Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-08-87 - Decision - 0435 Dorset Street#S P-08-87 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING TJ BOYLE ASSOCIATES/VEVE - 435 DORSET STREET SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-08-87 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION TJ Boyle Associates LLC, hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to amend a site plan for a 104 unit multi -building residential complex. The amendment is for after - the -fact approval to revise the landscaping plan by removing trees, 435 Dorset Street. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on Tuesday, October 7, 2008. Terry Boyle represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is seeking to amend a site plan for a 104 unit multi -building residential complex. The amendment is for after -the -fact approval to revise the landscaping plan by removing trees, 435 Dorset Street. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Veve Associates Limited, LLP. 3. The subject property is located in the Residential 7 (R7) Zoning District. 4. The plan submitted is entitled, "Dorset Commons Apartments Tree Plan Survey and Mitigation Plan", prepared by T.J. Boyle Associates, LLC, dated 8/5/08. 5. The site was previously placed in violation based on cutting of trees on the property without site plan approval from the Development Review Board. The property owner appealed the decision of the Administrative Officer to issue Notice of Violation #NV-07-18 and the Development Review Board held a public hearing on Tuesday, February 19, 2008. The Board voted to uphold the decision of the Administrative Officer and this application is to remedy a portion of the violation. 6. The applicant has submitted an existing tree inventory as as -built documentation, as well as a landscape screening mitigation plan between the subject property and the neighboring property, known as Town Square Association, where the trees had been removed. The proposed planting plan includes 1 Autumn Blaze Maple (tree), 3 Autumn Magic Black Chokeberry (shrubs) and 21 Arborvitae (shrubs). 7. No other changes to the property are proposed. - 1 - #S P-08-87 DECISION Motion by Qu ry1 seconded by &�/ F LC to approve Site Pan Application SP-08-87 of TJ Boyle & Associates, subj ct to the following conditions: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3) Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall post a $3235 landscaping bond. This bond shall remain in full effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of survival. 4) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 17.04 of the Land Development Regulations or this approval is null and void. 5) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer once the landscaping has been planted. 6) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board or the Administrative Officer. Mark Behr - ye�?nay/abstain/not present Matthew Birmingham �yeaaay/abstain/not present John Dinklaget/nay/abstain/not /nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley —nay/abstain/not present Eric Knudsen — present Peter Plumeau — ea/,la (abstain/not present Gayle Quimby —N�nay/abstain/not present Motion carried by a vote of l - a - 62 Signed this day of 2008, by r, John Dinklage, Chair -2- #SP-08-87 Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRECP 5 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). -3-