:_ ❑ Resubmit ❑ Submit _ ❑ Return —copies for approval _ copies for distribution corrected prints 1 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO RECYCLED PAPER: Contents: 40 % Pre -Consumer - 10% Post -Consumer SIGNED: 4J/W If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once_ FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCOi MATED Engineering and Planning Seevices One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO DATE M2q` �/ JOB NO. ATTENTI6N"'"' lv- RE: WE ARE SENDING YOU 4 1 ttached ❑ Under separate cover via AWICI the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION s ,� THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As re fed or review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US JWq ) _ J Litly o SO on rlipq COPY TO i7 REC4MIAPER: Contents:40% Pre -Consumer -10%Post-Consumer SIGNED: '"e If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 19, 1994 Charles Van Winkle FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Indoor Recreation, Retail & Restaurant Building, L&M Park Dear Mr. Van Winkle: Enclosed please find a copy of the February 22, 1994 Planning Commission minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plan be recorded within 90 days of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith,� City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Greg Rabideau Gregg Beldock Gerald Milot 1.. a: N/F SOUTH BURLWGTON N CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH (ro• YONT •u•�)b•P"IT PaoPGL� e� ILc Toa s9 s C I `\` ^`^ •1vP `IEa o W �s EE 4 E l• ./ r 0.'" � IN✓. 1"..1------------------- 0. i / /� I / / / �i�ffi■� + 71�/ T__.-� • ",'"i x �% >,.s•r�'iT/' I ! rr>F. 7�s. � 'Su.��cw � _ r '- T' / I �_ 1 '-'� - '- -"_/ -'/". � ^ `_" a le♦1A, � °-'. H e aµ `-t { F- - -._ r .� .,. �• ' `,>, I ..` : �. ,( '= _ r'� I I , I (i " iu:i.. vf` _ I Fi' I �p I � I I v �♦ �' 4� � V �� � ,\ I y 2� �1 I i I `I e� ui D Y I I _^ � � I - 0 I iG 1 / � ' � I 9- I _ _ __ G'Y _ _ _` _ � ___ . ___-.• ! _ F RP / F Pn iv L TABLE OF STRUCTURES mot^ er. ouz,E pYO. R!M !NV COMMENT DI I 201.1 194.5 - DI 2 201. I 196.1 DI 3 200.5 195.5 01 9 01.0 196.0 DI 5 195.6 190.6 - DI 6 195.6 194 i DI 7 186.9 181.9 DI 8 186.9 181.0 DI 9 190.7 185.7 DI 10 188.5 183.5 DI It 187.9 182.9 DI 12 187.9 182.0 DI IJ 185.7 780.7 0114 783.0 1770 DI F5 182.5 176.5 DI 16 199.8 194.O DI 17 2010, 195.5 DI 18 ?0LO 194.5 Of 19 185.7 181.5 149 202.7 7si6.3 DI 21 200.1 196.5 DI 22 201.0 193.E DI 23 201.0 196.0 DI 24 200.3 1 195.0 DI 25 197.7 I w,u 01 48 185.7 /80.0 MH 1 701.8 I91.B -.._ MH 2 197.1 190.1 MH J 188.9 182. 0199 --01 '99.0 1935. -------- -- -- 26 188.8 181,O DI 96 188.0 82.5 D/ 97 191.O 194,0 DI I ='T \ � _. • cool tee. y as .''I ��\\ '� \ I -_ _ @-'n: L. i • Ite `: IYo•Yu��Tic�,T„ j I L / 1 y / / Pa."• \� i I i _. / _. /_- - 1 �I i• • I 1 = LG�r�sT..n ` 7 P aET x . ii.. 1 ..... .... b) 2 ,dc..c ✓Qn7 no�'v r T > l� �/�~�• / { /. �� I t � 4� // - �_ T! • IAP{ t if,rL GE._!% FI U<T IL%Y S. L;L3 I I • 41 i :;/" / • � t �...._ / � N / <'IsSJ.`_ _ � ! � � e~ �i`.v<ko1 M�Ur1`�i T I -H .�� � � iC - / NI � a i • '/e. Paw. r-�or J .. a "iIT�--T`;I.W.. ' I I � � ♦ / ! GS 1 i Wei pP �u4 x¢.wa Mlac- I ■c+OX 4' O�LG�FTGpR G¢qb P 4J� GR.ApG. w✓Ga,G G¢O _wp Tn rbL /tl./pr PARKING LOT DETAIL" SHOWING UNDERDRAIN NT•� �•+''IC.o r aco � h frI�S. REFERENCE PLANS _ 1. FOR ALL PROPERTY LINE AND RIGHT -OF -NAY INFORMATION SEE PLAN ENTITLED "L 8 M PARK - PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAN", BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED DRAWING NUMBER D-3724, DATED DEC. 1990 2. FOR DETAIL OF SHELBURNE ROAD (RTE. 7). SEE "L 8 M PARK, TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANS AND DETAILS", D-3978, D-3979, D4031-D4035 BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED LEGEND / � ''\ O - ` ` ' l� '+3._J'-- I o • /- PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENT LINE y� •- SETBACK LINE �.. l l X 1!i• _ I ha 1 ''"u I - - - - - - -I-- - - - - EXISDMG CONTOUR -- - - -- - -- PROPOSED CONTOUR 4 N 5a's-0- PROPOSED SANITARY SEW£R/11ANH0L£ Itz) EXISRNC WATER LINE di . \. • ►• e•w-� PROPOSED % / T�d's n ,x �+ � i / ^.� � 2 � SED WATER LINE/VALI>f/HYURANT -�• u _- , ro-,"• - x LET PROPOSED !; i t i'FAYETTE R� ECE i . Li SANITARY FORCE MAIN -i -- I ACINwE V 66 vaQ SkD: ro! Yra:' x P�osco STORM No M � o SEWER/IN _ RORAIN 1( -'. ell�l° ;IuluDll _ - --' w u'P _- PROPOSED CURB I I i I�J a1 �� 5'EXISTING STORM SEWER/ INLET IT�WTER d DM.., ,IxxN,NxM _ FEB 1 1 1994 I, _ I I n... ,ter I I ( I I,.. ,I ( I 1 \ (\ t>r•'.-- - "'+� - 1 \ I ' 1 4 1 1 \ ` � "\ � � �� I _ � --- _; � ( �, •`E.'`r'��n�m "' I I I: � ,� '�� �?� +��1♦,�PPJ^w �I •� :,._r.,E I �' I I + 1 '\ \ �•..•,. i.. I \T- tee... >.Gy - �� \I I '�*,-�'k, I i'' I vo �`_"J1 Ski. Burlington V GRAPHIC SCALE o Iw DIN FEET ) IL J ,p z IT /S THE USERS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THESE DRAWINGS INCLUDE THE LATEST RENSIONS _ Wm_ J j PRELIMINARY PLAT ACT 250 AMENDMENT j I An V\ FINAL PLAT CONSTRUC770N INDICATES APPHDVA(5 STAGE MF DESIGN l5 CURRENR 1' lN. "pow - y", h,l L & M PARK I I I / I -.:� - ?.�,y R !�e4'b' fl's•SW 3 ADp Da afy r„nb PAQr., Je,, uE.l•iE N'1. D'• We✓r x to ",9SOUTH BURLING- - YERMDNT .. { _. _ _ _. - '. _'1 ._. _ _ / _ _ ■■ ■■��•■s�■■��us■�i�iYii�+t 4i�rr■at•�■■ ; 1■� .w FI _ _ I �-- � _- -'�T F-.l��/-. -�] _-_ - .._:: .:_w � �w x�' .I�� . -:•--..a_.._.. L_� 11 . � � u ,E 11';::,, --SITE &UTILITIES PLAN--- \. {- F.-1-r J-7 S r I �( / � 1 ■sue■■ v �Jh .M x Io9.s 5s 1 --{ I I I ■■ ■•�■� � 1 "� '. kFV .F_G Y: IL IVNI. t<x)i Vlr iNl r'ti V I I✓IJi w/AIIL'w/Al L'An.l,( i■a_. ..�■.n ..f.�.i[}�..aa_.■■�.. N�F FARRELL v e .,+3 .EDEDr Lr -c Lr. C•., <YucCu.q -1.3191 ¢Ev�E c,¢roF. not: 7T��L-T��E ?eOLE 10 I'.o�L2 ae�,-.i ¢or o.+-x RanP�a.ol-n, ¢Wnt aw'D".+I-+a.� cA. �Aul= /�///) R __. ___ -> /.rM1■•^O na[.. �TIl•� L�� b. S.qL Ap .JVT (D A L_�RO Y� 88047 '� l., 11 LE. .E ,-Y"...ew:.l<+�-/ RfTPi�.. uVl✓ T41 re.lE .: .a....: , 1 L'i '11 flG >M�G 'yTGQ n �Cv tQ, P"1 �s 7 I I�i •11 Pe ¢ rKl naIT, REvi6E �-rTlu ,mfiv _ '✓DGQ-(--RP K-. 1 R¢L0 J4 2E MVE awl TI -I--1 `12. Y... waTcPwID P. p NDNA 1j F � V ll ll O 1 _. iM• I 4Vi✓ -rfR Jl,:.� "I. U RF ✓.'�G RCTP.._ KV-ai. �ti bGT, GwJi�tiT � '�fDRr-n Mr �� 18 'li 7�-v hl� ,�G4 .� bl-WR �, PD✓ 6f�`iTP.>PC,-•Ti Qe.w ne Ji/Nf 1990 e +�fQ Ppp 'L ___ J �T r.• R.. r.E- Q.�,>,.. .fi P.�,..C- w/��� ZZ �i'11�9I �UV •>FtT ELRvnTpNS, un(R, REV Sf S-(o¢,n SEw.GR S�Lb• Br :�' II ,v,..a;>,T L.-iP 1 r. Ll.•.il RE,.,�iG->Tc"c.n E CR'- �•J 9-19-91 RLN 7t RAJ I of [,VRg•'y 4T ENTftk (_. 0, 1.. -n041, '>EwB4 DFIJ aenl Qe.:._,G yr .,<.r�o.,:•�. r-,-°�+- E.«+inc.we. r v �+--11 Ru-wre e,. r,.., LI z :.-i- n ¢¢... �.>G vw:v¢.arr �C, Gx>RW W( L.-UWr.+). PDO ->NL T �- c- 11 P..'c E,-<"spr -.. Lx��T:1:'�/{aaQ.-C�Aiµq(et...-.�T'1.�.,7 Po.-, I�j B -I.PI� Rr,>aI ..•a.-f7mac�-r n.I v_. =rL.� ✓G _�L,-,_.. �'.6. vT-uf-�ua�.--.GmQ.J,C.� li INCORPORATED _ewe. e, 14 IO 2'1'199 E.'e cm7Pw7, Dw 9D.x-w3c 4xu8ue1 2'.1 PE�PT,L,TIM5;n0 WDEwxj"o rP.Je, N-E-G MD hNG u _ SEN"CES WILLISTON VERMONT ," City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 30, 1994 Charles Van Winkle FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Indoor recreation, Retail & Restaurant Building, L&M Park Dear Mr. Van Winkle: Enclosed please find a copy of Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on February 22, 1994. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days of the approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. 5i erel , Jo Weith, Cit Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Greg Rabideau Gregg Beldock Gerald Milot t Z v,9q Pc Mrbr c� 0T Jx T 0 ^J6- �; C rt,1 � f- 2/22/94 MOTION OF APPROVAL L&M PARK - BANANAS UNIVERSITY I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Gregg Beldock to amend an approved I planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, 20,000 square foot movie theater (1000 seats), 22,000 square feet of retail use, a 3,100 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive -through, and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists f: 1) replacing the 22,000 square foot retail building with a 22,-5O square foot building consisting of 11,000 square feet of recreat"o 1/entertainment use, 3.e_Ft#9 square ._.feet---of—retail_ _ use, and square feet of standard restaurant use (170 seats) , and 2 ) increasing the size of the fast- food restaurant from 3,100 square feet to 3,500 square feet, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled, "L&M Park, Site & Utilities Plan", prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. and dated June, 1990, last revised 2/10/94, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The planning commission approves 489 spaces for the commercial portion of the planned commercial development which represents a waiver of 140 spaces, or 22%. It is the commission's opinion that 489 spaces will adequately serve the commercial portion of the development due to the specific mix of uses and differing times of peak parking demand. 3. All exterior lighting shall be downcasting and shielded and shall not cast light beyond the property line. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for the new building, the applicant shall submit for approval by the City Planner details of all exterior lighting to be installed on and in the vicinity of the new building. Any future change in existing lighting or new lighting anywhere in the entire L&M Park development shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 4. The plan shall be revised prior to recording to show that eleven (11) "stacking unit" parking spaces will be provided, not ten. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. 5. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall renew the existing landscaping bond which expired recently. 7. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Chair or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy permit from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the new building. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy permit, the applicant shall complete the following: a) install landscaping in the vicinity of the theater and along Fayette Road. b) construct sidewalk along the north side of Fayette Road. c) install bus shelter along Shelburne Road. d) remove flood lights in front of McDonald's and bank, and near theater. 9. Any changes to the final plat plans shall require Planning Commission approval. (mo-LMP) 2/22/94 MOTION OF APPROVAL L&M PARK - BANANAS UNIVERSITY I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Gregg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, 20,000 square foot movie theater (1000 seats), 22,000 square feet of retail use, a 3,100 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive -through, and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of: 1) replacing the 22,000 square foot retail building with a 22,500 square foot building consisting of 11,000 square feet of recreational/entertainment use, 3,500 square feet of retail use, and 8,000 square feet of standard restaurant use (170 seats) , and 2 ) increasing the size of the fast- food restaurant from 3,100 square feet to 3,500 square feet, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled, "L&M Park, Site & Utilities Plan", prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. and dated June, 1990, last revised 2/10/94, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The planning commission approves 489 spaces for the commercial portion of the planned commercial development which represents a waiver of 140 spaces, or 22%. It is the commission's opinion that 489 spaces will adequately serve the commercial portion of the development due to the specific mix of uses and differing times of peak parking demand. 3. All exterior lighting shall be downcasting and shielded and shall not cast light beyond the property line. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for the new building, the applicant shall submit for approval by the City Planner details of all exterior lighting to be installed on and in the vicinity of the new building. Any future change in existing lighting or new lighting anywhere in the entire L&M Park development shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 4. The plan shall be revised prior to recording to show that eleven (11) "stacking unit" parking spaces will be provided, not ten. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. 5. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall renew the existing landscaping bond which expired recently. 7. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Chair or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy permit from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the new building. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy permit, the applicant shall complete the following: a) install landscaping in the vicinity of the theater and along Fayette Road. b) construct sidewalk along the north side of Fayette Road. c) install bus shelter along Shelburne Road. d) remove flood lights in front of McDonald's and bank, and near theater. 9. Any changes to the final plat plans shall require Planning Commission approval. (mo-LMP) 2/22/94 MOTION OF APPROVAL L&M PARK - BANANAS UNIVERSITY I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Gregg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, 20,000 square foot movie theater (1000 seats), 22,000 square feet of retail use, a 3,100 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive -through, and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of: 1) replacing the 22,000 square foot retail building with a 22,500 square foot building consisting of 11,000 square feet of recreational/entertainment use, 3,500 square feet of retail use, and 8,000 square feet of standard restaurant use (170 seats) , and 2 ) increasing the size of the fast- food restaurant from 3,100 square feet to 3,500 square feet, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled, "L&M Park, Site & Utilities Plan", prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. and dated June, 1990, last revised 2/10/94, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The planning commission approves 489 spaces for the commercial portion of the planned commercial development which represents a waiver of 140 spaces, or 22%. It is the commission's opinion that 489 spaces will adequately serve the commercial portion of the development due to the specific mix of uses and differing times of peak parking demand. 3. All exterior lighting shall be downcasting and shielded and shall not cast light beyond the property line. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for the new building, the applicant shall submit for approval by the City Planner details of all exterior lighting to be installed on and in the vicinity of the new building. Any future change in existing lighting or new lighting anywhere in the entire L&M Park development shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 4. The plan shall be revised prior to recording to show that eleven (11) "stacking unit" parking spaces will be provided, not ten. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. 5. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. permit 6. Prior LO issuance of a GVillilg� ,✓ui�.La a. iy i„, .-, the Annlicant rc shall renew the existing landscaping bond which expired recently. 7. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Chair or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy permit from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the new building. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy permit, the applicant shall complete the following: a) install landscaping in the vicinity of the theater and along Fayette Road. b) construct sidewalk along the north side of Fayette Road. c) install bus shelter along Shelburne Road. d) remove flood lights in front of McDonald's and bank, and near theater. 9. Any changes to the final plat plans shall require Planning Commission approval. (mo-LMP) Memorandum - Planning February 22, 1994 agenda items February 18, 1994 Page 2 3) L&M PARK - INDOOR RECREATION RETAIL & RESTAURANT - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of an amendment to the L&M Park PCD to change p foot reta f r square ,' the use of the previously approved 22,000 sq indoor recreation use, 2) .t� building to: 1) 11,000 square feet of 170 seat standard restaurant (6,250 square feet), 3) 3,750 square , feet of retail use (hobby shop), 4) reduce size of building to the building on a 22,250 square 21,000 square feet and 5) place structure. This project was last reviewed foot sub -surface parking by the Planning Commission as a sketch plan on 12/14/93 (minutes enclosed). The McDonald's building was approved for 3,100 square feet but was The trip and parking constructed at 3,500 square feet. generation information was based on the higher number. Staff requirement recommends that this application be amended to request the increase in size of the McDonald's building. Access/circulation: Access to the proposed building will be via a 26 foot curb cut on Fayette Road. This curb cut was relocated the and is no longer opposite the approximately 60 feet to north curb cut for the theater. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: The following coverage information pertains to the commercial portion of the L&M Park project. Building coverage feet). is 65,276 square feet (maximum allowed is 125,453 square feet (maximum allowed is 292,723 Overall coverage is 249,392 square square feet). The 40 foot setback requirement from Fayette Road is not being met. Commission under The setback proposed is 35 feet. The Planning regulations may modify the setback Section 11.507b of the zoning requirements. The Planning Commission waived the setback for the previous building. Parking: The shared parking study submitted by the applicants The plan provides indicates a peak parking demand of 489 spaces. and 56 sub -surface, a total of 489 spaces (433 surface spaces for the commercial portion of the project. Eleven ( 11) of spaces) the surface spaces will be provided by using stacking units which stack cars one above the other (see enclosed). 2 Memorandum - Planning February 22, 1994 agenda items February 18, 1994 Page 3 Applicant should submit noise information on the stacking unit with hours of operation. Staff is concerned about the potential noise impact on the adjacent residential area. Bicycle parking is being provided as required under Section 19.253b of the zoning regulations at the southerly end of Phase II. Landscaping: The landscaping proposed in the vicinity of the proposed building is substantially the same as was proposed for the retail building. The landscaping plan has been revised to accurately reflect existing and proposed plantings.,n Applicant has not completed landscaping around the theater. No a occupancy of the proposed building should be allowed until this landscaping has been planted. The applicant has allowed a three (3) year landscaping bond to expire after only one (1) year. Repeated attempts by staff to have this bond continued for two (2)' years has failed. Therefore, staff recommends that a. zoning/building permit not be issued until this requirement has 10k been met. Traffic: The L&M Park PCD was approved for a maximum of 623 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant submitted a trip generation assessment which estimates 440 P.M. peak hour vte's. This is 183 vte's less than allowed. Sewer: The L&M Park development has a sewer allocation of 55,000 \,, gpd for new uses. Staff calculates that the existing and proposed°"\' uses require an allocation of 51,209 gpd. Therefore, no additional'`'' allocation is needed. kt C.O. Zone: The plans were revised to keep the parking area and proposed building from encroaching into the C.O. Zone. Lighting: Applicant is proposing unique exterior lighting for the; parking area and building. These lights are currently under design so the details are not available. Applicant has indicated that all lights will be downcasting and shielded. The details of all � exterior lighting should be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Staf f discovered that five ( 5 ) flood lights which were not shown on the lighting plan have been installed. Two (2) in front of McDonald's, one (1) in front of the bank, one (1) on the corner of Fayette Road and the theater driveway and one (1) attached to the °µ i 3. t k� Memorandum - Planning February 22, 1994 agenda items February 18, 1994 Page 4 north side of the theater. This type of light is not acceptable to the City. These lights should be removed prior to the issuance of the permit for the proposed building. Other: --- the dumpster will be screened by a five (5) foot stockade fence. --- the bus shelter and the sidewalk along the north side of Fayette Road should be constructed from McDonald's to the residential development prior to occupancy of the proposed building. 4) FACTORY OUTLET MALL PARKING COUNTS Enclosed are the results of a 3-year parking study conducted at the Factory Outlet Mall. This study was required as a condition of approval for the T.J. Maxx addition granted in September, 1988 (see condition 7(e), enclosed). Parking counts were conducted on a Friday and Saturday of each month. Parking counts were broken down into seven (7) areas on the property (see enclosed plan). This allows one to document where on the site most people choose to park. The enclosed information shows peak Saturday and peak Friday parking demand. The following conclusions can be drawn: 1. There is an adequate number of spaces on site to accommodate peak parking demand. There are 597 spaces available on the site. The average Saturday peak is 424 vehicles while the average Friday peak is 309 vehicles. The highest peak recorded during the 3-year period was 521 vehicles on Saturday 11/21/92. 2. Peak parking demand occurs on Saturdays. Peak months typically include October, November and December. Lowest parking demand generally occurs in June and July. 3. The parking spaces in front of the Factory Outlet Mall (i.e., areas #1 and #2 ) are over -utilized while the parking spaces in rear of the site (i.e., areas #4 and #5) are under-utilized. For Saturdays, the average utilization rate for areas #1 and #2 is 79% and 104%, respectively. The average utilization rate for areas #4 and #5 is 47% and 50%, respectively. For Fridays, the average 4 02/11/1994 03,07 8628568 JIFFY LUBE PAGE 03 r-K ''COMMEW I AL DPOVI f RESWET4TIAL InOOZ L L M H 0 E PCOPAMEPCIA1 MERCIA1 DP004 I AfrWIFNITIAL DPOO4 I 11FIMUM fIAL DP1005, D , P005 COMMERCIAL TRIPLE TP006 I'ark thrVC UITS ill 11W 1POCC Of 011C, The SpaceMaker TP 006 Triple can be assembled %;Jc by side, or in a drive through single 11sw configuration. Troublestune gears, wire and cable have been eliminated in 64 unique design, Two cylinders directly connected to the platform perform all the work. Simplicity of design ensures many yeaks of safe and trouble free operation. CZOOO AUTOMATIC 4COMPUTERIZLO SERIES Al LL A 0 Available in 1994, the 2000 Series is a computerized parking system which does not require a parking atren- dant, A vchicic pdAcd on the top plmorm is rctvcvcd in the following rnannen, there is 2lW2y1.9 an open space on the City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 18, 1994 Charles Van Winkle FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Indoor Recreation, Retail & Restaurant Building, L&M Park Dear Mr. Van Winkle: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Jim Goddette were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 22, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, /1 i Joe Weith,� v City Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: Greg Rabideau Gregg Beldock I F ,�S, 'I) . 3 DOCUMENT BREAK l TO: Planning Commission FROM: Natural Resources Committee DATE: 28 April 1995 RE: L&M Partnership Sketch Plan Application as discussed on 14 March 1995 The Natural Resources Committee has expressed concern about six parking spaces and a dumpster that were shown on site plans to be encroaching in the minor stream CO Zone behind the business known as the Discovery Zone. As a result of meeting with Mr. Beldock following the Planning Commission meeting of 14 March, the Committee agreed to visit the site and make recommendations based on what was observed. Zoning Regulations were drafted in order to "maintain and improve the quality of natural resources such as soil, air, and water and the natural processes by which they are related , and insure a safe, healthful, and aesthetically -pleasing community. Any uses not expressly permitted are prohibited, except those which are allowed as conditional uses". The boundaries of the CO District clearly states in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, effective September 12, 1994, amended November 7, 1994. "All land along a minor stream or drainage way which is within 50 feet horizontal distance of the center -line of a minor stream or drainage -way". Allowed conditional uses include "outdoor recreation, research and educational activities, and hydro -electric power generation". This parking lot does not fit the above stated conditions. In fact, 3-401 states that 'Inn building... including any structure or construction such as parking lots are permissible". It is clearly stated that "no use shall be permitted that will in any way damage or alter the character of soils or vegetation or impair the quality of surface water". The Natural Resources Committee visited the parking lot and stream bank behind the Discovery Zone on 21 March 1995 at 4:30 PM. It was raining at the time and had been raining for most of the day. The Committee made the following observations: The stream: The stream flows in a well defined channel, twelve to eighteen inches deep, that meanders through its modest floodplain. The floodplain sediments appear to be fine sands. A geomorphic definition of a stream is a channelized flow of water. A channel is an eroded depression through which a stream flows. The stream was very turbid, there was excessive particulates being carried by the stream. Although the stream is not deep, the bottom was not visible indicating significant erosion of relatively small size particles. The Bank: The slope of the bank is relatively steep. It was found to be very difficult to climb up or down the stream due to the steep slope and composition of the bank, which was primarily clay. The bank is not stable and is easily eroded. At one point a member sank to ankle depth in clay and nearly lost their boot. The sediments making up the surface appear to be a variety of materials. There is tongue of white crushed rock commonly seen in construction that extends eighteen feet out from the curb toward the stream. The Committee observed patches of well sorted sand, mottled grey -brown clay, blue -grey clay, concrete slabs, and a one foot diameter pile of what appeared to be ashtray refuse, all in the CO Zone. This area appeared to have been filled within the last year. We observed eroding channels on the bank at least four inches deep. The bank stabilization steps taken appear to be limited to a few planted trees. There did not appear to be an attempt to use construction paper or straw. It is uncertain as to how grass would be planted on the crushed rock. The Dumpsters: One dumpster encroaching in the CO Zone is located in a wooden enclosure with a locking gate. The gate had been vandalized with its hinges torn off. In addition there was a dumpster outside the containment area with no fence around it. This dumpster was also clearly in the CO Zone. Debris was scattered around the dumpster. The Parking Lot: The parking spaces in question were found to be well within the CO Zone. A measure of fifty feet from the center -line of the stream found the CO Zone to end at approximately the center -line of the road that leads to the underground parking. The distance from the stream center -line to the parking lot curb is 33 feet. The Natural Resources Committee agrees with the Planning Commission, the parking spaces should all be of standard size with none of them in the CO Zone. The dumpsters should also be out of the CO Zone. After viewing the site in question, Mr. Beldock indicated that he would supply the Committee with a written plan for renovating the disturbed stream bank. As of this date, the Committee has not received this. The Natural Resources Committee makes the following recommendations: 1. Regarding the dumpsters: Keep the dumpsters out of the CO Zone. Construct a containment area of material that is more durable than wooden trellis. 2. Regarding the Parking lot: Move the parking area out of the CO Zone. Adjust the bank grade to a more stable configuration and restore the natural vegetation, a combination of grasses and shrubs. 3. Regarding the Area behind the Discovery Zone building: Stabilize the area between the building and stream by restoring natural vegetation of grasses and shrubs. TO: Planning commission FROM: Natural Resources Committee DATE: 28 April 1995 RE: Response to April 23, 1995 Memo from Griffin International regarding CO Zone encroachment at Banana's University Project 7 Fayette Drive, South Burlington As previously stated in our memo of April 28, 1995, the Natural Resources Committee made the following recommendations: 1. Regarding the dumpsters: Keep the dumpsters out of the CO Zone. Construct a containment area of material that is more durable than wooden trellis. 2. Regarding the Parking lot: Move the parking area out of the CO Zone. Adjust the bank grade to a more stable configuration and restore the natural vegetation, a combination of grasses and shrubs. 3. Regarding the Area behind the Discovery Zone building: Stabilize the area between the building and stream by restoring natural vegetation of grasses and shrubs. In addition, we feel that it is necessary to have a more accurate depiction of the center -line of the stream. The encroachment that we observed included two dumpsters encroaching in the CO Zone. One located in a wooden enclosure with a locking gate. The other dumpster was outside the containment area with no fence around it. The parking spaces in mi in Q+-i n-n Tac�-re� f niinrl -Fn 1-itn 1 u7i f bin thin (r) 7.rint- A mps--,irrp of fifty feet from the center -line of the stream found the CO Zone to end at approximately the center -line of the road that leads to the underground parking. The Natural Resources Committee measured the distance from the stream center -line to the parking lot curb as 33 feet. This does not agree with the measurements made by Griffin International. We would like a site visit to clarify the confusion. The stream is described in that it is perennial.. It is very probably fed in large part by a perennial wet area behind orchard School which is up slope. The stream is possibly carrying storm water from storm drains. The origin of this storm water is parking lots, streets, roof, and residential runoff. The geometry of the stream does indicate a southerly migration meander pattern. This is in part a strong argument for not allowing encroachment into the CO Zone. From an engineering standpoint, if the parking spaces are left as is they will be undercut that much sooner, requiring stream bank and parking lot maintenance in the form of bank stabilization. Streams erode and deposit. This is a truth that cannot be changed by ordinance. We can change by engineering tactics the pattern of erosion and deposition. This much is clear. The unclear piece is what happens after stabilization. In "stabilizing" the bank we only shift the erosion/deposition patterns down stream, making it someone else's problem. This is can be demonstrated in large scale projects as the Achafalaya River in Louisiana and in smaller scale as in the Potash Brook. We are not concerned only with the Surface area from the 11900 square feet" encroachment. We are concerned with the following: -the future health of the stream -additive effect of CO Zone encroachment -increased impermeable areas that once allowed infiltration of surface waters as well as overland flow, and the additive effects of this -reduction of overland flow where surface water is renovated through contact with soil, flora and fauna, sediment reduction -erosion occurring now due to rain and wind on area of the bank where there is no vegetation. -contained disregard for protecting steams and wetlands and CO Zones that serve multiple purposes store and slowly release storm water surface runoff renovation aesthetic value lost wildlife habitat surface waters run into Lake Champlain. By international agreement we are committed to improving and preserving the quality of Lake Champlain. That cannot be accomplished as long as we continue to piecemeal destroy the ability of limited conservation zones to operate as vehicles for water conservation. The Comprehensive plan recommends the maintenance of UNDISTURBED conservation zones along major, minor streams as well as well defined streams and tributaries such as the Fayette stream. The Comprehensive Plan states that "Erosion control, or lack of it, is the most significant factor affecting stream water quality in South Burlington". It goes on to say that "effective erosion control measures include hay bale dams, silt fences and well vegetated stable banks". This bank does not appear to be well vegetated and stable. TO: City Manager and Planning Commission FROM: Natural Resources Committee DATE: 30 October 1995 RE: L&M Partnership Sketch Plan Application and continued violation of conservation zone. The Natural Resources Committee is concerned about the continued violation of the conservation zone behind the L&M Park facility. Upon re -measuring the distance from the center of the stream to the closest edge of the parking lot curb, we found a distance of 30 horizontal feet. Topsoil has been spread on the crushed rock that was applied to stabilize the bank. Grass is growing, but soil is eroding over the areas where the crushed rock was buried. There doesn't seem to be enough soil to support grass on that slope. The bank closest to the parking lot is actively eroding. If the violation is not rectified, and the bank slope contoured to a more stable configuration, the bank will probably become a hazard to the parking lot. On 28 April 1995 the committee indicated the concerns we had. We continue to have those concerns. In addition we are concerned about the possibility of damage not being repaired. Please find a copy of the 28 April 1995 memo attached. PLANNING COMMISSION 14 March 1995 page 4 lawj3069WWilliston Road, -South Burlinot Site Plan"_preparedWbvWMichael Dugan A2 revision date of 3/1/95, with the follo� 1. All previous approvalsand stipulations which are not fuoer- sedgd by_LLLs_2pprovaL shall remain in effect. the 3. The site elan shall_ be revised to show the changes listed below and shall re l2re approval of the Cit Planner: a. The site plan shall be revised to chan e the front yard coverage information to correctly reflect the 55.8% coverage. b. The site plan.shall_ be revisedtoremove the sidewalk along the ro ert 's frontage. 4. Three copies�of the_ _plans_ incorporatinq the revisions stated_ above_ shall be submitted to the City Planner within 30 days of this approval. 5. The -site i� mprovements required under the 1/26/93 approval (i.er__expand parkin _ orea, alter access drive, arestripe parking lot) shall be completed by June 1, 1995. 6. The applicant shall_ obtain a_Certificate of Occu anc C pom- 1Lance from �the �Administrative Officer,_upon completion of all site improvements. 7. Any change to the approved site plan shall require Plannin Commission approval. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Sketch plan application of L&M Partnership to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 sq. ft. movie theatre (1000 seats), a 22,500 sq. ft. restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3500 sq. ft. restaurant with drive - through service and a bank with drive -through service, located on Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of modifications to parking layout and landscaping: Mr. Sheahan stepped down due to a potential conflict of interest. Mr Beldock said some changes were made necessitated by things found during construction. PLANNING COMMISSION 14 March 1995 page 5 A timber stair on the side of the building wasn't on the original plan. Customers wanted an easier way to get to the restaurant, and they were walking through the landscaping. Mr. Burgess noted these changes have already been made without approval. Mr. Beldock said the Fire Dept. and Dept. of Labor and Industry also required a second egress from the children's center. Then they found that they needed 2 dumpsters instead of one. In addition, the 63 ft. curb cut didn't allow enough turn radius for the average size car. The curb cut was thus moved 12 ft. to the east. (Mr. Beldock noted the drawing is 2-3 ft. off and will be revised) - Mr. Weith said there is a 50 ft. CO zone along the stream. The plan showed everything out of that zone. When constructed, part of the lot is in the CO Zone. Natural Resources Committee is reviewing this. Mr. Beldock also noted the site plan on record was slightly inaccurate as it showed the road further to the south. Mr. Burgess said that by definition a site plan can't be inaccurate. It's what the applicant asked for and what was approved. Mr. Beldock said the survey was done after the site plan. Mr. Weith noted the back entrance to the garage was shifted and the island is bigger than shown on the plan. Mr. Beldock said the most significant change is that the number of parking spaces is now 493 and the approved plan calls for 489. The bank is to build 3 more for a total of 496. The problem is that the interior spaces are substandard. Mr Beldock felt this wasn't a problem as all were occupied this week and tenants are happy with them. Mr. Burgess noted that 489 spaces represented a shortfall of 22%. He was not convinced that substandard parking spaces are acceptable. Mr. Beldock said they can remove some spaces and make them standard and still have the 489 approved spaces. Mr. Weith said the approved spaces were standard. Mr. Weith noted that when the residential units were approved, the applic-nt submitted standards for parking and the Commission approved 8-1/2 ft. spaces. He recommended 8-1/2 ft. spaces with a 22 ft. aisle. The aisle is now less than 22 ft. Mr. Teeson said the Commission was sold a bill of goods on stacked parking. Now it is being told the scale was off. He said he was not comfortable with what is happening. PLANNING COMMISSION 14 March 1995 page 6 Mr. Beldock said he didn't feel the stacked parking was needed. He felt there can be 8-1/2 ft. spaces that work. Mr. Burgess said the problem is that the plan approved was predicated on shared parking. There is now a sign at MacDonalds that says their parking is exclusive. This is no longer shared parking. Mr. Iandoli of Cactus Pete's said the sign is illegal. Mr. Weith said Larkin and Milot won't do anything about the situation because they know the city won't come after them. Ms. Barone said the substandard parking spaces in the under - building lot will keep her from ever going back there again. She said she could not maneuver her car in and out of the spaces. Mr. Austin said he will not approve any plan as long as the sign is still up at MacDonald's. He felt there should be 489 spaces that meet the city standards. Messrs. Teeson and Crow agreed. Ms. Julian, a resident at Larkin Terrace said there is parking up and down the street all the time. They have parked at MacDonald's and had their car towed away. Ms. Snyder of Natural Resources Committee said 6 spaces encroach on the CO Zone and the dumpster is in the CO Zone. She said it may look like a minor encroachment but it is another piece of a natural resource being taken away. Mr. Austin said he would like to see parking spaces outside the CO Zone and the dumpster as well. Messrs. Teeson and Crow agreed. Mr. Burgess summarized the Commission's feelings: There should be 489 parking spaces with shared parking assured. The parking spaces should all be standard size with none of them in the CO Zone. The dumpaters should also be out of the CO Zone. Mr. Sheahan rejoined the Commission. 6. Site plan application of Dorset St. Beverage to expand a convenience store use and a pizza restaurant (fast food) with take-out and delivery into 672 sq. ft. of vacant space. The convenience store would expand from 3264 sq. ft. to 3600 sq. ft. and the restaurant from 864 sq. ft. to 1200 sq. ft. and add 12 seats for a total of 22 seats, 364 Dorset St: Mr. Kennedy said a tenant has moved out and the 2 remaining tenants would divide the space. They will enlarge the deli L i +-ch(,,�, -- --- i r l»r.lr mho r�i �� n r-,l nr,o cui l l nisi i n F, mnrs� hnnt-h� _ psi ��. aa�ia ui�u iaa .. u.. .�. i.... L.�.., .. .,. Nam.. ...... .... .. ...�� r.. ... �.. .. .......��. ... .. ... `._...._ Mr. Weith said there is a gate separating the front and back PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCI)y i, INC. The Maltex Building 431 Pine Street - Suite #20 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401-4726 TEL (802) 658-5588 FAX (802) 658-3629 TO or WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION RE: gee ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 IAL $ S -- 6 9 rok N K �• THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval For your use As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit ❑ Submit _ ❑ Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US ° I: u COPY TO SIG If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIAj 1, INC. The Maltex Building 431 Pine Street - Suite #20 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401-4726 TEL (802) 658-5588 FAX (802) 658-3629 TO WE ARE SENDING YOU )(Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints 11Plans El Copy of letter ❑ El Change order �\ [LIE U( --� @1P T m ° maouu%l DATE 3 -7 � JOB NO. Z ATTENTI ='r 2 RE: ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. �D,ES�CRIPTION l..i-%E`j LPN-�-1 A � R E C El' V t u THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval For your use As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections n ❑ Resubmit ❑ Submit ❑ Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints ❑ FORBIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 66)"I4 C-Jk-,IS : l 1 1?12C 4 CL4-6 0y ` /A->J� COPY TO � �-' f✓ t-��— / SIGNED: H enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 February 26, 1996 Nancy Knox Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc. 431 Pine Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site Modifications, 7 Fayette Road Dear Ms. Knox: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from Fire Chief Wally Possich. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc ely, Zay�mZndllJ. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls cc: Gregg Beldock M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Wallace Possich, South Burlington Fire Chief Re: Plans Reviewed for March 19, 1996 Agenda Date: February 27, 1996 I have reviewed the following site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. Subdivision Plan/Martin Dated 2/15/96 Spear Street Project No. 96018 Acceptable 2. L&M Park (Plan A) Dated 2/9/96 Fayette Road Project No. 7221 Acceptable 3. L&M Park (Plan B) Dated 2/9/96 Fayette Road Project No. 7221 Acceptable 4. Ben & Jerry's Dated 2/16/96 Kimball Avenue Acceptable, except adequate water and hydrant plans are required. 5. Pizzeria Uno Dated 2/23/96 1330 Shelburne Road Project No. 7226 Acceptable PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 February 26, 1996 Nancy Knox Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc. 431 Pine Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site Modifications, 7 Fayette Road Dear Ms. Knox: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and myself. Comments from Fire Chief Wally Possich will be forwarded when they are available. Please respond to these comments with addition information and/or revised plans no later than Friday, March 8, 1996. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely,_ Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls cc: Gregg Beldock M E M O R A N D U M To: Applicants/Project Files From: Raymond J. Belair,,. ning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, March 19, 1996 Agenda Items Date: February 26, 1996 GREGG BELDOCK - SITE MODIFICATIONS - SKETCH PLAN - ✓ plan B is short one (1) parking space. --- there is currently a dumpster located outside the dumpster enclosure and several trash containers lined up against the building. All these containers should be placed behind the screened enclosure. --- the plan should be revised to reflect the new curb constructed adjacent to the dumpster behind the bank building. -'�- provide one (1) additional full sized copy of each plan in addition to an 1111x 17" reduction of each plan. - the two (2) parallel spaces on plan A located under the building at the northwest corner are substandard. Parallel spaces must be at least 22 feet in length. Revised final plat: -- provide overall coverage information. --- provide "as -built" landscaping plan. HERBERT & JOAN MARTIN - 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN --- plan should show the size and location of the existing water line along Swift Street and the service to the house. TRUEX CULLINS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS - LIGHT MANUFACTURING TO OFFICE -SITE PLAN Site plan should be revised to include the following information: --- the site plan should include the entire lot, not just a small portion. --- the minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $17,000. Plan should show all existing landscaping and proposed landscaping with a value of $17,000. Plan should include a planting schedule. �ELD06,I� Memorandum - Planning March 14, 1995 agenda items March 10, 1995 Page 2 30%). Overall coverage is 39.3% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 55.8% (maximum allowed is 30%). The front yard coverage information on the plan should be revised to correctly reflect the 55.8% coverage. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement for this project is $1800. The previously approved plan showed a row of 10 six (6) foot White Pine trees along the easterly boundary, shrubs along the front of the property and some shrubs south of the expanded parking lot. The applicant does not wish to plant any additional landscaping and is seeking a credit for existing trees which are estimated to have an $8850 value. Staff recommends that some landscaping be installed in particular along the east property line. Parking: The approved plan required that the parking lot be expanded to the south and the parking layout be revised as shown on the plan. These parking improvements have not been made. Sidewalk: Condition 6b of the 1/26/93 approval required that a sidewalk be constructed along the property's frontage. The applicant has instead paid the city a sidewalk impact fee. The sidewalk should be removed from the plan since it will not be constructed by the applicant. 5) L&M PARTNERSHIP - SITE REVISIONS - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of making site revisions in the vicinity of the restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building. Staff discovered that site revisions were made without approval from the Planning Commission and requested the applicant seek approval for these revisions. The last amendment approved was on 8/9/94 (minutes enclosed). Access/circulation: The 8/9/94 approval involved adding a second access to the underground parking area and widening the curb cut from 27 feet to 63 feet. Staff measured this curb cut after construction to be approximately 100 feet in width. The City Planner and City Engineer agreed to allow the curb cut to be reduced to approximately 75 feet in width subject to approval from the Planning Commission. Staff recommends a 75 foot wide curb cut as the turning radius is quite tight with only a 63 foot wide curb - cut. Temporary concrete bumpers are now in place until spring at 2 Memorandum - Planning March 14, 1995 agenda items March 10, 1995 Page 3 which time the permanent curb will be installed. Sketch plan still shows this curb at its originally approved location (i.e., 63 feet). The revised final plat should show the curb cut as requested (i.e., 75 feet). Coverage/setbacks: Commercial portion of L&M Park project: Building coverage is 65,276 square feet (maximum allowed is 125, 453 square feet). Overall coverage appears to have increased since the last approval. This information was requested but not submitted. This information should be submitted for revised final plat. The plan submitted shows the building moved 2-3 feet closer to the street than the last approved plan. The building scales to be 32 feet from the Fayette Road r.o.w. at its closest point. Parking: The original approval required a total of 489 parking spaces for the commercial portion of the P.U.D., eleven (11) of which were to consist of stacked parking units which allow for cars to be stacked one above the other. The 489 spaces represented a waiver of 22%, however, a shared parking analysis conducted by the applicant indicated that the peak parking demand for the mix of uses in the development would be 489 vehicles. Therefore, 489 spaces were approved. The parking was not constructed exactly as shown on the approved plan. Areas which differ from the approved plan include the northern portion of the underground parking garage and the parking area located on the west side of the retail/restaurant building. Also, the eleven (11) stacking units were never installed. The total number of constructed spaces is 493. Approximately 31 spaces located in the northern portion of the underground parking garage are substandard in terms of required dimensions. If standard size spaces are installed, it appears only 20 spaces will fit. This represents a total of 482 parking spaces for the commercial portion, or a 7 space shortfall from the required 489 spaces shown to be needed in the shared parking analysis. Staff recommends that standard sized spaces (i.e., 8.5' x 18' with 22' aisles) be installed in the northern portion of the underground parking garage. The Planning Commission should decide whether to grant an additional 7 space waiver or require the installation of seven (7) stacking units. The parking area on the west side was expanded into the C.O. 3 Memorandum - Planning March 14, 1995 agenda items March 10, 1995 Page 4 District. Encroachment into the C.O. District is permitted as long as it will not significantly affect adversely the attributes provided in Section 3.503(a) -(e) of the zoning regulations. The Natural Resources Committee will be asked to comment on this encroachment at their 3/16/95 meeting. The plan should show the bike rack at McDonald's. Landscaping: The revised final plat plan should include an "as - built" landscaping plan. Dumsters: The dumpster storage area has been increased in size and has yet to be screened as required. Signage plan: The applicant is not in compliance with the signage plan required by the 8/9/94 approval (condition #6). The required signage has not been installed. Other: The parking area located behind the bank needs to be constructed as shown on the plan. As described above, the parking plan for the development as approved is based on a shared parking situation. McDonald's has recently installed a sign which indicates that the parking area near the McDonald's is for the sole use of McDonald's customers. This sign is in violation of the approval and is in contradiction to the shared parking analysis. This sign should be removed. 6) DORSET STREET BEVERAGE - INTERNAL USE CHANGES - SITE PLAN This project consists of expanding a convenience store use and a pizza restaurant (fast food) with take-out and delivery into 672 square feet of vacant space. The convenience store would expand from 3,264 square feet to 3600 square feet and the restaurant from 864 square feet to 1200 square feet and add 12 seats for a total of 22 seats. This parcel also contains an additional building used for a contracting business (Munson Earth Moving) and a real estate business (South Burlington Realty). The last review of this site by the Planning Commission was on 3/8/94 when the restaurant was originally approved (minutes enclosed). This property located at 364 Dorset Street lies within the CD2 4 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: March 26, 1996 Agenda Items Date: February 16, 1996 L&M PARK - SHELBURNE ROAD There exists a street light within the conservation zone which will also have to be moved. Plans should show where it will be relocated. MARTIN SUBDIVISION - SWIFT/SPEAR STREET 1. The subdivision should include a 30'x 30' triangle at the intersection of Swift and Spear Street to allow for future street improvements especially a sidewalk. The corner as it now exists is almost at the edge of the pavement. 2. A 24 inch water main exists along the south side of Swift Street. It should be shown. BEN & JERRY'S - DIGITAL PLANT - KIMBALL AVENUE Plans should show water and sewer services and include a north arrow. G r e g g B e I d o c k February 13, 1996 Joe Weith City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 7 Fayette Drive Dear Joe: Nancy Knox has forwarded to you (2) two site plans for 7 Fayette Drive. I believe the property is best served by PLAN -A. Please review the plans and let me know what you think. Yours truly, Greg r,. eld k f 2117 Dorset Street • Shelburne, Vermont 05482 9 (802) 985-9446 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. owner of record Gregg Beldock Tel. 862-8438 1525 Shelburne Road Fax 862-0086 So. Burlington, VT 05403 -/ 7/ % b. Applicant c. Contact person Nancy Knox Tel. 658-5588 431 Pine St. Pinkham Engineering Assoc. Inc. Maltex Building Burlington, VT 05401 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including_ number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). L & M Pare 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) One hurdred v ar lease from T. & M 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties As noted on previous annlications 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. N/A 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. NIA 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Corrmission which affect the proposed sub- division, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) 'Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. S) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. (Signaturc-) r cunta t jx.r�c)n---------- REVE'" m3m C4 sts''O.,wROW PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIA( INC. The Maltex Building 431 Pine Street - Suite #20 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401-4726 TEL (802) 658-5588 FAX (802) 658-3629 WE ARE SENDING YOU XAttached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings LPrints ElPlans ElCopy of letter Change order ❑ KRUW -� 0IF VE° H11�316INUL°- 1L DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION 01 RE: L-4- ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ST $ -s LrrlUD8 l THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval For your use As requested ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections For review and comment ❑ ❑ Resubmit ❑ Submit ❑ Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints [I FORBIDS D11E 19 El PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKI` 21 i %u " 1� r COPY TO Cam/' C—,Mf5t SIGNED: 7�z7/� If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Gregg B e I d o c k November 3, 1995 Bill Burgess Coburn and Feeley 205 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Bill: As you know the issues surrounding the 7 Fayette Road site plan still remain outstanding, according to Joe Weith and Ray Belair. After reviewing the "outstanding issues" with my attorney, a traffic engineer, and a number of civil engineers, I believe the issues are not only minimal and defensible, but ameliorated with a brush stroke. The Planning Commission holds that brush. The issues in question are these: 1) Regarding the C.O. Zone: * Is the curb and portions of six parking spaces infringing upon the "C.O. Zone" ? * If so, the area was paved when I took over the site. Who's responsibility is it to move the V� spaces? * Is the curb and paved area created by the parking in fact minimizing erosion? * Where is the center of this meandering stream? * Isn't the Town best served by the plan as it now exists? * Does the Nature Conservation Committee actually think t am going to allow this stream, which is actually road runoff, to meander until it undermines my footings? * -I cleaned up -an eye sore; row it looks -like a -stream.. Does anyone give me credit for my , efforts? 2) The garage opening is 4 feet North of where it was shown on a plan submitted without my prior knowledge,(a plan accepted by the Town without my acknowledgement or notification) by the landowner. A safety issue resulted in the opening moving to the North. If the Town wants the West stair removed, notify the State, sign a waiver accept full liability jointly and severally fo j an damages resulting to human life b limiting the State's recommended egress, and than I will Y g � Y g g remove the stair and saw cut the wall allowing more room for parking out of the C.O. Zone. a y� 6 3) Some aisle widths are questionable in the garage. My engineers say that garage affords more room for egress and ingress than any garage in the entire state! My architect submitted, in 1c writing, the widths of the spaces. They were approved by Joe Weith; they work; let's be - intelligent reasonable people! 1" \ 13,9- Jr 2117 Dorset Street 9 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 • (802) 985-9446 The ball is in the Planning Commission's court. My layout and site plan make sense; it is in the public's best interest. I can and will prove that my efforts and their results are as close to the original plan as was possible and reasonable. Frankly, mountains have been made of mole hills. I will follow your lead. Please let me know what you would like to see occur. Perhaps the money it would cost me to dig up the spaces could be put towards a South Burlington High Scholarship fund. Obviously I am annoyed by this constant nuisance. However, I would like to work with you and the Planning Commission on this and future projects. Finally, I recognize that Joe and Dick Ward are simply following up on outstanding issues until we reach a resolve. Frankly, they have both been helpful and remain so. Unfortunately Ray Belair's attitude and treatment of me is unacceptable. I am a taxpayer, a pretty damn big taxpayer. Ray works for me. It's about time he started acting like it! He will not even acknowledge my change of address notification! I am looking forward to your comments and suggestions on this matter. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 Mr. Gregg Beldoc Jiffy Lube 1525 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: L&M Park Property, Fayette Road Dear Mr. Beldoc: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 December 6, 1995 The Planning Commission discussed your letter dated November 3, 1995 regarding "outstanding issues" at the above referenced property. You state in your letter that you want the Planning Commission to tell you what it would like to see occur. Basically, the Commission would like to see you do one of two options, the same options which have been explained to you in the past. The first option is to correct the violations by rebuilding the project in conformance with the approved plans. The second option is to obtain approval from the Commission (i.e., site plan and subdivision) for the changes reflected in what was actually constructed. The second option requires submitting new plans showing any and all changes to the original plans which you would like approved. Please note that there is no guarantee that the new plans will be approved. They will only be approved if the Planning Commission finds them to be in conformance with the City's standards and regulations. The submission of new plans will require a minimum of two (2) hearings - sketch plan review and a revised final plat hearing. The revised plans should show the entire commercial portion of the development as this project was reviewed and approved as a planned unit development. Please contact City Planner, Joe Weith, for guidance on the exact procedural and submission requirements. I would like to respond to several other statements contained in your letter. First, you claim that you are annoyed by this constant nuisance. This so called constant nuisance was caused by whoever was in charge who allowed a building and parking areas to be constructed which are not in conformance with approved plans. Secondly, you suggest that it is the responsibility of the City to accept liability when a private development does not comply with certain state permits. We strongly disagree with such a statement. Mr. Gregg Beldoc December 6, 1995 Page 2 It is the responsibility of whoever is improving land to make sure all necessary permits and regulations are complied with. Third, you claim that the City approved a plan without your acknowledgement or notification. While the City makes attempts to notify all interests in a certain property, we admit we are not always successful in doing so. Regardless, the ultimate responsibility in whatever happens to a particular piece of property rests on those who have legal interest, not the City. Finally, the Commission does not appreciate your statements regarding Ray Belair. It is our understanding that Mr. Belair has proceeded to notify you of your violations in a standard and professional manner. If you have documented proof that says otherwise I suggest you take it up with the City Manager. This is not a Planning Commission issue. The South Burlington Planning Commission would like to see this issue resolved. If neither option described above is chosen, the City will have no choice but to pursue this issue through whatever means is allowed by State Statute. If you decide to choose -the second option described above, we suggest you submit plans and a Sketch Plan application form by the first of the year. Sincerely, W^,- �(� William L. Burgess, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission cc: Charles Hafter Joe Weith Gerald Milot John Larkin City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 14, 1995 Steven Stitzel, Esquire Stitzel & Page, P.C. 171 Battery Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning Violation, 7 Fayette Road Dear Steve: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of a Notice of Violation sent to Gregg Beldock on July 18, 1995 and his response dated August 3, 1995. I notified Mr. Beldock that there were problems with his site on November 29, 1994 (see enclosed). He came before the Planning Commission on March 14, 1995 for sketch plan review (minutes enclosed) and has not returned for final approval. I spoke to Chuck about this matter and he gave me the OK to have you get involved. Would you please write to him and see if you can get him to make the site changes to comply with the approved plan or obtain approval for a revised plan. Since it has been more than six (6) months since the sketch plan review he would need another sketch plan review before proceeding to final plat approval. If you have any questions, please give 11) me a call. Sincerely, RaymdrWJ. Belair, Zoni and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp TO: City Manager and Planning Commission FROM: Natural Resources Committee DATE: 30 October 1995 RE: L&M Partnership Sketch Plan Application and continued violation of conservation zone. The Natural Resources Committee is concerned about the continued violation of the conservation zone behind the L&M Park facility. Upon re -measuring the distance from the center of the stream to the closest edge of the parking lot curb, we found a distance of 30 horizontal feet. Topsoil has been spread on the crushed rock that was applied to stabilize the bank.. Grass is growing, but soil is eroding over the areas where the crushed rock was buried. There doesn't seem to be enough soil to support grass on that slope. The bank closest to the parking lot is actively eroding. If the violation is not rectified, and the bank slope contoured to a more stable configuration, the bank will probably become a hazard to the parking lot. On 28 April 1995 the committee indicated the concerns we had. We continue to have those concerns. In addition we are concerned about the possibility of damage not being repaired. Please find a copy of the 28 April 1995 memo attached. TO: Planning commission FROM: Natural Resources Committee DATE: 28 April 1995 RE: Response to April 23, 1995 Memo from Griffin International regarding CO Zone encroachment at Banana's University Project 7 Fayette Drive, South Burlington As previously stated in our memo of April 28, 1995, the Natural Resources Committee made the following recommendations: 1. Regarding the dumpsters: Keep the dumpsters out of the CO Zone. Construct a containment area of material, that is more durable than wooden trellis. 2. Regarding the Parking lot: Move the parking area out of the CO Zone. Adjust the bank grade to a more stable configuration and restore the natural vegetation, a combination of grasses and shrubs. 3. Regarding the Area behind the Discovery Zone building: Stabilize the area between the building and stream by restoring natural vegetation of grasses and shrubs. In addition, we feel that it is necessary to have a more accurate depiction of the center -line of the stream. The encroachment that we observed included two dumpsters encroaching in the CO Zone. One located in a wooden enclosure with a locking gate. The other dumpster was outside the containment area with no fence around it. The parking spaces in question were found to be well within the CO Zone. A measure of fifty feet from the center -line of the stream found the CO Zone to end at approximately the center -line of the road that leads to the underground parking. The Natural Resources.Committee measured the distance from the stream center -line to the parking lot curb as 33 feet. This does not agree with the measurements made by Griffin International. We would like a site visit to clarify the confusion. The stream is described in that it is perennial. It is very probably fed in large part by a perennial wet area behind orchard School which is up slope. The stream is possibly carrying storm water from storm drains. The origin of this storm water is parking lots, streets, roof, and residential runoff. The geometry of the stream does indicate a southerly migration meander pattern. This is in part a strong argument for not allowing encroachment into the CO Zone. From an engineering standpoint, if the parking spaces are left as is they will be undercut that much sooner, requiring stream bank and parking lot maintenance in the form of bank stabilization. Streams erode and deposit. This is a truth that cannot be changed by ordinance. We can change by engineering tactics the pattern of erosion and deposition. This -much is clear. The unclear piece is what happens after stabilization. In "stabilizing" the bank we only shift the erosion/deposition patterns down stream, making it someone else's problem. This is can be demonstrated in large scale projects as the Achafalaya River in Louisiana and in smaller scale as in the Potash Brook. We are not concerned only with the Surface area from the 11900 square feet" encroachment. We are concerned with the following: -the future health of the stream -additive effect of CO Zone encroachment -increased impermeable areas that once allowed infiltration of surface waters as well as overland flow, and the additive effects of this -reduction of overland flow where surface water is renovated through contact with soil, flora and fauna, sediment reduction -erosion occurring now due to rain and wind on area of the bank where there is no vegetation. -contained disregard for protecting steams and wetlands and CO Zones that serve multiple purposes store and slowly release storm water surface runoff renovation aesthetic value lost wildlife habitat surface waters run into Lake Champlain. By international agreement we are committed to improving and preserving the quality of Lake Champlain. That cannot be accomplished as long as we continue to piecemeal destroy the ability of limited conservation zones to operate as vehicles for water conservation. The Comprehensive plan recommends the maintenance of UNDISTURBED conservation zones along major, minor streams as well as well defined streams and. tributaries such as the Fayette stream. The Comprehensive Plan states that "Erosion control, or lack of it, is the most significant factor affecting stream water quality in South Burlington". It goes on to say that "effective erosion control measures include hay bale dams, silt fences and well vegetated stable banks". This bank does not appear to be well vegetated and stable. TO: City Manager and Planning Commission FROM: Natural Resources Committee DATE: 30 October 1995 RE: L&M Partnership Sketch Plan Application and continued violation of conservation zone. The Natural Resources Committee is concerned about the continued violation of the conservation zone behind the L&M Park facility. Upon re -measuring the distance from the center of the stream to the closest edge of the parking lot curb, we found a distance of 30 horizontal feet. Topsoil has been spread on the crushed rock that was applied to stabilize the bank. Grass is growing, but soil is eroding over the areas where the crushed rock was buried. There doesn't seem to be enough soil to support grass on that slope. The bank closest to the parking lot is actively eroding. If the violation is not rectified, and the bank slope contoured to a more stable configuration, the bank will probably become a hazard to the parking lot. On 28 April 1995 the committee indicated the concerns we had. We continue to have those concerns. In addition we are concerned about the possibility of damage not being repaired. Please find a copy of the 28 April 1995 memo attached. TO: Planning Commission FROM: Natural Resources Committee DATE: 28 April 1995 RE: Response to April 23, 1995 Memo from Griffin International regarding CO Zone encroachment at Banana's University Project 7 Fayette Drive, South Burlington As previously stated in our memo of April 28, 1995, the Natural Resources Committee made the following recommendations: 1. Regarding the dumpsters: Keep the dumpsters out of the CO Zone. Construct a containment area of material that is more durable than wooden trellis. 2. Regarding the Parking lot: Move the parking area out of the CO Zone. Adjust the bank grade to a more stable configuration and restore the natural vegetation, a combination of grasses and shrubs. 3. Regarding the Area behind the Discovery Zone building: Stabilize the area between the building and stream by restoring natural vegetation of grasses and shrubs. In addition, we feel that it is necessary to have a more accurate depiction of the center -line of the stream. The encroachment that we observed included two dumpsters encroaching in the CO Zone. One located in a wooden enclosure with a locking gate. The other dumpster was outside the containment area with no fence around it. The parking spaces in question were found to be well within the CO Zone. A measure of fifty feet from the center -line of the stream found the CO Zone to end at approximately the center -line of the road that leads to the underground parking. The Natural Resources Committee measured the distance from the stream center -line to the parking lot curb as 33 feet. This does not agree with the measurements made by Griffin International. We would like a site visit to clarify the confusion. The stream is described in that it is perennial. It is very probably fed in large part by a perennial wet area behind Orchard School which is up slope. The stream is possibly carrying storm water from storm drains. The origin of this storm water is parking lots, streets, roof, and residential runoff. The geometry of the stream does indicate a southerly migration meander pattern. This is in part a strong argument for not allowing encroachment into the CO Zone. From an engineering standpoint, if the parking spaces are left as is they will be undercut that much sooner, requiring stream bank and parking lot maintenance in the form of bank stabilization. Streams erode and deposit. This is a truth that cannot be changed by ordinance. We can change by engineering tactics the pattern of erosion and deposition. This much is clear. The unclear piece is what happens after stabilization. In "stabilizing" the bank we only shift the erosion/deposition patterns down stream, making it someone else's problem. This is can be demonstrated in large scale projects as the Achafalaya River in Louisiana and in smaller scale as in the Potash Brook. We are not concerned only with the Surface area from the 11900 square feet" encroachment. We are concerned with the following: -the future health of the stream -additive effect of CO Zone encroachment -increased impermeable areas that once allowed infiltration of surface waters as well as overland flow, and the additive effects of this -reduction of overland flow where surface water is renovated through contact with soil, flora and fauna, sediment reduction -erosion occurring now due to rain and wind on area of the bank where there is no vegetation. -contained disregard for protecting steams and wetlands and CO Zones that serve multiple purposes store and slowly release storm water surface runoff renovation aesthetic value lost wildlife habitat surface waters run into Lake Champlain. By international agreement we are committed to improving and preserving the quality of Lake Champlain. That cannot be accomplished as long as we continue to piecemeal destroy the ability of limited conservation zones to operate as vehicles for water conservation. The Comprehensive plan recommends the maintenance of UNDISTURBED conservation zones along major, minor streams as well as well defined streams and tributaries such as the Fayette stream. The Comprehensive Plan states that "Erosion control, or lack of it, is the most significant factor affecting stream water quality in South Burlington". It goes on to say that "effective erosion control measures include hay bale dams, silt fences and well vegetated stable banks". well vegetated and stable. This bank does not appear to be 1� -; I.A.-ROU K CORP011,A,110N August 3, 199" Raymond Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Alleged Zoning Violations at 7 Fayette Road Gentlemen: I am in receipt of your letter dated July 18, 1995. 1 received the letter on July 29, 1995 because it was sent to my home in stead of my offices, in the future please forward all information to my offices, as I have requested in the past. In reference to that letter I offer the following- 1). 1 have not commenced any additional development on the aforementioned property. 2). There are in fact seven (7) parking spaces partially infringing upon the C.O. zone. As the attached letter from a hydrologist suggests, those spaces do not at -feet the erosion or habitat of the C.O. Zone. In fact, the erosion factor has been somewhat eradicated by the stability provided by the concrete curb and the curb's effect upon moving the water to the west of the sloped area. In addition, the C.O. Zone was paved, obstructed and full of debris when I began construction; I have only improved the appearance and flow of that C.O. Zone. it is my intention to meet with the Conservation Committee and discuss, one more time, the efforts that I have and will continue to make to preserve the area in question. In the event that this discussion is futile, I will move the I redesigning curb to the south and reconfigure that portion of the parking lot Obviously r e d signin that area will result in six(6) less parking spaces and a less advantageous layout for the patrons using the facility. Furthermore, I currently have a contract with Servicemaster to clean the stream bed of debris from Fayette Road all the way to Vermont National Bank; I provide this service to the community but will no longer be able to dedicate my resources toward that end if I must dedicate them to yet another change in this parking lot. 3). There are two (2) bike racks at the facility. The bike racks are not where they are shown on the plan and I apologize for that. However, we have placed the racks in more utilitarian areas. When j submit the amended site plan tc)The Planning (7orn-mission I will be sure to include the location of the bike racks. 4). Currently my portion of the L&M Park P.U.D. has more parking spaces than originally shown on the site plan. Pinkham Engineering is reviewing the parking areas and we will submit a new, final plan for The Planning Commission's review. 5). The curb cut on Fayette Road is exactly where Bill Szymanski and I marked it on the ground last Spring. The submissions reviewed by the Planning Commission were not made available to me prior to the 8/9/94 Planning Commission Meeting. Those approvals were granted to L&M Partnership. The curb cut shown on that plan is too narrow and the turn too sharp for many vehicles; both Joe Wyeth and Bill Szymanski are aware of this issue. 6). We have constructed a pretty fancy dumpster area but raccoons, neighbors, homeless people and the tenants themselves are not always so respectful of the area. We regularly police the area and have a contract with ServiceMaster to maintain the grounds free of debris. 7). After our report from our traffic engineers is completed we will submit a revised sketch plan U 9/7/95 PRELIMINARY COMMENTS ON REVISED L&M PARK PLAN 1. Two parallel parking spaces located near back dumpster not required 22' long. Appears they can be extended. 2. Curb cut to rear parking area and underground parking does not appear to reflect as -built conditions. 3. 483 spaces being provided, 489 approved. Will require a waiver of 6 additional spaces. 4. Revised final plat application will require submittal of a revised landscape plan which reflects as -built conditions. 5. Overall coverage calculations need to be recalculated. 6. Should submit a better quality print. 7. Applicant should note that revised final plat application needs to be submitted within 6 months of sketch plan review, or will need to submit new sketch plan application. (lmpark) Gregg BeIdock August 21, 1995 Bill Burgess Coburn and Feeley Real Estate 205 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Bill: As you are well aware, The City of South Burlington is concerned over variations in the as built condition versus the approved site plan conditions at 7 Fayette Road. The reasons for the few variations are many; in my opinion all justifiable and not done with any malintent but nevertheless, they are "charges". In their words, and apparently predisposed viewpoint of Ray Belair, all charges are violations. I recognize that I can effectuate many of the changes necessary to bring "my portion" of the P,U.D. onto compliance. Those areas of the P.U.D. not under my control, not within the boundaries of my lease, I can no longer continue to speak for Toward that end I have enclosed herewith a note and sketch done by Pinkham Engineering. To synopsize months of conversations with both Pinkham Engineering and Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn and the hydro -geologists at Heindel and Noyes as well as Griffin International I offer the following: 1) The spaces in the garage fall in between columns; we have maximized the space between the immovable structure. All spaces and aisles are now within the South Burlington requirements for underground parking. Furthermore, despite unfounded allegations and accusations at a prior public meeting, the underground garage at 7 Fayette Road is the most accessible, least obstructed, "roomiest" underground structure in Chittenden County. We went and measured every one of th,-m. In addition, pursuant to Ray and Joe Weith's requests, we have removed a number of perfectly good, however irregularly sized spaces. 2) The few feet of C.O. Zone upon which some paving has infringed was previously covered by rip -rap paving, construction debris, and general refuse. The stream bank was eroding and both bank and stream were filled with heavy debris and garbage. Currently, no erosion is occurring and we have hired a company to walk and clean the stream and bank bi-monthly. What a difference! Now it looks like a conservation zone. Is that the work of "another sleazy developer"? That's the phrase used, it's on tape, by a member of the Planning Board during our last meeting. However, if I must move the paving and curb six feet (6) to the South, thereby giving up seven (7) parking spaces currently providing convenience to patrons, I will do so. We are talking about very little expense.. but why loose the parking? Also, I remind all involved I am not responsible to keep that C.O. Zone clean and unobstructed; it's costing me a bloody fortune! 2117 Dorset Street • Shelburne, Vermont 05482 9 (802) 985-9446 3) We should arrange a walk or meeting for five (5) minutes on site to look at these issues. What is good for the project happens to be good for the City. The truth is, if I take out the parking in the area in question I still have almost enough parking for the project, my portion of the P.U.D., to come into compliance with the original approvals. But why jerk around stuffing in three (3) of four (4) spaces if its not the best placement or use for the patrons? I will be happy to take the money and put in a Scholarship fund at South Burlington High School. The issue is principals not dollars. Please contact me to discuss this matter or hopefully, to meet for a few minutes on site. Joe Weith FINK-14AM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers + Planners :• Landscape Architects •: Surveyors August 10, 1995 Mr. Gregg Beldock 1525 Shelburne Road South Burlington VT 05403 TEE: 7 Fayette Road Project Dear Gregg; As a follow up to our telephone conversation on Monday, I have reviewed the parking situation at the site, and have prepared the following update of my previous letter: 1. As you know, the seven parking spaces and dumpster area west of the parking garage encroach on the Conservation and Open Space zone. The City will require you to relocate the dumpsters and fence and tear up the asphalt, and restore the slope and vegetation, as we discussed. You could fight it but I think this would be a waste of your time and money. I have looked at this area more closely and have concluded that the required drive width (24') will not leave enough room for any parallel spaces here (see attached sketch). You could request a waiver for the drive width, but there isn't even enough room for a 16' drive and 10' for parallel spaces. Consequently you will lose 8 spaces now located in this area. 2. A permanent bike rack needs to be installed outside of Cactus Pete's. 3. The grease tank located outside the fence around the dumpsters needs to be moved behind the fence. 4. I reviewed the parking situation in the garage area and have shown the spaces I think will fit in the north end of the garage (see attached sketch). If you restripe this area as shown, you will have the maximum number possible, of the dimensions allowed by the City, and a parking area which should allow a reasonable amount of room for cars to circulate. I have compared the parking numbers on the revised sketch to the numbers on the approved plan: On site Garaee Total Approved Plan 114+ 11 * 56 181 Revised Plan 109 65 174** * 11= elevated spaces **Does not include any elevated parking spaces The Maltex Building v 431 Pine St.. Burlington, wr 05401 . Bus. (802) 658-5588 . Fax (802) 658-3629 `® I / ...• OR 7 f4,-V" ?4� Gregg B e I d o c k August 21, 1995 Bill Burgess Coburn and Feeley Real Estate 205 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Bill: As you are well aware, The City of South Burlington is concerned over variations in the as built condition versus the approved site plan conditions at 7 Fayette Road. The reasons for the few variations are many; in my opinion all justifiable and not done with any malintent but nevertheless, they are "charges". In their words, and apparently predisposed viewpoint of Ray Belair, all charges are violations. I recognize that I can effectuate many of the changes necessary to bring "my portion" of the P.U.D. onto compliance. Those areas of the P.U.D. not under my control, not within the boundaries of my lease, I can no longer continue to speak for Toward that end I have enclosed herewith a note and sketch done by Pinkham Engineering. To synopsize months of conversations with both Pinkham .Engineering and Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn and the hydro -geologists at Heindel and Noyes as well as Griffin International I offer the following: 1) The spaces in the garage fall in between columns; we have maximized the space between the immovable structure. All spaces and aisles are now within the South Burlington requirements for underground parking. Furthermore, despite unfounded allegations and accusations at a prior public meeting, the underground garage at 7 Fayette Road is the most accessible, least obstructed, "roomiest" underground structure in Chittenden County. We went and measured every one of th:m. In addition, pursuant to Rail and Joe Weith's requests, we have removed a number of perfectly good, however irregularly sized spaces. 2) The few feet of C.O. Zone upon which some paving has infringed was previously covered by rip -rap paving, construction debris, and general refuse. The stream bank was eroding and both bank and stream were filled with heawf debris and garbage. Currently, no erosion is occurring and we have hired a company to walk and clean the stream and bank bi-monthly. What a difference! Now it looks like a conservation zone. Is that the work of "another sleazy developer"? That's the phrase used, it's on tape, by a member of the Planning Board during our last meeting. However, if I must move the paving and curb six feet (6) to the South, thereby giving up seven (7) parking spaces currently providing convenience to patrons, I will do so. We are talking about very little expense, but why loose the parking? Also, I remind all involved I am not responsible to keep that C.O. Zone clean and unobstructed: it's costing me a bloody fortune! 2117 Dorset Street • Shelburne, Vermont 05482 • (802) 985-9446 3) We should arrange a walk or meeting for five (5) minutes on site to look at these issues. What is good for the project happens to be good for the City. The truth is, if I take out the parking in the area in question I still have almost enough parking for the project, my portion of the P.U.D., to come into compliance with the original approvals. But why jerk around stuffing in three (3) of four (4) spaces if its not the best placement or use for the patrons? I will be happy to take the money and put in a Scholarship fund at South Burlington High School. The issue is principals not dollars. Please contact me to discuss this matter or hopefully, to meet for a few minutes on site. Joe Weith r � 7 ILL � Aoult ",ems � �- l BULLROCK ATION August 3, 1995 Raymond Belair Zoning and Plarin, nil A,;Sistant 575 Dorset Street South Burlington. �'tirmont 0540 Re Alleged YOniq Violations at 7 Fayette Road Gentlemen W/ I am in receipt of,, out letter dated July IS, 1995. 1 received the letter on July 29. 1995 becat.lse it was 4ent to my h{ime in Stead of my c>f'Fees; in the future please forward all 'Information to my offices; as I haN e r•eclue,ted in the past in reference to that letter l offer the following 1), I have not c omirre aced any additional development on the aforementioned property 2). There are in fiwt revert (7) parking spaces partially infringing upon the C O. zone. As the attached letter" tronl a hr drologist suggests, those spaces do not affect the erosion or habitat of the C" 0 Gene In <<:ct, the erosion factor has been somewhat eradicated by the stability provided by the concrete curb MI(I the curb's ef'iect upon moving the water to the west of the sloped area In 'Addition, the C 0 70ric, was paved, obstructed and full of debris when I began construction, I have only improved the appearance and flow of that C O lone It is my intention to meet with the ConseiNation Committee and discus,, one more time, the offorts that. I have and will continue to make to preserve the area in question. In the event that this discussion is futile, I will move the curb to the: south and reconfigure that portion of the parking lot Obviously redesigning that area will result in si\(0) less parking=. spaces and a legs advantageous lavout for the patrons using the facility Furthermore Icurrently have a contract with Servicernaster to clean the stream bed of debris from 1=s.�,�!tte Rood all the ily to Vermont National Sank; I provide this service to the comnil.Wit} l)r tt ,ti all t e, lofiger be able to dedicate my resources toward that end ifI must dedicate thetn to Vet another thane in this parking lot 3) "There are tivc, (_') hike racks at the facility The bike racks are not where they are shown on the plan and i apoloLklze for that. However, we have placed the racks in more utilitarian areas. When I s tlir: ran ot:ded site pl,in to The Planning Conrin:rss:c,n 1 �v'lj t,e sure to include the location ot'rhz hike r:+ck I i) C.;rrentlti :tit, pvrti. n ,afille I. "vt Park p I_t D hay r.1c)re parl in ,paces than originally shown cm the �IiC plan n;nkharT' i"nzg'irieerii t !s ieviewing, the iPirG:;ntj arta4 i:nd k,ill Suhnlit a nev , filial plan for Tho Plansiir<; Commission's re"iew 5). The curb cut on Fayette Road is e\actly where Bid Szymanski and I marked it on the ground last Sprint; The iUhMisyions reviewed by the Planning Cc-mimisston were not made available to rile prior to the YX`N Planilin�; Commission Meeting; Those approvals were granted to L&M Partnership Thi ct;rtl Cut shown ail that plan is tot) narrow and tilt' turn too sharp for many vehicles, hoth .Ire "'teth and Hill Szymanski are aware of this issUe 6) We have co^stn cted a pretty fancy dumpster area but raccoons, neighbors, homeless people and the tenzrnts thenlsek s are not always so respectful, of the area. We regularly police the area and hay e a cons ract � ith ` or\ iceM aster to maintain tile _trounds free of debris 71) After, our report itom OUr traffic engineers is completed we will submit a re-,ised sketch plan toAc Planning Commission, Si trtry,=_ �-_ r~- BL LLROCK CORPORATION August 3, 1995 Raymond Belair Zoning and Planninu, V;sistant 575 Dorset Street South Burlirt_gton `Y �rmont 0,401 Re .alleged Zonlriv Violation,, at 7 Fayette Road Gentlemen I am in receipt c,F vrur letter dated July 18, 1995. 1 received the letter on Iuly 29, 1995 beCaLlSe it %vas cent to nw lionte in stead of rn, offEices: in the future please forward all information to my offices, as I ha\ e reclue,ted in the Past In reference to that letter i offer the following I) I have not cornminced any additional development on the aforementioned property ^) There arein 1zc;t >evv�n (7) parking spaces partial?Y ir,frinuing upon the C, O. zone As the attached letter frolll it hvdre�lUf;lst suggests, those: spaces do not affect the erosion or habitat of the C () Zane lrl nett. the erosion factor has been some%khat eradicated by the stability provided by the cottcrete curb and the curb's effect upon moving the water to the west of the slipped area In addition, the C () 7.one was paved, obstructed and full of debris when i began construction, I have only improved the appearance and flow of that C O Zone It is my intention to meet with the Cctn,et�ation Committee and discus, one more time, the efforts that i have and will continue to ,Make tc? preserve the area in question in the event that this discussion is filtile. I will move the curb to the south and reconfigdre that portion of the parking lot Obviously redesigning that area will result in �1'6 �; lz:s Parkin�l spaces and a less advantageous lavout for the patrons usi e the tscility C urthet nlor� I {:.urgently have a contract with Servicernaster to clean the stream bed of debris t1oni Fv.,,�tte Road -111 the tvay to Vermont National Bank, 1 Provide this service to the ionger be able to dedicate my resources t,:jward that end iFi must dedicate them to yet another :hanoe in this parking lot 3) 'There are t, co (' } hike racks at the facility The bike racks are not where they are shown on the plan and l il�.�ir+,ize for that However, we have placed the racks in more utilitarian areas When 1st►binit t lr ;;�,`�:r,41ed iti: pi3n t0 The Plannin`l Contn'ts".r;�n I tti•ii1 be sure to include the lo�;auort )t'the hike ack> 1 41 Current!, v; o:y > , w .he L.W1 Ps-k- P 1_' [D ha,: r ore i?are., i`; ;pai;e� than originally shown th_ city )Id,) P.r1'::�^ F:t��necrie.te.ving the f, ako), areii ind at "ill subs it a ne", tir'al plin ter iew 5) The :xrb c;;t cw Fiv:!re Road is e uctly where 8iil Sgmmnski ind I marked it on the ground last Sp6rig The suhAssions reviewed hx the Planning C,ammisslon .tiers not made available to me prior to the SA q4 Plannhg Commission Meeting Those approvals were granted to L&;�1 Panne sNp The cwh art shown on that plan is too narin)" and the aan too sharp Ar many vehicles, hoth , -e th \ eth and Bill S7.yT,t,atlskl are aware c,f this h) We We cov:tn:,: ed a pretty tang- dumpster area At r rcco��r:s, nei�hhors, homeless people and the tenants theriwkes are not always so reshectfu; of the area We regularly police the area and hake a cant Tact •wh Serk ice`,faster to maintain the vrounds free of debris 7) After our report from c ur tral is engineers is completed we will submit a re•,ised sketch plan 1tr►rssic�n, City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 29, 1994 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Requirements for Certificate of Occupancy, Bananas University Dear Mr. Beldock: The following is a list of improvements which must be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy at Bananas University. 1. Striping of underground parking spaces. 2.The removal of the floodlight in front of Vermont National Bank. 3. Continue sidewalk to cul-de-sac. 4. Installation of bike rack. 5. Reduce width of curb cut for second access to underground parking as per discussion with Joe Weith and Bill Szymanski. 6. Installation of the car stacking devices. In a related matter, it was discovered that three (3) parking spaces were added to the rear of the building wihtout approval from the Planning Commission. Please begin the applciation process to have the amended plan approved by the Planning Commission. This Gregg Beldock November 29, 1994 Page 2 revised plan should also include the increased width for the curb cut serving the second access to the underground parking. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinwely, 14 Ray2nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Dick Ward Gerry Milot John Larkin TO: Pl.anninq Commission F20m: Natural Resources Committee DATE: 28 April 1995 RE: Response to April 23, 1995 Memo from Griffin International regarding CO Zone encroachment at Banana's 'University Project 7 Fayette Drive, South Burlington As previously stated in our memo of April 28, -1-995, the Natural Resources Committee made the following recommendations: I. Regarding the dumpsters: Keep the dumpsters out of the CO Zone. Construct a containment area of material that is more 2. Regarding the Parking lot: Move the parking area out of the Co Zone. Adjust the bank grade to a more stable configuration and restore the natural vegetation, a combination of grasses and shrubs. 3. Regarding the Area behind the Discovery Zone building: Stabilize the area between the building and stream by restoring natural vegetation of grasses and shrubs. In addition, we feel that it is necessary to have a more accurate depiction of the center -line of the stream. The encroachment that we observed included two dumpsters encroaching in the CO Zone. one located in a wooden enclosure with a locking gate. The other dumpster was outside the containment area with no fence around it. The parking spaces in question were found to be well within the CO Zone. A measure of fifty feet from the center -line of the stream found the CO Zone f to end at approximately the center -line of the road that leads to the underground parking. The Natural Resources Committee measured the distance from the stream center -line to the parking lot curb as 33 feet. This does not agree with the measurements made by Griffin International. We would like a site visit to clarify the confusion. The stream is described in that it is perennial. it is very probably fed in large part by a perennial wet area behind Orchard School which is up slope. The stream is possibly carrying storm water from storm drains. The origin of this storm water is parking lots, streets, roof, and residential runoff. The geometry of the stream does indicate a southerly migration meander pattern. This is in part a strong argument for not allowing encroachment into the CO Zone. From an engineering standpoint, if the parking spaces are left as is they will be undercut that much sooner, requiring stream bank and parking lot maintenance in the form of bank stabilization. Streams erode and deposit. This is a truth that cannot be changed by ordinance. We can change by engineering tactics the pattern of erosion and deposition. This much, is clear. The unclear piece is what happens after stabilization. in "stabilizing" the bank we only shift the erosion/deposition patterns down stream, making it someone else's problem. This is can be demonstrated in large scale projects as the Achafalaya River in Louisiana and in smaller scale as in the Potash Brook. We are not concerned only with the Surface area from the 11900 square feet" encroachment. We are concerned. with the following: -the future health of the stream -additive effect of CO Zone encroachment -increased impermeable areas that once allowed infiltration of surface waters as well as overland flow, and the additive effects of this -reduction of overland flow where surface water is renovated through contact with soil, flora and fauna, sediment reduction -erosion occurring now due to rain and wind on area of the bank where there is no vegetation. -contained disregard for Protecting steams and wetlands and CO Zones that serve multiple purposes store and slowly release storm water surface runoff renovation' aesthetic value lost wildlife habitat surface waters run into Lake Champlain. By international agreement we are committed to improving and preserving the quality of Lake Champlain. That cannot be accomplished as long as we continue to piecemeal destroy the ability of limited conservation zones to operate as vehicles for water conservation. The Comprehensive plan recommends the maintenance of UNDISTURBED conservation zones along major, minor streams as well as well defined streams and tributaries such as the Fayette stream. The Comprehensive Plan states that "Erosion control, or lack. of it, is the most significant factor affecting stream water quality in South Burlington". it goes on to say that "effective erosion control measures include hay bale dams, silt fences and well 'vegetated stable banks". This bank does not appear to be well vegetated and stable. INTERNATIONA April 23, 1995 Mr. Ray Belair Assistant Planner City of South Burlington, Planning Office 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Conservation Zone Encroachment at Banana's University Project, 7 Fayette Road, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Belair: Griffin International (Griffin) has conducted an evaluation of the stream bank area adjacent to the above referenced property. This letter contains findings and recommendations regarding the stream bank area. A fifty foot wide Conservation Zone exists north and west of the newly constructed building on the subject property. Portions of seven parking spaces located west of the building and about 1/3 of the dumpster area extend into the Conservation Zone. This area of encroachment is approximately 900 square feet. I ie parking area is 40 feet from a small creek which runs through the Conservation Zone. The creek was observed to be approximately 2 feet wide near the area of the encroachment. The creek is likely perennial, only containing flow from groundwater in times when the seasonal water table is at its peak in the spring of each year. The stream is also active during storm events when the creek accepts surface run-off and discharge from nearby storm drains. The geometry of the stream channel suggests that the creek has moved in a southerly directionin the area of the encroachment. In this area, the southern side of the stream channel is an erosional environment; the northern side of the stream channel is a depositional environment. During times of high flow, particularly during storm events, water flows at a higher velocity in the vicinity of the southern bank and erodes soil. Soil eroded from upstream is deposited on the northern side of the channel were the water P.O. Box 943 • Williston, VT 05495 • 802-865-4288 Y Mr. Ray Belair April 23, 1995 Page 2 flows at a lower velocity. The stream, in the future, will move even closer to the parking area and undercut the bank. This process will likely take decades and will occur regardless of the presence of parking area in the Conservation Zone. The southerly movement and erosion of the southern creek bank can be prevented with engineering controls. However, permits to construct engineering controls must be obtained prior to their construction. During an inspection of the creek, vegetation in the Conservation Zone appeared to be both native species and introduced grasses. Vegetation in the Conservation Zone appeared normal except where missing in erosional areas not related to the subject encroachment and where disturbed by construction activities in areas directly adjacent to the encroachment. From a environmental perspective, the encroachment of the parking area into the Conservation Zone has had no significant impact. Erosion on the southern stream bank is naturally occurring. The cross -sectional area of the stream channel has not been significantly reduced by the encroachment, therefore the hydraulic capacity of the steam channel has not been altered. Storm run-off from the 900 square foot encroachment area does not flow into the Conservation Zone but is directed towards the south. A curb which perimeters the parking area provides excellent protection from slope erosion which could otherwise be caused by surface run-off. During our investigation, the only significant environmental condition observed was a considerable quanity of litter in the Conservation Zone. The litter was present along the entire length of the Conservation Zone and did not appear to have originated from the subject property. We recommend that the Banana's University Project arrange for the cleanup and routine maintenance of the most significant environmental condition in the Conservation Zone (the litter). We also recommend that the Bananas University Project arrange for the planting of appropriate vegetation in areas in the Conservation Zone which are in need of erosional protection. We recommend that this work be conducted in exchange for the allowance of the encroachment of the portions of the seven parking spaces in the Conservation Zone. Sincer y, Laurie T. Reed, Project Geologist C. Greg Beldock, Banana's University Project City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 3, 1995 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: C.O. District Encroachment, Fayette Road Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of a memo to the Planning Commission from the Natural Resources Committee in regards to your parking area's encroachment into the C.O. District. If you have any questions, please give me a call. RJB/mcp 1 Encl TSi erely, r� a and J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant 0 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Natural Resources Committee DATE: 28 April 1995 RE: L&M Partnership Sketch Plan Application as discussed on 14 March 1995 The Natural Resources Committee has expressed concern about six parking spaces and a dumpster that were shown on site plans to be encroaching in the minor stream CO Zone behind the business .known as the Discovery Zone. As a result of meeting with Mr. Beldock following the Planning Commission meeting of 14 March, the Committee agreed to visit the site and make recommendations based on what was observed. Zoning Regulations were drafted in order to "maintain and improve the quality of natural resources such as soil, air, and water and the natural processes by which they are related , and insure a safe, healthful, and aesthetically -pleasing community. Any uses not expressly permitted are prohibited, except those which are allowed as conditional uses". The boundaries of the CO District clearly states in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, effective September 12, 1994, amended November 7, 1994. "All land along a minor stream or drainage way which is within 50 feet horizontal distance of the center -line of a -minor stream or drainage -way". Allowed conditional uses include "outdoor recreation, research and educational activities, and hydro -electric power generation". This parking lot does not fit the above stated conditions. In fact, 3.401 states that "no building... including any structure or construction such as parking lots are permissible". It is clearly stated that "no use shall be permitted that will in any way damage or alter the character of soils or vegetation or impair the quality of surface water". The Natural Resources committee visited the parking lot and stream bank behind the Discovery Zone on 21 March 1995 at 4:30 PM. It was raining at the time and had been raining for most of the day. The Committee made the following observations: The stream: The stream flows in a well defined channel, twelve to eighteen inches deep, that meanders through its modest fioodplain. The floodplain sediments appear to be fine sands. A geomorphic definition of a stream is a channelized flow of water. A channel is an eroded depression through which a stream flows. The stream was very turbid, there was excessive particulates being carried by the stream. Although the stream is not deep, the bottom was not visible indicating significant erosion of relatively small size particles. The Bank: The slope of the bank is relatively steep. It was found to be very difficult to climb up or down the stream due to the steep slope and composition of the bank, which was primarily clay. The bank is not stable and is easily eroded. At one point a member sank to ankle depth in clay and nearly lost their boot. The sediments making up the surface appear to be a variety of materials. There is tongue of white crushed rock commonly seen in construction that extends eighteen feet out from the curb toward the stream. The Committee observed patches of well sorted sand, mottled grey -brown clay, blue -grey clay, concrete slabs, and a one foot diameter pile of what appeared to be ashtray refuse, all in the CO Zone. This area appeared to have been filled within the last year. We observed eroding channels on the bank at least four inches deep. The bank stabilization steps taken appear to be limited to a few planted trees. There did not appear to be an attempt to use construction paper or straw. It is uncertain as to how grass would be planted on the crushed rock. The Dumpsters: One dumpster encroaching in the CO Zone is located in a wooden enclosure with a locking gate. The gate had been vandalized with its hinges torn off. In addition there was a dumpster outside the containment area with no fence around it. This dumpster was also clearly in the CO Zone. Debris was scattered around the dumpster. The Parking Lot: The parking spaces in question were found to be well within the CO Zone. A measure of fifty feet from the center -line of the stream found the CO Zone to end at approximately the center -line of the road that leads to the underground parking. The distance from the stream center -line to the parking lot curb is 33 feet. The Natural Resources Committee agrees with the Planning Commission, the parking spaces should all be of standard size with none of them in the CO Zone. The dumpsters should also be out of the CO Zone. After viewing the site in question, Mr. Beldock indicated that he would supply the Committee with a written plan for renovating the disturbed stream bank. As of this date, the Committee has not received this. The Natural Resources Committee makes the following recommendations: 1. Regarding the dumpsters: Keep the dumpsters out of the CO Zone. Construct a containment area of material that is more durable than wooden trellis. 2. Regarding the Parking lot: Move the parking area out of the CO Zone. Ad -Just the bank grade to a more stable configuration and restore the natural vegetation, a combination of grasses and shrubs. 3. Regarding the Area behind the Discovery Zone building: Stabilize the area between the building and stream by restoring natural vegetation of grasses and shrubs. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 1, 1995 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Site Revisions, L&M Park Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the March 14, 1995 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. nc re J Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: L&M Partnership ITRIFFI INTERNATION April 23, 1995 Mr. Ray Belair Assistant Planner City of South Burlington, Planning Office 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Conservation Zone Encroachment at Banana's University Project, 7 Fayette Road, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Belair:.. . Griffin International (Griffin) has conducted an evaluation of the stream bank area adjacent to the above referenced property. This letter contains findings and recommendations regarding the stream bank area. A fifty foot wide Conservation Zone exists north and west of the newly constructed building on the subject property. Portions of seven parking spaces located west of the building and about 1/3 of the dumpster area extend into the Conservation Zone. This area of encroachment is approximately 900 square feet. T lie parking area is 40 feet from a small creek which runs through the Conservation Zone. The creek was observed to be approximately 2 feet wide near the area of the encroachment. The creek is likely perennial, only containing flow from groundwater in times when the seasonal water table is at its peak in the spring of each year. The stream is also active during storm events when the creek accepts surface run-off and discharge from nearby storm drains. The geometry of the stream channel suggests that the creek has moved in a southerly direction in the area.of the encroachment. In this'area; the southern side of the stream channel is an erosional environment; the northern side of the stream channel is a depositional environment. During times of high flow, particularly during storm events, water flows at a higher velocity in the vicinity of the southern bank and erodes soil. Soil eroded from upstream is deposited on the northern side of the channel were the water P.O. Box 943 • Williston, VT 05495 • 802-865-4288 Mr. Ray Belair April 23, 1995 Page 2 flows at a lower velocity. The stream, in the future, will move even closer to the parking area and undercut the bank. This process will likely take decades and will occur regardless of the presence of parking area in the Conservation Zone. The southerly movement and erosion of the southern creek bank can be prevented with engineering controls. However, permits to construct engineering controls must be obtained prior to their construction. During an inspection of the creek, vegetation in the Conservation Zone appeared to be both native species and introduced grasses. Vegetation in the Conservation Zone appeared normal except where missing in erosional areas not related to the subject encroachment and where disturbed by construction activities in areas directly adjacent to the encroachment. From a environmental perspective, the encroachment of the parking area into the Conservation Zone has had no significant impact. Erosion on the southern stream bank is naturally occurring. The cross -sectional area of the stream channel has not been significantly reduced by the encroachment, therefore the hydraulic capacity of the steam channel has not been altered. Storm run-off from the 900 square foot encroachment area does not flow into the Conservation Zone but is directed towards the south. A curb which perimeters the parking area provides excellent protection from slope erosion which could otherwise be caused by surface run-off. During our investigation, the only significant environmental condition observed was a considerable quanity of litter in the Conservation Zone. The litter was present along the entire length of the Conservation Zone and did not appear to have originated from the subject property. We recommend that the Banana's University Project arrange for the cleanup and routine maintenance of the most significant environmental condition in the Conservation Zone (the litter). We also recommend that the Banana's University Project arrange for the planting of appropriate vegetation in areas in the Conservation Zone which are in need of erosional protection. We recommend that this work be conducted in exchange for the allowance of the encroachment of the portions of the seven parking spaces in the Conservation Zone. Sincer y, Laurie T. Reed, Project Geologist C. Greg Beldock, Banana's University Project Gregg Beldock April 13, 1995 Joe Weith South Burlington City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Joe: Over the course of the last few weeks I have hired a hydrologist to review the condition of the "stream" north of our building at Fayette Road. I have also employed a cleaning contractor on a bi-morthly basis, Servicemaster, to pick up refuse that blows into the stream or is dumped into the stream. It has been brought to my attention by the hydrologist, Griffin International, and the people at Servicemaster that the amount of refuse, perhaps even dumping, by the neighboring property owners and tenants is nothing short of disgusting. Could your offices send out a note asking McDonalds to place some trash cans around the site? Could you ask the car dealership to do a little clean up and not leave refuse behind their building? A little bit of help will go a long way. Sincerely, g Beldock 2117 Dorset Street 9 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 9 (802) 985-9446 PA ke)t'-' ^49 p"Lle"16 r �6 0 s +�� -- -- ---- -- — --- — -- �` 457 , -- -.013 yeoa X , ZG 9(9 2 r1AY- 1 0 THU - 5 1 LAFRK I F-d REALTY F' - 02 i Precast ,Prestressed Concrete Parking Structures. - Recommended Practice for Design and Construction Table 2.1 RECOMMENDED MINIMUM PARKING SPACE 'WIDTH AND MODULE DIMENSIONS FOR PARKING FACILITY DESIGN 1. FOR SEPARATED SMALL CAR/LARGE CAR DESIGNS: Space Width Type of User Small all Car 7'-411 Large Car 8'-2" All day parker (employee, resident, ctc.) Visitor 7'-811 8'-611 (hospital, central business district) High turnover 8'-0" 8%1Of' (shopping, bank, etc.) Wall to Wall Module Angle Small Car Large Car 45' 42'-0" 49,.011 50, 43'-611 51'-011 556 45'-011 53'-011 606 46.011 551-011 650 47'-0" 56'-611 70' 48'-0" 58'-0" 759 49'-0" 59'-601 909 51'-0" 62'-011 Adjustments to Modules: l) If a curb, wheel stop, wall or other vehicle restraint is placed at every parking space, the modules above can be reduced by 1'-0". 2) For cach 1" additional space width, the module may be reduced 3" to maintain the same level of comfort. 4� 2. FOR ONE-SIZE-FXTS-ALL DESIGNS: Use weighted average of above dimensions, i,c., for 60% large cars and 40% small cars in a high turnover situation: Space width = 0.60 (8.83) + 0.40 (8.0) = 8.498' or 8'-6" Wall-to-wall module = 0,60 (62.0) + 0.40 (51.0) ; 57.6', say 58'-0" Page 16 THt_t RK I N RE:AI TY P i ja le 2-2 Typical Parking Dimensions Small Cars Angie Interlock Reduction 1 Overhang o Vehicle Projcction VP Aisle Width AW W1 W2 Module Widths W3 W4 W5 45' 2'.0" 1'-5" 15'-3" 11'-6" 26'•9" 42'-0" 40'-0" 38'-0" 39'.2" 50, t'-10" 1'-6" 15'-9" 12'.0" 27'-9" 43'•6" 41'-8" 39'.10" 40'•6" 55' 1'-8" 1'-8" 16'-l" 12'-10" 28'•11" 45'-0" 43'-4" 41'-8" 41'-8" 60, 1'-5" 1'-9" 16'-4„ 13'-4" 29'.8', 46'-0" 44'-7" 43'-2" 42,-6" 65' 1'-2" t'-10" 16'•6" 140-0" 30'.6" 47'-0" 45%10" 44'-8" 43'4" 70' I'-0" 1'-11" 16'-7" 14•10" 3l'-S" 48'-0" 47'•0" 46'-0" 44'-2" 75' 0'.9" 1'•11" 16'-6" 16'.0" 32'-6" 49'-0" 48'-3" 47'.6„ 45'-2" 90, 0'.0" 2'-0" 15'-6" 20'-0" 35'-6" 51'.Olt 5l'-0" 51'-0" 47'-0" Large Cars Angle Interlock Reduction i Overhang o Vehicle Projection VP Aisle Width AW W1 W2 Module Widths W3 W4 WS 45- 2'-4" 2'-1" 18'-0" 13'-0" 31'-0" 49'.0" 46'-8" 44'-4" 44'-10" 50' 2'.1" 2'.4" 18'-8" 13'-8" 32,-4" 51'-0" 48,-11" 46,-10" 46'-4" 55' 1'• 10 2'.5" 19'.2" 14'-8" 23'-10" 53'-0" 51'-2" 49'-4" 481-2" 60' 1'-8" 2'-7" 19'-6" 16'4' 35'-6" 55'-0" 53'-4" 5IA" 49'-10" 65' 1'-4" 2'-9" 19'-9" 17'-0" 36'-9" 56'-6" 55'-2" 53'-10" 51'-0" 70, 1'-1" 2'-10" 19'-10" 18'-4" 38'-2" 58'-0" 56'.11" 55'-10" 521-4" 75' 0'-10" 2'-11" 19'-9" 20'-0" 391•9" 59'•6" 58'-8" 57'-10" 53,-8" 90, 0'-0" 3'-0" t 8'-8" 24'.8" 4314" 62'-0" 62'.0" 62' 0" 56'-0" 0 Parking angle W1 Parking module width (wall to wall), single loaded aisle W2 Parking module width (wall to wall), double loaded aisle W3 Parking module width (wall to interlock), double loaded aisle W4 Parking module width (interlock to interlock), double loaded aisle W5 Parking module width (curb to curb), double loaded aisle AW Aisle width WP Stall width parallel to aisle VP Projected vehicle length measured perpendicular to aisle St. Stall length SW Stall width a Overhang clearance i interlock reduction Page 17 THI_I _ LARK I N REALT'-t P - Fig} 0 Figure 2-24 STANDARD 900 SPACE Figure 2.26 S-C,O, SPACE (Small Car Only) ■ ( to r.i Figure 2-25 STANDARD ANGLE SPACE . Figure 2-27 HANDICAP SPACE PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 March 10, 1995 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Site Revisions, L&M Park Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, March 14, 1995 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, JW/mcp Encls pc: L&M Partnership please gi e me a call. i c r y Jo Weith, Ci y Planner PLANNING COMMISSION 9 AUGUST 1994 PAGE 4 6. Public Hearing: Revised Final Plat application of L&M Partnership to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61-room hotel, a 20,000 sq. ft. movie theater (1000 seats), a 22,500 sq. ft. restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3,500 sq. ft. restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive - through service, located on Shelburne Rd. The amendment consists of adding a second access to the underground parking facility. Mr. Sheahan stepped down due to a conflict of interest. said Mr. McClellanA the new access will be one-way to the underground parking. They will widen the curb cut to allow for it. Mr. Weith asked if the garage door will be centered. Mr. McClellan said it will be slightly off -center. Mr. Weith asked that the plan be amended to show this. Mr. Weith said he had met with Mr. Beldock who is concerned that theater parking is using the lot across from the theater before the theater lot is full, using parking needed for his building. He felt signage is needed to direct people to the theater parking. Mr. Beldock noted this is a safety problem because people with children going to his facility will be forced to wander through the lot and cross roads. Mr Teeson suggested a letter to the theater owners outlining the potential problem and suggested it be allev- iated by sufficient signage. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of L&M Partnership to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 sq. ft. movie theater (1000 seats), a 22,500 sq. ft. restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3,500 sg ft. restaurant with drive -through service and a bank with drive - through service, located on Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of adding a second access to the underground parking facility as depicted on a two -page set of plans page one entitled "L&M Park Site & Utilities Plan" prepared by Fitz Patrick -Llewellyn Inc with a last revision date of 7/12/94 with the following stipulations• 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Pursuant to Section 19.103b of the zoning regulations the Planning Commission approves a curb cut of 63 feet in width to accommodate the new access. It is the Commission's opinion that allowing a curb cut greater than 36 feet in width will not compromise vehicular safety on Fayette Road due to the one-way nature of the access to the underground parking facility. PLANNING COMMISSION 9 AUGUST 1994 PAGE 5 3 The final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Chair or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. 4 Any changes to the final plat plans shall require Planning Commission approval. 5 The plan shall be revised prior to recording to show the one-way driveway access to the underground parking facility in the correct location. 6 Prior to recording the final plat, the applicant shall submit a signage plan for the PUD which encourages theater goers to park and fill the theater parking lot prior to overflowing into the parking area north of Fayette Dr. The signage plan shall require approval of the City Planner and shall comply with the sign ordinance. Mrs Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come befre the 777s ion, the meeting adjourned at 9:10 pm. N, k SCALE = I "= 40' 0 MOVIE PATRONS PLEASE FILL THEATER LOT BEFORE USING OVERFLOW LOT 1,5' ADDITIONAL SIUNAGE PLAN OTERVRoc Nm LLEWELLymINCORPORATED ENGINEERING AND PLANNING SERVICES WILLISTON VERMONT PROJECT NUMBER 88047 DATE NOV 1994 DRAWN BY TPB SHEET 1 OF 1 N/F SOUTH BURLINGTON CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH 4 INN 16l Off''. ♦ / - ``ems -- _ __ 1 INV T y'r 0,600 SF j I ! `,-14EATER y 1 { I I I 1 _IL _ I -1 - E_: 1 k 1- --p DESCRIPTON Vim- - ,i IL - pFY�� r t I _ 1. FOR ALL PROPERTY LINE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY � • 11 _•a o- _ 1 - /�J/J/// ,? _ INFORhfATIDN SE PLAN ENTITLED _ BY FITZPATRICK-LLEW F``SIIBNCO"RPORATEI) DRAWING PNUMBERPD-;724, BATED DEC. 1990 L 2. FOR DETAIL OF SHELBURNE ROAD RTE. 7), SEE "L & M PARK, TRAFF ( ANAL PLANS AND DETAILS", D-3978, D-3)'), D4031-D4035 BY FITZPATRIC&-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED • � s- - p� � � t-t _, REST. r � � i h+ r .. ` � ' .,.�. T r LEGEND L TABLE OF STRUCTURES C ;�'.;�1. .N�L�G,J_,91I I 2¢6aEEGa✓+.-.K^/.Y>.,E�EE�C CQt'?tYAr-.c7cJEGQrFS-.r..+ �¢�.P+.Q1.pG+cCT.N.�iL: ..L -Cx OCA TE DESCRIPTION NO. RIM INV.. COMMENT DI 1 201.7 194.5 DI 2 201.1 196.1 - DI 3 200.5 795. -- _-- D/ 4 2070. 196.0 Of 5 195.E 190.6 DI 6 195.6 7907 _ DI 7 1869 181.9 _ DI 8 186.9 187.0- DI 9 DI 10 1 -.-? 188.5 185. 7 1835 ---_ DI 11 187.9 162.9 D/ 12 187.9 182.0 D/ 13 185.7 180.7 - DI 14 1 183.0 1770 DI 5 182.5 176.5 DI 16 199.8 194.0 _ D' 18 DI !9 20 lB57 194.3 IB20 DI 49 DI 21 DI 22 0123 202 :96 200 I y 26 201 U �.1�95 5_ 201,0 1196' -- - � DI g4 200 5 9 _--- " D175 197.7 I870 D• 4B IB3.7 I80.0 MH I 201.8 194.8 MN 2 � 197 1 790. l -- MH J IBB 9 1 /82.0 0199 :..99 /93.8 DI 16 Ieb c lB4.0 DI 1 � {91 C lB4.C+ RAISE FRAME TO MADE -_... _ i - r _ `_J , RECEIVED ••-••__N-___ PERIMETER PROPERLY LINE A I - __ LINE -WAY/EASEMENT Lln' ___EX c 0 OUR o "P PROPOSED CONTOUR - - - - - -12.5- - , - - EXISDNC SANITARY SEIYER/MANHOLE O's 0 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWfR/MANHOLE - - - - -- - EXIS77NG WATER L INE .. . , � „ w � a OPOSED WATER LIN E/✓ALVC/HttRANT MACINTOSH AVE. FEB O I ✓5 LET PROUNDERDRAIN POSED 5AN rARY FORCE MAIN 0 - ' sty. of So. Burlington - E° I XIST/NG STORM R / !NL T E I _ I �[r ✓T - FOR REVISIONS I - 36- {i- L.A.L. STAMP BELOW. FOR REVISIONS 37 AND ABOVE SEE D.R.F. STAMP. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN 7EET 1 Inch 40 ft y IT /S USERS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THESE DRAWINGS INCLUDE n, 4 '' THE THE LATEST REVISIONS. _ PRELIMINARY PLAT ACT 250 AMENDMENT 1 ee, " RI '71 roo uPGwT�D ..Ir-oanv.To,L I pe 15 FINAL PLAT T CONSTRUCAON APPROVALS SDI& BOF INDICATES OVALS STAGE M£ DESIGN 15 CUNRENTI Y !N _- . - --_- 11 ._ II •` r ' i3 EE\ LSE 4ta , --4 ti f E ¢EST co. pu.i a z1 94 L & M PARK 0 SITE & UTILITIES PLAN I 1 Il ,n w Sc- vA..-.0 ¢ c• wurw i w 994' 1N l T �.�* u _ 1 e e Vim' .s •_� Y -- - _ 1111 "��. .•:^ �.w L UPDATED N F FARRELL A--- 2^ 88047 D��pQ4a�Qa� ah n �,c ,7 IS 92 4 ¢- ¢r •3� ¢.7v.>TOJ.T - XN£ 1990 LEW 5 9 SI c x Q..� of ¢3`; a E T¢a.+:.E o .•+ c�9e _7 •ti. .cc-xor-_m 'tee e ... w >, r ae - ..w Zc .. �- car T z.,�ItS A.o•� �,.,:. �- TH INCORPORATED Te_ G��¢cu..l��..a,c .acts ERoreEnn+c ..c (...w..:. ..cEs - 1 1 ..fi cw�wif. a x D 34F No DATE DE_ F'PTIDN WILLISTON VERMONT e -:2, if o 9� S vlC.! A)C-"7cJ 9,�/ AJ 101 X 7-0 Ca ACT 71 x /;l r r 1 2a -- 2 2 P-A" 20 Preliminary Memo - Planning March 14, 1995 agenda items February 27, 1995 Page 2 Other: --- if lot #8A is to be merged with Wyand and Grunvald property, the plat will have to show the entire lot. EUGENE WARD - LANDSCAPING CREDIT - SITE PLAN --- the Planning Commission is not required to consider an application for a property where it has previously approved development unless certain conditions are met (see enclosed memo). Applicant should submit a written statement demonstrating that one of these conditions is satisfied. --- plan shows seven (7) Potentilla plants proposed yet this application is for no additional landscaping --- plan should show a bike rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations NOYES, NELSON & HEINDEL - ADD OFFICE SPACE - SKETCH PLAN --- sketch plan should include graphic scale and location map --- provide gross square footage of additional office area --- provide total number of employees with the expanded office area --- provide bike rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations --- plan should note that the easterly boundary line is the zoning boundary between the Cl District to the west and the R4 District to the east --- provide lot coverage information including front yard coverage information along both Shelburne Road and White Place --- it appears that there won't be enough parking to serve the expanded office use. Applicant should conduct a parking count study to justify expanded office area. --- this application is not guaranteed a spot on the 3/14/95 agenda until the above items are addressed. L&M PARTNERSHIP - SITE REVISIONS - SKETCH PLAN --- the parking stall and aisle width dimensions proposed for the northerly portion of the sub -surface parking area are Preliminary Memo - Planning March 14, 1995 agenda items February 27, 1995 Page 3 unacceptable. These spaces should either meet the current standards in the zoning regulations or the "One -Size -Fits - All Design standard contained in the publication submitted by the applicant entitled "Recommended Minimum Parking Space Width and Module Dimensions for Parking Facility Design" (8.5'x 18' parking stall; 22' wide aisle). --- plan does not show the width of the curb cut to the Bananas University building on Fayette Road either as constructed or as approved in the field last fall by the City Planner and City Engineer. Staff measured this distance to be approximately 74 feet. --- plan should show bike rack at Mcdonald's --- revised coverage information should be submitted --- revised final plat should include an "as -built" landscaping plan. CENTURY PARTNERS - RETAIL BUILDING - SITE PLAN --- building needs to be shifted ten (10) feet to the west in order to comply with the recommended future r.o.w. for Mary Street extension. --- site plan should include: o lot dimensions o street address (2 Corporate Way) o location and details of building mounted lights, if any o bike rack is required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. --- provide total number of employees and maximum number on the site at any one time --- provide retail floor area --- total lot coverage indicated on plan is 74% and on the application is 86%. Which is correct? --- this property must have 75 spaces for use of 100 Dorset Street. Staff counts only 72 spaces dedicated for 100 Dorset Street on the plan --- parking aisle width inadequate between the 7 space and 15 space parking areas north of building (minimum requirement is 24 feet) --- there are 169 spaces being provided, Table 26-1 of the zoning regulations requires at least six (6) handicapped spaces for a parking area of this size, only five (5) handicapped spaces are being provided w4-I�L>� February 8, 1995 Mr. Dick Ward, Zoning Administrator South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 In re: Bananas University, a.k.a. L and M Park Commercial Subdivision Dear Dick, Our office recently completed an as built drawing of the parking constructed in association with Gregg Beldock's commercial construction at L and M Park. This plan showed that the parking layout as built was different from the approved plan in that a greater number of parking spaces were actually provided in the garage. This was accomplished by varying from the standard 9 foot by 20 foot parking spaces normally required. I would like to encourage you to consider accepting these spaces as built for the following reasons: The parking spaces as built conform to the space dimensions recommended by the Parking Consultants Council of the National Parking Association. These standards, reprinted from the "Parking Structures; Recommended Practice for Design and Construction" manual, 1988 edition, are attached. 2. Parking spaces within parking structures operate under ideal conditions compared to outdoor spaces. The high quality and level of lighting, and consistently dry pavement, allow use of narrower spaces without the limitations of snow and ice. The cost of constructing structured parking is several times the cost of a typical outdoor space. It is good policy to encourage the development of structured parking both practically and aesthetically. If minor variations from the normal standard yield additional structured parking, and that in turn reduces the cost per space for indoor parking, it is likely that allowing such deviations will promote use of structured parking. Please review the attached standards. I am sure Mr. Beldock is eager to complete this process, and would be happy to answer any questions you may have regarding this issue. Very truly yours Greg 4buZ— n Precast Prestressed Concrete Pal,.4 Structures: 1 Recommended Practice for Design and Construction With the popularity of vans and over -height recreational vehicles, some parking structures are developed with special high clearance areas. Often this is done on the first or grade tier, where the grade slab can be lowered to create the additional clear height required. Generally for pas- senger vehicles a 7'-0" minimum clear height is used, although 7'-4" to 7'-8" may provide a more spacious feeling. For over -height vehicles, 8'-6" to 9'-0" is often used. Height clearances on ramp breaks should be checked from the wheel line, not from the floor surface (Figure 2-23). 2.5 Parking Space and Module Design The most efficient parking structure in terms of square feet per space is not necessarily developed with a 90-degree parking stall. Properly designed angle parking layouts with one-way end crossovers are often more efficient than 90-degree layouts (Figure 2-28). The ease of parking in a one-way traffic angle parking layout often offsets any decrease in ef- ficiency when compared to 90-degree parking. Parking space width and parking module (bumper wall to bumper wall dimension) can vary depending on the level of comfort desired. Some parking structure designers choose to provide separate spaces for large and small cars while other designers choose to use the "one -size -fits -all" parking space concept. It is not uncommon to see a one -size -fits -all parking space of 8'-6" (Figures 24 and 25) in width compared to a large car space of 9'-0" wide and it small car space of 7'-6" wide (Figure 2-26). The ratio of large cars to small cars will vary in different locations in North America. Most zoning codes require special spaces for vehicles used by the hand- icapped. Generally these spaces are 12'-0" wide and are placed near the elevators or on the first tier of the structure (Figure 2-27). Even with the "one -size -fits -all" concept, it is common to place SCO (small car only) spaces at the end of parking rows adjacent to turns to in- sure that a large vehicle does not project into the drive lane (Figure 2-28). The vehicle turnover in a parking space is a factor in selecting parki[rg space width. A low turnover facility for all -day parkers may have an 8'-2" width; 8'-6" may be provided for an average turnover and 8'-10" for a turnover of more than five vehicles per day. Parking space module and space dimensions as recommended by the Parking Consultants Council of the National Parking Association are shown on Table 2-1. Note that where large and small cars are mixed, a one -size -fits -all space is developed which is determined by the weighted average of the small and large car space dimensions. 0 0 VERT. 10'-0' LONG CURVE > 6%z Figure 2-22 TRUE VEHICLE CLEARANCE FLOOR TO CEILINC Figure 2-23 Page 12 Table 2-2 Typical Parking Dimensions Small Cars Interlock Vehicle Aisle Ankle Reduction Overhang Projection Width Module Widths i o VP AW W1 W2 Wz W4 WS 45' 2'-0" 1'-5" 15'-3" 11'-6" 26'-9" 42'-0" 40'-0" 39'-0" 39'-2" 50` 1'-10" 1'-(i" 15'-9" 12'-0" 27'-9" 43'-6" 41'-8" 39'-10" 40'-6" 55" 1'-8" I '-R" 16'-1 " 12'-10" 28'-1 1 " 45'-0" 43'-4" 41'-9" 41'-8" 60' 1'-5" 1' 9" 16'4" 13'-4" 29'-8" 46'-0" 44'-7" 43'-2" 42'-6" 6 5' 1'-2" 1 '-10" 16'-6" 14'-0" 30' 6" 47'-0" 45'-10" 44'-8" 43'-4" 7o" I'-0" I' -I I" 16'-7" 14'-10" 31'-5" 48'-0" 47'-0" 46'-0" 44'-2" 7. ( 0 - )" 1 '- I 1 " 16 -6" 16 0" 3"'-6" 49'_ 4R'-3" '-0" 47'-2" 10 0'-0" 2'-0" '- 15 6" 20 -0 35 -6" i I'-0" 51'-0" 51 47'-0" Large Cars Interlock Vehicle Aisle Angle Reduction Overhang Projection Width Module Widths i o VP AW WI W2 W3 W4 W5 45" 2'-4" 2'-1" 18' 0" 13'-0" 31'-0" 49'-0" 46'-8" 44'-4" 44'-10" 50° 2'-1" 2'-4" IR'-8" 13'-8" 32'-4" 51' 0" 48'-11" 46'-10" 46'_4" 55' 1'-10" 2'-5" 19'-2" 14'-8" 23'-10" 53'-0" 51'-2" 49'-4" 48'-2" 60' 1'-8" 2'-7" 19'-6" 16'-0" 35'-6" 55'-0" 53'-4" 5l'-8" 49'-10" 65' 1'-4" 2'-9" 19'-9" 17'-0" 36'-9" 56'-6" 55'-2" 53'-10" 51'-0" 70` 1 '-1 " 2'-10" 19'-10" 19'4" 38'-2" 58'-0" 56'-1 1 " 55'-10" 52'-4" 75' 0'-10" 2'-1 1 " 19'-9" 20'-0" 39'-9" 59'-6" 58'-8" 57'-10" 53'-8" 901 0'-0" 3'-0" 18'-8" 24'-8" 43'-4" 62'-0" 62'-0" 62'-0" 56'-0" w_ 0 Parking angle W1 Parking module width (wall to wall), single loaded aisle W2 Parking module width (wall to wall), double loaded aisle W i Parking module width (wall to interlock), double loaded aisle VV4 Parking module width (interlock to interlock), double loaded aisle W5 Parking module width (curb to curb), double loaded aisle AW Aisle width W P Stall width parallel to aisle VP Projected vehicle length measured perpendicular to aisle SL Stall length Sw Stall width 0 Overhang clearance i Interlock reduction Page 17 Precast Prestressed Concrete Parking Structures: Recommended Practice for Design and Construction 1975 L0 x8'-6" 'Nel.- - H 1985 Figure 2-29 o. 60' F-170" 6 SPACES 0 9'-0" USE OF SMALL 60` = 7 SPACES 0 CAR ONLY SPACES 8'-4 1 /2" x 70 ` l,'igure 2-28 Figure 2-30 I'age 14 Precast Prestressed Concrete Parking Structures: Recommended Practice for Design and Construction Table 2-1 RECOMMENDED MINIMUM PARKING SPACE WIDTH AND MODULE DIMENSIONS FOR PARKING FACILITY DESIGN 1. FOR SEPARATED SMALL CAR/LARGE. CAR DESIGNS: Parking Space Width Type of User Small Car 714" Large Car 8/-2" All day parker (employee, resident, etc.) Visitor 7'-8" (hospital, central business district) High turnover 8'-0" (shopping, bank, etc.) Wall to Wall Module Angle Small Car Large Car 45' 42'4" 49'-0" 50' 43'-6" 51All 55' 45'4" 53'-0" 60' 46'4" 5514" 65" 47'4" 56'4" 70° 48'-0" 58'4" 75° 49'-0" 59'-6" 90° 51'-0" y, Adjustments to Modules: 1)11' a curb, wheel stop, wall or other vehicle restraint is placed at every parking space, the modules above can be reduced by 1'-0". 2) For each 1 " additional space width, the module may be reduced 3" to maintain the same level of comfort. 2. FOR ONE -SIZE -FITS -ALL DESIGNS: Use weighted average of above dimensions, i.e., for 60% large cars and 400/o small cars in a high turnover situation: Space width = 0.60 (8.83) + 0.40 (8.0) = 8.498' or 8'-6 Wall-to-wall module = 0.60 (62.0) + 0.40 (51.0) = 57.6', say 58'-0" Page 16 Gregg B e I d o c k March 2, 1995 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Site Revisions, L&M Park Dear Mr. Belair: I am in receipt of your preliminary memo regarding the March 14, 1995 Planning Meeting. I offer the following information for your review and consideration.- -The parking stall and aisle widths in the underground garage are predicated by the location and dimensions of structural columns. Most of the spaces in the garage supersede the standards, as do the aisles. The spaces in the North end of the garage have been the most frequently utilized; we have had no complaints. The garage was constructed at tremendous expense to afford tremendous convenience. The project is a success in large part due to the underground parking. We are trying to enhance the convenience of the shared parking arrangement ( which by the way is working extremely well now that people are aware of the underground garage ) by maximizing the use of the space between the columns. Would you prefer us to simply put an X across some of the spaces that are 100" rather than 102" in width? I think it benefits all of us to provide the maximum number of underground spaces as long as they are functional. The attached pictures indicate that the spaces are all useable and well utilized. -pis Joe Wyeth, Dick Ward, Bill Szymanski and I have discussed on numerous occasions, the curb cut at the Southwest entrance to the lower parking lots and underground parking garage will be finalized in the Spring. The cut will match the design requested by Bill during our December meeting at the site. The marks made by Bill are still on the ground. In the meantime there are concrete curb stops laid along the ground adjacent to Bill's handiwork. Skip Mclellan at Fitzpatrick/Llewellyn uses "templates" to design the curb cuts. Skip tells me the difference between his drawing and Bill's "in the field layout" is two to three feet, much of which is taken up in the radius. -I will formally request that John Larkin request Skip Mclellan to drawing in the bike rack in front of Mcdonald's. -To the best of my knowledge there has been no change in the coverage ratios. Please let me know if you find differently. The variance does not occur on the parcel I control; I will direct your 2117 Dorset Street 9 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 • (802) 985-9446 comments regarding this particular issue to John Larkin. -A final plat will be submitted to your offices in the Spring showing all of the landscaping as it exists at that time; please be aware that in the Spring not all of the landscaping will be completed on the site. Please do not hesitate to call my offices if you have any further questions or comments.Thank you for your efforts on our behalf. (7' TING DETAIL NT5 X t . \ Lt WWr '/J, L AMV)4t lu- v,- go-ww� NO G e ee SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL I f At I E W& L \\ - --- + 4- 4 45 + lo No Text Gregg B e I d o c k March 2, 1995 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Site Revisions, L.cgcM Park Dear. M.r. Belair: I am in receipt of your preliminary memo regarding the March 14, 1995 Planning Meeting. I offer the following information for your review and consideration- -The parking stall and aisle widths in the underground garage are predicated by the location and dimensions of stnictural columns Most of the spaces in the garage supersede the standards, as do the aisles The spaces in the North end of the garage have been the most frequently utilized; we have had no complaints. The garage was constructed at tremendous expense to afford tremendous convenience. The project is a success in large part due to the underground parking. We are trying to enhance the convenience of the shared parking arrangement ( which by the way is working extremely well now that people are aware of the underground garage ) by maximizing the use of the space between the columns. Would you prefer us to simply put an X across some of the spaces that are 100" rather than 102" in width9 I think it benefits all of us to provide the maximum number of underground spaces as long as they are functional The attached pictures indicate that the spaces are all useable and well utilized. -As Joe Wyeth, Dick Ward, Bill Szymanski and I have discussed on numerous occasions, the curb cut at the Southwest entrance to the lower parking lets and underground parking garage will be finalized in the Spring The cut will match the design requested by Bill during our December meeting at the site. The marks made by Bill are still on the ground In the meantime there are concrete curb stops laid along the ground adjacent to Bill's handiwork. Skip Mclellan at Fitzpatrick/Llewellyn uses "templates" to design the curb cots. Skip tells me the difference between his drawing and Bill's "in the field layout" is two to three feet, much of which is taken up in the radius. -I will formally request that John Larkin request Skip Mcleilan to drawing in the bike rack in front of Mcdonald's. -To the best of nay knowledge there has been no change in the coverage ratios Please let me know if you find differently. The variance does not occur on the parcel I control, 1 will direct your 2117 Dorset Street • Shelburne, Vermont 05482 • (802) 985-9446 E_t3it'�i'1y95 12b'�.1u"6 JIFF`r' ! UEE F'r;i�E=t3 comments regarding this particular issue to John Larkin. -A final plat will be submitted to your offices in the Spring showing all of the landscaping as it exists at that time; please be aware that in the Spring not all of the landscaping Arill be completed on the site Please do not hesitate to call my offices if YOU have any further questions or comments.Thank you for your efforts on our behalf. r Preliminary Memo - City Engineer February 21, 1995 agenda items February 2, 1995 Page 2 MUNSON PROPERTY - 364 DORSET STREET 1. Plan should have a title also names of adjacent owners. 2. The 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM employee parking along the south side is of little value if the businesses served are open late in the evenings, such as the convenience store. 3. The four (4) parking spaces along the Dorset Street frontage should be eliminated and the area landscaped. 4. Schedule specifies 15 parking spaces along the north side, plans show 13. L & M PARK - FAYETTE ROAD 1. The street entrance to the building parking lot is yet to be modified to conform to the plans. They have placed concrete bumpers so as to control the road opening. I assume they will install the permanent concrete curbs when the weather permits. % �125 1 TIA" %lIP TO I City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 24, 1995 Gregg Beldock 2117 Dorset Street Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: Site Revisions , L & M Park Dear Mr. Beldock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans no later than Friday, March 3, 1995. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, / . 1�,�A Y Rat mdnd J. Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/peh pc: L & M Partnership Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Date a pages► ToC���� From Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # 6. Landscaping/Office Dated 2-9-95 Williston Road 7. Acceptable Retail Building 2 Corporate Way Acceptable L & M Park Fayette Road Acceptable Dated 2-2-95 Dated 2-1-95 Project No. 88047 �� nnn► ► pn►► nn►►►nn►►►u►►►► itnu► a nun nuu a►► allnnn►u►►n►iun\ Z r x i�Z l L j ✓ PC = +66.01 Cie--o L -' I unnumm�nu► unnnuunuu►►►►►►n+muu ► ► uu► �n s i nuu►un►►n+►►►►►►►►►►►►+uunu►►►►u►►n►►►►in►►►unmu�,.,...... ...... / I >i. j i �:7117141HIW4YWi7J 1111111 t1111fllllll iflff111 Ni17f7111711 q/if�fAlflryrlf ����i`\- � f111 1111JU/illiltirt 1 ` lour 1 Nfa IN71f1/tlfl y11g1111tHQ11lINlAH71i9NlOuuUIIII�i111N11tUlrll _1`` fllrfkt �• / � ` �; � �" �trfrr,l J brf+Jlh �L jj NN hz Sll .y e CC \ � -... ,•F.�uc.•— r fw y Of -13 February 8, 1995 Mr. Dick Ward, Zoning Administrator South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 In re: Bananas University, a.k.a. L and M Park Commercial Subdivision Dear Dick, Our office recently completed an as built drawing of the parking constructed in association with Gregg Beldock's commercial construction at L and M Park. This plan showed that the parking layout as built was different from the approved plan in that a greater number of parking spaces were actually provided in the garage. This was accomplished by varying from the standard 9 foot by 20 foot parking spaces normally required. I would like to encourage you to consider accepting these spaces as built for the following reasons: The parking spaces as built conform to the space dimensions recommended by the Parking Consultants Council of the National Parking Association. These standards, reprinted from the "Parking Structures; Recommended Practice for Design and Construction" manual, 1988 edition, are attached. 2. Parking spaces within parking structures operate under ideal conditions compared to outdoor spaces. The high quality and level of lighting, and consistently dry pavement, allow use of narrower spaces without the limitations of snow and ice. The cost of constructing structured parking is several times the cost of a typical outdoor space. It is good policy to encourage the development of structured parking both practically and aesthetically. If minor variations from the normal standard yield additional structured parking, and that in turn reduces the cost per space for indoor parking, it is likely that allowing such deviations will promote use of structured parking. Please review the attached standards. I am sure Mr. Beldock is eager to complete this process, and would be happy to answer any questions you may have regarding this issue. Very truly yours Greg Rab' u • Precast Prestressed Concrete Pa-Jng Structures: Recommended Practice for Design and Construction With the popularity of vans and over -height recreational vehicles, some parking structures are developed with special high clearance areas. Often this is done on the first or grade tier, where the grade slab can be lowered to create the additional clear height required. Generally for pas- senger vehicles a 7'-0" minimum clear height is used, although 7'-4" to 7'-8" may provide a more spacious feeling. For over -height vehicles, 8'-6" to 9'-0" is often used. Height clearances on ramp breaks should be checked from the wheel line, not from the floor surface (Figure 2-23). 2.5 Parking Space and Module Design The most efficient parking structure in terms of square feet per space is not necessarily developed with a 90-degree parking stall. Properly designed angle parking layouts with one-way end crossovers are often more efficient than 90-degree layouts (Figure 2-28). The ease of parking in a one-way traffic angle parking layout often offsets any decrease in ef- ficiency when compared to 90-degree parking. Parking space width and parking module (bumper wall to bumper wall dimension) can vary depending on the level of comfort desired. Some parking structure designers choose to provide separate spaces for large and small cars while other designers choose to use the "one -size -fits -all" parking space concept. It is not uncommon to see a one -size -Pits -all parking space of 8'-6" (Figures 24 and 25) in width compared to it large car space of 9'-0" wide and a small car space of 7'-6" wide (Figure 2-26). The ratio of large cars to small cars will vary in different locations in North America. Most zoning codes require special spaces for vehicles used by the hand- icapped. Generally these spaces are 12'-0" wide and are placed near the elevators or on the first tier of the structure (Figure 2-27). Even with the "one -size -fits -all" concept, it is common to place SCO (small car only) spaces at the end of parking rows adjacent to turns to in- sure that a large vehicle does not project into the drive lane (Figure 2-28). The vehicle turnover in a parking space is a factor in selecting parking space width. A low turnover facility for all -day packers may have an 8'-2" width; 8'-6" may be provided for an average turnover and 8'-10" for a turnover of more than five vehicles per day. Parking space module and space dimensions as recommended by the Parking Consultants Council of the National Parking Association are shown on Table 2-1. Note that where large and small cars are [nixed, a one -size -fits -all space is developed which is determined by the weighted average of the small and large car space dimensions. &W o _191M�► Figure 2.22 TRUE VEHICLE CLEARANCE DJ - FLOOR O TO CEILING Figure 2-23 Pa e 12 Table 2-2 Typical Parking Dimensions Small Cars Interlock Vehicle Aisle Atwlc Reduction Overhang Projection Width Module Widths 1 o VP AW W1 WZ W3 W4 W5 45 2'-0" I'-5" I5'-3" II'-6" 26'-9" 42'-0" 40'-0" 39'-0" 39'-2" 50 I'-10" I'-6" I5'-9" 12'-0" 27'-9" 43"-6" 41'-8" 39'-10" 40'-6" 55' 1'-8" I'-8" 16'-1" 12'-10" 28'-1I" 45'-0" 43'-4" 41'-9" 41' 8" 00` 1'-5" I' �)" 16'4" 13'-4" 29'-8" 46'-0" 44'-7" 43'-2" 42'-6" 65^ 16'-6" 14'-0" 30'-6" 47'-0" 45'-10" 44'-8" 43' 4" 70' I'-0" I -11" 16'-7" 14'-10" 31' 5" 48'-0" 47'-0" 46'-0" 44'-2" T; 0' 9" I' -I I" 16'-0" 16'-0" 32'-6" 48"_3.. 47'-6" 45'-2'. ill. 0'-0" 2'-0" I S 6" - 20'-0" 35 _6" Ipo 51 -0' 51 -0" 47'-0" Lark Cars Interlock Vehicle Aisle Am lr Reduction Overhang Projection Width Module Widths i o VP AW W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 45" 2'-4" 2' 1" 18'-0" 13'-0" 3l'-0" 49'-0" 46'-8" 44'-4" 44,-10" 50' 2'-1" 2'-4" 18'-8" 13'-8" 32'-4" 51' 0" 48'-11" 46'-10" 46'_4" 55' 1'-10" 2'-5" 19'-2" 14'-8" 23'-10" 53'-0" 5V-2" 49' 4" 48'-2" 60' 1' 8" 2'-7" 19'-6" 16'-0" 35'-6" 55'-0" 53'-4" 51'-8" 49'-10" 65" 1'-4" 2' 9" 19'-9" 17'-0" 36'-9" 56'-6" 55'-2" 53'-10" 5l'-0" 70- I'-1" 2'-10" 19'-10" 18' 4" 38'-2" 59'-0" 56'-11" 55'-10" 52'-4" 0'-10" 2'-I I" 19'-9" 20'-0" 39'-9" 59'-6" 58'-8" 57'-10" 53' 8" 0' 0" 3' 0" 18'-8" 24'-8" 43'-4" 62'-0" 62'-0" 62'-0" 56'-0" 9 Parking angle w, W1 Parking module width (wall to wall), single loaded aisle W2 Parking module width (wall to 5 wall), double loaded aisle 16'-0" W3 Parking module width (wall to interlock), double loaded aisle a — £ W4 Parking module width (interlock to —� interlock), double loaded aisle W5 Parking module width VP AW VP (curb to curb), double loaded aisle wz AW Aisle width w3 WP Stall width parallel to aisle VP Projected vehicle length measured perpendicular to aisle w4 St Stall length va Sw Stall width o Overhang clearance i Interlock reduction Page 17 Precast Prestressed Concrete Parking Structures: Recommended Practice for Design and Construction 1975 1985 Vigure 2-29 0 60' 70' fat 8'-4 1/4- 6 SPACES 0 9'-0" USE OF SMALL 60' = 7 SPACES 0 CAR ONLY SPACES 8'-4 1/2- x 70' Figure 2-28 Figure 2-30 fare 1.1 Precast Prestressed Concrete Parking Structures: Recommended Practice for Design and Construction Table 2-1 RECOMMENDED MINIMUM PARKING SPACE WIDTH AND MODULE DIMENSIONS FOR PARKING FACILITY DESIGN 1. FOR SEPARATED SMALL CAR/LARGE CAR DESIGNS: Parking Space Width Type of User Small Car 7'-4" Large Car 8'-2" All day parker (employee, resident, etc.) Visitor 7'4" 8'-6" (hospital, central business district) High turnover 8'-0" 8'-10" (shopping, bank, etc.) Wall to Wall Module Angle Small Car Large Cur 45' 42'-0" 49'-0" 50' 43'-6" 51'-0" 55' 45'-0" 53'-0" 60' 46'-0" 55'-0" 65' 47'-0" 56'-6" 70' 48'-0" 58'-0" 75' 49'-0" 59'-6" 90° 5 IA" 62'-0" Adjustments to Modules: I) if a curb, wheel stop, wall or other vehicle restraint is placed at every parking space, the modules above can be reduced by IA". 2) For each I" additional space width, the module may be reduced 3" to maintain the same level of comfort. 2. FOR ONE -SIZE -FITS -ALL DESIGNS: Use weighted average of above dimensions, i.e., for 60% large cars and 40% small cars in a high turnover situation: Space width = 0.60 (8.83) + 0.40 (8.0) = 8.498' or 8'-6" Wall-to-wall module = 0.60 (62.0) + 0.40 (51.0) = 57.6', say 58'-0" Page 16 STEVEN F. STITZEL PATTI R. PAGE- DIANNE L. KENNEY LAURIE A. LCCLAIR MARK F.. WARD (*AI.50 AIIMI11'VA) IN N.Y.) STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 February 6, 1995 Diane A. Lavallee, Clerk Chittenden Superior Court PO Box 187 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: City of South Burlington v. Fayette, et al. Docket No. S0887-94CnC Dear Diane: OF COUNSEL. ARTHUR W.CERNOSIA RORF,RT E. FLETCHER I have enclosed a Notice of Dismissal for filing in the above -referenced matter. Very truly yours, Steven F. Stit el SFS/smw SON1604.cor #2771 Enclosure cc: Raymond J. Belair Stephen R. Crampton, Esq. STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, ) Plaintiff, ) V. ) JAMES J. FAYETTE, JOHN P. ) LARKIN and GERALD C. MILOT, ) d/b/a LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP) and GREGG BELDOCK, ) Defendants. ) CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT Docket No. S0887-94 CnC NOTICE OF DISMISSAL NOW COMES the City of South Burlington, by and through its attorneys, Stitzel & Page, P.C. and hereby dismisses the above - captioned action pursuant to V.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(i). G Dated at Burlington, Vermont this I. day of February, 1995. STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. Attorneys for City of South Burlington By: Steven F. Stitz 1 STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT IA' SON219 . lit 171 BATTERY STREET BURNNGTON. VERMONT 05401 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: I a. Owner of record L / P , ��t �k 1 b . Applicant � J c . Contact _� t+� �� 2) Purpose, location, including number use(s). I and nature of subdivision or development, of lots, units, or parcels and proposed .U'D/ 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. -k' 4) Names of owners of record of jall contiguous properties Pb 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. such z e�I�IL�I 6) Proposed extension, facilities such as storm drainage, etc. relocation, or modification of municipal sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the -proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8 1/2 x 11, 8 1/2 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the follow- ing information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belong- ing to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. 4) Type of location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. (Signa ure plicant o co tact person Date 2 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURL GTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION IIIInn y 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) wl _ Pr't"7`& e/-,- Lf 2) APPLICANT ( name , address, phone A 3) CONTACT PERSO • Sb d&V l 3 (name, address, ph11o''ne S� �_, �� _ ll�t- �S a i ��Z��3� 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ? CIE ♦r; 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable)'4 6) PROPOSED USE(S) �c 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9) LOT COVERAGE: building -'%; landscaped areas % building, parking, o side storage % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ , Landscaping $ Other Site Improvements (please list frith cost) $ 11) ESTIMATED P OJECT COMPLETION DATE: 12) ESTIMATED 'AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and u t ) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the fo lowing hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. ; 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14) PEAK D YS OF OPERATION: DATE OPF �S BMISSION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE OF HEARING STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE* DIANNE L. KENNEY LAURIE A. LeCLAIR MARK B. WARD (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) January 23, 1995 Raymond J. Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: South Burlington v. Fayette, et al. Dear Ray: OF COUNSEI, ARTHUR W.CERNOSIA ROBERT E.FLETCHER In June I began a zoning enforcement action against the Larkin/Milot commercial PUD because of the developer's failure to pay permit fees. At this time we should dismiss this action unless there is some other violation which must be pursued. Very truly yours, lie Steven F. P!tzelX SFS/smw SON1592.cor # 2 7 7 1 Y Precast Prestressed Concrete Parking Structures: Recommended Practice for Design and Construction Table 2-1 RECOMMENDED MINIMUM PARKING SPACE WIDTH AND MODULE DIMENSIONS FOR PARKING FACILITY DESIGN 1. FOR SEPARATED SMALL CAR/LARGE CAR DESIGNS: Parking Space Width Type of User Small Car 7'-4" Large Car 8'-2" All day parker (employee, resident, etc.) Visitor 7'-8" 8'-6" (hospital, central business district) High turnover 8'-0" 8'-10" (shopping, bank, etc.) Wall to Wall Module Angle ----- Small Car Large Car ----- 45° 42'-0" 49'-0" 50° 43'-6" 51'-0" 55° 45'-0" 53'4" 60° 46'-0" 55'-0" 65° 47'-0" 56'-6" 70° 48'4" 58'-0" 75° 49'-0" 59'-6" 90° 51'-0" 62'4" Adjustments to Modules: 1) if a curb, wheel stop, wall or other vehicle restraint is placed at every parking space, the modules above can be reduced by V-0". 2) For each I" additional space widift, the module may be reduced 3" to maintain the same level of comfort. 2. FOR ONE -SIZE -FITS -ALL DESIGNS: Use weighted average of above dimensions, i.e., for 60% large cars and 40% small cars in a high turnover situation: Space width = 0.60 (8.83) + 0.40 (8.0) = 8.498' or 8'-6" Wall-to-wall module = 0.60 (62.0) + 0.40 (51.0) = 57.6, say 58'-0" Page 16 o C- Table 2-2 Typical Parking Dimensions Small Cars Interlock Vehicle Aisle Angle Reduction Overhang Projection Width Module Widths i o VP AW Wt W2 W3 W4 W5 45' 2'-0" 1'-5" 15'-3" 11'-6" 26'-9" 42'-0" 40' 0" 38' 0" 39'-2" 50' 1'-10" 1'-6" 15'-9" 12'-0" 27'-9" 43'-6" 41'-8" 39'-10" 40'-6" 55' 1'-8" 1'-8" 16'-1" 12'-10" 28'-11" 45'-0" 43'-4" 41'-8" 41'-8" 60' 1'-5" 1' 9" 16' 4" 13' 4" 29' 8" 46'-0" 44'-7" 43'-2" 42'-6" 65' 1'-2" 1'-l0" 16'-6" 14'-0" 30'-6" 47'-0" 45'-10" 44'-8" 43'-4" 70' 1'-0" l'-I1" 16'-7" 14'-10" 31'-5" 48'-0" 47'-0" 46'-0" 44'-2" 75' 0'-9" 1'-1 r, 16'-6" 16'-0" 32'-6" 49'-0" 48'-3" 47'-6" 45'-2" 90, 0'-0" 2'-0" 15'-6" 20'-0" 35'-6" 51'-0" 51 A" 51'-0" 47'-0" Large Cars Interlock Vehicle Aisle Angle Reduction Overhang Projection Width Module Widths i o VP AW W1 W2 W3 W4 WS 45' 2'-4" 2'-1" 18'-0" 13'-0" 31'-0" 49'-0" 46'-8" 44'-4" 44'-10" 50' 2'-1 " 2'-4" 18'-8" 13'-8" 32'-4" 51'-0" 48'-1 1" 46'-10" 46'-4" 55' 1'-10" 2'-5" 19'-2" 14'-8" 23'-10" 53'-0" 51'-2" 49'-4" 48'-2" 60' 1'-8" 2'-7" 19'-6" 16'-0" 35'-6" 55'-0" 53'-4" 5V-8" 49'-10" 65' 1'-4" 2'-9" 19'-9" 17'-0" 36'-9" 56'-6" 55'-2" 53'-10" 51'-0" 70' 1'-1" 2'-10" 19'-10" 18'4" 38'-2" .58'-0" 56'-II" 55'-10" 52'-4" 75° 0%10" 2'-I1" 19'-9" 20'-0" 39'-9" 59'-6" 58'-8" 57'-10" 53'-8" 90' 0'-0" 3'-0" 18'-8" 24'-8" 43'-4" 62'-0" 62'-0" 62'-0" 56'-0" 9 Parking angle Wt Parking module width (wall to wall), single loaded aisle W2 Parking module width (wall to wall), double loaded aisle W3 Parking module width (wall to interlock), double loaded aisle W4 Parking module width (interlock to interlock), double loaded aisle W5 Parking module width (curb to curb), double loaded aisle AW Aisle width WP Stall width parallel to aisle VP Projected vehicle length measured perpendicular to aisle St, Stall length Sw Stall width o Overhang clearance i Interlock reduction Page 17 \ f 4.6 PARKING SPACES AND PASSENGER LOADING 'ZONES — _ Nil AllZl-1986 4.5 Ground and Floor Surfaces 4.5.1* General. Ground and floor surfaces along accessible routes and in accessible rooms and spaces, including floors, walks, ramps, stairs, and curb ramps, shall be stable, firm, and slip resistant, and shall comply with 4.5. 4.5.2 Changes in Level. Changes in level up to '/a in (6 mm) may be vertical and without edge treat- ment. Changes in level between %4 in and %2 in (6 min and 13 mm) shall be beveled with a slope no greater than 1:2 (see Fig. 7(c) and (d)). Changes in level greater than t/2 in (13 mm) shall be accomp- lished by means of a ramp that complies with 4.7 or 4.8. 4.5.3* Carpet. if carpet or carpet tile is used on a ground or floor surface, then it shall be seeurcly attached; have a firm cushion, pad, or backing or no cushion or pad, and have a level loop, textured loop, level cut pile, or level cut/uncut pile texture. 'The maximum pile height shall be %2 in (13 min). Exposed edges of carpet shall be fastened to floor surfaces and have trim along the entire length of the exposed edge. Carpet edge trim shall comply with 4.5.2. 4.5.4 Gratings. 11' gratings are located in walking surfaces, then they shall have spaces no greater than %2 in (13 mm) wide in one direction. If grat- ings have elongated openings, then they shall be Placed so that the long dimension is perpendicular to the dominant direction of travel. 4.6 Parking Spaces and Passenger Loading Jones 4.6.1 General. Accessible parking spaces shall comply with 4.6.2. Accessible passenger loading zones shall comply with 4.6.3. Parking spaces designated for physically handi- capped people and accessible passenger loading zones that serve a particular building shall be locat- ed on the shortest possible accessible circulation route to an accessible entrance of the building. In separate parking structures or lots that do not serve a particular building, parking spaces for physically handicapped people shall be located on the shortest possible circulation route to an accessible pedestri- an entrance of the parking facility. 4.6.2* Parking Spaces. Parking spaces for physi- cally handicapped people shall be at least 96 in (2440 mm) wide and shall have an adjacent access "tirr :\t,pcu.lix G.,r aJ�liiiunal inluniu�liui�. 28 aisle 60 in (1525 mm) wide minimum (see Fig. 9). Parking access aisles shall be part of the accessible route to the building or facility entrance and shall comply with 4.3. Two accessible parking spaces may share a common access aisle. Parked vehicle overhangs shall not reduce the clear width of an accessible circulation route. Accessible parking spaces shall be designated as reserved for physically handicapped people by a sign showing the symbol of' accessibility (see 4.28.5). Such signs shall not be obscured by a vehi- cle parked in the space. 4.6.3 Passenger Loading Zones. Passenger load- ing zones shall provide an access aisle at least 48 in (1220 mm) wide and 20 ft (6 m) long adjacent and parallel to the vehicle pull-up space (see Fig. 10). 11• c E Q0 "' r) rn ACCESSIBLE ROUTE _+ a o a u e a n n 0 a u a a40M a a �--- ACCESS 96 min60 min AISLE 2440 � 1525t 252 min 6400 Fig. 9 Dintcnsions of Parking Spaces c 240 min E o 6100 00 t t Fig. 10 Access Aisle al Passenger Loading; Zones A 11 RAO D 1 C i�f e Gregg B e I d o c k January 17, 1995 To: Gerry Milot John Larkin Enclosed please find a copy of the as built parking layout at Bananas University/ Discovery Zone Retail Center. It is my understanding that The City of South Burlington wants a final plan, encompassing the entire P.U.D., reflecting the as built of the entire project. Sincerely, I Drug Fitzpatrick Joe Weith Dick Ward 2117 Dorset Street 9 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 • (802) 985-9446