HomeMy WebLinkAboutBatch - Supplemental - 0221 0223 Airport ParkwayI
Memorandum
October 2,
September
Page 2
- Planning
1990 agenda items
28, 1990
Sewer: This project requires a total sewer allocation of 65,375
gpd. As discussed in my memo dated 9/18/90, when including the
58,490 gpd which was allocated for this project i ' n January, 1990,
the resulting uncommitted reserve capacity at the Bartlett Bay
Treatment facility is -6,938 gpd.
i
Design Permitted Flow 800,000 gpd
12 Month Average flow (9//1/89 -
8/31/90) 717,000 gpd
Commitments Against Reserve
(including L & M Park) 89,938 gpd
- 6,938 gpd
Since this is a revised Preliminary Plat, the approved allocation
can be revised. I recommend approval for a sewer allocation of
65,375 gpd. 51,552 gpd can be used immediately and the remaining
13,823 gpd will be placed on a waiting list. The 13,823 gpd will
be number 2 on the waiting list (Lakewood Commons is number one).
This project involves the subdivision of two (2) adjacent lots at
221 and 223 Airport Parkway. These lots have frontage on both
Airport Parkway and Kirby Road. The proposal is to subdivide
these lots into three (3) lots, two (2) of the lots will be
fronting on Airport Parkway and (1) of the lots will be fronting
on Kirby Road.
Area & Dimensions: This property is located within the R4 zone.
The two (2) existing lots are each developed with a two-family
dwelling. The minimum lot size for a two-family dwelling in this
zone is 12,000 square feet and the minimum frontage requirements
is 100 feet (Airport Parkway is arterial and/or collector
street).
2
I
Memorandum - Planning
October 2, 1990 agenda items
September 28, 1990
Page 3
The two (2) new lots along Airport Parkway on which the two-
family dwellings are situated will each be 12,000 square feet
and therefore meet the minimum lot size. These lots will not
meet the minimum width requi3�ement since lot #223 will have only
87.46 feet of frontage and Iot #221 will have only 73.1 feet of
frontage. The proposed lot frontages on Airport parkway are
identical to the lot frontages of the existing lots. Therefore,
since the substandard frontages are existing, no variance is
required. The remaining lot along Kirby Road will be 29,984 feet
(.68A) and have 223.51 feet of frontage along Kirby Road.
The dwelling on lot #221 does not presently meet the side yard
setback on the westerly side. This subdivision will bring this
setback into compliance. Both buildings will remain noncomplying
because neither building complies with the front yard setback
requirement.
Dgnsitv:. The total area of both existing lots is 1.22 acres
which under the R4 zone allows a maximum of 4.88, or five (5),
dwelling units. Since the property is already developed with
four (4) units, it is the staff's position that if this subdivi-
sion were approved, only (1) dwelling unit could be placed on
the .68 acre lot.
Topography: The entire .68 acre lot is a deep ravine with steep
slopes on either side. Major site modification would be required
to develop this lot (see Bill Szymanski's memo).
Coverage; All lots meet coverage requirements.
Conservation Zone: Based on observation, a minor stream begins
on this property. A stream is also shown in this location on the
City's base map. Minor streams require a 50 foot setback (no
building, no fill). This, combined with normal setbacks, results
in the lot being undevelopable. See enclosed Sketch A.
Other: The plat should indicate that the existing structures are
duplexes.
3
M E M 0 R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer
Re: October 2, 1990 agenda items
Date: September 29, 1990
5) ADAMS AIRPO PARKWAY, 3-LOT SUBDIVISION
1. Any construction on new lot should require site plan review.
2. A portion of Kirby Road sheet drains toward this ravine. A
20 foot wide drainage easement should be set off from Kirby Road
boundary to the bottom of the ravine (90' + long). The location
will depend on the proposed building. This easement will allow
for future construction of a storm drain system on Kirby Road.
6) P PLACE (MYERS PROPERTY) DORSE STREET
1. Sewer easements shall be 15' in width minimum. It should
also include the connection to Indian Creek MH #6.
2. If there is a street in Burlington named "Park" this name
should be changed. Street of the same name causes confusion.
3. Street lights shall be of the type that Green Mountain Power
will accept and maintain for the City.
4. The location of the street light standards should be across
the street because they are to close to the watermain.
5. Sidewalks shall be 5 feet in width, concrete 5 inches in
thickness except in driveways where the thickness shall be 8
inches.
6. Road pavement shall include 2 inches of base course and 1
inch of surface course placed one year after the base course is
placed.
it-��-ntttb T-Litirlington Ylirr 143cpartmcnt
'75 :
��,tiitllj Tihirlinilton. licrinout 1154113 1
(802) 658-7960
To; South Bu&tington Ptanning Commizzion
F&om: Chie6 Goddette
Re; Tue4dau Octobe& 2,,1990 Agenda Items
Date; Tuesday Septembe& 11,1990
Hans wete )Leviewed by this depa&tment on the
1001 Douet Stxeet deveZopment catted Pa&k Hace and the
2211223 Aixpott Paxkway sub-divizion. I am pteazed to injokm
you that I do not Zee a ptobtem 6ok emekgency ptotection
6o& both p&ojectz.
I
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
September 28,'1990
I
Mr. John Steel
Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates
One Wentworth Drive
Williston, Vermont 05495
Re: 3-Lot Subdivision, Airport Parkway
Dear John:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission
meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also en-
closed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments.
Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 2, 1990 at
7:30 P.M. to represent your request.
Sincerely,
Joe Weith,
City Planner
Encls
cc: Paul Adams
JW/mcp
I
7tn
o 0
vv/o
PLANNER
658-7955
I
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
I September 13, 1990
Mr. Lance Llewellyn
Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates
One Wentworth Drive
Williston, Vermont 05495
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Re: Paul G. Adams, Three (3) Lot Subdivision, Airport Parkway
Dear Mr. Llewellyn:
Enclosed for your review, please find preliminary comments on the
above referenced project from the Planning staff, Chief Goddette,
and Bill Szymanski. Should you have any questions, please feel
free to contact me.
Sincere
Fl�y
7'7 a'-
RaZo4nd 1J. �BLjel
Zoning and Planning Assistant
Encls
RJB/mcp
Preliminary Report L October 2, 1990 Agenda
1) ALAN PALMER - 10 UNIT PUD-R - FINAL PLAT
Information missing from the Final Plat:
Symbols from legend.
Proposed name of new street.
Revised plans have been reviewed by the Natural Resources Commit-
tee at their meeting held on September 11, 1990. They will be
submitting comments which will be forwarded to the applicant.
PVUL Q_. ADAMS - 3 LOT SUBDIVISION :-- SKETCH PL
Additional information required on sketch plan:
Name and address of the owner of record and applicant.
Indicate use of each existing building.
Show driveways, parking and outside storage areas.
It is suggested that due to the topography of the lot that
contours be shown on the plan.
It is the staff's position that only one (1) dwelling unit could
be placed on the new .68A lot since the maximum density is 4
units per acre and the total area of the subdivision is 1.24
acres (5 units allowed and 4 units are existing).
M E M 0 R A N D U M
To: Joe Weith, City Planner
From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer
Re: October 2, 1990 agenda items
Date: September 14, 1990
PA PLACE (MYERS PROPERTY1 DORSE STREET
1. Sewer pipe shall be bedded in crushed stone (3/4 inch maxi-
mum).
2. Storm sewer pipe material shall be plastic oir concrete not
metal or aluminum.
3. Storm sewer inlets shall be adjusted using precast concrete
risers not bricks and mortar.
4. Water pipe fittings shall be wrapped with polyethylene where
concrete thrust blocks are used.
5. Sidewalk along Indian Creek Drive shall be constructed one
foot from property line.
6. Sewer easement shall be 15 feet in width.
221-223 AIRPOR PARKWAY, 3-LOT SUBDIVISION
A lot is created in a very deep ravine. Any building within this
new lot should require site plan review.
(]1T ()I' !KxUD\ |lUk|.|N(>UN
SuJx(iviL;_Lun SVJ�.'1K211 LtJUN
l) Nuoe, aUJcu:�;u, .'nJ [dI01/0 nmW/uc ut�
a, [wxnoc u[ record Pa 11
l2
_
b' ApplluL-InLPaul
_-___~
Budingt?[l,,_Vernoo[t 05
h.[rive�_-_____._-_--_-_--_---' -'-
---_-___- _Wjjjistoh. 'l/e[nluDt'-U2A��---_--_'__8Z�=��U�---_-- --
2) lluqx)-ae, ]iuv', au^{ ruLo/, OF /.u|x1ivLSux/ Of Jevuloom�nL, i/,Clux|i/v]
nm/dx^r u[ ioL';, uoiL1;, w/ LS .xx| |xusc(S)'
_Combination of two existing lot �_owned.by_Paul Adamsinto -
------`---`--------------``---`--`` --`-----' -------------- --
u' iy (|.r uYALu/o, etc) _
_Fec 5i
4u[ .xyvo/s or rec*/d o| ./|l '(v/i /`}L^x/,, |"'qr/U,s
_ (9G/l3) ' --_----- -'-_-_ ---_---_
'|\1x/ oL L�s/�Lu/q or lxo4x,,_-,(�d 'x/ l)I()[x`/ty 'uc|' .0
covu/vinL.,; L Lcj>/L; '`i W,'y, ,(c.
None Found
I
III-otused exLell.sjoli, f(A.(x'-.I( loll, ()l jaxill
SLICh A�-; SMI.I.Lary :�('WL-r' W0141 '.111)[dy, �ALL'(AS, SL01`IIl Cil-i-dild(JU, (-'LC:.
Hly 1)I(2Vi.OLIS LK-tions LA(-n hy Hit- Zonin(j !kx-trd of Adjl-ISUW�flt of:
by t1I(-' SOLIth BI-Irlill(jt011 L'Lulranq Cunwiss�on which affect ffie, j)fOj--)C)StX1
(II.ViL-Jon, and incLude t--11(' Of I.AlCh 1-1(-'Liow�:
1'01-11- Of Ll �!k('t-Ch 1)1,111 '-111OWL11� I 1 -1,01-1:
W I I )(I III] A
I ) Nl-ijw, of owner,; of record (A- (--()fit i(itiow; pi ()[)('I I-
2) Lk)uilclk-�Irius and 1-11-ea 01-: (k:I) I [ I (-,'of it 1,11 Id Ix- 1 ()11(1 111(1 1 () owlIcT of-
feeord 11-ICI (h) [-)FO[XC('C1 ;LIWIVI�A()II.
1-1yout- ()I piojx�l Ly I III(,,,; typ(- wd I,x',i I )JI ()I
3 1 �Xis till(i 1-irld Pr()p(-),;(2d -1
exiL11:111(.1 '-Ind p) ICL 1011,; (AI 1,111d , 'AH :11 � 1: 1 1 �,i:A'M(1 It Ind (-()Vk-
n�ll 11:!; .
4) Of, 10CI-ItiUll, WICI (d (,X[:;l 111() '110
alld upen sp"ic(2.
Date, tt'l-10 nocth arrow Ond -�;c,tl(-, (IlLilk-I W,1-1 jIld kit
6) Loc,ition nup, showinq relat-101-1 ()1 10 ddJ1I(-.C'fIt-- jA(.)[-)ol-(1Y
alld ��Urroundinq
L
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
January 9, 1991
Mr. Paul Adams
P.G. Adams, Inc.
1215 Airport Parkway
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Warehouse Building, Lot 42, Airport Parkway
Dear Mr. Adams:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the October 16, 1990 Planning Commission meeting
minutes. Please meet the stipulations contained in the approval
motion before applying for a building permit. Please call if you
have any questions.
�ivcer(4y.,
V'�' " (L
//Joe Weith,
City Planner
I Encl
JW/mcp
cc: John Steele
PLANNING COMMISSION
2 OCTOBER 1990
page 9
issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
9. The applicant shall submit to CWD prior to Final Plat revised
hydrant typicals for approval.
10. A sewer allocation of 65,375 qpd is granted. This assumes 52,000
qpd for the residential portion and 12,875 cfpd for the commercial
portion. Due to limited sewer gapacity at the Bartlett Bay Treatment
facility, only 51,552 qpd is available at this time. This project
will be placed on a waitincr list for the remaining 13,823 qlDd until
such time as sufficient capacity is available as determined by the
City Planner. 6,938 qpd shall be placed as #1 on the list and 6,885
(Tpd shall be #3 on this list.
11. The applicant shall contribute $15,995 to the Shelburne Road
Intersection Improvement Fund based on the 623 peak hour trip ends to
be generated by this project.
12. As represented by the applicant, the commercial portion of the
project is only conceptual at this time. Therefore, prior to
issuance of a building permit for any development in.the commercial
portion of the project, the applicant shall submit a revised final
Plat to the Planning Conunission for approval. This project is
approved for 468 commercial parking spaces and 673 total peak hour
trip ends. Future proposals shall conform to these standards.
13. This approval is contincfent upon the establishment of a
Tra ion Management Association (TMA) in accordance with the
do titled "Shelburne Road Corridor Transport�ation Manacfement
Asso6iation, Final Draft, August 1990." As expressly represented by
the applicant, the applicant shall fund the first 18 months of the
proposed Shelburne Road Corridor TMA. Prior to July 1, 1991, or as
determined at Final Plat, the applicant shall hire a program
coordinator, provide working space within the corridor, and establish
an account for the TMA.
14. A development phasing plan for the residential portion shall be
submitted prior to Final Plat.
15. The applicant shall be responsible for payincr for extension of
Fayette Road to Pomerleau property line. Method of securing payment
(e.g. bond, escrow, etc.) shall be dtermined prior to Final Plat,
16. The Final Plat application shall be submitted within 12 months or -
this approval is null and void.
Ms. Peacock seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-1.
5. Sketch Plan application of Paul Adams for a subdivision of 1.2
acres into three lots of 12,000 square feet, 12,000 square feet and
29,984 square feet, Airport Parkway and Kirby Road.
PLANNING COMMISSION
2 OCTOBER 1990
page 10
John Steele, of Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, representing Paul Adams
presented a plan showing lots 221 and 223, and how they would be
subdivided into three lots. Both the existing lots front on both
Airport Parkway and Kirby; the third lot to be created would front on
Firby P-,m�d and meets requirements in terms of its area. The reason
for subdividing is to realize development potential. -Mr. Steele
brought up several issues regarding this: one being the minor stream
designation which affects the co�nservation zone, the other being the
amount of development. Mr. Steele stated that Mr. Weith felt that by
the time they would get done with the subdivision only one more unit
would be able to be developed on the third lot.
Ms. Peacock asked Mr. Steele if he had been to the lot, which he had,
and suggested to him that it was fairly steep. Mr. Steele agreed.
Ms. Peacock also suggested that it is pretty close up to the road,
and she didn't understand how he could fit a house on it. Mr. Steele
said that he had not yet explored that with a developer.
Mr. Craig then said that he looked at the sketch map, and that by the
time the 50' setback and the minor stream were put in, it appears
that there was nothing left to develop on. Also, he had read the
subdivision regulations and part of the criteria is recognition of a
desirable relationship to the land. Mr. Craig said he felt that
development here seems to make no sense at all.
Mr. Steele said that this was why he wanted to focus on the
determination of a what constitutes a minor stream. Mr. Craig asked
Mr. Weith if he had been to the property and if he thought there was
a minor stream, defined as a defined channel with intermittent runoff
in the regulations. Mr. Weith said that there was, to that
definition. Mrs. Maher wanted to know what they were'being asked to
consider approving. Mr. Steele answered that he would like a
determination as to whether it is a minor stream. If it is, and the
regs are applied, nothing more can be done.
Mr. Austin said the Commission regularly gets applicants who have a
problem with the definition of a minor stream, but that they
shouldn't ask the Commission to ignore it.
Mr. Burgess said that he didn't think the Commission even has the
authority to overrule the City Planner, who considers there to be a
minor stream, and that he didn't think he would want to. Ms. Pugh
also agreed that this was a minor stream, and she wasn't sure why
they were even considering subdividing. Mr. Craig then said that
according to the Commission's,interpretation, there is a minor
stream, and Mr. Steele has a severe problem with that as well as how
much he could build on the lot regardless, considering the steep
slopes. Mr. Craig asked Mr. Weith if the stream were hypothetically
removed, what would they be able to build on the land. Mr. Weith
replied that a single-family structure could be built, based on the
density requirements.
There was some discussion as to whether they would be allowed to fill
PLANNING COMMISSION
2 OCTOBER 1990
page 11
in the lot and whether a zoning permit would be needed. Mr. Weith
said that filling in could be approved by the Board of Adjustment.
Mr. Llewellyn said that the entire lot wouldn't be filled; a hillside
ranch would be built.
Mrs. Maher -S-aid that there should be serious discussion regarding
minor streams and drainage areas because this is really penalizing
people and presenting a serious problem. Mr. Burgess said that the
suggestion to review this is a good one.
6. PUBLIC HEARING: Final Plat application of Alan Palmer for
construction of a 10 unit planned residential development in nine
buildincrs on a 4.9 acre parcel located at 1001 Dorset Street.
Mr. Palmer requested that this application be extended to the next
meeting.
Mrs. Maher moved for a continuance to next week. Mr. Craig seconded.
7. Status report on T-Model 2 traffic model:
a) City Center/Interchange Study
b) O'Dell Parkway
Mr. Weith presented an update on the T-Model at the City Center and
Interchange Study. This project is being prepared by RSG, who were
the ones who set up the T-Model for Chittenden County. They were
doing it largely for South Burlington Realty for their project in
the City Center. They are looking at more than jus,�t'their 30,000
square foot building, including future developments'because they are
interested in the City Center project. South Burlington is also
contributing money toward the study to carry it further to look at
interchange improvements, etc. This study is looking at base
conditions and also year 2000 conditions, through a 10-year growth
period. This is different from the JHK study that was done which
looked at future growth in 2000 also but land use information
included in there assumed full buildout of the City Center which is,
in Mr. Weith's opinion, unrealistic.
There are several scenarios to look at. The present results are very
preliminary. They have not started evaluating the interchanges. The
five scenarios are: 1989 base, what the LOS's are at the surrounding
intersections; year 2000 impact, but the year 2000 land use
information that is currently -in the T-Model has some problems, i.e.
the land use information developed by a lot of towns was more of a
wish list, including great growth in employment but little in
housing. Because T-Model is a production -oriented model that is
related to housing, the number of trips are based on the number of
housing units. What happened this first time is that in the year
2000 fewer trips are being seen, also less traffic in the City Center
than seen today, because trips are actually being sucked out of the
City Center to adjoining towns to the employment centers and retail
H
WVN
11
Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc.
P.O. Box 1629 Burhngton, Vermont 05402-1629
February 13, 1990
Mr. Joseph Weith
City of South Burlington
Planning Office
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vt. 05403
Re: Evaluation of Impact on Minor Stream
L & M Park
Dear Joe:
6?214J,Y?
r_d�
)nsulting geologists_
802-658-0820
FM, fA 19K
This letter is a follow-up to our meeting on February 5, 1990,
regarding our firm's evaluation of a small watercourse west of
Route 7 in South Burlington, and our assessment of the impact
from the proposed L & M Park on that watercourse.
First, we briefly discussed whether this particular watercourse
meets the City of South Burlington's Zoning Regulations'
definition of a minor stream (Section 21.133): "stream, water-
course, or drainageway having a clearly defined channel with
intermittent or full -year flow of water." Our discussion on this
topic was brief, because we both agreed that there is no
question that the watercourse in question meets this rather
all-inclusive definition.
As we also discussed, this definition seems unduly broad, since
essentially any low point in the topography that carries water
at any time of year, including the smallest of roadside ditches,
or shallow swales between neighboring backyards, would meet this
definition. Such a broad definition as this forces your office
either 'to require extensive buffer strips on essentially all
projects coming for your review, or to grant numerous waivers to
this rule, or to ignore the rule completely. None of these
options seem particularly palatable. An alternative might be to
break this minor stream' definition into two categories:
1. Minor Stream: A stream other than the three Major Streams
specifically named in the Zoning Regulations, having a
clearly defined channel, with flow for at least six
continuous months of an average hydrologic year, and
exhibiting aquatic ecologic characteristics of a stream
supporting aquatic biota;
2. Minor Drainageway: A watercourse with intermittent flows
occurring for less than six continuous months of a typical
hydrologic year, serving primarily to convey stormwater
and/or snow melt, and exhibiting few aquatic ecological
characteristics typical of a stream.
I would envision these Minor Drainageways having less
stringent requirefnents, such as: where possible and where
appropriate, a 251 buffer strip from the center of the
watercourse, or a 101 setback from the top of bank, or some
such more realistic set of requirements.
Regarding the specific watercourse in question (located south of
the Chrysler -Plymouth Dealership, and north of the Vermont
National Bank property), it appears to serve primarily to carry
stormwater runoff from the drainage network emptying into the
concrete culvert that outlets at the' immediate west side of
Rt. 7, and also runoff from the VNB and C-B properties and
parking lots. This water is carried westward to a more
substantial south -flowing stream that, in my mind, would be
benefited by the 1001 conservation zone (and would be classified
as a minor stream in my definition suggested above).
L & M Park has proposed a relocation of this smaller
westward -flowing watercourse, to slightly north of its current
route. I believe this channel relocation can be accomplished in
a way that would provide the same functions that the existing
watercourse now provides. Those existing functions are:
1. Hydraulics (the physical transport of stormwater); and
2. A limited amount of physical filtering of pollutants,
by means of flow through a partially -vegetated water
channel.
Our work with the design engineers, Fitzpatrick-Llewelyn, Inc.,
would be to provide design parameters, and to review proposed
design plans, so that these basic functions are met in the
realigned channel.
I do not feel that a full-blown aquatic ecological analysis of
this small watercourse is warranted, given the relatively short
length of proposed alterations (approximately 300 feet) and the
present encroachment on a 100 foot buffer zone by existing
parking lots and buildings on the VNB and C-B properties.
I woul'd expect our involvement in this evaluation would entail
expenditures of $1,000-$2,000, which would include preparation
of these design parameters, several design review meetings with
you and Fitzpatrick-Llewelyn, Inc., and possible attendance at
Planning commission meetings.
In addition to those expenditures, we would need a more accurate
topographic survey of this drainage swale and its surrounding
banks. on my site visit to this location on January 26, 1990,
it became apparent that the existing topographic map (based, I
believe, on an original topographic survey by Hamlin
Engineering) does not accurately reflect the location or depth
of the water cnannel, nor the locations and topography of the
Chrysler -Plymouth building or parking lot. To -properly design
an equally -functioning watercourse, an accurate topographic
survey must be available as a base.
As a separate issue, we would be glad to work further with the
Planning Commission to develop a refinement of the present
definitions and buffer requirements for major and minor streams.
sincerely,
Craig D. Heindel
Senior Hydrogeologist
CDH/c
cc: Lance Llewelyn
I
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7955 658-7958
Paul G. Adams
1215 Airport Parkway
South Burlington, Vermont
Re: 221 Airport Parkway
Dear Mr. Adams:
Enclosed are the agenda and my comments to the Planning
Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June
23, 1987 to represent your application.
Sincerely,
Kathryn Perkins,
Acting Planner
Kp/mcp
Encls
cc: Lance Llewellyn
M
0
R
A
N
D
U
M
To: The South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: June 23, 1987 agenda items
Date: June 19, 1987
3) BLODGETT DEVELOPMENT, SHELBURNE ROAD
1. Existing curb cuts on Shelburne Road shall be closed.
2. Holmes Road extension should dead end beyond entrance drive
and entrance should tee into it. The new street should include
curbs, sidewalk and centered within the planned rights -of -way.
3. There should be a sidewalk along Shelburne Road.
4. Site shall include storm water runoff control measures. A
drainage and erosion control study shall be conducted by Heindel
& Noyes and their recommendations shall be reviewed by the City
Engineer and followed.
4) IRISH ESTATE SUBDIVISION, ALLEN ROAD
1. Harbor Ridge Road shall be extended at least beyond the water
tank property and a turnaround constructed. This extension to be
constructed to City standards and deeded to the City.
6) PAUL ADAM� SUBDIVISION, AIRPORT PARKWAY, KIRBY ROAD
1. This parcel of land is a very deep wooded ravine. -Lot #2
would require a very large volume of fill material to make it
useable. This material would have to be hauled on local streets
especially Kirby Road resulting in damage to these street.
7) St. AMAND & ANDERSON, 59 SWIFT STREET
1. Extensive lot coverage by buildings and pavement will
increase drainage runoff. This increased runoff will drain upon
the adjacent property especially the property to the west and to
the north. I would recommend a piped system with a series Of
drop inlets to intercept surface and road runoff and outlet it to
the east.
I
Memorandum
June 23, 1987
Page 4
5) IRISH FARM, ALLEN ROAD
Tom Drollette proposes to subdivide three lotsp two at .51 acres
and one at .679 acres. The entire property is 39.3 acres. The
lots are zoned R-2.
A new road extending Harbor Ridge Road along the existing 50 foot
r.o.w. should be built to City standards to access these lots.
City water and sewer services should be extended from the new
Harbor Road extension for use by single-family homes.
All legal documents for the street, sewer ' and water lines should
be prepared for the City Attorney.'s review prior to Final Plat.
Other: See Bill Szymanski's comments
6) PAUL ADAMS, 921 AIRPORT PARKWAY
After visiting this site with Dick Ward, Zoning Administrator,
the proposed subdivision is not acceptable.
The new 129189 square foot lot sits in an approximately 40 - 50
foot deep ravine. The only level land is the City's r.o.w. along
Kirby Road. The applicant'plans to fill the lot to create a
buildable lot.
Other: See Bill Szymanski's comments
7) ST. AMAND & ANDERSON, 59 SWIFT STREET
Dr. St. Amand and Dr. Anderson propose to construct two mini -
storage buildings measuring 30 feet x 180 feet each for a total
of 10,800 square feet. The buildings will be 9 feet high.
The applicant will go before the Zoning Board to apply for a use
variance for this lot.
Access: The applicant proposes to access this development
through a 20 foot wide access drive located in the fifty foot
right-of-way from Swift Street.
Circulation: Circulation is shown completely around the two
buildings. It is not clear if the area is paved or graveled.
This should be discussed since neighbors are concerned about dust
control.
Parking: Parking will be in the aisles between and around the
two buildings. Loading and unloading will be done at this site
while the office business will be handled from the existing
4
CITY ()I-' ';OLJ'1'11 HURIANG'ION
SuIxiivi�.,31-on Api--dic"Ition - SKMU1 PtAN
Naiit-,, zaddre_-,,�, ind phone nmilx2r ot :
Li. Owner of rucc)rd --Paul G. Adams-----.
1215 AirDort Parkway —
South Burlington- Vernmnl_ 0 5403 Phone- 869-8
1). Applictint
U)IILICL P 1G. A
gw __ _d 5-
--Lance- A. -Llewellyn, P_E_
11 K 1 1, 1 U It 0 1 A 11 )d IV 1 1( )]1 01 1( �v( I opilk III L I IC i LI( I I 11(
Ul I J_ L: 3 ( ) I J.kil '( ' I , 11 It, I I )I k )I , 6( '( I U.A' (!_!) .
Two -1-ot subdivision- a-t-_221- Airport Parkway. One lot with- exist ing--dwe Ring -
Second lot is proposed for a residential -dwelling.
A] -)L) I [I L I I t I I L( 'It L_ I Il (ilk,, J)lc)IA'l t Y Ol. L I Ilf L U )I I , (2 t C)
-Own-er- (fee _simple)-
U_mK,�3 of ()wn(,r_,; (4 i:ecovd (A I I I cunt 1(ju()U'� t LeL3
-F,_qyMqRd_L.-& Laura _M_.__B�ar_ker_
_Gi_bson_S_mith__.__
TYj_X, ol or OIICLUIJ)IIAIIC('�� LAI IA-01)(�tty _;Llch
(_'Q)Ve1l,IIlt:,, , L_L(j1It'3 (A Wdy, L�L(
None -known
6) extenSion, or jiodifi�cation of itiunicipal facil�tic,S
.uch as :�.;anitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drdinjye, etc.
None r)roposed at this time.
7) DescriLx-- any previous actions taken by the Zoning Doard of AdjusUient or
1)y the South Burlington Planning Comuission which Afect the proposed sul--�-
division, and include the dates oC such actions:
X
H) �,-AIIAIIIL IOUI: ()f a sket-ch plan showing HIO 1-011OW111(j. 1111:01111ation:
I Nam-, of- uwners of- record Of C(Alti(JUOU-'; JTOJX21-LIA-,��.
IJOLIIOLI]Lie�'S and IIIU�A Of: (�I) JII (I)I-It1C)LIOLL; 1-and belonq-iny to owiier (it
1:ecord lind (h) L;LIbA1-V-P;1(-AI.
Exl�;Lirlq and plopc)!�,ed -Layout of LLnC`.;; t-yl)(-' I-Alld location Of
(--XI.'A-,i111j LIVId jT(qxxxq1 rLnAriCAICHIS 011 MU1, WICII I'; alld COVe-
11,111t ��;.
1) VYYU 01 , WALWH, and LIPPIoXinIaLe SIM, A LAI-13t in() ind JAOIX-)1�ed
ULI 11 t1(2S1, L110 op(-'11 !31)ace.
5) Date, ttue north arrow and ncaLu (HLWUI IQIJ WO UlaJAIC) .
G) lix-"It--ion JiLtp, showing relation Of PIC1XV00 WOLVI-ni.011 to MijaWnt PrUPVrtY
,111d SUrC0UIId1I1(J LiCk?(-I.
I CLML "I (--C;nL,iC1- poi -,,on
III C
W Ire) LIpL)
4r,", I I
a
August 10,, 1967
Mr. Dani,
Dav i a Ca
615 Ai rp
South Bu
Dear Mr.
This is
Board of
Town Off
Vermont
consider
Please p
HL/h
��// -/)' L- 2
/'k/
___-----
' L
-___-
c
'�
c1l,
-'
__--
Jk
'~
- ----'-` -�------_
\
�
J`\
f P
37�-
--__' -- -
--_-'-�-'--
_-----
!
-_--- -
\, 9
. f `
�V \
'\
EXISANG S CjURES
tb REMAIN � \
x •6v
qr per.
223 N/F SZAWJA
203/6 �ti�� PROPOSED LOT 223 `_ y
221 \ 12, 000 sq. ft.
0.27 acres / °
NEW LOT
j A6� hp >
OWNERSHIP \
UNDETERMINED\
PROPOSED LA YO UT \ / • \
NIS "- \
IPROPOSED L 0 T 221
\� 126000 sq. ft.
2 % acres
\• EXISTING PERIMETER PROPERTY • /'� �ZAp\�'
}k= EXISTING LOT ft. \� LINE TO Bi- DISSOLVED
29 403 sq. ft. ,
J 6.67 acres \iz4
o N F ADAMS
O 291/117
N/F
CRAM
223 •� \
i 221
EXISTING LAYOUT -_
-- N7 -
If
,y5 � / � • �(v �S 46�F
N I� %•� Tp Fes\
=I PROPOSED NEW t EWLOT
9984
EXISTING [OT 221 � �F�To�cRFrF
8 acres
24,581 s.�. ft. N/F BARKER
RKER
0.,56 acres 96 13
N/F ADAMS
3
i
2171109 0�
Cb ^p
IVlb
N h
o
i
° — S 82 42 29"
E-
a
92.51' �_
•
1
Afts•.
_ B0 am, /
M
— ---
1308701
•
`•
--
A _D
NO
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
74 37- E
119.95 TO .5U
ND CONCRETE
NUMENT
�__sl1E `
TH sroN
LIN TON —
`s
1
LOCUS _
RTS
NO ---TES _ — ----_-------___ --___ - _- --
1. REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE WARRANTY DEED OF GIBSON W. SMITH TO PAUL
G. ADAMS, DATED 24 JULY 1986, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 217 ON PAGES
109-110, OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS
2. REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE WARRANTY DEED OF DALTON L. VILLENEUVE
AND JOY A. VILLENEUVE, DATED 1 MARCH 1990 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME
291 ON PAGES 117-118 OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS.
3 REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE PLAN 'PREPARED BY ENGINEERS INCORPORATED
OF VE-RMONT EN77TLEO "BOUNDARYPLAN DAVIS CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT" DATED JUNE 1970, LATEST
REVISION DATED 6 JULY 1970 AS RECORDED IN MAP VOLUME 80 ON PAGE
154 OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS.
4. THE PERIMETER PROPERTY LINES HAVE BEEN CALCULATED FROM
INFORMAAON OBTAINED BY FIELD SURVEYS PERFORMED BY THIS OFFICE
AND ARE BASED ON THE REFERENCES GIVEN IN NOTES 1-3 AND
MONUMENTATION FOUND ON THE SITE. THE DISTANCES SHOWN APPROXIMATE
THE DISTANCES AS GIVEN IN SAID REFERENCES, HOWEVER, THERE ARE
MANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE ANGLES GIVEN IN THE REFERENCES AND
THE THOSE FOUND 1N THE FIELD.
5. THIS PROPERTY, AS DESCRIBED IN THE NOTES 1-3 REFERENCES AND SHOWN
HEREON, IS SUBJECT TO ANY MODIFICATIONS, ENCUMBRANCES, OR
EASEMENTS THAT AN UPDATED BOUNDARY SURVEY INCLUDING DETAILED
TITLE RESEARCH, WOULD REVEAL. .
LEGEND
� m m � PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE
-•-
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LOT LINE
- -
EXISTING PERIMETER PROPERTY
LINE TO BE DISSOLVED
--- ----
— R.O.W./EASEMENT LINE
°
IRON PIN/PIPE FOUND
•
CALCULATED INTERSECTION
•
IRON PIN TO BE SET
o
CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
GRAPHIC SCALE
-- ( IN ►TT) ----
1 Inch - 20 M
221/22,� AIRPORT PARKWA Y
_ _SWTd
RETRACEM.�CNT SURVEY
S UBDI VISION PLAN
90080
L��LSIJL=.1�1111����
LE (�tl W /] E uv m
INCORPORATEO
_JULY 1990 _
__ _ _ FLI •r
wancllunc ,,"o "�,,n"wc scnNus
0 3583
WILLISTON VERMONT
0.
L7R-,9 Y ROAD
X
�'
PROPOSED LA YO UT
o • ��� PROPOSED L O T 221
1]\ / � •�
12 000 sq. ft. �°` /
6.27 acres
/� � EXISTING PERIMETER PROPERTY
I� EXISTI LOT 223`'
Zt 29 40 ft. \ \ LINE TO BE DISSOLVED
v 6.67 ac\ \ t \ A/
�
,,
O 6 s
N/F ADAMS
j ��,�' �0i \ �
\� ,�
�O 219/117 �\ �'��- \.3'
•, ,�4j w"TES / + • _ �C� \ �,\ \� , '96
� � -- = _�..► • .. SEA, \` \ \ \\ •ry
PROPOSED NEW LOT
sq. ft. EXISTING LOT
I
68 `acres 24,581 sq. ft. N/F BARKET�
10.56 acres 96113
N/F ADAMS
_ \ -92
00,
_ Y 11g 9S, E
Tn—
No Text