Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0358 Dorset Street
May 2, 2018 Re: #DR-18-04 — 358 Dorset St Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Marla Keene Development Review Planner Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7018 0040 0000 1165 3055 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com &oil Southburl n ton PLANNING s ZONING Permit Number DR �_- 04 (office me cdr) APPLICATION FOR MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT / SIGN DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. Application for: Initial Master Signage Permit after June 3, 2002 5KIAmendment of Master Signage Permit 01ndividual Sign, pursuant to Master Signage Permit #DR 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) !yJ 01" X—c-' C k-,,Aw tir 6l=ScAw, L1C., 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailingn address, phone and fax #) WW1 . 34J N.w.a 57 . c; ig (alw_%, V1 0 3 FV; - 3 M- 9344 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) &kc.- Caney �- 'JiLr� ►Zs�.�� 3Yo 0QnxL1 "Sc �c-u�+ .a�,w�t�.u� osyu3 f PQa- -��yy 5a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS E,w.Lcay,1 QVea[AW010S,(.oM1 , yet q�gra �k„„Q,/rgS7g5co(tTS•c,n 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: SSt� %a,Sy ( ST , S,mxt J7 C)gn-3 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 05 "j p - 00-7,4_ 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.41o1 www.sburl.com �' 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General proiect description (explain what you want approval for): 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Sign Ordinance. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. �' I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of t}S application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge,--) .TURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: ocomplete ❑Incomplete /,(-01, 4s� 16s ministrative Offs r Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. MasterSignage Permit Form Rev. 12-2011 .#*r�,.VERMONT C State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency of Natural Resources Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED io V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective December 1, 2010 Landowners: Leo Besaw Permit Number: WW-4-0 717-1 Besaw, LLC 22 Aster Lane Williston VT 05495 Besaw, LLC 22 Aster Lane Williston VT 05495 This permit affects the following properties in the City of South Burlington, Vermont .......... __._... _ .. .............. _....... _.... ___._____._. Lot Parcel SPAN 4 Acres Book/Page#'s s o57o-oo358 [600-i�q-16566 0.53 Book: 984 Page:19 .-_........__.__._._.._.._.____............_.3................._..__.............._._.....__.._....__............_..........._.._.._-.__•__..._._........._......__......___••_•_____'_ _._?_._._.._.__.._.............._1490-00055. _ 600-188-1.6567..............._........ 0.49_._..._....W._ _Book:984 Page 19 This project, consisting of a two lot commercial subdivision, Lot 1, 0.53 +/- acres and Lot 2, 0.49 +/- acres with existing commercial buildings utilizing existing, municipal water and wastewater services (no increase in previously approved water and wastewater flows), located off Dorset Street in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. i. GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the plans and/or documents prepared by Barnard & Gervais, LLC., (Jason S. Barnard), with the stamped plans listed as follows: Title TDrawing No. Plan Date i SITE PLAN S-1 07/27/2017 - ..._....._.. ..._ ._.._ .._........ ........... ...... ..............._...._...._..______ ...... 1.2 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits PRIOR to construction including, but not limited to, those that may be required from the Act 25o District Environmental Commission; the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division; the Watershed Management Division; the Division of Fire Safety; the Vermont Department of Health; the Family Services Division; other State departments; or local officials. 1.3 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall record and index this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 1.4 Each lot is approved with the existing commercial building (Lot 1- a Retail Building with 48 employees, Lot 2 - Orthodontist Office). Construction of additional nonexempt buildings, including commercial and residential buildings, is not. allowed without prior review and approval by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. No construction is allowed that will cause non-compliance with an existing permit. 1.5 Each purchaser of any portion of the project shall be shown a copy of the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit and the stamped plan(s), if applicable, prior to conveyance of any portion of the project to that purchaser. 1.6 By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations, and permit conditions. . poFl Regional Offices - Montpelier/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable Water bapply Permit WW-4-0717-1 Page 2 of 2 1.7 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with 10 V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2.WATER SUPPLY 2.1 Lot 1 is approved for the existing connection to the water supply system owned by the City of South Burlington as depicted on the plan(s) stamped by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division. The project is approved for 720 gallons of water per day. 2.2 Lot 2 is approved for the existing connection to the water supply system owned by the City of South Burlington as depicted on the plan(s) stamped by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division. The project is approved for 310 gallons of water per day. .q.WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 3.1 Lot 1 is approved with the existing connection to the City of South Burlington wastewater treatment facility for 720 gallons of wastewater per day. 3.2 Lot 2 is approved with the existing connection to the City of South Burlington wastewater treatment facility for 310 gallons of wastewater per day. 3.3 All conditions set forth in Permit Number WW-4-0717 shall remain in effect except as amended or modified herein. Emily Boedecker, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Dated September 18, 2017 By William Zabiloski Assistant Regional Engineer Essex Junction Regional Office Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division cc: Barnard & Gervais, LLC South Burlington Planning Commission Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety ®fie south a--4 i n PLANNING & ZONING September 5, 2017 Leo Besaw 22 Aster Lane Williston, VT 05495 Re: Minor Lot Line Adjustment Approval #AD-17-02 — 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Besaw: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Administrative Officer on September 5, 2017 (effective 9/05/17). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the final plat plan must be recorded in the land records (in mylar format) within 180 days (must be submitted to me in time for recordina along with a $15 recordina fee by March 4, 2018) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Raymond J. elair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com �1 southourlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number AD -- (office use only) APPLICATION FOR MINOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review by the Administrative Officer. 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Besaw LLC. 22 Aster Lane. Williston VT 05495 Tel: (802)343-8045 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #) Vol. 984, Pg. 19 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Leo Besaw, 22 Aster Lane, Williston VT 05495, (802)343-8045 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Fee simple 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #)_ Leo Besaw. 22 Aster Lane. Williston VT 05495. (802)343-8045 5a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS n/a 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive, South Burlington VT 05403 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0570-00358 & 1490-00055 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) +/- 8.274 SF Retail at 358 Dorset Street: +/- 5.503 SF billiards club at 55 San Remo Drive b) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 9) LOT COVERAGES FOR EACH LOT LOT #1 (Street Address): 358 Dorset Street a) Building: Existing 41.3 % Proposed 35.5 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 86.1 % Proposed 87.2 % c) Front yard along each street Existing 100 % Proposed 100 (applies only to commercial property) LOT #2 (Street Address): 55 San Remo Drive d) Building: Existing 25.1 % Proposed 26.0 % e) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 87.6 % Proposed 78.2 % 0 Front yard along each street Existing 100 % Proposed 100 (applies only to commercial property) 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) Existing easements "A", "B", "D" & "E" and a proposed "Shared Access Easement" (as shown on Barnard & Gervais, LLC BLA Plat dated 07/28/2017 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Sewer and water supply flows net decrease from 1,035 gpd to 1,030 gpd. Flows to be reallocated as follows: 358 Dorset St. - from 285 gpd to 720 gpd.; 55 San Remo Dr. - from 750 gpd to 310 gpd. 13) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the Land Development Regulations. Three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. Applicant fees must be included. Mt 2 Minor Lot Line Adjustment Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowled GNA URE OF APPLICANT GN :RE OF PROPERTY OWNER #1 --W/ 4k, t�� SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER #2 Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: v / I have reviewed is application and find it to be: Comp: The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Minor Lot Line Adjustment Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 BARNARD & GERVAIS, LLC Land Surveyors, Licensed Designers, Environmental Consultants www.barnardandgervais.com August 7, 2017 Mr. Raymond Belair Dept. of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Subject: Besaw LLC, 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, VT — Boundary Line Adjustment and Dissolving of a Boundary Line. Dear Mr. Belair: I am writing on behalf of Besaw, LLC requesting administrative approval of a Minor Lot Line Adjustment for the properties at 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo drive, both of which are under the common ownership of Besaw, LLC (principals Leo & Annette Besaw). Based on a review of a Gregory F. Dubois, L.S. survey plat dated September 2004 and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records in Map Slide #451, the property consists of three (3) separate parcels that were created in 2004 and thus pre- date January 1, 2007. The properties are served by the City of South Burlington municipal water and sewer systems. Besaw, LLC is proposing to eliminate one of the parcels (Lot 3) by dissolving a boundary line and adjusting the boundary line between the two commercial parcels (Lots 1 & 2). As a result of this boundary line adjustment and dissolving of a boundary line, Lot 1 will be 0.53+/- acres in size and will contain the existing commercial building located at 358 Dorset Street. Lot 2 will be 0.49+/- acres in size and will contain the existing commercial building located at 55 San Remo Drive. The adjusted boundary line between Lots 1 & 2 will be beneficial to the owners for administration and maintenance of the shared access parking between the two buildings. The dissolved boundary line between Lots 2 & 3 will be beneficial to the owners and the City of South Burlington by eliminating the non -conforming Lot 3 and merging it with Lot 2. Leo & Annette Besaw look forward to your administrative approval of the proposed Minor Lot Line Adjustment. In the meantime, should you have any questions or comments relative to the information presented above, please call me at (802) 482-2597. Sincerely, Scott Baker Project Manager/Draftsman c: Besaw, LLC Hinesburg: 10523 VT Route 116, P.O. Box 133, Hinesburg, VT 05461; Phone (802) 482-2597 Enosburg Falls: 167 Main Street Suite 10, P.O. Box 820, Enosburg Falls, VT 05450; Phone (802) 933-5168 I BARNARD & GERVAIS, LLC Land Surveyors, Licensed Designers, Environmental Consultants www.barnardandgervais.com Description Lot-1 358 Dorset Lot-2 55 San Remo Adjustment Lot-3 Notes (No Address) Lot Size - Existing (SF) 20,029 21,965 2,450 Calculated from B&G 2017 survey Lot Size - Proposed (SF) 23,281 21,163 0 Calculated from B&G 2017 survey Building Coverage (SF) 8,274 5,503 0 Calculated from B&G 2017 survey Building Coverage - Existing (%) 41.3% 25.1% 0.0% Building Area/ Existing Lot Size Building Coverage - Proposed (%) 35.5% 26.0% N/A Building Area/ Proposed Lot Size Overall Coverage - Existing (SF) 17,237 19,234 381 Calculated from B&G 2017 survey Overall Coverage - Proposed (SF) 20,297 16,555 N/A Calculated from B&G 2017 survey Overall Coverage - Existing (%) 86.1% 87.6% 15.6% Existing Overall Coverage/ Existing Lot Size Overall Coverage - Proposed (%) 87.2% 78.2% N/A Proposed Overall Coverage/ Proposed Lot Size Hinesburg: 10523 VT Route 116, P.O. Box 133, Hinesburg, VT 05461; Phone (802) 482-2597 Enosburg Falls: 167 Main Street Suite 10, P.O. Box 820, Enosburg Falls, VT 05450; Phone (802) 933-5168 j"RBF W/ CAF L.S. #595 FLUSH I N7'55'30"N 23.29' CHAMPLAIN OIL J"RBF W/ CAP COMPANY, INC. L.S /595 FLUSH N/F VOL216, PGA NT3521"W 14 00' N82-25'33"E PROPOSED SHARED - ACCESS EASEMENT o- 358 DORSET STREET BESAW, LLC LOT 1 0.53 ACRES 8,274SF BUILDING ' 2 STORY BUILDING 11 _ �Li ;GNC_Rf TE PAl] y?j9 N82'25'33"E - t I 3.41 'I iN! L STOCKADE AJI:hll �ii FENCE II 1 55 SANREMO DRIVE +ARK7NG '' BESAW, LLC BE N/F y VOL.984, PG. 16 LOT 2 oa+t 0.49 ACRES FI 5,534SF BUILDING a�f "QNC !YN, L i( WAY V; I,AV _ D I 1 l I I i PAVt:-D i v '07'27"E PARKING I v. 1 r?� 1 Yx � 1 A,. 2.4NA ✓ I. I I I l 1 R-22967.32' L-101.70' 1 r /ice ---- _ DB=N7'48'53"W — - - --- ,Ili I - S82'25315 PK NAIL - ll l�I 3.35 FOUND WITH SLIGHT LEAN - IN EASTERLY - DIRECTION PAVED I PARKING -------""'W 152.92' tANIJSCAPTC 582'2533" AREA - ' n PAVED PARKING I y .... �ttt F ROPOSLO 1 A I ME NT TABIt, 1 STORY BUILDING DORSET STREETI INUEAMW E t7�I (ANCE REAL ESTATE I N82'2b 90 f 23 41' HOLDINGS, LLC '- _-- _ - ---- 2 N82 75 31 'E ! 27.08" N/F 3 5T2804'L /2,41' VOL.848, PG.138 l4 S8J'O>44 W.... �F 94• L S8`L'Oy'44"W LEGEND — PROJECT BOUNDARY LINES SURVEY REFERENCES --- — PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINES I. "SURVEY OF LAND OWNED BY PATRICK MALONE /358 DORSET STREET SOUTH -------- ------------ BOUNDARY LINES TO BE DISSOLVED BURUNGTON, VERMONT" DATED SEPT. 2004 BY VT AND SOFF ------- ABUTTING BOUNDARY LINES RECORDEDFAT THEI CITY SOUTHLIN, BURLINGTON MAP RECORDS IN MAP SLIDE 451 --- SIDELINE OF EXISTING EASEMENT 2. "PLAT SHOWING SURVEY OF PROPERTY OF - - SIDELINE OF PROPOSED EASEMENT RANDALL MUNSON d/b/o SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY COMPANY" DATED NOV. 1999 BY OPE4 REBAR FOUND VAUGHN C. BUTTON, L.S AND RECORDED AT THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON MAP RBS n REBAR SET RECORDS IN MAP SLIDE 396. �\ CALCULATED CORNER 3. "DESIGN MATTERS PARKING" SITE PLAN NOW OR FORMERLY DATED C . 2004 AND REVISED FEB. 2005 N/F PREPARED BY DeWOLFE ENGINEERING -- r . ---- ---- STOCKADE FENCE ASSOCIATES, u u r. - CHAIN LINK FENCE 4. "PLAT OF SURVEY. LOCATION: SAN REMO DRIVE, CHTTTENDEN COUNTY, SOUTH PARKING STRIPE BURLINGTON. VERMONT. RECORD OWNER: THERESA L. PIZZAGALLL CONVEYED TO: — FM FM — FORCE MAIN SEWER SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY CORP." BY PAUL MARCOTTE. L.S. AND DATED SEPT. 25, 1973. — W W — WATER SERVICE LINE .. .. SEWER MAIN 30 2 .5 1� i�. GRAPHIC SCALE 1 INCH = 30 FEET EASEMENTS, OTHER EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND UNWRITTEN RIGHTS MAY EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PARCEL NOT SHOWN HEREON. THE EXISTING EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN REFERENCE TO A TITLE REPORT ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL PREPARED BY JOSEPH D. FALLON ATTORNEY AT LAW IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE TO BESAW, LLC. EASEMENT "A" - 7'K39' SIDEWALK EASEMENT BENEFITING THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON RECORDED IN VOL.710, PG.726-727. EASEMENT "B" - 35'X170' ACCESS EASEMENT BENEFITING THE PARCEL TO THE SOUTH NOW OR FORMERLY SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY COMPANY RECORDED IN VOL.623, PG.225 EASEMENT "D" - 13'X18' UTILITY EASEMENT BENEFITING GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER COMPANY, NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE, AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY AND ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION RECORDED IN VOL.304, PC.469-472. EASEMENT "E" - 13'X6' UTILITY EASEMENT BENEFITING GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION, NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY AND ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION RECORDED IN VOL. 304, PG.473-476. EASEMENT "F" - NOT PLOTA13LE EASEMENT BENEFITING GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER. EASEMENT "G" - 10' WIDE EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE BENEFITING VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. RECORDED IN VOL.277, PG.100. Z N a f ' "SITES u e LOCUS PLAN NOT TO SCALE SURVEY NOTES: 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON WERE GENERATED FROM SURVEY GRADE GPS READINGS COLLECTED WITH A TOPCON HYPER SR CPS RECEIVER ON RANDOM CONTROL POINTS AND ADJUSTED TO VT GRID NAD83(2011) USING REAL TIME KINEMATICS WITH CORRECTIONS FROM VTCORS STATION ID VTUV. 2. NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO LOCATE OR IDENTIFY ANY EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 3, A CLOSED TRAVERSE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED IN JULY. 2017 USING A LEICA TS15 TOTAL STATION. THE RESULTING ERROR MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED ERROR FOR URBAN SURVEY AS ESTABLISHED BY THE VERMONT BOARD OF 'LAND SURVEYORS. 4. ALL EVIDENCE OF MONUMENTATION FOUND ON THE SURVEYED PREMISES ARE SHOWN HEREON. MOtVUMENTATION FOUND IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN GOOD AND STABLE CONDITION U LESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL IRON PIPE DIMENSIONS PERTAIN TO INSIDE DIAMETER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. THE RIGHT OF WAY SIDELINES FOR DORSET STREET & SAN REMO DRIVE ARE SHOWN WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO SURVEY REFERENCES 1 & 4 OF THIS PLAT. THE DORSET STREET RIGHT OF WAY HAS A VARYING WIDTH. SAN REMO DRIVE HAS A 50' RIGHT OF WAY AND THE SIDELINE WAS ESTABLISHED BASED ON SAID SURVEYS AND MONUMENTATION RECOVERED. 6. ALL AREA CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE EDGE OF THE RIGHTS OF WAY OF SAID ROAD AND NOT THE CENTERLINE THEREOF. 7. ALL REBARS SET ARE 5/8" WITH A CAP STAMPED M.GERVAIS VTLS 735 AND ALL MONUMENTATION FOUND IS AS NOTED. REBARS TO BE SET IN PAVEMENT AND/OR CONCRETE WILL NOT HAVE CAPS. 8. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO THIS PLAN SHALL INVALIDATE ANY AND ALL CERTIFICATIONS MADE BY BARNARD & GERVAIS, LLC, AND FURTHER ANY PARTIES INVOLVED IN SAID ALTERATIONS AND/OR MODIFICATIONS SHALL. BE HELD LIABLE AND MAY BE PROSECUTED IN A COURT OF LAW. 9. BARNARD AND GERVAIS, LLC. MAKES NO WARRANTIES THAT ALL ENCUMBRANCES THAT. EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PARCEL ARE SO HEREON. ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES THAT MAY EXIST INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO. WETLANDS, WELL AND SEPTIC ISOLATION ZONES, HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES AND/OR BROWNFIELDS WITH ASSOCIATED ISOLATION ZONES. 10. NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO LOCATE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND ANY LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE DEEMED APPROXIMATE. 11. SOME TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES ON THIS PLAT WERE PLACED WITH AID OF SURVEY DATA PROVIDED TO RBBAARNN,rARRDE & GERVAIS, F FLLLCgBBYgDDeRWOORLFF ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, THESE FE/�LLICEIVED' FOR FRECORDRjNI% CITY QF SOUTH BURLINGTON FOR ACCURACY. THIS --- __- DAY OF — -------- -, 2017 I SLIDE#'--- i AT ------- O'CLOCK _------- MINUTES ____M 'I AND RECORDED IN SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT ATTEST--------------------------- _ TOWN CLERK OWNER BESAW, LLC 22 ASTER LANE WILLISTON, VT 05495 VOL.984 PG.19 I CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS 41, y`E' PLAN IS BASED ON INFORMATION ABSTRACTED FROM MICHAEL PERTINENT DEEDS AND/OR OTHER OFFICIAL RECORDS AND CONFORMS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA & 1403. - �ii GERVAIS DATEj? THIS .1i � DAY OF a--d . 2017. n No. 735 / L.S. 735 BARNARD & ana aurvepny GERVAIS, LLC Water 8 Wastewater Environmental Consuttln of Mr, 69M P.o 6,,,aro yr Pom. raa PROJECT IN F.I,A9,19 F�M, V<U5�5:i rc3 -) 9N262 TWpla+'IlOYI9?1-}Iu. iexpl�"w,n l9mI b2359] U DATE: LANDS OF 7.26-17 scALE BESAW, LLC I- NY SURVEY'. RG DRAWN: 358 DORSET STREET & 55 SAN REMO DRIVE RG BOUNDARY LINE CHECKED' MG ADJUSTMENT PLAT DRAWING pL-1 THESE PIANSWiTII IATEST EFVISKINS SHOiii 10141111 IIS"I OR THE PURPOSE SHO M 6E LOW SKFTCWCONCEPT [_ ] PRELIMINARY 0 FINAL LOCAL REVIEW SfIFEE i OF July 24, 2014 Re: #SP-14-20 & #DR-14-04 — 358 Dorset Street & San Remo Drive Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc rely, ay and J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 1671 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: June 27,2014 SP_14_20_and_DR_14_04_358DorsetSt_BesawLLC Plans received: May 15, 2014 BESAW, LLC SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-14-20 & DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION #DR-14-04 Agenda #6 Meeting date: July 1, 2014 Applicant/Owner Besaw, LLC 22 Aster Lane Williston, VT Contact Person Property Information Annette Besaw Tax Parcel 22 Aster Lane Volume 984, pages 19-22 Williston, VT CD2 and Design Review Districts 1.02 Acres PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site plan application #SP-14-20 & design review application #DR-14-04 of Besaw, LLC to amend a previously approved plan for an 8,000 sq. ft. retail building and a 5,200 sq. ft. building used for indoor recreation use. The amendment consists of: 1) after -the -fact approval to relocate a dumpster enclosure, and 2) altering the southerly fagade of 358 Dorset Street, 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive. COMMENTS Administrative Officer Ray Belair and Planner Temporary Assignment Lee Krohn, AICP, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on May 15, 2014 and offer the following comments. There is one (1) change proposed to the site plan: Relocated dumpster enclosure (after -the -fact): this appears to simply be a reapplication of #SP- 12-43 which was already approved back in 2012, with a new dumpster enclosure at the rear of the parking lot in between the buildings, and screened with a stockade fence reused from its former location. As noted, the DRB had already approved this back in 2012, based on site plan C1.02, entitled Design Matters Parking, prepared by DeWolfe Engineering Associates, dated December 9, 2010. The design review change is: Proposed anew here is a design amendment, to cover up/wrap existing concrete and steel support pillars in front of the building with square and rectangular "azek on stucco" materials. Based on the drawings submitted, staff believes this a real improvement over the existing'sonotube wrap' bare concrete and steel 1-beams; certainly better befitting a visible building on a busy public street housing a design studio. The application includes photos of the existing building, and several renderings of the proposed improvements. Staff feels the addition is in full compliance with the design standards of Article 11. RECOMMENDATION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD 14 18 and DR 14 05 135Hinesburand BlackbayVentures prelim If all issues are addressed and there is no additional information needed to make a decision, the Board should close the hearing. Respectfully submitted, 7��,Q Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer Copy to: Paul O'Leary � » � �� ` ..�\� � yy� \.d2 � « ~� � � � � � � � � � � � \» .� \\� � �� �� . � \ � . \/ �� � � \� < \ ./ . . � ..� . . .. ` f .� ƒ� 802 865 2581 9 358 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT 05403 • designmattersvt.com I -01KERiff I MEIN 00; a CA-) LAf CA a-c,/k 1 SS�-t' c o -T k;z c Le ekA CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifythatowthis � day of , 20)9, a copy of the foregoing public notice for &' a of a ic� # --1 Y - [application number was [tYP PP ] S� � [ PP ], sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) Dated al(�C %� [town/city], Vermont, this ) 9 day of� l �..� 120 V Printed Name: Ahnd%�31 'e'5G' Phone number and email: Signature: Date: Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 South Burlington Realty 85 Shunpike Rd. Williston, VT 05495 Champlain Oil Corp. 45 San Remo Drive. So. Burlington, VT 05403 Vermont Business Magazine 365 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT 05403 Green Mountain Suites 401 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT 05403 Spotlight on Dance 50 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Associates in Orthopedic Surgery 6 San Remo Dr. So. Burlington, VT 05403 Bouchard & Sons Garage 16 San Remo Dr. So. Burlington, VT 5403 Vermont Center of Integrative Therapy 75 San Remo Dr. So. Burlington, VT 05403 AM4 job Permit Number DR- N - (ollice use only) APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW (NON -SIGN) All information requested on this application must be completed in fiill. failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. for amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNM(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone =�sQa.-32 - a0a3 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) �cq, p �, c d 4 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailin 7 address, phone and fax #)_ Akin)M4Q-++P_ CkP.0 nMAI I-).,) P,- . _J__ I - 1 e 3a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS Ann rtte8 OCS6 Y) YYImiiYSy-t - COm 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 35 ( DDYSCIi St. S0• 3U Y 1 I h q�hi 5) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General prgject description (explain what you want approval for): i 9) PLANS AND FEE �� � � �i � ) � ) 3 i � ��� CC' � � G «� d Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11 " x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) 575 Dorset Street South Burlington; VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com copy of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V. S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. cc'^� ��- -R)-Q SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: LIZ rZY I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: 2-Complete ❑ Incomplete The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Design Review Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 south ur n PLANNING & ZONING Pcrmit Number SP- /� - (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑ Administrative Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be.completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Besaw, LLC 22 Aster Lane, Williston, VT 05495 Ph: 343-8045 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): Vol. 984, pages 19-22 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Same as Owner 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff Include name, address, phone & fax #): Paul O'Leary, O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates 1 Corporate Drive, Suite 1, Essex Jet., VT 05452 Ph: 878-9990, Fax: 878-9989 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS: poleary@olearyburke.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 4358 Dorset Street and #55 San Remo Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0570-00358 & 01490-00055 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com P 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain 1wh�at you want approval for): b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 8,000 sf Retail building and 5,200 sf indoor recreation building c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): to remain, 2,600 sf of San Remo Drive building t �0 d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): No change to building sizes of 8,000 sf and 5,200 sf. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): No changes. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A. g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): No changes. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Marcel Size: 44,564 sf I a. Building: Existing 29.6 % 13,200 sq. ft. Proposted 29.6 % / 13,200 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 82.7 % / 36,854 sq. ft. Proposed 82.7 % / 36,854 sq. fl. c. Front yard (along each street) 1 Existing 37.1 % / 65.8% 928 sf & 536 sf Proposed 37.1 % / 65.8% 928 sf & 536 sf d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) N/A* * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermongt Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire IL PEAK HOURS OF OPERA 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATI 1.3. ESTIMATED PROJECT ): $ N/A $ N/A list with cost): $ None (In and out): No changes. : 8:00 pm Monday - Friday ON DATE: Following Approval 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy ofth- site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submiung the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. WN inn"'11,1 hAA' 11nA) .n Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 M NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: \ /q lY REVIEW AUTHORITY: O Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: U Complete ❑ Incompl to T— — A �(�-4--//s d 'nistrative fficer bate Cs3 cw The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 June 12, 2013 Leo O. Besaw Besaw, LLC 358 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Expiration of #SP-12-43, 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Besaw: Please be advised that site plan approval #SP-12-43 issued to you to convert indoor recreation use to medical office use and site modifications at 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive on 10/22/12 has expired. This approval expired due to noncompliance with condition #4 of said decision which required that a zoning permit be issued for this work within six (6) months of the date of the decision. Therefore, you must resubmit a site plan review application for this project as soon as possible. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sin aymond*Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Agenda #3 TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM; Dan Albrecht, Contractor, Chittenden County RPC Raymond I Belair, Administrative Officer MEETING DATE; October 2, 2012 CC: Besaw, LLC, Applicant RE; #SP-12-43 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive Site Plan Application #SP-12-43 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive Site plan application #SP-12-43 of Besaw, LLC to amend a previously approved plan for an 8,000 sq. ft. retail building and a 5,200 sq. ft. building used for indoor recreation use. The 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com amendment consists of converting 2,600 sq. ft. of indoor recreation use to medical office use, 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive. Administrative Officer Ray Belair and Dan Albrecht, Chittenden County RPC Contractor, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on August 31 2012 and have the following comments. The project consists of converting 2,600 sq. ft. of indoor recreation use to medical office use, 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements Central District 2 Zoning District Required Proposed Max. Floor Area Ratio 50% 29.62 % Max. Building Coverage 40% 29.6 % �l Max. Overall Coverage 90% 82.7 % Min. Side Setback 5 ft. > 5 ft. � Zoning compliance Pursuant to Sections 14.06 and 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations, the following review standards shall apply to site plan applications: (a) The relationship of the proposed development to goals and objectives set forth in the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. This criterion will continue to be met. Medical offices are a permitted use in the zoning district (b) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas This criterion will continue to be met Subsection 13.01(E). Shared Parking on a Single Lot, (1) As a matter of public policy, the City of South Burlington finds that the coordination of off-street parking between adjoining non-residential sites is desirable (1) to allow for traffic circulation between sites rather than having all traffic entering and exiting the existing road system to proceed from site to site, (2) to allow for improved pedestrian circulation, and (3) to reduce the overall amount of paved surface on a site. This coordination can take various forms, from a simple paved connection to a more elaborate plan to provide both a connection and shared parking page 2 of 6 arrangements. Such connection and shared parking are not to be considered a parking waiver, but an agreement between the landowners and the City of South Burlington to effect an overaf/ circulation and parking plan. (2) Where the Development Review Board determines that a proposed development consisting of two (2) or more uses will generate different hourly, daily and/or seasonal parking demands due to the varied hours of operation of each use and different peaking characteristics, the Development Review Board may approve a site plan or PUD utilizing shared parking on the site that is the subject of the application, or on another site (see Shared Parking, Section 13.01(E) above). The Development Review Board may, at its discretion, allow for a reduced number of shared parking spaces to be provided, on or off site, provided that. (a) The applicant shall provide the Development Review Board with a site plan and a complete and accurate description of the proposed uses and floor areas devoted to such uses Aff uses participating in the shared parking plan must be located within a convenient walking distance to the shared parking facility, which generally shaft be defined as one -quarter (114) mile. (b) A shared parking analysis shaft be presented calculating the parking demand for each individual use by time period and, where applicable, by season, in the form of a matrix. The various time periods shaft depend on the uses being analyzed. These periods typically include a weekday morning, weekday lunch time, weekday afternoon, weekday evening, Saturday midday and Saturday evening. If the uses experience significant seasonal variations the analysis should be done for the peak season and possibly for different seasons (summer, winter, special events, etc.) For each use, the matrix should indicate the individual peak demand corresponding to the parking requirement as indicated in Tables 13-1 through 13-6, then the expected demand for each time period being analyzed in terms of a percentage of the peak demand and the number of parking spaces required for that use at that particular time period. For instance, if there is a 50,000 SF office component in a mixed -use project, the peak demand for that component is 175 spaces (3.5 times 50), and during the weekday am period that component will have a presence of 100%, i.e. 175spaces, during lunch time the presence would be 90%, i.e. 158 spaces, during the weekday afternoon the presence would be 9701b, i.e. 170 spaces, and during the evening hours the presence would be 20016, i.e. 35 spaces The same analysis needs to be done for the other uses that are part of the sharing arrangement. To calculate the total number of spaces required with the sharing arrangement the numbers of spaces required for each use need to be added for each time period, and the largest number determines the requirement. This analysis should be undertaken by a professional planner or engineer, and can be based on the "Shared Parking"publication by the Urban Land Institute or on "Shared page 3 of 6 Parking Planning Guidelines-, an informational report by the Institute of Transportation Engineers In some cases the applicant may have to undertake specific surveys of individual uses to determine the percentage present at various time periods If the parking demand of a new use is to be shared with an existing use the applicant should undertake an occupancy survey of the existing parking facility. (c) The parking spaces that are part of shared parking plan cannot be reserved for individual users or destinations, unless those reserved spaces are excluded from the calculation. (d) The Development Review Board may order the property owner to construct the future parking spaces if, at the Administrative Officer's recommendation, the DRB determines a need for additional spaces to be constructed. For example, a change in the use(s) or the ownership of the parcel may be enough to require the installation of the parking spaces In the event that the owner fails to install the additional parking spaces within one hundred twenty (120) days of being so ordered the City Attorney shall take appropriate action in a court of competent jurisdiction to restrain the use of said premises When this subsection is utilized, the site plan shall contain a statement, signed by the applicant in such a form as shall be approved by the City Attorney, consenting to the provisions contained herein. In addition, the property owner shall be required to submit a covenant, for filing in the City Clerk's office, in such a form as shall be approved by the City Attorney, indicating consent to the provisions of this subsection. (e) The approval of such shared parking shall be automatically terminated upon the termination of the operation of any of the involved uses The property currently has 48 parking spaces on site to serve both buildings. The applicant has submitted a spreadsheet prepared by O'Leary - Burke Civil Associates from the Urban Land Institute data for shared parking. Their calculations determine that peak activity for the three (3) uses on the property will occur at different times with the peak demand for 55 parking spaces occurring during the 8 p.m. hour in July. The applicant is requesting a 12.7 percent off-street parking waiver ( 7 spaces) as permitted under Section 13.01 N. (2) of the LDRs which states that "(w)here the Development Review Board determines that a proposed land use or structure is adequately served by existing or proposed parking facilities, the Development Review Board may waive the off-street parking space requirements stipulated in Tables 13-1 through 13-6, by no more than twenty-five percent (25%). " Staff has reviewed the site plan and feels that the proposed waiver of 7 parking spaces will not have a material affect on the availability of parking for the three uses. The property is located in a central mixed use area within the City, is adjacent to a network of sidewalks, page 4 of 6 recreation paths, and is has regular transit service. 1. The Board should discuss the applicant's analysis and request showing a base requirement of 55 spaces for the three (3) uses on the property using a shared parking analysis. 2. The Board should discuss the requested waiver of parking spaces, for a total of a 48 spaces, a 12.79,16 waiver of the base requirement of 55 spaces. Section 13.01 of the Land Development Regulations requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities be provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bike rack is shown on the plans adjacent to the proposed medical office. Although not required, staff feels that installation of bike rack to serve the Dorset Street building should be considered. .3. The Board should discuss installation of a second bike rack to serve the Dorset Street building. (c) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings No changes are proposed to the general layout of the parking lot. (d) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings No exterior changes are proposed to the buildings. This criterion will continue to be met. (e) Newly installed utility service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. No changes are proposed. This criterion will continue to be met. (f) The combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens, and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings or different architectural styles shall be encouraged. No changes are proposed. This criterion will continue to be met. (g) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. No changes are proposed. This criterion will continue to be met. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the followingLSp cific standards set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. page 5 of 6 Staff feels that the reservation of land is not necessary. The property is connected to the south and has access to Dorset Street and San Remo Drive. This criterion will continue to be met. (b) Electric, to%phone, and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground, Any utility installations remaining above ground shaft be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. No new utility services are proposed. This criterion will continue to be met. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure, and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). Two, screened dumpsters are shown on the plans. This criterion will be met. (d) Landscaping and screening requirements See comment under "OTHER" below. OTHER STANDARDS: Section 13,06((B) Snow Storage, Pursuant to Section 13.06(B), snow storage areas must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans depict adequate snow storage areas. Section 13.07(A) Lighting. Pursuant to Section 13.07(A), all exterior lighting shall be shielded and downcasting to prevent light from spilling onto adjacent properties and rights -of - way. No changes to lighting are proposed. This criterion will be met. OTHER Staff notes the plan submitted is several years old and does not reflect current site conditions. 4. The applicant should provide an updated set of plans that reflect current site conditions. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the 'Comments Section" of this document before closing the hearing.. page 6 of 6 r Ar bill a south urlin to PLANNING & ZONING October 22, 2012 Re: #SP-12-43 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months_ If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc ely, aymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 4665 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINOTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this day of , 209, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Site Plana application #SP-12 4t b U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the �1? Y � � P r owners of all properties adjoining the su ' ct property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: Neil & Barbara Shepard 359 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 McQuiston Boutin Holdings, LLC 365 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Champlain Oil P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, Dorset Street Real Estate 85 Shunpike Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Pizzagali 193 Tilley Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Realty Company 50 San Remo Drive VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dated at Essex, Vermont, this day of , 20 Printed Name: Paul O'Leary, Jr., P.E.; Phone number and email: hon 80 - email: poleary@olearyburke.com Signature: Date: ---- -- — Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Cenifirate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 ft WMA, 'dir sout4urlington PLANNING i ZONING Permit Number SP-9' -V);? (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑ Administrative evelopment Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Besaw, LLC 22 Aster Lane, Williston, VT 05495 Ph: 343-8045 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page ft Vol. 984, pages 19-22 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Same as Owner 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Paul O'Leary, O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates 1 Corporate Drive, Suite 1, Essex Jet., VT 05452 Ph: 878-9990, Fax: 878-9989 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS: poleary@olearyburke.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: #358 Dorset Street and #55 San Remo Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0570-00358 & 01490-00055 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Change in use, add Medical Office to existing building. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 8,000 sf Retail building and 5,200 sf indoor recreation building c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Retail and indoor recreation uses to remain, 2,600 sf of San Remo Drive building to change from indoor recreation to Medical Office. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): No change to building sizes of 8,000 sf and 5,200 sf. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): No changes. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A. g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): No changes. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 44,564 sf a. Building: Existing 29.6 % 13,200 sq. ft. Proposed 29.6 % / 13,200 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 82.7 % / 36,854 sq. ft. Proposed 82.7 % / 36,854 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 37.1 % / 65.8% 928 sf & 536 sf Proposed 37.1 % / 65.8% 928 sf & 536 sf d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) N/A* * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ N/A b. Landscaping: $ N/A c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): $ None 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): No changes. 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 pm 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Friday 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Following Approval 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Q=tn . a SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERT WNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this fine DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Ja Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ ncomplete inistrative Officer The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE (#358 DORSET STREET (3) h RHODODENDRON 'PJA FIW (1) 7G ARBORVITAE 'SU KIST COLD' (3) 2G HYDRANGEA 'BOMBSHELL! (3) 6G RHODODENDRON 'PM WW: (3) 39 SPIREA 'MAGIC CARPEY (1) B + B DAPHNE TM1OL MAOR' REMOVE & EXISTING PLAN DOWNCAST UGHTS TYPCAL OF (4) W 1.5 Ld F- y Q A: OV1517- R EM732' L - BOL70' N/F MUNSON DBA SOUTH OURLIAICIOH REALTY CO. OWNER & APPLICANT: ANNETTE BESAW (BESAW, LLC) DESIGN MATTERS 358 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 LOT AREA = 44,564 SF = 1.02 ACRES EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 13,200 SF = 29.6% COVERAGE FRONT YARD = 2500 SF DORSET STREET - 928 SF IMPERVIOUS = 37.1% FRONT YARD 875 SAN REMO DRIVE - 536 SF IMPERVIOUS = 65.8 % ZONING DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT 2 OVERLAY DESIGN DISTRICT 2 EXISTING GREEN AREA = 7,710 SF = 17.3% EXISTING PAVED AREA = 19,602 SF = 44.0% 48 TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROPOSED NEW DUMPSTER SITE 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK WTH FORENTROtEN PRIVACY MIS PROJECT SI TE w� (RELOCATE/REMOVE) LLGEN D' DUYPSIFR' CRUSHED STONE PAD, AND STOCKADE PENCE APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE o a o / a � IYan" VIM [orc. CuM m Y L a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TO BE APPROVED BY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DESIGN RENEW COMMITTEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX D OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. NEW 3' LocusT REMOVE PINE -a--o---o— o CHAIML04K FENCE — - APPROX. CENTERLINE IMMJ�J TREE LINE --/02---- EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR S SEWER LINE D DRAINAGE LINE 0 IRON ROD FOUND - BENT FUTURE SIDEWALK A NAIL FOUND BY CITY -� COMBINATION POLE DOWNC0 LIGHT LIGHTS ► GROUND LIGHTS TYPICAL OF (4) BIKE RACK (s)SEWER MANHOLE RELOCATE (2) PJM ❑ CATCH BASIN 7ODODENDRON ®B' MAPLE DECIDUOUS TREE r—(7) BOXWOOD OWNER SHALL REPLACE BIRCH 1 4"-^,=API - SCHEDI0 WITH 3'-3.5' CHANTICLEER (#55 SAN REMO DRIVE) CALLERY PEAR, PYRUS CALLERYANA D - 'KELSEYS COMPACT' DOGWOOD (11) 'CHANTICLEER' AFTER CONSTRUCTION H - HOLLY "BLAZE PRINCESS' (2) OF NEW MUNICIPAL SIDEWALK BY OTHERS. BLUE PRINCE' (1) K 'KNOCKOUT ROSE' (13) P - POTENT)LLA 'GOIDFINGER' (7) PG - PEE -GEE DWARF HYDRANGEA (1) R - RHODO. 'PJA ELITE' (9) W - WEIGELA -WINE k ROSES' (5) SURVEYOR'S NOTES- 8 - BOXWOOD 'SASKATOON' (7) 3G 1. THIS IS NOT A PROPERTY SURVEY. APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON A DISTURBED (BENT) IRON ROD FOUND ALONG SAN REMO ROAD. NAILS WERE FOUND ALONG DORSET STREET BUT DID NOT MATCH THE DEEDED FRONTAGE OF 125 FEET. 2. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT DETERMINED. INVERTS [IF DRAINAGE LINES WITHIN THE CATCH BASINS TO BE CHECKED AT A LATER DATE. THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SEWER, WATER, DRAINAGE, GAS AND OTHER UTILITY LINES TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK. 3. THE UTILITY BOXES IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING ALONG DORSET STREET ARE SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT TO GREEN MOUNTAIN POVER AND NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH. THIS EASEMENT IS 18' WIDE (EAST -WEST) AND 13' WIDE (NORTH -SOUTH). OTHER EASEMENTS ON THIS PROPERTY MAY EXIST BUT DEED AND PLAN RESEARCH ON THIS PROPERTY AND ABUTTORS WAS NOT DUNE, 4. THE VERTICAL DATUM WAS ASSUMED AS 100.00' (BUILDING FLOOR) RECEI V Er MAY 15 2014 City of So. Burlingtor GRAPHIC SCMX ( OI FEY) 11—b - 20 1L O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC I CIVIL ENGINEERING I REGULATORY AND PERMIT PREPARATION I LAND SURVEYING I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I LAND USE PLANNING August 31, 2012 Mr. Ray Belair Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Matters (Besaw LLC) #358 Dorset Street & #55 San Remo Drive Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of Leo and Annette Besaw to amend the Site Plan for their property that fronts on both Dorset Street and San Remo Drive. There are two existing buildings located on the property. The 8,000 sf building that fronts on Dorset Street currently contains retail uses. The 5,200 sf building that fronts on San Remo Drive currently contains a billiard club (recreational use). The owners are proposing to add a medical use to half of the the building that fronts on San Remo Drive. The billiard club will remain in the other half. The property currently has 48 parking spaces on the site. Per the South Burlington Land Development Code, Article 13 E. (2) 'Shared Parking on a Single Lot' allows for the approval of a Site Plan with shared parking if the Design Review Board determines that two (2) or more uses will generate different hourly parking demands. Attached is a spread sheet prepared from the Urban Land Institute data for shared parking. The calculations determine that peak activity for the three (3) uses on the property will occur at different times with the peak demand for 55 parking spaces occurring during the 8:00 pm hour in July. Article 13 N. (2) of the Code 'Waivers' allows for a waiver of up to 25% of the required parking requirements if the Design Review Board determines that the property is adequately served by the parking facilities. With 48 parking spaces available on the property a waiver of 7 parking spaces (12.7%) is being requested. 1 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE #1 ESSEX JUNCTION VERMONT 05452 TEL 802 878 9990 1 FAX 802 878 9989 1 obca@olearyburke.com C ................................. .................... ................................. ....I ............... ................................. .................... ................................. .................... ................................. .................... :U.se of Bldg Floor Area ....................... ....................... ....................... ....................... ....................... BIi9g Floor Area ssf .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... Peak .; .Parking; Spaces Re uired Residential (Apts.) 0 0 Retail 8,000 32 Drive -In Bank 0 0 Indoor Recreation 2,600 33 General Office 0 0 Medical Office 2,600 13 Restaurant 0 0 Total 78 Design Matters 358 Dorset Street Required spaces based on 4 spaces per 1000 sf Required spaces based on .33 spaces per occupant Required spaces based on 5 spaces per 1000 sf Required spaces based on City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations Monthly Adjustment, July Business Hours Spaces Required (Apts.) Adjusted Spaces Required (Apts.) Spaces Required (Retail) Adjusted Spaces Required Retail Spaces Required Indoor Recreation) Adjusted Spaces Required (Indoor Recreation) Spaces Required (Office) Adjusted Spaces Required (Office)_(Restaurant) Spaces Required Adjusted spaces Required (Restaurant) Total Adjusted Spaces Required 6:00 a.m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 a.m. 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 3 0 0 5 8:00 a.m. 0 0 6 5 0 0 8 8 0 0 13 9:00 a.m. 0 0 13 10 0 0 12 12 0 0 22 10:00 a.m. 0 0 22 17 0 0 13 13 0 0 30 11:00 a.m. 0 0 28 21 0 0 13 13 0 0 34 12:00 noon 0 0 31 23 3 3 12 12 0 0 38 1:00 P.M. 0 0 32 24 7 7 12 12 0 0 43 2:00 p.m. 0 0 31 23 10 10 13 13 0 0 46 3.00 p.m. 0 0 30 23 10 10 12 12 0 0 45 4:00 p.m. 0 0 28 21 10 10 10 10 0 0 41 5:00 P.M. 0 0 25 19 10 10 6 6 0 0 35 6:00 p.m. 0 0 26 20 26 26 3 3 0 0 49 7:00 p.m. 0 0 28 21 30 30 1 1 0 0 52 8:00 p.m. 0 0 28 21 33 33 1 1 0 0 55 9:00 P.M. 0 0 20 15 33 33 0 0 0 0 48 10:00 p.m 0 0 10 8 33 33 0 0 0 0 41 11:00 P.M. 0 0 4 3 26 26 0 0 0 0 1 29 12:00 mid. 0 0 0 0 23 23 0 0 0 0 1 23 Monthly Variations as Percentage of Peak Month Month Residential Retail Indoor Rec. Office Restaurant January 100 65 90 100 80 February 100 65 70 100 75 March 100 70 50 100 90 April 100 70 70 100 90 May 100 70 70 100 95 June 100 75 100 100 100 July 100 75 100 100 100 August 100 75 70 100 85 September 100 75 80 100 80 October 100 75 70 100 80 November 100 80 50 100 80 December 100 100 50 100 90 January 18, 2012 Re: #SP-11-57 & #DR-11-12 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Since .ly, aymond J. Be air Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 3965 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com south �. PLANNING & ZONING December 23, 2011 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the draft agenda for the January 3, 2012 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. The agenda includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846- 4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Since el , R ymond J. Be i Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 0-1 7eA ! southg� PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-- (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑ Administrative V6evelopment Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax ft �es•�GrJ L L �. 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page ft 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): %��,��,� _Z G -3t S$ Dngs-T --7,-e r-T tout. ZuAa�iuora ti I/T 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax ft Z-,-o 30 e5,-T 7� 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: ah eSc7,c)(10 (2~1eq<7- Z2e7' 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3Sd �O12SG=% ��-,�� i se u�.L 2 C/v S 7-a I1 !O T 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): &_e1V-f 73; D11 wi n STE= k- -5 S S's �E•-r o 1) Q t ✓ac b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): � zoo CT c--ko � _ S� c� c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Wo t'7 d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 0eO < /= % _ e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Sia�,rL� STo �l f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): xJo tj t= g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): ]d Sq h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing a 9. ( % / / :t Z-00 sq. ft. Proposed 7-9. (o % l / 3 Zoo sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing '-/!j _% / J !?6 O ;_ sq. ft. Proposed __��% / / 9 G D ?--sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) k10&.1C * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping: $ c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): &/ jp 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 114 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: �T 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: �_k} 14. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES' (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). Not required for Administrative Site Plan Applications Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)2 regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. � �- � d? .9, � ,� �. �4, SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: 11d" Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: U7 Complete mplete Admini ative Officer lbatel The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 2 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") 4 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 �.fl. FENCE Arny Hill PROPOSAL AND 139 Cd Tern I ACCEPTANCE VT 0 II Miltonon,, VT 5468 893-1135 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO DATE ADDRESS PHONE FAX � f, JOB NAME CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: -- s A -- r'� .... i"--.� ___/•%r J/"y �I-'/fl" /.+L... p. t y s" i SYj'( _....__.F,{w ._✓J _ f tCf JCY _I. Wa..:_ . _J '�.t. �" _ ./... _{ ..... .. . ......... Ld }_ .@ etg ,}Fg' ��rM.,..p ... .4 Z_ 8# Y._.._............ A81:-�...... Y�. ��d+1�....sC. �..... 6wv"F�.J. �? .C.. ' d_�.: ......w�.+..+'i. .........A A=-�•...... ..................• Y _______________________________"-."".""."""."-........_______...--."""""."".............".........."-".""-...".."""--""...-__:__.........."."...."....•.....""....""."-..""."..........""•..".""..._.._......_............. � ° :9" !. ____________ ____ _____r.__.Cc! ... 1..,.<:.. ._..___. ::.w[.H°_l`.-.r .__._...............---"......_� .. : i. i ' . ..... e rf + irk l a.LI. `.................................................. .................".............................."................................•..........._ x ............. .�" �} z' -- --- - --"-- r � K. s_ r� . �' �• � ...----"•----""""-"-"--------"-•------ -""•-"------"""""------"""--•............."----"-"""-"-- .....•.... � t. �t ------"-"--"--"-"--"-""""------"•"""-"-"-"--"........................................ ` .--.."--"----"-"..--.-----.--•------------.•----.-"-."--..------.-"-"-------"--------•--•--•- ,� "•"-""•"--""--"""-"-"....._--•••---•-•------...••••-----------------------------------------------•........_..._-•--••_...•--•-----.....--••--•-•••--•••••--• •-••-._.............._......_...._.---------•------------------ ...................................................... ..---"...""""-""-.."....."....."......".......................'••-•---......-•"-••--•---•-•---•-•-•-... ..................................................... We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: � 7 a',,,. _i7r dr f/r,•.n� c�F✓�Y *? (�F" f`�i`+T�} dollars ($ Payment to be made as follows: r Sri f All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike , "' manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifica- Authorized r tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an Signature extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary Insurance. Note: This proposal may be .. 3 Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within _ _-" days. IQ►CCeptanCe of Proposal - The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outline above. Signature-______— IDate of Acceptance _.--.--...__... ----..__—.---------------- _ — Signature.__.___._..-._.__ __.---------_---------._--_--.._.__.__. k 09 'el Oee'&+ iC-iA i(�tl�ctr`f{.s ilc& %(- L co &.5nw , fl. Fesi(-,e 13'1 Codety—wo cA �rt �q 1 14VVI, 0+ South. PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number DR- APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW (NON -SIGN) All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this Application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review bel6re the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only, 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and laxfl) 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 3a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: '�'Sf; !0 Q t V� c . 2 C �►Jc ys S — --- -- 5) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General project description (explain what you want approval for): ��,ai�� /ds �X f S i I ►-=4; �%#k'u t; R �� Ci . K�'QL�,t /.:` i,[.l� i7, �1,=-lam ; s 7) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre -addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 8) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the informatioil required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I 1 11 x 17") of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ___. �SIGNZA—TUR !OF PROPE� TY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: 1'. /Complete Incomplete N 4u Administrative Officer Date, t c The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify apply for, and obtain relevant state, ptrjjjjtv for this prqject. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regi(�al Permit Specialist. Design Review Application Form. Rev, 12-20 10 C� Glesmann Gardens PO Box 545 Hinesburg, VT 05461 (802)272-2683 glesmanngarden@yahoo.com February 22, 2011 LIST OF SHRUBS, (COMMON & LATIN NAME, SIZE PLANTED & FULL GROWN: (6) Rhododendron 'PJM Compact' (26"x26" planted size) (4'x4 full size) 6 qaL . (1) Sunkist Gold Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalis'Sunkist Gold') (43"x43" planted size) (6'x4' full size) 7 9RL. (1) Carol Mackie Daphne (Daphne burkwoodii'Carol Mackie') (1.5'x 2' planted size) (3' x 4' full size) A" (3) Panicule Hydrangea (Hydrangea paniculata'Bombshell') (2'x2' planted size) (3'x 4' full size) 19 19 (3) Magic Carpet Spirea (Spirea japonica 'Magic Carpet') (18" x 18" planted size) (2'x 2' full size) 3 9 4,1. . (7) Saskatoon Boxwood (Buxus x'Saskatoon') (15"x15" planted size) (30"00" full size) F7 %AC.. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PLANTING SPACES: Front: 450 sq ft Back: 108 sq ft VALUE OF EXISTING PLANTING: $213.15 COST OF NEW SHRUBS: $962.70 ESTIMATE FOR TOTAL INSTALLATION: $3,627.25 11/17/2011 Memorandum For: To whom it may concern Subject: Design Review and Site Review Boards Fee of $670.00 From: Leo O. Besaw (Besaw LLQ I'm submitting this request that the fee of $670.00 be reduced to $450.00. 1 realize that the property owned on 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive were in violation of the original application received on 01 March 2011. At that time we had 6 months to comply with that application. The landscaping was accomplished at both sites at the cost of $3600.00 during the June time frame. In review of the original application that was signed on 01 March 2011, I was under the assumption all was good to go, failing to realize I still needed a planting permit and inspection for occupancy within that 6 month window. Needless to say, I now find myself having to resubmit the planting application along with a request to have dumpsters enclosed with appropriate evergreen screening. We have worked diligently to improve the outside condition on both 358 Dorset and 55 San Remo since our purchase of the property in December 2010. The outside improvements have exceeded $9000.00 and we've received numerous comments on buildings appearance. Please take my reduction request under consideration. Thank you for your time Sincerely Leo O. Besaw PJA south n.-t i -H .4 r PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: Sandy Miller, City Manager FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning DATE: November 21, 2011 SUBJECT: 358 Dorset Street Fee Reduction Recommendation Enclosed is a letter of request to reduce a Development Review fee for 3578 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive. This applicant presents unusual circumstances which lead to a relatively minor review having a high required review fee. The application consists primarily of re -approving landscaping modifications whose approvals expired and enclosing dumpsters. Due to the fact that this property is within the Design Review overlay district, the application cannot be reviewed administratively. Elsewhere in the city, the review fee would be $140, plus a $70 after -the -fact fee. Due to the need to go before the DRB and to have design review, the fee is automatically increased to $450 plus an after -the -fact fee of $220.. It is my recommendation that extenuating circumstances exist in this instance, including the fact that the applicant is seeking to remedy violations that were pre-existing at the time of purchase by the current owner. I therefore recommend that the City Manager grant the requested reduction of development review fees by waiving the after -the -fact fee in this instance. The City Manager's authority to grant this reduction is below, excerpted from the Development Review Fee schedule most recently amended by the City Council in April 2007. Reduction or waiver of fees. Fees under this Schedule may be reduced or waived due to extenuating circumstances. An applicant requesting such reduction or waiver shall provide the request in writing to the Director of Planning and Zoning. The Director shall review such requests and provide a written recommendation to the City Manager. The Director may also initiate such a request and recommendation. The City Manager shall review the request and recommendation and make a final determination. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 4 r southburlington PLANNING & ZONING October 18, 2011 Leo 0. Besaw Besaw, LLC 358 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Expiration of #SP-11-11, 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Besaw: Please be advised that site plan approval #SP-11-11 issued to you to revise the landscaping plan for 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive on 3/1/11 has expired. This approval expired due to noncompliance with condition #3 of said decision which required that a zoning permit be issued for this work within six (6) months of the date of the decision. Therefore, you must resubmit a site plan review application for this project as soon as possible. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sinc y aymond J. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com P L A April 21, 2011 Re: #DR-11-01 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a sign permit must be obtained prior to installation of a new sign. If you have any questions, please contact me. cer, 4 SinmRa OBelai _Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 2968 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, V7 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, AICP, Associate Planner RE: Agenda Item #la, Design Review application #DR-11-01, Besaw LLC DATE: March 31, 2011 The enclosed decision was drafted by the Design Review Committee at their meeting on March 28, 2011. They recommend approval by the Development Review Board as a consent item. Besaw LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting an amendment to the master sign permit for the property at 358 Dorset Street. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(d) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of the roofline of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com i lxto f % ; Y A807/49 E1 /49/SWL Model # Color Mounting Light Source Globe Inc CF HID (MH & HPS) Source A 07 -40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, Page 30-41 for arm extension Page 42-44 for post mts. & poles Page 48 for mounting hubs 1 OOW 26W` 35 or 50W' See page 50 810 150W 26, 32 or 42W" 35, 50, 70 or I OOW' A812 200W 26, 32 or 42W" 35, 50, 70 or I OOW' A814 20OW 26, 32 or 42W' 35, 50, 70 or 10OW' 53, 54 55, 'See page 47 for 'See p��e 45-46 for 57, 58, 50, rernote ballasts remote ballasts 60, 61, 62� 63 Accessories See page 49 bit- -/I - al I Existing 96"w x 34.5"h Freestanding sign. with 3 - 90"w x 14" h Tenant plaques. Add tOD caD with LED light fixture. im Proposed Profile (see attached for cap profile) 11 Y - 37.25" x 34" i r) " = 7 1 "%Ar v :t I " h M" = 34" x 26.5" MATTERS "ATTERS" = 82"w x 17"h "home design center" = 115"x 12" home design center Total 50.45 Sq Ft. Al Pj S -I G, Copyright(02011 Sammel Sign Company All Rights Reserved I approve this artwork as submitted. I understand that any changes or corrections after this approval is signed may result in additional charges and I agree to those if necessary. I further understand that the design is the property of Sammcl Sign Company and may not be reproduced without written permission. Approval Signature Date Permit Number DR- - I (office use only) APPLICATION FOR MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT / SIGN DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. Application for: ❑ Initial Master Signage Permit after June 3, 2002 $- Amendment of Master Signage Permit ❑ Individual Sign, pursuant to Master Signage Permit #DR 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) 2-45A40 LLG `34Sg -DQe-SEr- STP&&T .So . Jqa,&1U57a,.J V1— �0 7-- 'if 4, = aSS(7 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) S/ylw z 1*1S sQQO ✓! I /` � r ) 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) 0tAinl Ems. 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) S, .Ujo&j 3.5R J-,?a 5 T 5 724,-- —1 5 a o,e 7a Q V1- a* 2=f5ea5-,25 8' / Sa) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS q&-;5,yw@ ('r1yn&gsr, At &-7-- 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:S,5- ,/�o�; �7,PT �Ii-►]7 5 S Ss�� �y ,i212 . 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General project description (explain what you want approval for): S�nPE�u LED w o L, nt-J !�, 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Sign Ordinance. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. 0 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SI NATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for; and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Master Signage Permit Form. Rev. 12-2010 Master Signage for 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive Besaw LLC (c) Color and Texture Free standing sign at 358 Dorset Street overall height from ground level is 92". Overall Dimensions of posts will be 5"x12"79"H - not to include roof. Freestanding sign at 55 San Remo Drive. Overall height from ground level is 92". Overall dimensions posts will be 5"x12"79"H - to match sign at 358 Dorset Street. Sign colors will stay as is: black posts, red background sign with white lettering. Roof will be the same black as posts. (d) Material Used Roof will be constructed from 14 gauge steel; primed and painted black. Roof will be removable to accomplish LED maintenance. Posts will be enclosed with Azek composite material. (e) Wall Mounted Signs Existing shrubbery will be removed and new landscaping accomplished. Landscape profile will not exceed 30"h from ground level. From ground level to the bottom of lettering "Home Design Center" will be 6 feet. March 1, 2011 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincere , Dymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburf.com PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP---d - (ofce use oily) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑ Administrative K Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax ft. - L l 2 SR -Do -r STE-r lw �Tn%j V -j— SO Z- S-16 �'- �S Sr 1 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Naive, mailing address, phone and fax ft 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone &fax #): (J, �� � 3S--_fie &T S-rff& T V1 —�02- !je. s- .1 r a rz 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: & 66pLje,,ss; „JcT 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 2)a2SE1- s70g!-2T ,hn �S Ss}ti (�r7wo DY2, So, uIV- . V7- 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): t: a r �L�1�i•—rt�T;�Z.7Tl�(ci:��1�C�i.�l�J.i�1s�` �s x-b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 3s D,,Qs&-r 'W000 Si T .yF c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): -0 P, g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / Proposed % / sq. ft. sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: o 93 D — / cd 3 co 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: j�,,�u — s'.aTV&Da 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:,a u Z o 1 1 14. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). Not required for Administrative Site Plan Applications 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)2 regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. ca_ , IGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete 4 /)n AI Incomplete inistrati,fe Officer Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 2 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 M55ii EL-- �AYMM&q(3)! PJM ?J M C3) iv tzv I iF'OIJNT7xjtq GRpSS LB) MIXi�D (32) v S-TREET- I)CSicin 3�5 5 8 F--,) s Bvp"I-�r\jtonyr -Aes\yeA t,,�- Hei4l*C3Lesmaj�vN 6115MAKDENS cz��-N A�/a if = 1 1--^ i 1ea.sSmJ IJAII Glesmann Gardetis 5 f LR U B S.- PJM Rhododendron (5'x 4') Blooms mid to late April Arborvitae 'Sunkist Gold' (6'x4') Evergreen Spirea'Magic Carpet' Blooms Spring- Fall � t- -', S') v mzm��� Carol Mackie Daphne (3'x 4') Blooms in May Hydrangea paniculata 'Bombshell' (Y x 4') Blooms early summer - frost 0 • ! i PO Box 545 Hinesburg,vr 05461 (802)272-2683 glesm,inngarden@yahoo.com Boxwood 'Saskatoon' (30"x 3') Evergreen shrub R EJAI� 0 L R .- I >- GLEJMAWGPK'��-Ns Glesmann Gardens PO Box 545 f ti7wsburg, VT 0546t (802)272-2683 < IesntanngardenC(Pyahoo.coin Myrtle or Periwinkle (Vinca minor) Blooms in Spring Evergreen ground cover Full size (5"tall x creeping), planted as 5" bare root Quantity: 500 bare root Dwarf Fountain Grass (Pennisetum alopecu- roides 'Hameln') Perennial ornamental grass Full size (30"tall x 30"wide), planting size (2 gallon) Glesmann Gardens Saskatoon Boxwood (Buxus x'Saskatoon') Evergreen shrub Full size (30" tall x 3' wide) Planted size (5 gallon) Quantity: 7 1a t Glesmann Gardens Rhododendron'PJM Compact" (same latin name) Blooms mid to late April Broadleaf evergreen shrub Full size (4'tall x 4' wide), planted size ( 5 gallon) Quantity: 6 Sunkist Gold Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalis'Sunkist Gold') Coniferous evergreen Full size (6'tall x 4' wide) Planted size ( 7 gallon) Quantity: _ 1 Page 3 Glesma'nn Gardens Carol Mackie Daphne (Daphne burkwoodii 'Carol Mackie') Semi -evergreen shrub Blooms in May Full size ( 3' tall x 4' wide) Planted size ( ball and burlap 18-24") Quantity: 1 Panicule Hydrangea (Hydrangea paniculata'Bomb- shell') Dwarf deciduous shrub Blooms early summer- frost Full size (3' tall x 4' wide) Planted size (2 gallon) Quantity: 3 Glesmann Gardens Magic Carpet Spirea ( Spirea japonica 'Magic Carpet') Dwarf flame Spirea Blooms early summer - fall Full size (18-24" tall & wide) Planted size ( 3 gallon) Quantity: 3 f"11 C 5 ! V / . 4`TF 9 III i'�4 i F ■ �,:''. � ei *sics >1JFFt South PROJECT MD:ryluSk ,� F ..:,�J7 R�' SITE a. K!IiI 1 64 \I.o* - .'n / (YV ,ri g "{.`Y 't4 ' 19 • k• S N N 10.4436' E �cB RIM : 99.2 23. N/F CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY INC. - / \a •,� -� 1 ('J) YY hM N1.O.oeMReNt. w Mupl• $ 7 8�... s yr .�.,,. -34,07• E _ REMOVE EXISTING GATE A�MOVE WEED ,) y T I� j _ 160.32• EX: A/C REPAIR FENCE 'Ri ES W YC JuMAwIs F REMOVE it RELOCATE �-o-, a N 11•0$'S3• £ REUSE 5' CEOAR REUSE (2) DENSE ('� i.�Tloo C(aatPeLtiNi�hGS B 'moo....., p_o. _SOL 14,00' ` ` YEWS, 2' & 2. ��"t„1 `73,00• FUTURE A/C � STOCKADE FENCE STONE PAD, AND 1._F=�EN�' DOWNIiX�Ir CIGL PSO°Q"�R°''� RETAIL SPACE / ,/ i�. + + APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE TYPICAL OF (4) j B 5100 SF Woods us M "'a �� a—P—o— o -o— CHAINLINK FENCE �W SNOW STORAGE —�� (gp+JO• •r�Nsk-cARrcr• e 1 Story Bldg. 11 /^ `�RER` APPROX. CENTERLINE L c POD p `� n \.J`J�I�.J�,J�J TREE LINE ? D \ NEW.B" CURB I REMOVEIL -G""( ) i --- (7 a; AFL. EL. - 100,00, DOWNCAST ENTRANCE : EXISTINGI I �.,,� �_` /-102---- EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR LIGHTS TYPICAL OF (6) RETAIL SPACE I BUILDINq n" �.�T7-...,^---� ;�. ' ) I , I' u K 2900 SF I CONSTRICT /T7` S I NEW*S. SEWER LINE PARKIN I I / Crital� !� I I / I D - DRAINAGE LINE �., 9' Prc ututty LOT J OONINCAST WALLPACK FU R T 5Pq - ' � a TYP,CA.L 0: (4) . URF CES I S(�� 0 IRON ROD FOUND - BENT p)Yz' d�wk rt ro d It \ ro o S< ), I _ L. L.. - FUTURE SIDEWALK I� _ 99e" ,v IDf,y ry NEW (TYP. OF 3) NEW AICH BASIN PHAN SPORTS, INC. '/ Pavenent' -- - A 'NAIL FOUND _ NEW 5'X70'- 1 7 1 I I r I''•.( NEW CON(. 4r`* CANOPY I '"� �� PRO'OSEp /a t blt Lo w aiy.T. �l Ii [iY CITY ,Om 00.15'13• ; ILK .�•N SIDEW V INV.9q.50 I .�I BILLIARD CLUB ) �o� l ll� •a DOWNCAST LIGHTS COMBINATION POLE R = 22967,32' a NEW 4• 9gg 50 5200 SF w c ► GROUND LIGHTS N S R 39 NEW \ EL. = 10� 7' 5200 SF 4( TYPICAL OF (4) L 101J0' ' ate, PVC CONCR A I� ,� S' LIGHT c , c Rln • 99a• ElF IDEW BIKE RACK o OS SEWER MANHOLE SPACES cwc: Pad cBmNEW CON C- C i w RELOCATE (2) P,IM 13 CATCH BASIN f on cK I, SIDE RH ODODENDRON Bit. Conc. Pavement RQ 8E 9i 00 \ `\�. WALK ,y: e+ Jp3� 1 GO' MAPLE' .DECIDUOUS TREE ~ �0'ti CB Rln 993' OW ` JI LU .� r Inv m • 9S 2 \ ~ \ f s r_ `LANDSCAPING SCH ULE: 75.3 CB Rln • 100.z• HC OWNER SHALL REPLACE BIRCH EIL 1n • 9s.ze \ I �k R� ('w r. I WITH 3"-3.5 CHANTICLEER �ewai \ \\�'����✓✓1 4'� j �j CALLERv PEAR PYRUS CALLERYANA D = "KELSEYS COMPACT" DOGWOOD (11) '� _ Y ?w I r t j o� 94 'CHANTICLEER AFTER CONSTRUCTION " H =HOLLY BLUE PRINCESS' (2) a'ft 2EN0 OF NEW NG� �,,o \4 SPACES I ic.-v- L7 OF NEW MUNICIPAL SIDEWALK BY OTHERS. "BLUE PRINCE" (1) K "KNOCKOUT ROSE" (13) - . —•-. _ I+J P = POTENTILLA "GOLDFINGER" (7) / Pan Olf In9 rea N 7B'3 / / 7 - .EE DWARF HYDRANGEA (1) 4'0 6 SPACES R PO = RHODO. PEE -GEE "PJM ELITE" 9 336,3p ( Bit. Conc. Pavement WI ,Q W WEIGELA 'NE & ROSES" (5). 1 Story BIdB.. '�• Ir -- CUT BACK EXISTING( CURB FOR PARALLF� ! SURVEYOR'S NOTES PARKIN SPACE I / 1. THIS IS NOT A PROPERTY SURVEY, APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN Bit Conc. Pavement ¢ a , - I �,,; '' �'�•, 1 ARE BASED ON A DISTURBED (BENT) IRON ROD -FOUND ALONG SAN REMO ROAD: NAILS WEREFOUNDALONG DORSET STREET BUT DID NOT MATCH THE DEEDED' - W a r ? r� I L FRONTAGE OF 125 FEET. Y c 2. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT DETERMINED. INVERTS OF MUNSON , ` , 1 _ I aU r DRAINAGE LINES WITHIN THE CATCH BASINS TO BE CHECKED AT A LATER DATE. N/F a. a° U THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SEWER, WATER, DRAINAGE, GAS AND OTHER Oeq SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY ane vlon _i ai w y UTILITY LINES TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK. Co. cone. cwrn /,�� 3.THE UTILITY BOXES IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING ALONG DORSET STREET ARE EXTERIOR LIGHTING TO BE APPROVED, BY CITY OF ' SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT TO GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER AND NEW ENGLAND OWNER' & APPLICANT: SOUTH BURLINGTON DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE IN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH. THIS EASEMENT IS 1B' WIDE (EAST -WEST) AND 13' WIDE (NORTH -SOUTH). OTHER EASEMENTS ON THIS PROPERTY MAY EXIST BUT DEED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. PATRICK MALONE ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX D OF THE LAND I /'/-SMH REM roar AND PLAN RESEARCH ON THIS 'PROPERTY AND ABUTTORS WAS NOT DONE. - MALONE PROPERTIES - NEW LOCUST -: 4. THE VERTICAL DATUM WAS ASSUMED AS 1D0.00' (BUILDING FLOOR) 122 GALLISON HILL ROAD REMOVE PINE MONTPELIER, VT 05602 LOT AREA = 44,564 SF 1.02 ACRES EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 17, ,20 SF 29.6 COVERAGE Anproved by resolution of the Development p r- r, / C D PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 13,2D0 SF = 29.6% COVERAGE Review Board, The City of South Burlington, R E C C V E ��tE� EHQ FRONT. YARD = 2500 SF DORSET STREET 928 SF IMPV. = 37.1 9 9 FRONT YARD 875 SF SAN REMO DRIVE 536 SF IMPV. 65.8 % 5 P �' Vermont on •the l i� day of t " F.. � r -v* * o �` ZONING DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT 2 60qsub qp 2.� 2011If 4 OVERLAY DESIGN DISTRICT 2 subject to the re _ pirements of said a�4( <" EXISTING GREEN AREA = 8656 SF = 19.4% con itionS Of Said re50lutidn. Signed this EXISTING PAVED AREA = 18664 SF = 41.9% A 41 >♦ a j GRAPHIC SCALE PROPOSED GREEN AREA = 7710 SF = 17.3% D da Ofh ,005� by n oyg.City of �o5 / PROPOSED PAVED AREA = 19602 SF = 44.0% -� SQ. BV��np?r, �F V�Q� PARKING SPACES = 48 + 2 HC 50 SPACES f .„.Irman o k !p 1 (e FEET It. KEfJUC_r rb>z 9 c 9 O O Q Z O W ::5 : W \ino W W O � Q W W — W _ O Q N m � D O 00 Q 5 DESCRIPTION PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROJECT ND. DATE - 04008 16 SEP 2004 SCALE DRAWN DRRAWN C 1. 0 W/RSD CHECKED SHEET 1 OF 1 Glesmann Gardens PO Box 545 Hinesburg, yr 05461 (802)272-2683 glesmanngarden@yahoo.com. Design Matters Garden Install Estimate Plant Materials FRONT: *Shrubs: $698.80 *Vinca: $250.00 OR Geranium 'Ballerina', 'Striatum' and Armeria 'Bloodstone : * Dwarf Fountain Grass: $233.10 TOTAL: $1,181.90 OR $1,303.10 Plant Materials BACK: * Shrubs (Boxwood): $263.90 Other Materials: Compost: (5 yards) $230.00 Mulch: (4 yards) $180.00 LABOR: Includes removing existing yews, plant bed preparation, amending soil, pick up plant material/other materials, planting, hauling away debris, watering, mulching and clean up. $1,650.25 Glesmann Gardens ESTIMATE GRAND TOTAL: (includes front and back plantings) $3,506.05 or $'027.25 Glesmann Gardens PO 15ox 545 UIi1)04burg, VT05461 (80-2) 272-2683 s;l(��manngarden(a?yahooxom February 22, 2011 LIST OF SHRUBS, (COMMON & LATIN NAME, SIZE PLANTED & FULL GROWN: (6) Rhododendron'PJM Compact' (26"x26" planted size) (4'x4 full size) (1) Sunkist Gold Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalis'Sunkist Gold') (43"x43" planted size) (6'x4' full size) (1) Carol Mackie Daphne (Daphne burkwoodii'Carol Mackie') (1.5'x 2' planted size) (3' x 4' full size) (3) Panicule Hydrangea (Hydrangea paniculata 'Bombshell') (2'x2' planted size) (3'x 4' full size) (3) Magic Carpet Spirea (Spires japonica 'Magic Carpet') (18" x 18" planted size) (2'x 2' full size) (7) Saskatoon Boxwood (Buxus x'Saskatoon') (15"x15" planted size) (30"00" full size) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PLANTING SPACES: Front: 450 sq ft Back: 108 sq ft VALUE OF EXISTING PLANTING: $213.15 COST OF NEW SHRUBS: $962.70 ESTIMATE FOR TOTAL INSTALLATION: $3,627.25 C I Glesmann Gardens Pk) 11(1\ 545 11111V.Sb rrg, VT05461 (802) 272-2683 i;lu,�manngarden((,'yahoc).com February 22, 2011 LIST OF SHRUBS, (COMMON & LATIN NAME, SIZE PLANTED & FULL GROWN: (6) Rhododendron'PJM Compact' (26"x26" planted size) (4'x4 full size) (1) Sunkist Gold Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalis'Sunkist Gold') (43"x43" planted size) (6'x4' full size) (1) Carol Mackie Daphne (Daphne burkwoodii 'Carol Mackie') (1.5'x 2' planted size) (3' x 4' full size) (3) Panicule Hydrangea (I lydrangea paniculata'Bombshell') (2'x2' planted size) (3'x 4' full size) (3) Magic Carpet Spirea (Spirea japonica 'Magic Carpet') (18" x 18" planted size) (2'x 2' full size) (7) Saskatoon Boxwood (Buxus x'Saskatoon') (15"05" planted size) (30"00" full size) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PLANTING SPACES: Front: 450 sq ft Back: 108 sq ft VALUE OF EXISTING PLANTING: $213.15 COST OF NEW SHRUBS: $962.70 [ STIMATE FOR TOTAL INSTALLATION: $3,627.25 Glesmann Gardens PO Box 545 Hinesburg, VT 05461 (802)272-2683 glesm an ngarden(Y)yahco.com WK , PERENNIALS: Geranium'Striatum'(same latin name) Blooms May - June Perennial Full size (Vtall x1'wide), planted size (5"x5") Geranium 'Ballerina' (Same latin name) Blooms May- June Perennial Full size (Vtall xVwide), planted size (5"x 5") Dwarf Seathrift (Armeria 'Bloodstone') Blooms April -May, Perennial Full size (10"tall x10"wide) planted size (VxV) C Glesmann Gardens Myrtle or Periwinkle (Vinca minor) Blooms in Spring Evergreen ground cover Full size (5"tall x creeping), planted as 5" bare root Quantity: 500 bare root Dwarf Fountain Grass (Pennisetum alopecu roides 'Hameln') Perennial ornamental grass Full size (30"tall x 30"wide), planting size (10"x10") Quantity:18 Glesmann Gardens -SHRUBS Rhododendron TJM Compact" (same latin name) Blooms mid to late April Broadleaf evergreen shrub Full size (4'tall x 4' wide), planted size (26"x26") Quantity: 6 !11 Sunkist Gold Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalis 'Sunkist Cold') Coniferous evergreen Full size (6'tall x 4' wide) Planted size (43" x 33") Quantity: 1. l■ Glesmann Gardens Carol Mackie Daphne (Daphne burkwoodii 'Carol Mackie') Semi -evergreen shrub Blooms in May Full size ( 3' tall x 4' wide) Planted size (1.5' x 2') Quantity:1 Kill Panicule Hydrangea (Hydrangea pan icu lata 'Bomb- shell') Dwarf deciduous shrub Blooms early summer- frost Full size (3' tall x 4' wide) Planted size (2' x 2') Quantity: 3 Glesmann Gardens Magic Carpet Spirea ( Spirea japonica, 'Magic Carpet') Dwarf flame Spirea Blooms early summer - fall Full size (18-24" tall & wide) Planted size 18" x 18") Quantity: 3 Glesmann Gardens Saskatoon Boxwood (Buxus x'Saskatoon') Evergreen shrub Full size (30" tall x 3' wide) Planted size (15" x 15") Quantity: 7 a T I rm �Gd f Design Signs Inc. 644 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 1048 Williston, VT 05495 Belair From: coughIin4@charter.net Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:08 AM To: rbelair@sburl.com Cc: jhinds@sburl.com; clarose@sburl.com Subject: Application for 358 Dorset Street Mr. Belair: After careful review and lengthily discussions with several parties, the Salvation Army has decided to rescind it's application for review for the Pat Malone property located at 358 Dorset Street. This application, set to come before the Development Review Board of the City of South Burlington on November 7, 2006, is to be removed from consideration. The Salvation Army appreciates the time and effort that the staff and zoning board members of the City of South Burlington has devoted to this application and we thank them for their clear communication throughout this process. Good health and prosperity, Michael Coughlin Business/Development Director Salvation Army Burlington Corps 802-864-6991 x 105 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & 'ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 2, 2006 Michael Coughlin The Salvation Army PO Box 5120 Burlington, VT 05402-5120 Re: 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Coughlin: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, November 7., 2006 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOi-4 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 October 23, 2006 Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Dear Property Owner: j6hAtW AXe"' Jfiva7�� Enclosed is a draft agenda for the November 7, 2006 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, 1`�k* �D Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Mike Coughlin CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 October 23, 2006 Champlain Oil Co. PO Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the November 7, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts your property. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. C 66q-D,mi�>(ao 6,190- 00354,e OS-4p-Cp3S'1 cl v5-io- 003(-a5 Pu.tk e.-CcQ Dr Lc6by-le- Ailk� ea p 5&c2- 1 1 JOHN E RL LER RENOE O M RETZ COMMANDER GENERAL � TERRITORIAL COMMANDER THE SALVATION ARMY FOUNDED IN 1865 BY WILLIAM BOOTH GREATER BURLINGTON AREA MAJORS DAVID AND KARIN DICKSON CORPS COMMANDING OFFICERS 64 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 5120 BURLINGTON, VT 05402 TELEPHONE (802) 864-6991 FAX (802) 864-9256 ADVISORY BOARD Chairman Robert Woodworth Memo of UnderstandingVice Chair Herman Thomas Treasurer Kyle Sowles Secretary William Finnigan From: Michael Coughlin/Salvation Army 802-864-6991 x 105 David Ashley Theresa Benoit ' Ray Cooper Mike Date: October 16, 2006 ucasngham William Erdmannn Re: SITE PLAN REVIEW - 358 Dorset Street ' Leroy Furman ,.an Henshaw John Outwater David Roberts Gordon Root Kyle KevinSpllane Where: 358 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 ' Joann Stanfield ' Robert Stanfield Herman Thomas Marti Tourville What: It is that the Salvation Army, Burlington Corps, Robert Woodworth proposed Steven Unsworth open a Thrift Store and Processing Center at 358 Dorset ' Emeritus Street in the new City Center of the City of South Burlington. Proposed: In order to meet our operational needs and the guidelines for the City Center, the Salvation Army must install a Fence Blind (20'W x 72'L x 14'H) on the East side of 358 Dorset Street, inside this blind will be a trailer, a small dock and our dumpsters. This Fence Blind (green sample included) will match the existing color of the exterior - a brownish red. (This is a special order color and will be ordered upon ON, approval) This Fence Blind will consume 8 parking spaces Unit pdW ay and mask the trailer, small dock and dumpsters. "Remember The Salvation Army in Your Will" 1 � JOHGENRALARSOCtobe/E,ZII MAANNETZ DER THE SALVATION ARMY FOUNDED IN 1865 BY WILLIAM BOOTH GREATER BURLINGTON AREA MAJORS DAVID AND KARIN DICKSON CORPS COMMANDING OFFICERS 64 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 5120 BURLINGTON, VT 05402 TELEPHONE (802) 864-6991 FAX (802) 864-9256 ADVISORY BOARD Chairman Robert Woodworth Additional The property owner will install a door at the NE corner of Vice Chair Needs: the building. Herman Thomas Treasurer Kyle Sowles why: It is the intent of the Salvation Army to operate a Showcase Secretary William Finnigan Store at this site and join in the development and exciting future of this shared use City Center of South Burlington. David Ashley The' Ben With larger RayrCooperolt the available retail space (current store has 2,200 MikLuaD aarsngham sq ft of retail, proposed store will have 5,000 sq ft of retail), ' Robert Erdman William Finnigan we will be able to offer our usual items as well as furniture ' Leroy Furman ,.an Henshaw exercise equipment, in fitting, better displayed Outwat John utwater etc an more be David Roberts environment. Gordon Kyle Sowles Kevin Spillane ' Joann Stanfield ' Robert Stanfield Herman Thomas Marti Tourville Robert Woodworth Steven Unsworth Emeritus I On;, United Way MEMBER AGENCY 2 "Remember The Salvation Army in Your Will" Permit Number SP- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Patrick Malone, 122 Gallison Hill Rd., Montpelier, VT 05602 Off ao • 223 Q54 Rax • 2299009—CAI 7930179 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 666, pages 681-684 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Major David Dickson, Salvation Army Burlington Corps., 64 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05401 Office: 864-6991 Fax: 864-9256 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): inicnaei Uougnlin, balvation Army, 64 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05401 Office: 864-6991 x 105 Fax:Xg 864-9256 Cel : 518-726-6552 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 358 Dorset Street A; 5� San Remo Drive, South Burlington VT. 054U3 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) Map 25, Lot 16 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 8, 000 Retai l and 5200 recreation/entertainment b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Same as above NOTE: It is proposed to install a Fence Blind outside the East side of 358 Dorset St. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 13,200 Existing* 13,900 Proposed NO CHANGES d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Existing single floor; Proposed singel Floor XQ XgMjpgM NO CHANGES e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N?A f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Proposed 3 cffiup, 5 non —office 1 company vehicle g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Shard Parking Analysis is attached since Fence Blind will remove aizailable spaces on. a2st side of 3 ration are gam to 5- mm, M—S, No Simrla-V hours 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 44,564 Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing 29.6 % / 13,200 sq. ft. Proposed 29 b % / 13,2()() sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing a _7—% / �6T$ F sq. ft. Proposed Q , % / , 1� Oct_ sq. ft. 1.9% 875 sq. ft San Remo Dr. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 5.6 % / 2500 sq. ft. Dorset St Proposed % sq. ft. SAME AS A gvE d) Total area to be disturbed during construction sq. �:f� 1,440 sq ft (area inside blind) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 1,200 Door b) Landscaping: c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Fence Bl i nd — . 1 2 , 000 small dock 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC _ SEE ATTACHED REPORT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: +:OO1PM 2 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Saturday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: December 2006 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. OF APPLICANT TURE OF -PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: l �C�A`(✓ REVIEW AUTHORITY: ?I/Development Review Board ❑ Administrative ative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑Complete ❑ Incomplete 9�u�, /v, Planning & Zoning or Designee 4 Patrick Malone Prepared by: Richard S. DeWolfe, P.E. Shared Parking Analysis DeWolfe Engineering Associates, Inc. 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 14-Oct-06 Building Use Size Occupancy Peak Parking Weekday Morning Weekday Lunch Weekday Afternoon (10-11am) (12-2 pm) (3-5 pm) _ 1000 SF Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Retail 8 n/a 5 40 0.5 20 0.75 30 0.7 28 Amusement 5.2 60 3/space 20 0 0 0.4 8 0.4 8 Total Spaces Required 60 20 38 36 Weekday Evening Weekday Late Night Weekday Early Morning (7-9 pm) (9pm-2 arn) (2am-9am) Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces 0 0 0 0 0.2 4 0.5 10 0.5 i0 0 0 Total Spaces Required 10 10 4 Building Use Size Occupancy Peak Parking Saturday Midday Saturday Saturday Saturday (12-2 pm) (2-4 pm) (6-8 pm) (8pm-2am) ..., 1000 SF Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Retail 8 n/a 5 40 0.7 28 0.75 30 0.2 8 0 0 Amusement 5.2 60 3/space 20 0.4 8 0.6 12 1 20 0.75 15 Total Spaces Required 60 36 42 28 15 Sunday Midday Sunday Sunday Sunday (12-2 am) (2-4 pm) (6-8 pm) (8pm-2am) Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 8 0.5 10 0.8 16 0.5 10 Total Spaces Required 8 10 16 10 Skim 79 f 0 r -Vir I k` y I � T la Replace existing sign with new sign lk REMOVE h RELOCA EXISTING PLANTINGS DOWNCAST UGRITS a TYPICAL OF (4) 11 o` ,X- y a C 41 RIM v42' -Ae Mute 9 � (A K Aw >✓ RETAIL SPACE 5100 SF 1 Story &dg. FL. EL. = IO0.00' DOWNCAST ENTRANCE LIGHTS TYPICAL OF (6) —Hy 1rt.A,.-ems 5 ! IB SPACES Hit. Conc. Povenent Cs s ., Im out - (�fYwSouth b PROJECT ry w� l ,, �.:Bt�$n SITEF NA CHAMP Syr LAiN qE COMPANy INC 1 REMOVE EXISTING GATE REMOVE WEED'• A 1 • 1 ,� e x "'. EX. A/C REPAIR FENCE TREES REUSE 5' CEDAR REUSE (2) DENSE InSW I new sign 101 YENS. 2' k 2' o � FUTURE A/C / SYOCKA[E FEN(I. STONE PAD, AND LL6LND. APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE NEW 6' CURB REMOVE \ IOU EXISTIN RETAIL SPACE BUILDIN 3 2yyDg CONSTR NEW CT ; PARKINC DOWNCAST WALLPACK 5 LOT _. TYPICAL OF (4) - F11 UP,E' NEW 5'%10' I )H I AI'T CANOPY PROPOSED a Bit. (IOU. OF 3) NEW Al. NA PHAN SPORTS, INC. PAv INVB ' 'S90y BILLIARD CLUB NEW E _ / CRETE !C'O-- 7' FF=1W.B ,IDEWA, �- C�q 1 wr Bit. Conc.. Plver t B SACES 1 Story Bldg. JG3 a CURBOR FPARALLE PARKIN SPACE / I Bit. Cont. Povenent ��- + p gQ O DBA MUNSON DBA 5'gETN BORLWGTON F a g REALTY CO. [Aluw Vnn cam. nes o OWNER & APPLICANT; EXTERIOR LIGHTING TO BE APPROVED BY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DESIGN REVIEW COMLIITTEE IN PATRICK MALONE ACCORDANCE VAIN APPENDIX D OF THE LAND DEVELWMENI REGULATIONS OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. MALONE PROPERTIES 122 GALLISON HILL ROAD NEW r Locusr MONTPELIER. VT 05602 REMOVE PINE LOT AREA = 44,564 SF = 1.02 ACRES EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 17, 244 SF = 38.7% COVERAGE PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 13,200 SF = 29.6% COVERAGE FRONT YARD = 2500 SF DORSET STREET 928 SF IMPV. = 37.1 % FRONT YARD = 875 SF SAN REMO DRIVE 536 SF IMPV. = 65.8 % ZONING DISTRICT. CENTRAL DISTRICT 2 OVERLAY DESIGN DISTRICT 2 EXISTING GREEN AREA = 8656 SF = 19.4% EXISTING PAVED AREA = 18664 SF = 41.9% PROPOSED GREEN AREA = 7710 SF = 17.3% PROPOSED PAVED AREA = 19602 SF = 44.0% PARKING SPACES = 48 + 2 HC — 50 SPACES �— CHAINLINK FENCE APPROX. CLNTERLINE o k-k-k- -k-A-1 TREE LINE 102 EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR $ SEWER LINE O DRAINAGE UNE O IRON ROD FO[: ND - BENT FUTURE SIDEWALK ♦ NAIL FOUND BY CITY COMBINATION POLE a DOWNCAST LIGHTS GROUND LIGHTS TYPICAL OF (4) BIKE RACK # UGHT O$ SEWER MANHOLE R .00ATE (2) P3M CATCH BASIN R ODODENDRON - ®E YAK OEGDUOU$ TREE W OWNER SHALL REPLACE BIRCH LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE: Of WITH 3'-3-5' CHANTICLEER Q CALLERY PEAR, PYRES CALLERYANA 0 :-KELSEYS COMPACY DOGWOOD (11) 'CHANTICLEER' AFTER CONSTRUCTION El- HOLLY "BLUE PRINCESS" (2) C3 OF NEW MUNICIPAL SIDEWALK BY OTHERS. BLUE PRINCE' (1) Y K - 'KNOCKOUT ROSE- (13) c y. -W P - POTENTILLA 'GOLDFINGER' (T) ry""Remove existing Sign PG - HODD. E DWARF HYDRANGEA (1) Z fl - RMOUO. 'PJM ELITE" (8) y W _ WOCELA 'WINE h ROSES' (5) SURVEYOR'S NOTESA ` 1. THIS 11 NOT A 11219PERTY SURVEY, APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON A DISTURBED (BENT) IRON ROD FOUND ALONG SAN REMO ROAD NAILS WERE FOUND ALONG DORSET STREET BUT DID NUT MATCH THE DEEDED FRONTAGE OF 125 FEET. 2. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT DETERMINED. INVERTS OF NA _ DRAIGE LINES WITHIN THE CATCH BASINS TO BE CHECKED AT A LATER DATE. THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SEVER, WATER, DRAINAGE. GAS AND OTHER y UTILITY LINES TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK. 3. THE UTILITY BOXES IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING ALONG DORSET STREET ARE SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT TO GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER AND NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH- THIS EASEMENT IS 18' VIDE (EAST -VEST) AND 13' VIDE (NDRTH-SOUTH). OTHER EASEMENTS ON THIS PROPERTY KAY EXIST BUT DEED �MW RM - 0" AND PLAN RESEARCH ON THIS PROPERTY AND ABUTTURS WAS NOT DOHS s 4. THE VERTICAL DATUM WAS ASSUMED AS 100.00' (BUILDING FLOOR) GRAPHIC SCALE W � S Q O \ � Z Fo� w _ 3 0 �(7 QI3 V 1 O E— O >_ NW F 1 1 0 z 0 Z o� W LEI W \ M o W I d' W W O —1 � D Q Q U)m �= z (n F O OQ o vcn txscWruou PROPOSED SITE PLAN Mrt?KLT N0. 040CS INIE 16 SEP 2004 ScuE O W/RSD c:Kaeo 4e:K :i> T OF 1 Patrick Malone Prepared by: Richard S. DeWolfe, P.E. Shared Parking Analysis DeWolfe Engineering Associates, Inc. 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 14-Oct-06 Building Use Size Occupancy Peak Parking Weekday Morning Weekday Lunch Weekday Afternoon (10-11am) (12-2 pm) (3-5 pm) 1000 SF Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Retail 8 n/a 5 40 0.5 20 0.75 30 0.7 28 Amusement 5.2 60 3/space 20 0 0 0.4 8 0.4 8 Total Spaces Required 60 20 38 36 Weekday Evening Weekday Late Night Weekday Early Morning (7-9 pm) (9pm-2 am) (2am-9am) Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces 0 0 0 0 0.2 4 0.5 10 0.5 10 0 0 Total Spaces Required 10 10 4 Building Use Size Occupancy Peak Parking j Saturday Midday Saturday Saturday Saturday (12-2 pm) (2-4 pm) (6-8 pm) (8pm-2am) 1000 SF Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces atio Spaces Ratio Spaces Retail 8 n/a 5 40 0.7 28 0.75 30 0.2 8 0 0 Amusement 5.2 60 3/space 20 0.4 8 0.6 12 , 1 20 0.75 15 Total Spaces Required 60 36 42 28 15 Sunday Midday Sunday (12-2 am) (2-4 pm) Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces 0 0 0 0 0.4 8 0.5 10 Total Spaces Required 8 10 Sunday (6-8 pm) Ratio Spaces 0 0 0.8 16 16 Sunday (8pm-2am) Ratio Spaces 0 0 0.5 10 10 Patrick Malone Shared Parking Analysis 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT Prepared by: Richard S. DeWolfe, P.E. . DeWolfe Engineering Associates, Inc. 18-Sep-04 621MAIIIIIIIIN MALONE PROPERTIES 122 Gallison Hill Rd. Montpelier, Vermont 05602 May 26, 2005 Ray Belair City of South Burlington Dear Ray: As a condition of my permit at SS San Remo Drive, I needed to seek approval of the exterior wall lights. I am including the photometrics as well as the specifications on the wall units. These would mount on the wall facing the new parking lot as depicted on the approved site plan.. n etely, Patrick Malone K J� ti Email: patrlck(§togethernet 802-223-9954 • Fax. 802-229-9009 • Cell: 802-793-0179 Commercial Real Estate I Leasing l Development CATALOG NCr. TYPE NC. WPC Cut -Off Series Walrprism ORDERING INS©RMA ION, Catalog Number: Examolc WPC160LXLPCB•B JOB NANIE WPCI AA A. FPX'IYRE ; WPC• �Sf,ULAMP PC! OP T10N Cut'�ft WATTIDE LX•MIc1, LAMP Fs•Sfngle fusing VOLTAGI ; Y'da4; risrti Pressure Vixiures 120V 277V 1-1204• , y 5t 50tM' ;HFFJ"• lur'4r100 e401 vin FFS•Ooub!e 2.241V 7p•7011' NLX•klp!r Prnss�t'e fusing 3.240V WACO* Sodium 249V 4-2T7V 150.1SOri" (lJPF) 410V a-120V MA -Metal Hale Pce•litdor type 2110to4oetrol fo, 206V �MJ(-HPei 123U..0A. 2'77V 240V 217V voltage) '35W, 5OW,, 1OOW aaoil$At .n MIgij Preocure Sfodijrn ON!/. "76W. IDOW. ISOW Avrilablp Jnly. ••' 35W, SOW, 70tk (N"I, 1O04V {NF'F), 160W (NAAvailable tM ontr, Motel Halide jfi44 available 1,1 120V ar i77V ACCE,SSQR_fl P19DM•Lt;i1t Ieye,G''r-�'0ir�;,nrrol2(,$V-2774 PIIDA•PDencll PnOloWtIP'01 fOr 120V P150A-P"Gtoc�� ,tro. ipr 12C% 'WPC'r55P-R6p aeerrar' IerS, HNILAL WFO� f.kL - Wpe ii cturss tw jiree a rrsdi,.m oese lar,p, High PreSsui6 SodiuH" UNt5 utb E 17 crerar larnp, nrl lal Nibkl# UMN ',se E C117 I&rp Not rat tise in c&r.,vasnes 0,1 ct:-& aralas :I,at may 2L-tl ,err rt8', ua Lct.t istr- . a 2-15 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS • $tonco 4 , 4t•GtE UVail17"'C 1'i ;s cy@41 `or araunc cW%I(ns perir!18i6rE• ,d661 !0' RaatawliV lig,ting w'r.e•e ;ight tl"Pass is conboileei like tur!nais, ov4rp49saf, Arvi eNeys, CUt-e Op1106 e1lRta-6109 glory art oeove-Is IigH ap{.1. • Ote-tcr-Teed 50eculsr AIZAP.. aluminum artex tt r s"f`,r n prct-1696 shjitp C.l art it,, 7ype lit dl>finouvon. • Claw UV VacAze., ��yC.SuCr,.foi1G rstaineo r yttv0 c8rr't'.',o tvF,P9r- 99i81'On: 3tHin!6Ss elebi s,.rews • Pr+2Ciwx• die -car, alwr ntPi ncv.iz ng i:nsaririd In Dwaplex I1 r,rom re uOivQsier uC:wG+fr, . Ts:.lad Nile& ''11"" NPw i C `, 2J:'1 S:Cie 3-d wo lot ; ordUi', •: r.;''! ,qr; . oOr�tK>i, %ar,,'t'tpNr;t wrr .I•]�t:,rA p14gs. • Kncck0Ut8 Or, '_aCk of n0ub!s'+,1 are ccr npat!ble with rI,0Xthl9 LOX66 4?'.d o :d3 f: ! rruttd'ng mouritirV, :1u!so rat .d far 4Kt; ;, ;.a.: �i«tRa sr •��•. �r,nG cry ce�rrr��►o��� Tea Yrrj '!I .�:3'l� 3i"liS 408 !E: t 9 2-15 WPC Cut -Off Series Waiiprism PH9TC ETRIC.§ ^ m 2MK 1MN 11W r, 1,4 tw JV" L'V.'C70NL W,L LF.iv?P! ?W, HIPS Jeer REFL1CT0R.'8c*cvi #VzaW !sS>rLASS, Ty-pw II cut-ot b/1CLr%lr,r4 H(ST.: • 0' FOOTCANCU CGARECIION ,7,naer�r iti•nprJthWle4 rt,11[�ly tllfr It111urWfY� lactflre t+"193 tt,o tcnr�ar;c;�a v3l6irre for tr�r+�a; +n rit'Ju� tlry rMiQ K. s:kV,,}S 1n 50W HPS 25 i 00W HPS .69 1W Hn 1.0 1 WAAL .46 SUGGESTED SSpECIFICATIMS 0 VAN 1W aMN WP(j'160N�LXL WIN I)HPS clear REFLECTOR: 8Piw Wr Alzviie 1l5 GLASS; Type III taut-00 WOUMNIS $-GT: 1L'' MuklpN ttw't4QAl;rub 1e 40rd VM4IiAt 1aote6nu4 *wb b, crenpe4 In mourttrig rwoty. lb Cniame irprr 'C, --- Now Heigh Facta 1 915% " 0 FSA ac '()rt" 8h6l to J.1tG� # weatC er rets aI"dr[t power 'avo • HX•rIPF ctllasts (fU 1X Fixture shall be equipped w1tr+ celuxe, wallpriarn with sl, t p Type i ! cu1-uF. Ciat°ic. 1 SLAM NIPS ind 100W MA; mourned to Mateo poraown lamp Buaktt with rIzkel utior..-tuuSin; finuu be 6c rawri I resistant tad-os-st 91wirir. wr : ou;;.iy'or butter neat pldtry i aOrvw tshilil of is 5( rirl�.Ioe+iJa J clie-c Bt AlWrnli%im 1inlehat Ir, der'k euonzia dliWF3S ". -on4 SheN be C1831UV SlWi- ;;6AMyr "111a4t 5*i:11®SB in Miyn P1`68BUM Djaplex Pm polyester powder Mn ntearal uzed polycarbonbte and f•, n2ed to t•cusutp socium unit% snall be ovine rated 1Dr 4KV, r'iov40% o,(;^.Kcukt. ReNNott" snail b5 and rclsiner by tvev tornpor•res:stint Fixture s1r'9 even Type A: pmeisidrl G!e•tmrtl6o A'tak" 8!ur11'1'1Um 1c.' stainless aPtte! view$. A curtlnuous net• IjQn! J;Btr'::Ltbn Mh all 80• Cut•nh. glere•h'AR prene gasket is adncuchea k:e tween the Fixture w4i be STor cc Cat No. i&pewfy). FIXtUe 61)34 bH 'u-rtisnoo rMth Aeac;0' Ivs are heusirt4 to'orr d wi algalrst nf?F ballas's ti9 to "~.V HPS' p! r.l@h- wowirter. dust and det)n&. �p •7;i4t> �,i�.a•AI! Fd. • ,•n�cr . P.. C?L'd> • 4atdc:» .� !.- •4 31H1 t'•121YiL C',:t'ti CITY OF SOUTH BURLENGITON DEPARTMENT OF PLA1a NP'TG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH ELTRLIl?1GTOII1, VERMOD,i?' 0540? (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 6, 2005 Pat Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: Design Review Application #DR-05-04 Dear Mr. Malone: Enclo8ed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 7/5/05 (effective 7/5/05) If you have any questions, please contact me. �Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: John Floyd Cam ( n-4h �05 i � c-,!D l F' !l E�i i Permit Number M'- APPL.I.CATION for MASTER 5IGNAGE PERMIT City of South Burlington AEI, information requested in this application must be completed in full, if you. do not provide all of the requested information with this application form,'as well as the required plans and design information, the City will not schedule a review of the application before the Design Review Committee. A ppiic tion for: _ Initial Master Sigi.i ge hermit after June 3, 2002 _ Amendment of �iMaster Signage Permit ln&,idual Sign, pursuant to Master Signage Permit #DR--. - Property & Street Address: 358 Dorset St. /55 San Remo Dr. Tax parcel FDD # (fmn Tax Assessor or PI inning & Zoning): map- 5.j- Lot 16 ..__P �� V 3 S 8' /' 1a - 00 o 5-5 Property Owner of Record (name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone, fax#)- Patrick Malone, 122 Gallison Hill Rd., Montpelier, VT 05602 Phone: 802-223-9954 Fax: 802-229-90.09 Applicant, if not Owner (riame, mailing address, phone, fax #):__Same Contact parson (narrie, mailing address, phone, fax #): Y Same Is the a p hcant a-n existing or future tenant of the building? ..Yes X No Application is seeking approval to: Permit master signage wall & freestanding I hereby ,,2efW that all the information requested as part of s application has been subin ed an is acr_urate to the best of my knowledge.,! Please do not cll*e belvry This line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 1 have reviewed this application and find it to be C+YL ff- —�— - e� o esignee uilding Owner ✓omplete. uicomplete MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT 358 DORSET STREET AND 55 SAN REMO DRIVE Applicant and Property Owner: Patrick Malone Malone Properties 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05403 802-223-9954 Prepared by: John Floyd Design Signs, Inc. 644 Blair Park Road PO Box 1048 Williston, VT 05495 802-872-9906 The following Master Signage Permit is submitted in anticipation of replacing two freestanding signs and adding wall signs for one tenant, Van Phan Sports, as well as wall signs for two future tenants. 1.) Freestanding Signs a.) Computation of maximum allowable size: [Section 9(h) South Burlington Sign Ordinance] "Free-standing signs in the Dorset Street/City Center District may not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in overall dimensions and may be no higher than twelve (12) feet..." Proposed signs are thirty (30.2) square feet, comprised of three V x 8' tenant name panels (equaling 24 square feet) and one irregular shaped cap with street number equaling 6.2 square feet. The height of the signs will not exceed nine (9) feet. b.) Computation of maximum number of free-standing signs: [Section 9(b) (2) South Burlington Sign Ordinance] "Lots on which the Development Review Board has granted approval for the development of the property with two (2) or more separate entrances to a public road shall be entitled to additional free-standing signs where: (i) each entrance is separated from each other entrance by a distance in excess of three hundred (300) feet, as measured from center line to center line between the two entrances; and (ii) the number of proposed free-standing signs for the property does not exceed the number of public road entrances that meet the standards set forth above; and (iii) the proposed free-standing signs are located in the vicinity of the approved entrances and visible to vehicles passing the approved entrances." The two entrances to this property are separated from each other by 338 feet, the number of signs (two) equals the number of entrances, and both signs are in the vicinity of the approved entrances (approximately 30 feet for 358 Dorset Street and 20 feet for 55 San Remo Drive). c.) Non -complying signs: There will be no non -complying signs on the property; all existing signs will be removed. d.) Design Standards: The proposed freestanding signs are fabricated entirely of aluminum, for long-term structural integrity, and painted with satin brick -red enamel. The sign posts are aluminum, painted matte black, with aluminum ball post caps, painted gold. Each tenant will be required to have only white letters (with black outline or shadow optional) on the brick -red surface. The sign base will be landscaped with attractive plantings and wood mulch. The design of the sign faces is consistent with City Center goals, with graphics that are legible to both pedestrians and drivers, and are aesthetically pleasing. The brick -red background is harmonious with the brick building face, and is a natural color. 2.) Wall Signs a.) Computation of maximum allowable size: (Table 10-1 South Burlington Sign Ordinance) "Multi -tenant building or multi -building lot with a master signage permit in any district, including Dorset Street/City Center Sign District, with free-standing or landscape feature sign(s). Basis for total area of all wall signs: 10% of principal public facade for each building. Maximum area of an individual wall sign: 15% of facade to which it is attached or 100 square feet, whichever is smaller. Additional regulations...: Up to 2 signs per tenant. Signs may be attached to as many facades as have an actively used public entrance. Property owner must divide up signage area among tenants." Calculation of maximum allowable size: 55 San Remo Drive: Principle public facade (East wall) is 1,170 square feet, which will allow 117 square feet of total wall signs. Maximum area of an individual sign on the east wall is calculated at 152.1 square feet, so 100 square feet is the maximum allowed for one sign on this facade. The area of the west wall, which also has an actively used public entrance, is 600 square feet, allowing an individual sign of 90 square feet. Total sign area of both signs may not exceed 117 square feet. The two proposed signs are 39 square feet each, for a total of 78 square feet. Both of these figures are well below the maximums allowed. 358 Dorset Street: Principle public facade (west wall) is 1080 square feet, which will allow 108 square feet of total wall signs. This space is not yet leased; property owner will divide up signage area among tenants, applying the specifications from the Sign Ordinance shown above. b.) Design Standards: All wall signs shall be 2' - 4" high rectangular panels, with width as best fits tenant needs, and as approved by property owner and Zoning Administrator. Wall signs shall have a dark background with light colored graphics; graphics shall be dimensional, cut out of 1/2" to 1" thick material. It is recommended, but not required, that graphics extended above and/or below panel. Wall signs shall be installed within a band above the level of the top of the windows in each building. The design of the sign faces is consistent with this Master Sign Permit and City Center goals, with graphics that are legible to both pedestrians and drivers, and are aesthetically pleasing. The dark backgrounds are complimentary to the buildings, while the light color graphics will provide good legibility. The standardized location on all walls will provide a consistent appearance. 3.) Directory Signs, Incidental and Directional Signs. No such signs are on the property, and none are anticipated. Miscellaneous (window) signs will be utilized, complying with Section 18 (h), which permits window signs which do "not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total window to which the sign is attached." No window signs requiring a sign permit will be allowed. 4.) Design Parameters The specifications indicated above will create a strong consistency of shape, foreground and background color scheme, sizes, installation and sign type, all in accordance with the goals of the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District. 5.) Light Fixtures Each wall sign shall have lighting attached to the building wall above the sign. Incandescent bowl fixtures, each attached to the end of a'/4" arm extension, will direct light against the sign. Both the shape of the bowl and the location above the sign will restrict light spillage. Light fixtures will be installed on 3' centers (four lamps for a 12' sign). ATTACHMENTS: 1.) Plot plan, indicating the location of both freestanding signs. 2.) Photos of building facades indicating location of proposed signs (55 San Remo Drive only; building facades of 358 Dorset Street have not yet been renovated but the location above the window line will be similar). 3.) Color illustrations of proposed signs, including lighting. 4.) Cut sheets for light fixtures. 1 C� C� -- - - -12' - WALL SIGN 1/2" PVC plastic rectangular panel, with 1/2" PVC cut-out letters and billiard ball. Incandescent light fixtures mounted above sign. i-N, SIDE VIEW OZO c S Design Signs Inc. 644 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 1048 Williston, VT 05495 Zoo Design Signs Inc. 644 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 1048 Williston, VT 05495 50 11 1 Design Signs Inc. 644 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 1048 Williston, VT 05495 ti Design Signs Inc. 644 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 1048 Williston, VT 05495 Arm Ext )sions Add a scroll to your arm, consult factory. All arms corne with cast back plate. All fixtures are U.L. approved for wet location when used with arms, wail brackets, sterns and posts. High quality alumi- num construction. Al product is powder coated. 1/2 " Diameter Arm Extensions E1 EZ E 71 E15 { 711z" �13Y" f3° . `2 E4 �F" �/ \ so, 7 n" � 32' 3 /z' � � 14" . ��•� 6" f 14''' 'Puri buckle, cable and eye —� S" bolt included. 24#a' '� 22��a° 5TG included. 3IAf--Diameter Arm Extensions 0 -;IJ1 2Z,4" 2i2N,' 2711Y ?18„ 13" U 54i+a" E11 35„ T E12 E i T r� 46. /,/ 48Y4" 900 ELBOW 371,Y 35'I a 25 E18 a r, f�1 26" Eta ! 11" 1 ft'Js' _J i�� r --� 204 4,; GALL: 1 -8 0-548-3227 + FAX' 1-800-242-540' °SURFICAR©ER:'J1�'i10�'W.,�NPLlGHTPfl C- I.C(JM Angie 0.1. tJSted. AN prc5ucts Ve High 0L3!lt'Y A/Lir7inuin Cori strb Ct;00 l A807 Max Wan 1001 12" —7 '-N A610 rABX Watt 15G 14 '' A812 Max wa t 200 A814 Max Watt 200 `INCANDESCENT, MEDIUM BASE IS STANDARD ON ALL FIX; URES Ll;ylESS DRDERED OTHERWISE. STEPS TO EASY ORDERING' order online (9 www.anpligriing.com 1. Select shade size and color • See page 34 - for color options, see page 58 - for photometric data. 2. Choose how you are going to attach your shade to the wall, ceiling or post. 3. Select any accessories you would like - see page 35. 4, Determine Light Source - "ror Fluorescent and H.I.D., they will rewire a ballast that will be housed in a canopy or cutdcorweathertight box. Please see page 54 for your choices. If you choose Incandescent, leave the light source blank and you will be finished With the ordering process. Ang 1,12 Arm 3/4 Arm Et E5 E2 E6 E3 E7 E4 E8 tit) E9 C; E10 Ell E12 E13 E1B E18SC E19 E21 Post & Well PM10 PM20 PM30 PM40 PM50 WM35 WM45 WM55 WM55SC WM75 WMB.ti WM85SCBP WM85SC WM85BP Stems - 1/2- 2ST18 2ST24 2ST36 2ST48 (18" to 48" Lengths) Stems - 3/4" 3ST18 3ST24 3ST36 3ST48 f 18" to 48" Lengths? Ceiling Mount- Cords BLC WHC RWHC RBHC Ceiling Mount- Sterns SLC STC RLC RTC available in 1/2" or3'4' RWT (1-110. Weatherti ht Ballast Sox► Any?e Accessorics jiso pictured oa rave$ 35-Al Wire Gr'hs GR07 GR10 GR12 GR14 Sack Plate SQ CB Back Plate Cover CBC Swivel SWL 112"an. Glass order Number 1000L JJ Glass Texture lFrosted Clear POSmatiC White FR CL PR WH Order Number Example Shade Stile &,Sju Accc sory EStt�na Source l � r i A81-4R-{E5-41�� c'-41 Color CALL; 1-800-543-322 i a FAX: 1-800-242-5483 0 SURF/ORDER:WWW.ANPLIGHTIfiJG.00r,/I N CITY OF SOUTH BURLID-TGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIMG & ZGIQTIING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 30, 2005 Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT o5602 Re: 358 Dorset Street & 55 Sail Remo Drive Dear Mr. Malone: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board ineeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on 'Tuesday, July 5, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. if you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy Mc )onough Administrative Assistant Encl. 'Aotltf\ Tt-Aio- 11 , AGENDA City of South Burlington Design Review Committee Meeting City Hall Conference Room 575 Dorset Street Monday, June 27, 2005 Regular Meeting Time 7.30 PM 1. Call to order, introductions, attendance, additions to/deletions from the agenda. 2. Design Review Application #DR-05-04, Malone Properties, Applicant. Patrick Malone, Malone Properties, is seeking to replace two freestanding signs for two buildings on a multi -building lot located at 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive in the Dorset Street/ City Center Sign District. The applicant is also seeking to add wall signs for one tenant, Van Phan Sports. The master signage permit would also establish the design scheme for the wall signs for two future tenants. 3. Other Business. 4. Adjournment. Respectfully submitted, C' A—MY&I , 2 a 4 1 ) Ya 1,4 - � Cathy nn LaRose, Associate Planner MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee FROM: Cathy LaRose, Associate Planner DATE: .tune 20, 2005 COPY TO: Patrick Malone, Malone Properties Design Review Application Master Signage Permit DR-05-04 358 Dorset Street/ 55 San Remo Drive E Design Review Application DR-05-04 Page 2 of 5 Patrick Malone, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to replace two freestanding signs for two buildings on a multi -building lot located at 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive in the Dorset Street/ City Center Sign District. The applicant is also seeking to add wall signs for one tenant, Van Phan Sports. The master signage permit would also establish the design scheme for the wall signs for two future tenants. Pursuant to Section 6 of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance, the erection, alteration, or relocation of any sign within this district shall require design review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee (DRC) and Development Review Board (DRB). Section 8 of the Sign Ordinance requires all property owners within the DS/CC Sign District to obtain a Master Signage Permit. 1. A Master Signage Permit shall be issued to Malone Properties by the DRB, prior to the issuance of any individual sign permit for the property. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA In reviewing an application for signage, the DRC and DRB shall consider the following: (a) Consistent Design The design of a sign must be compatible and harmonious with the design of buildings on the subject property and nearby. The design of all signs on a property shall promote consistency in terms of color, graphic style, lighting, location, material and proportions. Staff feels the proposed signs are compatible with the existing building and the surrounding buildings. The freestanding signs will be constructed of aluminum and painted with enamel. They will have aluminum posts and ball post caps. Staff feels the proposed incandescent lighting to be mounted above each wall sign is acceptable, harmonious, and consistent. No lighting has been proposed for the freestanding signs. 2. Any future proposal for the lighting of the property's freestanding signs will require a sign permit from the code officer and must comply with Section 21 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. (b) Promotion of City Center Goals Signs within the DS/CC Sign District should be of high aesthetic quality and pedestrian oriented. The proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement. The freestanding signs will be landscaped with plantings and wood mulch. Graphics appear to be legible and aesthetically pleasing. (c) Color & Texture The applicant has proposed to use the color of brick -red, the freestanding signs for both buildings. The propos( complies with the standard in Section 6(b)(3) that sta predominant colors is encouraged to provide consiste schemes." In addition, staff feels the satin texture harmonious with buildings on the property and nearby. Design Review Application DR-05-04 Page 3 of 5 with black posts and, and white lettering for d color scheme for the freestanding signs :es, `The use of a maximum of three (3) it foreground, text, and background color )f the proposed signs is compatible and The applicant has only defined the color scheme of the wall signs as having a "dark background with light colored graphics." This is not in keeping with the Section 6(b)(3) design guidelines that encourage a maximum of three colors. The staff feels that the color scheme as proposed for the wall signs does not encourage sufficient consistency and that all wall signs should be of the same color scheme. This has worked well on other properties such as the Blue Mall. 3. The colors of the free standing signs shall be limited to brick- red, black, and white. All wall signs for both buildings shall be limited to blue, white, black and yellow, they shall have a dark background with light colored graphics. (d) Materials Used Pursuant to Section 20 of the Sign Ordinance, all signs shall be of substantial and sturdy construction, kept in good repair, and painted or cleaned as necessary to maintain a clean, safe, and orderly appearance. Staff feels the proposed signs are compatible with the existing building and the surrounding buildings. The freestanding signs will be constructed of aluminum and painted with enamel. 4. All signs shall be kept in good repair, landscaping surrounding the freestanding signs shall be kept trimmed and neat and shall not obscure the text of the signs. (e) Wall Mounted Signs Section 10 of the Sign Ordinance governs the size and location of wall -mounted signs. Specifications of Wall Signs for Multi -Building Lot Allowed Proposed 55 San Remo Dr. 358 Dorset St (Van Phan Sports) (not yet leased) Total area of all wall signs (10% of 117/108 sf 78 sf <108 sf principal public facade) res ectivel Max. area of an individual sign 100 sf 39 sf < 100 sf each (15% of fagade or 100 sf, whichever is smaller) Additional regulations Up to 2 signs 2 n/a per tenant Design Review Application DR-05-04 Page 4 of 5 Pursuant to Table 10-1 of the Sign Ordinance, a wall -mounted sign for a multi -tenant building or a multi -building lot with a master signage permit in any district with freestanding or landscape sign shall not exceed 15% of the area of the facade to which it is attached or 100 sq. ft., whichever is smaller. The proposed signage for the building at 55 San Remo Drive is in compliance with this requirement. The areas of the east and west walls are 152 and 600 square feet, respectively, allowing individual signs of 100 square feet and 90 square feet, respectively. The two proposed wall signs will have areas of 39 square feet each, which is well within this requirement. The public fagade for the building at 358 Dorset Street is 1080 square feet, which will allow a maximum individual sign size of 100 square feet. Exact dimensions of individual wall signs have not yet been proposed because the space is not yet leased; the specifications from the sign ordinance shall apply to those properties when they are leased. Pursuant to Table 10-1 of the Sign Ordinance, the total area of all wall -mounted signs on the subject property shall not exceed 10% of the area of principal public facade of each building. The proposed signage for the building at 55 San Remo Drive is in compliance with this requirement. The principal fagade of the building is 1170 square feet, limiting the maximum area of all wall signs to 117 square feet. The total signage proposed is 78 square feet, which is well within this requirement. The maximum area of signage allowed for the building at 358 Dorset Street shall be limited to 108 square feet. 5. The property owner shall divide up signage area, not to exceed a total of 108 square feet, among the future tenants of the building at 358 Dorset Street, applying the specifications from Section 10 of City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance. Section 10(c) states that a wall -mounted sign shall not project above the roof or parapet of the building nor below the top of any first floor doorway unless permitted through the design review approval process. The proposed sign locations will not project above the roof or parapet of the subject building. In addition, the proposed signs will not extend below the top of any first floor doorways or windows. Thus, the proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement. 6. All wall signs shall be installed within a band above the level of the top of the windows in each building so as to maintain a standardized location and provide a consistent appearance. Pursuant to Section 10(d), a wall -mounted sign shall not cover any opening or project beyond the top or end of any wall to which it is attached. The proposed signs are in compliance with this requirement. Design Review Application DR-05-04 Page 5 of 5 Section 10(g) stipulates that a wall -mounted sign shall not project from the wall in excess of 9". The proposed signs are in compliance with this requirement. The graphics shall be dimensional and cut out of/2" to 1" thick material. () Freestanding Signs Section 9(h) states that free-standing signs along Dorset Street are to be located in a sign corridor that begins adjacent to the road Right -of -Way and runs sixteen (16) feet from the edge of the Right of Way toward the building face. In those instances where dimensions do not provide for a two (2) foot setback from the Right -of -Way before a sign support post can be located, it is permitted to erect a centered single pole mounted sign of which the road side edge of the sign is directly outside the R.O.W. line. The proposed signs are in compliance with this requirement. Section 9(h) states that free-standing signs in the Dorset Street/City Center District may not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in overall dimensions and may be no higher than twelve (12) feet, measured from the average finished grade at the base of the sign to the highest point of any part of the sign structure. The proposed signs are in compliance with this requirement. The proposed signs are 30.2 square feet and stand at a height of less than 9 feet. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Center Design Review Committee approve Master Signage Permit #DR-05-04 conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items above. Respectfully Submitted, Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner BILL SZYMANSKI, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 846-4io6 (phone) 846-4101(fax) COMMENTS Patrick Malong� Sri eTmprovement Dorset Street — San Remo Drive 8/19/04 1. Lot must have dimensions. 2. Dorset Street lot line shall be shown. 3. Existing and proposed water and sewer lines shall be shown. 4. The sidewalk along San Remo Drive should be included. An easement will be required. The sidewalk shall be continuous across the driveways. 5. Re -grading and repaving of parking lot shall be shown on the plans. irE = 7�ndmn Aec�At� ql� u- - 3, 5� / I, 62 5f hwd_ge& Pk� . yo W "j�,, sy�a Pq' A4, stone CATALOG NO - --- ----- - - - ---- - TYPE NO. ___ JOB NAME ___.____ 2-15 WPC Cut -Off Series Wallprism ORDERING INFORMATION Catalog Number: Example! WPC150LxLPG6-6 FIXTURE I LAMP LL WPC. OFTION� SOURCE FS•Single PRODUCT fusing VOLTAGE out -off WATTAGELx•Hlgl, � 120v PE IFICATI IS Jaliy rism Pressure ."' �a--- 35.35W' Sodium L•Fixtures 277U 1.120U 50 50Nr' (odium tarnished FFS•Oouble 2.208V StOnco's Cut -of, V`d2'p"sri i5 cJlt'h lamp fusing 3.240V goal for sgCu'ity' ligl':�Xr aicunc 70•?Olh' rJLX•Ni9tl Pressure 208V ouildinJ penrletarE. ,06d' fCr 100 100W 240V 4 277V 150'1501h' Sodium 460V 6.120V Roadway I!gr.ti g wre,c ;ioht (NPf) 208V trespass is cDrt;oiled Rkb turirels, (AA -Metal Photoco trolfoe 240V Halide Photocontral for pv�;rpassts, arc alleys. Hlide 120V, 208V, 277V .Cut ot` optics elifr',r:aeE yi,:ro t 240V, 277V (mustsoeclfy ano provpnts light :pi] vpltagtl • D EJ."crmed specular Hi28k aluminum its fler�tCr .7y�",drr1 '35W, SOW, 16OW Availaulu;n H1Vh Pressure Sodium only. ' 70W, 10M, 150W Available QMY, provides shaip Cut-off 7Ypa lit t•' 35W, 50W, 70W (NPF),1004V (NPF),16OW (NPF) Available 120V only, Metal Halide units distribution, avalloble in '120V or 277V • Glear UV stabilized ri0lycar0 hate lead h!nged to housurll� ar.d retei ned rry two capt%6 t2 nG3r• EiCCESSDI3ffES esisld , stFIin!(.5s Steel 3,.!ews, P15OM-Light leveler photc=r l'rol 2r, V-277V PI OA-Pencil phot000ntrol for 120V.. • hOUSI nor die-cast alurra u» huu�•�nc� S�niSr,r•,�d inDurp!ex l P150A-Pholw-,�*6 for 120V WPC 552- Rep' acement lens, bror*12b polyester !powder, • Ta; pad side a-d jop for:•ir;5Uit Cr r:.i,_,t7. cor'i'rul, ,c,�iplete �ai•. cl:•,rr.r�a IECINNI_G INFQRMA710-H • KnockoutB Ori Fuck at h0usir''D 'XPC fixtures reaulre a rnedh,,m base lamp, High Pressure Sodiurtl units use Ell are compaiible .Nitre r o.rtir,g clear lamp, Mrstal Halide units use ED17 lamp. Not for use In corwashds or cther boxes anJ prov cie f- r cira:.t tc. areas ,hat may enirap teat, bmouniing, lazed �rat,gl ioi 4 V ;iti'. r.;>C- �� _ T �. � t l � � �Ibt d •scr,yw shdli, u1 Ul. Wet Locatan Li 1W- L UL Fil! �r�esce�tt st[rncv ,—.I',-- -Z—. . . T1;, 7zt:H.a )T;H1. }313 31ViS; t1If'ri.L 2-15 Pti010MFTRICS -7niH 2v:N t;dn i iNt1 M'n gnu, 6 '.ri H <::IH 3Mn I.AV.P: 70'y'J HPS -dear' REFLECTOR; 8�vacwwr Alaak' IES CLASS; Typb III Cut•ofl ivicwriNG HGaT,: '0' FCOT0ANDLE CORRECTION D;r76r&rt, LumpavWN ttts M1:lltipl'y thu I011owiny fawtors vnes the footcanGia v�livva for chwn ee� In rnouaing nwight. 3'�'Y •;?s .14 ';i "; rips .25 HPS ,L1d, i C AbV HPS 59 1501V HPS 1,0 7 OMAL .34 1 C 0NIAL .45 SU G STED SPECIFIC WPC Cut-off Series ■■allpris ,i 3Mi: 2M1. ',t,H t nt i+ U 2MI rlr U t,1H :Mrl jMt' WPC 15ONLYL LAMP; 15OW HPS clam REFLECTOR: Specular Alzak" IES CLASS; Type III cut-off MOUNTING HGT,. 10' ' ""'!GA!,' Mnuntrng !-targ"It Multiply the following twors timer: G1e tootc4ndle values for changes in moun'tl% rieigjht. )b CNarnaS from I. - New Heipht _81 _ iQ' — 12' 15 - Facto 1 5b 1.0 .fis7 `44 Fixture Shull be outdoor 'Neithtr-rasstalnr power factor HX-t-IPF ballasts ((0, 100, Fixture shall be equipped wml ceFux.e. w�tllprisrrt wilh viarp Type H cul..of' cistric- 150V%' HPS and 100W MA) mounted 'tc glazed parcelain lama socket with nickel 'J(ICn. n'IUUSrnS Sr18il iJe CGrrotS:jn rtl6ibutnt die•ca�t ulurn:lnurl ;,jou$IIYJ for Ukitttdr hrejit plclt6C S,�rwvv Ghca ano ;prirl(j• C:iJ(- die•C3wt alu!-ninunl finiShuC in iJark OronaC JiSsipa;iun. moans shali be clear UV sta�li--[.1ter cpntaGt. SOCIc�tS it ^,iy, ;� ensure Uuraplex''• )',I polyester powder witii integral lized polycai con6,ta and hinged to 1`10usir10 sodium urnitt_. shall be pure rated for 4KV. mounting knc;0kout3, Reflects shall he and retairleU by two tarnpar•resistant Fixturo srra:l prc',Aoe a broad, evc;rl Type it precision aie-formed Aizak,' aluminuM for std11)1466 Steel Sprew'S. A continuous neo• light distribution with an 80` cut oh. glaro-free lia':lting. pru;nu gasket is sandwichad between lha Fixture Ghall oe Slorco Cat, fwu. ispyrity)• Fixture shall to furnishaa with .Reactor lens and housing to form a s.aai artalrst ifJp(: b.dl;ts'S ia5 l0 550b"'J HpS' o! `'igh weather, dus' and debris. Cre....metSrvao 1 ��a..�_a�sJl F.d. • U'1iur, P:: GlCcS 'dCo -_� ?COO 'te•�' 7. .,fi3�rHd 31Vi ldifl11 GRAVEL AND SHEA �— Attorneys at Law Stewart H. McConaughy Clarke A. Gravel (1916-2002) Robert B. Hemley William G. Post, Jr. Charles T Shea Craig Weatherly Stephen R. Crampton 76 St. Paul Street John R. Ponaetto Of Courted Post Office Box 369 Peter S. Erly Robert F. O'Neill Norman Williams Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Margaret L. Montgomery Special Courted Stephen P. Magowan Michelle N. Farkas Telephone 802.658.0220 Heather Briggs Robert H. Rushford Cornelius C. Cowles Heather Rider Hammond Faeointile 802.658.1456 Mark A. Crow Megan J. Shafritz www. gravelshea.com Andrew D. Manitsky William A. Mason. IV Writer'sE-Mail: February 16, 2005 Johan W.E. Maitland Andrew R.Strauss rrushford rt gravelshea.com Timothy M. Eustace, Esq. Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C. 171 Battery Street P. O. Box 1507 Burlington, VT 05402-1507 Re: Patrick Malone —Approval for 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Dear Tim: We represent Patrick Malone, the owner of the above referenced properties. The South Burlington DRB recently granted final plat approval for some renovation work to the buildings on Mr. Malone's properties. A copy of the approval is enclosed for your convenience. Pursuant to Conditions 10 and 14 of the approval, I enclose the following documents for your review: 1. Sidewalk Easement Deed. 2. Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return for the Sidewalk Easement Deed. 3. Partial Discharge of Mortgage for the Sidewalk Easement Deed. 4. Notice of Condition of Approval. Also enclosed is a copy of the survey. It is my understanding that a revision will be submitted to the City under separate cover to address the additional requirements of the approval (i.e., before the March 14, 2005 recording deadline). For your convenience, I am also forwarding a set of these documents to Ray Belair. GRAVEL AND SHEA Timothy M. Eustace, Esq. Please be in touch with any comments or questions. RHR:ncm Enclosures cc: Mr. Patrick Malone (w/o enclosures) Mr. Ray Belair (w/enclosures) \,� It Y Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford February 16, 2005 Page 2 SIDEWALK EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that PATRICK MALONE, of Montpelier, County of Washington and State of Vermont ("Grantor") in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to him paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipality located in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont ("Grantee), hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for the purpose of using and maintaining a pedestrian sidewalk for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Premises"), described as follows, viz: Being an easement seven feet (7') in width and one hundred thirty-nine feet (139') in length along the front boundary line of Grantor's land, having an address of 55 San Remo Drive, for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, repairing and replacing a pedestrian sidewalk for public use, which easement area is depicted on a plat entitled: "Survey of Land Owned by Patrick Malone, #358 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Gregory F. DuBois, L.S., dated September, 2004, last revised , 2005 and recorded in Map Volume _ at Page _ (Map Slide _) of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). The easement and right-of-way described above shall be used as a pedestrian sidewalk, subject to the condition that no motorized traffic, including but not limited to motorcycles, trail bikes and snowmobiles, shall be allowed to use the sidewalk, except motorized vehicles used by the Grantee, or its agents, for the purpose of maintaining or patrolling the sidewalk. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain, and pave said sidewalk, including the right to install, maintain, repair, and replace all culverts, cuts, curbs, and ramps, at its sole cost, expense, and risk. By its recording of this Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantor lying outside the scope of this easement and right-of-way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hereunder, shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold Grantor harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of-way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this easement deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. Grantor and his heirs and assigns shall have the right to make use of the surface of so much of his property as is encumbered hereby, such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said easement and right-of-way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement area which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to use said easement and right-of-way. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the Grantor by Trustee's Deed of William E. Drislane, Successor Trustee of the Stephen M. Whittlesey Trust, dated May 11, 2004 and recorded in Volume 666 at Page 681 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Premises are subject to the following: (1) terms and conditions of the South Burlington Development Review Board Findings ofFact and Decision #SD-04-80 dated December 14, 2004; and (2) all easements, restrictions and rights of way of record and as depicted on the Plat, not meaning to reinstate any claims barred by operation of the Vermont Marketable Record Title Act, 27 V.S.A. §601-611, both inclusive. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deeds and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said granted Premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, PATRICK MALONE does for himself and his heirs and assigns, covenant with the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, he is the sole owner of the Premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are free from every encumbrance; except as aforesaid, and he hereby engages to Warrant and Defend the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PATRICK MALONE, has set his hand and seal this day of .2005. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness Patrick Malone STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF 'SS. On this day of , 2005, personally appeared PATRICK MALONE, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public Notary commission issued in _ My commission expires: 2/10/07 <236562.1/52j6011.WPD/> - 2 - County VERMONT. AOPERTY TRANSFER TAB IETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. Patrick Malone 51 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER ]DENT. NO. City of South Burlington South Burlington City Hall, 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address in full) DATE OF CLOSING Sidewalk Easement 55 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, VT INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. ❑ FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST 5. ❑ TIME-SHARE 7. ® EASEMENT/ROW 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED % INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER LAND SIZE (Acres or fraction SPECIAL FACTORS: HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS BEEN CONVEYED X NO YES thereof) 7 WAS SALE BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS X NO YES STATE RELATIONSHIP n/a - Easement FINANCING: ❑ CONVENTIONAL/BANK ❑ OWNER FINANCING ❑ OTHER BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1, ® NONE 5. ❑ FARM BUILDINGS 9. ❑ STORE 2. ❑ FACTORY 6. ❑ MULTI -FAMILY WITH ( INSERT DWELLING UNITS 10. ❑ OTHER NUMBER TRANSFERRED 3. ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑ MOBILE HOME YEAR MAKE SER. NO. 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( INSERT UNITS TRANSFERRED NUMBER CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE 2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. ❑ OTHER DESCRIBE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. ® OTHER Sidewalk Easement WAS PROPERTY PURCHASED BY TENANT X NO YES DOES BUYER HOLD TITLE TO ANY ADJOINING PROPERTY X NO YES CURRENT USE VALUE PROGRAM: IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER THE AGRICUL- TURAL AND MANAGED FOREST LAND USE VALUE PROGRAM CHAPTER OF 124 OF 32 V.S.A. ❑ YES ® NO IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N, AND 0 BELOW. TOTAL PRICE PAID FOR • PRICE PAID FOR PRICE PAID $ 0.00 PERSONAL PROPERTY $ REAL PROPERTY $ 0.00 STATE TYPE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE, PLEASE DESCRIBE: • 1 1 MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES T$ 0.00 TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED 5/11/04 IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET 2 (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) TOWN/CITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER _ LISTED VALUE $ PARCEL ID NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK PAGE NO. GRAND LIST YEAR OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I TOWN NUMBER RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED CLERK DATE Form PT-1 (8/02) RATE SCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructions) ..................................... b. Value of property enrolled in current use program............................................................... . c. Value of qualified working farm.............................................................................. . d. Add Lines 1 a, b and c..................................................................................... . e.Tax rate ................................................................................................. f. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line 1 d by Line 1 e..................................................... . 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line O on front of return.................................................................... . b. Enter amount from Line I of Rate Schedule above............................................................. . c. Subtract Line 2b from Line 2a............................................................................... . d.Tax rate ................................................................................................. e. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2c by Line 2d...................................................... 3. Total Tax Due: 1. a. $ 0.00 b. $ c. $ d. $ 0.00 e. 0.005 f. $ 0.00 2. a. $ 0.00 b. $ 0.00 c. $ 0.00 d. $ 0.0125 e. $ 0.00 Add Lines 1f and 2e and enter here and on Line P on front of return .................................................. 3. $ 0.00 FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATION AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyer(s) and Seller(s) certify as follows: A. That they have investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, if any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(s) advised the buyer(s) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations and wastewater system and potable water supply rules under Chapter 64 of Title 10 pertaining to the property may limit significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer is in compliance with or is exempt from the wastewater system and potable water supply rules of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property is the subject of Permit No. WW-4-0717 and is in compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel is exempt from the wastewater system and potable water supply rules because (see instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number b. Parcel retained: Exemption Number Seller(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of real property and any development thereon is in compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act 250), for the following reason: 1. This property is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and is in compliance with said permit, or 2. This property is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from Line D in instructions) b E. That this transfer does/does not (strike one) result in a partition or subdivision of land. Note: if it does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form RW-171 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reasons (check one): ® 1. Under penalties of perjury, seller(s) certifies that at the time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyer(s) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner of Taxes in advance of this sale. ® 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form RW-171.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee in a foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Patrick Malone By: Duly Authorized Agent Preparer's Signature Prepared by Gravel and Shea Preparer's Address P. O. Box 369, Burlington, VT 05402-0369 Buyer's Representative Tel. (Print or Type) keep a copy of this return for your records. <236565.1/52j901 I. WPD/1 PARTIAL DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK, with a place of business in Derby, Vermont ("Mortgagee"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, for itself, its successors and assigns, does hereby release and discharge the following described property from the Mortgage Deed of PATRICK MALONE to COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK dated August 6, 2004 and recorded in Volume 678 at Page 309 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, to wit: Being an easement seven feet (T) in width and one hundred thirty-nine feet (139') in length along the front boundary line of Grantor's land, having an address of 55 San Remo Drive, for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, repairing and replacing a pedestrian sidewalk for public use, which easement area is depicted on a plat entitled: "Survey of Land Owned by Patrick Malone, #358 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Gregory F. DuBois, L.S., dated September, 2004, last revised , 2005 and recorded in Map Volume _ at Page _ (Map Slide ___) of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Patrick Malone by Trustee's Deed of William E. Drislane, Successor Trustee of the Stephen M. Whittlesey Trust, dated May 11, 2004 and recorded in Volume 666 at Page 681 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. Mortgagee intends to release, remise and quitclaim only the above -described property from the operation of the aforementioned Mortgage Deed. In all other respects, said Mortgage Deed shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK, as evidenced by the signature of its Duly Authorized Agent, does hereby execute this document this day of , 2005. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF 'SS. COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK 0 Duly Authorized Agent At , in said County and State, this day of , 2005, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK, to me known, and he/she acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK. Before me, Notary Public Notary commission issued in County My commission expires: 2/10/07 <x36366.1/52j@0IIMPnn NOTICE OF CONDITION OF APPROVAL WHEREAS, the South Burlington Development Review Board (the "Board") granted final plat approval #SD-4-80 dated December 14, 2004 to Patrick Malone ("Malone") for various improvements at Malone's property located at 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive, under the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of South Burlington as shown on a plat entitled: "Survey of Land Owned by Patrick Malone, #358 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Gregory F. DuBois, L.S., dated September, 2004, last revised , 2005 and recorded in Map Volume at Page _ (Map Slide __) of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"); and WHEREAS, Condition # 15 ofthe Board's approval requires Malone to record allotice of Condition in the City of South Burlington Land Records indicating that Malone will provide the owner of the property to the north (shown on the Plat as "N/F/ Champlain Oil Company, Inc."), an access easement to Malone's property if deemed necessary by the Board in connection with a plan approved by the Board for the development of the property to the north. NOW THEREFORE, to provide actual notice in the South Burlington City Land Records, the undersigned in receipt of consideration of the approval of the Board and other valuable consideration, hereby acknowledges and accepts the following condition and covenant as binding upon and running with the land: 1. Malone hereby covenants and agrees to provide the adjacent property owner to the north of the Malone property as shown on the Plat with an access easement if such access easement is deemed necessary by the Board in connection with its review of a plan for the development of the property to the north; subject, however, to standard requirements that the parties mutually agree to the location of the easement, that the easement will not unreasonably interfere with Malone's use of his land or the existing structures and uses thereon, and that the grantee of the easement will maintain the easement area on a pro rata basis and will indemnify, defend and save Malone harmless from any claims arising from the use of such easement. 2. This Notice of Condition of Approval shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referenced in any Deed conveying a lot or interest in Malone's property. This Notice of Condition of Approval shall be binding upon the Malone and his heirs and assigns. Dated at , Vermont, this _ day of , 2005. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness Patrick Malone STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF 'SS. On this day of , 2005, personally appeared PATRICK MALONE, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public Notary commission issued in _ My commission expires: 2/10/07 123e563.I/52j701 I.WPDD - 2 _ County Jun 29 04 04:20p Marcel Beaudin 8028620283 p.6 Permit �ltrmber IR- 01'7 - �q CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON AT'D ICA TIOI�r FOR DIE'SiG VIE W All information_ requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Comanittee and Develenmant Revie �� Board. l) approval is being sought for (check all that apply): tz Design Plan Approval 0 Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fa.-, i#)T __ Patrick Malone, 122 Gallison Hill Rd ,Montpelier, VT_ 05602 (iffice: 802-223-9954; Fax: 802-229-9009; Cell: 802-793-0179 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 9) Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) _ Same as above _ 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 358 Dorset St. & 55 San Remo Dr 6) 'TAX PARCEL 1D # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) Map 25 Lot 16 7) PROTECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. Removal of 3600 sg.ft., addition of parking fiQld, reconstruc.iF parkin and drainage. Reconstruction of exterior - see attached plans Jun 29 04 04:21p Marcel Beaudin 802BG20283 p.7 The M!'Ormation listtwd on l;�di bit A a.faceu shG.11 be sub»i'�.ted along with thus a.pp!ication sor:��i. "jv, (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (i V x 1'7") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. 1 hereby certify that all the information req ested part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. TURE OF Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBNi SSION. 1 have reviewed this design review application and find it to be; C Complete 0 Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date Jul 15 04 05:02p Marcel Beaudin 8028620283 F.1 BEAUDIN AND ASSOCIATES INC ARCHITECTS PLANNERS INTERIOR DESIGNERS APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW 358 DORSET STREET & 55 SAN REMO DRIVE EXHIBET A ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS: DORSET STREET BUILDING: ALL THE METAL SIDING WILL BE REPLACED WITH A FOREST GREEN (DARK) LARGE PROFILE HORIZONTAL METAL SIDING. THE EXISTING BRICK WILL REMAIN. NEW BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING WILL BE ADDED AT THE NEW ENTRANCES PROPOSED. SAN REMO DRIVE BUILDING: ALL THE EXISTING METAL SIDING WILL BE RESTORED OR REPLACED AND PAINTED A FOREST GREEN. BRICK MATCHING DORSET BUILDING WILL BE USED IN THE ENTRY. THE EXISTING ROOFING IS A DARK MEMBRANE THAT CAN NOT BE EASILY SEEN. THERE IS NO EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOFS. THERE WILL BE TWO A/C COMPRESSORS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDINGS. THERE IS A GMP ELECTRIC TRANSCLOSURE IN THE DORSET STREET ROW. ALL THE ROOF FASCIA AND SOFFITS WILL BE REPLACE WITH NEW FOREST GREEN METAL WITH CLEAN LINES EXCEPT THE WERE THERE ARE EXISTING COPPER FASCIAS ON THE DORSET BUILDING, ALL/THE WINDOWS AND DOORS WILL BE REPLACED WITH FOREST GREEN METAL GLAD FRAMES. THE BUILDING HEIGHT WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED (APPROXIMITELY 18 FEET). THE EXISTING PAVING WILL BE REPLACED AND MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MADE TO THE GRADE TO PROVIDE FOR BETTER DRAINAGE. HOWEVER WE PROPOSED TO REPAVE THE SMALL PARKING SPACE OFF SAN REMO DRIVE. THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE ALL DOWN -CASTING. THERE ARE PROPOSED ENTRANCE SHELTERS, TWO FOR THE DORSET STREET BUILDING AND ONE FOR THE SAN REMO DRIVE BUILDING ON THE SOUTH SIDES. 1233 SHELBURNE ROAD, EIS SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 802 862 9633 FAX 802 862 0283 E3 0 0 No Text A No Text I I m I ,,.. L�-ffiim No Text 16In No Text No Text No Text r- � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM. Brian Robertson, Associate Planner DATE: January 20, 2005 Cc: Patrick Malone DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Design Review Application DR-04-09 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Patrick Malone, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) replace existing metal siding with large profile, horizontal metal siding, 2) add brick to proposed entrances, 3) replace all doors and windows with metal frames, 4) install additional exterior lighting, and 5) add three (3) entrance shelters. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(b) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of an exterior wall of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). The applicant was scheduled to appear before the DRC at its November meeting. However, the siding material to be used on the subject building was not finalized, so the applicant requested a continuance. Design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. The proposed modifications are in compliance with this criterion. (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard Design Review Application DR-04-09 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Page 2 of 5 (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. Examples of unacceptable materials include metal skin and laminated wood (e.g., T-111). Along Dorset Street, the existing brick facade will be retained with similar brick added to the exterior wall at the new entrance on the south elevation. The existing metal siding will be replaced with vinyl beveled siding trimmed with a PVC or cement -based wood substitute. The fascias will be replaced with pre -finished sheet metal. The existing doors will be replaced with metal clad doors. The color will be dark green for all trim, fascias, windows, and doors. The siding will be a dark red to blend with the existing brick. Along San Remo Drive, the same materials are proposed, however, the color will be white for all trim, fascias, windows, and doors. The siding will be an ochre or tan. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. 1. The color along Dorset Street shall be dark green for all trim, fascias, windows, and doors, and dark red for the siding. The color along San Remo Drive shall be white for all trim, fascias, windows, and doors, and ochre or tan for the siding. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity, however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. The applicant is proposing to replace all existing doors and windows with dark green or white metal clad frames. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. The roofs of the buildings are not being changed through the proposed project Design Review Application DR-04-09 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Page 3 of 5 (f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. The orientation of the subject building is not being altered through the proposed project. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. In Design District 1, the provision of a covered pedestrian promenade along Market Street is required in order to protect pedestrians from inclement weather and promote walking. Any pedestrian canopy, or portion thereof, that is proposed to be located within or encroach into the public R. O. W. shall meet the specifications identified in the City Center Streetscape Guidelines. An applicant may elect to incorporate a covered pedestrian promenade as a component of the building and completely on the applicant's property, provided the promenade is at least 10 feet high and 8 feet deep. The Development Review Board may waive the requirement for a covered pedestrian promenade or canopy on a building or portion thereof if the Development Review Board finds that the block on which the building is located is adequately covered by other existing promenades/canopies. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following site design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.02 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Landscape and plantings. Significant trees and vegetation should be preserved in its natural state insofar as practicable. Any grade changes should be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas. Landscape plantings and amenities shall be well designed with appropriate variations and shall be included as an integral enhancement of the site and, where needed, for screening purposes. In particular, parking areas shall be well screened by berms, plantings, or other screening methods to minimize their visual impact. Planting islands shall be used to break up larger expanses of paved parking areas. Design Review Application DR-04-09 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Page 4 of 5 The landscaping plan was reviewed and approved by the Development Review Board. (b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street, existing or planned. Such features shall be incorporated within or designed as part of the building on the site, not added as an afterthought. HVAC equipment should not be pad mounted at grade. Utility connections shall be installed underground and utilities shall co- exist to the greatest extent possible. The applicant is proposing two (2) A/C compressors on the north side of the buildings. Staff feels that the location of the A/C compressors is adequate, but that the applicant should submit details on the screening. 2. The applicant should submit details on the screening of the A/C compressors. (c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a building and its surroundings. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (d) Accessible open space_ When providing open space on a site, it shall be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. Open space should add to the visual amenities of the vicinity by maximizing its visibility for persons passing by or overlooking the site from neighboring properties. If open space is intended for active use, it should include such elements as benches, shade trees, and refuse containers and be so designed to maximize its accessibility for all individuals, including the disabled, and encourage social interaction. The siting of open space on a lot shall also consider the potential impact of buildings, both existing and potential, on shadow casting and solar access. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. With respect to vehicular and pedestrian circulation, special attention shall be given to the location and number of access points to public streets and sidewalks, to the separation of vehicles and pedestrians, to the arrangement of parking areas and to service and loading areas, and to the location of accessible routes and ramps for the disabled. Site design shall also provide for interconnections, both vehicular and pedestrian, between adjacent properties. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (t) Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to be both aesthetically pleasing and functional. The lighting type shall be metal halide, compact fluorescent, and/or induction lamps, and shall be of a white color (e.g., CRI 70 or greater). Light fixtures shall be Design Review Application DR-04-09 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Page 5 of 5 appropriately shielded to preclude glare and overall illumination levels should be evenly distributed. The applicant is proposing to change all of the exterior lighting on the buildings. The lighting details were incorporated into the Development Review Board's decision for the subject property. (g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks, and to provisions for snow and ice removal from circulation areas. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. Such streetscape improvements shall be in accord with the specifications contained in the City Center Streetscape Design Guidelines. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application E>91x'nnc {6DEWAI,K NEW COLONNADE EXISTING SIDEWALK NQRTH� ELEVATION B_0 � ■ EAST ELEVAT ION 1/811 C 11.011 WESTELEVATtON 1/8 =1'-001 �0 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/811 = 11-011 U) z 0 d W a w E"' O W� A O .ero s•:i. 99 J•t• 99 Al I I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 15, 2004 Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-79 & Final Plat Application #SD-04-80 Dear Mr. Malone: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on December 14, 2004 (effective 12/14/04). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 90 days (must be submitted by 3/14/05) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, 1'ioN n5��� Betsy Mc onough, Administrate e Assistant Encl. l Y,l'wi , A,`r$ i'il.D'Rd ✓:'.i.,9 CJ ) )t IDEWALK EASEMENT DEED b"aAbe y JAL"F_'aSiSSR���D HI VALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that PATRICK MALONE, of Montpelier, County of Washington and State of Vermont ("Grantor") in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to him paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipality located in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont ("Grantee), hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for the purpose of using and maintaining a pedestrian sidewalk for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Premises"), described as follows, viz: Being an easement seven feet (7') in width and one hundred thirty-nine feet (139') in length along the front boundary line of Grantor's land, having an address of 55 San Remo Drive, for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, repairing and replacing a pedestrian sidewalk for public use, which easement area is depicted on a plat entitled: "Survey of Land Owned by Patrick Malone, #358 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Gregory F. DuBois, L.S., dated September, 2004, last revised December 6, 2004 and recorded in Map Slide 451 at Page 3 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). The easement and right-of-way described above shall be used as a pedestrian sidewalk, subject to the condition that no motorized traffic, including but not limited to motorcycles, trail bikes and snowmobiles, shall be allowed to use the sidewalk, except motorized vehicles used by the Grantee, or its agents, for the purpose of maintaining or patrolling the sidewalk. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain, and pave said sidewalk, including the right to install, maintain, repair, and replace all culverts; cuts, curbs, and ramps, at its sole cost, expense, and risk. Also included herein is a temporary easement during periods of construction to enter Grantor's lands to the extent necessary to construct, repair and replace the above -described sidewalk. By its recording of this Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantor lying outside the scope of this easement and right-of-way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hereunder, shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold Grantor harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of-way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this easement deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. § 2309 and 12 V.S.A. § 5793. Grantor and his heirs and assigns shall have the right to make use of the surface of so much of his property as is encumbered hereby, such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said easement and right-of-way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement area which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to use said easement and right-of-way. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the Grantor by Trustee's Deed of William E. Drislane, Successor Trustee of the Stephen M. Whittlesey Trust, dated May 11, 2004 and recorded in Volume 666 at Page 681 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Premises are subject to the following: (1) terms and conditions of the South Burlington Development Review Board Findings ofFact and Decision #SD-04-80 dated December 14, 2004; and (2) all easements, restrictions and rights of way of record and as depicted on the Plat, not meaning to reinstate any claims barred by operation of the Vermont Marketable Record Title Act, 27 V.S.A. §601-611, both inclusive. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deeds and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said granted Premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, PATRICK MALONE does for himself and his heirs and assigns, covenant with the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, he is the sole owner of the Premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are free from every encumbrance; except as aforesaid, and he hereby engages to Warrant and Defend the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PATRICK MALONE, has set his hand and seal this 7tay of 2005. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness L.l;�-dlrick Malone STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF SS. On this day of �� i'�,' 4% , 2005, personally appeared PATRICK MALONE, to me known to be the person who ex cuted the foregoing instrument, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed. Vermont Property Transfer Tax 32 V.S.A. Ch3P 231 RETURN REC Ta C F �' ) G HEALTH CERT. REC'D. VT LAND US'w U Dt'J�L{J it Ev f Ll�No 11 ACT CERT. REC'D r Fteeturn No. Clerk 1236562.2/52j6011. WPDh Before me, JNotary Public Notary commission issued in My commission expires: 2/10/07 -2- i _ av Dip k' "R[�f12TIAL DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE Di KN VV atft m BY THESE PRESENTS, that COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK, with a place of business in erby, Vermont ("Mortgagee"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, for itself, its successors and assigns, does hereby release and discharge the following described property from the Mortgage Deed of PATRICK MALONE to COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK dated August 6, 2004 and recorded in Volume 678 at Page 309 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, to wit: Being an easement seven feet (7') in width and one hundred thirty-nine feet (139') in length along the front boundary line of Grantor's land, having an address of 55 San Remo Drive, for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, repairing and replacing a pedestrian sidewalk for public use, which easement area is depicted on a plat entitled: "Survey of Land Owned by Patrick Malone, #358 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Gregory F. DuBois, L.S., dated September, 2004, last revised December 6, 2004 and recorded in Map Slide 451 at Page 3 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Patrick Malone by Trustee's Deed of William E. Drislane, Successor Trustee of the Stephen M. Whittlesey Trust, dated May 11, 2004 and recorded in Volume 666 at Page 681 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. Mortgagee intends to release, remise and quitclaim only the above -described property from the operation of the aforementioned Mortgage Deed. In all other respects, said Mortgage Deed shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COMMUNITY NATION�L BANK, as evidenced by the signature of its Duly Authorized Agent, does hereby execute this document this ,�s day of )2005. IN PRESENCE OF: ..--J117 .- et ", -mac / f% � -- ss COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK By: ~ Duly A&thorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT; COUNTY JSS. At fit% , in said County and State, thi� day of `%' c: , 2005, personally appeare ' ., Duly Authorized Agent of COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK, tome known, and he/she acknowledged this iristrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK. 9 Before me; 4,— Notar)�,Public Notary commission issued in tee'-� ounty My commission expires: 2/10/07 <23e566.1/e2j@011. VMI> t MALONE PROPERTIES 122 Gallison Hill Rd. Montpelier, Vermont 05602 March 22, 2005 Ray Belair South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 South Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ray: Please find enclosed the partial mortgage release and transfer tax return for my Dorset Street property. Hopefully, this will fulfill the permit conditions. Sinc ely, Patrick Malone'�-- Email: patrick@together.net 802-223-9954 • Fax: 802-229-9009 • Cell: 802-793-0179 Commercial Real Estate / Leasing / Development dui asw ` RS& NOTICE OF CONDITION OF APPROVAL 4 WHEREAS, the South Burlington Development Review Board (the "Board") granted final plat approval #SD-4-80 dated December 14, 2004 to Patrick Malone ("Malone") for various improvements at Malone's property located at 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive, under the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of South Burlington as shown on a plat entitled: "Survey of Land Owned by Patrick Malone, 4358 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Gregory F. DuBois, L.S., dated September, 2004, last revised •( O� , 44$5-and recorded in Map Volume _ at Page _ (Map Slide ) of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"); and WHEREAS, Condition 415 of the Board's approval requires Malone to record allotice of Condition in the City of South Burlington Land Records indicating that Malone will provide the owner ofthe propertyto the north (shown on the Plat as "N/F/ Champlain Oil Company, Inc."), an access easement to Malone's property if deemed necessary by the Board in connection with a plan approved by the Board for the development of the property to the north. NOW THEREFORE, to provide actual notice in the South Burlington City Land Records, the undersigned in receipt of consideration of the approval of the Board and othervaluable consideration, hereby acknowledges and accepts the following condition and covenant as binding upon and running with the land: l . Malone hereby covenants and agrees to provide the adjacent property owner to the north of the Malone property as shown on the Plat with an access easement if such access easement is deemed necessary by the Board in connection with its review of a plan for the development of the property to the north; subject, however, to standard requirements that the parties mutually agree to the location of the easement, that the easement will not unreasonably interfere with Malone's use of his land or the existing structures and uses thereon, and that the grantee of the easement will maintain the easement area on a pro rata basis and will indemnify, defend and save Malone harmless from any claims arising from the use of such easement. 2. This Notice of Condition of Approval shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referenced in any Deed conveying a lot or interest in Malone's property. This Notice of Condition of Approval shall be jbinding upon the Malone and his heirs and assigns. Dated at S - U��� T��1, Vermont, this Play of (Y)CLCd-1 , 2005. IN PRESENCE OF: � f N Witnes FWrick Malone STATE OF VERMQNT COUNTY OF C6J., SS. On this -ILt day of i°1 &�@ , 2005, personally appeared PATRICK MALONE, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed. r Before me, I Notary Public Snwicr Wa-mc Dccd to Chy of South Burlington (Soudt Mutc Roads)/201561/4b.$WI I1. WPD/MNF• Notary commission issued in m My commission expires: 2/10/07 —2— Assam") MALONE PROPERTIES 122 Gallison Hill Rd. Montpelier, Vermont 05602 February 10, 2005 Ray Belair City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning Dept. South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ray: Please find enclosed a milar plat of my 358 Dorset Street property for your files. The legal easement is in process by my attorneys at Gravel & Shea and they will submit it to the city attorney promptly. W ds, ne�� Email: patrick@togethernet 802-223-9954 • Fax: 802-229-9009 • Cell: 802-793-0179 Commercial Real Estate / Leasing / Development CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNEqG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 28, 2005 Pat Malone 122 Gallison Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Re.- 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Malone: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, February 1, 2005 at 7.30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McD nough Administrative Assistant Encl. (CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 3, 2005 Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: Design Review Application #DR-04-09 Dear Mr. Malone. - Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 2/1/05 (effective 2/3/05). If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. Permit Number SD- �- 6a CITY OF SOUTH BURI_,INGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Nance as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Patrick Malone, 122 Gallison Hill Rd., Montpelier, VT 05602 Office: 223-9954 Fax: 229-9009 Cell: 793-0179 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 666, pages 6 81- 6 8 4 3) APPLICANT (Name, availing address, phone and fax #) Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as above n • . • igemo 6) TAX PARCEL III # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Map 25, Lot 16 a) Existing uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 3600 sq . f t . Y _ storage; 8000 sa.ft. recreation/entertainment & retail; 5200 sa.ft.retail b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 5200 sq.ft, recreation/entertainment; 8000 sq.ft, retail. c) Total building square foota e on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 16,800 existing; 1 200 propose d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Existing single floor; Proposed single floor. e) plumber of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) Proposed 3 office, 7 non -office g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. Merging of two lnts and creating a P.U.D. 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class 1, II, or III) on the subject property? NO b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? N/A c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: 44,564 sq. ft. b) Building Coverage: Existing 16, 8 0 0 square feet 38.7 % Proposed 13, 2 0 0 square feet 29.6 % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 35,991 square feet 8 0. 6 % Proposed 36,854 square feet 8 2. 7 % 2 d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Dorset S t .Existing 2500 square feet 5. 6 % San Remo Dr. Existing 875 sq.ft. 1.9% Proposed square feet % Same as above 10) WAIVERS REQUESTED - SEE ATTACHED REPORT a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking Shared parking waiver 11) COST ESTIMATES SEE ATTACHED PROPOSAL a) Building (including interior renovations) $ 6 0, 0 0 0 b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Regrad & repave parking and add storm drain, $45,000. 12) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC - SEE ATTACHED REPORT a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 40.1 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Saturda 15) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE September 2005 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. IGNAWF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 4 EXHIBIT A The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred). o Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared. o Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.) o Location of easements, public lands, r.o.w.s, sidewalks, and public or private street (w/names). o Five foot contours (existing and finished). o Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. o Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks, and other public opens spaces. o Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. o Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative water supply. o Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. o Details of storm water facilities in the form of a drainage plan. o Details of all proposed bridges or culverts. o Location of temporary markers. o All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions. o A list of waivers desired (if any). o Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates). o A report addressing planned residential/unit development criteria in 15.18 of the Land Development Regulations. o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size). o Location of abutting properties, fie hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Number & location of parking spaces (see Section 13.01 of the Land Development Regulations). o Number & location of handicapped spaces (see Section 13.01(I) of the Land Development Regulations). o Lot coverage information: Building coverage, overall coverage, front yard coverage(s), and total lot size. o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section 13.01(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations. o If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ❑ Final Plat, Minor Subdivision $ 260.00* ❑ Final Plat, Major Subdivision or PUD $ 5,al,O-W* ❑ Final Plat Amendment $ 160.00* *Includes $10.00 recording fee 5 Civil & Structural Engineers "��0, N % j Richard S. Dewolfe, PE Christopher J. Temple, PE ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Nathan M. Phillips, PE I N C O R P O R A T E D September 18, 2004 Pat Malone Surveying Statewide Distributing 122 Gallison Hill Road Permitting Montpelier, VT 05602 Site Design Subject: Information for Development Review Board Subdivisions 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vt. Timber Design Dear Pat: Expert Testimony The following information will be required for the Development Review Board Site Development to grant you site plan approval. Act 250 Permitting Traffic Analysis Forensic Engineering Research of the existing permit shows that there are currently 73.7 peak hour Environmental Permitting trips permitted for this site. The project as currently proposed would produce Transportation Engineering 40.1 peak hour trips according to Ray Belair's calculation. Therefore, I recommend you request the board to bank the remaining trips, 33.6, for other Structural Inspection Services uses since tenants for the retail space are yet to be defined. Commercial Building Design Shared Parking Analysis Construction Oversight Attached is a spread sheet detailing the shared parking for the mixed uses Building Assessment currently proposed on site. I have expanded from our original sheet to better pedestrian Bridges define the weekend use when the recreational use will be highest. Stream Alterations Site Plan Sewer Design We have added the 7 foot easement to the City of South Burlington for Water Supply construction of the future sidewalk. We have also revised the landscaping plan to be in conformance with the city's tree scape plan. Storm Water I suggest that you file your application for preliminary and final site plan Hydrology approval concurrently since I believe we had a very comprehensive sketch Grading plan review and there are no outstanding issues between you and the city. Sincerely, �.L 'J 'is,"D 81 River Street Richard S. DeWolfe, P.E. PO. Box 1576 Montpelier, Vermont Enclosure 05601-1576 phone: 802.223.4727 fax: 802.223.4740 \\Server1\server\Jobfiles\04008 Burlington BilliardsTOM04008 9182004patmalonempd www.dirtsteel.com Patrick Malone Prepared by: Richard S. DeWolfe, P.E. Shared Parking Analysis DeWolfe Engineering Associates, Inc. 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 18-Sep-04 Building Use Size Occupancy Peak Parking Weekday Morning Weekday Lunch Weekday Afternoon (10-11am) (12-2 pm) (3-4 pm) 1000 SF Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Retail 8 n/a 5 40 0.7 28 0.85 34 - 0.8 32 Amusement 5.2 60 3/space 20 0 0 0.4 8 0.4 8 Total Spaces Required 60 28 42 40 Weekday Evening Weekday Late Night Weekday Early Morning (7-9 pm) (9pm-2 am) (2am-9am) Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces 0.8 32 0 0 0 0 0.5 10 0.5 10 0 0 Total Spaces Required 42 10 0 Building Use Size Occupancy Peak Parking Saturday Midday Saturday Saturday Saturday (12-2 pm) (2-4 pm) (6-8 pm) (8pm-2am) 1000 SF Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Retail 8 n/a 5 40 1 40 0.8 32 0.5 20 0 0 Amusement 5.2 60 3/space 20 0.4 8 0.6 12 1 20 0.75 15 Total Spaces Required 60 48 44 40 15 Sunday Midday Sunday Sunday Sunday (12-2 am) (2-4 pm) (6-8 pm) (8pm-2am) Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces 0.9 36 0.8 32 0.3 12 0 0 0.4 8 0.5 10 0.8 16 0.5 10 Total Spaces Required 44 42 28 10 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING 1drb1sublmalonelsketch doc All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). he plans do not depict any dumpsters on the subject property. 13. The plans should be revised to clearly depict and label all dumpsters on the subject PUD, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. Landscaping The landscaping for the proposed project will have to be in compliance with Sections 13.06(F) and 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations. 14. The applicant should submit a landscape plan and budget in compliance with Sections 13.06(F) and 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations with the preliminary plat application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The proposed snow storage area is depicted on the plans. �affic According to the ITE Manual, Ph Edition, the indoor recreational facility (LU: 437) is estimated to generate 3.54 vte per 1,000 square feet in the P.M. peak -hour. Thus, the proposed indoor recreation facility is estimated to generate 18.4 vte in the P.M. peak -hour. The retail business (LU: 814) is estimated to generate 2.71 vte per 1,000 square feet in the P.M. peak -hour. Thus, the proposed retail business is estimated to generate 21.7 vte in the P.M. Peak -hour. The property is therefore estimated to generate 40.1 vte in the P.M. peak -hour. 15. The applicant will be required to pay the applicable traffic impact fees for the difference in trip ends between the what the subject property is currently approved for and the 40.1 vte that the proposed project is estimated to generate, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Other The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated August 12, 2004 (attached). 16. The plans should be revised to comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his comments dated August 12, 2004, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. 17. The applicant should submit a property boundary survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor with the preliminary plat application. This survey should include all existing easements on the property. The floor area ratio (F.A. R.) for this property will be 0.3. The maximum allowed in the CD2 Zoning District is 0.5. 10/01/2004 FRI 10:20 FAX 802 860 2936 Four Seasons 472 Marshaill Avenue, WURSton, Vermont 05495 $02,658.2433 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL. SHEET — ------ — .. . .......... __ ..._. . Patrick Malone Lave Vachias COMPANY: DATE: Malone Properties 10/1/2004 FAX NUMBF Its TO')'AI. NO, Or PAGES IM MUDING LAVER —� 229-9009 3 P1IONE N IZVE& SENDER'S REFERENCE NUM88R ---- -- -- — 223.9954 Esti mte 347128, revised 10/ 1/04 RE: YOUR RFPFRF.NCC NVMHE•R --- +-- -- 358 Dorset St., S. Burl. 11 URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW 13 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE REC'i C` Pat, I hope you can read the symbols I've penciled in on the plan. I included the sign and the cable box its uie front bed planting so that mowing maintenance will be easier. Here is the general idea of the plantings: • All plants were chosen on the basis of low-maintnenace.. • All plantings have a rmtun height of V or less so that they will not obscure the the from entrance. 'Ile onlyexceptionu the hydrangea, which is off to the side. • Plantings are intentionally dense to discourage traffic through the bed and to reduce c Teding. All plants can withstand heavy pruning if they get out-of-bounds. • A hedge of dwaf Aododendrons is used as a border to the walkway. • Everblooming, low -maintenance roses surround the sign. • Evergreen hollies cover the base of the lalnp post. • Potentlll<as obscum the green cable box. • Red -leaved wrigelas provide summer contrast while dwarf red -twigged dogwoods pro\�6e into rL st. Pat, I've given you spring discounts on the plantings since we would have to order most of Lhu and I'Ln assuming at this point that this will probably be a spring project to be done after rmajor rrnu aLions h: been completed. Let me know if you have questions. 101/01/2004 FRI 10,21.'FAX 802 660 2936 Four Seasons VrLandsc Most compiwurcc c Landscape Rcywurcc GARDEN 7t� CENTER rr f��„ 472 Marshall Avc. WjIbAun, Vemiunt 05495 (802) 658.24:3:3 F-ix (802) 860.2936 �39954 358 SIN PEM RENOVATIONS NET 30 DAYS IVILONE WERTIES C/O PATRICK PWLONE '. 1?� GALLISON.:HILL, R11 ,..- �iii:s;t: }. •?i6: •:r:::•sr., sr,: {$0E)11r3"995':'sit, .rtr'i:. :;e'sriez s ..y,. t'.i�ct,.,.s};i:i:r lei.:.. slit}t': 7 ii ti•. ...._...,....._._.........t.xr..dtnia`i.'txL.........................u... u...... „ur u,..I„ ...-_ ... LN N T 8HIPPEO sKu my Ems'. DATE: 9/22/04 12002/003 PAGE NO 1 10/ 1/214 10:01 DODO. 3Y7128 *******0**** It ESTIMATE 'lFii'lfiF%lfififififiF3t' ;S :i5JCi: 4", �i. Vv t�'Sr:'_•':.i'SJ:t :: ' + t ..�dJl;.^...:�....:�:�. ..,..tr•:rtx::1::::..,,.•Lt::!',Y,ti:S:at::..t.:.:,..,.n........:..:... .....: , - -- '• � DESCRIPTION UNITS I PRICE / PER EXTENSION �..... ., mow.cru r� LVV. VU y 2 I EA UTCSKIC250 HONEYLOCUST SKYLINE 2 1/2-3" 49V?9 1 250.00 /EA 250.80 S 3 11 EA CR8SRKL?1W2 D06WO KEISEYI DWRF RID TWIU 26 a,99 11 17,50 /EA 4.1 1 ` ' 'EA ILXMSBPEME HOLLY BLUE PRI}QCE 2 GAL 42.99 28, dFr /EA 26. 9d c 5 13 . EA RSARGKMM RO5A KNOCK OUT 2 UAL 29.99 13 19,U E 7. •''EA PTNFRrA2T002 • PUTENTILLA GOLDFING9, 2+3 G 32.997 221.50 /'..A ?50.Sa S 7 1 EA HDNPti C}Z@@2 HYDFA}!EA PEE GEE COMPACTA 20 39.99 i 26. 8 9:. -EA RHDHWEt,PM . RHMuDENDR{)N AJM ELITE 2G 42.99 9 28. t30 /EA 252. 5 9 5 ,.FA'"WGLFLWFt2Z0l3C WEIGFIA.WIWE AI J:,RUUSES 2•,GAL .32.99 5 21.58 /EA 107.53 S ':YVZOMPOSTM ' 44.00 E.50 34.80 nD 12 , ..: 3.; lD;.;NMSLK1080. H 00. t:ym A 3 3b.00 rfD 103. ea N ;,S, EfiJ,'L861If5••. AT.M' 5.S ,GF , �frt,99 f8..56 /EA •14:.. , .. fFA .:E88861E', „ . Sc.iB' 6, „21,59 /EA 21.5? ,1 :.: .;ER165 r 'J.:�RI:ANT',"w.fART�'':GAL��;:,�.' •ii4:99 :2:.,. , 1Tx: ,EA- 6; 49�08 /f A : VI'1PMC" it• ..: .:rt a::.:i:f•.•.�: .3. ..49 �::::.:::: :32••'i , .3E.'6@ ,IEA. ,.1.t@�C4r09 N DiXIiIERVzONE7:.1........ ,, , r ,...3.....l,....._.........._.... .t . 1.. ,,, ..... .. ...... ... .. -.. a.. .. Stn.•..:ir.................................J......,.,.•..............,..................-....� :..i.r-....: .....,. ....... .............,... ...,.w.. .. r...... r. .::.i • ................a, !. .......,: i...,n . ,,...,,..•,., .,,...,.... a.:•t:,i„' __ ...., , . , .,� •',,..,�, . .................r..aJ,....,,.,.r.........:,: t:a.....tt.}.,..rati .L:a.^.;:::; _: L. ,.. i..f..'; tS.. i.,...�,..,jm i..,.,-„ rZL'........_.• JS::a::n.....rJ:i:: ;:}.•iai:: :.r.nt.au.r...•,f .... .:i.:........... :: :::Y:LJt:Rt:�: ..I. .o-..•:., ,, i�. . s17; 1.1rsst. lt::Y,J.` :rtir: J 11-4 � •r ..i. , t a." tJ:a:.::Si1S: . 1:$fSf:: •:iarl.. ::3::5 t" •:+.••• G:::A::. .r;i..;.. •1 ,•....,,,. dr .nt,,., rt..n',a..., S .t r.. vSt ,,.•.:.!,,..: Jt.i .. ,...r.ir#...l.:z:3JJib. .a •.,.., :: i:Ca:::J:ta.. ..�lft1.' a .. a1.r:: if '1•I . . r• , ..a i:�. .y tw�ti:r•:yar:;l; • C:Si:itii.JJ' . J,ir :}'.r""""'::J:-aI"'i•SJ :?ta""'•`�St:ti:�'3:.3::::::'. .n , rr$.u•..aS.ti... ...... ' ,:I:t' •iiiil=l�.,.,l,r �tl:t.........lJ.-:R,.J..S...TS:Sir .... ..ti. Si r ,...,••,.n• .• ..... S..J.{�} r•:li?•t1.....i... tar....... •. ,a.nn....,,• ..u. rrn„ > ,.•,. �� , ;.... ., • ,.. nL....:: nJ...,•,...-,.i•.-. r.l. n, t�}3 ....wY...r ....__l!.. t..J. r�}i... �.a•.....r,..n-r•r.........L.i..ri,itip.,t•r,.jT;-,!#:�it:ititl.... J..r`S.. ...t...t} i,SJ.}i7:ISt-,,.Z`l:r7iSl7}ir#sas?.iZ/l�l�lJ#:::}Tr::lt(#'}f}. •t�. Sij7:Ji; ••; .,,..5:..................... . . .1....3., •ii:lt:li' 'J!! iiS/.'�... 41:...., i�Lllul.,,, it•url •.n• .y„ ,.rSrr, I,.,.,.,.•ri tiY:{:tt::::::::::::::`: •r..r........ .. , i••sr. s.: ........ ; .,........,u..r ............. ,,...r.,.,... .., ..a.rar....R...t,tt•...r..tarp.{.�,...I. S. TI#li... tiSiit =:.! i daa•�l 3 i 2 t;t J ....:"';:::: .,L., t.: ....Jn.....t. i.. a • . f : '•S' ar•i: ,y,.,,,,. .lf�{.} . .,S,aJ;ri.}.11lrFt'}}.. ii �:�Yr:.:.fSi...r;i...i..... «.a.3...r...tt...r3...,... •:llrrir =ti}s?ii }i:?'rI # f }s:.Ft:• rt ti}.,,. t H 1UH :'lies}! '•t i..sr i u:r.,iJ }r L.s::t.. 2: J.t uti:u� ;:, .. n,..aurJr�j:• r t ..,. j i. S S tt`` } L� .r. J{3,i .a...! r ' •t:.a.....:':'::YJ:`:':::::. ...: .•...r♦.r• . u.. u.l,rnu.i. S?r't�r, ,!•t7 S`},t..li}rr ••}'i ui ii r,.�...; fiiiv,r.S3J;,..i.C,+::}rif:r,r . 3:J`.+.SJSi JiS.J,.. i,.J.f, w,...,.,.. ai.:`:ittii?t . � ! .JJ. �. :'JalJS S!"ii :'1'• S • }"i' 4i. +. ..uaa.,a»... I, wiir i.. rt. ..TrR:r N ri.. i � i2?:it:.},....t.tls. .t.l.}r}i'ta�1f. t i 7.L Sai �. t`i. , . 3..5. }tJ : r'::i:::::t:.::::::.:i.'S .»...a.,.,r.r.., r„r.arr,.,.7rritt, ,rr:.it;•xi.3xt7;rtli, . r ,J n}.,flfttJ.L�r...}:#Fi"i:'iiift...ir.ti,iir..7 7 u:.i. ppsrl4iziir r.............. .. r.r.r •... r ..t.... i t .-..... ..,... : , . �r„ n . r : ..}t . tl�r,. •,LlJ7t}Ltt,n.,.. .,rL,••... ,.r. rr+ ,•u.............. :;1:i:t............t....a•Jrt:at:i i }r t.:.Y .... .Zrl::itL...�?.ti...... .t I ! rt.r .a.. na !3S .�a u . •. n•' ... ....-r-•u ..,,...v.l.J.tlat....a+„ i......pp�... ..tt .{j t t t' Y.J.aJ t : I{.. .{.S.t S tJJSSL"�i.-.. n... •.it::::tf:::::1tr. ,....a.... r,. .+.. •...:.; .. rr.+... oa1,..Ydr �r Hl1,+l,nln ull7lr,:ltttr: r,}t rr rM.;fll . . j�,•�L7�f�i:3irlt�rlJ=:=:t:"{.f:fil}ittaf,:,.firl.,-... i.•:•':$::.:::...... + :aL ..... i«....... nl•t. •..i. wt� <.. r..,. n.,• rr •,aa. 7 :fC::.•..la:::rtr..,r...... r.a.«. • •i:i3i:t.aa r S.. Siit3 •.1.la:tSr Ilit'trta•"::L:jN.Jt:: i ... ........ ......y......a..,µ• ,tttri,•..t+JL.iitr,l.wa.•....;.}rtr,irL., r:'}.. . r r ,t ,! • Z:t/J?SSP...}...lriatfJ:.. ...5 :1.....a fii;•• 71i•3. r............. ... .. ..:.Z Z 5.,..ryv. •....:itf•.r. r........ ..... r, :,. a.. .... J..,....•, ,_ ... G-1 ,: _. NON-TAXABLE lac^?.5u # ESTIMATE ESTINTE H ESTIMATE H ESTIMATE > SUBTOTAL 3441.47 DOWNCAST LIGHTS TYPICAL OF (4) R 17 TA I L C P A CE 5100 SF STONE UNDER- ROOF cvFP F L., EL, I DOW, J + A JJ 41 Pvc Uti ri cQnpVlt M 21 Ga X0 cs Rim 7 ,r)v=94.5 to 99,0, 1 SPA,-- . Bit Conc. -til soft Ouft Story B dg ;j' 7-, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERIWONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 27, 2004 Patrick Malone 122 Gailison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Malone: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the December 7, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. t-�Jcsl� e -� Le- r u r 1 r DECEMBER 2004 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 7 December 2004, at 8:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; L. Kupferman, M. Kupersmith, C. Bolton, G. Quimby, R. Farley, M. Boucher Also Present: R Belair, Administrative Officer; B. Robertson, Associate Planner; N. Thorneloe, A. Tremble, D. Gonsalves, M. Gariety, M. Bohon, C. O'Neal, D. Gonsalves, N. Hellen, K. Alence, R. & P. Powers, E. Thomas, R. Krupp, J. Mittendorf, L. Oligino, K. DeWolfe, L. Bresee, B. Coates, B. Gardner, J. Kilcoyne, T. Gresham, S. Guild 1.Other Business: The Chair noted the presence of Boy Scouts from Troop 639 who were filling the requirement for citizenship by attending a public meeting. 2. Minutes of 9 November 2004: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 9 November as written. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Messrs. Farley and Kupferman abstaining. 3. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-04-76 of Barbara Neff to subdivide a 17.09 acre parcel into two lots of 0.92 acres (lot A) and 16.17 acres (lot B), 700 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Belair noted that this was an approved subdivision for which the mylar was never tiled. It is the exact same plan that the Board approved. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-04-76 of Barbara Neff subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. ublic Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-79 and Final Plat pplication #SD-04-80 of Patrick Malone to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 16,800 sq. ft. building with multiple uses. The amendment consists of: 1) razing a 3600 sq. ft. portion of the building thereby creating two separate -1- buildings, 2) converting the 8000 sq. ft. building at 358 Dorset St. To retail, and 3) converting the 5200 sq. ft. building at 55 San Beano Dr. To indoor recreation: Mr. Dinklage asked if the applicant will be making the pre-existing non -conformity worse. Mr. Belair said if anything, they are making it better. Mr. DeWolfe showed the plan with improvements to the property as follows: l . They are removing a center section from the building to provide additional parking. 2. There will be facade improvements (to be approved by the Design Review Board). 3. There will be landscape improvements on both the Dorset St. and San Remo Drive sides. 4. There will be a new concrete sidewalk. 5. There will be additional parking. The current uses of the building are Burlington Billiards (which will move to the other side of the building) and vacant space. Mr. Dinklage asked if there would be any change to the flow of runoff from the property. Mr. DeWolfe said no. Water runs to the southwesterly side. They will extend the system to the southwest corner of the new parking lot. The San Remo side drains to San Remo Dr. Mr. Belair said staff has no issues with drainage. Mr. Belair noted the applicant will provide a 7' easement along San Remo so the city can install a sidewalk. Mr. DeWolfe said they will replace an existing tree when the sidewalk has been installed. The tree complies with the city's landscape plan for that side of San Remo. Mr. Boucher asked about an easement to connect to Champlain Oil which was discussed at sketch. After some discussion representatives from Champlain Oil and the applicant agreed that they would provide mutual easements to connect the 2 properties in the middle. The approval motion was amended to add the following stipulation: Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant shall record a "Notice of Condition" in the South Burlington Land Records, which has been approved by the City Attorney, indicating that the -2- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 7 DECEMBER 2004 applicant will provide the owner of the property to the north an access easement to the applicant's property, if deemed necessary by the Development Review Board in connection with a plan approved for development of the property to the north. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Preliminary Plat #SD-04-79 and Final Plat #SD-04-80 of Patrick Malone subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-77 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-78 of Michael Gravelin, dba A & M Construction Corp., for a planned unit development to convert a 2142 sq. ft. single family dwelling to Day Care and/or General Office use, 1060 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Belair said the applicant has asked to continue because of a missing survey plat. There are some issues which also need to be resolved including 2 maple trees which the neighbor would like to have remain and a drainage issue which may require changing the drainage system. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-77 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-78 of Michael Gravelin until 18 January 2005. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site Plan Application #SD-04-46 of Ichiban Oishii, inc., to amend a previously approved plan for a 123 seat standard restaurant. The amendment consists of. 1) constructing a 500 sq. ft. addition to the restaurant, and 2) constructing a 38 space parking lot expansion, 792 Shelburne Road: Mr. Belair noted the parking lot had already been constructed without approval and without a permit. It does not comply with landscaping requirements. Mr. Belair then reviewed the history of the property. It was subdivided from a property off Swift St. All traffic was to be directed from the upper parking lot to Swift St. The exit will have to be narrowed and signed to this effect. He suggested one-way traffic through the area. They could then angle parking and not have as much pavement. Mr. Dinklage asked why there are so few parking spaces. Mr. Belair said he wasn't sure whether these were built from the old regulations or the new. He will check on this as requirements have been increased -3- r DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONE'14G 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 15, 2004 Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-79 & Final Plat Application #SD-04-80 Dear Mr. Malone: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on December 14, 2004 (effective 12/14/04). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 90 days (must be submitted by 3/14/05) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, i Betsy Mc onough, Administrate e Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: November 29, 2004 \drb\sub\malone\preliminary_final.doc Plans received: November 2, 2004 358 DORSET STREET & 55 SAN REMO DRIVE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-79 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-80 Agenda #3 Meeting date: December 7, 2004 Owner/Applicant Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Engineer Property Information DeWolfe Engineering Associates, Inc. Tax Parcel 0570-00358-C PO Box 1576 Volume 666, Pages 681-684 Montpelier, VT 05601-1576 Central District 2 (CD2) 1.02 acres M CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone\preliminary final doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION Patrick Malone, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting preliminary plat and final plat approval of a planned unit development for a project consisting of: 1) removing a 3,600 sq. ft. section in the center of the existing building to create two (2) separate buildings, 2) developing the 358 Dorset Street building with 8,000 sq. ft. of retail space, and 3) developing the 55 San Remo Drive building with 5,200 sq. ft. of indoor recreation use. The sketch plan was reviewed on August 17, 2004 (minutes enclosed). COMMENTS Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on November 2, 2004 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS The proposed project is in compliance with most of the dimensional standards for the CD2 Zoning District. The lot size and setbacks will remain unchanged. The building coverage will be reduced from 38.7% to 29.6%, which is under the 40% allowed in the CD2 Zoning District. The overall coverage will be increased from 80.6% to 82.7%, which is under the 90% allowed in the CD2 Zoning District. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the proposed Land Development Regulations PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. The building that is being modified is currently connected to the municipal water system. 1. If needed, the applicant must obtain final wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hoover, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 2. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations_ The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone\preliminary final doc The subject property is currently served by an 18' wide curb -cut off of San Remo Drive and a 26' wide curb -cut off of Dorset Street. Neither of these curb -cuts will change as a result of the proposed project. Circulation on the site should be adequate. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. There are no wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, or unique natural features on the subject property. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels the proposed project is in conformance with the stated purpose of the Central District, as outlined in Section 8.01 of the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Open space requirements are not applicable to the proposed project. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The building that is being modified is already in existence, so staff does not feel that the Fire Chief needs to review the plans. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The proposed project will not affect the extension of utilities and infrastructure to adjacent properties. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed building with the design review applicant. However, these lighting fixtures were not in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. Additional lighting details were not submitted with the preliminary or final plat applications. 3. Exterior lighting details for the building, in accordance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations, should be submitted with the preliminary plat application. 4. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed project is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Indoor recreation facilities and retail services are permitted uses in the CD2 Zoning District. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone\preliminary final doc SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The proposed project will remove the center portion of the existing building on the subject property. Staff does not feel that this modification will not have a significant affect on the relationship between structure and the site, the relationship between structure and structure, planting areas, or pedestrian movement. Pursuant to Table 13-1 of the Land Development Regulations, the indoor recreation facility will require 0.33 parking spaces per person in maximum occupancy permitted. The applicant has stated that the 5,200 square foot indoor recreation facility space will have a maximum occupancy of 60 persons. Thus, twenty (20) parking spaces will be required to serve the indoor recreation facility space. Pursuant to Table 13-1 of the Land Development Regulations, the retail business use will require 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). The applicant is proposing to dedicate 8,000 square feet to retail business use, and therefore would require forty (40) parking spaces. So, the entire property will require sixty (60) parking spaces to accommodate the proposed uses. The site currently provides fifty (50) parking spaces. The applicant submitted a shared parking analysis in compliance with Section 13.01(E) of the Land Development Regulations. This analysis indicates that the proposed uses on the subject property will require a maximum of forty-eight (48) parking spaces, which are being provided. In addition, the plans depict the two (2) handicapped -accessible parking spaces required by Section 13.01(1) of the Land Development Regulations. The plans depict a bicycle rack. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The existing parking is located along the side of the existing building. The proposed parking will be behind the two (2) proposed buildings, relative to the public streets. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The proposed project will not result in any changes to the height of the existing structure. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The subject lot is within the City Center Design Review Overlay District 2. Thus, the South Burlington Design Review Committee shall review the proposed project, prior to any exterior renovations. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone\preliminary final doc 5. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for any exterior modifications to the existing building, the applicant shall submit a design review application to the Design Review Committee for review and subsequent approval by the Development Review Board. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The subject lot is within the City Center Design Review Overlay District 2. Thus, the South Burlington Design Review Committee will review the proposed project to ensure that this requirement is being met. In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The applicant will be required to provide the City with a 7' wide easement along San Remo Drive to accommodate a future sidewalk. This easement is depicted on the plans as a proposed easement. It is not depicted on the survey plat. 6. The survey plat shall be revised to depict a 7' wide easement along San Remo Drive, prior to recording of the final plat plans. 7. The plans shall be revised to eliminate the word "proposed" when referring to the 7' wide easement along San Remo Drive, prior to recording of the final plat plans. 8. The applicant shall submit legal documents for the seven (7) foot sidewalk easement, which shall be approved by the City Attomey and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans depict an adequately screened dumpster. Landscaping The applicant has stated that the proposed project will cost approximately $60,000. Pursuant to Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations, the project requires a minimum landscape value of $1, 800. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan and budget that indicates $3,440 worth of landscaping will be planted. Thus plan and budget include the required Chanticleer Callery Pear that is part of the San Remo CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone preliminary final doc Drive Streetscape Plan. This tree will not be planted until the completion of the new sidewalk. The landscape plan refers to the correct 3-3.5" tree, while the landscape budget refers to a 2-2.5" tree. 9. The landscape budget shall be revised to refer to a 3-3.5" Chanticleer Callery Pear, prior to final plat approval. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The proposed snow storage area is depicted on the plans. Traffic According to the ITE Manual, 71h Edition, the indoor recreational facility (LU: 437) is estimated to generate 3.54 vte per 1,000 square feet in the P.M. peak -hour. Thus, the proposed indoor recreation facility is estimated to generate 18.4 vte in the P.M. peak -hour. The retail business (LU: 814) is estimated to generate 2.71 vte per 1,000 square feet in the P.M. peak -hour. Thus, the proposed retail business is estimated to generate 21.7 vte in the P.M. Peak -hour. The property is therefore estimated to generate 40.1 vte in the P.M. peak -hour. In the most recent approval (effective March 15, 1994), the Planning Commission granted the subject property a traffic budget of 73.7 P.M. peak -hour vte. The proposed estimated traffic generation is within this budget, and therefore the applicant is not required to pay any additional traffic impact fees. Other The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated August 19, 2004 (attached). The applicant complied with some of the City Engineer's requests in the time between the sketch plan review and the submittal of the subject application. However, some of the City Engineer's requests do not appear to have been met, including: showing the lot line along Dorset Street; showing the existing and proposed water lines; showing the proposed grade of the parking lot. 10. The plans should be revised to comply with the remaining requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his comments dated August 19, 2004 and mentioned above, prior to final plat approval. The floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for this property will be 0.3. The maximum allowed in the CD2 Zoning District is 0.5. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve preliminary plat application #SD-04-79 and and final plat application #SD-04-80, subject to the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Patrick Malone DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 AUGUST 2004 The lot has about 60 trees over 6 inches in girth. They would take out "suppressed" trees (those under the canopy). The canopy won't be changed by what they do. Mr. Bolton was concerned with setting a precedent. Mr. Griffin noted most of the neighbors have clear cut their trees. Mr. Kupferman asked if they are tearing down the house. Mr. Griffin said they will keep the foundation. Mr. Belair felt the plan will not adversely affect anyone's views of the lake and that what is proposed is very minor. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Application #CU-04-07 of Robert & Susan Griffin subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Sketch plan application #SD-04-54 of Patrick Malone for a planned unit development for a project consisting of. 1) removing a 3600 sq. ft. section in the center of the building to create two separate buildings, 2) developing the 358 Dorset Street building with 8000 sq. ft. of retail space, and 3) developing the 55 San Remo Drive building with 5200 sq. ft. of indoor recreation use: Mr. DeWolf said the project goes from Dorset St. back to San Remo Drive. They are asking for a 4 parking space waiver and feel this is justified because the peaks of the 2 uses are not the same. This is a 17% reduction request. There will be a new sidewalk along the face of the building. They will also add landscaping and update exterior lighting. There will be a new dumpster enclosure. Ms. Quimby asked about timing for dumpster servicing. She noted there is a lot of noise at 5 a.m. when dumpsters are emptied. Mr. Belair said that since this is adjacent to a residential neighborhood, there are noise performance standards that must be met. Mr. DeWolf said they will address that. A third handicapped parking space will be added. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 AUGUST 2004 Regarding the easement to Champlain Oil that staff is requesting, Mr DeWolf noted there is not a natural connection today. They can pursue this if the Board wishes. Mr. Belair said staff wants the option to connect the properties if the opportunity arises in the future, and will seek an easement from both properties. Ms. Kupersmith asked about the possibility of the retail business being open late so it would affect the shared parking situation. Mr. Belair said that will be part of the analysis. The applicant must show there won't be a conflict. Mr. DeWolf said they are also asking for a waiver on front yard coverage. There is no change from what is there now. Meeting the requirement would result in the loss of another parking space. They propose to maintain a larger green area and will relocate some plants from the front to that area. Mr. Belair said a sidewalk would be very desirable unless there are physical limitations. Mr. Kupferman said he wouldn't favor that if it limited parking. Mr. Jaeger noted there is an easement of 7 feet granted to the city by Munson. The applicant asked that preliminary and final plats be combined. Members felt the applicant would be taking a risk because of the parking, sidewalk and landscaping issues. Mr. Belair noted the applicant had asked to remove a front door which staff opposes. The applicant indicated they are OK with keeping it. Mr. Bolton asked for pictures to show where snow will be stored on the property. 9. Miscellaneous application #MS-04-02 of Maynard Auto Supply to: l) alter existing grade behind building, and 2) encroach into a Class II wetland buffer, 1725 Williston Rd: Mr. Collins reviewed the history of the request. He noted that fill was illegally brought onto the site. The State became involved, and the applicant has being doing what the State required. They are reducing the graveled area and adding plantings. Cathy O'Brien was consulted for recommendations and she approves of the plantings. Ms. Quimby asked if the applicant will get the floodlights into compliance. Mr. Belair said the applicant has to be willing to do this. -7- BILL SZYMANSKI, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 846-4106 (phone) 846-4101(fax) COMMENTS Patrick Malone Site Improvement Dorset Street — San Remo Drive 8/19/04 1. Lot must have dimensions. 2. Dorset Street lot line shall be shown. 3. Existing and proposed water and sewer lines shall be shown. 4. The sidewalk along San Remo Drive should be included. An easement will be required. The sidewalk shall be continuous across the driveways. 5. Re -grading and repaving of parking lot shall be shown on the plans. 10/01/2004 FRI 10:20 FAX 802 860 2936 Four Seasons Z,OJl 0o ONSW r GARDEN CENTER 472 Marshall Avenue, Wunnston, Vermont 0.5495 802,658,2433 FACSIMILE TKANSMITTAL SHEET —--..._._.. Patrick Malone Dave Vachi6s CoIAPA_NY: DATE: Malone Properties 10/l/2004 FAX NUMUKK: TOTAL, NO. OF PAGES IN(.UDING COVER - 229-9009 3 NIONE NU1ZEF. SENOWS REFERENCE NU 1BFR -- ----- ------- 223.9954 Estirmte 347128, revised 10/ 1/04 YOUR RFFF.RFNCG NVMSER — -�- — -- 358 Dorset St., S. Burl. Il URGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW © PLEASe COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASC RCCYCLF Pat, I hope you can read the symbols I've penciled in on the plan. I included the sign and the cable box un the front bed planting so that mowing maintenance will be easier. Here is the general idea of the plantings: • All plants were chosen on the basis of low•mam' tnenace. • All plantings have a mature height of 3' or less so that theywill not obscure the the from entrance. 'Ile onlyexception is the hydrangea, which is off to the. side. • Plantings are intentionally den se to discourage traffic through the bed and to reduce weeding. All plants can withstand heavy pruning if they get out-of-bounds. • A hedge of dwarf rhododendrons is used as a border to the walkway. • Everbloon ing, low maintenance roses surround the sign. • Ever�men hollies cover the base of the lamp post. • PotentAks obscure the green cable box. • Red -leaved weigelas provide summer contrast while dwarf red -twigged dogwoods provi&e war r intcrtst. Pat, I've given you spring discounts on the plantings since we would have to order most of this and I':-n assuming at this point that this will probably be a spring project to be done after major rcnovauoru h:.vc been completed. Let me know if you have questions. 10/01/2004 FRI 10:21 FAX 802 860 2936 Four Seasons 4SF 0NON VeLandscrmorn1v Most s o Resource ,•V1 Landscape Reswurcc CENTER I 472 Mamliall Avt. Wilgbwn, Wmiont 05495 (802) 658.2433 Fm (802) 860.2936 239954 358 SAN REND RENOVATIONS NET 30 DAYS i9A;.W POERTIES C/O PATRICK MAM. . 12214-LISO4.:HILL RD,: ::($�J`'s '► 't�1��iis, .ii.'.4. ::i::i:• i�i':.,:i�i�i, '�ii:i:i.. ..Si;i;iEd ;'ii:, ?�s • ............. :azfir, to:: .i,,;.:i:irr::::•::isr;7r as:' t : NI:•+ �s:iuyl.�.r•ii7..,1r:..5 .ua.,, •,t•••rJ.i.. ............. 5..::Si -1.•.L .,S�itlSi.. .J t, .n:i:i` I : SSi . •ti!lSJ.2J:' t . .r . .Sri., ... ....... ..__......_7_.. isS:Y3a.�...3".. ?.ISii:iSS::.i:::f;fi?6 . JiJ�.S7�.tj.SDr74:� �� 11i:i21_S.._9 i DAY EV, DATE: WU04 1002/003 PAGi' NO 1 10/ 1/04 10:91 DOG@ 347128 ,....� ...., .. ,. .. ... ESTIMATE `li,'Vf ;TAXA 'SSA S 'EST '34712@ h:i3• ,r:4t1 tll:rj: ri±ir......._....++..•.,...................... u.a _........ �. ,�... .. LN N I SHIPPED I ORDERED IJMj SKu ' DESCRIPTION KNITS PRICE / PER 1 1 EA PEiUCLCW 200 PEAR MTICLEER 2-,2 UE" ' 399.9. 1 EXTENSION 200. w /EA 2 1 EA 1ATCSK1C250 HONEYLOCUST SKYLINE 2 1/2-311' 499,:99 1 250.00 /EA 250.00 5 3 11 EA CRSSRKL2Z002 D06WMD KELSEYI DWRF REI) TWIG 20 2E,99 11 17,50 /EA 192rU S 4 ' 1 EA ILXR58P2Z002 HOLLY SLUE PRINCI. 2 MRL 42.99 1 28-00 /EA 28,98 S 5 13 EA RSAMKO2Z;if$2 RUSA KNOCK OUT 22 GAL 29.99 13 19, �k3 /EA 2q•3. S 7. .'EA PTNf CA2ZOW) PUTENTILLA GULDFING9, 2+3 G 32.99 7 21.50 /�_A 1G9.SO S 7 7 1 EA HDNMCi12Z092 14YDMNWA PEE GEE COMNCTA X 39.99 1 E6108 /FA �6 & S 8" 9:. .' TA h'4iDH1}MJEIEW RHODUDENDRON PJM ELITE ' 2G 42:99 9 28. 00 /EA �...EA 252. n S 9 � . • � "WGf.FLWR2Z0002 UMFIkWINE AlJ)D, Ras 2-GAL 5 21.50 /FA 107.50. S .32.99 if ... •.. GtiPiDt�_ ' THTI:RUR(.E 1 YARD 0 3rt, g0 � I Mix,C}I Ht7-4lpf BIA.Y I 43:8� 3'� /fD 3b 00 108.0a. N. 13: .... .YARD = :.5. ERs;.t 1115;:. • ; PEAT::19055. U.99 5 19..50 /EA 5e.53 ri tq':...... , • :1'c :EA;.;E5880IE :I7::.7 ji.. 21.59 /EA .. PIAtII+S f i ':GAI..:' ;18:•99, E a.}.19 /EA N.38 • . 17 '1&: :EA..:LAbOR ;FM V:J.A80R: i16 40.60 /EA. 648.00 N ,32.00 /EA 1,024.09 N 19 .1i:. �t:;F�:iL'i0i(E1 ,:' DEi:iilFRlF'ZONEt 1:. ... . ..... . . ........ ''1� 'C0:08'/EA �20:Fi9 <N .. .. 7 , _ ..,....�,.... - ... . n.,,r'�, il� :,.-� .�,.... ... ,. ... .�.. � ii: "ltr7.. ...........�.............•r, ..:.nu,,...+. .. .. . .. ....... ...........ai;t•. ,.tsi 7:;° .art;; cii•: ..,, ... ....... ..R: ':rlt f 1 ty. 7a7:. •.,., SR:Ci:.:.ii7f7:: Sita;' •2:::•' ::1•+ia'; .., .,.. __,..._......�.,... �. �... ........... ".,a:r,.......,.,.J. ..-, .....:.ri.�r .,.. ui2t::'::.a:.r._r:,:::.::..,.:.., `w.+,..:,.�..�,.�.•� ,............................:......,...i i. i.,;t,.,.,..,...,-._��.......�f......L...,ti...i.t.. lit' :Di:J i :Stf: - ... ...,,,. ..,....,.«. .. �,...r.....-.-..s 17T. .,iai2ttS„ ,Sri:;'f ::i:•S:: i.., i:,..l.l l,:1 r-:�. :...-,.., ..,, ri{..r_.,...,..�i3:^:^i:" ..S.,,iS:t,l•J7 .._ ; '..:.i.. �..... ... ull • :...•,�. � � u, . •. r',•r�..ii::l.�.r'i..ti5r.s,.,..1.....,r.........t I...s,.:,...,..ii:i: i •' �� „7::.:;'•..... ...t,...,. �....nr u.r.... i}i::.l�:�•.:.,..�.r...r.. ... ...........r.....,. l..n� ,: �rtr.l n.; ,r..t T.•� ,.r.., :rft:.t:i if:.,.1.,,:,..,..:^ !: :arS•i:� «•1 i I.7 ,9:ay. t^ts:S':S7.•i....:7i:; its::lt..,...:rr:.ri...t.i.,r.r�..,,...' ............ f .. i•r•.1:` (_�.f�::i,.a . J.:::= ::,n 1 :T::!T•.....D "ita ' a::t:tlt'7 : S1.L,. I :Lt:' ..S ..1`: i•.1....:.. •....,�,�.....Iii„ :r.,•' ..tD^s.2„ „t.' :r::.i.?!21 i•� •. .J,�.....J,t,tt,a7at3T:+' , 1'77:SY:":::11 ! ..t..S JIV . .ar �51:T iiii ::1.'•"'' 7 .rlYl,l. a, . Ii/jr,r.tl;ifrii:::i:i =;t:•;:.�"'::'a^:ai:' .is`:iu::'::'s;is:..,... , ,.s7:r' :'7t:; . : ! y:.:..;.,./ •iir.air„�.,r • ;•, ,. Yf;• •.I,.,ru,r,1 „Ii.'.:i lr ., �ii!r..,'i•l ... .,. :....,,.ii.l.{{!•7L2li'tltfiittY::::::7tfasr�t}s?7C;.,aa1:.7.:: fi7i.:.::::::r 't i, ii:aa:7: .. � „ ,,:,,>,l,,,,....d.,r,........,r.t 5,rr•51 ,ii., .•r...,,..7i.�,.L, .L.... ,....i..,,. ... 1.7:. ' 1C'.ai:::::i;9•tS��ilii :. r. l:l:a a D ti ' ..«.. .:}i Yil: i.. .rNli.. , 7. in�.r...l.nl�.i n..l ..,.�. �.... i � '. i if. Cr..s1 .IY. .4.... .,»•,..�±t;....., T;.I�r.r.�,. I •I rl t+i - .,, .Jti , . , ,._..,.I,•fu .,j„ ,.i' 1 : .}'::'iS:Kits . i'St. 'itr. 5r i.l I . a�' .. r,�. a tty..17t.11 Jjlun�J:.•i3G:� :"{ .:r! �n� j., 'YiiSftfiSii.;.......r . , I ttrird. r,. tii..12.,.:tisi3tiii...+lt' }'tittj� �ii,r.;tLtalt}!:r 3':tifiii, .ai. fi':.L:YL. �.it7i:".3. ,,. ..7r ,i.J,• ;,, , • rn i` aiti "f:•:�`P:• T: ':J:..:13•J:::::iJl:;i14, . . .[J.,• n�.•,�„f•,.1}t.v}r.•.••a�J7Jii:n.t,Tilt.{'ii..,ii, :r"'Ld.i,•:Iaii;:i:ii=.:it77, i .dj•.s ,r1. 1 / . a'ii .L tS..L. rt ;iri ir...i..,•sr i t,.....a,,f J. SyI.tS.,i lr...in.il"I:.. .a;7 ,r ._.Il.t... ; . t.•:,.I ..;�t,i•,i:••,t,1`Ji,...t.:i7�til..i.Fif.,i..F}.s}7litu},[i.;st'sti,{at{:iJ7JilJ.1f..3:f:ri(s l:t.. 7 {{ • r ` n.0 t ,.,yi ..1.,.." ..✓..... ,....rra. ,{ t .o.r r ^•J:: `:S:i:ti:::....,.r1DS:i:D , .r,3.ii: .57. t i2.. :Li»Ji ujl,nrl •-iiifl•r.. n.r..lau •rl... nrir'1.i::ii121 rvi t.,.t'l:.7J•s:c ti.if}i;f7ri:: CC lslyi�:. i } : un+�lw I I. Ti 7 1� �:fii: tff:ft:.i' �t Si;Jt•t,tl::'i:•.i_It::°•i':!" r.11r..1111 r51r I,r IJJr i,l 11{1,1 s(11511 :"rir. 1.rt. t,tvli t�:ri Nl�il•�`::i y7i'J' r,l I : 11 rlt•I:/�1 YirT1./rrrrl I}.. r .-..u.�j ..:� •1 ::irrr,:fli i . rl•Ku.+N. vl Ih .r1 IJr /I•/�1.Y1 • i.� .,sa1J1 t ,,..s,.... •,, r7r..:,a..,,l. r...,..,.{. 1, : •'"t: (.�•:1.?:i 4y: t:i • T� S:i:ivat.,ir[II:r. ... r, a..... :::•. Iri . «.1« t:i+iti't:: 3iaiJ i7J:i ia�iii::::'i'ii:�i�'3 :fiilh3it7 i7t::;t:;,:::.t u _. ,u•., , ,Iw . r .I rtH.:...S,ICr1:7. . . �Y•i... s .... .It,;,ss:.............r.. .1.a... .,.:» . ..,;ir.q« I rl, ri..,5, l,.l.rlr„,I,rr.lf 7.:t t a„r,a,r:r,,..,rr.r .:c1oe.,iLlhfli.4l,ru,..rH,.........♦♦1 jiuNNrr;.ifS�afIil r.....J Hlfn...,.... atria..,.Mr.YI/..«i.Jlllrrl"J ;IlW) urr I. :.. 1 ..11YI..11 f,rrW..r.1 Y:11/ rlr/ri: t I .•r,7T7J rni..i�. ;3 ir•r::,r :r, i:ftT.:`:• '•' i::.: } ,,;rt , { r�.� i,li t.i14 u S7'r ... ':t ..........a....y: ,1 . r7 , : t i .� • :.' •...._.. w".,J,. .. )1,J}J,d,,,,, :i.Jtl 111 . i 111.1. r:t:tl uJ � l-7 NON-TAXABLE 1��,5 ESTIMATE ESTIMATE #IF ESTIMATE #+} ESTIMATE +x SUFOTAL DOWNCAST LIGHTS TYPICAL OF (4) v O 6' Red ,,jple 7 ct + " v 10 CB Rim = 99,0 :riv=94-5 Bit. RETAIL ': , P,, CF 5100 SF --STONE OVER --UNDER- ROOF OVER FL. EL. REMOV A DI;- - WALK 41 Pvc Ut' Conuult Conc. Pc'vc-.Pr: � alft 0*4 a W.. - I story Blbg MNWM Permit Number SD - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Patrick Malone, 122 Gallison Hill Rd., Montpelier, VT 05602 -Offices 223-9954 Fax• 229-9009 C' 11. 793-0179 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same 666, pages 681-684 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) same 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 358 Dorset St. & 55 San Remo Dr. 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) Map 25, Lot 16 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 3600 S q , f t . storage, 8000 sq.ft. recreation -entertainment.& retail; 5200 sq ft retail b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 5200 sg.ft, recreation/entertainment; 8000 sq ft retail c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 16,800 existing; 13,200 proposed d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) existing single floor; proposed single floor. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A 0 Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) Proposed 3 office; 7 non office g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. Merging of two lots and creating a P.U.D. 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? N/A c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: 44,564 sq.ft. b) Building Coverage: Existing 16,800 square feet 3 8. 7 % Proposed 13, 2 0 0 square feet 29.6 % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 35,991 square feet 80.6 % Proposed 3 6, 8 5 4 square feet 8 2. 7 % 2 d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Dorset Existing 2500 square feet 5. 6 % San Remo 875 sq.feet 1.9% Proposed square feet % Same as above 10) WAIVERS REQUESTED - SEE ATTACHED REPORT a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking Shared parking waiver 11) COST ESTIMATES— SEE ATTACHED PROPOSAL a) Building (including interior renovations) $ 60,000 b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Regrade & repave parking and add storm drain, $45,000 12) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC _ SEE ATTACHED REPORT a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Saturday 40.1 15) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE September 2005 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date rd EXHIBIT A The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred). (Y' Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared. V' Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.) Location of easements, public lands, r.o.w.s, sidewalks, and public or private street (w/names). o- Five foot contours (existing and finished). ca- Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. a Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks, and other public opens spaces. o Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. o Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative water supply. a o Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. ®- Details of storm water facilities in the form of a drainage plan. c,-- Details of all proposed bridges or culverts. o- Location of temporary markers. o All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions. o A list of waivers desired (if any). o Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates). o A report addressing planned residential/unit development criteria in 15.18 of the Land Development Regulations. e Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size). v-- Location of abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping D- Number & location of parking spaces (see Section 13.01 of the Land Development Regulations). o,-' Number & location of handicapped spaces (see Section 13.01(I) of the Land Development Regulations). o Lot coverage information: Building coverage, overall coverage, front yard coverage(s), and total lot size. o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded. ,,o- Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) & Bicycle rack as required under Section 13.01(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations. ,,j 1) o If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE Final Plat, Minor Subdivision $ 260.00* "Final Plat, Major Subdivision or PUD $ 510.00* *Includes $10.00 recording fee 5 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner DATE: November 4, 2004 Cc: Patrick Malone DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Design Review Application DR-04-09 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Patrick Malone, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) replace existing metal siding with large profile, horizontal metal siding, 2) add brick to proposed entrances, 3) replace all doors and windows with metal frames, 4) install additional exterior lighting, and 5) add three (3) entrance shelters. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(b) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of an exterior wall of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements, and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. The proposed modifications are in compliance with this criterion. (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. Examples of unacceptable materials include metal skin and laminated Design Review Application DR-04-09 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Page 2 of 5 wood (e.g., T-111). The applicant is proposing to replace the existing metal siding to match the existing metal siding with dark green, large profile, horizontal metal siding . Staff has a concern with the choice of materials used for the exterior for the building. Metal siding is considered an unacceptable material in this design overlay district. Staff suggests that the applicant provide additional information regarding how much of the existing siding will remain compared to how much of the existing siding will be replaced. If a significant amount of the existing siding will be replaces, staff suggests that the proposed material being altered to comply with his criterion. 1. The applicant should provide additional information regarding how much of the existing siding will remain compared to how much of the existing siding will be replaced. If a significant amount of the existing siding will be replaces, staff suggests that the proposed material being altered to comply with his criterion. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. The applicant is proposing to use dark green on all of the proposed materials. In addition, the applicant is proposing to paint all existing material, except for brick and glass, dark green, so that the buildings will comply with this criterion. 2. The color of all proposed and existing material, except for brick and glass, shall be dark green. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floors fagade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity, however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. The applicant is proposing to replace all existing doors and windows with dark green metal clad frames. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are Design Review Application DR-04-09 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Page 3 of 5 discouraged. The roofs of the buildings are not being changed through the proposed project (0 Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns_ New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. The orientation of the subject building is not being altered through the proposed project. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. In Design District 1, the provision of a covered pedestrian promenade along Market Street is required in order to protect pedestrians from inclement weather and promote walking. Any pedestrian canopy, or portion thereof, that is proposed to be located within or encroach into the public R_ O. W. shall meet the specifications identified in the City Center Streetscape Guidelines. An applicant may elect to incorporate a covered pedestrian promenade as a component of the building and completely on the applicant's property, provided the promenade is at least 10 feet high and 8 feet deep. The Development Review Board may waive the requirement for a covered pedestrian promenade or canopy on a building or portion thereof if the Development Review Board finds that the block on which the building is located is adequately covered by other existing promenades/canopies. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following site design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.02 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Landscape and plantings. Significant trees and vegetation should be preserved in its natural state insofar as practicable. Any grade changes should be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas. Landscape plantings and amenities shall be well designed with appropriate variations and shall be included as an integral enhancement of the site and, where needed, for screening purposes_ In particular, parking Design Review Application DR-04-09 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Page 4 of 5 areas shall be well screened by berms, plantings, or other screening methods to minimize their visual impact. Planting islands shall be used to break up larger expanses of paved parking areas. The landscaping plan appears to be adequate. The details of the landscaping plan and budget will be addressed at the Development Review Board level. (b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street, existing or planned Such features shall be incorporated within or designed as part of the building on the site, not added as an afterthought. HVAC equipment should not be pad mounted at grade. Utility connections shall be installed underground and utilities shall co- exist to the greatest extent possible. The applicant is proposing two (2) A/C compressors on the north side of the buildings. Staff feels that the location of the A/C compressors is adequate, but that the applicant should submit details on the screening. 3. The applicant should submit details on the screening of the A/C compressors (c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a building and its surroundings. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (d) Accessible open space. When providing open space on a site, it shall be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street_ Open space should add to the visual amenities of the vicinity by maximizing its visibility for persons passing by or overlooking the site from neighboring properties. If open space is intended for active use, it should include such elements as benches, shade trees, and refuse containers and be so designed to maximize its accessibility for all individuals, including the disabled, and encourage social interaction. The siting of open space on a lot shall also consider the potential impact of buildings, both existing and potential, on shadow casting and solar access. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. With respect to vehicular and pedestrian circulation, special attention shall be given to the location and number of access points to public streets and sidewalks, to the separation of vehicles and pedestrians, to the arrangement of parking areas and to service and loading areas, and to the location of accessible routes and ramps for the disabled. Site design shall also provide for interconnections, both vehicular and pedestrian, between adjacent properties. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. Design Review Application DR-04-09 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive Page 5 of 5 (9 Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to be both aesthetically pleasing and functional. The lighting type shall be metal halide, compact fluorescent, and/or induction lamps, and shall be of a white color (e.g., CRI 70 or greater). Light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded to preclude glare and overall illumination levels should be evenly distributed. The applicant is proposing to change all of the exterior lighting on the buildings. The proposed lighting fixtures are not in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. 4. The applicant shall submit exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. (g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks, and to provisions for snow and ice removal from circulation areas. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. Such streetscape improvements shall be in accord with the specifications contained in the City Center Streetscape Design Guidelines. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application Civil & Structural Engineers � Richard S. DeWolfe, PE D��/ � Christopher J. Temple, PE ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Nathan M. Phillips, PE September 18, 2004 Pat Malone Surveying Statewide Distributing 122 Gallison Hill Road Permitting Montpelier, VT 05602 Site Design Subject: Information for Development Review Board Subdivisions 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vt. Timber Design Dear Pat: Expert Testimony The following information will be required for the Development Review Board Site Development to grant you site plan approval. Act 250 Permitting Traffic Analysis Forensic Engineering Research of the existing permit shows that there are currently 73.7 peak hour Environmental Permitting trips permitted for this site. The project as currently proposed would produce Transportation Engineering 40.1 peak hour trips according to Ray Belair's calculation. Therefore, I recommend you request the board to bank the remaining trips, 33.6, for other Structural Inspection Services uses since tenants for the retail space are yet to be defined. Commercial Building Design Shared Parking Analysis Construction Oversight Attached is a spread sheet detailing the shared parking for the mixed uses Building Assessment currently proposed on site. I have expanded from our original sheet to better define the weekend use when the recreational use will be highest. Pedestrian Bridges Site Plan Stream Alterations Sewer Design We have added the 7 foot easement to the City of South Burlington for Water Supply construction of the future sidewalk. We have also revised the landscaping plan to be in conformance with the city's tree scape plan. Storm Water I suggest that you file your application for preliminary and final site plan Hydrology approval concurrently since I believe we had a very comprehensive sketch Grading plan review and there are no outstanding issues between you and the city. Sincerely, '�>� 'J �� 81 River Street Richard S. DeWolfe, P.E. P.O. Box 1576Montpelier, Vermont Enclosure 05601-1576 phone: 802.223.4727 fax: 802.223.4740 i\Serverl\serverlJobfiles\04008 Burlington Bil1iards\D0GS\04008 9182004patmalone wpd www.dirtsteel.com San Remo Drive do not meet the setback requirements. Section 1.6022 of the Central District Zoning Ordinance prohibits parking spaces within 100 feet of the Dorset Street r.o.w. and within 87 feet of the San Remo Drive r.o.w. 6. Floor Area Ratio: The Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) for this lot is 0.38 (maximum allowed is 0.5). This is based on 16,800 square feet of floor space on a 43,950 square foot lot. 7. Traffic: This property lies within Traffic Overlay Zone 6 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 49 P.M. peak hour vehicle trip ends (vte's). I.T.E. estimates the existing approved uses to generate 47.4 vte's and the existing and proposed uses to generate 73.7 vte's. Pursuant to Section 17.50 of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if it determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. In the past the Planning Commission has granted credits for traffic due to the Dorset Street improvements for other properties along Dorset Street. 8. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $75 which is not being meta Additional landscaping was planted along Dorset Street as part of the billiard use and the area along San Remo Drive is adequately landscaped. Staff did not recommend additional landscaping. 9. Parking The existing and: proposed, uses require . 4.3 : parking - spaces by standard and only 32 spaces, including two (2) handicapped spaces, are being provided. This is an 11 space or 26% shortfall. The applicant has submitted parking count information for the billiard sales and rental use for the months of October through April. This information indicates that the peak parking demand for the use is after 7:00 P.M. on weekdays and after 2:00 P.M. on weekends. On weekdays, the retail and storage uses are closed by 5:00 P.M. and the only uses open Saturday afternoon is the billiard use and Optional Extras:. Based on the information submitted adequate parking will be available given the off-peak nature of the billiard use. Sewer: No additional allocation needed. 11. Dumpster: All dumpsters will be stored on the north side of the building. This area will be screened from. San Remo Drive and Dorset Street by a stockade fence. 12. Lighting: No additional lighting proposed. Current exterior lighting consists of three (3) 500 watt halogen lights on the side of the building near the billiard entrance and dual 200 watt flood lamps on the Dorset Street side of the building. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone\sketch. doc All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). he plans do not depict any dumpsters on the subject property. 13. The plans should be revised to clearly depict and label all dumpsters on the subject PUD, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. Landscaping The landscaping for the proposed project will have to be in compliance with Sections 13.06(F) and 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations. 14. The applicant should submit a landscape plan and budget in compliance with Sections 13.06(F) and 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations with the preliminary plat application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The proposed snow storage area is depicted on the plans. Arc b�A i According to the ITE Manual, 71h Edition, the indoor recreational facility (LU: 437) is estimated to generate 3.54 vte per 1,000 square feet in the P.M. peak -hour. Thus, the proposed indoor recreation facility is ,estimated to generate 18.4 vte in the P.M. peak -hour. The retail business (LU: 814) is estimated to generate 2.71 vte per 1,000 square feet in the P.M. peak -hour. Thus, the proposed retail business is estimated to generate 21.7 vte in the P.M. Peak -hour. The property is therefore estimated to generate 40.1 vte in the P.M. peak -hour. 15. The applicant will be required to pay the applicable traffic impact fees for the difference in trip ends between the what the subject property is currently approved for and the 40.1 vte that the proposed project is estimated to generate, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Other The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated August 12, 2004 (attached). 16. The plans should be revised to comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his comments dated August 12, 2004, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. 17. The applicant should submit a property boundary survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor with the preliminary plat application. This survey should include all existing easements on the property. The floor area ratio (F.A. R.) for this property will be 0.3. The maximum allowed in the CD2 Zoning District is 0.5. Patrick Malone Prepared by: Richard S. DeWolfe, P.E. Shared Parking Analysis DeWolfe Engineering Associates, Inc. 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 18-Sep-04 Building Use Size Occupancy Peak Parking Weekday Morning Weekday Lunch Weekday Afternoon (10-11am) (12-2 pm) (3-4 pm) 1000 SF Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Retail 8 n/a 5 40 0.7 28 0.85 34 - 0.8 32 Amusement 5.2 60 3/space 20 0 0 0.4 8 0.4 8 Total Spaces Required 60 28 42 40 Weekday Evening Weekday Late Night Weekday Early Morning (7-9 pm) (9pm-2 am) (2am-9am) Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces 0.8 32 0 0 0 0 0.5 10 0.5 10 0 0 Total Spaces Required 42 10 0 Building Use Size Occupancy Peak Parking Saturday Midday Saturday Saturday Saturday (12-2 pm) (2-4 pm) (6-8 pm) (8pm-2am) 1000 SF Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Retail 8 n/a 5 40 1 40 0.8 32 0.5 20 0 0 Amusement 5.2 60 3/space 20 0.4 8 0.6 12 1 20 0.75 15 Total Spaces Required 60 48 44 40 15 Sunday Midday Sunday Sunday Sunday (12-2 am) (2-4 pm) (6-8 pm) (8pm-2am) Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces 0.9 36 0.8 32 0.3 12 0 0 0.4 8 0.5 10 0.8 16 0.5 10 Total Spaces Required 44 42 28 10 oN 1Y J Z_ (n J O m Z = O 0). Z O Q(-D Lnw _c 1n O �r m O SPF HELD 0 1 I I I /IRS r SEE NOTE 2 N 110'44'56' E 13 x 1e EASEMENT 23.30' I 1 La i ' W L- rM c) 1— O 2 Li of Q Z OI UI I / SEE NOTE 4 I r GFD\MALONE4.DWG S 87 34'07- 1 STORY BLDG, 0 = 00'15'13' R = 22967.32' L = 101.70' N/F CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY, INC, BOOK 216 PAGES 1-3 05/15/86 GAS LINE SEE NOTE 2 N 11'05'53' E o ,- - 125' X 175' LOT - BOOK 353 PAGES 39-41 BIT. CDNC, PAVEMENT PKNS BIT. CDNC, PAVEMENT LEGEND: _._--.- -. _... _._......_ . PROPERTY LINE —0— CHAINUNK. FENCE - CENTERLINE OF ROAD p DRAINAGE LINE G GAS PIPELINE O SPF STEEL PIN FOUND o CMF CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND e IRS IRON ROD SET o PKNS P.K. NAIL SET CALCULATED POINT COMBINATION POLE oIR S 14' X 175' LDT BOOK 353 PAGES 45-48 �;=?e'S4T0T E _o-------- IRS .. -...... ------------ ti ! C? � oar 125' X 175' LOT BIT. CONC. BOOK 353 PAGES 45-48 PAVEMENT 1 If _____ _ ! 3 f i� I� AREA = 1,02 ACRES± J N 78 54 07, W BIT. CON(. PAVEMENT 336.31' W W le ce Y W Y a IL z It N/F RANDALL G. MUNSON a C/O SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY CO. BOOK 219 PAGE 63 SEE NOTE 7 LIGHT POLE GRAPHIC SCALE 0 CATCH BASIN 70 0 15 30 60 120 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 fL IN, �(7- 10'APPLE G (� 12'MAPLE SIGN y^•7 i i IRS Ld Q L1 z Q PROPOSED 7' WIDE STRIP OF e'AIA( g LAND TO BE CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON TO ACCOMMODATE A FUTURE SIDEWALK. El m 1 J 4 vi 89 J CL11 srrE , LOCATION MAP WILLISTON SCALE 1" = 4000'± GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OWNED BY PATRICK MALONE AND THE DEED IS RECORDED IN BOOK 666 PAGE 681 DATED MAY 11, 2004. 2, THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS TO N.E.T. 5 T. RECORDED IN BOOK 304 PAGES 469-473 DATED 10/16/90, PERMISSION FOR UTILITY RELOCATION TO N.E.T. 4 T. AND GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 304 PAGE 477 DATED 10/16/90. EASEMENT FOR GAS PIPELINE TO VERMONT GAS SYSTEM, INC. IN DEED BOOK. 277 PAGE 100 3. THE EASTERLY LIMITS OF DORSET STREET WERE TAKEN FROM PROJ, M-EGC NO. 5200 (8) SHEETS 44, 45 AND 46. STEEL PINS FOUND 300' NORTH OF SUBJECT PROPERTIES NORTHWEST CORNER WAS HELD AS WAS THE CONSTRUCTION CENTERLINE AS ESTABLISHED BY SAID DORSET STREET PROJECT. STEEL PINS FOUND 350', 450' AND 550' SOUTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WERE ALSO USED TO ESTABLISH THE LIMITS OF DORSET STREET. A STRIP OF LAND WAS TAKEN FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 125' LONG BY 17.5' WIDE ON THE NORTH END AND 20' WIDE ON THE SOUTH END. (PARCEL 13) SEE DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 293 PAGE 316 DATED 5/11/90. 4. A CONCRETE NAIL WAS FOUND AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND WAS REPLACED IN THE SAME LOCATION WITH A P,K, NAIL SINCE ONLY THE SHANK WAS REMAINING. THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A CONCRETE MONUMENT WHICH HAS BEEN PARTIALLY DESTROYED. ITS LOCATION WAS HELD TO RECREATE THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 5, ACCESS OFF DORSET STREET FOR THE SOUTHERLY LAND OWNER (RANDALL MUNSON) IS WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND WHICH IS 35' WIDE BY 170' LONG THIS EASEMENT IS RECORDED IN BOOK 623 PAGES 225-227 DATED 01/05/1990. 6. LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, STORAGE TANKS, SEWER, WATER AND DRAINAGE LINES WERE NOT DETERMIN-cD FROM THIS SURVEY, 7. THE RANDALL G. MUNSON PROPERTY WAS SURVEYED BY VAUGHN C. BUTTON ENTITLED 'PLAT SHOWING SURVEY IF PROPERTY OF RANDALL MUNSON D/B/A/ SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY COMPANY 364, 366 AND 368 DORSET ST. AND 65 SAN REMO DR. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT' DATED 11/03/99. THE ONLY MONUMENT FOUND WHICH WAS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WAS THE CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WHICH WAS HELD. e. CULVERT RIGHTS IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ALONG DORSET STREET RECORDED IN BOOK 293 PAGE 316 DATED 05/11/90. BEARINGS REFERENCED TO MAGNETIC NORTH 2O04. THIS PLAT CONFORMS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1403 OF TITLE 27 V.S.A. SURVEY OF LAND OWNED BY PATRICK MAL❑NE #358 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGT❑N, VERM❑NT GREG❑RY F, DUB❑IS L,S, BERLIN VERM❑NT I PROJECT # SCALE DATE REVISED 12/06/2004 ADDED 7' STRIP ALONG SAN REMO DR. 2004 - 01 1' = 30' SEPT, 2004 I CITY OF SOUTH BLTRLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 3, 2004 Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Malone: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, December 7, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, 1'-� NF��� Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. THDAYS ! classified@sevendaysvt.com arch TA AND TOBACCO NEEDED for UVM udy! We need people jokers of both tobacco ana. This is not a study. Must be at Least A. Compensation up AL 847-7897. All calls pation confidential. are LIFANT DEVELOP - TER: New childcare ated on Shelburne/ 'ngton line, has open - ants 6 weeks - 2 e. For information, 864-7835 or email is@aoLcom. cress opps KLY INCOME possible es letters from home. portunity to work illness company. ovided. No selling. 1-708-536-7040, 24 P.CardonaConsul (AAN CAN) 1st -year income i. Home -based. No MLM! Call 1-877- 24 hrs. Training and vided. (AAN CAN) rO SHOP! Mystery ceded to pose as cus- ining provided. now! 1-800-690- CAN) -24T JOBS: Earn $12 - 1vaiL. w/full med- benefits and paid clerical, administra- iforcement, homeland Ldlife, more! 1-800- axt. 2012. (AAN CAN) [ONAL or national exposure? Advertise o-filL positions in 100 newspapers just e and reach up to 17 ng, active, educated to www.aancan.com Classified Network at 55. (AAN CAN). ing money for some- mtrol your future as rf your own success- e. The Entrepreneur's ie answer. Call Pat 6-450-0077. 3 found CE. Women's Special - sent it to: C/o: Maria, PO Box 87, Plainfield, VT 05667. Payment wilt be in a a compli- mentary copy of the book. Please include name and address. CASH NOW FOR structured set- ttements, annuities and insurance payouts. 800-794-7310.J.G. Wentworth means cash now for structured settlements. (AAN CAN) CRAZY MAMAS INDOOR FLEA MARKET: Exit 21 off I-89, Swanton, VT. Thanksgiving week- end: $1 for each of the first 50 people, each day! Open Friday - Sunday, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. 802- 868-9177. Shoppers welcome, vendors wanted. INDOOR TAG SALE TO BENEFIT THE LIVER DONOR FUND! 11/27, 11 a.m. - 5 p.m. The Inn at Essex Morrill Ballroom. Items include books, movies, clothing, home goods, records, furniture, etc. PREGNANT? Considering adop- tion? We can help! We specialize in matching families with birth mothers nationwide. Toll free, 24 hours a day 866-921-0565. One True Gift Adoptions. (AAN CAN) ► entertainment CASTING:TV series seeks people struggling with painful addic- tions, especially danger, video games, steroids, promiscuity, plastic surgery. Also seeking troubled teens, desperate house- wives and groupies. www.habit stv.com. (AAN CAN) EXOTICA DANCERS featuring girls going wild for your next birthday, bachelor party or fun - on -one show. 802-658-1464. New talent welcome. MOVIE EXTRAS: Earn up to $200-$600/day. Have fun as a movie extra. ALl looks, types and ages needed. TV, music videos, commercials, films and print. Extras on call. 1-800-260-3949, ext 3001. (AAN CAN). ► professional SVCS. FULL CHARGE BOOKKEEPER: A/P, A/R, payroll, Quickbooks; etc. 16 years, experience. Call Lisa, 802-759-2078 or email rowell@madriver.com. NEED YOUR CAR IN FLORIDA? Very experienced driver, twice already this year, 30 times in 27 years. Can meet your schedule. Call Tom, 482-2894. PC SOLUTIONS offers virus/spy- COMPUTER REPAIRS AND UPGRADES: PCs, Macs, network- ing, web design, tutoring, digi- tal graphics and audio editing. Competitive rates. Many refer- ences. House calls and in -shop. Free quote, 864-7470 or in- housecomp@verizon.net. ► cleaning secs. ANNIE'S HOUSECLEANING SERVICE: Low rates. Third cleaning, 2 hours, free. Senior citizen discount. 2 drawings per month for 2 hours free cleaning for regular customers. 796-3296 or 578-4572. BRING THE SPARKLE BACK IN TO YOUR EVERYDAY LIFE. Call "Big Boss" Brager and "the gold crown kid." Eco-friendly. Specializing in top -to -bottom, whole house cleanings. 862- 9431. ► photography FEMALE MODELS WANTED for various G-rated projects. Free portfolio pictures, experience, possible start in the business. David Russell Photography, 862- 1172 or rusWp@juno.com or visit www.rusLdp.com. ► tutoring EXPERIENCED PRIVATE TUTOR AVAIL for math and science, from elementary to high school. WILL travel. Free consultation. 868-5029. ► buy this stuff BOLTON VALLEY SEASON PASSES: A buying group is being formed to purchase season pass- es at a reduced rate. Save up to $100 off the current prices. Contact Eric Caswell, 434-8635 or cazfish53@yahoo.com. Mention "Group Buying" to join this group. Deadline, 11/22. EARTH-LITE MASSAGE TABLE: Avalon, portable massage table, sage -green. Comes w/head cra- dle and black carrying -case and strap. Great condition, great deal: $400. Call 229-5996. FOUR LIKE -NEW NOKIAN HAKAPELITTA snow tires w/new rims, 185/70 R14. Cost $450. Asking $325/OBO. Hotly, and repair. Experienced luthiers. Paul Perley Cellos, in business since 1988. 802-229-1501, pperleycellos@aoLcom. FULL-SIZE VIOLIN: Lovely tone, beautiful condition, with rectangular case. Kun and digital tuner. $450. 660-9826. ► music services CD MANUFACTURING: Give us a call and see why over 200 of New England's top musicians trust us with their CD manufac- turing. Great prices and excellent service! Call Charles Eller Studios at 802-425-3508. COSMIC HILL RECORDING: MIDI and production services. Years of experience in writing, playing, recording and produc- tion. Dedicated to making your music sound great. $25 per hour. 496-3166. Moretown, VT. QUESTION MARK PRODUC- TIONS: Audio engineering/pro- duction, live sound, recording. 802-578-9356. ► musicians wanted BASS PLAYER WANTED for ready -to -gig band. Local. Stone Temple Pilots, Three Doors Down and more. Contact Cory or Chris, 288-1528. BASS PLAYER WANTED for ShelLhouse. Mostly original + covers in the Tom Petty, Dire Straits vein. Call Jim, 999-9611 or Bob, 877-2084. BASS PLAYER WANTED to fill out a six -piece '60s R & B, soul and downtown jumps bar music band. Looking for an easy-going, get -along sort of person whose number one musical interest is to have a great time. Call Steve, 879-9661 or Tim, 951-5927 for audition. DRUMMER WANTED for local band working on original music and playing out. We are looking ahead and want a drummer that wilt do the same, keep a beat and make rehearsals. Call 598- 9188, no half steppin. JAZZ MUSICIANS WANTED: Local bassist looking to form a small bebop group to do origi- nals and standards. Looking for piano and drums, yet open to others. Call Chris, 893-6645. LOOKING FOR MUSICIANS to form a band with a play list sim- ilar to that of WOKO (country). Call 373-4164. ► legals PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, December 7, 2004, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Preliminary plat application #SD-04-79 and final plat appli- cation #SD-04-80 of Patrick Malone to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 16,800 sq ft building with multi- ple uses. The amendment con- sists of: 1) razing a 3600 sq ft portion of the building thereby creating two (2) separate build- ings, 2) converting the 8000 sq ft building at 358 Dorset Street to retail, and 3) converting the 5200 sq ft building at 55 San Remo Drive to indoor recreation. 2. Final plat application #SD-04- 76 of Barbara Neff to subdivide a 17.09 acre parcel into two (2) Lots of 0.92 acres (Lot A) and 16.17 acres (lot B), 700 Hinesburg Road. 3. Preliminary plat application #SD-04-77 and final plat appli- cation #SD-04-78 of Michael GraveLin, dba A & M Construction Corp., for a planned unit devel- opment to convert a 2142 sq ft single family dwelling to Day Care and/or General Office use, 1060 Hinesburg Road. 4. Appeal #AO-04-02 of Karen Atence appealing the decision of the Administrative Officer to issue zoning permit #ZP-04-391 for a single family dwelling at 11 Lyons Avenue. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board November 17, 2004 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. In re: R.K. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH EURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 17, 2004 South Burlington Realty PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, �01 Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH URLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERiV ONT 05403 (802) 546-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 17, 2004 Champlain Oil Co. PO Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy Mconoug h Administrative Assistant Encl. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 5, 2004 Pat Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Malone: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, November 9, 2004 at 7.30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy Mc ough Administrative Assistant Encl. 5 G U T N • �5 pJ U 4Z T N e��Nwot+,5�[�GIt�TCswc . sU2. (�G2.96's3 ' J buG 04 No Text S G U i N �} G� Gt T N 6r.A1.,+pit.�woA:��C)GIA't'i"Swc . arn,�2,9c33 27 Auc a4 ' REMOVE & RELOCATE EXISTING PLANTINGS DOWNCAST LIGHTS TYPICAL OF (4) W y ti ti 0.1 " I k ! .- �a +:• ate., .... I Story M11") - 1 4 OWNER & APPUCANT' PATRICK MALONE MALONE PROPERTIES 122 GALUSON HILL ROAD MONTPE IER, VT 05602 LOT AREA = 44,564 SF = 1.02 ACRES EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 17, 244 SF = 38.7% COVERAGE PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 13.200 SF = 29.6% COVERAGE FRONT YARD = 2500 SF DORSET STREET 928 SFIMPV. = 37.1 X FRONT YARD = 875 SF SAN REMO DRIVE 536 SF IMPV. = 65.8 X ZONING DISTRICT. CENTRAL DISTRICT 2 OVERLAY DESIGN DISTRICT 2 EXISTING GREEN AREA = 8656 SF = 19.4X EXISTING PAVED AREA = 18664 SF = 41.9% PROPOSED GREEN AREA = 7710 SF = 17.3% PROPOSED PAVED AREA = 19602 SF = 44.0% PARKING SPACES = 48 t 2 HC = 50 SPACES Nl" CHAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY INC. .-- acunvc cncnur rein N/F MUNSON AMA �ouAN "UNGTON REALLY CO, PROJECT SITE lk V I. + ' South R � 1 ..i d- s k# _ { h: Z 0 a, I s r W DUMPSTER, CRUSHED STONE PAD, AND U Ella: - STOCKADE FENCE — — — — APPROKIOATc PROi'ERTY ONE J� Bhi. Co:.c. Pn•enznt 8 SPACES i?V C� .. NEW 3' LOCUST -J REMOVE ;i,IE -u ---�-- n-m- CHAIPILIHK FENC`. Ira uNE ----i02_--_ E.(;ST,NG GROUND COtdiO ;t S _ ___ SEWER 'JNE D-- G�.A!NAmC U.`iE O 19011 ROD FOUND - BENT / NAIL -0(IND s 06 $ i {} GDueu+Ara+; IDLE I DOWNCAST LIGHTS _ t , CrtOJPIJ UGn'15 t _ TYPICAL OF (4) BIKE RACK i� `y - RELOCATE (2) PJM ❑ CATCH BASIN I R`10DODENDRON 0 a• DARE 0ECIOU0i3S TREE W OWNER SHALL REPLACE BIRCH LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE: r. WITH 3'-3.5* CHANTICLEER AJ CALLERY PEAR, PYRUS CALLERYANA D - -KELSEYS COMPACT' DOGWOOD (11) 'CHANTICLEER' AFTER CONSTRUCTION H s HOLLY -BLUE PRINCESS- (2) I 0� OF NEW MUNICIPAL SIDEWALK BY OTHERS BLUE PRINCE' (1) ,J it K - 'KNOCKOUT ROSE- (13) P - POTENTILLA-GOLDFINGER- (7) PG - PEE -GEE DWARF HYDRANGEA (1) R : RHODO. "PJM ELITE? (9) y' W a WOCELA -WANE & ROSES- (5) i SbRVEYOR'S NOTES - I ^�S1. 'H FP,IS i;i NOT A PROPtRTY SURVEY: A?F' r"AATE PK^F•ERTY LDJES SnOWN r1 ARE BAS"0 Uu A OISiUR9EJ (SENT) iRDN ROD FOUND :ALONE SAN RE,Ai; RUED. 1tAILS WERE ViJUND k CNC DORSET STREET BUT DID NO"� R.wTGH TiiE D=EDED s I ONIACT_ OF' !P5 FEET. 2.CATIUN UI- UNRGRC!IND UT1LI^E^, vERE a;?? DETE£RINED. lhVEi:TS DF DRAIAiAGE LINES WITHIN THE CATC4 BA£TIA TD BE CHECKED AT A. ' AT:"R t "E I..'+_-ATLON CF UNDERC4 Wkil SEWER, VATER, SPA:NACx. GAS i-NJ OTHER is �a UTRiTY LINES TO, BE BETER41NF_L PRIOR TO ANY Si?E WLIRK. S. TEE UTILITY BOXES IN FRGNT rr� INE BO LDItA; ALONG L7RSLT STREET ARE SUDJ_CT' TC AN EASEMENT TEt�I;•=i N P:;uNTAIN "RIVER AY.E NEW EI15LA4D TLLE-H{ NE A:gig TELEGRAPH. Tii S EASEMENT IS T5' WIDE :EAST-WFS"i) All!)13' I WIDE (NMRTH-SOUTH). G!HFR EAS'-SELITS GN THIS PRUPERIY MAT EXiiT SOT DEED vm IU I• AND PLAT: ESFr.RC.H GN THIS PRUPERTY AtiD ABVTTORS WAS NOT BrNE. `l V 4. TIE VERTICAL .AI v4 WAS ASSUMED AS NX,A"' (BL11L`J1NO FLCI..,i2; GRAPHIC SCALE (INFm) 1 1Rch . IAA IL r O 1I_ LJ > /W W � H z O W �Ir W W \ V) O W O � J W W W F---I 0 O U m a- F- W t--t Ld = of z O Q O SHEET DFsaaP(nH PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROJECT NO. MTE 04008 16 SEP 2004 U C1.02 W/RSD OET7(m sllF[T 1 OF 1 �r ■l .i M (2) = = 0017 = = —"]1i NW410 LM M00ZMnI<__!'0MM IRIEW = = i '"nw r 'q8W VVW = WALL-LITE SERIES SPECIFICATIONS APPLICATION: The Wall-Lite series is a durable, compact light source with a contemporary design which'' compliments any architectural decor. These units provide excellent lighting for walks, parking lots, tuneis,'ramps, auto dealership sales lots and for general safety and security lighting. LAMP CHOICES: Metal Halide, Super Metal Halide, Mercury Vapor or High Pressure Sodium lamps in the horizontal position. HOUSING: The fixture"housing Is die-cast aluminum available In three sizes: Small, Medium and Large. Each unit is supplied with e, 1/2" .14 N€P.S.-thmAdpd cnndultantriara nn tha tnr nnri`hnth- : , - J/.0 a.J. vau//uu/ N II11/J 11 IJ . Ia YI VIIG FYCJICI. IAVWUWI .l Ual. REFLECTOR: The hammertone reflector is formed from premium alloy aluminum, it is then highly polished and anodized for maximum luminaire efficiency. LENS: Heat and shock resistant prismatic boroscillicate glass gives low brightness and wide-angle light distribution. DOOR FRAME: Die-cast aluminum with integrally held captive stainless steel screws. Sealed with a heat resistant gasket. BALLAST: The Wall-Lite incorporates a high power factor C.W.A. , or a high power factor lead elcuit type dependent upon required lamp. An optional N.P.F. reactor ballast Is'availabla nn soma POLYCARBONATE SHIELD STEEL WIRE GUARD CATALOG LAMP LAlyl%' SERIES WATTS TYPE...., RN . 120 ACCESSORIES, ror ,; PC-C-120 PHOTOCELL FOR 120 VOLT UNITS 100 HP RH PC-C-208-277 PHOTOCELL FOR 208-277 VOLT UNITS 150 S PC-C-480 PHOTOCELL FOR 480 VOLT UNITS XH WLS CWA SF SINGLE FUSING FOR 120 OR 277 VOLT DF DOUBLE FUSING FOR 208,240 OR 480 VOLT 100 MH XH TS-WL TAMPER -PROOF SCREWS 175 MH CWA 120 WL-LL-LM POLYCARBONATE VANDAL SHIELD FOR SMH 208 240 DBP LARGE AND MEDIUM UNITS WL-LL-S POLYCARBONATE VANDAL SHIELD FOR HPS WLM 250 MH CWA 277 SMALL UNITS SMH 480 MT GWL-LM STEEL WIRE GUARD FOR LARGE AND MEDIUM UNITS HPS GWL-S STEEL WIRE GUARD FOR SMALL UNITS WLL 400 MH CWA SMH NO POLYCARBONATE SHIELD AND WIRE GUARD CANNOT BE COMBINED ON THE SAME UNIT. APPLIES TO ALL SIZES. l ITA SHEET -WALL-CITE SERIES SMALL WALL -CITE MEDIUM WALL-LITE man a e■ nnnmnuoon■n �,r ■nn■nnnnouut� i■■■■■m■om■nnn .nn■■■■■n■■n■■nt■f !on WEEK: 000rj e■r nn■o/uunor r ■n■n■■on■un■r In'minimnrir:imiu'/'r:iriauindll ■ G. 6 3/4 r--- 7 V2 4 9 r■t■■■■■■■■■■.■■.■■■■.■■.■■.■.■■■r r■■.........■....■. Now ■■■■■■■■■■■r Iunnnnnn0000ueu/uu■ unnnununnnnouuuu iiii••no nowt, 0o■�■■uouoonnnnnunn.. '8 1/2-14 NP.S. CONDUIT ENTRY WITH fi @ THREADED ADED CAPS ON TOP AND SIDES REINFORCED MOUNTING HUBS WITH CENTER CLEARANCE FOR V4" BOLTS REINFORCED HOLE PATTERNS FOR 1/2-14 NP.S. CONDUIT ENTRY WITH 4" BOX MOUNTING HOLES ON 3-1/2" AND BOLT CIRCLES FOR I10 SCREWS THREADED CAPS ON TOP AND SIDES 7 3/4 AND ND 1 AV2" CENTER WIRE HOLE REINFORCED HOLE PATTERNS FOR 4" BOX MOUNTING HOLES ON 3-1/2" AND REINFORCED MOUNTING HIES WITH 2-3/4" BOLT CIRCLES FOR #10 SCREWS CENTER CLEARANCE FOR 114" BOLTS _ AND 112" CENTER WIRE HOLE - o _011n J 15 V4 LARGE WALL-LLIE_W1TH_ ACKBAY 11 718 T- 5 112 0 1 MH 2MH 3MH 4MH 5MH 6MH V214 NP.S, CONDUIT ENTRY WITH THREADED CAPS TWO ON TOP AND BACK ONE ON EACH SIDE REINFORCED MOUNTING HUBS WITH CENTER CLEARANCE FOR 1/4" BOLTS x Cl) x N N x 0 x r- x N x M LISTED for Wet Locations qII GSA Certified � BALLAST ENGINEERING DATAJ4iLLY A LAMP TYPE LAMP WATTS R-HPF R-NPF CWA OR HX-HPF INPUT WATTS 120V 120V 120V 208V 240V 277V 480V MAXIMUM OPERATING CURRENT IN AMPERES 100 1.05 2.10 1.15 0.67 0.58 0.50 0.29 115-1_38� HIGH 150 1.50 3.20 1.65 0.95 0.83 0.72 0.42 170-190_ PRESSURE SODIUM 250 2.75 1.60 1.38 1.20 0.69 300 400 4.00 2.30 2.00 1.75 1.00 465 100 - -_ 1.15 0.66 0.58 - - 125 METAL 150 1.80 1.04 0.90 _0.50 0.78 0.45' _ 210 HALIDE 250 2.50 1.44 1.25 1.08 0.62 292 400 4.00 2.30 2.00 1.75 1.00 455 1 )0 1.05 0.60 0.52 0.45 0.26 - 118 MERCURY 150 1.75 1.00 0.87 0.76 0.44 200 VAPOR 250 2.60 1.45 1.25 1.10 0.62 _ 285 400 - 3.90 2,20 1,95 1.70 0.98 454 ISOLUX DIAGRAM (FOOTCANDLES) FOR MEDIUM WALL LITE WITH 250 WATT CLEAR METAL HALIDE LAMP. 20,500 LUMEN RATING. OTHER PHOTOMETRIC DATA IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. CONSULT SPERO APPLICATIONS DEPT. Mounting Height Foot Carldl® Values 'For The Following Curve A B C D E' F G H 8' 62.5 31.3 12.5 6.3 3.1 1.3 .63 .27 10, 40 20 8.0 4.0 2.0 .80 .40 .21 12' 27.8 13.9 5.6 2.8 4.1 .56 .28 .15 14' 20.4 10.2 4.1 2.0 1.0 .41 .20 .11 - 16' - 15.6 7.8 3.1 1.6 .78 .31 .16 .09 18, 12.3 6.2 2.5 1.2 .62 .25 .12 .07 20' 10.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 .50 .20 .10 .05 22' 8.3 4.1 1.7 .83 .41 .17 .08 .04 24' 7.0 3.5 1.4 .69 .35 .14 .07 .035 26' 5.9 3.0 1.2 .59 .30 .12 .06 .031 28' 5.1 2.6 1.0 .51 .26 .10 .05 .029 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON' DEPARTMENT OFPLANNING NING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 14, 2004 Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Malone: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the August 17, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bets Yao-nough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 AUGUST 2004 The lot has about 60 trees over 6 inches in girth. They would take out "suppressed" trees (those under the canopy). The canopy won't be changed by what they do. Mr. Bolton was concerned with setting a precedent. Mr. Griffin noted most of the neighbors have clear cut their trees. Mr. Kupferman asked if they are tearing down the house. Mr. Griffin said they will keep the foundation. Mr. Belair felt the plan will not adversely affect anyone's views of the lake and that what is proposed is very minor. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Application #CU-04-07 of Robert & Susan Griffin subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Qe Sketch plan application #SD-04-54 of Patrick Malone for a planned unit velopment for a project consisting of: 1) removing a 3600 sq. ft. section in the center of the building to create two separate buildings, 2) developing the 358 Dorset Street building with 8000 sq. ft. of retail space, and 3) developing the 55 San Remo Drive building with 5200 sq. ft. of indoor recreation use: Mr. DeWolf said the project goes from Dorset St. back to San Remo Drive. They are asking for a 4 parking space waiver and feel this is justified because the peaks of the 2 uses are not the same. This is a 17% reduction request. There will be a new sidewalk along the face of the building. They will also add landscaping and update exterior lighting. There will be a new dumpster enclosure. Ms. Quimby asked about timing for dumpster servicing. She noted there is a lot of noise at 5 a.m. when dumpsters are emptied. Mr. Belair said that since this is adjacent to a residential neighborhood, there are noise performance standards that must be met. Mr. DeWolf said they will address that. A third handicapped parking space will be added. mom DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 AUGUST 2004 Regarding the easement to Champlain Oil that staff is requesting, Mr DeWolf noted there is not a natural connection today. They can pursue this if the Board wishes. Mr. Belair said staff wants the option to connect the properties if the opportunity arises in the future, and will seek an easement from both properties. Ms. Kupersmith asked about the possibility of the retail business being open late so it would affect the shared parking situation. Mr. Belair said that will be part of the analysis. The applicant must show there won't be a conflict. Mr. DeWolf said they are also asking for a waiver on front yard coverage. There is no change from what is there now. Meeting the requirement would result in the loss of another parking space. They propose to maintain a larger green area and will relocate some plants from the front to that area. Mr. Belair said a sidewalk would be very desirable unless there are physical limitations. Mr. Kupferman said he wouldn't favor that if it limited parking. Mr. Jaeger noted there is an easement of 7 feet granted to the city by Munson. The applicant asked that preliminary and final plats be combined. Members felt the applicant would be taking a risk because of the parking, sidewalk and landscaping issues. Mr. Belair noted the applicant had asked to remove a front door which staff opposes. The applicant indicated they are OK with keeping it. Mr. Bolton asked for pictures to show where snow will be stored on the property. 9. Miscellaneous application #MS-04-02 of Maynard Auto Supply to: 1) alter existing grade behind building, and 2) encroach into a Class II wetland buffer, 1725 Williston Rd: Mr. Collins reviewed the history of the request. He noted that fill was illegally brought onto the site. The State became involved, and the applicant has being doing what the State required. They are reducing the graveled area and adding plantings. Cathy O'Brien was consulted for recommendations and she approves of the plantings. Ms. Quimby asked if the applicant will get the floodlights into compliance. Mr. Belair said the applicant has to be willing to do this. -7- 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 EORSET .STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (302) 846-4106 EA'(802) 846-4101 August 13, 2004 Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Re: 358 Dorset Street & 55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Malone: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, August 17, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: August 5, 2004 \drb\sub\malone\sketch.doc Plans received: July 16, 2004 358 DORSET STREET & 55 SAN REMO DRIVE SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-04-54 Agenda # Meeting date: August 17, 2004 Owner/Applicant Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 Engineer Property Information DeWolfe Engineering Associates, Inc. Tax Parcel 0570-00358-C PO Box 1576 Volume 666, Pages 681-684 Montpelier, VT 05601-1576 Central District 2 (CD2) 1.02 acres Patrick Malone, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review of a planned unit development for a project consisting of: 1) removing a 3,600 sq. ft. section in the center of the existing building to create two (2) separate buildings, 2) developing the 358 Dorset Street building with 8,000 sq. ft. of retail space, and 3) developing the 55 San Remo Drive building with 5,200 sq. ft. of indoor recreation use. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on July 16, 2004 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS The proposed project is in compliance with most of the dimensional standards for the CD2 Zoning District. The lot size, setbacks, and overall coverage will remain unchanged. The building coverage will be reduced from 38.7% to 29.6%, which is under the 40% allowed in the CD2 Zoning District. The only issue is the front yard coverages of the subject property. The front yard coverage on Dorset Street is 37.1 % and the front yard coverage for San Remo Drive is 65.8%. Both of these are above the 30% allowed for commercial properties in the City. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the proposed Land Development Regulations PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. 1. The South Burlington Water Department should review the plans prior to final approval. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone\sketch.doc 2. If needed, the applicant must obtain final wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hoover, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 3. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The subject property is currently served by an 18' wide curb -cut off of San Remo Drive and a 26' wide curb -cut off of Dorset Street. Neither of these curb -cuts will change as a result of the proposed project. Circulation on the site should be adequate. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. There are no wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, or unique natural features on the subject property. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels the proposed project is in conformance with the stated purpose of the Central District, as outlined in Section 8.01 of the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Open space requirements are not applicable to the proposed project. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. 4. The Fire Chief should review the project prior to final approval. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The proposed project will not affect the extension of utilities and infrastructure to adjacent properties. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing sidewalk and entrance along Dorset Street. Staff does not recommend that the Development Review Board allow the applicant to remove this sidewalk or entrance, as it is important to maintain a presence of this building along the public street. An excerpt from Section 8.01 of the Land Development Regulations, which states the purpose of the Central CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone\sketch.doc Districts, encourages "the traditional town center pattern of appropriately scaled buildings facing onto a well-defined and active public street." Staff does not feel this site can accomplish this goal if the front entrance and sidewalk are removed. 5. The plans should be revised to replace the front entrance and sidewalk, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. 6.. Exterior lighting details for the building, in accordance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations, should be submitted with the preliminary plat application. 7. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed project is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Indoor recreation facilities and retail services are permitted uses in the CD2 Zoning District. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The proposed project will remove the center portion of the existing building on the subject property. Staff does not feel that this modification will not have a significant affect on the relationship between structure and the site, the relationship between structure and structure, planting areas, or pedestrian movement. Pursuant to Table 13-1 of the Land Development Regulations, the indoor recreation facility will require 0.33 parking spaces per person in maximum occupancy permitted. The applicant has stated that 5,200 square feet of building space will be devoted to an indoor recreation facility use, but did not indicate how many people would be permitted at maximum occupancy. Pursuant to Table 13-1 of the Land Development Regulations, the retail business use will require 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). The applicant is proposing to dedicate 8,000 square feet to retail business use, and therefore would require forty (40) parking spaces. The site currently provides fifty-two (52) parking spaces, which means that twelve (12) could be devoted to the indoor recreation facility use. Thus, the current site plan could accommodate a maximum capacity of thirty-six (36) persons for the indoor recreation facility. 8. The applicant should submit information regarding the proposed maximum capacity of the indoor recreation facility use with the preliminary plat application. 9. Pursuant to Section 13.01(G) (5) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans should be revised to depict a bicycle rack, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. 10. The plans should be revised to depict three (3) handicapped -accessible parking spaces, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone\sketch.doc Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The existing parking is located along the side of the existing building. The proposed parking will be behind the two (2) proposed buildings, relative to the public streets. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The proposed project will not result in any changes to the height of the existing structure. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The subject lot is within the City Center Design Review Overlay District 2. Thus, the South Burlington Design Review Committee shall review the proposed project. 11. The applicant shall submit a Design Review Committee application with the preliminary plat application. 12. The applicant shall submit proposed building elevation plans and design details with the preliminary plat application and the Design Review Committee application. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The subject lot is within the City Center Design Review Overlay District 2. Thus, the South Burlington Design Review Committee shall review the proposed project to determine the project's compliance with this criterion. In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff suggests that the Development Review Board and the applicant assess the possibility of establishing access easement to facilitate a future connection between the subject property and the property to the north. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. CiTY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone\sketch.doc All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not depict any dumpsters on the subject property. 13. The plans should be revised to clearly depict and label all dumpsters on the subject PUD, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. Landscaping The landscaping for the proposed project will have to be in compliance with Sections 13.06(F) and 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations. 14. The applicant should submit a landscape plan and budget in compliance with Sections 13.06(F) and 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations with the preliminary plat application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The proposed snow storage area is depicted on the plans. Traffic According to the ITE Manual, 71h Edition, the indoor recreational facility (LU: 437) is estimated to generate 3.54 vte per 1,000 square feet in the P.M. peak -hour. Thus, the proposed indoor recreation facility is estimated to generate 18.4 vte in the P.M. peak -hour. The retail business (LU: 814) is estimated to generate 2.71 vte per 1,000 square feet in the P.M. peak -hour. Thus, the proposed retail business is estimated to generate 21.7 vte in the P.M. Peak -hour. The property is therefore estimated to generate 40.1 vte in the P.M. peak -hour. 15. The applicant will be required to pay the applicable traffic impact fees for the difference in trip ends between the what the subject property is currently approved for and the 40.1 vte that the proposed project is estimated to generate, prior to issuance of a zoning permit - Other The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated August 12, 2004 (attached). 16. The plans should be revised to comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his comments dated August 12, 2004, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. 17. The applicant should submit a property boundary survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor with the preliminary plat application_ This survey should include all existing easements on the property. The floor area ratio (F.A. R.) for this property will be 0.3. The maximum allowed in the CD2 Zoning District is 0.5. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\malone\sketch.doc RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document prior to submitting a preliminary plat application. Respectfully submitted, Brian Rob ' son, Associate Planner Copy to: Patrick Malone t RECEIVED JUL 16 2004 "�/:" City of So. Burlington !-sEE yp;E N� CFIAMPLAIN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1� REMOVE EXISTING GATE REPAIR FENCE /t !"�— RETAIL SPACE ?]- �%TTTjj�. ; f I I''s'ti�,,,a� CAKE 5100 SF � aX ( o°" WD! D-... • RUSH 1 STORY 3k.Du: SNOW STORAGE AREA,.. RF?AOVE am a ic" 'a, ! EXISTING BUILDING r RETAIL SPACE REMOVE ENTRANCE 2900 SF CONSTRUCT �� +' AND SIDEWALK NEW F� r-!' PA; 'Jt1LiT' PARKING C� U SPAS / LTASIN PROPOSED ^/``�%f TI 7 �✓ ,, N 650 _" = 9850 PHAN SPORTS, INC. blWARD CLUB 5200 SF ,JJ 18 SPACES '! BIT. CONC. PAVFMEN'i C .. MD �.. •"�.�' � r I! ! so :'d R ALL �j ! I 1 STORY i1lDG• Bi"". CQQN!'. PAVEMENT ! p N 4 OBA SOUMUNSON T11 RURLINCTON REALTY CO. OWNER do APPLICANT- PATRICK MALONE 122 GALI_ISON HILL ROAD MONTPEUER, VT 05602 LOT AREA = 44,564 SF = 1.02 ACRES EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 17, 244 SF = 38.7% COVERAGE PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 13.200 SF = 29.6% COVERAGE FRONT YARD = 2500 SF DORSET STREET 928 SF IMPV. = 37.1 % FRONT YARD = 875 SF SAN REMO DRIVE 536 SF IMPV. 65.8 % ZONING DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT 2 OVERLAY DESIGN DISTRICT 2 EXISTING GREEN AREA = 8656 SF = 19.4% EXISTING PAVED AREA = 18664 SF = 41.9% PROPOSED GREEN AREA = 7710 SF = 17.3% PROPOSED PAVED AREA = 19602 SF = 44.0% U J 6 SPA blT '.:.:M.C. 1 P..EMew; ' IT- CCNr_. FAV!'MEL+T 771 !l► /may � 6 0.'Y:. CUfB 0.t 1 13� PROJECT SI TE r;. 1 br~q 7 n e� j L! nI �) 7 ! 11 i s• ! 1 ! SW Rik Ic3.Y o% � fir _ . j'� . • ,, � A � � South by —., Cem I S W. APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LIRE --o—u--c—o -,:— CHA!NLINK `E\IC.F. ..._...._. _. _....._.._ APPROX. CENIPIRLINE LA J`i� 11 J TREC L'NE -----102----- EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR .--- S.--- SEER L IN' —'---D--_.--' DRAINAGE LINE O IRON RW FOUND - BENT ♦ NAh F,wND - COMB!NAI:ON POLE j 0R.')UN9 LICH TS y LICHT POLE SEWER ;dA"iFiDL G- CATCi BASIN G' IC MAFfs. CECIDUOUS TREE SFNEREI_ NFITES I. THIS IS %,ar A PRQPEWP: SL,R'VEi. APP�uxIMATE PROPERTY LINES SHOVN APE BASED ON A DISTURDEE 4ENT) IROtI RPP FOUND ALO11Ti SAN RENC RUA!i. ItA'7_S `WERE f'-KiNr ALtIKG PC;RSrT STREET BUT ^ID NOT 14ATCm THL DEEDED FRGNTAGE DF 125 FEET, 2. ,3CATION OF UNDERGROUND UTI_!TIES VERE NOT D='TERMINED: iN'✓ERIS Df CRNmAGE LINES 'WITHIN THE CAT!'.M E.^---'.NS TO BE CHE('XF_D AT A L!,TER DATC. THE I.CCATii1N C- UNDERGROUND SEWER, WATER, DRAINAGE, GAS AND (ITHER UTli.,TY LINES TII RE DETER#!;NED �RTCR TO ANY SITE WORK. 3 74E I;TD.iTY BOXES IN F'ROr" OF TKT BUILDING ALONG DORSET STREET ARE 5U-A.:rCT TG AN EASEMENT TG GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER AND NEW F.':�G AND ''ELEPHDNE AND TELEiPAPH, �HiS E-SEMENT IS i5' WIDE ia.ASI-WES-T', AND 13, WIDE (NORTH -SOUTH) O'HER EASEMENTS ON THIS PROPERI"i MAY EXIST BUT DEED AN") PLAN RESEARCH ON "4iS-ROPERTY AND ABUt'TURS WAS NOT DOTE. 4. THC VERTICAL DATU4 WAS ASSUMED AS k0000' (BUILDING F"LGDR) GRAPHIC SCALE (INrmI I h-20 ft -4� �n Jun 29 04 04:19p Marcel Beaudin 8028s20289 G�� 2 CITY OF SOUTH B�JRLINGTOI°alT �Gry, � RG DEPARTMENT OF P>t.AI%iNUgG & ZONUgG � 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 � Permit Number SD- ay - S APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in. the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shownSon deed, mailing address, phone and fax patric-k Malone, 122 Gal 1 i son Hi 1 1 Rd— Mnnfpi-I i Ar 1Z.T-0-9 02 --. --- — Office 802-223-9954, Fax 8Q2-22.9-9009, CP1 1 802-793-01 79 _ 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) volume 666^pages 681 -68_4-. ;) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Fee simple 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 358 Dorset :St. & 55 San Remo Drive 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) Map 25 Lot 16 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use)Billard/Recreation 5-UO sQ_ ft _.IWarPhol,GP-Storage600 sq- ft /Retail 8000 sq, ft _ b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Rec; rea ion 5200sctft /_Retail 8000 s r ft --- — c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Proposed 13,200; Existing 16.800 Jun 29 04 04:19p Marcel Beaudin 8028620283 p•3 d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) same - varies e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) N / A ^_ 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % bj Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing_ % Proposed _% 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) Rigbt of way over Dorset St. portion to abutter. 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Addition of storm drainage 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) See attached site plan 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE o h / 2 o o , 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. Jun 29 04 04:19p Marcel Beaudin 8028620283 p.4 I hereby certify that all the information requested as pa)of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNAfiURE,.OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 7 �P I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: VCompl;Di ❑ Incomplete o Planning & Zoning or Designee bate DRAFT MOTION OF DENIAL PHILIP KILEY - DESIGN REVIEW 9/7/99 I move the South Burlington Development Review Board deny the design review application of Philip Kiley to install a 16 square foot wall sign and a 2.5 square foot wall sign on a building used for a tavern and indoor recreation use, retail, and storage, 358 Dorset Street, as depicted on a five (5) page set of plans, page one entitled ""TGARS (The Game and Recreational Store)" and dated received 7/20/99, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed sign design does not comply with Section 4(a) of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The proposed sign design is not consistent and compatible with other signs on the property. The color of the proposed signs, font style and material are inconsistent with the color, font and material used on the freestanding sign serving the property. 2. The proposed sign design does not comply with Section 4(c) of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The proposed bright yellow color and white background of the 2.5 square foot sign is incompatible with the red brick facade upon which it is proposed to be connected. Kennedy Drive and Williston Road intersection, there will be an increase in the safety level of this intersection. 5. The reduction of Mobil Oils' front yard coverage by 6% represents the minimum variance possible that will afford relief. Dennis Johnson asked if this street complies with City specs. Patrick O'Brien replied yes. Dennis Johnson asked if this driveway is going to be private or deeded to the City. Pat-r-ick O'Brien rep.lied private. The appeal was granted unanimously. Appeal 115 Philip Kiley and Stephen Whittlesey Appeal of Philip Kiley and Stephen Whittlesey seeking approval from Section 19.65 Multiple uses and Section 1.20 Conditional uses. Request is for permission to operate a restaurant/lounge (capacity 20 seats) in conjunction with an existing retail use d.b.a. Burlington Billiards, located at 358 Dorset Street. Mr. Ward informed the Board the area is zoned Central District 2. Section 1.101 Permitted use, retail (see letter dated April 29, 1992). Section 1.20 Conditional uses, sub section 1.201 Restaurants, walk-in and sit down, sub section 1.205 Taverns. Section 19.65 Multiple use, (Conditional use Section 19.05). Existing use billiard parlor/pro shop, retail use. Proposed use restaurant/lounge (capacity 20 seats), snack bar and beverages. Mr. Kiley is requesting from the City Council a First Class liquor license to handle draft wines and beers. Philip Kiley addressed the conditional criteria as follows: a. There will be no change int he capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. b. The essential character of the neighborhood will not be changed. C. The traffic on the roads and highways will not change. d. The bylaws will not be affected. e. Utilization of renewable energy resources - none. Dan King asked if anyone has called him about this proposal. Mr. Kiley replied no. Maureen O'Brien stated that when he first came to the Board this is why she voted against it. C.1 Dennis Johnson agreed that it now becomes a pool hall instead of a r billiard parlor. Maureen O'Brien asked if he knows how many kids use his parlor. Mr. Kiley replied less than 5%. Maureen O'Brien asked about the number of kids after school. Mr. Kiley replied none other than the principal and his son. Mr. Kiley stated that he has lost 40 to 50% of his business to Cherry Street Bill iards@tn-d needs to h44Le.- the liquor L-icense in -- order to stay competitive. Dan King stated he feels very uncomfortable with its location and feels that it is an impact in that area and it effects the character of that area. Joseph Randazzo stated he remembered that this was going to be a retail use with a larger percentage from sales of pool tables. He doesn't see that a restaurant and lounge is a further extension of a retail use. Mr. Kiley replied that 54% comes from sales of pool tables and it remains a retail use. Mr. Kiley stated that Cherry Street Billiards charges $10 an hour and he charges $3 an hour. After much discussion, Stephen Kramer suggested that the Board should consider serving alcohol after 8:00 p.m. when children would not be there. He would be able to sell for four hours a night from 8:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. Mr. Kiley stated he appreciates their concern and would agree with this proposal because it will not impact his business. The average age is over 18 years old and 75% of them are over 21. Dennis Johnson made a stipulation that should this appeal be approved the hours of operation for sale of beer and wine will only be between the hours of 8.00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. and they will have a review within six months before the Zoning Board. This was seconded by Stephen Kramer and the stipulation passed 5 to 2. The appeal was granted 5 to 2 as stipulated. Extension of Rice -Cathedral High School Dick Ward stated that Ron Stankevich wants a six-month extension regarding the Zoning Board's approval of a proposed soccer -lacrosse field. They were not able to build the field and would like to build it this spring. They would like a six-month extension to June of 1994. If he doesn't do it between now and then, then he would have to come back before the Board. 7 Mr. Richard Ward July 7, 1994 Zoning Administrative Officer South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment Dear Mr. Ward: I am writing to you and the zoning board relative to the stipulation place on me Philip Kiley d/b/a Burlington Billiards at the appeal hearing dated December 13, 1993. A part of that stipulation called for a review by the zoning board within six months of that hearing date. This stipulation has caused me some degree of financial hardship and a significant increase in Dram Law liability. I would like to see this stipulation removed in its entirety. Please advise if a hearing is necessary and if so at what date. Respectfully Yours, PRc4 0 Phili' Kiley Burlington Billiards �lLLIAR�� Complete Pro -Shop Sales & Service 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 660-8989 No Text I ��fr TGARS - (THE GAME AND RECREATIONAL ST0RE),,`,' �/��rte �6y�; Ker,�ut� �r�� � RECEIVcCi JUL 2' 6 Ir-j- City of So. Burlington 30" %Y:lIiS 12'° CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 20, 1999 Philip Kiley Burlington Billiards 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Wall Signs, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Kiley: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesdays City Center Design Review Committee meeting and my comments to Committee. Please be sure someone is at the meeting on Monday, August 23, 1999. If you have any questions, please call. in erely, 9 � at Joe V�.,eith, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 5, 1999 Philip Kiley Burlington Billiards 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Wall Sign - 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Kiley: Enclosed is a copy of the August 23, 1999 City Center Design Review Committee minutes on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. �1Sinc rely, , I V A) Joe Weith, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 3, 1999 Philip Kiley Burlington Billiards 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Wall Sign, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Kiley: Enclosed is the agenda and my comments to the Development Review Board. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 7, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymon J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AUGUST 23, 1999 The South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee held a meeting on Monday, August 23, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall conference room, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: Mary Benoit, David Boehm, Frank Clark, Donna Leban, Bonnie Pelky. Also Present: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning; Philip Kiley, John Kennedy, Katy Lesser, John Jaeger, and a representative of The Bon Ton, Inc. 1) Minutes of July 20, 1999 The minutes of July 20, 1999 were approved unanimously. 2) Continue design review application of Philip Kiley to install a 16 square foot wall sign and a 2.5 square foot wall sign on a building used for a tavern and indoor recreation use, retail, and storage, 358 Dorset Street. Mr. Kiley explained that he decided not to change his proposed sign design because the design is already printed on his business letterhead and is already on the internet. The committee reconfirmed their earlier concern with the proposed color of the sign and how it would relate to the color of the building and other signs on the property. They were particularly concerned with the proposed yellow highlighted lettering on a white background and how the smaller sign would look mounted on a brick facade. Ms. Leban moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend denial of the design review application of Philip Kiley to install a 16 square foot wall sign and a 2.5 square foot wall sign on a building used for a tavern and indoor recreation use, retail, and storage. 358 Dorset Street as depicted on a five (5) page set of plans, page one entitled "TGARS (The Game and Recreational Store)" and dated received 7/20/99, for the following reasons: 1 The proposed sign design does not comply with Section 4(a) of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance The proposed sign design is not consistent and compatible with other signs on the property. The color of the proposed signs and font style are inconsistent with the color and font used on the freestanding sign serving the property. 2 The proposed sign design does not comply with Section 4(c) of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance The proposed bright yellow color and white background of the 2.5 square foot sign is incompatible with the red brick facade upon which it is proposed to be connected. Ms. Benoit seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 3) Design review application of John Kennedy to modify the design of an approved 32 square foot freestanding sign, 340 Dorset Street Mr. Kennedy presented the application. He said the main change between the previously approved sign and the proposed sign is that the proposed sign will be constructed with metal Memorandum - Development Review Board September 7, 1999 agenda items September 3, 1999 Traffic: ITE estimates that the change in use will result in 0.67 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 9) PHILIP KILEY - WALL SIGNS - 358 DORSET STREET - DESIGN REVIEW This application involves the installation of a 16 square foot wall sign and a 2.5 square foot wall sign at 358 Dorset Street. Both signs are for a new business called TGARS (see enclosed renderings). Each sign will consist of red lettering highlighted in yellow and mounted on a white board. This application was reviewed by the City Center Design Review Committee on 7/20 and 8/23/99 (see enclosed minutes). The Committee expressed concern with the proposed color of the sign and how it would relate to the color of the building and other signs on the property. The Committee was particularly concerned with the proposed yellow highlighted lettering on a white background and how the smaller sign would look mounted on a red brick facade. The committee also expressed concern that the design and color of the two (2) signs was inconsistent with the design of other signs on the property, in particular, the freestanding sign along Dorset Street. The Design Review Committee recommends denial of this application (see 8/23/99 meeting minutes). The reasons for the Committee's recommendation include the following: 1. The proposed sign design does not comply with Section 4(a) of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The proposed sign design is not consistent and compatible with other signs on the property. The color of the proposed signs, font style and material are inconsistent with the color, font and material used on the freestanding sign serving the property. 2. The proposed sign design does not comply with Section 4(c) of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The proposed bright yellow color and white background of the 2.5 square foot sign is incompatible with the red brick facade upon which it is proposed to be connected. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): ❑ Design Plan Approval 1 I Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) The Stephen M. Whittlesev Revocable Trust Sole trustee - David Whittlesev 148 Garden Street Cambridge, MA 02i38 Tel: (617) 497-5284 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 'Philip Kiley 358 Dorset Street, So. Burlington, VT Tel: 660-8989 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Philip Kiley h60-8989 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 358B Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 6) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2 5 - 01-16 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. Add sign, see attached. The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. "- ,4IGNATURL7/'OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF LAND/BUILDING OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (ApformDR) EXHIBIT A DESIGN REVIEW The information listed below must be submitted along with an application for design review. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission. Design Plan Approval • One or more current photographs of the property showing the present condition. • A site plan of the property in accordance with Section 26.10 of the Zoning Regulations. • Building elevations, drawn to scale, showing all sides of the building including: • architectural details • exterior equipment located on the roof, walls, and ground • building height • existing and proposed grading • color, type and texture of building material • doors • siding cornices • entablatures • roofing material • moldings and trim • window details including panes of glass, dimensions, shutters, lintels and awnings Sign Design Approval • Plans (drawn to scale) and specifications showing the size, dimensions and color of the sign and its various parts, the style of letter, material of which the sign is to be constructed, and method of attachment to the building or in the ground. • Color sketch of the sign and building as they would appear in relation to each other. • Statement as to method of illumination and intensity of the sign. • Master signage plan containing the following: • an accurate site plan of the property showing the location of buildings, parking lots, driveways and landscaped areas. • computations of the maximum area, number, and height of signs, by sign type (i.e., freestanding, wall, etc.), allowed on the property under the sign ordinance. • computations of the area and height of each sign on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. • an accurate indication on the site plan of the proposed location of all signs on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. J L{a'l. vJ f 1'J'77 L't'9: nGr'!'! I"4 The infomnation listed on Exhibit A attached shall be subn'titted along with this application farm. Five (5) regular size cosies and one reduced ropy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., s,ite plan, building elevations. sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that a!i> the inforr aty n requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Gf�ATURE APPLICANT l " ICNATUR oVLAND/SUILDIN �ER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this design review appiieation and find it io be: 11 Complete 0 Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee pate (ApformDR) "t� V ='�L5-6 V L i. Id05�tI1 _;.:. 5`315i11 I HA ; JC d --. J ICIE i i. t GE-1 i. -90-9 DRAFT MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL PHILIP KILEY 7/20/99 I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application of Philip Kiley to install a 16 square foot wall sign and a 2.5 square foot wall sign on a building used for a tavern and indoor recreation use, retail, and storage, 358 Dorset Street, as depicted on a five (5) page set of plans, page one entitled "TGARS (The Game and Recreational Store)" and dated "received" 7/20/99, with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation to approve is for compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The decision of whether or not the proposed sign complies with all other standards contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. 2. r dt2co� e 44 Aze o� 74 -ra' .e #1 rn,. z 51dwee .I DRA 8/23/99 / MOTION TO RECOMMEND DENIAL PHIL KILEY - TGARS I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend denial of the design review application of Philip Kiley to install a 16 square foot wall sign and a 2.5 square foot wall sign on a building used for a tavern and indoor recreation use, retail, and storage, 358 Dorset Street, as depicted on a five (5) page set of plans, page one entitled "TGARS (The Game and Recreational Store)" and dated received 7/20/99, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed sign design does not comply with Section 4(a) of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The proposed sign design is not consistent and compatible with other signs on the property. The color of the proposed signs and font style are inconsistent with the color and font used on the freestanding sign serving the property. 2. The proposed sign design does not comply with Section 4(c) of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The proposed bright yellow color and white background of the 2.5 square foot sign is incompatible with the red brick facade upon which it is proposed to be connected. (Kiley) MEMORANDUM To: City Center Design Review Committee From: Joe Weith, Director, Planning & Zoning Subject: August 23, 1999 Agenda Items Date: August 18, 1999 AGENDA, ITEM #2 - PHILIP KILEY - WALL SIGNS - 358 DORSET STREET This application involves the installation of a 16 square foot wall sign and a 2.5 square foot wall sign at 358 Dorset Street. Both signs are for a new business called TGARS (see enclosed renderings). This application was continued to this meeting in order to give the applicant time to work with staff to propose a sign design that better addresses concerns expressed by the Design Review Committee. The Committee has expressed concern with the proposed color of the sign and how it would relate to the color of the building and other signs on the property. The Committee was particularly concerned with the proposed yellow highlighted lettering on a white background and how the smaller sign would look mounted on a, brick facade. The applicant has decided to not change the proposed design of the signs. He has not yet decided whether he will withdraw his application or if he will just go on to the Development Review Board with a negative recommendation from the Design Review Committee. If a letter of withdrawal is not received by Tuesday night, I recommend that the Committee make a recommendation to either approve or deny the application. AGENDA ITEM #3 - JOHN KENNEDY - MODIFY FREESTANDING SIGN - 340 DORSET STREET This application involves revising the design of an approved 32 square foot freestanding sign located at 340 Dorset Street (formerly Burlington Rent -All). The current sign design was approved by the Planning Commission on 6/8/99 and is shown on the enclosed drawing entitled "Sign B". The approved sign is 12' high and consists of a 6" x 6" pressure treated posts and border. The signs panels appear to be white with the exception of the address panel which would be a darker color. The sign would be illuminated by exterior lights. The proposed sign is T' and would consist of metal posts and metal border. The metal posts and border would be painted the same dark green as the metal roof on the building. Sign panels are white with the exception of one red "Coca Cola" sign. The sign will be externally lit as originally proposed. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 26, 1999 Philip Kiley Burlington Billiards 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Wall Sign, 358 Dorset Street. Dear Mr. Kiley: Enclosed is a copy of the July 20, 1999 City Center Design Review Committee meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Joe With, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl 1-111�lj !11 -- 49 1 . *.:�, VERMONT STATE POCKETS BILLIARDS ASSOCIATION KILEY, PhiliplWHITTESSEY, Steve 358 Dorset Street Area zoned Central District II. Section 1.101 Permitted uses, retail uses that include but not limited to pharmacy, delicatessen or convenience grocery, etc. Commercial I District, Section 11.20 Conditional uses, sub section 11.202 indoor recreational facility. Proposed use retail pro -shop and billiard parlor. Administrator's opinion, use is considered as an indoor recreational facility. Appeal is based on fact that 51% of revenue is retail sales. CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE JULY 20, 1999 sheets of all exterior lighting on the building to the Director of Planning & Zoning. The light fixture on the southwest comer of the building shall be removed or replaced with a downcasting shielded fixture The type of replacement fixtures shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. 2 Prior to review by the Planning Commission the photo exhibits shall be revised to show the following changes: a) The proposed new windows shall be consistent in design and of the same color as the doors and windows on the south side of the building. b) The door and door frame along Dorset Street shall be painted a similar color as the stone facing on the building. c) The shutters on the front of the building shall be removed. ) The screen lattice to the left of the pizza restaurant entrance on the north side of the building shall be painted to blend in with the stone siding. Ms. Benoit seconded the motion.. The motion passed unanimously. 5) Design review application of Philip Kiley to install a 16 square foot wall sign and a 2.5 square foot wall sign on a building used for a tavern and indoor recreation use, retail, and storage, 358 Dorset Street. Mr. Kiley presented the application_ The committee expressed concern with the proposed color of the sign and how it would relate to the color of the building and other signs on the property. They were particularly concerned with the proposed yellow highlighted lettering on a white background and how the smaller sign would look mounted on a brick facade. The committee encouraged the applicant to consider a design that is more consistent with freestanding sign on the property (e.g., color and letter font). Ms Benoit made a motion to continue this application to the August 23 1999 meeting in order to give the applicant time to work with staff to propose a sign design that better addresses the concerns expressed by the Design Review Committee. Mr. Clark seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 6) Other Business Next meeting is scheduled for August 23 at 7:30 P.M. Clerk 3 Q i j GRASS* 1 N I I I 9MW it harn�i. pa gg 13'x20' 9 x18 9 x18 9 x18'D'x18 D'x18 D x18 4'x18'D,118'D x18 D x18 I vi?9 KI qX/� 9xiF `�X i aini PAVED RetWaling PAVED PAVED I M D Pa I I GRASS I � � � CURBING_��_—�_—/�—_—l�"--1�--�-----%�---/�---�---�---�---�---f�---/�---/,�---%`---/�---/,�----/,�----�----%,�--�---/�--/�---�----�-_— _ OWNER SUPPLIED INFORMATION w vr DENSE YEWS 18' TO 24" DENSE YEWS 18' TO 24" v - -- cn U � way—lra�xa PJM RHODO FLM i� "-�„� ►.m. t RED MAPLE SOM174 SAND iHILL ROAD PAC. = PACHYSANDRA 174 SAND HILL ROAD �J RECHVEU ESSEX �UNCnON, yr MUNSON PROPERTY 9'X22' 9'X22' D'X22' D'X22' 9'X22' D'X22' J A N 2 s 1994 City of So. Burlington . • I I I l . / • • I I . 1 I . I I / I . . . I I I . • I I . i . i • . . . . I . , . , I I I . . I S. �-W �rEcsE day CP" 9, �-� -�Fy I*T _d:,!tliRJCS'AN4;4'.IfA`I'::n�- January 6, :,.tli1s 358 Dorset St./55 San Remo Dr. USF _ qt IZEL,, AND P,RKxNG E3 IIMATFS, USE SIZE PARKING SPACES Da t ev_;;.�� :,axiington Billiards 51100 sf 10 Tavern 720 sf (22 seats) 12 Billiard Tables Electrical supply 21900 sf 6 �+ Retail 300 sf Office 150 sf Storage 2,450 sf a lain oil Co. 31600 sf. 0 Storage 3,600 sf ,;.vtional Extras 51200 sf Retail 1,500 sf 8 - 10 Office 900 sf 5 Storage 2,500 sf Utility 300 sf TOTAL'PARRING SPACES: 31 ._. I a --1 H _7 �J C_ T e, H -r - —7 - o— .}., r _ T :=-1 -d i` ._-. ! — V4 " 1` D IS REAM f AV FAX TRANSMXSSION of pages to follow:1 Company: Company: � L� i - 3�_ge : Rowe,, TO FAX aV44 ,a do riot receive all pages please call us immediate-v 302-878-9000 E)avis Fax #: 879-0553 0 P.O. Box 220, Rte. 2A 0 Williston, Vermont 05495 • 0 " d 10, 1 -I " ::3 -A S I e%. " CE ' -1 ' f' !2 5RI- : :D I :A A -t- C-- — L — t4 " 1 Re. Parking at Burlington Billiards Jan. 18, 1994 South Burlington Planning Comm.: The following parking matrix is based on observations during the past year. The number of cars parking are the average for the months of October through April. These quantities are progressively reduced in the summer months. _______W.._______________________...___________________ Mon. Tue. Wed. Thur. Fri. Sat. Sun. 12 : 00pm _________________-_w______________________..______-__ ; 3 ; 4 ; 3 ; 4 ; 4 ; 6 ; 5 ; 1:00 --------------------------------------------------- ; 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 15 ; 12 ; 2,00 --------------------------------------------------- ; 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 20 ; 25 ; 3:00 ; ..._____..______W.._______________________w.______________ 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 25 ; 25 ; 4:00 ; --------------------------------------------------- 8 ; 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 25 ; 20 5.00 i --------------------------------------------------- 6 i 6 i 6 i 6 i 6 ; 15 i 10 ; 6"00 ; _______-..______..M________________________...w._____...___-_ 5 ; 10 5 ; 5 ; 5 ; 10 ; 8 ; 7.00 ; _________...__-___......__- 8 ; 20 ; -______________,.-___-________....__ 10 ; 10 ; 10 ; 12 ; 15 ; 8,00 ; --------------------------------------------------- 10 ; 20 ; 10 ; 12 ; 12 ; 15 ; 20 ; 9.00 ; 15 ; 20 ; 15 ; 15 ; 20 ; 25 ; 25 ; 10=00 ; --------------------------------------------------- 15 ; 20 ; 20 ; 20 ; 25 ; 25 ; 25 ; 11.00 ; ___-__-.._________________________-_..______.___________ 15 ; 20 ; 15 ; 15 ; 25 ; 25 ; 20 ; 12 00am ; --------------------------------------------------- 15 ; 15 ; 15 ; 15 ; 20 ; 20 ; 15 These quantities include employee (Three maximum) cars. The other exceptions are when tournaments are conducted. These are only held on weekends, five times per year. +Kilep t u x Yours , NSr�I Phi� �ILLIAR�� Complete Pro -Shop Sales & Service 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 660-8989 M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files /'f,,L From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, February 8, 1994 agenda items Date: January 17, 1994 STEPHEN WHITTLESEY - MULTIPLE USES - SITE PLAN -- one (1) additional handicapped space should be provided. --- the notation "shed to be removed" should be removed since this shed was removed over a year ago. Fence should also be removed from plan since it has been taken down. --- dumpster areas should be screened and so indicated on the plan. --- plan should show sidewalk and bikepath along Dorset Street. --- parking standards require a total of 43 spaces and only 32 spaces are being provided. Applicant should provide parking counts for Burlington Billiards to justify the reduced number of spaces being provided. --- the maximum number of P.M. peak hour trip ends this property can generate is 49. Staff estimates the existing and proposed uses to generate 73.7 vehicle trip ends (vte's). Pursuant to Section 17.50 the Planning Commission may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if it determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. --- plan should show concrete block wall projecting out from building into parking area. --- snow is being stored in the area indicated for parallel parking spaces, applicant must address snow storage/removal issue. PETER VAL PREDA - PARKING AREA EXPANSION - SITE PLAN --- applicant has not complied with condition of 9/24/91 approval to revise plan to show $600 in new landscaping on the south side of the entrance drive. --- provide exterior lighting details (types of lamps, wattage, pole height, etc.) for all existing and proposed exterior lighting, locations should also be shown. --- the most recent plan submitted for this property shows. that gravel has illegally been placed in the front yard. Gravel area is considered covered which results in the front yard ive(41 OIL .en subdivision regulations (Section 406) require the City to pay the difference between the cost of the improvements necessary for the subdivision and the cost of over -designing and over -building. These regulations require the City Council to approve an over - design prior to the Commission granting approval. 19. Water: Municipal water system will serve this development via a 12 inch main and will connect with the existing CWD main adjacent to the storage tank on Dorset Street. Applicant has obtained a letter from both the South Burlington Water Department and Champlain Water District indicating that the estimated demand of 113,400 gpd can be met. 20. The applicant is increasing the water demand to 116,850 gpd or a 3,450 gpd increase. A letter from the water department should be obtained for this additional demand. 21. Phasing: Project will be "market phased" and built out over a four (4) year period. The applicant estimates that 15 multi- family units and up to 45 single-family homes will be built each year. 22. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement for the multi -family units based on building costs is $52,500 which is not being met. The value of the landscaping proposed is $49,030 for a $3,470 shortfall. The applicant should makeup the shortfall by adding a few more trees to the buffer strip along the east side of lots 1-17. The value of the street trees proposed is $158,485 and the value of the two (2) trees per lot is $96,600. The total landscaping value is $307,585. 23. Archeological sites: The State Division for Historic Preservation has identified an archaeologically sensitive area on the western side of the project area. Plans do not take into account the protection of this sensitive area. Section 19.151h of the zoning regulations requires the applicant to show that this development will not have an undue adverse effect on and will protect rare and irreplaceable historic sites. The plans do not show the area of potential archeological sensitivity as reburied at preliminary plat. The applicant has indicated that this area will be shown on the plans when the location of the boundaries become available from the State Office of Historic Preservation.��i''�� 24. At the preliminary plat hearing, the Planning Commission requested that the area of potential archeological impact be shown on the drawings so that the Commission could clearly see which lots/units are involved. The Commission discussed imposing a condition which would prevent a zoning/building permit from being issued for these involved lots until the applicant can present evidence from the Division for Historic Preservation (SHPO) that the lots/units will not adversely impact archeological sites. This area should be shown on the plans. 4 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 11, 1995 Phil Kiley Burlington Billiards 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 358 Dorset Street - Parking Dear Phil: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the 2/8/94 Findings of Fact & Decision for the above referenced property. As part of the approval, the Planning Commission approved 32 parking spaces for the property which represents a waiver of eleven (11) spaces required by standard. The parking requirement by standard was calculated as follows: Burlington Billiard 12 tables x 2 spaces/table = 24 22 seat tavern = 7 Oakman Electric 300 square feet R.F.A./150 = 2 Optional Extras 1500 square feet R.F.A./150 = 10 Total 43 spaces At the meeting, you presented parking data which showed that your business was utilizing fewer spaces during the hours that Oakman Electric and Optional extras were open. Your data combined with Phil Kiley 358 Dorset Street - Parking September 11, 1995 the standards for Oakman Electric and Optional Extras revealed the following results: 3:00 P.M. Weekday 3:00 P.M. Weekend Burlington Billiards 10 25 Oakman Electric 2 0 Optional Extras 10 10 Champlain Oil 1 0 23 35 Based on the parking data you submitted, the Commission felt that the 32 spaces on the property would be adequate during average peak periods. cerel , J Weith, C y Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl PLANNING COMMISS_I.ON__ 8 February 1994 lace_ - d. The__plan�shall show the new sidewalk continuous across_ the Swift St. driveway. e. Show existin2�sidewalk along entire Shelburne Rd. fronta e f. Show location and__types_ of exterior lighting. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for installinq the sidewalk alon the Swift Street frontage. The sidewalk_ shall be installed in accordance withCit of South Burlin ton specifications. 7. The applicant -shall obtain a zoninq/buildinq permit within six months or this proval is null and void. 8. An_y charlgs tt0 the site plan shall require approval b_y the South,,, ; non Plannin Commission. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Teeson rejoined the Commission. 5. Site plan application of Stephen Whittlesey for 1) adding a 22 seat tavern to an existing retail sales & billiard table rental use (5100 sq. ft.), 2) convert 2900 sq. ft. of vacant space to retail (Oakman Electrical Supply) and 3) convert 5200 sq. ft. of vacant space to retail (Optional Extras) in a 16,800 sq. ft. building containing an existing non -conforming storage use (3600 sq. ft.) 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive: Mr. Nick said they have tried to find uses based on the new zon- ing and uses that do not have a high parking requirement. The Optional Extras use is a bead company; Champlain Oil has only a storage use, and Oakman Electric is mostly a storage use. Mr. Nick added that Burlington Billiards got a liquor license last night. Mr. Nick said the application meets density and lot coverage re- quirements. The hours of operation of the businesses help reduce parking needs. The Billiard use is open from Noon to Midnight, Champlain Oil from 7 am to 5 pm, Optional Extras from 10 am to 5 pm, and Oakman Electric from 10 am to 5 pm. A stockade fence has been added in the northeast corner. One more handicapped parking space has also been added and addi- tional snow storage on the north side of the parking. 49 peak hour trips are allowed. 73.7 will be generated. The are not proposing any traffic mitigating improvements on the site. Mr. Sheahan asked about a gate at the end of the building. Mr. Whittlesey said it is not used and is use is pretty much gone. Mr. Craig felt it important for that entrance to remain open so customers can exit to San Remo Drive to get to Dorset St. heading PLANNING COMMISSION 8 FEBRUARY 1994 page 5 south. Mr Burgess noted the plan shows no gate. If the gate is ever closed, the applicant would be in violation of the approval. Mrs. Maher expressed concern with the approval of a tavern so close to the Middle School. Mr. Weith noted it is a conditonal use. Mr. Whittlesey noted that the Zoning Board required a re- view after 6 months to see if there are any problems. The tavern will only operate between 8 pm and Midnight. Mr. Sheahan said -he could only vote for the plan if the gate is taken out. Mr. Nick said they are prepared to take it out. Members agreed this must be stipulated. Mr. Burgess said the applicant should understand that the only reason this application can be approved is because of the median. He said if the median were not there, he would not vote for the approval. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Stephen Whittlesey for: 1)___addinq a 22 seat tavern to an existinq retailsales_ and _bil_liard_ table rental use (5,1000 sq. _ ft_. ) , _ 2 ) convert 2, 900 sq. ft. of vacant space to retail (Oakman Electrical Su Iv) and 3) convert�5,200 SQ.�ft.+ of vacant space to retail (Optional Extras) in a 16,800 sg.ft. burld�ing containina an existinq nonconforming storage use (3600 sq. ft..).,_ 358 Dorset Street 55 San Remo Drive, as depicted _on a plan en- titled "358 Dorset South Burling ton VT," prepared by Somerset Associates, and dated 6/3/92, with a stamped „receiv_ed"_ date of January 28, 1994,_ with the followinq stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded bjvy this a roval shall remain in effect. 2. This site �plan approval_ shall not be construed as approval to alter a noncomplyin structure. _The decision of whether or not to a rove alteration to a noncom 1 in structure shall be made b the Administrative Of in accordance with Section 19.002 of the�Zonin Re ulations. 3. This property lies within Traffic Overlay Zone 6_ which allows__ this property to generate a maximum of 49 pm peak hour vehicle trip ends (vte's). ITE estimates the exi_st_inq approved uses to enerate 47.4 vte's and the existin and proposed uses to ener � d ate 73.7 vte's or 24.7 vte's more than is allowed. Pursuant to Sec_t_io_n_17.5_0_ of the Zoning Re ulations,_thePlanning Commission ma approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if it determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. It is the Planning Commission's o inion that the recently completed Dorset_ St. im_- provement pro'ect will produce a�net benefit in access safety to PLANNING COMMISSIO_N__ 8 FEBRUARY 1994 page 6 and from the property since turnip movements on Dorset St. will be reduced due to the median. In addition, the removal of the ate will enhance circulation and access to the site. Therefore it is the Commission's o inion that the provisions of Section 17.50_are adeguatelvmet. 4. The Planning Commission approves the reduction in the number of required parkin spaces from 43 to 32�spaces_. It is the Plan- nin Commission's opinion that due to the off-peak nature of t_he_ billiard use that adequate_parkiinq will be available. 5. Any new exterior lighting or change in existing_ ighting shall consist of downcastinq _shielded fixtures so as not to cast__light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be ap- proved by the City Planner for to installation . 6. The ap 1p icant shall obtain a zonin /bui1_ding permit within six months or this approval is null and void. 7. The applicant shall_ obtain a Certificate of Occupancyfrom the Administrative Officer 2rior to use of the new arkine_area-'- 8. Any chap e to the site plan shall require_ approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 9. As expressly represented J:�y the __applicant,_ the existin ate on the property will be removed. 10. The plan shall be revised prior to permit issuance to remove the note "yard li ht and ole." 11. As stored Mrs. Maher seconded. Motionpassed unanimously. will be 6. Site plan application of Sally Majarian to convert 2 dwelling units of a 4-unit multi-fa-nily dwelling to a'day care facility for a mximum of 20 children, 1473-1475 Williston Rd: Mr. Majarian said they would rather chain off than close the curb cut since they may want to use it again if the day care doesn't continue in business. Mr. Teeson said he couldn't see allowing the use without closing the curb cut. Mr. Hartsuff said it is his feeling that the curb cut adds to the value of the property if it is there. He suggested allowing it to be chained off rather than closing it forever. Mrs. Maher suggested allowing the applicant to chain it off for a year; if the day care is still there at that time, at should be closed permanently. Other City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 30, 1995 Burlington Billiards 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Escrow Agreement, Certificate of Deposit #01-107864 Dear Phil: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the City of South Burlington has completed a site inspection pertaining to the landscaping improvements as set forth on the approved plan dated June 3, 1992 and prepared by Somerset Associates. By means of this letter we hereby release your certificate of deposit #01-107864 held by the Bank of Vermont. Please submit a copy of this letter to the Bank of Vermont. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer RW/peh ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, in triplicate, by and between�/�Li,y�Jrp,y /iA hereinafter referred to as "Developer", the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality", and hereinafter referred to as "Bank". W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer has received final subdivision approval from the Municipality's Planning Commission for the construction and development of (number) of residential units in a development to be known as 3 s� po1;? S-, %r s rce- '/ - So, /.�l�l2Lus/ Vf�Pht�vT • as depicted on a final plat plan entitled "Legend on Final Plat" dated -J-otuz J , prepared by A516C/AT=S and and WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete certain improvements; and WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement wish to establish an escrow account to secure the obligations of the Developer as set forth in the final subdivision approval; and WHEREAS, the Bank executes this agreement solely in the capacity of escrow agent. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Developer will at its own expense complete the following improvements in connection with its development: (Description of public improvements requires; by suhd ivis ion appi:ov,, t ) 0o Clv�f�as wool 01= �4vC�SC,dp AS a(EEell?deO�/ TGt,E - Hotiotj or AA0k60,4�,4 A.�'(? Sl COO J AJ 2. Developer will convey to the Municipality by properly executed Warranty Deed, free and clear of all encumbrances, the roadways, easements and other public improvements prior to the Municipality granting any zoning permits to the developer. 3. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in paragraph one no later than G 4. The Developer shall repair or replace any faulty or defective work or improper material which may appear within year of completion. S. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all requirements hereinabove set forth, Developer and Bank agree that the sum of $(Amount set by planning commission or its designee) shall be set aside and held in escrow by the Bank and shall be available for payment to the Municipality, in accordance with the terms herein set forth. 6. If the Municipality shall file with the Bank a state- ment that Developer is in the judgement of the Municipality in sixty (60) day default under the terms of this agreement, the Bank shall from time to time pay monies from said escrow fund to the Municipality, in amounts not to exceed a total enabling the Municipality to complete the improvements and requirements set forth in this agreement. 7. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of such statement as it files with the Bank. The consent of the Developer to such payment by the Bank to the Municipality -2- shall not be required. The Bank shall incur no liability to the Developer on account of making such payment to the Municipality, nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety of any claim by the Municipality of default on the part of the Developer or into the use of such funds by the Municipality in completing such improvements. 8. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a state- ment of default until sixty (60) days after notice has been sent by it to the Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested, setting forth its intention to do so. 9. All monies released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph 6 shall be used by the Municipality solely for the purpose of performing obligations imposed upon the Developer by that portion of this agreement upon which the Developer is then in default. Any work to be performed by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the Municipality with its own work force and equipment or shall be accomplished in such manner as in the judgment of the Municipality shall accomplish the work most expeditiously and economically. 10. If monies are released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph 6 and it shall later develop that a portion of the released monies are surplus to the Municipality's needs, any such surplus shall be refunded by the Municipality to the Bank to be held and distributed by the Bank pursuant to the terms of this agreement. 11. The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such payments to the Municipality when requested by the Municipality by the appropriate statement, and Developer will not interfere with or hinder such payments by the Bank to the Municipality. Said statement shall contain a certificate of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph 8 of this agreement. 12. This agreement shall terminate and shall'be of no force or effect upon performance of all requirements contemplated hereby and the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph 4. 13. Upon request of Developer, but only at the sole discretion of the Municipality, the Municipality may release a portion of said escrow funds if the Municipality believes that the retention of said funds is not necessary to protect its interests after a portion of said work has been completed. Bank may release such funds only upon written consent of t:he Municipality. 14. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 13 the sum of $ shall be in any event maintained in escrow until certification to the Bank by the Municipality of the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph 4. 15. This agreement shall not only be binding upon the parties hereto, but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. -4- Dated this %ice day of - 4 19\�, 92— IN THE PRESENCE OF: (DEVELOPER) By: I ts Du Authori ed Agent CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Its ,D'uly Authorized Agent (BANK) '6&Nlc- OP: � ►/2.�.tvy;7 By: .cue bf"-4"rF�Ylti.. r--- -Its Duly Authorized Agen A CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT DATE WITHDRAWAL OR PENALTY DEPOSIT INTEREST BALANCE TELLER 1 3SEP9? - 2 3 4 5 6 i 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 _ 20 21 22 23 ll=n be NOTIFY THE BANK OF ANY CHANGE OF ADDRESS OR IF PASSBOOK IS LOST Bank of Vermont — CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT NUMBER 01-107864 Vt. State Pocket Billiard Assoc. Escrow A c Bank Of Vermont Escrow Agent SOCIAL SECURITY n 03-0303233 DATE 9/3/92 - ISSUED _ MATURITY DATE 3/3/93 4 1S o RATE . RENEWED TO RATE RENEWED TO RATE RENEWED TO RATE RENEWED TO RATE 2213 (5192) - CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT Non -Negotiable Not transferable except on the books of the depository institution. This certifies that the above holds a Savings Certificate in this Bank in the amount stated above, and at the rate and for the term specified. MATURITY — On the date of maturity (or within the specified grace period) the owner may withdraw all or a portion of the funds or invest the proceeds in other accounts at this bank by presentation of this certificate. If this certificate is not presented to the Bank within the specified grace period, with instructions for payment or reinvestment of the proceeds, then at the Bank's option the certificate will be automatically renewed for the same term as the original certificate, at the rate of interest then being paid by the Bank for this term if the minimum requirement is met. WITHDRAWAL PRIOR TO MATURITY — Under federal regulations and the rules of this Bank, a depositor may not withdraw all or a part of a deposit prior to maturity except with the consent of the Bank, and a penalty must be assessed on the amount withdrawn. LOANS — With the approval of the Bank, loans may be obtained upon security of certain types of Certificates of Deposit. Please inquire as to the terms of such loans and whether this certificate may be pledged as security. LAWS AND REGULATIONS — This Certificate is subject to the rules and regulations of the Bank, as amended from time to time, which are available upon request. In addition, this Certificate is subject to all applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations. BANK OF VERMONT P.O. Box 949 - Burlington, Vermont 05402-0949 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 28, 1994 Mr. Stephen Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Dumpsters, 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Whittlesey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I must again call to your attention the fact that not all of your dumpsters at the above referenced property are located in their approved location. Specifically, I am referring to a dumpster located on the south side of the building. This dumpster must be placed in the approved location with the other dumpsters. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sinc rely, Ra m�ndJ. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp �� f p r j^,' t f 3/1 - (02_ r -g� �� ,7y 1,03 71Y 417F 3 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 8, 1994 Mr. Stephen Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Dumpsters, 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Whittlesey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I must again call to your attention the fact that the dumpsters at the above referenced property are not located at their approved location. I brought this to your attention by a letter dated May 20, 1994 and gave you two (2) weeks to comply. It has now been over three (3) months since you received this letter and still this requirement is not met. You have seven (7) days from the date of this letter to bring your property into compliance with the approved site plan. Failure to do so will result in legal action by the City of South Burlington. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si4mTJ. ly, Ra Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/peh City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 20, 1994 Stephen Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Dumpsters, 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Whittlesey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is to call to your attention the fact that the dumpsters at the above referenced property are not located at their approved location. All rubbish containers are to be placed on the north side of the building in an area screened by a stockade fence. This is shown on your approved site plan. You have two (2) weeks in which to bring your property into compliance with the approved site plan. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since y, c Raym d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 April 11, 1994 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Stephen Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Violation, 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Whittlesey: Please be advised that you are in violation of Section 20.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Your violation consists of the commencement of land development without a zoning permit issued by the Administrative Officer. In addition, you have not complied with conditions #6, 7 and 9 of your February 8, 1994 Planning Commission approval. You have seven (7) days in which to correct this violation or be subject to legal action by the City of South Burlington. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc rely, R ym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Richard Ward Jeff Nick City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 16, 1994 Jeff Nick J.L. Davis Realty P.O. Box 220 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Multiple Uses, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Nick: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on February 8, 1994. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning/building permit be obtained within six (6) months of the approval date. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S;rTerelyt J JTWA eith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp State of Vermont WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. WW-4-0717 Environmental Protection Rules APPLICANT Stephen Whittlesey Effective September 10, 1982 ADDRESS 300 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of converting an existing building into a billiards rental and retail space with 12 billiards tables and a 22 seat restaurant (5100 square feet); retail space for Oakman Electrical Supply (2900 square feet) and retail space for Optional Extras (16800 square feet) located at 358 Dorset Street in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. (2) No alterations to the building that would change or affect the exterior water supply or sewage disposal, or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. (3) In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and. be subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. (4) The Vermont Department of Health is to be contacted in regard to any .regulations and/or licenses required by their Department. They may be reached at 802-863-7220). (5) The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the sewage and water, systems for public; buildings under. 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. WATER SUPPLY (6) The project is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0717, Stephen Whittl.esey Page 2 SEWAGE DISPOSAL (7) The project is approved for connection to the South Burlington Airport Parkway wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 1035 gallons of sewage per day. Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 9th day of March, 1994. Jack Long, Commissioner Department, of Environmental Conservation Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c For the Record City of South Burlington Planning Commission City of South Burlington Selectboard Water Supply Division Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Philip Kiley City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 8, 1994 Jeff Nick J.L. Davis Realty P.O. Box 220 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Multiple Uses, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Nick: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the February 8, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that you obtain a zoning/building permit within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sir rely, t Joith, Cilanner 1 Encl JW/mcp County r Licensed p Unlicensed p Pending Address 3S ?5 Person Contacted n r Subject VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TT ! Z �- ;; a-o unitarian / (A D2�Rate Time In / Time Ou t _Town Estab. �� / ✓/ I.D. No. Licensee 0 Phone No. Titles How Initiated State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Stephen WHITTLESEY 300 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Essex Jct.,Vermont 05452 Telephone # 879-6563 February 16, 1994 RE: WW-4-0717 ; Burlington Billiards ex. com. bldg. cony. to 22seat rest. and retail space <lA mun water & sewer 750 gpd located Dorset Street in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the referenced permit on 02/10/94, including a fee of $270 paid for by Check Number 0989. This application falls under the Water/Wastewater: 501 - 1000 GPD Program Area, and under the Performance Standards for this program area, we have 45 days of 'in-house' time for our review of your application. If we need further information from you in order to reach a decision on your application, the time we wait for your submittal of that information does not count against the allowable in-house time specified in the performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 days in-house, please contact this office at 879-6563. Please note that this does not constitute receipt of your application under the requirements of Act 250. If you have questions relating to Act 250 jurisdiction, a District Coordinator may be reached at 879-6563. CC: Fp-� the Division of Protection, Irene �"'�." Rober e � Administrative Secretary South Burlington Planning Commission State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Philip Kiley 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Telephone #879-6563 February 4, 1994 RE: Application for Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit, Burlington Billiards, Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Mr. Kiley: Pursuant to State Statute 2.02.B and 2.02J of the Environmental Protection Rules, we have reviewed your application received by this office on January 28, 1994 and have determined it to be incomplete and therefore inadequate for review. We cannot accept your filing as a complete application until the following deficiencies are corrected: 1. Please have Mr. Whittlesey sign the application as the landowner of the property. 2. Please give a complete description of the history of the building, such as when it changed to Acme Paint & Glass on up to the present Burlington Billiards. 3. You will need to calculate the water & sewage flows as follows: 30 gallons per day x no. of seats = x .36 = total fee. 4. Please submit a letter from the city of South Burlington approving the water and sewer allocation for the above referenced project. Page 2 Philip Kiley February 4, 1994 This letter does not acknowledge receipt of your filing as an application, and the comments above do not constitute a technical review of the substance of your filing. This is only an initial review for completeness. We are returning your application package. When we receive the above cited information we will notify you that the application has been accepted and the complete technical review will then follow. Scerely, Irfene L. Roberge� Administrative Secretary Enclosures c Stephen Whittlesey South Burlington Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 9, 1994 Ernest P. Christianson Agency of Natural Resources 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Sewer Allocation, 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Christianson: Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on February 8, 1994 approved the following uses at the above referenced property: 1) adding a 22 seat tavern to an existing retail sales and billiard table rental use (5,100 square feet), 2) convert 2,900 square feet of vacant space to retail (Oakman Electrical Supply) and 3) convert 5,200 square feet of vacant space to retail (Optional Extras) in a 16,800 square foot building. No additional sewer allocation was allocated since previous uses had 69 employees which used an estimated 1035 gpd and the existing and proposed uses will not exceed this amount. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S' cerely, v��ff J e Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 2/8/94 MOTION OF APPROVAL STEPHEN WHITTLESEY s I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Stephen Whittlesey for: 1) adding a 22 seat tavern to an existing retail sales and billiard table rental use (5,100 square feet), 2) convert 2,900 square feet of vacant space to retail (Oakman Electrical Supply) and 3) convert 5,200 square feet of vacant space to retail (Optional Extras) in a 16,800 square foot building containing an existing nonconforming storage use (3600 square feet), 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a plan entitled "358 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT", prepared by Somerset Associates, and dated 6/3/92, with a stamped "received" date of January 28, 1994, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This site plan approval shall not be construed as approval to alter a noncomplying structure. The decision of whether or not to approve alteration to a noncomplying structure shall be made by the Administrative Officer in accordance with Section 19.002 of the zoning regulations. 3. This property lies within Traffic Overlay Zone 6 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 49 P.M. peak hour vehicle trip ends (vte's). I.T.E. estimates the existing approved uses to a generate 47.4 vte's and the existing and proposed uses to generate 73.7 vte's or 24.7 vte's more than is allowed. Pursuant to Section 17.50 of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if it determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. It is the Planning Commission's opinion that the recently completed Dorset Street improvement project_will produce a net benefit in access safety to and from the op tre y'. Therefore, it is the Commission's opinion that the provisions of Section 17.50 are adequately met. 4. The Planning Commission approves the reduction in the number of requiredj parking spaces from 43 to 32 spaces. It is the Planning Commiss on's opinion that due to the off-peak nature of the billiard use that adequate parking will be available. 5. Any new exterior lighting or change in existing lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyonCi the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 3 1 G � X / S0� re, !�- od &_�� 6. The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 7. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the new parking area. 8. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. If rrV641t� JA- s K �j rQ. mo ✓e na� City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 4, 1994 Jeff Nick J.L. Davis Realty P.O. Box 220 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Multipe Uses, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Nick: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Jim Goddette were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 8, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, � (�&W Joe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 9 June 1992 page 7 vision: Mr. D'Elia said a lot of landscaping that was going to be removed has been retained. They are asking to reduce some landscaping at the back of units and on the curve of the driveway. Mr. Burgess noted that staff had said this seems logical. Members agreed. Mr. Austin moved the Plannin Commission approve the revised final plat application of O'Brien Brothers A necy, Inc, to amend the landsca in lan for a four (4) unit residential building on lot 17 of the 18 lot Kirby/Patchen Road subdivision as depicted on a plan entitled "Kirby/Patchen Road, Detail Landscape Plan,". Prepared by CCD and dated 4/29/92. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site plan Application of Philip Kiley for use of 4100 sq. ft. within a 16,988 sq. ft. building for retail sales and rental of billiard tables and accessories, 358 Dorset Street: Mr. Kiley said this is formerly the Lighting House facility. Sales will involve showroom/display. The bulk of the area will be for tables for rent. Regarding landscaping,.Mr. Kiley said there isn't much area to do much with. They propose some dense yews. The San Remo end of the property is already landscaped. Mr. Weith agreed and also suggested a deciduous tree in the front area. Members agreed to another red maple in front. Mr. Kiley said they will remove the gate and fence. Mr. Burgess noted this is a non -complying structure but the building is not being modified. Mr. Kiley noted that most of the facility's business will be done in off-peak hours. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Philip Kiley for use of 4,100 sq. ft. within a 16,988 sq. ft. building for retail sales and rental of billiard tables and accessories as depicted on a plan entitled "358 Dor- set Street, So. Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Somerset As- sociates and dated 6/3/92 with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $900, 3-year landscaping bond priorto issuance of a zonin buildin ermit. The_plan shall be revised prior to permit to show $620 worth of additional lant- ings in the front yard as approved by the City Planner. PLANNING COMMISSION 9 June 1992 page a 2 The plan shall be revised priorto permit to show 9 foot wide parallel garkingspaces. 3 Any new exterior lightin shall be downcastin , shielded lum- inaires, shall not cast li ht beyond the property line, and sha_1.1_ be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 4 The zonin /buildin permit shall be obtained within 6 months_ or this approval is null and void. Ms Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Site Plan application of S.B. Collins, Inc., for demolition of existing structure and construction of a new 936 sq. ft. mini - mart in conjunctiion with gasoline sales, 1314 Williston Road: Mr. Smith located the property at the corner of Patchen Rd. They will add Norway maples to the site landscaping. There will also be a closed dumpster. Gas pumps will be on both sides of the store. Curb cuts will be adjusted and the one on the corner will be eliminated. They are eliminating 4 pumping spots (going from 12 to 8 as the number of cars that can gas up at one time). Mr. Smith noted they have lost business because of the median and hope to retain the business they have now. They will go from full to self-service. Mr. Sheahan questioned whether they will increase traffic be- cause they are going from full to self-service. Mr. Craig noted the allowable vte's are approximately 7 now and they will be going to 34-56. I.T.E. says 168 is the estimate for this use. Mr. Austin said he didn't feel the use would add traffic to Williston Rd. Mr Sheahan felt it might increase turning move- ments but felt traffic would stay the same. Ms. Peacock felt the closing of the curb cut would be valuable. Mr. Burgess asked if poles will have signs on them. Mr. Smith said they will not. He showed pictures of the proposed light poles. Mr. Sheahan noted 4 variances granted by the Zoning Board. Mr Weith said the Agency of Transportation is looking to widen the road which would take it one foot from the proposed canopy. There will also be an issue of access to the site when the widening occurs. If the building were moved back, some parking would be lost. Ms. Peacock noted if parking were made parallel, only one space would be lost. Members agreed to continue the application until next week to allow the applicant to think this over. Memorandum - Planning February 8, 1994 agenda items February 4, 1994 Page 2 Access/circulation: Applicant is proposing a 20% reduction in the width of the Swift Street curb cut from 50 feet to 40 feet. Dumpster: Applicant proposes to cover dumpster storage area with a roof to keep snow falling off the roof and filling up the dumpster area. This will make it easier for the trash hauler to return the empty dumpster to the storage area. Lighting: Applicant will replace all free-standing flood lights with 400 watt metal halide lamps which would be shielded and downcasting. Sidewalk: Plan has been revised to show a sidewalk along the Swift Street frontage. The legal document for the sidewalk easement should be reviewd and approved by the City Attorney. This document should be recorded in the land records prior to permit. 5) STEPHEN WHITTLESEY - MULTIPLE USES - SITE PLAN This project consists of the following: 1) add a 22 seat tavern to an existing retail sales and billiard table rental use (5,100 square feet), 2) convert 2,900 square feet of vacant space to retail (Oakman Electrical Supply) and 3) convert 5,200 square feet of vacant space to retail (Optional Extras) in a 16,800 square foot building containing an existing storage use (3,600 square feet). The last review of this property by the Planning Commission was on 6/9/92 when it approved the billiards sales and rental use (minutes enclosed). The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 1/10/94 granted the applicant a conditional use permit for multiple uses. This property located at 358 Dorset Street/55 San Remo Drive lies within Central District 2. It is bounded on the north by an office and trucking terminal, on the south by a discount beverage store, office and contractor's yard, on the west by Dorset Street and on the east by San Remo Drive. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 35 foot wide shared curb cut on Dorset Street and two (2) curb cuts on San Remo Drive. The southerly curb cut on San Remo Drive is 24 feet wide and the northerly curb cut is 15 feet wide. This property provides access between Dorset Street and San Remo Drive which is shared with the adjoining property to the south. No access changes proposed. E Memorandum - Planning February 8, 1994 agenda items February 4, 1994 Page 3 Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 38.7% (maximum allowed is 40%). Overall coverage is 82.3% (maximum allowed is 90%). Setback requirements are not met. This building is a noncomplying structure subject to Section 19.002 of the zoning regulations. In the CD2 District the cost of any alteration to a noncomplying structure is 25% of the fair market value of the structure. In addition, the parking spaces along Dorset Street and San Remo Drive do not meet the setback requirements. Section 1.6022 of the Central District Zoning Ordinance prohibits parking spaces within 100 feet of the Dorset Street r.o.w. and within 87 feet of the San Remo Drive r.o.w. Floor Area Ratio: The Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) for this lot is 0.38 (maximum allowed is 0.5). This is based on 16,800 square feet of floor space on a 43,950 square foot lot. Traffic: This property lies within Traffic Overlay Zone 6 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 49 P.M. peak hour vehicle trip ends (vte's). I.T.E. estimates the existing approved uses to generate 47.4 vte's and the existing and proposed uses to generate 73.7 vte's. Pursuant to Section 17.50 of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if it determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. In the past the Planning Commission has granted credits for traffic due to the Dorset Street improvements for other properties along Dorset Street. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $75 which is not being met. Additional landscaping was planted along Dorset Street as part of the billiard use and the area along San Remo Drive is adequately landscaped. Staff therefore does not recommend additional landscaping. Parking: The existing and proposed uses require 43 parking spaces by standard and only 32 spaces, including two (2) handicapped spaces, are being provided. This is an 11 space or 26% shortfall. The applicant has submitted parking count information for the billiard sales and rental use (see enclosed) for the months of October through April. This information indicates that the peak parking demand for the use is after 7:00 P.M. on weekdays and after 2:00 P.M. on weekends. On weekdays, the retail and storage uses C J e j)q 5 r yew°' Memorandum - Planning February 8, 1994 agenda items February 4, 1994 Page 4 are closed by 5:00 P.M. and the only uses open Saturday afternoon is the billiard use and Optional Extras. It is staff's opinion, based on the information submitted, that adequate parking will be available given the off-peak nature of the billiard use. Sewer: The additional sewer allocation needed for this project is 825 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit. Dumpster: All dumpsters will be stored on the north side of the building. This area will be screened from San Remo Drive and Dorset Street by a stockade fence. Lighting: No additional lighting proposed. Current exterior lighting consists of three (3) 500 watt halogen lights on the side 141 of the building near the billiard entrance and dual 200 watt flood lamps on the Dorset Street side of the building. 6) SALLY MAJARIAN - DAY CARE CENTER - SITE PLAN This project consists of converting two (2) dwelling units of a four (4) unit multi -family dwelling to a day care facility for a maximum of 20 children. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 1/10/94 granted the applicant a conditional use permit for the day care facility with the stipulation that the proposed sign be wall mounted. This property located at 1473-1475 Williston Road lies within the R-4 District. It is bounded on the north by Williston Road, on the west by Hayden Parkway, and on the east and south by residences. Access/circulation: Access is currently provided by two (2) curb cuts, an 18 foot wide curb cut on Williston Road and a 25 foot curb cut on Hayden Parkway. The Williston Road curb cut is proposed to be closed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 5% (maximum allowed is 20%). Overall coverage is 15% (maximum allowed is 40%). 4 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 19, 1994 Jeff Nick J.L. Davis Realty P.O. Box 220 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Multiple Uses, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Nick: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please respond to these comments, if appropriate, with additional information and/or revised plans by no later than Friday, January 28, 1994. If you have any questions, please give me a call. inc ely, 1 J� Raym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp FAX MZMO DATE: January 31, 1994 TO FAX #: 658-4748 Number of pager to follow: 0 To: Mr. Ray B41&ir Company: South BurlingtOh Phan zlg 4 Zoning From: j*f f Nick Company: J.L. Davis &fealty' Re: 358 Dorset Street f 55 Sara Remo Drive: Burlington Billiards Oakman Electrical Supply Champlain Oil optional Extra ' s Sunday this.:. Sat mrday 22:00pm - 12:0CW Monday th d Friday 8:00am - 5:0%m Saturday 84,00am _ 12:OCpn Monday t:hru Friday 7:00ana - 4:04n Monday thr u Satur a.day 10 : OOam -- 5:0Cpt If you de not receive all pages, please call us i-i(aftediately at: 802-878-9000 J.L. Davis Fax #: 502-879-OSS3 Rowley Place P.0. Box 220. [Zfe. 2A Wlfiistof i. `/er.ror.t 04�0T95 802-878-9000 j M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: Preliminary Comments February 8, 1994 Agenda items Date: January 14, 1994 PROPOSED DAY CARE- 1475 WILLISTON ROAD Williston Road curb cut shall be closed by installing a barrier curb. WHITTLESEY PROPERTY - DORSET STREET Site has very little snow storage capacity. To provide the parking spaces shown on the plan throughout the year, snow will have to be hauled away. BUDGET RENT -A -CAR - AIRPORT PARKWAY 1. There exists a gas main and several telephone cables along the project side of Airport Parkway. 2. The proposed berm shall not obstruct the street drainage. Some regrading along the street may be required. PIZZA PUTT (BARAW) - AIRPORT PARKWAY Plan should have lot dimension and area. .� _ 1 FAX: (802) 658-4748 Jutt +6 urhugtnn N ire B ep artment 575 Burset ttreet *uutll "Burlingtun. Vermont Q5403 To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Jim Goddette, South Burlington Fire Chief Re: February 8, 1994 agenda items Date: January 13, 1994 PROPOSED DAY CARE - HAYDEN PARKWAY & WILLISTON ROAD (802)658-7960 This plan has been reviewed by the Fire Department and at this time I do not see a problem with the project which would effect emergency protection. BURLINGTON BILLIARD BUILDING - DORSET STREET This plan has been reviewed by the Fire Department and at this time I do not see a problem with the project which would effect emergency protection. PIZZA PUTT PROPERTY - AIRPORT PARKWAY Plan reviewed and at this time I do not see a problem with the project. BUDGET RENT A CAR - AIRPORT PARKWAY At this time I do not see a problem which would effect emergency protection. rl Cl t-4 I 3. .4 7 J L- D &:::I V I S F* E: L- T Q, I oL D.,xv AVIS REALTY .410 0 ATII January 17, 1994 TO Mr. Ray Belair, So. Burlington Planning & Zoning FROTI! Jeff Nick 358 Dorset Street / 55 San Remo Drive Fire hydrant locations qin Reno Drive: 105 yards north of property Dorset Street: 125 yards south of property (corner of Dorset & San Remo) 215 yards north of,property (in front of Burlington Rant -All) 75 yards southwest of property V'R Dorset Street. F08t-lt-" brand fax trarSMittaj MeMO 7b,71 #OtP00099. Rowley P.0, Box 220, rZte. 2A WII)iston, Vermont 05495 I ,pace for each employee (Savami, ta.) Two spaces, plus one per chair (Clifton Forge, Va.) Basketball Court Five spaces per court or one per three spectator seats, whichever is greater (Long Beach, Calif.) Bed and Breakfast .75 space per unit (Honolulu, Hawaii) One space per guest room (El Dorado Co., Calif.) One space per sleeping room, plus two per perma- nent residents (Leesburg, Va.) Beauty Parlor (Sec also Barber Shop) Two spaces per operator station and one per each two employees (Norman, Okla.) Three spaces per operator chair (Lake Co., 111.) Four spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Long Bench, Calif.) One space per 100 sq.ft. of floor area (St. Charles Parish, laz.) Bicycle Repair Three spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Hillsborough Co., Fla.) Billiard Hall Two spaces per table (Orange Co., Calif.) One space for each 10 persons of the rated capacity (St. Charles Parish, La.) One for each three seats or one for each 100 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Bay City, Mich.) Bingo Parlor One space for three seats (based on design capacity) or one per 100 sq.ft. of total floor area, whichever is greater (Plano, Tex.) Boarding House (See also Dornzitonj) One space per two beds (El Patin Co., Colo.) At least two parking spaces for each three persons for which accommodations are provided for sleeping (Hopkins, Minn.) One space for each rental unit, plus one additional place for the owner or manager (Savannah, Ga.) Two spaces for the owner occupant and one space for each roomer (Alpena, Mich.) 1.1 spaces per lodging unit (Hillsborough Co., Fla.) 1.25 spaces per unit (Honolulu, Hawaii) 1.8 spaces per boarding or rooming unit (Norman, Okla.) Two spaces for each dwelling unit, plus one for every two roomers (St. Paul, Minn.) One space per every 400 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Gainesville, Fla.) One space per 200 sq.ft. of gross floor area, plus one space per employee (Albemarle Co., Va.) Bookstore 4.5 spaces for every 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area (St. Louis Co., Mo.) Botanical Garden Two spaces per acre (Orange Co., Calif.) Bowling Alley Two spaces for each alley (Gainesville, Fla.) Three spaces per lane, in addition to spaces required for restaurant facilities (Clifton Forge, Va.) Four spaces per each alley (Albany, Ore.) Four spaces for each alley, plus one additional space for each 1.5 employees (Aurora, Colo.) Five spaces per alley, plus one space per employee (Rio Grande Co., Colo.) Five spaces per lane, plus one space per employee on the largest work shift, plus 50 percent of the spaces otherwise required for accessory uses (e.g., bars, restaurants, game rooms) (Lake Co., 111.) Six spaces for each lane (Plano, Tex.) Seven spaces for each bowling lane, in addition to requirements for a place serving food or beverages on the site (St. Clair Shores, Mich.) Campground One dust free 10'x 30' space for every campsite (St. Louis Co., Mo.) Camp One space per employee on the largest shift, plus one space per camp vehicle normally parked on the premises, plus one visitor parking space per each, provided that no fewer than five such spaces shall be provided and no more than 50 such spaces shall be required (Lake Co., 1I1.) One space for every two dormitory units, plus two spaces for every three employees on the maximum Shift, plus one space for every vehicle customarily used in operation of the use (St. Louis Co., Mo.) Cartage, Express, and Parcel Delivery (See also Post Office) One space per each three employees, plus one space per each vehicle maintained (Albemarle Co., Va.) One parking space for each two employees in the largest working shift in a 24-hour period, plus one parking space for each vehicle maintained on the premises (Bonner Springs, Kans.) Car Wash, Full -Serve No parking space is required; one drying space, plus two stacking spaces are required per washing space. A washing space is not a parking space. (Columbus, Ohio) Three spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross leasable area (Long Beach, Calif.) One space per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Hillsborough Co., Fla.) • 10 SITE PLAN CHECK LIST --- Lot drawn to scale --- Survey data (distances and lot size) --- Contours (existing and finished). Existing vegetation and natural features. --- Proposed landscaping (number, variety and size) equal or greater than the required amount in section 19.104 of the Zoning Regulations. --- Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings. --- Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. --- Zoning boundaries -! Number and location of parking spaces. ( RV parking for multi - /family projects over 25 units). - v Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. --�/Location of septic tanks (if applicable). --- Location of any easements. - Lot coverage information: Building, overall and front yard. --- Location of site (Street # and lot #). - / North arrow - Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. --- Exterior lighting details (must be downcasting and shielded). pumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). --- Existing and proposed sidewalks (public). --- Sewer calculation --- Height of new construction. -=- Setbacks (residential district, planned r.o.w., Interstate). - C.O. Zone --- Bike racks --- Traffic generation --- PUD/PCD standarads --- Airport Approach Cone --- Outside storage/display --- F.A.R. s� ot4d i -- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone) 2) APPLICANT (name, address, -phone #) ��� �a16tit�- ��✓ 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) J � - -- GCsf� 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: -3S J-)yrSe F S 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE (S) /-J, H, 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and = floors, square feet per floor) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 4,- ✓' / dz c."" I 9) LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas2.- building, parking, outside storageb.?,;% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings La Landscaping S Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) S S �— - u? -CL-.,14) s- 1 1) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 7a--i . 30 / V i t/ / / g f `/ 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 410 ? Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon ,- ; 12-1p.m. +� L 1-2 p.m. 2-3 P.M. 3-4 p.m. t/C) 4-5 p.m. -3t' 5-6 p.m. ram? 6-7 p.m. /G 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: ,+ �� � % ' �� �� vt 14) PEAR DAYS OF OPERATION: DATE OF SUBMISSION �SI GN Xt URE OF APPLICANT f DATE OF HEARING PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (11 X 17; OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible.) Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, eYistin'- buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' z_ 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. " Number and location of compact car spaces. (This requires seL,a- ra--e Planning Commission approval). I'?umber and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 7e e by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Lc,cation of any easements. Lot. coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot #). North arrow Name of person or firm preparing site plan and late. 2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) 2) APPLI//CANT (name, address, phone #) 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3 S 9 pm. 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S ) R ST(.,a/4 l TGr e Ads &,;T "-x/SI`iN�1 ���gcz tS p CL/s I �tCc� r -�2 Sc?l�1S c 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 6 �) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9) LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas % building, parking, outside storage % 10 ) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ oti Landscaping $ 64/ )(;I _ Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: /`36 -Sy / 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) tic) Ca'U3' Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: e-1 - t Z sty 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: F& I. S A T. /Z - tv- ,9 3 DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT 3s,3 S19N ---P L,)oPs� ca `Tze- i :--_- - Sov. i z 4 E LCz 4/f-)7 c; N S-eACe /'= ,/:?S',, 3 ken}G l b I r CHAMPLAIN OIL s6►+IK,ftsq) (GRASS U . /3�II,ar�s 4 o.l GG- s a 3Ac�c> SC Sic ATT,"� handcup I 9' x 1B'I9' X 181IW X 18'19' X �a'Ic' x 18'I9' x lir x le'IQ' 18'IQ' x le, Q' x te'Ir x 1e'I9' x le'19' x ta'10' x 1 13' x 2o' i I Kf;NIgVLU PAVED Y2`OW MID POLE I MOVE POLE TO NEW LOCA7WN --�---A----A---k---A---A---A----,�---,�--_,�--_,¢-- c)RIDING OWNER SUPPLIED INFORMATION GRASS � a,s�' �F PAVED as a , 7W wx2r vx2r WX27 0'xu' vxzr 0'x22' '---A---A----k----k----A----A----k---A;---A----,�-- 3% DORSET STREET wrSOM BLR14M VT DENSE 'YEWS 18' TO 24" DENSE YEWS 18' TO 24" PJM RHODO _ Not K* —mu .I RED WLE soMERsET ASsocIATEs PAC. = PACHYSANDRA 174 SAND HILL ROAD MSEx JUNCTION, VT MUNSON PROPERTY PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 August 28, 1992 Philip Kiley 131 Ledgewood Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Billiard Sales & Rental, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Kiley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval and the requirement that a zoning/building permit be obtained within six (6) months of the date of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. rely, be Weith, ity Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Steven Whittlesey PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 August 14, 1992 Philip Kiley 131 Ledgewood Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Billiard Sales & Rental, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Kiley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the June 9, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval and the requirement that the zoning/building permit be obtained within six (6) months of the approval date. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cT ly be' Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone # )%//Lc'� 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone A) 1/7' A.s sr- 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) .SANf t= AS -4-- 2 L 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: .3 `S'Q I�oeSE"7- 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) AI/A 6) PROPOSED USE(S) RjFrAr( SA4g=S App R�,uTaL b�LC�Nad rA 61 Es 4 &2p A Ce ESS' b.Q I S 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor)3T 8 D,,a Jer = 79 tr.-jr- sat. F N RFFYO o 0?3 a. Fr. orAL 16 8. 2 vN1rS� 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 7-Lpo p4(,s 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 36•$ %; landscaped areas /% % building, parking, outside storage?2.1% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ Landscaping L06.0 0 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 1 1) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE : OcT. /cS 0 /,9 92 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) y 3 Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon ; 12-1p.m.sz5- ; 1-2 p.m. (.$` 2-3 p.m.6•is 3-4 p.m. 7.0 ; 4-5 p.m. r.2S ; 5-6 p.m. .0 6-7 p.m. s 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: g;pV /Q;p p %oM 14) PEAK AYS OF OPERATION: S 6 DATE F SUBMISSION SIGN RE OF APPLICANT DAT9 OF HEARING XA.,, STATEMENT TO Address city — Terms 5-0 0 0 00 Yv 5 2- /00 00 /00 00 0 e 0 T�227 Ri � y RECEIVED JUN 16 1992 City of So. Burlington MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Philip Kiley for use of 4,100 square feet within a 16,988 square foot building for retail sales and rental of billiard tables and accessories as depicted on a plan entitled "358 Dorset Street, So. Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Somerset Associates, and dated 6/3/92 with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $900, 3-year landscaping bond prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The plan shall be revised prior to permit to show $620 worth of additional plantings in the front yard as approved by the City Planner. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to permit to show 9 foot wide parall,-1 ti=,arking spaces. 3. Any new exterior lighting shall be downcast.ing, shielded lumina ,-.es, ;hall not cast light. '-,eyond the property line, and shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 4. The --oni?gig/building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. M Memorandum - June 9, 1992 June 5, 1992 Page 9 Planning agenda items Landscaping: The landscaping requirement for this project is $10,500 which is not being met. The planting plan is short $3,440. Staff recommends the shortfall be made up by planting some evergreens behind the southerly end of the building and along the I-89 ramp if possible. Plantings will include Norway Maple, Colorado Blue Spruce, Juniper, Littleleaf Linden and Red Maple. The plan shows existing landscaping along the I-89 ramp which does not currently exist. The plan should be revised to show the existing situation. Sewer: The sewer allocation needed for this application is 4440 gpd. The applicant will have to pay the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. Other: The plan should be revised to remove the painted arrows south of the median to comply with the 3/24/92 approval. 8) PHILIP KILEY - BILLIARD SALES & RENTAL - 358 DORSET STREET This project consists of using 4,100 square feet of a 16,988 square foot building for retail sales and rental of billiard tables and accessories. The remaining 3,815 square foot area will be vacant. 9,073 square feet of the building fronting on Sam Remo Drive is being used for sales, rental and maintenance of fork lifts. The remainder of this building which is the subject of this application fronts on Dorset. Street. The Planning Commission approved a discount. food store in this portion of the building on 6/4/91 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 358 Dorset Street is within the Central District 2 zone. It. is bounded on the north by Champlain Oil, on the south by South Burlington Realty (office and discount beverage store), on the west by Dorset Street and on the east by San Remo Drive. Access/circulation: The Dorset. Street portion of the lot is presently served by one (1) curb cut and the San Remo Drive portion is served by two (2) curb cuts. There is no direct access across the lot from Dorset. Street to San Remo Drive 0 Memorandum - Planning June 9, 1992 agenda items June 6, 1992 Page 10 because of a gate and fence. The gate and fence will be removed as part of this application. The Dorset Street improvements will result in the one (1) 35 foot wide curb cut on Dorset Street. Traffic circulation is acceptable. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 38.7`/0 (maximum allowed is 40%). Overall coverage is 82.3% (maximum allowed is 90%). Setback requirements are not presently met and no changes are proposed which would alter the buildings. This building is therefore a noncomplying structure. The applicant should be aware that Section 1.80 of the Central District zoning prohibits alterations +o the building except for alterations to facades and exterior finishes because this building is a noncomplying structure. An alteration is defined as "a change or rearrangement in the structural parts or in the exit facilities, or an enlargement, whether by extending on a side or by increasing in height". Floor Area Ratio: The Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) for this lot is .39 (maximum allowed is .5). This is based on 16,988 square feet of floor space on a 43,950 square foot lot. Traffic: This property lies within Traffic Overlay Zone 6 which would allow this property to generate a maximum of 49 peak hour trips during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates that the existing light industrial use plus the proposed retail use of the entire 7,915 square feet now vacant would generate 47.4 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. Parking: This project will require a total of 27 parking spaces based on 4100 square feet of retail floor area. The existing industrial use on the San Remo Drive side requires three (3) spaces and no spaces are being allocated to the vacant space. This property therefore requires a total of 30 spaces and the plans indicae that 32 will be provided. The parallel parking spaces must be widened to nine (9) feet. Landscaping: The landscaping requirement for this project $900 which is not being met. Only six (6) Dense Yews proposed which would leave landscaping $620 short of requirement. 10 IS are the Memorandum - Planning June 9, 1992 agenda items June 5, 1992 Page 11 Lighting: No additional lighting proposed. Current lighting consists of two (2) 500 watt halogen lights on the side of the building near the entrance and dual 200 watt flood lamps on the y front of the building. 0t -r -•: Nt1 dtlrnp 5t-ers Proposed. 11 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 5, 1992 Philip Kiley 131 Ledgewood Burlington, Vermont. 05401 Re: Billiard Sales & Rental, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Kiley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 9, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner E n c 1 s JW/rtcp PLANNING COMMISSION 4 JUNE 1991 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday 4 June 1991, at.7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Catherine Peacock, David Austin, Terry Sheahan, William Craig Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Carl Lisman, Hal Bensen, Bill Thompson, Val & Enid Kupiec, Barbara Pell, Madeline Yandow, Rita Airoldi, Gretchen & Vernon Wamsganz, Ethel Goldstein, Scott Smiht, Joseph Randazzo, Mildred Estey, Ed Gravel, Brian Lane, Attilio Bonfanti, Lloyd Kranz, Stephen Whittlesy, John Steele, Greg Rabideau, John Larkin 1. Other Business: Mr. Weith noted the Deslauriers will be coming in for approval to operate a driving range and small mini -golf facility. The property is approved for recreational use but they are going to open it to the public. Mr. Weith said he felt it was an expansion of use and required Commission approval. Ralph Deslauriers, Jr., asked if they could set up a driving range now for members use only. Members said it would be OK as long as it was made clear it was for members use only. Mr. Weith and Mr. Burgess noted that at last night's City Council meeting, Councilmen decided to warn a second public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan for 24 June and to go ahead with the proposed plan with the addition of wording that says that the Southeast Quadrant is under interim zoning and when new zoning is complete, the Zoning, Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan will be brought into concurrence. 2`. Minutes of 16 Apri 1 1991 Mr. Craig moved to approve the Minutes of 16 April as printed. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Site Plan application of Attilio bonfanti for use of an existing building for discount food store use (4,000 sq. ft.), sales, rental and maintenance of fork lifts (9,700 sq. ft.) and 4,000 square feet of vacant space, 358 Dorset Street. Mr. Whittlesey said the building was built in 1960 to house a roofing company. Acme Glass then used it, then Century Lighting until last year. The last 2 uses didn't generate much traffic. The back of the building houses Liftech Co. which has no retail PLANNING COMMISSION 4 June 1991 page 2 business at all and almost no traffic. There is a fence that separates the rear and front parts of the building. Mr. Bonfanti said his daughter will run the new business. He said they don't generate a lot of traffic but attract people who buy in quantity. Mr. Sheahan asked what the paved section next to the lawn is for. Mr. Whittlesey said it used to be a parking area for employees. The new road will cut off 20 ft. of it and he didn't think it would be used for parking any more. Mr. Sheahan asked if it could be made into green space. Mr. Whittlesey said the only reason not to would be a need for additional parking. Mr. Sheahan noted there is no curb cut there and it couldn't be used for parking. Other members agreed they would like to see an extension of green space there. Mr. Craig noted the City Engineer suggested removing the outermost 2 parking spaces and making that area green space as well. It is so close to Dorset St. and there is need for stacking area for at least one car on the property. Members agreed this should be done after the Dorset St. widening. Mr.._Austin_moved_the_Planni.nn-Commission�anj2rove-the -Site -Plan -an= plicatien_of _Atti1i-Ban faeti._for_use_of _an_existi.nohuildi.nn._for discount -food -store -use ,t4,QQQ_s ._ft.� _seles_rental_and_main- t_ * tenance_of_fork_1ifts_k9;.2QQ_s_ft.j_and_411000_sn__ft__of_vacant space_as_de icted_on_.a---2lan_entitled_"_358_Dorset_Street,,_" Whittlese _Lot "_and_dated_received_5/28/41,._wite_the_followinn s t �. u l a t ions:. 1_-Use -of _the_4,.000 j_q__foot-vacant—snace_for_anv-purpose-other than _unused,_vacant-space _shall -require _s ite_21an-approval _bV-the Planninn_Commission_ _ 2--The_ lan_shall_be-revised-prior.-to-issuance`of^a-zoninn-12ermit to_show_the_two_421_western_most_parki.nn-spaces-eliminatedµ--The eliminated_ arkin__u aces_shall_be-replaced _b _lawn_within_6 months_ef_the_substantial_com`letion_of_the_Dorset_Street'2ro1ect. _The revised_ lan_shall_also _indicatee:this___The_revised-plan shall_be-submitted -to -and a� rp QuedµbtheCitPlanner�_ 3.,zTheznlan-shall_be_revised_ rior_to_Permit_to_show-the_front unused.paved-area -remoued.and_replaced-with_lawn, 4, _The _annlicant_shall-post _a -bond -in -an -amount -to -be -determined bit the_City_Engineer_and_Planner__to_insure-complianceµwitb-the__ reSuirements_of_stipulatioos_#2_and_#3_ _ 5__A_zonin-Pe rmit_must-be_obtained_within-6_months-or -this apt ro u a l_ i s _null -and-void r- M?6;� ,ru CHAMPLAIN OIL 0 T et- ' SHRUS — I GRAJ . I ' I w LJ Ix L■ 1�N N 'cj:f ZI L i handica I 1 9' x �' x S' x A' x rww x w x 10' x B R I P3xh 13Xn D i P � !SHED ILI: ? E PAVED AD'' LIGHT I AND POLE i NEWE POA CURBING Llw MUNSON vr %7h JUK 3. IN2 t� PWT PLAN I'- OWNER SUPPLIED INFORMATION JS�XXNWS GRASS 0 m w Z Lc) 3 I 9'x hrx hs'x hs'x hs'x hwx h8'x 18' WITH PERMISSION OF TENENT PAVED 9' x 181 9' x 18'I 9' x 18'I 9' x 18' I 9' x 18' I mwom PAVED CURBS L I GRASO' I 0 uJ I z ¢ � I PAVED GRASS M Preliminary comments June 9, 1992 agenda May 19, 1992 Page 2 PHILIP KILEY - BILLIARD SALES & RENTAL - 358 DORSET STREET --- zoning regulations do not allow parking in the front yard, however, the existing lot is nonconforming and the Planning Commission will probably allow parking in the front yard but only from the building back, the handicapped space must therefore be relocated. --- provide cost estimate of improvements to the building. --- show parking spaces on entire lot. --- provide details of any existing or proposed exterior lighting. --- if a dumpster is proposed, it should be shown on the plan and it must be screened. --- provide square footage devoted to proposed use and retail floor area. --- the Dorset Street reconstruction plans show a 35 foot curb cut for this property and the plan shows only a 30 foot curb cut. --- landscaping in the amount of 3% of the building improvement cost would have to be planted, provide planting schedule and show plantings on plan. --- plan does not show structure which covers the most easterly parking space. Is the structure to be removed? Plan should also show the light pole in this same vicinity. --- indicate whether any doors will be removed, relocated or altered. The applicant should be aware that Section 1.80 of the Central District zoning prohibits alterations to the building except for alterations to facades and exterior finishes because this building is a noncomplying structure. An alteration is defined as "a change or rearrangement in the structural parts or in the exit facilities, or an enlargement, whether by extending on a side or by increasing in height". --- Dorset Street reconstruction plans show building 20 feet from new r.o.w. line and plan shows it to be 25 feet. This should be corrected. N M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: June 9, 1992 Preliminary Comments Date: May 26, 1992 WHITTLESEY PROPERTY 358 DORSET STREET Plan of the above referenced property is acceptable. S.B.COLL_INS PROPERTY. WILLISTON ROAD 1. Sidewalk shall be 5 feet in width. It shall be consructed along the Patchen Road line continuous across the driveway where the thickness shall be 8 inches. 2. The street r.o.w. line of the intersection of Patchen and Williston Road is along the back of the existing sidewalk not as plans show. DR. SLACK PROEPRTY, GILBERT STREET Plan dated March 1992 is acceptable. 1 -uutb Nurliugtnu Hire Brpartmrnt 575 Dorset O§treet 5attth Nurlingtun. Vermont 05403 (802) 658-7960 M E M Q R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: James Goddette, Fire Chief Re: June 9, 1992 agenda items Date: May 26, 1992 S.B. COLLINS INC 1314 WILLISTON ROAD Plans were reviewed by the Fire Department and at this time I do not see a problem with this project. HOWARD SLACK 2 LOT SUBDIVISION 24 GILBERT STREET Plans were reviewed by the Fire Department and at this time I do not see a problem with this project. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGENCY LANDSCAPING AMENDMENT PATCHEN ROAD It is suggested that the applicant substitute a low growing shrub to replace the crabapple trees because these trees will cause a problem for the Fire Department gaining access to the second story and the roof area. PHILIP KILEY. BILLIARD SALES & RENTAL. 358 DORSET STREET The building renovation plans should be reviewed by the Department of Labor & Industry to be certain the building meets Fire Codes. Access should be available across this property from Dorset Street to San Remo Drive. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 May 26, 1992 Philip Kiley 131 Ledgewood Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Billiard Sales & Rental, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Kiley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please submit requested information and/or revised plans no later than Tuesday, June 2, 1992. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S/cieIy, R J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp Mr. Richard Ward November 29, 1994 Zoning Administrative Officer South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment Dear Mr. Ward. I am writing to you and the zoning board of Adjustment relative to the stipulation place on me Philip Kiley d/b/a Burlington Billiards at the appeal hearing dated December 13, 1993. This restriction (Serving hours) was adjusted at a hearing dated July 11, 1994. Where as recreational use (Sect. 1.10) in Central district II is no longer a prohibited use for this zoning district requiring a variance I feel that these restrictions are no longer required. There have not been any complaints to or by the police department relative to this use or any use, to my knowledge, lodged against Burlington Billiards. Respectfully ours, ? ". Ci e a /�� Philik Kiley Burlington Billiards Z// Z-' /r �ILLIARO" Complete Pro -Shop Sales & Service 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 660-8989 KILEY, Phil Burlington Billiards Phil Kiley, Burlington Billiards is requesting that the condition of approval dealing with hours of serving be removed. As of November 7, 1994, indoor recreation facilities are permitted uses, the use billiard parlor no longer involves a variance. Enclosed is a letter dated November 29, 1994 from Phil Kiley. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 April 29, 1992 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Mr. Philip Kiley 131 Ledgewood 80 Austin Dr; ve Burl i.rigtrin , Vermont. 05401 Re: 350 Dorset. Street. Dear P-ii l : Be advised that. the S,. .it.h Purling _ c Zoning of Adjustment has ruled that your request +, upe-lat.F• billyui.? parlor and pro- sh,-q-, is a retail use which is allowed in the Central District. Yvuz, p:' g_,osa? is subject to site plan approval by the - Planning t"'oinmi_�sion. Please contar-t. the City Planner, Joe Weith for ,heduling ar;d Planning Commission review . if you have. :any questions please don't hesitate to call me.. Very t.ra 7-_,2-iing Administrative Office- RW/mcp Vermont State Pockets Billiards Assoc. 131 Ledgewood Burlington, Vermont 05401 April 6, 1992 Richard Ward Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Ward: I am writing to you seeking approval and permits to operate a billiards parlor at 358 Dorset street. This property is zoned Central District 2. A permitted use for this district is Retail as listed in section 1.101 of the South Burlington zoning regulations. The structure of the business will be built around the profiles of average billiard rooms on a national scale. The descriptions and statistics for the average billiard room is derived from a survey done by the Billiards & Bowling Institute of America. Some of the statistics used in determining VSPBA's structure are as follows: PARTICIPANTS INCOMES - The household incomes for 21% of the participants exceed $50,000 and 35 % of the participants come from household incomes of between $25,000 and $50,000. REVENUES - The average billiard room receives 49% of their revenues by retailing table time. 31% percent of the revenue is derived from the operation of a Pro Shop. These Pro Shops sell at retail home tables, cue sticks and other related equipment. The remaining 20% of the income is divided between food sales and other various sources. With these statistics in mind VSPBA has design its business around a upscale billiards parlor with 12 to 15 full size, top quality tables. The rates for these tables will be $3.00 per hour for each player. It is also planned to provide a Pro Shop where tables, cues and other merchandise will be sold at retail. There are plans to provide some snack bar refreshments (Candy, Soda, Ice Cream etc.) through vending machines. It is also planned for the entertainment of waiting patrons and to have several pieces of coin operated sports equipment (Bumper pool, Foos Ball, Shuffle Board). Some of this equipment will be offered for Free. Resp cltfully, Philip iley, Pre ident of VSPBA To: Zoning Board of South Burlington, Vermont Subject: Appeal of Philip Kiley Ladies and Gentlemen: Before you is a request from Philip Kiley requesting permission to operate a billiard parlor and retail pro -shop on Dorset Street. Having served on the Board of Selectmen in Shelburne for four years in the early 70s I can understand and sympathize with the problems in the administration of zoning and planning laws. In ruling on this request, please bear in mind that the game of pool, unfortunately for those who love it, is saddled with an image that is as negative as it is unfair. Books, magazines, newspapers, and especially the movies, when they deal with the game at all, almost always show it being played in decrepit public rooms that seem to be halfway houses for the nearest penitentiary. Journalists seem incapable of writing about the game without stressing sleaze. Two popular Paul Newman movies — The Hustler and The Color of Money— are prime offenders and have gone a long way toward creating the stereotype of the pool hall as a haven for felons, psychopaths, cheaters, con men, drunks, and drifters. As a realist, I can understand the temptation of fiction writers to portray pool halls in this way, but as a longtime player of the game I know how false is the public perception of the game. The stereotypes have given rise to all sorts of restrictive municipal laws and policies and have interfered with the development in the United States of one of the world's oldest and most popular pastimes. A large segment of the population is being inconvenienced and in some areas even denied a place to practice a wonderful hobby. How large a segment? Three major surveys by the A.C. Nielsen Company reveal the surprising fact that pool and billiards are second only to bowling in the United States as a competitive participant sport; there are between 20 and 30 million people who play at least one game of pool a year. Americans who want some friendly competition are likelier to pick up a cue than a golf club, a tennis racket, or a ping-pong paddle. And for the first time in its long history, women are playing in significant numbers. In some metropolitan areas, tavern leagues attract a thousand players and more to weekly matches, and as many as one-third to one-half are women. The growth in the game to such a level has come in spite of resistance and even hostility on the part of many city officials to billiard rooms. The game has been forced to grow mainly by means of coin -operated tables in bars. A bar owner can install a coin -operated pool table in most communities with no questions asked as long as he has a vending -machine permit; the businessman who wants to open a billiard room in which players are charged according to how long they play faces one hurdle after another, including the need to make appearances before public bodies such as this one. The difference is unfair and discriminatory. -2— It is often easier to open an establishment where customers try to get drunk than it is to open an establishment where they merely push balls around with sticks. Why that should be is a question that greatly disturbs players and those involved in the manufacture and distribution of billiard equipment and supplies, a multimillion dollar industry. Certainly there is nothing about the game itself that should raise special fears. Quite the contrary. The game in fact is a wonderful physical and intellectual challenge. It's an absorbing, relaxing pastime, and to play it well takes good eyesight, hand -eye coordination, imagination, concentration, discipline, practice, coaching, and brains. Yes, brains, for to analyze a random array of balls correctly and decide the best way of attacking it can be as complicated as a chess position. The game is also chesslike in its demand for balancing offense and defense. No wonder it has lasted 300 years and is so popular all over the world. In England, for example, a variation called snooker is the number one television sport, far surpassing soccer. To sum it up in a word, the game is fun. Stereotypes must be set aside when dealing with the real world and the issue before you. Certainly there have been and are scary pool halls where you wouldn't want to take your mother or your date . . . unless they were out on bail. And there are billiard rooms that differ from those dens of iniquity as much as day differs from night. What counts, in the end, is the concept and the management. What sort of clientele will the room attract? How will it be supervised and by whom? A well -conceived and well -managed billiard room can be a civic asset. It can be a bright, open, clean, inviting place that appeals to couples, families, housewives, and seniors — in short, anyone interested in a few hours of congenial social recreation — as well as to serious students of the game. Examples of this new breed of billiard room are springing up all over the country, as the game is enjoying one of its periodic booms. Cue Connection in Merrimack, New Hampshire is one I am familiar with. Corner Billiards in Plattsburgh, New York is another. Believe me, you can take your mother into either of those places and have a thoroughly enjoyable time. Rooms like those are civic assets because they provide another meeting place, another social focal point, another alternative to the local bar. How many things are there to do in your community on a rainy, snowy, or cold day? A businessman willing to spend money to provide an attractive option should be encouraged and even applauded. Regarding the specific issue of granting this appeal, I ask you to look at Mr. Kiley. I can vouch for him personally. I have known him for ten years as a man of the highest character and reliability. He is starting this venture because he deeply loves the game and because he wants to create a place for it that he can be proud of. As a lover of the game, he wants to showcase it to its best advantage. I have no doubt at all that Mr. Kiley's endeavor will be a credit to South Burlington and to the game. Playing conditions will be so good that I won't be surprised if some members of this Board start chalking up. — 3 — I urge you, therefore, to grant the petitioner's request for permission to operate a billiard room. Your action will make South Burlington an even more attractive place to live in than it already is. Donald E. Talbert I-12 Stonehedge South Burlington, Vermont 05403 ~ ID qi 13 aLRcK ~ ���� w � nso ~ cHRwoss TO rnoPsmry 00) till Jx SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT ul -18-92 BU IP ffJOURR NT OL Fr'DR W.Na | ./ �~. po- 5OMERSB�550ClRTE5 I74 ,5RND HILL ROFlD �-J| E55EX JUNCTION, VT 356 PORSET5T "i UIV5 o W ct ( LA LNU --- L e 'PARKilVC.-j A IV CHAMP IVW E. 91 of- rt vy i'v croar Sto h re 4c v hCllr 11 L S' d" I :2-31 X. wovcr. he,4 door I e' Z -20` Z.� � � r O r o0c) q �� � �.,.►t... ..e--�..r• ��'� .FL.r�c..,�e�,,�r dam✓ ,..E+00t. -Ott z rt-1 6E4" - -�o 0--- -A-t-� City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 13, 1992 Mr.Philip Kiley 131 Ledgewood Burlington, Vermont. 05401 Re: Zoning appeal Dear Mr. Kiley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. on Monday, April 27, 1992 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your request. for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this hearing. Sincerely, i Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1 Encl RW/mcp cc: Stephen Whittssey LEGAL NOTICES NOTICES 1 LEGAL NOTICES sub section 1 -003 LEGAL LEGAL NOTICES setback requirements, to service station annex re uses, outh of approxi- exten 9 n of Re ulat ons. ton grmission Regulations and Chapter the Gated at 1475 She pair 1400 square feet) Burlin with a Request is for pe bed 111, Title 24, V.S.A. South Burlington Zoning Road. Appeal of Stephen in conjunction beauty salon and interior to construct a one at 31 room effig 4y5P Board of Adjustment will g hold a public hearing at #4 Whittesey anddPe islonil of located square containing 33 Swift Street. feet in conjunction with an the South offices Offices, appealing .a the Administrative Officer to a use set- g residential unit O'Brien $emson existingon a # dental Off ice93 541 once Room, 575 Dorset South Burlington, pertainin° within the Central II of the South ppatrick rovai lot containing 1320 Conditional uses square feet ted at Street, Vermont on Monday, AP P.M. to D strict Burlington Regulations. out- 1683 Williston Road. sub section 13.220 23 13. 27 1992 at 7:00 consider the following: ermission uest is for p aionrlOf toeoperate a billiard pfrom side storage and of the Richard Ward I contractor yard ula Administrative Reg #1 Appeal of William and ro shop and retail Anon -conform- existing mouth gurimgton Zoning tions. Request is for per -Officer a Timothy O'Brien seeking variance from Section an ingg structure, located at Street. rate mission to °� 1992 and distribution April 11, a 1900.Non-complying ub section sub_ 358 Dorset #3 Appeal of Gary storage facility of Adirondack on a lot con- structures, 19.002 alterations and ex- Bourne seeking approval 9.65 Mul- fieldstone mining 2.34 acres located pansions of the South Regulations. from Section tiple uses sub section (A) at lot #3, Kimball Avenue. Burlington BURLIN6TON Request is for permission a 2'z60' ad conditional uses of the Burlington Regula- #S John L. Wolff seeking o SOUTH to construct ZONINO NOTICE struc- dition to an existing South Request is for per- lions. Req a a variance conforming 19.00 Non lure which is non- mission to operate In accordance with the complying to the minimum Next Column �en°n1ed Next Column Continued South Budinton Zoning Continued Next Column Continued Next Column PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 April 7, 1992 Vermont State Pockets Billiards Association 131 Ledgwood Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 358 Doi -set Street Dear Mr. Kiley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Your request to operate a billiard parlor from a property located at 358 Dorset Street., is in my opinion, considered as an indoor re(_-,.reatir)nal fac.ilit.y. Such a use is prohibited within the Central District II zone. Section 1.101 allows for retail uses and Commercial I District provides for indoor recreational uses. Based on my review -If your request, my ruling is that the use as proposed is hereby denied. Should you have.any further questions pertaining to this matter, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 28, 1993 Mr. Steven Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Hearing, 55 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Whittlesey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, January 10, 1994 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your request for a conditional use permit. Please plan to attend and be prepared to address the criteria enclosed. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1 Encl RW/mcp City of South Burlington ` Application to Board of Adjustment Date, t -2 2 Applicant wne leasee, agent APPLICATION # HEARING DATE FILING DATE' FEE AMOUNT Address .�oy Swt Sr STWff .ET Telephone # Landowner Address �3r}o So. Location and description of property ,�s�' _Doi1Se %- 5,7`Rc4� Type of application check one ( L") appeal from decision of Administrative Officer.( )request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question Reason for appeal The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and any other additional information which will serve as support evidence to the Board. 1 /1--41 Hearing Date I Signature of Appellan Do not write below this line SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Day of Week at to consider the following: Month and Date Time Z / Appeal Of /(.�,.� /[.e a.�. _ a� -_ • /`�, 4...., - of the Sou �h1Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to Qi � ��'t �✓ /��1....�.I"L Q.•e__t � Z:�.t..► ��;�../1.Ci .4 �t O/d . -� �,�•-'-z-r, 4..� VL11ulal Use City of South Burlington Application to Board of Adjustment Date Applicant �"-�-e L c< Owner, leasee, agen Address 300 5�..<Jr` �- S . Telephone # APPLICATION # HEARING DATE / �/0 ^/Y' FILING DATE A FEE AMOUNT Landowner _<:�e. Address Location and description of property Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer( i;,--)request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question Reason for appeal r ' f- The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and any other additional information which will serve s support evidence to the Board. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on M&-yi 4e e, Dav of/Week 4 /0,1�`4 t ` Montli and �Date Appeal of at At to consider the following: Time f S seeking Jr 66411- from Section of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Requo .st is for permission to • � �� ,� �i !�. ,��. - ,V TO: South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment FROM: Jeff Nick, J.L. Davis Realty Stephen Whittlesey, Owner DATE: January 10, 1994 RE: Multiple use permit for Building located at 358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive. We feel that the proposed uses will not have an adverse affect for the following reasons: 1) CAPACITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES The capacity of the existing community facilities (i.e. sewer and water) will not be affected. The previous tenant, Liftech, employed 13 people. The total employment level for the four businesses (Burlington Billiards, Oakman Electric, Champlain Oil, and Optional Extras) is ten (10). The average retail customer typically does not need bathroom facilities, and except for the employee bathrooms, neither business requires water for their operations. (Burlington Billiards has been previously approved) 2) CHARACTER OF THE AREA The change of use will not adversely affect the character of the surrounding area. The building at 358 Dorset St. was constructed in 1960 and 55 San Remo Dr. was built in the early 1970's. Both are located between the gas and oil depot to the north and a Contractor's yard and Beverage store to the south. 3) TRAFFIC The traffic on the area roads will not be adversely impacted. Champlain Oil will typically run not more than 1-2 forklift loads per day via San Remo Drive. Oakman and Optional Extras, based on their past experiences, are low traffic generators. Also, the new median strip forces all south bound traffic to enter the lot via San Remo Drive. 4) BYLAWS Oakman and Optional Extras are retailers and thus are permitted uses. Champlain Oil uses the west end of the San Remo Dr. building to store supplies which supplements the inventory in their main warehouse. Both the building and total lot coverage are within the allowable limits. 5) ENERGY RESOURCES The building is currently heated by natural gas. Any interior improvements will be insignificant. One additional energy efficient gas heater may be added. January 6, 1994 358 Dorset St./55 San Remo Dr. USE SIZE, AND PARKING ESTIMATES USE SIZE Burlington Billiards 5,100 sf Tavern 720 sf (22 seats) 12 Billiard Tables Oakman Electrical Supply 2,900 sf Retail 300 sf Office 150 sf Storage 2,450 sf Champlain Oil Co. 3,600 sf Storage 3,600 sf Optional Extras 5,200 sf Retail 1,500 sf Office 900 sf Storage 2,500 sf Utility 300 sf TOTAL PARKING SPACES: PARKING SPACES Daytime Evening 10 20 6 0 0 0 8 - 10 0 5 2 31 22 CHAMPLAM OIL GRASS* nam MAPS stcrm 'm "Dm au4joamoLuam In 0 tail j('lr;rxlr.Txtad x Iry r x Ir. ir x W.r r PAVED Nor uZrNo� 7— DOM YE W Ir _W 24' pim "m T_ MLEFSEr ASSOCLM 22— r -PAC- = PACHYSANDRA MUNSON PROPz-RTv, GRASS + c ver PAVED GRASS e"k Z PAVED rx= I r X.= rxzr rxa GRASS I 3. "I E i-- W ct- 0 0 CHAMPLAIN OIL i C� sr�Rues� I GRASSY j DUAL 20OW FLOOD LAMPS W ! �" o P I �I z; flt mr-o WIt1r.0 -- ----/---,r�----14-----14---14�----1---k-----A----4---- OL ■ 9' x 181 9' x 1819' x 18' p' x le, r i007 lki • handIcap PaI9 a 19' x 18' 19' x 18' 9' x 18' 19' x 18' 19' x 18' ! X k- 0 I x 18,14' x 18,19' A 18' 19' x 18' 19' W B ED PAVED i Q'`O YARD LIGHT AND POLE i MOVE POLE TO NEW LOCATION — CURBING OWNER SUPPLIED INFORMATION 358 DOFW STREET on MUCK vr DENSE YEWS 18' TO 24" DENSE YEWS 18' TO Now PJM RHODO rrr _ 1M�L RED MAPLE L VOW RSETSAD ASSHILL PAC. = PACHYSANDRA ElSOM174 174 SAND HILL ROAD ROAD ESSEX JUNCTION, yr MUNSON PROPERTY -\ r Go,-I--A.4ai' 001,`j�.n G ( 19' 0' x 18' V x 18' 0' x 18' 0' x 18' 0' x 18' VX22' 1 9'X22' ! O'X22' I 0'X22' I VX22' 9'x22' I GRASS U ` t t�vh� 4 C- i ),IeS 24" 1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 18, 1993 Mr. Stephen Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 55 San Remo Drive Dear Steve: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This office along with the City Attorney has reviewed the zoning by-laws for the City, along with your letter and the one which was submitted by Mr. Oakman. We are of the opinion that the use as proposed by Mr. Oakman for your property located at 55 San Remo Drive is a permitted use. You will be required to secure approval from the Planning Commission for site plan review and also a multiple use permit from the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Mr. Jeff Nick of J.L. Davis Company has discussed the application procedures with the City. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very %truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1 Encl RW/mcp November 5, 1993 300 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 55 San Remo Drive Dear Sir: Your letter of the 2nd of November relates to two different situations with respect to the use of the property at 55 San Remo Drive. In one, the removal of Liftech Company from the building, according to your letter, has activated Section 19.006 and the concept of "abandonment" in as much as the building has not been occupied by a similar use for more than six months. When this building was erected in 1969-70, its use as an industrial service contract was in conformity with the zoning law of that period. I invested in this building , trusting that it could be used indefinitely in the same manner. Now you state that what appeared to be a property right in this district can be taken away. Certainly, I have not abandoned the building, in fact I have been actively pursuing possible occupants; the recession hasn't helped. The present candidate, Oakman Electrical Supply, Inc. would use less than a third of the floor space, some 2,400 square feet, or less than one sixth of the building if the entire length from Dorset Street to San Remo Drive is considered one building. When Mr. Oakman approached us toward using part of 55 San Remo Drive to take over the business previously conducted at 75 Maple Street in Burlington, we assumed that the prospective user was a retail organization that would come under the permitted uses stated in Par 1.101 of the Zoning Regulations relating to Central District 2. When it was indicated that Oakman Electrical Supply was deemed to be a wholesaler (not permitted) by the zoning office, we approached Mr. Oakman relative to obtaining evidence confirming his status as a retailer. He went to his car and called his bookkeeper in Rutland and produced the following data; from April 1, (the beginning of his tax year) through October 25, 1993, his Burlington sales have amounted to $285,170.88. On a substantial part of these sales a sales tax of $11,634.07 was remitted. On a portion of the remainder (licensed contractors) his sales were non-taxable. Thus,over 80% were made as retail sales (wholesale sales are non- taxable). I was under the impression that a permitted use did not need specific approvals and thus was shocked to hear that site plan approval had to be obtained from the planning board. Actually from my observations, the times that I have visited the Maple Street store, there are few customer vehicles parked there at any one time. At this point, Oakman Electric is really under the gun, their former quarters on Maple Street is being taken over by a musical supply company next week. Their lease with me, however, is on a month -to -month basis and they could move given at least a thirty one day notice. In light of this new information from Mr. Oakman, (Please see attached letter) I respectively ask that you consider reviewing your past decision regarding this matter. Thank you for your time and patience. Sincerely, 4S ephen M. Whittlesey Phone: 77"558 RUTLAND, VERMONT 05701 Novembex 4, 1993 ThutL6 da y 3 : 3 0 PM Mx. Stephen M. Whittte6ey 300 Swint Stxeet South BuAZington, - Vexmont 05403 Re: 55 San Remo Drive Dews M. Wh.ittkesey: 1 undeastand that the town o6 South Bu&ting#on has questioned whethex on not my buz ine.b,s is a to ta,i,C' busine.6s and there 6oxe allounbte under the ewutent t i_st o6 peAm.itted uses in .the city centex d .6txi(-, t. Let me assuxe you that we ate veAy much a xetaii bu6.ines s We 6eZt etectt)u.eak iuppti.es to both the genexai pubti.e as wW a6 6mal'Z eontAa.ctoxs. Most -stems axe 6otd .indiv.cduatty on .in dmaU .dots, not .in bulk. A tn-ue whote6akeh deak6 mostey .in bulk baked and s ett.6 to eo ntAactoxs ox kwcg e in-6t i.tuttio nak UZ en.e . Most o6 o uA in.v ento)Ly is deQ,i.vexed via smaU txurzk and never on a ticacton txa Uex. Du,%ing the pex.iod o� Ap&iZ 1, 1993 thxu Oetobex 25, 1993 we had gross 6aQe.s o� $285,680.88 and eoP.e.eeted state bakes -tux totaZUng $71, 634. 07. Thus outs taxabZe sa e,6 totatted $232, 680. 00 ox 82% o� our totat business. To me this .i.6 the atnongeat .indication that we 6houkd be cons.idted a netaiZ opexati,on. I have been .in business .in Chittenden County Son 4.4 yeaxs, sexv.ing the genexat public. I have hopesuZky 6otd my buitdi.ng tDca,ted at 75 Mapte S.tAeet .in ButcUngton, Vermont and am down.6,izing my business. I am going Shom 17,000 SquaAe Feet os space down to 21500 Squahe Feet. I picked you), building because o f the excellent iocat.i.on and the 6Ai.endey bus.ine.66 attitude o6 South BuAtington, Vermont. 1 have onty two emp.1?oyees .in .this business 601c economic neason6. I hope that my business wiZZ be an a66et .to your budkding and to the Town o f South Butting.ton. In addition I woukd akso point out that oux packing needs axe m.irumaZ. At oux cuktent toeati.on at 75 Mape;e Stxeet .in Su).li.ngton our expex.ience has been .that we -typically handle, at the most, app>toximateky 3-4 custom" at any one time. Ptea.6 e jee.l' ghee to ca U me with any quuti.o ns , S *en.e.e , Chx.iatophelr. F. Oalzman, Pxesiden.t, Clue] Executive 06 6 i.cex, Cha.inma.n 0j The Board and Owner. Oakman Etec A i.cak Supply, Inc, a Vermont Conpoxati.on .in bus.ine66 �otc. atmos.t 94 yewr.6. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 2, 1993 Mr. Steve M. Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 55 San Remo Drive Dear Steve: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This letter will confirm our conversation of yesterday regarding your property located at 55 San Remo Drive. The use proposed for the property is not allowed within the Central District 2 area. The prior use "Lift Tech" was a non -conforming use which relocated to Ethan Allen Drive in mid February 1993. Under Section 19.006 "no non -conforming use may resume if the use has been abandoned for a period of six months". Enclosed is a copy of Section 19.00 Non -conforming uses for your review. The entire San Remo Drive block is zoned Central District. Your property is designated Central District 2. I have also enclosed a copy of the permitted and conditional uses for that area. Be advised that any change of use to the property requires site plan approval by the Planning Commission. Until approvals are secured from the City, occupying the building would be a direct violation of the City's zoning regulations. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Encls RW/mcp 19--C,41v�tY/ A lf-� /,:?� / tax . � -I� .. o� w SOUTH BURLINOTOh ZONINO NOTICE In accordance with ft South Burlington Zonlnl Reggulations and Chapte 117, Title 24, V.S.A. th1 South Burlington Zoninc Board of Adjustment wll hold a public hearing a the South Burlington Mu nicipal Offices, Confer ence Room, 575 Dorse Street, South Burlington Vermont on Monday, Jan uary 10, 1994 at 7:00 P.M to consider the following: #1. Appeal of Stever Whittlesey seeking apppro val from Section 19.6! Multiple Uses of the South Burlington Zonin£ Regulations. Request I; for permission to occuP an existing structure watt approximately 5,20( square feet of retail use 6,600 square feet of stor- age area and 4,50( square feet as a billiarc parlor, located on a lol containing 43,750 square feet, located at 55 San Remo Drive and 358 Dor- set St. #2. Appeal of Harry and Sally Majarian seeking ap- proval from Section 9.20 Conditional uses, Sub section 9.202 Day Care and Section 19.65 Mul- tiple uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for per- mission to operate a day care center (1,375 square feet) with a mazimum of 20 children in conjunction with two residential units, on a lot containingg app- proximately 24,000 square feet, located at 1475 Williston Road. #3., Appeal of Brad Rabi- nowitz, Architect seeking variances from Section 18.00, Area, Density and Dimensional Require- ments and Section 19.104b, Front Yards of the South Burlington Zon- ing Regulations. Request is for permission to allow 6,800 square foot retail building to project 12 feet into the required 50 foot front yard setback and to allow front yard coverage to exceed the 30% maxi- mum by 12% on a 0.62 acre lot located at 1087 Williston Road. Plans are on file with the South Burlington Planning and Zoning Office, lo- cated at City Hall, 575 Dorset Street, South Bur- lington, Vermont. Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Of- ficer December 24, 1993 1 QCA111TC1 V CDCC 9 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 29, 1993 Mr. Phil Kiley Burlington Billards 358 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Appeal Dear Mr. Kiley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, December 13, 1993 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your request for a conditional use approval. Please plan to attend and be prepared to address the criteria enclosed. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative officer 1 Encl RW/mcp City of �th Burlington Application to Board of Adjustment Official Use APB CATION # Date Zl— 23-93 Applicant R IP Lr� a'w`n`er, lessee agent Address,sb'" �a2 �T S?,e T' Telephone # HEARING DATE FILING DATE FEE AMOUNT Landowner X), ��, 71� xc Address 30G Sc�,s�T T�C'cre7 Location and description of property 3S E 501-�,Se % Tleec-7' Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer( ✓)request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question 4E,0.A7-/0ti DF A a Asr, I L I Reason for appeal The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and any other additional information which will serve as support evidence to the Board. Hearing Date ignaturq,7'of Appellant ------------------------ Do not writ below this line -------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Day of Week at to consider the following: Month a,���D�a/ate r � Time L�l JAp P e a 1 o f / ; �wC fLr"'�_y /1��. G (� `i.�L/ ��Gtic c-L/ J seeking ;W from Section j__/ $"I of the South Burlington.Zoning Regulations. R quest.is for permission 2- C) 6vt d - 41 x 81 Fm TABLE rod2TABLi W:Tc fe CMPM 'BURLINGTON BILLARDS 358 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 6-25-92 FU t7 z, ,j was w" 1/811 -1 Fr. ME- 1 4 i :,ANL! HiLL R"�AD fun 1 house c D ff [a] Fo COND. COND. LAI- fE 31W.0, L 00d .8 x ZA" m" mm Al KILEY, Phil 358 Dorset Street d.b.a. Burlington Billiards Area zoned Central District 2. Section 1.101 Permitted use, retail (see letter dated April 29, 1992). Section 1.20 Conditional uses, sub section 1.201 Restaurants, walk-in and sit down, sub section 1.205 Taverns. Section 19.65 Multiple use, (Conditional use Section 19.05). Existing use billiard parlor/pro shop, retail use. Proposed use restaurant/lounge (capacity 20 seats), snack bar and beverages. s r A f September 4, 1969 A. C. Hathorne 35F Dorset Street South I'lurlin-ton, VT 051F0I Attention: IS. i,!. !vhittlesey Dear 'Ir. '.11hittlesey, This isto notify OtifY You that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment aproved your request for a variance on September, 1969 with the stipulation that you meet the fifty (50) 1 foot set back on San Remo Drive an(! maintain an e--'ghu'-- U) foot side yard. I have discussed the use regulation with I-Ir. LeClair and he saw no violation to the zoning ordinance. 'v You will be required to meet all other zonL , re- quirements. nfY. Very truly, R'ichard '-,'ard Code Officer RV August 29, 1969 A. C. hathorne 35P Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 ,Ih Attention: S - 14. '.- ittlesey Dear mIr. ',.,Tiittjcsoy: This is to notify you that the South -i)urlington Zoning Pbardd-of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the L)'Outh Ilurlin -ton high Schooll Cafeteria II on September 3, 1969 at 7:30 p.m., to consider your request for a variance. Very truly, Hichard 11,,;ard Code Of.ficer 111,!/ j August 14, 1969 Mr. Albert I. Reynolds South Burlington Zoning Board South Burlington, Vermont Gentlemen: In view of another unavoidable commitment for Wednesday evening, August 20, 1969, would it be possible to postpone the hearing on my petition until September? If a post- ponement would be inconvenient let me know and I'll make it somehow. incerely yours, ephen M. Whittlesey a v y, r ,z _ Y Fearing Date'" 2 Advt. Date-�- / ��� Advertisa 6 days =-- priar to rrieeting South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment South Burlington, Vermont Gentlemen: I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following variance. I understand that regular meeting dates are the first and third Wednesdays of the month at 7:30 p.m. at the Town Office Building. The legal advertisement shall appear as below, and I agree to pay, either now or before the ad appears., a fee of $30.00, which fee is to Affset . costs of, hpljoingsai4 hearing. v ess 624'e-/Zi I y 6 Date SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE The South Burlington Zoning Board. of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the Town Office Building, 555 Dorset Street' South Burl.ingtony, Vermont on 41 I zl�_— 411a-� --o..1 /96 Y at jo --,, day of weel;4- h and date) Mime to consider the following: j Appeal of zle— 1.�, /,G�xx �Ar—���seeking a variance from kname ) Section F L/c' � u-,— ?numberr(titl7'of section) South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. Request is for permission .-I- �. of the to �f ZONING BO,LRD OF ADJUST111E 1T 4/- TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 555 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VER14ONT Date Dear Citizen: On the reverse side of this sheet is a copy of a legal notice that is to appear in the Burlington Free Press. The Board of Selectmen has instructed that this form be sent to adjacent property oimers as a method of advising them of a public bearing that could or could not affect their property. This is not intended to mean that they are either in favor of or against the requests but is merely furnished for your informa- tional purposes, Very truly yours Zoning Adrilinistrator RW/j 4940 STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TELEPHONE (802) 660-2555 FAX (802) 660-2552 STEVEN F. STITZEL OF COUNSEL, PATTI R. PAGE* ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ADAM E. BRIDGE June 6 1991 SHELLEY A. HILL** I (*ALSO ADMITTIA) IN N.Y.) (**ALSO AIIMI'1"1UI) IN N.H.) Mr. Joseph Weith, Planner South Burlington Offices 575 Dorset Street south Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Jeffrey Myers and Michael Blow Dear Joe: Enclosed please find a letter we received from Attorney Norm Blais, who represents Mr. Myers and Mr. Blow. Apparently they were denied approval for a convenience store at 358 Dorset Street in 1983, and are a bit upset at the recent approval for South Burlington Realty to put in a convenience store at 364 Dorset. I would appreciate it if you could find the file from 1983 for Mr. Myers' and Mr. Blow's application. Then give me a call so I can arrange to review the materials. Thanks, and please call if you have any questions. Very t r U 1 7 yours, e Aam E. Bridg� r�i✓ j/ j sb Enclosure L:\SON506.let LAW OFFICES BLAIS, CAIN, KELLER & FOWLER, INC. NORMAN R. BLAIS 289 COLLEGE STREET, BURLINGTON, VEIWONT 05401 JOHN P. CAIN MARK J. KELLER SUSAN L. FOWLER May 17, 1991 Steven F. Stitzel, Esq. Stitzel & Page, P.C. 171 Battery Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 RE: Claims of Jeffrey Myers and Michael Blow against the City of South Burlington Dear Steve: TELEPHONE 863-1028 FACSIMILE 864-8176 AREA CODE 802 I am taking the liberty of writing to you in your capacity as legal counsel for the City of South Burlington; if the issues raised by this letter do not fall within the aegis of your authority, I would ask that you send it on to the appropriate city official for a response. In the latter part of 1983, my clients Jeffrey Myers and Michael Blow applied for zoning approval for their intended convenience store to be located at 358 Dorset Street. Zoning approval was necessary for the liquor license application which my clients had pending (they intended to sell beer and wine at the store, along with foodstuff.) The Zoning Board rejected their application because of the claimed effect that their little store would have on the traffic on Dorset Street. While not expressly stated in the Board's determination, it was clear by the nature of the questions posed by its members that they were all concerned about the presence of a convenience store so near the high school. My clients are now informed that the Planning Commission has approved a similar proposal by South Burlington Realty to use a location at 364-368 Dorset Street for the same use for which my clients had been denied. I have been supplied with the minutes of the April 23, 1991 of the Planning Commission meeting, and those minutes confirm my clients' concerns. From the information available to me, the only difference between the Myers/Blow application which was rejected and the Munson application which was approved is the applicant. If that is borne out by the facts, it is my opinion that my clients have a valid cause of action against the City for invidious and discriminatory practices, as well are being the targets of capricious and arbitrary action by the City. Steven F. Stitzel, Esq. May 17, 1991 Page 2 While my clients are prepared to commence litigation immediately, I have asked that we first give the City the opportunity to respond to this situation which, on its face, seems very suspicious. I would therefore appreciate it if you could get back to me within a reasonable time so that I can advise my clients with respect to their remedies. Thank you for your attention to this letter. NRB:kl cc: Jeffrey Myers Michael Blow Very truly yours, BLAIS, CA-7N, KELLER & FOWLER, INC. By: Norman R. Blais RECEIVE MAY 2 0 IV Stitzel & Page, K4 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The South Burlington Zoning Roarr3 of Monday, Nehruary 13, 1984 at 5: T'.M., D 575 orset :Street. Members Present FEBRUARY 1984 Adjustment held a regular meetin,a on in the conference room, City Hall, Donald, Graff, Tames Thibault, John Dinklage, Alex Guyette, lames McCl.ary Members Absent Fred Blais, Norman Campbell Others Present Richard Ward, Zoning; Administrator; Hal. Bensen; Madeline Yandow; ,John Crable; Bob Solomon; Lloyd. Kranz; Mike Blow; .Jeffry Myers; Norm Blais; Michael Dumont; .Jim McCann No. 1 Appeal of Steve Whittlesey Appeal of Steve Whittlesey, •Jeffrey Myers agent, seeking a variance from Section 17.10, Permitted uses, traffic overlay district, request is for permission to occupy an existing structure as a convenience store containing 4276 square feet of retail floo• area, at 358 Dorset Street. Mr. Want stated the area is zoned C-2. According to Section 12.10 it is a permitted use. Sub section 12.107 allows the sale of dry goods, variety merchan- dise ana undries. However, Section 17.10 with the permitted use in the traffic overlay district, and this being a zone five, one being the highest and five I>ein�; the lowest, only 45 trip ends are permitted per peak hour per 40,000 square feet lot. They have about half of that with 21,000 square feet of lot and 200 feet of frontage. They say based on a similar operation there will be 234 trips which is an unperkitted use. It mu§t be equal to or'less than 45 trips per hour. The total building is 7776 square`febt. The proposed retail area is 4276 square feet. The'rest will be used as storage. Traffic reports from an existing store at Tafts corners were studied by the board. They were give another report taken from a two day traffic count in front of the building in-uPstion. Norm Blais, speaking from the applicant brought out the point twice that this operation would not bring cars to Dorset Street as many of the existing businesses in that area do, but would be existing cars already traveling Dorset Street, that would be stopping at his clients store. Mr. Dinklage expressed concern that once the permit was granted that they could later turn it into a bottle redemption center. Mike Blow said this would be impossible because there wasn't enough space for this type of operation. Mr. Dinklage stated he didn't feel this was the type of business he would like to see in this area. The appeal was denied on a unanimous vote. Date Received e'� ) - ir !/ By 9-�t Date Application Completed and Received By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVI91 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record ,..5 -66 C/I/ &N17'T-Ze&F- Z (b) Applicant �j ff-,' /4y6e S /V/C#1�66 /, 6(/j (c) Contact Person 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: S'J (�, �, T cj 7- 3) PROPOSED USE (S) : t Cj/V f 710,C?C C D6761 4) SIZE OF PRQ7L]CT (i.e., # of.units, floor area, etc.) / 17coJ/c- 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 6) COST ESTIMATES: �l (a) Buildings (b) Landscaping (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT CaIPLETION DATE Y q 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) SEE 7ZW �i IC 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION DATE January 17, 1984 Mr. Jeffery Myers 129 Russell Street Winooski, Alerrront 05404 F:e: 358 Dorspt, Street Dear MT. Plyers: Having reviewed the traffic data submitted to this office on January 16, 1984 by Mr. James McCann, involving a use (convenience store) for the former Acme property on Dorset Street. I offer the following cc=,ents: City's zoning regulations indicate your proposed use would generate more trips during the peak hours, than permitted by our zoning regulations. The lot in question contains 21,000 square feet which is approximately fifty (50) per cent of the minin=,lot size required. The permitted peak hour trips for the property in question would be 24 trips, the report based on a actual count of a Williston convenience store generates 234 trips. The size of your proposed store is double that of the Williston store. Based on the data submitted by Mr. McCann prepared by Trudell Engineering and a ocg-tVaLison to South Burlington zoning regulations I find that you would be required to obtain a variance from the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Enclosed please find an application for a appeal, the next Zoning Board hearing is scheduled for February 13, 1984. The application must be filed by January 25, 1984. 1 have enough prints, therefore only the application and hearing fee must be submitted. Because of the 7,oning, issue, site plan review will not be scheduled on January 24, 1984. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1*11mog 1 Encl SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance wilt the South Our. lington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Titles 4 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, Febn`ary 13, 1984, at 5:00 P.M. to consider the following: 01 Appeal of Steve Whittlesey, Jeffrey Myers, agent seeking a varionce, from Section 17.10, Permitted uses, traffic overlay district of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for per- mission to occupy on existing structure as a convenience store containing 4276 sgam feet of retail floor area, at 358 Dorset Street. 02 Appeal of Harold B. Benson seeking a variance, from Section 11.10, Permitted uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to con. struct twenty 1201 residential units on a parcel containing 3.7 acres in conjunction with two existing office complexes, at 65 Potchen Rood and 1 Executive Drive. M3 Appeal of •John Crobbe, Jr. seeking a variance, from Section 18.1 O, Dimensional require- ments, subsection 18,104 of rho South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest is for parmission to con- struct a 30 h. x 45 ft. single family dwelling to within thirty- one (31) feet of Interstate 89, at lot k 119 Oakwood Drive. M4 Appeal of Mary Dumont, Frederick Blois, annt seeking a variance, from Section 189 , Dimensional requirements of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to convert - an existing dwelling into a two family unit on a lot containing j l0, l y0 square feet at 2 Prouty Parkway. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer January 28, 1984 .Jel Name, GNOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT address and telephone # of applicant 11 FF.l�Ej� ��%��� SAS"c Name, address of property owner Property location and description 3,S_8. oDO256-T 5 So' 1��,2Myyi as�d f I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice.a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date Sig ature f ppe lant Do not write below this line ----------------------- --------------------------=------------------------------------ - SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on";00P0'%/, at 47'0""w. (day of� e7 (month and date) time to consider the following: Appeal of f - - x seeking a ; ' t .� ra , from Section 171 " I " - '.�-+'° i of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to DATE TIME NORTHBOUND 2/8/84 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. 1G6 2/8/84 4:30 - 5:30 P.m. 228 2/0'/84 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. 212 2/9/84 4:30 - 5:30 P.m. 249 STOPPED SOUTHBOUND TOTAL AT STORE % 255 451 19 4.2% 250 478 17 3.5% 296 508 21 4.1% 235 484 19 3.c,% TOTAL PERCENTAGE 15.7/ AVERAGE PERCENTAGE 3.9% January 31, 1984 Mr. Steve Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. !,Ihittlesey- Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of I%djustnient will hold a public hear inq at the City Hall Conference Room, tbriday, FeLluary 13, 1984 at 5:00 P.M. to consider the request of Mr. Blav and ltjers for prop.rty located at 358 Dorset Street. Please plan to attend this mi-etinq. very truly, I<ichard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Rw/mccj cc: Mr. Michale Blow WHITI'LESEY 358 Dorset Street Area zoned C-2 District Section 12.10 Permitted uses, sub section 12.107 allows use (sale of dry goods, variety merchandise and sundries) Section 17.10 Permitted uses. Traffic Overlay District zone 5, permits 45 trip ends per peak hour per 40,000 square foot lot Lot 125x168 = 21,000 square feet Minimum lot in C-2 district, 40,000 square feet with 200' frontage Total building 7776 square feet Ptoposed',retail area 4276 square feet Review traffic report The report based on actual count of a Williston convenience store generates 234 trips. Williston store is in shopping center and is approximately 2000 square feet February 15, 1984 Mr. Jeffery Myers 1.29 Russell Street Winooski, vermont 05404 Re: 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Myers: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment has denied your request for a zoning variance. The Board major findings is that the traffic within the area exceeds guide lines setforth by City regulations. 'he Board will issue formal findings at a later date. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer TRAFFIC REPORT FOR CONVENIENCE MARKET AT 358 DORSET STEEET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. This report is prepared to estimate the traffic impact of a proposed convenience market at 358 Dorset Street in South Burlington. The building size is 7776 sq. ft. of which 4276 sq. ft. will be utilized as the convenience store with the remainder as storage. Short counts were conducted at this location for the present Dorset Street traffic on Friday January 6, 1984.and Tuesday, .January 10, 1984 between the hours of 7 and 9 AM and 4 and 6 PM. The AM and PM peak hour counts were found to be 372 and 434 northbound; 300 and 474 southbound. The traffic that was generated by the former tenant is estimated by ITE Code 816 to be 40 trips in both the AM and PM peak periods. The estimated trip generation for the convenience market using ITE Code 851 would be 1379 trip ends. There is insufficient data in that ITE Code to establish the peak hours rates for a convenience store. To estimate the peak ,.our rates, a convenience store and deli located at Tafts Corner was selected as similar to this proposal. The Taft Corner store has 2400 sq. ft. of area. This would generate daily traffic of 773 in accordance with Code 851.. The noon and evening peak counts at the Taft Corner location were 130 and 142 trip ends, or approximately 1.7% of the daily traffic. Using an estimate of 17%, the proposed store would generate 234 trip ends during the peak hour. Transportation Research Circular #212 was used to determine if these cars could be accomodated by the existing flow on Dorset Street. The maximum capacity based on conflicting volumes and the critical gaps for 30 mph speeds are 600 VPH for right hand turns and 225 VPH for left turns. The proposed drive would operate at level of service C. TRAFFIC COUNT ON DORSET STREET TIME 1-6-84 1-10-84 1-13-84 Traffic generated by Convenience Market at Taft Corners NB SB NB SB NB SB (J & J Groceries Deli) 7:00 - 7:15 A.M. 37 50 - - 7:15 - 7:30 52 51 55 57 7:30 - 7:45 95 74 83 69 Trip Entering_ 7:45 - 8:00 120 99 129 109 8:00 - 8:15 87 73 65 61 8:15 - 830 76 49 79 66 8:30 - 8:45 94 62 93 44 8:45 - 9:00 101 73 90 52 `-- 9:00 - 9:15 - - 63 37 Jan. 13, 1984 11:30 -11:45 A.M. - - 13 11:45 - 12:00 114 99 10 12:00 - 12:15 135 99 21 12:15 - 12:30 133 106 8 12:30 - 12:45 113 99 13 12:45 - 1:00 125 122 13 1:00 - 1:15 9 1:15 - 1:30 8 4:00 - 4:15 P.M 121 128 80 75 4:15 - 4:30 146 133 78 96 Jan. 5, 1984 4:30 - 4:45 130 124 84 93 19 4:45 - 5:00 126 149 98 103 17 5:00 - 5:15 117 143 83 101 16 5:15 - 5:30 126 128 80 102 19 5:30 - 5:45 123 93 72 84 5:45 - 6:00 54 108 61 98 T 14 Z � h 14f O r % � tifCr / f Sa \ \ 40 i t B4` S-BURLINGTON - (PCP 30,633) _ N 8 y $ W I N 0 0 S A �. (A N ) � CENTrAL rEFrOrt •'` � - v �munSIX � (� l a � tOM�NO R 8eacN �P Fqp T 1,��.� `/ 71 4ETr <V \ -�In 0 \ SA s4 — Io' r \ FAS 1♦I c' j1 ca FAv Sq D \ y 03 2 p BURLINGTON, MUNICIPAL uaP \\ s III i 07 F4A, RoOseV" �p�4T1�J YERMONT/ \ ¢ y �Q; 4R NATIONAL 01 M i3 FA m 0 A / 9 FC4 S4 r. S ;O,H 1 C•i 1/! QNt!!1 C.Ity 3 SN[LDURN[ REO ROCK' ': Por. "' k54 L B U R L I N G T 0 N . }. \� Z ,l SAS POP. 10,032)In 116 Rio 0 G EEEE����----I • I � I( \� i m PHEASA)BT • a W •'� ` HILL ' : r r SA Joe N HIGHWAYS BUILC �---�� wlrlt[D MIBMMA. STATE MIaMNAT SIST9. Inuv s� � JrL r - STAT! A10 Mlar■AT SnT1:Y SAN S7A7E AID ENDS T_NN M,S,I■aT S/St!• C c c = ❑ IYIASSA DLt 0■ UN/RATt LED ADA0 =v v= •RIVaT[ Ro►OtTICRt S.C. sgv.%,%61 r ---It -- 100T TRAIL 1:5a :MTEASTAT[ NU■SEREO ROUT♦ • Mur1ER(0 NOVTE ` IS116 s7471 NUMBERED ROUTt a FAP r[DERAL Alt IRI■AQT "]"VAT STSTEY • a FAS FEDERAL Alt stco,taR• MIGNrI• STiit■ i 6 FAS \ FK*PIAL AIO SECONORA'T Mil ♦ 1U OINTERCMANCE NUMBER i ��= rit[A G! aET■[tr AMOr3 � i ' BNIoaE 0R autvt RT (Lt53 TMAN i IPAMI f c BRIOGE OR GMIRE T I O TNRU IV SPAS) ®• as'pst U0.1' ?RAW EC'sIAR) — � 541061 (0v ER 20'S1AN) El DRArCR10G( i ^ - STEEL TRUSS BMOC( 0 —� COT[Nto BAIOGE CAUSErAT • CATTLE rasa • GR►0[ caa SflrG • UND[RrASl f o•crrats • sTDTt SURFACE TYPES 0!re.ROAD BMENNOb� BITUMINOUS r4, MACADAM MIX. MACADAM i PENETRATION, CONCnc TL. BITUMINOUS CONCRETE, BRICK OR BLOCK Y e sumac( TRtATto GR►•cL L CRArEL o SOIL SVR/AGC 1(•D CLASS GRAVEL) CRACK* AND ORAINtO tARTM • vrlrr AOv[D _. i . OTHER TRANSFORTATION MISGEt. NAILRt.o ARO STATION "N►ORT {COMPLt•! FACI117451 4 -- (, AIR/CRT (LI■ITCO FACILITIES) 0 1 0 AIRPORT (MILITANT) a T g LANDING AAEA X T" O SEAPLANt BASt v I L SESPLArt ArCMOtAGE 0 Q AIR■A• 0[ACON ® [. •T GR NA010 RANGC $741I40 L� 5' * LISMTMOUS! - -- ■t AO OF ■AVIGATION ISEASONALI ' ® m - -�-. •.L ter~ tr r r] Description: The hardware or paint store is gener- ally a freestanding building with its own park- ing lot. The average size store surveyed was approximately 28,000 gross square feet of building spaceon a 2.6 acre parcel of land, with an average employment of 27 people. Trip Characteristics: Trip generation rates were calculated on the basis of employment, 1,000 square feet of gross floor area and acres. As indicated on the following tables, the average 816 -- Hardware/Paint Store weekday vehicle trip ends generation rate was measured at 53.2 per employee, 51.3 per 1,000 gross square feet and 546 per acre. These stores generally peak at different hours than the ad- jacent street traffic. Saturday and Sunday have higher generation rates than weekdays. Data Limitations: Only three sites were measured. Therefore more data would be desirable to more accurately define these rates. New 1979 e SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Hardware/Paint Stork ITE Land Use Code 816 Independent Variable —Trips per 1- 000 Grog a Sauare Feet Average Trip Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 51.3 4 43.63 2 7.7 Peak Hour of A.M. Between 7 and 9 Enter Exit Total �q1 2 7.7 Adjacent Street Traffic P.M. Between 4 and 6 Enter Exit Total 7.4 27.7 Peak Hour of A.M. Enter Exit Total Generator P.M. Enter Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total 11.2 114. 10 . 27.7 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends TM__ 87 , �� 64.0 27.7 Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total 82 , Source Numbers q0 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1979 851--Convenience Market Description: Convenience markets are usually open 15 to 24 hours per day, depending on the man- agement and possibly the location. These stores are usually several thousand ;gross square feet in size. Trip Characteristics: Data from only five studies in Delaware were obtained. These were grouped for the stores which were open 15-16 hours and for those operating on a 24-hour basis because the generation rates reflected that type of grouping. Only average weekday vehicle trip ends data were reported and summarized on the following tables. Data Limitations: Measurements at more of these establishments are necessary to establish a data base for estimating trip generation rates. F] __ S ,� \/\■ «� � 1T Kr t - - k6 F'... �i. �; � �. F` L r SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type _.15=16Lli ucxuencc--Market -- ITE Land Use Code _ 85-1.� Independent Variable ---Trips per __ 1,000 Gross Square Feet e16 000 7-Trip Average Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 322.E 1 351.7 293.6 2 Peak Hour of A.M. Between 7 and 9 Enter Exit Total Adjacent Street Traffic P.M. Between 4 and 6 Enter Exit Total Peak f Hour of A.M. Enter i— Exit Total Generator P.M. Enter Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends __— Peak Hour of Generator Enter__.._ ------- ---- Exit Total Source Numbers _ 78 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation dates Date: 1975 �� 'A � '� ,�,�••� _ - - - ' ~. /�'� Cam` — -,Po-le 00, PLANNING COMMISSION 4 JUNE 1991 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday 4 June 1991, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Catherine Peacock, David Austin, Terry Sheahan, William Craig Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Carl Lisman, Hal Bensen, Bill Thompson, Val & Enid Kupiec, Barbara Pell, Madeline Yandow, Rita Airoldi, Gretchen & Vernon Wamsganz, Ethel Goldstein, Scott' Smiht, Joseph Randazzo, Mildred Estey, Ed Gravel, Brian Lane, Attilio 'Bonfanti, Lloyd Kranz, Stephen Whittlesy, John Steele, Greg Rabideau, John Larkin 1. Other Business: Mr. Weith noted the Deslauriers will be coming in for approval to operate a driving range and small mini -golf facility. The property is approved for recreational use but they are going to open it to the public. Mr. Weith said he felt it was an expansion of use and required Commission approval. Ralph Deslauriers, Jr., asked if they could set up a driving range now for members use only. Members said it would be OK as long as it was made clear it was for members use only. Mr. Weith and Mr. Burgess noted that at last night's City Council meeting, Councilmen decided to warn a second public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan for 24 June and to go ahead with the proposed plan with the addition of wording that says that the Southeast Quadrant is under interim zoning and when new zoning is complete, the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan will be brought into concurrence. 2. Minutes of 16 Apri 1 1991 Mr. Craig moved to approve the Minutes of 16 April as printed. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Site Plan application of Attilio bonfanti for use of an existing building for discount food store use (4,000 sq. ft.), sales, rental and maintenance of fork lifts (9,700 sq. ft.) and 4,000 square feet of vacant space, 358 Dorset Street. Mr. Whittlesey said the building was built in 1960 to house a roofing company. Acme Glass then used it, then Century Lighting until last year. The last 2 uses didn't generate much traffic. The back of the building houses Liftech Co. which has no retail PLANNING COMMISSION 4 June 1991 page 2 business at all and almost no traffic. There is a fence that separates the rear and front parts of the building. Mr. Bonfanti said his daughter will run the new business. He said they don't generate a lot of traffic but attract people who buy in quantity. Mr. Sheahan asked what the paved section next to the lawn is for. Mr. Whittlesey said it used to be a parking area for employees. The new road will cut off 20 ft. of it and he didn't think it would be used for parking any more. Mr. Sheahan asked if it could be made into green space. Mr. Whittlesey said the only reason not to would be a need for additional parking. Mr. Sheahan noted there is no curb cut there and it couldn't be used for parking. Other members agreed they would like to see an extension of green space there. Mr. Craig noted the City Engineer suggested removing the outermost 2 parking spaces and making that area green space as well. It is so close to Dorset St. and there is need for stacking area for at least one car on the property. Members agreed this should be done after the Dorset St. widening. Mr.._Austin,moued_the_PlanninoCommission_a2pr.oveµt�he-Site -Plan -ap^ 12lication=nf;Attilia_Bonfanti _for_use_of-an_existing-building-for discount_food_store- use _t4,.QQQ_e ft-jy-sales,-rental-and-main tenance -of -to rk_lifts��8,3QQ_spµ_ft -and 4rQQQ_sa-_ft�-of -vacant space_as_deiE cted�Qn_a.Plan,entit_led,"358-Dorset-Street,. �Y Whittlesey-Lot,"_-and-ddated_received-5/28/91,-with-the-following stiuulatians;.........-�-.._.._.._..................__.._.._....._ _ ..._ _ .._.._ ..... ..._ 1--Use-of -the _4, 000 _sq-_foat-vacant -space -for -any -purp d*_uaose other than_unusecant-space-shall_require-site-plan-approval-by-the Planning-Commission- -,,,The-plan-shall-be-reui.sedµprior-to-issuanceµof-.a_zoni.npYpernit to_show_theµtwo_t2�_western_most-parking-spaces-eliminated---The nliminatedparkin�-spaces shall-be-replaced-biz-lawn-within-6 months_of_the_substantial_coapletio`e a_µof_the-Dorset_Street-pro ctz -The _revised -plan _shall -al so -_in -indicate shall_he-submitted_to-and,apprQoedµ -the-Cito21aaaer- 3..-The-plan-shall-be-revised-prior-to-permit-to-show-the-front unused -paced -area -removed -and-replaced-with-lawn- 4__The_applicant-shall-post-a-band-in-an-amount-to-be-determined tithe -City -Engineer -and -Planner -to -insure -compliance -with -the requirements-of—stipulations-#2-and-#3- 5--A-zoning-permit -must -be -obta i.nedwwithin-6-months-or-this approval -is -null -and -voidµ PLANNING COMMISSION 4 June 1991 page 3 Ms —Peacock- seconded -the -mot ion -which -the n�oassed_unanimous IV_ 4. Continue discussion on preliminary plat application of Harold Benson for subdivision of a 3.63 acre parcel containing two commercial buildings and 16 residential units into two lots of 1.41 acres (commercial buildings) and 2.22 acres (residential buildings), Patchen Road: Mr. Lisman said he would like time to talk to the City Attorney on the question of whether this should be warned as a new application or an amendment to an old approval. Mr. Austin noted that landscaping is an issue. He felt there is a question of whether this is an amendment of an old approval. Mr. Burgess said the subdivision is a totally new application. Ms. Peacock noted that Mrs. Maher had asked that everything growing on the site be charted. Mr. Weith said there is different landscaping from that which was approved. He said the two issues were landscaping and screening of the dumpster and that the ap- plicant was asked to come up with an application that addressed these issues. Mr. Lisman said when a hearing is warned, these issues will be addressed. Mr- _Craig m9ued_toµcontinue_the-applicati.on4unti1-9�iul Sheahan -seconded _-_MoLion_Passed-unanimousl r� 5. Continue discussion on preliminary plat application of Charles Desluriers for a planned commercial development consisting of 218,800 sq. ft. of general/medical office space including a cafe/ deli, a pharmacy and two shops in 6 buildings on 12.35 acres, 421 Dorset Street: Ralph Deslauriers said they have owned the land since the early '50's. Zoning on the parcel is as follows: the front 3 acres is CD-3, the back parcel was C-2 but was changed to R-7. In May, 1988, the Commission felt the project shouldn't be done until the Dorset St. widening is completed. The plan is for six 2-story buildings. Some of the buildings have been moved further away from nearby homes and also have been reduced in size. There is a 50 ft. right-of-way from Sherry Rd. There will be a signalized intersection opposite the southern part of San Remo Drive. The frontmost building will be 10 ft. from dorset St. There will be a landscaped area in the center of the buildings. Coverage require- ments have been met. Mr. Deslauriers noted there was concern over the proximity of the projectof homes in back. Buildings have been moved from 30 ft. 6/4/91 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of Attilio Bonfanti for use of an existing building for discount food store use (4,000 square feet), sales, rent -_al and m--i1.ntenance of furl- l l.ft s (9,700 sqi-l?re feet) and 4,000 square feet of vacant space as depicted on a plan entitled "358 Dorset street, Whittlesey Lot," and dated received 5/28/91, with the following stipulations: 1. Use of the 4,000 square foot vacant space for any purpose other than unused, vacant space shall require site plan approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning permit to show the two (2) western most parking spaces eliminat- ed. The eliminated parking spaces shall be replaced by lawn, s-ul!ys-eTrt-'•to the completion of the Dorset Street project. The revised plan shall also indicate this. The revised plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner. 3. A zoning permit must be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. r , )Pev s r�� Cevf•4d 14 f— 4//Ohrl Zavwer )SIPfe'O �W/Jvarxs Mr. Randazzo said I personally like the plan. Mr. Chamberland said can you tell me where the hardship is? Mr. DeVarney said the hardship comes in the fact that the lot is a totally different lot than the rest of the neighborhood. Attempts have been made years ago to purchase where Tadisco is. We have also had a land exchange with the Bernadets and the lot appears totally rectangular from the street. Mr. Chamberland said your need to expand has decreased. Mr. DeVarney said it could have been justified years ago with 4 children. Mr. Loso asked is there any change there in terms of closeness to our property? Mr. DeVarney said the addition will come out about 53' from our property line. Mr. Loso said I have no objection to this. The appeal was granted 5 - 1. No. 2 Appeal of Stephen Whittlesey Appeal of Stephen Whittlesey and Attilio Bonfante, seeking approval from Section 1.20 Conditional uses, sub section 1.202 Discount centers and Section 19.65 Multiple use. Request is for permission to operate a discount food center (approximately 4000 square feet) in conjunction with a second retail use (4000 square feet) on a lot containing 19,450 square feet former Century Lighting, 358 Dorset Street. Mr. Ward informed the Board that the area in question is zoned Central District II. Section 1.20 Conditional uses, sub section 1.202 Discount stores. Section 19.65 Multiple use " more than one use per building:. Proposed 4000 square feet discount food center, existing structure 8,000 square feet. Second use unknown at this time. (Suggest administrative review for other use). Lot 120' x 152' = 19,456 square feet. This has been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission as of Tuesday. Planning had no problem with a discount store in general. Mr. Randazzo asked does this fall within the City Center concept? How does our City Center guidelines affect our vote on something like this? Mr. Ward said they put this together two years ago and a development commission was going to be considered but they haven't got that far yet. Mr. Whittlesey has owned this property for many years and it's a Conditional use. There is more for the Planning Commission to do. Right now there are 7 buildings empty there and I think they have been very patient. Mr. Randazzo I'm aggravated that there is no attempt to do this. Mr. Whittlesey said they will be using only a section of this building and I don't think he will be there for that many years. He doesn't expect it will generate a lot of traffic on the street. In Vergennes they have 5 or 6 cars at one time at the most. This building was originally built in 1960. I feel it will not generate any more traffic than Century or Acme Light did. By the same token when we put up that building in 1960, the high school wasn't there, the city center wasn't there, the fire station wasn't there and then other things -3- happened and it changed the whole attitude towards Dorset St. The City is very happy to pick up our taxes and now they think those buildings are an eyesore. I have injected a lot of money in those buildings and it's hard to sweep them out of the way. It would be a real hardship to try to change this. Mr. Bonfante would have a business that won't hurt the neighborhood at all. He wants to use elderly people in his work force. I don't see any problems in using this for a Discount center. He will be using the front half of that building and we will see how much traffic will develop before we accept someone else for the back part of the building. Mr. Randazzo asked is this like a warehouse? Mr. Whittlesey replied yes, packages that have a lot of units. in them where some might get damaged in traffic and those that can be salvaged would be there to sell. Mr. Blais asked what kind of lease term do you have? Mr. Whittlesey said we've only given an option on it. It probably won't be for more than a year. Mr. Blais asked Planning wasn't unhappy about this? Mr. Ward said no. Mr. Whittlesey said they cut 20' off my lot for the bike path and sidewalks. They asked for no stacking out in the road when we come to rent the back section. Mr. Chamberland asked will this affect the character of the neighborhood? Mr. Blais said it wouldn't affect the neighborhood. Mr. Johnson said I would like to make the motion that if this is approved that for the second use or second tenant a review is required before this Board Before it's allowed I would also like to have an Administrative Review in one year's time of this use if this is approved This was seconded by Mr. Randazzo and all voted aye. The appeal was granted unanimously as stipulated. No. 3 Appeal of Brian and Annette Benedict Appeal of Brian and Annette Benedict, seeking a variance from Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements and Section 19.00 Non -conforming structures. Request is for permission to replace an existing garage with a 22'x 26' detached garage to within three (3) feet of the westerly side yard, located at 4 Iby Street. Mr. Ward informed the Board that the area in question is R-4 District. Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements, minimum side yard 10 feet, proposed westerly side yard 3 feet, existing 20' x 22' garage to be replaced with 22' x 26'. Existing garage non -complying structure (Section 19.00 Non conforming structure, sub section 19.002). Lot 71' x 135' = 9585 square feet. This is already non -conforming on the 3' side yard. Mr. Benedict I have considered repairing the garage one side wall at a time. I had someone come in to look at it and the existing garage is on blocks and the building has slipped off the blocks and is rotted on the bottom and the roof cannot be replaced. The garage will then be 7' behind my existing deck. -n A I s4n,":-kA0(7,R-- N °''S -L 07 I i J..::) ---j �4, i laS?JOd 73aiE y.0-/ City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 31, 1991 Mr. Attilio Bonfanati 214 North Avenue, Apartment D Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Discount Food Store, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Bonfanati: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also en- closed are Bill Szymanski's and Jim Goddette's comments. Please be sure someone is present. on Tuesday, June 4, 1991 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, JAoe Weith, K-I� City Planner Encls JW/mcp cc: Stephen Whittlesey Lloyd Kranz W-d TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 1. 2. �nttt tirliniattin Zaire +?fie portm mt _i7� �nr�et �itrcrt �vtttb +6iirlingtun, licrntnrit ll-'140 , (802) 658-7960 SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE TUESDAY JUNE 4,1991 AGENDA ITEM THURSDAY MAY 30, 1991 L&M PARK SHELBURNE ROAD PLAN DATED MAY 23,1991 THE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THE OVERALL PROJECT BUT BEFORE THE FINAL APPROVAL THE WATER SYSTEM AND HYDRANT SYSTEM MUST BE COMPLETED FOR APPROVAL. 358 DORSET STREET WHITTLESEY LOT PLAN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, BUT IF ANY CHANGES ARE DONE TO THE BUILDING IN OR OUTSIDE THEN PLANS MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY STATE OF VERMONT TO MAKE SURE THE BUILDING MEETS CODE FOR SAFETY FOR THE PUBLIC. 3. HAL BENSEN PROPERTY SUBDIVISION PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR OUR DEPARTMENT. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: June 4, 1991 agenda items Date: May 31, 1991 3) STEVE WHITTLESEY PROPERTY. 258 DORSET STREET 1. First two parking spaces should be eliminated and front lawn extended. It will be very difficult to enter and exit from those spaces especially after Dorset Street widening is completed. 2. Plan dated May 5, 1991 is acceptable. 4) HAL BENSEN, 2 LOT SUBDIVISION. PATCHEN ROAD Plan dated May 8, 1990 prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors is acceptable. 6) L & M PARK. (REVISION) SHELBURNE ROAD The parking lots for the theater and hotel should be tied togeth- er so entrance and exit can be made from either drive as in the original plan. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: June 4, 1991 agenda items Date: May 31, 1991 3) WHITTLESEY. DISCOUNT FOOD STORE, 358 DORSET STREET This project consists of using the front half (4,000 square feet) of an 8,000 square foot building at 358 Dorset Street for a dis- count retail food store. 2,000 square feet of the space to be leased will be used as retail floor area. The previous tenant was Century Lighting which left the premises in March, 1990. The remaining 4,000 square feet will remain vacant and will need approval from the Planning Commission when a use is found. This building is attached to another building on this same lot which projects easterly and fronts on San Remo Drive. This building is occupied by Liftech which operates a business sell- ing, renting and repairing fork lifts. This property is in the Central District 2 zone and is bounded on the north by Champlain Oil, on the south by South Burlington Realty (office and discount beverage store), on the west by Dorset Street and on the east by San Remo Drive. Access: The Dorset Street portion of the lot is presently served by one (1) curb cut and the San Remo Drive portion is served by two (2) curb cuts. There is no direct access across the lot from Dorset Street to San Remo Drive because of a gate and fence. The Dorset Street improvements will result in the one (1) 35 foot wide curb cut on Dorset Street. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 40% (maximum allowed is 40%). Overall coverage is 77.4% (maximum allowed is 90%). No changes are proposed which would alter these percentages. Setback requirements are not presently met and no changes are proposed which would alter the buildings. This building is therefore a noncomplying structure. Floor Area Ratio: The Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) for this lot is .4 (maximum allowed is .5). This is based on 17,695 square feet of floor space on a 43,700 square foot lot. Landscaping: No improvements to the building are proposed, therefore there is no minimum landscaping requirements. The Dorset Street portion of the property is presently landscaped 1 Memorandum - June 4, 1991 May 31, 1991 Page 2 Planning agenda items with a small lawn in the front with two (2) trees and a grass strip along the northerly boundary between the building and the lot line. Parking: This project requires 10 parking spaces and 13 spaces are shown on the plan. Bill Szymanski has recommended that the two (2) spaces closest to Dorset Street be eliminated (see en- closed memo). Stall dimensions and aisle widths meet minimum requirements. Traffic: This property lies within Traffic Overlay Zone 6 which would allow this lot to generate 49 peak hour trips. The pro- posed use would generate 8 peak hour trips based upon actual counts at a similar store in Vergennes. We do not have data on the Liftech business in regards to peak hour trips. Staff does not feel that it is a high traffic generator which would result in the proposed use and the existing use exceeding the 49 peak hour trips allowed. Other: A discount store is a conditional use in the CD-2 zone. This request will be heard by the Zoning Board of Adjustment at their June 10, 1991 meeting. 4) HAL BENSEN, 2 LOT SUBDIVISION. PATCHEN ROAD This is a continuation of the preliminary plat hearing held on 8/14/90 (minutes enclosed). At this meeting the Planning Commis- sion moved to continue the application pending receipt of further information including a landscaping plan, dumpster screening, etc. No additional information has been submitted. City Attor- ney Steve Stizel has informed me that since no certain date was established when this application was continued, it will need to be rewarned in the paper. Therefore, this meeting will be a discussion only. Harold and Eleanor Bensen propose to subdivide a 3.63 acre parcel into two parcels of 2.22 and 1.41 acres. The parcel contains 16 residential units in 3 buildings (rear of property) and two commercial structures (front portion of parcel near Patchen Road). The subdivision would create a residential lot (2.22 acres) and a commercial lot (1.41 acres). Mr. Bensen plans to convert the existing rental units to condominium ownership. The parcel is zoned C-1. It is bounded on the north by Jaycee Park, on the west and south by commercial uses, and on the east by Patchen Road. Since this subdivision involves commercial 2 :k1urlington ,Fire P. cVart r"t 575 143ursrt �trret '?Lt1IIt "liLirfingtan, 13Prtl'ivltt 05-40-3 (802) 658-7960 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: JUNE 25,1991 AGENDA ITEM DATE: MAY 20,1991 1. 358 DORSET STREET WHITTLESEY LOT PLAN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, BUT IF ANY CHANGES ARE DONE TO THE BUILDING IN OR AUT SIDE THEN PLANS MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY STATE OF VERMONT TO MAKE SURE THE BUILDING MEETS CODE FOR SAFETY FOR THE PUBLIC. M E M O R A N D U M To: Project files From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: June 25, 1991 agenda items Date: May 17, 1991 STEVE WHITTLESEY PROPERTY 358 DORSET STREET 1. First two parking spaces should be eliminated and front lawn extended. It will be very difficult to enter and exit from those spaces especially after Dorset Street widening is complet- ed. 2. Plan dated May 5, 1991 is acceptable. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 21, 1991 Stephen Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Discount Food Store, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Whittlesey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed, please find preliminary comments on the above refer- enced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Goddette and myself. Please submit all information requested at least one (11 week before the Planning Commission meeting. Please contact me if you have any questions. Si cWe',r/ely, A-. Joe Weith, City Planner Encls cc: Attilio Bonfanti JW/mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: Preliminary Comments, June 25, 1991 Agenda items Date: May 17, 1991 BONFANTI DISCOUNT FOOD STORE 358 DORSET STREET Additional information required: square footage of retail floor area site plan must show entire property owned by Mr. Whittlesey the City has determined that .since neither lot (358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive) meets the minimum lot size requirements that both lots are combined into one lot which must therefore be shown on the site plan dimensions of the entire lot must be shown date that Century Lighting ceased operating from the premises information on Liftech Handling business at 55 San Remo Drive including the square footage of floor area devoted to office use, number of non -office employees and the number of company vehicles operating from the premise. description of the Liftech Handling use e 1 .1orq r ,r tro ti o 40' Op', �. ae \44 �. 040- �, \ ,, 17- too 7-A; y7 Iz �'i 'J-., �•'..r _� , � � � �. ,.. ry.•,; '; .� .�� a d} , � � a r•� }� r f h `i�� .� a '��'S. A...3/J � •�'' d Y y 7 '..j; '-T� Y ,t ��� T.+y. X.. � �,.� v�',} 112 {.,M .! � » ♦ `x � 00 77 Li°"s• .; ry �° ,!y„4 �` :.- � �.. \ �wi � 5��a F: U ' I �1" + :: ��� OL�;'�i� f y"�7. ..�- .gip , ,/•�, ��,�,,,5"' • ,,, _�'�` "`� . t4, To: From: Re. Date: M E M 0 E A N D U M Project Files Joe Weith, City Planner Preliminary Comments, June 25, 1991 Agenda items May 17, 1991 BONFANTI DISCOUNT FOOD STORE, 358 DORSET STREET Additional information required: `_- square footage of retail floor area Z site plan must show entire property owned by Mr. Whittlesey the City has determined that since neither lot (358 Dorset Street and 55 San Remo Drive) meets the minimum lot size requirements that both lots are combined into one lot which 3 must therefore be shown on the site plan dimensions of the entire lot must be shown ' date that Century righting ceased operating from the premises M ,_Gj� l q qo information on Liftech Handling business at 55 San Remo Drive including the square footage of floor area devoted to office use, number of non -office employees and the number of company vehicles operating from the premise. r description of the Liftech Handling use G�vv v, V Ce c) J -f�/i5b i /c7 jC' l C'eW S i L"? JDA- 3 /a_� /,wq /'Y7Ile-r c 0 _ + ec t U, h0 b y%' c c�vt�/ c y 11Ie3;_1 ra4l. C I w � m NY �V'rJv' 7 G, �wc� c��-•�� y vJ��,�����p���.. �� � ��� Ste-, ��-: D� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER. OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Stephen Whittlesey, 300 Swift Street, So. Burlington 864-5591 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) s�t'HiIii I,lom ,,i/,,}L 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) (802) 879-6100 Lloyd Kranz c/o The Real Estate Center, Inc.,Two Market P1ace,Essex Jct 05452 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 358 Dorset Street 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S)Multi-Use Building w/front half devoted to the operation of a discount retail food store w/balance of bldq to be leased to a yet to be found tenant (s) . 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) Existingbuilding of 8000 S.F. _ 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES est. 7 full time for 1st tenant (4 at any given time) 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 40 %; landscaped areas_% --building,,. parking, outside storage s_% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ -0- , Landscaping $ -0- Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ Several small signs for handicapped parkina areas will be added. 11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Approx 2 wks after approvals 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 54 Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11712 noon 8 12-1p.m. 8 ; 1-2 p.m. 9 ; 2-3 p.m. 7 3-4 p.m. 6 4-5 p.m. 8 ; 5-6 p.m. 6 ; 6-7 p.m. N/A 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: lla.m.-3p.m, 14 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Fri & Saturdav DATE OP SUBMISSION SIGNATUR OF APPLICANT DATE OF HEARING 1 � PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (11 X 17) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible.) Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. (This requires sepa- rate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 fee.t. by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot #). North arrow Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. 2 //'/ y4)0 35 P0R5'rTS5T: t lied,, Curb S'u,Tj I 11i 1 t� ctJc' 20 Id e4777. Mo Kitv(`_ .� �•7Gi (ICI K �3 � �. A �i /' Y' G • 1 S � 1 (t om 1 ( IF t 1 X_ i0�ovfr. 3 hey{ Jeor 1uN17 i-LcSL `/ L v 16w, h� + 0 7 1991 "ity of So. Burlington �—c fi S d�ltrz l � City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 July 15, 1991 Stephen Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Discount Food Store, 358 Dorset Street Dear :Mr. Whittlesey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the June 4, 1991 Planning Commission meet- ing minutes. Please note the conditions of approval which must be met prior to obtaining the zoning permit. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si erely, oe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Attilio Bonfanti Lloyd Kranz City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 August 14, 1991 Stephen Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Discount Food Store, 358 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Whittlesey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval which must be met prior to obtaining the zoning permit. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincer .ly, Ra d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant 1 Encl RJB/mcp cc: Attilio Bonfanti Lloyd Kranz City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 28, 1991 Mr. Stephen Whittlesey 300 Swift Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 'Zoning appeal Dear Mr. Whittlesey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, June 10, 1991 at 7:00 P.M. to con- sider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1 Encl RW/mcp SOZONING N� CF In accordanceo� IZoning gouth Burlm9 Chapter R0�ulatio 2gnn V.S.A the gg 11 gin urlin mZoWilI South of Adust ► ant Board ublie hearing at hold a P gurlingtGonfer- the SoutOtlices, nicipal m 575 Dorset South guMon ay, ence Roo ' Street. '- on Vermont 1991 at 7:00 � ,1irne 10, r the tol- t p.M, to conside 1 lowing. of Bernard I Appeal DeVarney see g allivariance from andking 00 Dimensio Sectia ea and dhe isouth nal, on of uirem a ulations• Burlington lot Permsslon Request is addition of to construct an 5 square approximately 68 1. and m eghof the teet Lo to t (8,6) one h e yard. Pro- eas- tdcoveragX 81 lo posed the ma lmum ds on a lot feet; to g 73a 0 s uEl zabeth located APPeaI w Street. of Stephen d d� Whittleseseekiog aPPr n gonfa$ectlon 1.2 0 ° ubsection 1 fforn tioral uses,ters scou 19.65 nMul- 1.202Section th gur- tiple use of Rego atlorts 1 Itn9ton for permissio� ' Request is a discount i to °Peienter (arepfeet) d squa ° f tc1�.n ao with a(4e00 and retail use lot cOn square toot) 50 sq L9h�In9 tainI Century 't jor of 358 Dorset Street. APPegBnedlcgtiseeti g Annettand e trom Sec pimenslonal re - a variance $action i q00 ulrement4on cone° Sou h 1g.00 i g�uungt°� of Reg f Russion Requ01ac6 am est26 Be - to in rt chedtgar 9of the Wlehsat threes) yard, located 4 k gtre al of R°hart Ste -I t 41by rove #e S P� eking 19 65 f,Aul- from section the Sou th tiple uses Regina It Buflin Request is to r9Py to phlcs re o tar (aP cenre praodX(mattl e y 1200 5q WRh feet) II conjun6Lio Supply I ess an exlbsu11 o� fflbusstems distr Bus, ss d at 80 d.a' ont. oI Verm Farrell Streaelt•of Lowell 4 eeekin9 apCond iroim Section 11S bsection use' storage of tiona11 Outside Reg 11.2 gurki IOr' for the South Request is ulauons. ° erase a Pern11S51On to p storaBO vehicle motor (aPPrOXin'ately lion yard m con) service vehicles) existing g11' With an located at station, ad. Williston RO Richard Ward, atIV Zoning Admin'str ffj�or May 25, 1g91 - eck \1 lf-,p 0 ice, OvFjetleAP P 0 aj< C ze T- SI-Ar- I i'll'd ti1v IC 1 4 . . ........... ..... .............. f? v V E MAY 2 8 1991 City of So. Burlington p M uIV_s o i/ ,U 7 ` 1 r /e—S'e— ��R,� ��T S � '� Cep• �" �""��/r�� �l I t I � hi C_; v, s rtJC, � � Y cr G e � I tom• ! ell w vt I f 1 r—' 4iin,rnw ,-.I ` i --�Aak,iivN,�c-✓ ate( � c,�as•f I --- f r' _ - . Yr HA tvil-ij- A IV r'- ---' •wrn M.r i t I I i '� 5Cir I I 1 . _ a boy f �.1--. ..•. _ .... may..., :.. •; „• � � . ti I I , -vie- ell yv � �1 1 I i I r !k 'J 1 ' , he.4 J.or �101 vwt,e,l � Vfq I .I rs�tlLe.� I Y WHITTLESEY, Stephen 358 Dorset Street Area in question Central District II. Section 1.20 Conditional uses, sub section 1.202 Disco -Lint stores. Section 19.65 Multiple use "more than one use per building". Proposed 4000 square feet discount food center, existing struc- ture 8,000 square feet. Second use unknown at this time. (Suggest administrative review for other use). Lot 120' x 152' = 19.456 square feet. Official Use APP. 1ATION # City of S '.h Burlington Application to oard of Adjustment Date Applicant Deac Bopfanti Owner, leasee, agent HEARING DATE /,0' FILING DATE II'�,% FEE AMOUNT Address 214 North Avenue, AptD Telephone # 658-0051 Burlington Landowner Stephen HJhittlesey Address 300 Swift Street Location and description of roperty le - Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer.( X )request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question Reason for appeal The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and anv other additional information which will serve as suppor_ evidence to the Board. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this li e ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington.Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at Month and Date Time Appeal of Day of Week to consider the following: seeking tiff c+ ats` - ' from Section /"Zo of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to GfOG:>�= ,.ICI f� � ��� ,..C�+,•v .ot..,..I"L^ r�.�+ ..�wJ ,.,�„,.� L�'-w2+�...gG.,.,r�•, K .r'�...C..-r�;,c.,.,� uj z � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Stephen Whittlesey; 300 Swift Street, So. Burlington 864-559`1 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) m'I(IG 60111(4I`1N-h- I 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address , phone #) (802) 879-6100 L Lloyd Kranz c/o The Real Estate Center, Inc.,T`ao TN7arket Place,Essex Jct 05452 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 358 Dorset Street 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S)Multi-Use Building w/front half devoted to the operation of a discount retail food store w/balance of bldq to be leased to a yet to be found tenant (s) . 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, € units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) Existing building of 8000 S.F. _ 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES est. 7 full time for 1st tenant (4 at any given time) 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 40 %; landscaped areas_% 1uilding, parking, outside storages_% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ -0- , Landscaping $-0 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ Several small signs for handicapped Parking areas will be added. 1 1 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Approx 2 wks after approvals 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 54 Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 8 12-1p.m. 8 ; 1-2 P.M. 9 ; 2-3 p.m._7 3-4 p.m. 6 4-5 p.m. 8 ; 5-6 p.m. 6 ; 6-7 p.m. N/A 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: lla.m.-3p.m. 14 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Fri & Saturday DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING SIGNATUREvOF APPLICANT