Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0000 0020 Karen Drive
Date Received By Date Application C )pletedand Received By BY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIE1.4 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Oimer of Record L. E. Farrell Company, Inc. (option) (b) Applicant L. E. Farrell Company, Inc. t __ 405 Pine Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 (c) Contact Person Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 289 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 864-0950 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS Allen Road, South Burlington 3) PROPOSED USE(S) Bottling plant and warehouse 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., # of units, floor area, etc.) 88,000 square feet 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 40-50 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings $1, 000, 000.00 (b) Landscaping $ 16,000.00 (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) $50,000.00 7) ESTI14ATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE September 1981 15 trucks (route trucks) 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 40 cars 9) P=,, HOURS) -OF OPERATION 7:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M. 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Monday - Friday July 2, 1980 d3A A A A DATE S I 'RE 0F P ICANT 1JdLe nCCt'1Ve0 by Date Application-Impleteoand Received BY BY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NLT14BER OF: (a) Owner of Record L. E.' Farrell Company, Inc. (option) (b) Applicant L. E. Farrell Company, Inc. 405 Pine Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 (c) Contact Person Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 289 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 864-0950 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS Allen Road, South Burlington 3) PROPOSED USE (S), Bottling plant and warehouse 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., #7 of units, floor area, etc.) 88,000 square feet 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 40-50 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings $1, 000, 000.00 (b) Landscaping $ 16,000.00 (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) $50,000.00 7) ESTI14ATED PROJECT COI-IPLETION DATE September 1981 15 trucks (route trucks) 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 40 cars 9) P ,•.AK HOUR (S) -OF OP ERAT ION 7 : 00 A.M. - 3 : 00 P.M. 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Monday - Frida July 2, 1980 DATE S I OF : �PPL CANT • Date Received By Date Application ( )plete3and Received LZA CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLIr'ATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Omer of Record • F, FAt etzl- t o -D'6, 1OZo* S7�9Tz S6'41?AI670AJ VT- 05-.61 86�y-dOdc7 (b) Applicant - /P T (c) Contact Person 1',y1,41P 4 40L vOozD ��g.•. Asy'� 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS ALFAI X00 3) PROPOSED USE (S) SOfT ,WKX 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., Im of units, floor area, etc.) /, *0 Z 4- WOO ft 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings v?000� 4�IU (b) Landscaping Indla'ki rh alaae (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) M clt6U / K a Ohl c- — 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COI•TLETION DATE , / i�� 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIIC (in & out) "15'0C*yl ','w �h) er 9) PEAK HOUR (S) OF OP ERAT ION 10) PEAK DAYS OF OP ERAT ION / !C° l*,� y --' E / Z DATE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Appl-i.cation F,��AL �Z_IJT 1) Namep address, and phone number off .- a. CA-iner of record Lozon Estate b Applicant Louis G. Farrell and Cristian E. Farrell (Partnership) c. Contact person James A._LampfLere." Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 289 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 (864-5711) 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development" including number of lots, units, or parcels involved as weli as proposed use (S). Lot #1, #2, #3 on property as outlined on . ............. .:% ........ . .. Z_ Drawing #1, prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. dated September 20, 1980 (revised) 3) Applicant's legal il"""Zerest in the option, etc) I property ('_Fee s5mplo, -----,.—_----Legal Option 4) Namesof owners of record of all cont-iquous propertier, list of property owners on reverse 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property sulch as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Power line Lamphere, Craig and Perry Sirloin Saloon Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 R. Genock Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 A $ C Paquette 1860 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 S & P Hershenford Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Jolly Associates Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Lutheran Church Allen Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 B. S. Irish Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 M. A. Counter Allen Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 fJ January 21, 1982 Michael Danley Kolvoord, Overton & Wilson 3 Main Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Dear Mike, Remember this one? I am trying to make this the most extended legal transaction in my years as a planner. I an, enclosing the following: 1) A copy of your last letter to me, dated September 2, 1981. I agree to the procedure you have outlined therein. 2) A copy of the proposed Easement and Bill of Sale and Offer of Irrevocable Dedication on the water and sewer lines on the Pepsi Cola property. Said copy is identical to the one you sent me in your September 2, 1981 letter, and it is sat- isfactory with the revisions I have marked therein. 3) Copies of the original Offer of Irrevocable Dedication on the street and the pedestrian easement as well as copies of the Warranty Deeds that acconT>anied same, as you requested. I hope to receive the executed documents as you described in your September 2, 1981 letter so that we may conclude this matter. Thank you. DS/mcq 4 Encls Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner KOLVOORD, OVERTON & WILSON THREE MAIN STREET ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 802-878-3346 TO: (- DATE: September 2, 1981 Mr. David Spitz Planning Department SUBJECT: 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05401 1 J Dear David: Enclosed are copies of the proposed Easement and Bill of Sale and Offer of Irrevocable Dedication on the sewer lines on the Pepsi Cola property in South Burl., VT. I note by Joe's letter that he would require a confirmatory Offer of Irrevocable Dedication for the street and the pedestrian easement. I think this would be con- fusing and what I would recommend is that I do a new Offer of Irrevocable Dedication for both running from L. & C. Farrell - Partnership to the City of South Burlington. If one of you will send me copies of the original Offer of Irrevocable Dedication on the street and the pedestrian easement as well as copies of the Warranty Deeds that accompanied same, I will have new offers and deeds executed by L. & C. Farrell - Partnership. I think it is much simpler to do it this way and it would be most convenient for me. As soon as I receive copies of these original agree- ments, I will do new ones and have Farrell sign them. Please note that I did not know the width of the sewer easement. If you will let me know, I will see that it is inserted in the Easement Agreement and Bill of Sale. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Cordially yours, Michael D. Danley MDD/dt Robert James Co., Inc. - P.O. Box 2726, Birmingham, AL 35202 Reorder No. RJH072ML SPOKES, FOLEY & OBUCHOWSKi ATTORNEYS AT LAW 184 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE P. O. BOX 966 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402 RICHARD A. SPOKES (802) 862-6451 JAMES D, F'OLEY (802) 863-2857 JOSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI ISAAC N. P. STOKES STEVEN F. STITZEL COUNSEL - August 25, 1981 Michael Danley, Esq. Kolvoord, Overton & Wilson Three Main Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 South Burlington Lozon Property A22rovals Dear Michael: Auer speaking with you and David Spitz, City Planner, I have been able to confirm the documents that yet remain to be submitted in connection with the above. I am enclosing a copy of my March 4, 1981 letter to you. These are the documents that we still need. .although it might end up being a little confusing, I'd be milling to accept the offer of irrevocable dedication shown in sub- paragraph b? of the letter if it were executed by both past and present owners. Please let me know your thoughts on the matter or forward the final document to David with a copy to me for review. Thank you. very truly yours, Joseph F. pbuchowski JFO/gmt Enclosure cc: Mr :David spitz, City Planner v�. Dictated by Mr. Obuchowski; signed and mailed in his absence. r,4 (get.. Aovk 5� V SPOKES F3 OBUCHOWSK[ ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. BOX 2325 SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 RICHARD A SPOKES IOSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI WILLIAM G. UVINGSTON Steven F. Stitzel March 4, 1981 Michael Danley, Esquire Kolvoord, Overton & Wilson 3 Main Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: South Burlington Lozon Property Approvals Dear Michael: 1775 WILLISTON ROAD TELEPHONE. (802; 863-2857 In order to complete the documentary submissions to the City in connection with the above, we still require the following: a) Offer of Irrevocable Dedication regarding sale of sewer line and easement to be signed by original owners; and b) Offer of Irrevocable Dedication underlying the supplementary Warranty Deed from the present record owners (L.E. Farrell Co.). Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please let me know. JFO/bjh cc: David Spitz, City Planner Very truly yours, Joseph F. Obuchowski 31 LAW OFFICES OF KOLVOORD, OVERTON & WILSON THREE MAIN STREET ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 TELEPHONE: 802.878-3346 PHILIP A. KOLVOORD ALAN D. OVERTON GREGG H. WILSON MICHAEL D. DANLEY Mr. David H. Spitz Planning Office City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Farrell Subdivision Dear David: February 19, 1981 Enclosed is the Right of Way and Easement Agreement which was sent back to our office for initialing. Yvonne C. Baker has initialed the corrections. If you have any further questions relative to this subdivision please don't hesitate to contact me. MDD/pg Enclosure Sincerely yours, Michael D. Danley k J SPOKES F6 OBUCHOWSKI ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. 0. BOX 2325 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 RICHAP-D A.SPOKES )OSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI WILLIAM G. LIVINGSTON Steven F. Stitzel November 12, 1980 Michael Danley, Esquire Kolvoord, Overton & Wilson Three Main Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: Lozon Property Documents Dear Mike: 1775 WILLISTON ROAD TELEPHONE (802) 863-2857 This letter is intended to partially summarize our telephone conference of November 10, 1980 and to clarify our respective positions on these documents. On the Right -Of -Way Easement and Agreement, I believe that the first full paragraph on the second page is inappropriate as to a surface easement. I believe that this language applies only to a subsurface situation. Therefore, I am requesting that this paragraph be deleted. In the next paragraph, I request that "...prevent trespass" be changed to read "...make all reasonable attempts to prevent trespass". Since the City is in the practice of taking only Warranty Deeds as to roads, I have some difficulty accepting the constraints of an Administrators Deed. Therefore, I am requesting either that the Administrator by separate document supplement the warranties to those of a full Warranty Deed or, alternatively, as you have suggested, we will accept, upon the same general terms and conditions, a Warranty Deed from the purchaser. In the Sewer Easement and Bill of Sale, we need to fill in the blanks and address the question as to whether the City is to be conveyed a pumping station, and if it is, whether this should be done by appropriate Warranty Deed. To the extent that this document appears to contain warranties, the same considerations as to a Warranty Deed apply. Michael Danley, Esquire Page Two November 12, 1980 Thank you for your assistance in this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, Joseph F. Obuchowski JFO/bjh cc: David Spitz City Planner, South Burlington LAW OFFICES OF KOLVOORD, OVERTON Sc WILSON THREE MAIN STREET ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 TELEPHONE: 602•876-3346 PHILIP A. KOLVOORD ALAN D. OVERTON GREGO H. WILSON M ICHAEL D. DANLEV February 4, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Lozon - Farrell Dear David: I am returning herewith the original Sewer Easement and Bill of Sale (and transfer return), Administrator's Deed from the Lozon Estate to the City of South Burling- ton (and transfer return), Offer of Irrevocable Dedica- tion of the street, Offer of Irrevocable Dedication of the pedestrian easement, and the transfer return to accompany the Right of Way and Easement Agreement. I have sent the Right of Way and Easement Agreement to Attorney Maley for initialing by his client and will return it to you as soon as I receive it. Cordially yours, Michael D. Danley MDD/lj Enclosures LAW OFFICES OF KOLVOORD, OVERTON & WILSON THREE MAIN STREET ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 TELEPHONE: 802-878.8246 PHILIP A. KOLVOORD ALAN D. OVERTON GREGG H. WILSON MICHAEL D. DANLEY Planning Office City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05401 Attention: Mr. David Spitz WE ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: January 28, 1981 Original Warranty Deed, L & C Farrell - Partnership to the City of South Burlington, together with Vermont Property Transfer Return. KOLVOORD. OVERTON & WILSON BY: Mica tI J March 26, 1981 Mr. David H. Spitz, City Planner South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Municipal Center Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Louis E. Farrell Company, Inc. Lozon Property Dear Mr. Spitz: The above referenced applicant requests an extension of the Site Plan approval of September 30, 1980 for his proposed bottling plant. The ACT 250 Approval required more time than anticipated and was granted December 15, 1980. Arrangements for financing are underway and construction will begin this year. Because the Site Plan Approval expires on March 30, 1981, an extension is requested. Please advise if any additional submission is required. Very truly yours, WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS, INC. �-�' Richard H. Wiemann RHW/cd cc: Mr. Louis Farrell Mr. Phil Kolvoord WIEMANN-LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS • 289 COLLEGE ST. • BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 • 802-864-0950 I� s ri October 2, 198U James Lamphere Wiemann & Lamphere Architects 289 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Gear Jim, Enclosed is a copy of the Planning Cainnission's final approval with stipulations for the L.E. Farrell Company's three -lot subdivision and Pepsi -Cola site plan. In addition to the listed stipulations please note the following requirements: 1) The revised final flat and site plan shall be accouipanieu by two complete blueprint sets (all pages) and one additional blueprint copy of the final plat (page 1 of 5) . 2) Landscaping and all other bonding arrangements must be final- ized prior to receipt of the first building permit. i Please call if you have any questions. 1 Encl Sincerely, David H. Spitz, city Planner October 2, 198U James Lamphere Wiemann & Lamphere Architects 289 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 bear Jim, i On September 30, 1980 the South Burlington Planning Cccr ission granted final approval to the L.F. Farrell Company's applications fora 3-lot suk,- division on Allen Road and for two Pepsi Cola buildings. Previously on June 9, 1980 the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustrc-ent grantees a use variance for the Pepsi Cola operation withtthe feeling that this type of light manufacturing use and storage was consistent with the intent of the �--' zoning and desired character for that area. In keeping with the required procedures for obtaining approvals in South Burlington., this 3-lot subdivision and Pepsi Cola site plan are wn- "' sistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner DS/:mcg 3 . PLANKING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23,1980 The paved area will be retained and the rest of the parking will be red crushed stone. Snow removal was discussed. It will be pushed along the edge of the hedges and tree line. Mr. Spitz felt that the hedge might have to be moved farther over in front of the diagonal spaces to leave room there — snow from that area might have to be removed. Mr. Cannizzaro said he would have to live with the possibility of removing snow 1 or 2 times a year and Mr. Walsh wanted to include that as a stipulation. Mr. Ewing felt the Commission should require that the spaces be kept open, but what was done with the snow was Mr. Cannizzaro's business. M. Mona noted that, if needed at a later time, trees could be cut to allow for more parking and smaller --plantings could replace them. This would only be done if it had to be. Mr. Ewing moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Rosario V. Cannizzaro for continued use of six apartments and two new offices as depicted on a plan entitled "Design proposal for 938 & 950 Shelburne Road", prepared by Christopher Dunn, dated September 23, 1980, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Curb openings on Shelburne Road shall be closed with �rrenite or concrete curbs. 2. New shrubs on the Shelburne Road side of the parking lot shall be located at.least 2" 112 feet in front of the parking area.- 3. A landscaping bond of $5200 shall be provided to cover removal of dead trees and lawn and driveway area improvements as well as new plantings. 4. This approval expires in 6 months. 5. Snow shall not block the parking spaces. 6. Any change in the use from the owner's real estate office and a rented low traffic intensity use office shall come back to the Planning Commission for approval. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. Mr. Mona requested that Iir. Cannizzaro inform the Commission of the use the first tenant will have. Mr. Schpucker said the applicant wound not mind doing so and would send a letter. The motion carried unanimously. Continuation of public hearing on application by L.E. Farrell Company for final plat approval of a 3 lot subdivision on Allen Road, also application by the L.E. Farrell Company for site plan approval of a soft drink bottlin- -,lant consisting of 2 buildings 78,400 sq. ft. and 9,600_sq. _ft. on lot 3 of the proposed subdivision Mr. L.--phere said this was now a 3 lot subdivision and that Pepsi would take over the eraire parcel. The Pepsi building will be on lot 3. The garage has been moved forward and the number of parking spaces has remained the same. The Fire Chief wants one of the hydrants moved. :r. Lamphere said they would tie into the CJD water line, bring utilities down the street, and construct a retention basin. Mr. 'Walsh noted that a right turn lane had been discussed before and it was noted that those stipulations should still exist. There will be 14 route trucks and 1-2 trailera in this operation, as well as about 50 enployees. The trucks will leave about 7 as and be back between 3 and 4:30pm. PLANNING C01PIMISSION SEPTE)+ ER 23, 1960 Mr. Walsh asked about the easement to Lhelburne, but he was told that it would interfere with this development and that neither side seemed to want it. irlr. Spitz stated that the Fire Chief had some rroblems with the plans and those had not been resolved yet and that the water superintendent had not received the plans yet. 7.r. Lamphere said he had talked to the Chief and the applicants had no problem with his restrictions, but that the superintendent was out of town. Mir. Spitz said he had not had time to review the street documents. He felt that his letter to the applicants of 9/11 identified these areas and that there had been time to resolve them. He recommended holding final approval until these are done. Xr. Kolvoord said the topo lines had not been correct the first time and that had held up the plans. He felt everyone involved had-work-ed hard to try to be finished on time. i:r. roger felt approval should be next week, after everything is cleared up. Mr. Ewing noted that this was not the first time topo lines had been inaccurate and he felt that when it happened it wasted everyone's time. Mx. Spitz felt everything should be finished by next week and he thought that only 1 representative of the applicants would have to be present at that hearing. iIr. Ewing moved to continue the public hearing on the application of L.E. Farrell for final plat approval of a 3 lot subdivision on Allen Road until Seatember 30, 1980 at 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mr. Walsh seconded the motion and all were in favor. Proposed changes in Vermont Planning and Development Act Mr. Spitz passed out the proposed changes. He will make comments on the changes and transmit them to the State and the Regional Planning Commission. He felt the changes could be discussed sometime this fall if the Commission wished. Other business Mr. Spitz said the sewer allocation for Sugartree had been changed from 7,000 gpd, which was a mistake, to 8500 gpd. Regarding the second Treetop entrance/exit, I-ir. Spitz went over his 9/19/80 memo on the subject. Mr. Poger went over the history of this subject. Treetops wanted 2 entrances, but the Commission wanted only 1 because its goal was to hold the number of curb cuts on Kennedy Drive to 1 per lot in order to keep that road as a through street for high speed. He noted that this second entrance was less than 1,000' from Sugartree's access. He was concerned about left turning traffic for that complex and he added that the Commission had asked from the start for 1 entrance because they have felt that is in the best interest of the city. Mr. Poger said that if there were problems caused by having only one entrance, he would not object to opening it back up, but he noted that the Commission had insisted on a particular configuration and it has not ever even been tested. He wanted'to know if the city would be better off with one entrance or two. A'essrs. Ewing and Walsh agreed that they would like the cut closed as a matter of s,rinciple, although Kr. Ewing hated to c'_ose it with the Planner, .•:ariager, and Fire Chief all wanting it open. The left turn at the office building at the corner cf :ennedy and Williston Rd. was discussed. A No left Turn sign will be ooted. :rs. I%ona moved to instruct the city to close the e-erg:ency access ( the most westerly curb cut) at Treetops. ::r. levesuge secc-.ded and the motion carried with ::r. -Ewing voting no. r:r. Jacob asked I,:r. Towne, a member of the City Council, whether that body was working on f indin€ an assistant fcr the City I�:anager. He was told that they were, and !Ir. Jacob asked whether Comm=ssion input would be requested. '-Ir. Towne DHS 9/30/80 FINDINGS OF FACT AND/OR STIPULATIONS For the Final Plat Application of L.E. Farrell Company for a 3-lot sub- division on Allen Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan -Subdivision, Lot Layout, Lozon Property", prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects, last revised 9/29/80: Stipulations: 1. All sheets shall be stamped by the project engineer. 2. The street name shall be indicated on the final plat. 3. Street lights shall be provided along the future City street. 4. Legal documents, including pedestrian and water easements and offer of dedication for the future City street, shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to issuance of the first building permit. 5. The final plat, encorporating revisions from stipulations 1 and 2 above, shall be recorded within 90 days. For the Site Plan Application of L.E. Farrell Company for a soft drink bottling plant consisting of 2 buildings on lot 3 as depicted on a plan en- titled "Site -Grading Plan, Pepsi Cola", prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere, ar- chitects, last revised 9/26/80: Stipulations: 1. A $16,000 landscaping bond shall be provided. 2. Hydrants and/or water line easement shall be revised so that hydrants are located entirely within water line easement. 3. This approval expires in 6 months. —*04 Nurlingtan +Rire Re artm at f � 575 13aract street fnut4 Nurlington, lRermont 1154111 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF September 26,1980 Mr. David Spitz City Planner City Of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road South Burlingtons Vermont 05401 Dear Dave, Plans have been reviewed by this department on the change for the water system and fire hydrants location for the Pepsi Cola buildings. The plans reviewed were marked revised 9/24/80. With the changes I feel we can give proper protection if needed. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 863-6455. Sincerely 'A xw�', s Goddette Sr. Chief i t ar� 719,�*,#� - f - " cf,4- —Q tdk �©ik R ®� Fey, F q/23/8 0/ C °� � i/ w�d�rt�e f �i �'`'• -eut w/1- }-�s No Nwo iOK& 40 1 E M O R A N D U M TO: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next Week's Agenda Items ; Date: q/19/80 3) Milot - Patchen Road Applicant is still trying to work out access details and therefore has re- quested a continuation of the public hearing. 4) Pepsi,, ause of contour difficulties applicant has shifted location of the second- ary Pepsi building resulting in the loss of one lot. Even though several items have not been completed at this time - fire, water and legal reviews - I feel that the changes should be looked at by the Ca -mission. Remaining questions from preliminary review: (a) street location is accept- able even though it does not directly line up with lightly used driveway across Allen Road; (b) sight distance at Allen Road curve is adequate by engineering standards, and tree clearing would have minimum impact; (c) pedestrian easement has been adequately located; (d) because of new site layout and shortened City street, emergency easement to Shelburne has been deleted. Other points to be resolved: (a) fire chief may want one hydrant relocated; (b) water plans have not yet been submitted to water deparment; and (c) legal documents for the street and water and o--destrian easements must still be sLbr mitted; (d) engineering sheets must be stamped by the project engineer; (e) reduction of parking spaces from 65 to 43 must be explained. 5) Beverage Store - Dorset Street Application will be reviewed only if approved on Monday by the Zoning Board. Applicant proposes to close off Dorset Street curb cut and to replace it with one on San Remo Drive. Applicant also proposes to cut off joint access to abutting property owner. Barrier design and effect on existing circulation pattern must be reviewed. 6) Cannizzaro Application will be reviewed only if approved on Monday by the Zoning Board. Property currently contains six apartments and a retail piano store. Applicant plans to replace the store with two offices including his own real estate operation. Site is fairly crowded. Parking spaces are both too few in number and to small in size - they will have to be revised. Applicant proposes to close off 2 Shelburne Road curb cuts and to replace them with one on Brewer Parkway. While the advantages are obvious, the disad- vantage is that the new entrance will cause a new paved aisle behind the building where a grassed buffer strip previously existed. Also, the Fire Chief will accept either layout but prefers one entrance to remain on Shelburne Road. 7) Other Business If time permits, several items of Ccrinission business (see agenda) are available for discussion. September 11, 1980 James Ix)xk phere Wiemann-Lanphere Architects 346 Shelburne Road Burlington, Clermont 05401 Dear Jim, I have reviewed the latest submission for development of the Lozon property, and feel that the following information is required: 'Si I I I, ) Additional identifying information: all pages dated and stwiL )ed. l IVeeodI�fe�� Y 9 i 9 r ✓ 2) Final plat application form. 3) Correction of boundary dimensions so that site plan and subdivision "lat agree. 4) i!cplanation of current survey method, i.e. accuracy of contours. qO 5) Approval by water department. N06) Ccmunication with fire chief about fire hydrant location. 7) Street name. 5(Y�J�§•` ,t. t . 8) Site details: floor elevations; walkways, if any; clear delineation of parking areas; loading docks. N0 9) Legal documents for street, water easement, aw pedestrian easuiient. Please call if you have any questions. :sincerely, David H. jpitz, City Planner DS/mcg PROTECT REVIEW SHEET I Procedure A. Application form fee v D. Review by others: fire water II Identifying Information A. ock B. Sneer's stamp C. Date scale, and north point Site location map III Existing Features C. Contours with explanation of survey method used Natural features including wooded areas IV QSurve Data, V Streets, Driveways, Park engineer school Location: proximity to existing intersections and driveways, number of entrances/exits, compatability with City street plan, connection to future developments Traffic: impact on nearby intersections and major roads C. Details: roadway widths, curves, grade, cul-de-sacs .,� eet widening reservations � E. Stre t name. F. s and si lks G. Internal access: fire control, entrance clearing, flow, access to loading areas -� H. Parking: size, number of spaces VI Lot and Building Layout A. Clustering, conformity with PUD criteria B. Orientation, use of topography, grading C. Building setbacks, spacing D. Size of lots, buildings, and units VII Water A. Full frontage construction B. Size: oversized when necessary C. Pressure for fire flows; looped systems D. Hydrants VIII Sewer A. Adequacy of existing system B. Size: oversized when necessary; also, future connections D. On -site disposal: soils information and system design r IX Storm Drainage A. Upstream and downstream provisions B. Drainage plan for building and parking areas C. Type of system; maintenance X Open Space and Recreation A. Recreation land or fee B. Pedestrian trails C. Environmental concerns: erosion, water quality XI Landscaping A. Use and preservation of existing trees B. Size, type, and total cost of new trees XII Other A. Street lights B. Off-street easements, including maintenance C. Road and building phasing D. Recording and expiration dates E. Legal submission requirements F. Follow-ups Awe ZaAflo�� 07 Z o l yr. fjt 6/0/ao: t2r YOX.3ao;/o�• tut -""� UTAOu! on a Ipad «ovl / CALL S T _,� �VA )Zkpwl watd ► 335 c� � f��a50 rqb*rf4 f -2- 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sewerage, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. This is believed to be not applicable as dwelling has own well and septic system. 7) Describe any actions taken by the Zoning.Board of'Adjustment, or previous actions by the South Burlington Planning ConTaission, which affect the proposed subdivision anteinclude dates: None to my knowledge. 8) Attach a sketch plan showing all information required under items 2 through 7 on p. 5 of the Subdivision Regulations. See attachments. (si naty, e applicant or contact person FOR OFFICE USE date • date - submission of application and sketch plan to administrative officer - this proposal is classified as a major or minor subdivision - application deemed complete - proposal tentatively scheduled for first Planning Commission meeting c Confirmed For MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Nanager Re: Next Week's Agenda Items Date: 8/19/80 4) Pepsi . 1. If City is to maintain storm water filters, the area should be deeded to the City. 5) Dorset Street -Beverage Store 1. Site drainage details must be furnished for review. 2. Existing curb cuts shall be closed by constructing concrete curbs. 3. Snow storage area should be provided. 6) Cannizzaro 1. Curb openings on Shelburne Road shall be closed with granite or concrete curbs. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda Date: 8/14/80 2) DeForge. See City Manager's meio. Note that the 7% grade is considerably below the maximum City standard for a minor street (10%). 3) Pepsi. Applicants have run into topography problems on the pepsi lot. They will appear at the meeting to explain the situation but will not be requesting any approvals. 4) Treetops. Kevin Killilea, president of Treetops Association, called to say they will be installing a break away device across the emergency access. 5) Lang. Applicants own a total of 121 acres on the west side of Dorset Street approx- mately 4 mile north of the Shelburne line. Two ten -acre lots are proposed with frontage on Dorset Street, and a future right-of-way has been left to serve rear land. The property is crossed by both pedestrian trails and proposed City streets, as shown on City planning maps. 6) Milot, Patchen Road. (1) ACCESS. Right-of-way narrows to 24 feet at one point, insufficient for a sidewalk. State law requires a minimum right-of-way of 20 feet for any lot. If a lot is proposed for higher -density development, the Planning Commission must be satisfied that the narrow right-of-way is adequate for safety and overall access for the proposed number of units. For this development a 24 foot walkway plus a sidewalk should be the minimum; a full public street right-of-way with a connection to the adjacent Munson property would be more desireable. This would tie in to the corridor shown on the proposed City street map, which is best located on Munson's land. (2) LAYOUT. Entire property is 13+ acres. Proposed portion for development is approximately 3 acres, smaller than indicatedAsketch plan. The City's zoning ordinance addresses proper allocation of open space and what standards must be met to approve full zoning density for a PUD — see sections 6.302(c) and 12.002(A) (10) . Setbacks behind Verman and Wilson properties should be 3u feet. Fire chief is unhappy with long dead-end driveway and no turn -around area for easterly most A PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, August 19, 1980_, at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following: 1) Application by L.E. Farrell Company for final plat approval of a four lot subdivision, one lot containing 14.5 acres and three lots averaging 2 to 3 acres, on Allen Read. Property is bounded on the north by Allen Road and properties of Counter and Ascension Lutheran Church, on the east by Irish, on the south by Shelburne, and on the west by properties of Hershenson, S.B. Collins, Inc., Paquette and Dubrul. 2) Application by Gerald Milot for preliminary plat approval of a 53-unit condonimium project on a 13.7 acre parcel owned by Barber on Patcl,en Road. Property is bounded by properties of Melna Concrete, Verman, and Wilson to the east; Northern Terminals Inc., Gardenway, .Perkins, LaBerge, Jarvis, and Jaycee Park to the south; Lamplough to the west; and Munson to the north. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Sidney B. Poaer, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next Week's Agenda Date: 6/6/80 2) Sugar Tree Condominiums Questions were raised during Council review about adequacy of water pressure for fire service. This item will have to be resolved after input from Fire Chief and Water Superintendent. Existing pedestrian trail is located very close to the northwest of this property. Trail location should be shown on plat to ensure there is no conflict. Some parking spaces in front of garages appear a bit short (I measured 17' in front of #34 and several others). If the length of parked cars extends into the defined roadway a safety hazard could result. 3) Farrell Company and Lozon Proposal is for a new layout on a previously -approved 11-lot subdivision. Roadway would be modified and number of lots reduced. Application to Planning Commission is pending a Zoning Board decision on a use variance (light manufacturing use in a commercial district). /�CiC¢S �_f ��' ��A r✓ — �� Oc� O /, / OCR y_ / T ---p_��o� __- �. ��� _ _ __ _ __ -- _ _--- -_-__- 1 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next Week's Agenda Date: 7/18/80 2) Scanlon I 1. The 60 foot strip along the north side of lot #2 should be extended easterly to Dorset Street and shown as an easement for access to lot 1 and lot 3. 2. The master plan shows a through east -west street along the north side of this property connecting to Old Cross Road. Potential buyers of these lots should be made aware of these plans. 3. I would recommend a street, built to standards of Old Cross Road, be built and become a city street. 4. There is a drainage -way across this property (lot 3) it should be shown including a culvert under the driveway. The Engineer must check this culvert to see if it is adequate to serve this subidivison. 3) Sugar Tree 1. Sewer pipe to be bedded in 3/8 crushed stone. 2. Delete dam in drop manhole. 3. Sewage pumping station should be 3 phase power if available. 4. Gate value in lift station for auxiliary PunV use should be at a higher elevation. 5. Pump hoist must be provided. 6. Sewage pumping station controls shall include wiring the future connection of emergency warning to police station. 7. A street light should be provided at entrance. 4) Pepsi 1. Stub in manhole in Allen Road should be shown on plan. It must be so placed that it will not conflict with watermain when the sewer is extended easterly on Allen Road. 2. Curb return on Allen Road shall terminate 16 feet from center of Allen Road. Additional R.O.W. should be provided to accommodate a sidewalk at inter- section with Allen Road. 3. Sanitary sewer to be bedded in 3/8 crushed stone. 4. Road gravel loose shall be 18 inches thick plus 6 inches of sand. Material and prepavation of subgrade shall be approved by the City prior to place- ment. J 5. Site grading and control of parking lot drainage are not shown. 6. Details for construction of Allen Ibad passing lane are not shown. 7. Allen Road culvert size is not shown. 8. All comments on previous submittals for subdivision plan review shall apply. 9. Street lights shall be provided along the future city street. J 3) Sugar Tree Major issues frcm preliminary plat review have been resolved. The fire chief has approved an arrangement whereby the water system will not be looped but an additional fire hydrant will be added on Kennedy Drive to insure adequate safety. Also, street lights of the Town and Country variety have been located on the map. And the trail location has been spotted and is off the applicant's property. A snow fence has been marked on the landscaping plan to insure tree protection. A total development cost estimate must still be submitted to allow determination of the landscaping bond. Concerning potential access to the Ryan property - although such access, does not appear likely to be used, the option should be kept open. A 50' by 100' easement (up from 30' by 60') would allow construction of a City street. Wording of the easement is still being worked out. Other changes to the plat - the sidewalk should be extended to the second driveway; also, a street name should be indicated. 4) Farrell Company - (Pepsi) a) Traffic. Improvements at intersection with Allen Road include wide turning radii at the curb and a 250' passing lane on Allen Road. No improvements have been proposed for Shelburne Road intersection. State has been consulted and has responded that its normal review would be at Act 250. If the City wishes to have an additional review it must make its own request to applicant to undertake a traffic study and to provide any necessary road improvements. b) Sidewalk. The applicant has not proposed a sidewalk. c) Water system and fire protection. Previous subdivision proposal included a looped water system. At present, this proposal does not. Fire Chief feels looped system plus an additional hydrant may be necessary. Issue remains to be resolved. d) Pedestrian easement. Easement may follow CWD line, east property line or any other suitable location. Ends of easement should align with Allenbrook home easement and with an appropriate connection, if any, to the Shelburne development. e) Site plan. Details, including landscaping, drainage and utilities, are incomplete. Other questions include length of loading dock and whether setback to Counter property line is adequate (industrial rear yard requirement is 50 feet). I do not feel that site plan submission has progressed far enough to receive final approval. 5) Kranz Application for a supermarket, drug store other coarriercial spaceerestaurant, and Fotomat kiosk was approved by Ctiy Council with stipulations in January under interim zoning. Approval is valid for 6 months so applicant need not be considered under new Cl-C2 zoning. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1980 7. Sewer allotment for this project is 7,000 gallons per day. 8. Recreation fee for this project is $2200. 9. Landscaping information shall be submitted with the final _plat. 10. A sidewalk shall be indicated from the buildings to Kennedy Drive on the final plat.-�--_--------- --_—__ -_ ,r. Levesque seconded the motion. Mr. Mona asked about the easement onto the city parkland. It was felt that exactly what would be required could be indicated at final plat. Mr. Spitz noted that if the easement were extended to the Ryan land, 30' x 60' might not be the right dimensions to request. Mr. Fiona felt it would be all right to change the size of the easement, and its purpose, at the final hearing. Mr. Poger agreed that the stipulation,at preliminary plat, did not limit the Commission. Mr. Foger also said that the possibility of combining the Ryan property access here would be investigated. There may be an additional requirement made. Mr. Jacob asked if the developers objected to the use of the recreation fee for something not exactly in their area. Mr. Milot replied that he did not object to the fee being used for recreational purposes anywhere in the city. If it were used to purchase a large parcel of land, he would not object. The motion carried unanimously. Sketch plan review of application by Farrell Company and the Lozon Estate for a 6 lot subdivision layout to include 1 lot for a soft drink bottling plant, located off Allen Road Mr. Kolvoord said the land had been subdivided in 1978 into 11 lots. The Farrell company wants to buy the entire parcel and reduce the number of lots to 6. Mr. Kolvoord mentioned that they might reduce the number to 4 lots. The previous road location will be changed and they will now go under the power line and along one side of it. Mr. Kolvoord felt the traffic generated by this use of the land would be much less than the previous uses. They will have 3 tractor trailer trucks and about 12 route trucks. The plant will employ 50- 70 people. There will be a garage building for truck maintenance and storage. Mr. Kolvoord said the plan was not to sell the other lots now, but the cost of extending the sewer line up Allen Road will have to be offset by their sale in the future. The entrance road will be at the same place on Allen Road as it was in the previous plan. Mr. Kolvoord felt the trees would screen the facility from the road. If the road did extend as far as the Shelburne line, it was mentioned that the Commission might want to see some sort of emergency access planned, but Mr. Rowell said the roads on the Shelburne side did not come near this property. Mr. Kolvoord went through the stipulations placed at the last hearing on the previous subdivision. Some no longer apply. Road improvements were discussed. A 250' bylane is shown on Allen Road because of the curve in the road at that point. The Commission also had some concerns about cars coming fast down Allen Road and hitting trucks pulling slowly out of this development. The applicants said signs warning of that could be erected, and they could cut some trees on the land to improve sight distance. Vr. Mona also wanted to have large radii on the new drive so large trucks could negotiate it easily. The Commission discussed traffic on Shelburne Road waiting to turn up Allen Road. Cars will use the shoulder to pass left— ' 4. PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1980 turning traffic and the State has said that the shoulder is not adequate for that purpose. It was felt that the State should be contacted on the matter again and Mr. Spitz was asked to do so. Mr. Mona also suggested a deceleration lane on the right so trucks could pull into it before turning into the development. Hours of operation for the plant will be 7 am to 6 pm, with most workers leaving at 3 pm. Mr. Spitz felt the applicant should think about making the area a PCD if he was planning to sell the other lots . Mr. Poger asked Mr. Spitz to ask the City Attorney if the property was grandfathered, since application was made under the old zoning. Mr. Spitz did not think the grandfathering would apply to the lots themselves and he said the Zoning Board had granted a use variance for this lot. Other business Mr. Mona noted that on the June 23 Zoning Board agenda there was a request from Robert Provost for a multiple use for 1270 Williston Road. He asked that the City Council be contacted and asked how long the city would stay under the gun of what will happen on this lot before it is purchased. Mr. Poger asked Mr. Spitz to draft a letter to the Council asking them to consider buying the property before Mr. Provost multiplied the use. Mr. Poger noted that the school bus stopped in front of the emergency access on Kennedy Drive for Treetop and he did not feel that was an appropriate place to stop, particularly in light of the fact that there was a place provided for busses at the Treetop entrance. Mr. Poger also noted that Treetop had no connection with ICV any more and he said the Commission could ask the Association to close the emergency access. He asked Mr. Spitz to schedule a meeting with Treetop representatives to discuss the issue. He also asked Mr. Spitz to find out if the city could close it, what it would cost, and if the Fire Chief could run his trucks over the curb. The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 pm. Clerk fY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 ) Name '-bf Apnl -cBnit 2) Name of Subdiv_sion L. E. Farrell Company, Inc. Lozon Property, Allen Road 3) Describe Subdivision (i,e, total acreace, number of lots or units, type o= land use, include aross floor area if comm- erc i a l . ) 24. 7-9 acres, 4 lots zoned planned business development wit--- a variance for a bottline plant 4) Indicate any c=__noes to naime, address, or phone number of o,,.,ner of reco_-_-:, at•plicant, or contact person since sketch plan aoplicz t-_ Philip A. Kolvoord 3 Main Street - Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 878- 3346 5. Name, address, end phone number of: a. Engineer Krebs $ Lansing, Consulting Engineers, Inc. 3010 Shelburne Road, Shelburne, Vermont 05482 985-2827 -- — — — b. Surveyor Engineers above based on original survey by John A. Marsh, 35 South Summit St. Essex Jct., Vermont 05452 c. Attornev _ Philip A. Kolvoord 3-Main- Street, Essex Jct., Vermont 05452 878-3346 d. PlPt DL_si:- :=r Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects -_ 289 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 864-0950 1 -2- 6) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since this proposal was last before the Commission: Previous sub-divisiz:n approval was for eleven lots 7) List names and mailing addresses of o:,iners of record of all cont- f igous properties: See attached list 8) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer (s) of the preliminary map (sO ' accompanying this appli- cation: #1 - Site Plan - Dubdivisio- T2 - Plan and Profile #3 - Plan and Profile #4 - Details all dated June 3. 1980 by Wiemann- Lamphere, Architects Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, _-c. 9) Attach a preliminary map showing the following information: 1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the city. 21 Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. 3) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. 4) The names of all subdivisions immediately adjacent and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. 5) The location and size of any existing severs and water mains, culverts and rains on the property or serving the property to be subdivided. 6) Location, names and widths of existing, and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks -S- and other public or privately maintained open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. 7) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of'proposed finished grades where change of existing ground elevation will be five feet or more. 8) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. 9) Numerical and graphic scale, Cate and true north arrow. 10) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative mans of providing water supply to the proposed subdivision. 11) Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provision for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 12) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface Taoil, rock i and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; locaticn and results of percolation tests. 13) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. 14) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culv_rts which may be required. 115) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic lay- out in the field. Unless an existing street intersection is shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. 16) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 10) Developmental timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates) September 1980 - November l:-Sl 11) List the Waivers applicant desires from the re_uirements of these regulations' Zoning variance granted for bottling plant -4- 12) Attach a vicinity map showing the following: 1) All existing subdivisions, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the record owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street ad- joining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing filed or proposed streets, curb cuts, easements, huildiug lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the sub - divider's entire holding. July 2, 1980 signatur a Pli nt or co tact person care ATTACHMENT 7. List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all contigc -,s properties: A. ascension Lutheran Church .Alen Road R.F.D. #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05401 B. Bernice S. Irish 200 Allen Road R.F.D. #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05401 C. Anthony Perry c/o Sirloin Saloon Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 D. S. B. Collins, Inc. 54 Lower Weldon Street St. Albans, Vermont E. Pauline Hershenson 1834 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 F. Arthur Paquette 1860 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 G. Jack DeBrol c/o Automaster Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 H. Mathew A. Counter Allen Road R.F.D. #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05401 DHS 7/22/80 FINDINGS OF FACT AND/OR STIPULATIONS For the Preliminary Plat Application of L.E. Farrell Company, Inc. for a 4-lot subdivision3KIM Allen Road, as depicted on a 5 page plan entitled "Lot Layout-AProperty," prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere, dated 7/5/80. L6ka1 Stipulations: 1. The applicant shall comply with requirements of City Manager William Szymanski's memo dated 7/18/80 regarding manhole stubs, curbs, sewer and road construction, Allen Road passing lane, culvert size, and street lights. 2. Fire protection and water system details, including the potential need for a looped water system, shall be reviewed by the fire chief and water department respectively. 3. A 15 foot wide pedestrian easement, with connections to the proposed Allen - brook pedestrian trail and possibly, to development in Shelburne, shall be in- dicated on the final plat. applica al. U rtake a tr to provide iiitad impacts f the s div'sion on Shelbu and Allen Roa rsections. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, .July 22, , 1980_1 at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following: Final plat application of James D. and Dolores V.E. Scanlon of South Burlington Vermont, to subdivide a 49.14 acre parcel into three lots, two lots containing ten (10) acres and the third containing twenty-eight point nine (2b.9) acres. The proposed subdivision is bounded on the north by Economoy Farms Inc., on the south by Demers and the west by properties of Long, Unsworth and Nowland, parcel -, located at 1435 Dorset Street, South Burlingtori, Vermont. Preliminary plat application of L.E. Farrell Company, Inc. of Burlington, Vermont to subdivide a 24.2 acre parcel into four lots, one lot contains 14.5 acres and three lots average 2 to 3 acres. The proposed subdivision is bounded on the north and east by Ascension Lutheran Church; on the east by the properties of Counter and Irish; on the south by the Perry property and the west by properties of hershenson, S.B. Collins, Inc., Paquette and Dubrul, parcel is the Lozon property located on Allen k)ad, South Burlington, Vermont Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Sidney B. Poger, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission July 5, 1980 SOUTH PURLII"V GTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 555 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 Richard G. Carter, Chief Telephone 658-1050 October 8, 1980 Weinmann-Lamphere Architects 346 Shelburne Street Burlington, Vermont Dear Sir: The Police Department has reviewed the proposed warehouse construction for the Pepsi -Cola Bottling Company and can find no reason to object to the project at this particular time. The traffic generated by the business should not have an adverse effect on the intersection at Allen Road. Very truly yours, Richard G. Carter Chief of Police RGC:mb r Type l,) 11I5 VQ 1'.ight Distribution w � n 2 X L=J I _ 4 a a � o 4T Configurations D** Top pan interlocks with sides to provide weatherproof seal One piece multi -formed aluminum sides with an integral reinforcing B spine and a single concealed ioint + provides a very Pole bolster rigid lightweight plate with — housing strain -relief Easily -removable Silicone C* hinged door and gaskets field rotatable reflector. Flat Dimensional Data tempered glassware Cr E A t Longitudinal Section f- A--1 Extruded aluminum arm with hand -hole, cover & wire tie H14 H19 H26 A 14" 19" 26" B 7" 10" 12" C* Arm length 6" 9" 12" D "Arm height 5" 5" 8" (), Gardco Lighting Ordering Infurmation Catalog No. Size Configuration Reflector Type" Lamps Clear Bulb Lamps H1411 14" 1 1 70 W H.P. Sodium 100 W H.P. Sodium 100 W Mercury 150 W H.P. Sodium' 175 W Mercury 175 W Metal Halide H1421 14" 2 1 H1413 14" 1 III H1423 14" 2 111 H144T3 14" _ 4T III H1420 14" 2 VQ H144Q 14" 4 VQ H1911 19" 1 I 250 W H.P. Sodium 250 W Mercury 250 W Metal Halide 400 W H.P. Sodium 400 W Mercury 400 W Metal Halide H1921 19" — 2 I H1913 _ 191, _ _ 1 III H1923 19" _ 2 III H194T3 191, _ 4T 111 H192Q _ 19" _ 2 VQ H 194Q 19" 4 VQ H2611 26" � 1 1000 W H.P. Sodium 1000 W Mercury 1000 W Metal Halide H2621 26" 2 1 H2613 26" 1 III H 2623 26" 2 111 H264T3 26" 4T III H262Q 26" 2 VQ H264Q 26" 4 VQ To order please add abbreviations for ballast voltage, lamp and finish to Catalog Number. Reflector Type Primary ballast voltage (120, 208, 240, 277 or 480) Configuration Lamp Abbreviation Size Prefix H 19 2 3 120 40OMH BRA Finish 'Supplied with ballast to operate 55 volt lamp unless specified otherwise. "See Photometric Section (Indexed by Reflector Type, Configuration and Lamp). Specifications General Description: Each Gardco Form Ten H shall be a rectilinear, sharp cut-off luminaire for high intensity discharge lamp(s), totally enclosed with extruded anodized aluminum arm(s) having an integral hand hole and cover for field wiring connections; shall be rain -tight, dust -tight, corrosion resistant. The hinged reflector and lens frame assemblies shall be safely retained in the closed and open positions and shall be readily removable without the use of tools. Configurations shall be one-way, two-way or four-way. Housings: Sides shall be a one piece multi -formed aluminum assembly with an integral re-inforcing spine and a single concealed joint. Tops shall be press -formed with a returned perimeter flange that shall interlock with the housing sides to provide a continuous weather-proof seal. Lens Frame: The mitered extruded aluminum frame shall retain the optically clear, heat and impact resistant, tempered flat glass in a sealed manner using hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber and shall be equipped with concealed stainless steel latches and hinge pins. ®Copyright 1977, Gardco Manufacturing Inc. H-15M-01-777 Reflector Assembly: The segmented optical system shall be of homogeneous sheet aluminum, electro-chemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The segmented reflectors shall be set in faceted arc image duplicator patterns to achieve Types I, III and VQ distributions. Reflectors assemblies shall be equipped with quick disconnects. Lampholders shall be attached to reflector assemblies. Electrical Characteristics: Ballast type lamp wattage and rated input voltage shall be as indicated on the plans. Each ballast shall be of the separate component type capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to —20F; shall have power factor better than 0.90 and shall be one of the following: Mercury and Metal Halide Lamp Ballast Regulating Type —medium regulation auto transformer units shall provide ±5% lamp power regulation with a ±10% variation from rated input voltage. High Pressure Sodium Lamp Ballasts Regulating Type —medium regulation auto transformer units shall provide ±10% lamp Finish: Bronze anodize: BRA Black anodize: BLA (integral color process, see spec.) Bronze painted: BRP (see spec.) Black painted: BLP (see spec.) Lamp Abbreviations: Mercury: MV High pressure sodium: HPS Metal Halide: MH power regulation with a ±10% variation from rated input voltage. Component to component wiring within the luminaire shall carry no more than 60% of rated current and shall be listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 150' C or higher. Plug disconnects shall be listed by UL for use at 600 VAC, 15 A or higher. Exterior Finishes: Anodized: Each housing shall receive integral color, Aluminum Association Architectural Class I anodizing (Duranodics or Kalcolor�*) after fabrication. Specify black or bronze. Painted: Aluminum sheets shall be cleaned, etched, rinsed and shall receive a chromate acid pre-treatment followed by two individually applied coats baked at 425'F consisting of an epoxy undercoat and a final thermosetting polyester finish coat. Normal hardness shall be H-21-1 on freshly painted surfaces. Surfaces shall be free from flow patterns, streaks, blisters, craters or other surface imperfections. Labels: All fixtures shall bear UL Wet Location and I.B.E.W. labels. Gardco Lighting Gardco Manufacturing Inc. 2661 Alvarado St., San Leandro, Calif. 94577 Phone 415-357-6900 111 !Jest Street t� Essex Junction, VT 05452 a1 "� 379-6563 o STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # 4 t1Et-10 RAN DUM TO: All Parties to Land Use Application ,4C0392-A, Lewis A Christian Farrell (formerly the Lozon Estate) 3-lot commercial subdivision and construction of the Pepsi -Cola bottling facility off of Allen Road in South Burlington, Vermont FROP1: Susan Haitsma Cain, District Coordinator S� DATE: October 27, 1920 SUBJECT: Hearing Postponement The hearing for this application has been post- poned from October 31, 1990, until 11ednesday, November 5, 1980, at 3:30 Pt1, at the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, 53 Pearl Street, Essex Junction, Vermont. CC: All Adjoiners Steve Bushey SHC/tg MT. PHILO MEADOWS RR 1 Box 228 - Tyler Bridge Road 05461 CO h. HINESBURG, �Sli' 15 November, 1982 Mr. Howard I. Bacon Inc. R.W. Gratton Consulting Services, Pierson Drive, B 256 Shelburne, VErmont 05482 Dear Mr. Bacon, • you to Mr. Ward• Thank YOU for sending the copy of the letter from y You of our concern, I have enclosed a letter we received To assure y contacted when we realized from our supplier, who we immediately ac is very unusual to have' des had not survived. have* ), some of the Crabapples plants, not as great a loss as we think Wehad ltowbewalproblem better hrthe Phe asp ou and, therefore, we knew there the way they were planted. The supplier has admitted to this can see. are dead, and As soon as it is p ossible, we will check to see how many will replace as necessary. Thank you for your patience in this matter. Sincerely, MT HIL-0 MEADOWS V1I�4tA�P (802) 482-3454 S Jane von Trapp_.,,.. ' V t V, Novemb,, -,c* cDiinwct' L1UDrWenrTDV W 71 RA;.1IAA NITMSER e dart ,�.ncr�slea/ C` NEW [NGLAND NUNS E.TN FN3 ASSOC.' oild Mr. Christopher VonTrapp r?` �IS4ztz Mount Philo Meadc;•rsy�rLilN P.R 1 Box 228 ; Hinesburg VT n,9461 Dear Chris: I have been informed of the problems which you have had and are still having with the Klehmi Crabs purchased here in June., There are several possible explanations for this but your guess regarding the "short roots" is probably right on the Inasmuch7as you have been a good customer and we are sure that you have done everything possible to maintain these trees properly we will replace them for you as necessary in the Spring of 1983". -1 do not think that we will be in a position to supply an identical Crab but certainly a reasonable substitute will be available at.that time. HARDY NURSERY 5 I UCK GARDEN SUPPLIES P.O. BOX 728 Northboirough, Mass. 01532 Please. accept my apologies for any inconvenience this may have •? caused,and,feel free to contact us if there are any more problems `�"or unanswered questions. With all good wishes - BIGELOW NURSERIES, INC, .� Thomas W. Bradley,.M. .N. E /Pmg. i �9 $. i G Extruded aluminum arm with hand -hole, cover & wire ti fTf / r D'* � Tybe I, III, VQ Light Distribution ............... . Top pan interlocks with sides e / to provide weatherproof seal -- - - —�— One piece multi -formed aluminum sides with an integral reinforcing B spine and a single _ concealed ioint ' provides a very Pole bolster rigid lightweight Piz te with housing strain -relief Easily -removable Silicone C* hinged door and field rotatable gaskets reflector. Flat Dimensional Data temP eyed lassware 9 a A i Longitudinal Section A '� H14 H19 H26 A 14" 19" 26" B 7" 101, 121, C* Arm length 6" 9" 12" Dx"Arm height 5" 5" 8" Gardco Lighting Ordering Information Catalog No. Size Configuration Reflector Type" Lamps Clear Bulb Lamps H1411 14" 1 1 70 W H.P. Sodium 100 W H.P. Sodium 100 W Mercury 150 W H.P. Sodium' 175 W Mercury 175 W Metal Halide H1421 14" 2 I H1413 14" 1 III H1423 14" 2 III H144T3 14" 4T III H142Q 14" 2 VQ H144Q 14" 4 VQ H1911 19" 1 1 250 W H.P. Sodium 250 W Mercury 250 W Metal Halide 400 W H.P. Sodium 400 W Mercury 400 W Metal Halide H1921 19" 2 1 H1913 19" 1 111 H1923 19" 2 III H194T3 19" 4T III H192Q 19" 2 VQ H 194Q 19" 4 VQ H2611 26" 1 I 1000 W H.P. Sodium 1000 W Mercury 1000 W Metal Halide H2621 26" 2 I H2613 26" 1 III H 2623 26" 2 111 H 264T3 26" 4T III H262Q 26" 2 VQ H264Q 26" 4 VQ To order please add abbreviations for ballast voltage, lamp and finish to Catalog Number. Reflector Type Primary ballast voltage (120, 208, 240, 277 or 480) Configuration Lamp Abbreviation Size Prefix H 19 23 120 40OMH BRA Finish 'Supplied with ballast to operate 55 volt lamp unless specified otherwise. "See Photometric Section (Indexed by Reflector Type, Configuration and Lamp). Specifications General Description: Each Gardco Form Ten H shall be a rectilinear, sharp cut-off luminaire for high intensity discharge lamp(s), totally enclosed with extruded anodized aluminum arm(s) having an integral hand hole and cover for field wiring connections; shall be rain -tight, dust -tight, corrosion resistant. The hinged reflector and lens frame assemblies shall be safely retained in the closed and open positions and shall be readily removable without the use of tools. Configurations shall be one-way, two-way or four-way. Housings: Sides shall be a one piece multi -formed aluminum assembly with an integral re-inforcing spine and a single concealed joint. Tops shall be press -formed with a returned perimeter flange that shall interlock with the housing sides to provide a continuous weather-proof seal. Lens Frame: The mitered extruded aluminum frame shall retain the optically clear, heat and impact resistant, tempered flat glass in a sealed manner using hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber and shall be equipped with concealed stainless steel latches and hinge pins. ®Copyright 1977, Gardco Manufacturing Inc. H-15 M-01-777 Reflector Assembly: The segmented optical system shall be of homogeneous sheet aluminum, elect ro-chemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The segmented reflectors shall be set in faceted arc image duplicator patterns to achieve Types 1, III and VQ distributions. Reflectors assemblies shall be equipped with quick disconnects. Lampholders shall be attached to reflector assemblies. Electrical Characteristics: Ballast type lamp wattage and rated input voltage shall be as indicated on the plans. Each ballast shall be of the separate component type capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to —20F; shall have power factor better than 0.90 and shall be one of the following: Mercury and Metal Halide Lamp Ballast Regulating Type —medium regulation auto transformer units shall provide ±5% lamp power regulation with a ±10% variation from rated input voltage. High Pressure Sodium Lamp Ballasts Regulating Type —medium regulation auto transformer units shall provide ±10% lamp Finish: Bronze anodize: BRA Black anodize: BLA (integral color process, see spec.) Bronze painted: BRP (see spec.) Black painted: BLP (see spec.) Lamp Abbreviations: Mercury: MV High pressure sodium: HPS Metal Halide: MH power regulation with a ±10% variation from rated input voltage. Component to component wiring within the luminaire shall carry no more than 80% of rated current and shall be listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 150° C or higher. Plug disconnects shall be listed by UL for use at 600 VAC, 15 A or higher. Exterior Finishes: Anodized: Each housing shall receive integral color, Aluminum Association Architectural Class I anodizing (Duranodic® or Kalcolor®) after fabrication. Specify black or bronze. Painted: Aluminum sheets shall be cleaned, etched, rinsed and shall receive a chromate acid pre-treatment followed by two individually applied coats baked at 425'F consisting of an epoxy undercoat and a final thermosetting polyester finish coat. Normal hardness shall be H-21-1 on freshly painted surfaces. Surfaces shall be free from flow patterns, streaks, blisters, craters or other surface imperfections. Labels: All fixtures shall bear UL Wet Location and I.B.E.W. labels. Gardco Lighting Gardco Manufacturing Inc. 2661 Alvarado St., San Leandro, Calif. 94577 Phone 415-357-6900