The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0372 Dorset StreetMay 17, 2018 Re: #DR-18-06 — 372 Dorset St Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Marla Keene Development Review Planner Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7018 0040 0000 1165 3079 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com south n� i1 PLANNING & ZONING March 22, 2018 Re: #DR-18-01 — 372 Dorset Street Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please contact me. S/yvion , R. Bela r Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7016 1370 0000 1412 0346 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com southhurl neton PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number DR- I S - O 1 (office use only) APPLICATION FOR MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT / SIGN DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. Application for: Initial Master Signage Permit after June 3, 2002 ©Amendment of Master Signage Permit ❑Individual Sign, pursuant to Master Signage Permit #DR 1) OWNER(S) O/f RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) SAf-et- , ine( Iirc Aecs Xnuefi iel Yr+ Ci-c't^iun.LLP. "1 S -Soc.A LJ,, gon5*- 4w-. c' w=a 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page 4)_�3 �� 1 �`fS, Pike . 3) APPLICANT {Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) A i' }c4e11 5-- fico r I f .3-75 Ghcsei* r3lrelEl_ 5 �c1,'r,ez{on. Vr 05yG3. C%r)-P;C 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) LZ<-' ('d Pc-40,4-1 s.he-J,1( fir e DO,(5e4- 51;, 5a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS i�(`3cll�c of °e+,) f-ele,h:a1ma Wcv i y �r'"t�l•C• Irikts- 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3-1 -2, NC5e.f- 5 }ree i V-( 051-1 a3 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 351-0- 60 _3a C S75 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT OS403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General pro int inn (own la in what vnu want nnnrnvaI furl, 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information _required by the City's Sign Ordinance. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge.A Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION:y14 J;w 18 I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find:it to be: Complete Incomplete The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Master Signage Permit Form Rev. 12-2011 Q 4, Yc " f 3 h. OF AOO r} ,. •� � i � Cie yiI 7 � � � t" .d "S � � s 1� r S < i i • ..� eAW i » 4 AW1 it AV 1 F r,. . s .L40 =AD AV t' Arr JKK ., V AMW &�ff s 4r TAmw W aMedical a :. ` . 4 _ Shn G re Shop_ `�, A . 660-8808 a_ + r : 7� ...t.. •;, _ s wK 15 y .. - T� �'�,'. P<i i b .x � � t � r I�at y.. � �-yye•t�' ( - _ , • CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this d Ixa day of/;-6cr a.r-, 20 18, a copy of the foregoing public notice forAAyfer s)k e � ,4,I [type of applicati ] # Dk-16-d i [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) • Soc�`H1 � i � � rt H i I� 5ck661 S5 5�ne e � � . � t h'113r�O<1 V • PC Ccn t4 , J,6n 1 A San Remo Delve., 50. /* n�a r) Rcch Ca50a Fu Luc 346 Dac5e+ 5heJ" 50 • Gcee� ov�l�a''1 �-�-es, y0 �ors�� C54`�+, 50 `ln r<3 V p�trleC % Lit,��5e4- P CCY�pe� � C 11 r M5 • 6' e-" Macv q 4-a,-n Paw v D�. c-5e 4 51 ont f ", io2 3 Vac-5e4- S-Free -!� 5• Buc-11-n fa" Dated at �b. ?6(1r%town/city], Vermont, this day of abm>a, 20 16 Printed Name: Layc-a. Po 1n a-,-\ Phone number and email: 862-123-38T7, Signature: Date: Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of'Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 �f m . V'c PLANNING & ZONING April 8, 2016 Re: #SP-15-79 — 372 Dorset Street Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6)a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) mnnthc If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer I :k Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7015 0640 0007 8199 3587 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburI.com April 7, 2016 Re: #SP-15-79A Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six(6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com ,►r,01,►W'WilN southburlington, PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-- (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑ Administrative ❑ Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD_(Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax ft /A 9 � �, c%Q' � .Q v e �c1 d � Cvl/^��"7? 4. V fi 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax ft jo�,, Jy T V`S� 334 Crbu3r%--P�tm DQ '3tIc4c:)cvf V+ te jc, -ra,4i got ?5&- &97C-, 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, . address, phone & fax ft �� SV 4A V �ky 334 C-0 tovjji • M , B v d pp t/i Ur 6 S 73q gox '7_S rc—(e C7& 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: wY1SVJ(e gAhoo' G0M 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): A M&,"efcss sheI+<- v Wh.ek WWII nv-evo(.e Y�0'r IN b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): , /� T / cvt'l' 114 V Q CA. V►'r V Me V- l (A -1 " A 16 &1, Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new uke and existing uses to remain): Cp,,,9tjr-> hD me %h aAr,el ems S he14-err d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): �jb Cie e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): ® ne _64-{j�u�d I � f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): old Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 0 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 16 1730 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 37 % / a sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / j " " sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yar��each street) Existing d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) IL` sq. ft. sa. ft. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations) b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: $ CVpI r&rlov 6A L rbwers lfodlr 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: In -e- 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shal submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Fi ) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site p ust be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. "' 0 N'n Jyh Aro Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: I/J Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: YJ Complete 7M The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 4 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ray From: Yon Svitaysky <jonsvit@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 11:26 AM To: ray Subject: Re: 372 Dorset Street Application Thanks for the Note, Ray. I would like to request a continuance to the March 15, 2016 Meeting. I realize there is a $50 Fee... On Friday, February 19, 2016 9:47 AM, ray <ray@sburl.com> wrote: Jon, I received your voice mail that you were going to request a continuance. Please send me an email with this request and indicate to which meeting you wanted to be continued to. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitV.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. piZZAGALLI BUILDING 1 I 1 I 1 I a 1 ICANOEIMPORTS 1 O i v I rn I 1 I I RE LOCATED HVDRNIT NEW B"GATE VALVE 1 NEW 4' GATE VALVE EXISTING T D1 WATERLINEI \\ 1 W IRTING 3/4"CWP T TRANS ON COUPL NG WATERSERVICE ci S SPACE 1 � 1 STORAGE ZIT, SF 1 13 T2"� 1 3-Sarah Bernhardt Peony SITE 3-Neon Flash Spirea 3-Goat's Beard 7-Moonbeam Threadleaf Tickseed 1-Black Chokeberry ! v I Planting Schedule Count Common Name Item Description In 1 Shrub. a 1 Black Chokebe" Aronia melanocarpa N\ I 3 Neon Flash Spirea Spiraea japonica 'Neon Flash' Herbaces 3 GOdt'S Beard ou. Aluncus dioicus 7 Moonbeam Threadleaf Tickseed Coreopsls vertlallata'Moonbeam' 1 1 3 Sarah Bernhardt Peony Paeonla Sarah Bernhardt' IEstimated Landscaping Value = $900 I� I I I 1 372 DORSET STREET LLC 1 372 DORSET STREET /////////---��------ �APPRo%IMATE LOcnnoN SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT a.a �EXISTINGBOUNDARYLINE 1 NIF NEW GREEN AREA SCALE: V=10 Unit #3 #2 #2 #1 COMBINATION OF IAWN �o AND PLANTINGS i DFFICE BUILDING ISTING CURB STOP E%ISDNG.-COPPER ♦ WATER SERVICE EXISTING B"01 WATERLINE ♦ � NEW 4•CL y3 DI WATERLINE EXISTING GINtB STOP !NUMEROUS UNDERGROUND -♦ �« UTILITIES APPEARTOBELOCATED ETNEEN THE CURB AND FACE of EXISTING SEWER ! BUILDING IN T LONrACT * MANHOLE (TYPICAL) OIGOAFE PRIORR TO TO ANY ANV EXCAVATION ® SEE SHEET DT-1 FOR DETAIL OF ISTING 1Y UI WATERLINE THIS AREAAND NEW CONNECTION y ___s --Y -- N y ---g --E --� �uanr�lsry GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. --s--T-�-y- DORSET STREET FRS_ E%ISTINGCATCH BASIN (TYPICAL) COVERAGE CALCULATIONS wBRENrL,aTTIN:o.,. F_.To;a°sE ° IRGAAD DER owl BBERTL.E.InTIR=�IRD I�RIDT N nTRE. E Ginkgo Design,Solutions Smart LoncIscape 22 ft—I Sheet Den ed by David Bnrltm, VCH F soc Ict, \T 05453 Verm t Certified HottiCNllunnf 1R01857-5104 ww Gfi,lgoLks�gnYl'.vcom VICINITY MAP LEGEND NOTE. EXISTING WATERLINE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON A PLAN ENTITLED "DORSET STREET WATER MAIN RELOCATION, SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT, PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 124-00 TO STA. 130+OD', AS PREPARED BY THE CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT, DATED AUGUST 1993. ❑❑ .!,♦♦, �F �,♦hQ` F, ,ice 6:... = "� �—No. 5260 RECEIVED City of So. Burlington NEW B• GATE VALVE' —NEW6 XB X<'TEE WATER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL NTS LECT EXCAVATED MATERIAL TNT DENSITY C OF THE 3 IN METER. COMPACT IN J VARIES e ...RDENSITY 9 NG O DENSITY OF 9SB THE STANDARD PROCTOR OF THE UM DRY DENSITY . e ^ TEST ACCORDING TO ASTM OW8 WATER P PECL ED O TEST, ACCORDING TO USING THE ""I"ASTM R98 / A X SS EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM TO AGO NSULAT ON USE TWO LAYERS D` SACKF LL ABOVE iN.ULAi ON TH CN, W TH CALLED STAGGERED -TALL SWILL BE PLACED CAREFULLY ',♦ WHEREVER CALLED FOR uTHE PLANS a S SOLID FOR AREAS CALLING FOR NSULATON, I1 CROWNOF lEBEDDNG TO ABOVE SMOOTH AREA BEFORE -'-'"/ PLACEMENT OF INSULATION SAID OR GRANULAR PIPE BEDDING OF TH ACTIN TO A RN91TY OF 95% DUCTILE IRON WATERLINE----" - OFTHEMAXIMUMRY ROCTO TEST, ACCORDING TO ASTM G698 TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL, DUCTILE IRON WATERLINE NTS 1N RACIUB-- �1O RADIUS 1" 4� OW PSI TCONCRETE L9MOTES ^ J TION9 WITH 1/1 JOINTS E—N SECTIONS. T. SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY N' WITH il<• THICK PREFORMED PANSICN JOINT FILLER MATERIAL CONFORMING TO AASHTO DESIGNATION M-1533. FUEL N PL AT RIVEWAY9SHALL BE 1-1?'MAXIMUM. ALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 1N'. SHALL5 ILL EACH LE= BFORMED USING FLEXIBLE FORMS. THE PLANT MIXED GRAVEL SHALLBE COMPACTED TO A DENSITY OF N%OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY USING THE STANDARD PROCTOR TEST, ACCORDING TO TYPICAL CONCRETE CURB DETAIL NTS WIDTH AB SHOWN ON PLANS -.. -_.. BROOM FINISH WITH i"TOPSOL FERTILIZE W 9- LIME .9E...MULCH y"THICK A 000 PSI SURFACE ONALEGATE RAMPS CEMENT CONCRETE 1 /<9PE CAST �_S"PLANT MIXEOGRAVEL IN EXPANSIONS ON JOINT EVERY 20 FEET WALK N A O T. SPEC. SHALL BE GROOVED EVERY 5 FEET PNT MIXED GRAVEL SHALL BE COMPACTEDTO MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY USING THE STANDARD PROCTOR TEST, ACCORDNG TOASTM GSNI TYPICAL CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL NTS TYPICAL TEES AND CAPS ZLPICAL BENDS 3- PSI CONCRETE RUST BLOCK . I � AREA IT UNDISTURBEDSOL NOTES. ALL BOLTS AND NUTS TO REMAIN ACCESSIBLE AND ARE TO BE COVERED WITH PLASTIC TO PREVENT CONCRETE FROM ADHERING TO THEM. BASED ON TESTING PRESSURE OF 200 PSI AND BEARING CAPACITY OF SAND R 2000 LBSISOUARE FOOT. 0 80 "G W' TEES OR ND CAPS 4.0 VALVES 0 20 THRUST BLOCK END AREA (SO. FT. BEARING AREA) N. TYPE II BITUMINOUS CONCRETE --A5 REQUIRED TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT THICKNESS (1-1/2" MIN.) EXISTING BITUMINWS �12 MIN. TYP. EMULSIFIED ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMNT ' TACK COAT, RS-1 1"TYPE III BITUMINOUS % CONCRETE WEARING COURSE PLANT MIXED GRAVE " EXISTING TO SUBBASE MATCH EXISTING SUBBASE (12" MINNUM) EXISTING\ SUBBASE.'.. L---- --- TRENCH EXCAVATION- - PLN ANT MIXED GRAVEL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO SLIOOTII-CUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS 95R OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY USING THE STANDARD PROCTOR TEST. ACCORDING TO ASTM CONCRETE PRIOR TO PANNG. 0698, JOINTS SHALL BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED - TYPICAL REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT NTs . N HAR1; p ALLYDRANT. SHALLOID BE RESTRANEGAIITHOUCTILEIRON / EXISTING HYDRANT '3"P+Ing"TYPE CONNECTIONS A✓ 1 _NEWVALVEBOX I NEW 6'GA vE TIGLllT%LLJ SEi TO GRADE W �NRET E RUENEW BX XC TEE I1 1111FEET WITH ANCHORS l CRUSHEDSTONE ORA NAGE AREA 6 NETALLED USING THE LONGEST POSSIBLE LENGTHS TO MINI MGE -CRUSHEDSTONE THE NUMBER OF JOINTS EAREA TYPICAL HYDRANT RELOCATION DETAIL NTS OMN ¢ ---SEPARAT qW DST g3TANCE-_ -- 3 � PARALLEL INSTALLATION CENTER OWE LENGTH OF PIPE OVER THE SEWER WATEE:�= SEPARAT ON 0 SMTANCE CROSSINGS SEWER - WATER SEPARATION NOTES HORILEONTAL SEPARATION SE LAID AT LEAST TEN FEET HORIZONTAIv FROM ANY ExIsnNG off PROPOSED WATER MAIN THE gSTANHALL CE SBEMERUREDEOGEOFPIPETOEGGEOFEEE WHEREIMPRACTICAL DUE TO LEDGE BOULDERS OR OTHER UNUSUAL CONDTIONG TO MANTAN TN FOOT HORI2OWTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN.EWER AND WATER LINES, THE WATER LINE MAY BE IN A SEPARATE TRENCH R R AN UNDISTURBED EARTH SHELF IN THE -WE RENCH PRO—E. LINE IS A LEAST 1S" OF THE SEWER EREVRI WHMPOSSIBLEORN_''IF TOMAINTAIN tB"OTITCAL SEP RATION, THE SEWER LINE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO NORMAL WATERLINE KTANDARCC AKE PRESSURE TESTED TO 50 PSI FOR 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO BACKFILLI NG. NO LEAKAGE SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR THIS TEST. CROSS_ SEWER CROSSING WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID BENEATH THE WATER MAIN WITH AT LEAST 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE TOP OF THE SEWER AND THE BOTTOM OF THE WATERMAIN. WHEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE 1B" VERTICAL SEPARATION OR WHERE THE SEWER MUST BE LAID ABOVE THE WATER MAIN. 11)POSSIBLE THE CROSSING SHALL BE ARRANGESFROM ONE FULL ENGTH OF SEWER IS CENTEREDABOVE OR BELOW THE WATER LINE NTS 2HTHE SEWER PIPE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 2D FEET EITHER SIDE OF E CROSSING OR A TOTAL OF THREE PIPE LENGTHS WHICHIEVER IS GREATER 3THE SECTION CONSTRUCTED TO WATER MAN STANDARDS MUST BE PRESSURE TESTED TO MAINTAIN 50 PBI FOR 15 MINUTES WITHOUT LEAKAGE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING BEYOND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE PIPE TO ASSURE WATER TIGHTNESS. PRWHEREEVENTDWRATAEGE AiN HE WATERUNARR A SEWER. ADEQUATE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE SEWER TO TYPICAL SEWER - WATER SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS ETI T PFOR 1 ENWIH BALLVATE 8 REPLACEMENT OF CAP ANO VARIES- - -INTERIOR WATER PIPING BY OTHERS VALVE BOX SET 0 TO GRACE (2) SIROESX WITH DUCLLXIS (DOUBLE SEA.AN) COIXEOR MBrH ALL JOINTS BETWEEN MAIN AND APPROVED EOUAI OR AN BUILDING. SHALL BE RESTRAINED WITH DUCTILE IRON Gm-g• TYPE 3 CONNECTORS 9 _GUEEVE SLI FOUNDATION_ 4 '_(ttP.I BY OTHERS PHRUST BLOCK T , THRUST BLOCK e iOBE INSTA-11 FOOTING USING THE LONGESTEGSBISL TYPICAL WATER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL NTS A : iiNo. 52602 j W - i ��(^S;•:ec/STY":V 01010 SUMMARY OF WORK AND SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES Seed mix for lawn areas shall be Urban Mix as described in section 02820. Seed mix for slopes steeper than 4:1 (H:V) shall be Conservation Mix as described in section 02820. SHOP DRAWINGS: The contractor shall submit shop drawing's to the Engineer for approval for the following items: Seed mix, erosion control matting, hydrants, all pipe, valves and valve boxes, and geotextile fabrics. The contractor shall also submit gradation curves for sand, plant mixed gravel, and dense graded crushed stone. PERMITS: The contractor shall insure that all permits and licenses have been obtained and all required fees have been paid prior to the commencement of work. Soils: The contractor shall submit proctor test results for native materials and subbase materials to be used. The contractor shall be responsible for providing compaction test results. Compaction tests shall be performed at a rate of 1 per 50' of pipe in trench per lift, and 1 per 2,500 sq. ft. of fill area per lift. 01011 GENERAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT WORK INCLUDED: This section pertains to the general contract requirements which must be met by the Contractor and the project management and control standards which must be utilized by the Contractor. MANAGEMENT OF PROJECT SITE: The Contractor shall ensure that at the end of each working day, the job site shall be left in a condition satisfactory to the Engineer. All excess and unnecessary construction equipment and debris shall be removed from the job site as work progresses. The Contractor shall be responsible for protecting all existing structures and work completed under this Project at his own expense. The Contractor shall take all precautions and institute such procedures as are necessary to protect both life and property. All work, which, during its progress or before the final acceptance of the work as established by the Engineer's Certificate of Completion, may have become damaged from any cause, shall be removed and replaced at the Contractors expense, for both labor and materials. Care shall be exercised on the part of the Contractor to ensure that property damage does not occur on private property and that as little damage as possible is done within construction easements. Protection will be afforded cultivated trees and shrubbery, fences and walls, and similar features where adjacent to the construction. The Conhactor is responsible for ensuring that the condition of private property or easement lands is restored to the condition which existed prior to the construction. The Contractor shall be held responsible for all damages resulting from a failure to comply with the provisions of this section. PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF EXISTING UTILITIES: Wherever culverts, sewers, drains, manholes, catch basin connections, water mains, valve chambers, electrical conduits, telephone conduits, utility poles, overhead lines, or other facilities are encountered, they shall be protected and supported by the Contractor, at his own expense, by methods approved by the Engineer until the excavation is backfilled and the existing facilities are made secure. Injury to any such facilities caused by or resulting from the Contractors operations, shall be repaired at the Contractors expense within a time period that will not place an unreasonable burden on the users. The City of South Burlington, Engineer and the Authority having charge shall be notified promptly of any damage to utilities. Whenever the Engineer may require, pipes or other underground structures encountered in excavating or trenching shall be permanently supported with wooden supports across excavation or trench, or by other methods acceptable to the Engineer. RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES: In case it shall become necessary, in the opinion of the Engineer, to move or reconstruct any water main, electrical conduit, telephone conduit, any connections thereto or any appurtenant structures, work will be done by the Contractor. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing notice to users before interrupting service. Unless specifically provided for in this contract, reconstruction of the utilities shall be at the Contractors expense. In no case shall the Contractor after any water main, electric conduit, telephone conduit or any underground cabin, conduits or structures, without written permission of the Engineer or unfit the Engineer is satisfied that adequate warning to the users has been provided. PROTECTION OF WATER SUPPLIES: Wherever sewers and water mains cross, construction shall be done in accordance with the "Sewer -Water Separation Details for Crossings" shown on the plans. Where sewers and water mains will be parallel to each other, there shall be a minimum separation distance of ten (10) feet, measured edge to edge of pipe. If such distance cannot be maintained, as determined by the Engineer, the distance can be reduced, providing the water main is in a separate trench or on an undisturbed earth shelf located on one side of the sewer and at an elevation so the bottom of the water main is at least 18 inches above the top of the sewer. WORK OUTSIDE RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND EASEMENTS: The Contractor shall not enter or occupy with men, tools, materials or equipment, any land outside the rights -of - way or easement limits. A copy of the written consent shall be provided to the Engineer. WORK TO CONFORM: During its progress and on its completion, all work shall conform truly to the lines, levels and grades indicated on the drawings or given by the Engineer and shall be built in a thoroughly substantial and workmanlike manner, in accordance with the drawings and specifications and the directions, given from time to time by the Engineer. In no case shall any work in excess of the requirements of the drawings and specifications be paid for unless ordered in writing by the Engineer. PERMITS: It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to insure all federal, state, regional or local permits are in place prior to the start of the construction of the project. The Contractor is also responsible for maintaining these permits in force during the length of the contract and for taking all required actions to comply with the content of these permits and permits previously obtained for the project. COMPACTION: At the preconstruction conference, the Contractor shall be required to submit, in writing, to the Engineer, for approval, the method(s) to be utilized to meet the compaction requirements contained in these Specifications. The Contractor will be P q P required to have specialized compaction equipment on the job site as may be needed to properly compact materials specifically for this project. Pieces of equipment such as Pr P N P Pa N P J vibratinglate compactors, tampers, yammers, vibrato rollers, shee toot rollers, P er Pe vibratory the wobbly wheeled rollers rubber tired rollerssteel wheeled rollers and the like shell be Y considered suitable equipment for compaction. Such pieces of equipment as backhoe buckets, bulldozers and the like shall not be considered for use as compaction equipment unless specifically approved by the Engineer for special cases. SUPERVISORS ON THE JOB SITE: The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that there is a Supervisor under his direct employ on the job site at all times that construction is underway, whether or not the construction is being accomplished by the Prime Contractor or Subcontractors hired by the Prime Contractor. SITE RESTORATION: Preconstruction photographs shall be taken by The Owner or his representative of all areas to be affected by this contract. These photographs will be utilized upon completion of construction to establish satisfactory compliance with restoration of site to preconstruction condition. All previously vegetated areas which have been disturbed as a result of this construction shall be graded, topsoiled, seeded and mulched as per Section 02820 prior to October 1. 01030 UNDERGROUND UTILITY DAMAGE PREVENTION - "DIGSAFE" Before the Contractor removes soil or rock to create an open space in the earth greater than one foot in depth by means of any powered or mechanized equipment within an underground utility easement or in the area of a public right-of-way in which an underground utility may be located, the Contractor shall nobly "Digsafe" by calling their toll -free number 1-888-344-7233. Digsafe will then notify all utility companies having underground utilities in that area so that they can mark the location of these facilities. The utility companies should mark their lines within forty eight hours from the time Digsafe was notified (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays). Sewer and water facilities shall not be classified as a "utility" under this Specification. Emergency excavations are exempt from this requirement. Effective January 1, 1988, the mandatory notification of Digsafe in the above mentioned situations became Vermont State Law. A fine of $1,000 may be levied for failure to telephone Digests before an excavation is made. 01080 APPLICABLE CODES MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS: All materials, unless specified otherwise, utilized on this contract shall be subject to the approval of the Engineer and shall meet the applicable requirements of the latest published specifications and standards of the following institutions, associations or departments. American Concrete Institute American Society of Testing and Materials American Institute of Steel Construction American Water Works Association VemhontAgency of Transportation - "Standard Specifications for Highway and Bridge Construction" American Welding Society National Electrical Code National Plumbing Code All Applicable State and Local Codes and Permits ABBREVIATIONS AND REFERENCES: Where reference is made to a specification of one of the below mentioned or other associations or societies, it is understood that the serial designation of specification in effect at the sate of receipt of bids shall take precedence over those listed below. ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials ASA American Standards Association AW WA American Water Works Association AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ACI American Concrete Institute AGMA American Gear Manufacturers Association ANSI American National Standards Institute AISC American Institute of Steel Construction ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers AIA American Institute of Architects ASSE American Society of Sanitary Engineers AGC American General Contractors of America CEC Consulting Engineers Council EPA Environmental Protection Agency IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers NBFU National Board of Fire Underwriters NBS National Bureau of Standards NSPE National Society of Professional Engineers NEW WA New England Water Works Association NEC National Electric Code NEMA National Electrical Manufacturers Association PCA Portland Cement Association SCPI Structural Clay Products Institute UL Underwriters' Laboratories WPCF Water Pollution Control Federation 01500 TEMPORARY FACILITIES WORK INCLUDED: Included in this section pertains to the Contractor's responsibility of providing temporary facilities The Contractor shall be responsible for and shall bear at his own expense all temporary facilities necessary for the proper fulfillment of the Contract, including but not limited to all temporary electricity, lighting, heating and ventilation, telephone service, water, sanitary facilities, safety and first aid facilites. The Contractor shall make all arrangements for temporary facilities well in advance of need so as to not delay construction. All temporary facilities shall be adequate to perform the function for which they are intended without risk of personal or property damage to any individual. 01560 SPECIAL CONTROLS WORK INCLUDED: Work included in this section pertains to the special controls which the Contractor must institute and maintain during the length of the Contract. DUST CONTROL: The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that the dust created as a result of construction activities does not create a nuisance or a safety hazard. Where and when deemed necessary the Contractor will be required to wet sections of the construction area with water or apply calcium chloride or sweep the roadway with a power broom as dust control measures. Dust control measures shall be provided at all times, including evenings and weekends. WATER CONTROL: The Contractor shall take all necessary measures to handle all water in excavations, shall furnish all materials and equipment and shall do all incidental work to keep the excavation entirety clear of water while pipelines, ponds, structures and their foundations are being built. The Contractor shall be responsible for choosing the method for control of water and shall assume all responsibility for the adequacy of the methods chosen. No construction shall be undertaken if, in the opinion of the Engineer, adequate control of water is not assured. WATERTIGHTNESS: It is the responsibility of the Contractor to ensure that all new structures, pipes and equipment built under this contract for the purpose of containing water or other fluids or for conveying such liquids are watertight under all operating conditions for which they are intended. Any pipe or structures, where leakage is determined to be excessive by the Engineer, shall be subject to correction or replacement by the Contractor at his own expense POLLUTION CONTROL: During the construction period, the Contractor shall exercise every reasonable precaution to prevent pollution of the waters of the State. Pollutants such as chemicals, paints, fuels, lubricants, bitumens, raw sewage, sediment, and other harmful waste shall not be discharged into or alongside these waters or into natural or man-made channels leading thereto. Applicable statues and regulations of the Vermont State Agency of Environmental Engineering relafing to the prevention and abatement of pollution shall be complied with. 01569 PROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC WORK INCLUDED: Work included in this section pertains to the Contractor's responsibility to protect the public and workmen. The public shall be protected by the Contractor from any and all hazards connected with the work. Open trenches, materials or other equipment within the working limits are to be guarded by the use of adequate barricades, snow fence or flagmen. All barricades left in position overnight are to be property lighted. The Contractor shall be held responsible for the safety of all workmen and the general public and all damages to property occurring from or upon the work occasioned by negligence or otherwise, growing out of a failure on the part of the Contractor to protect persons or property from hazard of open trenches, materials or equipment at any time of the day or night within the working area. All work shall be in conformance with OSHA regulations, Title 19, Parts 1926.651 and applicable VOSHA regulations. 01570 MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC WORK INCLUDED: This section includes the methods the Contractor shall employ to maintain and protect traffic. The Contractor shall provide uniformed traffic police of flagmen as deemed necessary by the Engineer and/or governmental agencies. The Contractor shall, as conditions warrant, employ flagmen at any location on the project where his equipment or construction operations are such that they will in any manner interfere with the movement or safety of the traveling public. The Contractor shall erect warning signs in advance of any place on the project where operations may interfere with the use of the road by traffic and at all intermediate points where the project crosses or coincides with an existing road. Such warning signs shall be constructed and erected in accordance with the latest edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, published by the Federal Highway Administration. The cost of traffic police services occasioned by the Contract shall be paid for by the Contractor. The cost of uniformed traffic police will not be paid separately but shall be included in the prices stated in the several items of work in the Schedule of Prices in the Proposal. Two-way traffic shall be maintained unless otherwise authorized by the Engineer. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer, local police and fire departments as well as municipal officials at least 72 hours in advance of any intent to close streets. The Contractor shall work with the local government to establish a suitable alternate route, and shall at his own expense, provide and maintain suitably marked and well lighted detour signs. The employment or presence of traffic flagmen or uniformed police does not relieve the Contractor of any responsibility or liability under this contract. 02100 CLEARING, GRUBBING, AND STRIPPING OF TOPSOIL WORK INCLUDED: The Contractor shall do all clearing, grubbing and stripping necessary to permit construction of the work within the limits of the property or easements indicated in the drawings. CLEARING AND GRUBBING: The Contractor shall do all necessary work of clearing and shall dispose of all material, including trees and brush as may be approved by the Engineer. Disposal shall comply with local ordinances. All areas cleared shall be left clean and presentable. Except within actual lines of trenches, manholes, roadways or sidewalks to be built, where trees must be removed, no live trees with trunks over four (4) inches in diameter shall be removed unless otherwise required or approved by the Engineer. Clearing shall be done in such a manner that present growth will merge with the construction limits to give a natural appearance. The Contractor shall remove all stumps and roots within permanent rights -of -way. STRIPPING TOPSOIL: In general, where construction is not in roadways, it is carded across private and public rights -of -way, presently covered with topsoil. After trenching and pipe laying operation or construction of structures is completed, excess material shall be removed and area graded, provided with topsoil and seeded as specified in Section 02820. Ground surface shall be left in a condition equal to that which existed before construction. 02221 PIPELINE TRENCHES AND EXCAVATIONS FOR STRUCTURES WORK INCLUDED: The Contractor shall excavate to normal depth in earth for structures and trenches, backfill such excavations and grade and topsoil as necessary, as shown on the Contract Drawings or as directed by the Engineer. GENERAL: The trenches and other excavations shall be of sufficient width and depth at all points to allow all pipes to be laid, joints to be formed and structures and appurtenant construction to be built in the most thorough and workmanlike manner and to allow for sheeting and shoring, pumping and draining and for removing and replacing unsuitable material. Trenches and excavations shall be at least twelve inches wider than the outside dimensions of the structure they are to contain; trenches must not be unnecessarily wide so as to materially increase load on the pipe resulting from backfill. Bottoms of trenches and other excavations shall be carried to lines and shapes satisfactory to the Engineer. Bottoms of trenches for pipe shall be carded to a depth six inches greater than grade of line refilled to grade and bedded in the specified 9 9 pipeline, 9 P beddingmethod as detailed on the Contract Drawings. No tunneling will be Permitted 9 9 in place of open trench construction unless specifically authorized by the Engineer. Excavations adjacent to existing underground structures shall be done by hand so that foundations of structures shall not be disturbed. Wherever boulders or ledge rock are encountered in excavations for pipelines or structures, such boulders or ledge rock shall be removed to a depth of six inches below grade and space occupied by them shall be refilled to grade with the specified bedding material. Trenches shall be opened at such times and to such extent only as may be permitted by the Engineer. All driveways, crosswalks, sod, shrubs, trees and any other surface material affected by the work shall be carefully taken up and kept separate from the other excavated material. If suitable, excavated material shall be used for embankments, backfill and fill. Ste slopes of excavations shall be less than the angle of repose of material excavated and shall be flat enough to prevent slides or cave-ins. Any excavation required as a result of slides or cave-ins shall be done by the Contractor at his own expense. Placement of bedding material shall not be done until the ground has been thoroughly dewatered and the Contractor is ready to install pipe or to construct foundations of various structures. LENGTH OF TRENCH ALLOWED TO BE OPEN: Length of trench allowed to be open shall be determined by the Engineer. The total running length of all work in each section shall be kept as short as is practical. Only that length of trench which can be protected by means of barricades, fences, and the like shall be allowed to remain open overnight. Unless specifically permitted by the Engineer, all trench excavations shall be backfilled prior to work shut -down for each weekend. MISCELLANEOUS EARTH EXCAVATION: Wherever required by the Engineer, the Contractor shall do earth excavation and backfilling in addition to the excavation and backfilling needed to construct the work required by the Contract Documents. Miscellaneous earth excavation and backfilling may be required by the Engineer for test pits or for other unforeseen purposes. It may be necessary to do some of this work by hand. Excavation for deepening or widening of permanent drainage ditches shall be included in this item. Temporary or permanent relocation of streams shall not be considered under miscellaneous earth excavation. EARTH EXCAVATION BELOW GRADE: Wherever, in the opinion of the Engineer, material at or below grade line of pipe or structure plus depth of bedding material is unsuitable for foundations, it shall either be excavated to such additional depths as directed by the Engineer and then refilled with crashed stone, well compacted, or the Engineer may direct that a fitter fabric as defined in Section 02545 be utilized in lieu of deeper excavation. If fitter fabric is utilized, it shall be installed and the excavation then brought to grade line for pipe trenches as shown on the Contract Drawings. UNAUTHORIZED EXCAVATION: If the bottom of any excavation has been removed below grade shown on the Contract Drawings, or that prescribed by the Engineer, it shall be brought to grade at the Contractor's expense by refilling with well compacted bedding material. EARTH EXCAVATION: Earth excavation includes all materials not classified as rock excavation and includes, but is not limited to curbs, sidewalks, pavement, peat, clay, silt, sand, muck, gravel, hardpan, loose shale, loose stone in masses, and boulders measuring less than one cubic yard in volume. 02265 BEDDING FOR PIPE AND BACKFILL WORK INCLUDED: Work of this section pertains to the backfill requirements and definitions of materials utilized in backfill operations which the Contractor must comply with. GENERAL: Each structure or portion of pipeline shall be inspected and approved for bedding and backfill before it is covered. Approval for bedding and backfill will not constitute final acceptance of the structure or pipeline. Any pipeline found to be out of line, deformed or damaged shall be re-laid or replaced without additional compensation. No backfilling will be allowed around manholes or other masonry structures until concrete or masonry has set sufficiently, as determined by the Engineer. All excess fill shall be removed from the construction site by the Contractor, unless directed otherwise by the Engineer, and disposed of in an acceptable manner. The Contractor is responsible for the location of a disposal site and obtaining any necessary permits associated with transportation to or disposal at the site. No excess fill may be stockpiled at the construction site. PIPE BEDDING: Pipe bedding shall be that material in the trench directly adjacent to the pipe. For all plastic piping used for gravity sewer, storm drain, water main or force main, it shall extend from the bottom of the trench, 6" below the invert of the pipe, to a point 6" above the crown of the pipe and shall consist of crushed stone, sand or granular pipe bedding as detailed in the Contract Drawings. For ductile iron gravity sewer, water main or force main and for reinforced concrete or asphalt coated corrugated metal storm drain, the bedding shall extend from the bottom of the trench, 6" below the invertof the pipe, to the spring line of the pipe and shall consist of crushed stone, sand or granular pipe bedding as detailed in the Contract Drawings. The pipe bedding shall be compacted to the minimum density specified on the plans in order to provide uniform support around the pipe. Specific information relative to the pipe bedding to be utilized on this project shall be found on the Contract Drawings and under the sections covering specific types of pipe materials, Sections 02520 and 02555 as appropriate. PIPE BACKFILL: Pipe backfill for this Project shall include all material placed above the pipe bedding to within 4" of finished grade or to road subgrade as shown on the Contract Drawings for pipes under roads and shall be selected compactable soil material from the excavation. Materials used for backfill shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the Engineer. If in the opinion of the Engineer the excavated material is unsuitable for backfill, the Contractor shall dispose of the material and substitute approved sand, gravel or other material in the amounts and proportions specified by the Engineer. Frozen material shall not be placed in backfills and backfills shall not be placed on frozen material. No stones in excess of 3" diameter shall be placed Within 2 feet of the pipe. Larger stones may be used in the backfill provided care is taken that stones do not become nested and that all voids between stones are completely filled with fine materials. The size and quantities of stone used in backfill will be subject to approval by the Engineer. No backfill shall be dropped from a height of more than 3 feet from the top of the pipe. The backfill shall consist of two separate zones. The first zone shall extend from the top of the bedding material to a height of 24" above the crown of the pipe. Select excavated material with stones no larger than 3" diameter shall be placed in 6" lifts and compacted to a density of 95% of the maximum dry density using the Standard Proctor Test, awarding to ASTM D698 or AASHTO T99 (latest version). The materials shall be placed carefully so as not to disturb the pipe or cause it to break or misalign. The second zone shall extend from the top of the that zone to within 4" of finished grade or to road subgrade. Material in this zone shall be select excavated material, placed in 6" lifts and compacted to a density of 95% of maximum dry density using the Standard Proctor Test, according to ASTM D698 or AASHTO T99 (latest version). Suitable cohesive soil can be backfilled in this zone and compacted using impact type equipment, pneumatic tampers, engine or self-propelled, sheepsfoot rollers on wide trenches or other suitable equipment, providing the 95% compaction requirement is whet. In or other suitable soils, vibratory plates in confined areas and vibratory rollers in unconfined areas can be utilized, providing the specified degree of compaction Is met. Granular cohesionless material may, in some cases and upon approval of the Engineer, be compacted using water jetting or immersion vibrators with flooding 9 Pe 9 J 9 type 9 and pooling. The entire trench width shall be uniformly compacted and brought to grade. The remaining 4" of trench between the top of the backfill and the final surface, on areas to be seeded or sodded, shall be backfilled with topsoil, compacted and finished in accordance with Section 02820, Final Grading, Topsoiling and Seeding of these Specifications. If the area is to be paved, the upper zone must be constructed in accordance with Section 02650. be replaced with finer material and recompacted before retesting. Additional field tests necessary, because of failure of the first test to comply with stated density requirements, shall be provided by the Contractor at no additional cost to The Owner. The field density determination will be made in accordance with Standard Method of Testing for Density of Soil In -Place by the Sand Cone Method, ASTM D1556 (AASHTO T191) or using Nuclear Methods in accordance with ASTM D2922 or AASHTO T238. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS: This section pertains to the specifications which the Contractor must comply with regarding the quality and type of material to be utilized for fill, backfill and embankment operations. GRANULAR PIPE BEDDING AND BACKFILL: Where reference is made to this material either on the plans or within these specifications, it shall mean a well graded material free from debris, stumps, branches, vegetation, pavement and similar objectionable material. It shall meet the gradation requirements for granular backfill defined as follows: Percentage by Weight Square Mesh Sieves Sieve Desionafion Passina Total Sample Sand Portion 3" 100% --- 2-1/7 90%-100% --- No.4 50%-100% 100% No. 100 --- 0%-18% No. 200 --- 0% -8% GRAVEL BORROW: Where reference is made to this material either on the plans or within the specifications, it shall mean a material reasonably free from sift, loam, clay or organic matter containing no more than 8% by weight passing the #200 sieve. It shall be uniformly graded and the largest stone shall not exceed 6" in any dimension. SAND: Sand shall consist of clean, hard durable grains, uniformly graded from dense to fine and shall be free from injurious amounts of sift, loam, clay, organic matter or other harmful substances. It shall meet the gradation requirements for sand defined as follows: Percentage by Weight Sieve Desiomation Passino Total Samoa tYP' 100% No.4 90%-100% No. 10 60%-90% No. 40 20% - 40% No. 200 0% - 8% CRUSHED STONE: Crushed stone or screened gravel, uniformly graded from 3/4" to 1/4" and of satisfactory quality shall be furnished to replace unsuitable material excavated below grade, to bed pipe, to replaced unauthorized excavation, and to be used elsewhere as shown on the Contract Drawings or as required by the Engineer. It shall be clean, hard, durable and free from dust, loam, clay or organic matter and shall be well compacted in place. STONE FILL: The Contractor shall line specified drainage ditches following excavation with stone fill in reasonably close conformity with the dimensions shown on the plan or as ordered by the Engineer. Stone fill may also be used in the stabilization of embankment, and shall be placed in one course thickness as shown on the Plans in a manner that will result in a reasonably well graded surface. Care shall be taken in the placing to avoid displacing the underlying material. The stones shall be so placed and distributed that there will be no accumulations of either the larger or smaller sizes of stone. Rearrangement of the stone fill by hand labor or mechanical equipment may be required to obtain the specified results. When stone fill and fitter blanket are to be placed as part of an embankment, the protective materials shall be placed concurrently with the construction of the embankment unless otherwise authorized by the Engineer. Where stone fill and filter blanket is to be placed under water, methods shall be used that will minimize segregation and insure that the required thickness of protective material will be obtained. Stone for stone fill shall be approved hard blasted rock. The stone shall be angular in shape and shall not have a smallest dimension less than 1/3 of its longest dimension. The stone fill shall be reasonably well graded from the smallest to the maximum size stone specified so as to form a compact mass when in place. a) Type 1: The longest dimension of the stone shall vary from 1 inch to 12 inches and at least 50 percent of the volume of the stone in place shall have a least dimension of 4 inches. �118, OF ,`E ••,,��i FIELD DENSITY TESTING: Unless specified elsewhere, the Contractor shall provide field density tests to verily that the compaction requirements of this section have been j �Nu•=j met. Material having a gradation with more than 30% retained on the 3/4" sieve will 9 L 9� generally be considered too coarse for satisfactory density testing and therefore shell y. � , ra1c� •,,� �a�itiiiO41 �,,r b) Type 2: The longest dimension of the stone shall vary from 2 inches to 36 inches and at least 50 percent of the volume of the stone in place shall have a least dimension of 12 inches. c) Type 3: The longest dimension of the stone shall vary from 3 inches to 48 inches and at least 50 percent of the volume of the stone in place shall have a least dimension of 16 inches. d) Type 4: The longest dimension of the stone shall vary from 3 inches to 60 inches and at least 50 percent of the volume of the stone in place shall have a least dimension of 20 inches. RIPRAP: The Contractor shall furnish and place riprap in reasonably close conformity to the dimensions, elevations and at the locations indicated on the plans in accordance with these specifications or as ordered by the Engineer. The slopes to be protected shall be graded and shaped to the lines indicated on the plans or as directed by the Engineer and if in a fill area, shall be compacted as per this section. All slopes shall be maintained and protected to the neat lines indicated on the plans prior to the placing of riprap. Stone for dprap shall be approved, rough, unhewn quarry stone, as nearly rectangular in section as practical. The stones shall be hard, sound, resistant to the action of water and weathering and suitable in every respect for the purpose intended. The individual stones shall have a depth equal to the thickness of the course of riprap. The dprap, complete in place, shall consist of stones that have a minimum volume of 8 cubic feet, unless otherwise noted. The voids between the stones shall be chinked with smaller stones to produce a relatively smooth and uniform surface. Rip rap shall generally be placed from an elevation V below the river bottom elevation to the elevation or height specified on the Contract Drawings. 02530 DEWATERING WORK INCLUDED: The work includes all work necessary to provide a stable work area for installation of piping and structures and protecting the work from damage caused by water. The Contractor shall at his expense remove by pumping, draining, bailing or otherwise, any water which may accumulate or be found in trenches and other excavations made under this contract, and shall form all pump wells, sumps, dams, Flumes, or other works necessary to keep trenches and other excavations entirely clear of water while pipe lines and structures and their foundations are being built. Newly made masonry shall be protected from damage resulting from dewatering work, by use of canvas, tar paper, or by such other sufficient methods as may be approved by the Engineer. The Contractor shall at all times, have sufficient pumping machinery so that structures will be buit in the dry. Excavation and trenches shall be dewaternd where necessary by use of stone drains, pipe underdrains, or by use of well points. Pipe used for underdmins shall be of ample size to dewater trench for proper drainage during construction work. Pipe shall be corrugated metal, HDPE, or PVC, as hereinafter specified. Areas to be excavated and trenches shall be excavated to such additional depth as required to lay underdrain in a bed of clean gravel or broken stone. If a well point system is used for dewatering excavation, well points shall be spaced and driven to a depth to thoroughly dewater the construction area. All dewatering, regardless of method, shall be accomplished so that adequate bearing capacity of the soil is reached to allow stable support of pipe lines, structures, and foundations. Removal of visual running water in the trench without provision of stable trench bottom support for piping or structures does not constitute adequate dewatering. The Contractor shall furnish, install and maintain, all drainage systems and pumping equipment necessary to keep ground water level at an elevation low enough so that no structures to be built under this Contract shall move. The Contractor shall construct noise abatement structures around all pumps or machinery that must run after working hours. These structures must provide adequate sound absorption to prevent disturbance of the public. Water from trenches and excavations shall be disposed of in such a manner as will not cause injury to public health nor to public or private property, nor to work completed or in progress, nor to surface of highways, nor cause any interference with use of same by the public. No silty, brackish or turbid water from trenches and excavations shall be allowed to discharge directly to a stream or natural drainage course leading to a stream. The turbid water can be discharged onto the ground providing the subsequent runoff does not create a turbid situation in the stream. Where ground application creates or is likely to create turbid stream conditions, the Contractor will be required to detain the trench excavation water in a temporary sedimentation pond or a similar method acceptable to the Engineer. Upon completion of construction, all temporary sedimentation ponds will be filled with native material and the site restored to its original condition. 02555 DUCTILE IRON WATERLINES AND RELATED CONSTRUCTION WORK INCLUDED: The Contractor shall furnish, install and test all water mains and appurtenances as indicated in the Contract Drawings and Specifications. MATERIALS: Pipes for all waterlines shall be ductile iron pipe of the thickness class designated on the plans. The minimum acceptable thickness pipe shall be the thickness Class designated on the plans. All ductile iron pipe shall be centrifugally cast in molds and shall conform to the latest revision of ANSI Standard A21.51, (AWWA C151) and ANSI Standard A21.11 (AWWA C111), Rubber Gasket Joints for Cast Iron and Ductile Iron Pressure Pipe Fittings and ANSI Standard A21.10 (AWWA C110) Gray -Iron and Ductile Iron Fittings 3 inch through 48 inch of Water and Other Liquids. All ductile iron pipe shall be cement lined and shall conform to ANSI Standard A21.4 (AWWA C104), Cement -Mortar Lining for Ductile Iron Pipe and Gray Iron Pipe and Fittings for Water. All pipe joints, shall be the push -on type, except for joints at fittings and valves which shall be mechanical joint, unless noted otherwise on the plans. All fittings shall have body thickness and radii of curvature conforming to ANSI Standard A21.10 and push - on joints shall conform to Sections 11-2 through 11-5 and 11-7 through 11-8 of ANSI A21.11. The electrical conductivity of the pipeline and attached services shall be maintained at all joints through the use of three brass wedges at each joint or with conduction straps. The electrical conductivity of the pipeline across all couplings, valves, and fittings shall be maintained through the use of conduction straps. No couplings shall be made at any point on the line or attached services without incorporating Porovisions to maintain P electrical conductivity. Mechanical joint, ductile iron pipe shall be the thickness Class designated on the plans, and shall be installed where specified on the plans. Mechanical joint ductile iron pipe shall conform to the Specifications for ductile iron pipe, except for fittings which shall be mechanical joint with body thickness and radius of curvature conforming to ANSI A21.10 and mechanical joints which shall be in accord with Sections 11-2 through 11-6 of ANSI A21.11. All pipe and fittings shall be manufactured by U.S. Pipe and Foundry, Co., Clow or an approved equal. INSPECTION AND TESTING OF MATERIALS: All cast iron pipe and fittings shall be inspected and tested in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and the aforementioned AWWA Specifications. The Contractor shall furnish for approval, certification from pipe manufacturer that all tests have been performed with satisfactory results. Pipe shall not be installed without the Engineers approval. HANDLING: Pipe, fittings and accessories shall be carefully handled to avoid damage. Prior to the date of acceptance of the project work by The Owner, the Contractor shall replace any pipe or accessory found to be defective at any time, including after it has been installed, at no expense to The Owner. The Contractor's attention is called to the fact that the cement lining of the pipe is quite brittle and special care should be taken in handling. All cutting shall be done with a machine having wheel cutters or knives adapted to the purpose except as otherwise approved. All cut ends shall be examined for possible cracks caused by cutting. All pipe showing cracks shall be rejected. If cracks occur in the pipe, the Contractor may, at his expense and with the approval of the Engineer, cut off the cracked portions at a point at least twelve inches from the visible limits of the crack and use the sound portion of the pipe. All pipe and fittings shall be cleared of all foreign matter and debris poor to installation and shall be kept clean until the time of acceptance by The Owner. LAYING PIPE: Pipe shall be laid upon a trench bottom and bed prepared as indicated on the Contract Drawings as specified in this section. Each pipe shall be laid true to line and grade and so laid as to form a tight joint with next adjoining pipe. All installation of pipe shall be done in accordance with AWWA Standard C600. At all times when pipe laying is not actually in progress, the open ends of the pipe shall be closed by temporary watertight plugs or by other approved means. If water is in the trench when work is resumed, the plug shall not be removed until all danger of water entering the pipe has passed. There shall be a minimum of six feet of cover on all pipes and fittings. The pipe shall be installed in trenches and at the line and grade shown on the Contract Drawings. Any deflection at joints shall be within the limits specified by the manufacturer. All piping and appurtenances connected to equipment shall be supported so that no strain will be imposed on the equipment. (If the equipment manufacturers specifications indicate that pipe loads are not to be transferred, the Contractor shall submit certification of compliance). Thrust blocks or properly installed fie rods shall be installed on all plugs, tees, and bends deflecting 11-1/4' or more. Care shall be taken to ensure that concrete will not come in contact with flanges, joints or bolls. The required area of thrust blocks are indicated on the Contract Drawings or shall be as approved by the Engineer. In instances where the use of different types of pipes requires joining, the Contractor shall furnish and install all necessary adapters. All trenching safety standards shall be in conformance with any applicable State and Federal guidelines. No walking on or working over pipes after they are laid except as may be necessary in making joints, in placing cradles and in tamping backfill material will be permitted until pipes are backfilled as specified to a depth of 12 inches. PIPE BEDDING AND BACKFILL: Pipe bedding and backfill for all waterlines shall be as indicated in Section 02265. Pipeline shall be laid on a prepared bed of 6" of sand or gravel and adjusted for proper alignment and grade. Sand or gravel, as indicated on the Contract Drawings, shall then be placed and compacted to the springline of the pipe (centerline). Backfill with excavated material containing stones no larger than 3" shall Men be placed and compacted in 6" lifts to 24" over the pipe crown. Where sub- surface, "in -place" conditions warrant reduced bedding or compactive effort, the Engineer shall make a field determination as to whether the bedding requirements can be reduced. All projects shall use the standard outlined in this section and Section 02265 for pricing and any savings resulting from reduced bedding shall accrue to The Owner. FIELD TESTING: Except as otherwise directed, all pipe lines shall be tested. Pipe lines laid in excavation or bedded in concrete and any exposed piping shall be tested prior to field painting. The Contractor shall furnish all gauges, testing plugs, caps and all other necessary equipment and labor to perform leakage and pressure tests in sections of an approved length. Each valved section or a maximum of one thousand feet of pipe shall be tested. All water required for testing shall be potable. All testing shall be conducted in the presence of the Engineer. The Contractor shall make the necessary provisions to tap the pipe at the high point to release all air and shall plug same after completing the test. Hydrants or blowoffs located at high points may be used for air release in lieu of taps if approved by the Engineer. The pressure and leakage tests shall be performed as a combined test which shall be for a duration of two hours at 150% of normal operating pressure or 200 psi, whichever is more, in the line at the lowest elevation. Leakage shall be defined as the quantity of water that must be supplied into the newly laid pipe to maintain the leakage test pressure after the pipe has been filled and the air has been expelled. No installation will be accepted if the leakage is greater than that determined by the formula: L - SD (P)A.5 148,000 Where L is allowable leakage in gallons per hour, S is the length of pipe being tested, D is the nominal diameter of the pipe in inches, and P is the average test pressure in pounds per square inch gauge. Should any section of pipe fail either the pressure or leakage tests the Contractor shall do everything necessary to locate and repair or replace the defective pipe, fittings or joints at no expense to The Owner. If for any reason, the Engineer should alter the foregoing procedures, the Contractor shall remain responsible for the tightness of the line within the above requirements. DISINFECTION: Chlorination of the water main shall be conducted only after the main has been safisfactorily tested and Flushed and a clean stream is obtained as determined by the Engineer. The Contractor shall furnish all labor, equipment, materials and tools necessary to disinfect the pipe and appurtenances in accordance with AWWA Standard for Disinfecting Water Mains C651 latest revision. The continuous feed method shall be performed under the supervision of the Engineer. The disinfection process shall be deemed acceptable only after samples of water from the flushed, disinfected main show no evidence of bacteriological contamination based on Health Department testing or testing by another approved lab. VALVES: All valves for waterlines shall meet the requirements of Section 15100. HYDRANTS: All hydrants shall meet the requirements of Section 15109. PIPE INSULATION: In areas where there is insufficient cover (i.e. less than five and one half feet) due to sewer pipes, etc. as indicated on the Contract Drawings, all pipe, fittings, etc. shall be insulated. The insulation shall be of extruded polystyrene and have a minimum thickness of 2 inches and shall be installed in strict compliance with the manufacturer's directions. The insulation shall be Styrofoam SM, and shall meet the compressive strength requirements of ASTM 01621-73 and shall be as manufactured by Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan. RECONNECTION OF SERVICES: All services to the existing water main shall be reconnected to the new main with pipe of equal size, and shall be provided with a corporation stop or valve as applicable. 02650 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT GENERAL: All road work and paving shall conform to the latest edition of the Vermont Agency of Transportation's Standard Specifications for construction. 02820 FINAL GRADING, TOPSOILING AND SEEDING WORK INCLUDED: The Contractor shall be responsible for final grading, topsoiling, seeding, and establishing a healthy grass within the contract limits or as directed by the Engineer. Restoration shall occur within 7 days of the time the work is ready to receive topsoil. GRADING AND TOPSOILING AND SURFACE PREPARATION: Where required, areas to be finished with topsoil shall be cleaned of all stones, debris and other kinds of rubbish. After areas have been brought to proper subgrade and approved by the Engineer, topsoil shall be spread to a depth of 4", due allowance being made for settlement. Topsoil shall not be hauled over, tramped over or packed in, in any way, and shall be left in a loose and friable condition. All topsoil shall be free from subsoil, gravel, roots, stones and shall be screened. Topsoil shall receive a uniform application of fertilizer, lime, grass seed, and mulch. Any mechanical operation may be used which will place the limestone, fertilizer, seed and mulch, or any combination of these in direct contact with the soil and which meets the approval ofthe Engineer. FERTILIZATION: The fertilizer shall be a standard commercial grade fertilizer and shall conform to the requirements of the State Fertilizer Law and to the Standards of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Dry fertilizer, if used, shall be furnished in new, clean, sealed and properly labeled bags not exceeding 100 pounds each. Caked or damaged fertilizer shall not be used. Dry fertilizer shall contain not less than 10 peroerd nitrogen, 20 percent phosphate, and 10 percent potash and shall be applied at the rate of 850 pounds per acre. Liquid fertilizer if used in lieu of dry fertilizer, shall be applied in 1:2:1 ratio with the minimum rate to include 50 pounds of nitrogen, 100 pounds phosphate, and 50 pounds of potash per acre. The limestone shall be a calcitic or dolomitic ground limestone containing not less than 85% of total (calcium or magnesium) carbonates. The limestone shall conform to the requirements of all state and federal regulations and to the Standards of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. The limestone shall be furnished in new, clean, sealed and properly labeled bags not exceeding 100 pounds each. Caked or damaged limestone shall not be acceptable. The limestone shall be applied at a rate of 1 ton per acre or as directed. Pelletized lime is recommended. SEED MIXES: The specific seed mixes to be utilized on this project are indicated in Section 01010 of these specifications. All mixes for this project are available from L.D. Oliver Seed Co., through local distributors. shall be mulched with a hay mulch. Mulch shall consist of mowed hay property free from swamp grass, weeds, twigs, debris or other deleterious material. It shall be free from rot or mold and shall be acceptable to the Engineer. Spreading by mechanical spreading devices may be used if approved by the Engineer. The application of mulch shall be made in such a manner that lumps and thick spots are avoided. When deemed necessary, mulch shall be anchored by a light coating of brush or tree branches, use of stakes, twine, netting or other methods approved by the Engineer. WATERING AND PRESERVATION OF GRASS COVER: All seeded areas shall be watered and maintained to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Within two weeks after the grass has come up, any areas where grass seed has not germinated property or where the surface has been washed or damaged in any way, shall be re -seeded as before. The grass cover shall be inspected again by the Engineer and Contractor during the month of May following completion of the work. Any areas where grass seed has not germinated property or where the surface has been washed or damaged in any way shall be topsoiled and reseeded as before. 15100 VALVES AND VALVE BOXES WORK INCLUDED: Work of this section pertains to the valves and valve boxes to be utilized on all new or reconstructed waterlines, at the locations shown on the Contract Drawings or as directed by the Engineer. VALVES: Valves 3" to 12" in diameter shall be resilient -seated gate valves meeting all applicable requirements of AWWA C509, as manufactured by the Clow Corporation or an approved equal. The resilient wedge shall be permanently bonded to meet ASTM D429 testing for rubber metal bond. Valves greater than 12" in diameter shall be double disc gate valves meeting all applicable requirements of AWWA C500, as manufactured by Clow Corporation or an approved equal. All valves shall have non -rising stems and open left. All valves shall have mechanical joints in accordance with AWWA C110. A two inch, AWWA operating nut shall be provided on all valves. The minimum working pressure shall be 200 psi. The Contractor shall provide manufacturer's certification of satisfactory hydrostatic testing of 400 psi with shut-off test of 200 psi. There shall be zero (0) leakage (bubble tight) at the 200 psi test. Valves to be used in wet tap process and the installer, must be approved by the Engineer prior to installation. VALVE BOXES: Valve boxes are to be installed on all buried valves. The boxes shall be cast iron with a minimum 5-114" diameter and long enough to extend from the valve to finished grade. The boxes shall enclose the operating nut and the stuffing box of the valve. Valve boxes shall not transfer loads into the valve. Covers shall be close felting and dirt fight with the top of the cover flush with the top of the box rim. Covers shall be marked "water" with an arrow indicating the direction of the opening. Valve boxes shall be manufactured by the Mueller Co., or an approved equal Green Mountain Scedal Mix Application Rate (pure live seed lbs. per acre) = 175 % by weight Name 40 Creeping Red Fescue 40 Perennial Ryegrass 20 Kentucky Bluegrass 100 Vi Conservation Mix r "+ # 9 V (, .. fT_1 Application Rate (pure live seed lbs. per acre) = 220 % by weight Name 4 di 35 Red Fescue ,9i `? 25 Tall Fescue 15 Annual Ryegrass 12 Perennial Ryegrass r "j F..7j..ei 10 Kentucky Bluegrass 3 White Clover 100 New Hampshire Slope 44 Mi Application Rate (pure live seed lbs. per acre) = 60 % by weight Name 43 Creeping Red Fescue 33 Perennial Ryegrass 8 Redtop 8 Alsike Clover 8 Birdefoot Trefoil 100 All seed shall not exceed 1% in weed content. A guaranteed statement of composition from the dealer must be submitted to the Engineer for approval and be approved prior to commencing with seeding operations. After the seed has been applied, lawn areas shall be lightly raked to mix seed with the soil and rolled with a light -weight roller to the satisfaction of the Engineer. MULCHING: Within 24 hours of application of fertilizer, lime and seed, the surface ago 00+4f OF V,4j��4i y. 3�+ C ��Na 72��60ppz� NIS PIZZAGALLI BUILDING PARKING 18 17 16 15 14 13 � CONTINUES DUMPSTER AREA _(f) z m� o� m 0 K: � O U3 M rTl 0 \ o I 0 z O o� •.E TO WILLISTON ROAD /� N l 1 oc o m M r z� f No. I Date Revision By of vc'� 1 3-26-14 Change of Use RLM A, o � J D GRENIER NO. 9018 ��SS•��IAS�aG\j IA N = r O W w m C N 2 D N A O C � w r z n0 m rM� A m m Z N v m D U m N 1 "m ( _ Ul D = " O O N X = m Z X rO m x ` EDGE OF CURB DORSET STREET TO KENNEDY DRIVE No PARKING PLAN 372 DORSET LLC. 372 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON P.O. Box 445 Date: 8 - 06 -04 GRENIER Waterbury, VT 05676 Drn By: TJM & RLM TEL (802) 244 - 6413 Scale: 1" = 20' SheetNo:1of1 ENGINEERING,PC FAX (802) 244 -1572 Dwg Name: SITE PLAN R I grenierengineering.com File No: MISC. 166 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this a� day of �adUt , 201�, , a copy of the foregoing public notice for [type of applic# [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) Id -PG 6"I s4rvcow) An ©t/'S+C_4 & 1-7 7j�� e►- 0w1I � i r,-fev�� k -71; t0WO'd-o4f,�-,. �I - Vt- I Dated at [town/city], Vermont, this 22'4 day of ah Va!,:!,, 20 . Printed Name: To ri 6V i 4A U Phone number and email: o e . G 0, Signature: Date: U A IaA It Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 1 Mailing Address; ChxtayLdewCcuMzy Fmerge+,wyshelter 334 Crown Point Road Bridport, Vermont 05734 802-758-6878 Dear Friend, As You and Your Business are amongst the leaders of the South Burlington Community, I'd like to ask you to consider a donation to the Chittenden County Emergency Shelter which will open in South Burlington this Spring on Dorset Street. As the Founder of the Burlington Emergency Shelter in 1982 on North Street in Burlington, and consequently, as the Co -Founder of Shelters in Barre/Montpelier, St. Albans, and Camden, Maine, I've developed programs which have been successful in helping 80% of our homeless guests to Independence or other Residential Programs of help. The Shelters I've begun have opened and operated at a tiny fraction of the cost of government supported Homeless Shelters, and I continue to be committed to neither seeking nor accepting a single Tax Dollar, but opening and operating the Shelter entirely through the Private Donations of Individuals, Churches and Businesses who choose to give. I have been deeply impressed by the Leaders of South Burlington and am convinced our location on Dorset Street is an ideal location for a Shelter which is greatly needed in the face of an estimated 150-200 individuals, still sleeping outside in South Burlington and throughout the area as there are few openings in the Burlington Shelters at the COTS Waystation and ANew Place on North Street (which has evolved into a longer term "transitional shelter" from the BES program I began in 1982.) I have met with City Leaders such as, Doug Benoit, Trevor Whipple, Jim Barlow, Paul Conner, Ray Belair, Tom Hubbard, and David Young. I also was pleased to be invited to, and to present the Shelter to, and answer good questions from, the South Burlington School Board. South Burlington is a Wonderful Community and as it emerges from the Shadow of Burlington in its own right, I greatly admire the attitude of its leaders who show that South Burlington is a community that truly cares about all of it's neighbors. After answering their good questions, I've found nothing but positive support for my effort to provide the Community with a well -run and effective Shelter. With a responsible structure the Shelter will neither draw nor enable people, but compassionately help its guests to address the factors of their homelessness, and reestablish themselves as productive neighbors in our Community. We anticipate a yearly budget of approximately $200,000. Our startup costs, however, include a $30-40,000 Excavation dig into the South Burlington Water Main. We also need a Fire Alarm System, Interior renovations to add showers and additional toilets and the Shelter has great need of a vehicle to conduct business now and to transport our guests once opened. Thank you for your Consideration of our request of a donation to the Chittenden County Emergency Shelter. I'd be very glad to speak with you directly should you desire to learn more about the Shelter or become involved in the renovations needed before our opening, volunteering or contributing toward other needs we have as well. On behalf of the Shelter Board, Thank you for your care and interest in this effort. Sincere) on vs Executive Director Chittenden County Emergency Shelter P.S. Our actual site address is 372 Dorset Street, the old radio station building next to Canoe Imports, owned by Joe Handy. The Bridport mailing address is temporary now during the opening process, as I am without a vehicle and working from my home in Bridport until our early May opening date. ray From: ray Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 9:19 AM To: Jon Svitaysky Oonsvit@yahoo.com) Subject: 372 Dorset Street Group Home Application #SP-15-79 Jon, Upon further review, you will not be required to provide the information described in Section 14.11(B)(2) of the Land Development Regulations. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. Plan Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 01/06/16 Comments Due: ASAP Project Description/Meeting Date: Site plan application #SP-15-79 of Jon Svitarsky to amend a previously approved plan for a 7,020 sq. ft. building used as a radio and television station. The amendment consists of converting the building to a Group Home (community residence) use to house a maximum of 25 residents, 372 Dorset Street. Other Notes: Meeting date is 02/02/16 1 O1/11/2016 �-Lty of South Burlington Grana List Page 1 of 1 08:31 am Parcel Report ray For Parcel: 0570-00372. SISTERS & BROTHERS INVESTMENT GROUP LLP Name SISTERS & BROTHERS INVESTMENT GROUP LLP 75 S WINOOSKI AVE BURLINGTON VT 05401 Location 911 372 DORSET ST Tax Map 26-016-000 Desc. .43A COMM Codes: (1) (Category)C (Equipment) (Owner)C Wood Crop Pasture Other Site Total Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 Real Land Building Equipment Inventory Values: 450,600 161,800 288,800 0 0 Homestead Veterans Farm Stab. L.U. Acres Land Use 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Lease Prev. Eqpm Land Use Amt Prev. Real 0 0.00 0 0.00 450,600 Housesite Special Exmp Grand List 0.00 0.00 4,506.00 Misc: Status: T Bill #: 58928 Updated: 06/09/2015 Last sale was: Valid on 11/20/2014 for $575000 recorded on 1245/129 Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1) Misc Fields: (0): 150110000 (6) : N (7): TIF PARCEL (8) : N (9): 05/30/01 SPAN: 600-188-14477 ray From: Dave Wheeler Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 1:10 PM To: ray; Dan Albrecht Cc: Tom Dipietro; Justin Rabidoux Subject: RE: Planned 4-Unit Development Site & Utilities Plan Ray, The Stormwater Section has reviewed the "372 Dorset LLC" site plan prepared by Grenier Engineering, PC, dated 8/6/04 and most recently updated on 3/26/14. We do not have any comments. I believe that Justin will be sending over comments separately. Thanks, Dave Mk Y - Da -,id P. WheelerA s�tc ant Stofna ater Superinstendeut De astment ,a L 44:�i_%1,z � ' Cir o _vtk D, r z Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 3:25 PM To: ray Subject: Site Plan Application #SP-15-79 - 372 Dorset Street Hello Ray, Below are comments on the site plan for the referenced project based on a drawing prepared by Gernier Engineering, PC, revised on 3-26-14. 1. No utilities are shown on this plan. Based on discussions I've had with CWD, our staff and the applicant, they are proposing to install a new water sprinkler service. Our plans indicate this is a less than straight forward job given the depth and complexity of the adjacent utilities. No plan is provided to show how this work would be accomplished with minimal impact on adjacent city infrastructure. 2. The driveway/parking lot shows a circulation pattern and parking spaces, but it does not contain curb cuts or other markings making it difficult to tell if their design would actually work. Thanks, Justin Rabidoux Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 658-7961 jabidoux@sburl.com www.sburl.com Twitter: twitter.com/sbpubworks Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. if you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. ray From: Craig Lambert Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:37 AM To: ray Cc: Justin Rabidoux Subject: RE: Ray, If they aren't doing any new landscaping, disregard my comments Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clam bert(c)sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: ray Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 3:11 PM To: Craig Lambert <clambert@sburl.com> Cc: Justin Rabidoux <jrabidoux@sburl.com> Subject: RE: Craig, Just so you know, they are not proposing any changes to the existing landscaping. They submitted the exact same plan as was submitted when the building was converted to a radio station, so it looks like they are making some changes. These changes were made years ago. This being the case, do you want to make any changes to your comments? Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitV.com Notice- Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City gff7cial or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return entail. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Craig Lambert Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 3:06 PM To: ray <ray@sburl.com> Cc: Justin Rabidoux <iabidoux@sburl.com> Subject: Ray, I've attached comments for 372 Dorset St landscape Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clam bert(d_)sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. ray From: Bill Bodette <wjbodette@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 10:00 AM To: ray Subject: Re: Abutter Notice - 372 Dorset Street OK, thank you, I'll let them know. Let this be a formal request to withdraw my application. Thank you for your guidance; I could be calling on you in the future when the right building comes along. --Bill From: rgy Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 9:38 AM To: Bill Bodette Subject: RE: Abutter Notice - 372 Dorset Street if you withdraw and they submit a new application, it would not be heard for awhile, we are very busy with lots of DRB applications. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitV.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which nury be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Bill Bodette [mailto:wjbodette@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 9:28 AM To: ray Subject: Re: Abutter Notice - 372 Dorset Street Yes, I am withdrawing my application. If they wish to keep the 5/20 date and send you a new application, should I have them contact you? By when at the latest? From: ray Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 9:04 AM To: Bill Bodette Subject: RE: Abutter Notice - 372 Dorset Street They could keep going. This is your application, so are you withdrawing it? Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 1 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitV.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Bill Bodette [mailto:wibodette@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 8:46 AM To: ray Subject: Re: Abutter Notice - 372 Dorset Street Hi Ray, effective yesterday, I withdrew from the contract at 372 Dorset St. Should the seller wish to apply for a permit change to office use, would they be able to keep the same meeting date of 5/20, and send you an amended application? Or would they need to apply fresh and wait for a future meeting? Thanks —Bill From: ray Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 8:50 AM To: Bill Bodette Subject: Abutter Notice 372 Dorset Street MM Attached, please find a draft agenda for the May 20th DRB meeting and a cover letter for you to mail via regular mail to all the abutting landowners to your project, including those across the street. Please mail these letters by the end of the day on May 9th and then submit a Certificate of Service back to me which you can download at www.sburl.com/permits Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitV.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email Thank you for your cooperation. PJ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 69 t� day of , 201E a copy of the foregoing public notice fof Site Plan [type of application] # SP-14-07 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) AOS Realty LLC 6 San Remo Dr. South Burlington, VT 05403 Church of Christ 15 Elizabeth Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Four Boys LLC 1408 Ferry Rd. Charlotte, VT 05445 Howard National Bank C/O TD Bank 380 Wellington ST Tower B 12th Floor London Ontario, Canada N6A 4s4 Malone Dorset St Properties LLC 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Mitchwartz Properties LLC 329 Dorset St South Burlington, VT 05403 Mitchwartz Properties LLC 329 Dorset St South Burlington, VT 05403 Mitchwartz Properties LLC 20 Hall Road So. Hero, VT 05486 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 South Burlington City Center LLC c/o So. Burlington Realty Co. P.O. Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 University Mall LLC c/o Finard Properties 155 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Dated at (i s > [town/city], Vermont, this day of l ` , 20_L�l. Printed Name: Phone number and email: Signature: Date: William Wilson �1,;2 �Z6 Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 PUNNING & ZONING 1'ermitNumbcrSP-_1- ✓ 7 (oi7icc use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ElAdministrative LZevclopment Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development 1Zeview Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax ##): Dorset Communications LLC _ Ph: (603) 668-6400 288 South River Rd Fax: (603) 668-6470 __ Y Bedford, NH 03110 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): Volume 659 pg 606 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): 372 Dorset LLC 15 Brownell Way, South Burlington, VT 05403 660-2782 (w) 497-0705 (h) 233-2115 (c) 658-5424 (fax) 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Same as applicant (William J. Bodette) 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: wjbodette@gmail.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 372 Dorset St., South Burlington, VT 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0570-00372 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT OS403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com C V. PROJEC'[' DESCR)<i'TION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Changing permitted use from "Radio Station" to "Office" b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Radio Station - 4320 sq' Storage - 2700 sq' c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Offices with storage d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 7020 Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): One story, no basement f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Existing employees - Total 9 (5 office and 4 non -office) Proposed - 3 immediately, and approx. 9 eventually (all office) h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): _ Please note we're looking for an exception on the number of required _ parking spaces. 38% of the sq' of this building is storage area, Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAC3 dotal Parcel 5izc : 1 -' 3U `iq. ht. a. Building: Existing 3/ % / 7020 sq. ft. Proposed _ % / sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 60 % / 11235 sq. ft. Proposed % / _ sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 65 _ % / 12175 sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) N/A * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: $ N/A N/A c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): N/A 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 12:00 p.m. 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Office hours = 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m, 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday-Frid 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: N/A 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I 1" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the si a plan application in accordance with the ci 's fee schedule. /Nff9 07 7 / /7 ��/ �J, Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form, Rev. 12-2011 SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line APR 0 1 pfl, NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. OF A SIGNAT RE OF APPLICANT PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑Administrative Officer I have reviewed t is site plan application and find it to be: Compl The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, crpply,for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 8 79-56 76 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 15, 2007 Pamela Steece, Vice President The Merchants Bank 275 Kennedy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Release of Irrevocable Letter of Credit #1160030225 — Dorset Communications, LLC Dear Ms. Steece: Please be advised that the City of South Burlington hereby releases Dorset Communications, LLC from maintaining the above referenced Letter of Credit. Enclosed is the original Letter of Credit for your records. If you need further information please let me know. Sincerel. , R m 41,.. Belair 19'" Administrative Officer merchants ,, - BANK August 12, 2004 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 572 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Irrevocable Letter of Credit #1160030225 Dorset Communications, LLC Ladies and Gentlemen: We hereby establish our IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT #1160030225 in your favor for the account of Dorset Communications, LLC, 288 South River Road, Bedford, NH 03110 up to the aggregate amount of One Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty and 00/100th U.S. Dollars ($1,650.00) available by your draft(s) on us at sight. Drafts drawn under this credit must be marked, "Drawn under The Merchants Bank, 275 Kennedy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403, LETTER OF CREDIT #1160030225, dated August 12, 2004" and the amount and date of negotiation of each draft must be endorsed on the back hereof by the negotiating bank. This Letter of Credit expires at the close of business on August 12, 2007. Unless otherwise expressly stated, this Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision, International Chamber of Commerce, Paris, France, Publication No. 500) and is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code of Vermont, as from time to time amended We hereby agree with the drawers, endorsers, and bona fide holders of drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Credit, that such drafts will be duly honored on presentation to the drawee if negotiated or presented before the close of business on August 12, 2007. Sincerely, MERCHANTS BANK Pamela P. Steece Vice President V• P.O. Box 1009, Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-658-3400 MEMBER FDIC 7�E�"i'EFt CDIF- CREIDZT AGF2EEMENZ' THIS AGREEMENT,' executed in triplicate between Dorset Communications, LLC , of Montpelier, Vermont , hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER", Merchants Bank _ of South Burlington, Vermont hereinafter referred to as ""Bank", and City of South-Rurlinzton, Vermont , hereinafter referred to as "MUNICIPALITY" W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer has received site plan approval from the MUNICIPALITY'S Planning Commission for the development of property located at 372 Dorset Street, South Burlington-, Isrmonto as depecited on a site plan entitled Is Dorset Communications, LLC 10, dated August 6, 2004 �, and prepared by Charles Grenier Consulting Engineer. P.C. WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete the construction of the development site in accordance with the plan approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish a mechanism to secure the obligations of the DEVELOPER for the work as set forth above, and WHEREAS, the BANK executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of issuer of a Letter of Credit hereinafter specified; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: (see attachment) 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1 no later than October 31, 2004 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within ono year after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1. For Ud/ l._J ZUU4 11: Z1Z t3ejZZZ 71 DZU Mull I I-CL Lar, orllwk__J 1 the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guarantee of DEVELOPER's performance of all requirements hereunder set forth, DEVELOPER hag caused the BANE to issue its Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the MUNICIPALITY, the original of which is attached to the MUNICIPALITY's copy of this Agreement, and a copy of which is attached to the DEVELOPER's copy of this Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall cause the attached Letter of Credit to be renewed at least thirty (30) days before the maturity date thereof. Failure of DEVELOPER to deliver evidence of such renewal to MUNICIPALITY thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration of said Letter of Credit shall constitute a default of the terms of this Agreement. 5. Said Irrevocable Letter of Credit provides that the drafts drawn under said credit, must be accompanied by a written statement signed by a duly authorized agent of the MUNICIPALITY, that in the judgement of the MUNICIPALITY, the DEVELOPER is in default under the terms of this Agreement, and that the funds to be drawn by the draft are in payment for, or in anticipation of payment for materials, labor and services required for completion of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Payment of each draft will be made at sight when presented to the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY, the payment limited only by the aggregate amounts presented in relationship to the maximum amount of the Letter of Credit. If DEVELOPER shall be in default of the Agreement for seven (7) days because of its failure to provide evidence of renewal of the Letter of Credit, required in paragraph 4 above, the MUNICIPALITY shall notify DEVELOPER by certified mail of said default. DEVELOPER shall then within three (3) business days provide MUNICIPALITY with evidence of said renewal of Letter of Credit or MUNICIPALITY may notify BANK of such default and request payment under said Letter of Credit. 6. The DEVELOPER and MUNICIPALITY hereby agree that the sum Of sixrPPn hundred fifty dollars ($ 1,650.00 ) shall be sufficient to secure DEVELOPER's obligations under this Agreement but shall not relieve DEVELOPER from the obligation to pay any additional costs, if actual costs exceed the above -stated cost. 7. The MUNICIPALITY will promptly submit to the DEVELOPER a copy of any draft it submits to the BANK. The consent of the DEVELOPER to payment of said draft by BANK to the MUNICIPALITY under said Letter of Credit shall not be required. 2' VVI 1.:1 i-V UY 11 Ja� UUa:L a_J1 Ja_V I'UJI'IIrGLl GIB; DI�;LI��I rH�JG VY t l 9. The MUNICIPALITY shall not file with the BANK a Statement of Default until ten (10) days after notice has been sent to the DEVELOPER, by certified mail, setting forth its intention to do so. 9. All funds drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used solely by the MUNICIPALITY for the purpose of completing construction of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Any work contracted for by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the MUNICI]PALITY's own work force and equipment, or shall be accomplished in such other manner as in the judgement of the MUNICIPALITY shall accomplish the work more expeditiously and economically. 10. If payments are drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to said Letter of Credit, and it shall later develop that a portion of the monies drawn are in excess of the MUNICIPALITY'S needs, any such excess amount shall be refunded by the MUNICIPALITY to the BANK, to be credited by said BANK to the DEVELOPER. 11. This Agreement and said Letter of Credit shall terminate and shall be of no force and effect upon completion of the one year warranty period as described in the above Paragraph 3. If the MUNICIPALITY has not delivered any written notice to the DEVELOPER of any defective or improper work or materials in the construction of the improvements within the twelve (12) month period, or if notice has been given and the defective work or materials have been corrected by the DEVELOPER, the MUNICIPALITY shall forthwith notify the BANK in writing that the Letter of Credit may be canceled, and shall return the original Letter of Credit to the BANK, and both the DEVELOPER and the BANK shall be released from all obligations hereunder and under said Letter of Credit. 12. The BANK may not modify the Letter of Credit without first receiving written consent of the MUNICIPALITY. 13. DEVELOPER hereby agrees to indemnify and hold BANK harmless from all claims, causes of action or liability of any kind arising out of this Agreement or the issuance by BANK of this Letter of Credit, including attorney's fees, as long as BANK follows the terms and conditions outlined in said Letter of Credit. 14 This Agreement shall be binding on all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. .a rJai 14/ zrjrJ4 11: �.: +�r�.'�1.�1 �tr� MUN i h'LLlth'. BRDc�ST PAGE 05 Dated at� . � ►� ��,' V l� ��'�his da4 of this day of IN THE PRESENCE OF: _ By: Duly Autho� v t (DEVF_I'OP R) Dated at �`� , Vermont, this day of this day of , 20 IN THE PRESENCE OF: By: my Authorized Agent (BANK) Dated at: 1eLi/"% d,Vermont, this day of this day of 20IF -CD-Duty Auth rizcd Agent (MUNICIPALITY) 0 fUU/12/2004 12:06 8022231520 MOHTPELIER BRDCST PAGE 01 CREATIVE LANDSCAPING - LANDSCAPES BY DESIGN - P.O. BOX 147 ^ JERICHO, VT 05465 (e0z) es9-2709 000245 CUSTOMER NAMF�� f C�;^/ S `� �C 0— � �- DATEFLAIV STREET �� /� --WORK PHONE JOB NAMEILOCAT�IOM CITY $.T,(1`TE' ' f— HOME PHOF.IF, J72— I♦ I I r11 /E Dr' ' ♦ i I I � C'rZS�� jl& 66 g I I �' L a OTY. _. MATERIAL SIZE UNIT AMOUNT _ WORK DESCRIPTION ss��, �,�� r�A,� LABOR HHS. PATS AMOUNT 3 ,�A� n�•✓v�r�2k 3` 7 _:.". _,..�.. TOTAL TOTAL MATERIALS �- TOTAL LABOR �s> SUB TOTAL TAX LATE COMPLETED WORK ORDERED P.V _ TOTAL SIGNA.TU RE TOTAL r R9plh9r 4rr,m BLS10 Tnn I)r.pniln0 479Yd, P.O. Scx 2914. Hanfnrf,, CT 051ry1-98ca 'EN. i9G.. Printo I Ir I1.-A. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING a& ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 5, 2004 Bob Diaco Sign -A -Rama 3073 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 372 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Diaco: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, November 9, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy cDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNE14G & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 10, 2004 Bob Diaco Sign -A -Rama 3073 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Review Application #DR-04-10 Dear Mr. Diaco: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 5/4/04 (effective 5/7/04). If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. ,.,REATIVE LANE)SCAr,l..dG - LANDSCAPES BY DESIGN - P.O. BOX 147 , JERICHO, VT 05465 (E302) 899-2709 000245 CUSTOMER NAM, 6 4� (7', crCY t , ATE STREET JZz 6c�vesi-r Sv- WORK PHONE JOB NAME/LOCATION CITY. / TE /t?j, A Pr HOME PHONE C)U7- J'7,7 5 NwAll ?J 1-> CID 7 QTY. MATERIAL SIZE UNIT PRICE AMOUNT WORK DESCRIPTION (6 47t AZ#N�c vAe 1,0'77�1-i- ID ep: �se- 4 V-n c 1 -67✓ /* 0,F,,Ysc YC-jy 26 */7, LABOR HRS.j RATE AMOUNT ,"U c75 i TOTAL TOTAL MATERIALS SUB TOTAL DATE COMPLETED WORN ORDERED B7 TOT-ALI/, TAX SIGNATURE I --- TOTAL'/SZ Reorder— -!-S 10 lne Drawing Board P.O Bcx2944 Hartforc., CT06's- EG'' 939 U S.A. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING'TON DEPAKFMENT OF PLARINING & :BONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 14, 2004 Ed Flanagan 169 River Street Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Flanagan: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the July 20, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Be tsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BARD Cam, 20 JULY2004 Mr. Boucher moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-04-45 of Jane Evans Harrocks subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Sketch Plan Application 4SD-04-44 of Thomas Meeker to resubdivide two lots developed with single family dwellings. The resubdivision consists of transferring 7601 sq. ft. of the lot at 15 Gilbert Street to 21 Gilbert Street: Mr. Meeker said he will retain the apple trees he has planted. He will sell the house adjacent to his with'/4 acre. There will be no fencing. He said he has no subdivision intentions. No issues were raised. 6. Public Hearing: Application #CU-04-06 of Kieren & Jennifer Killeen for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The request is for permission to establish an accessory residential unit, 11 Beacon Street: Mr. Dinklage noted he is a neighbor of the applicant. Members did not feel this was a problem. Mr. Killeen noted they had received approval for this use, but the approval has lapsed. Mr. Belair said there are new rules that will take affect in 2005 and 2011. The Board can continue under the present rules until the regulations change. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Application #CU-04-06 of Kieren & Jennifer Killeen subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed. unanimously. n7. Site Plan Application #SP-04-24 of Dorset Communications to convert a 7020 sq. ft. GFA building from retail use to radio and television studio use, 372 Dorset Street: Mr. Belair noted that a professional landscaper must prepare the landscape plan. Mr. Belair said staff questions whether there is enough room for parking. Mr. Flannagan said they were told there is enough with angled parking. Mr. Belair said 18 spaces would be sufficient. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-04-24 of Dorset Communications subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DIEFARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLI VGTON, VERMONI' 05403 (802) 846-4106 F-AX (802) 846-4101 July 22, 2004 Edward Flanagan 169 River Street Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: Findings of Fact and Decision - #SP-04-24 Dear Mr. Flanagan: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 7/20/04 (effective 7/20/04). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. cerely, c� Betsy Mc onough Administrative Assistant Encl. t CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPAZ;,TMEI N Ti OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH B RLINGTON, VER1V ONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 346-4101 July 16, 2004 Edward Flanagan 169 River Street Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: 372 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Flanagan: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, July 20, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date- July 12, 2004 1drblsitldorset_communications\.siteplan.doc Application received: June 7, 2004 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-04-24 DORSET COMMUNICATION, LLC — 372 DORSET STREET Agenda #7 Meeting date- J ly 20, 2004 Owner/Applicant Dorset Communications, LLC 169 River Street Montpelier, VT Engineer Property Information Charles Grenier Consulting Engineer, P.C. Central District 2 Zoning District P.O. Box 445 Waterbury, VT 05676 Location Ma r�rr r *N rr 'OP.. CITY OF SOUTH BUkLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\dorset communications\siteplan.doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION Dorset Communications, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval of a project to convert a 7,020 square foot building from retail use to radio and television studio use, 372 Dorset Street. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Raymond Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans and have the following comments: ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS The subject property falls within the CD-2 Zoning District. The building is already in existence and meets all of the relevant dimensional standards. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The subject building currently exists, so site planning is not an issue for the proposed project. Pursuant to Table 13-2 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed use requires 2 parking spaces per employee. The applicant has stated that there will be nine (9) employees. Thus, eighteen (18) parking spaces will be required and nineteen (19) are provided. One (1) of these parking spaces is handicapped -accessible. Parking spaces #7-13 shall be angled, similar to parking spaces #1-6. These parking spaces shall be in conformance with Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. 1. The plans shall be revised to show parking spaces #7-13 angled in a similar manner to parking spaces #1-6, prior to site plan approval. 2. The parking layout on the plans shall be revised to comply with the Parking Lot Dimension Standards outlined in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations, prior to site plan approval. 3. Pursuant to Section 13.01(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans shall be revised to depict a bicycle rack, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\dorset communications\siteplan.doc (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The parking spaces on this property currently exist and are located to the rear and side of the subject building. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The height of the subject building is not changing through this proposal. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 4. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The subject building is currently in existence, so this criterion is not applicable to this project. (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The subject building is currently in existence, so this criterion is not applicable to this project. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel there are any opportunities for creating additional access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall 3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\dorset communications\siteplan.doc be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). There are no dumpsters or other solid waste -handling facilities depicted on the plans. 5. Any proposed dumpsters or other solid waste -handling facilities shall be depicted on the plans, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. In addition, any dumpsters or other solid waste - handling facilities shall be adequately screened with opaque fencing. (a) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Pursuant to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project will require a minimum of $1,650 of landscaping. The application stated that no additional landscaping will be provided. 6. The plans shall be revised to indicate that the minimum landscape requirement of $1,650 is being met, prior to site plan approval. This landscape plan shall be prepared by a landscape professional and shall include a planting schedule and budget. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. 7. The plans shall be revised to clearly depict the proposed snow storage areas, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Lighting Any changes to exterior lighting will require review by the Design Review Committee prior to approval by the Development Review Board. 8. Any changes to exterior lighting will require review by the Design Review Committee prior to approval by the Development Review Board. Access/Circulation Access to the subject property proposed via an existing 18' wide curb -cut off of Dorset Street. Neither access nor circulation on the site will be altered through the proposed project. Traffic According to the ITE 7th Edition, the current use on the subject property generates an 4 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\dorset communicationslsiteplan.doc estimated 19.02 P.M. peak hour vehicle trip ends. The proposed use is estimated to generate 12.14 P.M. peak hour vehicle trip ends. Thus, there is no anticipated increase in traffic generation for this property. 9. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Buffington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the proposed project will generate zero (0) additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak -hour. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board continue Site Plan application #SP- 04-24. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Edward Flanagan 6i Permit Number SP- - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) j 7 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) r i- �P_ a'm c:eL a"1a... i \ti{`:" (�'",ar L-) a;i 1)--3 .").JJ� Z '�- 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: >"7. - d� -`> w� �---fr 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) C__ �5 < = C== C"- � `7 Q_ (=- 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existin Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) -� 4 F= r Aa&j �-1 j,�- e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): = i `�' := =� 44 ,ge! 4 g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed - % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed Gac % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing - % Proposed 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ S S r c b) Landscaping: $= - c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): i` b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out):' c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION:e — 7� 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:L C. k _Z _•may 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF MOPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORIT t� Development Review Bo Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomple C ector f 11�lkming & Zoning or Designee gate! EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) o Survey data (distance and acreage) o Contours (existing and finished) o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways o Zoning boundaries o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) o Location of septic tanks (if applicable) o Location of any easements o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard o North arrow o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE New Application $ 60.00* Amendment $ 35.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee 4 } State of Vermont WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules Effective August 16, 2002 Case Number: WW-4-2130 PIN: EJ04-0186 Landowner: Dorset Communications, LLC Address: c/o Heilmann, Ekman & Associat P.O. Box 216 Burlington VT 05402 This project, to convert a pre-existing garage to an office/retail business with a maximum of 7 employees, with no increase to municipal water and wastewater services, located on 372 Dorset Street in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. GENERAL 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Supply Division — telephone (802) 241-3400, Water Quality Division — telephone (802) 241-3770, the Department of Labor & Industry — telephone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 879-2300, the Department of Health — telephone (802) 863-7221, and local officials Rriff to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall not make any changes that would affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location or the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 4. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the water and wastewater disposal systems under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 64 — Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit. 5. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-2130 Dorset Communications, LLC Page 2 WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 6. The project is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 105 gallons of water per day. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of obtaining potable water without prior review and approval. 7. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by connection to the municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 105 gallons of wastewater per day. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of wastewater disposal without prior review and approval. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on June 9, 2004. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By � kM 4�� Dolores M. LaRiviere Assistant Regional Engineer C For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Department of Labor & Industry PIZZAGALLI BUILDING PROJECT PARKING 1c 18 17 16 15 14 CONTINUES I Y I I EXIT I �I I I I J rn t � cn I DUMPSTER cO I O l .. i I „ZEA I I- z J � p O l J N N ZE I G I > Yi � I I i I � 1 O a I cn v� o i ! I SIDEWALK / \ EDGE OF CURB i o T,i WiLLISTON ROAD DORSET STREET TO KENNEDY DRIVE -0 a u� on oy DORSE " COMMUNICATIONS LLC 0 > �� of vF�, PARKING PLAN for 372 DORSET STREET L� �PCHARLES �2a SOUTH BURLINGTON GRENIERMARL GREN No. 3242 DRN BY T.J.M �Fs c''�� UL NG I� r*C ® SCALE 1'=20' AL 'SHEET 1 of 1 P.O. BOX 445, WA" ERBURY, VERMODWG NAM SILVERBOW\P ARKIN G (� 802 244-6413 Phone`' 802 244 1572 Fax FILE NO: MISC. 166 AGENCY OF N . 1RAL RESOURCES (ANR) AND EN' ONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) http://www.al...,tate.vt.us/dec/ead/pa/index.htm / h. www.state.vt.us/envboard/ PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOTAL # OF DEC PERMITS: PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW: RESPONSE DATE: I PENDING APPLICATION #: r� DISTRICT: TOWNRUlPIN _ EZ4 - O t 8V OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: (Name) Carte vn� C S LLL (Name) ; main W � s C• (Address) (Address) i (Town) (State) (Zip) (Town) (State) (Zip) I g6a4- Tele hone (Telephone - Project Name: Based on a written or oral request or information provided by_)561Ct received on a/ a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of 143 acres, located on 31,-1 bc, he project is generally described as: r7 t KC_c SCQ no c Ika+ , / µaX v�p(ac�,cC Prior permits from this office: PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ® I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coordinator or Assistant District Coordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. ❑ Landowner/Agent ❑ Permit Specialist ❑ Other Person 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LANDOWNER/AGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. §6007(C)). (!L7) " Project: Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Municipal Has the landowner subdivided before? ❑ Yes ❑ No When/where: # of lots: AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: ❑ Yes jj�-No Copies sent to Statutory Parties: ❑ Yes )i'No BASIS FOR DECISION: SIGNATURE. DATE: 10-1 ADDRESS: District # Environmental Commission ( District Coordinator Telephone: WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED? Yes ❑ No ,�] Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit (#1 & #2)'" ❑ Notice of Permit Requirements (deferral language ) (12) ❑ Floor Drains (#1.2) ❑ Campgrounds (#3) ❑ Extension of sewer lines #(_5) REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: SIGNATURE: DATE5?5 Y ADDRESS: Dept. of Environmental Conservation �Environmen lstance Division, Permit Specialist Telephone: / ❑ Wastewater Management Division, Telephone: OVER "NOTE: NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES (#) REFER TO PERMIT INFORMATION SHEETS IN THE VERMONT PERMIT HA_N_ DB http://www.anr.state.vt.usldec/permit hb/index.htm A PRELIMINARY, NON -BIN ► DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PL,.MITS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR COMMENCEMENT OF CON TRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3• WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-41-3822) Contact: ❑ Discharge Permits: pretreatment; industrial, municipal (#7_1, 7_2, &_�j ❑ Indirect Discharge Permits (#9 & 9_1) ❑ Residuals Management #U 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888-520-4879) Contact: ❑ Construction/modification of source (#14) ❑ Open Burning #( 18) ❑ Wood Chip Burners (>90 HP) #( 14) ❑ Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation (#14) ❑ Industrial Process Air Emissions (#14) ❑ Diesel Engines (>450 bHP) #( 14) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) (800-823-8500 in VT) Contact: ❑ New Hydrants (#22) ❑ >500' waterline construction (#22) ❑ Community Water System (CWS) ❑ Bottled Water (#20) ❑ Operating permit (#21) ❑ Transient Non -Community water system (TNC) (#21) ❑ Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water systems (NTNC) #21 6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR STORMWATER PERMITS (Hotline 802-241-4320) #6 — 6.5) Contact: Contact: Stephanie Lanphear 802-241-4320 ❑ River Management (241-3770) ❑ Ponds (#32.1) ❑ Construction General Permits >1AC of disturbance (#6.1) ❑ Shoreland Encroachment (241-3777) Steve Hanna (#28) ❑ Stormwater from new development or redevelopment sites (#6.2 & ❑ Wetlands (241-3770) (#29) ❑ Multi -Sector General Permit (MSGP) industrial activities w/ SIC codes (#6.4) ❑ Stream Alteration / Section 401 Water Quality Certification / Stream Crossing Structures (751-0129 / 879-5631 / 786-5906 (#27 & 32) 7. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: ❑ Hazardous Waste Handler site ID (241-3888) (#36) ❑ Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) (133) ❑ Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities drop off (241-3444) (#37,39,40) ❑Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) ElDisposal of inert waste, untreated wood &stumps (241-3444) (141 & 44) ❑ Composting Facilities (241-3444) (#43) ❑ Waste oil burning (241-3888) ❑ Waste transporter permit (#35) ❑ Used septic system components/stone (#41) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: _ ❑ Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.) (241-3451) (#45) ❑ State -funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) (U Contact: SMALL BUSINESS & MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: 10. FISH & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT (802-241-3700) ❑ Nongame & Natural Heritage Program (Threatened & Endangered Species) (#47.4) Judy Mirro/John Daly Contact : ❑ Stream Obstruction Approval (#47.5) 11. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office Contact: ❑ Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) (#49, 50, 50.1, 50.2) ❑ Storage of flammable liquids, explosives ❑ LP Gas Storage ❑ Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers #( 50.2) ❑ Boilers and pressure vessels #( 50.3) 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: ❑ Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors (#51, 51.1, 52, 53, 53.1) ❑ Program for asbestos control & lead certification (#54, 55, 55.1) ❑ Children's camps []Hot Tub Installation & Inspection — Commercial #( 51.1) 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: ❑ Child care facilities (1-800-649-2642 or 802-241-2159) (#57) ❑ Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) (#59) ❑ Nursing Homes (241-2345) (#59) ❑ Assisted Living and Therapeutic Community Residences (241-2345) (#59) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION ❑ Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) (#66) ❑ Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) (#63) ❑ Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) (#61) ❑ Construction within state highway right-of-way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) (#66) Contact: ❑ Junkyards (828-2053) (#62) ❑ Railroad crossings (828-2710) (#64) ❑ Airports and landing strips (828-2833) (165) ❑ Motor vehicle dealer license (828-2067) (#68) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800-675-9873) Contact: ❑ Use/sale of Pesticides (828-3478) (#72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78) ❑ Slaughterhouses, poultry processing (828-2426) (#81) ❑ Milk Processing Facilities (828-3428) (#83, 83.1, 85, 87) ❑ Animal sheltersipet merchant/livestock dealers (828-2421) (#89, 89.1) ❑ Golf Courses (828-3478) (#71) ❑ Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) (#88) ❑ Green Houses/Nurseries (828-3481) (#79) ❑ Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) (#75.1, 80, 16. VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 ❑ VT Building Energy Standards (#47.2) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) ❑ Historic Buildings (#47.1 & 101) ❑ Archeological Sites (#47.1 & 101) 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) ❑ Liquor Licenses (#90) ❑ General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) ❑ Business Registration (#90.1) ❑ Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) (#90.2) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802 828-2551 & 828-5787) ❑income &business taxes (sales, meals/ rooms, etc) (#91, 92, 93, 94, 95. 96) 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2070) ❑ Fuel Taxes; Commercial Vehicle (#69-70) LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. U.S- ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael St., Ste. 205, Essex Jct., VT 05452 (802) 872-2893 (#97, 98, & 99) 24. OTHER: Sections #3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Date: I may be reached at 802-879-5676 Copies have been mailed to: Revised 3/04 State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conervation State Geologist RELAY SERVICES FOR HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>VoiCE 1-800-253-0195 VOICE>TDD May 21, 2004 Dorset Communications, LLC c/o Heilmann, Ekman & Associat P.O. Box 216 Burlington VT 05402 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Telephone: (802) 879-5656 RE: WW-4-2130, conversion of a garage to an office/retail business with a maximum of 7 employees located at 372 Dorset Street in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above referenced project on May 21, 2004, including a fee of $115.00 paid by check #20105. Under the performance standards for this program, we have' a maximum of 30 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 30 in-house days, please contact this office. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. For the Division of Wastewater Management Ernestine Chevrier Regional Office Coordinator cc: City of South Burlington Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury f-'TTY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 18, 2002 Mr. Rick Scott 1519 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design review application #DR-02-04 of Rick Scott, Audio Video Authority. Dear Mr. Scott: Please find enclosed the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board approval on April 2, 2002 in regards to the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement to obtain a sign permit prior to erecting the wall signs. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, w Y Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner Permit Number DR-OL - af REG L IV Lo CITY OF SOUTH, BURL ENTGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW MAR 18 2D92 All information requested on this application must be completed in full. F lure tj wovi�e,t�_requested information either on this application form or on required design plans wil� r�iGu i*licaiion being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): El Design Plan Approval Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fm-1 # IIA-16- /-- 4"7— '-) SW 3) APPLICA1,1T (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) -2-- - 4-0 - ( ,l9 Id eZQ-- 916'd - Y372- J5 Yb3 /1) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailIP9 address, phone and fa;-, 9) /1 M el el 6 71— � 4J 'j1fb,,t 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: S- F- 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can. be obtained at Assessor's Office) �`; c> 10 - i� 0 L - ? -a - C, 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvemeryt,or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. 2- The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBNffSSION: �S I (� I e7-- I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: 0 Director 11 Incomplete & Zoning or Designee IL > 16 Date (L- 9 FWA � I I �11- W, - DESIGN REVIEW The information listed below must be submitted along with an application for design review. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I " x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. DesiM Plan Approval o One or more current photographs of the property showing the present condition. o A site plan of the property in accordance with Section 26.10 of the Zoning Regulations. o Building elevations, drawn to scale, showing all sides of the building including: 21 architectural details ® exterior equipment located on the roof, walls, and ground io building height existing and proposed grading color, type and texture of building material doors siding cornices entablatures roofing material moldings and trim ri window details including panes of glass, dimensions, shutters, lintels and awnings a details (cut sheets) of all proposed exterior lights Sign Desigq Approval o Plans (drawn to scale) and specifications showing the size, dimensions and color of the sign and its various parts, the style of letter, material of which the sign is to be constructed, and method of attachment to the building or in the ground. o Color sketch of the sign and building as they would appear in relation to each other. o Statement as to method of illumination -and intensity of the sign. c Master signage plan containing the following: * an accurate site plan of the property showing the location of buildings, parking lots, driveways and landscaped areas. * computations of the maximums area, number, and height of signs, by sign type (i.e., freestanding, wall, etc.), allowed on the property under the sign ordinance. * computations of the area and height of each sign on the property, both existing sips to remain and proposed new signs. * an accurate indication on the site plan of the proposed location of all signs on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. ® standards for consistency among all signs on -the property (existing and proposed). Ito' K .. 4•. RECEIVED MAR 18 NU City ®t bu. bu► oio,�JL✓C1 �Y PAZ!0 T 11 1 1, I DA' E M ��n irro`iu�iu::a�i�•wt�, NORTH ELEVATION Aluminum sign box with plexiglass faces 45 x 84.375" overall dimensions Backlit sign graphic Black background with red and white letters Identical on North and South faces of building Audio Video Authority Proposed sign age 372 Dorset St South Burlington scale 1/4" = 1' MEMORANDUM l TO: South Burli o e elopment Review Board FROM: Ray Bel al Y inistrative Officer RE: April 2, 2001 genda items DATE: March 29, 2002 4) CONSENT AGENDA A) DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION #DR-02-04 GE RICK SCOTT, 372 DORSET STREET This project consists of approval of a new master signage plan for 372 Dorset Street. The application is for approval to install of two new wall signs. The Design Review Committee reviewed the application at the 3/25/02 meeting. This property is located within the Central District 2 on a parcel bounded by Canoe Imports on the north, Dorset Street to the west, the South Burlington High School on the south, and Pizzagalli Property on the east. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA Freestanding Sign No freestanding sign is proposed. Wall Sian There is no freestanding sign proposed for that property. Therefore, the applicant is allowed 10% of the signable wall area or 56 square feet of signage. The application is for two wall signs: both are 26.36 square feet, one located on the north elevation and one on the south elevation, both within the gables of the building. The total signage area is 52.72 square feet. ADDITIONAL SIGN ORDINANCE CRITERIA Location of Features: The locations of the proposed signs are noted in provided elevations. Color Scheme: The plan calls for black background with red and white lettering. The graphics represent the logo of the business. Lettering or Graphic Style: The lettering for all signs is a block font. April 2, 2002 MEETING Lighting: The signs are interior lit. Staff suggests the interior light should be florescent. Location of Signs on Buildings: The location of each of the wall signs in the gable ends on opposite sides of the building as shown in the illustrations provided. Material: The wall signs are aluminum framed with a plastic face. The sign face material should be an opaque plexiglass to minimize glare. Sign Proportions: The proportions are allowable. Consent: The owner of the property signed the design review application. Existing Signs Not Conforming: None. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to section Five of the Sign Ordinance of this approval is null and void. 3) The plans shall be revised to indicate that the sign face background material will be opaque. 4) Any change to the Master Signage Plan shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. 5) This approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. ,. ' 1 ; , ROAD. _ This project consists of a 107 unit planned residential development consisting of 18 buildings and a five (5) lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive. This project was reviewed for preliminary plat approval on 21 August, 2001 (minutes enclosed). 103 units were approved at preliminary plat. The applicant is now requesting approval for a total of 107 units. 2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March z9, 2002 Mr. Rick Scott Audio Video Authority 15i9 Shelburne Road S. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 372 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Scott: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April z, zooz at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Sincerely, Ral� on J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td Uwe;; 3/25/02 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL Rick Scott, 372 Dorset Street I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of application #DR-02-04 of Rick Scott to install two (2) new wall signs one on the northern elevation 45" x 84.375" and on the southern elevation 45" x 84.375", as depicted on set of plans, page one (1) entitled "Audio Video Authority Proposed Signage 372 Dorset Street South Burlington" prepared by Audio Video Authority, with a stamped date of 3/18/02, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to section Five of the Sign Ordinance o(-- this approval is null and void. 3) The plans shall be revised to indicate that the sign face material will be opaque_ owfipl- 4) Any change to the Master Signage Plan shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. 5) This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. OM JAVa1O A U T H O R I T Y MIMEO INTELLIGEh7 [MEXTAMME , North side proposed signage eeTA So �o e A Now. ty _b. a.: E r. z' a y� 0 DESIGN REVEEW CflMMITTEE 23 JANUARY 2002 PAGE 5 r. Duff moved to approve application MDR-02-02 of Toro Edwards to amend a master signage plan with 1) an additional back to back sign panel (16" x 48") to an existing freestanding sign (26 sq. ft., I V tall), and 2) the addition of a 10" X 120" "DRY CLEANERS" wall sign (inn 10" white plastic letters), as depicted on a three page set of plans, wage onentitled "Mt Air Dorset ST" prepared by Twin State Signs® 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plans submitted for Development Review Board approval shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a. The signage colors shall consist of any of the already existing colors represented on the freestanding sign. b. A border shall be added to the tenants freestanding sign that is consistent with the "Orbit Hair Salon" sign. 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to section five of the Sign Ordinance or this approval is mall and void. 4. Any change to the Master Signage Plan shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. 5. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the applicant's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. Mr. Clark seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Design Review Application #DR 02-03 of Nigel Mucklow to amend a previously approved design review application. This application is for approval of HVAC installation on the roof and elevation design changes consisting of- 1) removal of one door and two windows from the southern elevation, 2) removal of two windows and the addition of a door off the parking lot on the eastern elevation, and 3) replacement of six garage doors with three larger doors and installation of vinyl siding on the northern elevation of the warehouse. The project was last reviewed on June 25, 2001: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE 28 JANUARY 2002 19maw, Mr. Mucklow said they propose to tuck the HVAC system under where the roof comes down so the only place you can see it from is the back parking lot. The unit is 4'x4'. Mr. Mucklow showed pictures of the south side of the building where they propose to remove the door. That end of the building is where the future tenant will be storing expensive electronic equipment and the concern is for security. On the east side, which is now a blank wall, they want to put a door facing north. This is a safety measure for a second exit from the building. The applicant may also put an awning there to attract customers to enter there. The 6 existing garage doors will be replaced with.3 3 larger doors (two of 16 ft. and one 12 ft.). They will also put new siding on to match the rest of the building. They will remove the existing graffiti and generally clean up that side of the building. All trim has been painted green. Mr. Duff suggested not using trim on the garage doors and just painting them to match the siding. Mr. 1\/Iucklow said is too expensive to try to match that color. They will just use white. Members raised the question of landscaping. Mr. Mucklow said they have cleaned up trees between the school and this property. They will ask tenants to use flower boxes again this year. The only place left for landscaping is under the roof where snow would fall on it and destroy shrubbery. When a boundary issue with the neighbor is settled, W Mucklow said the two properties might be able to do some landscaping together. Mr. Boehm felt there should be something on the south side of the building, even a couple of windows (even if they are blocked off from inside). He also wanted to see some plantings near the new door as staff has recommended. Mr. Duff moved to approve design review application #DR-02-03 of Nigel Mucklow to amend a previously approved design review application. This application is for approval of RVACinitallation on the roof and elevation design changes consisting of: 1) removal of one door and two windows from the southern elevation, 2) removal of two windows and the addition of a door off the parking lot on the eastern elevation, and 3) the replacement of six garage doors with three larger doors and installation of vinyl siding on the northern elevation of the warehouse, as depicted on an 11 page document prepared by Nigel Mucklow, with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed renovation is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE 28 7ANUARY 2002 PAGE 7 Of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by tine Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board the site plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a. The site plan shall show the installation of a planting bed adjacent to the eastern elevation of the main building, including a planting plan. b. The site plan shall show revised parking to reflect the addition of a planting bed. c. The site plan shall indicate trash storage Onside building. d. The site plan shall include building .and overall coverage information and calculated parking requirements. 3. The materials and colors used to finish the building will be of lake materials and colors that currently exist on the building. 4. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. The existing floodlights shall be removed or replaced with a downcasting shielded fixture approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning prior to installation. 5. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. 6. Garage door trim to match siding and not be painted green. Mr. dark seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Other Business: Members briefly discussed reorganization. It was noted that three members terms expire in May of this year. Mr. Duff offered to be Chair. The Committee decided to gait to hold elections to see if Mary Benoit was interested in the Chair position. The Committee agreed to meet on Monday, 4 March due to the school vacation. As there was no farther business to Borne before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned. VAF�S�� fsai� dVa YO 1�"3��V i� r1onr_w- y viol.- __. _.. _.._... _.,_.. — ____. __--- --c 0r -SSA a i% 16`..,1'':°cd s s DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 21, 2002 Mr. Nigel Mucklow 2345 Greenbush Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site plan application #SP-02-07 and design review application #DR-02-03 of Nigel Muckow, 372 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Mucklow: Please find enclosed the Findings of Pact and Decision of the Development Review Board approval on March 5, 2002 in regards to the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement to obtain a zoning permit within six (b) months, or this approval is null and void ( by 9/19/2002). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner 1/28/02 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL Nigel Mucklow, 372 Dorset Street I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application #DR-02-03 of Nigel Mucklow to amend a previously approved design review application, on June 25, 2001. This application is for approval of HVAC installation on the roof and elevation design changes consisting of: 1) removal of one (1) door and two (2) windows from the southern elevation, 2) removal of two (2) windows and the addition of a door off the parking lot on the eastern elevation, and 3) the replacement of six (6) garage doors with three (3) larger doors and installation of vinyl siding on the northern elevation of the warehouse, as depicted on a (11) page document, prepared by Nigel Mucklow, with the following stipulations: 1) This recommendation for approval of the proposed renovation is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2) Prior to review by the Development Review Board the site plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The site plan shall show the installation of a planting bed adjacent to the eastern elevation of the main building, including a planting plan. b) The site plan shall show revised parking to reflect the addition of a planting bed. c) The site plan shall indicate trash storage inside building. d) The site plan shall include building and overall coverage information and calculated parking requirements. 3) The materials and colors used to finish the building will be of like materials and colors that currently exist on the building. 4) Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. The existing floodlights shall be removed or replaced with a downcasting shielded fixture approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning prior to installation. 5) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. 6) Garage door trim to match siding, and not be painted green 1/28/02 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL Nigel Mucklow, 372 Dorset Street I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application #DR-02-03 of Nigel Mucklow to amend a previously approved design review application, on June 25, 2001. This application is for approval of HVAC installation on the roof and elevation design changes consisting of: 1) removal of one (1) door and two (2) windows from the southern elevation, 2) removal of two (2) windows and the addition of a door off the parking lot on the eastern elevation, and 3) the replacement of six (6) garage doors with three (3) larger doors and installation of vinyl siding on the northern elevation of the warehouse, as depicted on a (11) page document, prepared by Nigel Mucklow, with the following stipulations: c� L. - 1) This recommendation for approval of the proposed Uffw is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2) Prior to review by the Development Review Board the site plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The site plan shall show the installation of a planting bed adjacent to the eastern elevation of the main building, including a planting plan. b) l it l n shall show�evis�d�arkin to reflc 4 the,�ddition of a planting bed. 'The site plan shall include building and overall coverage information and calculated parking requirements. 3) The materials and colors used to finish the building will be of like materials and colors that currently exist on the building. 4AT 4) Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. The existing floodlights shall be removed or replaced with a downcasting shielded fixture approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning prior to installation. 5) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Design Review , Committee P� w�► �� V-U uml DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO January 8, 2002 MEETING Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 16% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 70.1% (maximum allowed is 70%). Proposed front yard coverage is 29.7% (maximum allowed is 30%). The preliminary plat plan should not exceed 70% overall coverage limitation. ✓ Parking: This project requires a total of 4 parking spaces. Two spaces for office, one for non -office employee, and one accessible parking space. The applicant is providing 11 spaces; two are handicap accessible. A bike rack should be provided as required. f'-V� Traffic: This property is in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 194.5 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The tow vte's or this site is 13.48 calculated from ITE. ' v & e�"' Lighting_ Cut sheets of proposed lighting should be provided at preliminary plat. PAM Dum sters: The location of screened dumpsters should be indicated clearly on the preliminary plat plan. 12) RAGS AND RICHES —SITE PLAN APPLICATION,1700 WILLISTON ROAD This project consists of an amendment to previously approved site plan for an 11,110 square foot retail building. The amendment consists of 1) allowing the use of 10 parking spaces for an off -premise business, and 2) approval to allow two (2) storage trailers. This project located at 1700 Williston Road lies within C1 District. It is bounded on the west by a Chinese restaurant, on the north by Williston Road on the south by Potash Brook and on the east by an auto parts business. Access/circulation: Access is via an existing 25 foot wide curb cut on Williston Road. No change is proposed. Coverage/setbacks: Existing building coverage is 18.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Proposed overall coverage is 56% (maximum allowed is 70%). Existing front yard coverage is 73.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Traffic: There are no proposed changes to affect the traffic on and off this property. Parking: This site requires 61 parking spaces. The site plan shows 51 spaces, 10 of which are proposed for use by Thrifty Car Rental (as shown on plan). This brings the number of available spaces down to 41 parking spaces. This presents a shortfall of 20 spaces or 32%. k offa(L f A bikeKshould be shown on the plan. Lighting_ All lig1ting should be downcasting and shielded. ` 13) TAMARACK SERVICE OF VERMONT—SITE PLAN.1700 WILLISTOZ �1 6 Design Review Committee Memo January 28, 2002 "The design of all sign on a property shall promote a consistency in terms of color, graphic style, lighting, location, material and proportions." "More then three (3) predominate colors is discouraged" The proposed addition to the freestanding sign incorporates another color — yellow —on a sign that has five (5) predominate colors —red, turquoise, light turquoise, black, and white. Staff suggests the applicant choose from the colors already present on the sign. White cut out letters are acceptable for the wall sign. Letteringor Graphic Style: The font on the new freestanding sign incorporates yet another style, but also employs and existing block letter style. Staff feels this is acceptable. The wall sign is acceptable. Lighting_ The plan indicates exterior illumination. Location of Signs on Buildings: The location of the wall sign is in the signable area above the door, and is similar placement as the other signs_ Material: The signs are made of suitable material. Sign Proportions: The proportions are allowable. Consent: The owner of the property signed the design review application. Existing Sims Not Conforming: None 5) Design Review Application #DR-02-03 of Nigel Mucklow —372 Dorset Street This project consists of: 1) locating a HVAC unit on the roof, 2) removing a door and two (2) windows on the southern elevation, 3) adding a door and eliminating two windows from the eastern elevation, and 4) on the north side of the warehouse portion of the building —replace six (6) existing garage doors with three (3) new ones, 372 Dorset Street. This project was reviewed last on June 25, 2001 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 372 Dorset Street lies within the CD2 and Design 2 Districts. It is bounded on the west by Dorset Street, on the south by the South Burlington High School, on the east by Pizzagali property, and on the North by Canoe Imports. 0 Consistent Design: The recommended changes to the property are consistent with the existing design elements on the property. The existing graffiti should be removed or the siding replaced the air conditioning unit removed on the south elevation. The siding needs repairs in other locations on the building as well. North elevation of warehouse Design keview Committee Memo January 28, 2002 Ax js , .South elevation of building The proposed renovation of the warehouse portion of the building is an improvement over what exists. Staff suggests the color of the garage doors be either white or ivory (similar to the siding), with green trim, and as proposed, ivory siding on the remainder of the warehouse space. The applicant made no proposed alterations to the portion of the building with the door and windows. Staff suggests the applicant paint the trim green around the windows and door on the entire buildings. Colors and Textures: The changes to the property should include existing materials (the same siding -color, texture, and manufacturer same trim paint color as on the fagade of the buildings), as mentioned above. T East elevation Windows & Doors: The proposed removal of the windows and doors from the building is not encouraged, but the applicant has stated the exterior changes relates to the interior organization of the building. The proposed addition of a door on the east elevation should be similar in construction to the existing door. Roof as a Design Element: No proposed changes to the roof outside of the addition of HVAC on the roof. Staff addresses this under Conceal Rooftop Devices. 7 Design Review Committee Memo January 28, 2002 Orient Buildings to Public Streets: Currently this property is inconsistent with Section 24.40 (g) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. "The primary entrance to buildings shall be designed as such and shall be oriented directly on the public street rather than facing parking lots", and "... for existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate building better to the public street." The addition of a door, stepped back into the fagade or a false door will improve the connection to the public street. A stepped back door allows for access from Dorset Street and will not interfere with the safety of pedestrians on the sidewalk The proposed location of a new door is off the parking lot. This is inconsistent with Section 24.40 (g) of the zoning regulations. Conceal Rooftop Devices: The parapet roof of the north elevation will hide the proposed HVAC. The pitched roof will hide the proposed HVAC from Dorset Street. The existing trees will hide the view of the proposed HVAC from the south. The only view is from the rear of the parking lot on the east. Staff finds this acceptable. Landscape and Plantings_None proposed. However, Staff suggests the installation of planting bed adjacent to the proposed door on the east elevation in an effort to break up the proposed large blank wall. Efficient and Effective Circulation: Outdoor Lighting: No proposed changes to the existing lighting. Special Features: None proposed. Di T1A1RT)'v9 1T fl]F iP?C� `Ti,-T3 , CT 0 ZOl'��T� 575 DORSET STREET SOU HI BURLLNGTOT, VERMONT 05403 (302) 546-4103 FAY, (802) 346-4101 Permit NLtrnber SP- C: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application rust be completed in lull. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site pian xiil result in your application being rejected and a delay in the rvAew before the Development review Board. 1) Obi NER OF RECORD (1i Tame as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) C CIAAkO T I / L V f 1]<�7 1il i A"� (11;4 r .1J tl, <; 2) LOCAT107N OF BAST RECORDED DEED (Boob and page # 3) APPLTCANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) S "J ✓K 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 5) PRO,TEC-1T STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL M # (can be obtained. at Assessor's Office) O S 7 0 — 0 0 j -� I — C 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a.) Existing Uses on / Pro erty (including description and size of each separate use I� b) Proposed Uses on properly (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) uDlu /v�)i�?ly c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 00 d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) I e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain). f'i Nu1' ber of emploVees ,cam company Vehlrles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -ounce employees) g) OtLner (list any ether =Ormaaon pern."ent m this Licatibn net srecrEcaih, requested acove, please note ZOveriay Dissmcts are appiicabie): 3) LOT CON AGE a) Building- Existmg__3& _ % Proposed- 111/0 b) Overall building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed 11/0 c) Front yard. (along each street) Existing I _tt_ I G,/o Proposed"" 9- -0/6 '9r) COST ESTIMATES all BuUding (including interior renovations)- 1b) Landscaping: 0 t) 0 Other site improvements (please list -with cost): 10) ESTUVIATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traf'-fic for entire property (in and out): b) A.11N.J. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hourfor entire property (In and out):_ F) 11) PE�-KHOUR.SOFOPER-A---T7ION- 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTEVIA= PIROJECT COMPLE701,4 DATE 14) STITE PLAN AND IFEE N 0 f4� N 0 r. 16, 9ac.✓t z 3 Lr- A site plan shad bbe submitted -,;Vnich shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular- sizze cc -pies and one reduced copy (11 " 7,,17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan aupficati on feQ 7,hafl, be paid to the Cfty at the time of submitting the site ,:;Ian application (s= E--rhbit A). hereby certify that all the information requested as ;cart of this application has been submitted and is accizate to the best of my knowledge. NL4� - SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT N �,_, SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY 0WINTER. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBI\/HSSION REVIEW AJ'3'I ORITY: "'* Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & .Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete GL & Zoning or Designed CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 28, 2002 Mr. Nigel Mucklow Z345 Greenbush Road Charlotte, Vermont 05445 Re: 372 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Mucklow: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, March 5, zooz at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Sincerely, J oi�id m Ray J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td To: Applicants From: Stephanie Smith, City of South Burlington RE: Project Staff Notes Date: 19 February 2002 Re: Design review application #DR-02-03and site plan application of Nigel Mucklow, 372 Dorset Street. Overview: Site plan and design review application of Nigel Mucklow to make parking layout and landscape changes, as well as elevation changes. Issues: ■ The parking requirement for this site is based on total retail floor area, 1470 square feet. The site needs one space for each 150 square feet. The parking requirement is ten (10) parking spaces. The applicant shows 20. ■ The plan shows angled spaces on a two way drive. This is not acceptable. These spaces should be 90' to accommodate traffic traveling in both directions. (please refer to exhibit 26A for parking dimensions. ■ The other 60 ° angled parking adjacent to the building is not a sufficient length. These spaces require stall depth of 19.8 feet with an aisle width of 15 feet. ■ The bike rack is too close to the easterly entrance and should be relocated. ■ The H.C. space is located in a hazardous location and should be relocated. It should also be 13 feet in width, 8 feet for parking and a 5 foot for a striped access aisle. The applicant can consider a H. C. space in one of the angled spaces (see note on site plan). ■ The applicant has sited planting boxes on the site plan. As staff sees it the intention of the planting beds are to provide an area of permanent plant materials to hide the large blank wall. Staff is afraid the proposed planter boxes will over time become trash receptacles or be removed. In the recommended conditions of the DRC as read, was o "The site plan shall show the installation of a PLANTING BED adjacent to the eastern elevation of the main building, including a PLANTING PLAN." It does not say plant bed or plant boxes. Staff requests the site plan be revised to show a planting bed. If the applicant so desires he can make a case for the proposed plant boxes to the Development Review Board. Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted sufficient information for Development Review Board to consider the applications with the above exceptions noted. Please provide additional information by February 26, 2002. Recommendation: Staff recommends this application be authorized to proceed for consideration at the March 5, 2002 Development Review Board meeting. 575 Dorset Street Phone: 846-4106 Fax: 846-4101 Fax To: Nigel Mucklow From: Stephanie A. Smith Fax:�Date: February 20, 2002 Phone: Pages: 2 Re: DR-02-03 and SP-02-07 CC: Re: Site plan and design review application of Nigel Mucklow, 372 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Mucklow: Please find attached the preliminary comments on the above referenced application. The project is currently scheduled to be considered by the Development Review Board on March 5, 2002. If you wish to respond to these comments or submit additional information, please do so no later than February 26, 2002. Please be sure that someone is at this meeting to represent your application. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, - 7v"—( Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner City of South Burlington, Planning & Zoning 1 Permit dumber DR- O Z a O 3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application .must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on rewired design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) .Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): X Design Plan Approval Sign Design Approval OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fags #)J30), 6'50.> G ( -1-ON' le 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) AS A go -IC 4) CONTACT PERSON (Larne, mailing address, phone and fax #) AS A -Go If 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3-7'Z- Pv R,t v-i- � i s �> %.. a L. DS 4 C73 6) TAX PARCEL, ID # (can. be obtained at Assessor's Office) U Sib -- 06332. C 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement. or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. �) LOB A-t 5y steno o Yv B4?o r— (�i L M 1N Pr�j>r� IUDOrZ X -Two NNI40oWS ot-4 sayTlj i)nC APR payt BAST S 02' IZ-LImiN Ar1ig- ►K6 Wlt4poWr n ON \1VA P C fln3 (C, t, i109 W S i pce IZQ;' LA C9 G Gres -A cis Dib!L j w a i 14 3 NQew 0(40 ANo RESIW� EJU-41 W 04 Stir A6 MAID gJAIL D 114t, The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Fine (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. S , WATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF LAND/BUILDING OWINTER Igo not write below this line DATE OF SUI31VIISSION: I ry I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: Comp ete ❑ Incomplete /I1� '1'- Director of Manning & ,honing or Designee 1) LOCATING HVAC SYSTEM ON ROOF The HVAC systems will be placed on the flat portion of the roof From Dorset Street, the HVAC systems will be hidden. Approaching the building from the south side, the existing trees and angle of the front part of the roof obscure the systems. From the front of the building, the systems are totally hidden. From the north, a 4' false facade hides the units. The only place to clearly see the units would be from the very back of the parking lot. 2) ELIMINATING DOOR AND 2 WINDOWS ON SOUTH SIDE. The two windows do not exist at present. The door has never been utilized because of its distance from the parking lot. The idea of removing the windows and door is for security purposes. 3) ADD DOOR TO EAST SIDE AND ELIMINATE TWO WINDOWS The two windows that exist have been blocked for 20 years by display in the building. This will be the case again. The new door is added for safety and convenience reasons. 4) WAREHOUSE/GARAGE DOORS REPLACEMENT This portion of the building is unattractive and not very functional. The idea of reducing the number of garage doors improves the appearance of the structure. j s® - -- WEST ELEVATION 4 No Text 3'7Z Do(.S1—:� r sT Kt9 1 I %- V%" ► .1 e1.AC.%r. MU%44 1►1/AriEN rrS ROOF I' sciter4 Do R. CgH01'Y ooR FULLRow WEATRRSEAE F R E E LIFETIME FULL BOTTOM 9.83 CFO FREE LIMITED WEATHERSEAL R-VALUE CONSTRUCTION WARRANTY W� = ■t iw-, I " I I - Si H p \jA E C,7=- -,Ili' 1i 3= PLAIN T'he following information naust be shoes on the site plan. Please submit Eve (5) copies and one reduced copy (11 " ,, 1 ?") of the site playa. Failure to provide the following information wig result in your application being rejected and a dewy in the review Lefore the Development Review Board. • Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) o Survey data (distance and acreage) o Contours (e�dstmg and wished) o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in ;`section 26.105 of the zoning regulations o Location of streets; .abutting properties, Fire hydrants, existing buiidings, existing landscaping o Existing and proposed :calrb cuts, pavement, ;walesways o Zoning boundaries o Number ,and location of panning spaces (as required under Section 25.25 of the .zoning regulations) 0 Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) ,of the zoning regulations) o Location of septic tanks (if applicable) o Location of any easements o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, totat lot, and front ;card a North arrow o Name of persona or f= preparing site plan and date o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded.. o Dumpster locations. (durnpsters must be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section. 25.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If Restaurant is proposed, progride number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing wed. seats APPLICATION FEE 17 New Application $ 50.00'N 11 Amendment $ 35.00* ;ncludes $10.00 recording fee 4-173-, ell^le 1 1 3 c�--zF7- 7-77-1 j4n:-A7701Yj a11077,1 /Yo, -=7-/0,Y ea�4rloll 10 21; -Z Mv d 73 Col-v�7 )VE & 'T (T) SIR (T) .55 777' -:x5 c--/ 27 /09.0,) -62 'Ir - S7- 100,,50.pT lye-sll 1::5-Y -,/0, c,:r- Alc✓l 145* o v (2E "l. MAT 0.- 5Z - 7V C-,elT INSTALL MAINT. (P) DORSET LAND CO. INC. DRIVE 55 7 127.77 9 28-RT. SIR (T) F it P 129.27 29'R 2) Ma? - luu X1/� -� SR (T) 'DRIVE (T 7Z 30'RT. 1 126-77 29-27 49-RT. 49-RT. /6 -GLUTTEN NIGEL MUCKLOW HY-COMPANY'- )L RANDALL G. MUNSON d SO. BURLINGTON REAL] /Yo 7,;--, /Yo ,OJT /0'z-00- /9 Cn-9r!C -or 0-coa/- 46•11 4116- -07 00- tT p M7,6 t t lr -5X: e e-; I,;!: > 9 S4-7- 129 24 2/CN7 0,90 crry S F r -Pt I-d ® IN -1"1 On1hV -OD 1-1 yS1xin ft71Vw o.L 9N1 crt .w4^ '3 2 -1 -1 1 M s-JQ® d R i 04$ d S.)V4P-v6,v.j-v V Permit Number DR M NY 0 3 2W cOF SOUTH BURLINGTON ' of So. Burl- ir,541CATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW IL All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): X' Design Plan Approval El Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax ff) NI&C-L MVt&Ki,-V14 ��5 �P �302. 425 tt 65e C .,4 6 S ° 616 c, 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax AS A PoVi�' 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Ar S A r5 c, Q 1-6 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ,5�01 0540 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0 S —4- 0 — o 0 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. IN5TALLit-J& N--k=v-4 R E 9 A 1 -4 1) t-4 is 1Z ( /V\ Co ramT I r� Q i V-4 CT- \J) rlf-f L- <-:. 1� 114 6- Ok WE:51 513>C 0 f- 411 LP) T"4 C, The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sip details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIG TURE OF APPLICANT 0t ON 1311111111 [WEA 1101 Do not write below this line I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ,E] Complete El Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date DESIGN REVIEW The information listed below must be submitted along with an application for design review. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I l" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. .Design Plan Approval o One or more current photographs of the property showing the present condition. o A site plan of the property in accordance with Section 26.10 of the Zoning Regulations. %/ o Building elevations, drawn to scale, showing all sides of the building including: 0 architectural details ® exterior equipment located on the roof, walls, and ground ® building height existing and proposed grading color, type and texture of building material. doors siding cornices entablatures ® roofing material ® moldings and trim window details including panes of glass, dimensions, shutters, lintels and awnings details (cut sheets) of all proposed exterior lights Sign Design Approval o flans (drawn to scale) and specifications showing the size, dimensions and color of the sign and its various parts, the style of letter, material of which the sign is to be constructed, and method of attachment to the building or in the ground. o Color sketch of the sign and building as they would appear in relation to each other. o Statement as to method of illumination and intensity of the sign. o Master signage plan containing the following: ® an accurate site plan of the prope showing the location of buildings, parking lots, driveways and landscaped areas. computations of the maximum area, n er, and height of signs, by sign type (i.e., freestanding, wall, etc.), allowed on the property under the sign ordinance. computations of the area and height of each sign on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. an accurate indication on the site plan of the propo�d location of all signs on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed xw signs. standards for consistency among all signs on the property (existing and proposed). No Text DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO February 19, 2002 MEETING Will not detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public streets and walkways; and ® Will allow retention of additional green space that will enhance the appearance of the developed property. Applicant should be prepared to address these criteria. Sewer: The applicant should request sewer allocation at preliminary/final plat. I,andscaW: A landscape plan should be submitted with final plat. Staff suggests that the circular drive at the entrance to the building be landscaped in the center. A 24 foot wide lane should be maintained, the remainder, in the center, could be landscaped. Other: The property line between lots # 1 and #5 is not complete, it appears to end about eight (8) feet from the rear property line. g) NIGEI, MUCKLOW--SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION- 372 DORSET STREET This project consists of 1) locating a HVAC unit on the roof, 2) removing a door and two (2) windows on the southern elevation, 3) adding a door and eliminating two windows from the eastern elevation, and 4) on the north side of the warehouse portion of the building — replace six (6) existing garage doors with three (3) new ones. This project was reviewed last on June 25, 2001 (minutes enclosed). The initial application was for design review only. The changes in access to the warehouse portion of the building resulted in parking changes. This necessitated the site plan review. This property located at 372 Dorset Street lies within the CD2 and Design 2 Districts. It is bounded on the west by Dorset Street, on the south by the South Burlington. High School, on the east by Pizzagali property, and on the North by Canoe Imports. Consistent Desi The recommended changes to the property are consistent with the existing design elements on the property. The existing graffiti should be removed or the siding replaced and the air conditioning unit removed on the south elevation. The siding needs repairs in other locations on the building as well. Southern elevation 7 February 19, 2002 ME, ETIlG The proposed renovation of the warehouse building is an improvement over what exists. Staff suggests the color of the garage doors be either white or ivory (similar to the siding), and ivory siding on the remainder of the warehouse space as proposed. The picture window remains on this elevation, but proposed is replacement of the door and smaller window with a garage door. North elevation Colors and Textures: The changes to the property should include existing materials (the same siding -color, texture, and manufacturer, same trim paint color as on the fagade of the building), as mentioned above. xa�k ,yr vwi w 7? Windows & Doors: The proposed removal of the windows and doors from the building is not encouraged, but the applicant has stated the exterior changes relates to the interior organization of the building. The applicant proposed the addition of a door on the east elevation and the elimination of two (2) windows. The DRC recommended if the windows were to be removed then a planting bed should be created to break up the mass of the wall. The applicant is now proposing he install one window on this elevation, instead of the recommended condition of a planting bed. Staff suggests that both windows be installed as previously approved to break up what could be a large blank wall. Roof as a Design Element: No proposed changes to the roof outside of the addition of HVAC on the roof. Staff addresses this under Conceal Rooftop Devices. Orient Buildings to Public Streets: Currently this property is inconsistent with Section 24.40 (g) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. "The primary entrance to buildings shall be designed as such and shall be oriented directly on the public street rather than facing parking lots", and "... for existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate building better to the public street." 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO February 19, 2002 MEETING The addition of a door, stepped back into the fagade or a false door will improve the connection to the public street. A stepped back door allows for access from Dorset Street and will not interfere with the safety of pedestrians on the sidewalk The proposed location of a new door is off the parking lot. Conceal Rooftop Devices: The parapet roof of the north elevation will hide the proposed HVAC. The pitched roof will hide the proposed HVAC from Dorset Street. The existing trees will hide the view of the proposed HVAC from the south. The only view is from the rear of the parking lot on the east. Staff finds this acceptable. Landscape and Plantings: None proposed. Efficient and Effective Circulation: Staff finds this acceptable. Outdoor Lighting: No proposed changes to the existing lighting. Special Features: None proposed. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: 1) This recommendation for approval of the proposed renovation is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2) Prior to review by the Development Review Board the site plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The site plan shall show the installation of a planting bed adjacent to the eastern elevation of the main building, including a planting plan. b) The site plan shall show revised parking to reflect the addition of a planting bed. c) The site plan shall indicate trash storage inside building. d) The site plan shall include building and overall coverage information and calculated parking requirements. 3) The materials and colors used to finish the building will be of like materials and colors that currently exist on the building. 4) Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 5) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. The issue the Board should address is the east elevation of the building. The original Design Review application was to remove to previously approved windows from this elevation. If the windows indeed needed to be removed to accommodate the change of 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO February 119, 2002 MEETING use,the DRC recommended a planting bed adjacent to this wall to break up the mass. The applicant is now proposing to install a single window on this elevation to break up the mass. Staff suggests that the Board require the installation of two previously approved windows to break up the mass of blank wall. SITE PLAN CRITERIA: The only issue affecting this application is parking. Parking: The parking requirement is ten (10) spaces. The plan shows ten (10) spaces, one is handicap accessible. Staff suggests the applicant relocate the bike rack. Currently it is too close to the rear entrance for either to be functional. 9) PAUL MORWOOD—DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION-333 I)DORSET STREET This project is a request to replace wood clapboards with vinyl siding on a 1220 square foot building used as a general office. This property located at 333 Dorset Street lies within the C1 and CD3 Districts. It is bounded on the north by a small residence converted to office use (doctor's office), on the east by Dorset Street and Dorset Street Beverage, on the south by another small residence converted to office use (insurance company), and on the west by residences on Sherry Road. Consistent Design: The vinyl siding proposed relates to the buildings adjacent to the applicants property (photos included). Materials Used: Proposed vinyl siding has a faux wood grain finish. It is not an obvious faux texture and staff finds it suitable. A letter is enclosed with information on the company doing the installation. Colors and Textures: The proposed vinyl siding is a subdued color choice and is a complimentary color choice to the existing freestanding wood sign. The texture of the siding has a faux wood grain, which is acceptable. Windows & Doors: No proposed changes. Human Scale Design: No changes proposed to affect the human scale. Roof as a Desi n1Element: No proposed changes. Orient Buildings to Public Streets: No changes proposed to effect the orientation to the public street. The building currently has a front door that opens to Dorset Street. Conceal Rooftop Devices: No rooftop devices proposed. 10 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 29, 2001 Mr. Nigel Mucklow 2345 Greenbush Road Charlotte, Vermont 05445 Re: Design Review Application Dear Mr. Mucklow: Enclosed please find a copy of the June 25, 2001 Design Review Committee meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Associate Planner Enclosure td 3,+2. boesOE7 si ---16 Op C> O o LS W i t- L K C- C e r4 -T-v 9-cp \rimyk- 4 ►o inch -rc) NAM,14 >-xIsT i"of Rar&-n rrrir- NI 0 P,7 )} 215, 2CGI Design Committee Present 17Dor-na Leban, Frank Clark, David Boehm Otlft�,--rs: N igel Mucklow, Charles Deslauriers, Mack 'Leeson, Steve Gaydos, M, i Beth Hoover, Director of Planning & Zoning. Call to order: 7:35 P.NL 1. MlhiuTes of April 10, 2001 and May 14, 2001 - NIs. Leban made a motion to approve. Mr. Clark seconded and the minutes were approved unanimous. 2. Other 'business - Annual appointments need to occur at July meeting. '2 Street DR-0 1 -05 Mucklow - IA/Ir. IMucklo-"Af asked whether a door on Dorset 'tie- t eras required. He said a door opening into sidewalk would be dangerous. 1�4r- A/Iuck -Iovkr stated that South Burlington Council & Vtrans wanted the door removed in 1990. Mr. TVIucklow submitted standards which require stipulate out -swinging doors. Mr. Mucklow says with door 20" from sidewalk, outs wing is dangerous. Ms. Hooverasked if interior renovations were completed. Mr. Mucidow sLed one door was removed and two were .Installed. iMs. H, oover stated there were no ongoing requirements pursuant to agreement. -Mr. Mucklow showed he was paid and told to move doors; he followed instructions. I\/Ir. Mucklow showed proposed west elevation with over 6 windows. Mr. Boehm stated that it seemed inappropriate to require moving entrance; iA/Sz-. Clark agreed. Ms. Leban stated that there seemed to be extenuating circumstances. Mr . Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend anprova I of the design review application #DR-0 1 -05 of Nigel Mucklow to: I acid t2lree windows and a sign panel to the north facade, 2) remove the cast stone siding, the cur -rent window and door bays, and chimney stack from the west facade, 3) introduce a center side gable to the west facade with three six over six pane windows underneath framed on the facade of the building by vvccden pilaster strips and flanked on each side by three window bays each. With c-ne six over six pane window, and 4) reconfigure the three western mc-,sr, bays on the south facade, 372 Dorset Street., as depicted on a ten (10) page set of plans, page one entitled 11372 Dorset St.", with a stamped received date of 5/3/01 with the followi--m stipulations: gaze #2 1. This recommendation for approvaf of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 2' of South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of 4 hether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Adm-Inlistrative Officer. 9-n n a 2. The proposed structure shall utilize a high quality vi 71 that -does not -use a sirnulated grain. 3. A.11 graffiti shall be -removed from the exterior of the building. 4. For the purposes of zoning and subdivision, this property shall not be exempted frorn . resign Review associated with air conditioner units, new gas, electric, phone meters, or ,other utilities ities on the exterior of the building. b4s. Leban seconded and the motion passed unanimousi7. 4. DR--,,01-07 Desiauriers —Mr. Deslauriers presented photographs of existing buill, din, I gg showing location of stacks viewed when driving north on Dorset Street. Three vent stacks are at issue. Mr. Deslauriers, stated that he didn't realize -the original approval required painting stacks; stacks are PVC which come hi white or black. A/Ir. Deslauriers painted galvanized ones dark green. He statcd that he could not get the PVC pipes painted for less than $850-00. 7he original approval dealt with PVC stacks as well as galvanized. I A/L ,% Clark moved that -the City Center Design Review Committee recomm end approval of design review application #]DR-01-07 of Charles T' ,eslauriers to amend the final plat of a previously approved planned unit devellopnient consisting of a 184 unit congregate -housing facility and a 104 unit xtended stay hotel in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of leaving c the veal stacks white, 415 Dorset Street, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "Hawthorne Suites Phase H", prepared by Damian Turner, dated 3/14/00 with a stamped received date of 11/21/00, with the iollowing stipulations: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 10 JULY 2001 PAGE 2 c. Design Review Application #DR-01-08 of Teeson Real Estate to replace an internally illuminated freestanding sign with an externally illuminated freestanding sign that consists of two sign panels. Sign panel one is two fee by four feet in dimension and employs a green background with white lettering reading "Teeson Real Estate." Sign panel two is two foot by four foot in dimension and employs a white background with red lettering reading "Foulsham Farms Real Estate," 365 Dorset Street. d. Design Review Application #DR-01-09 of Dorset Square Associates to amend a previously approved 54,480 sq. ft. shopping center with four buildings. The amendment consists of installing a door and window on the north fagade of the southern wing of the main building, 150 Dorset St. No issues were raised on the Consent Agenda. Mr. Farley moved to approve the Consent Agenda subject to the stipulations in the Administrator's memo of 6 July. Mr. Cameron seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-01-34 of Daniel & Lee O'Brien, DBA Forest Park Realty Corp. and The O'Brien Family Limited Partnership for a 101 unit planned residential development and a six lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive: Mr. Dinklage noted that the Board received a letter from Tom Crowley, President of Georgetown Homeowners' Association indicating that they had agreed on a chain link fence. A letter was also received from Mark Hall representing Wellesley Condominium Association asking for time to do a traffic study and stormwater survey. The Board also received a traffic study done by the applicant. Patrick O'Brien then presented the plan. He said the proposal is to subdivide the property into 6 lots. Lot #1 would be 8.1 acres and would contain the Stonington Circle town homes. Lot #2 would be 5.3 acres and would consist of the Lancaster Lane apartment buildings. Lots 3 & 4 would remain open and would be given to the city for recreation purposes. The remaining parcels would be left in their natural state. Mr. O'Brien indicated a future potential connection to Old Farm Road. Mr. Belair noted this is on the official city map. Mr. O'Brien noted that the maximum allowable density is 111. They propose 101 units. The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 10 July 2001, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; E. Schmitt, L. Rupferman, M. Boucher, R. Farley, J. Cameron Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; J. & N. Moreland, C. Wright, L., D. & P. O'Brien, Q. Wang, M. B. & F. Maher, M. Dugan, M. Brown, C. Barnard, P. Lilienthal, M. Von Ohlsen, M. Gorarum, S. Deacon, M. Burke, F. Hiltz, R. Dickinson, C. Deslauriers, B. Marcellino, W. Nedde III, J. Robert, R. Rushford, J. Reitman, M. Young, M. Swanson, W. & C. Hooper, G. Gerdes, G. Stevenson, C. Rotax, L. Yankowski, R. Guthrie, B. Cerasoli, D. Weaver, J. Wulfson, S. McClellan, P. Heald, G. Sporzynski, D. Marshall, T. Boyle 1. Other Business: Mr. Dinklage noted receipt of a copy of a soil survey in connection with the Marceau Meadows development. This will be filed in the Zoning Administrator's office. 2. minutes of 19 June: Mr. Boucher moved to approve the Minutes of 19 June as written. Mr. Schmitt secondec'..: Motion passed unanimously. / 3. Consent Agenda: a. Design Review Application #DR-01-05 of Nigel Mucklow to: 1) add three windows and a sign panel to the north fagade, 2) remove the cast stone siding, the current window and door bays, and chimney stack from the west faVade, 3) introduce a center side gable to the west faVade with three six over six pane windows underneath framed on the facade of the building by wooden pilaster strips and flanked on each side by three window bays each with one six over six pane window, and 4) reconfigure the three western most bays on the south fagade, 372 Dorset Street. b. Design Review application #DR-01-07 of Charles Deslauriers to amend the final plat of a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 184 unit congregate housing facility and a 104 unit extended stay hotel in two buildings. The amendment consists of leaving the vent stacks white, 415 Dorset St. 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 25 2001 Nigel Mucklow 2345 Greenbush Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Design review Application, 372 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Mucklow: Enclosed please find a copy of the minutes and Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on July 10, 2001 (effective date July 24, 2001). Please note the conditions of approval, including that a Zoning Permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval will be null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincere, Sarah,MacCallum Associate Planner Enclosure : 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 2, 2001 Mr. Nigel Mucklow 2,545 Greenbush Road Charlotte, Vermont 05445 Re: Design Review Application Tear 1\/L-. -Mucklow: Enclosed please find a copy of the May 14, 2001 Design Review Committee meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Say IVLcCallum Associate Planner Enclosure td CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 The South Burlington Development Design Review Committee held a regular meeting on Tuesday, May 14, 2001 at 7:35 P.M. in the City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: Timothy Duff, Mary Benoit, Donna Leban Others: Sarah MacCallum, Associate Plar ---: I''ayne Gibson of Kershner Signs, John Jaeger of South Burlington Realty, Nigel Mucklow, Mostafa Daovdi, Greg Rabideau and Margo Breen Minutes of April 10, 2001: Tabled 2. Sign Design, 340 Dorset Street Mr. Gibson introduced the application. He stated that it was the wish of the applicant to move toward 40" by 70" wooden oval signs that were painted. Mr. Duff stated that he didn't have a problem with the application. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve the design review application 4DR-01-03 of John Kennedy to amend a previously approved master signage plan. The amendment consists of 1) removing one 16 inches by 3 foot wall sign totaling four square feet, and 2) erecting one 40 inches by 70 inches non -illuminated wall sign, 340 Dorset Street, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "Master Signage Plan for 338,339, and 340 Dorset Street", dated April 4, 2001 with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 ofthe South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. 3. Prior to review by the Development Review rioard, the applicant should revise the master signage plan to: a) Remove all reference to exterior lighting of the MacSphere and Caswell Credit Union signs. b) Remove 339 Dorset Street from the title of the Master Signage Plan. 4. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to Section Five of the Sign Ordinance or this approval is null and void. 5. Any change to the master signage plans shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee and approved by the Development Review Board excepting design review applications made for erection of freestanding sign panels and 40" by 70" oval wall sign at 340 Dorset Street These specific design review applications shall require administrative review only by the Code Officer if they are determined to comply with both the master signage plan and the Sign Ordinance in effect at the time of submittal. Ms. Leban seconded. Unanimously approved. 3. Design Review Application, 364-368 Dorset Street Mr. Rabideau introduced the application with updated site plans. He stated that the San Remo Drive hedge had inadvertently been left off the previous landscaping plans. He stated that there would also be gas meters on the north facade. He stated that a dark brown color would be used for the dominant color. Mr. Gibson asked where the free standing sign for the new building CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 would be. Mr. Jaeger provided possible locations for free standing signs but stressed that this was not a sign application at this time. Mr. Rabideau stated that the issue of street lighting was brought up, and the applicant did not feel that they could pursue the installation of street lighting at this time in exchange for a landscaping credit. Mr. Jaeger stated that the applicant might be interested in pursuing a couple of street lights, perhaps at the entrance. Mr. Duff stated that he didn't think it was advisable to just drop a couple of lights in. He was concerned that it would adversely ^ffect the Streetscape plan. Ms. Benoit asked Mr. Rabideau to address the energy efficiency of the building. He stated that the envelope of the building would conform with state energy efficiency guidelines. He stated that the mechanicals for the building were not finalized yet. He stated that heat pumps would probably be used. Mr. Duff stated that'_- - :.: _=:ps require large cooling towers on the site and asked staff to make note of heat pumps in the future. Ms. Leban suggested that the engineers work with Efficiency Vermont on finalizing mechanicals. She recommended that low e - glazing be used on the windows. Ms. Benoit was worried that the applicant would be immediately coming back for approval for a cooling tower. Ms. Leban asked if there were entrance canopies on the east facade. Mr. Rabideau stated that the entrances were pulled into the building and were not canopies. He stated that the entrances on the buildings did not project any further than the other facade projected. The entrances were not porticos particles but rather like hood labels. Ms. Leban stated that there was a much different feel between the east and west facades. She recommended that the west facade should be more similar to the east facade in the center section. Mr. Duff raised concerns on the landscaping on the west facade of the existing building at 368 Dorset Street. Mr. Duff suggested repeating the landscaping around the transformer around the east facade. Mr. Duff stated that the applicant should work with staff to amend the western elevation of the proposed building and amend the landscaping around the eastern facade of the Phase I building at 368 Dorset Street. Mr. Duff then made a motion to the City Center Design Review Committee to recommend approval of the design review application #DR-01-02 of South Burlington Realty Company to amend a planned unit development consisting o£ 1) a 4800 square foot building consisting of 3,600 square feet of convenience store use and a 1200 square foot fast food restaurant with twenty two (22) seats, 2) an 8,060 square foot building consisting of 3500 square feet of general office use and 4560 square feet used for a multiple number of commercial uses for a multiple number of tenants, 3) an 8,944 square foot building (phase 1) and a 13,640 square foot building (phase 2) for a multiple number of commercial uses for a multiple number of tenants, 364, 366 and 368 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of: 1) reducing the 4,800 square foot building consisting of 3,600 square feet of convenience store use and a 1200 square foot fast food restaurant with twenty two (22) seats to 2,400 square feet used for retail at 364 Dorset Street, 2) removing the 13,640 square foot building (phase 2) at 368 Dorset Street used for a multiple number of commercial uses for a multiple number oftenants, and 3) constructing a 20,000 square foot medical office building along the eastern boundary of 364, 366, and 368 Lwset Street, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one entitled "South Burlington Realty", prepared by Greg Rabideau, dated 4/24/01 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The proposed Little Leaf Linden Trees proposed for the western east leg of San Remo Drive should be replaced with 3"- 3 1/2" Chanticleer Pear Trees. b) The plans shall be revised to illustrate a right-of-way dedication for the sidewalk. c) The center bay of the west facade should be redesigned in consultation with staff to make it similar to the center of the east facade. d) The applicant shall work with staffto incorporate a similar landscape design utilized around the transformer around the eastern facade of the Phase I building at 368 Dorset Street. 2 CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 3. Prior to review permit issuance, cut sheets and specifications for all exterior lighting shall be submitted. 4. The applicant should be required to comply with the San Remo Drive Streetscape including, but not limited to, the planting of street trees, a sidewalk along all street frontage. 5. The proposed structure shall utilize a high quality vinyl that does not use a simulated grain. 6. For the purposes of zoning and subdivision z 0�,^ norset Street shall not be exempted from Design Review associated with changes of use or facade modifications. 7. The applicant shall submit information on exterior and site plan impacts of the final design of mech systems prior to permit issuance for staff review. Ms. Leban seconded. Unanimously approved. 4. DesiLynn Review. 372 Dorset Street Mr. Mucklow introduced the proposal. He stated that when the Dorset Street widening project was completed, he was instructed to stop utilizing the existing door on Dorset Street. Mr. Mucklow stated that there were safety issues with sidewalk plows and people entering out onto the sidewalk. Mr. Duff was worried that the applicant would be caught in a Catch 22 where the City may be requiring something different than the State of Vermont. Ms. Benoit asked the applicant if he had documentation to assist in deciphering this requirement. Ms. MacCallum suggested that the applicant research the matter and produce reasonable documentation on these state requirements prior to the Development Review Board's June 6, 2001 meeting. If documentation can not be furnished, the Design Review Committee should take up the application again at their June meeting. Ms. Benoit brought up the issue of screening the meter sockets on the north facade. Mr. Mucklow stated that it would not be a problem. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve the design review application #DR-01-05 of Nigel Mucklow to: 1) add three windows and a sign panel to the north facade, 2) remove the cast stone siding, the current window and door bays, and chimney stack from the west facade, 3) introduce a center side gab;e to the west facade with three six over six pane windows underneath framed on the facade of the building by wooden pilaster strips and flanked on each side by three window bays each with one six over six pane window, and 4) reconfigure the three western most bays on he south facade, 372 Dorset Street, as depicted on a ten (10) page set of planN, Page one entitled "372 Dorset St.", with a stamped received date of 5/3/01 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval ofthe proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The meter sockets on the north facade should be screened by exterior landscaping or a panel in conjunction with staff recommendations. 3. Prior to Development Review Board consideration, the applicant shall furnish reasonable documentation to prove that the State of Vermont requires that all doors along the Dorset Street facade be eliminated. Should the applicant be unable to furnish reasonable documentation, the application shall be remanded to the Design Review Committee. 4. The proposed structure shall utilize a high quality vinyl that does not use a simulated grain. 5. For the purposes of zoning and subdivision, this property shall not be exempted from Design Review associated any air conditioner units, new gas, electric, phone meters, or other utilities on the exterior of the building. CITE' CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 Ms. Benoit seconded. Unanimously approved. 5. Design review. 23 San Remo Drive Mr. Daovdi introduced the proposal. He stated that he was requesting an additional satellite dish to what was there. He was unsure where the location of the dish would be on the building. Ms. Benoit was concerned that there might be many more satellite dishes to follow, perhaps one for each tenant. Mr. Duff stated that dishes should be clustered together on a facade or hidden on the roof line. This should be a mrecedent for future review of satellite dishes. Mr. Daovdi stated that the Committee should review the issue of satellite dishes in its review of new projects in the future. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve design review application #DR-01-04 of Mostafa Daovdi to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of six (6) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two satellite dishes to the exterior facade, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "23 San Remo Drive", with a stamped received date of 5111 /01 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed satellite dishes is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The proposed satellite dishes shall be located on the south facade or on the roofline, no higher then the peak of the roof, approximate to the southwest corner of the building. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from th Z Administrative Officerprior to use ofthe second satellite dish. 5. Any change to the plans shall require rev:—, -La South Burlington Design Review Committee. Ms. Leban seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. 6. Sign Design. 350 Dorset Street Ms. Breen stated that she had a couple of revisions to the stated application. There would be a "Merle Norman" sign above the door and the panel sign on the freestanding sign would read "Merle Norman Cosmetics/Sports Pro Shop". Ms. Leban stated that she did not have any issues with the sign. Ms. Benoit asked what the lighting would be. Ms. MacCallum stated that the existing lighting to be used is most likely incandescent. Mr. Duffmade a motion to approve design review application #DR-01-06 of Margo Breen for a master signage plan. The master signage plan consists of 1) an indirectly illuminated, blue 13' 5" by 28" cut out letter "Net Result Fish Market" wall sign, 2) an indirectly illuminated, white 14' by 10" cut out letter "The Net Result" wall sign, 3) an indirectly illuminated, white 13' 5" by 10" cut out letter "Vivaldi Flowers" wall sign, 4) an indirectly illuminated, white 12' by 10" cut out letter "Merle Norman " wall sign, 5) an indirectly illuminated white 10" cut out letter "Orbit" wall sign and 6) two indirectly illuminated, 26 square foot free standing sign, 350 Dorset Street, as depicted on a seven (7) page set of plans, page one entitled "Merle Norman", dated 5/8/01 with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. U CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to Section Five of the Sign Ordinance or this approval is null and void. 4. Any change to the master signage plan shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve, Ms. Leban seconded. Unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M. LJ, Chair L. '1� 2 �;c Date 5 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VER.MONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 6, 2001 Mr. Nigel Mucklow 2345 Greenbush Road Charlotte, Vermont 05445 Re: Design Review Application 372 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Mucklow: Enclo&,-d is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments. Piease be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Sincerely+, Zaymond J. Belair Administrative Officer SM/td En-, its . i' To: South Burlington Development ment Review Board From: Raymond J. Belr Administrative Officer Re: July 10, 2001 agenda items Date: July 6, 2001, 3) CONSENT AGENDA A) DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION —FACADE ALTERATIONS- NIGEL MUCKLOW 372 DORSET STREET This project consists of: 1) adding three windows and a sign panel to the north fagade, 2) removing the cast stone siding, the current window and door bays, and chimney stack from the west fagade, 3) introducing a cross gable to the west fagade with three six over six pane windows underneath framed on the fagade of the building by wooden pilaster strips and flanked on each side by three window bays each with one six over six pane window, and 4) reconfiguring the three western most bays on the south fagade, 372 Dorset Street. The City Center Design Review Committee reviewed this proposal at their 6/25/01 meeting. The Design Review Committee recommends that the Board approve the application with the following stipulations: This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. The proposed structure shall utilize a high quality vinyl that does not use a simulated grain. 3. All graffiti shall be removed from the exterior of the building. 4. For the purposes of zoning and subdivision, this property shall not be exempted from Design Review associated with air conditioner units, new gas, electric, phone meters, or other utilities on the exterior of the building. JULY 10, 2001 MEETING 5. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 6. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the occupancy of the building. B) DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION — FACADE ALTERATIONS — DESLAURIERS 401 DOREST STREET This project consists of amending the final plat of Charles Deslauriers for a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 184 unit congregate housing facility and a 104 unit emended stay hotel in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of leaving the vent stacks white, 415 Dorset Street. The property located at 401 and 415 Dorset Street lies within the CD3 and R7 Districts. It is bounded on the east by Dorset Street, on the north by Aspen Drive, on the south by a GMP substation, and on the west by the congregate housing portion of the PUD. The City Center Design Review Committee reviewed this proposal at their 6/25/01 meeting. The Design Review Committee recommends that the Board approve the application with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 3. White roof vents or stacks shall not be required to be painted so as to match the siding or roof prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer. C) DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FREESTANDING SIGN — TEESON REAL ESTATE 365 DORSET STREET This project consists of replacing an internally illuminated freestanding sign with an externally illuminated freestanding sign that consists of two (2) sign panels. Sign panel one is two feet by four feet in dimension and employs a green background Pa 6/25/01 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL MUCKLOW, 372 DORSET STREET I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application #DR-01-05 of Nigel Muckiow to: 1) add three windows and a sign panel to the north facade, 2) remove the cast stone siding, the current window and door bays, and chimney stack from the west facade, 3) introduce a center side gable to the west facade with three six over six pane windows underneath framed on the facade of the building by wooden pilaster strips and flanked on each side by three window bays each with one six over six pane window, and 4) reconfigure the three western most bays on the south facade, 372 Dorset Street, as depicted on a ten (10) page set of plans, page one entitled "372 Dorset St.", with a stamped received date of5/3/01 with the following stipulations: This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington .honing Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2- P-ri-or-fi(y-review-by-the--Developmtnt.Review-Board--the piam~shapfi-be arev sLed-to-s-how-tlle.. changes-.listed-beluw.- �I A) The -plans -shall be revised -to elitninate-the-center-three-six-over-six-vvindo-ws-on_th!e s i west -facade: These -windows -shall -be replaeed-mvitl._a..door with,.sidel-ights-and-a--- _transom41ght___.___.. 11 3. The proposed structure shall utilize a high quality vinyl that does not use a simulated grain. 4: All graffiti 4tQo be removed from the exterior of the building. g. For the purposes of zoning and subdivision, this property shall not be exempted from Design Review associatedany y air conditioner units, new gas, electric, phone meters, or other utilities on the exterior ofhhe building. To: South Burlington Design Review Committee From: Sarah MacCallum, Associate Planner Re: June 25, 2001 agenda items Date: June 21, 2001 3) Design Review Application — Renovations - Nigel Mucklow, 375 Dorset Street This project was continued from the May 14, 2001 meeting to provide the applicant time to prove that the door presently located along Dorset Street is not permissible by the State of Vermont (memo enclosed). Staff has since contacted the Vermont Agency of Transportation and received documentation that there are no on -going requirements on the property concerning the door (please see enclosed). The applicant has also submitted information on the City's compensation agreement for the loss of the doorway and resulting interior reconfigurations that occurred during the Dorset Street enhancement project. The applicant has also stated that he will pursue documentation from the Vermont Department of Labor and Industry that the door must swing out and therefore is a safety hazard. This information will be available at the meeting. Unless the applicant can produce documentation from the VT Dept. of Labor and Industry requiring to the contrary, staff recommends that the Committee pursue a door on the west facade of the building as required by Section 24.401(g) of the Zoning Regulations. 4) Design Review Application - Facade Alterations - Charles Deslauriers, 401 Dorset Street This project consists of amending the final plat of Charles Deslauriers for a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 184 unit congregate housing facility and a 104 unit extended stay hotel in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of leaving the vent stacks white, 415 Dorset Street. This constitutes partial relief from condition three of the December 19, 2000 approval (enclosed). The property located at 401 and 415 Dorset Street lies within the CD3 and R7 Districts. It is bounded on the east by Dorset Street, on the north by Aspen Drive, on the south by a GMP substation, and on the west by the congregate housing portion of the PUD. Condition three of the December approval reads as follows: "All galvanized metal and white roof vents or stack shall be painted so as to match the siding or roof prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance." The applicant has requested relief from this requirement for three white PVC vents on the main roof of the Design Advisory Committee Memo May 14, 2001 Other: This project will require 193 parking spaces. Only 165 spaces are being provided for a 28 space or 14.5% shortfall. The spaces provided include the addition of 21 on -street parking spaces. Five handicapped spaces are being provided as required. A bike rack must also be provided. Staff recommends a significant parking waiver for this lot provided that the applicant removes most of the parking from the building envelope along the corner of San Remo Drive This plan shows a large number, 64 out of 141, of parking spaces located within the building envelope and which are not hidden from view by a building. The actual proposed spaces represent 33% of the total required parking and 34.6% of the allowable building envelope. Section 14.402 of the Zoning Regulations requires that parking be located out of the building envelope unless the parking is hidden from view from a public street or the parking represents a minor portion of the required total parking, and the parking is occupying a minor portion of the building envelope. The applicant has shifted the proposed building to the corner of San Remo Drive thereby decreasing the number of proposed parking spaces within the building envelope. Staff does not have a problem with the proposed plan. 5 Design Review Application — renovations - Ni2el Mucklow, 375 Dorset Street This project consists of: 1) adding three windows and a sign panel to the north facade, 2) removing the cast stone siding, the current window and door bays, and chimney stack from the west fagade, 3) introducing a cross gable to the west fagade with three six over six pane windows underneath framed on the fagade of the building by wooden pilaster strips and flanked on each side by three window bays each with one six over six pane window, and 4) reconfiguring the three western most bays on the south fagade, 372 Dorset Street. This property is located within Central District Two and Design Review District Two. It is bounded on the west by Dorset Street, on the north by a commercial property, and on the south and east by open land. Consistent Design: The applicant has proposed removing the cast stone siding from the west and south facades of the building and residing with vinyl. New six over six windows will be added to these facades as well as the north fagade. The east fagade as well as the north and south facades of the ell will remain unchanged. These facades are associated with a storage use on the rear of the building. The majority of what is visible from the public right of way will be united by vinyl clapboard siding. There is currently vinyl clapboard siding on the north facade of the building. This siding will be continued along the Dorset Street fagade and south fagade. The green trim will match the existing trim on the north fagade. The proposed changes will unify half of the building while leaving the un-renovated storage area untouched and contrasting to the rest of the building. The proposed changes will not make the renovated portion of the building contrast drastically with the un-renovated portion, 4 Design Advisory Committee Memo May 14, 2001 but the difference will be noticeable. The proposed alterations will complement the new construction at 368 Dorset Street and 415 Dorset Street which utilize the same color scheme and materials. If the ivory siding was not already existing on the building, staff would probably recommend that a different base color be used for the building to prevent the streetscape from becoming monotonous. Materials Used: The applicant has proposed vinyl siding and asphalt shingle for the roof. These materials are already present on the building and have been approved by the Committee previously within Design Review District Two. Staff recommends that the simulated wood grain vinyl siding be avoided in favor of vinyl siding without a simulated texture. Colors and Textures: The applicant has proposed removing the cast stone siding and replacing it with ivory vinyl clapboard siding with "Wildwood" green trim. These colors complement the colors existing on the north fagade of the building. Staff recommends that the simulated wood grain vinyl siding be avoided in favor of vinyl siding without a simulated texture. Windows & Doors: The applicant has proposed six over six pane windows. There are currently one over one pane windows on the building. The replacement windows will span over entire facades so that only the new windows will be visible to the public streets thereby creating a unified look to the building. Currently there are windows varying in size, some of which have been removed and boarded over, on the building. Section 21.201(d) requires that the majority of the first floor's fagade area consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity in Design District Two. The applicant has proposed to increase the amount of glass on the north, west, and south facades. Human Scale Design: - The applicant has proposed a cross gable with pilaster strips centered on the west, or the street, fagade. This introduces elements that reduce the building's apparent overall size. The new design elements break the monotony of the west fagade and add design elements to a fagade that was previously devoid of architectural detailing. Roof as a Design Element: The proposed cross gable will penetrate the length of the current side gable which dominates the Dorset Street facade. This interruption will serve to break up an otherwise monotonous facade. The use of pilaster strips will tie the new roof design element into the block of the structure. Orient Buildings to Public Streets: Section 24.401(g) of the Zoning Regulations requires that the primary entrance to buildings shall be "oriented directly on the public street rather than facing parking lots". The applicant has proposed eliminate the single existing entranceway on Dorset Street and replacing it with three six over six windows. Staff recommends that these proposed windows be replaced with a door with sidelights and perhaps a transom light. An entranceway should be Design Advisory Committee Memo May 14, 2001 required on the Dorset Street facade. Conceal Rooftop Devices: No rooftop devices are proposed. Landscape and Plantings: No changes are proposed. Efficient and Effective Circulation: No changes are proposed. Outdoor Lighting: No changes are proposed. Special Features: The applicant has not proposed any air conditioner units, new gas, electric, or phone meters on the exterior of the building. 6. Design Review Application— Satellite Dish - Mostafa Daovdi, 23 San Remo Drive This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of six (6) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding a satellite dish to the exterior facade, 23 San Remo Drive. The Committee should note that there is currently an illegal satellite dish installed on the east facade of the building. The applicant wishes to install a second dish in an unknown location. Consistent Design: There are currently no approved satellite dishes within the Design Review Districts. This will set a precedent for how the Committee handles review of satellite dishes. The Committee currently requires that all utilities are concealed or incorporated into the design of the building. Digital satellite dishes are hard to place on a building as the location of these dishes are often dictated by signal receptiveness. The consistent design criteria of Section 24.40 of the Zoning Regulations states that "building design shall promote consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design". It is staff's recommendation that if the Committee should permit satellite dishes within the Design Review Districts, these dishes should be treated similarly to other equipment or utilities and incorporated into the design of the building through roof decks or cupolas or otherwise concealed from view. Roof as a Design Element/ Conceal Roof Top Devices: It is unknown if the satellite dish will be added to the roofline or to the facade of the building. There are currently no roof top devices present on the building. Staff would recommend that if a dish is added to the roof top, a roof deck or cupola be added to screen the dish. 0 TO: ,Sarah McAllum. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FACMIMS FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL. FORM PAGES: _. 2 ((including cover sheet) 17 FAX #: 846 4101 7, E I V E D _City of South Burlington, Dorset St � MAY 2 9 _South Burlington Vt City of So. Burlington FROM: Dan -Allen FAX# (802) 828-5712 Vermont Agency of Transportation Local Transportation Facilities (LTI~) PHONE #:828 4691 National Life Building, Drawer 33 Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 SUBJECT: Attached is a copy of the right of way agreement between the city and Nigel Mucklow. I checked with Allen Blake, the Agencies Chief of Right of Way and he informed me that there is no ongoing requirement that there be no entrance located an the front of the Mucklow building. Any change to the existing situation is now subject to current city planning and zoning regulations. If you or Mr Mucklow need any finthex confirmation of this you can reach Mr Blake at 828 2570. 70053 '�)Ql -QtMJy T9001 )UO ZTli gag ZOQ YV3 TVOL MIX YO/BZrCO F:i! ' 3t. PERMISSION FOR STAIR REMOVAL I, NIGEL MUCRLOW, being the record owner of property commonly designated as 372 Dorset Street in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, hereby give my permission to the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, the STATE of vERHONT, and the CONTRACTOR on the Dorset Street Improvement Project, to remove in their entirety the concrete st6ps currently serving the front entrance to the building on said property, subject to the fo?.lowing conditions: 1. that I be given written notice at least 60 days prier to removal of the stairs; 2.. that prior to removal of the stairs the CONTRACTOR confirm that the door leading to the stairs has been sealed or obstructed so as to prevent ingress and egress; 3. that if the door has not been so sealed cr obstructed, the CONTRACTOR shall first seal or obstruct the door to prevent ingress and egress prior to removing the stairs. Dated this day of P" !F1 C, I ! V F x:NSOIT i.ram MA I 9 20 City of So. Burlington Ni4VIJ Mucklow 70a[a ► �t1 J AJ J�� 5ur;1i TE?� Id IOC 7T1C C20 700 VV,i 22_DT ',Till T6J471e0 CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 3. Prior to review permit issuance, cut sheets and specifications for all exterior lighting shall be submitted. 4. The applicant should be required to comply with the San Remo Drive Streetscape including, but not limited to, the planting of street trees, a sidewalk along all street frontage. 5. The proposed structure shall utilize a high quality vinyl that does not use a simulated grain. 6. For the purposes of zoning and subdivision ZFn norset Street shall not be exempted from Design Review associated with changes of use or facade modifications. 7. The applicant shall submit information on exterior and site plan impacts of the final design of mech systems prior to permit issuance for staff review. Ms. Leban seconded. Unanimously approved. 4. Design Review, 372 Dorset Street Mr. Mucklow introduced the proposal. He stated that when the Dorset Street widening project was completed, he was instructed to stop utilizing the existing door on Dorset Street. Mr. Mucklow stated that there were safety issues with sidewalk plows and people entering out onto the sidewalk. Mr. Duffwas worried that the applicant would be caught in a Catch 22 where the City may be requiring something different than the State of Vermont. Ms. Benoit asked the applicant if he had documentation to assist in deciphering this requirement. Ms. MacCallum suggested that the applicant research the matter and produce reasonable documentation on these state requirements prior to the Development Review Board's June 6, 2001 meeting. If documentation can not be furnished, the Design Review Committee should take up the application again at their June meeting. Ms. Benoit brought up the issue of screening the meter sockets on the north facade. Mr. Mucklow stated that it would not be a problem. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve the design review application #DR-01-05 of Nigel Mucklow to: 1) add three windows and a sign panel to the north facade, 2) remove the cast stone siding, the current window and door bays, and chimney stack from the west facade, 3) introduce a center side gable to the west facade with three six over six pane windows underneath framed on the facade of the building by wooden pilaster strips and flanked on each side by three window bays each with one six over six pane window, and 4) reconfigure the three western most bays on the south facade, 372 Dorset Street, as depicted on a ten (10) page set of planb,,age one entitled "372 Dorset St.", with a stamped received date of 5/3/01 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval ofthe proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The meter sockets on the north facade should be screened by exterior landscaping or a panel in conjunction with staff recommendations. 3. Prior to Development Review Board consideration, the applicant shall furnish reasonable documentation to prove that the State of Vermont requires that all doors along the Dorset Street facade be eliminated. Should the applicant be unable to furnish reasonable documentation, the application shall be remanded to the Design Review Committee. 4. The proposed structure shall utilize a high quality vinyl that does not use a simulated grain. 5. For the purposes of zoning and subdivision, this property shall not be exempted from Design Review associated any air conditioner units, new gas, electric, phone meters, or other utilities on the exterior of the building. Pn,-- D�7r, CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 Ms. Benoit seconded. Unanimously approved. 5. Design review, 23 San Remo Drive Mr. Daovdi introduced the proposal. He stated that he was requesting an additional satellite dish to what was there. He was unsure where the location of the dish would be on the building. Ms. Benoit was concerned that there might be many more satellite dishes to follow, perhaps one for each tenant. Mr. Duff stated that dishes should be clustered together on a facade or hidden on the roof line. This should be a precedent for future review of satellite dishes. Mr. Daovdi stated that the Committee should review the issue of satellite dishes in its review of new projects in the future. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve design review application 9DR-01-04 of Mostafa Daovdi to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of six (6) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two satellite dishes to the exterior facade, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "23 San Remo Drive", with a stamped received date of 5111/01 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed satellite dishes is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The proposed satellite dishes shall be located on the south facade or on the roofline, no higher then the peak of the roof, approximate to the southwest corner of the building. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from tL., Administrative Officer prior to use of the second satellite dish. 5. Any change to the plans shall require rev.'-., c., -'.e South Burlington Design Review Committee. Ms. Leban seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. 6. SiLn Design, 350 Dorset Street Ms. Breen stated that she had a couple of revisions to the stated application. There would be a "Merle Norman" sign above the door and the panel sign on the freestanding sign would read "Merle Norman Cosmetics/Sports Pro Shop". Ms. Leban stated that she did not have any issues with the sign. Ms. Benoit asked what the lighting would be. Ms. MacCallum stated that the existing lighting to be used is most likely incandescent. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve design review application #DR-01-06 of Margo Breen for a master signage plan. The master signage plan consists of 1) an indirectly illuminated, blue 13' 5" by 28" cut out letter "Net Result Fish Market" wall sign, 2) an indirectly illuminated, white 14' by 10" cut out letter "The Net Result" wall sign, 3) an indirectly illuminated, white 13' 5" by 10" cut out letter "Vivaldi Flowers" wall sign, 4) an indirectly illuminated, white 12' by 10" cut out letter "Merle Norman " wall sign, 5) an indirectly illuminated white 10" cut out letter "Orbit" wall sign and 6) two indirectly illuminated, 26 square foot free standing sign, 350 Dorset Street, as depicted on a seven (7) page set of plans, page one entitled "Merle Norman", dated 5/8/01 with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 4 05/'28f01 TUE 13:46 F." z001 a,-,pland Floor C... "Poe Finest in Ne,,v England Quality &-Service" FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE:_ TO: kd A 1 NIA C c AA--iArj COMPANY: N i & C- -- /OVAGK L," FAX #:F//, FROM:-- NUMBER OF SHEETS: NOTES: MY AW` cw . powAywe-,v pKlumoNjj� I ry D r c,4'T l r,4 C= r 'TW 701,J -r,:> tie—L o cA-T'c GN y R,n ,Ca . 1'1'r RAC -10 `i to P>ut La It1S lJ i S T �i lR LZPKT 61 M'110 i G-6: MzL ' I °T �- hC P V'C> } i U C. fLA CamD F WA-- y v 'r-- F &WWKI-7 O r1 >C.)CLS earl 257 PINE STREET, BURLINGTON, `JT054CI-4736 (802) 658-9336 FAX (802) 658-6.194 05/29/01 TUE 13:47 FAX Q002 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY( SS. IN RE: DORSET STREET PRCJECT M--EGC 5200(8) * CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Parcel No. 9 - 372 Dorset St. * CITY COUNCIL owner: N`.gel Mucklow Mortgagee:The Merchants Bank ORDER The above -captioned matter came on for hearing before the City of South Burlington City Council on April 30, 1990. The hearing on the above -referenced parcel -remained open until May 14, 1990, to allow for the submission of further written evidence, at which time the public nearing was officially closed. Upon consideraticn of the highway condemnation provisions contained in 19 V.S.A., Chapter 7, evidence and statements presented by Vermont Agency of Transportation personnel, and evidence and statements presented by the j property owner, the Council. herein sets forth its Findings of Fact, conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. This project entails widening and reconstructing Dorset St::-eet between its intersection with U.S. Route 2 (Williston Road) and a point approximately 400 feet south of the intersection of Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive. 1 00r901O1 TUE 10;40 FAX 1000 2. 1'he City Council of the City of South Burlington found the z-equisite necessity for this project in its order dated Febrtflary 1, 1988, which is recorded in Volume 259 on Pages 464-4:75 of the City of Sou-h Burlington Land Records. 3. 'his highway project is depicted on plans entitled, "Proposed Improvements - city cf South Burlington - Ccunty oa: Chittenden - Dorset Street - T.H. No. 5 CL.2 (FACJ) Kennedy Drive to williston Road, Right of way Plans," Project No. M-EGC 5200(8), dated July 8, 1987, as amended, which cons-:itute the premises survey required by 19 V.S.A. §710 (1987). 4. The City provided statutory notice of its April 30, 1990 hearing by sending certified mail, return receipt requested, written notice to the record property owner and mortgage holder at least thirty (30) days prior to the hearing. 5. Notice of the April. 30, 1990 hearing was also sent to the City Planning Commission by certified mail, return receipt requested, and posted in the City of South Burlington Clerk's office at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. A copy of the Public Hearing notice was published in The Burlington Free Press on April 18, 1990. 6. Parcel No. 9 is depicted on Sheet 44 of the i project plans referred to in Findings of Fact, Paragraph 3. 0S%29:01 TtiE 13:49 FAX 004 7. ','he project necessitates the acquisition of - --- - approximately 0.05 acres of land fronting along the Dorset Street right-of-way, as well as a temporary drive right, and a temporary slope right. 8. AS a result of construction of the project, the entrances -to the two retail establishments on the subject i property will have to be relocated from the westerly to the northerly side of the existing building, thereby necessitating the reconfiguration of the internal workings of the building. 9. Mr. Reginald Qrvis, Review Appraiser with the State of Vermont Agency of Transportation, estimated the value of the land and rights to be acquired for the project over Parcel No. 9, as well as the takings impact on the existing structure, to be $73,600.00, broken down as follows: land - $17,500.00; severance damages - $32,400.00; cost to cure - $28,600.00; and temporary rights - $100.00. 10. The property owner represented himself at the hearing on April 30, 1990. 11. By letter dated May 11, 1990, the property owner requested a settlement of $103,000.00 as copensation for the taking's impact on Parcel No. 9. 12. The property owner had no problem with the i compensationr offered for the land acquired, as it was consistent with the compensation paid to other property owners on Dorset Street. 3 UZ/;:S,,'U1 TUE 13*.30 FAX 003 :.3. .,he property owner did object to the amount of compensation for the cost to cure the internal workings of the building and the relocation of the entrances .necessitat-ad by construction of the project. 14. 'The property owners obtained three bids from different contractors for the construction of the required changes to the building on the subject parcel. 15. the bid by Oberlander Hurd Corporation of $37,548-00 added 53.8% for overhead and profit to the estimated cost of labor, and 70.2% for overhead and profit to the estimated cost of materials. 16. The bid by Great Northern Construction, Inc., of $38,643.26 added 54% for overhead and profit to the estimated cost of labor, and 74.3% for overhead and pr��fit to the estimated cost of material. 17. The bid by Barclay H. Morris Fine Building was pl for $35,675-00. 18. The property owner submitted an estimat-a of $6,464.00 for the installation of new flooring for the reconfigured retail space. 19. The property owner also claims that the new, relocated parking area must be resurfaced at a cost of $8,000.00. 4 20. The property owner has requested $5,OCO.00 to - cover the cost of relocating one of the retail businesses for two months during the period of construction of the project. 21. The sign located on the subject premisees was considered personalty by the State's appraiser, and therefore the reasonable cost of relocating the .;ign will be taken care of under the State's relocation assistance program. 22. Although trucks travelling south on Dorset Street will not have direct left hand turn access to the: subject parcel, they will be able to turn around at a sicfnalized intersection at the South Burlington High School. 23. The Council inspected the subject premises on May 5, 1990, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 1.1:1.10 a.m. The property owner accompanied the Council on this site inspection. 24. The Council finds that the estimate submitted by Barclay H. Morris - Fine Building, which included everything except flooring, is reasonable. 25. The Council finds that the property owner's estimate of 404 square yards of flooring to be unreasonable E d00gn VVII a 9 ! 0 T 'r"xS. Tr 3u/QG 05,'29/01 TUE 13.31 FAX a006 and that a reasonable price for flooring would be approximatjjly 1/2 of the property owner's estimate. CONC "S OWNS OFLAW ,�lj statutory requirements concerning warning/ notificatiOn, and conduct of- a public hearing and examinatic-n of affected property f-for the purpose of determining the amount of compensation due the affected property owner have been complied with. 2. The compensation set forth below reflects adequate payment to compensate the property owner in light of the value for the most reasonable use of the property involved and the direct and proximate lessening in the value of the property let -tired by the property owner. ORDER WHEREFOP-E, it is hereby ORDERED,ADJuDGE:) and DECREED* 1. That 'che lands'and rights over Parcel No. 9 described on Sheet 44 of the project plans referred to in Findings I-)f Fact, Paragraph 3, are hereby condemned pursuant to 19 Chapter 7; 2. That Nigel Mucklow and The Merchants Bank he compansated in the amount of $88,907.00. 3. That within two months of the.date of this order, Nigel Muc'clow shall remove any fences, timber, wood or trees which he Is requested to in connection with this project. R 00"Z0/01 'TUE 50:00 FM 000 After the expiration of the two months, the -City .will take posseSsion of the land and rights, remove obstructions therefrom and lay the lands open for working and travel. DATED at south Burlington, Vermont, this day of June, 1990. #i2jb98 C=°ry COUNCIL OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Paul A Farrar, }airman Michaelty/� AT ohn B. Dinklage J.amip-s ,C . Condos William J. Cimonetti 7 05/121,101 LION 12:47 FAX Z001 ,,gland Floor C.,._ "The Finest In New England Quality & Ser wce- y j4Kj 2 1 200 C, y of So. BurI1110 n May 21, 2001 Sarah MacCallcn City of South Burlington Plaataing and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Sarah: I did find notes concerning the appraisal and damages caused by the widening of Dorset Street. ','here was an offer made by the State of Vermont which was contested. The amount was increased to cure the cost of changing entrances. (Bear Quick print occupied the spe a with existing door). New England Floor Covering changed the door from the front tc, the side at the time of the land acquisition. If you have any questions, please call me at 658-9336. Yours sincerely, Nigel Mucklow 257 PINL= STREET, BURLINGTON, VT ^V5401-4736 (802) 653-9336 PAX (,802) 658-6194 05; 21/101 MON 12:48 FAIT Z002 REVIEWER'S NOTATIONS ,January 22 , 1990 Appraiser: Michael R. (03rien Report Dated September 28, 1989 DISTRIBUTION: Prop. Adm. File Property: Nigel MuckloF? Parcel # 9 Appraiser Central Files Project: South Burlington MECC 5200 (8) Review Appr. Reviewed By: Willis J. Morse w.,.L V Note: "A" Items are clarifications by the Reviewer, requiring no further action by the Appraiser. "B" Items require clarification(s) by the Appraiser. ITEM Portion of Report: Remarks: The appraiser's calculation of the severance damages due to the parking change situation appears to be in error. He estimates a 79 loss in value because )f this but makes his calculation using the before rather than after value. The calculation should be as follows: $480,000 (Before Value) - $17,500 (Land Taking)= $462,500 x 77 - $32,375. "A-2" The cost to cure of $26,000 was based on an estimate prepared by Gregory Jeffers of Construction Management, Inc. on May I, 1988. This cost was to cure severance damages which otherwise would occur because of loss of physical access from the front of the building to one of the rental units (Bear Qu:',ek Print). Per Mr. Jeffers this estimate should be increased by approximately 10% to reflect late 1989 or early 1990 prices. Doing so increases this estimate to approximately $28,600. "A-3"' As a rest:lt of Notations A-1 and A-2 the estimate of damages is revised and summarized as follows: Land.......................................................... - $17,500 Severance Damages ............................................. - $32,400 Rounded from $32,375 Cost toCure.................................................. _ $28,600 Temporary Easements ......................................... - $ 100 Tonal $78,600 The estimated after value is $480,000-$78,500................ - $401,500 05;21/01 MON 12:49 F.0 Z 003 AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Appraisal Record FROM: /C_... , r ��-7 Reginal E. Orivs, Review Appraiser DATE: June 25, 1991 SUBJECT: So. Burlington MEGC-j%4S200 C8? Parcel 9 - N;.gel Mucklow The appraisal pr,=pared for court purpose with a date of value 6/11/90 reflects damages of $86,100 ve:csus the previous report with damages of $77,100 as of 9/23/89. The only change in this report from the prior one is in cost to cure damages. The estimated value of land taken and non curable severance damages are unchanged. The reason the cost to cu1-e is revised is that the appraiser has an updated estimate from the original general c:ontractdr as well as three other estimates from other contractors which were provided by either the property owner or the City of So. Burlington officials. The appraiser has utilized all of these estimates and concluded a figura within the range to be appropriate. His analysis is logical And well explained and the conclusions are accepted as reasonable and fair. REO:hfm 05,1211/01 MON 12:49 FAX rioP, Q004 GREAT NORTHERN CONSTRUCTION, INC- 199 Church Sr. Burlington, VT 362.1463 Bit,xcll 21 1990 Dear Nigel, I have come up with a competitive price to reconstruct the floor space for New England Floor Covering and Bear Quick PrInt j, have used the outline-prbviddd�:by-. tau. to break down the costs. 1`6 is always difficult to be totally accurate in each area therefore I would not consider doing only parts of the job. My price is based on the total. •Total cost: $38,643.26 yours sincerely, Bob Schwartz President 05/21/ 01 MON 12:50 FAX t£ij005 OBERLANDER HURD CORPORATION SHELHURNE, VT 05402 (002) 905-9713 nPP,IL :5, 1990 BiD: $37,540 PLUS TAX RE: REMODELLING BEAR QUICK PR119T AND HEW VIGLAND FLOUR COYEPHZ, INC. 37 2 DORSET ST- SO. BURLI hh;TOt-I, YT 05403 PRICE I$GOOD UNTIL DECEMBER 1990 :.o 1OE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 To: Fronc Fa)c 6's - 6- (1 Datm Phone: Pages: -7, Re: '-:� , 2 "" - CC: 4P 100, e e 1 5114101 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL MUCKLOW, 372 DORSET STREET I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application #DR-01-05 of Nigel Mucklow to: 1) add three windows and a sign panel to the north fagade, 2) remove the cast stone siding, the current window and door bays, and chimney stack from the west fagade, 3) introduce a center side gable to the west fagade with three six over six pane windows underneath framed on the fagade of the building by wooden pilaster strips and flanked on each side by three window bays each with one six over six pane window, and 4) reconfigure the three western most bays on the south fagade, 372 Dorset Street, as depicted on a ten (10) page set of plans, page one entitled "372 Dorset St.", with a stamped received date of 5/3/01 with the following stipulations: This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer, 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: "e-plans all--be•revised fd a iminate-the eenter•three.six.over s ,windows -on -the west..facade..-._These..windows shall be -replaced 'with a door with sidelights -and .a.,— transorii'"1 t. �_— ` � 1'� � �� ✓ �GC YC 115 :V,r, �' i_�;?b Cf %✓iG�_S Ct " �%'� ex t o s . ,..� The proposed structure shall utilize a high quality vinyl that does not use a simulated gram. :t For the purposes of zoning and subdivision, this property shall not be exempted from Design Review associated any air conditioner units, new gas, electric, phone meters, or other utilities on the exterior of the building. i l ( ril !✓ 6-Z le: ✓i' �1-'`�C'�G ...SG=�7c:m / C:.- >�ir.�-^ j^.-: �^".T,r �'. ��.jQ'�` `c ..,7� < ,�_._, S �f y // '7- z-,47Z-7 -Ov? C.11411V Z&Ve -6r4;-1a-Y ea-A77ov I 7{-,-K- (Uo7;e,, d'Ile IOVE & T (T) ACVV�Z� CIS /Yo. )-rlcyy I eaYA•, C, 107,-2e. 7-9 C01VC 7- SR IT) Ci .2 -7-, k---tf3, AlCvl zl5* .0 INSTALL & MAINT. (P) DORSET LAND CO. INC. SR DRIVE 9) 467' j' /' �I-----N--- �--- -,---�-~-�/- 57j-- --vl ----µme - -/Z-- - -' F - - P�P-' 129-27 77 9'RT. T-77 7.77 28'RT: �l -5;C, . xi C II UV -0 116 10 E2 I Xc\j 11-1, 100' U LL 30 45 ccv, c. DRIVE (T SR (T!/ 30'RT. -128 0k 4zv, 1 */1 --v z�F129-27 4 TA 49*RT. 49'RT. HY--GLUTTEN NIGEL MUCKLOW COMPANY' cz.. 'OL RANDALL G. MUNSON d/ SO. BURLINGTON REALT /YOTE/YO 41,41C th or 0-(�o ae_, T of, p L 51E -51M Ck-3, 7rz'� 4?9 --5-5 C'�!;W7- 0' T N C, Elk/' �j . W MM 0 3 20 4% 90 Ity of to. Burlington vf;-1w4 By 710= BY MY 4 7 I -f -I k -' `3 V' L 7- 1 < j 0 U 1 REC-EIVED MAYO 3 2001 Cj� of So. Burlington No Text -4�1 t zo S,Vq 0 3 2001 7 r�7 MY 0 3 20M MAY 0 3 2001 CITY OF SOUTH BLTRLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 9, 2001 Nigel Mucklow 2545 Greenbrush Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Design Review Application, 372 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Mucklow: Enclosed is the agenda for the next Tuesday's Design Review Committee meeting and my comments. Please be sure someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, May 14, 21001 at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum, Associate Planner SM/mcp Encls fZt:eTA l< v N ovtT 1-1 7- �- 17 IOVE 8 ET (T) �7Ai /O/.' oTf; i /�.'.'Z•-_GGYfa7K-✓Y l.Ef)CT.�! 3TAT/cYY CGY.�177P f' 7%r�E 4W.077f /2(o t25 lvLT Jr Z - /6' Oel�lr"-W.4'YD A5CI'l -54F C�r- 6lJ/LO/iYCr NO. STAT/GYY CGYAT/O/Y DE�%4/�/ SR (T) !� O 49 �,� �?�•SO�T/kSG:/.�k�4:�'-;c Ef%�b1i! ,et;�r-� c�•t,c�r ,ems- ci;�:c�i� µ��r _ _ � — ,Gan• �5- /cam y3 L r, /J.rf-t/.E5".• %�/? '.t� i� CG�..�",SZL! _ /2Bj°/ =! _/Z6rV3RT nEW24_'r �O.`— RGPIGLASSIIL -- /cf3.4� -/c��-SO .l T, /le�dti c�•".r/c6 :E%�? Cr.�'�III n7 �3 !oJ /c�'7 i-/�S+•.Nl.f'.8�'7'�'Y,c� E.l'/:7 �rfCC:'i%'J� .E2�;t2E S�'.C�7' C !o/ %ZS•'77-%�.•t5'��7,-�Y�E—/'/`T;��/J7/�E�/I�G�c�++'/ST/y' ,2<r9 : 24 c�.t B> KJ:r/rC /✓�/ C /�Li 9=.PT /29-2G /.�-G.=.Pi",e�/i',C"t� �f'/� %c' �,✓t'"z'.'%YJ/7.cH:�:CE=f�Y.C3T G5 G !03 GZ/a "E"C//Y! 0 r 5G C'T• - OCy?3ET ST /2JsSo .?T NEYIJ /5 x Z/p' GSA . NEB/ 45'C51 c BoW.odyCE [./ntFOtSZ-COY/YiCTTGG�/,S; vrro�s ¢' fiusii INSTALL 8 MAINT. (P) DORSET LAND CO. INC. DRIVE Ci) _ 467' - - SR (T) -__—_- -T-. - 46F.'- Z < i G Z7i i C_io..i- �d//_ / �'E'r- c"7=:-r=:._(�,'� ✓� n�; �i12s�27 Q - - - - — �- ---IN•i`7-- - - - - - - �1 / 29'RT. - - 127�77 28'RT. I 2 Ccc r�o _ =c7— — — GC/i_. :�_ — — E -- T �_ — — — — ._`t'!i— — SR (T) DRIVE (T 1 6•w u 30'RT. --f2g T7-I 0 u N I �Fov ' 4�'P,,T U' ' v I ( 129.27 126.77 49'ftT. 49'RT. NIGEL MUCKLOW i HY--GLUTTEN. 8 COMPANY' R /vu+rc / i/ OL -I Qy>ST,F�C'T .�4T/JS7C'T RANDALL G. MUNSON d/ �j SO. BURLINGTON REALT / O7T5— /YO Ri Fi4YJ. P L C2-YK9TE�J• .S/CFGf/,4C.0 .P.4/J"7o .'�c--,5M C�3, 7I/. .97.4TCYY fGt 9T.t� Y 7YT /cc3--_9 /29.2, C�/GNT / ' k W DAT :.� n vl C s/c�wA�r 4z) 5 srAno/V cCt-A71rrV o /ggo /2Bri-4 9 �' I n . � +uxlCreo PRAWN By TR.t,,=v BY CITY ( JCSLIL��`�ri F'r.C.l. 14-E c 'T 4 WEST Ei.E�/,--TION - -Mmmmmmmm�- 'Imwm�� min= �i� Olf 610 ( C .. _ - 4 �r . W rrti O�JEN f �� k'a. _. - .. .`- '- I _. lNw4i .. �.... .+�. wgs�YrrwrYK+�iY�+,i .. �� ' ;�- � t.j � e - . '=� MUMMI MOO FFM Fw P&4 V. 00-0, cli -73 meal W, :Q 53 if X ..... ........ WT 3 Ph a e_ p G cTA t1-- E • - v4 i Fri l 2s 1 1 r. f u r ; a Pa-JJ21:, � •�-�1 � I — KOALT 1.1 No Text No Text No Text ON IOVE & �T I -VZ77e�V c0<fA7XlV ht� 7-Al 447Z- C11411V I-IIY-- 43 I-C-,6:7- Z11&41A�f�l�,' Awo /yo, -rloy Jfa?F/ 79 C01Y,77- SR IT) Ale :f)5 Z-3 tll.;z -- - - GZA ZIIV� 0 - 6 Z -r - IZ9,- 50 4-7- IYcY!/ A5-, Alevl 45 * c 5/POW INSTALL & MAINT. (P) DORSET LAND CO INC 7-- 27 I t7lf7 127.77 2--- 8'RT: 4 AIR Z 77� 7-Z F, SIR (T) 7X 9-27 I NN 9'RT. 4 125 c\j a, i �o 4 in 10 0 Fu s 100' re /.S cc. DRIVE (T /�U iµ SR (T) s 1 6. kv 30*RT. N 129.27 126.77 49'RT. 49-RT, LEI- T NIGEL MUCKLOW HY--GLUTTEN A,,/ & COMPANY' )OL RANDALL G. MUNSON d/ SO. BURLINGTON REALT /Y07<5- IYO ,COT /09,000. /9 CZW97' co/ y 0f p L /30 54�ZZD Ck.3, 7.11c <-9 DAT v A511 *0405 e1l04:a.1A4& /�?-) Irks -fr4;701V 1 qQ 'o PrIA.W4 ey llta=-D By ctry s CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & 'ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee FROM: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner AyJ, �^ DATE. November 8, 2004 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION DR-04-10 372 Dorset Street The subject application is for a Master Signage Permit. The applicant submitted a request for approval to amend a Master Signage Permit on November 8, 2004, so that future tenants are able to receive sign permits. The applicant is seeking approval to replace two (2) existing wall signs. The subject property is located at 372 Dorset Street and is in the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District (DS/CC Sign District). Pursuant to Section 6 of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance, the erection, alteration, or relocation of any sign within this district shall require design review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee (DRC) and Development Review Board (DRB). Section 8 of the Sign Ordinance requires all property owners within the DS/CC Sign District to obtain a Master Signage Permit prior to the issuance of any individual sign permits for the subject property. Section 8(e)(1) requires that the property owner of record be the primary permitee of a Master Signage Permit. The record owner of the property is Dorset Communications, LLC. 1. A Master Signage Permit shall be issued to Dorset Communications, LLC by the DRB, prior to the issuance of any individual sign permit for the property. Pursuant to Section 8 of the Sign Ordinance, a Master Signage Permit shall establish consistent design parameters for the property to ensure that all signage is in accordance with goals of the DS/CC Sign District. The Master Signage Permit shall specify size ranges and the graphic elements to be used to relate multiple signs to one another. The current application consists of a request for two (2) wall -mounted signs. 372 Dorset Street Design Review Application DR-04-10 Page 2 of 4 DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA In reviewing an application for signage, the DRC and DRB shall consider the following: (a) Consistent Design The design of a sign must be compatible and harmonious with the design of buildings on the subject property and nearby. Staff feels the proposed signs are compatible with the existing building and the surrounding buildings. They will be constructed of opaque vinyl, translucent vinyl, and acrylic. They will be internally illuminated. (b) Promotion of City Center Goals Signs within the DS/CC Sign District should be of high aesthetic quality and pedestrian oriented. The proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement. (c) Color & Texture The applicant has proposed to use gold, red, black, and white as colcors for signage on this property. The proposed color scheme complies with the standard in Section 6(b)(3) that states, "The use of a maximum of three (3) predominant colors is encouraged to provide consistent foreground, text, and background color schemes." In addition, staff feels the texture of the proposed signs is compatible and harmonious with buildings on the property and nearby. 2. The colors of the signs shall include gold, red, black, and white. (d) Materials Used The proposed signs will be constructed of opaque vinyl, translucent vinyl, and acrylic. Staff feels the materials of the proposed signs are of high -quality and are complimentary to the building. (e) Wall Mounted Signs Section 10 of the Sign Ordinance governs the size and location of wall -mounted signs. Pursuant to Table 10-1, the wall -mounted sign shall not exceed 15% of the area of the principal public facade or 100 sq. ft., whichever is smaller. The proposed wall signs will have a total area of 41 square feet, which complies with this requirement. Section 10(b)(2) states that a wall -mounted sign cannot exceed 15% of the area of the facade to which it is attached. 372 Dorset Street Design Review Application DR-04-10 Page 3 of 4 The proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement Section 10(c) states that a wall -mounted sign shall not project above the roof or parapet of the building nor below the top of any first floor doorway unless permitted through the design review approval process. The proposed sign locations will not project above the roof or parapet of the subject building. In addition, the proposed sign locations will not extend below the top of any first floor doorways. Thus, the proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement. Pursuant to Section 10(d), a wall -mounted sign shall not cover any opening or project beyond the top or end of any wall to which it is attached. The proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement. Section 10(g) stipulates that a wall -mounted sign shall not project from the wall in excess of 9". There is nothing included in the subject application to suggest compliance or noncompliance with this requirement. Staff notes that compliance with this requirement will be a condition of approval for this Master Signage Permit. 3. The proposed signs shall not project from the wall in excess of 9". 4. Pursuant to Section 20 of the Sign Ordinance, all signs shall be of substantial and sturdy construction, kept in good repair, and painted or cleaned as necessary to maintain a clean, safe, and orderly appearance. (0 Freestanding Signs Section 9(h) states that free-standing signs along Dorset Street are to be located in a sign corridor that begins adjacent to the road Right -of -Way and runs sixteen (16) feet from the edge of the Right of Way toward the building face. In those instances where dimensions do not provide for a two (2) foot setback from the Right -of -Way before a sign support post can be located, it is permitted to erect a centered single pole mounted sign of which the road side edge of the sign is directly outside the R.O.W. line. A free-standing sign is not a part of this application Section 9(h) states that free-standing signs in the Dorset Street/City Center District may not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in overall dimensions and may be no higher than twelve (12) feet, measured from the average finished grade at the base of the sign to the highest point of any part of the sign structure. A free-standing sign is not a part of this application. 372 Dorset Street Design Review Application DR-04-10 Page 4 of 4 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Master Signage Permit #DR-04-10 conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items above. SF �03.3 SIG,N*A*RANA 3073 Williston Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-863-6233 • Fax 802-863-6324 Bob®signaramavt.com Application for Master Signage Permit for Dorset Communication, LLC Project Location - 372 Dorset Street, So. Burlington Tax parcel ID # Owner of record - Dorset Communication, LLC, Ed Flanagan 169 River Street, Montpelier, VT 05602; Phone 802-223-2396; Fax 1-802-223-1520 Applicant / Contact Person — Bob Diaco, SIGN-A-RAMA; 3073 Williston Rd, So. Burlington; 863-6233; Fax 863-6324. Applicant is not a present or future tenant. Applicant is seeking approval to: Replace two sign faces in existing internally - illuminated sign cabinets. Building is located very close to Dorset Street and currently has an internally illuminated sign cabinet on the north (facing Williston Road) and south (facing Kennedy Drive) sides of the building. The new owner wishes to continue to use the existing cabinets in their present locations to identify two of his tenants. Both proposed signs will have similar light intensity to the pre-existing (Audio Video Authority) signs. 10 .0 S4 Z Sz 0 The walls to which the signs are attached are each 18'h x 52'w = 936 sq. ft. The owner is entitled to have b%&sq ft of wall signage on each facade. The signs are presently installed at a height approximately 14'. The building has no freestanding sign. The sign on the north facing side will have the Alice logo produced using an opaque mustard yellow background and red text/graphics. The proposed 26.5 sq ft. sign will remain in its current location. The sign on the south facing side will have The Point logo produced using an opaque white background with black and mustard yellow text/graphics. The proposed 15 sq ft. sign will remain in its current location. The proposed signs will be constructed using opaque vinyl, translucent vinyl and acrylic. The attached color rendering shows what the two proposed signs will look like during daytime and night hours. The backgrounds of both signs will be opaque with only the logos appearing lit at night. The color schemes are dictated by the corporate logos of the two major tenants and the yellow has been modified to appear consistent between tenants. The colors used are red, mustard yellow, and black. Robert Diaco — SIGN-A-RAMA October 28, 2004 Attachments Daytime Appearance 45" x 84-1/2" cabinet The,'oaQ point True Music Diversity 36 x 60 sign cabinet Nighttime Appearance 45" x 84-1/2" cabinet 36 x 60 sign cabinet { 5 VARIEGATED DOGWOOD PRUNE EXISTING RED OAK k — CLEAN OUT AREA FOR MOUNDED BED FOR DETAILS SHEE PLANS BY CREATIVE LANDSCAPING STORAGE I (2700 SF) g Z5 4 3 2 l 4 14.10' ♦-11 ONE WAY 21.84' - + � i I 7 8 9 Wil 16.12' ao COMMON DRIVEWAY I W Z D Y Z 0_ H Q z O 0 F X i 1�1� L] ASTILBES — HOSTAS 3 DIABLO NINEBARK CHERRY BOULDER (TYPICAL) 3 DENSE YEWS COREOPSJS F F,SAGE MUGO PINE PHLOX MOUNDED BED OFFICE\STUDIO (43^0 SF) Q(NIC) POTTED ANNUALS F- w w F- W 0 m 0 0 J J Z 0 Q U_ Z c� O U I` W w O 0 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. Permit Number DR - CITY OF SOUTH BTJRLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board, 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): 11 Design Plan Approval / Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fw.-, - 1601 R4/ EK60')- (oz ' ) Z'L? .13',4 1ZF'k' ?(JL-ZZ-1 -I 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) �07-1 tA'YA7xL V S-- &.Jj"4a— 1,4— oNe3 .,f61e1-111w1-'n1q 4) CONTACT PERSON (Marne, mailing address, phone and f'w,- #) 1.\ AA " , L4- 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TA)( PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement. or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. '. , - - .. I A - .A 1) I't s4, - W10V q Id - o'0xA4"4' I'RI(J � s I k e qi W = a6 ". 6o" The information listed on E.--rchibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form.. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I " x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submit -Led. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. /2- S16PATUAE'OF APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMSSION: I have reviewed this design review application and Find it to be: 0 complete 11 Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 9 March 29, 1983 Ivir. Nigel Muc k low Carpet Center 372 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Mucklow: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjust -rent has granted your request for a zoning variance. The Board will issue formal findings at a later date. This office will issue a certificate of occupancy upon your request. If you have any questions don't hesitate to call nx--. Very truly, Richard 4Janj, Zoning Adgy6pistrative Officer MUCKLOW 372 Dorset Street Area zoned C-2 District Section 12.102 permits two of the uses (clothing and .carpet shops Section 12.219 permits third use under conditional use approval - use proposed storage and distribution facility. (Vt. Specialty Products) Multiple uses - Section 19.652 1) retail carpet - 2232 square feet storage area for carpet 2141 square feet plus 649 square feet 2) Clothing store - 1303 square feet 3) specialty - storage area 649 square feet Indicate north DATE 9>7� —JOB cO I - =--., Mimi 4, G 0 RIarch 14, 1983 Mr. Nicel Mucklow 372 Dorset Street South Hurlinqton, Vermont 05401 !,\-ar Mr. Aucklav: Be advised that the South BurIlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Hall Conference Rocxti, 575 Dorset Street on ,Nbn(:I-iy, March 28, 1983 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoninq variance. Please plan to attend. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Paninistrative officer M,I/'Tcg LEGAL NOTICES__ SOUTH BURLINGTON IONING NOTICE in accordance with the South Bur- lington Zoning Regulations and. Chapter 117, Title 21 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public. hearing of the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, March 28, 1983, at 5:00 P.M. to consider the following: No. 1 - Appeal of Phil McArthur seeking a variance, from Sec- tion 18.00, Dimensional re- quirements of the South Bur- lington Regulations. Request Is for permission to construct an attached 22'x21' garage with woodshed to within twenty- eight (28) feet of the northerly side vord, at 47 Barrett Street. No. 2 - Appeal of Carmine Paige seeking a variance, from'Sec- tion 18.00, Dimensional re- quirements of the South Bur- lington Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 10'xl2' addition to front of 90- roge to within twenty (20) feet of the required front Yard, at 21 Elizabeth Street. No. 3 - Appeal of Priscilla LePage seeking a variance, from Sec- tion 19.00, Non -conforming uses and structures and Section 19.652 Multiple use of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest is for permission t0 con- vert on existing dwelling unit Into a beauty shop and pro- fessional office, existing build- ing and lot are non -conforming to dimensional requirements, at 40 Patchen Road. No. 1 - Appeal of Nigel Mucklow seeking a variance, from Sec- tion 19.652, Multiple uses and Section 12.219 Conditional uses of the South Burlington Regu- lations. Request Is for per. mission to Occupy existing structure at approximately 1300 square feet as a retail clothing store and 650 square feet for storage in conjunction with a carpet center, at 372 Dorset Street. Richard Word, Zoning Administrative Officer March 12, 1983 NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BCNARD OF ADJUSTMENT -JName, address and telephone # of applicant L+ 1% "i v1 i a 1 V i y 5. - ,P- to rJ C-F To ,- OS y.4 1 21.E K hl i �t nny C t,o,.l Name, address of property owner (� �_-7z >ooz-�ji�-7 :5-r So. r73()v?�L 054,2 Ci;;3 G 4°JProperty location.and description _3^72 ro,000 i)N1.o6,�,c� 5 /rt�'j m W'11 &' 5t%>40.,C� I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date i nature of Appellant Do not write below this line --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: Appeal of seeking a „.�°i�-w c.t from Section / y ; 8 ; '„N ''' e�e;�. � L., .�-• �.-.aG.wt...�'.� of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to a 47 rC°1 �i,-.r..�.r, �.. „�,�•, , ate'" 3 7 � New England Floor Coverir , 372 Dorset Street, South Burlir bn, Vt. 05401 'Phone 658-9336 Sib , t>ves&4- Sty so. ��PW M K. Wed jamtA.r) a�`,�> 1 eAe & be, a v i�st4 , ttr4 kz&, 1N az6vrvj VA, vwn cep okvWW b,& ca v\,eAd YVC,✓(.LpV\) NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant Name, address of property owner Property location and description I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative o.fficer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line ---------------------------=----------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on _ Monday , January 10, 1983 at 5a00 P.M. (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: #1 Appeal of Nigel Mucklow seeking X approval , from Section 12.20 5 Conditional uses and Section 19.65 Multiple uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to occupy an existing structure as a real estate office, carpet center and automotive protection service at 372 Dorset Street. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer fk,ceiribe r 24 , 1982 NIGEL MUCKLOJ 372 Dorset Street Area zoned C-2 District Section 12.20 Conditional uses subsection 12.225 - automobile service Section 19.65, Multiple uses sub section 19.651 (more than one use per lot) - review under section 19.652 conditional use proposed uses 1) real estate office (1435 square feet) 2) carpet center (2100 square feet) 3) automotive protection service (2790 square feet) 4) storage area (649 square feet) lot 100'x200'= 20,000 square feet required 40,000 square feet no major alterations required former uses: retail shop d.b.a Kids Korner and Rusty Jones - automotive protection A G E N D A South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment City Hall Conference Room 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont Regular Meeting @5:00 P.M. January 10, 1982 1) Appeal of Nigel Mucklow, seeking approval from Section 12.00, Conditional uses and Section 19.65, Multiple uses of the zoning regulations, request is for permission to occupy an existing structure as a real estate office, carpet center and automotive protection service, at 372 Dorset Street. 2) Minutes of 12/27/82. Respectfully submitted, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Bur- lington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adlustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, January 10, 1983, at 5:00 P-M. to consider the following: NO. I Appeal of Nigel Mucklow seeking approval, from Section 12.20, Conditional uses and Section 19.65 Multiple uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to occupy an exist- Ing structure as a real estate of. fice, carpet center and automotive protection service at 372 Dorset Street. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer December 24_1902 December 27, 1982 Mr. Iigel Mucklow 372 'Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mir. Mucklow: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the C-ity Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, January 10, 1983 at 5:00 P.M. to considrr your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this heariing. Very truly, Richard ward, Zoning Administrative Officer F41/mcg NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 4 Name, address and telephone # of applicant Ni qE:L M L)C IK LUv J .3 7 2 DOKSG-7 ST, 50. 9LAC_ _I 6f r-,i 6 5s G(33& %Name, address of property owner MV G✓ LO'VV 372 009,S_T ST 6 (516 g336 Property location and description -3%2 f>o2SI�_-T S?,, i S-r02.y , \r400D 17QAI—lE SirLJGTUrza ,APAwx 6,974 sq,R OF rT205;S FL40Z ArzI�:A ;WI TO 2 corIt-iCR- ,kL owo'-, I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. / - / 0 -4-3-9 '4_N_VT'6) 41"atIC4 Hearing Date ignature of Appellant Do not write below this line ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, onference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on ,1 ?�AJA e,,/ , at , (day of week) (mono and date) time to consider the following: Appeal of c,. seekingp� � from Section Wt4M of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to `$L f z,�. DATE �'j Indicate north ti LU Z 5 s 117,1 �z -7io S f i 'i _ SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday , January 10 1983 at 5:00 P.M. (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: #1 Appeal of Nigel Mucklow seeking approval from Section 12.20 ) Conditional uses and Section 19.65 Multiple uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to occupy an existing structure as a real estate office, carpet center and automotive protection service at 372 Dorset Street. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer December 24 , 1982 .N'o%iTLvr 16, 1983 Nigel Muck low 372 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Nigel: Be advised that your request for a variance has been granted by the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The Board will. issue formal findings at a later date. This office will issue any permits necessary upon your request. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call are. Very truly, Richard ward, Zoning i0ministrative officer RW/mcg New England Floor Cover!r ) 372 Dorset Street, South Burlir an, Vt. 05401 'Phone 658-9336 Mr. Richard ''Jard Zoning Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 October 12, 1983 Dear Mr. dard : I Nigel Mucklow owner of 372 Dorset Street am applying for a general variance. This would include businesses generating low volumes of traffic. Typical examples would include : insurance sales or professional offices, and speciality retail/service enter- prises. Please contact me with any further questions. Sincerely, Ni l Mucklow NINI/d e 1 No Text NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant N f( E L M U C K I—D") _ 1 L Name, address of property owner Ats A _9 \J Property location and description - s�� ✓i--Ai,ICoc 1'4E)< J rcJ I�K,A,,KE i SArJ .&A 1CC-10- -✓ I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. NO) Hearing Date ignature of Appellant Do not write below this line ---------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on ��i% at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: Appeal of J seeking a from Section Burlington Regulations. b of the South �� y Request is for permission to ��.�.-�� Y e No Text ci .as Z .Nit11 rFen �iat� ; .r'rccor 7,0ainA`., q4 V 0 \�d1 GF°Pter \li �ioSltOwix b000 aihae So 9..rd �°Ad\esftFre 5Con- .. pYrSOw °�oaj,q.a_.d"n.q,ocy�Oo�pOMSf}. ces,O.ret �blrc heorio.m4t5l^'jw �1m�tconde 'ocs0o at 5' \ P oS' o°oNeOk� 0.e M kioQ ° M .9%R0 „O �c°PY 19.65 0.d o0 �IMis a°p1 o P ��p3 5o°tht b S^r �'ddia0 r;m0 0 ex�sr 9 ° coat upon s, a roPhic s,% ill, con Storo0° or .°aire posy°o5 eet. ShpOrwr at "� �a\r4m� 5°droo M1 PPP c vor•OM0, *1 u1o' ekMO m°osrooar°1in0tOa 'SS. W Sorrtf' for P°rm� d0'k to 1 ohs ReQrro`Z01 �h `; SaSeet cons on widr`a...AhedX„ad.. k- the�ett boy A , p.lmer w- ° Boa Aa�y mo00% d'es the i Coad Red to oc.. •� ZO,e.rlio0toa 'wioP t bw%drocY Q°Ot't istia0 AON1e 8°Mo' ' '.. oa °% ov%oco war o IL It, cV�s of 20 l of O ay ots5�ti� Mq APP�t.otterce kom res of 4 .ss. voriaaht ,°f sR 10 a S. \00 \ 11 ~grerGoOrsiroa to0 feet, lira So"tth•is for Ph ht of 5 R OS E .P sweet. `ems 1 Sw of NAY °t Mw pincer Com�k�� ocKrn^° „Oa 16\ q'651 t� Re0 orn dion gr.rlin0 is' ,.,.. S00 0� the toe h it. uso s ,to. o 55, po�c ogre w complex �. W fb t,00 to ( 9, oSfr° ° s oPPor.t°h%r\y tom a0 d Hioesp�p0Itt° s�p°kr0 D of tere 870 MMrP ol�c°Yorsodf °s0o°Kotrop opy . aos e�iogO °Sn°oA, °lAkdfor r coa�ryet nod chulKex oS of arc r N Sweets- �oodko� 5 AP� rtrfl °o°f `N °f o0°°t s�p5 G� yteasrO.^�s. Sectse'ti°oe.r9M-•^q��to,,,^�� to to oa fire sOi�. W; I St l°p 11a Rer\°O o q\ k�srrt i�wo°1 of dte0 Forr°10a front os 0 `/Pr°d' -� IComoro tore, \ of trr��M Seb-*c,- N8 At'�°pProtror'°l `rs°es °b 0 s 9.0 Coodr .,tens s. tioo q 0. .n Ra. Sion 6, c°n don �AmOt petrol Sion cN°st o q9 h35 H.x y\SN A>rP°rt o� °"aw"RatOd of 1oc ord, pork- RK Offfc°r Ad�mistrad'r ZopmAq 1963 0-1-12 October 31, 1983 Mr. Nigel iMucklow 372 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Mucklow. Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustient will hold a public hearing at the municipal offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on 1',bnday, November 14, 1983 at 5:00 P.m. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this hearing. Very truly, Richard Waid, Zoning Administrative Officer Yw/mcq DESAUTELS REAL ESTATE, INC. Commercial Division Route 2A COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 878-5371 To ILID,Ds' KS LETTER Date Subject I S i t^ /vim _ _ Dv) v ' 0' � '"� �� ' ...!_ ic� i /.l 7 ; i �; , i J 4 -) t i 7L-1 Lj �./,'r� t-' C� G i �- � � � �' 4?_. n ✓.�-- C' ❑SIGNED Please reply ❑ No reply necessary No Text Ltw4L NOM S j SOUTH 6URLINGTON ZONING NOTICE �In accordance with the South Bur- lington Zoning Regulations and I Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the 'South Burlington Zoning Board of . Adlustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, October 25, 1982, at 5:00 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Appeal of John A. Russell seeking a variance, from Sec- tion 13.00, Non -conforming uses & structures & Section 11.15 Multiple uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest Is for permission to con- vert basement Into office area at 1161 Williston Road for a to- tal of 1348 square feel, occupy same as real estate office, con- vert oaroge Into office area of 5 Mary Street for a total of 1560 square feet, for Office use, both structures are non -conforming to the dimensional and area re- quirements. 2. Appeal of Raymond & Barbara Phil Ilps, The Learning Center seeking a variance, from Section 13.00, Non -con- forming uses and structures of the South Burlington Regu- lations. Request is for per- mission to construct a 12'42'8 addition to a building. which is located within the required set- back of Interstate 189, located at 40 Farrell Road. 3. Appeal of Joseph & Jeanette Letourneou seeking a variance, from Section 7.00, Permitted uses, Section IMS Multiple use of the South Burlington Regu- lations. Request Is for Per- mission to occupy an existing apartment house as 0 church and office for Unity of Shei. burnsand continue with one apartment, also requiring a variance from Section 11.25 propose to construct a portion of the parking area within the required set -back from In- terstate 189, at 46 Swift Street. 4. Appeal of Norman Pecor & John Larkin seeking approval, under Section 8.10, Conditional Uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for permission t0 construct a 60'x100' structure, proposed use, automotive sales & ser- vice, on a lot containing ao- proximately 80,000 square feet, lot No, 2, on Bartlett property, IBM Shelburne Road north of Allen Rood. No. S. Appeal of John Harrison seeking a variance, from SeC tion 7.00, Permitted uses & Sec- tion 11.15 Multiple uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for permission to construct a strocture contain - Ina approximately 26,000 square feet, occupy area as lease space for a variety of uses, on a lot containing 2.6 acres, located on Holmes Road easterly of Chlttenden County Volkswagen. No. 6. Appeal of Dan Mandel, agent for David Brassard seek, Ina a variance, .from Section 11.15, Multiple uses and Section 8.10 Conditional uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for permission to occupy an existing structure as an Insurance office and carpet center Including .storage In rear garages, at 372 Dorset Street. Richard Word, Zoning Administrative Officer October 9. 1982 October 12, 1982 Brassard Automotive,$ervice 1255 Williston Road ,South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re. Zoning variance Dear Sir; Be advised that the cbuth Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the (Aty Offices, Conference RwTi, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, October 25, 1982 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your reque-st for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Aciainistrative Officer Rfi/mcg October 12, 1982 Dan Mandel 4 Laurel Hill Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning variance Dear Mr. Mandel: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Rom, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, October 25,JM at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend. Very truly► Richard Warr), Zoning Administrative Officer FW/IrCq NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant Name, address of property owner 5�/� �Sr� %�� U �� K� ; 0C ��✓, c cS Property location and description 3 ? Z �Do C S'E'-r -_z, I U sE75 C /:)l�P� S��c S �- S%a �{ isG D,�j4C,C I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: Appeal of �. seeking a from Section of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to 1 O'er .4 1. , ;7 November 22, 1977 Ada a -,,-af fler 699 Pin3 Street T3urlington, Ve-i:rx�nt 351-01 C Dear 3rassar3: -,-quest =3 zoning va-itinc--3 and conditinnt'l Be aivisod t1"In-It Your - t, nr�OV3d as r.asent-d to the 'I'-Ioning ccn--d o:f Z71dj nr 21, 19-17. The Z�aor�raj findings at raid -will issue ;. ... if you have any questions feel free to contact me. vary truly, Richard 'Jard Zoning -7 - �,d-,-Anistrativ3 Ofiicer mw/mcg ...... . .... I .,4.Z.a _42 VIPAYk06 �0,L:501lq a ti k(:� tz-v 3 vj ask s, k1 WAX i u� 33oc s Fr 1 rK ._ �� %C C' '* BNTkkYLA .22td S Fr• Area is zoned B.P.D. D Existing use - Thrift Shop is per tted Propose to expand area of thrift sd - ) tc Second use proposed - automotive recondi section of building, approximately 7P4 s area and 2240 square feet shop area.�t This use is conditional use under Sectic Section 11.15 Multiple uses - no more tT oximately 3,500 square feet oning shop to occupy rear are feet for auto reftrbish 9.10 - one use per lot 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTKENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use7 variances decision of administrative officer. Property Owner_ /�A (�� /%�J, ��p� % ,toss-9 -'J Property location & description 3 2 �? o .c s r• Variance of Section number (title of section) Basis of appe I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and the hearing. G/ Hearing Date Sio e of Appe lant SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117,Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on day of week following: 11 �1 Appeal of at month and date) time) a IAA,,#,,, } _� from Section �!� J IJr� ,��►^-° of the South Burling ton Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission to d to consider the seeking APPEAL TO THE SOUTH BURLINGTON BONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUBJECT: PROPOSED USE OF FACILITIES LOCATED AT 372 DORSET STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT. OWNER: BRASSARD AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INCORPORATED 699 PINE STREET, BURLINGTON, VERMONT ZONED: BUSINESS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REQUEST: 1. VARIANCE - DUAL USE - SECTION 11.15 2. APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE - SECTION 8.101 PRESENT TENANT - COUNTRY MANORED THRIFT. SHOP OWNER, CAROL BRASSARD OCCUPIES FRONT PORTION OF BUILDING PROPOSED SECOND TENANT - AUTOMOTIVE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. OWNERS, ART FONTAINE & MAURICE REID TO OCCUPY REAR PORTION OF BUILDING LISTS OF EXHIBITS a. BUILDING AND SITE PLAN b. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS - AUTOMOTIVE PROTECTION SERVICES INC. C. DESCRIPTION OF COUNTRY MANORED THRIFT SHOP 1 THE BUILDING AT 372 DORSET STREET WAS ACQUIRED BY BRASSARD AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES AS THE RESULT OF A BUSINESS ARRANGEMENT WITH THE PRIOR OWNER AND TENANT. OUR PURCHASE OF THE BUILDING WAS A COLLATERAL ARRANGEMENT WITH THE FORMER TENANT AND OWNER AND WE HAVE ACQUIRED IT BY DEFAULT, NOT BY CHOICE. AT THE TIME WE PURCHASED THE BUILDING, IT WAS OUR FULL INTENT THAT THE TENANTS WOULD REMAIN THE SAME AND THE PURPOSE OF THE BUILDING ALSO REMAIN THE SAME. IN THE PAST, THE BUILDING HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BOARD FOR A DUAL USE AND AS MANY AS THREE BUSINESSES HAVE OPERATED SIMULTA- NEOUSLY FROM THAT LOCATION. THE BUILDING IS IDEALLY SUITED FOR TWO SEPARATE OPERATIONS. THE FRONT PORTION OF THE BUILDING IS SUITED FOR A LOW TRAFFIC RETAIL OPERATION, SUCH AS THE THRIFT SHOP THAT PRESENTLY OCCUPIES THE FRONT. THE REAR PORTION OF THE BUILDING CONSISTS OF A WAITING ROOM, OFFICE AREA, AND A LONG, NARROW GARAGE AREA. THIS REAR AREA, BECAUSE OF ITS CONFIGURATION, IS DEFINITELY SUITED FOR AN AUTO SERVICE TYPE BUSINESS. THE PECULIAR CONFIGURATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE BUILDING SEVERELY LIMITS THE PROSPECTS FOR THE TYPE OF TENANT THAT WE CAN PRACTICALLY ACCOMMODATE WITHOUT DRASTICALLY CHANGING THE STRUCTURE. MY BROTHER AND I HAVE SPENT THE LAST FOUR TO FIVE MONTHS EXPLORING THE BEST POSSIBLE USE FOR THE BUILDING AND HAVE ATTEMPTED TO FIND A SECOND TENANT TO OCCUPY THE REAR PORTION, THAT WOULD BE COMPAT- IBLE WITH THE THRIFT SHOP OPERATION AND BEST SUIT THE NATURE OF THE BUILDING AND LOT. WE FEEL THAT AUTOMOTIVE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC., REPRESENTS THE BEST POSSIBLE USE OF THE UNRENTED PORTION OF OUR BUILDING. THIS USE ALSO REPRESENTS THE MINIMUM VARIANCE IN ORDER TO ALLOW US TO UTILIZE THE STRUCTURE. 2 SEE EXHIBIT "A" (SITE PLAN AND BUILDING LAYOUT). MR. MAURICE REID OF AUTOMOTIVE PROTECTIONS SERVICES, INC., WILL EXPLAIN HIS PROPOSED OPERATION. SEE EXHIBIT "B" (DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS --AUTOMOTIVE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC.). INASMUCH AS THE BUILDING ALREADY HAS BEEN APPROVED BY YOUR BOARD FOR DUAL USES IN THE PAST, AND THAT SECTION 8.101 B.P.D. ALLOWS FOR AUTOMOTIVE SALES AND SERVICE TYPE BUSINESSES, WE ARE REQUESTING A DUAL USE VARIANCE AND APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE. THIS PROPOSED USE OF THE BUILDING COMPLIES WITH SECTION 13.10 CONDITIONAL USES AND MEETS ALL OF THE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 13.101 THROUGH 13.105. 13.101 -- WE FEEL THE PROPOSED USE DOES NOT IMPAIR OR AD- VERSELY AFFECT THE CAPACITY OF EXISTING OR PLANNED COMMUNITY FACILITIES. BOTH BUSINESSES ARE LOW KEY OPERATIONS AND DO NOT USE A GREAT DEAL OF WATER, ELECTRICITY, ETC. 13.102 -- THIS PROPOSED USE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT OR CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA. THE LOT IS BORDERED ON THE NORTH SIDE BY HOLSUM BAKERY AND THE REAR BY THE PIZZAGALLI CONSTRUCTION CO. AND ON THE SOUTH SIDE BY THE POWER LINE RIGHT OF WAY. THERE ARE OTHER AUTOMOTIVE RELATED TYPES OF BUSINESSES ON THE STREET AND IN THE AREA AND A NUMBER OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT BUSINESSES, ETC. THE AUTO SHOP WILL NOT BE A NOISY OR UNATTRACTIVE OPERATION. ITS PLACEMENT AT THE REAR OF THE LOT INSURES THAT IT WILL NOT BOTHER ANYONE. (NOTE: MR. STANLEY LONGWAY, MANAGER OF THE HOLSUM BAKERY, HAS ASSURED ME BY TELEPHONE THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE OPERATION OF THIS BUSINESS.) THE OPERATION OF THIS BUSINESS WILL NOT CHANGE OR ADVERSELY AFFECT THE APPEARANCE OF .THE BUILDING WHATSOEVER. 3 13.103 -- WE FEEL THAT THIS PROPOSAL WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT TRAFFIC ON DORSET STREET. BOTH BUSINESSES ARE LOW TRAFFIC BUSINESSES AND THE CURB CUT WE HAVE ONTO OUR LOT IS MORE THAN ADE- QUATE FOR OUR NEEDS. 13.104 -- WE ARE COMPLYING WITH ALL EXISTING BY-LAWS IN UTILIZING THE BUILDING FOR THESE PROPOSED USES. 13.105 -- WE FEEL THAT THIS PROPOSED USE WILL NOT PERMA- NENTLY IMPAIR THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF ADJACENT PROPERTY INASMUCH AS THERE IS NO WAY EITHER HOLSUM BAKERY OR PIZZAGALLI, OUR ONLY TWO BORDERING NEIGHBORS OTHER THAN THE POWER RIGHT OF WAY, COULD DEVELOP IN OUR DIRECTION. THE PROPOSED USES OF THE PROPERTY WILL NOT BE HARM- FUL TO TH PUBLIC WELFARE OR CHANGE THE NATURE OR CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBOR,�AS WE COVERED IN SECTION 13.102. IN REFERENCE TO THE FIVE CRITERIA LISTED ON PAGE THREE OF YOUR APPEAL APPLICATION, PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: CRITERIA NUMBER 1 -- WE FEEL THAT THERE ARE EXCEPTIONAL PHYSICAL CONDITIONS PECULIAR TO OUR PARTICULAR PROPERTY. A. THE BUILDING IS SEVERELY CUT UP AND BY ITS CONFIGURATION LENDS ITSELF TO TWO SEPARATE OPERATIONS. THE FRONT PORTION IS CUT UP INTO SMALL AREAS SUITED TO RETAIL AND OFFICE SPACE AND THE REAR PORTION OF THE BUILDING IS LONG AND NARROW WITH EIGHT OVERHEAD -TYPE SERVICE DOORS AND AN OFFICE WAITING -ROOM AREA. THE PECULIAR NATURE OF THE REAR OF THE STRUCTURE SEVERELY LIMITS THE TYPES OF BUSINESSES THAT CAN BE OPER- ATED FROM IT. B. THE HARDSHIP IS THAT A SINGLE BUSINESS CANNOT BE FOUND TO USE THE BUILDING. AFTER MONTHS OF ADVERTISING FOR A SINGLE TENANT USE, NO ONE IS ABLE TO UTILIZE THE COMPLETE STRUCTURE AS IT IS. 4 CRITERIA NUMBER 2 -- BECAUSE OF THE CONDITIONS JUST DESCRIBED IN CRITERIA NUMBER 1, THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY THAT THE PROPERTY CAN BE DEVELOPED IN STRICT CONFORMITY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING REGU- LATIONS. AUTHORIZATION OF THE VARIANCE IS NECESSARY TO ENABLE THE REASONABLE USE OF THE PROPERTY. CRITERIA NUMBER 3 -- THESE HARDSHIPS WERE NOT CREATED BY US AS WE: A. DID NOT BUILD THE BUILDING; AND B. DID NOT EVICT THE FORMER TENANT (HE LEFT BECAUSE HIS BUSINESS FAILED). CRITERIA NUMBER 4 -- I FEEL THAT WE HAVE ADEQUATELY ANSWERED THIS CRITERIA PREVIOUSLY IN ADDRESSING SECTIONS 13.102 AND 13.105 (SEE PAGE NUMBERS 2 AND 3). CRITERIA NUMBER 5 -- I FEEL THAT THIS VARIANCE REPRESENTS THE MINIMUM VARIANCE THAT WILL AFFORD US RELIEF AND WILL REPRESENT THE LEAST MODIFICATION POSSIBLE OF THE ZONING REGULATIONS AND OF THE PLAN. WE ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR DUAL USE WHICH IS THE MINIMUM POSSIBLE UTILIZA- TION OF OUR PROPERTY WITHOUT DRASTIC IMPROVEMENTS AND ALTERATIONS UNAC- CEPTABLE UNDER SECTION 2-13.00 NON -CONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE RELATIVE TO THIS PRESENTATION. MICHAEL BRASSARD PRESIDENT, BRASSARD AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE$II1C. AUTOMOTIVE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. 291 ST. PAUL STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 EXHIBIT B. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS - AUTOMOTIVE PROTECTION SERVICES INC. DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY : WORK AREA CONSISTS OF A LARGE OPEN WAITING ROOM AND OFFICE AND A SEPARATE CONNECTING GARAGE AREA WITH EIGHT OVERHEAD DOORS. PROPOSED USAGE OF TIORK AREA : THREE BAYS ARE INTENDED TO BE _.USED AS AN INTERIOR CONDITIONING AREA. THIS CONSISTS OF VACUUMING CLEANING, SHAMPOOING, INSTALLATION OF SEAT COVERS AND FLOOR MATS, ETC. ONE BAY.'_WILL i BE USED FOR VEHICLE PREP, CONSISTING OF A HAND BUCKET WASH AND HAND POLISHING AND WAXING. THE REMAINING FOUR BAYS WILL BE USED FOR STORAGE AND ADDITIONAL WORI{ BENCHES, ETC. ALL BAYS WILL BE UTILIZED FOR OVERNIGHT STORAGE OF VEHICLES IF NECESSARY. (NOTE) UNLIKE A BODY SHOP, WE WILL NOT HAVE ANY CARS LEFT IN THE PARKING LOT OVER AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME. OUR BUSINESS IS CONDUCTED ON AN APPOINTMENT BASIS ONLY AND WILL NEVER BE A HIGH TRAFFIC OR A NOISY OPERATION. PROPOSED USAGE OF THE OFFICE AREA: LIMITED RENOVATION WILL BE CARRIED OUT TO PROVIDE ONE ENCLOSED OFFICE. THE BULK OF THE AREA WILL BE USED AS DISPLAY AREA FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCESSORIES SUCH AS SPLASH GUARDS, SEAT COVERS, ETC. HOURS OF OPERATION IT IS PROPOSED THAT THIS FACILITY BE OPERATED ON A SIX DAY PER WEEK, EIGHT TO TEN HOURS PER DAY, BASIS. EXHIBIT C COUNTRY MANNORED THRIFT SHOP DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS The Country Mannored Thrift Shop' s primary business is the sale of used clothing and household articles on consignment. We also carry a limited supply of new first and irregular children's clothing. We are a low traffic business; our hours are 9:00am to 5:OOpm, Monday through Saturday, and 7:OOam to 9:OOpm on Friday. We need more office and storage space badly. We also need some more display space for our merchandise. In order to facilitate this, we are planning to rent the re- mainder of the front portion of the building. We have been in business at this location since November 1, 1974. We feel that we will never require the whole building for our operation. We also feel that there will be no con- flict with the proposed Auto Conditioning Shop and our business. Sincerely, C.I. Brassard EXHIBIT C COUNTRY MANNORED THRIFT SHOP DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS' The Country Mannored Thrift Shop's primary business is the sale of used clothing and household articles on consignment. We also carry a limited supply of new first and irregular children's clothing. We are a low traffic business; our hours are 9:00am to 5:00pm, Monday through Saturday, and 7:OOam to 9:OOpm on Friday. We need more office and storage space badly. We also need some more display space for our merchandise. In order to facilitate this, we are planning to rent the re- mainder of the front portion of the building. We have been in business at this location since November 1, 1974. We feel that we will never require the whole building for our operation. We also feel that there will be no con- flict with the proposed Auto Conditioning Shop and our business. Sincerely, C.I. Brassard November 7, 1977 Midas Muffler Mr. Michael Brassard 699 Pine Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Brassard: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Hoard of adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, November 21, 1977 at 5:00 p.m. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard vlard Zoning administrative Officer RW/mcg r � �-- 2 V 10 j I 4 °` ol IN i ► 1 �- 3 ? Z DU2S T7rZL�"T 2i6H1=Away IN iN is A126A )24 P o5f'D A s D 6 eS FT STPeel w October 21, 2,974 `_,!r. Robert Pettibone c/o Country 14anored Xitc!'.,ens 372 Dorset Street South Purl inrton, VT 05401 Dear Mr, Pettibone: Be advised that the South cur .in gton '21oning Foard of Ad�ust- ment will hold a public hearin,r. at the City hall, Conference Room, 1175 Willis ton Road on 1,",cnday, November 4, 1971+ at 5:00 p.m. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend. Very truly, Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance, decision of administrative officer. Property Owner Property location & description Variance of Section _, number title of section Basis of appeal I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 91, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington. City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on , at day of week month and date time to consider the following: Appeal of•,, c ,, L+tiseeking a (name) variance from Section , ✓! .�``` of number (title of section the South Bur`l�ngton Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance, decision of administrative officer. Property Owner Property location & description rr Variance of Section number title of section Basis of appeal. I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m, at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and the hearing. Hearin Date Signature of Appellant ��'T:Y �•�.� �Y M ..® �- ----------------- i-j---�� - :i'a1 c `T hoi`:".as �e id I.cbE7 t Pe, �'t bonein r i^ s n � c: - - -; --�--I. .__ seekinc: a knaras ) variance from Section �- 17 use reguire�;enTs ^-.=rt1 1e `rI of Lhe Sou'%:': '` on,-Inz i�avula-t`-ions. cCi','v�.'� --is oT permi ss o . to operate two businesses 'Lrom one building arehouse 12 & Cct:ntry �,ianored Kitchens, '�<c ) located at J72 Lo,^set Street. P:_chard C,i:irman Zo-r:i Board of :.djustcr_� _t I FGALS SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 91, th BurlIt Burlington Zoning Boardou of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference South Burlington, Vermontonon Road,on Monday, November 4, 1974 at 5:00 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Appeal of Lucien Demers, Richard Derridinger, Agent, seeking a variance from Section 11.00; Dimensional requirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to set-off a lot containing ten point one (10.1)• acres, as a single family lot which has no lot frontage except a sixty (60) foot right-of-way, parcel in question Is south of 1545 Dorset Street. 2.. Appeal of Martin Beauvais, Richard McDowell, Agent seeking a varianceYrom Section6,o0, Permitted Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. ti. esi is for permission-t0 operate a grq�up home for no die than eight (B) aduTtslfpm a s' ie family dwelling located at 748 e untry Club Drive East. 3. Appeal of Clement J. Barber seeking a variance from Section 11.00, SDnBlurlington Zoninga south Regulations Request is for permission t( construct a 16' x 34' garage and shot to within four (4) feet of the souther) property line, at 1155 Airport Drive. 4. Appeal of Thomas Reid, Rober Pettibone, Agent seeking a variant from Section 11.15, Use requirement! Article XI of the South Buriingto Zoning Regulations. Request is fc permission to operate two businessf from one but (Warehouse 12 Country Manored Kitchens, Inc located at 372 Dorset Street. Richard A. Myette, Chairma Zoning Board of Adjustme Oct. 18, 1974 November 6 t 1974 (7ountry Nanored Kitchens, Inc. 372 Dorset Street South :.'urlington, VT 051+01 Dear Mr. Pettibone: Be advised that the South Turlington Zoning Board of Adjust- Tti,n-nt Itas Franted approval of your requo s t for a zoning variance. Your occupancy permit 311 allow a dual USE", t4"ese being Warehouse 12 and ('ountry Flanored Kitchens,ne. kny other use �,:ill requir, another hearing before the ','-"oning r3oard of ,id justment, Very truly, �.ichard ",,,"ard Zoning Adminstrative Officer RW/S August 17, 1973 i �',utomatic Canteen Company 372 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 051+01 Dear Mr. Kline: Be adviserl that your request for a side yard variance has been approved by the Zoning Board of AOjustment. A buileing permit will be issuers upon your request* Very truly, I.Nichard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer RW/M Hearing Daty % % S Advt. Date South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment South Burlington, Vermont Gentlemen: Advertise 6 days prior to meeting. Thereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following variance. I understand that regular meeting dates are the first and third Wednesdays of the month at 7:30 p.m, at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertisement shall appear as below, and I agree to pay, either now or before the ad appears, a fee of $30..00 which fee is to off -set costs of holding said hearing. gnature and dd ess Dat SOUTH BUR LINGTON ZONING NOTICE The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on day of week at to consider the following: month and date time Appeal of{'.' seeking a c name ) variance from Section ' ,':.a AI," of number (title of s ction the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. Request is for permission to ale e ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ----- --..p' C -_ ----Ar �� — ,?•.aao S ,, . July 26, 1973 Automatic Canteen Co. c/o Richard Kline 372 Dorset treet S 13 in tan 'I '05401 oath Burli V Dear -i,,r. !,line: Be advised tLat due to a lack of a quorum of ".-he ',".--n--'ng Board of Adjustment the regular meeting scheduled for 14ednesday, August lt 1973 has been cancelled and this meeting will be moved to '.,:ednesday, August 15, 1973 at 7:30 P,ri- to be held in the City Hall Conference Room. Very truly, Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer RW/J August 9, 1973 Automatic Canteen Company 372 Dorset Street South Burlington, VTI orl+ol Attention: Mr, Richard Kline Dear Mir. Kline: Be advised that the South Burl,ington Zoning Board of --,26djust- ment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room 1175 Williston Road on Wednesday, August 15, 1973 at 7:10 P.m. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Pl--ase plan to attend. Very truly, Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer MU LEGAL South Burlington Legal Nonce The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will e hold a public hearing at the Town Office Building, 1 555 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Wednesday, May 17, 1967 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Appeal of Ralph B. Goodrich, Inc., seeking permis- sion for a variance from section 8.40 (Yard Require- ments) of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. Request is to construct an addition to existing ware- house art 625 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Ver- mont. 2. Appeal of William A. Vetters seeking permission for a variance from Section 12.90, paragraph 3, of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. Request is to extend a non -conforming use by adding to present store at 40 Airport Road, South Burlington, Vermont. 3. Appeal of Thomas V. Reid, seeking permission for a j variance from Section •8.40 (Yard Requirements) of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. Request is to construct a garage at rear of lot at 372 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont. 4. Appeal of Hartley L.. Hanley seeking permission for a variance from Section 6.40 (Yard Requirements) of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. Request is to build a garage on his lot at 37 Forest Street, South Burlington, Vermont. Albert 1. Reynolds, Chairman Zoning Board of Adjustment Mao �� ....sa Iday 31, 1967 Yx, Inom Automati 372 Dora South fill Dear Fr. This is their me variance Town Klan 'ILA at r a at the ',,fr. Thomas V. Automatic Cant 372 Dorset Str South 13urlingt Dear Tr. Reid: 'M:Lis is to not of Adjustment Building, 555 Wednesday, May for a variance wou t�-�pl a fol,setting up Please plan to tend ETA 11/r-" 0 1 0 t,,7 the meeting. Very truly yours, Henry LeClair Town Manager ng Board Office nt on .r request 0) dollars UNiversity 2-0812 USTEEN WORLD LEADER IN COMPLETE VENDING AND BACKGROUND MUSIC SERVICE AUTOMATIC CANTEEN COMPANY OF BURLINGTON 372 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 /0D 94 T L NNML PLAN SHFET ADDRESS FRONT Pkori E 11 �_C,If kdt iotz s Aluminum nails on exteWr galls Siding — Bottom plate -double 2 x 4 Windows.-�oubl hung with locks Studs--- 2 x 4 16" O.0 . Overh*ad doors Corner Posts triple 2 x 4 Reinforced concrete flgor I. - Top plate - double 2 x 4 Shingle color L / Rafters --- 2 x 6 16" O.C. Service Door 2 8 x 6/8 Rafter ties 2 x 6 48" O.C. Ridge board -- 2 x 6 Roof deck--plrbkod sheathing Shingles -235 # asphalt strip shingles Insulation —asphalt impregnated. Draft Shutters and flower box Cornice --soffit-.- lx6 or lx8 - Fasia.--- lx4 - C�� 1-X.. & 1 a .-butt-aF-at Rake-- 1 x 4 Plan Approved Dry: Corner 4raeing 1 x 4 Cut in Collar ties - - - Gable braces. R