HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-08-34 - Decision - 1580R Dorset Street#SD-08-34
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DORSET STREET ASSOCIATES - CIDER MILL II
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-08-34
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
Dorset Street Associates, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking final plat
approval to amend a planned unit development consisting of 149 residential units. The
amendment consists of: 1) adding 30 acres to the project area, 2) constructing 79 single
family dwellings, and 3) constructing 30 multi -family dwelling units, 1530 Dorset Street.
The Development Review Board held public hearings on July 15, 2008, November 4,
2008 and November 18, 2008. Lance Llewellyn represented the applicant.
Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and
supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development
Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The applicant is seeking final plat approval to amend a planned unit development
consisting of 149 residential units. The amendment consists of: 1) adding 30
acres to the project area, 2) constructing 79 single family dwellings, and 3)
constructing 30 multi -family dwelling units, 1530 Dorset Street,
2. The application was reviewed on July 15, 2008 but continued at the request of
the Board so as to allow for a technical review of the traffic impacts. The
application has since been continued several times so that Staff and the
applicant could continue to review traffic implications.
3. The owner of record of the subject property is Dorset Street Associates, LLC &
G.A. Associates, LLC.
4. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant Natural Resources
Protection Zoning District (SEQ-NRP), the Southeast Quadrant Neighborhood
Residential Zoning District (SEQ-NR), and the Southeast Quadrant Village
Residential Zoning District (SEQ-VR).
5. The plans submitted consist of a 37 page set of plans, page two (2) entitled, "The
Cider Mill Cider Mill Phase II Existing Features South Burlington Vermont",
prepared by Llewellyn -Howley, Inc., dated 3/1/07, last revised 2/29/08.
- 1 -
#SD-08-34
The total acreage of the Cider Mill Development, including the amendment, is 154 acres.
The density of right, generated by the land, at 1.2 units per acre, allows for 185 units.
The maximum units allowed, per the South Burlington Land Development Regulations
and in accordance with Chapter 9, the Southeast Quadrant, and determined by the
various sub -districts included in the very large parcel, is 568 units.
The applicant is proposing a total of 326 units (68 of these are for future development, to
be phased in at a later date). Therefore, a total of 141 development rights shall be
needed.
The applicant has stated that they have a legal option to purchase enough development
rights to build the project as proposed and has submitted the legal documents pertaining
to the options for review by the City Attorney as part of Master Plan approval. The
development rights should be purchased by the applicant prior to issuance of zoning
permits for any units beyond the 185 allowed by the property's inherent density.
149 units have been previously approved as part of the prior subdivision and the
applicant has thus far been issued zoning permits for 43 of these units.
SUBDIVISION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations,
subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions:
The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development
patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the
zoning district(s) in which it is located.
The standards for this criterion are found below in a review of the regulations of the
Southeast Quadrant.
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan
for the affected district(s).
The proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington
Comprehensive Plan.
Southeast Quadrant District
This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district. Therefore it is
subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR.
9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts
The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the
entire Southeast Quadrant Zoning District.
A. Height.
-2-
#SD-08-34
(1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or
SEQ-NR sub -district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions
of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts.
(2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC
sub -district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section
3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts.
The applicant has stated that the heights of buildings will remain below the height
limitations of the sub -district.
B. Open Space and Resource Protection.
(1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize
opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining
parcels
The layout of the proposed subdivision provides for two substantially sized parks and
another smaller one. These are acceptable. The more northern park is largely a wetland
and will serve as mostly open space and include a stormwater pond. The more southern
park is on dry soils and will be easily accessible to the 100+ homes in the vicinity. The park
is easily accessed via walkways across the lots.
(2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner
consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable sub -district allowing
carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw.
The streets and building lots are consistent with the regulating plan. The street, block and
lot pattern provides pedestrian -scaled development and the street patterns allow for direct
walking and bicycling trips. The street design also promotes slower speeds and
connections between neighborhoods. The proposed parks are easily accessible for all
residents of the proposed development.
(3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing
management shall be established by the applicant.
The applicant has provided language which provides for ongoing maintenance of the park
areas.
Furthermore, this language also includes provisions for protection of the wetland and
associated buffers.
(4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction
and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy
or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In
making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the
project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the
Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation.
The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section
16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan
shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land
-3-
#SD-08-34
Development Regulations
The applicant has submitted a grading and erosion control plan as part of the phasing plan.
The Board finds it appropriate at this time.
(5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect
wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner
that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link
fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the
use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged.
The wetlands located within the park land have been delineated with a landscape buffer or
split rail fencing. They should be kept as natural as possible, and be brush -hogged several
times per year rather than mowed.
C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is
encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses
(including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of
agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations
and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for
agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -
supported agriculture.
This criterion is not applicable to this application.
D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the
Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is
approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and
utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on
the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land,
schools, and sewer and water facilities.
(1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to
meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City
requirements, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation,
and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of
Environmental Conservation.
The City of South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans and provided
comments in a memo dated July 16, 2008.
(2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines,
and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of
such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties.
Access is proposed via a street connection to the existing Cider Mill development.
Access is also shown to the east to Hinesburg Road via a 24 foot wide road located in
an existing 75 foot Right -of -Way. The applicant has submitted details of the roadway.
The Department of Public Works reviewed the preliminary plans in a memo dated
September 18, 2008.
#S D-08-34
The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memo dated July
3, 2008. The plans should be revised in accordance with these comments.
Future street access is also shown to the south and north side of the lot for potential
connections to future developments.
(3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a
manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards,
absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has
been approved by the City Council.
The Recreation Path Committee discussed the plans with the applicant at a meeting on
September 8, 2008. At issue is a concern for an easement to the Scott property. A
pedestrian path easement to the "Scott' property, now owned by the City, is shown on the
plans.
(4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that
adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation
including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width,
vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water
flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants.
The City of South Burlington Fire Department has reviewed the plans and issue comments
in a memo dated September 11, 2008. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the
Fire Chief. There is no need for revisions to the plans.
E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management
strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on adjacent roads and sufficient to
create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and
emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the
Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the
applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants.
Access is proposed via a street connection to the existing Cider Mill development.
Access is also shown to the east to Hinesburg Road via a 24 foot wide road located in
an existing 75 foot Right -of -Way.
(1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of
such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties.
The plans include rights -of -way and provisions for access to the properties to the north
and the south of the new portion of the development as well as a 50 foot wide road
access easement from Sommerfield Drive (in Cider Mill 1) to the Jewett property to the
south.
(2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway
plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant
related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council.
The neighborhood roads are proposed to be 26 feet wide with parking on one side, 24 feet
wide in areas with no on -street parking. The road widths are proposed to be narrowed to 18
-5-
#SD-08-34
feet with no parking at the wetland crossings. This meets the standards set forth in Table 9-
2, Street Design Criteria for Local Streets in the SEQ-NR zoning district. All roads are set
within 50 foot right-of-ways with the exception of that which is labeled as "Aurora Road" on
the plans, which is proposed to be 60 feet wide.
(3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent
streets and neighborhoods shall apply.
9.08 SEQ-NR &NRT Sub -District; Specific Standards
The SEQ-NRT sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as
enumerated in this Section.
A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern
(1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300
and 400 linear feet; see Figure 9-2 for example. If longer block lengths are
unavoidable blocks 400 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or
recreation path connections.
This criterion is being met in this application. The development blocks are broken by the
two proposed parks and are appropriate in length.
(2) Interconnection of Streets. Average spacing between intersections shall be 300
to 500 feet. Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are discouraged. Dead end streets
may not exceed 200 feet in length. Street stubs are required at the end of dead end
streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian
connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section
15.12(D)(4).
All streets loop into others; connectivity in the proposed development is ideal.
(3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to
the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of
these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets
is strongly encouraged.
This matter has already been commented on. The plans depict numerous connection
opportunities at various parcels to the north and south.
(4) Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of
1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended.
Lot ratios are appropriate.
B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards
(1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and
local) in the NR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that
discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists.
#SD-08-34
Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-1
and 9-2, and Figures 9-4 and 9-5 of the SBLDR.
The roadway, sidewalk, and recreation path design have already been commented on.
(2) Sidewalks. Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an
additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk
from the street. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street, and must be
connected in a pattern that promotes walkability throughout the development. The
DRB may in its discretion require supplemental sidewalk segments to achieve this
purpose.
This criterion is being met.
(3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3)
Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet
wide. Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory
to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size
of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on
center.
At this point, the applicant is proposing street trees in accordance with the regulations
along both sides of every street except for Aurora Road where there are no street trees
to the north. The Board agrees that it is presumptuous to put the trees in advance of
development and risk damaging them with construction, but would like to ensure that the
trees are planted should the development never occur. The Board will require a phasing
plan, which would require street trees to be planted in five years, or otherwise re-
considered for an extension by the Development Review Board.
The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memo dated
July 2, 2008. There are minor changes needed to the plans.
The applicant has noted in a planting specification that no street trees will be planted
until construction is complete. The Board finds this comment too vague. The Board will
require that street trees be delayed until road construction is complete, but must be in
place prior to adding the final layer of top -coat.
(4) On -street parking; see Section 9.08(B)(4).
This issue has already been commented on.
(5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian
crossing distances and to slow traffic; see Figure 9-6 and Section 9.08(B)(5).
The City Engineer and Director of Public has commented on this issue.
(6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14')
shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from
public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower-
7-
#SD-08-34
intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother
levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest
level consistent with public safety.
The applicant has submitted sufficient lighting details.
C. Residential Design
(1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street.
Primary entries for single family and multi -family buildings must face the street.
Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special
design guidelines apply to arterial streets).
(2) Building Fagades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and
variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified,
but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony.
Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are
oriented to the street are encouraged.
The applicant is requesting to address the Residential Design, pursuant to Section
9.08(C) of the Regulations, including building orientation, building facades and front
building setbacks, placement of garages and parking, and mix of housing types until a
later date.
(3) Front Building Setbacks. In pedestrian districts, a close relationship between
the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment.
Buildings should be set back twenty-five feet (25') from the back of sidewalk.
As no building envelopes, footprints, or elevations have been submitted, staff cannot
determine if this criterion is being met.
(4) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front
setbacks. Porch, stoop and balcony areas within the front setback shall not be
enclosed or weatherized with glazing or other solid materials.
(5) Placement of Garages and Parking. See Section 9.08(C)(4) and Figure 9-7. The
front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the
house by a minimum of eight feet.
Compliance with this criterion cannot be determined until road right-of-way lines and
building elevations are submitted. The applicant has stated that they will be seeking a
waiver from this requirement; permission is requested to allow the garage setback from
the face of the building to be 3 feet rather than 8. Permission is also requested to allow
the garage to be set back form the front of the porch to be 8 feet, rather than from the
front of the building.
The applicant is requesting to address the Residential Design criteria at a later date.
#S D-08-34
(6) Mix of Housing Types. A mix of housing types is encouraged within neighborhoods
and developments. Housing types should be mixed within blocks, along the street and
within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of identical housing
types.
The applicant is proposing 66 single family homes, 13 carriage homes (single family
detached condos), and 30 townhouses (multi -family).
This is sufficient to meet this criterion.
This proposed subdivision is located in the southeast quadrant district. Therefore it is
subject to the provisions of Section 15.18(B).
The proposed subdivision is in compliance with all provisions of this section.
Traffic
The major issue with regards to traffic impact involves the question of what is the
applicant's responsibility towards the cost of improving the VT 116/Cheesefactory Road
intersection? This issue was raised in the applicant's Traffic Impact Study under
Conclusions and Recommendations.
The City's traffic consultants, Georges Jacquemart of Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart,
Inc., reviewed the Traffic Impact Study and responded in a report dated August 4, 2008.
The applicant's traffic consultant, Abby Lisius of Trudell Consulting Engineers responded
to Mr. Jacquemart's memo with a memo to him dated 9/25/08. Mr. Jacquemart then
responded to her comments in a memo dated October 14, 2008.
In his latest memo, Mr. Jacquemart proposes to "calculate the respective shares of
improvement responsibility based on the level of service D threshold and using the
existing and future delay condition during the AM peak hour as a measurement". He
concludes, based on his "analysis taking into consideration all traffic volumes above the
acceptable LOS D limit, the Cider Mill Phase II project would be responsible for 35.6% of
the improvement costs...".
Staff contacted Mr. Jacquemart by e-mail on 10/27/08 to inquire as to how many
dwelling units the developer could build before triggering the need for the intersection
improvement. His answer was 23.1 % of the planned units. This represents 25 dwelling
units.
The applicant shall be subject to the following two (2) conditions which address
the issues discussed above:
Prior to issuance of a Zoning Permit for the construction of the 26th dwelling unit
of Cider Mill II, the City shall assess the developer (Dorset Street Associates,
LLC and GA Associates, LLC), at a maximum, 35.6% of the City of South
Burlington's cost of improvements to the Vermont Route 116/Cheesefactory
Road intersection. The cost of said improvements are to be determined by the
developer after consultation with the Vermont Agency of Transportation and the
City of South Burlington Public Works Department. The percentage of actual
M
#SD-08-34
costs paid shall be adjusted by a percentage, to be determined by the impacts of
subsequent developments affecting this intersection upon application to the
Development Review Board as an amendment to this approval.
The Developer shall conduct turning movement counts at the Vermont Route
116/Nadeaucrest Street intersection prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for
the 50th and 100th dwelling unit in Cider Mill Il, to determine if a northbound left
turn lane is warranted. The warrant analysis shall be provided to Staff for review.
Turn lane shall be constructed by the developer when the warrant is met and
completed within six (6) months of the determination that the improvement is
warranted.
DECISION
Motion by Roger Farley, seconded by Peter Plumeau, to approve Final Plat Application
#SD-08-34 of Dorset Street Associates, subject to the following conditions:
All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as
amended herein.
2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plat submitted by the applicant,
and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning.
3. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below prior to final plat submittal:
a. The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the South
Burlington Water Department as outlined in a memo dated July 16, 2008.
b. The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the City Engineer
as outlined in a memo dated July 3, 2008.
c. The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the Public Works
Department dated August 2, August 3, and August 31, 2007.
d. The subdivision plat sheets shall be revised to note "final" subdivision plat
and shall include the seal and signature of the land surveyor.
e. The plans shall be revised to include 911 street addresses
f. The subdivision plats shall be revised to show the 50 foot wide road
easement to the Jewett property to the south and the 10' and 20'
pedestrian path easements from Sommerfield Drive to the Auclair
property to the south.
4. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the South Burlington Water
Department as outlined in a memo dated July 16, 2008.
-10-
#SD-08-34
5. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the Director of Public Works as
outlined in a memo dated September 18, 2008.
6. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the City Engineer as outlined in a
memo dated July 3, 2008.
7. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the South Burlington Fire Chief as
outlined in a letter dated September 11, 2008.
8. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the City Arborist as outlined in a
memo dated July 2, 2008.
9. The applicant shall submit legal documents to be recorded in the land records
showing clear ownership of the remaining 141 development rights to the City
Attorney for approval, prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the 1861" unit.
10. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new
utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground.
11. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in
Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition,
the grading plan should meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South
Burlington Land Development Regulations.
12. The applicant and/or Homeowner's Association shall provide for ongoing
maintenance (i.e. mowing) for the areas designated as "neighborhood park lands".
13. The wetlands and associated buffers in the open space areas shall be kept in as
natural a state as possible and shall be brush -hogged several times per year, but
never mowed.
14. Pursuant to Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the Board
approves wetland & wetland encroachments as depicted on the approved plan.
15. There shall be no use of pesticides or non -organic fertilizers within the wetlands
or associated 50 foot buffers.
16. The applicant shall receive final wastewater allocation from the Director of Planning
and Zoning prior to issuance of any zoning permits.
17. The applicant shall post a $253,650 landscaping bond for the street trees prior to
issuance of the zoning permit for road construction. The applicant shall also post a
$27,045 landscape bond for the project site landscaping prior to issuance of the first
residential zoning permit. These bonds shall remain in full effect for three (3) years
from planting to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance
of survival.
18. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for the first building or start of utility or
road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g.
irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for proposed public road, and
- 11 -
#SD-08-34
utility, sewer, water, pedestrian path, etc) shall be submitted to the City Attorney
for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records.
19. Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition # 18
above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said
improvements.
20. In accordance with Section 15.14 of the South Burlington Land Development
Regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g. roads,
water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to
the City Engineer, "as -built" construction drawings certified by a licensed
engineer.
21. This approval does not include site plan approval for the multi -family dwellings
shown on the plans.
22. No zoning permits can be issued in the development for any residential unit until
such time as the Development Review Board has approved the Residential
Design pursuant to Section 9.08(C) of the Land Development Regulations.
23. Street trees shall be planted along the northern side of "Aurora Road" at a date
no later than five years from the recording of the mylar for this subdivision. At
such a time, any proposals to delay the plantings further must be approved by
the Development Review Board on a yearly basis.
24. Street trees must be in place on each street or road prior to adding the final layer
of the pavement
25. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Permit for the construction of the 26th dwelling unit
of Cider Mill II, the City shall assess the developer (Dorset Street Associates,
LLC and GA Associates, LLC), at a maximum, 35.6% of the City of South
Burlington's cost of improvements to the Vermont Route 116/Cheesefactory
Road intersection. The cost of said improvements are to be determined by the
developer after consultation with the Vermont Agency of Transportation and the
City of South Burlington Public Works Department. The percentage of actual
costs paid shall be adjusted by a percentage, to be determined by the impacts of
subsequent developments affecting this intersection upon application to the
Development Review Board as an amendment to this approval.
26. The Developer shall conduct turning movement counts at the Vermont Route
116/Nadeaucrest Street intersection prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for
the 50th and 100th dwelling unit in Cider Mill II, to determine if a northbound left
turn lane is warranted. The warrant analysis shall be provided to Staff for review.
Turn lane shall be constructed by the developer when the warrant is met and
completed within six (6) months of the determination that the improvement is
warranted.
27. Any changes to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington
Development Review Board.
28. The mylar shall be recorded prior to any zoning permit issuance.
-12-
#SD-08-34
29. The final plat plan (survey plat sheets 1 & 2) shall be recorded in the land records
within 180 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the
Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the
applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the
digital information shall require approval of the South Burlington GIS Coordinator.
Mark Behr — ea nay/abstain/not present
Matthew Birmingham — yea/nay/abstain of present
John Dinklagete/nay/abstain/not
nay/abstain not present
Roger Farley ay/abstain/no present
Eric Knudsen present
Peter Plumeanay/abstain/not present
Gayle Quimby — yea/na abstain of present
Motion carried by a vote of I -
Signed this da of ' 01, �L.�' 2008 bY Y
i
Mark Behr, Vice Chairman
Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental
Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this
decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to
challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long.
You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy;
finality).
-13-