Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0575 Dorset Street
December 19, 2017 Re: #SP-17-83 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six(6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sin?on R yI Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Permit Number SP-- U✓ i(office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW DAdministrative El Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 P: (802) 846-4106 F: (802) 846-4101 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax ft City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 P: (802) 846-4106 F: (802) 846-4101 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Marla Keene, Development Review Planner Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 P: (802) 846-4106 F: (802) 846-4101 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: mkeene(@sburl.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 575 Dorset St 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at. Assessor's Office): 0570-00575 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Striping of north parking lot and reconfiguration of bicycle parking. Total number of parking spaces to be provided is 108. 103 minimum parking spaces are required. Total number of short-term bicycle parking spaces to be provided is 10. Seven minimum bicycle parking spaces are required. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 23,382 sf (building footprint) City Hall and Fire -Department and associated parking and sidewalk, all of which are to remain unchanged. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): no change from existing except addition of 5' x 6' concrete pad for bicycle parking d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 23,662 sf footprint (includes 125 sf shed and 155 sf storage unit) e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): no change from existing, max height of existing 2-story building is 26-ft f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): none g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 55 existing, no change proposed. Includes 18 firefighters who work in shifts of 5 persons each. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Parcel is located in the transit overlay district, Zone 2. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 249,303 Existing 9.5 % / Proposed 9.5 % / Sq. Ft. 23,662 sq. ft. 23,662 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 43.8 %/ 109,176 sq. ft. Proposed 43.8 % / 109,206 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing Proposed d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 30 % / sq. ft. % / sq. ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations) b. Landscaping: $0 $0 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): striping $250.00, bicycle racks $572.00 concrete pad for bicycle rack $500.00. Total $1,322. 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): no chap 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8-4:30 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: M-F 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: April 2018 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. ' Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNAtekE e APPLICANT ATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I / 1� /� REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete I mplet A inistrative Officer ate The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for; and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 December 13, 2017 Ray Belair 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Application for Site Plan Review Dear Ray, Please find attached an application for Site Plan Review for 575 Dorset Street. The Project consists of the following. • Striping the pre-existing North parking lot for 33 vehicles, including two accessible parking spaces • Adding a 5-foot by 6-foot concrete pad and two inverted-U bicycle parking racks to accommodate four bicycles near the fire station entrance • Replacing the existing bicycle rack near the City Hall entrance with three inverted-U bicycle parking racks to accommodate six bicycles. These modifications are being made to replace striping which was lost when the north parking lot was recently repaved, and to bring the property into compliance with current short-term bicycle parking standards. The plan showing the proposed modifications was prepared by myself. Hoyle Tanner & Associates, Inc. prepared the base map for the prior site plan application. We have made minor modifications to the base map to reflect current site conditions. Subsurface stormwater detention structures are not shown for plan clarity. The property is located in the Municipal zone. No changes are proposed to the 23,382 square foot building, the 155 square foot storage unit or the 125 square foot shed. The estimated interior square footage is 33,929 square feet, which does not discount for stairwells. As a municipal facility, 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet are required, resulting in a conservative minimum of 101 parking spaces required. The addition of 33 spaces on the north side of the building will result in 108 parking spaces. As an existing building applying for amended site plan approval, the property is required to provide seven short-term bicycle parking spaces in accordance with Article 13.14B. The proposed site modifications will provide ten short term bicycle parking spaces. The total construction cost is estimated to be $1,322, principally for upgrades to the bicycle racks. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at the City of South Burlington (802) 846-4106. Sincerely, Marla Keene, PE Development Review Planner Encl. ChEiNWT N8S'4700"w,�- - s :soec*,e, y sue; i STA i a t 6, 261 re��--�— ( � t i ,AREA 8r h( a S..,RF z OF, I. m_ .� b / 1 /. t. tK _ .. ., .. ^+ Aa4�� '. --: �*a � Tea 3 N a 4J. ....... ... 'Ho P+AN ,ii RYUNE A uR,X +.t I. -ROM wER AN 5 FEET TK,s4 3 .,, � ,,,C � 3 t �♦i � Iy,� , a / 6 MANHOLE WA': BACX 7 'y, :�.;. ! � i, �, i / uNAts..�. Y3t3:;'RiK IN- � Smyw : -GR..Aaz „ / ! R 'if2ih mu£ E�-a�,z"r�"BICYCLE PARKING (4 SPACES) B' CONCRETE AD, GRADE 1 I EiLL ct.. "" r I, TOWARDS GRASS fe4 �. A "�y - REPLACE NON —COMPLIANT : u�I \ " -� ......... I , \ BICYCLE RACK WITH THREE 3 U —RACK S (6 SPACES) lr } Q t t t so £ Y t� ,tom � 4 t L v . \ \ ^ � � i � \f \� A ♦.; Z� ^`y .ry r ,jj{j�j¢�A((�¢�Jy//////�////,;�� 4 � � � 141 _ r ♦ a Ek .. ;T M L` h •x � W �•� L-a \ "pad+ £' 4 ...�'a• f % 5-1 AiAt \ / It i, a 7:11 E ,,� .. ....... STA O L � t STA, Sa gg GRAPHIC SCALE d \ r j t 1 iE + i ( IN FEET) try "�2 3. OAF€CY' -: ` 1 inch = 15 ft 4 x ' \ ......... „ Vf .H `x1XK z 1 tL lli+ ,i+ y k; — PARCEL NOTE } N'1 1. PARCEL BOUNDARY IS FROM A PLAT RECORDED IN THESOUTH BURLINGTON D RECORDS ON XLY VOLUME 05. PAGE 744,, PROVIDED BY THE CI1Y3 ' 1977 AT \ 348.15� L O C A T i 0 N NAP — L£C£ND ....._ _.7 UNF. .......... GAS .;A„ .. JN T' NE i.. t 4 A. '.:m hiF F,,k.�Jo RE_ dLt;.AH:: *A N JN£ A kLVE IE•t R, YAN. „LF. W A Bs N bCNHUR,.0 �D Z.i JA�*N OP 0 _,. MAW— . .. d 4 , H a._ IREZ -NE R£ V 1 S 1. 0 N S SITE PLAN APPLICATION PARKING LOT STRIPING AND BICYCLE PARKING CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 575 CORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT TE 11/'12l<^017� 15 AF f. i' m 15' AWN BY A61K -,fICHE NED BY M URCE 9A5EMAP 8Y DDERNAP00 ASS'ODIA7M LLC January 3, 2017 Re: #SP-17-01 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, aymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax .802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Permit Number SP---- 6>1 office use only)' Y)' APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW DAdministrative El Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): City of South Burlington, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT p: 802-846-4107 f: 802-846-44101 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): City of South Burlington, 104 Landfill Road, South Burlington, VT p: 802-658-7961, f: 802-658-7976 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Tom DiPietro, 104 Landfill Road, South Burlington, VT p: 802-6.58-7961 f: 802-658-7976 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: tdipietro@sburi.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0570-00575 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com N 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Revisions to the previously approved site plan to reflect as -built conditions. Includes modification to parking layout. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): City Hall & Fire Department. The building (-23,500 s.f.), parking and sidewalk (105,900s.f.) are unchanged from previous application. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): City Hall & Fire Department. The buildinq (-23,500 s.f.), parkinq ain (105,900s.f.) are unchanged from previous application. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 23,500 s.f. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): N/A Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 E 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 249,303 Existing 9.4 % / Proposed 9.4 % / Sq. Ft. 23,500 sq. ft. 23,500 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 51.9 % / 129,400 sq. ft. Proposed 51.9 % / 129,400 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) N/A * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations) b. Landscaping: $ N/A $ 6,600 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): $235,000 stormwater improviement project, includes landscaping item listed above. 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): N/A 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N/A 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Completed 10/2/2014 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the cty's fee schedule. Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. a �±p p Dimly signed by David Wheeler a V I d W h V V I V,r, Wi1 e�n, OUa Dapatrm�eM of PublicWar1ks CN=DaviE 001e`: 2016 05.2011'. 46:01-04'W' TURE OF APPLICANT TUBE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: CompletXA;kdmin�istrativeLdMcer Inc m letg Da The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 southburin� PLANNING & ZONING May 27, 2016 Re: #SP-16-30 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six(6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Since r ly, r Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Permit Number SP--L (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW pp Administrative ❑ Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): City of South Burlington, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT r): 802-846-4107 f: 802-846-4101 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): City of South Burlington, 104 Landfill Road, South Burlington, VT p: 802-658-7961, f: 802-658-7976 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Tom DiPietro, 104 Landfill Road, South Burlington, VT p: 802-658-7961 f: 802-658-7976 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: tdipietro@sburl.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0570-00575 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT OS403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Revisions to the previously approved site plan to reflect as -built conditions. Includes modification to parking layout. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): City Hall & Fire Department. The building (-23,500 s.f.), parking and sidewalk (105,900s.f.) are unchanged from previous application. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): City Hall & Fire Department. The building (-23,500 s.f.), parking al y (105,900s.f.) are unchanged from previous application. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 23,500 s.f. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): N/A 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 249,303 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 9.4 % / 23,500 sq. ft. Proposed 9.4 % / 23,500 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 51.9 % / 129,400 sq. ft. Proposed 51.9 % / 129,400 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) N/A * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ N/A b. Landscaping: $ 6,600 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): $235,000 stormwater improviement project, includes landscaping item listed above. 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): N/A 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N/A 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Completed 10/2/2014 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan. must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the ci 's e g schedule. , I����.1 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Dg' "'signed by D'Wd Wheeler avid Wei e e l e r Wh' g . OU=Depat m�a t of Public Works CN=David ,Z2016.06 2011'46'01-0400 TURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: •yM REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ❑Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑Incomplete Administrative Officer Date X---/ The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 rM south' i ?,i. PLANNING & ZONING January 28, 2015 Re: #SP-15-01 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. STOk 1 Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com southburlington PLANNING & ZONING 01 Permit Number SP-�- (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative ❑Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I.ONV-1VER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT �((Na�%me, mailing address, phone and fax ft e,'h W 1,.v 1�+1'��1i70i� 57'i— OrC4 SFrw4 Sd, 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Tom _i7! rr�ln. IDfDUv 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ,�% i9ylk/ DEW"T 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): �570-40 ,r� 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want annroval for): b. Existing Uses on Propertay (including deiription and size of /ach separate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): �/► d. Total buildings uare footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): lid dW e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed build' n and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): J f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of emplo ees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): V 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 E 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 2A, M Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 9'97 % / 23 5—J6 sq. ft. Proposed q 97 % sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parkin ,outside storage, etc) Existing yy % / /0 sq. ft. Proposed yy 9 % l /o$, Wo sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) __ & _* * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 1 b. Landscaping: $ J0 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): ^ 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): ` , 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 1V/ 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section l 7.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. 21 ►S GNATURE OF APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 1 REVIEW AUTHORITY: 11 Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewe his site plan application and find it to be: Comp The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 OWNER DATE OF TRANSFER SALE PRICE VOL PAGE J ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPING REMOVED DURING SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY OFFICE PROJECT 1. 2- 6 inch diameter Crabapples in fair condition planted value of 2-3 inch Crabapples to replace(not replaced inch for inch due to condition of existing trees $1284 2. 1- 4 inch Apple in fair condition planted value of 1-3 inch Apple to replace $ 585 3. 25 foot Yew hedge removed due to extensive damage during construction no value $ 0 4. 20 foot juniper hedge in fair condition planted value of 6-36 inch Seagreen Juniper $ 468 5. 1-12 inch diameter Sugar Maple removed for risk abatement, no value $ 0 6. 7-8 foot PJM Rhododendrons planted value of 12- 5 gal PJM Rhododendron $1632 7. 3 Remaining Littleleaf Lindens in island in poor condition no value $ 0 8. 1-9 inch diameter Littleleaf Linden by Conference Room entrance $ 980 TOTAL VALUE $4949 ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPING TO BE ADDED DURING THE SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY OFFICE PROJECT 1. 4- 3 inch diameter Accolade Elm trees $2400 2. Soil replacement for Accoloade Elm trees (60 yards at $50/yd $3000 3. 2- 3 inch diameter River Birch $1200 TOTALVALUE $6600 _ I- _ 345.0', ^ I \ \ hASS)0 1 1 m o r, I 1 0 BIORETENTION FACILITY CLEAN OUT 1� r CAP ELEVATION = 308.13 �'• 10 TOP OF BERM 3D1 1 ) `, IM 3I / ELEVATION = +/- 307.7 _ r \I 1 '� IN IN 02. 1,... �1 DP IN 0 T = 3000 r -A HAL- RIP RAP SPILLWAY ^w LIMITS OF PEA STONE , gp OO / ELEVATION = +/- 303.7 RD ! i i I / OPAQUE FENCING / DUMPSTERS PAD ) \ wo m rn 4" CONDUIT TO GENERATOR / CROSSES ABOVE 15" HOPE STORM / LOCATION OF WATER LINE AS SHOWN ON SITE / \ \ PLANS PRODUCED BY THE CITY. LINE APPROX. LF r,[i.nTc I, Fa Q \ / 10 FEET FROM SEWER AND 5 FEET DEEP. \ i r- � � I / [MANHG..E WA`. RFt_KEG lIP IINARLE l0 OPiAIN IN VC HI / \ S \ // SNOW (SS) \ 4 \ ( ) ABANDON COAXIAL CC 123 #10 20' WIDE EASEMENT - \ -`- = CABLE APPROXIMATLY RIM 304.31 ` * BELOW FINISH GRADE 4 \ t \ FENCE LINE \ ` \ 4� \ 1 \ EDGE OF PAVEMENT = \ \\ WATER LINE \ m \\ l \ ELEVATION = 298.17 �\ /S ACE 1 S 1 \ OBSERVATION PORT \ RIM = 304.30 \ L INVERT =300.10 \ \ \ Z` OBSERVATION PORT #4 "\ a -11 RIM =1304.08 .� INVERT-1300.06 UNDERGROUND STORAGE AREA 1 \ \,44\\ a \ 'OBSERVATIONPORT IRIMIM- 04.36 NVERT =300.09 \ % OUTLEi7 PIPEo2- -� \ 18 HDPE/ INV. OUT = R99.93 / \ SPILLW Y v) _ \ l -303- COMCAST BOAC �- /. 11 i d \ ; Q ` STORAGE CONTAINER APPROXIMATE - LOCATION OF COAXIAL CABLE ROCK W/ _ 4" X 5" PLAQUE DOWNSPOUT CB #3 (TYP.) GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS k SPLASH GUARDS o, �F •.I OWME h' FAII Q ) OBSERVATION PORT, I '•.RIM - 3D4.10 ° INVERT = 299.93 1 1 \ Ij IN FCCT ' \ F IHPLE OAK `7 o// I Ir 'I i 1 NORTHERN UGHTS I AZALEA (TYP. OF 6) NVERT 8 CFF' PJM RHODODENDRON (TYP. OF 2) SNOW CB 1'Y. `� STORAGE (SS i 4" X 5" DOWNSPOUT (TYP.)i�- RIM EL. = 305.59' { INVERT IN = 302.14' VE LM INVERT OUT - 301.89' g- - It I I \ -BIKE _RAC wK3p1- #4 155SO Wo - RAMP / \I So ' 305- ' ) J y CREEPING SIDEWALK` r, CONDUIT TYP. 6) FOR FUTURE USE \ / 0W1-aacf 0E\\ Q FLAG POLE 30� 1 ( 1 ELECT IC RIVER BIRCH r PVC\ \ \ MOUNT AIRY OVE♦ICONDU", i \ FOTHERGIL.LA a 15 MINUTE \ \ (TYP. OF 5) PARKING \ 1 CB 0 5 ° RAMP \ TRUNCATED DOMES \ \ 1 OAK \ T8M p3 RCIT WISH -ARROW PCINTIKC 10 IT. 3069 � v SNOWr ' r^ STORAGE ) (SS) - PARCEL NOTE 1. PARCEL BOUNDARY IS FROM A PLAT RECORDED IN THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS ON JULY 13, 1977 AT _ VOLUME 105, PAGE 74, PROVIDED BY THE CITY. \ _ 348.15� S/TE PLAN SCALE: 1' = 30' jL L TRUNCATED DOMES YI I1 CRETE CURB Iq HOLE \ I C3 /B -.1 I(55) C1 \ I ASPHALT suRrACE" IRDS PAPER BIRCH s r S _ RIM EL. = 304.60 ACCOLADE° ,�,\ INVERT IN 289.80 - 305'' ELM INVERT OUT 289.70' I I STORMWATER MANHOLE W/HATCH \ ^ - TOP WEIR = 302.06 \, 1" ORIFICE = 300.1a _. M SNOW STORAGE (I S7 (SS) 1 2 NOTES: 1. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS APPROXIMATE 2. PVC CATCH BASIN STRUCTURES ARE NYOPLAST. 3. SNOUTS AS MANUFACTURED BY BEST MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. ARE PROVIDED FOR STRUCTURE 9 (MODEL 24R) AND 10 (MODEL 30R). 4. THE LOCATION OF THE WATER MAIN WAS LOCATED BY EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION IN THE LOCATION IDENTIFIED. CONTINUATION OF WATER MAIN FROM THIS LOCATION IS BASED ON CITY RECORD DRAWINGS. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE NO. RIM SUMP INLET OUTLET TYPE DIAMETER CB#1 304.88 302.98 103.55 (8"PVCTOCB#2) PVC 24" CB#2 304.65 301.42 303.21 (6" PVC FROM CB#3) 303.00 IS PVC TO CB #4) PVC 24" 303.19 (8"PVC FROM CB#1) CB#3 304,91 303.1 303.62 (6'PVCTOCB#2) CONCRETE - C0114 304.34 300.72 302.42 (9-PVC FROM CB#2) 302.17 (8'PVC TO CB #5) PVC 24" 302.42 (9- PVC FROM CB#12) CB #5 304.48 300.33 302.06 (8' PVC FROM CB#4) - 301.90 (8- PVC TO CB#6) PVC 24" 302.02 (8 PVC FROM ROOF) CB #6 303.88 299.67 301.34 IS PVC FROM CB#5) 301.20 (]S"HDPETO CB #9) CONCRETE 48" 301.65 (6' PVC FROM CB #7) CB#7 303.95 300.03 - 301.56 (6- PVC TO CS#6 PVC - CB #9 31M.05 298.82 300.61 (15" HDPE FROM CB#6) 300.42 (15"HDPE 105W CB) CONCRETE 48" 300.57 HDPE FROM CB #11) -(15" 301.39 (1S" HDPE FROM BID CB) CB #10 304,31 299.81 301.48 (6" PVC CAST) 301.32 (24" HDPETO SW CB) CONCRETE 60" 301.64 4" PVC CAPPED) CB#12 304.04 299.00 300.58 (15"HDPETO C8#9) _-_-PVC._ 30- CB #12 30S.10 301.23 302.79 (8- PVC TO CB#4) PVC 24" 301.02 (24"HDPE FROM CB#10) SW MH 305.06 298.23 3DO. 15 (15" HDPE FROM CB 09) 300.06 (18" HDPE TO SWALE) CONCRETE I., 300.23 (15" HDPE FROM STORAGE) BID CB 3D7.11 300.97 302.81 1 FROM 810) 302.56 (35"MDPETO CB #30 PVC 30" Code Scientific Name Common Name Size/Caliper Quantity AR Acerrubrum Red Maple 2.5'-3" 2 CS Cornus Stolonifera Redosier Dogwood 18' 24" High 6 WB Ilex ve rticil lata Winterbe 18' 24"Hi h 6 LC Lobeliacardinalis Cardinal Flower 6" 12 IV Insversicolor Blue Fla 6" 12 RL Rudbeckia laciniata lCutleaf Coneflower 6" 12 Note: Planting around flagpole Is all annuals. DI"„m 4A .in f, N,n rife ft- Lrnnr Lntranrw Plant Name Variety Quantity Alchemilla Mollis Thriller 8 Aquile is Gallon Mix 10 Astilbe Professor Wielen 8 Asciepia Tubemsa 7 Astilbe Visions Pink 7 Fern Mix 20 Echinacea Bri tStar 6 Hemerocallis Rosy Returns 10 Hemerocallis Stella Uom 10 Iris Sibrica Ruffled Velvet 8 Heuchera Palace Purple 9 Fothergilla Mount Airy 5 Creeping Cress 6 Rhododendron PJM 2 Azalea Northern Lights 6 SCALE: 1' - 30' I I I I 11 15 30 60 ENGINEER rn N wog Z a C) LL.I o� W M m Q O fA O U U o i� w }0 U U DRAWING NO. C-1.2A SHEET 4A OF 11 1 July 3, 2014 Re: #SP-14-31 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Since ly, /ayVmond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com A south urlington. PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- Iq - (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW El Administrative UlDevelopment Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): T6M A I, i.,r i ,Au r ,n_il D I f i rs 65 X -7gGl A-0 9 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): )t)ft df dkye 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: >,ickd9 �yrl • (,U✓l-) 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 57S -at-J - sl 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0.576 —6V5 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you `want approval for): / including description and size of each separate use): 1. i 1, c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain):�- d. Total building square footage on property (proposed "buildings and existing buildings to remain): o t'�fs� >`Ut// e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Ary o ckW /i,' f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): &g 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 } 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 2.31, Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing % / l 3,50 y sq. ft. Proposed l u � .� % / .230 501 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing ` i5 o % .150 sq. ft. Proposed y5. s % l IUy�'7)0u1 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing iz A % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. i d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) A- 7 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ �.tv b. Landscaping: $ c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): Sfof#14'41 f I rlprJW46. 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): A 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: ('� 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: F 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 013 l / I 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the tim�Qof submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city''ssJ fee schedule. � ,( / 7�w�`�t� �VI 6/�lllrrr✓✓✓(j� �1 " Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. S GNATURE OF APPLICANT r. SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER ("'tef PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 4 REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Com lete In 1 p pet 9 Administrative O ficer Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ray From: Tom Dipietro Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 4:16 PM To: Paul Conner Cc: ray; Craig Lambert; Justin Rabidoux Subject: FW: city office landscaping Attachments: City Office Landscape Budget.xlsx; LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY OFFICE.docx; CityHallSitePlanPZedits06l6l4.pdf Paul and Ray, The email below and information attached from the City arborist are being sent in support of our City Office site plan. In order to compensate for the landscaping that we are removing we are proposing to replace the Ash trees on the south end of the parking lot with Accolade Elm trees. This is in addition to the new landscaping we are installing at the entry way. We will also do some work to improve the soil media in this island to support tree growth. Per Craig's note in the attached, we are not proposing to plant trees in the thin island parallel to Dorset Street. His suggestions for what would be necessary to put trees in this location are also included in the attached. However, elimination of parking, installation of structural soils, or installation of a soil cell system are all well out of scope for the project and not feasible alternatives. We are therefore proposing the Elm trees. I have also attached a site plan that makes note of the addition of Elm trees and the changes we discussed at our meeting last week. Please confirm that I've addressed all the concerns you mentioned at the meeting and that once these changes are made we will meet site plan requirements for administrative review. I will then have the engineer update and return to you as soon as possible so that we can begin our public comment period. Thank you. -Tom Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works City of South Burlington Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Craig Lambert Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 3:30 PM To: Justin Rabidoux; Tom Dipietro Subject: RE: city office landscaping Tom and Justin, I've attached a budget for the proposed landscaping at City Office. The budget shows costs for replacing the existing 6 Green Ash in the island south of the side parking lot with 5 Accolade Elms. This should provide an adequate dollar amount to compensate for what ahs been and will be removed. Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clambert@sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY OFFICE STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 575 DORSET STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 HOYLE, TANNER & ASSOCIATES, INC 125 COLLEGE STREET, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 DIBERNARDO ASSOCIATES, LLC 440 ROCKINGHAM ROAD, BELLOWS FALLS, VERMONT 05101 T.J. BOYLE ASSOCIATES, LLC 301 COLLEGE STREET, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 f 0. , A, south MAY 2014 PREPARED BY: Hoyle,Tanner Associates, Inc. 125 COLLEGE STREET - 4TH FLOOR BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 BID SET # Lj w w af PROJECT LOCATION KENNEDY DRIVE LOCUS PLAN NOT TO SCALE ENGINEER GENERAL NOTES: LEGEND: DRAWING INDEX 1. THESE GENERAL NOTES SHALL APPLY TO ALL DRAWINGS IN THIS CONTRACT AND TO THE WORK THEY CONVEY. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 2. THE LOCATION OF UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR STORM SEWER LINE DRAWING SHEET COORDINATING WITH THE UTIUTY COMPANIES INVOLVED AND VERIFY IN THE FIELD THE EXACT LOCATION OF MAINS AND SERVICES NUMBER NUMBER TITLE TO PREVENT DAMAGE; LOSS OF SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION; AND FOR REPLACEMENT OF SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER LINE NOTIFY 'DIG SAFE* PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE EXISTING UTIUTES BY EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION ---- s ------ s ------ SEWER UNE METHOD. PAYMENT FOR EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION IS INCLUDED IN THE TEST PIT BID ITEM. ELECTRICAL UNE GENERALPLANS 3. LOCATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES. PIPING AND OTHER ITEMS AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM .. GAS LINE 1 TITLE SHEET AS -BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. LOCATION OF THESE ITEMS SHALL BE TELEPHONE LINE G-0.1 2 GENERAL NOTE S. LEGEND AND DRAPING INDEX CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DIG TEST PITS AS REQUIRED TO VERIFY LOCATIONS. THERE MAY BE OTHER BELOW GRADE STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN WHICH WALL REQUIRE DEMOUTON AND/OR RELOCATING IN ORDER TO COMPLETE TELECOMMUNICATIONS UNE THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT. THEREFORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS. AND DIMENSIONS OF CI CONCRETE MOUND FOUND CIVIL PLANS ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. STRUCTURES. AND OTHER FEATURES AFFECTING THE WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL BE DONE O IRON PIN FOUND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CONTRACT. CA.1 3 EXISTING SITE PLAN DECIDUOUS TREE C-1.2 4 PROPOSED SITE PLAN tl 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES. PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CONIFEROUS TREE C-2.1 5 STORAGE PLAN AND DETAILS PROJECT AS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. PAYMENT FOR RELOCATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER C-3.1 6 BIORETENTION PLAN AND SECTION ITEMS IS INCLUDED IN SITE PREP AND RESTORATION BID ITEM. THERE SHALL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR RELOCATION OF ---' •-"- CHAIN LNR FENCE C-4.1 7 SVVALE PLAN AND SECTION EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS. v, UnUTT POLE C 5.1 8 MISCELLANEOUS DETALS TEST PIT 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING ALL ARRANGEMENTS FOR ANCHORING, SUPPORTING AND/OR RELOCATING AND PROTECTING ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL COSTS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICES BID. IN THE CASE • BOLLARD LANDSCAPING PLANS OF DAMAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF ALL REPAIRS. -- CURB L-100 9 SITE LAYOUTAND PLANTING PLAN 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF THE EXISTING FEATURES AND STRUCTURES WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE WATER LINE GATE VALVE L-200 10 PLANTING AND SITE DETALS So WORK. IN THE CASE OF DAMAGE, THE REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AS FIRE HYDRANT of 4 APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. ® SEWER MANHOLE ~ U n a o 7. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS. THE MORE STRINGENT ❑ CATOI SASN SHALL APPLY. MONITORING WELL TO TOP = ELEVATIONS OF PIPE 8. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ELECTRICAL MANHOLE ���m�y�S€I:,,�,, m ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. TELEPHONE MANHOLE 9. THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. CARE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES SG" p�gsiy DURING CONSTRUCTION AND COMPUANCE 'NTT STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS REGARDING SITE SAFETY SHALL SOLELY BE THE LIGHT POLE ho8- CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. tf CLEAN -OUT zwzWgW'd�S m 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL WASTE BUILDING MATERIAL, CONCRETE, MASONRY, TREES, SHRUBS, DEBRIS, TREE UNE oL?��oA _ EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND OTHER MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT WORK AND AS REQUIRED BY THE OWNER. CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH VERMONT LAW. fi �H ALL TREE STUMPS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED OFFSITE LOCA11ON ACCOMPANIED BY A STATE ISSUED INSIGNIFICANT o d - WASTE MANAGEMENT EVENT APPROVAL. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS 3 INCWOING HAULING SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR. $ STOCKPILED MATERIAL NOTES: U 5 s o 11. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR DETERMINED NOT TO BE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT, OR DETERMINED TO BE = EXCESSIVE DISTURBANCE OF THE AREA FOR THE PROPOSED WORK SHALL BE RESTORED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. fro Y 1. ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED PRIOR TO 12. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER/OWNER AND THE VERMONT STORMWATER INCLEMENT WEATHER, GRADED TO SHED WATER, AND =� s MANAGEMENT MANUAL, VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, LATEST EDITION. COVERED AT THE END OF EACH WORKDAY WITH A L -A MINIMUM OF 20-MIL BLACK POLYETHYLENE. THE w' } 13. ALL DRAINAGE OUTLETS SHALL BE LOCATED AND APPROPRIATE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES COVER SHALL BE WEIGHTED AND WILL BE MAINTAINED W C� b INSTALLED AS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL DEWATERING AND OPERATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPROPRIATE THROUGHOUT THE STOCKPILE PERIOD. C _T IS AGENCY REGULATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REQUIRED DISCHARGE SAMPLING AND TESTING AND SHALL C 4)- BE INCIDENTAL TO THE DEWATERING OPERATIONS. 2- STOCKPILE AREAS WILL BE GRADED SUCH THAT - 2 - 0 STORMWATER IS DIVERTED FROM STOCKPILED 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO E ENGINEER FOR REVIEW MATERIALS. SILT FENCE WILL SURROUND ALL THE W AND APPROVAL, ALL BUOYANCY CALCULATIONS FOR - 8 ^ o L�, _ H S i (- UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE NEED AND SIZE OF CONCRETE ANCHOR SLABS STOCKPILES. SLOPES ON STOCKPILES SHALL NOT BE 0 I- - TO PREVENT FLOATATION AND PROVIDE APPROVED CONCRETE ANCHOR SLABS IF REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR SHAH STEEPER THAN 1:1. DESIGN AND • H� o PROVIDE THE REINFORCING STEEL REQUIRED IN CONCRETE ANCHOR SLABS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN THE STRUCTURAL Y 0 CONNECTION BETWEEN STRUCTURES AND CONCRETE ANCHOR SLABS TO PREVENT FLOATATION. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE �Q I,Q STAMPED BY A VERMONT REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR REVIEW. c®S ly 15. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION DATED 2011, AND ITS LATEST REVISIONS, AND THE AASHTO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES, DATED 1996, AND 2002 INTERIM FOR HS25 LOADING. 16. ALL STORMWATER TREATMENT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES ARE REFERENCED FROM THE VERMONT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL, VOLUME I-STORMWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS, BY THE VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, DATED APRIL ❑ 2002. 1 z Z w g W X 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. q> (.9 W 18. CONTRACTOR TO USE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION DETAILS IF CONSTRUCTION DETAIL IS NOT SPECIFIED. S J Z W z 19. THE CONTRACTOR IS REFERRED TO THE LANDSCAPING PLAN AND DETAILS ON DRAWINGS L-100 AND L-200 FOR LANDSCAPING, W Z SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND PAVING SPECIFICATIONS AT THE CITY OFFICE COMPLEX ENTRANCE. FOR LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS AT �a m H-- O ALL OTHER AREAS, THE CONTRACTOR IS REFERRED TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 02900 AND/OR AS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. �o Z 20. NOTES AND DETAILS ON DRAWINGS L-100 AND L-200 APPLY ONLY TO THOSE IMPROVEMENTS AND NOT TO OTHER PARTS OF THE I J PROJECT. I^ w ❑ a0 W Q C� DRAVANG NO. G-0.1 SHEET 2 OF 10 N E S DRAINAGE STRUCTURES �O0®m c.Birtr� IONS---.— '. • rtusN 545.0 - tnn O,a.O. O,az, euz srav y..510T_4 h} 0, rae.,er \ IXtq \ BlEn ` \. • 1� \ rt.s��__ b y Q1 y ENGINEER =g= o Z .- FZ w Z V U � zz is ORANING N0. C 1.1 o zo 4o Bo SHEET 3 OF c.Birtr� IONS---.— '. • rtusN 545.0 - tnn O,a.O. O,az, euz srav y..510T_4 h} 0, rae.,er \ IXtq \ BlEn ` \. • 1� \ rt.s��__ b y Q1 y ENGINEER =g= o Z .- FZ w Z V U � zz is ORANING N0. C 1.1 o zo 4o Bo SHEET 3 OF 610RETENTION FACILITY (APPROX. 1600 SF.) SEE DETAIL ON OWG. NO. C-3.1 N8��IN --- 345.0' TRANSID)II PA'- FOUND IRON ROD tE GMMUNICAFONS--� (�1 LS' 0 FLV41 CABINET y I 1.1W 5 31O.21V LIMITS �R* RNATS 8-1 B ASPHALT SURFACE 9 PILOT CHANNEL 1 ff33 RECHARGE STATION- / WOODED 1 _ .••' /ROOF DRAIN .a- 1 / I / I •� YF PLATFORM r SEE 0 = WIF71' / PROPOSED OPAQUE l Ty• FENCING / I I A/C UNII \ I / 1,9 I • + I MOLDING TANK \ SWAP BURUNGTON COVERS FIRE STATION • ¢u4NCAna ,Pb3 (9a HE1a� SILL EL. = 309.6s' / PI�NHS O�OuWATER Eo erUTIE ACSITY�UNE APMON DX GENERAroR PAD jjyMN/ y�(/7 / 10 FEET MOM SEWER AND 5 FEET DEEP. a /JC :" X 5" DOWRISPOUT ROOF DRAIN (7yp.) / MANNO.E WAS BACKED lB. \\ \ SHED - �\- NVERi 8° - 3 UNABLE TO OBTAIN INVERT. \ .° j SUMP INVERTRT - 302.78' .78' SHED \ \ �TRANSFORMER PAD RIM EL - \` \ \ IN IN 20' WIDE EASEMENT INVERT OV (/\ 6. (1.E� SILL EL. = 30A.96' SILL EL W5.2d, \ \\ \\ BUILDING LIGHT SEEN UNDERGROUND STORAGE \ s \ N - (TYP. \ ` ♦ GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS (MAINTAIN 10' SEPARATION FROM \\ \ \\ ®' h SPLASH GUARDS EXISTING SEVER \ ( ) SEE DETAIL ON DWG. N0. C-2.1 \ BY OTHERS \ \\ J' \\ _, SWAP BURUNGTON BK UNSTNIPEO INPERMW ) MUNICIPAL OFRCES A( PARKINri.. AREA ''- Il {' X 5" DOWNSPOUT F \ �\ (TYP f SPOU \ \ \ \ GUTTERS, DOMN�Ol1T$ d SPLASH GUARDS \ WODDEO\\�\BUILDING LIGHT 1 \ EDGE OF GRAVEL % \ \ \`\\\\\��%\ v \` \ I, NEW STORM WATER CATCH BA9 \ STRUCTURE. \\ SEE DETAIL ON DWG. NO. \ REGRADE EXISTING SWALE V H \ L \ IBM R2 $PIKE IN ROOT \ Di 1RIPLE OAK N. SEE NOTE 12. su EL . ws.as', --TRANSFORMER l'AD iH GUARD_ I _ MW 7 309.11' NW 6 MS "' WATER LINE NOT MARKED IN THIS AREA - 02.14 I )! T - 301.99' SPLASH GUARD I 7. (TYP.) ��VC PUNTER NNLBOx lLIATPA" ( T. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTIUTY COMPANIES INVOLVED AND I VERIFY IN THE FIELD THE EXACT LOCATION OF MAINS AND SERVICES TO PREVENT DAMAGE; TO PREVENT LOSS OF SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION; AND TO ASSURE PROPER REPLACEMENT OF SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY "DIG SAFE" A PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. sroP 2. GUTTER INSTALLER TO BE CONTRACTED DIRECTLY BY CITY. 3. DEPTH OF ALL CATCH BASIN SUMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 18". ro R 4. PVC CATCH BASIN STRUCTURES SHALL BE BY NYLOPLAST OR APPROVED EQUAL >1 5. SNOUTS AS MANUFACTURED BY BEST MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. OF LYME. CT, {"£v' SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR STRUCTURES 8 (MODEL 24R) AND 10 (MODEL 30R). y 6. THE LOCATION OF THE WATER MAIN IS UNKNOWN. GROUND PENETRATING RADAR CWAS USED TO TRY TO LOCATE THE WATER MAIN AROUND THE CITY OFFICE Y COMPLEX. BUT IT WAS UNABLE TO BE LOCATED. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE WATER MAIN BY EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL ABANDON PLACE EXISTING STORM DRAINS LOCATED UNDER b L SIDEWALKS BY CAPPING AND FILLING WITH BLOWN SAND OR PLOWABLE FILL ALL OTHER STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULED TO BE REPLACED SHALL BE REMOVED. e. CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE AND/OR PAVE IN THE VICINITY OF ALL NEW CATCH BASINS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE STRUCTURE GRATE, AS NECESSARY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGRADE SWALE ONTO STATE OF VERMONT PROPERTY AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. OWNER WILL COORDINATE ACCESS WITH VTRANS TO FACILITATE THIS WORK. TBM 10 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXTEND LIMITS OF GRAVEL PARKING AREA TO COMPLETELY BDLr WTH ARftow POINTNG rp IT. .V.. 3TO.n' COVER UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY. FINAL GRADING SHALL BE APPROPRIATE FOR VEHICLE PARKING. 11. CONTRACTOR IS REFERRED TO LANDSCAPING PLAN AND DETAILS ON DRAWING L-100 AND L-200 FOR LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, CUBS AND PAVING AT CITY TELECOM.IUMCAOON, OFFICE COMPLEX ENTRANCE. LANDSCAPING AT ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE AS CARNET NOTED AND/OR AS SPECIFIED UNDER SPECIFICATION SECTION 02900. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL TERMINATE 8" PVC STORM DRAIN ABOVE GRADE W/CAP FOR FUTURE CONNECTION TO DOWNSPOUT. 2 SEE NOTE It. �( 8" PVC V t1l (I SEE NOTE I I X IT. S III 1 REPLACE EXIST sD WITH 6' PVC \ l 11 \S l ( �\ ASPHALT SURFACE QUTCF�T ROTEC IDN�.s + TYPE TONE RI RAP ASPHALT SURFACE II. RIME � 304.60 INVERT IN . 289.80' II .S INVERT WT . 299.70' TRAP u i I -- BOLT WITH ARROW POINTING TO IT. `.\ " 30 Rv WOODL METER SOCKET - PARCEL NOTE - `"t TRANSFORMER PAD 1. PARCEL BO ANY IS FROM A PUT ROOMED IN THE SOUTH BURUNGTON LAND RECORDS ON IuLY 13, 1977 AT VOLVME 105. PAGE 74. PROWDED BY THE OTC. l \ VEGETATED SWALE - TELECOM CABINET _ --- - SITE PLAN SCALE: 1' = 30' FOUND NON 1.5° a FLUSH 2 PIRMSEDDRAINAGE STRUCTURES 5'RLTJRE NO. NM SUMP INLET OUTLET STRUCTURE DIAMETER 1 304.96 302.23 303.73 (B"TO SD2) PVC 24' REPLACE 2 304.58 301.90 303.22 I6° R10M 5D3) 303.22 18" fROM SD 303.00 (8" TO SDI) PVC ' 2C REPLACE 3 304.88 303.93 - 30160 I6°TO SD2) CONCRETE ExIm NG 4 300.31 300.75 302.50 (B"fROM SD2) 3Dx.so le"fRGMSDI2 30125 (IT TO SOS) PVC 24" REPLACE S MC37 300.36 302.00 IB"FNOMSD4) .2.. B'FILOM RDOf 301,85 (8'To S06) ! PVC 24" REPLACE 301.22 (IT FROM SOS) ROM 07) TO S . CONCRETE 48" BEATING 7 303 �5 30DAT 30LS6 6 PVC - EXISTING 8 3D350.{. 29867 300.12 135 FROM SD9) _ 300.0 (35�5D6 ° ) TO SW ce CONCRETE - ---. _.. . 48' REPLACE 9 303.41 298 93 300.58f (]SFfROMSSW) 30043 117TO SOB) CONCRETE 4B' REPLACE 300.58 ]5 FROM SDII 3a1.46 (W FROM BIO NB) 10 30440 299.82 301.46 16°EAST) 301.32 (2C TO SWCB) CONCRETE H.P REPLACE 30177 le NE -CAPPED) -(IY 1. '0.00 1 299A2 300.62 TO 509 PVC 3(7' )ffiPIACE 12 305 00 . 301.25 - 302.75 (8"TO SEMI) - PVC 23" NEW 301.20 (M"FROMSDIO) SW CB 305.00 I, 298.OD 300.011 115"FROM SOB) 299.90 118'TO SWALE),:CONCRETE 71' NEW 300.00 1S" FROM STORAGE BIO CB 3W.50 31C000 302.75 (6"FROM BIO) 302.50 (15°TOSDIO) PVC 30° NEW �-OE'CTRICAL CABINET Scientific Name Common Name Size/ Caliper Quantity A-rubmm Red Ma le 2.5"-3" 2 Corpus Stolonifera Redosier D wood 6Ilex K verticillata Wirnerber 18"-24" Hi h 6Lobelia cardinally Cardinal Flower 6" 12Ids Verslcolor Blue Fla 6"12Rudbeckia NOW.. Cutleaf ConeOower 6" 12 SCALE 1" - 3T 0 13 30 80 ENGINEER w r � U � � w �a a aso=gsgs��;i: ups -N � o 55= L m s Fz -��_ W tog u DRAWING NO. C-1.2 SHEET 4 OF 10 8'-1 2'- NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PIPE AND ALL APPURTENANT STRUCTURES PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, 2. GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN THE VICINITY OF THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY HAS BEEN PERIODICALLY MONITORED FROM JULY 2012 THROUGH JANUARY 2013. OBSERVED GROUNDWATER ELEVATION HAVE RANGED BETWEEN APPROX. 297.1' TO 300.2'. 3. ISOLATOR ROW SHALL BE COMPLETELY 'WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC (AASHTO M2LI8 CLASS 2 NON -WOVEN). RstR uD ! FRAMe H2O LDA0 RATING, AS MIfA1FACTUNED 9YA U[19D OUT EAT FOI PIACDH ETOF LEVATION NYLOPIAST W REPROVED EQUAL OU ! FRAYS AT RMSH GRADE FEEVA1gN n0 4 SANS AT 12' MM. C/c WITH CAST N PLACE CONCR:IE CDEAR STIRRUPS I WADI. TEMPERA,IME OR PRECAST RNO-T RISER ! MMYUY RDNFORCEMENI) —COEPAC SNFCT BDIROW GDeLL UNDER CDUN HIE NSD, BAODILL YATERAL COMPACTED PER ASTY D23V (DI/JIEIFA ! HDOIT VAR6) Notes: 2 UINI� R.N• J .t Mo Fx RM•r Sl ae.N sties IM Rgarylm uaRn T. A-M Deranwtl•n N.w. Cw.M TIN, Ap•N.t ln. M..... R. s••w r1 Pr•Nnl TIN, From Fo7 Or Adh••rHlrrqq To HDPE Cp�y�Up�• MG NbFa M)r YMlmd 5•tWnnl Twl M•Y Guar NN TIN Cano•M• CMs Ntlleut Tran.l�lnp MY q 11N IA.A To R. HOPE RIM. RISER ELEVATION DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE z-1D t/z-20'-0' 4 a ROW WRAPPED ISOLATIXt/ED2'-10 12' RISER WITH GEOTEXTILE ROW 7/2" 15• STUB 1/2• 1 2 ISOLATOR ROW DI%9a BAFFLE AS SHORN ON ISOLATOR ROW' UVERSON BAFFLE AS ( 1 1 2 B 1 I 2 B ) DETAIL , 1 1 2 940M ON DETAIL 0 O S/4' ; 2 ; B B t I 2 ( 2 ) t B t 2 B 0I 3/4' 1 1 2 2 1/2' 2 �12• RISER V-2' SPACING (TYPICAL) 55'-7 1/2' 12• RISER X_ p— or BM Rigw x xNa1w N.a.w.H .r Nra. Amnm raw.. BILL OF MATERIALS MARK DESCRIPTION Na REOURED A Ir Elbow 0 B 18' THPM T. 8 c IS" Elbow wltb 12' RI- ! 16" SWb I D 1e' ni— wifH 12' In— 3 1 18' PIP. (20'-0' Lang) 22 2 18' AID• (W-lor Lon,,) 11 19. 1 p Ana d Caaplw. 30 -ALL 16' HDPE RPE 5 NLLY PERFORAIED, LO(nTE Mm -ALL DMEN90NS ARE NOLNNAL (UNLESS OIHERNSE NOTED) ONE 0 nrnNG NM ISOLATOR ROW DIVERS 0N BATFLE c RANG NTH ISOLATOR ROW DIVERSION BAFPIF. UNDERGROUND STORAGE PLAN SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 6' X 1/2- HOPE ISOLATOR 2•_41/2• ROW DIVERSION BAFFLE, 10 3/4'-t--1'-5 3/4" SEAM WELDED TO HOPE € A-1 PIPE INTERIOR 15' SNB 8- 18' I L 10 3/4' 18' I.D. 1 1/2" O.D. 18' I.D. 1/4 21 1/Y 0. Ir PoI I' -Ill 3/4 1 B 1'/ I.D. D� 7 A L 21 1/2' o.. A J TOP VIEW € tY PogR 15'ST"e INVERT (MDDEN)� FITTING ,.C.. DETAIL -(1) REQUIRED- il 2'-4.1 /2' SECTION B-B FITTING "C' DETAIL SCALE NOT TO SCALE 18- I.D. 21 1/2. O.D. 18 LD. 21 1/2I' O.D. —� L B 18• LD. --1 �r-,•� j L 21 1/2' G.D. A J TOP VIEW FITTING "A" 1' 1-11 a/4—.4 DETAIL SECTION B-B -(2) REQUIRED - FITTING "A" DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE SECTION A -A SECTION A -A RISER 5' Me /e INVERT 1 ENGINEER BELOW DIMENSIONS IN FEET € 2.79 18" CORRUGATED HDPE BEDDING DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 22' COMPACT BACKFILL MATERIAL 12' RISER € EL 304.00 GEOGRIO MATERIAL EL 302.15 44D"7 WASHED, OPEN OSITYANGULAR 8' STONE JI ED. GRAOED. ANGULAR AGGREGATE GRADED. 40R VOW RATIO SHALL BE WRAPPED IN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. s i i N IS' STUB EL 300.00 8' STONE 401E VOID RATIO is 0 8m� 44'^�3g m EL 299.35 gg>�? 4OX POROSITY WASHED. OPEN NOTE GRADED. ANGULAR AGGREGATE z €o SHALL BE WRAPPED IN 40R POROSITY FOR WASHED, OPEN GRADED. ^4- GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. ANGULAR AGGREGATE E iag I= t€�» w ELEVATION VIEW DETAIL aw; SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 8 HE! Hip 'm 8 3 36' X 30" ALUMINUM HATCH AS MANUFACTURED NY BILCO OF NEW o o HAVEN. CT. OR APPROVED EQUAL 8 RIM EL 305.00 5 - w fi� MAX FL 303.50 OF FINISHED GRADE EL J02.83 c 3 V L.A `o EL 301.93 o y ALUMINUM RAILS C 0! EL 299.90 8• C 2 CONCRETE S EL 298.00 _ % 0 aL n LA O 5 PVC STOPLOGS O 5• WADE EA. I. ORIFICE SECTION e w r 9' 15' HOPE TO/FROM MIN. UNDERGROUND STORAGE INV. IN s 300.00 24' HOPE FROM BIORETENTION FACILITY INV. IN. - 301.20 z iw 2 (n 4' OFFSET FROM n J CENTER OF MH Q A 8'-0' I.D. DIAL MANHOLE = ¢ LLJ w O 15' HOPE FROM CB NO. 8 INV. IN 300.00 o LL O O zQ NW 18' HDPE LLo LL (n INV. OUT - 299.90 �� Z O> () F 4- (TYP. ci IT- (TOM •) \ DRAMNG NO. PLAN UNDERGROUND STORMWATER STORAGE CATCH BASIN Cj-2 p 1 INLET/OUTLET DETAIL SCALE: 3/8' - V-O• SHEET 5 OF 10 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING ALL ARRANGEMENTS FOR ANCHORING, SUPPORTING AND/OR RELOCATING AND PROTECTING ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL COSTS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICES BID. IN THE CASE OF DAMAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF ALL REPAIRS. 2. STORM DRAINS CROSSING EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED NTH FULL STORM DRAIN PIPE LENGTHS CENTERED ON THE POINT OF CROSSING. 3. THE MAIN COLLECTOR PIPE FOR UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.005 FT/FT 4. UNDERDRAINS SHALL BE PLACED ON 3'-0' WIDE SECTION OF FILTER FABRIC. 5. CATCH BASIN SHALL BE PVC, BY NYLOPLAST OR APPROVED EQUAL, 30" DIAMETER NTH BALL VALVE ON END OF 6" INLET PIPE. BALL VALVE SHALL BE A 6" SCH 40 PVC COMPACT BALL VALVE WITH LEVERAGE HANDLE AS MANUFACTURED BY RED FLAG PRODUCTS OR APPROVED EQUAL. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT AS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. PAYMENT FOR RELOCATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS IS INCLUDED IN PIPE AND STRUCTURE BID ITEMS. THERE SHALL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR RELOCATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PLANTS WITHIN THE BIORETENTION FACILITY AS INDICATED IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE (SPECIFICATION 02920) AND AS LOCATED IN THE FIELD. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL PILOT CHANNEL TO ADEQUATELY CONVEY STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM WEST EDGE OF EXISTING PARKING AREA TO BIORETENTION FACILITY. VT SPEC. ITEM NO. 649.31 "^ ` " •' 'r ITEM N0. 706.04 PILOT CHANNEL DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE ITEM NO. 649.31• GEOTEXTILE 1/4"0 HOLES (TYPJ 6"0 PERFORATED PIPE DETAIL 9. CONTRACTOR IS REFERRED TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 02900 FOR LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATION SECTION 02920 FOR BIORETENTION FACILITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL OPAQUE FENCING WITH DOUBLE SWING GATE AROUND EXISTING DUMPSTERS. HEIGHT OF FENCE TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD. SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 02835 FOR FENCING REQUIREMENTS. JM PONDING DEPTH = 6" 307.5 -- 3" OF MULCH 6" PVC r CHOKER LAYER. NO. 8 OR NO. 89 ......... .................. WASHED GRAVEL 4VEL CURTAIN DRAIN FOR OVERFLOW /4" - 3/4" STONE) WITH 3" ABOVE 6" PERFORATEC AND 12" INFILTRATION SUMP BELOW. _- SCH 40 PVC PIPE 6" PERFORATED SCH 40 PVC PIPE INV. EL-30275 OUTLET STRUCTURE (RIM ELEV. 307.50) TOP OF BERM ELEV. 308.00 ENGINEER iELEV. 307.00 ITTNG MEDIA- rc 1 0 MIN ELEV. 7� adz 7 z U 1 i op �y . 303.75 ELEV. 303.50 Z .... .. ...................................... o y ELEV. 301.75 p� o } x --- 1B' 20' BIORETENTION FACILITY SECTION SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C5 TRANSFOIIMER PAD— CABINET CE NET MUNICg11IXJS�� SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" N81-4700:& -- M%.il' UMTS OF BID ALTERNATES 9-1 t B-2 uw s r PVC OBSERVATION PLANING SCHEDULE PER - T SPECIFICATION 02920 Mw' A uw 6 -3.1 ,I� Sossa' U4DFRDRAIN SYSTEM _ •• AQ �4y pp I'll ASPHALT SURFACE BIORETENTION UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM DETAIL SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0" <b=g€ g m APPROXIMATE SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEV. 300.75 -UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE FkF LS u� m = as 3 0 5 50 � FOUND IRON ROD s y 1.5• . RUSH - V Um�a a j a .ts � 3 C o p _ u�a N 2 N i4 r ''i L _ AP.111`, PILOT CHANNEL I RECHARGE STA R014,, -ODEp �ftOOF ORAN� PVC CATCH BARN "''PLATFORM ,f OUTLET STRUCTURE vLL EL. 3ov.71' (RMA ELEV 307.50)DWO, }* _ PROPOSED OPAQUE FENCING. SCE DETAIL ON DWC. NO. C-5.1 tf T SEE NOTE I A/C UNIT . • HOLDRIG TAN SWTH SURUNGTON 15" HOPE ( tt COVERS > mwacwna FIRE STAVCN INVERT OUT - 302.50 t L9p 1glkli R SILL WAT]t LINE NOT MAW IN THIS ARFA GENERATOR PAD /rt yr SHED ��ROOF DRAIN C� • /1 NVERT B• CPP + 30314' SUMP INVERT . 302.]8' SHED s �THANSPORMER PAD RIM EL 305.59 INVp2T IN 302.14' r�^p4. is 6 — SILL EL. " 304.96' INVER T OUT 301.89' PLAN SCALE: 1" - 30' `I O b o Z a z a U Z F- :3 Q U m Z Ln Lu 70 N LL.I IBM /1 _ 7 W U � Q POIN..0 TO T.7 LL O ELEv.: S10.n' a 0 m U TELECp.1MUNICA110 NET DRAWING NO. C-3.1 $CUE 1• - 30' 6 10 I I I I 0 is So 60 SHEET OF WOODED EDGE OF GRAVE_ NOTES. 1. THE GRASS CHANNEL SITE SLOPE SHALL BE 4.0% OR LESS. 2. THE GRASS CHANNEL LOCATIONS SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON DWG. NO. C-1.2 SLOPE FINISH GRADE TO GRASS CHANNEL PROPOSED GRADE g f i VARIES �� 2' -- VARIES GRASS SWALE SECTION DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. NOTES: 1. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WIN THE UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED AND VERIFY IN THE FIELD THE EXACT LOCATION OF MAWS AND SERVICES 10 PREVENT DAMAGE; M PREVENT LOSS OF SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION: AND M ASSURE PROPER REPLACEMENT OF SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DLO SAFE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 2. CUTTER INSTALLER TO BE CONTRACTED DIRECTLY BY CITY. I DEPTH OF ALL CATCH BASIN SUMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1B'. 4. PVC CATCH BASIN STRUCTURES SHALL BE BY NTLOPIAST OR APPROVED EQUAL & SNWTS AS MANUFACTURED BY BEST MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. OF LYME. CT, SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR STRUCTURES B (MODEL 24R) AND 10 (MODEL JOR). 0. THE LOCATION OF THE WATER MAW USED UNKNOWN. GROUND PENETRATING RADAR WAS US TO TRY TO LOCATE THE WATER MAIN AROUND THE CITY OFFICE COMPLEX, BUT IT WAS UNABLE TO BE LOCATED. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE WATER MAIN BY EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL ABANDON IN PLACE STORM DRAIN LOCATED UNDER SIDEWALK BY CAPPING AND RULINGWITHBLOWN SAND OR FLOWARLE FILL ALL OTHER STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULED M BE REPLACED SHALL BE REMOVED. & CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE AND/OR PAVE IN THE VICINITY OF ALL NEW CATCH BASINS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE STRUCTURE GRATE, AS NECESSARY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGRADE SCALE ONTO STATE OF VERMONT PROPERTY AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. OWNER WILL COORDINATE ACCESS WITH VTRANS TO FACILITATE THIS WORK. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXTEND LIMITS OF GRAVEL PARKING AREA M COMPLETELY COVER UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY. FINAL GRADING SHALL BE APPROPRIATE FOR VEHICLE PARKING 11. SPECIFICATION SECTION 02900 SHALL APPLY TO ALL LANDSCAPING OUTSIDE OF THE LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE CITY OFFICE ENTRANCE SHOWN ON DRAWINGS L-100 AND L-200. 12. SEE PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TABLE ON DRAWING C-1.2. FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES DETAILS. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIRAFI 14ON OR APPROVED EQUAL UNDER TYPE II STONE RIP -RAP. STONE LAYER SHALL BE MINIMUM 1.5 FEET THICK AND EXTEND 14 FT. IN LENGTH. RIP -RAP STALL NOT RESTRICT DISCHARGE FROM VEGETATED SCALE. 14. OUTLET SHALL BE 16' MOPE EXTENDING APPROXIMATELY 1E' TO SCALE DISCHARGE INVERT ELEVATION AT SCALE - 299.60. PLAN SGAIF. 1- - 201 SCALE: 1' - 20' I 0 10 ?0 b ENGINEER DRAWING NO. C-4.1 SHEET 7 OF 1 O I C 2.0/ MAX. LEVEL SIDEWALK g LANDING RAMP X 5' MIN LEVEL LEVEL LANDING LANDING C 24� :C: 8.33/. • • MAX. DETECTABLE_,, -CURB WARNING SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE 6 DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE CURB DETAIL NOTES: I. WHEN CONCRETE SIDEWALK IS CONSTRUCTED 1/� ADJACENT TO CONCRETE CURB, ASPHALT TREATED FELT SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND CURB FOR THE TOTAL DEPTH OF THE SIDEWALK 2. CAST -IN -PLACE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 616.06 OF THE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE FOR CURBING SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 541 OF THE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE, CLASS B. THERE SHALL BE A MINERAL ADMIXTURE SUBSTITUTION FOR PORTLAND CEMENT OF 20% FLY ASH OR 25% GGBFS. CONCRETE WILL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND TESTS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH QUALITY REQUIREMENTS. 9" -- CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB TYPE B DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE CATCH BASIN GRATE ADJUST TO GRADE WITH PRE -CAST CONCRETE RINGS (SHOWN) OR L INFRA -RISER' AS REO'D. --• (12' MAX) 48' DIAL I - IT• H-20 TOP SLAB $�B N.T.S. 24' C CLEAR OPOPENINGRISER SECTION 1' 4' `,,.. REFER TO DETAIL A w48' DMA. MIL - HOLE CUT TO PLAN 6. 1'-8' SUMPNIN. SEE PIPE CONNECTION DETAILS THIS SHEET TONGUE dL GROOVE JOINT DETAIL N.T.S. 6' BEDDING ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE CONCRETE, CUSS AA. (4.000 PSI). CIRCUMFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE 0.12 SQ. IN, PER LF IN ALL SECTIONS AND SHALL BE PLACED IN THE CENTER THIRD OF THE WALL. THE TONGUE OR GROOVE OF THE JOINT SHALL CONTAIN ONE LINE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT EQUAL TO 0.12 SQ. IN. PER LF. RISERS OF V-4' MAY BE USED TO REACH THE DESIRED ELEVATION. STEPS ARE NOT ALLOWED. • CATCH BASIN GRATE SHALL BE 2! SQUARE. HEAVY DUTY. WITH 2' SQUARE OPENING PATTERN. PRE -CAST REINFORCED CONCRETE CATCH BASIN & DROP INLET DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE NOIES: 1. NOMINAL RAMP DIMENSIONS AND GRADES: RAMP WIDTH - 4'-0" MINIMUM RAMP SLOPE - 8.31 MAXIMUM RAMP CROSS SLOPE - 2.07 MAXIMUM 2. DUMMY JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT TRANSITIONS (GRADE CHANGES) AT TOPS AND BOTTOMS OF RAMPS. 3. NO VERTICAL "LIP" OR "CURB REVEAL" WILL BE PROVIDED WHERE THE RAMP ADJOINS THE ROADWAY. LEVEL LANDING RAMP 5'- WIDTH MIN. RAMP CURB TRANSITION SIDEWALK LEVEL FLAT LANDING OR 2 07 MAX CURB 8.3 MAX. 8.3/MAX. SECTION B-8 SECTION C-C SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE 6 DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE r 3.25• r 1.75• T � 1- I} o _� I 036* 031.87 CINEN90NS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY ACTUAL LTMENSCNS MAY VARY, COW04SMS ARE IN INDIES (RATE MEETS H-20 LOAD RATING OUHJTY: MATERIALS 94ALL CONFORM TO ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05 PAINT. CASTINGS ARE FURNISHED WTH A BUCK( PAINT LOCKING DEVICE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST PVC CATCH BASIN DUCTILE IRON FRAME AND GRATE DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE (1, 2) INTEGRATED DUCTILE IRON FRAME h GRATE TO MATCH BASIN O.D. MINIMUM PIPE BURIAL DEPTH PER PPE MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATION ,e (MIN. MANUFACTURING�_�r RED. SAME AS MIN. SUMP) (5) ADAPTER ANGLES (3) VARIABLE INVERT HEIGHTS VPfIABLE 0' AVAILABLE (ACCORDING TO ACCORGNC TU PLANS/TAKE OFF) I1�PLANS -UKE_CA�KE7 _ ASPHALT IMPREGNATED Rnle QUT 0, RECESS POLYU THAN A RUBBER -LIKE 1 1/2' X 2' O-RING SET APPROVED PREFORMED IN RECESS BITDMA SEE NOTE. SEALANT 3 i POLYTITE ROLL-N-LICK BITUMASTIC O-RING (OR EQUAL) (OR EQUAL) NOTE: ALL GASKETS AND SEALANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS DETAIL -A NOTES: 1. HORIZONTAL JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONS OF PRECAST CONCRETE BARRELS SHALL BE OF A TYPE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, WHICH TYPE SHALL. IN GENERAL DEPEND FOR WATERTIGHTNESS INSIDE FACE UPON AN ELASTOMERIC OR MASTIC -LIKE OF MANHOLE GASKET. 2 PIPE TO MANHOLEJOINTS SHALL BE FILL WI I MORTAR ONLY AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND GENERAL WILL DEPEND FOR PIPE WATERTIGHTNESS UPON ESTOMERIC U SEALANT. 3. FOR SITUMASTK: TYPE JOINTS THE ISTAINLE55 AMOUNT OF SEALANT SHALL BE STEEL SUFFICIENT TO FILL AT LEAST 75% OF STRAP THE JOINT CAVITY. RUBBER-UKE FLEXIBLE SLEEVE LOCK -JOINT FLEXIBLE MANHOLE SLEEVE OR EQUAL IS' MIN WIDTH GUIDELINE GUIDELINE TRAFFIC LOAE& OONCRETE SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE FOR GUIDELINE PURPOSES ONLY ACTUAL CONCRETE SLAB MUST BE DESIGED TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION LOCAL SOIL CONDITIONS, TRAFFIC LOADING, h OTHER APPUCABLE DESIGN FACTORS. THE BACKFRL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE CR OTTER GRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS II - MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321. BEDDING & BAGOTLL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL NL RACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WTH ASTM D2321. (3) VARIABLE SUMP DEPTH ACCORDING TO PLANS ' (10- MIN. BASED ON (4) VARIOUS TYPES OF INLET NIL OUTLET MANUFACTURING RED.) ADAPTERS AVAILABLE: 4'-30' FOR CORRUGATED HOPE (ADS N-12/1HANCOR I DUAL WALL, ADS/HANCOR SINGLE WALL), N-12 HP. PVC SEWER (EX SDR 35), PVC DWV (EX: SCH 40). PVC C900/C905, CORRUGATED & RIBBED PVC _ WATERTIGHT JOINT (CORRUGATED HDPE SHOWN) NOTES: ...m..,,.A/.g 1. GRATES/SOLID COVER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05. 2. FRAMES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRACE 70-50-05 3. DRAIN BASIN TO BE CUSTOM MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAILS RISERS ARE NEEDED FOR BASINS OVER 84' DUE TO SHIPPING RESTRICTIONS. 4. DRAINAGE CONNECTION STUB JOINT TIGHTNESS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM 03212 FOR CORRUGATED HOPE (ADS N-12/HANCOR DUAL WALL), N-12 HP, do PVC SEWER (4--24'). 5. ADAPTERS CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE 0' TO 360'. TO DETERMINE MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS PVC CATCH BASIN DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 6' MIN ENGINEER KOR-N-SEAL JOINT SLEEVE OR EQUAL NOTE - INS L SEAS FROM DRY SIDE OF PENETRATION. WET SIDE ALTERNATE METHOD -CORE DRILL LU AND BOUT, WTH WATERPROOF MECHANK;A SEAL NO SLEEVE REDURED WALL THICKNESS o ~ U) Q C) 1 I W PPE O.D. + 2 1/2' Z 1 I OR AS NOTED o N Q J S.S. STEEL AND NEOPRENE S? O LL J W (LINK SEAL) WTH WATER STOP r (� Y- 1/2 WALL THICKNESS r, (n THROUGH EXISTING uALL EPDXY BONDING COMPOUND CUT OR BEND EXISTING_. __1 REINF. AS REQUIRED DRAWING NO. WALL SLEEVE DETAIL C-5' 1 MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE DETAILS SCALE: NOT TO SCALE SHEET 8 OF 1 0 TMO(5) —BENCHES BY SOUTH REFER TO RAIN GARDEN Y BURLINGTON SOII NIX ON DETAIL L200 JCSG(S)— 1__r— IE(15) BIKE RACK O LIMB EXISTING TREES NORTH OF PLAZA AND SIDEWALKS FOR INCREASED VISIBILITY OF BUILDING ENTRANCE V Vf BU INC "J MEMOR L FLAME 9V SOUTH , BURLINGTON i \ r OI tOU1N BUREINOTON EN TRVWAV P LAN T BCH EDULE O • 0 G_!r� Cab x evr/c Nmne COmnwn Ibne 4eze Spec Neres ] AO ACERprsuR __.. �P.p.puA,Ypla Pr' DSB mWu slsxn },some.. ' MNM _— 6 11d1 TAKUS m.dlf Yi , b I . Nart�e �,e �� Sze SFlx Nared 9 H 35B I JCHC JUNroERUSW H.Ep Ca_WmnMs• Or..nG Imo oar J�^P.r d rt• DS6 ___ - — S JCSO JUNIPERU3cn 8• n Ory Cod. SCAMM/c NI— Ctrnmal Nens S�z. SAa Nxas IS 10 AM ANG ALCHBALLAnIWII.'Au,M..' ANEMONE— L.Ey. W.. W IO M rm Ccn: S AD MUNCUS CIoEY, Ocam,NrO .2 coot 1. AT MCLEFeSNMm.. Bu W..o f2 Con[ 1. AVP As"m LnInM.R W_I. PANS N.O., I. ft', 3. ee: nw f2Cont OONOTSUBwIMSIONS^ 60 OF DENNSTAEOTU un IbO. W NI1M. •e rr Purym C.nNo+.r nm 12 Cant 1. EP ECHMIACEAPu YM M f1 Con[ 20 NKR HEMEROCALLIS Nmoeh Ro„' K.beY R... O. .' nm f2 Con[ 2B NSD HBMERacALLls srM Daa� srw oae o.l nm IE 1E IR9.nsaM V .,. B u. P.a E.. I" doN J.p.n.N NY ES n.o 2 cn .SBCAoStSHtl Con 1.E PLSSK NS Sm PSrCuneU:.NCNOITRIU.... ..- bD.rMCmN..r ny No mB.N M.n.awm o;f _GC. DORSET STREET T. J. Bo7,e Associates, LLC pme moncmnm,m ou IrspM wrlw"' dM landscape architects. plBnningconsuEanls 10 neD watsnou South Burlington City Hall Entryway T 1 sor r:one9e strEeT. bunington. vermont. Dsaot eoz.ese.3ss5 MpmAw.upo,le.wm " ©� �Bo t ta^a• Site Layout &Planting Plan '+�— 1 o0 DETAIL B MIN. 11- t TREE NTSSO�FFSIGNS TO TREES IS P0.oHISITED. PROTECTION iF�ssHouLD DIE vaoPEn�r�MiiNiARNiD. cWaNALnvs MLL RE 6 AREAO1AVaD NJLA3V TORROOOµMMENNPIACFIGPOBISFORMESIGN9. 61RONS SH W LD SE POSTED SD Oc. AND MMN 2D OF THE WO MJNG 3e DENDOFEACHIMCETOIMV gM TOALCMITKMTWN f W NMDI87URS R9O TO s ePERSONNEL. :MN9 TO BE HAVE MIT PASTIMEDAGRO N THE ORANGE Is TW. �•� TRff ROOIL T.9FW9 TO H%VE AYMRE UCKG10JN0 AND ORARGEOR RED LExi. Y STEEL OR WOOD POST DETMLAJ_///�HpHLYM9HLE FLAOONO MA% 1 / _BEWRE fENCE TO NOR60NTAL 3'%6'ALONOTOP -- _ ORANGE MESH SNON FENCE B'WPE V'r09ECURE BOTTOM OF FENCE '?T ANCHORPOSTABUST8E INBTALLED TOA DEPTH DIG NO LESSMAN IUD IM TOTAL HT. OFMETCML HEIGTTOF THE POST. -'- NOTES ISFDICE SERVEWASATREE ED I TECTION DDADA DULY. NWALE901EBEAVOWED LGHNTCONSTMJC 3. FENCE SMALL BEMPNTPNEO MRWaWUT CONSTRUCTIDV. '�- L SIGN, SEE DETAIL B MOVE S TYPICAL PROTECTIVE FENCE DETAIL 200 TUTS T TREE PROTECTION DETAIL L200 TUTS EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS, INC. 301 SPRING STREET (��y"� @� 1 :/,`=,� � ��dC.1 09Wl FAST FREE: 1- O-62S.MI 753 TOLL-0439 FREE:(E:160 i$ a 1Y `e / (! ii Il $ E S T.18 8 3 2264653 PHONE: (231}5362261 FAX:(231}5364A58 MN ejIW.Wm PRODUCT NUMBER IHWc _%P9LPFNf ON TBOBT - BOMPIATEBERTOW LETTERED TAG AREA (£Sllw i£AlUPEB 6 MATERIALS'. PATEAOVIRON O ASiMPM CLUB O O b IS 0 CESKNLOM 0 6 o IF o b O Is 0 0 0 A 000 LWiTJG 00 MED O O OE9LN INDENT IN WM D O OMGUAMMM ADAPAESSELRY b 0 b b b O O b GLWENf3 VBNTHOLE3 k •bbb boss SUPRESIEMNI3AFMT: b b 0 b 4 0 b b GORR090NNESISTNi3 23M' 9 2NF MANTENNJCE FREE EECTONBB ANCHOR U. ShFunE0N3TALIATIM (2 RACESy D.BS' n B4iTMl NEW SECBW�� NOTES L INNMS110NT0 BECOIPIEI®INACCORWVJCEMMNAAfACTLNER39PE0F1CgTpS 2 OONDTSGLE J. CWTRAC FOR SNDIE: PIIOWCT ADD CpFAN NFGRLIABONMSIi NAM.CPDSFIFh.eaMlR NOM FOR FOR REFEtE10E NJM3EN Bi60N DURALAST" DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE DMP 3C(2A IT IS C1IPYRIGHT- I vITJre wvuw.CADdalails.eom B TRUNCATED DOMES DETAIL L200 TUTS IM PSI CONCRETE BROOM FINISH 4%4WB.0X WB.O WELDEDMRE MESH 12 MIN, CRUSHED GRAVEL COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SOIL tAON (MIRAFII FILTER FABRIC NOTES: -PROVIDEEXPAN ICNJCINTEVERY2V - PROVIDE CONTROL JOINT5 AS SHOYM ON PLAN, 19- In THICKNESS OF SLAB - DO NOT USE CALCIUM CHLORIDE OR OTHER MATERIALS CONTAINING ANTIFREEZE OR CHEMICAL ACCELERATORS. •AIRCONTENT. bT%AIRENTRAINMENT MAXIMUM WATER-CEMENTIROUS MATERIALS RATIO: OM �\-SLUMPLIMIT'. 3 'PRIORTOANYWATERREDUCINGADDITNE / ° \ CONCRETE PAVING DETAIL TUTS LWIWRAL PUNT ...a: I TE AND VENFY THE EXISTENCE OF ALYnUIE9 PRIOR To s�rAairNCl'�nGLIiILc�A 2 QUAMTRIESAIFFICENTTO cabvLETE THEE viANILa�MPOPLAYJGINDILL ORRANINUX N AAER=.TANMROFORFNAL WALL UR6ERYTO HsioxOMw3D PUBLISHED BSDME NB ER T ASIOCWnON OF NURSERYMEN. a PUTNTOTHEOR DBEWPORERWGHTAADNO'M8MN FMI9HEDAND APPROVED BY ME PROJECT DSCAPEARCHITECTOR EOUAL A. FINAL IDUERiONMLSERY PRACTICES THE MAY' REQUIE RE REMONNO SOIL M M FROE TOPMLL OF ME ROOT TO LOCATE ME ROOT-E. A. ALL oNTANER GAOVN As SPECFIEDSNOCONTAN RORAOVN STOCKVALL BEMCEPTED IFRIa Rooi BOUND. Mu PINOMATERML MADEOF SYNTHETICS DR PASncg (HALLBE AT ME MWO1 MANTING. T BE REP-DAND CONTANER BALLL WALL AL 9E CUT THROUGH TIME SURFACTHE CONTAINER SHAE IN PAID VERNAL ME LOCAIWNS. MEDAYPRW PRIOR TO PTNAAND H DMME LOCAMH OF L TREES RUSSWLLL SE KRAPPROYAL IT . PRUNE TO REMOVE DEADWOOD S CROSSING BRANCHES. UBOULDBE BELTEDTEODETHER.ONOUSEROPEoRw1REI HoE SLEEVES. - ROOTFLMI EBHALLBEPUIREDATORSLIC LVABWEFNALGRAOE (DUE O NU RSERYPRAMICES. MLS MAY REWIRE REMOYWOSOL FROM ME TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TO LOCATE 111E ROOT FWEL 2'-3- FINE CHIPPED BARK MULCH, NOT MORE. DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLYAGAIN9TSTENB 2'EARM SAUCER. Y X T X IF HARDWOOD STAKES 3 PER TREE DRIVEN INTOGROUND. WITAKNO TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTNOJ ANENO BACKFRL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP CLOGS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND BTONES. {\ �{I-- BCARIFY SUBQRADE TO K-, UNDLSNRBEOORCOMPACTE EE SKE .EX �1IIIF` CUTSREMOVEALLOF LEMREBA9RETpE,EXCEPTDATMHCHK S nMES UNDER MEEOOTBALL LFAVENOMJRLAPI OSEDABODE THE SOIL DMMETERCF SURFACE.FUNPISMD-NATMMRBER. B'SROOf ROOT BALL BALLT BU RWNDREMOEAL BUTTHBEIANION UNDRMER 00. SAIL. . CUT ANO REMOVE NL MITMATMIICN WEME ROOT BALL. A MULTI -STEM PLANTING L200 NITS PLANT w EDGE LAWN PER PLAN, V REVEAL NA% LAVIN i • TJFNECHIPPEDBARKMULCN.NOMORE. WHOPCOVER FOLOOE. REFER TO SPECIFKATWNS. < 10' MNIMJM MANT BEO OEPTI CONTAWNG W TOPEOL ARD IG BbT'y1 Fi } COMPOST MX(FOR RPN SWROEN MANTNGSOL MMSEETABLE J Ny1 NA?�'9µM,f �VG ABOVE, UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED 90L. / 3 \ PLANT BED DETAIL LYV TUTS 2 SHRUB PLANTING L200 TUTS PRUNE TO REMOVE DEADWOOD I CROISINO BRANCHES, ✓ Cw A • TOP OF ROOTEALL TO BE GAME HEGHT AS PRENIOU9,Y OROVW. Y FIE CHIPPED. RNE BAPK MULCH. NOTMORE. DO NOTPUCEAOANBT PLANT T.. EARTH SAUIEI. END BPLKFILL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND sTONEa. uE.B. FROM TIP 11 IF ca1TANR OROVML REMOVE POTS BURLAP COMPLETELY LOOSEN ROOT MASS TO PREVENT GIRDLING. ITIMES OLMAETER OF ROOT BALL uxasTURBEO OR COMPACTED SIR, MOUND. MBLE PERFORATED PLASTIC TREE WTUP (TO BE REMOVED ME YEAR AFTER PANTNGJ. 3 2' %S HARDWDOD STAKE5113 HDEHT OF TREE OR MIN. OF TY. ALLOW FOR A DEPM OF IT BELOW UNDISTURBED GRADE. (STAKING TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PIANTNOJINSTALL STAKES PLUMB. ROOT FLARE SHALL BE PUNTED AT OR SIJGIRLY ABOVE PEAL GRADE 1GUI TO NURSERY PRACTICES, THIS MAYREQUIRE REMOVWGBOR -ME TOP OF ME ROOT BALL TO LOCATE ME ROOT FARE} ME CHIPPED BARK MULCH, NOT MORE. DO NOT PUCE MULCN GIRECTLY Al3MNST MUNI 2 EMM SAUCER. AMEND BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES. SCARIFY AIBOMDE T03'. CUT REAL OF MEMARE BASKET, EXCEPT THAT WHIM IS 3TIMEg UNDERMEROOTBAL.-SHOSURW EXPOSED ABOVEME SOIL OONETE0.0f SURFACE .REMOVE BURWFROMMETOP IROFROOTBALIF8URW ROGTB�L MVADE OFNANRAL FIBER. IF BUFLAP IS PLASTIC OR TREATED, CUT AND REMOVE ALL BUT THAT WHICH IS UNDER ME ROGT BALL. / T \ DECIDUOUS TREES < 3" CALIPER TUTS LC PAGNH mM H.MIM.landscape.J. BrDmreDAssociplanninates, L MJB n u a�onsrzol3 South Burlington City Hall Entryway T • (/� (n. 301 college street. burlington. Vermont. 05A01 W2 .658 .3555 Im "N,- LIFIS.Dan m MJB 1' = 10'-0" Planting & SILE Details +�- ` 0 �+ LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY OFFICE 1. 2- 6 inch diameter Crabapples in fair condition planted value of 2-3 inch Crabapples to replace(not replaced inch for inch due to condition of existing trees $1284 2. 1- 4 inch Apple in fair condition planted value of 1-3 inch Apple to replace $ 585 3. 25 foot Yew hedge removed due to extensive damage during construction no value $ 0 4. 20 foot juniper hedge in fair condition planted value of 6-36 inch Seagreen Juniper $ 468 5. 1-12 inch diameter Sugar Maple removed for risk abatement, no value $ 0 6. 7-8 foot PJM Rhododendrons planted value of 12- 5 gal PJM Rhododendron $1632 7. 3 Remaining Littleleaf Lindens in island in poor condition no value $ 0 TOTAL VALUE $3969 In the current configuration, the island in front is unsuitable for trees or shrubs. There is not an adequate volume of soil to support tree growth and because the island is so narrow, shrubs will be continually damaged in the winter during snow plow operations. If trees are desired in this location there are several options: 1. Change the angle parking along the island to parallel parking, increase the width of the island and excavate and bring in quality soil to support tree growth 2. Install a soil cell system on both sides of the island to provide the trees with adequate soil volume 3. Install structural soils on both sides of the island to support tree root growth PROPOSED LANDSCAPING COSTS FOR CITY OFFICE QUANTITY SIZE SPECIES UNIT PLANTED COST TOTAL COST 2 2 inch Paperbark Maple, Acer griseum $660.00 $1,320.00 5 18 in. ht. Dense Yew, Taxus media 'Densiformis' $75.00 $375.00 1 8ft. Ht. Green Column Juniper, Juniperus chinensis 'HetzColumnaris' $480.00 $480.00 5 4ft. Ht. Seagreen Juniper, Juniperus chinensis 'Seagreen' $145.00 $725.00 5 2 in. Accolade Elm, Ulmus x 'Accolade'* $660.00 $3,300.00 1 5 gal North Star Pie Cherry, Prunus 'North Star' $192.00 $192.00 *Replacement of 6 Green Ash with 5 Accolade Elm in island south of side parking lot will require soil replacement to support tree growth. Approximately 30 cubic yards@$30/yd $900.00 TOTAL $7,292.00 Paul Conner From: Tom Dipietro Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 4:16 PM To: Paul Conner Cc: ray; Craig Lambert; Justin Rabidoux Subject: FW: city office landscaping Attachments: City Office Landscape Budget.xlsx; LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY OFFICE.docx; CityHal]SitePlanPZedits06l6l4.pdf Paul and Ray, The email below and information attached from the City arborist are being sent in support of our City Office site plan. In order to compensate for the landscaping that we are removing we are proposing to replace the Ash trees on the south end of the parking lot with Accolade Elm trees. This is in addition to the new landscaping we are installing at the entry way. We will also do some work to improve the soil media in this island to support tree growth. Per Craig's note in the attached, we are not proposing to plant trees in the thin island parallel to Dorset Street. His suggestions for what would be necessary to put trees in this location are also included in the attached. However, elimination of parking, installation of structural soils, or installation of a soil cell system are all well out of scope for the project and not feasible alternatives. We are therefore proposing the Elm trees. I have also attached a site plan that makes note of the addition of Elm trees and the changes we discussed at our meeting last week. Please confirm that I've addressed all the concerns you mentioned at the meeting and that once these changes are made we will meet site plan requirements for administrative review. I will then have the engineer update and return to you as soon as possible so that we can begin our public comment period. Thank you. -Torn Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works City of South Burlington Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. if you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Craig Lambert Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 3:30 PM To: Justin Rabidoux; Tom Dipietro Subject: RE: city office landscaping Tom and Justin, I've attached a budget for the proposed landscaping at City Office. The budget shows costs for replacing the existing 6 Green Ash in the island south of the side parking lot with 5 Accolade Elms. This should provide an adequate dollar amount to compensate for what ahs been and will be removed. Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clambert(o-)-sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. BIORETENTION FACILITY (APPROX. 1600 SF.) SEE DETAIL ON DWG. NO. C-3.1 TRANSFORMER PAD FOUND IRON ROD TELECOMMUNICATIONS �� 1.5 0 FLUSH CABINET A ^'F'JCC. ENGINEER N8_1I N' I M w�oDED f i �, 309 71 � ) • \ t MW jqq5 31 310 24 �. LIMITS OF BID ALTERNATES B-1 & B-2 MW J - 310 a• �,: .... M W 6 e 'a ASPHALT SURFACE PILOT CHANNEL__, 4i WOODED PLATFORM / PROPOSED OPAQUE FENCING c„ >+ 'i« /mod d'�, ) �t. / A/C UNIT` " + HOLDING TANK OVERS 1 COJFIUNICATCN TONER v \ (9Dd HBOiF)777 / LOCATION OF WATER LINE AS SHOWN ON SITE / PLANS PRODUCED BY THE CITY. LINE APPROX.'GENERATOPAD \ W� 10 FEET FROM SEWER AND 5 FEET DEEP. T ( '4 / S SHED 4 1 MANHOLE WAS BACKED UP. h UNABLE TO OBTAIN INVERT. \\ t, Kl'••• �, ,.. ✓ SHED „717-TRANSFORMER PAD 20' WIDE EASEMENT \` \�� �W 1 /1i /Ro SILL EL. = 309.71• SOUTH BURLINGTON FIRE STATION 1 L 30 4" X 5" DOWNSPOUT OF DRAIN INVERT 8" CPP = 30314' SUMP INVERT = 302.7B' RIM EL 305.59' INIER IN 3027h nIT itA9 ° SILL EL.: 304.96' .Ra \ s \\\ SILL EL. - 305.2 BUILDING UGHT SEE N \ UNDERGROUND STORAGE " \\ GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS .�`\ ) \ (MAINTAIN 10' SEPARATION FROM EXISTING SEWER) Z \ \ & SPLASH GUARDS SEE DETAIL ON DWG. N0. C-2.1 \� v I.m (BY OTHERS) \ ,. >\ C, SOUTH euaurlcroN 51 MUNICIPAL OFFICES R[ \ UNSTRIPED IMPERVIOUS-: i;; M>E��� PARKINGy,AREA ), CON \ I SAGP 4" X 5" DOWNSPOUT . tJ. I WA1 R LINE NOT ' MARKED IN THIS AREA i �- ,�JSPLALSH GUARD"( II'' s - ' (TYP) n t TE 7, , EXIST. "CBIp4 TO • BE REMOVED GUTTER$ DOWNSPOUTS A \ \\ \\ & SPLASH WARDS WOODED b 'x 1 s t (BY OTHERS) BUILDING LIGHT S \ \ (4 3 1 \ SEE NOTE 12. EDGE OF GRAVEL { SILL TRANSFORMER PAD ,.. EXIST CB#8 TO, I ca. \ a, BE ABANDONED V •`"�A VA VA VA \Y VAS '/ SE 01 PEACE §RLA$H GiIARD k • 0_ ar \ .NEW STORMWATER CATCH BAS \ r S7 UUTURE SEE DETAIL ON DWG. NO. C 2.1` \. \ ASPHALT SURFACE OUT PTON -RAP _ , TECTON . E R ��.S \ \ ID VERT IN 3 4.60 INVERT �•5, ,� INVERT OUT - 259.70' V REGRADE EXISTING \ SWALE •� ' _ .303 g L-s \ TBM p2 303,41 SPIKE IN ROOT OF TRIPLE OAK \ EL. = 304.53• WOOD .t- -� . _... ASPHALT SURFACE -..� TBM p3 7g; BOLT WITH ARROW ° F " POINTING TO IT. 306.95' � Vr METER SOCKET;{„ ". PSOUTH TRANSFORMER PAD • �.� .. � 1. PARCEL BOUNDARY IS FROM A PLAT RECORDED IN THE BUR LAND RECORDS ON DULY 1977 AT SOUTH BLUME VEGETATED SWALE PAGE 74, PROVIDED BY THE CITY. 105,P GE Y. \ TELEC.M 348 � 5' � � � CABINET UNICA ONS� CABINET SITE PLAN FOUND IRON 1.5" 0 FLUSH \ - SCALE: V = 30' 9 ` 2 1. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED AND VERIFY IN THE FIELD THE EXACT LOCATION OF MAINS AND SERVICES TO PREVENT DAMAGE; TO PREVENT LOSS OF SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION; AND TO ASSURE PROPER REPLACEMENT OF SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIG SAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 2. GUTTER INSTALLER TO BE CONTRACTED DIRECTLY BY CITY. 3. DEPTH OF ALL CATCH BASIN SUMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 18". 4. PVC CATCH BASIN STRUCTURES SHALL BE BY NYLOPLAST OR APPROVED EQUAL 5. SNOUTS AS MANUFACTURED BY BEST MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. OF LYME, CT, SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR STRUCTURES 8 (MODEL 24R) AND 10 (MODEL 30R). 6. THE LOCATION OF THE WATER MAIN IS UNKNOWN. GROUND PENETRATING RADAR WAS USED TO TRY TO LOCATE THE WATER MAIN AROUND THE CITY OFFICE COMPLEX, BUT IT WAS UNABLE TO BE LOCATED. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE WATER MAIN BY EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL ABANDON IN PLACE EXISTING STORM DRAINS LOCATED UNDER SIDEWALKS BY CAPPING AND FILLING WITH BLOWN SAND OR FLOWABLE FILL ALL OTHER STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULED TO BE REPLACED SHALL BE REMOVED. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE AND/OR PAVE IN THE VICINITY OF ALL NEW CATCH BASINS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE STRUCTURE GRATE, AS NECESSARY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGRADE SWALE ONTO STATE OF VERMONT PROPERTY AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. OWNER WILL COORDINATE ACCESS WITH VTRANS TO FACILITATE THIS WORK. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXTEND LIMITS OF GRAVEL PARKING AREA TO COMPLETELY COVER UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY. FINAL GRADING SHALL BE APPROPRIATE FOR VEHICLE PARKING. 11. CONTRACTOR IS REFERRED TO LANDSCAPING PLAN AND DETAILS ON DRAWING L-100 AND L-200 FOR LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND PAVING AT CITY OFFICE COMPLEX ENTRANCE LANDSCAPING AT ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE AS NOTED AND/OR AS SPECIFIED UNDER SPECIFICATION SECTION 02900. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL TERMINATE 8" PVC STORM DRAIN ABOVE GRADE W/CAP FOR FUTURE CONNECTON TO DOWNSPOUT. PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURES STRUCTURETYPE STRUCTURE NO. RIM SUMP INLET OUTLET DIAMETER 3 304.98 3_02._23 303.73 8"TO 5D2) PVC 24" REPLACE 2 _ 304.58 _ 301.50 _ s03,22 IS" FROM SD31 M 303.00 (8- TO SD4) PVC 24" REPLACE 03.22 8" 8"FROM SDS) 3 304.88 303.93 - 303.60 (6- TO SD2) CONCRETE - EXISTING 4 304.31 3110,75 302.50 IS" FROM SD2) 302.25 (8" TO SDS) PVC 24" REPLACE 30250 IS" FROM SUI2) 5 304.37 3�.35 30200 (8"FROM SD4) 301.85 IS" TO SDI PVC 24" REPLACE 30200 (8" FROM ROOF 30122 (8"FROM SDS) 6 303.71 299.57 30150+/- 16"FROM SD7) 301.07 ( IS" TO SDS) CONCRETE 48" REPLACE 7 303.95 30D,03 - 301,56 (6" TO SDI PVC - EXISTING 8 303.50 298.67 300.32 :(15"FROM SD9) 300.17 15"TO SW CB CONCRETE 48" REPLACE 303.41 298.93 30058 (15"FROM SDI9 - 30Q43 (15"TO SDB) CONCRETE 48" REPLACE 300.58 (15"FROM SDII 30146 (1S" FROM BID CB) 30 30440 299.82 30146 (6" EAST) 3OL32 (24" TO SW CB) CONCRETE 11, REPLACE 301.77 '.4"NE-CAPPED) _ 11 304.00 299.12 - 300.62 (IS" TO SD9) PVC 30" REPLACE 12 305.00 301.25 - 302.75 (8"TO SD4) PVC 24" NEW 301.20 (24" FROM SD70) SW CB 305.00 298.00 300.00 :(15"FROM SDS) 299.90 (IS" TO SWALE) CONCRETE 72" NEW 300.00 15"FROM STORAGE BIO CB 307.50 301.00 302.75 IS" FROM BIO) 302.50 (35"TO SD30) PVC 3C" NEW ELECTRICAL CABINET Plant Schedule for the City Hall Rioretention Area Scientific Name Common Name Size / Caliper Quantity AR Acer rubrum Red Maple 2 5 -3" 2 CS Corpus Stolonifera Redosier Dogwood 18" 24' High 6 WB Ilex verticillata Winterbeny 18" 24" High 6 LC Lobelia cardinalis Cardinal Flower 6' 12 IV Iris versicolor Blue Fla 6" 12 RE Rudbeckia laciniata Cutleaf Coneflower 6" 12 Code SCALE: 1" - 30' I I I I 0 15 30 60 DRAWING NO. C-1.2 SHEET 4 OF 10 A P Fog W, 'rgi south o. PLANNING & ZONING March 21, 2013 Re: #SP-13-05 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Since 'e , a and J. BAair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 5143 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Paul Conner, AICP, MCIP, Director of Planning & Zoning DATE. February 28, 2013 Site Plan Application 4SP-13-05 City of South Burlington Meeting Date: March 5, 2013 The applicant, City of South Burlington, is seeking Site Plan approval to amend a previously approved plan for a municipal building consisting of City Hall and the Fire Department. The amendment consists of: 1) constructing stormwater system improvements, and 2) after -the - fact approval of the telecommunications tower, 575 Dorset Street. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the followi general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. No changes to principal structures on the site are proposed. Landscaping is proposed to be altered with the addition of a vegetated swale along the southern access drive and replacement of a treed area in the northern section of the property with a vegetated biorentention facility, to improve stormwater management. Staff feels that these criteria has been met by the proposed application. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. No changes to parking are proposed to the front of buildings. Parking that exists to the front of the building is pre-existing. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. No changes are proposed to existing buildings. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. New utilities are proposed to be underground, except for the stormwater vegetated swale and bioretention facility, which are intended to capture water run-off in an above -ground manner. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. No changes are proposed to buildings. Staff feels that the proposed landscape screening and stormwater vegetation will complement existing vegetation on the site. (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant is seeking after -the -fact approval for a telecommunications facility. The facility is located to the rear of the principal structure and includes a fence that is partially screended by vegetation. Treed areas partially screen this facility from properties and public roadsways to the north, south, and west, while the site's principal structure partially screens the facility from Dorset Street. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land maybe required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. A shared access exists between the subject property and property to the south. Staff does not feel additional reservations of land are necessary. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans indicate two dumpsters on the site. The site plan shall be revised to show dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste on the site screened with opaque fencing. 1. The site plan shall be revised to show dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste on the site screened with opaque fencing. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements As there is no building construction proposed for this site, there are no minimum landscaping requirements. The applicant is proposing to replace a treed area on the northern portion of the property with a bioretention facility. Staff feels this provides an enhancement to the property as it improves stormwater management. OTHER STANDARDS: Section 3.12 — Alteration of Existing Grade As the application includes the alteration of more than twenty cubic yards of fill, this application shall also be reviewed under Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the Development Review Board. The Development Review Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested in connection with the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a resource extraction operation. Standards and Conditions for Approval: (1) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for compliance with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). An application under Section 3.12(A) above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or addition of material. The applicant submitted a plan showing the proposed re -grading on the subject property. This plan is sufficient to satisfy this requirement. (2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time. Staff does not feel this requirement is applicable to the subject application. (b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing drainage, and other appropriate measures. The South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent has served as the applicant's principal staff person. Staff feels the plan as submitted meets this standard. (c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure compliance with the provisions of this Section. Staff does not feel this requirement will be necessary for the subject application. (d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under Section 3.07, Height of Structures. The pre -construction height for future development will be the existing grade. Section 3.05 Height of Structures — Telecommunications Facility The applicant is seeking after -the -fact approval for a 90-foot tall telecommunications facility. Pursuant to Section 3.05(D)(2)(a), the DRB may approve a structure with a height in excess of the limitations set forth in Table C-2 for the district. For each foot of additional height, all front and rear setbacks shall be increase by one (1) foot and all side yard setbacks shall be increased by one half (1/2) foot. The height limitation for the Municipal District is 35 feet. The proposed telecommunications facility is 90 feet in height, requiring the following setbacks: • Front: 95' [40' setback plus 55' (1' for each foot additional height above limit)] • Rear: 85' [30' setback plus 55' (1' for each foot additional height above limit)] • Sides: 42.5' [15' setbacks plus 27.5' (1/2' for each foot additional height above limit)] The proposed telecommunications facility meets all of the locational criteria. It is set back 192' from the front property line, 250' from the rear property line, and 185' from the nearest side property line. Section 13.01(1) Handicapped —Accessible Parking Spaces. Parking spaces for handicapped persons shall be provided for all non-residential uses. The proposed site plan shows one (1) such space. There are approximately 79 stripped parking spaces shown on the plan. Pursuant to the regulations, this necessitates a minimum of four (4) handicapped -accessible spaces, unless otherwise determined by ADA Accessibility guidelines. 2. The site plan shall be revised to show the minimum required handicapped - accessible parking spaces. Section 13.07 Exterior Lighting Pursuant to Section 13.07 of the LDRs, all exterior lighting shall be shielded and downcast. The site plan is missing one existing exterior lighting fixture, attached to the building adjacent to the front entry path. 3. The site plan shall be revised to indicate a light fixture attached to the principal building adjacent to the front entry path. OTHER - Plan Notations 4. The Site Plan should be revised to remove the notation of a "sign" near the entry driveway. Signs are regulated by the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. 5. The Site Plan should be revised to indicate the "Gravel surface" to the rear of the principal building as an "unstriped impervious parking area" 6. The Site Plan should be revised to remove a rectangular box in the center of the striped parking area to the north of the principal building. 1 south -,('r PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-- (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑ Administrative development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailingaddress, phone and fax ft C i l v or ? Suvt � p Jt'Ai4fi^ , S75 _ 'ev:I sk"O. -�u1� drliAd �3'1 V7 yu I 1 �6-2)6-5- �--711G� 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): ((�� jj 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax ft C! 1u 6Ji 0 575 Darxf S f IX Rvr11'Adf,,AV7 0 v/' 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax ft Ti, D; ; Id a - Avg,► (n02 6 5'8 --796 1 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: C�i �' }�v ®S urf. C01-) 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: �) / 5' Doffef Street 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0,570 _ 6Q 575 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Coofrvc � SE6fmw3fer lfed�Mm prAd;cef. b. Existing ses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on uses to remain): _ (include description and size of each new use and existing d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Gv , // nil f Chive e e. Height of building & number of floors (pro osed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): a C�iZ f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): N 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 235,g lq Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing q,y7 % / 23� 5()� sq. ft. Proposed 1,17 % / 23115 Uy sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing qy.3 %/ 10q 29 sq. ft. Proposed q 4, q % / 0 S. Ala L2 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 17 50 0 J * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): �22_0,db - S w f a el- ;Mn rpve✓Iel `f 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC I f a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): (�l 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: I� 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Novel e( A, ZUi 3 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 9T- D 7/M � /q //) Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. S GNATURE OF APPLICANT R �' S�Z— SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have review this site plan application and find it to be: [� Complete ❑ I mplet t / krr- Administrativ Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of February, 2013, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Site Plan #SP-12-53, was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: PIN Property Owner 0570-00435 RAFAEL F VEVE JR 0570-00595 595 DORSET LLC Vtrans VT Agency of Transportation D570-00550 SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 0570-00595 Sperry Holdings LLC 0570-00595 Cooper Holdings LLC 0570-00595 VT Inspection Services 0570-00595 Richard M Doherty 0570-00595 Catherine Handy Trust Address P 0 BOX 2361 595 DORSET ST #2 PO Box 168 550 DORSET ST 595 Dorset St, #1 595 Dorset St, #3 595 Dorset St 595 Dorset St, #6 595 Dorset St, #10 CSC SOUTH BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON Essex Junction SOUTH BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON State Zip VT 05407 VT 05403 VT 05446 VT 05403 VT 05403 VT 05403 VT 05403 VT 05403 VT 05403 � GPI t. , 40) , Dated at '[town/city], Vermont, this day of F� ri Printed Name: Phone number and email: r 2�L,, "i r , (� Signature: Date: Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. I-71� 1 Page 1 of 1 C ray From: Craig Lambert Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 7:42 AM To: ray Subject: City Office Stormwater Improvements Ray, I looked over the plans for the City Office bioretention area. Planting Details and Specs should be included but otherwise they look fine Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clambert(a-)sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. 2/15/2013 OWNER DATE OF TRANSFER SALE PRICE VOL PAGE ti ,rJ o �o �- �� -5a SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY OFFICE STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 575 DORSET STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 HOYLE, TANNER & ASSOCIATES, INC 125 COLLEGE STREET, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 DIBERNARDO ASSOCIATES, LCC 440 ROCKINGHAM ROAD, BELLOWS FALLS, VERMONT 05101 JANUARY 2013 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR REVIEW ONLY RECEIVED FEB 0 7 2013 City of So. Burlington r w w r N r w ch K O PROJECT LOCATION KENNEDY DRIVE LOCUS PLAN NOT TO SCALE ENGINEER GENERAL NOTES: LEGEND: DRAWING INDEX 1. THESE GENERAL NOTES SHALL APPLY TO ALL DRAWINGS IN THIS CONTRACT AND TO THE WORK THEY CONVEY. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DMFT 2. THE LOCATION OF UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DRAWING SHEET ---------SD----- -- STIX2M SEWER LINT COORDINATING WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED AND VERIFY IN THE FIELD THE EXACT LOCATION OF MAINS AND SERVICES NUMBER NUMBER TITLE TO PREVENT DAMAGE; LOSS OF SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION; AND FOR REPLACEMENT OF SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ' ° WATER LNE NOTIFY "DIG SAFE" PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES BY EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION s S SEWER LINE o METHOD. PAYMENT FOR EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION IS INCLUDED IN THE TEST PIT BID ITEM. ELEC INICAL LINE GENERAL PLANS a -- --- -- - - - 3. LOCATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING AND OTHER ITEMS AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM CAS IINE i TITLE SHEET AS -BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. LOCATION OF THESE ITEMS SHALL BE-ELEPHONE LINE GPOA 2 GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND AND DRAWING INDEX CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DIG TEST PITS AS REQUIRED TO VERIFY LOCATIONS, THERE MAY BE OTHER BELOW GRADE STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN WHICH WILL REQUIRE DEMOLITION AND/OR RELOCATING IN ORDER TO COMPLETE ---- - —COMMUNICATIONS LINE CIVIL PLANS THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT. THEREFORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF n CONCRETE BOUND FOUNO ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND OTHER FEATURES AFFECTING THE WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL BE DONE D IRON PIN FounO - AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CONTRACT. F7.1 a OUSTING arEPLAN j DEclDuous INEE 01.2 4 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES. PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CONIFEROUS TREED-2. a STORAGE PLAN AND DETAILS PROJECT AS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. PAYMENT FOR RELOCATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER cal s EIDRETENTGN PLAN AND SECTION ITEMS IS INCLUDED IN SITE PREP AND RESTORATION BID ITEM. THERE SHALL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR RELOCATION OF `— C—E LINK FENCE C14.1 T SWALE PLAN AM SECTION EXISTING STRUCTURES. PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS.n, UTILITY POLE C-S.1 S MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 0 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING ALL ARRANGEMENTS FOR ANCHORING, SUPPORTING AND/OR RELOCATING TEST "I _ AND PROTECTING ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL COSTS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICES BID. IN THE CASE • BOLLARD OF DAMAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF ALL REPAIRS. CURB d_ 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF THE EXISTING FEATURES AND STRUCTURES WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE c"I WATER LINE GA-E VALVE z ro WORK. IN THE CASE OF DAMAGE. THE REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AS ... FIRE HYDRANT U Do z APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 0 SEWER MANHOLE a o _ 7. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES. REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS. THE MORE STRINGENT ❑ LAICH HASM a SHALL APPLY. MONITORING WELL FIEVATONS TO TOP OF PIPE s 8. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE rD ELECTRICAL MANHOLE ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. r) TELEPHONE MANHOLE 9. THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. CARE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES SICNINgm� DURING CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS REGARDING SITE SAFETY SHALL SOLELY BE THE 11 LGnT POLE 06Y 2:ugg m CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. ull.J-�f1l-vV.1/ TREE NNE SW�3io�'�a�� z o 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL WASTE BUILDING MATERIAL, CONCRETE, MASONRY, TREES, SHRUBS, DEBRIS,��'g�isoG` �<ia EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND OTHER MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT WORK AND AS REQUIRED BY THE OWNER. CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH VERMONT LAW. a'H 4 6..-EED ALL TREE STUMPS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED OFFSITE LOCATION ACCOMPANIED BY A STATE ISSUED INSIGNIFICANT o ?: S WASTE MANAGEMENT EVENT APPROVAL. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS o o INCLUDING HAULING SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR. as STOCKPILED MATERIAL NOTES: 5 11. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR DETERMINED NOT TO BE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT, OR DETERMINED TO BE EXCESSIVE DISTURBANCE OF THE AREA FOR THE PROPOSED WORK SHALL BE RESTORED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 1. ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED PRIOR TO 12. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER/OWNER AND THE VERMONT STORMWATER INCLEMENT WEATHER, GRADED TO SHED WATER, AND COVERED AT THE END OF EACH WORKDAY WITH A ,- MANAGEMENT MANUAL, VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, LATEST EDITION. MINIMUM OF 20-MIL BLACK POLYETHYLENE. THE C o s x 13. ALL DRAINAGE OUTLETS SHALL BE LOCATED AND APPROPRIATE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES COVER SHALL BE WEIGHTED AND WILL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE STOCKPILE PERIOD. C INSTALLED AS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL DEWATERING AND OPERATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPROPRIATE a o sC AGENCY REGULATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REQUIRED DISCHARGE SAMPLING AND TESTING AND SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE DEWATERING OPERATIONS. 2. STOCKPILE AREAS WILL BE GRADED SUCH THAT _ �P a STORMWATER IS DIVERTED FROM STOCKPILED L_ 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL, ALL BUOYANCY CALCULATIONS FOR MATERIALS. SILT FENCE WILL SURROUND ALL STOCKPILES. SLOPES ON STOCKPILES SHALL NOT BE u w o n 0 4 UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE NEED AND SIZE OF CONCRETE ANCHOR SLABS STEEPER THAN 1:1. 6 �' TO PREVENT FLOATATION AND PROVIDE APPROVED CONCRETE ANCHOR SLABS IF REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN AND PROVIDE THE REINFORCING STEEL REQUIRED IN CONCRETE ANCHOR SLABS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN THE STRUCTURAL CONNECTION BETWEEN STRUCTURES AND CONCRETE ANCHOR SLABS TO PREVENT FLOATATION. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE k STAMPED BY A VERMONT REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR REVIEW. 15. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION DATED 2011, AND ITS LATEST REVISIONS, AND THE AASHTO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES, DATED 1996, AND 2002 INTERIM FOR HS25 LOADING. 16. ALL STORMWATER TREATMENT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES ARE REFERENCED FROM THE VERMONT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL, VOLUME I-STORMWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS, BY THE VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, DATED APRIL Z 2002. i kSs Lu X W 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. J Z 18. CONTRACTOR TO USE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION DETAILS IF CONSTRUCTION DETAIL IS NOT SPECIFIED. z Uj Ur W Z m O Z � N J Q O 0 W U Z Q Lu DRAWING NO. G-0.1 SHEET 2 OF 8 i CONTROL .wP °Y ii¢n Psu TRIP PaWnl�w� 9rM [ � rM1.IpIlY PM C � ,.usrprYl srw i - il.a'00`d.m frM ]W.�Y•pM M �t t"slE.l-1 � vai.•8] I sus s57 "]opir® II k xw' p i m t s ." sEwa up w n, s wu = — oEpouars rlpE ® '1 rY�rm urt vxtt m tus cu ".""aF wt ENGIN-ER DRAFT g u m n x WIN � x 8 3 is 56=k9 €gS z V VTR 8< CU cg. _CU 5QN� W U r N 4 9 L1J 03 f— �y Z_ N8 oLL X W U DR=YANG NO. 4 C 1.1 SCALE:] o 20 0 8o sHEEr 3 OF 8 LOCATION OF WATER LINE AS SHOWN ON 97 PLANS PRODUCED BY ME CITY. LINE APPRDX. 10 FEET FROM SEWER AND 5 FEET DEEP. MANHOLE WAS BACKED UP. UNABLE TO OBTAIN INVERT. UNDERGROUND STORAGE (MAINTAIN 10' SEPARATION FROM EXISTING SEWER) SEE DETAIL ON DWG. NO. C-2.1 BIORETENTION FACILITY (APPROX 1600 SF.) SEE DETAIL ON DWG NO. C-11 FOUND IRON ROD r Up `301/ i 1 V•I YY I III`R "1 WOODED I SHE I SLED / I I I I � S 1 ` GRA L SURFACE \ \ 1 WIXXIED r-LEDGE OF GRAVEL z' 1 NEW 3ORMWATER CATCH B � NO. SEE DETAIL ON DWG NO. / / 3CI.53 r / / 14'L 1 m \A 1 304 REGRADE EXISTING SWALE TRANSFORMER PAD OUNO IRON ROD TELECOMMIL CATIOrvS - 1.5. 0 FLUSH CABINET NW 1 I \ � 309]I 3@- ^••.. �"' '�" o LIMITS OF BID ALTERNATES-~ 8-3 3, B-4 3t0.a4M BUS STOP ••' \ 1 MW 6 1 NI ti L1 ci I 1 11 uASPHALT SURFACE \ n PILOT CHANNEL pB/ /RECHARGE STATIO! jTO y / 'ROOF / p I ORNN' SILL EL.. 2502.21' I I A/C um I .• B ,i \ HOLONC TAN BSTION \ 1 COVERS FIRE Iy�L II -- EL. L- SILL - ]00.86' I 1 WATER LINE NOT 1. THIS 4' X 5' DOWNSPOUT AREA ROOF DRAIN (TYP') \ ` S'' \ NVERTJ 8• CPP - 303.14' SUMP INVERT 302.78' I SC ANSFORMER PAD RIM 0.. - J03.59 AGi i\\� 1. SILL EL. - 304.96' J ! \ I I 7 SILL EL. = 305.28'J GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS & SPLASH GUARDS ^ r . • . R • s0 I I (BY OTHERS) I •.. yIL .• scN A PLANT 1 .� SOUTH BURLINGTON • • • 30S 0 MAILBOX' 1 tf MUNICIPAL OFFICES l(1 4' X S' DOWNSPOUT \ \ 1 1 (TYP.) _ _ypsW s.• �ti LIMITS OF BID AL`TRNATES L SLL EL. - }p5.18' �T- III h B-2 GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS / \ W & SPLASH GUARDS 8' PVC \ \ \ (BY OTHERS) s \ 1 TRANSFORMER PAO� II T r�-r.. IrII 1\` REPLACE .y \ ��ST ` \\ SO VAIN 0 Pvc I \u fo , I I ASPHALT SURFACE T- S OR r I T6ET PROTECT5 �� I R -RAP-*W S \ ASPHALT SURFACE \ I ® RW EL. - 10A80 \ 7 INVERT IN - 289,80' INVERT OR - 289.70' ear WIN ARROW � ' ® 308 95' �SfA-E1 2 2 1 /2 CE IN ROOT ld TRIPLE OAK WOOD -' Ic C METER SOCKET TRANSFORMER PAD • E ELEC11tICAL CABINET VEGETATED SWALE -COMMUNICATION I SITE PLAN CABINET FOUND IRON ROD 1.5' 0 FLUSH SCALE: I' - 30' NOTES: 1. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED AND VERIFY IN THE FIELD THE EXACT LOCATION OF MAINS AND SERVICES TO PREVENT DAMAGE; TO PREVENT LOSS OF SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION; AND TO ASSURE PROPER REPLACEMENT OF SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIG SAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 2. GUTTER INSTALLER TO BE CONTRACTED DIRECTLY BY CITY. 3. DEPTH OF ALL CATCH BASIN SUMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 18'. 4. PVC CATCH BASIN STRUCTURES SHALL BE BY NYLOPLAST OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. SNOUTS AS MANUFACTURED BY BEST MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. OF LYME. CT, SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR STRUCTURES 8 (MODEL 24R) AND 10 (MODEL 30R). 6. THE LOCATION OF THE WATER MAIN IS UNKNOWN. GROUND PENETRATING RADAR WAS USED TO TRY TO LOCATE THE WATER MAIN AROUND THE CITY OFFICE COMPLEX, BUT IT WAS UNABLE TO BE LOCATED. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE WATER MAIN BY EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL ABANDON IN PLACE STORM DRAIN LOCATED UNDER SIDEWALK BY CAPPING AND FILLING WITH BLOWN SAND OR FLOWABLE FILL ALL OTHER STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULED TO BE REPLACED SHALL BE REMOVED. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE AND/OR PAVE IN THE VICINITY OF ALL NEW CATCH BASINS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE STRUCTURE GRATE, AS NECESSARY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGRADE SWALE ONTO STATE OF VERMONT PROPERTY AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OWNER WILL COORDINATE ACCESS WITH VTRANS TO FACILITATE THIS WORK. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXTEND LIMITS OF GRAVEL PARKING AREA TO COMPLETELY COVER UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY. FINAL GRADING SHALL BE APPROPRIATE FOR VEHICLE PARKING PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURES STRUCTURENO. RIM INLET Dunn STRUC RE DIAMETER 1 306.96 303.77 PVC - EXISTING 2 3OLM 30122 308.14 PVC - EXISTING 3 310LBS - 303.6D PVC - EXISTING 4 304.31 302.82 3DL66 PVC 74• REPLACE 5 3X37 3OL99 3DL84 PVC 2A• REPLACE B 303.n 3DL22 30L07 CONCRETE 48' REPLACE 7 303.95 - 1 301.56 PVC - EXISTING 8 30150 3OD.29 30114 CONCRETE�L4rfl,, EPLACE 9 303.40 300.55 300.40 CONCRETEEPLACE 7D 30440 307.46301.32 CONCRETEPLACE 11 304.00 30074 300.59 PVCA'PLACE 12 305.00 303.01 PVC 2A' I REPLACE ENGINEER DRAFT ORAMNG N0. C-1.2 SCALE: 1• - 30' a 15 30 80 sHELT 4 of 8 l I NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PIPE AND ALL APPURTENANT STRUCTURES PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN THE VICINITY OF THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY HAS BEEN PERIODICALLY MONITORED FROM JULY 2012 THROUGH JANUARY 2013. OBSERVED GROUNDWATER ELEVATION HAVE RANGED BETWEEN APPROX. 297.1' TO 300.2'. 3. ISOLATOR ROW SHALL BE COMPLETELY WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC (AASHTO M288 CLASS 2 NON -WOVEN). A nNy AS YAHUFACTURED DY UDWT RISER FOR PLAFIEMENi OF N ri0PU5T s APPROVED EWK [MLO FRAME AT F R P TRADE EIFVARa1 N0, A BARS AT 11' CASs IN PLACE CatgtElE CIXWt STIRRUPS (SHRINNAI OR PRECAST RING RISER SLEEK ! YIMWY RERWDR 6" X 1/2" HOPE ISOLATOR 2*-4 1/2" ROW DIVERSION BAFFLE, -10 3/4•-I—V-5 3/4" SEAM WELDED TO HOPE f A-1 PIPE INTERIOR 15" STUB 7 3/4• O INVERT 0 MDR /4" 1 1/2" O.D. 18• I.D. 1/4 21 1/Y O. 12 I R 1'-11 3/4 B 16• I.D. �7B L 21I.D. O.D. A J 'OP VIEW f 12' RISER 5' SUB0 INKRT (NIODINI� BA.Fl UNDER Ca1M `E—FCLL MARKCT CWRACTED PER ASp 21 DPE RISER BORROM (DIAMETER ! HDa1T —I Notes: 2. UNU. i— JPMt 11-10 F« RYw Slr Ih. Matwld %01 M RIpM/S.RI Er,wph To AwM b/mnalYn Wrn Cmcr t+ Pf c AgaFw IRA s1..... Tn. SIr.. M11 PE FITTING "C" `4 Fwm.p a AmwHg i. MPE Canty lM+ "F«Z At, - - DETAIL +««."b'gR Mr a TM L... r. 1n. HppE RN (1) REQUIRED RISER ELEVATION DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 2'-10 1/2" 20'-0• 9'-10 112• Rl° ROW WRAPEXTILE TOR `12• �20'-O' WITH GEOTEXD ROW 2'-4 1/2" 1 ISOLATOR ROW r I DVERSON B BAFFLE AS , 9iDCN 8'-10 3/4• DETAIL TAIL t i B 8'-10 3/1• I B 1 8'-10 3/4• 7 2'-A +/z• I 12" RISER ,'-2• SPACING (TYPICA s5-7 x 1 BILL OF MATERIALS M"'( DESCRIPTION NO. REQUIRED A 18" Elbo. 0 B 18• Trlpl. TN 8 C IS' Elbe. .ith 12' RI,w ! 15• Stub I D 18' Elbm with 12' 111— 3 1 18" Pip. (20'-0• Lang) 22 2 18• Pip. (9'-101• Long) II 18' Wrap Around CAupl«+ 30 12" -10 1/2' 5• STUB ISOLATOR ROW DIVERSION BAFFLE AS 2'-10 1 910WJ ON DETAIL 31'-5• 2'-4 1/2• gig -ALL 15' HOPE PIPE IS NLLr PERFORATED. Ll TTTE PIPE. -ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NMINAL (UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED) -ONE D RTTING WTH ISOLATOR ROW OIKRSON BAFR£. C FITTING WIN ISOLATOR FOR DIVERSION BLARE. UNDERGROUND STORAGE PLAN SCALE: NOT TO SCALE SFCTION B—B FITTING C" DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE A7 SECTION A —A 2'-3 1/2' IB• L0. 21 1/2" O.D. _ RISER 5" STUB IO INKRT 2'-4 1/2' f 8 I.D. 2t 1/2" O.D. B I.D. 21 1/2" O.O. LC L T 7 ' I 1 -5 3/4 H IB• LD. ,_ . JB SFCTION A —A L 21 1/2 O.D. J TOP VIEW A FITTING "A" 1-1-11 3/4--I DETAIL SECTION B—B -(2) REQUIRED- FITT/NG -A -DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE BELOW DIMENSIONS IN FEET f .c 1 2.79' 0.948' IS- CORRUGATED HOPE BEDDING DETAIL ENGINEER DRAFT SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 22" COMPACT BACKFILL MATERIAL 12• RISER f EL 304.00 GEOGRID MATERIAL EL 302.15 d 40%DWASHED, OPEN z ry GRA 6" STONE GRADEED.. ANGULAR AGGREGATE u w a Lj SHALL BE WRAPPED IN 40% VOID RATIO GEOTEXTITLE FABRIC. a0 z 18" I.D. 15" STUB < i EL. 300.00 6" STONE 40% VOID RATIO 12ggbp 8�5'" �qqjj �� m N BB1YY!! gzE €8 EL. 299.35 401G POROSITY WASHED. OPEN NOTE: GRADED, ANGULAR AGGREGATE SHALL BE WRAPPED IN pOS < 40% POROSITY FOR WASHED. OPEN GRADED, GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. ANGULAR AGGREGATE.Ai&ig qUU ELEVATION VIEW DETAIL a 3 -g SCALE: NOT TO SCALE a In 55= 50 s o C m' 9. 24" HOPE FROM BIORETENTION FACILITY /IV MI INV. IN. 301.20 _ Nc Is a TV V��s {" OFFSET FROM i CENTER OF MH , UO m� � 6'-0" I.D. DIA. MANHOLE A \ N Y/ Vl 15" HOPE TO/FR GE UNDERGROUND STORAGE can Ian INV. IN 300.00 15" HOPE FROM CB NO. 8 INV. IN 300.00 \ o U m 18" HOPE INV. OUT = 299.90 N 11" (TYP.) O Z X 38" ALUMINUM HATCH AS < J g36" MANUFACTURED NY BILCO OF NEW . 8 a Q HAVEN, CT. OR APPROVED EOUAL RIM EL 305.00 LLI I— OF W MAX EL 303.50 OF FINISHED GRADE m 0 EL 302.83 0 p Z EL 101.8.7 F Q ALUMINUM RAILS rL EL 299.90 6" CONCRETE EL 298.00 5 PVC STOPLOGS O 5• WIDE EA 1. ORIFICE DRAWING NO. C-2.1 UNDERGROUND STORMWATER STORAGE INLETIOUTLET DETAIL 5 8 SCALE: 3/8" - 1'-0" SHEET OF NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING ALL ARRANGEMENTS 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER FOR ANCHORING, SUPPORTING AND/OR RELOCATING AND PROTECTING ALL ITEMS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT AS SHOWN ON UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL COSTS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. PAYMENT FOR RELOCATION OF EXISTING PRICES BID. IN THE CASE OF DAMAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS IS INCLUDED IN PIPE AND STRUCTURE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF ALL REPAIRS. BID ITEMS. THERE SHALL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR RELOCATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS. 2. STORM DRAINS CROSSING EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH FULL STORM DRAIN PIPE LENGTHS CENTERED ON THE POINT 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PLANTS WITHIN THE OF CROSSING. BIORETENTION FACILITY AS INDICATED IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE (SPECIFICATION 02920) AND AS LOCATED IN THE FIELD. 3. THE MAIN COLLECTOR PIPE FOR UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.005 FT/FT 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL PILOT CHANNEL TO ADEQUATELY CONVEY STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM WEST EDGE OF EXISTING 4. UNDERDRAINS SHALL BE PLACED ON 3'-0" WIDE SECTION OF FILTER FABRIC. PARKING AREA TO BIORETENTION FACILITY. 5. CATCH BASIN SHALL BE PVC, BY NYLOPLAST OR APPROVED EQUAL, 30" DIAMETER WITH SCREW CAP ON END OF 6" INLET PIPE. PROPOSED 7GRADE VT SPEC. ITEM N0. 649.31 — Nu. I-D. 6" SOLID SCH. 40 PVC PIPE HOPE UNDERDRAIN OUTLET PILOT CHANNEL DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE ITEM NO. 649.31, GEOTEXTILE 1/4"0 HOLES Q<, (TYP.) VO PERFORATED PIPE DETAIL SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 6" PERFORATED SCH. 40 PVC- '✓ PIPE (TYP.) i SEE DETAIL I - THIS SHEET. 10' (TYP.) — SIORETENTION UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM DETAIL SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0" ONDING DEPTH = 6" 3' OF MULCH OUTLET STRUCTURE (RIM ELEV. 307.50) 6" PVC OBSERVATION TOP OF BERM ELEV. 308.00 ENGINEER DRAFT - FLEV ELEV. 307.00 �110 II IIIIIII II' III III II II Il 111 li tt tA TING MEDIA 3J" ' I I-1 I= I I � ;' D• I I I I= I � w = MIN. k -IEL V. 304.25 w z J __ - -� - ........................................... ••i I — 7 .. �... __ ...........................19I ELEV. 303.50 — �F --II FILTER FABRIC GRAVEL CURTAIN DRAIN - li E FO D FOR OVERFLOW PE' m (1/4" - 3/4" STONE) APPROXIMATE SEASONAL = $affW y HIGH WATER TABLE �Cit< fi i ELEV. 302.5 gjm;>' l —1I —III '-- F8€zaz��8 UNDISTURBED SUBGR ADE F 6,, ! - BIORETENTION FACILITY SECTION SCALE: NOT TO SCALE z o �xN TRANSFORMER PAD FOUND IRON ROD rn L - TELECOMMUNICATIONS� 1.5o RUSH CABINET L U m < a _ -- Y......"" CU As FOUND IRON ROD G "---_if II 1 I 3W 5. �0. • $ ^ O 7' PUP 0.5' ;�1� ` ® O UV1 �x PLANTING SCHEDULE PER .P� - ' - LIMITS OF BID ALTERNATES _TA B2 Q A /A��1 O m „ N o SPECIFlCAMON 02920 B-3 & B-4 MW a BUS STOP 6" PVC OBSERVATION 31 D.3a•a� y `` to '^ WELL/CLEANOUr 501' \ S MW 6 N 0 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM2N 5' wO DED PVC CATCH BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURE. (RIM ELEV. 307.50) SEE DETAIL ON DWG NO. C-5.1 15" HDPE INVERT OUT = 303.45 S-0.006 SHED 6" OBSERVATION WELL/CLEANOUT SHED ASPHALT SURFACE i ------------------------- XI D PILOT CHANNEL ,RECHARGE STATION 310 -' - RODF DRAIN III r• PLATFORM ..M" SILL n. - 309.71' � A/C UNIT HOLDING TAN SOUTH BURLINGTON COKRS FIRE STATION 1T SILL a. .� WAT�N NINE NOT MA—C IN THIS ` I I `• I • AREAR' 1 F/ ANSFORMER PAO EL PLAN SCALE: I' - 30' ORAN ERT B' CPP - 303.14 IF INVERT - 302.78' RW1 E 30' IN•.FRT In IT y 0 W o z o �a d z o zz O z ~ U ?y LU m z Cn W oyy z OU Q >� O BOLTWITHARROW ~ O m POINTING TO IT. y ELEV. - 31D.71' F O IELECONMUNICATO CABINET DRAWING NO. �I u O C 3.1 SCALE: I" - 3W SHEET 6 OF 8 I I I I 0 15 30 60 NOTES, 1. THE GRASS CHANNEL SITE SLOPE SHALL BE 4.0% OR LESS. 2. THE GRASS CHANNEL LOCATIONS SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON DWG. NO. C-1.2 SLOPE FINISH GRADE 1 WOODED L� EDGE OF GRAVEL \ • l�\ 02 a _ ` • `, �. 1 ICY• �� `` .•\. \ OUTLET kOTECTION \Y TYPE II ST(*E RIP -RAP 29 91 15 ----303 J� O^ ------------- __ ^0---3p2� ^' \\ RE�ADE EXISTING,,-� O - 90 --' _ - 304 -= d � 1"• GRASS SWALE SECTION DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 4' X 5' DOWNSPOUT WITH SLASH GUARD 3 p9 (TYP.) 70 8 Jp) , SILL EL. = 305.03'- S1',1 —TRANSFORMER PADO1'� 1 �304- Lu EL ASPHALT SURFACE `. �`•� - z `. RIM EL. -= 304.60//' INVERT IN = 289.80' INVERT OUT = 289.70' --305- ' OFF PA SWALE V OFF PAVEMENT 5, ST kL #_�- r SWALE 2' OFF PAVEMENT (E IN ROOT TRIPLE OAK 304,53' WOODED VEGETATED SWALE PLAN SCALE: I' - 21Y ENGINEER DRAFT NOTES: 1. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS APPROXIMATE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED AND VERIFY IN THE FIELD THE EXACT LOCATION OF MAINS AND SERVICES TO PREVENT DAMAGE; TO PREVENT LOSS OF SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION; AND TO ASSURE PROPER REPLACEMENT OF SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIG SAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 2. GUTTER INSTALLER TO BE CONTRACTED DIRECTLY BY CITY. 3. DEPTH OF ALL CATCH BASIN SUMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 18'. 4. PVC CATCH BASIN STRUCTURES SHALL BE BY NYLOPLAST OR APPROVED EOUAL. b S. SNOUTS AS MANUFACTURED BY BEST MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS. INC. OF LYME, CT, SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR STRUCTURES 8 (MODEL 24R) AND 10 (MODEL 30R). H 6. THE LOCATION OF THE WATER MAIN IS UNKNOWN. GROUND PENETRATING RADAR WAS USED TO TRY TO LOCATE THE WATER MAIN AROUND THE CITY OFFICE COMPLEX, BUT IT WAS UNABLE TO BE LOCATED. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE WATER MAIN BY EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL ABANDON IN PLACE STORM DRAIN LOCATED UNDER SIDEWALK BY CAPPING AND FILLING WITH BLOWN SAND OR FLOWABLE FILL ALL OTHER STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULED TO BE REPLACED SHALL BE REMOVED. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE AND/OR PAVE IN THE VICINITY OF ALL NEW CATCH BASINS TO o PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE STRUCTURE GRATE, AS NECESSARY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGRADE SWALE ONTO STATE OF VERMONT PROPERTY AS NEEDED TO m i PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. OWNER HILL COORDINATE ACCESS WITH VTRANS TO FACILITATE THIS WORK. M 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXTEND LIMITS OF GRAVEL PARKING AREA TO COMPLETELY COVER r UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY. FINAL GRADING SHALL BE APPROPRIATE FOR VEHICLE x PARKING �Ia W � 8, ggqCqqq� y&Z yl`ly= El U as CgPal _ d � --. u • . - ---------------- �1 ASPHALT SURFACE ;R o TBM $3 BOLT WITH ARROW i< Z Z POINTING TO IT. i Q EL. = 306.95' STA H1 t m LLI LLI U r0 ,Jpy U (43 � Q \ rc METER SOCKET / \ DRAWING NO, TRANSFORMER PAD `—'— 1 _-4 . I SCALE: 1' — 20' VVV I I I I 0 10 20 so SHEET 7 OF 8 IL CATCH BASIN CRATE ADJUST TO GRADE WITH RCAST CONCRETE RINGS (SHOWN) OR INFRA -RISER' AS REO'D. (12' MAX.) 18' qA B' H-20 TOP SLAB$�8 N.T.S. 24' DMA_ CLEAR OPENING i u �� rc RISER SECTION V-4, REFER TO DETAIL A 5" - 41i DIA. YIN. ~- HOLE CUT TO RAN SUMP MIN. SEE PIPE CONNECTION TONGUE & GROOVE DETAILS THIS SHEET JOINT DETAIL N.T.S. I' BEDDING ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE CONCRETE CLASS A . (4.000 PS). CIRCUMFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE Q12 SO. IN. PER LF. IN ALL SECTIONS AND SHALL BE PLACED IN THE CENTER THIRD OF THE WALL THE TONGUE OR GROOVE OF THE JOINT SHALL CONTAIN ONE LINE OF CIRCUMFIMTIAL RENFORCEMENT EQUAL TO 0.12 SO. IN. PER LF. RISERS OF 1'-4' MAY BE USED TO REACH THE DESRED ELEVATION. STEPS ARE NOT ALLOWED. • CATCH BASIN GRATE SHALL BE 24' SQUARE HEAVY DUTY, WITH 2' SQUARE OPENING PATTERN. PRE -CAST REINFORCED CONCRETE CATCH BASIN & DROP INLET DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE r s.zs• 1.75" T— 0 o 00 0 038- 031.87 DIMENSIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY ACI M- DIMENSIONS MAY VARY, DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES GRATE MEETS H-20 LOAD RATING QUALITY: MATERAS SHALL CCNFOII TO ASTM A535 GRADE 70-50-05 PAINT: CASTINGS ARE FURNISHED WITH A BACK PAINT LOCKING DEVICE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST PVC CATCH BASIN DUCTILE IRON FRAME AND GRATE DETAIL RUBBER-UKE GASKET ASPHALT IMPREGNATED ROLLS OUT Di ftECE55 POLYURETHANE GASKET 1 1/2• X 2' RUBBER-UKE APPROVED PREFORMED O-RING SET i BITUMASTIC SEALANT -- IN RECESS SEE NOTE 3 POLY717E ROLL-N-LOK BITUMASTIC O-RING (OR EQUAL) (OR EQUAL) NOTE ALL GASKETS AND SEALANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS DETAIL -A SCALE: NOT TO SCAT NOTES: 1. HORIZONTAL JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONS OF PRECAST CONCRETE BARRELS SHALL BE OF A TYPE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, WHICH TYPE SHALL IN GENERAL, DEPEND FOR WATERTIGHTNESS INSIDE FACE UPON AN ELASTOMERIC OR MASTIC-UKE OF MANHOLE Ll GASKET. FILL WITH 2. PIPE TO MANHOLE JOINTS SHALL DE "TAR- ONLY AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND IN GENERAL WILL DEPEND FOR PIPE WATERTIGHTNESS UPON ELASTOMEJBC SEALANT. ] FOR 81 TYPE JOINTS THE AOR NT OFS EA a• SEALANT SHALL DESUFFICIENT TO FILL AT LEAST 75% OFTHE �RU JOINT CAVITY. - FLEXIBLE SLEEVE (1, 2) INTEGRATED DUCTILE ON FRAME &GRATE TO �\ LOCK -JOINT FLEXIBLE MANHOLE SLEEVE (OR EQUAL) MATCH BASIN O.D. / `� 18" MIN WIDTH GUIDEUNE MIN THICKNESS GUIDELINE MINIMUM PIPE BURIAL DEPTH PER PIPE MANUFACTURER TRAFFIC LOADS: CONOIETENSLAB DIMENSIONS ARE FOR (AIOELINE PURPOSES C .Y ACTUAL CONCRETE SLAB MUST BE RECOMMENDATICN DESIGNED TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION LOCAL SOIL COIDITICNS, . MANUFACING RSUMP) TRAFFIC LOADING & OTHER APPLICABLE DESIGN FACTORS RE(MI ME MIT ,, (5) ADAPTER ANGLES THE BAOOILL MATERIAL SMALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHER (3) VARIABLE VARIABLE. 0' - INVERT HEIGHTS 380' �0t` It GRAIAAAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF OASIS N MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321. BEDDING & BACIOTLL AVAILABLE (ACCORDING PLANSITAKE TO ACCORDING l0 OFF) PLANS FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SMALL BE PLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACOCI DNCE WITH ASTM D2321. (3) VARIABLE SUMP DEPTH ACCORDING TO PLANS (10' MIN. BASED ON (4) VARIOUS TYPES OF INLET & OUTLET MANUFACTURING REO.) ADAPTERS AVAILABLE: 4'-30" FOR CORRUGATED HOPE (ADS N-12/HANCOR ����' DUAL WALL, ADS/HANCOR SINGLE WALL)8" MIN N-12 HP, PVC SEWER (EX: SDR 35), PVC DWV (EX: SCH 40), PVC C900/C905, CORRUGATED & RIBBED PVC WATERTIGHT JOINT (CORRUGATED HOPE SHOWN)?' NOTES 1. GRATES/SOUD COVER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM AS38 GRADE 70-50-05. 2. FRAMES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05 3. DRAIN BASIN TO BE CUSTOM MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAILS. RISERS ARE NEEDED FOR BASINS OVER 84" DUE TO SHIPPING RESTRICTIONS. 4. DRAINAGE CONNECTION STUB JOINT TIGHTNESS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM 03212 FOR CORRUGATED HOPE (ADS N-I2/HANCOR DUAL WALL), N-12 HP, & PVC SEWER (4"-24"). 5. ADAPTERS CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE 0' TO 380'. TO DETERMINE MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS PVC CATCH BASIN DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE KOR-NSEAL JOINT SLEEVE ORE AL ENGINEER DRAFT O U � N U a a o � a qbg ggp E. 3 � VH—Ao o i IM €3bi 5 `o I o {y Cgo,AI � C Gv a �, C W 00 Iwl �Q m J NOTE - INS INSTALL SEALS FROM DRY SIDE OF PENETRATION. WET SDE ALTERNATE METHOD -CORE DRILL AND IS LLI FILLED WITH WATERPROOF - -.. MECHANICAL SEAL NO SLEEVE < GROUT. WALL THICKNESS REWIRED zo 1!) z � O m W PPE O.D. 2 1/2' Q OR AS NOTT ED J S.S. STEEL AND NEOPRENE \ 1/4' GALV STEEL SLEEVE o W (LINK SEAL) WITH WATER STOP 0 N.. _1/2 WALL TMCKNESS ?3 G/i THROUGH EXISTING WALL _EPDXY COMPQUND. CUT MOLE IN EXISTING - CONCRETE. FILL WITN NON -SHRINKING GROUT CUT OR BEND EXISTING RDNF. AS REQUIRED DRAWING NO. WALL SLEEVE DETAIL C-5W 1 MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE DETAILS SCALE: NOT TO SCALE SHEET 8 OF 8 , , V LiRMO V 1 Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Watershed Management Division Main Building, Second Floor One National Life Drive Montpelier, VT 05620-3522 December 5, 2012 Sanford Miller City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 5403 Re: Vermont MS4 General Permit 3-9014 (2012) Dear Permittee: Agency of Natural Resources [phone] 802-828-1535 Enclosed is your copy of the Vermont MS4 General Permit, issued December 5, 2012. The permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater runoff from your municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4). Please read this permit carefully, and note the requirements for submitting a Notice of Intent. The original draft permit was placed on public notice from 1/22/2010 through 4/22/2010. Additionally, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requested an extended EPA -only comment period following the close of public comment period. The final permit was revised based on both public comment and comments received by EPA. A response summary, along with a copy of the MS4 Permit, is available at http://www.vtwateEgualiiy.ory/stonnwater/htm/sw ms4.htm. We welcome your municipality's questions about the implementation of this permit. We plan to organize a meeting with the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission and can meet individually with you as well to discuss the permit and next steps. In addition, we will be available to assist in the development of the required Flow Restoration Plans (FRPs) by providing the latest modeling data and support to individual watershed modeling efforts. If you have any questions pertaining to this permit, please contact Christy Witters of the Stormwater Management Program at christy.witterskstate.vt.us , or at (802) 490-6173. Sincerely, Padraic Monks Stormwater Program Manager Enclosures To preserve, enhance, restore, and conserve Vermont's natural resources, and protect human health, for the benefit of this and future generations. NPDES Number: VTR040000 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT 3-9014 (2012) FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES FROM SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS This general permit is issued in accordance with the following state and federal laws and rules: the Vermont Water Pollution Control statute, 10 V.S.A. Chapter 47, including §§ §1258, 1259, 1263, 1264 and 1264a; the Vermont Water Pollution Control Rules, Chapter 13, including the rule governing general permits in Section 13.12; the federal Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C.A. 1251 et seq., including 33 U.S.C.A. 1342(p); and regulations of the federal Environmental Protection Agency including but not limited to 40 CFR 122.26, 40 CFR 122.28 and 40 C.F.R. 122.30 to 122.37. Except as provided in Subpart I.C. of this permit, operators of regulated small municipal separate storm sewer systems (small MS4s) located within the State of Vermont who submit a Notice of Intent and a Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) in accordance with this permit are authorized to discharge pollutants to waters of the State and waters of the United States in accordance with the conditions and requirements set forth herein. Regulated small MS4s must develop, implement, and enforce a SWMP designed to reduce the discharge of pollutants from the small MS4 to the maximum extent practicable (MEP), to protect water quality, and to satisfy the appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act. For purposes of this permit, narrative effluent limitations requiring implementation of best management practices (BMPs) are generally the most appropriate form of effluent limitations when designed to satisfy technology requirements (including reductions of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable) and to protect water quality. I. COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT A. Permit Coverage This general permit covers: 1. In accordance with 40 CFR §122.32(a)(1), small MS4s in Vermont urbanized areas (UA) as determined by the Bureau of the Census in the 2000 Census or any subsequent decennial census; and Page 1 of 45 2. Small MS4s in the watersheds of stormwater-impaired waters as determined by the Secretary which are located fully or partially in a Vermont urbanized area, and 3. Small MS4s in such areas as defined by the Secretary when designating a small MS4 to be covered under this permit pursuant to 40 CFR 123.35(b). This permit provides coverage for the following small MS4s: Burlington, Colchester, Essex, Essex Junction, Milton, Shelburne, South Burlington, Williston, and Winooski, the University of Vermont, the Burlington International Airport and the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans). The VTrans small MS4 includes state highways in the above mentioned municipalities and in the towns of Jericho and Underhill. This permit may also provide coverage for any additional small MS4s designated by the Secretary pursuant to 40 CFR 123.35(b). B. Small MS4s Covered and Eligible Discharges 1. This permit authorizes discharges of stormwater from small MS4s, as defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(16). A small MS4 is authorized to discharge under the terms and conditions of this general permit if it: a) Operates a small MS4 within the permit area described in Subpart I.A., and b) Is not a "large" or "medium" MS4 as defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(4) or (7), and c) Submits a Notice of Intent (NOI) in accordance with Part II of this permit, and complies with the terms and conditions of this permit, and d) Is located fully or partially within an urbanized area as determined by the Bureau of the Census in the 2000 Census or any subsequent decennial census, or e) Is designated by the Secretary as a small MS4 that requires permit coverage pursuant to 40 CFR 123.35(b) or 122.32(a)(2). 2. The following discharges are eligible for authorization under this general permit: a) Stormwater discharges. This permit authorizes stormwater discharges to waters of the State and waters of the United States from the small MS4s identified in Subpart I.B.1, except as excluded in Subpart I.C. b) Non-stormwater discharges. A small MS4 is authorized to commingle discharges from the following non-stormwater sources with discharges of Page 2 of 45 stormwater from the small MS4 provided that these sources are not substantial contributors of pollutants to the small MS4: c) Water line flushing d) Landscape irrigation e) Diverted stream flows f) Rising ground waters g) Uncontaminated ground water h) Uncontaminated pumped ground water i) Discharges from potable water sources j) Foundation drains k) Air conditioning condensate 1) Irrigation water m) Springs n) Water from crawl space pumps o) Footing drains p) Lawn watering q) Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, and r) Discharges from fire fighting activities. C. Limitations on Coverage 1. This permit does not authorize: a) Discharges that are mixed with sources of non-stormwater unless such non-stormwater discharges are in compliance with a separate NPDES permit. Page 3 of 45 b) Any discharge or activity that (1) results in the prohibited take of any federally listed threatened or endangered species or other violation of 16 U.S.C. § 1538 and its implementing regulations, (2) results in the prohibited taking, possession, or transport of any state or federally threatened or endangered species in violation of 10 V.S.A. § 5403, or (3) jeopardizes conservation programs established by the Secretary under 10 V.S.A. § 5405. c) Discharges that fail to reduce the discharge of pollutants from the small MS4 to the maximum extent practicable (MEP), to protect water quality, and to satisfy the appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act. The Secretary may require corrective action or an application for an individual permit or alternative general permit if a small MS4 is determined by the Secretary to fail to satisfy appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act. d) Discharges of any pollutant into any water for which either a Water Quality Remediation Plan has been established pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 1264 or a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) has been either established or approved by EPA pursuant to Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act unless the discharge is consistent with the assumptions and requirements of any available wasteload allocation for the discharge approved by EPA pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 130.7. This eligibility condition applies at the time a Notice of Intent for coverage (NOI) is submitted. If a condition changes after submission of a NOI, permit coverage will continue provided that the permittee complies with the applicable requirements of Part IV. If the Secretary determines that more stringent requirements are necessary to support achievement with any future TMDLs or WQRPs, the Secretary will impose such requirements through a modification of this permit or by their inclusion in this permit upon reissuance. Alternatively, the Secretary may notify the permittee that an individual permit application is necessary. D. Application for Permit Coverage 1. To apply for authorization to discharge stormwater from a small MS4, a notice of intent (NOI) and SWMP must be submitted in accordance with the deadlines in Subpart II.A. of this permit. NOI forms are available on the Agency web site at: http://www.vtwaterguality.org/stonnwater/htm/sw ms4.htm Note: If the Secretary notifies dischargers (either directly, by public notice, or by making information available on the Internet) of other NOI form options that become available at a later date (e. g. electronic submission of forms), an Page 4 of 45 applicant may take advantage of those options to satisfy the NOI use and submittal requirements of Part II of this permit. After the Secretary has determined that an NOI is administratively complete, the Secretary will provide public notice of the NOI to the clerk of all municipalities in which the small MS4 discharges. The Secretary will also provide notice of the NOI to persons who have requested to be notified of permit applications pursuant to Section 13.3 c.(1)(c) of the Vermont Water Pollution Control Regulations. The public will be given a minimum of 10 days to submit comments on the NOI to the Secretary. 2. The Agency may deny coverage under this permit and require submittal of an application for an individual NPDES permit based on a review of the NOI or other information. If the Secretary denies coverage to discharge under this general permit the small MS4 must, within 60 days of that determination, submit an application for an individual permit. 3. Where the operator changes, or where a new operator is added after submittal of a NOI under Part 11, a new NOI must be submitted in accordance with Part II prior to the change or addition. E. Waivers from Permit Coverage 1. The Secretary may waive the requirements otherwise applicable to regulated small MS4s, as defined in 40 C.F.R.122.32(a)(1), and operated by a municipality under the following circumstances: a) The Secretary may waive permit coverage if a small MS4 serves a population of less than 1,000 within the urbanized area and it meets the following criteria: (1) The system is not contributing substantially to the pollutant loadings of a physically interconnected small MS4 that is regulated by this permit, and (2) If the system discharges any pollutant(s) that have been identified as a cause of impairment of any water body to which it discharges, storm water controls are not needed based on wasteload allocations that are part of an EPA approved or established "total maximum daily load" (TMDL) that addresses the pollutant(s) of concern. b) The Secretary may waive permit coverage if the small MS4 serves a population under 10,000 and it meets the following criteria: Page 5 of 45 (1) All waters of the U.S., including small streams, tributaries, lakes, and ponds, that receive a discharge from the small MS4 have been evaluated by the permittee; (2) For all such waters, the Secretary determines that stormwater controls are not needed based on wasteload allocations that are part of an EPA approved or established TMDL that addresses the pollutant(s) of concern or, if a TMDL has not been developed or approved, an equivalent analysis that determines sources and allocations for the pollutant(s) of concern; (3) For the purpose of Subpart I.E.I .b. the pollutant(s) of concern include biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), sediment or a parameter that addresses sediment (such as total suspended solids, turbidity or siltation), stormwater, pathogens, oil and grease, and any pollutant that has been identified as a cause of impairment of any water body that will receive a discharge from the small MS4; and (4) The Secretary determines that future discharges from a small MS4 do not have the potential to result in exceedances of water quality standards, including impairment of designated uses, or other significant water quality impacts, including habitat and biological impacts. c) The Secretary may rescind a waiver when there is evidence that the information required for granting the waiver has substantially changed. All waivers will be reviewed at the time of the reissuance of this general permit. The Secretary will consider any petition to review any waiver when the petitioner provides evidence that the information required for granting the waiver has substantially changed. F. Additional Authorities 1. Discharges eligible for coverage under this permit may require coverage under additional authorities, including but not limited to: a) Stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity as defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b) (14)(i)-(ix) and (xi). b) Stormwater discharges associated with construction activity as defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(x) or 40 CFR § 122.26(b)(15). c) Stormwater discharges associated with post -construction stormwater management pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §1264. Page 6 of 45 J II. NOTICE OF INTENT REQUIREMENTS A. Deadlines for Submission of Notice of Intent 1. If an applicant has been previously regulated as an operator of a small MS4 and obtained coverage under the 2003 small MS4 permit, then it shall submit a revised NOI and a SWMP or apply for an individual permit within 180 days of the effective date of this permit. If an applicant has been designated as an operator of a regulated small MS4 prior to the effective date of this permit, but was not required to obtain coverage under the 2003 small MS4 permit, then it shall submit a NOI and a SWMP or apply for an individual permit no later than 270 days after the effective date of this permit. 2. If an entity is designated by Secretary as an operator of a regulated small MS4 under 40 CFR 122.32(a)(2), 122.32(c) or 123.35(b) concurrent with or after the effective date of this permit, then it is required to submit a NOI and provide its SWMP to the Secretary within 270 days of notice of designation. 3. An applicant is not prohibited from submitting a NOI after the dates provided in Subpart II.A. If a late NOI is submitted, authorization is only for discharges that occur after the date of submission. The Secretary reserves the right to take appropriate enforcement actions for any unpermitted discharges. B. Contents of the Notice of Intent The Notice(s) of Intent must be signed in accordance with Section VI.H. of this permit and must include, at a minimum, the following information: 1. Information on the Permittee: a) The name of the entity and mailing address and telephone number. b) Name of person responsible for overall coordination of the SWMP, and mailing address and telephone number. c) An estimate of the area in the small MS4. 2. Information on the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System: a) Identify the names of all known waters that receive a discharge from the small MS4. Please indicate which, if any, of these waters are impaired and the nature of the impairment. If available, indicate the number of outfalls to each receiving water. Page 7 of 45 b) If an applicant is relying on another entity to satisfy one or more of the applicant's permit obligations, the identity of that entity(ies) and the element(s) it will be implementing. c) Information on the chosen best management practices (BMPs) and the measurable goals for each of the stormwater six minimum control measures in Section IV.G. of this permit, the timeframe for implementing each of the BMPs, and the person or persons responsible for implementing or coordinating the SWMP. d) Provide all additional information required in the NOI relating to requirements to protect water quality, including but not limited to TMDL implementation requirements. C. Submittal of Permit Fees The NOI must be accompanied by payment of applicable stormwater permit fees. Stormwater permit fees are established by state statute and changed periodically. An applicant will be notified of current fees when requesting a NOI application form. D. Where to Submit NOI 1. Submit the NOI, together with the correct permit fees to the following address: MS4 Permit Coordinator VT Department of Environmental Conservation Watershed Management Division Stormwater Management Program Main Building, Second Floor One National Life Drive Montpelier, VT 05620-3522 E. Co-Permittees Under a Single NOI A permittee may partner with other small MS4s to develop and implement its SWMP. Small MS4s may also jointly submit a NOI. Each small MS4 must fill out a NOI form. The SWMP must clearly describe which permittees are responsible for implementing each of the measures in the SWMP. III. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The permittee must develop a written stormwater management program (SWMP). The SWMP must be signed in accordance with Section VI.H. of this permit. The SWMP shall provide measurable goals for the development and implementation of the six minimum measures described in Subparts IV.F and G and additional measures necessary Page 8 of 45 to protect water quality described in Part IV. A permittee's approved Flow Restoration Plan developed in accordance with Subpart IV.C. 1 shall be considered a part of the permittee's SWMP. IV. DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS A. Water Quality Based Requirements Pursuant to Clean .Water Act 402(p)(3)(B)(iii), this permit includes provisions which require the permittee to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, protect water quality, and to satisfy the Clean Water Act. The requirements found in Subparts IV. B, C, and D that relate to discharges to impaired waters constitute the water quality based requirements of this permit and the requirements in Part F constitute the maximum extent practicable requirements. B. Requirements to Meet Water Quality Standards 1. Discharges shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable water quality standards for the receiving water. Applicable water quality standards are the Vermont Water Quality Standards that are in place upon the effective date of this permit. 2. Except for discharges addressed by Part IV.C.1, if at any time the permittee becomes aware, or the Secretary determines, that a discharge causes or contributes to an exceedance of applicable water quality standards, the permittee shall within 60 days of becoming aware of the situation eliminate the conditions causing or contributing to the exceedance of water quality standards. If elimination within 60 days is infeasible the permittee shall document in the SWMP measures and anticipated timeframes to eliminate the conditions causing or contributing to the exceedances. This 60 day period does not constitute a grace period for purposes of enforcement of Water Quality Standards or this permit. Within 30 days of eliminating the condition, the permittee shall document the measures used to correct the condition in the SWMP. The permittee shall include in its annual report a description of any such discharges identified during the reporting period; a description of measures taken to eliminate conditions during the reporting period or the basis of a finding that elimination is infeasible; a description of measures taken to eliminate such discharges during the reporting period; and a timeframe for completion of all steps necessary to eliminate such discharges. The permittee shall comply with any additional requirements or schedules established by the Secretary, including any requirement to submit additional information concerning the potential cause of the exceedance. The Secretary reserves the right to notify the permittee that an alternative permit or individual permit is necessary in accordance with Subpart VI.R., to modify this permit if needed, and to take any enforcement action allowed under federal or state law. Page 9 of 45 C. Discharges to Impaired Waters Impaired waters are those waters that the Secretary has identified pursuant to Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act as not meeting the Vermont Water Quality Standards. Impaired waters encompass both those with approved Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), and those for which TMDL development has been identified as necessary, but for which a TMDL has not yet been approved by the Secretary or EPA. Stormwater impaired waters include those waters that the Secretary has listed as impaired primarily due to stormwater runoff on the EPA -approved State of Vermont 303(d) List of Waters. 1. Discharges to Impaired Waters with an Approved TMDL a) For any discharge from the small MS4 to impaired waters with an approved TMDL, the permittee shall comply with Subpart IV.0 of this permit. For purposes of this permit, an "approved TMDL" is a TMDL that has been approved by EPA as of the effective date of this permit. The permittee shall control discharges consistent with the assumptions and requirements of any wasteload allocation (WLA) applicable to the permittee in the TMDL. The permittee shall describe in the SWMP all measures that are being used to address this requirement. The Secretary may notify the permittee of the need to comply with additional requirements that are consistent with the assumptions and requirements of any applicable WLA or that an individual permit application is necessary in accordance with Subpart VI.R. b) If the applicable TMDL does not specify a wasteload allocation or other requirements either individually or categorically for the small MS4 discharge and the permittee has complied with the terms and conditions of this permit, and has undertaken measures and documented them in the SWMP to address the pollutant(s) addressed by the TMDL, then compliance with these conditions will be presumed adequate to meet the requirements of this permit. c) If the applicable TMDL specifies a wasteload allocation or other requirements either individually or categorically for the small MS4 discharge, the permittee shall describe in its annual reports all control measures which have been or are planned to be implemented to control discharges consistent with the assumptions and requirements of the TMDL WLA. The permittee shall include in the annual reports and the SWMP the rationale supporting the permittee's assessment that such controls are adequate to meet the applicable TMDL requirements. d) For those small MS4s that discharge to stormwater-impaired waters with EPA -approved stormwater TMDLs, the permittee shall meet the Page 10 of 45 applicable WLA consistent with the assumptions and requirements of the TMDL. e) For those small MS4s that discharge to stormwater-impaired waters with EPA -approved stormwater TMDLs the permittee shall comply with the following requirements: (1) The permittee shall develop and submit a comprehensive Flow Restoration Plan (FRP) for the portion of each stormwater- impaired watershed within the permittee's boundaries. Permittees that discharge into the same stormwater-impaired watershed may elect to cooperate to develop a single FRP for the watershed. The FRP shall be submitted to the Secretary no later than three years after the date of issuance of an authorization to discharge to the permittee under this general permit. The FRP shall contain the following elements: (a) Identification of Required Controls. An identification of the suite of necessary stormwater BMPs that will be used to achieve the flow restoration targets. If a stormwater- impaired watershed includes lands outside the boundaries of a small MS4 permittee, the FRP shall address the permittee's commensurate share of necessary BMP implementation based on percent impervious land cover. (b) Design and Construction Schedule. A design and construction schedule for the stormwater BMPs that have been identified by the permittee as necessary to achieve the flow restoration targets. The schedule shall include a discussion of any necessary permits or other regulatory approvals necessary for implementation of the required BMPs. The schedule shall provide for implementation of the required BMPs as soon as possible, but no later than 20 years from the effective date of this permit or from the date of the permittee's designation as a regulated small MS4, whichever is later. (c) Financial Plan. A financing plan that estimates the costs for implementing the FRP and describes a strategy for financing the FRP. The financing plan shall include the steps each permittee will take to implement the financing plan. (d) Regulatory Analysis. A regulatory analysis that identifies and describes what, if any, additional regulatory Page 11 of 45 authorities, including but not limited to the authority to require low impact development BMPs, the permittee will need in order for the permittee to implement the FRP. (e) Identification of Regulatory Assistance. An identification of regulatory assistance that the permittee will need from the Secretary in order to effectively implement the FRP. This should include an assessment of aspects of the FRP where the regulatory analysis indicates that the permittee's authority may not be sufficient to effectively implement the FRP. For example, use of residual designation authority pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 122.26. (f) Third -Party Implementation. An identification of the name of any party, other than the permittee, that is responsible for implementing any portion of the FRP. (2) Upon approval by the Secretary, the Flow Restoration Plan shall be a part of the permittee's S WMP. Any failure of the permittee to comply with the SWMP, including but not limited to the design and construction schedule in the approved FRP, shall constitute a violation of this permit. (3) Schedule of Compliance: The permittee shall implement measures necessary to achieve the flow restoration target in the TMDL no later than 20 years after the effective date of this permit or the date of the permittee's designation as a regulated small MS4, whichever is later. Subject to the requirements of section IV.J.3 of this permit, the Secretary may adjust a permittee's flow restoration targets during the term of this permit if justified by monitoring data or other relevant information. The following FRP development and implementation schedule shall apply. All milestone dates are calculated from the date of issuance of an authorization to discharge to the permittee under this general permit. The Secretary will include a reporting schedule in each permittee's authorization specifying the due dates for each of these deliverables. When FRP reporting deadlines coincide with the annual report due date, one report may be submitted. The permittee shall, according to the following schedule: Page 12 of 45 Month 3 Submit to the Secretary for approval a plan for meeting the requirements of IV.C.1(e)(7) (flow monitoring plan). Month 6 Submit to the Secretary for approval a plan for addressing expired state stormwater permits discharging to the permittee's MS4 system. This plan may include a request to the Secretary to exercise its Residual Designation Authority (RDA) pursuant to Clean Water Act §§402(p)(2)(E) and (6) and 40 C.F.R § 122.26 (a)(9)(i)(C) and (D) to require NPDES permits for stormwater systems with expired state stormwater permits. The permittee's plan for addressing the expired permits shall insure that all permitted facilities demonstrate compliance with the existing expired permit, at a minimum, and insure that these facilities are incorporated into the FRP. Identify the process the permittee intends to use to meet the requirements of IV.C.1 (development of FRP). Submit verification of implementation of flow monitoring, per IV.C.I (e)(7). Month 12 Submit semi-annual report* Month 18 Submit semi-annual report* Include in the semi-annual report the status of the permittee's development of the FRP, including a schedule for completion of the FRP Month 24 Submit a report verifying that all existing stormwater systems with expired permits are now in compliance with the existing expired permit or subject to a NPDES RDA permit, including verification that all required maintenance has been performed. Month 30 Submit semi-annual report* Year 3 Submit a complete FRP to the Secretary for approval. Month 42 and every 6 Submit semi-annual report* months thereafter Date specified in FRP Complete implementation of the approved FRP approval (not to exceed 20 years) *The permittee shall submit a report on a semi-annual basis on the permittee's development and implementation of the FRP. The report shall address actions taken to implement all FRP components, including the extent of BMP implementation, an estimate of the extent of completion for remaining items, and an assessment of the ability to meet outstanding schedule items. The FRP report shall include a written statement signed by a designer that any BMP built or implemented within the preceding 6 month period was constructed in compliance with the approved plans. The permittee shall include in each FRP report an estimate of any associated reductions in phosphorus loading that occur as a result of implementation measures undertaken by the permittee to meet the flow reduction targets. Page 13 of 45 (4) Commencing two years after the issuance of an authorization or designation as a regulated small MS4, the permittee shall develop a program to identify opportunities for and provide technical assistance to landowners in the implementation by landowners of low impact BMPs such as maximizing disconnection, maximizing infiltration of stormwater runoff, preventing and eliminating soil erosion, and preventing and eliminating the delivery of pollutants to stormwater conveyances. (5) Commencing two years after the issuance of an authorization or designation as a regulated small MS4, the permittee shall prepare and submit to the Agency a report on legal authorities or strategies that the permittee has adopted to protect and regulate development in the stream corridors of stormwater impaired waters. (6) Commencing two years after the issuance of an authorization or designation as a regulated small MS4, the permittee shall prepare and submit a plan for outlining options for enhanced protection of stream corridors of stormwater impaired waters. The plan should include a map of stream corridors depicting areas that have been converted to impervious surface and areas that are undeveloped or have not been converted to impervious surface. In preparing this plan, the permittee should review riparian buffer and stream fluvial geomorphological information provided to the permittee by the Agency as a result of the Agency's preparation of the stormwater TMDLs. (a) For those areas of stream corridors that have not been developed or otherwise converted to impervious surface, the permittee's plan should identify options for ensuring enhanced protection, which may include: (1) minimum widths of stream channel buffers requiring protections, 2) minimum setback requirements and 3) proposed planning and zoning regulations, municipal ordinances or codes, policies or other requirements to enhance protection of undeveloped stream corridors. (b) For those areas of stream corridors that have been developed or otherwise converted to impervious surfaces, the permittee's plan should identify options for stream corridor restoration, which may include: 1) restoring stream buffers and 2) relocation of development outside stream corridors for development projects. Page 14 of 45 N (7) As a result of a rigorous analysis of the requirements and the need for stormwater monitoring data summarized in the National Academy of Sciences report: Urban Stormwater Management in the United States (2009) and the Vermont Water Resources Board docket and proceedings described in "A Scientifically Based Assessment and Adaptive Management Approach to Stormwater Management"(2004) the Agency has instituted a network of stream flow gauging and rainfall gauging stations in the stormwater impaired watersheds. The Agency has funded the operation and maintenance of these stations for the years 2005-2009. As part of this long term monitoring effort: (a) The permittee shall implement, or otherwise fund, a flow and precipitation monitoring program, subject to approval by the Secretary, in its respective stormwater impaired watersheds. A nontraditional MS4, at a minimum, may cost share in the O&M cost of the gage(s) for each watershed into which it discharges. f) A permittee's discharges must be consistent with the assumptions and requirements of any wasteload allocation for the permittee's discharges in any future TMDL established or approved by EPA pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 130.7. If the Secretary determines that more stringent requirements are necessary to support achievement in any future TMDLs or WQRPs, the Secretary will impose such requirements through a modification of this permit or by their inclusion into this permit upon reissuance. Alternatively, the Secretary may notify the permittee that an individual permit application is necessary. Such consistency is also required for any future applicable Water Quality Remediation Plans established pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 1264 and for other applicable TMDLs for impaired waters adversely affected by a small MS4. g) The assessment of whether a SWMP is consistent with the assumptions and requirements of a stormwater TMDL will be based on the implementation and maintenance of best management practices identified in the FRP and on flow monitoring, not on measurements of pollutant loading. 2. Discharges to Impaired Waters without an Approved TMDL Page 15 of 45 If a small MS4 discharges to an impaired water that is without an approved TMDL, the permittee shall comply with Part IV of this permit and address in its S WMP and annual reports how any discharges that have the potential to cause or contribute to the impairment will be controlled so that they do not cause or contribute to the impairment. A small MS4 may achieve an increased level of control through additional BMPs or enhancement of existing BMPs. address in its SWMP and annual reports how any discharges that have the potential to cause or contribute to the impairment will be controlled so that they do not cause or contribute to the impairment. This plan shall be designed as an iterative process. The content of the response plan should reflect the magnitude and complexity of the impairment and the permittee's potential to contribute to the impairment. This 60 day period does not constitute a grace period for purposes of enforcement of Water Quality Standards or this permit. D. New Dischargers (Applicable Only to "Non Traditional MS4s") A new discharger is any building, structure, facility or installation (a) from which there is or may be a discharge of pollutants; (b) that did not commence the discharge of pollutants at a particular site prior to August 13, 1979 ; (c) that is not a new source; and (d) that never received a finally effective NPDES permit for discharges at that "site." For purposes of this permit "site" means the land area where the MS4 is located as of the effective date of this permit; and the same or contiguous land if any new structure, facility or installation that is served by the MS4 is created there after the effective date of this permit. New Discharger to Impaired Waters Without an Approved TMDL A new discharger to an impaired water without an approved TMDL is not eligible for coverage under this permit. The permittee must apply for an individual permit. 2. New Discharger to Impaired Waters with an Approved TMDL A new discharger to an impaired water with an approved TMDL is not eligible for coverage under this permit unless the permittee submits to the Secretary documentation before the commencement of the discharge that: a) There are sufficient remaining pollutant load allocations in all TMDLs applicable to the discharges; and b) The existing discharges to the waterbody are subject to compliance schedules designed to bring the waterbody into attainment with water quality standards; and c) Retains such documentation in the S WMP; or Page 16 of 45 d) To the extent consistent with law, establishes an offset for the discharge of the pollutant identified in the TMDL; and retain any relevant documentation with the SWMP; and e) Receives an affirmative determination from the Secretary that the new discharger meets the requirements of this paragraph; or f) Prevents exposure to stormwater of the pollutants for which the waterbody is impaired; or g) Documents that the pollutant(s) for which the waterbody, is impaired is not present in the discharge. The permittee must apply for an individual permit if the conditions above cannot be met. E. Discharges to High Quality Waters The requirements of this permit reflect the goal of the federal Clean Water Act and Vermont law to achieve and maintain water quality standards. Federal regulations pertaining to the state anti -degradation policies are found at 40 CFR § 131.12. Vermont's anti -degradation policy is set forth in Section 1-03 of the Vermont Water Quality Standards. This general permit does not authorize any new or increased discharge to receiving waters unless the new or increased discharge is consistent with Vermont's anti - degradation policy. F. Obligations Under other Permitting Programs Nothing in this permit shall relieve a permittee of its obligations under any other state or federal permit or permitting program. G. Requirements to Reduce Pollutants to the Maximum Extent Practicable - "The Six Minimum Measures" 1. A permittee shall develop, implement, and enforce a Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) designed to reduce the discharge of pollutants from the small MS4 to the maximum extent practicable (MEP), to protect water quality, and to satisfy the appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act. For purposes of this permit, narrative effluent limitations requiring implementation of best management practices (BMPs) are the most appropriate form of effluent limitations when designed to satisfy technology requirements (including reductions of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable) and to protect water quality. Implementation of best management practices for purposes of the six Page 17 of 45 minimum measures consistent with the provisions of the SWMP constitutes compliance with the standard of reducing pollutants to the "maximum extent practicable". 2. A permittee must develop and fully implement its SWMP for the six minimum measures in accordance with this permit by the expiration date of this permit. Nothing in this schedule is intended to relieve permittees previously authorized under the MS4 General Permit from continuing to implement the six minimum measures as previously authorized. The SWMP must include the following information for each of the six minimum control measures described in Subpart N.G. of this permit: a) The person or persons responsible for implementing or coordinating the BMPs for the SWMP. b) The best management practices (BMPs) that the permittee or another entity will implement for each of the stormwater six minimum measures. EPA has provided a list of sample BMPs on its web site: http://cfpub.epa. ov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/index.cfm c) The measurable goals for each of the BMPs including, as appropriate, the months and years in which the required actions will be undertaken, including interim milestones and the frequency of the action. When possible, the measurable goal should include outcome measures related to the BMPs impact on water quality, stream channel stability, ground water recharge, and flood protection, EPA has provided guidance on developing measurable goals at: http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/measurablegoals/index.cfm; 3. In addition to the requirements listed above, a permittee must provide a rationale for how and why it selected each of the BMPs and measurable goals for the SWMP. The rationale should describe: 1) the stormwater problems to be addressed by the BMP, 2) the major alternative BMPs to the ones selected and why they were not adopted, 3) the behavioral and institutional changes necessary to implement the BMP, and 4) expected water quality outcomes. 4. If applicable, describe the process for consultation with and involvement of public water suppliers with source water protection zones within the small MS4. H. Minimum Control Measures The six minimum control measures that must be included in the SWMP are: 1. Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts Page 18 of 45 a) A permittee must implement a public education program to distribute educational materials to the community or conduct equivalent outreach activities about the impacts of stormwater discharges on water bodies. The program shall include the steps that the public can take to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff including an explanation of the problem of stormwater volume and solutions for reducing the amount of runoff volume reaching waters of the state. At a minimum, the permittee must: (1) maintain on its own or in cooperation with other small MS4s a web site with locally relevant stormwater management information and promote its existence and use, and: (2) participate in the regional stormwater education and outreach strategy described in the March 10, 2008 memorandum of agreement between designated small MS4s, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission and the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, or subsequent amendment approved by the Secretary, or (3) in another regional stormwater education strategy if approved by the Agency, or (4) submit a plan based on the following EPA guidance documents: Fact Sheet 2.3, Stormwater Phase II Final Rule, Public Education and Outreach Minimum Control Measure (January, 2000), http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/fact2- 3.pdf, National Menu of Best Management Practices for NPDES Stormwater Phase II, http://cfpub.epa. gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/index. cfm; Measurable Goals Guidance for Phase II Small MS4s, http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/measurablegoals/ind ex.cfm or, (5) Undertake the following activities: (a) Develop or acquire informational brochures relevant to local stormwater concerns. (b) Distribute stormwater related brochures at least twice in the first year and once in subsequent years. Distribution Page 19 of 45 1 must be town -wide for municipalities. Non-traditional small MS4s must distribute such materials to those who routinely use their facilities. (c) Seek the cooperation of the local news media to run two or more stormwater-related news or feature stories per year. (d) For municipalities: develop elementary, middle school or high school education materials or curricula regarding local stormwater concerns based on new or existing material; conduct teacher training in at least 4 schools and in each subsequent year maintain program information and hold at least one refresher teacher training course. (e) For nontraditional small MS4s: Develop and implement public education campaigns (in addition to the brochure distributions) reasonably designed to educate frequent facility users. b) If a permittee elects to formulate its own public education and outreach program rather than participating in the regional initiative or the schedule of BMPs set forth in this subpart, it must document its decision process for the development of a stormwater public education and outreach program. The rationale statement must address the overall public education program and the individual BMPs, measurable goals and responsible persons for the program. The rationale statement must include the following information, at a minimum: (1) How the permittee plans to inform individuals and households about the steps they can take to reduce stormwater pollution. (2) How the permittee plans to inform individuals and groups on how to become involved in the stormwater program (with activities such as local stream and beach restoration activities). (3) Describe the target audiences for the education program who are likely to have significant stormwater impacts (including residential, commercial, industrial and institutional entities) and why those target audiences were selected. (4) What are the target pollutants and pollutant sources the public education program is designed to address? (5) What are the behavioral changes that the permittee seeks to achieve in order to reduce and eliminate stormwater pollution. Page 20 of 45 (6) What is the outreach strategy, including the mechanisms (e.g., printed brochures, newspapers, media, workshops, etc.) the permittee will use to reach the target audiences, and how many people does the permittee expect to reach and what degree of behavioral change the permittee expects to achieve the outreach strategy over the permit term. (7) Who is responsible for overall management and implementation of the stormwater public education and outreach program and, if different, who is responsible for each of the BM Ps identified for this program. (8) How the permittee selected the measurable goals for each of the BMPs and how will the permittee evaluate the success of this minimum measure in achieving goals for behavioral change and water quality. 2. Public Involvement/ Participation a) The permittee must implement a public involvement/ participation program, which at a minimum, complies with State and local public notice requirements, and includes at least three of the following: (1) Form a citizen stormwater advisory panel. (2) Establish or support a water quality monitoring program involving citizen volunteers. (3) Institute an on -going public workshop series on stormwater awareness. (4) Institute a continuing storm drain stenciling project. (5) Sponsor periodic community stream corridor clean-up days. (6) Establish and support a citizen "stormwater watch" group. (7) Create or support an "adopt -a -stream" program. (8) Undertake a program similar in content and scope to the above with the permission of the Secretary. (9) As an alternative to implementing three activities from the above list the permittee may participate the regional stormwater public involvement and participation program described in the Page 21 of 45 May 1, 2011 memorandum of understanding between the designated small MS4s and the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, or subsequent amendments as approved by the Secretary, or in a regional public involvement and participation strategy if approved by the Secretary. b) If a permittee elects to implement a public involvement/participation program rather than participate in the regional stormwater public involvement and participation program described in the May 1, 2011 memorandum of understanding between designated small MS4s and the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission or another regional public involvement and participation strategy approved by the Secretary, the permittee must document the decision process for the development of a stormwater public involvement/participation program. The rationale statement must address your overall public involvement/participation program and the individual BMPs, measurable goals, and responsible persons for the program. The rationale statement must include the following information, at a minimum: (1) Describe the plan to actively involve the public in the further development and implementation of the permittee's program. (2) Describe the target audiences for the public involvement program, including a description of the types of ethnic and economic groups engaged. Permittees are encouraged to actively involve all potentially affected stakeholder groups, including commercial and industrial businesses, trade associations, environmental groups, homeowners associations, and educational organizations, among others. (3) Describe the types of public involvement activities included in the program. (4) Describe the structure of responsibility the overall management and implementation of the stormwater public involvement/ participation program and, if different, describe the responsible entities for each of the BMPs identified for this program. (5) Describe how the success of this minimum measure will be evaluated; including measurable goals for each of the BMPs was selected. c) A permittee must make its SWAP and annual reports to the Agency available electronically on its web site. The SWMP and the reports should be posted no more than six months after their due date. Page 22 of 45 3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination a) A permittee must: (1) Develop, implement and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges (as defined in 40 CFR § 122.26(b) (2)) into its small MS4, if it has not already done so. (2) Develop, if not already completed, and maintain a storm sewer geographic information systems (GIS) or AutoCAD map of the small MS4, showing the location of all outfalls and the names and location of all waters of the State and waters of the United States that receive discharges from those outfalls. Permittees are encouraged to work with their regional planning commission and the Agency to acquire funding assistance for maintenance and updating of small MS4 maps. (3) To the extent allowable under State or local law, effectively prohibit, through ordinance, or other regulatory mechanism, non- stormwater discharges into the permittee's storm sewer system and implement appropriate enforcement procedures and actions. Nontraditional small MS4s shall adopt a policy prohibiting the discharge of foreign substances into storm drains and suitable means of enforcing it. (4) Develop and implement a plan to detect and address non- stormwater discharges, with emphasis on outfalls in the stormwater impaired watershed(s) and random illegal dumping to the system, such as the dumping of RV wastes, used oil, paint, etc. In developing the plan the permittee should collect or utilize existing local or Agency data. The permittee may conduct such investigations itself, contract for investigation; coordinate with storm drain investigation activities of others, or any combination of these approaches. (5) Inform public employees, businesses, and the general public of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste. (6) Address the following categories of non-stormwater discharges or flows (i.e., illicit discharges) only if the permittee identifies them as significant contributors of pollutants to the small MS4: water line flushing, landscape irrigation, diverted stream flows, rising ground waters, uncontaminated ground water infiltration (as defined at 40 CFR § 35.2005(20)), uncontaminated pumped Page 23 of 45 a ground water, discharges from potable water sources, foundation drains, air conditioning condensation, irrigation water, springs, water from crawl space pumps, footing drains, lawn watering, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, and discharges from fire fighting activities. (7) Provide the Secretary with an annual status report of monitoring activities conducted and corrective actions taken. The final annual report required by this permit shall summarize the monitoring activities and corrective actions taken during the course of this permit. b) A permittee must document its decision making process for the development of a stormwater illicit discharge detection and elimination program. The rationale statement must address the overall illicit discharge detection and elimination program and the individual BMPs, measurable goals, and responsible persons for the program. The rational statement must include the following information, at a minimum: (1) How the permittee will maintain and improve the storm sewer map showing the location of all outfalls and the names and location of all receiving waters. Describe the sources of information the permittee used for the maps, and how it plans to verify the outfall locations with field surveys. (2) The mechanism (ordinance or other regulatory mechanism) the permittee used to effectively prohibit illicit discharges into the small MS4 and why the permittee chose that mechanism. Include a copy of the relevant ordinance or policy with the program. (3) The plan to ensure through appropriate enforcement procedures and actions that the illicit discharge ordinance (or other regulatory mechanism) is implemented. (4) The plan to detect and address illicit discharges to the system, including discharges from illegal dumping and spills. The plan must include dry weather field screening for non-stormwater flows and field tests of selected chemical parameters as indicators of discharge sources. The plan must also address on -site sewage disposal systems that flow into the storm drainage system. The plan must address the following, at a minimum: (a) Procedures for locating priority areas which include areas with higher likelihood of illicit connections (e. g., areas with older sanitary sewer lines, for example) or Page 24 of 45 ambient sampling to locate impacted reaches. (b) Procedures for tracing the source of an illicit discharge, including the specific techniques that will be used to detect the location of the source. (c) Procedures for removing the source of the illicit discharge. (d) Procedures for program evaluation and assessment. (5) How the permittee plans to inform public employees, businesses, and the general public of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste. Include how this plan will coordinate the public education minimum measure and the pollution prevention/good housekeeping minimum measure programs. (6) Who is responsible for overall management and implementation of the stormwater illicit discharge detection and elimination program and, if different, who is responsible for each of the BMPs identified for this program. (7) How the permittee will evaluate the success of this minimum measure, including how the measurable goals for each of the BMPs was selected. 4. Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control a) Pursuant to federal regulations at 40 C.F.R. 122.34(b)(4) the permittee must to the extent allowable under state or local law develop, if it has not already done so, and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in any stormwater runoff to the small MS4 from construction activities that result in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre. Reduction of stormwater discharges from construction activity disturbing less than one acre must be included in the program if that construction activity is part of a larger common plan of development or sale that would disturb one acre or more. The Secretary is also required to regulate stormwater runoff from construction activities that result in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre. The Secretary has issued General Permit 3-9020 (2008) for stormwater runoff from construction activities which result in a land disturbance equal to or greater than one acre. If a construction project with a potential to discharge stormwater, which results in a land disturbance of equal to or greater than one acre does not qualify for Page 25 of 45 coverage under one of these general permits then an individual NPDES permit from the Secretary is required. The requirements of the Agency's construction stormwater program are at least as stringent as the requirements of 40 C.F.R. 122.34(b)(4). Consequently a permittee is not required to develop a separate program. However, a permittee shall: (1) Develop and implement procedures to assure that construction activities undertaken by the permittee are properly permitted and implemented in accordance with the terms of the construction permit. (2) In conjunction with the review required by Subpart IV.H.5.c, the permittee shall review existing policies; planning, zoning and subdivision regulations; and ordinances to determine their effectiveness in managing construction -related erosion and sediment and controlling waste such as discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, litter, and sanitary waste at construction sites that may cause adverse impacts to water quality. The policies, regulations, and ordinances must also be reviewed for their consistency with the requirements of the Secretary's general permits for stormwater runoff from large and small construction sites and construction erosion guidelines for low impact development. The permittee may adopt requirements that complement or are more stringent than the requirements of the Secretary. (3) Develop and implement an erosion control ordinance, or zoning or subdivision regulation, or other regulatory mechanism, or if a nontraditional small MS4 a policy which, at a minimum, regulates development activities not subject to state or federal erosion control requirements. b) If the Secretary ceases to implement the Agency's stormwater construction permit program, this permit shall be reopened and modified to include a requirement that a permittee implement all components of this minimum measure. c) The permittee must document its decision making process for the development of a construction site stormwater control program. The rationale statement must address the overall construction site stormwater control program and the individual BMPs, measurable goals, and responsible persons for the program. The rationale statement must include the following information, at a minimum: (1) The mechanism (ordinance or other regulatory mechanism) the permittee uses to require erosion and sediment controls at Page 26 of 45 construction sites and why that mechanism was chosen. Include a copy of the relevant ordinance or policy with the SWMP. (2) Who is responsible for overall management and implementation of the construction site stormwater control program and, if different, who is responsible for each of the BMPs identified for this program. (3) Describe how the permittee will evaluate the success of this minimum measure, including how the permittee selected the measurable goals for each of the BMPs. 5. Post -Construction Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment a) Pursuant to 40 C.F.R 122.34(b)(5) a permittee must develop, if it has not already done so, implement, and to the extent allowable under State or local.law, enforce a program to address post -construction stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment projects that disturb greater than or equal to one acre, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale, that discharge into the small MS4. The program must ensure that controls are in place that would prevent or minimize water quality impacts. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §§ 1263, 1264 and Agency rules and procedures adopted there under, the Secretary is required to regulate post -construction stormwater runoff from activities that result in creation of new or expansion of existing impervious surface of greater than one acre. The requirements of the Agency's post construction stormwater program are at least as stringent as the requirements of 40 CFR 122.34(b)(5) for state - regulated projects. Consequently, the permittee does not need to develop a separate post -construction permit program for projects regulated by the Agency. However, there is a gap between what the Agency's post - construction stormwater management permit program regulates and the land disturbances equal to one or more acre of land that small MS4s must regulate. There is a regulatory gap consisting of activities that disturb greater than one acre of earth but that do not result in creation of new or expansion of existing impervious surface of greater than acre. Consequently a permittee must develop, if it has not already done so, implement, and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in any post -construction stormwater runoff to the small MS4 from activities that result in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre and that are not subject to regulation under the Agency's post -construction stormwater management permit program. Page 27 of 45 Nontraditional and traditional small MS4s are encouraged to cooperate when stormwater runoff moves across MS4 jurisdictional boundaries. b) If the Secretary ceases to implement the Agency's post -construction stormwater permit program, this permit shall be reopened and modified to include a requirement that a permittee implement all components of this minimum measure. c) In conjunction with the review required by Subpart IV.H.4.a.2., the permittee must review existing policies, planning, zoning and subdivision regulations, and ordinances to: (1) determine their effectiveness in managing stormwater runoff that discharges into the small MS4 from new development and redevelopment projects to prevent adverse impacts to water quality: (2) determine their consistency with the requirements of the Secretary's rules and general permits regulating post -construction stormwater runoff ; (3) assess whether changes can be made to such policies, regulations and ordinances in order to support low impact design options (e.g. green roofs, infiltration practices such as rain gardens, curb extensions, planter gardens, porous and pervious pavements, and other designs to manage stormwater using landscaping and structured or augmented soils and water harvesting devices such as rain barrels and cisterns and the use of stormwater for non -potable uses); and (4) assess whether changes can be made to current street design and parking lot guidelines and other local requirements that affect the creation of impervious surfaces to support low impact design options. Based on these reviews, the permittee may adopt requirements that complement or are more stringent than the requirements of the Secretary. d) The permittee must develop, if it has not already done so, and implement procedures to identify new development and redevelopment projects that disturb greater than or equal to one acre, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale. e) For stormwater runoff that discharges into the small MS4 from new development and redevelopment projects that disturb greater than or equal Page 28 of 45 to one acre (including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale) and that are not subject to regulation under the Agency's post -construction stormwater management permit program the permittee must adopt, if it has not already done so, an ordinance, planning, zoning and subdivision regulation, or other regulatory mechanism, or if the permittee is a nontraditional small MS4, a policy that: (1) Prevents or minimizes water quality impacts from post - construction stormwater runoff from such developments; and (2) Utilizes a combination of structural, non-structural and low impact best management practices (BMPs)(e.g. green roofs, infiltration practices such as rain gardens, curb extensions, planter gardens, porous and pervious pavements, and other designs to manage stormwater using landscaping and structured or augmented soils and water harvesting devices such as rain barrels and cisterns and the use of stormwater for non -potable uses) which are appropriate for the community and meet, at a minimum, requirements in the Agency's 2002 Vermont State Stormwater Management Manual (and any amendments thereto); and (3) Ensures adequate long-term operation and maintenance of BMPs. f) For stormwater runoff that discharges into the small MS4 from new development and redevelopment projects that disturb greater than or equal to one acre (including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale) and that are not subject to regulation under the Agency's post -construction stormwater management permit program the permittee must: (1) Develop, if it has already not done so, and implement procedures for inspecting development and redevelopment projects for compliance with the conditions of the permittee's regulations. Nontraditional and traditional small MS4s will cooperate when stormwater runoff moves across small MS4 jurisdictional boundaries. (2) Develop, if the permittee has not already done so, and implement procedures to assure that development and redevelopment activities undertaken by the permittee, including road projects, are properly permitted and constructed and maintained in accordance with the terms of the procedures. Page 29 of 45 U g) The permittee must document its decision making process for the development of a program for management of post -construction storm water runoff. The rationale statement must address the overall strategy for post -construction storm water management and the individual BMPs, measurable goals, and responsible persons for the program. The rationale statement must include the following information, at a minimum: (1) What are the mechanisms (ordinance or other regulatory mechanisms) the permittee will use to address post -construction runoff from new developments and redevelopments that result in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre and that are not subject to the Agency's post -construction stormwater management permit program and why did the permittee choose those mechanisms. Include a copy of the relevant ordinance with the program. (2) How the permittee will ensure the long-term operation and maintenance (O&M) of the selected BMPs. Options to help ensure that future O&M responsibilities are clearly identified include an agreement between the permittee and another party such as the post -development landowners or a stormwater utility. (3) The permittee's procedures for site inspection and enforcement, to address post -construction runoff from new developments and redevelopments that result in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre and that are not subject to the Agency's post - construction stormwater management permit program, including how the permittee will prioritize sites for inspection. (4) Who is responsible for overall management and implementation of the program for management of post - construction storm water runoff and, if different, who is responsible for each of the BMPs identified for this program. (5) How the permittee will evaluate the success of this minimum measure, including how it selected the measurable goals for each of the BMPs. 6. Pollution Prevention/ Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Page 30 of 45 a) The permittee must describe its operation and maintenance program for preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from small MS4 operations, including, at a minimum: new construction and land disturbance, maintenance of fleet and buildings, all municipal garages, parks, open space, construction and maintenance practices for gravel backroads, snow disposal and stormwater systems. The program must include a training component, maintenance schedules, and inspection procedures for long term structural controls. For all facilities under municipal control including public parks and recreational fields where lawn or garden fertilizers are used in the facility operation the permittee must prohibit the use of any phosphorus containing fertilizer unless warranted by a current soil test. If a phosphorus fertilizer is used, a copy of the soil test for those facilities must be performed annually and submitted with the annual report. This requirement does not apply to community gardens. (1) A permittee may comply with this measure for municipal garages by participation in the Agency's Municipal Compliance Assistance Program or another facility audit program approved by the Secretary provided that any deficiencies identified must be corrected and documented within 90 days. (2) The permittee must provide a list of industrial facilities that it owns or operates that discharge to its small MS4 and are subject to an individual NPDES permit or the Agency's General Permit 3- 9003,Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity (2011) (NPDES Number: VTR 050001), including.facilities covered by a "no exposure certification". Include the permit number, a copy of the Industrial NOI form or the "no exposure" certification for each facility. b) The permittee must document its decision making process for the development of a pollution prevention/good housekeeping program for municipal operations. The rationale statement must address the overall pollution prevention/good housekeeping program and the individual BMPs, measurable goals, and responsible persons for the program. The rationale statement must include the following information, at a minimum: (1) The operation and maintenance program to prevent or reduce pollutant runoff from municipal operations. The program must specifically list the municipal operations that are impacted by this operation and maintenance program. (2) The program should address the following areas: Page 31 of 45 (a) Maintenance activities, maintenance schedules, and long-term inspection procedures for controls to reduce floatables and other pollutants to the MS4. (b) Controls for reducing or eliminating the discharge of. pollutants from streets, roads, highways, gravel backroads, municipal parking lots, maintenance and storage yards, waste transfer stations, fleet or maintenance shops with outdoor storage areas, salt/sand storage locations and snow disposal areas the permittee operates. (c) Procedures for compliance with any applicable state and federal regulations for the proper disposal of waste removed from the small MS4 and the municipal operations, including dredge spoil, accumulated sediments, floatables, and other debris. (3) Who is responsible for overall management and implementation of the pollution prevention/good housekeeping program and, if different, who is responsible for each of the BMPs identified for this program. (4) How the permittee will evaluate the success of this minimum measure, including how it selected the measurable goals for each of the BMPs. I. Sharing Responsibility Implementation of one or more of the minimum measures or measures taken to implement a TMDL may be shared with another entity, or another entity may fully take over the measure. A permittee may rely on another entity only if: 1. The other entity, in fact, implements the control measure; 2. The particular control measure, or component of that measure, is at least as stringent as the corresponding NPDES permit requirement. 3. The other entity agrees to implement the control measure on the permittee's behalf. Written acceptance of this obligation is required. This obligation must be maintained as part of the S WMP. If the other entity agrees to report on the minimum measures or TMDL implementation activities, the permittee must supply the other entity with the reporting requirements contained in this permit. If the other entity fails to implement the control measure on behalf of the permittee, then the permittee remains responsible for compliance with permit obligations. J. Reviewing and Updating Storm Water Management Programs Page 32 of 45 1. SWMP Review: The permittee must perform an annual review of its SWMP in conjunction with preparation of the annual report required under Subpart V.C. 2. SWMP Update: A permittee may change its SWMP during the life of the permit in accordance with the following procedures: a) Changes adding (but not subtracting or replacing) components, controls, or requirements to the SWMP may be made at any time upon written notification to the Secretary. b) Changes replacing an ineffective or unfeasible BMP specifically identified in the SWMP with an alternate BMP may be requested at any time. Modification requests must include the following: (1) An analysis of why the BMP is ineffective or infeasible (including cost prohibitive), (2) Expectations on the effectiveness of the replacement BMP, and (3) An analysis of why the replacement BMP is expected to achieve the goals of the BMP to be replaced. c) Change requests or notifications must be made in writing and signed in accordance with Subpart VI.H. 3. SWMP Updates Required by the Secretary: The Secretary may require changes to the SWMP as needed to: a) Address impacts on receiving water quality caused, or contributed to, by discharges from the small MS4 system. b) Include more stringent requirements necessary to comply with new Federal statutory or regulatory requirements; or c) Include such other conditions deemed necessary by the Secretary to comply with the goals and requirements of the Clean Water Act, including any EPA approved TMDLs. d) Changes requested by the Secretary must be made in writing, set forth the time schedule for the permittee to develop the changes, and offer the permittee the opportunity to propose alternative program changes to meet the objective of the requested modification. All changes required by the Secretary will be made in accordance with 40 CFR 124.5, 40 CFR 122.62, or as appropriate 40 CFR 122.63. Page 33 of 45 4. Transfer of Ownership, Operational Authority, or Responsibility for SWMP Implementation: The permittee must implement the SWMP on all new areas added to the permittee's portion of the municipal separate storm sewer system (or for which the permittee becomes responsible for implementation of stormwater quality controls) as soon as practicable, but not later than one year from addition of the new areas. Implementation may be accomplished in a phased manner to allow additional time for controls that cannot be implemented immediately. a) Within 90 days of a transfer of ownership, operational authority, or responsibility for SWMP implementation, a permittee must have a plan for implementing its SWMP on all affected areas. The plan may include schedules for implementation. Information on all new annexed areas and any resulting updates required to the SWMP must be included in the annual report. This 90 day period does not constitute a grace period for purposes of enforcement of Water Quality Standards or this permit. b) Only those portions of the SWMP specifically required as permit conditions shall be subject to the modification requirements of 40 CFR 124.5. Addition of components, controls, or requirements by the permittee(s) and replacement of an ineffective or infeasible BMP implementing a required component of the SWMP with an alternate BMP expected to achieve the goals of the original BMP shall be considered minor changes to the SWMP and not modifications to the permit. V. MONITORING, RECORD KEEPING, AND REPORTING A. Monitoring 1. A permittee must evaluate program compliance, the appropriateness of identified best management practices, and progress toward achieving identified measurable goals. 2. When a permittee conducts monitoring of illicit discharges pursuant to Subpart IV.H.3.a.4. all samples and measurements taken shall be representative of the monitored activity. 3. Records of monitoring information shall include: a) The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; b) The names(s) of the individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; c) The date(s) analyses were performed; Page 34 of 45 d) The names of the individuals who performed the analyses; e) The analytical techniques or methods used; and f) The results of such analyses. 4. Discharge Monitoring Report. Monitoring results must be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). 5. The Agency may require a permittee on a case -by -case basis to undertake water quality monitoring at an individual stormwater discharge point if there is evidence of an unusual discharge or if it is necessary to verify the effectiveness of BMPs and other control measures in the permittee's SWMP. B. Record keeping 1. A permittee must retain records of all monitoring information, copies of all reportg'required by this permit, copies of Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs), a copy of the NPDES permit, and records of all data used to complete the application (NOI) for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application, or for the term of this permit, whichever is longer. This period may be extended by request of the Secretary at any time. 2. A permittee must submit its records to the Secretary only when specifically asked to do so. It must retain a copy of the SWMP required by this permit (including a copy of the permit language) at a location accessible to the Secretary. A permittee must make its records, including the notice of intent (NOI) and the copy of the SWMP, available to the public if requested to do so in writing. C. Reporting A permittee must submit its annual reports to the VTDEC Watershed Management Division, Stormwater Management Program within 30 days following the end of the permittee's fiscal year. FRP reports and may be included with the annual report when reporting deadlines coincide. In addition to any FRP reporting requirements, the report must include: 1. The status of the permittee's compliance with permit conditions, an assessment of the appropriateness of the identified best management practices, progress towards achieving implementation of BMPs necessary to meet TMDL requirements and progress towards achieving the statutory goal for the six minimum measures of reducing the discharge of pollutants to the MEP, and the measurable goals for each of the minimum control measures and TMDL implementation measures; Page 35 of 45 2. Results of information collected and analyzed, if any, during the reporting period, including monitoring data used to assess the success of the program at meeting TMDL requirements and the success of the six minimum measures. 3. A summary of the stormwater activities the permittee plans to undertake during the next reporting cycle (including an implementation schedule); 4. Proposed changes to the permittee's SWAP, including changes to any BMPs or any identified measurable goals that apply to the program elements; and 5. Notice that the permittee is relying on another government entity to satisfy some of its permit obligations (if applicable). VI. STANDARD PERMIT CONDITIONS A. Duty to Comply A permittee shall comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 47 and rules hereunder and the federal CWA and rules there under and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions 1. 10 V.S.A., Section 1275(a) provides that: Any person who violates any provision of this subchapter or who fails, neglects, or refuses to obey or comply with any order or the terms of any permit issued in accordance with this subchapter, shall be fined not more than $25,000.00 or be imprisoned not more than six months, or both. Each violation may be a separate offense and, in the case of a continuing violation, each day's continuance may be deemed a separate offense. 2. 10 V.S.A. Section 8010(c) provides that: A penalty of not more than $25,000.00 may be assessed for each determination of violation. In addition, if the Secretary determines that a violation is continuing the Secretary may assess a penalty of not more than $10,000.00 for each day the violation continues. The maximum amount of penalty assessed under this subsection shall not exceed $100,000.00. 3. 10 V.S.A. Section 1275 (b) provides that: Page 36 of 45 Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this subchapter, or by any permit, rule, regulation or order issued under this subchapter, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this subchapter or by any permit, rule, regulation, or order issued under this subchapter, shall upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000.00 or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or by both. C. Continuation of the Expired General Permit If this permit is not reissued or replaced prior to the expiration date, it will be administratively continued in accordance with 3 V.S.A. § 814(b) and remain in force and effect. Any permittee who was granted permit coverage prior to the expiration date will automatically remain covered by the continued permit until the earlier of. 1. Reissuance or replacement of this permit, at which time a permittee must comply with the Notice of Intent conditions of the new permit to maintain authorization to discharge; or 2. Issuance of an individual permit for your discharges; or 3. A formal permit decision by the Agency not to reissue this general permit, at which time a permittee must seek coverage under an alternative general permit or an individual permit. D. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity Not a Defense It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. E. Duty to Mitigate A permittee must take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit that has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. F. Duty to Provide Information A permittee must provide any new information that is requested to determine compliance with this permit or other information. G. Other Information Page 37 of 45 If a permittee becomes aware that it has failed to submit any relevant facts in its Notice of Intent or submitted incorrect information in the Notice of Intent or in any other report to the Secretary, it must promptly submit such facts or information. H. Signatory Requirements All Notices of Intent, reports, certifications, or required information submitted to the Agency, or that this permit requires be maintained shall be signed by a principal executive officer, ranking elected official or other duly authorized employee consistent with 40 CFR § 122.22(b) and certified as follows: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." I. Property Rights The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege, nor does it authorize any injury to private property nor any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations. J. Proper Operation and Maintenance A permittee must at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit and with the conditions of the S WMP. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. Proper operation and maintenance requires the operation of backup or auxiliary facilities or similar systems, installed only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. K. Inspection and Entry A permittee shall allow the Secretary or his or her authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the Secretary) upon the presentation of credentials and at reasonable times to: 1. Enter the premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; Page 38 of45 2. Have access to and copy at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities or equipment (including monitoring and control equipment) practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the CWA, any substances or parameters at any location. L. Permit Actions This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The fling of a request for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition. M. Permit Transfers An authorization to discharge may be transferred by submitting a notice of transfer to the Secretary. The Secretary may require modification or revocation and reissuance of a permittee's coverage under this general permit to change the name of the permittee and incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the Act. The notice shall be submitted at least thirty (30) days prior to the proposed date of transfer and shall include the following: 1. The permittee's name and address; 2. The name and address of the prospective permittee; 3. The name and daytime telephone number of the individual currently responsible for overseeing the administration of this permit; 4. The proposed date of transfer; and 5. A statement signed by the prospective permittee, stating that: a) The conditions of the operations that contribute to, or affect, the discharge will not be materially different; b) The prospective permittee has read and is familiar with the terms of the permit and agrees to comply with all the terms and conditions of the permit, and; Page 39 of 45 c) The prospective permittee has adequate funding or other means to effect compliance with all the terms of the permit. N. Anticipated Noncompliance A permittee shall give advance notice to the Agency of any planned changes in the permitted small MS4 or activity that may result in noncompliance with this permit. O. State Environmental Laws 1. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve a permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable State law or regulation under authority preserved by Section 510 of the Act. 2. No condition of this permit releases a permittee from any responsibility or requirements under other environmental statutes or regulations. P. Severability The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit shall not be affected thereby. Q. Procedures for Modification and Revocation After notice and opportunity for public hearing this permit may be modified in accordance with General Permit Rules Section 13.12 C.7. The Secretary reserves the right to revoke authorization to discharge under this general permit in accordance with General Permit Rules, Section 13.12 C.6. R. Requiring an Individual Permit or an Alternative General Permit 1. Request by the Secretary. The Secretary may require any person authorized by this permit to apply for and/or obtain either an individual NPDES permit or an alternative NPDES general permit in accordance with Agency's General Permit Rules, Section 13.12 D. Any interested person may petition the Secretary to take action under this paragraph. Where the Secretary requires an application for an individual NPDES permit, the Secretary will notify the entity in writing that a permit application is required. This notification shall include a brief statement of the reasons for this decision, an application form, a statement setting a deadline for filing the application, and a statement that on the effective date of issuance or denial of the individual NPDES permit or the alternative general permit as it applies to the individual permittee, coverage under this general permit shall automatically terminate. Applications must be submitted to the Secretary. The Page 40 of 45 Secretary may grant additional time to submit the application upon request of the applicant. If an individual NPDES permit application is not submitted in a timely manner as required by the Secretary under this paragraph, then the applicability of this permit is automatically terminated at the end of the day specified by the Secretary for application submittal. 2. Request by permittee. Any discharger authorized by this permit may request to be excluded from the coverage of this permit by applying for an individual permit. In such cases, an individual application must be submitted to the Secretary with reasons supporting the request. The request may be granted by issuance of any individual permit or an alternative general permit if the reasons cited are adequate to support the request. S. General Permit Termination. When an individual NPDES permit is issued to a discharger otherwise subject to this permit, or a permittee is authorized to discharge under an alternative NPDES general permit, the applicability of this permit to the individual NPDES permittee is automatically terminated on the effective date of the individual permit or the date of authorization of coverage under the alternative general permit, whichever the case may be. When an individual NPDES permit is denied to an operator otherwise subject to this permit or the operator is denied for coverage under an alternative NPDES general permit, the applicability of this permit to the individual NPDES permittee is automatically terminated on the date of such denial, unless otherwise specified by the Secretary. T. Limitation Nothing in this permit shall be construed as having relieved, modified, or in any manner affected the permittee's on -going obligation to comply with all other federal, state or local statues, regulations or directives applicable to the permittee in the operation of the permittee's activities, nor does it relieve the permittee of the obligation to obtain all other necessary state, local and federal permits. VII. DEFINITIONS All definitions contained in Section 502 of the Act and 40 CFR 122 shall apply to this permit and are incorporated herein by reference. For convenience, simplified explanations of some regulatory/statutory definitions have been provided, but in the event of a conflict, the definition found in federal or state statute or regulation takes precedence. 1. "Agency" means the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources 2. "Best Management Practices (BMPs)" means schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent Page 41 of 45 or reduce the pollution of waters of the State and waters of the United States. BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage. 3. "Control Measure" as used in this permit, refers to any Best Management Practice or other method used to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters of the State and waters of the United States. 4. "CWA" or The Act means the Clean Water Act (formerly referred to as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act or Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972) Pub. L. 92-500, as amended Pub. L. 95-217, Pub. L. 95- 576, Pub. L. 96-483 and Pub. L. 97-117, 33 U. S. C. 1251 et. seq. Discharge, when used without a qualifier, refers to discharge of a pollutant as defined at 40 CFR 122.2. 5. "Designer" means any person whose qualifications are acceptable to the Secretary. 6. "EPA" means the United States Environmental Protection Agency. 7. "Flow restoration targets" means the high and low flow targets as stated in the stormwater TMDLs for Allen Brook, Bartlett Brook, Centennial Brook, Englesby Brook, Indian Brook, Moon Brook, Morehouse Brook, Munroe Brook, Potash Brook, Rugg Brook, Stevens Brook, and Sunderland Brook 8. "Illicit Connection" means any man-made conveyance connecting an illicit discharge directly to a municipal separate storm sewer. 9. "Illicit Discharge" is defined at 40 CFR 122.26(b) (2) and refers to any discharge to a municipal separate storm sewer that is not entirely composed of stormwater, except discharges authorized under an NPDES permit (other than the NPDES permit for discharges from the small MS4) and discharges resulting from fire fighting activities. 10. "MEP" is an acronym for "Maximum Extent Practicable", and refers to the requirement set forth in 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. 1342(p)(3)(B)(iii) that permits for discharges from municipal storm sewers include controls to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices, control techniques and system, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions as the Secretary determines appropriate for the control of such pollutants. A discussion of MEP as it applies to small MS4s is found at 40 CFR 122.34(a). 11. "MS4" is an acronym for "Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System" and is used to refer to a Large, Medium, or Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. Page 42 of 45 The term is used to refer to either the system operated by a single entity or a group of systems within an area that are operated by multiple entities. 12. "Municipal Separate Storm Sewer" is defined at 40 CFR 122.26(b) (8) and means a conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains): (i) Owned or operated by a State, city, town, borough, county, parish, district, association, or other public body (created by or pursuant to State law) having jurisdiction over disposal of sewage, industrial wastes, stormwater, or other wastes, including special districts under State law such as a sewer district, flood control district or drainage district, or similar entity, or a designated and approved management agency under Section 208 of the CWA that discharges to waters of the State and waters of the United States; (ii) Designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater; (iii) Which is not a combined sewer; and (iv) Which is not part of a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) as defined at 40 CFR 122.2. 13. "NOI" is an acronym for Notice of Intent to be covered by this permit and is the mechanism used to register for coverage under a general permit. 14. "Non-traditional small MS4" means a subdivision of a state or local government that owns or operates an MS4, including the University of Vermont, the Burlington International Airport and the Vermont Agency of Transportation. 15. "Pollutant" means dredged spoil, solid waste, incinerator residue, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, radioactive materials, heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, sand, cellar dirt and industrial, municipal, and agricultural waste discharged into water. This term does not mean (A) "sewage from vessels" within the meaning of section 1322 of the Clean Water Act; or (B) water, gas, or other material which is injected into a well to facilitate production of oil or gas, or water derived in association with oil or gas production and disposed of in a well, if the well used either to facilitate production or for disposal purposes is approved by authority of the State in which the well is located, and if such State determines that such injection or disposal will not result in the degradation of ground or surface water resources. 16. "Pollutant of concern" means a pollutant which causes or contributes to a violation of a water quality standard, including a pollutant which is identified as causing an impairment in a State's 303(d) list. 17. "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources. 18. "Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System" or "Small MS4" is defined at 40 CFR 122.26(b) (16) and refers to all separate storm sewers that are owned or operated by the United States, a State, city, town, borough, county, parish, district, association, or other public body (created by or pursuant to State law) having Page 43 of 45 jurisdiction over disposal of sewage, industrial wastes, stormwater, or other wastes, including special districts under State law such as a sewer district, flood control district or drainage district, or similar entity, or a designated and approved management agency under Section 208 of the CWA that discharges to waters of the State and waters of the United States, but is not defined as a large or medium municipal separate storm sewer system. This term includes systems similar to separate storm sewer systems in municipalities, such as systems at military bases, large hospital or prison complexes, and highways and other thoroughfares. The term does not include separate storm sewers in very discrete areas, such as individual buildings. 19. "Stormwater" is defined at 40 CFR 122.26(b) (13),and means stormwater runoff, snowmelt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage. 20. "Stormwater Management Program" or "SWMP" refers to a comprehensive program to manage the quality of stormwater discharged from the municipal separate storm sewer system. 21. "VTrans" means the Vermont Agency of Transportation. 22. "Waters of the State" means all waters as defined in 10 V.S.A: § 1251. 23. "Waters of the United States" means all waters defined in 40 C.F.R. Section 122.2. 24. "Wetlands" means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a. prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. VIII. RIGHTS TO APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the names of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at Page 44 of 45 www.vermontiudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (802)828-1660. This permit is valid upon signing and shall remain in effect for five years from the date of signing. I I By; _ David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Date I I /,Y- / t Page 45 of 45 Permit Number SP- CITE' OF SOUTH BURL,INGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) oTH A F SovTH v�2ui✓67Dh/ 6 t75' .vacs ST, So ByY/�n� � 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) j u .� { 1 `7 7 D No ©a) ,, - y - 1 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) b�R�l�1Pl.�N6 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): _ 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) (J�--7 6 0 Q 5�7�- 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) �' � �� 6 ©y��.,, � c.... f Y ✓r c.t t�k Ara L � G e, R.c Gn.. a �z m., �r�_,F)s �eS�d,rS � k b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of ea h new use and existing uses to remain) /L A/0e s Pc[Ch_D-i' ad 1�l0Na1 dA.i%., c) Total building square footage n property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) ck� /-n L, d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) /Vb � /o L,., e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to .remain)_ f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 90 g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed -% / sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing _____,_% / sq. ft. Proposed _% / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing -% / sq. ft. Proposed % sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 0 b) Landscaping: $ 6 D c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Lk `YPPett'`, FA 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 0AJ i)l 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 4f �D5 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) k35 O�s�f S7. - VEVE As©uu. S �� � �� b� • -I#,� � — Coo p� pp '�-101 c�-� h q 5 � L C,� fZa�p�, 6uk J 0 VT- 1I\9feai-,a'n Su'✓lcesti InC, w�//06i5 ?45s00Av-J7to P r PbM J-t LL /-4-0 C-DlN. , LLC- 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. .�✓ a7,14 �`.�ri► Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: `1 a REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: 4? Con 4 EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) o Survey data (distance and acreage) o Contours (existing and finished) o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways o Zoning boundaries o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) o Location of septic tanks (if applicable) o Location of any easements o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard a North arrow o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ❑ Site Plan $ 185* ❑ Amended Site Plan $ 1851- ❑ Administrative Site Plan $ 85* * Includes $10.00 recording fee �__� I �._ 1 � ;� �;.w._._ -� , � ���;..� �` MILLENNIUM CORPORATE PARK BLDG.0 18400 NE UNION HILL ROAD REDMOND, WA 98052 PERFORMANCE BOND Bond 6089265 KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, Freihofer Sales Company Inc. dba Bouyea-Fassetts 522 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12203 (hereinafter called the Principal), as Principal, and SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Washington (hereinafter called the Surety), as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street, S Burlington, VT 05403 , (hereinafter called the Obligee), in the sum of Four Thousand Fifty and 00/100 ($ 4,050.00 ) Dollars, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we, the said Principal and the said Surety, bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Signed and sealed this 15th day of November 2000 WHEREAS, said Principal has entered into a Contract with said Obligee, dated , for to insure proper landscaping in accordance with the terms and conditions of said Contract, which is hereby referred to and made part hereof as if fully set forth herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly keep, do and perform each and every, all and singular, the matters and things in said contract set forth and specified to be by said Principal kept, done and performed, at the times and in the manner in said contract specified, or shall pay over, make good and reimburse to the above named Obligee, all loss and damage which said Obligee may sustain by reason of failure or default on the part of said Principal so to do, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise shall remain in full force and effect. NO SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING by the Obligee to recover on this bond shall be sustained unlec�l'tfle � nme be commenced within two (2) years following date on which Principal ceased work on said Contract. , Freihofer Sales Company Inc. dba Bouyea-Fassetts B Z�/Y - --- Principal �"" / -- SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA By 4xetl Ana W. Oliveras, Attas`ney-in-Fact—r; S-0757/SAEF 10/99 0 Registered trademark of SAFECO Corporation. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ANNEXED INSTRUMENT State of New York County of New York On November 14, 2000 before me personally came, Ana W Oliveras to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and day that he/she resides in New York; that he/she is Attorney -in -Fact of Safeco Insurance Company of America the corporation described in and which executed the within instrument; that he/she knows the seal of said corporation, that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that he/she signed his/her name thereto by like order; and that the liabilities of said corporation do not exceed its assets as ascertained in the manner provided by law. KIMBERLY A. BRUNO Notary Public, State of New York No. 31.4909995 quer,fied in New York County Commission Expires November 9,1991 Commission Expires Notary Sign tur S A F E CO, ) POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: )AFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA HOME OFFICE: SAFECO PLAZA SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98185 No. 7536 That SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, each a Washington corporation, does each heret appoint *************JEREMY H. WILDER; MIGDALIA OTERO; SHIRLEY DEWELY; BEVERLY WOOLFORD; KELLY R. BRATTON; THERESA GIRALDO; VINCENT MOY ANA W. OLIVERAS; TRACEY WATSON; SHEILAH McGUCKIN; KIMBERLY A. BRUNO; JENNIFER CALDARELLA; ROBYN WALSH; TERRY ANN GONZALES- SELMAN;PAULA YIP-YING; New York, New York*****+...*.**.*****«**.**.*.**.****..*..**..*+.*.....*«*.*:.**....+*■*.*«.«.......*..«.***.*.*.*...**.*******, its true and lawful attorney(s)-in-fact, with full authority to execute on its behalf fidelity and surety bonds or undertakings and other documents of a similar charact, issued in the course of its business, and to bind the respective company thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA have each executed ar attested these presents this 5th day of May , 1999 R.A. PIERSON, SECRETARY W. RANDALL STODDARD, PRESIDENT CERTIFICATE Extract from the By -Laws of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA: "Article V, Section 13. - FIDELITY AND SURETY BONDS ... the President, any Vice President, the Secretary, and any Assistant Vice President appointed for th purpose by the officer in charge of surety operations, shall each have authority to appoint individuals as attomeys-in-fact or under other appropriate titles with authority execute on behalf of the company fidelity and surety bonds and other documents of similar character issued by the company in the course of its business... On a instrument making or evidencing such appointment, the signatures may be affixed by facsimile. On any instrument conferring such authority or on any bond undertaking of the company, the seal, or a facsimile thereof, may be impressed or affixed or in any other manner reproduced; provided, however, that the seal shall r be necessary to the validity of any such instrument or undertaking." Extract from a Resolution of the Board of Directors of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA adopted July 28, 1970. "On any certificate executed by the Secretary or an assistant secretary of the Company setting out, (i) The provisions of Article V, Section 13 of the By -Laws, and (ii) A copy of the power-of-attomey appointment, executed pursuant thereto, and (iii) Certifying that said power-of-attomey appointment is in full force and effect, the signature of the certifying officer may be by facsimile, and the seal of the Company may be a facsimile thereof." I, R.A. Pierson, Secretary of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, do hereby certify that I foregoing extracts of the By -Laws and of a Resolution of the Board of Directors of these corporations, and of a Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto, are true correct, and that both the By -Laws, the Resolution and the Power of Attorney are still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the facsimile seal of said corporation this PACE COMP\ $ MV%ATE SEAL y SEAL T s x al 1953 d' oil WAS�� �dr�aw�a,��� 151—Tk— day of .OP,'� , 2000 R.A. PIERSON, SECRETARY S-0974/SAEF 7198 ® Registered trademark of SAFECO Corpors 5/5/99 Fa SAFECOO� SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA FINANCIAL STATEMENT — DECEMBER 31, 1999 Assets Cash and Bank Deposits ....................................... $ (22,345,422) *Bonds — U.S. Government ................................. 143,120,961 *Other Bonds......................................................... 1,706,631,049 *Stocks................................................................... 674,809,630 Real Estate............................................................ 38,368,257 Agents' Balances or Uncollected Premiums ........ 322,635,030 Accrued Interest and Rents .................................. 35,961,740 Other Admitted Assets ......................................... 346,951,287 Total Admitted Assets .................................. $ 3,246,132,532 co G�V P?0 4�F per„ o SEAL N � �r�lf OF WAS Liabilities Unearned Premiums ............................................... $ 590,630,668 Reserve for Claims and Claims Expense ................ 1,342,809,934 Funds Held Under Reinsurance Treaties ................ 410,511 Reserve for Dividends to Policyholders ................. 8,495,575 Additional Statutory Reserve ................................. — Reserve for Commissions, Taxes and Other Liabilities ................................................ 498,468,908 Total............................................................... $2,440,815,596 Capital Stock ............................. $ 5,000,000 Paid in Surplus ........................... 11,139,940 Unassigned Surplus ................... 789,176,996 Surplus to Policyholders .............................. 805,316,936 Total Liabilities and Surplus ............................... $3,246,132,532 * Bonds are stated at amortized or investment value; Stocks at Association Market Values. Securities carried at $121,297,719 are deposited as required by law. 1, MICHAEL C. PETERS, senior vice president of SAFECO Insurance Company of America, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true, and correct statement of the Assets and Liabilities of said Corporation, as of December 31, 1999, to the best of my knowledge and belief. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Corporation at Seattle, Washington, this ist day of March, 2000. Senior Vice President S• 1262 3100 ® A registered trademark of SAFECO Corporation. 0 SAFECO PERFORMANCE BOND SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA HOME OFFICE- SAFECO PLAZA SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98185 Bond No. 5857768 KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, miyea Fa�sc_ett_c, Inc_ (hereinafter called the Principal), as Principal, and General Insurance Company of America, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Washington (hereinafter called the Surety), as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto rity of Snuth Riirlinaton , (hereinafter called the Obligee), One Thousand Four Hundred Forty and in the sum of 00/100 ($1,"Om ) Dollars, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we, the said Principal and the said Surety, bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Signed with our seals and dated this 16th day of January 19__"_. WHEREAS, said Principal has entered into a Contract with said Obligee, dated for Plant 6 8'-10' White Pines as shown on Drawing (Site Plan) in accordance with the terms and conditions of said Contract, which is hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly keep, do and perform each and every, all and singular, the matters and things in said contract set forth and specified to be by said Principal kept, done and performed, at the times and in the manner in said contract specified, or shall pay over, make good and reimburse to the above named Obligee, all loss and damage which said Obligee may sustain by reason of failure or default on the part of said Principal so to do, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise shall remain in full force and effect. NO SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING by the Obligee to recover on this bond shall be sustained unless the same be commenced within two (2) years following date on which Principal ceased work on said Contract. Bouyea Fassetts, Inc. Principal e POWER GENERA INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA INSURANCE OF ATTORNEY HOME OFFICE: SAFECO PLAZA COMPANY OF AMERICA AZA .ClECi�O SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98185 No. 9376 KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: That SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, each a Washington corporation, does each hereby appoint •ounTHERESA GIRALDO; VINCENT MOY; MARIAGRACE EGAN; WILLIAM J. PATERNO; CATHERINE ROSANO; ANA W. OLIVERAS, New York, New yOrk.NNNNNMNN■11MNMMt■•M■■M■■�•■■M■■MMMMNx MM NNNMNNNN NNN MNMNMMN NMMNMNMMNM its true and lawful attorney(s)-in-fact. with full authority to execute on its behalf fidelity and surety bonds or undertakings and other documents of a similar character issued in the course of its business. and to bind the respective company thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA have each executed and attested these presents this 15th day of March , 19 95 CERTIFICATE Extract from the By -Laws of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA: "Article V. Section 13. - FIDELITY AND SURETY BONDS ... the President, any Vice President, the Secretary, and any Assistant Vice President appointed for that purpose by the officer in charge of surety operations. shall each have authority to appoint individuals as attorneys -in -fact or under other appropriate titles with authority to execute on behalf of the company fidelity and surety bonds and other documents of similar character issued by the company in the course of its business ... On any instrument making or evidencing such appointment, the signatures may be affixed by facsimile. On any instrument conferring such authority or on any bond or undertaking of the company, the seal, or a facsimile thereof, may be impressed or affixed or in any other manner reproduced: provided, however, that the seal shall not be necessary to the validity of any such instrument or undertaking." Extract from a Resolution of the Board of Directors of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA adopted July 28. 1970. "On any certificate executed by the Secretary or an assistant secretary of the Company setting out. (i) The provisions of Article V. Section 13 of the By -Laws, and (ii) A copy of the power -of -attorney appointment, executed pursuant thereto, and (iii) Certifying that said power -of -attorney appointment is in full force and effect. the signature of the certifying officer may be by facsimile, and the seal of the Company may be a facsimile thereof." I. R. A. Pierson. Secretary of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, do hereby certify that the foregoing extracts of the By -Laws and of a Resolution of the Board of Directors of these corporations. and of a Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto. are true and correct. and that both the By -Laws, the Resolution and the Power of Attorney are still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the facsimile seal of said corporation this day of N 16 1996 19 S-974/EP 1/93 0 Registered trademark of SA=ECO Corporation. ACKNOWLEDGM= OF ANNE= INSTRUM M STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK On this 16th day of -January , 19 95 before me personally came Catherine Rosano, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he/she is an Attorney -in -Fact of the GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, and knows the corporate seal thereof; that the seal affixed to said annexed instrument is such corporate seal, and was thereto affixed by authority of the Power of Attorney of said Company, of which a Certified Copy is hereto attached, and that he/she signed said Instrument as an Attorney -in -Fact of said Company by like authority. TRACEY 0_ WATSON NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Now York No. 01 WA5019877 Qualified in icings County Certificate Filed in Now York Co Commission Expires Nov.1, 19 Acknowledge and Sworn to before me on the date above written "Aa GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA FINANCIAL STATEMENT — DECEMBER 31, 1994 SAFEM Assets Liabilities Cash and Bank Deposits ....................................... S 3.932,891 Unearned Premiums ............................................... 5 290.> 17.931 *Bonds — U.S Government .................................. 92.664.799 Reserve for Claims and Claims Expense................ 753.460.5 I 1 Reserve for Dividends to Policyholders ................. 10.660,660 *Other Bond;.......................................................... 1,082,441.585 Additional Statutory Reserve ................................. 57.593 *Stocks................................................................... 293,454,623 Reserve for Commissions, Taxes and Other Liabilities .......... .................................... 91,295.565 RealEstate............................................................ 18,250.383 Total .............................................................. S 1,146.022,200 Agents' Balances or Uncollected Premiums ........ 137,680,836 Capital Stock ............................. S 5.000,(X)0 Accrued Interest and Rents .................................. 28,175,475 Paid in Surplus........................... 891,058 Other Admitted Assets ................................ I........ 36,009,844 Unassigned Surplus ................... 540.697,1 18 Surplus to Policyholders ............................. 546,588,176 Total .Admitted Assets .................................. SI,692.610.436 Total Liabilities and Surplus ............................... S1,692,610.436 CE COyPIf CORPORATE �� * Bonds are stated at amortized or investment value: Stocks at Association Market Value, WSEAL Z Securities carried at S 107.1 10.943 are deposited as required b} law. x `9 I923 of wash�o�°o 1. PHILIP A STEPHENS. senior , ice president of General Insurance Compan\ of America, do hereby certify that the foregt�in 11 a Ifue.:,nd correct statement of the Assets and Liabilities of said Corporation, as of December 31, 1994, to the best of m� knowledge and hclict IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Corporation at Seattle. Washington. this I st das of !starch. 1995. Senior Vic President S•885 3 95 ® Registered trademark of SAFECO Co,porx or. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Gee m 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Existing Uses on Property (including description aid size of each separate us b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 94 ge c as :Let ev-c. i �/!o„ LIS Ay ce*sf c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): G� g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing Proposed b) Overall (building, parking, tside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed 1 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): c o .s ,Sr,i "i-- 0-." f -v '5 -tv /"e - re% 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): /vim b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): It c) P.M. Peak hour (in and out): 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 11 3 1 Z REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: rM JLJ Complete 11 Director, Planning & Zoning Incomplete Director of Pl11__�nin6& Zoning or Designee (Apfrmsp) 1/3 EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. • Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) • Survey data (distance and acreage) • Contours (existing and finished) • Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations • Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping • Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways • Zoning boundaries • Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) • Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) • Location of septic tanks (if applicable) • Location of any easements • Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard • North arrow • Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date • Exterior lighting details (must be down casting and shielded) • Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) • Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations • If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE New Application $ 60.00* Amendment $ 35.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee (Apfrmsp) f PLAi�Ir�ZNG CiiMiiIaSION AUGUST 12, 1980 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, August 12, 1980 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 1175 Williston Road Members Present !idney Poger, Chairman; Ernest Levesque, George Mona, Peter Jacob, Kirk Woolery Members Absent James Ewing, Robert Walsh Others Present David Spitz, Planner; James Lamphere, Xarcel Bouchard, Paul Farrar, Rob Eley, Free Press; John & Yvonne Benedict, Teresa and John Beatty, I`_ary Williams, Thelma & Elliot Lahoue, Maureen Hillihan, Alice ,'heel, Linda Carsno, Larry & B. Gerlack, Doug Schner, Carlotte & George Hart, Jacqueline Germain, Kalchoe, R.W. Eastmen, Wilber Hurtubise, James & Shirley Menard, Emery Victory, Daisey Trappier, Joanna DuBois, George and i-Iary DeForge, Michael Ram, Peter Coff rin, Carl Cobb, Richard Trudell, P. Minch, Charles Shea, Molly Coley :inutes of July 22, 1980 On page 5, under the application of Lloyd Kranz, it should be noted that Ir. Jacob removed himself from the discussion due to a possible conflict of interest. Also on that page, in front of the last paragraph, the following sentence should be added: "Llir. Poger said that unless the layout were changed, he would vote against the proposal because it is one of the ugliest he has ever seen." Mr. Woolery moved to approve the July 22, 1980 minutes as amended and Mr. Jacob seconded the motion, which passed with Mr. Mona abstaining. Revised site plan review of new municipal buildin{- on Dorset Street Mr. Lamphere showed the plan as originally approved and as it is now. One entrance has been located directly across from the high school parkine. lot and the circulation works better now, he said. It will still work if the firing range and carports are added. Drainage and other utilities are unchanged. The reduced parking on the municipal side of the building still conforms with ordinance requirements. Regarding the pedestrian walkway, Mr. Farrar, Chairman of the City Council, stated that if it became necessary later, protective devices would be installed. The sidewalk will be added in the future, although Mr. Poger noted that the Commission had required others to construct sidewalks or bond for them. Lamphere said that the city would pay for the sidewalk, and could put it in any time. 1r. Spitz noted that a strip of land had been set aside for the walk. Mr. Farrar said he understood that the sidewalk was part of the project, but that it would be added when Dorset Street is recuilt. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan of the City,- of :south Burlington for a new zunicival buildinE containing City Hall Police and Fire De::art ent offices, as de:icted on a plan entitled "South EurlinEton ;,.unicipal Center," dated E 1 80 and prepared by Wiemann- LamDhere Architects, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Stipulations frcm the a:,:roval dated April 29, 1950 regarding a potential 2. PLANNING =74ISSION AUGUST 12, 1980 access to the adjacent Hurley property and a pedestrian crossing light across Dorset Street shall remain in effect. 2. The future sidewalk depicted on the plan shall be constructed at the time of the widening or upgrading of Dorset Street. I++Ir. Jacob seconded the motion and all voted aye. Application by George and Norman DeForg�e for final plat approval of a 14 unit condominium project entitled Sunrise Terrace on Quarry Hill Road Mr. Trudell showed the original plan, which had two entrances to Quarry Hill Road and a flat grade. Because of the cost to remove all that ledge, the project has been changed. It has been raised 8', which still puts it 2' under the covenant requirement, and the entrance has been made a single one, with a 79 grade up to the units. The parking lot is 12' above the road. The site layout and building configuration remain the same. Water was to come from the East Terrace Extension, but they could not get adequate fire flows, so it will now come from Quarry Hill Road. Mr. Trudell commented on the points in the City tanager's 8/11 memo. They plan to run the sewer service out the back of the units, and they will maintain it, which the Manager agreed to. Regarding sodding the ditches, Mr. Trudell felt that would not be needed on the inside of the road curve because there will be very little water flow and the I:anager agreed. tr. Poger felt the inside should be sodded also, and Mr. Trudell agreed to do it. Mr. Trudell said drainage would be intercepted before it reached Quarry Hill Road. Regarding curbing, he said he did not feel it was necessary because this is a private drive. Mr. Mona was concerned about sight distance for cars coming up the entrance drive. At the inside of the curve there is a built-up area which he felt would restrict the vision of drivers-6ntering the project and prevent them from seeing cars exiting down the hill. There was concern expressed about cars drifting into the wrong lane as they came around that sharp turn,* especially if they could not see if another car was coming. Mr. Trudell felt they would be able to see, and he noted that the road was 24' wide. Mr. Spitz said sight -distance and safety would be checked. i-Ir. Poger said it could be chacked now or built as proposed and checked then, at which time it could be changed if it were not safe. Ns. Trudell had no problem with that, because he felt it would be safe. Points 5 and 6 on the 8/11 memo have been done, as has 7. The question of a single access to the development was. discussed. This project will add 14 units to the 78 existing on Quarry Hill Road. There have been two possible other access points mentioned, but Mr. Spitz said the one to Gaynes was not legal and the one to East Terrace was questionable. He also was not sure that would be a good place to add access to this area. The applicants have submitted a traffic report, done by Mr. Trudell. The report finds that level of service A can be maintained at the intersection with Quarry Hill Road and that no traffic light is needed. hr. Mona agreed with this, but noted that the next developer in this area would have to face the issue of a dual entrance. The Commission was satisfied with the Quarry Hill access. I4r. Spitz will look into the entrance road and the curve in more detail. i:r. Trudell agreed to build the road and the built-up area as they wanted to and then have the City Engineer or someone else look at it. If it is all ri€ht, then it will be planted, and if not, it will be removed. The Commission considered arrows to show people the proper way to drive around the middle island, but decided they were not necessary. :r. Spitz said the first part of Quarry Hill Road had not been accented by i d �r jy�yry, ,ntl,��! �J r J w l �,t, •� l l State of Vermont Department of Fish and Game Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Water Resources Environmental Board Division of Environmental Engineering Division of Protection Natural Resources Conservation Council City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road South Burlington VT 05402 Dear Gentlemen: AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Montpelier, Vermont 05602 R F r F \I t o DIVISION OF PROTECTION SEP 8 1980 111 West Street MANAGER'S UFFICL_ Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 CITY So. BURLING-C ON September 3, 1980 Application ft PB-4-0533 On behalf of the Protection Division of the Agency of Environmental Conservation, I acknowledge receipt of your application for construction of a 26,000,square feet municipal building to. house meeting rooms, offices, police and fire departments, located on Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont The application was received by this office on September 3,1980 You will be notified promptly of any decisions made on this appli- cation. Z ceL�', rle Wilcox i Secretary Division of Protection /C--Planning Commission PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 15, 1980 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, April 15, 1980 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 1175 Williston Road Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; Ernest Levesque (late), George Mona, Robert Walsh, Kirk Woolery, James Ewing Member Absent Peter Jacob Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Carl Lisman, Steve Page, Rob Eley, Free Press; Robert and Edwina Cronin, William Moores, Barbara Stevens, Nancy and Dale Klein, Nancy and James McClary, William Szymanski, City Manager; Lowell Krassner, Paul Farrar and Martin Paulsen, City Council; Elaine Isaacson, Diane Geerkin, Dennis Webster Minutes of April 8, 1980 Mr. Mona felt that a situation similar to the one last week regarding the minutes had arisen, regarding the Gregory approval. He has since gone by the property several times and he noted that at the last meeting a passing comment had been made by the applicant that his lot might not count as one of the 4 after development of which the Commission would review traffic. Mr. Mona wanted to clarify that the 4 lots discussed in stipulation #10 on page 3 meant any 4 lots, and that no lot was exempt. Mr. Poger asked that a copy of these minutes with the clarification be sent to Mr. Gregory. Mr. Woolery moved to accept the April 8. 1980 minutes as clarified. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. Mr. Levesque arrived at this point. Site plan review of the/new municipal building"bn Dorset_Stree Mr. Poger stated that in his 10 years on the Commission this was the first time the City had come before the board to ask permission to do anything. He noted that it was nice to see them. Mr. Levesque felt the State statutes were not up to date on the review of municipal buildings, since they did not mandate review of energy conservation. He felt the building should consider energy, especially solar power. Since the architect was not present yet, it was decided to postpone this item and go on to the neat one. Continuation of public hearing on application by the Glenwood Corporation for revised final plat approval for cluster J (20 units) of phase 2 of the Stonehedge development Mr. Page noted that the applicants had met with the City Engineer last week regarding the sewer question and that the Engineer's 4/11 memo was the solution to the sewer questions. The applicant will agree to do the improvements set down in the memo. Mr. Page said that the sewer lines from cluster J would also be changed from what had been planned. At the last meetings, the main was to run north -south. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next Week's agenda items (2) Municipal Building According to State statute, Title 34VSA, Section 4409, municipal buildings may be regulated with respect only to "size, bulk, yards, courts, setbacks, height, density of buildings, off-street parking and loading facilities and landscaping or screening requirements" - i.e. the normal zoning and site plan criteria. Final site plans are being provided today, and the above items will be checked by Tuesday's meeting. One item of note - when the adjacent Hurley property was developed the Planning Commission made the following stipulation: "Access to the project from Dorset Street may be relocated at the City's expense, to a point north of, but within 100 feet of this property, when and if the abutting municipal property is developed. If such a change were to be made I would suggest that it be with concurrence of both Planning Commission and City Council. 1 'in light of recent discussions I feel it is important to comment further on which aspects of a PUD the Planning Commission has the power to review. Let me emphasize at the outset that these are my interpretations of the statutes only, and my comments in no way should be considered as a legal opinion. Relvelant statutes include State enabling legislation - Title 24, VSA, Sections 4407(3) Planned residential development and 4407(12) Planned unit development; and the local zoning ordinance - Sections 6.30 Residential Planned Unit Development and 12.002(A) General Standards. State enabling legislation (24VSA4407(3)) clearly state that PUDs shall consider the most appropriate layout in terms of land use: "The purpose of such authorization shall be to enable and encourage flexibility of design and development of land in such a manner as to promote the most appropriate use of land, to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities, and to preserve the natural and scenic qualities of the open lands of this state." In relation to the above land use criteria it is clear that the location of buildings is subject to review. The major issue in this application is whether the type and design of buildings may also be included as reviewable items. The only State reference (24VSA4407(3)(C)) to building type addresses the option for a mix of "varied types including one -family, two-family or multi- family construction." While this statement does not appear to extend to such considerations as townhouses vs. flats, it is possible that a liberally - minded local ordinance could interpret the State enabling legislation to allow review over such differences. 4/15/80 DHS STIPULATIONS AND/OR FACT FINDING SOUTH BURLINGTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING For the Site Plan application of the City of South Burlington for a new municipal building containing City Hall, Police and Fire Department officers, as depicted on a plan entitled "South Burlington Municipal Center," dated 4/10/80 and prepared by Wiemann Lamphere: Stipulations 1. An Additional fire hydrant shall be added to the southwest of the building. 2. The southerly access shall be relocated to serve both the municipal building and the adjacent Hurley property. The current access to the Hurley property shall be closed off. A 3 square foot directional sign for the Hurley office building may be permitted at the new entrance. 3. A plan of record, including landscaping details and access and fire hydrant revisions, shall be submitted. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: Apri.l_25, 1980 2X'_" Municipal Buildin I Several items have been addressed since last meeting. Entrances to-tlie high school across the street are now shown on the map.: The northerly police and fire entrance is shown about ten feet off -center from a high school entrance. Centering the access would result in a loss of a number of parking spaces. Since the new access is not supposed to be for the general public, centering is not crucial. Options for the southerly entrance are still being explored. It will be impossible to line up with the high school and to provide access to the adjacent Hurley property with only one access point. The number of parking spaces has been re-examined and appears sufficient for any projected use of the municipal building. A more likely occurence is that the municipal parking lot would be used for overflow high school parking. Location and possible construction of a pedestrian walkway and crossing light are being examined. Layout of drainage improvementsjbutnot complete engineering details, should be available for Tuesday's meeting. One additional fire hydrant may be required. On a municipal application such as this I would suggest that the Planning Commission indicate the conditions that it feels are important for proper use of the site. However, working out of details, such as for drainage, and deter- mining timing of improvements, such as access to the Burley property or a ped- estrian crossing light, should be left to the City Council and Administration based on budget and other considerations. I would recommend that site plan approval need not be held up while the City works out such matters. 3)( Champlain Oil._ Information required from last meeting has not yet been provided, b,rt 7 —nect it to be available by Tuesday's meeting. 4) Stonehedge. AtIthe end of the last meeting the Planning Commission requested that a motion be prepared to support the Commission's ability to review the appearance of the new units and their compatibility with existing units. The only section that I believe may be utilitzed is one of the general standards under which the Planning Connnission shall evaluate any proposed Planned Unit Development. (S,-c. 12.002(A)(7)): "Will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites or rare and ireplaceable natural area, and conforms to proposed pedestrian trail system." MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda Date: 2)p Building Municipal Build \) Several changes have been made to the site plan because of City budgetary constraints. Building has been reoriented and carports now are shown as future construction. Parking remains as before on the fire and police side; reduced from 75 to 51 spaces on the municipal office side. Access drive is now aligned with ligh school entrance. Pedestrian access and other stipulations need to remain in efect. 3) DeForge Condominiums Some revisions have had to be made to this project because of higher -than - anticipated blasting costs. The building layout and design is unchanged except that the entire structure has been moved 8 feet up the hill to reduce required blasting volumes. The building height still complies with covenant restrictions. The major change has been access - nCW a single access drive entering from the south instead of a looped driveway airectly in front of the building. The fire chief has accepted this plan since the buildings are still close enough to be served by fire trucks and hydrants from Quarry Hill Read. Applicant has submitted a traffic report (enclosed), as requested, and indicates that the intersection with Spear Street is currently operating at an acceptable level of service and will continue to do when traffic from this project is added. S Due to the lateness of the changes, complete detail plans have not been submitted and several items remain to be resolved. (1) Location of water lines so as to insure adequate water pressure for fire protection. (2) Engineering review by Bill Szymanski of blasting plans and changes to construction details. (3) Submission of legal documents verifying the applicant's rights to improve Quarry Hill Road and to convey same to the City. If any of these items are not resolved by Tuesday's meeting I would reconv end delay of final approval until after they are resolved. 5) Corporate Circle This preliminary plat review should focus on internal transportation issues. Appliacant has provided a traffic study (enclosed) and proposed rotary design. Additional information on external traffic issues, i.e. intersections with Dorset Street, Hinesburg Road, etc., can be provided at the next review stage. Preliminary review can also take place now on impact on City services and on general types of use for different areas of the development. The application will be presented according to the subdivision review PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 29, 1980 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, April 29, 1980 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 1175 Williston Road Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; Ernest Levesque, George Mona, Peter Jacob, Robert Walsh, James Ewing Member Absent Kirk Woolery Others Present David Spitz, Planner; William Szymanski, City Manager; James Lamphere, Paul Farrar, Tony Cairns, Dale and Nancy Klein, James McClary, Elaine Isaacson, Ted Olsen, Carl Lisman, Ernestine Moore, Steve Page, Steve Larose, Lowell Krassner Minutes of April 22, 1980 Mr. Jacob moved to approve the April 22, 1980 minutes and Mr. Mona seconded the motion, which carried with Mr. Poger abstaining. Continuation of site plan review of the new municipal building on Dorset Street Mr. Szymanski said the entrances to the school across the street had been shown and they would line up with the municipal building entrances. The entrance into the public parking lot had been moved north to line up, and another access point will be added south of that access to accomodate the stipulation regarding the office condominiums to the south of the new building. This southerly access will also be used as an exit from the parking lot. There will be some markings to direct cars in and out of these accesses. Cars wishing to turn right out of the lot will use the south exit. Mr. Szymanski said the accesses were 22' wide. Regarding drainage, Mr. Szymanski said two inlets had been added, one in the police parking lot and another behind the carport. Drainage will run south to the edge of the parking lot and then west to a settling basin near the Interstate. Mr. Levesque asked about a sidewalk, feeling that the city should put one in and connect it to the sidewalk for the apartments north of this location. He felt the sidewalk should be put in when and if the road was widened and Mr. Poger asked that some land be designated on the plan for a future sidewalk. Mr. Poger asked about provisions for pedestrian crossing of the road. Mr. Szymanski was not sure the need for a light at that point was very great now. He did not think the need would be there for a few years. Mr. Mona suggested having a sidewalk coming out of the front of the new building and heading directly east to the road. At -that point there could be a painted pedestrian crossing, and the sidewalk could begin again on the other side of the road. Mr. Walsh suggested a sign warning cars of pedestrians also. Mr. Szymanski said landscaping would meet the requirements. Mr. Ewing moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan applicatAbn of the City of South Burlington for a new municipal building containing City Hall, Police and Fire Department offices, as depicted on a plan entitled "South Burlington Municipal Center", last revised 4/29/80 an4_,pre24red by iiierann Lamphere, subject to the followinE_A!_pulations: 1. The southerly access shall be relocated to serve both the municipal 2. PLANNING COMISSION APRIL 29, 1980 building and to allow for connection to the adjacent Hurley property. The City .:shall construct the connecting access and shall close the current access to the Hurley property when and if traffic conditions warrant. 2. A second entrance to the municipal office parking lot shall be aligned with the southerly entrance to the high school The City shall install a pedestrian crossing light near those entrances when traffic conditions warrant. 3. Landscaping and drainage details and access revisions shall be submitted. 4. Land shall be set aside for a sidewalk fronting on Dorset Street and a_ sidewalk from the entrance of the municipal building to the street. A pedestrian crossing line shall be painted and appropriate signing and lighting erected. 5. All above revisions will be noted on the plan of record. Fir. Jacob seconded the motion and all were in favor. Continuation of site plan review of application by Champlain Oil Company for a convenience store and gas station on land owned by Dr. Barney on Shelburne Road at the Shelburne boundary F°.r. Cairns noted that the entrances across the street from this site had been added to the plan and the motel lined up with this entrance. He said the other question had been on the total per day traffic count, and he gave this information to Kr. Poger, who said that the estimate was 200 cars per day. Mr. Mona was concerned about creating another situation like Williston Road if the Commission allowed more and more places on Shelburne Road which created left turning traffic. Mr. Jacob felt the City Council, in its interim zoning hearings, had covered traffic and that the Commission should only be concerned with the interior layout. Mr. Poger felt that if the Commission saw a safety problem, they should discuss it, and if they did not, they should accept the Council's judgement. 11. Mr. Ewing noted that with 40' wide access points, the applicant could not control people who wanted to go in and out the same access. Mr. Mona felt that two curb cuts were appropriate for a gas station use, but he said that if the pumps were removed, it would be better to have only one. Mr. Cairns said that would be fine with him. He felt the only way to have control over the wide accesses was with signs, and said he planned to erect lighted signs and have painted arrows on the pavement. He went on to say that he believed, and so did the traffic engineer, that having this station here might ease the traffic at that point, because at heavy traffic times, people who need gas will be more inclined to buy it on the side of the road where they do not need to make 2 left turns. M.r. Levesque asked about turning the building the other way but he was told they could not do that because of the Velco right of way. Mr. Ewing moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Champlain Oil Company for a convenience store and gas station on land owned by Dr. Bernard Barney on Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "Ethan Allen Hart, Site Development - Plot Plan" last revised 25 80, prepared by Graphic Services, subject to the following stipulations: :, s 1. b landscaping bond of i1200 shall be provided prior to issuance cf the building. per=it. 2. Entrance and exit centerlines shall be alined with entrances to lauline'a__ PLANNING COMMISSION 3. APRIL 15, 1980 Ms. Barb Stevens asked about the existing foundations. These will be built upon, but will need new building permits. r:r. Walsh wondered if the units to be constructed on those foundations would be of the same design as the original. Mr. Lisman said the foundations were there before Glenwood had any intrest in the site. Mr. roger said that since there had been no request to change from the original plan for those foundations, they would have to be constructed in that shape in that location. Kr. Lisman added that unless the .applicant asked for a change, they had approval to build according to the approved design. Mr. Page noted that no elevations were ever submitted for the units. Mr. Spitz commented that the city had on file a plan of record from last March and it showed that the buildings were built as located on that plan with the possible exception that some of them might be separated by 28' instead of 30', which he had not checked out, but which would not be a major change anyway. It was noted that while the plans for the development had been changed, the changes had not been made without the proper approvals. Mr. le Clary objected to the series of changes. He felt this was a PUD and it should look like one thing. Mr. Walsh noted that on pg 24 of the Zoning Regulations, the last general standard for a PUD was "the objectives and purposes to be served" by it. He wanted to know how the proposed change affected the objectives and purposes of the PUD when it originally came before the Commission. Mr. Poger noted that this development might predate those 1974 regulations. Mr. Lisman said that Mr. Potter had received building permits for 92 units of this development in 1973. He added that the objectives and purposes of the PUD were no different, in the mind of the applicant, if J were built the way they are asking to build it. Mr. Krassner noted that esthetics were part of the general standards and he felt the Commission was being asked to change the esthetics here, for the neighborhood and the community as a whole. The McClarys' lawyer was at another meeting and they hoped he would arrive soon. Since it was 9:00, a recess was declared. When the meeting came back to order, the lawyer had still not arrived. The Commission discussed closing the hearing, noting that if needed, they could reopen it later for new information. Mr. Woolery noted that what the Commission had to discuss was how the change affected the character of the area and the specific issue of the 20 units in cluster J. Mr. Woolery moved to close the public hearing on the application of the Glenwood Corporation for revised final plat approval for cluster J of phase 2 of the Stonehedge development. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion, and it carried 6-0. Mr. Mona then moved to return to Item #f2 on the agenda, which was postponed this evening. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion and all were in favor. Site plan review of the new municipal building -;ion Dorset S Mr. Dennis Webster, of Wiemann-Lamphere, architects of the building, spoke to the Commission. He stated that the new building would be added to the existing fire station. The police station will be removed. The back portion of the site will not be used. Mr. Webster also noted that the existing station was built over the setback line from Dorset Street and said the new one would not be. Fire, police and municipal offices will be located in the new building. Mr. Webster said there would be two parking lots, one on each side of the building. The fire department requires 30 rarking spaces available at any time, so there will not be public parking in that lot. The primary public entrance to the building will be on the Routh. There will be a road connecting the two parking lots around the rear of the t--ilding for fire and -;olice vehicles. This will be one-way. r PLANNING COMMISSION 4. APRIL 15, 1980 It was noted that when the office condominiums to the south were built, the Commission asked that access for them be combined with access for the municipal offices. Mr. Webster said that could be done. Mr. Ewing felt that it would be all right to leave space for a frontage road to the property to the south. Access could then be shared later if there were traffic problems with the offices to the south. The Commission asked that the drives for the high school across the street be located on the plan. Pir. Woolery asked how many parking spaces were shown and was told that there were 75 public spaces. Mr. Webster said there could be two-way traffic between the rows of parking. There is room to expand both to the rear and to the south if more room is needed in the building. Mr. Poger asked that drainage and municipal services be addressed and he wanted to be sure the Fire Chief had seen the plan. The building will be accessible to the handicapped. It will have a total of 26,000 sq. ft. and will be designed so that more space can be added internally. The new building will be larger than the one presently housing the municipal offices. Mr. Krassner wondered if a traffic light were needed on Dorset Street for fire trucks, but Mr. Levesque assured him that there was not a problem with that. There is presently a flashing light there. Ms. Geerkin wondered about pedestrians crossing the road at night when there were evening meetings and all the spaces at the municipal offices were used. In that case, people would park at the high school and walk over. Fir. Szymanski said that could be discussed. Mr. Poger asked that drainage be reviewed. Mr. Mona suggested that the entrance to the public parking lot be at the south instead of the north aisle of parking, where it will be closer to the condominium land. Ms. Geerkin asked about passive solar heating in the building. Mr. Webster said the strategy here had been conservation. There are few windows and where there are windows, they face south and have an overhang. He noted that the areas which gain the most heat also lose the most and in a public building it is better to stress conservation, since no one person will be responsible for operating the system. There is a R value of 40 and there will be a 6-sided envelope of insulation at that R value. There may also be a heat sink in the basement. They hope to have domestic hot water heated through an active solar system. They hope to begin construction as soon as possible. The Commission asked that they have answers on the high school accesses, the parking lot entrance on the south aisle, the drainage system and possible retention pond, and pedestrian lighting for crossing the street. Other business Mr. Levesque asked about enforcement of the stipulations of McDonald's parking lot approval. He wanted to know when the first two parking areas just inside the entrance and exit to the lot would be eliminated as discussed. Mr. Poger directed Mr. Spitz to find out. Fir. 'foolery noted that Plywood Ranch had submitted a landscaping plan and he wondered when that would be put in. He also noted that they had told the Commission there would be no display of materials in front of the building, and there are such materials in front now. 'Mr. Levesque also noted that all the trees between this lot and the one to the west of it had been wiped out and he felt that the screening on the fence should go all around the fence, not be on just part of it. Mr. Mona asked about the Faster Plan and was told it was being edited and would be ready by the end of the month. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERVIONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 11, 2005 Kimberly Wilson Scott & Partners 20 Main Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: Site Plan Application #SP-05-36 Dear Ms. Wilson: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Administrative Officer on August 10, 2005 (effective August 1.0, 2005). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, 2zoulgh Planning & Zoning Assistant cc: Chief Douglas Brent Encl. Permit Number SP- d - ) l CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I) OI M OF�®R%Na ass own n eed, mailing address, phone and fax#) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) S6z5-L+ +- :FOL rt - Za MAC N >f =,cox Jusits (gEh Z76y 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone `& fax ft U NSOV1 . 5L0-0c + i�1APJt Za 1� St . 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5 75 12c r- P-t S-L , 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) F; �h 11'Cy-� fl C ;i/ /-1 a /] b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) P& I i ee Ciey �a 1 s oi► v� as 'i S c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 2'3. 300 5 F d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Z.l' t-e, l orb e,LA) or-ros e. 4�o ti, Z & Z Sta Z s Ex, re r> � , ck o(' -bib % rN c,4 ; � t � 1n t �' �aC i S-t • i t'e e Q e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) fl Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 2q p-vmy)vyPe, 7 flP' ce s-t" ►Mew C e� v�SS �t' a Cto >� Pec k-eA I " ok r-'av g) Other (li ean-y) other m�rmati�n per�a�tment/ to this application not specifically requestel above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Li. `I (p Ft. a) Building: Existing J , g % / 3 Zi �l z U sq. Proposed_ ° , sq. ft.cli�z�n b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 3j, $ % l 7 3i ozS sq. ft. Proposed 33 % l 71, 3D0 sq. ft. i av 3 c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 3g % / l 9% sq. ft. Proposed3$ SF % ! M sq. ft, d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 3, 2.D 0 sF * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ y 174 (oD0 b) Landscaping: $ r 2-, 771) c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC F-X/ST. Tb PIEH AI N a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: the a a H l o Pefocti o ✓L 2 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: t�^e �� re oQt . s c� LY �7 o(a.-�i o✓� 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: ITowA . 200 G 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SI URE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF ROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: v 7 v REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board L"J Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: L� Complete ElInco plete Directo of anning & Zoning br Designee Da e 4 EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) o Survey data (distance and acreage) o Contours (existing and finished) o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways o Zoning boundaries o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) o Location of septic tanks (if applicable) o Location of any easements o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard o North arrow o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ❑ Site Plan $ 185* ❑ Amended Site Plan $ 185* ❑ Administrative Site Plan $ 85* * Includes $10.00 recording fee TYPE: CA )G#: .91cGRAW-ED[SONO DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION FEATURES The classic lines and sophisticated construction of the Vision Wall light makes it an ideal complement to site design. The Vision Wall can be mounted in either UP or DOWN mounted applications with no necessary modifications to the door or housing. U.L. 1598 listed and CSA certified for wet locations in up or down mounting applications. 40° C ambient temperature environment rated. IP65 Rating standard. APPLICATION Whether mounted downward for the cutoff classified illumination of walkways and parking lots or upward for lighting canopies or ceilings, the Vision Wall blends easily into the architecture of a facility with soft lines and gentle curves that enhance the beauty of the application. DIMENSIONS A•••Housing The housing is one piece and constructed of die-cast aluminum for precise control of tolerances and repeatability in manufacture. 8... Mounting Gasketed zinc plated mounting attachment fits directly to 4' J-box. Two studs are provided into the plate that provide easy mounting to the luminaire. An embedded mount and surface conduit mount assembly is available as an accessory. C•••Optical Assembly Optical cage designed for up to 12' of movement on a rotating assembly. A concealed, stainless steel adjustment screw is provided on the exterior of the housing allowing for customized tilting of the optical module without accessing the fixture or affecting the appearance of the luminaire. D... Optical Modules All optical modules feature a rigid cage assembly that houses precisely formed and mounted, 95% reflective segments. Optical modules are all prewired with quick disconnect plugs and can be removedwithout tools from the cage via two thumb latches. Optional Type 11, III, IV and FX wall grazing optic available. E ... Door Die-cast door and continuous silicone gasketing accommodates either up or down mounting applications. Door frame is hinged and secured to the housing via (4) captive, stainless steel fasteners. Lens is 1/8' heat- and impact -resistant clear tempered glass. F•••Finish Standard colors are grey, white, black and bronze polyester powder coat. Consult the McGraw -Edison Architectural Colors brochure for a complete selection of other available colors. VWSVISION WALL SMALL 5 0- 1 7 5 W High Pressure Sodium Metal Halide WALL MOUNTED LUMINAIRE >:sAss tsJe � ENERGY DATA Reactor Ballast Input Watts 50W HPS NPF/HPF (58 Watts) 70W HPS NPF/HPF (92 Watts) 100W HPS NPF/HPF 018 Watts). 15OW HPS NPF/HPF (175 Watts) High Reactance Ballast Input Watts 70W MH HPF (94 Watts) 100W MH HPF (129 Watts) 15OW HPS HPF (190 Watts) CWI Ballast Input Watts 70W HPS HPF (96 Watts) 10OW HPS HPF (132 Watts) 150W HPS HPF (190 Watts) 175W HPS 9HPF (223 Watts) CWA Ballast Input Watts 175W MH HPF (210 Watts) +----15 7/16' 1393mmi I COOPER LIGHTING 114 7/16- ,.T&,,+ ADHO10410 1 h`i / 'T PHOTOMETRICS I VWSVISION WALL SMALL ■■�■■_■ ■ ■N/i���■ ■r i:: \■ ■r/��\1■ ■■■■Mill■■ ■ ■■■ ■■ t VW-S-175-MH-MT-3S VW-S-150-HPS-MT-4S 20' Mounting Height 20' Mounting Height 175-Watt MH Type III 150-Watt HPS Type IV 14,000-Lumen Clear Lamp 16,000-Lumen Clear Lamp ORDERING INFORMATION SAMPLE NUMBER: VW-S-50-MH-MT.2S VW S Product r ousing Lamp Lamp P208=208V Distribution Family ize Wattage Type V T 1 VW=Vision =Smell 50=50W MH=Metal . S= Wall 70=70W Halide V —Type IV 100=100W HPS=High 277=277V FX=Wall Graz 150=150W Pressure 347=347V Optic 175=175W Sodium 480=480V MT=Multi Tap Wired 277V TT=Triple-Tap Wired 347V Lamp Lamp 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 Footcandle Table Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height. Mounting Footcandle Values for .Height Isofootcandle Lines A B C D E 10, 8.00 4.00 2.00 0.80 0.40 - 15' 3.40 1.70 0.85 0.34 0.17 20' 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.20 0.10 Options (add as suffix) Colors' (add as suffix) F=Single Fuse (120, 277V) BK=Black FF=Double Fused (208, 240 or 480V) AP=Grey OR=Quartz Restrike BZ=Bronze PC --Button Photccontrol WH=White W1=Weathered Iron Accessories (order separately) VWS/VS=Vandal Shield VWS/EM=Embedded Mount VWS/1B_Thru-way Box' 'Products also available in non -US voltages and 50Hz for international markets. Consult factory for availability and ordering information. 'Multi -Tap ballast is 1201208/240/277V wired 277V. Triple Tap ballast is 120/277/347V wired 347V. 'Other finish colors available. Consult McGraw -Edison Architectural Colors brochure. "For use in downlight applications only. / NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. COOPM Lighting www.cooperlighting.com g Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 ADHO10410 August 4, 2005 419233P LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR SOUTH BURLINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT ADDITION Refer to attached Landscape Plan and Landscaping Detail sheets for individual project locations and planting details. Project Area Description and Cost Estimate A Island/buffer northwest of fire station; Specific work area (4,500 SF) at north end of treed island/buffer: 1. clear and grub 500 SY (4500 SF) @ $1.50/SY = $750.00 2. remove 6f trees including stumps as directed by the City Arborist @ $300.00/ea = $1,800.00 3. fine grade, topsoil, fertilize, seed and mulch @ $7.00/SY = $3,500.00 Subtotal Area A = $6,050.00 C, D, E, F, G Parking islands southeast of municipal building: Remove several inches of old mulch, weeds and grass from islands and planting strips, and re -mulch with 3 to 4 inches of double shredded, natural, un-dyed cedar bark mulch. C 780 SF D 290 SF E 120 SF F 450 SF G 1200 SF 2880 SF or 320 SY 320 SY @ $7.00/SY = G Sidewalk buffer planting #1: $2,240.00 Plant four deciduous trees 30' OC between existing linden trees along west side of Dorset Street sidewalk. 4 Ulmus parvifolia/Chinese or Lacebark Elm 21/2-3" Cal. B&B @ $500/ea = $2,000.00 S ENGINEERING • PLANNING • DEVELOPMENT • MANAGEMENT &KRM August 4, 2005 419233P H East lawn of Municipal Buildings and Fire Department between driveways: 1. remove 2 stumps @ $100/ea = $200.00 2. remove 2 trees including stumps @ $400.00/ea = $800.00 3. repair lawn: topsoil fertilize, seed and mulch L.S. $500.00 Subtotal Area H = $1,500.00 I Sidewalk buffer planting #2: Plant 2 Gingko Trees 15' OC south of bus shelter and northeast of Fire Department along west side of Dorset Street sidewalk. 2 Gingko biloba Autumn Gold'/Autumn Gold Gingko 21/2-Y Cal. B&B @ $500/ea = $1,000.00 Landscaping Summary: The required landscape budget, based on the City's Landscape Standard and the $520,100.00 estimated construction cost for the fire station addition, is $12,700.00. Proposed landscape budget: Project Areas A C, D, E, F, G G H I John Steele Landscape Architect Subtotals $6,050.00 $2,240.00 $2,000.00 $1, 500.00 1 000.00 Total $12,790.00 ENGINEERING • PLANNING • DEVELOPMENT • MANAGEMENT lvci Q;y- ala-I a..Ll�i' �S!x�� �t{A� van`> --- - ;llll.l�1 '4S 10 fi4!0 0o j All 303U 0i e7 r?)� 9 21 a8 d73AIVO``ray 00SINm Q2Aed -ep.n�d lyib dd. SSthlfl L a q� X� ra v v AV e OCT BALL 'EED SEPARATOR FABRIC 1. BARK MULCH ACKFILL 11 CONTINUOUS SOIL RIM NISHED GRADE ._.................. _ i _ ........-------._.... __ ._....._......._.._.. f : _..... _...... _...... I ....... i 3 x BALL DIAMETER EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO PLANTING, CHECK PLANTS DAILY AND WATER TO KEEP SOIL DAMP BUT NOT SOAKING WET. 2. ANTI DESICANT SPRAY MAY BE APPLIED TO ALL EVERGREENS AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. 3. PLANT TREES AND SHRUBS SO THAT THE ROOT BALL RESTS FIRMLY ON TOP OF UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED SOIL WITH THE TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION SLIGHTLY HIGHER (1-2") THAN THE FINISHED GRADE. SCARIFY THE SIDES OF HOLES. 4. REMOVE TWINE AND BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL; IF SYNTHETIC, REMOVE COMPLETELY. REMOVE THE TOP HALF OF WIRE BASKET AND CUT THE REMAINING BASKET IN NUMEROUS PLACES. 5. BACKFILL WITH SUITABLE SOIL FROM HOLE. AMEND WITH TOPSOIL AND COMPOST AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. LIGHTLY TAMP BACKFILL IN LAYERS TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS AND WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 24 HOURS OF PLANTING. 6. USE AGED, UNCOLORED DOUBLE SHREDDED BARK MULCH.TAPER MULCH TO BASE OF TRUNK. 7. STAKE AND GUY TREES WHEN NECESSARY TO STABILIZE ROOT BALL IN LOOSE SOIL OR HIGH WINDS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. REMOVE ALL STAKES AND GUY MATERIALS ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING. NOT TO SCALE 0 �S o WO J 'y TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION WEED SEPARATOR FABRIC 3" BARK MULCH 4" CONTINUOUS SOIL RIM FINISHED GRADE BACKFILL ROOT BALL CONTINUOUS WEED SEPARATOR FABRIC COVER ENTIRE SHRUB PLANTING BED 3" BARK MULCH 3" CONTINUOUS SOIL RIM FINISHED GRADE BACKFILL —ROOT BALL PLANT LIST QUANTI Y M BOTANICAL NAME/COMMON NAME au ROOT REMARKS 2 GB GINGKO BILOBA 'AUTUMN GOLD'/ 2 1/2-3" CAL. B&B UNIFORM AUTUMN GOLD GINGKO 4 UP ULMUS PARVIFOUA/ 2 1/2-3" CAL. B&B UNIFORM CHINESE OR LACEBARK ELM SEEDING FORMULA URBAN AREAS % WT. LBS./A. NAME PUR% GERM 42.5 34.0 CREEPING RED FESCUE 98 85 10.0 8.0 PERENNIAL RYE GRASS 95 90 42.5 34.0 KENTUCKY BLUE GRASS 85 85 5.0 4.0 ANNUAL RYE GRASS 95 85 100.0 80.0 GENERAL NOTES SEED MIXTURE: SHALL NOT HAVE A WEED CONTENT EXCEEDING 0.40% BY WEIGHT, AND SHALL BE FREE OF ALL NOXIOUS SEED. SEED: APPLY SEEDING FORMULA AT THE RATE OF OF 5 LBS/1000 SF, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. FERTILIZER: USE 10-10-10 FORMULA WITH SEED AND APPLY AT THE RATE OF 500 LBS/ACRE OR 10 LBS/1000 SF. (HYDRO SEEDERS MAY USE 19-19-19 FORMULA). AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE: APPLY AT THE RATE OF 2 TONS/ACRE, 100 LBS/1000 SF, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. HAY MULCH: PLACE MULCH AT THE RATE OF 2 TONS/ACRE, 80-100 LBS/1000 SF, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. USE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 25%. TOPSOIL: USE WITH SEED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. PROVIDE 6" OF TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE PAVEMENT IS REMOVED AND A MINIMUM OF 4" IN ALL OTHER SEEDED AREAS. RECEIVED AUG 0 4 2005 City of So. Burlington ws P Vim• engineering planning management REDUCED SCALE HALF SIZE PROPOSED ADDITION TO DRAWN BY DATE SOUTH3-05 BURLINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENTJWP 8 CHECKED BY PROJ. OJ. NO. N0. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT JAS 419233P PROJ. ENG. DRAW. NO. LANDSCAPING DETAILS JAS meat SHEET 2 OF 2 r .r I 5 AJFj1J 6ENFr--AT6F- oNNC. F'Aa 0�--6Xrs�'. 1�uM�i�le PA✓EP 9,::>A 7 --- I f - (�G 2As'�? CV q� I I U'TY HA Ll— PA 9�1 �- I14 WALl� ` EXrsr. PA�K�N�� i k 575' tPE WAL-t- �7 NE W e f-A�TP 5Nou! 57mp F,xisr. Ai� Kim�Pnl AE N£�J MANFID I..E —- I - KE ATE $xtar• MAN; `NsW �> x1s% 1-1<, C ► N P �aLE o-y�h�(TIoN � m EXt5Tln16 Fi�E sTHr�oN P09SFT ST,,EET NORTH EXtS7 C. PAJSD pRrVF- 7 1-:) Gib of So. Bu�ingt NG' I �clsT.-�AR.actN�y I.. ^FXtST. Lt6HT I S(pFWALK ---- C----_ PARKING: 3 SPACES REQUIRED PER 1,000 SF 23,300 SF BUILDING COMPLEX 70 SPACES REQUIRED 92 SPACES PROVIDED HEIGHT OF ADDITION: 26' (MATCH. EXISTING) 4.96 +/. ACRES - 50' FRONT YARD 416% LOT COVERAGE (8.8 % EXIST. BUILDING + 33.8% EXIST. PAVED SURFACES) (9.6 % BUILDING WINEW ADDITION + 33 % PAVED SURFACES) SITE PLAN SOUTH BUMJI TM FIFr DB'Ali' MENr DDORSE-r STFiEEr 61105 .,��. shor`" P� ;� �$v�' �.k i� a �nt.rlor• A cwt7ecraF �_. 2D Mb at" dam Fa"m vw wW* 05452 P..802579 E8 t.802FT[2M SCOTT + PARTNERS 20 main street essex function vermont 05452 p. 802.879.5153 A R C H I T E C T S. f. 802.872.2764 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Ray Belair RE: South Burlington Fire Department DATE: August 3, 2005 WE ARE SENDING YOU: VIA: fax mail X drop-off pick-up COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 Application for Site Plan Review 5 6.27.05 Site Plan 1 6.27.05 Site Plan (11"x17") 5 Cut Sheet for Exterior light 5 Landscaping Description and Cost Estimate 5 8.3.05 Landscape Plan 5 8.3.05 Landscape Details THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval As requested For review and comment X For your use REMARKS: cc: SCOTT + PARTNERS 20 main street essex iunction vermont 05452 P. 802.879.5153 A R C H I T E C T S f. 802.872.2764 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Ray Belair RE: South Burlington Fire Department DATE: August 9, 2005 WE ARE SENDING YOU: VIA: fax mail X drop-off pick-up COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 5 6.27.05 Site Plan 1 6.27.05 Site Plan (11"x17") THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval As requested For review and comment X For your use REMARKS: Revised site plan addressing parking attached. cc: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #)658-7952 City of South Burlington Dorset_ Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05401 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) South Burlington Water Department — 400 Dorset Street, South Burlington, 864-4504 Vermont 05401 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) . 658-1953 Robert Stoner: Northern Architects, Inc. 115 College Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:O'�orset Street 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable)___ 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Offices and garage facilities 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet r 1 0 )2 stories: Building area - 3600sf, lst floor = 1800sgf, zng lour , Building height to roof ridge - +/- 30' 7 to 9 ©YOO� 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 9.5 %; landscaped areas•21 Uo:�Okj building, parking, outside storage 27 % 6M— $180,000 to 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $21_6 ,000 , Landscaping $ 5,900 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ Not available at this time. 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: December 1987 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 41 Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 2 11-12 noon 6 12-1p.m. 5 ; 1-2 p.m. 2 ; 2-3 p.m.- 3-4 p.m. 4 4-5 p.m._10 ; 5-6 p.m. 0 ; 6-7 p.m. 0 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:30AM to 4:30PPI 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Mondav through Friday DATE OF. SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE OF HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION 18 NOVEMBER 1986 PAGE 2 3. Site plan application of the\,South Burlington Water De t,L for construction of a 3600 sq. ft. addition (1800 sq. ft. on 2-Floors) to the City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Mrs. Lafleur noted that the City Manager and City Council have reviewed the application and have no problems with it. Mr. Stoner advised that per the request of the Fire Chief, changes have been made to the access road. There will be no new public entrance to the building. It is the intention of the Water Dept. that the addition be similar in character to the present City Hall building. The Dept. needs outside storage for pipe, hydrants, etc.. About 2400 sq. ft. would be adequate, and the Dept. could clear space on the other side of the access road. The area will be chain link fenced. Mr. Belter asked if the fence could be made to look decent from I-89. Mr. Stoner outlined a number of possible camouflage techniques. Mrs. Lafleur said the Commission could view the fence when it is up and decide if additional screening is needed. Mr. Burgess asked if there will be any grievances because Police vehicles will have to be moved. He noted that for the record this will be considered the City's problem. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of the South Burlington Water Department for construction of a 3600 sq. ft. addition (1800 sq. ft. on 2 floors) to the City Hall as depicted on a plan entitled "South Burlington Water Department addition to City Hall, Dorset Street, South Burlington, Schematic Design" prepared Py Northern Architects, Inc, dated 11/13/86 with the following stipulations: 1. A $5900 landscaping escrow agreement shall be in place prior to permit. It shall be used to landscape the area in front of the building after Dorset Street is widened. 2. Following completion, the City Planner shall review the placement of the chain link fence to determine if further screening is required. 3. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. Mrs. Maher seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 4. Consider request of Robert F. Torney, President of the Olympiad, to make a temporary driveway permanent at the Olympiad, 70 Farrell Rd. Mr. Torney explained that the driveway, put in originally as a construction driveway, is useful for heavy things that are PLANNING COMMISSION 28 ' OCTOBER 1986 page 7 17. Water Department shall review and approve water system plans prior to permit. 18. Roadsshall have an 18 inch gravel base in all cases. 19. The maximum number of adjusting bricks shall be two courses in any manhole or catch asin. 20. A cash contribution for a sidewalk alon Hinesburg Road shall e made prior to permit. The amount shall e de'E-e'rmlned by the City Planner as sufficient o construct the sidewalk along e east side of the property along Hinesburg Roa . 21. It is the applicant's responsibility to record the final plat within 90 a s or is approval is null and void. It shall be a roved by the Planner and signed by the Chairman or Clerk o e Commission prior to recording. 22. The first building permit must be obtained within 3 years or this-approva is null and void. Mrs. Maher seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Dan Pillsbury, who has been farming property across the road stated that the City got the permit to expand the Airport Parkway Sewage Plant and also got federal funding by saying they would spread the sludge on city farmland. This farmland is now being developed so that it will not be available to receive the sludge. Cga:t s plan application of thi South Burlington Water eDar men or_ cons ruction of a 3600—s-m-4-4-t—,-addition to Ci rse Mrs. Peacock, who is Chairman of the Water Commission, stepped down during this discussion. Roby Stoner explained that the plan is to add on to the City Hall building at the rear. The addition will be 2 stories totaling 3600 sq. ft. (1800 on each floor). There will be offices upstairs and a garage downstaiVs. The access drive will be removed or replaced. Mrs. Lafleur explained that the plan as presented shows what will happen after Droset St. is widened; however, improvements in front of City Hall will be the responsibility of the City. The plan will be revised. The fire chief also has a question on the access drive, and the new plan will address his concerns. Mr. Stoner stressed that the access drive is only for Water Dept. vehicles. The public will enter from the front, through City Hall. There is already enough parking on site to meet the Water Dept's needs. Mrs. Peacock added that they don't plan any changes to the parking lot; the Dorset St. -cproject will trigger the need to adjust parking. PLANNING COMMISSION 28 OCTOBER 1986 page 8 Mr. Dooley said he wasn't convinced that present parking is adequate. Msn Peacock stressed that the only new traffic that the Water Dept. will be generating are trucks and employees. Customers already come to City Hall to pay bills. Mr. Burgess asked who will own the building addition. Ms. Peacock said this is not yet certain. Mr. Burgess said the answer to this may determine who is responsible for the parking situation. Ms. Peacock noted that landscaping requirements will probably be met after the Dorset St. widening, and funds for this can be put in escrow. Mr. Stoner explained that there is a need for outdoor storage for pipe, hydrants, etc., and they propose this for the rear of the building back in among the trees. Mrs. Maher then moved that the application be continued until the applicant has the necessary revisions prepared. Mr. Doo e seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 10:40 pm. Clerk City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 Robie Stoner Northern Architects 115 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 26 November 26, 1986 Re: Water Department Addition, 575 Dorset Street Dear Robie: Enclosed are the minutes of the October 28, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. You may apply for a building permit after posting the appropriate bonds. Sincerely, CL Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encls cc: Catherine Peacock South Burlington Wia.ter Department 11/17/86 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site plan application of the South Burlington Water Department for construction of a 3600 square foot addition (1800 square feet on 2 floors) to the City Hall as depicted on a plan entitled "South Burlington Water Department addition to City Hall, Dorset Street, South Burlington, Schematic Design" prepared by Northern Architects, Inc., dated 11/13/86 with the following stipulations: 1. A $5900 landscaping escrow agreement shall be in place prior to permit. It shall be used to landscape the area in front of the building after Dorset Street is widened. 2. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. 2 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: �uutb urtttigtuu tre epartmeut 575 D ur$Ct street �vutit Riurtrugtuu, lierittmtt 05401 MEMORANDUM SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE NOVEMBER 18,1986 AGENDA NOVEMBER 14,1986 HARRINGTON BROTHERS 1 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 400 PATCHER ROAD PLANS REVIEWED BY THIS ON THE ADDITION TO THE, HARRINGTON BUILDING. THE ONLY PROBLEM I FOUND IS WITH THE PARKING SPACES ON THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING. FOR PROPER ACCESS FOR OUR EQUIPMENT PARKING SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN THAT AREA. 2. WATER DEPARTMENT DDITION TO CITY HALL PLANS R HIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM., BUT THERE COULD BE WHEN THE DORSET STREET PROJECT IS STARTED.WE MUST KEEP IT IN OUR MIND TO LOOK AT THE PARKING LOTS CHANGES AT A LATER DATE. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: November 18, 1986 agenda items Date: November 14, 1986 3) (�W=�ATERDEPARTME;;�>jCITY HALL ADDITION 1. Plan has been reviewed and is acceptable. 5) HARRINGTON BROTHERS, 400 PATCHEN ROAD 1. This improvement should eliminate the large trucks from blocking part of Patchen Road when they make deliveries. F M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner Re: November 18, 1986 agenda items Date: November 14, 1986 2) DBI INDUSTRIES, 80 ALLEN ROAD Mr. Cannizzaro and Mr. Goetz propose to subdivide this 4.6 acre parcel into a 1.71 acre parcel with the existing building and a 2.55 acre parcel. The property is located on the north side of Allen Road, just east of Burlington Drug. At sketch plan review, the Commission was concerned about the extension of the sewer main from in front of Pepsi Company and whether it could be required at site plan or should be required. now. City Attorney Dick Spokes said it,should be required at. this subdivision approval. He suggested two alternative stipUla- tions: 1. "The vacant lot can not be developed withotit municipal sewer"; or 2. "The vacant lot can not be developed without site plan or subdivision approval and the Planning Commission reserves the right to examine sewer at future site plan or future subdivision approvals". 3 SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT, 575 DORSET STREET The Water Department proposes to construct a 3600 square foot addition (1800 square feet on two floors) to the rear of the municipal building. The property is zoned "Municipal". Access: Access will continue as it currently exists with one curb cut to the northern parking lot, one for the fire station and two for the southern parking lot. The southerly most. driveway will be closed with the Dorset Street widening. Circulation: Circulation will continue as it is now with the circular driveway around the back of the building. Parking: The entire building requires 94 parking spaces. The plans show 117 spaces divided between the northern and southern lots. Fifty are in the main southern lot. The plans show three handicapped spaces which are incorrectly located. Landscaping The. proposed addition requires $5900 in rnew landscaping. The plans state that the Water Department will. use 1 the required amount to "selectively cut trees in the wooded area to encourage growth of the best trees" and to plant grass. I do not believe this meets the intent of our ordinance. At the very least, I suggest the Water Department place the money in escrow to use to improve the front of the property after Dorset Street is widened in addition to planting grass and selectively cutting trees. Other: See Chief Goddette's and Bill Szymanski's comments. 4) OLYMPIAD, 70 FARRELL STREET Mr. Robert F. Torneyy, president of the Olympiad requests approval to retain a driveway that was designed to be a temporary construction curb cut. They are finding it useful for deliveries. I't is not shown on the original plans since it was for construction use only. The Planning Commission has the power to approve all driveways. The enclosed letter addresses Mr. Torney's,concerns and describes the replacement culvert the city will require if this is approved. This gravel driveway serves a single doorway at the top of a steep set of stairs. I question how useful it is for deliveries. Mr. Torney should be available to discuss his interests with the Planning Commission. 5) HARRINGTON BROTHERS, 400 PATCHEN ROAD ,Mr. Peters proposes to construct a 3800 square foot addition to the Harrington Brothers building on Patchen Road. The property is zoned R4 and this non -conforming use was given permission to expand after considerable discussion and site visits (see Zoning Board of Adjustment minutes). The major advantage of this proposal. is that most loading and unloading will occur around the back of the building rather than in front where it stops traffic on Patc:hen Road. ('rhe Zoning Board has asked the Commission to review the zoning in this area since the R41desi.gnat.ion seems inappropriate for the area that is comprised of Harrin-aton Brothers, the Frank Cota property, the land fill, etc.). Access: With the exception of a seven foot strip along the north western property line, all of the 144 feet of frontage is paved. Part, of this paved area serves an overhead door. The front of area to the left, of this door could be landscaped. Circulation: Circulation is adequate around the rear of the property with an access road out the back that connects to the 2 ncrQv t °to 4 ro W N M'R�•A PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 November 14, 1986 Robert Stoner Northern Architects, Inc. 115 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Water Department, 575 Dorset Street Dear Robie: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 18, 1986 to represent your request. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls cc: Catherine Peacock r trees . 'Phis information w i I I be available at. the meeting. I am riot, satisfied with t;he 200 seedlings that are part, of the land- scaping plan since they do not appear to contribute a significant amount, t.o the landscaping. I recommend larger trees in the wet. �.ire-as as wel L as on the rest of the property. Other: The traffic overlay zone permits 72 trip ends if we assume Holmes Road is signalized due to the Lakewood project. Data supplied by the applicant shows that the car wash and. convenience store will generate 171 trip ends/peak hour. (See letter) See Bill. Szymanski's comments. 9) SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT, 575 DORSET STREET The South Burlington Water Department proposes to construct a 3600 square foot addition (1800 square feet on two floors) to the back of City Hall. The 5.7 acre lot is zoned Municipal. Access: Main access is shown from the existing curb cut on Dorset Street. The southern curb cut will be closed to conform with the Dorset Street widening plans and to improve access. The Fire Department driveway and the northern parking lot driveway will remain. A new access is shown to 595 Dorset Street to conform with the Dorset Street widening since their access will combine with City Hall after the widening. Circulation: The Circulation around the rear of the property will be closed. The new addition will be reached from the northern parking lot. Parking: The 23,600 square foot office building and addition requires 94 parking spaces; 111 are shown. Landscaping: A $5900 landscaping plan is required. New parking lot landscaping includes 10 sugar maple and 5 Austrian pine valued at approximately $2200. The street trees on Dorset Street are presumably part of the widening project rather than this application. Perhaps a contribution towards the City's share should be made. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. A water and sewer easement cuts through this property; construction is outside the easement. There is a 50 foot Conservation lone along the Interstate ramp right-of-way. This setback is maintained. 4 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: # 2 . i§uuttj Nurlingtvn dire Departinrut 575 11urset ttreet li�untll R3urlingtun, Vermont 054111 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 MEMORANDUM ---------------- SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE OCTOBER 28,1986 AGENDA ITEMS OCTOBER 21,1986 CITY COMPLEX ADDITION FOR WATER DEPT. Plan reviewed by this department and the following was found to be a problem in trying to give proper protection; A. Hydrant location. B. Access Around the building. C. Parking and access to the front of the building. With this plan or design there is no way proper protection can be given. Thomas Farrell Property Shelburne Road Condos During the review the following was found which needed changes A. Buildings brought closer to the road so the distance was no more then 60' from the center of the roof and 10 foot from the back of the parking space. B. No less the 3 hydrants. I did meet with a member from Mr. Lamphere's office on the problems but the corrections were not made. #3. Proposed Car Wash- Farrelis Property. Only problem found at this time is one hydrant is required by one of the drive ways to the property off the new road. r easement. given 4. Underground power shall be placed back of the sidewalk (lot. side) with telephone and T.V. The gas main shall be in the grass strip between curb and sidewalk. 5. All utility plans shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to installation or at the very latest prior to issuing any building permits. This also includes street lighting. 6. Water Department shall review and approve water system plans. 7. Road typical section on page 13, delete note 117 reference to decreasing the 18 inches of gravel base. 8. Precast concrete inlets and catch basins can be manufactured to exact dimension therefore there is no need for up to 5 courses of bricks. Road salt deteriorates bricks and mortar. The maximum course of bricks should be two courses. 7) FARRELL, PROPERTY, CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, HOLMES ROAD EXTENDED EASTERLY 1. Proposed Holmes Road extension is plotted on sketch plan dated September 23, 1986. The project should be planned around this location. I would recommend there be one road opening to the site. This opening should be opposite the planned Green Mountain Drive intersection. 2. Site shall include storm water runoff control. 8) CAR WASH, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Proposed Holmes Road extension is not located as shown. It is partly located on the property to the south. That property is also in for site plan review. Both must work together to locate it where planned. 2. A single access drive should be considered. This would give exiting cars a greater length of travel before entering a public street allowing more time to drip and avoiding iceing on the street which is a problem the City has with other car washes. It. also gets the drive away from a. intersection that, will be busy in the future. 9) CITY HALL ADDITION IWATER DEPARTMENT) DORSET 1. I liave worked with the Water Board and architect on this project and I approve this layout. 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 October. 24, 1986 Robie Stoner Northern Architects 115 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Water Department addition, 575 Dorset Street Dear Robie: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission regarding your application. Also enclosed are Bill SzS-manski's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 28, 1986 to represent ,your request. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner. JB1'/mcp EncIs cc: Sout.h Burlington Water. Department: (:'atherine Peacock a t 17, F NORTHERN ARCHITECTS, inc. 115 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 802-658-1953 TO Ffe a 54YIt WE ARE SENDING YOU �( Attached El Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings` Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ DATE the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES 'n DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 24V J (:;/. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: X For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted As requested ❑ Returned for corrections For review and comment ❑ /❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: PROW M63 nr<as inc, calla am 01471 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES 'n DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 24V J (:;/. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: X For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted As requested ❑ Returned for corrections For review and comment ❑ /❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: PROW M63 nr<as inc, calla am 01471 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 December 5, 1986 Robie Stoner Northern Architects, Inc. 115 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Water Department Addition, 575 Dorset Street Dear Robie: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the November 18, 1986 Planning Commission minutes. Please be sure to obtain your building permit within 6 months or request an extension before the 6 month deadline. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encl cc: Catherine Peacock Water Department