Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0000 Brookwood DriveOFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION Agreement made this day of %-ice''/ 1980 by and between BROOKWOOD DELL (hereinafter referred to as "Owner") and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON (hereinafter referred to as "City"). W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has approved a final subdivision plat entitled "Proposed Single Family Dwellings, South Burlington - Brookwood, Ltd.", dated April 26, 1979, revised as of September 1979, and recorded in Map Volume 153 at Page 67 of the South Burlington City Land Records; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the South Burlington City Planning Commission dated October 9, 1979 contains the following condition: That the Owner make an offer of irrevocabl( dedication and in conjunction therewith, execute an appropriate right of way and easement agreement for the purposes of a storm drainage easement, and WHEREAS, the above described easement is to be dedicated to the City free and clear of all encumbrances, pursuant to said final approval and final plat; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered a Right of Way and Easement Agreement to the City for the easement above - described. Vol.E 162 Fe, ge 66 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the South Burlington City Planning Commission's final approval and in further consideration of the sum of One Dollar in lawful money paid by the City to the Owner and other good and valuable consideration it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City a Right of Way and Easement Agreement (an unexecuted copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A) for the storm drainage easement over premises depicted on the aforementioned plat, said delivery being a formal offer of dedication to the City to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such offer of dedication by the Council of the City. 2. The Owner agrees that this formal offer of dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time. 3. This irrevocable offer of dedication shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all successors and/or assigns of the Owner. IN PRESENCE OF: BROOKW90D DELL /� A General artner -2- iF City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET -s_- SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 863-2891 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER WILLIAM I. SZYMANSKI December 6, 1982 Craig Spafford Associates 186 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Brookwood Development Off Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont Dear Craig: The street and utility construction for the above referenced project is complete and acceptable to the City except for the following: 1. There are some sidewalks that were broken during house construction that have not been replaced. 2. A section of guard rail along the sidewalk at the large culvert has not been installed. Upon completion of this work we will release the funds held in escrow for this project. Very truly urs, Li .t.-4x'�' Willia J. zymanski City Manager WJS/b September 5, 198U James O'Brien 19 Brookwood Drive :youth Burlington, Vermont Dear ;-ir. O'Brien: Enclosed is a copy of the Planning Commission's final approval of your revised lot lines. When your revised plat is prepared, you shoula sukxuit it to me to be checked. I will then need one copy for the clerk (milar) anla two blueprint copies. Dsincerely, David h. Spitz, City Planner r Ds/mcg 1 Enci 8/26/80 DHS FINDINGS OF FACT AND/OR STIPULATIONS For the Revised Final Plat application of .lames O'Brien for a revision to lot 31 in the Brookwood development as depicted on a plan entitled "Brook- wood, LTD" dated 8/26/80. Stipulations 1. A revised plat showing the complete dimensions of the new lot 31 and the O'Brien lot shall be recorded within 90 days. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next weeks agenda items Date: 8/22/80 3)� O'Brien - Brookwood Mr. O'Brien wants to buy 3,472 square feet to add to his existing lot. It will come from lot 31 which has well above the minimum lot size and side yard. See map. 4) K of C - Berard Drive The Planning Commission gave preliminary approval to lot 18 last summer, but the lot was deleted after questions arose regarding impact on the adjacent airport approach lights. However, the airport has since indicated that develop- ment on the plateau above the lights will not pose a problem. The proposed use was approved by the Zoning Board last month. Some parking and layout problems still exist and hopefully will be resolved by Tuesday's meeting. 5) Grandview Because of financing requirements, applicant wishes to reverse the projects' phasing order and construct Phase IV next. Buildings will be shifted slightly. Applicant is also requesting a higher salesprice ceiling due to inflationary costs. See attached letter. 6) Benson Applicant has two existing buildings on a 3.7 acre parcel with 145 feet of public road frontage. Current proposal is for a third building; applicant also wants to explore total potentiality for development of the parcel. Property might qualify as a PCD in combination with one or more adjacent properties. Consideration has been given previously to extension of road to the cinema parking lot and perhaps as a service road behind Williston Road. 7) Moore (Farrell) I am enclosing a memo from Dick Ward and a Planning Commission site plan review from last October pertaining to the use of this property. Building is proposed for offices and is within the maximum square footage for the C2 zone. Parking spaces required by the ordinance number 56. [applicant feels 45 is sufficient and has shown 48. Spaces are sized at 10' x 16' per the ordinance which, as I have described to you in other reviews, is contrary to most standards. , , PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH 'aBURLINGTON PLANNING CO1q-1ISSION ± The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South; Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, ;August 26 1980. at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following: 1. Revised final plat application by James O'Brien for a modification to Brookwood Village (previously Oakbrook ). Property is bounded by O'Brien's lot to the east, by Brookwood Drive to the north, and by Brookwdod lots 22,23 _ and 30 to the south and west. 2 Revised final plat application by Rene Berard for rpincluc�f dot-._JR in a commercial subdivision on Berard DAP Prnrty ; �,r,,,n�od }��A; r__ Parkway, lands of the applicant, Auto Canteen Company, the City of South Burlington, and the Winooski River. 3. Revised final plat application by Flanders -Boardman for phase IV !24 uni a) of Grandview Condominiums, also entitled "Southridge." Application includes_ _ revised phasing schedule for entire project. Property is bounded on the south by lands of the State of Vermont, on the west by Dorset Street, on.the north by Kennedy Drive and lands of John Ewing and Stokes Gentry, and on the east Twin Oaks. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Sidney B. Poger, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission August 9, 1980 _ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT Vjdot k.-'7b9',��C11 I Name of Applicant J'�tY y L t- 1 �' R 46 Z- z'ee II Name of Subdivision (�C��1.G� >1�111- ��^"eV64 L"O3/ III Indicate any changes,'to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, sur- veyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application:, IV Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application V Attach a final plat drawing (originals not needed) showing the following information: (1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title, the name and address of the record owner and subdivider, the name, license number and seal of the licensed land surveyor, the boundaries of the subdivision and its general location in relation to existing streets or other land marks, scale (numerical and graphic), date and true north arrow. (2) Street names and lines, pedestrial ways, lots, reservations, easements, and areas to be dedicated to public use. (3) Sufficient data acceptable to the City Engineer to determine readily the location, bearing and length of every street line, lot line, boudary line and to reproduce such lines upon the ground. Where applicable these should be tied to reference points previously established by the city. -2- (4) The length of all straight lines, the deflection angles, radii, length of curves and central angles of all curves, tangent distances and tangent bearings for each street. (5) By property designation on such Plat, all public space for which, offers of cession are made by the subdivider and those spaces title to which is reserved by him. (6) Lots within the subdivision numbered in numerical order within blocks, and bloc?:s lettered in alphabetical order. (7) The location of all os the i:�provements referred -'Co in Section 301.Itand in addition thereto the location of all utility poles, se -.:age disposal systerns, water -supply systems and rough grading and other devices and methods of draining the area affecting the subrivision. +—T� soak n-., n (8) Permanent reference monuments sho-.:-n thus: and lot corner iarhers shown thus: "0". (9) Construction drawings of all :_-equired i-.7torovements. VI Lnciose supiJorting documents listed belo;? _ I -_---t y L tep.,ko ' (1) Copies of Droposed needs, agreaments or other cocu::-_-nts showing the manner in which open space, including park and recreational areas and school site areas, are to be dedicated, reserved and maintained and a certificate of the City Attorney that these documents are satisfactory. (2) A certificate of the City 11acineer as to the satisfactory completion of all irrarove-ments required b-ly, the Co:n-Assion, or, in lieu of any required L-rprovements not so completed, a performance bond to secure completion of such improvements and their lziaintenance for a period of two years, and written evidence that the City Council is satisfied either with the bonding or surety company or with security furnished by the subdivider. A - (3) A copy of such covenants or dead restrictions as are in- tended to cover all or part of the tract. (4) A prospectus describing the management organization if one is required. (5) In the case of a subdivision or development served by a privately owned and/or maintained street:. (a) a copy of all proposed deeds, agreements, or other documents which convey or relate to the use of a privately owned street or right-of-way, and a certi- fic7-te of the City Attorney that these do=ments are satisfactory. (b) ( icna,ure) -3- a completed contract between the lanoovmer and the city regarding the number of lots or dwelling units to be served by the proposed right-of-way or private street and the responsibility for the roadway maint- enance, along with a certificate of the Ci°;7 �ttornev that the contract is satisfactory. applicant or contact person date i S 32-04'5,?"E LOT 3/ 251 ��2 / sq ff 0 I PS 9 s 56 � 95 � 029 20 5 �122 3,472 sq. ff ( To be deeded to James O'Brien)4116,, LAND OF DAMES O 'BR/EN 122.59 d = 36 R= 5 L = 3 CPO N 85 �39'S cn 20.26 N8,5�39,40 A c 1 SPOKES & OBUCHOWSKI ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. BOX 2325 RICHARD A. SPOKES SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 JOSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI WILLIAM G. LIVINCSTON STEVEN F. STITZEL June 16, 1980 Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator David Spitz, City Planner Municipal Offices 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Brookwood Gentlemen: 1775 WILLISTON ROAD TELEPHONE (802) 863-2857 In connection with the above entitled development, please find enclosed the following original documents: 1. Offer of Dedication of ten (10') foot wide storm drainage +/ easement between Lots 21 and 22. This must be signed by Bill Szymanski for the City in the presence of two wit- nesses who must also sign where indicated, and Bill's signature should be acknowledged before a Notary Public. The Offer should be recorded in the City Land Records. �r 2. Easement Deed for above. This should be kept on file until the Council is prepared to accept the offer of this ease- ment. 3. Offer of Dedication for two (2) pedestrian easements. This again must be signed by Bill with two witnesses and an acknowledgement and recorded in the City Land Records. 1 4. Easement Agreement for fifteen (15') foot wide easement ti affecting Lots 7, 8, 9, 10 and 13. This must be filed until the Council accepts the easement. At that point it should be recorded in the City Land Records. �j 5. Easement Agreement for fifteen (15') foot pedestrian easement affecting Lots 1 and 2. This also must be filed until accepted, at which point it must be recorded in the City Land Records. J 6. Offer of Dedication for street. This must be signed by Bill with two witnesses and an acknowledgement, and re- corded in the City Land Records. Richard Ward and David Spitz June 16, 1980 Page 2 v' 7. Warranty Deed for street consisting of two segments. This must be held in escrow until the street is accepted by the Council as a public street at which time the deed should be recorded in the Land Records. 8. Offer of Dedication for drainage easement affecting Lots 21, 22, 31, 1 and 2. This must be signed by Bill with two witnesses and an acknowledgement, and recorded in the City Land Records. 9. Easement for drainage over Lots 21, 22, 31, 1 and 2. This must be held in escrow until the Council accepts the ease- ment at which time the deed should be recorded. By copy of this letter I am asking Steve Crampton to furnish you with the Vermont Property Transfer Returns which must accompany the above documents. Those should be delivered directly to your office. Steve and I understand that a drainage easement is no longer necessary between Lots 6 and 7. If our understanding is erroneous would you please advise both of us. I am also asking Steve by copy of this letter to furnish the following to me at his convenience: 1. Language he plans to utilize in deeds in connection with drain- age Swale on Lots 14 through 21. 2. Language for planting covenant pertaining to Lots 13, 10, 9, 8 and 7. 3. Language for deed to Lot 21 prohibiting direct access on to Sherry Road. I believe with the exception of those items noted above, all docu- ments are in appropriate legal order from the City's standpoint. -v V truly yo rs -_ ,. r Ric rd A. es- RAS:mil Enclosures cc: Stephen Crampton, Esq. P.S. I neglected to mention that I have also enclosed the set of plans which David Spitz furnished to me. fie_ BrVC4 �t !,,ay 16, 1900 Mr. John Stuart Environmental :assessment Group, Inc. P. O. Box 246 Winooski, 1%7T G5404 Re rrookwood LTD., Plans dated April 26, 1979, with Revisions Dear John. I have reviewed the above referenced Mans, and approved then: with a few notes to clarify approval. The vain area of concern is the type of fire hydrant you have indicated. The kennedy K-11 is not acceptable to the South Burlington stater Department. The typA of hydrant required by the Department is noted on the plans. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Sincerely, SOUTH BURLINGTON KATER DEPT. Robert L. Gardner Superintendent RLt./sp cc: E. Blake Fd. Szymanski D. Spitz M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Stephen Page, former Planner Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items Date: 10/5/79 #2 Business Park North Resubdivision There are no substantive issues to be resolved, and no changes to the plan since you last saw it. #;j Spafford Subdivision (now called "Brookwood") The plan has been revised to satisfy the conditions of preliminary plat approval, a draft of the convenants has been approved by Dick Spokes which will preserve the important concept of building envelopes. I have a list of minor modifications which pertain to the legal do cuments and can be in- corporated into a motion of approval. #4 Vermont Broadcasting Subdivision All is O.K. #5 Nowland Subdivision I suggest the final plat carry the notation, "Reserved for Future City Street", immediately south of lot #2, to make it perfectly clear to the lot buyer where access to the balance of the land should be located, and where the potential east -west street may go. #6 1 lot subdivision at 162 East Terrace The division of a 1 + acre lot, is proposed to create a.6 acre lot with an existing dwelling on it, and a.4 acre lot (large enough for a duplex). All City services are at the site. The existing dwelling should be plotted on the plan to insure that the new dividing line does not create any non -conforming situations. #7 Site Plan Review, Plvwood Ranch The applicant has agreed to improve screening and revise landscaping. The re- visions to the plan will be presented at the meeting. #8 Site Plan Review for former Lake Champlain Motors building The building's owners wish to obtain site plan approval for revisions to existing access, parking, and circulation, to serve a future tenant who is as yet un- determined. I assume this is'being done to improve the marketability" of the proposal. Access is substantially improved, through the closing of two old curb cuts on Allen Road, and the installation of a new one farther away from Shelburne Road. Parking is being increased to a total of 42 spaces; circulation is sufficient, although I question the _advisability of the dead end service road to the north of the building. Also, the grading plan doesn't make,it clear whether or not fill or surface water will be diverted rtc, the adjoining property to the north. In any event, there should be a site plan review of this property when a particular client has been found. r-%c,j?l '. AeKeewf r- VIA Nurlington Nirr UquAment 575 Dorset *trert *nut4 Nurlington. 13ermnnt 05401 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF September 10,1979 Mr. Craig Spafford 14 Cliff Street Burlington , Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Spafford, On Friday September 7,1979 a set of plans marked drawing #1 of 6 dated April 26,1979 of the Brookwood LTD development were reviewed by this office. The only problem found was the hydrant in front of lot #6 on Brookwood Drive must be relocated to lot #11 on Brookwood Drive. Over all in my opinion I feel the development has been well design for fire protection and emergencies. The set of plans have been to Mr. Page the city planner. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 863-6455. Sincerely .dames^ W. Goddette Sr Chief cc Mr. Steve Page City Planner City of South Burlington 1175 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 �'••. , . �•'' TEL. 863-2891 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER WILLIAM J. SZYMANSKI August 20, 1979 District #4, Environmental Commission 111West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re': Oakbrook Pines Subdivision South -Burlington, Vermont Gentlemen: The above referenced project is in conformance with the comprehensive plan (per attached memo), and will' -be served by water and sewer facilities in conformance with City standards. Final design and construction will conform to municipal standards. Very truly you , William J. Szymanski City Manager WJS/b SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SOUTH BURLINGTON, VGRMONT 05401 FREDERICK H. TUTTLE Superintendent LAWRENCE E. LECOURS Assistant Superintendent Mr. Craig Spafford September Farm Road 1 Starksboro, Vermont 05487 Dear Mr. Spafford, OFFICE: SOUTH BURLINGTON HIGH SCHOOL 550 Dorset Street July 26, 1979 At their regular meeting on July 25, 1979, the South Burlington School Di- rectors voted that your project, as outlined in your letter dated June 6, 1979 would not place an unreasonable burden on this municipality to provide education,. services. Because of the concern for the safety of our student;>, it is requested that sidewalks be provided in conjunction with the roads to be constructed. This will allow students to walk safely to and from bus stops. I am enclosing a copy of our transportation policy for your information. Please note item #4 under the ad- ministrative guidelines - "Buses will not be routed over private roads." The following information may be of assistance as you or your associates Meet with prospective clients: Grades K-5 Central School Williston Road - South Burlington Grades 6-8 Grades 9-12 Middle School 500 Dorset Street South Burlington High School 550 ✓nrset Street South Burlington If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. FHT:cl enc. ✓cc: Mr. Stephen Page Mr. Lawrence LeCours Mr. John Lucas All Building Principals SincErel you��r��s Fr-ederick H . Tuttle Superintendent of Schools M E M O R A N D U M To: Planning Commissioners, neighborhood residents, and others Re: Site inspection of drainage at Oakbrook Pines Date: 7/2/79 There will be an on site inspection of the Oakbrook Pines development on Monday, July 9 @4:30 p.m.,meeting at the end of B� ookwood Drive. U �0�✓r)I/ �<f2D -- 7�,3 G'c�.000�c � ��, JE Planning Commission Charles Tillinghast - 12 Woodside Drive Nile Duppstadt - Old Pump Road, Jericho, VT 05465 Craig Spafford - 14 Cliff Street, Burlington, VT Bruce Latelle - 84 Oakwood Drive Kenneth E. Wales - 92 Oakwood Drive Greg A. Roberts - 15 Woodside Drive John W. Rowe - 13 Woodside Drive Gerald M. Parot - 11 Woodside Drive Norman H. Reuss Jr. - 9 Woodside Drive Jack A. Provencher Sr. - 7 Woodside Drive Stephen W. Maglaris Jr. - 5 Woodside Drive Morris R. Wilcox Jr. - 915 S. Prospect Street, Burlington, VT Joseph N. Paire - 1 Woodside Drive Valentine P. Kupiec - 27 Sherry Road John Finnigan - 25 Sherry Road Kevin A. Sheffield - 19 Sherry Road ?� Tr -7o-7 io of c4 icm * i -V#tQ' To .aa-o 6P �peUFtt tZ -� mac. {r� ROE P ht�td t '� `ice 0.SC" D-LOT wwf uo ,e►ccr--hs gAVA, LVr 7,1 -ro OW - PP. June 29, 1979 Mr. Craig Spafford 14 Cliff Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Craig: This is to formally confirm the action of the South Burlington Planning Commission in approving your preliminary plat on 6/26/79. The minutes of the meeting are enclosed, which specify the conditions of your approval. We should meet soon to discuss: (1) what needs to be done prior to advertising for the final plat hearing, (2) what will be needed for the Commission to take action on your final plat, and (3) content add timing of paperwork needed prior to the start of any work on site. I am tentatively scheduling the site visit to look at drainage for the second week of July - I'll call you with a specific time and date. As we discussed over the phone, your attorney should contact ours regarding an "ironclad" mechanism to protect the approved building envelopes from intrusion by variances. Sincerely, Stephen Page, Planner SP/mcg 1 Enc 1 P.S. - All the copies of the approved plan have disappeared - would you please drop off a couple prints? October 12, 1979 ' Mr. Nile Duppstadt Old Pump Road Jericho, Vermont 05465 Re: final plan application - Brookwood Dear Mr. Duppstadt: Be advised that the South Burlington ;Planning Commission approved the final plat application of Craig Spafford for a 31 lot subdivision, as depicted on a plan entitled "Proposed single family dwellings ---Brookwood Ltd", drawn by John Stuart, dated 4/26/79, revised 5/79, and 7/79 subject to the following stipulations: 1. The final plat shall be recorded within 9U days and include the following revisions: relocation of fire hydrant from lot 6 to lot 11, storm drainage easement (to the City) extending the length of the "existing watercourse", and revised building envelopes for lots 11 and 26 to provide 3U' setbacks from book streets, the width of the storm drainage easement shall be as determined by the City Engineer. 2. The open drainage swale to the rear of lots 14-21 shall be maintained by those property owners and enforced through covenants affecting those lots, the City of South Burlington shall be a party to these covenants. 3. Bonds for all required improvements shall be posted, in amounts acceptable to the City Engineer, prior to issuance of site development or building permits. 4. The agreed upon revisions to storm drainage, and swwer and road profiles shall be included in redrawn submissions. 5. If permission of Rand Corporation can be obtained, the balance of the existing drainageway (to the Interstate culvert) shall be cleaned out to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, to improve flow. 6. The deed for lot 21 shall contain a covenant that there is to be no vehicular access to Sherry Road. 7. The two pedestrian easements, the storm drainage easement, and City Streets shall be secured in advance through offers of irrevocable dedication. Mr. Nile Uuppstadt October 12, 1979 Page 2 8. The westernmost 75' of lots 7,8,9,1U, and 13 shall be encumbered with covenants to maintain the integrity of the planted buffer strips. 'Lhe text of these covenants, as well as those affecting drainage on lots 14-221, shall be as approved by the City Attorney. RO / Inc i, Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Uff icer l 6/26/79 ' SSP SUGGESTED MOTION OF APPROVAL - OAKBROOK PINES I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of Craig Spafford, for a 31 lot subdivision known as Oakbrook Pines, as depicted on the plan of record, subject to the following stipulations: 1. This approval contingent upon formal confirmation of school capacity. 2. 3 new hydrants are to be added and one existing hydrant is to be relocated. The location of these hydrants on the final plat shall be as approved by the Fire Chief. 3. C.W.D. approval of water plans, and the City Engineer's approval of final engineering on storm drainage and sewage disposal shall be a prerequisite to action on the final plat. 4. The project name shall be changed so as not to resemble names of other projects or streets. 5. A recreation fee of $1939 shall be paid. 6. The building envelope for lots 11 and 26 shall be reduced to conform to corner lot requirements, unless the City Attorney advises that the Commission is empowered to waive them. 7. The exact location of the 2 public pedestrian easements (along the west property line and at the northeast corner) shall be determined at final plat. 8. Drainage along the south line shall be via a closed system; the responsibility for maintenance shall be determined at final plat 9. A sidewalk shall be added along 1 side (and to the endpoint of the cul-de-sac) the entire length of the new streets. 10. Power, phone, cable TV, etc. shall be underground. 11. Street lighting... 12. The stream on site shall be dredged and cleaned to improve flow; provisions for footing and/or basement drains shall be in- corporated into the final plat. 13. The building envelope of lots 2,7,8,13,23, and 24 shall be expanded to allow a larger building area and a 20' front yard setback. 14. A draft of covenants to be inserted in the deeds shall be submitted with the final plat for the following: (a) no windows on the structures facing the 5' sideyards (b) restriction of buildings to the building envelope recorded on the final plat (c) preservation of a planted buffer area along the Interstate (lots 7,8,9,10,13) SSP 6/26/79 Page 2 15. The final plat shall include a landscaping plan, which shall show how the existing large pines (lots 15-18) are to be saved where new plantings are to be added or relocated. 16. Building envelopes for each lot shall be shown on the final plat to be recorded. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Stephen Page, Planner Re: Next Meeting's Agenda items DateL 6/22/79 #2 Oakbrook Pines �) An alternate plan has been Based which conforms to zoning, maintains the same number of lots, and provides a continuous, low speed street system. However, the developer has not yet calculated the cost of the extra street construction involved. _ Since we have received conflicting petitions on layout, I suggest you favor a plan which conforms to zoning and of existing residences in the area. The alternate plan seems to fill this bill. At my suggestion, the developer has agreed to eliminate the private open space areas and enlarge the lots. The average resulting lot size exceeds 7200 square feet. This change also eliminates the expense and aggravations of a homeowners association; more importantly, the two proposed open space areas are needed for purposes of storm drainage and a sound buffer and thus are not suited for active recreation If these areas are privately owned, covenants or easements should be im- posed to prevent intrusion into areas needed for drainage or cutting of trees in the buffer area. Lastly, the developer will be assessed the $2000 1 recreation fee calculated for this site. The developer has agreed to the 2 pedestrian easements requested, along the Interstate, and along the water main easement. Sewage treatment plant capacity is adequate for the project; Bill Szymanski tells me that additional flow in the existing sewer network will improve the flow (by increasing velocity and reducing the potential for obstructions ). School impact has yet to be assessed. Traffic service is at "C" or better for the two nearest signallized intersections at the evening peak hour. Building envelopes and lot size distribution are forthcoming. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Rielley Tire& Oakbrook Pine's Date: 6/22/79 Reilly Tire 1. Fill slopes should be cut back to 2 orl 1 slopes to prevent sliding. 2. Ditch along church access road should be regraded. Oakbrook Pines 1. It would be more attractive and less likely to disturb root system of trees on lots 15 to 21 if an underdrain system were con- structed instead of open ditch. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Stephen Page, Planner Re: Next Meeting's Agenda items DateL 6/22/79 #2 Oakbrook Pines An alternate plan has been pr' which conforms to zoning, maintains the same number of lots, and provides a continuous, low speed street system. However, the developer has not yet calculated the cost of the extra street construction involved. Since we have received conflicting petitions on layout, I suggest you favor a plan which conforms to zoning and of existing residences in the area. The alternate plan seems to fill this bill. At my suggestion, the developer has agreed to eliminate the private open space areas and enlarge the lots. The average resulting lot size exceeds 7200 square feet. This change also eliminates the expense and aggravations of a homeowners association; more importantly, the two proposed open space areas are needed for purposes of storm drainage and a sound buffer and thus are not suited for active recreation If these areas are privately owned, covenants or easements should be im- posed to prevent intrusion into areas needed for drainage or cutting of trees in the buffer area. Lastly, the developer will be assessed the $2000 1 recreation fee calculated for this site. The developer has agreed to the 2 pedestrian easements requested, along the Interstate, and along the water main easement. Sewage treatment plant capacity is adequate for the project; Bill Szymanski tells me that additional flow in the existing sewer network will improve the flow (by increasing velocity and reducing the potential for obstructions ). School impact has yet to be assessed. Traffic service is at "C" or better for the two nearest signallized intersections at the evening peak hour. Building envelopes and lot size distribution are forthcoming. ,:�irr Department 'rabquarttrz DORSET STREET OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER 863-6455 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. June 14, 1979 Mr. Si(: Poger Chairman South Burlington City Planning Commission 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Pogery On Wednesday June 130979 plans were reviewed by this office on the Oakbrook Pine development and the following would be needed if we are to give proper fire protection. A. OAKWOOD DRIVE; extention to have two hydrants as located on plan marked by Steve dated 5/29/79 B. BROOKWOOD DRIVE: extention to have two hydrants as located on plan marked by Steve dated 5/29/79 . C. ALL roads and circles to meet city standards. It is still our feelings dead ends should not be allowed they cause many problems for emergency equipment. In ry opinion after reviewing the plan I feel the development could be designed and not have dead end streets. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Sincerely :T�oddette Sr. Chief I PUBLIC HEAR= SOUS ci BURLINGTON PLANNING COT 2-._ "S ION The South Burlington Planning Co,inunission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, __rune 12 _, 197 9, at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following: Z Preliminary plat application of Rene Berard for a 2 lot com-nercial subdivision, bounded by Airport Parkway, lands of the applicant,Auto Canteen Company the Citv of South Burlinaton� and the T,inooski River. Z.Preliminary plat application of Gerald Milot and Claude Gagne for subdivision approval to construct two 20,000 square foot office buildings on a 4.85 acre parcel of land at 200 Kennedv Drive, which is bounded on the south by KennedNT Drive, on the west and north by lands of the City of South Burlington, and on the east by Treetop Condominiums. .Preliminary plat application of Craig Spafforc for subdivision of a 10.5 acre parcel into 30 single familv lots, located west of Sherry Road and north of Oakwood rrive. The proposed subdivision is bounded on the north by lands of the Rana Corporation and Couture, on the east by Brookwood Drive, lands,of O'Brien, Francis, Kirby, Sheffield, Finnigan, on the south by Paire, v ilcox, Maglaris, Provencher, Reuss, Parot, Latelle, and Gero, and on the west by , 1-89. Copies of the ;;nnlirat ion s _are available for public inspection at the South, Burlington City Hall. May 26, 1979 Sidney B. Pocer, Cha irr.an South Burlington Planning Cor=ission M t M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items Date: 6/8/79 Oak Brook Pin 1. Pavement width at cul-de-sacs should be of such width that it will accomodate a parked car and leave enough room for a school bus to make a turn around. 2. The drainage ditch along the easterly side must be cleaned and dredged. 3. There should be provisions for accomodating basement and footing drains. 4. Water Department to review water line plans. 5. Sidewalk should be constructed along one side. 6. Gravel road base should be 18 inches thick. Ridgewood Estates 1. It would be my preferance to see this new street become a public street built to City standards to include curbs, storm drains, etc. 2. The flat grade approach to Swift Street as shown on the profiles should be longer (+30') to accomodate future widening of Swift Street to a 4 lane road. *..4 Office Building on Kennedy Drive 1. Sidewalk on Kennedy Drive is not located as shown. Profile of sidewalk at driveway shall remain as is. 2. Driveway should be located opposite drive to proposed housing development across Kennedy Drive. 3. Water 4epob shall review plans for water main extension. 4. Sewer system including force main shall be privately owned. ,3 Berard Development 1. Road construction to conferm with previously approved plans. 2. Percolation test and on site sewage disposal systems to be sub- mitted for each lot for approval. 3. Fire %ydrant near access to lot on Airport Drive may have to be moved if it is to close to driveway. Memorandum Next Meeting's 6/8/79 Page 2 Agenda Items Two other items were mentioned at sketch plan: 1) pedestrian trail - Gerry Olsen tells me there is no need for any pedestrian easement, since the City owns suitable land directly adjacent to this project. 2) parking- the amount of parking proposed is 1 space per 200 square feet of building area (as required by ordinance); based on a sample of 6 existing offices, a range of parking ratios aW from 275 square feet to 191 square feet (building area) per parking space was found. This would result in 140 to 200 spaces for Colony Office Park. Because of the distance of the parking lots from Kennedy Drive, and the uncertainly regarding specific tenant mix and parking demand, I believe a minimum of 140 spaces should be required, with an area designated for any necessary future expansion. #5 Oakwood Pines Preliminary Plat _......._ .,.p. w..�" The developer has provided 5' sideyards, as requested by the Commission, for the single family lots. After discussing the matter with Dick Spokes, it appears the best way to protect this cluster concept from future variance requests is to show the building envelope for each lot on the final plat, and specifically note it as a part of the approval; covenants to reinforce this stipulation should be required as additional back-up. I have enclosed a schematic layout to show that lots of this size are adequate for construction of modest single family names. With the addition of these 30 lots, there will be a total of 82 units in this residential area, with two access points to Dorset Street. I prefer the layout plan with 2 cul-de-sacs and no through streets, as shown. Most of the area residents who have stopped in to review the plans indicated a preference for no through streets. Jim Goddette will be submitting his comments on layout and water. I anticipate that this project will generate about 30 trips during the a.m. (75% out/25% in) and p.m. (75% in/25% out) ,, peak roadway hours. Based on Bruce Houghton's preliminary data, the approaches for the 2 nearest signallized intersections which would be used by exiting and entering traffic for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours re- spectively, are operating at "C" levels of service or better. Bruce O'Neil would prefer the recreation fee ($1939) in lied of land because of the proximity of recreation facilities at the Central and High School complexes and also because of zoning and topographic contraints on the parcels shown as open space. Some of this open space near the Interstate should be reserved for an informal play area. Other items to be resolved include: sidewalks, preservation of large existing pines, 2 pedestrian access routes on the west and northeast sides of the property, underground power, and routing of heavy construction equipment away from the Oakwood/Woodside area where there are many children. 280� V N O n M ZERO LOT LINE/PUBLIC CUL-DE-SAC 5 DU/AC Net Density 12 units on 2.38 acres = 5.0 DU/AC Gross Density 12 units on 2.51 acres = 4.78 DU/AC Average Lot Size 7,390 S.F. Site Development Costs/DU $5039 Cul-de-sac Total Street 8,200 S.F. 683 S.F./DU Total R.O.W. 14,924 S.F. 1,244 S.F./DU Pavement Width 20' R.O.W. Width 28' Turnaround Radius 45' Turnaround R.O.W. 98' x 98' I Subcollector Street (1/2 street and R.O.W.) Pavement Width 26' 3,636 S.F. 303 S.F./DU R.O.W. Width 40' 5,604 S.F. 467 S.F./DU C�1 Setbacks A Front Yard 20' (10' for garages parallel to R.O.W.) -- Side Yard 0' and 15' On Subcollector Street 20' 0 � Building Coverage ?t Average 1,500 S.F. Garage 300 S.F. Total Coverage 1,800 S.F. x 12 = 21,600 S.F. Driveway Coverage Average 500 S.F. Z Total Coverage 500 S.F. x 12 = 6,000 S.F. 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1) Name of Applicant Craig D. Spafford 2) Name of Subdivision Oakbrook Pines 3) Describe Subdivision (i.e. total acreaae, number of lots or units, type of land use, include gross floor area if comm- ercial.) In an-res, i0 l ats, mnrlerate inr'nmA gingi o fnmi l y residents 4) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record,applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: NONE 5. Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer John _Stuart P.O.Box 247 Winooski, 't. 879-7161 b. Surveyor Warren Robenstein Sunderland Hollow Road, Colchester 878-2359 c. Attorney _ Stephen Crampton 109 South Winooski Av Burl 658-0220 H. P1-t Desi^.ner Nile Duppstadt Old Pump Rd. Jericho 899-4739 iI 1 -2- 6) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since this proposal was last before the Commission: NONE 7) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all cont- igous properties: — See Attached 8) State title, drawing number, date of originFl plus any revisions, 1 ' and designer(s) of the preliminary map(s) accompanying this4appli- cation: Oakbrook Pines nQ drawing number and no revisions. Stuart and Duppstadt Designers 9) Attach a preliminary map showing the following information: 1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the city. 21 Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. 3) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical Features. 4) The names of all subdivisions im-ciediately adjacent and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. 5) The location and size of any existing sewers and w•rater mains, culverts and reins on the property or serving the property to be subdivided. 6) Location, names and widths of existing, and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks -3- ) and other public or privately maintained open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. 7) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of proposed finished grades where change of existing ground elevation will be five feet or more. 8) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. 9) Numerical and graphic scale, crate and true north arrow. 10) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative mans of providing water supply to the, proposed subdivision. 11) Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provision for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 12) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposedlocation and results of tests to ascertain subsurface toil, rock � and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results of percolation tests. 13) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. 14) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culverts which may be required. 15) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic lay- out in the field. Unless an existing street intersection is shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. 16) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 10) Developmental timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates) No phases start as soon as planning approvals are completed. 11) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: NONE M 12) Attach a vicinity map showing the following: 1) All existing subdivisions, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the record oti.m ers of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street ad- joining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing1filed or proposed streets, curb cuts, easements, buildiug lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the plaited area together with its street system end an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the sub - divider's entire holding. f signatu e) aoTA'ca or contact person sate 1; I, f-' Ci rn C1 lft al C1 1 It I C) Q1 14-1 .,1 r-q -H !, 'o (n it P4 U) C: 411.10 0 0 rc 4 rp C', a) •1.1 al r-A w 0� 1�1 I ) i U) C)i U I cJ ul H > 4j rq 011(i C: 44 0 a) !01 1.1, F: U) L:, Qj,-, ., 0 W I I,C; L) (1) co I all C') C) U;! te a) W; 9,: I Oj: (D; of) rc-I 41 ca � .,-I CO Q —I CU X11 •Ii C" 171 Ct_j 41 �. •rI 1-1 Iff U I (It Ill a) *0' ku I I IN kv -1i ctj I, V.) $4 (1) Q; -H W i (1) L-) V1,.1 .,I 'C'. ;-. 'I.: :1 4� 4-1 1.1 a, r/j; -Ctl Q) Cl W (P I QI J1 r- 'm 1 0 -1 1, 01) Q cd C�j cu fl 01 fj) f 0 C: .11 ul 14 w ou .11 11 .r-j r-A 4) CH 44) [, C: " 0 03 1,:: r-f 10 0 N W 0 4-) CA, J) id 4, r-1 ­4 0 -, 1 41 *-1 to W rr3 S, at r-4 It) -(i t, G 0) -[J 4 1 N, -(j rid Eli f ! :3 (U W CO) r/j 0 U) l I Tj -r-I r 1 -1 1 U w L) J,.: I I rl " I iLl {I +-I C, I' -, I :-. 0) Gj +1 Q, ,L: U C) U C) ill 6 1-; al 11) :3 C) 4, 0 a) I..j u U) w :-I F a) P, r-( th .., i ., 44 C, CI a) L, CV I -t-3 () +- " 4-) is 0 C, Oj 'u W I tl� i�j Ili .,I 'cl 1AJ L: �c 41 G) f-i rCJ Ir-i I k) -4) ", W ( o-i -rj 0 W 4) w w w 1.4 rl a) w -ri $. -,3 , C:(ki w 41 1, I Q;-f 11:1 :> (01 w 41 It . (u I its '11 V) 10 0 di (1) • J:' t" Oj : I ,- (I -#• 41 C"j 0 11 (1 It W X :A L. 0 rf Qj to w G] 41 U) ;I W to Lu -is It% 0• aj I i Q k!) jj it: (j t al $4 4a Ed 0 4J I, : ol 0 C) (1) to -4 0) DJ .,1 -41 I.J ... I, I) 4, -+j CU ti -,A 0 L I !, 111 4-4 0) IA +41 ul It I 4-b 1c: -ri C 44 11 UJ W U, O W r-1 -*- 4-1 Ul t 1 F. rl -rf it, 6 0 4-3 4) C) L.) -r-j t:: Cl x 4, oil CO I i I ! : cj 4) P. 'Lj (4, LI, cli C- (" (U A; $,t to IL, 41 -1 , 1) :4 r1 I) J-: IKJ 11 'Ej +) C) C.) to I , I : ) C3 .1-1 Ef] .11 1i W Q Li ti CU I, ., I .0 f. (D r-t aj 0 to I.: ILI 0 I", ci 11; 4) 'C' Cj ,I 'D 01 1,, ;tG, r-i -rl -H -4J " I -P C-0 41 C, , 11-: 4 G -3 It) all ::J a) Ej .41 'CI 0 • 0 w Erj it) 'U r-I -,-I I-b 0 rj ',-, r-i (11 r , U) C; ") ::: . ri CU t�) a) Ell o Ca ::1 -4 1 f C, Q, 41 ri CO U, s: 6.1 QLI 4.1 •(j 4-1 .,1 0 W (it 0 � W 4 0 Il t-, a) kl 0 r-1 il 61! +) 0 ti (1) 0. 4 +J L) U i7- I Li U) —1 71 C.I 0 (1) W -P ill 10 j-.; 0 t'j F, V k1l C) ILI ": u: I 0 ill Ej 41) #- Qj Oj tu t: !j -, I 'i, Q., It ''I-' 4. OJ C:, --i -*- , A4 .11. r~, :J ',a a .i: -, 1 41 oll ri (ji ,L, 0 w Oj 0 C, .. 1 0 t .1) 41 r-4 , ; u .,-t 0 al l.y 4.1 U) V1 tu W Q) •(I " Q) -i� —4 GJ (I) P I, P. w 0 0 1-1 4.) (U ED c3 I. II It 4 p j I I it,' , C; 0) cu vi I F. 1,3 'ri 0 ( I 1 1 :1 (1) '1 W), Ij GI 4•) fj ., I L; 4' .14 4, al Cj kit 0 11 0 .', 1 11 L) it) .-; C,) 4' 'r. F; L I of 0 oij ILI w -, i 'CJ !6) aj ;-1 r-I to a xj F, fu -rj to j.1 w 44 0 0 0 L 0 U) s:: 0 0 U Cj LO ill "t 0 to 41 ij ul 0 a) 11, t.j ;1 C3 " , "': d) -1 +1 fj 0 .,-1 a Q : i. 0 W41) Iti •0 44 01 4J +1 C) 4-) a) 'Ej -I ti 4� a) -r-f -rI t--) W p r-I . I u IV) A N " 0 OJ G1 0 '171 Q) 0 C: 'd 4-1 L-I tri 17 4j -I -j 4) x rtl i. U) 4' 11 -Jj 03 a) P �: il. r-1 -H r-I 0 4-1 r-I 01 . ,Cl V 0 (,-1 U; - 41 4) ul ill -P r-i -11 V4 0 W , I., ;G (11 C) -ri rl 4-3 0 4) 0 ; 4 ,1 . -I t,.j F-i 1-, 0) f� 4- ;a Q) -44 -H IIJ • (1) W Q I al 41 C) r-I Q CI P. rl _ I . t : 0 r, 0" C*, r-4 cu C.) - I. �i Q) Ll) 0. n 0 41 0 .44 F. cd Ea .11 r'., 11) �:) b Eli 4-2 Q) (It 0 Q kt, .9 Q) -1 qj ;j Q t1 17" 14 L: ,. 1-1 -0 +1 Ll 0 pf a, +j 4) v l r-4 -,4 0 :-1 1. N cj 0 Q) rf 41) -4' w 0 rl Id; •0 40 U) -tl --I • Lu ID Ct to -ri ild 0 1' 4-1 0 ill J: I-: ", 0: -1' Q! 4-1 rI w '" :-, -6 1 on U) .11 0 W rao W Fi I Ili in I to (U (ll iN P i0 ,N •ri i•r1 P1 Y tit (1) Iw 0 •rl 4-1 q co )r FA M C) O U 'cl . (DI 1~ 'dI I 1 c; FYt O W, tU I N W (;I �1 4-1 v fI 0' (; ,C • •r1 4-4 U) 41 O nl rl N U) 4-1 's a rt iu C) P •ri w f.11 v' th F, u 1 ). tll • irF1 �Y I+ ♦' •',I r OII IU*N- W C) 14r WIO •, I r•�'f� N , ? i1�ct1 I OO rli W tulW •,-i «3 4-1Ir, ti ,41 ri . Cl I'C1 N N r'1 •ui I •r-+ � 7 •f1i W 'o�. lip U) (j) I r� W 1 PJ C-i rc1 a a, u) 'o U 0 };: r� l0 iU h.) •rl Y, i ti , r 4 1! + O C .0 In 1 [t W U a, it •ri ul $4 tU) ri W CH W C. R 9 W 4, , . U cd 9: N 0 O N W N ++ At 4) ,O +' 1. '•, W 4, 1-1 t: •ri O •ri W -0 U) W rr) ka) ri 2] W O CU ++ C: 'd +1 ;1l 'U rd At F7 r-f 11 a W ,s 0 1' is [f a .' U) UJ U U) f, 'r1 •r1 ri •r1 O «1 U L. r1 ,'.l i 'C1 14 i4 N •,-i w 0 .`.• i1 r f: 11 •C) ++ ,-; •r 1 ;•, Cil W •/� a ,�; U U a+ rl ,L .0 r i I.) t') 0) U t11 U ., .t: w ;7 U -f, +J C) a N IJ If) ,U U) IU •r, �•) W G, t„) i •, I ., .11 [, ,L .0 0 (f) U1 '� F, a /•, ..1 1D i, W t.; i- 1 ❑, , 1 w ? .-I t.J 4, I~ Ul rl .' )+, +j C) «1 - :. k) ,L: .1:: I CV F1 •ri (1) -r' O +-b 11 U ,L: ,': •ri I' it! U f, t1, I O 4J is U C: IV U, , +•+ • F1 i ., ,C: w r -f) sA +) U) to a .C; U) a w I•. ,-1 'd 4, •rl •U YJ +) (I1 v, •J 4, 'r) 0 t ,1 to a Fi H O W •r1 O [;' ;3 ('1 •• L: ) of ,t; at t't to ;I - $1 S , l.! W c: (d +) W r-i ti r-i •, i O • ;3 ! I at ++ 0 11 1. ,U 4J O 0 • 4-3 :', O C, .,a "A W 4, k. 4. ,s w ff Ul f) tU r-1 In O 0 +) w U1 at +• (1 1, 'U •(, U Ul F. C) (•; r1 I1: LJ W W rd •n Fy :3 (: «1 .,1 Y1 U 1 4) ,+ ,U v� +• a .-i l.l1l•1 L; o ? cU U! W .0 +1 W •' ,G •' i ;,; w •rl i' W tit 1"; t; •rl •,-i W U, ,` 'U C.: t: fn (1) ,O f v i Al at ;> (n 'd U Ill W • >~ W t, W U U at a f I L: :1 :. 0 0 -0 i1 Ft •d C) It 'u a .t: to • r1 W '1 01 •0 at rl IU, i-) :t US 11. Q: (. N ,+ N •(i a (t O r, i. '0 W F, W f: I,u•,f U, O to w 0) •d ,i. •t is F w (d a ,l: : • ,C: (.) F. F, f•t L: W a t) FY C, 1-0 '11 ' •f' :•, v' . U, ,U 41 Li •ri U W ,-1 ')f W 41 C• •('1 I' .. 4, 'tl v, O d1 Ill 41 () 11J r, ,(1 -t •,I •, �N ♦1; '0 "J , 1-1 U F, {� ,•. a AI i1i •; U () 'cj ,•. F, 0.1 Q) N fl j:. 'I) U 1, ,• U al .(; a ill Y1 •ri fi w ++ (� .) YJ N •-i ,i; ,r: }y f/ O i+ W .c; t, •tt f,,, (, +' .' t;1 41 O ,tt L; U) fv (1) 0 O r-Y I - G: O C; [-, t•J 4-1 41 F, '0 1. , IL] Si i' F, N F, f) ,L1 to a C] .'ir ++ W [1 •ri O lu 1 I (it •, 1 , t l ( ) r r; U1 ih tll I',•r1 (1) -11 U ++ 'r '1) r.1 44 (1) ,(: U r1 t; 'it -, i•) :, r, N, L) 4) ;t .. -1 4-) .(; •rl W +-1 11 U] i W U) , ('I «I U1 U W r-1 h -/+ -P (n f! F, Cr, +' ( ) • t •; / W ri •rl It) Ill •r 4 O U iP ;> W O U •14 C: 0 at i) «t I : ,k, 1.) fit r t N I i I I 'd W '0 w (u W CH 4-1 W A, f •l ,--i ,•.; ,.' a s t, is t: W ' SI -ri l0 a i) 1 a ti r-1 J) 1: 10 ,ii 'U +) 'U 4) () r+ ,C: 11 •rl .0 -H") Iu U 4-1 f1 ;] -o -H U) ;3 u W C'-f 4ti f-- NW a 4, N ,) [, N i.. :. • Ft I ,) F, a) r-I a U W � 'To 0 1_ W ':. a) A r(-a , t: C) LL, U :: 6 „ :s r1 t' W N -H-f-1i C; ++ t..) •t :•, 0i2 ,) u 1, (p -0 ` , a ) ,'-I UI 4-1 (1, t-; 0 ,p ." G W :3 (/1 .' w 4-1 ti $ a u , C) .; U I 4) 4) al O V. rl • -1 O U) W (U rc) W r-1 •,-i U) 41 .0 t t: •) O ti) «3 U F 4 }t rl rrj :•+ ,-1 W ri U) W U) :; •ri CO t4 a U) O Q :3 :t r) '11 11 U •, 1 4 , to +) r-1 N Li is W Rj a) 4- In 4- •,1 O iq - •n I) ..-1 •rl 0 11.tt 1a1 1 01 • •C1 (1) C) :'-, 1, •,i O U Vt t vi •r1 a t-! 1-I :.L W ff I a F. O FY O r-1 N ,Y W 4•1 :• O U • -, [1 41 LO i; Ia ;i r i) ,J 0 , -f W ,01 +) f ' +' U U i-, f J ?, U Li W F 1 r-i a: I : w .1 W t: O ,.� r I � ; a 0 41 ul u, " .:: la (n a (U: , 1,) t, ; , ,,) ) ,a O ;: : , U tat W W +., N cu n'd Li w G: t,.) •;I ,, ,n y, co 1, +t ,•1 +3 Lg .L1 P, ;y ;4 rU .D W N ,t: •, 1 i' f, tU 'd O w O w W U C' I .. •,-1 O YJ F1 i' 111 a at f t r-f W U) •rl ) ; w 'cl 4 'd , , O i ., N S-t ij U) U) W (4 4) 'n 'I ;+ rl -P - 0 t� • 4 W W f f, P, (u O O 1-1 44 W u' d i) F. '0 Qt (, 1 c' d, U :) t,u 11 W I t, a N Ul J, 3 -0 W O t;, 1-1 r3 n O U t I '•, :L F, O .' i 11i G ) + + . U 11N 43 lU1 F l i.• •r-i �, rl U1 .-, U 4) -: a1 C-, O 1" • ++ '3 • :' .1, O t,, (.) W i+ i L; i+ f Fi R1 A*" L; L I at W N O U) 11 U) W .!A W [, w •r1 Rt •C ) ; -H 91 W (u •fi •r1 [f +" U O w A •ri 't1 U :' LL, U1 U v) O 91 'rl :: t;.) W 'r, r-t 1-' 1.: C7 al k� N -H Id IQ F. Al 10 N i'.ut . W 4J O 41 O O �' L + O U) 1~ 41 O U U O «t ,O w ,Ll i+ 4, :c «t 't / U) 0 U «! ) I f W -f, i) •, i U) Q a 4• Al k) c) Cl ;-, ' • a) •J) C) -N f:'1 U •r+ ;f • ,G ,D is O N ,�•t W 4] 10 Y t Q1 i+ ++ U +) w )'•, 'd r-1 [t i, W W •rl •rf ►-) U q N 7 r-1 , 1 U 111 ) •'1 -1 W W '0 F� N W C)R1 4) O iti 'd 4-1>;' 'a N at 4J ,-I ;3 to a; R1 {, -i I , w i•' .(.; .(: > : +.3 N W Lt .: is H •ri H C) r-t 0) ,D Ft U ti S w Y • w It 1 C: W r, Jt (n C: tlt -13 N -,IC: •rl "I it a W U ;f r1 (1) f) •r1 W (1) lU r, P. 44 ++ +) O a O C: :1 • 1 • . • [t •rt I%, [, w ,C: 11 ,•, r1 lw r, )I :7 }I F+ • P, a) 'ti - f: i� ;G 'C1 .]) ,O fI 41 W t1, 41 .l1 i-) •ri «l • (1, w '7 lW 1=1 Q, O a 4� O r1 w U IIJ O 1•4 C) tti . �3 1 •ri O [) in 11:: H W Z T rf U U, lu o, (1, ,+ •rl O ++ (" [i O +) W W of a I.J U U, • +) a (1) 'ri O CJ w :t W f: 41 4; N R1 a ,i 4 • i+ G 4, t: �L,, 'o '1 G7 [, ,l' 1- O '; t; r11 . [� O l �, '(t ,1 14 ;1 � I') W ;-ti +3 1) - O F-f IL 41 41 •rl f', •,i U) ;1 N :,C •u t: C: , .t1 1:-, N 'U ,.: U W N •r1 w rJ r-1 1t O W ,+ at f-i i1 U •ri +) 'C O rt `.() -0 Y-) U) U •ri 'd U L, 41 r1 ,tl ;l •` w •,1 a F, it) 4.1 P 4' 11 C: a) •ri •Ct 111 •d Y+ t: ;.7 W w U, o t. ,, CI ,:" 41 01 a ,i. .(: ,.' 0.'n U ;c F. (, is t) 4, :; C) i1 •rl W Y) at U) •U rt J O ,,; .) ;] (l t' ,I; a) 0 t•` Ji it) �1 R� •J C 11 r 41 N Cil 41 rcY ,Ct r r. vI rl G1 ) n N , +'41 f: 4•, r .-i to Ili O U (ll .' 1' rjico 0.1 EiOf Cj f.: •rl (•' (.1 r�, C; Fti 1-I O I:1 F( , -: �) +� N c, 0 v r uS F, i; •Cf 4 Q, (.1 U (1, N l + t. I fit •r1 "!-, .. .,� , ; :• CV .. I ''i +' ,7, rl 0 fl) CO •[l J lJ F-I N li C; Fi 4, .. :'! C•. co U l(1 !J •1� ny LI i•i Ci' 1`) .d •r l U r) v) (7 F/ (11 •r1 u, Fr I t., t! -/' F' r1 -1-+ .b. lU t+) rt: i-/ i� .-� i.: .l, Ci : , 1 � U: •,+ f, (;.; rrY 'cS O C, t%1 c, r t I 1' ,�' L F, ri -I-> CO 'C'1 r-.I CJ - J .`-: 'fY Fr Ct I U 0) L-, W fit' �-' r;. .+� {., Q) .0 •rt W vl L� 'd 21 '7 ,. ; 'Ct 1 F I u'. r (l, '. i' to (-, -.: u! P: Fi f: lj �� V •�) O CO FI d) I) 49 iJ n ul ri r-1 :ku ri t,0 t: 4- 'U 4-/ U C' i•; F, �� U •ri F-I r , ; •rl (''. th 'CJ •� I L-I v-1 N t.• I' N y, tb) (r1 F1 41 I' .. .(: -i+ C) �:' C-i •r1 UJ Q) +•+ • 44 C: (li 1; O /• rtJ 'u Sy •ri U r-1 W 'd Cti 3 ,-1 U 11 ( r N 'r; .: i•' ,U rl LJ 4-1 r-1 1' (,, :N '. ! ,., d) U) "1 Y t U FI O r-1 ,L: , VS (11 Ci ttl 'o f .1 'd F 1 N vl 4-1 't' -4' •,-t C) W ;f\ -1' J) R1 N 'Ci 7 FI .{ 4-1pl ./• 1, 1 U N UJ Pr Si >, ,C; i ,�'' i) ;i •1•� r-t U) -1-) Q r-i w ,(.; •ry (,, �' .ra 4! i], C) lll -/ •r•i 4-1-1:'1 'C; f!', 'rY ';J `..� r1 fG FI ,C) 4-1.d C) (t; L: r-1 r-1 .: ,:I F-` r-1 a.) ,C) O f. +-� FI t/1 r-,I I , (11 0l 111 ,'.i r'1 •r 1 "1 CU •r. '1' ' l ) FI f-I �l) Q r'••1 V) 6) (t1 4, CI! 4-1 N v: (1 W rl ,.• 0 C-) lU i U) n; ,r1 :.1 .. (� ul ,Il 'S !,� ''') U R.: y>' •rl lt1 +-) Q1 ' r :li '.l 'r1 • .. ,i '. F 1, ; •rl f� F 1 '1•� "1.'' ./ l ) Cif r . tl� `, i-( (I (, t,) ,t, ) : '.:1 ll� { •, I i l ; L' �. f/) + '.Y .1.� •,1 ,l] •ri rt Cl'. ".1 Ci o; I -1 G: Ci U tiU ri lU 'd ! !iJ U1 (11 q, .•) U) •rl •11 !,) fo •r'1 r-i Q) • C) r-1 Fti r-1 r•1 , F-1 F, •rl f r + • r'1 (L (ll it, i 1 . r-1 (l, C\' Ft (t! 1 U i . , tJ.l W C; ,U N F-, W r-1 N <) it .' i!1 , I U) ; r) ,)) O N •'U 'y (� 11: 3 l0 i' -41CI U rt -C' i II 4 PLA?v_'tiING COMMISSION PYAY 8, 1979 1. A landscaping bond of S7,000 shall be posted. 2. The requirement for parking space for 70 spaces is waived to the 50 spaces shown on the preliminary site plan conditional on the partial use as a computation and training facility. Any change in use or ownership would require review of the parking by the Planning Commission 3. A revised landsca-Ding plan shall be submitted for approval by the Flapper, There shall be no change in -planting srLecies but only in location. 4. The access drive shall be privately maintained. 5. This a-_�roval expires 6 months from this date. 6. The access drive shall be entirely on this piece of property. :r. Jacob seconded the motion and it passed on a vote of 5-1 with r`_r. Draper voting no. Sketch plan. review, 30 lot subdivision west of Sherry Road and north of Oakwood Dr. :r. :tile Duppstadt said that the parcel was 10.5 acres. The zoning is R4, there are pines on the site and a water main running through it. IYuch of the property next to this is zoned commercial. There are deed restrictions which require the construction of single family detached units and the parcel is an irregular shape. A 150' setback requirement from the Interstate impacts the parcel. The land is generally flat but a waterray runs through the northeast part of the land. The homes proposed for th-is z ro.;Erty are to be small and inexpensive. Mr. Poger said the city needed that. Mr. Duppstadt said that a zero lot lire approach had been tried here in an effort to get as many homes on the land as possible. One wall of each building would be on the lot line and that wall would be black, giving some privacy to the home next to it. This is permissible because this is a PRD. The lots will be 60' x 90' and with a zero lot line on one side, there can be a 15-20' side yard on the other. Mr. Duppstadt was asked to consider moving the homes to the center of the lot so that each home would have two narrow side yards instead of the zero lot line concept. The Commission felt that in a development such as this there would be a lot of people asking for variances to add to their homes and it would not be good to tut garages and other home extensions in the only space between the homes. It was noted that it might be preferable to preclude additional building in the side yards. The Conz:ission did not object to the density -proposed, but did not like zero lot lines. :-?r. Jacob suggested moving the homes forward on the lots to give the owners larger backyards. Garages could be part of the home, as in a raised ranch, or could go in the backyards. :1r. Ewing felt there should be about 20' between houses. , ir. Dra_er asked about the 150' setback from the Interstate. He was told that would preclude a road being built on that land and that to use that land a use variance would have to be granted by the Zoning Board. Mr. Page felt the Recreation Director would ask for a recreation fee instead of land in this case. -Some trees will be transplanted to cut down on noise from the Interstate. h:r. Duppstadt was asked about connecting the eastern cul-de-sac to Sherry Road but replied that it would be very expensive to do so. He was then asked about joining Brookwood Drive to Oakwood via a road parallel to the Interstate. 5 . PLANNING CO101ISSION I,AY 8, 1979 He replied that that would entail building more road and Mr. Page noted that it would be in the CO district. Xr. Ewing felt it would be good to provide for pedestrian traffic in this area, possibly over to the Rand land and that Zayres development. All utilities will be underground. I.r. Page said it might be good to draw the buildable area on each lot on the plans. :.. Spafford said tat t.ey had locked at the street running parallel to the Interstate at one time and it had not worked out, but they would 'look again. 'e also favored cul-de-sacs because they cut down on traffic speed. The homes will be 24' x 40' on the average. It was suggested that the houses, if possible, be longer than normal to leave more room on each $r the side yards and less in the rear. It was also suggested that their -setbacks from the road be staggered, to be 20' on some and 25' on others. ,,"r. Woolery suggested putting together some findings of fact on this proposal if unusual measures were allowed so the city did not have a lot of developers coming in and asking for the same measures. This jroject is for low cost housing and fills a specific need in the city. It can be noted that this is a special project and fills an overriding social deed. :sir. Stuart said that one reason for the two cul-de-sacs was t:at the developers warted to split the traffic from this project "up and not have it all dumping out onto Dorset Street at one point and this way peo-ple would be encoura:ed to take the shorter route out. The roads will be built to city standards. The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 pm. Clerk M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Oakbrook Pines Date: May 4, 1979 Under Section 6.30 the Commission has authorization to waive the dimensional requirements in order to encourage cluster housing. The proposed lots vary in size from 5,400 to 6,900 square feet with six lots conforming to the minimum required (10,000 s.f.) with the exception of the minimum frontage. Lot 1#2 has a minor stream, requiring a setback greater than proposed. Lots 6, 7 and 30 have little flexiability regarding the location of a structure. The legal ramification involved with a zero side yard should be reviewed by the City Attorney. Maintaining the structure could be a problem without some sort of easement or convenant. By setting off small lots we are creating a situation which would result in mass variance request to construct garages or carports. The concept of cluster housing is good, it would provide us with much needed low cost housing, however, we should have a legal en- forceable land restriction. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items Date: May 4, 1979 Stonehedge 1. Streets should be public, 30' width, curbs, etc. 2. Is a house planned for lot #10? 3. Water Department must review water main layout. O'Brien Property, Hinesburg Road 1. The road connecting Twin Oaks, Timber Lane and Castlerock should extend to connect Hinesburg Road and become a public street. 2. The most westerly cluster is on land that is very poorly drained. Oakbrook Pines` 1. Cul-de-sacs shall be City standard with pavement width sufficient for parking. 2. Drainage ditch from Sherry Road to Rand property should be dredged and cleaned. 3. Additional drainage catch basins will be required. 4. Water Department to review water main layout. 5. Manhole inverts on sanitary sewer in Oakwood Drive may have to be repaired before additional sewage flow is added to the system. 6. Transition in street width as shown on Brookwood Drive should be on right side of the street. Meadowood South 1. Additional storm water catch basins should be added especially near lots 36, 14, 30, 21. Maximum street drainage per catch basin should be 300 feet. 2. Water Department to review water main layout. 3. Streets should be City owned and maintained. Memorandum 5/4/79 Page 4 #7 Subdivision o DesLaurierspropertywest of Sherry —Road 30 clustered single family lots are proposed for a 10 acre parcel. Judging by the housing in the adjoining neighborhood and the size of the lots and schematic houses depicted on them,-tY-is appears to be a moderate cost housing project. The primary issues to be resolved include traffic impact and sewage capacity. Other items for review include school impact, recreation & open space, providing for pedestrian travel to the north, specifying building "envelopes" on each lot (especially #2 & #14) and the stream crossing for the extension of Brookwood Drive. This is the first project of appreciable size, in the last decade, to provide moderately priced single family homes. �r r] l�J�-dT1D►� TAP " o�RaDIL a�lk-�.S T ►,oKT+1 ►" ' Ate, t r N CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record Roland and Evangeline Deslauries b. Applicant Oakwood Pines Ltd. 1-1nr-t6F f 77 14 GLI rr- -_o &4 -. c. Contact personC,r�;g D�paffc,r� 434- 8 7 John Stuart 879-7161 Nile Duppstadt 899-4739 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels involved as well as proposed use(s). Development located at the end of Brookwood Drive, So. Burlington to be subdivided into 30 single-family lots (some lots to be built as zero lot lines.) 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) Option 4) Namesof owners of record of all contiguous properties 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Restricted to single family development. 20 foot easement for CWD water line. -2- t 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sewerage, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. Connection to Oakwood sanitary sewer. Water provided by CWD line that traverses property. 7) Describe any actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment, or previous actions by the South Burlington Planning Comrnission, which affect the proposed subdivision anyinclude dates: None to our knowledge. 8) Attach items a sketch 2 through plan 7 on showing all information required under p. 5 of the Subdivision Regulations. signature) appl: or contact person FOR OFFICE USE date - subc-Assion of application and sketch plan to administrativeate officer - this proposal is classified as a major or minor subdivision - application deemed complete - proposal tentatively scheduled for first Planning COMMission meeting on Confirmed For PROPOSED WORDING FOR INCLUSION IN SUBDIVISION LOT DEEDS The within Grantor does hereby establish, declare and forever bind himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, and does further declare the within covenants, agreements and declarations to run with, burden, benefit, and be binding upon the within des- cribed property as follows: In order to accomplish an uncluttered and uncrowded development which preserves and protects the actual open space and the feeling of same between and among the various residential lots within the development, no building, structure or improvement which does or in the future world require a building permit from the municipality shall be placed or constructed out- side the perimeter of the "building envelope" located within the herein conveyed property, said envelope being set forth and depicted on a plan entitled " dated and recorded in Map Volume at Page of the South Burlington Land Records. Further, the Owner of the within conveyed property does by the acceptance and recordation of this deed irrevocably waive any rights under present municipal ordinances, or as subsequently amended or enacted, to apply or seek to obtain a variance or take such other action which would alter or change the perimeter or shape of said "building envelope" and defeat the imposed setbacks from the lot boundaries of the within property established by the creation and approval of said building envelopes. This covenant applies to all lots within the aforementioned development and establishes a general scheme for the area and any one or more of the lot owners within the develop- ment shall have the right to enforce same and shall be entitled to cost and reasonable attorney's fees should he or they prevail in the enforcement of same. -2- 9Iz-717OH et���v� oK sow T4 ..��'" mud � � • i db D0�1W-1.1 CT- P*-tp P- wAT h4v JXh,c . Acco2'>S F-Few\ Wr z ( -W rf SEl /:) , 'HM CHEF W, +at,� PED e4orcui Wr1;;, �iel� � �4�� E•rlol� ,,T Slc-+1 tH 7 eX t G i a �1'11iG-1.FJPEt� 1 (.Off l(� r1.lo r Brookwood Ltd. Subdivision So. Burlington, Vermont Phase I Construction Item Unit/Quantity Unit Price A. Roadway Total 1. Grubbing 0.94 acres L.S.2. Cut/fill� ew 3. Gravel 1,500 CY _ 4. Pkami,,. 160 CY"� ziG 5 Pavement 315 tons �ucc> 'v. 111a ` 6 . rb ing 1, 2 6 0 LF '� _ .. o 110 LF ;� ., c��', nc► B. Water System ' 2 each 1. Tapping valve 2. Water main, 8" 414 CL 52 DI 720 LF '/ 4t 3. Hydrant 2 each 4. Services, 3/4" 15 each r '(15 C. Sanitary Sewer. 1. Sewer. main, 8" SDR 35 PVC 825 LF 2. Manholes 4 each 3. Services 1.5 each 4. Oakwood manholes, re -grout two man- hole inverts L.S. 5. Insulation for sewer main and ser- vices, 2+25--3-+-50 L. S . D. Drainage System 1. Catch b.isi.ns 2 each 2. 42" ACCHP with conc. headwalls 55 LF 3. 12" RCP 42 LF E. Underground utilities, ditching and backfilling L.S. F. Topsoil, seed and mulch, within R.O.W. limits L.S. 'op GO(,Cd� f�. cr. . C>Cj _ 2 VD Brookwood Page 2 G. Cleanup H. Site ecz;i.neerli I. Erosion control. Total Contract Amount L . S .: I-S. L,S. • a, -Notes. 1. Quotes for Phase I will be opened at 120 Lake Street at 10 A.M. on April 17, 1980 at the of- fices of JH Stuart Associates. 2. All construction will be in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Concrete side- walk and curbs will be in accordance with the City of So. Burlington specifications. 3. Gravel roadway base will comply with VT. HWY. specification, section 704.05. Pavement will meets section 406 standards. 4. All erosion control measures will be in -place prior to disturbance of the site. 5. Fill material will be taken from the subdivision site where directed by the project owners. Low areas created by the excavation will be re -graded to permit drainage of surface water. 6. Completion date of the above work will. be detail- ed in the construction contract which will. be pro- vided by the designated contractor and must be ap- proved as to content by the project owners prior to commencement of construction. 7. All repairs or tree damage due to contractor neg- ligence will be corrected or replaced at the con- tractors expense. 8. Testing; of sewer and water lines will be included in the prices quoted herein. 9. This document will be included in the final con- struction agreement. TERMS AND CONDITIONS ' DEPOSIT RECEIPT AND OPTION AGREEMENT Between Duppstadt, Spafford, and Stuart, and Roland and Evangeline DesLauriers 1. Option to expire July 10, 1979. If City of South Burlington Planning Commission has granted preliminary approval, then an additional 90 day option will be granted for a nonrefundable $5,000 that will be applied to the purchase price if and when land is purchased. 2. If purchased, terms of payment will be: a. 25% at closing - 5 year first mortgage note. b. 13.257o interest C. Interest monthly d. Principle every 6 months e. No pre -payment penalty 3. In order to allow development of individual lots seller will consider taking a second mortgage note on the property, providing that seller receives an acceptable pre -arranged payment each time an individual lot is sold. This agreement would be negotiated either before the second option is granted or before the final closing date. 4. If option is not exercised, plans and applications become the property of the seller. r'� c /(,-) D 0 E (�_YC7 �- r� z-3-77I z a I� Lk ✓ J /C cz_ I 2 i' 0 v f./ i Z/O 7-Z :17 f116 0 z co = -7 q I J, ¢ ow-kf� Pt.•�, �,1 t�c�s Mz- hT"5 Z/ 71 7, .�.--•-•---- -- '� �� � ,`� ! 9 39 Ta � Pry `-ENV I - - z Q�C.�Z • �.�/ors - �vi�{ - ice"" ��i� �,►�t�L-I" �, �u-J�(.., F�� � � � •. �� To �J�tal � � '�.ea�� c Q��cra� � fir. l-k`Cp l t CdVtp`.�' ND wuC1--2 a4 5 SIrJ�C,��p`.� C 2- L D 1Z °+3 176 }- f Vtdc.& SftW✓ slt,V1 10 'Pl.l�4 cf1 i�k C� Pt,b� t e 4E�/,rzLa--biE PCOX--t-W-EAA 651A V�4%, Sites p�►� 400t1M�► �c P /wpa carte+► 1�►;J �`U �vL� T� �E�� 1 Ao,F-- c►E-44,kE E We, the undersigned residents of Brookwood Drive, share the concerns of our neighbors in regards to: 1. Drainage - Current high water table in the area. 2. Sewage treatment plant - system is overtaxed. 3. Failure of Developer to meet zoning specifications 30 feet and 15 feet minimum requirements. 4. Lowering of property value. However, their counter proposal would place the full burden of traffic on current Brookwood Drive residents and also creating a potential safety hazard for the 30 families who will occupy the proposed homes. This proposal would limit access of emergency vehicles, for example, to the new sub -division. It is our feeling that possibly a rectangular grid pattern (see attached sketch) would be more suitable in the interest of safety and equitable traffic distribution throughout the development. We hope, after reviewing all the ideas presented at this preliminary hearing, a reasonable compromise can be reached, satisfying all concern parties, 9 f3•� • o i a)oR.ira — �6 y S-S )e a a Y O 0 Cie SK t 7rc H 'boRStT ST sHERRy Rb. O AKWoo 'b Of REC. 1U 0% C. T i t,U N 6, HasT Puiat,kG Hcal,a�v✓oaD Pl 14, 5 To: Members of thk luth Burlington Planning Comni bn From: Residents of Brookwood Drive, Oakwood Drive, Sherry Road, and Woodside Drive. We, the residents of Brookwood, Oakwood, Woodside Drive and Sherry Road,express the following reservations about the proposed Oak -Brook development plan to be reviewed by the South Burlington Planning Commission Tuesday, ,Tune 12, 1979. We are not opposed to residential development of the property in question, but we are concerned that the Planning Commission and the developer review the issues of traffic safety and sewage and drainage before approving the application. A, residents, taxpayers, and voters, we make the following recommendations. 1. Access to Oak -Brook as it affects the safety of our families and the physical condition of our streets constitutes our first objection to the proposed plot plan. Most of us who reside in the existing development purchased our homes b:-cau3e the neighborhood was convenient to shopping and services and safe for young children. We have already experienced the traffic increase caused by the additional development of Oakwood, and we believe that creation of two entrances into Oak-.73rook development poses needless hazards by routing traffic through populated :streets. In addition, wL que:;tion the wisdom of permitting heavy construction equipment to travel existing streets because it is dangerous and would simply erode substandard conditions. Finally, seperate entrances are unnecessarily wasteEul of maintainence energies and will hinder access for emergency vehicles. We propose that the two streets planned for Oak -Brook converge at the, entrance to Brookwood Drive and that each stl:eet terminate in a cul-de-sac near the western boundary of the developer's property. Such a revision would permit maximum development space while minimizing the impact of new traffic on pre-existing h.oxies. We even urge that the Commission consider removing all new traffic from the pr­!s-tnt development by using city right of waya •,cross the Rand property to create a direct access between Oak -Brook and .Dorset Street. 2. Our second objection to the development proposal concerns drainage patterns and sewage. As residents we know present drainage systems are notoriously in- adequate and that further development promises to compound rather than to relieve our problems. For reasons of health we object to the developer's proposal to route all surface drainage to the east end of the development and into the brook that bisects Sherry Road. We recommend a closed drainage system designed to carry surface waters to the west of the development and empty them into the sa::e brook where it flows beneath Interstate 89. Such a system would be more costly, but it would also begin to correct the problem rather than continue to compound i t . With re3pecr to sewage,we read that the Airport Parkway treatment plant is already overloaded, and we do not understand how more housing will correct that problem. We also know that the Woodside Drive system, currently at its capacity of twenty eight houses, has required cleaning to free it of blockages twice within the past six years. Finally, we know that failure to plan and monitor the proposed drainage for the extension of Oakwood Drive resulted in a costly repair for the city this past autumn.. We advise that plans for drainage and sewage for Oak -Brook consider the welfare of pre-existing residences and be carefully sonitored by appropriate city officials. At the outset we stated that we do not categorically oppose the residential development named Oak -Brook. We do, however, urge your review of these and other points we raise to insure that our vested interest in the Glenwood Park neighborhood is protected by careful planning. Thank you. 12 .June 1979. 51l Z LzeS To C �tiPl►�T q,{ eYAOM MEN► HET IWTW, ,&IU6 ��A,,.ao�_ V'�� b�i9 No Text too j7RAltyQbQ EO+ W aZ �U) N ZERO LOT LINE/PUBLIC CUL-DE-SAC 5 DU/AC Net Density 12 units on 2.38 acres = 5.0 DU/AC Gross Density 12 units on 2.51 acres = 4.78 DU/AC Average Lot Size 7,390 S.F. [ 1 Site Development Costs/DU $5039 V, Cul-de-sac Total Street Total R.O.W. Pavement Width R.O.W. Width Turnaround Radius Turnaround R.O.W. Subcollector Street Pavement Width R.O.W. Width Setbacks Front Yard Side Yard Building Coverage Average Garage Total Coverage Driveway Coverage Average Total Coverage 8,200 S.F. 14,924 S.F. 20' 28' 45' 98'x98' (1/2 street and R.O.W.) 26' 3,636 S.F. 40' 5,604 S.F. 683 S.F./DU 1,244 S.F./DU 303 S.F./DU 467 S.F./DU 20' (10' for garages parallel to R.O.W.) 0' and 15' On Subcollector Street 20' 1,500 S.F. 300 S.F. 1,800 S.F. x 12 = 21,600 S.F. 500 S.F. 500 S.F. x 12 = 6,000 S.F. CAKAWOO M52�� (.,I-,?- t- t 4 -& o . awe ,� A , to r4 .� r3 �WA-1 M a kMwwt�P/L oA # rof71 Z9 i 8o1 7/1 12Z 1 7-31 l3 ' Vw �• + ma's fi2- 010 " ` n?01� LL— r -i1got" seN\IA*s G Obacwacp IRI-O� coOcA147r,5, Oiz APDMO��- �.DD Sl L�dVbI.K.� � 1 ��C� p¢q*+✓ PaL1� �vEt.�FE� 4N �A�bl l.dt" - `a��ES D ;,1�f�F'11►� 'i'S : fir.tf�, Z �V�� 1 TO CeQv5leoFiUfZ CmfJl l�Tdt (� `l��4 6 Lom, dPEH %L PeF- '1►/ /Gli'''j'" Paen� -rv' P--W-V- vP Zo"- rrzof-{'i' '. au�WccaD P�uES— LAUPI �-e� wjszt;�. 3o 12.0. x 3.6/{P•c'. q(a— Icc. 13 FFgKz ► coo, g ?( d/, coo _ . 604- e�;,�TZ7 Cam, to.4 a V-k C A3o,eer-> = IZWIAew . 6oq Acxe5 tic Z., b$5 /Ae4M X �?5 Iq 3q Trz P GE"e4&-Clc)P4 Pin — v�� arr ; 1/4 14 .6 - 1 1 MAL- Z IV4:Y `T 4P> / V-v 1 (�, porn, (-;V-- Prn PEAK. VIWP. .VL� L4, t— l 'L 4--4--1 jg-fit. Poi4r 17 Lk I-k It �A i( Ax 457 V� p�"LL�-PasTfC.l�l Oar GcJ�CI-6P1�C�`� � R�E`��TRdGIIOf-�5� '� ��11�t��j -F� la4PklLAAt-tom G v , ���Nl vc � �Yc .tf�I i �T Fv cw_a4 b Vie-4 ✓ — (:) Q= czpCeppr (L.e. -j(oexT Fyn h -4AoA1-C—F= VE OVf� ��. -Pool-5, AiJ T104E � � LS� TK,- T-�,otLu"6:7 sv,<VL-b N T r-ttibbl. Rzr F. C 0 Ilkw/e OiP Lme z 65VT Le� . 3Z-A Cd) .IP56 , L1 r l Lo (� -7-A Q N14 + P� . zq Cad •"7Z (G) SPOKES F6 OBUCHOWSKI ATTO RN EYS AT LAW P. O.BOX 2325 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 RICHAP.D A. SPOKES IOSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI September 25, 1979 Mr. Stephen Page City Planner 1175 Williston Road So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Steve: 1775 WILLISTON ROAD TELEPHONE (802) 863-2857 I have met with Steve Crampton on a couple of occasions to review the proposed "building envelope" scheme in the Spafford Develop- ment. I am enclosing "Proposed Wording For Inclusion In Sub- division Lot Deeds." I find the proposed wording to be legally satisfactory from the City's viewpoint. Very truly yours, Richard A "Spokes RAS:mil Enclosure cc: Stephen R. Crampton, Esq. 71 �,.pj I Nt n —� 3 Z 3 Nv t L,(, CO3 35 `- Wn 4 -74 ---� I 4d{9L 1'7 �� osy Pi 5 5 1(0 ZI 58 IV Zb( y Pin 1 !--f Felz 1719 ,ate �cr� Piro . �-- Z Z <87 `7'7 �7 1 v✓�i-cam I,,-- %N z-z \1 ,��) T (--", 70 1 zq 51 1 -40 (flo Z 3a At t. a 40 y 1") 7 (1 3 50 47 3 5Cv -41 ?, t i 8 AIA M&Vo 4 WA A^ ]P/^ ZCI �— 57 53 C. INTU . )s1161-49 Jk , P"V N 11 Al c oPY or- *4NvTe,�i r- S�uO) 45 � ? T �i r� .♦ � I � �• � ;� .ice ►►"�. - ND E4 _ W Chu SICK C- 0 ugr-- NJbF4"4a--- C.IrQCY- 1•� lit ELL' . Acm Lc�s rAmL� NCB V t.uuEs 5s�p� vp�DiP�I FtT `cb�PTcS crcY =t- (ctxn, e� D,`fiR roes c •� -cPE�aWnEWT -lyv5 Pecatcc- *ALL Public Hearing - Abuttors - Ae placed 5/26/79 ,(---Craig Spaffora - Oakbrook Pines Developme'n-t':-- Ronald F. Gero - 93 Oakwood Drive Gerald Parot- 11 Oakwood Drive Norman Reuss - 9 Woodside Drive Jack Provencher - 7 Woodside Drive Stephen Maglaris - 5 Woodside Drive Joseph Pairie - 1 Woodside Drive John Finnegan - 25 Sherry Road Kevin Sheffield - 19 Sherry Road Wilfred Kirby - 15 Sherry Road Albert Francis - 5 Sherry Road Damien Couture - 12 Brookwood Drive University Mall Realty Trustees - 300 C Street, Boston, MA 02127 �-- Bruce C. Latelle - 84 Oakwood Drive x DO= Morris Wilcox - 152 Lyman Avenue, BXK# Burlington, VT VX James O'Brien - 19 Mi Oakwood Drive �41 =Office s - Peter Judge - 1795 Williston Road Kevin Killelagh, Homeowners Association ix:l�= 'g-e X 4 -IC e -9 C IAPx-I' 1�4- A� vx OAKBROOK PINES DEVELO7NT 1 Contigous Property Owners nr;� Alpert Francis 93 Oa od Dr' S Sherry Rd. o. url. So. Burl. ,F F r x p 93 :9:2- Oakwood Dr. 19 : Sher fy ,Rd . So. Burl. Srrl Gerald Parot Damien Couture //Woodside Dr. l j�- Brookwood Dr. So. Burl. So. Burl. University Mall Realty Trustees Yrei AGj,,e 300 C Street Burl. Boston, Mass. 02127 Norman Reuss C/ 9 Woodside Dr. So. Burl. j? y Jack Provencher 7 Woodside Dr. S o . Burl. Stephen Maglaris 5 Woodside Dr.-- U ' /3,e �✓ S o . Burl. , �' �/•om �s Joseph Paire 1 Woodside Dr. So. Burl. le ti e l p' 2 e y VV . Bur . John Finnegan 25 Sherry Rd. So. Burl. 19 Sherry Rd. Ir So. Burl. �e r� 5 Wilfred Kirby ,_''-Sherry Rd. So. Burl. y� P� �G 00 i/ u. 147 = I v�� ��-.q' s ©�-i yule135. `woyy S 7/,?4-`t= l` s f/v L I> 1-14 -v4r i';eJ 7Z zi�,e c5ze,-5 a�k4'*' qk;A, CIX A L'ItAL to 1,1-ao "g, 11 -2� I Ow #—, Iz- j a L;l , Lp Fv --- 9-6n LF T' 1-2, 10 f 10514/, lw!� Ink na Sows r a tea c .a w 92e�ae4 eamdteactiam RFD #r3 - MILTON, VERMONT 05468 - (802) 893.4624 I Sohn Stuart k t Re: Proposal for Brookwood, South B $off DESCRIPTION 3080 yds. gravel s �4* h }H 2 360 yds. plant mix 3 750 Pavement G 4 3r470 L.F. Curbing "..,,Water* Stem , se ..,5 720 L.F. pipe 61 2 Tapping valves ? 4 Hydrants 4: Valve assemblies for hydrants .' .. 9 31 Services r Storm Sewer, & Catch basins k R 11 55 L.F.(: 59t) RCP 12 3,35 L.F. (18"') RCP' �*, 60 L.F. (4211) RCP 4 ' 1,Li 8 Frames .and grates, � t rl� 1i Yl 1 4„ January 6, 1980 UNIT PRICE 5.70 yd.. 6.30 yd. 29.50 5.201 18.30 t 2,200.00 ea. 4050,00 ea. 340.00 ea. 325.00 ea. 940.00 ea. COST 213,546000 ' 2, 268.00 22,125.00 18,,044.00 i3,776.00 4s,400000 4,200.00 r.°nt 1,36o.00 10p075.00 F l I t I. 7,520.00 k' 17.001 935.00 , 19o001 6i365.00 60.00 + 3x600.00 k 4 125.00 ea. 4000.00 L LZ p' , P a FACE Veymo dd eomarucaom k RFD'#3 • MILTON, VERMONT 05468 • (802) 893-4624 ; r ;Sanitary Sewer ITEM DESCRIPTION LP UNIT PRICE COST 4140 L.F. (8u) PVC 1.2.70t 1.4,478.00 , w 16 1261 yds. z'r stone bedding 7.50 yd. 945.00 "^ ' ],7 7..�anholes 880.00 ea. 6,i6o.00 r $ 7 Cast Iron frame and covers 210.00 ea. 1 4;70.00 a Iig 31 Sewer services 450.00 ea. 13095040 A 20 31.Sewer Yts 30.00 ea. 930.00 Sidewalks ........---.......... 21,.. 11460 L.F. sidewalk 6.251 9s'125000` 22 270 yds« gravel' in place under walk 6.30 yd. 1,701.00-. WIM& Vol* 2 Clearing and grubbing 2.3 Acres: LS 5.v750.00 fi 24 Cut and Fill LS 31.000.00 25 Underground utilities (1,620L.F.) 2,40t 3,888.Q0 r 26 356 cu.yd 6 topsoil- and seeding LS 3..560.OQ 27 Site Engineering LS 3,>000.00 c d 2$ Erosion Control (HW and stone) LS 500.00 La{ } �9 Clean up NIG - 30 De watering for pipe line and structures; x extra stone and pumping LS 3x500.00 `'" Acepfoaedd eomaeuctiom RFD #3 - MILTON, VERMONT 05468 - (802) 893-4624 f Reynolds Construc 'on 0A� e q� L-OT z t - c oHt-'r stave. AcCG% 0-T T 1+"E s set L' -M E: �t,t, A � t.�` �• e. APAT t UT DWMZ�-> 7i--1e� ALk, 30 oT cam', /r 1 L R JPS 122. 59 , BROOKWOOD, LTD. S0. BURLINGTON, VT. S/C�' 6 /go City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET �* SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 '"•• �•• •�`'� ��-C TEL. 863-2891 December 6, 1982 Craig Spafford Associates 186 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Brookwood Development Off Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont Dear Craig: OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER WILLIAM 1. SZYMANSO The street and utility construction for the above referenced project is complete and acceptable to the City except for the following: 1. There are some sidewalks that were broken during house construction that have not been replaced. 2. A section of guard rail along the sidewalk at the large culvert has not been installed. Upon completion of this work we will release the funds held in escrow for this project. Very tru/y urs, RECEIVED JAN - 5 i993 Willia J, ;ztym a n s k 4 i City Manager MANAGER'S OFFICE j CITY SO. BURLINGTON ��=}'► ice, � pi �L WJS/b J Amu ✓ �, wm�1. / U °V I''. 1 ¢`/'� !•�±"Di '�-T'l 'J �N+" 0 is ' f / ti w.w..n -�. _ �'+�••.� ; r�' .-''--- .� i