Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0345 Dorset StreetN A M E- A ti cx' T- C Alb tQ Y 1: V./ p P60POSED .517-E PLAAl 1/1= 14)eoll -&V Vic -rev ncli 1, -1> C—k L )K31 DE 1 X po$.'TiF"D l$u4:*-,r r_ NT A' O 1 f� ._... � � � \ ,� •/J}�\�\``��[ �\ _ _ _'_.-%� `.� . Yam. i _ �/ � /'��"f/`�/ 6 F�K7fLi Z,t"•E1 , 9 i SSP f. J 12/27/77 SUGGESTED MOTION OF APPROVAL Deslauriers Subdivision 1" move that the South Burlington Planning Ccm-Assion approve the subdivision application of Dir. Roland DesLauriers, for a 2 lot subdivision located directly north of the Girl Scout property on the west side or Dorset Street, as depicted on a plan entitled "Plat of land of Roland and Evangeline DesLauriers..." by Trudell Consulting aiginee.rs, dated 1/l`)/77, subject to the following stipulations: 1. This approval is valid for lot 1 only. 2. The balance of the property (lots 2,3 and 4) is subject to final plat review. 3. The approval of any development on lot 1 is predicated on adequate sewage capacity becoming available, as determined by the City Engineer, 4. The curb rut for lot #1 shall be shared in cormion with lot #2 and secured by an appropriate easement tO be approved by the City Attorney. This curb cut shall be located as depicted on the proposed site plan accompanying this application. 5. A sidewalk, to city standards, shall be constructed across the frontage of lot 1. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT OR SUBDIVISION PERMIT 1. Applicant's Name, Address, and Phone Number Roland & Evangeline DesLauriers , Bolton Valley, Bolton, Vt. 434-2131 2. Name, Address, and Phone Number of the Person Whom the Commission should contact regarding this Application Ralph R. DesLauriers Bolton Valley Lodge, Bolton, Vt. 05477 434-2131 3• Nature of the Development or Subdivision Divide an existing R-4 lot into 4 parcels. 4. Location of Development or Subdivision Dorset Street, North of Girl Scout Office 5. High and Low Elevations of the Tract of Land involved with the Development or Subdivision As Dorset Street variance less than 6' 6. Address of each of the Applicant's Offices in Vermont Bolton Valley, Bolton, Vt. 05477 7. Applicant's Legal Interest in the Property (Fee Simple, Option, Etc.) Fee simple IMM 8. If the Applicant is not an individual, the Form, Date, and Place of Formation of the Applicant FORM: Individual DATE: PLACE: 9. Estimated Cost, Exclusive of Land Cost of the Development (Applicant for a Subdivision Need Not hswer) 10. Application for a Subdivision, the Number of Lots 4 11. What Restrictive Covenants are Planned for any Deed(s) to be issued? None 12. Description of the Proposed Development of Subdivision A. Plans and Specifications: (1) Attach a detailed plat or plot plan of the proposed project drawn to scale, showing the location and dimensions of the entire tract. This plan should also show: all lots, streets, roads, water lines, sewage systems, drain systems, buildings, existing or intended. (2) In subdivisions where individual water and sewage facilities are intended, indicate the proposed location(s). (3) Show all easements, parks, playgrounds, parking areas, water courses, and other bodies of water, natural or artificial, existing or intended. (4) Include a contour ma of the land involved drawn on a scale of 5 foot contour intervals. (5) Indicate on the plans the location and width of any easements for utilities, roads, etc., exist- ing or intended. Attach a written explanation of any such easements. I ki -3- 13. What is the purpose of this Subdivision or Development and What is the intended use of the land after Subdivision or Development? To subdivide into 4 intc to be used for office space and/or residential 14. Describe the Site of the Proposed Development or Subdivis- ion including information, if available, on Soils, Streams or Other bodies of Water, Bedrocks, Etc. Flat,wooded piece of land with 674' of frontage on Dorset Street 15. Acreage: A. Number of acres owned or in which you have a legal interest in South Burlington, approximately 30 acrPc B. Number of acres in this project 2.38 acres C. Number of acres previously developed none in last 10 Years D. When do you anticipate beginning the project Jan. 1978 E. When will this development or subdivision be completed 1978 16. Water System: A. What type of water system is to be provided, such as: Individual system on each lot, community system, municipal system, etc. municipal B. Where is the nearest municipal water system and is it available and feasible to use it? on Dorset St. adjacent to property 17. Sewage System: A. What type of sewage disposal system is to be provided or intended, such as: Individual system on each lot, community system, or municipal system? munic.inal N - 4 - B. Where is the nearest community sewage system and is it available and feasible to use it? on Dorset St. adjacent to property C. If the sewage system is other than a community, municipal, or individual lot septic tank and leaching field, include competent professional engineering evidence that it will perform satisfactorily. 18. Adjacent Property: A. List below the names and addresses of adjacent property owners. Dorset St.---Vt. Girl Scout Council; G.&K. Barrett Sherry Road----- D. Bevins; B. Gilman; S. Fuller; E. & B. Aiken C. Leonard; A. & L. Previti; L. & N. Palmer; M. & D. Graves; C. & J. Schmitz B. What is the adjacent property used for at present? commercial and residential C. What is the future usage intended for the adjacent property? commercial and residential 19. Zoning: A. Which District or Districts is the proposed site with- in according to the official zoning map of the City? DATE f2- / /-) i SIGNATURE Y �/ i I F PLANNING COr:ISSION 3. DE CEMB ER 27. 1977 .said that he recommended that A:r. DesLauriers go on a waiting list with one lot conditional on capacity becoming available. Xr. Peter Collins said that he had been in touch with City Hall concerning sewage capacity with regard to other projects and that he had been told that there was no capacity. Mr. Poger moved to conclude the public hearinZ and the motion was seconded by Mr. Morency. The motion passed unanimously. I-ir. Vessel said that the Commission could approve one lot, no lots, or all lots. Mr. Poger said that if there was no capacity, he could not hook up to the sewer. -Mr. Wessel felt that it would be dangerous to give a blanket approval since the Commission could not allocate something it did not have. Mr. KToolery .moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the subdivision application of ifir•. Poland ­DesLauriers for a 2 lot subdivz-sion --- located directly north of the Girl Scout property on the west side of Dorset Street, as depicted on'a plan entitled "Plat of land of Roland and Etirargeline DesLauriers..." by Trudell Consulting engineers, dated 9 16 77, subject to the following stipulations: 1) This approval is valid for lot 1 only. 2) The balance'of the property (lots 2,3 and 4) is subject to final plat review. 3) The approval of any development on lot 1 is predicated on adequate sewage capacity becoming available, as determined by the City Engineer. 4) The curb cut for lot1 shall be shared in common with lot r-;2 and secured by an appropriate easement to be approved by the City Attorney. This curb cut shall be located as depicted on the proposed site plan accompanying this application. 5) A sidewalk, to city standards, shall be constructed across the fronta of lot 1. The motion was seconded by Mr. Morency. The Commission discussed the motion briefly and then it was passed unanimously. ?ublic Hearing: Final slat applic=tion of San Remo Realty for a 2 lot subdivision at 150 Kennedy Drive James Pizzagalli said that he was happy to say that this project needed no sewer hookup. It is located at the intersection of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road across from the Georgetown Apartments. ie said that the land had been subdivided originally in 1360 but that the plan had not been recorded and the eperoval lapsed. At that time it was .made 3 lots and called Kennedy Plaza. S_ye of the original boundry 1:-es have been cha-aged sliChtly on the new plan. maid that they were asking for at-.roval of the lot lines and of the entire reject. Lot 2, he said, they had :,o�i_'mediate plans for developing, and it �au.d b1.e hard to do because of the physical characteristics of the land. I:r. ..orency as'r.ed about access and ?•:r. = i zzagzlli said that there were two unused C"-:-- cuts cn the �_..� ^ox. _;ei t er ld _ } I_ CG: . c e3, Gw% G", sec -_:se of a fence i.. , a ditch. :r. : oger 5;:,-1-`ested t:._t t--cy le c_csed _nd .:r. . yzzat =lli t: &t t:_e; were, iTi effect. _',e =iG t:,�y were thinking Of re`^Erby.n a r aht of way fQr lot 2 thrcu.;h lot 3 zir.ce t=_at would Le the best wayto het in. the land in. that a:•ea is zuned 1.7. ::r. i Eessel asked how zuc`i. of lot c ::as developable land aLd was told t :t :t would be hark to sa'r *lt.:_ut a more Lccarate s t::^.y . a.` a Said t..,t two C'.rc�..-c*e:'�,'S .:e!:t thr_ .�.' t:,e _ ^C: er:;> PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 22, 1977 Mr. Palmer said that he had talked to the State Highway Department about entrance and exit from the property and that no left turns.into the lot will be allowed. People will have to go past the entrance and then turn around so that they can enter by making'a right turn. Mr. Morency asked about putting a barrier in the road to prevent left turns, but Mr. Palmer said that the Highway Department had not liked that idea. Iir. Woolery asked whether the car -leasing business, which will go on one of the lots, would be generating traffic at Specific times of the day and was told that cars would be taken and returned any time, although not by the customers themselves. Mr. Morency slid that it did not seem practical or good design to have cars have to pass the lot then turn around and come back to - get in. Mr. Poger also felt uncomfortable with.that idea. He was not at all sure that people would obey the "no left turn" signs, or that they would even see them. Xr. Page said that Mr. Palmer had had to depend on the Highway Department for help in this and he said that part of the approval would be that the property be developed in phases and that the Commission could review the situation before the last two lots were developed. i;r. Poger replied that if 3 lots were developed and the Commission decided the situation was dangerous, they could do nothing about it at that time and it would remain unsafe. Mr. Page said that the plan was to extend the new industrial road to the east and that that would make it roughly parallel with this section of road. Trucks could then go down that way. Mr. Foger still did not like the design and Mr. M-orency felt that it looked temporary, not pe=anent. Mr. Page said that land for widening the road would be reserved. Mr. Morency suggested moving the center line over and having two lanes going down the hill and one up instead of the other way around. He said that the present set-up would not prevent left turns and he would rather have a provision for them there. He said that that was much more reasonable. Mr. Poger said that the Commission should_request the Highway Department to re -design the entry, moving the center line over as suggested by Mr. :Morency. He asked Mr. Palmer if a delay for that reason would cause him any hardship and was told that it would not. Mr. Poger moved to continue the public hearing on Muddy Brook Industrial Park td December 6, 1977 at 7:30 pm at City Hall. The motion was seconded by Mr. Morency and passed unanimously. Sketch Plan Review: Subdivision of DesLauriers property, Dorset Street and Sherry Road Mr. DesLauriers said that he had been in before the Commission to talk about this and that they had liked the idea. There will be 4 small office buildings with 2 curb cuts along Dorset Street. They will be 2 stories tall and contain about 3,000 sq.ft. each. ?ie sbid that he had obtained Zoning Board approval to build the first building and use it fora Peal Estate business. The entire lot has both sewer and water lines,he.said, and he felt that the sewage flow would be very low. This use of the land would also give the city more money in tar_ revenues and would not put any children into the school system, as it would if the land were used in a residential way. The lot facing Sherry Road would be a residential lot, though, since an office building would not be approyriate there, he felt. ne said that he would wait until the sewage problem was resolved to put the house on that lot. Mr. Poger said that the final determination on seer capacity would be made by the City Engineer, not the Planning Commission. e. Site Plan Review: Veineke Discount Muffler Shop, lot -6, Green Mountain Drive_ Z IMr. Richard Feeley represented Meineke I,uffler. Fe said that they had been given a conditional use permit for the business b}- the Zoning Bcard 2 weeks ago. 3. PLANNING COMI�KISSION NOVEMBER 22, 1977 Mr. Palmer said that he had talked to the State Highway Department about entrance and exit from the property and that no left turns Anto the lot will be allowed. People will have to go past the entrance and then turn around so that they can enter by making'a right turn. Mr. Morency asked about putting a barrier in the road to prevent left turns, but Mr. Palmer said that the Highway Department had not liked that idea. Mir. 'Foolery asked whether the car -leasing business, which will go on one of the lots, would be generating traffic at specific times of the day and was told that cars would be taken and returned any time, although not by the customers therseives. Ks. Morency slid that it did not seem practical or good design to have cars have to pass the.lot then turn around and come back to - get in. ;sir. Poger also felt uncomfortable with that idea. He was not at all sure that people would obey the "no left turn" signs, or that they would even see them. I;r. Page said that Mr. Palmer had had to depend on the Highway Department for help in this and he said that part of the approval would be that the property be developed in phases and that the Commission could review the situation before the last two lots were developed. Mr. Poger replied that if 3 lots were developed and the Commission decided the situation was dangerous, they could do nothing about it at that time and it would remain unsafe. Mr. Page said that the plan was to extend the new industrial road to the east and that that would make it roughly parallel with this section of road. Trucks could then go down that way. Mr. Foger still did not like the design and Mr. I'orency felt that it looked temporary, not per anent. Mr. Page said that land for widening the road would be reserved. Mr. Morency suggested moving the center line over and having two lanes going down the hill and one up instead of the other way around. He said that the present set-up would not prevent left turns and he would rather have a provision for them there. He said that that was much more reasonable. Mr. Poger said that the Commission should -request the Highway Department to re -design the entry, moving the center line over as suggested by Mr. Morency. He asked Mr. Palmer if a delay for that reason would cause him any hardship and was told that it would not. Mr. Poger moved to continue the public hearing on 'buddy Brook Industrial Park to' December 6, 1977 at 7:30 pm at City Hall._ the motion was seconded by Mr. Morency and passed unanimously. ,j. Sketch Plan Review: Subdivision of DesLauriers property. Dorset Street and Sherry Road ' Mr. DesLauriers said that he had been in before the Commission to talk about this and that they had liked the idea. There will be 4 small office buildings with 2 curb cuts along Dorset Street. They will be 2 stories tall and contain about 3,000 sq.ft. each. He said that he had obtained Zoning Board approval to build the first building p^_3 use it fora Real Estate business. The entire lot has both sewer and water lines,he.said, and he felt that the sewage flow would be very low. This use of the land would also give the city more money in tax revenues and would not put any children into the school system, as it would if the land were used in a residential way. The lot facing Sherry Road would be a residential lot, though, since an office building would not be approrriate there, he felt. He said that he would wait until the sewage problem was resolved to put the house on that lot. Mr. Poger said that the final determination on sewer capacity would be Wade by the City Engineer, not the Planning Commission. Site Plan Feview• Yeineke Discount ;'U ffler Shop, lot :6, Green Xountain Drive Mr. Richard Feeley represented Meineke Muffler. Fe said that they had been given a conditional use permit for the business by the Zoniz,g Bcard 2 weeks ago. m M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Stephen Page, Planning Assistant Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items Date: November 18, 1977 1) C.R. Wood Addition The proposed addition, 1100 square feet in size, will fit in the "ell" of an existing structure. Parking, circulation, and access are adequate. The amount of landscaping conforms to ord- inance requirements; however, I recommend that the landscaping be relocated to the front of the property, closer to Williston Road, if possible. 2) Final Plat, Muddy Brook Industrial Park The application is complete; I suggest two further chances: first, to show the layout of the approach to Williston Road (as required by the Highway Department) and secondly, pedestrian trail easements be added. Both of these changes could be made conditions of approval. 3) Chastenay, 1 lot Subdivision Contour information shows there is adequate buildable area for a duplex on the proposed lot. A restriction to minimize or prevent erosion would be in order. A survey must be recorded be- fore a building permit is issued. A pedestrian easement, contiguous with the existing sewer easement on this property, should be con- sidered. The City Engineer must approve the hook-up to municipal sewer. 4) Sketch Plan Review, DesLauriers Property Lot layout and access plans appear to be excellent. Soils on the proposed residential appear to be quite wet. A small drainageway will need to be culverted for about 60 feet. Finally, because of the sewer capacity shortage, no more than 1 or possibly 2 lots should be granted final subdivision approval at this time. A use variance for a small (3,000 square feet) office building at the southern edge of the property has been granted by the Zoning Board of Adjustment. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, December 1,3, 1977, at 7:30 p.m., to consider the %gc final plat app ications of: 1) Smart Associates, Inc., to subdivide a parcel. of 105 acres into 4 lots of 13,14,13, and 15 acres each plus a remaining parcel of 49 acres. The subdivision is bounded on the east by lands of Tlilliam E. Mikell and the Town of Williston, on the south by Van Sicklen Road,-and'lands of Douglas J. Kendall, Robert J. Watson, Richard H. Taft, Daniel D. Hendley, Genevieve Martel, and the west by lands of William B. Wessel, Daniel E. Wright, Henry G. Young, Bernard R. Hammond, Donald F. Kerwin, Charles H. Dunn and Steven A. Reiman, and on the north by lands of Homer L. Dubois. 2) Roland and Evangeline DesLauriers, to subdivide a parcel of 2.3 acres into 4 lots,.3, .5, .5,-and 1 acre each. The subdivision is bounded on the east by Dorset Street, on the west by lands of D. Beirns, B. Gilman, S. Fuller, E.& B. Aiken, C. Leonard, A. & L. Previti, L & N. Palmer, 11. & D. Graves, and Sherry Road, on the north by lands of C. & J. Schmitz, and G.& K. Barrett, and on the south by lands of the Vermont Girl Scat Council, In.c. Copies of the i cations are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William B. Wessel, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission Nove-nber 26, 1977 November 22, 1977 ESTIMATED SEWAGE FLOW AND TAX REVENUE DORSET STREET SUBDIVISION FOR ROLAND AND EVANGELINE DESLAURIERS ESTIMATED SEWAGE FLOW 3000 square feet office building Accepted federal and state standards estimate 15 gallons per day per employee, If each building employs 6 people x 15 gallons = 90 gallons per day. If each building employs 12 people x 15 gallons = 180 gallons per day. Probable average use per building = 135 gallons per day. 4 proposed buildings x 135 gallons per day = 540 gallons per day for 4 office buildings. PROBABLE TAX REVENUE Per building. If land and building value is $70,000 50% of 70,000 = $35,000 x $6.86 = $2400 per building. SUMMARY Estimated load on sewage system 540 gallons per day Estimated tax revenue $9,600 Estimated children in school system 0 r OLTON ALLEY R E S O R T BOLTON V A L L E Y, VERMONT 0 5 4 7 7 TELEPHONE ( 8 0 2) 4 3 4 - 2 1 3 1 January 2, 1977 Stephen Page Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Rd. South Burlington, Vt. 05401 Dear Mr. Page: Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $33, subdivision fee for the 2 lot subdivision approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission at its December 27, 1977 meeting. Sincerely, ) Ralph R. DesLauriers President RRD/sk y 7 �, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: DesLauriers Development, Dorset Street Date: December 27, 1977 1. Projects approved to date will exceed the projected allowable flow to the Airport Parkway Sewage Treatment Plant. This project should be placed on line for any reserve capacity that may come. 2. Dorset Street drains into this parcel and then northerly to the brook across parcel #4. A drainage collection system must be planned. 3. Sidewalks along Dorset Street should be considered. Respectfully submitted, William J. Szymanski City Manager WJS/h CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: DesLauriers Development, Dorset Street Date: December 27, 1977 1. Projects approved to date will exceed the projected allowable flow to the Airport Parkway Sewage Treatment Plant. This project should be placed on line for any reserve capacity that may come. 2. Dorset Street drains into this parcel and then northerly to the brook across parcel #4. A drainage collection system must be planned. 3. Sidewalks along Dorset Street should be considered. WJS/h I Respectfully submitted, William J. Szymanski City Manager MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Stephen Page, Planning Assistant Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items Date: December 23, 1977 1) Sewers - Memo forthcoming 2) DesLauriers Subdivision - Sewage capacity is the only iss»e remaining. Bill Szymanski says that our current flow'-'io �Iicjhtly=- over design capacity; hog.ever, he would agree to an approval cond- itional on sewage capacity becoming available. Since Mr. DesLaurier was led to believe there was capacity for 1 lot (see memos/minutes ofE sketch plan review) I recommend a conditional approval. However, I do not feel any subsequent applications should receive similarly conditioned aprrovals because all subdivision applicants subsequent to Mr. DesLzuriers have been told quite explicity that there is no sewage capacity. SAN REMO REALTY SUBDIVISION 3) I have conferred with Dick Spokes about the problem of setting off lot 1 (with the building on it), which leaves lot 2 (difficult, perhaps impossible to develop) as a vacant, approved lot. To resole this, Dick suggests the Commission make a finding that lot 2 is undevelopable under current zoning and -subject to full subdivision review before any permits may be issued. This finding could be backed up by an appropriate notation on the plat to be recorded plus a suitable legal agreement to be approved by Spokes and then recorded as well. The existing curb cuts on lot 2 should be closed. The joint use of the curb cut for 150 Kennedy Drive (lots 1 & 2) should be secured by an easement or appropriate legal agreement that is re- 4) Lozon Property Subdivision - Sketch Plan Site - The site is forested with a mixture of second growth hard and soft woods, is flat to gently sloping, and appears to have some :aet areas. It is bounded on the north and west by commercially developed properties. To the east is vacant land, zoned R-4. To the south is the Velco Transmission line, the Shelburne town line, and vacant resiaehtially i .-oned property. .E M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Final Plat Application, Smart Associates, Inc. Date: December 91 1977 School administration should approve proposed bus school turn- around located on Van Sicklen Road. Easements to pedestrian trail should be conveyed prior to the issuance of permits. Addition percolation tests are necessary when a house site is established on lot #75. A set back greater than 100 feet from the centerline of Muddy Brook should be considered when locating the house site for lot '5. Bond requirements to be completed prior to any request for permits. - Re: Final Plat Application, Deslauriers Lots 3 and 4 contain as drainage way which is classified a minor stream, set back being 50 feet, lot 3 as shown on plan prepared October 4, 1977 indicates a culvert, use within the C.O. District is prohibited. Two structures on lot -T3 and the set back of all buildings will require an appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Selective tree removal will allow for a credit applied to landscaping requirements at site plan review. Re: SkFtch Plan Review, San Remo Rea Applicant was granted sub -division approval in 1970. This application involves relocating property lines in order to sell parcel 3 and add land to parcel 1. Lots are in conformance, however, existing uses are non -conforming. Parcel 2 contains drainage ways which are considered a minor streams, remaining land is zoned Residential 7 District. Parcel 1 and 2 will use existing curb cut, two curb cuts (not in use) ( should be closed. t oza�- S&41 . ra a4 - M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Stephen Page, Planning Assistant Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items Date: December 23, 1977 1) Sewers - Memo forthcoming 2) DesLauriers Subdivision - Sewage capacity is the only iss?le remaining. Bill Szymanski says that our current, flow" i:3 Nightly over design capacity; hoi-:ever, he would agree to an approval cone- itional on sewage capacity becoming available. Since Mr. DesLaurier was led to believe there was capacity for 1 lot (see memos/minutes o= sketch plan review) I recommend a conditional approval. However, I do not feel any subsequent applications should receive similarly conditioned approvals because all subdivision applicants subsequent to Mr. DesLauriers have been told quite explicity that there is no seT.11age capacity. SAN RalO REALTY SUBDIVISION 3) I have conferred with Dick Spokes about the problem of setting off lot 1 (with the building on it), which leaves lot 2 (difficult, perhaps impossible to develop) as a vacant, approved lot. To resolve this, Dick suggests the Commission make a finding that lot 2 is undevelopable under current zoning and.subject to full subdivision review before any permits may be issued. This finding could be backed up by an appropriate notation on the plat to be recorded plus a suitable legal agreement to be approved by Spokes and then recorded as well. The existing curb cuts on lot 2 should be closed. The joint use of the curb cut for 150 Kennedv Drive (lots 1 & 2) should be secured by an easement or appropriate legal agreement that is re- 4) Lozon Property Subdivision - Sketch Plan Site - The site is forested with a mixture of second growth hard and soft woods, is flat to gently sloping, and appears to have some wet areas. It is bounded on the north and west by commercially developed properties. To the east is vacant land, zoned R-4. To the south is the Velco Trznsmission line, the Shelburne tom line, and vacant residentially i •oned property. f Memorandum - Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items - December 23, 1977 Page 2 Access - The primary entrance point lies 650' east of the inter- section of Rte. 7 and Allen Road. Sight distance is good. As for the secondary entrance, sight distance appears to be close - This entrance ;aay be an unnecessary expense. The possibilities for emergency access should be examined for the 20' strip to the west, the residential land to the south, and along an extension of the right of way to the east. There is also a potential for a service road vhicb could be shared with the Shelburne Road. {Properties to the west and serve as the primary entrance to the project as well: {light of way width in the project must be 80' unless VU S re- commends otherwise. An access which affords smooth traffic flow should be required, which may entail accel/decell. lanes or other improvements to Allen Road. Landscaping 13uffers - Saving existing vegetation or installing new plantings should be required to 'Duffer adjoining residential properties. Landscaping plans can be reviewed on a lot by lot basis, under site plan review. Any significent existing vegetation should be saved, if at all practical, as the layout of lots and roadway is firmed up. Miscellaneous - The buildable area on most of the lots is rather restricted by the VELCO and Champlain V%ater District easements. Further information on site acnstraints (i.e., topography, drainage) will help in finalizing a workable lot layout. with the following exception, there are no specific recommendations in the Comprehensive Plan which apply to this particular property: A barrier median with adjacent frontage roads is recommended for Route 7, and Allen Road is to be extended easterly (not in the ii:mediate future) . 1jarba Shepard c,A,�Sociates Tele. 802-862-3732 Two Pine Meadow Drive, RED 42, Winooski, 'Vermont 05404 April 17, 1978 Richard A. Spokes, Attorney 86 St. Paul Street Burlington, Vermont Re: Common entrance & exit agreement for Dorset Street Lot So. Burlinaton,Vt. Dear Dick, Enclosed is a copy of the agreement that has been nailed to Roland J. &Evangeline S. Deslaurier in Hulls Cove, Maine. The city of So. Burlington requested that we have a legal agreement as to the one curb cut for my lot and the adjoining Deslaurier lands, untill further sub -division is granted. My purpose for sending you a copy is for pre -approval of the agreement, since you are the City attorney. Sincerely, Barbara A. Shepard, Realtor Barbara Shepard Associates, Inc. cs/bs cc. Dick Ward G1VILS x" F); AGREEMENT, dated this day of April, 1978, by and between Roland J. Deslaurier and Evangeline S. Deslaurier, „r husband and wife of Hill's Cove, Maine (jointly the "Deslauriers") and Neil F. Shepard and Barbara A. Shepard, husband and wife, of Colchester, Vermont (jointly the "Shepards"). WHEREAS, the Deslauriers and the Shepards are owners of lands and premises in South Burlington, Vermont adjacent to each other on Dorset Street; and WHEREAS, the lands and premises owned by the Deslauriers are lands and premises conveyed to them pursuant to a warranty deed, dated September 31, 1952 of Fred C. Fiske, recorded in Volume 30, Page 411 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington (the "Deslaurier Lands"); and WHEREAS, the lands and premises owned by the Shepards are all and the same lands and premises conveyed to them pursuant to a warranty deed, dated March 1978, of the Deslauriers, recorded in Volume , Page of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington; and WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington desires that only one curb cut be placed on Dorset Street to benefit . such properties; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to burden and benefit their lands with and by certain easements and restrictions; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that in the event that both parcels are developed, both the Shepard Lands and the Deslaurier Lands shall be benefited by one entrance LISMAN ! LISMAN from Dorset Street, to be located on the northerly portion ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1/ CoLu,. YTRKWT of the Shepard Lands and the southerly portion of the bullu"OT09d, YT. OSAOI Deslaurier Lands. In the event that it is developed, the Deslaurier Lands shall be benefited by a right to use, for pedestrian and vehicle traffic, a right of way, at least 16 feet in width ' from the Shepard Lands entry on Dorset Street to the Deslaurier Lands. In the event that the Deslaurier Lands are developed, the Shepard Lands shall be benefited by a right to use, for pedestrian and vehicle traffic, a right of way at least 16 feet in width, from the Deslaurier Lands entry on Dorset Street to the Shepard Lands. The parties further agree that the use, maintaining, repairing and replacing the rights of way located on the Shepard Lands and the Deslaurier Lands shall be borne equally by the Shepards and by the Deslauriers, and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. This agreement shall be an agreement running with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above. WITNESSES: STATE OF VERMONT Roland J. Deslaurier Evangeline S. Deslaurier Neil F. Shepard Barbara A. Sheparit CHITTENDEN COUNZY, SS. r ' �`r�F+ '.. USMAN 3 LISMAN F Tfi ATTORNEYS AT LAW At Burlington this day of April, 1978 g Y P personally "'`o"`atT.*aw appeared Roland J. Deslaurier and Evangeline S. Deslaurier and "'""""'"' �'' °°'°' each acknowledged this instrument by them signed and sealed to be their free act and deed.