Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIZ-12-08 - Supplemental - 0900 Dorset StreetJanuary 9, 2013 Re: #IZ-12-08, 900 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Olesky: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the City Council concerning your recent application. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, 6;,� X/_ Kimberly L. Vurray, AICP Development Coordinator City Manager's Office Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 4863 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4131 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council & City Manager FROM: Kimberly L. Murray, Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing- Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-08 (900 Dorset Street) DATE: December 3, 2012 City Council meeting Tonight's continued public hearing from November 5, 2012 is an application for a planned unit development to construct a three (3) unit multi -family dwelling on a lot with an existing single family dwelling at 900 Dorset Street located in the Residential 2 Zoning District. In response to the feedback received from the City Council via staff on October 24, 2012, the applicant has asked for additional time to prepare material for the Council's review. Tonight, the applicant is planning to provide additional testimony and materials to discuss with the City Council. These materials were not ready in time for the Council's packet. Jeff Olesky, Civil Engineer Associates, Inc. will be present for the applicant. p l ZIA 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4131 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Revised 412012 e;Es Interested Persons Record and Service List l ER M0NT n. Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Appropriate Municipal Panel (AMP) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The AMP must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the AMP must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the AMP. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the AMP must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). _ HEARING DATE: �-�pl icy-�7'ors PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY/ NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST C ffa/N-bEi- ch'.? nd�(u rn� �.�t- G,C' &c.0 �3 Is iu��jar,��`�r Pdi3kY45o Bor"(in Zf or U% a�' l7--/z -13 4 �zc-4t-tJ &j i49- l P lorku !rC � CO A b 'a eat U ~ a raifca4, as. Z5 � re 1 izz f Z - rZ -®-7 Sertecc,lL�'©��eJu VT.Ge:f 3r Gc7i2?,14�ree cepG p1e, nIes— ICE.jCcea,-v+.cc,,�. ,o �� s r<<I ��,., r✓�. ay,,Y south; _ Interested Persons Record and Service List Revised 412012 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Appropriate Municipal Panel (AMP) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The AMP must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the AMP must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the AMP. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the AMP must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: S-"ZO, D-c`,( PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST e-•LVU A'j' o V-"' G�� -w -r•. C011A 5CLAr+ Q-' t C.1-A f s - T ; J, .t c- c As Sox-, �f ��esky "! Jt?I�s L Cea-�[�•�ary, C',EA �v Mans�etd V�►cw Lam. P PA in �— .—`1 Revised 412012 Interested Persons Record and Service List V ER6ICNT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Appropriate Municipal Panel (AMP) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The AMP must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the AMP must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the AMP. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the AMP must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST lit - r I U \i.ew I-v� • � O� �CiY�>P'� S'j .. LLi.. t-l(kJ L) IV- & Vt n,Jr Cc.t h k tl CC.I cIO-VL � Revised 412012 Interested Persons Record and Service List � south} = U ....... .......... _...... F :.r.Mor;r Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Appropriate Municipal Panel (AMP) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The AMP must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the AMP must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the AMP. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the AMP must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. ,24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: UL � 1-Z PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST J �j�e51C jvlPsXy C�. Cec�-vi •co=r C=Y41 its. f�SSL�. ZyIt. i� Ma-�'.ftetA vVI LLC nncp rs�t IIQ� �+-�lT.Go at to mP-►��aE� �c.o tic ��-v,� LPj Ggj-Z p-AV5 Q ra c eau—qrG 9"0 , WSW \ir (-Gtit 8,11nIY-scow► 20l kv-p- L�ztu-O,,A - iJtW(& C1® . b\AkKr-�C/V� �� IV V Fz,/c /d � s A14tcox.rb ol (?o �✓-��t Sc�rtec �04��(co� ry i=c Lie it, YC 4 SS vG t Revised 412012 �G Interested Persons Record and Service List 6A7pi;T Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Appropriate Municipal Panel (AMP) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The AMP must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the AMP must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the AMP. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the AMP must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: inC— Ors (, zvL PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS `P P k i CA-- �-i a r+ S PROJECT OF INTEREST � G�htJcCrt � vt�u�t C y�a1.0 5. . ! (��61.5-�'t,(C�7� r�i,+�1! :� (, %� �c 0 I � , j4 b—P, Pt �� ���� �A��S�C'`Y����v -�t�Gh��c.�s,ew►t S�ct� L�.c i2, -_lZ- i f .Z -s., r3��.40 �r 2 I - C�"? C,i Vl k. rz:1j-,AsS Cc. -T-- jO ivlv,.�s: %eW V.ew �A. v 5+0 ,f> Z —SeAA564 L r' Se n e c L On'd a P alp southburfington V E R M 0 N T MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council & City Manager FROM: Kimberly L. Murray, Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing- Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-08 (900 Dorset Street) DATE: November 5, 2012 City Council meeting Tonight's continued public hearing from July 16, 2012, August 20, 2012, and October 1, 2012 is an application for a planned unit development to construct a three (3) unit multi -family dwelling on a lot with an existing single family dwelling at 900 Dorset Street located in the Residential 2 Zoning District. In response to the feedback received from the City Council via staff on October 24, 2012, the applicant has asked for additional time to prepare material for the Council's review and requests that the hearing be continued to the next available meeting. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4131 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council & City Manager FROM: Kimberly L. Murray, Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing- Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-08 (900 Dorset Street) DATE: October 1, 2012 City Council meeting Tonight's continued public hearing from July 16th and August 201h is an application for a planned unit development to construct a three (3) unit multi -family dwelling on a lot with an existing single family dwelling at 900 Dorset Street located in the Residential 2 Zoning District. The applicant did not provide additional material for the continued hearing in time for the packet preparation as requested by staff per Council's guidance after the August 20th hearing. Attached is the narrative and site plan the applicant submitted at the August 20th hearing for your information. Jeff Olesky of Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., representing the applicant, 900 Dorset Street LLC. is expected to be in attendance at the public hearing on Monday. b► t P ti - �,,� -/Y-r�_ sowCc 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4131 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com CIAL rI IGINEERII G ASSOCIr US.— I Ira 10 Mansfield View Lane Phone: 802-864-2323 South Burlington, VT 05403 Fax: 802-864-2271 i-Mail: mail@cea-vtxom August 20th, 2012 Paul Conner Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Supplemental Material Interim Zoning Conditional Use Application 900 Dorset St. LLC 900 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Paul, This letter and attached revised site plan serve as supplemental supporting material in conjunction with the previously submitted Interim Zoning Conditional Use application for the proposed planned residential development to be located at 900 Dorset St., in South Burlington, Vermont. The plan changes include the following: • Included an area of approximately 2,000 sf to be designated for a community garden to be located in the southwest corner of the property, viewable from Dorset St. and the South Burlington bike path. • Significantly reduced the size of the gravel parking area previously proposed to be located in the southeast corner of the property. Proposed vegetative screening has also been added to the west, south and east sides of this area, with final location, spacing and species to be coordinated with the City Arborist. • Included an extension of the existing hedgerow between Dorset Park and Dorset St. to extend to the existing vegetation in the northwest corner of the property. Again, the final location, spacing and species would be coordinated with the City Arborist. • Included a sidewalk extension to provide direct pedestrian access to the South Burlington bike path from the proposed development. • Included additional streetscape landscaping along the proposed relocated driveway. In addition to the proposed plan changes, we offer the following revised/supplemental testimony regarding the four main review criteria for the interim zoning process: • Form Based Code — In attempts to determine what type of form based code may ultimately become applicable to this property we investigated other previously implemented transition areas between urban city centers and rural/agricutltural areas, as we feel this property represents such an area. We also contacted and met with City staff in an attempt to better understand what future requirements may become necessary as form based code is implemented City wide. The subject parcel falls in a zone that is neither urban nor rural, and represents a transition area typically associated with moderate to high density residential use. These areas often are associated with community living and readily accessible vehicular and pedestrian access to major arterial connecting roads such as Dorset St. Given that the proposed townhouse represents a maximum density proposal based on the current City of South Burlington zoning regulations, is consistent with the aesthetics and character of the surrounding properties as is common with form based code and adequately addresses the common goals of form based code for transitions zones of this nature, we feel the proposed development would be a great example of implemented form based code in this area. Sustainable Agriculture — Since the last proposal a community garden, approximately 2,000 sf in size, has been added to the proposed site plan. The garden would be located in the southwest corner of the property with the intent for the garden to viewable from Dorset St. and the South Burlington bike path, as it would represent a nice complimentary aesthetic to the existing vegetation along this section of the bike path. The garden would initially be owned and maintained by the property owners association, although there has also been some preliminary conversations regarding its potential inclusion or connection, at least in some part, to the National Gardening Association property located nearby on Dorset St. • Conservation of Open Space — With the understanding the existing property is only approximately 2 acres in size, is abutted by the Dorset Park recreational property to the north, east and south and that the proposed development currently represents a maximum build out of the existing lot, the owners do not feel it is necessary to designate any specific amount of open space as part of this project. Affordable Housing — In addition to the plan changes and this narrative, also attached is a copy of the current affordable housing pricing limits as established by the Vermont Housing Finance Agency, per their website. Based on these guidelines, the owner is willing to guarantee, at a minimum, that one of the proposed units will meet the requirements for affordable housing, representing an affordable housing designation of 25% of the proposed units. It is also highly likely that all four proposed living spaces will meet the definition of affordable housing depending on final market value and definition of affordable housing as ultimately designated by the City Council subcommittee for affordable housing. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this supplemental material or revised plans, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, JeffreY01sky,.E. Cc: CEA File #12165 Gene Richards (via email) Jeff Olesk From: Gene Richards<generichards@generichards3.com> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:39 PM To: jolesky@cea-vt.com ru`! A �vebsI Subject: Re: 900 Dorset St. 7Fole rurchasce pricelimits The property's purchase price cannot exceed these limits: Area 1-unit property Addison County $247,000 Bennington County $252,500 Burlington Targeted Area — Census Tract 4* $287,000 Caledonia County $287,000 Chittenden County $287,000-- Essex County $287,000 Franklin County $287,000 Grand Isle County $287,000 Lamoille County $287,000 Orange County $287,000 Orleans County $287,000 Rutland County $287,000 Washington County $287,000 Windham County $287,000 Windsor County $256,300 On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:33 AM, Jeff Olesky wrote: f Hey Gene, Steve and I are in the process of setting up a meeting with Kimberley Murray (the City Council staff representative) in an effort to get a better handle on this. If you've dug up any information on affordable housing costs, please let me know. I've requested a meeting for Friday. Jeffrey Olesky, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 1 LEGEND 6tt e ervcweeR: •:-...... E%ISTINC CONTOUR /pI' A 6— PROPosEO caNrouR CIVIL ENGMEWNG ASSOCIATES ING - � APPRONk1AlE PROPERtt TINE � �ls rxe��mz KdfA'0 — —0E— OMJEHEAD ELECTRIC — —UE— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC — — T — TELEPHWE UNE — N —ST— STORMDRAMAGE UNE ® SEWER MANHOLE ® STORM MANHOLE HYDRANT ® sHur-GPF w P— p— H CATCH BASIN 0o UGHT POLE DECIDUOUS 1REE C0411-OUS TREE r w,-Y.�.w, EDGE or D,usH/—S ------ DRAINAGE sWAt£ ZONING REQUIREMENTS Zming Dialncr Raedenlwl 2 Ovedoy El.—. None Min. Lot Size 11.000 f/Rn t Max. Oenaliy 2 unto/acre Max. lift, Coverage (R): Max Loi Coverage (�: 20% 4D% Front Yortl Setback (ft): 30 Stle Yard Setback (ft): 10 Rear Yard Setback (ft): Max Bugdmg He'ghl Pi[ched 30 (R): 28 I Eelstiga Ermdsed 86,982 of 66,982 of 0.5 units/acre 2 units/eae 9 2S .3 143X 256R 43 43 10 10 .25 225 DESIGN FLOW CALCULATIONS Existing Water Demand e: Sewer Flow One 3 bedroom house O 210 gpd = 210 gpd Proposed Woler Demand 4 Sewer Flow - One 3 bedroom house O 210 gpd = 210 gpd Three 3 bedroom townhouse unite O 210 gpd/townhouse = 630 gpd T,t,I = 210 gpd + 530 gpd = 840 gpd i i _ 1 l / , ��. — ACUJSO JSO SAV 01IN8fl: 900 DORSET ST. LLC 900 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT 05403 Pfl0l8CT: PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT M00 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT 05403 'l' S60TA, BURLINGTON r av e LOCATION MAP _ a� F. • - e�z m mxv. avwws I Rt PROPOSED CONDITIONS SITE PLAN 1 I GRAPHIC SCALE won �m I 7 xrc nvxew� r - n MAY 8, 2012 �'+ 1"=30' C2.0 12165 Kimberly Murray From: Jeff Olesky <jolesky@cea-vt.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 1:32 PM To: Kimberly Murray Subject: RE: 900 Dorset St. Project Hey Kimberly, In an effort to provide some more detailed information on the proposed architectural design, the owner has asked I request a continuance for this project to the next available agenda. If you need a written request, please let me know. Jeffrey Olesky, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Ln. South Burlington, VT 05403 p: (802) 864-2323 ex. 319 f: (802) 864-2271 email: iolesky@cea-vt.com From: Kimberly Murray [mailto:kmurray@sburl.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 3:15 PM To: jolesky@cea-vt.com Cc: Gene Richards Subject: RE: 900 Dorset St. Project Hi Jeff, The Council deliberated Mon. night 10/22 and asked me to relay to you that the application is on the right track with the amendments you have made to the site plan addressing the IZ criteria. The guidance is related to form based code and they would like to see the units designed more aesthetically similar or in context to the existing farmhouse to blend in better with the house. They did not make any suggestions around the bike path/walk in front of the parcel. If there is a way to economically still make one of the units affordable, they would look favorably on that. If you would like to include anything in their packet for the 11/5 meeting, I'd need it by Tues. 10/30. If you need more time based on this information, let me know and you can ask for it to be continued. Thanks, Ki,W�ly From: Kimberly Murray Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 8:08 AM To: 'jolesky@cea-vt.com' Cc: Gene Richards Subject: RE: 900 Dorset St. Project Hi Jeff, I believe the Council is scheduling some deliberative time on 10/22, 1 will bring this up to them. Thanks, Kw�L�j From: Jeff Olesky [ma iIto: joleskyCcbcea-vt.com] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:07 AM To: Kimberly Murray Cc: Gene Richards Subject: 900 Dorset St. Project Hey Kim, Just checking in on this project and wondering if the City Council has had any additional deliberative sessions and/or provided any further comment on this project? At the last hearing I proposed a few questions to them and it would be helpful to have answers within a time frame that would allow us to address them properly prior to the next hearing. Thanks. Jeffrey Olesky, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Ln. South Burlington, VT 05403 p: (802) 864-2323 ex. 319 f: (802) 864-2271 email: jolesky@cea-vt.com 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 August 201h, 2012 Paul Conner Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Supplemental Material Interim Zoning Conditional Use Application 900 Dorset St. LLC 900 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Paul, Phone: 802-864-2323 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vtxom This letter and attached revised site plan serve as supplemental supporting material in conjunction with the previously submitted Interim Zoning Conditional Use application for the proposed planned residential development to be located at 900 Dorset St., in South Burlington, Vermont. The plan changes include the following: • Included an area of approximately 2,000 sf to be designated for a community garden to be located in the southwest corner of the property, viewable from Dorset St. and the South Burlington bike path. • Significantly reduced the size of the gravel parking area previously proposed to be located in the southeast corner of the property. Proposed vegetative screening has also been added to the west, south and east sides of this area, with final location, spacing and species to be coordinated with the City Arborist. • Included an extension of the existing hedgerow between Dorset Park and Dorset St. to extend to the existing vegetation in the northwest corner of the property. Again, the final location, spacing and species would be coordinated with the City Arborist. • Included a sidewalk extension to provide direct pedestrian access to the South Burlington bike path from the proposed development. • Included additional streetscape landscaping along the proposed relocated driveway. In addition to the proposed plan changes, we offer the following revised/supplemental testimony regarding the four main review criteria for the interim zoning process: • Form Based Code — In attempts to determine what type of form based code may ultimately become applicable to this property we investigated other previously implemented transition areas between urban city centers and rural/agricutltural areas, as we feel this property represents such an area. We also contacted and met with City staff in an attempt to better understand what future requirements may become necessary as form based code is implemented City wide. The subject parcel falls in a zone that is neither urban nor rural, and represents a transition area typically associated with moderate to high density residential use. These areas often are associated with community living and readily accessible vehicular and pedestrian access to major arterial connecting roads such as Dorset St. Given that the proposed townhouse represents a maximum density proposal based on the current City of South Burlington zoning regulations, is consistent with the aesthetics and character of the surrounding properties as is common with form based code and adequately addresses the common goals of form based code for transitions zones of this nature, we feel the proposed development would be a great example of implemented form based code in this area. Sustainable Agriculture — Since the last proposal a community garden, approximately 2,000 sf in size, has been added to the proposed site plan. The garden would be located in the southwest corner of the property with the intent for the garden to viewable from Dorset St. and the South Burlington bike path, as it would represent a nice complimentary aesthetic to the existing vegetation along this section of the bike path. The garden would initially be owned and maintained by the property owners association, although there has also been some preliminary conversations regarding its potential inclusion or connection, at least in some part, to the National Gardening Association property located nearby on Dorset St. • Conservation of Open Space — With the understanding the existing property is only approximately 2 acres in size, is abutted by the Dorset Park recreational property to the north, east and south and that the proposed development currently represents a maximum build out of the existing lot, the owners do not feel it is necessary to designate any specific amount of open space as part of this project. Affordable Housing — In addition to the plan changes and this narrative, also attached is a copy of the current affordable housing pricing limits as established by the Vermont Housing Finance Agency, per their website. Based on these guidelines, the owner is willing to guarantee, at a minimum, that one of the proposed units will meet the requirements for affordable housing, representing an affordable housing designation of 25% of the proposed units. It is also highly likely that all four proposed living spaces will meet the definition of affordable housing depending on final market value and definition of affordable housing as ultimately designated by the City Council subcommittee for affordable housing. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this supplemental material or revised plans, please feel free to contact me. Sincerel401sky, Jeffre P.E. Cc: CEA File #12165 Gene Richards (via email) southburlington PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council & City Manager FROM: Kimberly L. Murray, Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-08 (900 Dorset Street) DATE: July 16, 2012 City Council meeting Tonight's initial public hearing is an application for a planned unit development to construct a three (3) unit multi -family dwelling on a lot with an existing single family dwelling at 900 Dorset Street located in the Residential 2 Zoning District. The applicant has provided a narrative of how they believe they meet the Interim Zoning review criteria in accordance with the guidance prepared by the City Attorney. It is included with this memo, as well as the proposed and existing site plans. Jeff Olesky of Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., representing the applicant, 900 Dorset Street LLC. is expected to be in attendance at the public hearing on Monday. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com (AVIL E IGI! EEkllr A� ISJJCIAtUO, l� IC, 10 Mansfield View Lane Phone: 802-864-2323 South Burlington, VT 05403 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com July 3rd, 2012 Paul Conner Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Interim Zoning Conditional Use Application 900 Dorset St. LLC 900 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Paul, In conjunction with the recently revised Interim Zoning Development Review Process, this letter serves as a narrative to address the submission requirements of Interim Zoning Conditional Use applications for the proposed planned residential development to be located at 900 Dorset St., in South Burlington, VT. Specifically it explains why the proposed development will not result in an undue adverse effect on the six criteria listed in Section VI of the Interim Bylaw. Furthermore, it details how the proposed development will not be in conflict to any amendments to the Land Development Regulations that the City ultimately adopts that implement the five goals outlined in the Interim Zoning submission requirements. Interim Zoning Bylaw Review — Section VI (a) — The proposed development shall not result in an undue adverse effect on the capacity of the existing or planned community facilities, services or lands. This project involves the construction of a new three unit townhouse, with each unit having three bedrooms. The existing single family residential house, as well as the existing barn and accessory structures, are to remain. Each of the community provided facilities and services are listed below, along with a brief summary of the potential impact this project will have on them: • Schools & Education — The proposed development could potentially add a small number of students to the South Burlington school system as the project is adding three potential single family dwelling units, but should not generate enough additional students to cause significant adverse effect on the school system. • Highway Capacity & Maintenance — The project proposes to relocate the existing curb cut along Dorset St. to a location that will serve both the existing structures and the proposed townhouse. The proposed curb cut is in a location that will provide adequate site distances for safe ingress and egress from Dorset St., as well as provide additional separation from the junction of Dorset St. with the existing community bike path. The current curb cut creates an unsafe intersection between the driveway, Dorset St. and the bike path, as vehicles entering the property off Dorset St. from the south have very little time to see bikes and pedestrian on the bike path heading north. This relocation of the curb cut should create a much safer intersection. The proposed development will add a few trips ends to the Dorset St. traffic, but should not have a large of enough impact to cause significant adverse effect to the surrounding roadway system. • City Hall & Services — The proposed development should not have an impact to the demands on City Hall or its related services. • Fire/EMS Facilities & Services — The proposed development should have a minimal impact on the demands of the City Fire and EMS services as the proposed development is only adding three additional residential units. • Police Facilities & Services — The proposed development should have a minimal impact on the police facilities and services as the proposed development is only adding three additional residential units. • Water & Sewer Facilities — The project would most likely utilize municipal water and sewer services to service the proposed three unit townhouse, which would require a theoretical amount of 630 gpd of water demand and sewer flow. • Stormwater Facilities — As the amount of impervious area associated with this project is less than an acre, no State Stormwater operational permit would be required. The site layout and grading would be designed to utilize existing drainage infrastructure and minimize stormwater runoff to the right-of-way. Based on the proposed layout and potential amount of disturbance during construction a State Stormwater Construction permit would be required. • Library Facilities & Services — The proposed development should not have a significant impact to the demands on the library or its related services as the proposed development is only adding three additional residential units. • Recreational Facilities & Services — The proposed development should not have a significant impact to the demands of the City's recreational facilities or services as the proposed development is only adding three additional residential units. • Housing & Affordable Housing — This property is currently utilized and zoned as a Residential 2 lot. The proposed project would meet all zoning related requirements for this zoning district including setbacks, density requirements and coverage requirements. • Community Lands — There are four primary items to address with regards to community lands: o Open Space — As the existing property is only approximately 2.0 acres in size, and is a relatively open site, there is no planned designated open space associated with this application. o Prime Agricultural Soils — Based on the web soil survey, this property is considered agricultural farmland of statewide importance. However, given the small size of the property and it's contiguity to developed properties, utilizing the property for agricultural purposes does not seem practical. o Form Based Codes — As this property does not lie within the Williston Road/Dorset Street/City Center areas, no form based codes are under consideration for this parcel o Travel Corridors - The property is located on Dorset St. approximately 2000' south of the Kennedy Dr. intersection. Section VI (b) — The proposed development shall not result in an undue adverse effect on the existing patterns and uses of development in the area. This lot is located on Dorset Street about 2000 ft south of the Dorset St./Kennedy Dr. intersection. It is located within the Residential 2 zoning district and does not appear to be subject to any additional overlay districts. Adjacent land uses are generally consistent with the proposed project. The north, east and south property boundaries are surrounded by the City of South Burlington's Dorset St. Park recreational facility. Slightly further north is a residential lot. To the west, on the opposite side of Dorset St., is the Faith United Methodist Church. However, on both the north and south sides of the church are planned residential developments that both utilize townhouse style structures. One is the Indian Creek development to the south, which features predominantly 4 unit townhouses. The second, to the north, is the more recently constructed Heatherfield development, which also features 4 unit townhouses. Both of these developments have a significantly higher amount of units. The proposed townhouse is intended to have a very similar look, in both size and aesthetics, to the Heatherfields development. This project is only seeking approval for a single structure, three unit, townhouse, that is consistent with both the neighboring community and the zoning regulations. Section VI (c) — The proposed development shall not result in an undue adverse effect on traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. As outlined in Seciton VI (a), Highway Capacity & Maintenance, the project proposes to relocate the existing curb cut along Dorset St. to a location that will serve both the existing structures and the proposed townhouse. The proposed curb cut is in a location that will provide adequate site distances for safe ingress and egress from Dorset St., as well as provide additional separation from the junction of Dorset St. with the existing community bike path which should create a much safer intersection between the access to this property, Dorset St. and the bike path. The proposed development will add a few trips ends to the Dorset St. traffic, but should not have a large of enough impact to cause significant adverse effect to the surrounding roadway system. Section VI (d) — The proposed development shall not result in an undue adverse effect on environmental limitations of the site or area and significant natural resource areas and sites. The property is a relatively small (+/- 2.0 acres) lot located within a residentially developed area of South Burlington. The site does not appear to contain any water courses, wetlands, wildlife corridors, rare vegetation or other viable environmental limitations or natural resources. Section VI (e) — The proposed development shall not result in an undue adverse effect on utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposed development does not include any type of renewable energy production on site. As the proposed building is a standard sized structure and located within the theoretical building envelope, it does not preclude, or have an adverse effect on, the ability of adjacent properties to use renewable energy. Section VI (f) — The proposed development shall not result in an undue adverse effect on municipal plans and other municipal bylaws, ordinances or regulations in effect. The City of South Burlington's Comprehensive Plan goals were most recently adopted on March 9, 2011. Within this comprehensive plan are several goals related to the well being of the City, region, environment and community. Each of the general plan goals are listed below, along with a brief summary of the potential impact this project will have on them: • Regional Cooperation — The proposed development is located within a suburban area and is consistent with the community development. The proposed development does not alter this position and the project will not inhibit any regional plan coordination. • City Identity & City Center — The proposed development is not within the designated City Center area. • Population & Balanced Rate of Growth — The proposed development has the potential to add approximately 12 residents to the population, which represents a minimal increase to the population growth of the community. • Quality Environment — There are no water courses, wetlands, wildlife corridors, rare vegetation or other viable potential natural resources to be impacted by this project. • Land Use Distribution — The property is located within the Residential 2 zoning district, which is encouraged to promote moderate density residential use. The proposed development meets the definition of moderate density and is consistent with the zoning districts density requirements. • Open Space Planning — The property is a relatively small (+/- 2.0 acres) lot with existing developed areas. The proposed development is located within the theoretical building envelope. The site does not contain any existing open spaces and there are no designated open spaces adjacent to the project that will be impacted. • Housing — The property is located within the Residential 2 zoning district, which is encouraged to promote moderate density residential use. The proposed development proposes a two level, three unit townhouse structure that is consistent with both the existing structures and surrounding community. The proposed townhouse is intended to have a very similar look, in both size and aesthetics, to the Heatherfields development. • Schools — The proposed development has the potential to add approximately 6 students to the population, which represents a minimal affect on the public school system or educational programs. • Recreation — The proposed development does not include any specific recreational facilities. However, the proposed project will provide additional separation from the junction of Dorset St. with the existing community bike path • Economic Development — The proposed development represents a minimal expansion. The project will not have a significant impact to the economic development of the area. • Transportation — The proposed development will add a few trips ends to the Dorset St. traffic, but should not have a large of enough impact to cause significant adverse effect to the surrounding roadway system. • Public Utilities & Services — Given the small scale of the proposed development, there should not be a significant adverse effect to the public utilities and service. Requests for additional water and sewer allocation would be requested prior to further permitting. • Land Use Through Zoning — The existing property is located within the Residential 2 zoning district, with no applicable overlay districts. The proposed development represents an approved use for this property and is consistent with the other properties in this area. City Goal Review — • Form Based Code — Although there is not a clear understanding of the potential form based code that would considered for this area, the proposed project is removed far enough away from urban areas that it is assumed that residential form based code would be implemented for the area this property falls within. Main components of form based codes for this type of use are typically directed towards the following items: o The scale of building and appropriateness — The proposed development and building are of a size and height that are consistent with the surrounding buildings. Several properties in the area have multiple unit dwellings that are of a similar size and shape to the proposed building. o Condensed, but appropriately sized development — By constructing a multiple unit dwelling the proposed development looks to compact development, minimize environmental impact and be consistent with an area that is nearby to community facilities but removed from urban build out. o Public improvement and access — The proposed project would retain the existing community bike path and relocate the existing curb cut to a location that provides a safer environment for bike path users, as well as vehicles entering or exiting the site. Currently there are site distance issues related to the curb cut and bike path due to vegetative screening. It should be noted o Appropriate landscaping — The proposed project would ultimately involve significant landscaping along the access drive to create a better aesthetic to the property and provide additional screening between the roadway and development. • Sustainable Agriculture — The site does not have the potential for significant agricultural use. The property is a relatively small (+/- 2.0 acres) lot with little potential for agricultural use. • Conservation of Open Space — The site does not contain any existing open spaces and there are no designated open spaces adjacent to the project that will be impacted. The property is a relatively small (+/- 2.0 acres) lot with little potential to contribute significantly to conservation of open space. • Equitable Housing — Given the small scale of the proposed development, equitable housing options are not under consideration for this project. • Purpose Statement — The proposed development represents a modest residential development that is both consistent with the neighboring properties and meets the requirements of the zoning regulations. Its purpose is to provide a small amount of additional community living space that is becoming increasingly more popular in a desirable area of South Burlington, while also attempting to limit the development to fit in with the character of the surrounding area. In summary, we strongly believe that this project will benefit the community without inflicting any undue adverse effects to the surrounding area, public utilities and facilities or regional development plan. Furthermore, this project appears to be in compliance with the requirements as set forth by the interim zoning bylaws and municipal plan. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this Interim Zoning Conditional Use application and associated plans, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Jeffrey 3-sky, P.E. Cc: CEA File #12165 Gene Richards (via email) -LEGEfID Ensrv:c canaR —JJ6— PRDPO6EG cplfWR �� MPPDAaAR PRGMRIY LC£ • — - — — Al— ... A. SE1BAd I'll O IPDY fPi iWH0 u cD.rREIE I,oNuumT ranD ---56-- Geev y A. —I — —rv— roRLE uAw w -- 1eMee INI ---dC— OY£RifGD ELEcle.c - --UE— UROFRLRWNO fa'w --- --- i �-- III IP— UNE ....... — 0 — GAS UNE -- --ST— STDIM of— LPIE lei S£w£P MNINDEE ® sim. uuAlPr ..'Ahl S.tuT-01' Y a PO.ER POIA i 13 CATCtl .—I oil UGNI POIE 6rWi �• DILDUWS iP[E CDarEeW51PFE EDGE Ce—1/AUDDS —•--•— r[IiL'E --- — DRA eg SN'ME GENERAL NOTES I..111 We .... do rat porP., 1. eoneGWla r�p�nen1 of Wit I«ol•d upon III,— lo the wr yed PramNe.. L+hl'mg ulilty I«altos npprm'wele ody lh. C-t—ler .non Peld wiry Wl olHty cmPl". "I dbnepm•laa coal he en«ted Io Oro Engineer- The Cmboct« Mau smt«I Dig Sole HIM-344_2233) prier to my emelruelhn. 2. All •.Is1Mg utellNs not Mcorpore1. MI. the fool de elge .hall be removed « mmdmed oe ndkaled m the puns m di-1c it by the Engineer. 3. %. emir«tv Mou ihMun a21 oe-b—yeah Ile.) for oN undlIWW.d ulHDu, mole pime +hot I. eumhuted Ia the 0— of the L pl•Ilm of me pm).1. 4. The Cmlraeto, Mal repair/lntor1 all diMurbed at— (m ar Of the .Ito) a1 o dieet m Milled r•.u11 of (he cm trud. S Ail Weeeed meal ,hall be me'nlefned mile m!I ,eg•lelih, lee+lobl:Med. 6. Ua'nlaM all Inca Wilkie al cm.1-1- IMMI, 2. me C.nb«tor shot be respmf d• 1m all work ..I .... I he complete aM operable f«pltN, and u1piN•e D. 11 the ougdMg It le b..or.Mped, b«e.oe prmmlhn .h 1 be predd,d M —do— .11h ANWA MI4. Pe Sill Conir-I, Mee cm.trvct the wel<r 11. to I- feet obeo the f O.a door, sec mecnenL•d plum . '; demo, g. Toe Cmtieel« Man eubmil ehep 4roeMgl II, oil 11e.e old material. M—paroled Into the eila wort. w«k Mal net b.gN many Item ante shop dro—, ;Pr0- h granted. 10. In Oddi1'- le the reGUMemml. eel M thee, Phil and specllkel;me, the emir W mall complete the edM in « «done• nilh p'I p•rmli smdilbn, and my 1«d Pu61k w«Ma `almdora+. 11. Th. Will— le, W,h prod.. la of ple-1. eoteaye and hen arena Mdl be ell le.l. 12. Any decal,/ng necrosary Ior the compbllm of the .it -me •hill be Cmeld red e. Pall of lha rmlrocl eM Mal be the Cmtr«tor.—p—Vily. 13. The Cent —le. +hill o—W— of .«k eahin To.. Rood R.O.w..dih To.n Wtn«aie.. t4. Pe CedVactor .not h,toll the OW,kal, cool. and telephene eenkm M a««dense .iih Ine utility CehlPohlee reWkemenle. 15. Ed,1Mg pavement and Ire• .lump, to be re oved .hell be dlehlecd If al m ap,,—d Ot-vile lecethel All pe.—I cal, ehol be —G, eilh o pavement +ow. 16. If there ae YY mlltta or �ncmalilenckf .ilh the ptm. « apeclR<elion+, the C,,ht—le, .no,'. curl«t the Engkwer . h•.rigcelkn betas voh —I.— m the It.. M me,tkn. 12. Properly lirle Mlormal'm ie ba..it m o plan en1111ed'iallhse R of Wit - A Punned IN.idenlid D.Wd ml', doled May. 188T. prepared by fitep.111-E1...11M. Inc. and recorded M Vo. 252. Pg. 24 of the car of SW1h Dur:aplwi. Lend Pec«de. W, Pico 1. not a bound , +only end I. not Mlended to be u 4 oil me 19. The pr )W b—m-e, 1 343.2', 1. the norm umge boll ( o fee h Wrml I«aI•d en the welt itd. el Dereel St., pet caul, el me properly ftlic. Got— boxed o oled <Icwlkn rwn a UGSG Prod Top. map. Halo— dam. boxed m the obove referenced plan. OV m,=, r T' —n t i I � —• � / / i � ma's i I pli I �' / � / / I—iw• 1 A,Dome, I 4� / I I •wrw ( I � i � I 11 � 5B�•31:58•�•.....�,�i. c'eTrR.'rw� ' nmc,wa i RECEIVED I r~ JUN 19 2012 GRAPHIC SCALE MY of So. Burlington sue ESDlhrrn: I Civil ENGINEUIN6 AswilARS, INC. InwRl yiw A+e Ind �....r.�w Ziso JSO SAV DIfN6P: 900 DORSET ST. LLC 900 DORSF T STREET SOUTH DURLINGTON VERMONT 05403 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 900 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VFRMONT 05403 1 SOUTH HURLINGToN LOCATION MAP All EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN MAY 8, 2012 ..e.- s1Y}1a C1.0 1i}e5 SIiE E\GINEER: LEG - E»41BtC WNLWR —338--- PROPOSCO .'0,01 r — - - -- AFPROwvAlE PRdTAry u,t / CIYII fNGINltNINO ASSOCIATF$. INC. rS/ / wNL�bYID IMF. SWIMHRiIN^'b4�1aNbv — — . — . — ,PPROIAYAIC SETBACK lNE / J O IRbi Pn TbJ.+9 / / o cavcsETE uwlwar raxo / ./ �' ACL/JS0 — —65— gf1ANiY i£NER lMF r /' �� —N— fCRCE WM JS.G, — --N �— NARK IWf / / J SAV — --*E— OKRNEAO ELECTRIC — —LIE— YItOEAb10UN0 CLECINIC — — T — R1EPnbd 4F 1 _ -- / / r / / / / 900 --o— "IIJR[ ) I / / / / DORSET —Si— STORYW-AMUNC C'/ I ' j�_.__,_---•�"'� // // / ST. LLC � SEMLR YANHOlE 1 0 STORY VAxxa[ ayay / / BOOOORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON ® SMui-OFT �� ` na"iea auw+i N BS'S858' E/ J /1 _ VERMONTOS003 r! �<I j' YHOJECT: na UdTT ME } / Motclr� _� } I 'l.A..1' 1 PLANNED Q CEOOYOY9 ME RESIDENTIAL I g Y�Y FEE 0r BRYSN/'Co's ll 1 . ✓ ' Fib DEVELOPMENT -�--- -- -- ORAWA6L SWMC } - �,. STREET • II �� / �,,, SOFITHRURLINGTON VERMONFOS403 oo ZONING REQUIREMENTS I r OwdpY O�alrkl4- Nona 1 } I i / f1S1 I, Mf, Lp1 Sire: 11,00O e!/unit 6S, 82 of 81 d62 0 May. Oenslly. 2 YAlla/x,e 0.5 units/acre 2 Mgv. Bu2dNg Coverage (A): 20R i.8% 9.28 4 Mar. Lot Coverage (A); 40A I4.1R 2A.JR I ..- I I 1 } E(pnt Yard Sa —k (fl): m 41 41 1 II I .p1 Sfda Yad 3e1—k (11), 10 10 10 *"'a R., Yard SOb— (It} JO 46 46 1 I } t Mae. 8041ng Heog-Pilrned (N): 28 i25 � 325 1 YY I I SOUTH BURLINGTON DESIGN FLOW CALCULATIONS ` } 1 } �/' _ ` LOCATIONMAP Ermulg rate. oemaaa r snAa npY - „� ) @I , =ra One J bed,— nou,e O 210 gpd - 210 gad _ Prop0ud Willer Demand A seen Floe One J 8edraom none O 210 ad 210 9Pd I I i ( A� ilYx J nea.opm Ipm 0 21 onus A 221 gpd/lo,nneYaa - 630 gptl � 1 J'-- T.. - 210 gpd + 8J0 W - 810 gpd / PROPOSED CONDITIONS SITE PLAN MAV 8, 2012 ('..r - in 30' \✓?.0 12185 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of June, 2012, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-08, was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right- of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: See attached list Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this 22nd day of June, 2012. Printed Name: "i'4rea Phone number and email: ,,.lE,�, 6 01,ce4v, _ { r Er f Signature: Date: 2-2- t Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sarnpte Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-201' Adjoiners List As of June 1", 2012 Subject Property — Name Mailing Address Parcel ID 900 Dorset St. LLC 168 Summit St. 0570-00900 c/o Gene Richards Burlington, VT 05401 Adjoiners - Name Mailing Address Parcel ID Recreation & Parks Dept. 575 Dorset St. 0570-01000 City of South Burlington So. Burlington, VT 05403 Faith United Methodist Church 899 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT 05403 0570-00899 Homestead Design Inc. 8 Carmichael St. 1640-01098 Essex Junction, VT 05452 07/12/2012 21:35 1 ► SPRUCE MORTGAGE PAGE 02/02 roper y Owner u orizatir�t et r Owner Authorization Agreement for: 900 Dorset St., LL.0 Date: July 3"', 2012 This letter is to serve as permission for Jeffrey ®leafrom Civil En ineerin Associates Inc., to act as the owner, applicant or agent, to prepare and submit all documentation and attend all meetings pertaining to any of the following applications: 1. Interim Zoning Conditional Use Application 2. Development Review Board Site Plan Application This agreement pertains to the 2.02.0 acre property located 900 Dorset St. in South _Burlinsston, VT, referenced in the City of South Burlington's land records under Volume 1077, Page 177, Tax Map # 0570-00900R. Furthermore, I Eugene Richasrowner, do hereby authorize Jeffrey Oleskjjrom Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., to agree to terms and conditions, which may arise as part of the approval of the applications. Signature ofLProperty Owner Eugene Richards Name of Property Owner (Please Print) CAVIL sl IGII I ERI IG ASOSOOCIAHP'50, MCI. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 June 19th 2012 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning and Zoning Department City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Revised Plans Interim Zoning Conditional Use Application 900 Dorset St. LLC 900 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ray, Phone: 802-864-2323 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Please find attached five (5) full size and one (1) reduced size revised plan sets for the proposed planned residential development to be located at 900 Dorset St., in South Burlington, VT. I will email you pdf's of the plan set in conjunction with the digital submittal requirement. The changes include updating the existing and proposed utility service information and adding the zoning boundary to the plans. If you have any additional questions or concerns regarding the Interim Zoning Conditional Use application and associated plans, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, c\ r'' 1 Jeffrey, esky, P.E. Cc: CEA File # 12165 RECEIVED JUN 19 2012 City of So. Burlington CIVIL RA IGII I"ERING ASSOCIAHS. Il IC� 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 June 13'', 2012 Paul Conner Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Interim Zoning Conditional Use Application 900 Dorset St. LLC 900 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Paul, Phone: 802-864-2323 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Please find attached an Interim Zoning Conditional Use application for the proposed planned residential development to be located at 900 Dorset St., in South Burlington, VT. This project involves the construction of a new three unit townhouse, with each unit having three bedrooms. The existing single family residential house, as well as the existing barn and accessory structures, are to remain. In addition to the application, please find the attached associated supporting materials: - Associated Condition Use Application fee check for $178.00. - Narrative addressing Interim Zoning submission requirements. - Five (5) full size plan sets. - One (1) reduced size plan set. I will email you pdf s of the plan set in conjunction with the digital submittal requirement. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this Interim Zoning Conditional Use application and associated plans, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Jeffrey. esky, P.E. Cc: CEA File # 12165 Gene Richards (via email) �i southhurlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit # IZ- 4 - 0 (office use oalr) CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FOR THE CITY COUNCIL UNDER INTERIM BYLAWS All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the City Council. I understand the requirements and procedures required by State Law (Section 4415 of the Planning & Development Act), and that a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax900 #): -,eA 1 St , W-C(� 1�4~ S"."'-t J? lirlcl �on 1 05i'al 1��lorlG st ri �F� 9i 1 CrA; J�i t'+1�.,�h�-as Q i•erlci Ll��r�is '� LN r� 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) col. 10-11 &. I I I 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone, fax #) S<yriie a_' Dweller 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax #, if different from above): ru. ► 1D M,,o5f;e1J V►tw Lh , '&N �-II nj6n � T054o3 ehavtc A ' 1 Viol\ IN,* - L3L3v � i�c' 10��1 `bui, - 7--411 2.n>`,1 : , in_ X V1 - Contact e-mail address: ,�l<>sKy C i 4ptk- V+. cow, 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: q m Si 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: _ n5 "p009oDR- 7) PROJECT ZONING DISTRICTS) ge�,,Aeo% 4', al Z. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): -- - C'-------- u{ oe AVWet L'k-A, , - 'Lti"Ir is Ytave ���ret i7e drti . A ilne- cf 4Vw ex [ w} r41e el tln� g,na\c a„1, hu 7c ?vt4 17 >vn w6t e V e ' , e,1 b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): (e�,Aen�1�\ r --------- c. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): A11 ex,ylln�� uk,es �t cevvv ,.,. Kj,, A"ree u.,-,.t 4,,,,lip..;_. d. Description and Summary of all requested approvals from the City Council goet%,,l �� t- Fbnne,,l 12es �r,��,>t UrvF� io,eneoA L111� l'Gs'r Ll7 wV i\ a�i 10 -1 LL '(e(4%..ifeW,ev,k,!:� Jir �6,7 'z*,n.vig e. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): 9) SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. A completed application form and required submittal materials for the applicable review before the Development Review Board or Administrative Officer shall be included. In the case of a subdivision or planned unit development, all information required for Sketch Plan Review pursuant to Section 15.05 of the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) are required. In the case of all other types of applications, the applicable LDR submittals are required. Applicants are further encouraged to provide information demonstrating compliance with the review standards set forth in 24 VSA §4415 (d) and (e). 10) PLANS AND FEE Plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) of Interim Bylaw Council Application Form Rev 1-2012 the plans must be submitted. An application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agenda or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNE NT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: G / / /� I have reviewed this application and find it to be: CeOMPLETE ❑ INCO t ive Officer The applicant or perm ittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Interim Bylaw Council Application Form. Rev. 1-2012