Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-08-31 - Decision - 1500 Dorset Street#S D-08-31 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING WILLIAM E. DAILEY, Jr. - 1500 DORSET STREET FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-08-31 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION William E. Dailey, Jr, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking final plat approval to amend a previously approved five (5) lot subdivision. The amendment consists of: 1) relocating the private road serving lots #2, 3 & 4, 2) replacing the Cedar trees along the south side of the private road with Autumn Blaze Maple & split rail fencing, 1500 Dorset Street. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on Tuesday, July 1, 2008. Bob Gallo represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is seeking final plat approval to amend a previously approved five (5) lot subdivision. The amendment consists of: 1) relocating the private road serving lots #2, 3 & 4, 2) replacing the Cedar trees along the south side of the private road with Autumn Blaze Maple & split rail fencing, 1500 Dorset Street. 2. The owners of record of the subject property are: William E. Dailey III, Todd & Maureen Wulfson, and Scott & Cheryl Braymann. 3. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant 4. The plans submitted consist of an eight (8) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Subdivision Plat Tax Map 67 Lot 1500 William Dailey, III 1500 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, dated 4/20/07, last revised on 5/19/08. 5. The Board has no issues with the proposed changes to the final plan. Staff discussed the driveway relocation and related connection to Dorset Heights with the Director of Public Works who also has no concerns. 6. The applicant has stated that the proposed realignment of the private roadway will not create any additional square footage of impact to the wetlands on site. 7. The replacement of the cedar hedge with the maple trees and spilt rail fencing is adequate and continues to meet the goals of the original request and approval: to buffer the wetlands and wetland buffers from encroachment as useable lawn areas. - 1 - #S D-08-31 DECISION Motion by E �� �1�"�' seconded byIt to approve Final Plat Application #SD-08-31 of William E. Dailey, Jr., subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as amended herein. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plat submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. Any changes to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 4. The final plat (subdivision plat) shall be recorded in the land records within 180 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the South Burlington GIS Coordinator. Mark Behr — yealnay/abstain/not present Matthew Birming — e '/nay/abstain/not present John Dinklage a /nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley — y nay/abstain/not present Eric Knudsen — ea ay/abstain/not prese Peter Plumeau �y�enay/abstain/n-o-Fp—re§6-h /nay/abstain not present Gayle Quimby Motion carried by a vote of (O - V- C> Signed this -2 day of 2008, by John Dinklage, Chair Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRECP 5 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. -2- #SD-08-31 You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). -3-