HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-08-31 - Decision - 1500 Dorset Street#S D-08-31
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
WILLIAM E. DAILEY, Jr. - 1500 DORSET STREET
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-08-31
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
William E. Dailey, Jr, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking final plat approval
to amend a previously approved five (5) lot subdivision. The amendment consists of: 1)
relocating the private road serving lots #2, 3 & 4, 2) replacing the Cedar trees along the
south side of the private road with Autumn Blaze Maple & split rail fencing, 1500 Dorset
Street.
The Development Review Board held a public hearing on Tuesday, July 1, 2008. Bob
Gallo represented the applicant.
Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and
supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development
Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The applicant is seeking final plat approval to amend a previously approved five
(5) lot subdivision. The amendment consists of: 1) relocating the private road
serving lots #2, 3 & 4, 2) replacing the Cedar trees along the south side of the
private road with Autumn Blaze Maple & split rail fencing, 1500 Dorset Street.
2. The owners of record of the subject property are: William E. Dailey III, Todd &
Maureen Wulfson, and Scott & Cheryl Braymann.
3. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant
4. The plans submitted consist of an eight (8) page set of plans, page one (1)
entitled, "Subdivision Plat Tax Map 67 Lot 1500 William Dailey, III 1500 Dorset
Street South Burlington, VT", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, dated
4/20/07, last revised on 5/19/08.
5. The Board has no issues with the proposed changes to the final plan. Staff
discussed the driveway relocation and related connection to Dorset Heights with
the Director of Public Works who also has no concerns.
6. The applicant has stated that the proposed realignment of the private roadway
will not create any additional square footage of impact to the wetlands on site.
7. The replacement of the cedar hedge with the maple trees and spilt rail fencing is
adequate and continues to meet the goals of the original request and approval: to
buffer the wetlands and wetland buffers from encroachment as useable lawn
areas.
- 1 -
#S D-08-31
DECISION
Motion by E �� �1�"�' seconded byIt to
approve Final Plat Application #SD-08-31 of William E. Dailey, Jr., subject to the
following conditions:
1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as
amended herein.
2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plat submitted by the applicant
and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning.
3. Any changes to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington
Department of Planning and Zoning.
4. The final plat (subdivision plat) shall be recorded in the land records within 180
days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board
Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the
applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the
digital information shall require approval of the South Burlington GIS Coordinator.
Mark Behr — yealnay/abstain/not present
Matthew Birming — e '/nay/abstain/not present
John Dinklage a /nay/abstain/not present
Roger Farley — y nay/abstain/not present
Eric Knudsen — ea ay/abstain/not prese
Peter Plumeau �y�enay/abstain/n-o-Fp—re§6-h
/nay/abstain not present
Gayle Quimby
Motion carried by a vote of (O - V- C>
Signed this -2 day of 2008, by
John Dinklage, Chair
Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental
Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRECP 5 in writing, within 30 days of the date this
decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to
challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long.
-2-
#SD-08-31
You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy;
finality).
-3-