Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-05-85 - Decision - 0895 Dorset StreetCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING HOMESTEAD DESIGN, INC. - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-05-85 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Homestead Design, Inc, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of 89-multi-family units in 24 buildings. The amendment consists of revising the building footprints to allow for a maximum of 54 sunrooms (154 sq. ft. each), Songbird Road. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on November 15, 2005. Bill Nedde represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is seeking to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of 89-multi-family units in 24 buildings. The amendment consists of revising the building footprints to allow for a maximum of 54 sunrooms (154 sq. ft. each), Songbird Road. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Homestead Design, Inc. 3. The subject property is located in the Residential 2 (R2) Zoning District. 4. The plan submitted is entitled, "Overall Site Plan Heatherfield Dorset & Spear Streets South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated May 14, 2003, last revised on 10/13/05. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS No changes are proposed as part of this application. R2 Zoning District Required Proposed 4 Min. Lot Size 11,000 SF 44.78 acres Max. Building Coverage 20% 7.9% �l Max. Overall Coverage 40% 20.6% + Min. Front Setback 30 ft. 7 ft. 4 Min. Side Setback 5 ft. >5 ft. 4 Min. Rear Setback 5 ft. >5 ft. �l zoning compliance + waiver granted pursuant to Section 15.02(A)(3) of the Land Development Regulations Sunrooms The applicant is proposing to reduce the footprint of the units and offer fifty-four (54) units that will include a sunroom. As the reduction in total building footprint will be just less than the total added sunroom area, the applicant has stated that this will maintain or reduce the total impervious area. The precise locations of the sunrooms have not been specified at this time, but the applicant has provided a document showing those units which may be built with a sunroom. The Administrative Officer will ensure that as the units are built, the total number of sunrooms does not exceed the proposed 54. DECISION Motion byLA9 1 Akr-W� seconded by t`��U%C� Td N to approve Final Plat Application #SD-05-58 of Homestead Design, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as amended herein. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plat submitted by the applicant, and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The applicant shall be limited to no more than fifty four (54) sunrooms in total. They shall further be limited to only those locations shown on the approved plan. 4. Any changes to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. -2- 5. The final plat plan (sheet SP-1) shall be recorded in the land records within 180 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Mark Behr Qeeanay/abstain/not sent Matthew Birham — yea/na abstai /not present Chuck Bolton —4—e ay/abstain/no resent John Dinklagenay/abstain/not present Roger Farley —/abstain/not present Larry Kupfermay/abstain/not present Gayle Quimby nay/abstain of presen Motion carried by a vote of -5- - o -j- Signed this 25 day of 2005, by v John Dinklage, Chair r Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). -3-